alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 15 

Expressing support for the designation of October 28, 2017, as ‘‘Honoring 

the Nation’s First Responders Day’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 18, 2017 

Ms. WARREN (for herself and Mr. COTTON) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for the designation of October 28, 2017, 

as ‘‘Honoring the Nation’s First Responders Day’’. 

Whereas first responders include professional and volunteer 

fire, police, emergency medical technician, and paramedic 

workers in the United States; 

Whereas there are more than 25,300,000 first responders in 

the United States working to keep communities safe; 

Whereas first responders deserve to be recognized for their 

commitment to safety, defense, and honor; and 

Whereas October 28, 2017, would be an appropriate day to 

establish as ‘‘Honoring the Nation’s First Responders 

Day’’: Now, therefore, be it 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•SCON 15 IS 

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives 

2 concurring), That the Senate— 

3 (1) supports the designation of October 28, 

4 2017, as ‘‘Honoring the Nation’s First Responders 

5 Day’’; 

6 (2) honors and recognizes the contributions of 

7 first responders; and 

8 (3) encourages the people of the United States 

9 to observe Honoring the Nation’s First Responders 

10 Day with appropriate ceremonies and activities that 

11 promote awareness of the contributions of first re12 sponders in the United States. 

Æ 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                      OPINION OF RICHTER, USHER & VINEBERG,
                   INDEPENDENT AUDITORS FOR ALPNET CANADA INC.



To the Shareholder of
ALPNET Canada Inc.


We have audited the balance sheet of ALPNET Canada Inc. as at December 31, 1998
and the statements of earnings, deficit and changes in financial position for
the year then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the
Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards.
Those standards require that we plan and perform an audit to obtain reasonable
assurance whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An
audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well
as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.

In our opinion, these financial statements present fairly, in all material
respects, the financial position of the Company as at December 31, 1998 and the
results of its operations and the changes in its financial position for the year
then ended in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.


\s\ RICHTER, USHER & VINEBERG
Chartered Accountants



Montreal, Quebec
February 24, 1999
#### 225.871-1 Scope.

This section implements 22 U.S.C. 2767 and 10 U.S.C. 2350b.

[70 FR 73155, Dec. 9, 2005]
#### Alice Brown, Respondent, v. Hearthstone Insurance Company of Massachusetts, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: This controversy was submitted upon an agreed statement of facts. Plaintiff was named as beneficiary in certain policies issued by defendant upon the life of plaintiff’s daughter. The policies provided for payment of stated amounts if death occurred (absent certain exceptions here immaterial) “ While (insured was) driving or riding in any automobile ”. Insured met her death from carbon monoxide asphyxiation while sitting with her boy friend in an automobile parked on a private road about one tenth of a mile from a secondary road. The hour was sometime after 11:00 in the evening. The vehicle and the two bodies were found some 36 hours later. The emergency brake on the ear was set, the shifting mechanism in neutral, the heater and ignition keys were set to the “ on ” position, and the gas tank was dry. “ We all know that a contract of insurance, drawn by the insurer, must be read through the eyes of the average man on the street or the average housewife who purchases it.” *(Lachs*v. *Fidelity & Cas. Co.,*306 N. Y. 357, 364.) The dictionary defines “riding” as the act or state of one who rides. “The word ‘ride’ * **** means ‘to be carried **** * in any kind of vehicle or carriage ’ ” *(Bommarito*v. *North Amer. Acc. Ins. Co.,*251 App. Div. 123, 124). Protection was purchased from the obvious dangers to which one riding *579in an automobile may be subjected, It may be concluded from the agreed facts that at the time of death the motor of the vehicle was running and the heater operating. While the car was not moving for an unknown time, death came from one of the recognized dangers of riding in an automobile. In the speech of common men the insured was riding in the vehicle when she died. (Appeal from judgment of Allegheny Trial Term for plaintiff, in an action on insurance policies.) Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Halpern, McClusky and Henry, JJ.
#### Wilson *v.*Wilson.

