alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 32.1**
**CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT**
I, John P. Derham Cato, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of The Cato Corporation,certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that onthe date of this Certification:
1.  the Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended April 30, 2005 (the “Report”) fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and 2.  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.
Dated: June 6, 2005         /s/ John P. Derham Cato   John P. Derham Cato   Chairman, President and
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Cagles, Inc. for the period ended January 01, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-Q), I, Mark M. Ham IV, Chief Financial Officer of Cagles, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:



1. The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, and



2. The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: February 11, 2004

By: /s/ Mark M. Ham IV

Mark M. Ham IV

Chief Financial Officer
#### 22.1307 Collective bargaining agreements.

If performance under the clause at 52.222-35, Equal Opportunity for Veterans, may necessitate a revision of a collective bargaining agreement, the contracting officer must advise the affected labor unions that the Department of Labor will give them appropriate opportunity to present their views. However, neither the contracting officer nor any representative of the contracting officer may discuss with the contractor or any labor representative any aspect of the collective bargaining agreement.

[66 FR 53488, Oct. 22, 2001, as amended at 75 FR 60251, Sept. 29, 2010]
[No. 9202.

Department One.

April 24, 1911.]

#### W. M. Everett, *Appellant*v. J. B. Sweatt, *Respondent.**1*

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Spokane county, Kennan, J., entered June 8, 1910.

Affirmed.

*Monfort & Dodds*and *Lawrence Jack,*for appellant.

*Peacock & Ludden,*for respondent.

1

Reported in 115 Pac. 1135.

Per Curiam

This was an action upon a promissory note. The defendant pleaded the statute of limitations. The case was tried to the court sitting without a jury, and resulted in findings and a judgment in favor of the defendant. The case turned on a question of fact: namely, whether the defendant had been a resident of the state of Washington for a period of six years prior to the commencement of the action. To this point all the evidence was directed. While the record is not long, it would serve no useful purpose to review it here. We have carefully read it, and think it preponderates in favor of the finding of the court, rather than against it.'

The judgment is affirmed.
#### HILLQUIT et al. v. SUN PRINTING & PUBLISHING ASS’N.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.

January 17, 1906.)

Damages—Mistake in Publishing Summons.

One who makes a mistake in publishing a summons, which is discovered by plaintiff’s attorneys after three publications, is not liable for money expended or counsel fees for services in the second action, as on discovery of the mistake, the attorneys should have discontinued publication under the first order, and commenced de novo under a new order, so that only the expense of the three publications would have been lost.

Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Eleventh District.

Action by Morris Hillquit and another against the Sun Printing & Publishing Association. From a judgment dismissing the complaint, plaintiffs appeal.

Modified.

Argued before SCOTT, P. J., and BLANCHARD and DOW-LING, JJ.

J. Sidney Bernstein, for appellants.

Franklin Bartlett, for respondent.

*389PER CURIAM.

The justice was' clearly right in holding, that plaintiffs were not entitled to recover as damages any moneys expended or counsel fee for services in the second action of Meyer v. Meyer. The defendants’ mistake did not necessitate a second action. All that the plaintiffs need have done when they discovered the mistake in the publication of the summons was to have discontinued the effort to make substituted service under the first order, and commenced de novo under a new order. They would thus have lost only the expense of three publications in each of the newspapers named in the first order. As attorneys, they should have known that any attempt to amend the original order of publication nunc pro tunc must necessarily be futile. For the proportionate expense of advertising in the Sun and the Law Journal up to the time that plaintiffs discovered the error which defendant had made, they may be entitled to recover. All the expense incurred after that discovery is the plaintiffs’ own fault. The justice was right in rendering the judgment he did, because of *the stand taken by plaintiffs as to their claim for damages. Their complaint, however, is broad enough to permit them to recover the damages for which the defendant is justly liable, and an absolute judgment for defendant would bar a future recovery for such damages.

The judgment will therefore be modified, so as to be one of dismissal, with costs, without prejudice to a new action, and, as so modi.fied, will be affirmed, with costs.
225.7023-3 Exceptions. The restriction in section 225.7023-2 does not apply to acquisitions— ( a ) Of covered items for use outside of the United States;
( b ) At or below $150,000; or
( c ) ( 1 ) If the head of the contracting activity determines that a covered item of satisfactory quality and quantity, in the required form, cannot be procured as and when needed from nations other than a covered country to meet requirements at a reasonable price.
( 2 ) The contracting officer shall include a copy of any such determination in the contract file.
#### 1307.302 Policy.

