alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 4.6


                        MODIFICATION OF COVERTIBLE NOTE

     This Modification of Convertible Note ("Modification") modifies certain
terms of that certain Convertible Note of American TeleSource International,
Inc., a Texas corporation, dated March 17, 1997, in the principal amount of
$___________, payable to ________________(the "Note"). Capitalized terms used in
this Modification have the meanings assigned to them in the Note.

     For good and valuable consideration, Payee agrees as follows:

     1.   Accrued interest on the unpaid principal amount of the Note shall not
          be due and payable until the Maturity Date (subject to prepayment as
          provided in Section 2 of the Note).

     2.   Payee represents to Maker that Payee has not transferred the Note or
          any interest in the Note to any other person and that this
          Modification is binding upon Payee and Payee's successors and assigns.

     3.   The Note, as modified, is in full force and effect.

     4.   This Modification is made pursuant to Section 5 of the Note. Subject
          to the agreement of the holders of at least 80% of the aggregate
          unpaid principal amounts of the Convertible Notes outstanding, accrued
          interest on the unpaid principal amount of each Convertible Note,
          whether or not the holder thereof consented to such modification,
          shall not be due and payable until the Maturity Date (subject to
          prepayment as provided in Section 2 of the Convertible Note).


     This Modification has been signed as of ________________, 1997, by the
Payee named below.


-----------------------------------
[Name of Holder--natural person]


[Name of Holder--corporation]

By:
   --------------------------------
Name:
     ------------------------------
Title:
      -----------------------------
19.804-1 Agency evaluation. In determining the extent to which a requirement should be offered in support of the 8(a) program, the agency should evaluate— ( a ) Current and future plans to acquire the specific items or work that 8(a) participants are seeking to provide, identified in terms of— ( 1 ) Estimated quantities of the supplies or services required or the estimated number of construction projects planned;
( 2 ) Length of contract, including option periods (see 19.812(d)); and
( 3 ) Performance or delivery requirements, including— ( i ) Required monthly production rates, when applicable; and
( ii ) For construction, the geographical location where work is to be performed;
( b ) The impact of any delay in delivery;
( c ) Whether the items or work have previously been acquired using small business set-asides, and the date the items or work were acquired;
( d ) Problems encountered in previous acquisitions of the items or work from the 8(a) participants or other contractors; and
( e ) Any other pertinent information about known 8(a) participants, the items, or the work. This includes any information concerning the participants' products or capabilities. When necessary, the contracting agency shall make an independent review of the factors in 19.803(a) and other aspects of the participants' capabilities which would ensure the satisfactory performance of the requirement being considered for commitment to the 8(a) program.
[82 FR 4727, Jan. 13, 2017, as amended at 88 FR 9738, Feb. 14, 2023]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6.3.2

Eastern Division

Jeff Foster

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:12−cv−03130

Honorable Mary M. Rowland

PNC BANK NA

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Tuesday, June 2, 2020:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Mary M. Rowland: Counter−Plaintiff,PNC

Bank, National Association's motion to appoint selling officer [194] is granted. Enter

JUDGMENT OF FORECLOSURE AND SALE. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice.

(dm, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:12-cv-03130 Document #: 207 Filed: 06/02/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:4216
<PAGE>
<PAGE>
                                                           EXHIBIT 10(j)
GOLDEN AMERICAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
                            SURPLUS NOTE

Golden American Life Insurance Company agrees to pay ING America
Insurance Holdings, Inc. a Delaware corporation, the sum of $75 million
($75,000,000.00) plus interest at the rate of 7.75%  per annum from the
date hereof, September 30, 1999 until paid.  In any event, this note
will mature on September 29, 2029.

This Surplus Note and accrued interest thereon shall be subordinate to
payments due to policyholders, claimant and beneficiary claims, as well
as debts owed to all other classes of debtors, other than surplus note
holders, of Golden American Life Insurance Company in the event of (a)
the institution of bankruptcy, reorganization, insolvency or
liquidation proceedings by or against Golden American Life Insurance
Company, or (b) the appointment of a Trustee, receiver or other
Conservator for a substantial part of Golden American Life Insurance
Company properties.

Any payments made shall first apply to accrued interest, and the
balance of such payment shall apply to reduce the principal of this
Note.

