alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<CIK> 0000032379
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      610,035
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                      7,057
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                          42,105
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                        29,912
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 689,109
<COMMON>                                        15,741
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      134,335
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                             60,305
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 210,381
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           12,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           245,151
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                              20,000
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                       30
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 198,230
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  685,792
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                       31,066
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                             2,189
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      20,860
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      23,049
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                          8,017
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                 131
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                   8,148
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         3,865
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,283
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        203
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                    4,080
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                         4,339
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                        3,757
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                          11,586
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

October 5, 2021

No. 04-19-00737-CR, 04-19-00738-CR

Aidan VITELA,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 451st Judicial District Court, Kendall County, Texas

Trial Court No. 5942, 6023

Honorable Kirsten Cohoon, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

On September 29, 2021, this court issued its opinion and judgment in this appeal. On 

September 30, 2021, Appellant timely filed a motion for a sixteen-day extension of time to file a 

motion for rehearing. See TEX. R. APP. P. 49.1, 49.8. 

Appellant’s motion for extension of time is GRANTED. Appellant’s motion for 

rehearing is due on November 1, 2021. 

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 5th day of October, 2021.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court

FILE COPY
### §1736dd. International food security technical assistance

#### (a) Definition of international food security

In this section, the term "international food security" means access by any person at any time to food and nutrition that is sufficient for a healthy and productive life.

#### (b) Collection of information

The Secretary of Agriculture (referred to in this section as the "Secretary") shall compile information from appropriate mission areas of the Department of Agriculture (including the Food, Nutrition, and Consumer Services mission area) relating to the improvement of international food security.

#### (c) Public availability

To benefit programs for the improvement of international food security, the Secretary shall organize the information described in subsection (b) and make the information available in a format suitable for—

(1) public education; and

(2) use by—

(A) a Federal, State, or local agency;

(B) an agency or instrumentality of the government of a foreign country;

(C) a domestic or international organization, including a domestic or international nongovernmental organization; and

(D) an intergovernmental organization.

#### (d) Technical assistance

On request by an entity described in subsection (c)(2), the Secretary may provide technical assistance to the entity to implement a program for the improvement of international food security.

#### (e) Program priority

In carrying out this section, the Secretary shall give priority to programs relating to the development of food and nutrition safety net systems with a focus on food insecure countries.

#### (f) Authorization of appropriations

There is authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section $1,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2019 through 2023.

(Pub. L. 101–624, title XV, §1543B, as added Pub. L. 115–334, title III, §3308, Dec. 20, 2018, 132 Stat. 4621.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Food, Agriculture, Conservation, and Trade Act of 1990, and not as part of the Food for Peace Act which comprises this chapter.
Subject: FWD: Gainful Employment Data ana lysis questions for ED 

From: Sandra Kinney <sandra.kinney@ > 

Date: Tue, Sep 10,2013 at 9:50AM 

Subject: Gainful Employment Data analysis questions for ED 

To: Chip Cameron < @ > 

Regarding the data used for analysis to determine the debt to earnings ratio, 

1. Does the data used for the draft charts on data analysis include just borrowers or does it include all Title IV 

students as is being proposed? It says borrowers in the charts but I want to be sure. 

2. Why are approximately 250 associate degree programs showing at Community College systems? 

3. The total number of programs in the dataset is greater than the covered programs that show in Power 

Point. Which number is correct? 

4. When determining the Debt to Income ratio for programs, are you looking at the last program of study that 

the student was enrolled in to determine the program that is affected or is it spread out amongst all the programs 

the student was enrolled in during his/her tenure at the school? If allocated across programs, please explain the 

methodology in more detail. 

Thanks. 

SanJra Kinne) 

Vtce Pres1den, of lnstiL1t ona Research and Planning 

.ouisiana Corr nu'lity am: rcch'1ical Col q;c ')ystc·n 

1
.UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) No. 12 CR 172-2

) Judge Robert M. Dow, Jr.

 CHADIA ABUEID )

UNITED STATES BILL OF PARTICULARS

FOR FORFEITURE OF CERTAIN PROPERTY

The UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, by PATRICK J. FITZGERALD, United States

Attorney for the Northern District of Illinois, hereby files the following Bill of Particulars.

Through a violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 2342(a), as alleged in the

indictment, the United States seeks forfeiture of all property constituting and derived from, and

traceable to, proceeds obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the Chadia Abueid’s violations,

including, but not limited to United States currency in the amount of $10,230 seized from Abueid

on or about March 14, 2012. 

All pursuant to the provisions of 18 U.S.C. § 981(a)(1)(C) and 18 U.S.C. § 2461(c).

Respectfully submitted,

PATRICK J. FITZGERALD

United States Attorney

 By: /s Christopher Grohman 

 CHRISTOPHER GROHMAN

 Assistant United States Attorney

 219 South Dearborn Street

 Chicago, Illinois 60604

June 28, 2012

Case: 1:12-cr-00172 Document #: 37 Filed: 06/28/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:99
2015.303 Responsibilities. ( a ) The source selection authority is the contracting officer. The contracting officer, acting as the source selection authority, shall select an offer for award based on review of the Source Evaluation Panel's recommendation contained in the reports described in paragraph (c) of this section.
( b ) Any cancellation of solicitations and subsequent rejection of all proposals must be approved by the Head of the Contracting Activity.
( c ) For all proposed contracts with total estimated values in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold and expected to result from competitive technical and price/cost negotiations, the cooperative review efforts of technical, contracting, and other administrative personnel are formalized through establishment of a Source Evaluation Panel. A single technical member may be appointed to the Source Evaluation Panel to evaluate proposals with the contracting officer's approval. In these instances, the Designating Official may appoint technical advisors (non-voting members) to assist the single technical member. The Source Evaluation Panel should not exceed five members, including the Chairperson except in unusual cases. The Source Evaluation Panel's proposal evaluation report(s) may include a Competitive Range Report and a Final Evaluation Report (to be used when award will be made after conducting discussions), or a Recommendation for Award Report (to be used when award will be made without discussions).
( d ) The Designating Official (Office Director or designee) is responsible for appointing a Source Evaluation Panel to evaluate competitive technical proposals in accordance with the solicitation technical criteria. The Designating Official is also responsible for conducting an independent review and evaluation of the Source Evaluation Panel's proposal evaluation report(s) to the contracting officer.
#### 1901.601 General.

The Director, Office of Contracts, is designated the Board Procurement Executive. The Board Procurement Executive is delegated the full delegable authority of the Director of this Board with respect to the acquisition of goods and services by contract and such other methods as may be prescribed in the FAR. The Board Procurement Executive is delegated overall responsibility by the Director for the Board's contracting activities.
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 23-1503

___________________________

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee

v.

Calvertson Johnson Slim

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant

 ____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Western District of Missouri - Springfield

 ____________

 Submitted: January 30, 2024

Filed: February 7, 2024

[Unpublished]

____________

Before BENTON, KELLY, and STRAS, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.

Calvertson Slim, who was civilly committed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 4246 in

2019, appeals the district court’s1

 order revoking his grant of conditional release

1The Honorable M. Douglas Harpool, United States District Judge for the

Western District of Missouri, adopting the report and recommendations of the
under section 4246(f). After careful review of the record and the parties’ arguments

on appeal, we conclude that the district court did not clearly err in finding that Slim

failed to comply with his prescribed regimen of care and that his continued release

would therefore create a substantial risk of bodily injury to another person or serious

damage to property of another. See 18 U.S.C. § 4246(f); United States v. Burleson,

29 Fed. App’x 412, 413 (8th Cir. 2002) (unpublished per curiam) (standard of

review). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

Honorable David P. Rush, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of

Missouri.

-2-
January 7 , 2014



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

ERIC CLAYTON HARPER , Appellant

NO. 14

- 13

- 00700

- CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

________________________________ This cause was heard on appellant ’s request to withdraw his notice of appeal. Having considered the request, the Court orders the appeal DISMISSED

. We fu rther order appellant pay all costs expended in the appeal. We further order the mandate be issued immediately.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
#### 16.205 Fixed-price contracts with prospective price redetermination.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Michael Troyan, Appellant.

