alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 30 Referred in House (RFH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 30

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 28, 2017

           Referred to the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
 Providing for the reappointment of Steve Case as a citizen regent of 
          the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That, in accordance with 
section 5581 of the Revised Statutes (20 U.S.C. 43), the vacancy on the 
Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution, in the class other 
than Members of Congress, occurring by reason of the expiration of the 
term of Steve Case of Virginia on April 25, 2017, is filled by the 
reappointment of the incumbent. The reappointment is for a term of 6 
years, beginning on the later of April 26, 2017, or the date of the 
enactment of this joint resolution.

            Passed the Senate March 27, 2017.

            Attest:

                                                JULIE E. ADAMS,

                                                             Secretary.
```
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-40067 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JESUS SAN MIGUEL-CRUZ, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. B-96-CR-236-1

- - - - - - - - - - October 23, 1997 Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and WIENER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Jesus San Miguel-Cruz appeals his guilty-plea conviction and sentence for reentry after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2). He argues that he was charged with and pleaded guilty to simple reentry under § 1326(a) but that he was sentenced as if he had pleaded guilty to reentry following a felony conviction pursuant to § 1326(b)(2). His argument is foreclosed by this court’s opinion in United States v. VasquezOlvera , 999 F.2d 943, 946-47 (5th Cir. 1993).No. -2-
AFFIRMED.
#### In the Matter of Alan R. Sherman, Appellant, v. Hortense W. Gabel, as Administrator of the City Rent and Rehabilitation Administration, Respondent.

In a proceeding brought by a tenant pursuant to article 78 of *890the CPLR, to review an order of the City Rent and Rehabilitation Administrator which, *inter alia,*granted an increase in the maximum rent for the tenant’s apartment, to be effective as of July 1, 1962, the tenant appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered April 13, 1964, denying his application and dismissing the petition. Judgment reversed on the law, without costs; petition granted; and respondent is directed to amend its order so as to provide that the increase in the maximum rent be effective as of February 26, 1963, and so as to direct that the landlord refund to petitioner all rents collected in excess of $80.79 per month for the period from July 1, 1962 to February 26, 1963. The findings of fact below are affirmed. In our opinion, it was improper for the respondent to make the increase in the maximum rent effective retroactively as of the commencement date of the new lease executed by the tenant and the landlord; such increase should have been effective as of the date of the local administrator’s order which first directed the increase, i.e., February 26, 1963 (Administrative Code of the City of New York, § Y 51-5.0, par. j; Rent Regulations, § 32). The fact that a voluntary 15% increase took effect upon the commencement of the new lease (Administrative Code, § Y 51-5.0, subd. g, par. [1], cl. [d]; Rent Regulations, § 33.2) is immaterial. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Christ, Brennan, Hill and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
AFS-12-562-E November 20, 2012

Exemption No. 7926E Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2002-13291

Mr. Steven L. Hotle Director/Testing Center Supervisor Pulaski Technical College 1600 West Maryland Avenue North Little Rock, AR 72120

Dear Mr. Hotle:

We are pleased to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption No. 7926, as amended. This letter explains the basis for our decision and describes its effect.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated Septem ber 17, 2012, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on behalf of Pulaski Technical College (PTC) for an extension of Exemption No. 7926, as amended. That exemption from § 65.75(a) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) permits PTC to administer the aviation mechanic general written test to students immediately following their successful completion of the general curriculum but before they meet the experience requirements of § 65.77.

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the exemption has not changed.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition

in the Federal Register because the requested extension of the exemption would not set a precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to PTC.2

Our Decision

The FAA has determ ined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 7926, as amended, remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the authority provided by 49 U.S.C. §§ 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has delegated to me, I grant your petition.

The Effect of Our Decision

Our decision extends the term ination date of Exemption No. 7926 as amended, to November 30, 2014, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

All conditions and limitations of Exemption No. 7926 remain the same. This letter will be attached to, and is a part of, Exemption No. 7926.

Sincerely,

/s/

John M. Allen Director, Flight Standards Service
Exhibit 32(b)








CERTIFICATION
FURNISHED PURSUANT TO




18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,




AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q of Progress Energy, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ending
September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the “Report”), I, Mark F. Mulhern, Senior Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:




