alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|   | 1. | the      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period      ended July 10, 2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities      Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 780(d));  and |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition      and results of operations of theCompany. |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:      August 24, 2009   |   | /s/ William      L. Bridgford  |   |
|-----------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------|--------|
|                                    |   | William      L. Bridgford, Chairman |   |
|                                    |   | (Principal      Executive Officer)  |   |
|                                    |   |                                |   |
February 11, 2014



### JUDGMENT


## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

DAVID J. POWERS , Appellant

NO. 14

- 13

- 00732

- CV V.

TEXAS WORKFORCE COMM ISSION, STEPHANIE A. BREWSTE R, JOYCE A. GREEN, MICHAEL A. MCNAIR AND CHAD WALL , Appellee s

________________________________ Today the Court heard its own motion to dismiss the appeal from the judgment signed by the court below on May 21, 2013. Having considered th e motion and found it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED

. We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by appellant, David J. Powers.
We further order this decision certified below for observance.
EXHIBIT
        32.1
  **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO**
 **19
        U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
  In
        connection with the Annual Report of Statmon Technologies Corp. (the "Company")
        on Form 10-KSB for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities
        and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Geoffrey P.
        Talbot, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§
        1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the
        best of my knowledge:
  (1)  The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2)  The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  Date: July
                14, 2005
              By:
              /s/ Geoffrey
                P. Talbot**Geoffrey
                P. Talbot****Chief
                Executive Officer**
 
 A
        signed
        original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
        authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
        in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
        by Section 906, has been provided to Statmon Technologies Corp. and will
        be
        retained by Statmon Technologies Corp. and furnished to the Securities and
        Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Julian Peters, Appellant.

[832 NYS2d 819]

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated November 13, 1995 *(People v Peters,*221 AD2d 483 [1995]), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered May 25, 1993.

Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel *(see Jones v Barnes,*463 US 745 [1983]; *People v Stultz,*2 NY3d 277 [2004]). Prudenti, P.J., Miller, Santucci and Krausman, JJ, concur.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted), Dr. Paramesh Gopi, Chief
Executive Officer of Applied Micro Circuits Corporation (the Company), hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | 1. | This Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act).
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Report to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the SEC and is not to be incorporated by
reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act (whether made before or after the date of the Report), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.



/s/    DR. PARAMESH
GOPIDr. Paramesh GopiPresident and Chief Executive Officer


Date: May 11, 2010
2/3/2015 TDCJ Offender Details TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE TDCJ Home 

# Offender Information Details

Return to Search list
SID Number: TDCJ Number: Name: Race: Gender: DOB: Maximum Sentence Date: 

### Current Facility: Projected Release Date: Parole Eligibility Date: Offender Visitation Eligible: 04005910 01425912 DARNELL.STEVE ALBERT CARL W M 1970-04-22 2066-12-29 ELLIS 2032-07-15 2014-07-15 YES 

### Informationprovidedis updated once daily during weekdays andmultiple times perday 

### on visitation days. Because this information is subjectto change, family members and 

### friends are encouragedto callthe unitpriorto travelingfor a visit.
SPECIAL INFORMATION FOR SCHEDULED RELEASE: Scheduled Release Date: 

### Scheduled Release Type: Scheduled Release Location: 

## Parole ReviewInformation Offense History: Offender is not scheduled for release at this time. Will be determined when release date is scheduled. Will be determined when release date is scheduled.



### J Offense . Sentence http://offender.tdcj .state.tx.us/OffenderSearch/offenderDetail.action?sid=04005910 Case ^Ai/ OUsmdm Search

1/22/3/2015 TDCJ Offender Details Date Offense Date County No. Sentence (YY

### WIM-DD) 1988-03-29 BURG OF A VEHICLE 1990-06-26 BROWN 11,282 3-00-00 1993-01-17 ATTEMPTED MURDER 1993-06-14 BROWN 13-082 10-00-00 1999-03-23 POSS C/SUBS 1999-12-09 BROWN 15-242 5-00-00 2002-11-27 POSSESSION OF CONTROL SUBSTANCE 2003-06-13 BROWN CR16- 708 1-06-00 2006-02-27 DEL CONT SUBS 2007-03-22 BROWN CR18673 60-00-00

Return to Search list



### The Texas DepartmentofCriminalJustice updates this information regularly to ensure that it is complete and accurate, howeverthis information can change quickly. Therefore, the information on this site may not.reflect the true currentlocation, status, scheduled termination date, or other information regarding an offender. 

### For questions and comments, you may contact the Texas Department ofCriminalJustice, at (936) 295-6371 or webadmin&.tdci.texas.gov. This information is made available to the public and law enforcementin the interest ofpublic safety. Any unauthorized use ofthis information is forbidden and subject to criminal prosecution. 

### New Offender Search TDCJ Home Page

http://offender.tdcj .state.tx.us/OffenderSearch/offenderDetail.action?sid=04005910 2/2
22.404-8 Notification of improper wage determination before award. ( a ) The following written notifications by the Department of Labor shall be effective immediately without regard to 22.404-6 if received by the contracting officer prior to award: ( 1 ) A solicitation includes the wrong wage determination or the wrong rate schedule; or
( 2 ) A wage determination is withdrawn by the Administrative Review Board.
( b ) In sealed bidding, the contracting officer shall proceed in accordance with the following: ( 1 ) If the notification of an improper wage determination for the primary site of the work reaches the contracting officer before bid opening, the contracting officer shall postpone the bid opening date, if necessary, to allow a reasonable time to ( i ) obtain the appropriate determination if a new wage determination is required,
( ii ) amend the solicitation to incorporate the determination (or rate schedule), and
( iii ) permit bidders to amend their bids. If the appropriate wage determination does not change any wage rates and would not warrant amended bids, the contracting officer shall amend the solicitation to include the number and date of the new determination.
( 2 ) If the notification of an improper wage determination for the primary site of the work reaches the contracting officer after bid opening but before award, the contracting officer shall delay awarding the contract, if necessary, and if required, obtain the appropriate wage determination. The appropriate wage determination shall be processed in accordance with 22.404-5(b)(2)(i) or (ii).
( c ) In negotiated acquisitions, the contracting officer shall delay award, if necessary, and process the notification of an improper wage determination for the primary site of the work in the manner prescribed for a new wage determination at 22.404-5(c)(3).
[53 FR 4935, Feb. 18, 1988, as amended at 70 FR 33667, June 8, 2005]
Second Department,

February, 1962*

(February 28, 1962)

#### Anthony Chupka et al., Appellants, v. Lorenz-Schneider Co., Inc., et al., Respondents.

*

 Not published with other decision of February 28, 1962, 16 A D 2d 829.— [Rep.

Motion by appellants for a stay, pending appeal, denied. Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Hill and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>
                            
                                  
<ARTICLE>                               5
<CIK>                                   0000016804
<NAME>                                  Canada Southern Petroleum Ltd.
<MULTIPLIER>                            1
<CURRENCY>                              Canadian Dollars
                                  
<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                            JUN-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                         0.7241
<CASH>                                  3,414,619
<SECURITIES>                            1,326,261
<RECEIVABLES>                           798,057
<ALLOWANCES>                            0
<INVENTORY>                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        5,759,239
<PP&E>                                  12,423,729
<DEPRECIATION>                          0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          20,247,384
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   744,432
<BONDS>                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                             0
<COMMON>                                14,066,540
<OTHER-SE>                              5,214,232
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            20,247,384
<SALES>                                 962,320
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        1,152,679
<CGS>                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           2,067,611
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         (914,932)
<INCOME-TAX>                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     (914,932)
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                            (914,932)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                           (0.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                           (0.07)
                            


</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of Anthony S., Appellant.

— In a proceeding pursuant to article 7 of the Family Court Act, the appeal, as limited by appellant’s brief, is from so much of an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated September 23, 1977, as placed appellant with the Division for Youth for a period of three years, pursuant to a restrictive placement. Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements. The Family Court should have made specific written findings of fact as to each of the considerations set forth in subdivision 2 of section 753-a of the Family Court Act (see *Matter of Samuel M.,*64 AD2d 611; *Matter of Kenneth S.,*59 AD2d 744). However, on the facts in the record, we find that the Family Court’s disposition was supported by a preponderance of the evidence. We have examined appellant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Titone, J. P., Suozzi, Gulotta and Martuscello, JJ., concur.
#### 227.7103 Other than commercial products, commercial services, or commercial processes.
-80 -79 -78 -77 -76 -75 -74

 38

 39

 40

 41

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★

▲ ▲

▲

▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 1000

18 12 06 00

08/07

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 07 Aug 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.90 N 76.65 W Meters AGL
#### 1852.219-81 Limitation on subcontracting—SBIR Phase II program.

As prescribed in 1819.7302(b), insert the following clause:

# Limitation on Subcontracting—SBIR Phase II Program (OCT 2006)

The Contractor shall perform a minimum of one-half of the research and/or analytical effort (total contract price less profit) conducted under this contract. Any deviation from this requirement must be approved in advance and in writing by the Contracting Officer. Since the selection of R&D contractors is substantially based on the best scientific and technological sources, it is important that the Contractor not subcontract technical or scientific work without the Contracting Officer's advance approval.

(End of clause)

[71 FR 61688, Oct. 19, 2006]
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****2010 report on sanitary andphytosanitary measures [electronic resource]**
 
2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013| 2014
 
SuDoc Number:PREX 9.2:SA 5
Item Number:0857-G-01 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000679568
 
January 14, 2020
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF ORION FINANCIAL, LTD. FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30,
1996
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                          27,188
<SECURITIES>                                   194,888
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               222,076
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 222,076
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              176
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       371,322
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,639,182
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   222,076
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   37,774
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (24,574)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (24,574)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (24,574)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### 225.872-1 General.

(a) As a result of memoranda of understanding and other international agreements, DoD has determined it inconsistent with the public interest to apply restrictions of the Buy American statute or the Balance of Payments Program to the acquisition of qualifying country end products from the following qualifying countries:

- Australia
- Belgium
- Canada
- Czech Republic
- Denmark
- Egypt
- Estonia
- Federal Republic of Germany
- Finland
- France
- Greece
- Israel
- Italy
- Japan
- Latvia
- Lithuania
- Luxembourg
- Netherlands
- Norway
- Poland
- Portugal
- Slovenia
- Spain
- Sweden
- Switzerland
- Turkey
- United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.

(b) Individual acquisitions of qualifying country end products from the following qualifying country may, on a purchase-by-purchase basis (see 225.872-4), be exempted from application of the Buy American statute and the Balance of Payments Program as inconsistent with the public interest: Austria.

(c) The determination in paragraph (a) of this subsection does not limit the authority of the Secretary concerned to restrict acquisitions to domestic sources or reject an otherwise acceptable offer from a qualifying country source when considered necessary for national defense reasons.

[68 FR 15621, Mar. 31, 2003, as amended at 69 FR 8116, Feb. 23, 2004; 75 FR 32641, June 8, 2010; 77 FR 35880, June 15, 2012; 77 FR 76942, Dec. 31, 2012; 81 FR 50651, Aug. 2, 2016; 81 FR 93840, Dec. 22, 2016; 82 FR 61484, Dec. 28, 2017; 87 FR 15816, Mar. 18, 2022]
#### 1450.101-2 Policy.

Requests for extraordinary contractual actions shall be submitted by the HCA to the Director, PAM, for further action.
Functional Statements
Office of English Language Acquisition

## OELA Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Programs

The DAS for Policy and Programs has oversight responsibilities for the Office of Multilingual Initiatives and will provide direction, coordination, and leadership to the Office of Multilingual Initiatives.

### Office of Multilingual Initiatives (OMI)

The Office of Multilingual Initiatives is responsible for the administration of all the agency multilingual initiatives, the National Professional Development Program, special initiatives to support multilingualism, and the Native American and Alaska Native Children in School Program. OMI will also be responsible for its own GPRA requirements and Performance Indicators.

 In performing its responsibilities, the office also:

- Reviews and recommends approval of discretionary program applications, negotiates changes, and issues and recommends grant awards, contracts, and cooperative agreements.
- Initiates reports and follow-up activities and maintains a database of information about programs for the purpose of furnishing information, as appropriate.
- Establishes quality control measures and performance standards for grantmaking tasks, i.e., selection of readers, peer reviewers and reading processes.
- Provides technical assistance and monitoring, including on-site program reviews, for all programs it administers.
- Supports the Grantee Satisfaction Survey, maintains program mailbox, and responds to correspondence.
- Maintains official files for all its programs and conduct closeout activities.
- Manages the process of identifying successful practices in programs that contribute to the quality of education nationwide.
- Supports and assists with OELA workshops, conferences and other initiatives as requested by the Assistant Deputy Secretary and Director.
- Undertakes special initiatives as identified by the Assistant Deputy Secretary and Director and office leadership that will improve multilingualism across the country.

TOP
#### Rome Insurance Company *v.*Miles *et al.*

January 18, 1913.

Receivership. Before Judge Maddox. Floyd superior court. August 7, 191?.

*Dean & Dean*and *F. M. Hunt,*for plaintiff in error.

*Copeland, Hamilton & Hutchens, M. B. Fuba/nks, Lipscomb, Willingham & Wright,*and *Maddox & Doyal,*contra. " •

Atkinson, J.

Under the pleadings and evidence there was no abuse of discretion in appointing receivers in this case. No specific exception is taken to any of the powers conferred upon the receivers, and no ruling is made in regard thereto.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*