alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

About EDCONTACTS
                - Overview of the law
                - Questions and answers on race discrimination
                - Race discrimination regulation (Title VI)
                - Racial Harassment Resources
                - Resource Comparability Materials
                - Resources related to Limited-English Proficient Students ("English Language Learners")
                - Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) Resources 

|        |
|--------|
|   | Printable view |
|        |

## How Do I Find...

          - Student loans, forgiveness
          - College accreditation
          - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
          - FERPA
          - FAFSA
          - 1098, tax forms

More >

## Information About...

          - Transforming Teaching
          - Family and Community Engagement
          - Early Learning

 

|  |
|--|
|  |
|  | Other Sites |  |
|  |

----

*Our mission*

Student Loans
Repaying LoansDefaulted LoansLoan ForgivenessLoan Servicers

Grants & Programs
Apply for Pell GrantsGrants ForecastApply for a GrantEligibility for Grants

Laws & Guidance
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)FERPACivil RightsNew IDEA Website

Data & Research
Education StatisticsPostsecondary Education DataED Data ExpressNation's Report CardWhat Works Clearinghouse

About Us
Contact UsED OfficesJobsPress ReleasesFAQsRecursos en españolBudget, PerformancePrivacy ProgramSubscribe to E-Mail Updates

----

          - Notices
          - FOIA
          - Privacy Policy
          - Accessibility
          - Security
          - Information quality
          - Inspector General
          - Whitehouse.gov
          - USA.gov
          - Benefits.gov
          - Regulations.gov
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


  

  EXHIBIT
   10(i)

  

 CONSENT OF
   INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’

  

 To the Board of
   Directors of

 Massachusetts Mutual
   Life Insurance Company

  

         We consent to the
   inclusion in this Post-Effective Amendment No. 2 to Registration Statement
   No. 333-45039 on Form N-4 of our report dated February 14, 2000 on our audit
   of the Panorama Premier Segment of Massachusetts Mutual Variable Annuity
   Separate Account 4 as of December 31, 1999 and for the year then ended, and
   of our report dated February 1, 2000, on our audit of the statutory
   financial statements of Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company as of
   December 31, 1999 and for the year then ended, which includes explanatory
   paragraphs relating to the use of statutory accounting practices, which
   differ from generally accepted accounting principles. We also consent to the
   reference to our Firm under the caption “Experts” appearing in the
   Statement of Additional Information.

  

 Deloitte & Touche
   LLP

  

 Hartford,
   Connecticut

 April 24,
   2000
#### Frances McHenry et al., Respondents, v. Long Island Rail Road Company, Appellant.

In a negligence action by a wife and her husband to recover damages for personal injury, loss of services, etc., the defendant appeals: (a) from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered January 8, 1964 after trial, upon a jury’s verdict in favor of the plaintiffs; and (b) from an order of said court, dated December 30, 1963, which denied defendant’s motion to set aside the verdict (CPLR 4404). Judgment and order affirmed, with one bill of costs. No opinion. Kleinfeld, Brennan and Hopkins, JJ., concur; Ughetta, Acting P. J., and Hill, J., dissent and vote to reverse the judgment and to dismiss the complaint, with the following memorandum: In our opinion, plaintiffs failed to establish a prima facie case; they failed to show freedom from contributory negligence or actionable negligence on the part of the defendant (cf. *White*v. *Lehigh Val. R. R. Co.,*220 N. Y. 131; *Goldstein*v. *New York Cent. R. R. Co.,*19 A D 2d 835).
1 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

EASTERN DIVISION

HENRY ESPEJO, individually and on ) 

behalf of all others similarly situated, ) 

) Case No. 1:11-cv-8987 

Plaintiff, ) Related to: Case No. 1:12-cv-4671 

) Case No. 1:12-cv-9431 

v. ) 

) Honorable Charles P. Kocoras 

SANTANDER CONSUMER USA, INC., ) 

an Illinois Corporation, )

) 

 Defendant. ) 

__________________________________________) 

 ORDER 

 This matter coming before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Appointment of Interim 

Co-Lead Counsel, due and adequate notice having been given, and the Court being duly advised 

in the premises, 

 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUGDED, 

1. Plaintiffs’ motion is hereby granted; and, 

2. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(g), Jay Edelson of Edelson McGuire LLC and 

Frank Davis of Davis & Norris LLP are hereby appointed interim co-lead counsel 

in the matters captioned Espejo v. Santander Consumer USA, Inc., No. 1:11-cv8987, Bonner, et al. v. Santander Consumer USA, Inc., No. 1:12-cv-9431, 

