alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### 2109.408 Certification regarding debarment, suspension, proposed debarment and other responsibility matters.

FAR subpart 9.4 is implemented by changing the FAR offeror's certification at FAR 52.209-5 (which is part of a solicitation) to a pre-contract certificate and a contract clause. These provisions reflect the FEGLI Program's statutory exemption from competitive bidding (5 U.S.C. 8709), which obviates the issuance of solicitations.
212.505 Applicability of certain laws to contracts for the acquisition of COTS items. Commercially available off-the-shelf (COTS) items are a subset of commercial products. Therefore, any laws listed at FAR 12.503, FAR 12.504, 212.503, or 212.504 are also not applicable or modified in their applicability to contracts for the acquisition of COTS items. In addition to the laws listed at FAR 12.505 as specifically not applicable to COTS items, the following laws are not applicable to contracts for the acquisition of COTS items: ( 1 ) 10 U.S.C. 391, Reporting on Cyber Incidents with Respect to Networks and Information Systems of Operationally Critical Contractors and Certain Other Contractors, and 10 U.S.C. 393, Reporting on Penetrations of Networks and Information Systems of Certain Contractors.
( 2 ) Paragraph (a)(1) of 10 U.S.C. 4863, Requirement to buy strategic materials critical to national security from American sources, except as provided at 225.7003-3(b)(2)(i).
( 3 ) Paragraph (a)(1) of 10 U.S.C. 4872, Prohibition on acquisition of sensitive materials from non-allied foreign nations, except as provided at 225.7018-3(c)(1).
[88 FR 80465, Nov. 17, 2023]
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Rita Bloom, Respondent, v. Israel Cohen & Son et al., Appellants, and Special Disability Fund, Respondent. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.

In awarding death benefits in a heart case, the board found that in preparation for his day’s work as a carpenter engaged in lathing on a building construction job, decedent entered the building with his tools (shown to weigh six or seven pounds), “carried them up a flight of steps to the second floor and then descended the steps * * * to get a wooden ‘ horse ’ ” from his car and while reparking his car collapsed and died. The board did not determine the cause of death but found causal relationship nevertheless and stated in the form of a finding, which was, however, meaningless as such: “ Cause of death given as a myocardial infarction The only evidence of myocardial infarction was that afforded by the medical examiner’s certificate of death as “ Myocardial infarction, *old.*Coronary sclerosis ” [emphasis supplied]. Nevertheless, the board obviously accepted as proof of accident an opinion predicated on the supposed occurrence of a *new*injury — a “ coronary occlusion * * * another thrombosis ” — advanced by a physician who, at the same time, conceded that decedent’s underlying condition was of such severity that death could have occurred spontaneously therefrom. There was additional legal error in the finding that “the climbing of steps and the carrying of tools and the return to the car, superimposed on his prior heart pathology was, *in the case of the decedent,*of such unusual strain and exertion as to constitute an accident arising out of and in the course of employment.” (Emphasis supplied.) In reversing an award in a heart case in which the exertion found was excessive only because of decedent’s pre-existing condition, we said, “ Neither is this a case where the usual work might be found to have constituted undue strain in the light of decedent’s condition *(Matter of Sleator*v. *National City Bank,*285 App. Div. 393, affd. 309 N. Y. 708; *Matter of Gioia*v. *Courtmel Co.,*283 App. Div. 40, motion for leave to appeal denied 306 N. Y. 985) as that test is qualified by the condition that ‘ the ordinary course of the work ’ must have been ‘sufficiently strenuous to require more than normal exertion’ *(Matter of Burris*v. *Lewis,*2 N Y 2d 323, 326, citing *Matter of Masse*v. *Robinson Co.,*301 N. Y. 34; *Matter of Ledwith*v. *Birgel & Sons,*3 A D 2d 877).” *842*(Matter of Meit*v. P. *S. & M. Catering Corp.,*5 A D 2d 1024.) The board’s findings upon this record, even without reference to its error in appraising decedent’s strain and exertion as in the light of his particular condition, do not support its determination that an accident occurred. Decision and award reversed and claim dismissed, with costs to appellants against the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Bergan, P. J., Gibson, Herlihy, Reynolds and Taylor, JJ., concur.
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

ROBERT H. GRAY,

Petitioner

v.

SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,

Respondent

______________________

2016-1782

______________________

Petition for review pursuant to 38 U.S.C. Section 502.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

BLUE WATER NAVY VIETNAM VETERANS 

ASSOCIATION,

Petitioner

v.

SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,

Respondent

______________________

2016-1793

______________________

Petition for review pursuant to 38 U.S.C. § 502.
2 GRAY v. SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS

______________________

Before PROST, Chief Judge, DYK and O’MALLEY, Circuit

Judges.

PER CURIAM.

O R D E R

In the above-captioned cases, the Supreme Court of the 

United States granted certiorari, vacated the judgments of 

this court, and remanded with instruction to dismiss the 

cases as moot.

Accordingly, 

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The mandates issued on March 28, 2018 are 

hereby recalled, the judgments rendered on November 16, 2017 are vacated, and the appeals 

are reinstated.

(2) The appeals are dismissed as moot. The mandates shall reissue forthwith. 

 FOR THE COURT

 August 7, 2019 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

 Date Peter R. Marksteiner

 Clerk of Court
Publications

Table 3. Electrofishing effort, number of northern squawfish removed, and number of coded-wire tags recovered from the digestive tracts of northern squawfish, release site study, 1991.

a CWT = coded wire tag (Agency/Data 1/Data 2 codes). Number of CWTs recovered in the digestive tracts of northern squawfish represent a minimum number of juvenile salmon ingested.b Mean effort per sampling period for each location (see Appendix Table B1). c Location codes (2 characters): TC = Tanner Creek transect area; other Columbia River transect areas, where, 1st character, O = Oregon shoreline, and W = Washington shoreline; 2nd character, 1-4, transect areas (refer to Figure 3 for precise locations). d CPUE = catch per unit effort, number of fish caught per hour (Appendix Table B1).e CWT code = 07/14/16, released 24 June.f CWT code = 07/46/49, released 24 June. 

Use your browser's BACK button to return to the text.

Table of Contents
| 1.  | the Form 10-Q, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 5, 2010 (“accompanied report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                             |
| 2.  | the information contained in the accompanied report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of Capital Southwest Corporation.                             |

| Date: August 5, 2010 | By:  /s/ Gary L. Martin                   |
|----------------------|-----------------------------------------------------|
|                 | Gary L. Martin, Chairman of the Board and President |
,

J. Sail 

(211)712

34(10

Larry Gene Sewell

TDCJ No. 408290

Clements Unit9601 Spur 591

Amarillo, Tx, 79 107-9606

March 02, 2015

RE: Court of Appeals Number:

Trial Court Case Number:

Style: Marshall, Luis Fernando

V.

05-92-01050-CR

F91-04612-RM

Texas, The State of

I - The case has been submitted and is pending consideration.

2. The Court of Criminal Appeals has jurisdiction over post-conviction writs and

habeas corpus. Please contact the Court of Criminal Appeals for any Forms or

in formation.

3. The Court has no record of an appeal on tile in the above referenced name or trial

court number.

4. Enclosed is a copy of the opinion in your appeal.

5. This Court does not appoint counsel

6. Neither the judges nor the stall of this Court can give legal advice. Therefore, you

may wish to contact your attorney; the trial court; or the State Counsel forOffenders. Texas Department of Criminal Justice, P.O. Box 4005, Huntsville, TX,

77342 for further infbrmation or assistance.
10. Enclosed please find the copies you requested.

x II. The cost for the copies you requested is (to get a copy of opinion will cost $2.00

and any hiture requests will have to be paid for in advance for copies o’ all thedi ftèrent opinions that you are requesting

Respectfully,

Is! Lisa Matz, Clerk of the Court

‘3
p. 1 

# Bio AccuTech Inc. 19 Wilson Way North West Windsor, NJ 08550 Tel : 609-716-9821 Fax : 609-716-9822 February 2, 2011 Document Control Officer (DCO) (7405 M) Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics (OPPT) Environmental Protection Agency 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., N .W . Washington, D.C. 20460-001 1E1 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIII IIII a 33 31'J~ 1

I" r .~F 1 ~ i- t ! t_ 1 { I FEB 15

AT'1N : '1'SCA section 4 Docket number : EPA-HQ-OPPT-2007-00531 Re: Application for Exemption, Section 4Test Rule, Benzophenone CAS No. #119-61-9 Testing of Certain High Volume Chemicals, Federal Register, January 7, 2011 (Volume 76, Number 5) 40 CFRpart 9 and 799 Dear Sir or Madam

: Bio AccuTech Inc submits this application for exemption fromthe requirements for testing Benzophenone CAS No. #119-61-9 under TSCA Section 4Test Rule, Testing of Certain High Volume Chemicals, as noted above. As part ofour exemption application we are providing the following information: (A)The identity of the test rule, the chemical identity, and the CAS No. of the test substance on which the application is based. Testing of Certain High Volume Chemicals, Federal Register, January 7, 2011 (Volume 76, Number 5) 40 CFR part 9 and 799 Benzophenone CAS No. #119-61-9 . (B) `we are rcqueAiilg an exemption frotn ail iesiiiig requirernernt5 lor Benzoplletioiie under 40 CFR 790.87 the test data is unnecessarily burdensome for our small import business located in New Jersey. Further, we believe that this material is already being sponsored for testing (per above) by another party. Our company was informed that a testing consortium will be formed and we will bejoining the testing consortium, which will be conducting testing on this materiai . Therefore, we also write to request to join in the efforts ofthe testing consortium . (C) Name, address, and telephone number ofapplicant. Fiio AccuTech Inc. 19 Wilson Way North West Windsor, NJ 08550 (D) Name, address, and telephone number ofappropriate individual to contact for further information. Michael Yan 

### General Manager CONTAINS N0 CBI BioAccuTech Inc. 

# 6r'r'T- 200'7-053/19 Wilson Way North

West Windsor, NJ 08550 (609) 716-9821 As per 40 CFR 790

.99, BioAccuTech Inc. provides our Statement of financial responsibility per our application for exemption: I (Bio AccuTech Inc.) understand that if this application is granted before the reimbursement period described in section 4(c)(3)(B) of TSCAexpires, Bio AccuTech Inc. must pay fair and equitable reimbursement to the person or persons who incurred or shared in the costs of complying with the requirement to submit data and upon whose data the granting of my application was based. Thank you very much for your time. If you have any further questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me at (609) 716-9821 or by email at michaelyan@bioaccutech .com .
FY 2023 AGENCY FINANCIAL REPORT 207 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

Other Information (Unaudited)

Climate Related Financial Risk

In September 2021, the Department released a new FY 2021 Climate Adaptation Plan. 

With this new plan, the Department acknowledges that climate change is affecting the 

Department’s mission and the need for comprehensive and urgent action to promote 

adaptation and resilience through the Department’s programs and operations. This plan 

builds on the lessons learned from the Department’s past sustainability action plans, 

climate change adaptation plans, and environmental justice plans to offer new actions 

that the Department can undertake to better adapt to climate change and develop agency 

resilience and resilience across the nation’s schools.

The White House currently requires that federal agencies publish various plans and 

reports regarding climate, sustainability, and environmental justice. The Department is 

developing its next Climate Adaptation and Environmental Justice plans, using White 

House guidance. Both are expected to be released in 2024. The most up to date plans and 

reports are posted on the ED Infrastructure and Sustainability page, under Reporting.
#### 1514.404 Rejection of bids.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 5.1.1

Eastern Division

Michelle Holt

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:12−cv−02571

Honorable Thomas M. Durkin

MRS BPO, L.L.C.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Tuesday, April 23, 2013:

 MINUTE entry before Honorable Thomas M. Durkin:Motion for partial summary

judgment [46] is entered and continued. Motion hearing held on 4/23/2013. Responses

due by 5/28/2013. Replies due by 6/11/2013. Status hearing set for 7/30/2013 at 09:00

AM.Mailed notice(srn, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:12-cv-02571 Document #: 47 Filed: 04/23/13 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:317
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R . 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R . 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 96-60842 Conference Calendar

__________________
WILLIAM J. COCKRELL; BILLY H. COCKRELL; CAROLYN V. COCKRELL, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
versus MEMPHIS SHELBY COUNTY AIRPORT AUTHORITY, ET AL., Defendants, MEMPHIS SHELBY COUNTY AIRPORT AUTHORITY, Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 2:95-CV-16-B-B
- - - - - - - - - - August 18, 1997 Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The appellants appeal the district court’s dismissal of their civil rights action for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1). Because their brief fails to address the basis for the district court’s dismissal, theirNo. 96-60842 -2- appeal is dismissed as frivolous. See Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983); see 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2. APPEAL DISMISSED.
**U.S. Department of Education**

**Negotiated Rulemaking**

**1990 K St., NW, 8th Floor Conference Center**

**Washington, D.C.**

**Team II – School-Based Loan Issues**

**Meeting Two**

**April 1, 1:00 pm – 5:00 pm**

**April 2 & 3, 2009, 9:00 am – 5:00 pm**

**Agenda***

**April 1, 2009, 1:00-5:00 pm**

**Welcome**

**Review, Revise, and Approve Meeting One Summary**

**Review Department Response to Proposed Additional Issues**

**Finalize List of Issues to be Negotiated**

**Review Draft Regulatory Text:**

Issue #8: Cohort Default Rate Calculation, Institutional Eligibility, and Default Prevention Plans 

Issue #1: Required Disclosures for Covered Entities

Issue #2: Program Participation Agreement (PPA): Code of Conduct

Issue #3:Disclosures of Reimbursements for Service on Advisory Boards

Issue #4:PPA: Private Education Loan Certification

Issue #5:Information and Dissemination Activities

Issue #6:Exit Counseling

Issue #7:PPA: Preferred Lender Lists

Issue #9:Entrance Counseling 

Issue #12:Expansion of Teacher, Head Start, and Law Enforcement Cancellation Categories

Issue #13: Addition of New Public Service Cancellation Categories

Issue #14: Military Service Cancellation

**April 2, 2009, 9:00 am-5:00 pm**

**Truth-in-Lending Act: Proposed Rules –**

**Presentation by Brent Lattin, Senior Attorney**

**Division of Consumer and Community Affairs, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System**

**Review Draft Regulatory Text (cont’d.)**

**April 3, 2009, 9:00 am-5:00 pm**

**Review Draft Regulatory Text (cont’d.)**

**Next Steps**

Draft Regulatory Text

Agenda for Meeting Three: May 6 - 8, 2009

Meeting Summary

Other

*  Time will be made available for public comment during the meeting.

3/30/2009
204.7403 Contract clauses. ( a ) Use the clause at 252.204-7014, Limitations on the Use or Disclosure of Information by Litigation Support Contractors, in all solicitations and contracts that involve litigation support services, including solicitations and contracts using FAR part 12 procedures for the acquisition of commercial products and commercial services.
( b ) Use the clause at 252.204-7015, Notice of Authorized Disclosure of Information for Litigation Support, in all solicitations and contracts, including solicitations and contracts using FAR part 12 procedures for the acquisition of commercial products and commercial services.
[81 FR 28728, May 10, 2016, as amended at 84 FR 58332, Oct. 31, 2019; 88 FR 6581, Jan. 31, 2023]
#### 1831.205-70 Contract clause.

The contracting officer must insert the clause at 1852.231-70, Precontract Costs, in contracts for which specific coverage of precontract costs is authorized.

[61 FR 55768, Oct. 29, 1996, as amended at 65 FR 46628, July 31, 2000; 69 FR 35271, June 24, 2004]

###### Editorial Note

#### Editorial Note:

At 85 FR 52927, Aug. 27, 2020, 1831.205-70 was amended; however, the amendment could not be incorporated due to inaccurate amendatory instruction.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Wesley Wilfred Green, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant (a) from a judgment of the County Court, Queens County, rendered February 2,1959, convicting him, after a jury trial, of assault in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a third felony offender, to serve a term of 2% to 19 years; and (b) from every intermediate order made in the action. Judgment affirmed. In the absence of any evidence relating to self defense, the charge as given by the trial court was more favorable to the defendant than the charge to which he was entitled. In any event, the errors, if any, did not affect the substantial rights of the defendant and, therefore, may be disregarded (Code Grim. Pro., § 542). No separate appeal lies from the intermediate orders which have been reviewed on the appeal from the judgment of conviction. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Ughetta, Kleinfeld and Christ, JJ., concur.
Case: 1:12-cv-01888 Document #: 1 Filed: 10/27/11 Page 1 of 11 PageID #:1
Case: 1:12-cv-01888 Document #: 1 Filed: 10/27/11 Page 2 of 11 PageID #:2
Case: 1:12-cv-01888 Document #: 1 Filed: 10/27/11 Page 3 of 11 PageID #:3
Case: 1:12-cv-01888 Document #: 1 Filed: 10/27/11 Page 4 of 11 PageID #:4
Case: 1:12-cv-01888 Document #: 1 Filed: 10/27/11 Page 5 of 11 PageID #:5
Case: 1:12-cv-01888 Document #: 1 Filed: 10/27/11 Page 6 of 11 PageID #:6
Case: 1:12-cv-01888 Document #: 1 Filed: 10/27/11 Page 7 of 11 PageID #:7
Case: 1:12-cv-01888 Document #: 1 Filed: 10/27/11 Page 8 of 11 PageID #:8
Case: 1:12-cv-01888 Document #: 1 Filed: 10/27/11 Page 9 of 11 PageID #:9
Case: 1:12-cv-01888 Document #: 1 Filed: 10/27/11 Page 10 of 11 PageID #:10
Case: 1:12-cv-01888 Document #: 1 Filed: 10/27/11 Page 11 of 11 PageID #:11
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES 

July 6, 2020 

Honorable Racquel Berry-Benjamin 

Commissioner of Education 

Virgin Islands Department of Education 

1834 Kongens Gade 

St. Thomas, Virgin Islands 00802 

racquel.berry@vide.vi 

Dear Commissioner Berry-Benjamin: 

This letter grants final approval under Section 421(b) of the General Education Provisions Act 

for grant award H027A180004. 

The Department received your June 8, 2020 request on behalf of the Virgin Islands Department

of Education for a waiver extending the period of availability for Federal fiscal year (FFY) 2018 

Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) Part B grant award funds. 

With this approval, the FFY 2018 IDEA Part B grant award funds will be available for obligation 

through September 30, 2021 and may be liquidated through December 30, 2021. 

Please contact your Office of Special Education Programs State Lead, Susan Kauffman, at 

Susan.Kauffman@ed.gov if you have any questions. 

Sincerely, 

/s/

Mark Schultz 

Commissioner, Rehabilitation Services Administration.

Delegated the authority to perform the functions and duties 

of the Assistant Secretary for the Office of Special 

Education and Rehabilitative Services.

cc: State Director 

400 MARYLAND AVE. S.W., WASHINGTON, DC 20202-2600 

www.ed.gov 

The Department of Education’s mission is to promote student achievement and preparation for global competitiveness 

by fostering educational excellence and ensuring equal access.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-2139

DELICIA ULRICH YANGHAT MBOUMBA,

Petitioner,

v.

MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals. 

Submitted: July 31, 2008 Decided: August 29, 2008

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Peter Nyoh, LAW OFFICES OF PETER NYOH, Silver Spring, Maryland, for

Petitioner. Jeffrey S. Bucholtz, Acting Assistant Attorney

General, M. Jocelyn Lopez Wright, Assistant Director, Kristin K.

Edison, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for

Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Delicia Ulrich Yanghat Mboumba, a native and citizen of

the Republic of Congo, seeks review of an order of the Board of

Immigration Appeals (Board) denying her untimely motion to reopen

removal proceedings. We have reviewed the record and Mboumba’s

claims and conclude that the Board did not abuse its discretion in

denying Mboumba’s motion. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2), (3) (2008).

We accordingly deny the petition for review. We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED