alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### (A) Jason Minnick et al., Copartners Doing Business as Fort Orange Realty, Plaintiffs, v. John Quadrini, Defendant. (B) Irmgard A. Rega et al., Respondents, v. Paul Farley, Appellant. (C) In the Matter of the Estate of Anna D. Slover, Deceased. (D) Tibbetts Contracting Corporation, Plaintiff, v. Howard R. Davis et al., Defendants. (E) In the Matter of the Claim of James Blue, Appellant. Martin P. Catherwood, as Industrial Commissioner, Respondent. (F) In the Matter of the Claim of Max Feldman, Appellant. Martin P. Catherwood, as Industrial Commissioner, Respondent. (G) In *860the Matter of the Claim of Jacob Fischer, Appellant. Martin P. Catherwood, as Industrial Commissioner, Respondent. (H) In the Matter of the Claim of Bessie Goudis, Appellant. Martin P. Catherwood, as Industrial Commissioner, Respondent. (I) In the Matter of the Claim of Carmela M. Grippo, Appellant. Martin P. Catherwood, as Industrial Commissioner, Respondent. (J) In the Matter of the Claim of Charlotte Moses, Appellant. Martin P. Catherwood, as Industrial Commissioner, Respondent. (K) In the Matter of the Claim of Celia Ojeda, Appellant. Martin P. Catherwood, as Industrial Commissioner, Respondent. (L) In the Matter of the Claim of Louis Poio, Appellant. Martin P. Catherwood, as Industrial Commissioner, Respondent. (M) In the Matter of the Claim of Patricia Rowe, Appellant. Martin P. Catherwood, as Industrial Commissioner, Respondent. (N) In the Matter of the Claim of Samuel Zimmerman, Appellant. Martin P. Catherwood, as Industrial Commissioner, Respondent. (O) Evelyn A. Saul, Appellant, v. New York Life Insurance Company, Respondent. (P) William Gingeresky, Plaintiff, v. Gifford-Wood Company et al., Defendants. General Erectors, Inc., Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff, v. Behr-Manning Company, Third-Party Defendant. (Q) William Gingeresky, Plaintiff, v. Gifford-Wood Company et al., Defendants. Gifford-Wood Company, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff, v. Norton Company, Third-Party Defendant. (R) In the Matter of Charles Magaraci, Respondent, v. Sarah G. Magaraci, Appellant. (S) National Bank and Trust Company of Norwich, Respondent, v. Morris Newmark, Appellant, et al., Defendants. (T) Morris Newmark, as Trustee, Appellant, v. National Bank and Trust Company of Norwich et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants. (U) Vincent J. Gaffney, Plaintiff, v. New York, New Haven and Hartford Railroad Company, Defendant. (V) Sherman B. Kent et al., Respondents, v. Patricia Groppuso et al., Doing Business as P. and M. Manufacturing Co., et al., Appellants. (W) Clarita Nabozny, Respondent, v. William J. Raulen, Appellant.

[In each action] Appeal [s] dismissed, without costs, unless appellantfs] shall file and serve record, brief and note of issue on or before February 13, 1961 and is [are] ready for argument at the term to commence March 13, 19-61, in which event the motion is denied.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

MIKE SHALES, et al., )

)

Plaintiffs, ) CIVIL ACTION

)

v. ) NO. 12 C 0942

)

VIRIDIAN ENTERPRISES, INC., ) JUDGE ROBERT M. DOW, JR.

an Illinois corporation, )

)

Defendant. )

MOTION FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT AND JUDGMENT

NOWCOME Plaintiffs, bytheir attorneys, and move for entryof judgment by default against

Defendant, VIRIDIAN ENTERPRISES, INC., an Illinois corporation, in the total amount of

$101,484.26, plus Plaintiffs’ court costs and reasonable attorneys’ fees in the amount of $1,874.50.

On February 26, 2012, the Summons and Complaint wasserved on the Registered Agent by

tendering a copy of said documents to him personally at his residence/place of business (a copy of

the Summons and Affidavit of Service is attached hereto). Therefore, Defendant’s answer was due

on March 19, 2012. As Defendant has failed to timely answer the Complaint, Plaintiffs respectfully

request entry of default and judgment.

/s/ Catherine M. Chapman 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned, an attorney of record, hereby certifies that she electronically filed the

foregoing document (Motion for Entry of Default and Judgment) with the Clerk of Court using the

CM/ECF system, and further certifies that I have mailed the above-referenced document by United

States Mail to the following non-CM/ECF participant on or before the hour of 5:00 p.m. this 8th day

of May 2012:

Mr. Pedro Cervantes

Tristan & Cervantes

30 West Monroe, Suite 630

Chicago, IL 60603

/s/ Catherine M. Chapman 

Catherine M. Chapman

Attorney for Plaintiffs

BAUM SIGMAN AUERBACH & NEUMAN, LTD.

200 West Adams Street, Suite 2200

Chicago, IL 60606-5231

Bar No.: 6204026

Telephone: (312) 236-4316

Facsimile: (312) 236-0241

E-Mail: cchapman@baumsigman.com

I:\FVLJ\Viridian Enterprises\motion 2.cmc.df.wpd
§ 767.21 Hearings. ( a ) Hearings before a DOHA Administrative Judge are *de novo* reviews of the circumstances alleged in the NOVA and penalties assessed. Hearings are governed by procedures established by the Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals. Hearing procedures will be provided in writing to the parties and may be accessed on-line at *http://www.dod.mil/dodgc/doha/ .* Hearings shall be held at the Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals, Arlington VA, either in person or by video teleconference. Each party shall bear their own costs.
( b ) In any DOHA hearing held in response to a request under § 767.20(f), the Administrative Judge will render a final written Decision which is binding on all parties.
# FFEL_Volume

# Quarterly

# Historical
(October 13, 1960)

#### In the Matter of Robert Bernard Levin, an Attorney.

Respondent reinstated to the Bar. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin and Yalente, JJ.
FAA Home
Regulations & Policies
Advisory Circulars (ACs)

# AC 00-31A - United States (U.S.) National Aviation Standard for the Very High Frequency Omnidirectional Radio Range (VOR)/Distance Measuring Equipment (DME)/Tactical Air Navigation (TACAN) Systems

- ShareShare
- 

- Facebook					Share on Facebook
- Twitter					Tweet on Twitter

## Document Information

- Number
- 00-31A
- Title
- United States   (U.S.) National Aviation Standard for the Very High Frequency Omnidirectional Radio Range   (VOR)/Distance Measuring Equipment   (DME)/Tactical Air Navigation   (TACAN) Systems
- Status
- Active
- Date issued
- 1982-09-20
- Office of Primary Responsibility
- AJW-143, Navigation & Landing Systems Team 
- Description
-  	This Advisory Circular is issued to inform the aviation community of the establishment and content of the United States(U. S.) National Aviation Standard for the Very High Frequency Omnidirectional Radio Range (VOR)/Distance Measuring Equipment (DME)/Tactical Air Navigation (TACAN) Systems 
- Content
-    -  AC 00-31A  (PDF) 

## View All

      - Current ACs
      - Cancelled ACs
      - Series 150 ACs
      - Draft Series 150 ACs

## Export All

      - Current ACs  (CSV)
      - Cancelled ACs  (CSV)

## Contact Information

      - Advisory Circulars Administrator
      - Other Points of Contact  (MS Excel)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS, EASTERN DIVISION 

SONIA FALK ) No. 12-C-1384 

 ) 

 Plaintiff, ) Judge Ruben Castillo 

) 

 v. ) 

) 

KANE COUNTY SHERRIFF, et. al. ) 

) 

 Defendants. ) JURY TRIAL DEMANDED 

MOTION FOR JUDGMENT OF DAMAGES

 NOW COMES Plaintiff, Sonia Falk, moving for a Judgment of Damages under 

F.R.Civ.P. Rule 55 against Defendant Wells Fargo Bank. In support thereof, Plaintiff states as 

follows: 

1. The Complaint (Dkt. 1) and Summons (Dkt. 47) were served via certified mail 

and signed for by Tom Jarvis on February 4, 2013. Default Judgment was entered against Wells 

Fargo Bank on Counts III, IV, V, VI, and VII on March 7, 2013. (Dkt. 51.) Pursuant to 

F.R.Civ.P. 55(b), Plaintiff submits her Declaration in support of her damages. (Ex. A, Falk 

Declaration.) 

2. As stated in her Declaration, Plaintiff’s damages which stem from Wells Fargo 

Bank’s unlawful conduct total $150,000.00. This amount does not represent the total amount that 

Plaintiff would seek at trial. Plaintiff will attest to her affidavit in Court. 

 WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully requests that this Honorable Court grant Plaintiff’s 

Motion for Judgment of Damages. 

 

 

Case: 1:12-cv-01384 Document #: 60 Filed: 06/28/13 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:204
2 

 RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, 

 

 /s/ Christopher R. Smith 

 Attorney for Plaintiff 

Christopher Smith 

Robert Johnson 

Amanda Antholt 

James Baranyk 

Smith, Johnson & Antholt LLC 

1 N. LaSalle, Suite 3040 

Chicago, IL 60602 

312.432.0400 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

 The undersigned attorney hereby certifies that the foregoing Motion for Judgment of 

Damages was served on counsel for all Defendants by electronic means on June 28, 2013, and to 

Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, by certified mail. 

 /s/ Christopher R. Smith 

 Attorney for Plaintiff 

Case: 1:12-cv-01384 Document #: 60 Filed: 06/28/13 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:205
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2001             JUN-30-2001
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-2000             DEC-31-2000
<CASH>                                               0                 317,364
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0                 206,432
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                  14,323
<INVENTORY>                                          0                 159,613
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0                 671,803
<PP&E>                                               0               1,073,088
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                 876,863
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0                 868,028
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0                 106,540
<BONDS>                                              0                  73,351
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0               2,361,440
<COMMON>                                             0                 969,834
<OTHER-SE>                                           0             (2,643,137)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0                 868,028
<SALES>                                      1,040,830               1,493,783
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,041,228               1,495,017
<CGS>                                          746,855               1,095,964
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  882,318               1,334,946
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,605                   3,210
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,915                   3,830
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                155,390                 153,031
<INCOME-TAX>                                    48,481                  48,011
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            106,909                 105,020
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   106,909                 105,020
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .08                     .04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0


</TABLE>
1830.7002-2 Cost of money calculations. ( a ) The interest rate referenced in 1830.7002-1(a)(1) is established semi-annually and published in the Federal Register during the fourth week of December and June.
( b ) To calculate the time-weighted average interest rate referenced in 1830.7002-1(a)(2), multiply the rates in effect during the months of construction by the number of months each rate was in effect, and then divide the sum of the products by the total number of months.
### §8505. Treatment of brown tree snakes as nonmailable matter

A brown tree snake constitutes nonmailable matter under section 3015 of title 39.

(Pub. L. 108–384, §6, Oct. 30, 2004, 118 Stat. 2224.)
#### The People of the State of New York v. Lewis Moore.

Motion for leave to dispense with printing granted to the extent and on the terms and conditions contained in the order of this court filed herein. Concur — Botein, P. J., Stevens, Eager, Steuer and Bergan, JJ.
### SERVE D NOVEMBE

R30 , 201 0 DEPARTMEN TO F

i-\NSPORWIO N "•<E TOPERATION S

• J ' ' 

### m1 0 P2

- 3 5

U.S . DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N

OFFIC EO FHEARING S WASHINGTON , D C I NTH EMATTE RO F FLIGHTSTA RAIRCRAF T SERVICES , INC . FA A DOCKE T No . CPlOGLOO l 1 (Civi l Penalt y Action ) DM S No . FAA-2010-107 5 ORDE R DENYIN G MOTIO N T O DISMIS S Responden t Flightsta rAircraf t Services , Inc . ("Respondent" ) ha s move d t o dismis s tli e Complain t o f tli e Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n ("Complainant " o r"agency" ) o n th e ground s tha t i t wa s file d ou t o f time . Sectio n 13.208(d ) o f th e Rule s o f Practic e i n FA ACivi l Penalt yActions , 1 4 C.F.R . §13.20 1 e t seq. , permit s a responden t t o mov e t o dismis s a complain t a s stal e i f th e violation s allege d occurre d mor e tha n tw o year s prio rt o th e agency' s Notic e o f Propose d Civi l Penalt y("NPCP") . Complainan t oppose s th e motion . Th e ac t complaine d o f occurre d o n Ma y6 , 2008 , an d th e NPC P was issue d slightl ymor e tha n eleve n month s later , o n Apri l 7 , 2009 . Therefore , Complainan t concludes , th e Complain t mayno t b e dismisse d unde rth e stale-complain t rule .Complainan t i s correct . Respondent' s motio n i s utterl ywithou t basi s

an d i s DENIED. ^

Attachmen t - Servic e Lis t Richar d C . Goodwi n Administrativ e La

wJudg e

' Se e als o Hig hExposure . Inc. , FA

A Orde r No . 2003- 7 (Septembe

r 12 , 2003) , p . 8 . /FA ADocke t No . CPlOGLOOl 1 (Civi l Penalty Action ) SERVIC ELIS T ORIGINA L& ON ECOP Y Federal Aviatio nAdministratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W . Washington , D C 2059 1 Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC-430 , Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit e 2W1000 '

ON ECOP Y Gregory S . Winton , Respondent' s Counse l Th e Aviatio nLa w Firm On e Researc hCourt , Suit e 45 0 Rockville , M D 2085 0 TEL : 301-294-855 0 FAX : 301-294-252 5 Glen nL . Brown , Complainant' s Counse l Senio r Attorney , Offic e o f

th e Regiona l Counse l Great Lake s Region , AGL- 7 Federal Aviatio nAdministratio n 230 0 Eas t Devo nAvenu e DesPlaines,I L6001 8 TEL : 847-294-706 3 FAX : 847-294-749 8 Th e Honorabl e Richar dC . Goodwin , Administrativ e Law Judg e U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportatio n Offic e o f Hearings , M-20 , 120 0 New Jerse y Avenue , S.E . Eas t Building , Groun dFloor , Roo mEl2-32 0 Washington , D C 2059 0 TEL : Attorney-Adviso r 202-366-213 9 Legal Assistan t

202-366-512 1 FAX : 202-366-753 6

' Service wa

s b y U.S . Mai LFo r servic e i npersono r b y expeditedcourier , us e the followin g address : Federa

l Aviatio nAdministration , 600 Independenc e Avenue , S.W. , Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit

e 2W1000 , Washington , D C 20591 ; Attention : Hearm g Docke t Clerk, AGC-430 .
# TEACH Grant - 2010-11
Exhibit 32.2

BRIGGS & STRATTON CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

Form 10-Q for Quarterly Period Ended March 29,
2009

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Briggs & Stratton Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
March 29, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James E. Brenn, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to
§906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ James E. Brenn     
|James E. Brenn         
|Chief Financial Officer
|May 6, 2009            

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### 1552.224-70 Social security numbers of consultants and certain sole proprietors and Privacy Act statement.

As prescribed in 1524.104, insert the following provision in all solicitations.

# Social Security Numbers of Consultants and Certain Sole Proprietors and Privacy Act Statement (APR 1984)

(a) Section 6041 of title 26 of the U.S. Code requires EPA to file Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Form 1099 with respect to individuals who receive payments from EPA under purchase orders or contracts. Section 6109 of title 26 of the U.S. Code authorizes collection by EPA of the social security numbers of such individuals for the purpose of filing IRS Form 1099. Social security numbers obtained for this purpose will be used by EPA for the sole purpose of filing IRS Form 1099 in compliance with section 6041 of title 26 of the U.S. Code.

(b) If the offeror or quoter is an individual, consultant, or sole proprietor and has no Employer Identification Number, insert the offeror's or quoter's social security number on the following line.

(End of provision)
### §401. Definitions

In this chapter:

(1) Predispute arbitration agreement.—The term "predispute arbitration agreement" means any agreement to arbitrate a dispute that had not yet arisen at the time of the making of the agreement.

(2) Predispute joint-action waiver.—The term "predispute joint-action waiver" means an agreement, whether or not part of a predispute arbitration agreement, that would prohibit, or waive the right of, one of the parties to the agreement to participate in a joint, class, or collective action in a judicial, arbitral, administrative, or other forum, concerning a dispute that has not yet arisen at the time of the making of the agreement.

