alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 655 

To exempt certain 16- and 17-year-old individuals employed in logging 

operations from child labor laws. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 15, 2017 

Mr. RISCH (for himself and Mr. KING) introduced the following bill; which was 

read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, 

and Pensions 

A BILL 

To exempt certain 16- and 17-year-old individuals employed 

in logging operations from child labor laws. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Future Logging Ca5 reers Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. CHILD LABOR LAW EXEMPTIONS FOR LOGGING OP7 ERATIONS. 

8 The Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 

9 201 et seq.) is amended— 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 655 IS

1 (1) in section 3 (29 U.S.C. 203), by adding at 

2 the end the following: 

3 ‘‘(z) ‘Logging operation’— 

4 ‘‘(1) means — 

5 ‘‘(A) a mechanized operation; 

6 ‘‘(B) the bucking or converting of timber into 

7 logs, poles, ties, bolts, pulpwood, chemical wood, ex8 celsior wood, cordwood, fence posts, or similar prod9 ucts; 

10 ‘‘(C) the collecting, skidding, yarding, loading, 

11 transporting, or unloading of such products in con12 nection with the activities described in this para13 graph; 

14 ‘‘(D) the constructing, repairing, or maintain15 ing of— 

16 ‘‘(i) roads or camps used in connection 

17 with the activities described in this paragraph; 

18 or 

19 ‘‘(ii) machinery or equipment used in the 

20 activities described in this paragraph; or 

21 ‘‘(E) any other work performed in connection 

22 with the activities described in this paragraph; and 

23 ‘‘(2) does not include the manual use of chainsaws 

24 to fell or process timber or the use of cable skidders to 

25 bring the timber to the landing. 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 655 IS

1 ‘‘(aa) ‘Mechanized operation’— 

2 ‘‘(1) means the felling, skidding, yarding, loading, or 

3 processing of timber by equipment other than manually 

4 operated chainsaws or cable skidders; and 

5 ‘‘(2) includes the use of whole tree processors, cut6 to-length processors, stroke boom delimbers, wheeled and 

7 track feller-bunchers, pull-through delimbers, wheeled and 

8 track forwarders, chippers, grinders, mechanical 

9 debarkers, wheeled and track grapple skidders, yarders, 

10 bulldozers, excavators, and log loaders.’’; and 

11 (2) in section 13(c) (29 U.S.C. 213(c)), by add12 ing at the end the following: 

13 ‘‘(8) The provisions of section 12 relating to child 

14 labor shall apply to an employee who is 16 or 17 years 

15 old employed in a logging operation in an occupation that 

16 the Secretary of Labor finds and declares to be particu17 larly hazardous for the employment of children ages 16 

18 or 17, except where such employee is employed by his par19 ent or by a person standing in the place of his parent in 

20 a logging operation owned or operated by such parent or 

21 person.’’. 

Æ 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
P140395.en1

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT

PMN: 14-0395

Post-Focus Draft Revision 1 8/7/2014

ENGINEER: Hall \ REC

Page 1P140395.en1

SAT (concerns) (03/14/2014):

Related Cases and Misc SAT Info:

Migration to groundwater: Negligible

PBT rating: P2B1T1

Health: 1-2 Inhalation Eco: 2 Water (All releases to water with a CC = 18 ppb)

Page 2P140395.en1

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 1-2B

NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS:

Generated by the 09/30/2013 version of ChemSTEER.

POLLUTION PREVENTION CONSIDERATIONS:

None.

EXPOSURE-BASED REVIEW: No

Page 3P140395.en1

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT

PMN: 14-0395

Page 4P140395.en1

Page 5P140395.en1

Page 6P140395.en1

Page 7P140395.en1

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT

PMN: 14-0395

Page 8P140395.en1

Page 9P140395.en1

Page 10P140395.en1

Page 11P140395.en1

Page 12
201.201-1 The two councils. ( c ) The composition and operation of the DAR Council is prescribed in DoD Instruction 5000.35, Defense Acquisition Regulations (DAR) System.
( d ) ( i ) Departments and agencies process proposed revisions of FAR or DFARS through channels to the Director of the DAR Council. Process the proposed revision as a memorandum in the following format, addressed to the Director, DAR Council via email at *osd.pentagon.ousd-a-s.mbx.dfars@mail.mil .* I. PROBLEM: Succinctly state the problem created by current FAR and/or DFARS coverage and describe the factual and/or legal reasons necessitating the change to the regulation. II. RECOMMENDATION: Identify the FAR and/or DFARS citations to be revised. Attach as TAB A a copy of the text of the existing coverage, conformed to include the proposed additions and deletions. Indicate deleted coverage with dashed lines through the current words being deleted and insert proposed language in brackets at the appropriate locations within the existing coverage. If the proposed deleted portion is extensive, it may be outlined by lines forming a box with diagonal lines drawn connecting the corners. III. DISCUSSION: Include a complete, convincing explanation of why the change is necessary and how the recommended revision will solve the problem. Address advantages and disadvantages of the proposed revision, as well as any cost or administrative impact on Government activities and contractors. Identify any potential impact of the change on automated systems, e.g., automated financial and procurement systems. Provide any other background information that would be helpful in explaining the issue. IV. COLLATERALS: Address the need for public comment (FAR 1.301(b) and subpart 1.5), the Paperwork Reduction Act, and the Regulatory Flexibility Act (FAR 1.301(c)). V. DEVIATIONS: If a recommended revision of DFARS is a FAR deviation, identify the deviation and include under separate TAB a justification for the deviation that addresses the requirements of 201.402(2). The justification should be in the form of a memorandum for the Principal Director, Defense Pricing, Contracting, and Acquisition Policy, Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (Acquisition and Sustainment).
( ii ) The public may offer proposed revisions of FAR or DFARS by submission of a memorandum, in the format (including all of the information) prescribed in paragraph (d)(i) of this subsection, to the Director of the DAR Council.
[56 FR 36284, July 31, 1991, as amended at 60 FR 61591, Nov. 30, 1995; 61 FR 50451, Sept. 26, 1996; 63 FR 11528, Mar. 9, 1998; 65 FR 6552, Feb. 10, 2000; 68 FR 7439, Feb. 14, 2003; 73 FR 70906, Nov. 24, 2008; 77 FR 76937, Dec. 31, 2012; 78 FR 13543, Feb. 28, 2013; 88 FR 73234, Oct. 25, 2023; 89 FR 60830, July 29, 2024]
#### 2001.303 Public participation.

FAR 1.301 and section 22 of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act, as amended (41 U.S.C. 418b) require rulemaking for substantive acquisition rules, but allow discretion in the matter for other than significant issues meeting the stated criteria. Accordingly, the NRCAR has been promulgated and may be revised from time to time in accordance with FAR 1.301. This procedure for significant subject matter generally involves issuing a notice of proposed rulemaking that invites public comment, review and analysis of comments received, and publication of a final rule. The final rule includes a discussion of the public comments received and describes any changes made as a result of the comments.
**U.S. Department of Education Negotiated Rulemaking**

**Accreditation and Innovation**

**Session II**

**February 19-22, 2019, 9:00am – 5:00 pm**

**The U.S. Department of Education**

**Potomac Center Plaza (UCP) Auditorium**

**550 12th St. SW**

**Washington, DC 20202**

**DRAFT AGENDA**

Review of Draft Agenda

Review Meeting Summary for Session I

Discussion of Proposed Regulatory Language

Reports from Subcommittees – February 20 – 21

Additional Discussion of Proposed Regulatory Language

Next steps 

· Session II Meeting Summary 

· Subcommittees:  March 11-12, 2019 

· Main Committee Meeting 3: March 25-29, 2019
FY 2018 AGENCY FINANCIAL REPORT | U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION 115

FRAUD REDUCTION REPORT

The Department continues to participate actively 

with OMB and other agencies in the governmentwide workgroup that is collaborating on an 

implementation plan for the Fraud Reduction and Data 

Analytics Act (FRDAA) of 2015. The Department will 

continue to work with OMB to implement the FRDAA.

