alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 11 (Tuesday, January 19, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 5144]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-01095]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

[RTID 0648-XA820]


North Pacific Fishery Management Council; Public Meeting

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of web conference.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The North Pacific Fishery Management Council's (Council) 
Social Science Planning Team (SSPT) will meet March 4, 2021.

DATES: The meeting will be held on Thursday, March 4, 2021, from 8 a.m. 
to 4 p.m., Alaska Time.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be a web conference. Join online through 
the link at https://meetings.npfmc.org/Meeting/Details/1886.
    Council address: North Pacific Fishery Management Council, 1007 W 
3rd Ave., Anchorage, AK 99501-2252; telephone: (907) 271-2809. 
Instructions for attending the meeting via video conference are given 
under SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sarah Marrinan, Council staff; phone: 
(907) 271-2809; email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#65160417040d4b080417170c0b040b250b0a04044b020a13"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="4033213221286e2d213232292e212e002e2f21216e272f36">[email protected]</span></a>. For technical support 
please contact our admin Council staff, email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#4e203e28232d602f2a2327200e20212f2f60292138"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="89e7f9efe4eaa7e8ede4e0e7c9e7e6e8e8a7eee6ff">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Agenda

Thursday, March 4, 2021

    The SSPT agenda will meet to discuss the Economic Data Reporting 
(EDR) stakeholder meetings, propose alternatives for the Council to 
consider, and other business. The agenda is subject to change, and the 
latest version will be posted at https://meetings.npfmc.org/Meeting/Details/1886 prior to the meeting, along with meeting materials.

Connection Information

    You can attend the meeting online using a computer, tablet, or 
smart phone; or by phone only. Connection information will be posted 
online at: https://meetings.npfmc.org/Meeting/Details/1886.

Public Comment

    Public comment letters will be accepted and should be submitted 
electronically to https://meetings.npfmc.org/Meeting/Details/1886.

(Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.)

    Dated: January 13, 2021.
Rey Israel Marquez,
Acting Deputy Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National 
Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2021-01095 Filed 1-15-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

May 31, 2005

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 04-16021

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 03-00281-CV-T-26-MSS

BILLY RAY PHILLIPS,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

CITY OF SARASOTA,

a municipal corporation,

Defendant-Appellee.

__________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Middle District of Florida

_________________________

(May 31, 2005)

Before TJOFLAT, DUBINA and BARKETT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Billy Ray Phillips, an African-American male, appeals a district court order

granting summary judgment in favor of the City of Sarasota (“City”), Phillips’
2

former employer, based on his claim of unlawful discrimination, pursuant to Title

VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, et seq. 

Phillips argues that the district court erred when it granted summary

judgment in favor of the City based on its determination that because only he had

violated a restraining order, he could present no evidence showing that the

Caucasian officers in his department were similarly situated for purposes of

showing disparate treatment. Specifically, Phillips argues that the district court

should have evaluated the “comparative seriousness” of the underlying incidents

involving the Caucasian officers because the evidence shows that several of the

Caucasian officers engaged in misconduct, such as attempted murder and

aggravated battery, that was much more serious than his “minor domestic spat.”

We review de novo the district court’s grant of summary judgment, viewing

all evidence and factual inferences reasonably drawn from the evidence in the light

most favorable to the nonmoving party. Burton v. Tampa Housing Authority, 271

F.3d 1274, 1276-77 (11th Cir. 2001). 

Upon review of the record, and upon consideration of the parties’ briefs, we

find no reversible error. We conclude that the district court properly granted

summary judgment in favor of the City because Phillips was fired for, among other

things, violating a temporary injunction on a number of separate occasions, and
3

because the evidence showed that his former Caucasian co-employees, none of

whom had violated a temporary injunction, were not in fact sufficiently similarly

situated to be used as comparators.

AFFIRMED.
#### 1825.003-70 NASA definitions.

