alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Communications Commission

          - 47 CFR Part 64
          - [CG Docket No. 17-59, FCC 18-177; FRS 17376]

# AGENCY:

Federal Communications Commission.

# ACTION:

Final rule; announcement of compliance date.

# SUMMARY:

                        In this document, the Commission announces that compliance with the rule for reporting information about the most recent date of permanent                               ( print page 8559)                            disconnection to the Reassigned Numbers Database per the                         *2018 Second Report and Order,*                         published on March 26, 2019, is now required.                    

# DATES:

Compliance with 47 CFR 64.1200(l)(2), published at 84 FR 11226, March 26, 2019, is required as of March 10, 2021.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Karen Schroeder of the Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau, Consumer Policy Division, at (202) 418-0654 or                         *Karen.Schroeder@fcc.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

This document announces that OMB approved the information collection requirement in § 64.1200(l)(2) on June 2, 2020.

The Commission publishes this document as an announcement of the compliance date of the rule.

The Commission previously announced that compliance with the rules for aging numbers and maintaining records of the most recent date of permanent disconnection was required as of July 27, 2020, published at 85 FR 38334, June 26, 2020.

                    To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files, audio format), send an email to                     *fcc504@fcc.gov*                     or call the Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202) 418-0530 (voice).                

Federal Communications Commission.

Marlene Dortch,

Secretary, Office of the Secretary.

              Editorial Note            

#### Editorial Note:

 This document was received for publication by the Office of the Federal Register on January 14, 2021.

[FR Doc. 2021-01299 Filed 2-5-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1150 

Expressing support for the designation of April 16, 2024, as ‘‘FairTax Day’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 16, 2024 

Mr. CARTER of Georgia (for himself and Mr. CLYDE) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Accountability 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for the designation of April 16, 2024, 

as ‘‘FairTax Day’’. 

Whereas the current United States tax code is over 7,000 

pages; 

Whereas Americans will spend over 6,000,000,000 hours 

working on filing their taxes this year; 

Whereas the FairTax would repeal the current tax code and 

replace it with a single national consumption tax that is 

progrowth and allows Americans to keep every cent of 

their hard-earned money; 

Whereas the FairTax allows Americans to keep 100 percent 

of their hard-earned paycheck and ends the Internal Revenue Service headache; 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1150 IH 

Whereas a family of four could spend $30,000 annually without paying a penny in taxes; 

Whereas, in addition to eliminating all personal and corporate 

income taxes, the death tax, gift taxes, and the payroll 

tax, the FairTax would also eliminate the need for the 

Internal Revenue Service; and 

Whereas the FairTax is the only tax system that is simple, 

efficient, friendly to economic growth, nondiscriminatory, 

unintrusive, and FAIR: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives supports 

2 the designation of ‘‘FairTax Day’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
|  |
|--|

Joanna K. Darcus has served as Senior Counsel in the Office of the General Counsel since February 2021.  She previously worked at the National Consumer Law Center where she focused on consumer financial protection litigation and higher education policy issues facing low-income people and communities of color.  Prior to that, Joanna was a supervising attorney at Community Legal Services, Inc. of Philadelphia where she represented hundreds of low-income consumers sued by debt collectors or struggling with student loans.  Before law school, she was a case manager/paralegal at Juvenile Law Center.

She is a graduate of Duke University School of Law and Williams College.
|   | (1) | The      accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter      ended August 28, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of Section      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;  and |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the accompanying Report fairly presents, in all      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of      the Company. |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/  Fred R. Adams,  Jr.                          |
|--------------------------------------------------------|
| Fred      R. Adams, Jr.                                |
| Chairman      of the Board and Chief Executive Officer |
|                                                   |
| /s/  Timothy A.      Dawson                  |
| Timothy      A. Dawson                                 |
| Vice      President, Chief FinancialOfficer            |

----
#### 1803.7001 Contract clause.

Contracting officers must insert the clause at 1852.203-70, Display of Inspector General Hotline Posters, in solicitations and contracts expected to exceed $5,000,000 and performed at contractor facilities in the United States.

