alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10P

                                                                     May 6, 1999

Richard L. Markee
709 Barrister Court
Franklin Lakes, New Jersey  07417

Dear Mr. Markee:

     The purpose of this letter is to confirm our agreement requiring you to
provide notice to Toys "R" Us, Inc. ("TRU") if you were to terminate your
employment with TRU at any time. This letter constitutes an amendment of your
employment contract dated May 1, 1997 (the "Contract") pursuant to Section 13(c)
of the Contract.

     Specifically, we have agreed that, in exchange for TRU providing you with
additional consideration to the consideration provided to you under the
Contract, including the issuance of additional restricted stock units, you shall
provide TRU with not less than four months advance notice (the "Mandatory Notice
Period") prior to your terminating for any reason other than Good Reason (as
described in the Contract) your employment with TRU. You have agreed that during
the Mandatory Notice Period you shall continue to perform all of your duties in
accordance, and in compliance, with the terms of the Contract.

     You have also agreed that, prior to and during the term of the Mandatory
Notice Period, you shall not disclose to any third parties, other than executive
search firms, prospective employers (collectively, the "Permitted Third
Parties") and your wife, your intention and/or decision to terminate employment
with TRU. Prior to any disclosure of any such information to any Permitted Third
Party, you shall secure from each Permitted Third Party the Permitted Third
Party's written agreement not to disclose such information until after the
Mandatory Notice Period to anyone other than officers and directors of such
Permitted Third Party who need to know such information.

     You acknowledge that the provisions of this letter agreement are reasonable
and necessary for the protection of TRU and its subsidiaries and affiliates. In
addition, you acknowledge that TRU and its subsidiaries and affiliates will be
irrevocably damaged if you fail to provide TRU with at least four months advance
notice of termination or otherwise fail to comply with the terms of this letter,
as provided for herein. Accordingly, you agree that, in addition to any other
relief to which TRU may be entitled, TRU will be entitled to seek and obtain
injunctive relief (without the requirement of any bond) from a court of
competent jurisdiction for the purposes of restraining you from any actual or
threatened breach of your obligations hereunder.

     If this letter accurately sets forth in full the terms of our agreement
concerning the matters set forth herein, please execute this letter where
indicated.

                                   Sincerely,

                                   TOYS "R" US, INC.

                                           By:/s/ Robert C. Nakasone
                                              ---------------------------
                                                  Robert C. Nakasone
                                                  Chief Executive Officer

SO AGREED

/s/ Richard L. Markee
--------------------------
    Richard L. Markee
(November 10, 1960)

#### Penrilyn Aston, Respondent, v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul and Pacific Railroad Company, Appellant.

Motion by appellant for a stay granted, on condition that appellant perfect the appeal and be ready to argue or submit the appeal at the December Term, beginning November 28, 1960. The appeal is ordered on the calendar for said term. The record and appellant’s brief must be served and filed on or before November 17, 1960. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Kleinfeld, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur.
#### 1602.170-9 Health benefits plan.

*Health benefits plan* means a group insurance policy, contract, medical or hospital service agreement, membership or subscription contract, or similar group arrangements provided by a carrier for the purpose of providing, arranging for, delivering, paying for, or reimbursing any of the costs of health care services.

[62 FR 47574, Sept. 10, 1997]
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT KIMBERLY GOODMAN, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-5 ) SEAN GOODMAN, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed September 21, 2018. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lee County; John S. Carlin, Judge. Kimberly Goodman, pro se. Bernard T. King of Rubinstein, Holz & King, P.A., Fort Myers, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. KHOUZAM, and LUCAS, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.
Exhibit 21

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT


Name                                                 State of Formation
------------------------------------------------     ------------------
Connecticut Storage Fund........................         California
PS Co-Investment Partners.......................         California
PS Illinois Trust...............................          Delaware
PS Insurance Company - Hawaii, Ltd..............           Hawaii
PS Orangeco Holdings, Inc.......................         California
PS Orangeco, Inc...............................          California
PS Partners VIII, Ltd...........................         California
PS Partners, Ltd................................         California
PS Texas Holdings, Ltd. ........................           Texas
PSA Institutional Partners, L.P.................         California
PSAC Development Partners, L.P..................         California
Public Storage Properties IV, Ltd...............         California
Public Storage Properties V, Ltd................         California
Public Storage Institutional Fund...............         California
Public Storage Institutional Fund II............         California
Public Storage Institutional Fund III...........         California
Public Storage Institutional Fund IV............         California
Public Storage Pickup & Delivery, L.P...........         California
STOR-Re Mutual Insurance Corporation............           Hawaii
Storage Trust Properties, L.P. .................          Delaware
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Connie Gianvecchio, Respondent, v. NYS Newark State School et al., Appellants. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.

