alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1378 

CAF 11-02269 

PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, VALENTINO, AND WHALEN, JJ. 

 

IN THE MATTER OF AMBER S.C. 

-------------------------------------- 

CHAUTAUQUA COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

SERVICES, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT; 

 

DAVID C., JR., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. 

(APPEAL NO. 4.) 

PATRICIA M. MCGRATH, LOCKPORT, FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

BARBARA L. WIDRIG, MAYVILLE, FOR PETITIONER-RESPONDENT. 

ROBERT W. SCHNIZLER, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD, JAMESTOWN, FOR AMBER S.C. 

 

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Chautauqua County

(Judith S. Claire, J.), entered October 20, 2011 in a proceeding

pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b. The order, among other

things, adjudged that respondent David C., Jr. permanently neglected

the subject child, Amber S.C. and transferred custody and guardianship

of the subject child to petitioner. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed without costs.

Same Memorandum as in Matter of Emerald L.C. (___ AD3d ___ [Dec.

21, 2012]).

Entered: December 21, 2012 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 46 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

<DOC>
115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. CON. RES. 46

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That, in the enrollment of the bill H.R. 5895, the Clerk of the House 
of Representatives shall make the following correction to the title so 
as to read: ``Making consolidated appropriations for Energy and Water 
Development, the Legislative Branch, Military Construction, Veterans 
Affairs, and Related Agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 
2019, and for other purposes.''.

            Passed the Senate September 12, 2018.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
115th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                            S. CON. RES. 46

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

     Directing the Clerk of the House of Representatives to make a 
               correction in the enrollment of H.R. 5895.
```
#### 1313.301 Governmentwide commercial purchase card.

The Department's procedures for the use and control of the Governmentwide commercial purchase card are set forth in CAM 1313.301.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES 

July 15, 2020 

Honorable Dr. Susan Bunting 

Secretary of Education 

Delaware Department of Education 

401 Federal Street, #2 

Dover, Delaware 19901 

susan.bunting@doe.k12.de.us 

Dear Secretary Bunting: 

This letter grants final approval under Section 421(b) of the General Education Provisions Act 

for grant award H027A180074 and H173A180025. 

The Department received your June 11, 2020 request on behalf of the Delaware Department of

Education for a waiver extending the period of availability for Federal fiscal year (FFY) 2018 

Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) Part B grant award funds. 

With this approval, the FFY 2018 IDEA Part B grant award funds will be available for obligation 

through September 30, 2021 and may be liquidated through December 30, 2021. 

Please contact your Office of Special Education Programs State Lead, Mohamed Soliman, at 

Mohamed.Soliman@ed.gov if you have any questions. 

Sincerely, 

/s/

Mark Schultz 

Commissioner, Rehabilitation Services Administration.

Delegated the authority to perform the functions and duties 

of the Assistant Secretary for the Office of Special 

Education and Rehabilitative Services.

cc: State Director 

400 MARYLAND AVE. S.W., WASHINGTON, DC 20202-2600 

www.ed.gov 

The Department of Education’s mission is to promote student achievement and preparation for global competitiveness 

by fostering educational excellence and ensuring equal access.
BD Data Sheet A

Loan Discharge Liabilities 	Office of Postsecondary Education	

January 2018	 U.S. Department of Education

The data presented here are the amount collected on loan discharge liabilities.  The data were compiled by the U.S. Department of Education’s Federal Student Aid (FSA) and Office of the Chief Financial Officer (OCFO).  Data are current as of December 1, 2017.  These loan discharge liabilities were asserted in Final Program Review Determinations (FPRDs) or Final Audit Determinations (FADs).  The data shown in Table A.1 represent liabilities collected from 25 schools.

**Table A.1: Loan Discharge Liabilities**

Assumptions

· Population—only schools that closed prior to the assertion of loan discharge liabilities were included here.  However, the audit and program review finding, ‘Loan Discharges’ does not distinguish discharges between false certification and closed school.  Table A.1 represents the sum of these for the selected population.

· Fiscal year—data were tabulated based on the fiscal year that the liability was asserted, not the year that the liability was collected.  

· Amount collected

· monies may still be collected in the future for liabilities asserted in prior years, meaning that the values in Table A.1 may change over time.  

· if amount collected is less than that asserted and more than one type of liability was assessed, then monies collected were applied to loan discharge liabilities first. For example, if an audit asserted $800,000 in loan discharge liabilities and $200,000 in other liabilities but we collected only $100,000, we applied that entire $100,000 to loan discharge liabilities.  In contrast, if the full $1,000,000 was collected on that audit, we applied $800,000 to discharge liabilities.

· Time series—predictive analytics are not recommended because annual totals are markedly driven by outliers in the small population.

DRT 1813.1	PUBLIC	1
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. John Henry Bell, Respondent, v. J. Edwin La Vallee, as Warden of Auburn Prison, et al., Appellants.

Order unanimously reversed on the law, writ dismissed, and relator remanded to the custody of the Warden of Auburn Prison; Memorandum: The Warden of Auburn Prison appeals from an order of Cayuga County Court which sustained a writ of habeas corpus, vacated a sentence imposed upon relator as a second felony offender and directed that he be resentenced as a first felony offender. The basis for sustaining the writ was the County Court’s determination that deferment of sentence, together with probation, did not constitute a legal conviction on a first felony so as to invoke section 470-b of the Code of Criminal Procedure for the purpose of conviction as a second felony offender. Section 470-b provides that “ For the purpose of indictment and conviction of a second offense, the plea or verdict and suspension of sentence * * * shall be regarded as a conviction Relator’s contention, as set forth in his petition, is that a “ deferred ” sentence is not a “ suspended ” sentence within the meaning of section 470-b. Any doubt in this respect was resolved by the Court of Appeals in *People*v. *Shaw*(1 N Y 2d 30). Chief Judge Conway in the prevailing opinion, at page 31, in referring to the defendant’s “ deferred ” sentence stated: “ Upon that conviction he received a sentence which we construe to be a suspended one.” The dissenting opinion of Judge Fhld concurred in this construction in the footnote at page 37 where he wrote “in its context, ‘deferred’ meant ‘suspended.’” We are not here concerned with postponement of sentence for indefinite period. *(Matter of Hogan*v. *Bohan,*305 N. Y. 110, 112-113; cf. Code Crim. Pro., § 933.) The deferred sentence and the placing of relator under probation upon his conviction for the first felony resulted in relator being properly classified as a second felony offender pursuant to the provisions of section 470-ib of the code. (Appeal by People from order of Cayuga County Court sustaining a writ of habeas corpus and ordering relator returned to Madison County Court for further proceedings.) Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Goldman, Henry and Noonan, JJ.
Exhibit 3 (a)

                    ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT
                           TO THE
                   ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
                             OF
                     ENSERCH CORPORATION



Pursuant to the provisions of Articles 4.04 and 10.03 of the Texas Business
Corporation Act, the undersigned corporation adopts the following articles of
amendment to its amended and restated articles of incorporation to be
effective as set forth herein.

                        ARTICLE ONE

The name of the corporation is ENSERCH Corporation.

                        ARTICLE TWO

The following amendment to the amended and restated articles of incorporation
was adopted by the sole shareholder of the corporation on May 14, 1999.  The
amended and restated articles of incorporation are amended to change the name
of the corporation.

The amendment alters or changes Article One of the amended and restated
articles of incorporation and the full text of each provision of Article One
is amended to read as follows:

                     "ARTICLE ONE

          The name of the Corporation is TXU Gas Company."


                      ARTICLE THREE

The number of shares of the corporation outstanding at the time of such
adoption was 201,000; and the number entitled to vote thereon was 201,000.

                      ARTICLE FOUR

The holder of all of the shares outstanding and entitled to vote on said
amendment has signed a consent in writing pursuant to Article 9.10 adopting
said amendment and any written notice required by Article 9.10 has been given.

                     ARTICLE FIVE



<PAGE>
This amendment does not necessitate an exchange, reclassification or
cancellation of issued shares.

                     ARTICLE SIX

This amendment does not effect a change in stated capital.


                   ARTICLE SEVEN

The name of the registered agent as PRESENTLY shown in the records of the
Texas Secretary of State is Texas Utilities Services Inc. (Office of the
Corporate Secretary).  The name of the NEW registered agent is TXU Business
Services Company (Office of the Corporate Secretary).  The address of the
registered office will remain the same.  This change of registered agent was
authorized by the Board of Directors of the Corporation.


                   ARTICLE EIGHT

This amendment shall be effective as of June 14, 1999.


                              ENSERCH CORPORATION




                                   By:
                                        John F. Stephens, Jr.
                                        Assistant Secretary
----

|  | 1. | The Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2013, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 7, 2013 (“accompanied report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | 2. | The information contained in the accompanied report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of Capital Southwest Corporation. |
|--|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  November 7, 2013 | By:    | /s/ Tracy L. Morris                    |  |
|------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------|--|
|                         |   | Tracy L. MorrisChief Financial Officer |  |

----
#### 212.7000 Scope of subpart.

This subpart implements 10 U.S.C. 3458 for the acquisition of innovative commercial products or commercial services through the use of a general solicitation known as a commercial solutions opening (CSO).
# Den Europæiske Unions C 330A/7. o

| | ISSN 1977-0871 |
| --- | --- |
| Den Europæiske Unions
  Tidende | C 330A |
| | |
| Dansk udgave | Meddelelser og oplysninger | 58. årgang7. oktober 2015 |

ISSN 1977-0871

Den Europæiske Unions

Tidende

C 330A

Dansk udgave

Meddelelser og oplysninger

58. årgang7. oktober 2015

---

| Informationsnummer | Indhold | Side |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Øvrige meddelelser |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURER |
| | Det Europæiske Personaleudvælgelseskontor (EPSO) |
| 2015/C 330A/01 | Annullering | 1 |

Informationsnummer

Indhold

Side

V   Øvrige meddelelser

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURER

Det Europæiske Personaleudvælgelseskontor (EPSO)

2015/C 330A/01

Annullering

1

---

| DA | |
| --- | --- |

DA

---

V Øvrige meddelelser

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURER

Det Europæiske Personaleudvælgelseskontor (EPSO)

| 7.10.2015 | DA | Den Europæiske Unions Tidende | CA 330/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.10.2015

DA

Den Europæiske Unions Tidende

CA 330/1

---

ANNULLERING

(2015/C 330 A/01)

Offentliggørelsen i Den Europæiske Unions Tidende
   (1) af almindelig udvælgelsesprøve EPSO/AD/321/15 — Administratorer inden for revision (AD 5/AD 7) — annulleres.

---

(1)  EUT C 316 A af 24.09.15, s. 1.

---
file:///P|/

... %20City/Request%20for%20Information%20on%20FGD%20Wastewater%20Treatment%20System%20at%20Homer%20City.txt [1/21/2010 9:31:15 AM] From: Kurtis Blohm To: jstanek@mwgen.com CC: Bartram, Deborah; Finseth, Thomas; Hall.Josh@epamail.epa.gov; Jordan.Ronald@epamail.epa.gov Date: 12/3/2009 9:53 AM Subject: Request for Information on FGD Wastewater Treatment System at Homer City Attachments: Questions for Homer City.doc

Mr. Stanek,

Thank you for your time on the phone on Tuesday. As I described on the phone, Eastern Research Group (ERG) is a technical contractor to U.S. EPA ’s Office of Water. We are currently supporting EPA’s Engineering and Analysis Division with revising the effluent limitations guidelines and standards for the steam electric power industry under contract number 68-C-02-095. For more information on steam electric effluent limitations guidelines and standards, please visit the following website:

http://www.epa.gov/guide/steam/

As a part of this process, EPA is planning to conduct sampling episodes at several power plants to collect wastewater samples from FGD wastewater treatment systems. Please note that these sampling episodes are different from the samples that you recently collected as part of EPA's methods study.

During EPA’s detailed study, EPA conducted a site visit at Homer City in February 2007 and collected wastewater samples in August 2007. During these plant visits, EPA collected information regarding the operation of the plant’s FGD system and FGD wastewater treatment system. EPA would like to confirm the information that was previously collected to identify if any changes have been made to the plant's operation. This up-to-date information will help EPA make decisions about which plants and systems will be selected for the as part of the rulemaking.

We would appreciate receiving responses to these questions by Wednesday, December 9th. As noted in the questions, please identify if any information should be handled as confidential business information. Please let me know if you have any questions. Additionally, you can contact Josh Hall via e-mail (hall.josh@epa.gov) or by phone (202-566-1002) if you have any questions.

Regards,

Kurt Blohm Chemical Engineer Eastern Research Group, Inc. 14555 Avion Pkwy, Suite 200 Chantilly, VA 20151 (703) 633-1675
U.S. Dept Commerce/NOAA/NMFS/NWFSC/PublicationsNOAA Tech Memo NMFS NWFSC-8: Contaminant Exposure in Juvenile Salmon (cont): Appendix Figure 3 
Table of Contents
209.405-2 Restrictions on subcontracting. ( a ) The contracting officer shall not consent to any subcontract with a firm, or a subsidiary of a firm, that is identified by the Secretary of Defense in SAM Exclusions as being owned or controlled by the government of a country that is a state sponsor of terrorism unless the agency head states in writing the compelling reasons for the subcontract. (See also 225.771.)
[79 FR 73489, Dec. 11, 2014]
**EXHIBIT 31.1**
**CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**
I, Alan Rosskamm, certify that:
1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Jo-Ann Stores,Inc. (the “registrant”); 2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period coveredby this report; 3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4) The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared; b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’sthird fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and
5) The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.   Date: December 7, 2004 /s/ Alan Rosskamm  By: Alan Rosskamm President and Chief Executive Officer
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Charles E. Morrow, Appellant.

Motion by appellant to dispense with printing and for assignment of counsel; or for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals. Motion in all respects denied. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Brennan and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
#### Annette Weiss, Respondent, v. Viola Lynn, Individually and as Executrix of Sam Lynn, Deceased, Appellant.

In an action on two promissory notes, the defendant appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered May 23, 1962 after trial, upon a jury’s verdict in plaintiff’s favor for a total of $15,000 plus interest. Judgment reversed on the law, and on the facts, and a new trial ordered, with costs to the defendant to abide the event. In our opinion, the verdict is against the weight of the credible evidence. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld, Brennan, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 15 (Tuesday, January 26, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 7102]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-01597]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders; 
Amended Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the National 
Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders Special 
Emphasis Panel, February 05, 2021, 11:00 a.m. to February 05, 2021, 
02:00 p.m., National Institutes of Health, Neuroscience Center, 6001 
Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852 which was published in the 
Federal Register on January 19, 2021, 85 FR 83977.
    This meeting date has been changed to 2/17/2021. The meeting is 
closed to the public.

    Dated: January 19, 2021.
Miguelina Perez,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2021-01597 Filed 1-25-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
(October 20, 1964)

#### Angelina Salzano et al., Appellants, v. City of New York, Respondent.

Judgment entered February 20,1964, unanimously reversed on the law and the facts and in the exercise of discretion, and a new trial ordered, with $50 costs to plaintiffs-appellants. A jury, by a 10-2 verdict, found for defendant in this action to recover damages for injuries sustained when the female plaintiff fell on a sidewalk. The trial which was limited to the question of liability, presented contested issues of negligence and contributory negligence. In our opinion plaintiffs were prevented from obtaining a fair trial by the cumulative effect of the improper conduct of the Trial Justice, as a consequence of which the jury could not have considered the issues in a fair, calm and unprejudiced manner. We said in *Lwant*v. *Adams*(17 A D 2d *657784) “Inevitably a trial court sets the pattern for the jury”. The Trial Judge unnecessarily criticized counsel for plaintiffs for wasting time when counsel properly interposed objections, gratuitously commented on the credibility of a witness and found fault with counsel because of a refusal to stipulate certain evidence. The injection of such comments was improper and unwarranted and may well have diverted the jury from a consideration of the proper issues in the case. Moreover, there was improvident interference and interruption by the Trial Judge during summation by plaintiffs’ counsel. Some inkling of the attitude of the Trial Judge during the trial may be gathered from the observations, made after the jury rendered its verdict, to the effect that the Trial Judge had never seen a case like this one where everybody failed to tell the truth. Apart from the prejudicial remarks, the Trial Judge improperly excluded from evidence an enlarged photograph of the sidewalk showing the hole upon which the plaintiff slipped; and incorrectly ruled that the son of plaintiffs could not testify as to the condition of the ground where his mother had fallen. Under the circumstances, plaintiffs did not have a fair trial. A new trial is required in the interests of justice. (Cf. *Soto*v. *Correa,*20 A D 2d 694; *Henry*v. *Board of Educ.,*20 A D 2d 555; *Goldbard*v. *Kirchik,*20 A D 2d 725; *Bishin*v. *New York Cent. B. B. Co.,*20 A D 2d 921; *Levy*v. *Beilly,*18 A D 2d 632; *Kamen Soap Prods. Co.*v. *Prusansky <& Prusansky,*11 A D 2d 676.) It should not be necessary constantly to reiterate that plaintiffs and defendants are entitled to and should be accorded a fair trial, and as we said in *Buckley*v. *2570 Broadway Corp.*(12 A D 2d 473) the Trial Judge should *“*at all times maintain an impartial attitude and exercise a high degree of patience and forbearance.” The type of error alluded to herein results only in superfluous appeals and new trials. Concur — Valente, J. P., McNally, Stevens, Eager and Witmer, JJ.