alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EERE Information Center Programs and Offices Search Help More Search Options

Printable Version 

## Fluorescent Lamp Ballasts Preliminary Technical Support Document The U.S. Department of Energy prepared this preliminary technical support document for the analyses conducted for its energy conservation standards rulemaking on fluorescent lamp ballasts.

The following documents are available as Adobe Acrobat PDFs. Download Adobe Reader

. Title Page ( PDF 63 KB ) Executive Summary ( PDF 402 KB ) Updated April 27, 2010



### Chapters Chapter 1. Introduction ( PDF 163 KB ) Chapter 2. Analytical Framework ( PDF 517 KB ) Chapter 3. Market and Technology Assessment ( PDF 586 KB ) Chapter 4. Screening Analysis ( PDF 132 KB ) Chapter 5. Engineering Analysis ( PDF 1.1 MB ) Chapter 6. Energy Use Characterization ( PDF 211 KB ) Chapter 7. Markups Analysis ( PDF 224 KB ) Chapter 8. Life-Cycle Cost and Payback Period Analyses ( PDF 392 KB ) Updated April 27, 2010 Chapter 9. Shipments Analysis ( PDF 356 KB ) Updated April 27, 2010 Chapter 10. National Impacts Analysis ( PDF 576 KB ) Chapter 11. Life-Cycle Cost Sub-Group Analysis ( PDF 69 KB ) Chapter 12. Manufacturer Impact Analysis ( PDF 201 KB ) Chapter 13. Utility Impact Analysis ( PDF 99 KB ) Chapter 14. Employment Impact Analysis ( PDF 106 KB )



### Reports Environmental Assessment ( PDF 129 KB ) Regulatory Impact Analysis ( PDF 110 KB )



### Appendices Appendix AA. Acronyms and Abbreviations ( PDF 79 KB ) Appendix 3A. U.S. Code and Code of Federal Regulations ( PDF 253 KB ) Appendix 5A. Material Prices ( PDF 109 KB ) Appendix 5B. T5 Baseline Ballasts ( PDF 135 KB ) Appendix 5C. Test Data ( PDF 215 KB ) Updated April 29, 2010 Appendix 5D. Max-Tech ( PDF 146 KB ) Appendix 8A. User Instructions for Life-Cycle Cost Spreadsheet ( PDF 45 KB ) Appendix 10A. User Instructions for National Impact Analysis Spreadsheet ( PDF 51 KB ) Appendix 12A. Interview Guide ( PDF 234 KB ) Appendix EA-SCC. Social Cost of Carbon for Regulatory Impact Analysis Under Executive Order 12866 ( PDF 1.0 MB )



### Contact Information
Linda Graves Project Manager 202-586-1851

Printable Version

Building Technologies Program Home | EERE Home | U.S. Department of Energy Webmaster| Web Site Policies | Security & Privacy | USA.gov Content Last Updated: 04/30/2010 

## Appliances and Commercial Equipment Standards: Fluorescent Lamp Ball... http://www1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/appliance_standard s/residential/f...

1 of 1 5/5/2010 7:43 PM
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.1 SECTION 302 CERTIFICATIONof
Chief Executive Officer I, Mark A.
Libratore, certify that: 1. I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Liberator Medical Holdings,
Inc. (“the Small Business Issuer”). 2. Based on my
knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; 3. Based on my
knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Small Business Issuer as
of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report; 4. The Small
Business Issuer’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Small Business Issuer,
and we have: (a) Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the Small Business Issuer, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared; (b) Evaluated
the effectiveness of the Small Business Issuer’s disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and (c) Disclosed
in this report any change in the Small Business Issuer’s internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the Small Business Issuer’s
most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the Small Business Issuer’s internal control
over financial reporting; and 5. The Small
Business Issuer’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
Small Business Issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of Small
Business Issuer’s Board of Directors (or persons fulfilling the
equivalent function): (a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the Small Business Issuer’s ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and (b) Any fraud,
whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the Small Business Issuer’s internal controls. Date: August 20, 2007 /s/ Mark A.
LibratoreMark
A. Libratore, Chief Executive Officer  1
234.7101 Solicitation provision and contract clause. ( a ) Use the basic or the alternate of the provision at 252.234-7003, Notice of Cost and Software Data Reporting System, in any solicitation that includes the basic or the alternate of the clause at 252.234-7004, Cost and Software Data Reporting. ( 1 ) Use the basic provision when the solicitation includes the clause at 252.234-7004, Cost and Software Data Reporting—Basic.
( 2 ) Use the alternate I provision when the solicitation includes the clause at 252.234-7004, Cost and Software Data Reporting—Alternate I.
( b ) Use the basic or the alternate of the clause at 252.234-7004, Cost and Software Data Reporting System, in solicitations that include major defense acquisition programs as follows: ( 1 ) Use the basic clause in solicitations and contracts for major defense acquisition programs that exceed $50 million.
( 2 ) Use the alternate I clause in solicitations and contracts for major defense acquisition programs with a value equal to or greater than $20 million, but less than or equal to $50 million, when so directed by the program manager with the approval of the OSD Deputy Director, Cost Assessment.
[79 FR 65593, Nov. 5, 2014, as amended at 88 FR 46904, July 20, 2023]
Functional Statements > Federal Student Aid

## I. MISSION AND RESPONSIBILITIES

The Chief Operating Officer for Federal Student Aid manages the administrative and oversight functions supporting programs authorized under Title I and Title IV of the Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended (HEA) and the Health Education Assistance Loan (HEAL) program transferred to the U.S. Department of Education (Department or ED) from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services under P.L. 113-76. Federal Student Aid is established under Title I, Part D of the HEA and performs the responsibilities assigned to it under that authority and advises the Secretary on these matters.

The Office directs, coordinates, and recommends policies for programs that are designed to provide financial assistance to eligible students enrolled in postsecondary educational institutions. This assistance includes: grants, loans, and work-study assistance to nearly 12.9 million students through approximately 6,100 postsecondary institutions.

## II. ORGANIZATION

Federal Student Aid is under the supervision of the Chief Operating Officer for Federal Student Aid who reports to the Secretary of Education.

## III. ORDER OF SUCCESSION

In the event that the Chief Operating Officer dies, resigns or is otherwise unable to perform the functions and duties of the Office and the office is thereby deemed to be vacant, and the Secretary has not designated in writing another individual to act as the Chief Operating Officer, the following officials, in the order shown, shall perform the functions and duties of the office in an acting capacity.

In instances where the office of the Chief Operating Officer is filled, but the head of the Office is absent, unavailable, otherwise unable to perform the functions and duties of the position, and/or there is a disruption in the normal channels of direction and communication, and unless the head of the Office or the Secretary, in writing, designates another individual to act as the Chief Operating Officer, the following officials, in the order shown, shall serve in an acting capacity as the Chief Operating Officer:

- Principal Deputy to the Chief Operating Officer
- Chief of Staff
- Deputy Chief Operating Officer, Student Experience and Aid Delivery
- Deputy Chief Operating Officer, Partner Participation and Oversight
#### SNJ Trading Corp. v. James Lewis.

Motion to dismiss appeal granted, with $10 costs, unless the appellant procures the record on appeal and appellant’s points to be served and filed on or before March 28, 1961, with notice of argument for the May 1961 Term of this court, said appeal to be argued or submitted when reached. Concur — Valente, J. P., McNally, Stevens, Eager and Steuer, JJ.
115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 41 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Whereas United States and Australian troops first fought together in and won the Battle of Hamel on the Western 

Front in France on July 4, 1918, under the command of 

Australian General John Monash; 

Whereas the hard fought victory achieved by the combined 

forces at Hamel helped turn the tide of World War I; 

Whereas Australia has fought together with the United 

States in every major conflict since 1918; 

Whereas more than 100,000 Australian service members have 

given the ultimate sacrifice alongside their brothers and 

sisters in arms from the United States; 

Whereas the United States and Australia officially established bilateral diplomatic relations on January 8, 1940; 

Whereas the United States and Australia formalized their security alliance with the signing of the Australia, New 

Zealand, United States Security Treaty, done at San 

Francisco September 1, 1951 (commonly known as the 

ANZUS Treaty); 

Whereas the ANZUS Treaty was invoked the first and only 

time in response to the terrorist attacks on the United 

States on September 11, 2001; 
2 

†SCON 41 ES 

Whereas the United States and Australia share information 

essential for security and defense through the Five Eyes 

intelligence alliance; 

Whereas the Force Posture Agreement between the Government of Australia and the Government of the United 

States of America, done at Sydney August 12, 2014, enables closer security and defense cooperation between the 

2 allies; 

Whereas the United States and Australia conduct diverse 

joint military exercises and training to enhance capabilities throughout the world, and Australia hosts United 

States Marines at bases in its Northern Territory; 

Whereas the United States and Australia work closely in a 

number of international fora, including the Group of 

Twenty (G–20); 

Whereas the Australia–United States Free Trade Agreement, 

done at Washington May 18, 2004, came into effect on 

January 1, 2005; 

Whereas the United States and Australia conduct 

$65,000,000,000 in 2-way trade and have an investment 

relationship valued at $1,100,000,000,000, 

Whereas, July 4, 2018, marks the 100-year anniversary of 

the Battle of Hamel and serves as the date on which the 

United States and Australia celebrate the first 100 years 

of Mateship: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives 

2 concurring), That Congress— 

3 (1) commemorates the 100-year anniversary of 

4 the Battle of Hamel, forging the unique and endur-
3 

†SCON 41 ES 

1 ing relationship between the United States and Aus2 tralia; 

3 (2) reaffirms the strong military alliance rela4 tionship between the United States and Australia; 

5 and 

6 (3) supports continued diplomatic, security, and 

7 economic cooperation between the United States and 

8 Australia. 

Passed the Senate July 10, 2018. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 
115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 41 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Recognizing 100 years of the United StatesAustralia relationship — 100 years of Mateship.
NOTE : This order is nonprecedential. 

# United States Court of Appeals **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________ CHOUDHURY SALEKIN, Petitioner

v.

OFFICE OF SPECIAL COUNSEL, Respondent

______________________
2024

- 2068

______________________ Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in No. CB

- 1216

- 18

- 0004

- T

- 1

.

______________________ O R D E R

The petitioner having failed to pay the docketing fee required by Federal Circuit Rule 52 (a) (1) and to file the required Statement Concerning Discrimination, it is

ORDERED that the petition for review be, and the same hereby is, DISMISSED, for failure to prosecute in Case: 24-2068 Document: 5 Page: 1 Filed: 09/20/2024S ALEKIN V

. OSC 2

accordance with the rules.

FOR THE COURT

September 20, 2024 Date Case: 24-2068 Document: 5 Page: 2 Filed: 09/20/2024
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Michael Walsh, Appellant.

In a *coram nobis*proceeding, defendant appeals from an order of the County Court, Nassau County, dated November 13, 1963, which denied without a hearing his application to vacate a judgment of said court rendered May 8, 1959 on his plea of guilty, convicting him of forgery in the second *degree,*and imposing sentence. On the basis of such conviction, defendant was sentenced by the same court on April 21, 1960 as a second felony offender upon his conviction of another crime. Order affirmed. No opinion. Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Brennan, JJ., concur.
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

**CertificationPursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

** **

In connection with thefiling of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005(the “Report”) by Cascade Natural Gas Corporation (the “Company”), each of theundersigned hereby certifies that:

 

1.                                       TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2.                                       Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Cascade NaturalGas Corporation and will be retained by Cascade Natural Gas Corporation andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or staff upon request.

 

 
|   | /s/ David W.  Stevens                  |   |
|--------|----------------------------------------|--------|
|   | David W. Stevens                       |   |
|   | President and  Chief Executive Officer |   |
|   |                                   |   |
|   |                                   |   |
|   | /s/ Rick A.  Davis                     |   |
|   | Rick A. Davis                          |   |
|   | Chief Financial  Officer               |   |

 

----
#### 207.500 Scope of subpart.

This subpart also implements 10 U.S.C. 4508.

[70 FR 14573, Mar. 23, 2005, as amended at 87 FR 76990, Dec. 16, 2022]
**Exhibit 32**

March 31, 2006

Via EDGAR

Securities and Exchange CommissionJudiciary Plaza450 Fifth Street, N.W.Washington, D.C. 20549

Re:      Certification pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Ladies and Gentlemen:

In connection with the Annual Report of Mesa OffshoreTrust (the “Trust”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), the undersigned, not in its individual capacity but solely asthe trustee of the Trust, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to itsknowledge:

(1)         The Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)         The information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Trust.

Theabove certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) and is not being filed as part ofthe Form 10-K or as a separate disclosure document.
|        | JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.       |
|--------|---------------------------------|
|   | Trustee for Mesa Offshore Trust |
|   | By:                             | /s/ MIKE ULRICH |
|   |                            | Mike Ulrich |
|   |                            | *Vice President and Trust Officer* |

 

----
#### Pacific Fruit Express Company, Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Beech-Nut Life Savers, Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Appellant.

Judgment unanimously reversed on the law and facts and third-party complaint dismissed, without costs of this appeal to either party. Memorandum: (Same as filed in companion case of *Salerno*v. *New York Cent. R. R. Co.,*21 A D 2d 850). (Appeal from judgment of Monroe Trial Term in favor of third-party *851plaintiff, Pacific Fruit Express Company, in a negligence action.) Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Henry, Noonan and Del Veechio, JJ.
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Cagles, Inc. for the period ended September 27, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-Q), I, J. Douglas Cagle, Chief Executive Officer of Cagles, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:  1. The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, and  2. The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date: November 11, 2008  By: /s/ J. Douglas Cagle J. Douglas Cagle Chief Executive Officer          CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Cagles, Inc. for the period ended September 27, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-Q), I, Mark M. Ham IV, Chief Financial Officer of Cagles, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:  1. The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, and  2. The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date: November 11, 2008  By: /s/ Mark M. Ham IV Mark M. Ham IV Chief Financial Officer
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

G AND G CLOSED CIRCUIT EVENTS, 

LLC, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

 v. 

MICHAEL RETO, DBA The Lab, 

individually, 

Defendant-Appellee.

No. 21-56055 

D.C. No. 

2:19-cv-07915-WDK-JC 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

William D. Keller, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 10, 2022**

Pasadena, California

Before: McKEOWN and IKUTA, Circuit Judges, and DANIELS,*** District 

Judge.

G and G Closed Circuit Events, LLC, appeals the district court’s order 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

*** The Honorable George B. Daniels, United States District Judge for the 

Southern District of New York, sitting by designation.

FILED

AUG 24 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 

granting summary judgment on its 47 U.S.C. §§ 553 and 605 claims and declining 

to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over its state law claims. We have 

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and we affirm.

This is one of three appeals brought by G and G that implicate the 

application of 47 U.S.C. §§ 553 and 605 to commercial programs that are 

broadcast over the internet. All three appeals raise identical issues, the substance 

of which we addressed in our opinion in G and G Closed Circuit Events, LLC v. 

Liu, No. 21-56047, __ F.4th __ (9th Cir. 2022). For the reasons explained in our 

opinion, we affirm the district court’s order.

In this case, as in Liu, the district court granted G and G ample opportunity 

to conduct discovery on the method by which the commercial program was 

broadcast. And here, as in Liu, G and G declined to take advantage of this 

opportunity and instead relied on conclusory statements regarding the method of 

transmission. It was G and G’s burden at summary judgment to come forward 

with evidence establishing a genuine dispute of material fact. See Celotex Corp. v. 

Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 322–23 (1986). Because G and G failed to carry this 

burden, summary judgment was appropriate.

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 10.11

                             Stock Option Agreement


Number of Shares:  500,000                      Date of Grant:  14 February 2000




This Stock Option Agreement is made this 30 December 1999 by and between Terry
J. Holmes (the "Optionee") and MedGrup Corporation, a Colorado corporation (the
"Company").

     1.   Grant of Option. The Company, pursuant to the provisions of the
          Company's Incentive Stock Option Plan (`Plan"), attached hereto,
          hereby grants to the Optionee, subject to the terms and conditions set
          forth or incorporated herein, an Option to purchase from the Company
          all or any part of an aggregate of the number of Common Shares
          indicated above, all at the purchase price of $1.31 per Share. All of
          the terms and provisions of the Plan are incorporated herein by
          reference.

          In the event of any conflict between this Agreement and the Plan, the
          Plan shall control.

     2.   Exercise. This Option shall be exercisable in whole or in part (in
          multiples of 1,000 Shares, unless for the balance of this Option).
          This Option shall expire on the seventh anniversary of the Date of
          Grant stated above.

          This Option vests at a rate of 83,333 every six months beginning on
          the sixth month anniversary of the aforementioned Date of Grant.

          This Option shall be exercisable by delivery to the Company of a copy
          of this Stock Option Agreement and manually signed notice of election
          to exercise, in the form attached hereto, specifying the number of
          Shares to be purchase. Payment of the purchase price shall be as
          stated in the Plan or allowed by the Board of Directors.



              MedGrup Corporation




              William D. Cronin
              CEO