alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

In Re Innovatio IP Ventures, LLC, Patent Litigation

Case No. 1:11-cv-09308

Judge James F. Holderman

Magistrate Judge Sidney Schenkier

This Document Relates To:

All Cases

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

On this day, Innovatio IP Ventures, LLC (“Innovatio”) and Hewlett-Packard Company

(“HP”) announced to the Court that they have settled their respective claims for relief asserted in

the above-captioned actions. The Court, having considered this request, is of the opinion that

their request for dismissal should be GRANTED.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that (1) all claims, cross-claims, and counterclaims made

by Innovatio against HP in the above-captioned actions, including Case Nos. 1:11-cv-09308

(consolidated) and 1:12-cv-2773 (originally 12-cv-1076 (N.D. Cal.)), are dismissed, with

prejudice to the re-filing of same; (2) all claims and counterclaims made by Innovatio against HP

customers in any of the actions consolidated in Case No. 1:11-cv-09308 (including, but not

limited to 1:11-cv-1638 ) based on their making (including using any apparatus or practicing any 1

method in making), using, selling, offering for sale, leasing, exporting, importing, or otherwise

disposing of any HP product or any combination of HP product with one or more items are

dismissed, with prejudice to re-filing of same; (3) all claims and counterclaims made by HP

against Innovatio with respect to non-infringement, license, and patent exhaustion as to the HP

Separate orders will be entered for such customers in the appropriate customer actions. 1
products accused in the above-captioned actions are dismissed, with prejudice to the re-filing of

same; (4) all claims and counterclaims made by HP against Innovatio with respect to invalidity in

the above-captioned actions are dismissed, without prejudice to the re-filing of same; and (5)

HP’s pending motion for leave to file an amended complaint [Dkt No. 980] is withdrawn as

moot. 

Signed this 26 day of February, 2014. TH

___________________________________

JAMES F. HOLDERMAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6,1

Eastern Division

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:12−cr−00109

Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman

Heon Seok Lee

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Wednesday, October 7, 2015:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman: as to Heon Seok

Lee (1); Motion hearing held on 10/7/2015. Defendant appears on motion to modify bond

and motion to set trial date. Interpreter not present but defendant agreed to proceed

without interpreter, stating he understands basic English. Defendant's appointed

co−counsel Cynthia Giacchetti is granted leave to file appearance. Defendant's motion for

trial date [37]is granted, trial date set by agreement of the parties for June 1, 2016.

Additional dates to be set forth at the next hearing. Defendant's motion to modify bond

[36] is entered and continued until October 21, 2015 at 9:45 a.m. Oral argument by both

sides on the motion; the Court requests the presence of an interpreter, pre−trial services

and Mrs. Wang, the 3rd party co−custodian, at the next date. Request for early return of

subpoenas is granted, reciprocal to both sides. There being no objection, time excluded to

6/1/2016 pursuant to 18:3161(h)(7)(B)(i). Mailed notice (rth, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:12-cr-00109 Document #: 40 Filed: 10/07/15 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:141
203.900 Scope of subpart. This subpart implements 10 U.S.C. 4701 and section 883 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021 (Pub. L. 116-283). ( a ) (i) 10 U.S.C. 4701 provides DoD whistleblower protection policies and procedures for contractor employees. Use sections 203.901 through 203.906 of this subpart in lieu of FAR sections 3.901 through 3.906 to implement 10 U.S.C. 4701. ( ii ) 10 U.S.C. 4701 does not apply to any element of the intelligence community, as defined in 50 U.S.C. 3003(4). Sections 203.901 through 203.906 do not apply to any disclosure made by an employee of a contractor or subcontractor of an element of the intelligence community if such disclosure— ( A ) Relates to an activity or an element of the intelligence community; or
( B ) Was discovered during contract or subcontract services provided to an element of the intelligence community.
( c ) Section 883 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021 (Pub. L. 116-283) prohibits the award of a DoD contract to contractors that require their employees to sign internal confidentiality agreements or statements that would prohibit or otherwise restrict such employees from lawfully reporting waste, fraud, or abuse related to the performance of a DoD contract to a designated investigative or law enforcement representative within DoD authorized to receive such information.
[87 FR 65511, Oct. 28, 2022, as amended at 87 FR 76990, Dec. 16, 2022]
Exhibit
      32(e)









**CERTIFICATION
      FURNISHED PURSUANT TO**




**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**




**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**




**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Florida Power Corporation
      (the “Company”) for the period ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jeffrey J. Lyash,
      President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
      18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that:




(1)  the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
      applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)  the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.











/s/
      Jeffrey J. Lyash


Jeffrey
      J. Lyash


President
      and Chief Executive Officer


August
      9,
      2006








This
      certification is being furnished and shall not be deemed filed by the Company
      for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
      or incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Exchange Act
      of
      1934, as amended, or the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
September 3, 2015

Mr. Craig Anthony Miller

Sunset Capture, Inc.

1201 Puerta Del Sol, Suite #229

San Clemente, CA 92673

Dear Mr. Miller :

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your petition for an exemption from

p art 21

, § § 45.23(b) , 61.113 (a) and (b)

, 91.7(a)

, 91.9(b)(2)

, 91.103(b) , 91.109, 91.119

, 91.121

, 91.151(a)

, 91.203(a) and (b)

, 91.405(a)

, 91.407(a)(1)

, 91.409(a)(2)

, 91.417 (a) and (b) of

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can No t Process Your Request

We received your exemption request on behal f of Sunset Capture, Inc. filed in D ocket

No

. FAA− 20 15

− 2421 on June 23, 2015 , but we are unable to process your request any

further. Your petition does no t comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For

us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would

benefit the public as a whole.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

For more detailed information relating to submitting petitions for exemption, please visit

http://aes.faa.gov/petition/index.html . This website helps the petitioner to meet Federal

Aviation Administration (FAA) requirements outlines in § 11.81 and helps a nswer any questions you may have.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must submit the requested information

within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption

at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions you may call the 333 Information Line (202) 267

- 2999.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and

Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure3
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

[DESCRIPTION] Exhibit 27 Financial Data Schedule for June 30,2000.
              This form contains summary financial information
              extracted from Financial Statements for California-
              Engels Mining Company for the quarter ended 6/30/2000
              and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
              financial statements.
[TEXT]
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. Dollars
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>  DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>  JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>    JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-TYPE>   3-MOS
<EXCHANGE-RATE> 1

<S>                                                 <C>
<CASH>                                                  3,820
<SECURITIES>                                            4,057
<RECEIVABLES>                                          33,563
<ALLOWANCES>                                                0
<INVENTORY>                                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                       14,395
<PP&E>                                                493,873
<DEPRECIATION>                                         25,212
<depletion>                                            18,097
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        545,675
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                  70,903
<BONDS>                                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                       0
<PREFERRED>                                                 0
<COMMON>                                              190,241
<OTHER-SE>                                            163,109
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          545,675
<SALES>                                                 1,045
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       21,376
<CGS>                                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                          45,940
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                            0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      7,927
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                       (24,564)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                   (24,564)
<DISCONTINUED>                                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                             0
<CHANGES>                                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                          (24,564)
<EPS-BASIC>                                         (0.0032)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         (0.0032)


</TABLE>
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

Overview | Guidelines | Information Correction Requests and Appeals | **Contact**

## Contact

For further information, contact: Kareen CurreyPhone: 202) 262-0754  Email:  informationquality@ed.gov

----

 

 Printable view

## How Do I Find...

          - Student loans, forgiveness
          - Higher Education Rulemaking
          - College accreditation
          - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
          - FERPA
          - FAFSA
          - 1098, tax forms

More >

## Information About...

          - Elevating Teaching
          - Early Learning
          - Engage Every Student
          - Unlocking Career Success
          - Cybersecurity

 

----

*Our mission*

Student Loans
Repaying LoansDefaulted LoansLoan ForgivenessLoan Servicers

Grants & Programs
Apply for Pell GrantsGrants ForecastApply for a Grant

Laws & Guidance
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)FERPACivil RightsNew IDEA Website

Data & Research
Education StatisticsPostsecondary Education DataED Data ExpressNation's Report CardWhat Works ClearinghouseOpen Data PlatformCOVID Relief Data

About Us
Contact UsED OfficesJobsPress ReleasesFAQsRecursos en españolBudget, PerformancePrivacy Program

----

          - Notices
          - FOIA
          - Privacy Policy
          - Accessibility
          - Security
          - Information quality
          - Inspector General
          - Whitehouse.gov
          - USA.gov
          - Benefits.gov
          - Regulations.gov
          - vote.gov
EXHIBIT
32.1


Statmon
Technologies Corp.




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


19 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report of Statmon Technologies Corp. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Geoffrey Talbot,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,
as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best
of my knowledge:




(1)        The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)        The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/
      Geoffrey P. Talbot /s/Geoffrey
      P. TalbotChief
      Executive OfficerAugust
      19, 2009




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to Statmon Technologies Corp. and will be
retained by Statmon Technologies Corp. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

KIRSHA BROWN-YOUNGER, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) No. 12 C 1979

)

LULU.COM, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

SUPPLEMENT TO MEMORANDUM ORDER

This Court's July 25, 2012 memorandum order ("Order") dismissed this action by pro se

plaintiff Kirsha Brown-Younger ("Brown-Younger"). This supplement addresses two matters,

one substantive and the other procedural, that were omitted from the Order through oversight:

1. As for substance, the more expansive July 3, 2012 memorandum

opinion and order on which the Order relied had also ordered Brown-Younger "to

file an appropriate retraction and withdrawal" of the false personal charge that she

had launched with the ARDC against Amazon's counsel and to deliver a copy of

that retraction and withdrawal "to this Court's chambers solely for informational

purposes (not for filing)." Brown-Younger has not done that, nor has she even

attempted to voice some arguable justification for having made the ARDC charge

to begin with. That total noncompliance with a direct court order is another

Case: 1:12-cv-01979 Document #: 114 Filed: 07/27/12 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:393
manifestation of Brown-Younger's disrespect for the law that ultimately led to the

dismissal of her lawsuit.1

2. As for the procedural matter referred to earlier, a review of the docket

reflects that Dkt. 75, a motion by defendant Barnes & Noble, is still shown as an

open item. In light of the action's dismissal, that motion is denied on mootness

grounds.

__________________________________________

Milton I. Shadur

Senior United States District Judge

Date: July 27, 2012

 Brown-Younger is fortunate in having dodged another bullet. On July 26 Amazon filed 1

a brief response to the Order stating that it would not pursue its earlier Rule 11 warning letter to

Brown-Younger by seeking added sanctions against her in this action.

- 2 -

Case: 1:12-cv-01979 Document #: 114 Filed: 07/27/12 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:394
HEABenOutputs_22MAR11.xls

Author: Abt Associates Inc.

Created: 3/22/11

Worksheet Description

REG_ANNUAL_VALUES

Annual restoration and annual willingness-to-pay by

region and regulatory option

ANNUAL_WTP_3

Annualized willingness-to-pay by region and regulatory

option using a 3% discount rate

ANNUAL_WTP_7

Annualized willingness-to-pay by region and regulatory

option using a 7% discount rate

Purpose: Outputs from the program estimating nonuse benefits using a habitat-based approach

File Info 1 of 5
region state rest_id cost_acre numHH reg_HH frac_tmn1 frac_tmn2 frac_tmn3 frac_tmn4 frac_baseline

calif total ca_kelp 505332 12371969.97 35.93493651 2502.929955 2616.815411 34.93194076 2930.34483

greatlakes total gl_typh 89215 32645530.65 3090.945299 5195.398855 5228.573291 3064.819418 5654.023822

gulfmexico total gom_spa 36779 18225010.59 4121.992383 11957.8294 11978.10959 4090.876794 15157.61496

inland total in_typh 67180 112801078.9 41834.23272 69927.06127 71390.12725 40812.91706 76431.81308

midatlantic total ma_spar 104386 20974820.17 5150.022861 34510.62792 34890.32154 5145.16001 37242.11798

northatlantic total na_eelg 616862 5398807.155 22.88468722 2600.903111 2727.204673 22.88468722 3183.345998

southatlantic total sa_spar 60180 16005225.16 159.0965751 346.1975466 346.5370462 159.0965751 409.5189545

REG_ANNUAL_VALUES 2 of 5
reg_WTP_1 reg_WTP_2 reg_WTP_3 reg_WTP_4 reg_WTP_bas

0 0 0 0 0

11979.45504 17779.78746 17778.79079 11949.09245 19324.76639

176729.001 574176.9887 573136.7397 175923.6553 749448.7585

159527.9606 251331.1839 257193.8617 155340.5391 270549.1088

242216.0033 2121971.581 2144151.9 243229.6073 2286940.34

533.8879358 322365.5845 338713.5777 544.2244662 397870.6372

410.7813258 722.8766459 721.5356048 414.6546717 813.3221309

REG_ANNUAL_VALUES 3 of 5
region tmn1 tmn2 tmn3 tmn4 baseline

calif 0 0 0 0 0

greatlakes 10398.51 12188.012 12178.974 10372.15 18878.899

gulfmexico 153405.8 390553.51 389569.81 152706.7 732157.23

inland 138474.8 167776.64 170581.93 134840 264306.91

midatlantic 210250.4 1280387.9 1295374.7 211130.2 2234175.3

northatlantic 463.4299 216230.75 226934.2 472.4023 388690.84

southatlantic 356.5699 470.66341 469.66168 359.932 794.5569

ANNUAL_WTP_3 4 of 5
region tmn1 tmn2 tmn3 tmn4 baseline

calif 0 0 0 0 0

greatlakes 9666.937 9587.584 9576.727 9642.436 19194.211

gulfmexico 142613.2 305859.9 304964.7 141963.3 744385.59

inland 128732.6 129956.7 131619.1 125353.6 268721.32

midatlantic 195458.6 929058.4 940749.9 196276.5 2271490.1

northatlantic 430.826 167965.1 176159.2 439.1672 395182.68

southatlantic 331.484 359.0887 358.2637 334.6096 807.82745

ANNUAL_WTP_7 5 of 5
Defining Program Success 

Taking a closer look at Gainful Employment. 
100% 

90% 

80% 

70% 

60% 

50% 

40% 

30% 

20% 

10% 

0% 

PROGRAM 1 

10 Graduates Earning $30,000/year 

Loan Payment $3,650* /year 

*Annual loan payment of $3,650 = $26,431 based on a 10 year amortization at a 6.8°/o interest rate. 

Annual Earnings $30,000/year 

12.1°/o Debt/Earnings Rate= Program Failure ._. ,___,.. __. - ....-- ---- .-~ .--. 
100% 

90% 

80% 

70% 

60% 

50% 

40% 

30% 

10% 

0% 

PROGRAM 2 

99 Graduates Earning $20,000/year 

Loan Payment $3,650/year 
PROGRAM 3 

200 Graduates Earning $10,000/year 

99 borrowed 

Loan payment $3,650/year 

101 did not borrow 

, $10,000/year no debt 

t 

i
#### 2144.102 Policy.

For all FEGLI Program contracts, the Contracting Officer's advance approval will be required on subcontracts or modifications to subcontracts when the cost of that portion of the subcontract that is charged the FEGLI Program contract exceeds $550,000 and is at least 25 percent of the total cost of the subcontract.

[70 FR 41153, July 18, 2005]
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 95 

To require the Secretary of Energy to obtain the consent of affected State 

and local governments before making an expenditure from the Nuclear 

Waste Fund for a nuclear waste repository. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 11, 2017 

Mr. HELLER (for himself and Ms. CORTEZ MASTO) introduced the following 

bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment 

and Public Works 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of Energy to obtain the consent 

of affected State and local governments before making 

an expenditure from the Nuclear Waste Fund for a nuclear waste repository. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Nuclear Waste In5 formed Consent Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS. 

7 In this Act, the terms ‘‘affected Indian tribe’’, ‘‘af8 fected unit of local government’’, ‘‘Commission’’, ‘‘highVerDate Sep 11 2014 04:29 Jan 24, 2017 Jkt 069200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S95.IS S95

smartinez on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 95 IS

1 level radioactive waste’’, ‘‘repository’’, ‘‘spent nuclear 

2 fuel’’, and ‘‘unit of general local government’’ have the 

3 meanings given the terms in section 2 of the Nuclear 

4 Waste Policy Act of 1982 (42 U.S.C. 10101). 

5 SEC. 3. CONSENT BASED APPROVAL. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary may not make an 

7 expenditure from the Nuclear Waste Fund for the costs 

8 of the activities described in paragraphs (4) and (5) of 

9 section 302(d) of the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982 

10 (42 U.S.C. 10222(d)) unless the Secretary has entered 

11 into an agreement to host a repository with— 

12 (1) the Governor of the State in which the re13 pository is proposed to be located; 

14 (2) each affected unit of local government; 

15 (3) any unit of general local government contig16 uous to the affected unit of local government if 

17 spent nuclear fuel or high-level radioactive waste will 

18 be transported through that unit of general local 

19 government for disposal at the repository; and 

20 (4) each affected Indian tribe. 

21 (b) CONDITIONS ON AGREEMENT.—Any agreement 

22 to host a repository under this Act— 

23 (1) shall be in writing and signed by all parties; 

24 (2) shall be binding on the parties; and 


smartinez on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 95 IS

1 (3) shall not be amended or revoked except by 

2 mutual agreement of the parties. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS