alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
23.2
 
 **CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**
 
 The Board
of Directors
 PhotoMedex,
Inc. and Subsidiaries:
 
 We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(Nos. 333-58450, 333-72580, 333-91926, 333-106605 and 333-120921) on Form S-3,
in the registration statements (Nos. 333-100609 and 333-121864) on Form S-4, and
in the registration statements (Nos. 333-30298 and 333-114181) on Form S-8 of
PhotoMedex, Inc. of our report dated February 18, 2004, except with respect to
the seventh paragraph of note 9, for which the date is March 10, 2004, with
respect to the consolidated balance sheets of PhotoMedex, Inc. and subsidiaries
as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for the years then ended, which
report appears in the December 31, 2003 annual report on Form 10-K of
PhotoMedex, Inc.
 
 Our
report with respect to the consolidated financial statements refers to the
adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, “Goodwill and
Other Intangible Assets,” as of January 1, 2002.
 
 /s/ KPMG
LLP
 
 Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania
 March 14,
2005
 
 
   E-23.2
> Independent School  District #761****(District) submitted an agreementto resolve a Title VI complaint alleging harassment and disproportionate disciplineof Somali students at Owatonna High School.  OCR and the Justice Department’sCivil Rights Division collaborated on the investigation and resolution with theDistrict.  Prior to the conclusion of the investigation, the District signeda Resolution Agreement in which it agreed to take all reasonable steps to ensurethat all students enrolled in the District are not subject to harassment or discriminationon the basis of race, color or national origin, and to respond promptly and appropriatelyto all reports of harassment. To that end, the District agreed to improve itspolicies and procedures concerning harassment and discipline as necessary tomake them effectively protect students from racial or national origin-based harassment.  Specifically,the District will (1) issue an anti-harassment statement to all District students,parents and staff; (2) conduct training of all District faculty, staff and studentson discrimination and harassment; (3) meet with high school Somali students todiscuss their concerns about harassment; (4) establish a working group of Districtpersonnel, students and parents to make recommendations regarding the effectivenessof the District’s anti-harassment program; (5) develop a District-wide monitoringprogram to assess the effectiveness of the district’s anti-harassment efforts;and (6) provide annual compliance reports to OCR and the Justice Department forthe next three years.  ***Read the Press Release***PDF (25K)***| Read the Resolution Letter***PDF (150K) ***| Read the Resolution Agreement***PDF (85K)

  

Top
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 233 (Tuesday, December 4, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 71793-71794]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-29033]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality

Notice of Senior Executive Service Performance Review Board 
Membership

    The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) announces the 
appointment of members to the AHRQ Senior Executive Service (SES) 
Performance Review Board (PRB). This action is being taken in 
accordance with 5 U.S.C. 4314(c)(4), which requires notice of 
appointment of members to performance review boards to be published in 
the Federal Register.

[[Page 71794]]

    Members of the PRB are appointed in a manner that will ensure 
consistency, stability and objectivity in the SES performance 
appraisals. The function of the PRB is to make recommendations to the 
Director, AHRQ, relating to the performance of senior executives in the 
Agency.
    The following persons will serve on the AHRQ SES Performance Review 
Board:

Irene Fraser
Stephen B. Cohen
William Munier
David Meyers
Michael Fitzmaurice
Phyllis Zucker
Mark Handelman
Jean Slutsky

    For further information about the AHRQ Performance Review Board, 
contact Ms. Alison Reinheimer, Office of Performance, Accountability, 
Resources, and Technology, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 
540 Gaither Road, Suite 4010, Rockville, Maryland 20850.

