Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 107 / Monday, June 4, 2012 / Notices 32959 

1The Budget for Fiscal Year 2013—Section 737 

of the General Provisions Government-wide, 

Performance Partnerships Pilots (see 

www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/ 

budget/fy2013/assets/ggp.pdf). 

VII. Agency Contact 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Carmen Sanchez, U.S. Department of 

Education, 400 Maryland Avenue SW., 

Room 4057, Potomac Center Plaza 

(PCP), Washington, DC 20202–2600. 

Telephone: (202) 245–6595. 

If you use a TDD or a TTY, call the 

Federal Relay Service (FRS), toll free, at 

1–800–877–8339. 

VIII. Other Information 

Accessible Format: Individuals with 

disabilities can obtain this document 

and a copy of the application package in 

an accessible format (e.g., braille, large 

print, audiotape, or compact disc) by 

contacting the Grants and Contracts 

Services Team, U.S. Department of 

Education, 400 Maryland Avenue SW., 

Room 5075, PCP, Washington, DC 

20202–2550. Telephone: (202) 245– 

7363. If you use a TDD or a TTY, call 

the FRS, toll free, at 1–800–877–8339. 

Electronic Access to This Document: 

The official version of this document is 

the document published in the Federal 

Register. Free Internet access to the 

official edition of the Federal Register 

and the Code of Federal Regulations is 

available via the Federal Digital System 

at: www.gpo.gov/fdsys. At this site you 

can view this document, as well as all 

other documents of this Department 

published in the Federal Register, in 

text or Adobe Portable Document 

Format (PDF). To use PDF you must 

have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is 

available free at the site. 

You may also access documents of the 

Department published in the Federal 

Register by using the article search 

feature at: www.federalregister.gov. 

Specifically, through the advanced 

search feature at this site, you can limit 

your search to documents published by 

the Department. 

Dated: May 29, 2012. 

Alexa Posny, 

Assistant Secretary for Special Education and 

Rehabilitative Services. 

[FR Doc. 2012–13500 Filed 6–1–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4000–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION 

[Docket ID: ED–2012–OVAE–0014] 

Request for Information on Strategies 

for Improving Outcomes for 

Disconnected Youth 

AGENCY: Office of Vocational and Adult 

Education, Department of Education. 

ACTION: Request for information. 

SUMMARY: The President’s FY 2013 

Budget (FY 2013 budget) included a 

request for authority to implement 

‘‘Performance Partnership Pilots’’ that 

would improve outcomes for 

disconnected youth. In order to inform 

the Administration’s development of 

that initiative, this request for 

information (RFI) seeks 

recommendations on effective 

approaches for improving outcomes for 

disconnected youth by working across 

Federal, State, and local community 

programs and systems that provide 

services to disconnected youth. The 

input we receive will inform the 

deliberations of the Federal Interagency 

Forum on Disconnected Youth about the 

best use of the authority requested in 

the FY 2013 budget for the Performance 

Partnership Pilots and on other actions 

the Administration might take to 

improve outcomes for disconnected 

youth. In addition, responses may also 

be used to identify opportunities for 

flexibility within existing authorities. 

DATES: Responses must be received by 

July 5, 2012. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments 

through the Federal eRulemaking Portal 

or via U.S. mail, commercial delivery, or 

hand delivery. We will not accept 

comments by fax or by email. To ensure 

that we do not receive duplicate copies, 

please submit your comments only one 

time. In addition, please include the 

Docket ID and the term ‘‘Performance 

Partnership Response’’ at the top of your 

comments. 

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to 

www.regulations.gov to submit your 

comments electronically. Information 

on using Regulations.gov, including 

instructions for accessing agency 

documents, submitting comments, and 

viewing the docket, is available on the 

site under ‘‘How to Use This Site.’’ 

• U.S. Mail, Commercial Delivery, or 

Hand Delivery: If you mail or deliver 

your comments, address them to Annie 

Blackledge, Attention: Improving 

Outcomes for Disconnected Youth RFI, 

U.S. Department of Education, 400 

Maryland Avenue SW., room 11089, 

Potomac Center Plaza, Washington, DC 

20202–7241. 

