alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS, EASTERN DIVISION

JACK HAUGHT, individually and on behalf 

of all others similarly situated,

Plaintiff,

v.

MOTOROLA MOBILITY, INC., a Delaware 

corporation, 

Defendant.

Case No. 1:12-cv-02515

Honorable Virginia M. Kendall

NOTICE OF MOTION

TO: See attached certificate of service.

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on November 20, 2014 at 9:00 a.m., or as soon thereafter 

as counsel may be heard, the undersigned shall appear before the Honorable Virginia M. 

Kendall, or any judge sitting in her stead, in Courtroom 2319 of the Everett McKinley Dirksen 

United States Courthouse, 219 South Dearborn Street, Chicago, Illinois 60604, and then and 

there present Plaintiff Haught’s Motion for Final Approval of Class Action Settlement, a true 

and accurate copy of which is attached and hereby served on you.

* * *

JACK HAUGHT, individually and on behalf of all 

others similarly situated,

Dated: October 31, 2014 By: /s/ Benjamin H. Richman

One of Plaintiff’s Attorneys
2

Jay Edelson

jedelson@edelson.com

Rafey S. Balabanian

rbalabanian@edelson.com

Benjamin H. Richman

brichman@edelson.com

Christopher L. Dore

cdore@edelson.com

EDELSON PC

350 North LaSalle Street, Suite 1300

Chicago, Illinois 60604

Tel: 312.589.6370

Fax: 312.589.6378
3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, Benjamin H. Richman, an attorney, hereby certify that on October 31, 2014, I served 

the above and foregoing Notice of Motion, by causing a true and accurate copy of such paper to 

be filed and transmitted to all counsel of record via the Court’s CM/ECF electronic filing system, 

on this the 31st day of October 2014.

/s/ Benjamin H. Richman
USGS HomeContact USGSSearch USGS
U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2009-1001

Geological Interpretation of the Sea Floor Offshore of Edgartown, Massachusetts

Title | List of Figures | Conversion Factors | Abstract | Introduction | Setting | Methods | Bathymetry | Sidescan Sonar | Seismic Profiles | Sediments | Bottom Photography | Data Catalog | Summary | Acknowledgments | References Cited | Contacts

Figure 35. The slippersnail (Crepidula) shell bed on       the bottom at station E22 northeast of the tip of the seaward extension of       Middle Flats. Station location is shown in figures 15 and 29. 

AccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPolicies and Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological SurveyURL: http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2009/1001/html/fig35.htmlPage Contact Information: GS Pubs Web ContactPage Last Modified: Thursday, 22-Apr-2010 15:09:15 EDT
Certifications:

I, Joseph F. Kruy, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10QSB of Cambex Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being
prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls;
and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls
or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any
corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses.

Date: May 24, 2004

/s/ Joseph F. Kruy
Joseph F. Kruy
President and Treasurer
(principal executive officer and principal financial officer)





2
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Rethinking leadership and"whole of government" national security reform : problems, progress,and prospects**
 
PDF | Mobi | ePub
 
SuDoc Number:D 101.146:L 46/3
Item Number:0307-A-31 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000689642
 
January 10, 2020
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains restated summary financial information extracted from
the balance sheet, statement of income, statement of retained earnings and
statement of cash flows contained in Form 10-K of Cambridge Electric Light
Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1998 and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<CIK> 0000016573
<NAME> CAMBRIDGE ELECTRIC LIGHT COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                            <C>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                   DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         YEAR
<BOOK-VALUE>                      PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>           94,400
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>          9,911
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>              44,794
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>            72,384
<OTHER-ASSETS>                      35,411
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     256,930
<COMMON>                             8,665
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>           27,953
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                 16,182
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>      52,800
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                    0
<PREFERRED>                              0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                 7,301
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                       0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>           0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>       10,100
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>              0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                         0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>     186,729
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>      256,930
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>          118,707
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                 3,423
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>         105,316
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>         108,739
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>              9,968
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                   2,236
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>      12,204
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>             3,383
<NET-INCOME>                         8,821
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>              0
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>        8,821
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>             4,246
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>            1,442
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>              11,207
<EPS-BASIC>                            0
<EPS-DILUTED>                            0



</TABLE>
(June 30, 1964)

#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Lawrence A. Jackson, Appellant.

*Per Curiam.*

The psychiatric examination directed by our decision of December 27, 1963 (20 A D 2d 170) was performed by two highly qualified psychiatrists. These expert physicians, in a report dated May 27, 1964, state that as far as they are able to ascertain defendant has not been predisposed to crimes of violence; and have concluded that further imprisonment will have an aggravating effect upon him, that he is not dangerous to be released now, and that the sooner custodial care is stopped the better he will be. Specifically, in answer to the question posed in the court’s opinion, they report that the defendant does not present a probable behavior pattern that would render it dangerous to release him at this time. In view of these facts, the sentencing of the defendant to a term of from one day to life imprisonment under section 483-b and section 1940 of the Penal Law is not warranted.

Judgment of conviction modified, on the law and the facts, and in the interests of justice, insofar as the same imposes sentence so as to provide that defendant be imprisoned in State prison at Attica for a term of not less than 5 nor more than 10 years; and the matter remanded to the County Court of Cortland County for further proceedings in conformity herewith. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds and Taylor, JJ., concur.
Appeal No. 75-21.

#### Alexandro G. Morelli, Sr. *et al. v.*Mark M. Manoogian, Sr. *et al.*

*S. Thomas Cotroneo,*for plaintiffs. *Swan, Keeney, Jenckes & Asquith, Harry W. Asquith, Edward W. Moses,*for defendants.

No cause having been shown why defendants’ appeal should not be dismissed, the appeal dismissed.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6.1.1.2

Eastern Division

Jacques Rivera

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:12−cv−04428

Honorable Joan B. Gottschall

Reynaldo Guevara, et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Thursday, September 21, 2017:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Joan B. Gottschall: Plaintiff's agreed motion

for leave to file nunc pro tunc two business days late his oversized response brief [314] is

granted. Plaintiff's response is deemed timely filed. Defendant's reply is due 10/16/17.

Motion hearing set for 9/22/17 is stricken; no appearance required. Mailed notice(mjc, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:12-cv-04428 Document #: 320 Filed: 09/21/17 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:24083
AD Economic Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2009-0482 Directorate ID: 2008-SW-54-AD

Helicopter Model: Eurocopter Deutschland GmbH Model EC135 Helicopters

Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 189 Helicopters in the US Registry.

Reason: Main Rotor Blade Vibrations

Costs:

Parts per Helicopter $574

Labor per Helicopter

(8 x $85/work-hour)

$680

Other (Explain)

Total Cost per Helicopter $ 1,254

Total US Fleet Cost $237,006

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No ()

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No ()

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

Yes ( ) No ()

Project Engineer: Chinh Vuong
19.811-3 Contract clauses. ( a ) The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 52.219-11, Special 8(a) Contract Conditions, in contracts between the SBA and the agency when the acquisition is accomplished using the procedures of 19.811-1(a) and (b).
( b ) The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 52.219-12, Special 8(a) Subcontract Conditions, in contracts between the SBA and its 8(a) contractor when the acquisition is accomplished using the procedures of 19.811-1(a) and (b).
( c ) The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 52.219-17, Section 8(a) Award, in competitive solicitations and contracts when the acquisition is accomplished using the procedures of 19.805 and in sole source awards which utilize the alternative procedure in 19.811-1(c).
( d ) The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 52.219-18, Notification of Competition Limited to Eligible 8(a) Participants, in competitive solicitations and contracts when the acquisition is accomplished using the procedures of 19.805. Use the clause at 52.219-18 with its Alternate I when competition is to be limited to 8(a) participants within one or more specific SBA districts pursuant to 19.804-2.
( e ) For contracts or orders resulting from this subpart, see 19.507(e) for use of 52.219-14, Limitations on Subcontracting, and 19.507(h) for use of 52.219-33, Nonmanufacturer Rule.
[54 FR 46005, Oct. 31, 1989, as amended at 55 FR 3883, Feb. 5, 1990; 55 FR 25529, June 21, 1990; 60 FR 48263, Sept. 18, 1995; 61 FR 39209, July 26, 1996; 61 FR 67421, Dec. 20, 1996; 76 FR 68035, Nov. 2, 2011; 82 FR 4730, Jan. 13, 2017; 85 FR 11766, Feb. 27, 2020; 86 FR 44243, Aug. 11, 2021]
Exhibit 32.1

 

**Certification of Chairman of the Board and President **

**Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code**

I, Gary L. Martin, Chairman of the Board and President of Capital Southwest Corporation, certify that, to my knowledge:

| 1. |   |   | the Form 10-Q, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 6, 2009 (“accompanied report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |   |   |
|----|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|    |        |        |                                                                                                                                                                                                                               |        |        |
| 2. |   |   | the information contained in the accompanied report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of Capital Southwest Corporation.                                    |   |   |

 

| Date: February 6, 2009 |   |   | By: /s/ Gary L. Martin                              |   |   |
|------------------------|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|                        |   |   | Gary L. Martin, Chairman of the Board and President |   |   |
**EXHIBIT 99.1**

 

**Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350,**

**as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection with the filingof the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2002(the “Report”) by Cascade Natural Gas Corporation (the “Company”), each of theundersigned hereby certifies that:

 

1.                                       TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2.                                       Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   | /s/ W. Brian  Matsuyama                         |   |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | W. Brian  Matsuyama                             |
|   | President  and Chief Executive Officer          |
|   |                                            |
|   |                                            |
|   | /s/ J.D.  Wessling                              |   |
|   | J.D.  Wessling                                  |
|   | Senior Vice  President – Finance and Chief |
|   | Financial  Officer                              |

 

 

----
232.503-6 Suspension or reduction of payments. ( b ) *Contractor noncompliance.* See also 242.7503.
( g ) *Loss contracts.* Use the following loss ratio adjustment procedures for making adjustments required by FAR 32.503-6(f) and (g)— ( i ) Except as provided in paragraph (g)(ii) of this subsection, the contracting officer must prepare a supplementary analysis of the contractor's request for progress payments and calculate the loss ratio adjustment using the procedures in FAR 32.503-6(g).
( ii ) The contracting officer may request the contractor to prepare the supplementary analysis as an attachment to the progress payment request when the contracting officer determines that the contractor's methods of estimating the “Costs to Complete” are reliable, accurate, and not susceptible to improper influences.
( iii ) To maintain an audit trail and permit verification of calculations, do not make the loss ratio adjustments by altering or replacing data on the contractor's original request for progress payment (SF 1443, Contractor's Request for Progress Payment, or computer generated equivalent).
[56 FR 36409, July 31, 1991, as amended at 60 FR 29499, June 5, 1995; 65 FR 39722, June 27, 2000]
| **Date**   | **Author (From)**   | **Recipient (To)**            | **Organization**                          | **Subject**                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     |
|------------|---------------------|-------------------------------|-------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|            |
| 2021/01/13 | Reed  D. Rubinstein | Honorable  Gail Heriot et al. | United  States Commission on Civil Rights | Northwestern University Law School  PDF (318.67K) **ARCHIVED AND NOT FOR RELIANCE**2020/10/16Kimberly M. RicheyGene DodaroGovernment AccountabilityOfficeReply to GAO Report on Restraint And Seclusion Data PDF (311K)2020/03/23Kenneth L. MarcusJacqueline NowickiGovernment Accountability OfficeReply to GAO Report on Restraint and Seclusion Data PDF (338K)2019/12/18Kenneth L. MarcusGene DodaroGovernment Accountability OfficeReply to GAO Study on Restraint and Seclusion PDF (2.6M)2019/10/04Kenneth L. MarcusCatherine LhamonU.S. Commission on  Civil RightsSexual Harassment and  Free Speech on Campus PDF (634K)
 
  Last Modified: 04/20/2021 |
##### 



Page 23

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

I, John P. Derham Cato, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of The
Cato Corporation, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, U.S.C. Section 1350, that on the date of this Certification:



|1. |  | the Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended July 31, 2004 fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  
|2. |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.                       

Date: September 2, 2004/s/ John P. Derham CatoJohn P. Derham CatoChairman, President andChief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 27 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 27

Disapproving the rule submitted by the Department of Labor relating to 
    ``Clarification of Employer's Continuing Obligation to Make and 
  Maintain an Accurate Record of Each Recordable Injury and Illness''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 2, 2017

   Mr. Cassidy (for himself, Mr. Hatch, Mr. Isakson, and Mr. Daines) 
  introduced the following joint resolution; which was read twice and 
  referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
Disapproving the rule submitted by the Department of Labor relating to 
    ``Clarification of Employer's Continuing Obligation to Make and 
  Maintain an Accurate Record of Each Recordable Injury and Illness''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Department of Labor relating to ``Clarification 
of Employer's Continuing Obligation to Make and Maintain an Accurate 
Record of Each Recordable Injury and Illness'' (published at 81 Fed. 
Reg. 91792 (December 19, 2016)), and such rule shall have no force or 
effect.
                                 <all>
```