alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule  contains summary financial  information  extracted from Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 1997 for May Drilling Partnership  1983-3 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such Form 10-K.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000711310
<NAME>                        May Drilling Partnership 1983-3
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000                        
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   Dec-31-1997                  
<CASH>                                         219
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  214
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               433
<PP&E>                                         16,582
<DEPRECIATION>                                 15,963
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,052
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          20
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     1,032
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,052
<SALES>                                        809
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               818
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  288
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                530
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            530
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   530
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  24.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  24.07
        



</TABLE>
209.270-1 Scope. This section— ( a ) Implements— ( 1 ) Section 802 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2004 (Pub. L. 108-136); and
( 2 ) Section 130 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (Pub. L. 109-364); and
( b ) Prescribes policy and procedures for qualification requirements in the procurement of aviation and ship critical safety items and the modification, repair, and overhaul of those items.
[73 FR 1827, Jan. 10, 2008]
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Sheila Davalloo, Appellant.

[833 NYS2d 576]

*560Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Dickerson, J.), rendered April 20, 2004, convicting her of attempted murder in the second degree, assault in the first degree, and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, after a nonjury trial, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, she was not deprived of the effective assistance of counsel *(see People v Berroa,*99 NY2d 134, 138 [2002]; *People v Henry,*95 NY2d 563, 565 [2000]; *People v Benevento,*91 NY2d 708, 712 [1998]). Trial counsel’s determination to pursue a lack of intent defense over an insanity defense was a legitimate trial strategy under the circumstances. Eliciting favorable testimony from the defendant’s husband, who survived the attempt on his life, and expert psychiatric evidence, trial counsel pursued the chosen line of defense capably, forcefully and thoroughly. That the defendant’s trial strategy ultimately proved unsuccessful does not mean that she was not provided with “meaningful representation” *(see People v Berroa, supra; People, v Benevento, supra).*

The sentence imposed was not excessive *(see People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80 [1982]).

The defendant’s contentions that the prosecutor improperly elicited propensity evidence, improperly failed to disclose certain tape recordings *(see*CPL 240.20), and violated her constitutional right to confrontation, are unpreserved for appellate review *(see*CPL 470.05 [2]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Miller, J.P., Spolzino, Ritter and Dillon, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 789 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 789

   To exempt from the Lacey Act and the Lacey Act Amendments of 1981 
 certain water transfers between any of the States of Texas, Arkansas, 
                             and Louisiana.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 30, 2017

    Mr. Cruz (for himself, Mr. Cornyn, Mr. Cotton, and Mr. Boozman) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
               Committee on Environment and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To exempt from the Lacey Act and the Lacey Act Amendments of 1981 
 certain water transfers between any of the States of Texas, Arkansas, 
                             and Louisiana.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Public Water Supply Invasive Species 
Compliance Act of 2017''.

SEC. 2. EXEMPTION OF CERTAIN WATER TRANSFERS FROM THE LACEY ACT AND THE 
              LACEY ACT AMENDMENTS OF 1981.

    (a) Exemption.--Section 42 of title 18, United States Code 
(popularly known as the Lacey Act), and the Lacey Act Amendments of 
1981 (16 U.S.C. 3371 et seq.) shall not apply with respect to any 
covered water transfer, if--
            (1)(A) all prohibited species in the water transferred are 
        located in both of the public water supplies between which the 
        water is transferred; and
            (B) the water is transferred directly between such public 
        water supplies; or
            (2) the water is transferred in a closed conveyance system 
        directly to treatment facilities where all prohibited species 
        contained in the water transferred will be extirpated.
    (b) Definitions.--In this section:
            (1) Covered water transfer.--The term ``covered water 
        transfer'' means a transfer between public water supplies 
        located on, along, or across the State boundaries between any 
        of Texas, Arkansas, and Louisiana, of water containing a 
        prohibited species.
            (2) Prohibited species.--The term ``prohibited species'' 
        means any species--
                    (A) the shipment of which is otherwise prohibited 
                by section 42 of title 18, United States Code; or
                    (B) the transfer of which is otherwise prohibited 
                by the Lacey Act Amendments of 1981 (16 U.S.C. 3371 et 
                seq.).
            (3) Public water supply.--The term ``public water supply'' 
        means any body of water, including any river, lake, or stream, 
        the water of which is available or made available to the 
        public.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 3.5
 CERTIFICATES OF DESIGNATIONS,
PREFERENCES, POWERS AND RIGHTS
OF
SERIES 2006B PREFERRED STOCK
OF
AXCESS INTERNATIONAL INC.
 AXCESS INTERNATIONAL INC. Company
 RESOLVED
 Section 1. Designation and Amount Original Issue Price
 Section 2. Rank Senior Securities Common Stock Junior Securities Parity Securities Distributions
 Section 3. Dividends and Distribution




---



##### 



Section 4. Liquidation Preference
 Liquidation Preference
  Section 5. Conversion Conversion Rights
 Right to Convert
 Mechanics of Conversion
 Reservation of Stock Issuable Upon Conversion




---



##### 



Adjustment to Conversion Price
 Adjustment to Conversion Price Due to Stock Split Dividend, Etc.
 Adjustment Due to Merger, Consolidation, Etc.
 Section 6. Voting
 Section 7. Optional Redemption by Company




---



##### 



Section 8. Mandatory Conversion by Company
 Section 9. Status of Converted or Redeemed Stock
 Section 10. Other Preferred Stock
 Section 11. Lost or Stolen Certificates
 Section 12. Fractional Shares
 Section 13. Preemptive Rights
## JACK BART 98 BYRAM SHOREROAD

GREENWICH, Cf 06830 Email:jackbart36@gmail.com Cell: (203) 921-6400 6/3/2015 US Department ofTransportation, Docket Operations West Building, Ground Floor, RoomW12-140 1200 NewJersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590
RE: Request for Exemption
To WhomIt May Concern, 

### Vm Certified Receipt Mail ;iI ama "person" and hereby request an exemption to 14CFR, FederalAviation Regulation 91.881, Civil subsonicjetairplanes weighing 75,000 pounds orless. This regulation is in regard to stage 3noise compliance. Effective date December 31, 2015. I amtype rated in a Morane SaulnierMS-760 airplane. I fly several ofthese aircraft. I hold a Commercial pilot certificate # 1498832
.. Inthe docket for rule making for this regulatory change, this make and model was excluded fromthe FAA analysis. The docket number is FAA-2013-0503; Arndt. No. 91.328. This make and model airplane has a gross weight of8,750 pounds and thereby is a small aircraft, under 12,500 pounds. This aircraft is a twin enginejet powered airplane. This airplane was certified in the United States July 1958. Type Certificate number 7A3. This airplane is clearly listed in FAAAdvisory Circular 36-3H. change 1, dated 5/25/2012, Estimated Airplane Noise Levels in A-Weighed Decibels. The dataprovided in this ACwas provided by DGAC(French Aviation Authority) as noted in the AC. The noise levels are within the stage 3noise compliance requirements. The operation ofthese aircraft 

### will not be in any conflict with stage 3noise regulations. The FAA Approved Airplane Flight Manual does not contain dataregarding Stage 3 compliance. The present flight manual is dated April1963. This exemption has no effect on safety. This airplane is the first Very Light Jet 

### (VLJ) and has historicalroots. These airplanes operate for personaltransportation oftheir respective owners and also are frequently taken to "Airshows" for display to the general public. This newregulation takes effect December 31,2015. Exemption to this regulation is needed before this date to allowfor recurrent training and normal operations ofthese airplanes in the National Airspace System Summary: AnExemption is hereby granted to JackBart, holder ofcommercialpilot certificate# 1498832, to operate Morane Saulnier MS-760 series aircraft to and fromany suitable airports in the contiguous United States. Thankyou for yourassistance in this matter.
Department of Education - Public Hearing

University of Rhode Island - September 29, 2008

Name Organization

1 Aspinwall, Carolyn East Bay Collaborative

2 Brittingham, Barbara Commission on Institutions of Higher Education of the New England 

Association of Schools and Colleges

3 Buchanan, Matthew J. Community College of Rhode Island

4 Comeau, Ed Campus Firewatch

5 Costa, Ed Rhode Island College

6 Egan, Dan Association of Independent Colleges and Universities of Rhode Island

7 Elliott, Melissa Rhode Island Teachers Association

8 Fayanjuola, Philomena TRIO Programs, Community College of Rhode Island

9 Freedman, Teresa EDFund

10 Hayes, Donald University of Rhode Island

11 Joyce, Michael Rhode Island Higher Education Assistance Authority

12 Klein, Eric Rhode Island Education Opportunity Association

13 Leshan, Tim Brown University

14 Levy, David

15 Loftus, George Ocean State Higher Education Network

16 McGovern, Tim MIT

17 McGuire, Christine Boston University

18 Miller, Megan Rhode Island Teachers Association

19 O'Leary, Eileen National Direct Student Loan Coalition

20 Oure, DeAnne American Speech Language Hearing Association

21 Plummer, Patricia University of Massachusetts

22 Sageby, Jarso Community College of Rhode Island

23 Sciani, Teto Providence College

24 Talbot, Bill Community College of Rhode Island

25 Warner, Jack State Higher Education Executive Officers

26 Wilber, Jill Parent

27 Wilbur, Kyle Graduate, Rhode Island Teachers Association

Office of Postsecondary Education
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 41 Placed on Calendar Senate (PCS)]

<DOC>

                                                        Calendar No. 42
115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 41

  Providing for an exception to the limitation on the appointment of 
       certain persons as the United States Trade Representative.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 25, 2017

   Mr. Hatch, from the Committee on Finance, reported the following 
   original joint resolution; which was read twice and placed on the 
                                calendar

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for an exception to the limitation on the appointment of 
       certain persons as the United States Trade Representative.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXCEPTION TO LIMITATION ON APPOINTMENT OF CERTAIN PERSONS AS 
              UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE.

    (a) In General.--The limitation under section 141(b)(4) of the 
Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2171(b)(4)) shall not apply to the first 
person appointed, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, as 
the United States Trade Representative after the date of the enactment 
of this joint resolution, if that person served as a Deputy United 
States Trade Representative before the date of the enactment of the 
Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.).
    (b) Limited Exception.--This section applies only to the first 
person appointed as United States Trade Representative after the date 
of the enactment of this joint resolution, and to no other person.

                                                        Calendar No. 42

115th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                             S. J. RES. 41

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

  Providing for an exception to the limitation on the appointment of 
       certain persons as the United States Trade Representative.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             April 25, 2017

                 Read twice and placed on the calendar
```
<PAGE>

                                                                 EXHIBIT 10.5(b)



         AGREEMENT made this 27th day of April, 1988, between Southern States
Insurance Exchange, a Virginia reciprocal insurer (the "Reciprocal") and
Southern States Underwriters, Incorporated, a Virginia corporation
("Underwriters");

         In consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements contained
herein the parties agree as follows:

                                   WITNESSETH:

         1. The Reciprocal and Underwriters do hereby agree to a modification of
the Subscribers Agreement and Power of Attorney (the "Agreement") to delete from
the Agreement ARTICLE I. CLASSES OF SUBSCRIBERS; VOTING RIGHTS and replace it
with a new Article I as follows:

         I.       CLASSES OF SUBSCRIBERS; VOTING RIGHTS

         Each Subscriber shall be deemed to be either a Class I Subscriber or a
Class II Subscriber. Each Subscriber which is a cooperative association, as
determined by the Advisory Committee (described in Article IV below), shall be
deemed to be a Class I Subscriber, and all other Subscribers shall be deemed to
be Class II Subscribers. Class I Subscribers shall have the sole power to vote
in the election of the Advisory Committee, the removal by Subscribers of members
of the Advisory Committee, or any other affairs of the Reciprocal which the
Advisory Committee may put to a vote of the Subscribers, and only Class I
Subscribers will be entitled to notice of, or to attend, any annual or special
meeting of the Subscribers. On all matters on which the Class I Subscribers are
entitled to vote, each Class I Subscriber shall be entitled to one vote. Proxy
voting is permitted. There will be no fractional votes.

         2. The Reciprocal is joining with Underwriters to effect this
modification of the Agreement pursuant to the action of the Advisory Committee
of the Reciprocal at its April 26, 1988, meeting mandating the modification
under the authority granted in Article IV 7 (vi) of the Agreement.

         3. The foregoing modification of the Agreement will be communicated by
Underwriters to all subscribers and become a part of each Agreement then in
effect or thereafter entered into effective as of July 1, 1988.

         WITNESSETH the following signatures and seals as of this 27th day of
April, 1988.

                                      SOUTHERN STATES INSURANCE EXCHANGE



                                      BY:  /s/ Gene A. James
                                           -----------------------------------
                                           Chairman of the Advisory Committee
<PAGE>

                                      SOUTHERN STATES UNDERWRITERS, INCORPORATED

                                      BY:  /s/ Gene R. Anderson
                                           -----------------------------------
                                           President
Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A
of the Company for the quarter ended
December 31, 2008 (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and(2)
    
    That the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of
the Company.
 Dated: May 15, 2009
    /s/ Robert J. DavisRobert J. DavisChief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 35 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

<DOC>
115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 35

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
 Providing for the appointment of Michael Govan as a citizen regent of 
          the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That, in accordance with 
section 5581 of the Revised Statutes (20 U.S.C. 43), the vacancy of the 
Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution, in the class other 
than Members of Congress, occurring by reason of the expiration of the 
term of Dr. Shirley Ann Jackson of New York on May 5, 2017, is filled 
by the appointment of Michael Govan of California. The appointment is 
for a term of 6 years, beginning on May 6, 2017, or the date of the 
enactment of this joint resolution, whichever occurs later.

            Passed the Senate March 27, 2017.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
115th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                             S. J. RES. 35

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 Providing for the appointment of Michael Govan as a citizen regent of 
          the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution.
```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Ann Downey, ) 

) 

Plaintiff, )

) 

v. ) No. 12 C 3268

)

Zimmer, Inc., et al, ) Judge Rebecca R. Pallmeyer

) 

)

Defendants. ) 

ORDER

Plaintiff dismisses all claims against all Defendants in this matter without prejudice. 

Each party shall bear their own respective costs and attorneys fees.

ENTER:

Dated: February 11, 2015 _________________________________________

REBECCA R. PALLMEYER

United States District Judge
##     Chief Operating Officer, FSA    

Top

##     Chief Administration Officer
U.S. Dept Commerce/NOAA/NMFS/NWFSC/Publications

Table A-3.Concentrations, ng/g (ppb) wet weight, of chlorinated contaminants in stomach contents of juvenile chinook salmon sampled in 1989. - a,b,c,d,e,g,j 

Footnotes follow 

Table A-3. Continued. Concentrations, ng/g (ppb) wet weight, of chlorinated contaminants in stomach contents of juvenile chinook salmon sampled in 1989. - a,b,c,d,e,g,j 

Footnotes follow 

Table A-3. Continued. Concentrations, ng/g (ppb) wet weight, of chlorinated contaminants in stomach contents of juvenile chinook salmon sampled in 1989. - a,b,c,d,e,g,j 

Footnotes:

a The concentrations of the analytes and the percent recoveries of the surrogate standards were calculated using terachloro-m-xylene as the internal standard.

b Concentrations and initial identifications were determined using gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS) with electron capture detection (ECD).

c The "less than" symbol (<) indicates that the analyte was not detected in concentrations above the stated value. 

d Concentrations less than 10 are rounded to one significant figure; concentrations greater than 10 are rounded to two significant figures.

e Percent recoveries for the internal standards (surrogates) averaged 120%, CV = 8%, n = 27.

f Aldrin coelutes with unknown compound. The concentration would not be higher than stated value.

g Identification of analyte was confirmed by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry.

h The brackets indicate that due to the very small sample size the values should be considered semiquantitative.

i These samples are duplicate analyses. The data for the duplicate samples were somewhat different which implies that the samples were not homogeneous.

j The percent recovery of the surrogate standard was calculated using tetrachloro-m-xylene as the internal standard.

k Standard reference material from the National Institute of Science and Technology.

l RSD is the relative standard deviation which is the standard deviation divided by the mean and expressed as a percent. 

Table of Contents
#### 209.270-5 Contract clause.

The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 252.209-7010, Critical Safety Items, in solicitations and contracts when the acquisition includes one or more items designated by the design control activity as critical safety items.

[76 FR 52139, Aug. 19, 2011]
P ropo s e d P e r m it a nd R e l a te d D o c u me n t s