alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Norman Gover, Appellant, v. Anne V. Boigeol, as Executrix of Edgar N. Mather, Deceased, Respondent.

Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. (Appeal from judgment of Oswego Trial Term for defendant for no cause of action in an automobile negligence action. The order denied plaintiff’s motion for a new trial.) Present — Bastow, J. P., Goldman, Halpern, McClusky and Henry, JJ.
#### 1852.231-71 [Reserved]
<PAGE>
                                                                         Page 21

EXHIBIT 31.2


                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Michael O. Moore, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and
Secretary of The Cato Corporation, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of The Cato Corporation;

2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
    a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
    statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
    were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
    information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
    the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
    registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.  The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
    establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
    in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

    a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
      disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
      to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
      its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
      prepared;

    b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
      procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
      effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
      the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

    c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
      over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
      fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
      materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
      reporting; and

5.  The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
    most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
    registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
    directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

    a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
      operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
      reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
      process, summarize and report financial information; and

    b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
      over financial reporting.


Date:  December 15, 2003


  /s/  Michael O. Moore
---------------------------------------
Michael O. Moore
Executive Vice President
Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
#### Gerald Goodman et al. v. Solomon Surowitz.

Application denied, with $10 costs. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, McNally and Stevens, JJ.
Case: 1:11-cr-00611 Document #: 3 Filed: 09/09/11 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:28
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Alton Thomas Davis, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

September 27, 2010 

y0920 

Order 

 

September 27, 2010 

141203 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 141203 

 COA: 289088 

Genesee CC: 03-013153-FC 

JOHN MICHAEL CADARETTE, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 20, 2010 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
the Company for the quarter ended
June 30, 2009 (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and(2)
    
    That the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of
the Company.
 Dated: August 12, 2009
    /s/ Robert J. DavisRobert J. DavisChief Financial Officer
237.102 Policy. ( b ) ( 1 ) *Preference for certain commercial services.* See 212.272 for procedures for implementation of the preference for commercial facilities-related services, knowledge-based services (except engineering services), medical services, or transportation services, as required by section 876 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 (Pub. L. 114-328).
( 2 ) *Public-private competitions.* See PGI 207.302 for information on the Governmentwide moratorium and restrictions on public-private competitions conducted pursuant to Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-76.
( c ) In addition to the prohibition on award of contracts for the performance of inherently governmental functions, contracting officers shall not award contracts for functions that are exempt from private sector performance. See 207.503(e) for the associated documentation requirement.
( e ) Program officials shall obtain assistance from contracting officials through the Peer Review process at 201.170.
[73 FR 1826, Jan. 10, 2008, as amended at 74 FR 37626, July 29, 2009; 81 FR 36473, June 7, 2016; 84 FR 39204, Aug. 9, 2019]
Draft for discussion purposes 11.18.13

**U.S. Department of Education**

**1990 K Street, NW, 8th Floor Conference Center**

**Washington, D.C.**

**Gainful Employment Negotiated Rulemaking**

**Committee Meeting 2**

**November 18-20, 2013, 9:00am – 5:00pm**

**AGENDA**

1. **Opening remarks by Jeff Appel, Deputy Under  Secretary, U.S. Department of Education**

2. **Review of September 9-11, 2013 Rulemaking Committee Meeting summary**

3. **Session 2 procedures**

4. **Review of session 2 agenda**

5. **Background for session 2**

6. **Review of Committee work group proposals**

7. **Existing program certification**

8. **New program approval**

9. **Reporting requirements**

10. **Accountability measures, restrictions, and consequences**

11. **Corrections, challenges, and appeals**

12. **Disclosure requirements**

13. **Regulatory conforming changes**

14. **Call for consensus**

15. **Next steps**

16. **Conclusion**
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM (UNAUDITED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2000) AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>       0000017797
<NAME>      Carolina Power & Light Company
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                    6,624,058
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                    474,238
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                       1,293,250
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                       295,214
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                 558,205
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,244,965
<COMMON>                                     1,616,768
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                            0
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                          1,386,300
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>               3,003,068
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     59,334
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                         3,489,512
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                        0
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>               2,693,051
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                9,244,965
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                    2,712,555
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                           292,910
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                   1,982,588
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                   2,275,498
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                        437,057
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                             203,571
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                 640,628
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       154,511
<NET-INCOME>                                   486,117
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                    (2,225)
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                  483,892
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                       240,499
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                      113,172
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         912,551
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00


</TABLE>
231.205-6 Compensation for personal services. ( f ) ( 1 ) In accordance with Section 8122 of Pub. L. 104-61, and similar sections in subsequent Defense appropriations acts, costs for bonuses or other payments in excess of the normal salary paid by the contractor to an employee, that are part of restructuring costs associated with a business combination, are unallowable under DoD contracts funded by fiscal year 1996 or subsequent appropriations. This limitation does not apply to severance payments or early retirement incentive payments. (See 231.205-70(b) for the definitions of “business combination” and “restructuring costs.”)
( m ) ( 1 ) Fringe benefit costs that are contrary to law, employer-employee agreement, or an established policy of the contractor are unallowable.
[57 FR 53600, Nov. 12, 1992, as amended at 58 FR 28469, May 13, 1993; 60 FR 2331, Jan. 9, 1995; 60 FR 61598, Nov. 30, 1995; 61 FR 7077, Feb. 26, 1996; 61 FR 36306, July 10, 1996; 61 FR 50454, Sept. 26, 1996; 61 FR 58490, Nov. 15, 1996; 61 FR 65479, Dec. 13, 1996; 62 FR 63036, Nov. 26, 1997; 63 FR 14641, Mar. 26, 1998; 78 FR 73453, Dec. 6, 2013]
**U.S. Department of Education**

**Retrospective Review Plan Report**

**September 10, 2012**

**September 10, 2012**

The U.S. Department of Education (ED or the Department) submits this report in response to the President’s Executive Order 13610, “Identifying and Reducing Regulatory Burdens,” (EO) directing agencies to report to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) on the status of their retrospective review efforts.  

The EO directs agencies to invite comments from the public on a regular basis about regulations in need of retrospective review, including appropriate modifications to regulations.  The EO also directs agencies, in implementing and revising their retrospective review plans, to give priority to those initiatives that will produce significant quantifiable monetary savings or significant quantifiable reductions in paperwork burden while protecting public health, welfare, safety, and the environment and to give special consideration to those initiatives that would reduce unjustified regulatory burden on small businesses.  In accordance with the EO, the Department is also including in this report (Items 8-9) a description of two initiatives that are anticipated to produce significant quantifiable reductions in paperwork and reporting burdens. 

**Retrospective Review**

**Paperwork and Reporting Burden Initiatives**

9
# Uradni list C 345/2015

| | ISSN 1977-1045 |
| --- | --- |
| Uradni list
  Evropske unije | C 345 |
| | |
| Slovenska izdaja | Informacije in objave | Zvezek 5818. oktober 2015 |

ISSN 1977-1045

Uradni list

Evropske unije

C 345

Slovenska izdaja

Informacije in objave

Zvezek 5818. oktober 2015

---

| Obvestilo št. | Vsebina | Stran |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Informacije |
| | INFORMACIJE INSTITUCIJ, ORGANOV, URADOV IN AGENCIJ EVROPSKE UNIJE |
| | Svet |
| 2015/C 345/01 | Izjava Sveta | 1 |

Obvestilo št.

Vsebina

Stran

IV   Informacije

INFORMACIJE INSTITUCIJ, ORGANOV, URADOV IN AGENCIJ EVROPSKE UNIJE

Svet

2015/C 345/01

Izjava Sveta

1

---

| SL | |
| --- | --- |

SL

---

IV Informacije

INFORMACIJE INSTITUCIJ, ORGANOV, URADOV IN AGENCIJ EVROPSKE UNIJE

Svet

| 18.10.2015 | SL | Uradni list Evropske unije | C 345/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.10.2015

SL

Uradni list Evropske unije

C 345/1

---

IZJAVA SVETA

(2015/C 345/01)

Svet opozarja, da zaveza v skladu s skupnim celovitim načrtom ukrepanja, da se odpravijo vse sankcije EU, povezane z jedrskim vprašanjem, ne posega v mehanizem za reševanje sporov, določen v skupnem celovitem načrtu ukrepanja, in v možnost ponovne uvedbe sankcij EU, če Iran v znatnem obsegu ne bi izpolnil svojih zavez iz skupnega celovitega načrta ukrepanja.

Svet se zavezuje, da bo na podlagi skupnega priporočila, ki ga Svetu dajo visoki predstavnik Evropske unije za zunanje zadeve in varnostno politiko, Francija, Nemčija in Združeno kraljestvo, nemudoma ponovno uvedel vse sankcije EU, ki so povezane z jedrskim vprašanjem ter so začasno ukinjene in/ali odpravljene, če Iran v znatnem obsegu ne bi izpolnil svojih zavez iz skupnega celovitega načrta ukrepanja.

---
#### 2009.406 Debarment.
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    This quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company
for the quarter ended December 31, 2009 (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and(2)
    
    The information contained in this Form 10-Q fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Dated: February 11, 2010
    /s/ Mark A. LibratoreMark A. LibratorePresident and Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                          <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              12-MOS                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1996             JUN-30-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1996             JUN-30-1995
<CASH>                                         102,223                 116,891
<SECURITIES>                                     4,923<F2>               4,651
<RECEIVABLES>                                   98,245                  67,997
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (37,000)                (37,000)
<INVENTORY>                                    221,866<F1>             718,388
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               390,257                 870,927
<PP&E>                                       1,495,134               1,166,840
<DEPRECIATION>                                 968,315                 865,222
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,196,849               1,342,992
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          345,229                 180,747
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                     5,673,512               5,661,812
<OTHER-SE>                                    (46,754)<F3>            (46,754)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,196,849               1,342,992
<SALES>                                        334,578               1,156,226
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               448,574               1,206,279
<CGS>                                           53,782                 178,687
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  770,899               1,098,041
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (322,325)                 108,238
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (322,325)                 108,238
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (322,325)                 108,238
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.08)                     .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.08)                     .03
<FN>
<F2>PrePaid Expense
<F1>Precious Metals
<F3>Treasury Stock
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
On April 9, 2014, OCR  resolved a proactive compliance review initiated against the Manchester School District (School Administrative Unit #37) in New Hampshire.  OCR examined whether the school district discriminated against black and Latino students on the basis of race or national origin by establishing policies and procedures that result in excluding these students from its higher-level programs and courses,  including honors and Advanced Placement (AP) courses and dual enrollment programs that offer college credit through local post-secondary institutions.  Before OCR completed its investigation, the District  voluntarily resolved this case, agreeing to take specific steps to ensure that all students are provided with equal access and an equal opportunity to participate in the identified courses and programs.

Read the Press Release | *Read    the Resolution Letter*MS WORD (82K) PDF (224K) | *Readthe Resolution Agreement*MS WORD (36K) PDF (209K)

 

Top
#### 22.103-2 Policy.

