alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Order Form (01/2005)

United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois

Name of Assigned Judge

or Magistrate Judge Samuel Der-Yeghiayan Sitting Judge if Otherthan Assigned Judge

CASE NUMBER 12 C 2711 DATE 6/28/2012

CASE

TITLE

Kevin Betts (N–74536) vs. Salvador A Godinez

DOCKET ENTRY TEXT

For the reasons stated below, Petitioner’s motion to reconsider [10] is denied. Petitioner has also filed pro se

motions seeking leave to file instanter additional exhibits [7] for his Petition [7], a supplemental Petition [11],

and an amended memorandum of law in support of his Petition [12]. Such motions [7], [11], and [12] to

supplement are granted. Petitioner having paid the filing fee, Respondent is given until 07/30/12 to answer,

move or otherwise plead to Petitioner’s petition for writ of habeas corpus. In the event the Respondent

answers Petitioner’s petition, Petitioner is given until 08/30/12 to file his reply in further support of his

petition. Should Respondent move to dismiss, Petitioner is given until 08/30/12 to file his response and

Respondent is given until 09/06/12 to file his reply in further support of his motion to dismiss. Status hearing

set for 11/08/12 at 9:00 a.m. 

O[ For further details see text below.] Docketing to mail notices.

STATEMENT

This matter is before the court on Petitioner Kevin Betts’ (Betts) pro se motion for reconsideration. 

On April 12, 2012, Betts filed the petition for writ of habeas corpus in this case pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254

(Petition). Betts indicates that his appeal on the denial of his second post-conviction petition is still pending 

and thus he still has not exhausted his state court remedies on all issues presented in the Petition. Betts

argues, however, that he has exhausted his state court remedies as to some of his claims, and he requests that

the court stay the instant action until he has exhausted all his state court remedies in accordance with Rhines

v. Weber, 544 U.S. 269 (2005). On April 12, 2012, Betts filed a motion to stay his Petition pending the

resolution of the unexhausted claims, and on May 8, 2012, this court denied the motion. Betts now requests

that the court reconsider that ruling. Betts has not presented any new arguments that could have been

presented earlier or shown that the court erred in denying his motion to stay the Petition. Betts has not shown

good cause for failing to exhaust certain claims and the claims that Betts seeks to exhaust during the

proposed stay are plainly meritless. Thus, a stay is not warranted, and the motion for reconsideration is

12C2711 Kevin Betts (N-74536) vs. Salvador A Godinez Page 1 of 2
STATEMENT

denied. See, e.g., Rhines, 544 U.S. at 277 (explaining the considerations for granting a stay). 

Betts has also filed pro se motions seeking leave to file instanter additional exhibits for his Petition, a

supplemental Petition, and an amended memorandum of law in support of his Petition. Such motions to

supplement are granted.

12C2711 Kevin Betts (N-74536) vs. Salvador A Godinez Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 21.1



SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT



The companies listed below are all of the subsidiaries of ACR Group, Inc. as of February 29, 2004. All of the companies are wholly-owned.



|                                     |  |                       
|------------------------------------ |  | ----------------------
|Name of Subsidiary                   |  | State of Incorporation
|ACR Supply, Inc.                     |  | Texas                 
|Total Supply, Inc.                   |  | Texas                 
|Valley Supply, Inc.                  |  | Texas                 
|Heating and Cooling Supply, Inc.     |  | Nevada                
|ETI Texas, Inc.                      |  | Tennessee             
|Florida Cooling Supply, Inc.         |  | Texas                 
|West Coast HVAC Supply, Inc.         |  | Texas                 
|Lifetime Filter, Inc.                |  | Texas                 
|Contractors Heating and Supply, Inc. |  | Texas                 
|CAC Distributors, Inc.               |  | Texas
E X H I B I T   9 9

                         OPINION OF FRIEDMAN & FRIEDMAN,
                   INDEPENDENT AUDITORS FOR ALPNET CANADA INC.

To the Shareholder of 
ALPNET Canada Inc.

We have audited the balance sheets of ALPNET Canada Inc. as at December 31, 1996
and 1995 and the statements of earnings, deficit and changes in financial
position for each of the years ended December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994.  These
financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management.  Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on
our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards.  Those standards require that we plan and perform an audit to obtain
reasonable assurance as to whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement.  An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements.  An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.

In our opinion, these financial statements present fairly, in all material
respects, the financial position of the Company as at December 31, 1996 and 1995
and the results of its operations and the changes in its financial position for
each of the years in the three year period ended December 31, 1996 in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles.

\s\FRIEDMAN & FRIEDMAN

Chartered Accountants

Montreal, Quebec
February 10, 1997
215.506 Postaward debriefing of offerors. ( b ) Notwithstanding FAR 15.506(b), when requested by a successful or unsuccessful offeror, a written or oral debriefing is required for contract awards valued at $10 million or more (section 818 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 (Pub. L. 115-91)).
( c ) [Reserved]
( d ) In addition to the requirements of FAR 15.506(d), the minimum debriefing information shall include the following: ( i ) For award of a contract in excess of $10 million and not in excess of $100 million with a small business or nontraditional defense contractor, an option for the small business or nontraditional defense contractor to request disclosure of the agency's written source selection decision document, redacted to protect the confidential and proprietary information of other offerors for the contract award.
( ii ) For award of a contract in excess of $100 million, disclosure of the agency's written source selection decision document, redacted to protect the confidential and proprietary information of other offerors for the contract award.
( e ) If the Government exercises the authority provided in 239.7305(d), the debriefing shall not reveal any information that is determined to be withheld from disclosure in accordance with 10 U.S.C. 3252 (see subpart 239.73).
[78 FR 69270, Nov. 18, 2013, as amended at 84 FR 4369, Feb. 15, 2019; 87 FR 15810, Mar. 18, 2022; 87 FR 76992, Dec. 16, 2022]
IN D IA N H O T S P R IN G R D

IN D IA N H O T S P R IN G R D

Rio

Gra

n

d

e

Oxbow Lake

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

ESTADOS UNIDOS MEXICANOS

Schroder

Arroyo

Cedar

Arroyo

Indian Hot

Springs

Neely

Canyon

OE S

Schroder

Arroyo

OE S

57

34

27'

62

4

30°

11

06

105°

4

000m

03

4

54

34

000

34 34

54

30"

30°

25'

59

08

4

34

30"

N

10

34

680 58

105°

34

10

55 52'

30°

61 4

04

N

4

34

04

34

34

34

280

E

14

30"

45' 4

13

34

4

63

07

22'

52' 53

105° 4

03

30"

55 4

FEET

34

08

000

50'

FEET

105°

09

14

34

000m

30" 4 E

22'

15

310

FEET

FEET

50'

47' 47'

25'

27'

30"

45'

30'

30° 30"

30"

30'

000

710

10 000

000m 4

4

000m

4

34

4 4

34

4

4 4

34

34

34

34

34

34

34

34

34

34

05

53

56 62

15

61

58 63

59

06

57

10

09

12

11

07

13

12

05

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

TEXAS

ADJOINING 7.5' QUADRANGLES

QUADRANGLE LOCATION

TX 30105-432

SCHRODER ARROYO OE S, TX-CHH

2010

Interstate Route State Route

ROAD CLASSIFICATION

Interstate Route US Route State Route

Ramp 4WD

US Route Local Road

SCHRODER ARROYO OE S QUADRANGLE

TEXAS-CHIHUAHUA

7.5-MINUTE SERIES

Zone 13R

Imagery.............................................NAIP, September 2008

Roads.....................................US Census Bureau TIGER data

with limited USGS updates, 2008

Names...............................................................GNIS, 2008

Hydrography.................National Hydrography Dataset, 1995

Contours............................National Elevation Dataset, 2008

North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83)

World Geodetic System of 1984 (WGS84). Projection and

1 000-meter grid: Universal Transverse Mercator,

Produced by the United States Geological Survey

10 000-foot ticks: Texas Coordinate System of 1983

(central zone)

1000 500 0 METERS 1000 2000

1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000

FEET

This map was produced to conform with version 0.5.10 of the

draft USGS Standards for 7.5-Minute Quadrangle Maps.

A metadata file associated with this product is also draft version 0.5.10

SCALE 1:24 000

1 0.5 0 1

MILES

MN

1 0.5 0 KILOMETERS 1 2

GN

UTM GRID AND 2010 MAGNETIC NORTH DECLINATION AT CENTER OF SHEET

0° 13 ́

4 MILS

8° 27 ́

150 MILS

U.S. National Grid

100,000-m Square ID

Grid Zone Designation

13R

DQ

CONTOUR INTERVAL 20 FEET
# All

# AK

# AL

# AR

# AS

# AZ

# CA

# CO

# CT

# DC

# DE

# FL

# FM

# GA

# GU

# HI

# IA

# ID

# IL

# IN

# KS

# KY

# LA

# MA

# MD

# ME

# MH

# MI

# MN

# MO

# MP

# MS

# MT

# NC

# ND

# NE

# NH

# NJ

# NM

# NV

# NY

# OH

# OK

# OR

# PA

# PR

# PW

# RI

# SC

# SD

# TN

# TX

# UT

# VA

# VI

# VT

# WA

# WI

# WV

# WY
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 5.0.3

Eastern Division

Tracie Salgado, et al.

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:12−cv−03704

Honorable Harry D. Leinenweber

P.O. John Doe1−2

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Thursday, July 26, 2012:

 MINUTE entry before Honorable Harry D. Leinenweber:Stephanie Iglesias and

Jimmy Congenie's Rule 24 Motion to Intervene[7] is granted. Status hearing set for

8/16/2012 at 09:00 AM.Mailed notice(wp, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:12-cv-03704 Document #: 9 Filed: 07/26/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:21
#### Mastro Plastics Corp., Respondent, v. Emenee Industries, Inc., Appellant.

Order, entered on February 20, 1963, denying defendant’s motion to dismiss the second amended complaint for insufficiency, unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondent. The second amended complaint alleges a violation of section 43-a of the Lanham Act and seeks remedies, thereunder. It is alleged that the defendant is engaged in interstate commerce; that defendant’s merchandise is inferior to the sample obtained from the competitor plaintiff; that defendant employed, in connection with such merchandise, “ false description or representation * * * tending falsely to describe or represent the same ” in that it represented it would make shipment as per sample; and that plaintiff has been damaged as a result thereof. These allegations suffice to make out a cause of action under the Lanham Act (cf. *L’Aiglon Apparel*v. *Lema Lobell, Inc.,*214 F. 2d 649; *Parkway Baking Co.*v. *Freihofer Baking Co.,*255 F. 2d 641, 648-649). The act defines a new civil wrong and the prior dismissal of the original complaint because the common law afforded no remedy to a competitor where the wrong merely resulted in a diversion of customers without confusion or palming off *(Mastro Plastics Corp.*v. *Emenee Ind.,*16 A D 2d 420, affd. 12 N Y 2d 826) is of no significance. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, McNally and Stevens, JJ.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 5.0.3

Eastern Division

George Lagen

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:12−cv−04056

Honorable Blanche M. Manning

United Continental Holdings, Inc., et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Friday, June 29, 2012:

 MINUTE entry before Honorable Blanche M. Manning: Status hearing set for

7/26/2012 at 11:00 AM. Plaintiffs counsel should be prepared to advise the court

regarding the progress of efforts to serve the defendants. Plaintiff is directed to advise the

defendants of the status hearing forthwith. The parties are directed to discuss settlement,

whether they consent to proceed before the Magistrate Judge, and a proposed discovery

plan prior to the status.Mailed notice (jdh)

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:12-cv-04056 Document #: 5 Filed: 06/29/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:30
### Essential elements and soil amendments for plants; sources and use for agriculture

By: R. C. SeversonHansford T. Shacklette

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/cir1017

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
U.S. Dept Commerce/NOAA/NMFS/NWFSC/PublicationsNOAA Tech Memo NMFS NWFSC-8: Contaminant Exposure in Juvenile Salmon (cont): Figure 13
Table of Contents
Exhibit
      22.1




PHOTOMEDEX,
      INC.


a
      Delaware corporation





LIST
      OF
      SUBSIDIARIES








Surgical
      Laser Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation. *





Surgical
      Innovations & Services, Inc., a Delaware corporation*





SLT
      Technology, Inc., a Delaware corporation





ProCyte
      Corporation, a Washington corporation





Next
      Derm, Inc. **





SLT
      Properties, Inc., a Delaware corporation**





SLT
      Rentals, Inc., a Delaware corporation**





Diversified
      Properties and Equity Group, Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation**





Laser
      Analytics, Inc., a Massachusetts corporation**





Laser
      Photonics, Inc., a Delaware corporation**








*
      Merged
      into PhotoMedex, Inc. on November 18, 2004.




**
      Inactive.




E-22.1
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
 Notice is hereby given that the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC or Receiver) as Receiver for the institution listed below intends to terminate its receivership for said institution. Notice of Intent To Terminate Receivership
Fund
Receivership name
City
State
Date of
                             appointment 
                             of receiver10148
Century Bank, FSB
Sarasota
FL
11/13/2009
 The liquidation of the assets for the receivership has been completed. To the extent permitted by available funds and in accordance with law, the Receiver will be making a final dividend payment to proven creditors. Based upon the foregoing, the Receiver has determined that the continued existence of the receivership will serve no useful purpose. Consequently, notice is given that the receivership shall be terminated, to be effective no sooner than thirty days after the date of this notice. If any person wishes to comment concerning the termination of the receivership, such comment must be made in writing, identify the receivership to which the comment pertains, and sent within thirty days of the date of this notice to: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Division of Resolutions and Receiverships, Attention: Receivership Oversight Department 34.6, 1601 Bryan Street, Dallas, TX 75201. No comments concerning the termination of this receivership will be considered which are not sent within this time frame. (Authority: 12 U.S.C. 1819) Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. 
 
 Dated at Washington, DC, on January 19, 2021. James P. Sheesley, Assistant Executive Secretary.


[FR Doc. 2021-01543 Filed 1-22-21; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6714-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 91935
<PP&E>                                        18220670
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                18347605
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         14249734
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    1100000
<COMMON>                                      61581687
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  18347605
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   797538
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               85812
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (797538)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (797538)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (797538)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.01)


</TABLE>
III 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 35 

Authorizing the use of Emancipation Hall in the Capitol Visitor Center 

for a ceremony to present the Congressional Gold Medal collectively 

to the members of the Office of Strategic Services. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 27, 2018 

Mr. WARNER (for himself and Mr. BLUNT) submitted the following concurrent 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Authorizing the use of Emancipation Hall in the Capitol 

Visitor Center for a ceremony to present the Congressional Gold Medal collectively to the members of the 

Office of Strategic Services. 

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives 

2 concurring), 

3 SECTION 1. USE OF EMANCIPATION HALL FOR CEREMONY 

4 TO PRESENT THE CONGRESSIONAL GOLD 

5 MEDAL TO THE OFFICE OF STRATEGIC SERV6 ICES. 

7 (a) AUTHORIZATION.—Emancipation Hall in the 

8 Capitol Visitor Center is authorized to be used on March 


dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•SCON 35 ATS 

1 21, 2018, for a ceremony to present the Congressional 

2 Gold Medal collectively to the members of the Office of 

3 Strategic Services (OSS), in recognition of their superior 

4 service and major contributions during World War II. 

5 (b) PREPARATIONS.—Physical preparations for the 

6 conduct of the ceremony described in subsection (a) shall 

7 be carried out in accordance with such conditions as may 

8 be prescribed by the Architect of the Capitol. 

Æ 


dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
#### Michaline Trepeta v. Robert Trepeta.

Motion to dispense with printing granted insofar as to permit the appeal to be heard upon a typewritten or mimeographed record, without printing the same, and upon typewritten or mimeographed appellant’s points, upon condition that the appellant serves one copy of the typewritten or mimeographed record and appellant’s points on the Corporation Counsel of the City of New York and files 6 typewritten copies or 19 mimeographed copies of both the record on appeal and appellant’s points with this court. Concur — Valente, J. P., McNally, Stevens, Eager and Steuer, JJ.