alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 08-8049

DAVID MAURICE MAMLIN, 

 Petitioner - Appellant, 

 v. 

GENE M. JOHNSON, Director of the Virginia Department of 

Corrections, 

 Respondent - Appellee. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District 

Judge. (2:07-cv-00439-JBF-TEM) 

Submitted: June 2, 2009 Decided: June 11, 2009 

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. 

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

David Maurice Mamlin, Appellant Pro Se. Joshua Mikell Didlake, 

Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

David Maurice Mamlin seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) 

petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice 

or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). A 

prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that 

reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the 

constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or 

wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district 

court is likewise debatable. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 

U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 

(2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We 

have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Mamlin 

has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a 

certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

I, James Turek, acting Chief Financial Officer certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed the annual reports for years ended 2003 and 2004 on Form 10-KSB of Plasticon International, Inc.

2. Based on my knowledge, the report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report; 

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(c) and 15d-(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidates subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures, and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal period that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the small business issuer's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls (all of which do not apply); and

 

 

 

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal controls, (all of which do not apply).

 

Date: May 4, 2006

 

/s/ James Turek

James Turek, acting CFO
#### 1837.203-71 Release of contractors' sensitive information.

Pursuant to the clause at 1852.237-73, Release of Sensitive Information, offerors and contractors agree that NASA may release their sensitive information when requested by service providers in accordance with the procedures prescribed in 1837.203-70 and subject to the safeguards and protections delineated in the clause at 1852.237-72, Access to Sensitive Information. As required by the clause at 1852.237-73, or other contract clause or solicitation provision, contractors must identify information they claim to be “sensitive” submitted as part of a proposal or in the course of performing a contract. The contracting officer shall evaluate all contractor claims of sensitivity in deciding how NASA should respond to requests from service providers for access to information.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

BETTY BELL, AN ADULT INDIVIDUAL, AND PROPEL SCHOOLS, D/B/A PROPEL

CHARTER SCHOOL

- HOMESTEAD,

PROPEL CHARTER SCHOOL

- SUNRISE, D/B/A PROPEL BRADDOCK HILLS,

PROPEL CHARTER SCHOOL

- PITCAIRN,

AND PROPEL CHARTER SCHOOL

- HAZELWOOD,

Petitioners

v.

WILKINSBURG SCHOOL DISTRICT,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 75 WAL 2024

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the

Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 31st day of July, 2024

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

GRANTED

, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all

remaining issues

. The issue , as stated by petitioner, is:

(1) Whether, in a matter of first impression, the Commonwealth Court erred in interpreting 24 P.S. §17

- 1726

- A to permit unequal treatment of school

- aged students in the Commonwealth depending on whether the students are enrolled in a public charter school or in a traditional public school?

Justice Brobson did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.
Exhibit 32.1

BULOVA TECHNOLOGIES GROUP, INC. AND CONSOLIDATED AFFILIATE

Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C.
Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection
with the Annual Report of Bulova Technologies Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John D. Stanton, Principal Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ John D. StantonJohn D. StantonPrincipal Executive OfficerMarch 31, 2010




29
February 7, 2012 

Ms. Diana Esher (3APOO) 

Director 

Air Protection Division 

U.S. EPA Region III 

STATE OF DELAWARE 

DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES 

& ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL 

DIVISION OF AIR QUALITY 

655 S. Bay Road, Suite 5N 

DOVER,DELAWARE19901 

1650 Arch Street 

Ph.iJadel:phS A .19103-2029 

Dear Ms. 7 11er: p 1 tt ...... __.. 

RECJ="" 'C:D 

FEB 2 2. 2012 

3AP30 

Telephone: (302) 739- 9402 

Fax NO.: -(302F39-=-3-1 06--

Delawa/e has recently completed a review ofthe incineration sources within the State and 

has determined there are no new, modified or existing sewage sludge incinerator units 

subject to 40 CFR Part 60 Subpart LLLL or MMMM. 

As provided under paragraph 60.5010 of 40 CFR Part 60 Subpart MMMM, Delaware is 

submitting the above negative declaration in place of a state plan. 

In you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact Mr. Paul Foster of my 

office at (302) 323-4542. 

· Mirzakhalili, P .E. 

