alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
215.404-72 Modified weighted guidelines method for nonprofit organizations other than FFRDCs. ( a ) *Definition.* As used in this subpart, a nonprofit organization is a business entity— ( 1 ) That operates exclusively for charitable, scientific, or educational purposes;
( 2 ) Whose earnings do not benefit any private shareholder or individual;
( 3 ) Whose activities do not involve influencing legislation or political campaigning for any candidate for public office; and
( 4 ) That is exempted from Federal income taxation under section 501 of the Internal Revenue Code.
( b ) For nonprofit organizations that are entities that have been identified by the Secretary of Defense or a Secretary of a Department as receiving sustaining support on a cost-plus-fixed-fee basis from a particular DoD department or agency, compute a fee objective for covered actions using the weighted guidelines method in 215.404-71, with the following modifications: ( 1 ) *Modifications to performance risk (Blocks 21-23 of the DD Form 1547).* ( i ) If the contracting officer assigns a value from the standard designated range (see 215.404-71-2(c)), reduce the fee objective by an amount equal to 1 percent of the costs in Block 20 of the DD Form 1547. Show the net (reduced) amount on the DD Form 1547.
( ii ) Do not assign a value from the technology incentive designated range.
( 2 ) *Modifications to contract type risk (Block 24 of the DD Form 1547).* Use a designated range of −1 percent to 0 percent instead of the values in 215.404-71-3. There is no normal value.
( c ) For all other nonprofit organizations except FFRDCs, compute a fee objective for covered actions using the weighted guidelines method in 215.404-71, modified as described in paragraph (b)(1) of this subsection.
[63 FR 63799, Nov. 17, 1998, as amended at 65 FR 77831, Dec. 13, 2000; 67 FR 20692, Apr. 26, 2002; 67 FR 49255, July 30, 2002]
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 16 (Wednesday, January 27, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 7331]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-01719]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration #16702 and #16703; NORTH CAROLINA Disaster Number 
NC-00119]


Presidential Declaration Amendment of a Major Disaster for Public 
Assistance Only for the State of North Carolina

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Amendment 1.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a 
major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of North 
Carolina (FEMA-4568-DR), dated 10/14/2020.
    Incident: Hurricane Isaias.
    Incident Period: 07/31/2020 through 08/04/2020.

DATES: Issued on 01/13/2021.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 12/14/2020.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 07/14/2021.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of the President's major disaster 
declaration for Private Non-Profit organizations in the State of North 
Carolina, dated 10/14/2020, is hereby amended to include the following 
areas as adversely affected by the disaster.

Primary Counties: Lenoir

    All other information in the original declaration remains 
unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

Cynthia Pitts,
Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2021-01719 Filed 1-26-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8026-03-P
Order Form (01/2005)

United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois

Name of Assigned Judge

or Magistrate Judge

CHARLES P. KOCORAS Sitting Judge if Other

than Assigned Judge

CASE NUMBER 11 C 7964 DATE November 23, 2011

CASE

TITLE

Joseph Edgar Dunkin (#21185-424) vs. Warden Lockett, et al.

DOCKET ENTRY TEXT:

This action is transferred to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, Terre Haute

Division, for assessment of the filing fee and whatever other action the transferee court deems appropriate. The

clerk shall not issue summonses unless the transferee court so directs. The case and all pending motions are

terminated on this court’s docket. 

O [For further details see text below.] Docketing to mail notices.

STATEMENT

The plaintiff, a federal prisoner, has brought this pro se civil rights action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331

and Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). The plaintiff

claims that correctional officials at the federal penitentiary in Terre Haute, Indiana have violated the plaintiff’s

constitutional rights by retaliating against him and by acting with deliberate indifference to his safety. More

specifically, the plaintiff contends that he faces “rapes, assaults, broken bones, death threats, [and] retaliation”

from both inmates, for unspecified reasons, and from the prison staff, as punishment for his previous lawsuits. 

Without expressing an opinion as to the merits of the complaint, the court finds that venue does not lie in this

judicial district.

Under 28 U.S.C. § 1391(e), a civil action in which a defendant is an officer or employee of the United

States or any agency thereof may be brought in a judicial district in which: (1) a defendant in the action resides,

(2) a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred, or (3) the plaintiff resides, if

no real property is joined in the action.

The court discerns no basis for venue in this district. The matters underlying this lawsuit have taken place

at the Federal Correctional Institution in Terre Haute, Indiana, where the plaintiff is currently confined. Terre

Haute (Vigo County) is situated in the Southern District of Indiana federal judicial district. See 28 U.S.C. § 94(b). 

Presumably, the defendants can be found in that district. Venue does, therefore, exist in the Southern 

(CONTINUED)

mjm

Page 1 of 2
STATEMENT (continued)

District of Indiana and, given the particulars of this case, that district is clearly the most convenient forum for this

action.

For the foregoing reasons, this action is transferred to the United States District Court for the Southern

District of Indiana, Terre Haute Division, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a) for assessment of the filing fee and

whatever other action the transferee court deems appropriate. The clerk shall not issue summonses unless the

transferee court so directs.

Date: November 23, 2011 

CHARLES P. KOCORAS

U.S. District Judge

Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 14 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. CON. RES. 14

Authorizing the use of Emancipation Hall in the Capitol Visitor Center 
      for an event to celebrate the birthday of King Kamehameha I.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 27, 2017

    Ms. Hirono (for herself and Mr. Schatz) submitted the following 
       concurrent resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Authorizing the use of Emancipation Hall in the Capitol Visitor Center 
      for an event to celebrate the birthday of King Kamehameha I.

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring),

SECTION 1. USE OF EMANCIPATION HALL FOR EVENT TO CELEBRATE BIRTHDAY OF 
              KING KAMEHAMEHA I.

    (a) Authorization.--Emancipation Hall in the Capitol Visitor Center 
is authorized to be used on June 11, 2017 for an event to celebrate the 
birthday of King Kamehameha I.
    (b) Preparations.--Physical preparations for the conduct of the 
event described in subsection (a) shall be carried out in accordance 
with such conditions as may be prescribed by the Architect of the 
Capitol.
                                 <all>
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 5.1.1

Eastern Division

Jacob M. Scheiner Ira

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:12−cv−02653

Honorable Edmond E. Chang

Midas, Inc., et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Tuesday, January 29, 2013:

 MINUTE entry before Honorable Edmond E. Chang:For the reasons stated in the

Memorandum Opinion and order, the Court grants Defendants' motions to dismiss [30, 36,

39] as to the federal claims and relinquishes jurisdiction as to the state−law claims. Civil

case terminated. Mailed notice(slb, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:12-cv-02653 Document #: 59 Filed: 01/29/13 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:1593
<PAGE>
                                                                 EXHIBIT (10)(c)

                       CONSENT OF BARRY G. SKOLNICK, ESQ.

    I hereby consent to the reference to my name under the caption "Legal
Matters" in the prospectus included in Post-Effective Amendment No. 15 to the
Registration Statement on Form N-4 for certain variable annuity insurance
contracts issued through ML of New York Variable Annuity Separate Account A and
included in the prospectus included in Post-Effective Amendment No. 14 to the
Registration Statement on Form N-4 for certain variable annuity insurance
contracts issued through ML of New York Variable Annuity Separate Account B of
Merrill Lynch Life Insurance Company, File Nos. 33-43654 and 33-45380.

                                               /s/ BARRY G. SKOLNICK
                                     -----------------------------------------
                                                 Barry G. Skolnick
                                     SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT AND GENERAL COUNSEL

April 24, 2000
');
	document.write('

## Archived Program Site

- TRIO Dissemination Partnership Program

## Let's Talk TRIO...News You Can Use - TRIO Newsletters

- Spring 2007 download filesMS Word (69K) | PDF (248K)
- Fall 2006 download filesMS Word (82K) | PDF (383K)
- Winter 2005 download filesMS Word (60K) | PDF (246K)
- Fall 2005 download filesMS Word (55K) | PDF (188K)
- Summer 2005 download filesMS Word (56K) | PDF (43K)
- Spring 2005 download filesMS Word (51K) | PDF (42K)
- Winter 2004 download filesMS Word (60K) | PDF (367K)
- Fall 2004 download filesMS Word (55K) | PDF (194K)

TRIO Home
From: Jalil Bishop

To: U.S. Departm ent of Education

Re: Proposed am endm ents to regulatory text which the Departm ent should 

draft

Date: Decem ber 11, 2023

The Departm ent should write regulatory texts that address the following:

1. All Interest -No Caps: Waive the total loan balance amount that exceeds 

the original balance borrowed without caps of $10,000/$20,000.

2. Borrowers who already paid their balance: Waive the original balance 

amount borrowers would have paid off if their payments went to the 

principal balance instead of runaway interest accrual. In other words, 

apply the SAVE plan retroactively without caps of $10,00/$20,000.

3. Rolling Relief: Waiving total ou tstanding student loan balances should 

happen when a loan has been disbursed for 20/25 years, and it should be 

rolling relief every time a loan hits the 20/25 year mark, regardless of 

whether it is on an IDR plan. 

a. Waive authority should not be used one ti me for older loans while 

the Department and its loan servicing agencies currently struggle to 

operate an effective system to which borrowers are legally entitled. 

Evidence

4. Quicker Timelines: Similar to SAVE, which offers quicker relief within 10 

years to borrowers who borrowed $12,000 or less because they are more 

likely to be distressed, t here must be a broad hardship category to apply a 

quicker waive authority to highly distressed borrowers.

a. Pell Grant recipients (students/parents), Age of Borrower, 

Completed Bankruptcy, Years of Default, etc. (See the detailed 

proposals already submitted)

5. Income Caps Income caps for this regulatory text should not be based on 

the federal poverty line of 225%. It should be based on $125,000 for 

individuals and $250,000 for households.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 

PETER KOSTYSHYN, 

 

Defendant, 

Appellant, 

v. 

STATE OF DELAWARE, 

Plaintiff, 

Appellee. 

§ 

§ No. 115, 2019 

§ 

§ Court Below—Superior Court 

§ of the State of Delaware 

§ 

§ Cr. ID No. 0908020496 (N) 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

 

 Submitted: March 28, 2019 

 Decided: April 2, 2019 

ORDER 

On March 12, 2019, the appellant, Peter Kostyshyn, filed a notice of appeal 

from the Superior Court’s rulings, on February 21, 2019, that Kostyshyn was 

competent to address allegations that he violated his probation, granting counsel’s 

motion to withdraw and stating that the Offense of Defense Services would be 

contacted about appointment of new counsel, denying Kostyshyn’s motion for 

recusal, denying Kostyshyn’s motion to modify bail without prejudice, and denying 

Kostyshyn’s other motions. On March 12, 2019, the Senior Court Clerk issued a 

notice directing Kostyshyn to show why this appeal should not be dismissed based 

on: (i) this Court’s lack of jurisdiction to hear a criminal interlocutory appeal; and 

(ii) his failure to comply with this Court’s July 16, 2013 order requiring him to 

include the filing fee or a properly completed motion to proceed in forma pauperis
2

with pro se filings relating to his criminal cases. Kostyshyn failed to respond to the 

notice to show cause within the required the ten-day period, making dismissal 

deemed to be unopposed. 

This is the second interlocutory appeal and third proceeding Kostyshyn has 

instituted in this Court relating to his alleged violation of probation in 2018.1

 If 

Kostyshyn files any additional interlocutory appeals or writs in this Court relating to 

this alleged violation of probation, the Clerk is directed not to docket such filings 

absent leave of the Court. 

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, under Supreme Court Rules 3(b)(2) 

and 29(c), that this appeal is DISMISSED. 

BY THE COURT: 

/s/ Collins J. Seitz, Jr. 

Justice 

 

1 Kostyshyn v. State, 2019 WL 327961, at *1 (Del. Jan. 23, 2019) (dismissing interlocutory appeal 

regarding Kostyshyn’s competency for a contested violation of probation hearing); In re 

Kostyshyn, No. 116, 2019 (petition for a writ of mandamus).
JOE LAMART BROWN

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 1 4

- 4 657

______ _______________________/

Opinion filed July 9, 2015.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Columbia County.

Paul S. Bryan , Judge

.

Joe Lamart Brown, pro se, Appellant

.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Donna A. Gerace, Assistant Attorney

General, Ta llahassee

, for Appellee

.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROBERTS , C.J., BENTON, and LEWIS , JJ., CONCUR.
400 MARYLAND AVE. S.W., WASHINGTON, DC 20202-2600

www.ed.gov 

The Department of Education’s mission is to promote student achievement and preparation for global competitiveness

by fostering educational excellence and ensuring equal access.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES 

October 1, 2020

Honorable Ruth S. Matagi-Tofiga 

Director 

American Samoa Department of Education 

P.O. Box 2609 

Pago Pago, American Samoa 96799 

ruth.matagi-tofiga@doe.as

Dear Director Matagi-Tofiga: 

This letter grants final approval under Section 421(b) of the General Education Provisions Act 

for grant award H027A180012. 

The Department received your August 28, 2020 request on behalf of American Samoa Department 

of Education for a waiver extending the period of availability for Federal fiscal year (FFY) 2018 

Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) Part B grant award funds. 

With this approval, the FFY 2018 IDEA Part B grant award funds will be available for 

obligation through September 30, 2021 and may be liquidated through December 30, 2021. 

Please contact your Office of Special Education Programs State Lead, Genee Norbert at 

Genee.Norbert@ed.gov, if you have any questions.

Sincerely, 

/s/

Mark Schultz 

Commissioner, Rehabilitation Services Administration 

Delegated the authority to perform the functions and duties 

of the Assistant Secretary for the Office of Special 

Education and Rehabilitative Services 

cc: State Director
On November 23, 2012, OCR closed two complaints against the City University of New York (CUNY) because of its operation of a Black Male Initiative (BMI) mentoring and support program.  The complainant had alleged that “Title VI and Title IX do not sanction ‘Black Male Initiatives.’ Period.”  OCR stated that it is not, however, a per se violation of Title VI or Title IX for a postsecondary institution to operate a race-themed and/or gender-themed mentoring and support program. OCR further stated that a race-themed or gender-themed mentoring and support program that does not exclude students on the basis of their race or sex and does not use race- or sex-exclusive recruiting would not be subject to strict scrutiny review and would not violate Title VI.  OCR added that none of the BMI programs or activities excludes persons who are not black and/or male from participating.  As to the complainant’s second complaint, that the BMI programs allegedly discriminated in employment on the basis of both race and sex, OCR said that it has limited jurisdiction to investigate Title VI employment issues, and that neither of its jurisdictional bases were present here. OCR stated that its jurisdiction over claims of sex discrimination in employment is broader under the Title IX regulation, but OCR did not find evidence here to support a claim of sex discrimination in employment. Ultimately, OCR administratively closed the complaints as moot, consistent with OCR’s case processing procedures. 
***Read    the Resolution Letter***PDF

Top
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 10.8

                                 AMENDMENT NO. 1
                          TO SOFTWARE LICENSE AGREEMENT
                                    Tourscape

         This AMENDMENT NO. 1 ("Amendment") to the SOFTWARE LICENSE AGREEMENT
(TOURSCAPE), dated April 26, 1997 (the "Agreement") by and between SunStyle
International Holidays City Center, Suite 303n, 100 Second Avenue South, St.
Petersburg, FL 33701-4301 ("Company"), and The SABRE Group, Inc., a Delaware
corporation located at 4255 Amon Carter Blvd., Fort Worth, Texas 76155
("Sabre"), is entered into effective as of June 1, 1999 (the "Effective Date").

         NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants contained
herein, Sabre and Company hereby agree as follows:

         WHEREAS, Sabre and Company have entered into this Agreement and have
agreed the rates for services should be increased,

         WHEREAS, it is in the best interest of the parties to modify certain
provisions of the Agreement.

         NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants contained
herein, Sabre and Company hereby agree as follows:

1.   MAINTENANCE FEE. The "Maintenance Fee" as defined in the Agreement shall be
     changed to US $150.00 per hour per Sabre representative performing the
     Services. In addition, the parties agree that the Maintenance Fee may be
     adjusted by Sabre each calendar year either in accordance with the
     Agreement or as otherwise agreed to by the parties.

2.   DEFINED TERMS. The defined terms used in this Amendment shall have the same
     meaning assigned to such terms in the Agreement.

3.   FULL FORCE AND EFFECT. Except as otherwise expressly modified herein, all
     other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and
     effect and are hereby ratified and confirmed as it set forth herein
     verbatim.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Company and Sabre have executed this Amendment as
of the Effective Date.

<TABLE>
<S>                                                       <C>
SUNSTYLE INTERNATIONAL HOLIDAYS, LTD.                     THE SABRE GROUP, INC.

By: /s/ D.G. Brandano                                     By:
    -------------------------------------                   --------------------

Name: D.G. Brandano                                       Name:
      -----------------------------------                      -----------------

Title: C.E.O.                                             Title:
       ----------------------------------                      -----------------
</TABLE>
### Re: FAA request for more informat ion from Gulfstream, relative to their petition for exemption from 14 CFR Part 25.981(a)(3) 

### as amended by Amendment 25-102, for the Model G280 Airplane
In August 2011, the FAA sent to and discusse d with Gulfstream the following comments, which required a re-petition from Gulfstream. Gulfstream petition states: GALP has considered installing lightning prot ective caps on top of the sealant as an additional protective feature; however this wa s ruled out as it was not considered as an “independent feature” for pr oviding fault tolerance.
FAA comment: Other applicants have defined structural cracking as well as the fastener failure as single failures for which they are requesting an ex emption. GALP should assure that all single failures are defined and the impracticality of addressing them are included in their request. In addition, GALP should provide a di scussion of the types of design changes that were considered (similar to the additi onal sealant noted above) and why the design modifications were impractical. A fairly detaile d practicality analysis should be provided. GALP should carefully read th e policy memo and provide information such as how manufacturing quality and maintenance are controlled to assure the frequency of occurrence of development of ignition sour ces is controlled to meet the probability requirements in the policy. Gulfstream petition states: Since the G250 is designed to carry less th at 30 passengers and a payload less than 7500 pounds, the applicable flammability re quirements of §25.981 are as amended by
Amendment 25-102.
FAA comment:
This is not the correct criteria for a new type design- size an d payload are not a
consideration- amendment 102 is the correct level.
1

Palma, Elizabeth

From: Spenillo, Justin

Sent: Monday, January 11, 2016 5:37 PM

To: Palma, Elizabeth; Gabrilovich, Lev

Subject: Updated: R10 Exceptional Event Rule/Guidance Clarification Call - Monday 1/11 - Agenda 

and Participants

Agenda

 Role Call

 Clarification of received inquiries

 Reminders of Comment Period Closing date and submittal of any comments to the docket

Participants

 Moderator (EPA R10) – Justin Spenillo

 EPA R10 – Debra Suzuki, Robert Kotchenruther, Chris Hall

 Alaska – Barbara Trost, Kate Slauson

 Oregon – Phil Allen, Larry Calkins, Merlyn Hough

 Idaho – Rick Hardy, Mary Anderson, Mike Edwards, Bruce Louks

 Washington – Laurie Hulse‐Moyer, Jill Schulte, Clint Bowman, Farren Herron‐Thorpe, Melanie Forster, Robin

Priddy, Mike Ragan, Rod Tinnemore