alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-16-00401-CR

ANTHONY DAVID GALVAN APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

----------

FROM THE 297TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

TRIAL COURT NO. 1439828D

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

----------

We have considered “Appellant’s Motion to Dismiss Appeal.” The motion 

complies with rule 42.2(a) of the rules of appellate procedure. Tex. R. App. P.

42.2(a). No decision of this court having been delivered before we received this 

motion, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P.

42.2(a), 43.2(f). 

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
2

Because the appellant simultaneously filed “Appellant’s Motion to Expedite 

Mandate (Unopposed)” in this appeal, we grant the motion and direct the clerk of 

this court to issue mandate within three days of the date this opinion issues. See

Tex. R. App. P. 18.1(c). 

PER CURIAM

PANEL: WALKER, MEIER, and GABRIEL, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: August 3, 2017
Exhibit 32(a)








CERTIFICATION FURNISHED PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Progress Energy, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, William D. Johnson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)           the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)           the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.











/s/ William D. Johnson


William D. Johnson


Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer


August 6, 2010








This certification is being furnished and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
NOT VALID UNLESS COUNTERSIGNED BY TRANSFER AGENT
              INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE


                                                           CUSIP NO. 741586 10 5

- NUMBER -                                                        - SHARES -

                            PRIMEHOLDINGS.COM, INC.
        AUTHORIZED COMMON STOCK: 50,000,000 SHARES * PAR VALUE of $0.666


THIS CERTIFIES THAT



IS THE RECORD HOLDER OF



                 Shares of PRIMEHOLDINGS.COM, INC Common Stock

transferable  on the  books of the  Corporation  in  person  or duly  authorized
attorney upon surrender of this Certificate properly endorsed.  This Certificate
is not valid unless  countersigned  by the Transfer  Agent and registered by the
Registrar.

         WITNESS  the  facsimile  seal  of the  Corporation  and  the  facsimile
signatures of its duly authorized officers.

Dated:


                            [COMPANY SEAL]

-----------------------                         ------------------------------
Secretary                                       President
#### In the Matter of John Ravalli, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated, Appellant, v County of Nassau, Respondent.

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, commenced by petitioner on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, to review a determination of the Sheriff of Nassau County that correctional center cooks and bakers were not peace officers, petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated May 16, 1978, which dismissed the petition. Judgment affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. Petitioner, on behalf of the cooks and bakers of the Nassau County Correctional Center, brought a CPLR article 78 proceeding against Nassau County to review a determination by the Sheriff of the county, that cooks and bakers are not peace officers within the meaning of CPL 1.20 (subd 33, par [h]). Petitioner failed to name in the proceeding, as a necessary party, the Sheriff of Nassau County. Moreover, the questions raised herein are more properly the subject for a declaratory judgment action. Nevertheless, this court has addressed itself to the substantive issues presented, and we find petitioner’s contentions to be devoid of merit. Mollen, P. J., Suozzi, Rabin and Martuscello, JJ., concur.
#### Dunn *et al. v.*Evans *et al.*

Atkinson, J.

1. In an action to set aside an alleged deed, on the ground that the grantor at the time of executing the instrument was without sufficient mental capacity to make a deed, and on the further ground that the grantor was induced to execute the instrument by fraud and undue influence, it was not error, while instructing the jury on the subject of mental capacity to make a deed, for the court to charge: *(a)*“I charge you that it does not require a high degree of mental power to make a deed. One who has sufficient mental ability to comprehend what he or she is doing, and to understand the nature of the act, and the consequences of the act, has the capacity to make a deed.” (Z>) “If you believe Mrs. Patillo had mental capacity sufficient to comprehend what she was doing, and to understand the nature of her act, and the consequences of her act, then, gentlemen, I charge you to And that she was a sane person and was capable of making the deed, and on that issue find against the plaintiffs.” *DeNieff*v. *Howell,*138 *Ga.*248 (75 S. E. 202). Other portions of the charge, unexceptedj to, dealt with the subject of fraud and undue influence.

2. The deed was executed by a mother in favor of her daughter, and contained no recital as to consideration other than “this is a deed of gift.” Under such circumstances it was not error to charge: “I charge you, gentlemen of the jury, that you can not set aside this deed for want of consideration; for a deed of gift from the mother to the daughter would he based upon a good consideration, and the deed would be good whether *742there was any money consideration or not; provided you believe that she had the capacity, to make the alleged deed and that it was her free and voluntary act.”

April 18, 1913.

Equitable petition. Before Judge Daniel. Henry superior court. July 13, 1912.

*Brown & Brown*and *Napier, Wright & Gox,*for plaintiffs.

*B. M. Smith*and *B. J. Reagan,*for defendants.

3. A ground of a motion for new trial, complaining of a ruling of the judge in admitting testimony in evidence, is insufficient which fails to set forth the objection urged thereto and to show that it was made at the time the evidence was offered. *Hill*v. *Chastain,*138 *Ga.*750 (75 S. E. 1130). Relative to some of the testimony set forth in the eighth amended ground of the motion for new trial, there was a statement that it was objected to at the time it was offered, on the ground that it stated the substance of conversations and transactions with deceased persons; but so much of the evidence as was so objected to ’ was not of the character complained of. Relative to the remainder of' the testimony set forth in the eighth amended ground, and all of the testimony set forth in the seventh and ninth grounds, there was no statement as to what ground of objection was urged to it.

*4.*The evidence was sufficient to support the verdict, and the discretion of the trial judge in refusing a new trial will not be disturbed.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
U.S. Dept Commerce/NOAA/NMFS/NWFSC/PublicationsFigure 1. Location of sampling sites in Alaska
Exhibit 10.40.4



 






Exhibit 10.40.4




AMENDMENT TO

FEDERATED DEPARTMENT STORES, INC.

PROFIT SHARING 401(k) INVESTMENT PLAN




     The Federated Department Stores, Inc. Profit Sharing 401(k) Investment Plan (the “Plan”), is
hereby amended, effective as of April 1, 1997 and solely to correct inadvertent
scrivener’s errors made in a Plan provision and clarify the intended meaning of such provision, by
amending Section 6B.1.6 of the Plan in its entirety to read as follows:




     6B.1.6 Whenever a Participant makes an election (or is deemed to make an
election) under the foregoing provisions of this Section 6B.1 as to the investment
of his or her future Savings and Rollover Contributions or the then balance of his
or her Accounts, then his or her future Savings and Rollover Contributions or the
then balance of his or her Accounts, as the case may be, shall continue to be
invested in accordance with such election until the Participant subsequently elects
a change as to such investment under the foregoing provisions of this Section 6B.1.



     IN ORDER TO EFFECT THE FOREGOING PLAN CHANGE, Federated Department Stores, Inc., the Plan
sponsor, has caused its name to be subscribed to this Plan amendment this 30th day of
December, 2003.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	FEDERATED DEPARTMENT STORES, INC.
	 
	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	By:
	/s/ David W. Clark
	 

	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	Title:
	 	SVP Human Resources
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-15-0000957

28-MAR-2016

08:31 AM
#### Houston *et al. v.*Chattahoochee Lumber Company.

December 12, 1912.

Petition for injunction. Before Judge Frank Park. Decatur superior court. September 18, 1912.

T7. I. *Geer,*for plaintiffs. *Bush & Stapleton,*for defen'dant.

Atkinson, J.

1. A provision in a lease of timber: “should the parties of the second part, their successors, heirs, or assigns, desire a continuance of this lease for a further period of five years after the expiration thereof, they shall inform in writing the party of the first part at least six months prior to expiration of said. lease of that fact; whereupon the party of the first part obligates himself by signature below to grant said extension,” is a stipulation for mere extension of the time of the enjoyment of the lease, in contradistinction from an agreement to execute a renewal .of the contract, and will become binding without further consideration or stipulation, upon notice being given as therein specified. 18 Am. & Eng. Enc. Law (-2d ed.), 693-695; *Hamby & Toomer*v. *Georgia Iron*& *Coal Co.,*127 *Ga.*792 (56 S. E. 1033); *Kerr*v. *Black,*137 *Ga.*832 (74 S. E. 535); *Walker*v. *Wadley,*124 *Ga.*275 (52 S. E. 904).

2. Where a lease is so executed, and is duly recorded, subsequent purchasers from the lessor will take subject to the right of the lessee, or his assigns, to give the notice and bring about an extension of tbe time of the contract.

3. In an action for injunction by such subsequent purchasers, heard upon an agreed statement of facts, where it appeared that the defendant, an assignee of such lease duly recorded, as mentioned in the preceding notes, gave written notice to the lessor, eleven months before expiration of the term, of his desire to extend the time of the lease, and such extended time had not expired, it was not error to refuse the injunction.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                         967,574
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  310,202
<ALLOWANCES>                                    16,730
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,360,511
<PP&E>                                       9,035,105
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,677,432
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,718,184
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          237,530
<BONDS>                                        536,258
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,931,968
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,718,184
<SALES>                                      4,608,277
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,608,277
<CGS>                                        1,775,206
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,775,206
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,119,952
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              49,624
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                775,464
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            775,464
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   774,464
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       26
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       26
        

</TABLE>
U.S. Dept Commerce/NOAA/NMFS/NWFSC/PublicationsNOAA Tech Memo NMFS NWFSC-8: Contaminant Exposure in Juvenile Salmon (cont): Figure 2 
Table of Contents
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 49 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.Con.Res.49
                                       Agreed to October 2, 2018        

                     One Hundred Fifteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
           the third day of January, two thousand and eighteen

                          Concurrent Resolution

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That in the enrollment of the bill S. 2553, the Secretary of the Senate 
shall make the following correction:
        Amend the title so as to read: ``A bill to amend title XVIII of 
    the Social Security Act to prohibit Medicare part D plans from 
    restricting pharmacies from informing individuals regarding the 
    prices for certain drugs and biologicals.''.
Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.
Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.
```
"Brown, Elizabeth" <eabrown@steptoe.co

m>
06/26/2008 11:31 AM To Jean Holmes/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

cc Subj

ect Ammonia - petition to cancel - follow up

Jean: I just wanted to follow up on our conversation this morning regarding the Nalco petition to cancel ammonia registrations. If you have any questions or need anything further, please don't hesitate to contact me.

Regards,

Elizabeth

Elizabeth Anne Brown, Ph.D.

Technical and Regulatory Analyst

Steptoe & Johnson, LLP

1330 Connecticut Avenue, NW

Washington, DC 20036

tel: 202-419-5166

fax: 202-429-3902

eabrown@steptoe.com

This email may contain information that is privileged, conf idential, or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you have received this email in error, do not copy, distribute, save or otherwise use. Please notify the sender immediately at "eabrown@steptoe.com".
- Digital Government Strategy
- Early Learning
- ED Data Express
- Infrastructure and Sustainability
- Homeless Students
- Keeping the Promise
- Military Families and Veterans
- Rural Education
- White House Initiatives
-82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72 -70

36 38 40 42



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲

▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 2000 500 18 12 06 00 05/30 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 30 May 06

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.92 N 77.01 WMeters AGL
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Golf Rounds.com, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended August 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.




Date: March 8, 2012
By:
/s/Robert H. DonehewRobert H. DonehewPresident (Principal Executive Officer) andTreasurer (Principal Financial Officer)
p. 1


# OAR Box 1384 Prepped byCharmelle Mathews



## Document

Number: 

# 147 ) ll-E-107 Docket Number: 

# A-94-5 2

Printed 7/2/20088:42:08AM Sheet 147 of 264P. 2

From : "Goldberg , Bob " <BG0L461@ECY.WA.G0V > To : 'MADELEIN E STRUM ' <STRUM.MADELEINE@epamail.epa.gov.. . Date : 11/5/9 7 7:30p m Subject : Lasc o resi n Jus t finishe d talking wit hGordo nLow e o f Lasco , an d h e confirme d tha t th e Lasc o plan t i nYelm , W Ai s currentl yusing a 30 % styren e resi nfrom Gwi l i nproduction , a s wel l a s a 30 % styren e ge l coat . They'r e shooting fo r lowe r styren e level s i nth e ge l coa t (28%) . Goo d stuff . Bo bGoldber g Washingto nStat e Departmen t o f Ecolog y Southwes t Regiona l Offic e Hazardou s Wast e an

d Toxic s Reductio nProgra m P.O . Bo x4777 5 Olympia , W

