alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM BOTH
THE DECEMBER 31, 1997 BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENT OF INCOME AND EXPENSES
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000711512
<NAME> AMERICAN REPUBLIC REALTY FUND I
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          16,900
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                      17,171,225
<DEPRECIATION>                               9,037,393
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,092,331
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                     10,769,977
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                 (2,835,290)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,092,331
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,479,762
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,984,376
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             661,246
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                251,785
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   139,960
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    12.60
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 815 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 815

   To amend titles XVIII and XIX of the Social Security Act to make 
  premium and cost-sharing subsidies available to low-income Medicare 
part D beneficiaries who reside in Puerto Rico or another territory of 
                           the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 4, 2017

Mr. Nelson (for himself, Mr. Menendez, Mr. Blumenthal, Mrs. Gillibrand, 
 and Mr. Schumer) introduced the following bill; which was read twice 
                and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend titles XVIII and XIX of the Social Security Act to make 
  premium and cost-sharing subsidies available to low-income Medicare 
part D beneficiaries who reside in Puerto Rico or another territory of 
                           the United States.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Territories Medicare Prescription 
Drug Assistance Equity Act of 2017''.

SEC. 2. ELIMINATING EXCLUSION OF PART D ELIGIBLE INDIVIDUALS RESIDING 
              IN TERRITORIES FROM ELIGIBILITY FOR PREMIUM AND COST-
              SHARING SUBSIDIES.

    (a) In General.--Section 1860D-14(a)(3) of the Social Security Act 
(42 U.S.C. 1395w-114(a)(3)) is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (A), in the matter preceding clause 
        (i), by striking ``subject to subparagraph (F),'';
            (2) in subparagraph (B)(v), in the matter preceding 
        subclause (I), by striking ``Subject to subparagraph (F), the 
        Secretary'' and inserting ``The Secretary'';
            (3) in subparagraph (C), by adding at the end the following 
        new sentence: ``In the case of an individual who is not a 
        resident of the 50 States or the District of Columbia, the 
        poverty line (as such term is defined in clause (ii)) that 
        shall apply to such individual shall be the poverty line for 
        the 48 contiguous States and the District of Columbia.''; and
            (4) by striking subparagraph (F).
    (b) Application of Medicaid Provisions.--Section 1935 of the Social 
Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396u-5) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a), by striking ``subject to subsection 
        (e)'' in the matter preceding paragraph (1); and
            (2) by striking subsection (e).
    (c) Conforming Amendment.--Section 1108(f) of the Social Security 
Act (42 U.S.C. 1308(f)) is amended by striking ``and section 
1935(e)(1)(B)'' in the matter preceding clause (i).
    (d) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall take 
effect on January 1, 2018.
                                 <all>
```
***Read the Resolution Letter***
PDF
***| Readthe Resolution Agreement***
PDF
#### In the Matter of the Estate of Kiricoula Garas, Deceased.

Appeal dismissed unless records and briefs are filed and served on or before March 6, 1961. Respondent’s brief must be filed by March 16, 1961 if appeal is to be argued at March 1961 Term.
Exhibit 31.2**Certifications**I, Michael Sweet, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of MDI, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based onsuch evaluation; and  c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarterthat has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.Dated: March 23, 2007         By /s/ Michael Sweet             Michael Sweet      Chief Financial Officer
#### In the Matter of Paul G. Ngobeni, an Attorney, Respondent. Committee on Professional Standards, Petitioner.

[831 NYS2d 736]-

Per Curiam.

Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court in 1995 and is also admitted in Connecticut and Massachusetts. He has maintained a residence in Putnam, Connecticut.

The Superior Court of Connecticut suspended respondent by order dated December 19, 2005 for failing to appear at a continued disciplinary hearing. Respondent had been charged with failing to pay the fee of a professional witness, failing to communicate with clients, neglecting clients’ claims, failing to return a client file, and failing to keep his clients’ property safe. It also appears that he has several criminal charges pending in Connecticut involving forgery, larceny and practicing law while his license is suspended.

*960Furthermore, respondent has been reciprocally suspended by order of the Supreme Judicial Court of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, dated March 16, 2006, and by the United States Department of Justice by order dated February 24, 2006.

Petitioner moves for an order imposing reciprocal discipline based upon respondent’s suspension in Connecticut *(see*22 NYCRR 806.19). We grant petitioner’s motion and conclude that respondent should be reciprocally suspended *(see Matter of Schwartz,*290 AD2d 802 [2002]).

Cardona, EJ., Mercure, Peters, Spain and Carpinello, JJ., concur. Ordered that petitioner’s motion for reciprocal discipline is granted; and it is further ordered that respondent is suspended from the practice of law, effective immediately, and until further order of this Court; and it is further ordered that, for the period of suspension, respondent is commanded to desist and refrain from the practice of law in any form, either as principal or as agent, clerk or employee of another; and he hereby is forbidden to appear as an attorney or counselor-at-law before any court, judge, justice, board, commission or other public authority, or to give to another an opinion as to the law or its application, or any advice in relation thereto; and it is further ordered that respondent shall comply with the provisions of this Court’s rules regulating the conduct of suspended attorneys *(see*22 NYCRR 806.9).
#### In the Matter of Stanley Roy Root, an Attorney.

— Motion granted and upon reargument respondent’s suspension as an attorney and counselor at law in the State of New York is stayed on consent of the Departmental Disciplinary Committee and on condition that respondent perfects the criminal appeal for the March 1979 Term as indicated in the determination of this court on motion decided simultaneously herewith. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Silverman, Evans, Lane and Markewich, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1997
<CASH>                                             440
<SECURITIES>                                       190
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,327
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                         97
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 9,381
<PP&E>                                          39,210
<DEPRECIATION>                                  16,234
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  35,770
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,503
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,525
<OTHER-SE>                                      19,821
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    35,770
<SALES>                                         12,592
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                17,223
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   14,300
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,230
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 371
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,014
<INCOME-TAX>                                       685
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,329
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  6,600
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,929
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    16.87
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    16.87
        

</TABLE>
#### Richard Stone, Appellant, v Norman Stone, Respondent, et al., Defendants.

[831 NYS2d 728]

*535In an action, inter alia, for the dissolution of a partnership, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Rudolph, J.), entered August 8, 2006, which denied his motion to vacate an order and judgment (one paper) of the same court (Burrows, J.), entered October 11, 1994, among other things, granting the motion of the defendant Norman Stone to confirm the findings of a referee, and to vacate a judgment of the same court (Burrows, J.), entered January 9, 1995, which was in favor of the defendant Norman Stone and against the plaintiff in the principal sum of $28,788.63.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiffs contentions were previously raised and decided against him, or could have been raised on a prior appeal in this matter *(see Stone v Stone,*19 AD3d 404 [2005]). “Therefore, reconsideration of these issues is barred by the doctrine of law of the case” *(Matter of Suzuki-Peters v Peters,*37 AD3d 726 [2007], quoting *Palumbo v Palumbo,*10 AD3d 680 [2004]; *see Matter of Shondel J. v Mark D.,*18 AD3d 551 [2005], *affd*7 NY3d 320 [2006]; *Jacobs v Macy’s E., Inc.,*17 AD3d 318, 319 [2005]).

We decline the respondent’s request to impose sanctions against the plaintiff *(see*22 NYCRR 130-1.1 [a]). Mastro, J.E, Ritter, Skelos, Garni and McCarthy, JJ., concur.
C. A. No. 75-47.

#### State *v.*Richard Rattenni.

*Julius C. Michaelson,*Attorney General, *Judith Romney Wegner,*Special Asst. Attorney General, for plaintiff. *Bevilacqua & Cidlline, John F. Cidlline,*for defendant.

The State’s motion to dismiss appeal of defendant is denied. The defendant’s petition to file his transcript out of time is granted subject to defendant’s payment of the estimated fee for the preparation of the transcript within 20 days of this order.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences Special Emphasis Panel; Conference Grant Review.                    

*Date:*                         February 12, 2021.                    

*Time:*                         8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Democracy Boulevard, Room 1076, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Carol Lambert, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Office of Scientific Review, National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Democracy Boulevard, Room 1076, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-435-0814,                         *lambert@mail.nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.859, Pharmacology, Physiology, and Biological Chemistry Research; 93.350, B—Cooperative Agreements; 93.859, Biomedical Research and Research Training, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: January 15, 2021.

David W. Freeman,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2021-01450 Filed 1-22-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
## u.s.Departmentof Transportation OfficeoftheSecretary ofTransportation

Subject: Exception to Normal Payout Procedures for Subsidized Carriers at Shutdown-Airports

## 4v~7)**j£&-n~~ ~**  From: Dennis J .DeVany EAS and Domestic Analysis, X-53

To: Greg Frazier, S3.6

Airport Closures 

# Memorandum

Date: May4. 2011

Reply OAAMemoNo.2011-31 to Kevin Schlemmer, X-53 Attn. Ext. 63176 of:

OnApril 22, 2011, a tornado caused extensive damageto Lambert St. Louis International Airport (STL). As a result, STLwas closed from late evening onApril 22 until April 24. Tenants with operations on Concourse C, including Cape Air, had to be relocated to other concourses at the airport, and as aresult, CapeAir was unable to resume operations until April 26. Also due to the closure ofSTL, Air Choice One operated some its flights to/from the Spirit ofSt. Louis Airport (SUS). Due to extensiveflooding ofthe airfield at Cape Girardeau Regional Airport (CGI), operations were suspended there until April 29. 

### It has been our policy, on a case-by-casebasis, to paythe airline its usual subsidyrate when airports havebeen closed on the grounds that the circumstances are beyond the carriers' control and that there are only minimal cost savings to the carriers while they would lose all ofthe revenue. (The carriers would only save onfuel and a portion of maintenancebecausethey would notbe able to return aircraft to lessors or layoff personnel). Consistent with that precedent, we request that you to compensate Hyannis Air Service, Inc. d/b/a Cape Air (Cape Air) and Multi-Aero, Inc. d/b/a Air Choice One (Air Choice One) for flights that could not be operated during the period ofApril 22- April 26 due to the STL airport closure or were operated to SUS.- 2

- Flights tolfrom the following subsidized communities are affected (April 22-April 26): • Burlington,IA • Decatur.IL • Cape Girardeau, MO • Fort Leonard Wood, MO • Kirksville, MO • Marion/Herrin, IL • Quincy,IL In addition, Cape Air's flights to/from Cape Girardeau are also eligible for compensation from April 26 through April 29. So that you will know whether a cancellation was related to the airports' being closed, we have instructed Cape Air and AirChoice One to indicate "AirportNot Operating" on its monthly subsidybillings for flights that it could not completed for that reason, and have informed them that they will be fully compensated for such cancellations.

cc: CapeAir AirChoice One
**Exhibit31.1**

**Certifications**

I, J. Coley Clark, certify that:

1.                                       I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/Aof BancTec, Inc;

2.                                       Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

3.                                       Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly presentin all material respects the financial condition, results of operations andcash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport.

4.                                       The registrant’s other certifyingofficer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

a) Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation, and

c) Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.                                       The registrant’s other certifyingofficer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions).

a) Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial data; and 

b) Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting. 

 
| Date:  June 26, 2007 | /s/ J. Coley Clark                       |   |
|---------------------------|------------------------------------------|--------|
|                      | *J. Coley Clark*                         |
| * *                  | *President and Chief Executive  Officer* |

 

----