alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
balance sheet, statement of income and statement of cash flows contained in
Form 10-Q of Cambridge Electric Light Company for the six months ended June
30, 1999 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000016573
<NAME> CAMBRIDGE ELECTRIC LIGHT COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                            <C>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                   JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-TYPE>                        3-MOS
<BOOK-VALUE>                      PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>           94,637
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>         10,079
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>              16,508
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>            62,104
<OTHER-ASSETS>                      36,077
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     219,405
<COMMON>                             8,665
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>           27,953
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                 12,246
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>      48,864
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                    0
<PREFERRED>                              0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                 7,201
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                       0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>           0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>          100
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>              0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                         0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>     163,240
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>      219,405
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>           54,349
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                    30
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>          52,699
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>          52,729
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>              1,620
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                     772
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>       2,392
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>             2,082
<NET-INCOME>                           310
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>              0
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>            0
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>             4,246
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>              447
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>             (14,038)
<EPS-BASIC>                            0
<EPS-DILUTED>                            0



</TABLE>
file:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/aassem01/Desktop/For%20Rendering/EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0708-DRAFT-0324.txt

-----Forwarded by Melanie King/RTP/USEPA/US on 02/15/2010 09:26PM -----

To: Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov 

From: Melanie King/RTP/USEPA/US 

Date: 02/08/2010 03:46PM 

Subject: Fw: Requested citation for HAPs modeling 

Melanie King 

Energy Strategies Group 

Sector Policies and Programs Division 

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

Mail Code D243-01 

RTP, NC 27711 

Phone: (919) 541-2469 

Fax: (919) 541-5450 

king.melanie@epa.gov 

----- Forwarded by Melanie King/RTP/USEPA/US on 02/08/2010 03:46 PM -----

From:

Amy Lamson/RTP/USEPA/US

To:

Melanie King/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Date:

02/08/2010 03:46 PM

Subject

:

Requested citation for HAPs modeling

Melanie, 

file:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/aassem01/Desk...For%20Rendering/EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0708-DRAFT-0324.txt (1 of 2)2/19/2010 12:50:38 PM
file:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/aassem01/Desktop/For%20Rendering/EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0708-DRAFT-0324.txt

Below is a link to the TSD prepared for RFS2. Please forward to Cortney for distribution. 

http://www.epa.gov/OMS/renewablefuels/454r10001.pdf 

Amy Lamson 

Air Benefit and Cost Group 

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards 

US Environmental Protection Agency 

109 TW Alexander Dr. (C439-02) 

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 

Phone: (919) 541-4383 

Fax: (919) 541-0839 

file:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/aassem01/Desk...For%20Rendering/EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0708-DRAFT-0324.txt (2 of 2)2/19/2010 12:50:38 PM
C. A. No. 73-286.

#### State *v.*Grace C. Crescenzo.

*Julius C. Michaelson,*Attorney General, *Judith Romney Wegner,*Special Asst. Attorney General, for plaintiff. *Nugent & Nugent, J. Joseph Nugent,*for defendant.

Petition for reargument denied.
#### Joseph G. Sidaras, Appellant, v. Daniel J. Cipriano, Respondent.

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injury, arising out of a two-ear collision at an intersection, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of *822the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered November 1, 1963 after a jury trial, dismissing the complaint at the end of plaintiff’s case. Judgment reversed on the law, and a new trial ordered, with costs to plaintiff to abide the event. No questions of fact have been considered. Before the accident, plaintiff had completed a left turn of his automobile at an intersection, and had made two stops and starts, traveling upon the new course. His conduct was not to be appraised, therefore, in the light of the degree of care required of drivers in the act of turning. While defendant’s automobile came from plaintiff’s right and had the right of way, the relative positions, speeds and distances of the two vehicles were such as to require submission to the jury of both the issue of defendant’s negligence and the issue of plaintiff’s contributory negligence; under the. circumstances it was error for the court to decide such issues as matter of law (cf. *Ward*v. *Clark,*232 N. Y. 195). Beldock, P. J., Kleinfeld, Hill and Rabin, JJ., concur; Christ, J., dissents and votes to affirm the judgment, with the following memorandum: In my opinion, the Trial Justice was quite correct in dismissing the complaint. The record shows that the plaintiff was making a left turn in a highway divided by a parkway mall. His car was at a full stop at the intersection when defendant’s automobile was 125 to 150 feet away and was proceeding at a rate of 25 to 30 miles per hour. Plaintiff’s automobile was behind the cover of the shrubbery on the mall, but plaintiff saw defendant’s automobile. Plaintiff nevertheless drove his car from behind this obstruction directly into the face of defendant’s oncoming vehicle. The weather was foggy and misty and it had just stopped raining. Upon this state of facts it was negligence as a matter of law for the plaintiff to proceed. No prudent man would have advanced his automobile into this precarious situation.
#### 223.7403 Procedures.

Contracting officers shall not issue a solicitation for any fire-fighting agent that contains perfluoroalkyl or polyfluoroalkyl substances in excess of one part per billion, unless the requiring activity provides documentation of the exemption at 223.7402. The contracting officer shall maintain the documentation in the contract file.

[89 FR 20871, Mar. 26, 2024]
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**


**STATMON
        TECHNOLOGIES CORP.**


CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


19
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the Annual Report of Statmon Technologies Corp. (the "Company")
      on Form 10-KSB for the year ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
      Geoffrey Talbot, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to 18
      U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that to the best of my knowledge:




(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


**Geoffrey
                P. Talbot**
              Chief
                Executive Officer
              July
                16, 2007




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to Statmon Technologies Corp. and will be
      retained by Statmon Technologies Corp. and furnished to the Securities and
      Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Case: 1:12-cv-03667 Document #: 4 Filed: 05/14/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:28
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2


                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


The Board of Directors
AXCESS Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements on Form
S-8 (Nos. 33-42214, 33-98160, 333-80843 and 333-80857) and on Form S-3
(No. 333-10665) of AXCESS Inc. of our report dated March 19, 1999, relating to
the consolidated balance sheet of AXCESS Inc. and subsidiaries as of December
31, 1998, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders'
equity and cash flows for the year then ended, which report appears in the
December 31, 1999 annual report on Form 10-KSB.

Our report date March 19, 1999 contains an explanatory paragraph that states
that the company's recurring losses from operations and resulting continued
dependence upon access to additional external financing raise substantial doubt
about the company's ability to continue as a going concern. The consolidated
financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the
outcome of this uncertainty.


                                                  KPMG LLP

Dallas, Texas
March 29, 2000
UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL

on

MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION

IN RE: LIBERTY REFUND ANTICIPATION

LOAN LITIGATION MDL No. 2334

(SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE)

CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO−1)

On April 16, 2012, the Panel transferred 3 civil action(s) to the United States District Court for the

Northern District of Illinois for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28

U.S.C. §1407. See _F.Supp.2d_ (J.P.M.L. 2012). Since that time, no additional action(s) have been

transferred to the Northern District of Illinois. With the consent of that court, all such actions have

been assigned to the Honorable Joan B Gottschall.

It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are

common to the actions previously transferred to the Northern District of Illinois and assigned to

Judge Gottschall.

Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict

Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. §1407 to the

Northern District of Illinois for the reasons stated in the order of April 16, 2012, and, with the

consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Joan B Gottschall.

This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States

District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall be

stayed 7 days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the

Panel within this 7−day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel.

FOR THE PANEL:

 Jeffery N. Lüthi

Clerk of the Panel

A TRUE COPY-ATTEST

THOMAS G. BRUTON, CLERK

 -

By: s/ ENJOLI FLETCHER

DEPUTY CLERK

U.S. DISTRICT COURT, NORTHERN

DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

 -

May 1, 2012

Case: 1:12-cv-03241 Document #: 8 Filed: 05/01/12 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:45
IN RE: LIBERTY REFUND ANTICIPATION

LOAN LITIGATION MDL No. 2334

SCHEDULE CTO−1 − TAG−ALONG ACTIONS

DIST DIV. C.A.NO. CASE CAPTION

MARYLAND

MD 1 12−00061 Brown v. JTH Tax, Inc.

NORTH CAROLINA MIDDLE

NCM 1 12−00020 JONES, et al v. JTH TAX, INC.

NCM 1 12−00050 GLOVER v. JTH TAX, INC.

WISCONSIN EASTERN

WIE 2 12−00184 Patterson v. JTH Tax Inc

Case: 1:12-cv-03241 Document #: 8 Filed: 05/01/12 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:46
216.306 Cost-plus-fixed-fee contracts. ( c ) *Limitations.* For contracts in connection with a military construction project or military family housing project, see the prohibition at 216.301-3. ( i ) Except as provided in paragraph (c)(ii) of this section, annual military construction appropriations acts prohibit the use of cost-plus-fixed-fee contracts that— ( A ) Are funded by a military construction appropriations act;
( B ) Are estimated to exceed $25,000; and
( C ) Will be performed within the United States, except Alaska.
( ii ) The prohibition in paragraph (c)(i) of this section does not apply to contracts specifically approved in writing, setting forth the reasons therefor, in accordance with the following: ( A ) The Secretaries of the military departments are authorized to approve such contracts that are for environmental work only, provided the environmental work is not classified as construction, as defined by 10 U.S.C. 2801.
( B ) The Secretary of Defense or designee must approve such contracts that are not for environmental work only or are for environmental work classified as construction.
[62 FR 1058, Jan. 8, 1997; 62 FR 1817, Jan. 13, 1997; 62 FR 49305, Sept. 19, 1997; 71 FR 39007, July 11, 2006; 81 FR 65564, Sept. 23, 2016]
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 31, 2018

No. 04-17-00858-CV

IN THE ESTATE OF RAYMOND OATMAN WHIPPLE, JR., DECEASED,

From the County Court, Guadalupe County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2006-PC-0273

Honorable Robin V. Dwyer, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Pending before the court is the appellant’s motion requesting an extension of time to 

respond to this court’s order dated January 19, 2018, and appellee’s response in opposition to the 

motion. The motion is GRANTED. Appellant must provide the written proof in response to this 

court’s order dated January 19, 2018 no later than February 8, 2018. NO FURTHER 

EXTENSIONS OF TIME WILL BE GRANTED.

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 31st day of January, 2018.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
1816.405-276 Award fee payments and limitations. ( a ) *Interim award fee payments.* The amount of an interim award fee payment (see 1816.405-273(b)) is limited to the lesser of the interim evaluation score or 80 percent of the fee allocated to that interim period less any provisional payments (see paragraph (b) of this subsection) made during the period.
( b ) *Provisional award fee payments.* Provisional award fee payments are payments made within evaluation periods prior to an interim or final evaluation for that period. Provisional payments may be included in the contract and should be negotiated on a case-by-case basis. For a service contract, the total amount of award fee available in an evaluation period that may be provisionally paid is the lesser of a percentage stipulated in the contract (but not exceeding 80 percent) or the prior period's evaluation score. For an end item contract, the total amount of provisional payments in a period is limited to a percentage not to exceed 80 percent of the prior interim period's evaluation score, except for the first evaluation period which is limited to 80 percent of the available award fee for that evaluation period.
( c ) *Fee payment.* The Fee Determination Official's rating for both interim and final evaluations will be provided to the contractor within 45 calendar days of the end of the period being evaluated. Any fee, interim or final, due the contractor will be paid no later than 60 calendar days after the end of the period being evaluated.
[63 FR 13134, Mar. 18, 1998, as amended at 81 FR 50366, Aug. 1, 2016]
#### 1332.003 Simplified acquisition procedures financing.

Contract financing may be provided for purchases made under the authority of FAR Part 13. Contract financing shall be made in accordance with FAR Part 32.
#### Wilson *v.*Duffey.

April 18, 1913.

Complaint. Before Judge Daniel. Henry superior court. Au.gust 19, 1912.

*B. M. Smith*and *Brown & Brown,*for plaintiff in error.

*B. J. Reagan*and *J. F. Wall,*contra.

Hill, J.

1. The only error of law alleged is that the court committed error in instructing the jury as set forth in the excerpt from the charge. This instruction was not error for any reason assigned.

2. The verdict was supported by the evidence, and the court did not err in refusing a new trial.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
#### 209.170-4 Solicitation provision.

Use the provision at 252.209-7011, Representation for Restriction on the Use of Certain Institutions of Higher Education, in solicitations, including solicitations using FAR part 12 procedures for the acquisition of commercial products and commercial services, for acquisitions to an institution of higher education.

[88 FR 67609, Sept. 29, 2023]
#### 22.1026 Disputes concerning labor standards.

Disputes concerning labor standards requirements of the contract are handled under paragraph (t) of the contract clause at 52.222-41, Service Contract Labor Standards, and not under the clause at 52.233-1, Disputes.

[54 FR 19816, May 8, 1989, as amended at 61 FR 39198, July 26, 1996; 72 FR 63081, Nov. 7, 2007; 79 FR 24207, Apr. 29, 2014]
204.404-70 Additional contract clauses. ( a ) Use the clause at 252.204-7000, Disclosure of Information, in solicitations and contracts when the contractor will have access to or generate unclassified information that may be sensitive and inappropriate for release to the public.
( b ) Use the clause at 252.204-7003, Control of Government Personnel Work Product, in all solicitations and contracts.
[57 FR 14992, Apr. 23, 1992, as amended at 64 FR 45197, Aug. 19, 1999; 84 FR 12139, Apr. 1, 2019]
From: Higgins, Cortney [mailto:Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov] 

Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2014 1:34 PM 

To: Wayland, Robertj 

Subject: RE: Wednesday Meeting with DOE 

DOE has a meeting that can’t be moved from 2-5 tomorrow. Are you all still available from 1-2 

tomorrow? I am available at that time, and if we do a call we’ll just get who we get from the EOP. 

From: Wayland, Robertj [mailto:Wayland.Robertj@epa.gov] 

Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2014 1:27 PM 

To: Higgins, Cortney 

Subject: Re: Wednesday Meeting with DOE 

Kevin asks if we can do 4:30-5:30 tomorrow on a call instead of 5-6? 

thanx! 

bob 

Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone on the Verizon Wireless 4G LTE network. 

From: Higgins, Cortney [mailto:Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov] 

Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2014 1:20 PM 

To: Wayland, Robertj 

Subject: RE: Wednesday Meeting with DOE 

Hi Bob, 

What time(s) on Friday works on your end? Is it still the same as it was earlier this week? 

Regards, 

Cortney 
From: Wayland, Robertj [mailto:Wayland.Robertj@epa.gov] 

Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2014 1:16 PM 

To: Higgins, Cortney 

Subject: Re: Wednesday Meeting with DOE 

Kevin doesn't want to do it at all tomorrow to focus on the redline that's coming back to you. I think 

we can get critical mass on the phone, it just likely will not include Kevin. 

 

thanx! 

bob 

Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone on the Verizon Wireless 4G LTE network. 

From: Higgins, Cortney [mailto:Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov] 

Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2014 1:13 PM 

To: Wayland, Robertj 

Subject: RE: Wednesday Meeting with DOE 

Hi Bob, 

Some of the key folks from the EOP are out on Friday – so it’s best to have the discussion on 

Wednesday. Would it be better to do it as a call? 

 

Thanks, 

Cortney 

From: Wayland, Robertj [mailto:Wayland.Robertj@epa.gov] 

Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2014 10:49 AM 

To: Higgins, Cortney 

Subject: Re: Wednesday Meeting with DOE 

Kevin would like to move the Wed meeting to Friday. Do you or DOE have any concerns with that 

approach? Obviously those issues will NOT be dealt with in the redline version for tmrw/Thurs. Just 

let me know your wishes. 

 
thanx! 

bob 

Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone on the Verizon Wireless 4G LTE network.
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       1,001,510
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   31,440
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,371,262
<PP&E>                                      26,767,413
<DEPRECIATION>                              13,959,999
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              14,308,137
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,026,140
<BONDS>                                     14,510,958
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,228,961)<F1>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                14,308,137
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,549,865
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,862,480
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,148,054
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                539,331
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            539,331
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   539,331
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   234.49<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>This entity is a limited partnership. The Other Stockholders Equity line
represents total Partnership equity.
<F2>The EPS-Primary line represents net income per limited partnership unit.
</FN>



</TABLE>
Disclaimer

### State Department of Education

North Dakota Department of Public InstructionDepartment 201600 East Boulevard AvenueBismarck, ND 58505-0440Phone: (701) 328-2260Website: http://www.dpi.state.nd.us

### State Higher Education Agency

North Dakota University System10th Floor, State Capitol600 East Boulevard Avenue, Dept. 215Bismarck, ND 58505-0230Phone: (701) 328-2960Fax: (701) 328-2961Website: http://www.ndus.edu/

### Special Education Agency

Office of Special EducationNorth Dakota State Department of Public InstructionDepartment 201600 East Boulevard AvenueBismarck, ND 58505-0440Phone: (701) 328-2277Website: https://www.nd.gov/dpi/education-programs/special-education

### State Adult Education Agency

Adult Education Unit Department of Public Instruction State Capitol Building 600 East Boulevard Avenue, Department 201 Bismarck, ND 58505-0440 Phone: (701) 328-2393 Fax: (701) 328-4770 Website: https://www.nd.gov/dpi/education-programs/adult-education-ged

Back to state map