(1)           the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)           the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.











/s/ Mark F.
Mulhern


Mark F.
Mulhern


Senior
Vice President and


Chief
Financial Officer


November
5, 2008








This
certification is being furnished and shall not be deemed filed by the Company
for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
or incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, or the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
206.202 Establishing or maintaining alternative sources. ( a ) Agencies may use this authority to totally or partially exclude a particular source from a contract action.
( b ) The determination and findings (D&F) and the documentation supporting the D&F shall identify the source to be excluded from the contract action. Include the information at PGI 206.202(b), as applicable, and any other information that may be pertinent, in the supporting documentation.
[69 FR 74991, Dec. 15, 2004]
227.7203-14 Conformity, acceptance, and warranty of computer software and computer software documentation. ( a ) *Computer software documentation.* Computer software documentation is technical data. See 227.7103-14 for appropriate guidance and statutory requirements.
( b ) *Computer software* — ( 1 ) *Conformity and acceptance.* Solicitations and contracts requiring the delivery of computer software shall specify the requirements the software must satisfy to be acceptable. Contracting officers, or their authorized representatives, are responsible for determining whether computer software tendered for acceptance conforms to the contractual requirements. Except for nonconforming restrictive markings (follow the procedures at 227.7203-12(a) if nonconforming markings are the sole reason computer software tendered for acceptance fails to conform to contractual requirements), do not accept software that does not conform in all respects to applicable contractual requirements. Correction or replacement of nonconforming software, or an equitable reduction in contract price when correction or replacement of the nonconforming data is not practicable or is not in the Government's interests, shall be accomplished in accordance with— ( i ) The provisions of a contract clause providing for inspection and acceptance of deliverables and remedies for nonconforming deliverables; or
( ii ) The procedures at FAR 46.407(c) through (g), if the contract does not contain an inspection clause providing remedies for nonconforming deliverables.
( 2 ) *Warranties* — ( i ) *Weapon systems.* Computer software that is a component of a weapon system or major subsystem should be warranted as part of the weapon system warranty. Follow the procedures at 246.7.
( ii ) *Non-weapon systems.* Approval of the chief of the contracting office must be obtained to use a computer software warranty other than a weapon system warranty. Consider the factors at FAR 46.703 in deciding whether to obtain a computer software warranty. When approval for a warranty has been obtained, the clause at 252.246-7001, Warranty of Data, and its alternates, may be appropriately modified for use with computer software or a procurement specific clause may be developed.
[56 FR 36389, July 31, 1991, as amended at 76 FR 3537, Jan. 20, 2011]
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF ACR GROUP, INC.

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the
Annual Report of ACR Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended February 29, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Anthony R. Maresca, the Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, to my knowledge that:



(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/    Anthony R. MarescaAnthony R. Maresca Chief Financial Officer
 June 1, 2004




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section
906, has been provided to ACR Group, Inc. and will be retained by ACR Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to
the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.



Exhibit 99.1
NotesFAQContact Us

Collection

Thesaurus
AdvancedSearch Tips

Collection

Thesaurus
BrowseThesaurus

 Download full text

**ERIC Number:**

**Record Type:**

**Publication Date:**

**Pages:**

**Abstractor:**

**ISBN:**

**ISSN:**

**EISSN:**

Academic PersistenceGraduation RateFederal AidFederal ProgramsParticipant CharacteristicsCollege StudentsCollege FreshmenCollege Transfer StudentsLow Income GroupsFirst Generation College StudentsDisabilities

**Publication Type:**

**Education Level:**

**Audience:**

**Language:**

**Sponsor:**

**Authoring Institution:**

**Grant or Contract Numbers:**

PrivacyCopyrightContact UsSelection PolicyAPI
JournalsNon-JournalsDownloadSubmitMultimediaWidget
# Update_Notes

# NPRM_2022PPD_Codebook

# Additional_Details
Pacific T -'il -

LLC. 

P.O. Box 20280 

Mesa, Arizon a 85277-028 0 

(888 ) 575^4546^^<>lt Fr&e^^ 

www . pacificwings.co m 

March 15 , 2011 

VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL 

Mr, Kevin Schiemmer 

Department of Transportation 

EAS and Domestic Analysis Division 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

W86-471 

Washington, DC 20590 

Dear Mr. Schiemmer, 

Please accept this correspondence as notice of Pacific Wings' 

intent to continue serving Jackson, Tennessee and Owensboro, 

Kentucky without subsidy at expiration of the current two-year 

Essential Air Service contract. 

We understand that it is a core objective of the Essential Air 

Service program to reduce and eliminate dependence on federal 

subsidies, and we have repeatedly demonstrated our ability to do so 

in communities like these all over the country. 

We are pleased to facilitate Congressional efforts to reduce the 

federal deficit by developing and actively implementing new, 

subsidy-free EAS delivery models. 

•t-fir;L 1 y , 

,reg-n\ahlstorf 

Chief Executiv e Office r 

Pacifi c Wings, L.L.C.
**U.S. Department of Education**

**Gainful Employment Negotiating Committee**

**Meeting Summary**

**November 18-20, 2013**

**Welcome**

Mr. Jeff Appel, Deputy Under Secretary of the Department, welcomed back the members of the Gainful Employment Negotiating Committee and discussed the negotiated rulemaking process for developing proposed regulations to address gainful employment issues. 

**Review and Adopt Meeting Summary**

The Committee members reviewed and approved the draft meeting summary for its September session. 

# Review  and Adopt Meeting Agenda

The members approved the draft agenda for the November session after slightly revising the order of discussion of the topics listed.

# Membership 

The following Primary and Alternate members were present.

# Public Comment

# Opportunities were provided each day for the public to provide comment.  Comments from the public were received at the end of the first and second day of the meeting.

# Logistics

# Committee members agreed to schedule a third session. This session will be held between December 9th and 20th, 2013 at the U.S. Department of Education in the 8th Floor Conference Center located at 1990 K St. NW in Washington, D.C.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 5.0.3

Eastern Division

Budd Engineering Corporation, et al.

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:12−cv−03973

Honorable Harry D.

Leinenweber

Bildau and Bussman North America GmbH,

et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Thursday, October 18, 2012:

 MINUTE entry before Honorable Harry D. Leinenweber: Cause voluntarily

dismissed by plaintiff without prejudice and without costs against defendants. Status

hearing stricekn. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice(wp, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:12-cv-03973 Document #: 21 Filed: 10/18/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:103
**Gainful Employment Negotiated Rulemaking Committee 2017-2018**

**Federal Negotiator**

**Non-Federal Negotiators**

1
Certifications:

I, Joseph F. Kruy, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10QSB of Cambex Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being
prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls;
and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls
or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any
corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses.

Date: May 1, 2006

/s/ Joseph F. Kruy
Joseph F. Kruy
President and Treasurer
(principal executive officer and principal financial officer)
USGS HomeContact USGSSearch USGS
U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2009-1001

Geological Interpretation of the Sea Floor Offshore of Edgartown, Massachusetts

Title | List of Figures | Conversion Factors | Abstract | Introduction | Setting | Methods | Bathymetry | Sidescan Sonar | Seismic Profiles | Sediments | Bottom Photography | Data Catalog | Summary | Acknowledgments | References Cited | Contacts

Figure 23. Detailed planar view of the sidescan-sonar mosaic       produced during National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration survey       H11346. View shows relatively straight to sinuous alternating bands of       high and low backscatter (tiger-stripe pattern) indicative of transverse       sand waves. Location of view is shown in figure 21. 

AccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPolicies and Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological SurveyURL: http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2009/1001/html/fig23.htmlPage Contact Information: GS Pubs Web ContactPage Last Modified: Thursday, 22-Apr-2010 15:13:17 EDT
<PAGE>
 

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

                   INFORMATION RESOURCES, INC. & SUBSIDIARIES

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED
                               PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


     We have issued our reports dated February 15, 1996 accompanying the
consolidated financial statements and schedules and, March 24, 1995 accompanying
the December 31, 1994 financial statements of IRI-SECODIP, S.N.C., included in
the Annual Report of Information Resources, Inc. & Subsidiaries on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 1995. We hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference of said reports in the Registration Statements of Information
Resources, Inc. on Forms S-8 (File Nos. 33-48289, 33-48290, 33-48291, 33-52719,
33-52721 and 33-54649).


                                 Grant Thornton LLP
 
Chicago, Illinois
March 22, 1996
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23



                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 33-48289) pertaining to the Information Resources, Inc.
Nonqualified Stock Option Plan , the Registration Statement (Form S-8 
No. 33-48290) pertaining to the Information Resources, Inc. 1992 Incentive Stock
Option Plan, the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-48291) pertaining to
the Information Resources, Inc. 1992 Executive Stock Option Plan, the
Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-52719) pertaining to the Information
Resources, Inc. Nonqualified Stock Option Plan , the Registration Statement 
(Form S-8 No. 33-52721) pertaining to the Information Resources, Inc. Employee
Nonqualified Stock Option Plan and the Registration Statement (Form S-8 
No. 33-54649) pertaining to the Information Resources, Inc. 1992 Executive Stock
Option Plan and in the related Prospectuses of our report dated February 12,
1997 with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of
Information Resources, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the
year ended December 31, 1996.

                                                     ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Chicago, Illinois
March 25, 1997
#### Mary McGlynn, Respondent, *v.*The Brooklyn City and Newtown Railroad Company, Appellant.

(Argued October 5, 1883 ;

decided October 23, 1883.)

*George A. Strong*and *Charles B. Alexander*for appellant.

*Samuel A. Morris*for respondent.

*Agree*to affirm; no opinion.

All concur.

Judgment affirmed.