alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Form 10-QSB of Reliability Incorporated (the Issuer) for the quarterly period ended
June 30, 2007 (the Periodic Report):



| | 1. | Fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Larry Edwards      
|Larry Edwards          
|Chief Executive Officer
|November 23, 2007
# Europos Sąjungos C 345/2015

| | ISSN 1977-0960 |
| --- | --- |
| Europos Sąjungos
  oficialusis leidinys | C 345 |
| | |
| Leidimas lietuvių kalba | Informacija ir pranešimai | 58 tomas2015m. spalio 18d. |

ISSN 1977-0960

Europos Sąjungos

oficialusis leidinys

C 345

Leidimas lietuvių kalba

Informacija ir pranešimai

58 tomas2015m. spalio 18d.

---

| Pranešimo Nr. | Turinys | Puslapis |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Pranešimai |
| | EUROPOS SĄJUNGOS INSTITUCIJŲ, ĮSTAIGŲ IR ORGANŲ PRANEŠIMAI |
| | Taryba |
| 2015/C 345/01 | Tarybos pareiškimas | 1 |

Pranešimo Nr.

Turinys

Puslapis

IV   Pranešimai

EUROPOS SĄJUNGOS INSTITUCIJŲ, ĮSTAIGŲ IR ORGANŲ PRANEŠIMAI

Taryba

2015/C 345/01

Tarybos pareiškimas

1

---

| LT | |
| --- | --- |

LT

---

IV Pranešimai

EUROPOS SĄJUNGOS INSTITUCIJŲ, ĮSTAIGŲ IR ORGANŲ PRANEŠIMAI

Taryba

| 18.10.2015 | LT | Europos Sąjungos oficialusis leidinys | C 345/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.10.2015

LT

Europos Sąjungos oficialusis leidinys

C 345/1

---

TARYBOS PAREIŠKIMAS

(2015/C 345/01)

Taryba pažymi, kad įsipareigojimu panaikinti visas su branduoliniu klausimu susijusias ES sankcijas pagal Bendrą visapusišką veiksmų planą (BVVP) nedaromas poveikis BVVP nustatytam ginčų sprendimo mechanizmui ir galimybei vėl nustatyti ES sankcijas tuo atveju, jei Iranas svarbiu aspektu nesilaikytų savo įsipareigojimų pagal BVVP.

Taryba įsipareigoja nedelsdama vėl nustatyti visas su branduoliniu klausimu susijusias ES sankcijas, kurių taikymas buvo sustabdytas ir (arba) nutrauktas, jei Iranas svarbiu aspektu nesilaikytų savo įsipareigojimų pagal BVVP, Europos Sąjungos vyriausiajam įgaliotiniui užsienio reikalams ir saugumo politikai, Prancūzijai, Vokietijai ir Jungtinei Karalystei tuo tikslu pateikus bendrą rekomendaciją Tarybai.

---
# Dziennik Urzędowy C 345/2015

| | ISSN 1977-1002 |
| --- | --- |
| Dziennik Urzędowy
  Unii Europejskiej | C 345 |
| | |
| Wydanie polskie | Informacje i zawiadomienia | Tom 5818 października 2015 |

ISSN 1977-1002

Dziennik Urzędowy

Unii Europejskiej

C 345

Wydanie polskie

Informacje i zawiadomienia

Tom 5818 października 2015

---

| Powiadomienie nr | Spis treśći | Strona |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Informacje |
| | INFORMACJE INSTYTUCJI, ORGANÓW I JEDNOSTEK ORGANIZACYJNYCH UNII EUROPEJSKIEJ |
| | Rada |
| 2015/C 345/01 | Oświadczenie Rady | 1 |

