alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                      34,353,000
<SECURITIES>                                18,033,000
<RECEIVABLES>                              134,161,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 6,930,000
<INVENTORY>                                 89,785,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           310,142,000
<PP&E>                                     289,295,000
<DEPRECIATION>                             133,306,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             703,253,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      174,707,000
<BONDS>                                     55,656,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    47,205,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 305,256,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               703,253,000
<SALES>                                    492,441,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           498,080,000
<CGS>                                      183,025,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              455,071,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,113,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             43,009,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                17,634,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         25,375,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                25,375,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .55
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
1830.7002-4 Determining imputed cost of money. ( a ) Determine the imputed cost of money for an asset under construction, fabrication, or development by applying a cost of money rate (see 1830.7002-2) to the representative investment (see 1830.7002-3). ( 1 ) When a representative investment is determined for a cost accounting period in accordance with 1830.7002-3(b)(1) or 1830.7002-3(c)(1), the cost of money rate shall be the time-weighted average rate.
( 2 ) When a monthly representative investment is used in accordance with 1830.7002-3(b)(2) or 1830.7002-3(c)(2), the cost of money rate shall be that in effect each month. Under this method, the FCCOM is determined monthly, and the total for the cost accounting period is the sum of the monthly calculations.
( b ) The imputed cost of money will be capitalized only once in any cost accounting period, either at the end of the accounting period or the end of the construction, fabrication, or development period, whichever comes first.
( c ) When the construction, fabrication, or development of an asset takes more than one accounting period, the cost of money capitalized for the first accounting period will be included in determining the representative investment for any future cost accounting periods.
§ 776.55 Responsibilities regarding non-attorney assistants. ( a ) With respect to a non-attorney acting under the authority, supervision, or direction of a covered attorney: ( 1 ) The senior supervisory attorney in an office shall make reasonable efforts to ensure that the person's conduct is compatible with the professional obligations of a covered attorney;
( 2 ) A covered attorney having direct supervisory authority over the non-attorney shall make reasonable efforts to ensure that the person's conduct is compatible with the professional obligations of a covered attorney; and
( 3 ) A covered attorney shall be responsible for conduct of such a person that would be a violation of this part if engaged in by a covered attorney if: ( i ) The covered attorney orders or, with the knowledge of the specific conduct, explicitly or impliedly ratifies the conduct involved; or
( ii ) The covered attorney has direct supervisory authority over the person, and knows of the conduct at a time when its consequences can be avoided or mitigated but fails to take reasonable remedial action.
( b ) [Reserved]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE PETER KOSTYSHYN, Defendant, Appellant,

v. STATE OF DELAWARE, Plaintiff, Appellee. § § No. 115, 2019 § § Court Below—Superior Court § of the State of Delaware § § Cr. ID No. 0908020496 (N) § § § § Submitted: March 28, 2019 Decided: April 2, 2019

ORDER On March 12, 2019, the a ppellant, Peter Kostyshyn, filed a notice of appeal from the Superior Court’s rulings, on Fe bruary 21, 2019, that Kostyshyn was competent to address allegations that he violated his probation, granting counsel’s motion to withdraw and stating that the Offense of Defense Services would be contacted about appointment of new c ounsel, denying Kostyshyn’s motion for recusal, denying Kostyshyn’s motion to m odify bail without prejudice, and denying Kostyshyn’s other motions. On March 12, 2019, the Senior Court Clerk issued a notice directing Kostyshyn to show why th is appeal should not be dismissed based on: (i) this Court’s lack of jurisdiction to hear a criminal inte rlocutory appeal; and (ii) his failure to comply with this Court’s July 16, 2013 or der requiring him to include the filing fee or a prope rly completed motion to proceed in forma pauperis2 with pro se filings relating to his criminal cases. Kostyshyn failed to respond to the notice to show cause within the require d the ten-day period, making dismissal deemed to be unopposed. This is the second interlocutory app eal and third proceeding Kostyshyn has instituted in this Court relating to his alleged violati on of probation in 2018. 1 If Kostyshyn files any additional interlocutory a ppeals or writs in this Court relating to this alleged violation of probation, the Clerk is directed not to docket such filings

absent leave of the Court. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, unde r Supreme Court Rules 3(b)(2) and 29(c), that this appeal is DISMISSED.

BY THE COURT: /s/ Collins J. Seitz, Jr. Justice

1 Kostyshyn v. State , 2019 WL 327961, at *1 (Del. Jan. 23, 2019) (dismissing interlocutory appeal regarding Kostyshyn’s competency for a co ntested violation of probation hearing); In re Kostyshyn , No. 116, 2019 (petition for a writ of mandamus).
#### 223.370-4 Procedures.

Follow the procedures at PGI 223.370-4.

[70 FR 73151, Dec. 9, 2005]
U.S. Dept Commerce/NOAA/NMFS/NWFSC/PublicationsNOAA Tech Memo NMFS NWFSC-8: Contaminant Exposure in Juvenile Salmon (cont): Figure 4 
Table of Contents
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 12 (Thursday, January 21, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 6374]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-01378]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NEIGHBORHOOD REINVESTMENT CORPORATION


Sunshine Act Meetings; Special Board of Directors Meeting

TIME & DATE: 1:00 p.m., Friday, January 29, 2021.

PLACE: Via Conference Call.

STATUS: Open (with the exception of Executive Session).

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 
    The General Counsel of the Corporation has certified that in his 
opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth in 5 U.S.C. 552 (b)(2) 
and (4) permit closure of the following portion(s) of this meeting:

<bullet> Executive Session

Agenda

I. CALL TO ORDER
II. Executive Session: NeighborWorks Compass Update
III. Action Item FY2021 Appropriation--Only Budget
IV. Action Item Authority for Monthly Health Insurance Invoices 2021
V. Adjournment

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:  Lakeyia Thompson, Special 
Assistant, (202) 524-9940; <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#2468504c4b4954574b4a644a530a4b5643"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="cd81b9a5a2a0bdbea2a38da3bae3a2bfaa">[email protected]</span></a>.

Lakeyia Thompson,
Special Assistant.
[FR Doc. 2021-01378 Filed 1-15-21; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 7570-02-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
IIA 

Calendar No. 630 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. J. RES. 64 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United 

States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of the Treasury 

relating to ‘‘Returns by Exempt Organizations and Returns by Certain 

Non-Exempt Organizations’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 24, 2018 

Mr. TESTER (for himself, Mr. WYDEN, Mrs. MCCASKILL, Mr. WHITEHOUSE, 

Mr. MARKEY, Mrs. GILLIBRAND, Mr. UDALL, Mr. VAN HOLLEN, Mr. 

DURBIN, Mr. REED, Mr. BLUMENTHAL, Mrs. SHAHEEN, Ms. KLOBUCHAR, Mr. LEAHY, Mr. HEINRICH, Ms. BALDWIN, Ms. SMITH, Mr. 

CARDIN, Mr. KING, Mr. BENNET, Mr. DONNELLY, Mr. CASEY, Mr. 

SANDERS, Ms. STABENOW, Ms. HASSAN, Mr. JONES, Ms. HEITKAMP, 

Mr. PETERS, Mr. MENENDEZ, Ms. HIRONO, Ms. CORTEZ MASTO, Mr. 

BOOKER, Mr. KAINE, Mr. MURPHY, and Mr. MERKLEY) introduced the 

following joint resolution; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

OCTOBER 11, 2018 

Committee discharged, by petition, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 802(c), and placed 

on the calendar 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of 

title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by 

the Department of the Treasury relating to ‘‘Returns 

by Exempt Organizations and Returns by Certain NonExempt Organizations’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

SJ 64 PCS 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the De4 partment of the Treasury relating to ‘‘Returns by Exempt 

5 Organizations and Returns by Certain Non-Exempt Orga6 nizations’’ (Rev. Proc. 2018–38 (July 16, 2018)), received 

7 in the House of Representatives on July 26, 2018, and 

8 received in the Senate on July 30, 2018, and such rule 

9 shall have no force or effect. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS

pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 630 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. J. RES. 64 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapReturns by Certain Non-Exempt Organizations’’. lating to ‘‘Returns by Exempt Organizations and submitted by the Department of the Treasury re- ter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule 

OCTOBER 11, 2018 

Committee discharged, by petition, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 

802(c), and placed on the calendar 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
#### In the Matter of Robert C. Donnelly, Petitioner, v. Michael J. Murphy, as Police Commissioner of the Police Department of the City of New York, Respondent.

Determination of the respondent dated February 1, 1961 unanimously annulled, on the law and on the facts. Petitioner has been found guilty on two charges constituting violations of the Rules and Procedures of the Police Department of the City of New York, to wit: *“1.*.Said Ptl. Donnelly, performing tour from 11:00 p.m., March 6, 1960 to 7:00 A.M., March 7, 1960, assigned as operator R. M. P. car *#1727,*Sector *#1,*G. C. P. Pet., was absent from said sector without permission or proper police necessity about 5:50 a.m. (R & P 3/57.2). 2. Said Ptl. Donnelly, assigned as stated in specification *#1,*did fail and neglect upon return, to notify the desk officer or switchboard operator. (R *&*P 3/51.1 [b]) ” The punishment imposed was a fine of 30 days’ pay and probation for one year. Petitioner and Patrolman Lehr were assigned to a tour of patrol ear duty from 11:00 p.m. on March 6, 1960 to 7:00 a.m. on March 7, 1960 on Grand Central Parkway, Sector 1. At 5:50 a.m. on March 7, 1960 they investigated a report of the need for assistance by a woman and two children in an automobile which allegedly had left the road at 188th Street and Grand Central Parkway within their sector. On arrival at the reported site the automobile appeared to have departed. Shortly thereafter, about 6:00 a.m., petitioner became nauseous and vomited and proceeded with his partner in the patrol ear to the rear parking lot of the nearby stable area of Troop “ F ” of Mounted Squadron No. 2 of the New York City Police Department in order to use the toilet. He remained in the toilet until 6:55 a.m. and on his return to the patrol car found his partner Patrolman Lehr unconscious therein. Patrolman Lehr was pronounced dead at 7:50 a.m. A post-mortem examination disclosed the cause of his death to be the effects of carbon monoxide poisoning. Petitioner was administered oxygen in the police station and was admitted within an hour to Queens General Hospital where his examination disclosed that he was suffering from the effects of carbon monoxide inhalation. He remained at the hospital for five days. Unknown to petitioner and his partner a hole in the rear of the wheelhouse at the floor (spare tire well), which could not be seen during an inspection without removing the spare tire, permitted exhaust fumes to enter the trunk of the patrol ear. As a result the automobile retained a quantity of carbon monoxide fumes after 15 minutes of motor operation. The record lacks substantial evidence to sustain the charges. Concur — Breitel, J. P., McNally, Stevens, Eager and Steuer, JJ.
#### McCORMICK v. SHEA et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.

January 17, 1906.)

Judgment—Opening Default—Costs.

Where defendant should have had a reasonable adjournment, his motion to open default should be granted without terms.

[Ed. Note.—For cases in point, see vol. 30, Cent. Dig. Jtidgment, § 326.]

Appeal from City Court of New York, Trial Term.

Action by John McCormick against' Annie A. Shea, impleaded with another. From an order opening the default of said defendant on payment of costs, she appeals.

Modified.

See 94 N. Y. Supp. 485.

Argued before SCOTT, P. J., and BLANCHARD and DOW-LING, JJ.

Franklin Bien, for appellant.

David Bernstein, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Under the circumstances the defendant should have had a reasonable adjournment, and the "motion to open the default should have been granted without the imposition of terms.

The order appealed from will be modified by striking out so much thereof as imposed costs upon defendant, and as so modified will be affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements to appellant.
Exhibit 32.1

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.  SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

          In connection with the Amendment to Annual Report of SORL AUTO PARTS, INC. (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the “report”), I, Xiao Ping Zhang, Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1)          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2)          The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

| Dated this 31st day of   January, 2006 | /s/ Xiao Ping Zhang     |
|----------------------------------------|-------------------------|
|                                   |                         |
|                                   | Xiao Ping Zhang         |
|                                   | Chief Executive Officer |
<TABLE> <S> <C>
                              
<ARTICLE>                          5
<LEGEND>                        
        This schedule contains summary financial  information extracted from the
     Partnership's  audited  financial  statements  for the twelve  months ended
     December  31, 1996 and is  qualified  in its  entirety by reference to such
     financial statements.
</LEGEND>                       
<MULTIPLIER>                            1,000
                                    
<S>                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                       DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                    323
<SECURITIES>                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                               0
<ALLOWANCES>                                0
<INVENTORY>                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          323
<PP&E>                                     92
<DEPRECIATION>                              0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            415
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     153
<BONDS>                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<COMMON>                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                                262
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              415
<SALES>                                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          255
<CGS>                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             280
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          (25)
<INCOME-TAX>                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      (25)
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                             (25)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                          (2.82)
<EPS-DILUTED>                          (2.82)
        

</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, 

AS TRUSTEE UNDER THE POOLING 

AND SERVICING AGREEMENT, 

DATED AS OF JANUARY 1, 2004, 2004-

CB1 TRUST, C-BASS MORTGAGE 

LOAN ASSET-BACKED 

CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2004-CB1

 Plaintiff,

v.

BRIAN ANDERSON, CITY OF 

CHICAGO, MUNICIPAL 

CORPORATION

 Defendants.

Case No: 1:12-cv-3165

Judge: John F. Grady

MOTION FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT OF FORECLOSURE NUNC PRO TUNC

NOW COMES the Plaintiff, U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS 

TRUSTEE UNDER THE POOLING AND SERVICING AGREEMENT, DATED AS OF 

JANUARY 1, 2004, 2004-CB1 TRUST, C-BASS MORTGAGE LOAN ASSET-BACKED 

CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2004-CB1, by and through its attorney, Megan Christine Adams, 

and moves this Honorable Court for Entry of Judgment of Foreclosure Nunc Pro Tunc 

3/13/2013. In support thereof, Plaintiff states as follows:

1. On 4/27/2012 Plaintiff filed its Complaint to Foreclose Mortgage.

2. On 8/29/2012 Plaintiff filed its Motion for Summary Judgment requesting the Court enter 

a judgment of foreclosure in favor of Plaintiff.

3. On March 13, 2013 the Court granted summary judgment in favor of the Plaintiff,

requesting the Plaintiff submit a proposed judgment of foreclosure.

4. For reasons unknown to new counsel, a Judgment of Foreclosure was never entered.

5. Therefore, Plaintiff seeks a judgment of foreclosure nunc pro tunc March 13, 2013 so that 

Plaintiff may proceed with the sale of this foreclosed property.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully requests that a Judgment of Foreclosure be entered 

in this case, with a nunc pro tunc date of March 13, 2013, so that the Plaintiff can move forward 

with the sale of this foreclosed property.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Megan Christine Adams

Megan Christine Adams ARDC#6312221

Potestivo & Associates, P.C.

223 West Jackson Blvd, suite 610

Chicago, IL 60601

(312)263-0003
<PAGE>

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



We hereby consent to the use in the Statement of Additional Information
constituting part of this Registration Statement on Form N-4 (the "Registration
Statement") of (1) our report dated February 1, 2000 relating to the financial
statements of Separate Account Nos. 195, 197 and 198 of The Equitable Life
Assurance Society of the United States for the year ended December 31, 1999; (2)
our report dated February 1, 2000 relating to the consolidated financial
statements of The Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States for the
year ended December 31, 1999; and (3) our reports relating to the financial
statements of the following funds established under the Declaration of Trust of
the State Street Bank and Trust Company Investment Funds for Tax Exempt
Retirement Plans: Lifecycle Fund Group Trust - Conservative and Lifecycle Fund
Group Trust - Moderate (reports dated March 15, 2000), S&P Flagship Fund and S&P
500 Index Fund with Futures (Combined Financial Statements) (report dated
February 26, 2000), Russell 2000 Fund and Russell 2000 Non-Lending Fund
(Combined Financial Statements) (report dated February 29, 2000), Daily EAFE
Securities Lending Fund and Daily EAFE Non-Lending Fund (Combined Financial
Statements) (report dated February 29, 2000), Daily MSCI Europe Index Securities
Lending Fund and Daily MSCI Europe Index Fund (Combined Financial Statements)
(report dated February 24, 2000), Daily MSCI Japan Index Securities Lending Fund
and Daily MSCI Japan Index Fund (Combined Financial Statements) (report dated
February 24, 2000), Daily MSCI Pacific Basin ex-Japan Index Securities Lending
Fund and Daily MSCI Pacific Basin ex-Japan Index Fund (Combined Financial
Statements) (report dated February 24, 2000), Daily Government/Corporate Bond
Fund (report dated March 3, 2000) and Short Term Investment Fund (report dated
February 3, 2000), which reports appear in such Statement of Additional
Information, and to the incorporation by reference of our reports into the
Prospectus which constitutes part of this Registration Statement. We also
consent to the use in the Prospectus Supplement constituting part of this
Registration Statement of our report dated February 1, 2000 relating to the
financial statements of Separate Account No. 4 of The Equitable Life Assurance
Society of the United States for the year ended December 31, 1999, which report
appears in such Prospectus Supplement. We also consent to the references to us
under the headings "Condensed financial information" and "About our independent
accountants" in the Prospectus.


PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
New York, New York
April 24, 2000
Exhibit
      32(b)




CERTIFICATION
      FURNISHED PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
      2002


In connection with the Quarterly
      Report on Form 10-Q of Progress Energy, Inc.
      (the “Company”) for the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Peter
      M. Scott III, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
      Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


(1)           the Report fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of
      the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and


(2)           the information
      contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and result of operations of the Company.








/s/ Peter M. Scott
      III


Peter
      M.
      Scott III


Executive
      Vice President and


Chief
      Financial Officer


May 9,
      2006






This
      certification is being furnished and shall not be deemed filed by the Company
      for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
      or incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Exchange Act
      of
      1934, as amended, or the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.