alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 16 (Wednesday, January 27, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 7299]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-01707]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; NIAID Trial Planning Grant (R34 
Clinical Trials Not Allowed), NIAID Clinical Trial Implementation 
Cooperative Agreement (U01 Clinical Trial Required).
    Date: February 12, 2021.
    Time: 10:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, 
National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3G41, 
Rockville, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Kelly L. Hudspeth, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural 
Activities, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, 
National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3G41, 
Rockville, MD 20852, 240-669-5067, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#caa1afa6a6b3e4a2bfaeb9baafbea28aa4a3a2e4ada5bc"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e8838d848491c6809d8c9b988d9c80a8868180c68f879e">[email protected]</span></a>.

    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 21, 2021.
Melanie J. Pantoja,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2021-01707 Filed 1-26-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### In the Matter of Jambaru Realty Corp., Respondent, v. Hortense W. Gabel, as City Rent and Rehabilitation Administrator, Appellant.

Order, entered on December 3, 1962, annulling the determination of the City Rent and Rehabilitation Administration, unanimously reversed, on the law, with $20 *701costs and disbursements to appellant, the determination of respondent-appellant reinstated, and the petition dismissed. The agency found, on the protest proceeding, that “the total rental value of lobby attendant service to each unit is $5.00 per month.” On that basis, it decreased maximum rents on all units by $3, a decrease of $2 for partial loss of that service having been granted in a previous proceeding. The finding was proper, “reduction in rental value” being the established criterion for determining the proper amount of a rent decrease for reason of decreased service (Regulations of the City Rent and Rehabilitation Administration, § 36, subd. b). The opinion in *Matter of Hirsdh*v. *State Bent Comnt,.*(30 A D 2d 35), relied upon by respondent landlord, does not hold that a decrease in rental value may not be uniform for all units. It did hold that the decrease may not be determined by the “saving to the landlord” but must be based on actual reduction in rental value, as the regulations require, however reasonably determined. There are many auxiliary services I'or which it is reasonable to impose uniform charges, and therefore, by parallel reasoning, uniform reduction for elimination of such services. In short, the rental value for every service is not proportionate to space or the base rental value involved, or at least it may be reasonable to so conclude (e.g., air conditioning, refuse collection, refrigerators). The requirement of subdivision b of section 91 of the regulations, that a protest be verified by each tenant joining therein, may be waived by the agency, in light of the power to initiate a proceeding on its own initiative with respect to the maintenance of essential servic.es (Administrative Code of City of New York, § Y41-5.0, subd. h, par. [2]; Regulations, § 82). In any event, it may be that the requirement of separate verification by each protester is not applicable to a “representative” protest, the regulation referring only to a “joint” one (§ 91, subd. 2, *supra).*Concur-— Breitel, J. P., Rabin, Stevens, Steuer and Bergan, JJ.
In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

______________________________

No. 06-11-00264-CR

______________________________

KENDRICK L. MURRY, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

 

On Appeal from the 71st Judicial District Court

Harrison County, Texas

Trial Court No. 06-0298X

 

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Morriss
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Kendrick L. Murry1appellant, has filed with this Court a motion to dismiss his appeal. 

The motion is signed by Murry and by his counsel in compliance with Rule 42.2(a) of the Texas 

Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2(a). As authorized by Rule 42.2, we 

grant the motion. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.

Josh R. Morriss, III

Chief Justice

Date Submitted: May 22, 2012

Date Decided: May 23, 2012

Do Not Publish

 

1We note that the spelling “Murray” is also used in the record, including the judgment; however, it appears that 

Mr. Murry signs his name “Murry.” We will, therefore, use “Murry” in this opinion.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000715273
<NAME> BAY MEADOWS OPERATING COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           4,385
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,261
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (77)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 6,277
<PP&E>                                          10,788
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (6,344)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  11,050
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,251
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            58
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,741
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    11,050
<SALES>                                          1,063
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                20,501
<CGS>                                              329
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   18,638
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,863
<INCOME-TAX>                                       748
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,115
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,115
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .19
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

                In connection with the quarterlyreport of Cascade Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the periodended October 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  The Reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ ROBERT C. WARREN, JR.                                         |   |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
| Robert C. Warren, Jr.

*Chief Executive Officer*December 10, 2004 |   |   |
|                                                              |   |   |
|                                                              |   |   |
| /s/ RICHARD S. ANDERSON                                           |   |   |
| Richard S. Anderson*Chief Financial Office*December 10, 2004      |   |   |

 

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### International Trade Commission

          - [Investigation Nos. 701-TA-657 and 731-TA-1537 (Final)]

# AGENCY:

United States International Trade Commission.

# ACTION:

Correction of notice.

                    Correction is made to the March 24, 2021 deadline for filing posthearing briefs statements, the April 8, 2021 date of record closing, and the April 12, 2021 deadline for filing final comments, in the                     *Written Submissions*                     section of the notice which was published on January 14, 2021 (86 FR 3193). The correct deadline dates are as follows: Filing posthearing briefs and statements is March 23, 2021; the record closing is April 7, 2021; and deadline for final comments is April 9, 2021.                

By order of the Commission.

Issued: January 14, 2021.

Lisa Barton,

Secretary to the Commission.

[FR Doc. 2021-01318 Filed 1-28-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
#### The Manhattan Fire Insurance Company *vs.*Tumlin.

On May 4th attorneys in Atlanta mailed a letter to an attorney in Cuth-. bert, retaining him for the representation of a case which the writers had brought in Randolph superior court. Had the letter been received by due course of mail, the case would have been represented; but it was miscarried, and did not reach its proper destination until May 14th. In the meantime, court met on May 6th, and the case was called and dismissed for want of representation on May 10 th:

*Held,*that this court will not interfere with the discretion of the court below in refusing to re-instate the case. As a general rule parties who transmit papers by mail take the risk of the same being received in time.

Warner, Chief Justice.
Palo Alto Unified School District (CA): In December 2012,  OCR entered into a resolution agreement to resolve an allegation that the  district failed to promptly, appropriately, and effectively respond to reports  of ongoing and widespread harassment of a middle school student with an  intellectual disability. To address these issues, the district agreed to  disseminate a memorandum and give training to district administrators and a  notice to staff, parents, and students regarding the district’s obligation to  ensure a nondiscriminatory environment for students with disabilities; to  revise its middle school handbooks to include disability as a basis that may  give rise to a discrimination complaint; and to provide age-appropriate  training for students regarding disability-based harassment.

Read the Resolution Letter PDF (130K) | Read the Resolution Agreement PDF (107K)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           8,330
<SECURITIES>                                    13,141
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,806
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (7,253)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                25,024
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  25,024
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              113
<BONDS>                                            880
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        64,282
<OTHER-SE>                                    (40,251)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    25,024
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   613
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (1,027)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (99)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (508)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (508)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>
 
                                                                   EXHIBIT  99.2

                         OPINION OF FRIEDMAN & FRIEDMAN,
                   INDEPENDENT AUDITORS FOR ALPNET CANADA INC.



To the Shareholder of
ALPNET Canada Inc.


We have audited the balance sheets of ALPNET Canada Inc. as at December 31, 1997
and 1996 and the statements of earnings, deficit and changes in financial
position for each of the years ended December 31, 1997, 1996 and 1995. These
financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on
our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform an audit to obtain
reasonable assurance as to whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.

In our opinion, these financial statements present fairly, in all material
respects, the financial position of the Company as at December 31, 1997 and
1996 and the results of its operations and the changes in its financial position
for each of the years in the three year period ended December 31, 1997 in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.


\s\ FRIEDMAN & FRIEDMAN
Chartered Accountants

Montreal, Quebec
February 13, 1998
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE:

APPOINTMENTS TO INTERBRANCH COMMISSION FOR GENDER, RACIAL

, AND ETHNIC FAIRNESS :

:

:

:

: NO. 580

JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION DOCKET

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 29 th d ay of November , 20 2 2

, Jon Pushinsky, Esquire, Allegheny

County, and Anna P. Hemingway, Esquire, Dauphin County, are hereby appointed as

members of the Interbranch Commission for Gender, Racial, and Ethnic Fairness for a

term of two years, commencing December 31, 2022

.
#### In the Matter of Mary Cheek, Petitioner, v Joseph J. Christian, as Chairman of the New York City Housing Authority, Respondent.

— Determination of respondent Housing Authority terminating petitioner’s tenancy on the ground of nondesirability, of which review is sought by article 78 proceeding transferred to this court by order of Special Term, Supreme *888Court, New York County, entered April 28, 1978, unanimously modified, on the facts, in the exercise of discretion, to remand to respondent for reconsideration of the penalty imposed, and otherwise confirmed, without costs or disbursements. Respondent’s hearing officer granted credibility to a witness Mrs. Williams and not to petitioner. Whether or not the hearing officer could logically infer from Mrs. Williams’ testimony that petitioner had shot at her, her testimony does substantiate an assault by petitioner on Mrs. Williams, unprovoked by her, while she was a guest at the apartment of one Cooper. Petitioner had long complained to respondent of Cooper’s noise and activities and had requested that she be changed to another apartment. Because it now appears that Cooper, whose conduct may have provoked this incident, has since died of unrelated causes, respondent should review its determination in the light of this change of circumstances. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Markewich, Silverman, Lynch and Yesawich, JJ.
485

APPENDIX D

SEDIMENT CHEMISTRY DATA

Excerpts from the

COMMENCEMENT BAY DAMAGE ASSESSMENT STUDIES

HYLEBOS WATERWAY DATA AND DATA ANALYSIS

REPORT

Reprinted with permission by Commencement Bay Natural

Resource Trustees

Sediment Chemical Analyses (except volatile organic analyses)

conducted by

Northwest Fisheries Science Center
486
487
488

SEDIMENT CHEMISTRY

ERRATUM

There is an error in Tables 3-4 and 3-6, in reporting how the organotin analyses were

conducted. Organotin analsyes were determined by solvent extraction and GC

analysis rather than acid-digestion.
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
SECTION 302 SARBANES OXLEY CERTIFICATION

I, David Duquette, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of New Century
Companies, Inc;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
small business issuer and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Omitted;

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
issuer's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.


April 15, 2005                      /s/ David Duquette
                                   ----------------------------------------
                                   Name:  David Duquette
                                   Title: Chief Executive Officer and
                                          Chief Financial Officer