alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### 2052.216-70 Level of effort.

As prescribed at 2016.307-70(a) the contracting officer shall insert the following provision in solicitations for negotiated procurements containing labor costs other than maintenance services, to be awarded on a cost reimbursement, cost sharing, cost-plus-award-fee, cost-plus-fixed-fee, time and materials, or labor hours basis.

# Level of Effort (JAN 1993)

The NRC's estimate of the total effort for this project is approximately * professional and * clerical staff-years for the duration of this contract. This information is advisory and is not to be considered as the sole basis for the development of the staffing plan. For the purposes of the Government estimate, 2000 hours constitute a staff year.

*To be incorporated into any resultant contract.

(End of provision)
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****    - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский 

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

        - Student Loans
        - Grants
        - Laws
        - Data

# Federal Register Documents

# Federal Register Documents

## Recent Federal Register Notices
Appeal No. 74-335.

#### Anthony P. Zifcak *et ux. v.*Greater Woonsocket Board of Realtors, Inc.

*Laurent C. Bilodeau,*for plaintiffs. *Zimmerman, Roszkowski & Brenner, Gerald M. Brenner,*for defendant.

Motion of plaintiffs to affirm the judgment of the Superior Court pursuant to Rule 16(g) is denied.

Doris, J. not participating.
U.S. Dept Commerce/NOAA/NMFS/NWFSC/PublicationsNOAA Tech Memo NMFS NWFSC-8: Contaminant Exposure in Juvenile Salmon (cont): Figure 6 
Table of Contents
#### Lawrence Kaye Furs, Inc., Appellant, v Clemons Realty Corporation et al., Respondents.

— Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on November 6, 1978, unanimously affirmed on the opinion of Egeth, J. Respondents shall recover of appellant $75 costs and disbursements of this appeal. No opinion. Concur — Fein, J. P., Sullivan, Lane, Markewich and Silverman, JJ.
1216.505 Ordering. ( b ) ( 8 ) *Task-order and delivery-order ombudsman.* Unless otherwise designated by the Head of the Operating Administration, the Advocate for Competition for the Operating Administration (OA) is designated as the OA Task and Delivery Order Ombudsman. If any corrective action is needed after reviewing complaints from contractors on task and delivery order contracts, the OA Ombudsman shall provide a written determination of such action to the contracting officer. Issues that cannot be resolved within the OA shall be forwarded to the DOT Task and Delivery Order Ombudsman for review and resolution. The DOT Task and Delivery Order Ombudsman is located in the Office of the Senior Procurement Executive.
#### Jacob Leventhal, Respondent, v. Frances Leventhal, Appellant, et al., Defendant.

Motion by respondent to dismiss appeal and to vacate stay, denied on condition that appellant shall perfect the appeal and be ready to argue or submit it at the September Term, beginning September 10, 1962; appeal ordered on the calendar for said term. The record and appellant’s brief are directed to be filed and served on or before July 16, 1962. Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 28 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.Con.Res.28
                                      Agreed to November 2, 2017        

                     One Hundred Fifteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
          the third day of January, two thousand and seventeen

                          Concurrent Resolution

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That in the enrollment of the bill S. 782, the Secretary of the Senate 
shall make the following corrections:
        (1) In section 2, strike ``42 U.S.C. 17601 et seq.'' and insert 
    ``34 U.S.C. 21101 et seq.''.
        (2) In section 2, strike ``42 U.S.C. 17617(a)(10)'' and insert 
    ``34 U.S.C. 21117(a)(10)''.
Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.
Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.
```
#### ROSS v. NILES et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.

June 22, 1903.)

1. Attorneys—Liability for Services Rendered—Evidence—Sufficiency.

In an action to recover for services rendered as an expert on values in street opening' proceedings, wherein defendants appeared as attorneys for the property owners, evidence considered, and *held*sufficient to support a verdict for plaintiff on the theory that defendants had such an interest in the proceedings as to render them personally liable, and that the principals were undisclosed.

Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of the Bronx, Second District.

Action by John R. Ross against William W. Niles and another. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendants appeal. Affirmed.

Argued before FREEDMAN, P. J., and GILDERSLEEVE and MacLEAN, JJ.

John J. Cunneen, for appellants.

Fred. Cyrus Leubuscher, for respondent.

*143MacLEAN, J.

In this action, brought to recover the reasonable value of services rendered by plaintiff as an expert on values in street opening proceeding, wherein the defendants, who are attorneys at law, and in partnership, appeared for the property owners, evidence was given of employment by the first-named defendant of the circumstances of the engagement, of the services rendered, and their value, and some evidence tending to show that the employment was by the defendant Niles for himself upon his personal promise of compensation; also that, as to some of the parcels at least, the plaintiff was not unable to ascertain their ownership; and, further, that the services were for the benefit of the partnership. Concerning each of these matters the evidence was such as to warrant the jury in finding for either party. A letter written by the defendant Niles, especially if taken with the statement attributed to him, would imply that he had undertaken the proceedings on behalf, it is true, of the owners of the property, but under such circumstances that the procuring and submission of evidence relating to values was something for which he was personally to, and promised to, pay—an inference supported by the well-known fact that proceedings of this sort are often, if not commonly, undertaken under arrangements contingent upon success, the attorneys stipulating to bear all the expenses, and look for their compensation and reimbursement solely from the amount of the award. It was not shown by the defendants, nor is it to be inferred from the evidence, that the names of the principals for whom they were acting were disclosed to the plaintiff, or that he had actual knowledge of their names, so as to absolve the agents from the liability assumed by them.

Judgment should be affirmed, with costs. All concur.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, December 30, 2019. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, December 30, 2019 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A20D0202. PARAMOUNT CAPITAL INVESTMENTS, LLC v. APEX BANK .
Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: 2017GC04051
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         689,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               17,210,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   893,000
<INVENTORY>                                  8,631,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            28,640,000
<PP&E>                                      27,775,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              12,602,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              68,339,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        9,177,000
<BONDS>                                     11,774,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       153,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  45,433,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                68,339,000
<SALES>                                     55,584,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            55,584,000
<CGS>                                       29,400,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               29,400,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            18,380,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             617,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              7,206,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 2,738,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          4,468,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 4,468,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .56
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .54


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 15 (Tuesday, January 26, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 7092]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-01690]



[[Page 7092]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The public portions of the applications listed below, as well as 
other related filings required by the Board, if any, are available for 
immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank(s) indicated below and 
at the offices of the Board of Governors. This information may also be 
obtained on an expedited basis, upon request, by contacting the 
appropriate Federal Reserve Bank and from the Board's Freedom of 
Information Office at https://www.federalreserve.gov/foia/request.htm. 
Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards 
enumerated in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)).
    Comments regarding each of these applications must be received at 
the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors, 
Ann E. Misback, Secretary of the Board, 20th Street and Constitution 
Avenue NW, Washington DC 20551-0001, not later than February 25, 2021.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco (Sebastian Astrada, 
Director, Applications) 101 Market Street, San Francisco, California 
94105-1579: 1. St. Laurent Investments LLC, Vancouver, Washington; to 
become a bank holding company by acquiring People's Bank of Commerce, 
Medford, Oregon.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, January 21, 
2021.
Michele Taylor Fennell,
Deputy Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2021-01690 Filed 1-25-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
Issue Papers 1 and 2

· Evidence Standard-Clear and Convincing Vs. Preponderance

· Statute of Limitations 

· increase statute of limitations in exchange for clear and convincing 

· Lack of affirmative defenses

· Time limit on Secretary re-opening a claim 

· Minimum Threshold for consideration

· Voluntary Claim Resolution Process

· ED specifies the mediator the institution pays for mediation 

· Intent Standard List

· Financial Harm List

· Appropriate role for State law

· Reckless disregard for the truth

· Delete “reckless”

Issue Paper 3

· Address arbitration in issue 3-“arbitral” 

· Separate Financial Responsibility 

Issue Paper 4

· Authority to regulate on issue (ED should bar mandatory pre dispute arbitration Vs. ED has no authority in this area)

Issue Paper 6

· Absence of knowledge qualifier for H.S. enrollment
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

MARIA LUIS and LUCY GOMEZ, )

)

Plaintiffs, ) No. 1:12-cv-2922

)

v. )

)

SMITH PARTNERS & ASSOCIATES, LTD., )

COYA SMITH, and ANDY HORN, )

)

Defendants. )

NOTICE OF MOTION

TO: Attorneys of Record

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on the January 14, 2013, at 9:00 a.m., or as soon thereafter

as this motion may be heard, I shall appear before the Honorable Judge Gary Feinerman or any

Judge sitting in his stead, in the courtroom usually occupied by him in Room 1725 at the

courthouse located at 219 S. Dearborn, Chicago, Illinois, and present the attached DEFENDANTS

SMITH PARTNERS & ASSOCIATES, LTD., COYA SMITH AND ANDY HORN’S MOTION AND

SUPPORTING MEMORANDUM TO COMPEL PLAINTIFFS TO PRODUCE DOCUMENTS AND FOR

SANCTIONS, a copy of which has been served (via ECF filing) today.

Respectfully submitted,

Dated: January 9, 2013 /s/ Newton C. Marshall

Newton C. Marshall

Newton C. Marshall

Michelle M. Blum

Karbal, Cohen, Economou,

Silk & Dunne, LLC

150 S. Wacker Drive, Suite 1700

Chicago, IL 60606

312.431.3700

Case: 1:12-cv-02922 Document #: 47 Filed: 01/09/13 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:354
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, Newton C. Marshall, an attorney of record in this matter, hereby state that on January

9, 2013, I electronically filed the foregoing Notice of Motion and using the CM/ECF SYSTEM,

which will send notification to all attorneys of record on this the 9th day of January, 2013.

By: /s/ Newton C. Marshall

Attorneys for Smith Partners &

Associates, Ltd., Smith REO Properties,

Coya Smith and Andy Horn

Newton C. Marshall (ARDC No. 6209427)

Michelle M. Blum (ARDC No.: 6295921)

Karbal, Cohen, Economou, Silk & Dunne, LLC

150 S. Wacker Drive, Suite 1700

Chicago, IL 60606

312.431.3700

Case: 1:12-cv-02922 Document #: 47 Filed: 01/09/13 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:355
- Board members, district administrators, and the superintendent recognize the urgency of the problem of unlawful harassment and hate crime, identify people and agencies that can help them develop effective prevention and response strategies, and compile a library of useful materials 
- School officials select personnel to work on creating an effective anti-harassment program in consultation with parents, students, and community groups 
- Compliance coordinators are appointed and trained 
- School personnel assess the school climate to determine the prevalence and types of harassment that may exist and the potential for hate-motivated violence 
- School district adopts a written anti-harassment policy or reviews and revises existing policies for accuracy, clarity and legal compliance; the policy is clearly communicated to all members of the school community; and school personnel and students are held accountable for their actions 
- School district develops a formal grievance procedure and takes steps to make sure it is working properly 
- Instructional personnel use or supplement the district's curriculum and pedagogical strategies to foster respect and appreciation for diversity 
- School sites institute, improve, or expand age appropriate student activities to prevent or reduce prejudice and conflict 
- School district and individual school sites institute specific measures to respond immediately and effectively when harassment occurs to stop the harassment and prevent recurrence 
- School officials flexibly apply response mechanisms to both the victim and the perpetrator, taking into account the parties' ages and the context of the behavior 
- School personnel continually monitor the school climate and promptly address problems that could lead to harassment or violence or that indicate that harassment could be occurring 
- Appropriate school officials become familiar with pertinent civil and criminal laws at the state, local, and federal levels, so that they are able to recognize possible civil rights violations, hate crimes and other criminal acts 
- Schools develop guidelines and procedures for collaboration with law enforcement officials, make appropriate referrals to outside agencies, and designate liaison personnel 
- Crisis intervention plans are in place to minimize the possibility of violence or disruption of the educational process 
- District-level personnel and individual school sites form continuing partnerships with parents and the community to prevent hate crimes and harassing behaviors 
- Staff training and professional development programs support the district's anti-harassment efforts 
- All harassment incidents are carefully documented and incidents are reported to outside authorities as required 
- District regularly assesses the effectiveness of its anti-harassment efforts 

Source: Protecting Students from Harassment and Hate Crime, A Guide for Schools, January 1999

Top
THE SECRETARY OF EDUCATION

WASHINGTON, DC 20202

TO: Executive Director of the White House Initiative on Advancing Educational Equity, 

Excellence, and Economic Opportunity for Hispanics

FROM: The Secretary

SUBJECT: Authority to Designate a Department Employee to Serve as the Designated Federal 

Officer for the Presidential Advisory Commission on Advancing Educational 

Equity, Excellence, and Economic Opportunity for Hispanics 

I. DELEGATION

By the authority vested in me by Section 412 of the Department of Education Organization Act, 20 

U.S.C. § 3472, I hereby delegate to you, or anyone serving for you in an acting capacity or 

delegated to perform the functions and duties of your position, the authority to designate a 

Department employee to serve as and carry out the duties of the Designated Federal Officer (DFO) 

for the Presidential Advisory Commission on Advancing Educational Equity, Excellence, and 

Economic Opportunity for Hispanics as set forth in 41 C.F.R. §§ 102-3.25 (definition of the term 

“Designated Federal Officer”), 102-3.105(i), and 102-3.120 and Sections 1009(e) and (f) of 5 

U.S.C. Chapter 10 (Federal Advisory Committees).

Unless otherwise noted in future delegations of authority, amendments to the existing authorities 

delegated herein are included within the scope of this delegation. 

II. RESERVATIONS

None. 

III. REDELEGATION

Subject to the requirements of law, you may redelegate any of the authority delegated to you in 

this delegation and authorize further redelegation. Any redelegation must be done in accordance 

with the Administrative Communications System directive, ACSD-OFO-015, Delegation of 

Authority, dated August 26, 2016. 

IV. CERTIFICATION AND EFFECTIVE DATE 

This delegation is effective upon certification by the Department's Principal Delegations Control 

Officer. I ratify actions within the scope of this delegation taken by you prior to the date of 

certification.

___________/s___________ 

Miguel A. Cardona, Ed.D. 
OGC Clearance: /s/ Lauren Friedrich, 02/08/2023

Date Certified: 2/15/23

Control Number: EA/EA2/195

Delegations Control Officer: Jim Clemmens
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Arthur Fessia, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Magistrate’s Court of the City of New York, Borough of Queens, sitting as a Court of Special Sessions of the City of New York, rendered April 15, 1960, convicting him, after trial, of book-making, in violation of section 986 of the Penal Law, and sentencing him to pay a fine of $100, or, in default of payment, imprisonment not to exceed 10 days, and, in addition, committing him to the workhouse for three days. Judgment affirmed. No opinion. Beldock, Acting P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Pette, JJ., concur.
NO. 07-10-00109-CV 

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

AT AMARILLO 

PANEL D 

NOVEMBER 28, 2011 

HAROLD F. EGGERS, JR., APPELLANT 

v. 

JOHN TOWNES VAN ZANDT, II, WILLIAM VINCENT VAN 

ZANDT, K. B. V. Z., A MINOR, BY AND THROUGH HER 

NEXT FRIEND, JEANENE VAN ZANDT, JEANENE VAN 

ZANDT AND TVZ RECORDS, LLC, APPELLEES 

 FROM THE 345TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY; 

NO. D-1GN-06-001169; HONORABLE GISELA D. TRIANA-DOYAL, JUDGE 

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PIRTLE, JJ. 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Appellant Harold F. Eggers, Jr. has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. No 

decision of this court having been delivered to date, we grant the motion. Accordingly, 

the appeal is dismissed. Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1). No motion for rehearing will be 

entertained and our mandate will issue forthwith. 

 James T. Campbell 

 Justice
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES 

July 15, 2020 

Honorable Mark Johnson 

Superintendent of Public Instruction 

North Carolina Department of Public Instruction 

6301 Mail Service Center 

Raleigh, North Carolina 27699 

mark.johnson@dpi.nc.gov 

Dear Superintendent Johnson: 

This letter grants final approval under Section 421(b) of the General Education Provisions Act 

for grant awards H027A180092 and H173A180096. 

The Department received your June 19, 2020 request on behalf of North Carolina Department of

Public Instruction for a waiver extending the period of availability for Federal fiscal year (FFY) 

2018 Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) Part B grant award funds. 

With this approval, the FFY 2018 IDEA Part B grant award funds will be available for obligation 

through September 30, 2021 and may be liquidated through December 30, 2021. 

Please contact your Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP) State Lead, Lynne Fairfax, at

Lynne.Fairfax@ed.gov if you have any questions. 

Sincerely, 

/s/

Mark Schultz 

Commissioner, Rehabilitation Services Administration.

Delegated the authority to perform the functions and duties 

of the Assistant Secretary for the Office of Special 

Education and Rehabilitative Services.

cc: State Director 

400 MARYLAND AVE. S.W., WASHINGTON, DC 20202-2600 

www.ed.gov 

The Department of Education’s mission is to promote student achievement and preparation for global competitiveness 

by fostering educational excellence and ensuring equal access.