alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

KIRSHA BROWN-YOUNGER, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) No. 12 C 1979

)

LULU.COM, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

MEMORANDUM ORDER

This Court has been called upon to write several opinions in this action bought by pro se

plaintiff Kirsha Brown-Younger ("Brown-Younger"), most recently the July 3, 2012

memorandum opinion and order that sought to place in proper perspective the matters that had

gone before. That July 3 opinion concluded in this fashion:

As plain as Brown-Younger's multiple Rule 11 violations appear to be, Rule

11(c)(3) calls for her to be given the opportunity to show cause why no such

violations have taken place and, in this instance, why dismissal of this action is

not an appropriate sanction. This Court orders her to file such a showing on or

before July 24, 2012.

Now July 24 has come and gone without any further input from Brown-Younger, even

though she has earlier been an extraordinarily active litigant generating multiple filings. It must

be assumed, then, that she is unable to show cause as to why she should not be held to have

violated Rule 11 in the various respects earlier spoken of by this Court. As for the nature of the

sanctions to be imposed because of her multiple violations, dismissal of this action is certainly

Case: 1:12-cv-01979 Document #: 109 Filed: 07/25/12 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:384
appropriate, and this Court so orders. This Court will await input from any defense counsel who 1

may view further sanctions as called for (for example, earlier submissions on behalf of defendant

Amazon had included a Rule 11 warning letter sent to Brown-Younger early in the game).

__________________________________________

Milton I. Shadur

Senior United States District Judge

Date: July 25, 2012

 It will be recalled that this Court had earlier stated at page 10 of the July 3 opinion that 1

if what later emerged during these proceedings had been known from the beginning,

Brown-Younger would have been denied in forma pauperis status under the standards

exemplified by Lee v. Clinton. 

- 2 -

Case: 1:12-cv-01979 Document #: 109 Filed: 07/25/12 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:385
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES 

July 7, 2020 

Honorable Cade Brumley 

State Superintendent 

Louisiana Department of Education 

1201 North 3rd Street 

Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70802 

Cade.Brumley@la.gov

Dear State Superintendent Brumley: 

This letter grants final approval under Section 421(b) of the General Education Provisions Act 

for grant award H027A180033 and H173A180082. 

The Department received your June 9, 2020 request on behalf of the Louisiana Department of

Education for a waiver extending the period of availability for Federal fiscal year (FFY) 2018 

Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) Part B grant award funds. 

With this approval, the FFY 2018 IDEA Part B grant award funds will be available for obligation 

through September 30, 2021 and may be liquidated through December 30, 2021. 

Please contact your Office of Special Education Programs State Lead, Bryan Grigg, at 

Bryan.Grigg@ed.gov if you have any questions. 

Sincerely, 

/s/

Mark Schultz 

Commissioner, Rehabilitation Services Administration.

Delegated the authority to perform the functions and duties 

of the Assistant Secretary for the Office of Special 

Education and Rehabilitative Services.

cc: State Director 

400 MARYLAND AVE. S.W., WASHINGTON, DC 20202-2600 

www.ed.gov 

The Department of Education’s mission is to promote student achievement and preparation for global competitiveness 

by fostering educational excellence and ensuring equal access.
Sydor Aerial Photography Llc.

Anthony Sydor CEO

 Sydor Aerial Photography wishes to amend its current FAA section 

333 exemptions.

 Sydor Aerial Photography would like to add an additional aircraft. 

The addition aircraft will be known as Hycopter 1 UAS. Description of 

the Hycopter 1 UAS is as follows.

1) The Hycopter 1 UAS frame is a quadcopter configuration 

measuring 170cm x 170cm with propellers installed. Power source 

is incorporated into the airframe and is composed of a 3L 

composite H2 storage vessel, a 500W ultra-light fuel cell and a 

175g HES pressure reducer. Additionally, a lithium polymer 

battery is also used for peak power needs and serves as a safety 

backup. Take-off weight without payload is 5.2KG. Payload 

capacity is at or less than 1KG. The Hycopter 1 integrated energy 

platform is manufactured by HUS Unmanned Systems. www. 

hus.sg

2) Flight controller: DJI A2.

3) Tuned Propulsion System: E1200 Pro.

4) Transmitters: Futaba FASST series and DJI DESST series.
Case: 1:12-cv-01665 Document #: 154 Filed: 12/18/13 Page 1 of 9 PageID #:2730

Case: 1:12-cv-01665 Document #: 154 Filed: 12/18/13 Page 2 of 9 PageID #:2731

Case: 1:12-cv-01665 Document #: 154 Filed: 12/18/13 Page 3 of 9 PageID #:2732

Case: 1:12-cv-01665 Document #: 154 Filed: 12/18/13 Page 4 of 9 PageID #:2733

Case: 1:12-cv-01665 Document #: 154 Filed: 12/18/13 Page 5 of 9 PageID #:2734

Case: 1:12-cv-01665 Document #: 154 Filed: 12/18/13 Page 6 of 9 PageID #:2735

Case: 1:12-cv-01665 Document #: 154 Filed: 12/18/13 Page 7 of 9 PageID #:2736

Case: 1:12-cv-01665 Document #: 154 Filed: 12/18/13 Page 8 of 9 PageID #:2737

Case: 1:12-cv-01665 Document #: 154 Filed: 12/18/13 Page 9 of 9 PageID #:2738
U.S. Dept Commerce/NOAA/NMFS/NWFSC/Publications
NOAA-NMFS-NWFSC TM-31: Data Collection -- Groundfish 

Appendix A-4Another example of a California Department of Fish and Game Landing Receipt that is reserved for groundfish landings.
To return to text, use your browser's Back button. Table of Contents
Appeal No. 75-13.

#### Sylvia L. Kennedy *et al. v.*Providence Hockey Club, Inc.

*Gunning, LaFazia & Gnys, Inc., Robert K. Mills,*for plaintiffs.

Motion of the plaintiffs to extend the time for filing their brief to June 17, 1975 is granted.
This document was produced for the Substance Abuse and Mental Health

Services Administration (SAMHSA), U.S. Department of Health and Human

Services (HHS) under contract numbers 280-00-8049 with the New HampshireDartmouth Psychiatric Research Center and 270-03-6005 with Westat. 

Evidenced-based treatment works

Developing working alliances with 

consumers and families to support 

the recovery process.

Family 

Psychoeducation

CONTACT INFO HERE

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration

Center for Mental Health Services

www.samhsa.gov

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration

Center for Mental Health Services

www.samhsa.gov

Printed 2009 HHS Publication No. SMA-09-4422
Why participate 

in FPE?

Consumers who participate in FPE experience 

fewer relapses and less time in the hospital. 

Families who participate report greater knowledge of serious mental illnesses and less stress, 

confusion, and isolation. 

What is

Family Psychoeducation?

Family Psychoeducation (FPE), 

an evidence-based practice, 

gives consumers and families 

information about mental 

illnesses, helps them build 

social supports, and enhances 

problem-solving, communication, and coping skills.

How does FPE work?

Family Psychoeducation supports consumers and their families in the recovery process.

n Consumers 

define who 

family is 

Family includes anyone that consumers identify as being supportive 

in their recovery process. 

n	 Collaboration 

is key

FPE recognizes consumer and 

family strengths and experiences 

in living with mental illnesses 

and partners with them to support 

personal recovery goals. 

n Education 

promotes 

understanding

Consumers and families who are 

educated about mental illnesses 

can more effectively support one 

another.

n Ongoing 

guidance 

and training 

are effective

Learning techniques to reduce 

stress and improve communication 

and coping skills can strengthen 

family relationships and promote 

recovery.

n The 

problem-solving 

approach works

FPE focuses on current issues that 

consumers and families face and 

addresses them through a structured 

problem-solving approach.

n Multifamily 

groups enhance 

support

The multifamily group format 

allows consumers and families to 

connect with others and to receive 

peer support and mutual aid.
February 21, 1975.

Appeal No. 75-21.

#### Alexandro G. Morelli, Sr. *et al. v.*Mark M. Manoogian, *Sr. et al.*

*S. Thomas Cotroneo,*for plaintiffs. *Swan, Keeney, Jenckes & Asquith, Edward W. Moses,*for defendants.

Defendants having appealed from the ruling of the Superior Court denying their motion to dismiss said action on the ground service of process had not been made within a reasonable time, and the court’s granting of plaintiffs’ motion for leave to Serve Process out of Time, are hereby ordered to Show Cause why the appeal should not be dismissed in accordance with *Eidam*v. *Eidam,*108 R. I. 673, 279 A.2d 413*(1971); Sami*v. *Meloccaro,*110 R. I. 566, 294 A.2d 844 (1972). Defendants have twenty days from the date of this order to submit a memorandum in support of their appeal.
| 1. | I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K/A Amendment No. 1 for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2012 of Sparta Commercial Services, Inc.; |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | /s/ Anthony W. Adler        |   |
|--------|-----------------------------|--------|
|   | Anthony W. Adler            |   |
|   | Principal Financial Officer |   |
1

From:

Sent: Monday, July 20, 2015 12:59 PM

To: RedHill

Subject: Red Hill Aquifer

Follow Up Flag: Follow up

Flag Status: Flagged

Aloha; 

There is no rationale in keeping the fuel supply in and around the aquifer at Red Hill on Oahu. 

Any potential or likely contamination of precious drinking water is far and away more important than saving the US 

Government money by allowing fuel to be stored in a potentially hazardous location. Past tests have shown contamination 

and there is simply no way to guarantee the water will be kept safe for human consumption. 

The cost to the people of Hawaii is far more than any cost to the military. Our water is precious and so are our people, 

who rely on clean, safe water. 

Mahalo.
#### New York State Electric & Gas Corporation, Respondent, v. O. & W. Lines, Inc., Appellant, et al., Defendant.

In a proceeding instituted to acquire transmission line easements at places lying between the Villages of Walton in Delaware County and Norwich in Chenango County defendant, 0. & W. Lines, Inc., appeals from an order of the Supreme Court at Special Term denying its motion to disqualify one of the Commissioners of Appraisal appointed pursuant to section 13 of the Condemnation Law upon the ground that he is not a disinterested freeholder within the meaning of the statute. The integrity and good faith of the Commissioner are not questioned. During substantial portions of the years 1927, 1936 and 1942 this Commissioner was employed by the plaintiff or its predecessor. Acting as the agent of his employer he was engaged in procuring rights of way similar to those sought to be acquired in this proceeding and located in the same general area. Between 1929 and 1932 he was associated with a firm employed to negotiate the purchase of like rights for public utility corporations operating in the Cities of Binghamton and Elmira. A judicial proceeding must not be open to the slightest suspicion. Rigid adherence to this principle is imperative. In the light of the Commissioner’s employment by the plaintiff and his inevitable experiences on its side of the bargaining table in a field closely related to the instant appropriation process, the peril of subconscious bias on his part is not farfetched. In our view sound judicial policy dictates his replacement as a member of the commission. (Condemnation Law, § 13; *Matter of Village of Hempstead [Busch Props.],*265 App. Div. 819; *City of Plattsbwrg*v. *Kellogg,*254 App. Div. 455; *Matter of Low,*142 App. Div. 533, 536; *Rochester, Syracuse & Eastern R. R. Go.*v. *Tolan,*116 App. Div. 696; *Adirondack Power <Ss Light Corp.*v. *Prodger,*121 Mise. 280.) Order reversed, on the law and the facts and in the exercise of discretion, without costs and the proceeding remitted to Special Term for the appointment of a Commissioner in his place and stead. Bergan, P. J., Coon, Gibson, Reynolds and Taylor, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 23 (Friday, February 5, 2021)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 8283]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-01387]



========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents 
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed 
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published 
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.

The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents. 

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 23 / Friday, February 5, 2021 / Rules 
and Regulations

[[Page 8283]]



BUREAU OF CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION

12 CFR Part 1026

[Docket No. CFPB-2020-0028]
RIN 3170-AA98


Qualified Mortgage Definition Under the Truth in Lending Act 
(Regulation Z): Seasoned QM Loan Definition; Correction

AGENCY: Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection.

ACTION: Final rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection (Bureau) recently 
published ``Qualified Mortgage Definition Under the Truth in Lending 
Act (Regulation Z): Seasoned QM Loan Definition,'' which appeared in 
the Federal Register on December 29, 2020. This document corrects a 
scrivener's error in an amendatory instruction in that document.

DATES: Effective March 1, 2021.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Amanda Quester, Senior Counsel, Office 
of Regulations, at (202) 435-7700. If you require this document in an 
alternative electronic format, please contact 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#084b4e584a57496b6b6d7b7b616a6164617c71486b6e786a266f677e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="8bc8cddbc9d4cae8e8eef8f8e2e9e2e7e2fff2cbe8edfbe9a5ece4fd">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In FR Doc. 2020-27571 appearing on page 
86402 in the Federal Register of Tuesday, December 29, 2020, the 
following correction is made:


Sec.  1026.43  [Corrected]

0
On page 86452, in the second column, in amendment 2, the instruction 
``Amend Sec.  1026.43 by revising paragraphs (e)(1) and (e)(2) 
introductory text and adding paragraph (e)(7) to read as follows: '' is 
corrected to read: ``Amend Sec.  1026.43 by revising the headings for 
paragraphs (e) and (e)(1) and paragraphs (e)(1)(i) and (e)(2) 
introductory text and adding paragraph (e)(7) to read as follows:''.

    Dated: January 15, 2021.
Grace Feola,
Federal Register Liaison, Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection.
[FR Doc. 2021-01387 Filed 2-4-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-AM-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### 1852.216-75 Payment of fixed fee.

As prescribed in 1816.307-70(c), insert the following clause:

# Payment of Fixed Fee (DEC 1988)

The fixed fee shall be paid in monthly installments based upon the percentage of completion of work as determined by the Contracting Officer.

(End of clause)

[62 FR 3484, Jan. 23, 1997]
Case: 1:12-cr-00405 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/31/12 Page 1 of 8 PageID #:1
Case: 1:12-cr-00405 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/31/12 Page 2 of 8 PageID #:2
Case: 1:12-cr-00405 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/31/12 Page 3 of 8 PageID #:3
Case: 1:12-cr-00405 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/31/12 Page 4 of 8 PageID #:4
Case: 1:12-cr-00405 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/31/12 Page 5 of 8 PageID #:5
Case: 1:12-cr-00405 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/31/12 Page 6 of 8 PageID #:6
Case: 1:12-cr-00405 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/31/12 Page 7 of 8 PageID #:7
Case: 1:12-cr-00405 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/31/12 Page 8 of 8 PageID #:8
225.7301 General. ( a ) The U.S. Government sells defense articles and services to foreign governments or international organizations through FMS agreements. The agreement is documented in a Letter of Offer and Acceptance (LOA) (see the Defense Security Cooperation Agency (DSCA) Security Assistance Management Manual (DSCA 5105.38-M)).
( b ) Conduct FMS acquisitions under the same acquisition and contract management procedures used for other defense acquisitions.
( c ) Follow the additional procedures at PGI 225.7301(c) for preparation of solicitations and contracts that include FMS requirements.
( d ) See 229.170 for policy on contracts financed under U.S. assistance programs that involve payment of foreign country value added taxes or customs duties.
[70 FR 73155, Dec. 9, 2005, as amended at 80 FR 31310, June 2, 2015]
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

TODD L. BOWERS, INC., etc., )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) No. 12 C 3436

)

RBS CITIZENS FINANCIAL GROUP, )

INC., et al., )

)

Defendants. )

MEMORANDUM ORDER

Todd L. Bowers, Inc. (“Bowers”) has filed a Class Action

Complaint against three corporate defendants referred to

collectively as “Citizens Bank,” seeking to invoke federal

subject matter jurisdiction under CAFA (see 28 U.S.C. §1332(d)). 

Because this Court’s threshold look at the Complaint reveals two

questions in that respect, this memorandum order is issued sua

sponte. On or before May 22, 2012 Bowers’ counsel is ordered to

provide the following information that is unanswered in the

Complaint:

1. Complaint ¶¶4 and 5 do not provide the full

requisite citizenship information as to two of the

corporations included within the collective “Citizens Bank”

group.

2. Bowers is also silent as to the required objective

good faith belief (see Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(b)) for the

allegation in Complaint ¶7 that the amount in controversy

exceeds $5 million, as is required to bring this action
within CAFA.

If Bowers’ counsel fails to provide the requisite

information as to those two matters on or before May 22, this

Court will be constrained to dismiss this action for lack of

subject matter jurisdiction. If however the jurisdictional gaps

identified here have been closed by information provided during

that time frame, this Court will issue its customary initial

scheduling order.

________________________________________

Milton I. Shadur

Senior United States District Judge

Date: May 11, 2012

2
Case: 1:11-cv-07972 Document #: 154 Filed: 02/02/14 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:3021
Case: 1:11-cv-07972 Document #: 154 Filed: 02/02/14 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:3022
#### 232.006 Reduction or suspension of contract payments upon finding of fraud.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                  Exhibit 4.1(c)

         C - XX                                                 XXXXX

                              DECODE GENETICS, INC.

              Incorporated Under the Laws of the State of Delaware
                    4,583,334 SHARES SERIES C PREFERRED STOCK
                           Par Value $0.001 Per Share


THIS CERTIFIES THAT ___________________________ is the owner of
_________________________ (_______) shares of the SERIES C PREFERRED STOCK of
deCODE genetics, Inc., fully paid and non-assessable, transferable only on the
books of the Corporation in person or by Attorney upon surrender of this
Certificate properly endorsed.

                    The corporation will furnish without charge to each
stockholder who so requests, a statement of the powers, designations,
preferences and relative, participating, optional, or other special rights of
each class of stock or series thereof and the qualifications, limitations or
restrictions of such preferences and/or rights.

               IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused this Certificate
to be signed by its duly authorized officers as of
___________________A.D._______.



_____________________________________         _________________________________
DIANE M. FRENIER, ASSISTANT SECRETARY         KARI STEFANSSON, PRESIDENT
<PAGE>   2


For Value Received, _____ hereby sell, assign and transfer
unto________________________________________
______________________________________Shares represented by the within
Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint
___________________________________ Attorney to transfer the said Shares on the
books of the within named Corporation with full power of substitution in the
premises.

         Dated _________________

                  In the presence of _________________________________
Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    This quarterly report on Form 10-Q of
the Company for the quarter ended
March 31, 2010 (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and(2)
    
    The information contained in this Form
10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.
 Dated: May 11, 2010
    /s/ Robert J. DavisRobert J. DavisChief Financial Officer