alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Income Driven Repayment (IDR) Notification Pilots

On March 10, President Obama announced a series of actions designed to help student loan borrowers in a Student Aid Bill of Rights, including the development and implementation of behaviorally designed pilots to identify the most effective ways to communicate with borrowers to maximize successful borrower repayment.  In an effort to improve communication to borrowers in IDR plans and ensure a smooth, on-time renewal process, Federal Student Aid (FSA) and the White House Social and Behavioral Sciences Team (SBST) are collaborating on a series of Income-Driven Repayment Plan Notification Pilots, scheduled to run from April 2015 through September 2015. 

During the first session of the negotiated rulemaking on expanding and targeting the benefits of Pay As You Earn, dated March 23, 2015 – March 25, 2015, several non-Federal negotiators on the committee asked if the communications borrowers receive before renewing their Income-Driven Repayment (IDR) plans could be revised to improve their effectiveness. 

The first IDR Notification Pilot will take place during April 2015, for cohorts of borrowers whose IDR anniversary dates occur during the month of July.  During this initial pilot, FSA and the SBST will develop communications to be sent to borrowers via e-mail that supplement the regulatorily required communications that servicers already send to borrowers.  These communications will remind borrowers to renew their Income Driven-Repayment Plan income documentation and family size.  E-mails from the Department of Education will notify borrowers that they should have received similar correspondence from their servicer and will provide a direct link into the StudentLoans.gov Income-Driven Repayment Plan application. 

The next phase of the IDR Notification Pilot will occur over two IDR renewal cycles.  FSA will require that specific Federal loan servicers with large IDR loan portfolios to suppress their notification process for borrowers whose IDR anniversary dates occur in August and September 2015.  During this time, FSA will send the regulatorily required IDR notifications and test a variety of messages to assess the impact of the communication and the influence of e-mails sent from a Department of Education e-mail address (e.g., donotreply@studentloans.gov), as opposed to a loan servicer e-mail address, on borrower IDR renewal rates.
Exhibit 32.1





Certification of the President and Chief Executive Officer


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the


Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





I, Bowen S. Diehl, President and Chief Executive Officer of Capital Southwest Corporation, certify that, to my knowledge:


1. The Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2020, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 2, 2020 (“accompanied report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


2. The information contained in the accompanied report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of Capital Southwest Corporation.


Date:  November 2, 2020By:/s/ Bowen S. DiehlBowen S. DiehlPresident and Chief Executive Officer
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Julius James Adams, Relator, v. John F. McNeill, as Superintendent of Matteawan State Hospital, Respondent.

Application by petition, sworn to January 31, 1961, for a writ of habeas corpus, denied on the ground that the petition fails to comply with section 1234 of the Civil Practice Act. Beldock, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur.
#### Moreland *vs.*Stephens, sheriff, *et al.*

1. There being no provision of law for granting- a new trial upon motion therefor, on a matter referred in term by consent of parties for decision by the judge without a jury in vacation, the denial of a new trial in such a case is not error.

2. When error is assigned upon the decision of the judge refusing a new trial, and there is no other assignment of error in the bill of exceptions, nothing is for review but the one point, and if for any reason the new trial was properly refused, the judgment will be sustained.

New trial. Courts. Vacation. Before Judge Buchanan. Heard County. At Chambers. January 27, 1879.

Moreland ruled Stephens, the sheriff, to show cause why he should not pay oyer to him certain moneys in his hands for distribution. Whitaker also claimed the fund upon an execution held by him. At the September term, 1878, an order was taken by consent, providing for the hearing of the issues thus formed by the judge in vacation. He adjudged that the sum in controversy be paid out *fro rata*to the two executions. Moreland moved for a new trial upon several grounds. It was overruled and he excepted, the sole error assigned being the refusal of such motion.

Speer & Speer, by Brief, for plaintiff in error.

C. W. Mabry, for defendants.

Bleckley, Justice.

1. The remedy given by law to correct the error of a judge of the superior court “ in any matter heard at chambers,” is a bill of exceptions. Code, §42o 1. And a motion for a new trial is not appropriate. *Lester vs.*Johnson, this term.

2. In the present case, there was no writ of error directly upon the decision made by the judge at chambers disposing *290of the money upon the rule against the sheriff; that decision was not excepted to and a bill of exceptions tendered and signed, but the dissatisfied party made a motion for a new trial, and the overruling of that motion is the subject matter of the writ of error now before us, and its only subject matter. No other error is assigned. IN ow, a motion for a new trial not being the remedy to reach any ei ror which the judge may have committed in his judgment disposing of the money, it is certain that the refusal to grant a new trial was not erroneous. This being a sufficient rea' son for the decision of the judge now under review, it is needless to look for any other.

Judgment affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Thunder Mountain Gold Inc, (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A for the period ending December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Eric T. Jones, President, Director and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Eric T. Jones

By  ____________________________________

Eric T. Jones

President, Director and Chief Executive Officer

Date:  December 19, 2011
EXHIBIT 32.1.0
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with the annual  report on Form  10-KSB of  Mountains  West
Exploration,  Inc. (the "Corporation") for the period ended December 31, 2005 as
filed with the SEC (the "Report"),  the undersigned in the capacities and on the
date indicated below, hereby certifies,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of my knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Corporation.




 /s/ Lee Wiskowski
----------------------------------------
President and Principal Executive Officer
March 31, 2006
# OAR Box 1830

Prepped by Ollie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 111 ) IV-C-7

7

Docket Number: 

# A-87-1 1 p. i

Printed 11/13/20087:20:57AM Sheet 111 of 232P. 2

% y UNITE D STATE S ENVIRONMENTA L PROTECTION AGENC Y WASHINGTON

, D.C. 2046 0

OFFIC E O F AI RAN D RADIATIO N Honorabl e Gu

y Vande r Jag t Hous e o f Representative s Washington , D . C . 2051 5 Dear Mr . Vande r Jagt : Than k yo u fo r you r letter forwardin

g th e concern s o f your constituent , Jerr

y L . Hop , about ou

r propose

d gasoline volatility regulation s an

d propose

d regulation s t o contro l vapor s generated durin g th e refuelin

g o f moto r vehicle s b y th e us e o f onboar

d canisters . Yo

u aske d us to forwar

d t o yo u an y informatio

nw e hav e o nthes e topics . As yo u know , w

e are proposin

g to contro l gasoline f. volatility

a s on e mean s o f reducin

g th e emission s o f volatil e organi c compound s (VOCs) . Thes e compound s are a majo r precurso r o f ozone , whic hi s thi s nation' s mos t widesprea d an d intractabl e ai r pollutio nproblem . Ove r 6 0 urba narea s currentl y

d o no t mee t th

e ai r quality

standar

d established fo r ozone . Motor vehicle s account fo r one-thir

d t o one-hal f of th e tota l VO

C emissions , an

d gasoline volatility reduction s represen t th

e singl e larges t remainin g sourc e o f VO

C contro l available . Ther e are a number o f comple xissue s tha t mus t b e analyzed whe nvolatility

contro l i s considered . W e hav e spen t a grea t dea l of tim

e analyzin

g thes e issue s an

d makin g ou r finding s availabl e t o al l intereste d partie s fo

r critique an

d comment . W e hel d a publi c hearin g i n Octobe r an

d hav e receive

d numerou s additiona l comment s o n thi s rulemaking . W e wil l fully conside r al l of thes e comment s i ndevelopin

g ou r fina l regulator

y analysis . Wit hreferenc e t

o Mr . Hop' s comment s regardin g Stage I I versu s onboar

d caniste r controls , Sectio nE (page s 31177-31182 ) of th e Augus t 19,198 7 Federa l Registe r explain s EPA' s overal l rational e fo

r proposin

g onboar

d controls . I f yo u woul d lik

e furthe r detail s o f ou r analysis , pleas e contac t Mr . Phili p Carlso nof th e Standard s Developmen t an d Suppor t Branc

hof th e Emissio nContro l Technolog y Division , 256 5 PlymouthRoad , An n Arbor , MI 4810 5 (FT S 374-827 0 o r Commercia l (313 ) 668-4270) .P. 3 J2 —• -**

- r*

- 2 -

W e wii i plac e th e lette r fro mMr
. Hop i n ou r publi c docke t an

d f»ll y conside r hi s connaent s in th e nex t phas e o f ou r rulemakin

g process . Le t m e kno w i f w e ca n b e o f furthe r assistance

. Sincerel yyours ,

. : • n v
Richar d D
. Wilso n Director , Offic e o f Mobil e Source s

cc : Docke t A-87-1 1 Docke t A-85-2 1



### I
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11

                ALPHA TECHNOLOGIES GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                      COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                       Year Ended 
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         October 31,   October 29,   October 27,
                                            1994          1995          1996
                                         -----------   -----------   -----------
<S>                                      <C>           <C>           <C>
Shares:
  Weighted average common shares 
   outstanding                            5,914,254     5,984,584     6,277,585

  Net common shares issuable on 
   exercise of stock options                429,350       620,563            --
                                         ----------    ----------    ----------
Weighted average common and common 
  equivalent shares outstanding           6,343,604     6,605,147     6,277,585
                                         ==========    ==========    ==========

Net income (loss)                        $5,290,000    $3,748,000    $ (299,000)
                                         ==========    ==========    ==========

Per share amount                         $     0.83    $     0.57    $    (0.05)
                                         ==========    ==========    ==========
</TABLE>

---------------
(1) See Note 13 to the consolidated financial statements for further information
    regarding the calculation of weighted average common and common equivalent
    shares outstanding.
IIA 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 14 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United 

States Code, of the rule submitted by the Social Security Administration 

relating to Implementation of the NICS Improvement Amendments Act 

of 2007. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 30, 2017 

Mr. GRASSLEY (for himself, Mr. MCCONNELL, Mr. CRAPO, Mr. LEE, Mr. 

CORNYN, Mr. PAUL, Mr. BARRASSO, Mr. SHELBY, Mr. GRAHAM, Mr. 

LANKFORD, Mrs. ERNST, Mr. BLUNT, Mr. ROBERTS, Mr. BOOZMAN, Mr. 

ENZI, Mr. GARDNER, Mr. ISAKSON, Mr. CASSIDY, and Mr. SASSE) introduced the following joint resolution; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of 

title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by 

the Social Security Administration relating to Implementation of the NICS Improvement Amendments Act of 

2007. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the So4 cial Security Administration relating to Implementation of 

5 the NICS Improvement Amendments Act of 2007 (pubVerDate Sep 11 2014 02:35 Jan 31, 2017 Jkt 069200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\SJ14.IS SJ14

smartinez on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•SJ 14 IS 

1 lished at 81 Fed. Reg. 91702 (December 19, 2016)), and 

2 such rule shall have no force or effect. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-8249

CECIL SIMMONS,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

DIRECTOR OZMINT; CAPTAIN BRIHART; DEBORAH ROWE, Hearing 

Officer; MR. BURTT,

Defendants – Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Greenville. R. Bryan Harwell, District 

Judge. (6:08-cv-00860-RBH)

Submitted: May 20, 2010 Decided: May 25, 2010

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Cecil Simmons, Appellant Pro Se. William Henry Davidson, II, 

Matthew Blaine Rosbrugh, DAVIDSON, MORRISON & LINDEMANN, PA, 

Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Cecil Simmons appeals the district court’s order 

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying 

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have 

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, 

we deny Simmons’s motion for appointment of counsel and affirm 

for the reasons stated by the district court. Simmons v. 

Ozmint, No. 6:08-cv-00860-RBH (D.S.C. Dec. 4, 2009). We dispense 

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before the court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
ITEM 14- EXHIBITS

	Financial Statements and Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K.

ACCOUNTANT'S REPORT
BALANCE SHEET AS OF JUNE 30, 1995 and JUNE 30, 1996
STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY FOR THE PERIOD JULY 1, 1993 TO
 	JUNE 30, 1996
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 1994, 1995,
 	and 1996
STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS FOR THE YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 1994, 1995,
 	and 1996
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SCHEDULES
I			       SUPPLEMENTARY PROFIT AND LOSS INFORMATION
EX-27      FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE-FILED AS ADDITIONAL 			       
           DOCUMENT, TYPE EX-27

                   SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Act
of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its 
behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

                   MODERN TECHNOLOGY CORP.

                   By  Arthur J. Seidenfeld
                       President, Principal Executive Officer
                       and Principal Financial Officer
                       Dated:  December 3, 1996

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1934, this report has 
been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in
the capacities and on the date indicated.
NAME                     TITLE                       DATE

ARTHUR J SEIDENFELD      PRESIDENT AND DIRECTOR      DECEMBER 3, 1996

ANNE SEIDENFELD          TREASURER, SECRETARY        DECEMBER 3, 1996
                         AND DIRECTOR               

GERALD KAUFMAN           DIRECTOR                    DECEMBER 3, 1996
Home | About GAO | Contact GAO | Site Map | E-mail Updates | Help

Advanced SearchSearch Only Legal Decisions

# 

        - Reports & Testimonies
        - Legal Decisions
        - Comptroller General
        - Topic Collections
        - Careers
        - FraudNet/Reporting Fraud
        - Multimedia

# Humane Methods of Slaughter Act:  USDA Inspectors' Views on Enforcement (GAO-10-244SP), February 2010, an E-supplement to GAO-10-203

              - Introduction
              - Background
              - Time Allocation and Responsibilities
              - Making Enforcement Decisions
              - Humane Activities Tracking System (HATS)
              - Stunning at this Establishment
              - Ability to Observe Humane Handling at this Establishment
              - Video Surveillance
              - Impact of Enforcement Decisions on You
              - Final Comments
              - Completed
              - Print and Exit
No. 89-6569.

#### Dillard *v.*Owens, Commissioner of Corrections of Pennsylvania, et al.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
M. P. No. 74-257.

#### Albert D’Angelo *v.*School Committee of the Town of Smithfield.

*Ernest Barone,*for petitioner.

Petition for writ of certiorari is denied.
Case: 1:12-cv-03130 Document #: 177 Filed: 03/16/20 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:4040
Case: 1:12-cv-03130 Document #: 177 Filed: 03/16/20 Page 2 of 5 PageID #:4041
Case: 1:12-cv-03130 Document #: 177 Filed: 03/16/20 Page 3 of 5 PageID #:4042
Case: 1:12-cv-03130 Document #: 177 Filed: 03/16/20 Page 4 of 5 PageID #:4043
Case: 1:12-cv-03130 Document #: 177 Filed: 03/16/20 Page 5 of 5 PageID #:4044
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

# AGENCY:

Office of the Under Secretary (Personnel and Readiness), Department of Defense (DoD).

      ( print page 6879)    

# ACTION:

Notice of housing price inflation adjustment.

# SUMMARY:

The Department of Defense is announcing the 2020 rent threshold under the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act. Applying the inflation adjustment for 2020, the maximum monthly rental amount as of January 1, 2021, will be $4,089.62.

# DATES:

These housing price inflation adjustments are effective January 1, 2021.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Lt. Col. Patrick Schwomeyer, Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness, (703) 692-8170.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The Servicemembers Civil Relief Act, as codified at 50 U.S.C. App. 3951, prohibits a landlord from evicting a Service member (or the Service member's family) from a residence during a period of military service, except by court order. The law as originally passed by Congress applied to dwellings with monthly rents of $2,400 or less. The law requires the Department of Defense to adjust this amount annually to reflect inflation and to publish the new amount in the                     **Federal Register**                    . Applying the inflation adjustment for 2020, the maximum monthly rental amount for 50 U.S.C. App. 3951(a)(1)(A)(ii) as of January 1, 2021, will be $4,089.62.                

Dated: January 19, 2021.

Aaron T. Siegel,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 2021-01481 Filed 1-22-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
# Úradný vestník C 330A/7. o

| | ISSN 1977-1037 |
| --- | --- |
| Úradný vestník
  Európskej únie | C 330A |
| | |
| Slovenské vydanie | Informácie a oznámenia | Zväzok 587. októbra 2015 |

ISSN 1977-1037

Úradný vestník

Európskej únie

C 330A

Slovenské vydanie

Informácie a oznámenia

Zväzok 587. októbra 2015

---

| Číslo oznamu | Obsah | Strana |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Oznamy |
| | ADMINISTRATÍVNE POSTUPY |
| | Európsky úrad pre výber pracovníkov (EPSO) |
| 2015/C 330A/01 | Oznámenie o zrušení | 1 |

Číslo oznamu

Obsah

Strana

V   Oznamy

ADMINISTRATÍVNE POSTUPY

Európsky úrad pre výber pracovníkov (EPSO)

2015/C 330A/01

Oznámenie o zrušení

1

---

| SK | |
| --- | --- |

SK

---

V Oznamy

ADMINISTRATÍVNE POSTUPY

Európsky úrad pre výber pracovníkov (EPSO)

| 7.10.2015 | SK | Úradný vestník Európskej únie | CA 330/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.10.2015

SK

Úradný vestník Európskej únie

CA 330/1

---

OZNÁMENIE O ZRUŠENÍ

(2015/C 330 A/01)

Verejné výberové konanie EPSO/AD/321/15 – Administrátori v oblasti auditu (AD 5/AD 7) publikované v Úradnom vestníku Európskej únie
   (1) je zrušené.

---

(1)  Ú. v. EÚ C 316 A, 24.9.2015, s. 1.

---
STATE OF LOUISIANA

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

KIMBERLY PEARCE ON BEHALF OF

HER MINOR SON, MASON PEARCE, 

AND BIANCA SIMMS ON BEHALF

OF HER MINOR SON, DEMETRICUS

FOUNTAIN, JR. 

NO. 2023 CW 0761

VERSUS

RUBICON, LLC, INDIVIDUALLY

AND ON BEHALF OF CHEM

FRIENDS, AN UNINCORPORATED

ASSOCIATION, ABC INSURANCE

COMPANY, THE ASCENSION

PARISH SCHOOL BOARD, ON

BEHALF OF, CENTRAL MIDDLE

SCHOOL AND GALVEZ MIDDLE

SCHOOL, AND JOHN DOE

OCTOBER 10, 2023

In Re: Rubicon, 

Judicial

124694. 

LLC, applying for supervisory writs, 

District Court, Parish of Ascension, 

BEFORE: McCLENDON, HESTER, AND MILLER, JJ. 

WRIT DENIED. 

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

DEPUTY CLERK OF COURT

FOR THE COURT

PMc

CHH

SMM

23rd

No.