alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-27-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-28-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-27-1997
<CASH>                                          16,925
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  251,220
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (3,573)
<INVENTORY>                                    155,312
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               424,436
<PP&E>                                         273,052
<DEPRECIATION>                               (173,716)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 555,472
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          552,205
<BONDS>                                        100,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        880
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 (221,926)<F1>
<SALES>                                      1,424,320
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,424,320
<CGS>                                        1,352,936
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,352,936
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               168,769<F2>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              36,502
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (108,856)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,035
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (109,891)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (109,891)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0<F3>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0<F3>
<FN>
<F1>Other-SE includes additional paid in capital of $551,027 and accumulated
deficit of $772,953
<F2>Other expenses include Research & Development exp of $106,249, Selling, General
and Administrative exp of $62,520
<F3>Earning per share is not applicable.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
PUBLIC LAW 111–162—APR. 30, 2010 124 STAT. 1129 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S. 3253: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 156 (2010): 

Apr. 22, considered and passed Senate. 

Apr. 27, considered and passed House. 

Æ 

Public Law 111–162 

111th Congress 

An Act 

To provide for an additional temporary extension of programs under the Small 

Business Act and the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, and for other purposes. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. ADDITIONAL TEMPORARY EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATION 

OF PROGRAMS UNDER THE SMALL BUSINESS ACT AND 

THE SMALL BUSINESS INVESTMENT ACT OF 1958. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1 of the Act entitled ‘‘An Act to 

extend temporarily certain authorities of the Small Business 

Administration’’, approved October 10, 2006 (Public Law 109–316; 

120 Stat. 1742), as most recently amended by section 1 of Public 

Law 111–136 (124 Stat. 6), is amended by striking ‘‘April 30, 

2010’’ each place it appears and inserting ‘‘July 31, 2010’’. 

(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by subsection 

(a) shall take effect on April 29, 2010. 

Approved April 30, 2010. 

Apr. 30, 2010 

[S. 3253] 


anorris on DSK5R6SHH1PROD with PUBLIC LAWS
#### WESTERMAN v. METROPOLITAN ST. RY. CO.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.

November 6, 1903.)

1. Street Railways—Collision with Team Crossing Track—Contributory Negligence.

A finding that plaintiff, injured by the wagon on which he was riding being struck by a street car, was not guilty of contributory negligence, is authorized, there being evidence that the car had stopped half a block away, when the wagon approached the track, by a diagonal path, to cross it, though plaintiff did' not look for the car; the place not being one of obvious danger, and there being evidence that, if he had looked, the position of the car was such that danger in attempting to cross would not have been apparent.

Appeal from City Court of New York.

Action by James J. Westerman against the Metropolitan Street Railway Company. From a judgment on a verdict for plaintiff, defendant appeals. Affirmed.

Argued before FREEDMAN, P. J., and BISCHOFF and BLANCHARD, JJ.

*502H. A. Robinson (F. Angelo Gaynor and Bayard H. Ames, of counsel), for appellant.

J. Arthur Hilton and M. Casewell Heine, for respondent.

BISCHOFF, J.

The jury could properly find from the evidence that the car had stopped at a point half a block away when the wagon approached the track in the course of an attempt to cross. The path taken was diagonal; hence the inference that the car overtook the wagon is permissible, and there is no improbability in the account given by plaintiff’s witness that the car proceeded 85 feet while the wagon was thus making a diagonal crossing. Concededly, negligence of the driver of the wagon was not to be imputed to the plaintiff, and his failure to look for the car was not necessarily an act of negligence. The place was not a place of obvious danger, as at a railway crossing, and the position of the car was such that, had he looked, danger in the attempt to cross was not apparent, according to acceptable evidence. Therefore the jury could find, as a matter of reasonable inference, that there was no contributory negligence. Lane v. Brooklyn Heights R. R. Co., 85 App. Div. 89, 82 N. Y. Supp. 1057.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur
Case: 1:12-cr-00367 Document #: 20 Filed: 07/16/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:31
**Exhibit 31.1****RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATION**1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Camco Financial Corporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this quarterly report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of Camco as of, and for, the periods presented in thisquarterly report; 4. Camco’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) andinternal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for Camco and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to Camco, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;  b. Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused suchinternal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, toprovide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting andthe preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance withgenerally accepted accounting principles;  c. Evaluated the effectiveness of Camco’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusion about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by thisquarterly report based on such evaluations; and  d. Disclosed in this report any change in Camco’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during Camco’s most recent fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, Camco’sinternal control over financial reporting.5. Camco’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of Camco’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in Camco’s internal control over financialreporting.     Date: November 5, 2005 /s/ Richard C. Baylor         Richard C. Baylor, Chief Executive Officer
#### Ann Sable, Respondent, v. Edward Snyder et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

