alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C.
Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection
with the Quarterly Report of Lubys, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended February 10, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, K. Scott Gray, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |     |  |                                                  
|-------------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 19, 2010 |  | By: |  | /s/ K. Scott Gray                                
|                     |  |     |  | K. Scott Gray                                    
|                     |  |     |  | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-7396
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus AARON LEVON BURTON, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Walter D. Kelley, District Judge. (4:04-cr-00087-WDK) Submitted: December 13, 2007 Decided: December 21, 2007 Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Aaron Levon Burton, Appellant Pro Se. Lisa Rae McKeel, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Aaron Levon Burton appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for enlargement of time. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Burton , No. 4:04-cr-00087 (E.D. Va. Aug. 8, 2007). We also deny Burton’s request for appointment of counsel and his motion for transcripts. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
2009.570-6 Evaluation, findings, and contract award. The contracting officer shall evaluate all relevant facts submitted by an offeror and other relevant information. After evaluating this information against the criteria of 2009.570-3, the contracting officer shall make a finding of whether organizational conflicts of interest exist with respect to a particular offeror. If it has been determined that real or potential conflicts of interest exist, the contracting officer shall: ( a ) Disqualify the offeror from award;
( b ) Avoid or eliminate such conflicts by appropriate measures; or
( c ) Award the contract under the waiver provision of 2009.570-9.
|Exhibit 99                                                  
|------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                            
|PPL CorporationCorporate Organization(Selected Subsidiaries)
|                                                            
|PPL Corporation                                             
|                                                            
|                                                            
|                                                            
|                                                            
|                                                            
|                                                            
|                                                            
|                                                            
|                                                            
|                                                            
|                                                            
|                                                            
|                                                            
|                                                            
|                                                            
|                                                            
|                                                            
|                                                            
|                                                            
|                                                            
|                                                            
|                                                            
|                                                            
|                                                            
|                                                            
|                                                            
|                                                            
|                                                            
|                                                            
|                                                            
|                                                            
|                                                            
|                                                            
|                                                            
|                                                            
|                                                            
|                                                            
|
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>        5


<S>                                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              Year
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                        25,821
<SECURITIES>                               2,700,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                  2,030
<ALLOWANCES>                                       0
<INVENTORY>                                        0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              27,851
<PP&E>                                         1,993
<DEPRECIATION>                                   221
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             2,729,844
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         25,776
<BONDS>                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                   2,526,850
<OTHER-SE>                                   234,381
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               2,729,844
<SALES>                                            0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   0
<CGS>                                              0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              57,163
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (57,163)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                0
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (57,163)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.01)


</TABLE>
#### Josephine Vaglio, Respondent, v. Our Lady of Mount Carmel Roman Catholic Church, Appellant.

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injury, the defendant appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, entered May 27, 1963 after trial upon a jury’s verdict in favor of the plaintiff. Judgment reversed on the law and the facts, without costs, and complaint dismissed on the law, without costs. In our opinion, there was no evidence to support a finding of actionable negligence against the defendant (cf. *Spaulding*v. *Christakos,*269 App. Div. 909, affd. 295 N. Y. 973; *Miller*v. *Gmbel Bros.,*262 N. Y. 107; *Boccaccino*v. *Our Lady of Pity Roman Catholic Church,*18 A D 2d 1055; *Dolan*v. *Hotel Campbell,*260 App. Div. 872; *Friedfeld*v. *Chemical Corn Exch. Bank,*22 A D 2d 809). Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Hill and Rabin, JJ., concur.
1 District Judge of the Eastern District of Texas, sitting by

designation.

2 Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

For the Fifth Circuit

No. 96-60647

VICTORIA CHIASSON, on behalf of

Clarence J. Chiasson

Petitioner,

VERSUS

AVONDALE INDUSTRIES, INC.; AVONDALE SHIPYARD, INC.;

DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKER’S COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, U.S. 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Respondents.

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Eastern District of Louisiana

(94-3665)

July 9, 1997

Before DUHÉ, BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges, and COBB1, District Judge.

PER CURIAM:2

AFFIRM. See 5TH CIR. R. 47.6.
H. Res. 164 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

February 27, 2023. 

Resolved, That the following named Members be, and are 

hereby, elected to the following standing committees of the 

House of Representatives: 

COMMITTEE ON AGRICULTURE: Ms. Pingree, Mr. 

Carbajal, Ms. Craig, Mr. Soto. 

COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES: Mr. Veasey. 

COMMITTEE ON THE BUDGET: Mr. Espaillat. 

COMMITTEE ON NATURAL RESOURCES: Mrs. Lee of Nevada. 

COMMITTEE ON SCIENCE, SPACE, AND TECHNOLOGY: 

Mr. Tonko. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
#### KRISCHEVSKY, Appellant, v. BATTALI, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.

June 22, 1903.)

Action by Augustus Krischevsky against Salema Battali. From a judgment in favor of defendant, plaintiff appeals. Affirmed.

