alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 32.1****CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT**I, John P. D. Cato, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of The Cato Corporation (the“Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section1350, that on the date of this Certification:1. the Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended July 29, 2006 (the “Report”) fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.Dated: September 5, 2006     /s/ John P. D. Cato     John P. D. Cato  Chairman, President and  Chief Executive Officer
25
Exhibit 31.1
 
      a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b)
    
    [Intentionally omitted];c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andd)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 June 11, 2008
    /s/ Eugene S. KahnEugene S. KahnChief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                       9
<MULTIPLIER>                    1000
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                    DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<CASH>                                  39,644
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                       0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                        35,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                             0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>            385,767
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                  83,998
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                    84,013
<LOANS>                              1,005,021
<ALLOWANCE>                             (9,010)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                       1,594,763
<DEPOSITS>                             953,924
<SHORT-TERM>                           288,544
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                    109,997
<LONG-TERM>                             74,862
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        0
<PREFERRED>                                  0
<COMMON>                                28,416
<OTHER-SE>                             139,020
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>       1,594,763
<INTEREST-LOAN>                         86,503
<INTEREST-INVEST>                       18,437
<INTEREST-OTHER>                         6,315
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                       111,255
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                      34,478
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      51,563
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                   59,692
<LOAN-LOSSES>                              972
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                          40
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                         49,715
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         28,794
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>              28,794
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              0
<CHANGES>                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                            20,213
<EPS-PRIMARY>                             1.98
<EPS-DILUTED>                             1.94
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                            4.52
<LOANS-NON>                              1,416
<LOANS-PAST>                             3,050
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                             0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                          3,773
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                         9,209
<CHARGE-OFFS>                            1,355
<RECOVERIES>                               184
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                        9,010
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                     9,010
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                          0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                      0

</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.2



Canada Southern Petroleum Ltd.



Certification of Chief Financial Officer



I, Randy L. Denecky, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Canada Southern Petroleum Ltd. (the registrant);



2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b)

(Intentionally omitted pursuant to the guidance contained in SEC Release No. 33  8238)



(c)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(d)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.



Date: November 8, 2004



by /s/ Randy L. Denecky

Randy L. Denecky

Chief Financial Officer
Re: FAA request for more information from Gulfstream, relative to 

their petition for exemption from 14 CFR Part 25.981(a)(3) as amended 

by Amendment 25-102, for the Model G280 Airplane 

In August 2011, the FAA sent to and discussed with Gulfstream the following comments, 

which required a re-petition from Gulfstream. 

Gulfstream petition states: 

GALP has considered installing lightning protective caps on top of the sealant as an 

additional protective feature; however this was ruled out as it was not considered as an 

“independent feature” for providing fault tolerance. 

FAA comment: 

Other applicants have defined structural cracking as well as the fastener failure as single 

failures for which they are requesting an exemption. GALP should assure that all single 

failures are defined and the impracticality of addressing them are included in their 

request. In addition, GALP should provide a discussion of the types of design changes 

that were considered (similar to the additional sealant noted above) and why the design 

modifications were impractical. A fairly detailed practicality analysis should be provided. 

GALP should carefully read the policy memo and provide information such as how 

manufacturing quality and maintenance are controlled to assure the frequency of 

occurrence of development of ignition sources is controlled to meet the probability 

requirements in the policy. 

Gulfstream petition states: 

Since the G250 is designed to carry less that 30 passengers and a payload less than 7500 

pounds, the applicable flammability requirements of §25.981 are as amended by 

Amendment 25-102. 

FAA comment: 

This is not the correct criteria for a new type design- size and payload are not a 

consideration- amendment 102 is the correct level.
June 11, 1975.

C. A. No. 74-142.

#### State *v.*Philip A. Pailin.

*Julius C. Michaelson,*Attorney General, *John Austin Murphy,*Special *961Asst. Attorney General, for plaintiff. *William F. Reilly,*Public Defender, *Bruce G. Pollock,*Asst. Public Defender, for defendant.

*960Sometime after the approval but before the publication of the opinion in this case, the defendant filed a motion for his release or a remand of the case to the Superior Court. His motion is based on a claim of newly discovered evidence. The motion contains allegations that should be resolved in the Superior Court. Accordingly, the defendant’s motion is denied pro forma and he is free to pursue this matter in the Superior Court.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Equinor Energy LP v. Lindale Pipeline, LLC

Appellate case number: 01-21-00712-CV

Trial court case number: 2019-44547

Trial court: 157th District Court of Harris County

On July 8, 2022, appellant filed a motion to clarify the briefing schedule because the 

reporter’s record was incomplete. Appellant stated that it had requested all exhibits offered or 

admitted at trial, and that, after four extensions requested by the court reporter, the reporter’s record 

that was filed did not include well over 100 exhibits that were offered or admitted at trial. 

Accordingly, this Court issued an order on July 12, 2022, directing the court reporter to file the 

missing volumes containing the more than 100 exhibits offered or admitted at trial. We ordered 

this supplemental reporter’s record to be filed by July 26, 2022.

On July 26, 2022, the court reporter filed a request for an extension until August 8, 2022 

to file the supplemental reporter’s record volumes, stating that she was “waiting on an agreement 

from Plaintiffs and Defendants as to a list of exhibits that they would like to include as a 

supplement to the Reporter’s Record.” Rule 34.6(d) permits the appellate court to order the court 

reporter to file supplemental volumes of the reporter’s record containing omitted items. See TEX.

R. APP. P. 34.6(d). Appellant has not advised this Court that it requested only items that the parties 

agreed upon. Instead, appellant requested all exhibits offered or omitted at trial.

Accordingly, the Court grants the extension request but orders the court reporter to 

comply with the July 12, 2022 order and file volumes containing all exhibits offered or admitted 

at trial by August 8, 2022.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: ______/s/ Peter Kelly________

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: ___August 4, 2022___
Exhibit 31.1
 Certification
 Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes  Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Emerson Radio Corp.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)), and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and
the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
   Date: February 11, 2010
    /s/  Adrian MaAdrian MaChief Executive Officer  22
Protecting Students

**Overview**	The Office for Civil Rights  (OCR) enforces the Age Discrimination Act of 1975,  which prohibits discrimination based on age in programs or  activities that receive federal financial assistance, in schools and colleges that  receive federal funds from the U.S. Department of Education.  The Age Discrimination Act of 1975 does not cover employment discrimination. Complaints of employment discrimination based on age may be filed with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act.     The regulations under the Age Discrimination Act,  allow you to file a claim in Federal court under that law only after (1) 180 days have passed since you file your complaint with OCR and OCR has made no finding, or (2) OCR issues a finding in favor of the recipient. In the latter case, OCR will promptly notify you and  remind you of your right to file in court.

----

 

              - Laws
              - Case Resolutions
              - Frequently Asked Questions on Age Discrimination
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-02-1999
<CASH>                                              99
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   77,598
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,260
<INVENTORY>                                    104,539
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               210,815
<PP&E>                                         407,467
<DEPRECIATION>                                 247,869
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 413,407
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           92,667
<BONDS>                                         17,905
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        22,510
<OTHER-SE>                                     199,390
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   413,407
<SALES>                                        113,168
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               113,168
<CGS>                                           89,069
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  108,389
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   290
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   158
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 937
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,394
<INCOME-TAX>                                       908
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,486
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,486
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.15
        

</TABLE>
LAWTON CALVIN ADKINS

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 13

- 4391

___ __________________________/

Opinion filed July 7, 2014.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Suwannee County

. Julian E. Collins , Judge

.

Lawton Calvin Adkins, pro se , Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Samuel A. Perrone, Assistant Attorne y

General, Tallahaassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROBERTS

, RAY, and SWANSON

, J J

. , CONCUR.
| Exhibit      21(a)                      |   |                          |
|-----------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------|
| PPL      Corporation                    |   |                          |
| Subsidiaries      of the Registrant     |   |                          |
| As      of December 31, 2007            |   |                          |
|                                    |   |                          |
|                                    |   |                          |
| Company      Name                       |   | State      or Jurisdiction of |
| Business      Conducted under Same Name |   | Incorporation/Formation       |
|                                    |   |                          |
| PPL      Electric Utilities Corporation |   | Pennsylvania                  |
|                                    |   |                          |
| PPL      Energy Funding Corporation     |   | Pennsylvania                  |
|                                    |   |                          |
| PPL      Energy Supply, LLC             |   | Delaware                      |
|                                    |   |                          |
| PPL      Investment Corporation         |   | Delaware                      |
|                                    |   |                          |
| PPL      Global, LLC                    |   | Delaware                      |
|                                    |   |                          |
| PMDC      International Holdings, Inc.  |   | Delaware                      |
|                                    |   |                          |
| PPL      EnergyPlus, LLC                |   | Pennsylvania                  |
|                                    |   |                          |
| PPL      Generation, LLC                |   | Delaware                      |
|                                    |   |                          |
| PPL      Susquehanna, LLC               |   | Delaware                      |
|                                    |   |                          |
| WPD      Holdings Ltd.                  |   | United      Kingdom           |
Thank you for visiting the Office of Finance and Operations (OFO). We will continually improve our pages and add new resources for your use and assistance. We appreciate and welcome your input.

Office of Finance and OperationsJim Clemmens400 Maryland Ave., SWRoom 214-32 LBJWashington, DC 20202

## OFO Leadership Team

Denise L. Carter Delegated the Duties of the Assistant Secretary, OFO

Richard J. LucasPrincipal Deputy Assistant Secretary, OFO

Timothy Barkley Chief of Staff

Ayesha Edwards-Kemp Executive Officer, OFO

Calvin Mitchell Director, Office of Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization

Michael Chew Director, Office of Equal Employment Opportunity Services

Rodger A. Drew, Jr. Director, Office Hearings and Appeals

Gary Wood Deputy Assistant Secretary, Office of Financial Management

Kerry Neal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Office of Acquisitions, Grants, and Risk Management

Jacqueline Clay Deputy Assistant Secretary, Office of Human Resources

Jim Hairfield Deputy Assistant Secretary, Office of Security, Facilities and Logistics Services

Andrew Sanzenbacher Deputy Assistant Secretary, Office of Business Support Services

Victor Shirley Deputy Assistant Secretary, Management and Planning

  Last Modified: 04/06/2023
U.S. Dept Commerce/NOAA/NMFS/NWFSC/Publications NOAA-NWFSC Tech Memo 12: Exposure to oil from the Exxon Valdez Figure 18. Isomer pattern graphs with peak areas normalized to the peak area of one of the C2-phenanthrene isomers(*) for weathered and unweathered Prudhoe Bay crude oil. Abbreviations are in Table 1, except for biphenyl (BPH), anthracene (ANT), and benzo[e]pyrene (BEP). Figure 19. Isomer pattern graphs with peak areas normalized to the peak area of one of the C2-phenanthrene isomers(*) for fresh Kuwaiti crude oil, fresh Cook Inlet crude oil, and 15-month weathered Prudhoe Bay crude oil from Snug Harbor. Abbreviations are in Table 1, except for biphenyl (BPH), anthracene (ANT), and benzo[e]pyrene (BEP). Figure 20. Isomer pattern graphs with peak areas normalized to the peak area of one of the C2-phenanthrene isomers(*) for #2 fuel oil and Bunker C oil. Abbreviations are in Table 1, except for biphenyl (BPH), anthracene (ANT), and benzo[e]pyrene (BEP). Figure 21. Isomer pattern graphs with peak areas normalized to the peak area of one of the C2-phenanthrene isomers(*) for creosote and Duwamish III sediment extract. Abbreviations are in Table 1, except for biphenyl (BPH), anthracene (ANT), and benzo[e]pyrene (BEP).
#### 225.7704-1 Applicability of trade agreements.

As authorized by the United States Trade Representative, the Secretary of Defense has waived the prohibition in section 302(a) of the Trade Agreements Act (see subpart 225.4) for acquisitions by DoD, and by GSA on behalf of DoD, of products and services from SC/CASA states in direct support of operations in Afghanistan.

[75 FR 81918, Dec. 29, 2010]
Exhibit 99.1





Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350


(Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002)





The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company





In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, Matthew K. Rose, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Thomas N.
Hund, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated: August 9, 2002








/s/    MATTHEW K.
ROSE

/s/    THOMAS N.
HUNDMatthew K. Rose

Thomas N. HundChairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer




E-3