alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
David A. Kekich
                                  1533 Via Leon
                         Palos Verdes Estates, CA 90274
                                  310-265-8644






June 19, 2000



Board of Directors
Central Capital Venture Corp.
2660 Townsgate Road, Suite 725
Westlake Village, CA 91361

Gentlemen,

         Please  accept my  resignation  as an officer  and  director of Central
Capital Venture Corp. as of this date, June 19, 2000.

         It has been a pleasure serving you.


With best regards,


S/David A. Kekich

David A. Kekich


















                                       41
#### 18.119 Trade agreements.

The policies and procedures of FAR 25.4 may not apply to acquisitions not awarded under full and open competition (see 25.401(a)(5)).

[72 FR 46344, Aug. 17, 2007. Redesignated at 76 FR 18309, Apr. 1, 2011]
|   | · | The                Covered Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)                or                15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;                and                    |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                     |
|   | · | The                information contained in the Covered Report fairly presents, in all                material respects, the financial condition and results of operations                of                the Company. |

| Date:                March 3, 2006 | /s/ Paul                A.                Farr                                   Paul                A. FarrSenior                Vice President-Financial PPL                Electric Utilities Corporation |
|------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
#### Marie Aschmutat, Appellant, v. State of New York, Respondent. Willy Aschmutat, an Incompetent Person, by Marie Aschmutat, as Committee of His Person and Property, Appellant, v. State of New York, Respondent.

(Claim No. 33993.) (Claim No. 33994.)

Appeals from judgments of the Court of Claims which dismissed claims for personal injuries sustained when claimants, on a dark, rainy night, while walking westerly upon the northerly shoulder of a State highway in the Village of Ballston Spa, and thus with their backs to westbound traffic, were struck by an automobile which approached from their rear. From the intersection at which claimants entered, the pavement of the highway was 20 feet wide for some 173 feet westerly and then abruptly narrowed to 16 feet, the reduction being 2 feet on each side. There was no sidewalk but there did exist a footpath of sorts, at least 5 feet north of the pavement and at some elevation from it. There are contradictions and inconsistencies in the trial court’s findings and refusals to find, but it seems to us to have been established that claimants, with their daughter, were proceeding in single file, each 3 to 4 feet from the edge of the pavement and were successively struck, about at the point where the pavement had narrowed to its minimum width, by an automobile operated by one Garrison, a man. of 75 years, who said that as he approached the narrowed portion of the highway, driving close to the edge, his vision was affected by approaching eastbound ears and that as the last of these was almost opposite he saw an object immediately ahead and felt his car bump as he struck claimant Willy Asohmutat. The trial court did not pass on the issue of the State’s negligence. Claimants were found negligent in “ deliberately placing themselves in this situation, wearing dark clothing on a foggy, rainy night under the conditions of which they were fully aware ”. The court also found that claimants, by failing to keep to the left of the center of the highway, violated subdivision 6 of section 85 of the Vehicle and Traffic Law, as then constituted, but this finding was in error as the statute applied only to pedestrians upon the paved or travelled portion of the highway. *(Miller*
      *845v. *Hine,*281 App. Div. 387, 389.) It is undisputed that the abrupt reduction in the width of the pavement constituted improper design and that the highway generally was in gross disrepair. It is equally clear, however, that all the conditions complained of were well known to claimants and to Garrision, all of whom made frequent use of the highway. In our view of the evidence, the defects did not affect the movement of the ear and the accident must be attributed to the negligence of Garrison and of the claimants. If there was danger in the degree now asserted it was known to claimants and its existence imposed upon them the duty to use the footpath, even at the relatively minor inconvenience involved. Judgments unanimously affirmed, without costs. Settle order. [17 Misc 2d 553.]
#### Michael A. Schiff, an Infant, by David Schiff, His Guardian ad Litem, et al., Appellants, v. John Arborio, Inc., Respondent.

Motion to dismiss appeal denied -as moot, without costs. The papers on appeal are now fully filed and the case will be placed on the September Term Calendar. Present — Bergan, P. J., Coon, Gibson, Herlihy and Reynolds, JJ.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-1862
ALVEDA INGRAM RICHARDSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MARCIA G. SHEIN, Defendant - Appellee, and FEDERAL CRIMINAL DEFENDANTS LAW CENTER, INCORPORATED, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (CA97-3439-CCB) Submitted: December 22, 1999 Decided: January 13, 2000 Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.2 Alveda Ingram Richardson, Appellant Pro Se. Joshua R. Treem, SCHULMAN, TREEM, KAMINKOW & GILDEN, P.A., Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Alveda Richardson appeals the district court’s order denyingher motion for summary judgment and granting Marcia Shein’s crossmotion for summary judgment in Richardson’s legal malpractice and breach of contract action. We have reviewed the record and thedistrict court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Richardson v. Shein , No. CA-97-3439-CCB (D. Md. May 27, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**
MEMORANDUM OPINION
N o. 04

- 22

- 00864

- CR
EX PARTE Julian BAZAN From the 399th Judicial District Court , Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2019CR1157

- W2 Honorable Frank J. Castro , Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM Sitting: Irene Rios , Justice Beth Watkins , Justice Liza A. Rodriguez , Justice Delivered and Filed: February 1, 2023
DIS MISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION Appellant seeks to appeal the trial court’s order recommending the Court of Criminal Appeals deny h is post

- conviction applica tion for writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to article
11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure

. See T EX
. C ODE C RIM
. P ROC

. A NN
. art. 11.07, § 3. Under the exclusive procedure outlined in article 11.07, only the convicting trial court and the
Court of Criminal Appeals have jurisdiction to review the merits of a felony post

- conviction habeas petition; there is no role for the intermediate courts of appeals in the statutory scheme. Id. art. 11.07, § 5 (providing “[a]fter conviction the procedure outl ined in this Act shall be exclusive and any other proceeding shall be void and of no force and effect in discharging the prisoner”). Only the Court of Criminal Appeals has jurisdiction to grant post

- conviction release from confinement for persons with a f elony conviction. Id. art. 11.07, § 3; Hoang v. State , 872 S.W.2d04

- 22

- 00864

- CR

- 2

- 694, 697 (Tex. Crim. App. 1993); In re Stone , 26 S.W.3d 568, 569 (Tex. App.

— Waco 2000, orig. proceeding). The intermediate courts of appeals have no jurisdiction over post

- conviction writs of habeas corpus in felony cases. Bd. of Pardons & Paroles ex rel. Keene v. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Dist

. , 910 S.W.2d 481, 483 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995) (orig. proceed ing); Ex parte Boutire , No. 0 4

- 22

- 004 14

- CR, 20 22 WL 3639514 , at *1 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio Aug. 2 4 , 20 22 ) (mem. op., not designated for publication) ( dismissing appeal for lack of jurisdiction). Accordingly, on January 17, 2023, we ordered appellant to show cause in writing why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. In his response, appellant concedes we do not have jurisdiction over this appeal. Therefore, we dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM
DO NOT PUBLISH
EXHIBIT
23.1
 
 CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
  Board of
Directors
 Sparta
Commercial Services, Inc.
 
 As
independent registered certified public accountants, we hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No.
333-159166) of our report, which includes an explanatory paragraph regarding the
substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern,
dated August 13, 2009 included Sparta Commercial Services, Inc.’s Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended April 30, 2009,
 
 /s/RBSM
LLP
 
 New York,
New York
 August
13, 2009
#### § 750.35 Attorney's fees.

Attorney's fees are limited to 20 percent of any compromise or settlement of an administrative claim, and are limited to 25 percent of any judgment rendered in favor of a plaintiff, or of any settlement accomplished after suit is filed. These amounts are to be paid out of the amount awarded and not in addition to the award. 28 U.S.C. 2678.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 5.0.3

Eastern Division

Charlotte Aguilar

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:12−cv−01655

Honorable Robert M. Dow Jr.

Capital Management Services, LP

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Wednesday, April 18, 2012:

 MINUTE entry before Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr: All matters in controversy

having been settled, the above−entitled cause of action is hereby dismissed without

prejudice and with leave to reinstate on or before May 31, 2012 after which time the

dismissal will become with prejudice if no request to reinstate has been filed. Mailed

notice(tbk, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:12-cv-01655 Document #: 11 Filed: 04/18/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:33
**Exhibit32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report ofDynamic Materials Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period endedSeptember 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the “Report”), I, Richard A. Santa, Vice President and ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 
|   |   | (i)    |   | The  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                |
|--------|--------|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |   |   |                                                                                                                                                   |
|   |   | (ii)   |   | The  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

 

 

October26, 2007

 

 
|   |   | /s/ Richard A. Santa                        |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------|
|   |   | Richard A. Santa                            |
|   |   | Vice President and Chief  Financial Officer |
|   |   | of Dynamic Materials  Corporation           |

 

 

A signed original ofthis written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to DynamicMaterials Corporation and will be retained by Dynamic Materials Corporation andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

 

 

 

 

** **

** **

** **

** **

----

** **
#### *In the Matter of East Sunnyside Civic Association of Irvington*et al., Appellants, v Robert C. Reisman et al., Constituting the Board of Trustees of the Village of Irvington, et al., Respondents. (Proceeding No. 1.) In the Matter of Anthony F. Veteran et al., Appellants, v Robert H. Reisman et al., Constituting the Board of Trustees of the Village of Irving*ton, et al., Respondents. (Proceeding No. 2.)*

*In two proceedings pursuant to*CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent Planning Board of the Village of Irvington approving a final subdivision plat of respondent Baker-Firestone, Inc., petitioners in each proceeding appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered October 27, 1977, which denied their respective applications. Judgment modified, on the law, by adding the following after the provision denying the petitioners’ applications, "on the ground that the issues are moot”. As so modified, judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements. Respondent Baker-Firestone, Inc., did not file the approved plat in the office of the county clerk within the time provided by statute (see Village Law, § 7-728, subds 6, 7). Accordingly, the approval has lapsed. Under these circumstances, the applications of the petitioners must be dismissed, not on the merits, but on the ground that the issues are moot (see *Matter of Adirondack League Club v Board of Black Riv. Regulating Dist.,*301 NY 219; *Matter of*Jordan *848Cemetery Assn. v Cemetery Bd. of State of N. Y., 19 AD2d 540). Hopkins, J. P., Damiani, Rabin and Shapiro, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Venture Catalyst Incorporated (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the year ending June 30, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Kevin P. McIntosh, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
result of operations of the Company.



By:

/s/    KEVIN P. MCINTOSHKevin P. McIntosh Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer




Dated: September 24, 2003
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

In Re Innovatio IP Ventures, LLC, Patent 

Litigation Case No. 1:11-cv-09308 

Judge James F. Holderman 

Magistrate Judge Sidney Schenkier This Document Relates To: 

All Cases 

SUPPLEMENTAL JOINT MOTION TO SEAL CERTAIN TRIAL EXHIBITS 

Pursuant to Local Rule 26.2, Innovatio IP Ventures, LLC (“Innovatio”) and 

Defendants/Declaratory Judgment Plaintiffs in the above captioned-matter, including all 

represented by the undersigned (collectively “Defendants”) hereby move the Court for entry of 

the Proposed Order (included as Exhibit A) sealing one additional trial exhibit (DTX 2065) 

utilized during the recent hearing concerning RAND. 

In addition to the Trial Exhibits listed in the parties’ Joint Motion to Seal Portions of the 

Trial Transcript and Certain Trial Exhibits filed on September 26, 2013 (Dkt. No. 962), the 

parties propose to seal DTX 2065, which was inadvertently not included in the original list of 

exhibits to be sealed in Dkt. No. 962. 

The parties respectfully request that the Court enter the attached proposed order, which 

seals DTX 2065. 

 

Case: 1:11-cv-09308 Document #: 973 Filed: 10/02/13 Page 1 of 4 PageID #:41537
 2 

October 2, 2013 Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ Conor Civins 

Barry K. Shelton 

barry.shelton@bgllp.com

Conor M. Civins 

conor.civins@bgllp.com

BRACEWELL & GIULIANI LLP 

111 Congress Avenue, Suite 2300 

Austin, Texas 78701 

Telephone: (512) 472-7800 

Facsimile: (512) 472-9123 

Anthony Nimmo 

anthony.nimmo@icemiller.com

ICE MILLER LLP 

200 W. Madison Street, Suite 3500 

Chicago, IL 60606-3417 

Telephone: (312) 726-1567 

Facsimile: (312) 726-7102 

Counsel for Hewlett-Packard Company

/s/ Matthew G. McAndrews 

Matthew G. McAndrews 

Raymond P. Niro, Jr. 

Brian E. Haan 

Gabriel I. Opatken 

NIRO, HALLER & NIRO 

181 West Madison St., Suite 4600 

Chicago, Illinois 60602 

Telephone: (312) 236-0733 

E-mail: mmcandrews@nshn.com 

E-mail: rnirojr@nshn.com 

E-mail: bhaan@nshn.com 

E-mail: gopatken@nshn.com

 

Case: 1:11-cv-09308 Document #: 973 Filed: 10/02/13 Page 2 of 4 PageID #:41538
 3 

Jean D. Kuelper 

Gregory C. Schodde 

Peter J. McAndrews 

Ronald H. Spuhler 

Shawn L. Peterson 

McANDREWS, HELD & MALLOY, LTD.500 

West Madison St., Suite 3400 

Chicago, Illinois 60661 

Telephone: (312) 775-8000 

E-mail: jkuelper@mcandrews-ip.com 

E-mail: gschodde@mcandrews-ip.com 

E-mail: pmcandrews@mcandrews-ip.com 

E-mail: rspuhler@mcandrews-ip.com 

E-mail: speterson@mcandrews-ip.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiff, 

INNOVATIO IP VENTURES, LLC

Case: 1:11-cv-09308 Document #: 973 Filed: 10/02/13 Page 3 of 4 PageID #:41539
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that on October 2, 2013 a true and correct copy of the foregoing 

SUPPLEMENTAL JOINT MOTION TO SEAL CERTAIN TRIAL EXHIBITS was 

electronically filed with the Court via the CM/ECF system which sent notification of such filing 

to all Counsel of Record. 

Dated: October 2, 2013 /s/ Conor Civins 

Conor Civins

Case: 1:11-cv-09308 Document #: 973 Filed: 10/02/13 Page 4 of 4 PageID #:41540
1852.227-19 Commercial computer software—Restricted rights (JUL 1997). ( a ) As prescribed in 1827.409(k)(i), add the following paragraph (e) to the basic clause at FAR 52.227-19: (e) For the purposes of receiving updates, correction notices, consultation information, or other similar information regarding any computer software delivered under this contract/purchase order, the NASA Contracting Officer or the NASA Contracting Officer's Technical Representative/User may sign any vendor supplied agreements, registration forms, or cards and return them directly to the vendor; however, such signing shall not alter any of the rights or obligations of either NASA or the vendor set forth in this clause or elsewhere in this contract/purchase order.
(End of addition)
( b ) As prescribed in 1827.409(k)(ii), add the following paragraph (f) to the basic clause at FAR 52.227-19:
(f) Subject to paragraphs (a) through (e) above, those applicable portions of the Contractor's standard commercial license or lease agreement pertaining to any computer software delivered under this purchase order/contract that are consistent with Federal laws, standard industry practices, and the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) shall be incorporated into and made part of this purchase order/contract.
(End of addition) [55 FR 27090, June 29, 1990, as amended at 55 FR 47480, Nov. 14, 1990; 55 FR 53153, Dec. 27, 1990; 62 FR 36734, July 9, 1997]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6,1

Eastern Division

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:12−cr−00109

Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman

Heon Seok Lee

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Wednesday, April 6, 2016:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman: as to Heon Seok

Lee; Status hearing held on 4/6/2016. Defendant's request to appear at the Korean

consulate is granted only while defendant is in the company of his attorney. He is not to

go there alone. Pretrial Services shall be advised of the date that defendant is scheduled to

go to the Korean consulate. Defendant granted leave to obtain translation of Korean

documents at a cost of not more than $500.00. Defense counsel's is granted leave to move

for interim fees. Pretrial order in the form of a statement of the case, witness lists, case

exhibits, as well as motions in limine due by 5/13/2016. Responses due by 5/18/2016.

Pretrial Conference set for 5/23/2016 at 01:30 PM. Time continues to be excluded to

6/1/2016 pursuant to 18:3161(h)(7)(B)(i).Mailed notice Mailed notice (rth, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:12-cr-00109 Document #: 60 Filed: 04/06/16 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:219
#### 1336.203 Government estimate of construction costs.

After award, the independent Government estimated price can be released, upon request, to those firms or individuals who submitted proposals.
### §511r. Repealed. Pub. L. 108–357, title VI, §611(b), Oct. 22, 2004, 118 Stat. 1522

Section, Pub. L. 98–180, title II, §213, Nov. 29, 1983, 97 Stat. 1149; Pub. L. 99–198, title XI, §§1161, 1166, Dec. 23, 1985, 99 Stat. 1498, 1501; Pub. L. 100–418, title I, §1214(b), Aug. 23, 1988, 102 Stat. 1156; Pub. L. 101–508, title I, §1204(c), Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1388–11; Pub. L. 101–624, title XXV, §2511, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 4073; Pub. L. 103–66, title I, §1106(c), Aug. 10, 1993, 107 Stat. 323, related to inspection of imported tobacco.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal applicable to the 2005 and subsequent crops of tobacco, see section 643 of Pub. L. 108–357, set out as an Effective Date note under section 518 of this title.

#### Savings Provision

Repeal not to affect the liability of any person under this section with respect to the 2004 or an earlier crop of tobacco, see section 614 of Pub. L. 108–357, set out as a note under section 515 of this title.
#### Lee M. Rounds, Appellant, v. Charles R. Blackstone & Sons, Inc., Respondent.

Order affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. All concur, except Halpern, J., not participating. (Appeal from order of Oneida County Court denying plaintiff’s motion to strike out defendant’s answer and for summary judgment.) Present — Bastow, J. P., Goldman, Halpern, McClusky and Henry, JJ.