5210 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 22 / Thursday, February 2, 2012 / Proposed Rules 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R07–OAR–2012–0053; FRL–9625–7] 

Approval and Promulgation of 

Implementation Plans and 

Designations of Areas for Air Quality 

Planning Purposes; Missouri and 

Illinois; St. Louis; Determination of 

Attainment by Applicable Attainment 

Date for the 1997 Ozone National 

Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to 

determine, pursuant to the Clean Air 

Act (CAA), that the bi-state St. Louis 

(MO–IL) ozone nonattainment area (‘‘St. 

Louis area’’) attained the 1997 8-hour 

ozone National Ambient Air Quality 

Standards (NAAQS) by the applicable 

attainment date of June 15, 2010. This 

proposed determination is based upon 

complete, quality-assured, and certified 

ambient air quality data from the 2007– 

2009 monitoring period which show 

that the St. Louis area has monitored 

attainment of the 1997 8-hour ozone 

NAAQS as of the applicable date. 

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before March 5, 2012. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R07– 

OAR–2012–0053, by one of the 

following methods: 

1. www.regulations.gov: Follow the 

on-line instructions for submitting 

comments. 

2. Email: kemp.lachala@epa.gov. 

3. Fax: (913) 551–9214. 

4. Mail: Lachala Kemp, Air Planning 

and Development Branch, 

Environmental Protection Agency 

Region 7, 901 North 5th Street, Kansas 

City, Kansas 66101. 

5. Hand Delivery or Courier: Lachala 

Kemp, Air Planning and Development 

Branch, Environmental Protection 

Agency Region 7, 901 North 5th Street, 

Kansas City, Kansas 66101. Such 

deliveries are only accepted during the 

Regional Office normal hours of 

operation, and special arrangements 

should be made for deliveries of boxed 

information. The Regional Office official 

hours of business are Monday through 

Friday, 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding 

Federal holidays. 

Instructions: Direct your comments to 

Docket ID No. EPA–R07–OAR–2012– 

0053. EPA’s policy is that all comments 

received will be included in the public 

docket without change and may be 

made available online at http:// 

www.regulations.gov, including any 

personal information provided, unless 

the comment includes information 

claimed to be Confidential Business 

Information (CBI) or other information 

whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Do not submit information that you 

consider to be CBI or otherwise 

protected through http:// 

www.regulations.gov or email. The 

http://www.regulations.gov Web site is 

an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which 

means EPA will not know your identity 

or contact information unless you 

provide it in the body of your comment. 

If you send an email comment directly 

to EPA without going through 

www.regulations.gov, your email 

address will be automatically captured 

and included as part of the comment 

that is placed in the public docket and 

made available on the Internet. If you 

submit an electronic comment, EPA 

recommends that you include your 

name and other contact information in 

the body of your comment and with any 

disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA 

cannot read your comment due to 

technical difficulties and cannot contact 

you for clarification, EPA may not be 

able to consider your comment. 

Electronic files should avoid the use of 

special characters, any form of 

encryption, and be free of any defects or 

viruses. 

Docket. All documents in the 

electronic docket are listed in the http:// 

www.regulations.gov index. Although 

listed in the index, some information is 

not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other 

information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. Certain other 

material, such as copyrighted material, 

will be publicly available only in hard 

copy. Publicly available docket 

materials are available either 

electronically in http:// 

www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at 

the U.S. Environmental Protection 

Agency Region 7, 901 North 5th Street, 

Kansas City, Kansas 66101, from 8 a.m. 

to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

excluding legal holidays. EPA requests 

that you contact the person listed in the 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT

section to schedule your inspection. The 

interested persons wanting to examine 

these documents should make an 

appointment with the office at least 24 

hours in advance. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Lachala Kemp, Air Planning and 

Development Branch, U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency 

Region 7, 901 N. 5th Street, Kansas City, 

Kansas 66101, at (913) 551–7214 or by 

email at kemp.lachala@epa.gov. In 

Region 5 contact Edward Doty, 

Attainment Planning and Maintenance 

Section, Air Programs Branch (AR–18J), 

77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, 

Illinois 60604, at (312) 886–6057 or by 

email at doty.edward@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Throughout this document, ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ 

or ‘‘our’’ refer to EPA. This section 

provides additional information by 

addressing the following questions: 

Table of Contents 

I. What action is EPA taking? 

II. What is the background for this action? 

III. What was the air quality in the St. Louis 

area for the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS 

for the 2007–2009 monitoring period? 

IV. What is the proposed action? 

V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews 

I. What action is EPA taking? 

Pursuant to section 181(b)(2) of the 

CAA, EPA is proposing to determine 

that the St. Louis area attained the 1997 

8-hour ozone NAAQS by its applicable 

attainment date of June 15, 2010. The St. 

Louis area is composed of Jefferson 

County, Franklin County, St. Louis 

County, St. Louis City, and St. Charles 

County in Missouri, and Madison, 

Monroe, Jersey, and St. Clair Counties in 

Illinois. This proposed determination is 

based upon complete, quality-assured 

and certified ambient air monitoring 

data from 2007–2009 which show that 

the St. Louis area monitored attainment 

of the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS as of 

its applicable attainment date. 

On June 9, 2011, EPA published in 

the Federal Register a final 

determination that the St. Louis area has 

attained the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS 

based on complete, quality-assured 

ozone monitoring data for 2008–2010, 

and the effect of that determination 

pursuant to 40 CFR 51.918. See 76 FR 

33647–50. Today’s proposed action is 

separate from and independent of EPA’s 

June 9, 2011 determination, and it does 

not affect or modify that rulemaking. 

Today’s proposed determination 

concerns an earlier period of air quality 

monitoring, and it addresses only EPA’s 

obligation under CAA section 181(b)(2) 

to determine whether the area attained 

the 8-hour ozone standard by its 

applicable June 15, 2010 attainment 

date. 

II. What is the background for this 

action? 

On July 18, 1997 (62 FR 38856), EPA 

promulgated an 8-hour ozone standard 

of 0.08 parts per million (ppm). On 

April 30, 2004 (69 FR 23858), EPA 

published a final rule designating and 

classifying areas under the 8-hour ozone 

NAAQS. These designations and 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 22 / Thursday, February 2, 2012 / Proposed Rules 5211 

classifications became effective June 15, 

2004. EPA designated as nonattainment 

any area that was violating the 8-hour 

ozone NAAQS based on the three most 

recent years of air quality data, 2001– 

2003. Under EPA’s implementation rule 

for the 1997 8-hour ozone standard (69 

FR 23951, April 30, 2004), an area was 

classified under subpart 2 of the CAA 

based on its 8-hour ozone design value 

(i.e. the three-year average annual 

fourth-highest daily maximum 8-hour 

average ozone concentration), if it had a 

1-hour design value at the time of 

designation at or above 0.121 ppm. See 

40 CRF 51.902(a). All other 

nonattainment areas were covered 

under subpart 1, based upon their 8- 

hour design values (69 FR 23958). The 

St. Louis area was classified as a subpart 

2, 8-hour ozone moderate 

nonattainment area by EPA on April 30, 

2004 (69 FR 23858, 23898, and 23915), 

based on the three most recent years of 

monitoring data (2001–2003), consistent 

with 40 CFR 51.903(a). 

As a moderate nonattainment area for 

the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS, the St. 

Louis (MO–IL) area had an applicable 

attainment date of June 15, 2010, as 

required by 40 CFR 51.903(a) Table 1. 

Pursuant to section 181(b)(2) of the 

CAA, EPA is required to make a 

determination as to whether the St. 

Louis area attained the standard as of its 

applicable attainment date. This 

determination is based on the area’s 

design value as of the attainment date, 

which in turn is based on the three most 

recent years of air quality data (2007– 

2009) prior to the attainment date. 

III. What was the air quality in the St. 

Louis area for the 1997 8-hour ozone 

NAAQS for the 2007–2009 monitoring 

period? 

Today’s rulemaking assesses whether 

the St. Louis area attained the 1997 8- 

hour ozone NAAQS by its applicable 

attainment date of June 15, 2010. Under 

EPA regulations at 40 CFR 50.15, the 

1997 8-hour primary and secondary 

ozone ambient air quality standards are 

met at an ambient air quality monitoring 

site when the 3-year average of the 

annual fourth-highest daily maximum 8- 

hour average ozone concentration is less 

than or equal to 0.08 ppm, as 

determined in accordance with 40 CFR 

part 50, Appendix I. Based on the 

rounding convention set forth in section 

2.3 of Appendix I, the smallest value 

that is greater than 0.08 ppm is 0.085 

ppm. 

EPA has reviewed the ambient air 

monitoring data for the St. Louis area for 

the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS, 

consistent with requirements contained 

at 40 CFR part 50. EPA’s review focused 

primarily on data recorded in the EPA 

Air Quality System (AQS) database for 

the St. Louis area for 2007–2009. 

Table 1 shows the 2007–2009 and 

2008–2010 ozone design values for the 

St. Louis area monitors with complete, 

quality-assured and certified data for 

that period. All data values are 

expressed in ppm. As shown in Table 1, 

all of these monitors recorded ozone 

design values less than 0.085 ppm for 

2007–2009 and 2008–2010, with the 

highest value at any monitor in the area, 

0.078 ppm, recorded at the West Alton 

monitor. 

TABLE 1—ANNUAL FOURTH-HIGHEST DAILY MAXIMUM 8-HOUR OZONE CONCENTRATIONS AND 3-YEAR AVERAGES IN PPM

FOR THE ST. LOUIS AREA MONITORS WITH COMPLETE DATA (2007–2009) AND (2008–2010) 

State County Monitor 

2007 

4th 

High 

(ppm) 

2008 

4th 

High 

(ppm) 

2009 

4th 

High 

(ppm) 

2010 

4th 

High 

(ppm) 

2007–2009 

Design 

value 

(ppm) 

2008–2010 

Design 

value 

(ppm) * 

Illinois ................................... Jersey .................................. Jerseyville 

17–083– 

1001.

0.075 0.069 0.068 0.072 0.070 0.069 

Madison ............................... Alton 17– 

119–0008.

0.081 0.068 0.067 0.080 0.072 0.071 

Maryville 17– 

119–1009.

0.087 0.070 0.074 0.074 0.077 0.072 

Wood River 

17–119– 

3007.

0.086 0.067 0.066 0.070 0.073 0.067 

St. Clair ................................ East St. 

Louis 17– 

163–0010.

0.077 0.064 0.069 0.072 0.070 0.068 

Missouri ................................ St. Charles ........................... West Alton 

29–183– 

1002.

0.089 0.076 0.071 0.084 0.078 0.077 

Orchard 

Farm 29– 

183–1004.

0.083 0.072 0.073 0.077 0.076 0.074 

St. Louis ............................... Maryland 

Heights 

29–189– 

0014.

0.094 0.069 0.070 0.076 0.077 0.071 

Pacific 29– 

189–0005.

0.085 0.064 0.064 0.069 0.071 0.065 

St. Louis City ....................... Blair Street 

29–510– 

0085.

0.087 0.073 0.065 0.071 0.075 0.069 

*Although the determination here is whether the area attained the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS based on 2007–2009 data, the 2010 data shows 

that all monitors in the St. Louis area continued to attain the NAAQS in 2008–2010. 

As shown above in Table 1, there 

were ten monitoring sites with complete 

data during the 2007–2009 monitoring 

period. Data are considered to be 

sufficient for comparison to the NAAQS 

if three consecutive complete years of 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
5212 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 22 / Thursday, February 2, 2012 / Proposed Rules 

1The monitoring network for the 2007–2009 

monitoring period met and exceeded the minimum 

criteria for ozone monitoring in 40 CFR part 58, 

Appendix D. 

2The MDNR did not request that the data from 

the discontinued monitor and the replacement 

monitor be combined. 

data exist. These ten monitoring sites 

with complete data provide an adequate 

basis for EPA to determine that the area 

has attained the NAAQS. See 40 CFR 

Part 58, Appendix D for network design 

criteria.1

Based on its evaluation of complete 

quality assured and certified data from 

the relevant monitoring sites for the 

2007–2009 monitoring period, EPA 

believes that the St. Louis area attained 

the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS by the 

June 15, 2010 attainment date. 

Two additional monitors have 

recorded data that are not considered as 

complete for the 2007–2009 monitoring 

period. Pertinent data from these sites 

are shown in Table 2. 

TABLE 2—ANNUAL FOURTH-HIGHEST DAILY MAXIMUM 8-HOUR OZONE CONCENTRATIONS AND 3-YEAR AVERAGES IN PPM

FOR THE ST. LOUIS AREA MONITORS WITH INCOMPLETE DATA

State County Monitor 

2007 

4th 

high 

(ppm) 

2008 

4th 

high 

(ppm) 

2009 

4th 

high 

(ppm) 

2010 

4th 

high 

(ppm) 

2008–2010 

average 

(ppm) 

Missouri ................................ Jefferson .............................. Arnold & Tenbrook 29–099– 

0012.

0.087 ............ ............ ............ ....................

Arnold West 29–099–0019 .. ............ 0.070 0.070 0.077 0.072 

The Arnold and Tenbrook site was 

discontinued after the 2007 ozone 

season because it no longer met siting 

criteria in 40 CFR 58.14(c)(6) and 

section 5 of Appendix E to Part 58, due 

to trees in the immediate vicinity of the 

site. The Arnold West site replaced the 

discontinued monitor and began 

operation in the 2008 ozone season. The 

Missouri Department of Natural 

Resources requested, and EPA 

approved, the discontinuation of the 

Arnold & Tenbrook monitor. The siting 

of the replacement monitor at the 

Arnold West site was approved in the 

2008 annual network plan as a more 

optimal location with respect to meeting 

the siting criteria in 40 CFR Part 58, 

including the criteria in section 5 of 

Appendix E.2 The two sites are located 

within two miles of each other, and if 

data from the Arnold and Tenbrook 

monitor was combined with data from 

the Arnold West monitor, the resulting 

2007–2009 design value would attain 

the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS at 0.075 

ppm. 

TABLE 3—DESIGN VALUES FOR INCOMPLETE DATA MONITORS COMPARED TO HIGHEST MONITORS IN THE ST. LOUIS

AREA, 2000–2010 

2000– 

2002 

Design 

value 

(ppm) 

2001– 

2003 

Design 

value 

(ppm) 

2002– 

2004 

Design 

value 

(ppm) 

2003– 

2005 

Design 

value 

(ppm) 

2004– 

2006 

Design 

value 

(ppm) 

2005– 

2007 

Design 

value 

(ppm) 

2006– 

2008 

Design 

value 

(ppm) 

2007– 

2009 

Design 

value 

(ppm) 

2008– 

2010 

Design 

value 

(ppm) 

Incomplete Data Monitors Arnold & Tenbrook 29– 

099–0012.

0.086 0.087 0.081 0.081 0.080 0.086 ............ ............ ............

Arnold West 29–099–0019 ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ 0.072 

Design Value Monitors ...... West Alton 29–183–1002 0.090 0.091 0.089 0.085 0.085 0.089 0.085 0.078 0.077 

Orchard Farm 29–183– 

1004.

0.090 0.092 0.088 0.086 0.086 0.089 0.082 0.076 0.074 

Table 3 lists data over the last ten 

years for the monitors with incomplete 

data in comparison with the monitors 

that determine the design value for the 

St. Louis area. The design value monitor 

for any three year period is the monitor 

recording the highest levels out of all 

the monitors in the nonattainment area. 

The design values are used to compare 

against the NAAQS. Table 3 illustrates 

that the Arnold and Tenbrook and 

Arnold West monitor’s three year 

monitoring averages in all cases have 

been below the design value monitor for 

the area. It also shows the continued 

decrease in overall ozone levels over 

this period. Although the data from 

these monitors are used for comparison 

to the 8-hour ozone NAAQS, the table 

demonstrates they are not the monitors 

that would set the design value for the 

area. The other monitors for the area, 

including the monitors which have 

historically set the design value for the 

area, all have complete data and 

recorded attainment of the 1997 8-hour 

ozone NAAQS during the 2007–2009 

period, as discussed above and shown 

in Table 1. Therefore, EPA believes it is 

reasonable to conclude that the area met 

the NAAQS based on complete data 

from the ten monitors recording values 

during the 2007–2009 period. 

EPA finds that Missouri and Illinois 

have exercised diligence in monitoring 

in the St. Louis area, and have worked 

cooperatively with EPA in evaluating 

and seeking approval for monitor 

closures and moves. 

EPA’s review of monitoring data from 

the 2007–2009 monitoring period is 

supported by corroborating data from 

2010 and shows that the St. Louis area 

attained the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS 

by its applicable attainment date of June 

15, 2010. 

IV. What is the proposed action? 

This action proposes to determine 

that the St. Louis area attained the 1997 

8-hour ozone NAAQS by its applicable 

attainment date of June 15, 2010, 

pursuant to CAA section 181(b)(2). 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 22 / Thursday, February 2, 2012 / Proposed Rules 5213 

V. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews 

This action proposes to make a 

determination of attainment based on 

air quality, and would not impose 

additional requirements beyond those 

imposed by state law. For that reason, 

this proposed action: 

• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ subject to review by the Office 

of Management and Budget under 

Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, 

October 4, 1993); 

• Does not impose an information 

collection burden under the provisions 

of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); 

• Is certified as not having a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

under the Regulatory Flexibility Act 

(5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.); 

• Does not contain any unfunded 

mandate or significantly or uniquely 

affect small governments, as described 

in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); 

• Does not have Federalism 

implications as specified in Executive 

Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 

1999); 

• Is not an economically significant 

regulatory action based on health or 

safety risks subject to Executive Order 

13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); 

• Is not a significant regulatory action 

subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 

28355, May 22, 2001); 

• Is not subject to requirements of 

Section 12(d) of the National 

Technology Transfer and Advancement 

Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because 

application of those requirements would 

be inconsistent with the CAA; and 

• Does not provide EPA with the 

discretionary authority to address, as 

appropriate, disproportionate human 

health or environmental effects, using 

practicable and legally permissible 

methods, under Executive Order 12898 

(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). 

In addition, this proposed 

determination that the St. Louis area 

attained the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS 

by its applicable attainment date does 

not have tribal implications as specified 

by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, 

November 9, 2000), because the SIPs are 

not approved to apply in Indian country 

located in the states, and EPA notes that 

it will not impose substantial direct 

costs on tribal governments or preempt 

tribal law. 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, ozone, Reporting and 

recordkeeping requirements. 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Dated: January 19, 2012. 

Karl Brooks, 

Regional Administrator, Region 7. 

Dated: January 25, 2012. 

Susan Hedman, 

Regional Administrator, Region 5. 

[FR Doc. 2012–2336 Filed 2–1–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES 

Centers for Medicare & Medicaid 

Services 

42 CFR Part 489 

[CMS–1350–NC] 

RIN 0938–AQ51 

Medicare Program; Emergency Medical 

Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA): 

Applicability to Hospital Inpatients and 

Hospitals With Specialized Capabilities 

AGENCY: Centers for Medicare & 

Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS. 

ACTION: Request for comments. 

SUMMARY: This request for comments 

addresses the applicability of the 

Emergency Medical Treatment and 

Labor Act (EMTALA) to hospital 

inpatients. 

DATES: Comment Date: To be assured 

consideration, comments on the 

Applicability of EMTALA to Hospitals 

with Specialized Capabilities (section 

II.B. of this document) must be received 

at one of the addresses provided below, 

no later than 5 p.m. EST on April 2, 

2012. 

ADDRESSES: In commenting, please refer 

to file code CMS–1350–NC. Because of 

staff and resource limitations, we cannot 

accept comments by facsimile (FAX) 

transmission. 

You may submit comments in one of 

four ways (please choose only one of the 

ways listed): 

1. Electronically. You may submit 

electronic comments on this regulation 

to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow 

the ‘‘Submit a comment’’ instructions. 

2. By regular mail. You may mail 

written comments to the following 

address ONLY: Centers for Medicare & 

Medicaid Services, Department of 

Health and Human Services, Attention: 

CMS–1350–NC, P.O. Box 8013, 

Baltimore, MD 21244–8013. 

Please allow sufficient time for mailed 

comments to be received before the 

close of the comment period. 

3. By express or overnight mail. You 

may send written comments to the 

following address ONLY: Centers for 

Medicare & Medicaid Services, 

Department of Health and Human 

Services, Attention: CMS–1350–NC, 

Mail Stop C4–26–05, 7500 Security 

Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21244–1850. 

4. By hand or courier. If you prefer, 

you may deliver (by hand or courier) 

your written comments before the close 

of the comment period to either of the 

following addresses: 

a. For delivery in Washington, DC— 

Centers for Medicare & Medicaid 

Services, Department of Health and 

Human Services, Room 445–G, Hubert 

H. Humphrey Building, 200 

Independence Avenue SW., 

Washington, DC 20201 

(Because access to the interior of the 

Hubert H. Humphrey Building is not 

readily available to persons without 

Federal government identification, 

commenters are encouraged to leave 

their comments in the CMS drop slots 

located in the main lobby of the 

building. A stamp-in clock is available 

for persons wishing to retain a proof of 

filing by stamping in and retaining an 

extra copy of the comments being filed.) 

b. For delivery in Baltimore, MD— 

Centers for Medicare & Medicaid 

Services, Department of Health and 

Human Services, 7500 Security 

Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21244–1850. 

If you intend to deliver your 

comments to the Baltimore address, 

please call telephone number (410) 786– 

1066 in advance to schedule your 

arrival with one of our staff members. 

Comments mailed to the addresses 

indicated as appropriate for hand or 

courier delivery may be delayed and 

received after the comment period. 

For information on viewing public 

comments, see the beginning of the 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Renate Dombrowski, (410) 786–4645, 

Ankit Patel, (410) 786–4537. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Inspection of Public Comments: All 

comments received before the close of 

the comment period are available for 

viewing by the public, including any 

personally identifiable or confidential 

business information that is included in 

a comment. We post all comments 

received before the close of the 

comment period on the following Web 

site as soon as possible after they have 

been received: http:// 

www.regulations.gov. Follow the search 

instructions on that Web site to view 

public comments. 

Comments received timely will also 

be available for public inspection as 

they are received, generally beginning 

approximately 3 weeks after publication 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS