alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 907 

To authorize the modification of the Second Division Memorial, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 7, 2017 

Ms. MURKOWSKI introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To authorize the modification of the Second Division 

Memorial, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Second Division Memo5 rial Modification Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. MODIFICATION OF THE SECOND DIVISION MEMO7 RIAL. 

8 (a) AUTHORIZATION.—The Second Indianhead Divi9 sion Association, Inc., Scholarship and Memorials Foun10 dation, an organization described in section 501(c)(3) of 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 907 IS

1 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and exempt from tax2 ation under section 501(a) of that Code, may place addi3 tional commemorative elements or engravings on the 

4 raised platform or stone work of the existing Second Divi5 sion Memorial located in President’s Park, between 17th 

6 Street Northwest and Constitution Avenue in the District 

7 of Columbia, to further honor the members of the Second 

8 Infantry Division who have given their lives in service to 

9 the United States. 

10 (b) APPLICATION OF COMMEMORATIVE WORKS

11 ACT.—Chapter 89 of title 40, United States Code (com12 monly known as the ‘‘Commemorative Works Act’’), shall 

13 apply to the design and placement of the commemorative 

14 elements or engravings authorized under subsection (a). 

15 (c) FUNDING.—Federal funds may not be used for 

16 modifications of the Second Division Memorial authorized 

17 under subsection (a). 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### Mary E. Norris, Respondent, v. Leon D. Mitrany et al., Individually and Doing Business as Amms Land Co., Appellants.

In an action under article 15 of the Real Property Law to bar defendants’ claim of title, the defendants appeal: (1) from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated October 31, 1962, which granted plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and denied defendants’ cross motion for summary judgment; and (2) from the judgment entered November 9, 1962 upon such order in plaintiff’s favor. Order and judgment reversed, without costs; plaintiff’s motion denied; defendants’ cross motion for summary judgment granted; and judgment directed in favor of defendants, without costs. The question is whether in Suffolk County there is a three-year or a five-year period within which occupied land may be redeemed from a tax sale, where no notice to redeem is given by the tax lien purchaser. Here, four years after the sale on November 18, 1957, the plaintiff owner redeemed the property. In our opinion, under the circumstances in the ease at bar, the 1949 amendment to section 137 of the Tax Law reduced the former period of redemption in Suffolk County from five to three years *(Johnson*v. *Smith,*178 Misc. 236; *Matter of Saman Molding Corp.*v. *Burns,*2 A D 2d 994). That amendment eliminated from section 137 of the Tax Law the provision that the owner could redeem “within two years from the expiration of the year allowed by law for the redemption thereof, and not thereafter,” and substituted therefor the provision that the period of redemption is “within thirty-six months after the sale, and not thereafter”. Beldoek, P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      In connection with the Annual Report of Maxtor Corporation (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 28, 2002, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Paul J. Tufano,
President, Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 ("Section 906"), that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

March 28, 2003

                                             /s/ Paul J. Tufano
                                     ----------------------------------
                                     Paul J. Tufano
                                     President, Chief Executive Officer
                                     and Acting Chief Financial Officer

[A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.]
PEKlNAREACHAttaeR^FCOMMEftC Ey--p\^^^ < reki n Are a Ihambero f ommerc e >

. 

# ^m ^

Marc h12,201 0

Th e Honorabl e Raymon dH . LaHoo d Secretary U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Ave , S E Washington , D C 2059 0 RE : Docke t

DOT-OST-2010- 1 Dear Mr . Secretary : Than k yo u fo r th e opportunit y t o expres s m y suppor t fo r th e applicatio nfo r

antitrus t immunit y an dpropose djoin t busines s agreemen t

filedb y America nAirline s an dJapa n Airlines . Th e propose dallianc e betwee nthes e tw o airline s i s vita l for oneworl dt o compet e effectivel y withth e Star an dSkyTea malliance . Thi s increase dinterallianc e competitio n wil l i n tur n enhanc e th e benefit s o f th e Department' s Ope nSkie s polic y - first b y solidifyin g U.S.-Japa n Ope nSkies , the nb y servin g a s afoundatio nfo r fiirther liberalizatio nacros s Asia . After athoroug hreview , I encourag e th e Departmen t o f Transportatio nt o approv e thi s applicatio n a s i t

woul denabl e thes e oneworl dallianc e airline s t o wor k closel y togethe r

t o delive r highl y competitiv e ai r

transportatio nservices . Approva l fo r AA/JA Lallianc e wil l hav e apositiv e impac t

o n ai r trave l b y offerin g customer s mor e service , schedulin g an d pricin g option s an dwil l hel p t o ensur e tha t customer s continu e t o benefi t fromhavin g thre e competitiv e ai r

alliance s t o choos e from. 1 lu^g e yo u t o quickl y approv e thi s application . Sincerely , Willia mT . Flemin

j Executiv e Directo r

Peki n Are a Chambe rof Commerc e • 402 Cour t Stree t • P.O. Bo x63

6 • Pekin , I L 61555-063 6 • Phon e 309-346-210 6 • Fa x309-346-210 4 • E-Mail : chamber@pekin.ne t
#### 1504.804 Closeout of contract files.
Exhibit 32(c)








CERTIFICATION
FURNISHED PURSUANT TO




18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,




AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q of Carolina Power & Light Company (the “Company”) for the
period ending September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Lloyd M. Yates, President and
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:




(1)           the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)           the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.











/s/ Lloyd M.
Yates


Lloyd M.
Yates


President
and Chief Executive Officer


November
5, 2008








This
certification is being furnished and shall not be deemed filed by the Company
for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
or incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, or the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
Case: 1:12-cr-00328 Document #: 22 Filed: 08/03/12 Page 1 of 7 PageID #:52
Case: 1:12-cr-00328 Document #: 22 Filed: 08/03/12 Page 2 of 7 PageID #:53
Case: 1:12-cr-00328 Document #: 22 Filed: 08/03/12 Page 3 of 7 PageID #:54
Case: 1:12-cr-00328 Document #: 22 Filed: 08/03/12 Page 4 of 7 PageID #:55
Case: 1:12-cr-00328 Document #: 22 Filed: 08/03/12 Page 5 of 7 PageID #:56
Case: 1:12-cr-00328 Document #: 22 Filed: 08/03/12 Page 6 of 7 PageID #:57
Case: 1:12-cr-00328 Document #: 22 Filed: 08/03/12 Page 7 of 7 PageID #:58
No. 8047.

#### Myers *v.*Weber et al.

(Decided October 27, 1903.)

Error to Circuit Court of Williams county.

*Messrs. Boothman & Newcomer*and *Messrs. Conway £• Dujfey,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. John M. Killits,*for defendants in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Burket, C. J., Davis, Shauck, Price and Crew,. JJ., concur.
#### In the Matter of Melvin G. Hazard, Respondent, v. Board of Education, Horseheads Central School District No. 1, Horseheads, Appellant.

Motion to allow the New York State Teachers Association to file a brief *amicus curies*granted.
SERVED: SEPTEMBER 28, 2016 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

TRANS TIME EXPRESS 

DOCKET NO. FAA-2012-1260 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

NOTICE OF PREHEARING TELEPHONE CONFERENCE 

A Prehearing Telephone Conference is scheduled on October 26, 2016, at 2:00p.m., 

Eastern Daylight Time. Each party should be prepared to discuss all facts at issue. Each party 

shall deliver to the Judge, no later than 5:00p.m., Eastern Daylight Time, on October 11, 2016, a 

copy of any documents previously provided to the other party but not the Judge. 1 

Pursuant to Section 556 of the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. § 556(c)(8), each 

party shall be represented by someone who has authority to negotiate concerning resolution of all 

issues in controversy. The parties shall access the Conference by dialing 877-402-9753 and, 

when prompted, entering the access code 4063260 . 

SO ORDERED. 

Attachment - Service List 

'r~,.· 

...... ····. 

,/(',/ 'j / / / 

I ,.(.'l'f .,.;_;.,· 

f. .. ~:/ ~-

/" VI 

_ .. .-.::Ronnie A. Yoder 

Chief Administrative w Judge c ........ / 

1 Any document(s) provided pursuant to this Notice shall be contained in one or more three-ring binders, 

identified by tabbed dividers, and listed in a table of contents. The party providing any document(s) pursuant to this 

Notice shall file a copy with FAA Dockets and serve a copy on the other party. 
Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S. W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

AMENDED SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC--430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1 OO<f 

Docket No. FAA-2012-1260 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

ONE COPY (COURTESY COPY VIA EMAIL OR FAX; THEN SERVICE BY MAIL) 

Cameron Niakan, Respondent's Counsel 

10101 Grosvenor Pl. #620 

Rockville, MD 20852 

TEL: 202-276-4726 

FAX: (None Provided) 

EMAIL: cn@Niakanlaw.com 

Charles Raley and Sabrina Jawed, Complainant's Counsel 

Enforcement Division, AGC-300 

Office of the Chief Counsel, FAA 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

TEL: 202-267-3357 

FAX: 202-267-5106 

The Honorable Ronnie A. Yoder, 

Chief Administrative Law Judge 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2142 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

