alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Order filed, November 22, 2019.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 19

- 00715

- CV

____________ BOOTH CREEK MANAGEME NT CORPORATION , Appellant

V.

NEW EXECUTIVE GROUP LIMITED, TRANSAMERIC A INVESTMENT

GROUP, INC., AND JOH N BERR Y , Appellee

On Appeal from the 165th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2016

- 24794



### ORDER
The reporter’s record in this case was due September 13, 2019

. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.1. On October 25, 2019
, Cynthia Martinez filed a mo tion for extension

o f time to file the reporter ’ s rec ord which was granted to November 4, 2019. The record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record has not been filed timely, we issue the following order.We order Cynthia Ma rtinez , the official court reporter, to file the record in

this appeal within 10 days of the date of this order

. No further extension will be entertained absent exceptional circumstances. The trial and appellate courts are jointly responsible for ensurin g that the appellate record is timely filed. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(c). If Cynthia Martinez does not timely file the record as ordered, we may issue an order directing the trial court to conduct a hearing to
determine the reason for the failure to file the record.

PER CURIAM
#### 237.7400 Scope.

This subpart prescribes procedures for contracting, through use of other than full and open competition, with local governments for police, fire protection, airfield operation, or other community services at military installations to be closed under the Defense Authorization Amendments and Base Closure and Realignment Act (Pub. L. 100-526), as amended, and the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990 (Pub. L. 101-510), as amended.

[59 FR 36089, July 15, 1994, as amended at 60 FR 29500, June 5, 1995]
#### 222.7004 Contract clause.

Use the clause at 252.222-7000, Restrictions on Employment of Personnel, in all solicitations and contracts subject to this subpart. Insert the name of the appropriate noncontiguous State in paragraph (a) of the clause.
<PAGE>

                                                                 EXHIBIT (10)(c)


                       CONSENT OF BARRY G. SKOLNICK, ESQ.


    I hereby consent to the reference to my name under the caption "Legal
Matters" in the prospectus included in Post-Effective Amendment No. 15 to the
Registration Statement on Form N-4 for certain variable annuity insurance
contracts issued through ML of New York Variable Annuity Separate Account A and
included in the prospectus included in Post-Effective Amendment No. 14 to the
Registration Statement on Form N-4 for certain variable annuity insurance
contracts issued through ML of New York Variable Annuity Separate Account B of
Merrill Lynch Life Insurance Company, File Nos. 33-43654 and 33-45380.


<TABLE>
<S>                             <C>  <C>
                                               /s/ BARRY G. SKOLNICK
                                     -----------------------------------------
                                                 Barry G. Skolnick
                                     SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT AND GENERAL COUNSEL
</TABLE>


April 24, 2000
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Wanda Lafaye LEE, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 08-10056

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

June 12, 2008.

*380Wanda Lafaye Lee, Fort Worth, TX, pro se.

Before JOLLY, SMITH, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Wanda Lee, federal prisoner #33841-177, appeals the denial of her 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) motion to modify her 85-month sentence imposed following her jury conviction of being a felon in possession of a firearm. The district court imposed sentence after enhancing Lee’s offense level based on a determination that she possessed the firearm in connection with another felony offense, possession of crack cocaine.

The decision to reduce a sentence “is left to the sound discretion of the trial court.” *United States v. Boe,*117 F.3d 830, 831 (5th Cir.1997). This court reviews the decision on a § 3582(c)(2) motion only for abuse of discretion. *Id.*

Lee bases her motion on the United States Sentencing Commission’s adoption of Amendment 706, which modified the sentencing ranges applicable to crack cocaine offenses to reduce the disparity between crack cocaine and powder cocaine sentences. She argues that, as a result of *United States v. Booker,*543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), and *Kimbrough v. United States,*— U.S. -, 128 S.Ct. 558, 169 L.Ed.2d 481 (2007), the district court had the discretion to reduce her sentence, taking into account the disparity in the treatment of powder cocaine and crack cocaine under the sentencing guidelines.

A district court is authorized under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(b) to modify a previously imposed sentence in a limited number of circumstances. *United States v. Bridges,*116 F.3d 1110, 1112 (5th Cir.1997). One such circumstance is provided by § 3582(c)(2), which “permits a district court to reduce a term of imprisonment when it is based on a sentencing range that has subsequently been lowered by an amendment to the Sentencing Guidelines, if such a reduction is consistent with the policy statements issued by the Sentencing Commission.” *Boe,*117 F.3d at 831.

