alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 26 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 26

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
    United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of 
           Education relating to teacher preparation issues.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 2, 2017

 Mr. Sasse (for himself, Mr. Alexander, Mr. Cassidy, Mr. Grassley, Mr. 
   Heller, Mr. Lee, Mr. McConnell, Mr. Perdue, Mr. Roberts, and Mr. 
Inhofe) introduced the following joint resolution; which was read twice 
and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
    United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of 
           Education relating to teacher preparation issues.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Department of Education relating to teacher 
preparation issues (published at 81 Fed. Reg. 75494 (October 31, 
2016)), and such rule shall have no force or effect.
                                 <all>
```
The Honorable Lyle E. Strom, United States District Judge for

the District of Nebraska.

___________

No. 96-2019

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* District of Nebraska.

Theodore James Foster, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellant. *

___________

 Submitted: September 6, 1996

 Filed: September 18, 1996

___________

Before FAGG, WOLLMAN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Theodore James Foster appeals the 18-month sentence imposed on him

by the district court following his guilty plea to being a felon in

1

possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1) and

924(a)(2). We affirm.

Foster argues the district court erred in denying him an acceptanceof-responsibility reduction under U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1. We conclude, however,

that the district court did not clearly err in finding Foster falsely

stated the guns belonged to his son, and thus in refusing to grant Foster

the reduction. See United States v. Evans, 51 F.3d 764, 766 (8th Cir.

1995) (standard of review); U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1, comment. (n.1(a)) (defendant

who falsely denies relevant conduct which sentencing court determines to

be true has
-2-

acted in manner inconsistent with acceptance of responsibility). We reject

Foster's argument that the district court erred in not conducting an

evidentiary hearing on the acceptance-of-responsibility reduction, as

Foster did not offer any evidence to support this reduction. See United

States v. Morales, 923 F.2d 621, 628 (8th Cir. 1991) (defendant bears

burden for establishing acceptance of responsibility).

Foster also argues that his counsel below was ineffective for not

making the district court aware that she was asking it to grant Foster a

downward departure under U.S.S.G. § 5H1.4 based on Foster's physical

condition. Although a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel usually

cannot be asserted for the first time on direct appeal, we conclude the

record belies Foster's contention that counsel's performance at the

sentencing hearing was deficient, as counsel asked the court to review

Foster's medical records and specifically made reference to section 5H1.4.

See United States v. Williams, 897 F.2d 1430, 1434 (8th Cir. 1990)

(considering ineffective-assistance claim on direct appeal because record

was fully developed at post-trial hearing).

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
----

----

| $874,992.61 (the “Principal Amount”) |                                  Date: March 1, 2011 |
|--------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                             |                                                                                                                                                                                                                      |

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

|   | PHOTOMEDEX, INC. |                                |
|--------|------------------|-------------------------------------|
|   |             |                                |   |
|   | By:              | /s/ Christina L. Allgeier      |   |
|   |             | Name: Christina L. Allgeier    |   |
|   |             | Title: Chief Financial Officer |   |
|   |             |                                |   |

----

----
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 50 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 50

 Relating to the disapproval of the proposed foreign military sale to 
   the Government of Georgia of Javelin Missiles and Javelin Command 
                             Launch Units.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            December 7, 2017

  Mr. Paul introduced the following joint resolution; which was read 
        twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
 Relating to the disapproval of the proposed foreign military sale to 
   the Government of Georgia of Javelin Missiles and Javelin Command 
                             Launch Units.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the issuance of a letter 
of offer with respect to any of the following proposed sales to the 
Government of Georgia (described in the certification Transmittal No. 
17-59, sent to the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the 
chairman of the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate pursuant 
to section 36(b)(1) of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 
2776(b)(1)) on February 17, 2017, is hereby prohibited:
            (1) The proposed sale of four hundred and ten (410) Javelin 
        Missiles and related equipment and support (Transmittal 
        Numbered 17-59).
            (2) The proposed sale of seventy-two (72) Javelin Command 
        Launch Units (CLUs) and related equipment and support 
        (Transmittal Numbered 17-59).
                                 <all>
```
#### 201.106 OMB approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act.

See PGI 201.106 for a list of the information collection and recordkeeping requirements contained in this regulation that have been approved by the Office of Management and Budget.

[80 FR 67255, Oct. 30, 2015]
#### 225.7502 Procedures.

If the Balance of Payments Program applies to the acquisition, follow the procedures at PGI 225.7502.