Any payment of principal and/or interest made shall be subject to the
prior approval of the Delaware Insurance Commissioner.  If the
Commissioner has not approved payment of principal to retire the note
prior to its maturity date, the maturity date will be automatically
extended until such time as the Commissioner authorizes payment of the
final balance of principal.

Golden American Life Insurance Company hereby waives presentment and
notice of dishonor.

In witness whereof, Golden American Life Insurance Company has caused
this Note to be executed and delivered.


                                GOLDEN AMERICAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

                                By: /s/ Stephen J. Preston
                                   --------------------------------
                                     Stephen J. Preston, Executive
                                         Vice President


Attest by:

/s/ David L. Jacobson
--------------------------
David L. Jacobson
Senior Vice President and
    Assistant Secretary

<PAGE>
<PAGE>
1406.501 Requirement. ( a ) The competition advocate for DOI is located within PAM's staff. Applicable correspondence should be addressed to PAM, Attention: Competition Advocate.
( b ) Competition Advocates for each bureau and office shall be as designated by the CAO-AS/PMB.
#### Langdale *v.*Bowden & Company.

Lumpkin, J.

1. Suit was brought to recover certain personal property. The defendant, denied that the property belonged to the plaintiffs, and alleged that it was agreed to be sold by the defendant to the plaintiffs on certain conditions, which were not complied with, and the sale was never consummated. The plaintiffs introduced evidence to show that they had bought the property from the defendant for a stated amount, a part of which was to be paid in cash, and their notes were to be given for deferred payments, and that they had lawfully received possession and had tendered’ to the defendant the cash payment and the notes as agreed, but he had refused to receive them and had wrongfully retaken possession of the property by force. *Held,*that in such case evidence that the purchasers (the plaintiffs) tendered the cash payment and notes was admissible as tending to show their right to the property, without any formal pleading of a tender.

*325January 23, 1913.

Trover. Before Judge Parker. Clinch superior court. September 2, 1911.

*E. W. Edwards*and *B. G. Dickerson,*for plaintiff in error.

*8. G. Townsend*and *E. K.*Wilcox, contra.

2. In an' action to recover personal property, usually termed trover, under the statute, the plaintiff is not entitled to recover both the highest proved value at any time between the conversion and the trial and also hire. A charge that he can' so recover is erroneous. *Jaques*v. *Stewart,*81 *Ga.*81 (6 S. E. 815).

3. In view of the character of the case, and of the evidence, there was no error in the announcement of the presiding judge that he would not charge in regard to a timber contract between the defendant and a third person, or in not charging in regard to it as an element of set-off, in ease the plaintiffs obtained a verdict in the trover suit to recover a sawmill and appurtenances.

4. The portion of the charge to which exception', was taken on the ground that it contained an intimation of opinion was not amenable to that criticism.

5. An error in entering up a judgment, by reciting that it should be at eight instead of seven per cent, interest, is not a proper ground of. a motion for a new trial. Such action might furnish ground for direct exception, motion to amend, or some other appropriate remedy; but it would be no cause for trying the case again before a. jury.

*Judgment reversed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
#### 19.1302 [Reserved]
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 14 (Monday, January 25, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 6893]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-01443]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences; Notice of 
Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Environmental Health 
Sciences Special Emphasis Panel: R21 Mechanism for Time-Sensitive 
Research Opportunities in Environmental Health Sciences.
    Date: February 19, 2021.
    Time: 1:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, 
Keystone Building, 530 Davis Drive, Durham, NC 27709 (Virtual 
Meeting).
    Contact Person: Laura A. Thomas, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Branch, Division of Extramural Research 
and Training, National Institute of Environmental Health Science, 
Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, 984-287-3328, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5b373a2e293a752f3334363a281b353233753c342d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="6509041017044b110d0a080416250b0c0d4b020a13">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.115, 
Biometry and Risk Estimation--Health Risks from Environmental 
Exposures; 93.142, NIEHS Hazardous Waste Worker Health and Safety 
Training; 93.143, NIEHS Superfund Hazardous Substances--Basic 
Research and Education; 93.894, Resources and Manpower Development 
in the Environmental Health Sciences; 93.113, Biological Response to 
Environmental Health Hazards; 93.114, Applied Toxicological Research 
and Testing, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 15, 2021.
David W. Freeman,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2021-01443 Filed 1-22-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-12-00063-CV

WALLY YAMMINE AND NATALIE 

MEHAWEJ

APPELLANTS

V.

PROPERTY TAX FIX, LLC APPELLEE

------------

FROM THE 236TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

------------

On June 20, 2012, we notified appellants that their brief had not been filed 

as required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.6(a). See Tex. R. App. P. 

38.6(a). We stated we could dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless 

appellants or any party desiring to continue this appeal filed with the court within 

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
2

ten days a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 42.3. We have not received any response.

Because appellants’ brief has not been filed, we dismiss the appeal for 

want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).

Appellants shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: GABRIEL, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and DAUPHINOT, J.

DELIVERED: July 19, 2012
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 55 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

<DOC>
115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. CON. RES. 55

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That in recognition of the long and distinguished service rendered to 
the Nation and to the world, by the late George Herbert Walker Bush, 
the 41st President of the United States, his remains be permitted to 
lie in state in the rotunda of the Capitol from December 3, 2018 until 
December 5, 2018, and the Architect of the Capitol, under the direction 
of the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House 
of Representatives, shall take all necessary steps for the 
accomplishment of that purpose.

            Passed the Senate December 3, 2018.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
115th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                            S. CON. RES. 55

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

  Authorizing the use of the rotunda of the Capitol for the lying in 
   state of the remains of the late George Herbert Walker Bush, 41st 
                    President of the United States.
```
U.S. Dept Commerce/NOAA/NMFS/NWFSC/PublicationsAppendix Figure 4. General topography of the area at RKm 91.7 (Hoagy's Bar), Columbia River, selected for observation during the juvenile salmonid stranding survey, 1992 and 1993.
#### Irene Epstein, Respondent, v. Murray Epstein, Appellant.

In an action for a judical separation, the defendant husband appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated February 17, 1964, which: (a) denied his motion to vacate the plaintiff wife’s notice to examine him before trial as to his “financial condition and ability to pay alimony;” (b) directed him to submit to such examination; and (c) in effect, directed him to produce upon the examination the books and records specified in the notice, namely: for the five-year period 1959 to 1963 (inclusive), all his income tax returns; and for the six-year period 1959 to date, all his checkbook stubs, cancelled checks, stocks, bonds, records of income and expenses, ete., and “ any and all other books and records relating to” his “income and assets during that period.” Under the notice defendant is, in effect, required to submit to oral examination with respect to his finances for the past six years. Order modified on the facts and in the exercise of discretion as follows: (1) by striking out its three decretal paragraphs denying the defendant’s motion to vacate the notice and directing him to submit to examination pursuant to such notice; (2) by substituting therefor a paragraph granting the defendant’s motion in part and denying it in part, to the extent specified herein, and modifying plaintiff’s notice accordingly; and (3) by adding a paragraph directing the husband to submit to a pretrial examination as to his financial condition and ability to pay alimony; limiting such examination to the two-year period, January 1, 1962 to December 31; 1963, inclusive; and directing the husband to produce, for use upon such *800examination, his books and records showing all his income and expenditures for such two-year period, and his books and records showing all his capital assets and his present net worth. As so modified the order is affirmed, without costs. The examination shall proceed on 10 days’ written notice or at such time and place as the parties may mutually stipulate in writing. While under the circumstances here the Special Term properly exercised its discretion in granting an examination, in our opinion the examination as directed is too extensive. In order to determine the defendant’s present financial ability to pay alimony it is unnecessary to examine him for more than the recent two-year period; and it is sufficient if he produces such books and records as will reflect his actual income and expenses for such period, and as will show all his capital assets and his present net worth. Kleinfeld, Acting P. J., Brennan, Hill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
213.501 Special documentation requirements. ( a ) (i) *Sole source (including brand name) acquisitions.* For noncompetitive follow-on acquisitions of supplies or services previously awarded on a noncompetitive basis, include the additional documentation required by PGI 206.303-2(b)(i) and follow the procedures at PGI 206.304(a)(S-70).
( ii ) In accordance with section 888(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 (Pub. L. 114-328), the justification and approval addressed in FAR 13.501(a) is required in order to use brand name or equal descriptions or proprietary specifications and standards.
[80 FR 21657, Apr. 20, 2015, as amended at 84 FR 25192, May 31, 2019]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 5.0.3

Eastern Division

Theresa Monturano

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:12−cv−02507

Honorable Joan H. Lefkow

Eric P. Lefkofsky, et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Wednesday, June 6, 2012:

 MINUTE entry before Honorable Joan H. Lefkow:Rule 16 conference held.

Defendants to file motion to stay by 6/20/2012. Response by 7/11/2012. Reply by

7/18/2012. Ruling to issue by mail. Status hearing on the possibility of settlement set for

8/2/2012 at 8:30.Mailed notice(mad, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:12-cv-02507 Document #: 47 Filed: 06/06/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:350
U.S. FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE

Oxbow National Wildlife Refuge - Map 1 of 3

Walker Road - MacPherson Road Hunt Map

0 187.5 375 750 1,125 1,500

Meters

0 0.125 0.25 0.5 0.75 1

Miles

Legend

Parking

Refuge Boundary

Shotgun, archery and primitive firearms hunting for deer, turkey, ruffed grouse, gray squirrel, rabbit, and woodcock

Archery deer hunting, shotgun hunting for turkey, ruffed grouse, gray squirrel, rabbit, and woodcock

Archery hunting only for deer and turkey
On November 27, 2012, OCR resolved the portion  of a complaint against the Lower Merion School District that alleged discrimination  on the basis of race, due to a District redistricting plan that had divided  a neighborhood that is predominately African-American. OCR determined that this  allegation was decided on the merits by the Federal courts, including the  United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit Court, which affirmed a  District Court’s order.  The United  States Supreme Court also denied certiorari in this case. In its letter of  resolution, OCR noted that the Third Circuit Court of Appeals’ decision that a school  district may consider neighborhood racial demographics in drawing a student  assignment plan that promotes diversity is consistent with the Guidance issued  by OCR and the Department of Justice in December 2011. OCR quoted the Third  Circuit: “The Supreme Court and this Court have yet  to set forth any standard requiring the application of strict scrutiny  when decisionmakers have discussed race, but the school assignment plan neither  classifies on the basis of race nor has a discriminatory purpose. We hold that  the plan here passes constitutional muster because it does not select students  based on racial classifications, it does not use race to assign benefits or  burdens in the school assignment process, it does not apply the plan in a  discriminatory manner, and it does not have a racially discriminatory purpose. Strict scrutiny does not apply.”  
     ***Read    the Resolution Letter***PDF (124K)
Top  Last Modified: 01/15/2020
#### 1552.235-76 Treatment of Confidential Business Information (APR 1996).

As prescribed in 1535.007-70(c), insert the following clause:

# Treatment of Confidential Business Information (TSCA)(APR 1996)

(a) The Project Officer (PO) or his/her designee, after a written determination by the appropriate program office, may disclose confidential business information (CBI) to the Contractor necessary to carry out the work required under this contract. The Contractor agrees to use the CBI only under the following conditions:

(1) The Contractor and Contractor's employees shall (i) use the CBI only for the purposes of carrying out the work required by the contract; (ii) not disclose the information to anyone other than properly cleared EPA employees without the prior written approval of the Assistant General Counsel for Information Law or his/her designee; and (iii) return the CBI to the PO or his/her designee, whenever the information is no longer required by the Contractor for performance of the work required by the contract, or upon completion of the contract.

(2) The Contractor shall obtain a written agreement to honor the above limitations from each of the Contractor's employees who will have access to the information before the employee is allowed access.

(3) The Contractor agrees that these contract conditions concerning the use and disclosure of CBI are included for the benefit of, and shall be enforceable by, both EPA and any affected businesses having a proprietary interest in the information.

(4) The Contractor shall not use any CBI supplied by EPA or obtained during performance hereunder to compete with any business to which the CBI relates.

(b) The Contractor agrees to obtain the written consent of the CO, after a written determination by the appropriate program office, prior to entering into any subcontract that will involve the disclosure of CBI by the Contractor to the subcontractor. The Contractor agrees to include this clause, including this paragraph (b), in all subcontracts awarded pursuant to this contract that require the furnishing of CBI to the subcontractor.

(End of clause)

[61 FR 14266, Apr. 1, 1996, as amended at 61 FR 57339, Nov. 6, 1996]