Humphreys v. Santander Consumer USA, Inc., No. 1:12-cv-4671. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

ENTERED: January 10, 2013 

 HONORABLE CHARLES P. KOCORAS 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case: 1:11-cv-08987 Document #: 44 Filed: 01/10/13 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:406
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

 )

Sonia Falk, )

Plaintiff ) Case No: 12 C 1384

)

v. )

) Judge: Ruben Castillo

Kane County Sheriff, et al. )

Defendant )

)

ORDER

Motion hearing held on 7/17/2013. Defendant Wells Fargo Bank failed to appear. Plaintiff’s

motion for judgment on damages against defendant Wells Fargo Bank [60] is granted. Judgment

is entered in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant, Wells Fargo Bank in the total

amount of $128,000.

(T:) 0:05

Date: 7/17/2013 /s/ 

Case: 1:12-cv-01384 Document #: 63 Filed: 07/17/13 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:246
Exhibit 32
 
 Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 (18 U.S.C. 1350)
 
 Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) the undersigned General Partners of TASA Products Limited, a Washington limited partnership (the "Company"), do hereby certify, to the best of such General Partner's knowledge and belief, that:
 
 1. The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the "Form 10-K) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 2. The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 /s/MICHEL E. MAES
/s/JAMES R. STEFFEYMichel E. Maes
James R. SteffeyCo-General Partner
Co-General PartnerDate: 3-16-10
Date: 3-16-10
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 11 (Tuesday, January 19, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 5225]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-00985]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; 
Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive 
and Kidney Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; The NIDDK KUH Training 
Grants Review Committee.
    Date: February 10, 2021.
    Time: 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Two Democracy Plaza, 6707 
Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Video Meeting).
    Contact Person: Xiaodu Guo, M.D., Ph.D. Scientific Review 
Officer, Review Branch, DEA, NIDDK, National Institutes of Health, 
6707 Democracy Boulevard, Room 7023 Bethesda, MD 20892-5452 (301) 
594-4719 <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f69183998eb6938e828497d8989f92929dd8989f9ed8919980"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="274052485f67425f53554609494e43434c09494e4f09404851">[email protected]</span></a>

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.847, 
Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolic Research; 93.848, Digestive 
Diseases and Nutrition Research; 93.849, Kidney Diseases, Urology 
and Hematology Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 12, 2021.
Miguelina Perez,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2021-00985 Filed 1-15-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Lila Kerr, Respondent, v. Clifton Fine Hospital et al., Appellants, and St. Lawrence County Department of Social Welfare, Respondent. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.

— As against appellants’ medical evidence and their contentions, first, that there was no disability after December 11, 1957 attributable to the first accident and, second, that there was no substantial evidence supportive of the board’s allocation of the disability, the board was entitled to accept the finding by the treating osteopath of continuing disability attributable to both accidents and the opinion of the board’s examining physician that claimant has a permanent .partial disability, attributable two thirds to the first accident and one third to the second; and we are unable to account the evidence thus accepted as less than substantial. Decision unanimously affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s -Compensation Board. Present — Bergan, P. J., Coon, Gibson, Herlihy and Reynolds, JJ.
# November 2022 FOIA Log
III 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 31 

Authorizing the use of the rotunda of the Capitol for a ceremony to award 

the Congressional Gold Medal to Bob Dole. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 20 (legislative day, DECEMBER 19), 2017 

Mr. ROBERTS submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 

considered and agreed to 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Authorizing the use of the rotunda of the Capitol for a 

ceremony to award the Congressional Gold Medal to 

Bob Dole. 

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives 

2 concurring), 

3 SECTION 1. USE OF THE ROTUNDA OF THE CAPITOL FOR 

4 CEREMONY TO AWARD THE CONGRESSIONAL 

5 GOLD MEDAL TO BOB DOLE. 

6 (a) AUTHORIZATION.—The rotunda of the Capitol is 

7 authorized to be used on January 17, 2018, for a cere8 mony to award the Congressional Gold Medal to Bob Dole. 

9 (b) PREPARATIONS.—Physical preparations for the 

10 conduct of the ceremony described in subsection (a) shall 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•SCON 31 ATS 

1 be carried out in accordance with such conditions as may 

2 be prescribed by the Architect of the Capitol. 

Æ 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

NICK PEARSON, FRANCISCO 

PADILLA, CECILIA LINARES, 

AUGUSTINA BLANCO, ABEL 

GONZALEZ, and RICHARD JENNINGS, 

On Behalf of Themselves and All Others 

Similarly Situated,

Plaintiffs,

v.

NBTY, INC., a Delaware corporation; and 

REXALL SUNDOWN, INC., a Florida 

corporation; and TARGET 

CORPORATION, a Minnesota 

Corporation,

Defendants.

Case No.: 11 CV 07972

CLASS ACTION

Judge James B. Zagel

NOTICE OF MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY

APPROVAL OF CLASS SETTLEMENT

To: All Parties and Their Attorneys of Record:

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on Thursday May 16, 2013 at 9:30 a.m. or as soon thereafter as

counsel may be heard, counselshall appear before the Honorable James B. Zagel, in courtroom 2503, 219

South Dearborn Street, the courtroom usually occupied by him, and shall then and there present Plaintiffs’

Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Settlement, a copy of which is attached hereto.

DATED: May 7, 2013 s/ Stewart M. Weltman 

STEWART M. WELTMAN LLC

53 W. Jackson Suite 364

Chicago, Illinois 60604

Telephone: (312) 588-5033

(Of Counsel Levin Fishbein Sedran & Berman)

Case: 1:11-cv-07972 Document #: 76 Filed: 05/07/13 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:580
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned hereby certifies that on this 7th day of May, 2013, a copy of the foregoing

NOTICE OF MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS SETTLEMENT was filed with

the Clerk of Court using the CMM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing to the

following:

Kara L. Mcall

Sidley Austin LLP 

One South Dearborn Street 

Chicago, IL 60603

Counsel for Defendant Target Corporation

s/Stewart M. Weltman 

One of Plaintiff’s Attorneys

Case: 1:11-cv-07972 Document #: 76 Filed: 05/07/13 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:581
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                                           <C>                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              12-MOS             12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                     JUN-30-2000        JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                        JUL-01-1999        JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                          JUN-30-2000        JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                    507,382            335,603
<SECURITIES>                               18,823<F1>         18,823<F1>
<RECEIVABLES>                             340,177            108,913
<ALLOWANCES>                                    0                  0
<INVENTORY>                                 9,259<F2>          9,770<F2>
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          875,641            473,109
<PP&E>                                  2,942,712          2,309,566
<DEPRECIATION>                         (1,520,589)        (1,280,305)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          2,609,824          1,783,631
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     793,414            439,735
<BONDS>                                         0                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           0                  0
<PREFERRED>                               (36,833)<F3>       (28,000)<F3>
<COMMON>                                6,044,339          5,977,558
<OTHER-SE>                             (4,191,096)<F4>    (4,686,665)<F4>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            2,609,824          1,783,631
<SALES>                                 1,270,825          1,171,995
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        1,440,579          1,316,877
<CGS>                                     100,221             78,971
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             922,010            986,627
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                0                  0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                0                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              0                  0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           518,569            330,250
<INCOME-TAX>                              (23,000)                 0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             0                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                  0                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 0                  0
<CHANGES>                                       0                  0
<NET-INCOME>                              495,569            330,250
<EPS-BASIC>                                   .09                .06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 .09                .06
<FN>
<F1> PRECIOUS METALS
<F2> PREPAID EXPENSE
<F3> DEFERRED COMPENSATION
<F4> RETAINED EARNINGS (DEFICIT)
</FN>



</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 31.1
  CERTIFICATIONS
  I, Geoffrey Talbot, certify that:
  1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Statmon Technologies Corp., Inc.
  2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
  3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
  4.  The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
  (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
  (b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
  (c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and
  5.  The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
  (a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
  (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over financial reporting.
  Date: September 13, 2004
  /s/ **Geoffrey P. Talbot****Geoffrey P. Talbot**Chief Executive Officer
Case: 1:12-cv-03233 Document #: 241-1 Filed: 07/14/16 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:5601
Case: 1:12-cv-03233 Document #: 241-1 Filed: 07/14/16 Page 2 of 5 PageID #:5602
Case: 1:12-cv-03233 Document #: 241-1 Filed: 07/14/16 Page 3 of 5 PageID #:5603
Case: 1:12-cv-03233 Document #: 241-1 Filed: 07/14/16 Page 4 of 5 PageID #:5604
Case: 1:12-cv-03233 Document #: 241-1 Filed: 07/14/16 Page 5 of 5 PageID #:5605
#### 19.802 Determining eligibility for the 8(a) program.

Determining the eligibility of a small business to be a participant in the 8(a) program is the responsibility of the SBA. SBA's regulations on eligibility requirements for participation in the 8(a) program are found at 13 CFR 124.101 through 124.112. SBA designates the concern as an 8(a) participant in the Dynamic Small Business Search (DSBS) at *https://web.sba.gov/pro-net/search/dsp_dsbs.cfm*. SBA's designation also appears in the System for Award Management (SAM).

[82 FR 4727, Jan. 13, 2017, as amended at 88 FR 9738, Feb. 14, 2023]
#### 2132.617 Contract clause.

The clause at FAR 52.232-17 is modified in FEGLI Program contracts to exclude the parenthetical phrase “(net of any applicable tax credit under the Internal Revenue Code (26 U.S.C. 1481)).”
#### Town of Grantville, for use, etc., *v.*Fidelity & Deposit Co.

February 26, 1913.

Complaint. Before Judge Bell. Fulton superior court. .October 24, 1911.

*Dodd & Dodd,*for plaintiff. *Leonard Haas,*for defendant.

Him,. J.

Under the facts of this case it is controlled by the ruling in the case of *Town of Grantville*v. *Fidelity*& *Deposit Co.,*139 *Ga.*53 (76 S. E. 575); and therefore the court below did not err in sustaining the demurrer to the petition.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
#### Ethel Lewis et al., Appellants, v State of New York, Respondent.

(Claim No. 57736.)

— Appeal from an order of the Court of Claims, entered May 16, 1975, which granted defendant’s motion to dismiss the claim. The instant claim was previously before this court and the pertinent facts are set forth in *Lewis v State of New York*(60 AD2d 675). In our earlier decision we reversed the order of the Court of Claims and ruled that the claim should be accepted by the State as a permissible late filing. Subsequently, after *Matter of Beary v City of Rye*(44 NY2d 398) was handed down by the Court of Appeals, we overruled in *Sessa v State of New York*(63 AD2d 334), our position in *Lewis (supra)*relative to the retrospective application of subdivision 6 of section 10 of the Court of Claims Act, and we thereafter granted the State’s motion to reargue this appeal with regard to the effect thereon of our decision in *Sessa (supra).*We now hold that the order appealed from should be affirmed. It is uncontested that the instant tort claim accrued on October 19, 1972 and that claimants’ notice of intention to file a claim was filed one day late on January 18, 1973, 91 days after the accrual of the claim (Court of Claims Act, § 10, subd 3). Pursuant to former subdivision 5 of section 10 of the Court of Claims Act in effect until August 31, 1976, claimants then had until October 19, 1974, two years after the accrual of their claim, to move for permission to file a late claim and yet they took no action until April 28, 1975. Even on this latter date they failed to move specifically for permission to file late and instead sought to amend the claim so as to allege an accrual date later than what is now conceded to be the correct date, October 19, 1972. Under these circumstances it is clear that the applicable Statute of Limitations had run on the instant claim as of October 19, 1974 and that, with the passing of this date, the claim had passed beyond the court’s discretionary power of judicial recall (see *Matter of Beary v City of Rye, supra).*In effect, claimants conceded that this was the situation when, as noted above, they moved on April 28, 1975 to amend their claim rather than for permission to file a late claim. Such being the case, in accordance with our decision in *Sessa (supra),*subdivision 6 of section 10 of the Court of Claims Act with a much later effective date of September 1, 1976 cannot be retrospectively applied to revive the claim, which was, accordingly, properly dismissed as untimely. (See, also, *Paul v State of New York,*66 AD2d 908; *De Cicco v State of New York,*65 AD2d 653; *Fuoco v State of New York,*64 AD2d 1030.) Order affirmed, without costs. Greenblott, J. P., and Main, J., concur.

Mikoll and Herlihy, JJ.,

concur in the following memorandum by Herlihy, J. Herlihy, J. (concurring). We would adhere to our dissent in *Sessa v State of New York*(63 AD2d 334, 336 *et seq.).*We feel constrained to affirm, however, because of the majority opinion in *Sessa.*
#### 1807.7201 Definitions.

*Class of contracts* means a grouping of acquisitions, either by dollar value or by the nature of supplies and services to be acquired.

*Contract opportunity* means planned new contract awards exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT).

[61 FR 47068, Sept. 6, 1996, as amended at 80 FR 36720, June 26, 2015]
2109.409 Certification and contract clause. ( a ) The contracting officer may require the precontract certificate in 2152.209-70 to be filed prior to or during negotiations.
( b ) The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 2152.209-71 in all FEGLI Program contracts.