alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
BEFOO 'l'BE 


DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTAT~ON 

WASHXNGTOm, D.C. 


Joint Application of: 

AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC. 

BRITISH AIRWAYS PLC 

FINNAIR OYJ 

IBERIA LINEAS AEREAS DE ESPANA, S.A. DOT-OST-2008-0252 

ROYAL JORDANIAN AIRLINES 

under 49 U.S.C. §§ 41308 and 41309 for 


approval of and antitrust immunity for 


alliance agreements 


CONFIDENTIALITY AFFIDAVIT FOR AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC. 

STATE OF TEXAS 

County of Tarrant 

J. OTTO GRUNOW, being first duly sworn, deposes and says: 

1. 	 I am an attorney for American Airlines, Inc. 

2. 	 I promise to use the confidential information filed in this 

proceeding only for the purpose of participating in this 

proceeding, and will disclose such information only to other 

American Airlines, Inc. 

4333 Amon Carter Boulevard 

Maildrop 5675 HDQ 

Fort Worth, Texas 76155 

otto.grunow@aa.com 

Subscribed and sworn to before me 


this day of Feb~ 

Print 

~~~ name: .&e.f (~da.J -?,,,;-'''ter 


NOTARY PUBLIC 


persons who have fi d lid affidavits in this docket. 

J. 0 

Counsel 
I hereby certify that I have this day served the 

document by email on the fol persons: 

sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com 

scott.mcclain@delta.com 

sametta.c.barnett@delta.com 

lsburywinthrop.com 

bkeiner@crowell.com 

mrosia@crowell.com 

bruce.rabinovitz@wilmerhale.com 

j .manley@un~ted.com 

bob.kneis . com 

robert.land@jetblue.com 

msinick@ssd.com 

cdonley@ssd.com 

anbird@fedex.com 

dvaughan@kelleydrye.com 

kevin.montgomery@polaraircargo.com 

jrichardson@johnlrichardson.com 

lhalloway@crowell.com 

.com 

mroller@rollerbauer.com 

howard.kass@usairways.com 

benjamin. .com 

sophy.chen@hklaw.com 

jhill@dlalaw.com 

bill@mietuslaw.com 

mgoldman@sgbdc.com 

rsilverberg@sgbdc.com 

dhainbach@ggh-airlaw.com 

mcmillin@woa.com 

mchopra@jamhoff.com 

russell.bailey@alpa.org 

dkirstein@yklaw.com 

jyoung@yklaw.com 

donna.kooperstein@usdoj.gov 

dwight.moore@ustranscom.mil 

jim.ballough@faa.gov 

r@state.gov 

recohn@hhlaw.com 

zsrlaw.com 

pmurphy@lopmurphy.com 

lachter@starpower.net 

anita.mosner@hklaw.com 

atlasair.com 

crowell.com 

CARL B. NELSON, JR 

February 15, 2010
Case: 1:12-cv-03965 Document #: 21-4 Filed: 04/24/13 Page 1 of 4 PageID #:95
Case: 1:12-cv-03965 Document #: 21-4 Filed: 04/24/13 Page 2 of 4 PageID #:96
Case: 1:12-cv-03965 Document #: 21-4 Filed: 04/24/13 Page 3 of 4 PageID #:97
Case: 1:12-cv-03965 Document #: 21-4 Filed: 04/24/13 Page 4 of 4 PageID #:98
1 

### Njo, Heather

From: Schaeffer, John Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2014 2:54 PM To: robert.mott@sunchemical.com Cc: Lewis, Paul; Njo, Heather Subject: 127-68-4 HPV 3 Instructions for sending an exemptio n request with example submission Attachments: 98-56-6 Letter of Exemption Sec 4 98-56-6_10162013 (3).pdf

Robert,

As we discussed, here are the instructions for Sun Chemical to submit their request for an exemption f rom testing for Benzenesulfonic acid, 3-nitro-, sodium salt (1:1) ( CASRN 127-68-4):

Applying for an Exemption EPA’ s Procedures Governing Testing Consent Agreements a nd Test Rules (40 CFR part 790), provide for exempt ions from test rules (40 CFR part 790, subpart E) only on the basis of data adequacy (i.e., data fulfilling the required testing endpoints is, or will become available, through tes ting under the test rule by another test sponsor). 40 CFR § 790.87. Conditional exemptions are granted to a company tha t agrees to pay fair and equitable reimbursement to the company upon whose data the granting of my application is b ased. See, 40 CFR § 790.99. Your request, however, is not based on data availability and no other company has agreed t o conduct the testing. An exemption, therefore, is not warranted.

An exemption request must contain the following inf ormation (see 40 CFR 790.82)

a) The identity of the test rule, the chemical iden tity, and the CAS No. of the test substance on whic h the application is based. (b) The specific testing requirement(s) from which an exemption is sought and the basis for the exempt ion request. (c) Name, address, and telephone number of applican t. (d) Name, address, and telephone number of appropri ate individual to contact for further information. (e)(1) If required in the test rule to establish eq uivalence: (i) The chemical identity of the test substance on which the application is based. (ii) Equivalence data specified in § 790.85. (2) If a test rule requires testing of a single rep resentative substance, EPA will consider all forms of the chemical subject to that rule to be equivalent and will not require the submission of equivalence data as described in § 790.85.

The exemption request must also contain the stateme nt of agreement of reimbursement (40 CFR 790.99)

(For your convenience, I have attached an example l etter)

The addresses are as follows (regular mail is fine; but you can also “hand deliver” via Fed Ex etc.) :

• Mail: Document Control Office (DCO) (7407M), Office of P ollution Prevention and Toxics (OPPT), U. S. Enviro nmental

Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Was hington, DC 20460-0001, ATTN: 40 CFR 799.5089; Dock et

Number EPA–HQ–OPPT–2009

– 0112, or:2

• Hand delivery : OPPT Document Control Office (DCO), EPA East Buil ding Room E6428 (202-564-8930), U.S.

Environmental Protection Agency, 1201 Constitution Ave., NW, Washington, D.C. 20004, Attention: 40 CFR 799.5089;

Docket ID Number EPA–HQ–OPPT–2009

– 0112.

Please also send me a pdf copy.

Thank you,

John

John Schaeffer Senior Biologist USEPA/OPPT/CCD/CITB 1201 Constitution Ave, NW Washington, DC 20460 Mail Code: 7405M Phone: 202-564-8173
MEMORANDUM

TO: Portland Cement Rulemaking Docket S UBJECT : Meeting wi th Portland Cement Association and Cement Industry Representatives to discuss their concerns on the Final Portland Cement NESHAP and NSPS LOCATION : US Environmental Protection Agency , 1220 Pennsylvania Avenue, Washington

DC 20460 D ATE OF MEETING : January 6, 2011 Participants: Andy O’Hare and various industry representatives. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Gina McCarth y Peter Tsirigotis Steve Silverman
The Portlan d Cement Association (PCA) met with EPA to further discuss issues from the December 2010 meeting. Their presentation is attached.
#### 1852.232-79 Payment for on-site preparatory costs.

As prescribed in 1832.111-70, insert the following clause:

# Payment for On-Site Preparatory Costs (SEP 1987)

Costs associated with on-site preparatory work (start-up or set-up costs) will be prorated over all work activities of a Critical Path Method (CPM) network or Progress Chart against which progress payments will be sought. Separate payment for on-site preparatory costs will not be made by the Government.

(End of clause)
22.201 General. ( a ) Executive Order 11755, December 29, 1973, as amended by Executive Order 12608, September 9, 1987, and Executive Order 12943, December 13, 1994, states: “The development of the occupational and educational skills of prison inmates is essential to their rehabilitation and to their ability to make an effective return to free society. Meaningful employment serves to develop those skills. It is also true, however, that care must be exercised to avoid either the exploitation of convict labor or any unfair competition between convict labor and free labor in the production of goods and services.” The Executive order does not prohibit the contractor, in performing the contract, from employing— ( 1 ) Persons on parole or probation;
( 2 ) Persons who have been pardoned or who have served their terms;
( 3 ) Federal prisoners; or
( 4 ) Nonfederal prisoners authorized to work at paid employment in the community under the laws of a jurisdiction listed in the Executive order if— ( i ) The worker is paid or is in an approved work training program on a voluntary basis;
( ii ) Representatives of local union central bodies or similar labor union organizations have been consulted;
( iii ) Paid employment will not— ( A ) Result in the displacement of employed workers;
( B ) Be applied in skills, crafts, or trades in which there is a surplus of available gainful labor in the locality; or
( C ) Impair existing contracts for services;
( iv ) The rates of pay and other conditions of employment will not be less than those for work of a similar nature in the locality where the work is being performed; and
( v ) The Attorney General of the United States has certified that the work-release laws or regulations of the jurisdiction involved are in conformity with the requirements of Executive Order 11755, as amended.
( b ) Department of Justice regulations authorize the Director of the Bureau of Justice Assistance to exercise the power and authority vested in the Attorney General by the Executive order to certify and to revoke the certification of work-release laws or regulations (see 28 CFR 0.94-1(b)).
[61 FR 31644, June 20, 1996]
Exhibit 32(e)








CERTIFICATION FURNISHED PURSUANT TO




18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,




AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Florida Power Corporation (the “Company”) for the period ended March 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Vincent M. Dolan, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)           the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)           the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.











U/s/ Vincent M. Dolan


Vincent M. Dolan


President and Chief Executive Officer


May 8, 2012








This certification is being furnished and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
#### 19.811 Preparing the contracts.
(April 13, 1962)

#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. William Wheeler, Appellant, v. W. Cecil Johnston, as Director of Dannemora State Hospital, Respondent.

Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Present — Bergan, P. J., Coon, Gibson, Reynolds and Taylor, JJ.
The *Act to Promote the Education of the Blind* authorizes an annual appropriation for the American Printing House for the Blind (APH) to produce and distribute educational materials adapted for students who are legally blind and enrolled in formal educational programs below the college level. Materials produced by APH include textbooks in Braille and large type, educational tools such as braille typewriters and microcomputer software and hardware, teaching aides such as tests, performance measures and other special supplies. The materials are distributed to programs serving individuals who are blind through allotments to the states. The allotments are based on an annual census conducted by APH of the number of students who are legally blind in each state and are provided in the form of credits. State educational agencies and programs serving persons who are blind may order materials free-of-charge up to the amount of funds allocated to each state for educational materials. Approximately 85 percent of the appropriation is used to cover the cost of operations to produce these materials. 

The Printing House also uses a portion of these funds to conduct research related to developing and improving products and to provide advisory services to consumer organizations on the availability and use of materials produced by APH.

### Links: 

**American Printing House for the Blind's Program Site**

**American Printing House for the Blind's Website**

 Top

----

### OSERS Navigation

About OSERS | People and Offices | Programs and ProjectsGrants and Funding | Legislation and Policy | Publications, Products, Research and StatisticsAdditional Resources | Contact and Feedback
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

SHARON ALICIA BURKE ANZALDI, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) No. 12 C 2987

)

RACHEL MARIE CANNON, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

1

MEMORANDUM ORDER

Unsuccessful in her effort to wreak vengeance against judicial officers and the prosecutor

who are involved in the federal criminal case against her -- an effort that is clearly in retaliation

for their performance of their assigned roles in her prosecution on those criminal charges --

Sharon Alicia Burke Anzaldi ("Anzaldi") has now turned (perhaps predictably) to launching

ad hominem attacks against this Court for doing its job in addressing her groundless Complaint

filed against those federal targets. Because Anzaldi's September 7 filing has permitted more than

Fed. R. Civ. P. ("Rule") 59(e)'s nonextendable 28 day time limit to elapse following this Court's

August 7, 2012 dismissal of her action, that Rule is unavailable to her -- and she has shown no

basis for relief under Rule 60(b).

This Court will not retaliate in kind against the base canards contained in Anzaldi's

current "Motion To Void Judgment/Memorandum For Violations of Civil Rights, Due Process of

Law and Malicious Conduct Unbecoming a Federal Judge," even by cataloging the outright

 This is the correct case caption, although the current motion lists the "United States of 1

America" as defendant. That may be a Freudian slip, because the underlying Complaint and

many of plaintiff's filings read as though she is indeed at war with the United States.

Case: 1:12-cv-02987 Document #: 34 Filed: 09/12/12 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:316
falsehoods included in her statement. Instead, because the bulk of Anzaldi's current filing 2

reconfirms the bizarre world in which she seems to function, and because this Court's dismissal

order was entirely appropriate, her current motion is denied.

__________________________________________

Milton I. Shadur

Senior United States District Judge

Date: September 12, 2012

 Objective evidence, such as the transcripts of in-court proceedings, would put the lie 2

to the various distorted versions offered up by Anzaldi. And as another example of revisionist

history, it is flat-out false for Anzaldi to say in Motion ¶ 4 that this Court "stack[ed] the court

room with 7-8 enforcement personnel" -- where she got that idea is a total mystery.

- 2 -

Case: 1:12-cv-02987 Document #: 34 Filed: 09/12/12 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:317
#### 226.7100 Scope of subpart.

This subpart implements section 2912 of the Fiscal Year 1994 Defense Authorization Act (Pub. L. 103-160) and section 817 of the Fiscal Year 1995 Defense Authorization Act (Pub. L. 103-337).

[60 FR 5870, Jan. 31, 1995]
U.S. DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

ATTORNEY APPEARANCE FORM

NOTE: In order to appear before this Court an attorney must either be a member in good

standing of this Court’s general bar or be granted leave to appear pro hac vice as provided for

by Local Rules 83.12 through 83.14.

In the Matter of Case Number:

AN APPEARANCE IS HEREBY FILED BY THE UNDERSIGNED AS ATTORNEY FOR:

NAME (Type or print)

SIGNATURE (Use electronic signature if the appearance form is filed electronically)

 s/

FIRM

STREET ADDRESS

CITY/STATE/ZIP

ID NUMBER (SEE ITEM 3 IN INSTRUCTIONS) TELEPHONE NUMBER

ARE YOU ACTING AS LEAD COUNSEL IN THIS CASE? YES NO 

ARE YOU ACTING AS LOCAL COUNSEL IN THIS CASE? YES NO 

ARE YOU A MEMBER OF THIS COURT’S TRIAL BAR? YES NO 

IF THIS CASE REACHES TRIAL, WILL YOU ACT AS THE TRIAL ATTORNEY? YES NO 

IF THIS IS A CRIMINAL CASE, CHECK THE BOX BELOW THAT DESCRIBES YOUR STATUS.

RETAINED COUNSEL APPOINTED COUNSEL 

Case: 1:12-cv-04056 Document #: 2 Filed: 05/24/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:15
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 52 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. J. RES. 52

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Federal Communications 
         Commission relating to ``Restoring Internet Freedom''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 27, 2018

  Mr. Markey (for himself, Mr. Schumer, Mr. Wyden, Ms. Cantwell, Mr. 
 Schatz, Mr. Blumenthal, Mr. Whitehouse, Mr. Merkley, Mrs. Gillibrand, 
 Ms. Baldwin, Mr. Heinrich, Ms. Hassan, Ms. Klobuchar, Mr. Peters, Ms. 
 Stabenow, Mr. Leahy, Mr. Sanders, Mr. Brown, Mr. Reed, Mr. Kaine, Ms. 
   Warren, Mr. Durbin, Mr. Bennet, Mrs. Shaheen, Mr. Van Hollen, Mr. 
  Cardin, Ms. Hirono, Ms. Duckworth, Ms. Harris, Mrs. McCaskill, Mr. 
  Udall, Mr. Booker, Mr. Casey, Ms. Cortez Masto, Mr. Menendez, Mrs. 
 Murray, Ms. Smith, Mr. Tester, Mr. King, Mr. Nelson, Mr. Murphy, Mrs. 
    Feinstein, Mr. Warner, Mr. Donnelly, Mr. Carper, Mr. Coons, Ms. 
 Heitkamp, Mr. Manchin, and Mr. Jones) introduced the following joint 
   resolution; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                 Commerce, Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Federal Communications 
         Commission relating to ``Restoring Internet Freedom''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Federal Communications Commission relating to 
``Restoring Internet Freedom'' (83 Fed. Reg. 7852 (February 22, 2018)), 
and such rule shall have no force or effect.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION  (pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 of Boeing Capital Corporation (the
"Company") as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission") on the date hereof (the "Report") and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Walter E. Skowronski, President and Director of the Company, certify that:



|              |  |                                                                   
|------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------
|March 4, 2004 |  | /s/WALTER E. SKOWRONSKIWalter E. Skowronski President and
Director

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Boeing Capital Corporation and will be retained by Boeing Capital Corporation and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

86

---

QuickLinks
Exhibit 10.10


                             Stock Option Agreement


Number of Shares:  500,000                          Date of Grant:  May 26, 1999




This Stock Option Agreement is made this 26th day of May, 1999 by and between
Gary B. Mendenhall (the "Optionee") and MedGrup Corporation, a Colorado
corporation (the "Company").

     1.   Grant of Option. The Company, pursuant to the provisions of the
          Company's Incentive Stock Option Plan (`Plan"), attached hereto,
          hereby grants to the Optionee, subject to the terms and conditions set
          forth or incorporated herein, an Option to purchase from the Company
          all or any part of an aggregate of 500,000 Common Shares, all at the
          purchase price of $1.31 per Share. All of the terms and provisions of
          the Plan are incorporated herein by reference.

          In the event of any conflict between this Agreement and the Plan, the
          Plan shall control.

     2.   Exercise. This Option shall be exercisable in whole or in part (in
          multiples of 1,000 Shares, unless for the balance of this Option).
          This Option shall expire on the seventh anniversary of the Date of
          Grant stated above.

          This Option vests at the rate of 250,000 Common Shares as of Date of
          Grant; 60,000 Common Shares when the Company's public stock price is
          $2.00 or more; 60,000 Common Shares when the Company's public stock
          price is $3.00 or more; 60,000 Common Shares when the Company's public
          stock price is $4.00 or more; and 70,000 Common Shares when the
          Company's public stock price is $5.00 or more. The "Company's public
          stock price" means the closing sales price must be at or more than the
          required price level for each of the trading days in the preceding 30
          calendar days.

          This Option shall be exercisable by delivery to the Company of a copy
          of this Stock Option Agreement and manually signed notice of election
          to exercise, in the form attached hereto, specifying the number of
          Shares to be purchase. Payment of the purchase price shall be as
          stated in the Plan or allowed by the Board of Directors.


                           MedGrup Corporation




                           William D. Cronin
                           CEO
232.404 Exclusions. ( a ) ( 9 ) The requirements of FAR subpart 32.4 do not apply to advertisements in high school and college publications for military recruitment efforts under 10 U.S.C. 503 when the contract cost does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold.
[56 FR 36409, July 31, 1991, as amended at 70 FR 75413, Dec. 20, 2005; 71 FR 75892, Dec. 19, 2006; 75 FR 45074, Aug. 2, 2010]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000016160
<NAME> CAL-MAINE FOODS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-29-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-27-1999
<CASH>                                          54,825
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   14,210
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     36,625
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               106,268
<PP&E>                                         169,653
<DEPRECIATION>                                  73,725
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 210,887
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           41,725
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           188
<OTHER-SE>                                      83,973
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   210,887
<SALES>                                        224,594
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               224,594
<CGS>                                          185,519
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  185,519
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,426
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,848
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,702
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,146
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,146
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .47
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .46
        

</TABLE>