alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 99.3
 AXCESS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
WHISTLEBLOWER POLICY
 Purpose
  
    
    establishes guidance for the receipt, retention, and treatment of verbal or
written reports received by the Company regarding accounting, internal controls,
auditing matters, disclosure, fraud and unethical business practices, whether
submitted by Company employees or third parties (Allegation), and
 
    
    establishes guidance for providing Company employees a means to make Reports in a
confidential and anonymous manner, and
 
    
    makes clear the Companys intention to discipline, up to and including
termination of employment, any person determined to have engaged in retaliatory
behavior,
  Receipt
  Procedures
   i.
    
    Who is the alleged wrongdoer?ii.
    
    How serious is the alleged wrongdoing?iii.
    
    How credible is the allegation of wrongdoing?




---



##### 



Delegation of Authority With In the Audit Committee
  Interpretation
  Retaliation
  Audit Committee Review of Reports
  Reporting Allegations
  Dated and approved by the Board of Directors on this 22 nd day of February 2005.
State tables are available for fiscal years 2023, 2024, and 2025.

 Funds included in the State tables are for Department of Education (Department) programs that allocate funds to States or local educational agencies using statutory formulas. The totals do not reflect all Department funds that a State receives. States and other entities may also receive Department funds awarded on a competitive basis. These tables also include financial support from selected student aid programs that provide funds to postsecondary institutions located in the State, as well as federally supported loans made to students attending postsecondary institutions located in the State.

 Figures for fiscal year 2023 are based on the enacted appropriation; figures for fiscal year 2024 are based on an annualized continuing resolution from the fiscal year 2023 appropriation; fiscal year 2025 figures are based on the President’s budget request. In general, fiscal year 2023 figures are actuals and figures for fiscal years 2024 and 2025 are estimates; however, for a variety of reasons, fiscal year 2023 figures for certain programs may change.

**The data on these tables are for information purposes only and do not constitute any binding agreement on behalf of the U.S. Department of Education.**

- State tables by program*  in    MS Excel [298KB]
- State tables by State*  in    MS Excel [270KB]

Updates to the State tables are posted as a package, rather than on an individual basis.  As a result, changes are not necessarily made to every program or every State each time the tables are updated.  Major updates normally are posted for significant milestones in the appropriations process, such as the President’s Budget Request and enactment of an appropriation, and when the Department makes awards under certain formula grant programs—usually in July and October.

For further information contact the ED Budget Service.

**The Department of Education strives to make all content accessible to everyone. While these documents do not currently meet the standards of Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, Office of Planning, Evaluation, and Policy Development, Budget Service (BS), Budget Policy and Coordination Division is working to create accessible versions.  If you need access to these documents before the accessible versions are available, please contact the Information Technology Accessibility Program Helpdesk at ITAPSUPPORT@ed.gov* for assistance.  Last Modified: 03/15/2024
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

August 27, 2014

N o. 04

- 14

- 00526

- CR

EX PARTE Gregory JONES

,

From the Criminal District Court, Magistrate Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014W0238

Honorable Andrew Carruthers, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

The Appellant ’ s Motion f or Extension of Time to File Brief is hereby GRANTED. The

Appellant ’ s brief is due September 18, 2014.

_________________________________ Marialyn Bar nard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 27th day of August, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Ho ttle

Clerk of Court
EXHIBIT 21





Subsidiaries of Security National


Financial Corporation


as of March 31, 2011








Security National Life Insurance Company





SecurityNational Mortgage Company





Memorial Estates, Inc.





Memorial Mortuary





Paradise Chapel Funeral Home, Inc.





California Memorial Estates, Inc.





Cottonwood Mortuary, Inc.





Deseret Memorial, Inc.





Holladay Cottonwood Memorial Foundation





Holladay Memorial Park, Inc.





Greer-Wilson Funeral Home, Inc.





Crystal Rose Funeral Home, Inc.





Insuradyne Corporation





Security National Funding Company





Security National Capital, Inc.





Memorial Insurance Company of America





C & J Financial, LLC





Southern Security Life Insurance Company (a Mississippi domiciled Company)





Marketing Source Center, Inc. dba Security National Travel Services





Security National Reverse Mortgage of Utah





Security National Funding Company





Select Appraisal Management, Inc.





SNF Direct Lending
Case: 1:12-cv-03233 Document #: 241-3 Filed: 07/14/16 Page 1 of 17 PageID #:5616
Case: 1:12-cv-03233 Document #: 241-3 Filed: 07/14/16 Page 2 of 17 PageID #:5617
Case: 1:12-cv-03233 Document #: 241-3 Filed: 07/14/16 Page 3 of 17 PageID #:5618
Case: 1:12-cv-03233 Document #: 241-3 Filed: 07/14/16 Page 4 of 17 PageID #:5619
Case: 1:12-cv-03233 Document #: 241-3 Filed: 07/14/16 Page 5 of 17 PageID #:5620
Case: 1:12-cv-03233 Document #: 241-3 Filed: 07/14/16 Page 6 of 17 PageID #:5621
Case: 1:12-cv-03233 Document #: 241-3 Filed: 07/14/16 Page 7 of 17 PageID #:5622
Case: 1:12-cv-03233 Document #: 241-3 Filed: 07/14/16 Page 8 of 17 PageID #:5623
Case: 1:12-cv-03233 Document #: 241-3 Filed: 07/14/16 Page 9 of 17 PageID #:5624
Case: 1:12-cv-03233 Document #: 241-3 Filed: 07/14/16 Page 10 of 17 PageID #:5625
Case: 1:12-cv-03233 Document #: 241-3 Filed: 07/14/16 Page 11 of 17 PageID #:5626
Case: 1:12-cv-03233 Document #: 241-3 Filed: 07/14/16 Page 12 of 17 PageID #:5627
Case: 1:12-cv-03233 Document #: 241-3 Filed: 07/14/16 Page 13 of 17 PageID #:5628
Case: 1:12-cv-03233 Document #: 241-3 Filed: 07/14/16 Page 14 of 17 PageID #:5629
Case: 1:12-cv-03233 Document #: 241-3 Filed: 07/14/16 Page 15 of 17 PageID #:5630
Case: 1:12-cv-03233 Document #: 241-3 Filed: 07/14/16 Page 16 of 17 PageID #:5631
Case: 1:12-cv-03233 Document #: 241-3 Filed: 07/14/16 Page 17 of 17 PageID #:5632
#### 1631.205-79 Mandatory statutory reserves.

Charges for mandatory statutory reserves are not allowed unless provided for in the contract. When the term “mandatory statutory reserve” is specifically identified as an allowable contract charge without further definition or explanation, it means a requirement imposed by State law upon the carrier to set aside a specific amount or rate of funds into a restricted reserve that is accounted for separately from all other reserves and surpluses of the carrier and which may be used only with the specific approval of the State official designated by law to make such approvals. The amount chargeable to the contract may not exceed an allocable portion of the amount actually set aside. If the statutory reserve is no longer required for the purpose for which it was created, and these funds become available for the general use of the carrier, a pro rata share based upon FEHBP's contribution to the total carrier's set aside shall be returned to the FEHBP in accordance with FAR 31.201-5.
<PAGE>
                                                                Exhibit 10(d)(7)


                               SEVENTH AMENDMENT
                                    TO THE
                        ICF KAISER INTERNATIONAL, INC.
                                RETIREMENT PLAN


          WHEREAS, the ICF Kaiser International, Inc. Retirement Plan
(hereinafter referred to as the "Plan") was established effective August 1,
1971; and

          WHEREAS, the Plan was recently restated effective January 1, 1996, by
ICF Kaiser International, Inc. (currently known as Kaiser Group International,
Inc. and hereinafter referred to as the "Company"); and

          WHEREAS, the restated Plan was amended subsequently on six occasions;
and

          WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Plan to cease investment of
future contributions in Company Stock;

          NOW, THEREFORE, effective as of April 13, 2000, Section 6.2 of the
Plan is hereby amended to provide as follows:

               6.2 ICF Kaiser Stock Fund. Notwithstanding any other provision of
                   ----------------------
          the Plan to the contrary, effective as of April 13, 2000, no
          Participant shall be permitted to direct the investment of
          contributions made to the Plan after said date or assets in his
          Account invested in Funds, other than the ICF Kaiser Stock Fund, on
          and after said date into the ICF Kaiser Stock Fund. Any Participant
          who has assets in his Account invested in the ICF Kaiser Stock Fund on
          said date may direct the investment of such assets into other Funds
          pursuant to procedures established in conjunction with the
          administration of the Plan.


     Executed this 13th day of April, 2000.
                   ----


                              KAISER GROUP INTERNATIONAL, INC.
                              (formerly known as ICF Kaiser  International,
                              Inc.)


                              By: /s/ James J. Maiwurm
                                 ------------------------------
                              Title:  Chief Executive Officer
## United States Court of Appeals **For the Eighth Circuit**

___________________________ No. 18 -3443

___________________________ United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee

v. Edgar Martinez

- Sanchez

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant

____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Minnesota

____________ Submitted: July 10 , 2020 Filed: July 15, 2020 [Unpublished]

____________ Before KELLY, ERICKSON, and STRA S, Circuit Judges.

____________
PER CURIAM.

Edgar Martinez

- Sanchez pleaded guilty to conspiring to distribute methamphetamine and cocaine, 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 841(b)(1)(A), 846. The plea agreement waived his right to appeal his sentence unless it exceeded 293 months in- 2 - prison. The district court 1 gave him a 210

- month sentence. In an Anders brief, Martinez

- Sanchez’s counsel requests permission to withdraw and raises a Sentencing Guidelines enhancement and the substantive reasonableness of the
sentence as potential issues on appeal. See Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967).

We review the validity and applicability of an appeal waiver de novo. See United States v. Scott , 627 F.3d 702, 704 (8th Cir. 2010). Upon care ful review, we conclude that the waiver in this case is both applicable and enforceable

. See United States v. Andis , 333 F.3d 886, 889

– 92 (8th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (explaining that an appeal waiver will be enforced if the appeal falls within the scope of the waiver, the defendant knowingly and voluntarily entered into the plea agreement and the waiver, and enforcing the waiver would not result in a miscarriage of justice). We have also independently reviewed the record and conclude that no other non

- frivo lous issues exist. See Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75 (1988). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel permission to withdraw.

______________________________

1 The Honorable Joan N. Ericksen, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota.
115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 31 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives 

2 concurring), 

3 SECTION 1. USE OF THE ROTUNDA OF THE CAPITOL FOR 

4 CEREMONY TO AWARD THE CONGRESSIONAL 

5 GOLD MEDAL TO BOB DOLE. 

6 (a) AUTHORIZATION.—The rotunda of the Capitol is 

7 authorized to be used on January 17, 2018, for a cere8 mony to award the Congressional Gold Medal to Bob Dole. 

9 (b) PREPARATIONS.—Physical preparations for the 

10 conduct of the ceremony described in subsection (a) shall 

11 be carried out in accordance with such conditions as may 

12 be prescribed by the Architect of the Capitol. 

Passed the Senate December 20 (legislative day, December 19), 2017. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 
115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 31 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Authorizing the use of the rotunda of the Capitol 

Medal to Bob Dole. for a ceremony to award the Congressional Gold
§ 685.211 Miscellaneous repayment provisions., 34 C.F.R. § 685.211

© 2021 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works. 1

Code of Federal Regulations 

Title 34. Education

Subtitle B. Regulations of the Offices of the Department of Education

Chapter VI. Office of Postsecondary Education, Department of Education

Part 685. William D. Ford Federal Direct Loan Program (Refs & Annos)

Subpart B. Borrower Provisions

34 C.F.R. § 685.211

§ 685.211 Miscellaneous repayment provisions.

Effective: July 1, 2014

Currentness

...

(d) Default—

(1) Acceleration. If a borrower defaults on a Direct Loan, the entire unpaid balance and accrued interest are immediately 

due and payable.

(12) Collection charges. If a borrower defaults on a Direct Loan, the Secretary assesses collection charges in accordance 

with § 685.202(e).

(32) Collection of a defaulted loan.

(i) The Secretary may take any action authorized by law to collect a defaulted Direct Loan including, but not limited to, 

filing a lawsuit against the borrower, reporting the default to nationwide consumer reporting agencies, requesting the 

Internal Revenue Service to offset the borrower’s Federal income tax refund, and garnishing the borrower’s wages. Any 

amount collected per month though this section shall be determined by taking the lesser of the amount calculated under § 

685.208 (b) or (c), § 685.209, or § 685.221. 

(ii) [New Pathway Out of Default]

(A)If a borrower defaults on a Direct Subsidized Loan, a Direct Unsubsidized Loan, a Direct Consolidation Loan, or a 

student Direct PLUS Loan, the Secretary may designate the income-contingent repayment plan or the income-based 

repayment plan for the borrower.
§ 685.211 Miscellaneous repayment provisions., 34 C.F.R. § 685.211

© 2021 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works. 2

(B) A borrower in may request that the Secretary designate the income-contingent repayment plan or the income-based 

repayment plan to repay the borrower’s defaulted Direct Loans. Upon making a payment under § 685.209 or § 685.221, 

the loan will not be considered in default and will no longer be subject to the penalties of default.
1425.103 Exceptions. ( a ) The AS/PMB is authorized to make the determination that a foreign end item will be acquired for Government use because preference for a U.S. item would be inconsistent with the public interest. Such determinations shall be prepared by the CO and submitted by the HCA to the Director, PAM for further action.
( b ) The Director, PAM is authorized to make the determination that an article, material or supply not included in the list under FAR 25.104 is not mined, produced, or manufactured in the U.S. in sufficient and reasonably available commercial quantities of satisfactory quality. Determinations shall be prepared by the CO and submitted by the BPC for approval.
( c ) Contracting activities which have information justifying the removal of an item from the list under FAR 25.104 shall submit such information to the Director, PAM for further disposition.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

JUSTIN TAYLOR, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. )

)

REGIONAL ACCEPTANCE CORP., )

)

Defendants. )

12 cv 01694

Assigned Judge: 

Robert W. Gettleman

Designated Magistrate Judge: 

Sheila M. Finnegan

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by plaintiff Justin Taylor (“plaintiff”), 

and defendant Regional Acceptance Corp. (“Regional Acceptance”), through their respective 

counsel, that, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii): (a) plaintiff’s individual claims against 

Regional are hereby dismissed without prejudice with leave to reinstate by May 31, 2012 after 

which the dismissal will be with prejudice; (b) the claims of the members of the putative classes 

identified in the Complaint and in the Motion for Class Certification are hereby dismissed 

without prejudice and without notice to the putative classes; and (c) each party shall bear his, her, 

or its own costs and expenses, including attorneys’ fees (except as otherwise agreed to by the 

parties).

/s/ Keith J. Keogh /S/ /s/John F. Costello, Jr.

Keith J. Keogh

Keogh Law, Ltd.

101 N. Wacker Dr., Suite 605

Chicago, IL 60606

Telephone: (312) 726-1092

Keith@Keoghlaw.com

Counsel for Justin Taylor

Clinton E. Cameron 

John F. Costello, Jr.

TROUTMAN SANDERS LLP

55 W. Monroe St., Suite 3000

Chicago, IL 60606

(312) 759-1920 - Telephone

john.costello@troutmansanders.com

Counsel for Regional Acceptance Corp.

Dated: May 10, 2012

Case: 1:12-cv-01694 Document #: 15 Filed: 05/10/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:54
217.174 Multiyear contracts for electricity from renewable energy sources. ( a ) The head of the contracting activity may enter into a contract for a period not to exceed 10 years for the purchase of electricity from sources of renewable energy, as that term is defined in section 203(b)(2) of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (42 U.S.C. 15852(b)(2)).
( b ) *Limitations.* The head of the contracting activity may exercise the authority in paragraph (a) of this section to enter into a contract for a period in excess of 5 years only if the head of the contracting activity determines, on the basis of a business case analysis (see PGI 217.174 for a business case analysis template and guidance) prepared by the requiring activity, that— ( 1 ) The proposed purchase of electricity under such contract is cost effective; and
( 2 ) It would not be possible to purchase electricity from the source in an economical manner without the use of a contract for a period in excess of 5 years.
( c ) Nothing in this section shall be construed to preclude the DoD from using other multiyear contracting authority of DoD to purchase renewable energy.
[75 FR 34943, June 21, 2010. Redesignated and amended at 76 FR 58154, Sept. 20, 2011]
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION
TRUSTEES OF THE SUBURBAN TEAMSTERS )
OF NORTHERN ILLINOIS WELFARE AND )
PENSION FUNDS, )
)
Plaintiffs, )
) No. 12C 1853
v. )
) Judge John Lee
BOLINGBROOK REDI-MIX COMPANY )
an Illinois corporation and ) Magistrate Judge Schenkier
ROBERT A. BRIGHT, Individually, )
)
Defendants. )

MOTION FOR DEFAULT & JUDGMENT IN SUM CERTAIN

NOW COME the Plaintiffs, TRUSTEES OF THE SUBURBAN TEAMSTERS OF
NORTHERN ILLINOIS WELFARE AND PENSION FUNDS, by and through their
attorneys, JOHN J. TOOMEY, and ARNOLD AND KADIJAN, and, pursuant to FRCP 55,
move for entry of an order of default and judgment in sum certain. In support of their
Motion, Plaintiffs state as follows:

1. Suit was filed on March 24, 2012 for collection of delinquent ERISA
contributions, plus attorneys’ fees, costs, and interest, under 29 U.S.C. 1132(g)(2).

2. Service was made upon Bolingbrook Redi-Mix Company, an Illinois
corporation, on March 26, 2012, and a copy of the proof of service was filed with the court
on April 4, 2012.

3. Service was made upon Robert A. Bright, Individually, on March 26, 2012,
and a copy of the proof of service was filed with the court on April 4, 2012.

4. Counsel for Defendants filed their Appearance on April 20, 2012.

5. At the April 26, 2012 status hearing, the Court ordered the parties to seek a
resolution by May 10, 2012 and if no settlement is reached, Defendants were given to May

31, 2012 to file their Answer. No Answer has been filed by the Defendants.


6. More than 21 days have passed without any response to the Complaint by

Defendants, so Defendants are now in default.

7. On June 12, 2012 counsel discussed possible resolution and Defendants’
counsel suggested that Plaintiffs file a Motion for Default and Judgment in Sum Certain.

8. As supported by the attached Affidavits, the sums due on the Complaint

are:

$117,782.77 Pension audit
$15,359.04 Welfare audit
$39,553.67 Pension Fund installment note
$5,922.97 Welfare Fund installment note
$925.00 Attorneys fees
$439.00 Court costs
$179,982.35

WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs pray for the entry of an Judgment Order in favor of the

Plaintiffs Trustees of the Suburban Teamsters of Northern Illinois Welfare and Pension

Funds as follows:

A Judgment against Defendant, Bolingbrook Redi-Mix Company, an Illinois

corporation in the amount of $179,982.35 on Counts | and II;

B. Judgment against Defendant, ROBERT A. BRIGHT, Individually on Count
III in the amount of $45,476.54, jointly and severally with the corporation.

TRUSTEES OF THE SUBURBAN TEAMSTERS
OF NORTHERN ILLINOIS WELFARE AND
PENSION FUNDS

s/John J. Toomey

ARNOLD AND KADJAN

203 N. LaSalle Street, Suite 1650
Chicago, IL 60601

Telephone No.: (312) 236-0415
Facsimile No.: (312) 341-0438
Dated: June 13, 2012
USGS HomeContact USGSSearch USGS
U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2009-1001

Geological Interpretation of the Sea Floor Offshore of Edgartown, Massachusetts

Title | List of Figures | Conversion Factors | Abstract | Introduction | Setting | Methods | Bathymetry | Sidescan Sonar | Seismic Profiles | Sediments | Bottom Photography | Data Catalog | Summary | Acknowledgments | References Cited | Contacts

Figure 9. The RESON Seabat 8125 hull-mounted in the keel cut out       of National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Launch 1014.   

AccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPolicies and Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological SurveyURL: http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2009/1001/html/fig9.htmlPage Contact Information: GS Pubs Web ContactPage Last Modified: Thursday, 22-Apr-2010 15:28:21 EDT
Case: 1:12-cv-01887 Document #: 14-6 Filed: 09/04/12 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:309
Case: 1:12-cv-01887 Document #: 14-6 Filed: 09/04/12 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:310
Case: 1:12-cv-01887 Document #: 14-6 Filed: 09/04/12 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:311
<PAGE>


                                                                        Page 23

EXHIBIT 32.2


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


        In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Cato Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended November 1, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael
O. Moore, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. sec. 1350 as adopted pursuant to Sec.
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that (1) The Report fully complies with
the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

Date:  December 15, 2003


/s/ Michael O. Moore
------------------------------------------------
Michael O. Moore
Executive Vice President
Chief Financial Officer and Secretary





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to The Cato Corporation and will be
retained by The Cato Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.