alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

           WINTHROP RESIDENTIAL ASSOCIATES III, A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
           ----------------------------------------------------------

                                DECEMBER 31, 2002
                                -----------------




SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION REQUIRED PURSUANT TO SECTION 9.4 OF THE PARTNERSHIP
AGREEMENT (UNAUDITED)

1.   Statement of Cash Available for Distribution for the:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                 Year Ended         Three Months Ended
                                                              December 31, 2002      December 31, 2002
                                                             -------------------    -------------------
<S>                                                          <C>                    <C>
     Net Income                                              $           195,000    $            21,000

     Add:  Equity in losses of Local Limited Partnerships                121,000                 65,000
           Depreciation                                                  225,000                 75,000

     Less: Cash to reserves                                             (433,000)              (134,000)
                                                             -------------------    -------------------

     Cash Available for Distribution                         $           108,000    $            27,000
                                                             ===================    ===================

     Distributions allocated to General Partners             $             8,000    $             2,000
                                                             ===================    ===================

     Distributions allocated to Limited Partners             $           100,000    $            25,000
                                                             ===================    ===================
</TABLE>

2.   Fees and other compensation paid or accrued by the Partnership to the
     General Partners, or their affiliates, during the three months ended
     December 31, 2002:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
          Entity Receiving                         Form of
            Compensation                         Compensation
     ----------------------------  -----------------------------------------------  ------------------
     <S>                           <C>                                              <C>
     General Partners              Interest in Cash Available for Distribution      $            2,000


     WFC Realty Co., Inc.          Interest in Cash Available for Distribution      $                5
     (Initial limited partner)
</TABLE>



                                       44
#### Arthur Kastner, Respondent, v Royal Vending Corp., Appellant.

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, entered September 11, 1978, granting an application by the petitioner for a permanent stay of arbitration, unanimously reversed, on the law, and the motion denied and arbitration directed, with $50 costs and disbursements of this appeal to appellant. The petitioner, along with another, guaranteed an agreement between the respondent, a coin-operated vending machine company, and Ego Lounge, Inc., where such equipment was installed. The respondent, contending that there was a breach of the agreement, commenced arbitration pursuant to a clause to that effect in the agreement. The petitioner commenced a special proceeding pursuant to CPLR 7503 (subd [b]) to stay arbitration contending that the agreements involved violated the Federal and State antitrust laws. If this were a well-founded contention, arbitration could properly be stayed for it would be a matter to be determined by a court. *(Matter of Aimcee Wholesale Corp. [Tomar Prods.],*21 NY2d 621.) However, the allegations are merely conclusory, and the contention of illegality is insubstantial. (See *Matter of Riccardi [Modern Silver Linen Supply Co.]*36 NY2d 945.) It is incumbent upon a party seeking to stay the arbitration to make a prima facie showing that the alleged restraint of trade is unreasonable. *(Matter of Schachter [Witte & Co.],*41 NY2d 1067.) This was not done here. Moreover, we are informed by counsel for the petitioner (the respondent on this appeal) that his client does not want to "defend this appeal”. Accordingly, arbitration should be directed. Concur— Murphy, P. J., Kupferman, Sandler, Lane and Lynch, JJ.
### §3414. Other programs relating to wheat or wheat food research or nutrition education

Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to preempt or interfere with the workings of any other program relating to wheat or wheat foods research or nutrition education organized and operating under the laws of the United States or any State.

(Pub. L. 95–113, title XVII, §1715, Sept. 29, 1977, 91 Stat. 1040.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Oct. 1, 1977, see section 1901 of Pub. L. 95–113, set out as an Effective Date of 1977 Amendment note under section 1307 of this title.
# U.S. Department of Education

# Negotiated Rulemaking Public Hearing

# November 4, 2014

# Anaheim, California

# List of Presenters

[11/20/2014]
#### Alexander Very, Respondent, v. Paul Tucci, Appellant.

Order, entered on June 27, 1962, unanimously reversed on the law and the motion to strike the first affirmative defense as sham denied, without costs. It appears that there is an issue as to whether the bills received by plaintiff were authorized by defendant doctor or were sent out without his approval as a matter of hospital routine. If the latter, coupled with the absence of any payment, there would be a serious issue as to whether the services were performed “without receiving compensation” (General Municipal Law, § 50-d). If it be assumed that the original relationship was as a charity patient but that bills were sent pursuant to the permission given by section 585 of the New York City Charter, there is also a question as to whether or not this fact changes the original relationship and so obviates the necessity for notice. We do not pass on this question in the absence of the full development of the facts in regard to it. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, Eager and Steuer, JJ.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Current Report on Form 10-Q of Claires Stores, Inc. (the Company)
for the quarterly period ended April 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the Report), I, Marla Schaefer, Co-Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ Marla L. SchaeferMarla L. SchaeferCo-Chief Executive Officer June 8, 2005
Case: 1:12-cv-02637 Document #: 9 Filed: 06/06/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:42
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          |  |  |  |  |
|---|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|--|--|
| 1 | The Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2020, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 4, 2020 (“accompanied report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |

|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                 |  |  |  |  |
|---|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|--|--|
| 2 | The information contained in the accompanied report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of Capital Southwest Corporation. |

|                                |         |                               |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|--------------------------------|---------|-------------------------------|--|--|--|--|--|--|
|                           |    |                          |
| Date:  August 4, 2020 | By: | /s/ Michael S. Sarner |
|                           |    | Michael S. Sarner             |
|                           |    | Chief Financial Officer       |
UNITED STATES ENVIRONM ENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

