alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION

(pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 of Boeing Capital Corporation (the
Company) as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report) and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Kevin R.
Millison, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify that:



|(1) |  | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                 |  |                                           
|---------------- |  | ------------------------------------------
|February 9, 2009 |  | /s/ KEVIN R. MILLISON                     
|                 |  | Kevin R. Millison                         
|                 |  | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



45
1 

### Kelly, Shaheerah

From: Grillo, James [James.Grillo@ct.gov]

Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2013 9:28 AM

To: Kelly, Shaheerah

Subject: RE: Original Montville permit 2010

Attachments: 107-0056 Evaluation for Major Sources _Jan 19 2010_.pdf; 107-0056 Final Memo _April

6.pdf; 107-0056 Permit _Issued 4-6-2010_.pdf



### Shareerah,

I will send you two emails so not to get the files mixed up between the two permit reviews.

Attached are the final permit, technical evaluation, and final memo for the original permit that was issued in 2010.

Just so you know, this source is an existing No. 6/natural gas fired 82 MW EGU that was proposed to be converted to a

42 MW biomass base load plant with the ability to peak at 82 MW on fossil fuel.

If you have any questions let me know.

Jim

From: Kelly, Shaheerah [ mailto:Kelly.Shaheerah@epa.gov ]

Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2013 11:36 AM

To: Grillo, James

Subject: RE:



### Hi Jim,

Thanks for your response. Yes, I would like the original permit and recent modification. I appreciate your help.

************************************

Shaheerah Kelly

U.S. Environmental Protec tion Agency, Region 9

Permits Office, Air Division

San Francisco, CA 94105

Phone: 415-947-4156

Fax: 415-947-3579

Email: kelly.shaheerah@epa.gov

From: Grillo, James [ mailto:James.Grillo@ct.gov ]

Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2013 4:56 AM

To: Kelly, Shaheerah

Subject:

Shaheerah,

Gary Rose forwarded your request for information on the Montville biomass project. There was a major-modification

recently, May 20th, done to that permit incorporate CO2e PSD/BACT as our state rules did not exempt biomass from GHG

PSD.

Let me know if you would like both the original permit an d recent modification along with the supporting documentation

or only the original permit that you referenced in your request. Also, this plant has not been constructed at time, so none

of the emission rates have been verified.2 Jim

James A. Grillo

Air Pollution Control Engineer

CT Dept. of Energy and Environmental Protection

Bureau Of Air Management

Ph: 860-424-3570

E-mail: james.grillo@ct.gov

Website: http://www.ct.gov/deep

From: Kelly, Shaheerah [ mailto:Kelly.Shaheerah@epa.gov ]

Sent: Monday, July 29, 2013 4:15 PM

To: Rose, Gary

Subject: MONTVILLE POWER LLC-NRG ENERGY facility

Dear Gary Rose,

You are listed as the contact for the MONTVILLE POWER LLC

‐ NRG ENERGY facility (RBLC # CT

‐ 0156) in the EPA RACT/BACT/LAER

Clearinghouse (RBLC). I would like to obtain a copy of the final PSD permit issued on 4/6/2010. I would also like to obtain a copy of

the statement of basis and any document that responds to public comments. Please send me these documents or let me know how I

can obtain these documents.

Feel free to contact me for questions.

Thank you.

************************************

Shaheerah Kelly

U.S. Environmental Protec tion Agency, Region 9

Permits Office, Air Division

San Francisco, CA 94105

Phone: 415-947-4156

Fax: 415-947-3579

Email: kelly.shaheerah@epa.gov
#### Mary A. Wilkinson v. Samuel N. Wilkinson.

Motion to dismiss denied. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, McNally, Stevens and Eager, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
balance sheet, statement of income and statement of cash flows contained in
Form 10-Q of Cambridge Electric Light Company for the nine months ended
September 30, 1995 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000016573
<NAME> CAMBRIDGE ELECTRIC LIGHT COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                   SEP-30-1995
<BOOK-VALUE>                      PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>           98,033
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>          9,424
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>              18,433
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>            11,983
<OTHER-ASSETS>                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     137,873
<COMMON>                             8,665
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>           27,953
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                  8,779
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>      45,397
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                    0
<PREFERRED>                              0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                21,865
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                   3,025
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>           0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>       20,160
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>              0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                         0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>      47,426
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>      137,873
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>           95,566
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                 2,042
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>          86,747
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>          88,789
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>              6,777
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                     461
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>       7,238
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>             3,182
<NET-INCOME>                         4,056
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>              0
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>        4,056
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>             2,443
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>            2,834
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>               6,707
<EPS-PRIMARY>                            0
<EPS-DILUTED>                            0
        


</TABLE>
#### 1909.406 Debarment, suspension, and ineligibility.
CIE-K. LINVEMAN 

ER 

11114 , J. 

Saitta 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA 

JASON ARTHUR ALTHEIDE, 

Petitioner, 

vs. 

THE HONORABLE ROBERT W. LANE, 

DISTRICT JUDGE, 

Respondent. 

No. 69745 

FILED 

MAR 1 7 2016 

ORDER DENYING PETITION 

This is a pro se petition for a writ of mandamus. Petitioner 

seeks an order directing the district court to rule on petitions pending 

before it and seeks various other extraordinary remedies. We have 

reviewed the documents submitted in this matter, and without deciding 

upon the merits of any claims raised therein, we decline to exercise 

original jurisdiction in this matter. See NRS 34.160. Accordingly, we 

ORDER the petition DENIED." 

Hardesty 

cc: Jason Arthur Altheide 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Nye County Clerk 

'We also deny petitioner's motions filed under this docket number 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(7) 19474 444S5,9
#### 1602.170-8 FEHBP.

*FEHBP* means the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program.

[52 FR 16038, May 1, 1987. Redesignated at 62 FR 47574, Sept. 10, 1997]
#### In the Matter of Luretha Butts, Petitioner, v Carmen Shang, as Acting Commissioner of the New York State Department of Social Services, et al., Respondents.

— Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, *inter alia,*to review a determination of the State Commissioner of Social Services, dated June 28, 1977 and made after a statutory fair hearing, which affirmed a *683determination of the respondent county commissioner denying petitioner’s request for a grant of supplemental public assistance to replace the stolen proceeds of her assistance check. Determination confirmed and proceeding dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements. The findings of the respondent State commissioner were based upon substantial evidence. Damiani, J. P., Titone, Suozzi and Shapiro, JJ., concur.
- '05222252 Complaint' of '24-00447-F Chicago'
- '05222252 Recipient Notification Letter' of '24-00447-F Chicago'
U.S. Department of Education

1990 K Street, NW, 8th Floor Conference Center

Washington, D.C.

Gainful Employment Negotiated Rulemaking

Committee Meeting 3

December 13, 2013, 9:00am – 5:00pm

AGENDA

1. Opening remarks by Julie Miceli, Deputy General Counsel, U.S. Department of Education

2. Review of November 18‐20, 2013 Rulemaking Committee Meeting Summary

3. Session 3 procedures

4. Review of Session 3 Agenda

5. Review of Committee submissions

6. Overview of changes to draft regulation  

7. Review of data analysis  

8. Call for consensus

9. Next steps

10. Closing remarks by John Kolotos, Federal negotiator, U.S. Department of Education
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
the balance sheet, statement of income and statement of cash flows contained
in Form 10-Q of Cambridge Electric Light Company for the three months ended
March 31, 1997 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000016573
<NAME> CAMBRIDGE ELECTRIC LIGHT COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                            <C>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                   MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-TYPE>                        3-MOS
<BOOK-VALUE>                      PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>          100,118
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>          9,653
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>              21,484
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>            42,804
<OTHER-ASSETS>                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     174,059
<COMMON>                             8,665
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>           27,953
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                 10,082
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>      46,700
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                    0
<PREFERRED>                              0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                21,762
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                  25,670
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>           0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>          100
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>              0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                         0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>      79,827
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>      174,059
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>           33,065
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                   419
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>          31,428
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>          31,847
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>              1,218
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                     438
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>       1,656
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>               807
<NET-INCOME>                           849
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>              0
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>          849
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                 0
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>              430
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                 562
<EPS-PRIMARY>                            0
<EPS-DILUTED>                            0
        


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. 1350

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Cagle’s, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the quarter ended June 27, 2009 (the “Report”), I, J. Douglas Cagle,Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify that:

 

(1) TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| /s/  J. Douglas Cagle                            |   |
|--------------------------------------------------|--------|
| J.  Douglas Cagle                                |   |
| Chairman,  Chief Executive Officer and President |   |
| (Principal  Executive Officer)                   |   |
| Date:  August 10, 2009                      |   |

 

----
4200

4200

4250

4150

4250

4300

4300

4300

4200

4150

4300

4200

B U N K E R H IL L R D

PA R K E R R D

C O R D D

F M 1 7 2 7

G A N D Y R D

F M 1 7 2 7

R IC H A R D S L N

C O R D D

J O H N S O N R D

C O R D D C O R D D

T E L E P H O N E R D

S S E D A N L N F M 1 7 2 7

J O H N S O N L N

T E L E P H O N E R D

C O R D D

N E W S O N R D

F M 1 7 2 7

B U N K E R H IL L R D

PA R K E R R D

C O R D D

F M 1 7 2 7

G A N D Y R D

F M 1 7 2 7

R IC H A R D S L N

C O R D D

J O H N S O N R D

C O R D D C O R D D

T E L E P H O N E R D

S S E D A N L N F M 1 7 2 7

J O H N S O N L N

T E L E P H O N E R D

C O R D D

N E W S O N R D

F M 1 7 2 7

Carrizo

Creek

Carrizo Creek

Bunker Hill

Bunker Hill

Northeast Red

White and Blue Windmill

Wells

Ranch

Windy

Hill

Wharton

Ranch

Windy

Hill NW

Canyon

School

Syndicate

Hills

Bolin

Wells

Ranch

King Beck

Ranch

GV

45'

FV

102°

30"

5'

2' 2'30"

5'

30" 47'

00'

52'

30"

102° 45'

102°

36°

36°

50'

30"

30"

07'

36°

50' 102°

00'

52' 47'30"

4 050 000

280 000 FEET

4 020 000

39

7

7

39

6

39

7

6

6

39

000m

39

39

7

000m

6

39

6

39

6

39

39

6

39

39

39

39

39

6

40

6

39

39

6

000m

39

39

39

6 6 7

39

39

39

39

6

6

92

97

87 N

87

94

96

E

92

95

94

97

94

97

97

93

92

93

94

99

01

00

96

98

95

93 96 02

89

93

01

N

91

98

99

96

89

98

90

00

00

95

92 99

90

88

88

FEET

FEET

260 000 FEET

GA

36°07'30"

FA GA

FV GV E 7

02000m

FV GV

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

TEXAS

ADJOINING 7.5' QUADRANGLES

QUADRANGLE LOCATION

TX 36102-221

WELLS RANCH, TX

2010

Interstate Route State Route

ROAD CLASSIFICATION

Interstate Route US Route State Route

Ramp 4WD

US Route Local Road

WELLS RANCH QUADRANGLE

TEXAS

7.5-MINUTE SERIES

Zone 13S

Imagery...................................................NAIP, August 2008

Roads.....................................US Census Bureau TIGER data

with limited USGS updates, 2005

Names...............................................................GNIS, 2008

Hydrography.................National Hydrography Dataset, 1995

Contours............................National Elevation Dataset, 2002

North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83)

World Geodetic System of 1984 (WGS84). Projection and

1 000-meter grid: Universal Transverse Mercator,

Produced by the United States Geological Survey

10 000-foot ticks: Texas Coordinate System of 1983

(north zone)

1000 500 0 METERS 1000 2000

1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000

FEET

This map was produced to conform with version 0.5.10 of the

draft USGS Standards for 7.5-Minute Quadrangle Maps.

A metadata file associated with this product is also draft version 0.5.10

SCALE 1:24 000

1 0.5 0 1

MILES

MN

1 0.5 0 KILOMETERS 1 2

GN

UTM GRID AND 2010 MAGNETIC NORTH DECLINATION AT CENTER OF SHEET

1° 17 ́

23 MILS

7° 39 ́

136 MILS

U.S. National Grid

100,000-m Square ID

Grid Zone Designation

13S

FV

GA

GV 40 00

7 00

CONTOUR INTERVAL 10 FEET
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Thunder Mountain Gold Inc, (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, E. James Collord, President, Director and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ E. James Collord

By  __________________________________

E.  James Collord

President, Director and Chief Executive Officer

Date:  April 12, 2004
222.1403 Waivers. ( c ) The contracting officer shall submit a waiver request through contracting channels to the labor advisor. If the request is justified, the labor advisor will endorse the request and forward it for action to— ( i ) The agency head for waivers under FAR 22.1403(a). For the defense agencies, waivers must be approved by the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Acquisition.
( ii ) The Secretary of Defense, without the power of redelegation, for waivers under FAR 22.1403(b).
[56 FR 36358, July 31, 1991, as amended at 88 FR 73236, Oct. 25, 2023]
#### Bernard Rosenwald, Plaintiff, v Rego Crescent Corp., Respondent, and Brooklyn Union Gas Company, Appellant. (And Other Actions.)

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, defendant the Brooklyn Union Gas Company appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated March 23, 1978, as granted that branch of the motion of Rego Crescent Corp. to require it to produce for discovery, inspection and copying certain reports, records and photographs. Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, with $50 costs and disbursements, on the opinion of Mr. Justice Hyman at Special Term. We add that since the issue of redaction of the experts’ reports (so as to eliminate such portions thereof as may constitute *opinions)*was not raised by appellant at Special Term, it may not raise such issue before this court (see *American Ind. Contr. Co. v Travelers Ind. Co.,*54 AD2d 679). Titone, J. P., Shapiro, Margett and Martuscello, JJ., concur.
#### 22.1700 Scope of subpart.

This subpart prescribes policy for implementing 22 U.S.C. chapter 78 and Executive Order 13627, Strengthening Protections Against Trafficking in Persons in Federal Contracts, dated September 25, 2012.

[80 FR 4987, Jan. 29, 2015]
**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 **

| (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The                information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Registrant. |
|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                             |                                   |                                          |
|------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------|
|                                                        |                              |                                     |
| Dated                this 23rd                day of March, 2006 | By:                          | /s/              Xiao              Ping Zhang |
|                                                             | Xiao                Ping Zhang         |
|                                                             | Chief                Executive Officer |

----
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Cagles, Inc. for the period ended December 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-Q), I, J. Douglas Cagle, Chief Executive Officer of Cagles, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:



1. The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, and



2. The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: February 7, 2007

By: /s/ J. Douglas Cagle

J. Douglas Cagle

Chief Executive Officer













CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Cagles, Inc. for the period ended December 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-Q), I, Mark M. Ham IV, Chief Financial Officer of Cagles, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:



1. The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, and



2. The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: February 7, 2007

By: /s/ Mark M. Ham IV

Mark M. Ham IV

Chief Financial Officer
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Frederick L. Brown, Also Known as Freddie Lee Brown, Appellant.

— Appeal by *950defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered June 22, 1978, convicting him of grand larceny in the third degree and criminal possession of stolen property in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence as a second felony offender. The appeal also brings up for review a denial of defendant’s motion, *inter alia,*to controvert the People’s statement that the defendant "has been subjected to a predicate felony conviction” for the purpose of being sentenced as a second felony offender. Judgment modified, on the law, by vacating the sentence imposed. As so modified, judgment affirmed and case remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for resentencing in accordance herewith. We find that defendant’s 1971 felony conviction should not be used as a predicate felony for sentencing purposes in the instant case (see CPL 400.21, subd 7, par [b]). The 1971 plea minutes reveal that defendant’s knowledge of the consequences of and alternatives to the plea were not sufficiently explored by the trial court (see *Matter of Chaipis v State Liq. Auth.,*44 NY2d 57, 63-64; cf. *People v Coseia,*56 AD2d 851). Accordingly, the defendant must be resentenced. We have considered the contentions raised by defendant with respect to errors at the trial in the instant case and find them to be without merit. Hopkins, J. P., Titone, Suozzi and Cohalan, JJ., concur.