    Dated: November 26, 2012.
Carolyn M. Clancy,
Director, AHRQ.
[FR Doc. 2012-29033 Filed 12-3-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-90-M
```
Publications

Appendix Table A1. Short-terma tag loss for subyearling chinook salmon, 1991.

a Samples taken from the outfall pipe from marking trailer immediately after tagging.b NT = Number of fish passed through the tag detector which tested negative for a tag.c Number of fish sampled for tag loss.d "-" = data not available. 

Use your browser's BACK button to return to the text.

Table of Contents
<PAGE>
                                                                 EXHIBIT (10)(a)

[SUTHERLAND ASBILL & BRENNAN LLP LETTERHEAD]


                   CONSENT OF SUTHERLAND ASBILL & BRENNAN LLP



    We hereby consent to the reference to our name under the caption "Legal
Matters" in the Prospectus filed as part of Post-Effective Amendment No. 14 to
Form N-4 (File No. 33-45380) for ML of New York Variable Annuity Separate
Account B of ML Life Insurance Company of New York. In giving this consent, we
do not admit that we are in the category of persons whose consent is required
under Section 7 of the Securities Act of 1933.



<TABLE>
<S>                             <C>  <C>
                                     SUTHERLAND ASBILL & BRENNAN LLP

                                               /s/ KIMBERLY J. SMITH
                                     -----------------------------------------
                                              Kimberly J. Smith, Esq.
</TABLE>


Washington, D.C.

April 24, 2000
204.270-1 Policy. ( a ) The Electronic Data Access (EDA) system, an online repository for contractual instruments and supporting documents, is DoD's primary tool for electronic distribution of contract documents and contract data. Contract attachments shall be uploaded to EDA, except for contract attachments that are classified, are too sensitive for widespread distribution (*e.g.,* personally identifiable information and Privacy Act and Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, or cannot be practicably converted to electronic format (*e.g.,* samples, drawings, and models). Section J (or similar location when the Uniform Contract Format is not used) shall include the annotation “provided under separate cover” for any attachment not uploaded to EDA.
( b ) Agencies are responsible for ensuring the following when posting documents, including contractual instruments, to EDA— ( 1 ) The timely distribution of documents; and
( 2 ) That internal controls are in place to ensure that— ( i ) The electronic version of a contract document in EDA is an accurate representation of the contract; and
( ii ) The contract data in EDA is an accurate representation of the underlying contract.
[80 FR 58631, Sept. 30, 2015, as amended at 84 FR 48510, Sept. 13, 2019]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 5.0.3

Eastern Division

Christopher Langone

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:12−cv−02004

Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly

Ryan Olisar

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Wednesday, April 18, 2012:

 MINUTE entry before Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly: Initial status hearing is set

to 9:00 a.m. on 5/31/12 before Judge Kennelly, in Chambers, Room 2188. Parties are to

review and comply with Judge Kennelly's standing initial order, which may be found on

his web page, located at http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/home/Judges.aspx. Counsel for

plaintiff(s) are ordered to cause a copy of this order to be delivered forthwith to each

defendant in the same manner that summons has been or is being served on each

defendant. (mk)

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:12-cv-02004 Document #: 5 Filed: 04/18/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:32
|   | (1) | The      accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter      ended August 29, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of Section      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;  and |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the accompanying Report fairly presents, in all      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of      the Company. |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/  Fred R. Adams,      Jr.                 |   |
|--------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Fred      R. Adams, Jr.                                |   |
| Chairman      of the Board and Chief Executive Officer |   |

| /s/  Timothy A.      Dawson       |
|---------------------------------------------|
| Timothy      A. Dawson                      |
| Vice      President, Chief FinancialOfficer |

----
July 29 , 2014



### JUDGMENT


## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

TRAVOY RAMON HOLLIE , Appellant

NO. 14

- 12

- 01085

- CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

________________________________ This cause was heard on the transcripts of the record of the court below, and having inspected the record, the Court holds there was no error in the judgment requiring reversal, but there was error in the ju dgment as enter ed, which is cap able of reformation by this Court. Therefore, the judgment is MODIFIED to reflect court costs of $424. The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED as MODIFIED

. We further order this decision certified below for observance.
#### (A) The People of the State of New York v. Benjamin Inabinett. (B) The People of the State of New York v. Anthony Pollino.

[In each action] Motion to dismiss appeal denied. 'Motion for leave to appeal as a poor person granted to the extent -and on the terms and conditions contained in the order of this court filed herein. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Valente, Stevens, Eager and Steuer, JJ.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 /s/     Michael H. GoldbergMichael H. GoldbergPresident and Chief Executive OfficerMay 1, 2009/s/      Scott F. StephensScott F. StephensVice President and Chief Financial OfficerMay 1, 2009  E-3
#### In the Matter of White Plains Iron Works, Inc., Appellant, v. A. W. Stangl, Respondent.

In a proceeding by petitioner, White Plains Iron Works, Inc., a general contractor, to summarily vacate and discharge a mechanic’s *701lien on a public improvement, filed by respondent, A. W. Stangl, a subcontractor, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated January 10, 1962, which denied its application. The application was made on the ground that, while the notice of the lien as filed was acknowledged, it was not verified as required by section 12 of the Lien Law; hence, it was invalid. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld and Hill, JJ., concur; Brennan, J., not voting.
#### Klara Rosenberg, Respondent, v. Nadia Naishtut, Appellant.

In a negligence action, the defendant appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated December 17, 1963, as granted conditionally her motion to dismiss the complaint for lack of prosecution. *911Defendant contends that her motion should have been granted unconditionally. Order insofar as appealed from, reversed, without costs; defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint granted unconditionally; and complaint dismissed, without costs. Plaintiff failed to show either a reasonable excuse or justification for the delay of over four years in the prosecution of the action, or, by an affidavit of one having personal knowledge of the facts, that the action has merit. Under such circumstances, defendant’s motion should have been granted unconditionally. Beldock, P. J., Kleinfeld, Brennan, Hill and Rabin, JJ., concur.
{00054715.DOC; v. 1}

3771

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

DOCTOR JOHN DOE, et al., )

)

Plaintiff, )

) Case No. 11-cv-07814

)

)

GOOGLE, INC., ) Honorable Virginia M. Kendall 

)

Defendant. )

NOTICE OF DISMISSAL

NOW COMES the Plaintiffs, DOCTOR JOHN DOE, et al., through their counsel,

DAVID A. NOVOSELSKY and NOVOSELSKY LAW OFFICES, and for their Notice of 

Dismissal of all Plaintiffs claims against Defendant GOOGLE, INC. pursuant to Federal 

Rule of Civil Procedure 41 without prejudice and with each party to bear its own costs, 

states as follows:

On November 3, 2011 counsel for Plaintiffs received notice that this case was 

removed to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois from the 

Circuit Court of Cook County Law Division. 

Since Defendant Google, Inc. has not filed a dispositive motion and has not 

responded to the Complaint or counterclaimed against it as of the docket effective 3:45 pm 

on November 4, 2011, pursuant to FRCP 41 Plaintiffs may voluntarily dismiss their claims 

against Defendant Google, Inc.

WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs give Notice of their dismissal of all their claims against 

Defendant Google, Inc. without prejudice and with all parties to bear their own costs 

pursuant to FRCP 41, and to the extent necessary, respectfully request that this Honorable 

Case: 1:11-cv-07814 Document #: 6 Filed: 11/04/11 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:25
{00054715.DOC; v. 1} 2

Court grant Plaintiffs’ leave to dismiss all their claims against Defendant Google without 

prejudice and with all parties to bear their own costs pursuant to FRCP 41 and that this 

Honorable Court provide such other and further relief as it deems just and appropriate. 

Respectfully submitted,

By: /s/ David A. Novoselsky 

David A. Novoselsky (ARDC #02069881)

Edward J. Stawicki (ARDC #6287471)

NOVOSELSKY LAW OFFICES

120 North LaSalle, Suite 1400

Chicago, Illinois 60602

(312) 346-8930

Case: 1:11-cv-07814 Document #: 6 Filed: 11/04/11 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:26
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
PARTNERSHIP'S STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS AND BALANCE SHEETS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       9,734,531
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             9,734,531
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,993,018
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,450
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,040,965
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,993,018
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,545,017
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               669,938
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             151,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                724,079
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            724,079
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   724,079
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Case: 1:12-cv-03502 Document #: 15 Filed: 04/30/13 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:25
Case: 1:12-cv-03502 Document #: 15 Filed: 04/30/13 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:26
Case: 1:12-cv-03502 Document #: 15 Filed: 04/30/13 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:27
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM (UNAUDITED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF MARCH 31, 2000) AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                   $6,834,050
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                   $510,765
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                        $884,020
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                      $292,678
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                $858,232
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              $9,379,745
<COMMON>                                    $1,617,171
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                       ($816)
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                         $1,813,478
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>              $3,429,833
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               $0
<PREFERRED>                                    $59,376
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                        $3,028,807
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                            $180,140
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                           $0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                      $0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                       $0
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                           $0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                         $0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                    $0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>              $2,681,589
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>               $9,379,745
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                     $877,140
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                           $56,198
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                    $692,030
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                    $748,228
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                       $128,912
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                              $7,558
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                $136,470
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       $50,467
<NET-INCOME>                                   $86,003
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                     ($742)
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                  $85,261
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                       $79,129
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                      $33,869
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                        $484,032
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.56
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.56


</TABLE>
Case: 1:11-cv-07917 Document #: 12 Filed: 12/05/11 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:34
213.306 SF 44, Purchase Order-Invoice-Voucher. ( a ) ( 1 ) The micro-purchase limitation applies to all purchases, except that purchases not exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold may be made for— ( A ) *Fuel and oil.* U.S. Government fuel cards may be used in lieu of an SF 44 for fuel, oil, and authorized refueling-related items (see PGI 213.306 for procedures on use of fuel cards);
( B ) Overseas transactions by contracting officers in support of a contingency operation as defined in 10 U.S.C. 101(a)(13) or a humanitarian or peacekeeping operation as defined in 10 U.S.C. 3015(2); and
( C ) Transactions in support of intelligence and other specialized activities addressed by Part 2.7 of Executive Order 12333.
[64 FR 2596, Jan. 15, 1999, as amended at 71 FR 3413, Jan. 23, 2006; 72 FR 6484, Feb. 12, 2007; 76 FR 58150, Sept. 20, 2011; 87 FR 76992, Dec. 16, 2022]
DOCUMENT NOT IMAGED DUE TO REASON[S] CHECKED BELOW

9 SEALED/RESTRICTED DOCUMENT (A court order is required to

view a sealed/restricted document.)

9 TOO VOLUMINOUS 

9 PHOTOGRAPHS

9 CIVIL BOND 

9 CRIMINAL BOND 

G MISCELLANEOUS [MC] CASE 

9 OTHER: __________________________________________________

TO VIEW THE DOCUMENT YOU MUST OBTAIN THE CASE FILE AT THE 

CLERK’S OFFICE. THE CLERK’S OFFICE IS OPEN FROM 8:30 AM. to 4:30

P.M. MONDAY THROUGH FRIDAY EXCEPT FOR LEGAL HOLIDAYS. TO

OBTAIN A COPY CALL THE CLERK’S OFFICE SERVICE CENTER - COPY

DESK AT 312-435-5699. 

Case: 1:12-cv-03629 Document #: 10 Filed: 05/11/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:34
EXHIBIT
21





Subsidiaries
of Security National


Financial
Corporation


as of
March 31, 2010








Security
National Life Insurance Company





SecurityNational
Mortgage Company





Memorial
Estates, Inc.





Memorial
Mortuary





Paradise
Chapel Funeral Home, Inc.





California
Memorial Estates, Inc.





Cottonwood
Mortuary, Inc.





Deseret
Memorial, Inc.





Holladay
Cottonwood Memorial Foundation





Holladay
Memorial Park, Inc.





Greer-Wilson
Funeral Home, Inc.





Crystal
Rose Funeral Home, Inc.





Insuradyne
Corporation





Security
National Funding Company





Security
National Capital, Inc.





Memorial
Insurance Company of America





Capital
Reserve Life Insurance Company





C & J
Financial, LLC





Southern
Security Life Insurance Company (a Mississippi domiciled Company)





Marketing
Source Center, Inc. dba Security National Travel Services





Security
National Reverse Mortgage of Utah





Security
National Funding Company





Security
National Life of Louisiana (Being Dissolved in 2010)