Contractors shall perform all contracts, so far as practicable, without using overtime, particularly as a regular employment practice, except when lower overall costs to the Government will result or when it is necessary to meet urgent program needs. Any approved overtime, extra-pay shifts, and multishifts should be scheduled to achieve these objectives.
227.7102-4 Contract clauses. ( a ) ( 1 ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, use the clause at 252.227-7015, Technical Data—Commercial Products and Commercial Services, in solicitations and contracts, including solicitations and contracts using FAR part 12 procedures for the acquisition of commercial products and commercial services, when the contractor will be required to deliver technical data pertaining to commercial products, commercial components, commercial services, or commercial processes.
( 2 ) Use the clause at 252.227-7015 with its Alternate I in solicitations and contracts, including solicitations and contracts using FAR part 12 procedures for the acquisition of commercial products and commercial services, for the development or delivery of a vessel design or any useful article embodying a vessel design.
( b ) In accordance with the clause prescription at 227.7103-6(a), use the clause at 252.227-7013, Rights in Technical Data- Other Than Commercial Products and Commercial Services, in addition to the clause at 252.227-7015, if the Government will have paid for any portion of the development costs of a commercial item. The clause at 252.227-7013 will govern the technical data pertaining to any portion of a commercial product or commercial service that was developed in any part at Government expense, and the clause at 252.227-7015 will govern the technical data pertaining to any portion of a commercial item that was developed exclusively at private expense.
( c ) Use the clause at 252.227-7037, Validation of Restrictive Markings on Technical Data, in solicitations and contracts using FAR part 12 procedures for the acquisition of commercial products and commercial services that include the clause at 252.227-7015 or the clause at 252.227-7013.
[76 FR 58147, Sept. 20, 2011, as amended at 78 FR 37988, June 25, 2013; 88 FR 6586, Jan. 31, 2023]
IIA 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 27 

Disapproving the rule submitted by the Department of Labor relating to 

‘‘Clarification of Employer’s Continuing Obligation to Make and Maintain 

an Accurate Record of Each Recordable Injury and Illness’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 2, 2017 

Mr. CASSIDY (for himself, Mr. HATCH, Mr. ISAKSON, and Mr. DAINES) introduced the following joint resolution; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Disapproving the rule submitted by the Department of Labor 

relating to ‘‘Clarification of Employer’s Continuing Obligation to Make and Maintain an Accurate Record of 

Each Recordable Injury and Illness’’. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the De4 partment of Labor relating to ‘‘Clarification of Employer’s 

5 Continuing Obligation to Make and Maintain an Accurate 

6 Record of Each Recordable Injury and Illness’’ (published 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•SJ 27 IS 

1 at 81 Fed. Reg. 91792 (December 19, 2016)), and such 

2 rule shall have no force or effect. 

Æ 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA
No. 5 05P A1 0
FILED 27 JUNE 2013
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA

v. DAVID FRANKLIN HURT

On discretionary review pursuant to N.C.G.S. ' 7A

- 31 of a unanimous decision of the Court of Appeals, 208 N.C. App. 1 , 70 2 S.E.2d 82 (201 0 ), finding prejudicial error in a judgment entered on 4 April 200 8 by Judge Thomas D. Haigwood in Superior Court, Caldwell County , and remanding for a new sentencing
trial . Heard in the Supreme Court on 12 February 2013

. Roy Cooper, Attorney General, by Daniel P. O’Brien , Assistant Attorney General, for the State

- appellant. Staples S. Hughes, Appellate Defender, by Barbara S. Blackman , Assistant Appella te Defender, for defendant

- appellee.

PER CURIAM.

For the reasons stated in State v. Ortiz

- Zape , ___ N.C. ___, ___, ___ S.E.2d ___, ___ (2013), the decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed. The case is remanded for consideration of the remaining issues on appeal.
REVERSED AND REMANDED

.

Chief Justice PARKER and Justice HUDSON dissent for the reasons stated in Justice Hudson’s dissenting opinions in State v. Ortiz

- Zape , ___ N.C. ___, ___S TATE V

. H URT
Opinion of the Court

- 2

- S.E .2d ___ (2013) (329PA11) and State v. Brewington , ___ N.C. ___, ___ S.E.2d ___ (2013) (235PA10).
Justice BEASLEY did not participate in the consideration or decision of this

case.