alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
December 1, 2015

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

STEVE GRIFFITH, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY, DOUGLAS BRINKLEY, IN 

HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY, SCOTT SCHULTZ, IN HIS OFFICIAL

CAPACITY, AND MARK GROTHAUS, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY, 

Appellants

NO. 14-14-00900-CV V.

COLLISION CLINIC, L.L.C. AND HANNA “JOHN” ELIAS, Appellees

________________________________

This cause, an appeal from the “Order Denying Defendants’ Plea to 

Jurisdiction,” signed November 5, 2014, was heard on the transcript of the record. 

We have inspected the record and conclude the trial court lacks jurisdiction over 

appellees’ suit against appellants. We therefore order the “Order Denying 

Defendants’ Plea to Jurisdiction” of the court below REVERSED and RENDER

judgment dismissing the suit against Steve Griffith, in his Official Capacity, 

Douglas Brinkley, in his Official Capacity, Scott Schultz, in his Official Capacity, 

and Mark Grothaus, in his Official Capacity.

We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by 

appellees, Collision Clinic, L.L.C. and Hanna “John” Elias, jointly and severally.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 1998 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         249,299
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   96,322
<ALLOWANCES>                                    17,529
<INVENTORY>                                    205,377
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               558,601
<PP&E>                                       1,003,814
<DEPRECIATION>                                 758,580
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 803,835
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           67,626
<BONDS>                                        185,305
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  2,361,440
<COMMON>                                       969,834
<OTHER-SE>                                 (2,780,370)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   803,835
<SALES>                                      1,773,026
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,775,436
<CGS>                                        1,389,744
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  338,986
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 4,815
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,628
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 32,263
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,432
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    25,831
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
22.1309 Actions because of noncompliance. The contracting officer must take necessary action as soon as possible upon notification by the appropriate agency official to implement any sanctions imposed on a contractor by the Department of Labor for violations of the clause at 52.222-35, Equal Opportunity for Veterans. These sanctions (see 41 CFR 60-300.66) may include— ( a ) Withholding progress payments;
( b ) Termination or suspension of the contract; or
( c ) Debarment of the contractor.
[66 FR 53488, Oct. 22, 2001, as amended at 75 FR 60252, Sept. 29, 2010]
<PAGE>
                                                                 EXHIBIT (10)(a)

[SUTHERLAND ASBILL & BRENNAN LLP LETTERHEAD]


                   CONSENT OF SUTHERLAND ASBILL & BRENNAN LLP



    We hereby consent to the reference to our name under the caption "Legal
Matters" in the Prospectus filed as part of Post-Effective Amendment No. 16 to
Form N-4 (File No. 33-45379) for Merrill Lynch Life Variable Annuity Separate
Account B of Merrill Lynch Life Insurance Company. In giving this consent, we do
not admit that we are in the category of persons whose consent is required under
Section 7 of the Securities Act of 1933.


<TABLE>
<S>                             <C>  <C>
                                          SUTHERLAND ASBILL & BRENNAN LLP

                                               /s/ KIMBERLY J. SMITH
                                     -----------------------------------------
                                              Kimberly J. Smith, Esq.
</TABLE>

Washington, D.C.

April 24, 2000
#### 1842.7001 Denied access to NASA facilities.

The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 1852.242-72, Denied Access to NASA Facilities, in solicitations and contracts where contractor personnel will be working onsite at a NASA facility such as: NASA Headquarters and NASA Centers, including Component Facilities and Technical and Service Support Centers. For a list of NASA facilities see NPD 1000.3 “The NASA Organization”. The contracting officer shall not insert the clause where contractor personnel will be working onsite at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory including the Deep Space Network Communication Facilities (Goldstone, CA; Canberra, Australia; and Madrid, Spain).

[80 FR 52644, Sept. 1, 2015]
(April 26, 2007)

#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v George S. Crandall, Appellant.

[832 NYS2d 828]—

Crew III, J.P

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Hamilton County (Feldstein, J.), rendered January 4, 2006, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of reckless driving.

On May 19, 2004, defendant was found asleep in his car with the keys in the ignition. After awakening defendant, a Deputy Sheriff observed that his eyes were watery and bloodshot and that he slurred his speech when talking. Defendant thereafter was indicted on two misdemeanor counts of driving while intoxicated. Defendant ultimately entered a negotiated plea of guilty to reckless driving. Defendant now appeals contending that his guilty plea was improper because reckless driving is not a lesser included offense of driving while intoxicated.

