alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Wright, administratrix, *v.*Clark, administrator.

November 18, 1912.

Appeal. Before Judge Hammond. Burke superior court. October 2, 1911.

*Milton G. Barwick*and *E. L. Brinson,*for plaintiff in error.

Atkinson, J,

1. While the statute provides that «courts of ordinary shall sit on the first Monday of each month (Civil Code, § 4809), it is further provided that such courts, when the business of the court requires it, may adjourn to such times as the ordinary may think proper (Civil Code, § 4811) ; and it appearing in the record that the judgment from which an appeal was taken in this 'case was rendered on a day later than the first Monday in the month, the court of ordinary being a court of general jurisdiction, it will be presumed, in the absence of anything to the contrary, that the term of court was lawfully in session on the day judgment was rendered.

2. It appearing from the date of the judgment in the court of ordinary, as shown by the record, that the judgment appealed from was rendered on the 23d day of March, 1911, and that the appeal was entered on the same date, it was error to dismiss the appeal on the sole ground that it had not been taken in time. Civil Code, § 4999. ' .

*Judgment reversed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-7588 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

WILLIE EDWARD HOPKINS, III, a/k/a W. E.

Hopkins, a/k/a Bill Hopkins, a/k/a Willie

Hopkins, a/k/a Little Bill, a/k/a Bill, Jr.,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District

Judge. (CR-97-9-2-3)

Submitted: February 19, 2004 Decided: February 26, 2004

Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Willie Edward Hopkins, III, Appellant Pro Se. Fernando Groene,

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Newport News, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Willie Edward Hopkins, III, appeals the district court’s

orders denying relief on his motion seeking a reduction of his

sentence. Our review of the record discloses no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. See Hopkins v. United States, No. CR-97-9-2-3 (E.D. Va.

Aug. 7, 2003 & Sept. 30, 2003). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### The People of the State of New York, Plaintiff, v. James Williams, Defendant.

In a *coram nobis*proceeding, motion by defendant to dispense with printing and for other relief, denied with leave to renew upon proof that defendant has timely served upon the District Attorney of Kings County and has timely filed in the office of the Clerk of the Supreme Court, Kings Comity, a notice of appeal from the order which was entered denying the *coram nobis*application. It appears that at the time this motion was made the order had neither been entered nor a. notice of appeal served or filed. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Christ, Brennan, Hill and Rabin, JJ., concur.
# Legend

# Calculations
January 17, 1975.

M. P. No. 74-298.

#### William Murphy *v.*James W. Mullen, *Warden.*

*Bevilacqua & Cicilline, John F. Cicilline,*for petitioner. *Julius C. Michaelson,*Attorney General, *Donald P. Ryan,*Asst. Attorney General, for respondent.

Treating this petition for writ of habeas corpus as a petition for writ of certiorari, the petition is granted without prejudice to the right of the State to renew its objection that the issue sought to be argued should first be raised in the Superior Court under the post conviction relief provisions found in P. L. 1974, ch. 220.

Paolino, J. not participating.
#### Roderick *W.*Cash, Respondent, v. Garden City Company et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

In an action pursuant to article 15 of the Real Property Law, to compel the determ:..ution of claims to real property, certain of the defendants appeal from so much of an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supi-eme Court, Nassau County, entered December 7, 1962, as granted *738plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment as against them (to the extent specified in such judgment) and struck out their answer and dismissed their counterclaim. Order and judgment, insofar as appealed from, reversed, with one bill of $10 costs and disbursements, and motion denied. In our opinion, issues of fact exist which require a trial of this action. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld, Brennan, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur. [38 Misc 2d 1054.]
#### Geoffrey Druce, Appellant, v Robert P. Whalen, as Commissioner of Health of the State of New York, Respondent.

— Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, entered June 2, 1978, dismissing appellant’s petition in an article 78 proceeding to review and set aside an order of respondent, Commissioner of Health of the State of New York, which directed that (1) appellant, a medical doctor, be fined $6,500, (2) the Bureau of Narcotic Controlled Substances withhold the issuance of official New York State prescriptions for which application has been or will be made by appellant, (3) any previously issued oficial New York State prescriptions be canceled and surrendered, and (4) copies of various papers be forwarded to the Board for Professional Medical Conduct, unanimously modified, on the law, without costs or disbursements, to grant the petition only to the extent of remanding to respondent to fix a time period during which official New York State prescriptions shall be withheld from appellant and otherwise affirmed. The evidence adduced at the hearing amply justified the hearing officer, and the respondent, in concluding that appellant, a medical doctor, violated varied provisions of sections 3304 and 3331 of the Public Health Law, and regulations issued thereunder with regard to prescribing and dispensing controlled substances. The cumulative effect of the violations clearly merits substantial punishment, and respondent had an ample basis for imposing a fine, for requiring surrender of unused official New York State prescriptions issued to appellant, and for directing that papers associated with the hearing, including the transcript, be forwarded to the Board for Professional Medical Conduct. However, the further direction to the Bureau of Narcotic Controlled Substances that official New York State prescriptions be withheld from appellant, apparently without any time limitation, seems to us clearly excessive. The effect of such a permanent disqualification would be to make it extremely difficult if not impossible for appellant to practice his profession. (Cf. *Schaubman v Blum,*66 AD2d 676.) We believe that there should be a fixed time limitation with respect to that order and remand to respondent for that purpose. Concur — Fein, J. P., Sandler, Sullivan, Lane and Silverman, JJ.
# February FOIA Log
201.304 Agency control and compliance procedures. Departments and agencies and their component organizations may issue acquisition regulations as necessary to implement or supplement the FAR or DFARS. ( 1 ) ( i ) Approval of the USD(A&S) is required before including in a department/agency or component supplement, or any other contracting regulation document such as a policy letter or clause book, any policy, procedure, clause, or form that— ( A ) Has a significant effect beyond the internal operating procedures of the agency; or
( B ) Has a significant cost or administrative impact on contractors or offerors.
( ii ) Except as provided in paragraph (2) of this section, the USD(A&S) has delegated authority to the Principal Director, Defense Pricing, Contracting, and Acquisition Policy (DPCAP) to approve or disapprove the policies, procedures, clauses, and forms subject to paragraph (1)(i) of this section.
( 2 ) In accordance with 41 U.S.C. 1304, a new requirement for a certification by a contractor or offeror may not be included in a department/agency or component procurement regulation unless— ( i ) The certification requirement is specifically imposed by statute; or
( ii ) Written justification for such certification is provided to the Secretary of Defense by USD(A&S), and the Secretary of Defense approves in writing the inclusion of such certification requirement.
( 3 ) Contracting activities must obtain the appropriate approval (see 201.404) for any class deviation (as defined in FAR subpart 1.4) from the FAR or DFARS, before its inclusion in a department/agency or component supplement or any other contracting regulation document such as a policy letter or clause book.
( 4 ) Each department and agency must develop and, upon approval by USD(A&S)DPCAP, implement, maintain, and comply with a plan for controlling the use of clauses other than those prescribed by FAR or DFARS. Additional information on department and agency clause control plan requirements is available at PGI 201.304(4).
( 5 ) Departments and agencies must submit requests for the Secretary of Defense, USD(A&S), and OUSD(A&S)DPCAP approvals required by this section through the Director of the DAR Council. Procedures for requesting approval of department and agency clauses are provided at PGI 201.304(5).
( 6 ) The Principal Director, DPCAP publishes changes to the DFARS in the Federal Register at *https://www.federalregister.gov* and on the DPCAP website at *https://www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/dars/change_notices.html .* Each change includes an effective date. Unless guidance accompanying a change states otherwise, contracting officers must include any new or revised clauses, provisions, or forms in solicitations issued on or after the effective date of the change.
[56 FR 36284, July 31, 1991, as amended at 60 FR 61591, Nov. 30, 1995; 63 FR 11528, Mar. 9, 1998; 64 FR 39430, July 22, 1999; 65 FR 6552, Feb. 10, 2000; 68 FR 7439, Feb. 14, 2003; 76 FR 58137, Sept. 20, 2011; 77 FR 35879, June 15, 2012; 80 FR 36718, June 26, 2015; 88 FR 73235, Oct. 25, 2023; 89 FR 60830, July 29, 2024]
#### 2001.603 Selection, appointment, and termination of appointment.

The Director, Division of Contracts and Property Management, is authorized by the Director, Office of Administration, to select and appoint contracting officers and to terminate their appointment as prescribed in FAR 1.603. Delegations of contracting officer authority are issued by memorandum which includes a clear statement of the delegated authority, including responsibilities and limitations in addition to the “Certificate of Appointment”, SF 1402. The Director, Division of Contracts and Property Management, may delegate micro-purchase authority in accordance with agency procedures. This delegation may be accomplished by written memorandum. (ref. FAR 1.603-3(b))
Exhibit 32(a)








CERTIFICATION
FURNISHED PURSUANT TO




18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,




AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q of Progress Energy, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ending
March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the “Report”), I, William D. Johnson, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)           the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)           the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.











/s/ William D.
Johnson


William
D. Johnson


Chairman,
President and Chief Executive Officer


May 8,
2009








This
certification is being furnished and shall not be deemed filed by the Company
for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
or incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, or the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
Disclaimer

### State Department of Education

Georgia Department of Education205 Jesse Hill Jr. Drive, SEAtlanta, GA 30334-5001Phone: (404) 656-2800Toll-Free: (800) 311-3627 GA residents onlyFax: (404) 651-8737Website: http://www.gadoe.org

### State Higher Education Agency

Nonpublic Postsecondary Education Commission2082 East Exchange PlaceSuite 220Tucker, GA 30084-5305Phone: (770)414-3300Website: https://gnpec.georgia.gov/

### Special Education Agency

Georgia Department of EducationDivision for Special Education Services and Supports205 Jesse Hill Jr. Drive SEAtlanta, GA 30334Phone: (404) 651-6457Fax: (404) 651-6457Website: http://www.gadoe.org/Curriculum-Instruction-and-Assessment/Special-Education-Services/Pages/default.aspx

### State Adult Education Agency

Technical College System Of GeorgiaAdult Education Programs1800 Century Place, NESuite 300Atlanta, GA 30345 Phone: (404) 679-1635Fax: (404) 679-1647Website: https://tcsg.edu/adult-education/

Back to state map
#### Beatrice M. McCarroll et al. *v.*Tatiana Selinger

*Leon S. Soroker,*for the appellee (defendant).

*Joseph Shelnits,*for the appellants (plaintiffs).

Argued November 5

decided November *5,*1974

The defendant’s motion to dismiss the appeal from the Superior Court in New Haven County is granted.
STATE OF TENNESSEE 

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND CONSERVATION 

DIVISION OF AIR POLLUTION CONTROL 

9TH FLOOR L & C ANNEX 

40 1 CHURCH STREET 

NASHVILLE, TN 37243- 153 1 

July 29,201 1 

Mrs. Gwendolyn Keys Fleming 

Regional Administrator 

U.S. EPA, Region IV 

Atlanta Federal Center, I 2Ih Floor 

61 Forsyth Street, S.W. 

Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960 

#700634500003909 

Return Receipt Reque 

1 4463 

sted 

Subject: Official Submittal Request for State Implementation Plan Revisions to rule 1200-03-09-.O1 Construction 

Pmnits. The majority of the proposed changes are required by the fial rule pertaining to Implementation 

of the New Source Review (NSR) Program for Particulate Matter Less Than 2.5 Micrometers (PM2.5), 

which was published in tlie Feclercd Register on May 16, 2008. 

Dear Mrs. Fleming: 

This is an official submittal request for incorporation into the State Implementation Plan of revisions to rule 1200- 

03-09-.O1 Construction Permits. The majority of the proposed changes are required by the final rule pertaining to 

Implementation of the New Source Review (NSR) Program for Particulate Matter Less Than 2.5 Micrometers 

(PM2.5), which was published in the Fedem1 Regisfcl- on May 16, 2008. 

As required one copy is included with supporting documentation consisting of a certification of a State effective copy 

of Chapter 1200-03-09 with the rule included as State effective. A Board order adopting the rule change, a 

Regulatory Flexibility Addendum, a Impact on Local Governments, Additional Information Required by Joint 

Governlent Operations Conxnittee, and evidence of a public hearing with notices and conunents. Also included is a 

compact disk containing the documents in Microsoft Word and a hard copy of tlie rule showing the language change 

indicated by the strikethrough and redline marks. 

The Environmental Protection Agency is requested to process the enclosed material as part of the federally approved 

State Implenientation Plan. 

If you need further information or documeiitation please contact Malcolm Butler at (615) 532-0600. 

Sincerely, 

PUA;~/~ 

Barry R. Stephens, P.E. 

Technical Secretary 

Tennessee Air Pollution Control Board 

Enclosures 

cc: Mr. R. Scott Davis, Branch Chief
#### 1852.228-80 Insurance—Immunity From Tort Liability.

As prescribed in 1828.311-270(b), insert the following provision:

# Insurance—Immunity From Tort Liability (SEP 2000)

If the offeror is partially or totally immune from tort liability to third persons as a State agency or as a charitable institution, the offeror will include in its offer a representation to that effect. When the successful offeror represented in its offer that it is immune from tort liability, the following clause(s) will be included in the resulting contract:

(a) When the offeror represents that it is partially immune from tort liability to third persons as a State agency or as a charitable institution, the clause at FAR 52.228-7, Insurance—Liability to Third Persons, and the associated NFS clause 1852.228-81, Insurance—Partial Immunity From Tort Liability, will be included in the contract.

(b) When the offeror represents that it is totally immune from tort liability to third persons as a State agency or as a charitable institution. the clause at NFS 1852.228-82 Insurance—Total Immunity From Tort Liability, will be included in the contract.

(End of provision)

[65 FR 54440, Sept. 8, 2000]
WLtoys V303 Auto Pathfinder FPV Drone with GPS + Camera Mount

First Person View (FPV) Display while flying included

With 6-axis system left and right crab flying / hanged flying / 360

Degree rotating / light

GPS auto pilot function

Come home button ready

Low voltage protection (two levels)

Failsafe and self-landing

CF headless mode

PTZ gyro-stabilized

Built-in Gyro: Yes

Remote Control: 2.4GHz Wireless Remote Control, Built-in LCD Display

Channel: 4-Channels

Mode: Mode 2 (Left Hand Throttle)

Size:30.530.518.5cm

Diagonal Wheelbase:37.6cm

Flight time:13-15 Minutes

Maxium Flight weight 925g including camera

1. Zerotech GPS Hold system

2. Altitude hold system

3. CF headless mode

4. 1 touch gohome

5. Failsafe to return home & Landing

6. Low voltage protection

7. Control distance: 500 metres

8. Charging time: 1.5 - 2 hours

9. Flying time: 13 - 15 minutes

10. Battery: 11.1V 2700mAh 25C
### Radon in Ground Water in Seven Counties of Wyoming

By: Melanie L. ClarkCheryl A. Eddy-Miller

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/fs07998

#### Links

- More information:  **USGS Index Page**                            (html)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### United States Agency for Global Media

# AGENCY:

United States Agency for Global Media.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The United States Agency for Global Media (USAGM) announces the members of its SES Performance Review Board (PRB).

# ADDRESSES:

USAGM Office of Human Resources, 330 Independence Ave SW, Washington, DC 20237

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Ellona Fritschie, Business Review Coordinator, at                         *efritschie@usagm.gov*                         or (202) 382-7500.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 4314, USAGM publishes this notice announcing the individuals who will serve as members of the PRB for a term of one year. The PRB is responsible for: (1) Reviewing performance appraisals and ratings of Senior Executive Service and Senior Level members; and (2) making recommendations on other performance management issues, such as pay adjustments, bonuses, and Presidential Rank Awards. The names, position titles, and appointment types of each member of the PRB are set forth below:

1. James Reeves, Chief Information Officer, Career SES

2. Terry Balazs, Director of Technology, Services, and Innovation, Career SES

3. Gary Thatcher, Associate Director for Program Support, Career SES

4. Kelu Chao, Director for Language Programming, Voice of America, Career SES

Dated: January 14, 2021.

Daniel Rosenhotlz,

Attorney-Advisor, Policy Officer, U.S. Agency for Global Media.

[FR Doc. 2021-01360 Filed 1-21-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8610-01-P
Court of Appeals 

First District of Texas 

BILL OF COSTS

No. 01-14-00523-CV

Cintas Corporation No. 2 and Walder A. Morgan 

v.

Charles Lloyd Hinson and wife, Rosa Maria Hinson

NO. 12-CV-1815 IN THE 405TH DISTRICT COURT OF GALVESTON COUNTY

TYPE OF FEE CHARGES PAID/DUE STATUS PAID BY

MT FEE

MT FEE

CLK RECORD

FILING

STATEWIDE EFILING

$10.00

$10.00

$1,106.00

$175.00

$20.00

01/16/2015

10/13/2014

08/01/2014

06/27/2014

06/27/2014

E-PAID

E-PAID

PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

ANT

ANT

ANT

ANT

ANT

The costs incurred on appeal to the First Court of Appeals Houston, Texas are 

$1,321.00.

Court costs in this case have been taxed in this Court’s judgment

I, Christopher A. Prine, Clerk of the Court of Appeals for the First District of Texas, do hereby 

certify that this is a true statement of the costs of appeal in this case.

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, witness my 

hand and the seal of the Court of Appeals for the 

First District of Texas, this April 10, 2015.
**Letter of Credit Data**

*Note: Count reflects the number of LOCs first requested in given year.  Extensions of LOCs are counted only once and included with the most recent amount.  For LOCS paid in installments, each installment is included in the count.*
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

EASTERN DIVISION

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE 

CORPORATION AS RECEIVER FOR 

BROADWAY BANK,

Plaintiff,

v.

DEMETRIS GIANNOULIAS, GEORGE 

GIANNOULIAS, JAMES MCMAHON,

SEAN CONLON, STEVEN DRY, DONNA 

ZAGORSKI, STEVEN BALOURDOS,

GLORIA SGUROS and ANTHONY 

D’COSTA,

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 12 CV 1665 

Judge John F. Grady

Magistrate Judge Daniel Martin

NOTICE OF MOTION

TO: ALL COUNSEL OF RECORD

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on Wednesday July 24, 2013 at 11:00 a.m., we shall 

appear before the Honorable John F. Grady and present Plaintiff Federal Deposit Insurance 

Corporation, as Receiver for Broadway Bank’s, Motion for Leave to Cite Additional Authority, a 

true and correct copy of which was previously served upon you.

Date: July 18, 2013 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Richard H. Tilghman IV

One of the Attorneys for the Federal Deposit 

Insurance Corporation, as Receiver for Broadway

Bank

F. Thomas Hecht

Susan G. Feibus

Dean J. Polales

Richard H. Tilghman IV

UNGARETTI & HARRIS LLP

70 W. Madison Street, Suite 3500

Chicago, IL 60602

312.977.4356

Case: 1:12-cv-01665 Document #: 109 Filed: 07/18/13 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:1691
John Letteri

Counsel, Professional Liability Unit

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

3501 Fairfax Drive

Arlington, VA 22226

(703) 562-2361

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing was served on all counsel of record 

via electronic case filing procedures on July 18, 2013.

/s/ Richard H. Tilghman IV__

Richard H. Tilghman IV

Case: 1:12-cv-01665 Document #: 109 Filed: 07/18/13 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:1692
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Paul Boland, Appellant.

Motion granted and time for argument of appeal enlarged to include March 1961 Term, and case added to March 1961 Term Calendar. Respondent directed to file brief by March 16, 1961.