alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Europeiska unionens C 330A/7 ok

| | ISSN 1977-1061 |
| --- | --- |
| Europeiska unionens
  officiella tidning | C 330A |
| | |
| Svensk utgåva | Meddelanden och upplysningar | 58 årgången7 oktober 2015 |

ISSN 1977-1061

Europeiska unionens

officiella tidning

C 330A

Svensk utgåva

Meddelanden och upplysningar

58 årgången7 oktober 2015

---

| Informationsnummer | Innehållsförteckning | Sida |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Yttranden |
| | ADMINISTRATIVA FÖRFARANDEN |
| | Europeiska rekryteringsbyrån (Epso) |
| 2015/C 330A/01 | Meddelande om annullering | 1 |

Informationsnummer

Innehållsförteckning

Sida

V   Yttranden

ADMINISTRATIVA FÖRFARANDEN

Europeiska rekryteringsbyrån (Epso)

2015/C 330A/01

Meddelande om annullering

1

---

| SV | |
| --- | --- |

SV

---

V Yttranden

ADMINISTRATIVA FÖRFARANDEN

Europeiska rekryteringsbyrån (Epso)

| 7.10.2015 | SV | Europeiska unionens officiella tidning | CA 330/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.10.2015

SV

Europeiska unionens officiella tidning

CA 330/1

---

MEDDELANDE OM ANNULLERING

(2015/C 330 A/01)

Härmed annulleras det meddelande om allmänt uttagningsprov, EPSO/AD/321/15 – Handläggare inom området revision (AD 5/AD 7), som offentliggjorts i Europeiska unionens officiella tidning
   (1).

---

(1)  EUT C 316 A, 24.9.2015, s. 1.

---
#### PEOPLE ex rel. LORD v. FEITNER et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

November 13, 1903.)

Proceeding by the people, on the relation of Elizabeth S. Lord, against Thomas L. Feitner and others.

No opinion. Application dismissed.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.1

     THE BURLINGTON NORTHERN AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY and SUBSIDIARIES
               COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                      (In Millions, Except Ratio Amounts)
                                  (Unaudited)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                Six Months Ended
                                                                                     June 30,
                                                                        -----------------------------------
                                                                                 2000                  1999
                                                                        -------------        --------------
<S>                                                                      <C>                  <C>
Earnings:

  Pre-tax income                                                               $  837                $  815

  Add:
    Interest and fixed charges,
      excluding capitalized interest                                              154                   151

    Portion of rent under long-term
      operating leases representative
      of an interest factor                                                        84                    93

    Distributed income of investees
      accounted for under the equity method                                        45                     -

    Amortization of capitalized interest                                            3                     2

  Less:  Undistributed equity in earnings
             of investments accounted for
             under the equity method                                                9                     9
                                                                        -------------        --------------

  Total earnings available for fixed charges                                   $1,114                $1,052
                                                                        =============        ==============

Fixed charges:

  Interest and fixed charges                                                   $  158                $  157

  Portion of rent under long-term operating
    leases representative of an interest factor                                    84                    93
                                                                        -------------        --------------
  Total fixed charges                                                          $  242                $  250
                                                                        =============        ==============

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                                              4.60x                 4.21x
</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000016343
<NAME> PATRIOT AMERICAN HOSPITALITY, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999             MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          73,003                  89,885
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   15,187                   8,589
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0                       0
<PP&E>                                       5,210,374               5,176,977
<DEPRECIATION>                                 259,194                 216,548
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,843,404               6,749,206
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0                       0
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                         54                      54
<COMMON>                                         2,342                   2,135
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,483,034               2,466,670
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,843,404               6,749,206
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               193,898                 113,165
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               105,475                  44,260
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              86,104                  34,251
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 16,931                  38,245
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (2,477)                   (371)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                 (18,716)
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                    11,852                  15,497
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.02                    0.14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.06)                   0.13
        

</TABLE>
Case: 3:12-cr-50027 Document #: 66 Filed: 02/14/13 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:547
Case: 1:12-cv-01270 Document #: 9 Filed: 03/09/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:53
Disclaimer

### State Department of Education

West Virginia Department of Education1900 Kanawha Boulevard EastCharleston, WV 25305-0330Phone: (304) 558-2681Website: http://wvde.state.wv.us/

### State Higher Education Agency

West Virginia Higher Education Policy Commission1018 Kanawha Boulevard EastSuite 700Charleston, WV 25301Phone: (304) 558-2101Website: http://www.wvhepc.edu/

### Special Education Agency

Office of Special EducationWest Virginia Department of Education1900 Kanawha Boulevard EastCharleston, WV 25305-0330Phone: (304) 558-2696Website: http://wvde.state.wv.us/osp/

### State Adult Education Agency

Adult Education State Department of Education Building Six, Room  2431900 Kanawha Boulevard, East Charleston, WV 25305 Phone: (304) 558-0280 Fax: (304) 558-1056 Website: https://wvde.us/adult-education/

Back to state map
217.7402 Exceptions. ( a ) The following undefinitized contract actions (UCAs) are not subject to this subpart. However, the contracting officer shall apply the policy and procedures to them to the maximum extent practicable (also see paragraph (b) of this section): ( 1 ) Purchases at or below the simplified acquisition threshold.
( 2 ) Special access programs.
( 3 ) Congressionally mandated long-lead procurement contracts.
( b ) If the contracting officer determines that it is impracticable to adhere to the procedures of this subpart for a particular contract action that falls within one of the categories in paragraph (a) of this section, the contracting officer shall provide prior notice, through agency channels, electronically via email to the Principal Director, Defense Pricing, Contracting, and Acquisition Policy (Contract Policy), at *osd.pentagon.ousd-a-s.mbx.dpc-cp@mail.mil .*
[75 FR 48277, Aug. 10, 2010, as amended at 80 FR 72607, Nov. 20, 2015; 84 FR 39206, Aug. 9, 2019; 84 FR 48510, Sept. 13, 2019; 89 FR 60831, July 29, 2024]
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, July 14, 2017.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, July 14, 2017

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A17D0532. COURTNEY THOMAS v. MICHELLE MUSGROVE .

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

16CV0904
NUMBER 13

- 13

- 00 389

- CR



### COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

- EDINBURG

JOSEPH COUCH

, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

On appeal from the County Court at Law

of Aransas County, Texas.



### ORDER TO FILE APPELLATE BRIEF

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Garza

Order Per Curiam

This cause is before the Court on appellant's motion for extension of time to file the

brief. Appellant ’ s brief is due to be filed on September 12, 2013 . Appellant is

requesting until December 11, 2013 , to file the appellate brief in this cause.

The Court, having fully examined and considered appellant's motion for extension2 of time to file the brief, is of the opinion that, in the interest of just ice, appellant's motion for

extension of time to file the brief should be granted with order.

The Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART appellant's first motion for

extension of time. This motion is GRANTED insofar as the Court will extend appellant's

deadline to file his brief until November 12 , 2013 . This motion is DENIED insofar as the

Court will not allow an extension until December 11, 2013

. Further motions for extension

of time will not be favorably entertained by the Court.

The Clerk of this C ourt is ORDERED to serve a copy of this order on the Hon orable

Terry G. Collins by certified mail, return receipt requested.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 47.2(b).

D elivered and filed th e

11th day of October , 20 13

.
#### John E. Ruppel, Appellant, v. Middleport Volunteer Fire Company No. 1, Inc., et al., Respondents.

Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied. Present — Bastow, J. P., Goldman, Halpern, McClusky and Henry, JJ.
| |  |           
| |  | ----------
| |  | Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, J. Frank Harrison, III,
Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Steven D. Westphal, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 as adopted pursuant to § 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                              
|--------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                              
|/s/    J. Frank Harrison, III                                 
|J. Frank Harrison, III                                        
|Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer
|March 14, 2007                                                
|                                                              
|/s/    Steven D. Westphal                                     
|Steven D. Westphal                                            
|Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer             
|March 14, 2007
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 11 (Tuesday, January 19, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 5225]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-00946]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Human Genome Research Institute; Notice of Closed 
Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Human Genome Research Institute 
Special Emphasis Panel; GENETIC COUNSELING PROCESSES AND PRACTICES.
    Date: February 8, 2021.
    Time: 9:00 a.m. to 5:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Human Genome Research Institute, National 
Institutes of Health, 6700B Rockledge Drive, Room 3184, Bethesda, MD 
20892, (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Rudy O. Pozzatti, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Branch, National Human Genome Research 
Institute, National Institutes of Health, 6700B Rockledge Drive, 
Room 3184, Bethesda, MD 20817, (301) 402-0838, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f0809f8a8a91848482b09d91999cde9e9998de979f86"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="7f0f1005051e0b0b0d3f121e16135111161751181009">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.172, Human 
Genome Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 12, 2021.
David W. Freeman,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2021-00946 Filed 1-15-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Order Form (01/2005)

United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois

Name of Assigned Judge

or Magistrate Judge

Philip G. Reinhard Sitting Judge if Other

than Assigned Judge

CASE NUMBER 12 C 50089 DATE 8/16/2012

CASE

TITLE

Bank of America, N.A. vs. Kent W. Shodeen, et al.

DOCKET ENTRY TEXT:

For the reasons stated below, defendants’ motion to stay is denied. Defendants motion for extension of time

to answer is granted with the modification that defendants shall answer the complaint on or before 8/30/2012. 

Plaintiff’s motion for default judgment is denied without prejudice. 

O[ For further details see text below.] Electronic Notices.

STATEMENT - OPINION

Defendants, Kent W. Shodeen, individually and Kent W. Shodeen as trustee of the Kent W. Shodeen Trust

No. 1 move to stay this action pending resolution of a pending state court mortgage foreclosure action, identified as

Bank of America v. Tanna Farms, LLC, et al, No. 12 CH 1035 said to be pending in Kane County, Illinois or

alternatively for an extension of time to file a responsive pleading. Plaintiff, Bank of America, N.A., brought the

action pending in this court for breach of personal guaranties by the defendants. Plaintiff moves for default judgment

because defendants did not file a responsive pleading but only moved to stay.

Defendants argue this matter should be stayed because resolution of the foreclosure action will either show

plaintiff is not entitled to any recovery or because any amount recovered by plaintiff in the foreclosure action will

reduce the amount due under the guaranties. In deciding whether to grant a stay, the court must first determine

whether the concurrent state and federal actions are actually parallel. JLM Financial Investments 4 LLC v. Aktipis,

No. 11 C 2561, 2012 WL 74856, *1 (N.D. Ill. Jan. 9, 2012) (Gottschall, J.).

Defendants have not filed the state court pleadings with the court in conjunction with its motion to stay. The

only information the court has to go on is the case name and number. Without more, the court is not in any position to

find that the actions are “actually parallel.” [While the court can take judicial notice of other pending actions, the

moving party is obligated to ask the court to do so and to provide copies of the relevant pleadings.]

 Generally, an action on a guaranty is not actually parallel to a mortgage foreclosure. Foreclosure actions

proceed from property law while a guaranty is a creature of contract. Id. at 2. The entire purpose of a guaranty is to

allow the creditor to proceed against the guarantors without having to wait for a foreclosure action to go to judgment.

Id. Defendants have not shown this action to be actually parallel to the state court action.

For the foregoing reasons, defendants’ motion to stay is denied. Defendants motion for extension of time to

answer is granted with the modification that defendants shall answer the complaint on or before 8/30/2012. Plaintiff’s

motion for default judgment is denied without prejudice. As a general rule, cases should be decided on the merits.

12C50089 Bank of America, N.A. vs. Kent W. Shodeen, et al. Page 1 of 1
**EXHIBIT
      32.0**





**WRITTEN
      STATEMENT OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL
      OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C.** **?** **1350**





Solely
      for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we, the undersigned Chief
      Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Cal-Maine Foods Inc. (the
      “Company”), hereby certify, based on their knowledge, that the Quarterly Report
      on Form 10-Q/A of the Company for the quarter ended March 3, 2007 (the “Report”)
      fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange
      Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
      all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.






/s/
      Fred
      R. Adams, Jr.





Fred
      R.
      Adams, Jr.


Chairman
      of the Board and Chief Executive Officer






/s/
      Timothy A. Dawson





Timothy
      A. Dawson


Vice
      President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary








Date : 
      April 30, 2007
#### PRESLEY *v.*JONES & OGLESBY.

Where there was endorsed on the bill of exceptions an entry signed by counsel for the plaintiff in error, stating: “I hereby certify that I have served J. M. Moon, attorney for defendant in error, with a copy of the bill of exceptions and certificate of court, by mailing him a copy of the same at Cariersville, Georgia, on the 29th day of November, 1912,” and no other service, or acknowledgment or waiver of service, appears, the writ of error will be dismissed on motion.

April 18, 1913.

From Gordon superior court. Motion to dismiss.

*J. M. Lang,*for plaintiff in error. *J. M. Moon,*contra.

Lumpkin, J.

"Where a litigant has obtained, a judgment in the trial court, and it is sought to reverse such judgment, the statute requires service on the opposite party or his attorney to be made in the manner therein pointed out. Civil Code, § 6160. It is important that the adverse party or his counsel should be served, so that they may know of the exception taken to the judgment and the effort to reverse it. If service of bills of exceptions generally were permitted to be made by mailing a copy to counsel, it would doubtless frequently happen that cases would be heard in this court without any knowledge on the part of the litigant or counsel interested in sustaining the judgment. The legislature have not thought it desirable to risk to the uncertainties of the mail the serving of bills of -exception upon parties in this State; nor is there any provision for traversing such an entry and the hearing of evidence by this court as to whether a paper *so*mailed was received. In only one case have they provided that mailing a notice shall be sufficient service of a bill of exceptions to authorize this court to take jurisdiction. Such a provision is made in case of a non-resident of the State, who is not represented by counsel so that he may be served with a copy of the bill of exceptions. Civil Code, § 6161. In that event, the clerk, upon request of counsel suing out the bill of exceptions (not the attorney himself), is required to give notice to the non-resident defendant by mailing' a letter addressed to him at his post-office. This was not allowed as being the most desirable method of service, but as matter of necessity, where it could not otherwise be perfected; and it is declared that the judgment made shall bind the -defendant so far as his assets in this State are concerned. • No such necessity existed in the ease under consideration, and the service was not made in *815the manner which the statute requires. *Albritton*v. *Tygart,*ante, 231 (77 S. E. 28).

*Writ of error dismissed.*

*All the Justicces concur.*