alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §455. Miscellaneous authorities

#### (a) Seal

The Department shall have a seal, whose design is subject to the approval of the President.

#### (b) Participation of members of the Armed Forces

With respect to the Department, the Secretary shall have the same authorities that the Secretary of Transportation has with respect to the Department of Transportation under section 324 of title 49.

#### (c) Redelegation of functions

Unless otherwise provided in the delegation or by law, any function delegated under this chapter may be redelegated to any subordinate.

#### (d) Investigation of certain violent acts, shootings, and mass killings

#### (1) In general

At the request of an appropriate law enforcement official of a State or political subdivision, the Secretary, through deployment of the Secret Service or United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, may assist in the investigation of violent acts and shootings occurring in a place of public use, and in the investigation of mass killings and attempted mass killings. Any assistance provided by the Secretary under this subsection shall be presumed to be within the scope of Federal office or employment.

#### (2) Definitions

For purposes of this subsection—

(A) the term "mass killings" means 3 or more killings in a single incident; and

(B) the term "place of public use" has the meaning given that term under section 2332f(e)(6) of title 18.

(Pub. L. 107–296, title VIII, §875, Nov. 25, 2002, 116 Stat. 2244; Pub. L. 112–265, §2(b), Jan. 14, 2013, 126 Stat. 2435.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in subsec. (c), was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 107–296, Nov. 25, 2002, 116 Stat. 2135, known as the Homeland Security Act of 2002, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 101 of this title and Tables.

#### Amendments

2013—Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 112–265 added subsec (d).
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington D. C.  20549

Form 10-Q
Quarterly Report Under Section 13 or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For Quarter Ended March 31, 2002
Commission File No. 1-3871

CALIFORNIA-ENGELS MINING COMPANY
 (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

State of California
 (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)

94-0357560 (I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)
Address: 117 Crescent Street, P. O. Box 778,
Greenville, California  95947-0778
 (Address of principal executive office) (Zip Code)

(530) 284-6191
 (Registrant's telephone number including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all
reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file
such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements
for the past 90 days.

Yes   X       No

CLASS

Capital Stock, par value: $0.25 per share.

OUTSTANDING AT MARCH 31, 2002: 759,315.94 shares.

Filing Contains 3 pages.

<page>
<PAGE>
CALIFORNIA-ENGELS MINING COMPANY
FORM 10QSB
FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED March 31, 2002

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

The Registrant falls within the provisions of Rule 13a - 13 (c) (2)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended, and claims
exemption thereunder from the requirement to file Part 1.

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.  Legal Proceedings.

          None

Item 2.  Changes in Securities.

          None

Item 3.  Defaults upon Senior Securities.

          None

Item 4.  Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.

          None

Item 5.  Other Information.

          None

Item 6.  Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K.

          None

<page>
<PAGE>
CALIFORNIA-ENGELS MINING COMPANY
FORM 10QSB
FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED March 31, 2002

SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15 (d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934,the registrant has duly caused this
report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly
authorized.


CALIFORNIA-ENGELS MINING COMPANY
Registrant



May 1, 2002                          By: /s/ Norman A. Lamb
                                     Norman A. Lamb, President
                                     and Chief Executive Officer


May 1, 2002                          By: /s/ James E. Brousseau
                                     James E. Brousseau, Secretary-
                                     Treasurer and Chief
                                     Financial Officer
<PAGE>   1
                                                                EXHIBIT 20.04


               AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO AGREEMENT OF PURCHASE AND SALE


     THIS AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO AGREEMENT OF PURCHASE AND SALE is made as of May
31, 1996 by and between CALIFORNIA JOCKEY CLUB, a Delaware corporation
("Seller") and LEE IACOCCA & ASSOCIATES, INC., a Michigan corporation
("Purchaser").

     A.  Seller and Purchaser have entered into an Agreement of Purchase and 
Sale (the "Agreement") dated December 21, 1995 relating to certain real property
located in San Mateo, California and commonly known as the Bay Meadows Training
Track (the "Subject Real Property"), which is a part of property owned by Seller
and referred to in the Agreement as "Bay Meadows."

     B.  Seller and Purchaser entered into Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement as
of March 5, 1996 which extended Purchaser's time to conduct its due diligence
until May 31, 1996.

     C.  In light of various factors which have come to the parties' attention
relating to the cost of off-site improvements necessary for development of the
Subject Real Property, Purchaser has requested and Seller is willing to grant
additional time for Purchaser to conduct its due diligence.

     NOW THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:

     1.  The Approval Date, as defined in Section 3.1 of the Agreement is 
amended to be June 28, 1996.

     2.  This Amendment No. 2 may be signed in counterparts, each of which shall
constitute an original as against any party whose signature appears thereon and
all of which shall constitute one and the same instrument.

     3.  All other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain
unchanged.

     4.  As of the date of this Amendment No. 2, neither party has any claims
against the other arising out of or relating to the Agreement.


 CALIFORNIA JOCKEY CLUB                 LEE IACOCCA & ASSOCIATES, INC.

 By:_________________________           By:_________________________

 Its:_________________________          Its:_________________________
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          85,266
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  371,956
<ALLOWANCES>                                    14,854
<INVENTORY>                                    407,138
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               704,045
<PP&E>                                         985,997
<DEPRECIATION>                                 736,288
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 953,754
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          224,724
<BONDS>                                        207,659
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  2,361,440
<COMMON>                                       969,834
<OTHER-SE>                                 (2,809,903)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   953,754
<SALES>                                        477,152
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               478,189
<CGS>                                          366,662
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  110,802
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,140
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,209
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,624)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (922)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,702)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,702)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

Case No. 5D22-1775

LT Case No. 2020-CF-00372

_____________________________

JAMIE L. ARMSTRONG,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Putnam County.

Howard O. McGillin, Jr., Judge.

Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender, and Allison A. Havens, Assistant 

Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Richard A. Pallas, 

Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

August 22, 2023 

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LAMBERT, EISNAUGLE, and KILBANE, JJ., concur.
2

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion 

under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.

_____________________________
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

JESUS SANCHEZ-CARRANZA,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 11-30211

D.C. No. 4:10-cr-00131-BLW-14

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Idaho

B. Lynn Winmill, Chief District Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 11, 2012** 

Portland, Oregon

Before: SILVERMAN, CLIFTON, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Jesus Sanchez-Carranza appeals his jury conviction and sentence. SanchezCarranza challenges the jury verdict, asserting that the evidence was not sufficient

FILED

OCT 15 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2

to sustain a conviction for conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine beyond a

reasonable doubt. He further objects to the district judge's failure to grant him a

minimal participant downward adjustment under U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2. We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm the jury conviction and

sentence.

1. The district court did not err in denying the motion for judgment of acquittal,

because the evidence was sufficient to sustain the conviction. There was ample

circumstantial and direct evidence showing that Sanchez-Carranza made an

agreement with a co-conspirator to distribute methamphetamine. Specifically,

Sanchez-Carranza’s co-conspirator testified at trial, establishing that (1) he

contacted Sanchez-Carranza to get the methamphetamine to sell to Detective

Marley; (2) he received the methamphetamine from Sanchez-Carranza; and (3) he

gave Sanchez-Carranza some of the money after the purchase, to pay for the

methamphetamine. This same testimony also provides sufficient evidence that a

jury could conclude Sanchez-Carranza knowingly and intentionally participated in

the conspiracy. See United States v. Herrera-Gonzalez, 263 F.3d 1092, 1097 (9th

Cir. 2001) (“The evidence of [defendant’s] participation in the activities of the

conspiracy with knowledge of its criminal activity and an intention to further that

activity takes this case out of the ‘mere presence’ line of authority.”). Proof of an
3

overt act is not required to establish a conspiracy under 21 U.S.C. § 846. United

States v. Suarez, 682 F.3d 1214, 1219 (9th Cir. 2012).

2. The district court did not clearly err in denying the minimal participant

downward adjustment. To the contrary, the record clearly indicated that SanchezCarranza supplied the methamphetamine. Sanchez-Carranza did not offer any

evidence showing that he was substantially less culpable than his co-participant in

the offenses. 

AFFIRMED.
#### Logan *et al. v.*Hope.

March 1, 1913.

Action for damages. Before Judge Fite. Gordon superior court. December *26,*1911.

*Sam P. Maddox*and *Neel & Neel,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Eubanks & Mebane*and *Henson & Milner,*contra.

Beck, J.

1. The court erred in charging the jury that “you may believe that witness who has the best means of knowing the facts about which he or she testifies and the least inducement to swear falsely, and with these rules determine what the evidence is,” in that this charge omitted all reference to the credibility of the witnesses as being one of the matters to be considered by the jury in passing upon the question of the weight to be given to the testimony of such witness.

2. Relatively to a person on a public highway, who is injured by vicious or dangerous horses which have been hired to a customer by a liveryman, if such injury arises from the exercise of the vicious propensity, the owner will be held liable therefor, if he hired such horses, knowing them to have vicious or dangerous propensities, or having reasonable ground for so knowing, and was wanting in ordinary care for the protection of the public against injury from the exercise of such propensities.

*(а)*The questions of proximate cause and of the exercise of ordinary care by the injured person are for the jury.

(б) The following charge was not an accurate statement of the law: “If the horses were not reasonably gentle and safe, or the lines were not reasonably strong and secure for the use intended, and the defendants knew it, or could by the exercise of ordinary care have known it, then the plaintiff can recover, unless those driving the horses were negligent and were the proximate cause of the injury.”

3. In so far as a suit to recover damages by one injured on a highway depends not on injury by a vicious animal in the exercise of his vicious propensity, but proceeds on account of negligence in regard to providing defective harness for horses let out by him, by reason of which such horses ran away and could not be controlled, the duty is on the liveryman, in providing harness, to use ordinary care to furnish suitable harness for the driving and control of the horses hired.

4. Where the question is one of the opinion, a non-expert witness may state the facts upon which he bases it, and then state to the jury his opinion thus founded. It should appear that the opinion given is thus based, and what the facts were on which the opinion is predicated. In the present case, the witnesses did not sufficiently give the facts upon which they based their opinions, and it was error to admit the testimony objected to.

5. There was not such a lack of substantial compliance with the law as to the bringing- of a brief of evidence to this court as would authorize this court .to disregard the brief of evidence contained in the record.

*Judgment reversed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
Mr. Guy Turner ccunty Auditor Denton, Texas Dew Sir:

ttm:, Your re~uo~nI.on onuuc.-



### chra, the Yatlonal and the 0f:'icers Reserve States and enlisted GuclrJ, the Yatlonal ?ucrd I;esorvo, nnd the Cr.yanized Fe-__._ .-.-..-_- ..--. -__.. ...-- .-...- ..- . ~~~.---.~.. ..__ _,~.~~,.~. __

IAT.Guy Turner, January 9, 1939, Pace 2

oar in the Offloerc Xeeerve Corps of the United States, or an enli3tcd xan In the Crzmized :I~s~:rvcs of thu United States; or retired officers of t!?e United 2ta.tes Amy, Xcvy, r1r.dl’srlne colvs ( ret:rcd fmd rctirfd mrrant officers and

enlisted mn of t.he United !?tates lriny, Xavy, and :.‘nrine Corp3, fron holllnr: in conjunction v:ith such offic:, any othcr~‘ office or position of honor, trust or profit, under this stutc or the Vnited States, or from votin,? et any Election; General, Special or Primry Jn this State when otherxisc qualif icd. [Eke. 40, IIrt. 16, adopted election !!ov. 0, 1932.) In the case of Cc-,1 VS. ‘:‘o:ns~:nd, 14 S:, 2i5, ***Any of**  **the off** **’ ic~::**  rimed in t,he cx- : oeptiorl my bc held r!jtl; any otl:cr office wheths rimed in ihe exception or not
.” The case ,of Figures VS. Stab, 99 S:‘!, 4112, holds :

“County Attorney may be a Xotary

Fublic also. ” OnJune 1, 1927, this denartqent held, in an opinion w!tten by Hon. H. Grad;- Chandler, Assistant Attorney Genercl, that a County Judso is nor. disqualified fro3 holdim the offloe? of County !ud@ and I:otary Pub110 nt the same tins.

On April 27, 1931, t%is departsent hold, in an opinion by IIon. ‘iverctt 7”

. Jo:tn:<on, Assistant Attorney Caneml, that the 0ff10t: of County 3lerk 13 inoonpatitlc vith t3c office of :‘otnr:! I’ublic and that a p-rzon !+,olZin:~:t:ll~:offioc of Zount7 Clerk oould not ot the sme tLns hold office of t:otary Public.

On Februlrp l.2, 1975, this dcpartxnt held, in thr: opinion b:; iion. Joe J. Al!!~q, ;,:;si zLl3nt ;2ttorney Cccoral, tt1et t.!-lc!Officio or xot-:r:; Tu?:l!z c!i?LTrlc13. Guy Turner, January 9, 1059, P&GE3

collector wzrc not Inconpatiblo. A copy of this opinion 1s Bnclosod. This depnrtwnt concurs v:it!: this opinion.

Therefore , you aro respectful.ly odvi3cd that it is the opinion of tkiis depnrtmnt that the Tax .%sseseor- I colleator atxJhis deputies arc not protlbitcd by law frog holdin: t3c ofrlce OSXotcry j:ublic v:'r!lle holdin. their offices of Tax Assessor-Collector or as deputies of suoh office. Yours respeotfully
EXHIBIT 10.1

                    ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF ENTITLEMENT TO STOCK

      Pursuant to: i) that certain Memorandum of Agreement ("MOA") executed as
of April 4, 2000, by Computerized Thermal Imaging, Inc., a Nevada corporation
("CTI"), Bales Scientific Inc., a California corporation ("BSI"), Maurice J.
Bales and Maurice J. Bales and Marianne J. Bales as Trustees of the Maurice J.
Bales and Marianne J. Bales Trust; and ii) CTI's  acquisition of all of the
outstanding and issued shares of BSI's common stock as contemplated in the
MOA, CTI hereby acknowledges and affirms that the following persons and
entities are entitled to and shall receive the number of shares of CTI's
common stock equal to the values set forth below, valued at the Bid Price (as
defined in the MOA) as of April 17, 2000.  Said shares shall be issued to said
persons and entities immediately upon the approval by the United States
Securities and Exchange Commission of the registration statement that CTI
shall file on or about May 1, 2000.

     ISSUEE                                                 VALUE
     ------                                                 -----

Maurice J. Bales and Marianne J. Bales                   $4,700,000
as Trustees for the Maurice J. Bales
and Marianne J. Bales Trust

Constance Haber Stevenson                                $  250,000

Southeastern Neuroscience Institute                      $  440,000
Profit Sharing Plan for the Benefit
of Jacob Green, M.D.

Jacob Green, M.D.                                        $  110,000



                                   DATED: April 17, 2000

                                   COMPUTERIZED THERMAL IMAGING, INC.


                                   By:     /s/ David B. Johnston
                                           --------------------------
                                           DAVID B. JOHNSTON
                                           President and Chief
                                           Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THIS FORM
10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          31,673
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   41,265
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,685
<INVENTORY>                                     23,441
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               119,034
<PP&E>                                          55,067
<DEPRECIATION>                                  33,443
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 177,660
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           36,308
<BONDS>                                         57,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,663
<OTHER-SE>                                      81,013
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    82,676
<SALES>                                         42,935
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                42,935
<CGS>                                           27,331
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   48,623
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   555
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 348
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,036)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (2,173)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,863)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (20,997)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.26)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.26)


</TABLE>
C&U9CV cf (L\KX^\XVAl_ W?XALS
*X\\X STAX^. 0V- TXY&S £X^S>-\ V\^-\XbV\ £tfk^am«SE&y\ c^ TXM£ To^XUcL WniTlQM "TiE)-TV\X UfcKl&TlPtfAX XW$*X"b ^ "WL C&\ritf ^ QSXVMV^L t\\>?EPlLS CX<\ fc^cViXYSA C^O. CV S»VAvA CCoCT^ cWa-S "sr\ v^\Kn<Xn W\\\. Ck_X^f\\\1,0» ^5yC 

### ""Xro^A's* (Lfce>\\V^ ~^CvS> t=L Wn*_ C^£fcc*<s\_ felt ^^X.Ua\ V\S^CLkA\ \s\ CliQ^^V. \Ju.



## P^nVn^cwc oco^MlC^oA Vo W/W. Clc^A- 6V V^WicA'ki "X\v^<^ .^u^vslsnAen en ,m RECEIVED IN 

# COURTOF^^^s COURTOFCRi^LAPPEAlS SEP .820,6 SEP2620,S Abel Acosta, Clerk AbelACOSta,ClerkXL 

### vn^v'\Co*o, \^, <vSc3c'^l^<- X4 <S)^U. "XW_ "^kv\\fcc\*_r Vv_s_ \-\sA- t^£*A}^3r*fcA c^^A XEL. 

### V_r\^_V

_ \W. VLRiVi-cV tiK VtoVi^cAs, 6xoA-^_A yvs,. v^VW^Woojo \tfc_vr\ ^^xV»fcc\t_.<r_f
CXT\ck Q^ctLXNO. Vvr\^_ (Ac_cicA\;y^?L. V^<- V;\n<cv<\ xSr\<L. VcX%Vn^v\ x^c- V_Vs£_vvf-\<yr\C\r\ji Ytj_<lV\^-CN«i_r . Vt-cs.<$iV- ""^Arc X V_vn;V \!&\ prv\ sss<a X^_rt^ 1951131 ^^vv^^^^ClcAcMxvjiY^^0^ XS80OA_ CQ_rV*\VvA WvCvX cvVfUV cvcnX cC^rc^cV Cc_Cs.O(. C_V VuVJl c\V_c>\Jfc_ QccncA 

### V^x-0__^C_\C\<\ V\c<V ^Vc\\a(\ Wr ^L*W_>R,\c_C\ cV~%V<yaV_ Vfc VP-\v_ cTvt_k\V\*Cv 

### Vii<- ^'xS^^Vxc-cxc^r-vx \A^_J\QJo-_ ,VncvQ, \^>fcx-\ Ve>rv*_,OorA \c,u W^- WwA. A^vYSCCvCU 

# "\^c_7<W \Q4vV5. ^AxvT^L.X^nW t_^ V\\;^ XW JLlf^ A^X X.^x^^Vj,c^AJ\^.~\A^(LXAV \kcv=)-\-\'21 < V_*__<\^ ^v^m4\u \CsCx_fc\rCVrc_VA *\cnV\rs^_""^_sVci V VW\V c_V ^ZX*tXC_S_ \_»\^CvA:vcN^\Vr t_V Q_r'\<v\\oA ^Sl*\$^.Va <_V afcjr\o<\A \W*V \V^\fc\Vv^C}\>r\Cs. ^<^i_^'5_fNOr c_sVVcv_V CsaA tkr\ii>.e_V ^CxS_«_VA C_Uo\^_A ^V* XV_*A

«?"•""X>c_cxx- £_\clAl \_-Y\<i_c\5^_v~\ i_\"""V\<xnv_Vt_, vS&_ VcVr'Vc\v%o\Vro<r VSx'^'coc'Cj?,c_xnc_*x-v_x *-4W\Sl_\_A . X\VS_SV. \rVW_ VW\^ ^KsX:\^cv cv_cnAV^C\c\Ck "Vr V>, V\r\\_ c^^^cv^:\txCN cX VW £_t_v_<\ v

Ql. 

## XV^J^fc- AoAr^_-"5_\:Cv.«>rx^ ^Arx\^ \\VX^v\r CoC\A vcS_Vv_OT\ * V. Vb <*s\_\ c_KcV\-^V_ ,=S_\-\C_Voo.k-\ V=k\V\V>i'oo . AsC_ vC0J3yV_i\i^V VVxCcV v_vfc\_. X\vV\V\_\ <cxW_ cV \W_ V.&\_\rV< fuVwo, c_vcx tp\_i V^VV's^cx

RECEIVED IN COURTOF CRIMINAL APPEALS SEP 26 2018 Abe!Acosta,Cferk ~\_s£* Q_> <_vScAc Vvb Z^fc. er 

### ^^ V-\WV -x^cs v^xnn