[71 FR 62566, Oct. 26, 2006]
<PAGE>   1


                                                                          PART I
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

                       BRUSH WELLMAN INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                        COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                SECOND QUARTER ENDED                  SIX MONTHS ENDED
                                             ---------------------------        ----------------------------
                                               July 27          June 28           July 27         June 28
                                                1997              1996             1997             1996
                                               --------         --------          --------        --------
<S>                                          <C>              <C>              <C>              <C>        
Primary Diluted:
  Average shares outstanding                  16,293,343       15,872,613       16,290,635       15,912,605

  Dilutive stock options based
           on the treasury stock method
           using average market price            249,783          173,915          196,652          177,027
                                             -----------      -----------      -----------      -----------

                         TOTALS               16,543,126       16,046,528       16,487,287       16,089,632
                                             ===========      ===========      ===========      ===========

  Net Income                                 $ 7,489,000      $ 8,144,000      $13,979,000      $13,300,000

  Per share amount                           $      0.45      $      0.51      $      0.85      $      0.83
                                             ===========      ===========      ===========      ===========


Fully Diluted:
  Average shares outstanding                  16,293,343       15,872,613       16,290,635       15,912,605

  Dilutive stock options based
           on the treasury stock method
           using average market price            287,492          199,129          284,804          202,988
                                             -----------      -----------      -----------      -----------

                         TOTALS               16,580,835       16,071,742       16,575,439       16,115,593
                                             ===========      ===========      ===========      ===========

  Net Income                                 $ 7,489,000      $ 8,144,000      $13,979,000      $13,300,000

  Per share amount                           $      0.45      $      0.51      $      0.84      $      0.83
                                             ===========      ===========      ===========      ===========
</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 14 (Monday, January 25, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 6888]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-01594]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

TIME AND DATE: Thursday, January 28, 2021 at 10:00 a.m.

PLACE: Virtual meeting. Note: Because of the covid-19 pandemic, we will 
conduct the open meeting virtually. If you would like to access the 
meeting, see the instructions below.

STATUS: This meeting will be open to the public. to access the virtual 
meeting, go to the commission's website www.fec.gov and click on the 
banner to be taken to the meeting page.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 
Draft Advisory Opinion 2020-06: Escobar
Audit Division Recommendation Memorandum on the Mississippi Republican 
Party (A17-15)
Management and Administrative Matters

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Judith Ingram, Press Officer; 
Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

    Authority: Government in the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552b.

Laura E. Sinram,
Acting Secretary and Clerk of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2021-01594 Filed 1-21-21; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6715-01-P
Exhibit
32.2





SECTION
906 CERTIFICATION





I,
Dennis M. McGrath, Chief Financial Officer of PhotoMedex, Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the "Company"), do hereby certify, in accordance with 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as created pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:





(1) the
accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended
December 31, 2008 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended; and





(2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





PHOTOMEDEX, INC.Dated:
      March 20, 2009
                By:
                /s/ Dennis M. McGrathDennis M. McGrathChief Financial Officer





A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Section
906”), or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting
the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to PhotoMedex, Inc.
and will be retained by PhotoMedex, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### In the Matter of Tessie Moon, a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant.

Motion to dismiss appeal granted unless record and five copies of appellant’s briefs are filed and one copy served on respondent’s attorney on or before September 25, 1963. Case added to term commencing October 22, 1963. Cross motion of appellant for leave to prosecute appeal as a poor person denied. Memorandum: A printed case on appeal or a printed brief is not required in an appeal under the provisions of the Family Court Act. (Family Ct. Act, § 1016.) If this appeal is not argued at the October 1963 Term, the attorney for respondent should apply to the Justice of this court who granted the stay for an order vacating such stay and directing the implementation of the order appealed from. (Cf. *People*v. *Gorney,*18 A D 2d 964.)
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

** **

** **

**CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT**

** **

I, John R. Howe, Executive Vice President, Chief FinancialOfficer of The Cato Corporation (the “Company”), certify, pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, that on the date of this Certification:

 

1.    theForm 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended October 30, 2010 (the“Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.  the information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and      results of operations of the Company.

Dated:December 8, 2010

|   |                     |
|--------|--------------------------|
|   | /s/ John R. Howe         |
|   | John R. Howe             |
|   | Executive Vice President |
|   | Chief Financial Officer  |

 

 

28

 

----
215.101-70 Best value when acquiring tents or other temporary structures. ( a ) In accordance with section 368 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Pub. L. 112-81), when acquiring tents or other temporary structures for use by the Armed Forces, the contracting officer shall award contracts that provide the best value. Temporary structures covered by this paragraph are nonpermanent buildings, including tactical shelters, nonpermanent modular or pre-fabricated buildings, or portable or relocatable buildings, such as trailers or equipment configured for occupancy (see also 246.270-2). Determination of best value includes consideration of the total life-cycle costs of such tents or structures, including the costs associated with any equipment, fuel, or electricity needed to heat, cool, or light such tents or structures (see FAR 7.105(a)(3)(i) and PGI 207.105(a)(3)(i)).
( b ) The requirements of this section apply to any agency or department that acquires tents or other temporary structures on behalf of DoD (see FAR 17.503(d)(2)).
[78 FR 13545, Feb. 28, 2013]
U.S. Dept Commerce/NOAA/NMFS/NWFSC/Publications

