3118 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 9 / Thursday, January 14, 2021 / Notices 

1See Welded Line Pipe from the Republic of 

Korea: Final Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2015–2016, 83 FR 33919 

(July 18, 2018) (Final Results). 

2See Welded Line Pipe from the Republic of 

Korea: Amended Final Results of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review; 2015–2016, 83 FR 

39682 (August 10, 2018) (Amended Final Results). 

comment preceding submission of the 

collection to OMB. 

DATES: To ensure consideration, 

comments regarding this proposed 

information collection must be received 

on or before March 15, 2021. 

ADDRESSES: Interested persons are 

invited to submit comments by email to 

Mark Crace, IC Liaison, Bureau of 

Industry and Security, at mark.crace@

bis.doc.gov or to PRAcomments@

doc.gov. Please reference OMB Control 

Number 0694–0100 in the subject line of 

your comments. Do not submit 

Confidential Business Information or 

otherwise sensitive or protected 

information. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Requests for additional information or 

specific questions related to collection 

activities should be directed to Mark 

Crace, IC Liaison, Bureau of Industry 

and Security, phone 202–482–8093 or 

by email at mark.crace@bis.doc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Abstract 

The Technical Advisory Committees 

(TACs) were established to advise and 

assist the U.S. Government on export 

control matters. In managing the 

operations of the TACs, the Department 

of Commerce is responsible for 

implementing the policies and 

procedures prescribed in the Federal 

Advisory Committee Act. The Bureau of 

Industry and Security provides 

technical and administrative support for 

the TACs, such as scheduling a 

conference room, publishing TAC 

meeting notices in the Federal Register, 

circulating an agenda, copying 

documents, etc. The TACs advise the 

government on proposed revisions to 

export control lists, licensing 

procedures, assessments of the foreign 

availability of controlled products, and 

export control regulations. 

II. Method of Collection 

Supplement No. 2 to Part 730 of the 

Export Administration Regulations, 

states that any producers of articles, 

materials, or supplies, including 

technology, software, and other 

information, that are subject to export 

controls, or are being considered for 

such controls because of their 

significance to the national security of 

the United States, may request (via a 

letter or an attachment to an email) the 

Secretary of Commerce to establish a 

technical advisory committee. Such 

requests are sent to the Assistant 

Secretary of Export Administration. 

III. Data 

OMB Control Number: 0694–0100. 

Form Number(s): None. 

Type of Review: Regular submission. 

Affected Public: Business or other forprofit organizations. 

Estimated Number of Respondents: 1. 

Estimated Time per Response: 5 

hours. 

Estimated Total Annual Burden 

Hours: 5. 

Estimated Total Annual Cost to 

Public: 0. 

Respondent’s Obligation: Voluntary. 

Legal Authority: Section 4812(b)(7) 

and 4814(b)(1)(B) of the Export Control 

Reform Act (ECRA). 

IV. Request for Comments 

We are soliciting public comments to 

permit the Department/Bureau to: (a) 

Evaluate whether the proposed 

information collection is necessary for 

the proper functions of the Department, 

including whether the information will 

have practical utility; (b) Evaluate the 

accuracy of our estimate of the time and 

cost burden for this proposed collection, 

including the validity of the 

methodology and assumptions used; (c) 

Evaluate ways to enhance the quality, 

utility, and clarity of the information to 

be collected; and (d) Minimize the 

reporting burden on those who are to 

respond, including the use of automated 

collection techniques or other forms of 

information technology. 

Comments that you submit in 

response to this notice are a matter of 

public record. We will include or 

summarize each comment in our request 

to OMB to approve this ICR. Before 

including your address, phone number, 

email address, or other personal 

identifying information in your 

comment, you should be aware that 

your entire comment—including your 

personal identifying information—may 

be made publicly available at any time. 

While you may ask us in your comment 

to withhold your personal identifying 

information from public review, we 

cannot guarantee that we will be able to 

do so. 

Sheleen Dumas, 

Department PRA Clearance Officer, Office of 

the Chief Information Officer, Commerce 

Department. 

[FR Doc. 2021–00596 Filed 1–13–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–33–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–580–876] 

Welded Line Pipe From the Republic of 

Korea: Notice of Court Decision Not in 

Harmony With the Amended Final 

Results in the Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review and Notice of 

Amended Final Results 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On January 4, 2021, the U.S. 

Court of International Trade (CIT) 

sustained the Department of 

Commerce’s (Commerce’s) second 

remand results pertaining to the first 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on welded line 

pipe (WLP) from the Republic of Korea 

(Korea) covering the period of review 

(POR) of May 22, 2015 through 

November 30, 2016. Commerce is 

notifying the public that the CIT’s final 

judgment in this case is not in harmony 

with Commerce’s amended final results 

in the first administrative review of 

WLP from Korea. Consistent with the 

CIT’s final judgment, Commerce is 

amending the weighted-average 

dumping margins calculated for 

Hyundai Steel Company/Hyundai 

HYSCO (Hyundai Steel), SeAH Steel 

Corporation (SeAH), and the 22 nonselected companies 

DATES: Applicable January 14, 2021. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

David Goldberger or Joshua Tucker, AD/ 

CVD Operations Office II, Enforcement 

and Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 

(202) 482–4136 and (202) 482–2044, 

respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On July 18, 2018, Commerce 

published its Final Results in the first 

administrative review of WLP from 

Korea.1 Subsequently, on August 10, 

2018, Commerce published its 

Amended Final Results.2 As reflected in 

the Amended Final Results, Commerce 

calculated weighted-average dumping 

margins of 18.77 percent for Hyundai 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 9 / Thursday, January 14, 2021 / Notices 3119 

3 Id., 83 FR at 39682–83. 

4See Husteel Co., Ltd. et al. v. United States, 426 

F. Supp. 3d 1376 (CIT 2020). 

5See Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant 

to Court Remand, Consol. Court No. 18–00169, 

dated April 1, 2020 (First Remand Results), at 1– 

2. 

6See Husteel Co., Ltd. et al. v. United States, 463 

F. Supp. 3d 1334 (CIT 2020) (Husteel II). 

7See Husteel II, 463 F. Supp. 3d at 1343–1344. 

8See Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant 

to Second Court Remand, Consol. Court No. 18– 

00169, dated September 16, 2020 (Second Remand 

Results). 

9See Timken Co. v. United States, 893 F.2d 337, 

341 (Fed. Cir. 1990) (Timken). 

10See Diamond Sawblades Mfrs. Coalition v. 

United States, 626 F.3d 1374 (Fed. Cir. 2010) 

(Diamond Sawblades). 

11See sections 516A(c) and (e) of the Act. 

12The review-specific average rate is based on the 

simple average margin for those companies selected 

for individual review. Because we cannot apply our 

normal methodology of calculating a weightedaverage margin due to requests to protect business 

proprietary information, we find this rate to be the 

best proxy of the actual weighted-average margin 

determined for the mandatory respondents. See Ball 

Bearings and Parts Thereof from France, et al.: 

Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Reviews, Final Results of Changed-Circumstances 

Review, and Revocation of an Order in Part, 75 FR 

53661, 53663 (September 1, 2010). 

13For a full discussion of this practice, see 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: 

Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 

(May 6, 2003). 

Steel, 14.39 percent for SeAH, and 16.58 

percent for the 22 companies receiving 

the review-specific average rate.3

Hyundai Steel, SeAH, NEXTEEL Co., 

Ltd. (NEXTEEL), and Husteel Co., Ltd. 

appealed Commerce’s Final Results, as 

amended by the Amended Final Results, 

to the CIT. On January 3, 2020, the CIT 

remanded for Commerce to explain or 

reconsider its: (1) Rejection of SeAH’s 

third country sales to calculate normal 

value (NV); (2) finding of a particular 

market situation (PMS) in the Korean 

market for the hot-rolled coil input; and 

(3) PMS adjustment to the respondents’ 

cost of production (COP) for the 

purposes of the sales-below-cost test.4

On April 1, 2020, Commerce issued the 

First Remand Results, in which, under 

protest, it: (1) Relied on SeAH’s thirdcountry sales to calculate NV; (2) 

determined that there is no PMS that 

distorts the COP of WLP; and (3) 

recalculated the weighted-average 

dumping margins for Hyundai Steel and 

SeAH without the PMS adjustment to 

the COP for the sales-below-cost test.5

As a result, Commerce calculated 

revised weighted-average dumping 

margins for Hyundai Steel and SeAH of 

9.24 percent and 4.70 percent, 

respectively. In addition, as a result of 

Commerce’s recalculation of the 

weighted-average dumping margins for 

the mandatory respondents, Commerce 

revised the review-specific average rate 

applied to the non-selected respondents 

to 6.97 percent. 

The CIT sustained Commerce’s First 

Remand Results with respect to these 

issues.6 In addition, the CIT granted 

Commerce’s request for a remand to 

consider whether to apply a constructed 

export price (CEP) offset to SeAH’s 

Canadian sales.7 On September 16, 

2020, Commerce issued its Second 

Remand Results, in which it: (1) 

Granted SeAH a CEP offset; (2) 

calculated a revised weighted-average 

dumping margin for SeAH of 4.23 

percent; and (3) and revised the reviewspecific average rate applied to the nonselected respondents to 6.74 percent.8

On January 4, 2021, the CIT sustained 

Commerce’s Second Remand Results. 

