alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Urban area

Intermediate

confining

unit

Surficial aquifer system (sand and clay)

Upper Floridan aquifer (limestone)

Conduit system

Supply

well

Water

table

Generalized groundwater flow

Recharge

Discharge

Simulations of Groundwater Flow and Particle 

Tracking Analysis in the Area Contributing Recharge 

to a Public-Supply Well near Tampa, Florida, 2002-05

National Water-Quality Assessment Program Transport of Anthropogenic 

and Natural Contaminants (TANC) to Public-Supply Wells

U.S. Department of the Interior

U.S. Geological Survey

Scientific Investigations Report 2008-5231
Printed on recycled paper

By C.A. Crandall and others—

n

S

e

i

a

m

r 

u

T

la

am

tio

p

n

a,

s 

 F

o

l

f

or

G

i

r

d

o

a

u

, 

n

2

d

00

w

2

a

-

t

0

e

5

r Flow and Particle Tracking Analysis in the Area Contributing Recharge to a Public-Supply Well —SIR 2008-5231
EXHIBIT 21



                         LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES


     The Partnership is a 25% shareholder in Carlyle Managers, Inc., the
General Partner of JMB/NYC Office Building Associates, L.P. ("JMB/NYC"), an
Illinois limited partnership, which (through 237/1290 Upper Tier
Associates, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership), had (i) (prior to its
sale in March 2001) an indirect limited partnership interest in 1290
Partners, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership, which owns 1290 Avenue of
the Americas in New York, New York, and (ii) (prior to its sale in January
2002) an indirect interest in 237 Park Partners, L.L.C., a Delaware limited
liability company, which owns 237 Park Avenue in New York, New York.  The
partners in the JMB/NYC Office Building Associates, L.P. are affiliates of
the General Partners of the Partnership.  Reference is made to the Notes
for a description of the terms of such joint venture partnerships.  The
Partnership is a 25% shareholder in Carlyle Investors, Inc. which is the
general partner of Carlyle-XIII Associates, L.P., an Illinois limited
partnership.  The Partnership is a 99% limited partner in Carlyle-XIII
Associates, L.P., which holds an approximate 25% limited partnership
interest in JMB/NYC.
_______________________________________ __ _____________ _______________ _____________ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

December 12, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly 133416(47) Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman,
Justices COMMUNITY RESOURCE CONSULTANTS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, SC: 133416 v COA: 269726 Ingham CC: 04-000879-CK PROGRESSIVE MICHIGAN INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant.

On order of the Chief Ju stice, the motion by Coalitio n Protecting Auto No-Fault
for leave to file a brief amicus curiae is considered and it is GRANTED.

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 12, 2007

Clerk
EXHIBIT NO. 32

CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. § 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

§ 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Form 10-K of Colony Bankcorp, Inc. (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2005 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Al D. Ross, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Terry L. Hester, Chief Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company, each hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of our knowledge and belief that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                      
|--------------------------------------
|/s/ Al D. Ross                        
|Al D. Ross                            
|President and Chief Executive Officer 
|March 15, 2006                        
|                                      
|/s/ Terry L. Hester                   
|Terry L. Hester                       
|Chief Financial and Accounting Officer
|March 15, 2006                        

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not,
except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of § 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-30-1997
<CASH>                                          16,852
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,838
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     41,401
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                75,643
<PP&E>                                         166,087
<DEPRECIATION>                                  68,477
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 178,409
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           36,427
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           188
<OTHER-SE>                                      72,718
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   178,409
<SALES>                                         63,723
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                63,723
<CGS>                                           58,253
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   58,253
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,013
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,810)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,073)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,737)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,737)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.13)
        

</TABLE>
#### 22.2110 Contract clause.

Insert the clause at 52.222-62, Paid Sick Leave Under Executive Order 13706, in solicitations and contracts that include the clause at 52.222-6, Construction Wage Rate Requirements, or 52.222-41, Service Contract Labor Standards, where work is to be performed, in whole or in part, in the United States (the 50 States and the District of Columbia).
214.202-5 Descriptive literature. ( c ) *Requirements of invitation for bids.* When brand name or equal purchase descriptions are used, use of the provision at FAR 52.211-6, Brand Name or Equal, satisfies this requirement.
[56 FR 36326, July 31, 1991, as amended at 63 FR 11528, Mar. 9, 1998; 64 FR 55633, Oct. 14, 1999; 69 FR 65090, Nov. 10, 2004]
#### In the Matter of Edward T. Welch, an Attorney, Respondent. Brooklyn Bar Association, Petitioner.

This is a proceeding to discipline respondent, an attorney at law, for professional misconduct upon two charges: (1) that after being retained by a client in a matrimonial action and receiving a retainer fee, respondent allowed a default judgment to be taken against his client and refused to return the retainer fee; and (2) that after being retained by another client in an estate matter and receiving a retainer fee, respondent failed to take any action on behalf of his client and finally returned the papers to the client but refused to return the retainer fee. After a hearing upon the charges before a Referee, the Referee filed his report in which he finds that the charges have been sustained. The petitioner now moves for confirmation of the Referee’s report and for appropriate disciplinary action against respondent. In our opinion the Referee’s findings are amply sustained by the proof. The motion to confirm the Referee’s report is granted. It also appears from the record: (1) that respondent failed to appear in this court or before the Referee, although due notice was given to him; (2) that respondent had persistently ignored every request of the petitioner, prior to the institution of this formal proceeding, to appear and to offer his explanation or defense with respect to the charges made; (3) that he has abandoned the practice of the law due to ill health; and (4) that he has no interest in continuing the practice of the law. Under the circumstances, the respondent should be disbarred. His name is directed to be struck from the roll of attorneys and counselors at law, effective November 16,1964. Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, ICleinfeld, Christ and Brennan, JJ., concur.
#### 225.170 Acquisition from or through other Government agencies.

Contracting activities must apply the evaluation procedures in subpart 225.5 when using Federal supply schedules.

[68 FR 15618, Mar. 31, 2003, as amended at 89 FR 11954, Feb. 15, 2024]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000015840
<NAME> BUTLER MANUFACTURING CO.
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           1,412
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  118,402
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     74,499
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               247,324
<PP&E>                                         230,778
<DEPRECIATION>                                 141,452
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 381,253
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          170,616
<BONDS>                                         39,211<F1>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        12,623
<OTHER-SE>                                     182,468<F2>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   381,253
<SALES>                                        670,211
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               670,279<F3>
<CGS>                                          552,926
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  552,926
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                88,166<F4>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,860
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 25,556
<INCOME-TAX>                                    11,161
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             14,395
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 13,299
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    27,694
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     3.57
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     3.57

<FN>
<F1>Reflects long-term debt, less current maturities
<F2>Reflects other stockholders' equity before deduction of $26 million cost of
treasury stock
<F3>Reflects net sales plus net international joint venture income less net other
expense
<F4>Consists of selling, general and administrative expense
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Appeal No. 1844.

#### Anna Gantz *v.*William J. Hames.

Motion of appellee to affirm the judgment below under Rule 16(g), as amended, is denied. Motion to withdraw said motion is denied as being moot. Motion of appellee for an extension of time to January 31, 1975 in which to file brief is granted. Motion of plaintiff-appellant to strike the brief of defendant*925appellee is granted;

*Aram K. Berberian,*for plaintiff-appellant. *Steven S. Saber,*Asst. City Solicitor, for defendant-appellee.

Paolino and Joslin, JJ. not participating.
#### 1424.104 Contract clauses.

The clause at FAR 52.224-1, Privacy Act Notification, as prescribed in FAR 24.104(a), shall be supplemented in accordance with 1452.224-1.
Case: 1:12-cv-01996 Document #: 18 Filed: 04/10/12 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:49
Case: 1:12-cv-01996 Document #: 18 Filed: 04/10/12 Page 2 of 5 PageID #:50
Case: 1:12-cv-01996 Document #: 18 Filed: 04/10/12 Page 3 of 5 PageID #:51
Case: 1:12-cv-01996 Document #: 18 Filed: 04/10/12 Page 4 of 5 PageID #:52
Case: 1:12-cv-01996 Document #: 18 Filed: 04/10/12 Page 5 of 5 PageID #:53
#### 300 West 154th Street Realty Corp. v. Desa Realty Corp.

Motion to dismiss appeal granted. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, Eager and Bastow, JJ.
<PAGE>
                                                                   Exhibit 10(b)

[Letterhead of SUTHERLAND ASBILL & BRENNAN LLP]


                                  April 25, 2000

The American Franklin Life Insurance Company
#1 Franklin Square
Springfield, Illinois 62713

                Re:  Consent of Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP

Gentlemen:

We hereby consent to the reference to our name under the caption "Legal Matters"
in the Statement of Additional Information filed as part of Post-Effective
Amendment No. 6 to the registration statement on Form N-4 for Separate Account
VA-1 of The American Franklin Life Insurance Company (File No. 333-10489).  In
giving this consent, we do not admit that we are in the category of persons
whose consent is required under Section 7 of the Securities Act of 1933.



                                  Sincerely,

                                  Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP



                                  By: /s/ Stephen E. Roth
                                      ---------------------
                                      Stephen E. Roth, Esq.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6639
GRANVILLE VENEY, Petitioner - Appellant, versus WILLIAM L. SMITH, Warden of the Maryland House of Correction; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND, Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. John R. Hargrove, Senior District Judge. (CA-95-369-HAR) Submitted: November 7, 1996 Decided: November 19, 1996 Before RUSSELL and WIDENER, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.Granville Veney, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Tarra R. DeShields-Minnis, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1994), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104- 132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Veney v. Smith , No. CA-95-369-HAR (D. Md. Apr. 1, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

**Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

** **

In connection with thefiling of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31,2004 (the “Report”) by Cascade Natural Gas Corporation (the “Company”), each ofthe undersigned hereby certifies that:

 

1.                                       TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2.                                       Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to CascadeNatural Gas Corporation and will be retained by Cascade Natural Gas Corporationand furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or staff upon request.

 

 
|   | /s/ W. Brian  Matsuyama                                                    |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | W. Brian  Matsuyama  Vice Chairman, President and Chief Executive  Officer |
|   |                                                                       |
|   |                                                                       |
|   | /s/ J. D. Wessling                                                         |
|   | J.D. Wessling  Chief Financial Officer                                     |

 

----
Publications

### KEY QUESTIONS IN ESA EVALUATIONS

- Is the entity in question a "species" as defined by the ESA?   
- If so, is the "species" threatened or endangered? 

The decision to focus on natural fish is based entirely on ecosystem considerations; the question of the relative merits of hatchery vs. natural fish is a separate issue. Fish are not excluded from ESA consideration simply because some of their direct ancestors may have spent time in a fish hatchery, nor does identifying a group of fish as "natural" as defined here automatically mean that they are part of a listed ESU. For a discussion of artificial propagation of Pacific salmon under the ESA, see Hard et al. (1992).

Therefore, NMFS considers a variety of information in evaluating the level of risk faced by an ESU. Important factors include 1) absolute numbers of fish and their spatial and temporal distribution; 2) current abundance in relation to historical abundance and carrying capacity of the habitat; 3) trends in abundance, based on indices such as dam or redd counts or on estimates of spawner-recruit ratios; 4) natural and human-influenced factors that cause variability in survival and abundance; 5) possible threats to genetic integrity (e.g., from strays or outplants from hatchery programs); and 6) recent events (e.g., a drought or improvements in mainstem passage) that have predictable short-term consequences for abundance of the ESU. Threshold determinations also will focus on natural fish, on the premise that an ESU is not healthy unless a viable population exists in the natural habitat.

Table of Contents
#### 1632.607 Tax credit.

FAR 32.607 has no practical application to FEHBP contracts. The statutory provisions at 5 U.S.C. 8906(c) and (d) authorize joint enrollee and Government contributions to the FEHBP Fund. Because the Fund is comprised of contributions by enrollees as well as the Government, carriers may not offset debts to the Fund by a tax credit which is solely a Government obligation.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Balance Sheet for Thunder Mountain Gold, Inc. at December 31, 1999, and
the Statement of Operation for the year ended December 31, 1999, and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR

<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          36,240
<SECURITIES>                                   510,158
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               546,492
<PP&E>                                         496,445
<DEPRECIATION>                                 226,183
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 784,958
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           27,500
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       486,392
<OTHER-SE>                                     271,066
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   784,958
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               126,817
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   89,767
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 37,050
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    37,050
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.00)










</TABLE>
- ny-binghamton-1-comp
- 'Binghamton' of 'Extra docs March 19'
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                       4,535,557
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  176,179
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,170,472
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,916,893
<PP&E>                                         152,965
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,705,664
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,387,716
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       132,679
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,141,649
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,705,664
<SALES>                                      1,114,929
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,208,835
<CGS>                                        1,257,438
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                9,265,402
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,999,921
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (9,915,685)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (4,382)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (9,920,067)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (9,920,067)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.89)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.89)


</TABLE>