alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1203.204 Treatment of violations. ( a ) The HCA is authorized to determine whether a Gratuities clause violation has occurred. If the HCA has been personally and substantially involved in the procurement, DOT legal counsel advice should be sought to determine if a substitute for the HCA should be designated.
( b ) The COCO shall ensure that the contractor is afforded the hearing procedures required by FAR 3.204(b). Government legal counsel should be consulted regarding the appropriateness of the hearing procedures.
( c ) If the HCA determines that the alleged gratuities violation occurred during the “conduct of an agency procurement”, the COCO shall consult with DOT legal counsel regarding the approach for appropriate processing of either the Procurement Integrity Act violation and/or the Gratuities violation.
4. N. Written Comments Received During the 45-Day 

 Comment Period.
[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Spinazze, ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2020-Ohio-4680.] 

DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. SPINAZZE. 

[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Spinazze, ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 

2020-Ohio-4680.] 

(No. 2019-1075—Submitted September 29, 2020—Decided October 1, 2020.) 

ON APPLICATION FOR REINSTATEMENT. 

____________________ 

{¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an 

application for reinstatement by respondent, Anthony Perin Spinazze, Attorney 

Registration No. 0071893, last known business address in Sylvania, Ohio. 

{¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of March 17, 2020, 

wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(12)(A)(3), suspended respondent from 

the practice of law for a period of six months, finds that respondent has substantially 

complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(24). 

{¶ 3} Therefore, it is ordered by this court that respondent is reinstated to 

the practice of law in the state of Ohio. 

{¶ 4} It is further ordered that the clerk of this court issue certified copies 

of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(D)(1) and that publication be 

made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(D)(2). 

{¶ 5} For earlier case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Spinazze, 159 Ohio St.3d 

187, 2020-Ohio-957, 149 N.E.3d 503. 

O’CONNOR, C.J., and KENNEDY, FRENCH, FISCHER, DEWINE, DONNELLY,

and STEWART, JJ., concur. 

________________________
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 931 Referred in House (RFH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                 S. 931

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 8, 2018

      Referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 4910 Brighton Boulevard in Denver, Colorado, as the ``George Sakato 
                             Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. GEORGE SAKATO POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 4910 Brighton Boulevard in Denver, Colorado, shall be known 
and designated as the ``George Sakato Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``George 
Sakato Post Office''.

            Passed the Senate March 7, 2018.

            Attest:

                                                JULIE E. ADAMS,

                                                             Secretary.
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice of Meeting.

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel's Taxpayer Assistance Center Improvements Project Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Tuesday, February 9, 2021.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Matthew O'Sullivan at 1-888-912-1227 or (510) 907-5274.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel's Taxpayer Assistance Center Improvements Project Committee will be held Tuesday, February 9, 2021, at 4:00 p.m. Eastern Time. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited time and structure of meeting, notification of intent to participate must be made with Matthew O'Sullivan. For more information please contact Matthew O'Sullivan at 1-888-912-1227 or (510) 907-5274, or write TAP Office, 1301 Clay Street, Oakland, CA 94612-5217 or contact us at the website:                     *http://www.improveirs.org.*                     The agenda will include various IRS issues.                

Dated: January 15, 2021.

Kevin Brown,

Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

[FR Doc. 2021-01373 Filed 1-21-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.3
 AXCESS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
WHISTLEBLOWER POLICY
 Purpose
  
    
    establishes guidance for the receipt, retention, and treatment of verbal or
written reports received by the Company regarding accounting, internal controls,
auditing matters, disclosure, fraud and unethical business practices, whether
submitted by Company employees or third parties (Allegation), and
    
    establishes guidance for providing Company employees a means to make Reports in a
confidential and anonymous manner, and
    
    makes clear the Companys intention to discipline, up to and including
termination of employment, any person determined to have engaged in retaliatory
behavior,
  Receipt
  Procedures
   i.
    
    Who is the alleged wrongdoer?ii.
    
    How serious is the alleged wrongdoing?iii.
    
    How credible is the allegation of wrongdoing?




---



##### 



Delegation of Authority With In the Audit Committee
  Interpretation
  Retaliation
  Audit Committee Review of Reports
  Reporting Allegations
  Dated and approved by the Board of Directors on this 22nd day of February 2005.
#### 209.270 Aviation and ship critical safety items.
FOURTH AMENDMENT TO MIRAGE RESORTS, INCORPORATED
               NON-QUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN

WHEREAS,   Mirage  Resorts,  Incorporated  maintains  a  Non-Qualified
Deferred  Compensation  Plan effective as  of  February  1,  1997,  as
amended  by  a  First Amendment thereto effective as of  February  20,
1997, a Second Amendment thereto effective as of February 1, 1998  and
a  Third  Amendment thereto effective as of February 15, 1999  (as  so
amended, the  "Deferred Compensation Plan"); and

WHEREAS, the Board of Directors desires to amend further the terms  of
the  Deferred Compensation  Plan in certain  respects as permitted  by
Section 8.4 of the Deferred Compensation Plan;

NOW, THEREFORE, it is declared as follows:

      1.        AMENDMENT TO SECTION 6.5.  Section 6.5 of the Deferred
Compensation  Plan is amended to add, following the word "appointment"
at the end of the last sentence thereof, the following:

          ",  or  (iii)  Mirage  Resorts, Incorporated  consummates  a
          merger with a wholly owned subsidiary of MGM Grand, Inc.,  a
          Delaware  corporation ("MGM"), pursuant to an agreement  and
          plan  of  merger  approved by the Board of Directors,  as  a
          result  of  which  Mirage  Resorts, Incorporated  becomes  a
          subsidiary of MGM."

      2.    OTHER  CAPITALIZED TERMS.  Except as  otherwise  expressly
provided,  all  capitalized terms used herein shall have  the  meaning
assigned to such terms in the Deferred Compensation Plan.

      3.    CONFIRMATION.  In all other respects,  the  terms  of  the
Deferred  Compensation Plan are hereby confirmed and shall  remain  in
full force and effect.

           IN  WITNESS  WHEREOF,  Mirage   Resorts,  Incorporated  has
caused  this  document to be executed by its duly  authorized  officer
effective as of March 4, 2000.

                              MIRAGE RESORTS, INCORPORATED

                              JAMES E. PETTIS
                              ----------------------------------------
                              By:  James E. Pettis
                              Title:  Vice President - Risk Management










                              EXHIBIT 10.1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

EASTERN DIVISION 

FIRST TIME VIDEOS LLC, ) CASE NO. 

 ) 

Plaintiff, ) Judge: 

 ) Magistrate: 

 v. ) 

 ) 

JOHN DOE, ) [Case pending in the U.S. District Court 

 ) for the Eastern District of Virginia, 

 ) Case No. 2:11-CV-00690]

Defendants. ) 

 

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL COMPLIANCE WITH SUBPOENA 

Plaintiff FIRST TIME VIDEOS LLC respectfully moves this Court, pursuant to Federal 

Rule of Civil Procedure 45(c)(2)(B), to enter an Order compelling COMCAST CABLE 

COMMUNICATIONS LLC (“Comcast”) to comply with a subpoena duces tecum issued on 

January 10, 2012, with respect to the above-referenced matter currently pending in the U.S. 

District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia. Plaintiff seeks to obtain identifying 

information associated with internet service account subscribers including name, current (and 

permanent) address, telephone number, e-mail address, and Media Access Control address 

pursuant to a subpoena duces tecum served on Comcast on January 12, 2012. 

Pursuant to Local Rule 37.2, after consultation by telephone and good faith attempts to 

resolve differences, the parties resolved one objection by Comcast. The undersigned counsel for 

First Time Videos LLC and John D. Seiver, counsel for Comcast held a telephone consultation 

on February 13, 2012 at or around 3:00 p.m. Good faith attempts by the parties were able to 

resolve one of the objections raised by Comcast, but the parties were unable to reach an accord 

on the remaining objections.

Case: 1:12-cv-01085 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/15/12 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:1
 WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully requests an order compelling Comcast to comply 

with the subpoena. 

 Respectfully submitted, 

FIRST TIME VIDEOS LLC 

DATED: February 15, 2012 

 

By: /s/ Paul Duffy 

 Paul Duffy (Bar No. 6210496) 

 Prenda Law Inc. 

 161 N. Clark St., Suite 3200 

 Chicago, IL 60601 

 Telephone: (312) 880-9160 

 Facsimile: (312) 893-5677 

 E-mail: paduffy@wefightpiracy.com 

 Attorney for Plaintiff 

 

 

Case: 1:12-cv-01085 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/15/12 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

 The undersigned hereby certifies that on February 15, 2012, copies of the foregoing 

document were served via First Class Mail, Postage Prepaid to: 

 John D. Seiver 

 Davis Wright Tremaine LLP 

 Suite 800 

 1919 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW 

 Washington, D.C. 20006-3401 

 Attorney for Comcast Cable Communications LLC 

 

 By: /s/ Paul Duffy 

 Paul Duffy 

Case: 1:12-cv-01085 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/15/12 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:3
#### In the Matter of the Accounting of Yetta S. Nudelman, as Executrix of Lotti Sauer, Deceased, Respondent. Morris Sauer, Appellant.

Motion by respondent to dismiss appeal denied, on condition that appellant perfect the appeal and be ready to argue or submit it at the March Term, beginning February 27, 1961. The appeal is ordered on the calendar for said term. The record and appellant’s brief must be served and filed on or before February 6, 1961. Beldock, Acting P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Pette, JJ., concur.
###### Editorial Note on Part 842

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 842 appear at 81 FR 83688, Nov. 22, 2016.

#### § 842.102 Attorney fees.

In the settlement of any claim pursuant to 32 U.S.C. 715 and this subpart, attorney fees will not exceed 20 percent of any award provided that when a claim involves payment of an award over $1,000,000, attorney fees on that part of the award exceeding $1,000,000 may be determined by the Secretary of the Air Force. For the purposes of this section, an award is deemed to be the cost to the United States at the time of purchase of a structured settlement, and not its future value.

[81 FR 83698, Nov. 22, 2016]
14.211 Release of acquisition information. ( a ) *Before solicitation.* Information concerning proposed acquisitions shall not be released outside the Government before solicitation except for presolicitation notices in accordance with 14.205 or 36.213-2, or long-range acquisition estimates in accordance with 5.404, or synopses in accordance with 5.201. Within the Government, such information shall be restricted to those having a legitimate interest. Releases of information shall be made ( 1 ) to all prospective bidders, and
( 2 ) as nearly as possible at the same time, so that one prospective bidder shall not be given unfair advantage over another. See 3.104 regarding requirements for proprietary and source selection information including access to and disclosure thereof.
( b ) *After solicitation.* Discussions with prospective bidders regarding a solicitation shall be conducted and technical or other information shall be transmitted only by the contracting officer or superiors having contractual authority or by others specifically authorized. Such personnel shall not furnish any information to a prospective bidder that alone or together with other information may afford an advantage over others. However, general information that would not be prejudicial to other prospective bidders may be furnished upon request; e.g., explanation of a particular contract clause or a particular condition of the schedule in the invitation for bids, and more specific information or clarifications may be furnished by amending the solicitation (see 14.208).
[48 FR 42171, Sept. 19, 1983, as amended at 50 FR 1738, Jan. 11, 1985; 50 FR 52429, Dec. 23, 1985; 55 FR 36795, Sept. 6, 1990; 62 FR 272, Jan. 2, 1997; 68 FR 43856, July 24, 2003]
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 164 (Wednesday, August 24, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 53025]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-21658]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Agency Information Collection Activities: Requests for Comments; 
Clearance of Renewed Approval of Information Collection: FAA Airport 
Master Record

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, FAA 
invites public comments about our intention to request the Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB) approval to renew an information 
collection. The Airport Safety Data Program involves the collection and 
dissemination of civil aeronautics information.

DATES: Written comments should be submitted by October 24, 2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carla Scott on (202) 385-4293, or by 
e-mail at: Carla.Scott@faa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    OMB Control Number: 2120-0015.
    Title: FAA Airport Master Record.
    Form Numbers: FAA Forms 5010-1, 5010-2, 5010-3, 5010-5.
    Type of Review: Renewal of an information collection.
    Background: 49 U.S.C. 329(b) empowers and directs the Secretary of 
Transportation to collect and disseminate information on civil 
aeronautics. Aeronautical information is required to be collected by 
the FAA in order to carry out agency missions such as those related to 
aviation flying safety, flight planning, airport engineering and 
federal grants analysis, aeronautical chart and flight information 
publications, and the promotion of air commerce as required by statute.
    Respondents: Approximately 19,800 airport owners/managers and state 
inspectors.
    Frequency: Information is collected on occasion.
    Estimated Average Burden per Response: 1 hour.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden: 8,870 hours.
    ADDRESSES: Send comments to the FAA at the following address: Ms. 
Carla Scott, Room 336, Federal Aviation Administration, AES-300, 950 
L'Enfant Plaza, SW., Washington, DC 20024.
    Public Comments Invited: You are asked to comment on any aspect of 
this information collection, including (a) Whether the proposed 
collection of information is necessary for FAA's performance; (b) the 
accuracy of the estimated burden; (c) ways for FAA to enhance the 
quality, utility and clarity of the information collection; and (d) 
ways that the burden could be minimized without reducing the quality of 
the collected information. The agency will summarize and/or include 
your comments in the request for OMB's clearance of this information 
collection.

    Dated: August 18, 2011.
Carla Scott,
FAA Information Collection Clearance Officer, IT Enterprises Business 
Services Division, AES-200.
[FR Doc. 2011-21658 Filed 8-23-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
The Honorable Jean C. Hamilton, Chi ef Judge, United States District Court for 1 the Eastern District of Missouri. United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 97-2653

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Missouri. Joseph O. Ramsey, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: November 17, 1997 Filed: December 4, 1997

___________ Before WOLLMAN, MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, and MURPHY, Circui t Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Pursuant to a written plea agreement, Joseph Oti s Ramsey pleaded guilty to bank robbery, in vio lation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a). The distric t court imposed a sentence 1 of 30 months & imprisonment, three years & supervise d release, and restitution. This-2-

appeal fol lowed. Counsel has filed a brief under Anders v. Cal ifornia , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and Ramsey has no t filed a supplemental brief.
Inhis Anders brief, counsel argues that the distric t cour t erred in imposing restitution. We conclude tha t Ra mseyfailed to preserve his right to challenge th e impositio n of restitution on appeal because he failed to object at senten cing. In any event, we find no clear error. See United States v
. Kess ler , 48 F.3d 1064, 1066 (8th Cir. 1995) (reviewin g for plain error where defendant failed to preserv e chal lenge to imposition of restitution by not objectin g at sentencing). After conducting the record review required by Penso n v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), we find no n on-frivolous issues. The judgment is affirmed. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Hyman Post v. Charles Samuels.

Motion to amend order of this court granted to the extent of permitting the petitioner to take his infant son to his home on alternate weekends, commencing at 3:00 p.m. on Friday and ending at 7:00 p.m. on Sunday; the petitioner to call for and deliver the infant to respondent’s home. The order of this court entered on the 13th day of March, 1962, is modified accordingly. Concur—Breitel, J. P., Rabin, Valente, McNally and Eager, JJ.
**CERTIFICATION**

**Exhibit 32.1**

Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, amended, and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted), Kambiz Hooshmand, Chief Executive Officer of Applied Micro Circuits Corporation (the “Company”) herebycertifies that, to the best of his knowledge: 

(1) The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscalyear ended March 31, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company for the period covered by the Report. 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) or its staff upon request. 

This certification accompanies the Form 10-K to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, asamended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Annual Report), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing. 

Date: May 30, 2007
Exhibit
      32.2





**SECTION
      906 CERTIFICATION**








I,
      Dennis
      M. McGrath, Chief Financial Officer of PhotoMedex, Inc., a Delaware corporation
      (the "Company"), do hereby certify, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as created pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





(1)
      the
      accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended
      December 31, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
      amended; and





(2)
      the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




PHOTOMEDEX,
              INC.Date: March
              16, 2006
            By:
            /s/ Dennis
              M.
              McGrathDennis
              M. McGrathChief
              Financial Officer






A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002 (“Section 906”), or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or
      otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the
      electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been
      provided to PhotoMedex, Inc. and will be retained by PhotoMedex, Inc. and
      furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.






E-32.2