Where an indictment charges two or more offenses in separate counts, a defendant may plead guilty to a lesser included offense of any of the charged offenses, with the permission of both the court and the People *(see*CPL 220.10 [4] [b]). While defendant is correct in his assertion that the plea entered here does not constitute a lesser included offense as defined by CPL 1.20 (37), such error is not jurisdictional in nature *(see People v Keizer,*100 NY2d 114, 118 [2003]; *People v Ford,*62 NY2d 275, 282-283 [1984]). Indeed, conviction of a different offense by plea will only be set aside on jurisdictional grounds if, insofar as is relevant to the instant appeal, “the offense of conviction is not transactionally related to the offense specified in the accusatory instrument” (Preiser, 2003 Supp Practice Commentaries, McKinney’s Cons Laws of NY, Book 11 A, CPL 220.20, 2007 Cum Pocket Part, at 80). Such clearly is not the case here. Moreover, Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1192 (10) (a) specifically provides for a plea other than to Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1192 (2), (3), (4) *1078or (4-a) where, as here, the prosecutor has determined that the charges laid are not warranted and the basis for the proposed disposition has been set forth on the record.

Peters, Mugglin, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


  

  Exhibit
   10(i)

  

 CONSENT OF
   INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’

  

 To the Board of
   Directors of

 Massachusetts Mutual
   Life Insurance Company

  

         We consent to the
   inclusion in this Post-Effective Amendment No. 19 to Registration Statement
   No. 2-75412 on Form N-4 of our reports dated February 1, 2000 on our audit
   of Variable Annuity Fund 4 and Flex Annuity IV (Qualified) Segments of
   Massachusetts Mutual Variable Annuity Separate Account 1, February 14, 2000
   on our audit of the Flex Annuity IV (Non-qualified) Segment of Massachusetts
   Mutual Variable Annuity Separate Account 2 as of December 31, 1999 and for
   the year then ended, and of our report dated February 1, 2000, on our audit
   of the statutory financial statements of Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance
   Company as of December 31, 1999 and for the year then ended, which includes
   explanatory paragraphs relating to the use of statutory accounting
   practices, which differ from generally accepted accounting principles. We
   also consent to the reference to our Firm under the caption
   “Experts” appearing in the Statement of Additional
   Information.

  

 DELOITTE
   
 & TOUCHE 
 LLP

  

 Hartford,
   Connecticut

 April 24,
   2000
**WITHDRAWN 01/29/15**

January 15, 2015

In accordance with the enclosed Memorandum Opinion, below is the judgment in the numbered cause set out herein to be entered in the Minutes of this Court as of the 15th day of January, 2015.

10-14-00327-CV	DEFENSE RESOURCE SERVICES, LLC v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF CENTRAL TEXAS - ON APPEAL FROM THE 170TH DISTRICT COURT OF McLENNAN COUNTY - TRIAL COURT NO. 2013-3668-4 - DISMISSED - Opinion by Justice Scoggins:

“This cause came on to be heard on the Court’s own motion to dismiss appeal, and the same being considered, because it is the opinion of the Court that said appeal should be dismissed; it is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that said appeal be, and hereby is, dismissed.  It is further ordered that Appellant Defense Resource Services, LLC pay all costs in this behalf expended and that this decision be certified below for observance.”

# image1.png
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 16 (Wednesday, January 27, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 7331-7332]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-01581]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 11312]


Designation of Niamat Hama Rahim Hama Sharif as a Specially 
Designated Global Terrorist

    Acting under the authority of and in accordance with section 
1(a)(ii)(B) of Executive Order 13224 of September 23, 2001, as amended 
by Executive Order 13268 of July 2, 2002, Executive Order 13284 of 
January 23, 2003, and Executive Order 13886 of September 9, 2019, I 
hereby determine that the person known as Niamat Hama Rahim Hama 
Sharif, also known as Saed Tawealy, also known as Sa'ad Tawela, is a 
foreign person who is a leader of al-Qa'ida Kurdish Battalions, a group 
whose property and interests in property are concurrently blocked 
pursuant to a determination by the Secretary of State pursuant to 
Executive Order 13224.
    Consistent with the determination in section 10 of Executive Order 
13224 that prior notice to persons determined to be subject to the 
Order who might have a constitutional presence in the United States 
would render ineffectual the blocking and other measures authorized in 
the Order because of the ability to transfer funds instantaneously, I

[[Page 7332]]

determine that no prior notice needs to be provided to any person 
subject to this determination who might have a constitutional presence 
in the United States, because to do so would render ineffectual the 
measures authorized in the Order.
    This notice shall be published in the Federal Register.

    Dated: January 6, 2021.
Zachary A. Parker,
Director, Office of Directives Management, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2021-01581 Filed 1-26-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-AD-P
<PAGE>

                                                                   April 5, 2000



PERSONAL & CONFIDENTIAL
-----------------------


Mr. John A. Pratt Jr.
Hudson Valley Bank
21 Scarsdale Road
Yonkers, New York 10707

Dear John:

I am writing this letter to confirm our understanding that you will continue to
act as a Consultant to the Bank through December 31, 2000, primarily in its
business Retention and Business Development programs.

     The plan is for you to make between 30 and 40 calls a month, which you will
schedule at your convenience.  These calls generally will fall into two
categories:  (1) present VIP customers, and (2) present Major Accounts who we
believe may become VIP's or who are fairly high income producers in the Major
category.  Follow-up on the Business Development Lists will be re-assigned to
others.

     We are hopeful that you can make many of these calls alone, but if you
believe others should accompany you, this will b e your call.  You should
prepare a monthly report, which will be directed, to me.

     You will be operating through me as the Chairman of the Board and I hope to
be providing you with updated lists each quarter.  The concentration this year
should again be on the VIP's and the very high Majors.
<PAGE>

Mr. John A. Pratt Jr.                  -2-                         April 5, 2000



     You will be paid a consulting fee of Fifty Thousand Dollars ($50,000) for
the year 2000, payable monthly at the beginning of the month at the rate of
$4,166.66.   A make-up for the first 4 months of this year will be issued
sometime this month.

     If this is your understanding, please sign the enclosed copy of this letter
where indicated and return to me.

                                        Regards,



                                        William E. Griffin
                                        Chairman of the Board


AGREED & ACCEPTED:


_______________________________
John A. Pratt Jr.


Dated:____________________ 2000


                                      -2-
Case: 1:12-cv-02515 Document #: 77 Filed: 07/03/14 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:552
Case: 1:12-cv-02515 Document #: 77 Filed: 07/03/14 Page 2 of 5 PageID #:553
Case: 1:12-cv-02515 Document #: 77 Filed: 07/03/14 Page 3 of 5 PageID #:554
Case: 1:12-cv-02515 Document #: 77 Filed: 07/03/14 Page 4 of 5 PageID #:555
Case: 1:12-cv-02515 Document #: 77 Filed: 07/03/14 Page 5 of 5 PageID #:556
VI 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 979 

For the relief of Arturo Hernandez-Garcia. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 27, 2017 

Mr. BENNET introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

For the relief of Arturo Hernandez-Garcia. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR ARTURO 

4 HERNANDEZ-GARCIA. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsections (a) 

6 and (b) of section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality 

7 Act (8 U.S.C. 1151), Arturo Hernandez-Garcia shall be 

8 eligible for issuance of an immigrant visa or for adjust9 ment of status to that of an alien lawfully admitted for 

10 permanent residence upon filing an application for 

11 issuance of an immigrant visa under section 204 of such 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 979 IS

1 Act (8 U.S.C. 1154) or for adjustment of status to lawful 

2 permanent resident. 

3 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Arturo Her4 nandez-Garcia enters the United States before the filing 

5 deadline specified in subsection (c), he shall be considered 

6 to have entered and remained lawfully and shall, if other7 wise eligible, be eligible for adjustment of status under 

8 section 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 

9 U.S.C. 1255) as of the date of the enactment of this Act. 

10 (c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF

11 FEES.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the ap12 plication for issuance of an immigrant visa or the applica13 tion for adjustment of status is filed with appropriate fees 

14 within 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

15 (d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBER.— 

16 Upon the granting of an immigrant visa or permanent res17 idence to Arturo Hernandez-Garcia, the Secretary of State 

18 shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, during the 

19 current or next following fiscal year, the total number of 

20 immigrant visas that are made available to natives of the 

21 country of the alien’s birth under section 203(a) of the 

22 Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1153(a)) or, 

23 if applicable, the total number of immigrant visas that are 

24 made available to natives of the country of the alien’s birth 

25 under section 202(e) of such Act (8 U.S.C. 1152(e)). 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 979 IS

1 (e) DENIAL OF PREFERENTIAL IMMIGRATION

2 TREATMENT FOR CERTAIN RELATIVES.—The natural 

3 parents, brothers, and sisters of Arturo Hernandez-Garcia 

4 shall not, by virtue of such relationship, be accorded any 

5 right, privilege, or status under the Immigration and Na6 tionality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.). 

