alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

SHEET METAL WORKERS LOCAL 265 )

WELFARE FUND, et al., )

)

Plaintiffs, ) CIVIL ACTION

)

vs. ) NO. 12 C 3112

)

M & M SHEET METAL, INC., ) JUDGE JOHN Z. LEE

a Delaware corporation, )

)

Defendant. )

MOTION FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT AND JUDGMENT

NOWCOME Plaintiffs, bytheir attorneys, and move for entryof judgment by default against

Defendant, M & M SHEET METAL, INC., a Delaware corporation, in the total amount of

$141,806.64, plus Plaintiffs’ court costs and reasonable attorneys’ fees in the amount of $1,506.00.

On May 2, 2012, the Summons and Complaint was served on the Registered Agent by

tendering a copy of said documents to him personally at his place of business (a copy of the

Summons and Affidavit of Service is attached hereto). Therefore, Defendant’s answer was due on

May 23, 2012. As Defendant has failed to timely answer the Complaint, Plaintiffs respectfully

request entry of default and judgment.

/s/ Catherine M. Chapman 

Case: 1:12-cv-03112 Document #: 7 Filed: 06/13/12 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:25
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned, an attorney of record, hereby certifies that she electronically filed the

foregoing document (Motion) with the Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system, and further

certifies that I have mailed the above-referenced document by United States Mail to the following

non-CM/ECF participant on or before the hour of 5:00 p.m. this 13th day of June 2012:

Mr. Glen R. Barmann, Registered Agent

M & M Sheet Metal, Inc.

200 E. Court Street, Suite 602

Kankakee, IL 60901

Mr. Larry S. Palmateer

M & M Sheet Metal, Inc.

259 South West Avenue

Kankakee, IL 60901

/s/ Catherine M. Chapman 

Catherine M. Chapman

Attorney for Plaintiffs

BAUM SIGMAN AUERBACH & NEUMAN, LTD.

200 West Adams Street, Suite 2200

Chicago, IL 60606-5231

Bar No.: 6204026

Telephone: (312) 236-4316

Facsimile: (312) 236-0241

E-Mail: cchapman@baumsigman.com

I:\265J\M & M Sheet Metal\#23545\motion.cmc.df.wpd

Case: 1:12-cv-03112 Document #: 7 Filed: 06/13/12 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:26
19.804-4 Repetitive acquisitions. In order for repetitive acquisitions to be awarded through the 8(a) program, there must be separate offers and acceptances. This allows the SBA to determine— ( a ) Whether the requirement should be a competitive 8(a) award;
( b ) A nominated 8(a) participant's eligibility, and whether or not it is the same 8(a) participant that performed the previous contract;
( c ) The effect that contract award would have on the equitable distribution of 8(a) contracts; and
( d ) Whether the requirement should continue under the 8(a) program.
[64 FR 32744, June 17, 1999, as amended at 82 FR 4728, Jan. 13, 2017]
EXHIBIT 99.1
                                                                    ------------


                              FAB INDUSTRIES, INC.


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Fab Industries, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending August 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Samson Bitensky,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.



/s/  Samson Bitensky
-----------------------------
Samson Bitensky
Chief Executive Officer
October 15, 2002
#### 201.105-3 Copies.

The DFARS and the DFARS Procedures, Guidance, and Information (PGI) are available at *https://www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/dars/dfarspgi/current/index.html.*

[88 FR 73234, Oct. 25, 2023]
219.309 Solicitation provisions and contract clauses. ( 1 ) Use the provision at 252.219-7000, Advancing Small Business Growth, in solicitations, including solicitations using FAR part 12 procedures for acquisition of commercial products and commercial services, when the estimated annual value of the contract is expected to exceed— ( i ) The small business size standard, if expressed in dollars, for the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code assigned by the contracting officer; or
( ii ) $70 million, if the small business size standard is expressed as number of employees for the NAICS code assigned by the contracting officer.
[80 FR 30116, May 26, 2015, as amended at 88 FR 6583, Jan. 31, 2023]
#### Emanuel Zagon, Appellant, v. William Martin et al., Respondents.

Motion to dismiss appeal granted by default, with $10 costs, and appeal dismissed. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Ughetta, Christ and Pette, JJ., concur.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

N o. 04

- 18

- 00092

- CR

Michael Lewis ARCE

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 25th Judicial District Court, Guadalupe County, Texas

Trial Court No. 17

- 2118

- CR

- C

Honorable William Old, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION

, JUSTICE CHAPA , AND JUSTICE WATKINS

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is

AFFIRMED.

SIGNED May 29, 2019.

_____________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
On May 9, 2013, OCR and the U.S. Department of Justice  reached agreement with the University of Montana in Missoula, Montana regarding  the University’s handling of allegations and reports of sexual assault and  harassment at its Missoula campus.  The agreement resolved OCR’s  compliance review and the investigation initiated by the Justice  Department.  The University agreed to revise its policies, procedures and  investigative practices to provide a grievance procedure that ensures prompt  and equitable resolution of sexual harassment and sexual assault allegations;  adequately investigate and respond to allegations of retaliation by students  who have alleged sexual assault; take sufficient effective action to fully  eliminate a hostile environment based on sex, prevent its recurrence and  address its effects; ensure that the individuals designated to coordinate its  Title IX efforts receive adequate training and coordinate these efforts  effectively; and revise the University's notice of nondiscrimination to  adequately inform students that sex discrimination is prohibited.

***Read  the Press Release | Read    the Resolution Letter***PDF (425K)    | ***Read the Resolution Agreement***PDF (164K)

 

Top
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF ACR GROUP, INC. PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Annual Report of ACR Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
      10-K for the year ending February 28, 2007, as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Alex Trevino, Jr.,
      the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, to my knowledge that:




(1) The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/s/    Alex
                Trevino, Jr.Alex
                Trevino, Jr.Chief
                Executive OfficerMay
                29, 2007




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
      document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
      that
      appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
      required by Section 906, has been provided to ACR Group, Inc. and will be
      retained by ACR Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
      Commission or its staff upon request.




This
      certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
      Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
January 30, 1975.

M. P. No. 74-72.

#### Thomas W. Hemenway *v.*Cheryl L. Hemenway.

*Moore, Virgadamo, Boyle & Lynch, Ltd., Francis J. Boyle, Robert M. Silva, Joseph R. Palumbo, Jr.,*for petitioner. *Kirshenbaum & Kirshenbaum, Alfred Factor,*for respondent.

Motions of respondent to return the minor children of • the parties to the State of Rhode Island, or that the appeals in the request for relief on the part of Thomas W. Hemenway be denied, or in the alternative that respondent be permitted to file a motion in the Family Court adjudging Thomas W. Hemenway in contempt and requesting that custody of the minor children be granted to respondent are denied.

Paolino and Joslin, JJ. not participating.
Opinion issued August 1 , 201 3

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

NO. 01
B 12
B 00543
B CV

DAVID N. MANNING , Appellant

V.
WILMA J. MANNING , Appellee

On Appeal from the 300 th District Court Brazoria County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 60486



### MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant David N. Manning has failed to timely file a brief. See T EX

. R.
A PP

. P. 38.6( a ) ( governing time to file brief ), 38.8(a) ( governing failure of appellant2

to file brief). On April 1, 2013, this Court sent a notice to appellant that the appeal was subject to dismissal because he had failed to timely file his brief, and required a response on or before April 11, 2013

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.3(b) (allowing involuntary dismissal of case). On April 16, 2013, the notification was returned to the Court marked “Return to Sender, Not Deliverable As Addressed, Unable to
Forward.” The notice was sent to the address provided b y appellant in his notice of appeal and other filings with this Court , and appellant has not provided the Court
with a new address . Appellant was required to provide this Court with his current
address to facilitate this Court ’s communication with appella nt

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 6.3( c), 9.1(b). Accordingly, w e dismiss t he appeal for want of prosecution for f ailure to timely file a brief. We dismiss any pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Higley, and Bland

.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 979 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 979

               For the relief of Arturo Hernandez-Garcia.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 27, 2017

  Mr. Bennet introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
               For the relief of Arturo Hernandez-Garcia.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR ARTURO HERNANDEZ-GARCIA.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding subsections (a) and (b) of section 
201 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1151), Arturo 
Hernandez-Garcia shall be eligible for issuance of an immigrant visa or 
for adjustment of status to that of an alien lawfully admitted for 
permanent residence upon filing an application for issuance of an 
immigrant visa under section 204 of such Act (8 U.S.C. 1154) or for 
adjustment of status to lawful permanent resident.
    (b) Adjustment of Status.--If Arturo Hernandez-Garcia enters the 
United States before the filing deadline specified in subsection (c), 
he shall be considered to have entered and remained lawfully and shall, 
if otherwise eligible, be eligible for adjustment of status under 
section 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1255) as 
of the date of the enactment of this Act.
    (c) Deadline for Application and Payment of Fees.--Subsections (a) 
and (b) shall apply only if the application for issuance of an 
immigrant visa or the application for adjustment of status is filed 
with appropriate fees within 2 years after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
    (d) Reduction of Immigrant Visa Number.--Upon the granting of an 
immigrant visa or permanent residence to Arturo Hernandez-Garcia, the 
Secretary of State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, 
during the current or next following fiscal year, the total number of 
immigrant visas that are made available to natives of the country of 
the alien's birth under section 203(a) of the Immigration and 
Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1153(a)) or, if applicable, the total number 
of immigrant visas that are made available to natives of the country of 
the alien's birth under section 202(e) of such Act (8 U.S.C. 1152(e)).
    (e) Denial of Preferential Immigration Treatment for Certain 
Relatives.--The natural parents, brothers, and sisters of Arturo 
Hernandez-Garcia shall not, by virtue of such relationship, be accorded 
any right, privilege, or status under the Immigration and Nationality 
Act (8 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.).
                                 <all>
```
# GA_volume

# Quarterly

# Historical
###### Editorial Note on Part 842

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 842 appear at 81 FR 83688, Nov. 22, 2016.

#### § 842.86 Statute of limitations.

The government must file suit within 3 years after the cause of action accrues. It accrues when a responsible U.S. official knew or reasonably should have known the material facts that resulted in the claimed loss.

[55 FR 2809, Jan. 29, 1990. Redesignated at 81 FR 83696, Nov. 22, 2016]
204.2105 Solicitation provisions and contract clause. ( a ) Use the provision at 252.204-7016, Covered Defense Telecommunications Equipment or Services—Representation, in all solicitations, including solicitations using FAR part 12 procedures for the acquisition of commercial products and commercial services, and solicitations for task orders and delivery orders, basic ordering agreements (BOAs), orders against BOAs, blanket purchase agreements (BPAs), and calls against BPAs.
( b ) Use the provision at 252.204-7017, Prohibition on the Acquisition of Covered Defense Telecommunications Equipment or Services—Representation, in all solicitations, including solicitations using FAR part 12 procedures for the acquisition of commercial products and commercial services, and solicitations for task orders and delivery orders, BOAs, orders against BOAs, BPAs, and calls against BPAs.
( c ) Use the clause at 252.204-7018, Prohibition on the Acquisition of Covered Defense Telecommunications Equipment or Services, in all solicitations and resultant awards, including solicitations and contracts using FAR part 12 procedures for the acquisition of commercial products and commercial services, and solicitations and awards for task orders and delivery orders, BOAs, orders against BOAs, BPAs, and calls against BPAs.
[84 FR 72236, Dec. 31, 2019, as amended at 88 FR 6580, Jan. 31, 2023]
IIA 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 38 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United 

States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection 

Agency relating to ‘‘Approval, Disapproval and Promulgation of Air 

Quality Implementation Plans; Partial Approval and Partial Disapproval 

of Air Quality Implementation Plans and Federal Implementation Plan; 

Utah; Revisions to Regional Haze State Implementation Plan; Federal 

Implementation Plan for Regional Haze’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 13, 2017 

Mr. LEE (for himself and Mr. HATCH) introduced the following joint resolution; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of 

title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by 

the Environmental Protection Agency relating to ‘‘Approval, Disapproval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Partial Approval and Partial Disapproval of Air Quality Implementation Plans and Federal Implementation Plan; Utah; Revisions to Regional 

Haze State Implementation Plan; Federal Implementation Plan for Regional Haze’’. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SJ 38 IS 

1 That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the En2 vironmental Protection Agency relating to ‘‘Approval, Dis3 approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation 

4 Plans; Partial Approval and Partial Disapproval of Air 

5 Quality Implementation Plans and Federal Implementa6 tion Plan; Utah; Revisions to Regional Haze State Imple7 mentation Plan; Federal Implementation Plan for Re8 gional Haze’’ (81 Fed. Reg. 43894 (July 5, 2016)), and 

9 such rule shall have no force or effect. 

Æ 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Analysis of the Impact of a 500 Enrollment Threshold

Because the Department has limited data on distance education, we reviewed data from NC-SARA for a

sample of years to estimate the impact of a 500 enrollment threshold on institutions and students.1

Based on our analysis, a 500 enrollment threshold would have the following impacts on NC-SARA 

institutions and students:

• More than half of the more than 1.5 million out-of-state distance education students at NCSARA institutions would now be covered by direct State approval.

• Meanwhile, this would affect fewer than 5 percent of the more than 2,000 NC-SARA institutions

(64 institutions in one year, 70 institutions in another year).

• More than a third of the impacted institutions would only need approval from 1 additional 

State.

• More than 70 percent of the impacted institutions would be required to obtain approval from 

10 States or fewer.

• Fewer than 20 percent of the schools that are subject to any direct authorization requirements 

would be required to obtain approval from more than 25 States. 

• However, those schools enroll more than two thirds of the students who would now be covered 

by direct State approval.

• This highlights the balance between achieving the goals of reciprocity to reduce cost and burden 

for institutions enrolling relatively few students in a given State.

1 See: https://public.tableau.com/app/profile/nc.sara/viz/InstitutionsbyTotalEDEE/6_3InsbyTotalEnr
# Επίσημη Εφημερίδα C 345/2015

| | ISSN 1977-0901 |
| --- | --- |
| Επίσημη Εφημερίδα
  της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης | C 345 |
| | |
| Έκδοση στην ελληνική γλώσσα | Ανακοινώσεις και Πληροφορίες | 58ό έτος18 Οκτωβρίου 2015 |

ISSN 1977-0901

Επίσημη Εφημερίδα

της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης

C 345

Έκδοση στην ελληνική γλώσσα

Ανακοινώσεις και Πληροφορίες

58ό έτος18 Οκτωβρίου 2015

---

| Ανακοίνωση αριθ | Περιεχόμενα | Σελίδα |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Πληροφορίες |
| | ΠΛΗΡΟΦΟΡΙΕΣ ΠΡΟΕΡΧΟΜΕΝΕΣ ΑΠΟ ΤΑ ΘΕΣΜΙΚΑ ΚΑΙ ΛΟΙΠΑ ΟΡΓΑΝΑ ΚΑΙ ΤΟΥΣ ΟΡΓΑΝΙΣΜΟΥΣ ΤΗΣ ΕΥΡΩΠΑΪΚΗΣ ΕΝΩΣΗΣ |
| | Συμβουλιο |
| 2015/C 345/01 | Δήλωση του Συμβουλίου | 1 |

Ανακοίνωση αριθ

Περιεχόμενα

Σελίδα

IV   Πληροφορίες

ΠΛΗΡΟΦΟΡΙΕΣ ΠΡΟΕΡΧΟΜΕΝΕΣ ΑΠΟ ΤΑ ΘΕΣΜΙΚΑ ΚΑΙ ΛΟΙΠΑ ΟΡΓΑΝΑ ΚΑΙ ΤΟΥΣ ΟΡΓΑΝΙΣΜΟΥΣ ΤΗΣ ΕΥΡΩΠΑΪΚΗΣ ΕΝΩΣΗΣ

Συμβουλιο

2015/C 345/01

Δήλωση του Συμβουλίου

1

---

| EL | |
| --- | --- |

EL

---

IV Πληροφορίες

ΠΛΗΡΟΦΟΡΙΕΣ ΠΡΟΕΡΧΟΜΕΝΕΣ ΑΠΟ ΤΑ ΘΕΣΜΙΚΑ ΚΑΙ ΛΟΙΠΑ ΟΡΓΑΝΑ ΚΑΙ ΤΟΥΣ ΟΡΓΑΝΙΣΜΟΥΣ ΤΗΣ ΕΥΡΩΠΑΪΚΗΣ ΕΝΩΣΗΣ

Συμβουλιο

| 18.10.2015 | EL | Επίσημη Εφημερίδα της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης | C 345/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.10.2015

EL

Επίσημη Εφημερίδα της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης

C 345/1

---

ΔΉΛΩΣΗ ΤΟΥ ΣΥΜΒΟΥΛΊΟΥ

(2015/C 345/01)

Το Συμβούλιο σημειώνει ότι η δέσμευση για άρση όλων των κυρώσεων της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης (ΕΕ) που έχουν σχέση με το πυρηνικό ζήτημα σύμφωνα με το Κοινό Ολοκληρωμένο Σχέδιο Δράσης (ΚΟΣΔ) δεν θίγει τον μηχανισμό επίλυσης διαφορών που προσδιορίζεται στο ΚΟΣΔ και την εκ νέου εισαγωγή κυρώσεων της ΕΕ σε περίπτωση σοβαρής αθέτησης από μέρους του Ιράν των υποχρεώσεων που έχει αναλάβει βάσει του ΚΟΣΔ.

Σε περίπτωση σοβαρής αθέτησης από μέρους του Ιράν των υποχρεώσεων που έχει αναλάβει βάσει του ΚΟΣΔ, το Συμβούλιο δεσμεύεται να επαναφέρει άμεσα όλες τις κυρώσεις της ΕΕ τις σχετικές με το πυρηνικό ζήτημα οι οποίες έχουν ανασταλεί και/ή λήξει, με κοινή σύσταση του Ύπατου Εκπροσώπου της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης για θέματα εξωτερικής πολιτικής και πολιτικής ασφαλείας, της Γαλλίας, της Γερμανίας και του Ηνωμένου Βασιλείου, προς το Συμβούλιο.

---
22.2101 Definitions. As used in this subpart (in accordance with 29 CFR 13.2)— *Accrual year* means the 12-month period during which a contractor may limit an employee's accrual of paid sick leave to no less than 56 hours (see 29 CFR 13.5(b)(1)).
*Certification issued by a health care provider* has the meaning given in 29 CFR 13.2.
*Employee* — ( 1 ) ( i ) Means any person engaged in performing work on or in connection with a contract covered by E.O. 13706; and ( A ) Whose wages under such contract are governed by the Service Contract Labor Standards statute (41 U.S.C. chapter 67), the Wage Rate Requirements (Construction) statute (40 U.S.C. chapter 31, subchapter IV), or the Fair Labor Standards Act (29 U.S.C. chapter 8);
( B ) Including employees who qualify for an exemption from the Fair Labor Standards Act's minimum wage and overtime provisions; and
( C ) Regardless of the contractual relationship alleged to exist between the individual and the employer; and
( ii ) Includes any person performing work on or in connection with the contract and individually registered in a bona fide apprenticeship or training program registered with the Department of Labor's Employment and Training Administration, Office of Apprenticeship, or with a State Apprenticeship Agency recognized by the Office of Apprenticeship.
( 2 ) ( i ) An employee performs on a contract if the employee directly performs the specific services called for by the contract; and
( ii ) An employee performs in connection with a contract if the employee's work activities are necessary to the performance of a contract but are not the specific services called for by the contract.
*Health care provider* has the meaning given in 29 CFR 13.2.
*Multiemployer plan* means a plan to which more than one employer is required to contribute and which is maintained pursuant to one or more collective bargaining agreements between one or more employee organizations and more than one employer.
*Paid sick leave* means compensated absence from employment that is required by E.O. 13706 and 29 CFR part 13.