alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION

18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection
with the Quarterly Report of Chase General Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
the undersigned, Barry M. Yantis, President and Chief Executive Officer of Chase General Corporation, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Barry M. Yantis

---

Barry M. Yantis

President and Chief Executive Officer



Dated: November 11, 2005
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Joseph M. Squeri, the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Federal Realty Investment Trust (the Company), has executed this certification in connection with the filing with the Securities and
Exchange Commission of the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008 (the Report). The undersigned hereby certifies that:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|            |  |  |  |                                                                
|----------- |  |  |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------
|            |  | 
|May 7, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/ JOSEPH M. SQUERI                                           
|            |  |  |  | Joseph M. Squeri,                                              
|            |  |  |  | Executive Vice President and                                   
|            |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer (Principal FinancialAccounting Officer)
UNITED STATES ENVIRONM ENTAL PROTECTION

AGENCY

 NATIONAL VEHICLE FUELS EMISSIONS LABORATORY

 Ann Arbor, MI 48105

 O ffice of Air and Radiation 

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Meeting with GM Representatives July 23, 2009 and October 16, 2009

FROM: Ed Nam

Director Light Duty Onroad Center

TO: Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0472

This memorandum documents meetings held on July 23, 2009 and October 16, 2009

between Barbara Kiss and Nathan Wilmont of General Motors and Ed Nam, Ben Ellies, 

Dave Ganss, and Jeff Cherry of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). We

discussed the results of Ricardo Modeling as compared to internal General Motors 

modeling of various technologies as applied to light duty pickup trucks. General Motors

shared confidential data during the discussion.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dynamic MaterialsCorporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30,2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Richard A. Santa, Vice President and Chief Financial Officerof the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(i)             The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(ii)          The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

October 31, 2008

 

 
|   | /s/ Richard  A. Santa                              |   |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Richard A.  Santa                                  |
|   | Senior Vice  President and Chief Financial Officer |
|   | of Dynamic  Materials Corporation                  |

 

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to Dynamic Materials Corporation and will be retained by DynamicMaterials Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.

 

1

----
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection  with the Annual  Report of NT Media  Corporation  of  California,
Inc., (the "Registrant") on Form 10-KSB for the year ending December 31, 2006 as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  I, Ali Moussavi,  Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial
Officer of the Registrant,  certify to the best of my knowledge,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  ss..1350,  as adopted pursuant to ss..906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d)
of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Registrant.


Date: April 15, 2007

By: /s/ Ali Moussavi
    ----------------
    Ali Moussavi,
    Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer
#### 1852.245-79 Records and disposition reports for Government property with potential historic or significant real value.

As prescribed in 1845.107-70(j), insert the following clause.

# Records and Disposition Reports for Government Property With Potential Historic or Significant Real Value (JAN 2011)

(a) In addition to the property record data required by the clause at FAR 52.245-1, Government Property as incorporated in this contract, Contractor records of all Government property under this contract shall—

(1) Identify the projects or missions that used the items;

(2) Specifically identify items of flown property;

(3) When known, associate individual items of property used in space flight operations with the using astronaut(s); and

(4) Identify property used in test activity and, when known, the individuals who 0conducted the test.

(b) The Contractor shall include this information within item descriptions—

(1) On any Standard Form 1428, Inventory Schedule;

(2) In automated disposition systems;

(3) In any other disposition related reports; and

(4) In other requests for disposition instructions.

(c) The Contractor shall not remove NASA identification or markings from Government property prior to or during disposition without the advanced written approval of the Plant Clearance Officer.

(End of clause)

[76 FR 2006, Jan. 12, 2011]
19.502-5 Insufficient reasons for not setting aside an acquisition. None of the following is, in itself, sufficient cause for not setting aside an acquisition: ( a ) A large percentage of previous contracts for the required item(s) has been placed with small business concerns.
( b ) The item is on an established planning list under the Industrial Readiness Planning Program. However, a total small business set-aside shall not be made when the list contains a large business Planned Emergency Producer of the item(s) who has conveyed a desire to supply some or all of the required items.
( c ) The item is on a Qualified Products List. However, a total small business set-aside shall not be made if the list contains the products of large business unless none of the large businesses desires to participate in the acquisition.
( d ) A period of less than 30 days is available for receipt of offers.
( e ) The acquisition is classified.
( f ) Small business concerns are already receiving a fair proportion of the agency's contracts for supplies and services.
( g ) A class small business set-aside of the item or service has been made by another contracting activity.
( h ) A “brand name or equal” product description will be used in the solicitation.
[48 FR 42240, Sept. 19, 1989, as amended at 63 FR 70270, 70292, Dec. 18, 1998. Redesignated at 76 FR 68035, Nov. 2, 2011. Redesignated and amended at 85 FR 11762, Feb. 27, 2020]
205.301 General. ( a ) (S-70) *Synopsis of exceptions to domestic source requirements.* ( i ) In accordance with 10 U.S.C. 4862(k), contracting officers also must synopsize through the Governmentwide point of entry (*https://www.sam.gov*), awards exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold that are for the acquisition of any clothing, fiber, yarn, or fabric items described in 225.7002-1(a)(1)(ii) through (x), if— ( A ) The Secretary concerned has determined that domestic items are not available, in accordance with 225.7002-2(b); or
( B ) The acquisition is for chemical warfare protective clothing, and the contracting officer has determined that an exception to domestic source requirements applies because the acquisition furthers an agreement with a qualifying country, in accordance with 225.7002-2(n).
( ii ) The synopsis must be submitted in sufficient time to permit its publication not later than 7 days after contract award.
( iii ) In addition to the information otherwise required in a synopsis of contract award, the synopsis must include one of the following statements as applicable: ( A ) “The exception at DFARS 225.7002-2(b) applies to this acquisition, because the Secretary concerned has determined that items grown, reprocessed, reused, or produced in the United States cannot be acquired as and when needed in satisfactory quality and sufficient quantity at U.S. market prices.”
( B ) “The exception at DFARS 225.7002-2(n) applies to this acquisition, because the contracting officer has determined that this acquisition of chemical warfare protective clothing furthers an agreement with a qualifying country identified in DFARS 225.003(10).”
[71 FR 58536, Oct. 4, 2006, as amended at 74 FR 52895, Oct. 15, 2009; 74 FR 59914, Nov. 19, 2009; 80 FR 51749, Aug. 26, 2015; 87 FR 76990, Dec. 16, 2022; 88 FR 88533, Dec. 22, 2023]
203.904 Procedures for filing complaints. ( 1 ) Any employee of a contractor or subcontractor who believes that he or she has been discharged, demoted, or otherwise discriminated against contrary to the policy in 203.903 may file a complaint with the Inspector General of the Department of Defense.
( 2 ) A complaint may not be brought under this section more than three years after the date on which the alleged reprisal took place.
( 3 ) The complaint shall be signed and shall contain— ( i ) The name of the contractor;
( ii ) The contract number, if known; if not, a description reasonably sufficient to identify the contract(s) involved;
( iii ) The violation of law, rule, or regulation giving rise to the disclosure;
( iv ) The nature of the disclosure giving rise to the discriminatory act, including the party to whom the information was disclosed; and
( v ) The specific nature and date of the reprisal.
[58 FR 59853, Sept. 30, 2013, as amended at 79 FR 11337, Feb. 28, 2014]
208.7003-1 Assignments under integrated materiel management (IMM). ( a ) Acquire all items assigned for IMM from the IMM manager except— ( 1 ) Items purchased under circumstances of unusual and compelling urgency as defined in FAR 6.302-2. After such a purchase is made, the requiring activity must send one copy of the contract and a statement of the emergency to the IMM manager;
( 2 ) Items for which the IMM manager assigns a supply system code for local purchase or otherwise grants authority to purchase locally; or
( 3 ) When purchase by the requiring activity is in the best interest of the Government in terms of the combination of quality, timeliness, and cost that best meets the requirement. This exception does not apply to items— ( i ) Critical to the safe operation of a weapon system;
( ii ) With special security characteristics; or
( iii ) Which are dangerous (e.g., explosives, munitions).
( b ) Follow the procedures at PGI 208.7003-1(b) when an item assigned for IMM is to be acquired by the requiring department in accordance with paragraph (a)(3) of this subsection.
[60 FR 61593, Nov. 30, 1995, as amended at 64 FR 51075, Sept. 21, 1999; 64 FR 61031, Nov. 9, 1999; 71 FR 39004, July 11, 2006]
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