Æ 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 18 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 18

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
 United States Code, of the final rule submitted by the Department of 
 the Interior relating to Non-Subsistence Take of Wildlife, and Public 
 Participation and Closure Procedures, on National Wildlife Refuges in 
                                Alaska.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 1, 2017

 Mr. Sullivan (for himself and Ms. Murkowski) introduced the following 
joint resolution; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                      Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
 United States Code, of the final rule submitted by the Department of 
 the Interior relating to Non-Subsistence Take of Wildlife, and Public 
 Participation and Closure Procedures, on National Wildlife Refuges in 
                                Alaska.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
final rule submitted by the Department of the Interior relating to Non-
Subsistence Take of Wildlife, and Public Participation and Closure 
Procedures, on National Wildlife Refuges in Alaska (81 Fed. Reg. 52248 
(August 5, 2016)), and such rule shall have no force or effect.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 938 Reported in Senate (RS)]

<DOC>

                                                       Calendar No. 235
115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 938

                          [Report No. 115-166]

To require notice of cost-free Federal procurement technical assistance 
     in connection with registration of small business concerns in 
                          procurement systems.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 25, 2017

 Mr. Peters (for himself, Ms. Collins, Mr. Carper, Mr. Reed, and Mrs. 
  McCaskill) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs

                            October 5, 2017

               Reported by Mr. Johnson, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require notice of cost-free Federal procurement technical assistance 
     in connection with registration of small business concerns in 
                          procurement systems.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Procurement Fraud Prevention Act''.

SEC. 2. NOTICE OF COST-FREE FEDERAL PROCUREMENT TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE IN 
              CONNECTION WITH REGISTRATION OF SMALL BUSINESS CONCERNS 
              IN PROCUREMENT SYSTEMS.

    The Administrator of General Services, in consultation with the 
Director of the Office of Management and Budget, shall establish 
procedures to ensure that any notice or direct communication regarding 
registration of a small business concern in a procurement system 
contains information about cost-free Federal procurement technical 
assistance services that are available through the Small Business 
Administration, Procurement Technical Assistance Centers of the Defense 
Logistics Agency, the Department of Commerce (including the Minority 
Business Development Agency), and other Federal agencies and programs.
                                                       Calendar No. 235

115th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                 S. 938

                          [Report No. 115-166]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

To require notice of cost-free Federal procurement technical assistance 
     in connection with registration of small business concerns in 
                          procurement systems.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            October 5, 2017

                       Reported without amendment
```
Order Form (01/2005)

United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois

Name of Assigned Judge

or Magistrate Judge

Ruben Castillo Sitting Judge if Other

than Assigned Judge

CASE NUMBER 12 C 1612 DATE 7/3/2013

CASE

TITLE

Gary Hanley vs. Fifth Third Bank

DOCKET ENTRY TEXT

Joint motion for extension of deadlines relating to approval of class action settlement [74] is granted. Enter

Order Amending Deadlines Relating to Approval of Class Action Settlement. Fairness hearing is reset to

12/23/2013 at 1:00 p.m. The motion hearing set for 7/10/2013 is vacated.

O [ For further detail see separate order(s).] Docketing to mail notices.

 Courtroom Deputy

Initials:

RO

12C1612 Gary Hanley vs. Fifth Third Bank Page 1 of 1

Case: 1:12-cv-01612 Document #: 76 Filed: 07/03/13 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:376
III 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 48 

Directing the Clerk of the House of Representatives to make corrections 

in the enrollment of H.R. 1551. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 25, 2018 

Mr. HATCH (for himself and Mr. WHITEHOUSE) submitted the following 

concurrent resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Directing the Clerk of the House of Representatives to make 

corrections in the enrollment of H.R. 1551. 

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives 

2 concurring), That, in the enrollment of the bill H.R. 1551, 

3 the Clerk of the House of Representatives shall make the 

4 following corrections: 

5 (1) Amend the long title so as to read: ‘‘An Act 

6 to modernize copyright law, and for other pur7 poses.’’. 

8 (2) In section 1(a), strike ‘‘Orrin G. Hatch’’ 

9 and insert ‘‘Orrin G. Hatch–Bob Goodlatte’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS