alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 16 (Wednesday, January 27, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 7299-7300]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-01705]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke; Notice 
of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Neurological Disorders 
and Stroke Special Emphasis Panel; NINDS Human Biospecimen and Data 
Repository U24 Review.
    Date: February 11, 2021.
    Time: 1:00 p.m. to 3:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Neuroscience Center, 6001 
Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Li Jia, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, 
Scientific Review Branch, Division of Extramural Research, NINDS/
NIH, 6001 Executive Boulevard, Room 3208D, Rockville, MD 20852, 301-
451-2854, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e68a8fc88c8f87a6888f8ec8818990"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="513d387f3b3830113f38397f363e27">[email protected]</span></a>.


[[Page 7300]]


(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.853, 
Clinical Research Related to Neurological Disorders; 93.854, 
Biological Basis Research in the Neurosciences, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 21, 2021.
Melanie J. Pantoja,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2021-01705 Filed 1-26-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Top

Top

Top

## Director, Office of Strategic Partnerships
This  AGREEMENT was made on August 12, 1999 and replaces any previous contracts.

Between:  649.com,  inc,  ('ABET')

ABET  is  a  public  company  listed  on  the  OTC  Bulletin  Board.

And:     Brandon  Moase  ('BM')  as  Consultant.
         BM  is  a  resident  of  British  Columbia

ABET  is  prepared to have BM as the VP Operations under the following terms and
conditions:

1.     Term  and  Starting  Date:
The  initial  term  is  12 months starting August 13, 1999.  Renewable terms and
conditions  subject  to  board  approval.

2.     Compensation:
a)     Base  salary  of  $6,000  (Canadian)/monthly  paid  by-monthly.
b)     Signing  bonus of 250,000 shares of ABET to be awarded BM or his nominee.
       These  shares  to  be  released  to  BM  according  to  SEC  regulations,
c)     Stock  Options:  in  addition,  BM  to  be awarded options to purchase an
       additional  250,000  shares  at  50  cents  (US)/share (option good
       for 2 years)
d)     Out  of  pocket costs to be reimbursed, at cost to BM on a monthly basis,
e)     The 250,000 share stock option can only be exercised after the 12th month
       and  only  if  BM  has  remained  a  consultant  for  that  period.
f)     The  250,000  bonus  shares  are  awarded  as  follows:
       120,000  shares  March  1, 2000  and 15,000 shares per month, thereafter,
       for a total  of 180,000 over 12 months with an additional 70,000 shares
       due at the end of  the  12-month  period.

3.     Duties:
a)     Nominated  to  the  Board  of  ABET  as  director.



AGREED:                              SIGNED:

August  12,  1999                    August  12,  1999


/s/  Brandon  Moase                  /s/  Lawrence  P  Burbidge
Brandon  Moase                       649.com,  Inc.,  Lawrence  P  Burbidge,
President  and  CEO
Case: 1:11-cv-07734 Document #: 1 Filed: 10/31/11 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:1
Case: 1:11-cv-07734 Document #: 1 Filed: 10/31/11 Page 2 of 10 PageID #:1
Case: 1:11-cv-07734 Document #: 1 Filed: 10/31/11 Page 3 of 10 PageID #:1
Case: 1:11-cv-07734 Document #: 1 Filed: 10/31/11 Page 4 of 10 PageID #:1
Case: 1:11-cv-07734 Document #: 1 Filed: 10/31/11 Page 5 of 10 PageID #:1
Case: 1:11-cv-07734 Document #: 1 Filed: 10/31/11 Page 6 of 10 PageID #:1
Case: 1:11-cv-07734 Document #: 1 Filed: 10/31/11 Page 7 of 10 PageID #:1
Case: 1:11-cv-07734 Document #: 1 Filed: 10/31/11 Page 8 of 10 PageID #:1
Case: 1:11-cv-07734 Document #: 1 Filed: 10/31/11 Page 9 of 10 PageID #:1
Case: 1:11-cv-07734 Document #: 1 Filed: 10/31/11 Page 10 of 10 PageID #:1
#### The People of the State of New York v. Carl Edelson.

Motion for leave to appeal as a poor person from an order of the Court of General Sessions, filed December 7, 1960, denying writ of error *coram nobis*is in all respects denied. The same issues were decided adversely to this defendant on prior appeals. *(People*v. *Edelson,*7 A D 2d 717.) Defendant is not entitled to a second appellate review of the same arguments. Concur—Botein, P. J., Valente,'Stevens, Eager and Bergan, JJ.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**
**CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT**
I, Michael O. Moore, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of The CatoCorporation, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section1350, that on the date of this Certification:
1.  the Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended April 30, 2005 (the “Report”) fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and 2.  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.
Dated: June 6, 2005         /s/ Michael O. Moore   Michael O. Moore   Executive Vice President
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

MANUEL HERNANDEZ, )

on behalf of himself and all others )

similarly situated, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) No. 12-1228

v. )

) Honorable Judge Gettleman

PEOPLESCOUT, INC. and, )

SEATON, LLC. )

)

Defendants. )

NOTICE OF MOTION

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on April 11, 2012, at 9:15 a.m., we will appear before the 

Honorable Judge Gettleman or any Judge sitting in his stead in Courtroom 1703 of the Dirksen 

Federal Building, Chicago, Illinois, and will then and there present Seaton LLC’s Unopposed 

Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Plead.

Dated: April 4, 2012

Respectfully Submitted,

SEATON, LLC 

By: /s/ Sara E. Fletcher

One of its Attorneys

John T. Roache

Melissa A. Siebert

Robert R. Brown

Sara E. Fletcher

K& L GATES LLP

70 West Madison Street, Suite 3100

Chicago, Illinois 60602

312-372-1121 

Case: 1:12-cv-01228 Document #: 9 Filed: 04/04/12 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:19
- 2 -

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned, an attorney, certifies that she caused the foregoing Notice of Motion to 

be served upon the following persons via the Court’s CM/ECF system, which sends notification 

automatically when filed, on April 4, 2012:

Carlos Gerardo Becerra

122 South Michigan, Suite 1850 

Chicago, IL 60603 

312.753.6967 

becerra_carlos@yahoo.com

By: /s/ Sara E. Fletcher

Case: 1:12-cv-01228 Document #: 9 Filed: 04/04/12 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:20
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                     1,584
<RECEIVABLES>                                   76,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                77,584
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  77,584
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           66,750
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       271,991
<OTHER-SE>                                   (255,991)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    77,584
<SALES>                                            950
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   950
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      750
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (200)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       200
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> US

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-02-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                0.00001
<CASH>                                           3,505
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   40,592
<ALLOWANCES>                                       666
<INVENTORY>                                     56,987
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               109,805
<PP&E>                                          40,211
<DEPRECIATION>                                  33,743
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 151,206
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           95,384
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           140
<OTHER-SE>                                      12,990
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   151,206
<SALES>                                        221,286
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               221,286
<CGS>                                          177,005
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  177,005
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                67,038
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 4,998
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,014
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (27,628)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (621)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (27,007)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  (393)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (27,400)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (2.25)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.25)


</TABLE>
#### Richard King, Respondent, v. Claire King, Appellant.

In an action based upon an agreement of assignment of a portion of the proceeds of the settlement of a negligence action, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered November 21, 1963, which granted plaintiff’s motion: (a) to amend the complaint by increasing the *ad damnum*to $2,453.74; and (to) for summary judgment in said amount. Order modified: (a) by striking out the second and third ordering paragraphs granting summary judgment; and (b) by substituting therefor a provision denying plaintiff’s motion insofar as it seeks summary judgment. As so modified, order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements to defendant. In our opinion, the agreement sued upon is ambiguous in that, without resort to parol evidence, it may not be determined: (1) whether the parties’ intention was that plaintiff shall be reimbursed out of defendant’s recovery for his payments on account of defendant’s medical expenses, regardless of any collateral reimbursement he might also receive through medical insurance or other sources; or (2) whether their intention was that he shall be reimbursed simply for his net “ out of pocket ” expenses. Under the circumstances, summary judgment may not be granted (cf. *O’Connor-Sullivan*v. *Otto,*283 App. Div. 269, 271; *Utica Carting, Stor. & Contr. Co.*v. *World Fire & Mar. Ins. Co.,*277 App. Div. 483, 488). Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Brennan and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
#### 22.501 Scope of subpart.

This subpart prescribes policies and procedures to implement Executive Order 14063, Use of Project Labor Agreements for Federal Construction Projects, dated February 4, 2022 (3 CFR, 2023 Comp., pp 335-338).

[88 FR 88727, Dec. 22, 2023]
**CERTIFICATION**

**Exhibit 32.2**

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted), Robert G. Gargus, Chief Financial Officer of Applied Micro Circuits Corporation (the “Company”) hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge: 

(1) The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006 (the “Report”) fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the period covered by the Report. 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) or its staff upon request. 

This certification accompanies the Form10-K to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether madebefore or after the date of the Annual Report), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing. 

 

Date: January 9, 2007
Appeal No. 74-283.

#### Barbara S. Chase *et al. v.*Robert F. Burns *et al.*

*James J. Mullen,*for plaintiffsappellees. *Richard J. Israel,*Attorney General, *George H. Egan,*Special Asst. Attorney General, *Maurice W. Hendel,*for •defendants-appellants.

Motion to consolidate instant case with case of *Corona*v. *Burns,*114 R. I. 910, 329 A.2d 405 (1974), is granted. Motion for special assignment is granted, and the matter is assigned to the calendar for Monday, February 3, 1975, for hearing on the merits.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-10342 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus LARCARNLY CROSS, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 1:98-CR-41-1

-------------------- December 15, 1999 Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * Larcarnly Cross appeals the sentence imposed for his guilty plea conviction of distribution of less than 500 grams of cocaine. Cross argues that he is entitled to a two-point reduction in his base offense level for acceptance of responsibility under United States Sentencing Guideline § 3E1.1, despite twice testing positive for cocaine usage while on release pending sentencing. We will uphold the district court’s decision to deny a reduction in offense level for acceptance of responsibilityNo. 99-10342 -2- unless it is without foundation. United States v. Brace , 145 F.3d 247, 264 (5th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied , 119 S. Ct. 426 (1998). The district court’s decision not to award the reduction to Cross is not without foundation. See United States v. Watkins , 911 F.2d 983, 985 (5th Cir. 1990). The district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 10.08

                                  May 28, 1999

Mr. Alan Luckett
Hispano Television Ventures, Inc.
2426 Arbuckle Court

Dallas, Texas  75229


     Re:  Loan Agreement, dated May 28, 1999, by and among
          Hispano Television Ventures, Inc. and certain Investors
          named therein


Dear Alan:

     In connection with the above referenced agreement (the "Loan Agreement"),
this letter confirms that I am the sole shareholder of ATN Network, Inc., a
Texas corporation ("ATN"), having acquired the shares by assignment from Don
Shelton, Randy Moseley, Jerald Powell and Judy L. Bryant in December 1998. To
avoid legal action by me against the other shareholders for misrepresentation in
connection with my original investment in ATN, the prior shareholders of ATN
conveyed all the common stock of ATN to me at that time. I have furnished to you
original stock certificates endorsed in blank by all the prior shareholders as
evidence of the foregoing.

     Also accompanying this letter is an Assignment Separate from Certificate
conveying all of the issued and outstanding shares of ATN's capital stock to
Hispano Television Ventures, Inc. ("HTV"). This delivery is being made in
consideration for the issuance to me of 1,066,667 shares of HTV's common stock
pursuant to Section 4.01(f) of the Loan Agreement. In connection with such
issuance, I agree to be bound as though I were a "Principal" to the covenants
and agreements of the "Principals" set forth in Sections 5 and 6 of the Loan
Agreement relating to the election of directors of HTV and restrictions on
transfers of my shares of common stock of HTV; provided, however I intend to
transfer 533,333 of my HTV shares to Mr. Donald B. Sallee at the earliest date
possible. My transfer to Mr. Sallee will be subject to his agreement to be
similarly bound by Sections 5 and 6 of the Loan Agreement.

     Except for my intended transfer to Mr. Sallee, I represent to HTV that I am
acquiring its shares of common stock for my own account for the purpose of
investment and not with a view to or for sale in connection with any
distribution of the shares. I further understand that the HTV shares have not
been registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and that my
certificate and Mr. Sallee's certificate for the HTV shares will bear a legend
to that effect.

                                   Sincerely,

                                   /s/ Bob J. Bryant

                                   Bob J. Bryant

cc:  Doug Miller
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT

Everett McKinley Dirksen United States Courthouse

 Room 2722 - 219 S. Dearborn Street

 Chicago, Illinois 60604

Office of the Clerk

Phone: (312) 435-5850

www.ca7.uscourts.gov

FINAL JUDGMENT

January 6, 2017

Before: WILLIAM J. BAUER, Circuit Judge

 ILANA DIAMOND ROVNER, Circuit Judge

 DAVID F. HAMILTON, Circuit Judge

No. 16-1244

DIANE PARKER, 

Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

FOUR SEASONS HOTELS, LIMITED

Defendant - Appellee

Originating Case Information:

District Court No: 1:12-cv-03207

Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division

District Judge Manish S. Shah

The judgment of the District Court is REVERSED, with costs, and the case is

REMANDED in accordance with the decision of this court entered on this date.

form name: c7_FinalJudgment(form ID: 132)

Case: 16-1244 Document: 00712927349 Filed: 01/30/2017 Pages: 1

Case: 1:12-cv-03207 Document #: 250 Filed: 01/30/17 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:2404
#### In the Matter of Theresa Harris, Appellant, v. Charles Doley, Respondent.

Order, entered on December 26, 1963, dismissing petition in paternity proceeding, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the proceeding remanded to the trial court for a statement of the facts deemed essential to its determination. The dismissal of the proceeding by the trial court was without the statement of any facts or grounds, and, without knowing the basis for the determination, we are unable to properly review the same. The petitioner in these proceedings was a married woman and, although she had procured a decree of separation from her husband, there was evidence that thereafter she had cohabited with him with the result that he was responsible for an earlier and aborted pregnancy. The woman did testify, however, as to nonaccess for some time prior to and at about the time of the impregnation sought to be charged to respondent, but there was conflicting testimony as to the time and extent of respondent’s relations with her. The possibility of access by her husband was an issue required to be determined by the trial court. (See *Moy Mee Soo*v. *Leong Yook Yick,*21 A D 2d 45; *Matter of Findlay,*253 N. Y. 1.) The proceeding to establish paternity is a civil judicial proceeding and except where otherwise prescribed by the Family Court Act or by rule of the Administrative Board, the procedure is governed by the appropriate provisions of the Civil Practice Law and Rules. (See Family Ct. Act, § 165; art. 5; CPLR 101, 105, subd. [d].) Therefore, the decision of the court determining such a proceeding following a trial should state the facts it deems essential to support the determination. (CPLR 4213, subd. [b]; see, also, *Mason*v. *Lory Dress Co.,*277 App. Div. 660; *220-2 East 85th St.*v. *Fastenberg,*13 A D 2d 724; *Power*v. *Falk,*15 A D 2d 216; *Sager*v. *Sager,*21 A D 2d 183.) Where, as here, the evidence bearing upon the pivotal issue of paternity is conflicting and gives rise to varying inferences, and issues of credibility are required to be resolved, the trial court should have stated the essential facts which constituted the bases for its decision. Concur — Botein, P. J., McNally, Stevens, Eager and Steuer, JJ.