alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(July 18, 1960)

#### The People of the State of New York v. Rafeal Mendez.

Motion for leave to appeal as a poor person granted insofar as to permit the appeal to be heard on the original record, without printing the same, except that a certified copy of the indictment shall be substituted in place of the original indictment, and upon typewritten or mimeographed appellant’s points, on condition that the appellant serves one copy of the typewritten or mimeographed appellant’s points upon the District Attorney of New York County and files 6 typewritten or 19 mimeographed copies of appellant’s points, together with the original record, with this court on or before October 4, 1960, with notice of argument for the November 1960 Term of this court, said appeal to be argued or submitted when reached. Michael A. Sehwind, Esq., of 63 Wall Street, New York, New York, is assigned as counsel for the appellant for the purposes of the appeal. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, McNally, Stevens and Noonan, JJ.
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, e xcept under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and col lateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3. 

## F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### JAN 22 2001 

### PATRICK FISHER Clerk UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT
JESUS JOHN HERNANDEZ,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v. COLORADO MOTOR VEHICLE DEALER BOARD; COLORADO STATE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE; COLORADO ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Defendants-Appellees. No. 00-1131 (D.C. No. 99-S-861) (D. Colo)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

Before BALDOCK , PORFILIO , and BRORBY , Circuit Judges.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, th is panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materiallyassist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.-2-

Jesus John Hernandez appeals from the district court ’s grant of summary judgment to defendants on his civil rights claims. In his complaint, appellant alleged that defendants violated his constitutional rights in connection with the denial of his application for a Motor Vehicle Sales person License and a subsequent representation to the United States Paro le Commission that he had falsified his application, resulting in the revocat ion of his parole and his reincarceration. The magistrate judge recommended that defendants’ motion to dismiss be construed as a motion for summary judgme nt and that it should be granted. After appellant’s objections, which the district court reviewed de novo, the court accepted the magistrate judge’s recommend ation and entered judgment for defendants. This appeal followed. We have jur isdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review the district court ’s grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same standards as that court pur suant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(c). See Simms v. Okla. ex rel. Dep’t of Mental Health & Substance Abuse Servs. , 165 F.3d 1321, 1326 (10th Cir.), cert. denied , 120 S. Ct. 53 (1999). On appeal, appellant contends that the district court 1) wrongly granted summary judgment on the basis of defendant Clark’s affidavit and in light of disputed issues of fact, 2) wrongly allowed late fi ling of Clark’s affidavit, 3) should have given him leave to amend his complaint, 4) wrongly rejected his due process and equal protection claims, and 5) imp roperly concluded that Clark-3-

was entitled to qualified immunity. After careful review of the entire record on appeal together with the parties briefs in light of the applicable law, we conclude that the district court correctly decided this case. Therefore, for subst antially the reasons stated in the district court ’s Memorandum Opinion and Order dated February 18, 2000, the judgment of the United State s District Court for the District of Colorado is AFFIRMED. The mandate shal l issue forthwith.

Entered for the Court

Bobby R. Baldock Circuit Judge
| Name                                                                                   |   | Percentage owned                                  |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------|
| Fushi Holdings, Inc.( Fushi Holdings)                                                  |   | 100%                                                   |
|                                                                                   |   |                                                   |
| Fushi International (Dalian) Bimetallic Cable Co., Ltd. (Fushi International (Dalian)) |   | 100%                                                   |
|                                                                                   |   |                                                   |
| Dalian Jinchuan Power Cable Co., Ltd.                                                  |   | 100%                                                   |
|                                                                                   |   |                                                   |
| Dalian Fushi Bimetallic Wire Manufacturing, Co., Ltd. (Dalian Fushi)                   |   | 0% (control is through acontractual relationship only) |
|                                                                                   |   |                                                   |
| Copperweld Bimetallic, LLC                                                             |   | 100%                                                   |
|                                                                                   |   |                                                   |
| Copperweld Bimetallic LLC, UK                                                          |   | 100%                                                   |

----
Battleground BEN
National

Cemetery

ie
4

be

=)

* = =
~ ; g 0
z \4 ~
Ey) Maryland
X | }
4 A | 1} il
x i , North
d
Noe
= Picnic tables, playgrounds and
P) parking lots to be improved
(0) westana (BB Non NPs ownership Earthworks r Existing Trail
. (No longer extant) OS liking / Biking)
i | NPS site - National Capital Parks - East [EJ Proposed visitor
Contact Facility Activity Center / O78. Walking Trail
w@ NPS site - Rock Creek Park ie Earthworks Education Center # Ss Route shown is conceptual)

(existing)
B NPS site - George Washington Memorila Parkway & Fort Dupont Improvements
');
	document.write('

The Policy and Program Studies Service’s (PPSS) mission focuses on supporting education policy decisions by providing analytic support and research and data expertise to the Assistant Secretary and program offices. Through these work streams, PPSS improves internal and external decision-making, optimizes programs for desired outcomes, generates efficiencies to reduce reporting and other burdens for stakeholders, and promotes high-quality and open data.

Within PPSS, the Evidence Division provides rigorous and independent evidence using well-established methods to measure and report results on program and policy questions. The Analytics Division exploits cutting-edge and emerging methods such as machine learning and artificial intelligence for program optimization and the development of analytical products. The Data Management Division serves to standardize, improve, and democratize the Department’s data assets.

- **Accountability, Assessment, and Title I** (includes Title I National Assessments)
- **Teachers and Leaders** New Reports Available
- **Early Learning**
- **K-12 Instructional and Improvement Strategies** (includes Reading and Literacy, Comprehensive School Reform, Class-Size Reduction, Extended Learning Time, Education Technology)
- **Preparing Students for College and Careers** New Reports Available
- **School Choice** (includes Charter Schools and Magnet Schools, Voluntary Public School Choice, Title I School Choice and Supplemental Educational Services, Single-Sex Schools, Private Schools and Organizations)
- **Safe and Healthy Schools** New Reports Available
- **School Finance** New Reports Available
- **Student Populations** (includes New Reports Available American Indian and Alaska Native Students, English Learners New Reports Available, Children of Migratory Farmworkers, Students with Disabilities, Homeless Children and Youth  New Reports Available, Rural Schools,  Neglected and Delinquent Youth New Reports Available)

- **Outcomes and Institutional Practices** New Reports Available
- **Student Aid**
- **Student Support Grant Evaluations**
- **Workforce and Occupational Education**
- **Higher Education Finance**

**Archived Reports**

---

**Civil Rights Data Collection State Files**
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         203,041
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               203,041
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 203,041
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,923
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       371,322
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,639,182
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   203,041
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   38,579
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (27,782)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (27,782)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
No. 8022.

#### The Lima Electric Light & Power Co. *v.*Antrim, Admr.

(Decided December 1, 1903.)

Error to Circuit Court of Allen county.

*Messrs. Richie & Richie*and *Mr. W. H. Leete,*for’ plaintiff in error.

*Messrs. Motter, Mackenzie & Weadock*and *Messrs.. GoeJce & Hoskins,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Burket, C. J., Spear, Davis, Shauck, Price andi Crew, JJ., concur.
#### 222.1003 Applicability.
#### 2042.570-1 Policy.

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission's (NRC) policy is to support the contractor's expression of professional health and safety-related concerns associated with the contractor's work for the NRC that may differ from a prevailing NRC staff view, disagree with an NRC decision or policy position, or take issue with proposed or established agency practices. An occasion may arise when an NRC contractor, contractor's personnel, or subcontractor personnel believes that a conscientious expression of a competent judgement is required to document these concerns on matters directly associated with its performance of the contract. The procedure described in 2052.242-71, Procedures for Resolving NRC Contractor Differing Professional Views, provides for the expression and resolution of DPVs of health and safety-related concerns associated with the mission of the agency by NRC contractors, contractor personnel, or subcontractor personnel on matters directly associated with its performance of the contract. The contractor shall provide a copy of the NRC DPV procedure to all of its employees performing under this contract and to all subcontractors who shall, in turn, provide a copy of the procedure to its employees. The prime contractor or subcontractor shall submit all DPV's received but need not endorse them.
----

****SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSIONWashington D.C.  20549

**FORM 10-QSB**

Quarterly Report Under Section 13 or 15 (d)Of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934****

For Quarter Ended:      June 30, 2004    
Commission File Number:          0-5662

 

**CARDIFF COMMUNICATIONS, INC.**

**                                         **(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
**Exhibit 23.1**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

The Board of Directors 

Team, Inc. and Subsidiaries: 

We consent to the incorporation by referencein the registration statements (No. 333-119341, No. 333-119344, No. 333-119346, No. 333-30003, No. 333-72329, No. 333-74060, No. 333-72331, No. 333-74070, No. 333-74062, No. 333-29997, No. 333-74068, No. 333-138011, and No. 333-151151) on Form S-8of Team, Inc. and Subsidiaries of our reports dated August 11, 2009, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Team, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of May 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensiveincome, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended May 31, 2009, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of May 31, 2009, which reports appear in the May 31, 2009annual report on Form 10-K of Team, Inc. and Subsidiaries. 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

Houston, Texas 

August 11, 2009
207.471 Funding requirements. ( a ) Fund leases in accordance with DoD Financial Management Regulation (FMR) 7000.14-R, Volume 2A, Chapter 1.
( b ) DoD leases are either capital leases or operating leases. See FMR 7000.14-R, Volume 4, Chapter 6, section 060206.
( c ) Use procurement funds for capital leases, as these are essentially installment purchases of property.
[64 FR 31732, June 14, 1999, as amended at 66 FR 55121, Nov. 1, 2001; 71 FR 53045, Sept. 8, 2006; 76 FR 76319, Dec. 7, 2011]
22.1603 Exceptions. ( a ) The requirements of this subpart do not apply to— ( 1 ) Contracts under the simplified acquisition threshold;
( 2 ) Subcontracts of $10,000 or less; and
( 3 ) Contracts or subcontracts for work performed exclusively outside the United States.
( b ) *Exemptions granted by the Secretary.* ( 1 ) If the Secretary finds that the requirements of the Executive Order impair the ability of the Government to procure goods and services on an economical and efficient basis or if special circumstances require an exemption in order to serve the national interest, the Secretary may exempt a contracting department or agency, or groups of departments or agencies, from the requirements of any or all of the provisions of this Executive Order with respect to a particular contract or subcontract, or any class of contracts or subcontracts, including the requirement to include the clause at 52.222-40, or parts of that clause, in contracts.
( 2 ) Requests for exemptions may be submitted in accordance with Department of Labor regulations at 29 CFR 471.3.
227.7105-2 Acquisition of existing works without modification. ( a ) Use the clause at 252.227-7021, Rights in Data—Existing Works, in lieu of the clause at 252.227-7013, Rights in Technical Data—Other Than Commercial Products and Commercial Services, in solicitations and contracts exclusively for existing works when— ( 1 ) The existing works will be acquired without modification; and
( 2 ) The Government requires the right to reproduce, prepare derivative works, or publicly perform or display the existing works; or
( 3 ) The Government has a specific need to obtain indemnity for liabilities that may arise out of the content, performance, use, or disclosure of such data.
( b ) The clause at 252.227-7021 provides the Government, and others acting on its behalf, a paid-up, non-exclusive, irrevocable, world-wide license to reproduce, prepare derivative works and publicly perform or display the works called for by a contract and to authorize others to do so for government purposes.
( c ) A contract clause is not required to acquire existing works such as books, magazines and periodicals, in any storage or retrieval medium, when the Government will not reproduce the books, magazines or periodicals, or prepare derivative works.
[60 FR 33471, June 28, 1995, as amended at 88 FR 6586, Jan. 31, 2023]
#### Clancy Moncelsi, Appellant, v. Richard C. Keller, Respondent.

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs to the respondent. No opinion. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, Valente, McNally, and Stevens, JJ.
M. P. No. 75-102.

#### Richard D. Worrell *et al. v.*Frank A. DelSesto *et al.*

*Edwards & Angelí, Deming E. Sherman,*for petitioners. *Milton Bernstein,*for respondents.

Petition for writ of certiorari denied.
#### 204.2100 Scope of subpart.

This subpart implements section 1656 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 (Pub. L. 115-91) and section 889(a)(1)(A) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 (Pub. L. 115-232).
1509.505-70 Information sources. ( a ) *Disclosure.* Prospective EPA Contractors responding to solicitations or submitting unsolicited proposals shall provide information to the Contracting Officer for use in identifying, evaluating, or resolving potential organizational conflicts of interest. The submittal may be a certification or a disclosure, pursuant to paragraph (a) (1) or (2) of this section. ( 1 ) If the prospective contractor is not aware of any information bearing on the existence of any organizational conflict of interest, it may so certify.
( 2 ) Prospective contractors not certifying in accordance with paragraph (a)(1) of this section must provide a disclosure statement which describes concisely all relevant facts concerning any past, present, or planned interests relating to the work to be performed and bearing on whether they, including their chief executives, directors, or any proposed consultant or subcontractor, may have a potential organizational conflict of interest.
( b ) *Failure to disclose information.* Any prospective contractor failing to provide full disclosure, certification, or other required information will not be eligible for award. Nondisclosure or misrepresentation of any relevant information may also result in disqualification from award, termination of the contract for default, or debarment from Government contracts, as well as other legal action or prosecution. In response to solicitations, EPA will consider any inadvertent failure to provide disclosure certification as a “minor informality” (as explained in FAR 14.405); however, the prospective contractor must correct the omission promptly.
( c ) *Exception.* Where the Contractor has previously submitted a conflict of interest certification or disclosure for a contract, only an update of such statement is required when the contract is modified.
[49 FR 8839, Mar. 8, 1994. Redesignated at 59 FR 18619, Apr. 19, 1994]
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Cagles, Inc. for the period ended January 3, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-Q), I, J. Douglas Cagle, Chief Executive Officer of Cagles, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:  1. The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, and  2. The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date: February 17, 2009  By: /s/ J. Douglas Cagle J. Douglas Cagle Chief Executive Officer          CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Cagles, Inc. for the period ended January 3, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-Q), I, Mark M. Ham IV, Chief Financial Officer of Cagles, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:  1. The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, and  2. The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date: February 17, 2009  By: /s/ Mark M. Ham IV Mark M. Ham IV Chief Financial Officer
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 172 (Thursday, September 5, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 54640]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-21588]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Extension of Public Comment Period Hydrogen Energy California's 
Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle Project Preliminary Staff 
Assessment and Draft Environmental Impact Statement; Correction

AGENCY: U.S. Department of Energy.

ACTION: Extension of public comment period; notice of public hearing; 
correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On Monday, August 26, 2013, the Department of Energy (DOE) 
published a Notice of Extension of Public Comment Period and Public 
Hearing for the Hydrogen Energy California's Integrated Gasification 
Combined Cycle Project Preliminary Staff Assessment and Draft 
Environmental Impact Statement. This document corrects several 
typographical errors.

Corrections

    In the Federal Register on Monday, August 26, 2013, in FR Doc. 
2013-20713, on page 52764, the following corrections are made:
    (1) In SUMMARY, sixth line, ``extening'' is corrected to read 
``extending.''
    (2) In DATES, third paragraph, first line, ``OE'' is corrected to 
read ``DOE.''
    (3) In FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT, twelfth line, ``DOE'' is 
corrected to read ``DOE's.''

    Dated: August 29, 2013.
Mark J. Matarrese,
Director, Office of Environment, Security, Safety & Health, Office of 
Fossil Energy.
[FR Doc. 2013-21588 Filed 9-4-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
```
217.7405 Plans and reports. ( a ) To provide for enhanced management and oversight of UCAs, departments and agencies shall— ( 1 ) Prepare and maintain a Consolidated UCA Management Plan; and
( 2 ) Prepare semi-annual Consolidated UCA Management Reports addressing each UCA with an estimated value exceeding $5 million.
( b ) Consolidated UCA Management Reports and Consolidated UCA Management Plan updates shall be submitted to the Office of the Principal Director, Defense Pricing, Contracting, and Acquisition Policy (Contract Policy) at *osd.pentagon.ousd-a-s.mbx.asda-dp-c-contractpolicy@mail.mil*, by October 31 and April 30 of each year in accordance with the procedures at PGI 217.7405.
( c ) Consolidated UCA Management Reports shall include information about all change orders that are not forward priced (*i.e.,* unpriced) and have an estimated value exceeding $5 million.
[74 FR 37650, July 29, 2009, as amended at 75 FR 48277, Aug. 10, 2010; 88 FR 73236, Oct. 25, 2023; 89 FR 60831, July 29, 2024]