alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                             143
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             280
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      2,705
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           2,261
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             2,295
<LOANS>                                         12,318
<ALLOWANCE>                                         98
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  18,269
<DEPOSITS>                                      14,434
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                514
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            26
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,294
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                   3,320
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                    179
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  242
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    27
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                   987
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                 516
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 516
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                              471
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   3
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                    489
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     22
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                          22
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        21
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .13
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.73
<LOANS-NON>                                         32
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   115
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                   98
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                98
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
217.7002 Policy. DoD policy is to exchange, rather than replace, eligible nonexcess property whenever exchange promotes economical and efficient program accomplishment. Exchange policy, authority, and applicability are governed by— ( a ) The Federal Property Management Regulations issued by the Administrator of the General Services Administration; and
( b ) DoD Manual 4140.01, Volume 9, DoD Supply Chain Materiel Management Procedures: Materiel Programs.
[56 FR 36345, July 31, 1991, as amended at 65 FR 39705, June 27, 2000; 77 FR 23631, Apr. 20, 2012; 82 FR 61480, Dec. 28, 2017]
----

| Name      of Subsidiary                  |   | State      of Incorporation |
|------------------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------|
|                                     |   |                        |
| Colony      Bank of Fitzgerald           |   | Georgia                     |
| Colony      Bank Ashburn                 |   | Georgia                     |
| Colony      Bank of Dodge County         |   | Georgia                     |
| Colony      Bank Worth                   |   | Georgia                     |
| Colony      Bank Wilcox                  |   | Georgia                     |
| Colony      Bank Southeast               |   | Georgia                     |
| Colony      Management Services, Inc.    |   | Georgia                     |
| Colony      Bank Quitman                 |   | Georgia                     |
| Colony      Bankcorp Statutory Trust III |   | Delaware                    |
| Colony      Bankcorp Capital Trust I     |   | Delaware                    |
| Colony      Bankcorp Capital Trust II    |   | Delaware                    |
| Colony      Bankcorp Capital Trust III   |   | Delaware                    |

----
<PAGE>


                                                               EXHIBIT 10(c)

                                  CONSENT OF
                       INDEPENDENT CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS



We consent to the reference to our Firm under the captions "Financial
Statements" and "Experts" and to the use of our reports dated April 15, 2000
with respect to the financial statements of the Canada Life of New York Variable
Annuity Account 2 and the Canada Life Insurance Company of New York included in
the Registration Statement [Form N-4, No. 33-64240] and related Prospectus of
Canada Life of New York Variable Annuity Account 2 [dated May 1, 2000].




                                                    /s/ Ernest & Young LLP
Toronto, Canada,
April 15, 2000.                                      Chartered Accountants
<PAGE>
 
                             E X H I B I T   23.1

               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 33-5404) pertaining to the 1983 Non-Statutory Stock Option Plan and in
the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-06091) pertaining to the 1996
Executive Stock Option Plan of ALPNET, Inc. and subsidiaries of our report dated
March 13, 1998, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of ALPNET,
Inc. and subsidiaries included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year
ended December 31, 1997.



                                                           \s\ ERNST & YOUNG LLP



Salt Lake City, Utah
March 25, 1998
U.S. Department of Education

Negotiated Rulemaking Public Hearing

June 4, 2013

Atlanta, GA

1 Ted Daywalt President, Vet Jobs

2 Dr. Everette J. Freeman President, Albany State University

3 Rodner Wright Vice President of Academic Affairs, Florida A & M University

4 Dr. Gilbert L. Rochon President, Tuskegee University

5 Carlton E. Brown President, Clark Atlanta University

6 Catherine Hurd Dean of Enrollment Services, Johnson C. Smith University

7 Mrs. Akua J. Matherson North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University

8 Dr. Robert Jennings President, Lincoln University

9 Dr. John Wilson President, Morehouse College

10 Chuck Knepfle Director of Financial Aid, Clemson University

11 Eric R. Eaton Assistant Vice President of Finance and Facilities, South Carolina 

State University

12 Dr. David H. Swinton President, Benedict College

13 Dr. Dwaun Warmack Vice President of Enrollment Management & Student Development, 

Bethune-Cookman University

14 Myra R. Woodson Service Employees International Union (SEIU)

15 Deborah Karvey Georgia, Public Policy Chair, American Association of University 

Woman (AAUW)

16 Dr. Beverly D. Tatum President, Spelman College

17 Nia Weston, J.D. Spelman graduate, class of 2010 and recent law school graduate

18 Gregory H. Jones Chairman, American Association of Cosmetology Schools (AACS) 

Government Relations Committee

19 Dr. Jimmy Jenkins Livingstone College

20 Kenneth Allen Student, Bethune-Cookman University

21 Angel Johnson Student, Bethune-Cookman University

22 Joe Steffen Legal & Government Relations, Savannah State

23 Syreeta Monroe Financial Aid Councilor, Savannah State

24 Dr. Ernest McNealey President, Stillman College

25 Johnny Nimes Assistant Director, Financial Aid, Fort Valley State University

26 Mildred Singleton Parent

27 Tom Netting Executive Director, Higher Education Allied Health Leaders Coalition

28 Darryl Jackson Director, Office of Student Financial Aid, Alabama A & M University

29 Annette Jackson Spelman graduate and Executive Director, The Ken Ford Foundation
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Angeles
Income Properties, Ltd. II Year-End 1995 10-KSB and is qualified in it entirety
by reference to such 10-KSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000711642
<NAME> ANGELES INCOME PROPERTIES, LTD. II
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                       1,708,221
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  140,708
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (30,998)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                      34,541,453
<DEPRECIATION>                            (21,284,988)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              16,370,559
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                     16,723,089
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,103,621)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                16,370,559
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,928,861
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             7,375,591
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,776,985
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,417,735
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,417,735
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,417,735
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    14.06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>The Partnership has an unclassified balance sheet.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
#### Southern Cotton Oil Company *et al. v.*Overby *et al.*

January 14, 1913.

Equitable petition. Before Judge Whipple. Crisp superior court. December 22, 1911.

*King & Spalding and Underwood, J. T. Hill,*and *J, W. Dennard,*for plaintiffs in error. *Mav E, Land,*contra,

Fish, C. J.

The evidence submitted on the trial was amply sufficient to authorize a finding that the operation of the cotton ginnery to be erected by the defendants below would prove a nuisance to the plaintiffs. Even if any of the evidence introduced by the plaintiffs was open to the objection of irrelevancy, it was not of such character that its admission required the grant of a new trial. The charge was full and fair, and the exceptions thereto were without merit. There was no abuse of ' discretion in refusing a new trial.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
#### 1330.201 Contract requirements.
**Reports and Studies**

FY 2016 Agency Financial Report  PDF (17.3 MB)

Protection of Human Subjects in Research

Annual Plans and Reports

Semiannual Report On Audit Follow-up No. 69PDF (433 KB)

Semiannual Report On Audit Follow-up No. 68PDF (450 KB)

Semiannual Report On Audit Follow-up No. 67MS WORD (192 KB)

Semiannual Report On Audit Follow-up No. 66MS WORD (192 KB)

Semiannual Report On Audit Follow-up No. 65MS WORD (192 KB)

Semiannual Report On Audit Follow-up No. 64MS WORD (190 KB)

Semiannual Report On Audit Follow-up No. 63PDF (465 KB)

Semiannual Report On Audit Follow-up No. 62MS Word (188 KB)

Semiannual Report On Audit Follow-up No. 61MS Word (175 KB)

Semiannual Report On Audit Follow-up No. 60MS Word (176 KB)

Semiannual Report On Audit Follow-up No. 59MS Word  (198 KB)

Semiannual Report On Audit Follow-up No. 58MS Word  (196 KB)

Semiannual Report On Audit Follow-up No. 57MS Word (194 KB)

Semiannual Report On Audit Follow-up No. 56MS Word (193 KB)

Semiannual Report On Audit Follow-up No. 55MS Word (199 KB)

FY 2008 Buy American Act Report    PDF (525 KB)

FY 2011 Buy American Act Report   PDF (15.4 KB)

FY 2012 Buy American Act Report   PDF (19.7 KB)

FY 2013 Buy American Act Report   PDF (19.4 KB)

Archived Financial Management Reports

**Budget**

ED's Budget 

Top
#### PEOPLE ex rel. COOK v. PITTS, Sheriff.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

January 19, 1906.)

Criminal Law—Certificate of Conviction—Compliance with Statutory Form.

The words, “having thereupon pleaded guilty, it is adjudged,” etc., in a certificate of conviction, substantially comply with the words, “having been thereupon convicted upon a plea of guilty, it is adjudged,” etc., contained in Code Cr. Proc. §§ 721, 722, prescribing a form of certificate of conviction, and the certificate, otherwise in statutory form, is sufficient.

Appeal from Special Term, Albany County.

Proceedings by the people, on the relation of Rudolph Cook, for a writ of habeas corpus, against Sebastian W. Pitts, as sheriff of Albany county. From an order discharging relator from imprisonment, defendant appeals.

Reversed.

Argued before PARKER, P. J., and SMITH, CHESTER, KELLOGG, and COCHRANE, JJ.

George Addington, Dist. Atty. (Robert H. McCormic, Asst. Dist. Atty., of counsel), for appellant.

Edward J. Brennan (Mark Cohn, of counsel), for respondent.

JOHN M. KELLOGG, J.

This case is governed by the rule in People ex rel. Bidwell v. Pitts, as Sheriff, etc. (decided at this term of court) 97.N. Y. Supp. 509. The certificate uses the words, “having thereupon pleaded guilty, it is adjudged,” etc., while the statutory form (Code of Criminal Procedure, §§ 721, 722) uses the words, “having been thereupon convicted upon a plea of guilty, it is adjudged,” etc., but it has been held this is a substantial compliance with the statutory form, as upon a plea of guilty the only duty of the court is to sentence. People ex rel. Evans v. McEwen, 67 How. Prac. 105, 113.

The order appealed from is therefore reversed, the writ of habeas corpus quashed, and the relator remanded to the custody of said sheriff, as custodian of said penitentiary, to serve the balance of his term. All concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 26 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.Con.Res.26
                                      Agreed to October 25, 2017        

                     One Hundred Fifteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
          the third day of January, two thousand and seventeen

                          Concurrent Resolution

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring),

SECTION 1. USE OF EMANCIPATION HALL FOR UNVEILING OF AMERICAN PRISONERS 
              OF WAR/MISSING IN ACTION (POW/MIA) CHAIR OF HONOR.

    (a) Authorization.--Emancipation Hall in the Capitol Visitor Center 
is authorized to be used for an event on November 8, 2017, to unveil 
the American Prisoners of War/Missing in Action (POW/MIA) Chair of 
Honor.
    (b) Preparations.--Physical preparations for the conduct of the 
ceremony described in subsection (a) shall be carried out in accordance 
with such conditions as may be prescribed by the Architect of the 
Capitol.
Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.
Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.
```
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Joan M. Clark, Appellant v General Electric Corporation et al., Respondents. Workers’ Compensation Board, Respondent.

Appeals from decisions of the Workers' Compensation Board, filed July 11, 1977 and October 4, 1977. The record is devoid of any proof of when notice of the decision was given to the claimant as is required by section 23 of the Workers’ Compensation Law. For that reason, the decision of the board is not supported by substantial evidence and should be reversed *(Matter of Sicker v Spencer & Son Corp.,*30 AD2d 886, mot for lv to app den 22 NY2d 645). If it were necessary to reach the question of mailing, it should be observed that the Form C-67 used by the board as a "notice of decision” specifically states in a paragraph or footnote numbered "2” as follows: "2. You have the right to appeal this decision within 30 days from the date of this notice by *writing*to the Board at its nearest office stating the grounds for your appeal and requesting a review of the decision.” (Emphasis added.) Not only does the "notice” misstate the beginning of the time to appeal as set forth in section 23 of the Workers’ Compensation Law, it specifically authorizes writing as a permissible way to perfect an appeal without any statement as to "filing” the appeal. In this particular case, the board might be estopped from relying upon its regulation or rule (12 NYCRR 300.13) since its "notice” is not in conformity therewith. However, it is unnecessary to fully consider the issue as to when notice is given, what effect, if any, mailing has on the time limitation of section 23 of the Workers’ Compensation Law, and whether or not a notice of appeal from a referee’s decision must be physically filed within 30 days from notice. Decision reversed, with costs, and matter remitted for further proceedings not inconsistent herewith. Mahoney, P. J., Sweeney, Larkin, Mikoll and Herlihy, JJ., concur.
1516.303-75 Amount of cost-sharing. ( a ) Contractors should contribute a reasonable amount of the total project cost covered under the contract. The ratio of cost participation should correlate to the apparent advantages available to performers and the proximity of implementing commercialization, i.e., the higher the potential for future profits, the higher the contractor's share should be.
( b ) Fee will not be paid to the contractor or any member of the contractor team (subcontractors and consultants) which has a substantial and direct interest in the contract, or is in a position to gain long term benefits from the contract. A vulnerability the Contracting Officer should consider in reviewing a prime contractor's request for consent to subcontract is whether subcontractors under prime cost-sharing contracts have a significant direct interest in the contract to gain long-term benefits from the contract.
( c ) The Contracting Officer, with the input of technical experts, may consider the following factors in determining reasonable levels of cost sharing: ( 1 ) The availability of the technology to competitors;
( 2 ) Improvements in the contractor's market share position;
( 3 ) The time and risk necessary to achieve success;
( 4 ) If the results of the project involve patent rights which could be sold or licensed;
( 5 ) If the contractor has non-Federal sources of funds to include as cost participation; and
( 6 ) If the contractor has the production and other capabilities to capitalize the results of the project.
( d ) A contractor's cost participation can be provided by other subcontractors with which it has contractual arrangements to perform the contract as long as the contractor's cost-sharing goal is met.
[61 FR 14505, Apr. 2, 1996]
----

----

----

----

----

----

| PURCHASER:                                                                   |   | PHOTOMEDEX, INC. |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|------------------|
|                                                                         |   |             |   |
|                                                                         |   |             |   |
|   /s/ Dennis M. McGrath         |   |             | By:  /s/ Richard J. DePiano                          |
|                                                                         |   |             |   |
| Name: Dennis M. McGrath                                                 |   |             | Name: Richard J. DePianoTitle: Chairman of the Board of Directors |

----

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 1995 for May Drilling Partnership 1983-3 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such Form 10-K.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000711310
<NAME> MAY DRILLING PARTNERSHIP 1983-3
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                             153
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      189
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   342
<PP&E>                                          16,509
<DEPRECIATION>                                  15,741
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,110
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               26
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,084
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,110
<SALES>                                            619
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   628
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      128
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   245
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    255
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                255
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       255
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    10.32
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    10.32
        

</TABLE>