2 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

-2-
```

[111th Congress Public Law 150]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[[Page 124 STAT. 1026]]

Public Law 111-150
111th Congress

                                 An Act

 
 To permit the use of previously appropriated funds to extend the Small 
 Business Loan Guarantee Program, and for other purposes. <<NOTE: Mar. 
                       26, 2010 -  [H.R. 4938]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF SMALL BUSINESS LOAN GUARANTEE PROGRAM.

    (a) Authority to Use Funds.--Up to $40,000,000 of the amount made 
available under the heading ``Small Business Administration--Business 
Loans Program Account'' in title V of division C of the Consolidated 
Appropriations Act, 2010 (Public Law 111-117) also may be utilized for 
fee reductions and eliminations under section 501 of title V of division 
A of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Public Law 111-
5) and for the cost of guaranteed loans under section 502 of such title. 
Such costs, including the cost of modifying such loans, shall be as 
defined in section 502 of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974.
    (b) Extension of Sunset Date.--Section 502(f) of title V of division 
A of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Public Law 111-
5) <<NOTE: 123 Stat. 153.>> is amended by striking ``March 28, 2010'' 
and inserting ``April 30, 2010''.

    Approved March 26, 2010.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 4938:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 156 (2010):
            Mar. 25, considered and passed House and Senate.

                                  <all>
```
22.1901 Definitions. As used in this subpart— *United States* means the 50 States, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, the Northern Mariana Islands, American Samoa, Guam, the U.S. Virgin Islands, Johnston Island, Wake Island, and the outer Continental Shelf as defined in the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (43 U.S.C. 1331, *et seq.*).
*Worker* (in accordance with 29 CFR 23.20)— ( 1 ) ( i ) Means any person engaged in performing work on, or in connection with, a contract covered by Executive Order 14026, and ( A ) Whose wages under such contract are governed by the Fair Labor Standards Act (29 U.S.C. chapter 8), the Service Contract Labor Standards statute (41 U.S.C. chapter 67), or the Wage Rate Requirements (Construction) statute (40 U.S.C. chapter 31, subchapter IV),
( B ) Other than individuals employed in a bona fide executive, administrative, or professional capacity, as those terms are defined in 29 CFR part 541,
( C ) Regardless of the contractual relationship alleged to exist between the individual and the employer.
( ii ) Includes workers performing on, or in connection with, the contract whose wages are calculated pursuant to special certificates issued under 29 U.S.C. 214(c).
( iii ) Also includes any person working on, or in connection with, the contract and individually registered in a bona fide apprenticeship or training program registered with the Department of Labor's Employment and Training Administration, Office of Apprenticeship, or with a State Apprenticeship Agency recognized by the Office of Apprenticeship.
( 2 ) ( i ) A worker performs *on* a contract if the worker directly performs the specific services called for by the contract; and
( ii ) A worker performs *in connection with* a contract if the worker's work activities are necessary to the performance of a contract but are not the specific services called for by the contract.
[79 FR 74550, Dec. 15, 2014, as amended at 85 FR 67627, Oct. 23, 2020; 87 FR 4122, Jan. 26, 2022]
No. 8009.

#### The Northwestern National Insurance Co. *v.*Green.

(Decided January 19, 1904.)

Error to Circuit Court of Ashtabula county.

*.Messrs. Hoyt & Munsell,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr, Charles Lawyer; Mr. Perry*and *Mr. Roberts,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Burket, C. J., Davis and Price, JJ., concur.
#### 225.7004-1 Definitions.

As used in this section—

*National technology and industrial base* means the persons and organizations that are engaged in production activities conducted within the United States, Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (United Kingdom). (10 U.S.C. 4801)

*Star tracker* means a navigational tool used in a satellite weighing more than 400 pounds whose principal purpose is to support the national security, defense, or intelligence needs of the U.S. Government.

[89 FR 46813, May 30, 2024]
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 923 

To exempt certain financial institutions from regulations issued under the 

Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 24, 2017 

Mr. KENNEDY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs 

A BILL 

To exempt certain financial institutions from regulations 

issued under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and 

Consumer Protection Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Reforming Finance 

5 for Local Economies Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EXEMPTION FROM REGULATIONS. 

7 (a) DEFINITION.—In this section, the term ‘‘financial 

8 institution’’ means a bank, a credit union, or a savings 

9 association, as those terms are defined in section 2 of the 

10 Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer ProtecVerDate Sep 11 2014 23:46 Apr 24, 2017 Jkt 069200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S923.IS S923

SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 923 IS

1 tion Act (12 U.S.C. 5301), that has not more than 

2 $10,000,000,000 in total consolidated assets. 

3 (b) EXEMPTION.—No regulation issued under the 

4 Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protec5 tion Act (12 U.S.C. 5301 et seq.) or any amendment made 

6 by that Act shall apply to a financial institution. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Angelo Fazio, Appellant.

