alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
      32.1





**SECTION
      906 CERTIFICATION**





I,
      Jeffrey F. O'Donnell, Chief Executive Officer of PhotoMedex, Inc., a Delaware
      corporation (the "Company"), do hereby certify, in accordance with 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as created pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, that:





(1)
      the
      accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended
      December 31, 2006 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
      amended; and





(2)
      the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




PHOTOMEDEX, INC.Dated:
              March 16, 2007
            By:
            /s/
              Jeffrey F. O'DonnellJeffrey
              F. O'Donnell
              Chief
                Executive Officer




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002 (“Section 906”), or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or
      otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the
      electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been
      provided to PhotoMedex, Inc. and will be retained by PhotoMedex, Inc. and
      furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.
22.505 Solicitation provision and contract clause. When a project labor agreement is used for a construction project, the contracting officer shall— ( a ) ( 1 ) Insert the provision at 52.222-33, Notice of Requirement for Project Labor Agreement, in solicitations containing the clause 52.222-34, Project Labor Agreement.
( 2 ) Use the provision with its Alternate I if the agency will require the submission of a project labor agreement from only the apparent successful offeror, prior to contract award.
( 3 ) Use the provision with its Alternate II if an agency allows submission of a project labor agreement after contract award except when Alternate III is used.
( 4 ) Use the provision with its Alternate III when Alternate II of 52.222-34 is used.
( b ) ( 1 ) Insert the clause at 52.222-34, Project Labor Agreement, in solicitations and contracts associated with the construction project.
( 2 ) Use the clause with its Alternate I if an agency allows submission of the project labor agreement after contract award except when Alternate II is used.
( 3 ) Use the clause with its Alternate II in IDIQ contracts when the agency will have project labor agreements negotiated on an order-by-order basis and anticipates one or more orders may not use a project labor agreement.
[88 FR 88728, Dec. 22, 2023]
#### 203.171-2 Definition.

*Covered DoD official* as used in this section, is defined in the clause at 252.203-7000, Requirements Relating to Compensation of Former DoD Officials.

[74 FR 2409, Jan. 15, 2009]
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains regulatory documents having general

applicability and legal effect, most of which

are keyed to and codified in the Code of

Federal Regulations, which is published under

50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.

The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by

the Superintendent of Documents.

Rules and Regulations Federal Register

7059 

Vol. 86, No. 15 

Tuesday, January 26, 2021 

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES 

42 CFR Part 51c 

RIN 0906–AB25 

Implementation of Executive Order on 

Access to Affordable Life-Saving 

Medications 

AGENCY: Health Resources and Services 

Administration (HRSA), Health and 

Human Services (HHS). 

ACTION: Final rule; delay of effective 

date. 

SUMMARY: In accordance with the 

memorandum of January 20, 2021, from 

the Assistant to the President and Chief 

of Staff, entitled ‘‘Regulatory Freeze 

Pending Review,’’ this action 

temporarily delays for 60 days from the 

date of the memorandum the effective 

date of the final rule titled 

‘‘Implementation of Executive Order on 

Access to Affordable Life-saving 

Medications,’’ published in the 

December 23, 2020, Federal Register. 

This document announces that the 

effective date is delayed until March 22, 

2021, the first business day after 60 days 

from the date of the memorandum. 

DATES: The effective date of the final 

rule published in the December 23, 

2020, Federal Register (85 FR 83822), is 

delayed from January 22, 2021, to March 

22, 2021. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Jennifer Joseph, Director, Office of 

Policy and Program Development, 

Bureau of Primary Health Care, HRSA, 

5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 

20857; by email at jjoseph@hrsa.gov; 

telephone: 301–594–4300; fax: 301– 

594–4997. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

January 20, 2021 memorandum from the 

Assistant to the President and Chief of 

Staff, entitled ‘‘Regulatory Freeze 

Pending Review,’’ instructed Federal 

agencies to delay the effective date of 

rules published in the Federal Register, 

but which have not yet taken effect, for 

a period of 60 days from the date of the 

memorandum. This final rule will apply 

to all health centers receiving section 

330(e) grant funds that participate in the 

340B Drug Pricing Program (340B 

Program), (42 U.S.C. 254b and 256b), 

and requires such entities to make 

insulin and injectable epinephrine 

available to health center patients 

identified as low-income or below the 

same price the health center paid 

through the 340B Program. The effective 

date of that rule, which would have 

been January 22, 2021, is now March 22, 

2021. The temporary delay in the 

effective date of this final rule is 

necessary to give Department officials 

the opportunity for further review and 

consideration of new regulations, 

consistent with the memorandum of 

January 20, 2021, from the Assistant to 

the President and Chief of Staff, entitled 

‘‘Regulatory Freeze Pending Review.’’ 

Norris Cochran, 

Acting Secretary, Department of Health and 

Human Services. 

[FR Doc. 2021–01629 Filed 1–21–21; 4:15 pm] 

BILLING CODE 4165–15–P
#### 2124.102 General.
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 16 (Wednesday, January 27, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 7300]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-01710]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Center for Complementary & Integrative Health; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Center for Complementary and 
Integrative Health Special Emphasis Panel; NCCIH Training and 
Education Review Panel (CT).
    Date: February 18th-19th, 2021.
    Time: 8:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: NCCIH/NIH, Democracy II, 6707 Democracy Blvd., Bethesda, 
MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Patrick Colby Still, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Office of Scientific Review, Division of Extramural 
Activities, NCCIH/NIH, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Suite 401, 
Bethesda, MD 20892-5475, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#95e5f4e1e7fcf6febbe6e1fcf9f9d5fbfcfdbbf2fae3"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="84f4e5f0f6ede7efaaf7f0ede8e8c4eaedecaae3ebf2">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.213, 
Research and Training in Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 21, 2021.
Ronald J. Livingston, Jr.,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2021-01710 Filed 1-26-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
IIA 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. J. RES. 57 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United 

States Code, of the rule submitted by Bureau of Consumer Financial 

Protection relating to ‘‘Indirect Auto Lending and Compliance with the 

Equal Credit Opportunity Act’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 22, 2018 

Mr. MORAN (for himself, Mr. TOOMEY, Mr. ENZI, Mr. ROUNDS, Mr. 

LANKFORD, Mr. KENNEDY, Mr. HATCH, Mr. WICKER, Mr. HOEVEN, Mr. 

BLUNT, Mr. JOHNSON, Mr. INHOFE, Mr. HELLER, Mr. ISAKSON, Mr. 

SCOTT, and Mr. BOOZMAN) introduced the following joint resolution; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of 

title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by 

Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to 

‘‘Indirect Auto Lending and Compliance with the Equal 

Credit Opportunity Act’’. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the Bu4 reau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to ‘‘Indi5 rect Auto Lending and Compliance with the Equal Credit 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•SJ 57 IS 

1 Opportunity Act’’ (CFPB Bulletin 2013–02 (March 21, 

2 2013), and printed in the Congressional Record on De3 cember 6, 2017, on pages S7888–S7889, along with a let4 ter of opinion from the Government Accountability Office 

5 dated December 5, 2017, that the Bulletin is a rule under 

6 the Congressional Review Act), and such rule shall have 

7 no force or effect. 

Æ 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 57 Placed on Calendar Senate (PCS)]

<DOC>

                                                       Calendar No. 378
115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. J. RES. 57

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
    United States Code, of the rule submitted by Bureau of Consumer 
Financial Protection relating to ``Indirect Auto Lending and Compliance 
                with the Equal Credit Opportunity Act''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 22, 2018

Mr. Moran (for himself, Mr. Toomey, Mr. Enzi, Mr. Rounds, Mr. Lankford, 
Mr. Kennedy, Mr. Hatch, Mr. Wicker, Mr. Hoeven, Mr. Blunt, Mr. Johnson, 
Mr. Inhofe, Mr. Heller, Mr. Isakson, Mr. Scott, Mr. Boozman, Mr. Crapo, 
  Mrs. Capito, Mr. Cotton, Mr. Roberts, and Mr. Risch) introduced the 
 following joint resolution; which was read twice and referred to the 
            Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs

                             April 12, 2018

  Committee discharged, by petition, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 802(c), and 
                         placed on the calendar

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
    United States Code, of the rule submitted by Bureau of Consumer 
Financial Protection relating to ``Indirect Auto Lending and Compliance 
                with the Equal Credit Opportunity Act''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating 
to ``Indirect Auto Lending and Compliance with the Equal Credit 
Opportunity Act'' (CFPB Bulletin 2013-02 (March 21, 2013), and printed 
in the Congressional Record on December 6, 2017, on pages S7888-S7889, 
along with a letter of opinion from the Government Accountability 
Office dated December 5, 2017, that the Bulletin is a rule under the 
Congressional Review Act), and such rule shall have no force or effect.

