alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FAA Home
Airports
Resources
Series 150 Advisory Circulars (ACs) for Airport Projects

# AC 00-56A - Voluntary Industry Distributor Accreditation Program (Cancelled)

- ShareShare
- 

- Facebook					Share on Facebook
- Twitter					Tweet on Twitter

## Document Information

- Number
- 00-56A
- Title
- Voluntary Industry Distributor Accreditation Program
- Date cancelled
- 2015-05-27
- Cancellation notes
- AC 00-56B
- Date issued
- 2002-06-13
- Office of Primary Responsibility
- AFS-300
- Description
-  	Describes a system for the voluntary accreditation of civil aircraft parts distributors on the basis of voluntary industry oversight and provides information that may be used for developing accreditation programs. The FAA believes such programs will assist in alleviating lack of documentation and will improve traceability. 
- Content
-    -  AC00-56A.pdf  (PDF) 
- Cancels
-  CancelsNumberTitleDate00-56Voluntary Industry Distributor Accreditation Program												Describes a system for the voluntary accreditation of civil aircraft parts distributors on the basis of voluntary industry oversight and provides information that may be used for developing accreditation programs. The FAA believes such programs will assist in alleviating lack of documentation and will improve traceability. 											1996-09-05 

## View All

      - Current Series 150 ACs
      - Cancelled Series 150 ACs
      - Draft Series 150 ACs
      - Advisory Circulars

## Export All

      - Current Series 150 ACs  (CSV)
      - Cancelled Series 150 ACs  (CSV)

## Top Requests

      - AC 150/5300-13B, Airport Design
      - AC 150/5320-6G, Airport Pavement Design and Evaluation
      - AC 150/5370-10H, Standards for Specifying Construction of Airports
      - AC 150/5340-1M, Standards for Airport Markings
      - AC 150/5340-30J, Design and Installation Details for Airport Visual Aids
      - AC 150/5390-2C, Heliport Design
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 13 (Friday, January 22, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 6740]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-01371]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel's Special Projects 
Committee

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel's Special 
Projects Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is 
soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on improving 
customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Wednesday, February 10, 2021.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Antoinette Ross at 1-888-912-1227 or 
202-317-4110.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel's Special Projects 
Committee will be held Wednesday, February 10, 2021, at 1:30p.m. 
Eastern Time. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit 
written statements for consideration. Due to limited time and structure 
of meeting, notification of intent to participate must be made with 
Antoinette Ross. For more information please contact Antoinette Ross at 
1-888-912-1227 or 202-317-4110, or write TAP Office, 1111 Constitution 
Ave. NW, Room 1509, Washington, DC 20224 or contact us at the website: 
http://www.improveirs.org. The agenda will include various IRS issues.

    Dated: January 15, 2021.
Kevin Brown,
Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. 2021-01371 Filed 1-21-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
<CURRENCY> US DOLLAR
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-02-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-04-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-02-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                0.00001
<CASH>                                           2,754
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   22,158
<ALLOWANCES>                                       512
<INVENTORY>                                     23,090
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                52,967
<PP&E>                                          35,881
<DEPRECIATION>                                  30,932
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  69,355
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           37,987
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           118
<OTHER-SE>                                      25,920
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    69,355
<SALES>                                        133,491
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               133,491
<CGS>                                           94,071
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   94,071
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                37,339
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,953
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 485
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,860
<INCOME-TAX>                                        35
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,825
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,825
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.17
        


</TABLE>
September30, 2015

Michael 

### J. O'Donnell, A.A.E. DirectorofAirport Safety and Standards Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20591

Re: Skydiving Operations at Grand Strand Airport

Dear Mr. O'Donnell:

