alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 753 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 753

 To ensure that oil transported through the Keystone XL pipeline into 
the United States is used to reduce United States dependence on Middle 
                              Eastern oil.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 28, 2017

  Mr. Markey introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To ensure that oil transported through the Keystone XL pipeline into 
the United States is used to reduce United States dependence on Middle 
                              Eastern oil.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ENERGY SECURITY.

    (a) In General.--Subject to subsection (b), the Secretary of Energy 
shall ensure that any crude oil and bitumen transported into the United 
States by the Keystone XL pipeline, and all refined petroleum fuel 
products originating from that crude oil or bitumen, will be entered 
into domestic commerce in the United States for--
            (1) use as a fuel; or
            (2) the manufacture of another product.
    (b) Waivers Authorized.--The President may waive the requirement 
described in subsection (a) if--
            (1) the President determines that a waiver is in the 
        national interest because it--
                    (A) will not lead to an increase in domestic 
                consumption of crude oil or refined petroleum products 
                obtained from countries hostile to United States 
                interests or with political and economic instability 
                that compromises energy supply security;
                    (B) will not lead to higher costs to refiners who 
                purchase the crude oil than the refiners would pay for 
                crude oil in the absence of the waiver; and
                    (C) will not lead to higher gasoline costs to 
                consumers than consumers would pay in the absence of 
                the waiver;
            (2) an exchange of crude oil or refined product provides 
        for no net loss of crude oil or refined product consumed 
        domestically; or
            (3) a waiver is necessary under the Constitution, a law, or 
        an international agreement.
                                 <all>
```
ONS, STATES, AND HEALTH SERVICE AREAS

bark ses feeslee <1 oi
ad ale Vt
a tA [=

Region
State
Health Service Area
## *A r c h i v e d  I n f o r m a t i o n*

# MARSHALL S. SMITHUNDER SECRETARY

Marshall (Mike) S. Smith has been the Under Secretary of the Department since 1993. As Under Secretary, Smith has been a key player in helping define the Administration's education agenda, which focuses on the need to raise educational achievement for all students and increase their opportunities to pursue postsecondary education and lifelong learning. He directed the development of the Goals 2000: Educate America Act, the Improving America's Schools Act, and the School-to-Work Opportunities Act -- landmark legislation that became law with strong bipartisan support in Congress. 

He led the Administration's efforts to pass the Student Loan Reform Act, which created the Direct Student  Loan Program. He also conceptualized and directed the transformation of the Office of Student Financial Assistance into the first performance-based organization (PBO) in the federal government.

As Under Secretary, Smith has helped define a new federal role in American education -- one in which the federal government serves as a supportive partner to local districts and states as they seek to carry out standards-based reforms. He has advanced the idea that all students can benefit from higher standards and challenging curricula. He has stressed that intensive, sustained professional development for teachers and principals is essential to successful education reform. He has advocated the idea of flexibility for schools and teachers so that they can improve teaching and learning, coupled with greater accountability for student performance. And he has emphasized the importance of strong partnerships among parents, schools, communities, higher education, and business.

Smith's published writings cover a wide range of issues, including desegregation, early childhood programs, effective schools, and the effect of federal policies on state and local practice. In the late 1980's and early 1990's, he articulated a framework for standards-based school reform. His recent interests have focused on the education of children at risk of school failure and turning around low-performing schools. 

Prior to his appointment as Under Secretary, Smith was a professor of education and Dean of the Graduate School of Education at Stanford University. Previously, he was an associate professor at Harvard Graduate School of Education and a professor at the University of Wisconsin at Madison, where he also served as the Director of the Wisconsin Center for Education Research.

Smith earned both a master's (1963) and a doctoral (1970) degree in measurement and statistics from the Harvard Graduate School of Education. Smith has held several policy positions in the federal government prior to his current post, including serving as Chief of Staff to the first Secretary of Education. He has served as an adviser to the National Education Goals Panel and was a member of the National Council of Education Standards and Testing. He is currently a member of the National Academy of Education.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

OSHALAMIBI I.A. ZANNU EL, )

ex rel. TRACEY A. REDMOND, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) No. 12 C 1746

)

CATERPILLAR, INC., )

)

Defendant. )

MEMORANDUM ORDER

This pro se Complaint of Employment Discrimination, prepared

on the form made available by this District Court’s Clerk’s

Office for use by parties unrepresented by lawyers, bears the

caption listed in this memorandum order. It appears from the In

Forma Pauperis Application (“Application”) that was tendered in

conjunction with the Complaint that plaintiff’s name was

originally “Redmond,” so that the “Zannu El” name was later 1

adopted by plaintiff.

Because Zannu El (as he will be referred to here) has not

received a right-to-sue letter from the EEOC (Complaint ¶8(a)),

he cannot assert any Title VII claims. That leaves potentially

open his charges under 42 U.S.C. §1981 (“Section 1981”) of

employment discrimination due to his color (Complaint ¶9(b)) and

race (Complaint ¶9(e)). But this is all that Complaint ¶13

charges in that regard (copied verbatim):

 Application ¶10 lists Wade and Taylor Redmond as 1

plaintiff’s two sons.
6/6/11 D.A. Hearing at Caterpillar Jayme Koller refused

to honor my name change she said she would not refer to

me by correct name and I was fired after meeting on

7/1/11 while at home on indefinite suspension.

Although what this Court is called upon to do (and does in

fact) is credit Zannu El’s allegations at this threshold stage,

the skeletal just quoted statement does not plausibly support a

Section 1981 claim. And because in forma pauperis status

requires not only the plaintiff’s financial inability to pay the

$350 filing fee (a requirement that the Application appears to

satisfy) but also the plaintiff’s assertion of a sufficiently

plausible claim, the Application is denied without prejudice.

Accordingly, if on or before March 29 Zannu El either pays

the filing fee or amends his Complaint allegations to provide a

more meaningful showing of an asserted Section 1981 violation,

this action will be permitted to proceed. If neither of those

things is done, both the Complaint and this action will be

dismissed without prejudice on March 30.

________________________________________

Milton I. Shadur

Senior United States District Judge

Date: March 13, 2012

2
#### Dean *v.*The State.

March 11, 1913.

Indictment for murder. Before Judge Mathews. Houston superior court. November *22,*1912.

*J. W. Bloodworth*and *B. N. Holtzclaw,*for plaintiff in error.

*Thomas S. Felder, attorney-general,*and *John P. Boss, solicitor-general,*contra.

Atkinson, J.

1. The failure to charge upon the subject of impeachment of witnesses is not cause for the grant of a new trial, in the absence of appropriate timely written request to instruct in reference thereto. *Brown*v. *State,*138 *Ga.*814 (76 S. E. 379).

2. In the light of the evidence and the entire charge, the grounds of the motion for new trial, based on certain excerpts from the charge, were not sufficient to require a new trial.

3. The evidence was sufficient to support the verdict.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Beeh, J., absent. The other Justices concur.*
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, March 14, 2022.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, March 14, 2022

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A22D0255. JACKSON MANALAKOS v. THE STATE.

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

CR1800800
##### 



Exhibit 31
 Certification of Trust Officer Pursuant to
Rule 13a-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Kiewit Royalty Trust, for which U.S. Bank National Association acts as Trustee;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this annual report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present
in all material respects the financial condition, distributable income and changes in trust corpus of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this annual report;4.
    
    I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)), or for causing such controls and procedures to be established and maintained, for the registrant and I have:a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on
such evaluation; andc)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and5.
    
    I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors:a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting.
 st
 By:
    /s/ Ted L. HallTed L. HallTrust Officer
U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee 15
## About the Institute of Education Sciences

The Education Sciences Reform Act of 2002 established within the U.S. Department of Education, the Institute of Education Sciences (IES). The mission of IES is to provide rigorous evidence on which to ground education practice and policy. This is accomplished through the work of its four centers.

Take a look at the Education Science Reform Act of 2002 (PDF).

**Note:** This link is to a compilation of the Education Sciences Reform Act of 2002, as amended, which is an unofficial document prepared by the House Office of Legislative Counsel (HOLC) for the use and convenience of the Members and committees of the U.S. House of Representatives and should not be cited as legal evidence of the law.  Last Modified: 06/15/2022
Adams, Kevin (OST) 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Cc: 

Subject: 

Matt Allen [mallen@garden-city.org] 

Friday, July 08,2011 4:10 PM 

Devany, Dennis (OST); Adams, Kevin (OST) .', 

Ken Strobel; tdougherty@haysusa.com; hdpart@greatb~il(;f.cbm; nfar~).lal1@cityofliberal.org; 

Rachelle Powell ,- ~ 

Request for an extension (no 2) 

Mr. DeVany and Mr. Adams, 

On behalf of Ken Strobel, City Manager in Dodge City, we request an additional extension of an additional 21 days (until 

Aug 6th

) to submit the community's response for the selection of air carrier as part of the Essential Air Service bidding 

process. In an effort to ensure regional community commitment matches the Governing Body's understanding of the 

level of service expected out of GCK, we have been opened up serious discussions with the City of Dodge City and are 

considering offering a consolidation of our resources to accommodate a level of service that meets our local air traffic 

needs and provides both DOT and our communities with an opportunity perhaps grow our service beyond the need for 

subsidy. I have personally visited with the Toby Dougherty in Hays and Debbie Giskie in Liberal and they do not object to 

this extension. I have left a message with Howard Partington in Great Bend. 

Both Dodge City and Garden City recognize that extension of the community response period can prolong the 

uncertainty. We appreciate the patience of the DOT and our western Kansas colleagues while we further investigate 

and conduct due diligence on this very unique opportunity. 

Thank you both for considering this request. 

Matt Allen 

City Manager 

City of Garden City, KS 

(620) 276-1160 

1
#### Evelyn D. McCullough et al., Copartners Doing Business as Jeb Electric Co., Appellants, v. Board of Education of Ramapo Central School District No. 2, Rockland County, Respondent.

In an action to recover damages for breach of contract, plaintiffs appeal: (1) from an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County, entered December 14, 1959, granting defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings, pursuant to rule 112 of the Rules of Civil Practice, and denying plaintiffs’ cross motion for leave to present, *nunc pro tunc,*a verified claim pursuant to section 3813 of the Education Law and for leave to, amend the complaint so as to allege the fact of such presentation of claim; and (2) from the judgment of said court, entered December 28, 1959, in favor of defendant in accordance with said order. Order and judgment reversed, without costs; defendant’s motion denied; and plaintiffs’ cross motion granted, with leave to plaintiffs to allege, *inter alia,*in their amended complaint, the facts which they claim constitute waiver and estoppel as to the defects in the notice of claim; and with leave to plaintiffs to serve their amended complaint within 20 days after the service of the order to be made hereon, together with notice of its entry. The court has power to permit the claim to be amended by supplying the omitted verification thereof *(Boutelle*V. *Central School Dist. No. 1,*2 AD 2d 925). Under the circumstances disclosed in the record, permission thus to amend the claim should have been granted. Plaintiffs also should be given an opportunity to allege the facts which they urge constitute waiver or estoppel, or both, with respect to any defect or defects in the paper they claim constitutes their notice of claim (cf. *Teresta*V. *City of New York,*304 N. Y. 440; *Matter of Cavagnol*v. *Town of Orangetown, 17*Mise. 2d 943, 945; *Matter of McKiernan*v. *Board of Educ.,*1 Mise 2d 925, 927). We do not pass on the question of whether the facts set forth in this record would constitute a valid waiver or estoppel. Nolan, P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>

 
                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.2
 
                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTS
 
  We hereby consent to the use of our report dated December 7, 1994, relating
to the financial statements of Recognition International Inc. and its
subsidiaries, which report appears on page 16 of this BancTec, Inc. Annual
Report of Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1996, which Form 10-K we
understand has in turn been incorporated by reference into BancTec's
previously filed Registration Statement Form S-3 (No. 33-28942); Registration
Statement Form S-8 (No. 33-28939); Registration Statement Form S-8 (No.
29163); Registration Statement Form S-8 (No. 33-32824); Registration Statement
Form S-3 (No. 33-35988); Registration Statement Form S-8 (No. 33-37377);
Registration Statement Form S-3 (No. 33-49918); Registration Statement Form S-
8 (No. 33-71114); and Registration Statement S-8 (No. 33-58335). We also
consent to the use of our report on the Financial Statement Schedules, which
report appears on page 44 of this Form 10-K.
 
Price Waterhouse, LLP
 
Dallas, Texas
March 26, 1997
 
                                       1
201.670 Appointment of property administrators and plant clearance officers. ( a ) The appropriate agency authority shall appoint or terminate (in writing) property administrators and plant clearance officers.
( b ) In appointing qualified property administrators and plant clearance officers, the appointing authority shall consider experience, training, education, business acumen, judgment, character, and ethics.
[76 FR 52142, Aug. 19, 2011]
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

720 

CAF 14-00385 

PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, VALENTINO, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ. 

 

IN THE MATTER OF JAVONTE G. 

----------------------------------------------- 

JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, ORDER 

PETITIONER-RESPONDENT; 

 

SHAWN E., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. 

D.J. & J.A. CIRANDO, ESQS., SYRACUSE (ELIZABETH deV. MOELLER OF

COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

ARTHUR C. STEVER, IV, WATERTOWN, FOR PETITIONER-RESPONDENT. 

SCOTT A. OTIS, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD, WATERTOWN. 

 

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Jefferson County

(Richard V. Hunt, J.), entered February 19, 2014 in a proceeding

pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b. The order terminated the

parental rights of respondent. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed without costs.

Entered: June 12, 2015 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
#### 2052.200 Authority.
#### Ruby Brill v. Joseph Brill et al.

Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted. Settle order on notice.' Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, McNally, Stevens and Noonan, JJ.
AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO THE NASA RESEARCH ANNOUNCEMENT (NRA) ENTITLED

"RESEARCH OPPORTUNITIES IN SPACE AND EARTH SCIENCES (ROSES) 2010," 

NNH10ZDA001N, RELEASED FEBRUARY 12, 2010 

Due Date delayed for C.20 Astrobiology Science and Technology for Exploring Planets 

(ASTEP) Program. 

Astrobiology Science and Technology for Exploring Planets (ASTEP) program solicits 

proposals for investigations focused on exploring the Earth’s extreme environments in 

order to develop a sound technical and scientific basis to conduct astrobiological research 

on other solar system bodies. 

This amendment delays the proposal due date for Appendix C.20, Astrobiology Science 

and Technology for Exploring Planets (ASTEP) Program. Programmatic schedule 

conflicts at NASA Headquarters have postponed the ASTEP peer review and hence the 

date when SMD must have proposals. A corresponding deferral of the ASTEP due date 

will provide the community additional time to prepare proposals. The proposal due date 

for ASTEP has been changed to Friday, July 16, 2010. Table 2 and Table 3 of the 

Summary of Solicitation for this NRA have been updated to reflect this change. 

Questions concerning ASTEP may be addressed to Mary Voytek, Planetary Science 

Division, Science Mission Directorate, NASA Headquarters, Washington, DC 20546-

0001; Telephone: (202) 358-1577; Email: mary.voytek-1@nasa.gov
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-START>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                            SEP-30-2000
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    84,575,715
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                            0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                              0
<EQUITIES>                             124,789,423
<MORTGAGE>                                       0
<REAL-ESTATE>                           10,943,776
<TOTAL-INVEST>                         223,448,782
<CASH>                                   1,469,541
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                       3,472,137
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                  14,306,963
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         277,137,809
<POLICY-LOSSES>                         76,793,462
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                     46,348,561
<POLICY-OTHER>                                   0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                            0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                11,558,166
<OTHER-SE>                             135,546,441
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           277,137,809
<PREMIUMS>                              64,832,530
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                      6,800,513
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                       7,275,290
<OTHER-INCOME>                             253,434
<BENEFITS>                              37,739,948
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>             (1,662,774)
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                    24,544,624
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         17,462,445
<INCOME-TAX>                             5,066,064
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     12,396,381
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                            12,396,381
<EPS-BASIC>                                 1.11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 1.11
<RESERVE-OPEN>                          77,256,192
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                     29,817,633
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                        7,922,315
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                      15,510,892
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                        22,691,786
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                         76,793,462
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                          0


</TABLE>