alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
225.7003-5 Solicitation provision and contract clauses. ( a ) Unless the acquisition is wholly exempt from the specialty metals restrictions at 225.7003-2 because the acquisition is covered by an exception in 225.7003-3(a) or (d) (but see paragraph (d) of this section)— ( 1 ) Use the clause at 252.225-7008, Restriction on Acquisition of Specialty Metals, in solicitations and contracts, including solicitations and contracts using FAR part 12 procedures for the acquisition of commercial products and commercial services, that— ( i ) Exceed the simplified acquisition threshold; and
( ii ) Require the delivery of specialty metals as end items.
( 2 ) Use the clause at 252.225-7009, Restriction on Acquisition of Certain Articles Containing Specialty Metals, in solicitations and contracts, including solicitations and contracts using FAR part 12 procedures for the acquisition of commercial products and commercial services, that— ( i ) Exceed the simplified acquisition threshold; and
( ii ) Require delivery of any of the following items, or components of the following items, if such items or components contain specialty metal: ( A ) Aircraft.
( B ) Missile or space systems.
( C ) Ships.
( D ) Tank or automotive items.
( E ) Weapon systems.
( F ) Ammunition.
( b ) Use the provision at 252.225-7010, Commercial Derivative Military Article—Specialty Metals Compliance Certificate, in solicitations, including solicitations using FAR part 12 procedures for the acquisition of commercial products and commercial services— ( 1 ) That contain the clause at 252.225-7009; and
( 2 ) For which the contracting officer anticipates that one or more offers of commercial derivative military articles may be received.
( c ) If an agency cannot reasonably determine at time of acquisition whether some or all of the items will be used in support of combat operations or in support of contingency operations, the contracting officer should not rely on the exception at 225.7003-3(a)(2) or (3), but should include the appropriate specialty metals clause or provision in the solicitation and contract.
( d ) If the solicitation and contract require delivery of a variety of contract line items containing specialty metals, but only some of the items are subject to domestic specialty metals restrictions, identify in the Schedule those items that are subject to the restrictions.
[74 FR 37636, July 29, 2009; 75 FR 48280, Aug. 10, 2010; 78 FR 37987, June 25, 2013; 88 FR 6584, Jan. 31, 2023]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF CASCADE NATURAL GAS CORPORATION
INCLUDED IN THE QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31,
1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      280,094
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                      1,442
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                          43,967
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                         8,455
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 333,958
<COMMON>                                        11,045
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                       97,380
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                             12,233
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 120,658
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            6,186
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           125,000
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                   5,000
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                        0
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                  77,114
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  333,958
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      134,035
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                             8,864
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     105,192
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     105,192
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                         28,843
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                   0
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                  19,979
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         5,206
<NET-INCOME>                                    14,773
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        241
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                   14,532
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                         5,302
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                            0
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                          16,868
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.32
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.32
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit
      23.1




**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM INDEPENDENT**


**AUDITORS’
      CONSENT**




The
      Board
      of Directors


PhotoMedex,
      Inc. and Subsidiaries:





We
      hereby
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the Form 10-K for the year ended
      December 31, 2006, the registration statements (Nos. 333-58450, 333-72580,
      333-91926, 333-106605 (and amendment 1), 333-120921, 333-132654 and 333-139031)
      on Form S-3, in the registration statements (Nos. 333-100609 and 333-121864)
      on
      Form S-4, and in the registration statements (Nos. 333-30298 and 333-114181)
      on
      Form S-8 of PhotoMedex, Inc. of our report dated March 8, 2007, relating to
      the
      consolidated financial statements, management’s assessment of the effectiveness
      of internal controls over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal
      controls over financial reporting, which appear in this Form 10-K.








/s/
      Amper, Politziner & Mattia, P. C.





Edison,
      New Jersey


March
      15,
      2007
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 23-0225

_________________

MONTANA ENVIRONMENTAL 

INFORMATION 

CENTER and SIERRA CLUB,

 Plaintiffs and Appellees and CrossAppellants,

 v.

MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF 

ENVIRONMENTAL 

QUALITY AND NORTHWESTERN ENERGY, 

INC.,

 Defendants, Appellants and CrossAppellees,

STATE OF MONTANA, by and through

the OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL,

 Intervenor-Defendant.

O R D E R

_________________

This Court reviews briefs to ensure compliance with the Montana Rules of 

Appellate Procedure. After reviewing the Appellant/Cross-Appellee Montana 

Department of Environmental Quality’s combined reply brief and answer to cross-appeal

filed electronically on November 13, 2023, this Court has determined that the brief does 

not comply with the below-referenced Rules and must be resubmitted. 

M. R. App. P. 12(3) provides that an “appellant may file a brief in reply to the 

brief of the appellee.” The Rule further provides that the M. R. App. P. 11(4) “word or 

page limit for reply briefs applies even if the reply brief also contains a response to a 

cross-appeal.” M. R. App. P. 11(4)(a) provides that reply briefs, including those “which 

also answer a cross-appellant’s principal brief,” “shall not exceed 5,000 words.”

Appellant/Cross-Appellee certifies its combination reply and answer brief is 

“7,362 words.” The brief is overlength and must be resubmitted.

11/14/2023
Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that the referenced brief is rejected. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that within ten (10) days of the date of this Order the 

Appellant/Cross-Appellee shall electronically file with the Clerk of this Court a revised 

brief containing the revisions necessary to comply with the specified Rules and shall 

serve copies of the revised brief on all parties of record;

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no changes, additions, or deletions other than 

those specified in this Order may be made to the brief as originally filed; and

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the times for any subsequent briefing contained 

in M. R. App. P. 13 shall run from the date of filing of the revised brief.

The Clerk is directed to provide a true copy of this Order to the Appellant/CrossAppellee and all parties of record. 

Electronically signed by:

Dirk Sandefur

Justice, Montana Supreme Court

November 14 2023
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

WESTERN DIVISION

WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL 

ASSOCIATION AS INDENTURE 

TRUSTEE OF THE FIELDSTONE 

MORTGAGE INVESTMENT TRUST, 

SERIES 2007-1,

 Plaintiff,

V.

STEPHANIE M FIORE; MERS INC AS 

NOMINEE FOR FIELDSTONE 

MORTGAGE COMPANY,

 Defendant(s).

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No: 3:12-cv-50172

Judge: Hon. Frederick J. Kapala

MOTION FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT OF FORECLOSURE NUNC PRO TUNC

NOW COMES the Plaintiff, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION 

AS INDENTURE TRUSTEE OF THE FIELDSTONE MORTGAGE INVESTMENT 

TRUST, SERIES 2007-1, by and through its attorney, Megan Christine Adams, and moves this 

Honorable Court for Entry of Judgment of Foreclosure nunc pro tunc October 5, 2012. In 

support thereof, Plaintiff states as follows:

1. On May 12, 2012 Plaintiff filed its Complaint to Foreclose Mortgage.

2. On October 5, 2012 the Court granted Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment and the 

minute entry stated “Enter... judgment of foreclosure.” [ECF #17]

3. For reasons unknown, a Judgment of Foreclosure was never entered.

4. Therefore, Plaintiff seeks a Judgment of Foreclosure so that Plaintiff may proceed with 

the sale of this foreclosed property.

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully requests that a Judgment of Foreclosure be entered 

nunc pro tunc October 5, 2012. Plaintiff will provide a draft order reflecting the figures 

contained in the affidavits already on the record. [ECF #13-2, 13-3].

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Megan Christine Adams (ARDC#6312221)

Potestivo & Associates, P.C.

223 West Jackson Blvd, suite 610

Chicago, IL 60601

(312)263-0003
#### 225.873-1 Policy.