Wilford H. Smith, for appellant.

Timothy Power, for respondent.

MacLEAN, J.

This action was brought by the plaintiff, as administrator of the estate of his deceased wife, to recover upon a written acknowledgment of a loan, dated April 1, 1902, with interest. The defendant admitted the making and delivery of the admission of indebtedness, and set up payment, in proof of which she offered a receipt, dated July l4, 1902, for a larger amount. Some evidence given by the defendant was possibly objectionable under section 829, Code Civ. Proc., despite -an allusion by the administrator himself to the transaction of his wife. But, disregarding the objectionable testimony, a daughter of the deceased and a neighbor gave evidence amply sufficient to show that the receipt was written in 1902 upon and coincident with the payment of the money. The judgment should be affirmed. Judgment affirmed, with costs to the respondent. All concur.
### DEPARTMEN T OF U.S . DEPARTMEN T O F TRANSPORTATIOS^^NSPORTATIO N

Offic e o f Hearing s • - • >^- t f OPERATION

S Washington , D.C . mNO V 1 5 P 1:U 9 

# Shan e KNisse n FA A DOCKE

T NO . CP04GL000 1 (EIR2002-GL-31-0034 ) (Civi l Penalt

y Action ) 

# (Fflft26b^-/qi6 i
Administrativ e La w Judg e Richar dC . Goodwi n 

### Agenc y Informatio n Notificatio n The Agency Attorne

y hereby notifie s Administrativ e La w Judg e Richar

dC . Goodwin tha

t th e Agency ha s contacte dthe Nort h KemStat

e Priso n wher

e Mr . Nissen , the Respondent i s a prisoner . Th

e Record s departmen

t of the priso n reviewe dthe record s availabl e an dstate dtha

t Shane K Nissen , CDCR#T76107 , i s no t scheduledt

o be release dunti l 2017 . Date dthi s Is J da

y o f Novembe r 2010 .

Senior Attorne y Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n Grea t Lake s Region , AGL-7 K 230 0 Eas t Devo n Avenue De s Plaines , I

L 6001 8 Phone : (847)294-771 3 Fax : (847 ) 294-749 8 

# -ce rn i 

## Certificat e o f Servic e I hereb y certif

y tha t th e foregoin g Agenc y Respons e t o Secon dLette r ha s bee n maile dthi s da

y b y Firs t Clas s Mai l to : Origina l an dOn e Copy : Hearin g Docke t Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S W Washington , D C 2059 1 Attn : Hearin g Docke t

Clerk , AGC-43 0 Wilbu r Wrigh t Buildin g ~ Roo m201 4 On e Cop y to : Shan e Kyl e Nisse n T-7610 7 N.K.S.P . D-6-133 L P.O . Bo x 500 5 Delano , C A 9321 6 Telephone : * Fax : * On e Cop y to : Th e Honorabl e Richar dC . Goodwi n Administrativ e La w Judg e Offic e o f Hearings , M-2 0 U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E. , Roo mE-12-32 0 Washington , D C 2059 0 Telephone : (202 ) 366-213 9 Attorne y Adviso r

(202 ) 366-213 9 Lega l Assistan t Fax : (202 ) 366-753 6 Date dthi s 1s t

day o f Novembe r

2010 .
Tamm y Gardne r Lega l Technicia n FA A Grea t

Lake s
S. Con. Res. 31 Agreed to December 21, 2017

One Hundred Fifteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE FIRST SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and seventeen 

Concurrent Resolution 

Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 

SECTION 1. USE OF THE ROTUNDA OF THE CAPITOL FOR CEREMONY 

TO AWARD THE CONGRESSIONAL GOLD MEDAL TO BOB 

DOLE. 

(a) AUTHORIZATION.—The rotunda of the Capitol is authorized 

to be used on January 17, 2018, for a ceremony to award the 

Congressional Gold Medal to Bob Dole. 

(b) PREPARATIONS.—Physical preparations for the conduct of 

the ceremony described in subsection (a) shall be carried out in 

accordance with such conditions as may be prescribed by the 

Architect of the Capitol. 

Attest: 

Secretary of the Senate. 

Attest: 

Clerk of the House of Representatives.
Exhibit 32.2

**Certification of****Chief Financial Officer**

**Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code**

I, Tracy L. Morris, Chief Financial Officer of Capital Southwest Corporation, certify that, to my knowledge:

| 1. |   |   | the Form 10-Q, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 4, 2010 ("accompanied report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |   |   |
|----|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|    |        |        |                                                                                                                                                                                                                   |        |        |
| 2. |   |   | the information contained in the accompanied report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of Capital Southwest Corporation.                        |   |   |

| Date: |  February 4, 2010 |  By: | /s/ Tracy L. Morris                            |   |   |
|-------|------------------------|-----------|------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|       |                   |      | Tracy L. Morris, Chief Financial Officer  |   |
ATTACHMENT HEADER SHEET

Attachment Number 013

Attachment Name

Attachment 13 PKI PbSrTiZrO Process Flow

Associated PMN Section Number

Pt.2, Sec.B, 1Ia.

Does not contain CBI

Report Number

CONSI 10317786855351
00

00

NT

0-iC.C4

I cn

* O 0 0

W) 0

C.)Y . Cc) oCd~ *d

0.C.0

0 0

0 = 'd

N 0

> 0 0

u uJ

'-4 C.)d 0 

0 0 0

.4) .0 c_ _ _ _ _ _

C.C ) 0__ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6738
DONALD L. WILKINS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus ROY D. BRADLEY, Assistant Public Defender, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge. (CA-96-375-2) Submitted: November 7, 1996 Decided: November 19, 1996 Before RUSSELL and WIDENER, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Donald L. Wilkins, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant, a Virginia inmate, app eals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) (1994), amended by Prison Litigation Reform Act, Pub. L. No. 104-134, 110 Stat. 1321 (1996). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Wilkins v. Bradley , No. CA-96-375- 2 (E.D. Va. Apr. 29, 1996). We dispense with oral argument becausethe facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### 217.208 Solicitation provisions and contract clauses.

Sealed bid solicitations shall not include provisions for evaluations of options unless the contracting officer determines that there is a reasonable likelihood that the options will be exercised (10 U.S.C. 3206(e)). This limitation also applies to sealed bid solicitations for the contracts excluded by FAR 17.200.

[63 FR 11529, Mar. 9, 1998, as amended at 71 FR 27642, May 12, 2006; 87 FR 76993, Dec. 16, 2022]
#### 1632.806-70 Contract clause.

The clause set forth in 1652.232-73 shall be inserted in all FEHBP contracts.

[55 FR 27415, July 2, 1990]
<PAGE>

                                                               Exhibit 12.(a)(2)

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                                  AS ENACTED BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report on Form 20-F of Ricoh Company, Ltd. (the
"Company") for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Tatsuo Hirakawa,
Executive Vice President and Deputy President (Accounting and Personnel) of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (s) 1350, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date: June 30, 2003

                                  By: /s/ Tatsuo Hirakawa
                                     -------------------------------------------
                                      Tatsuo Hirakawa
                                      Executive Vice President and
                                      Deputy President
                                      (Accounting and Personnel)
#### Townsend *v.*Sessoms *et al.,*executors.

December 11, 1912.

Petition for injunction. Before Judge Parker. Ware superior court. July 6, 1912.

*S. C. Townsend,*for plaintiff.

*Wilson, Bennett & Lamb din,*for defendants.

Lumpkin, J.

1. Exceptions to the admission of evidence, without showing what ground of objection was made thereto, furnish no question for adjudication by this court.

2. There was no abuse of discretion in refusing to grant an injunction.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 23
- 0417 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. TRINA ROE,

Defendant and Appellant
.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including March 13 , 2024, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

February 5 2024

02/05/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0417
#### Paul Lewis, by Emma S. Lewis, His Guardian ad Litem, Appellant, v. Alex J. Sabato et al., Respondents. Geraldine Strang, an Infant, by Her Guardian ad Litem, George Strang, et al., Respondents, v. Alex J. Sabato Doing Business as Paramount Taxi Company, et al., Defendants, and Paul Lewis, Appellant.

Motions to dismiss appeal denied on condition that appellants be ready to argue or submit the appeal at the October 1960 Term, beginning October 3, 1960, for which term the appeal is ordered to be placed on the calendar. The record and appellants’ brief must be served and filed on or before September 1,1960. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Christ and Pette, JJ., concur; Ughetta, J., not voting.
U.S. DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

ATTORNEY APPEARANCE FORM

NOTE: In order to appear before this Court an attorney must either be a member in good

standing of this Court’s general bar or be granted leave to appear pro hac vice as provided for

by Local Rules 83.12 through 83.14.

In the Matter of Case Number:

AN APPEARANCE IS HEREBY FILED BY THE UNDERSIGNED AS ATTORNEY FOR:

NAME (Type or print)

SIGNATURE (Use electronic signature if the appearance form is filed electronically)

 s/

FIRM

STREET ADDRESS

CITY/STATE/ZIP

ID NUMBER (SEE ITEM 3 IN INSTRUCTIONS) TELEPHONE NUMBER

ARE YOU ACTING AS LEAD COUNSEL IN THIS CASE? YES NO 

ARE YOU ACTING AS LOCAL COUNSEL IN THIS CASE? YES NO 

ARE YOU A MEMBER OF THIS COURT’S TRIAL BAR? YES NO 

IF THIS CASE REACHES TRIAL, WILL YOU ACT AS THE TRIAL ATTORNEY? YES NO 

IF THIS IS A CRIMINAL CASE, CHECK THE BOX BELOW THAT DESCRIBES YOUR STATUS.

RETAINED COUNSEL APPOINTED COUNSEL 

Case: 1:11-cv-07972 Document #: 66 Filed: 05/02/13 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:411