alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-6529

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus TIMOTHY WATSON, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (CR-97-4, CA-00-874-7) Submitted: June 20, 2002 Decided: June 27, 2002 Before MICHAEL and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Timothy Watson, Appellant Pro Se. Donald Ray Wolthuis, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Timothy Watson seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Watson , Nos. CR-97-4; CA-00- 874-7 (W.D. Va. Jan. 22, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
1845.607-2 Recovering precious metals. (NASA supplements paragraph (b)). ( b ) Silver, gold, platinum, palladium, rhodium, iridium, osmium, and ruthenium; scrap bearing such metals; and items containing recoverable quantities of them shall be reported to the Defense Reutilization and Marketing Service, DRMS-R, Federal Center, Battle Creek, MI 49017-3092, for instructions regarding disposition.
216.505 Ordering. ( a ) *General.* ( 6 ) Orders placed under indefinite-delivery contracts may be issued on DD Form 1155, Order for Supplies or Services. (S-70) Departments and agencies shall comply with the review, approval, and reporting requirements established in accordance with subpart 217.7 when placing orders under non-DoD contracts in amounts exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold. (S-71) See 204.7603 for procedures on the required use of the Supplier Performance Risk System (SPRS) risk assessments. ( i ) The contracting officer shall ensure SPRS assessments of price risk and supplier risk are considered as a part of the award decision.
( ii ) When placing an order for an end product identified by a material identifier that is available as described at PGI 204.7603, and item risk was not previously considered during award of the contract, the contracting officer shall also consider SPRS assessments of item risk in the award decision.
( iii ) Use the provision at 252.204-7024, Notice on the Use of the Supplier Performance Risk System, as prescribed in 204.7604 to the extent permitted by the contract. (b) *Orders under multiple-award contracts.* (1) *Fair opportunity.* ( A ) See 215.101-2-70 for the limitations and prohibitions on the use of the lowest price technically acceptable source selection process, which are applicable to orders placed against multiple award indefinite delivery contracts.
( B ) See 217.7801 for the prohibition on the use of reverse auctions for personal protective equipment and aviation critical safety items.
( b ) (2) *Exceptions to the fair opportunity process.* For an order exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, that is a follow-on to an order previously issued for the same supply or service based on a justification for an exception to fair opportunity citing the authority at FAR 16.505(b)(2)(i)(B) or (C), follow the procedures at PGI 216.505(b)(2). ( 6 ) *Postaward notices and debriefing of awardees for orders exceeding $6 million.* In addition to the notice required at FAR 16.505(b)(6), a written or oral postaward debriefing of successful and unsuccessful awardees is required for task orders and delivery orders valued at $10 million or more (section 818 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 (Pub. L. 115-91)). ( ii ) Follow the procedures at 215.506 and 215.506-70 when providing the postaward debriefing to successful and unsuccessful awardees for task orders or delivery orders valued at $10 million or more.
[63 FR 11529, Mar. 9, 1998, as amended at 70 FR 29642, May 24, 2005; 71 FR 14103, Mar. 21, 2006; 80 FR 21657, Apr. 20, 2015; 80 FR 67255, Oct. 30, 2015; 84 FR 50789, Sept. 26, 2019; 87 FR 15810, Mar. 18, 2022; 88 FR 17339, Mar. 22, 2023]
#### Howard Arnold v. Wisner Park Corp. et al.

Motion for leave to dispense with printing granted insofar as to permit the appeal to be heard upon a typewritten record, without printing the same, and upon typewritten *647or mimeographed appellant’s points, on condition that the appellant serves one copy of the typewritten or mimeographed record and one copy of the typewritten or mimeographed appellant’s points upon the attorney for defendants-respondents and files 6 typewritten or 19 mimeographed copies of both the record on appeal and appellant’s points with this court on or before August 14, 1962, with notice of argument for the September 1962 Term of this court, said appeal to be argued or submitted when reached. Concur—Breitel, J. P., Rabin, Valente, McNally and Eager, JJ.
#### James J. McLaughlin v. Stephen Mallory et al.