Division Director 

cc: Kathleen Cox, EPA Region 3 

Mike Gordon, EPA Region 3 

Paul Foster 

Jim Snead 

DAQ - Dover Office 

Printed on 

Recycled Paper
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 8 (Wednesday, January 13, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 2670]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-00695]



[[Page 2670]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

FEDERAL REGISTER CITATION NOTICE OF PREVIOUS ANNOUNCEMENT:  86 FR 1970.

PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED TIME AND DATE OF THE MEETING:  Thursday, January 
14, 2021 at 10:00 a.m. Virtual Meeting.

CHANGES IN THE MEETING:  The matter number for the following item has 
been corrected: Audit Division Recommendation Memorandum on the 
Mississippi Republican Party (A17-15).

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:  Judith Ingram, Press Officer, 
Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

    Authority:  Government in the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552b.

    Dated: January 11, 2021.
Laura E. Sinram,
Acting Secretary and Clerk of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2021-00695 Filed 1-11-21; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6715-01-P
Subject: RE: From Ted Daywalt 

From: Ted Daywalt 

Sent: 9/8/2013 11:33 PM 

To: 'Chip Cameron'; Kolotos, John; 'Rory O'sullivan'; 'Eileen Connor'; 'Whitney Barkley'; 'Margaret Reiter'; 'Tom 

Tarantino'; 'Kevin Jensen'; 'Mohr, Rhonda'; 'Warner, Jack'; 'Justice, Della (KYOAG)'; 'Libby DeBlasio'; tkriger@ ; 

'Helga Greenfield'; rhiggs@ ; 'Richard Heath'; 'Glen Gabert'; 'Nassirian, Barmak'; barbara.hoblitzell@ ; 

'Jenny Rickard'; tdalton@ ; 'Brian Jones'; 'Raymond Testa'; 'Marc Jerome'; JBerkowitz@ ; 

'Belle Whee an Private'; nharvison@ 

Cc: Macias, Wendy; Mahaffie, Lynn; 'charlie pou' 

Subject: From Ted Daywalt 

To all, 

I suspect we will be having discussions around accreditation. I thought I would share the references we give to veterans 

and their family members when they call in to VetJobs asking about a school's accreditation. Makes the decision process 

for the veteran much easier. 

These accredit the predatory for-profit schools: 

To learn more, visit <http://www.geteducated.com/diploma-mills-police/college-degree-mills/204-fakeagencies-for-co 11 ege-accredi tation>. 

These accredit the legit schools: 

To learn more about legitimate school and college accrediting agencies, please visit 

<http://www2.ed.gov/admins/finaid/accred/index.html>. 

I look forward to meeting everyone in the morning. 

Ted 

VetJobs 

P. 0 . Box 71445 

Marietta, GA 30007-1445 

o . . ( ) 

o - - X 

c - -

f - -

Veterans make the best employees! 

Freedom Is Never Free- Support Our Armed Forces and Veterans! 

Sic Vis Pacem , Para Bellum 

VetJobs is an appropriate employment service delivery system for EEOC, 

VEVRAA/JVA and OFCCP compliance support! 

Ten year recipient of WEDDLE's User's Choice Award 

Leading military employment site per AIRS, AOL, Workforce Management, Businessweek and US Chamber of Commerce 

VetJobs is a Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
         THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED  BALANCE SHEET OF BRYAN STEAM CORPORATION AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1997,
AND THE RELATED  CONDENSED  CONSOLIDATED  INCOME  STATEMENT FOR THE  THREE-MONTH
PERIOD  THEN ENDED,  AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY  BY  REFERENCE  TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                          0000014971
<NAME>                                         Bryan Steam Corporation
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-1998          
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-1-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1.000
<CASH>                                         616,983
<SECURITIES>                                   1,317,750
<RECEIVABLES>                                  5,088,899
<ALLOWANCES>                                   17,372
<INVENTORY>                                    4,309,921
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               11,716,353
<PP&E>                                         8,990,303
<DEPRECIATION>                                 3,494,094
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 17,403,186
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2,374,377
<BONDS>                                        53,459
<COMMON>                                       810,272
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   17,403,186
<SALES>                                        7,283,485
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               7,336,942
<CGS>                                          4,753,514
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1,426,953
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             1,606
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1,154,869
<INCOME-TAX>                                   483,293
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            671,576
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   671,576
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  3.51
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  3.51
        


