Name:

Title:

Company:

Sign Date:

Name:

Title:

Company:

Sign Date:

Permitted Facility Representative / Date Testing Company Representative / Date

Final Test Report 

for

/ /

Based on information and belief formed 

after reasonable inquiry, I certify that the 

statements and information in this test 

report are true, accurate, and complete.

I have reviewed all testing details and 

results in this test report and hereby 

certify that the test report is authentic 

and accurate.

Monday, February 07, 2011 Page 1 of 7
Facility Information:

Georgia Power Plant Yates

708 Dyer Rd

Newnan Ga 30263

Contact: Sarah Markham

Phone: 205-257-6780

Fax:

Email: sasander@southernco.com

Testing Company:

Weston Solutions

1625 Pumphrey Ave

Auburn Al 36832

Contact:Jon Howard

Phone: 334-466-5600

Fax: 334-466-5660

Email: j.howard@westonsolutions.com

Air Permit Number: Permitted Source ID/Name:

Y1BR Unit 1

Permitted Maximum Process Rate: Max. Normal Operation Process Rate: Target Process Test Rat

Description of the source (including control equipment). Please see the attachments for source or

 process flow diagram:

See Attached Report

The following describes any modifications and/or deviations to the applicable test 

methods. If alternative methods were requested, see the attachments for documentation 

of request AND approval, including dates.

-CTM-033 - Reference method requires a matrix spike, but this was not performed.

Industry/SCC/NAIS

Sampling Location Information:

Test Parameter Information:

AFS #: FRS #:

SCC / Description

The following state and federal regulations that apply to the proposed testing:

Location

Round

Duct

Diam.

Distance from 

upstream dist.

Distance from

downstream dist.

Number of

Traverse Ports

Equiv. 

Diam

Min.Travers 

Points

Rect. Duct 

Length /Width

Stack 150 0 0 0 1000 500 2 16

Target

Parameter 

Test

Method

Number of

Test Runs

Test Run

Duration

Sample 

Location Points Comments

Stack Hydrogen Fluoride Method 26A 3 0

Stack Hydrogen Chloride Method 26A 3 0

Monday, February 07, 2011 Page 2 of 7
-M26A/CTM-033 sample train was modified using 6N caustic in the caustic impinger, in order to keep final sample 

pH > 12, method requirement. The sample volumes are corrected for the CO2 concentration; due to the use of the 

strong caustic CO2 is removed from the gas stream. 

- Please also note that the values presented in this database and the values in the hard copy report will vary slightly. 

We expect these differences are due to the fact that the ERT database recalculates all values. 

-Testing was conducted prior to the EPA FAQs page being updated, therefore, the reduced sample time and 

increased caustic strength and volume significantly raised the method detection limit for the CTM-033 component.

Monday, February 07, 2011 Page 3 of 7
Monday, February 07, 2011 Page 4 of 7
Sampling / Stack Data Results Summary

Location Stack - Method 26A

Average

Run Number 1 2 3

Test Date 4/20/2010 4/20/2010 4/20/2010

Run Start Time 10:10:00 AM 11:40:00 

AM

1:03:00 PM

Run Finish Time 11:23:00 AM 12:55:00 

PM

2:13:00 PM

Net Run Time, minutes 64 64 64

Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 36.435 36.913 35.871 36.406

Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 21.77 19.90 18.40 20.023

Moisture Saturation at Stack Gas Temperature, % 11.07 11.24 11.20 11.170

Carbon Dioxide, % 10.8 10.7 10.6 10.700

Oxygen, % 8.9 8.4 9.4 8.900

Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 117.50 118.06 117.93 117.830

Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 276,902.3 279,403.2 275,249.6 277,185.033

Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 351,366.2 355,563.1 350,040.8 352,323.367

Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 104.9 105.3 103.9 104.700

F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 9780 9780 9780 9,780.000

Fw 10640 10640 10640 10,640.000

Fc 1800 1800 1800 1,800.000

Monday, February 07, 2011 Page 5 of 7
Emissions Summary

Process Run Data

Location: Stack - Method 26A

Compound: Hydrogen Chloride

Average

RunNumber 1 2 3

Mass_mg 0.197 0.161 0.118 0.159

lb/mmBtuO2 2.03E-04 1.57E-04 1.29E-04 0.000

ppm 1.26E-01 1.02E-01 7.66E-02 0.102

ppm@7%O2 1.46E-01 1.13E-01 9.26E-02 0.117

Compound: Hydrogen Fluoride

Average

RunNumber 1 2 3

Mass_mg 0.16 0.126 0.087 0.124

lb/mmBtuO2 1.65E-04 1.23E-04 9.50E-05 0.000

ppm 1.86E-01 1.45E-01 1.03E-01 0.145

ppm@7%O2 2.15E-01 1.61E-01 1.24E-01 0.167

Monday, February 07, 2011 Page 6 of 7
Process Run Data

APCD Run Data

Process Lab Run Data

Run Name Value UOM Comments

Target

Value

1 Gross Electric Output 106.60 MW 0

2 Gross Electric Output 106.87 MW 0

3 Gross Electric Output 106.94 MW 0

Run Name Value UOM Comments

1 Coal Fuel Analysis 12459 Btu/lb

2 Coal Fuel Analysis 12444 Btu/lb

3 Coal Fuel Analysis 12397 Btu/lb

Monday, February 07, 2011 Page 7 of 7
Sampling / Stack Data Results Detail

Location Stack - Method 26A

Average

Run Number 1 2 3

Test Date 4/20/2010 4/20/2010 4/20/2010

Run Start Time 10:10:00 AM 11:40:00 AM 1:03:00 PM

Run Finish Time 11:23:00 AM 12:55:00 PM 2:13:00 PM

Net Traversing Points 16 16 15

Net Run Time, minutes 64 64 64

Nozzle Diameter, inches 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.210

Pitot Tube Coefficient 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.840

Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor 0.996 0.996 0.996 0.996

Barometric Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.02 29.02 29.02 29.020

Average Orifice Meter Differential, inches H2O 1.16 1.17 1.13 1.153

Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, cubic feet 37.552 37.917 37.138 37.536

Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F 67.25 65.50 69.60 67.450

Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 36.435 36.913 35.871 36.406

Total Moisture Liquid collected, g 215.5 194.8 171.9 194.067

Volume of Water Vapor, standard cubic feet 10.14 9.17 8.09 9.133

Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 21.77 19.90 18.40 20.023

Moisture Saturation at Stack Gas Temperature, % 11.07 11.24 11.20 11.170

Dry Mole Fraction 0.8893 0.8876 0.888 0.888

Carbon Dioxide, % 10.8 10.7 10.6 10.700

Oxygen, % 8.9 8.4 9.4 8.900

Carbon Monoxide & Nitrogen, % 80.3 80.9 80 80.400

Fuel Factor 1.11 1.17 1.08

Dry Molecular Weight, lb/lb-Mole 30.08 30.05 30.07 30.067

Wet Molecular weight, lb/lb-Mole 30.67 30.25 30.01 30.310

Flue Gas Static Pressure, inches of H2O -0.25 -0.25 -0.25 -0.250

Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.00 29.00 29.00 29.000

Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 117.50 118.06 117.93 117.830

Average Velocity Head, inches of H2O 0.6800092436

0766

0.686188479

262482

0.659971618

104892

0.675

Average Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second 47.72 48.29 47.54 47.850

Stack Cross-Sectional Area, square feet 122.718 122.718 122.718 122.718

Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 276,902.3 279,403.2 275,249.6 277,185.033

Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 351,366.2 355,563.1 350,040.8 352,323.367

Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 104.9 105.3 103.9 104.700

Percent Excess Air, % 72.4 64.8 80.2 72.467

F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 9780 9780 9780 9,780.000

Round Duct Diameter, inches 150 150 150

Rectangular Duct Width, inches 0 0 0

Rectangular Duct Length, inches 0 0 0

Fw 10640 10640 10640 10,640.000

Fc 1800 1800 1800 1,800.000

Monday, February 07, 2011 Page 8 of 7