alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
5/27/10 Meeting with: Texas Aggregates & Concrete Association, Headwaters Resources, 

and Hallett Materials 

At the Office of Resource Conservation and Recovery (ORCR), PY North 

3 industry representatives present: 

Michael K. Stewart, Texas Aggregates & Concrete Association (Tel: 512-451-5100) 

Bob Sparacino, Headwaters Resources (Tel: 979-255-2513) 

Frank Johnson, Hallett Materials, Porter Texas 77365 

EPA/ORCR Staff present: 

Alexander Livnat 

Jesse Miller 

Steve Souders 

Industry is aware of the 2 proposed options for regulating the disposal of coal combustion 

residuals (CCRs); from their prospective, as long as the disposable portion of CCRs will be 

regulated under Subtitle C, the stigma won’t be eliminated even if CCRs are considered Special 

Waste rather than Hazardous Waste. 

Industry was adamant about how utilities in their region [Texas Utilities (TXU) and Lower 

Colorado River Authority (LCRA)] will not provide CCRs for beneficial use purposes if the 

Subtitle C option is selected. 

- It would be too risky and there would be too much liability under Subtitle C. 

- They will not allow CCRs to leave their facilities and control. 

Industry raised the issue of the regulatory status of dust that is generated when fly ash-containing 

concrete is crushed for reuse. 

EPA staff reiterated that, as proposed, beneficial uses would not be subject to regulations under 

either of the proposed options 

- EPA Staff stated that if a Subtitle C option is finalized, coal ash would be listed under 

a new waste category as a “special waste.” 

Industry stated that 20 – 30% of fly ash is a component of concrete, and that Texas consumes 

more fly ash than is currently generated in the State. If regulated under Subtitle C, then that 

percentage will have to be replaced by cement. This will cause: 

- More imported cement from countries where its manufacturing is poorly regulated 

- Increased costs 

- Increased greenhouse gases. 

Industry stated that Texas utilities have phased out wet disposal.
100 Knot Stop, LLC P.O. Box 2032 Adak, Alaska 99546 (907)592-7867
March 12, 2015

Mr. Kevin Schlemmer Office of Aviation Analysis U.S. Department of Transportation 120o New JerseyAvenue, S.E. Washington, D.C. 20590

RE: Essential Air Service for Adak, Alaska, Docket DOT-OST-2000-8556
Dear Mr. Schlemmer, On behalf of the owners of ioo Knot Stop, LLC, Adak's only grocery store, we are supporting Alaska Airlines' proposal to continue providing service to Adak as documented in the aforementioned docket. Our business is directly dependent on Alaska Airlines' jet service to Adak. Without the service provided by Alaska we would be unable to manage our inventory at acceptable levels. We have no other option of transporting critical inventory for our customers, as well as our general operating needs, as we have no scheduled barge service. We also have no ability to participate in the Bypass Mail program and are grateful not only for the regular lift capacity Alaska provides with its jet aircraft, but also the ability to reliably transport our perishable goods which come as air freight. We appreciate the commitment and service Alaska has and will continue to provide by selecting their proposal to continue providing essential air service for Adak. Not only do our customers rely on their service for their own shipments, but they also rely on Alaska's service so that we can also provide them with goods and services. Thank you for your consideration of our comments. Sincerely,

Layton J. Lockett Managing Member
#### BUTTERLY v. DEERING (two cases).

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

November 13, 1903.)

Action by James N. Butterly against James A. Deering.

No opinion. Motion denied.
Appeal No. 74-163.

#### Adolph DiMario *v.*Ralph W. Heeks *et ux.*

*Abar tuno & Chisholm, Thomas F. Fogarty, Jr.,*for plaintiff-appellant. *Alton W. Wiley,*for defendants-appellees.

Motion of defendants-appellees to affirm the judgment of the Superior Court pursuant to Rule 16 (g) is denied.
#### 208.7304 Refined precious metals.

See PGI 208.7304 for a list of refined precious metals managed by DSCP.

[71 FR 39005, July 11, 2006]
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted), I, Barry M. Yantis, President and Chief Executive Officer of Chase General
Corporation, certify,



| | (1) | The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2003, to which this certification is attached as Exhibit 32 (the Periodic Report),
fully complies with the requirement of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of the period covered by the Periodic
Report and results of operations of the Company for the period covered by the Periodic Report.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                       
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                       
|/s/    BARRY M. YANTIS                                                                 
|                                                                                       
|Barry M. Yantis President, Chief Executive Officer, Treasurer and Chairman of the Board



Dated: February 11, 2004



19
#### Joseph Barbato et al., Respondents, v. Ida Tuosto et al., Appellants.

Motion for a stay denied in accordance with memorandum. Memorandum: It appears from the papers submitted that the defendant is now in default in answering. The motion for a stay is denied without prejudice to the right of defendant to apply to Special Term to be relieved of his present default and for an extension of time to answer and for such further relief as Special Term may deem proper.
#### 1816.406 Contract clauses.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 901 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 901

 To prohibit any reduction in the amount of the per diem allowance to 
    which members of the Army, Navy, Air Force, and Marine Corps or 
 civilian employees of the Department of Defense are entitled based on 
the duration of temporary duty assignments or official travel, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 7, 2017

  Ms. Hirono (for herself, Mr. Rounds, Ms. Cantwell, Ms. Hassan, Mrs. 
  Murray, Mrs. Shaheen, Mr. Schatz, Mr. Warner, Ms. Collins, and Mr. 
Kaine) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 
                   to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To prohibit any reduction in the amount of the per diem allowance to 
    which members of the Army, Navy, Air Force, and Marine Corps or 
 civilian employees of the Department of Defense are entitled based on 
the duration of temporary duty assignments or official travel, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON PER DIEM ALLOWANCE REDUCTIONS BASED ON THE 
              DURATION OF TEMPORARY DUTY ASSIGNMENT OR CIVILIAN TRAVEL.

    (a) Members.--Section 474(d)(3) of title 37, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following new sentence: ``The 
Secretary of a military department shall not alter the amount of the 
per diem allowance, or the maximum amount of reimbursement, for a 
locality based on the duration of the temporary duty assignment in the 
locality of a member of the armed forces under the jurisdiction of the 
Secretary.''.
    (b) Civilian Employees.--Section 5702(a)(2) of title 5, United 
States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new 
sentence: ``The Secretary of Defense shall not alter the amount of the 
per diem allowance, or the maximum amount of reimbursement, for a 
locality based on the duration of the travel in the locality of an 
employee of the Department.''.
    (c) Repeals.--
            (1) Existing policy and regulations.--The policy, and any 
        regulations issued pursuant to such policy, implemented by the 
        Secretary of the Department of Defense on November 1, 2014, 
        with respect to reductions in per diem allowances based on 
        duration of temporary duty assignment or civilian travel shall 
        have no force or effect.
            (2) Attempted statutory fix.--Section 672 of the National 
        Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 (Public Law 114-
        328; 37 U.S.C. 474 note; 130 Stat. 2178) is repealed.
                                 <all>
```
#### 2132.171 Contract clause.

The clause at 2152.232-70 shall be inserted in all FEGLI Program contracts.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jose Maseda, Appellant.

[831 NYS2d 710]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Robert H. Straus, J.), rendered October 29, 2004, convicting defendant, after a nonjury trial, of two counts of repeated failure to file personal income and earnings taxes in violation of Tax Law § 1802 (a), and sentencing him to a term of five years’ probation with restitution in the amount of $7,447 and community service, and judgment of resentence, same court and Justice, rendered March 17, 2006, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of violation of probation, resentencing him to a term of six months, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. The evidence established that defendant failed to pay income taxes and file returns for the years charged and that he owed money for each of those years. Defendant clearly evinced the requisite intent to evade payment of tax. His own testimony established that his purpose, or conscious objective *(see*Penal Law § 15.05 [1]), was to not pay taxes. The record contradicts his claim that he honestly believed himself to be exempt from taxation *(see People v Antoine,*298 AD2d 306 [2002]). Defendant filed several documents including withholding forms that he knew to be false, and his testimony warranted an inference that he did not take seriously his various bizarre theories concerning tax laws. While defendant may disagree with existing tax laws, or with their generally accepted interpretations, there was no evidence that he honestly misunderstood his duties under those laws as they currently stand *(see Cheek v United States,*498 US 192, 202 n 8 [1991]). Concur—Andrias, J.P, Friedman, Marlow, Williams and Catterson, JJ.
#### 1515.000 Scope of part.

This part implements and supplements FAR part 15. It prescribes the Environmental Protection Agency policies and procedures for contracting for supplies and services by negotiation.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                                 0
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                       51,143,361
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                   4,556,565
<MORTGAGE>                                  10,434,844
<REAL-ESTATE>                                7,669,296
<TOTAL-INVEST>                              77,828,420
<CASH>                                       7,710,155
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                   0
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                       4,509,974
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             138,212,681
<POLICY-LOSSES>                             74,281,374
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                  0
<POLICY-OTHER>                                 727,379
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                        1,858,932
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                             27,129,062
<COMMON>                                     8,594,046
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                  13,324,547
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               138,212,681
<PREMIUMS>                                   5,853,030
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                          6,679,704
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                             332,648
<OTHER-INCOME>                              13,252,969
<BENEFITS>                                   6,168,718
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                  1,149,510
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                                 0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,259,464
<INCOME-TAX>                                   728,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,531,464
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,551,780
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.42
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.42
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
213.201 General. ( f ) Notwithstanding FAR 13.201(f), apply the prohibition at 223.7402 to purchases at or below the micro-purchase threshold.
( g ) See PGI 213.201(g) for guidance on use of the higher micro-purchase thresholds prescribed in FAR 13.201(g) to support a declared contingency operation or to facilitate defense against or recovery from nuclear, biological, chemical, or radiological attack.
( j ) Do not procure or obtain, or extend or renew a contract to procure or obtain, any equipment, system, or service to carry out covered missions that use covered defense telecommunications equipment or services as a substantial or essential component of any system, or as critical technology as part of any system, unless a waiver is granted. (See subpart 204.21.)
[81 FR 53045, Aug. 11, 2016, as amended at 84 FR 72237, Dec. 31, 2019; 88 FR 67606, Sept. 29, 2023]
Exhibit 10AA

                                                              September 20, 1999

Mr. Michael J. Madden
10 Finn Court
Mahwah, NJ 07430

Dear Mr. Madden:

Toys "R" Us, Inc. (the "Company") regretfully accepts your resignation from all
officer positions you hold in the Company, its subsidiaries and affiliates,
effective as of September 24, 1999 (the "Resignation Date"). The employment
relationship between the Company and you will terminate on the Resignation Date.

In consideration of your agreement to continue to be bound by the restrictions
set forth in Sections 11(b), 11(c), 11(f) and 13(e) of the Retention Agreement
dated as of May 1, 1997 between you and the Company (the "Retention Agreement")
through January 31, 2002, the Company agrees as follows:

      (a)   As soon as practicable following January 31, 2000, the Company will
            calculate the value of your interest in the Company's Supplemental
            Executive Retirement Plan (the "SERP"), including the Company's
            January 31, 2000 notional contribution.

      (b)   As soon as practicable after January 31, 2002, the Company will
            calculate the value of your interest in the SERP and pay you an
            equal amount in cash, provided you have complied with the
            restrictions set forth in Sections 11(b), 11(c), 11(f) and 13(e) of
            the Retention Agreement through January 31, 2002.

      (c)   At all times, your interest in the SERP will be administered in
            accordance with the SERP and the Grantor Trust established by the
            Company.

Except as provided in this letter or as otherwise provided by applicable law,
you will not be entitled to any further benefits or payments from the Company
from and after the Resignation Date. Except as provided herein with respect to
Sections 11(b), 11(c), 11(f) and 13(e) of the Retention Agreement, all rights
and obligations of you and the Company under the Retention Agreement and any
other agreement, arrangement or understanding between you and the Company are
hereby cancelled and terminated as of the Resignation Date.


<PAGE>

Mr. Michael J. Madden
September 20, 1999
Page 2

If the foregoing satisfactorily reflects the understanding between us, please
sign and return the enclosed copy of this letter, which will then constitute our
agreement with respect to the foregoing matters. This letter may be executed in
two or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of
which together shall constitute one and the same instrument.

                                                    Very truly yours,

                                                    /s/ Roger C. Gaston

                                                    Roger C. Gaston
                                                    Senior Vice President
                                                    Human Resources

Accepted and Agreed:

   /s/ Michael J. Madden
----------------------------
       Michael J. Madden
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


  

  Exhibit
   10(i)

  

 CONSENT OF
   INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’

  

 To the Board of
   Directors of

 Massachusetts Mutual
   Life Insurance Company

  

         We consent to the
   inclusion in this Post-Effective Amendment No. 19 to Registration Statement
   No. 2-75413 on Form N-4 of our reports dated February 1, 2000 on our audit
   of Variable Annuity Fund 4 and Flex Annuity IV (Qualified) Segments of
   Massachusetts Mutual Variable Annuity Separate Account 1, February 14, 2000
   on our audit of the Flex Annuity IV (Non-qualified) Segment of Massachusetts
   Mutual Variable Annuity Separate Account 2 as of December 31, 1999 and for
   the year then ended, and of our report dated February 1, 2000, on our audit
   of the statutory financial statements of Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance
   Company as of December 31, 1999 and for the year then ended, which includes
   explanatory paragraphs relating to the use of statutory accounting
   practices, which differ from generally accepted accounting principles. We
   also consent to the reference to our Firm under the caption
   “Experts” in the Statement of Additional Information.

  

 DELOITTE
 & TOUCHE LLP
 

  

 Hartford,
   Connecticut

 April 24,
   2000
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-27-1996
<CASH>                                          21,294
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   56,344
<ALLOWANCES>                                       997
<INVENTORY>                                     91,862
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               186,475
<PP&E>                                         394,167
<DEPRECIATION>                                 270,433
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 328,304
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           56,366
<BONDS>                                         15,400
<COMMON>                                        21,772
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     186,086
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   328,304
<SALES>                                        286,462
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               286,462
<CGS>                                          206,292
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  260,801
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (737)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    44
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,015
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 25,339
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,475
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             17,864
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    17,864
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    $1.11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    $1.11
        

</TABLE>