alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

EXHIBIT 13.1

|CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO                     
|----------------------------------------------
|18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

In connection with the Transition
Report of Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 20-F for
the eleven months ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"). I, David Wolfin,
Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of
      section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                   
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                 
| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

|Date: July 14, 2008 | /s/
      David Wolfin                   
|------------------- | -----------------------------------------
|                    | David Wolfin, Principal Executive Officer

---
1 In The



### Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

_________________

NO. 09

- 12

- 00 461

- CV



### _________________

WILLIAM T. KANE AND MARSHA KANE

, Appellant s

V.

WOODFOREST NATIONAL BANK , Appellee

________________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 9th District Court

Montgomery County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 12

- 01

- 00452 CV

________________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The appellant s

, William T. Kane and Marsha Kane

, have filed a motion to dismiss

this appeal. The appellants allege their appeal is moot because the trial court granted their

motion for new trial. The motion is voluntarily made by the appellant s prior to any

decision of this Court. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1). No other party filed notice of

appeal. We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal.2

APPEAL DISMISSED.

________________________________ CHARLES KREGER

Justice

Opinion Delivered November 29, 2012

Before McKeithen, C.J., Gaultney and Kreger, JJ.
#### 1422.1403 Waivers.

The Director, PAM is authorized to waive any or all of the terms of the clause at FAR 52.222-36, Affirmative Action for Workers with Disabilities, under the conditions prescribed in FAR 22.1403(a), and waive any requirement in FAR Subpart 22.14 as prescribed in FAR 22.1403(b). Requests for waivers shall be made in writing by the CO through the HCA to the Director, PAM.
#### Dunigan *v.*Duke.

November 20, 1912.

Certiorari. Before Judge Brand. Jackson superior court. September 23, 1911. -

*Ray & Ray,*for plaintiff in error.

Evaxs, P. J.

The judgment rendered by the ordinary was demanded by the evidence, and the judge of the superior court did not err in refusing to reverse it on writ of certiorari.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
###### Editorial Note on Part 724

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 724 appear at 65 FR 62616, Oct. 19, 2000.

#### § 724.402 Naval Discharge Review Board.

As defined in § 724.102.
United States

Environmental Protection

Agency

EPA420-F-01-011

April 2001

Office of Transportation and Air Quality

Buying A

New Car?

www.epa.gov/greenvehicles

EPA’s Green Vehicle

Guide will help you

choose the cleanest and

most fuel efficient

vehicle that meets your

needs.

Low emissions and good

fuel economy are both

important for the

environment.

EPA’s Green Vehicle Guide rates cars and

trucks according to their emission and fuel

economy performance.

The Green Vehicle Guide also contains other

useful information related to emissions and

fuel economy.
Test your environmental

knowledge by taking the

following short True/False quiz:

1. A vehicle with good fuel economy will have the

cleanest emissions.

2. Fuel economy is directly related to global

warming.

3. If I need to buy a large vehicle, I won’t have

any choice to buy something cleaner and more

fuel efficient.

ANSWERS:

1. FALSE. Not all vehicles with good fuel

economy have the cleanest emissions. For

instance, diesel-fueled vehicles may get higher

fuel economy, but produce larger amounts of

particulate matter, a likely carcinogen, and

oxides of nitrogen, a smog-forming pollutant,

than gasoline vehicles.

2. TRUE. The better the fuel economy, the less

production of the greenhouse gas carbon

dioxide. Greenhouse gases contribute to global

warming.

3. FALSE. You may be surprised at the choices

you have, even within a class of vehicles. Check

 at Green Vehicle Guide out the 

. www.epa.gov/greenvehicles

EPA’s Office of Transportation and Air Quality:

“Moving America Towards Cleaner Air”
March 27, 1975.

M. P. No. 75-58.

#### Edward C. Tavares *v.*Employees’ Retirement System of the City of Providence *et al.*

*Hawkins & Hoopis, Harry J. Hoopis,*for petitioner. *Louis A. Mascia,*City Solicitor, *Steven S. Saber,*Asst. City Solicitor, for respondent.

Petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The instant case is consolidated for the filing of briefs and hearing before this court with the case of *Tavares*v. *Employees’ Retirement System,*No. 75-9-A.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-03-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-28-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-03-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                0.00001
<CASH>                                             612
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   18,064
<ALLOWANCES>                                       529
<INVENTORY>                                     18,124
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                38,971
<PP&E>                                          38,290
<DEPRECIATION>                                  32,933
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  58,589
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           26,684
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           118
<OTHER-SE>                                      24,206
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    58,589
<SALES>                                        124,589
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               124,589
<CGS>                                           98,557
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   98,557
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                51,249
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 7,416
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 721
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (26,122)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (26,122)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (26,122)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2.44)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.44)
        

</TABLE>
#### 225.302 Contractors performing private security functions outside the United States.
Publications

NOAA-NMFS-NWFSC TM-31: Data Collection -- Groundfish (cont): 

## Appendix B

*List follows:Robins, C. R., and six coauthors. 1991. List of common and scientific names of fishes. American Fisheries Society Special Publication 20. 

Table of Contents
209.202 Policy. ( a ) (1) Except for aviation or ship critical safety items, obtain approval in accordance with PGI 209.202(a)(1) when establishing qualification requirements. See 209.270 for approval of qualification requirements for aviation or ship critical safety items.
[73 FR 1827, Jan. 10, 2008]
This document contains CBI and is not available online or from the USEPA Docket

Center. Please contact the Document Control Officer listed in the Federal

Register.
ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS             Exhibit 99


             UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                         Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 11-K


           X                    ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 15 (d)
                                OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
                                For the fiscal year ended December 31, 1999

                                                    OR

                                TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 15 (d)
                                OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
                                For the transition period from        to

                               Commission File Number 1-10602

A.        Full title of the plan and the address of the plan, if different from
          that of the issuer name below.

          The Bank of Louisville Employee Stock Ownership Plan

B.        Name of the issuer of the securities held pursuant to the plan and
          the address of its principal executive office.

          Mid-America Bancorp
          500 West Broadway
          Louisville, Kentucky 40202


                               REQUIRED INFORMATION

Financial statements and schedules prepared in accordance with the financial
reporting requirements of ERISA will be filed in paper, as permitted by Rule
101 (6) (3) of Regulation S-T within 180 days of the Plan's year-end (December
31, 1999).
No. 89-1338.

#### Walter *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
DEPARTMENT OF 

U.S . DEPARTMEN T O F TRANSPORTATIOS^^NSPORTATION 

Office of Hearings • -• >^-t f OPERATIONS 

Washington, D.C. 

m NOV 15 P 1:U9 

Shane KNissen 

FAA DOCKET NO. CP04GL0001 

(EIR2002-GL-31-0034) 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

(Fflft26b^-/qi6i 

Administrative Law Judge Richard C. Goodwin 

Agency Information Notification 

The Agency Attorney hereby notifies Administrative Law Judge Richard C. Goodwin that 

the Agency has contacted the North Kem State Prison where Mr. Nissen, the Respondent is a 

prisoner. The Records department of the prison reviewed the records available and stated that 

Shane K Nissen, CDCR #T76107, is not scheduled to be released until 2017. 

Dated this IsJ day of November 2010. 

Senior Attorney 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Great Lakes Region, AGL-7K 

2300 East Devon Avenue 

Des Plaines, IL 60018 

Phone: (847)294-7713 

Fax: (847) 294-7498 -cer 
n 

i 

Certificate of Service 

I hereby certify that the foregoing Agency Response to Second Letter has been mailed this day by 

First Class Mail to: 

Original and One Copy: 

Hearing Docket 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, SW 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building ~ Room 2014 

One Copy to: 

Shane Kyle Nissen T-76107 

N.K.S.P. D-6-133L 

P.O. Box 5005 

Delano, CA 93216 

Telephone: * 

Fax: * 

One Copy to: 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin 

Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E., Room E-12-320 

Washington, DC 20590 

Telephone: (202) 366-2139 Attorney Advisor 

(202) 366-2139 Legal Assistant 

Fax: (202) 366-7536 

Dated this 1st day of November 2010. 

Tammy Gardner 

Legal Technician 

FAA Great Lakes
Disclaimer

### State Department of Education

Michigan Department of EducationP.O. Box 30008608 West Allegan StreetLansing, MI 48909Phone: (833) 633-5788Website: http://www.michigan.gov/mde/

### State Higher Education Agency

Michigan Student AidPO Box 30462Lansing, MI 48909-7962Phone (888) 447-2687 Website: http://www.michigan.gov/mistudentaid

### Special Education Agency

Office of Special Education and Early Intervention ServicesMichigan Department of EducationP.O. Box 30008608 West Allegan StreetLansing, MI 48909Phone: (888) 320-8384Website: https://www.michigan.gov/mde/Services/special-education

### State Adult Education Agency

Adult Services SectionTalent Investment Agency – Workforce DevelopmentVictor Office Center, Fifth Floor 201 North Washington Square Lansing, MI 48913 Phone: (517) 373-1692Website: http://www.michigan.gov/adulteducation/

Back to state map
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

KIRSHA BROWN-YOUNGER, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) No. 12 C 1979

)

LULU.COM, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

MEMORANDUM ORDER

This Court has been called upon to write several opinions in this action bought by pro se

plaintiff Kirsha Brown-Younger ("Brown-Younger"), most recently the July 3, 2012

memorandum opinion and order that sought to place in proper perspective the matters that had

gone before. That July 3 opinion concluded in this fashion:

As plain as Brown-Younger's multiple Rule 11 violations appear to be, Rule

11(c)(3) calls for her to be given the opportunity to show cause why no such

violations have taken place and, in this instance, why dismissal of this action is

not an appropriate sanction. This Court orders her to file such a showing on or

before July 24, 2012.

Now July 24 has come and gone without any further input from Brown-Younger, even

though she has earlier been an extraordinarily active litigant generating multiple filings. It must

be assumed, then, that she is unable to show cause as to why she should not be held to have

violated Rule 11 in the various respects earlier spoken of by this Court. As for the nature of the

sanctions to be imposed because of her multiple violations, dismissal of this action is certainly
appropriate, and this Court so orders. This Court will await input from any defense counsel who 1

may view further sanctions as called for (for example, earlier submissions on behalf of defendant

Amazon had included a Rule 11 warning letter sent to Brown-Younger early in the game).

__________________________________________

Milton I. Shadur

Senior United States District Judge

Date: July 25, 2012

 It will be recalled that this Court had earlier stated at page 10 of the July 3 opinion that 1

if what later emerged during these proceedings had been known from the beginning,

Brown-Younger would have been denied in forma pauperis status under the standards

exemplified by Lee v. Clinton. 

- 2 -
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6738

DONALD L. WILKINS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

ROY D. BRADLEY, Assistant Public Defender,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge.

(CA-96-375-2)

Submitted: November 7, 1996 Decided: November 19, 1996

Before RUSSELL and WIDENER, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Donald L. Wilkins, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant, a Virginia inmate, appeals the district court's

order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint under

28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) (1994), amended by Prison Litigation Reform

Act, Pub. L. No. 104-134, 110 Stat. 1321 (1996). We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion and find that this

appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the

reasoning of the district court. Wilkins v. Bradley, No. CA-96-375-

2 (E.D. Va. Apr. 29, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
III 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 56 

Providing for the use of the catafalque situated in the Exhibition Hall of 

the Capitol Visitor Center in connection with memorial services to be 

conducted in the rotunda of the Capitol for the late George Herbert 

Walker Bush, 41st President of the United States. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 3, 2018 

Mr. BLUNT (for himself and Ms. KLOBUCHAR) submitted the following 

concurrent resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Providing for the use of the catafalque situated in the Exhibition Hall of the Capitol Visitor Center in connection 

with memorial services to be conducted in the rotunda 

of the Capitol for the late George Herbert Walker Bush, 

41st President of the United States. 

