alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 10-S
------------
(C-XIII)


                          CONSENT OF DIRECTOR
                                  OF
                        CARLYLE INVESTORS, INC.


     The undersigned, being all the directors of Carlyle Investors, Inc.,
a Delaware corporation (the "Corporation"), acting by written consent
pursuant to Section 141(f) of the Delaware General Corporation Law, hereby
consent to the adoption of, and do hereby adopt, the following resolutions:

     WHEREAS, this Corporation is the holder of certain demand notes made
by its shareholders in the aggregate original principal amount of
$3,000,000 (the "Notes"), as set forth in EXHIBIT A attached hereto; and,

     WHEREAS, this Corporation desires to make a distribution to its
shareholders aggregating $2,000,000, as a return of capital (the
"Distribution"); and,

     WHEREAS, in order to effect the Distribution, the outstanding
principal amount of the Notes will be reduced as set forth in such Exhibit
A.

     NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that this Corporation make the
Distribution, as a return of capital, effective as of the date hereof, to
be paid by the reduction of the outstanding principal amount as set forth
EXHIBIT A attached hereto; and,

     FURTHER RESOLVED, that any officer of this Corporation is hereby
authorized and directed to effect the Distribution as of the date hereof,
to enter into, execute and deliver, or to ratify, any and all documents
incidental or related thereto, including without limitation, those
documents deemed necessary or appropriate to evidence the reduction in the
outstanding principal balances of each of the Notes as set forth herein,
and any said officer is hereby authorized and directed to take whatever
actions said officer deems reasonably necessary in order to consummate the
transaction described or contemplated.


Dated:           October 31, 1996




STUART C. NATHAN
--------------------
Stuart C. Nathan



Being the sole director or Carlyle Investors, Inc., a Delaware corporation.





                               EXHIBIT A
                               ---------



                                                Original
                                                Principal    Principal
Payor                          Date of Note      Amount      Reduction
-----                         --------------   ----------    ---------

JMB Realty Corporation        March 25, 1993   $  450,000     $300,000

JMB/Manhattan
 Associates, Ltd.             March 25, 1993   $  600,000     $400,000

Carlyle Real Estate
 Limited Partnership-XIII     March 25, 1993   $  600,000     $400,000

Carlyle Real Estate
 Limited Partnership-XIV      March 25, 1993   $1,200,000     $800,000

JMB Service Bureau
 company (a division of
 Northbrook Corporation),
 as successor-in-interest
 to JMB Holdings Corporation  March 25, 1993   $  150,000     $100,000
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 820 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 820

   To designate a portion of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge as 
                              wilderness.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 4, 2017

 Mr. Markey (for himself, Mr. Bennet, Mr. Schumer, Mr. Blumenthal, Mr. 
 Van Hollen, Mrs. Murray, Mr. Booker, Mr. Franken, Mrs. McCaskill, Ms. 
  Cantwell, Mr. Wyden, Mr. Whitehouse, Mr. Peters, Ms. Baldwin, Mrs. 
 Shaheen, Ms. Stabenow, Mr. Cardin, Mr. Udall, Mr. Merkley, Mr. Casey, 
   Mr. Heinrich, Mr. Leahy, Mr. Murphy, Mr. Tester, Mr. Durbin, Mr. 
  Sanders, Ms. Duckworth, Mr. Reed, Ms. Warren, Mrs. Gillibrand, Ms. 
  Klobuchar, Mr. Nelson, Ms. Hassan, Mr. Carper, Mrs. Feinstein, Ms. 
  Cortez Masto, Ms. Hirono, Mr. Brown, Ms. Harris, and Mr. Menendez) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
               Committee on Environment and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To designate a portion of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge as 
                              wilderness.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF PORTION OF ARCTIC NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE AS 
              WILDERNESS.

    Section 4 of the National Wildlife Refuge System Administration Act 
of 1966 (16 U.S.C. 668dd) is amended by adding at the end the 
following:
    ``(p) Designation of Certain Land as Wilderness.--Notwithstanding 
any other provision of this Act, a portion of the Arctic National 
Wildlife Refuge in Alaska comprising approximately 1,559,538 acres, as 
generally depicted on the map entitled `Arctic National Wildlife 
Refuge, Coastal Plain Proposed Wilderness', dated October 20, 2015, 
labeled with Map ID 03-0172, and available for inspection in the 
offices of the Secretary, is designated as a component of the National 
Wilderness Preservation System under the Wilderness Act (16 U.S.C. 1131 
et seq.).''.
                                 <all>
```
1845.506-70 Responsibilities of the plant clearance officer. When plant clearance is not delegated to DOD, NASA plant clearance officers shall be responsible for— ( a ) Providing the contractor with instructions and advice regarding the proper preparation of inventory schedules;
( b ) Accepting or rejecting inventory schedules;
( c ) Conducting or arranging for inventory verification;
( d ) Initiating prescribed screening and effecting resulting actions;
( e ) Final plant clearance of contractor inventory;
( f ) Pre-inventory scrap determinations, as appropriate;
( g ) Evaluating the adequacy of the contractor's procedures for property disposal and providing feedback to the Property Administrator regarding the contractor's performance in property disposal activities;
( h ) Determining the method of disposal;
( i ) Surveillance of any contractor conducted sales;
( j ) Accounting for all contractor inventory reported by the contractor;
( k ) Advising and assisting, as appropriate, the contractor, the Supply and Equipment Management Officer (SEMO) and other Federal agencies in all actions relating to the proper and timely disposal of contractor inventory;
( l ) Approving the method of sale, evaluating bids, and approving sale prices for any contractor-conducted sales; and
( m ) Recommending the reasonableness of selling expenses related to any contractor-conducted sales.
Case: 1:12-cr-00172 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/09/12 Page 1 of 20 PageID #:1
Case: 1:12-cr-00172 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/09/12 Page 2 of 20 PageID #:2
Case: 1:12-cr-00172 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/09/12 Page 3 of 20 PageID #:3
Case: 1:12-cr-00172 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/09/12 Page 4 of 20 PageID #:4
Case: 1:12-cr-00172 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/09/12 Page 5 of 20 PageID #:5
Case: 1:12-cr-00172 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/09/12 Page 6 of 20 PageID #:6
Case: 1:12-cr-00172 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/09/12 Page 7 of 20 PageID #:7
Case: 1:12-cr-00172 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/09/12 Page 8 of 20 PageID #:8
Case: 1:12-cr-00172 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/09/12 Page 9 of 20 PageID #:9
Case: 1:12-cr-00172 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/09/12 Page 10 of 20 PageID #:10
Case: 1:12-cr-00172 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/09/12 Page 11 of 20 PageID #:11
Case: 1:12-cr-00172 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/09/12 Page 12 of 20 PageID #:12
Case: 1:12-cr-00172 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/09/12 Page 13 of 20 PageID #:13
Case: 1:12-cr-00172 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/09/12 Page 14 of 20 PageID #:14
Case: 1:12-cr-00172 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/09/12 Page 15 of 20 PageID #:15
Case: 1:12-cr-00172 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/09/12 Page 16 of 20 PageID #:16
Case: 1:12-cr-00172 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/09/12 Page 17 of 20 PageID #:17
Case: 1:12-cr-00172 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/09/12 Page 18 of 20 PageID #:18
Case: 1:12-cr-00172 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/09/12 Page 19 of 20 PageID #:19
Case: 1:12-cr-00172 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/09/12 Page 20 of 20 PageID #:20
August 16, 1971

Honorable Ted Butler Criminal District Attorney Bexar County Courthouse San Antonio, Texas 78204

Dear Mr. Butler: Opinion No. M-936 Re: Authority ofthe Commissioners Court ofBexar County to make payments to the Industrial Development Commission of Metropolitan Bexar County. You have requested our opinion onwhether the Commissioners Court of Bexar County may make agrant to the Industrial Development Commission of Metropolitan Bexar County, anon-profit corporation, for the purpose of promoting industrial development inBexar County.

The Commissioners Court is a court oflimited jurisdiction and has only such powers as are conferred upon itby the statutes and Constitution of this State, whether by express terms or by necessary implication. Section 18, Article V, Constitution ofTexas; Article 2351, Vernon’s Civil Statutes; Bland v. Orr, 90 Tex. 492, 39 S.W. 558 (1897); Mills v. Lampasas County, 90 Tex. 603, 40 S.W. 403 (1897); Anderson v. Wood, 137 Tex. 201, 152 S.W. 2d 1084 (1941); Canales v. Laughlin, 147 Tex. 169, 214 S.W. 2d 451 (1948); Starr County v. Guerra, 297 S.W. 2d 379 (Tex. Civ. App. 1956); Van Rosenberg v. Lovett, 173 S.W. 508 (Tex. Civ. App. 1915, error ref. ); Attorney General Opinion No. C-350 (1964. )

Section 1ofArticle 2352d, Vernon’s Civil Statutes, applicable to Bexar County, authorized the Commissioners Court to expend money for the purpose of advertising and promoting the growth and development of the county. However, before such expenditure may be made itmust first be approved by a majority vote ofthe qualifying taxpaying voters ofthe county voting at an election called for such purpose. Attorney General Opinions R-2136 (1950). V-1238 (1951) and C-39 (1963. ) Itwas held inthese opinions that inthe absence of such election, expenditures of county funds for purposes similar to those stated inyour request may not be made.

-4563-Honorable Ted Butler, page 2 (M-936)

You state inyour request that no election pursuant to the provisions ofArticle 2352d, Vernon’s Civil Statutes, has been held inBexar County, andwe know ofno other provision inthe statutes of this State authorizing such expenditure. We are therefore in agreement with you that the Commissioners Court of Bexar County is not authorized to expend moneys for the purpose outlined inyour request. SUMMARY Since no election has been held inBexar County pursuant to the provisions ofArticle 2352d. Vernon’s Civil Statutes, the Commissioners Court is not authorized to expend money for the purpose ofmaking a grant to a non-profit corporation to promote industrial development inBexar county.

y General of Texas Prepared by John Reeves Assistant Attorney General APPROVED: OPINION COMMITTEE Kerns Taylor, Chairman W. E. Allen, Co-Chairman Robert Lemens Gordon Cass Melvin Corley Lewis A. Jones MEADE F. GRIFFIN Staff Legal Assistant ALFRED WALKER Executive Assistant NOLA WHITE First Assistant

‘4564-
April 28, 2000


Van Eck Funds
99 Park Avenue
New York, NY  10016

Gentlemen:

         As counsel to Van Eck Funds (the "Trust"), a Massachusetts business
trust, we have been asked to render our opinion with respect to the issuance of
an indefinite number of Class A and Class B shares of beneficial interest, $.001
par value per share, of the Trust (the "Shares") representing interests in the
Emerging Markets Vision Fund series of the Trust, as more fully described in the
prospectus and statement of additional information contained in Post-Effective
Amendment No. 53 (the "Amendment") to the Trust"s Registration Statement No.
2-97596 on Form N-1A.

         We have examined the Amended and Restated Master Trust Agreement of the
Trust dated February 6, 1992, as amended, the By-Laws of the Trust, as amended,
the records of certain meetings and written consents of the Trustees of the
Trust, the prospectus and statement of additional information relating to the
Shares contained in the Amendment, and such other documents, records and
certificates as we have deemed necessary for the purposes of this opinion.

         Based upon the foregoing, we are of the opinion that the Shares, when
issued and sold in accordance with the terms of the prospectus and statement of
additional information relating to the Shares in effect at the time of such
issuance and sale, will be legally issued, fully paid and non-assessable by the
Trust.

         We also hereby consent to the reference to this firm in the statement
of additional information under the heading "Additional Information--Counsel"
which forms a part of the Amendment and to the filing of this opinion as an
exhibit to the Amendment.

                                             Very truly yours,

                                             /s/ Goodwin, Procter & Hoar LLP
                                             -------------------------------
                                             GOODWIN, PROCTER & HOAR  LLP
#### 215.406-2 Certificate of current cost or pricing data.

See PGI 215.406-2 for additional information and guidance on Certificates of Current Cost or Pricing Data.

[88 FR 73236, Oct. 25, 2023]
# Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

Docket Number: FAA

- 2015

- 4816

Directorate Identifier: 2014NM238AD

SAFRAN MESSIER

- BUGATTI

- DOWTY A25434

- 32

- 3374

--- 6/12/14

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the

Supplemental AD Docket



### MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008
#### Nils Jernberg, Appellant, v. Virtis Company, Inc., Respondent.

Motion for stay granted on condition that appellant perfects appeal by August 1, 1962 and be ready for argument at the September Term.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-27-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-01-2000
<CASH>                                         240,357
<SECURITIES>                                   113,565
<RECEIVABLES>                                  247,075
<ALLOWANCES>                                    15,459
<INVENTORY>                                    103,854
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               701,730
<PP&E>                                         376,933
<DEPRECIATION>                                 244,844
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 906,335
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          537,195
<BONDS>                                        113,770
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,119
<OTHER-SE>                                     254,251<F1>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   906,335
<SALES>                                      2,486,123
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,486,123
<CGS>                                        2,287,316
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,287,316
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               293,368<F2>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,723
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (48,607)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,541
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (50,148)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (50,148)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.48)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.48)
<FN>
<F1>Other SE includes additional paid-in capital of $1,043,964, account deficit of
$<791,928> and cumulative other comprehensive income of $2,215.
<F2>Other expenses include R&D of $191,511, SG&A of $89,274, stock compensation
expense of $2,437, acquired in-process technology of $7,028, and amortization
of goodwill and other intangible assets of $3,118.
</FN>


</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of Samuel C. Yeaton, Jr., Petitioner, v. Arthur Levitt, as State Comptroller, Respondent.

Submission of a controversy upon an agreed statement of facts pursuant to sections 546-548 of the Civil Practice Act; petitioner seeking refund of an assessment paid in 1958 in respect of alleged additional income for the year 1954 representing the difference between the price he paid in that year for stock of his corporate employer, upon exercise of a restricted stock option, and the fair market value at the date of purchase. The State Tax Commission has authorized the refund but the respondent Comptroller has declined to approve and pay it. The primary issue arises upon the respondent Comptroller’s contention that section 358-e of the Tax Law (L. 1959, eh. 845), which (under certain conditions) removes restricted stock option *936benefits, received by corporate employees, from classification as income to that of capital gain, and at the same time defers taxation of the gain until realized, is constitutionally invalid insofar as the act is, by its terms, given retroactive effect with respect to returns for any taxable year commencing on or after January 1, 1950; the constitutional provisions invoked by the Comptroller being those prohibiting the gift of State money (N. Y. Const., art. VII, § 8). We find in point and therefore controlling the decision in *People ex reí. Clark*V. *Gilchrist*(243 N. Y. 173) which upheld, as against the same constitutional argument here advanced, an amendment to the Tax Law providing that stock dividends, as there defined, should not be subject to tax, and gave the amendment retroactive effect. We do not reach the other legal questions posed by the briefs. Judgment for petitioner, with costs. Settle judgment. Gibson, Herlihy and Taylor, JJ., concur; Coon, J. P., not voting.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 11310]

Acting under the authority of and in accordance with section 1(a)(ii)(B) of Executive Order 13224 of September 23, 2001, as amended by Executive Order 13268 of July 2, 2002, Executive Order 13284 of January 23, 2003, and Executive Order 13886 of September 9, 2019, I hereby determine that the person known as Fuad Ahmad Nuri Ali al-Shakan, also known as Bilal al-Chamchamali, also known as Bilal Kirkuki, also known as Mam Karim, is a foreign person who is a leader of al-Qa'ida Kurdish Battalions, a group whose property and interests in property are concurrently blocked pursuant to a determination by the Secretary of State pursuant to Executive Order 13224.

Consistent with the determination in section 10 of Executive Order 13224 that prior notice to persons determined to be subject to the Order who might have a constitutional presence in the United States would render ineffectual the blocking and other measures authorized in the Order because of the ability to transfer funds instantaneously, I determine that no prior notice needs to be provided to any person subject to this determination who might have a constitutional presence in the United States, because to do so would render ineffectual the measures authorized in the Order.

                    This notice shall be published in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                

Dated: January 6, 2021.

Michael R. Pompeo,

Secretary of State.

[FR Doc. 2021-00629 Filed 1-13-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-AD-P
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6,1

Eastern Division

Michelle Holt

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:12−cv−02571

Honorable Thomas M. Durkin

MRS BPO, L.L.C.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Wednesday, February 5, 2014:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin:Final pretrial conference

held on 2/5/2014. Various rulings made for the reasons stated on the record. Mailed

notice(srn, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:12-cv-02571 Document #: 76 Filed: 02/05/14 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:795
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 12 (Thursday, January 21, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 6329]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-01199]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The public portions of the applications listed below, as well as 
other related filings required by the Board, if any, are available for 
immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank(s) indicated below and 
at the offices of the Board of Governors. This information may also be 
obtained on an expedited basis, upon request, by contacting the 
appropriate Federal Reserve Bank and from the Board's Freedom of 
Information Office at https://www.federalreserve.gov/foia/request.htm. 
Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards 
enumerated in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)).
    Comments regarding each of these applications must be received at 
the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors, 
Ann E. Misback, Secretary of the Board, 20th Street and Constitution 
Avenue, NW, Washington DC 20551-0001, not later than February 22, 2021.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (Colette A. Fried, Assistant 
Vice President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414:
    1. PSB Holdings, Inc., Wausau, Wisconsin; to merge with Waukesha 
Bankshares, Inc., and thereby indirectly acquire Sunset Bank & Savings, 
both of Waukesha, Wisconsin.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, January 14, 
2021.
Michele Taylor Fennell,
Deputy Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2021-01199 Filed 1-19-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P