DISMISS and Opinion Filed October 28, 2019 

# S

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05-19-00354-CV THE ACCOUNTS RETRIEVABLE SYSTEM, INC. ASSIGNEE OF CHASE MANHATTAN BANK USA, N.A. SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO BANK ONE DELAWARE, N.A., Appellant V. WEI CHIN LIN AND BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Appellees On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-18-03587-B



### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Burns, Justice Whitehill, and Justice Nowell Opinion by Chief Justice Burns We REINSTATE this appeal. The Court questioned its jurisdiction over this appeal as it appeared the judgment was not final or otherwise subject to an in terlocutory appeal. At the Court’s request, appellant filed a letter brief addressing our concern. Generally, appellate courts have jurisdicti on only over appeals from final judgments. See Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp. , 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001). A final judgment is one that disposes of all parties and claims. See id

. After the trial court signed an order dissolv ing a writ of garnishment, both Wei Chin Lin and Bank of America filed motions in the trial cour t seeking attorney’s fees from appellant. By–2– order signed February 18, 2019, the trial court granted Wei Chin Lin’s motion and awarded attorney’s fees to counsel for Wei Chin Lin. It appears that Bank of America’s motion for attorney’s fees from appellant remains pending before the trial court. Although Bank of America and appellant filed an agreed motion for nonsuit, the clerk’s record does not contain an order of nonsuit. See Farmer v. Ben E. Keith Co. , 907 S.W.2d 495, 496 (Tex. 1995) (when party moves to nonsuit its claims, appellate timetab le runs from signing of judgment or order disposing of those claims or parties). In its letter brief, appellant asked the Court to abate this appeal “with instructions to the trial court to enter a final order.” By order da ted August 16, 2019, we abated this appeal and gave appellant thirty days to obtain an order on the agreed motion for nonsuit and to have a supplemental clerk’s record filed containing any such order. As of today’s da te, a supplemental clerk’s record has not been filed and the Court has had no further corr espondence from appellant. The record before this Court does not contain a final judgme nt. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 42.3(a).

190354F.P05 /Robert D. Burns, III/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE–3– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT

THE ACCOUNTS RETRIEVABLE SYSTEM, INC. ASSIGNEE OF CHASE MANHATTAN BANK USA, N.A. SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO BANK ONE DELAWARE, N.A., Appellant
No. 05-19-00354-CV V.
WEI CHIN LIN AND BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Appellees On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-18-03587-B. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Burns. Justices Whitehill and Nowell participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opi nion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED

. It is ORDERED that appellees WEI CHIN LIN AND BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. recover their costs of this appeal from appellant THE ACCOUNTS RETRIEVABLE SYSTEM, INC. ASSIGNEE OF CHASE MANHATTAN BANK USA, N.A. SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO BANK ONE DELAWARE, N.A.
Judgment entered October 28, 2019