• Privacy Note: The Department’s 

policy for comments received from 

members of the public (including 

comments submitted by mail, 

commercial delivery, or hand delivery) 

is to make these submissions available 

for public viewing in their entirety on 

the Federal eRulemaking Portal at 

www.regulations.gov. Therefore, 

commenters should be careful to 

include in their comments only 

information that they wish to make 

publicly available on the Internet. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Meg Massey by email: 

mmassey@omb.eop.gov; or Annie 

Blackledge by email: 

Annie.Blackledge@ed.gov. 

If you use a telecommunications 

device for the deaf (TDD) or a text 

telephone (TTY), call the Federal Relay 

Service (FRS), toll free, at 1–800–877– 

8339. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Purpose 

This request for information offers 

States, tribal governments, local entities, 

community-based and other non-profit 

organizations, private-sector partners, 

philanthropic organizations, faith-based 

organizations, researchers, and other 

interested individuals and entities the 

opportunity to provide 

recommendations on effective 

approaches for improving outcomes for 

disconnected youth by working across 

programs and systems that provide 

relevant services to them. For the 

purposes of this RFI, ‘‘to improve 

outcomes for disconnected youth’’ 

means to increase the rate at which 

young people ages 14 to 24 who are 

homeless, in foster care, involved in the 

juvenile justice system, or are neither 

employed nor enrolled in an 

educational institution achieve success 

in meeting educational, employment, 

and other key lifelong development 

goals. 

The public input provided in 

response to this notice will inform the 

deliberations of the Interagency Forum 

on Disconnected Youth about 

determining the best use of the authority 

requested in the President’s FY 2013 

budget for the Performance Partnership 

Pilots.1 If legislation provides this 

authority, these pilots would create 

innovative and comprehensive 

reengagement strategies that encourage 

additional academic and non-academic 

supports and support multiple 

pathways to prepare disconnected youth 

for college and career success. 

Responses to the RFI will also inform 

how the Department of Education (ED), 

the Department of Health and Human 

Services (HHS), and the Department of 

Labor (DOL) could deploy other 

resources for disconnected youth that 

have been requested in the FY 2013 

budget. In addition, the Department of 

Justice (DOJ) and the Department of 

Housing and Urban Development (HUD) 

are interested in how their programs 


ebenthall on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
32960 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 107 / Monday, June 4, 2012 / Notices 

2 Disconnected Youth: A Look at 16- to 24-Year 

Olds Who Are Not Working or In School, 

Congressional Research Service, Adrienne L. 

Fernandes, Thomas Gabe April 22, 2009 

www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R40535.pdf. 

3www.serve.gov/new-images/council/pdf/ 

econ_value_opportunity_youth.pdf. 

4www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2011/02/ 

28/presidential-memorandum-administrativeflexibility. 

5See section 737 (page 14) of the Governmentwide General Provisions in the President’s FY 2013 

budget appendix: www.whitehouse.gov/sites/ 

default/files/omb/budget/fy2013/assets/ggp.pdf. 

The Performance Partnerships provision also 

includes authority for pilots in neighborhood 

revitalization, which is not the subject of this RFI. 

6These Performance Partnership Pilots would 

involve discretionary Federal resources only—not 

mandatory funding for entitlement programs, such 

as Medicaid. 

7www.serve.gov/council_home.asp. 

8http://findyouthinfo.gov/. 

serving disconnected youth could 

contribute to Performance Partnership 

Pilots and other efforts to improve 

outcomes for this population. 

Background 

Several reports indicate that there are 

millions of disconnected young people 

in the U.S. who are out of school, have 

not attained a high school diploma, and 

are out of work.2 The consequences of 

being disconnected are serious for both 

the individual and society, as these 

young people not only fail to meet their 

personal potential, but also cost the 

Nation billions of dollars every year in 

lost earnings, crime/incarceration, and 

expenditures on social and other 

services.3

Youth who are living in poverty, lowincome households, or foster care, or 

who are homeless or transitioning back 

to the community from incarceration, 

are disproportionately at risk of poor 

educational achievement, 

unemployment, or underemployment. 

Disconnected youth are not a 

homogenous group. Disconnected youth 

struggle with a range of barriers to 

positive education, employment, and 

other life-goal outcomes including, but 

not limited to single parenthood, lack of 

adequate housing, lack of secondary 

education, lack of job-skills training, 

physical or mental health challenges, 

substance abuse, and learning 

disabilities. Addressing the needs of 

these disconnected youth is critical to 

America’s economic future. 

The Administration’s discussions 

with States and local entities following 

the February 28, 2011, release of the 

presidential memorandum on 

administrative flexibility, lower costs, 

and better results for State, local, and 

tribal governments 4 suggests these 

young people might not be receiving the 

full benefits of the Federal, State, and 

local community programs, services, 

and resources available. The 

Administration’s discussions with 

States and local entities focused on five 

overarching challenges to the systems 

serving this population: 

• Limited evidence about effective 

models and strategies that support 

positive outcomes; 

• Lack of knowledge about the 

evidence that exists; 

• A relative lack of attention to this 

population at the Federal, State, and 

local levels; 

• Lack of coordination in addressing 

this population’s needs; and, 

• The need for more comprehensive 

approaches that meet the multi-faceted 

needs of this population. 

The President’s FY 2013 budget 

proposes a Government-wide authority 

to establish up to 13 Performance 

Partnership Pilots to improve outcomes 

for disconnected youth involving up to 

$130 million in existing discretionary 

Federal resources.5 The proposed 

authority would enable States and local 

entities to seek Federal approval to 

blend funds from multiple funding 

sources and obtain waivers, such as for 

program design, performance, and other 

requirements, that enable more effective 

uses of funding from programs serving 

disconnected youth. This proposal 

responds to requests from States and 

local entities for greater flexibility in 

managing resources provided by 

multiple Federal programs.6 The pilot 

would allow flexibility if communities 

can demonstrate how they will achieve 

better results for the high-need 

disconnected youth population. A State 

or local community could not propose 

to achieve its goals by reducing services 

to youth, particularly those who have 

multiple barriers to employment and 

education and are consequently the 

most difficult to serve. 

The FY 2013 budget does not request 

dedicated funding for Performance 

Partnership Pilots as they are designed 

to facilitate flexibility in use of existing 

program funds. However, outside of the 

Performance Partnerships authority, the 

Budget proposes program authority for 

new approaches to streamlining and 

improving delivery systems to provide 

better services to assist disconnected 

youth, including $5 million at ED, $5 

million at HHS, and a $10 million setaside within the DOL’s Workforce 

Innovation Fund. These funds, if 

approved by Congress, could potentially 

be used to enhance and support the 

State and local community activities 

undertaken in a Performance 

Partnership Pilot, such as activities that 

provide better information and tools to 

enable communities to direct their 

resources to strategies that work and to 

measure and evaluate successful 

practices. 

To further develop ideas on how the 

Performance Partnerships authority and 

the FY 2013 funding request for 

disconnected youth could support 

innovative approaches that improve 

service delivery, the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB), ED, 

HHS, DOL, DOJ, and HUD have 

established an Interagency Forum on 

Disconnected Youth to: 

• Align evidence standards across 

Federal agencies and programs; 

• Disseminate to policymakers and 

practitioners tools for measuring and 

evaluating outcomes for disconnected 

youth served by multiple systems; 

• Share best practices for effectively 

coordinating multiple systems and 

programs serving disconnected youth at 

the Federal, State, and local levels; 

• Solicit ideas from a broad array of 

stakeholders on strategies for improving 

outcomes for disconnected youth, 

including on how to facilitate 

comprehensive, multi-systems 

approaches and on how to use existing 

resources more effectively; 

• Assess the potential for the 

development of public-private 

partnerships through which foundations 

and other private-sector partners could 

support promising pilot projects and 

focus attention on the disconnected 

youth population; and 

• Work with States and local entities 

to align State and Federal rules and 

regulations in order to support 

implementation of the pilot projects and 

better outcomes for disconnected youth. 

The work of the Interagency Forum on 

Disconnected Youth will build on 

existing work done by the White House 

Council on Community Solutions 7

during 2011 and 2012 in order to 

identify effective collaborations and 

support educators and employers in 

reaching out to disconnected youth. It 

will also build on the work of the 

longstanding Interagency Working 

Group on Youth Programs 8 and various 

related initiatives. 

Request for Information 

Through this RFI, the Interagency 

Forum on Disconnected Youth and 

participating Federal agencies are 

soliciting ideas and information from a 

broad array of stakeholders on strategies 

for improving outcomes for 

disconnected youth, including on how 

to facilitate comprehensive, multisystem approaches and on how to use 

existing resources in more coordinated 

and comprehensive ways. Responses to 


ebenthall on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 107 / Monday, June 4, 2012 / Notices 32961 

9www.whitehouse.gov/administration/eop/oua/ 

initiatives/neighborhood-revitalization. 

10www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2012/01/24/paysuccess-new-results-oriented-federal-commitmentunderserved-americans/. 

this RFI will inform the work of the 

Interagency Forum on Disconnected 

Youth on the design, logistics, and 

feasibility of Performance Partnership 

Pilots. 

This RFI is for information and 

planning purposes only and should not 

be construed as a solicitation or as an 

obligation on the part of the Interagency 

Forum on Disconnected Youth or 

participating Federal agencies. 

We ask respondents to address the 

following questions, where possible, in 

the context of the discussion in this 

document. You do not need to address 

every question and should focus on 

those where you have relevant 

expertise. You may also address the 

questions in the context of a detailed 

pilot proposal outlining how a State, 

local, or tribal government could use the 

Performance Partnership authority to 

implement a comprehensive strategy for 

achieving better outcomes for 

disconnected youth. 

To the extent possible, please clearly 

indicate which question(s) you address 

in your response. 

Key Questions: 

1. What programs and strategies at the 

State or local level have shown great 

promise or have been proven to improve 

educational, employment, or other key 

outcomes for disconnected youth? 

2. How can we better align resources 

and administrative, regulatory, and 

statutory requirements to allow for more 

effective use of existing resources 

serving disconnected youth and stronger 

partnerships across levels of 

government and the private and nonprofit sectors? 

3. What key outcomes or indicators 

for individuals and communities are 

most important for measuring both 

short- and long-term progress for 

disconnected youth? 

Detailed Questions: 

I. Effective or Promising Practices and 

Strategies 

1. What Federal, State, and local 

programs or community collaborative 

efforts have improved outcomes for 

disconnected youth? What is the 

objective evidence of their success (e.g., 

evidence from rigorous evaluations 

using, for instance, random assignment 

and regression discontinuity design)? 

2. What program designs have great 

promise of improving educational, 

employment, or other key outcomes for 

disconnected youth? What is the best 

evidence to support these program 

designs (e.g., correlational or 

longitudinal outcomes analyses)? 

3. What discrete interventions, 

strategies, or practices would need to be 

included in pilot designs or innovative 

programs to increase the likelihood of 

their success, particularly untested 

designs? 

4. What are the best ways to involve 

youth in planning and implementation 

in order to help ensure that projects will 

be effective in meeting their needs? 

II. Public and Private Partnerships 

1. Which State, local, non-profit, and 

business partners have been involved in 

the successful initiative(s) addressing 

the needs of disconnected youth that 

you may have described in response to 

one or more of the questions in this RFI? 

Which partners should be involved in 

the future? 

2. What role did or what role could 

philanthropic organizations play in 

supporting these types of initiatives you 

may have described in response to one 

or more of the questions in this RFI? 

3. How were the partnerships 

involved in those initiatives structured 

(e.g., governance models, provision of 

services, shared funding, collaborative 

professional development)? 

4. Which Federal programs should be 

involved in performance partnership 

pilots for disconnected youth? 

5. What has been your experience 

with other Federal initiatives that 

address issues related to disconnected 

youth by facilitating comprehensive, 

multi-system approaches and using 

existing resources in more coordinated 

and comprehensive ways, such as 

Promise Neighborhoods and Choice 

Neighborhoods within the 

Neighborhood Revitalization 

Initiative? 9

6. Do you see an opportunity to use 

the Pay for Success10 model which is 

currently being pursued under existing 

authority by the Departments of Labor 

and Justice, but which could potentially 

be expanded to other areas such as 

programs serving disconnected youth? 

III. Outcomes, Data, and Evaluation 

Design 

1. What are the key outcomes that 

pilots should measure, and what 

indicators should be used to track 

intermediate and long-term success for 

youth? 

2. What existing data collection 

mechanisms can be harnessed to track 

indicators, outcomes, and participant 

characteristics? 

3. What are examples of frameworks 

and protocols for sharing data efficiently 

across programs while meeting privacy 

and confidentiality requirements? What 

should be the specifications for 

additional frameworks or protocols for 

effective sharing of information? 

4. What are the best examples of 

communities and programs using data 

to track progress, inform course 

corrections, and evaluate program 

effectiveness? 

5. What evaluation designs should be 

used to demonstrate improved outcomes 

or improved cost-effectiveness of 

Performance Partnership Pilots? 

6. How do the Federal Government, 

States, and local entities ensure that the 

flexibility provided through the pilots 

does not have any adverse effect on the 

most vulnerable populations? 

IV. Barriers 

1. What are the legislative, regulatory, 

or other barriers that impede a 

community’s ability to implement the 

most cost-effective strategies to assist 

disconnected youth? 

2. Are the barriers created at the 

Federal, State, or local level? 

3. Could the barriers be overcome 

through administrative action? 

4. Would overcoming the barriers 

require changes in Federal or State 

laws? 

V. Alternative Pilot Designs 

1. Which of the following design 

models would best enable effective 

pilots at the community level? 

• Formula Grant Model: Communities 

would carve out a portion of funds from 

multiple formula grants serving youth 

and use the funds for a coherent, 

focused strategy to improve outcomes 

for disconnected youth. The 

community, the State, and Federal 

agencies would negotiate an agreement 

that would include a limited set of key 

outcomes and performance measures, a 

streamlined set of reporting 

requirements, and a strong evaluation 

strategy. 

• Competitive Grant Model: The 

Federal Government would issue a joint 

solicitation for grant applications that 

would pool funds from multiple 

competitive programs for outcomefocused projects. 

• Hybrid Model: The Federal 

Government would use a joint 

solicitation for grant applications to 

fund competitive grants for pilots. 

Competitive preference would be given 

to applicants proposing to achieve better 

results by blending their formula funds 

to support a more effective service 

strategy. 

2. What is the recommended duration 

of the performance partnership pilot 

projects for the model or models you 

selected as effective? 


ebenthall on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
32962 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 107 / Monday, June 4, 2012 / Notices 

Guidance for Submitting Documents 

We ask that each respondent include 

the name and address of his or her 

institution or affiliation, and the name, 

title, mailing and email addresses, and 

telephone number of a contact person 

for his or her institution or affiliation, if 

any. 

Rights to Materials Submitted 

By submitting material (e.g., 

descriptions of strategies for improving 

outcomes for disconnected youth) in 

response to this RFI, you agree to grant 

the Administration a worldwide, 

royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable, nonexclusive license to use the material, 

and to post it. Further, you agree that 

you own, have a valid license, or are 

otherwise authorized to provide the 

material to the Administration. 

The Administration will not provide 

any compensation for material 

submitted in response to this RFI. 

Request for Metadata Tags 

To make the best use of the 

information submitted in response to 

this RFI and to make it easier for 

interested parties to search, the 

Administration will include specific 

words or phrases—also known as 

‘‘keywords’’ or metadata ‘‘tags’’—with 

the material submitted. Therefore, you 

are strongly encouraged to use keywords 

or tags to identify components of the 

strategies described in your responses. 

The keywords or tags should be linked 

to, and accurately reflect substantial 

components of, the strategies, practices, 

programs, or other activities described 

in your submission. To simplify 

searches of the responses, Appendix A 

of this RFI provides a list of standard 

keywords and tags. You are encouraged 

to select from among these standard 

keywords and tags to the greatest extent 

possible. In the event that none of the 

words or phrases in Appendix A is 

sufficiently precise for the strategy that 

is the subject of your response, you may 

substitute other keywords or tags. Please 

do not provide more than eight 

keywords or tags for each strategy. 

Accessible Format: Individuals with 

disabilities can obtain this document in 

an accessible format (e.g., braille, large 

print, audiotape, or compact disc) on 

request to the program contact person 

listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION

CONTACT. 

Electronic Access to This Document: 

The official version of this document is 

the document published in the Federal 

Register. Free Internet access to the 

official edition of the Federal Register 

and the Code of Federal Regulations is 

available via the Federal Digital System 

at: www.gpo.gov/fdsys. At this site you 

can view this document, as well as all 

other documents of this Department 

published in the Federal Register, in 

text or Adobe Portable Document 

Format (PDF). To use PDF you must 

have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is 

available free at the site. 

You may also access documents of the 

Department published in the Federal 

Register by using the article search 

feature at: www.federalregister.gov. 

Specifically, through the advanced 

search feature at this site, you can limit 

your search to documents published by 

the Department. 

Authority: 20 U.S.C. 3401 and 3402, and 

20 U.S.C. 9253. 

Dated: May 30, 2012. 

Brenda Dann-Messier, 

Assistant Secretary for Vocational and Adult 

Education. 

Appendix A: Standard Keywords and 

Tags 

Population Descriptors 

• Disconnected Youth 

• Youth 

• Disadvantaged Youth 

• Out-of-School Youth 

• Workforce Investment Act (WIA) Youth 

• Youth in Adult Education 

• Young Adults 

• Vulnerable 

• Homeless Youth 

• Foster Youth 

• Runaway Youth 

• Human Trafficking Victims 

• Domestic Minor Sex Trafficking Victims 

• Dropouts 

• At-Risk Youth 

• Gang-Involved Youth 

• Youth in Single-Parent Households 

Service Descriptors 

• Youth Development 

• Youth Workforce Development 

• Youth and Basic Skills 

• Basic Skills 

• Adult Education 

• Workforce Investment Act Youth Services 

• Youth Service 

• Alternative Settings 

• Alternative High School 

• Adult High School 

• Youth Career Pathways 

• Career Pathways 

• Trauma Behavioral Health 

• Social and Emotional Well-Being 

Strategy and Practice Descriptors 

• Partnerships 

• Outreach 

• Alignment 

• Transition 

• Articulation 

• Dual Enrollment 

• Wrap-Around 

• Support 

• Holistic 

• Integrated 

• Team Teaching 

• Collaboration 

• Professional Development 

• Shared 

• Performance-Based Funding 

• Pay-for-Success Funding 

• Innovation 

Evidence Descriptors 

• Cohort 

• Random Assignment 

• Longitudinal 

• Evaluation 

• Action 

• Research 

• Impact 

• Documentation 

• Performance 

• Outcomes 

• Goal Achievement 

• Research-Based 

[FR Doc. 2012–13473 Filed 6–1–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4000–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 

[FE Docket No. 12–05–LNG] 

Gulf Coast LNG Export, LLC; 

Application for Long-Term 

Authorization To Export Domestically 

Produced Liquefied Natural Gas for a 

25-Year Period 

AGENCY: Office of Fossil Energy, DOE. 

ACTION: Notice of application. 

SUMMARY: The Office of Fossil Energy 

(FE) of the Department of Energy (DOE) 

gives notice of receipt of an application 

(Application), filed on January 10, 2012, 

by Gulf Coast LNG Export, LLC (Gulf 

Coast), requesting long-term, multicontract authorization to export 

domestically produced liquefied natural 

gas (LNG) in an amount up to the 

equivalent of 1,022 billion cubic feet 

(Bcf) of natural gas per year, which 

averages to 2.8 Bcf per day (Bcf/d), up 

to a total of 25.55 trillion cubic feet 

(Tcf), over a 25-year period, 

commencing on the earlier of the date 

of first export or eight years from the 

date the requested authorization is 

granted. Gulf Coast proposes to export 

LNG from a proposed natural gas 

liquefaction facility and LNG terminal 

to be located at the Port of Brownsville 

in Brownsville, Texas, which Gulf Coast 

plans to develop, to any country which 

has or in the future develops the 

capacity to import LNG via ocean-going 

carrier, and with which trade is not 

prohibited by U.S. law or policy. Gulf 

Coast seeks to export this LNG on its 

own behalf and also as agent for third 

parties. The Application was filed under 

section 3 of the Natural Gas Act (NGA). 

Protests, motions to intervene, notices of 

intervention, and written comments are 

invited. 


ebenthall on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES