alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### 1552.217-76 Option to extend the effective period of the contract—indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity contract.

As prescribed in 1517.208(g), the following is used in indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity type contracts with options to extend the effective period of the contract. The clause may be adjusted depending upon the number of options. If only one option period is used, modify (b) and (c) accordingly.

# Option To Extend the Effective Period of the Contract—Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity Contract (MAR 1984)

(a) The Government has the option to extend the effective period of this contract for ____ additional period(s). If more than sixty (60) days remain in the contract effective period, the Government, without prior written notification, may exercise this option by issuing a contract modification. To unilaterally exercise this option within the last 60 days of the effective period, the Government must issue written notification of its intent to exercise the option prior to that last 60-day period. This preliminary notification does not commit the Government to exercising the option.

(b) If the options are exercised, the “Minimum and Maximum Contract Amount” clause will be modified to reflect new and separate minimums of ____ for the first option period and ____ for the second option period, and new and separate maximums of ____ for the first option period and ____ for the second option period.

(c) The “Effective Period of the Contract” clause will be modified to cover a base period from ____________________ to __________________ and option periods from ____________________ to __________________ and ____________________ to ______________________.

(End of clause)

[49 FR 8867, Mar. 8, 1984, as amended at 82 FR 33021, July 19, 2017]
# Den Europæiske Unions C 345/2015

| | ISSN 1977-0871 |
| --- | --- |
| Den Europæiske Unions
  Tidende | C 345 |
| | |
| Dansk udgave | Meddelelser og oplysninger | 58. årgang18. oktober 2015 |

ISSN 1977-0871

Den Europæiske Unions

Tidende

C 345

Dansk udgave

Meddelelser og oplysninger

58. årgang18. oktober 2015

---

| Informationsnummer | Indhold | Side |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Oplysninger |
| | OPLYSNINGER FRA DEN EUROPÆISKE UNIONS INSTITUTIONER, ORGANER, KONTORER OG AGENTURER |
| | Rådet |
| 2015/C 345/01 | Rådets erklæring | 1 |

Informationsnummer

Indhold

Side

IV   Oplysninger

OPLYSNINGER FRA DEN EUROPÆISKE UNIONS INSTITUTIONER, ORGANER, KONTORER OG AGENTURER

Rådet

2015/C 345/01

Rådets erklæring

1

---

| DA | |
| --- | --- |

DA

---

IV Oplysninger

OPLYSNINGER FRA DEN EUROPÆISKE UNIONS INSTITUTIONER, ORGANER, KONTORER OG AGENTURER

Rådet

| 18.10.2015 | DA | Den Europæiske Unions Tidende | C 345/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.10.2015

DA

Den Europæiske Unions Tidende

C 345/1

---

RÅDETS ERKLÆRING

(2015/C 345/01)

Rådet noterer sig, at tilsagnet om at ophæve alle EU's atomrelaterede sanktioner i overensstemmelse med den fælles omfattende handlingsplan ikke berører den ordning til bilæggelse af tvister, der er nævnt i den fælles omfattende handlingsplan, eller genindførelsen af EU's sanktioner, såfremt Iran i væsentlig grad ikke overholder sine tilsagn i henhold til den fælles omfattende handlingsplan.

Rådet giver tilsagn om straks at genindføre alle EU's atomrelaterede sanktioner, der er blevet suspenderet og/eller ophævet, såfremt Iran i væsentlig grad ikke overholder sine tilsagn i henhold til den fælles omfattende handlingsplan, efter en fælles henstilling til Rådet fra Unionens højtstående repræsentant for udenrigsanliggender og sikkerhedspolitik, Frankrig, Tyskland og Det Forenede Kongerige.

---
217.202 Use of options. ( 1 ) See PGI 217.202 for guidance on the use of options. ( i ) See PGI 217.202(1) for guidance on the use of options with foreign military sales (FMS).
( ii ) See PGI 217.202(2) for the use options with sole source major systems for U.S. and U.S./FMS combined procurements.
( 2 ) For a contract that is initially awarded from the competitive selection of a proposal resulting from a broad agency announcement, see 234.005-1 for the use of contract options for the development and demonstration or initial production of technology developed under the contract or the delivery of initial or additional items.
[75 FR 32638, June 8, 2010, as amended at 81 FR 17045, Mar. 25, 2016, 84 FR 65307, Nov. 27, 2019; 87 FR 25145, Apr. 28, 2022]
#### 22.1002-1 General.

Service contracts over $2,500 shall contain mandatory provisions regarding minimum wages and fringe benefits, safe and sanitary working conditions, notification to employees of the minimum allowable compensation, and equivalent Federal employee classifications and wage rates. Under 41 U.S.C. 6707(d), service contracts may not exceed 5 years.

[54 FR 19816, May 8, 1989, as amended at 79 FR 24205, Apr. 29, 2014]
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

Laws & Guidance
                - Indirect Cost Concerns Under the Uniform Guidance  (MS PowerPoint, 606KB)
                - ED Indirect Cost Guidance
                   Printable view  Last Modified: 10/29/2015
                How Do I Find...- Student loans, forgiveness
- College accreditation
- Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
- FERPA
- FAFSA
- 1098, tax forms

More >
Information About...- Transforming Teaching
- Family and Community Engagement
- Early Learning

 
No Related Topics Found
                *Our mission* is to promote student achievement and preparation for global competitiveness by fostering educational excellence and ensuring equal access.
Student Loans
Repaying LoansDefaulted LoansLoan ForgivenessLoan Servicers
Grants & Programs
Apply for Pell GrantsGrants ForecastApply for a GrantEligibility for Grants
Laws & Guidance
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)FERPACivil RightsNew IDEA Website
Data & Research
Education StatisticsPostsecondary Education DataED Data ExpressNation's Report CardWhat Works Clearinghouse
About Us
Contact UsED OfficesJobsPress ReleasesFAQsRecursos en españolBudget, PerformancePrivacy ProgramSubscribe to E-Mail Updates- Notices
- FOIA
- Privacy Policy
- Accessibility
- Security
- Information quality
- Inspector General
- Whitehouse.gov
- USA.gov
- Benefits.gov
- Regulations.gov
Exhibit 32(a)

CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
FOR PPL CORPORATION'S 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2003

In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of PPL Corporation (the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Covered Report"), I, the principal executive officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify that:

| |  | The Covered Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and                   
| | - | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |   |                                                                                                                                                             
| |  | The information contained in the Covered Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





|Date:  March 1, 2004 | /s/ William F. HechtWilliam F. Hecht
Chairman, President and
Chief Executive Officer
PPL Corporation
|-------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Bryan W. Shaw, Ph.D., Chairman Carlos Rubinstein, Commissioner Toby Baker, Commissr'oner ZakCovar**~** Executir..'€Director 

## RECEIVED

- 6P'DL AIR PLANNING SEC. 

## 13 fEB -4 PH 5: 07
TEXAS COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY Protecting Texas by Redudng andPreventing Pollution January 28, 2013 Mr. Guy Donaldson Chief, Air Planning Section (6PD-L) 

### 91 7108 2133 3935 1971 0397 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region VI 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 1200 Dallas, TX 75202-2733 Subject: Negative Declaration ofthe Presence ofSewage Sludge Incineration (SSI) Units in Texas Dear Mr. Donaldson: The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ or commission), Air Permits Division,is submittinga negative declaration ofthe presence ofany existing SSI units for which construction commenced on or before October 14, 2010, in Texas. On Mareh 21, 2011, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) promulgated 

### Standards of PeiformanceforNew Stationary Sources andEmission Guidelines for Existing Sources: Sewage Sludge Incineration Units (76 FR 15372). Under this rule, new SSI units are subject to title 40 Code ofFederal Regulations, Part 60, Subpart LLLL and existing SSI units (those commencing construction on orbefore October 14, 2010) are subject to emission guidelines under Subpart MMMM. To develop this negative declaration, commission staffreviewed the most recent emissions inventory (2010) and new source review (NSR) andTitle V permits for sources in the relevant North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) codes (562213 and 221320). Facilities identified as falling under these NAICS codes in the emissions inventory were contacted and asked ifthey had SSI units. Similarly, all Texas NSR and Title V permits for facilities under these NAICS codes were reviewed to determine ifSSI units were present. In addition, staffreviewed the EPA's Inventory Database for the SSI Source Category (http://www.epa.gov/ttn/atwll2g/ssi/ssj inventozymemo.pdO. This review revealed no new units and one existing source with two SSI units operated by the City ofFort Worth {NSR Permit #7553). These SSI units have notbeen operated since August 5, 2010, and have been locked out and tagged outto prevent operation pursuantto Occupational Safety and Health Administration guidelines. On December 18, 2012, the City ofFortWorth filed a permit application with TCEQ to remove the SSI equipment and requirements from the permit. Therefore, there are no SSI units in Texas subjectto the emission guidelines. The TCEQ appreciates EPA's consideration onthis matter. Please contact Ms. Megan Hamilton (512-239- 1582) on my stafffor anyquestions you mayhave. Sincerely,

# A~Kdtd~**~ Mich~~**  P. Wilson, 

### P.E. Air Permits Division Director Office ofAir Texas Commission onEnvironmental Quality

CC: Mr. Jerry Pressley, City ofFort WorthVillage CreekWastewaterTreatment Plant MPW/mch/mcw P.O. Box 13087 • Austin, Texas 78711-3087 • 512·239-1000 • tceq.texas.gov How is our customer serviee? tceq.texas.govjcustomersurvey
EXHIBIT 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of Arbor EnTech Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended April 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Brad Houtkin, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   Date: July 28, 2009 /s/ Brad Houtkin Brad Houtkin Chief Financial Officer
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 84 

To provide for an exception to a limitation against appointment of persons 

as Secretary of Defense within seven years of relief from active duty 

as a regular commissioned officer of the Armed Forces. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 10, 2017 

Mr. MCCAIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To provide for an exception to a limitation against appointment of persons as Secretary of Defense within seven 

years of relief from active duty as a regular commissioned officer of the Armed Forces. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 84 IS

1 SECTION 1. EXCEPTION TO LIMITATION AGAINST APPOINT2 MENT OF PERSONS AS SECRETARY OF DE3 FENSE WITHIN SEVEN YEARS OF RELIEF 

4 FROM ACTIVE DUTY AS REGULAR COMMIS5 SIONED OFFICERS OF THE ARMED FORCES. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding the second sen7 tence of section 113(a) of title 10, United States Code, 

8 the first person appointed, by and with the advice and con9 sent of the Senate, as Secretary of Defense after the date 

10 of the enactment of this Act may be a person who is, on 

11 the date of appointment, within seven years after relief, 

12 but not within three years after relief, from active duty 

13 as a commissioned officer of a regular component of the 

14 Armed Forces. 

15 (b) LIMITED EXCEPTION.—This section applies only 

16 to the first person appointed as Secretary of Defense as 

17 described in subsection (a) after the date of the enactment 

18 of this Act, and to no other person. 

Æ 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 931 Reported in Senate (RS)]

<DOC>

                                                       Calendar No. 313
115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                 S. 931

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 4910 Brighton Boulevard in Denver, Colorado, as the ``George Sakato 
                             Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 25, 2017

Mr. Gardner (for himself and Mr. Bennet) introduced the following bill; 
which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

                           February 15, 2018

               Reported by Mr. Johnson, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 4910 Brighton Boulevard in Denver, Colorado, as the ``George Sakato 
                             Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. GEORGE SAKATO POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 4910 Brighton Boulevard in Denver, Colorado, shall be known 
and designated as the ``George Sakato Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``George 
Sakato Post Office''.
                                                       Calendar No. 313

115th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                 S. 931

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 4910 Brighton Boulevard in Denver, Colorado, as the ``George Sakato 
                             Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           February 15, 2018

                       Reported without amendment
```
## In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07 - 14 - 00436 - CR KENNETH ALLEN TARRIL LION, APPELLANT V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE On Appeal from the County Court at Law No . 2

Collin County, Texas Trial Court No. 002 - 82080 - 2014, Honorable Richard Davis , Presiding



### June 17 , 2015 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ. Appellant Kenneth Allen Tarrillion appeals from his jury conviction of the misdemeanor offense of assault causing bodily injury. 1 We dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 37.3(b). 2

1 See T EX . P ENAL C ODE A NN . § 22.01 (West 2013). 2 Rule 37.3(b) provides: “ If the trial court clerk failed to file the clerk's record because the appellant failed to pay or make arrangements to pay the clerk's fee for preparing the clerk's record, the appellate court may - on a party's motion or its own initiative - dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless the appellant was entitled to proc eed without payment of costs. The court must give the appellant a reasonable opportunity to cure before dismissal.”2

Appellant filed his notice of appeal i n November 2014. In December 2014, appellant’s retai ned counsel withdrew from the representation with the trial court’s approval. Appellant has appeared pro se since. The clerk’s record was due in mid - Decemb er 2014. The court clerk notified us appellant had not made paym ent arrangements for the record. Appellant did not correspond with th e Court, despite being notified of his obligation to make payment arrangements. In February 2015, we remanded the case to the trial court to determine whether appellant desired to prosecute his appeal and whether he was indigent and entitled to a free record. The trial court held a hearing in March 2015 , at which appellant personally appeared. The reporter’s record of that hearing shows appellant was aware of the cost of the appellate record. The trial court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law state that appellant is not indigent , and appellant’s statements to the trial court support that conclusion
. The case was reinstated in this Court following that hearing. By letter of May 19, we again ordered appellant to ma ke payment arrangements for the appellate record. On June 10, the Court received a status report stating appellant still has not made arrangements to pay for the clerk’s record
. Appellant has had ample opportunity to cure his failure to make payment arran gements for the clerk’s record. Because no clerk’s record has been filed due to appellant’s fault, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. T EX . R. A PP . P. 37.3(b). James T. Campbell Justice Do not publish.
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                               5
<CIK>                                   0000318835
<MULTIPLIER>                            1
<CURRENCY>                              U.S. Dollars

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       Dec-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                            Dec-31-1999
<CASH>                                  559869
<SECURITIES>                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                           0
<ALLOWANCES>                            0
<INVENTORY>                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        0
<PP&E>                                  10287266
<DEPRECIATION>                          7110979
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          3796535
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   0
<BONDS>                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                             0
<COMMON>                                0
<OTHER-SE>                              0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            3796535
<SALES>                                 2877374
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        2887720
<CGS>                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         1268246
<INCOME-TAX>                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     1268246
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                            1268246
<EPS-BASIC>                           0
<EPS-DILUTED>                           0


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM NUMEX CORPORATION-PRO FORMA CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF MARCH
31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<CIK> 0000318716
<NAME> NUMEX CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                             124
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      112
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   235
<PP&E>                                               9
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     252
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               66
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          1194
<OTHER-SE>                                      (1009)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       252
<SALES>                                             16
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                               11
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       11
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   454
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  11
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (443)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         1
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (445)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (445)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.04)


</TABLE>