alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS, EASTERN DIVISION

GERARDO ARANDA, GRANT

BIRCHMEIER, STEPHEN PARKES, and

REGINA STONE, on behalf of themselves and

a class of others similarly situated,

Plaintiffs,

v.

CARIBBEAN CRUISE LINE, INC.,

ECONOMIC STRATEGY GROUP,

ECONOMIC STRATEGY GROUP, INC.,

ECONOMIC STRATEGY, LLC, THE

BERKLEY GROUP, INC., and VACATION

OWNERSHIP MARKETING TOURS, INC.,

Defendants.

Case. No. 12-cv-4069

Hon. Matthew F. Kennelly

FINAL ORDER REGARDING OBJECTIONS TO THE SPECIAL

MASTER’S AWARDS OF CALLS DATED MAY 17, 2019 AND DECEMBER 2, 2019

It is hereby ORDERED THAT:

Pursuant to the Memorandum Opinion and Order dated July 31, 2019 (dkt. 804), as well

as the Memorandum Opinion and Order dated July 22, 2020 (dkt. 846), and the Order dated July

25, 2020 (dkt. 849) , the Court enters the following Final Order on the parties’ objections to the

special master’s Awards of Calls dated May 17, 2019 and December 2, 2019 (together, “special

master’s ruling”) and on Plaintiffs’ Supplemental Motion For Attorney’s Fees:

1

1. The Court sustains the plaintiffs’ objection to the special master’s ruling that the

defendants could successfully rebut the three-call presumption afforded to Option 1 claimants by

1 Unless otherwise noted, defined terms have the same meaning as used in the Court’s

Memorandum Opinion and Order of July 31, 2019.

Case: 1:12-cv-04069 Document #: 867 Filed: 08/04/20 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:51184
2

relying on the Class List as the “factual basis” for their challenge. The settlement administrator

shall award three calls to each of the 43,158 claimants whose claims were challenged on this basis.

2. The Court sustains the defendants’ objections to the use of the List of 97 to increase

the number of calls awarded to Option 2 claimants beyond the number of calls they claimed on

their claim forms. The settlement administrator shall award each Option 2 claimant who falls into

this category credit for the number of calls they claimed on their claim form.

3. The Court vacates the special master’s award of 250 calls to claimant Daisy Exum.

The Court awards Ms. Exum 15 calls.

4. In all other respects, the Court overrules the parties’ objections and sustains the

special master’s rulings.

5. Finally, the Court grants Plaintiffs’ Supplemental Motion for Attorney’s Fees in the

amount of $3,858,119.53.

6. The Court hereby directs entry of this Final Order pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil

Procedure 58 based upon the Court’s finding that there is no just reason for delay of enforcement

or appeal of this Final Order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

ENTERED: August 4, 2020

HONORABLE MATTHEW F. KENNELLY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case: 1:12-cv-04069 Document #: 867 Filed: 08/04/20 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:51185
#### 22.902 Handling complaints.

Agencies shall bring complaints regarding a contractor's compliance with this policy to that contractor's attention (in writing, if appropriate), stating the policy, indicating that the contractor's compliance has been questioned, and requesting that the contractor take any appropriate steps that may be necessary to comply.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

BERTHA MAGALLI YOHO,

Appellant,

v.

JAMES BILLYS and MELISSA BILLYS,

Appellees.

No. 4D22-1540

[April 13, 2023]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, 

Indian River County; Janet C. Croom, Judge; L.T. Case No. 

312021CA000629.

Jonathan Mann and Robin Bresky of Schwartz Sladkus Reich 

Greenberg Atlas LLP, Boca Raton, for appellant.

Eric L. Hostetler and Tiffany Ann Jones of Widerman Malek P.L., 

Melbourne, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

KLINGENSMITH, C.J., DAMOORGIAN and LEVINE, JJ., concur

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### 22.001 Definitions.

*Administrator* or *Administrator, Wage and Hour Division,* as used in this part, means the Administrator, Wage and Hour Division, U.S. Department of Labor, Washington, DC 20210 or an authorized representative.

*Agency labor advisor* means an individual responsible for advising contracting agency officials on Federal contract labor matters.

*e98* means the Department of Labor's approved electronic application (*https://www.sam.gov*), whereby a contracting officer submits pertinent information to the Department of Labor and requests a Service Contract Labor Standards statute wage determination directly from the Wage and Hour Division.

*Service contract* means any Government contract, or subcontract thereunder, the principal purpose of which is to furnish services in the United States through the use of service employees, except as exempted by 41 U.S.C. chapter 67, Service Contract Labor Standards; see 22.1003-3 and 22.1003-4. See 22.1003-5 and 29 CFR 4.130 for a partial list of services covered by the Service Contract Labor Standards statute.

*Service employee* means any person engaged in the performance of a service contract other than any person employed in a bona fide executive, administrative, or professional capacity, as those terms are defined in 29 CFR part 541. The term “service employee” includes all such persons regardless of any contractual relationship that may be alleged to exist between a contractor or subcontractor and such persons.

*Wage Determinations at SAM.gov* means the Government internet website for both Construction Wage Rate Requirements statute and Service Contract Labor Standards statute wage determinations available at *https://www.sam.gov.*

[53 FR 4935, Feb. 18, 1988, as amended at 71 FR 36931, June 28, 2006; 77 FR 75775, Dec. 21, 2012; 79 FR 24202, Apr. 29, 2014; 79 FR 74549, Dec. 15, 2014; 83 FR 42573, Aug. 22, 2018; 86 FR 71325, Dec. 15, 2021]
Publications
- n = number of samples    
- Percent of samples (scat, stomach, etc.) examined that contained the   identified prey. This is not the percentage of that prey in the total diet.   Only species that occurred in quantities equal to or greater than 10% were   included in this table (except salmonids, which were reported at any level).    
- National Marine Fisheries Service/Alaska Fisheries Science Center    
- National Marine Fisheries Service/Southwest Fisheries Science Center 

Table of Contents
19.309 Solicitation provisions and contract clauses. Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 70298 , Aug. 29, 2024.
( a ) ( 1 ) Insert the provision at 52.219-1, Small Business Program Representations, in solicitations exceeding the micro-purchase threshold when the contract is for supplies to be delivered or services to be performed in the United States or its outlying areas, or when the contracting officer has applied this part in accordance with 19.000(b)(1)(ii).
( 2 ) Use the provision with its Alternate I in solicitations issued by DoD, NASA, or the Coast Guard.
( 3 ) Use the provision with its Alternate II in solicitations that will result in a multiple-award contract with more than one NAICS code assigned. This is authorized for solicitations issued after October 1, 2025 (see 19.102(b)).
( b ) When contracting by sealed bidding, insert the provision at 52.219-2, Equal Low Bids, in solicitations when the contract is for supplies to be delivered or services to be performed in the United States or its outlying areas, or when the contracting officer has applied this part in accordance with 19.000(b)(1)(ii).
( c ) ( 1 ) Insert the clause at 52.219-28, Post-Award Small Business Program Rerepresentation, in solicitations and contracts exceeding the micro-purchase threshold when the contract is for supplies to be delivered or services to be performed in the United States or its outlying areas, or when the contracting officer has applied this part in accordance with 19.000(b)(1)(ii).
( 2 ) Use the clause with its Alternate I in solicitations and the resulting multiple-award contracts with more than one NAICS code. This is authorized for solicitations issued after October 1, 2025 (see 19.102(b)).
[64 FR 51832, Sept. 24, 1999, as amended at 67 FR 13066, Mar. 20, 2002; 68 FR 28081, May 22, 2003. Redesignated at 69 FR 25277, May 5, 2004, as amended at 72 FR 36855, July 5, 2007. Redesignated at 76 FR 18309, Apr. 1, 2011; 79 FR 61750, Oct. 14, 2014; 85 FR 11760, Feb. 27, 2020; 87 FR 24843, Apr. 26, 2022; 87 FR 58244, Sept. 23, 2022]
22.1003-3 Statutory exemptions. The Service Contract Labor Standards statute does not apply to— ( a ) Any contract for construction, alteration, or repair of public buildings or public works, including painting and decorating;
( b ) Any work required to be done in accordance with the provisions of 41 U.S.C. chapter 65;
( c ) Any contract for transporting freight or personnel by vessel, aircraft, bus, truck, express, railroad, or oil or gas pipeline where published tariff rates are in effect;
( d ) Any contract for furnishing services by radio, telephone, or cable companies subject to the Communications Act of 1934;
( e ) Any contract for public utility services;
( f ) Any employment contract providing for direct services to a Federal agency by an individual or individuals; or
( g ) Any contract for operating postal contract stations for the U.S. Postal Service.
[54 FR 19816, May 8, 1989, as amended at 79 FR 24206, Apr. 29, 2014; 81 FR 83099, Nov. 18, 2016; 85 FR 27091, May 6, 2020]
#### 1542.1200 Scope of subpart.

This subpart implements FAR subpart 42.12 and provides policies and procedures for executing and processing novation and change-of-name agreements.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, April 20, 2021. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, April 20, 2021 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A21I0162. DIGIRAD IMAGING SOLUTIONS, INC. v. DONNA SHAHEEN KEIFER et al. .
Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: 18C02928
Case: 1:12-cv-03395 Document #: 41-8 Filed: 08/17/12 Page 1 of 35 PageID #:680
Case: 1:12-cv-03395 Document #: 41-8 Filed: 08/17/12 Page 2 of 35 PageID #:681
Case: 1:12-cv-03395 Document #: 41-8 Filed: 08/17/12 Page 3 of 35 PageID #:682
Case: 1:12-cv-03395 Document #: 41-8 Filed: 08/17/12 Page 4 of 35 PageID #:683
Case: 1:12-cv-03395 Document #: 41-8 Filed: 08/17/12 Page 5 of 35 PageID #:684
Case: 1:12-cv-03395 Document #: 41-8 Filed: 08/17/12 Page 6 of 35 PageID #:685
Case: 1:12-cv-03395 Document #: 41-8 Filed: 08/17/12 Page 7 of 35 PageID #:686
Case: 1:12-cv-03395 Document #: 41-8 Filed: 08/17/12 Page 8 of 35 PageID #:687
Case: 1:12-cv-03395 Document #: 41-8 Filed: 08/17/12 Page 9 of 35 PageID #:688
Case: 1:12-cv-03395 Document #: 41-8 Filed: 08/17/12 Page 10 of 35 PageID #:689
Case: 1:12-cv-03395 Document #: 41-8 Filed: 08/17/12 Page 11 of 35 PageID #:690
Case: 1:12-cv-03395 Document #: 41-8 Filed: 08/17/12 Page 12 of 35 PageID #:691
Case: 1:12-cv-03395 Document #: 41-8 Filed: 08/17/12 Page 13 of 35 PageID #:692
Case: 1:12-cv-03395 Document #: 41-8 Filed: 08/17/12 Page 14 of 35 PageID #:693
Case: 1:12-cv-03395 Document #: 41-8 Filed: 08/17/12 Page 15 of 35 PageID #:694
Case: 1:12-cv-03395 Document #: 41-8 Filed: 08/17/12 Page 16 of 35 PageID #:695
Case: 1:12-cv-03395 Document #: 41-8 Filed: 08/17/12 Page 17 of 35 PageID #:696
Case: 1:12-cv-03395 Document #: 41-8 Filed: 08/17/12 Page 18 of 35 PageID #:697
Case: 1:12-cv-03395 Document #: 41-8 Filed: 08/17/12 Page 19 of 35 PageID #:698
Case: 1:12-cv-03395 Document #: 41-8 Filed: 08/17/12 Page 20 of 35 PageID #:699
Case: 1:12-cv-03395 Document #: 41-8 Filed: 08/17/12 Page 21 of 35 PageID #:700
Case: 1:12-cv-03395 Document #: 41-8 Filed: 08/17/12 Page 22 of 35 PageID #:701
Case: 1:12-cv-03395 Document #: 41-8 Filed: 08/17/12 Page 23 of 35 PageID #:702
Case: 1:12-cv-03395 Document #: 41-8 Filed: 08/17/12 Page 24 of 35 PageID #:703
Case: 1:12-cv-03395 Document #: 41-8 Filed: 08/17/12 Page 25 of 35 PageID #:704
Case: 1:12-cv-03395 Document #: 41-8 Filed: 08/17/12 Page 26 of 35 PageID #:705
Case: 1:12-cv-03395 Document #: 41-8 Filed: 08/17/12 Page 27 of 35 PageID #:706
Case: 1:12-cv-03395 Document #: 41-8 Filed: 08/17/12 Page 28 of 35 PageID #:707
Case: 1:12-cv-03395 Document #: 41-8 Filed: 08/17/12 Page 29 of 35 PageID #:708
Case: 1:12-cv-03395 Document #: 41-8 Filed: 08/17/12 Page 30 of 35 PageID #:709
Case: 1:12-cv-03395 Document #: 41-8 Filed: 08/17/12 Page 31 of 35 PageID #:710
Case: 1:12-cv-03395 Document #: 41-8 Filed: 08/17/12 Page 32 of 35 PageID #:711
Case: 1:12-cv-03395 Document #: 41-8 Filed: 08/17/12 Page 33 of 35 PageID #:712
Case: 1:12-cv-03395 Document #: 41-8 Filed: 08/17/12 Page 34 of 35 PageID #:713
Case: 1:12-cv-03395 Document #: 41-8 Filed: 08/17/12 Page 35 of 35 PageID #:714
1401.404 Class deviations. ( a ) The Director, PAM, is authorized to approve class deviations of FAR or DIAR provisions which affect more than one contracting action.
( b ) Requests for deviations under paragraph (a) of this section shall be submitted by the HCA and include justification for the deviation and the number of contracting actions which will be affected.
( c ) For a FAR class deviation the Director, PAM, shall consult with the CAAC, as required in FAR 1.404(a)(1), before authorizing the deviation.
( d ) A copy of each approved class deviation shall be referenced in the contract file.
( e ) Recommended revisions to the FAR and a copy of each approved class FAR deviation shall be transmitted to the FAR Secretariat by the Director, PAM, as required in FAR 1.404.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule  contains summary financial  information  extracted from Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 1998 for May Drilling Partnership  1983-3 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such Form 10-K.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000711310
<NAME>                        May Drilling Partnership 1983-3
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         161
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  146
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               325
<PP&E>                                         1,525
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,850
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,028
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,028
<SALES>                                        767
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               776
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  93
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                463
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            463
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   463
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  20.47
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  20.47
        


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           1,303
<SECURITIES>                                     2,791
<RECEIVABLES>                                   38,491
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,493
<INVENTORY>                                     28,196
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               118,426
<PP&E>                                          50,009
<DEPRECIATION>                                  30,094
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 185,256
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           62,559
<BONDS>                                         58,558
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,663
<OTHER-SE>                                      60,466
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   185,256
<SALES>                                         77,905
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                77,905
<CGS>                                           50,035
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   50,035
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   327
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,979
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (19,718)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (4,268)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (15,450)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   1,963
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (13,487)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.90)<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.90)
<FN>
<F1>For purposes of this exhibit, primary means basic.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000016343
<NAME> CALIFORNIA JOCKEY CLUB
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           1,378
<SECURITIES>                                     6,758
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,378
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 9,514
<PP&E>                                          28,357
<DEPRECIATION>                                (15,691)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  22,180
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              505
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            58
<OTHER-SE>                                      21,617
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    22,180
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,205
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,741
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,464
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,464
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,464
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .25
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 23.1**
**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**
We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8(Nos.: 333-08181, 333-61011, 333-87041, and 333-58742) and the Registration Statement on Form S-3(No. 333-106408) of Maxtor Corporation of our report dated March 10, 2005, except for therestatement described in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements and the matter describedin the penultimate paragraph of Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting asto which the date is May 12, 2005, relating to the financial statements and financial statementschedule, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reportingand the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form10-K.
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
San Jose, California
#### Coley *v.*Dortch & Company.

Him, J.

1. Where the answer to a petition for the recovery of personal property admits that the defendant was in possession of the property sought to be recovered, and that he held it for another and refused to deliver it to petitioner, no proof of conversion is necessary. Civil Code, § 4483.

(a) Nor is it<4ieeessary that the possession be the defendant’s own, but it is sufficient if he holds it as agent of another. *Miller*v. *Wilson,*98 *Ga.*567 (25 S. E. 578, 58 Am. St. R. 319); *Flannery*v. *Harley,*117 *Ga.*483 (2), 486 (43 S. E. 765); *Merchants Co.*v. Moore, 134 *Ga.*482 (52 S. E. 802).

*240January 16, 1913.

Trover. Before Judge Martin. Pulaski superior court. October 2, 1911.

*II. L. Grice,*for plaintiff in error. *II. F. Lawson,*contra. '

2. Where the vendor of personal property took promissory notes therefor, reserving title in himself, which were duly recorded, and such vendor sought to obtain a purchase-money attachment against the vendee in order to recover the balance of the purchase-money due, and afterwards brought an action of trover for the recovery of the property itself against one in possession other than the original vendee, it was not error on the trial of the trover suit for the court to refuse to admit in evidence a certified copy of the purchase-money attachment proceeding, and a certified copy of an order dismissing the levy in that ease. *Jones*v. *Snider,*99 *Ga.*276 (25 S. E. 668); *Cooper*v. *Smith,*125 *Ga.*167 (53 S. E. 1013); *Malsby Machinery Company*v. *Parker,*138 *Ga.*768 (76 S. E. 53).

3. The verdict was supported by the evidence, and the court did not err in denying the motion for a new trial.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*