alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Ernest B. Thomas, Respondent, v. Cooley Contracting Co. et al., Appellants, and City of Schenectady — Waste Collection, Respondent. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.

Gibson, P. J.

Although the board seems to have been correct in relieving respondent city from contribution during the periods when reduced earnings exceeded the wage rate at the time of the injury in the city’s employ (Workmen’s Compensation Law, § 15, subd. 6, par. [d]; *Matter of Crawley*v. *Failla,*6 NY 2d 57), that issue is not before us, not having been raised in the application for review by the board (Workmen’s Compensation Law, § 23; *Matter of Hedlund*v. *United Exposition Decorating Co.,*15 A D 2d 973, 975, mot. for lv. to app. den, 11 N Y 2d 646). In such application, appellants urged error only in the Referee’s finding of the $80.56 wage rate. That rate, if not, in fact, conceded, is not questioned in appellants’ brief, which advances no reason to impeach it. The additional purported appeal from a Referee’s decision must, of course, be dismissed. Decision affirmed, with one bill of costs to respondents filing briefs. Purported appeal by notice of appeal dated May 2, 1963 dismissed, without costs. Herlihy, Reynolds, Aulisi and Hamm, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                       4,535,557
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  176,179
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,170,472
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,916,893
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,705,664
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,387,716
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       132,679
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,141,649
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,705,664
<SALES>                                      1,114,929
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,208,835
<CGS>                                        1,257,438
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                9,265,402
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,999,921
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (9,915,685)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (4,382)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (9,920,067)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (9,920,067)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.89)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.89)


</TABLE>
1846.672-4 Correction instructions. When, because of errors of omissions, it is necessary to correct the MIRR after distribution, it shall be revised by correcting the original master and distributing the corrected form. The corrections shall be made as follows: ( a ) Circle the error and place the corrected information in the same block. If space is limited, enter the corrected information in Block 16, referencing the error page and block.
( b ) When corrections are made to Blocks 15 and 17, enter the words *“CORRECTIONS HAVE BEEN VERIFIED”* on page 1. The authorized Government representative shall date and sign immediately below the statement. This verification statement and signature are not required for other corrections.
( c ) MIRRs shall not be corrected for Block 19 and 20 entries.
( d ) Clearly mark pages of the MIRR requiring correction with the words *“CORRECTED COPY”,* avoiding obliteration of any other entries. Even though corrections are made on continuation sheets only, also mark page 1 *“CORRECTED COPY”.*
( e ) Page 1 and only those continuation pages marked *“CORRECTED COPY”* shall be distributed to the initial distribution. A complete MIRR with corrections shall be distributed to new addressee(s) created by error corrections.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.1

                  FIFTH AMENDMENT TO THE HARBINGER CORPORATION

                             1996 STOCK OPTION PLAN



         THIS FIFTH AMENDMENT TO THE HARBINGER CORPORATION 1996 STOCK OPTION
PLAN (the "Amendment") is made effective as of the 25th day of April, 2000 (the
"Effective Date"), by HARBINGER CORPORATION, a corporation organized and doing
business under the laws of the State of Georgia (the "Company"). All capitalized
terms in this Amendment have the meaning ascribed to such term as in the
Harbinger Corporation 1996 Stock Option Plan (the "Plan"), unless otherwise
stated herein.

                              W I T N E S S E T H:

         WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Company desires to amend the
Plan to increase the number of shares that may be granted under the Plan.

         NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and mutual promises
contained herein, the Plan is hereby amended as follows:

         SECTION 1.        Section 3.1 of the Plan is hereby amended by deleting
the first sentence of Section 3.1 of the Plan in its entirety and substituting
in lieu thereof the following:

                           "3.1     Shares Reserved for Issuance. Subject to any
                  antidilution adjustment pursuant to Section 3.2, the maximum
                  number of Shares that may be subject to Options granted
                  hereunder shall not exceed 9,737,500, plus the number of Prior
                  Plan Shares; provided, however, the maximum number of Shares
                  with respect to which Options may be granted to any individual
                  grantee in any calendar year shall be 1,000,000."

