alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
32.1
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the Annual Report of Security National Financial Corporation
(the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2007, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
I, George R. Quist, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and
belief:
 
 (1)
              the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
 
 (2)
              the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.
 
 By:
              /s/
      George R. QuistGeorge
      R. QuistChairman
      of the Board andChief
      Executive OfficerMarch
      31, 2008
#### The People of the State of New York v. Edwin Kennedy.

Motion for leave to prosecute as a poor person granted to the extent and on the terms and conditions contained in the order of this court filed herein. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, Valente, McNally and Eager, JJ.
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 31.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

            PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Lawrence Butler, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of Alpha Technologies Group, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) (Intentionally left Blank)

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

/s/ Lawrence Butler
-------------------
Lawrence Butler
Chief Executive Officer
January 9, 2004
#### In the Matter of Eva Collins, Respondent, v. Leland Dutton, Judgment Debtor. First National City Bank, Third-Party Appellant.

In a proceeding supplementary to judgment, the third party, First National City Bank, appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered April 5, 1963 on reargument, made pursuant to statute (Civ. Prac. Act, i; 794, suibd. 2), which granted the judgment creditor’s motion: (a) to direct tiio bank to pay her (the movant) the credit balance of $14,517.02, plus accrued interest, in a savings account at the bank maintained by the judgment debtor in his name; and (lb) to direct that the order be docketed ns a judgment (such order being thereafter docketed as a judgment on April 12, 1963). Order affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Kleinfeld, Acting P. J., Christ, Hill and Raibin, JJ., concur; Brennan, J., dissents and votes to modify the order as indicated in the following memorandum: In my opinion, the liability of the bank to pay the amount demanded should be conditioned upon the judgment creditor producing’ *741the passbook or filing an undertaking for twice the amount to save the bank harmless. The Special Term should have taken cognizance of the limitation upon withdrawals or payments contained in the contract between the bank and its depositor, to which the account was subject (cf. *Yonkers-Cameo*v. *Liossatos,*262 App. Div. 996; *Elvira Apts.*v. *Kidd,*259 App. Div. 874).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
balance sheet, statement of income, statement of retained earnings and
statement of cash flows contained in Form 10-Q of Canal Electric Company for
the six months ended June 30, 1998 and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000016906
<NAME> CANAL ELECTRIC COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                            <C>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                   JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-TYPE>                        6-MOS
<BOOK-VALUE>                      PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>          266,397
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>          3,058
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>              24,394
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>            26,702
<OTHER-ASSETS>                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     320,551
<COMMON>                            38,080
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>            8,321
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                 56,145
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>     102,546
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                    0
<PREFERRED>                              0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                83,917
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                   6,935
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>           0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>          350
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>         10,943
<LEASES-CURRENT>                       571
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>     115,289
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>      320,551
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>           90,618
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                 4,076
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>          75,591
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>          79,667
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>             10,951
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                     352
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>      11,303
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>             4,252
<NET-INCOME>                         7,051
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>              0
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>        7,051
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>             4,036
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>            3,954
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>              20,040
<EPS-PRIMARY>                            0
<EPS-DILUTED>                            0
        


</TABLE>
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

MARILOU ADKINS, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D18-1418

)

JON G. TURNER, )

)

Appellee. )

______________________________ )

Opinion filed October 25, 2019.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for

Hillsborough County; Richard A. Nielsen,

Judge.

Tarya A. Tribble of Tribble Law Center,

P.A., Riverview, for Appellant.

Joseph T. Eagleton and Ceci C. Berman

of Brannock & Humphries, Tampa, and

Robert L. Olsen of Allen Dell, P.A.,

Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

NORTHCUTT, BLACK, and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

 

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

**(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**

 

 

In connection with the Annual Report ofBancTec, Inc, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-K for theyear ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission (the “Report”), I, Jeffrey D. Cushman, Senior Vice President and Chief FinancialOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to my knowledge:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 

 
| / s /    Jeffrey  D. Cushman   |   |
|----------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                               |
| Jeffrey D. Cushman                                 |
| Senior Vice President and Chief  Financial Officer |
|                                               |
| April 7, 2005                                      |

 

A signed original of this written statementrequired by 18 USC Section 1350 has been provided to the Company and willbe retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 

----
# SIERRA CLUB FOUNDED 1892 January 7, 20 1 6 Scott Mathias Associate Director Air Quality Policy Divis ion U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Re: Review of Sulfur Dioxide Air Dispersion Modeling Submitted by NRG Power LLC for the W.A. Parish Electric Generat ing Station Dear Mr. Math ias : On September 17, 2015, and again on December 14 ,2015, Sierra Club submitted air dispersion modeling conducted by Wingra Engineering , S.C. that demonstrated that sulfur dioxide ("S02") emissions from the W.A. Parish Electric Generating Station in Thompsons, Texas cause downwind S02 ambient air concentrations to exceed the 75 parts per billion National Ambient Air Quali ty Standard ("NAAQS"), which translates to 196.2 micrograms per cubic meter C''llg/m3 "). In particular, t he modeling demonstrated that the W
. A. Parish plant causes downwind S02 concentrations as high as 231.2 llg/m 3

. Accordingly, the area surrounding W.A. Parish should be designated nonattainment under EPA's 1

-hour S02 NAAQS. On July 24, 2015, however , NRG Texas Power submitted modeling conducted by a third-party consultant, suggesting that the W.A. Parish power plant does not cause exceedances ofthe S02 NAAQS, and therefore should no t be des ignated as nonattainment. E nclosed , please find the resu lts of an independent r eview o fN RG 's modeling analyses conducted by H. Andrew Gray , Ph.D. , of Gray Sky Solutions. Dr. Gray 's review concludes that NRG's modeling analysis relies on incorrect stack parameters and inappropriate surface data inputs. Correcting these errors results in S02 concentrations that are approximately 35% higher than NRG's modeling predicts. In fact, using the appropriate stack parameters and the recommended surface characteri stics would increaseMr. 

### Scott Mathias January 7 , 2016 Page2
the modeled design value to at least 221 11g/m3



### - well beyond the acceptable NAAQS level. As Sierra Club ' s previously submitted modeling demonstrates , those exceedances are even greater when nearby sources of S02 are taken into account. Accord ing ly , the area surrounding W.A. Parish should be des ignated nonattairunent under the NAAQS. We urge EPA to consider this information as it undertakes area designations in Texas for the 2010 revised primary S02 NAAQS. This information is being provided to both EPA ' s Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards and Region 6. In the meantime , p lease let me know if I can provide any additional information. Thank you for your attention to and consideration of this matter, and please do not hesitate to contact me if you would like to discuss further.

Joshua S ith Staff Atto ey Sierra Club 85 Second St. , Second Floor San Francisco, CA 94108 Phone: (415) 977

- 5560 Fax: (415) 977

- 5793 joshua.smith @ sierraclub.org
----

|  | 1. | The Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2015, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 9, 2015 (“accompanied report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | 2. | The information contained in the accompanied report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of Capital Southwest Corporation. |
|--|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  November 9, 2015 |   | By:  | /s/ Michael S. Sarner                    |   |
|------------------------------|--------|-----------|------------------------------------------|--------|
|                         |   |      | Michael S. SarnerChief Financial Officer |   |

----
Exhibit 31.2
 
      a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andd)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 May 28, 2010
    /s/ J. Per BrodinJ. Per BrodinChief Financial Officer
#### Jeane Lipkin, Appellant, v. Abraham Lipkin, Respondent.

Judgment of separation entered December 3, 1963, granting plaintiff wife support in the sum of $40 per week and $30 per week for the support of each of the two infant issue of the marriage, unanimously modified, on the law and on the facts, to the extent of increasing the support of the plaintiff wife to $80 per week, and, as so modified, affirmed, with costs to plaintiff-appellant. On this record the award to the plaintiff wife was inadequate. Settle order on notice. Concur — Breitel, J. P., McNally, Stevens, Eager and Steuer, JJ.
§ 989.24 Public notification. ( a ) Except as provided in § 989.26, public notification is required for various aspects of the EIAP.
( b ) Activities that require public notification include: ( 1 ) An EA and FONSI.
( 2 ) An EIS NOI.
( 3 ) Public scoping meetings.
( 4 ) Availability of the draft EIS.
( 5 ) Public hearings on the draft EIS (which should be included in the NOA for the draft EIS).
( 6 ) Availability of the final EIS.
( 7 ) The ROD for an EIS.
( c ) For actions of local concern, the list of possible notification methods in 40 CFR 1506.6(b)(3) is only illustrative. The EPF may use other equally effective means of notification as a substitute for any of the methods listed. Because many Air Force actions are of limited interest to persons or organizations outside the Air Force, the EPF may limit local notification to the SPOC, local government representatives, and local news media. For all actions covered under § 989.15(e)(2), and for all EIS notices, the public affairs office must purchase with EPF funds an advertisement in a prominent section of the local newspaper(s) of general circulation (not “legal” newspapers or “legal section” of general newspapers).
( d ) For the purpose of EIAP, the EPF begins the time period of local notification when it sends written notification to the state SPOC or other equivalent agency (date of letter of notification).
#### 1952.227-78 Disposition of prints and videotape recordings.

As prescribed in 1927.405(j) insert the following clause in License Agreements:

# Disposition of Prints and Videotape Recordings (FEB 1985)

If the Board elects to discontinue distribution and exhibition hereunder, or upon expiration of the term of this License Agreement, the Board will destroy all prints and erase all videotape recordings of the Film. A certificate(s) attesting to such destruction and/or erasure will be furnished the Licensor upon its written request.

(End of clause)
Exhibit
      32(b)







**CERTIFICATION
      FURNISHED PURSUANT TO**




**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**




**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**




**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Progress Energy, Inc.
      (the
“Company”) for the period ending March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Peter M. Scott III,
      Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)  the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
      applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)  the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.











/s/
      Peter M. Scott III


Peter
      M.
      Scott III


Executive
      Vice President and


Chief
      Financial Officer


May
      8,
      2007








This
      certification is being furnished and shall not be deemed filed by the Company
      for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
      or incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Exchange Act
      of
      1934, as amended, or the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 (2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 /s/ Michael H. GoldbergMichael H. GoldbergPresident and Chief Executive OfficerJuly 29, 2010/s/ Scott F. StephensScott F. StephensVice President and Chief Financial OfficerJuly 29, 2010
,rj ppTE:i1O

Mr Richard y: (:t,rev

Deputy kxecLItivc Officer

Ci1ifornia Air Resources Board

Post Ofike Ho 2 15

Sacramento, C*I ft,rnia 1 2

Dear Mr. Corey:

‘.‘(9t St’ee

:-.-

MAR 13 2012

On Fehruur’c 23. 2012. he Ctlifornia Air Resources L3oard submitcd rev:sions to the California State

Implementittion Plan. Wt have reiewei niaeria1s submitted with the following niles and found that

they fulfi:1 the cornp1eLenes criteria in 40 Code of Federal Rctilations Part 51. Appendix V.

Lmp2ri&Cointy

rnpriaI County

Sacramento Me1ropoLii

acrwnntc) MctrpcLm

San I)iego t’ouiry

r

San Diego Cowity

an Joquii Valley

San Joaguin Vae

Sn .Ioaqthri Va ky

[San ioaum

Sanuj 1art,ara County

r ‘outIi Coast AQM])

Ru1 FlUe

[A4ihsive and Sealart Applications

Potentiaho Emit

______ ___

904 PntinnOCSknitkanL I )ctrioratrn

______

PSD) Program J

101 General Provk,n nd DelinitLolls

-5k) Autorrmtiv. MhEIo EcJ.pniei: aid

Acia:ed Pam anc Components

Ciatini Orerdtiuns

II IxC’nnton tTcn1 -uIe ID Permit

______

I{e.guicernents

____________________

7.4 Me;al Conta:ner. Metal CLosur. and

-________Melal C&I Coating Operations

______

L r7.16 (i Am Operations

4352 Solid Fuel Fied floiler. Steam,

L (iterators and Process I Ieatr

441)2 Cnide Oil Production Sumps

___

4625 Waiewaicr SyraLOr —

Polv.l yrene, Polyethylene, and

PoltpvIeiii ProHucts Manufacturiitg

‘\iturl (5H-Fired Fii-Type C ATILr&

_________

T’urnaces and SiniIl Watir Heaters

4mS3 flrg.rnic Liquid Storngc

____APCD?AQMD__L

Ru

ArteopValIey I I 6X

46X2

1••

152

!. )c.C :‘
This nddresses all revisions in this submittal. In the coming months we will review the complete

revisions for action pursuant to Clean Air Act section 1 10(k).

Questions regarding our completeness review should be directed to Cynthia G. Allen at (415)947-4120.

Sincerely,

l)ehora’lTjoiidan

Director. Air 1)ivision

cc: Mr. Laity Greene. APCO/EO

Sacramento MetropoEtan AQMD

Mr. Eldon 1-teaston. FO

Antelope Valley AQMD

Mr. Robert Kard. APCO

San l)iego County APCD

Mr. Brad Poiriez. APCO

Imperial County APCD

Mr. Scycd Sadredin, EO/APCO

San Joaquin Vailcy APCD

Mr. l)ave Van Mullem. Director/APCO

Santa Rarbara County APCD

l)r. Bany Vallerstein, HO

South Coast AQMD

Mr. Michael Gunetta. Manager

Rule Evaluation Section

Stationary Source Division
FAFSA **Free Application for Federal Student Aid**

� EMBED PBrush  ���

# _1293530031.doc

# _1293530320.doc

# _1284209974

# _1284210026

# _1284209707