alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
The Department identified three Agency Priority Goals (APGs) for fiscal year (FY) 2022 and FY 2023 that reflect the top implementation-focused performance improvement priorities of Department leadership and the Administration and are consistent with the FY 2022 -2026 Strategic Plan. The APGs, which are aligned to the national priority to advance educational equity, focus on addressing the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, effectively managing federal student loans, and reducing disparities in attainment of high-quality degrees and credentials.

**Address the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on students, educators, and faculty: The Department will be a leader and partner in addressing the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in educational areas.**

By September 30, 2023, the Department will respond to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and the need to continuously provide for high-quality educational environments and capabilities by supporting state educational agencies, local educational agencies, and institutions of higher education to:

- Continue to support schools in maintaining safe, fully in-person instructions for students.
- Utilize COVID-19 relief funds on appropriate, effective, and evidence-based activities to reengage students, address lost instructional time, and improve educational opportunities by offering 300+ Department-led technical assistance engagements.

**Effectively manage federal student loans: The Department will provide effective customer service for borrowers to simplify the student loan repayment process.**

By September 30, 2023, Federal Student Aid will improve loan servicer quality and accuracy to levels at or above 95 percent, as defined in student loan servicer agreements.

**Reduce disparities in attainment of high-quality degrees and credentials: The Department will support institutions and states to assist low-income students and students of color to enroll in and complete high-quality postsecondary education programs, including at community colleges and through career and technical training.**

By September 30, 2023, the Department will increase the number and diversity of higher education grant applicants from community colleges, Historically Black Colleges and Universities, Tribally Controlled Colleges or Universities, Minority-Serving Institutions, and public four-year colleges by 5 percent to support and assist low-income students and students of color in attaining improved educational outcomes.

For more information on the Department's FYs 2022-2023 Agency Priority Goals, please go to Performance.gov.
U.S. Department 

of Transportation 

Federal Aviation 

Administration 

DEC 2 3 2015 

Mr. Douglas M. Lane 

Director, Commercial Airplanes 

The Boeing Company 

PO Box 3707 

Seattle, Washington 98124-2207 

Dear Mr. Lane: 

Transport Airplane Directorate 

1601 Lind Avenue, S.W. 

Renton, Washington 98057-3356 

We have received your petition letter dated November 18, 2015, requesting exemption from 

§ 25.981(a)(3), Amendment 25-125, ofTitle 14, Code ofFederal Regulations. This 

exemption, if granted, would provide certain relief from the requirements of fuel tank 

structural lightning protection for the Boeing 777-9 model airplane. 

This request was posted to the Department of Transportation's Federal Docket Management 

System (at Regulations.gov) on December 16,2015, and has been assigned Docket No. 

FAA-2015-8006. We are in the process of reviewing your request, and will contact you if 

we need additional information. 

A summary of your petition will be published in the Federal Register for public comment, in 

accordance with the requirements of§ 11.85. You will be advised of the agency's decision 

on your petition as soon as possible. 

If you have any questions or concerns regarding your petition or the petition process, please 

contact Mike Dostert at (425) 227-2132, or by e-mail at Mike.Dostert@FAA.gov. 

Sincerely, 

J~~-~ 

Deana M. Stedman 

Transport Airplane Directorate 

Aircraft Certification Service
223.7304 Exceptions. The prohibition in 223.7303 does not apply to— ( a ) Legacy systems and their related parts, subsystems, and components that already contain hexavalent chromium. However, alternatives to hexavalent chromium shall be considered by the appropriate official during system modifications, follow-on procurements of legacy systems, or maintenance procedure updates; and
( b ) Additional sustainment related contracts (e.g., parts, services) for a system in which use of hexavalent chromium was previously approved.
<PAGE>

                                                                 EXHIBIT 10.14.1


        AMENDMENT TO THE FOUNDER STOCK REPURCHASE AND VESTING AGREEMENT



     This FIRST AMENDMENT to the FOUNDER STOCK REPURCHASE AND VESTING AGREEMENT
(the "First Amendment") is dated April __, 2000 by and among PARADIGM GENETICS,
INC., a DELAWARE corporation (the "Company"), and JORN GORLACH (the "Founder").

