Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 153 / Monday, August 10, 2015 / Notices 47919 

Applicants: Tennessee Gas Pipeline 

Company, L.L.C. 

Description: Section 4(d) Rate Filing: 

Clean-Up Filing—2015 to be effective 9/ 

1/2015. 

Filed Date: 8/3/15. 

Accession Number: 20150803–5256. 

Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/17/15. 

Docket Numbers: RP15–1178–000. 

Applicants: Cimarron River Pipeline, 

LLC. 

Description: Section 4(d) Rate Filing: 

Fuel Tracker 2015—Winter Season 

Rates to be effective 11/1/2015. 

Filed Date: 8/4/15. 

Accession Number: 20150804–5000. 

Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/17/15. 

The filings are accessible in the 

Commission’s eLibrary system by 

clicking on the links or querying the 

docket number. 

Any person desiring to intervene or 

protest in any of the above proceedings 

must file in accordance with Rules 211 

and 214 of the Commission’s 

Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 

385.214) on or before 5:00 p.m. Eastern 

time on the specified comment date. 

Protests may be considered, but 

intervention is necessary to become a 

party to the proceeding. 

eFiling is encouraged. More detailed 

information relating to filing 

requirements, interventions, protests, 

service, and qualifying facilities filings 

can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/

docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For 

other information, call (866) 208–3676 

(toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502–8659. 

Dated: August 4, 2015. 

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr., 

Deputy Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2015–19563 Filed 8–7–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6717–01–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

[EPA–HQ–OPP–2015–0099; FRL–9929–22] 

Registration Review Proposed Interim 

Decisions; Notice of Availability 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: This notice announces the 

availability of EPA’s proposed interim 

registration review decisions for the 

pesticides listed in the table in Unit II 

of this notice, and opens a public 

comment period on the proposed 

decisions. This notice also opens the 

dockets and announces the availability 

of EPA’s proposed interim registration 

review decisions for 2-propen-1- 

aminium, N,N-dimethyl-N-2-propenyl-, 

chloride, homopolymer (or 

homopolymer) and tributyltin oxide (or 

TBTO); and also opens the docket, 

announces the availability of the draft 

human health and ecological risk 

assessments, and announces the 

proposed interim registration review 

decision for dipropyl 

isocinchomeronate. Registration review 

is EPA’s periodic review of pesticide 

registrations to ensure that each 

pesticide continues to satisfy the 

statutory standard for registration, that 

is, that the pesticide can perform its 

intended function without unreasonable 

adverse effects on human health or the 

environment. Through this program, 

EPA is ensuring that each pesticide’s 

registration is based on current 

scientific and other knowledge, 

including its effects on human health 

and the environment. 

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before October 9, 2015. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by the docket identification 

(ID) number for the specific pesticide of 

interest provided in the table in Unit 

II.A., by one of the following methods: 

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// 

www.regulations.gov. Follow the online 

instructions for submitting comments. 

Do not submit electronically any 

information you consider to be 

Confidential Business Information (CBI) 

or other information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. 

• Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental 

Protection Agency Docket Center (EPA/ 

DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. 

NW., Washington, DC 20460–0001. 

• Hand Delivery: To make special 

arrangements for hand delivery or 

delivery of boxed information, please 

follow the instructions at http://

www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html. 

Additional instructions on commenting 

or visiting the docket, along with more 

information about dockets generally, is 

available at http://www.epa.gov/

dockets. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

For pesticide specific information, 

contact: the Chemical Review Manager 

for the pesticide of interest identified in 

the table in Unit II. 

For general information on the 

registration review program, contact: 

Richard Dumas, Pesticide Re-Evaluation 

Division (7508P), Office of Pesticide 

Programs, Environmental Protection 

Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., 

Washington, DC 20460–0001; telephone 

number: (703) 308–8015; email address: 

dumas.richard@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. General Information 

A. Does this action apply to me? 

This action is directed to the public 

in general, and may be of interest to a 

wide range of stakeholders including 

environmental, human health, farm 

worker, and agricultural advocates; the 

chemical industry; pesticide users; and 

members of the public interested in the 

sale, distribution, or use of pesticides. 

Since others also may be interested, the 

Agency has not attempted to describe all 

the specific entities that may be affected 

by this action. If you have any questions 

regarding the applicability of this action 

to a particular entity, consult the 

Chemical Review Manager for the 

pesticide of interest identified in the 

table in Unit II. 

