alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
State of Arkansas Jurisdiction:A RKADE.L fl!-1JA Enact mentDate:16 /21 /8/ Typeoflevy: **--~L~oc~a~I~S~al~e~s~an~d~U~se~T~a~x~---** Ordinance No._3::'8:._-_J./_:.__0_2 __
TaxRate:i..D6Jo Applicability

of Tax: General sales& usetax- Applies toall goods and services taxable under statelaw. Administrative
Cos ts:3%of grosscollections withheld by the statefor administration

of the tax. Credits or Exemptions: Tax subject tosamecredits
& exemptions available under statesales &usetaxlaw Subsequent Amendments and Amendment Purpose: 1.Date: ---------- Amending Ordinance No.----------- Purpose of Amendment: 2. Date: ---------- Amending Ordinance No.----------- Purpose of Amendment: 3. Date: ---------- Amending Ordinance No.----------- Purpose of Amendment: 4. Date:

---------

-Amending Ordinance No.----------- Purpose of Amendment: Isthe taxonaviation fuel distributed for airport related purposes:Yes orNo
) 0 for belief that the taxis grandfathered.

If No, statereason do .5 Jtfd5cQu.t:JJ/**~u851ltltl1'VG**C#-A)tr£ The stateof Arkansas administers local taxesfor all cities and counties

inthis stateand commits that the Arkansas Department

of Finance and Administration will notify the FAA of any subsequent amendments tothis taxthat could affect grandfathered status. nH. The is, Assistant Revenue Commissioner
):2- )J,/ )_5 ' Date• ORDINANCE NO. B-1W2 AN ORDINfu'ICE PROVIDING FOR '1'1-IE LEVY OF A IDCAL SJ!!oES AND -J.&E TAX A'l' THE RATE OF ONE PERCENT

( 1%) ON RECEIPI'S FRm RE'l'I\IL SAlES WI'l'HIIJ TfiE cn'Y OF ARKADELP!fiA, ARKANSAS

: PROVIDING FOR THE REBATE OF TA'\ES IN RXCFS.S OF 'l'WKNTY-FIVE DJLLAHS ($25.00) PAID 'lD 1'HE CI'l"Y ON A SINGLE "'RANSACJ'ION; PROVIDING Ji'OR A SPECIAL ELECTIO"'
ON OCIDBER 27, 1g81; PROVIDING 'fHE EMERGENCY CLAUSE AND FOB OI'HER PURPOSF...S, l'IHEREAS, Tnere is a great need for imnediate imProvements

of munj.cipal services and
a stable source of revenue to finance such vital local services; and WHERFAS, The anticipated city expenditures
for 1982 exceed the 1982 anticipated city revenues
by approximately $200,000,
if normal city services are continued
at the present level, and **~~S,**Act 990 of 1975, as amended, provides for the local option of adortion of a cjty-wide sales and use tax; NOl-l THEREFORE,
BE IT ORDAINED
BY THE CI'l'Y BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OF 'Jl-IE CITY Ol' ARKADFJ:J'HIA, ARKANSAS

: Section
1. Levy of Sales and Use Tax. As authorized
by Act 990 of 1975 of the Acts of Arkansas,
as amended, there is hereby levied

a sales and use tax at the rate of one percent (1%) on the receipts from the sale at retail vii thjrl the City of Arkadelphia, Arkansas,
on all such items which are sub.ject to taxation under the Arlcansas Gross Receipts Tax Act, Act 336 of' J.Qlll of the Acts of ArJ.cansas

**~**as amendect. Section

;'2, Single Transaction Rebate. Taxes in excess of $:.?5.00 pairt to the City on a sinp;le transaction shall be rebated to the purchaser
of the item sub,ject to taxation under .Section

1 hereof. 'Ihe'' C:Lty Clerl< of the City of A.rka-
### §8504. Establishment of quarantine protocols to control the introduction and spread of the brown tree snake

#### (a) Establishment of quarantine protocols

Not later than two years after October 30, 2004, but subject to the memorandum of agreement required by subsection (b) with respect to Guam, the Secretaries shall establish and cause to be operated at Federal expense a system of pre-departure quarantine protocols for cargo and other items being shipped from Guam and any other United States location where the brown tree snake may become established to prevent the introduction or spread of the brown tree snake. The Secretaries shall establish the quarantine protocols system by regulation. Under the quarantine protocols system, Federal quarantine, natural resource, conservation, and law enforcement officers and inspectors may enforce State and territorial laws regarding the transportation, possession, or introduction of any brown tree snake.

#### (b) Cooperation and consultation

The activities of the Secretaries under subsection (a) shall be carried out in cooperation with other Federal agencies and the appropriate State and territorial quarantine, natural resource, conservation, and law enforcement officers. In the case of Guam, as a precondition on the establishment of the system of pre-departure quarantine protocols under such subsection, the Secretaries shall enter into a memorandum of agreement with the Government of Guam to obtain the assistance and cooperation of the Government of Guam in establishing the system of pre-departure quarantine protocols.

#### (c) Implementation

The system of pre-departure quarantine protocols to be established under subsection (a) shall not be implemented until funds are specifically appropriated for that purpose.

#### (d) Authorization of appropriations

There is authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section the following amounts:

(1) To the Secretary of Agriculture, not more than $3,000,000 for each of the fiscal years 2006 through 2010.

(2) To the Secretary of the Interior, not more than $1,000,000 for each of the fiscal years 2006 through 2010.

(Pub. L. 108–384, §5, Oct. 30, 2004, 118 Stat. 2224.)
###### Editorial Note on Part 1553

#### Editorial Note:

Forms referenced in part 1553 do not appear in the Code of Federal Regulations.

#### 1553.000 Scope of part.

This part prescribes Agency forms for use in acquisitions and contains requirements and information generally applicable to the forms.
#### Edward Clohessy et al., Appellants, v. Broadway Maintenance Corp., Respondent.

Order, entered on March 27, 1962, dismissing the cause of action for punitive damages, setting aside the verdict of $180,000 for compensatory damages; setting aside the verdict in favor of Gotham Garage Co., Inc., and Gotham Auto Service Corp., in the amount of $70,000; and ordering a new-trial on the issue of compensatory damages, unanimously modified on the law- and in the exercise of discretion, without costs so as to provide for a new trial on the issues of damages, exclusive of punitive damages, unless the plaintiff Clohessy stipulates to a reduction of the verdict for compensatory damages to the sum of $80,000, in which event the jury verdict for compensatory damages as so reduced and the jury verdict in favor of plaintiffs Gotham Garage Co., Inc., and Gotham Auto Service Corp. against defendant may stand. On this record the award of $380,000 for compensatory damages is excessive and a retrial on that issue is required unless the plaintiff stipulates to a reduction. However, as the record amply supports the finding of liability against the defendant in favor of plaintiff Clohessy, a retrial of that issue need not be had. Nor is a retrial required as to the liability of the defendant to the plaintiffs, Gotham, as such finding' is dearly supported by the record. As to the cause of action for punitive damages there is insufficient evidence in the record to support a finding that the defendant’s conduct was such as to permit the imposition of such damages (see *Powers*v. *Manhattan By. Co.,*120 N. Y. 178). With respect to the claim of the plaintiffs, Gotham, against the defendant — the evidence indicates that the defendant installed the transformer and, pursuant to contract, was under the continuing obligation to both service and maintain the sign. This being so, the defendant is obliged to indemnify those plaintiffs *(Beinhodker*v. *Mames Development Corp.,*296 N. Y. 925). However, a retrial on the quantum of damages based on such liability is required if a retrial is had *702on the quantum of damages due the plaintiff, Clohessy. If, however, the plaintiff, Clohessy, stipulates to the reduction of the verdict in his favor, then in that event — that verdict of necessity establishing the reasonableness of the settlement — the verdict in favor of the plaintiffs Gotham should be reinstated. Settle order on notice. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, Stevens, Stener and Bergan, JJ.
<PAGE>


                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



We hereby consent to the use in the Statement of Additional Information
constituting part of this Post-Effective Amendment No. 32 to the Registration
Statement No. 2-74667 on Form N-4 (the "Registration Statement") of (1) our
report dated February 1, 2000 relating to the financial statements of
Separate Account No. 301 of The Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United
States for the year ended December 31, 1999, and (2) our report dated
February 1, 2000 relating to the consolidated financial statements of The
Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States for the year ended
December 31, 1999, which reports appear in such Statement of Additional
Information, and to the incorporation by reference of our reports into the
Prospectus which constitutes part of this Registration Statement. We also
consent to the reference to us under the headings "Condensed Financial
Information" and "About our independent accountants" in the Prospectus.






/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
------------------------------
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
New York, New York
April 24, 2000
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS, EASTERN DIVISION

Jeff Foster,

Plaintiff,

v.

PNC Bank, National Association,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 2012 cv 3130

Honorable Judge: Mary M. Rowland

AGREED SCHEDULING ORDER UNDER LOCAL RULE 54.3

This matter coming to be heard for status, and the parties having proposed an agreed schedule for 

the various items required under Local Rule 54.3, the Court hereby enters the following amended 

schedule:

Deadline

PNC’s Initial Fee Disclosures L.R. 54.3(d) (1)-(3) 06/29/2020

Foster’s Required Disclosures if no agreement 

reached L.R 54.3(5)

07/29/2020

Parties to specifically identify issues that will and 

will not be objected to L.R. 54.3 (5)

08/12/2020

Joint Statement on Disputed Issues L.R. 54.3 (e) 08/26/2020

Fee Motion 09/11/2020

The schedule may be modified by order allowing Motion for Instructions L.R. 54.3, or by order 

of the Court for good cause shown.

Dated: June 1, 2020 ENTER:

Prepared by: ________________________________

PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, 

Defendant

By: /s/ James M. Crowley

One of its attorneys

James M. Crowley, Esq. (ARDC 6182597)

Plunkett Cooney, P.C.

221 N. LaSalle Street, Suite 1550

Chicago, IL 60601

(312) 670-6900

jcrowley@crowleylamb.com

JEFF FOSTER, Plaintiff

By: /s/ Max A. Stein

One of his attorneys

Max A. Stein (ARDC No. 6275993)

Lauren E. Dreifus (ARDC No. 6317983)

Boodell & Domanskis, LLC

1 North Franklin Street, Suite 1200

Chicago, Illinois 60606

(312) 938-4070 (tel.); (312) 540-1162 (fax)

mstein@boodlaw.com

ldreifus@boodlaw.com

Case: 1:12-cv-03130 Document #: 206 Filed: 06/01/20 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:4214
{00573590 } 2

Marcel C. Duhamel, Esq. (Ohio Bar No. 0062171 pro hac vice)

Lindsay Doss Spillman, Esq. (Ohio Bar No. 0086849 pro hac vice)

Vorys Sater, Seymour and Pease LLP

200 Public Square, Suite 1400

Cleveland, OH 44114

(216) 479-6100

mcduhamel@vorys.com

ldspillman@vorys.com

Case: 1:12-cv-03130 Document #: 206 Filed: 06/01/20 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:4215
#### 1852.223-71 Authorization for Radio Frequency Use.

As prescribed in 1823.7101, insert the following clause:

# Authorization for Radio Frequency Use (APR 2015)

(a) The contractor or subcontractor shall obtain equipment authorization of use of radio frequencies required in support of this contract following the procedures in NPR 2570.1, NASA Radio Frequency (RF) Spectrum Management Manual.

(b) For any experimental, developmental, or operational equipment for which the appropriate equipment frequency authorization has not been made, the Contractor or subcontractor shall provide the technical and operating characteristics of the proposed electromagnetic radiating device to the NASA Center Facility Spectrum Manager during the initial planning, experimental, or developmental phase of contractual performance.

(c) This clause, including this paragraph (c), shall be included in all subcontracts that call for developing, producing, testing, or operating a device for which a radio frequency authorization is required.

(End of clause)

[80 FR 12947, Mar. 12, 2015, as amended at 80 FR 50212, Aug. 19, 2015]
Case: 1:11-cv-07923 Document #: 106-1 Filed: 03/03/16 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:1630
Case: 1:11-cv-07923 Document #: 106-1 Filed: 03/03/16 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:1631
Case: 1:11-cv-07923 Document #: 106-1 Filed: 03/03/16 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:1632
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES

400 MARYLAND AVE. S.W., WASHINGTON, DC 20202-2600

www.ed.gov

The Department of Education’s mission is to promote student achievement and preparation for global competitiveness

by fostering educational excellence and ensuring equal access.

September 29, 2020 

Honorable Ann Lebo 

Director 

Iowa Department of Education 

Grimes State Office Building 

400 East 14th Street 

Des Moines, Iowa 50319

carol.mcmains@iowa.gov

Dear Director Lebo:

This letter grants final approval under Section 421(b) of the General Education Provisions Act 

for grant award H181A180006. 

The Department received your September 15, 2020 request on behalf of the State of Iowa for a 

waiver extending the period of availability for Federal fiscal year (FFY) 2018 Individuals with 

Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) Part C grant award funds. 

With this approval, the FFY 2018 IDEA Part C grant award funds will be available for obligation 

through September 30, 2021 and may be liquidated through December 30, 2021. 

Please contact your Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP) State lead, Kimberly Mitchell 

at Kimberly.Mitchell@ed.gov, if you have any questions. 

Sincerely,

/s/

Mark Schultz 

Commissioner, Rehabilitation Services Administration

Delegated the authority to perform the functions and duties of the 

Assistant Secretary for the Office of Special Education and 

Rehabilitative Services

cc: Part C Coordinator
EXHIBIT
        32.2
  **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO**
 **19
        U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
  In
        connection with the Annual Report of Statmon Technologies Corp. (the "Company")
        on Form 10-KSB for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities
        and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Geoffrey P.
        Talbot, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§
        1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the
        best of my knowledge:
  (1)  The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2)  The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  Date: July
                14, 2005
              By:
              /s/ Geoffrey
                P. Talbot**Geoffrey
                P. Talbot****Chief
                Financial Officer**
 
 A
        signed
        original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
        authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
        in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
        by Section 906, has been provided to Statmon Technologies Corp. and will
        be
        retained by Statmon Technologies Corp. and furnished to the Securities and
        Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
1 This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please

2 see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. 

3 Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated

4 errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does

5 not include the filing date. 

6 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

7 PEARL SALAZAR,

8 Worker-Appellee,

9 v. NO. 29,631 

10 LAS VEGAS MEDICAL CENTER

11 and STATE OF NEW MEXICO

12 RISK MANAGEMENT,

13 Employer/Insurer-Appellants.

14 APPEAL FROM NEW MEXICO WORKERS’ COMPENSATION

15 ADMINISTRATION

16 Gregory D. Griego , Workers’ Compensation Judge

17 James Rawley

18 Albuquerque, NM

19 for Appellee

20 Law Office of Hatcher & Tebo. P.A.

21 Scott P. Hatcher

22 Christopher J. Tebo

23 Santa Fe, NM

24 for Appellants
2

1 MEMORANDUM OPINION

2 WECHSLER, Judge.

3 Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of

4 proposed disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed,

5 and the time for doing so has expired.

6 Affirmed.

7 IT IS SO ORDERED.

8 ______________________________

9 JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge 

10

11 WE CONCUR:

12 _______________________________

13 CYNTHIA A. FRY, Chief Judge

14 _______________________________

15 LINDA M. VANZI, Judge
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000318852
<NAME>                        COLORADO WYOMING RESERVE COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER>                  1
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,593
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                19,279
<PP&E>                                         731,355
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 744,251
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          277,124
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        24,677
<OTHER-SE>                                     492,450
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   744,251
<SALES>                                         32,798
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                68,269
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,484,728
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,416,459)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,416,459)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,416,459)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.73)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.73)
        


</TABLE>
Case: 1:12-cv-03107 Document #: 47-1 Filed: 06/08/12 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:1384
Case: 1:12-cv-03107 Document #: 47-1 Filed: 06/08/12 Page 2 of 5 PageID #:1385
Case: 1:12-cv-03107 Document #: 47-1 Filed: 06/08/12 Page 3 of 5 PageID #:1386
Case: 1:12-cv-03107 Document #: 47-1 Filed: 06/08/12 Page 4 of 5 PageID #:1387
Case: 1:12-cv-03107 Document #: 47-1 Filed: 06/08/12 Page 5 of 5 PageID #:1388
#### Bertha F. Bangs, Appellant, v. Arthur Malian et al., Defendants, and Abraham Streifer, Respondent. Bertha F. Bangs, Appellant, v. Edward DeGroff, Jr., et al., Defendants, and Abraham Streifer, Respondent.

Order modified to permit plaintiff to replead and as thus modified, affirmed, without costs. Bergan, P. J., Coon, Gibson, Herlihy and Taylor, JJ., concur.
#### In the Matter of Gem Credit Corporation, Respondent, v. Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Appellant.

Motion by petitioner-respondent to dismiss appeal denied. Beldock, Acting P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Pette, JJ., concur.
Case: 1:12-cv-01920 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/16/12 Page 1 of 25 PageID #:1

Case: 1:12-cv-01920 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/16/12 Page 2 of 25 PageID #:2

Case: 1:12-cv-01920 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/16/12 Page 3 of 25 PageID #:3

Case: 1:12-cv-01920 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/16/12 Page 4 of 25 PageID #:4

Case: 1:12-cv-01920 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/16/12 Page 5 of 25 PageID #:5

Case: 1:12-cv-01920 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/16/12 Page 6 of 25 PageID #:6

Case: 1:12-cv-01920 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/16/12 Page 7 of 25 PageID #:7

Case: 1:12-cv-01920 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/16/12 Page 8 of 25 PageID #:8

Case: 1:12-cv-01920 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/16/12 Page 9 of 25 PageID #:9

Case: 1:12-cv-01920 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/16/12 Page 10 of 25 PageID #:10

Case: 1:12-cv-01920 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/16/12 Page 11 of 25 PageID #:11

Case: 1:12-cv-01920 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/16/12 Page 12 of 25 PageID #:12

Case: 1:12-cv-01920 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/16/12 Page 13 of 25 PageID #:13

Case: 1:12-cv-01920 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/16/12 Page 14 of 25 PageID #:14

Case: 1:12-cv-01920 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/16/12 Page 15 of 25 PageID #:15

Case: 1:12-cv-01920 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/16/12 Page 16 of 25 PageID #:16

Case: 1:12-cv-01920 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/16/12 Page 17 of 25 PageID #:17

Case: 1:12-cv-01920 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/16/12 Page 18 of 25 PageID #:18

Case: 1:12-cv-01920 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/16/12 Page 19 of 25 PageID #:19

Case: 1:12-cv-01920 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/16/12 Page 20 of 25 PageID #:20

Case: 1:12-cv-01920 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/16/12 Page 21 of 25 PageID #:21

Case: 1:12-cv-01920 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/16/12 Page 22 of 25 PageID #:22

Case: 1:12-cv-01920 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/16/12 Page 23 of 25 PageID #:23

Case: 1:12-cv-01920 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/16/12 Page 24 of 25 PageID #:24

Case: 1:12-cv-01920 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/16/12 Page 25 of 25 PageID #:25
#### In the Matter of Sarah Fenster, as Administratrix of the Estate of Harry Fenster, Deceased, Respondent, v. City of New York et al., Appellants.

— Order, entered on August 11, 1961, unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondent. No opinion. Concur—Breitel, J. P., Valente, Stevens, Eager and Steuer, JJ.
AO 450 (Rev. 01/09) Judgment in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

Northern District of Illinois

Thomas Lauria )

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff

v. Civil Action No. 12 C 772

Biosante Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al

Defendant

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION

The court has ordered that (check one):

the plaintiff (name) recover from the

defendant (name) the amount of

dollars ($ ), which includes prejudgment

interest at the rate of %, plus postjudgment interest at the rate of %, along with costs.

the plaintiff recover nothing, the action be dismissed on the merits, and the defendant (name)

recover costs from the plaintiff (name)

X other:

It is hereby ordered that Defendants, BioSante Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and Stephen M. Simes.

motion to dismiss the consolidated class action complaint is entered in their favor and against Plaintiff,

Thomas Lauria. 

This action was (check one):

tried by a jury with Judge presiding, and the jury has

rendered a verdict.

tried by Judge without a jury and the above decision

was reached.

X decided by Judge Joan B. Gottschall on a motion to dismiss

. 

Date: Oct 23, 2013 Thomas G. Bruton, Clerk of Court

/s RHONDA JOHNSON

Case: 1:12-cv-00772 Document #: 112 Filed: 10/23/13 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:1118