alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SUMMARY CONTAINS FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS OF BRIDGFORD FOODS CORPORATION FOR THE TWENTY-SIX WEEKS ENDED
MAY 2, 1997, AS SET FORTH IN THIS FORM 10-Q FOR SUCH PERIOD, AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                MAY-2-1997
<CASH>                                      11,111,626
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                9,403,464
<ALLOWANCES>                                   551,338
<INVENTORY>                                 14,576,102
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            42,875,319
<PP&E>                                      41,554,267
<DEPRECIATION>                              24,167,030
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              60,262,556
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       18,421,006
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     9,453,816
<OTHER-SE>                                  32,387,734
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                60,262,556
<SALES>                                     62,312,101
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            62,312,101
<CGS>                                       39,687,179
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               39,687,179
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            18,248,431
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                62,075
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             117,842
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,376,491
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,663,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,713,491
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,713,491
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .29
        

</TABLE>
**U.S. Department of Education**

**Negotiated Rulemaking**

**Borrower Defenses and Financial Responsibility**

**November 13-15, 2017, 9:00am – 5:00 pm**

**AGENDA**

**Welcome**

**Introductions**

**Overview of the negotiated rulemaking process**

**Review and adopt protocols**

**Petitions for membership**

**Overview of the issues**

**Formally finalize agenda**

**Discussion of issues**

**Next steps**

· Meeting 2:  January 8-11, 2018

· Meeting Summary

· Other
Exhibit 10.2
 
 
    
 MORTGAGE, ASSIGNMENT OF LEASES AND RENTS, SECURITY AGREEMENT AND FIXTURE FILING
    1




---



##### 



MORTGAGE, ASSIGNMENT OF LEASES AND RENTS, SECURITY AGREEMENT AND FIXTURE FILING
  W I T N E S S E T H




---



##### 



Exhibit
A
       ARTICLE 1.
 Secured Obligations.
 2




---



##### 



Maturity Date.
 Definitions.
 Credit Agreement
 Improvements
 Leases Section 2.4(a)
 Loan Documents
 Loans
 Material Adverse Effect
 Obligations
 Permitted Liens
 Person
 Personal Property Collateral
 Premises
 Real Property
 Rents Section 2.4(b)
 Secured Party Secured Parties
 Taxes
 Rules of Construction .
 3




---



##### 



ARTICLE 2.
 Payments by Mortgagor
 General Representations and Warranties
    Ownership, Use and Care of the Premises.
    4




---



##### 



Rents and Leases.
      5




---



##### 



Insurance
    6




---



##### 



Condemnation
 Expenses
 Subrogation
 Performance by Agent of Defaults by Mortgagor
 Further Assurances
 7




---



##### 



ARTICLE 3.
 Event of Default
 Right of Agent to Enter and Take Possession.
  Section 3.2(a)
 Sections
3.2(a) 3.2(b)
 Section 3.2
 8




---



##### 



Section 3.2
 Judicial Proceedings; Right to Receiver Section 3.4
 Power of Sale
 9




---



##### 



Discontinuance of Proceedings and Restoration of the Parties
 10




---



##### 



Suits to Protect the Premises
 Remedies Cumulative
 ARTICLE 4.
 Successors and Assigns
 Notices.
 No Implied Waivers
 11




---



##### 



Power of Agent to Reconvey or Consent
 Enforcement
 Assignment
 Counterparts
 Amendments
 Severability
 12




---



##### 



Captions
 Governing Law
 No Merger .
 ARTICLE 5.
 Principle of Construction .
 Illinois Mortgage Foreclosure Law .
   13




---



##### 



Use of Proceeds .
 Revolving Credit Agreement .
 WAIVER OF CERTAIN RIGHTS
 14




---



##### 



15




---



##### 



CLAIRES BOUTIQUES, INC., a Colorado
corporationBy:
    /s/ Rebecca OrandName:
    Rebecca OrandTitle:
    Vice President and Secretary




---



##### 



EXHIBIT A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION




---



#####
217.208-70 Additional clauses. ( a ) Use the basic or the alternate of the clause at 252.217-7000, Exercise of Option to Fulfill Foreign Military Sales Commitments, in solicitations and contracts when an option may be used for foreign military sales requirements. Do not use the basic or the alternate of this clause in contracts for establishment or replenishment of DoD inventories or stocks, or acquisitions made under DoD cooperative logistics support arrangements. ( 1 ) Use the basic clause when the foreign military sales country is known at the time of solicitation or award.
( 2 ) Use the alternate I clause when the foreign military sale country is not known at the time of solicitation or award.
( b ) When a surge option is needed in support of industrial capability production planning, use the clause at 252.217-7001, Surge Option, in solicitations and contracts. ( 1 ) Insert the percentage or quantity of increase the option represents in paragraph (a) of the clause to ensure adequate quantities are available to meet item requirements.
( 2 ) Change 30 days in paragraphs (b)(2) and (d)(1) to longer periods, if appropriate.
( 3 ) Change the 24-month period in paragraph (c)(3), if appropriate.
[63 FR 11529, Mar. 9, 1998, as amended at 71 FR 27642, May 12, 2006; 79 FR 65593, Nov. 5, 2014; 83 FR 62503, Dec. 4, 2018]
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.1


                           [COMERICA BANK LETTERHEAD]



October 19, 2001



Mr. W.T. ZurSchmiede, Jr.
Chairman & Chief Executive Officer
Federal Screw Works
20229 Nine Mile Road
St. Clair Shores, MI 48080-1775

Dear Mr. ZurSchmiede,

Per your request dated September 4, 2001 and pursuant to Section 2.13 of the
Revolving Credit and Term Loan Agreement between Federal Screw Works and
Comerica Bank, the Bank has approved the one year extension for the Revolving
Credit Facility and Term Loan option. The new maturity dates for the facilities
are October 31, 2004 and October 31, 2006, respectively.

Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions.


Best Regards,


/s/ Robert M. Ramirez
Robert M. Ramirez


cc: Wade Plaskey
II 

Calendar No. 313 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 931 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

4910 Brighton Boulevard in Denver, Colorado, as the ‘‘George Sakato 

Post Office’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 25, 2017 

Mr. GARDNER (for himself and Mr. BENNET) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

FEBRUARY 15, 2018 

Reported by Mr. JOHNSON, without amendment 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 4910 Brighton Boulevard in Denver, Colorado, 

as the ‘‘George Sakato Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. GEORGE SAKATO POST OFFICE. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 4910 Brighton Boulevard in 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 931 RS

1 Denver, Colorado, shall be known and designated as the 

2 ‘‘George Sakato Post Office’’. 

3 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg4 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

5 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

6 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘George Sakato Post 

7 Office’’. 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS

sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 313 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 931 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States PostOffice’’. Denver, Colorado, as the ‘‘George Sakato Post al Service located at 4910 Brighton Boulevard in 

FEBRUARY 15, 2018 

Reported without amendment 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
PUBLIC LAW 111–149—MAR. 25, 2010 124 STAT. 1025 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 3433: 

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 111–296 (Comm. on Natural Resources). 

SENATE REPORTS: No. 111–158 (Comm. on Environment and Public Works). 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD: 

Vol. 155 (2009): Oct. 13, considered and passed House. 

Vol. 156 (2010): Mar. 9, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 111–149 

111th Congress 

An Act 

To amend the North American Wetlands Conservation Act to establish requirements 

regarding payment of the non-Federal share of the costs of wetlands conservation 

projects in Canada that are funded under that Act, and for other purposes. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. PAYMENT OF NON-FEDERAL SHARE OF PROJECTS IN 

MEXICO AND CANADA UNDER NORTH AMERICAN WETLANDS CONSERVATION ACT. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 8(b)(3) of the North American Wetlands Conservation Act (16 U.S.C. 4407(b)(3)) is amended to read 

as follows: 

‘‘(3) The non-Federal share of the United States contribution 

to the costs of such projects may not be derived from Federal 

grant programs. In the case of a project carried out in Canada 

or Mexico, the non-Federal share of the costs of the project may 

include cash contributions from non-United States sources that 

are used to pay costs of the project. In the case of a project 

carried out in Canada, funds from Canadian sources may comprise 

up to 50 percent of the non-Federal share of the costs of the 

project.’’. 

(b) APPLICATION.—The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 

apply with respect to any approved and active wetlands conservation project (as that term is used in section 8(b)(1) of such Act) 

carried out with assistance provided under such Act, including 

such a project approved before the date of the enactment of this 

Act. 

Approved March 25, 2010. 

16 USC 4407 

note. 

Mar. 25, 2010 

[H.R. 3433] 


ccoleman on DSK8P6SHH1PROD with PUBLIC LAWS
**Exhibit 31.2** **Certifications**     I, Peter B. Knepper, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this annual report on    Form 10-K    of MDI, Inc.;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any    untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material    fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the    circumstances under which such statements were made, not    misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and    other financial information included in this report, fairly    present in all material respects the financial condition,    results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,    and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I    are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure    controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act    Rules 13a-15(e)    and    15d-15(e))    for the registrant and have:     a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or    caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed    under our supervision, to ensure that material information    relating to the registrant, including its consolidated    subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those    entities, particularly during the period in which this report is    being prepared;     b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s    disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report    our conclusions about the effectiveness of the controls and    procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report    based on such evaluation; and     c. Disclosed in this report any change in the    registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that    occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter    that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to    materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over    financial reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I    have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal    control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s    auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board    of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in    the design or operation of internal control over financial    reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the    registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and    report financial information; and     b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves    management or other employees who have a significant role in the    registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.      By     /s/  Peter B. Knepper    Peter B. Knepper    Interim Chief Financial Officer     Dated: March 31, 2006
EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of EMEX Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Walter
W. Tyler, acting Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

         /s/  Walter W. Tyler
         ---------------------------------------------
         President and Chief Executive Officer
         August  19, 2002
#### 1316.103 Negotiating contract type.
17.803 Applicability. Reverse auction processes shall not be used for— ( a ) Design-build construction contracts (see 36.104);
( b ) Procurements for architect-engineer services subject to 40 U.S.C. chapter 11 (see 36.601);
( c ) Procurements using sealed bidding procedures (see part 14); or
( d ) Acquisition of personal protective equipment, in accordance with— ( 1 ) Sections 813 and 814 of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year (FY) 2017 (Pub. L. 114-328);
( 2 ) Section 882 of the NDAA for FY 2018 (Pub. L. 115-91); and
( 3 ) Section 880 of the John S. McCain NDAA for FY 2019 (Pub. L. 115-232, 41 U.S.C. 3701 note).
#### 1328.203-7 Exclusion of individual sureties.

The designee authorized to exclude an individual from acting as a surety on bonds submitted by offerors on procurements by the executive branch of the Federal Government is set forth in CAM 1301.70.
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

ILLINOIS TOOL WORKS, INC.,

Appellant

v.

TERMAX COMPANY,

Cross-Appellant

______________________

2023-1252, 2023-1254

______________________

Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark 

Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2021-

00724.

______________________

ON MOTION

______________________

Before DYK, REYNA, and CHEN, Circuit Judges.

DYK, Circuit Judge.

O R D E R

Illinois Tool Works, Inc. moves to voluntarily dismiss 

its appeal, No. 2023-1252, and to dismiss Termax Company’s cross-appeal, No. 2023-1254. Termax opposes dismissal of its cross-appeal. We grant both motions.

Case: 23-1252 Document: 30 Page: 1 Filed: 03/08/2023
2 ILLINOIS TOOL WORKS, INC. v. TERMAX CO.

Termax appeals from the Patent Trial and Appeal 

Board’s final written decision in this inter partes review, 

which agreed with Termax that all challenged claims of Illinois Tool Works’ U.S. Patent No. 10,683,882 are unpatentable. We have employed the familiar rule that “the 

prevailing party in a lower tribunal cannot ordinarily seek 

relief in the appellate court” to appeals from the Board. 

SkyHawke Techs., LLC v. Deca Int’l Corp., 828 F.3d 1373, 

1375 (Fed. Cir. 2016) (citation omitted). We see nothing 

that warrants departing from that rule here.

In opposing dismissal, Termax contends that the Board 

erred in its construction of certain claim limitations that

have also been incorporated into Illinois Tool Works’ new 

patent. Termax hopes that a favorable decision on its claim 

construction arguments here will collaterally estop Illinois 

Tool Works from asserting those newly issued claims. But 

in SkyHawke, we rejected a similar attempt to appeal from 

a Board’s claim construction when the appellant did “not 

seek to alter the judgment of the Board.” Id. There, as 

here, Termax “is merely trying to preempt an unfavorable 

outcome” as to some other potential proceeding regarding 

Illinois Tool Works’ new patent “that may or may not arise 

in the future,” and, if such an outcome does arise, Termax 

may appeal “at that time.” Id. at 1377.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The motions are granted, and the appeals are dismissed.

Case: 23-1252 Document: 30 Page: 2 Filed: 03/08/2023
ILLINOIS TOOL WORKS, INC. v. TERMAX CO. 3

(2) Each side shall bear its own costs. 

March 8, 2023

 Date

FOR THE COURT

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

ISSUED AS A MANDATE (as to Appeal No. 2023-1252 

only): March 8, 2023

Case: 23-1252 Document: 30 Page: 3 Filed: 03/08/2023
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 899 Engrossed Amendment House (EAH)]

<DOC>
                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                         July 16, 2018.
    Resolved, That the bill from the Senate (S. 899) entitled ``An Act 
to amend title 38, United States Code, to ensure that the requirements 
that new Federal employees who are veterans with service-connected 
disabilities are provided leave for purposes of undergoing medical 
treatment for such disabilities apply to certain employees of the 
Veterans Health Administration, and for other purposes.'', do pass with 
the following

                              AMENDMENTS:

            Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert:

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Veterans Providing Healthcare 
Transition Improvement Act''.

SEC. 2. DISABLED VETERAN LEAVE FOR HEALTH-CARE PROFESSIONALS IN 
              VETERANS HEALTH ADMINISTRATION.

    (a) In General.--Section 6329(d)(1) of title 5, United States Code, 
is amended to read as follows:
            ``(1) the term `employee' has the meaning given such term 
        in section 2105, and includes--
                    ``(A) an officer or employee of the United States 
                Postal Service or the Postal Regulatory Commission; and
                    ``(B) notwithstanding subsection (a) of section 
                7421 of title 38, an individual occupying a position 
                listed in subsection (b) of such section;''.
    (b) Applicability.--With respect to a position listed in section 
7421(b) of title 38, United States Code, the amendment made by 
subsection (a) shall apply to any individual appointed to such a 
position on or after the date of enactment of this Act.

            Amend the title so as to read: ``An Act to amend title 5, 
        United States Code, to ensure that the requirements that new 
        Federal employees who are veterans with service-connected 
        disabilities are provided leave for purposes of undergoing 
        medical treatment for such disabilities apply to certain 
        employees of the Veterans Health Administration.''.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
115th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                 S. 899

_______________________________________________________________________

                               AMENDMENTS
```
Exhibit 23


                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS





         We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (No. 33-36004) of Public Storage, Inc., formerly Storage
Equities, Inc., pertaining to the 1990 Stock Option Plan, the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (No. 33-55541) pertaining to the 1994 Stock Option Plan,
the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-13463) pertaining to the 1996
Stock Option and Incentive Plan, the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No.
333-75327) pertaining to the 1994 Share Incentive Plan, the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-50270) pertaining to the PS 401(k)/Profit Sharing
Plan, the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-52400) pertaining to the
2000 Non-Executive/Non-Director Stock Option and Incentive Plan, the
Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-81041) and in the related prospectus
and the Registration Statement on Form S-4 (No. 333-86899) ) and in the related
prospectus and the Registration Statement on Form S-4 (No. 333-84126) and in the
related prospectus of our report dated February 22, 2002 with respect to the
consolidated financial statements and schedule of Public Storage, Inc. included
in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for 2001 filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission.

                                                               ERNST & YOUNG LLP

March 29, 2002
Los Angeles, California
**Sunday, March 06, 2016 Petition for Exemption**  Brandon Roberts Manager, Airmen and Airspace Rules Divis ion U.S. Department of Transportation, 800 Independence Ave. S. W. Washington, DC 20591 Mr. Roberts. To keep our lines of communications open and keep this request open I would like to add more information. On occasion we subcontract our plane s out to the military and their special ops groups. These groups include, but are not limited to; th e Navy Seals and Para Rescue teams

. In their operations all they need is a ground refer ence to determine the correct spot over the DZ to j ump. We are requesting the same leeway regarding cloud clearances. The military

is granted this exemption despite the infrequency of their training and the unfamiliarity

that man y of their jumpers have at our dropzone. We are requesting the same exemption for our own staff who each conduct hundreds of jumps a ye ar at our facilit y with no incidents. Please briefl y read over in the Australian Jumping through cloud proce dures pages 17. 18. & 19. There is some interesting information there. Thank you for taking the time to consider our request. Sincerel y, Randy Pacheco Chief Pilot/USPA Safety & Training Advisor 68

- 615 Farrington Hwy . 14A Waialua, HI 96791 (916) 765

- 6516 emailrandy pacheco@yahoo.com ATP # 3134763 other pilots to be added later
# FY03 GA Loan Volume

# Quarterly

# Historical