                                  WITNESSETH:

     WHEREAS, the Company and the Founder entered into the Founder Stock
Repurchase and Vesting Agreement dated as of February 12, 1998;

     WHEREAS, the Company and the Founder agree to amend the Founder Stock
Repurchase and Vesting Agreement in order to revise certain provisions therein;
and

     NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the mutual covenants
set forth herein, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and
sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto, intending to
be legally bound, hereby amend the Founder Stock Repurchase and Vesting
Agreement and agree as follows:

     1.   The conditions of "Termination of Repurchase Rights" set forth
specifically in Section 5.3(a)(iii) is hereby deleted and replaced with the
following:

     "(iii) Upon the closing of a firm commitment underwritten public offering
     pursuant to an effective registration statement under the 1933 Act covering
     the offer and sale of the Company's Common Stock at a price per share of
     not less than $6.00 (as adjusted for stock splits and the like effected
     after the date of this Agreement) and an aggregate offering price to the
     public of not less than $20,000,000, the Founder shall acquire a vested
     interest in, and the Repurchase Right shall lapse with respect to, the
     Unvested Shares as of such closing."

     2.  This First Amendment shall be governed by and construed in accordance
with the laws of the State of Delaware, without giving effect to its conflicts
of law provisions.

     This First Amendment may be executed in multiple counterparts.



                                       1
<PAGE>

     Executed as of the date above written.


PARADIGM GENETICS, INC.:
------------------------


By: _____________________________
Name: __________________________
Title: ___________________________




FOUNDER
-------




_________________________________
Jorn Gorlach



                                       2
1

Subject: RE: Additional questions for ED

From: Chip Cameron [mailto:fxcameo@ 

Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2013 12:13 PM 

To: Kolotos, John 

Cc: Mahaffie, Lynn; Wilson, Amy; charlie pou 

Subject: Fwd: Additional questions for ED 

John: 

I hope you had a good conversation with Jenny and Tom. I am forwarding an email from Sandra Kinney 

(alternate, State higher education officers) requesting information from the Department on a number of 

issues. Sandra believes that others on the negotiating committee would like the same information. Let me 

know how you want to handle this. Thanks. 

Chip 

---------- Forwarded message ---------- 

From: Sandra Kinney <sandra.kinney@

Date: Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 10:18 AM 

Subject: Additional questions for ED 

To: Chip Cameron <fxcameo@

Chip, 

 

For further clarification, can ED provide answers to the following questions before our next meeting? I am sure 

others may have similar questions. 

 

1. Will ED provide updated program DTE estimates? The data spreadsheet received in August had significant 

errors, such as including non-GE programs and total number of failing or zone programs that did not match ED 

summaries. 

 

2. Please provide clarification on how the "borrower relief" provisions would function for pCDRs. Whose 

debt, and how much, would be paid down based on the repayment and default of previous participants? 

 

3. Borrower relief provisions are intended to prosepectively protect program participants based on high levels 

of indebtedness and expected loss of program aid eligibility, and nearly all metrics allow institutions to "fail" 

more than once before these relief provisions take effect. However, pCDRs allow immediate loss of eligibility 

with a single pCDR of 40% or more. Would institutions need to provide borrower relief as a form of liability 

for this pCDR sanction level? 

 

4. Please provide clarification regarding the length and process of tracking repayment performance 

cohorts. The cohort is described as students entering repyament over a two-year period. Are these cohorts 

distinct or overlapping? And are the balances tracked in perpetuity until 

no balance remains, or for a fixed period of time? Please describe how this would be calculated each year. 

 
2

-- 

Sandra Kinney
#### 217.7100 Scope of subpart.

This subpart contains acquisition policies and procedures for master agreements for repair and alteration of vessels.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the National Institute of Nursing Research Special Emphasis Panel, February 19, 2021, 10:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m., 6701 Democracy Blvd., Democracy One, Bethesda, MD 20892, which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on January 14, 2021, 86 FR 3163.                

The NINR Special Emphasis Panel meeting is being amended due to a change in the meeting time. This meeting held on February 19, 2021 will now start at 2:00 p.m. and will adjourn at 4:00 p.m. The meeting is closed to the public.

Dated: January 21, 2021.

Melanie J. Pantoja,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2021-01704 Filed 1-26-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
Case: 1:12-cv-01888 Document #: 21 Filed: 10/30/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:156
-1- 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

COURT OF APPEALS 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

 Plaintiff-Appellant, 

UNPUBLISHED 

June 16, 2016 

v No. 328740 

Mackinac Circuit Court 

RICHARD ALLAN MCKENZIE, JR., LC No. 15-003602 

 Defendant-Appellee. 

Before: MARKEY, P.J., and OWENS and BOONSTRA, JJ. 

BOONSTRA (concurring). 

 I fully concur in the majority opinion, and additionally incorporate the reasoning set forth 

in my concurring in part and dissenting in part opinion in People v Henry (After Remand), 305 

Mich App 127, 163-191; 854 NW2d 114 (2014) (BOONSTRA, J., concurring in part and 

dissenting in part). 

/s/ Mark T. Boonstra
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

NICK PEARSON, FRANCISCO 

PADILLA, CECILIA LINARES, 

AUGUSTINA BLANCO, ABEL 

GONZALEZ, and RICHARD JENNINGS, 

individually and on behalf of all others 

similarly situated; 

 Plaintiffs, 

v. 

NBTY, INC., a Delaware Corporation; and 

REXALL SUNDOWN, INC., a Florida 

Corporation; TARGET CORPORATION, 

a Minnesota Corporation, 

 Defendants. 

___________________________________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

11 CV 07972 

Judge James Zagel 

NOTICE OF APPEAL 

Notice is hereby given that Objectors Kathleen McNeal and Alison Paul hereby 

appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit from the Final 

Judgment and Order (Docket No. 144) entered in this action on the January 22, 2014, and 

Memorandum Opinion and Order (Docket No. 143), entered in this action on January 3, 

2014. 

Dated: February 21, 2014 LAW OFFICES OF DARRELL PALMER PC

By: /s/ Joseph Darrell Palmer

Joseph Darrell Palmer

Law Offices of Darrell Palmer PC

2244 Faraday Avenue, Suite 121

Carlsbad, CA 92008 

Phone: 858-215-4064

Fax: 866-583-8115 

Email: Darrell.palmer@palmerlegalteam.com

Attorney for Objectors Kathleen McNeal and 

Alison Paul 

Case: 1:11-cv-07972 Document #: 175 Filed: 02/21/14 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:3207
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on February 21, 2014, I electronically filed the foregoing 

with the Clerk of the Court of the United States District Court for the Northern District of 

Illinois by using the USDC CM/ECF system. 

I certify that all participants in the case who are registered CM/ECF users that 

service will be accomplished by the USDC CM/ECF system. 

___/s/ Joseph Darrell Palmer____ 

Joseph Darrell Palmer

Attorney for Objectors

Case: 1:11-cv-07972 Document #: 175 Filed: 02/21/14 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:3208
U.S. FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE

Oxbow National Wildlife Refuge

Route 2 - South Waterfowl Hunt Map

0 187.5 375 750 1,125 1,500

Meters

0 0.125 0.25 0.5 0.75 1

Miles

Legend

Parking

Refuge Boundary

Wildlife Trails

Waterfowl Hunting

Route 110

Harvard

Ayer
Appeal No. 73-206.

#### Ralph C. Izzo *v.*The Prudential Insurance Company of America.

*S. Thomas Cotroneo,*for plaintiff. *Higgins & Slattery, Robert J. Dumouchel,*for defendant.

Petition for reargument is granted. Mr. Justice Kelleher is of the opinion that the petition for reargument should be denied.
213.303-5 Purchases under BPAs. ( b ) Individual purchases for subsistence may be made at any dollar value; however, the contracting officer must satisfy the competition requirements of FAR Part 6 for any action not using simplified acquisition procedures.
Francisco Lopez is the Deputy Assistant General Counsel for Educational  Equity and Research and has served in that capacity since January 2012.  Mr. Lopez joined the Office of the General  Counsel in 1996.  Prior to joining the  Department, he litigated disability-related matters in administrative  proceedings and federal courts.  Before  attending law school, he was a special education teacher.    Mr. Lopez received his B.S. degree, magna cum laude, from  Vanderbilt University and his law degree from Georgetown University Law Center.
#### 1452.200 Scope of subpart.

