alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

Kelly, Shaheerah

From: John Waldrop <jwaldrop@co.shasta.ca.us>

Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2014 2:35 PM

To: Kelly, Shaheerah

Subject: RE: SPI Question

Hi Shaheera, 

The existing cogeneration plant at SPI Anderson is a 4 Megawatt unit. 

Let me know if you need any more information. 

Thanks, 

John Waldrop 

Shasta County AQMD 

530-225-5674 

From: Kelly, Shaheerah [mailto:Kelly.Shaheerah@epa.gov] 

Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2014 1:13 PM 

To: John Waldrop 

Subject: SPI Question

John,  

Can you firm the size of the current cogeneration equipment at the SPI facility is 4 MW? Emails from residents in the

area have stated that it is 4 MW but I have not found any documents that officially state this. I would appreciate your

assistance.

Thanks.

************************************ 

Shaheerah Kelly 

Permits Office, Air Division (AIR-3) 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

Phone: 415-947-4156 

Fax: 415-947-3579 

Email: kelly.shaheerah@epa.gov
U.S. Dept Commerce/NOAA/NMFS/NWFSC/PublicationsNOAA Tech Memo NMFS NWFSC-8: Contaminant Exposure in Juvenile Salmon (cont): Figure 9
Table of Contents
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Company's Consolidated Financial 
Statements and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial 
statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                             273
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      631
<ALLOWANCES>                                        65
<INVENTORY>                                        213
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  1415
<PP&E>                                           24075
<DEPRECIATION>                                    4712
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   21802
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             2081
<BONDS>                                           5037
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                        7302
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     21802
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  2161
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     1714
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  73
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    458
<INCOME-TAX>                                       180
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                278
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       278
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0 
        

</TABLE>
23.101 Definitions. As used in this subpart— *Contract action* means any oral or written action that results in the purchase, rent, or lease of supplies or equipment, services, or construction.
*Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)-designated item* means a product that is or can be made with recovered material— ( 1 ) That is listed by EPA in a procurement guideline (40 CFR part 247); and
( 2 ) For which EPA has provided recommended recovered material content levels and other purchasing recommendations in a related Recovered Materials Advisory Notice (RMAN) (available at *https://www.epa.gov/smm/regulatory-background-comprehensive-procurement-guideline-program-cpg#rman*).
*Global warming potential* means how much a given mass of a chemical contributes to global warming over a given time period compared to the same mass of carbon dioxide. Carbon dioxide's global warming potential is defined as 1.0.
*High global warming potential hydrofluorocarbons* means any hydrofluorocarbons in a particular end use for which EPA's Significant New Alternatives Policy (SNAP) program has identified other acceptable alternatives that have lower global warming potential. The SNAP list of alternatives is found at 40 CFR part 82, subpart G, with supplemental tables of alternatives available at *https://www.epa.gov/snap/ .*
*Hydrofluorocarbons* means compounds that only contain hydrogen, fluorine, and carbon.
*Ozone-depleting substance* means any substance the EPA designates in 40 CFR part 82 as— ( 1 ) Class I, including, but not limited to, chlorofluorocarbons, halons, carbon tetrachloride, and methyl chloroform; or
( 2 ) Class II, including, but not limited to, hydrochlorofluorocarbons.
*United States,* as defined in the Executive Office of the President's Office of Management and Budget, Council on Environmental Quality, and Climate Policy Office Memorandum M-22-06, when used in a geographical sense means— ( 1 ) The fifty States;
( 2 ) The District of Columbia;
( 3 ) The commonwealths of Puerto Rico and the Northern Mariana Islands;
( 4 ) The territories of Guam, American Samoa, and the United States Virgin Islands; and
( 5 ) Associated territorial waters and airspace.
*U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA)-designated product category* means a generic grouping of products that are or can be made with biobased materials— ( 1 ) That are listed by USDA in a procurement guideline (7 CFR part 3201, subpart B); and
( 2 ) For which USDA has provided purchasing recommendations (available at *https://www.biopreferred.gov*).
Mark E. McKinnon Mark.McKinnon@dentons.com

D 703.336.8708

Dentons US LLP

1676 Internationa l Drive • Penthouse

McLean, VA 22102

United States

T 703.336.8800

F 703.336.8750 Salans FMC SNR Denton

McKenna Long

dentons.com

July 24, 2015

U.S. Department of Transportation

Docket Management System

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE

Washington, DC 20590

Re: Petition for Third Amendment to Exemption No. 11241 Issued to Phoenix Air

UNMANNED, LLC Pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Refo rm Act (Docket No. FAA

2014

- 0692)

To Whom it May Concern:

Phoenix Air UNMANNED, LLC was issued Exemption No. 11241 on March 26, 2015 (hereinafter

"the Exemption"), allowing operation of UAS for aerial data collection. Th e Exemption was subsequently

ame nded to permit closed set motion picture and television filming. Phoenix Air UNMANNED now

presents this petition seeking an amendment to Exemption 11241 to permit the operation of the Intuit

Aerial Aerigon for both aerial data collection and closed set motion picture and television production

.

If requested, Phoenix Air UNMANNED will submit a revised copy of the UAS Operations Manual

and Closed Set Motion Picture and Television Operations Manual under separate cover pursuant to 14

C.F.R. § 11.35(b), as the materials contain confidential commercial and/or proprietary information that

has not a nd will not share with others. Additionally, the document contains operating conditions and

procedures that are not generally available to the public and are protected from release under the

Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552 et seq. All operation s of the additional UAS will be in full

compliance with the terms of Exemption.

Phoenix Air UNMANNED believes that an amendment adding the Intuit Aerial Aerigon to the

Exemption is in the public's interest as it would reduce hazards and emissions associ ated with alternate

use of manned aircraft to conduct similar aerial data collection. The Intuit Aerial Aerigon has a maximum

take

- off weight of under 55 pounds and has a maximum airspeed of under 30 knots. The aircraft has

advanced safety features such as a lost link fail

- safe mode and an advanced return to home system

Moreover, the FAA has already found that the size, weight, design, and performance

specifications of the Intuit Aerial Aerigon conform to the requirements of Section 333 of the FAA

Moderni zation and Reform Act of 2012. See Exemption 11541A, issued to Vision Pictures, LLC on July

21, 2015. Accordingly, the requested amendment should be granted.July 24, 2015

Page 2 Salans FMC SNR Denton

McKenna Long

dentons.com

As this is an amendment to an existing exemption seeking the addition of a s u pplementary UAS

mod el

, Phoenix Air UNMANNED respectfully submits that good cause exists so that notice does not

need to be published in the Federal Register for the requested amendment.

If you have any questions, or need any additional information to process the requested

a mendment to the Exemption, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned.

Very truly yours,

Mark E. McKinnon

Counsel for Phoenix Air UNMANNED
Evidencia aplicada al tratamiento

Desarrollando alianzas de trabajo con 

los usuarios y las familias para apoyar 

el proceso de recuperación.

Psicoeducación 

familiar

CONTACT INFO 

HERE

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration

Center for Mental Health Services

www.samhsa.gov

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration

Center for Mental Health Services

www.samhsa.gov

Printed 2009 HHS Publication No. SMA-09-4422

Este documento fue producido por la Substance Abuse and Mental Health

Services Administration (SAMHSA), U.S. Department of Health and Human

Services (HHS) bajo los numeros de contrato 280-00-8049 con el Dartmouth 

Psychiatric Research Center y 270-03-6005 con Westat.

(Transformación basada en la información)
¿Por qué participar 

en la FPE?

Los usuarios que participan en la FPE experimentan menos recaídas y pasan menos tiempo 

en el hospital. Las familias que participan 

dicen tener un mayor conocimiento acerca de las 

enfermedades mentales graves y sentirse menos 

estresados, confundidos y aislados. 

¿Qué es

la psicoeducación familiar?

La psicoeducación familiar (FPE, por 

sus siglas en inglés), es una práctica 

basada en la evidencia que le da a los 

usuarios y a las familias información 

acerca de las enfermedades mentales, 

les ayuda a construir apoyos sociales, 

y mejora las habilidades para resolver 

problemas, comunicarse y sobrellevar 

situaciones.

¿Cómo funciona 

la psicoeducación familiar?

La psicoeducación familiar apoya a los usuarios y a sus familias 

en el proceso de recuperación.

n Los usuarios 

definen quién 

es la familia 

Los profesionales que trabajan en 

el IMR ayudan a los usuarios a definir 

la recuperación por sí mismos y a identificar metas de recuperación que les 

sean importantes a nivel personal.

n	 La 

colaboración 

es la clave

La educación acerca de las enfermedades mentales es la base de la toma 

de decisiones informadas.

n La educación 

promueve el 

entendimiento

Los profesionales ayudan a los 

usuarios a crear redes sociales 

e invitan a las personas de apoyo 

a participar en actividades que 

promueven la recuperación. 

n La orientación 

y capacitación 

continuas son 

efectivas

Los usuarios aprenden a identificar 

señales tempranas de alerta y a 

planear los pasos que pueden seguir 

para prevenir las recaídas. 

n El método 

de resolución 

de problemas 

da resultados

Los usuarios aprenden nuevas 

estrategias que les ayudan a manejar 

sus síntomas, sobrellevar el estrés y 

mejorar sus vidas de una manera 

considerable.

n Los grupos 

multifamiliares

mejoran el 

apoyo

El formato de grupos multifamiliares 

permite que los consumidores y las 

familias se relacionen con otros y 

reciban el apoyo de otros usuarios y 

ayuda mutua.
Exhibit 21.1

SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT



|                                                  |  |                                              
|------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------
|Subsidiary name                                   |  | Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization
|AMCC (UK) Limited                                 |  | United Kingdom                               
|AMCC Deutschland GmbH                             |  | Germany                                      
|AMCC Japan Co., Ltd.                              |  | Japan                                        
|Applied Micro Circuits Corporation Canada         |  | Canada                                       
|AMCC Sales Corporation                            |  | Delaware                                     
|AMCC China, Inc.                                  |  | Delaware                                     
|AMCC Enterprise Corporation                       |  | Delaware                                     
|3Ware, Inc.                                       |  | California                                   
|Applied Micro Circuits Corporation (AMCC) Vietnam |  | Vietnam                                      
|Applied Micro Circuits India Private Limited      |  | India                                        
|TPACK A/S                                         |  | Denmark
#### 204.7600 Scope of subpart.

This subpart provides policies and procedures for use of the Supplier Performance Risk System (SPRS) risk assessments in the evaluation of a quotation or offer.
-78.5 -78.0 -77.5 -77.0 -76.5 -76.0 -75.5 -75.0

 38.5

 39.0

 39.5

 40.0

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

08/01

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 01 Aug 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.86 N 77.06 W Meters AGL
p. 1 

# OAR Box 

# 1828 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 237 ) ll-K - (I ) -5 0 Docket Number: 

# A-83-2 7

Printed 11/12/200811:12:56

AM Sheet 237 of 325P. 2 

# 'A \ Pl
H-K-(I)-5 0 INDIVIDUA L ANNUALIZE D NE W INDUSTRIA L BOILE R COSTS , 1985 . EEA , Inc . Marc h12 , 1980 . THI S INFORMATION

CA N B E FOUND I

N DOCKE T A-79-02 , ITE

M II-K-(I)-5 0
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Camco Financial Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Richard C. Baylor, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/Richard C. Baylor
---------------------------------------------
Richard C. Baylor, Chief Executive Officer

August 11, 2003


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
S. J. Res. 60 

One Hundred Fifteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and eighteen 

Joint Resolution 

Providing for the reappointment of Barbara M. Barrett as a citizen regent of 

the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution. 

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the

United States of America in Congress assembled, That, in accordance with section 5581 of the Revised Statutes (20 U.S.C. 43), 

the vacancy on the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution, 

in the class other than Members of Congress, occurring by reason 

of the expiration of the term of Barbara M. Barrett of Arizona 

on January 10, 2019, is filled by the reappointment of the incumbent. The reappointment is for a term of 6 years, beginning on 

the later of January 11, 2019, or the date of the enactment of 

this joint resolution. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Samuel Barnes, Appellant.

Motion by appellant for reconsideration of his motion for assignment of counsel, denied. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Ughetta, Kleinfeld and Pette, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 32 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 32

Disapproving the rule submitted by the Department of Labor relating to 
    savings arrangements established by States for non-governmental 
                               employees.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 6, 2017

  Mr. Hatch (for himself, Mr. Inhofe, Mr. Isakson, Mr. McConnell, Ms. 
   Murkowski, Mr. Perdue, Mr. Roberts, and Mr. Scott) introduced the 
 following joint resolution; which was read twice and referred to the 
                          Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
Disapproving the rule submitted by the Department of Labor relating to 
    savings arrangements established by States for non-governmental 
                               employees.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Department of Labor relating to ``Savings 
Arrangements Established by States for Non-Governmental Employees'' 
(published at 81 Fed. Reg. 59464 (August 30, 2016)), and such rule 
shall have no force or effect.
                                 <all>
```
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>


                                                                    Exhibit 27.1
<ARTICLE>  5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL EXTRACTED FROM THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
OF CAPITAL  TRUST FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<MULTIPLIER>   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                               9,804
<SECURITIES>                                        67,688
<RECEIVABLES>                                      547,232
<ALLOWANCES>                                         1,702
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    13,738
<PP&E>                                                 691
<DEPRECIATION>                                         190
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     637,261
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                8,758
<BONDS>                                            479,448
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               12,268
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            18,229
<OTHER-SE>                                         118,558
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       637,261
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    31,373
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       17,177
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     1,240
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     12,956
<INCOME-TAX>                                         5,259
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  7,697
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                         7,697
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         0.34
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0.25
        


</TABLE>
#### City of Dalton *v.*Wood *et al.*

Pish, C. J.

Wood, as a citizen and taxpayer of the City of Dalton, brought an action against the city and its Water, Light & Gas Commission, consisting of named persons, to enjoin the defendants from further engaging in the business of selling electrical supplies to the inhabitants of the city, installing electrical appliances for them, and generally transacting the business of a private electrician, on the ground that such acts *103were ultra vires. There was no positive and direct evidence submitted in behalf of the plaintiff, on the hearing for an interlocutory injunction, that the city or such commission was engaged, at the time the petition was presented to the judge or for a considerable time prior thereto, in doing the acts sought to be enjoined. The only evidence for the plaintiff on such hearing consisted in the opinions, conclusions, and inferences of witnesses, from given facts, which were not authorized. The evidence for the defendants was positive that neither the city nor any of its officials was engaged in the business complained of, at the time of the presentation of the petition to the judge nor for several weeks prior thereto, and that such business was discontinued by reason of the complaint of the plaintiff. At the time the petition was brought the city electrician, who was not a party defendant, was engaged in ordering electrical supplies from a dealer in such articles, and kept them on hand as city electrician, to be furnished to the citizens of the town who might desire to purchase them. When such articles were purchased by the citizens the price was paid to the city electrician, who deposited the proceeds of such sales in the bank to his credit as city electrician, on which account, as city electrician, he drew checks in favor of the dealer supplying the articles. There was an understanding between the city electrician and the person supplying such articles that the former was not to pay for the same, but was merely to forward to the dealer the proceeds of sales, and such articles as were not purchased by the citizens were to be returned by the city electrician to the seller. There was a further understanding by the city, or the commission, and the seller of such articles, that the city in no event was to be liable for any of the electrical supplies forwarded to the city electrician and purchased from him by the citizens of the town. It was shown to be the duty of the city electrician to supervise all electrical work done in .the city, including inside wiring for private parties as well as that outside for streets, etc., and that for such services and the furnishing of electrical material to the citizens in the manner above stated the city electrician received no more salary than was paid him prior to engaging in such work. *Held,*in view of the evidence, the substance of which is set forth above, that the judge erred in granting an interlocutory injunction.

December 11, 1912.

Injunction. Before Judge Fite. Whitfield superior court. April 10, 1912.

*M. G. Tarver,*for plaintiff in error

*Maddox, McCamy & Shumate,*contra.

■ *Judgment reversed.*

*All the Justices concur.*