(3) Sexual assault dispute.—The term "sexual assault dispute" means a dispute involving a nonconsensual sexual act or sexual contact, as such terms are defined in section 2246 of title 18 or similar applicable Tribal or State law, including when the victim lacks capacity to consent.

(4) Sexual harassment dispute.—The term "sexual harassment dispute" means a dispute relating to conduct that is alleged to constitute sexual harassment under applicable Federal, Tribal, or State law.

(Added Pub. L. 117–90, §2(a), Mar. 3, 2022, 136 Stat. 26.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Pub. L. 117–90, §3, Mar. 3, 2022, 136 Stat. 28, provided that: "This Act [see Short Title of 2022 Amendment note set out under section 1 of this title], and the amendments made by this Act, shall apply with respect to any dispute or claim that arises or accrues on or after the date of enactment of this Act [Mar. 3, 2022]."
Exhibit
23(b)
 
 
 
 Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
 
 
 We
consent to the incorporation by reference in PPL Energy Supply, LLC’s
Registration Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-128219, 333-116477, 333-106200,
333-106200-01, 333-132574, 333-132574-01, 333-132574-02, and 333-132574-03) of
our report dated February 28, 2008, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements and schedule of PPL Energy Supply, LLC, included in this Annual
Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2007.
 
 
 
 Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania
 February
28, 2008
#### Board of Police Commissioners of the City of New Haven et al. *v.*Connecticut Board of Mediation and Arbitration et al.

*Arnold J. Bai,*in support of the motion.

*Horace F. Trotta,*in support of the motion.

*Arnold J. Bai,*in support of the motion.

The named plaintiff’s motion dated October 21,1974, for a review of the trial court’s order denying the plaintiff’s motion to stay dated October 9, 1974, in the appeal from the Superior Court in New Haven County is dismissed.

The motion by the plaintiff city of New Haven dated October 30, 1974, for a review of the trial court’s order denying the plaintiff’s motion to stay dated October 9, 1974, in the appeal from the Superior Court in New Haven County is dismissed.

The motion by the named plaintiff dated October 21, 1974, in the appeal from the Superior Court in New Haven County for an order to stay the defendants’ arbitration proceedings is dismissed.

*672
      *Horace F. Trotta,*in support of the motion.

Submitted November 1

decided November 26, 1974

The motion hy the plaintiff city of New Haven dated October 30,1974, in the appeal from the Superior Court in New Haven County for an order to stay the defendants’ arbitration proceedings is dismissed.
#### In the Matter of Melvyn Lippman, Petitioner. Brooklyn Bar Association, Respondent.

Application by a former attorney to be reinstated as a member of the Bar denied. Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Brennan and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
#### 1852.216-83 Fixed price incentive.

As prescribed in 1816.406-70(c), insert the following clause:

# Fixed Price Incentive (OCT 1996)

The target cost of this contract is $______. The Target profit of this contract is $______. The target price (target cost plus target profit) of this contract is $______. [The ceiling price is $______.]

The cost sharing for target cost underruns is: Government ____ percent; Contractor ____ percent.

The cost sharing for target cost overruns is: Government ____ percent; Contractor ____ percent.

(End of clause)

[62 FR 3486, Jan. 23, 1997, as amended at 62 FR 36733, July 9, 1997]
203.070 Reporting of violations and suspected violations. Report violations and suspected violations of the following requirements in accordance with 209.406-3 or 209.407-3 and DoDD 7050.5, Coordination of Remedies for Fraud and Corruption Related to Procurement Activities: ( a ) Certificate of Independent Price Determination (FAR 3.103).
( b ) Procurement integrity (FAR 3.104).
( c ) Gratuities clause (FAR 3.203).
( d ) Antitrust laws (FAR 3.303).
( e ) Covenant Against Contingent Fees (FAR 3.405).
( f ) Kickbacks (FAR 3.502).
( g ) Prohibitions on persons convicted of defense-related contract felonies (203.570).
[69 FR 74990, Dec. 15, 2004, as amended at 77 FR 35879, June 15, 2012]