alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS, CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS INCLUDED IN THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1995, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND THE NOTES THERETO.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                         137,043
<SECURITIES>                                   959,771
<RECEIVABLES>                                  178,832
<ALLOWANCES>                                     6,672
<INVENTORY>                                     93,648
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,045,414
<PP&E>                                         772,405
<DEPRECIATION>                                 268,751
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,010,995
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          233,444
<BONDS>                                        150,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,385
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,599,662
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,010,995
<SALES>                                        635,263
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               917,845
<CGS>                                           97,930
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   97,930
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               363,049
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                10,972
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,940
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                172,273
<INCOME-TAX>                                    25,841
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            146,432
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   146,432
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 937 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide for a refundable 

adoption tax credit. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 25, 2017 

Mr. CASEY (for himself, Mr. BLUNT, Mrs. GILLIBRAND, Mr. INHOFE, Mr. 

MARKEY, Mr. ROUNDS, and Ms. KLOBUCHAR) introduced the following 

bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide 

for a refundable adoption tax credit. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Adoption Tax Credit 

5 Refundability Act of 2017’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REFUNDABLE ADOPTION TAX CREDIT. 

7 (a) CREDIT MADE REFUNDABLE.— 

8 (1) CREDIT MOVED TO SUBPART RELATING TO

9 REFUNDABLE CREDITS.—The Internal Revenue 

10 Code of 1986 is amended— 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 937 IS

1 (A) by redesignating section 23 as section 

2 36C; and 

3 (B) by moving section 36C (as so redesig4 nated) from subpart A of part IV of subchapter 

5 A of chapter 1 to the location immediately be6 fore section 37 in subpart C of part IV of sub7 chapter A of chapter 1. 

8 (2) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.— 

9 (A) Section 25(e)(1)(C) of such Code is 

10 amended by striking ‘‘23, 25D,’’ and inserting 

11 ‘‘25D’’. 

12 (B) Section 36C of such Code, as so redes13 ignated, is amended— 

14 (i) in subsection (b)(2)(A), by striking 

15 ‘‘(determined without regard to subsection 

16 (c))’’; 

17 (ii) by striking subsection (c); and 

18 (iii) by redesignating subsections (d) 

19 through (i) as subsections (c) through (h), 

20 respectively. 

21 (C) Section 137 of such Code is amend22 ed— 

23 (i) in subsection (d), by striking ‘‘sec24 tion 23(d)’’ and inserting ‘‘section 

25 36C(c)’’; and 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 937 IS

1 (ii) in subsection (e), by striking ‘‘sub2 sections (e), (f), and (g) of section 23’’ and 

3 inserting ‘‘subsections (d), (e), and (f) of 

4 section 36C’’. 

5 (D) Section 1016(a)(26) is amended by 

6 striking ‘‘23(g)’’ and inserting ‘‘36C(f)’’. 

7 (E) Section 6211(b)(4)(A) of such Code is 

8 amended by inserting ‘‘36C,’’ after ‘‘36B’’. 

9 (F) The table of sections for subpart A of 

10 part IV of subchapter A of chapter 1 of such 

11 Code of 1986 is amended by striking the item 

12 relating to section 23. 

13 (G) Paragraph (2) of section 1324(b) of 

14 title 31, United States Code, as amended by 

15 this Act, is amended by inserting ‘‘36C,’’ after 

16 ‘‘36B,’’. 

17 (H) The table of sections for subpart C of 

18 part IV of subchapter A of chapter 1 of the In19 ternal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended by 

20 this Act, is amended by inserting after the item 

21 relating to section 36B the following new item: 

‘‘Sec. 36C. Adoption expenses.’’. 

22 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

23 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

24 December 31, 2016. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Arthur A. Wannamaker, Appellant.

Motion for permission to appeal as a poor person, for assignment of counsel and for an order directing the Otsego County Clerk *731to furnish petitioner certain papers and minutes free of charge. Permission to prosecute appeal as poor person granted. Appeal may he perfected upon one typewritten copy of the record and five typewritten copies of the brief. Motion in all other respects denied.
#### In the Matter of the Arbitration between Dino De Laurentiis, Appellant, and Cinematografica De Las Americas, S. A., et al., Respondents.

Order, entered on September 12, 1960, denying motion to stay an arbitration, or in the alternative, to limit and define the issues to be arbitrated, unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondents. Special Term properly concluded that petitioner-appellant was barred from attacking the validity of the contract because of participation in the selection of the arbi*468trators and in the arbitration proceeding. We have nevertheless examined into appellant’s contention that the contract containing the arbitration clause is not valid or enforcible, and have concluded that the contract contains all the essential elements necessary to indicate that the parties entered into a binding obligation. There is nothing illusory about the promises in the agreement. Finally, the demand for arbitration sufficiently defines the issues to be arbitrated. Settle order giving appellant seven days after service thereof with notice of entry within which to file with the American Arbitration Association his selection of arbitrators and his answer. Concur — Valente, J. P., McNally, Stevens and Eager, JJ.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Rafael Mella-Rodriguez, Appellant.

[836 NYS2d 192]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Mullen, J.), rendered September 29, 2003, convicting him of kidnapping in the first degree, robbery in the first degree, criminal use of a firearm in the first degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree (two counts), and criminal impersonation in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence.

*672Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution *(see People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power *(see*GPL 470.15 [5]), we find that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence *(see People v Romero,*7 NY3d 633 [2006]).

Further, the police lawfully stopped the vehicle *(see People v Robinson,*97 NY2d 341, 349-353 [2001]; *People v Gonzalez,*25 AD3d 620, 621 [2006]; *People v Romeo,*15 AD3d 420 [2005]). The police officer’s decision to search the trunk of the stopped vehicle to see if the missing kidnap victim was inside was justified under the emergency exception doctrine *(see People v Molnar,*98 NY2d 328, 332 [2002]; *People v Alster,*28 AD3d 490, 491 [2006]). The defendant’s contention that the officer did not have probable cause to move a NYPD T-shirt, which was covering a handgun, once it had been determined that no one was inside the truck, is unpreserved for appellate review. Accordingly, that branch of the defendant’s motion which was to suppress physical evidence, to the extent reviewed, was properly denied.

The sentence imposed was not excessive *(see People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80 [1982]).

The defendant’s contentions that the Supreme Court’s supplemental jury charge was improper, as well as his challenges to the prosecutor’s remarks on summation, are unpreserved for appellate review *(see*GPL 470.05 [2]). In any event, those claims and his remaining contentions are without merit. Rivera, J.E, Dillon, Angiolillo and Dickerson, JJ., concur.
‘Order Form (01/2005)

United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois Qy
\

Name of Assi itt if Other :
meesiasettnae | JOHNW.DARRAH | Suieteieeoner | CIN ol
CASE NUMBER 12 C 1024 DATE c wl -I4-{2-
CASE Kaizmen Jackson (#K-88195) vs. Marcus Hardy, et al.
TITLE

The plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis [#3] is denied, without prejudice. The plaintiff is directed
to submit a renewed i.f.p. petition that is certified by a trust fund officer; he must also attach copies of his prison
trust fund ledgers showing his income for the six months preceding the filing of this action [that is, from July 13,
2011, through February 13, 2011]. Failure to comply within thirty days of the date of this order will result in
denial of leave to proceed in forma pauperis and summary dismissal of this case. The Clerk is directed to provide
the plaintiff with a blank i.f.p. petition along with a copy of this order. The plaintiff is reminded that he must
provide the court with the original plus a judge’s copy of every document filed.

1 [For further details see text below.] Docketing to mail notices.
z “ es .

STATEMENT

The plaintiff, an Illinois state prisoner, has brought this pro se civil action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
The plaintiff claims that the defendants, health care providers at the Stateville Correctional Center, violated the
plaintiff's constitutional rights by acting with deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs. More
specifically, the plaintiff alleges that he received inadequate care and treatment for an injured thumb.

