8748 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 25 / Tuesday, February 9, 2021 / Proposed Rules 

Pennsylvania’s presumptive RACT 

regulation. 

EPA also finds that all the proposed 

revisions to previously SIP approved 

RACT requirements, under the 1997 

8-hour ozone standard, as discussed in 

AMS’ SIP revisions, will result in 

equivalent or additional reductions of 

NOX and/or VOC emissions and should 

not interfere with any applicable 

requirement concerning attainment or 

reasonable further progress with the 

NAAQS or interfere with other 

applicable CAA requirement in section 

110(l) of the CAA. 

EPA’s complete analysis of AMS’ 

case-by-case RACT SIP revisions is 

included in the TSD available in the 

docket for this rulemaking action and 

available online at https://

www.regulations.gov, Docket number 

EPA–R03–OAR–2020–0598. 

IV. Proposed Action 

Based on EPA’s review, EPA is 

proposing to approve the Pennsylvania 

SIP revisions for the nine case-by-case 

RACT facilities listed in Table 2 of this 

document and incorporate by reference 

in the Pennsylvania SIP, via the RACT 

II permits, source specific RACT 

determinations under the 2008 8-hour 

ozone NAAQS for certain major sources 

of NOX and VOC emissions. EPA is 

soliciting public comments on the 

issues discussed in this document. 

These comments will be considered 

before taking final action. As EPA views 

each facility as a separable SIP revision, 

should EPA receive comment on one 

facility but not others, EPA may take 

separate, final action on the remaining 

facilities. 

V. Incorporation by Reference 

In this document, EPA is proposing to 

include in a final EPA rule regulatory 

text that includes incorporation by 

reference. In accordance with 

requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, EPA is 

proposing to incorporate by reference 

source specific RACT determinations 

via the RACT II permits as described in 

Sections II and III of this document— 

Summary of SIP Revisions and EPA’s 

Evaluation of SIP Revisions. EPA has 

made, and will continue to make, these 

materials generally available through 

https://www.regulations.gov and at the 

EPA Region III Office (please contact the 

person identified in the FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT section of this 

preamble for more information). 

VI. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews 

Under the CAA, the Administrator is 

required to approve a SIP submission 

that complies with the provisions of the 

CAA and applicable Federal regulations. 

42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). 

Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, 

EPA’s role is to approve state choices, 

provided that they meet the criteria of 

the CAA. Accordingly, this action 

merely approves state law as meeting 

Federal requirements and does not 

impose additional requirements beyond 

those imposed by state law. For that 

reason, this proposed action: 

• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ subject to review by the Office 

of Management and Budget under 

Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, 

October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, 

January 21, 2011); 

• Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 

FR 9339, February 2, 2017) regulatory 

action because it is not a significant 

regulatory action under Executive Order 

12866. 

• Does not impose an information 

collection burden under the provisions 

of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); 

• Is certified as not having a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 

U.S.C. 601 et seq.); 

• Does not contain any unfunded 

mandate or significantly or uniquely 

affect small governments, as described 

in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); 

• Does not have Federalism 

implications as specified in Executive 

Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 

1999); 

• Is not an economically significant 

regulatory action based on health or 

safety risks subject to Executive Order 

13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); 

• Is not a significant regulatory action 

subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 

28355, May 22, 2001); 

• Is not subject to requirements of 

section 12(d) of the National 

Technology Transfer and Advancement 

Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because 

application of those requirements would 

be inconsistent with the CAA; and 

• Does not provide EPA with the 

discretionary authority to address, as 

appropriate, disproportionate human 

health or environmental effects, using 

practicable and legally permissible 

methods, under Executive Order 12898 

(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). 

In addition, this proposed 

rulemaking, addressing the NOX and 

VOC RACT requirements for nine caseby-case facilities for the 1997 and 2008 

8-hour ozone NAAQS, does not have 

tribal implications as specified by 

Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, 

November 9, 2000), because the SIP is 

not approved to apply in Indian country 

located in the state, and EPA notes that 

it will not impose substantial direct 

costs on tribal governments or preempt 

tribal law. 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Incorporation by 

reference, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, 

Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Volatile organic 

compounds. 

