### CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD

.A, 

### APCDIAQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM 

# - Page 1
District: South Coast Air Quality Management District Rule No: 2181218.1 Date AmendedJAdopted: May 14, 1999 Rule Title: Continuous Emission Monitoring 1Continuous Emission Monitoring Performance Specifications Date Submitted to 

### ARB: If an Amended Rule, Date Last Amended :August 7, 1981 (Rule 218) Isthe Rule Intended to be Sent to the U.S. EPA as a SIP Revision ( )Yes (x) No IfNO, do not complete remainder of form.

District Contact: John Higuchi Phone Number: (909) 396-2267 Narrative Summary ofNew Rule or Rule Changes: (x) Amended Rule: Rule 218 deletes obsolete language, clarifies administrative requirements, provides flexibility, deletes the stack monitoring svstem performance specifications and revises the rule title from Stack Monitoring to Continuous Emission Monitoring. (x) New Rule :Rule 218.1 incorporatesthe continuous emission monitoring system performance specifications. as well as revise and identifies performance specifications to meet AQMD requirements for apvroval. Pollutant(s) Regulated by the Rule (Circle): ROG NOx SO2 CO TAC(name)

A.~ 

## n. EFFECT ON 

### EMISSIONS Complete this section ONLY for rules that, when implemented, will result in quantifiable changes in emissions. Attach reference(s) for emission factor(s) and other information. Attach calculation sheet showing how the emission information provided below was determined. Net Effect on Emissions: ( )Increase ( ) Decrease ( )NIA Emission Reduction Commitment in SIP for this Source Category: tonslyear SCCICES Code Affected: Ifa SCC Code is Assigned, SIC Code Affected: (NOTE: If more than one SCC or CES code or more than one combination of SCC and SIC codes are needed, fill out the following information on a separate form for each combination of codes.) Inventory Year Used to Calculate Changes in Emissions: Area Affected: Future Year Control Profile Estimate (Provide information on as many years as possible)

### Reductions TonsNear Control Percent Control Control Year (Increases) Subiectto Rule Level Control Level Factor TonsNear Baseline



### -

### CALIFORNIA

### AIR RESOURCES BOARD

w,w APCDIAQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM

# - Page 

### 3
III. SOURCESIATTAINMENTSTATUS District is: ( )Attainment ( )Nonattainment ( ) Split Approximate Total Number of Small (400TPY) Sources Controlled by Rule: Percent in Nonattainment Area: 

### Yo Number ofLarge (1TPY) SourcesControlled: Percent in Nonattainment Area: 

### YO Name(s) and Location(s) (city and county) ofLarge (1 100TPY) Sources Controlled by Rule (Attach additional sheets as necessary): Facilitv Name Fac. ID Location City Countv Name



### IV. EMISSION REDUCTION TECHNOLOGY Does the Rule Include Emission Limits that are Continuous? ( ) Yes ( )No If Yes, Those Limits are in Section(s) of the Rule.



## . '*_ Other Methods in the Rule for Achieving Emission Reductions are:

V. OTHERREOUIREMENTS The Rule Contains: Emission Limits in Section(s): Work Practice Standards in Section(s): Recordkeeping Requirements in Section(s): Reporting Requirements in Section(s): Attach a Completed EPA SIPApvrovabilitv Checklist

## - Enforceability or Provide an Equivalent Compliance/Enforcement Strategy Statement.


### VI. IMPACT ON AIR QUALITY PLAN 

### (x) No Impact ( ) Impacts 

### RFP ( ) Impacts attainment Discussion:

d.- (ARBFORM 

## - 6/93)