26718 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 91 / Friday, May 11, 2007 / Rules and Regulations 

Affected ADs 

(b) None. 

Applicability 

(c) This AD applies to Model 750XL 

airplanes, serial numbers 125, 126, and 127, 

certificated in any category. 

Subject 

(d) Air Transport Association of America 

(ATA) Code 22: Autopilot. 

Reason 

(e) The mandatory continuing 

airworthiness information (MCAI) states: 

* * * failure of the Autopilot System 

Computer resulting in the possibility of an 

out of trim condition, which may lead to loss 

of aircraft control* * * 

Actions and Compliance 

(f) Unless already done, do the following 

actions before further flight. 

(1) Modify the autopilot pitch trim circuit 

with additional protective features following 

Pacific Aerospace Limited Mandatory Service 

Bulletin PACSB/XL/025, dated March 5, 

2007. 

(2) Inspect the Pitch Servo to confirm part 

number (P/N) 108–15–P1 is installed 

following Pacific Aerospace Limited 

Mandatory Service Bulletin PACSB/XL/025, 

dated March 5, 2007. 

(i) If Pitch Servo P/N 108–15–P1 is 

installed, no further action is necessary. 

(ii) If Pitch Servo P/N 108–15–P1 is not 

installed, replace the Pitch Servo with P/N 

108–15–P1 following Pacific Aerospace 

Limited Mandatory Service Bulletin PACSB/ 

XL/025, dated March 5, 2007. 

FAA AD Differences 

Note: This AD differs from the MCAI and/ 

or service information as follows: 

(1) The MCAI requires an interim action of 

disconnecting the autopilot following Pacific 

Aerospace Limited Alert Service Bulletin 

PACSB/XL/001, dated February 16, 2007. 

Since there are no products of this type 

currently registered in the United States, and 

Pacific Aerospace Limited Mandatory Service 

Bulletin PACSB/XL/025, dated March 5, 

2007, supersedes Pacific Aerospace Limited 

Alert Service Bulletin PACSB/XL/001, dated 

February 16, 2007, we are not requiring 

disconnection of the autopilot. Instead we 

require the autopilot comply with the 

terminating actions in Pacific Aerospace 

Limited Mandatory Service Bulletin PACSB/ 

XL/025, dated March 5, 2007. 

(2) The MCAI allows modification of the 

pitch trim circuit within 150 hours time-inservice. Since there are no products of this 

type currently registered in the United States, 

we are requiring modification of the pitch 

trim circuit before a domestic airworthiness 

certificate can be issued. 

Other FAA AD Provisions 

(g) The following provisions also apply to 

this AD: 

(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance 

(AMOCs): The Manager, Small Airplane 

Directorate, FAA, has the authority to 

approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested 

using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. 

Send information to ATTN: Karl 

Schletzbaum, Aerospace Engineer, 901 

Locust, Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri 

64106; telephone: (816) 329–4146; fax: (816) 

329–4090. Before using any approved AMOC 

on any airplane to which the AMOC applies, 

notify your appropriate principal inspector 

(PI) in the FAA Flight Standards District 

Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local 

FSDO. 

(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement 

in this AD to obtain corrective actions from 

a manufacturer or other source, use these 

actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective 

actions are considered FAA-approved if they 

are approved by the State of Design Authority 

(or their delegated agent). You are required 

to assure the product is airworthy before it 

is returned to service. 

(3) Reporting Requirements: For any 

reporting requirement in this AD, under the 

provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act 

(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) has 

approved the information collection 

requirements and has assigned OMB Control 

Number 2120–0056. 

Related Information 

(h) Refer to MCAI Civil Aviation Authority 

of New Zealand AD DCA/750XL/12A, 

drafted: March 27, 2007, effective date: 

March 29, 2007; and Pacific Aerospace 

Limited Mandatory Service Bulletin PACSB/ 

XL/025, dated March 5, 2007, for related 

information. 

Material Incorporated by Reference 

(i) You must use Pacific Aerospace Limited 

Mandatory Service Bulletin PACSB/XL/025, 

dated March 5, 2007, to do the actions 

required by this AD, unless the AD specifies 

otherwise. 

(1) The Director of the Federal Register 

approved the incorporation by reference of 

this service information under 5 U.S.C. 

552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. 

(2) For service information identified in 

this AD, contact Pacific Aerospace Limited, 

Hamilton Airport, Private Bag HN3027, 

Hamilton, New Zealand; telephone: (64) 7–

843–6144; fax: (64) 7–843–6134. 

(3) You may review copies at the FAA, 

Central Region, Office of the Regional 

Counsel, 901 Locust, Room 506, Kansas City, 

Missouri 64106; or at the National Archives 

and Records Administration (NARA). For 

information on the availability of this 

material at NARA, call 202–741–6030, or go 

to: http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/ 

code_of_federal_regulations/ 

ibr_locations.html. 

Issued in Kansas City, Missouri on May 4, 

2007. 

Charles L. Smalley, 

Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, 

Aircraft Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. E7–8993 Filed 5–10–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Parts 52 and 81 

[EPA–R09–OAR–2007–0101; FRL–8308–4] 

Approval and Promulgation of 

Implementation Plans and Designation 

of Areas for Air Quality Planning 

Purposes: California 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: EPA is granting a request 

submitted by the State to redesignate the 

South Coast from nonattainment to 

attainment for the CO National Ambient 

Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). EPA is 

also approving a state implementation 

plan (SIP) revision for the South Coast 

nonattainment area in California as 

meeting the Clean Air Act (CAA) 

requirements for maintenance plans for 

carbon monoxide (CO). EPA is finding 

adequate and approving motor vehicle 

emission budgets, which are included in 

the maintenance plan. Finally, EPA is 

approving the California motor vehicle 

inspection and maintenance 

(I/M) program as meeting the low 

enhanced I/M requirements for CO in 

the South Coast. 

DATES: Effective Date: This rule is 

effective on June 11, 2007. 

ADDRESSES: Copies of the documents 

relevant to this action are available for 

public inspection during normal 

business hours at EPA Region 9’s Air 

Planning Office (AIR–2), 75 Hawthorne 

Street, San Francisco, CA 94105–3901. 

Due to increased security, we suggest 

that you call at least 24 hours prior to 

visiting the Regional Office so that we 

can make arrangements to have 

someone meet you. 

Electronic Availability 

This document and our proposed 

rule, which was published on February 

14, 2007, are also available at 

www.regulations.gov for docket number 

EPA–R09–OAR–2007–0101. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

David Jesson, U.S. EPA Region 9, 415–

972–3961, david.jesson@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Throughout this document, the terms 

‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ and ‘‘our’’ mean U.S. EPA. 

Table of Contents 

I. Proposed Action 

II. Public Comments 

III. Final Action 

IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 91 / Friday, May 11, 2007 / Rules and Regulations 26719 

1A letter from CARB dated August 11, 2006, 

contained information related to the enhanced I/M 

program, but we are not incorporating this letter in 

the approved SIP. 

I. Proposed Action 

On February 14, 2007 (72 FR 6986), 

we proposed to approve the 2005 

Carbon Monoxide Redesignation 

Request and Carbon Monoxide 

Maintenance Plan for the South Coast 

Air Basin (Maintenance Plan) as 

meeting the requirements of CAA 

sections 107(d)(3)(E) and 175A. We also 

proposed to approve and find adequate 

the motor vehicle emissions budgets 

(MVEBs) submitted with the 

Maintenance Plan. 

We proposed to approve the request 

by the State of California to redesignate 

the area to attainment for CO under the 

provisions of CAA section 107(d)(3)(E). 

Section 107(d)(3)(E) authorizes the EPA 

Administrator to redesignate areas to 

attainment if the area has attained the 

NAAQS due to permanent and 

enforceable emission reductions, and 

the approved SIP for the area meets all 

of the applicable requirements of CAA 

section 110 (basic requirements 

applicable to SIPs generally), Part D 

(special SIP requirements applicable to 

nonattainment areas), and 175A (SIP 

requirements for maintenance areas). 

As part of our proposed determination 

that California has met applicable Part 

D provisions, we proposed to adapt to 

CO nonattainment areas the provisions 

of our Clean Data Policy, which was 

initially established for ozone (see 

discussion at 72 FR 6989). Under the 

Clean Data Policy, certain CAA Part D 

requirements—including the 

requirements for developing attainment 

demonstrations, reasonable further 

progress (RFP) plans, reasonably 

available control measures (RACM) and 

contingency measures—no longer apply 

because the area has already attained 

the NAAQS. 

Finally, because our interim approval 

of California’s I/M program for CO in 

the South Coast expired on August 7, 

1998, California submitted a 

demonstration that the I/M program 

meets the low-enhanced requirements 

applicable to the South Coast CO 

nonattainment area (see discussion in 

section III.B.4. We proposed to approve 

that demonstration. 

II. Public Comments 

Our February 14, 2007 proposed rule 

provided a 30-day public comment 

period, which closed on March 16, 

2007. We received no comments on our 

proposal during this period. 

III. Final Action 

We are taking final action to 

redesignate the South Coast from 

nonattainment to attainment for the CO 

National Ambient Air Quality Standards 

(NAAQS) under CAA section 

107(d)(3)(E). 

We are approving the following SIP 

revision as meeting the Clean Air Act 

(CAA) requirements for maintenance 

plans for carbon monoxide (CO) under 

CAA section 175A: 2005 Carbon 

Monoxide Redesignation Request and 

Carbon Monoxide Maintenance Plan for 

the South Coast Air Basin, adopted by 

the SCAQMD on March 4, 2005, and 

adopted and submitted by the CARB on 

February 24, 2006.1

We are approving Appendix V, page 

V–5–4, Table 5–2—‘‘Carbon Monoxide 

Emissions (tons/day) Projected from 

1993 through 2000 for the South Coast 

Air Basin,’’ in the 1997 CO Plan for the 

South Coast, adopted by SCAQMD on 

November 15, 1996, and adopted and 

submitted by CARB on February 5, 

1997, as meeting the requirements of 

CAA section 187(b)(2) relating to 

transportation control measures to offset 

emissions associated with growth in 

vehicle miles traveled and vehicle trips. 

We are finding adequate and 

approving under CAA section 176(c) the 

following motor vehicle emission 

budgets included in the maintenance 

plan: 2888 tons per day of CO for 2005, 

and 2137 tons per day of CO for 2010, 

2015, and 2020. 

We are approving the State’s 

demonstration that the California motor 

vehicle inspection and maintenance 

(I/M) program meets the low enhanced 

I/M requirements for CO in the South 

Coast under CAA section 187(a)(6). The 

State’s I/M program submittal of January 

22, 1996, remains an approved part of 

the SIP, following its approval on 

January 8, 1997 (62 FR 1150). 

IV. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews 

Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 

51735, October 4, 1993), this action is 

not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ and 

therefore is not subject to review by the 

Office of Management and Budget. For 

this reason, this action is also not 

subject to Executive Order 13211, 

(Actions Concerning Regulations That 

Significantly Affect Energy Supply, 

Distribution, or Use’’ (66 FR 28355, May 

22, 2001). This action merely approves 

changes to state law as meeting Federal 

requirements, and imposes no 

additional requirements beyond those 

imposed by state law. Accordingly, the 

Administrator certifies that this rule 

will not have a significant economic 

impact on a substantial number of small 

entities under the Regulatory Flexibility 

Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because this 

rule approves pre-existing requirements 

under state law and does not impose 

any additional enforceable duty beyond 

that required by state law, it does not 

contain any unfunded mandate or 

significantly or uniquely affect small 

governments, as described in the 

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 

(Pub. L. 104–4). 

This rule also does not have tribal 

implications because it will not have a 

substantial direct effect on one or more 

Indian tribes, on the relationship 

between the Federal Government and 

Indian tribes, or on the distribution of 

power and responsibilities between the 

Federal Government and Indian tribes, 

as specified by Executive Order 13175 

(65 FR 97249, November 9, 2000), nor 

will it have substantial direct effects on 

the States, on the relationship between 

the national government and the States, 

or on the distribution of power and 

responsibilities among the various 

levels of government, as specified in 

Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, 

August 10, 1999), because it merely 

approves a State rule implementing a 

Federal standard, and does not alter the 

relationship or the distribution of power 

and responsibilities established in the 

CAA. This rule also is not subject to 

Executive Order 13045 ‘‘Protection of 

Children from Environmental Health 

Risks and Safety Risks’’ (62 FR 19885, 

April 23, 1997), because it approves a 

state plan implementing a Federal 

Standard. 

In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA’s 

role is to approve state choices, 

provided that they meet the criteria of 

the Clean Air Act. In this context, in the 

absence of a prior existing requirement 

for the state to use voluntary consensus 

standards (VCS), EPA has no authority 

to disapprove a SIP submission for 

failure to use VCS. It would thus be 

inconsistent with applicable law for 

EPA, when it reviews a SIP, to use VCS 

in place of a SIP submission that 

otherwise satisfies the provisions of the 

Clean Air Act. Thus, the requirements of 

section 12(d) of the National 

Technology Transfer and Advancement 

Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not 

apply. 

The Congressional Review Act, 5 

U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small 

Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides 

that before a rule may take effect, the 

agency promulgating the rule must 

submit a rule report, which includes a 

copy of the rule, to each House of the 

Congress and to the Comptroller General 

of the United States. EPA will submit a 

report containing this rule and other 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with RULES
26720 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 91 / Friday, May 11, 2007 / Rules and Regulations 

required information to the U.S. Senate, 

the U.S. House of Representatives, and 

the Comptroller General of the United 

States prior to publication of the rule in 

the Federal Register. A major rule 

cannot take effect until 60 days after it 

is published in the Federal Register. 

This action is not a major rule as 

defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). 

Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean 

Air Act, petitions for judicial review of 

this action must be filed in the United 

States Court of Appeals for the 

appropriate circuit by July 10, 2007. 

Filing a petition for reconsideration by 

the Administrator of this final rule does 

not affect the finality of this rule for the 

purposes of judicial review nor does it 

extend the time within which a petition 

for judicial review may be filed, and 

shall not postpone the effectiveness of 

such rule or action. This action may not 

be challenged later in proceedings to 

enforce its requirements. (See section 

307(b)(2).) 

List of Subjects 

40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Carbon monoxide, 

Intergovernmental relations, Reporting 

and recordkeeping requirements. 

40 CFR Part 81 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, National parks, 

Wilderness areas. 

Dated: April 24, 2007. 

Wayne Nastri, 

Regional Administrator, Region 9. 

■ 40 CFR parts 52 and 81 are amended 

as follows: 

PART 52—[AMENDED] 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 52 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Subpart F—California 

■ 2. Section 52.220 is amended by 

adding subparagraph (c)(247)(i)(A)(6) 

and adding paragraph (c)(346) to read as 

follows: 

§ 52.220 Identification of plan. 

* * * * * 

(c) * * * 

(247) * * * 

(i) * * * 

(A) * * * 

(6) Appendix V, page V–5–4, Table 5–

2—‘‘Carbon Monoxide Emissions (tons/ 

day) Projected from 1993 through 2000 

for the South Coast Air Basin.’’

* * * * * 

(346) New and amended plans for the 

following AQMD were submitted on 

February 24, 2006, by the Governor’s 

designee. 

(i) Incorporation by reference. 

(A) South Coast Air Quality 

Management District (SCAQMD). 

(1) 2005 Carbon Monoxide 

Redesignation Request and Maintenance 

Plan for the South Coast Air Basin, as 

adopted by SCAQMD on March 4, 2005, 

and by California Air Resources Board 

on February 24, 2006. 

