alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

**JALIL WILLIAMS,**

**Petitioner**

**v.**

**COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,**

**Respondent :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 38 EM 2016** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 25th day of May, 2016, the Application for Ext raordinary Relief is** 

DENIED

**.**
##### 



Exhibit 31 Certification of Trust Officer Pursuant to
Rule 13a-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 I, Ted L. Hall, certify that: 1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Kiewit Royalty Trust, for which U.S. Bank National Association acts as Trustee;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this annual report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present
in all material respects the financial condition, distributable income and changes in trust corpus of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this annual report;4.
    
    I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)), or for causing such controls and procedures to be established and maintained, for the registrant and I have:a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this annual report is being prepared;b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth quarter in the
case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and5.
    
    I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors:a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting.
 Dated this 30th day of March, 2005 By:
    
    /s/ Ted L. HallTed L. HallTrust OfficerU.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee
Type Description Quantity Unit Price Amount

Professional

Services

[CHOLESTEROL] Cholesterol Patent Litigation: Brandeis Univ.

v. East Side Ovens, Inc., 1:2012cv01508: Gregory Sidak

(10/01/2012 - 12/31/2012)

84.00 $750.00 $63,000.00

Professional

Services

[CHOLESTEROL] Cholesterol Patent Litigation: Brandeis Univ.

v. East Side Ovens, Inc., 1:2012cv01508: Alina Liao

(10/01/2012 - 12/31/2012)

113.75 $425.00 $48,343.75

Professional

Services

[CHOLESTEROL] Cholesterol Patent Litigation: Brandeis Univ.

v. East Side Ovens, Inc., 1:2012cv01508: Nathan Snow

(10/01/2012 - 12/31/2012)

86.75 $455.00 $39,471.25

Professional

Services

[CHOLESTEROL] Cholesterol Patent Litigation: Brandeis Univ.

v. East Side Ovens, Inc., 1:2012cv01508: Allison Crowley

(10/01/2012 - 12/31/2012)

20.00 $275.00 $5,500.00

Professional

Services

[CHOLESTEROL] Cholesterol Patent Litigation: Brandeis Univ.

v. East Side Ovens, Inc., 1:2012cv01508: Andy Vassallo

(10/01/2012 - 12/31/2012)

67.25 $495.00 $33,288.75

Professional

Services

[CHOLESTEROL] Cholesterol Patent Litigation: Brandeis Univ.

v. East Side Ovens, Inc., 1:2012cv01508: Jeremy Skog

(10/01/2012 - 12/31/2012)

38.75 $495.00 $19,181.25

Professional

Services

[CHOLESTEROL] Cholesterol Patent Litigation: Brandeis Univ.

v. East Side Ovens, Inc., 1:2012cv01508: Leonard Sabetti

(10/01/2012 - 12/31/2012)

16.00 $455.00 $7,280.00

Product Courtesy discount 1.00 -$170,000.00 -$170,000.00

Amount Due $46,065.00

From Criterion Economics

4512 Edmunds Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20007

Tel: (202) 518-5121, (202) 333-2699

U.S. Tax ID: 52-2190786

Invoice For Criterion

Economics

Hon. Richard A. Posner

Circuit Judge

U.S. Court of Appeals for the

Seventh Circuit

219 South Dearborn Street

Chicago, IL 60604

Invoice ID CHOLESTEROL-Q2-2013

Issue Date 01/07/2013

Due Date 01/07/2013 (upon receipt)

Subject Court-appointed neutral expert economic

analysis of damages for patent infringement:

Brandeis Univ. v. East Side Ovens, Inc.,

1:2012cv01508

Page 1 of 2
Notes

PAYABLE IN U.S. DOLLARS.

Wire Transfers:

Swift code: PNCCUS33

Routing code: 031000053

Account no. 5303199726

Bank: PNC, 1913 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20036

Page 2 of 2
EPA SANITIZED Page 1 of 11
 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 2 of 11
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 3 of 11
 

EPA SANITIZED Page 4 of 11
 

EPA SANITIZED Page 5 of 11
EPA SANITIZED Page 6 of 11
 

 

 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 7 of 11
 

EPA SANITIZED Page 8 of 11
 

 

 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 9 of 11
 

 

 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 10 of 11
 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 11 of 11
#### Edward A. Fleckenstein, as Administrator D. B. N. of the Estate of Herbert T. Kerrigan, Deceased, Appellant, v. Harold A. Nehrbas et al., Respondents. In the Matter of the Estate of Herbert T. Kerrigan, Deceased. Edward A. Fleckenstein, as Administrator of the Estate of Herbert T. Kerrigan, Deceased, Appellant; Fireman’s Fund Insurance Company, Respondent.

In an action against stockbrokers (defendants Nehrbas et al„ trading as Parrish & Co.) to recover damages by reason of their having guaranteed the decedent’s forged signatures on certain stock certificates, such guarantee having been procured by his widow prior to his death, which action was transferred from the Supreme Court to the Surrogate’s Court and there consolidated with a reopened accounting proceeding, Edward A. Fleckenstein, as plaintiff and as administrator *de bonis non*of the decedent’s estate, appeals from an order of the Surrogate’s Court, Nassau County, dated March 10, 1964, which denied his motion: (1) to dismiss the defenses pleaded by the defendant stockbrokers (CPLR 3211, subd. [b]); or (2) in the alternative, for summary judgment in his favor and against said defendants (CPLR 3212). Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. In our opinion, whether the complaint states a cause of action predicated upon a theory of conversion or upon a theory of negligence, both of which find some support in its allegations, will depend upon the facts adduced upon trial, and particularly upon the facts as to the circumstances under which the decedent’s name was written on the certificates of stock. The issues of fact which we held precluded the granting of summary judgment to the defendants on the prior appeal in this action (16 A D 2d 811) similarly preclude the granting of the relief now sought by the plaintiff administrator. Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
FTC Consumer Alert

Federal Trade Commission Bureau of Consumer Protection Office of Consumer & Business Education

1-877-FTC-HELP FOR THE CONSUMER

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION ftc.gov

June 2006

Vets: Delete Unsolicited Offers by Email;

Don’t Disclose Personal Information

to Unsolicited Callers

In the wake of the recent data breach at the Department of Veterans’ Affairs (VA), the Federal 

Trade Commission, the nation’s consumer protection agency, is cautioning veterans and their families 

to be on the alert for scams that target their personal information. Law enforcers say that in the past, 

fraudsters have taken advantage of people in vulnerable situations through email and the telephone.

Law enforcers say that fraudsters might use various techniques, including email or the telephone, 

to deceive consumers into disclosing their credit card numbers, bank account information, Social 

Security numbers, passwords, or other sensitive personal information. Phishing is an email-based 

scam — an email that appears to come from a bank or other organization that asks you to verify 

account information, and then directs you to a bogus website whose only purpose is to trick you into 

divulging your personal information. Fraudsters also lie on the telephone about who they are to get 

someone to disclose personal information. Regardless of the way they get your information, scammers 

could use it to commit identity theft or fraud.

The FTC offers this advice for veterans and their families to deter ill-meaning phishers and callers:

• Don’t give out your personal information over the phone, through the mail, or over the Internet unless you initiated the contact and know — or can verify — who you are dealing with. 

• Never click on links sent in unsolicited emails. Instead, type in a Web address you know to be 

accurate. 

• The VA, other government agencies, and legitimate businesses do not contact people by email 

or telephone to ask them for — or to confirm — Social Security numbers or other personal 

information. 

For more information about online scams and frauds, visit OnguardOnline.gov, which provides 

practical tips from the federal government and the technology industry to help you be on guard against 

Internet fraud, secure your computer, and protect your personal information.

The FTC works for the consumer to prevent fraudulent, deceptive, and unfair business practices 

in the marketplace and to provide information to help consumers spot, stop, and avoid them. To file a 

complaint or to get free information on consumer issues, visit ftc.gov or call toll-free, 

1-877-FTC-HELP (1-877-382-4357); TTY: 1-866-653-4261. The FTC enters Internet, telemarketing, 

identity theft, and other fraud-related complaints into Consumer Sentinel, a secure, online database 

available to hundreds of civil and criminal law enforcement agencies in the U.S. and abroad.
**EXHIBIT 31.2**
I, Don T. Scartz, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of EMS Technologies,Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, includingits consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;
(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end ofthe period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in thecase of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting.
   By: /s/ Don T. Scartz  Don T. Scartz Executive Vice President,Chief Financial Officer andTreasurer (PrincipalFinancial Officer)
Date: 11/11/04
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Chester L. DeBiaso, Appellant.

(Appeal No. 1.)

[832 NYS2d 838]—

Appeal from a judgment of the Niagara County Court (Peter L. Broderick, Sr., J.), rendered June 13, 2003. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed *(see People v Hidalgo,*91 NY2d 733, 737 [1998]). Present—Scudder, P.J., Centra, Lunn, Peradotto and Pine, JJ.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-1059

MANUEL ALVALLEROS-AREVALO, a/k/a Manuel Dejesus Alvarado, 

a/k/a Manuel Dejesus Alvayero Arevalo, a/k/a Manuel 

Alvallero, 

Petitioner, 

v. 

LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General, 

Respondent. 

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration 

Appeals.

Submitted: August 17, 2015 Decided: September 2, 2015

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. 

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Jay S. Marks, LAW OFFICES OF JAY S. MARKS, LLC, Silver Spring, 

Maryland, for Petitioner. Benjamin C. Mizer, Principal Deputy 

Assistant Attorney General, Ernesto H. Molina, Jr., Assistant 

Director, Anthony P. Nicastro, Senior Litigation Counsel, Office 

of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, 

Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2

PER CURIAM: 

Manuel Alvalleros-Arevalo (Arevalo), a native and citizen 

of El Salvador, petitions for review of an order of the Board of 

Immigration Appeals dismissing his appeal from the Immigration 

Judge’s order denying his applications for asylum, withholding 

of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture. 

We deny the petition for review. 

Arevalo disputes the conclusion that he failed to qualify 

for the relief of withholding of removal. “Withholding of 

removal is available under 8 U.S.C. § 1231(b)(3) [(2012)] if the 

alien shows that it is more likely than not that [his] life or 

freedom would be threatened in the country of removal because of 

[his] race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular 

social group, or political opinion.” Gomis v. Holder, 571 F.3d 

353, 359 (4th Cir. 2009) (internal quotation marks omitted); 

see 8 U.S.C. § 1231(b)(3). We have reviewed the record and 

conclude that substantial evidence supports the agency’s 

determination that Arevalo failed to demonstrate a clear 

probability of future persecution on account of a protected 

ground. Because the evidence does not compel us to conclude to 

the contrary, we uphold the denial of relief. See Gomis, 

571 F.3d at 359-60. 

We also uphold as supported by substantial evidence the 

finding below that Arevalo did not demonstrate that it is more 
3

likely than not that he would be tortured if removed to

El Salvador so as to qualify for protection under the Convention 

Against Torture. 8 C.F.R. § 1208.16(c)(2) (2014). 

We accordingly deny the petition for review. We dispense 

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process. 

PETITION DENIED
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

EASTERN DIVISION 

VENTAS REALTY, LIMITED ) 

PARTNERSHIP, ) 

) 

Plaintiff, ) 

) No. 12-CV-3107 

) 

v. ) Judge Ronald A. Guzman 

) 

) Magistrate Judge Sidney I Schenkier 

ALC CVMA, LLC, ALC GGMG, LLC ) 

ALC HTIF, LLC, ALC PEDG, LLC, ALC ) 

TPCG, LLC, ALC TISSC, LLC, ALC ) 

TSKG, LLC AND ALC WRWG, LLC, and ) 

ASSISTED LIVING CONCEPTS, INC. ) 

Defendants. 

ALL DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER 

FROM CERTAIN DISCOVERY 

All defendants named in the above caption, by their counsel, respectfully move this 

Court for a order protecting them from certain improper discovery. This motion is brought 

pursuant to FRCP 26(c)(1). Specifically, all defendants seek an order striking two 

intenogatories, two requests for production of documents and a 30(b)(6) notice of deposition 

propounded by plaintiff Ventas Realty, Limited Partnership ("Ventas"). In light of this request, 

the defendants also seek dispensation of the need to produce a privilege log of these uniformly 

protected matters. These discovery requests seek, in impermissibly broad terms, documents and 

information concerning a privileged and confidential investigation being conducted by the 

Assisted Living Concepts, Inc.'s Audit Committee of its Board of Directors. A memorandum of 

law and two declarations are being filed in establish the grounds of this motion. This will certify 

1 

Case: 1:12-cv-03107 Document #: 38 Filed: 06/05/12 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:1259
that prior to bringing this motion, the parties conducted a conference, by telephone, in 

accordance with Local Rule 37.2 in an effort to resolve this matter amicably and without the 

need for a motion. On behalf of the defendants, Attorneys John Rothstein and Len Shifflett 

participated, and on behalf of the plaintiff, Attorneys Roger Stetson and Rupa Rajagopalm 

participated. The phone conference was held on the morning of June 5, 2012. After sincere 

efforts to resolve the matter, that parties were unable to avoid the need for assistance by the 

Court. 

Dated this 5 day of June, 2012. 

/s/ John A. Rothstein 

John A. Rothstein 

QUARLES & BRADY LLP 

411 E. Wisconsin Ave. 

Milwaukee, WI 53202 

414-277-5351 

John.Rothstein@quarles.com 

Leonard S. Shifflett 

ARDC # 2587432 

QUARLES & BRADY LLP 

300 N. LaSalle St. Suite 4000 

Chicago, IL 60654-3406 

312-715-5000 

Leonard.Schifflett@quarles.com 

Attorneys for all Defendants 

2 

Case: 1:12-cv-03107 Document #: 38 Filed: 06/05/12 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:1260
Case: 1:12-cv-01255 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/22/12 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:1

Case: 1:12-cv-01255 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/22/12 Page 2 of 10 PageID #:2

Case: 1:12-cv-01255 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/22/12 Page 3 of 10 PageID #:3

Case: 1:12-cv-01255 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/22/12 Page 4 of 10 PageID #:4

Case: 1:12-cv-01255 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/22/12 Page 5 of 10 PageID #:5

Case: 1:12-cv-01255 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/22/12 Page 6 of 10 PageID #:6

Case: 1:12-cv-01255 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/22/12 Page 7 of 10 PageID #:7

Case: 1:12-cv-01255 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/22/12 Page 8 of 10 PageID #:8

Case: 1:12-cv-01255 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/22/12 Page 9 of 10 PageID #:9

Case: 1:12-cv-01255 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/22/12 Page 10 of 10 PageID #:10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 5.1.1

Eastern Division

Christopher V Langone

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:12−cv−02073

Honorable Thomas M. Durkin

Patrick Kaiser, et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Monday, March 11, 2013:

 MINUTE entry before Honorable Thomas M. Durkin:Hearing held on defendant's

Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim [12] on 3/11/2013. Simultaneous briefs,

limited to 5 pages in length, addressing the issue of jurisdictional question are to be filed

on or before 3/22/13. Court will rule by mail. Mailed notice(srn, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:12-cv-02073 Document #: 25 Filed: 03/11/13 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:105
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS, EASTERN DIVISION

SOURCEBOOKS, INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.! ! ! ! ! ! CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:11-CV-07738

! ! ! ! ! ! The Honorable Amy J. St. Eve

ANITA CLENNEY,

Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff,

v.

REED SMITH LLP and

DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP,

Third-Party Defendants.

DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND ANSWER

Defendant Anita Clenney, by counsel, moves the Court, as provided by 

Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a), for leave to amend her answer. As explained in the 

memorandum of law filed contemporaneously with this motion, the Defendant 

seeks to elaborate on certain affirmative defenses she has pled and to provide 

additional facts in support thereof, which makes the amendment of her answer 

timely, necessary, and appropriate. 

!!!!!!!!! ANITA CLENNEY

! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! By Counsel

Case: 1:11-cv-07738 Document #: 23 Filed: 01/06/12 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:154
Adam M. Salzman! ! !

Adam M. Salzman (ARDC 6287280)

The Salzman Law Office

1111 South Boulevard

Oak Park, IL 60302

(708) 320-9888

Jeffrey V. Mehalic (Admitted pro hac vice)

Law Offices of Jeffrey V. Mehalic

2011 Quarrier Street

P. O. Box 11133

Charleston, WV 25339-1133

(304) 346-3462

Counsel for Defendant Anita Clenney

2

Case: 1:11-cv-07738 Document #: 23 Filed: 01/06/12 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:155
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS, EASTERN DIVISION

SOURCEBOOKS, INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.! ! ! ! ! ! CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:11-CV-07738

! ! ! ! ! ! The Honorable Amy J. St. Eve

ANITA CLENNEY,

Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff,

v.

REED SMITH LLP and

DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP,

Third-Party Defendants.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, Jeffrey V. Mehalic, hereby certify that on the 6th day of January, 2012, I 

electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of this Court using the CM/ECF 

system which will send notification of such filing to the following: 

Douglas A. Albritton, Esquire

Peter M. Stasiewicz, Esquire

Reed Smith LLP

10 South Wacker Drive, 40th Floor

Chicago, IL 60606-7507

!!!!!!! /s/ Jeffrey V. Mehalic! ! ! 

! ! ! ! ! ! ! Jeffrey V. Mehalic (Admitted pro hac vice)

3

Case: 1:11-cv-07738 Document #: 23 Filed: 01/06/12 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:156