This subpart sets forth the texts of all DIAR provisions and clauses. Consistent with the numbering scheme prescribed in FAR 52.101 and the approach used in FAR Subpart 52.2, this subpart is arranged by subject matter, in the same order as, and keyed to, the parts of the DIAR in which provisions and clause requirements are addressed.
OCR  conducted an investigation of the Anoka-Hennepin School District to determine  whether District students were subjected to peer-on-peer harassment based on  not conforming to gender stereotypes, in violation of Title IX of the Education  Amendments of 1972.  OCR conducted the  investigation with the U.S. Department of Justice.  On March 5, 2012, the District entered into a  Consent Decree in the U.S. District Court for the Minnesota District with OCR  and the Department of Justice.  On March  6, 2012, U.S. District Court Judge Joan  N. Ericksen granted the motion to approve the Consent Decree.  Pursuant to the Consent Decree, the  District, has agreed to take all reasonable steps to prevent and eliminate  sex-based harassment, and to respond promptly and appropriately to all reports  of harassment.  To that end, the District  has agreed, among other things, to: (1) review and improve its policies and  procedures concerning harassment to address sex-based harassment, including  harassment based on gender stereotypes, by working with an Equity Consultant;  (2) hire or appoint a Title IX and Equity Coordinator to ensure proper  implementation of the District’s harassment policies and procedures; (3)  conduct training of all District faculty, staff and students on policies and  procedures for reporting and responding to harassment; (4) hire a Mental Health  Consultant to assist students who are subject to harassment; (5) create an  Anti-Bullying/Anti-Harassment Task Force; (6) administer an Anti-Bullying  Survey once per year; (7) identify harassment “hot spots” and assign personnel  to monitor these trouble areas; (8) ensure that all of its middle and high  schools have a peer leadership program addressing harassment; (9) convene  annual meetings between the Superintendent and students at every middle and  high school in the District; and (10) provide compliance reports to DOJ and OCR  each trimester during the five year term of the Decree.  OCR and the Justice Department will monitor  the District’s actions in implementing the Consent Decree.  ***Read  the Press Release PDF (114K)| Read    the Resolution Letter***PDF (105K)    | ***Read the Consent Decree***PDF (297K)

Top
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., SUCCESSOR BY

MERGER TO WELLS FARGO BANK

MINNESOTA, N.A., AS TRUSTEE F/K/A

NORTHWEST BANK MINNESOTA, N.A., AS

TRUSTEE FOR DELTA FUNDING HOME

EQUITY LOAN TRUST 2001-1 CASE NUMBER: 1:12-cv-1521

PLAINTIFF

VS.

John Kent, Earl Kent, Mary Lee Green, Susie

Ann Bailey, Gloria Jean Pruitt, Mattie Anderson,

DEFENDANTS.

ANSWER TO AMENDED COMPLAINT

Now Come JOHN KENT, LEE EARL KENT, MARY LEE GREEN, SUSIE ANN BAILEY, 

GLORIA JEAN PRUITT, and MATTIE ANDERSON, Defendants, by and through their attorney 

Anthony M. Vaccarello, and for their Answer to Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint, state as follows:

1. Defendants admit the allegations in paragraph 1.

2. Defendants admit the allegations in paragraph 2.

3. Defendants are without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the 

truth of the allegations contained in paragraph 3.

4. Defendants admit the allegations in paragraph 4.

5. Defendants admit the allegations in paragraph 5.

6. Defendants deny that Plaintiff may elect to accelerate the principal balance due by the 

filing of a complaint.

7. Defendants deny the allegations in paragraph 7, and state further that the “pre-suit 

notices” referred to in paragraph 7 are not attached as exhibits to Plaintiff’s Complaint.

Case: 1:12-cv-01521 Document #: 15 Filed: 07/16/12 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:107
8. Defendants admit the allegations in paragraph 8.

