7356 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 17 / Thursday, January 28, 2021 / Notices 

7For a complete description of the scope of the 

order, see Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision 

Memorandum for Final Results of the First Sunset 

Review of Certain Steel Nails from the Sultanate of 

Oman,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby 

adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision 

Memorandum). 

1See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews, 85 

FR 61928 (October 1, 2020); see also Certain Steel 

Grating from the People’s Republic of China: 

Antidumping Duty Order, 75 FR 43143 (July 23, 

2010), and Certain Steel Grating From the People’s 

Republic of China: Notice of Correction to the Final 

Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and 

Antidumping Duty Order, 75 FR 69626 (November 

15, 2010) (collectively, Order). 

2See Domestic Interested Parties’ Letter, ‘‘Steel 

Grating from the People’s Republic of China: Notice 

of Intent to Participate in Sunset Review,’’ dated 

October 16, 2020. 

3See Domestic Interested Parties’ Letter, ‘‘Steel 

Grating from the People’s Republic of China: 

Substantive Response to the Notice of Initiation of 

Sunset Review,’’ dated November 2, 2020 

(Substantive Response). 

4For a complete description of the background of 

this sunset review of the Order, see Memorandum, 

‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum for the 

Expedited Second Sunset Review of the 

Antidumping Duty Order on Certain Steel Grating 

from the People’s Republic of China,’’ dated 

concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this 

notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum). 

subheadings. While the HTSUS 

subheadings are provided for 

convenience and customs purposes, the 

written description of the scope of this 

order is dispositive.7

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised for the final results 

of this sunset review are addressed in 

the Issues and Decision Memorandum. 

The Issues and Decision Memorandum 

is a public document and is on file 

electronically via Enforcement and 

Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 

ACCESS is available to registered users 

at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a 

complete version of the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum can be accessed 

directly at https://

enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html. 

The signed and the electronic versions 

of the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum are identical in content. 

A list of topics included in the Issues 

and Decision Memorandum is provided 

as an Appendix to this notice. 

Final Results of Sunset Review 

We determine that revocation of the 

AD Order on steel nails from Oman 

would be likely to lead to continuation 

or recurrence of dumping at weighted 

average margins up to 9.10 percent. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

This notice also serves as the only 

reminder to parties subject to an 

administrative protective order (APO) of 

their responsibility concerning the 

return or destruction of proprietary 

information disclosed under APO in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. 

Timely notification of the return or 

destruction of APO materials or 

conversion to judicial protective order is 

hereby requested. Failure to comply 

with the regulations and terms of an 

APO is a violation which is subject to 

sanction. 

We are issuing and publishing the 

final results of this full sunset review in 

accordance with sections 751(c)(5)(A), 

752(c), and 777(i) of the Tariff Act of 

1930, as amended, and 19 CFR 

351.218(f)(3). 

Dated: January 22, 2021. 

Christian Marsh, 

Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance. 

Appendix 

List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum: 

1. Summary 

2. Background 

3. Scope of the Order 

4. Discussion of the Issues 

Comment 1: Whether the Department of 

Commerce (Commerce) Should Consider 

the Dumping Margin Calculated for a 

Defunct Company 

Comment 2: Whether Commerce Should 

Consider the ‘‘All Others’’ Rate 

Comment 3: Whether Commerce Should 

Consider the Effect of Section 232 Steel 

Tariffs on Import Volumes 

5. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2021–01910 Filed 1–27–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–947] 

Certain Steel Grating From the 

People’s Republic of China: Final 

Results of the Expedited Second 

Sunset Review of the Antidumping 

Duty Order 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) finds that revocation of the 

antidumping duty (AD) order on certain 

steel grating from the People’s Republic 

of China (China) would likely lead to 

continuation or recurrence of dumping, 

at the level indicated in the ‘‘Final 

Results of Sunset Review’’ section of 

this notice, infra. 

DATES: Applicable January 28, 2021. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Kristen Ju, AD/CVD Operations, Office 

IV, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–3699. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

After publication of the notice of 

initiation of this sunset review of the 

AD order on certain steel grating from 

China,1 pursuant to section 751(c) of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), 

the Metal Grating Coalition (Coalition) 

consisting of Nucor Grating, IKG USA, 

LLC, Ohio Gratings, Inc., Interstate 

Gratings, LLC and Lichtgitter USA Inc. 

(collectively, the domestic interested 

parties) filed with Commerce a timely 

and complete notice of intent to 

participate in the sunset review,2 and a 

timely and adequate substantive 

response.3 Commerce did not receive a 

substantive response from any 

respondent interested party. As a result, 

pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) of the 

Act and 19 CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), 

Commerce conducted an expedited 

(120-day) sunset review of the Order.4

Scope of the Order 

The products covered by the order are 

certain steel grating, consisting of two or 

more pieces of steel, including loadbearing pieces and cross pieces, joined 

by any assembly process, regardless of: 

(1) Size or shape; (2) method of 

manufacture; (3) metallurgy (carbon, 

alloy, or stainless); (4) the profile of the 

bars; and (5) whether or not they are 

galvanized, painted, coated, clad or 

plated. 

Certain steel grating that is the subject 

of the order is currently classifiable in 

the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the 

United States (HTSUS) under 

subheading 7308.90.7000. While the 

HTSUS subheading is provided for 

convenience and customs purposes, the 

written description of the scope of the 

order is dispositive. 

For a full description of the scope of 

the order, see the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum. 

Analysis of Comments Received 

A complete discussion of all issues 

raised in this sunset review, including 

the likelihood of continuation or 

recurrence of dumping in the event of 

revocation of the Order and the 

magnitude of the dumping margins 

likely to prevail if the Order were to be 

Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 17 / Thursday, January 28, 2021 / Notices 7357 

5 Id. 

1See Glycine from the People’s Republic of 

China: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review and Preliminary 

Determination of No Shipments; 2019–2020, 85 FR 

67332 (October 22, 2020) (Preliminary Results). 

2 In separate scope rulings, Commerce determined 

that: (a) D(-) Phenylglycine Ethyl Dane Salt is 

outside the scope of the order and (b) Chineseglycine exported from India remains the same class 

or kind of merchandise as the China-origin glycine 

imported into India. See Notice of Scope Rulings 

and Anticircumvention Inquiries, 62 FR 62288 

(November 21, 1997) and Glycine from the People’s 

Republic of China: Final Partial Affirmative 

Determination of Circumvention of the 

Antidumping Duty Order, 77 FR 73426 (December 

10, 2012), respectively. 

3See Memorandum, ‘‘Glycine from the People’s 

Republic of China: Issues and Decision 

Memorandum for the Final Results of 

Administrative Review; 2019–2020,’’ dated 

concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this 

notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum). 

4See Preliminary Results, 85 FR at 67322–23. 

revoked, is provided in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum.5 A list of the 

sections in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum is attached as an 

appendix to this notice. The Issues and 

Decision Memorandum is a public 

document and is on file electronically 

via Enforcement and Compliance’s 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Centralized Electronic Service System 

(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to 

registered users at http://

access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete 

version of the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum can be accessed on the 

internet at http://enforcement.trade.gov/ 

frn/. The signed and electronic versions 

of the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum are identical in content. 

Final Results of Sunset Review 

Pursuant to sections 751(c)(1), 

752(c)(1) and (3) of the Act, Commerce 

determines that revocation of the Order 

would likely lead to continuation or 

recurrence of dumping, and that the 

magnitude of the dumping margins 

likely to prevail are weighted-average 

dumping margins up to 145.18 percent. 

Administrative Protective Orders 

This notice also serves as the only 

reminder to parties subject to 

administrative protective order (APO) of 

their responsibility concerning the 

return or destruction of proprietary 

information disclosed under APO in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. 

Timely notification of the return or 

destruction of APO materials, or the 

conversion to judicial protective order, 

is hereby requested. Failure to comply 

with the regulations and terms of an 

APO is a violation which is subject to 

sanction. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing these 

results and notice in accordance with 

sections 751(c), 752(c), and 777(i)(1) of 

the Act, and 19 CFR 351.218 and 19 

CFR 351.221(c)(5)(ii). 

Dated: January 22, 2021. 

Christian Marsh, 

Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance. 

Appendix—Sections in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. History of the Order 

V. Legal Framework 

VI. Discussion of the Issues 

1. Likelihood of Continuation or 

Recurrence of Dumping 

2. Magnitude of the Margin of Dumping 

Likely to Prevail 

VII. Final Results of Sunset Review 

VIII. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2021–01909 Filed 1–27–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–836] 

Glycine From the People’s Republic of 

China: Final Results of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review; 2019– 

2020 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) continues to find that 

certain companies covered by this 

administrative review made no 

shipments of subject merchandise 

during the period of review (POR) 

March 1, 2019, through February 29, 

2020. Commerce also continues to find 

that Avid Organics Private Limited 

(Avid) is part of the China-wide entity. 

DATES: Applicable January 28, 2021. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Yang Jin Chun, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–5760. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On October 22, 2020, Commerce 

published the preliminary results of the 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on glycine from 

the People’s Republic of China (China) 

covering the POR.1 We received 

comments from interested parties with 

respect the Preliminary Results. The 

deadline for these final results of review 

is February 19, 2021. We conducted this 

administrative review in accordance 

with section 751 of the Tariff Act of 

1930, as amended (the Act). 

Scope of the Order 

The product covered by this 

antidumping duty order is glycine, 

which is a free-flowing crystalline 

material, like salt or sugar. Glycine is 

produced at varying levels of purity and 

is used as a sweetener/taste enhancer, a 

buffering agent, reabsorbable amino 

acid, chemical intermediate, and a metal 

complexing agent. This proceeding 

includes glycine of all purity levels. 

Glycine is currently classified under 

subheading 2922.49.4020 of the 

Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the 

United States (HTSUS).2 Although the 

HTSUS subheading is provided for 

convenience and customs purposes, the 

written description of the merchandise 

under the order is dispositive. 

Analysis of Comments Received 

The sole issue raised with respect to 

the Preliminary Results by parties to this 

administrative review is addressed in 

the Issues and Decision Memorandum.3

The issue raised by parties and the other 

areas covered in the Issues and Decision 

Memroandum are identified in the 

appendix to this notice. The Issues and 

Decision Memorandum is a public 

document and is on file electronically 

via Enforcement and Compliance’s 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Centralized Electronic Service System 

(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to 

registered users at https://

access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete 

version of the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum can be accessed directly 

at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/ 

index.html. The signed and electronic 

versions of the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum are identical in content. 

Changes From the Preliminary Results 

We made no revisions to the 

Preliminary Results. 

Final Determination of No Shipments 

We preliminarily determined that 

Studio Disrupt, Mulji Mehta 

Enterprises, Kumar Industries, and 

Baoding Mantong Fine Chemistry Co., 

Ltd., did not have shipments of subject 

merchandise during the POR.4 After the 

Preliminary Results, we received no 

comments or additional information 

with respect to these four companies. 

Therefore, for the final results, we