March 11, 1913.

Temporary alimony. Before Judge Rawlings. Bulloch superior court. November 13, 1912.

*H. B. Strange*and *Deal <& Benfroe,*for plaintiff in error.

*Johnston é Cone,*contra.

Lumpkin, J.

Under the evidence there was no abuse of discretion in allowing the alimony and attorney’s fees awarded.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Beck, J., absent. The other Justices concwr.*
Exhibit
32.2
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the Annual Report of Security National Financial Corporation
(the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2008, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
I, Stephen M. Sill, Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and
belief:
 
 (1)
              the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
 
 (2)
              the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.
 
 By:
                      s/s Stephen M. SillStephen
      M. SillVice
      President, Treasurerand
      Chief Financial OfficerMarch
      31, 2009
# July FOIA Log
#### Central Georgia Power Company *v.*Butts County.

February 25, 1913.

Beck, J.

1. A written contract duly entered on the minutes of the county board, between the commissioners of roads and revenues of a county and a power company intending to use water to be contained in a large reservoir as its source of power, that if the county will suffer the • flooding of a certain road, the power company will make the necessary changes of location and erect the necessary bridges, all at its own expense, before the reservoir is filled, is an enforceable contract; and if for any cause specific performance of it is impossible, damages for its breach may be recovered.

*(a)*The written application by the power company, its acceptance by the proper county authorities, and the entry of both on the minutes, are sufficient to constitute a contract.

2. In a suit to enforce a contract of the nature set out in the preceding headnote, it is not necessary to affirmatively allege that the alterations in the road and the construction of the bridge are of public utility. That will be implied prima facie from the existence of the original public road contracted to be altered. If for any cause the road should be of no public utility, and the construction of the bridge unnecessary for public use, so as to relieve the power company of its obligation, such matters would be defensive to the county’s petition to enforce the contract.

3. A judgment sustaining a demurrer to a petition by the county to enjoin the power company from backing water upon the road, without first complying with its obligation to make the necessary alterations and construct the necessary bridge, is not 'a bar to the present proceeding.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*

*491Equitable petition. • Before Judge Eelton. Bibb superior court. • August 29, 1911.

*Hatcher & Smith,*for plaintiff in error.

W. *E. Watkins*and *E. J. Reagan,*contra.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT JUNE 30, 1999 AND THE RELATED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME FOR THE UNAUDITED SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,
1999 OF THREE-FIVE SYSTEMS, INC. AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. THIS EXHIBIT SHALL NOT BE
DEEMED FILED FOR PURPOSES OF SECTION 11 OF THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 AND
SECTION 18 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, OR OTHERWISE SUBJECT TO THE
LIABILITY OF SUCH SECTIONS, NOR SHALL IT BE DEEMED A PART OF ANY OTHER FILING
WHICH INCORPORATES THIS REPORT BY REFERENCE, UNLESS SUCH OTHER FILING EXPRESSLY
INCORPORATES THIS EXHIBIT BY REFERENCE.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY>   U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           5,777
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   25,223
<ALLOWANCES>                                       633
<INVENTORY>                                     15,249
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                50,217
<PP&E>                                          55,456
<DEPRECIATION>                                  19,626
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  89,583
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           28,245
<BONDS>                                         13,095
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            80
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    89,583
<SALES>                                         54,644
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                54,644
<CGS>                                           45,294
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   54,065
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    33
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 366
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    180
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (218)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                398
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       398
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.06


</TABLE>
#### 1852.225-70 Export Licenses.

As prescribed in 1825.1103-70(b), insert the following clause:

# Export Licenses (FEB 2000)

(a) The Contractor shall comply with all U.S. export control laws and regulations, including the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR), 22 CFR parts 120-130, and the Export Administration Regulations (EAR), 15 CFR parts 730-799, in the performance of this contract. In the absence of available license exemptions/exceptions, the Contractor shall be responsible for obtaining the appropriate licenses or other approvals, if required, for exports of hardware, technical data, and software, or for the provision of technical assistance.

(b) The Contractor shall be responsible for obtaining export licenses, if required, before utilizing foreign persons in the performance of this contract, including instances where the work is to be performed on-site at [insert name of NASA installation], where the foreign person will have access to export-controlled technical data or software.

(c) The Contractor shall be responsible for all regulatory record keeping requirements associated with the use of licenses and license exemptions/exceptions.

(d) The Contractor shall be responsible for ensuring that the provisions of this clause apply to its subcontractors.

(End of clause)

*Alternate I* (FEB 2000). As prescribed in 1825.1103-70(b), add the following paragraph (e) as Alternate I to the clause:

(e) The Contractor may request, in writing, that the Contracting Officer authorizes it to export ITAR-controlled technical data (including software) pursuant to the exemption at 22 CFR 125.4(b)(3). The Contracting Officer or designated representative may authorize or direct the use of the exemption where the data does not disclose details of the design, development, production, or manufacture of any defense article.

[65 FR 6916, Feb. 11, 2000, as amended at 65 FR 10033, Feb. 25, 2000]
p.1 

OAR Box 1830 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

58) IV-C-24 

Docket Number: 

A-87-11 

Printed 11/13/2008 7:20:53 AM Sheet 58 of 232 
P.2 , 

M -I 9 1988 

Honorable William 8. Broomfield 

Rouse of Representatives 

Washington, D. C . 20515 

Sear Mr. Broomfieldi 

Thank you for passing along the comments of Mr. Marvin M. 

Tamarof.f concerning BPA's proposal to reguire onboard refueling 

emission controls* Be assured that these comments will be 

considered ln the next phase of our rulemaking process. We 

will also be placing them in the public docket for the rulemaking* 

Thank you again for your concern in this matter. 

Sincerely yours, 

ORIGINAL SIGNED BY 

RICHARD D. WILSON 

Richard D. Wilson 

Director, Office of Mobile Sources 

CCt Docket A-87-ll! 

Prepare d by:PCarlso n JECTD : 8-374-827O:AL-0O62_ 

bcc : MA^tr*-.*' 

m> «•" -
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS

Certificate No. 5480

#### *In re*John Richard Cochran voluntary surrender of his certificate to practice law in the State of Kansas.

Opinion canceling certificate filed October 3, 1973.

Per *Curiam:*

On September 26, 1973, John Richard Cochran voluntarily surrendered his certificate admitting him to practice law in the courts of the State of Kansas, and it is By Order of the Court Considered and Accepted.

The Clerk of this Court is Ordered and Directed to mark the certificate Void and to Strike John Richard Cochrans name from the roll of attorneys.
1 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont 

____________________ 

NO. 09-13-00379-CR 

____________________ 

OMAR GERARDO, Appellant 

V. 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee 

_______________________________________________________ ______________ 

On Appeal from the 75th District Court 

Liberty County, Texas 

Trial Cause No. CR 30247 

________________________________________________________ _____________ 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

On June 14, 2013, the trial court accepted Omar Gerardo’s guilty plea to 

burglary of a habitation, deferred adjudication of guilt, and signed a community 

supervision order. On July 15, 2013, Gerardo filed a motion for new trial, which 

the trial court denied in a written order signed on August 9, 2013. Gerardo filed a 

notice of appeal on August 12, 2013. 

The trial court signed a certification in which the court certified that this is a 

plea-bargain case and the defendant has no right of appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 
2 

25.2(a)(2). The district clerk has provided the trial court’s certification to the Court 

of Appeals. 

On March 5, 2014, we notified the parties that we would dismiss the appeal 

unless the appellant established grounds for continuing the appeal. No response has 

been filed. Because the trial court’s certification shows the defendant does not have 

the right of appeal, we must dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d). 

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. 

APPEAL DISMISSED. 

 

 

 ________________________________ 

 CHARLES KREGER 

 Justice 

Opinion Delivered April 9, 2014 

Do Not Publish 

Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ.
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32(a)
                      18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION


I hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and
belief, that the accompanying Form 10-KSB of Spectrum Laboratories, Inc., (the
"Company") for the annual period ended December 27, 2003 fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d); and that the information contained in this Form 10-KSB
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.

Dated: March 26, 2004



/s/ Roy T. Eddleman
-------------------------------------
Roy T. Eddleman
Chief Executive Officer
Spectrum Laboratories, Inc.




                                  EXHIBIT 32(b)
                      18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION


I hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and
belief, that the accompanying Form 10-KSB of Spectrum Laboratories, Inc., (the
"Company") for the annual period ended December 27, 2003 fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d); and that the information contained in this Form 10-KSB
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.

Dated: March 26, 2004



/s/ Brian A. Watts
-------------------------------------
Brian A. Watts
Chief Financial Officer
Spectrum Laboratories, Inc.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration 
Statements on Forms S-8 (No. 33-62988, No. 33-60690, No. 33-77104, No. 
33-83176, No. 33-94360 and No. 333-08785) of our report dated February 7, 
1997 appearing on page 36 of Tencor Instruments Annual Report on Form 10-K 
for the year ended December 31, 1996.

Price Waterhouse LLP
San Jose, California
March 6, 1997
M. P. No. 74-286.

#### Richardino Santos *v.*James W. Mullen, *Warden.*

*Julius C. Michaelson,*Attorney General, for respondent.

Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied. *Alton W. Wiley,*for petitioner.
#### 1335.017 Federal funded research and development centers.
C. A. No. 73-273.

#### State *v.*Harvey C. Simmons.

*Julius C. Michaelson,*Attorney *937General, *Judith Romney Wegner,*Special Asst. Attorney General, for plaintiff. *John Tramonti, Jr.,*for defendant.

*936Motion for an attorney’s fee and costs, pursuant to G. L. 1956 (1969 Reenactment) §9-24-32, is granted. John Tramonti, Jr., is awarded the sum- of $2,307.20.
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-23-00228-CR

ANGEL GABRIEL GRIMALDO

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

On Appeal from the

24th District Court of Calhoun County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2021-CR-8511-DC

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

April 4, 2024
III 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 49 

Providing for a correction in the enrollment of S. 2553. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 28, 2018 

Ms. STABENOW submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 

considered and agreed to 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Providing for a correction in the enrollment of S. 2553. 

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives 

2 concurring), That in the enrollment of the bill S. 2553, 

3 the Secretary of the Senate shall make the following cor4 rection: 

5 Amend the title so as to read: ‘‘A bill to amend 

6 title XVIII of the Social Security Act to prohibit 

7 Medicare part D plans from restricting pharmacies 

8 from informing individuals regarding the prices for 

9 certain drugs and biologicals.’’. 

Æ 


amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with BILLS
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. AP-76,905

EX PARTE WILLIAM LEE BAUM, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 3669 IN THE 100 DISTRICT COURT TH

FROM DONLEY COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of indecency with

a child and sentenced to ten years’ imprisonment. The Seventh Court of Appeals affirmed his

conviction. Baum v. State, No. 07-10-00166-CR (Tex. App.–Amarillo January 4, 2011).

Applicant contends that his appellate counsel rendered ineffective assistance because counsel

failed to timely notify Applicant that his conviction had been affirmed. 

Appellate counsel filed an affidavit with the trial court. Based on that affidavit, the trial court

has entered findings of fact and conclusions of law that appellate counsel failed to timely notify
2

Applicant that his conviction had been affirmed. The trial court recommends that relief be granted. 

Ex parte Wilson, 956 S.W.2d 25 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997). 

We find, therefore, that Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of-time petition

for discretionaryreview of the judgment of the Seventh Court of Appeals in Cause No. 07-10-00166-

CR that affirmed his conviction in Cause No. 3669 from the 100 District Court of DonleyCounty. 

th

Applicant shall file his petition for discretionary review with this Court within 30 days of the date

on which this Court’s mandate issues.

Delivered: October 31, 2012

Do not publish