alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Filing a Complaint

**Overview** 	  Complainants and interviewees that cooperate in an investigation, proceeding, or hearing  conducted by United States Department of Education, Office for Civil Rights (OCR) are afforded certain rights and protections.  This brief description provides an overview  of these rights and protections.

 

----

**Notice of Complainant/Interviewee Rights and Protections**
                -  A Recipient may not force its employees to be  represented by the institution’s counsel nor may it intimidate, threaten,  coerce, or discriminate against any employee who refuses to reveal to the  Recipient the content of an interview.   An employee does, however, have the right to representation during an  interview with OCR.  The representative  may be the Recipient’s counsel, the employee’s private counsel, or anyone else  the interviewee authorizes to be present. 
                -  The interviewee’s right to representation does  not include a general right to have other persons present during the  interview.  Besides the OCR investigator  and/or attorney, the person being interviewed, and any needed interpreters, the  only other person present during any interview should be the interviewee’s  personally designated representative. 
                -  If the interviewee, other than an upper level  manager, identifies the Recipient’s counsel, supervisor, or manager for the  Recipient as a personal representative; the interviewee should be informed that  such a person may have a conflict of interest between that person’s  responsibilities to the Recipient, and the person’s responsibilities as a  personal representative. 
                -  If the representative with responsibilities to  the Recipient appears to interfere with OCR’s ability to interview the interviewee or obtain requested information; the representative will be asked to leave.  If the interviewee insists that the designated representative is present, and OCR has no other reason to  believe that the presence of the identified representative will interfere with the gathering of information, OCR will proceed with the interview. 
                -  The laws and regulations which govern OCR’s compliance and enforcement authority provide that neither Recipient nor other persons shall intimidate, threaten, coerce or discriminate against any individual because he/she has made a complaint, testified, assisted, or participated in  any manner in an investigation, proceeding, or hearing conducted under OCR’s jurisdiction. 
                -  Information obtained from the Complainant or  other individuals may be exempt from disclosure to the general public under the  Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) or the Privacy Act of 1974 (Privacy Act) if  release of such information could constitute an unwarranted invasion of  personal privacy. 

 

Notice Of Complainant/Interviewee Rights And Protections PDF (23K)
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18-3705

_____________________________

JUSTIN TAVARSE BARGE,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County.

Jennie Kinsey, Judge.

July 22, 2019

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

B.L. THOMAS, ROWE, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Megan Long, Assistant Public 

Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
#### C. Grady Broaddus, Respondent, v. Vanadium Corporation of America, Appellant.

Order, entered on-August 24, 1962, denying defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint for lack of jurisdiction, unanimously reversed, on the law, with $20 costs and disbursements to defendant-appellant, and the motion granted, with $10 costs. Plaintiff is not the grantee of the defendant and privity of contract does not otherwise appear. The action therefore is local and may not be brought in a State other than that in which the land is located, to wit, Ohio. *(Johnson*v. *Dunbar,*114 1ST. Y. S. 2d 845, affd. 282 App. Div. 720, affd. 306 N. Y. 697; *Keyes & Marshall Bros. Realty Co.*V. *Trustees of Canton Christian Coll.,*146 App. Div. 796, affd. 205 N. Y. 593; *Morris*V. *Kay,*172 App. Div. 145.) Moreover, section 536 of the Real Property Law (now Real Property Actions and Proceedings Law, § 121), permitting an action to recover damages for injuries to out-of-State real property, requires possession by the injured party at the time the damages are sustained. *(Stark*v. *Kowe Sound Co.,*148 Mise. 686, 691, affd. 241 App. Div. 637.) Concur — • Rabin, J. P., McNally, Eager, Steuer and Bergan, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 16 (Wednesday, January 27, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 7309-7310]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-01787]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES

National Endowment for the Arts


Arts Advisory Panel Meetings

AGENCY: National Endowment for the Arts, National Foundation on the 
Arts and the Humanities.

ACTION: Notice of meetings.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, 
notice is hereby given that 2 meetings of the Arts Advisory Panel to 
the National Council on the Arts will be held by teleconference.

DATES: See the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for individual meeting 
times and dates. All meetings

[[Page 7310]]

are Eastern time and ending times are approximate:

ADDRESSES: National Endowment for the Arts, Constitution Center, 400 
7th St. SW, Washington, DC 20506.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Further information with reference to 
these meetings can be obtained from Ms. Sherry Hale, Office of 
Guidelines & Panel Operations, National Endowment for the Arts, 
Washington, DC 20506; <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#3f575e535a4c7f5e4d4b4c11585049"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="274f464b4254674655535409404851">[email protected]</span></a>, or call 202/682-5696.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The closed portions of meetings are for the 
purpose of Panel review, discussion, evaluation, and recommendations on 
financial assistance under the National Foundation on the Arts and the 
Humanities Act of 1965, as amended, including information given in 
confidence to the agency. In accordance with the determination of the 
Chairman of September 10, 2019, these sessions will be closed to the 
public pursuant to subsection (c)(6) of section 552b of title 5, United 
States Code.

The Upcoming Meetings Are

    Literature Fellowships (review of applications): This meeting will 
be closed.
    Date and time: February 17, 2021; 2:00 p.m. to 3:00 p.m.
    South Arts Leadership (review of applications): This meeting will 
be closed.
    Date and time: February 17, 2021; 3:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m.

    Dated: January 22, 2021.
Sherry P. Hale,
Staff Assistant, National Endowment for the Arts.
[FR Doc. 2021-01787 Filed 1-26-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7537-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
### How do I get paid?

If you're a college student, you receive your student aid from your school's financial aid office. Contact your school for more information.

Other grantees receive payment through the Department's G5 system. When your grant is awarded, the Department will send you the information you need to get access to this system.

### How do I submit grant reports?

When your grant is awarded, you'll receive a Grant Award Notification that will tell you what reports are required and how to submit them. You may be able to submit reports for some programs online through the  G5 system.

### What if I need to make changes to my grant information?

The G5 system lets you make administrative changes to your grant award. The following types of changes are available: DUNS/SSN, address, key personnel, Project Director name and address, dates (no-cost time extensions), certifying representative, and others.

|Last Modified: 06/19/2014
|-------------------------
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-50891

Summary Calendar

JEFFREY T POPP,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

MCLENNAN COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT; AGRIPLEX TASK

FORCE; JUDGE GEORGE ALLEN; MCLENNAN COUNTY D.A.'S OFFICE;

SCOTT PETERSON; CHARLES MCDONALD; KAY SMITH,

Defendants-Appellees

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 6:08-CV-332

Before KING, STEWART, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jeffrey T. Popp moves this court for authorization to proceed in forma

pauperis (IFP) in this appeal from the district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C.

§ 1983 complaint as frivolous and for failure to state a claim. The district court

dismissed Popp’s complaint as barred by Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994),

as to defendants McLennan County Sheriff’s Department, Agriplex Task Force,

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

May 19, 2010

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 09-50891 Document: 00511115552 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/19/2010
No. 09-50891

2

Mclennan County D.A.’s Office, Scott Peterson, Charles McDonald, and Kay

Smith. The district court further determined that judicial immunity barred

Popp’s claims against Texas Judge George Allen and it dismissed those claims

as well. The district court denied Popp leave to proceed IFP on appeal and

certified that his appeal was not taken in good faith for the reasons stated in the

original dismissal. Popp’s IFP motion is a challenge to the district court’s

certification that his appeal is not taken in good faith. See Baugh v. Taylor, 117

F.3d 197, 202 (5th Cir. 1997); Jackson v. Johnson, 475 F.3d 261, 267 (5th Cir.

2007).

Popp does not address the district court’s reasons for dismissing his § 1983

complaint. Because he fails to identify any error in the district court’s analysis,

any argument is abandoned. See Brinkmann v. Dallas County Deputy Sheriff

Abner, 813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987). Popp has not shown that he will

present a nonfrivolous issue on appeal. See Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 220

(5th Cir. 1983). Accordingly, the motion for leave to proceed IFP is denied and

the appeal is dismissed as frivolous. See Baugh, 117 F.3d at 202 n.24; 5TH CIR.

R. 42.2.

The dismissal of the initial complaint as frivolous and for failure to state

a claim and the dismissal of this appeal as frivolous each count as one strike

under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Popp is cautioned that if he accumulates three

strikes under § 1915(g), he will not be able to proceed IFP in any civil action or

appeal filed while he is incarcerated or detained in any facility unless he is

under imminent danger of serious physical injury. See § 1915(g).

IFP MOTION DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTION WARNING

ISSUED.

Case: 09-50891 Document: 00511115552 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/19/2010
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 16 (Wednesday, January 27, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 7329-7330]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-01725]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration #16848 and #16849; CONNECTICUT Disaster Number 
CT-00052]


Presidential Declaration of a Major Disaster for Public 
Assistance Only for the State of Connecticut

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major 
disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of Connecticut (FEMA-
4580-DR), dated 01/12/2021.
    Incident: Tropical Storm Isaias.
    Incident Period: 08/04/2020.

DATES: Issued on 01/12/2021.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 03/15/2021.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 10/12/2021.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of 
the President's major disaster declaration on 01/12/2021, Private Non-
Profit organizations that provide essential services of a governmental 
nature may file disaster loan applications at the address listed above 
or other locally announced locations.
    The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected 
by the disaster:

Primary Counties and Areas: Fairfield, Hartford, Litchfield, Middlesex, 
New Haven, New London, Tolland, Windham and the Mashantucket Pequot 
Indian Tribe and Mohegan Tribe of Indians

    The Interest Rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Physical Damage:
  Non-Profit Organizations with Credit Available Elsewhere...      2.750

[[Page 7330]]

 
  Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere      2.750
For Economic Injury:
  Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere      2.750
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 168488 
and for economic injury is 168490.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

Cynthia Pitts,
Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2021-01725 Filed 1-26-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8026-03-P
### OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY

May 26, 2011

Dear Colleague:

I write to share with you the attached “Frequently Asked Questions About the  June 29, 2010, Dear Colleague Letter” (FAQ), developed by the U.S. Department  of Education’s Office for Civil Rights (OCR).  This FAQ is a follow-up to the  Dear Colleague Letter (DCL) that we sent to college and university presidents  on June 29, 2010, regarding the use of electronic book readers and other emergingtechnologies in educational settings. 

   As you may recall, the June 2010 DCL outlines concerns of the U.S. Department  of Education and the U.S. Department of Justice that arose in the context of  reviewing several complaints regarding compliance with long-standing requirements  of civil rights law.  In those cases, postsecondary educational institutions  were using electronic book readers that were inaccessible to students who are  blind or have low vision.  The DCL explains that under the Americans with Disabilities  Act of 1990 and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, educational    institutions cannot require the use of electronic book readers in a classroom    setting if the readers are not fully accessible to individuals with disabilities,    including individuals who are blind or have low vision, unless those individuals    are provided accommodations or modifications that permit them to receive    all the educational benefits provided by the technology in an equally effective    and equally integrated manner.  

  For more information, the June 2010 DCL is available at http://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/letters/colleague-20100629.html,  and the FAQ is available at http://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/dcl-ebook-faq-201105.html.

|   | Sincerely,                                   |
|--------|----------------------------------------------|
|   | /s/                                          |   |
|   | Russlynn Ali                                 |
|   | Assistant Secretary        for  Civil Rights |

Attachment
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 99-10342 

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

LARCARNLY CROSS,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:98-CR-41-1

--------------------

December 15, 1999

Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Larcarnly Cross appeals the sentence imposed for his guilty

plea conviction of distribution of less than 500 grams of

cocaine. Cross argues that he is entitled to a two-point

reduction in his base offense level for acceptance of

responsibility under United States Sentencing Guideline § 3E1.1,

despite twice testing positive for cocaine usage while on release

pending sentencing.

We will uphold the district court’s decision to deny a

reduction in offense level for acceptance of responsibility 
No. 99-10342

-2-

unless it is without foundation. United States v. Brace, 145

F.3d 247, 264 (5th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 119 S. Ct. 426

(1998). The district court’s decision not to award the reduction

to Cross is not without foundation. See United States v.

Watkins, 911 F.2d 983, 985 (5th Cir. 1990). The district court’s

judgment is AFFIRMED.
U.S. Dept Commerce/NOAA/NMFS/NWFSC/Publications NOAA-NMFS-NWFSC TM-5: Seasonal Changes in the Intertidal and Subtidal Macrobenthic Invertebrate Community Structure in Baker Bay, Lower Columbia River Estuary 
Figure 6. Seasonal changes (1980-81) of the macrobenthic invertebrate communities (defined by salinity preferences) and interstitial salinities at intertidal staitons (A) and at a subtidal station (B) in Baker Bay, Columbia River estuary. Salinity means and ranges for intertidal stations represented by points within capped vertical lines. 

Use your browser's BACK button to return to the text.

Return to Table of Contents
#### 227.7202-4 Contract clause.

A specific contract clause governing the Government's rights in commercial computer software or commercial computer software documentation is not prescribed. As required by 227.7202-3, the Government's rights to use, modify, reproduce, release, perform, display, or disclose computer software or computer software documentation shall be identified in a license agreement.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 899 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.899

                     One Hundred Fifteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
           the third day of January, two thousand and eighteen

                                 An Act

 
 To amend title 5, United States Code, to ensure that the requirements 
   that new Federal employees who are veterans with service-connected 
   disabilities are provided leave for purposes of undergoing medical 
   treatment for such disabilities apply to certain employees of the 
                     Veterans Health Administration.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
    This Act may be cited as the ``Veterans Providing Healthcare 
Transition Improvement Act''.
SEC. 2. DISABLED VETERAN LEAVE FOR HEALTH-CARE PROFESSIONALS IN 
VETERANS HEALTH ADMINISTRATION.
    (a) In General.--Section 6329(d)(1) of title 5, United States Code, 
is amended to read as follows:
        ``(1) the term `employee' has the meaning given such term in 
    section 2105, and includes--
            ``(A) an officer or employee of the United States Postal 
        Service or the Postal Regulatory Commission; and
            ``(B) notwithstanding subsection (a) of section 7421 of 
        title 38, an individual occupying a position listed in 
        subsection (b) of such section;''.
    (b) Applicability.--With respect to a position listed in section 
7421(b) of title 38, United States Code, the amendment made by 
subsection (a) shall apply to any individual appointed to such a 
position on or after the date of enactment of this Act.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
EXHIBIT 11
QMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
STATEMENT RE COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS (LOSS)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

(in thousands, except per share amounts)    September 27,         September 29,          September 30,
                                                1996                  1995                   1994
                                           ----------------      -----------------     ---------------

<S>                                        <C>                   <C>                   <C>

Net Income (Loss)                          $          4,253      $        (44,286)     $         2,960
                                           ================      =================     ===============

Shares used in this computation:
  Weighted average common shares
    outstanding                                      10,678                10,677               10,699

  Shares applicable to stock options, net
    of shares assumed to be purchased
    from proceeds at average market                      44                     0                   24
                                           ----------------      ----------------      ---------------


Total shares for earnings per common
  share computation (primary)                        10,722                10,677               10,723

  Shares applicable to stock options in
    addition to those used in primary
    computation due to the use of period-
    end market price when higher than
    average                                              33                     0                   38
                                           ----------------      ----------------      ---------------


Total fully diluted shares                           10,755                10,677               10,761
                                           ================      ================      ===============



Earnings (loss) per common share
  Primary:
    Net income (loss)                                $0.40                ($4.15)                $0.28
  Fully Diluted:
    Net income (loss)                                $0.40                ($4.15)                $0.28

  Weighted average number of shares
  used in computing earnings per share:
    Primary                                          10,722                10,677               10,723
    Fully diluted                                    10,755                10,677               10,761
</TABLE>