# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 19

- 1010 V (not to be published)

KATHY WIMMLER

,

Petitioner,

v.

SEC RETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent. Chief Special Master Corcoran

F iled: December 8 , 2021

Special Processing Unit (SPU); Attorney’s Fees and Costs

Kristen Linnea Blume, Richard Gage, P.C. (WY), Cheyenne, WY , for P etitioner.

C atherine Elizabeth Stolar , U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for R espondent.

DE CISION ON ATTORNEY ’S FEES AND COSTS 1

O n July 15, 2019

, Kathy Wimmler filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa

- 10, et seq

. 2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleged that she suffered a right shoulder injury related to vaccine administration which meets the Table definition for SIRVA after receiving the i nfluenza vaccine on October 11, 2017 . (Petit ion at ¶¶ 2, 6 ). On August 25, 2021

, a

1 Because this unpublished D ecision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E

Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the D ecision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99

- 660, 100 Stat. 3755

. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012 ). 

### Co rrected2 decision was issued awarding compensation to P etitioner based on the Respondent’s proffer

. (ECF No. 54 )

.

Petitioner has now filed a motion for attorney’s fees and costs, dated October 29, 2021 (ECF No. 59 ) , requesting a total award of $ 15,534.36 (representing $ 14,183.40 in fees and $ 1,350.96 in costs). In accordance with General Order No. 9, Petitioner filed a signed statement indicating that she incurred no out

- of

- pocket expenses. ( Id. at 51). Respondent reacted to the motion on November 2, 2021, indicating that he is satisfied that the statutory requirements for an award of attorney’s fees and costs are met in this

case , and “ that the Court exercise its discretion and determine a reasonable award for attorneys’ fees and costs”

. (ECF No. 60 ). Petitioner did not file a reply thereafter

.

I have reviewed the billing records submitted with P etitioner’s request. In my experience , the request appears reasonable, and I find no cause to reduce the requested hours or rates.

The Vaccine Act permits an award of reasonable attorney ’ s fees and costs

. Section 15(e). Accordingly, I hereby GRANT Petitioner’s Motion for attorney ’ s fees and costs. I award a total of $ 15,534.36 (representing $ 14,183.40 in fees and $ 1,350.96 in costs) as a lump sum in the form of a check jointly payable to Petitioner and Petitioner’s counsel

. In the absence of a timely

- filed motion for review (see A ppendix B to the Rules of the Court), the Clerk shall enter judgment in accordance with this decision. 3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master

3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), the parties may expedite entry of judgment by filing a joint notice renouncing their right to seek review.