alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[110th Congress Public Law 265]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ265.110]

[[Page 122 STAT. 2483]]

Public Law 110-265
110th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
1190 Lorena Road in Lorena, Texas, as the ``Marine Gunnery Sgt. John D. 
   Fry Post Office Building''. <<NOTE: July 15, 2008 -  [H.R. 3721]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. MARINE GUNNERY SGT. JOHN D. FRY POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 1190 Lorena Road in Lorena, Texas, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Marine Gunnery Sgt. John D. Fry Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Marine 
Gunnery Sgt. John D. Fry Post Office Building''.

    Approved July 15, 2008.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 3721:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 154 (2008):
            Apr. 23, considered and passed House.
            June 27, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF BRUNO'S, INC. FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MAY 1, 1999, AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-29-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-01-1999
<CASH>                                          89,356
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   14,498
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (517)
<INVENTORY>                                    159,591
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               283,022
<PP&E>                                         571,963
<DEPRECIATION>                                 310,908
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 585,036
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          106,013
<BONDS>                                        400,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           255
<OTHER-SE>                                    (536,953)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   585,036
<SALES>                                        406,666
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               406,666
<CGS>                                          311,580
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  311,580
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                93,722
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 758
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    606
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                606
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       606
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.02


</TABLE>
#### 1403.101 Standards of conduct.
#### 1830.7001 Facilities capital employed for facilities in use.
Search ED.govAdvanced Search


[Notice  to Readers]

TITLE 28—JUDICIAL  ADMINISTRATION

CHAPTER I—DEPARTMENT  OF JUSTICE

**PART 35 -- NONDISCRIMINATION  ON THE BASIS OF DISABILITY IN STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT SERVICES**

|On September 15, 2010, the U.S.  Department of Justice published a final rule revising the regulations  implementing Titles II and III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA),  and published corrections of typographical errors and one substantive error on  March 11, 2011.  The amendments were effective as of March 15, 2011.   To view the amendments to the Title II regulations, as published in the Federal  Register, please visit http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2010/2010-21821.htm as further amended by http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2011-03-11/html/2011-5580.htm.   For the complete text of the Title II regulations currently in effect, visit http://www.ada.gov/regs2010/titleII_2010/titleII_2010_regulations.htm#title2regs.   For more information on the ADA and its implementing regulations, please visit www.ada.gov.
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EXHIBIT 12

Boeing Capital Corporation and Subsidiaries
Computation of Ratio of Income to Fixed Charges
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                        Years ending December 31,
                                             ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Dollars in millions)                             1999             1998            1997             1996            1995

Income:
         Income before provision for
<S>                                          <C>               <C>            <C>               <C>            <C>
           income taxes                      $      126.7      $      104.6   $       87.8      $       74.9   $       60.3

         Fixed charges                              133.9             130.6          128.2             120.8          105.4
                                             ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Income before provision for
           income taxes and fixed            $      260.6      $      235.2   $      216.0      $      195.7   $      165.7
           charges
                                             =================================================================================

Fixed charges:
         Interest expense                    $      130.0      $      126.7   $      124.7      $      117.3   $      101.9
         Preferred stock cash dividends               3.9               3.9            3.5               3.5            3.5
                                             ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                             $      133.9      $      130.6   $      128.2      $      120.8   $      105.4
                                             =================================================================================

Ratio of income before provision
         for income taxes and fixed
         charges to fixed charges                     1.95              1.80           1.68             1.62            1.57
                                             =================================================================================