[66 FR 29727, June 1, 2001]
Protecting StudentsRace and National Origin DiscriminationIssues

*Bullying and harassment are harmful to students and the learning environment and are too pervasive in our nation’s schools. OCR works to protect the right of all students to learn in environments free from discriminatory bullying and harassment.*

----

 

              - Policy Guidance
              - Case Resolutions
              - Publications

### Policy Guidance
Presiding Magistrate Judge Sidney I. Schenki

Dated:Monday, June 04, 2012

United States District Court

Northern District of Illinois

In the Matter of

Ventas Realty, Limited Partnership

v. Case No. 12-CV-3107

ALC CVMA, LLC, et al

TRANSFER OF CASE TO THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE FOR A

REFERRAL TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE

 The above captioned case is currently pending on my calendar. I recommend to the Executive

Committee that this case be referred to the calendar of Magistrate Judge Sidney I. Schenkier, the

magistrate judge designated pursuant to Local Rule 72.1. The reasons for my recommendation

are indicated on the reverse of this form.

________________________________

Date: Monday, June 04, 2012

Judge Ronald A. Guzman

ORDER OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE

 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above captioned case be referred to the calendar of

Magistrate Judge Sidney I. Schenkier

ENTER

FOR THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE

_____________________________________

Chief Judge James F. Holderman

District Referral - To Designated Magistrate Judge

Case: 1:12-cv-03107 Document #: 43 Filed: 06/04/12 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:1323
- All Discovery Motions

EXCEPTIONS OR ADDITIONS:

All discovery motions are referred to Magistrate Judge Schenkier without authority to change discovery

cutoff date.

CIVIL PROCEDURES

Conduct hearings and enter appropriate orders on the following pretrial motion/matter:

District Referral - To Designated Magistrate Judge

Case: 1:12-cv-03107 Document #: 43 Filed: 06/04/12 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:1324
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT JOSUE M AR IN-M OLINA, a .k.a . Joshue M arin M olina , Pe titione r, v. ER IC H. HOLDER , Jr., Attorne y Ge ne ra l, R

e sponde nt . No. 12-72617 Age n c y No. A078-085-700 M EM O R ANDUM *

On Pe tition for Re vie w of a n Orde r of the B oa rd of Im m igration Appe a ls Subm itte d

June 25, 2014 ** B e fore : HAW K INS, TALLM AN, a nd NGUYEN, C i rc u it Judge s. Josue M arin-M olina , a native an d c i tiz e n of M e xic o, pe titions for re v ie w of the B oa rd of Im m igration Appe a ls’ orde r dism issing his a ppe a l from

an im m igration judge ’ s de c i sion de ny i ng his a pplic at ion for de fe rra l of re m ova l unde r



# FIL ED JUN 30 2014 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S . CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).the C onve ntion Against Torture(“ C AT” ). W e have jurisdic tion unde r 8 U.S.C .

§ 1252. W e re vie wfor substa ntia l e vide n c e the a ge nc y ’ s fa c tua l findings, Singh v . Gonzale

s , 439 F.3d 1100, 1113 (9th C i r. 2006), a nd we de ny

the pe tition for re vie w. M arin-M olina

doe s not c la im

he wa s torture d in thepa s t, but fe a rs torture in M e x ic o prim arily

due his gra

ndfathe r’ s a

nti-drug a c t ivitie s a s m

unic ipa l pre side nt ove r 20 y e ars a go, a

nd be c a use he ha s ta

ttoos. Substa

ntia l e v ide nc e supports the a ge nc y ’ s de nia l of M a

rin-M olina ’ s C AT c l a im

be c a use he fa ile d to e sta

blish it is m ore like ly

tha n not he would betorture d if re t urne d to M e xic o. Se e Zhe ng v . Holde r , 644 F.3d 829, 835-36 (9th C ir. 2011) (c onc luding there c ord did not c om pe l re ve rsa l of the a ge nc y ’ s de n ia l of C AT whe re the pe titione r’ s c la im s of possible torture re m a i ne d spe c u lative ). W e re je c t M arin-M olina ’ s c o nte ntions tha t the a ge nc y ignore d

e v ide nc e , se e Almaghzar v . Gonzale s , 457 F.3d 915, 922 (9th C ir. 2006), or otherwise e rre d in a na ly z ing his c l a im . PE T IT IO N FO R RE V IE WDE NIE D.

1 2 - 7 2 6 1 7 2
#### In the Matter of Radislaw Blazic, Appellant, v. Edward M. Fay, as Warden of Green Haven State Prison, Respondent.