DoD and the Government of the United Kingdom (U.K.) have agreed to waive U.K. commercial exploitation levies and U.S. nonrecurring cost recoupment charges on a reciprocal basis. For U.K. levies to be waived, the offeror or contractor shall identify the levies and the contracting officer shall request a waiver before award of the contract or subcontract under which the levies are charged.
The Office of the Chief Privacy Officer (OCPO) provides the following links to external websites for informational purposes only as a public service.

*Disclaimer of Endorsement:*The  documents posted on this page contain hypertext links or pointers to  information created and maintained by other public and private organizations.  These links and pointers are provided for the user's convenience. OCPO does not control or  guarantee the accuracy, relevance, timeliness, or completeness of this outside  information.  Further, the inclusion of links or pointers to particular items in  hypertext is not intended to reflect their importance, nor is it intended to  endorse any views expressed, or products or services offered, on these outside  sites, or the organizations sponsoring the sites.

FPCO | FOIA |  PSD | RDMD | ICCD

### Family Policy Compliance Office (FPCO)

- Family  Educational Rights & Privacy Act (FERPA)
- Family Policy Compliance Office at ED
- FAQs
- Protection of Pupil Rights Amendment (PPRA)
- Hot Topics
- Court  Cases
- Training Partners

Top

### Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Service Center 

-  FOIA at ED    - FOIA Plan and Status Reports
  - Annual FOIA  Report FY2012   PDF (1.28MB )    - ED FOIA  Regulations 
- Open  Government Plan
- Archived Annual  Reports
- Chief  FOIA Officer's Report 2013  PDF (332K)
- Attorney General  Holder's FOIA Memo
- FOIA.gov
- DOJ FOIA Guide

### Privacy Safeguards Division (PSD)

- Privacy Impact Assessments  (PIA)
- Privacy Act System of Record Notice (SORN) Issuances
- Computer Matching Agreements (CMA)
- Privacy Safeguards at ED

### Records and Documents Management Division (RDMD) 

- ED's Records  Disposition Schedules
- Records and Documents Management at ED
- Open Government  Plan

### Information Collection Clearance Division (ICCD)

- Pending Collections
- Active Collections

Top

Home  | Leadership | Organization | Outreach | Other Useful Links| FOIA | FPCO |
22.406-12 Cooperation with the Department of Labor. ( a ) The contracting agency shall cooperate with representatives of the Department of Labor in the inspection of records, interviews with workers, and all other aspects of investigations undertaken by the Department of Labor. When requested, the contracting agency shall furnish to the Secretary of Labor any available information on contractors, subcontractors, current and previous contracts, and the nature of the contract work.
( b ) If a Department of Labor representative undertakes an investigation at a construction project, the contracting officer shall inquire into the scope of the investigation, and request to be notified immediately of any violations discovered under the Construction Wage Rate Requirements statute, the Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards statute, or the Copeland (Anti-Kickback) Act.
[53 FR 4935, Feb. 18, 1988, as amended at 79 FR 24204, Apr. 29, 2014]
#### Jones *et al. v.*Bass & Company.

April 18, 1913.

Claim. Before Judge Maddox. Floyd superior court, October *24,*1911.

*Henry Walicer,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Lipscomb, Willingham*<£• *Wright*and *Nathan Harris,*contra.

Beck, J.

Under the provisions of the Civil Code, § 4915, the sheriff or deputy sheriff is authorized to levy a fl. fa. issued from a justice’s court. This disposes of the only ruling made in the trial upon which error is assigned.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
214.201-5 Part IV—Representations and instructions. ( c ) Include an evaluation factor regarding supply chain risk (see subpart 239.73) when acquiring information technology, whether as a service or as a supply, that is a covered system, is a part of a covered system, or is in support of a covered system, as defined in 239.7301.
[80 FR 67251, Oct. 30, 2015]
216.401 General. ( c ) See PGI 216.401(c) for information on the Defense Acquisition University Award and Incentive Fees Community of Practice.
( d ) The determination and findings justifying that the use of an incentive- or award-fee contract is in the best interest of the Government, may be signed by the head of contracting activity or a designee— ( i ) No lower than one level below the head of the contracting activity for award-fee contracts; or
( ii ) One level above the contracting officer for incentive-fee contracts.
( e ) Award-fee plans required in FAR 16.401(e) shall be incorporated into all award-fee type contracts. Follow the procedures at PGI 216.401(e) when planning to award an award-fee contract.
[75 FR 78619, Dec. 16, 2010, as amended at 76 FR 8305, Feb. 14, 2011, 84 FR 65307, Nov. 27, 2019; 87 FR 65513, Oct. 28, 2022]
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 13 (Friday, January 22, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 6651]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-01360]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

UNITED STATES AGENCY FOR GLOBAL MEDIA


USAGM Performance Review Board Members

AGENCY: United States Agency for Global Media.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The United States Agency for Global Media (USAGM) announces 
the members of its SES Performance Review Board (PRB).

ADDRESSES: USAGM Office of Human Resources, 330 Independence Ave SW, 
Washington, DC 20237

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ellona Fritschie, Business Review 
Coordinator, at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6b0e0d19021f180803020e2b1e180a0c06450c041d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="1f7a796d766b6c7c77767a5f6a6c7e787231787069">[email protected]</span></a> or (202) 382-7500.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 4314, USAGM 
publishes this notice announcing the individuals who will serve as 
members of the PRB for a term of one year. The PRB is responsible for: 
(1) Reviewing performance appraisals and ratings of Senior Executive 
Service and Senior Level members; and (2) making recommendations on 
other performance management issues, such as pay adjustments, bonuses, 
and Presidential Rank Awards. The names, position titles, and 
appointment types of each member of the PRB are set forth below:
    1. James Reeves, Chief Information Officer, Career SES
    2. Terry Balazs, Director of Technology, Services, and Innovation, 
Career SES
    3. Gary Thatcher, Associate Director for Program Support, Career 
SES
    4. Kelu Chao, Director for Language Programming, Voice of America, 
Career SES

    Dated: January 14, 2021.
Daniel Rosenhotlz,
Attorney-Advisor, Policy Officer, U.S. Agency for Global Media.
[FR Doc. 2021-01360 Filed 1-21-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8610-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
1 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

EASTERN DIVISION 

JAMIL C. GRAYER, ) 

 ) 

Plaintiff, ) 

 ) 

v. ) No.: 12-CV-02665 

 ) 

CHICAGO POLICE OFFICER JORGE ) 

CERDA, STAR NO. 10607; CHICAGO POLICE ) 

OFFICER RYAN DELANEY, STAR NO. 4024; ) 

CHICAGO POLICE OFFICER SERGIO ) 

CORONA, STAR NO. 3331; CHICAGO ) 

POLICE OFFICER M. KUSHINER, STAR ) JUDGE MAROVICH 

NO. 15895, CHICAGO POLICE OFFICER W. ) 

JOHNSON, STAR NO. 17442; CHICAGO ) 

POLICE OFFICER JAVIER ZAMBRANO, ) 

STAR NO. 5475, individually and as employees/ ) 

Agents of the CITY OF CHICAGO, a municipal ) 

Corporation and THE CITY OF CHICAGO, ) JURY DEMAND 

 ) 

Defendants. ) 

AGREED MOTION TO EXTEND DISCOVERY 

NOW COMES the Plaintiff, JAMIL C. GRAYER, by and through his attorneys, 

MICHAEL D. ROBBINS & ASSOCIATES and LAW OFFICES OF JEFFREY J. NESLUND, and 

in support of his agreed motion to extend discovery, Plaintiff states as follows: 

 1. The discovery cut off in this case is set for June 20, 2013. There has been one prior 

extension of discovery. 