“Canadian end product”, for an item with an estimated value of $25,000 or less, means an unmanufactured end product mined or produced in Canada or an end product manufactured in Canada, if the cost of its components mined, produced, or manufactured in Canada or the United States exceeds 50 percent of the cost of all its components. The cost of components includes transportation costs to the place of incorporation into the end product. For an end product with an estimated value in excess of $25,000, the definition at FAR 25.003 applies.
225.301-4 Contract clause. ( 1 ) Use the clause at FAR 52.225-19, Contractor Personnel in a Designated Operational Area or Supporting a Diplomatic or Consular Mission Outside the United States, in accordance with the prescription at FAR 25.301-4, except that— ( i ) The clause shall also be used in personal services contracts with individuals; and
( ii ) The clause shall not be used when all contractor personnel performing outside the United States will be covered by the clause at 252.225-7040.
( 2 ) When using the clause at FAR 52.225-19, the contracting officer shall inform the contractor that the Synchronized Predeployment and Operational Tracker (SPOT) is the appropriate automated system to use for the list of contractor personnel required by paragraph (g) of the clause. Information on the SPOT system is available at *https://spot.dmdc.mil* and *http://www.acq.osd.mil/log/PS/ctr_mgt_accountability.html .*
[73 FR 16774, Mar. 31, 2008, as amended at 74 FR 34265, July 15, 2009; 80 FR 67255, Oct. 30, 2015]
Order entered November 30, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-16-01224-CV

GLOBAL TEL*LINK CORPORATION, Appellant

V.

SECURUS TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Appellee

On Appeal from the 44th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-16-05352

ORDER

Before the Court is appellee’s November 23, 2016 unopposed motion for an extension of 

time to file briefs. We GRANT appellee’s motion.

We ORDER appellee to file its brief on or before December 16, 2016.

We ORDER appellant to file its reply brief on or before January 5, 2017.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

JUSTICE
IA 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 35 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 28, 2017 

Referred to the Committee on House Administration 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for the appointment of Michael Govan as a citizen 

regent of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That, in accordance with section 5581 of the Revised Stat4 utes (20 U.S.C. 43), the vacancy of the Board of Regents 

5 of the Smithsonian Institution, in the class other than 

6 Members of Congress, occurring by reason of the expira7 tion of the term of Dr. Shirley Ann Jackson of New York 

8 on May 5, 2017, is filled by the appointment of Michael 

9 Govan of California. The appointment is for a term of 6 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

SJ 35 RFH 

1 years, beginning on May 6, 2017, or the date of the enact2 ment of this joint resolution, whichever occurs later. 

Passed the Senate March 27, 2017. 

Attest: JULIE E. ADAMS, 

Secretary. 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32(c)








CERTIFICATION FURNISHED PURSUANT TO




18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,




AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Carolina Power & Light Company (the “Company”) for the period ended March 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Lloyd M. Yates, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)           the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)           the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.











/s/ Lloyd M. Yates


Lloyd M. Yates


President and Chief Executive Officer


May 8, 2012








This certification is being furnished and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                EXHIBIT 10.13.2


                 FIRST AMENDMENT TO ART COATED SUPPLY AGREEMENT
                                 BY AND BETWEEN
            SOUZA CRUZ S.A. AND COMPANHIA INDUSTRIAL DE PAPEL PIRAHY
                          DATED AS OF FEBRUARY 2, 1998


This First Amendment to Art Coated Supply Agreement is entered into by and
between Schweitzer-Mauduit do Brasil, S.A., successor in interest to Companhia
Industrial de Papel Pirahy, and Souza Cruz S.A. this 23rd day of February,
2000.

The parties hereto agree to amend the Art Coated Supply Agreement as follows:

         1.       The first two sentences of Article VIII, Term, subsection
(a), shall be deleted in their entirety and replaced with the following new
sentences:

                  "This Agreement will remain in force for an initial period of
                  six (6) years from the date of its execution. The Parties
                  agree that, prior to the expiry of the initial six year term,
                  they will negotiate in good faith for a further extension of
                  the Agreement on such terms as they deem suitable."

         2.       Except as expressly amended herein, the terms and conditions
of the Supply Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.



Schweitzer-Mauduit do Brasil, S.A.                    Souza Cruz S.A.

By:                                         By:
   --------------------------------            ------------------------------

Title:                                      Title:
      -----------------------------               ---------------------------



Witnessed by:                               Witnessed by:


----------------------------------          ---------------------------------
Signature                                   Signature


----------------------------------          ---------------------------------
Print Name                                  Print name


----------------------------------          ---------------------------------
Identification Number                       Identification Number
FY 2012 Annual Performance Report and FY 2014 Annual Performance Plan: download filesPDF (2M)

President's FY 2014 Budget Request for the U.S. Department of Education

|Last Modified: 04/10/2013
|-------------------------
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR FISCAL 2000 AS FILED IN THE COMPANY'S FORM 10K AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10K FOR THE FISCAL YEAR
ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         105,954
<SECURITIES>                                    20,987
<RECEIVABLES>                                  223,909
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,973
<INVENTORY>                                    287,594
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               677,529
<PP&E>                                         407,591
<DEPRECIATION>                                 208,894
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 892,372
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          232,018
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     14,976
<COMMON>                                       429,986
<OTHER-SE>                                     180,231
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   892,372
<SALES>                                        842,309
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               842,309
<CGS>                                          474,686
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  474,686
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,028
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 73,158
<INCOME-TAX>                                    26,337
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             46,821
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    46,821
<EPS-BASIC>                                     1.39
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.31


</TABLE>
#### 217.7000 Scope of subpart.

This subpart prescribes policy and procedures for exchange of nonexcess personal property concurrent with an acquisition. 40 U.S.C. 503 permits exchange of personal property and application of the exchange allowance to the acquisition of similar property. This subpart does not authorize the sale of nonexcess personal property.

[63 FR 11529, Mar. 9, 1998, as amended at 77 FR 35880, June 15, 2012]
#### 209.170-0 Scope.

This section implements section 1062 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021 (Pub. L. 116-283).

[88 FR 67609, Sept. 29, 2023]
ATTORNE GRIEVANCE COMMISSION

OF MARYLAND

Petitioner V.

NANCY A. COHEN IN THE COURT OF APPEALS " OF MARYLAND ' Misc. Docket AG No. 22 * September Term, 2015 * Respondent. ORDER This matier came before the Court on the Joint Petition for Reprimand by Consent filed by the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland and Respondent, Nancy A. Cohen. The Court, having considered the Petition and the record herein, it is this 18thday of November, 2015, ORDERED, that Respondent, Nancy A. Cohen, be and she is hereby REPRIMANDED for violating Rule 1.9(a) of the Maryland Lawyers' Rules of Professional Conduct.

/s/ Lynne A. Battaglia Senior Judge
MS. cjflfa S-l^Jr, cA/yt , ___———

/577 \tf*sr/&rr stfterfc'. /"//J*- tec/T <zs&£- a/0.'. 3/675"

7# /?Ws^ //* AfoTWfe /^4/fa^S^c^Jti^

To 7M1 20 'l»s/*r&Sr~ /^M^o^^mj^, 7*&s, A6p **jv

Jjs> m 4$wr /f sf/<Sr */"p ^^/ M^/^s _

MS /**, inw &*' -*" fis&vfy J^yic^j ^M^r^e

fML //fa ML ** Pfi /ff*sr~fofrf»*~ 7#t 5a^

if ofcu Jrffc /fai± ffUhSW&., //&&- 2>o /f<fT~MSffTTZ 70

6oA3Ucr MZ /r 7^ #hfa> fMih sfafr&s.

-/-
/*A 7&f/<3 %k&.

£Sv£V^ uvTT^ 7~^c^'

f!4/tS7>^,

i

%

•-£•:.
#### 225.7017 Utilization of domestic photovoltaic devices.
**Exhibit 32.2**

**Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,As adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection with the filing of the Annual Report onForm 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the “Report”) by Aspyra, Inc.(“Registrant”), each of the undersigned hereby certifies that to theirknowledge:

1.           The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended, and

2.             Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of Registrant as of and forthe periods presented in the Report.

 

Date:August 31, 2006

 
| /S/ Anahita Villafane                      |   |
|--------------------------------------------|--------|
| Anahita Villafane, Chief Financial Officer |

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to Aspyra, Inc. and will be furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

----
MEMORANDUM

Date: November 12, 2021

To: U.S. Department of Education

From: Persis Yu and Joshua Rovenger, Negotiators for Legal Assistance Organizations that Represent 

Students and/or Borrowers

Re: Borrower Defense Group Process Proposals

We appreciate the Department’s willingness to consider alternative proposals for the group 

borrower defense process. In light of our discussion at Session 2, we propose the following:

• The Department should strike sub-section (c) of § 685.402 and replace it with the 

following:

(c) State and third-party initiated group application. The Secretary shall consider a group 

borrower defense application from States, State attorneys general, State oversight or regulatory 

agencies, or legal aid representatives.

1

(1) To initiate a group borrower defense application, the third-party applicant must 

submit an application to the Secretary, on a form approved by the Secretary –

(i) Identifying the requested group, including at minimum:

(A) The name of the institution;

(B) Campuses or programs, if applicable;

(C) A description of the conduct that forms the basis for the borrower 

defense claim under the federal standard in section 685.401(b) or 

under the applicable state standard in [Cross-Reference];

(D)The period under which the conduct in (c)(1)(i)(C) of this section 

occurred;

(ii) Providing evidence that supports the claims made in paragraph 

(c)(1)(i); and 

(2) The third-party applicant must provide any other information or supporting 

documentation reasonably requested by the Secretary. 

1 To the extent that the Department has concerns about additional third-party representatives: (1) there is no bar in the 

HEA or otherwise that would preclude such inclusion, and (2) the underlying principles of organizational and associational 

standing support doing so. We are happy to further discuss the authority for this change. 
(3) The Secretary must adjudicate the group discharge application unless the Secretary 

has formed a similar group under paragraph (b) of this Section. If the Secretary 

has formed such a group, the Secretary shall notify the third-party applicant and 

hold the group submission in abeyance pending the resolution of the Secretaryinitiated group claim. 

(4) The Secretary shall adjudicate the merits of a group application submitted pursuant 

to this sub-section within 365 days of receipt and shall issue a written decision 

consistent with the requirements of § 685.406. 

(5) The denial of a group borrower defense application submitted pursuant to this 

sub-section shall not have any preclusive effect on a borrower submitting an 

individual borrower defense application regarding the same conduct at the same 

school. 

(6) The third-party applicant may request reconsideration of the decision consistent 

with § 685.407.

• Maintain (i) and (ii) in sub-section (d), but replace the text in sub-section (d) with:

(d) Borrower status after group formation or group application. (1) Upon formation of a group 

of borrowers under sub-section (b), or upon receipt of a group application under sub-section 

(c), the Secretary –
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-06-00317-CR

Jack Nelson Stafford, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF LLANO COUNTY, 33RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 5705, HONORABLE V. MURRAY JORDAN, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant’s brief was originally due September 11, 2006. On the motion of

appellant’s retained attorney, Mr. Kirby J. Roberts, the time for filing was extended to November

11, 2006. No brief has been filed on appellant’s behalf and no further extension of time for filing

has been sought.

The appeal is abated. The trial court shall conduct a hearing to determine whether

appellant desires to prosecute this appeal, whether appellant is indigent, and, if he is not indigent,

whether retained counsel has abandoned this appeal. Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b)(2). The court shall

make appropriate findings and recommendations. A record from this hearing, including copies of

all findings and orders and a transcription of the court reporter’s notes, shall be forwarded to the
2

Clerk of this Court for filing as a supplemental record no later than January 19, 2007.

Rule 38.8(b)(3).

__________________________________________

Jan P. Patterson, Justice

Before Justices Patterson, Pemberton and Waldrop

Filed: December 13, 2006

Do Not Publish
232.7003 Procedures. ( a ) DoD officials receiving payment requests in electronic form shall process the payment requests in electronic form. The WAWF system provides the method to electronically process payment requests and receiving reports. ( 1 ) Documents necessary for payment, such as receiving reports, invoice approvals, contracts, contract modifications, and required certifications, shall also be processed in electronic form.
( 2 ) Scanned documents and other commonly used file formats are only acceptable for processing supporting documentation.
( b ) If one of the exceptions to submission in electronic form at 232.7002(a) applies, the contracting officer shall— ( 1 ) Consult the payment office and the contract administration office regarding the alternative method to be used for submission of payment requests or receiving reports (*e.g.,* facsimile or conventional mail); and
( 2 ) Provide procedures for invoicing in the contract administration data section of the contract or task or delivery order (*e.g.,* section G, an addendum to FAR 52.212-4, or applicable clause) for submission of invoices by nonelectronic means. If submission of invoices by nonelectronic means is temporary, the procedures should specify the time period for which they apply.
[83 FR 66063, Dec. 21, 2018]