In a proceeding pursuant to statute (former Civ. Prac. Act, art. 78; Correction Law, § 610), to compel the respondent, the prison warden, to permit the petitioner to receive certain religious material forwarded to him, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, entered December 17, 1963 after a hearing, which dismissed his petition. Judgment reversed on the law and the facts, without costs, and proceeding remitted to the Special Term for a further hearing and a determination *cle noro*of the issues herein, not inconsistent herewith. At the hearing on the petition it appeared that for a time the religious material in question had been delivered to petitioner, but that thereafter it was withheld by *the*respondent Warden. The Justice below inquired as to whether petitioner would consent to have the Warden examine the material in order to ascertain whether it was violative of the rules and regulations concerning the discipline and management of the institution, as promulgated by the Commissioner of Correction pursuant to the Correction Law (§§ 112, 610). The petitioner gave such consent; and the Warden agreed to deliver the material to petitioner should he (the Warden) find it not violative of such rules. The petition was thereupon dismissed. The record before us, however, is silent as to the findings of the Warden’s examination or as to the specific rules upon which the Warden relied in withholding the religious matter from petitioner. Absent this information, we are unable to pass upon the issues here presented. Accordingly, we must reverse the judgment and remit the proceeding to Special Term for a further hearing and for a determination *de novo*not inconsistent herewith. Such determination should be based: (a) upon the Warden’s findings as a result of his examination of the religious material in question; and (b) upon the said rules of the Commissioner of Correction, and more specifically upon the rules on which the Warden relies for his findings and for his action. In our opinion, petitioner should not be deprived of his right to receive *818religious material unless such material is found to be violative of reasonable rules and regulations concerning proper discipline and management of the prison, promulgated by the Commissioner of Correction pursuant to law (Correction Law, §§ 112, 610; *Martin*v. *Struthers,*319 U. S. 141, 143, 146-147; *Matter of Brown*v. *McGinnis,*10 N Y 2d 531; cf. *Matter of Holliday*v. *McGinnis,*18 A D 2d 828). Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Brennan and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
- Now That You Have a FIPSE Grant 2010:  MS Word (269K) | PDF (885K)
- Advice to New FIPSE Project Directors
- National Award Programs - Links to Application Information: MS Excel (42K) | PDF (23K)

FIPSE Home
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

EASTERN DIVISION 

ERRIOR HAYDEN and THOMAS 

PLEASANT, individually and on 

behalf of all others similarly situated, 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

FRESH EXPRESS INCORPORATED, 

Defendant. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

No. 1: 12-cv-1583 

Judge John Z. Lee 

Magistrate Judge Nan Nolan 

PLAINTIFFS' UNCONTESTED MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL 

OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT; CONDITIONAL CERTIFICATION OF A 

SETTLEMENT CLASS; DESIGNATION OF CLASS REPRESENTATIVES 

AND APPOINTMENT OF CLASS COUNSEL; APPROVAL OF THE FORM 

AND MANNER OF CLASS SETTLEMENT NOTICE; AND SCHEDULING A 

FINAL FAIRNESS HEARING 

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23, Plaintiffs asks the Court to 

enter an order: 

1. Preliminarily approving the class-wide Settlement Agreement 

negotiated by the parties; 

2. Conditionally certifying this case as a class action for settlement 

purposes only and defining the Class as: "employees or job applicants who applied 

to work for or worked for Fresh Express or Chiquita Brands International, Inc. 

locations during the time frame of March 5, 2010 to March 15, 2012 and who are 

identified in the Class List attached as Exhibit B. These individuals worked for or 

applied to work for Fresh Express or Chiquita Brands International, Inc. during the 

Case: 1:12-cv-01583 Document #: 34 Filed: 09/05/12 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:95
Covered Period and may have suffered an adverse action based upon information 

obtained in a consumer report."; 

3. Designating the Named Plaintiffs, Errior Hayden and Thomas 

Pleasant, as a representative for the Class and his attorneys as Class Counsel; 

4. Approving the form and manner of class notice; 

5. Setting a date for a final fairness hearing; and 

6. Pending the outcome of a final fairness hearing, preliminarily 

enjoining all members of the Class from commencing, prosecuting, or maintaining 

any claim already asserted in and encompassed by this Action, or challenging or 

seeking review of or relief from any order, judgment, act decision or ruling of this 

Court in connection with the Settlement Agreement. 

7. A draft order is attached to the memorandum of law filed in support of 

this motion. 

WHEREFORE, the Plaintiffs requests entry of the attached draft order or a 

similar order. 

Matthew J. Piers 

Christopher J. Wilmes 

Hughes Socol Piers Resnick & Dym 

70 W. Madison St. Suite 4000 

Chicago, IL 60602 

(312) 580-0100 

Respectfully submitted, 

Is/ Christopher J. Wilmes 

Case: 1:12-cv-01583 Document #: 34 Filed: 09/05/12 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:96
|  |
|--|

 Jennifer Rodriguez has served as the Confidential Assistant in the Office of the General Counsel since May 2022. She previously worked as a Legislative Fellow at Pay Our Interns, where she advocated for paid internships in Congress, the White House, and federal agencies, and a Legislative Intern at the U.S. House of Representatives. Prior to that, Jennifer worked as a Digital Communities Manager for the Florida Democratic Party.