</TABLE>
```

                                                     EXHIBIT 32.1

                   Section 1350 Certification
                 By Principal Executive Officer

     I,  Daniel  Greenberg, certify that the periodic report,  to
which  this  Statement  is  attached,  fully  complies  with  the
requirements  of  Section 13(a) or 15(d) of  the  Securities  and
Exchange  Act  of  1934,  and the information  contained  in  the
periodic  report  to  which this Statement  is  attached,  fairly
present,  in  all material respects, the financial condition  and
results of operations of the registrant.

     A  signed  original  of  this  written  statement  has  been
provided  to the Company and will be retained by the Company  and
furnished to the SEC upon request.

     Dated March 24, 2005

                              /s/ Daniel Greenberg
                              Daniel Greenberg
                              Chief Executive Officer
```
Protecting StudentsRace, Color, or National Origin DiscriminationIssues

*In many educational institutions, students of color are disciplined more harshly and more frequently than other students, resulting in serious, negative educational consequences, particularly when such students are excluded from school. Common examples of these disciplinary infractions include, but are not limited to, dress code violations, truancy, defiance, disruption, fighting, profanity, etc. The student discipline policies, procedures, and practices of schools that receive federal financial assistance from the Department of Education must comply with the non-discrimination requirements of Title VI.*

**OCR has continued its vigorous enforcement  activities to ensure that students are not disciplined more frequently or more  severely because of their race, color, or national origin.**

 

----

 

              - Policy Guidance
              - Case Resolutions
              - Publications

### Policy Guidance

 

Please see our Reading Room for a full list of guidance documents on issues related to  Race, Color, or National Origin Discrimination.

### Case Resolutions

- Christian County Public Schools (KY) (03-11-5002)    - Press Release
  - Read the Resolution Letter
  - Read the Resolution Agreement
- **Christina School District (DE) (03-10-5001)**    - Read the Resolution Letter
  - Read the Resolution Agreement 
- **Tupelo Public School District (MS): (06-11-5002)**    -  Read the Press Release
  - Read the Resolution Letter    PDF  (536K)
  - Read the Resolution Agreement    PDF  (260K) 
- More Case Resolutions

To access resolution agreements and letters created on or after October 1, 2013 click 	**here**or enter criteria in the search box below:          Keyword(s): Publications
- Resource on Confronting Racial Discrimination in Student Discipline     PDF  (1.06M)
- En español (Spanish)    PDF  (1.06M) 
- CRDC Data Reports and Presentations  (exclusionary discipline, etc.) 

  Last Modified: 03/05/2024
Test Type Report # Test System Comments Results

Bacterial reverse mutation assay (Ames) DuPont 20711 Bacteria GLP; Guideline The test substance was not mutagenic in the Bacterial Reverse Mutation A

test using Salmonella strains TA98, TA100, TA1535, and TA1537 and E. WP2 uvr A with and without S9 activation.

Completed Studies CAS RN 407-60-3 - submitted with the PMN
# Office for Civil Rights

Goal: To ensure equal access to education for all students through the vigorous enforcement of civil rights.

**Relationship of Program to Volume 1, Department-wide Objectives:**OCR is the principal office within ED that enforces federal civil rights laws.  OCR also supports ED Strategic Plan Goals 1, 2, and 3 by ensuring equal access to education to enable all students to achieve high standards.  By definition, "all students" in the ED Strategic Plan means students from all backgrounds regardless of race, national origin, color, disability, age, or gender.

FY 2000--$71,200,000

FY 2001--$76,000,000 (Requested budget)

**Impact on Students**

Objective 1: To Eliminate Discriminatory Educational Practices Within Schools.
#### 225.7022-3 Prohibition.

Contracting officers shall not award a contract utilizing funds appropriated or otherwise made available for for any fiscal year for any products mined, produced, or manufactured wholly or in part by forced labor from XUAR or from an entity that has used labor from within or transferred from XUAR as part of any forced labor programs, unless an exception applies.

[87 FR 76983, Dec. 16, 2022, as amended at 88 FR 37797, June 9, 2023]
#### 22.1017 [Reserved]
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Mark A. Libratore, the President and Chief Executive Officer of Liberator Medical Holdings, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.             This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and





2.             The information contained in this Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated: August 15, 2011
/s/ Mark A. LibratoreMark A. Libratore,President and Chief Executive Officer
Case: 1:12-cv-01799 Document #: 57 Filed: 04/19/13 Page 1 of 6 PageID #:321
Case: 1:12-cv-01799 Document #: 57 Filed: 04/19/13 Page 2 of 6 PageID #:322
Case: 1:12-cv-01799 Document #: 57 Filed: 04/19/13 Page 3 of 6 PageID #:323
Case: 1:12-cv-01799 Document #: 57 Filed: 04/19/13 Page 4 of 6 PageID #:324
Case: 1:12-cv-01799 Document #: 57 Filed: 04/19/13 Page 5 of 6 PageID #:325
Case: 1:12-cv-01799 Document #: 57 Filed: 04/19/13 Page 6 of 6 PageID #:326
EXHIBIT 99.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the revised annual report of Thunder Mountain Gold, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the period ended December 31, 2001 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robin S. McRae, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and,



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/ Robin S. McRae

-----------------------------------------

Robin  S.  McRae

Secretary/Treasurer and Director and Chief Financial Officer

Date: April 18, 2003
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Dennis Farrell, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, entered November 4, 1976, after a jury trial, which convicted the defendant of two counts of robbery in the second degree (Penal Law, § 160.10) and sentenced him to two concurrent 6- to 12-year terms of imprisonment, unanimously affirmed. As to the point raised with regard to the colloquy between the Justice presiding at the trial and a juror during the polling process, while it might have been preferable, when the possibility of a doubt in the juror’s mind was indicated, to send the jury back into session for a resolution of the doubt, in the totality of the circumstances demonstrated by a reading of the transcript with regard to the jury’s determination and the polling of the jury, there could be no real question with respect to the determination of guilt. We have examined the other points raised and find them without merit. Concur—Kupeferman, J. P., Silverman, Lane and Markewich, JJ.
#### Hendricks *v.*Jackson *et al.*

March 11, 1913.

Petition for injunction. Before Judge Harris. Bibb superior court. July *27,*1912.

' *West & Dasher,*for plaintiff.

*B. E. Hines*and *Byals & Anderson,*for defendants.

Atkinson, J.

1. Under the conflicting evidence in this case, there was no abuse of discretion in refusing to grant the interlocutory injunction for which the plaintiff prayed.

2. In addition to the order denying the interlocutory injunction, the presiding judge filed a separate opinion in which he discussed the law and the evidence and 'the reasons affecting his mind in the refusal of the injunction. These statements did not amount to final adjudications, but merely gave the reasons of the presiding judge; and inasmuch as his judgment was not erroneous, whether or not all of his reasoning was sound, a reversal is not required.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Beelc,*J., *absent. The other Justice's concur.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM BUTLER
MANUFACTURING COMPANY CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE QUARTER
ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998, AND CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF SEPTEMBER 30,
1998, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000015840
<NAME> BUTLER MANUFACTURING COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          26,762
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  135,096
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     75,057
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               278,164
<PP&E>                                         247,244
<DEPRECIATION>                                 149,872
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 425,859
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          177,379
<BONDS>                                         68,097<F1>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        12,623
<OTHER-SE>                                     185,517<F2>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   425,859
<SALES>                                        700,355
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               700,761<F3>
<CGS>                                          582,121
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  582,121
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                91,611<F4>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,288
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 22,741
<INCOME-TAX>                                     9,931
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             12,810
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    12,810
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.68
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.68
<FN>
<F1>REFLECTS LONG-TERM DEBT, LESS CURRENT MATURITIES.
<F2>REFLECTS OTHER STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY BEFORE DEDUCTION OF $36.8 MILLION COST OF
TREASURY STOCK.
<F3>REFLECTS NET SALES PLUS NET INTERNATIONAL JOINT VENTURE INCOME LESS NET OTHER
EXPENSE.
<F4>CONSISTS OF SELLING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSE.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
#### 18.122 Advance payments.

Agencies may authorize advance payments to facilitate the national defense for actions taken under Public Law 85-804 (see Subpart 50.1, Extraordinary Contractual Actions). These advance payments may be made at or after award of sealed bid contracts, as well as negotiated contracts. (See 32.405.)

[71 FR 38248, July 5, 2006. Redesignated at 72 FR 46344, Aug. 17, 2007, as amended at 72 FR 63029, Nov. 7, 2007. Redesignated at 76 FR 18309, Apr. 1, 2011]
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Charles A. Lipinczyk, Appellant.

Motion to prosecute appeal on original papers and for other relief, denied.
IN THE MISSOURI COURT OF APPEALS

HANDDOWN LIST OF OCTOBER 13, 2015

WESTERN DISTRICT

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED PURSUANT TO RULE 84.16(b)

AND ISSUED PER CURIAM

------------------------------------------------------------------

WD78192 DeAnthony Thomas, et al., Individually, and as Representatives of the U.S. Bank

Direct Loans Settlement Class vs. U.S. Bank National Association ND, et al

WD78193 Jack L Beaver and Hilda M. Beaver, et al., Individually, and as Representatives of

all others Similarly Situated vs. U.S. Bank National Association and Wilmington Trust

Company, et al

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED PURSUANT TO RULE 30.25(b)

AND ISSUED PER CURIAM

------------------------------------------------------------------

NONE
#### 2052.211-71 Technical progress report.

As prescribed at 2011.104-70(b), the contracting officer shall insert the following clause in all solicitations and contracts except firm fixed price or indefinite delivery contracts to be awarded on a time-and-materials or labor-hour basis, or which provide for issuance of delivery orders for specific products/serviced line items. The contracting officer may alter this clause prior to issuance of the solicitation or during competition by solicitation amendment. Insignificant changes may also be made by the contracting officer on a case-by-case basis during negotiation without amending the solicitation.

# Technical Progress Report (JAN 1993)

The contractor shall provide a monthly Technical Progress Report to the project officer and the contracting officer. The report is due within 15 calendar days after the end of the report period and must identify the title of the project, the contract number, appropriate financial tracking code specified by the NRC Project Officer, project manager and/or principal investigator, the contract period of performance, and the period covered by the report. Each report must include the following for each discrete task/task order:

(a) A listing of the efforts completed during the period, and milestones reached or, if missed, an explanation provided;

(b) Any problems or delays encountered or anticipated and recommendations for resolution. If the recommended resolution involves a contract modification, e.g., change in work requirements, level of effort (cost) or schedule delay, the contractor shall submit a separate letter to the contracting officer identifying the required change and estimated cost impact;

(c) A summary of progress to date; and

(d) Plans for the next reporting period.

(End of clause)
225.371-5 Contract clauses. ( a ) Use the clause at 252.225-7040, Contractor Personnel Supporting U.S. Armed Forces Deployed Outside the United States, instead of the clause at FAR 52.225-19, Contractor Personnel in a Designated Operational Area or Supporting a Diplomatic or Consular Mission Outside the United States, in solicitations and contracts, including solicitations and contracts using FAR part 12 procedures for the acquisition of commercial products and commercial services, for performance in a designated operational area that authorize contractor personnel (including both contractors authorized to accompany the Force (CAAF) and non-CAAF) to support U.S. Armed Forces deployed outside the United States in— ( 1 ) Contingency operations;
( 2 ) Peace operations consistent with Joint Publication 3-07.3; or
( 3 ) Other military operations or military exercises, when designated by the combatant commander or as directed by the Secretary of Defense.
( b ) For additional guidance on clauses to consider when using the clause at 252.225-7040, see PGI 225.371-5(b).
[80 FR 36901, June 26, 2015, as amended at 80 FR 51753, Aug. 26, 2015; 88 FR 6583, Jan. 31, 2023]