*381As the district court correctly determined, Lee was convicted of a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) rather than of a crack cocaine offense. Her sentencing range was not “subsequently ... lowered” by Amendment 706, as required to permit her to obtain a modification of her sentence under § 3582(c)(2). *See Boe,*117 F.3d at 831; § 3582(c)(2).

To the extent that Lee contends that she is entitled to a modification pursuant to § 3582(c)(2) under *Booker*and *Kimbrough,*her argument is unavailing. Section 3582(c)(2) “only applies to retroactive guideline amendments.” *United States v. Shaw,*30 F.3d 26, 29 (5th Cir.1994).

Lee has failed to show that the district court abused its discretion in denying her § 3582(c)(2) motion. *See Boe,*117 F.3d at 831. Accordingly, the judgment is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE DECEMBER
31, 1995 ANNUAL REPORT TO SHAREHOLDERS OF U.S. HEALTHCARE, INC. AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                         804,631
<SECURITIES>                                   450,006
<RECEIVABLES>                                  149,082
<ALLOWANCES>                                    15,779
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,431,153
<PP&E>                                         236,217
<DEPRECIATION>                                  94,080
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,667,144
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          680,177
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           744
<OTHER-SE>                                     963,387
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,667,144
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,609,679
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,990,711
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                618,968
<INCOME-TAX>                                   238,303
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            380,665
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   380,665
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.42
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.42
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with the  Annual  Report on Form 10-KSB (the  "Report") of
Cambridge Holdings, Ltd. (the "Company") for the year ended June 30, 2003, each
of the undersigned Gregory Pusey, the President and Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, and Jeffrey G. McGonegal, the Senior Vice President-Finance and
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of the undersigned's knowledge and belief:

     (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated:  September 29, 2003       \s\ Gregory Pusey
                                 --------------------------------------------
                                 Gregory Pusey, President and
                                 Chief Executive Officer

Dated:  September 29, 2003       \s\ Jeffrey G. McGonegal
                                 --------------------------------------------
                                 Jeffrey G. McGonegal, Senior Vice President-
                                 Finance and Chief Financial Officer


                                    * * * * *


A signed original of the written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Publications

* All sediment samples were collected on 1 August 1994.
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 14 (Monday, January 25, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 6865]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-01534]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[B-59-2020]


Foreign-Trade Zone (FTZ) 26--Atlanta, Georgia; Authorization of 
Limited Production Activity; OFS Fitel, LLC (Optical Fiber Products), 
Carrollton, Georgia

    On September 21, 2020, OFS Fitel, LLC submitted a notification of 
proposed production activity to the FTZ Board for its facility within 
FTZ 26, in Carrollton, Georgia.
    The notification was processed in accordance with the regulations 
of the FTZ Board (15 CFR part 400), including notice in the Federal 
Register inviting public comment (85 FR 61719-619720, September 30, 
2020). On January 19, 2021, the applicant was notified of the FTZ 
Board's decision that further review of part of the proposed activity 
is warranted. The FTZ Board authorized the production activity 
described in the notification on a limited basis, subject to the FTZ 
Act and the Board's regulations, including Section 400.14, and further 
subject to restrictions requiring that foreign-status optical fiber and 
optical bundles be admitted to the zone in privileged foreign status 
(19 CFR 146.41) and that foreign-status standard waterblock and non-
waterblock aramid yarn be admitted to the zone in domestic/duty paid 
status (19 CFR 146.43).

    Dated: January 19, 2021.
Elizabeth Whiteman,
Acting Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-01534 Filed 1-22-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Uran Mining Corp. et al., Appellants.

Motion granted to prosecute appeals of all defendants on one typewritten record and five copies of typewritten brief; order of July 1, 1960 amended to provide that record and appellants’ briefs be filed on or before September 29, 1960. Respondent’s brief must be filed and served on or before October 6, 1960 if case is to be argued at October 1960 Term.
#### 225.771-4 Waiver of prohibition.

The prohibition in 225.771-2 may be waived if the Secretary of Defense determines that a waiver is not inconsistent with the national security objectives of the United States in accordance with 10 U.S.C. 4871(c).

[79 FR 73489, Dec. 11, 2014, as amended at 87 FR 76993, Dec. 16, 2022]
Case: 1:12-cv-01887 Document #: 14-3 Filed: 09/04/12 Page 1 of 28 PageID #:276
Case: 1:12-cv-01887 Document #: 14-3 Filed: 09/04/12 Page 2 of 28 PageID #:277
Case: 1:12-cv-01887 Document #: 14-3 Filed: 09/04/12 Page 3 of 28 PageID #:278
Case: 1:12-cv-01887 Document #: 14-3 Filed: 09/04/12 Page 4 of 28 PageID #:279
Case: 1:12-cv-01887 Document #: 14-3 Filed: 09/04/12 Page 5 of 28 PageID #:280
Case: 1:12-cv-01887 Document #: 14-3 Filed: 09/04/12 Page 6 of 28 PageID #:281
Case: 1:12-cv-01887 Document #: 14-3 Filed: 09/04/12 Page 7 of 28 PageID #:282
Case: 1:12-cv-01887 Document #: 14-3 Filed: 09/04/12 Page 8 of 28 PageID #:283
Case: 1:12-cv-01887 Document #: 14-3 Filed: 09/04/12 Page 9 of 28 PageID #:284
Case: 1:12-cv-01887 Document #: 14-3 Filed: 09/04/12 Page 10 of 28 PageID #:285
Case: 1:12-cv-01887 Document #: 14-3 Filed: 09/04/12 Page 11 of 28 PageID #:286
Case: 1:12-cv-01887 Document #: 14-3 Filed: 09/04/12 Page 12 of 28 PageID #:287
Case: 1:12-cv-01887 Document #: 14-3 Filed: 09/04/12 Page 13 of 28 PageID #:288
Case: 1:12-cv-01887 Document #: 14-3 Filed: 09/04/12 Page 14 of 28 PageID #:289
Case: 1:12-cv-01887 Document #: 14-3 Filed: 09/04/12 Page 15 of 28 PageID #:290
Case: 1:12-cv-01887 Document #: 14-3 Filed: 09/04/12 Page 16 of 28 PageID #:291
Case: 1:12-cv-01887 Document #: 14-3 Filed: 09/04/12 Page 17 of 28 PageID #:292
Case: 1:12-cv-01887 Document #: 14-3 Filed: 09/04/12 Page 18 of 28 PageID #:293
Case: 1:12-cv-01887 Document #: 14-3 Filed: 09/04/12 Page 19 of 28 PageID #:294
Case: 1:12-cv-01887 Document #: 14-3 Filed: 09/04/12 Page 20 of 28 PageID #:295
Case: 1:12-cv-01887 Document #: 14-3 Filed: 09/04/12 Page 21 of 28 PageID #:296
Case: 1:12-cv-01887 Document #: 14-3 Filed: 09/04/12 Page 22 of 28 PageID #:297
Case: 1:12-cv-01887 Document #: 14-3 Filed: 09/04/12 Page 23 of 28 PageID #:298
Case: 1:12-cv-01887 Document #: 14-3 Filed: 09/04/12 Page 24 of 28 PageID #:299
Case: 1:12-cv-01887 Document #: 14-3 Filed: 09/04/12 Page 25 of 28 PageID #:300
Case: 1:12-cv-01887 Document #: 14-3 Filed: 09/04/12 Page 26 of 28 PageID #:301
Case: 1:12-cv-01887 Document #: 14-3 Filed: 09/04/12 Page 27 of 28 PageID #:302
Case: 1:12-cv-01887 Document #: 14-3 Filed: 09/04/12 Page 28 of 28 PageID #:303
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION
                          302 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT



I, Robert A. Doak, certify that:

1. I have  reviewed  this  annual  report  on  Form  10-KSB  of  Mountains  West
Exploration, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of December 31, 2001; and

c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

<PAGE>

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
annual report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in
other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: September 23, 2004


/s/Robert A. Doak
-----------------------
Robert A. Doak, President
- P-12
- Carrera Universitaria
- Educación Para Adultos
- Derechos Civiles
- Educación Especial
- Noticias

----

Kit de Herramientas

Elevar Las Expectativas

Biden-Harris cancelación de deuda

Recursos Para Víctimas de Violencia

Manual COVID-19: Volumen 1Volumen 2

Comunicados de Prensa

Homeroom Blog (Blog del Aula)

Enfermedad del Coronavirus 2019 (COVID‐19) | CDC

Información acerca de Huracanes

La Ley Cada Estudiante Triunfa

Ayuda Federal para Estudiantes

Avisos para medios de comunicación

Gracias por su interés en la educación. En el Departamento de Educación creemos firmemente que todos los niños pueden aprender y que la educación es el camino más seguro hacia la realización de su sueño.

El Departamento de Educación tiene como misión promover el alto rendimiento académico y la preparación de los estudiantes para la competitividad global al fomentar la excelencia en la educación y garantizar la igualdad de acceso.

Cumpliremos con el deseo del presidente de apoyar la reapertura segura y sostenida de las escuelas

De Secretario Cardona: Una carta a padres y estudiantes

Localice su escuela

Localice su distrito escolar

Localice al departamento de educación de su estado

USAGov en Español es la guía oficial de información y servicios del Gobierno

Publicaciones

Centro de Recursos de InformaciónTeléfono 1-800-872-5327 o 202-401-2000Correo electrónico
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Julia Midgette, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County, rendered September 26, 1977, convicting her of grand larceny in the second degree and criminal impersonation, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Judgment reversed, on the facts, indictment dismissed and case remitted to the County Court, Westchester County, for the purpose of entering an order in its discretion pursuant to CPL 160.50. In our opinion, the guilt of defendant was not established beyond a reasonable doubt. Hopkins, J. P., Suozzi, Rabin and Shapiro, JJ., concur.
Case: 1:12-cv-03724 Document #: 1-3 Filed: 05/15/12 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:16
Case: 1:12-cv-03724 Document #: 1-3 Filed: 05/15/12 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:17
#### Patricia M. Ludeman, Respondent, v. Louis H. Ludeman, Appellant.

In an action for a judicial separation, defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated January 3, 1962, which denied without a hearing, his motion to modify an order of said court, dated December 1, 1961, adjudging him in contempt for failure to pay alimony. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Beldock, P. J., Kleinfeld, Brennan, Hill and Rabin, JJ., concur.
Exhibit
      32(f)








**CERTIFICATION
      FURNISHED PURSUANT TO**




**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**




**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**




**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report
      on Form 10-Q of Florida Power Corporation (the “Company”) for the period ending
      June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
      hereof (the “Report”), I, Peter M. Scott III, Executive Vice President and Chief
      Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:




(1)           the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
      applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)           the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.











/s/
      Peter M. Scott III


Peter
      M.
      Scott III


Executive
      Vice President and


Chief
      Financial Officer


August
      8,
      2007








This
      certification is being furnished and shall not be deemed filed by the Company
      for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
      or incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Exchange Act
      of
      1934, as amended, or the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
Exhibit 23.1
 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
  
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-47185) pertaining to the 1982 Employee Incentive Stock
Option Plan, the 1992 Stock Option Plan and the 1997 Directors Stock Option Plan;
    
    Registration Statements (Form S-8 No. 333-76767, Form S-8 No. 333-71878 and Form S-8 No.
333-130589) pertaining to the 1998 Employee Stock Purchase Plan;
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-74787) pertaining to the 1998 Stock Incentive Plan
(formerly the 1998 Cimaron Communications Corporation Stock Incentive Plan);
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-41572) pertaining to the YuniNetworks, Inc. 1999
Equity Incentive Plan;
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-48914) pertaining to the MMC Networks, Inc. 1993 Stock
Plan, the MMC Networks, Inc. 1997 Stock Plan, the MMC Networks, Inc. 1997 Director Option Plan and
the MMC Networks, Inc. 1997 Employee Stock Purchase Plan;
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-92507) pertaining to the 1992 Stock Option Plan;
    
    Registration Statements (Form S-8 No. 333-35408, Form S-8 No. 333-48912, Form S-8 No.
333-53282, and Form S-8 No. 333-99623) pertaining to the 2000 Equity Incentive Plan;
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-57202) pertaining to the Raleigh Technology Corp.
Equity Compensation Plan;
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-110075) pertaining to the JNI Corporation 2000
Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan, the JNI Corporation Amended and Restated 1999 Stock Option Plan,
the Jaycor Networks, Inc. 1997 Stock Option Plan, as amended, and the 1992 Stock Option Plan, as
amended;
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-114327) pertaining to the 3ware, Inc. 2002 Stock Plan,
as amended, and the 3ware, Inc. Amended and Restated 1997 Stock Option Plan;
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-140052) pertaining to the Quake Technologies, Inc.
Amended and Restated Stock Option Plan 2000 and
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-147297) pertaining to Amended and Restated 1992 Equity
Incentive Plan
#### 225.7005-225.7008 [Reserved]