alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           4,224
<SECURITIES>                                     1,853
<RECEIVABLES>                                   94,382
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,387
<INVENTORY>                                    106,737
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               220,178
<PP&E>                                         110,085
<DEPRECIATION>                                  61,459
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 326,977
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           88,947
<BONDS>                                         68,612
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,614
<OTHER-SE>                                     167,804
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   326,977
<SALES>                                        103,692
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               103,692
<CGS>                                           77,109
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   77,109
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                28,158
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,404
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,927)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,054)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,873)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.12)
        

</TABLE>
Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed January 15, 2013.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-12-00051-CR

NO. 14-12-00052-CR

KENNETH EARL BRUNSON, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 262nd District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. 1284376 and 1295225

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant entered a plea of guilty to aggravated robbery with a deadly 

weapon. On June 27, 2012, the trial court sentenced appellant to confinement for 

fifteen years in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal 

Justice. Appellant filed a timely notice of appeal.

Appellant’s appointed counsel filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal 
2

is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders 

v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967), by presenting a professional 

evaluation of the record and demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds for 

relief. See Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974).

A copy of counsel’s brief was delivered to appellant. Appellant was advised 

of the right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se response. See Stafford 

v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 512 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). As of this date, no pro se 

response has been filed.

We have carefully reviewed the record and counsel’s brief and agree the 

appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. Further, we find no reversible error 

in the record. Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges and Justices Boyce and Donovan.

Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
#### In the Matter of Joseph F. Barbano, an Attorney, Respondent. Committee on Professional Standards, Third Judicial Department, Petitioner.

— Respondent was admitted to the Bar by this court on September 30, 1937. Petitioner moves to confirm the report of the Referee which sustained two charges of misconduct: neglect of a client’s action for divorce and service of a copy of a pleading bearing a false verification. The record supports the Referee’s findings and the motion to confirm the Referee’s report is granted. While respondent’s neglect of the divorce action has been established, we find in partial mitigation that respondent made a number of appearances on behalf of his client in Family Court and obtained a support order and a protective order for her. In addition, it appears that service of a copy of a pleading bearing a false verification was not deliberate since respondent mistakenly believed that the original pleading had been verified by his client. In determining the appropriate measure of discipline to be imposed upon respondent for his misconduct, we have given due consideration to the seriousness of each of the charges as well as the mitigating circumstances previously mentioned, and we have determined that the ends of justice will be adequately served in this instance by a censure. Respondent censured. Mahoney, P. J., Greenblott, Sweeney, Kane and Herlihy, JJ., concur.
225.7003-2 Restrictions. ( a ) The following restrictions implement 10 U.S.C. 4863. Except as provided in 225.7003-3— ( 1 ) Do not acquire the following items, or any components of the following items, unless any specialty metals contained in the items or components are melted or produced in the United States (also see guidance at PGI 225.7003-2(a)): ( i ) Aircraft.
( ii ) Missile or space systems.
( iii ) Ships.
( iv ) Tank or automotive items.
( v ) Weapon systems.
( vi ) Ammunition.
( 2 ) Do not acquire a specialty metal (e.g., raw stock, including bar, billet, slab, wire, plate, and sheet; castings; and forgings) as an end item, unless the specialty metal is melted or produced in the United States. This restriction applies to specialty metal acquired by a contractor for delivery to DoD as an end item, in addition to specialty metal acquired by DoD directly from the entity that melted or produced the specialty metal.
( b ) For more information on specialty metals restrictions and reporting of noncompliances, see *https://www.acq.osd.mil/asda/dpc/cp/ic/specialty-metals-restrictions.html .*
[74 FR 37636, July 29, 2009, as amended at 81 FR 28730, May 10, 2016; 87 FR 15818, Mar. 18, 2022; 87 FR 76994, Dec. 16, 2022]
As Amended: December 6, 2012

Date of Hearing: November 15, 2012 E-1

State of California

AIR RESOURCES BOARD

CALIFORNIA EVAPORATIVE EMISSION STANDARDS AND TEST PROCEDURES

FOR 2001 AND SUBSEQUENT MODEL MOTOR VEHICLES

Adopted: August 5, 1999

Amended: June 22, 2006

Amended: October 17, 2007

Amended: December 2, 2009

Amended: September 27, 2010

Amended: March 22, 2012

Amended: December 6, 2012

Note: Proposed amendments to this document are shown in underline to indicate 

additions and in strikeout to indicate deletions compared to the test 

procedures as last amended March 22, 2012. Existing intervening text that 

is not amended is indicated by a row of asterisks ( * * * * ).
As Amended: December 6, 2012 2

Date of Hearing: November 15, 2012

* * * *

CALIFORNIA EVAPORATIVE EMISSION STANDARDS AND TEST PROCEDURES

FOR 2001 AND SUBSEQUENT MODEL MOTOR VEHICLES

The provisions of Title 40, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Part 86, Subparts A

and B (as adopted or amended as of July 1, 1989); Subpart S (as adopted or amended on 

May 4, 1999); and, such sections of these Subparts as last amended on such other date 

set forth next to the 40 CFR Part 86 section title listed below, insofar as those subparts 

pertain to evaporative emission standards and test procedures, are hereby adopted as 

the “California Evaporative Emission Standards and Test Procedures for 2001 and 

Subsequent Model Years,” with the following exceptions and additions:

PART I. GENERAL CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS FOR EVAPORATIVE 

EMISSIONS

* * * *

E. Emission Standards

1. Evaporative Emission Standards for 2001 and Subsequent Model 

Year Vehicles Other Than Motorcycles. 

* * * *

(e) For 2015 and subsequent model motor vehicles, the following 

evaporative emission requirements apply:

* * * *

(iii) Carry-Over of 2014 Model-Year Evaporative Families Certified 

to the Zero-Fuel Evaporative Emission Standards. A manufacturer may 

carry over 2014 model motor vehicles certified to the zero-fuel (0.0 grams 

per test) evaporative emission standards set forth in section I.E.1.(c) 

through the 2018 model year and be considered compliant with the 

requirements of section I.E.1.(e). For all motor vehicles that are certified via 

this carry-over provision, the emission standards set forth in section 

I.E.1.(c) shall apply when determining in-use compliance throughout the 

vehicle’s useful life. If the manufacturer chooses to participate in the 

fleet-average option for the highest whole vehicle diurnal plus hot soak 

emission standard, the following family emission limits are assigned to 

these evaporative families for the calculation of the manufacturer’s 

fleet-average hydrocarbon emission value.
As Amended: December 6, 2012 3

Date of Hearing: November 15, 2012

Vehicle Type

Highest Whole Vehicle 

Diurnal + Hot Soak

(grams per test)

Passenger Cars 0.300

Light-Duty Trucks

6,000 lbs. GVWR and under,

and 0 - 3,750 lbs. LVW

0.300

Light-Duty Trucks

6,000 lbs. GVWR and under,

and 3,751 – 5,750 lbs. LVW

0.400

Light-Duty Trucks

6,001 - 8,500 lbs. GVWR 0.500

* * * *
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 15 (Tuesday, January 26, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 7091]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-01695]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Notice

TIME AND DATE: Thursday, January 28, 2021 at 10:00 a.m.

PLACE: Virtual hearing. Note: Because of the COVID-19 pandemic, we will 
conduct the hearing virtually. If you would like to access the hearing, 
see the instructions below.

STATUS: This hearing will be open to the public. To access the virtual 
hearing, go to the commission's website www.fec.gov and click on the 
banner to be taken to the hearing page.

MATTER TO BE CONSIDERED: Audit Hearing: Grassroots Victory Political 
Action Committee.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Judith Ingram, Press Officer, 
Telephone: (202) 694-1220.


    Authority: Government in the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552b.

Laura E. Sinram,
Acting Secretary and Clerk of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2021-01695 Filed 1-22-21; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6715-01-P
#### Spann *et al. v.*Edwards *et al.*

April 17, 1913.

Habeas corpus. Before Judge Pendleton.- Fulton superior court. December 33, 1913.

*Felder, Anderson, Dillon & Whitman,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Dorsey, Shelton & Dorsey*and *Charles Montgomery’Jr.,*contra.

Atkinson, J.

1. Assignments of error upon rulings of the court in excluding evidence, which do not set forth, in form or substance, the evidence which was excluded, are insufficient “to present any question for decision.

2. A judgment declaring the adoption of a child, rendered by a court of competent jurisdiction in another State, regular on its face, is conclusive of the status at the time of its rendition, and will be accorded full faith and credit when introduced in a habeas-corpus proceeding in this State for the custody of the child. See *Milner*v. *Gatlin,*139 *Ga.*109 (76 S. E. 860).

3. In such a proceeding, where a judgment of the character above mentioned is brought into competition with a younger judgment rendered in the courts of this State, declaring the adoption of the same child by another person, such foreign judgment will prevail.

*A.*The amendment to the answer of the respondents, which was stricken on demurrer, did not allege any change in the status, or in the habits or conditions of the parties, since the date of the first judgment adopting the child.

5. Under the evidence the judge did not err in awarding the custody of the child to plaintiffs.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
|   | (1) | The accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended February 26, 2011, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the accompanying Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/ Adolphus B. Baker                   |   |
|-----------------------------------------|--------|
| Adolphus B. Baker                       |   |
| President and Chief Executive Officer   |   |
|                                    |   |
| /s/ Timothy A. Dawson                   |   |
| Timothy A. Dawson                       |   |
| Vice President, Chief Financial Officer |   |

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
balance sheet, statement of income and statement of cash flows contained in
Form 10-Q of Cambridge Electric Light Company for the three months ended March
31, 1998 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000016573
<NAME> CAMBRIDGE ELECTRIC LIGHT COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                            <C>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                   MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-TYPE>                        3-MOS
<BOOK-VALUE>                      PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>           98,756
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>         10,160
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>              24,038
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>            73,242
<OTHER-ASSETS>                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     206,196
<COMMON>                             8,665
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>           27,953
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                 14,316
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>      50,934
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                    0
<PREFERRED>                              0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                 7,402
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                  29,295
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>           0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>       10,100
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>              0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                         0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>     108,465
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>      206,196
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>           27,571
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                 1,841
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>          22,623
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>          24,464
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>              3,107
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                     405
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>       3,512
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>               803
<NET-INCOME>                         2,709
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>              0
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>        2,709
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                 0
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>              361
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>               1,971
<EPS-PRIMARY>                            0
<EPS-DILUTED>                            0
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1





Certification of the President and Chief Executive Officer


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the


Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





I, Bowen S. Diehl, President and Chief Executive Officer of Capital Southwest Corporation, certify that, to my knowledge:


1The Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2018, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 7, 2018 (“accompanied report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


2The information contained in the accompanied report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of Capital Southwest Corporation.





Date:  August 7, 2018By:/s/ Bowen S. DiehlBowen S. DiehlPresident and Chief Executive Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

EASTERN DIVISION 

 ) 

Betty McGuire, ) 

 ) 

 Judgment Creditor, ) Case Number: 12-cv-03563 

 ) 

-vs- ) District Judge Gary Feinerman 

 ) 

Mountain Green of Arizona, LLC )

 ) 

 Judgment Debtor, ) 

 ) 

and ) 

 ) 

Topco Associates, LLC ) 

 ) 

 Garnishee ) 

MOTION FOR ENTRY OF CONDITIONAL JUDGMENT AND ISSUANCE OF 

SUMMONS TO CONFIRM CONDITIONAL JUDGMENT

Judgment creditor, Betty McGuire, by and through undersigned counsel, pursuant to § 735 ILCS 

5/12-706, respectfully moves this Court to issue an Entry of Conditional Judgment and a Summons 

to Confirm Conditional Judgment against garnishee, Topco Associates, LLC, and in support thereof, 

states as follows: 

1. Topco Associates, LLC, is indebted to the judgment debtor, Mountain Green of Arizona, 

LLC, other than for wages, or has in its possession, custody or control other property 

belonging to it in which it has an interest. (Doc. 4-1, Affidavit of David Chipman 

(“Chipman Aff.”) ¶ 1.) 

2. The last known address of the judgment debtor is Mountain Green of Arizona, LLC, c/o 

Edward L. McBain, Statutory Agent, 10418 E. Palo Bres Drive, Scottsdale, Arizona 85262. 

(Chipman Aff. ¶ 2.) 
3. Judgment in the case captioned Betty McGuire v. Mountain Green of Arizona, LLC, No. CV 

12-0023-PHX-DGC (D. Ariz.) was entered on March 9, 2012. (Chipman Aff. ¶ 4.) 

4. The amount of the judgment against judgment debtor Mountain Green of Arizona, LLC was 

$127,912.50, consisting of $100,000 in principal, $27,500.00 in interest and $412.50 in 

penalties. (Chipman Aff. ¶ 5.) 

5. Garnishee was served with the Garnishment Summons (Non-Wage), Garnishment Notice 

(with a return date of June 13, 2012) and Interrogatories to Garnishee/Respondent on June 7, 

2012. (Doc. 6, Return of Authorized Service) 

6. To date, the Garnishee has failed to respond to the Garnishment Summons. 

7. Pursuant to 735 ILCS 5/12-706, “[w]hen any person summoned as garnishee fails to appears 

and answer as required . . . the court may enter a conditional judgment against the garnishee 

for the amount due upon the judgment against the judgment debtor.” 

8. Under this provision, the Court may also issue “[a] summons to confirm the conditional 

judgment . . . commanding the garnishee to show cause why the judgment should not be 

made final.” Id.

9. If after being served with said summons, the garnishee “fails to appear and answer, the court 

shall confirm such judgment to the amount of the judgment against the judgment debtor and 

award costs.” Id.
WHEREFORE, Ms. McGuire respectfully requests that the Court issue an Entry of Conditional 

Judgment and a Summons to Confirm Conditional Judgment against garnishee, Topco Associates, 

LLC. 

DATED this 1st day of August, 2012. 

 CHIPMAN GLASSER, LLC 

 By: /s David Chipman 

 Attorney No. 6210117 

 David Chipman 

 Attorney for Betty McGuire 

 2000 S. Colorado Blvd., Suite 7500 

 Denver, CO 80222 

 Telephone: (303) 578-5780 

 Fax: (303) 578-5790 

4821-7748-7120, v. 1
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Synthetic Blood International, Inc.(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Robert W. Nicora, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | 1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | -- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





|September 19, 2003 |  |  |  | /s/    ROBERT W. NICORA
|------------------ |  |  |  | -----------------------
|                   |  |  |  |                        
|                   |  |  |  |
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

ANTONIO LOPEZ,

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 State.

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-17-00039-CR

Appeal from the

171st District Court

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 20120D04452)

O R D E R

The record before us does not contain the trial court’s certification of the defendant’s 

right of appeal. TEX.R.APP.P. 25.2(a)(2), (d). The trial court is ordered to prepare and file with 

the trial court clerk within thirty days from the date of this order a certification of the defendant’s 

right of appeal as required by TEX.R.APP.P. 25.2(a)(2) and 25.2(d). The trial court clerk shall 

prepare a supplemental clerk’s record containing the certification and file it with this Court no 

later than June 4, 2017.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 20

th day of April, 2017.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez and Palafox, JJ.
Exhibit 10(b)


                                 SHEA & GARDNER
                         1800 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W.
                             Washington, D.C. 20036

                                 (202) 828-2000
                               Fax: (202) 828-2195


                                 April 21, 2000

Board of Directors
The Prudential Insurance Company of America
751 Broad Street
Newark, NJ 07102


Ladies and Gentlemen:

     We hereby consent to the reference to our name under the caption "Legal
Matters" in the State of Additional Information filed as part of Post-Effective
Amendment No. 6 to the registration statement on Form N-4 for The Prudential
Discovery Select Group Variable Contract Account (File No. 333-23271). In giving
this consent, we do not admit that we are in the category of persons whose
consent is required under Section 7 of the Securities Act of 1933.

                                         Very truly yours,

                                         SHEA & GARDNER

                                         By: /s/ CHRISTOPHER E. PALMER
                                                 ----------------------
                                                 Christopher E. Palmer