The Department's competitive sourcing policy and procedures are set forth in CAM 1307.370.
Gray Wolf Population in the United States 

Eastern Gray Wolf Distinct Population Segment (current as of late winter of 2001-2002) 

Michigan - Upper Peninsula 278 

 - Isle Royale 17 

Minnesota 2445 (1998 estimate*) 

Wisconsin 323 

 Total 3,063

 

*Minnesota does not conduct an annual survey. 

Western Gray Wolf Distinct Population Segment (current as of December 2002) 

Northern Rocky Mountain Gray Wolf - natural recovery

Northwest Montana 108 (12 breeding packs) 

 

Northern Rocky Mountain Gray Wolf - Experimental Populations 

Central Idaho 285 (9 breeding packs) 

Yellowstone ecosystem 271 (23 breeding packs) 

 (Idaho/Wyoming/Montana) 

Southwestern Gray Wolf Distinct Population Segment (current as of July 2002) 

Mexican Gray Wolf - Experimental Population 

Arizona & New Mexico 21+ unknown number of pups ** 

** Since the reintroduction began in 1998, approximately 74 wolves have been released. Some of these 

have died or been killed and others have been returned to captivity. 

Alaska (not protected by ESA) 6,000-8,000
1S

‘UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
PRAQRTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
— ~*““RT EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

)
) No. rodhk 2 CR 4
v. ) 2 1
) Hon, Michael T. Mason
ODELL GIVENS, et al. )
)
ORDER

Upon the motion of the United States for a protective order pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P.
16(d)(1), it is hereby ordered as follows:

1. All Title III applications, affidavits, and orders produced by the government in
connection with this case, and all other investigative materials and reports disclosed by the
government in original or redacted form, may be utilized by the charged defendants and their counsel
solely in connection with the defense of this case and for no other purpose and in connection with
no other proceeding. The materials and their contents, and any notes, records or copies of any kind
that defense counsel or the charged defendants may make relating to the contents of materials
provided by the government shall not be disclosed either directly or indirectly, verbally or in writing,
to any person or entity other than the charged defendants, their counsel, such other persons as are
reasonably employed by them as may be necessary to prepare a defense, or such other persons as to
whom the Court may authorize disclosure. These restrictions do no apply to documents or materials
that are public record, including, but not limited to, transcripts of proceedings; documents,
recordings and other materials that have been received in evidence at public hearings or proceedings;

or documents or materials that are otherwise in the public domain.



2. Intentional violation of this Order is punishable as a contempt, and may result in the
imposition of civil and criminal sanctions. However, nothing contained in this protective order shall
preclude any party from applying to the Court for further relief or for modification of any provision

hereof.

ENTER:
\

4

HON. MICHAEL T. MASON
United States Magistrate Judge

gees 2a

-2-
S. Con. Res. 1 Agreed to January 3, 2017

One Hundred Fifteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE FIRST SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and seventeen 

Concurrent Resolution 

Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 

SECTION 1. REAUTHORIZATION OF JOINT COMMITTEE. 

Effective from January 3, 2017, the joint committee created 

by Senate Concurrent Resolution 28 (114th Congress), to make 

the necessary arrangements for the inauguration of the Presidentelect and the Vice President-elect of the United States, is continued 

with the same power and authority provided for in that resolution. 

SEC. 2. USE OF CAPITOL. 

Effective from January 3, 2017, the provisions of Senate 

Concurrent Resolution 29 (114th Congress), to authorize the use 

of the rotunda and Emancipation Hall of the Capitol by the Joint 

Congressional Committee on Inaugural Ceremonies in connection 

with the proceedings and ceremonies conducted for the inauguration 

of the President-elect and the Vice President-elect of the United 

States are continued with the same power and authority provided 

for in that resolution. 

Attest: 

Secretary of the Senate. 

Attest: 

Clerk of the House of Representatives.
IIA 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 50 

Relating to the disapproval of the proposed foreign military sale to the 

Government of Georgia of Javelin Missiles and Javelin Command Launch 

Units. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 7, 2017 

Mr. PAUL introduced the following joint resolution; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Relating to the disapproval of the proposed foreign military 

sale to the Government of Georgia of Javelin Missiles 

and Javelin Command Launch Units. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That the issuance of a letter of offer with respect to any 

4 of the following proposed sales to the Government of Geor5 gia (described in the certification Transmittal No. 17–59, 

6 sent to the Speaker of the House of Representatives and 

7 the chairman of the Committee on Foreign Relations of 

8 the Senate pursuant to section 36(b)(1) of the Arms ExVerDate Sep 11 2014 02:23 Dec 08, 2017 Jkt 079200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\SJ50.IS SJ50

lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•SJ 50 IS 

1 port Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2776(b)(1)) on February 17, 

2 2017, is hereby prohibited: 

3 (1) The proposed sale of four hundred and ten 

4 (410) Javelin Missiles and related equipment and 

5 support (Transmittal Numbered 17–59). 

6 (2) The proposed sale of seventy-two (72) Jav7 elin Command Launch Units (CLUs) and related 

8 equipment and support (Transmittal Numbered 17– 

9 59). 

Æ 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
# Map            Macau (Macao) Special Administrative Region .
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Federal Screw Works (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Quarterly
Report"), I, Thomas ZurSchmiede, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or
78o(d)); and

         (2) The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.

February 14, 2003

                                        /s/ Thomas ZurScmiede
                                        ---------------------------------------
                                        Thomas ZurSchmiede, President and Chief
                                        Executive Officer of Federal Screw Works
*Note:  These Congressional Budget Justifications do not include State tables. For the latest State tables, please visit the Department's State Tables page*.Volume I- Education for the Disadvantaged  PDF (1.4MB) 
- Impact Aid   PDF (1.2MB)
- School Improvement Programs  PDF (2.0MB)
- Safe Schools and Citizenship Education  PDF (2.0MB)
- Indian Education  PDF (1.2MB)  ****)
- Innovation and Improvement  PDF (1.9MB)
- English Language Acquisition  PDF (622KB)
- Infrastructure  PDF (1.6MB)
- Special Education  PDF (1.6MB)
- Rehabilitation Services  PDF (1.9MB)
Volume II- American Printing House for the Blind  PDF (73KB)
- National Technical Institute for the Deaf  PDF (172KB)
- Gallaudet University  PDF (228KB)
- Career, Technical, and Adult Education  PDF (1.4MB)
- Student Aid Overview  PDF (232KB)
- Student Financial Assistance  PDF (1.8MB)
- TEACH Grants  PDF (1.0MB)
- Student Loans Overview  PDF (1.2MB)
- Free Community College  PDF (2.7MB)
- Higher Education  PDF (2.7MB)
- Howard University  PDF (222KB)
- College Housing and Academic Facilities Loans Program Account  PDF (162KB)
- Historically Black College and University Capital Financing Program Account  PDF (301KB)
- Institute of Education Sciences  PDF (675KB)
- Salaries and Expenses Overview  PDF (553KB)
- Program Administration  PDF (1.4MB)
- Student Aid Administration  PDF (1.4MB)
- Office for Civil Rights  PDF (474KB)
- Office of Inspector General  PDF (343KB)
  Last Modified: 05/26/2021
U.S. District Court for the Northern District Of Illinois

Attorney Appearance Form

Case Title: Case Number: 

An appearance is hereby filed by the undersigned as attorney for:

Attorney name (type or print): 

Firm: 

Street address: 

City/State/Zip: 

Bar ID Number: Telephone Number: 

 Yes No

 Yes No

 Yes No

 Yes No

(See item 3 in instructions)

Email Address:

Are you acting as lead counsel in this case?

Are you acting as local counsel in this case?

Are you a member of the court’s trial bar?

If this case reaches trial, will you act as the trial attorney? 

If this is a criminal case, check your status. Retained Counsel

Appointed Counsel 

If appointed counsel, are you 

a 

 Federal Defender

 CJA Panel Attorney

______________________________________________________________________

In order to appear before this Court an attorney must either be a member in good standing of this Court’s 

general bar or be granted leave to appear pro hac vice as provided for by local rules 83.12 through 83.14. 

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Under 28 U.S.C.§1746, this 

statement under perjury has the same force and effect as a sworn statement made under oath.

Executed on 

Attorney signature: S/

(Use electronic signature if the appearance form is filed electronically.)

Revised 8/1/2015

Case: 1:12-cv-04428 Document #: 362 Filed: 05/04/18 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:24592
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 5.1.1

Eastern Division

David Gast

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:12−cv−03394

Honorable John A. Nordberg

Kane County, et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Thursday, May 16, 2013:

 MINUTE entry before Honorable Maria Valdez: Magistrate Judge Status and

Motion hearing held on 5/16/2013 regarding motion for protective order [32]. For the

reasons stated on the record, Defendants' Motion for protective order [32] is withdrawn. If

parties agreed with an HIPAA Protective Order the parties need not file a motion. The

parties are granted leave to submit to the Court a proposed agreed order through the

Court's email under Proposed_Order_Valdez@ilnd.uscourts.gov. Agreed discovery

schedule is granted as follows: Plaintiff is given until 6/13/13 to amend complaint.

Defendant has until 6/13/13 to respond to outstanding discovery. Plaintiff has until

7/15/13 to respond to discovery. Court inquires about settlement conference setting.

Parties shall continue to discuss settlement. Status hearing set for 7/11/2013 at 10:00

AM.Mailed notice(yp, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:12-cv-03394 Document #: 34 Filed: 05/16/13 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:78
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                        CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT


I, Larry C. Miller, Vice President-Finance and Chief Financial Officer of Butler
Manufacturing Company, certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1)  The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period
     ended June 30, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
     Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (15
     U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.




August 14, 2002                                /s/ Larry C. Miller
---------------------                          ---------------------------------
Dated                                          Larry C. Miller
                                               Vice President - Finance,
                                               and Chief Financial Officer
### FDMS Docket Number: FAA**- 2012**  **- 1224**  **Contacts.** With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed?

Organization Person Contacted **Date** Response **National Business Aircraft Association Eli Cotti**  6/11/12 **Regional Airline Associ ation**  6/11/12 **Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association Robert Hackman**  6/11/12 **ATA M Lopez**  6/11/12
Exhibit 32.1

       Form of Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63
                 of Title 18 of the United States Code


I, Joseph F. Kruy, the chief executive officer and chief financial officer of
Cambex Corporation, certify that

(i) This quarterly report on Form 10QSB for the fiscal quarter ended April 4,
2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and

(ii) The information contained in this quarterly report on Form 10QSB fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Cambex Corporation.


Dated: May 24, 2004          /s/ Joseph F. Kruy
                             Joseph F. Kruy
                             President and Treasurer
                             [principal executive officer and
                              principal financial officer]


This certification accompanies this quarterly report pursuant to section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the
Company for purposes of Section 10 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.
#### 1352.209-75 Title 13 and non-disclosure requirements.

As prescribed in 48 CFR 1309.507-2(e), insert the following clause:

# Title 13 and Non-Disclosure Requirements (APR 2010)

The Census Bureau's data are protected by Title 13 of the United States Code. The contractor may not use Title 13 data for any purpose other than the intended purpose for which it is supplied or obtained. All contractor personnel who will have access to Title 13 data must take an oath and complete the Census Bureau Form BC-1759 (Special Sworn Status) that requires nondisclosure of Title 13 data. An authorized Census employee or a Notary Public must administer the oath of nondisclosure.

(End of clause)

[75 FR 10570, Mar. 8, 2010; 75 FR 14496, Mar. 26, 2010]
EXHIBIT 32.1







CERTIFICATION

(pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)





In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 of Boeing Capital Corporation (the
Company) as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report) and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Walter E.
Skowronski, President and Director of the Company, certify that:

| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





|                  |  |  |  |                         
|----------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------
|February 28, 2005 |  |  |  | /s/ WALTER E. SKOWRONSKI
|                  |  |  |  | Walter E. Skowronski    
|                  |  |  |  | President and Director  



A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to Boeing Capital Corporation and will be retained by Boeing Capital Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**BF** IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 19 - 0 689 CITY OF MISSOULA ,

Plaintiff and Appellee , v. FATON SADIKU ,

Defendant and Appellant.

**GRANT OF EXTENSION** Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 30 - day extension of time, and good cause appearing therefor, Appellee is granted an extension of time to and including May 8 , 202 1 , within which to prepare, serve, and file its response brief .

Electronically signed by: Bowen Greenwood Clerk of the Supreme Court April 7 2021

04/07/2021

Case Number: DA 19-0689