alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### 1852.245-75 Property management changes.

As prescribed in 1845.107-70(f), insert the following clause.

# Property Management Changes (JAN 2011)

(a) The Contractor shall submit any changes to standards and practices used for management and control of Government property under this contract to the assigned property administrator prior to making the change whenever the change—

(1) Employs a standard that allows increase in thresholds or changes the timing for reporting loss, damage, or destruction of property;

(2) Alters physical inventory timing or procedures;

(3) Alters recordkeeping practices;

(4) Alters practices for recording the transport or delivery of Government property; or

(5) Alters practices for disposition of Government property.

(End of clause)

[76 FR 2006, Jan. 12, 2011]
Draft for discussion purposes 11.8.13

Metrics Annual debt-to-earnings Discretionary debt-to-earnings Program cohort default rate Loa

Students Completers only Completers & non-completers Complete

Categories & thresholds

Pass: aDTE≤8% OR dDTE≤20%

Zone:• Not passing AND• 8%<aDTE≤12% OR 20%<dDTE≤30%Fail: aDTE>12% AND dDTE>30%

Pass: pCDR<30%Fail: 30%≤pCDR≤40%

Ineligible: pCDR>40%

Pass: Totprogram’

interest pFail: Totaprogram’interest p

Ineligibility rules(metrics operate independently of each other, outcome on one metric does not impact outcomes on others)

A program becomes T4 ineligible for 3yrs if:• It fails in any 2 out of 3yrs, OR• Does not pass in any 1 out of 4yrs 

(time for zone programs to improve before ineligibility)

A program becomes T4 ineligible for 3yrs if:• The 3 year default rate of 3 

consecutive cohorts of students is greater than 30%, OR

• The 3 year default rate of 1 cohort 

of students is greater than 40%

A program for 3yrs if out of 3 y

Restrictions • Debt warnings to students if 

program could become ineligible at the end of the year (applies to zone & failing programs)

• T4 enrollment limited to previous 

year’s level for failing programs (does not apply to zone programs)

• Debt warnings to students if 

program could become ineligible at the end of the year

• T4 enrollment limited to previous 

year’s level if program could become ineligible at the end of the year

• Debt w

prograat the 

• T4 enr

previocould end of 

Overview of Draft Gainful Employment Regulation 

Negotiated Rulemaking Session 2
Existing program 

certification

For existing programs, institution must sign certification that program is included in inor has received programmatic accreditation if required and that completion of program to become employed in the occupation for which the program provides training

New program approval

New programs apply only if the program was deemed ineligible, was a failing or zone pvoluntarily closed, is in the same “family of CIP” codes as a current or recent failing p

program within a new category of CIP codes

Student protections

If program could become ineligible at the end of the year, institution must post letter oaside portion of T4 funds to provide borrower relief to enrolled students if program eveineligible

Disclosures

• Occupation• Cost of tuition, fees, books, supplies• Program length• Total enrollment• Completion rate (100 & 150% of program time)• Withdrawal rate (within normal time of program)• Placement rate

• Repayment rate (borrower-• Median earnings• Median loan debt• Whether licensure requirem

applicable)

• Whether program is accred

Overview of Draft Gainful Employment Regulation 

Negotiated Rulemaking Session 2, cont.

Draft for discussion purposes 11.8.13
#### 1852.242-73 NASA contractor financial management reporting.

As prescribed in 1842.7202, insert the following clause:

# NASA Contractor Financial Management Reporting (NOV 2004)

(a) The Contractor shall submit NASA Contractor Financial Management Reports on NASA Forms 533 in accordance with the instructions in NASA Procedures and Guidelines (NPR) 9501.2, NASA Contractor Financial Management Reporting, and on the reverse side of the forms, as supplemented in the Schedule of this contract. The detailed reporting categories to be used, which shall correlate with technical and schedule reporting, shall be set forth in the Schedule. Contractor implementation of reporting requirements under this clause shall include NASA approval of the definitions of the content of each reporting category and give due regard to the Contractor's established financial management information system.

(b) Lower level detail used by the Contractor for its own management purposes to validate information provided to NASA shall be compatible with NASA requirements.

(c) Reports shall be submitted in the number of copies, at the time, and in the manner set forth in the Schedule or as designated in writing by the Contractor Officer. Upon completion and acceptance by NASA of all contract line items, the Contracting Officer may direct the Contractor to submit Form 533 reports on a quarterly basis only, report only when changes in actual cost incur, or suspend reporting altogether.

(d) The Contractor shall ensure that its Form 533 reports include accurate subcontractor cost data, in the proper reporting categories, for the reporting period.

(e) If during the performance of this contract NASA requires a change in the information or reporting requirements specified in the Schedule, or as provided for in paragraph (a) or (c) of this clause, the Contracting Officer shall effect that change in accordance with the Changes clause of this contract.

(End of clause)

[62 FR 36735, July 9, 1997; 62 FR 40309, July 28, 1997, as amended at 65 FR 46628, July 31, 2000; 69 FR 63460, Nov. 2, 2004]
In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06-12-00133-CR

JAMES NATHAN ALEXANDER, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 188th District Court

Gregg County, Texas

Trial Court No. 40028-A

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.
2

O R D E R

Court reporter Grelyn Freeman has filed a third request for extension of time to prepare 

the reporter’s record in cause number 06-12-00133-CR, styled James Nathan Alexander v. The 

State of Texas, appealed from the 188th Judicial District Court of Gregg County, Texas. The 

reporter’s record was originally due in this case on or before December 4, 2012. It is currently 

due, on Freeman’s second request for extension, February 4, 2013.

The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure instruct:

The trial and appellate courts are jointly responsible for ensuring that the appellate 

record is timely filed. The appellate court may extend the deadline to file the 

record if requested by the clerk or reporter. Each extension must not exceed 30 

days in an ordinary or restricted appeal, or 10 days in an accelerated appeal. The 

appellate court must allow the record to be filed late when the delay is not the 

appellant’s fault, and may do so when the delay is the appellant’s fault. The 

appellate court may enter any order necessary to ensure the timely filing of the 

appellate record.

TEX. R. APP. P. 35.3(c).

In furtherance of our responsibilities, we find we must take steps to ensure the timely 

filing of this appellate record. 

We overrule Freeman’s third request for an extension of time.

Further, we order that Freeman complete and file the reporter’s record in this matter on or 

before March 21, 2013. 

If the record is not received by March 21, we warn Freeman that we may begin contempt 

proceedings requiring her to show cause why she should not be held in contempt of this Court 

for failing to obey its order.
3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

BY THE COURT

Date: February 20, 2013
#### 1433.213 Obligation to continue performance.

If the CO considers financing continued contractor performance to be in the best interest of the Government, the CO shall prepare and forward a determination to the HCA for approval.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
PARTNERSHIP'S STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS AND BALANCE SHEETS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                      10,575,810
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            10,575,810
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,960,231
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          110,192
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,925,762
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,960,231
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,806,188
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               770,391
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             151,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                884,797
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            884,797
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   884,797
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Jerry Lee Martin, * From the 104th District

 Court of Taylor County,

 Trial Court No. 18553B.

Vs. No. 11-12-00362-CR * February 7, 2013

State of Texas, * Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

 (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

 McCall, J., and Willson, J.)

 This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that the appeal should be 

dismissed. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, the appeal is dismissed.
### IN THE UNI TED STAT ES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCU IT

N o
. 1 0

- 1 0 0 4 8 C o n f e r e n c e C a l e n d a r

U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A , P l a i n t i f f

- A p p e l l e e

v
. T I M O T H Y G E U R I N , D e f e n d a n t

- A p p e l l a n t

A p p e a l f

r o m t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s D i s t r i c t C o u r t f o r t h e N o r t h e r n D i s t r i c t o f T e x a s U S D C N o
. 4 : 0 9

- C R

- 9 5

- 1

B e f o r e D A V I S , S M I T H , a n d W I E N E R , C i r c u i t J u d g e s
. P E R C U R I A M : * A p p e a l i n g t h e j u d g m e n t i n a c r i m i n a l c a s e , T i m o t h y G e u r i n p r e s e n t s

a r g u m e n t s t h a t h e c o n c e d e s a r e f o r e c l o s e d b y U n i t e d S t a t e s v
. B r o w n , 9 2 0 F

. 2 d 1 2 1 2 , 1 2 1 6

- 1 7 ( 5 t h C i r
. 1 9 9 1 ) , a b r o g a t e d o n o t h e r g r o u n d s b y U n i t e d S t a t e s

v
. C a n d i a , 4 5 4 F

. 3 d 4 6 8 , 4 7 2

- 7 3 ( 5 t h C i r
. 2 0 0 6 ) , w h i c h h e l d t h a t a d i s t r i c t c o u r t

m a y o r d e r a t e r m o f i m p r i s o n m e n t t o r u n c o n s e c u t i v e l y w i t h a n u n i m p o s e d s t a t e

s e n t e n c e
. T h e G o v e r n m e n t ’ s m o t i o n f o r s u m m a r y a f

f i r m a n c e i s G R A N T E D , a n d
t h e j u d g m e n t o f t h e d i s t r i c t c o u r t i s A F F I R M E D

. U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s F i ft h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D August 17, 20 10 Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Purs uant to 5 T H C I R

. R. 47.5 , the cour t has d ete rm ined t hat this op inion sho uld not * be publ ish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t for th in 5 T H C I R

. R. 47.5 .4. Case: 10-10048 Document: 00511205901 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/17/2010
#### 1316.405-2 Cost-plus-award-fee contracts.

Insert clause 1352.216-72, *Determination of Award Fee,* in all cost-plus-award-fee contracts.
#### In the Matter of J. Harry Pincus, Also Known as Jacob H. Pincus, an Attorney, Respondent. Solomon A. Klein, Petitioner.

In this proceeding to discipline respondent, an attorney, upon 34 charges of professional miseon*885duet, the learned Referee to whom the issues were referred for hearing, has submitted his report, dated June 5,1964, in which he finds that 32 of the charges have been sustained and that 2 have not been sustained. The petitioner now moves for the confirmation of the Referee’s report and findings, and for the imposition of an appropriate measure of discipline. The 32 charges upon which the respondent was found guilty include the following: Twenty-four charges of converting to his own use, in 24 separate cases, various sums of money belonging to his clients; one charge of issuing checks drawn on a bank in which, to his knowledge, he had insufficient funds to pay the cheeks drawn by him; two charges of commingling clients’ funds with his own; one charge of failing to keep proper 'books and records reflecting the financial transactions with his clients; and four charges of violating the special rules of this court regulating the conduct of attorneys, in that: (a) he used retainer forms with the name of the attorney left blank; (ib) he continued to use retainer forms bearing the name of a former law firm which had been dissolved; and (e) he failed to render to his clients or to file with the Judicial Conference closing statements showing the allocation and disposition of the moneys received by him in settlement of contingent-fee negligence claims and actions. In addition, the Referee found that the respondent’s failure to produce certain of his records at the hearing before him, after he had directed respondent to produce the records and after a subpoena duces tecum had been served upon the respondent, was contumacious. The petitioner’s motion is granted; the Referee’s report and his findings are confirmed *in toio.*In our opinion his findings are amply supported by the proof. In view of the gross misconduct of this respondent, he must be disbarred; he clearly lacks the character and fitness requisite for an attorney and counselor at law. His name is directed to be struck from the roll of attorneys and counselors at law, effective 10 days after entry of the order hereon. Beldoek, P. J., Ug'hetta, Christ, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
19.808-1 Sole source. ( a ) The SBA may not accept for negotiation a sole-source 8(a) contract that exceeds $25 million unless the requesting agency has completed a justification in accordance with the requirements of 6.303.
( b ) The SBA is responsible for initiating negotiations with the agency within the time established by the agency. If the SBA does not initiate negotiations within the agreed time and the agency cannot allow additional time, the agency may, after notifying the SBA, proceed with the acquisition from other sources.
( c ) The SBA should participate, whenever practicable, in negotiating the contracting terms. When mutually agreeable, the SBA may authorize the contracting officer to negotiate directly with the 8(a) participant. Whether or not direct negotiations take place, the SBA is responsible for approving the resulting contract before award.
( d ) An 8(a) participant must represent that it is a small business in accordance with the size standard corresponding to the NAICS code assigned to the contract.
( e ) A concern must be a current participant in the 8(a) program at the time of an 8(a) sole-source award.
( f ) An 8(a) participant owned by an Alaska Native Corporation, Indian Tribe, Native Hawaiian Organization, or Community Development Corporation may not receive an 8(a) sole-source award that is a follow-on contract to an 8(a) contract, if the predecessor contract was performed by another 8(a) participant (or former 8(a) participant) owned by the same Alaska Native Corporation, Indian Tribe, Native Hawaiian Organization, or Community Development Corporation (See 13 CFR 124.109 through 124.111).
[54 FR 46005, Oct. 31, 1989, as amended at 55 FR 3883, Feb. 5, 1990; 56 FR 55378, Oct. 25, 1991; 61 FR 67421, Dec. 20, 1996; 76 FR 14562, Mar. 16, 2011; 80 FR 38298, July 2, 2015; 82 FR 4729, Jan. 13, 2017; 85 FR 62489, Oct. 2, 2020; 88 FR 69525, Oct, 5, 2023]
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

About EDOVERVIEW

FY 2012 Annual Performance Report and FY 2014 Annual Performance Plan: PDF (2M)

President's FY 2014 Budget Request for the U.S. Department of Education

|        |
|--------|
|   | Printable view |
|        |

## How Do I Find...

          - Student loans, forgiveness
          - College accreditation
          - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
          - FERPA
          - FAFSA
          - 1098, tax forms

More >

## Information About...

          - Transforming Teaching
          - Family and Community Engagement
          - Early Learning

 

|  |
|--|
|  |
|  | President's Education Budget Request |  |
|  |
|  | Budget Tables |  |
|  |
|  | Budget News |  |
|  |
|  | ED Budget Process and Calendar |  |
|  |

----

*Our mission*

Student Loans
Repaying LoansDefaulted LoansLoan ForgivenessLoan Servicers

Grants & Programs
Apply for Pell GrantsGrants ForecastApply for a GrantEligibility for Grants

Laws & Guidance
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)FERPACivil RightsNew IDEA Website

Data & Research
Education StatisticsPostsecondary Education DataED Data ExpressNation's Report CardWhat Works Clearinghouse

About Us
Contact UsED OfficesJobsPress ReleasesFAQsRecursos en españolBudget, PerformancePrivacy ProgramSubscribe to E-Mail Updates

----

          - Notices
          - FOIA
          - Privacy Policy
          - Accessibility
          - Security
          - Information quality
          - Inspector General
          - Whitehouse.gov
          - USA.gov
          - Benefits.gov
          - Regulations.gov
#### 1239.7300 Scope of subpart.

This subpart prescribes policies and procedures for incorporating technology modernization, upgrades, and refreshment into acquisitions involving information technology products or services supporting the development of applications, information systems, or system software.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-28-1997
<CASH>                                          20,430
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   61,877
<ALLOWANCES>                                       981
<INVENTORY>                                     93,163
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               192,468
<PP&E>                                         416,627
<DEPRECIATION>                                 278,282
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 358,770
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           68,313
<BONDS>                                         18,705
<COMMON>                                        21,925
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     200,949
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   358,770
<SALES>                                         99,688
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                99,688
<CGS>                                           73,997
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   90,974
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (562)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    40
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 284
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,952
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,462
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,490
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,490
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.39
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.39
        

</TABLE>
#### Ray Hawkins, Individually and on Behalf of All Other Common Stockholders of Tonopah Mining Company of Nevada, Similarly Situated, v. Thayer Lindsley et al.

Motion to dismiss appeal granted, with $10 costs, unless the appellant procures the record on appeal and appellant’s points to be served and filed on or before May 1, 1962, with notice of argument for the June 1962 Term of this court, said appeal to be argued or submitted when reached. Concur—Breitel, J. P., Rabin, Valente, McNally and Eager, JJ.
(February 6, 1979)

#### In the Matter of Artie Phillips, Petitioner, v Eugene S. LeFevre, *1032as Superintendent of the Clinton Correctional Facility, Respondent.

— Motion for permission to appeal to this court denied, without costs, as unnecessary. The order sought to be appealed is appealable as of right (CPLR 5701, subd [a], par 1). Mahoney, P. J., Greenblott, Sweeney, Main and Mikoll, JJ., concur.
**EXHIBIT      10.31**

----

----

**THIS      NOTE HAS NOT BEEN REGISTERED UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED (THE      “SECURITIES ACT”), OR ANY STATE SECURITIES LAW AND MAY NOT BE SOLD, TRANSFERRED      OR OTHERWISE DISPOSED OF UNLESS REGISTERED UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT AND UNDER      APPLICABLE STATE SECURITIES LAWS OR THE COMPANY SHALL HAVE RECEIVED AN OPINION      OF COUNSEL THAT REGISTRATION OF SUCH SECURITIES UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT AND      UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF APPLICABLE STATE SECURITIES LAWS IS NOT      REQUIRED.**

**ACCESS      PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.**

**7.5%      SECURED CONVERTIBLE PROMISSORY NOTE**

|  **U.S. $____________**  |  **Dallas,                Texas**                     |
|------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------|
|  **No.: PN-2006-__**          |  **December                ___,                2006** |

**FOR      VALUE RECEIVED**
** **

----

----

----

----

----

**7.**

** **

----

----

----

----

----

----

** **

----

----

----

----

----

**IN      WITNESS WHEREOF,**

**ACCESS      PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.**

|  By: |         |
|-----------|--------------|
|      |  Name:  |
|      |  Title: |

----

** **

----

----

|   |   |
|--------|--------|
|   |   |