B. What should I consider as I prepare 

my comments for EPA? 

1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this 

information to EPA through 

regulations.gov or email. Clearly mark 

the part or all of the information that 

you claim to be CBI. For CBI 

information in a disk or CD–ROM that 

you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the 

disk or CD–ROM as CBI and then 

identify electronically within the disk or 

CD–ROM the specific information that 

is claimed as CBI. In addition to one 

complete version of the comment that 

includes information claimed as CBI, a 

copy of the comment that does not 

contain the information claimed as CBI 

must be submitted for inclusion in the 

public docket. Information so marked 

will not be disclosed except in 

accordance with procedures set forth in 

40 CFR part 2. 

2. Tips for preparing your comments. 

When preparing and submitting your 

comments, see the commenting tips at 

http://www.epa.gov/dockets/

comments.html. 

II. What action is the Agency taking? 

Pursuant to 40 CFR 155.58, this notice 

announces the availability of EPA’s 

proposed interim registration review 

decisions for the pesticides shown in 

the following table, and opens a 60-day 

public comment period on the proposed 

interim decisions. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
47920 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 153 / Monday, August 10, 2015 / Notices 

TABLE—REGISTRATION REVIEW PROPOSED INTERIM DECISIONS

Registration review case name and number Docket ID number Chemical review manager and contact information 

Chlorfenapyr 7419 ............................................................ EPA–HQ–OPP–2010–0467 Margaret Hathaway, hathaway.margaret@epa.gov, 

703–305–5076. 

Daminozide 0032 .............................................................. EPA–HQ–OPP–2009–0242 Margaret Hathaway, hathaway.margaret@epa.gov, 

703–305–5076. 

Dipropyl isocinchomeronate 2215 .................................... EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0578 Marianne Mannix, mannix.marianne@epa.gov, 703– 

347–0275. 

Fenoxaprop p-ethyl 7209 .................................................. EPA–HQ–OPP–2007–0437 Miguel Zavala, zavala.miguel@epa.gov, 703–347– 

0504. 

Imazapyr 3078 .................................................................. EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0200 Joel Wolf, wolf.joel@epa.gov, 703–347–0228. 

Isoxaben 7219 .................................................................. EPA–HQ–OPP–2007–1038 Christina Scheltema, scheltema.christina@epa.gov, 

703–308–2201. 

Paclobutrazol 7002 ........................................................... EPA–HQ–OPP–2006–0109 Khue Nguyen nguyen.khue@epa.gov 703–347–0248. 

2-Propen-1-aminium, N,N-dimethyl-N-2-propenyl-, chloride, homopolymer (or homopolymer) 5024.EPA–HQ–OPP–2015–0255 Donna Kamarei, kamarei.donna@epa.gov, 703–347– 

0443. 

Silicon dioxide and silica gel 4081 ................................... EPA–HQ–OPP–2007–1140 James Parker parker.james@epa.gov 703–306–0469. 

Sulfentrazone 7231 ........................................................... EPA–HQ–OPP–2009–0624 Christina Scheltema, scheltema.christina@epa.gov, 

703–308–2201. 

Tributyltin Oxide (or TBTO) 2620 ..................................... EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0801 Sandra O’Neill, oneill.sandra@epa.gov, 703–347–0141. 

The registration review final decisions 

for these cases are dependent on the 

assessments of listed species under the 

Endangered Species Act (ESA), 

determinations on the potential for 

endocrine disruption, and/or 

assessments of exposure and risk to 

pollinators. 

Chlorfenapyr (Proposed Interim 

Decision). Chlorfenapyr is a member of 

the pyrroles class of insecticide/

miticides, which works by disrupting 

adenosine triphosphate (ATP) 

production, leading to cell dysfunction. 

Chlorfenapyr is registered only for 

application to fruiting vegetables and 

ornamentals in greenhouses; and as a 

crack/crevice/spot treatment on indoor 

and outdoor residential sites (including 

treatment for bed bugs), food/feed 

handling areas, indoor and outdoor 

commercial sites, and indoor medical 

sites. EPA conducted assessments for 

both human health and ecological risks. 

Possible human health risks of concern 

were identified for chlorfenapyr, 

including occupational risks and risks 

to young children for certain residential 

uses. Several risk mitigation measures, 

including the termination of the use of 

chlorfenapyr on mattresses, are 

proposed to address human health risk 

concerns. No risks of concern were 

identified in the ecological risk 

assessment for non-listed species. The 

Agency has made a No Effect 

determination for chlorfenapyr under 

ESA section 7 for all listed species and 

a No Habitat Modification 

determination for all designated critical 

habitats for the currently registered 

uses. 

Daminozide (Proposed Interim 

Decision). Daminozide is a systemic 

plant growth regulator registered to 

control the development of 

commercially grown container plants. It 

is used in nurseries, shadehouses, and 

greenhouses, and is applied as a foliar 

spray, a use pattern resulting in little or 

no potential for off-site drift. 

Daminozide has no registered food or 

residential uses. EPA conducted 

ecological and human health risk 

assessments for daminozide, and 

concluded that there were no significant 

risks of concern. Other than clarifying 

application rate information, the Agency 

is not calling for changes to daminozide 

registrations or labels at this time. 

Dipropyl isocinchomeronate 

(Combined Docket Opening, Release of 

Draft Human Health and Ecological Risk 

Assessments, and Proposed Interim 

Decision). Dipropyl isocinchomeronate 

is registered for use as an insect 

repellent for use on humans and 

companion animals to repel flies, gnats, 

and other flying and biting insects. The 

Agency has concluded that there are no 

human health risk concerns associated 

with the use of dipropyl 

isocinchomeronate. Based on the 

limited usage, diffusion over a large 

treatment area, and the low probability 

of non-target organism exposure, the 

Agency has not found any ecological 

risks of concern associated with 

dipropyl isocinchomeronate, and 

anticipates making a No Effect 

determination for all listed species and 

a No Habitat Modification 

determination for all designated critical 

habitats for listed species. At this time, 

the Agency is proposing that no 

additional data are needed, and is not 

proposing any risk reduction measures 

for this case. 

Fenoxaprop p-ethyl (Proposed Interim 

Decision). FPE is a selective aryloxy 

phenoxy-propionate herbicide 

registered for use on barley, cotton, rice, 

soybeans, and wheat for post-emergence 

control of grassy weeds. Additional nonagricultural use sites include 

conservation reserves, ornamentals, 

rights-of-way, and turf. EPA’s 

Registration Review Proposed Interim 

Decision for FPE is: First; no additional 

data are required at this time; and 

second, certain risk reduction measures 

are needed at this time. To address 

potential risk to non-target terrestrial 

monocots, spray drift management 

language is proposed for all FPE product 

registrations used on agricultural, wide 

area, or rights-of-way use sites. The 

Agency also is proposing the 

implementation of label language 

clarifying use rates, to which the 

registrants have already agreed. In 

addition, EPA proposes label language 

to include recommended herbicideresistance management measures. 

Imazapyr (Proposed Interim 

Decision). Imazapyr is a non-selective 

systemic herbicide registered for use in 

pre- and post-emergent treatments to 

control terrestrial and aquatic weeds, 

including grasses, broadleaf weeds, and 

woody species. The registration review 

case includes both the acid (imazapyr) 

and the isopropylamine salt (imazapyr 

IPA). EPA’s Registration Review 

Proposed Interim Decision for the case 

is that first, no additional data are 

required at this time, and second, no 

changes to the registrations or their 

labeling are needed at this time. 

Isoxaben (Proposed Interim Decision). 

Isoxaben is a pre-emergent, soil-directed 

benzamide herbicide registered for use 

in controlling a variety of broad-leaf 

weeds. Agricultural uses include grapes 

and bearing fruit and nut trees. Nonagricultural uses include turf, lawns, 

ornamentals, and landscape mulch. 

Quantitative human health and 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 153 / Monday, August 10, 2015 / Notices 47921 

ecological risk assessments were 

completed for isoxaben. There are no 

occupational or residential risks of 

concern. There are potential ecological 

risks to listed and non-listed aquatic 

vascular and terrestrial plants, and risks 

to mammals from foliar applications of 

isoxaben. The Agency has made the 

following Registration Review Proposed 

Interim Decision for isoxaben: First, no 

additional data are required at this time, 

and second, certain risk reduction 

measures are needed at this time, 

including uniform spray drift 

management label language for products 

applied by spraying, and recommended 

herbicide resistance management 

language on all product labels. 

Paclobutrazol (Proposed Interim 

Decision). Paclobutrazol is a systemic 

triazole plant growth regulator 

registered for use on nonresidential turf, 

on ornamentals in greenhouses and 

nurseries, as a tree injection, and as a 

seed treatment for certain vegetable 

crops. There are no residential uses of 

paclobutrazol. EPA conducted risk 

assessments for both human health and 

ecological risk, and a screening level 

endangered species assessment. No 

human health risks were identified. The 

ecological risk assessment indicated 

potential risks to birds, mammals, 

terrestrial and aquatic plants, freshwater 

and estuarine/marine fish, and 

freshwater and estuarine/marine 

invertebrates. The Agency is proposing 

to modify the application directions for 

paclobutrazol to reduce risks to nontarget organisms from runoff. The 

screening-level endangered species 

assessment did not come to a 

conclusion of No Effect to listed species, 

therefore, consultation with the Fish 

and Wildlife Service and the National 

Marine Fisheries Service (‘‘the 

Services’’) on the potential risk of 

paclobutrazol to listed species will be 

necessary. 

2-Propen-1-aminium, N,N-dimethylN-2-propenyl-, chloride, homopolymer 

(Combined Preliminary Work Plan and 

Proposed Interim Decision). There is 

one product containing this active 

ingredient; it is registered to control 

mollusks in potable water supplies. The 

Agency did not call-in any data in 

support of this registration review case. 

Additionally, the Agency did not 

conduct a human health or an 

environmental risk assessment due to 

the lack of exposure concern for the 

product’s registered use. Based on the 

lack of potential exposure, the Agency 

is proposing a No Effect determination 

for listed species. 

Silicon dioxide and silica gel 

(Proposed Interim Decision). Products 

containing these two naturally occurring 

active ingredients are registered for use 

as insecticides on a variety of 

agricultural and residential use sites to 

control pests such as ants, cockroaches, 

flies, fleas, and ticks. EPA conducted an 

ecological risk assessment that included 

a screening-level endangered species 

assessment. The Agency engaged in 

informal consultation with FWS to 

reach a ‘‘may affect, but not likely to 

adversely affect’’ determination for 

direct effects to terrestrial invertebrates 

and a No Effect determination for all 

other listed taxa. No human health risk 

assessment was conducted because no 

toxicological endpoints are identified 

for the two active ingredients. No risk 

mitigation measures for human health 

or ecological effects are included in the 

silica gel and silicon dioxide Proposed 

Interim Decision. 

Sulfentrazone (Proposed Interim 

Decision). Sulfentrazone is a broad 

spectrum, pre-emergence, soil-directed 

proto porphyrinogen herbicide used to 

control a variety of weeds. It is 

registered for use on field crops, 

specialty vegetable crops, fruit trees, 

ornamentals, and turf grass. EPA 

completed quantitative human health 

and ecological risk assessments for 

sulfentrazone in 2014, and amended the 

ecological risk assessment in 2015. 

There are no residential risks of 

concern; however, there is a risk 

concern for pesticide handlers that can 

be adequately mitigated by wearing 

chemical-resistant gloves. In addition, 

there are potential risk concerns for 

terrestrial plants. The Agency has made 

the following Registration Review 

Proposed Interim Decision for 

sulfentrazone: First, no additional data 

are required at this time; and second, 

certain risk reduction measures are 

needed at this time. These measures 

include uniform spray drift management 

language on sulfentrazone labels for 

products applied by spraying and 

recommended herbicide resistance 

management language on all product 

labels. 

Tributyltin oxide (Combined 

Preliminary Work Plan and Proposed 

Interim Decision). There are two EPA 

registrations for TBTO for rubber 

coatings on the sonar domes of nuclear 

submarines and for oceanographic 

conductivity sensors. Based on the lack 

of potential for dietary exposure and no 

residential uses, the Agency did not 

conduct a human health risk 

assessment. Exposure to aquatic 

organisms would occur only from the 

small amount of TBTO potentially 

leaching from sonar domes, and the 

Agency believes that risks to non-target, 

non-listed species are minimal. TBTO 

use as an antifoulant on sonar domes is 

undergoing ESA consultation with the 

Department of Defense, EPA, and the 

Services for compounds covered under 

EPA’s Uniform National Discharge 

Standards. At this time, the Agency is 

proposing that no additional data are 

needed, and is not proposing any risk 

reduction measures for this case. 

The registration review docket for a 

pesticide includes earlier documents 

related to the registration review of the 

case. For example, the review typically 

opens with the availability of a 

Summary Document, containing a 

Preliminary Work Plan, for public 

comment. A Final Work Plan typically 

is placed in the docket following public 

comment on the initial docket. 

Following a period for public comment 

on the proposed interim decisions 

announced in this notice, the Agency 

will issue interim registration review 

decisions for products containing the 

affected active ingredients. 

The registration review program is 

being conducted under congressionally 

mandated time frames, and EPA 

recognizes the need both to make timely 

decisions and to involve the public. 

Section 3(g) of the Federal Insecticide, 

Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) 

(7 U.S.C. 136a(g)) required EPA to 

establish by regulation procedures for 

reviewing pesticide registrations, 

originally with a goal of reviewing each 

pesticide’s registration every 15 years to 

ensure that a pesticide continues to 

meet the FIFRA standard for 

registration. The Agency’s final rule to 

implement this program was issued in 

the Federal Register of August 9, 2006 

(71 FR 45720) (FRL–8080–4) and 

became effective in October 2006, and 

appears at 40 CFR part 155, subpart C. 

The Pesticide Registration Improvement 

Act of 2003 (PRIA) was amended and 

extended in September 2007. FIFRA, as 

amended by PRIA in 2007, requires EPA 

to complete registration review 

decisions by October 1, 2022, for all 

pesticides registered as of October 1, 

2007. 

The registration review final rule at 40 

CFR 155.58(a) provides for a minimum 

60-day public comment period on all 

proposed interim registration review 

decisions. This comment period is 

intended to provide an opportunity for 

public input and a mechanism for 

initiating any necessary amendments to 

the proposed interim decisions. All 

comments should be submitted using 

the methods in ADDRESSES, and must be 

received by EPA on or before the closing 

date. These comments will become part 

of the docket for the pesticides included 

in the table in Unit II. Comments 

received after the close of the comment 

period will be marked ‘‘late.’’ EPA is not 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
47922 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 153 / Monday, August 10, 2015 / Notices 

required to consider these late 

comments. 

The Agency will carefully consider all 

comments received by the closing date 

and, as appropriate, will provide a 

‘‘Response to Comments Memorandum’’ 

in the docket for each of the pesticides 

included in the table in Unit II. The 

interim registration review decision will 

explain the effect that any such 

comments had on the decision and 

provide the Agency’s response to 

significant comments, as needed. 

Background on the registration review 

program is provided at: http://

www2.epa.gov/pesticide-reevaluation. 

Links to earlier documents related to the 

registration review of the pesticide cases 

identified in this notice are provided on 

the Pesticide Chemical Search data base 

accessible at: http://iaspub.epa.gov/

apex/pesticides/f?p=chemicalsearch. 

Authority: 7 U.S.C. 136 et seq. 

Dated: July 30, 2015. 

Richard P. Keigwin, Jr., 

Director, Pesticide Re-Evaluation Division, 

Office of Pesticide Programs. 

[FR Doc. 2015–19590 Filed 8–7–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

[FRL–9932–09-Region 2] 

Proposed Settlement Pursuant Section 

122(h) of CERCLA Relating to the 

Gowanus Canal Superfund Site, 

Brooklyn, Kings County, New York 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Notice; request for public 

comment. 

SUMMARY: In accordance with Section 

122(i) of the Comprehensive 

Environmental Response, 

Compensation, and Liability Act of 

1980, as amended (‘‘CERCLA’’), 42 

U.S.C. 9622(i), notice is hereby given by 

the U.S. Environmental Protection 

Agency (‘‘EPA’’), Region 2, of a 

proposed settlement agreement 

pursuant to Section 122(h) of CERCLA, 

entered into by and EPA, Region 2, and 

Patterson Fuel Oil Co., Inc. (‘‘Settling 

Party’’), pertaining to the Gowanus 

Canal Superfund Site (‘‘Site’’) located in 

Brooklyn, Kings County, New York. 

Under the Settlement Agreement, the 

Settling Party agrees to pay EPA 

$100,000.00 for the recovery of response 

actions incurred at the Site. 

The Settlement Agreement includes a 

covenant by EPA not to sue or to take 

administrative action against the 

Settling Party pursuant to Sections 106 

and 107(a) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. 9606 

and 9607(a), with regard to the Site, as 

defined in the Settlement Agreement. 

For thirty (30) days following the date 

of publication of this notice, EPA will 

receive written comments relating to the 

Settlement Agreement. EPA will 

consider all comments received and 

may modify or withdraw its consent to 

the Settlement Agreement if comments 

received disclose facts or considerations 

that indicate that the proposed 

Settlement Agreement is inappropriate, 

improper or inadequate. EPA’s response 

to any comments received will be 

available for public inspection at EPA 

Region 2 offices, 290 Broadway, New 

York, New York 10007–1866. 

DATES: Comments must be submitted on 

or before September 9, 2015. 

ADDRESSES: The proposed Settlement 

Agreement can be viewed at http://

www.epa.gov/region02/superfund/npl/

gowanus/additionaldocs.html. It is also 

available for public inspection at EPA 

Region 2 offices at 290 Broadway, New 

York, New York 10007–1866. 

A copy may also be obtained from 

Brian Carr, Assistant Regional Counsel, 

New York/Caribbean Superfund Branch, 

Office of Regional Counsel, U.S. EPA 

Region 2, 290 Broadway, 17th Floor, 

New York, New York 10007–1866, 212– 

637–3170, carr.brian@epa.gov. 

Comments should reference the 

Gowanus Canal Superfund Site, 

Brooklyn, New York. Index No. 

CERCLA–02–2015–2008 and should be 

sent by mail or email to Brian Carr, 

Assistant Regional Counsel, at the 

address or email address above. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Brian Carr, Assistant Regional Counsel, 

at the address, email or telephone 

number stated above. 

Dated: July 27, 2015. 

Walter Mugdan, 

Director, Emergency and Remedial Response 

Division, U.S. Environmental Protection 

Agency, Region 2. 

[FR Doc. 2015–19601 Filed 8–7–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

[EPA–HQ–ORD–2015–0467; FRL–9932–08– 

ORD] 

Board of Scientific Counselors (BOSC) 

Safe and Sustainable Water Resources 

Subcommittee Meeting—August 2015; 

Public Requests Correction 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Notice; correction. 

SUMMARY: On July 30, 2015, the U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency 

(EPA), Office of Research and 

Development (ORD), gave notice of a 

meeting of the Board of Scientific 

Counselors (BOSC) Safe and Sustainable 

Water Resources Subcommittee in the 

Federal Register. On Page 45536, 

Column 3, in the DATES section, EPA 

inadvertently listed the date by which 

members of the public should request a 

draft agenda or request an opportunity 

to make oral presentations at the 

meeting as July 25, 2015. The correct 

date by which requests should be made 

is August 25, 2015. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The 

Designated Federal Officer via mail at: 

Cindy Roberts, Mail Code 8104R, Office 

of Science Policy, Office of Research 

and Development, U.S. Environmental 

Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania 

Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460; via 

phone/voice mail at: (202) 564–1999; or 

via email at: roberts.cindy@epa.gov. 

Dated: July 31, 2015. 

Fred S. Hauchman, 

Director, Office of Science Policy. 

[FR Doc. 2015–19592 Filed 8–7–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

Proposed Partial Consent Decree, 

Clean Air Act Citizen Suit 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Notice of proposed partial 

consent decree; request for public 

comment. 

SUMMARY: In accordance with section 

113(g) of the Clean Air Act, as amended 

(‘‘CAA’’ or the ‘‘Act’’), notice is hereby 

given of a proposed partial consent 

decree to address a lawsuit filed by the 

Sierra Club in the United States District 

Court for the District of Columbia: 

Sierra Club v. EPA, Civil Action No. 10– 

cv–1541 (CKK) (D.D.C.) (filed Sept. 14, 

2010). Plaintiff filed a lawsuit alleging 

that Gina McCarthy, in her official 

capacity as Administrator of the United 

States Environmental Protection Agency 

(‘‘EPA’’), failed to perform duties 

mandated by the CAA to: (1) Promulgate 

a federal implementation plan (‘‘FIP’’) 

for the State of Texas for the 1997 fine 

particulate matter (‘‘PM2.5’’) and ozone 

national ambient air quality standards 

(‘‘NAAQS’’); (2) promulgate a FIP for the 

State of Texas for the 1997 ozone 

NAAQS; and (3) take final approval/

disapproval action on the state 

implementation plan (‘‘SIP’’) that Texas 

submitted for implementation of the 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES