alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EERE Information Center

Search Help More Search Options

Printable Version

Small Electric Motors

Preliminary Technical Support

Document

This page presents the chapters, reports, and

appendices from the preliminary technical

support document, which provides the

analyses and results supporting the notice of

public meeting and data availability for small

electric motors.

The following documents are available as

Adobe Acrobat PDFs. Download Adobe Reader.

Title Page (PDF 59 KB)

List of Acronyms and Abbreviations

(PDF 66 KB)

Executive Summary (PDF 236 KB)

Chapters

Chapter 1: Introduction (PDF 144 KB)

Chapter 2: Analytical Framework

(PDF 149 KB)

Chapter 3: Market and Technology

Assessment (PDF 592 KB)

Chapter 4: Screening Analysis (PDF 208

KB)

Chapter 5: Engineering Analysis

(PDF 348 KB)

Chapter 6: Energy Use Characterization

(PDF 88 KB)

Chapter 7: Markups for Equipment Price

Determination (PDF 164 KB)

Chapter 8: Life-Cycle Cost and Payback

Period Analysis (PDF 776 KB)

Chapter 9: Shipments Analysis (PDF 256

KB)

Chapter 10: National Impact Analysis

(PDF 212 KB)

Chapter 11: Life-Cycle Cost Sub-Group

Analysis (PDF 24 KB)

Chapter 12: Manufacturer Impact

Analysis (PDF 212 KB)

Chapter 13: Utility Impact Analysis

(PDF 32 KB)

Chapter 14: Employment Impact

Analysis (PDF 28 KB)

Reports

Environmental Assessment (PDF 40 KB)

Regulatory Impact Analysis (PDF 36 KB)

Appendices

Appliances and Commercial Equipment Standards: Small Electric Motors... http://www1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/appliance_standards/commercial...

1 of 2 1/27/2009 1:09 PM

EERE-2007-BT-STD-0007 COMMENT 07.2
Appendix 5A: Construction and

Performance Specifications of Small

Electric Motors Designed for the

Engineering Analysis (PDF 452 KB)

Appendix 8A: User Instruction for

Life-Cycle Cost Spreadsheet (PDF 28

KB)

Appendix 10A: User Instruction for

National Impact Analysis Spreadsheet

(PDF 24 KB)

Appendix 12A: Small Motors

Manufacturers' Interview Guide

(PDF 400 KB)

Appendix 12B: Addendum to

Manufacturer Interview Guide (PDF 164

KB)

Appendix 12C: National Shipments

Estimates for Small Electric Motors

(PDF 176 KB)

Printable Version

Building Technologies Program Home | EERE Home | U.S. Department of Energy

Webmaster | Web Site Policies | Security & Privacy | USA.gov

Content Last Updated: 01/22/2009

Appliances and Commercial Equipment Standards: Small Electric Motors... http://www1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/appliance_standards/commercial...

2 of 2 1/27/2009 1:09 PM

EERE-2007-BT-STD-0007 COMMENT 07.2
#### 2122.170 Contract clauses.

The provisions at FAR sections 52.222-21, 52.222-22, 52-222.25 are implemented by changing the word “offeror” to “Contractor” and the word “solicitation” to “contract” wherever they appear in the text to reflect the FEGLI Program's statutory exemption from competitive bidding (5 U.S.C. 8709), which obviates the issuance of solicitations.

[58 FR 40377, July 28, 1993]
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 10.11

                                  ASSIGNMENT

     This Assignment is made this ____ day of ____________, 2000, between
APPLIED POWER INC., a Wisconsin corporation with its principal place of business
at 6101 N. Baker Road, Milwaukee, WI 53209 USA ("Assignor")
and WRIGHT LINE INC., a Massachusetts corporation with its principal place of
business at 160 Gold Star Boulevard, Worcester, MA 01606 USA ("Assignee").

     WHEREAS, Assignor is the record title holder of the Patents and Patent
Applications listed on Exhibit A hereto (hereafter "the Patents and Patent
Applications");

     WHEREAS, Assignor and Assignee have entered into various agreements in
order to effect a spin off including a Contribution Agreement, Plan and
Agreement of Reorganization and Distribution (the "Plan"); and

     WHEREAS, Assignee is desirous of acquiring record title of the Patents and
Patent Applications under the Plan.

     NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of good and valuable consideration,
receipt whereof by Assignor is hereby acknowledged, Assignor hereby sells,
assigns and transfers unto Assignee, its successors and assigns, its entire
right, title and interest in and to the Patents and Patent Applications
including all continuations, divisions, reissues and reexaminations thereof, the
inventions described therein, all patents which issue from any of the aforesaid
Patent Applications, and all patents and patent applications which claim
priority of any of the Patents and Patent Applications; together with all rights
to profits, royalties and damages for past and future infringement of any of the
Patents and Patent Applications by any party and all rights to sue for and
collect such profits, royalties and damages.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, APPLIED POWER INC. and WRIGHT LINE INC. have caused
this Assignment to be executed by their duly authorized officer this ______ day
of ______________, 2000.

                         APPLIED POWER INC.  (Assignor)


                         By  ____________________________________



                         WRIGHT LINE INC. (Assignee)


                         By  ___________________


<PAGE>

STATE OF WISCONSIN  )
                    ) SS
COUNTY OF MILWAUKEE)


     Before me on this _____ day of ____________, 2000, came
_________________________, to me known to be the person named in the foregoing
assignment and that the execution thereof is acknowledged to be his\her free act
and deed.

(SEAL)                        _________________________________
                              Notary Public,
                              State of Wisconsin
                              My Commission Expires____________

                                      -2-
#### Robert Foxluger et al., Appellants, v. State of New York, Respondent.

(Claim No. 34544.)

Decision, handed down December 30, 1960 *[ante,*p. 716), insofar as it denied permission to appeal as a poor person rescinded and motion to prosecute appeal as a poor person granted.
M. P. No. 74-289.

#### State *v.*Frederick E. McKenney, Jr.

*Richard J. Israel,*Attorney-General, *Donald P. Ryan,*Asst. Attorney General, for plaintiff-respondent. *Edward John Mulligan,*for defendant-petitioner.

Petition for writ of certiorari is denied.

*State*v. *Keegan,*113 R. I. 923, 320 A.2d 618 (1974).
#### 1403.570-3 Contract clause.

CO's shall include the clause at 1452.203-70, Restriction on Endorsements, in all solicitations, contracts and agreements which are not executed in accordance with FAR Parts 12 or 13.
**Overview**		The  Office for Civil Rights (OCR) enforces several federal civil rights laws that  prohibit discrimination in programs or activities that receive federal  financial assistance from the Department of Education. Discrimination on the  basis of race, color, and national origin is prohibited by Title  VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964; sex  discrimination is prohibited by Title IX of  the Education Amendments of 1972; discrimination on the basis of disability is  prohibited by Section 504 of the  Rehabilitation Act of 1973; and age discrimination is prohibited by the Age  Discrimination Act of 1975. OCR also has  responsibilities under Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, which prohibits disability discrimination by  public entities, whether or not they receive federal financial assistance. In  addition, as of January 8, 2002, OCR enforces the Boy Scouts of America  Equal Access Act (Section 9525 of the Elementary  and Secondary Education Act of 1965, as amended by the No Child Left Behind Act  of 2001). Under the Boy Scouts of America Equal Access Act, no public  elementary school or State or local education agency that provides an opportunity  for one or more outside youth or community groups to meet on school premises or  in school facilities before or after school hours shall deny equal access or a  fair opportunity to meet to, or discriminate against, any group officially  affiliated with the Boy Scouts of America, or any other youth group listed in  Title 36 of the United States Code as a patriotic society.These  civil rights laws enforced by OCR extend to all state education agencies,  elementary and secondary school systems, colleges and universities, vocational  schools, proprietary schools, state vocational rehabilitation agencies,  libraries, and museums that receive U.S. Department of Education funds. Areas  covered may include, but are not limited to: admissions, recruitment, financial  aid, academic programs, student treatment and services, counseling and  guidance, discipline, classroom assignment, grading, vocational education,  recreation, physical education, athletics, housing, and employment.

----

            - Race, Color, or National Origin Discrimination
            - Sex Discrimination
            - Disability Discrimination
            - Age Discrimination
            - Boy Scouts of America Equal Access Act
            - Retaliation
|   | (1) | The      accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter      ended November 29, 2008, fully complies with the requirements of Section      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;  and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the accompanying Report fairly presents, in all      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of      the Company. |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/ Fred R. Adams, Jr.                                                 |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Fred      R. Adams, Jr.                                                |
| Chairman      of the Board and Chief Executive Officer                 |
|                                                                   |
| /s/ Timothy A. Dawson                                                  |
| Timothy      A. Dawson                                                 |
| Vice      President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and  Secretary |

----
2004 Decisions

Opinions of the United

States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

2-4-2004

USA v. Austin

Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential

Docket No. 02-3308

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2004

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2004 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

Recommended Citation

"USA v. Austin" (2004). 2004 Decisions. Paper 1028.

http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2004/1028
NOT PRECEDENTIAL

THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

___________

No. 02-3308

___________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs.

JAMES AUSTIN

Appellant.

___________

ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

(D.C. Criminal No. 01-cr-00130-1)

District Judge: The Honorable Petrese B. Tucker

___________

Submitted Under Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a)

January 26, 2004

BEFORE: NYGAARD, FUENTES, and STAPLETON, Circuit Judges.

(Filed: February 4, 2004)

___________
1

OPINION OF THE COURT

___________

NYGAARD, Circuit Judge.

Appellant James Austin pleaded guilty to seven counts related to trafficking

in crack cocaine. The District Court sentenced the Appellant to ninety-seven months

imprisonment. Austin filed a notice of appeal, pro se, and his appointed counsel, Jeremy

C. Gelb, Esq., filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).

Counsel indicated that there are no non-frivolous issues for appeal.

We have carefully reviewed the Appellant’s brief, along with the responsive

brief of the United States and other matters of record. Austin did not file a pro se brief. 

We conclude, after our own review of the entire record, that the District Court did not err. 

Accordingly, the judgment of the District Court will be affirmed.

The motion of defense counsel to withdraw will be granted.

_________________________

TO THE CLERK:

Please file the foregoing opinion.

/s/ Richard L. Nygaard

_________________________________

Circuit Judge
(April 24, 1962)

#### In the Matter of Cedar Lane Heights Corp., Respondent, v. John Marotta, as Building Inspector of the Town of Ossining, Appellant.

Motion by appellant for a stay of order directing the issuance of a building permit, pending appeal from such order. Upon appellant’s stipulation, set forth in the letter of the Town Attorney, dated April 23, 1962, to the effect that the zoning ordinance will remain in *status quo*pending determination of this appeal, the motion is granted, on condition that the appeal be perfected and argued on April 27, 1962; appeal ordered on the calendar for said date. The appeal will be heard on the original papers and on the typewritten briefs of the respective parties; the appellant’s brief to include a copy of the opinion rendered by the court below. Each party is directed to file six copies of his typewritten brief and to serve one copy on the other prior to the argument of the appeal. Beldock, P. J., Christ, Hill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.1



                        CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT


I, John J. Holland, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Butler Manufacturing
Company, certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1)    The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period
       ended March 31, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements
       of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (15
       U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
       respects, the financial condition, and results of operations of the
       Company.




May 15, 2003                                /s/ John J. Holland
------------                               ------------------------------------
Dated                                      John J. Holland
                                           Chairman and Chief Executive Officer



A signed original of this written statement required by section 906 has been
provided to Butler Manufacturing Company and will be retained by the company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



                                       23
<PAGE>

                                                                 Exhibit 23.1


CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-
K) of Genentech, Inc. of our report dated January 20, 1999, included in the 
1998 Annual Report to Stockholders of Genentech, Inc.

Our audits also included the financial statement schedule of Genentech, Inc. 
listed in Item 14(a).  This schedule is the responsibility of the Company's 
management.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our audits.  
In our opinion, the financial statement schedule referred to above, when 
considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, 
presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration 
Statements pertaining to the 1991 Employee Stock Plan, the 1996 Stock 
Option/Stock Incentive Plan, the 1994 Stock Option Plan, the 1990 Stock 
Option/Stock Incentive Plan, the 1984 Incentive Stock Option Plan and the 
1984 Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan, the shares issuable to certain 
convertible subordinated debenture holders, the Genentech, Inc. Tax Reduction 
Investment Plan and in the related Prospectuses of our report dated January 
20, 1999, with respect to the consolidated financial statements incorporated 
herein by reference, and our report included in the preceding paragraph with 
respect to the financial statement schedule included in this Annual Report 
(Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1998.


                                                       Ernst & Young LLP




San Jose, California
January 20, 1999
Page 23
EXHIBIT 32.2
CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT
I, Michael O. Moore, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer andSecretary of The Cato Corporation, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, U.S.C. Section 1350, that on the date of thisCertification:
1. the Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended October 30, 2004 fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and 2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.   Date: December 6, 2004     /s/ Michael O. Moore  Michael O. Moore  Executive Vice President  Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
<PAGE>
                                                     Exhibit 24


                      PP&L RESOURCES, INC.
               PENNSYLVANIA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY

                        l995 ANNUAL REPORT
            TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                           ON FORM l0-K

                        POWER OF ATTORNEY

	The undersigned directors of PP&L Resources, Inc. and 
Pennsylvania Power & Light Company, both Pennsylvania 
corporations, which are to file with the Securities and Exchange 
Commission, Washington, D.C., under the provisions of the 
Securities Exchange Act of l934, as amended, their 1995 Annual 
Report on Form l0-K, do hereby appoint William F. Hecht, R. E. 
Hill and Robert J. Grey their true and lawful attorney, and each 
of them their true and lawful attorney, with power to act without 
the other and with full power of substitution and resubstitution, 
to execute for them and in their names said Form l0-K Report and 
any and all amendments thereto, whether said amendments add to, 
delete from or otherwise alter said Form l0-K Report, or add or 
withdraw any exhibits or schedules to be filed therewith and any 
and all instruments in connection therewith.  The undersigned 
hereby grant to said attorneys and each of them full power and 
authority to do and perform in the name of and on behalf of the 
undersigned, and in any and all capacities, any act and thing 
whatsoever required or necessary to be done in and about the 
premises, as fully and to all intents and purposes as the 
undersigned might do, hereby ratifying and approving the acts of 
said attorneys and each of them.


	IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have hereunto set 
their hands and seals this 28th day of February, l996.


/s/ E. Allen Deaver         L.S.  /s/ Stuart Heydt       L.S.
E. Allen Deaver                    Stuart Heydt



/s/ Nance K. Dicciani       L.S.  /s/ Clifford L. Jones  L.S.
Nance K. Dicciani                  Clifford L. Jones



/s/ William J. Flood        L.S.  /s/ John T. Kauffman   L.S.
William J. Flood                   John T. Kauffman



/s/ Daniel G. Gambet        L.S.  /s/ Robert Y. Kaufman  L.S.
Daniel G. Gambet                   Robert Y. Kaufman



/s/ Elmer D. Gates          L.S.  /s/ F. A. Long         L.S.
Elmer D. Gates                     F. A. Long



/s/ Derek C. Hathaway       L.S.  /s/ Norman Robertson   L.S.
Derek C. Hathaway                  Norman Robertson



/s/ William F. Hecht        L.S.  /s/ David L. Tressler  L.S.
William F. Hecht                   David L. Tressler
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 (2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 /s/ Michael H. GoldbergMichael H. GoldbergPresident and Chief Executive
OfficerAugust 4, 2010/s/ Scott F. StephensScott F. StephensVice President and Chief
Financial OfficerAugust 4, 2010   E-3
Case: 1:12-cv-03724 Document #: 1-2 Filed: 05/15/12 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:14

Case: 1:12-cv-03724 Document #: 1-2 Filed: 05/15/12 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:15
U.S. Dept Commerce/NOAA/NMFS/NWFSC/PublicationsAppendix Figure 3. General topography of the area at RKm 82.6 (County Line Park), Columbia River, selected for observation during the juvenile salmonid stranding survey, 1992 and 1993.
#### PEOPLE, Respondent, v. HAND et al., Appellants.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

November 13, 1903.)

Proceeding by the people of the state of New York against Robert Hand and others.

No opinion. Motion granted.
## FY 2023

The Omnibus Appropriations Act of 2023 (the Act) includes Congressionally directed spending entitled Congressionally Funded Community Projects. The Act identifies these projects with the dollar amounts and a brief explanatory statement about the project for which funds must be used. Directed spending includes $429,587,000 for the projects.  A summary of the projects to be funded and the recipients are listed below.  

Annual Performance Report/ Final Performance Report Technical Assistance webinar of the ED524B form.

## Contact Information

Email: CongressionallyDirectedGrants-OPE@ed.gov

Each project will be assigned to a program specialist. The assigned program specialist will be listed on the List of Recipients soon.

## 
Applicant Information 

## 
List of House and Senate Recipients

### FY 2022 for Historical Purposes 

## Introduction

The Omnibus Appropriations Act of 2022 (the Act) includes Congressionally directed spending (earmarks) entitled Congressionally Funded Community Projects. The Act identifies these earmarks with the dollar amounts and a brief explanatory statement about the project for which funds must be used. The funds for earmarks are broken down as follows: $140 million for the Office of Elementary and Secondary Education, $249 million for the Office of Postsecondary Education (OPE), and $2.3 million for the Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services. Information on this page is for OPE earmarks. A complete list of earmarks can be found below.

## Contact Information

Email: CongressionallyDirectedGrants-OPE@ed.gov

Each earmark will be assigned to a program specialist. The assigned program specialist will be listed on the List of Earmarks soon.

## Postsecondary Earmarks

Applicant Information 

List of House and Senate Recipients

FY 2022 Higher Education Congressionally Funded Community Projects Frequently Asked Questions (PDF, 237K)