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives 

2 concurring), That the Architect of the Capitol is author3 ized and directed to transfer the catafalque which is situ4 ated in the Exhibition Hall of the Capitol Visitor Center 

5 to the rotunda of the Capitol so that such catafalque may 

6 be used in connection with services to be conducted there 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•SCON 56 ATS 

1 for the late George Herbert Walker Bush, 41st President 

2 of the United States. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice of Meeting.

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel's Notices and Correspondence Project Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Tuesday, February 9, 2021.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Robert Rosalia at 1-888-912-1227 or (718) 834-2203.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory                           ( print page 6740)                        Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel's Notices and Correspondence Project Committee will be held Tuesday, February 9, 2021, at 1:30 p.m. Eastern Time. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited time and structure of meeting, notification of intent to participate must be made with Robert Rosalia. For more information please contact Robert Rosalia at 1-888-912-1227 or (718) 834-2203, or write TAP Office, 2 Metrotech Center, 100 Myrtle Avenue, Brooklyn, NY 11201 or contact us at the website:                     *http://www.improveirs.org.*                     The agenda will include various IRS issues.                

Dated: January 15, 2020.

Kevin Brown,

Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

[FR Doc. 2021-01372 Filed 1-21-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
# Úřední věstník C 345/2015

| | ISSN 1977-0863 |
| --- | --- |
| Úřední věstník
  Evropské unie | C 345 |
| | |
| České vydání | Informace a oznámení | Svazek 5818. října 2015 |

ISSN 1977-0863

Úřední věstník

Evropské unie

C 345

České vydání

Informace a oznámení

Svazek 5818. října 2015

---

| Oznámeníč. | Obsah | Strana |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Informace |
| | INFORMACE ORGÁNŮ, INSTITUCÍ A JINÝCH SUBJEKTŮ EVROPSKÉ UNIE |
| | Rada |
| 2015/C 345/01 | Prohlášení Rady | 1 |

Oznámeníč.

Obsah

Strana

IV   Informace

INFORMACE ORGÁNŮ, INSTITUCÍ A JINÝCH SUBJEKTŮ EVROPSKÉ UNIE

Rada

2015/C 345/01

Prohlášení Rady

1

---

| CS | |
| --- | --- |

CS

---

IV Informace

INFORMACE ORGÁNŮ, INSTITUCÍ A JINÝCH SUBJEKTŮ EVROPSKÉ UNIE

Rada

| 18.10.2015 | CS | Úřední věstník Evropské unie | C 345/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.10.2015

CS

Úřední věstník Evropské unie

C 345/1

---

PROHLÁŠENÍ RADY

(2015/C 345/01)

Rada konstatuje, že závazkem zrušit v souladu se společným komplexním akčním plánem veškeré sankce EU související s jadernými otázkami není dotčen mechanismus řešení sporů, jenž je ve společném komplexním akčním plánu stanoven, ani opětovné zavedení sankcí EU v případě, že Írán výrazně nedodrží své závazky, které ze společného komplexního akčního plánu vyplývají.

V případě, že Írán své závazky vyplývající ze společného komplexního akčního plánu výrazně nedodrží, je Rada odhodlána na základě společného doporučení, které jí předloží vysoký představitel Unie pro zahraniční věci a bezpečnostní politiku, Francie, Německo a Spojené království, bez odkladu opětovně zavést veškeré sankce EU související s jadernými otázkami, jež byly pozastaveny nebo ukončeny.

---
#### 213.500-70 Only one offer.

If only one offer is received in response to a competitive solicitation issued using simplified acquisition procedures authorized under FAR subpart 13.5, follow the procedures at 215.371-2.

[80 FR 21657, Apr. 20, 2015, as amended at 80 FR 36718, June 26, 2015]
M. P. No. 75-151.

#### The Narragansett Electric Company *v.*Rhode Island Commission for Human Rights.

*Tillinghast, Collins & Graham, Peter J. McGinn, Elia Germani,*for petitioner. *Julius C. Michaelson,*Attorney General, *R. Daniel Prentiss,*Special Asst. Attorney General, for respondent.

Petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The petitioner’s motion for stay of order of the Rhode Island Commission for Human Rights and the Superior Court’s affirmance thereof is granted. The case assigned for hearing on the merits to the calendar for October 1975.