alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Page 20
EXHIBIT 31.1
CERTIFICATION
I, John P. Derham Cato, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of TheCato Corporation, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of The Cato Corporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared; b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect,the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role inthe registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.   Date: December 6, 2004     /s/ John P. Derham Cato  John P. Derham Cato  Chairman, President and  Chief Executive Officer
U.S. Dept Commerce/NOAA/NMFS/NWFSC/Publications

Table A-4.Concentrations, ng/g (ppb) wet weight, of chlorinated contaminants in stomach contents of juvenile chinook salmon sampled in 1990. - a,b,c,d,e 

Footnotes follow 

Table A-4. Continued.Concentrations, ng/g (ppb) wet weight, of chlorinated contaminants in stomach contents of juvenile chinook salmon sampled in 1990. - a,b,c,d,e 

Footnotes:

a The concentrations of the analytes and the percent recovery of the surrogate standard were calculated using tetrachloro-m-xylene as the internal standard.

b The "less than" symbol (<) indicates that the analyte was not detected in concentrations above the stated value. 

c Concentrations and initial identifications were determined using gas chromatography (GC) with electron capture detection (ECD).

d Concentrations less than 10 are rounded to one significant figure; concentrations greater than 10 are rounded to two significant figures.

e Percent recovery for the internal standard (surrogate) averaged 94%, CV = 11%, n = 18. Percent recovery of the surrogate includes quality control samples.

f Aldrin coelutes with an unknown compound. The concentration would not be higher than the stated value.

g A large unidentified peak appeared at 45.03 minutes on the GC/ECD chromatogram.

h A large unidentified peak appeared at 47.28 minutes on the GC/ECD chromatogram.

i These samples are duplicate analyses. The data for the duplicate samples are not identical which implies that the samples were not completely homogeneous.

j Standard reference material from the National Institute of Science and Technology.

k RSD is the relative standard deviation which is the standard deviation divided by the mean and expressed as a percent. 

Table of Contents
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM (A) THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996, AS
INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE INTO THE  COMPANY'S ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE
FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996, AND IS QUALIFIELD IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH (B) FORM 10K.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         218,841
<SECURITIES>                                    43,220
<RECEIVABLES>                                  157,014
<ALLOWANCES>                                     6,003
<INVENTORY>                                    213,229
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               642,823
<PP&E>                                         150,130
<DEPRECIATION>                                  68,553
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 729,377
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          179,168
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       378,033
<OTHER-SE>                                     163,916
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   729,377
<SALES>                                        639,928
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               639,928
<CGS>                                          371,636
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  371,636
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 437
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 98,384
<INCOME-TAX>                                    34,437
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             63,221
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    63,221<F1>
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>MINORITY INTEREST OF $726,000 IS DEDUCTED FROM AFTER-TAX INCOME IN ARRIVING AT
NET INCOME OF $63,221,000.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF CASCADE NATURAL GAS
CORPORATION INCLUDED IN THE QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED
JUNE 30, 2000, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      283,190
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                        635
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                          39,734
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                         6,769
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 330,328
<COMMON>                                        11,045
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                       97,380
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                             15,477
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 123,902
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               62
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           125,000
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                        0
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                  81,364
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  330,328
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      204,184
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                            10,040
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     168,720
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     168,720
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                         35,464
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                 420
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                  25,844
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         8,381
<NET-INCOME>                                    17,463
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                          3
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                   17,460
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                         7,953
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                            0
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                          32,040
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.58
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.58


</TABLE>
Disclaimer

### State Department of Education

Wyoming Department of Education122 West 25th StreetSuite E200Cheyenne, WY 82002Phone: (307) 777-7675Fax: (307) 777-6234Website: http://edu.wyoming.gov/

### State Higher Education Agency

Wyoming Community College Commission5th Floor, Suite B2300 Capitol Ave.Cheyenne, WY 82002Phone: (307) 777-7763Fax: (307) 777-6567Website: http://www.commission.wcc.edu/

### Special Education Agency

Special Programs UnitWyoming State Department of EducationHathaway Building, Second Floor2300 Capitol AvenueCheyenne, WY 82002-0050Phone: (307) 777-2870 Website: http://edu.wyoming.gov/in-the-classroom/special-programs/

### State Adult Education Agency

Adult Basic Education Office Wyoming Community College Commission 2300 Capital Ave, 5th Floor, Suite B Cheyenne, WY 82002 Phone: (307) 777-7885 Fax: (307) 777-6567 Website: http://communitycolleges.wy.edu/abe-2.aspx

Back to state map
115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. J. RES. 53 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Honoring the life of William ‘‘Billy’’ F. Graham, Jr. 

Whereas William ‘‘Billy’’ F. Graham, Jr., was born on November 7, 1918, in Charlotte, North Carolina; 

Whereas, in 1939, Reverend Graham was ordained by Peniel 

Baptist Church in Florida; 

Whereas Reverend Graham studied at Florida Bible Institute 

and graduated from Wheaton College in Wheaton, Illinois, in 1943; 

Whereas Reverend Graham married his wife of nearly 64 

years, Ruth McCue Bell, in 1943; 

Whereas Reverend Graham had 3 daughters, 2 sons, 19 

grandchildren, and numerous great-grandchildren; 

Whereas, in 1950, Reverend Graham founded the Billy Graham Evangelistic Association, which is based in Charlotte, North Carolina; 

Whereas Reverend Graham preached to nearly 215,000,000 

individuals in more than 185 countries and territories on 

6 continents; 

Whereas Reverend Graham provided spiritual counsel for 

every President since Harry Truman; 
2 

†SJ 53 ES 

Whereas Reverend Graham prayed with members of the 

Armed Forces in combat zones in South Korea and Vietnam; 

Whereas Reverend Graham spoke against the communist Soviet Union, saying, ‘‘Communism has decided against 

God, against Christ, against the Bible, and against all religion.’’; 

Whereas Reverend Graham— 

(1) fought for racial integration; 

(2) invited Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., to preach 

with him in New York City in 1957; and 

(3) bailed Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., out of jail 

when Dr. King was arrested for protesting segregation; 

Whereas, following the terrorist attacks on September 11, 

2001, Reverend Graham spoke words of hope and comfort to the people of the United States at the Washington 

National Cathedral; 

Whereas Reverend Graham authored 34 books, including the 

bestselling autobiography, ‘‘Just as I Am’’, which began 

by discussing his early days on a dairy farm in North 

Carolina and continued through his career as a preacher 

and evangelist; and 

Whereas Reverend Graham received numerous honors, including— 

(1) the North Carolina Award for Public Service; 

(2) the Presidential Medal of Freedom; 

(3) the Ronald Reagan Freedom Award; and 

(4) the Congressional Gold Medal: Now, therefore, 

be it 
3 

†SJ 53 ES 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That Congress— 

4 (1) extends its sympathies to the family of Wil5 liam ‘‘Billy’’ F. Graham, Jr.; and 

6 (2) honors— 

7 (A) the life and ministry of Reverend Gra8 ham; and 

9 (B) the contributions of Reverend Graham 

10 to— 

11 (i) the State of North Carolina; 

12 (ii) the United States of America; and 

13 (iii) the moral and religious lives of 

14 millions of individuals. 

Passed the Senate February 28, 2018. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 
115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. J. RES. 53 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Honoring the life of William ‘‘Billy’’ F. Graham, 

Jr.
#### 1915.106 Contract clauses.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST )

COMPANY, AS TRUSTEE UNDER THE )

POOLING AND SERVICING AGREEMENT )

DATED AS OF SEPTEMBER 1, 2003, )

MORGAN STANLEY ABS CAPITAL INC. )

TRUST 2003-NC8, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) Case No. 12 C 2607

)

ALITA A. ABELL, CAPITAL ONE BANK )

(USA), N.A., SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST )

TO CAPITAL ONE BANK, CRESANDRA )

WILLIAMS, )

)

Defendants. )

MEMORANDUM ORDER

This action, which is extraordinarily long in the tooth in terms of the mortgage 

foreclosure lawsuits that have become a significant component of this District Court's caseload, 

has somehow fallen between the cracks -- its pendency came to light again during this Court's 

recent case-by-case review of pending actions assigned to its calendar. Under the circumstances 

a brief review of the bidding may be appropriate.

One of the individual co-defendants, mortgagor Alita Abell ("Abell"), originally appeared 

through counsel. But after this Court had issued a brief July 22, 2012 memorandum order 

striking counsel's Answer and Affirmative Defenses, while granting leave to file a corrected 

version, nothing further was ever filed on Abell's behalf. So on September 4, 2012 the lawyer 

for plaintiff Deutsche Bank National Trust Company ("Deutsche Bank") filed a motion for 
summary judgment coupled with a motion for the appointment of a special commissioner.

Because efforts were then being made by the mortgagor to obtain a loan modification or 

perhaps to make other arrangements that would avoid foreclosure, the matter was continued from 

time to time until March 18, 2013, when Deutsche Bank's counsel withdrew its pending motions 

without prejudice to possible refiling. Further status hearings were then scheduled and held, but 

with no resolution of the matter having taken place during a several month period, Deutsche 

Bank refiled similar motions in mid-August 2013. Because Abell's counsel did not appear when 

that second summary judgment motion was noticed up for hearing, the matter was continued 

through three more status hearings until November 13, 2013, at which point this Court indicated 

that summary judgment would be forthcoming -- but at that point the case dropped off the radar 

screen.

With apologizes for the delay, this Court finds that Deutsche Bank's submissions have 

shown that there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and that movant Deutsche Bank is 

entitled to a judgment as a matter of law, so that the entry of summary judgment is in order (see 

Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(a)). Accordingly Deutsche Bank's counsel is directed to deliver to this Court's 

chambers, for signature by this Court, two up-to-date order forms, one appointing Judicial Sales 

Corporation as special commissioner and the other setting out a judgment of foreclosure. This 

Court will promptly issue those appropriate orders.

__________________________________________

Milton I. Shadur

Senior United States District Judge

Date: January 15, 2014
#### In the Matter of Arnold Carlson, Respondent, v. Emil M. Podeyn et al., Constituting the Board of Assessment of Nassau County, Appellants.

In a proceeding to adjudge in contempt the *members of*the Assessment Board of Nassau County, by reason of their failure to comply with a prior order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated July 22, 1959, made in a proceeding-under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act, directing them, by October 1, 1959, pursuant to section 603 of the County Government Law of Nassau County, to adopt such rules for the guidance of the county’s deputy assessors in the performance of their duties “ as will establish an equitable and scientific system of assessing property for taxation,” to publish such rules and to make them available to the county taxpayers, said board members appeal from an order of said court, dated March 17, 1960, granting the petition, adjudging them in contempt for violating said prior order, and giving them 45 days to purge themselves by adopting revised regulations, publishing them and making them available. Order reversed, on the law and the facts, with costs, and application to adjudge said board members in contempt denied, without costs. Findings of fact inconsistent herewith are reversed and new findings are made as indicated herein. As punishment for contempt may involve not only loss of property but loss of liberty as well, it is a reasonable requirement that the mandate *811alleged to be violated should be clearly expressed, and, when applied to the act complained of, it should appear with reasonable certainty that it had been violated *(Ketchum*v. *Edwards,*153 N. Y. 534, 539). Here, the mandate or order of July 22, 1959, alleged to have been violated, except insofar as it directed the board members to adopt rules and regulations, to publish them and to make them available to taxpayers, is too vague and indefinite to furnish the basis for a contempt proceeding (cf. *Adams*v. *Adams,*179 App. Div. 152). If it be assumed, however, that the direction to adopt such rules and regulations *“*as will establish an equitable and scientific system of assessing property for taxation” may be enforced in such a proceeding, it does not appear from the record submitted that the board members have not adopted such rules and have not published and made them available, as required by the provisions of the said order. Nolan, P. J., Christ and Pette, JJ., concur; Beldock and Kleinfeld, JJ., dissent and vote to affirm on the opinion of the Justice at Special Term *(Matter of Carlson*v. *Podeyn,*24 Misc 2d 317).
225.7004-7 Contract clauses. ( a ) Unless a waiver has been granted, use the clause at 252.225-7019, Restriction on Acquisition of Anchor and Mooring Chain, in solicitations and contracts, including solicitations and contracts using FAR part 12 procedures for the acquisition of commercial products and commercial services, that exceed the simplified acquisition threshold and that require welded shipboard anchor or mooring chain.
( b ) Use the clause at 252.225-7062, Restriction on Acquisition of Large Medium-Speed Diesel Engines, in solicitations and contracts, including solicitations and contracts using FAR part 12 procedures for the acquisition of commercial products and commercial services, that exceed the simplified acquisition threshold and that require large medium-speed diesel engines for new construction of auxiliary ships using funds available for National Defense Sealift Fund programs or Shipbuilding and Conversion, Navy unless— ( 1 ) An exception at 225.7004-3(d) applies; or
( 2 ) A waiver has been granted.
( c ) Unless a waiver has been granted, use the clause at 252.225-7063, Restriction on Acquisition of Components of T-AO 205 and T-ARC Class Vessels, in solicitations and contracts, including solicitations and contracts using FAR part 12 procedures for the acquisition of commercial products and commercial services, that exceed the simplified acquisition threshold and that require components of T-AO 205 and T-ARC class vessels.
( d ) Use the clause at 252.225-7064, Restriction on Acquisition of Certain Satellite Components, in solicitations and contracts, including solicitations and contracts using FAR part 12 procedures for the acquisition of commercial products and commercial services, that exceed the simplified acquisition threshold and that include the acquisition of star trackers unless— ( 1 ) An exception at 225.7004-3(e) applies; or
( 2 ) A waiver has been granted.
[89 FR 46814, May 30, 2024, as amended at 89 FR 48330, June 6, 2024]
1

The Honorable Theodore McMillian died January 18, 2006. This opinion is

being filed by the remaining judges of the panel pursuant to 8th Cir. Rule 47E.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 05-1048

___________

Crescenciano Pena, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* District of Minnesota.

Dr. David Eduardy; Warden, FMC *

Rochester, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellees. *

___________

Submitted: January 6, 2006

Filed: January 20, 2006

___________

Before BYE, McMILLIAN1

, and RILEY, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.
2

The Honorable Paul A. Magnuson, United States District Judge for the District

of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Susan

Richard Nelson, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota. 

3

Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S.

388 (1971). 

-2-

Federal inmate Crescenciano Pena appeals the district court’s2

 adverse grant of

summary judgment in his Bivens3

 action. We review de novo the grant of summary

judgment, drawing all inferences in favor of Pena. See Jolly v. Knudsen, 205 F.3d

1094, 1096 (8th Cir. 2000). Having done so, we agree with the district court that the

summary judgment record revealed no Eighth Amendment violation. See Pool v.

Sebastian County, Ark., 418 F.3d 934, 942 (8th Cir. 2005) (prisoner must show more

than even gross negligence, and mere disagreement with treatment decisions does not

rise to level of constitutional violation); Long v Nix, 86 F.3d 761, 765 (8th Cir. 1996)

(inmates do not have constitutional right to particular type of treatment; nothing in

Eighth Amendment prevents prison physicians from exercising independent medical

judgment).

We decline to consider whether the district court properly determined that

Warden Constance Reece was not properly served, because Pena has not challenged

that determination. See Primary Care Investors, Seven, Inc. v. PHP Healthcare Corp.,

986 F.2d 1208, 1212 (8th Cir. 1993). We also decline to consider Pena’s newly raised

claim that he suffered substantive due process violations. See Stone v. Harry, 364

F.3d 912, 914 (8th Cir. 2004) (claims not presented to district court may not be

advanced on appeal).

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________
#### Rebecca Engel, Appellant, v. Bernard Friedman et al, Respondents.

.Motion by respondents to dismiss appeal granted, with $10 costs, and appeal dismissed. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Kleinfeld, Christ and Pette, JJ., concur.