In a *coram nobis*proceeding, defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated December 4, 1962, which denied after a hearing his application to vacate a judgment of the former County Court, Kings County, rendered June 4, 1947 after a jury trial, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, and sentencing him as a second felony offender to serve a term of 30 to 60 years. The judgment of conviction was previously affirmed by this court (272 App. Div. 1061; motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied, December 9, 1947 [Fuld, J.]). Order affirmed. We are of the opinion that the rule enunciated in *People*v. *Mangi (10 N*Y 2d 86) is distinguishable from this case because at the trial of this defendant it was his own counsel who prevented the defendant’s accomplice, the witness Daly, from disclosing all the facts. This disclosure, if permitted, might have revealed not only that the prosecutor had told Daly that if he testified as a People’s witness his co-operation would *be*called to the court’s attention at his sentencing, but also that this defendant was implicated in another crime or crimes. Beldock, P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Hill and Rabin, JJ., concur.
Case: 1:12-cv-00712 Document #: 6-1 Filed: 02/08/12 Page 1 of 14 PageID #:40
Case: 1:12-cv-00712 Document #: 6-1 Filed: 02/08/12 Page 2 of 14 PageID #:41
Case: 1:12-cv-00712 Document #: 6-1 Filed: 02/08/12 Page 3 of 14 PageID #:42
Case: 1:12-cv-00712 Document #: 6-1 Filed: 02/08/12 Page 4 of 14 PageID #:43
Case: 1:12-cv-00712 Document #: 6-1 Filed: 02/08/12 Page 5 of 14 PageID #:44
Case: 1:12-cv-00712 Document #: 6-1 Filed: 02/08/12 Page 6 of 14 PageID #:45
Case: 1:12-cv-00712 Document #: 6-1 Filed: 02/08/12 Page 7 of 14 PageID #:46
Case: 1:12-cv-00712 Document #: 6-1 Filed: 02/08/12 Page 8 of 14 PageID #:47
Case: 1:12-cv-00712 Document #: 6-1 Filed: 02/08/12 Page 9 of 14 PageID #:48
Case: 1:12-cv-00712 Document #: 6-1 Filed: 02/08/12 Page 10 of 14 PageID #:49
Case: 1:12-cv-00712 Document #: 6-1 Filed: 02/08/12 Page 11 of 14 PageID #:50
Case: 1:12-cv-00712 Document #: 6-1 Filed: 02/08/12 Page 12 of 14 PageID #:51
Case: 1:12-cv-00712 Document #: 6-1 Filed: 02/08/12 Page 13 of 14 PageID #:52
Case: 1:12-cv-00712 Document #: 6-1 Filed: 02/08/12 Page 14 of 14 PageID #:53
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 64 Placed on Calendar Senate (PCS)]

<DOC>

                                                       Calendar No. 630
115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. J. RES. 64

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
  United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of the 
 Treasury relating to ``Returns by Exempt Organizations and Returns by 
                  Certain Non-Exempt Organizations''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 24, 2018

Mr. Tester (for himself, Mr. Wyden, Mrs. McCaskill, Mr. Whitehouse, Mr. 
  Markey, Mrs. Gillibrand, Mr. Udall, Mr. Van Hollen, Mr. Durbin, Mr. 
   Reed, Mr. Blumenthal, Mrs. Shaheen, Ms. Klobuchar, Mr. Leahy, Mr. 
Heinrich, Ms. Baldwin, Ms. Smith, Mr. Cardin, Mr. King, Mr. Bennet, Mr. 
Donnelly, Mr. Casey, Mr. Sanders, Ms. Stabenow, Ms. Hassan, Mr. Jones, 
 Ms. Heitkamp, Mr. Peters, Mr. Menendez, Ms. Hirono, Ms. Cortez Masto, 
  Mr. Booker, Mr. Kaine, Mr. Murphy, and Mr. Merkley) introduced the 
 following joint resolution; which was read twice and referred to the 
                          Committee on Finance

                            October 11, 2018

  Committee discharged, by petition, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 802(c), and 
                         placed on the calendar

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
  United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of the 
 Treasury relating to ``Returns by Exempt Organizations and Returns by 
                  Certain Non-Exempt Organizations''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Department of the Treasury relating to ``Returns 
by Exempt Organizations and Returns by Certain Non-Exempt 
Organizations'' (Rev. Proc. 2018-38 (July 16, 2018)), received in the 
House of Representatives on July 26, 2018, and received in the Senate 
on July 30, 2018, and such rule shall have no force or effect.

                                                       Calendar No. 630

115th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                             S. J. RES. 64

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
  United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of the 
 Treasury relating to ``Returns by Exempt Organizations and Returns by 
                  Certain Non-Exempt Organizations''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            October 11, 2018

  Committee discharged, by petition, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 802(c), and 
                         placed on the calendar
```