.. 

SIP SUBMITTAL COMPLETENESS CRITERIA CHECKLIST 

(In accordance with 40 CFR Part 51 - App. V) 

SIP Submitted by: V ADepartment of Environmental Quality 

Date Submitted: September 27,2010 

Subject: Revision C08: Permits for Major Stationary Sources and Major Modifications Locating in PSD Areas and Permits for 

Major Stationary Sources and Major Modifications Locating in Nonattainment Areas or the OTR 

Completeness Review 

Completed by: Gerallyn Duke 

Date Completed: March 24, 2011 

Administrative Materials 

r 

EPA REQUIREMENT 

1. A formal letter of submittal from the Governor or his designee, 

Irequesting EP A approval of the plan or revision thereof. 

2. Evidence that the State has adopted the plan in the State code or 

[body of regulations; or issued the permit, order, or consent 

agreement in final form. That evidence shall include the date of 

adoption or final issuance as well as the effective date of the plan, if 

different from the adoption/issuance date. 

Check to see if the regulation, permit, order or consent decree has a 

sunset or expiration date. If so it is not acceptable as a SIP 

submission. 

3. Evidence that the State has the necessary legal authority under 

State law to adopt and implement the plan. 

~. A copy of actual regulation, or document submitted for approval 

and incorporation by reference into the plan, including indication of 

he changes made to the existing approved plan, where applicable. 

[The submittal shall be a copy of the official State 

1. 

2. 

3. 

4. 

ACCEPTABLE 

STATE SUBMITTAL 6J1 

Letter from Virginia Department of Environmental X 

Quality dated 9/27/10 signed by David Paylor (designee) 

SIP package contains copy ofVADEQ regulations- X 

Article 8 of 9V AC5 Chapter 80 Permits for Major 

Stationary Sources and Major Modifications Locating in 

Prevention of Significant Deterioration Areas and Article 9 

of9VAC5 Chapter 80 Permits for Major Stationary 

Sources and Major Modifications Locating in 

Nonattainment Areas 

Date of adoption: 12/15/08 

Effective date: 7/23/09 

No sunset or expiration date 

Noted in Volume 25, Issue 30 of Virginia Register of 

X 

Regulations dated 6/8/09. Authority is § 10.1-1308 of the 

Code of Virginia 

Copy of regulation showing changes and effective date is X 

included in submittal. 
egulation/document signed, stamped, dated by the appropriate State 

official indicating that it is fully enforceable by the State. The 

effective date of the regulation/document shall, whenever possible, 

be indicated in the document itself. 

5. Evidence that the State followed all of the procedural 5. Certification of compliance with state administrative X 

requirements of the State's laws and constitution in conducting and procedures and proof of public hearing notices is provided. 

coml'leting the adoption/issuance of the plan. 

6. Evidence that public notice was given of the proposed change 6. Proof of publication of public notice in the Washington X 

consistent with procedures approved by EPA, including the date of Examiner on August 4,2010 is provided. 

publication of such notice. 

7. Certification that public hearings were held in accordance with 7. Certification of Public Participation Activities states that X 

he information provided in the public notice and the State's laws the public notices included procedures to afford the public 

and constitution, if applicable. the opportunity to request that a hearing be held and that 

no such request was received. 

8. Compilation of public comments and the State's response thereto. No comments were received/information provided 

X 

8. 

Technical Materials 

1. Identification of all regulated pollutants affected by the plan. 1. Regulations regarding regulated new source review (NSR) X 

pollutants and hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) in Virginia 

2. Identification of the locations of affected sources including the 2. Major Stationary Sources and Major Modifications 

EP A attainmentlnonattainment designation of the locations and the Locating in Prevention of Significant Deterioration Areas X 

status of the attainment plan for the affected area(s). and in Nonattainment Areas 

3. Quantification of the changes in plan allowable emissions from 3. N/A X 

he affected sources; estimates of changes in current actual 

emissions from affected sources or, where appropriate, 

quantification of changes in actual emissions from affected sources 

hrough calculations of the differences between certain baseline 

levels and allowable emissions anticipated as a result of the revision. 

4. The State's demonstration that the national ambient air quality 4. Regulations to allow permits to be combined will enhance X 

standards, prevention of significant deterioration increments, the current approved program in Virginia. Air Guidance 

easonable further progress demonstration, and visibility, as Memo No. APG-308: Interpretation of9 VAC 5-80-1695 

applicable, are protected if the plan is approved and implemented. F - Exemption of alternative fuels under Major NSR 
clarifies that the major NSR program is unaffected by 

proposed SIP revision so that the NAAQS, PSD 

increments, reasonable further progress demonstration, and 

visibility are protected. 

5. Modeling information required to support the proposed revision, 5. N/A X 

including input data, output data, models used, ambient monitoring 

data used, meteorological data used, justification for use of offsite 

data (where used), modes of models used, assumptions, and other 

information relevant to the determination of adequacy of the 

modeling analysis. 

6. Evidence, where necessary, that emission limitations are based on 6. N/A X 

continuous emission reduction technology. 

7. Evidence that the plan contains emission limitations, work 7. Regulations to allow permits to be combined will better X 

practice standards and recordkeepinglreporting requirements, where ensure that major NSR and minor NSR terms and 

pecessary, to ensure emission levels. conditions are preserved and better understood by the 

permittee, the public, and the regl!lating agency. 

8. Compliance/enforcement strategies, including how compliance 8. Regulations to allow permits to be combined will better X 

~ill be determined in practice. ensure that compliance will be determined in practice in 

that there will be more effective and efficient issuance of 

NSR permits. 

9. Special economic and technological justifications required by any 9. Economic impact analysis of all proposed changes X 

applicable EPA policies. (If a policy is not appropriate, explain concludes that benefits are likely to exceed the costs. 

~hy.) 

10. A Section 107 request must be accompanied by a maintenance 10. N/A X 

lPlan demonstrating maintenance to the relevant NAAQS for at least 

10 years after redesignation. 
t 

(