alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000016343
<NAME> CALIFORNIA JOCKEY CLUB AND BAY MEADOWS OPERATING COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                          10,365
<SECURITIES>                                     5,159
<RECEIVABLES>                                      999
<ALLOWANCES>                                        82
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                19,918
<PP&E>                                          35,898
<DEPRECIATION>                                  20,291
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  35,786
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           12,390
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                           116
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      23,353
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    35,786
<SALES>                                          1,749
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                30,198
<CGS>                                              580
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   28,235
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  15
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,948
<INCOME-TAX>                                        30
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,978
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,978
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .34
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .34
        

</TABLE>
Order entered October 14, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-01084-CV

DALLAS COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT D/B/A 

PARKLAND HEALTH AND HOSPITAL SYSTEM, Appellant

V.

LAURA CONSTANTINO, Appellee

On Appeal from the 162nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-12-02236-I

ORDER

We GRANT the parties’ October 11, 2013 joint motion for an extension of time to file 

appellee’s brief and appellant’s reply brief. Appellee shall file her brief on or before November 

1, 2013. Appellant shall file any reply brief on or before December 10, 2013. We caution the 

parties that no further extension of time will be granted in this accelerated appeal absent 

extraordinary circumstances.

/s/ DAVID LEWIS 

JUSTICE
#### CONNOR v. METROPOLITAN ST. RY. CO.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

October 23, 1903.)

Action by Raymond Connor, an infant, against the Metro-r politan Street Railway Company.

No opinion. Motion denied, with $10 costs.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 999 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 999

To amend the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act to permanently prohibit 
the conduct of offshore drilling on the outer Continental Shelf in the 
 Mid-Atlantic, South Atlantic, North Atlantic, and Straits of Florida 
                            planning areas.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 1, 2017

Mr. Menendez (for himself, Mr. Markey, Ms. Warren, Mr. Whitehouse, Mr. 
Booker, Mr. Reed, Mr. Nelson, Mr. Merkley, Mr. Schatz, Mr. Cardin, Mrs. 
 Gillibrand, Mr. Van Hollen, Mr. Blumenthal, Mr. Sanders, Ms. Hassan, 
and Mrs. Feinstein) introduced the following bill; which was read twice 
     and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act to permanently prohibit 
the conduct of offshore drilling on the outer Continental Shelf in the 
 Mid-Atlantic, South Atlantic, North Atlantic, and Straits of Florida 
                            planning areas.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Clean Ocean And Safe Tourism Anti-
Drilling Act'' or the ``COAST Anti-Drilling Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION OF OIL AND GAS LEASING IN CERTAIN AREAS OF THE 
              OUTER CONTINENTAL SHELF.

    Section 8 of the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (43 U.S.C. 1337) 
is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(q) Prohibition of Oil and Gas Leasing in Certain Areas of the 
Outer Continental Shelf.--Notwithstanding any other provision of this 
section or any other law, the Secretary of the Interior shall not issue 
a lease or any other authorization for the exploration, development, or 
production of oil, natural gas, or any other mineral in--
            ``(1) the Mid-Atlantic planning area;
            ``(2) the South Atlantic planning area;
            ``(3) the North Atlantic planning area; or
            ``(4) the Straits of Florida planning area.''.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Oswaldo Nieves

Plaintiff 

v.

Jesus Alcantar, et al.

Defendant(s)

)

)

) Case No. 12 C 3267

)

) Magistrate Judge Sheila Finnegan

)

)

ORDER

Pursuant to the stipulation of dismissal [105] filed by the parties, this case is hereby dismissed 

in its entirety without prejudice and with no award of attorneys' fees or costs to any party. By 

consent of the parties, the Court shall retain jurisdiction for the purpose of enforcing the terms 

of the settlement agreement. In the event a motion to enforce settlement is not filed on or 

before 6/15/2015, the Court shall relinquish jurisdiction and the case shall be deemed 

dismissed with prejudice without further order of the Court. Civil case terminated. 

 

Date: April 15, 2014 Magistrate Judge Sheila Finnegan

(0:00)

Rev. 10/2013

Case: 1:12-cv-03267 Document #: 107 Filed: 04/15/14 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:603
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Thomas Kennebrew, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Kings County, rendered January 19, I960, upon a jury’s verdict, convicting him of assault in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to serve a term of 5 to 10 years. Judgment affirmed. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Beldoek, Kleinfeld, Christ and Pette, JJ., concur.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined 

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R.