Motion to dismiss appeal granted, with $10 costs, unless the appellant procures the record on appeal and appellant’s points to be served and filed on or before October 4, 1960, with notice of argument for the November 1960 Term of this court, said appeal to be argued or submitted when reached. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, McNally and Stevens, JJ.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 5.0.3

Eastern Division

Kimberley E O'Brien

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:12−cv−01201

Honorable Edmond E. Chang

Kevin Anderson

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Wednesday, September 12, 2012:

 MINUTE entry before Honorable Edmond E. Chang: Status and motion hearing

held. For the reasons stated in open court, Plaintiff's motion to compel [41] is denied in

large part and granted in part, specifically, to allow Plaintiff to take the deposition of Mr.

Napolitano. Also, as explained in open court, Defendant's motion to preclude punitive

damages [47] is denied. In sum, Defendant's motion is really a partial summary judgment

motion. Thus, the evidence must be viewed in the light most favorable to Plaintiff and all

reasonable inferences must be drawn in her favor. Her own deposition testimony sets

forth, if believed, a pattern of abuse that would readily justify the imposition of punitive

damages by a reasonable jury. The Court was informed that both parties have disclosed

experts, and that 1 expert deposition is needed (due to scheduling conflicts, the deposition

may be taken anytime up to the next status hearing). Status hearing set for 11/15/12 at

8:30 a.m. If the parties decide before the next status hearing that they would like a

settlement conference, they may call the Courtroom Deputy, Sandra Brooks @ (312)

408−5121, for a referral to the magistrate judge. Mailed notice(slb, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:12-cv-01201 Document #: 90 Filed: 09/12/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:3284
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT

Everett McKinley Dirksen UnitedStatesCourthouse

 Room 2722 - 219 S. Dearborn Street

 Chicago, Illinois 60604

Office of the Clerk

Phone: (312) 435-5850

www.ca7.uscourts.gov

November 14, 2014

No.: 14-3061

LAURA YASKO, on behalf of Alan Yasko, 

Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

RELIANCE STANDARD LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, 

Defendant - Appellant

 Originating Case Information:

District Court No: 1:12-cv-02658

Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division

District Judge John J. Tharp

Upon consideration of the AGREED MOTION FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL,

filed on November 14, 2014,. by counsel for Appellant Reliance Standard Life

Insurance Company, 

IT IS ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED, pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate

Procedure 42(b).

form name: c7_FinalOrderWMandate(form ID: 137)

Case: 14-3061 Document: 00712419716 Filed: 11/14/2014 Pages: 1

Case: 1:12-cv-02658 Document #: 70 Filed: 11/14/14 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:1726
Docket No: FAA- 2015 - 0251 Dir ID: 2014 - NM - 200 -AD

. **Contacts.** With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed?

Organization Person Contacted **Date** Response **National Business Aircraft Association Eli Cotti**  10/9/14 **Regional Airline Association**  10/9/14 **Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association Robert Hackman**  10/9/14 **Airlines for America Robert Ireland**  10/9/14
#### § 228.6 Security inspection.

Any personal property, including but not limited to any packages, briefcases, containers or vehicles brought into, while on, or being removed from protected property are subject to inspection. A search of a person may accompany an investigative stop or an arrest.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Synthetic Blood International, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended October 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert W. Nicora, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                  |  |                                      
|----------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|December 15, 2004 |  | /s/ Robert W. Nicora                 
|                  |  | President and Chief Executive Officer



CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Synthetic Blood International, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended October 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David H. Johnson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                  |  |                        
|----------------- |  | -----------------------
|December 15, 2004 |  | /s/ David H. Johnson   
|                  |  | Chief Financial Officer



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Synthetic Blood International, Inc. and will be retained by Synthetic Blood International, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>

                                                               Exhibit 10.13

                              FIRST LEASE AMENDMENT

Being successor Lessor and original Lessee under a lease ("Lease") dated in
December, 1997, covering space in Millbrook Tarry Condominium, Lowell Road,
Concord, MA, the undersigned hereby amend the Lease as follows:

1. As of June 1, 1999, the Premises under the Lease shall be increased by adding
thereto the space ("Added Space") in condominium Unit A-12, which space is
located on the second floor of the building and is approximately shown on
Exhibit A attached hereto. The Added Space, which the parties agree is 800
rentable square feet, is only that internal office space currently occupied by
Mykrowaters and does not include the adjacent corridor. As used in the Lease,
"Unit" shall refer to both Unit A-12 and Unit A-13. The Added Space is delivered
"as is" and Lessor shall have no obligation to make any improvements or do any
work thereto.

2. Commencing June 1, 1999, the rent shall be increased by $20,000 per year, or
a total rent for the Premises (as hereby increased by the Added Space) of
$95,439.88 per year, payable in equal monthly installments of $7,953.32. Such
total rent shall increase on January 1, 2000 and January 1, 2001, by five
percent (5%).

3. With the execution hereof, Lessee shall pay a further security deposit of
$1,666.67.

4. Lessee's right of first refusal is subject to any prior rights of first
refusal.

5. Lessee is aware that the Added Space is: a) subject to a right of first
refusal to lease held by Maximum Image, and b) now occupied by Mykrowaters.
Lessor agrees promptly after this Amendment is signed to request a waiver from
Maximum Image of its right of first refusal and, if that waiver is obtained, to
give notice to quit to Mykrowaters. This Amendment shall be null and void if
Maximum Image exercises its right of first refusal. If Maximum Image waives its
right of first refusal and Mykrowaters does not vacate the Added Space by June
1, 1999, the commencement of the rent increase referred to in Section 2 hereof
shall take place on the date Mykrowaters shall vacate the Added Space. If
Mykrowaters does not vacate the Added Space by September 1, 1999, either party
may thereafter terminate this Amendment by notice to the other. Notwithstanding
the foregoing, if Mykrowaters shall vacate the Added Space prior to June 1,
1999, then the Added Space shall be added to the Premises, and the rent shall
increase, as of the date Mykrowaters vacates.

As hereby amended, the Lease shall remain in full force and effect.

This instrument is executed under seal as of April , 1999.

LANDLORD                                        TENANT
Military Retail Registered LLP                  Gomez Advisors, Inc.
by: ELAW Corporation, Managing Partner


by                                              by  /s/ Julio Gomez
   -------------------------------------           -----------------------------
   James B. White, President                       Julio Gomez, President
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Harvey M. Ashley, Appellant.

Motion by appellant to dispense with printing granted. The appeal will be heard on the original papers (including the typed minutes) and on appellant’s typewritten brief. The appellant is directed to file six copies of his brief and to serve one copy on the District Attorney. Appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged to the April Term, beginning March 27, 1961; appeal ordered on the calendar for said term. Motion for assignment of counsel granted. Meyer F. Goodman, Esq., 136 South Main Street, Freeport, New York, is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Ughetta, Kleinfeld and Christ, JJ., concur.
Case: 1:12-cv-02636 Document #: 30 Filed: 08/20/13 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:189
Case: 1:12-cv-02636 Document #: 30 Filed: 08/20/13 Page 2 of 5 PageID #:190
Case: 1:12-cv-02636 Document #: 30 Filed: 08/20/13 Page 3 of 5 PageID #:191
Case: 1:12-cv-02636 Document #: 30 Filed: 08/20/13 Page 4 of 5 PageID #:192
Case: 1:12-cv-02636 Document #: 30 Filed: 08/20/13 Page 5 of 5 PageID #:193
**EXHIBIT23.1**

 

**Consent of Independent Auditors**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the RegistrationStatements Nos. 33-42214, 33-98160, 333-80857 and 333-80843 on Form S-8 ofAXCESS Inc. of our report dated March 3, 2004, with respect to the consolidatedfinancial statements of AXCESS Inc. as December 31, 2003 and 2002 and forthe years then ended included in its Annual Report (Form 10-KSB) for the yearended December 31, 2003.

 

 
|                | /s/ Hein & Associates LLP |   |
|---------------------|-------------------------------|--------|
|                |                          |
| March 30, 2004 |                          |
| Dallas, Texas       |                          |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the
consolidated  balance sheet of Bryan Steam  Corporation as of December 31, 1996,
and the related condensed consolidated income statement for the six-month period
then ended,  and is qualified  in its  entirety by  reference to such  financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000014971
<NAME>                        Bryan Steam Corporation
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-1-1995
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1.000
<CASH>                                          1,017,844
<SECURITIES>                                    1,325,467
<RECEIVABLES>                                   4,428,814
<ALLOWANCES>                                       24,718
<INVENTORY>                                     3,830,222
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               11,080,769
<PP&E>                                          8,194,621
<DEPRECIATION>                                  3,159,374
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 16,362,444
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           2,107,924
<BONDS>                                            29,576
<COMMON>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                       810,272
<OTHER-SE>                                              0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   16,362,444
<SALES>                                        13,910,753
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               13,996,884
<CGS>                                           9,031,931
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   3,222,524
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 51,189
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 1,691,240
<INCOME-TAX>                                      660,858
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             1,030,382
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                    1,030,382
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        5.39
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        5.39
        


</TABLE>
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 939 

To reserve any amounts forfeited to the United States Government as a 

result of the criminal prosecution of Joaquin Archivaldo Guzman Loera 

(commonly known as ‘‘El Chapo’’), or of other felony convictions involving the transportation of controlled substances into the United States, 

for security measures along the Southern border, including the completion of a border wall. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 25, 2017 

Mr. CRUZ introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To reserve any amounts forfeited to the United States Government as a result of the criminal prosecution of Joaquin Archivaldo Guzman Loera (commonly known as ‘‘El 

Chapo’’), or of other felony convictions involving the 

transportation of controlled substances into the United 

States, for security measures along the Southern border, 

including the completion of a border wall. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 939 IS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Ensuring Lawful Col3 lection of Hidden Assets to Provide Order Act’’ or the 

4 ‘‘EL CHAPO Act’’. 

5 SEC. 2. USE OF CERTAIN FORFEITED CRIMINAL PROCEEDS 

6 FOR BORDER SECURITY MEASURES. 

7 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any ille8 gally obtained profits resulting from any criminal drug 

9 trafficking enterprise led by Joaquin Archivaldo Guzman 

10 Loera (commonly known as ‘‘El Chapo’’), which are crimi11 nally forfeited to the United States Government as a re12 sult of the conviction of Mr. Guzman Loera in Federal 

13 District court, shall be reserved for security measures 

14 along the border between the United States and Mexico, 

15 including the completion of a wall along such border, for 

16 the purpose of stemming the flow of illegal narcotics into 

17 the United States and furthering the Nation’s security. 

18 SEC. 3. USE OF FORFEITED CRIMINAL PROCEEDS OF 

19 OTHER CONVICTED CARTEL MEMBERS. 

20 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any 

21 funds that are criminally forfeited to the United States 

22 Government as the result of a felony conviction in a Fed23 eral district court of a member of a drug cartel—an indi24 vidual engaging in a continuing criminal enterprise involv25 ing knowingly and intentionally distributing a controlled 

26 substance, intending and knowing that such substance 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 939 IS

1 would be unlawfully imported into the United States from 

2 a place outside of the United States—shall be reserved 

3 for security measures along the border between the United 

4 States and Mexico, including the completion of a wall 

5 along such border, for the purpose of stemming the flow 

6 of illegal narcotics into the United States and furthering 

7 the Nation’s security. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
U.S. Dept Commerce/NOAA/NMFS/NWFSC/Publications NOAA-NMFS-NWFSC TM-9: Effectiveness of Predator Removal for Protecting Juvenile Fall Chinook Salmon Released from Bonneville Hatchery, 1991 
Figure 3. The study area showing the electrofishing areas in Tanner Creek and adjacent shoreline areas of the Columbia River, 1991. 

Use your browser's BACK button to return to the text. 

Table of Contents