alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 735 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 735

 To amend the Endangered Species Act of 1973 to require disclosure to 
States of the basis of determinations under such Act, to ensure use of 
   information provided by State, tribal, and county governments in 
         decisionmaking under such Act, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 27, 2017

   Mr. Enzi (for himself, Mr. Barrasso, Mr. Heller, and Mr. Roberts) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
               Committee on Environment and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Endangered Species Act of 1973 to require disclosure to 
States of the basis of determinations under such Act, to ensure use of 
   information provided by State, tribal, and county governments in 
         decisionmaking under such Act, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``State, Tribal, and Local Species 
Transparency and Recovery Act''.

SEC. 2. REQUIRING DECISIONAL TRANSPARENCY WITH AFFECTED STATES.

    Section 6(a) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 
1535(a)) is amended--
            (1) by inserting ``(1)'' before the first sentence; and
            (2) by striking ``Such cooperation shall include'' and 
        inserting the following:
    ``(2) Such cooperation shall include--
            ``(A) before making a determination under section 4(a), 
        providing to States affected by such determination all data 
        that is the basis of the determination; and
            ``(B)''.

SEC. 3. ENSURING USE OF STATE, TRIBAL, AND LOCAL INFORMATION.

    (a) In General.--Section 3 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 
(16 U.S.C. 1532) is amended--
            (1) by redesignating paragraphs (2) through (21) as 
        paragraphs (3) through (22), respectively; and
            (2) by inserting after paragraph (1) the following:
    ``(2) The term `best scientific and commercial data available' 
includes all such data submitted by a State, tribal, or county 
government.''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 7(n) of such Act (16 U.S.C. 
1536(n)) is amended by striking ``section 3(13)'' and inserting 
``section 3(14)''.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

                                INTERACTIVE DATA
                          FINANCIAL TIMES INFORMATION
                              100 WILLIAM STREET,
                                  15TH FLOOR,
                               NEW YORK, NY 10038
                            USA TEL: (212) 269-6300
                              FAX: (212) 771-6987



                                                                  Exhibit (j)(2)



April 28, 2000


Merrill Lynch, Pierce
Fenner & Smith, Inc.
Unit Investment Trust Division
P.O. Box 9051
Princeton, New Jersey 08543-9051

RE: The GNMA Fund Investment Accumulation Program, Inc.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Gentleman:


    We have examined post-effective Amendment No. 25 to the Registration
Statement on Form N-1A (File No. 2-60367) for the above captioned company. We
hereby acknowledge that Interactive Data Corporation is currently acting as the
evaluator for the company. We hereby consent to the use in the Amendment of the
reference to Interactive Data Corporation, as evaluator.


    You are hereby authorized to file copies of this letter with the Securities
and Exchange Commission.

Very truly yours,


Steven Miano
Director, Fixed Income Data Operations
Case: 1:12-cv-01612 Document #: 11 Filed: 03/22/12 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:30

Case: 1:12-cv-01612 Document #: 11 Filed: 03/22/12 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:31

Case: 1:12-cv-01612 Document #: 11 Filed: 03/22/12 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:32
Exhibit 32(f)








CERTIFICATION FURNISHED PURSUANT TO




18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,




AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Florida Power Corporation (the “Company”) for the period ended March 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Mark F. Mulhern, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)           the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)           the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.











/s/ Mark F. Mulhern


Mark F. Mulhern


Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


May 8, 2012








This certification is being furnished and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           1,825
<SECURITIES>                                     2,587
<RECEIVABLES>                                   36,729
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,297
<INVENTORY>                                     26,598
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               109,003
<PP&E>                                          47,417
<DEPRECIATION>                                  28,407
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 176,983
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           45,720
<BONDS>                                         60,208
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,663
<OTHER-SE>                                      67,692
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   176,983
<SALES>                                         34,731
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                34,731
<CGS>                                           23,086
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   23,086
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   131
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 872
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (13,991)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (3,065)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (10,926)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   1,075
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (9,851)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.65)<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.65)
<FN>
<F1>For Purposes of This Exhibit, Primary Means Basic.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
----

----

|   |                  |   | PHOTOMEDEX, INC.              |   |
|--------|-----------------------|--------|-------------------------------|--------|
|   | Dated: March 31, 2011 |   |                          |   |
|   |                  |   | By: /s/ Christina L. Allgeier |   |
|   |                  |   | Christina L. Allgeier         |   |
|   |                  |   | Chief Financial Officer       |   |

----

----
Rob Wexler is Senior Counsel to the General Counsel at the U.S. Department of Education. He assists the General Counsel and provides advice on cross-cutting education and policy issues, special projects, and strategic planning. He joined the Office of the General Counsel in 1984 and worked in the Business and Administrative Law Division until 1996.

Mr. Wexler also has worked in the White House Office of the Counsel to the President, as Counsel and a Senior Advisor to the President's Initiative for One America, and as a Senior Fellow at the National League of Cities.  He graduated from Brown University and received his law degree from the University of Wisconsin.
#### In the Matter of Government Employees Insurance Company, Respondent, v John Young et al., Appellants. Infinity Insurance Company et al., Proposed Additional Respondents.

[835 NYS2d 283]—

*752In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to permanently stay arbitration of a claim for underinsured motorist benefits, John Young, Gerard Rouse, Ken Rouse, and Bernard Jones appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Ruchelsman, J.), dated May 24, 2006, which granted the petitioner’s motion for leave to reargue, and upon reargument, in effect, granted the petition.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

On June 25, 2000 the appellants were involved in an automobile accident with a motor vehicle insured by the proposed additional respondent Infinity Insurance Company (hereinafter the tortfeasors’ insurer). After the appellants reached a settlement with the tortfeasors’ insurer and received the total sum of $50,000, representing the limits for bodily injury liability under the tortfeasors’ policy, the appellants made a demand for arbitration under the endorsement for supplementary uninsured/underinsured motorist benefits (hereinafter SUM or the SUM endorsement) of a policy issued by the petitioner to nonparty Gail D. Young (hereinafter the Geico policy). The SUM endorsement of the Geico policy was written with a single policy limit for uninsured/underinsured motorist of $25,000/$50,000 for each person/each occurrence. The Geico policy limits for bodily injury liability were also in those amounts.

Contrary to the appellants’ contention, the SUM endorsement of the Geico policy which incorporated the precise requirements for SUM coverage mandated by 11 NYCRR 60-2.3 including, but not limited to, the offset provision, i.e., condition number 6 of the standard form prescribed under 11 NYCRR 60-2.3 (f), was not ambiguous and misleading *(see Matter of Allstate Ins. Co. [Stolarz—New Jersey Mfrs. Ins. Co.],*81 NY2d 219, 224 [1993]; *Matter of State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v Bigler,*18 AD3d 878, 879 [2005]; *Matter of Graphic Arts Mut. Ins. Co. [Dunham],*303 AD2d 1038 [2003]). Pursuant to the offset provi*753sion, the petitioner properly offset the $50,000 received by the appellants from the tortfeasors’ insurer against the SUM limits under the Geico policy, thereby precluding any recovery under the SUM endorsement *(see*11 NYCRR 60-2.1 [c]). Moreover, since the tortfeasors’ policy limits for bodily injury liability were identical to the Geico policy limits for bodily injury liability, the tortfeasors’ vehicle was not underinsured *(see*Insurance Law § 3420 [f] [2] [A]; *Matter of Prudential Prop. & Cas. Co. v Szeli,*83 NY2d 681, 685 [1994]; *Matter of Allstate Ins. Co. v DeMorato, 262*AD2d 557 [1999]; *Matter of Automobile Ins. Co. of Hartford Conn, v Stillway,*165 AD2d 572, 575 [1991]).

The appellants’ remaining contention is without merit. Rivera, J.P., Skelos, Angiolillo and Balkin, JJ., concur.
1516.307 Contract clauses. ( a ) The Contracting Officer shall insert the clause in 1552.216-71, Date of Incurrence of Cost, in cost-reimbursement contracts when an anticipatory cost letter has been issued on the project.
( b ) The Contracting Officer shall insert the clause at 1552.216-74, Payment of Fee, in solicitations and contracts where a cost-reimbursement term form contract is contemplated, unless the Contracting Officer determines that such a provision would be detrimental to ensuring proper contract performance.
( c ) The Contracting Officer shall insert a clause substantially the same as 48 CFR 1552.216-76, Estimated Cost and Cost-Sharing, in solicitations and contracts where the total incurred costs are shared by the contractor on a straight percentage basis. The Contracting Officer may develop other clauses, as appropriate, following the same approach, but reflecting different cost-sharing arrangements negotiated on specific contract actions.
[49 FR 8852, Mar. 8, 1984, as amended at 56 FR 43711, Sept. 4, 1991; 61 FR 14505, Apr. 2, 1996; 61 FR 57338, Nov. 6, 1996]
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

December 28, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 134421 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 134421 

 COA: 274566 

Muskegon CC: 01-046785-FC 

DEYONTA R. ROBINSON, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 21, 2007 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). 

d1217 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

December 28, 2007 

 Clerk
<PAGE>                                                          EXHIBIT 11

                          FIRST COMMERCIAL CORPORATION
                        COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                  (Dollars in thousands, except per share data)



                                              For the Years Ended December 31,
                                             ----------------------------------
                                                1997        1996        1995
                                             ----------  ----------  ----------

Net income before extraordinary items        $   84,634  $   78,554  $   65,234
Extraordinary item, net of income taxes
  of $9,659                                      15,425           -           -
                                             ----------  ----------  ----------
Net income                                   $  100,059  $   78,554  $   65,234
Less: Preferred stock dividend                        -           -           -
                                             ----------  ----------  ----------
Income applicable to common shares           $  100,059  $   78,554  $   65,234
                                             ==========  ==========  ==========

Weighted average number of common shares
   outstanding during the period - Basic     37,486,476  35,648,472  34,221,166

Dilutive potential common shares                435,476     384,813     317,939
                                             ----------  ----------  ----------
Weighted average number of common shares     37,921,952  36,033,285  34,539,105
   assuming dilution                         ==========  ==========  ==========

Basic earnings per common share:
  Net income before extraordinary items           $2.26       $2.20       $1.91
  Extraordinary item                               0.41           -           -
                                                  -----       -----       -----
    Net income per sommon share                   $2.67       $2.20       $1.91
                                                  =====       =====       =====
Diluted earnings per common share:
  Net income before extraordinary items           $2.23       $2.18       $1.89
  Extraordinary item                               0.41           -           -
                                                  -----       -----       -----
    Net income per common share                   $2.64       $2.18       $1.89
                                                  =====       =====       =====
1515.404-470 Policy. ( a ) The Agency's policy is to utilize profit to attract contractors who possess talents and skills necessary to the accomplishment of the objectives of the Agency, and to stimulate efficient contract performance. In negotiating profit/fee, it is necessary that all relevant factors be considered, and that fair and reasonable amounts be negotiated which give the contractor a profit objective commensurate with the nature of the work to be performed, the contractor's input to the total performance, and the risks assumed by the contractor.
( b ) The purpose of EPA's structured approach is: ( 1 ) To provide a standard method of evaluation;
( 2 ) To ensure consideration of all relevant factors;
( 3 ) To provide a basis for documentation and explanation of the profit or fee negotiation objective; and
( 4 ) To allow contractors to earn profits commensurate with the assumption of risk.
( c ) The profit-analysis factors prescribed in the EPA structured approach for analyzing profit or fee include those prescribed by FAR 15.404(d)(1), and additional factors authorized by FAR 15.404(d)(2) to foster achievement of program objectives. These profit or fee factors are prescribed in 1515.404-471.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 11 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 11

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
United States Code, of the final rule of the Bureau of Land Management 
 relating to ``Waste Prevention, Production Subject to Royalties, and 
                        Resource Conservation''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 30, 2017

  Mr. Barrasso (for himself, Mr. Daines, Mr. Inhofe, Mr. Hoeven, Mr. 
Enzi, Mrs. Capito, Mr. McConnell, Mr. Lee, Mr. Sullivan, Mr. Cruz, Ms. 
 Murkowski, Mr. Cornyn, and Mr. Hatch) introduced the following joint 
   resolution; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                      Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
United States Code, of the final rule of the Bureau of Land Management 
 relating to ``Waste Prevention, Production Subject to Royalties, and 
                        Resource Conservation''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management relating to ``Waste 
Prevention, Production Subject to Royalties, and Resource 
Conservation'' (published at 81 Fed. Reg. 83008 (November 18, 2016)), 
and such rule shall have no force or effect.
                                 <all>
```
#### (A) Raul M. Morales, Respondent, v. Leon N. Rodell et al., Partners Doing Business under the Name of Leon N. Rodell Co., Appellants. (B) Therese Pearson, Appellant, v. Herbert Pearson, Respondent. (C) Lawrence Schindo, Appellant, v. Joseph Antinozzi, Respondent.

Motion by respondent to dismiss appeal denied, on condition that appellant [s] perfect the appeal and be ready to argue or submit it at the February Term, beginning January 30, 1961. The appeal is ordered on the calendar for said term. The record and appellant’s brief must be served and filed on or before January 16, 1961. Beldock, Acting P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Pette, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT APRIL 30, 1997 AND THE CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND RETAINED EARNINGS FOR THE NINE MONTHS
ENDED APRIL 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1997
<CASH>                                         752,627
<SECURITIES>                                    13,435
<RECEIVABLES>                                  677,977
<ALLOWANCES>                                    31,448
<INVENTORY>                                     77,103
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       2,225,571
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,019,224
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,105,194
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                      5,126,797
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,723,765
<OTHER-SE>                                 (2,659,253)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,105,194
<SALES>                                      3,665,415
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,013,183
<CGS>                                        2,174,422
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,631,298
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             281,883
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (618,115)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (618,115)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (618,115)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.60)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.60)
        

</TABLE>