alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case: 1:12-cv-01864 Document #: 9 Filed: 03/15/12 Page 1 of 11 PageID #:22
Case: 1:12-cv-01864 Document #: 9 Filed: 03/15/12 Page 2 of 11 PageID #:23
Case: 1:12-cv-01864 Document #: 9 Filed: 03/15/12 Page 3 of 11 PageID #:24
Case: 1:12-cv-01864 Document #: 9 Filed: 03/15/12 Page 4 of 11 PageID #:25
Case: 1:12-cv-01864 Document #: 9 Filed: 03/15/12 Page 5 of 11 PageID #:26
Case: 1:12-cv-01864 Document #: 9 Filed: 03/15/12 Page 6 of 11 PageID #:27
Case: 1:12-cv-01864 Document #: 9 Filed: 03/15/12 Page 7 of 11 PageID #:28
Case: 1:12-cv-01864 Document #: 9 Filed: 03/15/12 Page 8 of 11 PageID #:29
Case: 1:12-cv-01864 Document #: 9 Filed: 03/15/12 Page 9 of 11 PageID #:30
Case: 1:12-cv-01864 Document #: 9 Filed: 03/15/12 Page 10 of 11 PageID #:31
Case: 1:12-cv-01864 Document #: 9 Filed: 03/15/12 Page 11 of 11 PageID #:32
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Thunder Mountain Gold Inc, (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, E. James Collord, President, Director and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ E. James Collord

By  __________________________________

E.  James Collord

President, Director and Chief Executive Officer

Date:  April 15, 2005
Certifications:

I, Joseph F. Kruy, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10QSB of Cambex Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being
prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls;
and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls
or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any
corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses.

Date: November 13, 2006

/s/ Joseph F. Kruy
Joseph F. Kruy
President and Treasurer
(principal executive officer and principal financial officer)
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-16-00449-CV

Tracy Jo Mullins

v.

Matt Robert Mullins

§

§

§

§

From County Court at Law No. 2

of Parker County (CIV-16-0139)

July 27, 2017

Opinion by Chief Justice Livingston

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the final decree of 

divorce is reversed and the case is remanded to the trial court for further 

proceedings consistent with this opinion.

It is further ordered that appellee Matt Robert Mullins shall pay all of the 

costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Terrie Livingston

 Chief Justice Terrie Livingston
### How to Apply for Funding: HEERF  II-Institution Portion (CFDA 84.425F)

*Note: Application is only required if  institution did **not**receive a CARES Act HEERF Institutional Portion  award.*

- Instructions for Application
- Grants.gov  Submission Procedures and Tips for Applicants 
- How to upload a Workspace  Applicant Overview Training for Grants.gov  Training Resources for Grants.gov  Endowment Excise Tax Form for Submission- Note: Only institutions subject to the tax described are required to complete and submit this form once.
Letter from the Acting Assistant Secretary (January 14, 2021)Notice Inviting Applications for Funds: (a)(1) Institutional Portion (CFDA 84.425F)Certification & Agreement: (a)(1) Institutional Portion (CFDA 84.425F) (Blue C&A)
*Note: This is for institutions  that did NOT receive CARES Act HEERF Institutional Portion funding. This  completed form must be submitted on Grants.gov as part of the application  process.*
Supplemental Agreement: (a)(1) Institutional Portion (CFDA 84.425F)  
*Note: This is for institutions  that did receive CARES Act HEERF Institutional Portion funding. This document  is provided for reference as an example of the agreement that will be attached  to your institution’s supplemental Grant Award Notification (GAN) when the  supplement is automatically made.*
Formula allocations-  Allocations for Section 314(a)(1) of CCRSAA
-   Methodology for Calculating Allocations 
Frequently Asked Questions- (a)(1)  Frequently Asked Questions   (Issued January 14, 2021, revised March 19, 2021) 

Return to the CRRSAA HEERF II Website here.
  Last Modified: 03/30/2021
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED August 20, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-50283 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JAIME QUIRINO-MARTINEZ, also known as Jaime Perez-Martinez, also known as Roberto Omar Hernandez, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. SA-02-CR-430-ALL