Timken Notice 

In its decision in Timken,9 as clarified 

by Diamond Sawblades,10 the Court of 

Appeals for the Federal Circuit held 

that, pursuant to section 516A(c) and (e) 

of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended 

(the Act), Commerce must publish a 

notice of a court decision that is not ‘‘in 

harmony’’ with a Commerce 

determination and must suspend 

liquidation of entries pending a 

‘‘conclusive’’ court decision.11 The 

CIT’s January 4, 2021 judgment in this 

case constitutes a final decision of that 

court that is not in harmony with 

Commerce’s Final Results, as amended 

by the Amended Final Results. This 

notice is published in fulfillment of the 

publication requirements of Timken and 

section 516A of the Act. 

Amended Final Results 

Because there is now a final court 

decision, Commerce is amending its 

Amended Final Results with respect to 

the weighted-average dumping margins 

for Hyundai Steel, SeAH, and the nonselected respondents.12 The revised 

weighted-average dumping margins are 

as follows: 

Exporter/producer 

Weightedaverage 

dumping 

margin 

(percent) 

Hyundai Steel Company/ 

Hyundai HYSCO ............... 9.24 

SeAH Steel Corporation ....... 4.23 

AJU BESTEEL CO., Ltd ....... 6.74 

Daewoo International Corporation ............................. 6.74 

Dong Yang Steel Pipe .......... 6.74 

Dongbu Incheon Steel Co .... 6.74 

Dongbu Steel Co., Ltd .......... 6.74 

Dongkuk Steel Mill ................ 6.74 

EEW Korea Co, Ltd .............. 6.74 

HISTEEL Co., Ltd ................. 6.74 

Husteel Co., Ltd .................... 6.74 

Keonwood Metals Co., Ltd ... 6.74 

Kolon Global Corp ................ 6.74 

Korea Cast Iron Pipe Ind. 

Co., Ltd ............................. 6.74 

Miju Steel MFG Co., Ltd ....... 6.74 

Exporter/producer 

Weightedaverage 

dumping 

margin 

(percent) 

MSTEEL Co., Ltd ................. 6.74 

NEXTEEL Co., Ltd ............... 6.74 

Poongsan Valinox (Valtimet 

Division) ............................ 6.74 

POSCO ................................. 6.74 

Sam Kang M&T Co., Ltd ...... 6.74 

Sin Sung Metal Co., Ltd ....... 6.74 

Soon-Hong Trading Company .................................. 6.74 

Steel Flower Co., Ltd ............ 6.74 

TGS Pipe .............................. 6.74 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

Because there have been subsequent 

administrative reviews involving 

Hyundai Steel, SeAH, and the nonselected respondents covered by the 

review-specific average rate, the cash 

deposit rates for these exporters will 

remain the rate established in the most 

recently-completed administrative 

review in which they received a cash 

deposit rate. 

Liquidation of Suspended Entries 

In the event that the CIT’s final 

judgment is not appealed or, if 

appealed, is upheld by a final and 

conclusive court decision, Commerce 

will instruct U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection (CBP) to assess antidumping 

duties on unliquidated entries of subject 

merchandise based on the importerspecific assessment rates recalculated 

for: (1) Hyundai Steel in the First 

Remand Results; and (2) SeAH and the 

non-selected respondents covered by 

the review-specific average rate (subject 

to this litigation) in the Second Remand 

Results. 

Consistent with Commerce’s 

assessment practice, for entries of 

subject merchandise during the POR 

produced by Hyundai Steel or SeAH for 

which they did not know that the 

merchandise was destined for the 

United States, we will instruct CBP to 

liquidate unreviewed entries at the all 

others rate if there is no rate for the 

intermediate company(ies) involved in 

the transaction.13

Finally, during the pendency of 

litigation, including any appeal, 

Commerce remains enjoined by Court 

order from liquidating entries: (1) 

Produced and/or exported by Hyundai 

Steel, SeAH, NEXTEEL, or Husteel; (2) 

the subject of Final Results, as amended 

by the Amended Final Results; (2) 

entered, or were withdrawn from 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
3120 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 9 / Thursday, January 14, 2021 / Notices 

warehouse, for consumption on or after 

May 22, 2015, up to and including 

November 30, 2016; and (3) remain 

unliquidated as of the date the Court 

issued the applicable statutory 

injunction. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

This notice is issued and published in 

accordance with sections 516A(e)(1), 

751(a)(1), and 777(i)(1) of the Act. 

Dated: January 8, 2021. 

Jeffrey I. Kessler, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

[FR Doc. 2021–00723 Filed 1–13–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

National Institute of Standards and 

Technology 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities; Submission to the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) for 

Review and Approval; Comment 

Request; Organization of Scientific 

Area Committees for Forensic Science 

(OSAC) Membership Application 

AGENCY: National Institute of Standards 

and Technology (NIST), Commerce. 

ACTION: Notice of information collection, 

request for comment. 

SUMMARY: The Department of 

Commerce, in accordance with the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 

(PRA), invites the general public and 

other Federal agencies to comment on 

proposed, and continuing information 

collections, which helps us assess the 

impact of our information collection 

requirements and minimize the public’s 

reporting burden. The purpose of this 

notice is to allow for 60 days of public 

comment preceding submission of the 

collection to OMB. 

DATES: To ensure consideration, 

comments regarding this proposed 

information collection must be received 

on or before March 15, 2021. 

ADDRESSES: Interested persons are 

invited to submit written comments by 

mail to Maureen O’Reilly, Management 

Analyst, NIST, at PRAcomments@

doc.gov. Please reference OMB Control 

Number 0693–0070 in the subject line of 

your comments. Do not submit 

Confidential Business Information or 

otherwise sensitive or protected 

information. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Requests for additional information or 

specific questions related to collection 

activities should be directed to John 

Paul Jones II, Program Manager, Office 

of Special Programs, NIST, 301–975– 

2782; john.jones@nist.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Abstract 

NIST established the Organization of 

Scientific Area Committees for Forensic 

Science (OSAC) to enable a coordinated 

U.S. approach to standards for the 

forensic science disciplines. NIST seeks 

broad participation from forensic 

science practitioners, researchers, 

meteorologists, statisticians, 

accreditation bodes, defense, and 

prosecution. NIST solicits selfnominations from these communities, 

using the OSAC Membership 

Application, to identify individuals 

interested and qualified to contribute. 

II. Method of Collection 

The OSAC Membership Application 

may be completed and submitted only 

via web-based application. 

III. Data 

OMB Control Number: 0693–0070. 

Form Number(s): None. 

Type of Review: Regular submission, 

extension of a current information 

collection. 

Affected Public: Individuals or 

households. 

Estimated Number of Respondents: 

1,000. 

Estimated Time per Response: 30 

minutes. 

Estimated Total Annual Burden 

Hours: 500. 

Estimated Total Annual Cost to 

Public: $0. 

Respondent’s Obligation: Voluntary. 

Legal Authority: 

IV. Request for Comments 

We are soliciting public comments to 

permit the Department/Bureau to: (a) 

Evaluate whether the proposed 

information collection is necessary for 

the proper functions of the Department, 

including whether the information will 

have practical utility; (b) Evaluate the 

accuracy of our estimate of the time and 

cost burden for this proposed collection, 

including the validity of the 

methodology and assumptions used; (c) 

Evaluate ways to enhance the quality, 

utility, and clarity of the information to 

be collected; and (d) Minimize the 

reporting burden on those who are to 

respond, including the use of automated 

collection techniques or other forms of 

information technology. 

Comments that you submit in 

response to this notice are a matter of 

public record. We will include or 

summarize each comment in our request 

to OMB to approve this ICR. Before 

including your address, phone number, 

email address, or other personal 

identifying information in your 

comment, you should be aware that 

your entire comment—including your 

personal identifying information—may 

be made publicly available at any time. 

While you may ask us in your comment 

to withhold your personal identifying 

information from public review, we 

cannot guarantee that we will be able to 

do so. 

Sheleen Dumas, 

Department PRA Clearance Officer, Office of 

the Chief Information Officer, Commerce 

Department. 

[FR Doc. 2021–00583 Filed 1–13–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

National Oceanic and Atmospheric 

Administration 

[RTID 0648–XA748] 

North Pacific Fishery Management 

Council; Public Meeting 

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries 

Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 

Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), 

Commerce. 

ACTION: Notice of web conference. 

SUMMARY: The North Pacific Fishery 

Management Council’s (Council) 

Scallop Plan Team will meet February 

17, 2021. 

DATES: The meeting will be held on 

Wednesday, February 17, 2021, from 9 

a.m. to 1 p.m., Alaska Time. 

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be a web 

conference. Join online through the link 

at https://meetings.npfmc.org/Meeting/ 

Details/1846. 

Council address: North Pacific 

Fishery Management Council, 1007 W 

3rd Ave, Anchorage, AK 99501–2252; 

telephone: (907) 271–2809. Instructions 

for attending the meeting via video 

conference are given under 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jim 

Armstrong, Council staff; phone; (907) 

271–2809; email: james.armstrong@

noaa.gov. For technical support please 

contact our admin Council staff, email: 

npfmc.admin@noaa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Agenda 

Wednesday, February 17, 2021 

The Council’s Scallop Plan Team will 

update the status of the Alaska 

weathervane scallop stocks and the 

Stock Assessment and Fishery 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES