alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
 
                                 EXHIBIT 23.1



                         INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S CONSENT


The Board of Directors
Lasertechnics, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements Nos. 33-
42214 and 33-98160 on Form S-8 and No. 333-10665 on Form S-3 of Lasertechnics,
Inc. and subsidiaries of our report dated February 21, 1997, relating to the
consolidated balance sheets of Lasertechnics, Inc. and subsidiaries as of
December 31, 1996 and 1995, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended December 31, 1996, which reports appear in the December
31, 1996 annual report on Form 10-KSB of Lasertechnics, Inc.

Our report dated February 21, 1997 contains an explanatory paragraph that states
that the Company's recurring losses from operations and resulting continued
dependence upon access to additional external financing raise substantial doubt
about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern.  The consolidated
financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the
outcome of this uncertainty.



                                     KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

Dallas, Texas
March 24, 1997
(January 9, 1979)

#### Milton Toppel, Appellant, v Estella Toppel, Respondent.

— Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, entered July 5, 1978, insofar as appealed from, which, *inter alia,*awarded custody of Lori to defendant and directed plaintiff to made additional support payments of $200 per week to the defendant for the support and maintenance of that child, unanimously modified, on the law, on the facts, and in the exercise of discretion, by vacating those provisions (1) awarding custody to the defendant and (2) directing the payment of additional support in the sum of $200, and, as modified, otherwise affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. A parent may not be awarded the custody of a child over 18 years of age (Domestic Relations Law, §§ 2, 240; *Blauner v Blauner,*60 AD2d 215, 218; *Silverman v Silverman,*50 AD2d 824). Hence, it was improper for the court to have awarded custody of Lori to the defendant. Although Lori had reached her majority, the plaintiff and the defendant were both under a continuing duty to support her until she reached 21 years of age. (Family Ct Act, §§ 413, 414; *Matter of Parker v Stage,*43 NY2d 128, 133; *Blauner v Blauner, supra; Stern v Stern,*59 AD2d 857; *Matter of Carter v Carter,*58 AD2d 438.) However, the record indicates that, even without the additional payment of $200 per week, Lori was receiving more than adequate support from both parents. Therefore, it was an abuse of discretion for the court to direct that the plaintiff make the additional payments of $200 per week to the defendant for the support and maintenance of the child during the four-*629month period that the child was not attending school. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Lupiano, Silverman, Evans and Fein, JJ.
HEABenOutputs_22MAR11.xls

Author: Abt Associates Inc. Created: 3/22/11

Worksheet Description

REG_ANNUAL_VALUES Annual restoration and annual willingness-to-pay by region and regulatory option

ANNUAL_WTP_3 Annualized willingness-to-pay by region and regulatory option using a 3% discount rate

ANNUAL_WTP_7 Annualized willingness-to-pay by region and regulatory option using a 7% discount rate Purpose: Outputs from the program estimating nonuse benefits using a habitat-based approach

File Info 1 of 5region staterest_id cost_acre numHHreg_HH frac_tmn1 frac_tmn2 frac_tmn3 frac_tmn4 frac_baseline

calif total ca_kelp 505332 12371969.97 35.93493651 2502.929955 2616.815411 34.93194076 2930.34483 greatlakes total gl_typh 89215 32645530.65 3090.945299 5195.398855 5228.573291 3064.819418 5654.023822 gulfmexico total gom_spa 36779 18225010.59 4121.992383 11957.8294 11978.10959 4090.876794 15157.61496 inland total in_typh 67180 112801078.9 41834.23272 69927.06127 71390.12725 40812.91706 76431.81308 midatlantic total ma_spar 104386 20974820.17 5150.022861 34510.62792 34890.32154 5145.16001 37242.11798 northatlantic total na_eelg 616862 5398807.155 22.88468722 2600.903111 2727.204673 22.88468722 3183.345998 southatlantic total sa_spar 60180 16005225.16 159.0965751 346.1975466 346.5370462 159.0965751 409.5189545

REG_ANNUAL_VALUES 2 of 5reg_WTP_1 reg_WTP_2 reg_WTP_3 reg_WTP_4 reg_WTP_bas 0 0 0 0 0 11979.45504 17779.78746 17778.79079 11949.09245 19324.76639 176729.001 574176.9887 573136.7397 175923.6553 749448.7585 159527.9606 251331.1839 257193.8617 155340.5391 270549.1088 242216.0033 2121971.581 2144151.9 243229.6073 2286940.34 533.8879358 322365.5845 338713.5777 544.2244662 397870.6372 410.7813258 722.8766459 721.5356048 414.6546717 813.3221309

