alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                          5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the
Partnership's  audited  financial  statements for the quarter ended December 31,
1997 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                            1,000

<S>                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                       DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                    493
<SECURITIES>                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                               0
<ALLOWANCES>                                0
<INVENTORY>                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          493
<PP&E>                                     27
<DEPRECIATION>                              0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            520
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     215
<BONDS>                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<COMMON>                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                                305
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              520
<SALES>                                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          331
<CGS>                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             288
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            43
<INCOME-TAX>                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        43
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                               43
<EPS-PRIMARY>                            4.85
<EPS-DILUTED>                            4.85


</TABLE>
#### J. W. Johnson-Winco Corp. v. L S B Auction Products, Inc.

Motion for reargument denied. The court did not pass upon the question whether or not plaintiff is entitled to partial summary judgment for $1,028.28. Concur—Botein, P. J., Breitel, Babin, Eager and Bastow, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 26 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

<DOC>
115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. CON. RES. 26

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring),

SECTION 1. USE OF EMANCIPATION HALL FOR UNVEILING OF AMERICAN PRISONERS 
              OF WAR/MISSING IN ACTION (POW/MIA) CHAIR OF HONOR.

    (a) Authorization.--Emancipation Hall in the Capitol Visitor Center 
is authorized to be used for an event on November 8, 2017, to unveil 
the American Prisoners of War/Missing in Action (POW/MIA) Chair of 
Honor.
    (b) Preparations.--Physical preparations for the conduct of the 
ceremony described in subsection (a) shall be carried out in accordance 
with such conditions as may be prescribed by the Architect of the 
Capitol.

            Passed the Senate October 16, 2017.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
115th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                            S. CON. RES. 26