The Department recognizes the challenges that often 

surround fraud risk management and is taking action to 

address each challenge. These challenges include limited 

resources to conduct fraud risk management activities 

and difficulties in definitively separating fraud from other 

negative outcomes.

The Department is exploring ways to refine or enhance 

its business processes to be in a better position to define, 

deter, detect, and take action on fraud. For Title IV 

programs, Federal Student Aid (FSA) has established 

a Fraud Risk Group (FRG) within its Enterprise Risk 

Management Office to build capacity and expertise for 

and to dedicate resources to fraud risk identification 

and mitigation. In 2018, responsibility for receiving, 

processing, and taking action on fraud referrals from the 

Department’s Office of the Inspector General (OIG) was 

transferred from the Finance Office to FRG. 

FRG launched a new initiative to implement workflow 

and case management capabilities to perform 

analysis of all OIG fraud referrals within the existing 

Customer Engagement Management Systems (CEMS) 

infrastructure. This will enable more comprehensive 

analysis across all OIG fraud referrals and provide 

better tracking of referrals and possible recoveries 

of resultant improper payments. This common and 

interactive case processing tool will also reduce fraud 

review/case processing time and provide analytics to 

allow better fraud detection and prevention. FSA is 

also exploring ways to leverage data analytics better to 

detect and combat fraud in operations. Additionally, the 

Department has catalogued internal controls related to 

fraud prevention and detection, to include 45 detective 

and 103 preventive controls related to its grant programs 

and administrative payments.

To combat improper use of federal funding under the 

Every Student Succeeds Act, the Department requires that 

each recipient and sub-recipient publically display the 

contact information of the Department’s OIG hotline 

to facilitate the reporting of suspected improper use of 

ESSA funding and that each recipient and sub-recipient 

provides assurance of truthfulness and accuracy of the 

information they provide in applications and in response 

to monitoring and compliance reviews.
Exhibit 32.2





Certification of the Chief Financial Officer


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the


Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002








I, Michael S. Sarner, Chief Financial Officer of Capital Southwest Corporation, certify that, to my knowledge:


1. The Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2020, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 2, 2020 (“accompanied report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


2. The information contained in the accompanied report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of Capital Southwest Corporation.


Date:  November 2, 2020By:/s/ Michael S. SarnerMichael S. SarnerChief Financial Officer
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Effect of Material Heat Treatment on Fatigue Crack Initiation in Austenitic Stainless Steels in LWR Environments (NUREG/CR-6878, ANL-03/35)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-6878 (PDF - 23.0 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:**December 2003**Date Published:**July 2005

**Prepared by:**O.K. Chopra, B. Alexandreanu, and W.J. ShackArgonne National Laboratory9700 South Cass AvenueArgonne, Illinois 60439

P. Krishnaswamy, D. Rudland, and G.M. WilkowskiEngineering Mechanics Corporation of ColumbusColumbus, Ohio 43221

William H. Cullen, Jr., NRC Project Manager

**Prepared for:**Division of Engineering TechnologyOffice of Nuclear Regulatory ResearchU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

NRC Job Code Y6388

Availability Notice

## Abstract

The ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code provides rules for the design of Class 1 components of nuclear power plants. Figures I-9.1 through I-9.6 of Appendix I to Section III of the Code specify design curves for applicable structural materials. However, the effects of light water reactor (LWR) coolant environments are not explicitly addressed by the Code design curves. The existing fatigue strain-vs.-life (ε-N) data illustrate potentially significant effects of LWR coolant environments on the fatigue resistance of pressure vessel and piping steels. Under certain environmental and loading conditions, fatigue lives of austenitic stainless steels (SSs) can be a factor of 20 lower in water than in air. This report presents experimental data on the effect of heat treatment on fatigue crack initiation in austenitic Type 304 SS in LWR coolant environments. A detailed metallographic examination of fatigue test specimens was performed to characterize the crack morphology and fracture morphology. The key material, loading, and environmental parameters and their effect on the fatigue life of these steels are also described. Statistical models are presented for estimating the fatigue ε-N curves for austenitic SSs as a function of material, loading, and environmental parameters. Two methods for incorporating the effects of LWR coolant environments into the ASME Code fatigue evaluations are presented.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
#### In the Matter of Daniel Lugo, Appellant, v Debra Joy, as Chairperson for Temporary Release Committee, Respondent.

[831 NYS2d 712]

Appeal from judgment, Supreme Court, New *266York County (Alice Schlesinger, J.), entered June 20, 2006, dismissing this CPLR article 78 proceeding seeking to annul an administrative determination that had denied petitioner’s application to participate in the Comprehensive Alcohol and Substance Abuse Treatment (CASAT) program, unanimously dismissed as moot, without costs.

The matter is moot because petitioner has already received the relief to which he would be entitled were he to prevail *(see generally Matter of Siao-Pao v Travis,*5 AD3d 150 [2004], *lv denied*3 NY3d 603 [2004]), namely, he is currently participating in phase 1 of CASAT. Concur—Andrias, J.P., Marlow, Sullivan, Gonzalez and Kavanagh, JJ.
II 

Calendar No. 100 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 724 

[Report No. 115–81] 

To amend the Federal Power Act to modernize authorizations for necessary 

hydropower approvals. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 27, 2017 

Ms. MURKOWSKI introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

MAY 24, 2017 

Reported by Ms. MURKOWSKI, without amendment 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Power Act to modernize 

authorizations for necessary hydropower approvals. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. MODERNIZING AUTHORIZATIONS FOR NEC4 ESSARY HYDROPOWER APPROVALS. 

5 (a) PRELIMINARY PERMITS.—Section 5 of the Fed6 eral Power Act (16 U.S.C. 798) is amended— 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 724 RS

1 (1) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘three’’ and 

2 inserting ‘‘4’’; and 

3 (2) in subsection (b)— 

4 (A) by striking ‘‘Commission may extend 

5 the period of a preliminary permit once for not 

6 more than 2 additional years beyond the 3 

7 years’’ and inserting the following: ‘‘Commis8 sion may— 

9 ‘‘(1) extend the period of a preliminary permit 

10 once for not more than 4 additional years beyond 

11 the 4 years’’; 

12 (B) by striking the period at the end and 

13 inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

14 (C) by adding at the end the following: 

15 ‘‘(2) after the end of an extension period grant16 ed under paragraph (1), issue an additional permit 

17 to the permittee if the Commission determines that 

18 there are extraordinary circumstances that warrant 

19 the issuance of the additional permit.’’. 

20 (b) TIME LIMIT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF PROJECT

21 WORKS.—Section 13 of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 

22 806) is amended in the second sentence by striking ‘‘once 

23 but not longer than two additional years’’ and inserting 

24 ‘‘for not more than 8 additional years,’’. 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS

sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 100 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 724 

[Report No. 115–81] 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Power Act to modernize 

authorizations for necessary hydropower approvals. 

MAY 24, 2017 

Reported without amendment 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Donald C. Wood, the President and Chief Executive Officer of Federal Realty Investment Trust (the Company), has executed this certification in connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange
Commission of the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008 (the Report). The undersigned hereby certifies that:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|            |  |  |  |                                               
|----------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------
|May 7, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/ DONALD C. WOOD                            
|            |  |  |  | Donald C. Wood,                               
|            |  |  |  | President, Chief Executive Officer and Trustee
|            |  |  |  | (Principal Executive Officer)
<PAGE>
 
                                                                   EXHIBIT 21.0
 
                      LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY
 
  The following lists the subsidiaries of United States Filter Corporation as
of June 24, 1997, excluding those subsidiaries which, considered in the
aggregate as a single subsidiary, do not constitute a significant subsidiary.
The subsidiaries listed are all wholly owned, either directly or indirectly.
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                       STATE
                                                     (COUNTRY)
                                                         OF
     NAME                                          INCORPORATION
     ----                                          --------------
     <S>                                           <C>
     Consolidated Electric Company                 Delaware
     Darchet Industrial Water Pte. Ltd.            Singapore
     Edwards & Jones GmbH                          Germany
     Edwards & Jones, Ltd.                         United Kingdom
     Envirex Inc.                                  Delaware
     General Filter Company                        Delaware
     IP Holding Company                            Delaware
     Illinois Water Treatment, Inc.                Delaware
     RWB Beheer B.V.                               Netherlands
     Seral Erich Alhuaser GmbH & Co. KG            Germany
     Sidener Supply Company                        Missouri
     Societe des Ceramiques Techniques             France
     U.S. Filter Distribution Group, Inc.          Georgia
     U.S. Filter Wastewater Group, Inc.            Delaware
     U.S. Filter/Ionpure Inc.                      Massachusetts
     U.S. Filter/Wallace & Tiernan, Inc.           Delaware
     U.S. Filter/Zimpro, Inc.                      Delaware
     USF EOS, Inc.                                 Delaware
     USF France S.A.                               France
     USF Smogless S.p.a.                           Italy
     Wallace & Tiernan GmbH                        Germany
     Wallace & Tiernan Ltd.                        United Kingdom
     WaterPro Supplies Corporation                 Massachusetts
     Wheelabrator Clean Air Systems, Inc.          Delaware
     Wheelabrator Technologies (UK) Limited        United Kingdom
     Wheelabrator Water Technologies (T) Co. Ltd.  Taiwan
</TABLE>
 
                                      64
CERTIFICATION

            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
             (SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF
                          TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)


         Pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections
(a) and (b) of section 1350,  chapter 63 of Title 18,  United States Code),  the
undersigned  officer of NT Media  Corporation  of  California,  Inc., a Delaware
corporation  (the  "Company"),  does hereby  certify  with respect to the Annual
Report of the  Company on Form  10-KSB for the year ended  December  31, 2002 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "10-KSB Report") that:

         (1)   the 10-KSB Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) the information  contained in the 10-KSB Report fairly presents, in
all material respects,  the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated:  April 14, 2003             NT MEDIA CORPORATION OF CALIFORNIA, INC.


                                        /s/ Chris Mehringer
                                   ---------------------------------------------
                                   Chris Mehringer
                                   President, Chief Executive Officer, and Chief
                                   Financial Officer


                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.3
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Energy Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
 HDSI, LLC
EG21-2-000Wapello Solar LLC
EG21-3-000Upton County 2 Solar
EG21-5-000Harts Mill TE Holdings LLC
EG21-6-000Henrietta D Energy Storage LLC
EG21-7-000Orange County Energy Storage 2 LLC
EG21-8-000Orange County Energy Storage 3 LLC
EG21-9-000Flat Ridge 3 Wind Energy, LLC
EG21-10-000Nutmeg Solar, LLC
EG21-11-000BT Cooke Solar, LLC
EG21-12-000Rancho Seco Solar, LLC
EG21-14-000BT Kellam Solar, LLC
EG21-15-000Todd Solar LLC
EG21-16-000Groton Station Fuel Cell, LLC
EG21-17-000Sigurd Solar LLC
EG21-19-000Conrad (Hawarden) Ltd
FC21-1-000
 Take notice that during the month of December 2020, the status of the above-captioned entities as Exempt Wholesale Generators or Foreign Utility Companies became effective by operation of the Commission's regulations. 18 CFR 366.7(a) (2020). Dated: January 14, 2021. Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary.


[FR Doc. 2021-01351 Filed 1-21-21; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6717-01-P