alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 21.1
 MAXTOR CORPORATION SUBSIDIARIES 2005-2006
  Maxtor Disc Drives Pty. Limited
    
    AustraliaMaxtor Global Ltd.
    
    BermudaMaxtor Technology (Suzhou) Co. Ltd.
    
    ChinaMaxtor Europe S.àr.l
    
    FranceMaxtor GmbH
    
    GermanyMaxtor (Gibraltar) Limited
    
    GibraltarMaxtor Asia Pacific Limited
    
    Hong KongMaxtor Ireland Limited
    
    IrelandMaxtor (Japan) Ltd.
    
    JapanMaxtor Korea Ltd.
Maxtor Luxembourg
    
    Korea
LuxembourgMaxtor Peripherals (S) Pte. Limited
    
    SingaporeMaxtor International S.àr.l
    
    SwitzerlandMaxtor International Manufacturing S.àr.l
    
    SwitzerlandMaxtor Europe Limited
    
    United KingdomDOMESTIC SUBSIDIARIES:Old SDI Sub
    
    CaliforniaMaxtor Realty Corporation
    
    Delaware
#### Joseph T. Grange, Individually and as Guardian ad Litem of Richard J. Grange, an Infant, Appellant, v. Town of Yorkshire, Respondent, et al., Defendant.

Order modified in accordance with the memorandum and as modified, affirmed, without costs of this appeal to any party. Memorandum: The order dismissed the infant plaintiff’s personal injury action because of, his failure to comply with defendant’s demand for an oral and physical examination pursuant to section 50-h of the General Municipal Law, and also dismissed the father’s derivative action although no demand had been made for any examination of *753him, as claimant. Subdivision 5 of section 50-h provides that no action shall be commenced against the town against which the claim is made unless the claimant has complied with such demand for examination. The infant plaintiff failed to comply with the town’s demand for examination. His action was, therefore, properly dismissed. The law does not prevent the commencement of a derivative action by a father because of failure of the infant claimant to comply therewith. The father’s derivative action is an independent one for damages sustained by him as a result of the injury to the child *(Tidd*v. *Skinner,*225 N. Y. 422, 432; *Cuming*v. *Brooklyn City R. R. Co.,*109 N. Y. 95). The child’s failure to comply with the demand for examination is no bar to the father’s action, and it should not have been dismissed. The order should, therefore, be modified by deleting therefrom the ordering paragraphs thereof and adding the following provision: *“*Ordered that the motion of the defendant, The Town of Yorkshire, New York, be granted as to first cause of action and such cause of action is hereby dismissed; and it is further ordered that in all other respects the motion is denied”. All concur, except Bastow and Noonan, JJ., who dissent in part and as to the infant plaintiff, vote to grant leave to serve a supplemental complaint, if so advised, in the following memorandum: We agree with the majority that the father’s derivative claim was improperly dismissed. It would appear, however, that the infant plaintiff offered to comply with the provisions of section 50-h of the General Municipal Law upon discovery of his default and the offer has been rejected by the defendant. The infant plaintiff should be permitted, in the interests of justice, if so advised, to serve a supplemental complaint setting forth the facts he claims constitute a waiver or estoppel of the right of the defendant to assert the benefits of that section. (Appeal from order of Cattaraugus Special Term granting defendant’s motion dismissing certain causes of action of plaintiffs, except for property damage.) Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Henry, Noonan and Del Vecchio, JJ.
EXHIBIT 31.1
                                                                    ------------


CERTIFICATIONS

I, Charles W. Fischer, President and Chief Executive Officer, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Nexen Inc.

2.  Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.  The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-1(e)) for the registrant and we have:

    (a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

    (b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

    (c)  disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is likely to materially affect,
the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and;

5.  The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent function):

    (a)  all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

    (b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.


Date: May 7, 2004                         /s/ Charles W. Fischer
                                          ----------------------
                                          Charles W. Fischer
                                          President and Chief Executive Officer
#### 225.872 Contracting with qualifying country sources.
Exhibit 23


            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM




         We  consent  to the  incorporation  by  reference  in the  Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (No. 33-36004) of Public Storage,  Inc.,  formerly Storage
Equities,  Inc.,  pertaining  to the 1990 Stock  Option Plan,  the  Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (No.  33-55541)  pertaining to the 1994 Stock Option Plan,
the Registration  Statement on Form S-8 (No.  333-13463)  pertaining to the 1996
Stock Option and Incentive  Plan,  the  Registration  Statement on Form S-8 (No.
333-75327)  pertaining  to the  1994  Share  Incentive  Plan,  the  Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-50270) pertaining to the PS 401(k)/Profit Sharing
Plan, the Registration  Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-52400)  pertaining to the
2000   Non-Executive/Non-Director   Stock  Option  and   Incentive   Plan,   the
Registration   Statement  on  Form  S-8  (333-59218)   pertaining  to  the  2001
Non-Executive/Non-Director  Stock Option and  Incentive  Plan and the 2001 Stock
Option  and  Incentive  Plan,  the  Registration  Statement  on  Form  S-3  (No.
333-81041) and in the related prospectus, the Registration Statement on Form S-4
(No.  333-86899) and in the related  prospectus,  the Registration  Statement on
Form  S-4  (No.  333-84126)  and the  related  prospectus,  in the  Registration
Statement  on Form S-3  (No.  333-101425)  and in the  related  Prospectus,  the
Registration  Statement  on  Form  S-4  (No.  333-103190)  and  in  the  related
prospectus,  the Registration  Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-115660) and in the
related prospectus,  and the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (333-130137) and
in  the  related  prospectus,  the  Registration  Statement  on  Form  S-4  (No.
333-133438)  including the post-effective  Amendment No. 1 on Form S-8 (filed on
August 23, 2006 ) and in the related prospectus,  and the Registration Statement
on Form S-3 (No.  333-136169) and in the related  prospectus of our report dated
February 28, 2007, with respect to Public Storage, Inc. management's  assessment
of the  effectiveness  of internal  control  over  financial  reporting  and the
effectiveness  of internal  control over financial  reporting of Public Storage,
Inc., included in this Form 10-K/A.

                                                               ERNST & YOUNG LLP

March 9, 2007
Los Angeles, California
#### 225.7023 Restriction on acquisition of personal protective equipment and certain other items from non-allied foreign nations.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Lubys, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the
fiscal quarter ended May 7, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Christopher J. Pappas, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                    |  |     |  |                                      
|------------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: June 13, 2008 |  | By: |  | /s/ Christopher J. Pappas            
|                    |  |     |  | Christopher J. Pappas                
|                    |  |     |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

JOHN HENRY GENTRY #20100806111, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) No. 12 C 3304

)

THOMAS DART, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

MEMORANDUM ORDER

John Henry Gentry (“Gentry”) has filed a self-prepared 42

U.S.C. §1983 (“Section 1983”) Complaint against Cook County

Sheriff Thomas Dart and two officers who serve at the Cook County

Department of Corrections (“County Jail”), Officers Norise and

Price, charging that Gentry’s constitutional rights had been

violated during his tenure as a pretrial detainee at the County

Jail. As required by 28 U.S.C. §1915 (“Section 1915”), Gentry

has also tendered an In Forma Pauperis Application

(“Application”), coupled with the required printout reflecting

the transactions in his trust fund account there.

During the relevant six-month period prescribed for purposes

of the Section 1915 calculation, the average monthly deposits to

Gentry’s account (see Section 1915(b)(1)(A)) amounted to $24, so

that the initial partial payment toward the $350 filing fee (20%

of that amount, see id.) comes to $4.80. Accordingly the

Application is granted to the extent that Gentry need not pay the

full $350 filing fee in advance, although he must pay the entire
fee in current and future installments.

Gentry is therefore assessed that initial partial payment of

$4.80, and the County Jail trust fund officer is ordered to

collect that amount from Gentry’s trust fund account and to pay

it directly to the Clerk of Court (“Clerk”):

Office of the Clerk

United States District Court

219 South Dearborn Street

Chicago IL 60604

Attention: Fiscal Department

Both that initial payment and all future payments called for in

this memorandum order shall clearly identify Gentry’s name and

the 12 C 3304 case number assigned to this action. To implement

these requirements, the Clerk shall send a copy of this

memorandum order to the County Jail trust fund officer.

After such initial payment, the trust fund officer at the

County Jail (or at any other correctional facility where Gentry

may hereafter be confined) is authorized to collect monthly

payments from Gentry’s trust fund account in an amount equal to

20% of the preceding month's income credited to the account. 

Monthly payments collected from the trust fund account shall be

forwarded to the Clerk each time the amount in the account

exceeds $10 until the full $350 filing fee is paid.

That said, this Court turns to the Complaint itself. 

Because no claim has been advanced against Sheriff Dart, he is

dismissed as a defendant, while both of the other defendants

2
remain in the case. They should of course be served with

process, and this Court is contemporaneously issuing its

customary initial scheduling order.

________________________________________

Milton I. Shadur

Senior United States District Judge

Date: May 4, 2012

3
#### 1334.005 General requirements.
#### Tupper & Company *et al. v.*Southern Cement Stone Company.

January 23, 1913.

Attachment. Before Judge Conyers. Glynn superior court. November 11, 1911.

*Bolling Whitfield,*for plaintiffs in error.

*D. W. Krauss,*contra.

Lumpkin, J.

The verdict was supported by the evidence, and there was no ei’ror in overruling the motion for a new trial.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
223.7102 Policy. ( a ) 10 U.S.C. 2692 prohibits storage, treatment, or disposal on DoD installations of toxic or hazardous materials that are not owned either by DoD or by a member of the armed forces (or a dependent of the member) assigned to or provided military housing on the installation, unless an exception in 223.7104 applies.
( b ) When storage of toxic or hazardous materials is authorized based on an imminent danger, the storage provided shall be temporary and shall cease once the imminent danger no longer exists. In all other cases of storage or disposal, the storage or disposal shall be terminated as determined by the Secretary of Defense.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

United States of America

,

Plaintiff(s),

v.

Michele DiCosola, 

Defendant(s).

Case No. 12 CR 446

Judge Harry D. Leinenweber

ORDER

 Defendant’s Motion to Sever [ECF No. 195] is granted. Defendant’s Motion for 

Disclosure of Exculpatory and Impeaching Evidence [ECF No. 196] is denied. Defendant’s 

Motion for Disclosure of Signed Indictment and Grand Jury Minutes [ECF No. 197] is granted in 

part. The Government shall submit, for in camera review, competent proof that the 

indictment in this case was returned by a Grand Jury whose term had not expired. Defendant’s 

Motion to Dismiss Count Two of the Indictment [ECF No. 198] is granted.

Time: 0:08

Date: 8/14/2014 /s/ Harry D. Leinenweber

 United States District Judge

Case: 1:12-cr-00446 Document #: 209 Filed: 08/14/14 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:1946
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

# TIME AND DATE: 

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities and Exchange Commission Small Business Capital Formation Advisory Committee will hold a public meeting on Friday, January 29, 2021, via videoconference.

# PLACE: 

                        The meeting will begin at 10:00 a.m. (ET) and will be open to the public. The meeting will be conducted by remote means (videoconference) and/or at the Commission's headquarters, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549. Members of the public may watch the webcast of the meeting on the Commission's website at                         *www.sec.gov.*

# STATUS: 

On January 11, 2021, the Commission published notice of the Committee meeting (Release No. 33-10919), indicating that the meeting is open to the public and inviting the public to submit written comments to the Committee. This Sunshine Act notice is being issued because a majority of the Commission may attend the meeting.

# MATTER TO BE CONSIDERED:

The agenda for the meeting includes matters relating to rules and regulations affecting small and emerging businesses and their investors under the federal securities laws.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed; please contact Vanessa A. Countryman from the Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

Dated: January 22, 2021.

Vanessa A. Countryman, 

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2021-01797 Filed 1-22-21; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
> The Chicago Public Schools (CPS) submitted an agreement to  resolve a Section 504/Title II compliance review that OCR initiated to investigate  whether CPS discriminates against students with disabilities by failing to  ensure that adequate transportation is provided to and from the educational  services to which they are entitled.  Prior to the conclusion of OCR’s  investigation, CPS signed a Resolution Agreement which, when fully implemented,  will ensure that CPS provides transportation services to students with disabilities  when required as a related service by their Individualized Education Programs  (IEPs) or Section 504 Plans.  CPS will publicize and operate a phone system  to promptly troubleshoot transportation-related problems.  Parents of  students with disabilities will receive notice of the phone system on the CPS  website and during each IEP and Section 504 meeting where it is agreed that  transportation will be provided as a related service.  In addition, to  address concerns raised during OCR’s investigation that CPS was not addressing  effectively transportation-related complaints, the agreement requires CPS to  maintain a monthly reporting system to track all such complaints and their  resolutions and all students who did not receive required transportation services,  and to report these results monthly to OCR.  The agreement also requires  CPS to identify students who during the 2009-10, 2010-11, and 2011-12 school  years did not (or do not) receive the transportation services to which they  were (are) entitled.  Notice will be provided to the parents of these  students informing them of their right to reimbursement for costs incurred  in providing transportation to school.  In addition, for any student  who did not attend school for ten or more consecutive school days as a result  of the District’s failure to provide transportation, CPS will convene with  parental consent an IEP or Section 504 meeting to determine if the student  is entitled to compensatory educational services and, if so, will provide those  services in a timely manner.  The agreement also requires CPS to  provide training to school principals to ensure that transportation is provided  for all students who require transportation pursuant to an IEP or Section 504  Plan.  ***Read the Resolution Letter***PDF (250K)    | ***Read the Compliance Agreement***PDF (40K)

Top
**EXHIBIT 31.2** **CERTIFICATIONS**     I, Joseph S. Tesoriero, Vice President and Chief Financial    Officer, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on    Form 10-Q    of Dole Food Company, Inc.;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any    untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material    fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the    circumstances under which such statements were made, not    misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and    other financial information included in this report, fairly    present in all material respects the financial condition,    results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,    and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are    responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls    and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act    Rules 13a-15(e)    and    15d-15(e))    for the registrant and have:     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or    caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed    under our supervision, to ensure that material information    relating to the registrant, including its consolidated    subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those    entities, particularly during the period in which this report is    being prepared;     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s    disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report    our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure    controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by    this report based on such evaluation; and     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the    registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that    occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter    (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an    annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably    likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal    control over financial reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I    have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal    control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s    auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board    of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in    the design or operation of internal control over financial    reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the    registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and    report financial information; and     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves    management or other employees who have a significant role in the    registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. /s/  Joseph    S. Tesoriero    Joseph S. Tesoriero*Vice President and Chief Financial Officer*     July 31, 2007
### April 30, 2015 Sulfentrazone Registration Review EPA/FMC Meeting Please Sign In 

### Nam e Affiliation/Role 

### fit 

### ({fT/ I [ 

# rnc FIY7C Phone/e-mail

**:f-dt~~** - "6 ..,.,.. **~**
**'li).l.lC.M-~.- .**  Jl,l-l€j.i@ ei.A . (;-GV 

## --z 0 .:, - - :::Jc· '>- &' - q 1

_ , q(f)--/:t 1 

### ,n / _ t. 

## / 033o&-oo 

## g

**=ro 3~**  **~o<b- 't.:S**  **~** t-\l'-L- **tL\ttW,~\** Q't'PA - (:.c v 

# > fh o ne__ 

# (!o 3)

**,5o~-** ,)_J_( Y 

# 1
- ny-cornelluniv-1-complaint
- '02242018 Notification Letter' of '24-00520-F New York'