alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 99.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Allan L. Bridgford, Chairman of Bridgford Foods Corporation (the Company),
certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, that:



|(1) |  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period
August 2,
2002 (the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 780(d)); and
|--- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(2) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.                                                                                       

Dated: September 13, 2002



| | /s/ Allan L. Bridgford
Allan L. Bridgford, Chairman
(Principal Executive Officer)
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Exhibit 10.8


Named Executive Officer Salary and Bonus Arrangements for 2006


          Base Salaries


          The base salaries for 2006 for the executive officers (the "named executive officers") of Great Southern
Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company") and Great Southern Bank (the "Bank") who will be named in the compensation table
that will appear in the Company's upcoming 2006 annual meeting proxy statement are as follows:


	Name and Title
	Base Salary

	 
	William V. Turner	$200,000(1)
	Chairman of the Board of
	 the Company and the Bank
	 
	Joseph W. Turner	$220,000 
	President and Chief
	 Executive Officer of the 
	 Company and the Bank
	 
	Rex A. Copeland	$164,800
	Treasurer of the Company 
	 and Senior Vice President and
	 Chief Financial Officer of the Bank
	 
	Steven G. Mitchem 	$164,800
	Senior Vice President and Chief
	Lending Officer of the Bank
	 	
	Douglas W. Marrs	$ 98,262
	Vice President -- Operations of the Bank



______________


(1) During 2006, William V. Turner will also receive payments of salary previously deferred totaling approximately
$25,000.


          Description of Bonus Arrangements


          For 2006, William V. Turner
waived his right (as he did in 2005) to receive the annual cash bonus provided for in his employment agreement (one-half of one percent of the Company's pre-tax net income).  For 2006, the annual cash bonus payable to Joseph W.
Turner under his employment agreement will be three-fourths of one percent of the Company's pre-tax net income.  For 2006, as for 2005, each of Messrs.
Copeland, Mitchem and Marrs, along with the other executive officers of the Company and the Bank, will be eligible
for a cash bonus of up to 15% of base annual salary, with one half of this possible bonus payable if the Company
achieves targeted growth in earnings per share for 2006 and one-half of the possible bonus awarded based on individual
performance in 2006.
U. S. Department of Education

Negotiated Rulemaking

Violence Against Women Act

January 13, 2014

*

        - Goal of the Negotiated Rulemaking
        - Clery Act versus Title IX
        - What is Title IX?
        - Title IX and Sexual Violence

*

        - The goal of this rulemaking is to develop regulations implementing the new requirements of the Clery Act that were added by the Violence Against Women Reauthorization Act of 2013 (VAWA).
        - The Title IX regulations will not be changed through this process.
        - VAWA amends only the Clery Act, which is a separate statute. The requirements of Title IX, including those set forth in the April 4, 2011 Dear Colleague letter on sexual violence, remain unchanged, and schools must comply with them as before.

*

        - Schools’ obligations under the Clery Act are centered around collecting and reporting information with respect to campus crime statistics and campus security policies.
        - Schools’ obligations under Title IX are centered around ensuring that students are not discriminated against on the basis of sex in the school’s education programs and activities.

Sexual harassment, including sexual violence is a form of sex discrimination.

*

        - Title IX prohibits sex-based discrimination in educational programs and activities receiving federal financial assistance.
        - Title IX applies to all public and private educational institutions receiving federal financial assistance.

*

        - Once a school knows or reasonably should know of possible student-on-student sexual violence, it must:

take immediate and appropriate action to investigate or otherwise determine what occurred.
        - If an investigation reveals that sexual violence that created a hostile environment occurred, a school must take prompt and effective steps reasonably calculated to end the sexual violence, eliminate any hostile environment, and prevent its recurrence.

*

        - The process a school uses for resolving complaints of sexual violence must provide for a prompt and equitable resolution.
        - The specific steps may vary, but in all cases a school’s Title IX investigation must be adequate, reliable, and impartial.
        - A school’s Title IX investigation is different from a law-enforcement investigation.

*

        - Must use the preponderance-of-the-evidence standard of proof.

Parties must have an equal opportunity to present relevant witnesses and other evidence.

If a school permits one party to have a lawyer, it must do so equally for both parties.

If a school provides an appeal process, it must do so for both parties.

Both parties must be notified, in writing, about the outcome of the complaint and any appeal.

*

        - If sexual violence that creates a hostile environment did occur, the school must take reasonable, timely, and age-appropriate corrective action tailored to the specific situation.

End the sexual violence;

Eliminate the hostile environment; and

Prevent recurrence
        - In addition to taking action against the perpetrator, effective corrective action may require remedies for the complainant and broader student population.

*
#### Don J. Wickham, as Commissioner of Agriculture and Markets of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Champlain Creameries, Inc., Appellant.

Judgment affirmed, without costs, on the opinion of Mr. Justice Bookstein at Trial Term (41 Misc 2d 552), with the necessary modifications as to dates of performance. Settle order. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds, Taylor and Hamm, JJ., concur.
Federal Trade

Commission

Protecting America's

Consumers

Many of today's fashion garments feature decorative trim such as beads, sequins, and glitter. However, these kinds of decorative trim do not always hold up under the care procedures suggested

on the care label. In fact, in recent years, the Federal Trade Commission has brought law enforcement actions against nine manufacturers and importers of women's clothing for allegedly

violating the Commission's Care Labeling Rule by placing improper care labels on such garments. The companies paid $352,000 in total penalties. Some of the problems affecting garments

involved in these cases included the following:

Beads damaged in drycleaning solvent, sometimes also resulting in stains on adjacent areas of the garment;

Loss of coloring on beads, sequins, or glitter;

Removal of trim due to softening of adhesive.

The FTC's Care Labeling Rule requires manufacturers and importers to attach care labels to textile clothing. The manufacturer or importer must have a reasonable basis for all the recommended

care instructions. The label must:

Recommend one safe cleaning method -- either washing or drycleaning (unless the garment cannot be safely washed or drycleaned, in which case the label must warn "Do not wash -

Do not dryclean");

Warn against any part of the recommended procedure that may harm the garment or other items cleaned with it;

Warn if the recommended procedure must be modified.

For example, decorative trim such as beads, sequins, and glitter can be harmed in drycleaning, and the usual dry cleaning process (which is defined in the Rule) may have to be modified for

garments containing beads, sequins, or glitter. So, labels for such items sometimes warn that a dry cleaner should use a short cycle, low moisture, low heat, or no steam finishing. In addition, if

one or more of the drycleaning solvents used by drycleaners would harm the product, a solvent that is safe to use must be specified on the label. For example, because the solvent

perchlorethylene can damage polystyrene beads, "dryclean" labels on garments with polystyrene beads may need to specify a solvent that can be used safely on the garments. (If all

commercially available types of solvent can be used safely, the label need not mention any type of solvent.)

If your company manufactures or imports garments with decorative trim similar to that described above, we suggest that you carefully review your care instructions and ensure that you have

reliable evidence to support them. The following documents are available on our website: (1) the Care Labeling Rule; and (2) a table listing cases under the Care Labeling Rule.

For more information about proper labeling of textile, wool, and fur products, see the Commission’s business guide, Threading Your Way Through the Labeling Requirements Under the Textile

and Wool Acts, also available on this website.

Textile Industry Alert!

Fancy Trim May Require Fancy Care

March 2001

Fancy Trim May Require Fancy Care https://web.archive.org/web/20070514065741/http://www.ftc.gov/os/stat...

1 of 1 2/6/2018, 11:52 AM
#### 22.1000 Scope of subpart.

This subpart prescribes policies and procedures implementing the provisions of 41 U.S.C. chapter 67, Service Contract Labor Standards (formerly known as the Service Contract Act of 1965), the applicable provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, as amended (29 U.S.C. 201, et seq.), and related Secretary of Labor regulations and instructions (29 CFR parts 4, 6, 8, and 1925).

[79 FR 24205, Apr. 29, 2014]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6,1

Eastern Division

Libertarian Party of Illinois, et al.

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:12−cv−02511

Honorable Andrea R. Wood

Illinois State Board of Elections, et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Friday, February 12, 2016:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Andrea R. Wood: For the reasons stated in

the Memorandum Opinion and Order to follow, Plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment

[40] is granted and Defendants' motion for summary judgment [44] is denied. Mailed

notice(ef, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:12-cv-02511 Document #: 95 Filed: 02/12/16 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:556
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION

18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection
with the Quarterly Report of Chase General Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the
undersigned, Barry M. Yantis, President and Chief Executive Officer of Chase General Corporation, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my
knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/S/    BARRY M. YANTIS               
|Barry M. Yantis                      
|President and Chief Executive Officer



Dated: November 9, 2004



16
#### 219.270 Religious-related services—inclusion of nonprofit organizations.
#### 1417.402 Limitations.

Use of leader company contracting for a product, subject to the limitations in FAR 17.402, shall require advance discussion with the Director, PAM, prior to approval by the HCA. This authority may not be redelegated. Documentation shall include the circumstances requiring such action.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Final ProgrammaticEnvironmental Impact Statement toward an ecosystem approach for the WesternPacific Region [electronic resource] : from species-based fishery managementplans to place-based fishery ecosystem plans**
 
FPEIS| Appendices
 
SuDoc Number:C 55.34/2:R 31/3
Item Number:0250-E-18 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000785216
 
August 29, 2019
2007 D e c i sion s O p inion s of the U nit e d S t at e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit 5-22-2007 

# U SA v . W o o d P r e c e de n t i al or N on-P r e c e de n t i al : P r e c e de n t i al D ocke t N o . 06-1372

F o l low thi s a nd a dd it ion al work s at : http://d i git alc ommon s .l a w . vi l l a no va . e du/thir dc ir c uit_2007

Thi s de c i sion i s br ou ght t o you for f r e e a nd ope n a c c e s s b y the O p inion s of the U nit e d S t at e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit at V i l l a no va U nive r sity S choo l of L a

w Di git al Reposit or y

. It h as be e n a c c ept e d for inclusion in 2007 D e c i sion s b y a n author i z e d a dmini s tr at or of V i l l a no va U nive r sity S choo l of L a

w Di git al Reposit or y

. F or mor e inform at ion, p le as e c on t a ct Be n j amin . C a rl s on@l a

w . vi l l a no va . e du . Re c omme nde d C it at ion
" U SA v . W ood " (2007). 2007 D e cisio n s . P ape r 1028. http://d i git alc ommon s .l a

w . vi l l a no va . e du/thir dc ir c uit_2007/1028P RE CE DE NT I AL UN I TED STATES CO UR T OF A PP EALS F O R T H E T H IR D C IR C U IT N o. 06- 1372 UN I TED STATES
v. S HAHE E D WOOD, A ppel l ant O n A p p ea l from the U n it ed S tat es D istri ct C o u rt f o r th e E a ste rn D istric t o f P e n n sy lv a n ia ( D . C . C r i m i nal N o. 04- 00431) H onor abl e J . C ur t i s J oyner , D i s t r i ctJ udge A r gued M ar ch 16, 2007 B E FO R E : FU E N T E S, G R E E N B E R G and LO U R I E *, C i r cui tJ udges

OR DE R A M E ND I NG OP I NI ON A t th e d ire c tio n o f

th e C o u rt, th e o p in io n f iled o n M a y1 7 , 2 0 0 7 is a m e n d e d to corr ectt he spell i ng of the at t orneyfor A pp el l ant as foll ow s: M ar k S. G r eenbe r g ( ar gued)

___________________ *H onor abl e A l an D . L our i e, U ni t ed St at es C i r cui tJ udge fort he Feder al C i r cui t , s i t t i ng by des i gnat i on.F o r th e C o u rt, / s / M ar ci a M . W al dr on C lerk D A T E D : M ay22, 2007 t m k/ cc: M ar k S. G r eenbe r g, E s q. J os e R . A r t eaga , E s q.
<PAGE>

                                                                 Exhibit 32(a)



                                 TXU GAS COMPANY
                       Certificate Pursuant to Section 906
                         of Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002
                              CERTIFICATION OF CEO


      The undersigned, Erle Nye, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive of
TXU Gas Company (the "Company"), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:

  1. The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,
     2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of section
     13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

  2. Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
     Company.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this instrument to be
executed this 13th day of August, 2003.





                                   /s/ Erle Nye
                           --------------------------------------------------
                           Name:    Erle Nye
                           Title:   Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive










A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has
been  provided  to TXU Gas  Company  and will be retained by TXU Gas Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
1433.203 Applicability. ( a ) The CO shall prepare any determination that application of the Contract Disputes Act to contracts with a foreign or international organization would not be in the public interest and forward it to the HCA for review. The HCA shall be responsible for submitting the determination through the Director, PAM, to the AS/PMB for approval.
( b ) The CBCA is authorized by the Contract Disputes Act or by the Secretary to consider and determine an appeal from a decision of a CO on a claim arising under or relating to a contract made by DOI.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

SONION NEDERLAND BV, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) No. 12 C 76

)

ASIUS TECHNOLOGIES LLC, )

)

Defendant. )

MEMORANDUM ORDER

This action, which has been pending for something less than

two weeks short of a year, has just been transferred to this

District Court from the United States District Court for the

District of Delaware and has been assigned at random to this

Court’s calendar. Although the November 18 and December 21, 2011

opinions by Delaware District Judge Robert Kugler granted that

transfer under 28 U.S.C. §1404(a) as appropriate in terms of the

“first-filed” rule (this Court’s colleague Honorable John Grady

has on his calendar an earlier-filed action between the same

parties and posing the same issues (at least in part), this case

does not qualify for direct assignment to Judge Grady under our

District Court’s LR 40.3--hence the random assignment to this

Court’s calendar is entirely proper.

That said, however, the same facts appear to portend the

prospect of a motion for reassignment to Judge Grady’s calendar

under LR 40.4 on grounds of relatedness. Meanwhile, though, the

case is before this Court. It therefore orders an early status

Case: 1:12-cv-00076 Document #: 43 Filed: 01/10/12 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:449
hearing at 9:30 a.m. January 19, 2012 for the purpose of

discussing the future course of this litigation.

________________________________________

Milton I. Shadur

Senior United States District Judge

Date: January 10, 2012

2

Case: 1:12-cv-00076 Document #: 43 Filed: 01/10/12 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:450
#### 1901.403 Individual deviations.

Deviations from the IAAR or the FAR in individual cases shall be authorized by the Board Procurement Executive or a designee unless FAR 1.405(e) is applicable. The request shall cite the specific part of the IAAR or FAR from which it is desired to deviate; shall set forth the nature of the deviation(s); and shall give the reason for the action requested.
#### Reginald N. Szczepanski et al., Respondents, v Security Mutual Fire Insurance Co. of New York et al., Appellants.

In an action to recover the proceeds of certain insurance policies issued by the defendants to the plaintiffs, the appeal is from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated May 16, 1978, which granted the plaintiffs’ motion to strike the defendants’ answer for failure to comply with a previous order of the same court. Order reversed, without costs or disbursements, and plaintiffs’ motion denied on condition that defendants’ attorney, Whitman & Ransom, personally pay $250 to plaintiffs within 20 days after entry of the order to be made hereon; in the event that such condition is not complied with, order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. The record does not suggest that the conduct of defendants or their counsel was willful or contumacious. Therefore, it was an improvident exercise of discretion to employ the drastic remedy of striking the defendants’ answer (see *Balsam v Nicolosi Bldg. Co.,*36 AD2d 533). However, a penalty is imposed because of the failure to timely respond to the plaintiffs’ interrogatories. Hopkins, J. P., Suozzi, Rabin and Shapiro, JJ., concur.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS, EASTERN DIVISION 

SERTA, INC., 

a Delaware Corporation, 

Plaintiff 

v. 

OLEG CASSINI, INC., 

a New York Corporation, Defendant. 

Case No.: 1:11- CV-08004 

Honorable Robert M. Dow Jr. 

NOTICE OF DISMISSAL

 Plaintiff, Serta, Inc., by and through its attorneys, Quarles & Brady LLP, hereby 

dismisses this action with prejudice pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 

41(a)(1)(i). Plaintiff hereby certifies that no Answer or Motion for Summary Judgment has been 

filed by any adverse party. 

 

 

Dated: August 20, 2012 Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ Nicole M. Murray 

Nicole M. Murray 

Nicole A. Bashor 

Quarles & Brady, LLP 

300 North LaSalle Street, Suite 4000 

Chicago, IL 60654-3422 

Attorneys for Plaintiff Serta, Inc. 

Case: 1:11-cv-08004 Document #: 32 Filed: 08/20/12 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:210
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing NOTICE OF DISMISSAL was filed 

electronically. Notice of this filing will be sent by operation of the Court’s electronic filing 

system (ECF) on this 20th day of August 2012 upon the following: 

 Joseph F. Schmidt 

John F. Kennedy 

Erin K. Lynch 

Shefsky & Froelich Ltd. 

111 East Wacker Drive 

Suite 2800 

Chicago, Illinois 60601 

 /s/ Nicole M. Murray 

 Attorney for Plaintiff Serta, Inc. 

 

QB\17809019.1 

Case: 1:11-cv-08004 Document #: 32 Filed: 08/20/12 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:211