 She graduated from the University of Florida and is a current graduate student at the George Washington University.
211.204 Solicitation provisions and contract clauses. ( c ) When contract performance requires use of specifications, standards, and data item descriptions that are not listed in the Acquisition Streamlining and Standardization Information System database, use a provision, as appropriate, substantially the same as 252.211-7002, Availability for Examination of Specifications, Standards, Plans, Drawings, Data Item Descriptions, and Other Pertinent Documents.
[84 FR 25193, May 31, 2019]
1519.503 Class set-aside for construction. ( a ) Each proposed acquisition for construction estimated to cost between $10,000 and $1,000,000 shall be set-aside for exclusive small business participation. Such set-asides shall be considered to be unilateral small business set-asides, and shall be withdrawn in accordance with the procedure of FAR 19.506 only if found not to serve the best interest of the Government.
( b ) Small business set-aside preferences for construction acquisitions in excess of $1,000,000 shall be considered on a case-by-case basis.
#### Rachael Parisi et al., Appellants, v. Incorporated Village of Valley Stream, Respondent.

Motion by appellants for leave to prosecute the appeal on the original papers. Motion denied. The papers submitted in support of this motion are entirely insufficient to demonstrate that there is any merit in the appeal, or to justify the making of an order pursuant to section 198-a of the Civil Practice Act. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Kleinfeld, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 54 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. CON. RES. 54

 Authorizing the printing of the 26th edition of the pocket version of 
                 the Constitution of the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 29, 2018

   Mr. Blunt (for himself and Ms. Klobuchar) submitted the following 
       concurrent resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
 Authorizing the printing of the 26th edition of the pocket version of 
                 the Constitution of the United States.

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring),

SECTION 1. POCKET VERSION OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES.

    (a) In General.--The 26th edition of the pocket version of the 
Constitution of the United States shall be printed as a Senate document 
under the direction of the Joint Committee on Printing.
    (b) Additional Copies.--In addition to the usual number, there 
shall be printed the lesser of--
            (1) 480,500 copies of the document, of which 255,500 copies 
        shall be for the use of the House of Representatives, 200,000 
        copies shall be for the use of the Senate, and 25,000 copies 
        shall be for the use of the Joint Committee on Printing; or
            (2) such number of copies of the document as does not 
        exceed a total production and printing cost of $226,250, with 
        distribution to be allocated in the same proportion as 
        described in paragraph (1), except that in no case shall the 
        number of copies be less than 1 per Member of Congress.
    (c) Distribution.--The copies of the document printed for the use 
of the House of Representatives and the Senate under subsection (a) 
shall be distributed in accordance with--
            (1) a distribution plan approved by the chair and ranking 
        minority member of the Committee on House Administration of the 
        House of Representatives, in the case of the copies printed for 
        the use of the House of Representatives; and
            (2) a distribution plan approved by the chair and ranking 
        minority member of the Committee on Rules and Administration of 
        the Senate, in the case of the copies printed for the use of 
        the Senate.
                                 <all>
```
#### In the Matter of Adele Munter, Appellant, v. John J. Theobald, as Superintendent of Schools of the City of New York, et al., Respondents.

Motion by appellant for a stay, pending appeal, granted, on condition that appellant perfect the appeal and be ready to argue or submit it at the October Term, beginning October 1, 1962. Motion by appellant to dispense with printing, granted. The appeal will be heard on a typewritten record and on appellant’s typewritten brief, which shall include a copy of the opinion, if any, of the court below. The appellant is directed to file two copies of the typewritten record and six copies of her typewritten brief and to serve one copy of each on respondents. The record and appellant’s brief must be served and filed on or before August 20, 1962. Kleinfeld, Acting P. J., Brennan, Hill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Cagles, Inc. for the period ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-Q), I, J. Douglas Cagle, Chief Executive Officer of Cagles, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:



1. The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, and



2. The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: November 9, 2006

By: /s/ J. Douglas Cagle

J. Douglas Cagle

Chief Executive Officer









1







CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Cagles, Inc. for the period ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-Q), I, Mark M. Ham IV, Chief Financial Officer of Cagles, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:



1. The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, and



2. The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: November 9, 2006

By: /s/ Mark M. Ham IV

Mark M. Ham IV

Chief Financial Officer











2