Table A-1.Concentrations, ng/g (ppb) wet weight, of aromatic contaminants in stomach contents of juvenile chinook salmon sampled in 1989. - a,b,c,d,e,f,g,j

Footnotes follow 

Table A-1. Continued.Concentrations, ng/g (ppb) wet weight, of aromatic contaminants in stomach contents of juvenile chinook salmon sampled in 1989. - a,b,c,d,e,f,g,j 

Footnotes follow 

Table A-1. Continued. Concentrations, ng/g (ppb) wet weight, of aromatic contaminants in stomach contents of juvenile chinook salmon sampled in 1989. - a,b,c,d,e,f,g,j 

Footnotes:

a The concentrations of the analytes and the percent recoveries of the surrogate standards were calculated using hexamethylbenzene as the internal standard.

b The alkylated compounds are not in the calibration solution. The response factors of the parent compound, e.g., naphthalene, phenanthrene are used to calculate the alkylated compounds, e.g., C1, C2, C3, C4 - naphthalenes and C1, C2, C3, C4 - phenanthrenes, respectively.

c Concentrations and initial identifications were determined using gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS) - multiple ion detection. 

d The "less than" symbol (<) indicates that the analyte was not detected in concentrations above the stated value. 

e Low molecular weight aromatic contaminants (LACs) and high molecular weight aromatic contaminants (HACs) are 2,3-ring aromatic compounds and 4,7-ring aromatic compounds, respectively.

f Concentrations less than 10 are rounded to one significant figure; concentrations greater than 10 are rounded to two significant figures.

g Percent recoveries for the internal standards (surrogates) averaged 93%, CV = 16%, n = 81.

h The brackets indicate that due to the very small sample size the values should be considered semiquantitative.

i Benzo[k]fluoranthene and benzo[j]fluoranthene often coelute. This combined concentration is reported.

j The concentration of naphthalene was calculated using the surrogate standard naphthalene-d8; analytes from acenaphthylene through pyrene were calculated using acenaphthene-d10; analytes from benz[a]anthracene through benzo[ghi]perylene were calculated using benzo[a]pyrene-d12. The surrogate standards were used to calculate the concentrations of analytes so that the data can be compared to previously analyzed data.

k These samples are duplicate analyses. The data for the duplicate samples were somewhat different which implies that the samples were not homogeneous.

l Standard reference material from the National Institute of Science and Technology.

m RSD is the relative standard deviation which is the standard deviation divided by the mean and expressed as a percent.

Table of Contents
**Exhibit 23.1**
**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**
We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8(Nos.: 333-08181, 333-61011, 333-87041, and 333-58742)and the Registration Statement on Form S-3(No. 333-106408) of Maxtor Corporation of our report dated March 9, 2005, relating to the financialstatements and financial statement schedule, management’s assessment of the effectiveness ofinternal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financialreporting, which appears in this Form 10-K.
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
San Jose, California
FY 2014 Annual Performance Report and FY 2016 Annual Performance Plan:  PDF (2,6M)

**APR Individual Sections:**

- Mission and Organizational Structure download filesPDF(305KB)
- About This Report and Overview download filesPDF (300KB)
- Performance Results Details download filesPDF (888KB)
- Performance Plan Summary download filesPDF (1.54MB)
- Appendix A: Data Validity and Verification download filesPDF (523KB)
- Appendix B: Additional Programs by Goal download filesPDF (315KB)
- Appendix C: Summary of Performance Evaluations Conducted During FY 2014 and Expected During FY 2015–16 download filesPDF (702KB)
- Appendix D: Selected Department Web Links and Education Resources download filesPDF (208KB)
- Appendix E: Glossary of Acronyms and Abbreviations download filesPDF (146KB)



President's FY 2016 Budget Request for the U.S. Department of Education

|Last Modified: 02/10/2015
|-------------------------
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000016104
<NAME> CAGLE'S, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-04-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-03-1999
<CASH>                                              69
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    20440
<ALLOWANCES>                                       830
<INVENTORY>                                      35614
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 58424
<PP&E>                                          116047
<DEPRECIATION>                                   51648
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  152529
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            32095
<BONDS>                                          32676
<COMMON>                                          4770
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                       66714
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    152529
<SALES>                                          86358
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 86358
<CGS>                                            76339
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    81343
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                (1065)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 627
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   5453
<INCOME-TAX>                                      2062
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               3391
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      3391
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .71
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .71


</TABLE>