 2. The depositions of the Defendant Officers were previously scheduled for February 

6, 7, and 11, 2013; then again for March 6, 7 and 8, 2013; and May 14 and 29, 2013. However due 

to personal reasons, the Defendant Offices were not able to attend their scheduled depositions. 

Case: 1:12-cv-02665 Document #: 38 Filed: 05/22/13 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:154
2 

 3. The Plaintiff’s attorneys are scheduled to begin a trial before the Honorable Judge 

Thomas Durkin in the matter of Edison Torres v. CPO Jackson, et al., case number 11-CV-4498, 

which will begin on June 3, 2013. 

 4. Both counsel for the Plaintiff and Defendants were also involved in a weeklong trial 

before the Honorable Judge Rebecca Pallmeyer in the matter of Julian Morgan v. City of Chicago, 

et al., case number 10 CV 4138, the week of April 15, 2013. 

 5. The parties are in agreement that, given counsels’ respective schedules, additional 

time to depose the parties and Plaintiff’s witnesses is required. 

 6. This request is not made to delay the proceedings; rather it is made in the interest 

of justice and so as to afford the parties effective representation. 

 7. The undersigned has conferred with counsel for Defendants and has been advised 

that they agree to this Motion to Extend Discovery.

 WHEREFORE, for the reasons stated above, Plaintiff respectfully requests this 

Honorable court for entry of an order extending the discovery for 90 days, to and including 

September 18, 2013. 

 Respectfully submitted, 

 /s/ Jeffrey J. Neslund

 Jeffrey J. Neslund 

 One of the Attorneys for Plaintiff 

Michael D. Robbins 

Michael D. Robbins & Associates 

20 N. Wacker Drive, Suite 3710 

Chicago, Illinois 60606 

(312) 899-8000 

Jeffrey J. Neslund 

Law Offices of Jeffrey J. Neslund 

20 N. Wacker Drive, Suite 3710 

Chicago, Illinois 60606 

(312) 223-1100 

Case: 1:12-cv-02665 Document #: 38 Filed: 05/22/13 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:155
#### In the Matter of Michael M. Suffolk County Department of Social Services, Respondent; Michael M., Appellant. (Proceeding No. 1.) In the Matter of James M. Suffolk County Department of Social Services, Respondent; Michael M., Appellant. (Proceeding No. 2.)

[833 NYS2d 395]

In related proceedings pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, the father appeals from an order of fact-finding and disposition of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Freundlich, J.), dated July 21, 2006, which, after a hearing, inter alia, found that he had neglected the subject children and placed him under the supervision of the Suffolk County Department of Social Services until May 10, 2007.

Ordered that on the Court’s own motion, the notice of appeal from a decision of the same court dated May 14, 2006, is deemed a premature notice of appeal from the order of fact-finding and disposition dated July 21, 2006 *(see*CPLR 5520 [c]); and it is further,

Ordered that the order of fact-finding and disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Where the Family Court is confronted primarily with issues of credibility, its factual findings must be accorded great weight on appeal *(Matter of Angel Marie L.,*5 AD3d 773, 774 [2004]; *Matter of Commissioner of Social Servs. of City of N.Y. v Ivan G.,*226 AD2d 529 [1996]). Here, the findings of neglect were supported by a preponderance of the credible evidence *(see*Family Ct Act § 1046 [b] [i]; *Matter of Joseph O.,*28 AD3d 562, 563 [2006]; *Matter of Sheneika V.,*20 AD3d 541, 542 [2005]; *Matter of Dutchess County Dept. of Social Servs. [Noreen K.],*242 AD2d 533 [1997]; *Matter of C. Children,*207 AD2d 888 [1994]; *Matter*
      *551
      *of I. Children,*191 AD2d 699 [1993]). Santucci, J.P., Krausman, Lifson and Dillon, JJ., concur.