alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Addition of section/statement and conforming change:**

§ 668.417:  Statement of Mission

An institution must include in its mission statement, as to GE programs, that the institution’s mission includes “preparing students for gainful employment in recognized occupations” or word substantially to that effect.

Change to §668.403(a)(1):

“Satisifies the applicable application, mission, and certification requirements in §§ 668.415; ~~and~~668.416; and 668.417; and
#### Hanes *et al. v.*Davis *et al.*

April 16, 1913.

Injunction. Before Judge Jones. Hall superior court. June 15, 1912.

*William M. Johnson,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Howard Thompson*and *B. P. Oaillard Jr.,*contra.

Fish, C. J.

1. According to the ruling made in *Coleman*v. *Board of Education,*131 *Ga.*644 (5), 648 (63 S. E. 41), a court of equity had jurisdiction to grant the relief sought in the present case.

2. The evidence being conflicting, the judge did not abuse his discretion m granting an interlocutory injunction.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000715273
<NAME> BAY MEADOWS OPERATING COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                           9,342
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      994
<ALLOWANCES>                                        82
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                13,726
<PP&E>                                           9,458
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,520
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  17,925
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           17,165
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            58
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                         659
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    17,925
<SALES>                                          1,749
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                29,883
<CGS>                                              580
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   39,897
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  51
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (65)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        30
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (35)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (35)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.01)
        

</TABLE>
From: Jessica Morales, Negotiator for Students and Borrowers

To: 2024 Negotiated Rulemaking 

Program Integrity and Institutional Quality Committee 

Date: January 9, 2024

Re: State Authorizer Risk-Based Reviews

As members of the program integrity triad, state authorizers are expected to oversee institutions to 

ensure they comply with state laws, protecting consumers of higher education. However, for the three 

elements of the program integrity triad -- states, accreditors, and the U.S. Department of Education -- to 

be able to work in concert effectively, states must be aware of, and responsive to, the actions of other 

regulators. 

Already, accrediting agencies are required to consider decisions from states and other accrediting 

agencies in its accreditation decisions, and to assess probation or adverse actions by other accrediting 

agencies to determine whether the basis for those actions suggests the institution is out of compliance 

with the agency’s standards (34 CFR 602.28(b) and (d)). Yet no similar provision exists for state 

authorizers to consider actions by other regulators.

Additionally, these types of reviews focused on institutions with known regulatory problems provide 

states the opportunity to better target their ongoing oversight and monitoring of institutions to the 

highest-risk institutions, ensuring they are more effective in protecting students and taxpayers. By 

focusing their monitoring efforts on high-risk institutions, states can also address the challenges many 

face due to limited capacity and staff resources. 

The below language reflects the current regulations, with proposed changes in red text. The Department 

did not propose any changes to this section of the rules.

600.9 State authorization.

 

(a) 

(1) An institution described under §§ 600.4, 600.5, and 600.6 is legally authorized by a State if the State 

has a process to review and appropriately act on complaints concerning the institution, including 

enforcing applicable State laws; to review and appropriately act on actions concerning the institution by 

another regulator; and the institution meets the provisions of paragraphs (a)(1)(i), (a)(1)(ii), or (b) of this 

section.

* * *
2 

(3) The State process to review and appropriately act on regulator actions must ensure that, if the State 

learns that an institution it approves is the subject of a review, lawsuit, negative action, or adverse 

action by a State or Federal agency or a recognized institutional accrediting agency, the State 

immediately initiates review of its approval to determine if the institution is out of compliance with 

State standards and if any action should be taken.
U.S. Dept Commerce/NOAA/NMFS/NWFSC/PublicationsAppendix Figure 7. General topography of the area at RKm 139.8 (Austin Point), Columbia River, selected for observation during the juvenile salmonid stranding survey, 1992 and 1993.
Exhibit
32





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18
U.S.C.


SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002





This
certification set forth below is hereby made solely for the purposes of
satisfying the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 and may not be relied upon or used for any other purposes.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Access Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and will be retained by Access Pharmaceuticals,
Inc. and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon its request.





Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Public Company Accounting Reform and Investor Act of 2002
(18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted, the “Sarbanes-Oxley Act”), Jeffrey B. Davis, Chief
Executive Officer of Access Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the "Company"), and Stephen
B. Thompson, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each
hereby certifies that to his knowledge the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the
period ended December 31, 2007 of the Company filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report") fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for
the period specified.





Signed at
the City of  Dallas, in the State of Texas, this 31st day of March,
2008.








/s/ Jeffrey B.
Davis                                                          /s/ Stephen B.
Thompson


Jeffrey
B.
Davis                                                                                                           Stephen
B. Thompson


Chief
Executive
Officer                                                                                              Chief Financial
Officer
Exhibit
      32(b)







**CERTIFICATION
      FURNISHED PURSUANT TO**




**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**




**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**




**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Progress Energy, Inc.
      (the
“Company”) for the period ending September 30, 2006 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Peter
      M. Scott III, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
      Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)  the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
      applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)  the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.











/s/
      Peter M. Scott III


Peter
      M.
      Scott III


Executive
      Vice President and


Chief
      Financial Officer


November
      3, 2006








This
      certification is being furnished and shall not be deemed filed by the Company
      for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
      or incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Exchange Act
      of
      1934, as amended, or the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
Docket No: FAA-2014-1044 Dir ID: 2014-NM-148-AD
U.S. Department of 

Transportation 

Office of the Secretary 

of Transportation 

TheHonorable LaurieR. Gill 

Mayor of the City of Pierre 

222 E. Dakota Ave. 

P.O. Box 1253 

Pierre, SD 57501 

Dear Mayor Gill: 

MAR 24 2015 

1200 New Jersey Avenue SE 

Washington DC 20590 

0 

N 

/ 

. ' 

Thank you for your letter requesting an additional time extension regarding Pierre's Essential Air 

Service (EAS) recommendation due to the recent developments of Aerodynamics Incorporated 

(ADI), which you had previously recommended for selection to provide EAS to Pierre. 

You state the City of Pierre supports the US DOT's (the Department's) Air Carrier Fitness 

Division's review process and the City will await the Department's final determination before 

making a rec01i1mendation. Further, the City requests two weeks after ADI's fitness 

determination has been finalized to make their recommendation. 

The Department hereby grants the City of Pierre's request. 

A copy of this letter will be placed in Pierre's docket (DOT-OST-2011-0138) on 

\VW\v.re!!tllations.!!ov. 

Sincerely, 

.~-\-A 3).~;J Brandon i'vl. Belford 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for 

Aviation and International Affairs
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 11 (Tuesday, January 19, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5141-5142]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-01102]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

[RTID 0648-XA813]


Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council (MAFMC); Public Meeting

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice; public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Research Steering Committee (RSC) of the Mid-Atlantic 
Fishery Management Council (Council) will hold a meeting.

DATES: The meeting will be held on Thursday, March 18, 2021, beginning 
at 9 a.m. and conclude by 12 noon. For agenda details, see 
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held via webinar. Details on the 
proposed agenda, webinar listen-in access, and briefing materials will 
be posted at the MAFMC's website: www.mafmc.org.
    Council address: Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council, 800 N 
State Street, Suite 201, Dover, DE 19901; telephone: (302) 674-2331; 
www.mafmc.org.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christopher M. Moore, Ph.D., Executive 
Director, Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council, telephone: (302) 
526-5255.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The purpose of this RSC meeting is to 
discuss re-development of the research set-aside program. In doing so, 
the RSC will also discuss the outcomes of the April 2020 meeting, the 
Scientific and Statistical Committee Economic Working Group 
involvement, and detail workshop logistics.

Special Accommodations

    The meeting is physically accessible to people with disabilities. 
Requests for

[[Page 5142]]

sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aids should be directed 
to Kathy Collins at the Mid-Atlantic Council Office, (302) 526-5253, at 
least 5 days prior to the meeting date.

(Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.)

    Dated: January 13, 2021.
Rey Israel Marquez,
Acting Deputy Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National 
Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2021-01102 Filed 1-15-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P
AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO THE NASA RESEARCH ANNOUNCEMENT (NRA) ENTITLED

"RESEARCH OPPORTUNITIES IN SPACE AND EARTH SCIENCES (ROSES) 2010," 

NNH10ZDA001N, RELEASED FEBRUARY 12, 2010 

New proposal opportunity in Appendix C.25 the Venus Climate Orbiter Participating 

Scientist Program (VCO PSP). 

This amendment establishes a new program element in Appendix C.25 entitled "Venus 

Climate Orbiter Participating Scientist Program (VCO PSP)." The objectives of the VCO 

PSP are to enhance, aid in data archival, and supplement Venus science to be performed 

by the Venus Climate Orbiter (VCO, or AKATSUKI). The VCO PSP investigations aim 

to understand the atmospheric circulation using global atmospheric mapping by utilizing 

VCO’s five cameras (from UV to IR wavelengths), and by measuring the vertical 

structure of the atmosphere with radio occultation techniques. VCO’s systematic and 

continuous observations should provide a complete dataset of the Venusian atmospheric 

dynamics that complements the Venus Express observations and prior Venus missions. 

Up to two Participating Scientists in residence will be selected to reside in Japan (ISAS) 

and work with the VCO Science Team to reduce and archive data. 

Notices of Intent are due June 11, 2010 and proposals are due August 6, 2010 and Tables 

2 and 3 of the Summary of Solicitation for this NRA have been updated to reflect the 

creation of this program. 

Questions concerning this program may be addressed to Adriana Ocampo, Planetary 

Science Division, Science Mission Directorate, NASA Headquarters, Washington, DC 

20546-0001; Telephone: (202) 358-2152; Email: aco@nasa.gov.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Statements re computation of per share earnings                         Exhibit 11
(In Thousands Except for Per Share Data)

                                                        Year ended December 31
                                                  ---------------------------------
                                                     2000        1999        1998
                                                  ---------   ---------   ---------
<S>                                               <C>         <C>         <C>
BASIC NET INCOME PER SHARE
Weighted average common stock outstanding.......    11,000      10,934      10,837
                                                  =========   =========   =========
Net income......................................    $4,651     $22,375     $20,213
                                                  =========   =========   =========
Basic net income per share......................     $0.42       $2.05       $1.86
                                                  =========   =========   =========

DILUTED NET INCOME PER SHARE
Weighted average common stock outstanding.......    11,000      10,934      10,837

Common equivalent shares for stock options using
    the treasury stock method...................       134         158         223
                                                  ---------   ---------   ---------
Weighted average shares outstanding.............    11,134      11,092      11,060
                                                  =========   =========   =========
Net income......................................    $4,651     $22,375     $20,213
                                                  =========   =========   =========
Diluted net income per share....................     $0.42       $2.02       $1.83
                                                  =========   =========   =========

</TABLE>

All share and per share information has been adjusted for the 3% stock
dividend declared in November 2000.
Case: 1:12-cv-01853 Document #: 15 Filed: 06/14/12 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:51
Case: 1:12-cv-01853 Document #: 15 Filed: 06/14/12 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:52
#### 19.804 Evaluation, offering, and acceptance.
#### 22.1400 Scope of subpart.

This subpart prescribes policies and procedures for implementing section 503 of the Rehabilitation Act of l973, as amended (29 U.S.C. 793) (the Act); Executive Order 11758, January 15, 1974; and the regulations of the Secretary of Labor (41 CFR part 60-741). In this subpart, the terms *contract* and *contractor* include *subcontract* and *subcontractor.*

[48 FR 42258, Sept. 19, 1983, as amended at 79 FR 43578, July 25, 2014]
I8/-/5T

ELECTRONIC RECORD \%2ml&

COA# 02-13-00573-CR OFFENSE: OTHER CRIMINAL

Broderick Lamond Gamble v. The

STYLE: state of Texas COUNTY: Tarrant

COA DISPOSITION: AFFIRMED TRIAL COURT: County Criminal Court No. 5

DATE: 01/15/15 Publish: NO TC CASE #: 1289513

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

Broderick Lamond Gamble

STYLE: State of Texas

appellant'1^

v. The

Petition

CCA #:

CCA Disposition:

DATE:

itwr

FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CCA IS:

Rffi/j32> JUDGE:

DATE: 0 ileitis'

JUDGE: 7m UvUAtr^

SIGNED:

PUBLISH:

PC:

DNP:

MOTION FOR

REHEARING IN CCA IS:

JUDGE:

ELECTRONIC RECORD
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. John Doyle, Appellant.

In a *coram nobis*proceeding, defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated January 16, 1964, which denied without a hearing his application to vacate a judgment of conviction of said court rendered May 10, 1963 on his plea of guilty, convicting him of attempted assault in the second degree and imposing sentence. Defendant contends that his plea of guilty was induced by a promise, made to him by his assigned counsel, that he would receive a suspended sentence. Order affirmed. No opinion. Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Brennan, JJ., concur.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Kenneth James, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from an order of the County Court, Kings County, dated February 23,1960, denying after a hearing his *coram nobis*application to vacate a judgment of said court, rendered May 18, 1948, convicting him, after trial, of robbery in the first degree, and sentencing him to serve a term of 10 to 20 years. Order affirmed. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Pette, JJ., concur.
Order entered March 25, 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**
No. 05
- 13
- 00378
- CV
IN RE: TODD PRUETT On Appeal from the 193rd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC
- 12
- 07463 

### O RDER
The Court GR ANTS appellant’s February 28, 2013 motion for an extension of time to file a notice of appeal. The notice of appeal filed on March 19, 2013 is deemed timely filed for jurisdictional purposes.

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

EASTERN DIVISION 

Todd L. Bowers, Inc., 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

RBS Citizens, N.A. and Citizens 

Bank of Pennsylvania, 

Defendants. 

Civil Action No. 12-cv-03436 

Judge Milton I. Shadur

 

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

 Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), plaintiff Todd L. Bowers, Inc. and defendants 

RBS Citizens, N.A. and Citizens Bank of Pennsylvania hereby stipulate to the dismissal of, and 

Todd L. Bowers, Inc. hereby does dismiss, this action in its entirety, with prejudice. Each party 

shall bear its own fees and costs. 

DATED: December 10, 2012 Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ David C. Thollander____________ /s/ David F. Adler__________________ 

David C. Thollander David F. Adler (Ohio No. 0037622) 

The Thollander Law Firm, Ltd. Chad A. Readler (Ohio No. 0068394) 

1048 Ogden Avenue, Suite 200 (dfadler@jonesday.com) 

Downers Grove, Illinois 60515 (careadler@jonesday.com) 

Phone: (630) 971-9195 JONES DAY 

Facsimile: (630) 971-9240 901 Lakeside Avenue 

David Thollander@ThollanderLaw.com Cleveland, OH 44114 

A.R.D.C. 6202012 Tel: (216) 586-3939 

 Fax: (216) 579-0212 

Case: 1:12-cv-03436 Document #: 73 Filed: 12/10/12 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:534
 2 

Thomas G. Shapiro (admitted pro hac vice) Erin L. Shencopp (Illinois No. 6297614) 

Shapiro Haber & Urmy LLP (eshencopp@jonesday.com) 

53 State Street JONES DAY 

Boston, MA 02109 77 West Wacker Drive, Suite 3500 

Telephone: (617) 439-3939 Chicago, IL 60601 

Facsimile: (617) 439-0134 Tel: (312) 782-3939 

tshapiro@shulaw.com Fax: (312) 782-8585 

Counsel for Plaintiff Counsel for RBS Citizens, N.A. and Citizens 

 Bank of Pennsylvania 

Case: 1:12-cv-03436 Document #: 73 Filed: 12/10/12 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:535
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

 I hereby certify that on December 10, 2012, I electronically filed the Stipulation of 

Dismissal With Prejudice with the Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF System, which will send 

notification of such filing to all attorneys of record. 

 /s/ Erin L. Shencopp 

 An attorney for Defendants RBS Citizens, 

 N.A. and Citizens Bank of Pennsylvania 

Case: 1:12-cv-03436 Document #: 73 Filed: 12/10/12 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:536