Judgment convicting defendant of crime of exposure of person (Penal Law, § 1140) unanimously affirmed. No opinion. Concur — Rabin, J. P., Valente, McNally and Bergan, JJ.
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

                - P-12
                - Carrera Universitaria
                - Educación Para Adultos
                - Derechos Civiles
                - Educación Especial
                - Noticias

----

Kit de Herramientas

Elevar Las Expectativas

Biden-Harris cancelación de deuda

Recursos Para Víctimas de Violencia

Manual COVID-19: Volumen 1Volumen 2

Comunicados de Prensa

Homeroom Blog (Blog del Aula)

Enfermedad del Coronavirus 2019 (COVID‐19) | CDC

Información acerca de Huracanes

La Ley Cada Estudiante Triunfa

Ayuda Federal para Estudiantes

Avisos para medios de comunicación

Gracias por su interés en la educación. En el Departamento de Educación creemos firmemente que todos los niños pueden aprender y que la educación es el camino más seguro hacia la realización de su sueño.

El Departamento de Educación tiene como misión promover el alto rendimiento académico y la preparación de los estudiantes para la competitividad global al fomentar la excelencia en la educación y garantizar la igualdad de acceso.

Cumpliremos con el deseo del presidente de apoyar la reapertura segura y sostenida de las escuelas

De Secretario Cardona: Una carta a padres y estudiantes

Localice su escuela

Localice su distrito escolar

Localice al departamento de educación de su estado

USAGov en Español es la guía oficial de información y servicios del Gobierno

Publicaciones

Centro de Recursos de InformaciónTeléfono 1-800-872-5327 o 202-401-2000Correo electrónico

----

 

 Printable view

## How Do I Find...

          - Student loans, forgiveness
          - Higher Education Rulemaking
          - College accreditation
          - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
          - FERPA
          - FAFSA
          - 1098, tax forms

More >

## Information About...

          - Elevating Teaching
          - Early Learning
          - Engage Every Student
          - Unlocking Career Success
          - Cybersecurity

 

----

*Our mission*

Student Loans
Repaying LoansDefaulted LoansLoan ForgivenessLoan Servicers

Grants & Programs
Apply for Pell GrantsGrants ForecastApply for a Grant

Laws & Guidance
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)FERPACivil RightsNew IDEA Website

Data & Research
Education StatisticsPostsecondary Education DataED Data ExpressNation's Report CardWhat Works ClearinghouseOpen Data PlatformCOVID Relief Data

About Us
Contact UsED OfficesJobsPress ReleasesFAQsRecursos en españolBudget, PerformancePrivacy Program

----

          - Notices
          - FOIA
          - Privacy Policy
          - Accessibility
          - Security
          - Information quality
          - Inspector General
          - Whitehouse.gov
          - USA.gov
          - Benefits.gov
          - Regulations.gov
          - vote.gov
# All Recipients

# Dependent Recipients 

# Indep Recip without Dep 

# Indep Recip with Dep

# All Recipients - Public 

# Dep Recip - Public

# Indep without Dep - Public

# Indep with Dep - Public

# All Recipients - Private

# Dep Recip - Private

# Indep without Dep - Private

# Indep with Dep - Private

# All Recipients - Proprietary

# Dep Recip - Proprietary

# Indep without Dep - Proprietary

# Indep with Dep - Proprietary
#### 2015.304 Evaluation factors.

The evaluation factors included in the solicitation serve as the standard against which all proposals are evaluated and are the basis for the development of proposal preparation instructions in accordance with FAR 15.304(b). The solicitation may indicate the relative importance of evaluation factors and subfactors by assigning a numerical weight to each factor. If a solicitation uses numerical weights, those weights shall be stated in the solicitation. The relative importance of factors that are not numerically weighted will be stated in the solicitation. Examples of factors which may not be numerically weighted are conflict of interest, estimated cost, and “go/no go” evaluation factors.
#### 1536.521 Specifications and drawings for construction.

The Contracting Officer shall insert the clause at 1552.236-70, Samples and Certificates, in soliciations and contracts when a fixed price construction contract is expected to exceed the simplified acquisition threshold limitation. The clause may be inserted in solicitations and contracts when the contract is expected to be within the simplified acquisition threshold limitation.

[49 FR 8863, Mar. 8, 1984, as amended at 81 FR 41237, June 24, 2016]
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Tellabs, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 29, 2006, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Krish A. Prabhu, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to and for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Krish A. Prabhu    
|Krish A. Prabhu        
|Chief Executive Officer
|Date: February 26, 2007

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will
be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
## ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF 

## ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY 1110 West Washington Street • Phoenix, Arizona 85007 (602) 771-2300 • www.azdeq.gov

September6. 2013

Mr. Jared Blumenfeld, Regional Administrator U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX Mail Code ORA-1 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, CA 94105 RE: Final Arizona State Implementation PlanRevision forthe Nogales PM 2

. 5 NonattainmentArea DearMr. Bitimenfeld: Consistent with the provisions ofArizona Revised Statutes 

### § 49-104, 49-106, 49-404, 49-406 and 49- 425 (Enclosurel) and the Code ofFederal Regulations (CFR) Title 40. 

### § 5 1.102 through 5 1.104, the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ) hereby adopts and submits to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) the Ari:ona 

### State Implementation Plan 

### Revision fl.r the NogalesNonattainment

### Area as arevision tothe Arizona State ImplementationPlan (SIP). This SIP revision fulfills outstanding Clean Air Act (CAA) requirements for the Nogales PM 2

. 5 Nonattainment Area following the January 7, 2013 EPA clean data determination under the Clean Data Policy (78 FR 887). The document includes ahistory ofthe Nogales PM 2

. 5 planning area, a description of the area and Santa Cruz County, identification ofClean Air Act requirements for the area, an emissions inventory andotherelements included forfederal review with this submittal. ADEQ requests that EPA approve this revision to the Arizona State Implementation Plan. Enclosure 2 contains the SIP Completeness Checklist; Enclosure 3 contains two hard copies and an electronic exact duplicate of the hard copies on CD: Enclosure 4 includes public hearing documentation for this SIP revision. Sincerely.

Eric )ey, Director Air Qtaity Division
/ // cg 7 Colleen McKaughan. EPARegion IX. w/o enclosures Arturo Garino, Mayor, City ofNogales, w/o enclosures Manuel Ruiz, Chairman, SantaCruz County BoardofSupervisors. w/o enclosures

Southern Regional Office 400 West Congress Street • Suite 433 • Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 628—6733 Janice K. Brewer Covernor Henry R. Darwin Director

Printedon recycledpaper
#### Miltenberg & Samton, Inc., Appellant, v. Winkler Credit Corporation, Respondent.

Order entered on September 29, 1960, granting defendant’s motion to dismiss the second amended complaint, pursuant to rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice, unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondent. The plaintiff may, if it be so advised, serve a further amended complaint not inconsistent with the opinion of the court at Special Term, within 10 days after the service upon its attorneys of a copy of the order entered herein, with notice of entry thereof, upon payment of the said costs and disbursements. No opinion. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, McNally, Stevens and Steuer, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SUMMARY CONTAINS FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS OF BRIDGFORD FOODS CORPORATION FOR THE THIRTEEN WEEKS ENDED JANUARY
28, 2000, AS SET FORTH IN THIS 10-Q FOR SUCH PERIOD, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-03-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-28-2000
<CASH>                                      25,507,239
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               12,301,267
<ALLOWANCES>                                   683,655
<INVENTORY>                                 13,206,682
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            52,933,443
<PP&E>                                      49,537,457
<DEPRECIATION>                              31,462,553
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              81,182,298
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       11,718,017
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    11,059,195
<OTHER-SE>                                  45,295,745
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                56,354,940
<SALES>                                     40,343,872
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            40,343,872
<CGS>                                       24,448,917
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               24,448,917
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            12,038,617
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                35,913
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              65,683
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,856,338
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,465,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,391,338
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,391,338
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.21


</TABLE>