In an action to foreclose a mortgage made by defendant Lillian Snyder, covering a one-family house owned by her, in which she asserted *823counterclaims, based on misrepresentation and fraud, for the cancellation of the mortgage and the accompanying bond, said defendant and her husband, defendant Edward Snyder, appeal: (1) from an order of the Supreme Court, *Nassau*County, dated June 2, 1960, which denied their motion to open their default in appearing for trial, to set aside the inquest and to restore the action to the Trial Calendar; and (2) from the judgment of foreclosure of said court, entered August 25, 1960, upon said inquest. Order reversed, motion granted, default opened, action restored to the Trial Calendar, and inquest and foreclosure judgment vacated, on condition that, within 20 days after entry of the order hereon, the said Snyder defendants shall pay to the plaintiff the sum of $100 together with $10 costs and disbursements on the appeal from the order. In the event said defendants fail to comply with this condition, the order is affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements to the plaintiff and the appeal from the judgment is dismissed. No appeal lies from a default judgment. Said defendants made a sufficient showing of merit and, under all the circumstances, their default should be opened upon the condition stated. Beldock, Acting P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Pette, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted), Kambiz Hooshmand, Chief
Executive Officer of Applied Micro Circuits Corporation (the Company), hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



|1. |  | The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, and
|-- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) or its staff upon request.



This certification accompanies the Form 10-K to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference into any
filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Annual Report), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such
filing.



|                    |  |  |  |                        
|------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|Dated: June 6, 2005 |  |  |  | /s/    KAMBIZ HOOSHMAND
|                    |  |  |  | Kambiz Hooshmand       
|                    |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer
Color photoSmall

Color photoLarge (zip file)

For additional photos, visit the Press Room's photo area.

|Last Modified: 02/13/2004
|-------------------------
Exhibit 23

               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS




The Board of Directors
Mid-America Bancorp:


We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration 
Statements No. 2-92270, No. 2-99495, No. 33-42989, and No. 333-
45091 on Forms S-8 of Mid-America Bancorp of our report dated 
January 22, 1999, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of 
Mid-America Bancorp and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1998 and 
1997, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in 
shareholders' equity, comprehensive income, and cash flows for each 
of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1998, 
which report appears in the 1998 annual report to shareholders, 
which is incorporated by reference in the December 31, 1998 annual 
report on Form 10-K of Mid-America Bancorp.                     



Louisville, Kentucky                    /s/ KPMG LLP
March 24,1999

<PAGE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6.1.1

Eastern Division

Grant Birchmeier, et al.

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:12−cv−04069

Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly

Caribbean Cruise Line, Inc., et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Tuesday, February 21, 2017:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly: The motion of

Freedom Home Care, Inc. to file a surreply [585] is denied. The motion does not set forth

sufficient grounds warranting further briefing. (mk)

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.
#### 1852.215-81 Proposal page limitations.

As prescribed in 1815.209-70(d), insert the following provision:

# Proposal Page Limitations (APR 2015)

(a) The following page limitations are established for each portion of the proposal submitted in response to this solicitation.

| Proposal section(List each volume or section) | Page limit(Specify limit) | [Proposal subsection](List each subsection) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | | (e.g. Offeror's Subcontracting Plan should not exceed 20 pages) |

(b) A page is defined as one side of sheet, 81⁄2′′ × 11′′, with at least one inch margins on all sides, using not smaller than 12 point type. Foldouts count as an equivalent number of 81⁄2′′ × 11′′ pages. The metric standard format most closely approximating the described standard 81⁄2′′ × 11′′ size may also be used. Other limitations/instructions identified as follows: (*fill-in,* if there are other limitations/instructions).

1

2

1

2

1

2

(c) Identify any exclusions to the page limits that are excluded from the page counts specified in paragraph (a) of this provision (*e.g.* title pages, table of contents) as follows: (*fill-in*). In addition, the Cost section of your proposal is not page limited. However, this section is to be strictly limited to cost and price information. Information that can be construed as belonging in one of the other sections of the proposal will be so construed and counted against that section's page limitation.

(d) If final proposal revisions are requested, separate page limitations will be specified in the Government's request for that submission.

(e) Pages submitted in excess of the limitations specified in this provision will not be evaluated by the Government and will be returned to the offeror.

(End of provision)

[62 FR 3483, Jan. 23, 1997, as amended at 63 FR 9966, Feb. 27, 1998; 80 FR 12946, Mar. 12, 2015; 80 FR 68778, Nov. 6, 2015]
');
	document.write('

On February 2, 2015 President Obama released his Fiscal Year 2016 Budget. "The budget that the President released today reflects this Administration's belief that every single child in this country deserves the opportunity to receive a strong education," said U.S. Secretary of Education Arne Duncan. "As demonstrated by the record high school graduation rate and record college enrollment rates for minority students, states, districts, educators, and students across the country are making real progress. The President's budget would continue and accelerate that progress."

The following materials show what this budget provides for the programs and activities of the Department of Education:

- Press Release
- FY 2016 Education Budget Fact Sheet [**PDF,** 76KB]
- The FY 2016 Education Budget Summary and Background Information [**PDF,** 1MB] provides program information and detailed budget tables.
- The FY 2016 Justifications of Appropriations Estimates to the Congress.
- FY 2016 Budget: Investing in America’s Future [**MS PowerPoint,** 4.8MB]

### On the Homeroom Blog

- The President’s Fiscal Year 2016 Budget Request: Building on Priorities for a Strong Elementary and Secondary Education Act
- The 2016 Budget: Improving Opportunity and Affordability in Higher  Education
- A Bird’s Eye View of the Fiscal Year 2016 Budget Request for  Education

### FY 2016 Budget for the entire U.S. Government

- The President’s FY 2016 Budget for the entire United States  Government
- OMB  Fact Sheet: Middle Class Economics: The President’s Fiscal Year 2016 Budget
United States 

Department of 

Agriculture 

Forest 

Service 

Intermountain 

Region 

Wasatch-Cache 

National Forest 

February 2003 

 

Revised

Forest Plan

Wasatch-Cache

National Forest
Publications
```
Appendix Table 2.--Fish taxa captured by beach seine at potential juvenile salmonid stranding beaches along the Columbia River, June-September 1992 and March-July 1993. Common name Scientific name 1992 1993
ClupeidaeAmerican shad Alosa sapidissima x x
SalmonidaeChinook salmon Oncorhynchus tshawytscha x xCoho salmon Oncorhynchus kisutch x xRainbow trout 
(steelhead) Oncorhynchus mykiss xCutthroat trout Oncorhynchus clarki x
CyprinidaeNorthern squawfish Ptychocheilus oregonensis x Peamouth Mylocheilus caurinus x x 
CatostomidaeLargescale sucker Catostomus macrocheilus x x 
CyprinodontidaeBanded killifish Fundulus diaphanus x x 
GasterosteidaeThreespine stickleback Gasterosteus aculeatus x x 
PercidaeYellow perch Perca flavescens x 
CottidaePrickly sculpin Cottus asper x xPacific staghorn 
sculpin Leptocottus armatus x Unidentified sculpin Cottidae x 
PleuronectidaeStarry flounder Platichthys stellatus x xTable of Contents
```
#### Nadine Weiler, Respondent, v. William Weiler, Appellant.

Motion by appellant for a stay, pending appeal, denied. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld. Brennan, Hill and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
242.7301 General. ( a ) The administrative contracting officer (ACO) is responsible for determining the allowability of insurance/pension costs in Government contracts and for determining the need for a Contractor/Insurance Pension Review (CIPR). Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA) insurance/pension specialists and Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) auditors assist ACOs in making these determinations, conduct CIPRs when needed, and perform other routine audits as authorized under FAR 42.705 and 52.215-2. A CIPR is a DCMA/DCAA joint review that— ( 1 ) Provides an in-depth evaluation of a contractor's— ( i ) Insurance programs;
( ii ) Pension plans;
( iii ) Other deferred compensation plans; and
( iv ) Related policies, procedures, practices, and costs; or
( 2 ) Concentrates on specific areas of the contractor's insurance programs, pension plans, or other deferred compensation plans.
( b ) DCMA is the DoD Executive Agent for the performance of all CIPRs.
( c ) DCAA is the DoD agency designated for the performance of contract audit responsibilities related to Cost Accounting Standards administration as described in FAR subparts 30.2 and 30.6 as they relate to a contractor's insurance programs, pension plans, and other deferred compensation plans.
[71 FR 9273, Feb. 23, 2006, as amended at 77 FR 76940, Dec. 31, 2012; 82 FR 61481, Dec. 28, 2017]
```

[111th Congress Public Law 129]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[[Page 123 STAT. 3488]]

Public Law 111-129
111th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
76 Brookside Avenue in Chester, New York, as the ``1st Lieutenant Louis 
      Allen Post Office''. <<NOTE: Jan. 29, 2010 -  [H.R. 2877]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. 1ST LIEUTENANT LOUIS ALLEN POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 76 Brookside Avenue in Chester, New York, shall be known and 
designated as the ``1st Lieutenant Louis Allen Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``1st 
Lieutenant Louis Allen Post Office''.

    Approved January 29, 2010.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 2877:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 155 (2009):
            Oct. 13, considered and passed House.
            Dec. 21, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
INCLUDED IN SUCH REPORT.
</LEGEND>

       
<S>                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>         12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>     DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>          DEC-31-1996

<CASH>                        6,030,217 
<SECURITIES>                    374,085 
<RECEIVABLES>                15,330,082 
<ALLOWANCES>                       0    
<INVENTORY>                        0    
<CURRENT-ASSETS>             21,734,384 
<PP&E>                      238,208,441 
<DEPRECIATION>                     0    
<TOTAL-ASSETS>              280,595,580 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>        67,445,869 
<BONDS>                     384,098,834 
<COMMON>                           0    
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>              0    
<PREFERRED>                        0    
<OTHER-SE>                 (176,015,574)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>280,595,580 
<SALES>                      68,293,433 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>             69,093,943 
<CGS>                              0    
<TOTAL-COSTS>                51,021,847 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              1,019,829 
<LOSS-PROVISION>             17,600,000 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>           39,959,842 
<INCOME-PRETAX>             (40,507,575)
<INCOME-TAX>                       0    
<INCOME-CONTINUING>          42,099,222 
<DISCONTINUED>                5,484,249 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                    0    
<CHANGES>                          0    
<NET-INCOME>                 47,583,471 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                    125.25 
<EPS-DILUTED>                    125.25 
        


</TABLE>