CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD 

.A, 

APCDIAQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM - Page 1 

District: South Coast Air Quality Management District 

Rule No: 2181218.1 Date AmendedJAdopted: May 14, 1999 

Rule Title: Continuous Emission Monitoring 1 Continuous Emission Monitoring Performance Specifications 

Date Submitted to ARB: If an Amended Rule, Date Last Amended : August 7, 198 1 (Rule 21 8) 

Is the Rule Intended to be Sent to the U.S. EPA as a SIP Revision ( ) Yes (x) No 

If NO, do not complete remainder of form. 

District Contact: John Higuchi Phone Number: (909) 396-2267 

Narrative Summary of New Rule or Rule Changes: 

(x) Amended Rule: Rule 218 deletes obsolete language, clarifies administrative requirements, provides flexibility, 

deletes the stack monitoring svstem performance specifications and revises the rule title from Stack Monitoring to 

Continuous Emission Monitoring. 

(x) New Rule : Rule 218.1 incorporates the continuous emission monitoring system performance specifications. as 

well as revise and identifies performance specifications to meet AQMD requirements for apvroval. 

Pollutant(s) Regulated by the Rule (Circle): ROG NOx SO2 CO TAC(name) 

A.~ 

n. EFFECT ON EMISSIONS 

Complete this section ONLY for rules that, when implemented, will result in quantifiable changes in emissions. 

Attach reference(s) for emission factor(s) and other information. Attach calculation sheet showing how the emission 

information provided below was determined. 

Net Effect on Emissions: ( ) Increase ( ) Decrease ( ) NIA 

Emission Reduction Commitment in SIP for this Source Category: tonsly ear 

SCCICES Code Affected: If a SCC Code is Assigned, SIC Code Affected: 

(NOTE: If more than one SCC or CES code or more than one combination of SCC and SIC codes are needed, fill out 

the following information on a separate form for each combination of codes.) 

Inventory Year Used to Calculate Changes in Emissions: Area 

Affected: 

Future Year Control Profile Estimate (Provide information on as many years as possible) 
Reductions TonsNear Control Percent Control Control 

Year (Increases) Subiect to Rule Level Control Level Factor 

TonsNear Baseline 

- 
CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD 

w,w APCDIAQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM - Page 3 

III. SOURCESIATTAINMENT STATUS 

District is: ( ) Attainment ( ) Nonattainment ( ) Split 

Approximate Total Number of Small (400 TPY) Sources Controlled by Rule: 

Percent in Nonattainment Area: Yo 

Number of Large (1 TPY) Sources Controlled: Percent in Nonattainment Area: YO 

Name(s) and Location(s) (city and county) of Large (1 100 TPY) Sources Controlled by Rule (Attach additional sheets 

as necessary): 

Facilitv Name Fac. ID Location City Countv Name 

IV. EMISSION REDUCTION TECHNOLOGY 

Does the Rule Include Emission Limits that are Continuous? ( ) Yes ( ) No 

If Yes, Those Limits are in Section(s) of the Rule. 

. '*_ 

Other Methods in the Rule for Achieving Emission Reductions are: 

V. OTHER REOUIREMENTS 

The Rule Contains: 

Emission Limits in Section(s): Work Practice Standards in Section(s): 

Recordkeeping Requirements in Section(s): Reporting Requirements in Section(s): 

Attach a Completed EPA SIP Apvrovabilitv Checklist - Enforceability or Provide an Equivalent 

Compliance/Enforcement Strategy Statement. 

VI. IMPACT ON AIR QUALITY PLAN 

(x) No Impact ( ) Impacts RFP ( ) Impacts attainment 

Discussion: 

d.- 

(ARBFORM - 6/93)