alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
On November 13, 2014, the Minneapolis Public Schools (District) entered into a voluntary Agreement to resolve a Title VI compliance review that OCR initiated regarding the equitable discipline of students.  According to the Agreement, the District will make revisions to its discipline polices and procedures; designate  employees to serve as the District’s Discipline Supervisor and complaint coordinator; consult with and, as necessary, retain an expert to assess and make recommendations to address the root causes on the racial disparity in discipline in the District; establish a District-wide discipline team to review the disciplinary actions taken at each school on an ongoing basis to ensure that the actions are non-discriminatory and consistent with the District’s discipline policies and procedures; conduct an annual review of data collected regarding disciplinary referrals and sanctions at each school and by each teacher; ensure that except in emergency situations, school staff employ a range of corrective measures before referring a student to disciplinary authorities; provide a system of supports to assist students who display behavior problems; provide annual training programs on discipline to District personnel and students and informational programs for parents and guardians; review and revise its policy on involuntary administrative transfers and its School Resource Officer program to ensure their effectiveness in furthering the goals of the agreement, and provide annual training to all School Resource Officers; administer annually a comprehensive climate survey to students, teachers/staff, and parents at all District schools to measure the perceptions of students and other members of the community in connection with the administration of school discipline, and following OCR review and approval, take steps to address concerns raised by the survey results; establish uniform standards for the content of student discipline files at all District schools; and develop a means to convey to the public data on the use of discipline.

***Read the Press Release | Read the Resolution Letter PDF**(271K)**|******Read Resolution Agreement PDF**(278K)**.***

  

Top
Appeal No. 1851.

#### Joseph V. Andreozzi *v.*Frank D’Antuono *d/b/a*Ideal Market.

*D. A. St. Angelo,*for appellant. *Vincent J. Baccari,*for appellee.

Motion of employee for a counsel fee is deferred pending the Workmen’s Compensation Commission’s determination of his petition for compensation. See *Andreozzi*v. *D’Antuono,*113 R. I. 155, 319 A.2d 16 (1974).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SUMMARY CONTAINS FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS OF BRIDGFORD FOODS CORPORATION FOR THE THIRTY-NINE WEEKS ENDED JULY
28, 2000, AS SET FORTH IN THIS 10-Q FOR SUCH PERIOD, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-03-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-28-2000
<CASH>                                      18,099,822
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               13,114,230
<ALLOWANCES>                                   626,643
<INVENTORY>                                 16,668,806
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            50,181,171
<PP&E>                                      51,844,291
<DEPRECIATION>                              33,282,477
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              78,904,223
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       11,063,224
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    10,759,695
<OTHER-SE>                                  45,069,463
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                78,904,223
<SALES>                                    113,436,187
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           113,436,187
<CGS>                                       68,316,206
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               68,316,206
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            34,574,451
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               134,063
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             235,539
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             10,545,530
<INCOME-TAX>                                 4,007,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          6,538,530
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 6,538,530
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.59
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.58


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 7 (Tuesday, January 12, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 2416]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-00523]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Government in the Sunshine Act; Meeting Notice

AGENCY: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.

Time and Date: 10 a.m., Friday, January 15, 2021.

Place: Virtual Meeting via Video/Audio Conference.

Status:  Closed.

Matter(s) to be Considered: 1. Personnel Matter.

FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT:  Michelle Smith, Director, Division of 
Board Members at 202-452-2955.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: You may access the Board's website at 
www.federalreserve.gov for an electronic announcement.

    Dated: January 8, 2021.
Ann Misback,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2021-00523 Filed 1-8-21; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
FDMS Docket Number: FAA-2012-1224

 Contacts. With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed? 

Organization Person Contacted Date Response 

National Business Aircraft Association Eli Cotti 6/11/12

Regional Airline Association 6/11/12

Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association Robert Hackman 6/11/12

ATA M Lopez 6/11/12
#### 239.7408 Special construction.
- Home
      - About
      - People
      - Programs
      - Funding
      - Policy
      - Products 
      - Resources
      - Contact

### **NOTICE: The U.S. Department of Education is transitioning to a new email and newsletter distribution service in 2024. Updates will be posted when available.**

# Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services Email Bulletins

OSERS' Office of the Assistant Secretary sends email blasts as needed to its listserv subscribers.  Updates include news and information regarding department programs, services and activities related to special education and rehabilitative services.

----

# Office of Special Education Programs

## *OSEP Update* Newsletter 

The *OSEP Update* newsletter provides semi-monthly email blasts with important OSEP announcements as well as a monthly newsletter with updates for OSEP stakeholders.  The newsletter has reoccurring sections that outline the most timely and crucial work of OSEP, especially stakeholder resources.  OSEP updates this listerv regularly to include Part B, Part C, and Part D Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) grantees and stakeholders, and OSEP staff.

## *Early Learning at ED* Newsletter 

The *Early Learning at Ed* newsletter provides monthly updates from the department to early learning stakeholders.  The monthly newsletter includes the most relevant updates from the Department, it's grantees, its federal partners, and (usually federally funded) early learning research.  Subscribers of this listserv may occasionally receive email blasts regarding important or timely early learning releases or happenings.

----

# Rehabilitation Services Administration 

## Updates and Listservs

RSA maintains  listserv lists that communicate directly with grantees and stakeholders in the  vocational rehabilitation community. Individuals on these lists receive  information about program announcements and policy guidance as well as  newsletters and general communications specific to their grant program.

## *New From NCRTM* Newsletter

In addition to RSA's subscription lists, RSA contractor, National Clearinghouse of Rehabilitation Training Materials (NCRTM), produces a monthly electronic newsletter, *New From NCRTM*, devoted to delivering technical assistance that is disseminated to the vocational rehabilitation field. *New From MCRTM* is disseminated monthly to all of RSA's listserv and subscription lists. 
      - Sign up for the *New From NCRTM* newsletter.          - View archived *New From NCRTM* newsletters . 

### OSERS Navigation

About OSERS | People and Offices | Programs and ProjectsGrants and Funding | Legislation and PolicyPublications, Products, Research and StatisticsAdditional Resources | Contact and Feedback
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

EASTERN DIVISION

KIM PINDAK, et al., )

)

) No. 12 C 4005

Plaintiffs, ) Judge Kennelly

v. ) Magistrate Judge Nolan

)

CITY OF CHICAGO, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

NOTICE OF MOTION

To: City of Chicago

121 N. LaSalle Street, Rm. 107

Chicago, Illinois 60602

Please take notice that on Thursday, June 7, 2012, at 9:30 a.m., or as soon 

thereafter as counsel may be heard, I will appear before Judge Matthew F. Kennelly, in 

courtroom 2103 of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern 

Division, 219 S. Dearborn Street, Chicago, Illinois 60604, and there and the present the 

attached Motion for a Preliminary Injunction and Motion for Leave to File Instanter

a Brief in Excess of 15 Pages in Support of Plaintiffs’ Motion for a Preliminary 

Injunction.

/s/ Adele D. Nicholas

Counsel for Plaintiffs

Adele D. Nicholas

4510 N. Paulina Street, 3E

Chicago, Illinois 60640

(847) 361-3869

Case: 1:12-cv-04005 Document #: 9 Filed: 06/01/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:61
217.500 Scope of subpart. ( a ) Unless more specific statutory authority exists, the procedures in FAR subpart 17.5 and this subpart apply to all purchases, except micro-purchases, made for DoD by another agency. This includes orders under a task or delivery order contract entered into by the other agency. (Pub. L. 105-261, Section 814.)
( b ) A contracting activity from one DoD Component may provide acquisition assistance to deployed DoD units or personnel from another DoD Component. See PGI 217.502-1 for guidance and procedures.
[64 FR 14400, Mar. 25, 1999, as amended at 76 FR 76319, Dec. 7, 2011; 80 FR 36718, June 26, 2015; 80 FR 74695, Nov. 30, 2015]
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted), Stephen Smith, Chief
Financial Officer of Applied Micro Circuits Corporation (the Company), hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



|1. |  | The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, and
|-- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) or its staff upon request.



This certification accompanies the Form 10-K to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference into any
filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Annual Report), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such
filing.



|                      |  |                                          
|--------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------
|Dated:  June 10, 2004 |  | /s/    STEPHEN M. SMITH                  
|                      |  | Stephen M. Smith, Chief Financial Officer
**EXHIBIT      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The                information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Registrant. |
|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated                this 27th                day of March, 2008 | By:    | /s/                Xiao Ping Zhang   |
|------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------|
|                                                             |   | Xiao              Ping Zhang         |
|                                                             |   | Chief              Executive Officer |
|                                                             |   |                                 |
|                                                             |   |                                 |

----
232.070 Responsibilities. ( a ) The Principal Director, Defense Pricing, Contracting, and Acquisition Policy (DPCAP), Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (Acquisition and Sustainment) (OUSD(A&S)DPCAP) is responsible for ensuring uniform administration of DoD contract financing, including DoD contract financing policies and important related procedures. Agency discretion under FAR part 32 is at the DoD level and is not delegated to the departments and agencies. Proposals by the departments and agencies, to exercise agency discretion, shall be submitted to OUSD(A&S)DPCAP.
( b ) Departments and agencies are responsible for their day-to-day contract financing operations. Refer specific cases involving financing policy or important procedural issues to OUSD(A&S)DPCAP for consideration through the department/agency Contract Finance Committee members (also see subpart 201.4 for deviation request and approval procedures).
( c ) See PGI 232.070(c) for information on department/agency contract financing offices.
[63 FR 11535, Mar. 9, 1998, as amended at 65 FR 39705, June 27, 2000; 68 FR 7440, Feb. 14, 2003; 70 FR 75412, Dec. 20, 2005; 72 FR 20765, Apr. 26, 2007; 88 FR 73237, Oct. 25, 2023; 89 FR 60832, July 29, 2024]
400 MARYLAND AVE., S.W. WASHINGTON, D.C. 20202-2600

www.ed.gov

The Department of Education’s mission is to promote student achievement and preparedness for global competiveness by 

fostering educational excellence and ensuring equal access.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES

MAY 6, 2019 

Honorable Lamont Repollet

Commissioner of Education 

New Jersey Department of Education

100 Riverview Plaza 

P.O. Box 500, Route 29 

Trenton, New Jersey 08625-0500 

Dear Commissioner Repollet: 

This letter is to inform you of the results of the Office of Special Education Programs’ (OSEP’s) 

on-site visit to the New Jersey Department of Education (NJDOE) on September 20–21, 2018. 

OSEP appreciates the cooperation and assistance provided by the NJDOE staff. As indicated in 

our letter to you dated August 27, 2018, the visit focused on a review of the State’s dispute 

resolution system.

Specifically, during the on-site visit, OSEP conducted interviews with the NJDOE staff and 

reviewed documentation related to NJDOE’s Due Process complaint and Hearing Procedures. 

This report does not address NJDOE’s mediation or Part B State complaint procedures or the 

State’s implementation of those procedures, and OSEP expresses no view as to whether the 

State’s procedures for those dispute resolution mechanisms comply with applicable Part B 

requirements. OSEP found noncompliance specifically related to the State’s policies and 

procedures pertaining to: 1) due process hearings; 2) resolution meetings; 3) expedited due 

process hearings; and 4) a child’s status during proceedings therefore requiring corrective action. 

See Enclosure.

The Enclosure to this letter does not include a description of the State’s dispute resolution system 

because this information is available on the State’s Web site and public documents. The 

Enclosure does contain OSEP’s analysis of the documents and information provided by the State, 

findings of noncompliance identified during the visit, and required actions. 

We look forward to collaborating with the NJDOE to improve results and compliance for 

children and youth with disabilities and their families. If you have any questions or wish to 

request technical assistance, please do not hesitate to call your OSEP State Lead, Dwight 

Thomas, at 202-245-6238 or by email Dwight.Thomas@ed.gov. 

Sincerely,

/s/

Laurie VanderPloeg

Director

Office of Special Education Programs
#### 237.109 Services of quasi-military armed forces.

See 237.102-70b for prohibition on contracting for firefighting or security-guard functions.

[60 FR 61599, Nov. 30, 1995]
#### 233.204-70 Limitations on payment.

See 10 U.S.C. 3862 for limitations on Congressionally directed payment of a claim under 41 U.S.C. chapter 71 (Contract Disputes), a request for equitable adjustment to contract terms, or a request for relief under Public Law 85-804.

[63 FR 11537, Mar. 9, 1998, as amended at 77 FR 35881, June 15, 2012; 87 FR 76995, Dec. 16, 2022]
#### Helen A. Hartigan, Respondent, v. John P. Hartigan, Appellant.

Order, entered on October 14, 1960, so far as appealed from, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Concur — Valente, J. P., McNally, Stevens, Steuer and Bastow, JJ.
19.202-2 Locating small business sources. The contracting officer shall, to the extent practicable, encourage maximum participation by small business, veteran-owned small business, service-disabled veteran-owned small business, HUBZone small business, small disadvantaged business, and women-owned small business concerns in acquisitions by taking the following actions: ( a ) Before issuing solicitations, make every reasonable effort to find additional small business concerns (see 10.002(b)(2)). This effort should include contacting the agency small business specialist and SBA PCR (or, if a PCR is not assigned, see 19.402(a)).
( b ) Publicize solicitations and contract awards through the Governmentwide point of entry (see subparts 5.2 and 5.3).
[48 FR 42240, Sept. 19, 1983, as amended at 63 FR 70268, Dec. 18, 1998; 65 FR 60544, Oct. 11, 2000; 66 FR 27413, May 16, 2001; 68 FR 43856, July 24, 2003; 71 FR 36925, June 28, 2006; 85 FR 11759, Feb. 27, 2020]
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Thomas Guest, Appellant, v. Western Gateway Roofing Metal Works et al., Respondents. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

Appeal by the claimant from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Board holding that the case should be scheduled rather than decided on a permanent partial disability and since claimant had received benefits in excess of the schedules the ease was closed. On January 31, 1955 claimant, a roofer, suffered injuries to both legs when he fell from a hangar roof. On April 29, 1957 the following Referee’s decision was handed down: “This is not a case to be decided by schedule. Award December 28, 1956 to date as $36.00. 75% partial disability tentative. Continued with compensation same rate to early calendar. Question of permanent disability.” The question of permanent disability was not, however, considered again, despite intervening hearings, until September 28, 1960 when a different Referee made schedule awards and closed the ease. Subsequently the board affirmed and the instant appeal followed. Claimant asserts that the board had no authority to affirm the reversal of the prior Referee who found the case was not to be scheduled, We cannot agree. It is sufficient *919to point out here that the board could properly find that since the decision of April 29, 1957 did not determine the question of permanency, it was not a final determination as to whether the award should be scheduled or based on permanent partial disability and therefore that it and the intermediate awards prior to September 29, 1960 were simply interlocutory in nature. This being so the Referee and the board properly had before them as a question of fact the nature of the award. We find no reason to disturb the board’s resolution of this issue. Decision affirmed, without costs. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds, Taylor and Hamm, JJ., concur.
#### 1452.226-70--1452.226-71 [Reserved]
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1



                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
Nos. 33-31298, 33-85020 and 333-39499 of Silicon Valley Group, Inc. on Forms 
S-8 of our reports dated October 26, 1998 appearing in and incorporated by 
reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Silicon Valley Group, Inc. for 
the year ended September 30, 1998.


/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
-------------------------
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

San Jose, California
December 29, 1998
**Commonwealths and Territories**

- American Samoa
- Federated States of Micronesia
- Guam
- Northern Mariana Islands
- Puerto Rico
- Republic of Palau
- Republic of the Marshall Islands
- Virgin Islands

**Freely Associated States**

- Federated States of Micronesia
- Republic of Palau
- Republic of the Marshall Islands
#### 211.201 Identification and availability of specifications.

Follow the procedures at PGI 211.201 for obtaining specifications, standards, and data item descriptions from the ASSIST database, including DoD adoption notices on voluntary consensus standards.

[84 FR 4368, Feb. 15, 2019]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

219 SOUTH DEARBORN STREET 

CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60604

NOTIFICATION OF CHANGE OF ATTORNEY ADDRESS OR NAME

1. Complete this form and e-file it, using the Notice of Change of Address event, in each 

case that you list below.

2. Update your contact information in CM/ECF. Click HERE for update instructions.

Name: Alexander G. Tievsky

Firm: Edelson PC

Street Address: 350 North LaSalle Street, 14th Floor

City/State/Zip Code: Chicago, Illinois 60654

Phone Number: 312-589-6379

Email address: atievsky@edelson.com

ARDC (Illinois State Bar members, only): 6321625

If you have previously filed an appearance with this court using a different name, enter that name.

N/A

List all active cases in which you currently have an appearance on file.

Case Number Case Title Assigned Judge 

1:16-cv-08694 Warciak V. Subway Restaurants, Inc. Hon. Charles P. Kocoras

1:16-cv-11057 Edelson PC v. The Bandas Law Firm, 

et al. 

Hon. Rebecca R. Pallmeyer

1:17-cv-07303 Howe v. Speedway LLC, et al. Hon. Andrea R. Wood

1:12-cv-04069 Birchmeier v. Caribbean Cruise Line Hon. Matthew F. Kennelly

/s/ Alexander G. Tievsky March 13, 2018

Signature of Attorney Date

Rev. 01272016

Case: 1:12-cv-04069 Document #: 696 Filed: 03/13/18 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:15192