alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: Carolyn Fast, Negotiator for Civil Rights Organizations and Consumer Advocates

To: Department of Education and Negotiated Rulemaking Committee 

Date: January 18, 2024

Re: Accreditation Proposal

NOTE: Text in red was proposed by the Department; text in red and highlighted in yellow is proposed by 

negotiators in a separate proposal; and the relevant language for this proposal appears highlighted in blue. 

§ 602.22 Substantive changes and other reporting requirements.

(a) 

(1) If the agency accredits institutions, it must maintain adequate written substantive change policies that 

ensure that any substantive change, as defined in this section, after the agency has accredited or 

preaccredited the institution does not adversely affect the capacity of the institution to continue to meet 

the agency's standards. The agency meets this requirement if—

* * *

(g) The agency must ensure that written arrangements approved under paragraph (a)(1)(M) include—

(1) An assessment of the numerical portion of the program included under the arrangement, including the 

extent to which the ineligible entity designs, administers, or instructs the course, to ensure the 

arrangement complies with regulatory limitations;

(2) An evaluation of the ineligible entity’s performance, including analysis of student achievement data, 

in providing similar programs with an institution, to assess the entity’s capability; and

(3) As appropriate, an evaluation of the ineligible entity’s recruitment and marketing practices to ensure 

they are compliant with the agency’s standards and an assurance that the institution supervises the entity’s 

marketing and recruiting efforts and approves promotional materials, communications with prospective 

and enrolled students, and training materials for recruitment staff.

(4) An assurance that the institution retains primary control over core program functions such as the 

provision of instruction, curriculum development, and the establishment of admissions standards and 

enrollment targets.

(hgh) The agency’s substantive change policy must define when the changes made or proposed by an 

institution are or would be sufficiently extensive to require the agency to conduct a new comprehensive 

evaluation of that institution.

Rationale: 

This proposal would add requirements for accreditor review of written arrangements with ineligible 

entities in order to ensure that institutions maintain supervision and control over core functions such as 

marketing and recruiting and setting admissions standards and enrollment targets. These requirements 

would address risks posed to students by the outsourcing of these core functions to ineligible entities, 
which in some cases have financial incentives to engage in conduct that is not in the best interests of 

students, such as: engaging in deceptive or abusive recruiting practices; promoting high-cost, low-value 

programs; lowering admissions standards; or enrolling students who do not meet admissions 

requirements.
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, R.V. Bailey, certify that:

1.      I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Aspen Exploration Corporation:

2.      Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.      Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.      The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

     b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

     c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     d) disclosed in this report any changes in the company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal control over financial reporting.

5.      The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

     a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

     b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.
215.209 Solicitation provisions and contract clauses. ( a ) For source selections when the procurement is $100 million or more, contracting officers should use the provision at FAR 52.215-1, Instructions to Offerors—Competitive Acquisition, with its Alternate I.
[76 FR 58152, Sept. 20, 2011]
#### In the Matter of James L. Coffin, an Attorney, Respondent. Committee on Professional Standards, Petitioner.

[832 NYS2d 463]—

Per Curiam.

Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court in 1991. He maintained an office for the practice of law in Maryland.

By order of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals filed February 22, 2007, respondent was disbarred in that jurisdiction upon his consent by affidavit *(Matter of Coffin,*917 A2d 672 [2007]). Petitioner moves for an order imposing reciprocal discipline pursuant to this Court’s rules *(see*22 NYCRR 806.19). Respondent did not timely reply to or otherwise appear in response to the motion.

Petitioner’s motion papers indicate that respondent has admitted his unlawful and unauthorized misappropriation of substantial assets of a Maryland trust while he served as the trust’s trustee.

Under the circumstances presented, we grant petitioner’s motion and further conclude that, in the interest of justice, respondent should be reciprocally disbarred.

Cardona, EJ., Mercure, Crew III, Peters and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that petitioner’s motion is granted; and it is further ordered that respondent is disbarred, and his name is stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law of the State of New York, effective immediately; and it is further ordered that respondent is commanded to desist and refrain from the practice of law in any form, either as principal or as agent, clerk or em*1077ployee of another; and respondent is hereby forbidden to appear as an attorney or counselor-at-law before any court, judge, justice, board, commission or other public authority, or to give to another an opinion as to the law or its application, or any advice in relation thereto; and it is further ordered that respondent shall comply with the provisions of this Court’s rules regulating the conduct of disbarred attorneys *(see 22*NYCRR 806.9).
EPA Registration Number

70506-4 vol. 2
1
2
3
 

4
5
 

 

6
 

 

7
 

 

 

8
 

 

9
10
11
12
13
14
 

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
 

22
23
24
25
26
 

 

27
28
 

 

29
30
31
Exhibit 32.1

** **

** **

**Certification of CEO andCFO**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350,**

**AsAdopted Pursuant to**

**Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

 

 

In connection with theAnnual Report on Form 10-K of Angeles Income Properties, Ltd. II (the"Partnership"), for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Steven D.Cordes, as the equivalent of the chief executive officer of the Partnership, andStephen B. Waters, as the equivalent of the chief financial officer of thePartnership, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to thebest of his knowledge:

 

(1)   The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)   Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

 

 

 

 

This certification isfurnished with this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Partnership for purposes of Section 18of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended.
Exhibit 32.1





Certification of CEO and CFO

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002







In connection with the Annual Report on

Form 10-KSB/A No. 1

 of National Property Investors 4 (the "Partnership"), for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Martha L. Long, as the equivalent of the Chief Executive Officer of the Partnership, and Stephen B. Waters, as the equivalent of the Chief Financial Officer of the Partnership, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.





| |                         
| | ------------------------
| | /s/Martha L. Long       
| | Name: Martha L. Long    
| | Date:

February 22, 2008
| |                         
| | /s/Stephen B. Waters    
| | Name: Stephen B. Waters 
| | Date:

February 22, 2008





This certification is furnished with this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Partnership for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
# September 2022 FOIA Log
#### Jean H. Zarrello, Respondent, v Carl A. Zarrello, Appellant.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered July 13, 1978, awarding plaintiff temporary alimony of $100 per week, unanimously affirmed, without costs or disbursements. Our affirmance should not be construed as any indication of our view as regards the amount of, or, indeed, the wife's entitlement to, permanent alimony, or even as to a motion for modification of temporary alimony due to substantial changed circumstances. The issue of permanent alimony should be fully explored at trial and determined in accordance with the statutory criteria (Domestic Relations Law, § 236). We remain of the view that a trial at the earliest possible date provides the forum most appropriate to a resolution of this type of dispute. ConcurLupiano, J. P., Silverman, Evans, Lynch and Sullivan, JJ.
#### John M. Keane et al., Respondents, v Sloan Kettering Institute for Cancer Research, et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

In a medical malpractice action, defendants Sloan Kettering Institute for Cancer Research and Memorial Hospital for Cancer and Allied Diseases appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Putnam County, dated April 18, 1978, which *902denied their motion to amend their answer to assert the affirmative defense of "charitable immunity.” Order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements, upon the opinion of Mr. Justice Rubenfeld. We add that reliance on earlier decisions has little place in the field of torts. Therefore, appellants cannot rationally argue that the hospital’s standard of care or scope of its insurance coverage was influenced by reliance on the belief that the concept of charitable immunity was to be continued (see *Dalton v St. Luke's Catholic Church,*27 NJ 22; *Cummings v Greenhouse,*77 Misc 2d 733; *Lawrence-Cedarhurst Bank v Ruth,*162 Misc 82). We particularly note and agree with Special Term’s comment that even prior to *Bing v Thunig*(2 NY2d 656) "The defense of charitable immunity had already been 'riddled with numerous exceptions and subjected to various qualifications and refinements’ in New York *(Bing v Thunig,*2 NY2d at p. 663) and 'the trend * * * throughout the country [had] more and more been away from nonliability’ *(id*at p. 665). There was, under these circumstances, no basis for any great reliance on a continuation of the prior rule.” Titone, J. P., O’Connor, Margett and Martuscello, JJ., concur.
Disclaimer

### State Department of Education

Ohio Department of Education25 South Front StreetColumbus, OH 43215-4183Toll-Free: (877) 644-6338Website: http://www.ode.state.oh.us/

### State Higher Education Agency

Ohio Board of Regents25 South Front StreetColumbus, OH 43215Phone: (614) 466-6000Fax: (614) 466-5866Website: https://www.ohiohighered.org/board

### Special Education Agency

Office for Exceptional ChildrenOhio Department of Education25 South Front Street, Mail Stop 409Columbus, OH 43215-4183Phone: (614) 466-2650Toll-Free: (877) 644-6338Fax: (614) 387-0968Website: http://education.ohio.gov/Topics/Special-Education

### State Adult Education Agency

Ohio Department of Higher ED Workforce Training and Adult Education 25 South Front St Columbus, OH 43215 Phone: (614) 466-6000 Fax: (614) 466-5866 Website: https://highered.ohio.gov/

Back to state map
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>

The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Winthrop
Residential Associates III, A Limited Partnership and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.

</LEGEND>

<MULTIPLIER>      1


<S>                                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                      12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                                JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                                  DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                                          2,683,000
<SECURITIES>                                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                           0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                            0
<INVENTORY>                                                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                        0
<PP&E>                                                          5,128,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                                 (3,073,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                  4,829,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                   0
<BONDS>                                                         2,475,000
<COMMON>                                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                                      1,564,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                    4,829,000
<SALES>                                                                 0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                2,446,000
<CGS>                                                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                     976,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                201,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                         0
<INCOME-TAX>                                                    1,271,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                             1,271,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                         0
<CHANGES>                                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                                    1,271,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                                         47.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                       47.03




</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION 

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY 

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

 Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Service Center 

FOIA APPEAL FORM 

Use this form to appeal the U.S. Department of Education's response to your initial request. Submit all documentation via email 

to EDFOIAManager@ed.gov; Fax 202-401-0920; or mail to U.S. Department of Education, Office of the Secretary, 400 

Maryland Avenue, SW, LBJ 7W106, Washington, DC 20202-0121, ATTN: FOIA Public Liaison. 

REQUESTER INFORMATION 

Title First Name M.I. Last Name 

Business Name Title 

Address Bldg/Apt# 

City State Zipcode 

Phone Number Fax Number Email 

APPEAL INFORMATION 

Reason for Appeal 

SUPPORTING INFORMATION 

Department Response Date Original Request Date Request Number (located on the Department's response letter) 

Supporting Documents 

Your appeal form should be accompanied with the following documents. 

1. Initial letter of request (if available electronically)

2. Denial letter

3. Any documentation that serves as evidence or supports the argument you wish the Department to consider in making an

administrative determination on your appeal.

ED-EMVF-003.2 ED 152; SORN 18-04-01 Page 1 of 2 
Privacy Act Statement: 

AUTHORITY: 5 U.S.C. 301, Departmental Regulations and 5 U.S.C. 552, Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). 

PURPOSE: to allow individuals to file electronic FOIA requests; to track all FOIA requests from receipt to response to compile statistics for the Annual FOIA Report; to 

research and respond to FOIA requests; to maintain case files to comply with records disposal requirements; and to maintain an administrative record to support any litigation. 

ROUTINE USE: Requests are received, assigned a case number, routed to the appropriate office or organization for research and response, and filed in a case file. Requests that 

are transferred, receive a no records response, or granted in full are retained for 2 years and then destroyed. Requests that are denied in whole or in part are retained for 6 years 

then destroyed. 

DISCLOSURE: Voluntary. We seek your full name and postal mailing address so we may mail a response to you. Failure to provide this information may result in your 

request not being processed (this page does not capture email addresses). 

Information collected by this form is also used for trend analysis and may be shared with law enforcement personnel. Information submitted may be retained indefinitely. 

ED-EMVF-003.2 ED 152; SORN 18-04-01 Page 2 of 2
- 1 - Alexander Van der Bellen Managing Director and

Associate General Counsel

Delta Air Lines, Inc.

1212 New York Avenue NW Washington, DC 20005

202.842.4184

sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com

March 24, 2010

via email and regulations.gov

Esta Rosenberg Chief, U.S. Air Carrier Licensing Division George Wellington Chief, Foreign Air Carrier Licensing Division Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE Washington, DC 20590

Re: Joint Application of Sociedad Aeronautica de Medellin Consolidada S.A. (SAM) and Delta Air Lines, Inc. for a Statement of Authorization and Related Exemption Authority

Dockets DOT-OST-2008-0143 and DOT-OST-2002-14057

Dear Ms. Rosenberg and Mr. Wellington:

This letter is to confirm that Delta has polled all carriers on the service list to the above referenced application filed on March 19, 2010 and there are no objections. In these circumstances, the Joint Applicants urge that the application be granted as soon as possible.

Respectfully submitted,

Alexander Van der Bellen

cc: Richard Mathias, Counsel for SAM David Endersbee, Counsel for SAM Brian Hedberg, DOT

Mike Orr, Airline Info
U.S. DISTRICT COURT FOR 1HE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

ATTORNEY APPEARANCE FORM 

NOTE: In order to appear before this Court an attorney must either be a member in good 

standing of this Court's general bar or be granted leave to appear pro hac vice as provided for 

by Local Rules 83.12 through 83.14. 

In the Matter of Case Number: 12-cv-3107 

VENTAS REALTY, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, 

V. 

ALC CVMA, LLC, ALC GGMC, LLC, ASSISTED LIVING 

CONCEPTS, INC., et al. 

AN APPEARANCE IS HEREBY FILED BY THE UNDERSIGNED AS ATTORNEY FOR: 

ALC CVMA, LLC; ALC GGMG, LLC; ALC HTIF, LLC; ALC PEDG, LLC; ALC TPCG, 

LLC; ALC TISSC, LLC; ALC TSKG, LLC; and ALC WRWG, LLC 

NAME (Type or print) 

John A. Rothstein 

SIGNATURE (Use electronic signature if the appearance form is filed electronically) 

s/ John A. Rothstein 

FIRM 

Quarles & Brady LLP 

STREET ADDRESS 

411 E. Wisconsin Ave., Suite 2350 

CITY/STATE/ZIP 

Milwaukee 

ID NUMBER (SEE ITEM 3 IN INSTRUCTIONS) 

ILND-GB-5737 

TELEPHONE NUMBER 

(414) 277-5351 

ARE YOU ACTING AS LEAD COUNSEL IN THIS CASE? YES I NO 

ARE YOU ACTING AS LOCAL COUNSEL IN THIS CASE? YES NO I 

ARE YOU A MEMBER OF THIS COURT'S TRIAL BAR? YES / NO 

IF THIS CASE REACHES TRIAL, WILL YOU ACT AS THE TRIAL ATTORNEY? YES I NO 

IF THIS IS A CRIMINAL CASE, CHECK THE BOX BELOW THAT DESCRIBES YOUR STATUS. 

RETAINED COUNSEL APPOINTED COUNSEL 

Case: 1:12-cv-03107 Document #: 33 Filed: 05/17/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:1249