NATIONAL VEHICLE FUELS EMISSIONS LABORATORY
Ann Arbor , MI 48105

O ffice of Air and Radiation

MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Meeting with GM Representatives July 23, 2009 and October 16, 2009
FROM: Ed Nam

Director L ight Duty Onroad Center
TO: Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0472

This memorandum documents meetings held on July 23, 2009 and October 16, 2009 between Barbara Kiss and Nathan Wilmont of General Motors and Ed Nam, Ben Ellies, Dave Ganss, and Jeff Cherry of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). We discussed the results of Ricardo Modeling as compared to internal General Motors modeling of various technologies as applied to light duty pickup trucks. General Motors shared confidential data during the discussion.
#### 1413.201 General.

The procedures set forth in the Federal Supply Schedule for Government-wide Commercial Credit Card Services, Treasury Financial Manual, TFM 4-4500, and “U.S. Department of Interior Handbook for Utilization of Government Wide Commercial Credit Card” issued by PAM contain guidance on using Government-wide purchase card services.
#### 1809.104-4 Subcontractor responsibility.

Generally, the Canadian Commercial Corporation's (CCC) proposal of a firm as its subcontractor is sufficient basis for an affirmative determination of responsibility. However, when the CCC determination of responsibility is not consistent with other information available to the contracting office, the contracting officer shall request from the CCC and any other sources whatever information is necessary to make the responsibility determination.

Upon request, CCC shall be furnished the rationale for any subsequent determination of nonresponsibility.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM (INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1996) AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000017797
<NAME> CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY
       
<S>                                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                          9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                      DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                                           SEP-30-1996
<BOOK-VALUE>                                              PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                               $6,348,981
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                               $454,796
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    $620,950
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                                  $590,585
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                            $175,099
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                          $8,190,411
<COMMON>                                                $1,191,449
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                                    ($790)
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                                     $1,492,272
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                          $2,682,931
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                           $0
<PREFERRED>                                               $143,801
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                                    $2,459,445
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                              $0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                                       $0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                                  $0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                             $138,345
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                                       $0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                                     $0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                                $0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                          $2,765,889
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                           $8,190,411
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                               $2,301,143
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                                      $226,390
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                              $1,661,234
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                              $1,887,624
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                                   $413,519
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                         $39,669
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                            $453,188
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  $143,027
<NET-INCOME>                                              $310,161
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                                 $7,206
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                             $302,955
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                                  $196,061
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                                 $130,437
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                                    $832,035
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                $2.11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                $2.11
        

</TABLE>
#### 1852.237-70 Emergency evacuation procedures.

As prescribed at 1837.110-70(a), insert the following clause:

# Emergency Evacuation Procedures (DEC 1988)

The contractor shall assure that its personnel at Government facilities are familiar with the functions of the Government's emergency evacuation procedures. If requested by the Contracting Officer, the Contractor shall designate an individual or individuals as contact points to provide for efficient and rapid evacuation of the facility if and when required.

(End of clause)

[54 FR 28340, July 5, 1989, as amended at 54 FR 39376, Sept. 26, 1989; 62 FR 4476, Jan. 30, 1997]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF CHASE GENERAL CORPORATION CONTAINED IN ITS QUARTERLY
REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         242,403
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  225,333
<ALLOWANCES>                                    19,474
<INVENTORY>                                    207,521
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               677,100
<PP&E>                                       1,076,644
<DEPRECIATION>                                 843,753
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 909,991
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          171,855
<BONDS>                                        121,606
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  2,361,440
<COMMON>                                       969,834
<OTHER-SE>                                 (2,714,744)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   909,997
<SALES>                                      1,881,294
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,882,838
<CGS>                                        1,441,195
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  321,450
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                11,805
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,745
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                102,643
<INCOME-TAX>                                    26,946
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    75,697
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
#### (A) The People of the State of New York v. Cornelius Askew. (J. Vaughan Millane, Esq.) (B) The People of the State of New York v. Otis H. Brown. (Howard V. Burke, Esq.) (C) The People of the State of New York v. Albert F. Eckert. (Robert L. Fleischer, Esq.) (D) The People of the State of New York v. William A. Jackson. (Robert Switzer, Esq.) (E) The People of the State of New York ex rel. Albert Neverosky v. Walter H. Wilkins, as Warden of Attica Prison. (Justyn E. Miller, Esq.) (F) The People of the State of New York v. Frank Orgovan. (Victor T. Fuzak, Esq.) (G) The People of the State of New York v. Ronald Petty. (John C. Broughton, Esq.) (H) The People of the State of New York v. James A. Scott. (Raymond Gage, Esq.) (I) The People of the State of New York v. William A. Tarpley. (Charles F. Crimi, Esq.) (J) The People of the State of New York ex rel. George Kennedy v. McKenzie. (John Aletto, Esq.) (K) The People of the State of New York v. Henry Lee Hines. (Gerald Beckerman, Esq.) (L) The People of the State of New York v. William Johnson. (Adolph M. Newman, Esq.) (M) The People of the State of New York ex rel. Jeston Carl Kenyon, Jr., v. Walter H. Wilkins, as Warden of Attica Prison. (Miss Diana Gaylord.) (N) The People of the State of New York v. Howard E. Mackey. (Robert Anderson, Esq.) (O) The People of the State of New York v. Kenneth Roberts. (Don B. Allen, Esq.) (P) The People of the State of New York v. James Taylor. (Albert Scialfo, Esq.)

[In each appeal] Motion granted to prosecute appeal from original record, or original papers, counsel assigned and time for argument of appeal enlarged to include November 1960 Term of court.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                     EXHIBIT 11
 
                ALPHA TECHNOLOGIES GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
 
                      COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER SHARE
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                       YEAR ENDED
                                           -----------------------------------
                                           OCTOBER 29, OCTOBER 27, OCTOBER 26,
                                              1995        1996        1997
                                           ----------- ----------- -----------
<S>                                        <C>         <C>         <C>
Shares:
  Weighted average common shares
   outstanding............................  5,984,584   6,277,585    6,682,106
  Net common shares issuable on exercise
   of stock options.......................    620,563          --           --
                                           ----------   ---------  -----------
Weighted average common and common
 equivalent shares outstanding............  6,605,147   6,277,585    6,682,106
                                           ==========   =========  ===========
Net income (loss)......................... $3,748,000   $(299,000) $(3,352,000)
                                           ==========   =========  ===========
Per share amount.......................... $     0.57   $   (0.05) $     (0.50)
                                           ==========   =========  ===========
</TABLE>
--------
(1) See Note 10 to the consolidated financial statements for further
    information regarding the calculation of weighted average common and
    common equivalent shares outstanding.
**EXHIBIT13.3**

 

**CERTIFICATE**

**FORRENEWAL AND REVIVAL OF CHARTER**

 

AXCESSInternational, Inc. (formerly AXCESS Inc.), a corporation organized under thelaws of Delaware, the Certificate of Incorporation of which was filed in theOffice of the Secretary of State on the Thirteenth day of November, 1982, thecharter of which was voided for non-payment of taxes, now desires to procure arestoration, renewal and revival of its charter, and hereby certifies asfollows:

 

1.              The name ofthis corporation is AXCESS International, Inc. (formerly AXCESS Inc.).

 

2.              Itsregistered office in the State of Delaware is located at 1209 Orange Street,Wilmington, County of New Castle (19801). The name of its registered agent is Corporation Trust Company.

 

3.             Thisrenewal and revival of the charter of the corporation is to be perpetual.

 

4.              This corporation was dulyorganized and carried on the business authorized by its charter until the firstday of March, 2002, at which time its charter became inoperative and void fornon-payment of taxes.

 

5.              Thiscertificate for renewal and revival is filed by authority of the duly electeddirectors of the corporation in accordance with the laws of the State ofDelaware.

 

                                INTESTIMONY WHEREOF, and in compliance with the provisions of Section 312 of theDelaware General Corporation Law, as amended, providing for the renewal,extension and restoration of charters, the undersigned duly authorized officerof AXCESS International, Inc. (formerly AXCESS Inc.) has set his hand to thisCertificate of Renewal and Revival this 10th day of April, 2003.

 

 

| By:    |   | /S/  ALLAN L. FRANK                                   |
|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------|
| Name:  |   | Allan Frank                                           |
| Title: |   | Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary |

 

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 1 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. CON. RES. 1

 Extending the life of the Joint Congressional Committee on Inaugural 
                              Ceremonies.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 3, 2017

Mr. McConnell submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
                        considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
 Extending the life of the Joint Congressional Committee on Inaugural 
                              Ceremonies.

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring),

SECTION 1. REAUTHORIZATION OF JOINT COMMITTEE.

    Effective from January 3, 2017, the joint committee created by 
Senate Concurrent Resolution 28 (114th Congress), to make the necessary 
arrangements for the inauguration of the President-elect and the Vice 
President-elect of the United States, is continued with the same power 
and authority provided for in that resolution.

SEC. 2. USE OF CAPITOL.

    Effective from January 3, 2017, the provisions of Senate Concurrent 
Resolution 29 (114th Congress), to authorize the use of the rotunda and 
Emancipation Hall of the Capitol by the Joint Congressional Committee 
on Inaugural Ceremonies in connection with the proceedings and 
ceremonies conducted for the inauguration of the President-elect and 
the Vice President-elect of the United States are continued with the 
same power and authority provided for in that resolution.
                                 <all>
```