Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 121 / Thursday, June 23, 2016 / Proposed Rules 40825 

(h) Modification of Wing Trailing Edge 

Within 1,000 flight cycles or 12 months, 

whichever occurs first after the effective date 

of this AD, modify the wing trailing edge 

lower skin panels into access panels, in 

accordance with Part 1 of the 

Accomplishment Instructions of Fokker 

Service Bulletin SBF100–57–049, dated 

March 24, 2015. 

(i) Inspection of the Wing Rear Spar Lower 

Girder From WSTA 2635 to 8700 and WSTA 

11794 to 12975 

Within 2,000 flight cycles or 24 months, 

whichever occurs first after the effective date 

of this AD, accomplish a one-time detailed 

visual inspection for corrosion of the wing 

rear spar lower girder area from WSTA 2635 

to 8700 and WSTA 11794 to 12975, in 

accordance with Part 2 of the 

Accomplishment Instructions of Fokker 

Service Bulletin SBF100–57–049, dated 

March 24, 2015. 

(j) Modification of Wing Rear Spar Lower 

Girder 

(1) If during any inspection required by 

paragraph (g) or (i) of this AD, as applicable, 

corrosion is found, before further flight, 

remove the corrosion and determine the 

remaining thickness at the damaged spots, in 

accordance with the Accomplishment 

Instructions of Fokker Service Bulletin 

SBF100–57–049, dated March 24, 2015. If the 

remaining thickness at the damaged spots, as 

determined by this paragraph, is not within 

the tolerances specified in Fokker Service 

Bulletin SBF100–57–049, dated March 24, 

2015, except as required by paragraph (k)(1) 

of this AD: Before further flight, accomplish 

the applicable corrective actions as defined 

in paragraph (j)(1)(i) or (j)(1)(ii) of this AD, 

as applicable. 

(i) For corrosion damage found outboard of 

WSTA 8200 only: Repair in accordance with 

the Accomplishment Instructions of Fokker 

Service Bulletin SBF100–57–050, Revision 1, 

dated May 19, 2015. 

(ii) Repair using a method approved by the 

Manager, International Branch, ANM–116, 

Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA; or the 

European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA); or 

Fokker Services B.V.’s EASA Design 

Organization Approval (DOA). 

(2) If during any inspection required by 

paragraph (g) or (i) of this AD, only damage 

to the surface protection is found, or if the 

remaining thickness at the damaged spots, as 

determined by paragraph (j)(1) of this AD, is 

within the tolerances specified in Fokker 

Service Bulletin SBF100–57–049, dated 

March 24, 2015, except as required by 

paragraph (k)(1) of this AD: Before further 

flight, restore the surface protection in 

accordance with the Accomplishment 

Instructions of Fokker Service Bulletin 

SBF100–57–049, dated March 24, 2015, 

except as required by paragraph (k)(2) of this 

AD. 

(k) Exceptions to Service Information 

Specifications 

(1) Where Fokker Service Bulletin SBF100– 

57–049, dated March 24, 2015, specifies the 

acceptability of smaller thickness or 

customized repairs: Before further flight, 

obtain acceptable tolerances, using a method 

approved by the Manager, International 

Branch, ANM–116, Transport Airplane 

Directorate, FAA; or EASA; or Fokker 

Services B.V.’s EASA DOA. 

(2) Where Fokker Service Bulletin SBF100– 

57–049, dated March 24, 2015, specifies 

contacting Fokker for a customized repair: 

Before further flight, repair using a method 

approved by the Manager, International 

Branch, ANM–116, Transport Airplane 

Directorate, FAA; or EASA; or Fokker 

Services B.V.’s EASA DOA. 

(l) Reporting Requirements 

Submit a report of the findings both 

positive and negative of the inspection 

required by paragraph (g) and (i) of this AD 

to Fokker Services, in accordance with the 

Accomplishment Instructions of Fokker 

Service Bulletin SBF100–57–049, dated 

March 24, 2015, at the time specified in 

paragraph (l)(1) or (l)(2) of this AD. 

(1) If the inspection was done on or after 

the effective date of this AD: Submit the 

report within 30 days after the inspection. 

(2) If the inspection was done before the 

effective date of this AD: Submit the report 

within 30 days after the effective date of this 

AD. 

(m) Other FAA AD Provisions 

The following provisions also apply to this 

AD: 

(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance 

(AMOCs): The Manager, International 

Branch, ANM–116, FAA, has the authority to 

approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested 

using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. 

In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your 

request to your principal inspector or local 

Flight Standards District Office, as 

appropriate. If sending information directly 

to the International Branch, send it to ATTN: 

Tom Rodriguez, Aerospace Engineer, 

International Branch, ANM–116, Transport 

Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind 

Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057–3356; 

telephone 425–227–1137; fax 425–227–1149. 

Information may be emailed to: 9-ANM-116- 

AMOC-REQUESTS@faa.gov. Before using 

any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate 

principal inspector, or lacking a principal 

inspector, the manager of the local flight 

standards district office/certificate holding 

district office. The AMOC approval letter 

must specifically reference this AD. 

(2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any 

requirement in this AD to obtain corrective 

actions from a manufacturer, the action must 

be accomplished using a method approved 

by the Manager, International Branch, ANM– 

116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA; or 

the EASA; or Fokker Service B.V.’s EASA 

DOA. If approved by the DOA, the approval 

must include the DOA-authorized signature. 

(3) Reporting Requirements: A federal 

agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a 

person is not required to respond to, nor 

shall a person be subject to a penalty for 

failure to comply with a collection of 

information subject to the requirements of 

the Paperwork Reduction Act unless that 

collection of information displays a current 

valid OMB Control Number. The OMB 

Control Number for this information 

collection is 2120–0056. Public reporting for 

this collection of information is estimated to 

be approximately 5 minutes per response, 

including the time for reviewing instructions, 

completing and reviewing the collection of 

information. All responses to this collection 

of information are mandatory. Comments 

concerning the accuracy of this burden and 

suggestions for reducing the burden should 

be directed to the FAA at: 800 Independence 

Ave. SW., Washington, DC 20591, Attn: 

Information Collection Clearance Officer, 

AES–200. 

(n) Related Information 

(1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing 

Airworthiness Information (MCAI) EASA 

Airworthiness Directive 2015–0113, dated 

June 22, 2015, for related information. This 

MCAI may be found in the AD docket on the 

Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by 

searching for and locating Docket No. FAA– 

2016–7271. 

(2) For service information identified in 

this AD, contact Fokker Services B.V., 

Technical Services Dept., P.O. Box 1357, 

2130 EL Hoofddorp, the Netherlands; 

telephone +31 (0)88–6280–350; fax +31 

(0)88–6280–111; email technicalservices@

fokker.com; Internet http://

www.myfokkerfleet.com. You may view this 

service information at the FAA, Transport 

Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., 

Renton, WA. For information on the 

availability of this material at the FAA, call 

425–227–1221. 

Issued in Renton, Washington, on June 14, 

2016. 

Dionne Palermo, 

Acting Manager, Transport Airplane 

Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. 2016–14754 Filed 6–22–16; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R07–OAR–2014–0213; FRL–9948–16– 

Region 7] 

Approval and Promulgation of 

Implementation Plans; State of Iowa; 

Infrastructure SIP Requirements for 

the 1997 and 2006 Fine Particulate 

Matter (PM2.5) National Ambient Air 

Quality Standards (NAAQS), and the 

Adoption of the 1997 PM2.5 Standard 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve 

elements of two State Implementation 

Plan (SIP) submissions from the State of 

Iowa for the Infrastructure SIP 

Requirements for the 1997 and 2006 

Fine Particulate Matter (PM2.5) National 

Ambient Air Quality Standards 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
40826 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 121 / Thursday, June 23, 2016 / Proposed Rules 

(NAAQS). Infrastructure SIPs address 

the applicable requirements of Clean Air 

Act (CAA) section 110, which requires 

that each state adopt and submit a SIP 

for the implementation, maintenance, 

and enforcement of each new or revised 

NAAQS promulgated by the EPA. These 

SIPs are commonly referred to as 

‘‘infrastructure’’ SIPs. The infrastructure 

requirements are designed to ensure that 

the structural components of each 

state’s air quality management program 

are adequate to meet the state’s 

responsibilities under the CAA. This 

action also proposes to approve the 

adoption of the 1997 PM2.5 standard. 

On September 8, 2011, EPA issued a 

Finding of Failure to Submit a Complete 

State Implementation Plan for several 

states, including Iowa. With respect to 

Iowa, the Finding of Failure to Submit 

covered the following 2006 PM2.5

NAAQS infrastructure requirements: 

110(a)(2)(A)–(C), (D)(i)(II) (prong 3 

only), (E)–(H) and (J)–(M). This proposal 

to approve Iowa’s infrastructure SIP for 

the 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS addresses the 

September 8, 2011 finding. 

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before July 25, 2016. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R07– 

OAR–2014–0213, to http://

www.regulations.gov. Follow the online 

instructions for submitting comments. 

Once submitted, comments cannot be 

edited or removed from Regulations.gov. 

The EPA may publish any comment 

received to its public docket. Do not 

submit electronically any information 

you consider to be Confidential 

Business Information (CBI) or other 

information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. Multimedia 

submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be 

accompanied by a written comment. 

The written comment is considered the 

official comment and should include 

discussion of all points you wish to 

make. The EPA will generally not 

consider comments or comment 

contents located outside of the primary 

submission (i.e. on the Web, cloud, or 

other file sharing system). For 

additional submission methods, the full 

EPA public comment policy, 

information about CBI or multimedia 

submissions, and general guidance on 

making effective comments, please visit 

http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/

commenting-epa-dockets. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Heather Hamilton, Air Planning and 

Development Branch, U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region 7, 11201 Renner Boulevard, 

Lenexa, KS 66219; telephone number: 

(913) 551–7039; email address: 

Hamilton.heather@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Throughout this document whenever 

‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we refer 

to EPA. A detailed technical support 

document (TSD) is included in this 

rulemaking docket to address the 

following: A description of CAA section 

110(a)(1) and (2) infrastructure SIPs; the 

applicable elements under sections 

110(a)(1) and (2); EPA’s approach to the 

review of infrastructure SIP 

submissions, and EPA’s evaluation of 

how Iowa addressed the relevant 

elements of sections 110(a)(1) and (2). 

This section provides additional 

information by addressing the following 

questions: 

I. What is being addressed in this document? 

II. Have the requirements for approval of a 

SIP revision been met? 

III. What action is EPA taking? 

I. What is being addressed in this 

document? 

The EPA is proposing to approve two 

submissions from the State of Iowa: The 

infrastructure SIP submissions for the 

1997 and 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS received 

on March 31, 2008 and July 29, 2013. 

The SIP submissions from Iowa address 

the requirements of CAA sections 

110(a)(1) and (2) as applicable to the 

1997 and 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS. The 

March 31, 2008 SIP submission also 

included the state adoption of the 1997 

PM2.5 standard. The EPA is also 

proposing to approve this in today’s 

action. 

For the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS, the EPA 

took action to address section 

110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I)—prongs 1 and 2 for 

Iowa. (72 FR 10380, March 8, 2007, as 

revised in 76 FR 48208, August 8, 2011). 

Therefore, in this proposal, we are not 

acting on these portions since they have 

already been acted upon by the EPA. 

A TSD is included as part of the 

docket to discuss the details of this 

proposal. 

II. Have the requirements for approval 

of a SIP revision been met? 

The state submission has met the 

public notice requirements for SIP 

submissions in accordance with 40 CFR 

51.102. The submission also satisfied 

the completeness criteria of 40 CFR part 

51, appendix V. In addition, as 

explained above and in more detail in 

the technical support document which 

is part of this document, the revision 

meets the substantive SIP requirements 

of the CAA, including section 110 and 

implementing regulations. 

III. What action is EPA taking? 

The EPA is proposing to approve two 

submissions from the State of Iowa: The 

infrastructure SIP submissions for the 

1997 and 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS received 

on March 31, 2008 and July 29, 2013. 

The SIP submissions from Iowa address 

the requirements of CAA sections 

110(a)(1) and (2) as applicable to the 

1997 and 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS. This 

action also proposes to approve the 

adoption of the 1997 PM2.5 standard. 

The EPA’s analysis of these 

submissions is addressed in a TSD as 

part of the docket to discuss the 

proposal. 

Based upon review of the state’s 

infrastructure SIP submissions and 

relevant statutory and regulatory 

authorities and provisions referenced in 

those submissions or referenced in 

Iowa’s SIP, the EPA believes that Iowa’s 

SIP will meet all applicable required 

elements of sections 110(a)(1) and (2) 

with respect to the 1997 and 2006 PM2.5

NAAQS. 

We are processing this as a proposed 

action because we are soliciting 

comments on this proposed action. 

Final rulemaking will occur after 

consideration of any comments. 

Statutory and Executive Order Review 

Under the CAA, the Administrator is 

required to approve a SIP submission 

that complies with the provisions of the 

CAA and applicable Federal regulations. 

42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). 

Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, 

EPA’s role is to approve state choices, 

provided that they meet the criteria of 

the CAA. Accordingly, this action 

merely approves state law as meeting 

Federal requirements and does not 

impose additional requirements beyond 

those imposed by state law. For that 

reason, this proposed action: 

• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ under the terms of Executive 

Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 

1993) and is therefore not subject to 

review under Executive Orders 12866 

and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 

2011). 

• Does not impose an information 

collection burden under the provisions 

of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); 

• Is certified as not having a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 

U.S.C. 601 et seq.); 

• Does not contain any unfunded 

mandate or significantly or uniquely 

affect small governments, as described 

in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 121 / Thursday, June 23, 2016 / Proposed Rules 40827 

• Does not have Federalism 

implications as specified in Executive 

Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 

1999); 

• Is not an economically significant 

regulatory action based on health or 

safety risks subject to Executive Order 

13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); 

• Is not a significant regulatory action 

subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 

28355, May 22, 2001); 

• Is not subject to requirements of 

section 12(d) of the National 

Technology Transfer and Advancement 

Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because 

application of those requirements would 

be inconsistent with the CAA; and 

• Does not provide EPA with the 

discretionary authority to address, as 

appropriate, disproportionate human 

health or environmental effects, using 

practicable and legally permissible 

methods, under Executive Order 12898 

(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). 

The SIP is not approved to apply on 

any Indian reservation land or in any 

other area where EPA or an Indian tribe 

has demonstrated that a tribe has 

jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian 

country, the rule does not have tribal 

implications and will not impose 

substantial direct costs on tribal 

governments or preempt tribal law as 

specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 

FR 67249, November 9, 2000). 

Statutory Authority 

The statutory authority for this action 

is provided by section 110 of the CAA, 

as amended (42 U.S.C. 7410). 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Prevention of 

significant deterioration, Incorporation 

by reference, Intergovernmental 

relations, Particulate Matter, Reporting 

and recordkeeping requirements. 

Dated: June 15, 2016. 

Mark Hague, 

Regional Administrator, Region 7. 

For the reasons stated in the 

preamble, EPA proposes to amend 40 

CFR part 52 as set forth below: 

PART 52—Approval and Promulgation 

of Implementation Plans 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 52 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Subpart Q—Iowa 

■ 2. Section 52.820 is amended by 

adding entries (43) and (44) in 

numerical order to table (e) to read as 

follows: 

§ 52.820 Identification of plan. 

* * * * * 

(e) * * * 

EPA-APPROVED IOWA NONREGULATORY SIP PROVISIONS

Name of non-regulatory 

SIP revision 

Applicable 

geographic or 

nonattainment 

area 

State submittal 

date 

EPA approval 

date Explanation 

*******

(43) Sections 110(a)(1) and (2) 

Infrastructure Requirements 

1997 PM2.5 NAAQS.

Statewide .......... 3/21/08 6/23/16 [Insert 

Federal Register citation].

This action addresses the following CAA elements: 

110(a)(2)(A), (B), (C), (D)(i)(II), prong 3, (E), (F), 

(G), (H), (J), (K), (L), and (M). 110(a)(2)(I) is not applicable. 

(44) Sections 110(a)(1) and (2) 

Infrastructure Requirements 

2006 PM2.5 NAAQS.

Statewide .......... 7/23/13 6/23/16 [Insert 

Federal Register citation].

This action addresses the following CAA elements: 

110(a)(2)(A), (B), (C), (D)(i)(II), prong 3, (E), (F), 

(G), (H), (J), (K), (L), and (M). 110(a)(2)(I) is not applicable. 

[FR Doc. 2016–14897 Filed 6–22–16; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R05–OAR–2015–0824; FRL–9948–22– 

Region 5] 

Air Plan Approval; Ohio; Infrastructure 

SIP Requirements for the 2012 PM2.5

NAAQS 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve 

elements of the state implementation 

plan (SIP) submission from Ohio 

regarding the infrastructure 

requirements of section 110 of the Clean 

Air Act (CAA) for the 2012 fine 

particulate matter (PM2.5) National 

Ambient Air Quality Standards 

(NAAQS). The infrastructure 

requirements are designed to ensure that 

the structural components of each 

state’s air quality management program 

are adequate to meet the state’s 

responsibilities under the CAA. 

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before July 25, 2016. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R05– 

OAR–2015–0824 at http://

www.regulations.gov or via email to 

aburano.douglas@epa.gov. For 

comments submitted at Regulations.gov, 

follow the online instructions for 

submitting comments. Once submitted, 

comments cannot be edited or removed 

from Regulations.gov. For either manner 

of submission, EPA may publish any 

comment received to its public docket. 

Do not submit electronically any 

information you consider to be 

Confidential Business Information (CBI) 

or other information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. Multimedia 

submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be 

accompanied by a written comment. 

The written comment is considered the 

official comment and should include 

discussion of all points you wish to 

make. EPA will generally not consider 

comments or comment contents located 

outside of the primary submission (i.e. 

on the Web, cloud, or other file sharing 

system). For additional submission 

methods, please contact the person 

identified in the FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT section. For the 

full EPA public comment policy, 

information about CBI or multimedia 

submissions, and general guidance on 

making effective comments, please visit 

http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/

commenting-epa-dockets. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Joseph Ko, Environmental Engineer, 

Attainment Planning and Maintenance 

Section, Air Programs Branch (AR–18J), 

Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS