alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.88


                               FIRST AMENDMENT TO
                               PURCHASE AGREEMENT
                                     BETWEEN
                MATSUSHITA KOTOBUKI ELECTRONICS INDUSTRIES, LTD.
                                       AND
                               MAXTOR CORPORATION
                               DATED APRIL 2, 2001


This First Amendment ("Amendment") to Purchase Agreement between Matsushita
Kotobuki Electronics Industries, Ltd. ("MKE") and Maxtor Corporation ("Maxtor")
dated April 2, 2001 ("Purchase Agreement") is entered into by and between MKE
and Maxtor.

WHEREAS, the Purchase Agreement between MKE and Maxtor is due to terminate on
November 2, 2001 unless otherwise renewed by the parties.

WHEREAS, MKE and Maxtor are desirous of continuing their business relationship
contemplated in the Purchase Agreement.

NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows:

1.  The term of the Purchase Agreement shall be extended such that the Purchase
    Agreement will terminate, unless otherwise renewed by the parties, on
    November 2, 2002, and the parties will continue their good faith discussions
    regarding manufacturing activities by MKE for Maxtor under the Purchase
    Agreement through that date.

2.  All the terms of the Purchase Agreement shall continue to apply to the
    transactions between MKE and Maxtor except for those terms which are amended
    by this Amendment.

3.  This Amendment shall be effective as of November 2, 2001 retroactively.


MATSUSHITA KOTOBUKI ELECTRONICS         MAXTOR CORPORATION
INDUSTRIES, LTD.


By: /s/ TAKAO KANAMURA                  By: /s/ PAUL TUFANO
    ----------------------------------      ------------------------------------
    Takao Kanamura                          Paul Tufano

Title: Senior Managing Director         Title: Chief Operating Officer and
                                               Chief Financial Officer

Date: March 8, 2002                     Date: March 15, 2002
      --------------------------------        ----------------------------------
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 23-0417

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

TRINA ROE,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including March 13, 2024, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

February 5 2024

02/05/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0417
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 15 (Tuesday, January 26, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 7111-7112]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-01656]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Committee on Equal Opportunities in Science and Engineering; 
Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation (NSF) announces the 
following meeting:
    Name and Committee Code: Committee on Equal Opportunities in 
Science and Engineering (CEOSE) (#1173).
    Date and Time: February 25, 2021; 1:00 p.m.-5:30 p.m.; February 26, 
2021; 10:00 a.m.-3:30 p.m.
    Place: National Science Foundation, 2415 Eisenhower Avenue, 
Alexandria, VA 22314 (Virtual). Meeting Registration: Virtual 
attendance information will be forthcoming on the CEOSE website at 
http://www.nsf.gov/od/oia/activities/ceose/index.jsp.
    Type of Meeting: Open.
    Contact Person: Dr. Bernice Anderson, Senior Advisor and CEOSE 
Executive Secretary, Office of Integrative Activities (OIA), National 
Science Foundation, 2415 Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, VA 22314. 
Contact Information: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7a4d4a495748434857424a4e4a55181b141e1f0809153a14091c541d150c">703-292-8040/<span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="7614171812130405193618051058111900">[email protected]</span></a>.
    Minutes: Meeting minutes and other information may be obtained from 
the CEOSE Executive Secretary at the above address or the website at 
http://www.nsf.gov/od/oia/activities/ceose/index.jsp.
    Purpose of Meeting: To study data, programs, policies, and other 
information pertinent to the National Science Foundation and to provide 
advice and recommendations concerning broadening participation in 
science and engineering.

[[Page 7112]]

Agenda

Day 1: February 25, 2021

<bullet> Welcome/Opening Remarks
<bullet> Report of the CEOSE Executive Liaison
<bullet> Presentation: Open Science and NSF Broader Impacts
<bullet> Joint Session with NSB
<bullet> CEOSE Liaison Reports
<bullet> Discussion: Recommendation(s) of the 2019-2020 CEOSE Report 
and Planning for the Next Day

Day 2: February 26, 2021

<bullet> Overview of the Day
<bullet> Discussion: Special Sessions with NCSES and EHR Advisory 
Committee in Spring 2021
<bullet> Group Work: Review of the Draft 2019-2020 CEOSE Review
<bullet> Reports of Federal Liaisons
<bullet> Discussion with NSF Director and Chief Operating Officer
<bullet> Announcements and Closing Remarks
<bullet> Adjournment

    Dated: January 21, 2021.
Crystal Robinson,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2021-01656 Filed 1-25-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
WWW
NUMBER                                                                    SHARES

WW 2847
                    WORLD WIDE WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
               INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

                                  COMMON STOCK

                                        SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR CERTAIN DEFINITIONS

THIS CERTIFIES THAT                                            CUSIP 981550 10 9

                              SPECIMEN CERTIFICATE

SPECIMEN CERTIFICATE                                        SPECIMEN CERTIFICATE

to the owner of

  FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE SHARES OF THE COMMON STOCK OF THE PAR VALUE OF
                               $.001 PER SHARE OF

                    WORLD WIDE WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS, INC.

(hereinafter  called  the  "Corporation")  transferable  on  the  books  of  the
Corporation  in person or by duly  authorized  attorney  upon  surrender of this
Certificate  properly  endorsed.  This  Certificate  and the shares  represented
hereby  are  issued  and  shall be held  subject  to all the  provisions  of the
Certificate of  Incorporation  and By-Laws of the Corporation and the amendments
from  time to time made  thereto,  copies of which are or will be on file at the
principal  office of the  Corporation,  to all of which the holder by acceptance
hereof  assents.  This  Certificate  is not valid  unless  countersigned  by the
Transfer Agent and registered by the Registrar.

         WITNESS  the  facsimile  seal  of the  Corporation  and  the  facsimile
signatures of its duly authorized officers.

Dated:

??????????????????????                                      ????????????????????
    SECRETARY                                                    PRESIDENT

                                     [SEAL]

Countersigned and Registered:
                        MANHATTAN TRANSFER REGISTRAR CO.
                                 (HOLBROOK, N.Y)
                                                                  Transfer Agent
                                                                   and Registrar
By

                                                            Authorized Signature
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Calvin Johnson, Appellant.

Motion to dispense with printing granted. The appeal will be heard on the original papers (including the typed minutes) and on a typewritten brief. The appellant is directed to file six copies of his typewritten brief and to serve one copy on the District Attorney. The appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged to the February 1961 Term. The appeal is ordered on the calendar for said term. Motion for assignment of counsel granted. Jacob Siegfried, Esquire, 66 Court Street, Brooklyn 1, New York, is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Christ, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur.
1309.503-70 Waiver. ( a ) The need for a waiver of an organizational conflict of interest (OCI) may be identified by the contracting officer or by a written request submitted by an offeror or contractor. The contracting officer shall review all of the relevant facts and shall refer the matter to the Senior Bureau Procurement Official, who shall make a written recommendation to the Head of Contracting Activity whether a waiver should be granted to allow for a contract award or for continuation of an existing contract.
( b ) Criteria for Waiver of OCIs. Issuance of a waiver shall be limited to those situations in which: ( 1 ) The work to be performed under contract is vital to the agency;
( 2 ) There is no party other than the conflicted party that can perform the contract at issue; and
( 3 ) Contractual and/or technical review and supervision methods cannot be employed to mitigate the conflict.
Exhibit 32.0

# Written Statement of
the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer  Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350

Solely for the purposes of complying
with 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, we, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Cal-Maine
Foods Inc. (the Company), hereby certify, based on their knowledge, that the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended August 27, 2005 (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.

/s/ Fred R. Adams, Jr. Fred R.
Adams, Jr.Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer

/s/ Timothy A. Dawson Timothy A.
Dawson Vice President, Chief Financial Officer

Date:  October 4, 2005
1809.505-4 Obtaining access to sensitive information. ( b ) In accordance with FAR 9.503, the Assistant Administrator for Procurement has determined that it would not be in the Government's interests for NASA to comply strictly with FAR 9.505-4(b) when acquiring services to support management activities and administrative functions. The Assistant Administrator for Procurement has, therefore, waived the requirement that before gaining access to other companies' proprietary or sensitive (see 1837.203-70) information contractors must enter specific agreements with each of those other companies to protect their information from unauthorized use or disclosure. Accordingly, NASA will not require contractors and subcontractors and their employees in procurements that support management activities and administrative functions to enter into separate, interrelated third party agreements to protect sensitive information from unauthorized use or disclosure. As an alternative to numerous, separate third party agreements, 1837.203-70 prescribes detailed policy and procedures to protect contractors from unauthorized use or disclosure of their sensitive information. Nothing in this section waives the requirements of FAR 37.204 and 1837.204.
[70 FR 35554, June 21, 2005]
#### Jones *et al. v.*Cole.

Atkinson, J.

1. An assignment of error in excluding evidence must, *to*entitle it to consideration,’ on its face disclose, either literally or in substance, what that evidence was. *Russell*v. *Mohr-Weil Lumber Co.,*115 Ga. *35 (41 S. E. 275).*Accordingly, assignments of error on rulings of the court excluding evidence, made during the trial of an illegality case, were insufficient, which recited: *(a)*that the excepting party offered evidence to show that he was “not liable for the” amount specified “in the fi. fa.,” but did not set forth the exact evidence relied on to produce that result or its substance; (b) that the excepting party offered in evidence “the .judgment upon which the fi. fa. was issued,” *597for tlie purpose- of showing “that the fi fa. was not based upon a legal judgment,” but did not set forth a copy of the judgment or its substance.

March 11, 1913.

Affidavit of illegality. Before Judge Edwards. Paulding superior court. February 14, 1912.

*C. D. McGregor*and *J. II. McLarty,*for plaintiffs in error.

2. No evidence being introduced to support the grounds of the affidavit of illegality, it was not erroneous for the judge to dismiss the same at the costs of the defendants in ft. fa.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Seek, J., absent. The other Justices concur.*
**U.S. Department of Education  Office for Civil RightsFiscal Year 1998Annual Report to Congress*Guaranteeing Equal Access to High-Standards Education*
**Mission:**
*To ensure equal access to education for all students through the vigorous enforcement of civil rights.*
**Those We Serve:**
*We serve students facing discrimination.*Table of Contents- Message from the Assistant Secretary  Guaranteeing Equal Access to High-Standards EducationResponsibilities of the Office for Civil Rights
- How the OCR Does its Work  How the OCR Measures its WorkA Right-Sized OCR
- The OCR'S National Impact  How the OCR Serves Students and Their SchoolsInto the Next Century
- Appendices    - OCR Publications  OCR OfficesFor the user's convenience, this publication is also available in portable document format (pdf) [355K]. To read pdf files you will need Adobe's Acrobat Reader; if you do not have Acrobat you can download a free copy from Adobe. 

Top
  Last Modified: 01/16/2020

**
400 MARYLAND AVE. S.W., WASHINGTON, DC 20202-2600

www.ed.gov

The Department of Education’s mission is to promote student achievement and preparation for global competitiveness

by fostering educational excellence and ensuring equal access.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES 

September 18, 2020

SENT VIA EMAIL – CONFIRMATION OF RECEIPT REQUESTED 

Honorable Tony Thurmond 

State Superintendent of Public Instruction 

California Department of Education 

1430 N Street 

Sacramento, California 95814 

tthurmond@cde.ca.gov 

Dear State Superintendent Thurmond: 

This letter grants final approval under Section 421(b) of the General Education Provisions Act for 

grant awards H027A180116 and H173A180120. 

The Department received your August 19, 2020 request on behalf of the California Department of 

Education for a waiver extending the period of availability for Federal fiscal year (FFY) 2018 

Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) Part B grant award funds. 

With this approval, the FFY 2018 IDEA Part B grant award funds will be available for obligation 

through September 30, 2021 and may be liquidated through December 30, 2021. 

Please contact your Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP) State Lead, Susan Murray, at 

Susan.Murray@ed.gov if you have any questions. 

Sincerely,

/s/

Mark Schultz 

Commissioner, Rehabilitation Services Administration. 

Delegated the authority to perform the functions and 

duties of the Assistant Secretary for the Office of Special 

Education and Rehabilitative Services. 

cc: State Director
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Julius Gaines, Appellant.

[834 NYS2d 417]—

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Frank E Geraci, Jr., J.), entered October 13, 2005. The order determined that defendant is a level three risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from an order determining that he is a level three risk under the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law § 168 *et seq.).*The total risk factor score on the risk assessment instrument resulted in the presumptive classification of defendant as a level two risk and, in determining that an upward departure to a level three risk was warranted, Supreme Court took into account defendant’s persistent history of violent activities and concluded that defendant presented a great danger to the community. On appeal, defendant contends that the People failed to establish the basis for the assessment of 20 points under risk factor seven, i.e., “[Relationship with victim.” We reject that contention. The People presented evidence establishing that the victim met defendant for the first time on the day of the incident, did not know his legal

*1213name, and apparently knew no other personal information about him. Thus, the court properly concluded that “defendant was a stranger to the victim” *(People v McGraw,*24 AD3d 525, 526 [2005]; *see generally*Sex Offender Registration Act: Risk Assessment Guidelines and Commentary, at 12 [Nov. 1997]). Present—Hurlbutt, J.P., Martoche, Smith, Centra and Peradotto, JJ.
Case: 1:12-cv-02715 Document #: 1 Filed: 04/13/12 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:1
Case: 1:12-cv-02715 Document #: 1 Filed: 04/13/12 Page 2 of 10 PageID #:2
Case: 1:12-cv-02715 Document #: 1 Filed: 04/13/12 Page 3 of 10 PageID #:3
Case: 1:12-cv-02715 Document #: 1 Filed: 04/13/12 Page 4 of 10 PageID #:4
Case: 1:12-cv-02715 Document #: 1 Filed: 04/13/12 Page 5 of 10 PageID #:5
Case: 1:12-cv-02715 Document #: 1 Filed: 04/13/12 Page 6 of 10 PageID #:6
Case: 1:12-cv-02715 Document #: 1 Filed: 04/13/12 Page 7 of 10 PageID #:7
Case: 1:12-cv-02715 Document #: 1 Filed: 04/13/12 Page 8 of 10 PageID #:8
Case: 1:12-cv-02715 Document #: 1 Filed: 04/13/12 Page 9 of 10 PageID #:9
Case: 1:12-cv-02715 Document #: 1 Filed: 04/13/12 Page 10 of 10 PageID #:10
16.603-4 Contract clauses. ( a ) The contracting officer shall include in each letter contract the clauses required by this regulation for the type of definitive contract contemplated and any additional clauses known to be appropriate for it.
( b ) In addition, the contracting officer shall insert the following clauses in solicitations and contracts when a letter contract is contemplated: ( 1 ) The clause at 52.216-23, Execution and Commencement of Work, except that this clause may be omitted from letter contracts awarded on SF 26;
( 2 ) The clause at 52.216-24, Limitation of Government Liability, with dollar amounts completed in a manner consistent with 16.603-2(d); and
( 3 ) The clause at 52.216-25, Contract Definitization, with its paragraph (b) completed in a manner consistent with 16.603-2(c). If at the time of entering into the letter contract, the contracting officer knows that the definitive contract will be based on adequate price competition or will otherwise meet the criteria of 15.403-1 for not requiring submission of certified cost or pricing data, the words “and certified cost or pricing data in accordance with FAR 15.408, Table 15-2 supporting its proposal” may be deleted from paragraph (a) of the clause. If the letter contract is being awarded on the basis of price competition, the contracting officer shall use the clause with its *Alternate I.*
( c ) The contracting officer shall also insert the clause at 52.216-26, Payments of Allowable Costs Before Definitization, in solicitations and contracts if a cost-reimbursement definitive contract is contemplated, unless the acquisition involves conversion, alteration, or repair of ships.
[48 FR 42219, Sept. 19, 1983, as amended at 60 FR 48217, Sept. 18, 1995; 62 FR 51270, Sept. 30, 1997; 75 FR 53149, Aug. 30, 2010]
#### 1306.303 Justifications.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice: 11327]

Acting under the authority of and in accordance with sections 1(a)(ii)(A) of Executive Order 13224 of September 23, 2001, as amended by Executive Order 13268 of July 2, 2002, Executive Order 13284 of January 23, 2003, and Executive Order 13886 of September 9, 2019, I hereby determine that the person known as Abd al-Aziz Malluh Mirjirash al-Muhammadawi, also known as Abdul Aziz Al-Mohammedawi, also known as Abdulazeez Mlawwah Mjeresh Mjeresh, also known as Abu Fadak Al-Mohammedawi, also known as Abu Fadak, also known as Al Khal, is a foreign person who poses a significant risk of committing an act of terrorism that threaten the security of U.S. nationals or the national security, foreign policy, or economy of the United States.

Consistent with the determination in section 10 of Executive Order 13224 that prior notice to persons determined to be subject to the Order who might have a constitutional presence in the United States would render ineffectual the blocking and other measures authorized in the Order because of the ability to transfer funds instantaneously, I determine that no prior notice needs to be provided to any person subject to this determination who might have a constitutional presence in the United States, because to do so would render ineffectual the measures authorized in the Order.

                    This notice shall be published in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                

Dated: September 3, 2020.

Michael R. Pompeo,

Secretary of State.

[FR Doc. 2021-01003 Filed 1-15-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-AD-P
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Harvey Shaw, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant Shaw from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered March 14, 1963 after a jury trial, convicting him of conspiracy, as a felony (Penal Law, § 580-a) and of carrying a dangerous weapon, as a misdemeanor (Penal Law, § 1897) and imposing sentence. This defendant was indicted and tried jointly with one Thomas Montgomery. Judgment affirmed. (See *People*v. *Montgomery,*21 A D 2d 904.) Beldoek, P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Brennan and Hill, JJ., concur.
#### 208.7001 Definitions.

For purposes of this subpart—

*Acquiring department* means the department, agency, or General Services Administration which has contracting responsibility under the Coordinated Acquisition Program.

*Integrated materiel management* means assignment of acquisition management responsibility to one department, agency, or the General Services Administration for all of DoD's requirements for the assigned item. Acquisition management normally includes computing requirements, funding, budgeting, storing, issuing, cataloging, standardizing, and contracting functions.

*Requiring department* means the department or agency which has the requirement for an item.