-------------------- Before JONES, WIENER, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Jaime Quirino-Martinez appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United States after deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Quirino contends that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) define separate offenses. He argues that the prior conviction that resulted in his increased sentence is an element of a separate offense under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) that should have beenNo. 03-50283 -2- alleged in his indictment. Quirino maintains that he pleaded guilty to an indictment which charged only simple reentry under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). He argues that his sentence exceeds the two-year maximum term of imprisonment which may be imposed for that offense.
In Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), the Supreme Court held that the enhanced penalties in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are sentencing provisions, not elements of separate offenses. The Court further held that the sentencing provisions do not violate the Due Process Clause. Id. at 239-47. Quirino acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres , but asserts that the decision has been cast into doubt by Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). He seeks to preserve his argument for further review. Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres
. See Apprendi , 530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit , 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000). This court must follow Almendarez-Torres “unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule it.” Dabeit , 231 F.3d at 984 (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). The judgment of the district court is
AFFIRMED. The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 18 (Friday, January 29, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 7610]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-01931]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration #16710 and #16711; OREGON Disaster Number OR-
00111]


Presidential Declaration Amendment of a Major Disaster for Public 
Assistance Only for the State of Oregon

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Amendment 3.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a 
major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of Oregon 
(FEMA-4562-DR), dated 10/20/2020.
    Incident: Wildfires and Straight-line Winds.
    Incident Period: 09/07/2020 through 11/03/2020.

DATES: Issued on 01/22/2021.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 01/13/2021.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 07/20/2021.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alan Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of the President's major disaster 
declaration for Private Non-Profit organizations in the State of 
Oregon, dated 10/20/2020, is hereby amended to include the following 
areas as adversely affected by the disaster.

Primary Counties: Josephine

    All other information in the original declaration remains 
unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

Cynthia Pitts,
Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2021-01931 Filed 1-28-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8026-03-P
217.7404-4 Limitations on obligations. ( a ) The Government shall not obligate more than 50 percent of the not-to-exceed price before definitization. However, if a contractor submits a qualifying proposal before 50 percent of the not-to-exceed price has been obligated by the Government, then the limitation on obligations before definitization may be increased to no more than 75 percent (see 232.102-70 for coverage on provisional delivery payments).
( b ) In determining the appropriate amount to obligate, the contracting officer shall assess the contractor's proposal for the undefinitized period and shall obligate funds only in an amount consistent with the contractor's requirements for the undefinitized period.
[60 FR 29498, June 5, 1995, as amended at 74 FR 37650, July 29, 2009]
Exhibit 32(c)








CERTIFICATION
FURNISHED PURSUANT TO




18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,




AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q of Carolina Power & Light Company (the “Company”) for the
period ending March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Lloyd M. Yates, President and
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:




(1)           the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)           the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.











/s/ Lloyd M.
Yates


Lloyd M.
Yates


President
and Chief Executive Officer


May 8,
2009








This
certification is being furnished and shall not be deemed filed by the Company
for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
or incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, or the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
TS

– 11KK 6F , Physical and Chemical Properties Worksheet, PBT Profiler Estimates

Redacted
### Faulk, Scott (OST) From: 

### Sent: To: 

### Subject: norman clemens <potsdidstop@hotmail.com> Thursday, November 21, 2013 8:54 PM EAS (OST) Seaport ::,I__**·~** i' <-..:: Regarding newcontract for airlines to Kalaupapa, ect I am willingto consider SeaPort due to past history as well as best rates. Norman clemens-author of :"Pots Did Stop"

1
### Preliminary geologic map of the Bethel and southern Russian Mission quadrangles, southwestern Alaska

By: S. E. BoxE. J. Moll-StalcupT. P. FrostJ.M. Murphy

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/mf2226A

#### Links

- More information:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Annual Report of Team, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended May 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ted W. Owen, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                   
|---------------------------------------------------
|/s/ TED W. OWEN                                    
|Ted W. Owen                                        
|Executive Vice President andChief Financial Officer
|August 1, 2011
#### 215.401 Definitions.

As used in this subpart—

*Market prices* means current prices that are established in the course of ordinary trade between buyers and sellers free to bargain and that can be substantiated through competition or from sources independent of the offerors.

*Relevant sales data* means information provided by an offeror of sales of the same or similar items that can be used to establish price reasonableness taking into consideration the age, volume, and nature of the transactions (including any related discounts, refunds, rebates, offsets, or other adjustments).

[83 FR 4443, Jan. 31, 2018]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

EASTERN DISTRICT 

JALIL WILLIAMS, 

 Petitioner 

 v. 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, 

 Respondent 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 38 EM 2016 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 25th day of May, 2016, the Application for Extraordinary Relief is 

DENIED.
1819.7204 Agreement submission and approval process. ( a ) To participate in the Program, entities approved as mentors, will submit a complete agreement package to the contracting officer, contracting officer's representative (COR), and the cognizant Small Business Specialist (SBS) at the NASA Center. The submission package must include the following: ( 1 ) A signed MPA;
( 2 ) A signed protégé application;
( 3 ) The estimated cost of the developmental assistance to be provided, broken out per year and per task, in a separate cost volume; and
( 4 ) A signed letter of endorsement of the agreement by the contracting officer and the contracting officer representative.
( b ) The NASA MPPO may require additional information as requested upon agreement submission.
( c ) The mentor-protégé agreement must be approved by the Assistant Administrator, NASA OSBP, prior to the mentor incurring eligible costs for developmental assistance provided to the protégé.
[80 FR 12938, Mar. 12, 2015, as amended at 88 FR 69885, Oct. 10, 2023]
Exhibit 32(a)








CERTIFICATION FURNISHED PURSUANT TO




18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,




AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Progress Energy, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended March 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, William D. Johnson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)           the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)           the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.











/s/ William D. Johnson


William D. Johnson


Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer


May 8, 2012








This certification is being furnished and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
Mean Annual Washington Precipitation 1961-1990

FIG 13

Mean Annual Oregon Precipitation 1961-1990

FIG 14

 

FIGS 13-14. Mean annual precipitation maps for Washington and Oregon. 

Climatological period: 1961-1990. (Oregon Climate Service)
Exhibit
32.1





SECTION
906 CERTIFICATION





I,
Jeffrey F. O'Donnell, Chief Executive Officer of PhotoMedex, Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the "Company"), do hereby certify, in accordance with 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as created pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:





(1) the
accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended
December 31, 2008 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended; and





(2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





PHOTOMEDEX, INC.Dated:
      March 20, 2009
                By:
                /s/ Jeffrey F. O'DonnellJeffrey F. O'DonnellChief Executive Officer





A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Section
906”), or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting
the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to PhotoMedex, Inc.
and will be retained by PhotoMedex, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### 1652.204-73 Taxpayer Identification Number.

As prescribed in 1604.970, insert the following clause.

# Taxpayer Identification Number (JAN 2000)

(a) *Definitions.* *Common parent,* as used in this provision, means that corporate entity that owns or controls an affiliated group of corporations that files its Federal income tax returns on a consolidated basis, and of which the Carrier is a member.

*Taxpayer Identification Number (TIN),* as used in this provision, means the number required by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) to be used by the Carrier in reporting income tax and other returns.

(b) The Carrier must submit the information required in paragraphs (d) through (f) of this clause to comply with debt collection requirements of 31 U.S.C. 7701(c) and 3325(d), reporting requirements of 26 U.S.C. 6041, 6041A, and 6050M, and implementing regulations issued by the IRS. The Carrier is subject to the payment reporting requirements described in Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 4.904. The Carrier's failure or refusal to furnish the information will result in payment being withheld until the TIN number is provided.

(c) The Government may use the TIN to collect and report on any delinquent amounts arising out of the Carrier's relationship with the Government (31 U.S.C. 7701(c)(3)). The TIN provided hereunder may be matched with IRS records to verify its accuracy.

(d) Taxpayer Identification Number (TIN).

TIN:________________________

(e) Type of organization.

□ Sole proprietorship;

□ Partnership;

□ Corporate entity (not tax-exempt);

□ Corporate entity (tax-exempt);

□ Other ________________________.

(f) Common parent.

□ Carrier is not owned or controlled by a common parent as defined in paragraph (a) of this clause.

□ Name and TIN of common parent:

Name ________________________

TIN ________________________

(End of clause)

[65 FR 36386, June 8, 2000]