A98504-777 5 phone : (360 ) 407-635 0 fax : (360 ) 407-630 5 e-mail : bgol461@ecy.wa.go v URL : www.wa.gov/ecology/hwt r
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 5.1.1

Eastern Division

Estella Walker, et al.

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:12−cv−01422

Honorable Joan H. Lefkow

The City of Chicago, et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Tuesday, April 16, 2013:

 MINUTE entry before Honorable Mary M. Rowland: Settlement conference held

on 4/16/2013. Parties have reached an agreement. Parties have consented to the

Jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge. Status hearing set for 5/30/2013 at 09:00 AM unless

Parties file Stipulation to dismiss prior to hearing. Mailed notice(gel, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:12-cv-01422 Document #: 56 Filed: 04/16/13 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:227
Exhibit 99.1

                Report of Independent Accountants


To the Board of Directors of Canal Electric Company:

We have reviewed the accompanying condensed balance sheet of Canal Electric
Company as of September 30, 1999 and the related condensed statements of
income for the three and nine-month periods ended September 30, 1999 and
condensed cash flows for the nine-month period ended September 30, 1999.  We
did not perform a review of the condensed statements of income for the three
and nine-month periods ended September 30, 1998 and cash flows for the nine-
month period ended September 30, 1998.  These financial statements are the
responsibility of management.

We conducted our review in accordance with standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.  A review of interim
financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures
to financial data and making inquiries of persons responsible for accounting
and financial matters.  It is substantially less in scope than an audit
conducted in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards, the
objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial
statements taken as a whole.  Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that
should be made to the accompanying financial statements in order for them to
be in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.


Hartford, Connecticut                      PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
November 15, 1999
#### Annette Weiss, Respondent, v. Viola Lynn, Individually and as Executrix of Sam Lynn, Deceased, Appellant.

On the court’s own motion, the second paragraph of its decision of June 24, 1963 *(ante,*p. 659) is amended to read as follows: “Judgment reversed on the law and on the facts, and a new trial ordered with respect to the issues as to the disputed $10,000 loan, with costs to the defendant to abide the determination of such issues upon the new trial.” Ughetta, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld, Brennan, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
1 The Honorable Charles A. Shaw, UnitedStates District Judge for the Eastern

District of Missouri. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________ No. 99-1547EM

_____________ Teresa Watson, * * Appellant, * On Appeal from the United * States District Court v. * for the Eastern District * of Missouri. Southwestern Bell Telephone * Company, * [Not to be Published] * Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: December 3, 1999 Filed: December 27, 1999

___________ Before RICHARD S. ARNOLD, BOWMAN, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. TeresaWatson appeals from the District Court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment in her employment discrimination action. After de novo review, see Lynn v. Deaconess Med. Ctr.-W. Campus , 160 F.3d 484, 486 (8th Cir. 1998) (standard of review for summary judgment); Cole v. Control Data Corp. , 947 F.2d 313, 315 (8th Cir. 1991) (standard of review for state claim), we conclude the District Court’s-2-

judgment was proper for the reasons stated in the Court’s thorough opinion. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. Rule 47B. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
AMENDMENT NO. 4 TO THE NASA RESEARCH ANNOUNCEMENT (NRA) ENTITLED

"RESEARCH OPPORTUNITIES IN SPACE AND EARTH SCIENCES (ROSES) 2010," 

NNH10ZDA001N, RELEASED FEBRUARY 12, 2010 

Final text for Appendix A.24: Enhancing the Capability of Computational Earth System 

Models and NASA Data for Operation and Assessment. 

This solicitation offers investigators an opportunity to analyze, assess, and increase the 

impact of NASA data in research and operational environments, particularly in the areas 

of weather prediction, climate projection assessment, and global carbon cycle modeling 

in anticipation of carbon management regulations. This solicitation seeks three areas of 

proposals: (a) Acceleration of Operational Use of Research Data including Joint Center 

for Satellite Data Assimilation (JCSDA), (b) data for IPCC climate projection 

assessment, and (c) computational support of Earth system modeling. 

Amendment 4 releases the final version of the text of Appendix A.24, which replaces the 

draft text in its entirety. Notices of Intent to are due July 15, 2010 and Proposals are due 

September 17, 2010. 

Questions concerning this program may be addressed to Tsengdar Lee, Earth Science 

Division, Science Mission Directorate, NASA Headquarters, Washington, DC 20546-

0001; Telephone: (202) 358-0860; E-mail: tsengdar.j.lee@nasa.gov.