alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ROBERT Ba HAINES 

U.S. Department ofTransportation 

Docket Operations, M-30 

West Building, ground floor 

Room W-12-140 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington. DC 20550 

ATTORNEY AT LAW 

July 10, 2013 

Re: History Flight, Inc., Docket Number F AA-2009-0450 

Dear U.S. DOT: 

''illj~ 'li' 'b ,_ ""' LO I JJL l t·..J 2: I .J 

This is a request for extension of Exemption No. 9332A form 14 CFR (FAR Section)-

Part 119.21 (a)) 119 (g); 91.315 as set forth in the attached notice. 

If there is any additional information required to renew this extension, please contact me. 

RBH/so 

Enclosure 

cc: History Flight, Inc. 

Very truly yours, 

ROBERT B. HAINES 

John Maki~son, Chief Pilot via email Makinsonaviation@gmail.com 

-.: .·•· j ,' r! 1 ;"• •' •• /; : .• ~:·:·: \': r; '-~ ....... ' i;;' 

. ' ., , , ' ' : I' ~:::::' 't='==':'::c ·=·'=======-

-.. ' .·' •.·· 

, • · ; • ! .... ~ · · ·.·' , • • ' • · · . • ·• • • · , · · • r · . · , -

2487 Lamington Road • Bedminster, New Jersey 07921 ~ · T~l: (908) 2:34-0607 • Fax: (908) '234:0669 • vi\V\v.rbh~ih~'staxlaw.com 
Jul 08 13 02:08p Makinson Aviation Warbird 

Date: 312212013 

Exempt:on 1"!::~: 9932A fro~ 14 CFR ~FAR Section) -

Part: 119.21 (aj: 119.5 'g); 91.315 

will expire on 8131/2013. If appropriate. please submit 

your req~esl tc.eX\end this exemption (including the 

docket number FAA-2009-0480) within 30 days of the 

date of this notice. Otherwise. the FAA may not be at:le 

to process your request for exter s.ior. before the 

e:<:piration date. You may either subrrit your request 

electronically through the inte~net us•ng :he Doc.r.et 

Management System web site at: 

http://Regulations.gov! or rT>ail your re-::rv;::;t tn: 

U.S. Department of Transporta:lc-n 

Docket Operations, M-30 

West Build!n;J grolmd floor. 

Room W12-140 

1200 New Jer$ey AvP.m."'• St:: 

Wl'shingto!,, nc 205~0 

Sub~.i:;si:)rl to oth~r ~or:::;tic~":: ;'1-,:· ~.:.'r..ry :-:-:)r:e: ~.-r~~. 

Any request lor e)(tension m11st aneet the 

roquirements of 14 CFR part 11 If ;'ol; :1avc a:r;;ady 

requested an e.>Cti!ns:or ~or ~his exer·:.;;:icr, -:r .~::! I:Jng;:;r 

need this e-xemptian. p'eas~ ig,':lre thiz ""';~,_, 

3862790244 

Robert B. H2fr1es 

Hisrory Flight, fnc 

2487 Lamillqton Road 

Bedminster, fJJ 

079'21 

p.3
Steering Committee

Publications

Transition Steering Committee

The Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services (OSERS) administers programs that assist in educating children and youth with disabilities and provides funding for vocational rehabilitation (VR) services for youth and adults with disabilities. OSERS established the Transition Steering Committee to focus specifically on the services, needs, and outcomes of youth with disabilities who may benefit from the work conducted and services authorized by its program component offices. This committee, also known as "Transition Tigers," includes staff members from both OSERS program component offices:
      -  Office of the Assistant Secretary (OAS)           Office of Policy and Planning (OPP)

        - Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP)
        -  Rehabilitation Services Administration (RSA) 

----

Transition Publications

### ***A Transition Guide to Postsecondary Education and Employment for Students and Youth with Disabilities*, August, 2020**

As students and youth with disabilities prepare to transition to adult life, we must do everything we can to provide them with the information, services, and supports they need to ensure that they have the opportunity to achieve their goals.  To aid in a seamless transition from school to post-school activities, this updated transition guide addresses the following topics:
      - Transition planning: opportunities and programs;
      -  Transition services and requirements, as authorized by IDEA and the Rehabilitation Act;
      -  Education and employment options for students and youth with disabilities after leaving secondary school; and
      -  Supporting the decisions made by students and youth with disabilities.

 ***A Transition Guide to Postsecondary Education and Employment for Students and Youth with Disabilities, August, 2020*** [PDF, 1.8MB]

### ***Collaboration Opportunities: WIOA Youth and Vocational Rehabilitation Programs***

On May 16, 2019, the U.S. Departments of Education and Labor issued a technical assistance resource titled *Collaboration Opportunities: WIOA Youth and Vocational Rehabilitation Programs*. This resource is intended to provide a high-level overview of these two programs and improve coordination of workforce preparation activities and employment services between these two core programs. The document offers strategies and resources to increase collaboration between the State and local agencies under these two programs, as well as program providers, so they may more effectively serve youth with disabilities.
#### 15.508 Discovery of mistakes.

Mistakes in a contractor's proposal that are disclosed after award shall be processed substantially in accordance with the procedures for mistakes in bids at 14.407-4.
> Eastern Michigan University (University) submitted an agreement  to resolve a Title IX compliance review that OCR initiated.  Prior to the conclusion  of OCR’s investigation and any findings, the University asked to enter into  a Voluntary Resolution Agreement which, when fully implemented, will ensure  that the University does not discriminate on the basis of sex in the educational  programs and activities that it operates.  The agreement requires the University  to:  revise its Title IX grievance procedures that address complaints of sex  discrimination, including sexual harassment and sexual assault, and its nondiscrimination  notice and to effectively publish these materials; designate one or more Title  IX coordinators and ensure that they, and other appropriate administrators,  receive appropriate training on Title IX and how to investigate complaints  of sexual harassment; develop, with OCR’s assistance,  an online Title IX training  program that will be completed by its employees, including coaches and residential  assistants; create a committee, including representation from student groups,  the Title IX Coordinator, and others to identify strategies for ensuring that  students understand their rights under Title IX and strategies for the prevention  of sexual harassment/sexual assault incidents, including outreach and educational  activities; revise its existing freshman orientation program and returning  student orientation program to include topics that will cover:   how to recognize  sexual harassment, the connection between alcohol abuse and sexual harassment  and sexual assault, students’ ability to speak with a University counselor  if they are concerned about issues of sexual harassment, the University’s updated  grievance procedures for Title IX complaints, and other information and resources  regarding Title IX; develop procedures for an “on call” contact for victims  of sexual assault;  develop and distribute informational publications for students  on sexual harassment and sexual assault;  host events to raise awareness of  Title IX on campus; conduct climate checks with students on campus to assess  the effectiveness of steps the University has taken pursuant to the agreement;  review its campus police records from 2009-2010 to identify any sexual assault  that was treated solely as a criminal matter  to determine if sexual harassment  occurred in violation of Title IX and whether the remedies provided were effective;  and share information with OCR regarding its response to sexual harassment  complaints for the next few school years. ***Read    the  Resolution Letter***PDF (1.88M)    | ***Read    the Resolution Agreement***PDF (77K)

Top
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 15 (Tuesday, January 26, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 7103]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-01596]



[[Page 7103]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Aging; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis 
Panel; Conference Grants.
    Date: February 25, 2021.
    Time: 2:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institute on Aging, Natcher Building, 7201 
Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Video Meeting).
    Contact Person: Dario Dieguez, Jr, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Branch, National Institute on Aging, 
National Institutes of Health Gateway Building, Suite 2W200, 7201 
Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 827-3101, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#640005160d0b4a000d010311011e240a0d0c4a030b12"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="94f0f5e6fdfbbaf0fdf1f3e1f1eed4fafdfcbaf3fbe2">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging 
Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 19, 2021.
Miguelina Perez,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2021-01596 Filed 1-25-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

FUJITSU LIMITED 

Plaintiff/Counterdefendant, CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:12-CV-3229

 V.

TELLABS OPERATIONS, INC.,

TELLABS, INC., AND

TELLABS NORTH AMERICA, INC.

JUDGE HOLDERMAN 

MAGISTRATE JUDGE COLE

 Defendants/Counterclaimants.

TELLABS OPERATIONS, INC.,

TELLABS, INC., AND

TELLABS NORTH AMERICA, INC.

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

Third-Party Plaintiffs, 

 V.

FUJITSU NETWORK COMMUNICATIONS, INC., 

Third-Party Defendant.

TELLABS OPERATIONS INC.’S, TELLABS, INC.’S, AND TELLABS NORTH AMERICA INC.’S

STATEMENT OF SATISFACTION WITH THE FUJITSU ENTITIES’ COMPLIANCE

Pursuant to the Court’s Order dated October 9, 2014 [Dkt. No. 244], Tellabs Operations, 

Inc., Tellabs, Inc., and Tellabs North America, Inc. (collectively “Tellabs”) file this statement to 

inform the Court that, as of Thursday, October 9, 2014 at 2:17 p.m., Fujitsu Limited and Fujitsu 

Network Communications, Inc. (collectively “Fujitsu”) had fully complied to Tellabs’ 

satisfaction with the Court’s Order of October 7, 2014. Tellabs’ prior statement on October 9, 

2014 [Dkt. No. 243] was intended to reflect and confirm Tellabs’ satisfaction with Fujitsu’s 

compliance at that time. 

Case: 1:12-cv-03229 Document #: 246 Filed: 10/10/14 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:4544
TELLABS’ STATEMENT OF SATISFACTION WITH THE FUJITSU ENTITIES’ COMPLIANCE PAGE 2

Dated: October 10, 2014 /s/ James P. Bradley

Richard O’Malley, Jr.

Robert Leighton

SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP

One South Dearborn Street

Chicago, Illinois 60603

Telephone: 312.853.7000

Facsimile: 312.853.7036

James P. Bradley (admitted pro hac vice)

Texas Bar No. 02826000

Li Chen (admitted pro hac vice)

Texas Bar No. 24001142

Steve Malin (admitted pro hac vice) 

Texas Bar No. 12859750 

Kelley A. Conaty (admitted pro hac vice) 

Texas Bar No. 24040716

Mark A. Dodd (admitted pro hac vice)

Texas Bar No. 24040815

Kristoffer B. Leftwich (admitted pro hac vice) 

Texas Bar No. 24046285 

R. Seth Reich, Jr. (admitted pro hac vice)

Texas Bar No. 24088283

SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP

2001 Ross Avenue 

Suite 3600

Dallas, Texas 75201 

Telephone: 214.981.3300

Facsimile: 214.981.3400

ATTORNEYS FOR TELLABS OPERATIONS, INC.,

TELLABS, INC. AND TELLABS INC. NORTH 

AMERICA, INC.

Case: 1:12-cv-03229 Document #: 246 Filed: 10/10/14 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:4545
TELLABS’ STATEMENT OF SATISFACTION WITH THE FUJITSU ENTITIES’ COMPLIANCE PAGE 3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that, on the 10th day of October 2014, I caused a copy of the foregoing to 

document to be served via mail on counsel of record. 

/s/ Kristoffer Leftwich

Kristoffer Leftwich

Case: 1:12-cv-03229 Document #: 246 Filed: 10/10/14 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:4546
<PAGE>

                               E X H I B I T 2 3.3

              CONSENT OF FRIEDMAN & FRIEDMAN, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 33-5404) pertaining to the 1983 Non-Statutory Stock Option Plan
of ALPNET, Inc. and subsidiaries, and in the Registration Statement (Form S-8
No. 333-06091) pertaining to the ALPNET, Inc. 1996 Executive Stock Option
Plan, of our Auditors' Report dated February 13, 1998 with respect to the
balance sheets of Alpnet Canada Inc. as at December 31, 1997 and 1996 and the
statements of earnings, deficit and changes in financial position for each of
the years ended December 31, 1998, 1997 and 1996, which we have been advised
is included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of ALPNET, Inc. for the year
ended December 31, 1999.

\s\ FRIEDMAN & FRIEDMAN

Chartered Accountants

Montreal, Quebec
March 10, 2000
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection  with the Annual Report of Mountains West  Exploration,  Inc.
(the  "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2001 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report").
I, Robert Doak, CEO of the company, certify, pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge and belief.

        (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
                or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of
                operations of the Company.


                                         /s/ Robert Doak
                                         --------------------------------
                                         Robert Doak, CEO

Dated:  Septermber 23, 2004
#### Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company *v.*Plemons.

November 20, 1912.

Action for damages. Before Judge Fite. Murray superior court. October 23, 1911.

*D.*IF. *Blair*and *G. N.*King, for plaintiff in error.

Evans, P. J.

1. A petition is not open to general demurrer which alleges that a defendant railroad company, at a point where the railroad crosses a public road and passes into and through the farm of a named person, constructed a cattle-guard in such a negligent and careless manner as to injure the plaintiff’s horse by reason of such faulty construction.

2. The statute (Civil Code, § 2699) requires a railroad company to build and maintain “good and sufficient” cattle-guards on each side of every public road where the railroad crosses it. It is inaccurate to instruct the jury that the character of the cattle-guards should be such “as first-class roads use in the construction of their road;” but such inaccuracy of instruction will not require a new trial, where the evidence discloses that no point was made as to the sufficiency of the pattern or kind of cattle-guard employed in the present instance, but the whole case turned on the question whether it was negligence to lay the guards upon the track without fastening them in some way, and there was no evidence of the practice of “first-class roads” in this respect.

3. The evidence authorized the verdict.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
22.1009-4 All possible places of performance not identified. If the contracting officer believes that there may be offerors interested in performing in unidentified places or areas, the contracting officer may use the following procedures: ( a ) Include the following information in the synopsis and solicitation: ( 1 ) That the place of performance is unknown.
( 2 ) The possible places or areas of performance that the contracting officer has already identified.
( 3 ) That the contracting officer will obtain wage determinations for additional possible places of performance if asked to do so in writing.
( 4 ) The time and date by which offerors must notify the contracting officer of additional places of performance.
( b ) Include the information required by paragraphs (a)(2) and (a)(4) of this section in the clause at 52.222-49, Service Contract Labor Standards-Place of Performance Unknown (see 22.1006(f)). The closing date for receipt of offerors' requests for wage determinations for additional possible places of performance should allow reasonable time for potential offerors to review the solicitation and determine their interest in competing. Generally, 10 to 15 days from the date of issuance of the solicitation may be considered a reasonable period of time.
( c ) The procedures in 14.304 shall apply to late receipt of offerors' requests for wage determinations for additional places of performance. However, late receipt of an offeror's request for a wage determination for additional places of performance does not preclude the offeror's competing for the proposed acquisition.
( d ) If the contracting officer receives any timely requests for wage determinations for additional places of performance the contracting officer shall— ( 1 ) Obtain wage determinations for the additional places of performance; and
( 2 ) Amend the solicitation to include all wage determinations and, if necessary, extend the time for submission of final offers.
( e ) If the successful offeror did not make a timely request for a wage determination and will perform in a place of performance for which the contracting officer therefore did not request a wage determination, the contracting officer shall— ( 1 ) Award the contract;
( 2 ) Obtain a wage determination; and
( 3 ) Incorporate the wage determination in the contract, retroactive to the date of contract award and with no adjustment in contract price, pursuant to the clause at 52.222-49, Service Contract Labor Standards-Place of Performance Unknown.
[71 FR 36934, June 28, 2006, as amended at 79 FR 24207, Apr. 29, 2014]
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed February 10, 2015.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-15-00091-CV

XUN HUANG AND YUYING DING, Appellants

V.

RAJESH DALAL, Appellee

On Appeal from the 239th District Court

Brazoria County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 63361

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

This is an appeal from a judgment signed October 29, 2014. On February 5, 

2015, appellants filed a notice that they no longer wish to pursue this appeal, which 

we have construed as a motion to dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1. The 

motion is granted. 

Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Boyce and McCally.
22.406-7 Compliance checking. ( a ) *General.* The contracting officer shall make checks and investigations on all contracts covered by this subpart as may be necessary to ensure compliance with the labor standards requirement of the contract.
( b ) *Regular compliance checks.* Regular compliance checking includes the following activities: ( 1 ) Employee interviews to determine correctness of classifications, rates of pay, fringe benefits payments, and hours worked. (See Standard Form 1445.)
( 2 ) On-site inspections to check type of work performed, number and classification of workers, and fulfillment of posting requirements.
( 3 ) Payroll reviews to ensure that payrolls of prime contractors and subcontractors have been submitted on time and are complete and in compliance with contract requirements.
( 4 ) Comparison of the information in this paragraph (b) with available data, including daily inspector's report and daily logs of construction, to ensure consistency.
( c ) *Special compliance checks.* Situations that may require special compliance checks include— ( 1 ) Inconsistencies, errors, or omissions detected during regular compliance checks; or
( 2 ) Receipt of a complaint alleging violations. If the complaint is not specific enough, the complainant shall be so advised and invited to submit additional information.
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the use in this Registration Statement on Form N-3 of our
report dated February 23, 2000, relating to the financial statements of The
Prudential Discovery Select Group Variable Contract Account, which appear in
such Registration Statement. We also consent to the references to us under the
headings "Experts" and "Financial Highlights" in such Registration Statement.



PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

New York, New York
April 28, 2000
----

----

|   |                  |   | PHOTOMEDEX, INC.                                                    |   |
|--------|-----------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Dated: March 23, 2010 |   |                                                                |   |
|   |                  |   | By: /s/ Christina L. Allgeier                                       |   |
|   |                  |   |        Christina L. Allgeier     |   |
|   |                  |   |        Chief Financial Officer r |   |

----

----
#### 208.7302 Policy.

DoD policy is for maximum participation in the Precious Metals Recovery Program. DoD components shall furnish recovered precious metals contained in the DSCP inventory to production contractors rather than use contractor-furnished precious metals whenever the contracting officer determines it to be in the Government's best interest.

[56 FR 36306, July 31, 1991, as amended at 65 FR 52951, Aug. 31, 2000; 71 FR 39005, July 11, 2006]
Protecting StudentsRace, Color, or National Origin Discrimination

The Office for Civil Rights (OCR) enforces Title  VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibits discrimination based on  race, color, or national origin in programs or activities receiving federal  financial assistance. Issue areas include, Access  to Equal Education Opportunity, Discriminatory  Discipline,  Equal  Opportunities for English Learners, Equal Rights to Public Education Regardless of Immigration/Citizenship Status, Race Discrimination in Special Education, Bullying and Harassment, Supporting  Racial Diversity and Retaliation.

----

 

              - Access to Equal Education Opportunity  Discriminatory Discipline  Equal Educational Opportunities for English Learners  Equal Rights to Public Education Regardless of Immigration/Citizenship Status  Race Discrimination in Special Education  Bullying and Harassment  Supporting Racial Diversity  Retaliation  Shared Ancestry or Ethnic Characteristics        
Please see our Reading Room for a full list of guidance documents on issues related to  Race, Color, or National Origin Discrimination.
                    Last Modified: 03/04/2024