Dated: February 3, 2021. 

Diana Esher, 

Acting Regional Administrator, Region III. 

[FR Doc. 2021–02586 Filed 2–8–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 

COMMISSION 

47 CFR Parts 1 and 90 

[WP Docket No. 07–100; Report No. 3167; 

FRS 17394] 

Petitions for Reconsideration of Action 

in Rulemaking Proceeding 

AGENCY: Federal Communications 

Commission. 

ACTION: Petitions for reconsideration. 

SUMMARY: Petitions for Reconsideration 

(Petitions) have been filed in the 

Commission’s rulemaking proceeding 

by Jeffrey S. Cohen, on behalf of APCO 

International, Ralph A. Haller, on behalf 

of National Public Safety 

Telecommunications Council and Chief 

Jeffrey D. Johnson, on behalf of The 

Public Safety Spectrum Alliance. 

DATES: Oppositions to the Petitions 

must be filed on or before February 24, 

2021. Replies to an opposition must be 

filed on or before March 8, 2021. 

ADDRESSES: Federal Communications 

Commission, 45 L Street NE, 

Washington, DC 20554. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Nellie A. Foosaner, Mobility Division, 

Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, 

(202) 418–2925 or Nellie.Foosaner@

fcc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a 

summary of the Commission’s 

document, Report No. 3167, released 

January 12, 2021. The full text of the 

Petitions can be accessed online via the 

Commission’s Electronic Comment 

Filing System at: http://apps.fcc.gov/ 

ecfs/. The Commission will not send a 

Congressional Review Act (CRA) 

submission to Congress or the 

Government Accountability Office 

pursuant to the CRA, 5 U.S.C. 

801(a)(1)(A), because no rules are being 

adopted by the Commission. 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 25 / Tuesday, February 9, 2021 / Proposed Rules 8749 

Subject: 4.9 GHz Band, FCC 20–137, 

published at 85 FR 76469, November 30, 

2020, in WP Docket No. 07–100. This 

document is being published pursuant 

to 47 CFR 1.429(e). See also 47 CFR 

1.4(b)(1) and 1.429(f), (g). 

Number of Petitions Filed: 3. 

Federal Communications Commission. 

Marlene Dortch, 

Secretary, Office of the Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2021–01366 Filed 2–8–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6712–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

National Oceanic and Atmospheric 

Administration 

50 CFR Parts 223 and 226 

[Docket No: 200918–0249] 

RIN 0648–BJ52 

Endangered and Threatened Species; 

Critical Habitat for the Threatened 

Indo-Pacific Corals, Extension of 

Public Comment Period 

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries 

Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 

Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), 

Commerce. 

ACTION: Proposed rule; second extension 

of comment period. 

SUMMARY: We, NMFS, are extending the 

public comment period by 30 days for 

our proposed rule, published in the 

Federal Register on November 27, 2020, 

to designate critical habitat for seven 

threatened corals in U.S. waters in the 

Indo-Pacific (Acropora globiceps, 

Acropora jacquelineae, Acropora retusa, 

Acropora speciosa, Euphyllia 

paradivisa, Isopora crateriformis, and 

Seriatopora aculeata) under the 

Endangered Species Act. On December 

23, 2020 the comment period was 

extended 30 days. The end of the public 

comment period is extended again from 

February 25, 2021, to March 27, 2021. 

DATES: The comment period for the 

notice of proposed rulemaking 

published at 85 FR 76262, and first 

extended at 85 FR 83899, is extended. 

The public comment period is extended 

by 30 days to March 27, 2021. 

Comments must be received by March 

27, 2021, as specified under ADDRESSES. 

Comments received after this date may 

not be accepted. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit public 

comments in writing by any of the 

following methods. Comments must be 

received by March 27, 2021: 

• Electronic Submissions: Submit all 

electronic public comments via the 

Federal eRulemaking Portal. Go to 

www.regulations.gov/ 

#!docketDetail;D=NOAA-NMFS-2016- 

0131 click the ‘‘Comment Now’’ icon, 

complete the required fields, and enter 

or attach your comments. 

• Mail: Lance Smith, Protected 

Resources Division, NMFS, Pacific 

Islands Regional Office, NOAA Inouye 

Regional Center, 1845 Wasp Blvd., Bldg. 

176, Honolulu, HI 96818. 

Instructions: You must submit 

comments by one of the previously 

described methods to ensure that we 

receive, document, and consider them. 

Comments sent by any other method, to 

any other address or individual, or 

received after the end of the comment 

period, may not be considered. All 

comments received are a part of the 

public record and will generally be 

posted to http://www.regulations.gov 

without change. All Personal Identifying 

Information (for example, name, 

address, etc.) voluntarily submitted by 

the commenter may be publicly 

accessible. Do not submit confidential 

business information or otherwise 

sensitive or protected information. 

NMFS will accept anonymous 

comments (enter ‘‘N/A’’ in the required 

fields if you wish to remain 

anonymous). 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Lance Smith, NMFS Pacific Islands 

Region, lance.smith@noaa.gov or 808– 

725–5131. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On 

November 27, 2020, NMFS proposed to 

designate critical habitat for seven IndoPacific corals listed as threatened under 

the Endangered Species Act (ESA) 

within U.S. waters in Guam, the 

Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana 

Islands (CNMI), American Samoa, and 

the Pacific Remote Island Area (PRIA). 

The seven species are Acropora 

globiceps, A. jacquelineae, A. retusa, A. 

speciosa, Euphyllia paradivisa, Isopora 

crateriformis, and Seriatopora aculeata. 

Proposed coral critical habitat consists 

of substrate and water column habitat 

characteristics essential for the 

reproduction, recruitment, growth, and 

maturation of the listed corals. 

Proposed critical habitat consists of 

17 separate units, each of which 

contains all ESA-listed corals that occur 

there. There are four units in American 

Samoa (Tutuila, Ofu-Olosega, Ta‘u, Rose 

Atoll); seven in CNMI (Rota, Aguijan, 

Tinian, Saipan, Anatahan, Pagan, and 

Maug Islands); five in the PRIA 

(Howland, Palmyra, Kingman, Johnston, 

and Jarvis Islands); and one unit 

encompassing all proposed designations 

in Guam. Between one and six listed 

corals occur in each unit. The following 

areas are either ineligible for proposed 

critical habitat, or excluded because of 

national security impacts: A complex of 

overlapping Navy Surface Danger Zones 

off of Ritidian Point in Guam; other 

parts of Guam; parts of Tinian; a group 

of six Navy anchorage berths on 

Garapan Bank in Saipan; all of Farallon 

de Medinilla; and all of Wake Atoll. 

Critical habitat protections apply only 

to Federal actions under section 7 of the 

ESA. Activities that are not funded, 

authorized, or carried out by a Federal 

agency are not subject to these 

protections. The proposed rule and 

other materials prepared in support of 

this action, including maps showing the 

proposed critical habitat, are available 

at: https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/ 

action/proposed-rule-designate-criticalhabitat-threatened-indo-pacific-corals. 

The original public comment period 

for this proposed rule was scheduled to 

close on January 26, 2021. In response 

to public input, we extended the public 

comment period by 30 days to February 

25, 2021, and held two online public 

hearings on January 19 and January 21, 

2021. At the public hearings, we 

received several requests to again 

extend the public comment period, to 

allow the public to adequately review 

the extensive supporting materials for 

the proposed rule in order to formulate 

public comments. Similarly, on January 

26, 2021, we received a letter from the 

Governors of CNMI, Guam, and 

American Samoa requesting extension 

of the public comment period for the 

same reason. In response, we are 

extending the public comment period 

by another 30 days. We are accepting 

public comments for the proposed rule 

through March 27, 2021. Public 

comments can be submitted as 

described under ADDRESSES. 

Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq. 

Dated: February 3, 2021. 

Samuel D. Rauch III, 

Deputy Assistant Administrator for 

Regulatory Programs, National Marine 

Fisheries Service. 

[FR Doc. 2021–02540 Filed 2–8–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–22–P 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS