alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           5,695
<SECURITIES>                                     1,968
<RECEIVABLES>                                   96,095
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,835
<INVENTORY>                                     76,590
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               206,105
<PP&E>                                         113,456
<DEPRECIATION>                                (65,748)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 310,057
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           97,324
<BONDS>                                         68,503
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,615
<OTHER-SE>                                     142,615
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   310,057
<SALES>                                        220,781
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               220,781
<CGS>                                          202,101
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  202,101
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                59,312
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,890
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (40,699)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (13,431)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (27,268)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.69)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.69)
        

</TABLE>
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of AXCESS Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period
ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, Allan L. Frank, Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Principal
Accounting and Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as applicable; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods
indicated. /S/ ALLAN L. FRANKAllan L. Frank
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Principal Accounting and Financial Officer Dated: March 31, 2005
**State Attorneys General and Federal Agency Settlements with Schools**

Source: VES analysis of federal and state Attorneys General settlements with for-profit, chain-owned schools. 

ahttp://www.denverpost.com/smart/ci_20172161/colorado-attorney-general-reaches-settlement-westwood-2-

bhttps://www.cfpbmonitor.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/5/2014/11/IL-AG-second-amended-complaint.pdf

cThe $11 million fine was waived because of the school’s inability to pay.

dhttps://www.ftc.gov/news-events/press-releases/2015/05/ashworth-college-settles-ftc-charges-it-misled-students-about

ehttp://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/2013/August/13-civ-953.html#sthash.fla0snpj.dpuf

fhttp://www.ashfordsettlement.com/faqs.html

ghttp://www.ag.ny.gov/press-release/ag-schneiderman-announces-groundbreaking-1025-million-dollar-settlement-profit

h http://www.consumerfinance.gov/about-us/newsroom/consumer-financial-protection-bureau-takes-action-against-bridgepoint-education-inc-illegal-student-lending-practices/

ihttps://www.ftc.gov/news-events/press-releases/2016/12/devry-university-agrees-100-million-settlement-ftc

jhttp://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/education/devry-university-pay-2-75m-false-ads-article-1.2960072

khttps://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2017/07/05/devry-university-agrees-settlement-with-office/zpnTrXXjbHJBEbWtIeIpjO/story.html  

lhttps://www.coloradoattorneygeneral.gov/press/news/2013/12/05/attorney_general_suthers_announces_consumer_protection_settlement_argosy_unive and htttp://www.bizjournals.com/denver/news/2013/12/05/argosy-university-pays-colorado-33m.html    

mhttp://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/article/SF-wins-4-4M-settlement-with-for-profit-art-5559635.php

nhttp://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/profit-college-company-pay-955-million-settle-claims-illegal-recruiting-consumer-fraud-and

ohttp://kentucky.gov/Pages/Activity-Stream.aspx?viewMode=ViewDetailInNewPage&eventID=%7B15E27858-880A-4479-A5F6-B1966D22274F%7D&activityType=PressReleasej

phttp://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/profit-education-company-pay-13-million-resolve-several-cases-alleging-submission-false

qThe Florida AG entered into a voluntary assurance of compliance with Kaplan. http://myfloridalegal.com/webfiles.nsf/WF/JMEE-9L6QDA/$file/KaplanAVC.pdf#sthash.YDI8hEsG.dpuf

rhttp://www.justice.gov/usao-wdtx/pr/profit-college-kaplan-refund-federal-financial-aid-under-settlement-united-states

shttp://www.mass.gov/ago/news-and-updates/press-releases/2014/2014-12-12-salter-college.html#sthash.fla0snpj.dpuf

2
#### Paul R. Sipos, Appellant, v Sheila H. Kelly et al., Respondents.

Amended order unanimously modified, on the law, and, as modified, affirmed, without costs, in accordance with the following memorandum: The trial court hearing a contempt proceeding regarding custody, without notice to appellant or appellant’s counsel, modified by reducing the appellant father’s visitation privileges. Recognizing the broad discretionary power the courts possess in custody matters (Domestic Relations Law, § 240; CPLR 3017, subd [a]), it is nevertheless plainly improper for a trial court to take action and grant relief without the matter being properly before it or without appropriate notice to one of the parties affected. The statute itself provides that upon an application the court may modify a previous direction with respect to the right to visitation "after such notice to the other party * * * and given in such manner as the court shall direct” (Domestic Relations Law, § 240). We agree with appellant’s contention that informal *1023notice during the course of the proceeding that undemanded relief would be granted does not constitute adequate notice and prejudices him (Siegel, Practice Commentaries, McKinney’s Cons Laws of NY, Book 7B, CPLR 3017:6, p 115). Consequently, that part of the order appealed from may not stand. Respondent may be able to demonstrate that the appellant’s right to visitation should be modified. However, such an application, should respondent be so advised, must be upon appropriate notice to appellant. (Appeal from order of Erie Supreme Court—contempt.) Present—Cardamone, J. P., Dillon, Hancock, Jr., Schnepp and Witmer, JJ.
Exhibit 10(a)

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

Quantitative Master Series Trust:

We consent to the  incorporation by reference in Amendment No. 7 to Registration
Statement No. 811-7885 of Quantitative  Master Series Trust of our reports dated
as follows:

February 15, 2000   Master International (Capitalization Weighted) Index Series
February 16, 2000   Master Mid Cap Index Series
February 22, 2000   Master S&P 500 Index Series
February 22, 2000   Master Small Cap Index Series
February 22, 2000   Master Aggregate Bond Index Series
February 22, 2000   Master International (GDP Weighted) Index Series
February 24, 2000   Master Enhanced International Index Series

appearing in their respective annual reports to shareholders for the year ended
December 31, 1999.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
-------------------------
Deloitte & Touche LLP
Princeton, New Jersey
April 28, 2000
The Office of Educational Technology (OET) develops educational technology policy and establishes strategies for encouraging the development and use of educational technology. This work includes supporting research to improve learning outcomes and developing, disseminating and updating the National Education Technology Plan. It works with offices across the Department to keep staff and leadership apprised of trends in educational technology and collaborates with a diverse group of stakeholders to improve learning outcomes and to transform teaching and learning to empower students and families.

For additional information, please see: https://tech.ed.gov/.
The Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Annual Reports provide summary statistics, by principal office, of the activities conducted in the administration of the FOIA Program. 

#### 2023 Report

- Chief FOIA Officer Report  PDF  (775KB)

#### 2022 Report

- Annual FOIA Officer's Report  PDF  (922K) |  XML  (826KB) |  XLSX  (raw data) (443KB)
- Chief FOIA Officer Report  PDF  (774KB)

#### 2021 Report

- Annual FOIA Report  PDF  (1,200KB) |  XML  (833KB) |  XLSX  (raw data) (444KB) 
- Chief FOIA Officer's Report  PDF  (743K)

#### 2020 Report

- Annual FOIA Report  PDF  (1.4MB) |  XML  (863KB) |  XLSX  (raw data) (444KB) 
- Chief FOIA Officer's Report  PDF  (752K)

#### 2019 Report

- Annual FOIA Report  PDF  (2MB) |  XML  (827KB) |  XLSX  (raw data) (498KB) 
- Chief FOIA Officer's Report  PDF  (428K)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         180,832
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 263,038
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          180,832
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      82,206
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   263,038
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,558,238
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,510,757
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                47,481
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.44
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.44
        

</TABLE>
216.402-2 Performance incentives. ( 1 ) See PGI 216.402-2 for guidance on establishing performance incentives.
( 2 ) Contracting officers shall ensure requirements about the payment of incentive fees or the imposition of penalties are included in the solicitation for a contract for the engineering and manufacturing development or production of a weapon system, including embedded software, if the program manager or comparable requiring activity official exercising program manager responsibilities includes— ( i ) Provisions for the payment of incentive fees to the contractor, based on achievement of design specification requirements for reliability and maintainability of weapons systems under the contract; or
( ii ) The imposition of penalties to be paid by the contractor to the Government for failure to achieve such design specification requirements (10 U.S.C. 4328).
[71 FR 39007, July 11, 2006, as amended at 84 FR 58333, Oct. 31, 2019; 87 FR 15818, Mar. 18, 2022; 87 FR 76992, Dec. 16, 2022]
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 107 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 107

 Congratulating the rifle team of West Virginia University on winning 
 the 2017 National Collegiate Athletic Association Rifle Championship.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 30, 2017

   Mrs. Capito (for herself and Mr. Manchin) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Congratulating the rifle team of West Virginia University on winning 
 the 2017 National Collegiate Athletic Association Rifle Championship.

Whereas, in 2017, the West Virginia University Mountaineers rifle team (referred 
        to in this preamble as the ``Mountaineers'') completed an undefeated 
        regular season with a record of 12 wins and no losses and won the Great 
        America Rifle Conference championship for the eighth consecutive year;
Whereas, on March 11, 2017, the Mountaineers won the National Collegiate 
        Athletic Association (referred to in this preamble as the ``NCAA'') 
        Rifle Championship;
Whereas the 2017 NCAA Rifle Championship is the fifth consecutive title for the 
        Mountaineers;
Whereas the Mountaineers have now won 19 national championships, securing team 
        NCAA titles in 1983, 1984, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1990, 1991, 1992, 1993, 
        1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 2009, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, and 2017;
Whereas the Mountaineers have won more national championships than any other 
        rifle program in the United States;
Whereas the Mountaineers shot a championship-record 4723 aggregate score at the 
        2017 NCAA Rifle Championship;
Whereas freshman Milica Babic won the 2017 NCAA air rifle championship;
Whereas freshman Morgan Phillips won the NCAA smallbore title and earned the Top 
        Performer Award of the NCAA Rifle Championship;
Whereas the Mountaineers swept the NCAA individual titles in 2017, the fifth 
        time that shooters from the Mountaineers have swept the individual 
        championships; and
Whereas Head Coach Jon Hammond and all members of the Mountaineers, including 
        Jack Anderson, Will Anti, Milica Babic, Noah Barker, Elizabeth Gratz, 
        Jean-Pierre Lucas, Morgan Phillips, and Ginny Thrasher, completed a 
        record performance to claim the 2017 national title: Now, therefore, be 
        it
    Resolved, That the Senate congratulates the West Virginia 
University rifle team on winning the 2017 National Collegiate Athletic 
Association Rifle Championship.
                                 <all>
```
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS'



      We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-30450, 333-65568, 333-73318, and 333-104481) of
YDI Wireless, Inc. of our report dated February 10, 2003, except for Note 2, as
to which the date is July 9, 2003, relating to the consolidated financial
statements and financial statement schedule of YDI Wireless, Inc. and
Subsidiaries (formerly Young Design, Inc. and Subsidiaries) as of December 31,
2002 and 2001 which appears in the company's Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for
the year ended December 31, 2003.


/s/ Fitzgerald, Snyder & Co., P.C.
----------------------------------
Fitzgerald, Snyder & Co., P.C.
(formerly Hoffman, Fitzgerald & Snyder, P.C.)
McLean, Virginia
March 24, 2004
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.26

January 18, 2000

Kenneth V. Rousseau
1341 Cerro Verde
San Jose, California  95120

Dear Ken,

It gives us a great pleasure to extend this offer to employment to join Virage
Logic Corporation. Virage Logic is an emerging semiconductor startup and we
believe that you can make a significant contribution to our company.

Your position will be Vice President, Software Development, reporting to Adam
Kablanian. In this position you will receive a salary of $5,769.23 bi-weekly
($150,000 annualized). You will also be eligible to participate in the VIP
Program. Your target bonus is 25% of your base salary. Virage Logic will
reimburse you relocation costs to move personal belongings and provide
transportation for you and your family to Seattle after one year of employment.

In addition to this, we would like to offer you 200,000 (Two Hundred Thousand)
shares of Virage Logic Corporation to be vested over four years and subject to
the board of directors approval. In the event that your employment is terminated
for reason other than for cause, following a change of control during your first
12 months of employment you will immediately vest 25% of your shares.

You will have the opportunity to participate according to the terms of the
respective plans, in a comprehensive package of benefits, including 401K,
medical, dental and vision coverage. In addition, you will be eligible for 3
weeks Paid Time Off and 10 paid holidays per year.

This offer is contingent upon your ability to present documentation evidencing
your compliance with terms of the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986, as
well as your signing the "Employment Invention and Confidential Information
Agreement." I have enclosed a copy of the Employment Invention and Confidential
Information Agreement for your review.

Further, this offer does not constitute, and may not be construed as, a
commitment to employment for any specific duration. Your employment with the
company will be at-will, which means that you may leave the Company or the
Company may require you to leave its employ, at any time, and for any reason.



<PAGE>   2

Kenneth V. Rousseau
January 18, 2000
Page 2

This letter sets forth the exclusive terms of your offer of employment, and you
acknowledge that you have not relied on any representations or statements,
whether oral or written, regarding your employment with Virage Logic.

Your signature below will signify your acceptance of our employment offer.
Retain the enclosed copy of this letter for your records. Ken, we are excited
about the opportunity to have you join our Company. We certainly look forward to
a prompt and positive reply to this offer by January 21, 2000.

Very truly yours,

Remae Hogan
Human Resources Manager



/s/ Kenneth V. Rousseau                     31 January 2000
------------------------------------        ------------------------------------
Signature of Applicant                      Start Date
#### 22.1002-6 Executive Order 13706.

Executive Order 13706 establishes paid sick leave for employees of certain Federal contractors. See subpart 22.21 and the clause at 52.222-62, Paid Sick Leave under Executive Order 13706.

[81 FR 91631, Dec. 16, 2016]
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule  contains summary financial  information  extracted from Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 1997 for May Drilling Partnership  1983-1 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such Form 10-K.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000711308
<NAME>                        May Drilling Partnership 1983-1
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000         
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   Dec-31-1997
<CASH>                                         163
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  71
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               234
<PP&E>                                         7,315
<DEPRECIATION>                                 7,100
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 449
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          20
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     429
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   449
<SALES>                                        281
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               288
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  150
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                138
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            138
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   138
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  14.43
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  14.43
        



</TABLE>
215.407-3 Forward pricing rate agreements. ( b ) ( i ) Use forward pricing rate agreement (FPRA) rates when such rates are available, unless waived on a case-by-case basis by the head of the contracting activity.
( ii ) Advise the ACO of each case waived.
( iii ) Contact the ACO for questions on FPRAs or recommended rates.
The Hillsborough County Public Schools (District) voluntarily submitted a Resolution Agreement to resolve a Title IX compliance review that OCR initiated to investigate whether the  District had a designated Title IX Coordinator who is trained to coordinate the investigation of complaints; whether the District provided students and employees with contact information for the Coordinator; and whether the  District had nondiscrimination policies and procedures as required by Title IX.   When fully implemented, the Agreement will ensure that the District will have Title IX grievance procedures and a notice of nondiscrimination.  The District will also develop a description of Title IX responsibilities and corresponding training requirements for its Title IX Coordinator(s) and initiate annual training for the Coordinator(s).   In addition, the District will revise its online sexual harassment training and develop a system for maintaining records of all complaints of  sexual harassment at the District’s Schools.   Further, the District will establish a committee of student leaders and  District staff to identify strategies to ensure that students understand their  rights under Title IX.  The District will  also provide a summary of students’ Title IX rights during all new student  orientations, and will utilize annual climate surveys to assess the  effectiveness of steps taken pursuant to the Resolution Agreement.  In addition, the District will conduct a retroactive review of its sexual harassment investigative records for the last  two school years to ensure that Title IX investigative standards were followed.  Lastly, the District will expunge a  disciplinary record for a student who was improperly disciplined in connection with a report of suspected sexual harassment of another student.  OCR will monitor this Agreement until its terms are fulfilled.

***Read    the Resolution Letter***PDF (184K)    | ***Read the Resolution Agreement***PDF (283K)

 

Top