                                                       Calendar No. 378

115th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                             S. J. RES. 57

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
    United States Code, of the rule submitted by Bureau of Consumer 
Financial Protection relating to ``Indirect Auto Lending and Compliance 
                with the Equal Credit Opportunity Act''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             April 12, 2018

  Committee discharged, by petition, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 802(c), and 
                         placed on the calendar
```
Case: 1:12-cv-04206 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/30/12 Page 1 of 12 PageID #:1
Case: 1:12-cv-04206 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/30/12 Page 2 of 12 PageID #:2
Case: 1:12-cv-04206 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/30/12 Page 3 of 12 PageID #:3
Case: 1:12-cv-04206 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/30/12 Page 4 of 12 PageID #:4
Case: 1:12-cv-04206 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/30/12 Page 5 of 12 PageID #:5
Case: 1:12-cv-04206 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/30/12 Page 6 of 12 PageID #:6
Case: 1:12-cv-04206 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/30/12 Page 7 of 12 PageID #:7
Case: 1:12-cv-04206 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/30/12 Page 8 of 12 PageID #:8
Case: 1:12-cv-04206 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/30/12 Page 9 of 12 PageID #:9
Case: 1:12-cv-04206 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/30/12 Page 10 of 12 PageID #:10
Case: 1:12-cv-04206 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/30/12 Page 11 of 12 PageID #:11
Case: 1:12-cv-04206 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/30/12 Page 12 of 12 PageID #:12
(December 28, 1964)

#### Carmel *&*Livingston Corp., Appellant, v. Walsh Construction Company, Respondent.

In an action to recover real estate brokerage commissions, plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered June 25, 1963 upon the opinion and decision of the court after a non jury trial, which dismissed the complaint. Judgment affirmed, with costs. In our opinion, the evidence justified the finding that all negotiations were subject to the ultimate approval of the defendant’s board of directors and that such approval was never obtained. Beldock, P. J., Kleinfeld, Brennan, Hill and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT 
 
 
 
 
IceSolv, Inc. - a Pennsylvania corporation which was formed in June 1993. 
 
Cannon Sline, Inc. -- a Pennsylvania corporation formed by merger of 
Oliver B. Cannon & Son, Inc. & Sline Industrial Painters, Inc. 
 
IMCON Painters, Inc. - a Texas corporation which was formed in  
October, 1996. 
 
 
 
Other notes: 
 
(1)	Canisco Resources, Inc. is the survivor by merger of Canisco 
Resources, Inc., a Delaware corporation, Nuclear Support Services, Inc., a 
Virginia corporation and NSS of Delaware, Inc. a Delaware corporation.  
Shareholder approval of the merger of these entities was received at a 
Special Meeting of Shareholders held March 29, 1996.  The merger was 
effective May 24, 1996. 
 
(2)	NSS Numanco, Inc. - The stock of NSS Numanco, Inc. was sold to 
Nuvest L.L.C. of Tulsa, Oklahoma effective February 25, 	1996. 
 
(3)	Henze Services, Inc. - Substantially all the assets of Henze were 
sold to Harley Industries, Inc. of Tulsa, Oklahoma in June, 1996. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Exhibit 22
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. AP-76,581

EX PARTE RICARDO ARTURO HERRERA, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 93-CR-1553-D IN THE 103 JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

RD

FROM CAMERON COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of aggravated

robbery and sentenced to sixty years’ imprisonment. The Thirteenth Court of Appeals affirmed his

conviction. Herrera v. State, No. 13-96-011-CR (Tex. App. - Corpus Christi, November 6, 1997). 

Applicant contends, inter alia, that his appellate counsel rendered ineffective assistance

because counsel failed to advise him of his right to file petition for discretionary review pro se.

Appellate counsel did advise Applicant when the Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction,
2

and advised him of his right to petition this Court for discretionary review. However, appellate

counsel did not advise Applicant of his right to do so pro se, and Applicant alleges that the only

reason he did not pursue discretionary review was that he could not afford to retain counsel. 

The trial court recommends that relief be denied, citing language from this Court’s opinion

in Ex parte Wilson, 956 S.W.2d 25, 27-28 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997), indicating that the appellate

attorney’s actions in that case, of mailing the applicant a copy of the court of appeals’ opinion and

informing him that he did not believe that a petition for discretionary review would have merit, were

sufficient to protect the applicant’s right to file a petition for discretionary review if he so desired. 

We disagree, because as we also stated in Ex parte Wilson, appellate counsel has an obligation to

inform a defendant of the fact that he can pursue discretionary review “on his own.” Id. at 27. We

find, therefore, that Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of-time petition for

discretionary review of the judgment of the Thirteenth Court of Appeals in Cause No. 13-96-011-CR

that affirmed his conviction in Cause No. 93-CR-1553-D from the 103rd Judicial District Court of

Cameron County. Applicant shall file his petition for discretionaryreview with the Thirteenth Court

of Appeals within 30 days of the date on which this Court’s mandate issues.

Applicant's remaining claims are dismissed. See Ex parte Torres, 943 S.W.2d 469 (Tex.

Crim. App. 1997).

Delivered: June 22, 2011

Do not publish
');
	document.write('

|Color photo of Maureen McLaughlin, Senior Advisor to the Secretary and Director of International AffairsPrint photo
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
22.803 Responsibilities. ( a ) The Secretary of Labor is responsible for the— ( 1 ) Administration and enforcement of prescribed parts of E.O. 11246; and
( 2 ) Adoption of rules and regulations and the issuance of orders necessary to achieve the purposes of E.O. 11246.
( b ) The Secretary of Labor has delegated authority and assigned responsibility to the Deputy Assistant Secretary for carrying out the responsibilities assigned to the Secretary by E.O. 11246, except for the issuance of rules and regulations of a general nature.
( c ) The head of each agency is responsible for ensuring that the requirements of this subpart are carried out within the agency, and for cooperating with and assisting the OFCCP in fulfilling its responsibilities.
( d ) In the event the applicability of E.O. 11246 and implementing regulations is questioned, the contracting officer shall forward the matter to the Deputy Assistant Secretary, through agency channels, for resolution.
[48 FR 42258, Sept. 19, 1983, as amended at 63 FR 70283, 70285, Dec. 18, 1998]
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 945 

To amend the Carl D. Perkins Career and Technical Education Act of 

2006 to authorize funds to identify and eliminate excessive occupational 

licensure. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 26, 2017 

Mr. CORNYN (for himself and Mr. PETERS) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To amend the Carl D. Perkins Career and Technical Education Act of 2006 to authorize funds to identify and 

eliminate excessive occupational licensure. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘New Hope and Oppor5 tunity through the Power of Employment Act’’ or the 

6 ‘‘New HOPE Act’’. 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 945 IS

1 SEC. 2. STATE LEADERSHIP ACTIVITIES. 

2 Section 124(c) of the Carl D. Perkins Career and 

3 Technical Education Act of 2006 (20 U.S.C. 2344(c)) is 

4 amended— 

5 (1) in paragraph (16)(B), by striking ‘‘and’’ 

6 after the semicolon; 

7 (2) in paragraph (17), by striking the period at 

8 the end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

9 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

10 ‘‘(18) consulting and coordinating with other 

11 State agencies for the identification, consolidation, 

12 or elimination of licenses or certifications which pose 

13 an unnecessary barrier to entry for aspiring workers 

14 and provide limited consumer protection.’’. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
Washington, DC 20591 

Administrator Huerta: 

On May 8, 2015, our nation will celebrate the 70th aru1iversary of the end ofWorld War II in 

Europe. This war-which threatened our existence as a nation and a free society, and showed the 

strength of American democracy and the spirit and sacrifice of the American people both at 

home and abroad-is one worth commemorating in an extraordinary way. 

As Members of Congress, we believe it is critical to use this mmiversary as a time to remember 

and educate our nation's citizens about the sacrifices of so many Americans to protect our way of 

life and the extraordinary efforts undertaken to preserve freedom here and abroad. It is our belief 

that a flyover by World War II aircraft over the National Mall in Washington on May 8, and 

other similar flyovers around the country in 2015, will be in the public interest as a way to 

commemorate our national achievements and sacrifice during World War II. These flyovers will 

honor those veterans who served our nation so well, and combined with Honor Flights on May 8, 

will allow us to recognize our World War II veterans who are still living. It would also highlight 

our nation's leadership in aviation, the skills and sacrifice of pilots and mechanics, and the 

tremendous achievement in aircraft manufacturing during the war, when over 276,000 aircraft 

were produced in the United States. Leveraging the ongoing efforts of the National Air and 

Space Museum, the flyover will provide a unique aviation educational experience for our 

nation's citizens. 

We ask you and FAA to take a true leadership role in making this tremendous opportunity a 

reality. A National Mall flyover, and similar events, would seize the public imagination, reflect 

our ability to rally together to preserve our national interest, and be a defining moment in 

remembering the historic significance of World II to our nation and aviation. 

Thank you for your consideration, and we look forward to working with you on this important 

initiative. 

Sincerely, 

r:i/)_Ly&? Bil Shuster 

Member of Congress 

PI11NTED ON flECYCLED PAPER 
~~ 

Nick Rahall 

Member of Congress 

~ 

Member of Congress 

Rick Larsen 

Member of Congress 

Richard Hudson 

Member of Congress 

1fiUU1~( 

Mtchael McCaul 

Member of Congress 

v~a.:aFrank LoBiondo 

Member of Congress 

Member of Congress