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                       1,044,305
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   45,562
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,421,815
<PP&E>                                      26,266,330
<DEPRECIATION>                              13,062,669
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              14,837,677
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          982,184
<BONDS>                                     14,801,452
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   (945,959)<F1>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                14,837,677
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,425,755
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,908,513
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,192,261
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                324,981
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            324,981
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   324,981
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   141.10<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0

<FN>
<F1>This entity is a limited partnership. The Other Stockholders Equity line
represents total Partnership equity.
<F2>The EPS-Primary line represents net income per limited partnership unit.
</FN>

        


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Tellabs, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 28, 2007, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Krish A. Prabhu, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to and for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Krish A. Prabhu    
|Krish A. Prabhu        
|Chief Executive Officer
|Date: February 26, 2008

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will
be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                      5
<MULTIPLIER>                   1

<S>                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              APR-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                   OCT-31-1999
<CASH>                         208,699
<SECURITIES>                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                  459,166
<ALLOWANCES>                   68,900
<INVENTORY>                    2,389,705
<CURRENT-ASSETS>               3,625,397
<PP&E>                         2,788,335
<DEPRECIATION>                 1,383,061
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                 9,622,074
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>          2,207,298
<BONDS>                        2,727,657
<COMMON>                       177,799
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>          0
<PREFERRED>                    211,219
<OTHER-SE>                     4,752,755
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>   9,622,074
<SALES>                        2,652,099
<TOTAL-REVENUES>               2,652,099
<CGS>                          1,974,366
<TOTAL-COSTS>                  2,652,099
<OTHER-EXPENSES>               (91,900)
<LOSS-PROVISION>               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>             68,518
<INCOME-PRETAX>                9,643
<INCOME-TAX>                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>            9,643
<DISCONTINUED>                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                0
<CHANGES>                      0
<NET-INCOME>                   9,643
<EPS-BASIC>                  .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                  .01


</TABLE>
Legend

Panhandle and Hawthorne

Panhandle East

Panhandle West

Legend

Hawthorne Formation

Panhandle East

Panhandle West
# June 2020 FOIA Log
No. 716.

#### E. J. Frazier *v.*State of Oregon.

March 22, 1920.

*Mr. Enos S. Stock-bridge*for petitioner.

*Mr. George M. Brown*for respondent.

Petition for a writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of the State of Oregon denied.
#### ISAACSON v. WOLFENSOHN.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.

November 6, 1903.)

1. Landlord and Tenant—Surrender—Presumption as to Acceptance— Reletting.

The acceptance of a surrender is a matter of defense to an action for rent; and where the tenant fails to show the time and period of a reletting by the landlord during the term, it will not be presumed to have been made at such time as to constitute an acceptance.

3. Same—Credit in Rent.

Money received by a landlord on a reletting of the premises during the term to a third person must, in an action for rent, be credited to the tenant.

Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Fourth District.

Action for rent by Isaac Isaacson against Nathan Wolfensohn. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals. Modified.

Argued before FREEDMAN, P. J., and BISCHOFF and BEAN-CHARD, JJ.

Charles Dushlcind, for appellant.

Jacob S. Strahl, for respondent.

BISCHOFF, J.

The evidence does not show an acceptance of the tenant’s surrender of the premises, and the justice was authorized to find the facts as to the terms of the lease and the tenant’s default in the plaintiff’s favor. It appears, however, from the plaintiff’s testimony, that he relet the premises for some time during the term, and received $9. We are not to assume that this reletting was at the beginning of the term for which rent was claimed in this action, and thus hold the plaintiff to an election to accept the defendant’s surrender, for this was matter of defense, and the defendant failed to show the time and period of the reletting; but, if there was no surrender and acceptance, the reletting during the term was at least for the tenant’s account, one or the other contingency being necessarily involved. See Gray v. Kaufman Co., 162 N. Y. 388, 56 N. E. 903, 49 L. R. A. 580, 76 Am. St. Rep. 327. , We may assume (the defendant not having proven the date) that the reletting was at the end of the term, but, the fact of reletting being admitted, the justice should have credited the amount which the plaintiff thus received.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event, unless respondent stipulate to reduce the damages to $31, in which event the judgment will be affirmed, without costs. All concur.