alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
204.1103 Procedures. See PGI 204.1103 for helpful information on navigation and data entry in the System for Award Management (SAM) database. ( 1 ) On contract award documents, use the contractor's legal or “doing business as” name and physical address information as recorded in the (SAM) database at the time of award.
( 2 ) When making a determination to exercise an option, or at any other time before issuing a modification other than a unilateral modification making an administrative change, ensure that— ( i ) The contractor's record is active in the SAM database; and
( ii ) The contractor's Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) number, Commercial and Government Entity (CAGE) code, name, and physical address are accurately reflected in the contract document.
( 3 ) At any time, if the DUNS number, CAGE code, contractor name, or physical address on a contract no longer matches the information on the contractor's record in the SAM database, the contracting officer shall process a novation or change-of-name agreement, or an address change, as appropriate.
( 4 ) See PGI 204.1103 for additional requirements relating to use of information in the SAM database.
( 5 ) On contractual documents transmitted to the payment office, provide the CAGE code, instead of the DUNS number or DUNS+4 number, in accordance with agency procedures.
[74 FR 37643, July 29, 2009, as amended at 78 FR 28757, May 16, 2013]
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 834 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 834

  To authorize the appropriation of funds to the Centers for Disease 
    Control and Prevention for conducting or supporting research on 
              firearms safety or gun violence prevention.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                April 5 (legislative day, April 4), 2017

Mr. Markey (for himself, Mr. Schumer, Mrs. Gillibrand, Mr. Durbin, Mr. 
 Whitehouse, Mr. Reed, Mr. Blumenthal, Ms. Warren, Ms. Duckworth, Mr. 
Casey, Mrs. Murray, Mr. Wyden, Mr. Murphy, Mr. Kaine, Mr. Sanders, Mr. 
Schatz, Ms. Hirono, Ms. Baldwin, Mr. Brown, Mr. Carper, Mr. Van Hollen, 
 Mr. Cardin, Mr. Coons, Mr. Booker, Ms. Harris, Mr. Menendez, and Mrs. 
  Feinstein) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
  referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To authorize the appropriation of funds to the Centers for Disease 
    Control and Prevention for conducting or supporting research on 
              firearms safety or gun violence prevention.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FUNDING FOR RESEARCH BY CDC ON FIREARMS SAFETY OR GUN 
              VIOLENCE PREVENTION.

    There is authorized to be appropriated to the Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention $10,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2018 
through 2023 for the purpose of conducting or supporting research on 
firearms safety or gun violence prevention under the Public Health 
Service Act (42 U.S.C. 201 et seq.). The amount authorized to be 
appropriated by the preceding sentence is in addition to any other 
amounts authorized to be appropriated for such purpose.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 99.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the revised annual report of Thunder Mountain Gold, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the period ended December 31, 2001 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robin S. McRae, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and,



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/ Robin S. McRae

-----------------------------------------

Robin  S.  McRae

Secretary/Treasurer and Director and Chief Financial Officer

Date:  November 14, 2002
DISMISS and Opinion Filed October 1, 2021

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 21

- 00554

- CV

DAVID DOSCHER AND KAREN DOSCHER , Appellant s V. VINTAGE ESTATE HOMES OF TEXAS, LLC , Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC

- 20

- 04636

- A

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Molberg, Nowell, and Goldstein

Opinion by Justice Nowell

Before the Court is appellants’ unopposed motion to dismiss the appeal

because the parties have reached a settlement in the underlying litigation. We grant

the motion to dismiss the appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1(a)( 1 ).

210554f.p05 /Erin A. Nowell/ /
ERIN NOWELL JUSTICE– 2

– 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

DAVID DOSCHER AND KAREN DOSCHER, Appellant s

No. 05

- 21

- 00554

- CV V.

VINTAGE ESTATE HOMES OF TEXAS, LLC, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC

- 20

- 04636

- A. Opinion delivered by Justice Nowell. Justices Molberg and Goldstein participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED

.
Subject to any agreement between the parties, i t is ORDERED that appellee VINTAGE ESTATE H OMES OF TEXAS, LLC recover its costs of this appeal from appellant s DAVID DOSCHER AND KAREN DOSCHER.

Judgment entered this 1 st day of October

, 2021

.
#### 19.1507 [Reserved]
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 01516**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  

### x 01516\01516_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook



### 01516\01516_Completeness_Checklist.XLS EPA Completeness Review Checklist 

### 01516\01516_HardcopyLog.DOC EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted 

### x 01516\01516_Part A.XLS Plant submitted survey file 

### x 01516\01516_Part B.XLS Plant submitted survey file 

### x 01516\01516_Part C.XLS Plant submitted survey file 

### x 01516\01516_Part D.XLS Plant submitted survey file 

### x 01516\01516_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file



### 01516\Certification Statement Plant ID 01516.PDF Plant certification statement 

### x 01516\Data from A-11.xls Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 

### x 01516\Follow up\01516_Email Correspondence.pdf Draft Questions for Follow Up 

### x 01516\Supplemental Documents\01516_1974 EA for Dale Ash Pond 4.PDF Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 

### x 01516\Supplemental Documents\01516_Dale ICR Aerial.PDF Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 

### x 01516\Supplemental Documents\01516_Dale Water Balance.PDF Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 

### x 01516\Survey Review Table_Revised.XLS Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database

. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket.
BILL OF COSTS

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, SEVENTH DISTRICT, AT AMARILLO

No. 07-15-00080-CV

In the Interest of K.N.M.M., a Child

v.

(No. DCPS-14-7079 IN 100TH DISTRICT COURT OF DONLEY COUNTY)

Type of Fee Charges Paid By

Motion fee

Indigent

Statewide efiling fee

Filing

Supreme Court chapter 51 fee

Indigent

Supreme Court chapter 51 fee

Filing

Statewide efiling fee $10.00

$25.00

$20.00

$100.00

$50.00

$25.00

$50.00

$100.00

$20.00 EXEMPT

INDIGENT

INDIGENT

INDIGENT

INDIGENT

INDIGENT

INDIGENT

INDIGENT

INDIGENT Martha Garcia

none

none

none

none

Earl Griffin

Earl Griffin

Earl Griffin

Earl Griffin

Balance of costs owing to the Seventh Court of Appeals, Amarillo, Texas: $0.00

Court costs in this cause shall be paid as per

the Judgment issued by this Court.

I, VIVIAN LONG, CLERK OF THE SEVENTH COURT OF APPEALS OF THE

STATE OF TEXAS, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true and correct copy of

the cost bill of THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS,

showing the charges and payments, in the above numbered and styled cause, as the same appears

of record in this office.

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, witness my hand

and the Seal of the COURT OF APPEALS for the

Seventh District of Texas on September 23, 2015

.



# Vivian Long

VIVIAN LONG, CLERK
1910.004-72 Solicitations, brand name or equal descriptions. ( a ) An entry substantially as follows shall be prominently inserted in the item listing after each item or component part of an end item to which a brand name or equal purchase description applies. Bidding on: Manufacturer's Name: Brand: No.:
( b ) Because bidders frequently overlook the requirements of the clause at 1952.210-70 “Brand Name or Equal,” the following note shall be inserted in the item listing after each brand name or equal item (or component part), or at the bottom of each page, listing several such items, or in a manner that may otherwise direct the offeror's attention to this clause. Offerors offering other than brand name items identified herein should furnish with their offers adequate information to ensure that a determination can be made as to equality of the product(s) offered (see the provision “Brand Name or Equal” set forth in 1952.210-70 of the solicitation).
( c ) If offeror samples are requested for brand name or equal acquisitions, the above notice shall not be included in the solicitation.
Proposal from Alyssa Dobson, Alternate for 4 Year Publics for R2T4

6) A student is not considered to have withdrawn if – 

(i) The institution’s records treat a student as having never attended courses for that payment 

period or period of enrollment; 

(ii) The institution returns all the title IV aid disbursed to the student for that payment period or 

period of enrollment; 

(iii) The institution refunds all institutional charges related to tuition and mandatory fees to the 

student for the payment period or period of enrollment. The institution may charge for any 

consumable billable items, such as room and board, based on a direct proration of use for the 

period; and 

(iv) The institution writes off or cancels any current year balance owed by the student to the 

institution due to the institution’s returning of title IV funds to the Department. (this item can be 

removed as there would not be any remaining balance unless the student actually consumed 

housing or food)

(7) A confined or incarcerated individual as defined in 34 CFR 600.2 is not considered to have 

withdrawn anytime the requirements of an approved leave of absence are not met if any of the 

following events occur:
Higher Learning Commission Negiogiated Rulemaking on Accreditation and Innovation: 2019

306 

7 

5 

1 1 

4 

1 

0 

0 

7 

1 

10 

DC 4

81 19 

11 

10 

27 

50 

4 

10 

17 

0 

10 

57 

97 123 

385 

488 471 

201 

84 175 

299 

306 

233 

50 

56 

32 

178 

67 311 

6 

1 

2 

12 

1 

4 

99 

2 

4 163 International Institutions 

Branch Campuses and

Additional Locations

OF HLC MEMBER INSTITUTIONS BY STATE 

Higher Learning Commission 

Middle States Commission on Higher 

Education 

New England Association of Schools 

and Colleges 

Northwest Commission on Colleges 

and Universities 

Southern Association of Colleges and 

Schools Commission on Colleges 

Western Association of Schools and 

Colleges (ACCJC, SCUC) 

hlcommission.org.
19.804-6 Indefinite-delivery contracts. ( a ) Separate offers and acceptances are not required for individual orders under multiple-award contracts (including the Federal Supply Schedules managed by GSA, multi-agency contracts or Governmentwide acquisition contracts, or indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contracts) that have been set aside for exclusive competition among 8(a) contractors, and the individual order is to be competed among all 8(a) contract holders. SBA's acceptance of the original contract is valid for the term of the contract. Offers and acceptances are required for individual orders under multiple-award contracts that have not been set aside for exclusive competition among 8(a) contractors.
( b ) The contracting officer may issue an order on a sole source basis when— ( 1 ) The multiple-award contract was set aside for exclusive competition among 8(a) participants;
( 2 ) The order has an estimated value less than or equal to the dollar thresholds set forth at 19.805-1(a)(2); and
( 3 ) The offering and acceptance procedures at 19.804-2 and 19.804-3 are followed.
( c ) The contracting officer may issue an order directly to one 8(a) contractor in accordance with 19.504(c)(1)(ii) when— ( 1 ) The multiple-award contract was reserved for 8(a) participants;
( 2 ) The order has an estimated value less than or equal to $7 million for acquisitions assigned manufacturing NAICS codes and $4.5 million for all other acquisitions; and
( 3 ) The offering and acceptance procedures at 19.804-2 and 19.804-3 are followed.
( d ) An 8(a) contractor may continue to accept new orders under the contract, even if it exits the 8(a) program, or becomes other than small for the NAICS code(s) assigned to the contract.
( e ) Agencies may continue to take credit toward their prime contracting small disadvantaged business or small business goals for orders awarded to 8(a) contractors, even after the contractor's 8(a) program term expires, the contractor otherwise exits the 8(a) program, or the contractor becomes other than small for the NAICS code(s) assigned under the 8(a) contract. However, if an 8(a) contractor rerepresents that it is other than small for the NAICS code(s) assigned under the contract in accordance with 19.301-2 or, where ownership or control of the 8(a) contractor has changed and SBA has granted a waiver to allow the contractor to continue performance (see 13 CFR 124.515), the agency may not credit any subsequent orders awarded to the contractor towards its small disadvantaged business or small business goals.
[85 FR 11765, Feb. 27, 2020, as amended at 85 FR 62489, Oct. 2, 2020; 86 FR 61041, Nov. 4, 2021]
Exhibit 31.2
 
      a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b)
    
    [Intentionally omitted];c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andd)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 December 5, 2008
    /s/ J. Per BrodinJ. Per BrodinChief Financial Officer 34
August 20,2013 

To: TO: FROM: Proposed Rule: 

Ib.lur

Co

KevhJF*,- ad 

~~s

JiJahHq Ado- 

--*-aBm8don3~~Couwd 

NOTICEi OF ACTION TAKEN BY THE LEG1SLA.m RULE-MAKiNGREViEW 

Natalie E. Tennant, Secretary of State. State Register 

Krlstln A. Boggs DEP - Air Quality 

601 57th Street, SE 

Charleston, WV 25304 

Legislative RuleMaking Committee 

Permb for Construction and Major Modification of Major Stationary Soums for the Prevention 

The Legislative Rule-Making Review Committee Recornrneds that Ule West Virginia Legistaturn 

1. Authorize the agency to promulgate the LegisIative rule: 

(A) as originally filed (B) as modified by the agency 

2. Authofize the agency to pmulgate the Legislative rule with certain amendments; amendments 

and a statement of reasons for such recommendation is attached. 

3. Au~~ the agency to promulgate the Legislative rule as modified with certain amendments; 

amendments and a statement of reasons for such recommendation is attached. 

4. Recommends that the Legislature rule be withdrawn; a statement of reasons for the 

recommendation is attached.
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Iv an Garay Lopez

, * From the 3 5th District Court

of Brown County

Trial Court No. CR21310

.

Vs. No. 11

- 15

- 00313

- CR * September 28 , 2018

The Sta te of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by Bailey, C.J.

(Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.

, Gray, C.J., sitting by assignment,

and Wright, S.C.J., sitting by

assignment)

(Willson, J., not participating)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there

is no error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court ’ s

opinion, the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
#### 1371.110 Liability and insurance.

Insert clause 1352.271-79, *Liability and Insurance,* in all solicitations and contracts for ship repair.
Exhibit 32.1



Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350

(Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)



The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company



In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period
ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Matthew K. Rose, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Thomas N. Hund, Executive
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies that, to his knowledge on the date hereof:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: July 26, 2004



|                                                |  |                                                     
|----------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Matthew K. Rose                             |  | /s/ Thomas N. Hund                                  
|Matthew K. Rose                                 |  | Thomas N. Hund                                      
|Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company and will be retained by The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
227.676 Foreign patent interchange agreements. ( a ) Patent interchange agreements between the United States and foreign governments provide for the use of patent rights, compensation, free licenses, and the establishment of committees to review and make recommendations on these matters. The agreements also may exempt the United States from royalty and other payments. The contracting officer shall ensure that royalty payments are consistent with patent interchange agreements.
( b ) Assistance with patent rights and royalty payments in the United States European Command (USEUCOM) area of responsibility is available from HQ USEUCOM, ATTN: ECLA, Unit 30400, Box 1000, APO AE 09128; Telephone: DSN 430-8001/7263, Commercial 49-0711-680-8001/7263; Telefax: 49-0711-680-5732.
[62 FR 34125, June 24, 1997, as amended at 63 FR 11534, Mar. 9, 1998]
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 01516

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2

File Name Description

x 01516\01516_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

01516\01516_Completeness_Checklist.XLS EPA Completeness Review Checklist

01516\01516_HardcopyLog.DOC EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 01516\01516_Part A.XLS Plant submitted survey file

x 01516\01516_Part B.XLS Plant submitted survey file

x 01516\01516_Part C.XLS Plant submitted survey file

x 01516\01516_Part D.XLS Plant submitted survey file

x 01516\01516_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file

01516\Certification Statement Plant ID 01516.PDF Plant certification statement

x 01516\Data from A-11.xls Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 01516\Follow up\01516_Email Correspondence.pdf Draft Questions for Follow Up

x 01516\Supplemental Documents\01516_1974 EA for Dale Ash Pond 4.PDF Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 01516\Supplemental Documents\01516_Dale ICR Aerial.PDF Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 01516\Supplemental Documents\01516_Dale Water Balance.PDF Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 01516\Survey Review Table_Revised.XLS Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
# Issue Paper 7

# Session 3: March 16-18, 2016

**Issue:**Revise the Direct Consolidation Loan regulations to allow for the consolidation of Nurse Faculty Loans. 

**Statutory cite:**§§428C(a)(4)(E) and 455(g) of the Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended 

**Regulatory cite:**34 CFR 685.220(b)(21)

**Summary of change:**

The change would revise 34 CFR 685.221(b)(21) to reflect the statutory language in section 428(C)(a)(4)(E) of the HEA, which provides that loans made under “part E of title VIII of the Public Health Service Act [42 USC 297a et seq.]” may be consolidated into a Direct Consolidation Loan. Loans made under part E of title VIII of the Public Health Service Act include both Nursing Student Loans and Nurse Faculty Loans.

**Changes:** See regulatory text below.

**§685.220 Consolidation.**

(a) * * *

(b) *Loans eligible for consolidation.* The following loans may be consolidated into a Direct Consolidation Loan:

*  *  *

(21) Nursing loans made under part E of title VIII of the Public Health Service Act.

*  *  *