PART 81—[AMENDED] 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 81 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Subpart C—[Amended] 

■ 2. In § 81.305, the table ‘‘California—

Carbon Monoxide’’ is amended by 

revising the entry for ‘‘Los AngelesSouth Coast Air Basin Area’’ to read as 

follows: 

§ 81.305 California. 

* * * * * 

CALIFORNIA—CARBON MONOXIDE

Designated area 

Designation Classification 

Date 1 Type Date Type 

* * * * * * * 

Los Angeles-South Coast Air Basin Area ............................... 6/11/07 Attainment.

Los Angeles County (part)—that portion of Los Angeles 

County which lies south and west of a line described as 

follows: 

1. Beginning at the Los Angeles-San Bernardino County 

boundary and running west along the township line 

common to Township 3 North and Township 2 North, 

San Bernardino Base and Meridian; 

2. Then north along the range line common to Range 8 

West and Range 9 West; 

3. Then west along the township line common to Township 4 North and Township 3 North; 

4. Then north along the range line common to Range 

12 West and Range 13 West to the southeast corner 

of Section 12, Township 5 North and Range 13 West; 

5. Then west along the south boundaries of Sections 

12, 11, 10, 9, 8, and 7, Township 5 North and Range 

13 West to the boundary of the Angeles National Forest which is collinear with the range line common to 

Range 13 West and Range 14 West; 

6. Then north and west along the Angeles National Forest boundary to the point of intersection with the 

township line common to Township 7 North and 

Township 6 North (point is at the northwest corner of 

Section 4 in Township 6 North and Range 14 West); 

7. Tthen west along the township line common to Township 7 North and Township 6 North; 

8. Then north along the range line common to Range 

15 West and Range 16 West to the southeast corner 

of Section 13, Township 7 North and Range 16 West; 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 91 / Friday, May 11, 2007 / Rules and Regulations 26721 

CALIFORNIA—CARBON MONOXIDE—Continued 

Designated area 

Designation Classification 

Date 1 Type Date Type 

9. Then along the south boundaries of Sections 13, 14, 

15, 16, 17, and 18, Township 7 North and Range 16 

West; 

10. Then north along the range line common to Range 

16 West and Range 17 West to the north boundary of 

the Angeles National Forest (collinear with the township line common to Township 8 North and Township 

7 North); 

11. Then west along the Angeles National Forest 

boundary to the point of intersection with the south 

boundary of the Rancho La Liebre Land Grant; 

12. Then west and north along this land grant boundary 

to the Los Angeles-Kern County boundary. 

Orange County: 

Riverside County (part)—that portion of Riverside County 

which lies to the west of a line described as follows: 

1. Beginning at the Riverside—San Diego County 

boundary and running north along the range line common to Range 4 East and Range 3 East, San 

Bernardino Base and Meridian; 

2. Then east along the township line common to Township 8 South and Township 7 South; 

3. Then north along the range line common to Range 5 

East and Range 4 East; 

4. Then west along the township line common to Township 6 South and Township 7 South to the southwest 

corner of Section 34, Township 6 South, Range 4 

East; 

5. Then north along the west boundaries of Sections 34, 

27, 22, 15, 10, and 3, Township 6 South, Range 4 

East; 

6. Then west along the township line common to Township 5 South and Township 6 South; 

7. Then north along the range line common to Range 4 

East and Range 3 East; 

8. Then west along the south boundaries of Sections 

13, 14, 15, 16, 17, and 18, Township 5 South, Range 

3 East; 

9. Then north along the range line common to Range 2 

East and Range 3 East to the Riverside-San 

Bernardino county line. 

San Bernardino County—that portion of San Bernardino 

County which lies south and west of a line described as 

follows: 

1. Beginning at the San Bernardino-Riverside County 

boundary and running north along the range line common to Range 3 East and Range 2 East, San 

Bernardino Base and Meridian; 

2. Then west along the township line common to Township 3 North and Township 2 North to the San 

Bernardino—Los Angeles County boundary. 

* * * * * * * 

1This date is November 15, 1990, unless otherwise noted. 

[FR Doc. E7–8673 Filed 5–10–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with RULES