alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Harutun Grigorian, as Guardian ad Litem of Anastasia Grigorian, an Infant, et al., Appellants, v. Constantine B. Paluszek, Respondent, et al., Defendants.

In an action to recover damages for breach of warranty, plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated April 15, 1964, which denied their motion, made pursuant to statute (CPLR 3124, 3126), to direct defendant Paluszek to make disclosure, or alternatively, to strike out his answer for failure to appear for the pretrial examination. Order reversed, without costs, and motion granted to the extent of directing the defendant Paluszek to appear for examination at a time and place to be fixed by plaintiffs on 10 days’ written notice or at such time and place as the parties may mutually fix by written stipulation. The basis for Special Term’s order denying plaintiffs’ motion to compel disclosure by defendant Paluszek was the fact that plaintiffs’ prior attorney had filed a note of issue and statement of readiness without having sought or conducted the pretrial examination of this defendant. It appears, however, that on another defendant’s motion the action had been struck from the Trial Calendar for nonreadiness. It follows therefore that the rights of the parties with respect to disclosure procedures have been restored and are now the same as though the abortive, premature note of issue and statement of readiness had never been filed. Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Brennan, JJ., concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health Special Emphasis Panel; NCCIH Training and Education Review Panel (CT).                    

*Date:*                         February 18th-19th, 2021.                    

*Time:*                         8:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         NCCIH/NIH, Democracy II, 6707 Democracy Blvd., Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Patrick Colby Still, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Office of Scientific Review, Division of Extramural Activities, NCCIH/NIH, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Suite 401, Bethesda, MD 20892-5475,                         *patrick.still@nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.213, Research and Training in Complementary and Alternative Medicine, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: January 21, 2021.

Ronald J. Livingston, Jr.,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2021-01710 Filed 1-26-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
## DoT-osr-

# U>

# ll w

## o1 

# oq

Regional· Economic Development Corporation PO Box 518 Rhinelander, WI 

### 54501 (715) 365 4468 grownorth@ nicoletcollege.edu www.grownorth.org

-**~;** '

Board of Diredors**2.012~2013** Officers: Jim Brown- President Phil Albert" Vice President Bart Lamers

- Past President

(Technology Representative) Libby Burmaster- Secretary

(Education Representative) Pete Otis·Treasurer·

(Finance Representative} · County Representatives: Jimmy Landru Jr.

Forest County Christine Berry

Langlade County Jack Sroka

Lincoln County Roger Luce

Oneida County Bob Egan

Vilas County Sector Representatives: Monica Hilt- Health Care Scott Sievert- Manufacturing Diane Hapka- Tourism Jim Hawkins- Tribal
At large Members: Julie Berndt Tim Hintz Larry l<ind Jim Schuessler Collette Sergei Executive Director: Joe Hegge



### Grow 

### North Exists to

create, sustain and promote an environment conducive to regional economic development and pros!)erity. August 6, 2012



### Mr. Dennis DeVany, Chief Essential Air Service Division U.S. Department ofTransportation Office ofAviation Analysis Essential Service Division 1200 NewJersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590

RE: Docket**OST-2011~0109** Rhinelander, Wisconsin

Dear 

### Mr. DeVany, I 

### co

<11

Grow North Regional Economic Development Corporation (Grow North} is very supportive of the proposal for essential airtransportation from SkyWest Airlines. We have reviewed the analysis provided by Joe Brauer, Rhinelander/Oneida CountyAirport Managerand Robert Heck, Airport Chair and agree that the SkyWest proposal provides the greatest benefit to the region.
Grow North exists to promote an improved and sustainable economy in the Northwoods of Wisconsin. Our region has a large number {47%) ofsecond homeowners from outside the area. In a recent survey these same people recognized flexible, reliable and.available commercial air travel as being of primary importanceto increased time spent attheir second homes. In addition, continued growth in our internationallycompetitive manufacturing firms such as Oldenburg Group, Superior Diesel, Wausau Paper, LaserPro, ABX, NEX, Red Arrow, Ponsse North America and Printpack:will be greatly influenced by reliable air service to majorairline hubs. Continuation and improvementofcommercial airtravel will serve as a tremendous economic stimulus to the Northwoods ofWisconsin.
With the acceptance ofthe SkyWest proposal, we feel that the area will be betterserved· into the future ensuring flexible, reliable and available commercial air travel. Thank you for yourthoughtful consideration ofour needs. Sincerely,

Joe 

### Hegge, Executive Director
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 13

- 00029

- CR

Horacio Fidencio BENAVIDEZ

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 218th Judicial District Court, Frio County, Texas

Trial Court No. 10

- 11

- 00132

- CRF

Honorable Stella Saxon, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE STONE

, JUSTICE ANGELINI , AND JUSTICE CHAPA

In accordance with this court’s memorandum opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgments are AFFIRMED. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED. The Frio Co unty District Clerk, Ramona B. Rodriguez, is ORDERED to delete the $2,000.00 in attorney’s fees from the bill of costs in this case, and to prepare and file a corrected bill of costs in this case.

SIGNED February 5, 2014.

_____________________________ Karen Angelini, Justice
#### 1348.201 Clauses for supply or service contracts.

The designee authorized to grant exemptions from the requirements of FAR Part 48 for a contract or class of contracts is set forth in CAM 1301.70.
Marcella Goodridge is the Assistant General Counsel for Ethics and has served in that position since January 2017.  She also serves as the Department’s Designated Agency Ethics Official.

Before joining the Ethics Division, Ms. Goodridge served as an employment litigation attorney within OGC’s Division of Business and Administrative Law.  She started her career with the Department in that role in October 2000.  Prior to joining OGC, Ms. Goodridge served as judicial law clerk for the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania focusing on administrative law matters at the state level.

Ms. Goodridge received a B.A. from the University of Pennsylvania, and received her law degree from Villanova University.
22.1303 Applicability. ( a ) The Act applies to all contracts and subcontracts for personal property and nonpersonal services (including construction) of $150,000 or more except as waived by the Secretary of Labor.
( b ) The requirements of the clause at 52.222-35, Equal Opportunity for Veterans, in any contract with a State or local government (or any agency, instrumentality, or subdivision) do not apply to any agency, instrumentality, or subdivision of that government that does not participate in work on or under the contract.
( c ) The Act requires submission of the VETS-4212 Report in all cases where the contractor or subcontractor has received an award of $150,000 or more, except for awards to State and local governments, and foreign organizations where the workers are recruited outside of the United States.
[66 FR 53488, Oct. 22, 2001, as amended at 71 FR 57368, Sept. 28, 2006; 75 FR 60251, Sept. 29, 2010; 80 FR 38298, July 2, 2015; 80 FR 75910, Dec. 4, 2015]
Case: 1:12-cr-00172 Document #: 5 Filed: 03/09/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:24
On  November 8, 2012, by letter, OCR closed a complaint against the Community College of Allegheny County (the “College”) that was filed  because of  initiatives it had that  sought to recruit African American applicants to the College by offering  financial assistance with tuition and other school-related needs, and by  providing mentoring and support programs once admitted. Eventually, the  initiatives were expanded to include skill development and assistance with job  placement in specific career fields, largely in the health care industry, that  were believed to be in high demand in Pennsylvania. According to the College,  these initiatives were targeted towards African Americans, but were not  race-exclusive. That is, the College told OCR that students of other races were  eligible to participate in both initiatives. OCR stated in its resolution  letter that it is not a violation of Title VI, in and of itself, for a  postsecondary institution to operate a race-themed mentoring and support  program.  Such programs are unlikely to  be subject to strict scrutiny review if they do not admit or exclude students  on the basis of their race and conduct broad-based recruiting, which may  include race-targeted recruiting.   However, OCR’s investigation revealed the College had abolished the  challenged program shortly after the complaint was filed and the College had  informed OCR that it did not intend to resume the program. Based on these  findings, and consistent with OCR’s case processing procedures, OCR  administratively closed this complaint as moot.