REG_ANNUAL_VALUES 3 of 5region tmn1 tmn2 tmn3 tmn4 baseline

calif 0 0 0 0 0 greatlakes 10398.51 12188.012 12178.974 10372.15 18878.899 gulfmexico 153405.8 390553.51 389569.81 152706.7 732157.23 inland 138474.8 167776.64 170581.93 134840 264306.91 midatlantic 210250.4 1280387.9 1295374.7 211130.2 2234175.3 northatlantic 463.4299 216230.75 226934.2 472.4023 388690.84 southatlantic 356.5699 470.66341 469.66168 359.932 794.5569

ANNUAL_WTP_3 4 of 5region tmn1 tmn2 tmn3 tmn4 baseline

calif 0 0 0 0 0 greatlakes 9666.937 9587.584 9576.727 9642.436 19194.211 gulfmexico 142613.2 305859.9 304964.7 141963.3 744385.59 inland 128732.6 129956.7 131619.1 125353.6 268721.32 midatlantic 195458.6 929058.4 940749.9 196276.5 2271490.1 northatlantic 430.826 167965.1 176159.2 439.1672 395182.68 southatlantic 331.484 359.0887 358.2637 334.6096 807.82745

ANNUAL_WTP_7 5 of 5
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002**

**(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**

In connection with the Annual Report of BancTec, Inc, a Delawarecorporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2006as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, J.Coley Clark, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that tomy knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| /s/   J. Coley Clark    |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------|
|                                   |
| J. Coley Clark                         |
| President and Chief Executive  Officer |
|                                   |
| April 2, 2007                          |

 

A signed original of this written statement required by 18 USC Section1350 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

----
?

1⁄2

1⁄4

1⁄2

1⁄4

4400

4300

4350

4150

4150

4400

4150

4300

4300

4300

4300

4250

4050

4400

4400

4300

4100

4150

4200

4250

4350

4400

4300

4150

N 0 2 2 0 R D

N 0 2 0 0 R D

D 0 2 0 6 R D

N 0 2 2 0 R D

E 01 8 0 R D

N 0 1 6 3 R D

E 0 0 9 5 R D

E 0 1 6 0 R D

E 01 5 0 R D

N 0 2 10 R D

E 01 8 0 R D

E 01 6 0 R D

N 0 1 6 3 R D

N 0 2 2 0 R D

N 0 2 0 0 R D

D 0 2 0 6 R D

N 0 2 2 0 R D

E 01 8 0 R D

N 0 1 6 3 R D

E 0 0 9 5 R D

E 0 1 6 0 R D

E 01 5 0 R D

N 0 2 10 R D

E 01 8 0 R D

E 01 6 0 R D

N 0 1 6 3 R D

Cold

Springs

Creek

Cold Springs Cre

e

k

Cold

Springs Cree

k

Cold Sprin

gs Creek

Cold

Spr ings Creek

Cold Springs

Creek

Cold Springs Creek

Cold Springs

Creek

Cold Springs Creek C

old

Springs Creek

Autograph

Cliff

7

47'

40

40

102°

40

83

40

03

000m 45'

03

47'

40

40

06

76

40

580

73

45'

06

40'

09

11

N

7

40

52' 7

79

7

610

30"

76

7 000

78

102°

680

40

7 7

FEET

83

40

02 05

000m

40

30"

05

40

09

102°

710

40

80

50'

72

45' 42'

75

72

40

7

E

82

7

7

30"

75

36°

08

40

40

40

40'

30"

7

40

30"

36°

40

82

01

40

000

52'

40

78

37'

08

FEET

FEET

000m

71

7

71

7 01

81

70

74

42'

000

7 7

37'

77

40

30"

7

50'

36°

40

40

04

81

000m

40

36°

N

7 04 10

30"

07

30"

11

7

77

40

07

45'

000

74

70

7 102°

40

E

80

7

73

FEET

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

ADJOINING 7.5' QUADRANGLES

QUADRANGLE LOCATION

AUTOGRAPH CLIFF, OK

2010

Interstate Route State Route

ROAD CLASSIFICATION

WX Interstate Route /. US Route H State Route

Ramp 4WD

US Route Local Road

AUTOGRAPH CLIFF QUADRANGLE

OKLAHOMA

7.5-MINUTE SERIES

Zone 13S

Imagery.......................................................NAIP, May 2008

Roads.........................National Transportation Dataset, 2005

Names...............................................................GNIS, 2008

Hydrography.................National Hydrography Dataset, 2008

Contours............................National Elevation Dataset, 2007

North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83)

World Geodetic System of 1984 (WGS84). Projection and

1 000-meter grid: Universal Transverse Mercator,

Produced by the United States Geological Survey

10 000-foot ticks: Oklahoma Coordinate System of 1983

(north zone)

1000 500 0 METERS 1000 2000

1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000

FEET

This map was produced to conform with version 0.5.10 of the

draft USGS Standards for 7.5-Minute Quadrangle Maps.