9. Paragraph 9 contains informational allegations regarding the mortgage:

(a) - (i) Defendants admit subparagraphs (a) - (i).

(j) Defendants are without knowledge or information sufficient to form a 

belief as to the truth of the allegations contained in subparagraph 9(j).

(k) – (p) Defendants admit subparagraphs (k) – (P).

(q) Defendants deny the allegations of subparagraph (q) and state further that 

two of the defendants, John Kent and Mattie Anderson, occupy the 

property as their primary residences.

(r) – (s) Defendants admit subparagraphs (r) and (s).

WHEREFORE Defendants respectfully request that Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint be dismissed.

Respectfully Submitted,

Attorney for Defendants

/s/ Anthony M. Vaccarello

ANTHONY M. VACCARELLO

ATTORNEY AT LAW

9959 S. ROBERTS ROAD

PALOS HILLS, IL 60465

(708) 598-4400

ARDC #2880873

Case: 1:12-cv-01521 Document #: 15 Filed: 07/16/12 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:108
#### 225.7901-4 Contract clause.

Use the clause at *252.225-7048*, Export-Controlled Items, in all solicitations and contracts.
#### 225.7013-0 Scope.

This section implements 10 U.S.C. 8679 and 10 U.S.C. 8680.

[88 FR 73241, Oct. 25, 2023]
#### 214.404 Rejection of bids.
U.S. Dept Commerce/NOAA/NMFS/NWFSC/Publications

Table A-7. Concentrations, ng/g (ppb) wet weight, of chlorinated contaminants in whole juvenile chinook salmon sampled in 1989. - a,b,c,d,e,g,h,i 

Footnotes follow 

Table A-7. Continued.Concentrations, ng/g (ppb) wet weight, of chlorinated contaminants in whole juvenile chinook salmon sampled in 1989. - a,b,c,d,e,g,h,i 

Footnotes follow 

Table A-7. Continued.Concentrations, ng/g (ppb) wet weight, of chlorinated contaminants in whole juvenile chinook salmon sampled in 1989. - a,b,c,d,e,g,h,i 

Footnotes:

a The concentrations of the analytes and the percent recovery of the surrogate standard were calculated using tetrachloro-m-xylene as the internal standard.

b The "less than" symbol (<) indicates that the analyte was not detected in concentrations above the stated value. 

c Concentrations and initial identifications were determined using gas chromatography (GC) with electron capture detection (ECD).

d Concentrations less than 10 are rounded to one significant figure; concentrations greater than 10 are rounded to two significant figures.

e Percent recovery for the internal standard (surrogate) averaged 110%, CV = 9%, n = 23. Percent recovery of the surrogate includes quality control samples.

f Aldrin coelutes with an unknown compound. The concentration would not be higher than the stated value.

g Identification of analytes was confirmed by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry.

h The concentrations of the analytes were calculated using the surrogate standard 4,4'-dibromooctafluorobiphenyl so that the data can be compared to previously analyzed data.

i The percent recovery of the surrogate standard was calculated using the tetrachloro-m-xylene as the internal standard.

k Standard reference material from the National Institute of Science and Technology.

l RSD is the relative standard deviation which is the standard deviation divided by the mean and expressed as a percent. 

Table of Contents
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 5.0.3

Eastern Division

Robert Blair

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:12−cv−02637

Honorable Virginia M. Kendall

Devry, Inc., et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Tuesday, June 19, 2012:

 MINUTE entry before Honorable Virginia M. Kendall:Pursuant to stipulation,

plaintiff hereby stipulates and agrees to the dismissal of this action with prejudice as to the

federal claims alleged in Counts One and Two and without prejudice as to the state law

claims alleged in Counts Three through Six. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice(tsa, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:12-cv-02637 Document #: 13 Filed: 06/19/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:49
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Earl Richard Gleason, Appellant.

Order unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Appellant specifically waived assignment of counsel upon this appeal. (Appeal from order of Cattaragus County Court denying, without a hearing, motion to vacate a judgment of conviction for burglary, third degree, rendered October 30, 1959.) Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Henry, Noonan and Del Vecehio, JJ.