alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### 1804.470-1 Scope.

This section implements NASA's acquisition requirements pertaining to Federal policies for the security of unclassified information and information systems. Federal policies include the Federal Information System Management Act (FISMA) of 2002, Homeland Security Presidential Directive (HSPD) 12, Clinger-Cohen Act of 1996 (40 U.S.C. 1401 *et seq.*), OMB Circular A-130, Management of Federal Information Resources, and the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) security requirements and standards. These requirements safeguard IT services provided to NASA such as the management, operation, maintenance, development, and administration of hardware, software, firmware, computer systems, networks, and telecommunications systems.

[72 FR 26561, May 10, 2007]
<PAGE>

DELOITTE &
   TOUCHE
----------------

                                            ------------------------------------
                                Deloitte & Touche LLP   Telephone (714) 436-71
                                Suite 1200              Facsimile (714) 436-72
                                695 Town Center Drive
                                Costa Mesa. California 92626-1924


December 23, 1998


Securities end Exchange Commission
Mail Stop 9-5
450 5th Street, N.W.
Washington, DC- 20549


Ladies and Gentlemen:

We have read and agree with the comments in Item 4 of Form 8-K of Spectrum
Laboratories, Inc., dated December 17, 1998.

Yours truly,

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP



----------------
DELOITTE TOUCHE
TOHMATSU
----------------
<TABLE>

<CAPTION>
                                                                  EXHIBIT 12

      THE BURLINGTON NORTHERN AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
              COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                     (IN MILLIONS, EXCEPT RATIO AMOUNTS)
                                 (UNAUDITED)

                                                 Six Months
                                               Ended June 30,
                                                1997    1996
                                              -------  -------
Earnings:
<S>                                           <C>      <C>
  Pre-tax income                              $   728  $   752
                             
  Add:
    Interest and fixed charges,
      excluding capitalized interest               54       45

    Portion of rent under long-term
      operating leases representative
      of an interest factor                       106       99

    Amortization of capitalized interest            2        1

  Less:  Undistributed equity in earnings
           of investments accounted for
           under the equity method                 11        6
                                              -------  -------


  Total earnings available for fixed charges  $   879  $   891
                                              =======  =======

Fixed charges:

  Interest and fixed charges                  $    62  $    52

  Portion of rent under long-term operating
    leases representative of an interest
    factor                                        106       99
                                              -------  -------

  Total fixed charges                         $   168  $   151
                                              =======  =======

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges              5.23x    5.90x

</TABLE>
#### Maggiolo Corporation, Respondent, v. S. J. M. General Contractors, Inc., et al., Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs. Sappah Shovel Service, Inc., Third-Party Defendant. S. J. M. General Contractors, Inc., et al., Interpleading Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Sappah Shovel Service, Inc., Interpleaded Defendant-Respondent.

In an action to recover a balance due for work, labor and services performed by plaintiff for the original defendants, and upon an alleged account stated between them, in which said defendants, pursuant to section 285 of the Civil Practice Act, set forth in their answer an interpleader complaint against Sappah Shovel Service, Inc., as a claimant for recovery of the reasonable value of the identical work, labor and services, the original defendants appeal, as limited by their brief: (1) from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County, dated July 19, 1962, as granted said interpleaded defendant’s motion to dismiss the interpleader complaint pursuant to subdivision 6 of said section 285; and (2) from an order of said court, dated December 10, 1962, which granted plaintiff’s motion for a preference in trial of the action, pursuant to rule 151 of the Rules of Civil Practice. Order of December 10, 1962, affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Order of July 19, 1962, insofar as appealed from, reversed, without costs; and motion to dismiss the interpleader complaint denied. In our opinion the interpleader complaint should not have been dismissed. Defendants have sufficiently demonstrated that they are exposed to double or multiple liability as a result of adverse claims. It is of no moment that these claims may not be mutually exclusive and that the defendants deny liability. Our present interpleader procedure (Civ. Prae. Act, § 285, subds. 5, 6) permits the stakeholder to deny liability and also permits of inconsistent claims, not mutually exclusive *{Nelson*v. *Cross & Brown Co.,*9 A D 2d 140; Twentieth Annual Report of N. Y. Judicial Council, 1954, pp. 276-277). Ughetta, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld, Brennan, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
14.204 Records of invitations for bids and records of bids. ( a ) Each contracting office shall retain a record of each invitation that it issues and each abstract or record of bids. Contracting officers shall review and utilize the information available in connection with subsequent acquisitions of the same or similar items.
( b ) The file for each invitation shall show the distribution that was made and the date the invitation was issued. The names and addresses of prospective bidders who requested the invitation and were not included on the original solicitation list shall be added to the list and made a part of the record.
#### Edward Kavazanjian, Appellant, v. Brookhattan Trucking Co., Defendant, and Bowne-Morton Stores, Inc., Respondent.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated September 16, 1960, denying his motion to amend the complaint and the bill of particulars so as to set forth an additional specification of negligence. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Beldock, Acting P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Pette, JJ., concur.
##### 



Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the amendment to the annual report of American Building
Control, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31,
2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof,
I, Bryan C.W. Tate, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(a)  This Form 10-K/A fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(b)  The information contained in this Form 10-K/A fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

|                                                                          | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|/s/ BRYAN C.W. TATE

Bryan C.W. Tate
Chief Executive Officer
May 14, 2003 |
```

                                                                EXHIBIT 3(ii)(2)

                            UNANIMOUS WRITTEN CONSENT

                           OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTRORS

                                       OF

                            TOMAHAWK INDUSTRIES, INC.

         The undersigned, being all of the directors of Tomahawk Industries,
Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Corporation"), hereby adopt the following
resolution as the action of the Board of Directors:

         RESOLVED, that Section 1 of Article III of the by-laws of the
Corporation is hereby deleted in its entirety and the following new Section 1 is
hereby substituted therefore:

         SECTION 1. NUMBER AND TERM.-The number of directors shall be between
two (2) and nine (9). The number of directors shall be fixed by the Board of
Directors from time to time; provided however, that any reduction in the number
of directors shall not end the term of any director then in office. The
directors shall be elected at the annual meeting of the stockholders and each
director shall be elected to serve until his successor shall be elected and
shall qualify. A director need not be a stockholder.

         RESOLVED, that Sandra L. Ahman be appointed to serve on the Board of
Directors, effective as of June 1, 2004.

Dated:  as of June 1, 2004

BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS:

/s/ Anthony Havens
------------------------
Anthony Havens, Director
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>    5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             APR-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                  OCT-31-1998
<CASH>                            202,751
<SECURITIES>                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                   1,047,145 
<ALLOWANCES>                      360,709
<INVENTORY>                     1,905,824
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                3,013,396
<PP&E>                          1,877,198
<DEPRECIATION>                  1,018,756
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  9,836,345
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           2,784,315
<BONDS>                                 0
<COMMON>                           99,499
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                       100,000
<OTHER-SE>                      6,852,531
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    9,836,345     
<SALES>                         2,227,450
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                2,227,450
<CGS>                           1,439,461
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   2,665,911
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                   19,403
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 50,975
<INCOME-PRETAX>                    82,073
<INCOME-TAX>                       34,471
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                 47,602 
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                       47,602
<EPS-PRIMARY>                         .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                         .01
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.1

                               HCC INDUSTRIES INC.
                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                                 (IN THOUSANDS)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                                    FOR THE YEAR ENDED
                                                                     ----------------------------------------------
                                                                      APRIL 1,          APRIL 3,          MARCH 28,
                                                                       2000              1999               1998
                                                                     ---------        -----------        ----------
<S>                                                                  <C>              <C>                <C>
Earnings:
     Earnings (loss) before taxes and extraordinary item             $  (3,859)       $     8,692        $    6,020
     Add:  Fixed charges(1)                                             11,333             11,190            10,327
                                                                     ---------        -----------        ----------

                                                                     $   7,474        $    19,882        $   16,347
                                                                     =========        ===========        ==========
Fixed Charges: (1)

     Interest expense                                                $  11,333        $    11,190        $   10,327
                                                                     =========        ===========        ==========
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges                                      --- (2)               1.8               1.6
                                                                     =======          ===========        ===========

</TABLE>

(1)  The ratios of earnings to fixed charges were computed by adding earnings
     before income taxes and extraordinary item to fixed charges and dividing by
     fixed charges. Fixed charges consist of interest expense and amortization
     of debt issuance costs.


(2)  The Company's earnings were insufficient to cover fixed charges for the
     fiscal year ended April 1, 2000. The dollar amount of the deficiency was
     $3,859,000.
### Stream monitoring and educational program in the Red River Basin, Texas, 1996-97

By: Stanley BaldysD. Grant Phillips

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/fs17097

#### Links

- More information:  **Publisher Index Page**                            (html)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

This fact sheet presents the 1996–97 stream monitoring and outreach activities of the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), the Red River Authority of Texas, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, the City of Wichita Falls, the Wichita County Water Improvement District No. 2, and the Texas Water Development Board. The fact sheet was prepared by the USGS in cooperation with the Red River Authority of Texas.
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Kevan B. Hensman, certify that:

1.      I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Aspen Exploration Corporation:

2.      Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.      Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.      The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

     b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

     c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     d) disclosed in this report any changes in the company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal control over financial reporting.

5.      The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

     a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

     b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.
#### 14.203-2 Dissemination of information concerning invitations for bids.

Procedures concerning display of invitations for bids in a public place, information releases to newspapers and trade journals, paid advertisements, and synopsizing through the Governmentwide point of entry (GPE) are set forth in 5.101 and Subpart 5.2.

[66 FR 27413, May 16, 2001, as amended at 71 FR 20300, Apr. 19, 2006]
- 1 - 

Alexander Van der Bellen 

Managing Director and 

Associate General Counsel 

Delta Air Lines, Inc. 

1212 New York Avenue NW 

Washington, DC 20005 

202.842.4184 

sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com 

March 24, 2010 

via email and regulations.gov 

Esta Rosenberg 

Chief, U.S. Air Carrier Licensing Division 

George Wellington 

Chief, Foreign Air Carrier Licensing Division 

Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Re: Joint Application of Sociedad Aeronautica de Medellin Consolidada S.A. (SAM) 

 and Delta Air Lines, Inc. 

 for a Statement of Authorization and Related Exemption Authority 

 Dockets DOT-OST-2008-0143 and DOT-OST-2002-14057 

 

Dear Ms. Rosenberg and Mr. Wellington: 

This letter is to confirm that Delta has polled all carriers on the service list to the above 

referenced application filed on March 19, 2010 and there are no objections. In these 

circumstances, the Joint Applicants urge that the application be granted as soon as possible. 

 

 

Respectfully submitted, 

Alexander Van der Bellen 

cc: Richard Mathias, Counsel for SAM 

 David Endersbee, Counsel for SAM 

 Brian Hedberg, DOT 

 Mike Orr, Airline Info
#### Cyd Woolf, as Executrix of Stanley Woolf, Deceased, v. R. T. Reed, as President of American Express Company.

Motion for reargument denied, with $10 costs. Concur—■ Rabin, J. P., Valente, McNally, Stevens and Steuer, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 12 (Thursday, January 21, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 6404]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-01183]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration #16846 and #16847; Georgia Disaster Number GA-
00123]


Presidential Declaration of a Major Disaster for Public 
Assistance Only for the State of Georgia

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major 
disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of Georgia (FEMA-
4579-DR), dated 01/12/2021.
    Incident: Tropical Storm Zeta.
    Incident Period: 10/29/2020.

DATES: Issued on 01/12/2021.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 03/15/2021.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 10/12/2021.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of 
the President's major disaster declaration on 01/12/2021, Private Non-
Profit organizations that provide essential services of a governmental 
nature may file disaster loan applications at the address listed above 
or other locally announced locations.
    The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected 
by the disaster:

Primary Counties: Banks, Carroll, Cherokee, Dawson, Douglas, Fannin, 
Forsyth, Franklin, Gilmer, Habersham, Hall, Haralson, Heard, Lumpkin, 
Paulding, Pickens, Rabun, Stephens, Towns, Union, White.
    The Interest Rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Physical Damge:
  Non-Profit Oganization With Credit Available Elsewhere.....      2.750
  Non-Profit Oganization Without Credit Available Elsehere...      2.750
For Economic Injury:
  Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere      2.750
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 168468 
and for economic injury is 168470.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

Cynthia Pitts,
Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2021-01183 Filed 1-19-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8026-03-P
#### KROMER et al. v. OZAB et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.

November 18, 1903.)

Action by Konrad ICromer and another against Otto Ozab and others. From a judgment for defendants, plaintiffs appeal. Affirmed.

J. Homer Hildreth, for appellants.

Charles H. Freidrich, for respondents.

BLANCHARD, J.

The opinion of the justice before whom this action was tried contains .an admirable discussion of the facts of the case and of the principles of law applicable thereto. His conclusions' that the defendants Retman were bona fide purchasers for value from defendants Ozab and Muller, and had no notice that the sale to Ozab and Muller by the plaintiffs was a conditional sale, are correct. The judgment appealed from should be affirmed, with costs. Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur.
#### Pearl Anolick, Respondent, v. Thomas I. Anolick, Appellant.

In an action by a wife for separation, the defendant husband appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered July 25, 1960, directing him to pay alimony, *pendente lite,*of $150 a week and a counsel fee of $2,000. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. • No opinion. Beldoek, Acting P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Brennan, JJ., concur.