P.I 

OAR Box 1490 

Prepped by Charmelle Mathews 

Document Number: 

18) IV-B-18 

Docket Number: 

A-94-52 

Printed 8/4/2008 11:51:46 AM Sheet 18 of 273 
P.2 

PES 

A MACTEC COMPANY 

TaEKTORSOTJOKT 

A-^52. 

Pacific Environmental Servi 

5001 South Miami Boulevard, Suite 300 

P.O. BOX 12077 

Research Triangle Park, NC 27709 

Office: 919/941-0333 Fax: 919/941-0234 

Home Page: www.mactec.com 

TO: Docket A-94-52 

FROM: Kenneth R. Meardon 

Pacific Environmental Services, Inc. 

DATE: October 31,2002 

SUBJECT: NonCorrosion Resistant Centrifugal Casting Emission Factors and Operation 

Characteristics 

The purpose ofthis memo is to summarize information on (1) the emission factors 

available for noncorrosion resistant centrifugal casting operations and (2) the 

characteristics of these operations at each ofthe six known facilities. Table 1 presents the 

HAP content, emission factors, and emission rate for the six known facilities. Table 2 

presents information on air movement and temperature associated with the centrifugal 

casting machines and curing. Following these tables are telephone conversation reports 

(Attachment 1) for these six facilities and test reports (Attachments 2 and 3) for two 

facilities. 

Emission Factors 

Three ofthe six facilities reported emission factors for their centrifugal casting 

operations. These facilities and their emission factors are presented below. The actual 

emission factor reported by Altec is considered by them to be confidential. 

Henderson, Black, and Green: 0.3% of available HAP 

Newmark (formerly Sherman Poles): 2.6% of available HAP 

Altec: >2.6% of available HAP 

The HB&G emission factor is based on a test at the facility. The Newmark 

emission factor is based on a similar facility that was tested in Germany. This test is 

attached. The emission factor reported by Altec is based on numerous material balances 

conducted at the facility. 

Henderson. Black, and Green 

The HB&G emission factors was calculated as follows (pages refer to report 

found in Attachment 2): 

Emissions: 0.576 lbs/hr 
P.3 

NonCorrosion Resistant Centrifugal Casting 

October 31, 2002 

page2 

From Appendix C, pages C-3 and C-4 

Run 1: (208 scfm x 104 MW x 60 min/hr x 191.9 ppmw) / 

385.3E06 

E06 

0.646 lbs/hr 

Run 2: (202 scfm x 104 MW x 60 min/hr x 154.7 ppmw) / 385.3 

0.506 lbs/hr 

Average = 0.576 lbs/hr 

Available styrene (page 2-3): 206 lbs/hr 

Emission factor: 0.28% (= 0.576/206) 

Newmark 

The Newmark emission factor was calculated as follows (pages refer to report 

found in Attachment 3): 

Emissions (page 10): 770 grams per hour (average) 

1,210 grams per hour (worst-case) 

Resin Usage (page 8): 235 kg over 2.75 hours = 85.45 kg/hr = 

85,455 grams/hr 

Styrene content (page 9): 35% 

Available styrene: 29,909 grams/hr (= 85,455 x 0.35) 

Emission factors: 2.57% (= 770/29,909) average 

4.05% (= 1,210/29,909) worst-case 

Based on the most frequent set of operating characteristics (i.e., passive venting at 

ambient temperature) ofthe known facilities, as shown in Table 1, a 2.6% emission factor 

is judged to be a reasonable estimate of emissions from other non-corrosion resistant 

centrifugal casting facilities. 
NonCorrosion Resistant Centrifugal Casting 

October 31, 2002 

page3 

TABLE 1. NONCORROSION RESISTANT CENTRIFUGAL CASTING HAP CONTENT, 

EMISSION FACTORS, AND EMISSION RATES 

FACILITY 

Altec 

Design Tanks 

(formerly Raven) 

Dixie-Pacific 

Henderson, Black, 

and Green 

Newmark (formerly 

Sherman Poles) 

Pentair Water 

Treatment (formerly 

Structural NA) 

HAP 

CONTENT 

44.5 

49 

<35 

<45 

37.5 

43 

EMISSION 

FACTOR 

>2.6% 

2.6% 

2.6% 

0.3% 

2.6% 

>2.6% 

EMISSION 

RATE 

(lbs/ton) 

>25.5 

25.5 

<18 

<2.7 

19.5 

>25.5 

COMMENTS 

Active venting, ambient temperature. Emission factor is based on 

numerous material balances. 

Passive venting, ambient temperature. Emission factor assumed 

same as Newmark. 

Passive venting, ambient temperature. Emission factor assumed 

same as Newmark. 

Active venting. Emission factor based on 1997 emission test at 

facility. 

Passive venting, ambient temperature. Emission factor based on 

emission test at similar facility in Germany. 

Active venting, elevated temperature. Emission factor assumed 

same as Altec. 
NonCorrosion Resistant Centrifugal Casting 

October 31, 2002 

page4 

TABLE 2. NONCORROSION RESISTANT CENTRIFUGAL CASTING OPERATIONS 

Facility 

Altec 

Design Tanks 

(formerly Raven) 

Dixie-Pacific 

Henderson, Black, 

and Green 

Newmark 

(formerly Sherman 

Poles) 

Pentair Water 

Treatment 

(formerly 

Structural NA) 

Product 

booms 

small 

diameter 

tanks 

architectural 

columns 

architectural 

columns 

poles 

bases for 

water 

softening 

tanks 

Air Movement and Temperature 

Air moved through molds. Centrifugal 

casting machines have end caps with holes 

that provide an opening for air to be moved 

through the spinning mold during curing. 

Fans/air flow used for cooling, not curing. 

They have hoods and ductwork at the open 

end ofthe molds that pull air downward. 

Air is "drawn" from open end of molds using 

a fan located in the outside wall. No heating 

of air. 

Passive venting at ambient conditions. 

Air from molds is vented through suction 

lines (no blowers) and, along with air in the 

room in which they are located, vented 

through a roof stack. 

Air is not blown through molds. 

Machine is closed at one end and open at the 

other. Heated air is blown through the 

machine to remove heat and is then vented to 

the atmosphere. 

Curing 

Product is removed after 

the gel stage, while still a 

semi-solid and cure it in 

ambient air. 

Most parts are fully cured 

in the mold. To meet FDA 

requirements, some are 

steam-cured after removal. 

Product is moved to 

separate room to complete 

curing. 

Product is cured 

completely in the mold, 

allowed to cool, and then 

removed. 

Appears that part is cured 

in the mold. 

Comments 

Resin is not heated. They 

have not changed their resins 

since submittal ofthe original 

information. 

Mold is not heated. Resin is 

heated to 90 to 100 deg F. 

No heating ofresin, mold, or 

air. 

Molds are heated during 

winter months; target temp for 

reaction is 150 deg F. 

Mold heated to 280 deg F. 

Currently, only operating one 

machine, which is operated 

sporadically. 

•*• 

O l 
P.6 

ATTACHMENT 1 

Telephone Conversation Reports 

S 
P.7 

MAK~//"3 0 TRI t-UO HYi riELU OEAUU C 

03/2T/8S 10:11 ©19186410234 PES RIP NC y002/002 

A UJ? 

Contact Report 

'V Melanie Proctor, Pacific Environmental Services, Inc. (PES) 

Date: March 26,1998 

Mr. Colby Edwards 

Company: Altec Industries, Inc. 

Telephone Number: (816)364-2244 

Fax Numben (816) 236-1352 

?H <\\<\ W oz^ 

Contact Summary: 

MS. Proctor explained thai PES is working with the U.S. EPA on the development ofa 

national emission standard for the reinforced plastic composites industiy. Ms. Proctor added that 

Altec Industries, Inc. was contacted to verify infonnation provided in the 1993 EPA screening 

survey submitted for their facility. ^ ^ 

Ms. Proctor asked Mr. Edwards if Altec Industrie Inc. is using any pollution prevention 

measures for their ccntrifiigal casting process. Ms. Proctor further explained that such pollution 

prevention measures may include management or elimination of air flow through the centrifugal 

casting machines, not heating the air and thc r«in <farir^ application and curing, or the redustkm 

if hazardous air pollutants (HAP) in the resia $dfr. Edwards indicated that Altec Industries, Inc. is ^ 

'not using any special pollution prevention measmg^for.thflt process. He explained that the 

EntnZugal acting machines have end caps which haveJOMnn them that provide an opening for 

air to be moved through the spinning mold during curing. Mr. Edwards indicated that he did not 

know ihe exact air flow rate through the mold at the time (Could you please find out what the air 

flow rate through the mold Is and Ifthe resin or tbe air is heated ia the process? Ifthe air or 

tiie resin is heated, eould you provide the temperature?). Accordmg to Mr. Edwards the facility 

stiU uses the same resins that were repotted in the 1993 screening survey which are polyester flex 

resin at a HAP content of 30 percent and unsaturated polyester resin at a HAP content of 45 percent. 

INFORMATION IS ACCURATE 

H &st* ts //*r kt*leJ /A 4t*. pmc*s 

^Kr/Aj . /-klpS tool /A0l#£ CLffer ^fO'tf&'M'*— 
P.8 

From: 

Date: 

Contact: 

Contact Report 

Kenneth R. Meardon, Pacific Environmental Services, Inc. (PES) 

June 28 and July 9,2002 

Mr. Colby Edwards 

Company: Altec Industries) 

Telephone Number: (816) 364-2244 

Fax Number: 

Contact Summary: 

Dr. Meardon contacted Mr. Edwards to confirm certain aspects of centrifugal casting 

conducted at their facility. Mr. Edwards indicated that they remove their product after the gel 

stage, while still a semi-solid and cure it in ambient air. They have hoods and ductwork at the 

open end ofthe molds that pull air downward. 

They have developed an emission factor for their centrifugal casting process based on 

numerous material balances. He noted that they have not changed their resin since submittal of 

the original information. 

Mr. Edwards indicated that 2000 hours per year of operation is typical. 

7 
Contact Report 

From: Kenneth R. Meardon, Pacific Environmental Services, Inc. (PES) 

Date: June 25, 2002 

Contact: Mr. Marcus Weeldryer 

Company: Design Tanks (formerly Raven Industries) 

Telephone Number: (605)965-1600 

Fax Number: (605) 965-1630 

Contact Summary: 

P.9 

Dr. Meardon contacted Mr. Weeldryer to confirm certain aspects of centrifugal casting 

conducted at the Sioux Falls, SD, facility. Dr. Meardon read a portion ofthe April 8,1998, 

telecon between Melanie Proctor, PES, and Mr. Kurt Doeden, Raven Industries, describing the 

operation ofthe centrifugal casting operations at the Sioux Falls, SD, facility. Mr. Weeldryer 

indicated that the description was accurate with the exception that they heat their resin to 

between 90 and 100 deg F within an in-line heater for application in the molds. Mr. Weeldryer 

confirmed that they do not blow air through the molds, but by using a fan located in the outside 

wall air from the open end ofthe molds is drawn downward through grates in the floor, travels 

through trenches, and is emitted to the outside air. The parts are fully cured in the molds, 

although on occasion to meet FDA requirements the parts are steam-cured after removal from the 

mold. The facility is still making small diameter tanks, though the upper range is now 14-feet 

internal diameter. 

Dr. Meardon asked if they had done any testing of emissions. Mr. Weeldryer stated that 

they were in the process of setting up to conduct full day testing tomorrow, June 26. 

Dr. Meardon asked if any ofthe information they discussed was considered by Design 

Tanks to be confidential business information. Mr. Weeldryer stated that none ofthe information 

discussed is confidential. 
P.10 

'a^7o»>»«***wioVosf **~Tari»"iJ»V4i.o"asaV ""re s *r r nw ifljoojc/ooa vi/ w a r w 

Contact Report 

From; Melanie Proctor, Pacific Enviromnental Services, Inc. (PES) 

Date: April 8,1998 

Contact: Mr. Kurt Doeden 

Company: Raven Industries, Inc. 

Telephone Number: (60S) 336-2750 

Fax Number: (605)335-0268 

Contact Summary: 

Ms. Proctor explained that PES is working with the U.S. EPA on the development ofa 

national emission standard for the reinforced plastic composites industry. She added that Raven 

Industries was contacted to verify information provided in the 1993 EPA screening survey for their 

centrifugal casting process. Ms. Proctor pointed out that the EPA ia in the process of establishing 

emission standards for all major sources of hazardous air pollutants (HAP) that reflect maximum 

achievable control technology (MACT). She explained that the EPA is currently reviewing any 

pollution prevention or reduction measures that are being used in centrifugal casting operations, in 

order to determine the MACT floor for this process. 

Ms. Proctor asked Mr. Doeden if Raven Industries is using any pollution prevention 

measures for their centrifugal casting process. She explained that such pollution prevention 

measures may include management or elimination of air flow through the centrifugal casting 

machines, not heating thc air, the resin, or the mold during application and £unn&)and the reduction 

of HAP in the resin. Set *Jo|e_ 

Mr. Doeden indicated tiiat Raven Industries does not heat the air, the resin, or the mold in 

their centrifugal casting operation. He also pointed out that one end of each of the 12 molds is 

closed with an end cap. Mr. Doeden explained that air is drawn from the open end of the 12 molds. 

Mr. Doeden was not sure about the exact air flow drawn from each ofthe molds but he indicated that 

only one fan was used to draw air from the 12 molds and that this fan has a design air flow rate of 

12,000 cubic feet per minute (cfm). He added that the air flow from each mold would likely not 

exceed 1,000 cfm and could possibly be lower. 

(Contact report continued on second page) 

INFORMATION IS ACCURATE 

1 

C**~cJi f o w\ee~[" ^"IbAr a.ff-rev<K.\ . 
p.11 

04/OV/M" ~ lV: 5V ' "BiVlMVlOZM " PES RTP NC m«a/ooa 

Could you please verify that all the products produced by your facility using centrifugal 

casting are products that are used for corrosion-resistant applications? UgA00ff 

Mr. Proctor explained that the average weighted HAP content of Raven Industries' resins 

was calculated to be 49 percent based on information that Mr. Doeden submitted to PES in 

November 1996. Ms. Proctor added that this average weighted HAP content was calculated based 

on the entire resin use at the plant including the resin use for filament winding, chop spray lay-up, 

and centrifugal casting. Ms. Proctor asked if distribution of resin usage is similar for all of their 

processes or if one process uses higher resin HAP contents tiian others. Mr. Doeden replied tiiat the 

average weighted resin HAP content of 49 percent was representative of all their processes. 

INFORMATION IS ACCURATE tt© 

(0 
P.12 

07/30/»« u: oo 

A 94 52 

II-F m 

Contact Report 

From: Melanie Proctor and Shawn McKee, Pacific Environmental Service* Inc. (PES) 

Date; July 29,1998 

Contact: Mr. Stephen Scharfenberg 

Company: Dude-Pacific Manufacturing Conpany, Inc. 

Telephone Number: (226)442-4513 

Fax Nunber: (256)442*4794 

Contact Summary: 

Ms. Proctor stated that Dixie-Pacific Manufacturing Company, Inc. was contacted to give 

infonnation about the costs that their facility may have incurred due to changing the ream used in Iheir 

manufacturing process from a resin with a hazardous air pollutant (HAP) content of 39.8% to 35%. 

Mr. Scharfenberg confirmed the change in resin being used by Dixie-Pacific Manufacturing 

Company, Inc lie stated tiiat no costs were associated with the change mtr« type of resm bdng used 

due to any processing problems, and that any increase in scrap or reworking of products because of 

the change was negligible. Dixie-Pacific Manulacturing Company, Inc. did not experience any 

difficulties in processing or pefermance problems rcsulb^ in an ioal^ty to mai^ products, and thus 

did not experience any loss in business due to these factors. Mr. Scharfenberg stated that the cost of 

the new resin was comparable to thc old resin. He also stated thstthere was nn increase In the cost of 

training, and no product certification tests were necessaiy due to tiie change m resins. 

Dixie-Pacific Manufacturing Company, Inc. did incur a cost ofa few hundred dollars because 

of performing drop-testing on finished architectural columns. According to Mr. Scharfenberg, tins oost 

includes the labor cost to make and test tiie samples. 

According to Mr. Scharfenberg, the facility's vendor, McWhorter Technologies, Inc.. was veiy 

belpM Inthe tnmsitionfom the higher HAP i^ ^ McWhorter Technologies, 

Inc. performed the testmg of properties and any other necessary testing free of charge, with the 

exception of the drop-testing performed by Dixie-Pacific Manufecturing Company, Inc. Mr. 

Scharfenberg also pointed out that McWhorter Technologies, Inc. conducted tests to ensure that tile 

new formulation provides the same load bearing product properties as the old formulation. Mr. 

Scharfenberg stated that it was possible that competition between suppliers added an additional 

incentive for McWhorter Technologies, Inc. xo aid Dixie-Pacific Manufacturing Company;, Inc. m the 

transition. 

INFORMATION IS ACCURATE A£A 

w 
P.13 

JUL IG 2002 10:52H M HBG 

07/18/02 08:46 'B'19199410234 

3348078665 

PES RTP NC 

p . 2 

©002/002 

From: 

Date: 

Contact: 

Contact Report 

Kenneth R. Meardon, Pacific Environmental Services, Inc. (PES) 

June 25, 2002 

Mr. Geoff McDuffie 

Company: Henderson, Black, and Green 

Telephone Number: (334) 566-5000, ext. 6514 

Fax Number: (334) 807-8665 

Contact Summary: 

Dr. Meardon contacted Mr. McDuffie to discuss certain aspects of centrifugal casting 

conducted atthe Troy, Alabama, facility. Mr. McDuffie indicated that [infonnation claimed to 

be confidential has been deleted]. 

The aiT from the molds is vented through suction lines and, along with the air in the room 

Ln which they are localed, vented through a roof stack. The facility also vents thc mixing room 

through a separate roof stack to the atmosphere. The volume of air from the spinners is much 

lower than that from the mixing room, while thc styrene concentration in the air from the 

spinners is much higher than that from the mixing room. Based on testing in 1997, the facility 

has calculated an emission factor for their facility, which they are using for all resins. 

(Information claimed to be confidential has been deleted.] 

Mr. McDuffie indicated that they had built a new plant designed specifically to be 

"friendly" for the potential installation of aihermal oxidizer. 

INFORMATION IS ACCURATE 
P.M 

From: 

Date: 

Contact: 

Company: 

Contact Report 

Kenneth R. Meardon, Pacific Environmental Services, Inc. (PES) 

June 20,2002 

Mr. Clarence Fairer 

Alabama Department of Environmental Management 

Telephone Number: (334)271-7892 

Fax Number: 

Contact Summary: 

Dr. Meardon contacted Mr. Fairer to discuss certain aspects of centrifugal casting conducted at 

the Henderson, Black, and Green facility located in Troy, Alabama. According to Mr. Fairer, the 

facility does not heat the resin, mold, or air. Resin is poured into open molds, which are then closed for 

about 15 to 20 minutes. They molds start getting warm and began offgasing. There are ducts at the 

end ofthe molds to get the emissions away from the workers. They do not use blowers on the mold, 

although they may have fans that "suck" the air out. While they are still curing, the columns are 

removed from the molds and are cured in a separate room. 

\3 
P.15 

From: 

Date: 

Contact: 

Company: 

Contact Report 

Kenneth R. Meardon, Pacific Environmental Services, Inc. (PES) 

July 12,2002 

Mr. Geoff McDuffie 

Henderson, Black, and Green 

Telephone Number: (334) 566-5000, ext. 6514 

Fax Number: (334)807-8665 

Contact Summary: 

Mr. McDuffie indicated that their facility is currently operating at approximately 100 

hours per week. 

(H 
P.16 

From: 

Date: 

Contact: 

Contact Report 

Kenneth R. Meardon, Pacific Environmental Services, Inc. (PES) 

July 15,2002 

Mr. Geoff McDuffie 

Company: Henderson, Black, and Green 

Telephone Number: (334) 566-5000, ext. 6514 

Fax Number: (334) 807-8665 

Contact Summary: 

In response to a June 25,2002, fax, Mr. McDuffie indicated that (1) the proper units for 

Table 2-3 should be "lbs styrene per hour" not "lbs styrene per shift" and (2) the 1,609 was equal 

to lbs of slurry. 

lb 
P.17 

Contact Report 

From: Kenneth R. Meardon, Pacific Environmental Services, Inc. (PES) 

Date: June 20,2002 

Contact: Mr. Bill Ross 

Company: Newmark (formerly Sherman Poles) 

Telephone Number: (803)625-3131 

Fax Number: 

Contact Summary: 

Dr. Meardon contacted Mr. Ross about certain aspects of their centrifugal casting 

operations. Mr. Ross indicated that they have 7 centrifugal casting machines, 6 ofwhich are 

used and the 7th is currently used as a spare. Reinforcement is placed on a insertion rod which is 

inserted into the mold, where it is spun so that the reinforcement is on the inside ofthe mold. 

The insertion rod is removed. Resin with catalyst is injected into the smaller end ofthe tapered 

mold via an automatic pump. They do not blow any air into the mold. The product is cured 

completely in the mold, allowed to cool, and then is removed. During winter months, for 

example, they will use infrared heaters on the exterior ofthe molds to warm them (pre-heat the 

mold) until the catalyst "gets going." They have a target temperature of 150 deg F for the 

reaction to take place. 

Mr. Ross indicated that their parent company has tested three similar machines in 

Germany for emissions. He is forwarding a copy ofthe test report to PES. He noted that in 

Germany they collect the emissions from the machines and vent them to the outside and that they 

were planning to instaU a similar emission collection system at the facility in South Carolina in 

the near future. 

Lastly, Mr. Ross indicated that an average HAP content of 37.5% is still accurate for their 

facility. 

IW 
P.18 

07/08/02 15:53 -©19199410234 PES RTP NC ®002/002 

Contact Report 

From: Kenneth R. Meardon, Pacific Environmental Services, Inc. (PES) 

Date: July 8., 2002 

Contact: Mr. Steven Oser 

Company: Pentair Water Treatment (fonnerly Structural North America) 

Telephone Number: (440) 821-4146 

Fax Number: (440) 286-7145 

Contact Summary: 

Dr. Meardon contacted Mr. Oser to discuss certain aspects of centrifugal casting 

conducted at the Chardon, Ohio, facility. Dr. Meardon inquired about the movement of air 

through the centrifugal casting macliine and whether or not it was heated. Mr. Oser first 

described the macliine and then its operation. He indicated that the machine resembles a clothes 

dryer. Fiberglass mats (about 4) are placed into the machine, which then spins forcing the mats 

to the inside part of the walls. Resin (a mixture of vinyl ester and polyester resin) is poured into 

the machine. The mold is heated and the part is cured. The machine is closed at one end and 

open at tlie other. Heated air is blown through the machine to remove heat and is then vented to 

the outside. Mr. Oser indicated that they have tested the vent for emissions and suggested that I 

contact Mr. Ken Ziemicki for additional information on emissions, /J^ J ;k'.e.ivicJfcc cj>r**jubz&. M e. 

KM*. &4 w»*t l*i*»»«. c*-*W^ •f-e.ct.-Ws 

Mr. Oser indicated that they have greatly reduced the use of their centrifugal casting <.,*•» c*-*-,,;^^ 

machines over the last three years by using a different process (injection molding) to produce tM^ liU , ' ) 

their bases. They currently only have one centrifugal casting machine, and it is operated "^ / 

sporadically. $° *-W-<*-

Dr. Meardon asked if any ofthe information they discussed was considered by Pentair 

Water Treatment to be confidential business infonnation. Mr. Oser stated tiiat none ofthe 

infonnation discussed is confidential. 

INFORMATION IS ACCURATE 

11 

I ' d SPZ'OKJ 9W3 'H"kl "IHMn I T\_A I c; I.UKCI-C 7nci*3'*Lj*3-inr 
P.19 

- 0*jr-i,°i— 20:.5-^*-'J1915i^:y ^ HM PES RTP NC NU. r ^ r. 

• 4^2/003 

A 945 7 

Contact Report 

From: Melanie Proctor, Pacific Environmental Services, Inc. (PES) 

Date: March 27,1998 

Contact: Mr. Kenneth Ziernicki 

Company: Structural North America 

Telephone Number: (440) 286-4116 

Fax Number: (440) 286-6504 

Contact Summary: 

Ma. Proctor explained that PES is working witii the U.S. EPA on the development of a 

national emission standard for the reinforced plastic composites industry. She added that Structural 

North America was contacted to verify infonnation provided in the 1993 EFA screening survey for 

their centrifugal casting process. Ms. Proctor pointed out that the EPA is in the process of 

establishing emission standards for all major sources of HAP that refiect maximum achievable 

control technology (MACT). She explained that the EPA is currently reviewing any pollution 

prevention or reduction measures that are being used in centrifugal casting operations, in order to 

detennine the MACT floor for this process. 

Ms. Proctor asked Mr. Ziernicki if Structural North America is using any pollution 

prevention measures for their centrifugal castmg process. She explained that such pollution 

prevention measures may include management or elimination of air flow tiirough the centrifugal 

casting machines, not heating tiie air and the resin during application and curing, and the reduction 

of hazardous air pollutants (HAP) in tiie resin. 

Mr. Ziernicki indicated that Structural North America does not move any air through the 

centrifugal casting machines during tiie entire process. He also indicated that the centrifugal casting 

machines (drums) are electrically heated to 280° F to help cure the part Mr. Ziernicki explained that 

the centrifugal casting machines arc open^tbotii end^and that the openings are 12 or 16 inches in 

"diameter depending on the part The parts produced are bases for water softening tanks. Mr. 

Ziernicki indicated that these bases are not produced for corrosion-resistant applications. 

(Contact report continued on second page) 

INFORMATION IS ACCURATE 

n 
OBP?.-., 8.19980:.?- SlPl^isiSIRyCTURflL Nfl PES RTp N c 

P.20 

NO. 723 P. 2/3)3/003 

Could yon please verify that you stiU use IS tons of polyester resin per year in 

centrifugal casting operations with a HAP content of 37.5 percent? In addition, could you 

verify that you still add I.S tons of styrene monomer to that resin at your facility? 

When Ms. Proctor asked if Structural North America's resin mixing vessels are open or 

covered, Mr. Ziernicki replied that most of their mixing vessels are open during mixing. Mr. 

Ziemieki added that a cover is placed on the mixing vessels after the mixing process is completed. 

see get*"/ 

INFORMATION IS ACCURATE Vt/f0 

3S r^^s e^ sTyfc^ MCSJC^CZ: 

\°\ 
P.21 

ATTACHMENT 2 

No. 4 Permacasting Line Total Hydrocarbon and 

Stryrene Emission Test Report 

at Henderson, Black, and Green 

Troy, Alabama 

xo 
P.22 

ADEM 

JAMES W. WARR 

DIRECTOR 

ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT

 s%rj^' : 

POST OFFICE Box 301463 • 1751 CONG. W. L.DICKINSON DRIVE 36109-2608 

MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA 36130-1463 

(334) 271-7700 

May 29, 1998 

Madeleine Strum 

USEPA 

MD-13 

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 

FOB JAMES, JR. 

GOVERNOR 

Facsimiles: (334) 

Administration: 271-7950 

Air: 279-3044 

Land: 279-3050 

Water 279-3051 

Groundwater 270-5631 

Field Operation**: 2724131 

Laboratory: 277-6718 

Education/Outreach: 213-4399 

Dear Ms. Strum: 

Enclosed, please find the styrene emissions test report conducted at Henderson, 

Black and Greene in Troy, Alabama on February 4, 1997. If you need additional 

information, please contact me at (334) 271-7861 in Montgomery. 

Sincerely, 

ester Meredith 

Engineering Services Branch 

Air Division 

110 Vulcan Road 

Birmingham. Alabama 35209-4702 

(205)942-6168 

(205) 941-1603 [Fax] 

400 Well Street. N E. • P.O Box 953 

Decatur. Alabama 35602-0953 

(205)353-1713 

(205) 340-9359 (Fax) 

2204 Perimeter Road 

Mobile. Alabama 36615-1131 

(334) 450-3400 

(334) 479-2593 (Fax] Printed on Recycled Paper -JC / 

x\ 
P.23 

Henderson, Black, and Greene, Inc. 

Troy, Alabama 36081 

No. 4 Permacasting Line Total 

Hydrocarbon and Styrene 

Emission Test Report 

February 1997 

Work Order No. 11665-002-001 

Prepared by: 

Roy F. Weston, Inc. 

1635 Pumphrey Avenue 

Auburn, Alabama 36830 

r^ 
P.24 

Work Order No. 11665-002-001 

No. 4 Permacasting Line 

Total Hydrocarbon and Styrene 

Enlission Test Report 

Henderson, Black, and Greene, Inc. 

February 1997 

Prepared For 

HENDERSON, BLACK, AND GREENE, INC. 

1015 Brundidge Blvd. 

Troy, Alabama 36081 

Prepared By 

ROY F.WESTON, INC. 

1635 Pumphrey Ave. 

Auburn, Alabama 36832-4303 

7 March 1997 

KM 1665\aH\00l\REPORT.DOC 7 March 1997 8:00 AM Version 

i-> 
P.25 

TABLE OF CONTENTS 

SECTION 1 INTRODUCTION . 1-1 

SECTION 2 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 2-1 

SECTION 3 SOURCE TESTING METHODOLOGY 3-1 

APPENDK A SAMPLE CALCULATIONS 

APPENDTX B TEST METHODOLOGY 

APPENDIX C FTELD DATA - SPINNING MACHINES, COMBINED COOLING VENT 

APPENDIX D FTELD DATA-MIXING ROOM VENT 

APPENDIX E LABORATORY DATA 

APPENDTX F QUALITY CONTROL DATA 

APPENDIX G PROCESS DATA 

LIST OF TABLES 

Table 2-1 Summary of Emission Test Results 2-1 

Table 2-2 Emission Data - Spinning Machines, Combined Cooling Vent 2-3 

Table 2-3 Emission Data - Mixing Room Vent 2-4 

Table 2-4 Analytical Data - Aromatic Hydrocarbons 2-5 

Table 3-1 Source Testing Methodology 3-1 

K:\l 1665\002\001\REPORT.DOC 7 March 1997 8:00 AM Version 

^ 
P.26 

SECTION 1 

INTRODUCTION 

Roy F. Weston, Inc. (WESTON®) was retained by Henderson, Black, and Greene, Inc. (HBG) to 

conduct total hydrocarbon (THC) and styrene emission testing on the Spinning Machines, 

Combined Cooling Vent and Mixing Room Vent at the facility in Troy, Alabama. Testing was 

conducted to quantify total styrene emissions ffom the No. 4 Permacasting Line. 

WESTON performed the emission testing on 4 February 1997 with a project team comprised of the 

following individuals. 

Name 

David Elam 

Greg Sims 

Gary Lloyd 

Bill Groeber 

| Wayne Roberts 

Jon Howard 

Sherrie Walker 

Project Role 

Project Director 

Project Manager 

Technical Director 

Process Engineer 

Test Team Leader 

Test Team Member 

Data Reduction and Reporting 

Mr. Geoff McDuffie of HBG coordinated the testing with mill operations and served as WESTON's 

technical contact throughout the effort. Mr. Lester Meredith of Alabama Department of 

Environmental Management (ADEM) was present during a portion ofthe testing. 

This report is organized into three sections and supporting appendices. Section 2 summarizes the 

test program results. Section 3 references the sampling and analytical procedures used to perform 

the test program. Supporting data are provided in the appendices. 

K:\) 1665\002\001\REPORT.DOC 7 March 1997 8:00 AM Version 1-1 

15 
P.27 

SECTION 2 

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 

Table 2-1 summarizes the results of the emission testing. Tables 2-2 and 2-3 present the detailed 

test results for each ofthe selected emission points. Some differences between the calculated results 

shown in the appendices and the reported results in the summary tables are due to rounding the 

results for presentation. 

TABLE 2-1 

SUMMARY OF EMISSION TEST RESULTS 

Spinning Machines, Combined Cooling Vent 

Total Hydrocarbons, as Styrene 

Concentration, ppm 

Emission Rate, lb/hr 

31 

0.10 

Mixing Room Vent 

Total Hydrocarbons, as Styrene 

Concentration, ppm 

Emission Rate, lb/hr 

31 

7.6 

Total Styrene Emission Rate, lb/hr 7.7 

Emission Factors 

lb Styrene/lb Prepared Polymer Input 

lb Styrene/lb Styrene Input 

0.005 

0.037 

In addition to testing the selected emission points for THC emissions, two samples were collected 

from each source, within the time frame of the THC testing, and analyzed for selected aromatic 

hydrocarbons. The aromatic hydrocarbon analysis indicated that styrene comprised an average 

concentration equivalent to 96 percent of the total aromatic hydrocarbons present in the source gas 

streams. The results ofthe aromatic hydrocarbons testing are presented in Table 2-4. 

A review of the process operating data indicates that during the testing, a solvent (containing 

primarily toluene and xylenes) was used to clean equipment. A review of the data presented in 

Table 2-4 shows these compounds comprise the majority ofthe non-styrene aromatic hydrocarbons. 

A THC response factor for styrene was detennined, after the testing had been completed, using the 

same analyzer and propane calibration gas mixtures. A certified styrene gas mixture was presented 

to the calibrated THC analyzer and the THC (as carbon) response was recorded. Styrene emission 

K:\l I665\002\OOI\REPORT.DOC 7 March 1997 8:00 AM Version 

U* 

2-1 
P.28 

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 

rates were then calculated from the THC as carbon emissions, by assuming the total emissions were 

styrene and applying the measured styrene response factor. 

Testing was performed during operation of the process under normal operating conditions. Testing 

was interrupted due to a scheduled outage (lunch break). Testing was resumed after the break and 

the results from each test period were averaged to represent a complete cycle (time weighted). A 

process description with the total production rate and material input, used to calculate the emission 

factors, has been included in Appendix G. 

•^ K>t" W {^

 0[J^y-A

-

A

-

 c^'¥*\ 

KM 1665\OH\001\REPORT.DOC 7 March 1997 8:00 AM Version 2-2 
P.29 

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 

TABLE 2-2 

EMISSION DATA - SPINNING MACHINES, COMBINED COOLING VENT 

Date 

Time Began 

Time Ended 

Stack Gas Data 

Temperature, °F 

Velocity, ft/sec 

Moisture, % 

CO2 Concentration, % 

O2 Concentration, % 

VFR, dscfm 

Process Input 

lb Prepared Polymer/hr 

lb Styrene/hr 

Total Hydrocarbons, as carbon 

Concentration, ppm 

Emission Rate, lb/hr 

Total Hydrocarbons, as styrene 

Concentration, ppm 

Emission Rate, lb/hr 

Runl 

2/4/97 

0657 

1130 

66 

2.0 

1.9 

0.0 

20.8 

208 

1,609 

206 

215 

0.08 

30 

0.10 

Run 2 

2/4/97 

1200 

,1530 

66 

2.0 

1.9 

0.0 

20.8 

202 

1,609 

206 

229 

0.09 

32 

0.11 

Mean 

""*• 

66 

2.0 

1.9 

0.0 

20.8 

205 

1,609 

206 

221a 

0.08a 

31a 

0.10a 

Time weighted average. 

KM I665\002\001\REPORT.DOC 7 March 1997 8:00 AM Version 

V( 

2-3 
P.30 

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 

TABLE 2-3 

EMISSION DATA - MDONG ROOM VENT 

Date 

Time Began 

Time Ended 

2/4/97 

0657 

1130 

2/4/97 

1200 

1530 

Mean 

Stack Gas Data 

Temperature, °F 

Velocity, ft/sec 

Moisture, % 

VFR, dscfm 

62 

41 

1.7 

15,100 

70 

41 

2.2 

14,700 

67 

41 

2.0 

14,900 

Process Input 

lb Prepared Polymer/hr 

lb Styrene/Shift 

1,609 

206 

1,609 

206 

1,609 

206 

Total Hydrocarbons, as carbon 

Concentration, ppm 

Emission Rate, lb/hr 

214 

6.0 

230 

6.3 

222a 

6.2a 

Total Hydrocarbons, as styrene 

Concentration, ppm 

Emission Rate, lb/hr 

Time weighted average. 

30 

7.4 

33 

7.8 

31a 

7.6a 

K:\l 1665\002\001\REPORT.DOC 7 March 1997 8:00 AM Version 

1^ 

2-4 
P.31 

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 

TABLE 2-4 

ANALYTICAL DATA - AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS 

Aromatic Hydrocarbons8 

Styrene, ppm 

Toluene, ppm 

Ethyl Benzene, ppm 

Xylenes, ppm 

Sum of Aromatic Hydrocarbons, ppm 

Styrene Concentration, % 

Spinning Machines, 

Combined Cooling Vent 

Runl 

192 

1.2 

1.0 

3.0 

197 

| 97 

Run 2 

155 

0.9 

0.6 

2.1 

159 

97 

Mixing Room Vent 1 

Runl 

25 

0.7 

b 

0.3 

26 

96 

Run 2 [ 

18 | 

1.5 I 

b 1 

0.2 

20 

| 90 

"Cumene, benzene, a-methyl styrene, butyl-toluene, vinyl-toluene and naphthalene were not detected. 

''Ethyl benzene was not detected on the mixing room vent 

K:\l 1665\002V001\REPORT.DOC 7 March 1997 8:00 AM Version 

3o 

2-5 
P.32 

SECTION 3 

SOURCE TESTING METHODOLOGY 

The emission testing program was conducted in accordance with the methods indicated in 

Table 3-1. Detailed method descriptions and quality assurance data are provided in the referenced 

appendix. 

TABLE 3-1 

SOURCE TESTING METHODOLOGY 

Parameter 

Volumetric Flow Rate 

Total Hydrocarbons and Styrene 

| Aromatic Hydrocarbons 

Method 

Number 

EPA 1,2,3,4 

EPA 25A 

NIOSH 1501 

Appendix Reference 

Method 

Description 

B.1 

B.2 

B.3 

Quality 

Control 

Data 

F 

F 

F 

| 

Comments 

Notei 

Modified, Note 2 [ 

Notes: 

1. Styrene emissions were calculated using a response factor for the THC analysis. A known 

concentration of styrene was introduced to an analyzer and the response recorded in units of propane 

concentration. The calculated response factor is a ratio of the known styrene concentration to the 

resulting carbon equivalent value (propane response x 3 = carbon equivalent). 

2. A moisture knockout impinger was placed in series with the charcoal tube for the collection of the 

aromatic hydrocarbons. The impinger and probe were quantitatively rinsed with methylene chloride 

after each test run. The methylene chloride rinse fraction was analyzed in addition to the charcoal tube 

(after extraction with methylene chloride) and the mass of target compound found for each fraction 

were added to give the total mass for the sample. A desorption efficien-;"/ study for NIOSH 1501 

compounds is on file with the WESTON laboratory performing the analyse. 

K:U I665\002\OOI\REPORT.DOC 7 March 1997 8:00 AM Version 

31 

3-1 
*. Apjiendlx.A;; i^i'. 
P.34 

APPENDIX A 

SAMPLE CALCULATIONS 

K;\l 1665\002\001\REPORT.DOC 7 Mirch 1997 8*00 AM Version ^ __^ 

33 
P.35 

APPENDIX A 

SAMPLE CALCULATIONS 

Mixing Tank Room Vent 

Run No. 1 

I. Absolute Stack Gas Pressure (Ps), in. Hg 

Pg Ps = Pb + 13.6 in. H20 / in. Hg 

where, Pb = barometric pressure, in. Hg 

Pg = Static Pressure, in. H20 

Ps = 30.00in.Hg + -°J(>in.H20 = 2999ituH 

13.6 in. H20 / iru Hg 

IL Molecular Weight (DRY) (Md), lb/lb-mole 

Md - (0.44x%CO2) + (0.32 x%02) + (0.28(100 - %C02 - %02)) 

Md = (0.44x0.0) + (0.32x20.8) + (0.28(100 -20.8 - 0.0)) = 28.83 lb / lb • mole 

in. Molecular Weight (WET) (Ms), lb/lb-mole 

Mi = Md (7 - Bws) + 78 (Bws) where, Md = molecular weight (DRY), lb/lb-mole 

Bws = moisture fraction, dimensionless 

Ms = 28.83 lb /lb -mole (1 - 0.0148) + 18(0.0148) = 28.67 lb /lb - mole 

IV. Average Velocity (Vs), ft/sec 

Vs = 85.49 -i - J- — x Cp x -J Delta P avg. x .1 

sec V (°R)(in.H20) \Psx_ Ms 

where, Cp = pitot tube coefficient 

Delta P = velocity head of stack gas, in. H20 

Ts = absolute stack temperature, °R 

Ps = absolute stack gas pressure, in. Hg 

Ms = molecular weight of stack gas, lb/lb-mole 

Vs m 85A9 JL UWtlb-nmOUHim 

sec V (°R)(in.HJ 

Vs = 41.34 ft /sec 

in. Hg) 

O) 

x 0.84 x 0.7332 in. H2Oxj 521 °R 

29.99 in. Hg x 28.67 lb/lb- mole 

KM 1665\002\00l\REPORT.DOC 7 March 1997 8:00 AM Version -y\ A-l 
P.36 

mwi—^^ / ammmm rnmi w APPENDIX A 

V. Average Stack Gas Flow at Stack Conditions (Qa), acf/min 

Qa = 60 sec/ min x Vs x As where, Vs = stack gas velocity, ft/sec 

As = cross-sectional area of stack, ft2 

Qa = 60sec/min x41.34ft/sec x 6.21ft2 = 1.54E + 04 acf/min 

VI. Average Stack Gas Flow at Standard Conditions (Qs), dscf/min 

Qs = 17.647 — — x Qa x (1 - Bws) x — . 

in. Hg Ts 

where, Qa = average stack gas flow at stack condidons, ftVmin 

Bws = moisture content (dimensionless) 

Ps = absolute stack gas pressure, in. Hg 

Ts = absolute stack temperature, °R 

Qs = 77.647 — — xl.54E + 04,^- x (1 - 0.0748) x 29-

99lTlHS = 1.52E + 04 dscf/min 

iruHg -min 521 °R 

VTI. THC Concentration dry as Propane (P), ppm OiL/L) 

THC dry as P = —— — = 721 _ 71.4ppm(uL/L) 

(1 - Bws) (1 - 0.0148) yy 

where Bws = moisture fraction, dimensionless 

VUl. THC Concentration dry as Carbon (C), ppm (jiL/L) 

THCdryasC = THCdryasPppm x 3 = 71.4ppm x 3 = 274.7 

IX. THC Emission Rate (THC EMR), lb/hr as Carbon 

THCdryasC x MW x Qs x 60 — x 28.32 -pTHC EMR = • — •* 

24.04 - x l.OxlO6 ^ x 454 •$-

g - mole L lb 

where, THC dry as C = THC conc. dry as Carbon, ppm (nL/L) 

MW = molecular weight of carbon, 12.01 g/g-mole 

Qs = stack gas flow at std. cond., dscf/min 

274 & x 12.01 —I — x 1.51E + 04^x60^x 28.32 ±j 

THC EMR = £ £12 £ : EJ £ tL. = 6.03 lb/hr 

24.04 x l.OxlO6 =- x 454 -^-

g - mole L lb 

KAI 166S\002\001\REPORT.DOC 7 March 1997 8:00 AM Version """2 C A- 2 35 
P.37 

APPENDIX A 

X. THC Concentration as Styrene (St), ppm (nL/L) 

THC as St, ppm = THC as Cppm x Response Factor = 214.1 ppm x 0.742 

= 30.40ppm 

where, Response Factor is from the styrene conversion 

CEMS data (0.142 ppm styrene/1 ppm carbon) 

XI. THC Emission Rate (THC EMR), lb/hr as Styrene 

THC dry as St x MW x Qs x 60 — x 28.32 ^ 

THC EMR = r - ^ —£— 

24.04 - x LOx l(f Z=- x 454 ±-

g - mole L lb 

where, THC dry as St = THC conc. dry as Styrene, ppm (nL/L) 

MW = molecular weight of styrene, 104.14 g/g-mole 

Qs = stack gas flow at std. cond., dscf/min 

30.40 ^ x 104.14 ^ x 1.5IE + 04 ^ - x 60 — x 28.32 -^rL g-mole min hr ft* 

THC EMR = -—7 -r J— = 7.43 lb/hr 

24.04 x 7.0x l& =- x 454 -£-

g - mole L lb 

XII. THC Emission Rate as Styrene (St), Ib styrene/lb prepared polymer 

„,„ „ THC as St. lb/hr 7.43 lb / hr ^ „_ n j lb stvrene 

THC as St = • Process • ——= •—• -4.62E-03- Input, lb prepared polymer / hr 1608.8S lb prepared polymer / hr lb prepared polymer 

XIII. THC Emission Rate as Styrene (St) time weighted average, Ib/hr 

Run 1 THC as St, — x Run 1 time, hr + Run 2 THC as St. — x Run 2 time, hr 

THC average = ^ =—7= 7 ~ — 

Total Time, hr 

7.43 — x 4.5hr + 7.78 — x 3.5hr ., 

THC average = ^ ^ = 7.58 — 

8hr hr 

K:\11665\002\00l\REPORT.DOC7March 1997 8:00 AM Version A- 3 
mymyymmymmymmammymy 

*•"*••*••.•.*• ••?;..•: ,:*'»• ;*..v.^=^xi>;:t*-i-••,*:.w?-t:*s*fe^:****!^*K*?ia*-*^*K***-:;-

31 
P.39 

APPENDIX B 

TEST METHODOLOGY 

B.1 VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE 

B.2 TOTAL HYDROCARBONS 

B.3 AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS 

KW 1665\002\001\REPORT.DOC 7 March 1997 8*00 AM Version 
P.40 

APPENDIX B 

B.l VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE 

Mass emission rates are calculated by multiplying measured target analyte concentrations by 

calculated volumetric flow rates. Volumetric flow rates are calculated using measurement data 

obtained by EPA Reference Mediods 1-4. 

The ductwork is measured at the sample location to the nearest 0.25 inch using a steel tape measure. 

Traverse points are selected in accordance with EPA Reference Method 1 on the basis of ductwork 

dimensions, geometry, and upstream and downstream disturbances. When a sample location does 

not meet EPA Reference Method 1 criteria, the maximum recommended number of traverse points 

are used. 

Gas Velocity 

The velocity of the gas stream is measured in accordance with EPA Reference Method 2 by reading 

the instantaneous velocity pressure with an inclined manometer at each traverse point using either a 

standard "P" type or an "S" type pitot tube. The stack pressure is calculated from the measured 

static pressure of the stack and the ambient barometric pressure. The static pressure is measured by 

using the static side of the pitot tube, and the barometric pressure is measured using a calibrated 

aneroid barometer. Magnahelic® gauges with scales of 0 to 5 and 0 to 25 inches of water or an 

inclined manometer with a scale of 0 to 10 inches of water are used for velocity pressure 

measurements. Manometer selection is determined by the velocity pressure of the gas stream. A 

manometer with a 0 to 0.25 inch scale may be used when the velocity pressure of the gas stream is 

less than 0.02 inches of water. By convention, any measured velocity pressures of less than 

0.005 inches of water are recorded and reported as less than 0.005 inches of water. The stack 

temperature is measured with a calibrated thermocouple and pyrometer. 

For low velocity pressure measurements (less than 0.005 inches of water) a hot wire anemometer may 

be used to measure the velocity of the gas stream. The indicated velocity is used without correction 

when the gas stream is ambient air with a moisture content of less than 65%. The indicated velocity is 

corrected in accordance with procedures specified by the manufacturer when the moisture content 

exceeds 65% or when the dry gas fraction is something other than ambient air. 

Gas Composition and Moisture Content 

The composition of the gas stream is measured in accordance with EPA Reference Method 3 using 

an Orsat or Fyrite Combustion Gas Analyzer. Gas composition determinations are conducted using 

either integrated or grab sampling techniques. 

Grab samples are analyzed using a Fyrite analyzer by withdrawing a gas sample from the source and 

introducing the sample directly to a zeroed oxygen or carbon dioxide combustion gas analyzer. 

After introduction of the gas sample, the analyzer is inverted the prescribed number of times and the 

KAI 1665\002\001\REPORT.DOC 7 March 1997 8:00 AM Version , - /-\ B- l 

51 
P.41 

APPENDDC B 

analyzer fluid level is recorded giving a percent by volume determination of the oxygen or carbon 

dioxide concentrations. 

Integrated samples are collected by withdrawing a sample from the source through a moisture 

condenser into a Tedlar® sample bag. The bag is then analyzed using an Orsat analyzer. 

The moisture content ofthe gas stream is determined using one ofthe following procedures: 

• For sources requiring testing by EPA Reference or Test Methods 5, 8, 12,13,17, 23, 26A, 

29,0010, or 0011, moisture is detennined by EPA Reference Method 4. At the conclusion 

of each run the volume of condensed moisture in the impingers of the sampling train is 

measured and used to calculate the moisture content ofthe gas stream. 

• For sources with temperatures greater than 212 °F, the approximation technique described 

in EPA Reference Method 4 may be used with midget impingers to condense moisture 

before dry gas volume measurement. 

• For sources with a temperature of less than 212 °F, wet bulb/dry bulb temperature 

measurements may be made, and the moisture content calculated using vapor pressure 

tables. 

When multiple methods are used for moisture determinations, the lowest moisture value is used for 

volumetric flow calculations. 

The molecular weight of the gas stream is calculated using the measured moisture, oxygen, and 

carbon dioxide concentrations. The balance of the gas stream is assumed to be nitrogen. The 

volumetric flow is then calculated at stack and standard conditions using the calculated molecular 

weight, the measured stack temperature, and measured velocity, stack and barometric pressures. 

Standard conditions are 68 °F and 29.92 inches of mercury and 0% moisture. 

Data Acquisition and Reporting 

Data are recorded at the time of collection on preprinted data sheets. Calculations are performed 

(where possible) with preprogrammed calculators or spreadsheet software. 

Oualitv Control 

Quality control procedures for volumetric flow measurements involve leak checks of pitot tubes, 

pitot tube lines and manometers; periodic analysis of ambient air and duplicate analysis of source 

gas samples with the Fyrite analyzer; triplicate analysis with the Orsat analyzer; and periodic 

calibration checks of thermocouples and pyrometers. 

K:\11665V102\001\REPORT.DOC7March 1997 8:00 AM Version (_£-» B- 2 fo 
P.42 

APPENDDCB 

Data transfers are minimized. Data sheets are checked for completeness and accuracy. Calculations 

are verified by a second person. 

B.2 TOTAL HYDROCARBON CONCENTRATION 

Total hydrocarbon (THC) concentrations are sampled using EPA Reference Method 25 A and analyzed 

by WESTON on site with a flame ionization detector (FID) analyzer. It should be noted that Method 

25A determines total organics, including methane, which is not a regulated volatile organic compound 

(VOC). 

Sampling Equipment and Procedures 

Figure B-l is a schematic of the EPA Reference Method 25A sampling system. An extractive system 

is used at the sampling locations to obtain vent gas samples. Samples are withdrawn continuously at a 

single point and transported to the FTD through a heated probe Teflon® filter, and heated Teflon® 

sample line. All hydrocarbon measurements are made on a "hot, wet" basis. 

Sample Anaivsis 

A TECO Model 51 total hydrocarbon analyzer is used to measure the total hydrocarbon concentration 

in the source gas. This analyzer utilizes a FID as described by EPA Reference Method 25A. The 

technique is not selective between species, and the results are reported as carbon volume equivalents of 

the calibration gas (propane in nitrogen or propane in air). 

Prior to each test, the sampling and analytical system are calibrated using two calibration gases (zero 

and 80 to 90 percent of span). This step is followed by a calibration error check utilizing two 

additional cahbration gases at approximately 25 and 45 percent of the span value. The acceptance 

criterion for the cahbration error check is less than 5% the certified gas value. 

Data Acquisition and Reduction 

Data is acquired electronically using an IBM compatible computer and software designed by 

WESTON for EPA Reference Method 25A analysis. 

Oualitv Control 

The calibration and check gases are propane, in either nitrogen or air, certified according to EPA 

Protocol-1. Following each sample run, the calibration drift of the system is checked by introducing 

the zero and one upscale gas to the system and recording the response. This difference in 

concentration must be within five percent of the full scale span value. 

K:\tl665\002\001\REPORT.DOC 7 March 1997 8:00 AM Version B- 3 

4\ 
?*: 

< 

8. 

1° 

£ 

^ 

^ STACK 

£ WALL 

HEATED 

SAMPLE 

UNE 

HEATED 

RLTER 

HEATED 

UNE 

DATA 

ACQUISITION 

SYSTEM 

TOTAL HYDROCARBON 

RD ANALYZER 

DATA 

OUTPUT 

r 

HEATED 

TEFLON 

PUMP 

CAUBRATION GAS UNE 

GAS MANIFOLD 

W Ur lr lr I* 

CAUBRATION GASES 

Figure B-l EPA Reference Method 2SA Sampling System 

W 

•** 

co 
P.44 

APPENDDC B 

B.3 AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS 

Sampling and analysis are performed using the guidelines described in NIOSH Method 1501. 

Aromatic hydrocarbons include: benzene, p-tert-butyl toluene, cumene, ethyl benzene, amethylstyrene, naphthalene, styrene, toluene, vinyl-toluene, and xylenes. 

Sampling Equipment and Procedures 

Samples are withdrawn from the source at a flow rate between 0.2 and 1.0 L/min through a Teflon® 

probe and Une to a coconut shell charcoal sorbent tube. The tube contains 100 mg of charcoal in the 

front section and 50 mg in the back section. The two sections of the tube are separated by a 2-mm 

urethane foam plug. A silylated glass wool plug precedes the front section and 3-mm urethane foam 

plug follows the back section. The outlet of the sorbent tube is connected to a leak free vacuum 

pump and calibrated rotometer. 

Following a successful leak check, the initial rotometer reading and samphng system barometric 

pressure are recorded at the start of gas stream collection. The temperature at the rotometer is 

recorded periodically. After completion of the sampling procedure, the final rotometer reading is 

recorded. A post-test leak check is performed and the sorbent tubes are sealed and placed on ice 

prior to shipment to the laboratory for analysis. 

Sample Anaivsis 

The front and back sections of the sorbent tube are extracted separately. The fraction adsorbed from 

the gas stream is extracted, separated, and measured by GC/FLD. 

Data Acquisition and Reduction 

Data are recorded at the time of collection on preprinted data sheets. Where possible, calculations 

are performed with preprogrammed calculators or spreadsheet software. 

Oualitv Control 

An unused sorbent tube is retained and analyzed as a blank. Ten percent of all samples are analyzed 

in duplicate to demonstrate repeatability of laboratory results. 

Prior to and following each run the sampling train is leak checked. A leakage rate not in excess of 

2% of the average sampling rate is acceptable for the pre-run check. If a leak is detected in the post 

run check, the test run is voided, or acceptable procedures are made to adjust sample volume for the 

leakage. Initial, post-test and continuing calibration are performed. The rotometer calibration is 

included in the final report. Sample volumes are corrected to standard temperature and pressure to 

obtain the dry standard sample volume. 

K:V11665\002\001\REPORT.DOC 7 March 1997 8:00 AM Version _ B-5 
P.45 

APPENDDC B 

Data transfers are minimized. Field and laboratory data sheets are checked for completeness and 

accuracy. Calculations are verified by a second person. 

KAI 1665\002\001\REPORT.DOC 7 March 1997 8:00 AM Version (J'L w C B-6 
v

- , '"-••• ^ Mfiy$ 
P.47 

APPENDIX C 

FIELD DATA - SPINNING MACHINES, 

COMBINED COOLING VENT 

KM 1665\002\001\REPORT.DOC 7 March 1997 8:00 AM Version 

^b 
THC as Styrene Emissions 

P.48 

Process Input, lb prepared polymer/hr 

Process Input, Ib styrene/hr eg) ) 

_^'_r^__mZ^i£g_____*_i_?_^m_^x?-T_7*'Vr' 

~ SpmningMachine 

Combined Cooling Vent 

Mixing Room 

Vent 

Ave. Emission Rate, lb/hr as styrene* 

Ave. Emission Rate, lb styrene/lb prepared polymer input* 

Ave. Emission Rate, lb styrene/lb styrene input* 

'Time weighted average. 

^ . -0.10 ' W -v •-• 

7.58 

.5*. 

•?i|iv.'* 

;Tiotal 

V1S08.85 

..,•306.22. ns% 

4&8&03 

K:\11665\002\O01\MRVO2.XLS 

M~7 

C-1 

Pfinteo on: 3/7/97 3:47 AM 
P.49 

THC EMISSION CALCULATIONS 

Client: 

Location: 

Weston W.O. No.: 

HB&G 

Troy, AL 

11665-002-001 

Source Code : Spinning Machine Combined Cooling Vent 

Run Number 

Date 

Time Began 

Time Ended 

Volumetric Flow Rate, dscfm* 

Moisture (Bws) 

Response Factor, (Styrene/Carbon) 

Total Hydrocarbon 

Concentration, ppm wet as propane 

Concentration, ppm dry as propane 

Molecular Weignt of C, ug/ug-mole 

Concentration, ppm dry as C 

Emission Rate, lb/hr as Cb 

Styrene 

Molecular Weight of styrene, ug/ug-mole 

b.c 

1 

2/4/97 

0657 

1130 

2.08E+02 

0.019 

0.142 

2 

2/4/97 

1200 

1530 

2.02E+02 

0.019 

0.142 

Average 

2.05E+02 

0.013 

0.142 

70.3 

71.7 

12.01 

215.0 

0.084 

104.14 

30.53 

0.103 

75.0 

76.5 

12.01 

229.4 

0.087 

104.14 

32.57 

0.107 

72.7 

74.1 

12.01 

221 

0.085 

104.14 

31.4 

0.105 

Concentration, ppm dry as styrene 

Emission Rate, lb/hr as styreneb 

' Run 1 and 2 VMF from average of Runs 1 and 2 of velocity traverse data. 

bTime weighted average. 

c

 Styrene concentration calculated using the measured THC response factor of 1 ppm C - 0.142 ppm styrene. 

K:\1-66S\002\001\SMCH01.XLS % 

C-2 

Printed on: 3/7/97 3:SS AM 
P.50 

EMISSION CALCULATIONS 

Client 

Location 

Weston W.O. No. 

Source 

Run Number 

Date 

Time Began 

Time Ended 

Styrene 

Molecular Weight, ug/ug-mole 

Corrected Sample Volume, L 

Mass of Sample, jag 

Concentration, ppm 

Toluene 

Molecular Weight, ng/|ig-mole 

Corrected Sample Volume, L 

Mass of Sample, jig 

Concentration, ppm 

Ethyl benzene 

Molecular Weight, |ig/|ig-rnole 

Corrected Sample Volume, L 

Mass of Sample, ng 

Concentration, ppm 

Xylenes 

Molecular Weight, jig/|ig-mole 

Corrected Sample Volume, L 

Mass of Sample, ng 

Concentration, ppm 

HB&G 

Troy, AL 

11665-002-001 

Spinning Machine Combined Cooling Vent 

1 

2/4/97 

0846 

0946 

104.14 

12.03 

10000 

191.9 

92.10 

12.03 

56.0 

12 

106.20 

12.03 

52.0 

1.0 

106.20 

12.03 

160.0 

3.0 

2 

2/4/97 

1250 

1350 

104.14 

11.94 

8000 

154.7 

92.10 

11.94 

42.0 

0.9 

106.20 

11.94 

32.0 

0.6 

106.20 

11.94 

110.0 

2.1 

Sample volume equivalent of styrene, % 97 98 

K:\1166S\O02\00l\SMCHO1.XLS 

^ 

C-3 

Pflnwe* on: 3/7/97 3:12 AM 
P.51 

VELOCITY CALCULATIONS 

Client: HB & G 

Location: Troy, AL 

WESTON Project No.: 11665-002-001 

Source: SMCCV 

Run Number 

Date 

Time Began 

Time Ended 

1 2 

2/3/97 _ 2/3/97 

1300 1400 

Average 

Volumetric Flow Data 

Velocity, ft/min 

Point 1 

Point 2 

Point 3 

Point 4 

Point 5 

Point 6 

Point 7 

Point 8 

Point 9 

Point 10 

Point 11 

Point 12 

Point 13 

Point 14 

Point 15 

* Point 16 

Point 17 

Point 18 

Point 19 

Point 20 

Point 21 

Point 22 

Point 23 

Point 24 

Average Velocity, ft/min 

Barometric Pressure, (Pb).in. Hg 

Static Pressure. (Pg) in. H20 

Stack Pressure (Ps). in. Hg 

Stack Diameter (l.D.), in. 

Stack Cross Sectional Area, ft2 

MFR. std. temp, for anemometer. °R 

Stack Gas 

Temperature (ts), °F 

Moisture. (BWS) 

C02 Concentration (C02). % 

02 Concentration (02), % 

Molecular Weight (Ms), lb/lb-mole 

Velocity (Vs), ft/sec 

Volumetric Flow Rate, 

At Stack Conditions (Qa), ACFM 

At Standard Conditions (Qs), DSCFM 

k'.l I665W2\OOI\SMHOVEL.XLS 

100 

75 

75 

75 

75 

100 

125 

150 

250 

250 

250 

200 

75 

75 

75 

75 

75 

100 

100 

100 

150 

150 

150 

100 

123 

30.00 

0.0 

30.00 

17.75 

1.72 

530 

60 

0.0149 

0.0 

20.8 

28.67 

2.0 

207 

208 

75 

75 

100 

100 

100 

100 

150 

150 

250 

200 

200 

200 

75 

75 

100 

200 

100 

100 

100 

75 

100 

75 

100 

100 

121 

30.00 

0.0 

30.00 

17.75 

1.72 

530 

71 

0.0239 

0.0 

20.8 

28.57 

• 2.0 

208 

202 

122 

30.00 

0.0 

30.00 

17.75 

1.72 

530 

66 

0.019 

0.0 

20.8 

28.62 

2.0 

208 

205 

So 

c-n 

Primed On: 3/7/97 
coi rem ^CH o 

wni r TtniB m MO Urrr-ua\*rt_ 

VELOC 

STACK DIAM 

PTTOT TUBE < 

SKETCH 

NOTES 

P. 

P » B * —*-

' ' 13.6 

H4 - 0.44<%CO,) • O320(%O2) 

* O280(%*Vt * %C0) 

* , - Mt (l-J ^ • «• « 

Vt - 8S.49C, /Sfa f 

T, 

<?.«<?,u - ^f r • » H 

i,-*****—* 

1 t, m Aur m ••»«•• • ^ •• ^ ' 

1 T,.*V»«n»m'V—"<«"* ^ 

1 p . tiarlr mnr nnani. a HJO 

Pt m AbaotaM mttk yimtim. m Hg 

M,'» Molwatar *«««h» of «o**efc ••« *T *•*•• j^? " * 

M, - Mota-Ml* ""ifh* «* *•«* «•• *•*•*-• **^* IW**0" 

V, - Av-trat* tack pm fttoeity. tttmm 

A , - An«rf«nck.f^ 

Q^ * VuhuiMUk, flow iw, actWa 

Q, > VolaMric ftow ft*. ihcVmm a 

* „ . W*MT *•** ia f » •«*«•. pt^"***" *•* * - — " 

Pwe of 

S.lJMMIMaWCMtcrAiaiRM TAU1 Wl 

ITY TRAVERSE DAIA 

wnDrnPTlRBNO. MW.S-Oo2-Oo I 

M i7.7 S STA<XAR£A(tf> /;?2 . 

COEFFICIENT THERMO/LCD ID NOS. ^22£2L _ 

1 BJN NO. » ., 

I DATB ^-a-^7 

TMB 

UcDirr 

wcwirr 

•fflBlU 

P,(laK£> 

o w* 

CO. * 

FT *« 

n. 

3 

M 

1 r 

1 ^ 

" 

6 

7 

"8 

f 

/O 

II 

\T. 

1 

2. 

J * " 

r" 1 H 

SAP**! 

J 

UJ 

n 

s-

«T 

AO 

H 

\z 

U * l 

t. (i« Hf) 

*** 

I M. (IMbHoaW 

1 MfdWIb^Mii) 

1 V, (MR | 

1 O, (acta) 

Q,«lKft*l 

feO 

30.OO 

© . o 

o .O 

•f*TW 1 » 

IP© 

7.5 

7 S 

7 5 

7 5 

/bo 

I2S 

/SO 

zro 

2So 

tJO 

z.oc> 

7"? 

7? 

75 

?S 

7S 

/oo . 

/ftO 

cy*5 

«. 

. 

^ o 1 

f f 0 

!

5

° 

MO 

30.0 0 

,D»M«? . 

^ -

PS 

--£ 2 

s/ 

*Y 

•.^ ^ 

*i>.os 

/ 

oot, 

2 

2-M-S T 

/VCO 

J*" 

•>v&r Ti 

O .O 

ZO.*f" 

•O. D 

75 

7 S 

i o o 

/ o o 

/ o O 

/ S O 

/ s o 

•zso 

E OO 

Z O O 

E D O 

s 

• 

7 " ^ I 

? * 

/9° 

z o o 

/ O O 

/9° 

/t>0 

? 5 

/oo . 

7,5 

(OO 

no 

IZ\ 

^o.oO 

.01 ^ 

rx.irA 

3*.S7 

• j. 0 

o?o7 

ao3 . 

*7\

 C '5 

j 

__o i 

1 1 

-

58 i 
P.53 

MOISTURE IN STACK GAS BY WET BULB - DRY BULB MEASUREMENT 

PLANT )A & Q-6 LOCATION TfOM.^L . 

STACK .6i^v\C-HO RUN 1,2., ^ DATE Z-H^ l 

OPERATOR -v-3<2-

Barometric Pressure (Hg) 

Static Pressure (in H,0) 

Absolute Pressure of Stack 

13.6 

Wet Bulb Temperature (°F) 

Dry Bulb Tenperature (T) 

Temp Difference (Td-Tw) 

Vapor Pressure of H20 at Tw 

Partial Pressure of H20 » PP 

P 

P. 

Tw 

T, 

£j 

VP 

PP = ( VP) 

PP ».( ) -

(P, - KP) (At) 

2800 - (1.3) (r„) 

( )( ) _ 

2800 - (IJ) (7".} 

o.spH inHg 

Moisture by volume « M 

M (PP 

CP, 

(100) . 1 2 (ioo) = /'&% 

Page of 

3Q.O Q 

2-Q. 

§&oo_ 

6^3 

7D 

o^p 

3<>-00 

7/ 

7 5-

i 

-wr 

y 

6.-7W2 

•LVttK 

o.so</y 

^H-

/.a 

O.lPC 

<j.6£j:r*i 

l:*<)Er4EltAI.NAOMNF0«M(rA*J».nM 4 m 

5-2-

_"»Hg 

_inH20 

_inHg 

JnHg 

JF 

_inHg 

C-6 
P.54 

PRELIMINARY VELOCITY DATA 

I 

•TI.IENT Hfa-f o 

SOURCE *rr*J*Q 

WORK ORDER NO. nu^-OP^•pn l 

DATE A-3-9 7 

DUCT DATA 

DM. from far w«0 

te o«t«Uc ef pert 

Nlppk kngik 

Depdi «f Dect 

Width rf decl (nc) 

Asearf decl 

/ V- 7.5 

/7.7 S 

TT 

.ta. 

ta. 

'ta. 

• 

ta. 

Eqehrtkal *£amckr 

3 x (fee* t wMJ** 

*fcplfc • wU* 

Dt*L from MM M 

diMnAmct ie pern 

•A* *r 

t ) • ( > ft 

SKETCH qfJIAOL MEASUREMENTS 

• ef 

-^2-

/D. S 

n.A 

32-S 

S^g 4» 

/•far t? 

•g-.nM 

6>7.7 

yo.(o 

8*T.5 

S.73» 

«f*MM 

K> 

iZ.QL 

'H-w-

: 2 L 

»5-8*1 

il.)R 

CIRCULAR DUCTS 

Ike***. 

•ffMckl 

RECTANGULAR DUCTS 

, « i « t t t it ti w 

I MJ IU IM U « U M M U « 

1 M HJ M UJ IM IM IU •» «M I" 

1 UJ tU M iU M* HJ »J IM IU IU 

4 . nj IM *KJ »J OJ mt n» IIJ iu 

i . ot nj to mi »J «*» « M «•» 

« „j WJ « J «u «* »» iu 

t (U MJ TU «M »J 1U 

, tu tu ttt OJ OJ 

t .. . . tM tu nj mt 

„ .... . OJ tM IM 

•• . . . t u t»J 

II

 m 

Page Of 

M J 

T it 

t U 

l<U ft 

I M 

I M 

U J 

t u 

J L J L 

u 

l t d 

1*4 

t u 

fll.T 

11 

u 

u 

I4J 

U J 

MS 

• U 

TIA 

tU 

t I J 

f M 

U 

• u 

I U 

IT.T 

SJ) 

O J 

t U 

T U 

tu 

•J 

ni 

tu 

l:*C******^AL"A*D*MN»*OtkM*A«.*».*F**«M t..fcW IM I 

53 C - 7 
P.55 

•* -i.* - : *<••••> • 

• •"• . * -*£^'^V**^.?-.'*...Vl;>-V!rt?**i.*.. . /. 

SAMPLE FLOW FIELD DATA 

Client /JB+G 

Location Sfiw^ rOAcAi'ne GwU«/ tie*<ler rtr+L'tW.0.# ^ 

Source Code 

Test Personnel J H /u)R 

Date 

Time Began 

Time End 

Sample Time (min.) 

Barometric Pressure (in Hg ) 

Ambient Temp.( F ) 

Initial Flow Rate ( mL/min.) 

Final Flow Rate (mL/min.) 

Mean Flow Rate (mL/min.) 

Adsorption Tube l.D. 

• 

• 

Calculated Data 

Sample Volume ( L ) 

Corr. Sample Volume ( L ) 

Calculation Vstd 

Notes 

.*.. 

e.\3 

/•KAP 

/np 

Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Dup. 

Pb 

Ta 

/ 

2/t/T7 

Otoo 

/OoO 

(oO 

30.00 

t*% 

200 

2.GO 

LOO 

CQSSS8 

Q/VM 

/2.S-0 

13SC> 

CO 

36.60 

72 

200 

stoo 

DOO 

COmSSSY 

• ~ 

. %• 

A 

• •>..*'. ' 

. - • r •-•* 

•'-.,% • • 

•,.*•• : * 

Va 

Vstd 

/Q.OO 

/2.#3 ' 

. AD. 60 

//?Y / 

Va x Pb x 528R 

29.92 x (460 + Ta) 

5V C-8 
P.56 

R U M SUMMAR Y 

Runs 1 and 2 

Client Henderson,Black,& Greene. 

Source SMCHO" Z< MRVO 

Date Feb 4, 1397 

Project No. 116G5-002-001 

Analyst Roberts 

THC 

ppm 

THC 

ppm 

BIAS DATA 

Post-run bias at 9:06 

Zero 

Span 

Span Gas 

AVERAGE DATA 

Run 1 

Raw averages 

•*•**••-.' AQ A 

Corrected using post-run bias 

N/A N/A 

Run 2 

Raw averages 

JrnCttO _*nrvrig.V__ 

494^ 82.2^-

Corrected usin g post-ru n bias 

N/A N/A 

~~^V 7 ^ --^2.7 . v ^4^-Q

>1 = ZTV^ff^/^S M 

A )m1

' -q^M-v il l +- M^l = |2\?.' 

<-./ 

9S 

-^PffiQ C-9 
FIEL D 

Client Henderson,Black,& Greene 

Source SMCHO & MRVO 

Date Feb 4, 1997 

Date Feb 4, 1997 

Starting time 

Or,t^M 

0(Y\ £ V Is (rev 

O^ ^ ^ 

V<X\{L\f \% ^vs 

Qr»^^A O^ 

lav^-o ucTtn^- . c7vj\ 

<xsn — -WA1 

, 

Time 

(p.'57 

7.07? 

7:58 

7:59 

8:00 

8:01 

8:02 

8:03 

8:04 

8:05 

8:06 

8:07 

8:08 

8:09 

8:10 

8:11 

8:12 

3:13 

8:14 

8:15 

8:16 

8:17 

8:18 

8:19 

8:20 

8:21 

8:22 

8:23 

8:24 

8:25 

8:26 

8:27 

8:28 

8:29 

8:30 

8:31 

8:32 

O * O f 

O • w u 8:34 

8:35 

8:36 

8:37 

8:38 

8:39 

Run 1 

DAT A 

Projeci 

THC 

mv 

b No. 

Analyst 

ppm 

nrrii/ 

l-minut 

245 

244 

246 

248 

243 

254 

265 

276 

285 

362 

414 

405 

418 

424 

429 

429 

445 

512 

504 

500 

498 

503 

508 

511 

521 

549 

610 

701 

706 

688 

723 

999 

760 

576 

615 

615 

571 

519 

494 

501 

501 

394 

11665-002-001 

Roberts 

THC 

mv ppm 

3rn<L^O 

e data averaqinq period 

24

 / 

24 

24 

25 

24 

25 

26 

28 

29 

38 

44 

43 

44 

45 

45 

45 

47 

55 

54 

54 

54 

54 

55 

55 

56 

59 

66 

77 

77 

76 

79 

112 

84 

62 

67 

67 

62y 

56 

53 

54 

54 

41 

*"?*T,7 

277 

317 

348 

358 

360 

367 

387 

401 

387 

384 

381 

384 

377 

383 

384 

388 

391 

386 

334 

384 

388 

624 

944 

1033 

1112 

1233 

1509 

1616 

1675 

1885 

2950 

7277 

7857 

7856 

7856 

7856 

7858 

7859 

7860 

7857 

2.9 

*5 =•. 

4.1 

4.2 

4.4 

4.6 

4.6 

4.7 

4.9 

5.1 

4.9 

4.9/' 

4.9 

4.9 

4.8 

4.9 

4.9 

5.0 

5.0 

4.9 

4.9 

4.9 

4.9 

7.9 

12.0 

13.2 

14.2 

15.8 

19.2 

20.6 

21.4 

24.0 

37.6 

92.8' 

100 

100 

100 

100 

100 

100 

100 

100 

WisftinJ* 

H.-D 

• 

•__m.~ C-l ( nn. 

% MJL^U^M^ 

T' 
P.58 

FIEL D DAT A 

Run 1 

Client Henderson,Black,& Greene Project No. 11665-002-001 

Source SMCHO & MRVO Analyst Roberts 

Date Feb 4, 1997 

THC THC 

Time mv ppm mv ppm 

Run Averages: -?:S7 to 8+39-

481 52 2217 28.3 

*1 

•v^am c-
FIEL D DAT A 

Run 2 

P.59 

Clien t Henderson % Black,! 

Sourc e SMCHO & MRVO 

Dat e Feb 4 , 1997 

la reene Project No. 

Analyst 

11665-002-001 

Roberts 

Time 

7". HZ. 

THC 

mv ppm 

THC 

mv ppm 

Starting time S-H^7 1-minute data 

8 

8 

8 

8 

8 

8 

8 

8 

8 

8 

8 

8 

8 

8 

8 

8 

8 

9 

9 

9 

9 

9 

43 

44 

45 

46 

47 

48 

49 

50 

51 

54 

55 

56 

57 

58 

59 

00 

01 

02 

03 

04 

05 

=.,364 

5229 

4914 

4592 

4451" 

4679 

5032 

4899 

5693 

5747 

5811 

5542 

5124 

4773 

4434 

4328 

3967 

3310 

2808 

2423 

2345*/ 

1924 

1709 

616/3802 

600 3766 

564 

527 

511 

537 

577 

562 

654 

660 

668 

636 

588 

548 

509 

496 

454 

379 

320 

276 

267 

218 

194 

4263 

5403 

5738 

5762 

5598 

6007 

5994 

6216 

6199 

6441 

6690 

6778 

7022 

7857 

7858 

7358 

7358 

7859 

7793 

7570 

7854 

averaging 

48.5 

48.0 

54.4 

68.9 

73.2 

73.5 

71.4/ 

76.6 

76.4 

79.3 

79.1 

82.1 

S

er *} 

86.4 

89.6 

100 

100 

100 

100 

100 

99.4 

96.6 

100 

period 

SMCHO MTRV 

494 

Run Averages: 

4309 

to 9T©5-

6443 82.2 

Pros 

C-12 

S?! 
P.60 

CALIBRATIO N DRIF T DAT A 

Number 1 

Starting Time 9:06 

Client Henderson,Black,& Greene Project No. 11665-002-001 

Source SMCHO S< MRVO Analyst Roberts 

Date Feb 4, 1997 

Analyzer THC THC 

Method 25A • 25A 

Span Conc. tOOO ppm 100 ppm 

RESULTS 

Zero mv 62 82 

Conc. 3 ppm 1.0 ppm 

Cal. Zero 0 ppm 0.0 ppm 

Span mv 3844 3451 

Conc. 440 ppm 44.0 ppm 

Span Gas 449 ppm 44.2 ppm 

CALIBRATION DRIFT 

Zero Drift 0.3// 1.0*// 

Since Cal 1 Cal 1 

at _ 17:08 17:08 

Span Drift -0.9"// -0.27/ 

Since Cal 1 Cal 1 

at 17:08 17:08 

^ 
P.61 

CALIBRATIO M DAT A 

Number 1 

Starting Time 17:08 

Client Henderson,Black,S< Greene 

Source SMCHO & MRVO 

Date Feb 3, 1937 

Project No. 11665-002-001 

Analyst Roberts 

Analyzer 

Method 

Span Conc 

THC THC 

25A 25A 

1000 ppm 100 ppm 

Zero 

Result, mv 35 

Span tti 

Conc. 259 ppm 25. 3 ppm 

Cyl . ID C£AO«\fr\<A e/Lvoo-VH 

Result , mv 2249 2010 

Span tt2 

Conc. 454 ppm 43.5 ppm 

Cyl. ID <HU\*.0*U ces'vrss 

Result, mv 3922 3463 

. Span #3 

Conc. 933 ppm 92. 6 ppm 

Cyl . ID Ctjcflul^ (LC-»UT2>\ 

Result , mv 8107 7260 

Calibration Curve Coefficients 

Slope 8.652^ 78.39/ 

Intercept 35.0^ 1.0/ 

Corr Coeff N/A N/A 

Recalculated Concentrations and Calibration Error 

Error Uses Value Value 

Zero 

Span #1 

Span #2 

Span #3 

ppm '/.err ppm '/.err 

N/A N/A 

25$ -1.2 ' 25.6 1.2 ' 

449 -1.1 ' 44.2 1.6 ' 

N/A N/A 

C - H 

6& 
P.62 

HARDWARE IMFORMATIOM 

Client Henderson,Black ,S< Greene 

"Source SMCHO S< MRVO 

Date Feb 3, r.**97 -

Project No. 11665-002-001 

Analyst Roberts 

Analog input device: ACjr Analog Card CStrawberry Tree) 

ANALYZERS 

Channel 2: 

Method 

Analyzer Make S< Model 

Full Scale Output, mv 

Span Concentration, ppm 

Channel 3: 

Method 

Analyzer Make & Model 

Full Scale Output, mv 

Span Concentration, ppm 

- THC 

25A 

Teco51 

10000 

1000 

THC 

25A 

TecoSl 

10000 

100 

C-15 

<H 
P.63 

R U M SUMMAR Y 

Runs 1 and 2 

Client Henderson,Black,S< Greene 

Source SMCHO S< MRVO 

Date Feb 4, 1397 

Project No. 11665-002-001 

Analyst Roberts 

THC 

ppm 

THC 

ppm 

BIAS DATA 

Post-run bias at 11:30 

Zero - -

Span — -

Span Gas - -

/••-—Cv •= 

AVERAGE DATA 

Run 1 

Raw averages 

25 Iy 54 y 

Corrected using post-run bias 

N/A N/A 

Run 2 

Raw averages 

445 ' 93 

Corrected using post-run bias 

N/A N/A 

UL\L\ 

e>2+ 

C-16 
RUM SUMMARY 

Run 3 

Client' Henderson,Black,& Greene Project No. 11665-002-001 

Source SMCHO ?< MRVO Analyst Roberts 

Date Feb 4, 1997 

THC THC 

ppm ppm 

BIAS DATA 

Pre-run bias at 11:30 

Zero - -

Span - -

Span Gas - -

Post-run bias at 15:30 

Zero - -

Span - -

Span Gas - -

AVERAGE DATA 

Raw averages 

444 ^ 75 

Corrected using average of pre-run and post-run bias 

N/A N/A 

C-17 

— w$§m-± 
FIEL D DAT A 

Run 1 

P.65 

Client Henderson,Black,?< Greene 

Source SMCHO 2< MRVO 

Date Feb 4, 1997 

Project No. 

Analyst 

11665-002-001 

Roberts 

Starting 

Time 

V-T* SMC 

8:30 

9:31 

9:32 

9:33 

9:34 

9:35 

9:36 

9:37 

9:38 

9:39 

9:40 

9:41 

9:42 

9:43 

9:44 

9:45 

9:46 

9:47 

9:48 

9:49 

9:50 

9:51 

9:52 

9:53 

9:54 

9:55 

9:56 

9:57 

9:58 

9:59 

10 :00 

10:01 

10:02 

10:03 

10:04 

10:05 

10:06 

10:07 

10:08 

10:09 

10:10 

10:11 

10: 12 

10: 13 

10: 14 

THC 

mv 

;H0 

ppm 

MTRV, 

1-minute dai 

3271 

3432 

O O O "7* 

2703 

2146 

1746 

1460 

1254 

1162 

1078 

1003 

924 

865 

811 

769 

728 

690 

658 

£30 

606 

579 

560 

540 

523 

511 

510 

505 

508 

504 

499 

554 

577 

539 

513 

497 

493 

524 

805 

927 

1067 

1641 

2638 

3344 

3670 

4097 

374 

368 

308 

244 

198 

165 

141 

130 

120 

112 

103 

9 6' 

90 

85 

80 

76 

72 

69 

66 

63 

61 

58 

57 

55 

55 

54 

55 

54 

54 

60 

63 

58 

55 

5 3 ' 

53 

57 

89 

103 

119 

186 

301 

383 

420 

470 

THC 

mv ppm 

> 

;a averaqing peri 

531 

560 

547 

537 

526 

512 

464 

445 

457 

472 

454 

440 

423 

416 

406 

397 

389 

JU-J 

378 

366 

*J%J **** 

351 

347 

341 

342 

395 

425 

451 

417 

403 

415 

398 

399 

409 

407 

422 

441 

449 

445 

445 

463 

488 

505 

530 

537 

61 

65 

63 

62 

60 

59 

52 

50 

51 

53 

51 

49 

48 

46 

45 

44 

43 

42 

41 

40 

39 

38 

37 

37 

37 

43 

47 

51 

4 6 ' 

45 

46 

44 

44 

45 

45 

47 

49 

50 

50 

50 

52 

55 

57 

61 

62 

od 

C-18 

yjiforMNl 
IEL D DAT A 

Run 1 

Client Henderson,Black,S< Greene 

Source SMCHO & MRVO 

Date Feb 4., 1997 

Project No. 11665-002-001 

Analyst Roberts 

<T.Z<\ 

1 

10: 

10: 

10: 

10: 

10: 

10: 

10: 

10: 

IOIO 

10 

10 

10 

10 

UX 

'ime 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

.23 

24 

.25 

:26 

:27 

:28 

*-seTHC 

mv 

4224 

4429 

5442 

6371 

6945 

5655 

4592 

4289 

4156 

3935 

3806 

4576 

5192 

6273 

6352 

ppm 

484 

508 

625 

732 

799 

650 y 

527

 / 

492 

476 

451 

436 

525 

596 

721 

730 

THC 

mv 

566 

549 

536 

532 

538 

551 

536 

564 

603 

586 

590 

595 

634 

660 

688 

ppm 

65 

63 

61 

61 

62 

63 

61 

65 

70 

68 

68 

69 

74 

77 

81 •s 

Run Averages: 9:29 t o 10:29 

2209 251 474 54 

toS 

C-19 
01 

•rt0> 

ct* 

**-•• 

3 

l£l 

3 

ID 

O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O UJ UJ "X" UJ UJ UJ UJ u[" UJ ,UJ UJ UJ kD UJ uj UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ U!i uJ tD uJ iD U!i UJ iD UJ kD 

•- •- ,_* |1 _ ^ o o o o o o o o o o Ln cn cn cn cn tn cn cn cn cn ji ji ji ji ji ji ji Ji Ji * to to OJ OJ to to co to to to ro 

cn ji to ro i- o UJ CO vi tn cn Ji to ro •- o u> co si tn cn Ji to ro *- o UJ OJ vi cn Ln ji to ro •-* o UJ OO sj cn Ln ji OJ ro ^o*i ) 

on Ln ji ro ro ro to to to ji ji ji Ji to to to ro ro ro ro ro ro ro OJ ji Ln tn cn cn cn cn tn cn oi Ln tn tn tn tn tn Ln Ln cn cn to o >- ID cn UJ i- to tn ro Ln -vi ro to •**•• •-* u> sj ji ro ro ji oo ji Ln -si ji •--• ro ro tn ro or ro vi o ro H M to co to * ^ 

uj u[i cn oo to Ln ID cn ••* o •- i- si •-*• co ji •-* cn OJ H* ro cn ro sj o Ln to oo ro sj sj Ln •-* •*-*• o tn tn tn ro ji oo •-* cn LH to co * o co cn to Ln Ln •- cn si u» cn u[i Ln to to ro ji o -*-• cn ro •-* tn Ji UJ O ro cn to s4 to to oo on to si to oo oi **•* sj 

tn*vivivjvjvicntntntn 

ui o ro o o ro s^ro m cnoooojiUjsioon*-* 

•si Ln ji to to to to to ji ji Ln Ln *• to to to to to ro ro ro ro to to Ln tn si vi Ln cn cn sj vj Ln 

co co sj ji o to cn oo -- oo •- ji U J sj cn cn O J *- oo cn cn si io UJ *- tn ji K* U J O cn» - ji U J 

cn cn cn o •- C D cn cn ji ro co — o U J cn o co ji to ro co U J ro si cn •-• o »- U J cn ro U J U J O O 

N 

sjsg^cnvivicncno^cncncnijicnijitncncncnijicncncn-sjvivimooajoovisj 

sj co f i£i o •-* m j i cn cn j i cn si sj vj OJ cn si oo u:' si vj UJ ro ro oo o ro j i •-* si j i j i Ln oi ro -D ro woi ro to j i tn 

ro to to ro jn-o m o tn Ln Ln LH cn co to o •-* vi j i Ln co ro ro ro Ln co ro UJ Ln •-» UJ tn Ji to cn j i u> j i •-*• oo »-* cn j i 

U['CDCDOOODOOOOs4v|-J*v|vJv|s4vjajv|vimoOsJCDCOCOOO"J)'aiUJOu:'UjOOOOmCO m 

ro vi ji i-* to ji o tn oi vi L H vi u ) U J u:< o vj I D •— ro U J o *— en Ln to on O D ro vj ro U J oo I D U J cn ro en Ln U J cn tn oo o 

\ 

cn 

i " % 

Ji 

o 

cn UI' 

Oh | 

• - 3 

| - k frnt. 

to 3 

c •rtsj ro 

o j i to a . 

0i 

ctvj cn o« tf**-! 

Ji 

sl 

UJ Oi 

< ID 

S 

00 00 Oi 

CO CXQ 

•*-•• 

3 

tfl 

Tl 

ID 

-*[ 

3 

ID 

3 

< 

TJ 

TJ 

3 

I 

O 

3 

< 

TJ 

TJ 

3 

X 

O 

o 

a 

ato n Oi 

etro 

o •-

c *•-• 

-i ID 

n 3 

ID rt-

•n.tn i 

tn CT 

3 ID 

O 3 

I a Ji O ID 

»-* 

H I 

ui 

-_ fi* ut 

0 

3 3 

-n •. 

•vl < CO 

O •*--

0i 

n 77 

3 

(D 

"0 

-< 

o 

c. 

J> ID 

3 n 

0l rt" 

•-• 

**< Z 

10 o 

rt- -

3J *-

o »••* 

cr tn 

ID tn 

-< cn rt- 1 

in o 

o ro i 

o 

o 

70 

c 

3 

ro 

1 

H 

r 

0 

0 

D 

H 

1> 

TJ 

Ui 
FIELD DATA 

Run 2 

Client Henderson.%Black,& Greene Project No. 11665-002-001 

Source SMCHO & MRVO Analyst Roberts 

Date Feb 4, 1997 

THC THC 

Time mv ppm mv ppm 

10: 16 

10:17 

10: 18 

10:19 

10:20 

10:21 

10:22 

10:23 

10:24 

10:25 

10:26 

10:27 

10:28 

IOi 29 

10:30 

10:31 

10:32 

10:33 

10:34 

10:35 

10:36 

10:37 

10": 38 

10:39 

10:40 

10:41 

10:42 

10:43 

10:44 

10:45 

10:46 

10:47 

10:48 

10:49 

10:50 

10:51 

10:52 

10:53 

10:54 

10:55 

10:56 

10:57 

10:58 

10:59 

11 :00 

11:01 

11 :02 

6887 

6992 

7128 

7309 

7817 

8631 

8598 

8624 

8603 

7838 

6819 

6111 

5417-

4389 

3569 

2969 

2568 

mi_^_. 1 \_j 

2057 

1905 

1858 

1930 

1780 

1713 

1682 

1676 

1631 

1598 

1575 

1490 

1399 

1625 

1907 

2016 

2507 

3021 

3156 

3159 

6535 

6463 

5491 

5556 

5739 

5242 

4325 

3267 

2570 

792 

804 

820 

841 

899 

994 

990 

993 

990 

902 

784 

702 

622 

503 

408 

339 

293 

259 

234 

216' 

211 

219 

202 

194 

190 

190 

184 

181 

178 

168 

158 

184 

216 

229 

286 

345 

361 

361 

751 

743 

. 631 

638 

659 

602 

496 

374 

293 

921 

938 

909 

891 

907 

987 

967 

988 

1004 

1007 

984 

955 

998 

982 

977 

989 

990 

1001 

992 

980 

944 

922 

990 

1035 

1062 

1049 

1054 

1068 

1024 

1078 

1084 

1127 

1184 

1134 

1204 

1310 

1147 

1067 

995 

940 

953 

884 

838 

797 

709 

675 

U l 

113 

109 

107 

109 

119 

117 

119 

121 

122 

119 

115 

120 

119 

118 

119 

119 

121 

120 

118 

113 

112 

111 

119 

125 

129 

127 

128 

129 

124 

131 

132'' 

137 

144 

138 

147 

160 

140 

129 

120 

113 

115 

106 

100 

95 

84 

79 C-21 

kn -\aspKo-
P.69 

FIEL. D DAT A 

Run 2 

Clien t Henderson,Black ,?< 

Sourc e SMCHO ~& MRVO 

Date Feb 4 , 1997 

Greene Project No. 11665-002-001 

Analyst Roberts 

Time 

THC 

mv ppm 

THC 

mv ppm 

03 

04 

05 -

06 

07 

08 

09 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

.-,^ 

••iO 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

29 

30 

2151 

1879 

1706 

1568 

1453 

1346 

1265 

1257 

1281 

1495 

1935 

2294 

2460 

2551 

2622 

2747 

3660 

4489 

4105 

3471 

2836 

2401 

2107 

1919 

1785 

1649 

1517 

1383 

245 

213 

193 

177 

164 

152 

142 

141 

144 

169 

220 

261 

280 

291 

299 

419 

515 

470 ' 

397 

324 

273 

240 

218 

202 

187 

171 

156 

706 

691 

661 

647 

650 

635 

606 

576 

579 

566 

561 

539 

544 

544 

515 

513 

510 

512 

528 

534 

523 

521 

513 

503 

495 

491 

479 

469 

33 

81 

77 

76 

76 

74 

70 

67 

67 

65 

65 

62 

62 

62 

59 

58 

58 

58 

60 

61 

60 

60 

59 

57 

56/ 

56 

54 

53 

Run Averages: 9:29 to 11:30 

3885 445 787 93 

6% 

C-22 
to 

rtOi 

-t 

rt* 

**-•• 

3 

lO 

3 

ID 

to to to ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro r-o ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro 

BS •• •• •• SI SB SS •• SB •• • • •• SS •• •• • • Bl •• •• •• tt SB BB • • BB tB •• BS • • • • BB BB • • BB BB BS BB SB SB BS S S SS SS SS SB BB S W 

ji ji ji ji ji ji ji to to OJ to to to OJ to to to ro ro ro ro ro r0 ro ro to(j*-KHKHh*h'*-*-*- o o o o o o o p o o 

oi cn ji to to i-* P UJ oo sj cn cn ji to ro •- o UJ OO si OI Ln ji to ro >- o UJ OO si tn Ln ji to ro •** o u> oo sj cn on ji to ro •- o ji ji on cn cn si si >j cn tn cn vi cn oi vi co oo sj Ln Ln Ln ji ji ji to OJ OJ ro »-

to UJ Ln •** on ro * p ji to oo ro si to to ro oi ji ID si OJ vi UI *+ cn ji ro u) u> tn Ji to OJ to OJ to to to OJ OJ to OJ * ji 

oo p *- ji vi vi ro P ro ro UJ ro •- P OO »•** UJ Ln Ji to ji ro to cn UJ ro tn»-» tn •-» p si on Ln Ln oi tn tn si si oo UJ P •* tn H* oo ro oo ji Ln ro UJ Ln ro sj oi UJ ro oo Ln to ro UJ oo tn tn to ro sj UJ ji si tn tn tn ji cn cn ji tn m ji UJ ro p ro p 

Ln Ln u^ si vi oo oo oo -vi vi vi oo tn vi oo u> UJ oo cn cn on Ln Ln ji Ji to to to ro 

o oi to o tn to ui o OJ ro UJ to Ln ro Ji ji oo Ln oo Ln •- A ro si ro UJ SI OJ ro oi Ji to to to co to OJ to OJ ji ji ji ji ji to ro Ji oi oo si ji cn ID si to *-• si Ln ID cn uj ^ co UJ Ji ro o vi to ro to to ro si to UJ oo sj vi oo oo oo UJ O O •- t-o OJ 

oi cn cn -sj sj sj sg vj cn cn Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln ji ji Ji * ji ji Ln tfl ji ji ji ji ji ji Ji ji ji Ji * to to to to to to to OJ ro 

•-* to u> cn ji p co ro co ro u:i tn ji Ln cn OJ oo Ln sj CD Ln cn o o -^ Ln Ji oo sj ji i- •- i-* p •-* UJ vi oo oo vi oo to p UJ 

cn ro •-* •- ro vi oi cn ro oo vi cn UJ oi Ln tfl oo ji oo tn OJ ro P P OO to si Ln si ji UJ ro Ln sj OJ or ro to oo u> ji Ln tn to 

vivioouL'OomajoaaDvicncncncncnc^cncncncncncncncncncncncflCflcnjijijiJiJ^JiJiJiJiJiJiOjojoj 

ro j i •- o to OJ si oi o OJ ic- j i to j i cn ^ cn ^ Ji tfl H* ro sa sj vi i- o cn j i p si tn on cn cn j i •-*• ro to »- ro tn ro »-» 

j i Ji 

M 0J 

i- tn 

i 3 *•• 

3 

C 

rtID 

Ji Ji 

Ji on a 

o» 

rtro OJ 0i 

U> P 

Oi 0J Qi 

< 

ID 

-< 

0J 0J Oi 

-*-* ro«i 

• * -

3 

<a 

TJ 

at 

-< 

*H»-

o 

a. 

3 

ID 

3 

< 

TJ 

TJ 

3 

o 

3 

< 

TJ 

TJ 

3 

X 

O 

DOl O 

0i 0 -— 

rt-C •-• 

ID 1 ID 

n 3 

ID rt-

-nui i 

ID 3 m 

cr o 3 i a j i a ID 

• -_ 

S° lA 

H* IJ 

UJ2C 3 

U) 73 -

s j < at 

O H~-

0i 

f l 

TT ne. TJ 

• ^ 

0 

3> ID 

3 n 

0l rt-

_-. **< 2 

einf • o 

7i »-

0 *-* 

cr ffi 

ID cn 

-< tn 

rt- I 

in o 

p ro 

i 

7i 

c 

3 

0J 

H 

Pl 

r 

0 

G 

]> 

H 

T> 

2 
5* 

to to to to to to to to to to to OJ to to to to to to to OJ to to to to to to to to to to to to to to ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro 

to to to to ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro •*• •- *- *- •- •-• *- •-* *~ »- P P P P P P P O P o cn cn tn Ln cn 01 LH Ln Ln tfl ji ji Ji to ro i- o UJ m si 01 cn ji to ro •-*• o «:• oo si cn tn ji co ro -- p u> co si m ui ji OJ ro --•• p ID co si ro ui ji co ro •-••• P UJ m -J 

ro to to to ji ji tn ji ji to to to ji ji tn 01 sj m m m m m ro ro ro ro Ln Ln ji OJ <- •-* »-* »^ H* --» *-» i-* i-* i- i- ro ro to to to to 

ro <-* ji si •- ji *- iX' UJ ro tn si i- tn to Jv sj cn cn tn on tn tn cn tn ro UJ tn oo to m tn ro •- ro to *- or sj vj UJ ro on -- ro * u> i- ji ji UJ UJ to OJ ro to UJ ro UJ to sj u> to Ji to to to to to m si to ji p to «D ro oo m P UJ ro ji ji si m tn Ji p tn ji Ji UJ •>•* 

rj cn cn ji ro co vi o i- to o m ji sj i- ji o o o P -^ *- ro tn to to Ln UJ *- ro m Ln to on oo •-* to Ln tn ro ro ro -vi *- Ln UJ Ln 

to to to ji ji tn Ln cn cn ji ji ji ji cn tn v| m ID U3 UJ ID U> UJ ID UJ ID tn ro cn to ro ^ •- --•-•-•-*• *-* ro »-* ro ro to to to ji Ji 

ro tn UJ to ro p UJ tn tn ji o to si ro *-*• Ji UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ OO ro UJ Ji si to tn oo •— -si to OJ Ji Ln tn UJ o UJ ro ui o ui --JO* MyjjvjiMujouuia ) to tn ji Ln u> o •-* to to ji to to on -vj ji us ID tn »-» ro ji ui Ln ji ro ••*•• OJ P ro ro •-*• »-* OJ UJ »-» P UJ 

v 

»-» I"-*- l-» IK* 

cncncncncnffiffivivivioicncncncncncncnoicnonviviooroujPO'-* --^ujujujujujcosisjvisisivivivicnffitjT 

ro to cn ro si UJ UJ to to o UJ oo UJ si to to to cn oi cn cn cn cn -- cn to to UJ vi iD vi Ln Ji j i o j i ro •** LO j i OJ Ji Ln to ro si sj P vi ro ui" j i Ln ui""-' to cn Ln cn to vi i- cn vi --* ro to si to oo j i to P P ro tn p o to tn P •-» -si UJ ro vi tn ro ffi to tn cn ro ro 

3 

ID 

3 

< 

sjvlOnffivlQDQDCDQDmCDCOCOffiOiCncncn 

ro ji ji 00 UJ ro to tn Ln to ro *-*• *- vj -- to ro Ln 

sj vj sg UL" uJ U) P •****• tO OJ Ji Ji *~ 

m sj vi P -- si ro ro Ln ro OJ cn si 

i-»r-»i-«.pp(DrooororocorocDODsjvi 

LnJitOCOi-OiJislOOsjroaislt-'UJUJ 

n i 

KJ 

4= 

TJ 

TJ 

3 

I O 

3 

< 

TJ 

TJ 3 

X 

O 

a cn o 

Oi 

rtID 

O 

c 

-•{ 

n ID 

•n ro 

ID 

CT 

3 

O 

»-• 

M -

ID 

3 

rtI 

ID 

3 

x a. 

Ji o 

•# 

*-* 

fi» 

ID 

T 

tn 

0 

UJ 3 3 

UJ 73 *« 

sl < CD 

O -—• 

0< 

UJ 

-*» 

ID 

ID 

3 

fD 

T) 

-% 0 

c. 

3> ID 

3 n 

Ol rtI-* 

"< Z 

tn o rt- • 

70 «-* 

0 >-* 

CT cn 

ID tn 

-•; tn 

rt- 1 in P 

p 

ro i 

TJ 

c 

3 

OJ 

H 

r 

0 

0 

D 

H 

i> 

fsl 
Ji Ji ji Ji ji ji 4i Ji Ji Ji Ji Ji Ji Ji Ji Ji Ji Ji Ji Ji Ji to to OJ to OJ OJ OJ to OJ to to OJ to to to to to to to to to to to to OJ to 

t,-, H* •-• i-* •-• i-^ --• i- •- •-» i- p p p p p p p p p p (jr cn cn cn cn cn cn cn cn cn ji ji ji ji Ji Ji ji ji ji Ji to to to to to OJ 

P UJ ro si cn cn ji to ro •*•* P UJ ro si ro cn ji to ro •-* P UJ ro vi ro ui ji to ro »••* P UJ ro vi cn cn ji to ro •*•*• P UJ ro vi ro cn ji 

ro co ro m ro ro ro ro cn ji OJ ro •- *- •--. -- •- »-•-»•-•-•-•-*•-•-»----•-»-- ro ro ro 

ro ro ro OJ OJ tn ro «-* to u:> u:' p •- UJ si sj sj sg sg sg sj © ro ro ro u> P p UJ u:i P ^ ^ to ji ro s4 m UJ ro ji ji ro UJ ro ro tn 

to to to P ji to •*-• ro to ji to si ji to si •- ro Ln ro vi ro p to tn u> ji OJ ji to -vi co p UJ p ui ro ji tn •-* ro P ro tn ^ ro sj p 

p p ji ro <A' p tn •- u3 •-* Ln P p UJ Ln »^ ro P P p si Ln ji sj to sj ro ro to ro ro UJ UJ UJ m ro K- oo * i- ro ro ro to P ro to 

u> ID UJ uj UJ UJ <D UJ ro m Ji to i-** •-» »-'H»t-**K*i-*»-»i-'i-*i-*i-»*r*»-» ro ro ro •-»•*»»-» ro ro OJ ro -jjuj*iiLnroroujoj--roLnojroprosirororomromujujujP"-i-ppi-roojjiromuj--*-PLflro m 

to to j i ro ^ ro ro uj OJ vi •- ui m j i ui m o to Ji ui si UJ ro ui UJ ro ro si j i UJ ro j i j i si on to sj -- -vt ro m si si vi vi m cn 

ro tn ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln j i j i Ln Ln Ln Ji j i Ji Ln j i Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln cn LQ Ln ui cn Ln LO ro ro to Ln ro to tn ro vi sj cn ui j i Ln •- to j i j i co Ln Ln to ro Ln j i ro co ro •-••--•• UJ to UJ P u> p P •-•• ro ro to ro ro to tn si oo p ro 

ro cn si p c j i ro si p ro P si oo ro ro -si ro si Ln *-• * j i to UJ UJ ro si Ln to UJ ro si UJ I-* j i UJ ui ro ui u» ro UJ oo ro Ln j i to 

sjvivivisgrosjsjsgsgvjcnLnrorororororororororojijiroLnLnLnjiLnLnLnLnLnLnrororororororororovivi 

to si ro j i ro P uii u> si vi cn j i UJ •*•* ro to ro Ji Ji •-* tn j i ro ro UJ P UJ UJ ro UJ si ro vj vi vi gj o p •— •— p ro Ln vj oo o to 

\ 

3 

ID 

3 

< 

I O 

TJ 

TJ 

3 

3 

< H I O TJ 

TJ 

3 

oro <# Hi o 

rt-C 

ID t 

n ID 

•nro 

ID 3 

CTO 

I 

§ - • 

MID 

3 

rtI 

ID 

3 

a J i O ID 

•*• T 

«• in 

•-» o i D 3 3 

UJ73 

s j < 

o 

*** 

00 

i-" 

0> 

Tl 

TC 

•* ft0 

CJ 

-s 

ID 

ID 

3 

ID 

TJ 

-% 

O 

<___. 

3> ID 

3 n Oi rt-

•-» 

**< z 

m o rt- • 

73 "-* 

O •-* 

cr ro 

ID ro 

-< tn 

rt- | 

in p 

p 

ro 

p 

p 

73 

c 3 

OJ 

1 

H 

m 

r 

o 

o 

H 

r-o 
"s/ 

cncncncncncncncnjijijijijijijijijijijijijijijijijijijijijijijijijijijijijijijijijijijijijijiji 

P P P p P p P p cn cn cn cn cn cn cn cn cn cn Ji ji Ji ji ji ji Ji ji ji ji to to to to to to OJ to to OJ ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro 

sj tn cn ji to ro •**• P UJ OO si ro Ln ji to ro •- p UJ ro si ro on ji to ro •- p UJ ro vi ro cn Ji OJ ro f p u> oo vj cn on ji to ro •-*• 

ji ro si ro tn Ln ji ji ji to ro i- •- f ^ ro ro to ji Ln Ln ji ji Ln si ji to to ji to to to OJ * Ln ro cn to to to OJ to ji tn si oo ro 

ro si UJ Ln ro to si ji i- vi UJ UJ ro ro oo ro ro ro ro »-»ro oo m si p tn Ln si p cn ji ro sj ro to ro si ro ji to ro ro OJ Ji P tn ro 

to Ln Ln sj vi OJ P vi Ln sj UJ ro ro Ln oo -^ to ro si to to ro tn LI ro Ln P UJ ro •-* ro ji ro •-• UJ OO »-* ro oo ji •- UJ OO ro si to to 

si p P ji ji OJ sj ro si on ro P Ln P •- ji u:i si i- sj i- ro m i^i Ji ro "- u> Ji sj u:i i-* Ln to ro ro Ln ro ro ro ji ji sj vi ji to p 

Ln sj UJ si ro ro Ln Ln ji ji OJ ro »- •*-- to ro to to Ji cn ro Ln cn ro m cn ji ji 

OJ si •- cn si -- ji i- vi to Ji i-- ro m i-» cn P vi UJ UJ P ro cn ro •** ro p OJ 

ro ro cn ro cn oo P to ro ro ro ro * vi to ro •-* ro P P P •-» ro ro ro to •*- cn 

gijitojijijicnvirojiOJOJjijitflrocou)u: i 

ro p UJ »-*- to ro t-o ro cn ro UJ ro *-* j * o to •-* ro UJ 

oo ro u> vj i- to P to vi ro UJ ro j i ro to ro j i ro to 

j i cn cn cn cn cn cn cn cn cn cn cn cn cn cn cn cn ro si co oo P •* p P P P P UJ UJ UJ UJ P UJ UJ P UJ UJ ro ro vi ro ro ro ro ro ro 

cn p «^ to cn ro ro ro Ji j i ro ro j i p ro *-*• cn cn ro ro UJ oi o o u) tn M •- M u * -J o o> ic o * o * H ro ro to to OJ P •-

j i Ln Ln P Ln UJ to UJ si OO •-* Ln ID *-*• to si p r- ro j i u> to UJ ro cn ro >-> o c- to co Ln j i ro Ln ro UJ co P ro on UJ ro P Ji ro p 

Ln Ln Ln ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro Ln ro Ln ro sj oo UJ P ro co ro to ro to ro -—I--.-~-.I--> ro •--> ro ro»-opu>aivivjviviviv i *- si uj i- j i ro tn ro to to si oo to si p UJ OJ ro tn ro oo si on i-* to 'UJ P ro si ui w si»-» vi P ro j i ro P sj ro to j i to j i p •-* 

3 

ID 

3 

< 

I O 

TJ 

TJ 

3 

3 

< 

TJ 

TJ 

3 

X 

O 

o 

i 

KJ 

o m o Oi 

rtID 

o 

c -I 

n 

ID 

*•"• 

*r«-

ID 

3 

rt-

-n ro i 

ID 3 

cr o X 

ID 

3 

a Ji O ID 

>• 

•— UJ 

UJ 

.JO 

3 

73 

vi <: 

O 

-*; in 

o 3 

•« 00 lack,S

< Greene •u 

-% 0 

C i . 

3> ID 

3 n 

0i rt-

»-• *< Z 

in o rt- • 

73 »-* 

O •-

CT ro 

ID ro -i Ul 

vi- 1 

in P p 

NJ 

1 

C" 

p 

TJ 

C 

3 

to 

1 

H 

r 

o 

d 

H 

co 
-4 

TJ 

C 

3 3> 

< ID -\ Oi <n ID 

to in oo •• sl jUJ i ji ji 

M *• 

P 

P cicn o to Uj *— Ul ro sl UJ tn 

o 

i Kl 

-sl 

Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln cn ui tn Ln 

ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro IOHI-PI-HHHI-HIO P 

UJ oo vi ro Ln ji to to •- P ID ro vi ro Ln ji to ro *•* P UJ ro 

ro ro ji ji ji ji ji ji ji ji ji OJ ro ro ro ro ro ro to OJ to to 

P cn vi ji si ji co tn Ln ro ro sj tfl en ro ro ro UJ to p ro sj 

UJ oo ro ••* oo si cn ro ro ui ro o u\ ro •-* I-* to ui •-* ro to on 

Ln Ln UJ ji ro ro ji to u:i ro on s, yj oo t-o UJ ro ro cn si si vi 

sj si Ln Ln Ln Ln ji Ln Ln Ln ji Ji ro ro ro to to OJ to OJ OJ Ji 

P ro ji P ji i- UJ ro •- OJ UJ ro UJ UJ UJ ro p to si ji si OJ 

P UJ to ro UJ to UJ to UJ Ji »•* Ji ro OJ ro ro p ro UJ ro p p 

*v 

sj vi vi vi vi vi ro ro ro ro ro cn Ln j i LH ui Ln Ln Ln Ji j i Ji 

oo ro ro P •-» i- UJ ro ro j i to ai ro ro * P ro to ro ro ro tn 

ro -vi p uii ro ro si Ln j i *- UJ oo si ID Ln u> ro ui •- j i to si 

iDUjui'OooooomsivivivioiroLnffiuirororoLnLnLn to j i P Ji j i j i ro oo oo Ln Ln UJ UI to to ro p »- p Ln ui »

-

3 ID 

DOll , Oi o *-

rt-C •*• ID t ID n 3 ID rt3 

< TJ TJ 

3 

X O 

3 

< TJ TJ 

3 

X 

O 

3 

a 

^IUJ x 

ID 3 ID 

CTO 

I 

JiO ID 

•• •*•**; «° ul "— o 

UJ3 3 

UJ73* 

v j< 00 O •*-

tu 

l~l 77 

U." -< ID ID 

3 ID Tl 

t 

O 

<~. 

J> ID 3 n 0i rt- i— 

**< z in o rt- • TJ - 0 • - cr ro ID ro 

-_ Ln <+ 1 in p 

p ro i 

p 

p 

TJ 

C 

3 OJ 

H in 

r ci 

o ]> 

H 

B 
P.75 

CAI _ I BRA T I O M DRIF T DAT A 

Number 1 

Starting Time 11:30 

Client Henderson,Black,S< Greene Project No. 11665-002-001 

Source SMCHO & MRVO Analyst Roberts 

Date Feb 4, 1997 

Analyzer THC THC 

Method 25A 25A 

Span Conc. 1-000 ppm 1000 ppm 

RESULTS 

Zero mv 20 66 

Conc. -2 ppm 1 ppm 

Cal. Zero 0 ppm 0 ppm 

Span mv 3886 3495 

Conc. 445 ppm 440 ppm 

Span Gas 449 ppm 446 ppm 

CALIBRATION DRIFT 

Zero Drift -0.27.y 0.V// 

Since Cal 1 Cal 1 

at _ 9:09 9:09 

Span Drift -0.47. -0.67.

 / 

Since Cal 1 Cal 1 

at 9:09 9:09 

C-28 

Tf 
P.76 

CALIBRATION DRIFT DATA 

Number 2 

Starting Time 15:30 

Client Henderson,Black,& Greene 

Source SMCHO S< MRVO 

Date Feb 4, 1997 

Project No. 11665-002-001 

Analyst Roberts 

Analyzer THC THC 

Method 25A 25A 

Span Conc. 4000 ppm 1000 ppm 

RESULTS 

Zero mv 

Conc. 

Cal. Zero 

Span mv 

Conc. 

Span Gas 

-?*"7-

-1 ppm 

0 ppm 

4000 

458 ppm 

449 ppm 

73 

2 ppm 

0 ppm 

3581 

450 ppm 

446 ppm 

CALIBRATION DRIFT 

Zero Drift 

Since 

at 

-0.1*// 

Cal 1 

9:09 

0.27. ' 

Cal 1 

9:09 

Span Drift 0.97.' 0.47. ' 

Since Cal 1 Cal 1 

at 9:09 9:09 

IS 

C-29 

-MpffiQ-
P.77 

CALIBRATIO M DAT A 

Number 1 

Starting Time 9:09 

Client Henderson,Black,S< Greene - Project No. 11665-002-001 

Source SMCHO & MRVO Analyst Roberts 

Date Feb 4, 1997 

Analyzer THC THC 

Method 25A 25A 

Span Cbnc. 1000 ppm 1000 ppm 

Zero 

Resu 11, mv 35 55 

Span #1 

Conc. 259 ppm 259 ppm 

Cyl. I D ccio-m-4 ce.\o«\cqq 

Result, mv 2249 2062 

Span #2 

Conc. 454 ppm 454 ppm 

Cyl . ID CJUl2.oju> teuton * 

Result , mv 3922 3548 

Span #3 

Conc. 933 ppm 933 ppm 

Cyl. ID CCVO^U"!*^ CC_10*^6.7«? 

Result, mv 8107 7358 

Calibration Curve Coefficients 

Slope 8.652' 7.827y 

Intercept 35.Q' 55.0-^ 

Corr Coeff N/A N/A 

Recalculated Concentrations and Calibration Error 

Error Uses Value Value 

ppm '/.err ppm '/.err 

Zero N/A N/A 

Span #1 256 -1.2/ 256 -1.2^ 

Span #2 449 -1.1 ' 446 -1.8' 

Span #3 N/A N/A 

C-30 

ICo 
P.78 

HARDWARE INFORMATION 

Client Henderson,Black,2< Greene 

Source SMCHO ?< MRVO 

Date Feb 4, 1997 

Project No. 11665-002-001 

Analyst Roberts 

Analog input device: ACjr Analog Card (Strawberry Tree) 

ANALYZERS 

Channel 2: 

Method 

Analyzer Make 8< Model 

Full Scale Output, mv 

Span Concentration, ppm 

Channel 3: 

Method 

Analyzer Make 8< Model 

Full Scale Output, mv 

Span Concentration, ppm 

- THC 

25A 

Teco51 

10000 

1000 

THC 

25A 

Teco51 

10000 

1000 

C-31 

77 —\sspnfl-
rcun i 

Clien t Henderson , Blac k -it Greene Projec t No. i i 665-002-0 0 i 

Sourc e Styren e Conversio n Analyst Roberts 

Date Feb 20 , i997 

THC 

Time mv ppm 

Startin g time i3:i2 ; i-minut e data averaging period 

zer o ai r 

i 3 : i 3 -i 6 0. 0 

i 3 : i 4 -i 6 0. 0 

Styren e Conversi 

• •••.•I t .•'!.• • .•**.•• 1 

i W i >^V -^ i *- ^.^.a i 

i 3 : 2 i 2i 2 22. i 

1 3 : 22 2i 2 22. i 

£iiE^n -i^—t M ^ MAk-( 

Run Averages: i3:i2 to ij:24 

i35 i4.7 

9^»vo. a.*i f*op&>ne. ~ <3-S>-.) 

o p m A.S <LcLt\>ct\ ~ <PS«\ >^>3— L_olff,2> 

o.ma ^ ^- ^ n-c J tec boo> -ret^o*=<e. 4odror 

^

 tf y 

T.«vj 

o 

,',•"•* /"-J"— "Z-T-. . 

• 4*2-^ ^ ^

 f

oti* ^f~^f , 

 i r")(~~f Pf~ (*r 

C-32 

"7C> WHUJ " 
P.80 

CHLIBRHTIO N DAT A 

Number i 

Starting Time 12:52 

Client Henderson, Black it Greene Project No. i i 655-002-00 i 

Source Styrene Conversion Analyst Roberts 

Date Feb 20, iS37 

Analyzer THC 

nethod 25A 

Span Conc. iOO ppm 

*.ero 

Kesuit, mv -ib 

Span #i 

Conc. 259 ppm 

L«yi • i u c c iOli'-j'-T'-f 

Resuit, mv 2654 

Span #2 

Conc. 454 ppm 

Cyl. ID ccii2056 

Result, mv 4726 

span -ffj 

L>onc. *3ta»%js ppm 

Cyl . ID cci0967 9 

Result , mv 363 i 

Calibratio n i_urve coefficient s 

Slope i0.3 4 

Intercept -i6. 0 

Corr Coeff N/A 

Recalculate d Concentration s and Calibratio n trro r 

Error use s value 

ppm '/.err 

Zero M/H 

Span -Si 235 -0.3 

Span 7.2 459 i.O 

Span #3 M/H 

">1 

C-33 
P.81 

HARDWARE xMrDRMATxOM 

Clien t Henderson, Black i** Greene Project No. i iSS5-002-00i 

Source Styrene Conversion Analyst Roberts 

Date Feb 20, i997 

Analog input aevice : HCjr Hnaiog caro ». atr a wo erry iree ; 

HNHL.Tl.fcKa 

unannei i: mc 

riethod 25A 

Analyzer Hake i_ riodei TECO 5 i 

Ful i Scaie Output, mv iOOOO 

Span Concentration, ppm iOO 

C-34 

Y Wi «jTA» mMM STI 

%Q wwKWi" 

P.83 

APPENDIX D 

FIELD DATA -

MIXING ROOM VENT 

KM 1665\MZ\001\REPORT.DOC 7 Much 1997 8:00 AM Version 

%~L~ 
THC as Styrene Emissions 

P.84 

Combined Cooling Vent 

Process Input, lb prepared polymer/hr 

Process Input, Ib styFene/hr 

Ave. Emission Rate, lb/hr as styrene* 

Ave. Emission Rate, lb styrene/lb prepared polymer input' 

Ave. Emissiori Rate, lb styrene/lb styrene input1 

0.10 

Vent 

I'r-te'- 1 Mii uriir; *- V.tf •,-*;i-i 

„t.i j___l,i_i "<*i •• :j*^V**.';-,.i •• v *.. -. ••*!'*,

 ,',TM,

*(i,]'*T."i'H'*T*. 

Spinning Machine 'If^in^Roiiin1' '"^f;y ^ 

r

 ,!-.-*>,.;':. . •?••• . .•:•:*«*,•! :s«v**.i'*>v 

:

**1SS73^'': : ; 

*;^;^,;.n-*;;***,»S:t::. 

ffi**i^r«~ii'*%,v 

- „,STbtal.'". 

£'. ^%*i-'«:*, 

:r. "v«08i85 

•.-po6a2v 

:

-*'*i,*S.r:*:"^ii.;'^ 

•:.:^69*"' 

3.73E-02 

"Time weighted average. 

K:\1 1665UXH\001\MRV02.XLS r> 

D-1 

Primad on: 3/7/97 3:47 AM 
P.85 

THC EMISSION CALCULATIONS 

Client: 

Location: 

Weston W.O. No.: 

Source Code: 

1 

2/4/97 

0657 

1130 

1.51 E+04 

0.015 

HB&G 

Troy, AL 

11665-002-001 

Mixing Room Vent 

2 

2/4/97 

1200 

1530 

1.47E+04 

0.022 

Average 

1.49E+04 

0.012 

0.142 0.142 0.142 

Run Number 

Date 

Time Began 

Time Ended 

Volumetric Flow Rate, dscfm*'b 

Moisture (Bws) 

Response Factor, (Styrene/Carbon) 

Total Hydrocarbon 

Concentration, ppm wet as propane 

Concentration, ppm dry as propane 

Molecular Weight of C, ug/ug-mole 

Concentration, ppm dry as Cc 

Emission Rate, lb/hr as Cc 

Styrene 

Molecular Weight of styrene, ug/ug-mole 

Concentration, ppm dry as styrenec-d 

Emission Rate, lb/hr as styrene0 

' Run 1 VFR from average of Runs 1 and 2 of velocity traverse data. 

b

 Run 2 VFR from Run 3 of velocity traverse data. 

'Time weighted average. 

d

 Styrene concentration calculated using the measured THC response factor of lppm C=0.142 ppm styrene. 

70.3 

71.4 

12.01 

214.1 

6.034 

104.14 

30.40 

7.430 

75.0 

76.7 

12.01 

230.1 

6.315 

104.14 

32.67 

7.776 

72.7 

74.0 

12.01 

221.1 

6.157 

104.14 

31.39 

7.581 

K:\ll 665\O02\OO1 \MRV02. XLS ?*? Printed on: Hni&l 3: 30 AM 
P.86 

EMISSION CALCULATIONS 

Run Number 

Date 

Time Began 

Time Ended 

Styrene 

Molecular Weight, jig/ng-mole 

Corrected Sample Volume, L 

Mass of Sample, |ig 

Concentration, ppm 

Toluene 

Molecular Weight, |ig/ng-mole 

Corrected Sample Volume, L 

Mass of Sample, ng 

Concentration, ppm 

. Xylenes 

Molecular Weight, ng/jig-mole 

Corrected Sample Volume, L 

Mass of Sample, ng 

Concentration, ppm 

Client: 

Location: 

Weston W.O. No.: 

Source: 

1 

2/4/97 

0846 

0946 

104.14 

12.03 

1300 

24.9 

92.10 

12.03 

34.0 

0.7 

106.20 

12.03 

16.0 

0.301 

HB&G 

Troy, AL 

11665-002-001 

Mbcing Room Vent 

2 

2/4/97 

1250 

1350 

104.14 

12.06 

960 

18.4 

92.10 

12.06 

71.0 

1.5 

106.20 

12.06 

13.0 

0.244 

Sample volume equivalent of styrene, % 96 91 

K--.1166S\0O2\0Ol\MRVO2.XLS 

tt 

D-3 

Printed on: 3/7/97 3:34 AM 
P.87 

VELOCITY TRAVERSE DA'A 

CUENT H(*^r^> 

SOURCE t&*rj*2>**iEJ frtngt/ 

PITOT TUBE ID NO. PbH 

STACK DIAM. (to) 

WORK ORDER HO. WIPLPS-OOZ-OON 

^.7 5 STACK AREA ((rt 

PTTOT TUBE COEFHCEfr ».r± THERMO/LO) P NOS, J&2L&L 

SKETCH 

NOTES 

P * B 

M* o.44<%co,) • oaocftop 

. O2800W*/, * %CO> 

i4 tf-*w 

<?. ' 

U«n»t 

l, *• Awi m Mn 

T, • -Vwnfi *M 

P, - Stack taoe 

P.-

Mi 

M, 

AbwriaMtti 

- Motac****!*** 

*• Motacaiar 

<?4 ' • % 

<?«U 

Kkpfa 

wvifhl 

««i|lM 

V, • Ami****-*****: tact |M 

A, - AI M of -mdt. f* 

QA 

Q. 

of ******* T 

• off**, "ft 

•.•H P 

««.-H | 

e«Mdi|M:4tr 

^l- -

v-tiOCMy* tl^ M 

• VoiWQMtnC flOV fVtt^ SCtnBHI 

• VonsMn flow fttB* dKl^HB 

Bw, - W-Mt v-^or in |M 

Page of 

l.l-4«**W>A*M WJIIWAM1IWI TiUka MH 

jr - 1349C, /CT«f ^ -A j 

w D-H 
MOISTURE IN STACK GAS BY WET BULB - DRY BULB MEASUREMENT 

PLANT l^fo^ o 

STACK rvrr-gA/ 

OPERATOR TuttLOCATION Tro-^A L 

RUN I . Z , S DATE Zr^-^.1 

Barometric Pressure (Hg) 

Static Pressure (in HjO) 

Absolute Pressure of Stack 

13.6 

Wet Bulb Temperature (°F) 

Dry Bulb Temperature (T) 

Temp Difference (Td-Tw) 

Vapor Pressure of H2O at Tw 

Partial Pressure of H,0 • PP 

PP = ( VP) -

(P, - KP) (At) 

2800 - (1.3) <JJ 

PP = ( ) ( )( ) 

2800 - (U) (T.) 

Moisture by volume = M 

M {PP 

C. 

(100) (100) * 

Page of 

Pw 

P 

P. 

Tw 

T„ 

AT 

VP 

-inHg 

3r7>.PO JnHg 

Q.\0 

zil l 

u\ 

TO 

-Q.O*?|"«g.toinH,0 

S'TH 2^1inHg 

6 V 

72 

/ 

• SHP7 

^ 

7 0 inHg 

7 $ «p 

d-flga? 

(PO^ 

£ ° F 

y 

6.137* mHg 

/ 

.-4M33 

ur/: 

. 537*.. ^/ 

0-8*93 CQ>£^8 

I .071? 

y 

O.Ct(o({ 

o.oyy^ •°',,7t 

IBR 

tXlENEKAOAElMNPOftl*XAft-*.rftM * W 

WKMWiCIXfcjH 

* 1 D-5 
P.89 

PRELIMINARY VELOCITY DATA 

•TMEN T Ufe . o-r o 

SOURCE ^ i ,1 I, ^n n ••• •• ^^

 W l A Hei^^f rwing- DATE^.^-*/-? ? 

DUCT DATA <*"*»» " ^ " 

WORK ORDER NO. 1/ G>(g^-oo1-oo l 

Dial, from fw wtK 

lo oatiMt of pott 

Nlpp k knfth 

Dtp * of Doct 

WiMiof-ioctdoc) 

Ana of duct 

31>.1S 

_ _ 

1-S.7S 

rn.**M 

te, 

kk 

Eipi-rikai -fitmcitr 

3 JI deplti i wM-J* 

depth • wWd** 

at T t 

Due noo ncwsi 

tfktarbinc* io peru 

"A" T 

( ) • ( II 2gL 

SKETCH OF STACK MEASUREMENTS 

t 

n ^^ 

t 

.^=-

pnxZ 

4. v/erTT 

• of 

3.E 

ML 

n.q 

^Z-3 

67-7 

9-Q.LP 

S7.S 

I I 

9Lo.% 

/.ofr --?> 

3-5H z ^ 

C>-SS •- » 

l&JD . 

Z2..E5 •• » 

•rf*MM 

27-2D >-5> 

30-Z1 -5> 

Mi£ l 

CIRCULAR DUCTS 

ita*. 

•ft****** 

•ti n 

RECTANGULAR DUCTS 

X 

•u 

I U 

•OJ 

l»J 

T.l 

I M 

I I I 

t o ns 

<u 

I U 

IIJ 

«M 

MJ 

•IJ 

n i 

• 

• 

• 

• 

u 

•u 

« J 

m i 

«IJ 

na 

•u 

t*u 

• 

-

. 

M 

IM 

UO 

IM 

IM 

<M 

IM 

no 

«M 

• 

. 

4J 

IM 

I U 

I U 

IM 

HJ 

«u 

n j 

MJ 

ft* 

. 

•u 

tu 

Ml 

I U 

IIJ 

*u 

Ml 

•BJ 

n* 

m 

ma 

nt 

I4J 

• U 

Cl 

Tl» 

M J 

14J 

I M 

T M 

• M 

t M 

Jl IL 

M 

I M 

I M 

IT.? 

b 

u 

u 

IM 

u» 

HI 

«u 

TM 

111 

t u 

f M 

• 

• 

U 

<u 

I U 

IT.T 

a* 

IM 

MJ 

TU 

B J 

MJ 

tu 

m 

s«. 

of 

l:**C W** n** AL'AOMMTO* M * All .AI.FM4 lark** IWR &r D-6 
P.90 

'.•^^•mTm^" ""'Jf.''-.' Vi?'- " * * / 

SAMPLE FLOW FIELD DATA 

Client HB*Gi 

Location /V/>/^ TAVK fitf* \Jc<_l 

W.O.# 

Source Code 

Test Personnel -J vv / u R 

Date 

Time Began 

Time End 

Sample Time (min.) 

Barometric Pressure (in Hg ) 

Ambient Temp.( F ) 

Initial Flow Rate ( mL/min.) 

Final Flow Rate (mL/min.) 

Mean Row Rate (mL/min.) 

Adsorption Tube l.D. 

• 

Calculated Data 

Sample Volume ( L ) 

Corr. Sample Volume ( L ) 

Calculation Vstd 

Notes 

Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 

Pb 

Ta 

ft\2> 

"«f\ /, , 

2/y/7 7 

6Wb 

0?</fe 

0>O 

30.00 

C?2 

aoo 

zoo 

sao 

shhi 

I2SO 

0 5i> 

CO 

30.06 

72 

SOO 

QO</ 

30Q. 

c-fisaa't K* ^77 

- • 

i :\\\9 

• \ 

Dup. 

• • " . . » -• * 

- ••''••.£* . 

-.. ,•' 

;<»p. 3 CG155S4 ctk ft/7S 

r

 CQSV7-V 

Va 

Vstd 

/2.0O 

/a.oi' 

/D./Q / 

' /3.c(t y 

Va x Pb x 528R 

29.92 x (460 + Ta) 

^ 

D-7 

P.92 

APPENDIX E 

LABORATORY DATA 

KAI 1665V002\001\R£FORT.OOC 7 Mmfa 1997 8:00 AM Version 

% 
P.93 

Inter-Office Memorandum 

MANAGERS "V^^ X DESIGNERS •CONSULTANTS 

Auburn Operations 

FROM: Brian Benson 

TO: Greg Sims 

* * DATE: 11 February 1997 

cc: file 

PROJECT: Henderson, Black & Green W.O. NO.: 11665-002-001 

SUBJECT: NIOSH 1501 Sample Analysis Results 

ACTION: Analysis of Samples Received on 05 February 1997. 

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: 

This letter with attachments constitutes our report ofthe air samples submitted to the laboratory for 

aromatic hydrocarbons analysis. The samples were received in good condition and in accordance 

with the chain-of-custody. The analysis was performed following NIOSH Reference Method 1501. 

The charcoal tube samples were prepared by separating the front and back portions of each charcoal 

tube into a five milliliter vial and desorbing each with four milliliters of carbon disulfide. The 

samples were allowed to desorb over night in a freezer. A one milliliter aliquot from each sample 

was then placed into a two milliliter autosampler vial and analyzed using gas chromatography (GC) 

with a Flame Ionization Detector (FID). The impinger samples were prepared by first measuring 

the methylene chloride fraction by pouring the entire contents into a fifty milliliter graduated 

cylinder and recording the methylene chloride volume. A one milliliter aliquot from each sample 

was then placed into a two milliliter autosampler vial and analyzed by GC widi a FID. 

QUALITY ASSURANCE AND QUALITY CONTROL: 

Quality control procedures conformed to the reference method and our laboratory quality assurance 

plan. Calibration Curve Verification(CCV) Standards were analyzed before and after the analytical 

sequence and were within the Percent Difference Acceptance Criterion of ± 15 percent. 

Replicate analyses was performed on one sample. The Percent Difference Acceptance Criterion is ± 

10 percent. All ofthe target compounds detected had percentage differences less than one percent. 

Substantiating data is on file and available upon request. 

rr 

K '.CHEM LABV'WORDVCHEM LABXGC LTRS\HBG2_7 DOC VE-1 
P.94 

Client 

WESTON W.O. # 

Date Received 

Analyst 

Detection Limit (ng/mL) 

Henderson, Block & Green 

11665-002-001 

5 February 1997 

B. Benson 

1.5 

Auburn Air Quality & Industrial Hygiene Laboratory 

Analysis Report 

for Aromatic Hydrocarbons by NIOSH 1501. 

Source ID 

Vol. 

(mL) Sample ID Styrene Oig/rnL) 

Styrene 

(Hg/Section) 

Styrene 

(|ig/Sample) 

SMCHO RUN 1 

SMCHO RUN 2 

MTRV RUN 1 

MTRV RUN 2 

FIELD BLANK 

10 

4 

4 

12 

4 

4 

6 

4 

4 

8 

4 

'4 

14 

4 

4 

CQ5558.I 

CQ5558 F 

CQ5558 B 

CQ5554 I 

CQ5554 F 

CQ5554 B 

CQ5556 I 

CQ5556 F 

CQ5556 B 

CQ5477 I 

CQ5477 F 

CQ5477 B 

CQ5557 I 

CQ5557 F 

CQ5557 B 

15.5 

2561.8 

0.0 

19.3 

1932.4 

15.0 

16.0 

310.8 

0.0 

6.5 

226.1 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

154.7 

10247.3 

<1.0 

232.1 

7729.8 

59.9 

95.7 

1243.3 

<1.0 

51.7 

904.3 

<1.0 

<21 

<1.0 

<1.0 

10000 

8000 

1300 

960 

<21 

k:.chem lab\i-cWoc\air\HBG2_7.XLS Air Report PaBe I on<cl3 

E-2 

Printed on: 2/11/97 
P.95 

Client 

WESTON W.O. # 

Date Received 

Analyst 

Detection Limit (jig/mL) 

Auburn Air Quality & Industrial Hygiene Laboratory 

Analysis Report 

for Aromatic Hydrocaibons by NIOSH I SO I. 

Henderson, Block & Gre 

11665-002-001 

5 February 1997 

B. Benson 

1.5 

Source ID 

VoL 

(mL) 

SamplelD Toluene 

(ug/mL) 

Toluene 

(Hg/Section) 

Toluene 

(Hg/Sample) 

SMCHO RUN 1 

SMCHO RUN 2 

MTRV RUN 1 

MTRV RUN 2 

FIELD BLANK 

10 

4 

4 

12 

4 

4 

6 

4 

4 

8 

4 

4 

14 

4 

4 

CQ5558 I 

CQ5558 F 

CQ5558 B 

CQ5554 I 

CQ5554 F 

CQ5554 B 

CQ5556 I 

CQ5556 F 

CQ5556 B 

CQ5477 I 

CQ5477 F 

CQ5477 B 

CQ5557 I 

CQ5557 F 

CQ5557 B 

0.0 

14.0 

0.0 

0.0 

10.4 

0.0 

0.0 

8.6 

0.0 

0.0 

17.8 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

<15 

56.2 

<1.0 

<18 

41.8 

<1.0 

<9 

34.3 

<1.0 

<12 

71.2 

<1.0 

<1.0 

<1.0 

<1.0 

56 

42 

34 

71 

<1.0 

k:\chein JabNgc\voc\airiHBG2_7.XLS Air Repon Page 2 of 10 

E-3 

Printed on: 2/11/97 
P.96 

Aubum Air Quality & Industrial Hygiene Laboratory 

Analysis Report 

for Aromatic Hydrocaibons by NIOSH ISOl. 

Client 

WESTON W.O. # 

Date Received 

Analyst 

Detection Limit (ng/mL) 

,~

 Vo1

-

Source ID .. . 

•:. (mL) 

SMCHO RUNl 10 

•1 

•I 

•1 

X 

SMCHO RUN 2 12 

MTRV RUN 1 

MTRV RUN 2 

FIELD BLANK 

4 

4 

6 

4 

4 

8 

4 

4 

4 

4 

4 

Henderson, Block & Gre 

11665-002-001 

5 February 1997 

B. Benson 

1.5 

SamplelD 

CQ5558 I 

CQ5558 F 

CQ5558 B 

CQ5554 I 

CQ5554 F 

CQ5554 B 

CQ5556 I 

CQ5556 F 

CQ5556 B 

CQ5477 I 

CQ5477 F 

CQ5477 B 

CQ5557 I 

CQ5557 F 

- CQ5557B 

Ethylbenzene 

(Ug/mL) 

0.0 

13.1 

0.0 

0.0 

8.0 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

Ethylbenzene 

(Hg/Section) 

<15 

52.4 

<1.0 

<18 

32.1 

<1.0 

<9 

<1.0 

<1.0 

<12 

<1.0 

<1.0 

<21 

<1.0 

<1.0 

Ethylbenzene 

(fig/Sample) 

52 

32 

<9 

<12 

<21 

k: chein_laW|jc\voc'air\HBG2_7.XLS Air Repon Page 3 of 10 

K 

E-4 

Printed on: 2/11/97 
P.97 

Auburn Air Quality & Industrial Hygiene Laboratory 

Analysis Report 

for Aromatic Hydrocaibons by NIOSH ISOl. 

Client 

WESTON W.O. # 

Date Received 

Analyst 

Detection Limit (ng/mL) 

Vol. 

Source ID , . . 

(mL) 

SMCHO RUN 1 I 

- . 

SMCHO RUN 2 1 

MTRV RUN 1 

MTRV RUN 2 

FIELD BLANK 

0 

4 

4 

2 

4 

4 

6 

4 

4 

8 

4 

4 

14 

4 

4 

Henderson, Block & Gre 

11665-002-001 

5 February 1997 

B. Benson 

1.5 

Sample ID 

CQ5558 I 

CQ5558 F 

CQ5558 B 

CQ5554 I 

CQ5554 F 

CQ5554 B 

.* CQ55561 

CQ5556 F 

CQ5556 B 

CQ5477 I 

CQ5477 F 

CQ5477 B 

CQ5557 1 

CQ5557 F 

CQ5557 B 

Xylenes 

(}ig/mL) 

0.0 

38.8 

0.0 

0.0 

28.7 

0.0 

0.0 

4.0 

0.0 

0.0 

3.2 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

Xylenes 

(Hg/Section) 

<15 

155.3 

<1.0 

<18 

114.9 

<1.0 

<9 

15.8 

<1.0 

<12 

12.8 

<1.0 

<21 

<1.0 

<1.0 

Xylenes 

(Hg/Sample) 

160 

110 

16 

13 

<21 

k:,cliernJab\gcwoc\air\HBG2_7.XLS Air Repon Page 4 of 10 

E-5 

Printed on: 2/11/97 
P.98 

Auburn Air Quality & Industrial Hygiene Laboratory 

Analysis Report 

for Aromatic Hydrocarbons by NIOSH I SO I. 

Client 

WESTON W.O. # 

Date Received 

Analyst 

Detection Limit (jig/mL) 

Vol.. Source ID .. . 

(mL) 

SMCHO RUN 1 10 

4 

4 

SMCHO RUN 2 1 

MTRV RUN 1 

MTRV RUN 2 

FIELD BLANK 

2 

4 

4 

6 

4 

4 

8 

4 

4 

14 

4 

4 

Henderson, Block & Gre 

11665-002-001 

5 February 1997 

B. Benson 

1.5 

Sample ID 

CQ5558 I 

CQ5558 F 

CQ5558 B 

CQ55541 

CQ5554 F 

CQ5554 B 

CQ5556 1 

CQ5556 F 

CQ5556 B 

CQ5477 I 

CQ5477 F 

CQ5477 B 

CQ5557 I 

CQ5557 F 

CQ5557 B 

Cumene 

(Ug/mL) 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

Cumene 

(|ig/Section) 

<15 

<1.0 

<1.0 

<18 

<1.0 

<1.0 

<9 

<1.0 

<1.0 

<12 

<1.0 

<1.0 

<21 

<1.0 

<1.0 

Cumene 

(ug/Sample) 

<15 

<18 

<9 

<12 

<21 

k:'.cliem_labvgcwoc\air\HBG2_7.XLS Air Repon Page 5 of 10 

91 

E-6 

Printed on: 2/1U97 
P.99 

Auburn Air Quality &. Industrial Hygiene Laboratory 

Analysis Report 

for Aromatic Hydrocarbons by NIOSH ISOl. 

Client 

WESTON W.O. # 

Date Received 

Analyst 

Detection Limit (ng/mL) 

Vol. 

Source ID *; , . 

(mL) 

SMCHO RUN 1 10 

4 

4 

SMCHO RUN 2 1 

MTRV RUN 1 

MTRV RUN 2 

FIELD BLANK 

2 

4 

4 

6 

4 

4 

8 

4 

4 

14 

4 

4 

Henderson, Block & Gre 

11665-002-001 

5 February 1997 

B. Benson 

1.5 

SamplelD 

CQ5558 1 

CQ5558 F 

CQ5558 B 

CQ5554 I 

CQ5554F 

CQ5554 B 

CQ5556 I 

CQ5556F 

CQ5556 B 

CQ5477 I 

CQ5477 F 

CQ5477 B 

CQ5557 I 

CQ5557 F 

CQ5557 B 

Benzene 

(Ug/mL) 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

Benzene 

(jig/Section) 

<15 

<I.O 

<1.0 

<18 

<1.0 

<1.0 

<9 

<1.0 

<1.0 

<12 

<1.0 

<1.0 

<21 

<1.0 

<1.0 

Benzene 

(Hg/Sample) 

<15 

<18 

<9 

<12 

<21 

k: chein_lab\|!cwoc\air\HBG2_7.XLS Air Repon Page 6 of 10 

E-7 

Primed on: 2/11/°7 
P.100 

Auburn Air Quality & Industrial Hygiene Laboratory 

Analysis Report 

for Aromatic Hydrocarbons by NIOSH ISOl. 

Client 

WESTON W.O. # 

Date Received 

Analyst 

Detection Limit (ng/mL) 

Vol 

SourceI D

 fnr^ 

\ut 

SMCHO RUN 1 10 

" 

SMCHO RUN 2 1 

MTRV RUN 1 

MTRV RUN 2 

FIELD BLANK 

4 

4 

2 

4 

4 

6 

4 

4 

8 

4 

4 

14 

4 

4 

Henderson, Block & Gre 

11665-002-001 

5 February 1997 

B. Benson 

1.5 

Sample ID 

CQ5558 I 

CQ5558F 

CQ5558 B 

CQ5554 I 

CQ5554 F 

CQ5554 B 

CQ5556 I 

CQ5556 F 

CQ5556 B 

CQ5477 I 

CQ5477 F 

CQ5477 B 

CQ5557 I 

CQ5557 F 

CQ5557B 

a-methyl 

Styrene 

(Ug/mL) 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

a-methyl 

Styrene 

(Hg/Section) 

<15 

<1.0 

<1.0 

<18 

<1.0 

<1.0 

<9 

<1.0 

<1.0 

<12 

<1.0 

<1.0 

<21 

<1.0 

< 1.0 

a-methyl 

Styrene 

(Hg/Sample) 

<15 

<18 

<9 

<12 

<21 

k: chemJab\gcwoc\air\HBG2_7.XLS Air Repon Page 7 of 10 

?9 

E-8 

Printed on: 2/11/97 
p.1 

Aubum Air Quality 4 Industrial Hygiene Laboratory 

Analysis Report 

for Aromatic Hydrocarbons by NIOSH 1301. 

Client 

WESTON W.O. # 

Date Received 

Analyst 

Detection Limit (|ig/mL) 

Vol. 

Source ID , , . 

(mL) 

SMCHO RUN 1 1 

SMCHO RUN 2 

MTRV RUN 1 

MTRV RUN 2 

FIELD BLANK 

0 

4 

4 

2 

4 

4 

6 

4 

4 

S 

4 

4 

14 

4 

4 

Henderson, Block & Gre 

11665-002-001 

5 February 1997 

B. Benson 

1.5 

Sample ID 

CQ5558 1 

CQ5558 F 

CQ5558 B 

CQ5554 I 

CQ5554 F 

CQ5554 B 

CQ5556 I 

CQ5556 F 

CQ5556 B 

CQ5477 I 

CQ5477 F 

CQ5477 B 

CQ5557 I 

CQ5557 F 

CQ5557 B 

butyl-Toluene 

:(Hg/mL) 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

butyl-Toluene 

(ug/Section) 

<15 

<1.0 

<1.0 

<18 

<L0 

<1.0 

<9 

<1.0 

<1.0 

<12 

<1.0 

<1.0 

<21 

<1.0 

<1.0 

butyl-Toluene 

(fig/Sample) 

<15 

<18 

<9 

<12 

<21 

k:*.chemJab\|,c'.voc\air'iHBG2_7.XLS Air Repon Page 8 of 10 

(00 

E-9 

Printed on: 2/11/07 
P.2 

Auburn Air Quality & Industrial Hygiene Laboratoiy 

Analysis Report 

for Aromatic Hydrocarbons by NIOSH 1501. 

Client 

WESTON W.O. # 

Date Received 

Analyst 

Detection Limit (fig/mL) 

Henderson, Block & Gre 

11665-002-001 

5 February 1997 

B. Benson 

1.5 

*-*v-- ..•vol:*' 

Source ID •-••/•,*, 

(mL) 

Sample ID 

SMCHO RUN 1 10 CQ5558I 

• 

SMCHO RUN 2 1 

MTRV RUN 1 

MTRV RUN 2 

FIELD BLANK 

\ CQ5558 F 

4 CQ5558 B 

2 CQ55541 

4 CQ5554 F 

4 CQ5554 B 

6 J CQ55561 

4 CQ5556 F 

4 CQ5556 B 

8 CQ54771 

4 CQ5477 F 

4 CQ5477 B 

14 - CQ5557I 

4 CQ5557 F 

4 CQ5557 B 

vinyl-Toluene 

(Ug/mL) 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

vinyl-Toluene 

(ug/Section) 

<15 

<1.0 

<1.0 

<18 

<1.0 

<1.0 

<9 

<1.0 

<1.0 

<12 

<1.0 

<1.0 

<21 

<1.0 

<1.0 

vinyl-Toluene 

(Ug/Sample) 

<15 

<18 

<9 

<12 

<21 

k:*«hemJab\uc\vocvair\HBG2_7.XLS Air Repon Page 9 of 10 

/oi 

E-10 

Printed on: 2/11/97 
P.3 

Aubum Air Qualiry & Industrial Hygiene Laboraiory 

Analysis Report 

for Aromatic Hydrocaitwns by NIOSH 1301. 

Client 

WESTON W.O. # 

Date Received 

Analyst 

Detection Limit (|ig/mL) 

Henderson, Block & Gre 

11665-002-001 

5 February 1997 

B. Benson 

1.5 

Vol. 

Source ID , , -, 

(mL) 

Sample ID 

SMCHO RUN 1 10 CQ55581 

SMCHO RUN 2 1 

• 

MTRV RUN 1 

MTRV RUN 2 

FIELD BLANK 

X CQ5558 F 

4 CQ5558 B* 

2 CQ55541 

4 CQ5554 F 

4 CQ5554 B 

6 CQ55561 

4 CQ5556 F 

4 CQ5556 B 

8 CQ54771 

4 CQ5477 F 

4 CQ5477 B 

14 CQ55571 

4 CQ5557 F 

4 CQ5557 B 

Naphthalene 

(jig/mL) 

' 0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

Naphthalene 

(ug/Section) 

<15 

<1.0 

<1.0 

<18 

<1.0 

<1.0 

<9 

<1.0 

<1.0 

<12 

<1.0 

<1.0 

<2I 

<1.0 

<1.0 

Naphthalene 

((ig/Sample) 

<15 

<18 

<9 

<12 

<21 

k:\chemJab\i-c\vocuir\HBG2_7.XLS Air Report Page 10 of 10 

E-ll 

Printed on: 2/11/97 
Custody Transfer Record / Lab Service Request PagcJLoft 

Client: Hcvderson^Bhck ctn*/ firee* i 

Work Order No.: //^S- CX)^-CVI 

ANALYSES 

REQUESTED 

Desired TAT: Q Meekis Resu,ts Du e By

: 

Project Manager: (S^ <r> 

Submitted By: ^. ^ ^ Phone #: S73 0 

Waka U M 0»ly 

LAB ID 

U) 

Client ID/ Sample Desertion 

HAiG/'StfcHo/R-/ /np/'nyf 

£& 5552' UB^ I'st^cn-oIfR-\ /5/ ck. Me 

Cd 5551 MB^/Sr^C^o/^-l Z^ (Sk. Me 

CGr^?- DX UzO BAJC 

//8+&/z*)Ctlo/ fi-0 

• V

 cc> S55</ Hfi+G/f^ctOl R-Z f^ck.hk< 

CQ ^551 /-/A^/^mCU-o/ ft-3 ?**lck. Mc 

act. 5556» ^ 6 /nrtl/ /t-l /s-t-cL Me 

ANALYTICAL 

METIIOD 

Matrix 

DJ H»0 

Dlt/tO 

Due 

Collected 

£>-y-?7 

0 -I 

i 

V J 

X £ 

/ft^6 /HTRl// R-l ryuaACt 'Zl 

r,Q 577/ m^lm^/R-l Zr./CLM< 

JVCCJIL HP^K 

ufo&/MTi\/ / *~o /^y r 

#3*6/wr/A-Q U+oA.Mt 

DI/AO 

P\eC/i 

N-Ht.0 

Ufob Ityr/tyf iz-a o^ ck,/^e\ " ^ i 

LL 

LL 

LL 

LL 

X. 

LL 

^3 

\0 

w 

LL 

¥ 

J 

& 

£ 

X 

2L I L 

TOTAL LISTED ON THIS COC 

RBCHVBP BT-; DATB/TMB 

ffikf'- • /coiomoM •Y 

UkJ 

fif 

;r 

rn 

ucsrvBD-tv DATC/IIMS fl/CONDITION 

• " • f. nin A 

wnrroN 

UMOafe 

UMHAS 

-MM>«MHULMJ I 

likMXMT'4 

acwnr 

«HAL$ 

4m - : 

XOSA 

mttlti I *i\ n 

Y*«rH 

COC 

Y«*r 

-Nam 

SAMTUID 

ON SACK 
§M«f7®« smmimysyysissmyy.Msyssmsmsmsmsmi 

-:s::-s.-->A:as«s.VA.Ss"s:s**s;.:ss:.s,;V :s,^s^sViS;;s»-s«s:?ig;^Ss 

104-
P.6 

APPENDIX F 

QUALITY CONTROL DATA 

KAI I665\002VOOI\REPORT.DOC 7 March 1997 8:00 AM Venion 
NATIONAL SPECIALTY CASES 

630 UNITED DRIVE 

DURHAM, NC 

27713 

(919)544-3772 

CERTIFICATE OFANALYSIS * EPA PROTOCOL MIXTURES 

REFERENCE H: 

EXP. DATE: 

88-48443 

7/18/99 .J 

CYLINDER #: 

LAST ANALYSIS DATE: 

|CC 100914 

7/18/96 

CYL. PRESSURE: 

CUSTOMER: 

2000 PSIO P.O. 0: 

SOUTHEAST AIRGAS• 

27181 

METHOD: 

I993G-I THIS STANDARD SHOULD NOT BE USED WHEN ITS GAS PRESSURE IS BELOW I.O MEGAPASCALS (ISO PSIG). 

ANALYZED ACCORDING TO EPA TRACEABILITY PROTOCOL FOR ASSAY AND CERTIFICATION OF GASEOUS CALIBRATION STANDARDS-SEPTEMBER 

COMPONENT: 

STANDARD 

SRMS: 

CYL. #: 

CONC: 

INSTRUMENT: 

MODEL*: 

SERIAL #. 

LAST CAL.: 

MEAN CONC: 

REPLICATE CONC. 

PROPANE 

I668B ', 

CLM 6439 : 

95.5 PPM 

ROSEMOUNT THC 

400A 

2000335 

7/6/96 

25.3 PPM +/-

DATE: 7/18/96 

25.3 

25.2 

25.3 

PPM 

PPM 

PPM 

i 

0.20 PPM 

l 

• 

.,. 

1 

, 

BALANCE GAS: AIR 

| REPLICATE DATA 

Tl 

I 

REPLICATE DATA 

DATE: 7/18/96 

Z 0 

| REPLICATE DATA 

R 

Z 

DATE 

Z 

R 

Z 

86.7 

0 

R 

Z 

c 

R 

Z 

C 

86.7 

0 

23.0 

c 

c 

R 

C 

C 

R 

23.0 

22.9 

86.8 

ANALYST: rsz. <&^rtnc,t<iTIUS RETORT STATED ACCURATELY THE RESULTS Of THE INVESTIGATION 

CONNECTION WITH TIPS RETORT. NATIONAL SPECIALTY CASES SHALL 

lATKJNMACCU 

kLLIIAVEJlOLI 

Z=ZERO C=CANDIDATE R=REFERENCE 

APPROVED BY: 

UTONTHEMATEMALSUBMITTEOTOTHEANALVTCALlAeaKATtXir. EVERY EFFORT HAS 

UABUTYMEXCESSOrirSESTAIILISIIEOniAKCEfCHIlllESEIIVICE. ASSAYED AT. NATIONAL 

BEEN MADOTO DETERMINE OOIECTu/EL' 

•.TONAL SJ-ECtALTY GASES. *W UNITED V 

Y TIE MFORMAIHN REQUESTED: HOWEVER. IN 

DRIVE. DURHAM. NT ITTI1 ftm*u-ll»l 
NATIONAL SPECIALTY CASES 

630 UNITED DRIVE 

DURHAM, NC 

27713 

(919)544-3772 

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS * EPA PROTOCOL MIXTURES 

REFERENCE*: 

EXP. DATE: 

88-48442 CYLINDER*: CC59855 CYL. PRESSURE: 

7/18/99 LAST ANALYSIS DATE: 7/18/96 CUSTOMER: 

2000 PSIG P.O.»: 

SOUTHEAST AIRGAS 

27181 

METHOD: ANALYZED ACCORDING TO EPA TRACEABILITY PROTOCOL FOR ASSAY AND CERTIFICATION OF GASEOUS CALIBRATION STANDARDS-SEPTEMBER 

I993:G-I THIS STANDARD SHOULD NOT BE USED WHEN ITS OAS PRESSURE IS BELOW I.O MEGAPASCALS (150 PSIG). 

COMPONENT: 

STANDARD 

SRM#: 

CYL.*: 

CONC: 

INSTRUMENT: 

MODEL #: 

SERIAL*: 

LAST CAL.: 

PROPANE 

I668B 

CLM 6439 

95.5 PPM 

ROSEMOUNT THC 

400A 

2000335 

7/6/96 

MEAN CONC: 

REPLICATE CONC. 

DATE: 7/18/96 

43.5 PPM 

43.4 PPM 

43.5 PPM 

43.5 PPM +/- 0.35 PPM 

BALANCE GAS: AIR 

REPLICATE DATA 

DATE: 7/18/96 

Z 0 R 

R 86.7 Z 

REPLICATE DATA | REPLICATE DATA 

86.7 

0 

39.5 

C 

C 

C 

C 

39.5 

39.4 

86.8 

•n 

I 

ANALYST „^S^% Z=ZERO C=CANDIDATE R=REFERENCE 

APPROVED BY: 

THIS RETORT STATED ACCURATELY THE RESULTS OF THE INVESTIGATION MADE UPON 

CONNECTION WITH THIS RETORT. NATIONAL SPECIALTY GASES SHAU. HA VE NO Ui 

I ATERIAL SUBMITTED TO THE ANALYTICAL LABORATORY. EVERY EFFORT HAS BEEN 

IN EXCESS OF rTS ESTABLISHED CHARGE FOR THE SERVICE. ASSAYED AT: NATIONAL 

Q Sm 

DETERMINE OBfecTI 

IALTY OASES. « 0 UNITED 

THE INFORMATION REQUESTED: HOWEVER. IN 

UVB. DURHAM. NC 1T7II. (tll)S4«-3771 

*"• 

00 
NATIONAL SPECIALTY GASES 

630 UNITED DRIVE 

DURHAM, NC 

27713 

(919)544-3772 

CERTIFICATE OFANALYSIS ' EPA PROTOCOL MIXTURES 

REFERENCE*: 

EXP. DATE 

88-48441 CYLINDER*: CC 16731 CYL. PRESSURE: 

7/18/99 LAST ANALYSIS DATE: 7/18/% CUSTOMER: 

2000 PSIO P.O.*: 

SOUTHEAST A1RGAS 

27181 

O 

•n 

METHOD: ANALYZED ACCORDING TO EPA TRACEABILITY PROTOCOL FOR ASSAY AND CERTIFICATION OF GASEOUS CALIBRATION STANDARDS-SEPTEMBER 

1993:G-1 THIS STANDARD SHOULD NOT BE USED WHEN ITS GAS PRESSURE IS BELOW 1.0 MEGAPASCALS (150 PSIG). 

COMPONENT: 

STANDARD 

SRM#: 

CYL. #: 

CONC: 

INSTRUMENT: 

MODEL*: 

SERIAL*: 

LAST CAL.: 

MEAN CONC: 

REPLICATE CONC 

PROPANE 

I668B 

CLM 6439 

95.5 PPM 

ROSEMOUNT THC 

400A 

2000335 

7/6/96 

92.6 PPM +/- 0.74 PPM 

DATE: 7/18/96 

92.6 

92.7 

92.6 

PPM 

PPM 

PPM 

1 

i 

1 

! 1 

1 

t 

1 

a 

BALANCE GAS: AIR 

REPLICATE DATA 

DATE: 

Z 

1

 R 

Z 

DATE 

Z 

R 

Z 

7/18/96 

0 

86.7 

0 

R 

Z 

c 

R 

Z 

C 

86.7 

0 

84.2 

C 

C 

R 

C 

C 

R 

84.1 

84.2 

86.8 

| REPLICATE DATA 

• 

1 

i 

| REPLICATE DATA 

1CCURATELY THE RESULTS OF THE MVESTIGATIONM 

Z=ZERO ^CANDIDATE R-REFERENCE 

ANALYST: : APPROVED BY: 

THIS RETORT HATED ACCURATELY TKERESULli C# THE MVESTIGATKIN MADEJUFON THE MATERIAL SUBMITTED TD TKE ANALYTICAL LABORATORY. EVERY EFFORT HAS BEEN MADE TODtTtRMlKE OBJECTIVELY lllE D*ORMAHON REQUESTED: HOWE VER.W 

coxwrnoN WITH na s RETORT, NATIOHAL SFECIUTY GASES SHALL HAVE NtpjABaiTYM EXCESS OF mESTABUSHEOouRa FOR HIE SERVICE ASSAYED AT NATIONAL SFECMLTY GASES. MIMIEDDRA'E.DURHAM.N C mil . mnm-nn 

AWxs Q>Sm 

CO 
NATIONAL SPECIALTY GASES 

630 UNITED DRIVE 

DURHAM, NC 

27713 

(919)544-3772 

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS * EPA PROTOCOL MIXTURES 

REFERENCE*: 

EXP. DATE: 

88-48444 

7/18/99 

CYLINDER*: 

LAST ANALYSIS DATE: 

CC 109844 

7/18/96 

CYL. PRESSURE: 

CUSTOMER: 

2000 PSIG P.O.«: 

SOUTHEAST AIRGAS 

27181 

^ 

- ^ 

METHOD: ANALYZED ACCORDING TO EPA TRACEABILITY PROTOCOL FOR ASSAY AND CERTIFICATION OF GASEOUS CAUBRATION STANDARDS-SEPTEMBER 

I993:G-1 THIS STANDARD SHOULD NOT BE USED WHEN ITS GAS PRESSURE IS BELOW 1.0 MEGAPASCALS (150 PSIO). 

COMPONENT: 

STANDARD 

SRM#: 

CYL.«: 

CONC: 

INSTRUMENT: 

MODEL*: 

SERIAL*: 

LAST CAL.: 

MEAN CONC: 

REPUCATECONC 

PROPANE 1 

| 

1669B 

CLM 789 J 

464 PPM i 

ROSEMOUNT THC 

400A 

2000335 

7/6/96 ..... . j 

259 PPM +/- 2.07 PPM 

DATE: 7/18/96 

259 

259 

258 

PPM 

PPM 

PPM 

BALANCE GAS: AIR 

•n 

I 

REPLICATE DATA 

DATE: 7/18/96 

| REPLICATE DATA | REPLICATE DATA 

Z 

R 

Z 

DATE 

Z 

R 

Z 

0 

42.3 

0 

R 

Z 

c 

R 

Z 

c 

42.3 

0 

23.6 

c 

c 

R 

C 

C 

R 

23.6 

23.6 

42.4 

l 

"^ 

'*< — 

Z-ZERO C*=CANDIDATE R-REFERENCE 

APPROVED BY: ytem. 0- Sfofat 

THU RETORT STATO ZSifeC'rcEYTiEReuL^ Bva»£FiwTiusbwMAD^nnw»qi«oai 

CONNECTION WIIH TWS REPCRT. NATIONAL SFEOALTY GASES SHALL HAVE NO/IABIUT Y M 4 EXCESS OT R S ESTABLISHED CHARGE FOR THE SEKVKZ. ASSAYED AT: NATIONAL .TV OASES. < M 

" THE INFORMATION REQUESTED: HOWEVER. W 

DRIVE. DURHAM. NC mil . (imSM-ITO 
NATIONAL SPECIALTY GASES 

630 UNITED DRIVE 

DURHAM, NC 

27713 

(919)544-3772 

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS * EPA PROTOCOL MIXTURES 

REFERENCE*: 

EXP. DATE: 

88-48445 CYLINDER*: CC 112086 CYL. PRESSURE: 

7/18/99 US T ANALYSIS DATE: 7/18/96 CUSTOMER: 

2000 PSIO P.O.*: 

SOUTHEAST AIRGAS 

27181 

o ••-• • 

METHOD: ANALYZED ACCORDING TO EPA TRACEABILITY PROTOCOL FOR ASSAY AND CERTIFICATION OF GASEOUS CALIBRATION STANDARDS-SEPTEMBER 

1993:0-1 THIS STANDARD SHOULD NOT BE USED WHEN ITS GAS PRESSURE IS BELOW 1.0 MEGAPASCALS (ISO PSIG). 

BALANCE GAS: AIR 

| REPLICATE DATA | REPLICATE DATA 

I 

ui 

REPLICATE DATA 

DATE: 7/18/96 

Z 

R 

Z 

DATE 

Z 

R 

Z 

0 

42.3 

0 

R 

Z 

c 

42.3 

0 

41.5 

C 

C 

R 

41.4 

41.5 

42.4 

ANALYST: 

THIS REFORT STATED ACCURATELY TKE RESULTS OF THE 11 

CONNECTION WIIH THB REFORT. NATIOHAL SFEOALTY GASES SHALL HAVE HO L 

Z-ZERO OCANDIDATE R-REFERENCE 

APPROVED BY: 

THE MATERIAL SUBMITTED TO *HE ANALYTICAL LABORATORY. EVERY EFFORT HAS BEEH MADE 

Dl EXCESS o r n s OTABt__D CHARGE FOR THE SERVKX ASSAYED AT: NATIONAL 

'/ S(UJL 

TY OASES (M l 

t THE DCORMATWN REQUESTED: HOWEVER. D« 

rDRJVt. DURHAM, HC 277IL <Hf04MT n 
NATIONAL SPECIALTY GASES 

630 UNITED DRIVE 

DURHAM, NC 

27713 

(919)544-3772 

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS> EPA PROTOCOL MIXTURES 

REFERENCE*: 

EXP. DATE: 

88-48446 CYLINDER*: CC 109679 ' CYL. PRESSURE: 

7/18/99 LAST ANALYSIS DATE: 7/18/96 CUSTOMER: 

2000PSIQ < P.O.*: 

SOUTHEAST AIRGAS 

27181 

METHOD: ANALYZED ACCORDING TO EPA TRACEABILITY PROTOCOL FOR ASSAY AND CERTIFICATION OF GASEOUS CAUBRATION STANDARDS-SEPTEMBER 

I993:G-1 THIS STANDARD SHOULD NOT BE USED WHEN ITS GAS PRESSURE IS BELOW 1.0 MEGAPASCALS (150 PSIG). 

COMPONENT: 

STANDARD 

SRM#: 

CYL. *: 

CONC: 

INSTRUMENT: 

MODEL*: 

SERIAL*: 

LAST CAL.: 

MEAN CONC: 

REPLICATE CONC 

PROPANE 

I669B 

CLM 789 

464 PPM 

ROSEMOUNT THC 

400A 

2000335 

7/6/96 

933 PPM +/-

DATE: 7/18/96 

933 

932 

933 

PPM 

PPM 

PPM 

i 

7.46 PPM 

i 

I 

•' 

| 

i 

i 

1 

: 

BALANCE GAS: AIR 

•n 

I 

Ot. 

REPLICATE DATA 

DATE: 7/18/96 

Z 0 

| REPLICATE DATA | REPLICATE DATA 

R 

Z 

DATE 

Z 

R 

Z 

42.3 

0 

R 

Z 

c 

42.3 

0 

85.3 

C 

C 

R 

85.1 

85.0 

42.4 

ANALYST: 

THIS REFORT STATED ACCURATELY THE RESULTS OF 1 

CONNECTION WITH THIS REFORT. NATIONAL SPECIALTY CASES SHALL HAVE NO LIABILITY H 

Z=ZER O ^CANDIDAT E R-REFERENCE 

APPROVED BY: __ 

IAL SUBMITTED TO THB ANALYTICAL LABORATORY. EVERY EFFORT HAS BEEN MADB 

KESS OF n S ESTABUSHED CHARGE FOR THE SERVICE. ASSAYED AT: NATIONAL 

ECTIVEL/TH E INFORMATION REQUESTED. HOWEVER. IN 

s, DURHAM, MC mn . 0irtu*-im 

y 

i-o 
P.13 

Scott Specialty Gases 

6141 EASTON ROAD 

PLUMSTEAOVILLE 

Phone: 215-766-8861 

PA 18949-0310 

CERTIFICAT E O F 

PO BOX 310 

Fax: 215-766-207 0 

ANALYSI S 

ROY F WESTON, INC 

BOBBY BETTS 

1635 PUMPHREY AVE 

AUBURN AL 36830 

PROJECT #: 01-87056-001 

PO#: CREDIT CARD 

ITEM #: 0104255 4 

DATE: 2/01/97 

SCOTT LOT#: 703006 

COMPONENT 

STYRENE MONOMER 

NITROGEN 

ANALYTICAL ACCURACY: 

PRODUCT EXPIRATION: 

REQUESTED GAS 

CQNC 

+ -5% 

6/01/1997 

ANALYSIS 

(MOLES) 

10. PPM 

BALANCE 

9.43 PPM 

BALANCE 

MANUFACTURED DATE: 1/30/97 

ANALYST: 

SCOTTY SIZE: 4 

•CJ-_\.

 s\£<r.-> v o *^_5 

AL ROJAS 

FREMONT. CA SAN BERNAROINO. CA LONGMONT. CO CHICAGO. IL WAKEFIELD. MA TROY. Ml BREDA. THE NETHERLANDS p_ 7 

DURHAM. NC SOUTH PLAINFIELD. NJ SARNIA. ONTARIO PLUMSTEAOVILLE. PA PASADENA. TX SHEFFORD. UNITED KINGDOM 

if 
P.M 

POST-TEST EQUIPMENT CALIBRATIONS 

Client MfW o 

Test Team Leader 

Work Order No.))i*l.$-c?d2-Jo,> 

Test Dates 

Due Date Z~)G-7~7 

2.-*W7 

Probe No._ 

Probe No.. 

Probe No.. 

Probe No. 

Pitot Tube No._ 

Pitot Tube No._ 

Pitot Tube No._ 

Pitot Tube No. 

Meter Box No.. 

Meter Box No._ 

Meter Box No.. 

Meter Box No. 

im 

Avg. Stack Temp.. 

Avg. Stack Temp.. 

Avg. Stack Temp.. 

Avg. Stack Temp., 

Highest Vacuum. 

Highest Vacuum. 

Highest Vacuum. 

Highest Vacuum. 

Avg. AH_ 

Avg. AH_ 

Avg. AH. 

Avg. AH_ 

Singer DGM No._ 

Singer DGM No._ 

Singer DGM No._ 

Sinaer DGM No. 

Flow Rate 

Flow Rate_ 

Flow Rate 

Flow Rate 

VOST Box No.. 

VOST Box No. 

VOST Box No.. 

VOST Box No. 

HH Thennocouple No. )cT?%y 

HH Thermocouple No. 

HH Thennocouple No. 

HH Thermocouple No. 

Flow Rate 

Flow Rate 

Flow Rate. 

Flow Rate 

Avg. Temp.. 

Avg. Temp.. 

Avg. Temp.. 

Avg. Temp.. 

7"Q 

Rotameter No.. 

Rotameter No._ 

Rotameter No.. 

Rotameter No. 

'.: CE.NERAL,ADMNFORM,TAR-73.FRM TAR-73 1193 

113 
PITOT TUBE CALIBRATION 

DATE 3- i X„ . 9 7 

PITOT TUBE ID NO. P&4 

PROBE ID NO. ~ 

PITOT TUBE ASSEMBLY LEVEL? ^ye s no 

PITOT TUBE OPENINGS DAMAGED? yes •*****- no 

PITOT TUBE COEFFICIENT 0.84? ^ye s no 

CHECKED BY 

/ 

i •AI \ q 

lim a -.J£&--®@L.-. 

I - T 

l«M ••« — 

H-t '--E 

"^T 

x: 

'^^.J^--' 

. ^^_ .^fcTl^M*»- fc"*****- -

la 

c 

o,- a • (<icn.a, - <g> • (<i<n. 

ft - _L J (<sn. P, - _i_ # (<sp 

7 - J. *• e • ( : A - £^yjin.) 

Z - A sin7- O*0?~ (In.); <0.125 

w . A sin9 - O-O ( (In.); <0.031 

P* 0-3/7 (In.) P» o-ll! (In.) 

D,-_4i2££_(ln.) 

_L 

" " »«•« 

Paoe of 

).|.MAASMNFO«l«TAIlOaFM« TAXO0 3V91 

nH 

». 80TTW V.Oi. SWMNC HINIIUI PIT0T-WI2U »«»TI0N . 

/gw f 

• tlDC vlH i TO PWVfMT PIIOT TWt FWW 

n< IMTOT nae SMNJ. at cvw .iw o« MOW TW 

•ottLC W W PVAMC. 

{7»i.a«<Mai 

S3C 

2p . £ 

SD 

I I I I HIHIHI-MIIIIII I 

»«4lM«Ma>|-VllMJ<1*»i 

X - . 

Z - . 

Y -

(ln.);>0.750 

(In.); >2.0 

. (In.); >3.0 

POSTTEST CHECK 

cnantJOJJL 

Work Ordar No. u&S&L&QZtZDJDd. 

pat. y pr Ffi*eS g?> 

Damage Found? _____ yaa 

Chackad by _« £ 

Commants tf #•> V f 

no 

F-9 
P.16 

STACK TEMPERATURE SENSOR CALIBRATION DATA FORM 

Reference: Digital Thermometer - Wahi Model C-65 NIST 

Thermocouple Number: 10788A 

Date: 23 MARCH 95 

Ambient Temperature, |F: 81 

Calibrator: LOF 

Reference 

Point 

Number 

1 A 

B 

C 

2 A 

B 

C 

3 A 

B 

C 

Temp Diff (%) 

Reference 

Temperature, 

35.0 

35.0 

35.0 

160.0 

159.0 

159.0 

478.0 

478.0 

477.0 

* 

(Ref Temp, 

IF 

IF 

Thermocouple 

Potentiometer 

Temperature, 

35.0 

35.0 

35.0 

160.0 

159.0 

159.0 

478.0 

478.0 

478.0 

+ 460) - (Therm Pot 

Ref Temp, |F + 460 

F 

Temp, 

Temperature 

Difference, 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.11 

|F + 460) 

X 1< 

Are all temperature differences less than 1.5 % ? Yes 

Avg Stack 

Temp, |F 

POSTTEST STACK TEMPERATURE SENSOR CALIBRATION DATA 

Client: UBfe6~ 

Work Order Number: \\c~£.k ~on%.- ftp f 

Date: 7 FEB3*1 

Reference 

Temperature 

Calibrator: 

IF 

The rmo c oup1e 

Temperature, |F 

Temperature 

Difference, 

22. 74 n 

Was a pretest temperature correctio n used? 

Ts temperature differenc e within 1:5 % ? 

!fes X No 

No 

If no, calculations done once with recorded values and once with 

corrected values. 

F-10 

US' 
P.17 

I 

JL*"".1! T 

G

#

;GILMONT 

M.*' INSTRUMENTS. INC. 

® 

•MEASURED AND FLOWING AT 

1 ATM. AND 70 DEG. F. 

» . • • 

Correlated Flow, Table 

Flowmeter Cat. No. SIZE: I 

Serial Nb. 10301 - 10400 

Float Type GLASS $-/ J 

Fluid Name AIR 

SCALE 

DIVISION 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

. ! 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

FLOW RATE 

ML/MIN 

0.780 

1.09 

1.47 

1.91 

2.43 

6 ' . 

7 

8 

5*~ '"• 

-0 

3.0 3 

3.7 0 

4.4 6 

"~ •; j~5.30' 

6.2 3 

7.26 

8.37 

9.59 

10.9 

12.3 

16 

17 

18 

19 

IU 

13.8 

15.5 

17.2 

.-iy.'-l 

• 2i'.'l 

23.3 

25.5 

27.8 

30.0 

32.4 

SCALE 

DIVISION 

26 

27 

28 

29 

30 

31 

32 

33 

35 

36 

37 

38 

39 

40 

41 

,42 

,-442 

44' 

45 

ll 

46 

At . 

49 

50 

FLOW RATE) 

ML/MIN 

34.8 

37.4 

40.0 

42.6 

45.3 

48.0 

50.8 

53.6 

"~ oc.5 

59.4 

- 62.3 

65.3 

68.4 

71.5 

74.6 

77.8 

81.0 

84.2 

87.5 

90.8 

94.2 

97.6 

101 

104 

\ 108 

SCALE 

DIVISION 

51 

52 

53 

54 

55 

56 

57 

58 

"S9~ 

60 

61. 

62 

63 

64 

65 

66 

67 

68. 

69 

70 

71 

72 

73 

74 

75 

FLOW RATE 

ML/MIN 

111 

115 

118 

122 

126 

129 

133 

137 

140 

144 

148 

151 

155 

159 

163 

167 

170 

_17 4 

17 8 

182 

186 

190 

193 

197 

201 

SCALE 

DIVISION 

'76 

77 

78 

79 

80 

81 

82 

83 

"84 

85 

86 

87 

88 

89 

90 

91 

92 

93 

94 

95 

96 

97 

98 

99 

100 

\\L> 

FLOW RATEI 

ML/MIN ' 

205 

209 

213 

217 

221 

225 

229 

233 

237 

241 

245 

"249 

253 

257 

261 

265 

269 

274 

278 

282 

286 

290 

294 

298 

303 

F-11 
P.18 

ATTACHMENT 3 

Report - Emission Measurements GFK-Werk Meumarkt 

Firma Pfleiderer Infrastrukturtechnik 

in 
P.19 

Dr. Rietzler 

Laboratory for Environmental Analysis 

Schnorrstrasse 5a 

90471 Nuremberg 

Telephone 0911/86 88 20 

Fax 09 11/86 88 222 

Project site: 

Client: 

Responsible authority: 

Contract date: 

Date of measurement: 

REPORT 

Emission Measurements 

GFK-Werk Neumarkt 

Firma Pfleiderer Infrastrukturtechnik 

Firma Pfleiderer Infrastrukturtechnik 

Sulzbuerger Str. 8 

92318 Neumarkt 

Firma Pfleiderer Infrastrukturtechnik 

Ingolstaedter Str. 51 

92318 Neumarkt 

Office of the Chief Administrative Officer 

March 2001 

3/14/01 

Project manager: M. Hummel (Environmental engineer) 

Our symbol/Project code: PFI.NEU21 3/14/01 

Location, date: Nuremberg, 5/4/01 

Total 3 copies issued 

10 pages of report 

2 appendices 

Test laboratory accredited by the German Testing Accreditation System (DAP) by the Bavarian State Trade Institute 

(LGA). 

Accreditation applies to the test procedures listed in the document (Registration no. DAP-P-02 029 00-91-04) 

Announced as a measurement office pursuant to 3 26,28, Federal Immission Protection Law and 312 Paragraph 7 of 

the 2nd Federal Immission Protection Act 

Certified by AQS Regional Headquarters Bavaria/Approved pursuant to 3 3 Sewerage Act and 3 19 Drinking Water 

Act 

U* 
P.20 

1. Measurement task 

1.1 Client 

Firma Pfleiderer Infrastrukturtechnik GmbH & Co. KG, Ingolstaedter Str. 51 in 

92318 Neumarkt. 

1.2 Operator 

See item 2.1. 

1.3 Location 

The system is located in a production shed at the site named under item 2.3 

1.4 System 

System for processing of liquid UP resins with added styrene. 

1.5 Date of sampling 

Samples were taken on 3/14/01. It is a first measurement. 

1.6 Cause 

Measurement of emissions within the framework of an registration process 

pursuant to B 67 Paragraph 2 of the Federal Immission Protection Law. 

1.7 Formulation of the task 

Determination of mass concentrations and mass flows of the organic substances 

contained in the exhaust air of the centrifuge banks (No. 3.1.7 Technical Air 

Pollution Abatement Instructions [TAPAI]) and determination of the emissions 

formed when storage tanks Bl - B4 are being filled. 

1.8 Measurement components 

The following components were detected in the GC-MS screening: 

2 llf 
P.21 

Table 4. Measurement components 

Measurement component 

Benzene 

Toluene 

Ethyl benzene 

p-/m-/o-xylene 

Styrene 

Cumene 

Trimethyl benzenes 

2-Ethyl toluene 

3-/4-Ethyl toluene 

Acetic acid isobutyl ester 

n-Butylacetate 

Substance class as per TAPAI 

2.3.III 

3.1.7.II 

3.1.7.II 

3.1.7.II 

3.1.7.II 

3.1.7.II 

3.1.7.II 

3.1.7.II 

3.1.7.II 

3.1.7.III 

3.1.7.III 

1.9 Coordination of the measurement schedule 

The measurement schedule was coordinated with Mr. Klauer (Fa. Pfleiderer). 

1.10 Participants in sampling 

Samples and measurements were taken on site by Mr. M. Hummel 

(environmental engineer). 

1.11 Participation of other institutions 

All measurements were taken and studies were carried out by the laboratory of 

Dr. Rietzler. 

1.12 Technical manager 

Dr. Rietzler, Schnorrstr. 5a, 90471, Nuremberg is recorded as technically 

responsible (Tel. 0911/868820). 

2. Description of the system, substances handled 

2.1 Description of the system 

The system is used to produce masts from glass fiber-reinforced plastic. The 

important system components are the following: 

- storage tanks (Bl - B4) 

- daily storage tank (B5) 

- mixing station 

\V0 
P.22 

- centrifuge banks (Sl - S3) 

The UP resin is pumped into the daily storage tank B5 from storage tanks Bl - B4 

and is heated to roughly 30°C. A stipulated amount of resin from tank B5 is 

weighed into a receiving container. At the mixing station the weighed and 

homogenized loads are added to the resin according to the formulation. 

Actual production of masts takes place on the centrifuge banks (S1-S3) in molds 

which run cylindrically or conically, which are composed-of several lengths, and 

which are closed on the end with a closure plate. The mast molds are supported 

with flanges on the drive rollers of the centrifuge banks. 

The reinforcing material is added to the slowly rotating mold and the rpm are 

increased to 900-1100. 

Application devices consist of a pump and control unit, the feedstock and 

auxiliary substance containers, and one injection gun each. When the injection 

gun is activated, resin and curing agent are delivered to the mixing battery of the 

injection gun in a formulation-specific ratio and they are thoroughly mixed there. 

The reaction mixture is injected with the injection gun into the rotating mast mold 

in which it is uniformly distributed on the inside of the mast mold by centrifugal 

force and impregnates the reinforcing material. 

The injected amount of resin is recorded by the control unit and indicated; when 

the set preselected amount is reached this is moreover optically indicated on the 

injection gun. To accelerate the curing of the masts, electrical heating elements 

are mounted on the two sides of the centrifuge banks. 

The injection process lasts 5-10 minutes, the curing process roughly 20-30 

minutes, the entire process of producing a mast blank is roughly 30-60 minutes. 

2.2 Type of system 

System for producing moldings and finished products from glass-fiber reinforced 

plastics (GFK) using unsaturated polyester resins (UP resins) with added styrene. 

The system should be classified pursuant to the 4th Federal Immission Protection 

Act under 5.7 in column 2. 

2.3 Location of the system 

2.3.1 Location 

Sulzbuerger Str. 8 

92318 Neumarkt 

(Corridor no. 2131) 

2.3.2 Emission sources 

4 m 
P.23 

2.3.2.1 Emission source 1 

The volume of gas displaced when the storage tanks B1-B4 are being 

filled with UP resin is discharged to the atmosphere via a vent pipe. 

Table 1. Emission source 1 

Legal value 

High value 

Absolute geod. value (m) 

Height above ground (m) 

4460586 

5458046 

427 

7.0 

2.3.2.2 Emission source 2 

The emissions formed on the centrifuge banks are collected via fume 

hoods, exhausted and emitted via the chimney, and it can be assumed that 

due to this exhaust no noteworthy diffuse emissions occur. 

Table 2. Emission source 2 

Legal value 

High value 

Absolute geod. value (m) 

Exit area (m2) 

Height above ground (m) 

4460570 

5458041 

427 

0.035 

11.5 

2.4 Feedstock 

Table 3. Feedstock 

The indicated amounts are referenced to one batch in the receiving container. 

Feedstock 

UP resin 

Dye paste 

Accelerator 

Paraffin solution 

UV absorber solution 

Curing agent 

TOTAL 

SIRESTER FS 4131 

OLDOPAL, or 

VETROPHEN 

PERGAQUICK C 125% 

Paraffin and 95% Styrene 

10% TINUVIN 320 and 

90% Styrene 

PEROXAN A 40 L 

180.00 kg 

9.00 kg 

2.30 kg 

2.70 kg 

9.00 kg 

3.15 kg 

206.15 kg 

v^ vi- $h> l/tjL^-«_ 

IW-
P.24 

2.5 Operating times 

2.5.1 Total operating time 

The system is operated in two-shifts, Monday-Friday, from 0600 to 2200 

hours. 

2.5.2 Emission times 

2.5.2.1 Emission source 1 

Twice monthly for 1 hour at a time. In the period from Monday-Friday 

between 0600 and 2200 hours. 

2.5.2.2 Emission source 2 

Workdays 16 hours, Monday-Friday from 0600 to 2200 hours. 

2.6 Device for collecting and reducing emission 

2.6.1 Collection of emission 

Only the emissions which form in actual mast production are collected 

(emission source 2). 

The volume of air displaced when the storage tanks (B1-B4) are being 

filled is discharged to the atmosphere via the vent line of the tanks. 

2.6.1.1 Emission collection system 

Emissions are intaken by a suction draft fan. 

2.6.1.2 Collection elements 

Collection takes place via exhaust hoods on the centrifuge banks S1-S3 on 

the intake side to the fan. 

2.6.2 Emission reduction systems 

Emission reduction systems are not installed. Installing a gas displacement 

line between the daily storage tank B5 and the UP resin storage resulted in 

no emissions into the atmosphere being formed when tank B5 is being 

filled. 

3 Description of sampling sites 

in 
P.25 

3.1 Location of the measurement cross sections 

3.1.1 Emission source 1 

The samples were taken from the gaseous phase of the daily 

storage tank B5. 

3.1.2 Emission source 2 

The measurement cross section for emission measurements on the 

exhaust air side is roughly 1.5 m behind the fan. 

Table 5. Measurement cross section 

Measurement cross section 

Geometry 

Diameter 

Cross section 

round 

210 mm 

0.035 mA 

3.1.2.1 Measurement axes 

The gaseous components to be measured can be measured at one 

measurement point as a result of optimum swirling in the fan. 

4. Measurement and analysis processes, Equipment 

4.1 Determination of exhaust gas boundary conditions 

Table 6. Measurement instruments for measuring the boundary conditions 

No. 

4.1.1 

4.1.2 

4.1.3 

4.1.4 

Parameter 

Flow velocity 

Static pressure 

in the exhaust 

gas chimney 

Air pressure at 

the height of 

the 

measurement 

point 

Exhaust gas 

temperature 

Meas. principle 

Prandtl pressure 

tube 

Piezoresistive 

differential 

pressure gauge 

Piezoresistive 

absolute 

pressure 

transducer 

Pt100 * 1 

Type 

DPS 

APS 

ZA 9030-FS1 

Make 1 

Ahlborn Co. 

Ahlborn Co. 

Ahlborn Co. 

Ahlborn Co. 

7 ivH 
P.26 

4.2 Gaseous emissions 

4.2.1 Discontinuous measurement processes 

4.2.1.1 Sampling 

Adsorption of organic components on activated charcoal tubes type G 

from Fa. Draeger. 

4.2.1.2 Analysis 

See Table 4 in 2.8 and Appendix 2. 

4.2.2 Continuous measurement processes 

Measurement of total C emissions by means of flame ionization 

detector VE 7 from Fa. J.U.M. (Qualification test available) 

Calibration was done with methane as the test gas (test certificate 

can be inspected). 

5. Operating state of the system during measurements 

During the sampling interval of 2.75 hours 9 masts were produced; resin 

consumption was 235 kg. All three centrifuge banks Sl - S3 were in operation 

Extrapolated shift output: 

Maximum shift output: 

Utilization of the system: 

684 kg resin 

900 kg resin 

76% 

6 Measurement results and discussion 

6.1 Boundary conditions 

The physical boundary conditions were recorded during measurements. 

6.1.1 Ambient conditions 

Table 7. Ambient boundary conditions 

Temperature 

Air pressure 

Relative humidity 

6-8 degrees C 

957 hPa 

52-56% 

/Li 
P.27 

6.1.2 Exhaust gas boundary conditions 

The following data were established in the measurement cross section of 

the emission source 2. 

Table 8. Exhaust gas boundary conditions 

Measurement quantity 

Temperature 

Abs. humidity 

Static pressure 

Volumetric flow, average 

Volumetric flow, tr. average 

Volumetric flow, normal state 

Unit 

degrees C 

g/cubic meter 

HPa 

cubic meters/h 

cubic meters/h 

cubic Nm/h 

24 

roughly 7 

roughly 1 

2520 

2500 

2330 

6.2 Measurements of gases 

6.2.1 Emission source 1 

6.2.1.1 Discontinuous measurement 

Table 9. Results for emission source 1 

Substance class 

TAPAI 

2.3.III 

3.1.7.II 

mg/Nm 

0.61 

29493 

Boundary value 

TAPAI mg/m3 

g/h 

5 

100 

Emission g/h 

roughly 0.012 

roughly 590 

Boundary value 

TAPAI g/h 

25 

2000 

For assessment purposes the averages from two measurements were used, 

the components 2-ethyl toluene and 3/4-ethyl toluene were assigned to 

class 3.1.7 III. The results of individual measurements can be taken from 

the test report (Appendix). 

The total emission was computed under the assumption that the storage 

tanks are completely emptied and the filling process lasts 1 hour. 

6.2.2 

6.2.2.1 Discontinuous measurements 

J. 

,j* °" 

Emission source 2 

o*o ^ 

Two half-hour averages were taken. It becomes apparent from the study ^ ^ I** 

result that the composition of the exhaust air changes with respect to the ^^./o^ 

concentration of individual components depending on the operating state 

|7> 
P.28 

of the system. This is in conformity with the continuous total carbon 

measurement which likewise shows fluctuations of emission depending on 

the operating state. 

Measurements yielded the following results relative to standard 

conditions: 

Table 10. Results of emission source 2 

Substance class 

TAPAI 

3.1.7.II 

3.1.7.III 

mg/NmJ 

54.35 

0.40 

Boundary value 

TAPAI mg/m3 

g/h 

100 

150 

Emission g/h 

roughly 126 

roughly 0.9 

Boundary value 

TAPAI g/h 

2000 

3000 

For assessment purposes the averages from two measurements were used, 

the component acetic acid isobutyl ester was assigned to class 3.1.7 III. 

The results of individual measurements can be taken from the test report 

(Appendix). 

6.2.2.2 Continuous measurement 

In the established composition of pollutants with 96% styrene portion the 

continuous measurement yields a picture of the styrene emissions or class 

3.1.7 II emissions which takes into account the changing emission 

conditions. The total C emissions were therefore converted to styrene. 

Half-hour average 

1 

2 

3 

4 

Measurement time 

interval 

11.15-11.45 

11.45-12.15 

12.15-12.45 

12.45-13.45 

Measured value in 

g/m3 styrene 

0.42 

0.52 

0.15 

0.42 

Emission in g/h 

styrene (extrap.) 

980 

1210 

350 

980 

Table 11. Half-hour averages 

The average is 0.33 g/m3 or 770 g/h styrene for the entire measurement 

interval. 

The exact progression of the measurement can be taken from the graphic 

evaluation (appendix). 

6.3 Prediction of emissions for the system at full load 

10 111 
P.29 

Prediction is possible here only for the maximum shift output since a uniform, 

representative operating state of the system cannot be established due to the 

various operating states on the individual centrifuge banks. 

Extrapolation of the average over the entire measurement interval of 770 g/h for 

system utilization of 76% yields roughly 1010 g/h styrene as the full load 

emission value. 

If the half-hour average 2 (worst-case) of 1210 g/h is used for extrapolation, this 

yields a full load emission value of roughly 1590 g/h styrene. 

6.4 Evaluation 

6.4.1 Emission source 1 

Measurements show that the emitted substances can be assigned to 

substance group 3.1.7 II of the Technical Air Pollution Abatement 

Instructions. The main component with a proportion of more than 96% is 

styrene, other compounds are present in part only in trace concentrations. 

Furthermore, it can be stated that the time-referenced boundary value of 

2000 g/h for substances of class 3.1.7. II with roughly 590 g/h is certainly 

maintained, the boundary value referenced to the volumetric flow of 

exhaust air of 0.1 g/m3 is however exceeded with roughly 29.5 g/m3. 

The boundary value referenced to the volumetric flow of exhaust air is 

however not relevant as a result of the low total emission amount. 

This emission could under certain circumstances be prevented by a gas 

displacement line between the tanker truck and the storage tanks B1-B4 

during the filling process. This emission reduction system is not necessary 

according to the Technical Air Pollution Abatement Instructions. 

6.4.2 Emission source 2 

Measurements show that the emitted substances can be assigned to 

substance group 3.1.7 II of the Technical Air Pollution Abatement 

Instructions. The main component with a proportion of more than 96% is 

styrene, other compounds are present in part only in trace concentrations. 

Furthermore it can be stated that the time-referenced boundary value of 

2000 g/h for substances of class 3.1.7. II of the Technical Air Pollution 

Abatement Instructions is certainly maintained, but the boundary value 

referenced to the volumetric flow of exhaust air of 0.1 g/m3 is to some 

11 \tH 
P.30 

extent greatly exceeded during production hours, as continuous 

measurements show (see 6.2.2.2) 

The boundary value referenced to the volumetric flow of exhaust air is 

however not relevant here either as a result of the low total emission 

amount. 

An emission reduction system is therefore not necessary. 

6.4.3 Diffuse emissions 

When the receiving container is being filled from the daily storage tank 

and when the auxiliary agents and the charge are being mixed, diffuse 

emissions occur repeatedly in the area of the hall on a daily basis. These 

emissions are however largely collected by the exhaust system on the 

centrifuge banks and are thus contained in the exhaust air of the emission 

source 2 and the corresponding measurement results. 

Diffuse emissions are not a problem with respect to the emission situation. 

Questions of industrial safety and workplace concentrations were not the 

subject of study. 

Nuremberg, 5/9/01 

Author: 

for 

[Signature] [Signature] 

Dr. Rietzler Martin Hummel 

(Environmental engineer) 

Appendix: 1. Description of the measurement process 

2. Laboratory test report 

12 /*-? 
Appendix 1.1 

Emission measurement at the GFK-Werk Neumarkt of Firma Pfleiderer Infrastrukturtechnik on 3/14/01 

x axis - emissions in g/m 

discontinuous 

measurement 1 

discontinuous 

measurement 2 

o 

13 

y axis - time 
Appendix 1.2 

Half-hour averages of emission measurement at the GFK-Werk Neumarkt of Firma Pfleiderer Infrastrukturtechnik on 

3/14/01 

x axis - emissions in g/Nm3 styrene 

vO 

y axis - half-hour average 

14 
P.33 

Dr. Rietzler 

Schnorrstrasse 5a 

90471 Nuremberg 

Laboratory for Environmental Analysis 

Pfleiderer Verkehrstechnik GmbH 

Mr. Klaassen 

Ingolstaedter Str. 51 

92318 Neumarkt 

222 

Schnorrstrasse 5a 

90471 Nuremberg 

Telephone 09 11/86 88 20 

Fax 09 11/86 88 

Date 

4/23/01 

TEST REPORT 010938/PFLNEU21-ur 

Client: 

Client address: 

Sampling site: 

Sampler: 

Sampling date: 

Sample arrival date: 

Test interval: 

Page: 

Pfleiderer Verkehrstechnik GmbH 

Ingolstaedter Str. 51, 92318 Neumarkt 

Neumarkt 

Hummel 

3/14/01 

3/14/01 

3/14/01 - 4/20/01 

Iof 4 

Test laboratory accredited by the German Testing Acaeditation System (DAP) by the Bavarian State Trade Institute 

(LGA). 

Accreditation applies to the test procedures listed in the document (Registration no. DAP-P-02 029 00-91-04) 

Announced as a measurement office pursuant to 3 26,28, Federal Immission Protection Law and 3 12 Paragraph 7 of 

the 2nd Federal Immission Protection Act 

Certified by AQS Regional Headquarters Bavaria/Approved pursuant to 3 3 Sewerage Act and 3 19 Drinking Water 

Act 

Test results apply exclusively to the aforementioned samples. 

The test report may not be reproduced in extract form without the written permission of the test laboratory. 

Postal Bank Nuremberg Account no. 41118-8555 BLZ 760 10085 

City Savings Bank Nuremberg Account no. 1179 246 BLZ 760 601 01 

15 
P.34 

Page 2 of 4 

STUDY RESULTS GC/MS SCREENING 

Sample: 

Emission 1 

Method: 

Laboratorv number 

104020 

The activated charcoal was extracted with carbon disulfide. An aliquot of the 

extract was then analyzed under the following conditions: 

- Technique Gas chromatography 

- Detector Mass selective detector ion trap MAGNUM Finnigan MAT 

- Temperature range 40°C to 230°C 

- Mass range 4- - 240 amu 

- Column DB-VRX capillary column 

- Automatic injection 2 microliter splitless 

- Carrier gas Helium 5.0 

Identification was done using the retention time and by computer-aided 

comparison of the sample spectra with library spectra. 

The following libraries were available for comparison: 

- NIST Mass Spectra Library (roughly 62000 compounds) 

- General Purpose Library (roughly 5000 compounds) 

- Toxicology Library (roughly 3000 compounds) 

- Terpene Library (roughly 700 compounds) 

Result: Emission 1 -104020 

The following substance groups were detected. 

Highly volatile aromatic hydrocarbons: 

Benzene 

Toluene 

Ethyl benzene 

p-/m-xylene 

0-Xylene 

Styrene 

Cumene 

Trimethyl benzenes 

2-Ethyl toluene 

3-/4-Ethyl toluene 

0.008 mg/m3 

1.3 mg/m3 

0.066 mg/m3 

0.12 mg/m3 

0.020 mg/m3 

63 mg/m3 

0.010 mg/m3 

0.017 mg/m3 

0.004 mg/m3 

0.010 mg/m3 

»

 m 
P.35 

Esters 

Acetic acid isobutyl esters 0.18 mg/m3 

n-Butyl acetate 0.17 mg/m3 

Test results apply exclusively to the aforementioned samples. 

The test report may not be reproduced in extract form without the written permission of 

the test laboratory. 

17 
P.36 

Page 3 of 4 

Result: Emission 2 -104021 

The following substance groups were detected: 

Highly volatile aromatic hydrocarbons: 

Benzene 0.009 mg/m3 

Toluene 0.63 mg/m3 

Ethyl benzene 0.061 mg/m3 

p-/m-xylene 0.12 mg/m3 

o-Xylene 0.026 mg/m3 

Styrene 33 mg/m3 

Cumene 0.011 mg/m3 

Trimethyl benzenes 0.023 mg/m3 

2-Ethyltoluene 0.005 mg/m3 

3-/4-Ethyl toluene 0.050 mg/m3 

Esters 

Acetic acid isobutyl esters 0.21 mg/m3 

n-Butyl acetate 0.20 mg/m3 

Result: Storage tank 1 -104022 

The following substance groups were detected: 

Highly volatile aromatic hydrocarbons: 

Benzene 

Toluene 

Ethyl benzene 

p-/m-Xylene 

0.66 

1.000 

32 

16 

o-Xylene eclipsed by styrene 

Styrene 

Cumene 

Trimethyl benzenes 

2-Ethyl toluene 

3-/4-Ethyl toluene 

mg/m3 

mg/m3 

mg/m3 

mg/m3 

mg/m3 

33.000 mg/m3 

6.9 

6.4 

0.34 

1.4 

mg/m 

mg/m3 

mg/m3 

mg/m3 

Test results apply exclusively to the aforementioned samples. 

The test report may not be reproduced in extract form without the written permission of 

the test laboratory. 

/3S 

18 
P.37 

Page 4 of 4 

Result: Storage tank 2 -104023 

The following substance groups were detected: 

Highly volatile aromatic hydrocarbons: 

Benzene 

Toluene 

Ethyl benzene 

p-/m-Xylene 

0.48 

870 

18 

9.3 

o-Xylene eclipsed by styrene 

Styrene 

Cumene 

Trimethyl benzenes 

2-Ethyl toluene 

3-/4-Ethyl toluene 

Nuremberg, 4/23/01 

[Signature] 

Dr. Rietzler 

mg/m3 

mg/m3 

mg/m3 

mg/m3 

mg/m3 

20,000 mg/mJ 

3.3 

7.8 

0.16 

0.27 

mg/m 

mg/m3 

mg/m3 

mg/m3 

Test results apply exclusively to the aforementioned samples. 

The test report may not be reproduced in extract form the written permission of the test 

laboratory. 

&(* 

19 
P.38 

Appendix to Study Report (PFLNEU21/010938) 

Sample: Laboratorv number: 

Emissionl 104020 

Chromatogram Plot C:\MAGNUM\DATA\184028 Date: 4/12/01 23:08:31 

Comment: PFLNEUZ1 Emissionl 3/14/01 Ak TypeG GC/GM Screening 

Scan no: 695 Retention time: 11:35 RIC:3889741 

Mass Range: 48 - 237 

Plotted: 695 to 1920 Range 1 to 1920 100% = 60748651 

1.56% 

Test results apply exclusively to the aforementioned samples. 

The test report may not be reproduced in extract form without the written permission of 

the test laboratory. 

20 
P.39 

Appendix to Study Report (PFLNEU21/010938) 

Sample: Laboratory number: 

Emission 2 104021 

Chromatogram Plot C:\MAGNUM\DATA\184021 Date: 4/12/01 23:51:03 

Comment: PFLNEUZ1 Emission2 3/14/01 Ak TypeG GC/GM Screening 

Scan no: 695 Retention time: 11:35 RIC:23745808 Mass Range: 40 - 28637 

Plotted: 695 to 1920 Range 1 to 1920 100% = 64298751 

1.56% 

Test results apply exclusively to the aforementioned samples. 

The test report may not be reproduced in extract form without the written permission of 

the test laboratory. 

tV? 

21 
P.40 

Appendix to Study Report (PFLNEU21/010938) 

Sample: Laboratorv number: 

Storage tankl 104022 

Chromatogram Plot C:\MAGNUM\DATA\184828 Date: 4/13/01 00:33:31 

Comment: PFLNEUZ1 Storage tankl 3/14/01 Ak TypeG GC/GM Screening 

Scan no: 698 Retention time: 11:31 RIC:17660382 

Mass Range: 40 - 265 

Plotted: 690 to 1919 Range 1 to 1919 100% = 323272580 

1.56% 

Test results apply exclusively to the aforementioned samples. 

The test report may not be reproduced in extract form without the written permission of 

the test laboratory. 

22 
P.41 

Appendix to Study Report (PFLNEU21/010938) 

Sample: Laboratory number: 

Storage tank 2 104023 

Chromatogram Plot C:\MAGNUM\DATA\104023 Date: 4/13/01 01:16:00 

Comment: PFLNEU21 Storage tank2 3/14/01 Ak TypeG GC/GM Screening 

Scan no: 698 Retention time: 11:31 RIC:20564770 Mass Range: 40 - 224 

Plotted: 690 to 1918 Range 1 to 1918 100% = 281668892 

0.78% 

Test results apply exclusively to the aforementioned samples. 

The test report may not be reproduced in extracts without the written permission of the 

test laboratory. 

Iif0 

23 
P.42 

aPFlflDERER 

AKTltNOeSIUJCHAFT 

ZentraleAnalytikHTFA 

ProJeW-Nr.: 179-00 

Laborbericht 

Betreff: NM-lnfrasV\iMurtedinlk;GFK-Mastenprodukiion 

Emission an orflapjgch oebundenom'Kohlenstoff *-: er*tf*n*\ &•*/•* or^eLnictJliA 

MesaungvprfTl6/112000.•'S

 Mature*->v+ ^ Wn i carbo*- J 

Kamlndurchmesser -^ m 0,21 

Abtufttemperatur

 BC 24,1— exk*us+ a".' ^«»"r fttwf t 

relative Feucht© % 28,7 - rc i 0 (.; ^ dampwes- J 

bar.Luftdruck hPa 964 - to•+1***oiA- o.v 1 v S r/u-'e 

Druck in der Abluft hPa 964'ft, l > 0 „ ,-> f U eyj-ieuff4- o i r 

Wesserantell g/m»N >« ' 7.- T Vb 

v6io^*« H Q3Btrieb5>olumen r^wa* 2400 

KvnU**-* v»i»-*«»j Normvolumen, feucht TiVfiwht 2100 

4«.rr,p 

Normvolumen, trocken rn'N,treei»n 2100 

ro idorc l y.S>/u«-»* flf''*W"»< 

ppm mgC/m*N mgStyrol/mV » 

bM.»u1?rop»n V * 

10.49.25 139,5 224,3 243,4 (Hal^std.MW 

11.19.25 76,6 123,2 133,7 Halbetd.MW 

11.49.26 92,4 148,8 181,1 Halbetd.MW 

12.19.25 86,8 139,6 181,4 Helbstd.MW 

12.49.25 102,6 165,0 179,0 Halb»td.MW 

99J6 160,1 173,7 Gesamt-MW 

| 384,8 a Styrol/Stontffl 

t n \r>Vel v-

*K K 

\ 

X 

M( 

E O B

 LLi»« 3 >M«IIN» N V9XSO T QO-^IOH Q 
eo' d 22/. * 92 9 eQ8 

(MV 

l \ 

LL!-'*'53 *>1-«BuuM*aN \/9i:O I OO-VT-OO Q