The Clerk has accepted this pro se civil rights complaint for docketing pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(e)
even though it was not submitted in compliance with the rules of this court. An incarcerated person seeking leave
to proceed in forma pauperis must obtain a certificate from a prison official stating the amount of money the

prisoner has on deposit in his or her prison or jail trust fund account. To enable the court to make the necessary
assessment of an initial partial filing fee, the prisoner must also “submit a certified copy of the trust fund account
statement (or institutional equivalent) for the prisoner for the 6-month period immediately preceding the filing
of the complaint or notice of appeal, obtained from the appropriate official of each prison at which the prisoner
is or was confined.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2). In the case at bar, the plaintiff has submitted an incomplete i.fip.
petition that is not certified, and that does not include copies of his prison trust fund ledgers.

(CONTINUED)

en ORY Of G34 7102

Page 1 of 2



with copies of trust fund ledgers showing his income for the six months preceding the filing of this lawsuit [that
is, from July 13, 2011, through February 13, 2012]. The Clerk will provide the plaintiff with a blank i-f-p.
application. Failure to comply [or, in the alternative, to submit the statutory filing fee of $350.00] will result in
summary dismissal of this suit. See Zaun v. Dobbin, 628 F.2d 990 (7th Cir. 1980).

The plaintiff is reminded that he must provide the court with the original plus a judge’s copy of every
document filed.

Page 2 of 2
#### 207.171-2 Definition.

*Component,* as used in this section, includes subsystems, assemblies, subassemblies, and other major elements of an end item; it does not include elements of relatively small annual acquisition value.

[71 FR 14102, Mar. 21, 2006]
400 MARYLAND AVE., S.W., WASHINGTON, DC 20202

www.ed.gov

The Department of Education's mission is to promote student achievement and preparation for global 

competitiveness by fostering educational excellence and ensuring equal access.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

Office of Postsecondary Education

2024 Program Integrity and Institutional Quality Committee

Session 3, March 4-7, 2024

Agenda

Day 1 Monday, March 4, 2024

• Announcements/Updates (Facilitator)

• R2T4 (Issue Paper 4)

• Lunch Break

• Distance Education (Issue Paper 3)

• Public Comment

Day 2 Tuesday, March 5, 2024

• Facilitator Remarks

• TRIO Subcommittee Report/Committee Discussion

• State Authorization (Issue Paper 2)

• Lunch Break

• State Authorization (Issue Paper 2)

• Cash Management (Issue Paper 1)

• Public Comment

Day 3 Wednesday, March 6, 2024

• Facilitator Remarks

• Cash Management (Issue Paper 1)

• Lunch Break

• Accreditation Issues (Issue Paper 5)

• Public Comment

Day 4 Thursday, March 7, 2024

• Facilitator Remarks

• Accreditation Issues (Issue Paper 5)

• Lunch Break 

• Accreditation Issues (Issue Paper 5)

• Facilitator Closing Remarks
Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Certified Public Accountants

Creative
Computer Applications, Inc.
Calabasas, CA

We
hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-71599, 333-18193, 333-18187, 333-02327, 333-02325) and on Form S-3 (File No.
33-89278) of our report dated October 24, 2003, relating to the financial statements of Creative Computer Applications, Inc. appearing in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for
the year ended August 31, 2003.

BDO
Seidman, LLP

Los
Angeles, California
November 21, 2003

---

QuickLinks
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 945 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 945

To amend the Carl D. Perkins Career and Technical Education Act of 2006 
  to authorize funds to identify and eliminate excessive occupational 
                               licensure.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 26, 2017

Mr. Cornyn (for himself and Mr. Peters) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, 
                     Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Carl D. Perkins Career and Technical Education Act of 2006 
  to authorize funds to identify and eliminate excessive occupational 
                               licensure.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``New Hope and Opportunity through the 
Power of Employment Act'' or the ``New HOPE Act''.

SEC. 2. STATE LEADERSHIP ACTIVITIES.

    Section 124(c) of the Carl D. Perkins Career and Technical 
Education Act of 2006 (20 U.S.C. 2344(c)) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (16)(B), by striking ``and'' after the 
        semicolon;
            (2) in paragraph (17), by striking the period at the end 
        and inserting ``; and''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(18) consulting and coordinating with other State 
        agencies for the identification, consolidation, or elimination 
        of licenses or certifications which pose an unnecessary barrier 
        to entry for aspiring workers and provide limited consumer 
        protection.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### 18.121 Bid guarantees.

The chief of the contracting office may waive the requirement to obtain a bid guarantee for emergency acquisitions when a performance bond or a performance bond and payment bond is required. (See 28.101-1(c).)

[71 FR 38248, July 5, 2006. Redesignated at 72 FR 46344, Aug. 17, 2007. Redesignated at 76 FR 18309, Apr. 1, 2011]
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 43 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. CON. RES. 43

Providing for the use of the catafalque situated in the Exhibition Hall 
 of the Capitol Visitor Center in connection with memorial services to 
   be conducted in the rotunda of the Capitol for the Honorable John 
     Sidney McCain, III, late a Senator from the State of Arizona.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            August 27, 2018

   Mr. Blunt (for himself and Ms. Klobuchar) submitted the following 
       concurrent resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Providing for the use of the catafalque situated in the Exhibition Hall 
 of the Capitol Visitor Center in connection with memorial services to 
   be conducted in the rotunda of the Capitol for the Honorable John 
     Sidney McCain, III, late a Senator from the State of Arizona.

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That the Architect of the Capitol is authorized and directed to 
transfer the catafalque which is situated in the Exhibition Hall of the 
Capitol Visitor Center to the rotunda of the Capitol so that such 
catafalque may be used in connection with services to be conducted 
there for the Honorable John Sidney McCain, III, late a Senator from 
the State of Arizona and formerly a Representative from that State.
                                 <all>
```
22.2102 Policy. ( a ) The Government shall require contractors to allow employees performing work on or in connection with a contract covered by E.O. 13706 to accrue and use paid sick leave in accordance with the E.O. and 29 CFR part 13.
( b ) *Interaction with other laws.* Nothing in E.O. 13706 or 29 CFR part 13 shall excuse noncompliance with or supersede any applicable Federal or State law, any applicable law or municipal ordinance, or a collective bargaining agreement requiring greater paid sick leave or leave rights than those established under E.O. 13706 and 29 CFR part 13. For additional details regarding interaction with the Service Contract Labor Standards statute, the Wage Rate Requirements (Construction) statute, the Family and Medical Leave Act, and State and local paid sick time laws, see 29 CFR 13.5(f)(2) through (4).
( c ) *Interaction with paid time off policies.* In accordance with 29 CFR 13.5(f)(5)(i), the paid sick leave requirements of E.O. 13706 and 29 CFR part 13 may be satisfied by a contractor's voluntary paid time off policy, whether provided pursuant to a collective bargaining agreement or otherwise, where the voluntary paid time off policy meets or exceeds the requirements. For additional details regarding paid time off policies, see 29 CFR 13.5(f)(5)(ii) and (iii).
( d ) Unless otherwise provided in this subpart, compliance is the responsibility of the contractor, and enforcement is the responsibility of the Department of Labor.
EXHIBIT 99



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Robin S. McRae, Secretary/Treasurer and Director and Chief Financial Accounting Officer of Thunder Mountain Gold, Inc. (the Registrant) do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



1.

This Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Registrant for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

Date:  April 15, 2003

/s/ Robin S. McRae

Robin S.  McRae

Secretary/Treasurer and

Director and Chief Financial Accounting Officer
UNITED FINANCIAL BANKING COMPANIES, INC.



Exhibit 32 (a)



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the Form 10-KSB of United Financial Banking Companies, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2003, I, Harold C. Rauner, President and
Chief Executive Officer of United Financial Banking Companies, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:



1 such Form 10-KSB, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2 the information contained in such Form
10-KSB, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of United Financial Banking Companies, Inc.



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Harold C. Rauner                 
|Harold C. Rauner                     
|President and Chief Executive Officer