alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
© 2015 Trimble Navigation Limited. All rights reserved. This product is protected by US and international copyright, trademark, and patent law as described in 

"Legal Notices" in the product documentation. Revision B (May 2015). 

UX-D00116-01 P/N UX-D00116-01

www.trimble.com

Trimble ux5 aerial imaging rover

instruction card

Before you use the Trimble® UX5 aerial imaging rover, make sure that the payload bay is compatible with 

the sensor. This instruction card explains how to adapt the payload bay of the UX5 body for a Sony NEX-5 

and a Sony a5100 camera. By default, the UX5 body is tooled for the Sony a5100 camera.

Notes:

– These instructions apply only to UX5 bodies that have a serial number greater than S/N UX501218.

– You can order the UX5 Camera Compatibility Kit (P/N UX-G00191-01) from your Trimble distributor. 

Using a Sony a5100 camera

Note – Make sure that the Sony NEX-5 adapter pieces and the IR LED 

trigger cable are removed from the payload bay. Do not use any sharp 

tools for this. 

1. Insert the adapter piece into the camera cavity of the payload bay of 

the UX5 body. 

2. Connect the USB cable to the camera and to the connector from the 

eBox. Insert the eBox connection vertically into the cavity. 

Using a Sony NEX-5 camera

Note – Make sure that the Sony a5100 adapter piece and the USB trigger cable are removed from the 

payload bay. Do not use any sharp tools for this. 

1. Insert the two adapter pieces into the camera cavity of the payload bay of the UX5 body. 

2. Insert the IR LED cable into the cable duct: 

a. Without using any sharp tools, position the LED vertically in the round opening and gently push 

the cable into the duct. 

b. Connect the IR LED cable connector to the connector from the eBox and insert the connection 

vertically into the cavity.

c. Cover the IR LED with the protection cap. The cap should be flush with the surface.

warning – Before adapting the payload bay of the UX5 aerial imaging rover, always make sure C that the UX5 battery is disconnected from the rover.

Body and Camera Compatibility

Sony a5100 compatible payload bay

IR LED cable, top view IR LED cable, profile view Sony NEX-5 compatible payload bay
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         253,524
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 310,166
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          253,524
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      56,642
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   310,166
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,890,823
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,832,277
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                58,546
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .38
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .38


</TABLE>
Individual student’s 

cost of attendance

Student Aid 

Index based on 

FAFSA and 

Institutional 

Methodology The sum of each 

grant subcategory appears 

here; campusbased FSEOG and 

TEACH Grants 

would appear here 

under

"Institutional 

Grants"

NET PRICE

Federal loan

amounts

you are eligible for

Aid awarded by 

school but 

earned through 

work

School contact 

details for more 

information and 

next steps

Space for institution 

to send custom

message

Student name/ 

identifier; date 

issued (right side)

NOTE: Institutions may contact Collegefinancingplan@ed.gov to indicate their commitment to use the College Financing Plan. Students, parents, and 

institutions may also direct questions about the College Financing Plan to that e-mail address. Visit the College Financing Plan’s page on the Office of 

Postsecondary Education’s Web page for resources and background about the development and adoption of the College Financing Plan: 

http://www2.ed.gov/policy/highered/guid/aid-offer/index.html.

ANNOTATED

College Financing Plan Questions? Collegefinancingplan@ed.gov
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 5.0.3

Eastern Division

Dennis Adkins

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:12−cv−02871

Honorable Robert W. Gettleman

Nestle Purina Petcare Company, et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Monday, May 7, 2012:

 MINUTE entry before Honorable Robert W. Gettleman: Defendant Nestle Purina's

motion [19] for extension of time to 6/12/2012 to answer or otherwise plead is granted.

Defendant Walmart's motion [25] for extension of time to 6/12/2012 to answer or

otherwise plead is granted. Mailed notice (gds)

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:12-cv-02871 Document #: 28 Filed: 05/07/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:288
#### Crouse-Hinds Company, Respondent, v Charlie L. Jones et al., Defendants, Insurance Company of North America, Appellant, and Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Company/Kemper Insurance Group, Respondent.

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: In affirming, we point out that the exclusions contained in the plaintiffs general liability insurance policy with appellant did not relieve appellant from its contractual duty to defend plaintiff in the third-party action against it or respond if plaintiff becomes liable for damages (see *Graphic Arts Mut. Ins. Co. v Bakers Mut. Ins. Co. of N. Y.,*45 NY2d 551). That being so, whether appellant’s disclaimer was untimely or not is irrelevant. The contract obligated appellant to represent plaintiff in the third-party action and answer for damages assessed against plaintiff to the limits of the policy. It could not legally disclaim that contract responsibility. (Appeal from judgment of Onondaga Supreme Court-declaratory judgment.) Present-Moule, J. P., Cardamone, Simons and Dillon, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> OPUR1
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF CASCADE NATURAL GAS CORPORATION,
INCLUDED IN THE QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1996, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      253,553
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                      2,390
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                          44,323
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                        13,237
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 313,503
<COMMON>                                        10,824
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                       93,972
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                              8,621
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 113,417
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            6,630
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           101,550
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                               1,250
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                   4,944
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                        0
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                  85,712
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  313,503
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                       64,971
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                             3,597
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      52,596
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      52,596
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                         12,375
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                  22
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                  12,397
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         2,352
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,448
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        128
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                    6,320
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                         2,600
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                            0
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         (2,714)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.59
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.59
        

</TABLE>
#### 225.7601 Restriction.

In accordance with 10 U.S.C. 4659, do not enter into a contract with a foreign entity unless it has certified that it does not comply with the secondary Arab boycott of Israel.

[71 FR 39006, July 11, 2006, as amended at 87 FR 76994, Dec. 16, 2022]
#### Rusher Ford Sales, Inc., Respondent, v. Glens Falls Insurance Company, Appellant.

Order unanimously affirmed, with $25 costs and disbursements. (Appeal from order of Erie Special Term denying defendant’s motion to strike out of the amended complaint, as sham, so much as relates to a certain fire insurance policy.) Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Halpern, McClusky and Henry, JJ. [32 Misc 2d 468.]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  383,435
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    891,011
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,282,168
<PP&E>                                         684,224
<DEPRECIATION>                                 389,382
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,195,082
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,011,011
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        61,626
<OTHER-SE>                                 (2,151,554)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,195,082
<SALES>                                      2,901,454
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,901,454
<CGS>                                        2,329,299
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,329,299
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             5,374,308
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             392,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (5,357,968)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (5,357,968)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.95)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 99.1



New Century Companies, Inc.



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of New Century Companies, Inc. (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:



The Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2002 of the Company fully complies, in all material respects, with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and information contained in the Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to New Century Companies, Inc. and will be retained by New Century Companies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|April 14, 2003 |  | /s/    DAVID
DUQUETTE
|-------------- |  | ---------------------
|               |  | Name:                
|               |  | Title:
#### 206.303 Justifications.
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 876 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to recognize Indian tribal 

governments for purposes of determining under the adoption credit 

whether a child has special needs. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 6 (legislative day, APRIL 4), 2017 

Ms. HEITKAMP (for herself, Mr. INHOFE, Mr. HELLER, Mr. SCHATZ, Mr. 

HOEVEN, Ms. KLOBUCHAR, and Mr. UDALL) introduced the following 

bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to recognize 

Indian tribal governments for purposes of determining 

under the adoption credit whether a child has special 

needs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Tribal Adoption Parity 

5 Act’’. 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 876 IS

1 SEC. 2. RECOGNIZING INDIAN TRIBAL GOVERNMENTS FOR 

2 PURPOSES OF DETERMINING UNDER THE 

3 ADOPTION CREDIT WHETHER A CHILD HAS 

4 SPECIAL NEEDS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (3) of section 23(d) of 

6 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended— 

7 (1) in subparagraph (A), by inserting ‘‘or In8 dian tribal government’’ after the words ‘‘a State’’, 

9 and 

10 (2) in subparagraph (B), by inserting ‘‘or In11 dian tribal government’’ after the words ‘‘such 

12 State’’. 

13 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

14 subsection (a) shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

15 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Disclaimer

### State Department of Education

Maine Department of Education23 State House StationAugusta, ME 04333-0023Phone: (207) 624-6600Fax: (207) 624-6601Website: http://www.maine.gov/doe/

### State Higher Education Agency

Finance Authority of MaineP.O. Box 9495 Community DriveAugusta, ME 04332-0949Phone: (800) 228-3734Website: http://www.famemaine.com/

### Special Education Agency

Office of Special ServicesMaine Department of Education23 State House StationAugusta, ME 04333-0023Phone: (207) 624-6608Website: http://www.maine.gov/education/speced/index.htm

### State Adult Education Agency

Adult Education State Department of Education 23 State House Station Augusta, ME 04333-0023Phone: (207) 624-6780Website: http://www.maine.gov/education/aded/dev/index.htm

Back to state map
Case: 1:12-cv-02527 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 04/05/12 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:13

Case: 1:12-cv-02527 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 04/05/12 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:14

Case: 1:12-cv-02527 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 04/05/12 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:15
Exhibit 10(b)
Consent of Independent Auditors




We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption  "Experts," and to the
use of our report  dated  January 24,  2000,  with  respect to the  consolidated
financial statements of Kansas City Life Insurance Company and to the use of our
report dated March 31, 2000 with respect to the  financial  statements of Kansas
City Life Variable  Annuity  Separate  Account,  included in the  Post-Effective
Amendment No. 6 to the  Registration  Statement under the Securities Act of 1933
(File  No.  33-89984)  on Form  N-4 and  Post-Effective  Amendment  No. 6 to the
Registration  Statement under the Investment  Company Act of 1940  (Registration
No. 811-8994) and the related Statement of Additional  Information  accompanying
the Prospectus of Century II Variable Annuity.


ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Kansas City, Missouri
April 27, 2000
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

EASTERN DIVISION 

BRANDI NEUBERG, ) 

) 

Plaintiff, ) 

) No. 1:12-cv-02659 

v. ) 

)

CENTRAL CREDIT SERVICES, INC. )

 ) 

Defendant. ) 

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT

NOW COMES Plaintiff, BRANDI NEUBERG (“Plaintiff”), by and through the 

undersigned counsel, and hereby informs the Court that a settlement of the present matter has 

been reached and all parties to the present matter are currently in the process of executing the 

aforementioned settlement agreement, which Plaintiff anticipates will be completed within the 

next 60 days. 

 Plaintiff therefore requests that this Honorable Court vacate all dates currently set on 

calendar, including the Status Conference on January 24, 2013 at 8:30 am. for the present matter. 

DATED: January 15, 2013 RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, 

KROHN & MOSS, LTD. 

By: /s/ Adam T. Hill 

 Adam T. Hill 

KROHN & MOSS, LTD. 

10 N. Dearborn St., 3rd Fl. 

Chicago, Illinois 60602 

Telephone: 312-578-9428 

Telefax: 866-802-0021 

ahill@consumerlawcenter.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT 1

Case: 1:12-cv-02659 Document #: 16 Filed: 01/15/13 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:32
 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on January 15, 2013, I electronically filed the foregoing Notice of 

Settlement with the Clerk of the Court by using the CM/ECF System. A copy of said Notice was 

electronically submitted to all parties by the Court’s CM/ECF system. 

By: /s/ Adam T. Hill______________________ 

Adam T. Hill 

KROHN & MOSS, LTD. 

10 N. Dearborn St., 3rd Fl. 

Chicago, Illinois 60602 

Telephone: 312-578-9428 

Telefax: 866-802-0021 

ahill@consumerlawcenter.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT 2

Case: 1:12-cv-02659 Document #: 16 Filed: 01/15/13 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:33
#### 1815.203-72 Risk management.

In all RFPs for supplies or services for which a technical proposal is required, proposal instructions shall require offerors to identify and discuss risk factors and issues throughout the proposal where they are relevant, and describe their approach to managing these risks.

[65 FR 70316, Nov. 22, 2000, as amended at 83 FR 28386, June 19, 2018]
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements Nos.
33-42214, 33-98160, 333-80857 and 333-80843 on Form S-8 and No. 333-10665 on
Form S-3 of AXCESS Inc. of our report dated April 10, 2002, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements of AXCESS, Inc. included in this Annual Report
(Form 10-KSB) for the year ended December 31, 2001.



                                        /s/ Ernst & Young LLP


Dallas, Texas
April 15, 2002
Case: 1:12-cv-03395 Document #: 41-4 Filed: 08/17/12 Page 1 of 25 PageID #:560
Case: 1:12-cv-03395 Document #: 41-4 Filed: 08/17/12 Page 2 of 25 PageID #:561
Case: 1:12-cv-03395 Document #: 41-4 Filed: 08/17/12 Page 3 of 25 PageID #:562
Case: 1:12-cv-03395 Document #: 41-4 Filed: 08/17/12 Page 4 of 25 PageID #:563
Case: 1:12-cv-03395 Document #: 41-4 Filed: 08/17/12 Page 5 of 25 PageID #:564
Case: 1:12-cv-03395 Document #: 41-4 Filed: 08/17/12 Page 6 of 25 PageID #:565
Case: 1:12-cv-03395 Document #: 41-4 Filed: 08/17/12 Page 7 of 25 PageID #:566
Case: 1:12-cv-03395 Document #: 41-4 Filed: 08/17/12 Page 8 of 25 PageID #:567
Case: 1:12-cv-03395 Document #: 41-4 Filed: 08/17/12 Page 9 of 25 PageID #:568
Case: 1:12-cv-03395 Document #: 41-4 Filed: 08/17/12 Page 10 of 25 PageID #:569
Case: 1:12-cv-03395 Document #: 41-4 Filed: 08/17/12 Page 11 of 25 PageID #:570
Case: 1:12-cv-03395 Document #: 41-4 Filed: 08/17/12 Page 12 of 25 PageID #:571
Case: 1:12-cv-03395 Document #: 41-4 Filed: 08/17/12 Page 13 of 25 PageID #:572
Case: 1:12-cv-03395 Document #: 41-4 Filed: 08/17/12 Page 14 of 25 PageID #:573
Case: 1:12-cv-03395 Document #: 41-4 Filed: 08/17/12 Page 15 of 25 PageID #:574
Case: 1:12-cv-03395 Document #: 41-4 Filed: 08/17/12 Page 16 of 25 PageID #:575
Case: 1:12-cv-03395 Document #: 41-4 Filed: 08/17/12 Page 17 of 25 PageID #:576
Case: 1:12-cv-03395 Document #: 41-4 Filed: 08/17/12 Page 18 of 25 PageID #:577
Case: 1:12-cv-03395 Document #: 41-4 Filed: 08/17/12 Page 19 of 25 PageID #:578
Case: 1:12-cv-03395 Document #: 41-4 Filed: 08/17/12 Page 20 of 25 PageID #:579
Case: 1:12-cv-03395 Document #: 41-4 Filed: 08/17/12 Page 21 of 25 PageID #:580
Case: 1:12-cv-03395 Document #: 41-4 Filed: 08/17/12 Page 22 of 25 PageID #:581
Case: 1:12-cv-03395 Document #: 41-4 Filed: 08/17/12 Page 23 of 25 PageID #:582
Case: 1:12-cv-03395 Document #: 41-4 Filed: 08/17/12 Page 24 of 25 PageID #:583
Case: 1:12-cv-03395 Document #: 41-4 Filed: 08/17/12 Page 25 of 25 PageID #:584
#### Joseph J. Murtha, by His Guardian ad Litem, Margaret Murtha, et al., Respondents, v. Union Hospital Association of the Bronx et al., Appellants, and James B. McGrath, Respondent.

Order, entered May 12, 1964, permitting defendant McGrath to serve a supplemental answer, including a cross claim based on an alleged right of common-law indemnity against defendant hospital, unanimously affirmed, with $30 costs and disbursements to defendant-respondent against defendants-appellants. (See *Braun*v. *City of New York,*17 A D 2d 264; 2 Weinstein-Korn-Miller, N. Y. Civ. Prac., pars. 1007.02, 1401.03.) Concur — Breitel, J. P., Valente, Stevens, Eager and Bastow, JJ.