alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report of Jo-Ann Stores, Inc.
(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended May 1, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) on or about the date hereof
(the Report), each of the undersigned officers of the Company certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to such officers knowledge:  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. Dated: June 10, 2004/s/ Alan RosskammAlan RosskammPresident and Chief Executive Officer/s/ Brian P. CarneyBrian P. CarneyExecutive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer
 A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon
request.
(October 26, 1964)

#### In the Matter of Andrew Alberti, Petitioner, v. Thomas Dickens, as Justice of the Supreme Court of the County of New York, et al., Respondents.

— Motion unanimously granted on condition that petitioner appears and testifies before the Grand Jury, New York County, on November 4, 1964. Warden of Civil Prison of City of New York ordered to release petitioner from custody forthwith. Concur — Rabin, J. P., Valente, Eager and Steuer, JJ.
Case: 1:12-cv-02571 Document #: 72 Filed: 01/30/14 Page 1 of 25 PageID #:697
Case: 1:12-cv-02571 Document #: 72 Filed: 01/30/14 Page 2 of 25 PageID #:698
Case: 1:12-cv-02571 Document #: 72 Filed: 01/30/14 Page 3 of 25 PageID #:699
Case: 1:12-cv-02571 Document #: 72 Filed: 01/30/14 Page 4 of 25 PageID #:700
Case: 1:12-cv-02571 Document #: 72 Filed: 01/30/14 Page 5 of 25 PageID #:701
Case: 1:12-cv-02571 Document #: 72 Filed: 01/30/14 Page 6 of 25 PageID #:702
Case: 1:12-cv-02571 Document #: 72 Filed: 01/30/14 Page 7 of 25 PageID #:703
Case: 1:12-cv-02571 Document #: 72 Filed: 01/30/14 Page 8 of 25 PageID #:704
Case: 1:12-cv-02571 Document #: 72 Filed: 01/30/14 Page 9 of 25 PageID #:705
Case: 1:12-cv-02571 Document #: 72 Filed: 01/30/14 Page 10 of 25 PageID #:706
Case: 1:12-cv-02571 Document #: 72 Filed: 01/30/14 Page 11 of 25 PageID #:707
Case: 1:12-cv-02571 Document #: 72 Filed: 01/30/14 Page 12 of 25 PageID #:708
Case: 1:12-cv-02571 Document #: 72 Filed: 01/30/14 Page 13 of 25 PageID #:709
Case: 1:12-cv-02571 Document #: 72 Filed: 01/30/14 Page 14 of 25 PageID #:710
Case: 1:12-cv-02571 Document #: 72 Filed: 01/30/14 Page 15 of 25 PageID #:711
Case: 1:12-cv-02571 Document #: 72 Filed: 01/30/14 Page 16 of 25 PageID #:712
Case: 1:12-cv-02571 Document #: 72 Filed: 01/30/14 Page 17 of 25 PageID #:713
Case: 1:12-cv-02571 Document #: 72 Filed: 01/30/14 Page 18 of 25 PageID #:714
Case: 1:12-cv-02571 Document #: 72 Filed: 01/30/14 Page 19 of 25 PageID #:715
Case: 1:12-cv-02571 Document #: 72 Filed: 01/30/14 Page 20 of 25 PageID #:716
Case: 1:12-cv-02571 Document #: 72 Filed: 01/30/14 Page 21 of 25 PageID #:717
Case: 1:12-cv-02571 Document #: 72 Filed: 01/30/14 Page 22 of 25 PageID #:718
Case: 1:12-cv-02571 Document #: 72 Filed: 01/30/14 Page 23 of 25 PageID #:719
Case: 1:12-cv-02571 Document #: 72 Filed: 01/30/14 Page 24 of 25 PageID #:720
Case: 1:12-cv-02571 Document #: 72 Filed: 01/30/14 Page 25 of 25 PageID #:721
#### In the Matter of Theresa Jones, Respondent, v Troy Mitchell, Appellant.

— Order, Family Court, New York County, entered February 15, 1977, adjudicating respondent-appellant as the father of the child the subject of this paternity proceeding, unanimously affirmed, without costs or disbursements. Order, Family Court, New York County, entered July 18, 1977, unanimously modified, on the law, on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, to the extent of substituting a direction that respondent-appellant pay to petitioner-respondent for the support of the child the sum of $30 per week, reducing the award for counsel fees to $1,000, and otherwise affirmed, without costs or disbursements. We find the award of counsel fees and the support directed to be paid by the Family Court to be excessive to the extent indicated. The modification of the award also conforms to the applicable standard to be applied with respect to children born out of wedlock under section 513 of the Family Court Act, which limits the obligation of support, imposing liability upon each parent of a child born out of wedlock for the necessary support and education of the child. Concur— Murphy, P. J., Lupiano, Silverman, Evans and Fein, JJ.
**Availability of OCR services:** OCR will provide all customers with access to its case resolution process by making staff available to speak with customers at a time and in a manner that are mutually convenient, and by making OCR’s services readily available.

**Clarity of communication:** OCR’s communication with customers, including customers who have limited English proficiency and customers with disabilities, will be clear and understandable.

**Consideration for customers:** OCR will be considerate of customers’ needs and circumstances, including time, when making requests for data or other information. 

**Courtesy:** OCR will treat all customers with courtesy and respect.

**Fairness:** OCR will conduct case resolution activities in a manner that is objective, unbiased, and impartial.

**High quality of case resolution activities:** All OCR case resolution activities will be conducted consistent with applicable laws, regulations, policies, and procedures and established agency quality standards.

**Professionalism:** OCR will abide by applicable standards of conduct, privacy requirements, and Departmental regulations, policies, and procedures.

**Promptness:** OCR will conduct case resolution activities in a timely and efficient manner, and will respond to telephone calls and correspondence from customers promptly.

**Communication about the status of cases:** OCR will communicate with appropriate frequency with customers about the status of their case.

**Responses to questions:** OCR will listen carefully to and work to understand all customer concerns and questions, and will provide appropriate information in response.

Top
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Myron E. Wilson, Appellant.

Upon the opinion of the Court of Appeals (7 N Y 2d 568) and upon its remittitur, dated April 21, 1960, to this court and to the County Court, Westchester County, this court on June 10, 1960, made an order vacating its prior order, dated September 9, 1959, dismissing defendant’s appeal from an order of said 'County Court, entered May 9, 1958, denying his *coram nobis*application. Based upon the foregoing this court now vacates its prior order of March 23, 1959, insofar as it denies defendant’s motion for leave to appeal as a poor person. On reconsideration, such motion will be treated as a motion to dispense with printing. Motion granted. The appeal will be heard on the original papers (including the typed minutes) and on a typewritten brief. The appellant is directed to file five copies of his brief and to serve one copy on the District Attorney. The defendant’s time to perfect his appeal is enlarged to the October term, beginning October 3,1960, for which term the appeal is ordered to be placed on the calendar. Joseph A. Liehtenthal, Esq., 175 Main Street, White Plains, New York, is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Ughetta, Christ and Pette, JJ., concur.
Bryan W. Shaw, Ph.D., Chairman 

Carlos Rubinstein, Commissioner 

Toby Baker, Commissr'oner 

Zak Covar ~ Executir..'€ Director 

RECEIVED - 6P'DL 

AIR PLANNING SEC. 

13 fEB -4 PH 5: 07 

TEXAS COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY 

Protecting Texas by Redudng and Preventing Pollution 

January 28, 2013 

Mr. Guy Donaldson 

Chief, Air Planning Section ( 6PD-L) 

91 7108 2133 3935 1971 0397 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region VI 

1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 1200 

Dallas, TX 75202-2733 

Subject: Negative Declaration of the Presence of Sewage Sludge Incineration (SSI) Units in Texas 

Dear Mr. Donaldson: 

The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ or commission), Air Permits Division, is 

submitting a negative declaration of the presence of any existing SSI units for which construction 

commenced on or before October 14, 2010, in Texas. 

On Mareh 21, 2011, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) promulgated Standards of 

Peiformancefor New Stationary Sources and Emission Guidelines for Existing Sources: Sewage Sludge 

Incineration Units (76 FR 15372). Under this rule, new SSI units are subject to title 40 Code of Federal 

Regulations, Part 60, Subpart LLLL and existing SSI units (those commencing construction on or before 

October 14, 2010) are subject to emission guidelines under Subpart MMMM. 

To develop this negative declaration, commission staff reviewed the most recent emissions inventory 

(2010) and new source review (NSR) and Title V permits for sources in the relevant North American 

Industry Classification System (NAICS) codes (562213 and 221320). Facilities identified as falling under 

these NAICS codes in the emissions inventory were contacted and asked if they had SSI units. Similarly, 

all Texas NSR and Title V permits for facilities under these NAICS codes were reviewed to determine if SSI 

units were present. In addition, staff reviewed the EPA's Inventory Database for the SSI Source Category 

(http://www.epa.gov/ttn/atwll2g/ssi/ssj inventozymemo.pdO. 

This review revealed no new units and one existing source with two SSI units operated by the City of Fort 

Worth {NSR Permit #7553). These SSI units have not been operated since August 5, 2010, and have been 

locked out and tagged out to prevent operation pursuant to Occupational Safety and Health 

Administration guidelines. On December 18, 2012, the City of Fort Worth filed a permit application with 

TCEQ to remove the SSI equipment and requirements from the permit. Therefore, there are no SSI units 

in Texas subject to the emission guidelines. 

The TCEQ appreciates EPA's consideration on this matter. Please contact Ms. Megan Hamilton (512-239-

1582) on my staff for any questions you may have. 

Sincerely, 

A~Kdtd~ ~ Mich~~ P. Wilson, P .E. 

Air Permits Division Director 

Office of Air 

Texas Commission on Environmental Quality 

CC: Mr. Jerry Pressley, City of Fort Worth Village Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant 

MPW/mch/mcw 

P.O. Box 13087 • Austin, Texas 78711-3087 • 512·239-1000 • tceq.texas.gov 

How is our customer serviee? tceq.texas.govjcustomersurvey
Exhibit 32.1

 

Certification of the President and Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

I, Bowen S. Diehl, President and Chief Executive Officer of Capital Southwest Corporation, certify that, to my knowledge:

|  | 1. |  | The Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2016, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 8, 2016 (“accompanied report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--|----|--|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | 2. |  | The information contained in the accompanied report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of Capital Southwest Corporation. |
|--|----|--|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

|                         |   |                                  |
|------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------|
| Date:  November 8, 2016 | By:    | /s/ Bowen S. Diehl                    |
|                         |   | Bowen S. Diehl                        |
|                         |   | President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
RELIABILITY INCORPORATED

SIGNATURES

September 30, 2008

Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Form 10-QSB of Reliability Incorporated (the Issuer) for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008 (the Periodic Report):



| | 1. | Fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Larry Edwards      
|Larry Edwards          
|Chief Executive Officer
|November 10, 2008
#### 2052.222-70 Nondiscrimination because of age.

As prescribed at 2022.901-70, the contracting officer shall insert the following clause in all solicitations:

# Nondiscrimination Because of Age (JAN 1993)

It is the policy of the Executive Branch of the Government that:

(a) Contractors and subcontractors engaged in the performance of Federal contracts may not, in connection with the employment, advancement, or discharge of employees or in connection with the terms, conditions, or privileges of their employment, discriminate against persons because of their age except upon the basis of a bona fide occupational qualification, retirement plan, or statutory requirement; and

(b) That contractors and subcontractors, or persons acting on their behalf, may not specify, in solicitations or advertisements for employees to work on Government contracts, a maximum age limit for employment unless the specified maximum age limit is based upon a bona fide occupational qualification, retirement plan, or statutory requirement.

(End of provision)
NO. 07-00-0419 -CR IN THE COU RT OF APP EALS FOR THE SEVENT H DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMA RILLO PANE L A MARC H 30, 2001

______________________________ ALLEN EUGENE M OTE, APPELLANT

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

_________________________________ FROM THE COUNT Y COURT AT LAW OF RANDALL CO UNTY; NO. 57,403-L; HON ORABLEJOHN T. FORB IS, JUDG E

_______________________________ Before BOYD, C.J., and REAVIS and JOHNSON, JJ. ON ABATEME NT AND REMAND AppellantAllen Eugene Mote was convicted of the m isdem eanor of fense of record of fraudulent court and sentenced on August 10, 200 0 , t o co nfin em ent in t he Rand all C ountyJail for 180 days and a fin e of $500, proba ted for two years. A pro se notice o f appeal was filed on Septem ber 11, 2000.2

We have received a portion of the reporter’srecord, but have not received the clerk’s record in this matter. W e have been notified by letter dated March 16, 2001, from the court c lerk that

appellant ha s failed to pay for p reparation of the record or to make satisfac tory arrangements with the clerk fo r doing so. Because we have responsibility to avo id further del ay and protect the pa rties’ ri ghts, w e ab atethis appeal and rema nd to the Randall County Court at Law for a hearing. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(a)(2). Upon reman d, the j udge of the trial court shall imm ediately cause notice to be given of and conduct a hearing to determine: 1. Whet her

app ellan t ha s ab and one d hisapp eal. 2. If app ell ant has n ot a ban don ed h is ap pea l, th e co urt sha ll determ ine if appellant is indi gent, and if so, w hether counsel should be appointed to re pr es en t h i m. 3. If appellant is not indigent, whether he has failed to m ake thenecess ary arrangement

s for prosecuting his appea l, and if he has not done so, w hat orders, if any, are necessary to ensure those arrangem ents are m ade. 4. If it be determ ined that an a ttorney should be appointed to represent appellant, the nam e, address, and S tate Bar of Tex as identification number of the attorney appointed. 5. If any other orders are necessary toensure the diligent and proper pursuit of this appeal. In support of its determ ination, the trial cou rt s hall p rep areand file written findings of fact and conclusions of law and cau se them to be included i n a supplemental cl erk’s record. The hearing proceedings shall be tr ans crib ed and included in a supplemental3

reporter’s record. Those supplem ental records shall be submitted to the clerk of t his court no later than May 1, 2 001. It is so ordered. Per Curiam Do not publish.
19.1301 General. ( a ) The Historically Underutilized Business Zone (HUBZone) Act of 1997 (15 U.S.C. 631 note) created the HUBZone Program.
( b ) The purpose of the HUBZone Program is to provide Federal contracting assistance for qualified small business concerns located in historically underutilized business zones, in an effort to increase employment opportunities, investment, and economic development in those areas.
[48 FR 42240, Sept. 19, 1983, as amended at 75 FR 77730, Dec. 13, 2010]
214.407-3 Other mistakes disclosed before award. ( e ) Authority for making a determination under FAR 14.407-3(a), (b) and (d) is delegated for the defense agencies, without power of redelegation, as follows: ( i ) Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency: General Counsel, DARPA.
( ii ) Defense Information Systems Agency: General Counsel, DISA.
( iii ) Defense Intelligence Agency: Principal Assistant for Acquisition.
( iv ) Defense Logistics Agency: ( A ) General Counsel, DLA; and
( B ) Associate General Counsel, DLA.
( v ) National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency: General Counsel, NGA.
( vi ) Defense Threat Reduction Agency: General Counsel, DTRA.
( vii ) National Security Agency: Director of Procurement, NSA.
( viii ) Missile Defense Agency: General Counsel, MDA.
( ix ) Defense Contract Management Agency: General Counsel, DCMA.
[57 FR 42629, Sept. 15, 1992, as amended at 59 FR 27669, May 27, 1994; 61 FR 50452, Sept. 26, 1996. Redesignated and amended at 62 FR 34122, June 24, 1997; 64 FR 51076, Sept. 21, 1999; 68 FR 7439, Feb. 14, 2003; 69 FR 65090, Nov. 10, 2004; 74 FR 42780, Aug. 25, 2009]
#### The People of the State of New York v. Vernal Frederick Seymour.

Motion granted and time for argument of appeal enlarged to include September 1962 Term, on condition appellant’s brief is filed and served on or before July 2, 1962. Memorandum: This direct appeal from the judgment of conviction has been pending for many months and there are also pending appeals from *coram nobis*and habeas corpus proceedings. Appellant’s brief should be filed promptly, on or before July 2, 1962. If the present assigned counsel is unable to comply, he should make an application on June 27, 1962, to be relieved of the assignment.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 2 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.Con.Res.2
                                       Agreed to January 3, 2017        

                     One Hundred Fifteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
          the third day of January, two thousand and seventeen

                          Concurrent Resolution

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That the two Houses of Congress shall meet in the Hall of the House of 
Representatives on Friday, the 6th day of January 2017, at 1 o'clock 
post meridian, pursuant to the requirements of the Constitution and 
laws relating to the election of President and Vice President of the 
United States, and the President of the Senate shall be their Presiding 
Officer; that two tellers shall be previously appointed by the 
President of the Senate on the part of the Senate and two by the 
Speaker on the part of the House of Representatives, to whom shall be 
handed, as they are opened by the President of the Senate, all the 
certificates and papers purporting to be certificates of the electoral 
votes, which certificates and papers shall be opened, presented, and 
acted upon in the alphabetical order of the States, beginning with the 
letter ``A''; and said tellers, having then read the same in the 
presence and hearing of the two Houses, shall make a list of the votes 
as they shall appear from said certificates; and the votes having been 
ascertained and counted in the manner and according to the rules by law 
provided, the result of the same shall be delivered to the President of 
the Senate, who shall thereupon announce the state of the vote, which 
announcement shall be deemed a sufficient declaration of the persons, 
if any, elected President and Vice President of the United States, and, 
together with a list of the votes, be entered on the Journals of the 
two Houses.
Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.
Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.
```
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 970 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 970

To amend title 38, United States Code, to improve the care provided by 
         the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to newborn children.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 27, 2017

  Ms. Klobuchar (for herself and Mr. Tillis) introduced the following 
 bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 38, United States Code, to improve the care provided by 
         the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to newborn children.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Newborn Care Improvement Act of 
2017''.

SEC. 2. IMPROVEMENT OF HEALTH CARE SERVICES PROVIDED TO NEWBORN 
              CHILDREN BY DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS.

    Section 1786 of title 38, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a), in the matter preceding paragraph 
        (1), by striking ``seven days'' and inserting ``14 days''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(c) Annual Report.--Not later than 31 days after the end of each 
fiscal year, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Veterans' 
Affairs of the Senate and the Committee on Veterans' Affairs of the 
House of Representatives a report on the health care services provided 
under subsection (a) during such fiscal year, including the number of 
newborn children who received such services during such fiscal year.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### Irving H. Dale, Appellant, v Aetna Industrial Corporation et al., Respondents.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on August 2, 1977, unanimously affirmed. Respondents shall recover of appellant $75 costs and disbursements of this appeal. Application on oral argument to submit surreply is denied. No opinion. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Lupiano, Evans, Markewich and Sullivan, JJ.