         SECTION 2.        Except as specifically amended by this Fifth
Amendment, the Plan shall remain in full force and effect as prior to this Fifth
Amendment.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this FIFTH AMENDMENT TO THE
HARBINGER CORPORATION 1996 STOCK OPTION PLAN to be executed on the Effective
Date.

                                            HARBINGER CORPORATION


                                            By:
                                               --------------------------------
                                               James M. Travers
                                               CEO

ATTEST:


By:
   -----------------------
   Loren B. Wimpfheimer
   SECRETARY
#### 1422.103-4 Approvals.

The CO shall obtain approval for the use of overtime from the CCO after consultation with the cognizant program office.
225.302-6 Contract clause. Use the clause at 252.225-7039, Defense Contractors Performing Private Security Functions Outside the United States, instead of FAR clause 52.225-26, Contractors Performing Private Security Functions Outside the United States, in solicitations and contracts, including solicitations and contracts using FAR part 12 procedures for the acquisition of commercial products and commercial services, when private security functions are to be performed outside the United States in— ( 1 ) Contingency operations;
( 2 ) Combat operations, as designated by the Secretary of Defense;
( 3 ) Other significant military operations (as defined in 32 CFR part 159), designated by the Secretary of Defense, and only upon agreement of the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of State;
( 4 ) Peace operations, consistent with Joint Publication 3-07.3; or
( 5 ) Other military operations or military exercises, when designated by the Combatant Commander.
[80 FR 4999, Jan. 29, 2015, as amended at 81 FR 42560, June 30, 2016; 88 FR 6583, Jan. 31, 2023]
----

****SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSIONWashington D.C.  20549

**FORM 10-QSB**

Quarterly Report Under Section 13 or 15 (d)Of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934****

For Quarter Ended:      December 31, 2002    Commission File Number:          0-5662
**     CARDIFF COMMUNICATIONS,INC**(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

	                                              	    NEVADA                                               87-0267292                               (State or other jurisdiction of                                 (IRS Employer                                 incorporation or organization)                                Identification No.)

4766 South Holladay Blvd. Holladay, UT 84117(Address of principal executive offices)

Registrant's telephone number including area code:			(801) 273.9300

Former Address, if changed since last report

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or such shorterperiod that the registrant was required to file such reports)

Yes X   No    

and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 765 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 765

To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide for penalties for the 
   sale of any Purple Heart awarded to a member of the Armed Forces.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 29, 2017

  Mr. Perdue introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide for penalties for the 
   sale of any Purple Heart awarded to a member of the Armed Forces.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Private Corrado Piccoli Purple Heart 
Preservation Act''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

    Congress finds the following:
            (1) The Purple Heart medal solemnly recognizes the great 
        and sometimes ultimate sacrifice of American servicemembers 
        like Private Corrado Piccoli.
            (2) The Purple Heart medal holds a place of honor as the 
        national symbol of this sacrifice and deserves special 
        protections.

SEC. 3. PENALTY FOR SALE OF PURPLE HEARTS AWARDED TO MEMBERS OF THE 
              ARMED FORCES.

    Subsection (a) of section 704 of title 18, United States Code, is 
amended to read as follows:
    ``(a) In General.--
            ``(1) Penalty.--Whoever knowingly purchases, attempts to 
        purchase, solicits for purchase, mails, ships, imports, 
        exports, produces blank certificates of receipt for, 
        manufactures, sells, attempts to sell, advertises for sale, 
        trades, barters, or exchanges for anything of value any 
        decoration or medal authorized by Congress for the armed forces 
        of the United States, or any of the service medals or badges 
        awarded to the members of such forces, or the ribbon, button, 
        or rosette of any such badge, decoration or medal, or any 
        colorable imitation thereof, except when authorized under 
        regulations made pursuant to law, shall be fined under this 
        title, imprisoned not more than 6 months, or both.
            ``(2) Limitation on regulations.--Regulations described in 
        paragraph (1) may not authorize the sale of any Purple Heart 
        awarded to a member of the armed forces or former member of the 
        armed forces by the Secretary of the military department 
        concerned, unless the sale is conducted by the member or former 
        member to whom the Purple Heart was awarded.''.
                                 <all>
```
Functional Statements > Office of Legislation and Congressional Affairs 

-  OLCA Introduction 
-  OLCA Immediate Office 

OLCA Delegations of Authority may be found at https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/or/delegations/olca.html
May 15, 1975.

M. P. No. 74-53.

#### Henry LaPlume *v.*James W. Mullen, *Warden.*

*John D. Lynch,*for petitioner. *Julius C. Michaelson,*Attorney General, *John A. Murphy,*Special Asst. Attorney General, for respondent.

Motion of the petitioner to strike the instant case from the May 1975 argument calendar is denied.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2
 CERTIFICATION
    OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF
    DOLE FOOD COMPANY, INC.



This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of
    the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. § 1350,
    and is filed with respect to the quarterly report on
    Form 10-Q
    (the
    Form 10-Q)
    for the quarter ended June 16, 2007 of Dole Food Company,
    Inc. (the Issuer). I, Joseph S. Tesoriero, Vice
    President and Chief Financial Officer of the Issuer, certify
    that to the best of my knowledge:



(i) the
    Form 10-Q
    fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
    Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
    (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and



(ii) the information contained in the
    Form 10-Q
    fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
    condition and results of operations of the Issuer.



/s/  Joseph
    S. Tesoriero



Joseph S. Tesoriero

Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



July 31, 2007
212.212 Computer software. ( 1 ) Departments and agencies shall identify and evaluate, at all stages of the acquisition process (including concept refinement, concept decision, and technology development), opportunities for the use of commercial computer software and other non-developmental software in accordance with Section 803 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Pub. L. 110-417).
( 2 ) See Subpart 208.74 when acquiring commercial software or software maintenance. *See* 227.7202 for policy on the acquisition of commercial computer software and commercial computer software documentation.
[74 FR 34270, July 15, 2009]
|  |  |                                               |
|--|--|-----------------------------------------------|
|  |  | More ResourcesHigh Priority Performance Goals |  |  |
|  |  |                                               |
|  |

ED's mission is to promote student achievement and preparation for global competitiveness by fostering educational excellence and ensuring equal access.  

Congress established the U.S. Department of Education (ED) on May 4, 1980, in the Department of Education Organization Act (Public Law 96-88 of October 1979).  Under this law, ED's mission is to:

- Strengthen the Federal commitment to assuring access to equal educational opportunity for every individual;
- Supplement and complement the efforts of states, the local school systems and other instrumentalities of the states, the private sector, public and private nonprofit educational research institutions, community-based organizations, parents, and students to improve the quality of education;
- Encourage the increased involvement of the public, parents, and students in Federal education programs;
- Promote improvements in the quality and usefulness of education through Federally supported research, evaluation, and sharing of information;
- Improve the coordination of Federal education programs;
- Improve the management of Federal education activities; and
- Increase the accountability of Federal education programs to the President, the Congress, and the public.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       4,265,513
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         300,000
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               898,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    300,000
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                         2,095,422
<LOANS>                                     30,618,334
<ALLOWANCE>                                    584,106
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              41,601,689
<DEPOSITS>                                  37,734,575
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            360,294
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    768,750
<COMMON>                                     2,808,201
<OTHER-SE>                                    (70,131)
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              41,601,689