***Read    the Resolution Letter***PDF (201K)

Top
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 19 Placed on Calendar Senate (PCS)]

<DOC>

                                                        Calendar No. 28
115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 19

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
  United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer 
Financial Protection relating to prepaid accounts under the Electronic 
            Fund Transfer Act and the Truth in Lending Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 1, 2017

  Mr. Perdue (for himself, Mr. Cotton, Mr. Isakson, Mr. Johnson, Mr. 
 Lankford, Mr. Lee, Mr. Rounds, Mr. Enzi, Mr. Kennedy, Mr. Flake, Mr. 
McCain, and Mr. Cruz) introduced the following joint resolution; which 
 was read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and 
                             Urban Affairs

                             March 30, 2017

  Committee discharged, by petition, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 802(c), and 
                         placed on the calendar

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
  United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer 
Financial Protection relating to prepaid accounts under the Electronic 
            Fund Transfer Act and the Truth in Lending Act.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating 
to prepaid accounts under the Electronic Fund Transfer Act (15 U.S.C. 
1693 et seq.) and the Truth in Lending Act (15 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.) (81 
Fed. Reg. 83934 (November 22, 2016)), and such rule shall have no force 
or effect.

                                                        Calendar No. 28

115th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                             S. J. RES. 19

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
  United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer 
Financial Protection relating to prepaid accounts under the Electronic 
            Fund Transfer Act and the Truth in Lending Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             March 30, 2017

  Committee discharged, by petition, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 802(c), and 
                         placed on the calendar
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 5.0.3

Eastern Division

Stephen Johnson

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:12−cv−03014

Honorable Robert M. Dow Jr.

The City of Maywood, et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Thursday, May 3, 2012:

 MINUTE entry before Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr: MOTION by Plaintiff

Stephen Johnson Preserve Evidence [6] is granted. Mailed notice(tbk, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:12-cv-03014 Document #: 16 Filed: 05/03/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:37
**EXHIBIT 12**

 

**CASCADENATURAL GAS CORPORATIONCOMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES**

 
| ** **                            | ** ** | **Twelve Months Ended**    | ** ** |
|---------------------------------------|------------|--------------------------------------|------------|
| ** **                            | ** ** | **31-Mar-06**                        | ** ** | **30-Sep-05** | ** ** | **30-Sep-04** | ** ** | **30-Sep-03** | ** ** | **30-Sep-02** | ** ** | **30-Sep-01** | ** ** |
| ** **                            | ** ** | **(dollars in thousands)** | ** ** |
|                                  |       |                                 |       |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Fixed  charges, as defined:           |       |                                 |       |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Interest expense                      |       | $                                    | 11,725     |   | $ | 11,744 |   | $ | 12,375 |   | $ | 12,363 |   | $ | 12,384 |   | $ | 10,509 |   |
| Amortization of debt issuance expense |       | 393                                  |       | 372 |   | 618 |   | 696 |   | 652 |   | 607 |   |
|                                  |       |                                 |       |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Total fixed charges                   |       | $                                    | 12,118     |   | $ | 12,116 |   | $ | 12,993 |   | $ | 13,059 |   | $ | 13,036 |   | $ | 11,116 |   |
|                                  |       |                                 |       |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Earnings, as  defined:                |       |                                 |       |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Net income                            |       | $                                    | 12,289     |   | $ | 9,247 |   | $ | 13,302 |   | $ | 8,720 |   | $ | 10,458 |   | $ | 16,994 |   |
| Add (deduct):                         |       |                                 |       |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Income taxes                          |       | 7,589                                |       | 5,632 |   | 7,559 |   | 5,117 |   | 6,085 |   | 9,520 |   |
| Fixed charges                         |       | 12,118                               |       | 12,116 |   | 12,993 |   | 13,059 |   | 13,036 |   | 11,116 |   |
|                                  |       |                                 |       |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Total earnings                        |       | $                                    | 31,996     |   | $ | 26,995 |   | $ | 33,854 |   | $ | 26,896 |   | $ | 29,579 |   | $ | 37,630 |   |
| Ratio of  earnings to fixed charges   |       | 2.64                                 |       | 2.23 |   | 2.61 |   | 2.06 |   | 2.27 |   | 3.39 |   |

 

----
**-------~----------~----~--~-.**


### Swanson, Brian From: Wendy DeMane [wdemane@plattscsd.org] Sent: Sunday, February28,20105:56 PM To: Devany, Dennis (OST); Swanson,-Srian (OST) Subject: Cape Air in Plattsburgh
Dear Sirs: I am writing to you as acitizen ofClinton County, NY who uses the excellent sevices ofcape Air. Their services are excellent in the following ways: the fares are affordable; the scehduled flights are numerous; the personnel are polite and efficient. I believe thatourcommunity will be best served ifyou award them the EAS contract for Plattsburgh International Airport. As ataxpaying citizen, I believe it is wrong to pay a higher subsidy to Colgan than to cape Air. The government MUST take every opportunityto reduce costs, and contracting with cape Air will.be aligned with this beholden duty. As a parentwith adaughter in an expensive university, I know cape Air is a betterchoice for my family. IfColgan is awarded this contract, I will likely not be able

### to use their services due

### to their higherfares and their less flexible flight schedules. Mydaughter, at college in New England, is on an extremelytight budget. She can travel home only occasionally, and cape Air made that possible due to their numerous weekend flights and $69 fares. The higher Colgan fares and decreased weekend service will force us to choose other means oftransportation (bus or personal auto.) I do not care what size the airplane is forthe briefflightfrom Plattsburgh to Boston. Thankyou fortaking the time to consider my input. Respectfully, Wendy S. DeMane 23 Crescent Dr. Plattsburgh, NY 12901 518-563-6832

1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 5.0.3

Eastern Division

Hard Drive Productions, Inc.

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:12−cv−01532

Honorable Edmond E. Chang

Does 1−54

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Tuesday, May 1, 2012:

 MINUTE entry before Honorable Edmond E. Chang: Status and motion hearing

held. With regard to Defendant Doe 96.35.21.42s motion to quash and/or vacate subpoena

served on Charter Communications [12], Plaintiff's response is due 05/22/12, and Doe

96.35.21.42 may reply on 06/05/12. Plaintiff's response must specifically describe,

through evidence, the "geolocation" mechanism that Plaintiff used to identify the location

of the named IP addresses (including 96.35.21.42) as being in Illinois. The Court also

notes that the motion to quash seems to mistakenly assume that if Charter were to comply

with the subpoena and identify Doe, then as a matter of law the Court would have

personal jurisdiction over Doe. That is not the case; Doe would reserve his or her right to

challenge personal jurisdiction. The Court further notes that Doe 96.35.21.42 is litigating

the quash−motion anonymously, which is heavily disfavored. Doe 96.35.21.42 must

address that issue in the reply brief. On Plaintiffs motion to compel against Comcast [13],

Comcast's response is due on 05/15/12. Plaintiff may reply on 05/29/12. The ruling on the

motion to compel might very well bear on all of the Does; Plaintiff and Comcast should

address (among any other issues they wish to address) whether Plaintiff has properly

joined the defendants via a defined single swarm. No amended complaint shall be filed

until resolution of the motions before the Court. Status hearing set for 06/27/12 at 8:30

a.m. Mailed notice(slb, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:12-cv-01532 Document #: 17 Filed: 05/01/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:61