alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case: 1:11-cv-07972 Document #: 113-3 Filed: 09/04/13 Page 1 of 18 PageID #:1559
Case: 1:11-cv-07972 Document #: 113-3 Filed: 09/04/13 Page 2 of 18 PageID #:1560
Case: 1:11-cv-07972 Document #: 113-3 Filed: 09/04/13 Page 3 of 18 PageID #:1561
Case: 1:11-cv-07972 Document #: 113-3 Filed: 09/04/13 Page 4 of 18 PageID #:1562
Case: 1:11-cv-07972 Document #: 113-3 Filed: 09/04/13 Page 5 of 18 PageID #:1563
Case: 1:11-cv-07972 Document #: 113-3 Filed: 09/04/13 Page 6 of 18 PageID #:1564
Case: 1:11-cv-07972 Document #: 113-3 Filed: 09/04/13 Page 7 of 18 PageID #:1565
Case: 1:11-cv-07972 Document #: 113-3 Filed: 09/04/13 Page 8 of 18 PageID #:1566
Case: 1:11-cv-07972 Document #: 113-3 Filed: 09/04/13 Page 9 of 18 PageID #:1567
Case: 1:11-cv-07972 Document #: 113-3 Filed: 09/04/13 Page 10 of 18 PageID #:1568
Case: 1:11-cv-07972 Document #: 113-3 Filed: 09/04/13 Page 11 of 18 PageID #:1569
Case: 1:11-cv-07972 Document #: 113-3 Filed: 09/04/13 Page 12 of 18 PageID #:1570
Case: 1:11-cv-07972 Document #: 113-3 Filed: 09/04/13 Page 13 of 18 PageID #:1571
Case: 1:11-cv-07972 Document #: 113-3 Filed: 09/04/13 Page 14 of 18 PageID #:1572
Case: 1:11-cv-07972 Document #: 113-3 Filed: 09/04/13 Page 15 of 18 PageID #:1573
Case: 1:11-cv-07972 Document #: 113-3 Filed: 09/04/13 Page 16 of 18 PageID #:1574
Case: 1:11-cv-07972 Document #: 113-3 Filed: 09/04/13 Page 17 of 18 PageID #:1575
Case: 1:11-cv-07972 Document #: 113-3 Filed: 09/04/13 Page 18 of 18 PageID #:1576
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order 

September 28, 2005 

128277 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v 

RONALD D. THOMAS, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 SC: 128277 

 COA: 247853 

Wayne CC: 02-013277 

Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 25, 2005 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

t0919 

I, CORBIN R. DAVIS, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 28, 2005 

Clerk
**EXHIBIT      10.32**

----

----

**THIS      WARRANT AND THE SECURITIES REPRESENTED HEREBY HAVE NOT BEEN REGISTERED UNDER      THE      SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED, AND MAY NOT BE OFFERED, SOLD, ASSIGNED      OR      TRANSFERRED, IN THE ABSENCE OF AN EFFECTIVE REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER SAID      ACT OR UNLESS THE COMPANY HAS RECEIVED AN OPINION OF COUNSEL REASONABLY      SATISFACTORY TO THE COMPANY THAT REGISTRATION UNDER SAID ACT IS NOT REQUIRED.      **

** **

** **

----

----

** **

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

|            |
|-----------------|
|  (Name)    |
|            |
|            |
|            |
|  (Address) |

----

----

----

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

                                                                   
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 27

THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS OF BRUNO'S, INC. FOR THE SIX MONTHS PERIOD ENDED AUGUST 1, 1998, AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-01-1998
<CASH>                                           2,751
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   28,551
<ALLOWANCES>                                       517
<INVENTORY>                                    189,888
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               265,609
<PP&E>                                         331,850
<DEPRECIATION>                                 335,969
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 639,519
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          131,235
<BONDS>                                        400,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              255
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (531,333)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   639,519
<SALES>                                        994,022
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               994,022
<CGS>                                          776,010
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  776,010
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               262,597
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,544
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (46,129)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (46,129)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (46,129)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (1.81)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (1.81)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 23.1





Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





To The Board of Directors


Fushi Copperweld, Inc and Subsidiaries





We consent to the use of our reports dated March 9, 2010 (March 28, 2011 as to the effects of the restatements discussed in Note 2), with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Fushi Copperweld, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated statements of income and other comprehensive income, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2009 and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, which reports appear in the December 31, 2009 annual report on Form 10-K of Fushi Copperweld, Inc.  We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement on Form S-3/A (No. 333-160449) appearing in this annual report on Form 10-K of Fushi Copperweld, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2009.





/S/ Frazer Frost, LLP (Successor Entity of Moore Stephens Wurth Frazer and Torbet, LLP, see Form 8-K filed on January 7, 2010)





Brea, California




April 4, 2011
| **Scientific Investigations Report 2005-5075**
Changes in Ground-Water Levels in the Carlin Trend Area, North-Central Nevada, 1989-2003
*By* Russell W. Plume

Prepared in cooperation with the |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Geneva Resources, Inc.
                                   Suite 505
                                  219 Broadway
                             Laguna Beach, CA 92651

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

April 27, 2000

Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street N. W.
Washington, D.C. 20549

Attn:  Mr. H. Roger Schwall, Assistant Director
       Ms. Kim Calder, Assistant Chief Accountant
       Ms. Jill Davis
       Ms. Jennifer Bowes

RE:  Vega-Atlantic Corporation
     File No. 0-27845

Dear Mr. Schwall:

We submit the following representations which respond to comment number 1 and
the request from the Securities and Exchange Commission in its letter dated
April 26, 2000 addressed to Vega-Atlantic Corporation (the "Company").

I, Marcus Johnson, am the President of Geneva Resources, Inc. ("Geneva"), and
represent that the following are true and correct statements:

     1.   During the week of April 10th through April 14th, 2000,
          representatives of Intergold Corporation, Geneva and the Company met
          in Salt Lake City, Utah, with counsel regarding the pending litigation
          between Intergold Corporation/Geneva and AuRIC Metallurgical
          Laboratories LLC ("AuRIC") and Dames & Moore.

     2.   On approximately April 10th and April 11th, representatives of
          Intergold Corporation, Geneva and the Company met to discuss the
          potential damages incurred by Intergold Corporation and Geneva arising
          from the various breaches of contract by AuRIC and Dames & Moore.
          Subsequently, representatives of Geneva and the Company discussed the
          material breach of the sub-license agreement by Geneva and the
          resulting damages incurred by the Company.

     3.   Representatives of Geneva and The Company further discussed the
          entitlement of the Company to receive a proportionate amount of any
          damages awarded to Geneva.

<PAGE>


Securities and Exchange Commission
Page Two
April 27, 2000



     4.   Representatives of Geneva and the Company reached a mutual
          understanding and verbal agreement that the Company will be entitled
          to receive a proportionate amount of any damages awarded to Geneva as
          compensation for the material breach by Geneva of the sub-license
          agreement. I have reviewed the disclosure contained in the Form 10SB
          registration statement of the Company regarding such mutual
          understanding and agree that the disclosure therein is accurate.



Sincerely,


/s/ Marcus Johnson
------------------
Marcus Johnson, President
# 2017 FOIA Log
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 12 (Thursday, January 21, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 6355]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-00987]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Aging Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis 
Panel RADx clinical trials.
    Date: February 26, 2021.
    Time: 11:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, 7201 
Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892. (Video Meeting)
    Contact Person: Maurizio Grimaldi, MD, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Branch, National Institute on Aging, 
National Institutes of Health, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Gateway 
Building, Suite 2W200, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 496-9374, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#492e3b202428252d20247b092428202567272021672e263f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="412633282c202d25282c73012c20282d6f2f28296f262e37">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging 
Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 12, 2021.
Miguelina Perez,
Program Analyst,Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2021-00987 Filed 1-19-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Case: 1:12-cv-03376 Document #: 11 Filed: 05/23/12 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:66

Case: 1:12-cv-03376 Document #: 11 Filed: 05/23/12 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:67
#### Seaboard Air-Line Railway *v.*Howe.

Hill, J.

1. The evidence tending to show that the lumber of the plaintiff was burned by fire negligently set out by a locomotive of the defendant, and the value of the lumber, was sufficient to authorize the finding of the jury and the charge of the court complained of.

2. The jury found a stipulated amount as principal, and interest in a separate amount. There was no error on the part of the court in *430causing them to retire, with instructions that whatever they found as principal and interest should be united in one lump sum. *Western & Atlantic R. Co.*v. *Brown,*102 *Ga.*13 (29 S. E. 130).

February 12, 1913.

Action for damages. Before *Judge*Conyers. *Glynn*superior court. November 4, 1911.

*Bolling Whitfield,*for plaintiff in error. *D. W. Kraitss,*contra.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Beclc, J., absent. The other Justices concur.*
Disclaimer

### State Department of Education

Office of the State Superintendent of EducationGovernment of the District of Columbia1050 First Street, NEWashington, DC 20002Phone: (202) 727-6436Fax: (202) 727-2019Website: http://osse.dc.gov/

### State Higher Education Agency

Office of the State Superintendent of Education (District of Columbia)Division of Postsecondary and Career Education (Postsec)1050 First Street, NEWashington, DC 20002Phone: (202) 727-6436Website: https://osse.dc.gov/page/college-and-career-education

### Special Education Agency

District of Columbia Public SchoolsSpecial Education Office1200 First Street, NEWashington, DC 20002Phone: (202) 442-5885Website: https://dcps.dc.gov/specialeducation

### State Adult Education Agency

Adult and Family Education  Office of the State Superintendent of Education Postsecondary and Career Education1050 First Street, NEWashington, DC 20002 Phone: (202) 741-5531 Fax: (202) 741-0229 Website: http://osse.dc.gov/service/adult-and-family-education

Back to state map
#### 215.370-1 Definition.

As used in this section—

*Selected Reserve* has the meaning given that term in 10 U.S.C. 10143. Selected Reserve members normally attend regular drills throughout the year and are the group of Reserves most readily available to the President.

[87 FR 15814, Mar. 18, 2022]
17.605 Award, renewal, and extension. ( a ) Effective work performance under management and operating contracts usually involves high levels of expertise and continuity of operations and personnel. Because of program requirements and the unusual (sometimes unique) nature of the work performed under management and operating contracts, the Government is often limited in its ability to effect competition or to replace a contractor. Therefore contracting officers should take extraordinary steps before award to assure themselves that the prospective contractor's technical and managerial capacity are sufficient, that organizational conflicts of interest are adequately covered, and that the contract will grant the Government broad and continuing rights to involve itself, if necessary, in technical and managerial decisionmaking concerning performance.
( b ) The contracting officer shall review each management and operating contract, following agency procedures, at appropriate intervals and at least once every 5 years. The review should determine whether meaningful improvement in performance or cost might reasonably be achieved. Any extension or renewal of an operating and management contract must be authorized at a level within the agency no lower than the level at which the original contract was authorized in accordance with 17.602(a).
( c ) Replacement of an incumbent contractor is usually based largely upon expectation of meaningful improvement in performance or cost. Therefore, when reviewing contractor performance, contracting officers should consider— ( 1 ) The incumbent contractor's overall performance, including, specifically, technical, administrative, and cost performance;
( 2 ) The potential impact of a change in contractors on program needs, including safety, national defense, and mobilization considerations; and
( 3 ) Whether it is likely that qualified offerors will compete for the contract.
215.404-71-1 General. ( a ) The weighted guidelines method focuses on four profit factors— ( 1 ) Performance risk;
( 2 ) Contract type risk;
( 3 ) Facilities capital employed; and
( 4 ) Cost efficiency.
( b ) The contracting officer assigns values to each profit factor; the value multiplied by the base results in the profit objective for that factor. Except for the cost efficiency special factor, each profit factor has a normal value and a designated range of values. The normal value is representative of average conditions on the prospective contract when compared to all goods and services acquired by DoD. The designated range provides values based on above normal or below normal conditions. In the price negotiation documentation, the contracting officer need not explain assignment of the normal value, but should address conditions that justify assignment of other than the normal value. The cost efficiency special factor has no normal value. The contracting officer shall exercise sound business judgment in selecting a value when this special factor is used (see 215.404-71-5).
[67 FR 20689, Apr. 26, 2002]
219.705-4 Reviewing the subcontracting plan. ( d ) ( i ) Challenge any subcontracting plan that does not contain positive goals. A small disadvantaged business goal of less than five percent must be approved one level above the contracting officer.
( ii ) The contracting officer may use the checklist at PGI 219.705-4 when reviewing subcontracting plans in accordance with FAR 19.705-4.
[82 FR 61480, Dec. 28, 2017]
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Thunder Mountain Gold Inc, (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Eric T. Jones, Secretary/Treasurer, Director and Chief Financial Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Eric T. Jones

By  ____________________________________

Eric T. Jones

Secretary/Treasurer and Director and Chief Financial Accounting Officer

Date:  March 30, 2010
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

OFFICE OF POSTSECONDARY EDUCATION

2023 Negotiated Rulemaking Student Debt Relief Committee

Session 4, February 22 and 23, 2024

Agenda

Thursday, February 22, 2024

I. Welcome, Opening Remarks, Administrative Business

II. Department’s Opening Remarks by Under Secretary James Kvaal

III. Draft Regulatory Text

IV. Lunch Break

V. Draft Regulatory Text 

VI. Wrap Up and Questions

VII. Break

VIII. Public Comment

Friday, February 23, 2024

I. Welcome, Opening Remarks, Administrative Business

II. Draft Regulatory Text 

III. Lunch Break 

IV. Draft Regulatory Text

V. Final Consensus Check on Regulatory Text

VI. Closing Remarks
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

EASTERN DIVISION 

M.G.S., an adjudicated adult ward under 

court appointed guardianship, by NextFriends, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

CAROLYN TOERPE, Court-Appointed 

Guardian, et al. 

Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No. 11-cv-7934

Honorable Judge Guzman

Magistrate Judge Gilbert 

	

	



	
		



 	





	






moves to dismiss Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint pursuant to Rule 

12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, stating as follows: 

 




   ! 
"



"
"#
$






%&'(

)


%&*(	$

$+

"#
$


,







$

-$

$

..
"


/.00120	



$&"
3





"3


$"
"
"3




 

FILED 1/4/2012

THOMAS G. BRUTON CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT

Case: 1:11-cv-07934 Document #: 44 Filed: 01/04/12 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:178
2

 Respectfully submitted, 

 /s/ Deborah M. Beltran

LISA MADIGAN Deborah Morgan Beltran, Illinois 6283574 

Illinois Attorney General James A. Lang, Illinois 06211100 

 Assistant Attorneys General

 General Law Bureau 

 100 West Randolph Street, 13th Floor 

 Chicago, IL 60601 

 Phone: (312) 814-6534/5694 

 Fax: (312) 814-4425 

 dbeltran@atg.state.il.us 

 jlang@atg.state.il.us

Case: 1:11-cv-07934 Document #: 44 Filed: 01/04/12 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:179
1

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

 The undersigned attorney hereby certifies that the foregoing document was filed on 

Thursday, December 22, 2011, through the Court’s CM/ECF system. Notice of this filing will 

be sent by electronic mail to all counsel of record by operation of the Court’s electronic filing 

system. Parties of record may access this filing through the Court’s system. Notice of this filing 

has also been sent by first class mail to the following at their addresses of record: 

Gloria Jean Sykes 

6016 N. Avondale Ave. 

Chicago, IL 60631 

Scott Evans 

960 Beau Dr. #305 

Des Plaines, IL 60016 

Sue Fege 

922 Willson Dr. 

Des Plaines, IL 60016 

/s/ Deborah M. Beltran

Case: 1:11-cv-07934 Document #: 44 Filed: 01/04/12 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:180
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Jose Antonio Rullan, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Kings County, rendered October 19, 1960 after a jury trial, convicting him of burglary in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to serve a term of five to ten years. Judgment affirmed. No opinion. Beldock, P. J., Kleinfeld, Brennan, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.