This is an appeal by the employer and earner from a. decision of the Workmen’s -Compensation Board which held that the claimant, a, volunteer worker at the appellant State School, was entitled to compensation pursuant to subdivision 3 of section 14 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law. *761The rule is well established that subdivisions 1 and 2 of section 14 cannot be applied to an occasional worker such as the claimant. The board, however, used claimant’s actual earnings in her *regular,*employment to compute her average weekly wage in the volunteer employment in which she was injured. The two employments were *dissimilar*and accordingly, her earnings in her *regular*employment cannot he used to compute her average weekly wage. Claimant’s earning capacity must he measured by wages of those similarly employed or employed part time by the employer herein or by other similar institutions. *(Matter of linppert*v. *Plattdeutsche Folksfest Verein,*263 N. Y. 338.) Decision reversed and matter reunited to the Workmen’s Compensation Board for the proper determination of claimant’s average weekly wage and a proper award based thereon, with costs to the appellants against the Workmen's Compensation Board. Bergan, P. J., Coon, Gibson, Herlihy and Reynolds, JJ., concur.
#### 1552.203-70 Current/former agency employee involvement certification.

As prescribed in 1503.670, insert the following provision in all EPA solicitations for sole-source acquisitions.

# Current/Former Agency Employee Involvement Certification (JUL 2016)

The offeror (quoter) hereby certifies that:

(a) He/She is [ ] is not [ ] a former employee or special government employee whose EPA employment terminated within one year prior to submission of this offer (quote).

(b) He/She does [ ] does not [ ] employ or propose to employ a current/former employee or special government employee whose EPA employment terminated within one year prior to submission of this offer (quote) and who has been or will be involved, directly or indirectly, in developing or negotiating this offer (quote) for the offeror (quoter), or in the management, administration or performance of any contract resulting from this offer (quote).

(c) He/She does [ ] does not [ ] employ or propose to employ as a consultant or subcontractor under any contract resulting from this offer (quote) a current/former employee or special government employee whose EPA employment terminated within one year prior to submission of this offer (quote).

(d) A former employee or special government employee whose EPA employment terminated within one year prior to submission of this offer (quote) or such former employee's spouse or minor child does [ ] does not [ ] own or substantially own or control the offeror's (quoter's) firm.

(e) See EPAAR part 1503.600-71 for definitions of the terms “employee” and “special government employee.”

(End of provision)

[81 FR 31180, May 18, 2016]
#### 209.409 Contract clause.

Use the clause at 252.209-7004, Subcontracting with Firms that are Owned or Controlled by the Government of a Country that is a State Sponsor of Terrorism, in solicitations and contracts with a value of $150,000 or more.

[79 FR 73489, Dec. 11, 2014, as amended at 86 FR 59870, Oct. 29, 2021]
#### § 735.1 Purpose.

To promulgate latest guidance on reporting births and deaths, including births to which part 138 of this title is applicable.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. James Adam Hall, Appellant.

Motion by respondent to dismiss appeal granted, and appeal dismissed. Beldock, Acting P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Pette, JJ., concur.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

NICK PEARSON, On Behalf of Himself 

and All Others Similarly Situated,

Plaintiff,

v.

TARGET CORPORATION, a Minnesota 

Corporation, 

Defendant.

Case No.: 11 CV 07972

CLASS ACTION

Judge James B. Zagel

NOTICE OF CHANGE OF FIRM

Please take notice that Stewart M. Weltman has changed firms from Futterman Howard 

Ashley & Weltman P.C. to Levin Fishbein Sedran & Berman as Of Counsel. Mr. Weltman’s

new contact information is:

Stewart M. Weltman

LEVIN FISHBEIN SEDRAN & BERMAN

122 S. Michigan Avenue, Suite 1850

Chicago, Illinois 60603

Tel: 312-427-3600

sweltman@weltmanlawfirm.com

Case: 1:11-cv-07972 Document #: 22 Filed: 06/14/12 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:100
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned hereby certifies that on this 14th day of June, 2012, a copy of the 

foregoing Notice of Change of Firm was filed with the Clerk of Court using the CMM/ECF 

system which will send notification of such filing to the following:

David B. Sudzus

Bradley J. Andreozzi

Benjamin Todd Vinson

Justin O’Neill Kay

Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP

191 N. Wacker Drive, Suite 3700

Chicago, IL 60606

s/Stewart M. Weltman

Case: 1:11-cv-07972 Document #: 22 Filed: 06/14/12 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:101
#### 1852.216-84 Estimated cost and incentive fee.

As prescribed in 1816.406-70(d), insert the following clause:

# Estimated Cost and Incentive Fee (OCT 1996)

The target cost of this contract is $______. The target fee of this contract is $______. The total target cost and target fee as contemplated by the Incentive Fee clause of this contract are $______.

The maximum fee is $______.

The minimum fee is $______.

The cost sharing for cost underruns is: Government ____ percent; Contractor ____ percent.

The cost sharing for cost overruns is: Government ____ percent; Contractor ____ percent.

(End of clause)

[62 FR 3486, Jan. 23, 1997, as amended at 62 FR 36733, July 9, 1997]
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

Administrators
Case: 1:12-cv-01661 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/07/12 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:1
Case: 1:12-cv-01661 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/07/12 Page 2 of 5 PageID #:2
Case: 1:12-cv-01661 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/07/12 Page 3 of 5 PageID #:3
Case: 1:12-cv-01661 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/07/12 Page 4 of 5 PageID #:4
Case: 1:12-cv-01661 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/07/12 Page 5 of 5 PageID #:5
#### SALIS, Respondent, v. METROPOLITAN ST. RY. CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

November 6, 1903.)

Action by Emil Salis against the Metropolitan Street Railway Company.

H. Melville, for appellant.

H. A. Heydt, for respondent.

No opinion. Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.
**U.S. Department of Education**

**Negotiated Rulemaking**

**1990 K Street, NW, 8th Floor Conference Center**

**Washington, D.C.**

**Team I – Teacher Preparation Issues**

**April 3, 2012, 9:00 am – 5:00 pm**

**April 4, 2012, 9:00 am – 5:00 pm**

**April 5, 2012, 9:00 am – 12:00 pm**

**Agenda**

**Facilitator’s Welcome**

**Agenda Overview**

**Meeting Summary from Prior Session**

**Housekeeping and Other Issues**

**Review of Issues and Proposed Regulatory Language:**

**I.   Rulemaking issues**

1. Draft regulatory text on 612.2, 612.3, 612.4, 612.5, and 612.6 (covers the following issues):

Issue 1:  Recommendations regarding current institution of higher education, teacher preparation program, and State reporting requirements on teacher education program quality

Issue 2:  Recommendations for supplemental State reporting on teacher education program quality that would either replace or augment current reporting requirements

Issue 3:  Criteria used by States to assess the performance of teacher preparation programs

Issue 4:  Standards for State identification of low-performing or at-risk teacher preparation programs

2.   Draft regulatory text:  Definition of “high quality teacher preparation program” (covers    Issue 6)

3.   Draft regulatory text 612.7 (covers Issue 5:  Termination of the eligibility of teacher preparation programs to enroll students receiving Title IV student assistance in cases where the State has withdrawn its approval or terminated its financial support based on the State’s identification of the program as low-performing)

4.   Draft regulatory text 612.8 (covers Issue 5:  How a low-performing teacher preparation program may regain eligibility to accept or enroll students receiving Title IV, HEA funds)

5.   Issue 8:  Teaching in a high-need field to fulfill the TEACH Grant Agreement to Serve

6.   Re-affirm tentative consensus on Issues 7, 9, and 10

 Issue 7:  Service and repayment obligations for the TEACH Grant Program: Teaching service performed for an Educational Service Agency

Issue 9:  Eligibility for a new TEACH Grant after receiving a discharge of the TEACH Grant agreement to serve based on total and permanent disability

Issue 10:  Discharge of the TEACH Grant agreement to serve based on the total and permanent disability of a TEACH Grant recipient

7.  Call for final consensus on the proposed regulatory package

**II.  Non-rulemaking issues (items for OMB Clearance under the Paperwork Reduction Act)**

· Institutional Report Card

· State Report Card

· Call for agreement on non-rulemaking issues

� Twenty-minute morning and afternoon breaks on each day will begin at approximately 10:30 a.m. and 3:15 p.m.  The lunch recess on each day will begin at approximately 12 noon.   Time will be made available for public comment during the meeting.

2
#### Food Fair Stores, Westchester, Inc., Respondent, v. General Excess Insurance Co., Ltd., et al., Defendants, and Progress Insurance Company, Limited, Appellant.

In an action based on insurance cover notes in connection with liability insurance, in which substituted service of the summons and complaint had been made, pursuant to section 59-a of the Insurance Law, upon the defendant Progress Insurance Company, Limited, a British insurance company, said defendant appeals from an order of' the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated June 3, 1963, which denied its motion to set aside such service on the ground that it, as an insurer not authorized to do business in this State, had not done any of the acts enumerated in section 59-a (subd. 2, par. [a]) of the Insurance Law; such denial being without prejudice to a renewal of the motion on a showing by said defendant *“*that it is not engaged in any reinsurance business involving or relating to New York residents.” Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements; motion granted; and service of the summons and complaint upon defendant Progress Insurance Company, Limited, vacated. We shall assume that in some instances, where a foreign insurer is engaged solely in the business of reinsurance and reinsures insurers which insure New York residents, constructive service of process may be resorted to by the original insured, pursuant to section 59-a of the Insurance Law (but, see, *Safeway Trails*v. *Stuyvesant Ins. Co.,*211 P. Supp. 227, 233, affd. on other grounds 316 P. 2d 234). But here the plaintiff, a New York corporation, is suing as the assignee of a Pennsylvania corporation, and there is no contention that plaintiff’s assignor was authorized to do business in New York. In our opinion, section 59-a of the Insurance Law was not intended to protect either persons who were not residents of this State or corporations which were not authorized to do business here when the insurance contracts were executed and the liabilities or losses were incurred *(Clifton Prods.*v. *American Universal Ins. Co.,*169 F. Supp. 842; cf. *Safeway Trails*v. *Stuyvesant Ins. Co.,*supra; *Schutt v. Commercial Travelers Mut. Acc. Assn.,*229 F. 2d 158). It was not intended to protect a domestic corporation which brought suit as the assignee of a foreign corporation which was not authorized to do business here (cf. *State ex rel. Equitable Life Assur. Soc. of U. S.*v. *Allen,*345 Mo. 671). Beldock, P. J., Brennan, Hill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          14,000
<SECURITIES>                                   200,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                  790,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    101,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,171,000
<PP&E>                                       4,020,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,395,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,368,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          572,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        13,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,289,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,368,000
<SALES>                                      1,570,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,571,000
<CGS>                                        1,094,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,354,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              31,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                195,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            195,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   195,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .15


</TABLE>
|   |
|---|
|   |  |
| 1 | The Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2018, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 7, 2018 (“accompanied report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |

|   |
|---|
|   |  |
| 2 | The information contained in the accompanied report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of Capital Southwest Corporation. |

|                            |
|----------------------------|
|                            |  |  |
|                       |   |   |
| Date:  August 7, 2018 | By: | /s/ Michael S. Sarner |
|                       |   | Michael S. Sarner |
|                       |   | Chief Financial Officer |
§ 776.40 Meritorious claims and contentions. ( a ) A covered attorney shall not bring or defend a proceeding, or assert or controvert an issue therein, unless there is a basis for doing so that is not frivolous, which includes a good faith argument for an extension, modification, or reversal of existing law. A covered attorney representing an accused in a criminal proceeding or the respondent in an administrative proceeding, that could result in incarceration, discharge from the Naval service, or other adverse personnel action, may nevertheless defend the client at the proceeding as to require that every element of the case is established.
( b ) [Reserved]
### Economic effects of western Federal land-use restrictions on U.S. coal markets

By: William Downing WatsonA.L. MedlinK.K. KrohnD.S. BrookshireR. L. Bernknopf

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/cir1042

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.