As was relayed in our letterto you dated September 17, 2015, it is a paramount concern for the Harry County Department ofAirports to maintain safe operations for all aeronautical users and operators at Grand Strand Airport. As HCDA awaits a decision from FAA on our prior request to immediately discontinue skydiving operations at CRE, close the LZ, and withdraw from the existing LOA, I did want to make you aware of two additional incidents that have occurred just since the date of our prior correspondence. In one incident, an errant skydivertouched down outside the landing zone on September 19, 2015, landing between the AirTraffic Control Tower and Taxiway Alpha. In a separate incidentthat occurred on September 27, 2015, a wayward parachutist landed on Taxiway Alpha, just northeast ofTaxiways Tango and Charlie. While it is fortunate that no injuries or property damage were reported as the result ofeither incident, HCDAfearsthat itwill only be a matteroftime beforewe arewritingto inform you ofacatastrophic result. As such, HCDA reiterates its request for FAA concurrence to immediately discontinue skydiving operations at CRE, close the LZ, and withdrawfrom the existing LOA. Thank you for your consideration ofthis urgent matter, and should you have any questions or if I
can be ofassistance in any way, please do not hesitate to contact me.

nyours,

# ~~~

Director, Harry County Department ofAirports

1100J8tport Road • Myrtle Beach, SC 29577 • P843 448 1580 • F843 626 9096 • www FlyMyrtleBeach comcc: Winsome Lenfert Heather Haney Larry Clark John Marshall Ricarldo Washington Ron Caraway Herman Smith Marcus Valdes Jeffery Coley Rolando Caparas Steven Hicks Ruth Maestre Thomas Walsh LarryAyers James Cline Gary Pendleton Joseph Roberts Glen Ray Daniel Jones Tom Moyer Reginald C. Govan, Esq

. David Bannard,Esq

. Arrigo Carotti, Esq. Randy Haldi, Esq.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Boyd )

)

 ) Case No: 12-cv-2965

v. )

 ) Judge: John Z. Lee

 )

)

Hardy et al )

ORDER

The Court has received Petitioner's letter dated 2/19/2018 [66]. Petitioner states that he has been

on a hunger strike since 2/13/18 after his cellmate and a prison guard conspired to plant a razor

on him during a strip search. Petitioner then states that much of his legal materials and

personal property have been stolen, that he has been denied paper, hygiene materials and access 

to shower . Petitioner is advised that the Court is unable to address prison conditions on a

petition for writ of habeas corpus. To address concerns about prison conditions that violate 

Petitioner's constitutional rights, Petitioner may file a complaint under 42 U.S.C. 1983. The 

Clerk shall mail a copy of this order to the Western Illinois Correctional Center so that the 

Warden is advised of Plaintiff's allegations of conditions.

____________________

John Z. Lee

United States District Court Judge

3/9/18

Case: 1:12-cv-02965 Document #: 67 Filed: 03/09/18 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:2159
#### Miles *v.*Bank of Harlem.

February 26, 1913.

Complaint. Before Judge Hammond. Columbia superior court. September 25, 1911.

*W. E. Fleming,*for plaintiff in error. *John T. West,*contra.

Beck, J.

The title of the holder of a note can not be inquired into, unless it is necessary for the protection of the defendant, or to let in-the defense which he seeks to make. Civil Code, § 4290.

*(а)*Accordingly, where a suit was brought on a negotiable promissory note payable to the order of a decedent and alleged to have been transferred for value by his administrator and indorsed by him. before due, 'there was no error in overruling a demurrer thereto.

(б) Where in such a case the defendant pleaded that' the note was given for the purchase-price of a certain horse, with a guaranty of its soundness and with the privilege in the purchaser to try it and return it if not found satisfactory,' and that after a trial the horse was found to be not sound 'and was tendered back to the vendor, but he refused to receive it, and that the plaintiff was not such a bona fide holder of the note as to cut off the right of defendant to plead failure of consideration; but where on the trial'no evidence was introduced on the part of the defendant to sustain such defense, and that introduced on behalf of the plaintiff showed that after making complaint about the horse the defendant retained the horse and signed the note on which suit was brought, there was no error in directing a verdict in favor of the plaintiff.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices cúncur.*
<PAGE>
<PAGE>
                                                           EXHIBIT 10(j)
GOLDEN AMERICAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
                            SURPLUS NOTE

Golden American Life Insurance Company agrees to pay Equitable of
Iowa Companies, an Iowa corporation, the sum of $25 million
($25,000,000.00) plus interest at the rate of 8.25%  per annum from
the date hereof, December 17, 1996 until paid.  In any event, this
note will mature on December 17, 2026.

This Surplus Note and accrued interest thereon shall be subordinate
to payments due to policyholders, claimant and beneficiary claims, as
well as debts owed to all other classes of debtors of Golden American
Life Insurance Company in the event of (a) the institution of
bankruptcy, reorganization, insolvency or liquidation proceedings by
or against Golden American Life Insurance Company, or (b) the
appointment of a Trustee, receiver or other Conservator for a
substantial part of Golden American Life Insurance Company
properties.

Any payments made shall first apply to accrued interest, and the
balance of such payment shall apply to reduce the principal of this
Note.

Any payment of principal and/or interest made shall be subject to the
prior approval of the Delaware Insurance Commissioner.  If the
Commissioner has not approved payment of principal to retire the note
prior to its maturity date, the maturity date will be automatically
extended until such time as the Commissioner authorizes payment of
the final balance of principal.

Golden American Life Insurance Company hereby waives presentment and
notice of dishonor.

In witness whereof, Golden American Life Insurance Company has caused
this Note to be executed and delivered.


                                GOLDEN AMERICAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

                                By:  /s/ Terry L. Kendall
                                     ---------------------------------
                                     Terry L. Kendall, President and CEO


Attest by:


/s/ Myles R. Tashman
------------------------------
Myles R. Tashman
Executive Vice President and
General Counsel

<PAGE>
<PAGE>
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed July 28, 2021. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D20-0975 Lower Tribunal No. 19-5733

________________ 

### Alexis Gonzalez, et al. , Appellants, vs. 

### Florida Insurance Guaranty Association ,

Appellee. An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Pedro P. Echarte, Jr., Judge. Billbrough & Marks, P.A., and Geoffrey B. Marks, for appellants. Conroy Simberg, and Hinda Klein (Hollywood), for appellee. Before FERNANDEZ, C.J., and HENDON and BOKOR, JJ. PER CURIAM. Affirmed.
**Exhibit 10.15**

BRIGGS & STRATTON CORPORATION 

FORM 10-Q forQuarterly Period Ended September 27, 2009 

Exhibit 10.15 

AMENDMENT TO THE BRIGGS & STRATTON CORPORATION 

KEYEMPLOYEE SAVINGS AND INVESTMENT PLAN 

Adopted by the Board of Directors on October 21, 2009 

FURTHER RESOLVED, that Section 4.1 of the Briggs & StrattonCorporation Key Employee Savings and Investment Plan is hereby amended to read as follows: 

“4.1 Employee MatchingContributions Amount. 

(a) For each pay period the Employer shall credit to each Participant’s Employer MatchingContribution Account an amount equal to 50% of the Participant’s Deferral Contributions under Sections 3.1 and 3.2 above, for such pay period; provided, however, that the total Employer Matching Contributions for any pay period shall be limitedso that they do not exceed (i) 3.5% of the Regular Compensation and Total Bonus Payout of the Participant for such pay period minus (ii) an amount equal to (A) times (B) where (A) is 3.5% and (B) is theParticipant’s Regular Compensation and Total Bonus Payout for such pay period minus the amount of his Deferred Contributions under Article III for such pay period. The offset under clause (ii) of the preceding sentence shall cease to beapplied in pay periods after the cumulative amount of the Participant’s Regular Compensation and Total Bonus Payout minus the amount of his Deferral Contributions under Article III for the Plan Year equals the dollar amount described inInternal Revenue Code Section 401(a)(17), as adjusted for cost of living increases. If the dollar limitation under Section 401(a)(17) is adjusted during the Plan Year, the offsets under clause (ii) above shall be resumed if necessaryso that the total amount of the offsets under clause (ii) above equal 3.5% of the limitation under Code Section 401(a)(17) as in effect at the end of the Plan Year or, if less, 3.5% of the Participant’s Regular Compensation and TotalBonus Payout for the Plan Year minus the amount of his Deferral Contributions under Article III for the Plan Year. 

(b)Notwithstanding paragraph (a) above, no Employer Matching Contributions shall be made pursuant to this Section 4.1 with respect to any period of time after June 30, 2009. 

(c) The preceding paragraph (b) shall cease to be of any applicability for Plan Years beginning after December 31, 2009.”

FURTHER RESOLVED, that the appropriate officers of this Corporation are hereby authorized and directed to take any and all such furtheractions as they deem necessary or desirable in order to implement the foregoing resolutions.
#### 22.1308 Complaint procedures.

Following agency procedures, the contracting office must forward any complaints received about the administration of the Act to the Veterans' Employment and Training Service of the Department of Labor, or to the Director, Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210, or to any OFCCP regional, district, or area office or through the local Veterans' Employment Representative or designee, at the local State employment office. The Director, Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs, is responsible for investigating complaints.

[75 FR 60251, Sept. 29, 2010]
Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed June 14, 2018.

In The 

Fourteenth Court of Appeals 

NO. 14-17-00978-CR

AKEEM ALAJUWON GREEN, Appellant 

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee 

On Appeal from the 177th District Court 

Harris County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. 1445761 

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N 

Appellant was indicted for burglary of a habitation. The State agreed to 

abandon two enhancement paragraphs in exchange for appellant’s guilty plea 

without an agreed recommendation as to sentencing. The trial court sentenced 

appellant to 16 years in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of 

Criminal Justice. Appellant filed a notice of appeal. We dismiss the appeal. 

The trial court entered a certification of the defendant’s right to appeal in 

which the court certified that appellant waived his right of appeal. See Tex. R. App. 
2

P. 25.2(a)(2). The trial court’s certification is included in the record on appeal. See

Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d). The record supports the trial court’s certification. See Dears 

v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610, 615 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005); Jones v. State, 488 S.W.3d 

801, 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 2016) (upholding waiver of right to appeal because 

defendant received consideration for waiver by State agreeing to abandon one of two 

enhancement paragraphs).

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.

PER CURIAM 

Panel consists of Justices Boyce, Christopher, and Busby. 

Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)
**IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS**

((((((((((((((((

No. 10-1011

((((((((((((((((

In Re  Sarah Kovich, Relator

((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus

((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((

**ORDER**

1.The unopposed motion to abate original proceeding, filed on January 5, 2011, is granted.  This case is **ABATED** pursuant to Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 7.2(b).

2.This case is removed from the Court's active docket until further order of this Court.  The parties shall timely notify this Court of all events affecting the status of this case, including when the successor judge has ruled in accordance with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 7.2(b).  The parties shall file either a status report or motion to dismiss by March 8, 2011.

3.The Supreme Court of Texas lifts in part the stay order issued December 14, 2010 to allow the new trial court judge to reconsider the November 17, 2010 Order Denying Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Standing in Cause No. 10-16367-R, styled *In the Interest of P.J. and N.J.K., Minor Children*, in the 254th District Court of Dallas County, Texas.

Done at the City of Austin, this 7th day of January, 2011.

Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk

Supreme Court of Texas

By Claudia Jenks, Chief Deputy Clerk
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order
Lansing, Michigan

January 27, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice 129347 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 129347 COA: 252524 Oakland CC: 03-007909-AR RONNIE PRATT MONCRIEF, JR., Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 2, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is cons idered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

C AVANAGH and K ELLY , JJ., would grant leave to appeal.

p0120 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

January 27, 2006

Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                       9,285,928
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  344,059
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            12,948,068
<PP&E>                                       1,608,244
<DEPRECIATION>                                 535,133
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              23,633,853
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,955,623
<BONDS>                                      9,900,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,754
<OTHER-SE>                                   8,773,476
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                23,633,853
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            15,200,635
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               13,051,571
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               174,806
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             708,333
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,038,691
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,247,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            791,691
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   791,691
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .16


</TABLE>
#### Steven M. Cohen, Esq., et al., Respondents, v Allied Fire Protection Systems, Inc., et al., Appellants.

(Appeal No. *11563.)

[832 NYS2d 851]

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Joseph R. Glownia, J.), entered June 19, 2006. The order denied defendants’ motion for leave to amend the answer and to serve a subpoena duces tecum on the Attorney Grievance Committee.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs. Present—Gorski, J.P, Centra, Lunn, Peradotto and Pine, JJ.
This item contains materials that cannot be 

uploaded to the federal docket. A CD containing 

files submitted to EPA with miscellaneous file 

extensions is available by contacting docket staff 

via email at Docket_ORD@epamail.epa.gov