Powiadomienie nr

Spis treśći

Strona

IV   Informacje

INFORMACJE INSTYTUCJI, ORGANÓW I JEDNOSTEK ORGANIZACYJNYCH UNII EUROPEJSKIEJ

Rada

2015/C 345/01

Oświadczenie Rady

1

---

| PL | |
| --- | --- |

PL

---

IV Informacje

INFORMACJE INSTYTUCJI, ORGANÓW I JEDNOSTEK ORGANIZACYJNYCH UNII EUROPEJSKIEJ

Rada

| 18.10.2015 | PL | Dziennik Urzędowy Unii Europejskiej | C 345/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.10.2015

PL

Dziennik Urzędowy Unii Europejskiej

C 345/1

---

OŚWIADCZENIE RADY

(2015/C 345/01)

Rada odnotowuje, że zobowiązanie do zniesienia wszystkich sankcji UE związanych z kwestiami jądrowymi zgodnie ze wspólnym kompleksowym planem działania (JCPOA) pozostaje bez uszczerbku dla mechanizmu rozstrzygania sporów określonego w JCPOA oraz dla ponownego wprowadzenia sankcji UE w przypadku istotnego niewykonania przez Iran jego zobowiązań w ramach JCPOA.

Rada zobowiązuje się do bezzwłocznego ponownego wprowadzenia wszystkich związanych z kwestiami jądrowymi sankcji UE, które zostały zawieszone lub przestały obowiązywać, w przypadku istotnego niewykonania przez Iran jego zobowiązań w ramach JCPOA, po skierowaniu do Rady wspólnego zalecenia przez: Wysokiego Przedstawiciela Unii Europejskiej do Spraw Zagranicznych i Polityki Bezpieczeństwa, Francję, Niemcy i Zjednoczone Królestwo.

---
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

The Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP) is responsible for ensuring states' compliance with the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). IDEA guarantees the free appropriate public education (FAPE) of children with disabilities in the least restrictive environment (LRE). To accomplish this task, OSEP has developed the Results Driven Accountability (RDA) system. RDA consists of the following:

### Grants

                  - State Formula Grants                      - Significant Disproportionality Reporting 
                  - IDEA American Rescue Plan 

### Reports

                  - State Performance Plan (SPP) and Annual Performance Reports (APR)

### Monitoring

                  - Differentiated Monitoring and Support (DMS)

### State Maintenance of Financial Support (SMFS) Waivers

                  - Part B SMFS Waivers

### Period of Availability (POA) Waivers

                  - Part B POA Waivers
                  - Part C POA Waivers

### Contacts

                  - OSEP/ MSIP  (Monitoring and State Improvement Planning Division)  State Contacts

----

 

 Printable view

## How Do I Find...

          - Student loans, forgiveness
          - Higher Education Rulemaking
          - College accreditation
          - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
          - FERPA
          - FAFSA
          - 1098, tax forms

More >

## Information About...

          - Elevating Teaching
          - Early Learning
          - Engage Every Student
          - Unlocking Career Success
          - Cybersecurity

 

----

*Our mission*

Student Loans
Repaying LoansDefaulted LoansLoan ForgivenessLoan Servicers

Grants & Programs
Apply for Pell GrantsGrants ForecastApply for a Grant

Laws & Guidance
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)FERPACivil RightsNew IDEA Website

Data & Research
Education StatisticsPostsecondary Education DataED Data ExpressNation's Report CardWhat Works ClearinghouseOpen Data PlatformCOVID Relief Data

About Us
Contact UsED OfficesJobsPress ReleasesFAQsRecursos en españolBudget, PerformancePrivacy Program

----

          - Notices
          - FOIA
          - Privacy Policy
          - Accessibility
          - Security
          - Information quality
          - Inspector General
          - Whitehouse.gov
          - USA.gov
          - Benefits.gov
          - Regulations.gov
          - vote.gov
#### In the Matter of the Arbitration between Central Soya Company, Inc., Respondent, and Dana Kilbury, Doing Business as Kilbury’s Feed Service, Appellant.

Order unanimously affirmed, with costs (see Matter of *Level Export Corp. [Wolz, Aiken & Co.]*305 NY 82). (Appeal from order of Steuben Sixoreme Court-stay arbitration.) Present-Moule, J. P., Cardamone, Simons, Hancock, Jr., and Witmer, JJ.
19.1503 Status. ( a ) Status as an EDWOSB concern or WOSB concern eligible under the WOSB Program is determined by the Small Business Administration in accordance with 13 CFR part 127.
( b ) For a WOSB that seeks a WOSB or EDWOSB set-aside or sole-source contract, the contracting officer shall verify that the offeror— ( 1 ) Is registered in the System for Award Management (SAM); and
( 2 ) Is designated as a certified EDWOSB or WOSB concern in SAM (see 19.1505(d) for set aside procedures). Pending applications for certification are only in the Dynamic Small Business Search (DSBS) at *https://web.sba.gov/pro-net/search/dsp_dsbs.cfm .*
( c ) If there is a decision issued by SBA as a result of a current eligibility examination finding that the concern did not qualify as an EDWOSB concern or WOSB concern eligible under the WOSB Program, the contracting officer may terminate the contract, and shall not exercise any option, or award further task or delivery orders. Agencies shall not count or include the award toward the small business goals for an EDWOSB concern or WOSB concern eligible under the WOSB Program and must update FPDS from the date of award to reflect the final SBA decision.
( d ) A joint venture may be considered an EDWOSB concern or WOSB concern eligible under the WOSB Program if the EDWOSB or WOSB participant is certified in SAM (see section 19.1505(d) for set-aside procedures) and the joint venture meets the requirements of 13 CFR 127.506.
[87 FR 58241, Sept. 23, 2022]
##### 



Page 22 of 22  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company and its
subsidiaries.
 /s/ Michael H. GoldbergMichael H. GoldbergPresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)May 4, 2007/s/ Lawrence A. BoikLawrence A. BoikVice President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)May 4, 2007
A05A1066.

#### HIGHTOWER v. THE STATE.

(619 SE2d 387)

Phipps, Judge.

A jury found Damon Terad Hightower guilty of burglary, aggravated assault, possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, and possession of a firearm during the commission of the crime of aggravated assault. Appealing his convictions of these crimes, he contends that the state improperly placed his character in issue by eliciting *876testimony that he had not paid child support. Hightower has failed to demonstrate reversible error. Thus, we affirm.

Decided August 3, 2005.

*James W. Bradley,*for appellant.

*Robert E. Keller, District Attorney, Anece Baxter White, Assistant District Attorney,*for appellee.

The state’s evidence showed that on April 10, 2004, Hightower broke into his former girlfriend’s home, where their children also lived, and threatened her with a gun. Hightower testified that he had gone to his former girlfriend’s home to get their children at her request, that he had knocked on the door, and that one of their sons had opened it for him. Hightower recounted that an argument had ensued, but denied having had a gun.

On appeal, Hightower complains about the following exchange that occurred during his cross-examination: “Q. And during that time period she was talking [sic] care of those kids on her own. You weren’t giving her child support or anything like that, right? A. No. We was both doing — we was doing it the same. It was equal.” In addition, Hightower complains about the following exchange that occurred during rebuttal testimony of his former girlfriend: “Q. And was he paying child support and helping take care of his kids as far as monetary-wise? A. No, ma’am. He did for the kids, but child support, no, he didn’t.” The record shows that defense counsel made no objection when the state elicited this testimony. Consequently, there is nothing for us to review.1

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Andrews, P. J., and Mikell, J., concur.*

1

 See *Hehir v. State,*237 Ga. App. 389 (515 SE2d 406) (1999).
Exhibit 12
                         E'TOWN CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
                    Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
                               (In Thousands Except Ratios)


                                            Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended
                                                 September 30,   September 30,
                                                 1999    1998     1999     1998
EARNINGS:

Net income                                     $ 7,953 $ 8,555  $20,010 $17,880
Federal income taxes                             4,348   4,673   10,968   9,822
Interest charges                                 4,803   4,513   13,920  13,047
                                               ---------------------------------
 Earnings available to cover fixed charges      17,104  17,741   44,898  40,749
                                               ---------------------------------

FIXED CHARGES:
Interest on long-term debt                       3,884   4,049   12,090  12,082
Other interest                                     901     538    1,757   1,038
Amortization of debt discount - net                111     107      331     324
                                               ---------------------------------
Total fixed charges                            $ 4,896 $ 4,694  $14,178 $13,444
                                               ---------------------------------

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges                3.49    3.78     3.17    3.03
                                               =================================


Earnings to Fixed Charges represents the sum of Net Income,
Dividends, Federal income taxes and Interest Charges (which is reduced by
Allowance for Debt Funds Used During Construction), divided by Fixed Charges.
Fixed Charges consist of interest on long and short-term debt (which is not
reduced by Allowance for Debt Funds Used During Construction), and
Amortization of debt discount.
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.2
                      18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION


I hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and
belief, that the accompanying Form 10-KSB/A of Spectrum Laboratories, Inc., (the
"Company") for the annual period ended December 25, 2004 fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d); and that the information contained in this Form
10-KSB/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

Dated: September 19, 2005



/s/ Brian A. Watts
---------------------------
Brian A. Watts
Chief Financial Officer
Spectrum Laboratories, Inc.
##### 



Exhibit 12.1 The following table sets forth our historical ratios of earnings to fixed
charges for the periods indicated: Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
(in thousands) Years Ended2000
    
    
    2001
    
    
    2002
    
    
    2003
    
    
    2004Pre-tax income (loss) from
continuing
operations
    
    $
    74.1
    
    
    $
    (563.3
    ) (1)
    
    $
    (258.4
    )
    
    $
    104.0
    
    
    $
    (182.0
    )Fixed charges:Interest expense
    
    
    13.7
    
    
    
    25.2
    
    
    
    27.0
    
    
    
    30.6
    
    
    
    32.4Interest included
in rental payments (2)
    
    
    4.2
    
    
    
    8.3
    
    
    
    7.7
    
    
    
    9.4
    
    
    
    9.6Total fixed charges
    
    $
    17.9
    
    
    $
    33.5
    
    
    $
    34.7
    
    
    $
    40.0
    
    
    $
    42.0Pre-tax income (loss)
from continuing
operations plus
fixed charges
    
    $
    92.0
    
    
    $
    (530.1
    )
    
    $
    (223.7
    )
    
    $
    144.0
    
    
    $
    (140.0
    )Ratio of earnings to
fixed charges
    
    
    5.1
    
    
    
    
    (3)
    
    
    
    (4)
    
    
    3.6
    
    
    
    (
    ) (5)
   (1)
    
    The pre-tax loss from continuing operations in
2001 reflects a restatement as disclosed in the Companys Form
10K/A filed February 22, 2005.(2)
    
    Represents appropriate portion (1/3) of rentals.(3)
    
    Due to the Companys loss in 2001, the ratio coverage was less than 1:1.
The Company must generate additional earnings of $563.6 million to achieve
a coverage of 1:1.(4)
    
    Due to the Companys loss in 2002, the ratio coverage was less than 1:1.
The Company must generate additional earnings of $258.4 million to achieve
a coverage of 1:1.(5)
    
    Due to the Companys loss in 2004, the ratio coverage was less than 1:1.
The Company must generate additional earnings of $182.0 million to achieve
a coverage of 1:1.
#### 206.305 Availability of the justification.

See PGI 206.305 for further guidance on the requirements for preparing, obtaining approval, and posting justification and approval documents for contracts awarded using the authority of FAR 6.302-2.

[80 FR 67255, Oct. 30, 2015]
**State
      of North Carolina**


**Department
      of the Secretary of State**





**ARTICLES
      OF AMENDMENT**


**PROGRESS
      ENERGY, INC.**





Pursuant
      to § 55-10-06
      of the General Statutes of North Carolina, the undersigned corporation hereby
      submits the following Articles of Amendment for the purpose of amending its
      Articles of Incorporation.





1.
            The
                name of the corporation is Progress Energy,
                Inc.





2.
            The
                text of each amendment adopted is as
                follows:





Article
      5
      of the Articles of Incorporation shall be amended by adding a new Section 4
      to
      read as follows:





“4.  Election.  Except
      as
      provided in Section 3 of this Article, each director shall be elected by a
      vote
      of the majority of the votes cast with respect to the director at any meeting
      for the election of directors at which a quorum is present, provided that if
      the
      number of nominees exceeds the number of directors to be elected, the directors
      shall be elected by a vote of the plurality of the shares represented in person
      or by proxy at any such meeting and entitled to vote on the election of
      directors. For purposes of this Section, a majority of the votes cast means
      that
      the number of shares voted “for” a director must exceed the number of votes cast
“against” that director.”







3.
            The
                date of adoption of the amendment was May 10,
                2006





4.
            The
                amendment was approved by shareholder action, and such shareholder
                approval was obtained as required by Chapter 55 of the General Statutes
                of
                North Carolina.





5.
            These
                articles will be effective upon
                filing.





This
      the
      10th day of May, 2006




PROGRESS
      ENERGY,
      INC.






By: /s/
      William D. Johnson


Name
      William D.
      Johnson


Title
      President and
      Chief Operating Officer
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-93,973-02

EX P ARTE JULIO DOMINGU EZ, Applicant

ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. C-396-W012164- 1338175-B IN THE 396T H DISTRICT COURT F ROM TARRA NT COUNTY

Per curiam . O R D E R Applicant pleade d g uilty to prohibited substance in a corr ectional fac ility and was sentenc ed to fiftee n y ear s’ imprisonment. Applicant did not appea l his convic t i o n . Ap plicant filed this application for a writ of habea s corpus in the county of conviction, and the district cler k forwa rded it to thi s Court. See T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 11.07. Applicant alleg es that h i s s en t ence in this case is illega l. Specifica lly , he alleg es that the punishment rang e in this case was improperly enhanc ed un d er T E X . P E N A L C O D E § 12.42(d). Applicant has alleg ed fac ts that, if true, might entitle him to relief

. Samaripas v. State , 454 S.W .3d 1 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014). Acc ording ly , the rec ord should be develo p ed. The trial court is the appropr iate forum for finding s of fac t. I n developing the rec ord, the trial court may use any meansset out in T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 11.07 § 3(d)

.

I t appea rs that Applicant is repr esente d by counsel. I f the trial court elec ts to hold a hear ing, it shall deter

mine if Applicant is repr esente d by counsel, and if not, whether Applicant is indige nt. I f Applicant is indige nt and wants to be repr esente d by counsel, the trial court shall appoint counsel to r epre sent him a t the hear ing. See T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 26.04. I f counsel is a ppointed or reta ined, the trial c ourt shall immediately notify this Court of counsel’s name

. The trial court shall make finding s of fac t and conclusions of law reg arding whether the enhanc ement wa s improper unde r Samaripas . The trial court shall also make findings of fac t and conclusions of law reg arding whether Applicant had any other prior felony convictions that could have been used by the State for enhanc ement purposes in this case . See E x parte Parrott , 396 S.W .3d 531 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013). The trial court shall also make any other finding s of fac t and conclusions of law that it deems rele vant and appropr iate to the dispositi on of Applicant’s claim for habea s corpus re lief. The trial court shall make findings of fac t an d conclusions of law withi n ninety day s from the date of this order

. The district cler k shall then immediately forwa rd to this Court the trial court’s finding s and conclusions and the rec ord develope d on rema nd, including, among other things, aff idavits, motions, objections, proposed finding s and conclusions, order s, and transcr ipts from hear ings and depositions. See T E X . R. A P P . P. 73.4(b)( 4). Any extensions of time must be reque sted by the trial cour

t and obtained f

rom this Court.

Filed: Aug ust 24, 2022 Do not publish