alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>


                                       EXHIBIT 27


<ARTICLE> 5

<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                            DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          26,900
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  708,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (60,700)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,043,600
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                      1,786,700
<COMMON>                                         5,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                     50,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     278,900
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,043,600
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               285,200
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,300
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                7,400
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             130,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 126,700
<INCOME-TAX>                                    48,500
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             78,200
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    78,200
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0




</TABLE>
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS 

Appeal of-- ) 

) 

Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc. ) 

) 

Under Contract No. DAAA09-02-D-0007 ) 

APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: 

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: 

ASBCA No. 58661 

Thomas Barrett, Esq. 

David Newsome, Esq. 

Counsel 

E. Michael Chiaparas, Esq. 

DCMA Chief Trial Attorney 

Carol Matsunaga, Esq. 

Senior Trial Attorney 

Defense Contract Management Agency 

Contract Disputes Resolution Center 

Carson, CA 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice. 

Dated: 13 March 2014 

~Ad= Administrative Judge 

Vice Chairman 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 58661, Appeal of Kellogg Brown & 

Root Services, Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. 

Dated: 

JEFFREY D. GARDIN 

Recorder, Armed Services 

Board of Contract Appeals
#### Gabriel K. Rubin, Appellant-Respondent, v Maxine Rubin, Respondent-Appellant. Gabriel K. Rubin, Appellant, v Maxine Rubin, Respondent.

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered October 25, 1978, which, *inter alia,*denied defendant’s application for counsel fees, unanimously modified, on the law and in the exercise of discretion, without costs or disbursements, to the extent of granting the application for counsel fees and remanding the matter to determine the proper amount thereof and, except as thus modified, affirmed. Plaintiff’s appeal from said order unanimously dismissed, as abandoned, without costs or disbursements. Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered April 21, 1978, denying plaintiff’s motion for a protective order quashing an information subpoena, unanimously affirmed, without costs or disbursements. Defendant moved for *857an order adjudging plaintiff husband to be in contempt for failure to pay alimony arrears, admittedly due, and to post security for alimony, as directed. After a hearing upon reference to determine plaintiff’s assertion of financial inability to pay, the Referee’s report was confirmed and the motion granted. In addition to finding plaintiff to be in contempt and directing payment of arrears and the posting of a bond, the court, *sua sponte,*deemed his opposition papers to have included a prayer for downward modification and reduced the amount of alimony to be paid to $1,166.66 per month, effective March, 1978. When the court was informed that in its decision on the motion to confirm it had overlooked defendant’s request for counsel fees, which had been held in abeyance pending receipt and action on the Referee’s report, the court denied the application on the ground that plaintiff lacked the financial ability in the light of the burdens imposed by the court’s decision directing payment of arrears and current alimony. The refusal to award counsel fees was an abuse of discretion. Section 238 of the Domestic Relations Law provides for the award of counsel fees in the discretion of the court in enforcement proceedings such as these. If defendant, a psychiatrist of no insubstantial means, would be financially burdened by paying counsel fees in these proceedings, it is because he has refused to comply with two prior court orders, which noncompliance necessitated these proceedings. Although plaintiff has appealed from the order confirming the Referee’s report and holding him in contempt, he has not submitted any brief on these issues. Accordingly, we deem his appeal abandoned. Finally, it was proper to deny the motion to quash the information subpoena served upon plaintiff’s counsel in a companion proceeding. No attorney-client privilege is involved in the information sought and, even if it were, plaintiff waived the privilege, at least as to the questions having to do with fee payments to his attorney. Concur — Evans, J. P., Fein, Sullivan, Lupiano and Lynch, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 15 (Tuesday, January 26, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 7101]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-01598]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders; 
Notice of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Deafness and Other 
Communication Disorders Special Emphasis Panel; NIDCD Clinical Trial 
(U01) Review.
    Date: February 24, 2021.
    Time: 1:00 p.m. to 2:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Neuroscience Center, 6001 
Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852 (Telephone Conference 
Call).
    Contact Person: Katherine Shim, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Division of Extramural Activities, NIH/NIDCD, 6001 
Executive Blvd., Room 8351, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-496-8683, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#422923362a27302b2c276c312a2b2f022c2b2a6c252d34"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e38882978b86918a8d86cd908b8a8ea38d8a8bcd848c95">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Deafness and Other 
Communication Disorders Special Emphasis Panel; Chemosensory 
Fellowship Applications Review.
    Date: February 25, 2021.
    Time: 1:30 p.m. to 4:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Neuroscience Center, 6001 
Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852 (Telephone Conference 
Call).
    Contact Person: Sheo Singh, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, 
Scientific Review Branch, Division of Extramural Activities, 6001 
Executive Blvd., Room 8351, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-496-8683, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#fc8f95929b948fbc9295989f98d2929594d29b938a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="93e0fafdf4fbe0d3fdfaf7f0f7bdfdfafbbdf4fce5">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.173, 
Biological Research Related to Deafness and Communicative Disorders, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 19, 2021.
Miguelina Perez,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2021-01598 Filed 1-25-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### In the Matter of the Claim of John Stanich, Respondent, v. Oscar Leventhal, Inc., et al., Appellants. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.

This is an appeal from an award of the Workmen’s Compensation Board denying the request of the appellants for the appointment of an impartial specialist. The decision of the board, dated November 10, 1960, determined there was a continuing causally related disability and thereafter the carrier applied to the board for a review, stating the sole purpose thereof was for consideration of an application for the appointment of an impartial specialist to give an opinion on the question of causally related disability. The board thereafter on December 20, 1960, in denying the review, stated: *“*Based on the preponderance of medical evidence produced the Board finds that the Referee decision is proper and that an examination by an impartial specialist on the question of causally related disability is not warranted.” The appellants on this appeal argue the question of substantial evidence for the finding of causally related disability but that issue was not before the board and accordingly it is not properly here on appeal. *(Matter of Sweatt*v. *Fleahman,*14 A D 2d 964.) As to the decision of the board denying the appointment of an impartial specialist, the record is replete with medical testimony, some seven doctors, and it does not appear that additional medical testimony is necessary or would serve any useful purpose. In *Matter of Perry*v. *Ithaca Delivery & Stor.*(4 A D 2d 919) this court said: *“*The board’s refusal to refer the matter to an impartial specialist involved only the exercise of discretion.” The issue is a matter solely within the province of the board. Decision and award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Present — Bergan, P. J., Gibson, Herlihy, Reynolds and Taylor, JJ.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

                       BRUSH WELLMAN INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                        COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                        FIRST QUARTER ENDED
                                                      -------------------------
                                                      March 28,       March 29,
                                                        1997             1996
                                                        ----             ----
<S>                                                  <C>             <C>        
Primary:
  Average shares outstanding                          16,287,458      16,114,128

  Dillutive stock options based
           on the treasury stock method
           using average market price                    141,099          20,353
                                                     -----------     -----------
                         TOTALS                       16,428,557      16,134,481
                                                     ===========     ===========
  Net Income                                         $ 6,490,000     $ 5,115,000

  Per share amount                                   $      0.39     $      0.32
                                                     ===========     ===========


Fully diluted:
  Average shares outstanding                          16,287,458      16,114,128

  Dillutive stock options based
           on the treasury stock method
           using average market price                    204,037          21,013
                                                     -----------     -----------
                         TOTALS                       16,491,495      16,135,141
                                                     ===========     ===========
  Net Income                                         $ 6,490,000     $ 5,115,000

  Per share amount                                   $      0.39     $      0.32
                                                     ===========     ===========
</TABLE>

                                      15
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 56 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. CON. RES. 56

Providing for the use of the catafalque situated in the Exhibition Hall 
 of the Capitol Visitor Center in connection with memorial services to 
be conducted in the rotunda of the Capitol for the late George Herbert 
           Walker Bush, 41st President of the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            December 3, 2018

   Mr. Blunt (for himself and Ms. Klobuchar) submitted the following 
       concurrent resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Providing for the use of the catafalque situated in the Exhibition Hall 
 of the Capitol Visitor Center in connection with memorial services to 
be conducted in the rotunda of the Capitol for the late George Herbert 
           Walker Bush, 41st President of the United States.

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That the Architect of the Capitol is authorized and directed to 
transfer the catafalque which is situated in the Exhibition Hall of the 
Capitol Visitor Center to the rotunda of the Capitol so that such 
catafalque may be used in connection with services to be conducted 
there for the late George Herbert Walker Bush, 41st President of the 
United States.
                                 <all>
```
Functional Statements > Office of Communications and Outreach

## Office of Communications and Outreach (OCO) 

- OCO Functional Statement
- OCO Organization Chart    PDF (136KB)
- OCO Delegations of Authority
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Project No. 1971-079]

Commission staff will meet with representatives of the Burns Paiute Tribe regarding the proposed Hells Canyon Hydroelectric Project. The meeting will be held via teleconference on January 28, 2020 at 2 p.m. Eastern Standard Time (EST).

                    Members of the public, intervenors, and agencies in the referenced proceeding and Idaho Power Company may attend this meeting; however, participation will be limited to only tribal representatives and Commission staff. If the Burns Paiute Tribe decides to disclose information about a specific location which could create a risk or harm to an archeological site or Native American cultural resource, the public will be excused for that portion of the meeting.[1]                                          If you plan to attend this meeting, please contact Michael Davis at (202) 502-8339 or at                     *michael.davis@ferc.gov*                     by January 25, 2020, to receive contact information.                

Dated: January 11, 2021.

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,

Deputy Secretary.

# Footnotes

1.                             Protection from public disclosure involving this kind of specific information is based upon 18 CFR 4.32(b)(3)(ii) (2020) of the Commission's regulations implementing the Federal Power Act.                    
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. 2021-00859 Filed 1-14-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
Exhibit
      32(e)









**CERTIFICATION
      FURNISHED PURSUANT TO**




**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**




**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**




**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Florida Power Corporation
      (the “Company”) for the period ending September 30, 2006 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jeffrey
      J. Lyash, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)  the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
      applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)  the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.











/s/
      Jeffrey J. Lyash


Jeffrey
      J. Lyash


President
      and Chief Executive Officer


November
      3, 2006








This
      certification is being furnished and shall not be deemed filed by the Company
      for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
      or incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Exchange Act
      of
      1934, as amended, or the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
Exhibit
      32(e)




CERTIFICATION
      FURNISHED PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
      2002


In connection with the Quarterly
      Report on Form 10-Q of Florida Power
      Corporation (the “Company”) for the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, H.
      William Habermeyer, Jr., President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


(1)           the Report fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of
      the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and


(2)           the information
      contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and result of operations of the Company.








/s/ H. William Habermeyer,
      Jr.


H. William
      Habermeyer, Jr.President and Chief Executive OfficerMay 9,
      2006






This
      certification is being furnished and shall not be deemed filed by the Company
      for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
      or incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Exchange Act
      of
      1934, as amended, or the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 30 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 30

 Providing for the reappointment of Steve Case as a citizen regent of 
          the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 2, 2017

  Mr. Perdue (for himself, Mr. Boozman, and Mr. Leahy) introduced the 
 following joint resolution; which was read twice and referred to the 
                 Committee on Rules and Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
 Providing for the reappointment of Steve Case as a citizen regent of 
          the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That, in accordance with 
section 5581 of the Revised Statutes (20 U.S.C. 43), the vacancy on the 
Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution, in the class other 
than Members of Congress, occurring by reason of the expiration of the 
term of Steve Case of Virginia on April 25, 2017, is filled by the 
reappointment of the incumbent. The reappointment is for a term of 6 
years, beginning on the later of April 26, 2017, or the date of the 
enactment of this joint resolution.
                                 <all>
```
1846.7003 Contract clause. For acquisitions with covered contractors as defined in section 1846.7001, use the clause at 1852.246-74, Contractor Counterfeit Electronic Part Detection and Avoidance, in solicitations and contracts, when procuring— ( a ) Electronic parts;
( b ) End items, components, parts, or assemblies containing electronic parts; or
( c ) Services, if the covered contractor will supply electronic parts or components, parts, or assemblies containing electronic parts as part of the service.
208.404 Use of Federal Supply Schedules. ( a ) ( i ) If only one offer is received in response to an order exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold that is placed on a competitive basis, the procedures at 215.371 apply.
( ii ) Departments and agencies shall comply with the review, approval, and reporting requirements established in accordance with subpart 217.7 when placing orders for supplies or services in amounts exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold.
( iii ) When a schedule lists both foreign and domestic items that will meet the needs of the requiring activity, the ordering office must apply the procedures of part 225 and FAR part 25, Foreign Acquisition. When purchase of an item of foreign origin is specifically required, the requiring activity must furnish the ordering office sufficient information to permit the determinations required by part 225 and FAR part 25 to be made.
( iv ) Use the provisions at 252.215-7007, Notice of Intent to Resolicit, and 252.215-7008, Only One Offer, as prescribed at 215.371-6 and 215.408(3), respectively.
[77 FR 39137, June 29, 2012, as amended at 78 FR 38235, June 26, 2013; 80 FR 67255, Oct. 30, 2015; 83 FR 30825, June 29, 2018]
213.402 Conditions for use. ( a ) Individual orders may exceed the simplified acquisition threshold for—
( i ) Brand-name commercial product commissary resale subsistence; and
( ii ) Medical supplies for direct shipment overseas.
[64 FR 2596, Jan. 15, 1999, as amended at 88 FR 6582, Jan. 31, 2023]