About EDCONTACTS

                    - Overview of the law
                    - Questions and answers on sex discrimination
                    - Sex discrimination regulation (Title IX)
                    - Title IX Coordinator Resources
                    - Sexual Harassment Resources
                    - Athletic Equity Resources
                    - Transgender and Gender-Nonconforming Students Resources
                    - Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) Resources

----

 

 Printable view

## How Do I Find...

          - Student loans, forgiveness
          - College accreditation
          - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
          - FERPA
          - FAFSA
          - 1098, tax forms

More >

## Information About...

          - Transforming Teaching
          - Family and Community Engagement
          - Early Learning

 

|  |
|--|
|  |
|  | Other Sites |  |
|  |

----

*Our mission*

Student Loans
Repaying LoansDefaulted LoansLoan ForgivenessLoan Servicers

Grants & Programs
Apply for Pell GrantsGrants ForecastApply for a GrantEligibility for Grants

Laws & Guidance
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)FERPACivil RightsNew IDEA Website

Data & Research
Education StatisticsPostsecondary Education DataED Data ExpressNation's Report CardWhat Works Clearinghouse

About Us
Contact UsED OfficesJobsPress ReleasesFAQsRecursos en españolBudget, PerformancePrivacy ProgramSubscribe to E-Mail Updates

----

          - Notices
          - FOIA
          - Privacy Policy
          - Accessibility
          - Security
          - Information quality
          - Inspector General
          - Whitehouse.gov
          - USA.gov
          - Benefits.gov
          - Regulations.gov
### §1201a. Repealed. Pub. L. 99–653, §5(b), formerly §5(a)(d), Nov. 14, 1986, 100 Stat. 3656, renumbered §5(b), Pub. L. 100–525, §8(d)(2), Oct. 24, 1988, 102 Stat. 2617

Section, Pub. L. 85–316, §8, Sept. 11, 1957, 71 Stat. 641, related to waiver of fingerprinting requirements for nonimmigrant aliens.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal applicable to applications for immigrant visas made, and visas issued, on or after Nov. 14, 1986, see section 23(b) of Pub. L. 99–653, set out as an Effective Date of 1986 Amendment note under section 1201 of this title.
Case: 1:12-cv-00772 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/03/12 Page 1 of 21 PageID #:1
Case: 1:12-cv-00772 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/03/12 Page 2 of 21 PageID #:2
Case: 1:12-cv-00772 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/03/12 Page 3 of 21 PageID #:3
Case: 1:12-cv-00772 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/03/12 Page 4 of 21 PageID #:4
Case: 1:12-cv-00772 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/03/12 Page 5 of 21 PageID #:5
Case: 1:12-cv-00772 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/03/12 Page 6 of 21 PageID #:6
Case: 1:12-cv-00772 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/03/12 Page 7 of 21 PageID #:7
Case: 1:12-cv-00772 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/03/12 Page 8 of 21 PageID #:8
Case: 1:12-cv-00772 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/03/12 Page 9 of 21 PageID #:9
Case: 1:12-cv-00772 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/03/12 Page 10 of 21 PageID #:10
Case: 1:12-cv-00772 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/03/12 Page 11 of 21 PageID #:11
Case: 1:12-cv-00772 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/03/12 Page 12 of 21 PageID #:12
Case: 1:12-cv-00772 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/03/12 Page 13 of 21 PageID #:13
Case: 1:12-cv-00772 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/03/12 Page 14 of 21 PageID #:14
Case: 1:12-cv-00772 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/03/12 Page 15 of 21 PageID #:15
Case: 1:12-cv-00772 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/03/12 Page 16 of 21 PageID #:16
Case: 1:12-cv-00772 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/03/12 Page 17 of 21 PageID #:17
Case: 1:12-cv-00772 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/03/12 Page 18 of 21 PageID #:18
Case: 1:12-cv-00772 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/03/12 Page 19 of 21 PageID #:19
Case: 1:12-cv-00772 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/03/12 Page 20 of 21 PageID #:20
Case: 1:12-cv-00772 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/03/12 Page 21 of 21 PageID #:21
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Clifton Chamberlayne, Appellant, v. W. Cecil Johnston, as Director of Dannemora State Hospital, Respondent.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Clinton County which dismissed petitioner’s application for a writ of habeas corpus. Upon the authority of *People ex rel. Brown*v. *Johnston*(9 N Y 2d 482) and the consent of the Attorney-General, the order is reversed, on the law and the facts, without costs, and the matter remitted to Special Term for a hearing to test relator’s sanity. Bergan, P. J., Gibson, Herlihy, Reynolds and Taylor, JJ., concur.
14.208 Amendment of invitation for bids. ( a ) If it becomes necessary to make changes in quantity, specifications, delivery schedules, opening dates, etc., or to correct a defective or ambiguous invitation, such changes shall be accomplished by amendment of the invitation for bids using Standard Form 30, Amendment of Solicitation/Modification of Contract. The fact that a change was mentioned at a pre-bid conference does not relieve the necessity for issuing an amendment. Amendments shall be sent, before the time for bid opening, to everyone to whom invitations have been furnished and shall be displayed in the bid room.
( b ) Before amending an invitation for bids, the contracting officer shall consider the period of time remaining until bid opening and the need to extend this period.
( c ) Any information given to a prospective bidder concerning an invitation for bids shall be furnished promptly to all other prospective bidders as an amendment to the invitation ( 1 ) if such information is necessary for bidders to submit bids or
( 2 ) if the lack of such information would be prejudicial to uninformed bidders. The information shall be furnished even though a pre-bid conference is held. No award shall be made on the invitation unless such amendment has been issued in sufficient time to permit all prospective bidders to consider such information in submitting or modifying their bids.
[48 FR 42171, Sept. 19, 1983, as amended at 81 FR 83098, Nov. 18, 2016]
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Leon Smith, Also Known as Leo Smith, Appellant.

The letter, dated October 19, 1964, from the appellant addressed to Honorable Marcus G. Christ, Associate Justice *925of this court, will be treated as a motion to vacate this court’s order of September 24, 1960 dismissing the appeal and to reinstate the appeal. The appeal is from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, rendered January 28, 1960. The motion is denied. The appeal was dismissed for lack of prosecution. Appellant now claims he was unaware of the fact that his retained attorney had neglected to prosecute the appeal and had withdrawn from the case. Such lack of personal knowledge by the appellant is not sufficient ground to vacate the dismissal of the appeal caused by the negligence of his attorney, whether such attorney be one retained by appellant (as in this case) or assigned by the court *(People*v. *Kling,*14 N Y 2d 571, affg. 19 A D 2d 750; *People*v. *Marchese,*14 N Y 2d 695, affg. 19 A D 2d 728). Beldoeb, P. J„ Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Brennan, JJ., concur.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. William R. Liss, Appellant.

Judgment of conviction unanimously affirmed. (Appeal from judgment of Erie County Court convicting defendant of the crime of murder, second degree.) Present — Williams, P. J., Goldman, Halpern, McClusky and Henry, JJ.
Case: 1:12-cv-01660 Document #: 3 Filed: 03/07/12 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:7
Case: 1:12-cv-01660 Document #: 3 Filed: 03/07/12 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:8
Case: 1:12-cv-01660 Document #: 3 Filed: 03/07/12 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:9
8040.5 09129/06 

### 9. Contacts. 

### With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed? OrganiZation Person Contacted 

### Date Response

-**i\atiltllulllus·m~·'~** Ail-craft**A~~od:ujon** Fli Colli 

### 7111/12



## -**Ut•t.i1m~ll** Airline A\snd;J!inn 7111/12**,\ir~raft** On ncn; &**l'ilut~ As~(oduti/111**  l{nlwr1 llal·l,man 7/i l/12 

# I**.-\irlint·~** rnr**Amcri~·a** 

# l.lm.' Whht• 7i! 1112

l'agr. A2·4