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Authorizing the use of Emancipation Hall in the Capitol Visitor Center 
 for the unveiling of the American Prisoners of War/Missing in Action 
                       (POW/MIA) Chair of Honor.
```
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 896 

To permanently reauthorize the Land and Water Conservation Fund. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 7, 2017 

Mr. BURR (for himself, Mr. BENNET, Ms. COLLINS, Mr. GARDNER, Mr. 

DAINES, Mrs. SHAHEEN, and Mr. HEINRICH) introduced the following 

bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 

Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To permanently reauthorize the Land and Water 

Conservation Fund. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT REAUTHORIZATION OF LAND AND 

4 WATER CONSERVATION FUND. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 200302 of title 54, United 

6 States Code, is amended— 

7 (1) in subsection (b), in the matter preceding 

8 paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘During the period end9 ing September 30, 2018, there’’ and inserting 

10 ‘‘There’’; and 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 896 IS

1 (2) in subsection (c)(1), by striking ‘‘through 

2 September 30, 2018’’. 

3 (b) PUBLIC ACCESS.—Section 200306 of title 54, 

4 United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the 

5 following: 

6 ‘‘(c) PUBLIC ACCESS.—Not less than 1.5 percent of 

7 amounts made available for expenditure in any fiscal year 

8 under section 200303, or $10,000,000, whichever is great9 er, shall be used for projects that secure recreational pub10 lic access to existing Federal public land for hunting, fish11 ing, and other recreational purposes.’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT NO. 32

CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. § 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

§ 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Form 10-K of Colony Bankcorp, Inc. (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2006 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Al D. Ross, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Terry L. Hester, Chief Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company, each hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of our knowledge and belief that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|                                     
|/s/ Al D. Ross                       
|Al D. Ross                           
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|March 15, 2007                       



|                                      
|--------------------------------------
|/s/ Terry L. Hester                   
|Terry L. Hester                       
|Chief Financial and Accounting Officer
|March 15, 2007                        

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not,
except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of § 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 5.1.1

Eastern Division

Steve A. Wilhelm

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:12−cv−01893

Honorable Milton I. Shadur

BNSF Railway Company

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Tuesday, November 12, 2013:

 MINUTE entry before Honorable Milton I. Shadur: Pursuant to the parties'

stipulation for voluntary dismissal, this case is hereby dismissed with prejudice, each

party to bear its own costs and fees. Status hearing set for 11/12/2013 is vacated. Civil

case terminated. Mailed notice by judge's staff. (srb,)

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:12-cv-01893 Document #: 46 Filed: 11/12/13 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:310
UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL

on

MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION

IN RE: INNOVATIO IP VENTURES, LLC,

PATENT LITIGATION MDL No. 2303

(SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE)

CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO−2)

On December 28, 2011, the Panel transferred 3 civil action(s) to the United States District Court for

the Northern District of Illinois for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28

U.S.C. §1407. See _F.Supp.2d_ (J.P.M.L. 2011). Since that time, 4 additional action(s) have been

transferred to the Northern District of Illinois. With the consent of that court, all such actions have

been assigned to the Honorable James F Holderman, Jr.

It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are

common to the actions previously transferred to the Northern District of Illinois and assigned to

Judge Holderman.

Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict

Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. §1407 to the

Northern District of Illinois for the reasons stated in the order of December 28, 2011, and, with the

consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable James F Holderman, Jr.

This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States

District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall be

stayed 7 days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the

Panel within this 7−day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel.

FOR THE PANEL:

 Jeffery N. Lüthi

Clerk of the Panel

A TRUE COPY-ATTEST

THOMAS G. BRUTON, CLERK

 -

By: s/ ENJOLI FLETCHER

DEPUTY CLERK

U.S. DISTRICT COURT, NORTHERN

DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

 -

April 16, 2012
IN RE: INNOVATIO IP VENTURES, LLC,

PATENT LITIGATION MDL No. 2303

SCHEDULE CTO−2 − TAG−ALONG ACTIONS

DIST DIV. C.A.NO. CASE CAPTION

CALIFORNIA NORTHERN

CAN 3 12−01076 Hewlett−Packard Company v. Innovatio IP Ventures,

LLC
M. P. No. 75-53.

#### In re Emil Carsetti.

*William F. Reilly,*Public Defender, for petitioner. *Julius C. Michaelson,*Attorney General, *Judith Romney Wegner,*Special Asst. Attorney General, for respondent.

Motion for the appointment of counsel is granted, and the Public Defender is directed to represent the petitioner.
-       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2024-09-11T15:40:43-0400
      - Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401
      - Government Publishing Office
      - Government Publishing Office attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by Government Publishing Office
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v. RAFAEL URQUIDEZ

- NAVA,

Defendant

- Appellant. No. 17

- 50274 D.C. No. 3:16

- cr - 03011

- LAB

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Larry A. Burns, District Judge, Presiding Submitted May 15, 2018 ** Before: SILVERMAN , BEA, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges. Rafael Urquidez

- Nava appeals from the district court ’s judgment and challenges the 18

- month sentence imposed following his guilty

- plea conviction for being a removed alien found in the United States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm

.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

MAY 22 2018 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 1 7

- 50274

Urquidez

- Nava contends that the district court procedurally erred by failing
to address his non - frivolous arguments for a lower sentence

. We review for plain
error, see United States v. Valencia

- Barragan , 608 F.3d 1103, 1108 (9th Cir. 2010), and conclude that there is none. The record reflects that the court considered Urquidez

- Nava’s mitigating ar guments and was not persuaded that they
warranted a lower sentence. See United States v. Perez

- Perez , 512 F.3d 514, 516

- 17 (9th Cir. 2008). Urquidez

- Nava next contends that the sentence is substantively unreasonable
because the district court gave undue weight to his criminal and immigration history and failed to consider unwarranted sentencing disparities. The court did
not abuse its disc retion. See Gall v. United States , 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007). The court properly considered Urquidez

- Nava’s immigration history in determining whether to grant a fast

- track departure and what sentence to impose. See United States v. Rosales

- Gonzales , 801 F.3d 1177, 118 4 (9th Cir. 2015)

. The 18

- month sentence is substantively reasonable in light of the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) sentencing factors and the totality of the circumstances. See Gall , 552 U.S. at 51; see also United States v. Marcial

- Santiago , 447 F.3 d 715, 718

- 19 (9th Cir. 2006) (sentencing disparities that result from the fast

- track program are not unwarranted3 1 7

- 50274

and, as such, do not violate 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)(6))

. AFFIRMED.
#### In the Matter of the Arbitration between Film Producers Association of New York, Inc., Appellant, and Charles H. Wasserman, as President of Screen Directors International Guild, Respondent.

Order, dated April 15, 1960, denying petitioner’s motion to stay arbitration and granting respondent’s cross motion to compel arbitration unanimously reversed on the law and on the facts, with $20 costs and disbursements to petitioner-appellant, and the motion of petitioner-appellant to stay arbitration granted, with $10 costs, and the cross motion of petitioner-respondent to compel arbitration is denied. The respondent contends that the letter of February 25, 1960, to the American Arbitration Association constitutes the demand for arbitration and that it refers to revision of salary rates only. The letter points out that, more than 60 days prior to March 5, 1960, the Guild had made written request for the “reopening of negotiations for the revision of salary rates”; that negotiations were unsuccessful and the issue of revision is submitted to the Association. The written request referred to *“*Demands for Revised Wage Scales ” dated January 26, 1960, addressed to the appellant. The “Demands” were annexed also as Exhibit 5, to the affidavit of the executive secretary of respondent, filed in support of the cross motion to compel arbitration. Examination of Exhibit 5 reveals that substantially more than revision of salary rates is involved, and some of the demands lack specificity. The appellant is entitled to a list of specific demands within the language of the contract. From the demands listed they clearly exceed the scope of the arbitration provision and, by the language of the contract, are not arbitrable. *(Matter of General Elec. Co. [United Elec. Radio & Mach. Workers of Amer.J,*300 N. Y. 262; *Matter of New York Mirror [Potoker\,*5 A D 2d 423.) Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, McNally and Stevens, JJ.
<PAGE>   1



                                                                   Exhibit 10.47

                FIRST AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT DATED APRIL 6, 1998
                ------------------------------------------------

         THIS AGREEMENT MADE AND ENTERED INTO at Cleveland, Ohio this 28th day
of February, 2000, by and between FOREST CITY ENTERPRISES, INC., an Ohio
corporation, of Terminal Tower, 50 Public Square, Suite 1100, Cleveland, Ohio,
44113-2267, hereinafter referred to as "Company", and JAMES A. RATNER of 19750
Shaker Boulevard, Shaker Heights, OH 44122, hereinafter referred to as
"Employee".

         WHEREAS, the Company desires to grant to the Employee a benefit to his
Estate upon his death, and

         WHEREAS, the Compensation Committee of this Company has recommended
such benefit to be paid to his Estate, and

         NOW THEREFORE, it is agreed that in consideration of the Employee
working for the Company, it is agreed that:

         In consideration of his employment, if the Employee dies while in the
employ of the Company, the Company agrees to pay to the beneficiaries of the
Employee as stipulated in his Will, or designated by written notice to the
Company from the Employee during his lifetime, or designated by operation of law
if the Employee dies intestate, an amount equal to one hundred percent (100%) of
the salary paid to the Employee for the last calendar year prior to the death,
for a period of five (5) years following the decease of said Employee; said sum
to be payable in quarterly installments to said beneficiaries of said deceased
Employee.

         The parties hereto have set their hands the day and year first above
written.

                                                FOREST CITY ENTERPRISES, INC.

                                                By: Charles A. Ratner, President
                                                --------------------------------


                                                And: Thomas G. Smith, Secretary
                                                -------------------------------


                                                 JAMES A. RATNER, Employee
                                                 -------------------------
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JU LY 18, 2019

NO. 03

- 19

- 00298

- CV

Tutankhamun Holt, Appellant

v.

Michael J. Rogers, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 146TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY
BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUST ICES TRIANA, AND SMI TH
DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION

-- OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE

This is an appeal from the judgm ent signed by the tr i a l court on March 25, 2019. Having

reviewed the record , it appears that the C ourt lacks jurisdiction over the appeal. Therefore, the

C ourt dismisses the appeal for want of jurisdiction. Because appellant is indigent and unable to

pa y costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                      11,068,000
<SECURITIES>                                40,016,000
<RECEIVABLES>                              161,895,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 7,727,000
<INVENTORY>                                 81,230,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           319,585,000
<PP&E>                                     302,159,000
<DEPRECIATION>                             153,402,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             695,545,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      169,110,000
<BONDS>                                     66,520,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    47,205,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 308,106,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               695,545,000
<SALES>                                    169,662,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           172,746,000
<CGS>                                       63,415,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              157,184,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,266,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             15,562,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 6,069,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          9,493,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 9,493,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .21
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.0

  Written Statement of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
                          Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we, the undersigned Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Cal-Maine Foods Inc. (the
"Company"), hereby certify, based on their knowledge, that the Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended August 30, 2003 (the "Report")
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Fred R. Adams, Jr.
-------------------------------------------------
Fred R. Adams, Jr.
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer


/s/ Bobby J. Raines
-------------------------------------------------
Bobby J. Raines
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary


Date: October 6, 2003
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

)

)

)

) Civil Action No. 12-cv-03395

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

---------------)

MARVIN H. MAURRAS REVOCABLE

TRUST, YONGQIAN ZHAO, and SUSAN

CHAGNON, Derivatively on Behalf of

ACCRETIVE HEALTH, INC.

Plaintiff,

v.

EDGAR M. BRONFMAN JR., MICHAEL

CLINE, STEVENN. KAPLAN, STANLEY

N. LOGAN, DENIS J. NA YDEN, ARTHUR

H. SPIEGEL, III, MARY A. TOLAN, and

MARK A. WOLFSON,

Defendants,

and

ACCRETIVE HEALTH, INC.

Nominal Defendant.

NOTICE OF MOTION

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on Thursday, October 25, 2012, at 9:00 a.m. or as soon

thereafter as counsel may be heard, counsel for Plaintiff shall appear before the Honorable Gary

Feinerman in Room 1725 of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois,

Everett McKinley Dirksen Building, 219 S. Dearborn, Chicago, Illinois, and then and there

present Plaintiffs' Unopposed Motion for Entry of Leadership Structure Order, a copy of

which is hereby served upon you.

Case: 1:12-cv-03395 Document #: 63 Filed: 10/22/12 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:1206
Dated: October 22,2012 By: lsi Amy E. Keller

Edward A. Wallace

Amy E. Keller

Wexler Wallace LLP

55 W. Monroe Street, Suite 3300

Chicago, IL 60603

(312) 346-2222 - Telephone

(312) 346-0022 - Facsimile

Counsel for Plaintiff Marvin H. Maurras

Revocable Trust

Case: 1:12-cv-03395 Document #: 63 Filed: 10/22/12 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:1207
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that I caused a copy of the foregoing Notice of Motion to be filed

electronically via the Court's electronic filing system. Those attorneys who are registered with

the Court's electronic filing system may access these filings through the Court's system, and

notice of these filings will be sent to these parties by operation of the Court's electronic filing

system. Those attorneys not registered with the Court's electronic filing system will be served

by electronic mail this 22nd day of October, 2012.

lsi Amy E. Keller

Case: 1:12-cv-03395 Document #: 63 Filed: 10/22/12 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:1208