alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Michael Rutkowski, an Infant, by His Guardian ad Litem, Henry Rutkowski, et al., Respondents, et al., Plaintiffs, v. H. C. Bohack Co., Inc., et al., Appellants.

In an action to recover damages for personal injury, loss of services and medical expenses, defendants appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered October 4, 1961 after trial on a jury’s verdict for $25,000 in favor of the infant plaintiff Michael Rutkowski, and for $5,000 in favor of plaintiff Henry Rutkowski (the infant’s father). Judgment reversed on the law and on the facts, and new trial granted, with costs to abide the event, unless, within 30 days after entry of the order hereon, the plaintiffs shall stipulate: (a) to reduce to $9,000 the amount of the verdict in favor of the infant plaintiff; and (b) to reduce to $1,000 the amount of the verdict in favor of the plaintiff Henry Rutkowski, in which event the judgment, as so reduced, is affirmed, without costs. In our opinion, the verdict as to both plaintiffs was excessive. The award to the infant plaintiff, insofar as it was based on a finding that he had suffered permanent serious brain damage, is against the weight of the credible evidence. The verdict in favor of the plaintiff father is neither supported by a showing of tangible depreciation in services rendered by the infant, nor based on expenses incurred in his behalf. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Brennan and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS'


Laser Photonics, Inc:

         We hereby consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 of our report dated February 23, 2000, except for the last
paragraph of Note 9 which is dated as of March 16, 2000, relating to the
consolidated balance sheets of Laser Photonics, Inc., as of December 31, 1999
and 1998 and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders'
equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three year period ended
December 31, 1999 which report appears on page F-2 of the December 31, 1999
annual report on Form 10-K of Laser Photonics, Inc.



/s/ HEIN +ASSOCIATES LLP


HEIN + ASSOCIATES LLP
Certified Public Accountants

Orange, California
April 12, 2000
EXHIBIT 31.2

Certifications:

I, Kevan B. Hensman, certify that:

1.      I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Aspen Exploration Corporation;

2.      Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.      Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.      The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and we have:

     a)      designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

     b)     designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

     c)      evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     d)      disclosed in this report any changes in the company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal control over financial reporting.

5.      The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

     a)      all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

     b)      any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. John Wesley Kenyon, Appellant.

Order unanimously affirmed. (See *People*v. *Bennett,*14 N Y 2d 851; *People ex rel. Stickle*v. *Fay,*14 N Y 2d 683.) (Appeal from order of Oswego County Court denying, without a hearing, motion to vacate a judgment of conviction for burglary, third degree, and petit larceny rendered April 23, 1964.) Present — Bastow, J. P., Goldman, Henry, Noonan and Del Vecchio, JJ.
Order Form (01/2005)

United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois

Name of Assigned Judge

or Magistrate Judge Matthew F. Kennelly Sitting Judge if Otherthan Assigned Judge

CASE NUMBER 12 C 1668 DATE 9/24/2012

CASE

TITLE

Percy Groves Jr. vs. United Airlines

DOCKET ENTRY TEXT

For the reasons stated below, plaintiff’s current complaint is subject to dismissal. The Court will dismiss the

complaint unless, by no later than 10/22/12, plaintiff files an amended complaint that truthfully reflects that

he has obtained a notice of right to sue, and attaches that notice to the amended complaint. The Clerk is

directed to mail plaintiff a copy of the form for an amended complaint of employment discrimination.

O[ For further details see text below.] Docketing to mail notices.

STATEMENT

Plaintiff filed a pro se complaint of employment discrimination on 3/7/12, and the case was assigned to this

judge’s docket, but unfortunately the Clerk of Court did not bring the case to the judge’s attention, and the

judge has only recently discovered that the case was pending.

Plaintiff’s complaint and the attached charge that he filed with the Equal Employment Opportunity

Commission (EEOC) reflect that he asserts claims of race, age, and disability-based discrimination based on

actions taken by the defendant in 2005 and 2006. Plaintiff filed this suit in March 2012.

Any claim that plaintiff might make under 42 U.S.C.§ 1981 is barred by the four-year statute of limitations

that applies to claims under that statute. See 28 U.S.C. § 1658; Jones v. R.R. Donnelley & Sons, 541 U.S.

369 (2004).

As for any claim that plaintiff might make under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Age

Discrimination in Employment, or the Americans with Disabilities Act, such claims cannot be filed in court

unless plaintiff first exhausts administrative remedies with the EEOC and obtains a notice of right to sue. 

Plaintiff’s complaint does not reflect that he has obtained a notice of right to sue; indeed, he left that portion

of the form complaint blank.

For these reasons, the Court will dismiss plaintiff’s complaint unless he files an amended complaint, by no

later than 10/22/12, reflecting that he has obtained a notice of right to sue.

 Courtroom Deputy

Initials:

12C1668 Percy Groves Jr. vs. United Airlines Page 1 of 1
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

TEJANI RODRIGUEZ,

Appellant,

v.

ALBERTO PEREZ,

Appellee.

No. 4D20-544

[August 11, 2021]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Peter Holden, Judge; L.T. Case No. 15-9539 FMCE.

Scott J. Brook of Scott J. Brook, P.A., Coral Springs, for appellant.

Alan D. Sackrin of Sackrin & Tolchinsky, P.A., Hallandale Beach, for 

appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 

1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979).

CIKLIN, GERBER and FORST, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                            5
<LEGEND>                            THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY
                                    FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
                                    THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF NIAGARA
                                    CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES AND IS
                                    QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
                                    TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                               JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                 DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                       2,234,181
<SECURITIES>                                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                                54,051,071
<ALLOWANCES>                                 925,000
<INVENTORY>                                  59,441,872
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             121,127,264
<PP&E>                                       124,143,925
<DEPRECIATION>                               21,160,043
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               227,934,299
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        66,108,244
<BONDS>                                      87,387,943
<COMMON>                                     9,998
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        0
<PREFERRED>                                  0
<OTHER-SE>                                   56,451,280
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 227,934,299
<SALES>                                      264,221,888
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             264,221,888
<CGS>                                        228,274,501
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                228,274,501
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             24,440,790
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           5,630,549
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              6,055,625
<INCOME-TAX>                                 2,299,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          3,756,625
<DISCONTINUED>                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              0
<CHANGES>                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,756,725
<EPS-BASIC>                                  .40
<EPS-DILUTED>                                .40


</TABLE>
#### WALKER v. FARRELL.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.

June 22, 1903.)

1. Conversion—Transfer of Title—Evidence.

In an action for conversion of property, a receipt given to plaintiff’s assignor, acknowledging the payment of a certain sum for the property, in which the assignor’s name is not mentioned, is not sufficient evidence of the transfer of title.

2. Same—Expert Evidence.

An expert on the value of property cannot properly state what he offered- for the property.

Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Second District.

Action by Jacob Walker against Thomas Farrell. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. Reversed.

Argued before FREEDMAN, P. J., and GlLDERSLEEVE and MacLEAN, JJ.

Sticlcney, Spencer & Ordway, for appellant.

Aaron Morris, for respondent.

*183GILDERSLEEVE, J.

This action was brought to recover damages for the conversion of certain property, enumerated in plaintiff’s bill of particulars as:

Three butcher ice boxes at $30 each.................................. $ 90

Two mahogany bedsteads at $5 each.................................. 10

Nine stained glass windows at $3 each................................ 27

$127

The plaintiff’s assignor, one Michael Walsh, claimed to have purchased the property for $5, under the description of “firewood.” The jury rendered a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, and assessed the damages at $75. There is no evidence that plaintiff’s assignor ever had possession of the property. The plaintiff’s right to maintain the action rests, therefore, upon his right to possession of the property. The only evidence of transfer of title to Walsh consists of a receipt for $5 for “firewood now in 626 10 Ave.,” and signed, “S. C. Jackson.” Walsh’s name is not mentioned in the receipt. If it can possibly be said that the “firewood” consisted of ice boxes, mahogany bedsteads, and stained glass, this receipt is not sufficient evidence of transfer of title to Walsh. Filkins v. Whyland, 24 N. Y. 338. It appears from the record that the defendant came into possession of the property against his will, and was quite willing to surrender it to any one presenting reasonable proof of ownership. Moreover, there is no evidence that J. C. Jackson ever had any title to the property.

It was error that may very well have been prejudicial to the defendant to permit one Hauley, called by plaintiff as an expert on value, to testify that he offered $125 for the property.

The plaintiff failed to make out a cause of action. The motion to dismiss the complaint should have been granted.

Judgment reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event. All concur.
Exhibit
32(e)








CERTIFICATION
FURNISHED PURSUANT TO




18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,




AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q of Florida Power Corporation (the “Company”) for the period ending
March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the “Report”), I, Jeffrey J. Lyash, President and Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)           the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)           the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.











U/s/ Jeffrey J.
Lyash


Jeffrey
J. Lyash


President
and Chief Executive Officer


May 8,
2009








This
certification is being furnished and shall not be deemed filed by the Company
for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
or incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, or the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
Exhibit
      32.2





**SECTION
      906 CERTIFICATION**





I,
      Dennis
      M. McGrath, Chief Financial Officer of PhotoMedex, Inc., a Delaware corporation
      (the "Company"), do hereby certify, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as created pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





(1)
      the
      accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended
      December 31, 2007 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
      amended; and





(2)
      the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





PHOTOMEDEX,
                INC.Dated:
                March 14, 2008
            By:
            /s/
                Dennis M. McGrathDennis
                M. McGrathChief
                Financial Officer





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002 (“Section 906”), or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or
      otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the
      electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been
      provided to PhotoMedex, Inc. and will be retained by PhotoMedex, Inc. and
      furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.
AVS

Quality Management

System

Title: Domestic New Action Worksheet with 58

QPM#

AIR-ANM-030-F7

Date: December 17, 2008

Revisio:-l,

1

Record of Contacts

~IO-038t.J

FDMSDocketNo.FAA'- -

------

With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed (e.g., ATA, RAA, ALPA, etc.)?

Organization PerSon Contacted Date

Boeing Company Alan Macias 12116109

Boeing Company John Gross I 12116109

AT A 202-626-4125 Mark Lopez t2116109

UNCONTROLLED COPY WHEN DOWNLOADED

Check the Master List to Verify Thai This is the Correct Revision Before Use
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF ACR GROUP, INC. PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of ACR Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K/A2 for the year ending
February 29, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Anthony R. Maresca, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, to my knowledge that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/ Anthony R. MarescaAnthony R. MarescaChief Financial OfficerMay 31, 2005




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section
906, has been provided to ACR Group, Inc. and will be retained by ACR Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to
the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
#### Biscayne-Gallowhur Corporation v. Donald O. Smith et al.

Motion to dismiss appeal granted, with $10 costs, unless the appellants procure the record on appeal and appellants’ points to be served and filed on or before *776September 11, 1962, with notice of argument for the October 1962 Term of this court, said appeal to he argued or submitted when reached. Concur — Rabin, J. P., Valente, McNally, Stevens and Eager, JJ.
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Chase General Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended
September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Barry M. Yantis, President and Chief Executive Officer of Chase General Corporation, do hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Barry M. Yantis                  
|Barry M. Yantis                      
|President and Chief Executive Officer

Dated: November 13, 2007



18
Publications

Appendix Table B1. Northern squawfish electrofishing daily effort and catch results, 1991.

aSampling periods generally began at 2100 h and terminated the following morning about 0900 h.bLocations codes (2 characters): TC - Tanner Creek transect; others Columbia River transects, where 1st character O = Oregon shoreline and W = Washington shoreline; 2nd character, 1-4, transect areas (refer to Fig. 3 for precise locations).cTime that the electrofishing effort began.dTime that the electrofishing unit was powered on.eCPUE = Catch of northern squawfish per unit effort of electrofishing.fSE = Standard error. 

Use your browser's BACK button to return to the text.

Table of Contents
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

**Certification Pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q forthe quarter ended March 31, 2005 (the “Report”) by Cascade Natural GasCorporation (the “Company”), each of the undersigned hereby certifies that:

 

1.                                       TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2.                                       Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 hasbeen provided to Cascade Natural Gas Corporation and will be retained byCascade Natural Gas Corporation and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or staff upon request.

 

 
|   | /s/ David W. Stevens                  |
|--------|---------------------------------------|
|   | David W. Stevens                      |
|   | President and Chief Executive Officer |
|   |                                  |
|   |                                  |
|   | /s/ J. D. Wessling                    |
|   | J.D. Wessling                         |
|   | Chief Financial Officer               |

 

----