Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 16 / Wednesday, January 27, 2021 / Notices 7255 

9For a full discussion of this practice, see 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: 

Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 

(May 6, 2003). 

10See Notice of Discontinuation of Policy to Issue 

Liquidation Instructions After 15 Days in 

Applicable Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Proceedings, 86 FR 3995 (January 

15, 2021). 

11See Certain Uncoated Paper from Brazil: Final 

Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, 81 

FR 3115 (January 20, 2016). 

Assessment Rates 

Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(A) of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), 

and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), Commerce 

shall determine, and U.S. Customs and 

Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, 

antidumping duties on all appropriate 

entries covered by this review. 

Because International Paper’s and 

Suzano’s weighted-average dumping 

margins are not zero or de minimis (i.e., 

less than 0.5 percent), Commerce has 

calculated importer-specific 

antidumping duty assessment rates. 

International Paper did not report actual 

entered value for all of its U.S. sales; 

therefore, we calculated importerspecific per-unit duty assessment rates 

by aggregating the total amount of 

antidumping duties calculated for the 

examined sales and dividing this 

amount by the total quantity of those 

sales. Because Suzano reported the 

entered value of its U.S. sales, we 

calculated importer-specific ad valorem 

duty assessment rates based on the ratio 

of the total amount of dumping 

calculated for the examined sales to the 

total entered value of the sales. Where 

either the respondent’s weightedaverage dumping margin is zero or de 

minimis within the meaning of 19 CFR 

351.106(c)(1), or an importer-specific 

assessment rate is zero or de minimis, 

we will instruct CBP to liquidate the 

appropriate entries without regard to 

antidumping duties. 

For entries of subject merchandise 

during the period of review produced by 

International Paper or Suzano for which 

they did not know their merchandise 

was destined for the United States, we 

will instruct CBP to liquidate 

unreviewed entries at the all-others rate 

if there is no rate for the intermediate 

company(ies) involved in the 

transaction.9

Consistent with its recent notice,10

Commerce intends to issue assessment 

instructions to CBP no earlier than 35 

days after the date of publication of the 

final results of this review in the 

Federal Register. If a timely summons is 

filed at the U.S. Court of International 

Trade, the assessment instructions will 

direct CBP not to liquidate relevant 

entries until the time for parties to file 

a request for a statutory injunction has 

expired (i.e., within 90 days of 

publication). 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective for all 

shipments of the subject merchandise 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption on or after the 

publication date of the final results of 

this administrative review, as provided 

by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) 

The cash deposit rate for each specific 

company listed above will be that 

established in the final results of this 

review; (2) for merchandise exported by 

producers or exporters not covered in 

this administrative review but covered 

in a prior segment of the proceeding, the 

cash deposit rate will continue to be the 

company-specific rate published for the 

most recently completed segment of this 

proceeding; (3) if the exporter is not a 

firm covered in this review, a prior 

review, or the original less-than-fairvalue (LTFV) investigation, but the 

producer is, the cash deposit rate will be 

the rate established for the most recently 

completed segment of this proceeding 

for the producer of the subject 

merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit 

rate for all other manufacturers or 

exporters will continue to be 26.95 

percent, the all-others rate established 

in the LTFV investigation.11 These 

deposit requirements, when imposed, 

shall remain in effect until further 

notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice serves as a final reminder 

to importers of their responsibility 

under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a 

certificate regarding the reimbursement 

of antidumping duties prior to 

liquidation of the relevant entries 

during the POR. Failure to comply with 

this requirement could result in 

Commerce’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

occurred and the subsequent assessment 

of double antidumping duties. 

Administrative Protective Order 

This notice also serves as a final 

reminder to parties subject to 

administrative protective order (APO) of 

their responsibility concerning the 

return or destruction of proprietary 

information disclosed under APO in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), 

which continues to govern business 

proprietary information in this segment 

of the proceeding. Timely written 

notification of the return/destruction of 

APO materials, or conversion to judicial 

protective order, is hereby requested. 

Failure to comply with the regulations 

and the terms of an APO is a 

sanctionable violation. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing this 

notice in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act. 

Dated: January 19, 2021. 

Jeffrey I. Kessler, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

Appendix 

List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

V. Discussion of the Issues 

Comment 1: Calculation for Suzano’s 

Financial Expenses 

Comment 2: Programming Issue in 

Suzano’s Margin Calculation 

Comment 3: Treatment of International 

Paper’s FTZ Sales 

Comment 4: Programming Issue in 

International Paper’s Margin Calculation 

VI. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2021–01676 Filed 1–26–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities; Submission to the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) for 

Review and Approval; Comment 

Request; EU-U.S. Privacy Shield; 

Invitation for Applications for Inclusion 

on the List of Arbitrators 

The Department of Commerce will 

submit the following information 

collection request to the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) for 

review and clearance in accordance 

with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 

1995, on or after the date of publication 

of this notice. We invite the general 

public and other Federal agencies to 

comment on proposed, and continuing 

information collections, which helps us 

assess the impact of our information 

collection requirements and minimize 

the public’s reporting burden. Public 

comments were previously requested 

via the Federal Register on November 

24, 2020, during a 60-day comment 

period. This notice allows for an 

additional 30 days for public comments. 

Agency: International Trade 

Administration. 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
7256 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 16 / Wednesday, January 27, 2021 / Notices 

1See Certain Uncoated Paper Products from 

Australia, Brazil, the People’s Republic of China, 

and Indonesia: Initiation of Anti-Circumvention 

Inquiry on the Antidumping and Countervailing 

Duty Orders, 84 FR 55915 (October 18, 2019). 2See Certain Uncoated Paper from Australia, 

Brazil, Indonesia, the People’s Republic of China, 

and Portugal: Amended Final Affirmative 

Antidumping Determinations for Brazil and 

Indonesia and Antidumping Duty Orders, 81 FR 

11174 (March 3, 2016) (Order). 3See Memorandum, ‘‘Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum for the Anti-Circumvention Inquiry 

on the Antidumping Duty Order on Certain 

Uncoated Paper from Australia: Uncoated Paper 

Rolls,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby 

adopted by, this notice (Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum). 

4One of the key measurements of any grade of 

paper is brightness. Generally speaking, the brighter 

the paper the better the contrast between the paper 

and the ink. Brightness is measured using a GE 

Reflectance Scale, which measures the reflection of 

light off a grade of paper. One is the lowest 

reflection, or what would be given to a totally black 

grade, and 100 is the brightest measured grade. 

‘‘Colored paper’’ as used in this scope definition 

means a paper with a hue other than white that 

reflects one of the primary colors of magenta, 

yellow, and cyan (red, yellow, and blue) or a 

combination of such primary colors. 

Title: EU-U.S. Privacy Shield; 

Invitation for Applications for Inclusion 

on the List of Arbitrators. 

OMB Control Number: 0625–0277. 

Form Number(s): None. 

Type of Request: Regular submission, 

revision of a current information 

collection. 

Number of Respondents: 40. 

Average Hours per Response: 240 

minutes. 

Burden Hours: 160 hours. 

Needs and Uses: As described in 

Annex I of the EU-U.S. Privacy Shield 

Framework, the Department of 

Commerce (the Department) and the 

European Commission (the 

Commission) committed to implement 

an arbitration mechanism to provide 

European individuals with the ability to 

invoke binding arbitration to determine, 

for residual claims, whether an 

organization has violated its obligations 

under the Privacy Shield. Organizations 

voluntarily self-certify to the EU-U.S. 

Privacy Shield Framework and, upon 

certification, the commitments the 

organization has made to comply with 

the EU-U.S. Privacy Shield Framework 

become legally enforceable under U.S. 

law. Organizations that self-certify to 

the EU-U.S. Privacy Shield Framework 

commit to binding arbitration of 

residual claims if a European individual 

chooses to exercise that option. Under 

the arbitration option, a Privacy Shield 

Panel (consisting of one or three 

arbitrators, as agreed by the parties) has 

the authority to impose individualspecific, non-monetary equitable relief 

(such as access, correction, deletion, or 

return of the European individual’s data 

in question) necessary to remedy the 

violation of the EU-U.S. Privacy Shield 

Framework only with respect to the 

European individual. The Department 

and the Commission will seek to 

maintain a list of at least 20 arbitrators 

chosen based on independence, 

integrity, and expertise from which the 

parties will select the arbitrators. The 

arbitral mechanism outlined in Annex I 

of the EU-U.S. Privacy Shield 

Framework and Swiss-U.S. Privacy 

Shield Framework is a critical 

component of the Privacy Shield 

frameworks. Publishing this notice to 

collect information from individuals 

applying for inclusion on the list of 

arbitrators is a necessary step to 

maintain the arbitral mechanism. The 

Department previously requested and 

obtained approval of this information 

collection (OMB Control No. 0625– 

0277) and now seeks renewal of this 

information collection. Although the 

Department is not currently seeking 

additional applications, it may do so in 

the future as appropriate. 

Affected Public: Private individuals. 

Frequency: Recurrent, depending on 

the number of arbitrators required to 

retain an active list of 20 arbitrators. 

Respondent’s Obligation: Required to 

obtain or retain benefits. 

Legal Authority: The Department’s 

statutory authority to foster, promote, 

and develop international commerce (15 

U.S.C. 1512). 

This information collection request 

may be viewed at www.reginfo.gov. 

Follow the instructions to view the 

Department of Commerce collections 

currently under review by OMB. 

Written comments and 

recommendations for the proposed 

information collection should be 

submitted within 30 days of the 

publication of this notice on the 

following website www.reginfo.gov/ 

public/do/PRAMain. Find this 

particular information collection by 

selecting ‘‘Currently under 30-day 

Review—Open for Public Comments’’ or 

by using the search function and 

entering either the title of the collection 

or the OMB Control Number 0625–0277. 

Sheleen Dumas, 

Department PRA Clearance Officer, Office of 

the Chief Information Officer, Commerce 

Department. 

[FR Doc. 2021–01803 Filed 1–26–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–602–807] 

Certain Uncoated Paper From 

Australia: Negative Preliminary 

Determination of Circumvention of the 

Antidumping Duty Order for Uncoated 

Paper Rolls 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) preliminarily determines 

that imports of certain uncoated paper 

rolls from Australia were not completed 

by conversion into sheets of paper in the 

United States and, therefore, such 

imports are not circumventing the 

antidumping duty (AD) order on certain 

uncoated paper products from Australia, 

within the meaning of section 781(a) of 

the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the 

Act). We invite interested parties to 

comment on this preliminary 

determination. 

DATES: Applicable January 27, 2021. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Genevieve Coen, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office V, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–3251. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On October 10, 2019, Commerce 

initiated an anti-circumvention inquiry 

to determine whether imports of certain 

uncoated paper rolls that are further 

processed into uncoated paper sheets in 

the United States 1 are circumventing 

the Order on certain uncoated paper 

from Australia.2 Commerce issued a 

questionnaire soliciting data on the 

quantity and value (Q&V) of exports of 

uncoated paper rolls to Australian Paper 

Pty. Ltd. (Australian Paper) and 

received a timely response, in which 

Australian Paper notified Commerce 

that it had no shipments of inquiry 

merchandise during the period under 

consideration. Thereafter, Commerce 

selected Australian Paper as the sole 

mandatory respondent in this inquiry in 

order to examine its no shipment claim, 

and we issued an initial questionnaire 

and two supplemental questionnaires to 

this company. Australian Paper 

submitted timely responses to these 

questionnaires. For a complete 

description of the events that followed 

the initiation of this inquiry, see the 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum.3

Scope of the Order 

The merchandise subject to this Order 

includes uncoated paper in sheet form; 

weighing at least 40 grams per square 

meter but not more than 150 grams per 

square meter; that either is a white 

paper with a GE brightness level 4 of 85 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES