7258 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 16 / Wednesday, January 27, 2021 / Notices 

1See Antidumping Duty Order; Barium Chloride 

from the People’s Republic of China, 49 FR 40635 

(October 17, 1984) (Order). 

2See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews, 85 

FR 61928 (October 1, 2020). 

3See CPC’s Letter, ‘‘Notice of Intent to 

Participate,’’ dated October 6, 2020. 

4See CPC’s Letter, ‘‘Fifth Five-Year Review of 

Barium Chloride from China: Substantive Response 

to Notice of Initiation,’’ dated October 30, 2020. 

5See Commerce’s Letter, ‘‘Sunset Reviews 

Initiated on October 1, 2020,’’ dated November 20, 

2020. 

6The scope reflects the HTSUS subheading 

currently in effect. 

7See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision 

Memorandum for the Final Results of the Expedited 

Fifth Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty 

Order on Barium Chloride from the People’s 

Republic of China,’’ dated concurrently with, and 

hereby adopted by, this notice. 

8 Id. 

1 Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing 

Duty Administrative Reviews, 85 FR 63081 (October 

6, 2020) (Initiation Notice). 

from China.1 On October 1, 2020, 

Commerce published the notice of 

initiation of the five-year sunset review 

of the Order, pursuant to section 751(c) 

of the Act of 1930, as amended (the 

Act).2 On October 6, 2020, Commerce 

received a notice of intent to participate 

in this review from Chemical Products 

Corporation (CPC) within the deadline 

specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i).3

CPC claimed interested party status 

under section 771(9)(C) of the Act as a 

manufacturer of a domestic like product 

in the United States. On October 30, 

2020, CPC provided a complete 

substantive response for this review 

within the 30-day deadline specified in 

19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i).4 We received 

no substantive responses from any other 

interested parties, nor was a hearing 

requested. On November 20, 2020, 

Commerce notified the U.S. 

International Trade Commission (ITC) 

that it did not receive an adequate 

substantive response from respondent 

interested parties.5 As a result, pursuant 

to section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19 

CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), Commerce 

conducted an expedited (120-day) 

sunset review of the Order. 

Scope of the Order 

The merchandise covered by the order 

is barium chloride, a chemical 

compound having the formulas BaCl2 or 

BaCl2-2H2O, currently classifiable 

under subheading 2827.39.4500 of the 

Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the 

United States (HTSUS).6 Although the 

HTSUS subheading is provided for 

convenience and customs purposes, the 

written description of the scope of this 

order is dispositive. 

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised in this review, 

including the likelihood of continuation 

or recurrence of dumping in the event 

of revocation and the magnitude of the 

margins likely to prevail if the Order 

were revoked, are addressed in the 

accompanying Issues and Decision 

Memorandum.7 A list of topics 

discussed in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum is included as an 

appendix to this notice. The Issues and 

Decision Memorandum is a public 

document and is on file electronically 

via Enforcement and Compliance’s 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Centralized Electronic Service System 

(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to 

registered users at http://

access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete 

version of the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum can be accessed directly 

on the internet at http://

enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed 

and electronic versions of the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum are identical in 

content. 

Final Results of Sunset Review 

Pursuant to sections 751(c)(1), and 

752(c)(1) and (3) of the Act, Commerce 

determines that revocation of the 

antidumping duty order on barium 

chloride from China would likely lead 

to continuation or recurrence of 

dumping, and that the magnitude of the 

margin likely to prevail is up to 155.50 

percent.8

Administrative Protective Order (APO) 

This notice serves as the only 

reminder to interested parties subject to 

an APO of their responsibility 

concerning the return or destruction of 

proprietary information disclosed under 

APO in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.305. Timely notification of the 

return or destruction of APO materials 

or conversion to judicial protective 

order is hereby requested. Failure to 

comply with the regulations and terms 

of an APO is a violation which is subject 

to sanction. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing these 

final results and notice in accordance 

with sections 751(c), 752(c), and 

777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.218 

and 19 CFR 351.221(c)(5)(ii). 

Dated: January 21, 2021. 

Christian Marsh, 

Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance. 

Appendix 

List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. History of the Order 

V. Legal Framework 

VI. Discussion of the Issues 

1. Likelihood of Continuation or 

Recurrence of Dumping 

2. Magnitude of the Margins Likely To 

Prevail 

VII. Final Results of Sunset Review 

VIII. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2021–01790 Filed 1–26–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–016] 

Passenger Vehicle and Light Truck 

Tires From the People’s Republic of 

China: Rescission, in Part, of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review; 2019–2020 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On October 6, 2020, the 

Department of Commerce (Commerce) 

initiated an administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on passenger 

vehicle and light truck tires (passenger 

tires) from the People’s Republic of 

China (China) for 28 companies. Based 

on the timely withdrawal of requests for 

review, we are now rescinding this 

administrative review with respect to 21 

of these companies. 

DATES: Applicable January 27, 2021. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Peter Shaw or Toni Page, AD/CVD 

Operations, Office VII, Enforcement and 

Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 

(202) 482–0697 or (202) 482–1398, 

respectively. 

Background 

In August 2020, Commerce received 

multiple timely requests to conduct an 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on passenger 

tires from China. Based upon these 

requests, on October 6, 2020, in 

accordance with section 751(a) of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), 

Commerce published a notice of 

initiation of an administrative review 

covering the period August 1, 2019 

through July 31, 2020, with respect to 28 

companies.1 In October and December, 

2020, the following companies 

withdrew their requests for an 

administrative review: Giti Radial Tire 

(Anhui) Company Ltd. (Giti Radial 

Anhui); Giti Tire (Fujian) Company Ltd. 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 16 / Wednesday, January 27, 2021 / Notices 7259 

2 In the Initiation Notice this company was listed 

as Shandong Province Sanli Tire Manufacture Co., 

Ltd. Commerce later confirmed with counsel the 

correct spelling of the company’s name. See 

Memorandum, ‘‘Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review of Passenger Vehicle and Light Truck Tires 

from the People’s Republic of China: Ex-parte 

Phone Call/Email with Shandong Sanli Tire 

Manufactured Co., Ltd.’s Counsel,’’ dated October 

20, 2020. 

3See GTT’s Letter, ‘‘Passenger Vehicle and Light 

Truck Tires from the People’s Republic of China: 

Withdrawal of Request for Administrative Review,’’ 

dated October 20, 2020; see also Grunfeld, 

Desiderio, Lebowitz, Silverman & Klestadt LLP’s 

Letter, ‘‘Withdrawal of Request for the 

Administrative Review of Antidumping Duty Order 

on Passenger Vehicle and Light Truck Tires 

(‘‘PVLT’’) from the People’s Republic of China (A– 

570–016),’’ dated October 21, 2020; DeKieffer & 

Horgan, PLLC’s Letter, ‘‘Passenger Vehicle and 

Light Truck Tires from the People’s Republic of 

China: Partial Withdrawal of Request for 

Administrative Review,’’ dated December 9, 2020; 

Boto’s Letter, ‘‘Passenger Vehicle and Light Truck 

Tires from the People’s Republic of China: 

Withdrawal of Request for Administrative Review,’’ 

dated December 14, 2020; Guofeng’s Letter, 

‘‘Passenger Vehicle and Light Truck Tires from 

People’s Republic of China: Withdrawal of Request 

for Administrative Review,’’ dated December 14, 

2020; Firemax’s Letter, ‘‘Certain Passenger Vehicle 

and Light Truck Tires from the People’s Republic 

of China—Withdrawal of Request for 

Administrative Review,’’ dated December 21, 2020; 

and PCT’s Letter, ‘‘Certain Passenger Vehicle and 

Light Truck Tires from the People’s Republic of 

China—Withdrawal of Request for Administrative 

Review,’’ dated December 22, 2020. 

4See ITG Voma’s Letter, ‘‘Passenger Vehicle and 

Light Truck Tires from the People’s Republic of 

China: Request for Review—2019–2020 Review 

Period,’’ dated August 31, 2020. 

5See ITG Voma’s Letter, ‘‘Passenger Vehicle and 

Light Truck Tires from the People’s Republic of 

China: Withdrawal of Request for Administrative 

Review,’’ dated December 14, 2020. 

(Giti Fujian); Giti Tire (Hualin) 

Company Ltd. (Giti Hualin); Giti Tire 

Global Trading Pte. Ltd. (GTT); Haohua 

Orient International Trade Ltd. (Haohua 

Orient); Prinx Chengshan (Shandong) 

Tire Company Ltd. (PCT); Qingdao 

Lakesea Tyre Co., Ltd. (Lakesea); 

Qingdao Sentury Tire Co. Ltd. (Sentury); 

Riversun Industry Limited (Riversun); 

Safe & Well (HK) International Trading 

Limited (Safe & Well); Sailun Group 

(HongKong) Co., Limited (Sailun HK), 

formerly known as Sailun Jinyu Group 

(Hong Kong) Co., Limited (Sailun Jinyu 

HK); Sailun Group Co., Ltd. (Sailun 

Group), formerly known as Sailun Jinyu 

Group Co., Ltd. (Sailun Jinyu); Sailun 

Tire Americas Inc., formerly known as 

SJI North America Inc. (Sailun 

Americas); Sailun Tire International 

Corp. (Sailun International); Shandong 

Guofeng Rubber Plastics Co., Ltd. 

(Guofeng); Shandong Linglong Tyre Co., 

Ltd. (Linglong); Shandong New 

Continent Tire Co., Ltd. (New 

Continent); Shandong Province Sanli 

Tire Manufactured Co., Ltd. (Sanli); 2

Shandong Wanda Boto Tyre Co., Ltd. 

(Boto); Shouguang Firemax Tyre Co., 

Ltd. (Firemax); and Windforce Tyre Co., 

Limited (Windforce).3

Partial Rescission 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), 

Commerce will rescind an 

administrative review, in whole or in 

part, if a party who requested the review 

withdraws the request within 90 days of 

the date of publication of notice of 

initiation of the requested review. Giti 

Radial Anhui; Giti Fujian; Giti Hualin; 

GTT; Haohua Orient; PCT; Lakesea; 

Sentury; Riversun; Safe & Well; Sailun 

HK; Sailun Group; Sailun Americas; 

Sailun International; Linglong; New 

Continent; Sanli; Boto; Firemax; and 

Windforce timely withdrew their 

requests for an administrative review. 

No other party requested a review of 

these 20 companies. On August 31, 

2020, ITG Voma Corporation (ITG 

Voma), a U.S. importer of passenger 

tires, requested a review of Guofeng.4

On December 14, 2020, ITG Voma 

withdrew their request for an 

administrative review on Guofeng.5

Accordingly, we are rescinding this 

review, in part, with respect to these 21 

companies, pursuant to 19 CFR 

351.213(d)(1). 

The instant review will continue with 

respect to the following companies: 

Qingdao Fullrun Tyre Tech Corp., Ltd.; 

Qingdao Landwinner Tyre Co., Ltd.; 

Qingdao Nexen Tire Corporation; 

Shandong Qilun Rubber Co., Ltd., 

Sumitomo Rubber (Changshu) Co., Ltd.; 

Sumitomo Rubber (Hunan) Co., Ltd.; 

and Zhaoqing Junhong Co., Ltd. 

Assessment 

Commerce will instruct U.S. Customs 

and Border Protection (CBP) to assess 

antidumping duties on all appropriate 

entries. For the companies for which 

this review is rescinded, antidumping 

duties shall be assessed at rates equal to 

the cash deposit of estimated 

antidumping duties required at the time 

of entry, or withdrawal from warehouse, 

for consumption, in accordance with 19 

CFR 351.212(c)(1)(i). Commerce intends 

to issue appropriate assessment 

instructions to CBP no earlier than 35 

days after the publication of this notice 

in the Federal Register. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice serves as a reminder to 

importers of their responsibility under 

19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 

regarding the reimbursement of 

antidumping and/or countervailing 

duties prior to liquidation of the 

relevant entries during this review 

period. Failure to comply with this 

requirement could result in the 

presumption that reimbursement of 

antidumping and/or countervailing 

duties occurred and the subsequent 

assessment of doubled antidumping 

duties. 

Notification Regarding Administrative 

Protective Orders 

This notice also serves as a reminder 

to parties subject to administrative 

protective order (APO) of their 

responsibility concerning the return or 

destruction of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues 

to govern business proprietary 

information in this segment of the 

proceeding. Timely written notification 

of the return/destruction of APO 

materials or conversion to judicial 

protective order is hereby requested. 

Failure to comply with the regulations 

and terms of an APO is a violation 

which is subject to sanction. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

This notice is issued and published in 

accordance with sections 751 and 

777(i)(l) of the Act, and 19 CFR 

351.213(d)(4). 

Dated: January 21, 2021. 

James Maeder, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2021–01798 Filed 1–26–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–549–502] 

Circular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes 

and Tubes From Thailand: Final 

Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review and Final 

Determination of No Shipments, In 

Part; 2018–2019 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) finds that circular welded 

carbon steel pipes and tubes (pipes and 

tubes) from Thailand are being, or are 

likely to be sold, at less than normal 

value during the period of review (POR), 

March 1, 2018 through February 28, 

2019. We further determine that K Line 

Logistics had no shipments during the 

POR. 

DATES: Applicable January 27, 2021. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Toni 

Page, AD/CVD Operations, Office VII, 

Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES