alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-6497

PAUL BARTS, Petitioner - Appellant,

versus GENE JOHNSON, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (CA-05-80-7-JLK) Submitted: August 17, 2005 Decided: September 12, 2005 Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Paul Barts, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Paul Barts seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing as untimely his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a habeas corpus proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue for claims addressed by a district court absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. SeeMiller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Barts has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED
IIA 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 10 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United 

States Code, of the final rule submitted by the Secretary of the Interior 

relating to stream protection. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 30, 2017 

Mr. MCCONNELL (for himself, Mrs. CAPITO, Mr. MANCHIN, Ms. HEITKAMP, 

Mr. HOEVEN, Mr. PAUL, Mr. BARRASSO, Mr. INHOFE, Ms. MURKOWSKI, 

Mr. BLUNT, Mr. SULLIVAN, Mr. SHELBY, Mr. TILLIS, Mr. JOHNSON, 

Mr. TOOMEY, Mr. WICKER, Mr. RISCH, Mr. FLAKE, Mr. BOOZMAN, Mr. 

DAINES, Mr. CRAPO, Mr. MORAN, Mr. LANKFORD, Mr. YOUNG, Mr. COTTON, Mr. ROBERTS, Mr. ENZI, Mrs. ERNST, and Mr. CORNYN) introduced the following joint resolution; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of 

title 5, United States Code, of the final rule submitted 

by the Secretary of the Interior relating to stream protection. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That Congress disapproves the final rule submitted by the 

4 Secretary of the Interior relating to stream protection (81 


smartinez on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•SJ 10 IS 

1 Fed. Reg. 93066 (December 20, 2016)), and such rule 

2 shall have no force or effect. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
#### 1850.104-370 Subcontractor indemnification requests.

Subcontractors shall submit requests for indemnification to the prime contractor and through higher tier subcontractor(s), as applicable. If the prime contractor agrees an indemnity clause should be flowed down to the subcontractor, the prime contractor shall forward its written request for subcontractor indemnification to the cognizant contracting officer for approval in accordance with FAR 50.104-3. The prime contractor's request shall provide information responsive to 1850.104-3, FAR 50.104-3, and FAR 50.104-3(b)(1)(i), (ii), (iv), (v), and (vii). The agreed upon definition of the unusually hazardous risk to be incorporated into the subcontract shall be the same as that incorporated in the prime contract.
SERVED FEBRUARY 24, 2010 


U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 


OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC II ") ') .Jl 

IN THE MA ITER OF 

AVIATION SPECIAL TIES UNLIMITED 

FAA DOCKET NO. CP09NM0014 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

DMS No. FAA-2009-1041 

AMENDED PROCEDURAL ORDER 

Paragraph #2 ofthe Procedural Order is amended as follows: 

WHEREFORE, the parties be and are hereby ORDERED to adhere to the 

following procedural schedule: 

,.. On or before May 1, 2010, the parties shall conclude all discoveryincluding, 

but not limited to, depositions, document production, responses to production 

requests and/or interrogatories. ifthe parties cannot resolve a discovery dispute 

they shall submit the dispute to the undersigned for resolution In a timely 

manner ... J 

Attachment - Service List 

I The court does not anticipate scheduling this case prior to 1 May 2010. 
FAA Docket No. CP09NM0014 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COpy 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC~430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2WlOOOI 

ONE COpy 

Richard A. Johnson, Respondent's Counsel 

3815 Rickenbacker Street, Suite 208 

Boise, ID 83705 

TEL: 208-344~ 1384 

FAX: 208.:343-5121 

David F. Shayne, Complainant's Counsel 

Northwest Mountain Region, ANM-7 

Federal Aviation Administration 

1601 Lind Avenue, S.W. 

Renton, W A 98057 

TEL: 425-227-2165 

FAX: 425-227-1007 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.B. 

East Building Ground Floor, Room E12-320 

Washington,DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 

202-366-5121 Legal Assistant 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

1 Service was by U.S. MaiL For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: 

Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 

2W1000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC·430.
');
	document.write('

On March 4, 2014 President Obama released his Fiscal Year 2015 Budget. The following materials are available showing what this budget provides for the programs and activities of the Department of Education:

- Secretary Duncan announced that “All students should have the opportunity to achieve in high school and thrive in whatever career or college they pursue. We owe 100 percent of our students that chance.” Read the  2015 Budget press release.
- The FY 2015 Education Budget Summary and Background Information (PDF, 1M) provides program information and detailed budget tables.
- The FY 2015 Justifications of Appropriations Estimates to the Congress.
- **Cross-cutting issues in the FY 2015 Budget**. These documents highlight a number of issues where the Department makes investments across many different programs and activities including:
College Access, Affordability and Completion PDF [192K]

Equity and Opportunity: Ensuring All Students Have the Education Opportunities Needed to Succeed PDF [212K]

Skills for the New Economy PDF [169KB]

Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Education PDF [204K]

Strengthening the Commitment to Native American Communities PDF [202K]

Supporting English Learners PDF [197K]

Supporting Individuals with Disabilities PDF [92K]

Supporting Rural Education PDF [170K]

Teachers and Leaders PDF [112K]

Investing in Early Learning PDF [182K]
- College Access, Affordability and Completion PDF [192K]
- Equity and Opportunity: Ensuring All Students Have the Education Opportunities Needed to Succeed PDF [212K]
- Skills for the New Economy PDF [169KB]
- Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Education PDF [204K]
- Strengthening the Commitment to Native American Communities PDF [202K]
- Supporting English Learners PDF [197K]
- Supporting Individuals with Disabilities PDF [92K]
- Supporting Rural Education PDF [170K]
- Teachers and Leaders PDF [112K]
- Investing in Early Learning PDF [182K]

The President's FY 2015 Budget for the entire United States Government is available online.
Federal Register / Vol. 59, No. 47 / Thursday, March 10, 1994 / Notice 

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
#### Leon Foston v. Quincy Compressor Co. et al.

Motion for reargument denied. That branch of the motion requesting an enlargement of time is granted only insofar as to extend the appellant’s time to serve and file the record on appeal and appellant’s points to and including August 14, 1962, with notice of argument for the September 1962 Term of this court, said appeal to be argued or submitted when reached. Concur-—-Botein, P. J., Breitel, Valente, McNally and Eager, JJ.
#### 227.7009 Patent releases, license agreements, and assignments.

This section contains clauses for use in patent release and settlement agreements, license agreements, and assignments, executed by the Government, under which the Government acquires rights. Minor modifications of language (e.g., pluralization of “Secretary” or “Contracting Officer”) in multi-departmental agreements may be made if necessary.
227.673 Foreign license and technical assistance agreements between the Government and domestic concerns. ( a ) Contracts between the Government and a primary source to provide technical assistance or patent rights to a second source for the manufacture of supplies or performance of services shall, to the extent practicable, specify the rights in patents and data and any other rights to be supplied to the second source. Each contract shall provide, in connection with any separate agreement between the primary source and the second source for patent rights or technical assistance relating to the articles or services involved in the contract, that— ( 1 ) The primary source and his subcontractors shall not make, on account of any purchases by the Government or by others with funds derived through the Military Assistance Program or otherwise through the Government, any charge to the second source for royalties or amortization for patents or inventions in which the Government holds a royalty-free license; or data which the Government has the right to possess, use, and disclose to others; or any technical assistance provided to the second source for which the Government has paid under a contract between the Government and the primary source; and
( 2 ) The separate agreement between the primary and second source shall include a statement referring to the contract between the Government and the primary source, and shall conform to the requirements of the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (see 227.675-1).
( b ) The following factors, among others, shall be considered in negotiating the price to be paid the primary source under contracts within (a) of this section: ( 1 ) The actual cost of providing data, personnel, manufacturing aids, samples, spare parts, and the like;
( 2 ) The extent to which the Government has contributed to the development of the supplies or services, and to the methods of manufacture or performance, through past contracts for research and development or for manufacture of the supplies or performance of the services; and
( 3 ) The Government's patent rights and rights in data relating to the supplies or services and to the methods of manufacture or of performance.
USGS HomeContact USGSSearch USGS
U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2009-1001

Geological Interpretation of the Sea Floor Offshore of Edgartown, Massachusetts

Title | List of Figures | Conversion Factors | Abstract | Introduction | Setting | Methods | Bathymetry | Sidescan Sonar | Seismic Profiles | Sediments | Bottom Photography | Data Catalog | Summary | Acknowledgments | References Cited | Contacts

Figure 37. The dense stands of seaweed that grow on the flanks       and crest of the seaward extension of Middle Flats at station E17. Station       location is shown in figures 15 and 29. 

AccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPolicies and Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological SurveyURL: http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2009/1001/html/fig37.htmlPage Contact Information: GS Pubs Web ContactPage Last Modified: Thursday, 22-Apr-2010 15:08:54 EDT
216.405-2-70 Award fee reduction or denial for jeopardizing the health or safety of Government personnel. ( a ) *Definitions.* *Covered incident* and *serious bodily injury* *,* as used in this section, are defined in the clause at 252.216-7004, Award Fee Reduction or Denial for Jeopardizing the Health or Safety of Government Personnel.
( b ) The contracting officer shall include in the evaluation criteria of any award-fee plan, a review of contractor and subcontractor actions that jeopardized the health or safety of Government personnel, through gross negligence or reckless disregard for the safety of such personnel, as determined through— ( 1 ) Conviction in a criminal proceeding, or finding of fault and liability in a civil or administrative proceeding (in accordance with section 823 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Pub. L. 111-84)); or
( 2 ) If a contractor or a subcontractor at any tier is not subject to the jurisdiction of the U.S. courts, a final determination of contractor or subcontractor fault resulting from a DoD investigation (in accordance with section 834 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Pub. L. 111-383)).
( c ) In evaluating the contractor's performance under a contract that includes the clause at 252.216-7004, Award Fee Reduction or Denial for Jeopardizing the Health or Safety of Government Personnel, the contracting officer shall consider reducing or denying award fees for a period if contractor or subcontractor actions cause serious bodily injury or death of civilian or military Government personnel during such period. The contracting officer's evaluation also shall consider recovering all or part of award fees previously paid for such period.
[75 FR 69361, Nov. 12, 2010. Redesignated at 76 FR 52135, Aug. 19, 2011]
#### 22.610 Contract clause.

The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 52.222-20, Contracts for Materials, Supplies, Articles, and Equipment, in solicitations and contracts covered by the statute (see 22.603, 22.604, and 22.605).

[79 FR 24205, Apr. 29, 2014, as amended at 85 FR 27091, May 6, 2020]
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Metropolitan Telecommunications Holding 

Company, Appellant

No. 06-19-00016-CV v.

Glenn Hegar, Comptroller of Public 

Accounts of the State of Texas, and Ken 

Paxton, Attorney General of the State of 

Texas, Appellees

Appeal from the 250th District Court of 

Travis County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. D-1-GN17-005706). Memorandum Opinion 

delivered by Justice Stevens, Chief Justice 

Morriss and Justice Burgess participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We further order that the appellant, Metropolitan Telecommunications Holding 

Company, pay all costs of this appeal.

RENDERED AUGUST 21, 2019

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
EXHIBIT 32.2
CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

I, Kevin J. Reinhart,  Executive Vice President and Chief  Financial  Officer of
Nexen Inc.,  a Canadian  Corporation  (the  "Company")  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

(1)  the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly  period
     ended  September  30,  2010 as  filed  with  the  Securities  and  Exchange
     Commission  on the date  hereof  (the  "Report")  fully  complies  with the
     requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of
     1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)  the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: November 3, 2010

                                                /s/ Kevin J. Reinhart
                                                ---------------------
                                                Kevin J. Reinhart
                                                Executive Vice President
                                                and Chief Financial Officer

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to Nexen Inc. and shall be retained by Nexen Inc. and  furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



                                       61
Exhibit
      32(b)








**CERTIFICATION
      FURNISHED PURSUANT TO**




**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**




**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**




**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report
      on Form 10-Q of Progress Energy, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ending
      September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
      the
      date hereof (the “Report”), I, Peter M. Scott III, Executive Vice President and
      Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
      1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:




(1)           the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
      applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)           the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.











/s/
      Peter M. Scott III


Peter
      M.
      Scott III


Executive
      Vice President and


Chief
      Financial Officer


November
      5, 2007








This
      certification is being furnished and shall not be deemed filed by the Company
      for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
      or incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Exchange Act
      of
      1934, as amended, or the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
225.7703-1 Acquisition procedures. ( a ) Subject to the requirements of 225.7703-2, except as provided in 225.7702, a product or service (including construction)in support of operations in Afghanistan may be acquired by— ( 1 ) Providing a preference for products or services from Afghanistan in accordance with the evaluation procedures at 225.7703-3;
( 2 ) Limiting competition to products or services from Afghanistan; or
( 3 ) Using procedures other than competitive procedures to award a contract to a particular source or sources from Afghanistan. When other than competitive procedures are used, the contracting officer shall document the contract file with the rationale for selecting the particular source(s).
( b ) For acquisitions conducted using a procedure specified in paragraph (a) of this subsection, the justification and approval addressed in FAR Subpart 6.3 is not required.
( c ) When issuing solicitations and contracts for performance in Afghanistan, follow the procedures at PGI 225.7703-1(c).
[73 FR 53153, Sept. 15, 2008, as amended at 78 FR 59858, Sept. 30, 2013; 79 FR 58695, Sept. 30, 2014]
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 17 (Thursday, January 28, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 7416]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-01894]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--ODVA, Inc.

    Notice is hereby given that, on January 14, 2021, pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), ODVA, Inc. (``ODVA'') has 
filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General 
and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. 
The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's 
provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual 
damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, KOFLOC Corp., 
Kyoto, JAPAN; Carlo Gavazzi Ltd., Zejtun, MALTA; Acuity Brands, Inc., 
Conyers, GA; BBH Products GmbH, Weiden, GERMANY; Thermo Gamma-Metrics 
LLC, San Diego, CA; IDEM Safety Switches Ltd., Wigan, UNITED KINGDOM; 
Rexnord Industries, LLC, Milwaukee, WI; Caterpillar, Inc., Deerfield, 
IL; and AQ M-TECH AB, Uppsala, SWEDEN, have been added as parties to 
this venture.
    Also, SAMWON ACT Co., Ltd., Busan, SOUTH KOREA; and The Controls 
Group, Inc. dba Logix, Kirkland, WA, have withdrawn as parties to this 
venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and ODVA intends to file additional 
written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.
    On June 21, 1995, ODVA filed its original notification pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice 
in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on February 
15, 1996 (61 FR 6039).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on September 
17, 2020. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
Section 6(b) of the Act on October 15, 2020 (85 FR 65424).

Suzanne Morris,
Chief, Premerger and Division Statistics Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2021-01894 Filed 1-27-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
#### 1852.219-76 [Reserved]
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF


DOLE FOOD COMPANY, INC.


10-Q 10-Q)




| |                                                                                                                                                                                  
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (i) the
    Form 10-Q fully
    complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
    Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
    (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and
|
| | (ii) the information contained in the
    Form 10-Q fairly
    presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
    results of operations of the Issuer.          



| |                                     
| | ------------------------------------
| | /s/ David H. Murdock                
| |                                     
| | David H. Murdock                    
| | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.1

** **

** **

**Certification of CEO andCFO**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350,**

**AsAdopted Pursuant to**

**Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

 

 

In connection with theAnnual Report on Form 10-K of National Property Investors 4 (the "Partnership"),for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Steven D. Cordes, as theequivalent of the Chief Executive Officer of the Partnership, and Stephen B.Waters, as the equivalent of the Chief Financial Officer of the Partnership,each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of hisknowledge:

 

(1)   The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)   Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

 

 

 

 

This certification isfurnished with this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Partnership for purposes of Section 18of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended.