alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
balance sheet, statement of income, statement of retained earnings and
statement of cash flows contained in Form 10-Q of Canal Electric Company for
the three months ended March 31, 1997 and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000016906
<NAME> CANAL ELECTRIC COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                            <C>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                   MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-TYPE>                        3-MOS
<BOOK-VALUE>                      PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>          282,772
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>          3,197
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>              25,733
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>            24,924
<OTHER-ASSETS>                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     336,626
<COMMON>                            38,080
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>            8,321
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                 56,437
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>     102,838
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                    0
<PREFERRED>                              0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                83,626
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                  21,675
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>           0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>          350
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>         11,734
<LEASES-CURRENT>                       576
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>     115,827
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>      336,626
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>           61,686
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                 2,542
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>          53,109
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>          55,651
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>              6,035
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                     124
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>       6,159
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>             2,342
<NET-INCOME>                         3,817
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>              0
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>        3,817
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                 0
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>            1,978
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>              13,105
<EPS-PRIMARY>                            0
<EPS-DILUTED>                            0
        


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
balance sheet and statements of operations found on pages 17 and 18 of
the Company's Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended June 30, 1996, and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                          24,971
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   16,619      
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                41,590     
<PP&E>                                         805,175      
<DEPRECIATION>                                (107,129)        
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 739,636      
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           29,522     
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,500  
<OTHER-SE>                                     704,614      
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   739,636      
<SALES>                                         81,865     
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               586,442      
<CGS>                                           71,803     
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                84,648     
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0  
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                414,937
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            414,937      
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   414,937      
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .75  
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .75  

</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of Northville Dock Corporation, Respondent, v. James L. Kennedy et al., Individually and Doing Business as Howken Utilities, Judgment Debtors; Howken Utilities, Incorporated, Appellant.

Motion by appellant for a stay of its examination under a subpoena, pending appeal from an order denying its motion to vacate the subpoena, denied. Beldock, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ and Pette, JJ., concur; Ughetta, J., not voting.
TS- ACET10/20/30/40/50

Attachment #4

Pt. 2, Sec. A, 1d

Manufacturing and Processing Information on the New Chemical Substance s at

Industrial Sites Controlled by the SubmitterAttachment #4

**Manufacturing and Processing Information on the New Chemical**

**Substances at Industrial Sites Controlled by the Submitter**  TS

- ACET10/20/30/40/50
#### Hammontree *v.*Hammontree.

Lumpkin, J.

1. On the hearing of a rule to attach a husband for nonpayment of alimony previously awarded to his wife, to which the respondent filed an answer, alleging infidelity on the part of his wife and praying a revocation of the order awarding alimony, there was no error in overruling a motion for a continuance because of the absence of a witness living in a county other than that where the hearing was had, who, it was claimed, would testify that while the husband and wife were living together she sought to have an operation performed upon her to produce an abortion.

*811April 18, 1913.

Attachment for contempt. Before Judge Morris. Pickens superior court. June 22, 1912.

*F. 0. Tate, J. S. Wood,*and *O. II. Griffin,*for plaintiff in error.

*Isaac Grant,*contra.

2. Under the evidence there was no error in making the rule absolute.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
201.107 Certifications. In accordance with 41 U.S.C. 1304, a new requirement for a certification by a contractor or offeror may not be included in the DFARS unless— ( 1 ) The certification requirement is specifically imposed by statute; or
( 2 ) Written justification for such certification is provided to the Secretary of Defense by the Under Secretary of Defense (Acquisition and Sustainment), and the Secretary of Defense approves in writing the inclusion of such certification requirement.
[63 FR 11528, Mar. 9, 1998, as amended at 65 FR 39704, June 27, 2000; 76 FR 58137, Sept. 20, 2011; 77 FR 35879, June 15, 2012; 88 FR 73234, Oct. 25, 2023]
**Team V – General and Non-Loan Programmatic Issues**

PAGE  

1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                      12,249,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               51,689,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 5,854,000
<INVENTORY>                                  1,196,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            59,557,000
<PP&E>                                       3,280,170
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,672,071
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              69,523,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       42,917,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        2,078,000
<PREFERRED>                                    201,000
<COMMON>                                       252,000
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                69,523,000
<SALES>                                     10,004,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            10,004,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                           (7,017,000)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,306,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (4,871,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (4,871,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (4,871,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.45)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.45)
        

</TABLE>
Case: 1:12-cv-00481 Document #: 34-9 Filed: 02/21/13 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:425
Case: 1:12-cv-00481 Document #: 34-9 Filed: 02/21/13 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:426
Case: 1:12-cv-00481 Document #: 34-9 Filed: 02/21/13 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:427
#### 1852.232-82 Submission of requests for progress payments.

As prescribed in 1832.502-470, insert the following clause:

# Submission of Requests for Progress Payments (MAR 1989)

The Contractor shall request progress payments in accordance with the Progress Payments clause by submitting to the Contracting Officer an original and two copies of Standard Form (SF) 1443, Contractor's Request for Progress Payment, and the contractor's invoice (if applicable). The Contracting Officer's office is the designated billing office for progress payments for purposes of the Prompt Payment clause.

(End of clause)
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-50232

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

GABRIEL LIMON,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 2:06-CR-901-5

Before DENNIS, PRADO, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Gabriel Limon has 

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th 

Cir. 2011). Limon has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief 

and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with 

counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 20, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 16-50232 Document: 00513805010 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/20/2016
No. 16-50232

2

appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is 

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the 

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 16-50232 Document: 00513805010 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/20/2016
212.7004 Procedures. This section prescribes procedures for the use of a CSO. ( a ) The CSO shall— ( 1 ) Describe the agency's interest for an individual program requirement or for broadly defined areas of interest covering the full range of the agency's requirements;
( 2 ) Specify the technical data required that may be necessary to meet DoD's minimum requirements (see 227.7102 and 227.7202);
( 3 ) Describe the evaluation factors for selecting proposals to include— ( i ) Technical and importance to agency programs as the primary evaluation factors;
( ii ) Price to the extent appropriate, but at a minimum to determine that the price is fair and reasonable; and
( iii ) Relative importance of the factors, and the method of evaluation;
( 4 ) Specify the period of time during which proposals submitted in response to the CSO will be accepted; and
( 5 ) Contain instructions for the preparation and submission of proposals.
( b ) The contracting officer shall publicize the CSO through the Governmentwide point of entry and, if authorized pursuant to FAR subpart 5.5, may also publish a notice regarding the CSO in noted scientific, technical, or engineering periodicals. The contracting officer shall publish the notice at least annually.
( c ) Proposals received in response to the CSO shall be evaluated in accordance with evaluation factors specified therein through a scientific, technological, or other subject-matter expert peer review process. Written evaluation reports on individual proposals are required, but proposals need not be evaluated against each other since they are not submitted in response to a common performance work statement or statement of work.
( d ) Synopsis of proposed contract actions under FAR subpart 5.2 of individual contract actions based upon proposals received in response to the CSO is not required. The notice published pursuant to paragraph (b) of this section fulfills the synopsis requirement.
( e ) When a small business concern would otherwise be selected for award but is considered not responsible, follow the Small Business Administration Certificate of Competency procedure (see FAR subpart 19.6).
( f ) The contracting officer shall document the decision that the requirements of this subpart have been met and include the documentation in the contract file.
|   | (1) | The      accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter      ended February 28, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of Section      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;  and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the accompanying Report fairly presents, in all      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of      the Company. |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/ Fred R. Adams, Jr.                                                 |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Fred      R. Adams, Jr.                                                |
| Chairman      of the Board and Chief Executive Officer                 |
|                                                                   |
| /s/  Timothy A.      Dawson                                  |
|  Timothy      A. Dawson                                           |
| Vice      President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and  Secretary |

----
Exhibit 31.2
 
      a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andd)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 June 6, 2011
    /s/ J. Per BrodinJ. Per BrodinChief Financial Officer
Exhibit 99.1

 

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Reliability Incorporated (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Larry Edwards, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 

 

/s/ Larry Edwards
#### Gloria M. Prince, Appellant, v. City of New York, Respondent.

Judgment in this personal injury negligence action, entered on June 27, 1963, pursuant to directed verdict for defendant at the end of the case, unanimously reversed and verdict vacated, on the law, and a new trial ordered, without costs to any party. On a motion by a defendant for a directed verdict, the facts adduced at trial must be considered in the light most favorable to plaintiff. Plaintiff testified that patches of lumpy ice had been on the sidewalk by the school for about a week during which there had been periods of thawing weather. She said she slipped on the lumpy patch after it had been lightly covered with fresh snow. These facts warrant submission of the case to the jury (see 27 N. Y. Jur., Highways, Streets, and Bridges, § 480). Although plaintiff’s case may be dubious, a verdict may not be directed since the standard is not whether a verdict on her behalf would be set aside as contrary to the weight of the credible evidence, but whether the jury could find for her by any rational process (see *Blum*v. *Fresh Grown Preserve Corp.,*292 N. Y. 241; 4 Weinstein-Korn-Miller, N. Y. Civ. Prac., pars. 4401.1A-4401.17). Concur—Botein, P. J., Breitel, McNally, Stevens and Eager, JJ.
1827.304-3 Subcontracts. ( a ) Unless otherwise authorized or directed by the contracting officer, contractors awarding subcontracts at any tier shall select and include in the subcontracts one of the clauses identified in subparagraphs (a)(1) or (2) of this section. At all tiers, the applicable clause identified below shall be modified to identify the parties as follows: references to the Government are not changed, and in all references to the Contractor the subcontractor is substituted for the Contractor so that the subcontractor has all rights and obligations of the Contractor in the clause. ( 1 ) The clause at 1852.227-70, New Technology—Other than a Small Business Firm or Nonprofit Organization, shall be used in any subcontract with other than a small business firm or a nonprofit organization if a purpose of the subcontract is the performance of experimental, developmental, research, design, or engineering work of any of the types described in 1827.303(d)(1).
( 2 ) The clause at FAR 52.227-11, Patent Rights—Ownership by the Contractor, modified by 1852.227-11 (see 1827.303(b)(1)), shall be used in any subcontract with a small business firm or a nonprofit organization if a purpose of the subcontract is the performance of experimental, developmental, or research work.
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



We hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Form 10-Q of Reliability Incorporated (the Issuer) for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2004 (the Periodic Report):



| | 1. | Fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                   |  |  |  |                                                     
|-------------------------------------------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|                                                   |  | 
|/s/    LARRY EDWARDS                               |  |  |  | /s/    CARL V. SCHMIDT                              
|                                                   |  |  |  |                                                     
|Larry Edwards Chief Executive Officer May 12, 2004 |  |  |  | Carl V. Schmidt Chief Financial Officer May 12, 2004
201.403 Individual deviations. ( 1 ) Individual deviations, except those described in 201.402(1) and paragraph (2) of this section, must be approved in accordance with the department/agency plan prescribed by 201.304(4).
( 2 ) Contracting officers outside the United States may deviate from prescribed nonstatutory FAR and DFARS clauses when— ( i ) Contracting for support services, supplies, or construction, with the governments of North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) countries or other allies (as described in 10 U.S.C. 2341(2)), or with United Nations or NATO organizations; and
( ii ) Such governments or organizations will not agree to the standard clauses.
[65 FR 6552, Feb. 10, 2000]
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 817 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the age requirement 

with respect to eligibility for qualified ABLE programs. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 4, 2017 

Mr. CASEY (for himself, Mr. BURR, and Mr. VAN HOLLEN) introduced the 

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase 

the age requirement with respect to eligibility for qualified ABLE programs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘ABLE Age Adjust5 ment Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. MODIFICATION OF AGE REQUIREMENT FOR QUALI7 FIED ABLE PROGRAMS. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 529A(e) of the Internal 

9 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ‘‘age 26’’ 


SSpencer on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 817 IS

1 each place it appears in paragraphs (1)(A) and 

2 (2)(A)(i)(II) and inserting ‘‘age 46’’. 

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

4 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

5 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS