alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### 2009.570-7 Conflicts identified after award.

If potential organizational conflicts of interest are identified after award with respect to a particular contractor and the contracting officer determines that conflicts do exist and that it would not be in the best interest of the Government to terminate the contract, as provided in the clauses required by 2009.570-5, the contracting officer shall take every reasonable action to avoid, eliminate, or, after obtaining a waiver in accordance with 2009.570-9, neutralize the effects of the identified conflict.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
              PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Larry C. Miller, Vice President-Finance and Chief Financial Officer of Butler
Manufacturing Company, certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1)    The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period
       ended June 30, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements
       of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (15
       U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
       respects, the financial condition, and results of operations of the
       Company

August 14, 2003                                    /s/ Larry C. Miller
---------------                                    ---------------------------
Dated                                              Larry C. Miller
                                                   Vice President - Finance,
                                                   and Chief Financial Officer

  A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN
  PROVIDED TO BUTLER MANUFACTURING COMPANY AND WILL BE RETAINED BY THE COMPANY
  AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON
  REQUEST.
Exhibit 32(f)








CERTIFICATION
FURNISHED PURSUANT TO




18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,




AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q of Florida Power Corporation (the “Company”) for the period ending
March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the “Report”), I, Mark F. Mulhern, Senior Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:




(1)           the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)           the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.











/s/ Mark F.
Mulhern


Mark F.
Mulhern


Senior
Vice President and


Chief
Financial Officer


May 8,
2009








This
certification is being furnished and shall not be deemed filed by the Company
for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
or incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, or the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

On September 10, 2020, the Department announced a streamlined waiver for  State Lead Agencies that are also State Educational Agencies (SEAs) a waiver  for the period of availability for the use of IDEA Part C funds. This waiver is  authorized under the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (CARES Act), Pub. L. No. 116-136 (March 27, 2020), the Secretary of Education is  authorized to consider waivers to extend the period of availability for certain  Federal funds. The CARES Act does not authorize the Secretary to consider  waivers from State Lead Agencies that are not SEAs.

----

                  -  ***Waiver Authority for the Period of Availability for Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) Part C Funds for Federal fiscal year (FFY) 2018***PDF (297KB) 
                  ***Request Form for Part C Waiver***PDF (3.6MB) 

----

Guam | Iowa | Minnesota | Nebraska | Northern Mariana Islands | Oregon | States and TerritoriesGuam-  Guam Part C POA Waiver for 2020 (08/01/2020)PDF (118KB)
Iowa-  Iowa Part C POA Waiver for 2020 (09/29/2020)PDF (142KB)
Minnesota-  Minnesota Part C POA Waiver for 2020 (09/28/2020)PDF (118KB)
Nebraska-  Nebraska Part C POA Waiver for 2020 (10/01/2020)PDF (118KB)
Northern Mariana Islands-  Northern Mariana Islands Part C POA Waiver for 2020 (09/28/2020)PDF (119KB)
Oregon-  Oregon Part C POA Waiver for 2020 (09/28/2020)PDF (391KB)
   Printable view  Last Modified: 12/10/2020How Do I Find...- Student loans, forgiveness
- Higher Education Rulemaking
- College accreditation
- Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
- FERPA
- FAFSA
- 1098, tax forms

More >
Information About...- Elevating Teaching
- Early Learning
- Engage Every Student
- Unlocking Career Success
- Cybersecurity

 
*Our mission* is to promote student achievement and preparation for global competitiveness by fostering educational excellence and ensuring equal access.
Student Loans
Repaying LoansDefaulted LoansLoan ForgivenessLoan Servicers
Grants & Programs
Apply for Pell GrantsGrants ForecastApply for a Grant
Laws & Guidance
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)FERPACivil RightsNew IDEA Website
Data & Research
Education StatisticsPostsecondary Education DataED Data ExpressNation's Report CardWhat Works ClearinghouseOpen Data PlatformCOVID Relief Data
About Us
Contact UsED OfficesJobsPress ReleasesFAQsRecursos en españolBudget, PerformancePrivacy Program- Notices
- FOIA
- Privacy Policy
- Accessibility
- Security
- Information quality
- Inspector General
- Whitehouse.gov
- USA.gov
- Benefits.gov
- Regulations.gov
- vote.gov
115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 44 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives 

2 concurring), That in recognition of the long and distin3 guished service rendered to the Nation by John Sidney 

4 McCain, III, a Senator from the State of Arizona and for5 merly a Representative from that State, his remains be 

6 permitted to lie in state in the rotunda of the Capitol on 

7 August 31 and September 1, 2018, and the Architect of 

8 the Capitol, under the direction of the President pro tem9 pore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Rep10 resentatives, shall take all necessary steps for the accom11 plishment of that purpose. 

Passed the Senate August 27, 2018. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 
115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 44 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Authorizing the use of the rotunda of the Capitol 

Honorable John Sidney McCain, III. for the lying in state of the remains of the late
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

May 12, 2014

No. 04-13-00876-CV

IN THE MATTER OF R.D.,

From the 289th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013-JUV-01230

The Honorable Carmen Kelsey, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The Appellee’s Motion for Extension of Time to file Brief is GRANTED. The appellee’s 

brief is due on June 2, 2014.

_________________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 12th day of May, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Exhibit 21

SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT



|                                             |  |                                      
|-------------------------------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|COMPANY                                      |  | JURISDICTION / STATE OF INCORPORATION
|Team, Inc.                                   |  | Texas                                
|Team, Inc.                                   |  | Delaware                             
|TISI Pipelines Inc.                          |  | Delaware                             
|Team Industrial Services, Inc.               |  | Texas                                
|Team Peak Alaska, LLC (50%)                  |  | Delaware                             
|Team Industrial Services International, Inc. |  | Delaware                             
|TISI Acquisition Inc.                        |  | Canada                               
|TISI Canada Inc.                             |  | Canada                               
|Global Heat U.K. Ltd.                        |  | United Kingdom                       
|TISI VI, LLC                                 |  | USVI                                 
|Team Industrial Services Asia (PTE) Ltd.     |  | Singapore                            
|Team Industrial Services Trinidad, Ltd.      |  | Trinidad, West Indies                
|TISI Trinidad Limited                        |  | Trinidad, West Indies                
|Team Industrial Services, C.V. de S.A.       |  | Venezuela                            
|Team Industrial Services Europe B.V.*        |  | The Netherlands                      
|Leak Repairs Specam B.V.                     |  | The Netherlands                      
|Leak Repairs Specam BVBA.                    |  | Belgium                              
|Team Industrial Services (UK) Limited*       |  | United Kingdom                       
|Teaminc. Europe B.V.                         |  | The Netherlands                      



|* | formed subsequent to year end.
|- | ------------------------------
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Joint operating environment**
 
2007 | 2008 | 2010 | 2016
 
SuDoc Number:D 5.23:
Item Number:0315-A-03 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000678271
 
February 13, 2018
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT TIM OTHY ALLAN DUNLAP, Plaintiff - Appe lla nt, v. DENNIS FR IC K, De fe nda

nt - Appe lle e . No. 15-35225 D.C . No. 1:13-c v-00299-C W D M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the Distric t of Ida

ho C andy W . Da le , M a gistra

te Judge , Pre siding ** Subm itte d June 14, 2016 *** B e fore : B EA, WATFORD, a nd FRIEDLAND, C irc uit Judge s. Idaho sta te prisone r Tim othy

Alla n Dunla p a ppe a l s pro se from

the distric t c ourt’ s sum

m ary judgm e nt in his 42 U.S.C . § 1983 a c tion a lle ging tha t de fe nda nt 

# FIL ED JUN 23 2016 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

rtie s c onse nte d to proc e e d be fore a m a gistra te judge . Se e 28 U.S.C . § 636(c ).

*** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt a nd de nie s Dunla

p’ s re que sts for ora l a

rgum e nt, se t forth in his ope ning brie f a

n d in sepa

rate m otions. Se eFe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).de prive d him of food in viola

tion of theEighth Am e ndm e nt. W e have jurisdic tion unde r 28 U.S.C . § 1291. W e re vie wde novo. Toguc hi v . C hung , 391 F.3d 1051, 1056 (9th C ir. 2004). W e a ffirm . The distric t c ourt prope rly grante d sum

m a ry judgm e nt be c a

use Dunla p fa ile d to ra ise a

ge nuine disputeof m ate ria l fa c t a s to whe the r be ing provide d two m e a ls on we e ke nd da

y s c onstitute d a

suffic ie ntly

se rious depriva

tion unde r the Eighth Am e ndm e nt. Se e Foste r v . Runne ls , 554 F.3d 807, 812, 814 (9th C ir. 2009) (two-pa rt showing re quire d to e sta blish a viola tion of theEighth Am e ndm e nt, inc l uding a

n obje c tive showing tha

t the re wa s a

suffic ie ntly

se rious depriva

tion of the m inim a l c iviliz e d m e a sure of life ’ s ne c e ssitie s); Le Maire v . Maass , 12 F.3d 1444, 1456 (9th C ir. 1993) (“ The Eighth Am e ndm e nt re quire s only tha t prisone rs re c e ive food tha

t is a de quate to m a inta in he a lth.” ). All pe nding m otions a

nd re que sts a

re de n ie d. AFFIRM E D.

1 5 - 3 5 2 2 5 2
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

 FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

JULIAN CHRISTIAN MCINTOSH,

Appellant,

v. Case No. 5D17-3844

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

________________________________/

Opinion filed April 27, 2018

3.850 Appeal from the Circuit 

Court for Orange County,

Alan S. Apte, Judge.

Julian Christian McIntosh,

DeFuniak Springs, pro se.

No Appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Julian Christian McIntosh, appeals the summary denial of his Florida 

Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 post-conviction motion alleging six claims of ineffective 

assistance of counsel. We reverse the portion of the order summarily denying ground 

one and otherwise affirm without discussion.
2

Appellant was charged with three counts: aggravated assault of Jose Barcia, 

aggravated assault of Brittany DeLemos,

1 and possession of a firearm by a convicted 

felon. Prior to trial, the State nolle prossed the charge of aggravated assault against 

Brittany DeLemos, and Appellant was acquitted in a bifurcated jury trial of aggravated 

assault against Jose Barcia. He was convicted as charged, however, following a separate

trial on the count for possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. 

In ground one, Appellant alleges that his counsel was ineffective for failing to call 

Brittany DeLemos at the second trial, claiming that she would have testified that he did 

not possess a firearm. Although Ms. DeLemos’s proffered testimony could have been 

impeached with a prior inconsistent statement, Appellant alleges that she would have 

explained at trial that she lied in her 911 call because, at the time, she was “filled with 

emotions” and “was desperate” to have Appellant out of her house.2 Given our record,

we conclude that Appellant is entitled to an evidentiary hearing on ground one unless the 

trial court on remand is able to attach records conclusively refuting Appellant’s claim. 

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; and REMANDED.

ORFINGER, TORPY and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.

 

1 The record indicates that Brittany DeLemos is also known as Brittany McIntosh. 

2 Appellant attached an affidavit signed by Brittany DeLemos that is consistent with 

his allegations.
EXHIBIT
      32.1





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the annual report on Form 10-KSB of Secured Digital Storage
      Corporation (the “Company”) for the period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with
      the SEC (the “Report”), the undersigned in the capacity and on the date
      indicated below, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
      adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





(1)   The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





This
      written statement is being furnished to the SEC as an exhibit to such Report.
      A
      signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
      provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
      the
      SEC or its staff upon request.





By:
            /s/
                William M. LynesChief
                Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board (Principal Executive
				Officer)April
                15, 2008
Exhibit 21
  COCA-COLA
    BOTTLING CO. CONSOLIDATED
  LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES AS OF JANUARY 2, 2011
  State/Country &Legal Name

Date Inc/Organized

Owned by

Ownership %CCBCC, Inc.


Delaware 
    12/20/93



Consolidated



100
%CCBCC Operations, LLC


Delaware 
    10/15/2003



Consolidated



100
%Chesapeake Treatment Company, LLC


North Carolina 
    6/5/95



Operations



100
%Coca-Cola Ventures, Inc.


Delaware 
    6/17/93



Consolidated



100
%Consolidated Beverage Co.


Delaware 
    1/8/97



Consolidated



100
%Consolidated Real Estate Group, LLC


North Carolina 
    1/4/2000



Consolidated



100
%BYB Brands, Inc.


North Carolina 
    3/8/2006



Consolidated



100
%Data Ventures, Inc.


North Carolina 
    9/25/2006



Consolidated



100
%Heath Oil Co., Inc.


South Carolina 
    9/9/86



Operations



100
%TXN, Inc.


Delaware 
    1/3/90



Data Ventures Inc.



100
%Tennessee Soft Drink Production Company


Tennessee 
    12/22/88



Operations



100
%Piedmont Coca-Cola Bottling Partnership


Delaware 
    7/2/93



CC Ventures



77.326
%CCBC of Wilmington, Inc.


Delaware 
    6/17/93



Piedmont



100
%Swift Water Logistics, Inc.


North Carolina 
    4/24/2006



Consolidated



100
%Data Ventures Europe BV


Netherlands 
    1/23/2007



Data Ventures Inc.



100
%Red Classic Brokerage, LLC


North Carolina 
    9/21/2007



Operations



100
%Equipment Reutilization Solutions, LLC


North Carolina 
    4/12/2010



Operations



100
%Red Classic Services, LLC


North Carolina 
    11/19/2010



Consolidated



100
%Red Classic Equipment, LLC


North Carolina 
    11/19/2010



Red Classic Services



100
%Red Classic Transportation Services, LLC


North Carolina 
    11/19/2010



Red Classic Services



100
%Red Classic Transit, LLC


North Carolina 
    11/19/2010



Red Classic Transportation



100
%Red Classic Contractor, LLC


North Carolina 
    11/19/2010



Red Classic Transportation



100
%Fast Forward Energy, Inc.


Indiana 
    3/10/2006



BYB Brands, Inc.



60
%
#### George A. Libby, Appellant, v. Fred J. Wilkie, Respondent. (Action No. 2.)

Same decision and like cause of action as in case of *Libby*v. *Wilkie*(19 A D 2d 851).
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Axcess International, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this annual report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this annual report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-14 and
15d-14) for the registrant and we have:
 a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidating subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this annual report was prepared;b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures as of the end of the period covered by this annual report (the
Evaluation Date); andc)
    
    presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures based on the required evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
 a)
    
    all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls; and
 6.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I have indicated in this annual report
whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that
could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent
evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and
material weaknesses.
  /s/ ALLAN L. FRANKAllan L. Frank, Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary(Principal Accounting and Financial Officer)
BD Data Sheet E

School Type and Level 	Office of Postsecondary Education	

January 2018	 U.S. Department of Education

The data presented here illustrate the distribution of school type and level associated with borrower defense claims.  The data were compiled by the U.S. Department of Education’s Federal Student Aid (FSA).  Loan data are current as of November 2017, and underlying borrower defense claims are current as of October 2017.

**Table E.1: Claim Counts and Total Loan Balances**

Assumptions

· Claim counts—some claims were not associated with schools or loans.  Therefore, sum of claim counts may be different than the count of distinct claim numbers.

· Loan value:

· Value used was from month prior to that in which the claim was submitted.

· Value is the sum of outstanding principle balance and outstanding interest balance.

· Loan attribution—loans were associated to a claim if they matched on OPEID and on either the loan's borrower Social Security Number (SSN) or student SSN.  When two claims matched to a single loan, the loan data was allocated on the borrower SSN.

· Consolidated loans—were de-consolidated to link them to borrower defense claims.

DRT 1852.5	PUBLIC	1