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              2,462,896
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              117,225
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               248,157
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             2,828,278
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           1,498,089
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              64,762
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        1,265,427
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  694,203
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               (510)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              1,278,535
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (907,609)
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   (907,609)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (907,609)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.32)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.32)
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.37
<LOANS-NON>                                    328,355
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                20,698
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                328,355
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               462,846
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  594,140
<RECOVERIES>                                    21,197
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              584,106
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           584,106
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        398,644
        

</TABLE>
[ARTICLE] 5
[LEGEND]
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS IN THE COMPANY'S CURRENT REPORT ON FORM 10-Q AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
[/LEGEND]
<TABLE>
<S>                             <C>
[PERIOD-TYPE]                   3-MOS
[FISCAL-YEAR-END]                          JUN-30-2000
[PERIOD-END]                               MAR-31-2000
[CASH]                                            8574
[SECURITIES]                                       555
[RECEIVABLES]                                    48468
[ALLOWANCES]                                      2040
[INVENTORY]                                      37250
[CURRENT-ASSETS]                                101187
[PP&E]                                           15605
[DEPRECIATION]                                    8352
[TOTAL-ASSETS]                                  162787
[CURRENT-LIABILITIES]                            76452
[BONDS]                                              0
[PREFERRED-MANDATORY]                                0
[PREFERRED]                                          0
[COMMON]                                           185
[OTHER-SE]                                       69503
[TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY]                    162787
[SALES]                                          50711
[TOTAL-REVENUES]                                 50711
[CGS]                                            34545
[TOTAL-COSTS]                                    34545
[OTHER-EXPENSES]                                     0
[LOSS-PROVISION]                                     0
[INTEREST-EXPENSE]                                 397
[INCOME-PRETAX]                                 (3549)
[INCOME-TAX]                                    (5374)
[INCOME-CONTINUING]                               1825
[DISCONTINUED]                                       0
[EXTRAORDINARY]                                      0
[CHANGES]                                            0
[NET-INCOME]                                      1825
[EPS-BASIC]                                        .12
[EPS-DILUTED]                                      .12
</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Anselmo Bilbao, Appellant.

Judgment of conviction unanimously affirmed. No opinion. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, McNally, Stevens and Steuer, JJ.
#### ACKER, MERRALL & CONDIT v. STERN et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.

March 2, 1906.)

1. Highways—Negligence—Unhitched House.

It is negligence to leave a horse standing in a street unhitched and unattended.

[Ed. Note.—For cases in point, see vol. 25, Cent. Dig. Highways, § 468.]

2. Negligence—Contributory Negligence—Acts in Emergency.

One is not guilty of contributory negligence merely because when confronted with peril he does not adopt the best course to avoid danger.

[Ed. Note.—For cases in point, see vol. 37, Cent. Dig. Negligence, § 99.]

Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Tenth District.

Action by Acker, Merrall & Condit against Isaac Stern and others.From a judgment for defendants, plaintiff appeals.

Reversed. ■ . ' .

Argued before SCOTT, P. J., and GIEGERICH and GREEN-BAUM, JJ.

Rollins & Rollins (F. Angelo Gaynor, of counsel), for appellant. Edgar H. Rosenstoclc, for respondents.

SCOTT, P. J.

I agree that' this judgment should be reversed, and a new trial had. That the defendant was guilty of negligence in leaving the horse standing unhitched and unattended is clear. Gorney v. City of New York, 102 App. Div. 259, 92 N. Y. Supp. 451. The hypothesis that plaintiff’s horse ran into defendants’ rests merely upon inference drawn from- a state of facts supported by very slight evidence. N.or can it be said, upon the evidence, that plaintiff’s driver :was *1042shown to have been guilty of contributory negligence. He was confronted with a sudden and serious peril, which necessitated quick thought and rapid action. Under such circumstances, he. is not to be charged with negligence merely because at the moment he did not adopt the best course to avoid a collision. Indeed, it is by no means clear that he did not do all that any one could have done.

The judgment should be reversed, and a new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide the event. All concur.