A metadata file associated with this product is also draft version 0.5.10

SCALE 1:24 000

1 0.5 0 1

MILES

1 0.5 0 KILOMETERS 1 2

×

Ù

MN

GN

UTM GRID AND 2010 MAGNETIC NORTH DECLINATION AT CENTER OF SHEET

1° 23 ́

25 MILS

7° 37 ́

136 MILS

U.S. National Grid

100,000-m Square ID

Grid Zone Designation

13S

GA

CONTOUR INTERVAL 10 FEET

Autograph

Cliff NW Kenton NE

Boise

City NW

Razor

Blade

Mesa

Felt NE Boise

City

Autograph

Cliff Kenton SE FlaggSprings

OKLAHOMA
#### In the Matter of Louis Sabel, Appellant, against William S. Hults, as Commissioner of the Bureau of Motor Vehicles of the State of New York, Respondent.

Order unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondent. No opinion. Concur — Botein, P. J., Rabin, Valente, McNally and Bastow, JJ.
1815.305-70 Identification of unacceptable proposals. ( a ) The contracting officer shall not complete the initial evaluation of any proposal when it is determined that the proposal is unacceptable because: ( 1 ) It does not represent a reasonable initial effort to address the essential requirements of the RFP or clearly demonstrates that the offeror does not understand the requirements;
( 2 ) In research and development acquisitions, a substantial design drawback is evident in the proposal, and sufficient correction or improvement to consider the proposal acceptable would require virtually an entirely new technical proposal; or
( 3 ) It contains major deficiencies or omissions or out-of-line costs which discussions with the offeror could not reasonably be expected to cure.
( b ) The contracting officer shall document the rationale for discontinuing the initial evaluation of a proposal in accordance with this section.
[63 FR 9954, Feb. 27, 1998, as amended at 63 FR 44408, Aug. 19, 1998; 83 FR 28386, June 19, 2018]
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Team, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the
period ended May 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ted W. Owen, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------
|/s/ TED W.
OWEN                                  
|Ted W. Owen                                      
|Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|August 11, 2009
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

About EDOFFICES

About FOIA | About the Privacy Act | FOIA Reading RoomsMaking a Request | FAQs | Contacts | **Links**

## Links

**Disclaimer**

### Federal Agencies

                -  Department of Justice 
                - FOIA.gov
                -  National Archives and Records Administration

----

 

 Printable view

## How Do I Find...

          - Student loans, forgiveness
          - College accreditation
          - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
          - FERPA
          - FAFSA
          - 1098, tax forms

More >

## Information About...

          - Transforming Teaching
          - Family and Community Engagement
          - Early Learning

 

|  |
|--|
|  |
|  | How to File a Complaint |  |
|  |
|  | Topics A-Z |  |
|  |
|  | Civil Rights Data Collection (CRDC) |  |
|  |
|  | Other Civil Rights Agencies |  |
|  |
|  | Recursos de la Oficina Para Derechos Civiles en Español |  |
|  |
|  | Resources Available in Other Languages |  |
|  |

----

*Our mission*

Student Loans
Repaying LoansDefaulted LoansLoan ForgivenessLoan Servicers

Grants & Programs
Apply for Pell GrantsGrants ForecastApply for a GrantEligibility for Grants

Laws & Guidance
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)FERPACivil RightsNew IDEA Website

Data & Research
Education StatisticsPostsecondary Education DataED Data ExpressNation's Report CardWhat Works Clearinghouse

About Us
Contact UsED OfficesJobsPress ReleasesFAQsRecursos en españolBudget, PerformancePrivacy ProgramSubscribe to E-Mail Updates

----

          - Notices
          - FOIA
          - Privacy Policy
          - Accessibility
          - Security
          - Information quality
          - Inspector General
          - Whitehouse.gov
          - USA.gov
          - Benefits.gov
          - Regulations.gov
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Shelly Davis, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously modified, on the law and facts, and, as modified, affirmed in accordance with the same memorandum as in *People v Thomas*(66 AD2d 1001). (Appeal from judgment of Monroe County Court—assault, second degree, and other charges.) Present—Marsh, P. J., Moule, Dillon, Schnepp and Witmer, JJ.
# U.S. Department of Education

# Negotiated Rulemaking

# 1990 K St., NW, 8th Floor Conference Center

# Washington, D.C.

# Title IV Loans

# Meeting Three

# April 28 – 30, 2015 

# 9:00 am – 5:00 pm

# DRAFT AGENDA

**Welcome**

**Review Agenda**

**Review Meeting Summary for Session Two**

**Discuss Issues and Revise Proposed Regulatory Language**

· **Service Members Civil Relief Act (SCRA)**

· **Pay As You Earn (PAYE)**

· **Easing the Transition of Borrowers from Rehabilitation to Servicing**

· **Participation Rate Index Appeal**

· **Application of Department of Defense Lump Sum Payments for Public Service Loan Forgiveness**

· **Technical Correction for FFEL Rehabilitated Loans**

**Consensus Approvals**

**Regulation Development Process after Negotiated Rulemaking**

**Next Steps**

· **Regulatory Text**

· **Meeting Summary**

· **Preamble**

· **Other**

**Public Comment**

4/20/2015
No. 07-13-00388-CR

Harold Rosales From the 211th District Court

 Appellant of Denton County

v. July 28, 2014

The State of Texas Opinion by Justice Campbell

 Appellee

§

§

§

§

§

§

J U D G M E N T

Pursuant to the opinion of the Court dated July 28, 2014, it is ordered, adjudged

and decreed that the judgment of the trial court be affirmed.

Inasmuch as this is an appeal in forma pauperis, no costs beyond those which

may have been paid are adjudged.

It is further ordered that this decision be certified below for observance.

o O o

FILE COPY
#### 1337.204 Guidelines for determining availability of personnel.

The designee authorized to make the determinations described under FAR 37.204 is set forth in CAM 1301.70.
#### Empire Crafts Corporation, Respondent, v. Grace China Co., Inc., et al., Appellants.

In an action to recover damages for interference with the plaintiff’s contractual rights, the defendants appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, made January 31, 1964 Upon the written decision and opinion of the court after a nonjury trial, awarding $62,859.33 to the plaintiff. Judgment modified on the law and the facte as follows: (1) by striking out its third decretal paragraph directing recovery by plaintiff against defendants of the total sum of $62,859.33, which comprises the principal sum of $46,186.96, interest thereon of $16,142.37 for the period February 13, 1958 to December 10, 1963, and costs of $530; and (2) by substituting therefor a provision directing recovery by plaintiff against defendants of the principal sum of $17,535.99, with interest thereon of *889$3,156.48 for the three-year period commencing January 1, 1961, plus $530 costs, making a total of $21,222.47; and directing execution therefor against defendants. As so modified, judgment affirmed, without costs. Finding of fact No. 16 to the effect that by reason of the conspiracy plaintiff sustained damage in recruiting and training new sales people; and finding of fact No. 17 to the effect that by reason of defendants’ acts plaintiff sustained damages of $46,186.96, consisting of $30,434 for the cost of recruiting a sales force, $3,607.01 for the cost of rereeruiting some of plaintiff’s personnel, and $12,145.95 for the loss of profits for the year 1958, are reversed. In lieu of said findings No. 16 and No. 17, a finding is made that by reason of defendants’ acts the plaintiff sustained total damages of $17,535.99 for the three years 1958, 1959 and 1960; and that plaintiff is entitled to interest thereon of $3,156.48, computed at the rate of 6%' per annum for the three-year period commencing January 1, 1961. In our opinion, the evidence warrants the conclusion that the defendants are severally liable for an unjustified interference with the plaintiff’s contractual rights (A. *S. Rampell, Inc.,*v. *Hyster Co.,*3 N Y 2d 369; *Coleman & Morris*v. *Pisciotta,*279 App. Div. 656). We find that the evidence showed that the loss of profits sustained by the plaintiff due to the loss of the De Luca group was a total of $17,535.99 sustained over the years 1958, 1959 and 1960. The amount awarded as damages for recruiting and training fees actually represents the commissions paid on sales, and not damages, since such commissions would have been incurred even had there been no interference. The amount awarded as a rereeruiting fee is likewise a commission paid in the regular course of business, and not damages. There was no showing of a compensable profit made by Grace China Co. We also believe that interest should run from the date the total damages were sustained, namely, January 1, 1961. (For prior decisions in this action, see 40 Misc 2d 957, affid. 20 A D 2d 851.) Ughetta, Acting P. J., Christ, Brennan, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with  the  Annual  Report  of Golf  Rounds.com,  Inc.  (the
     "Company")  on Form  10-KSB for the period  ended  August 31, 2003 as filed
     with the Securities and Exchange  Commission  (the  "Report"),  each of the
     undersigned,  in the capacities and on the dates  indicated  below,  hereby
     certifies  pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to
     Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   the Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

Dated: October 22, 2003       By: /s/ John F. McCarthy, III
                                  -----------------------------------------
                                  John F. McCarthy, III
                                  Chairman and Secretary
                                  (Principal Executive Officer)

Dated: October 22, 2003       By: /s/  Robert H. Donehew
                                  -----------------------------------------
                                  Robert H. Donehew
                                  President, Treasurer and Director
                                  (Principal Financial Officer)
Net Generation by State, Type of Producer and Energy Source

YEAR STATE TYPE OF PRODUCER ENERGY SOURCE GENERATION 

(Megawatthours)

Page 1