alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT
OF INCOME FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                       1,678,178
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,403,865
<ALLOWANCES>                                   380,911
<INVENTORY>                                  5,244,116
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            10,134,466
<PP&E>                                       5,621,745
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,647,021
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              14,685,412
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       11,561,365
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                 11,967,233
<COMMON>                                       466,349
<OTHER-SE>                                 (9,964,279)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                14,685,412
<SALES>                                     11,118,339
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            11,118,339
<CGS>                                        7,753,037
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               21,310,233
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               398,306
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,230,241
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (12,820,441)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (12,820,441)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (13,892,830)<F1>
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.31)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.31)

<FN>
<F1>Net loss applicable to Common Stock
</FN>

</TABLE>
Appeal No. 75-48.

#### Roland J. Asselin *v.*Deeb G. Sarkas, *Liquor Control Administrator.*

*Anthony A. Cipriano,*for plaintiff. *Julius C. Michaelson,*Attorney General, *George H. Egan,*Special Asst. Attorney General, for defendant.

Defendant is hereby ordered to Show Cause why the appeal in the above-entitled matter should not be dismissed because of lack of jurisdiction. *Savings Bank of Newport*v. *Hawksley,*103 R. I. 741, 241 A.2d 806 (1968); *Clark*v. *Fascio,*106 R. I. 751, 264 A.2d 317 (1970). Defendant has twenty days from the date of this order to submit a memorandum in support of its appeal.
Opinion issued October 25, 2012

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-12-00282-CV

———————————

W.A.G. CONSTRUCTION, INC., Appellant

V.

MARK HATCHER, Appellee

On Appeal from the 151st District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2010-62355

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, W.A.G. Construction, Inc., has filed an unopposed motion to 

dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.1(a), 42.1(a)(1). No opinion has 

issued. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(c). 
2

Accordingly, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 42.1(a)(1). We dismiss any other pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Bland and Huddle.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 5.0.3

Eastern Division

Unified Messaging Solutions, LLC

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:12−cv−01487

Honorable Ruben Castillo

Discover Financial Services

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Friday, August 17, 2012:

 MINUTE entry before Honorable Morton Denlow: Settlement conference set for

8/30/2012 is vacated. All matters relating to the referral of this action having been

resolved, the case is returned to the assigned judge.Mailed notice(ldg, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:12-cv-01487 Document #: 32 Filed: 08/17/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:376
U.S. Department of Education

Negotiated Rulemaking

830 First Street N.E.

Washington, D.C.

Borrower Defense

Session Two

January 8-11, 2018 

9:00 am – 5:00 pm

DRAFT AGENDA

Welcome and Remarks: James Manning

Review Agenda

Review Meeting Summary for Session One

Report from Financial Responsibility Subcommittee

Discussion of Subcommittee Report

Data Requests

Discuss Issues and Proposed Regulatory Language

· Issue 1:  Federal Standard for Borrower Defense Claims

· Issue 2:  Borrower Defense Claim Process

· Issue 3:  Financial Responsibility and Administrative Capability    

· Issue 4:  Pre-dispute Arbitration Agreements, Class Action Waivers, and Internal Dispute Processes

· Issue 5:  Closed School Discharge

· Issue 6:  False Certification Discharge

· Issue 7:  Guaranty Agency Collection Fees

· Issue 8:  Recalculation of Subsidized Usage Period

Report from Financial Responsibility Subcommittee

Next Steps

· Session Three: February 12-15, 2018, LBJ Building: 400 Maryland Ave, S.W., Barnard Auditorium

· Revised Regulatory Text

· Meeting Summary

· Other

Public Comment
#### 217.7500 Scope of subpart.

This subpart provides guidance on additional requirements related to acquisition of replenishment parts.

[56 FR 36345, July 31, 1991, as amended at 71 FR 27643, May 12, 2006]
204.805 Disposal of contract files. ( 1 ) The sources of the period for which contract files must be retained are General Records Schedule 3 (Procurement, Supply, and Grant Records) and General Records Schedule 6 (Accountable Officers' Accounts Records). Copies of the General Records Schedule may be obtained from the National Archives and Records Administration, Washington, DC 20408.
( 2 ) Deviations from the periods cannot be granted by the Defense Acquisition Regulatory Council. Forward requests for deviations to both the Government Accountability Office and the National Archives and Records Administration.
( 3 ) Hold completed contract files in the office responsible for maintaining them for a period of 12 months after completion. After the initial 12 month period, send the records to the local records holding or staging area until they are eligible for destruction. If no space is available locally, transfer the files to the General Services Administration Federal Records Center that services the area.
( 4 ) Duplicate or working contract files should contain no originals of materials that properly belong in the official files. Destroy working files as soon as practicable once they are no longer needed.
( 5 ) Retain pricing review files, containing documents related to reviews of the contractor's price proposals, subject to certified cost or pricing data (see FAR 15.403-4), for six years. If it is impossible to determine the final payment date in order to measure the six year period, retain the files for nine years.
[56 FR 36289, July 31, 1991, as amended at 62 FR 40472, July 29, 1997; 63 FR 11528, Mar. 9, 1998; 71 FR 53044, Sept. 8, 2006; 77 FR 76939, Dec. 31, 2012; 80 FR 58632, Sept. 30, 2015]
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

ALWANNA KNIGHT, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) No. 12 C 11

) USCA No. 12-1132

AURORA LOAN SERVICES, LLC, )

)

Defendant. )

MEMORANDUM ORDER

On January 5, 2012 this Court issued a memorandum order

(“Order”) explaining why pro se plaintiff Alwanna Knight

(“Knight”) was not entitled to in forma pauperis treatment, not

in financial terms but because of her failure to assert a

nonfrivolous claim (in the legal sense). To that end this Court

had gone through Knight’s bulky documentation, which reflected

the mindset that everyone in sight (or perhaps even out of sight)

was conspiring against her. Some notion of that may be gleaned

from some of Knight’s headings reproduced in the Order.

Although the Order’s rejection of in forma pauperis

treatment for Knight would have spared her the potential waste of

the $350 filing fee that would have had to be paid for this

action to go forward (see Order n.2), Knight’s subsequent action

has proved again the aphorism that “no good deed goes

unpunished.” On January 17 (without this action having yet been

dismissed) she filed a notice of appeal that added this Court to

the coterie of judges and others who are assertedly conspiring
against her--Knight’s “Jurisdictional Statement” is replete with

scurrilous characterizations that are truly outrageous (though

perhaps not unexpected, given her mindset that everyone who

disagrees with her is out to do her in).

In any event, on January 25 Knight tendered to the Court of

Appeals her motion seeking leave to appeal in forma pauperis, and

on the same day that court ordered the motion to be transferred

to this District Court for ruling. Nothing has changed Knight’s

legal situation--her proposed appeal is just as frivolous in

legal terms as her Complaint was at the District Court level. 

This Court accordingly denies Knight’s in forma pauperis motion,

reminding her (as the Court of Appeals’ order did) that to place

the same motion before that court she must refile her motion

there (see Fed. R. App. P. 24).

________________________________________

Milton I. Shadur

Senior United States District Judge

Date: February 1, 2012

2
#### 18.115 HUBZone sole source awards.

Contracts may be awarded to Historically Underutilized Business Zone (HUBZone) small business concerns on a sole source basis. (See 19.1306.)

[71 FR 38248, July 5, 2006. Redesignated at 72 FR 46344, Aug. 17, 2007]
----

|  | 1. | The Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2013, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 7, 2013 (“accompanied report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | 2. | The information contained in the accompanied report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of Capital Southwest Corporation. |
|--|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  November 7, 2013 | By:    | /s/ Joseph B. Armes                                  |  |
|------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------|--|
|                         |   | Joseph B. ArmesPresident and Chief Executive Officer |  |

----
#### 2052.235-70 Publication of research results.

As prescribed in 2035.70(a)(1), the contracting officer shall insert the following clause in applicable solicitations and contracts for research and development by private contractors and universities and for other technical services as appropriate.

# Publication of Research Results (OCT 1999)

(a) The principal investigator(s)/contractor shall comply with the provisions of NRC Management Directive 3.8 (Vol. 3, Part 1) and NRC Handbook 3.8 (Parts I-IV) regarding publication in refereed scientific and engineering journals or dissemination to the public of any information, oral or written, concerning the work performed under this contract. Failure to comply with this clause shall be grounds for termination of this contract.

(b) The principal investigator(s)/contractor may publish the results of this work in refereed scientific and engineering journals or in open literature and present papers at public or association meetings at interim stages of work, in addition to submitting to NRC the final reports and other deliverables required under this contract. However, such publication and papers shall focus on advances in science and technology and minimize conclusions and/or recommendations which may have regulatory implications.

(c) The principal investigator(s) shall coordinate all such publications with, and transmit a copy of the proposed article or paper to, the NRC Contracting Officer or Project Officer, prior to publication. The NRC agrees to review and provide comments within thirty (30) days after receipt of a proposed publication. However, in those cases where the information to be published is (1) subject to Commission approval, (2) has not been ruled upon, or (3) disapproved by the Commission, the NRC reserves the right to disapprove or delay the publication. Further, if the NRC disagrees with the proposed publication for any reason, it reserves the right to require that any publication not identify the NRC's sponsorship of the work and that any associated publication costs shall be borne by the contractor.

(End of clause)
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 994 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                 S. 994

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide for the protection of 
 community centers with religious affiliation, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protecting Religiously Affiliated 
Institutions Act of 2018''.

SEC. 2. PROTECTION OF COMMUNITY CENTERS WITH RELIGIOUS AFFILIATION.

    Section 247 of title 18, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)(2), by inserting after ``threat of 
        force,'' the following: ``including by threat of force against 
        religious real property,'';
            (2) in subsection (d)--
                    (A) in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by 
                inserting ``or (c)'' after ``subsection (a)'';
                    (B) in paragraph (3), by striking ``and'' at the 
                end;
                    (C) by redesignating paragraph (4) as paragraph 
                (5); and
                    (D) by inserting after paragraph (3) the following:
            ``(4) if damage to or destruction of property results from 
        the acts committed in violation of this section, which damage 
        to or destruction of such property is in an amount that exceeds 
        $5,000, a fine in accordance with this title, imprisonment for 
        not more than 3 years, or both; and''; and
            (3) in subsection (f), by inserting before the period at 
        the end the following: ``, or real property owned or leased by 
        a nonprofit, religiously affiliated organization''.

            Passed the Senate September 4, 2018.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
115th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                 S. 994

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide for the protection of 
 community centers with religious affiliation, and for other purposes.
```
#### 16.603 Letter contracts.
#### Alpheus Horney *v.*Cyrus Johnson et al.

House, O. J., Loiselle, MacDonald, Bogdanski and Longo, Js.

Argued January 10

decision released February 11, 1975

*Robert E. Reilly,*with whom was *Frederick P. Amore,*for the appellant (plaintiff).

*William J. Doyle,*for the appellee (defendant Nustone Industries, Inc.).

Per Curiam.

This is an appeal from a summary judgment issued on motion of one of the defendants, Nustone Industries, l'nc., hereafter referred to as the defendant. From a stipulation of facts and a finding by the court, the following facts appear: The plaintiff was employed by the defendant and on July 7, 1967, on his way to work, drove his automobile into a parking lot maintained by his employer for employee parking. There, while he was in the process of exiting from his automobile to begin his day’s work, he was struck by a truck owned by the defendant and operated by a fellow employee. The defendant was an “employer” within the meaning of that term as used in the Workmen’s Compensation Act, chapter 568 of the General Statutes. The plaintiff filed a claim against the defendant for compen*622sation benefits pursuant to the Workmen’s Compensation Act and the defendant has paid him compensation benefits pursuant to the provisions of that act. The plaintiff’s attorney wrote a letter to the workmen’s compensation commissioner dated August 28,1967, in which he stated that the plaintiff was accepting workmen’s compensation benefits “without prejudice to our negligence claim against the employee of Nustone and said corporation.”

In answer to the plaintiff’s complaint, the defendant filed on October 23, 1968, a special defense alleging that at the time of the accident the plaintiff was employed by the defendant, that the accident arose out of and in the course of such employment, that the defendant had taken all actions required of it by the Workmen’s Compensation Act, that the plaintiff had filed a claim pursuant to that act, and that under § 31-284 of the General Statutes the benefits of that act constitute the plaintiff’s exclusive remedy against the defendant so that the court does not have jurisdiction of the negligence claim alleged against the defendant. On June 19, 1973, the defendant filed the stipulation of facts to which we have hereinbefore referred, executed by the attorneys for the parties, and a motion for summary judgment claiming that there was no genuine issue as to any material fact with respect to its special defense. After hearing, the court rendered judgment, finding that there existed no genuine issue as to any material fact with respect to liability and that the defendant was entitled to judgment as a matter of law. It is from this judgment that the plaintiff appealed to this court.

In view of the contents of the stipulation of facts entered into by the parties, the provisions of § 31-284 *623of the General Statutes, and the holding of such cases as *Hughes*v. *American Brass Co.,*141 Conn. 231, 104 A.2d 896, we find no error in the conclusion of the court that there existed no genuine issue as to any material fact and in its rendition of judgment for the defendant.

There is no error.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 5.0.3

Eastern Division

Innovatio IP Ventures, LLC, Patent Litigation,

et al.

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:11−cv−09308

Honorable James F.

Holderman

JW Marriott Chicago, et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Monday, November 5, 2012:

 MINUTE entry before Honorable James F. Holderman: Plaintiff's agreed motion

to dismiss with prejudice pursuant to F.R.C.P. 41(a)(2) [456] is granted. Motion hearing

date of 11/6/12 is stricken. Notice mailed by judge's staff (ntf, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:11-cv-09308 Document #: 470 Filed: 11/05/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:16794
216.703 Basic ordering agreements. ( c ) *Limitations.* The period during which orders may be placed against a basic ordering agreement may not exceed 5 years.
( d ) *Orders.* Follow the procedures at PGI 216.703(d) for issuing orders under basic ordering agreements.
[71 FR 39008, July 11, 2006]
#### 1432.501-2 Unusual progress payments.

The CO shall obtain the advance approval of the HCA, or designee, before providing a progress payment rate higher than the customary rates as defined in FAR 32.501-1. Advance approval to provide progress payment rates higher than the customary rates shall not be delegated lower than the CCO.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-27-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-28-2000
<CASH>                                          27,400
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    572,800
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               634,200
<PP&E>                                         339,600
<DEPRECIATION>                                 147,700
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 875,600
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          277,700
<BONDS>                                        296,700
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,100
<OTHER-SE>                                     266,800
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   875,600
<SALES>                                        986,900
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               986,900
<CGS>                                          527,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  969,400
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              21,100
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,600)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,400)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,200)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,300)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.24)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.24)


</TABLE>
###### Editorial Note on Part 842

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 842 appear at 81 FR 83688, Nov. 22, 2016.

#### § 842.11 Claims payable.

Claims for property willfully damaged or wrongfully taken by Air Force military personnel as a result of riotous, violent, or disorderly conduct. If a claim is payable under this part and also under another part, it may be paid under this part if authorized by AFLOA/JACC.

[55 FR 2809, Jan. 29, 1990. Redesignated at 81 FR 83688, Nov. 22, 2016]