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 96-60842

Conference Calendar

__________________

WILLIAM J. COCKRELL;

BILLY H. COCKRELL;

CAROLYN V. COCKRELL,

 Plaintiffs-Appellants,

versus

MEMPHIS SHELBY COUNTY AIRPORT AUTHORITY, ET AL.,

 Defendants,

MEMPHIS SHELBY COUNTY AIRPORT AUTHORITY,

 Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 2:95-CV-16-B-B

- - - - - - - - - -

August 18, 1997

Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The appellants appeal the district court’s dismissal of

their civil rights action for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction

pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1). Because their brief fails

to address the basis for the district court’s dismissal, their
No. 96-60842

-2-

appeal is dismissed as frivolous. See Howard v. King, 707 F.2d

215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983); see 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

APPEAL DISMISSED.
N OTE : This order is nonprecedential

. 

# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________ ILLINOIS TOOL WORKS, INC., Appellant

v.

TERMAX COMPANY, Cross

- Appellant

______________________

2023

- 1252, 2023

- 1254

______________________ Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2021

- 00724.

______________________
ON MOTION

______________________
Before D YK , R EYNA , and C HEN , Circuit Judges

. D YK , Circuit Judge

. O R D E R

Illinois Tool Works

, Inc. moves to voluntarily dismiss its appeal, No. 2023

- 1252, and to dismiss Termax Company ’s cross

- appeal , No. 2023

- 1254 . Termax opposes dismissal of its cross

- appeal . We grant both motions. Case: 23-1252 Document: 30 Page: 1 Filed: 03/08/2023ILLINOIS TOOL WORKS , INC

. v. TERMAX CO

. 2

Termax appeals from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board’s final written decision in this inter partes review

, which agreed with Termax that all challenged claims of Illinois Tool Works’ U.S. Pa tent No. 10,683,882 are unpatentable. We have employed the familiar rule that “the prevailing party in a lower tribunal cannot ordinarily seek relief in the appellate court” to appeals from the Board. SkyHawke Techs., LLC v. Deca Int’l Corp. , 828 F.3d 13 73, 1375 (Fed. Cir. 2016) (citation omitted). We see nothing that warrants depart ing from that rule here.
In opposing dismissal, Termax contends that the Board erred in its construction of certain claim limitations that have also been incorporated into Il linois Tool Works’ new patent

. Termax hopes that a favorable decision on its claim construction arguments here will collaterally estop Illinois Tool Works from asserti ng those newly issued claims. But i n SkyHawke , we rejected a similar attempt to appeal from a Board’s claim construction when the appellant did “not seek to alter the judgment of the Board.” Id

. There, as here, Termax “is merely trying to preempt an unfavorable outcome” as to some other potential proceeding regarding Ill inois Tool Works’ new patent “that may or may not arise in the future ,” and

, if such an outcome does arise, Termax may appeal “at that time.” Id. at 1377. Accordingly,

I T I S O RDERED T HAT : (1) The motions are granted, and the appeals are dismissed. Case: 23-1252 Document: 30 Page: 2 Filed: 03/08/2023ILLINOIS TOOL WORKS , INC

. v. TERMAX CO

. 3

(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.

March 8

, 2023 Date F OR THE C OURT

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

ISSUED AS A MANDAT E (as to Appeal No. 2023

- 1252 only) : M arch 8, 2023 Case: 23-1252 Document: 30 Page: 3 Filed: 03/08/2023
#### 205.205-71 Only one responsible source.

Follow the procedures at PGI 206.302-1(d) prior to soliciting a proposal without providing for full and open competition under the authority at FAR 6.302-1.

[80 FR 21657, Apr. 20, 2015]
#### Junius J. Mills et al. v. Steinboro Lumber Corp. et al.

Motion to dismiss appeal dismissed, with $10 costs. Concur — Rabin, J. P., Valente, McNally, Stevens and Eager, JJ.
#### Harry G. Olson, Appellant, v. Ramona M. Olson, Respondent.

Amended decree and judgment insofar as appealed from unanimously affirmed, with costs. (Appeal from certain parts of an amended decree and judgment of Monroe Equity Term awarding alimony, both temporary and permanent, and counsel fees to the defendant.) Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Goldman, Halpern and McClusky, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 9 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. CON. RES. 9

   Recognizing the George C. Marshall Museum and George C. Marshall 
  Research Library in Lexington, Virginia, as the National George C. 
                      Marshall Museum and Library.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 15, 2017

    Mr. Kaine (for himself and Mr. Warner) submitted the following 
 concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Energy 
                         and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
   Recognizing the George C. Marshall Museum and George C. Marshall 
  Research Library in Lexington, Virginia, as the National George C. 
                      Marshall Museum and Library.

Whereas General George C. Marshall served as Army Chief of Staff during World 
        War II, Special Ambassador to China, Secretary of State, and Secretary 
        of Defense;
Whereas General George C. Marshall was promoted to General of the Army in 1944, 
        one of only five Army five-star generals in the history of the United 
        States;
Whereas General George C. Marshall was awarded the Congressional Gold Medal in 
        1946 for his military strategy and vital role during World War II;
Whereas General George C. Marshall was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 1953 for 
        developing the European economic recovery strategy known as the Marshall 
        Plan;
Whereas the George C. Marshall Foundation was established in 1953 and is devoted 
        to preserving the legacy of General George C. Marshall through 
        educational scholarship programs and facilities;
Whereas the George C. Marshall Foundation opened the George C. Marshall Museum 
        and George C. Marshall Research Library in 1964 in Lexington, Virginia, 
        on the post of the Virginia Military Institute, which is the alma mater 
        of General George C. Marshall;
Whereas the George C. Marshall Museum educates the public about the military and 
        diplomatic contributions of General George C. Marshall through extensive 
        exhibits; and
Whereas the George C. Marshall Research Library maintains the most comprehensive 
        collection of records documenting the life and leadership of General 
        George C. Marshall: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That Congress recognizes the George C. Marshall Museum and George C. 
Marshall Research Library in Lexington, Virginia, as the National 
George C. Marshall Museum and Library.
                                 <all>
```
We Care! pick up the wh Suicide "
e Care: ick up the phone . PZ

if you are experiencing an - Prevention -—
We Want To Help! emotional crisis and need

to talk to a trained VA
We Can Help! professional.
_< WETERANS,

») a Ww W You'll be immediately

connected with a

qualified caring KNOW THE
provider who can help.
WARNING
SIGNS
VETERANS: OF SUICIDE

Call the National Suicide toll-free
hot-line number

/
WA

\ >

Call the National Suicide toll-free
hot-line number

1-800-273-TALK (8255) 1-800-273-TALK (8255)
IB 10-206 P96218 WA Department of

1-800-273-TALK (8255)

SEPT 2007 Veterans Affairs


Did you know... Returning
veterans may be ata
higher risk of suicide?

All veterans
including you are
our #1 priority !

VA
Cares About You.

Call

1-800-273-TALK (8255)

Recognize the Suicide
Warning Signs
«Thinking about hurting or killing
yourself

+ Looking for ways to kill yourself

«Talking about death, dying or
suicide

+ Self-destructive behavior such
as drug abuse, weapons, etc.

The presence of
these signs requires
immediate attention.

Don’t wait

Call
1-800-273-TALK (8255)

Immediately!

Additional warning
signs may include

+ Hopelessness, feeling like there’s

no way out

- Anxiety, agitation, sleeplessness,

mood swings

+ Feeling like there is no reason to

live

« Rage or anger
+ Engaging in risky activities

without thinking

«Increasing alcohol or drug abuse
«Withdrawing from family and

friends

Call us if you
experience any of these
warning signs.

Don’t delay

Call

1-800-273-TALK (8255)
22.1705 Solicitation provision and contract clause. ( a ) ( 1 ) Insert the clause at 52.222-50, Combating Trafficking in Persons, in all solicitations and contracts.
( 2 ) Use the clause with its Alternate I when the contract will be performed outside the United States (as defined at 22.1702) and the contracting officer has been notified of specific U.S. directives or notices regarding combating trafficking in persons (such as general orders or military listings of “off-limits” local establishments) that apply to contractor employees at the contract place of performance.
( b ) Insert the provision at 52.222-56, Certification Regarding Trafficking in Persons Compliance Plan, in solicitations if— ( 1 ) It is possible that at least $550,000 of the value of the contract may be performed outside the United States; and
( 2 ) The acquisition is not entirely for commercially available off-the-shelf items.
[80 FR 4987, Jan. 29, 2015, as amended at 85 FR 62489, Oct. 2, 2020]
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 13 (Friday, January 22, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 6643-6644]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-01365]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[ER-FRL-9054-9]


Environmental Impact Statements; Notice of Availability

    Responsible Agency: Office of Federal Activities, General 
Information 202-564-5632 or https://www.epa.gov/nepa.

Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact Statements (EIS)
Filed January 11, 2021 10 a.m. EST Through January 14, 2021 10 a.m. EST
Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.

Notice Section 309(a) of the Clean Air Act requires that EPA make 
public its comments on EISs issued by other Federal agencies. EPA's 
comment letters on EISs are available at: https://cdxnodengn.epa.gov/cdx-enepa-public/action/eis/search.

EIS No. 20210006, Final Supplement, NRCS, MO, East Locust Creek 
Watershed Revised Plan, Review Period Ends: 02/22/2021, Contact: Chris 
Hamilton 573-876-0901.
EIS No. 20210007, Draft, USFS, DC, 36 CFR 228, Subpart A, Locatable 
Minerals, Comment Period Ends: 03/22/2021, Contact: Michael Fracasso 
303-241-3330.
EIS No. 20210008, Final, BLM, CA, Crimson Solar Project Final 
Environmental Impact Statement and Proposed Land Use Amendment to the 
California Desert Conservation Area Plan, Review Period Ends: 02/22/
2021, Contact: Miriam Liberatore 541-618-2200.
EIS No. 20210009, Final, FTA, PA, King of Prussia Rail Extension 
Project, Contact: Tim Lidiak 215-656-7084.

    Under 23 U.S.C. 139(n)(2), FTA has issued a single FEIS and ROD. 
Therefore, the 30-day wait/review period under NEPA does not apply to 
this action.

EIS No. 20210010, Draft, FRA, MD, Draft Environmental Impact Statement 
and Draft Section 4(f) Evaluation Baltimore-Washington Superconducting 
MAGLEV Project, Comment Period Ends: 04/22/2021, Contact: Brandon 
Bratcher 202-493-0844.

Amended Notice

EIS No. 20200215, Draft, USFS, OR, Stella Restoration Project, Comment 
Period Ends: 01/12/2021, Contact: Elizabeth Bly 541-560-3465.

    Revision to FR Notice Published 10/30/2020; Correction to Comment 
Period Due Date from December 14, 2020 to January 12, 2021.

EIS No. 20200238, Draft, USFS, OR, VOID--Stella Restoration Project,

[[Page 6644]]

Comment Period Ends: 01/12/2021, Contact: Elizabeth Bly 541-560-3465.

    Revision to FR Notice Published 11/27/2020; Retracted due to 
erroneous filing.

    Dated: January 15, 2021.
Cindy S. Barger,
Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal Activities.
[FR Doc. 2021-01365 Filed 1-21-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
#### In the Matter of 1466 Realty Co., Respondent, v. Hortense W. Gabel, as City Rent and Rehabilitation Administrator, Appellant. In the Matter of 1455 Realty Co., Respondent, v. Hortense W. Gabel, as City Rent and Rehabilitation Administrator, Appellant.

Judgments entered November 29, 1963, which annulled the orders of the City Rent and Rehabilitation Administrator which denied petitioners’ applications for rent increases, unanimously reversed, on the law and on the facts and in the exercise of discretion permission granted to the petitioners to convert their separate applications into a single application and upon such conversion the matter remanded to the Administrator for reconsideration, without costs. The two petitioner partnerships are owned by the same interests. The applications for rent increases relate to two separate buildings —1455 49th Street and 1466 49th Street. The buildings face each other on the same street and are substantially similar. The buildings were purchased in an arm’s length transaction as a package deal on January 5, 1962 for $820,000. The purchase price was allocated by the purchasers to the separate buildings in the sum of $440,000 for 1455 49th Street and the sum of $380,000 for 1466 49th Street. These allocations were approximately in proportion to the assessed valuations of the two buildings. The Administrator has fixed the assessed valuation of the buildings as the base for any application for rent increases. In *Matter of Perlman*v. *Herman*(13 A D 2d 55) this court rejected the use of an allocated purchase price arising out of a “package deal” purchase. Although the facts in the *Perlman*case were not as favorable to the owners as in the case involved here, the court indicated that even if the allocation were a fair one, it must nonetheless be demonstrated that the purchase price was unaffected by reason of the “ package deal ”. The Administrator could properly have found that there was no such demonstration here. While we conclude that the Administrator’s determination — passing upon the two separate applications — should be sustained, it would appear that the interests of justice may be better served if the petitioners were permitted to file a single application treating the properties as a single entity. Of course, upon the reconsideration of such application, the Administrator would be obliged to take into account all the appropriate factors necessary to determine whether in fact these buildings share such a unity of operation as to warrant a conclusion that they are operated as a single property. Settle order on notice. Concur — McNally, J. P., Stevens, Eager, Steuer and Staley, JJ.