alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6.2.2

Eastern Division

David D. Wilbon, et al.

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:12−cv−01132

Honorable M. David Weisman

Joseph M. Plovanich, et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Wednesday, July 25, 2018:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable M. David Weisman: Jury trial held. Jury

deliberations concluded. Jury trial ends. The jury returned a verdict. Judgment entered in

favor of plaintiffs David Wilbon, Rico Wilbon and George Smith and against defendants

Sarah McDermott, Mark Kushiner, Noel Esquivel, Jorge Cerda, and City of Chicago in

the amounts of $225,000 for David Wilbon, $40,000 for Rico Wilbon, and $25,000 for

George Smith. Judgment entered in favor of defendants Joseph Plovanich and Officer

Milan and against plaintiff David Wilbon. Judgment entered in favor of defendant

Antonio Valentin, and against plaintiffs David Wilbon, Rico Wilbon and George Smith.

Any post−trial motions shall be filed by 8/22/18. Status hearing set for 8/24/18 at 9:15

a.m. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice (ao,)

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:12-cv-01132 Document #: 536 Filed: 07/25/18 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:8015
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   Exhibit 10.21


                                                                  CONSOLIDATED
August 2, 1999                                                         WATER

VIA FAX: 1 210 224 6491

J. Bruce Bugg, Jr. Esq.,

Dear Bruce,

This fax is to confirm the options granted to you by the Board on July 20, 1999
in consideration of your continuing to act as Vice Chairman of the Company to
May 1, 2001 and of your assuming responsibility for leading certain initiatives,
agreed between you and the Board, in furtherance of the expansion of the
Company.

Date of Grant      # Ordinary Shares       Exercise Price        Exercise Period
-------------      -----------------       --------------        ---------------
July 20, 1999            30,000                US$6              to May 1, 2002
May 1, 2000              30,000           Market Oct 1, 99       to May 1, 2003

The Board expressed a desire to be kept informed of progress. If a decision is
needed between Board or Executive Committee Meetings, then a paper can be
circulated. Otherwise, a brief summary presented to each meeting would be
helpful.

The Board appreciates your efforts to date on behalf of the Company and I,
personally, look forward to continuing to work with you.



Yours sincerely,
CONSOLIDATED WATER CO. LTD.


/s/ Jeffrey M. Parker
---------------------------------------
Jeffrey M. Parker Chairman & C.E.O.






CONSOLIDATED WATER CO. Ltd, PO BOX 1114 GT, GRAND CAYMAN BRITISH WEST INDIES,
TEL: (345) 945 4277, FAX: (345) 945 2957, E-MAIL CWCO@CANDW.KY
<page>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of NT Media Corporation of California,
Inc., (the "Registrant") on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2008 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Ali Moussavi, Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial
Officer of the Registrant, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss..1350, as adopted pursuant to ss..906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d)
of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Registrant.



Date: May 18, 2009


By: /s/ Ali Moussavi
    ---------------------------
    Ali Moussavi,
    Chief Executive Officer and
    Acting Chief Financial Officer
1408.802 Policy. ( a ) *Duplicating* is the mass reproduction of materials beyond the capabilities of typical office copiers. Volumes are of sufficient mass quantities up to 5,000 single-page and 25,000 production units in the aggregate of multiple pages. Such duplicating units shall require Departmental approval to be processed through the Department of the Interior Publishing Council (DOIPC).
( b ) *Copying* is distinguished from “duplicating” in that such work is administrative in nature, produced on office copying equipment and produced as necessary, in limited quantities. Volumes typically range from 1 to 500 single-pages to 2,500 production units in the aggregate of multiple pages. This volume standard is referred to as the “500/2500” rule. Reproduction work exceeding the “500/2500” rule is duplicating, and requires a waiver from the nearest servicing GPO office. Employees should consult with their bureau printing officer or the DOIPC representative to secure such a waiver.
( c ) The DOIPC has been designated as the Department's liaison with the Joint Committee on Printing and GPO. Requirements for printing and related supplies shall be coordinated with the DOIPC or the designated bureau publications liaison officer in accordance with 314 DM 1.
#### 1413.305 Imprest fund.
U.S. Department of Education

Violence Against Women Act Negotiated Rulemaking Committee

Meeting Summary

February 24-25, 2014

Welcome

Jamienne Studley, Acting Under Secretary of the Department, welcomed the members of the 

Committee back for the second set of meetings and thanked them for their work to assist the 

Department in developing regulations to implement provisions of the Violence Against Women 

Act (VAWA). 

Review and Adopt Meeting Summary

The Committee members reviewed and approved, with minor changes, the draft meeting summary 

for their initial session in January. 

Review of Issues

The Committee members discussed in detail the draft regulation for changes to the Clery Act by 

VAWA that the Department circulated to members prior to the meeting session. Jessica Finkel, 

Jim Moore, and Brian Siegel of the Department also participated in portions of the Committee 

discussions.

Next Meeting

The next Committee session will be held on March 31 and April 1, 2014 at the U.S. Department 

of Education in the 8

th Floor Conference Center located at 1990 K Street, N.W. in Washington, 

D.C. Sessions will begin at 9:00 a.m. and conclude at 5:00 p.m. each day.

Next Steps

During the initial Committee sessions in January, the Committee established two subgroups to 

meet by telephone; these were the Stalking Subcommittee headed by Laura Dunn and the 

Prevention/Training Subcommittee headed by Nancy Chi Cantalupo. Each group held multiple 

calls and their leaders reported back to the full Committee at the start of the February sessions.

The Prevention/Training Subcommittee and a new Counting Subcommittee were asked to meet 

by telephone prior to the third set of Committee meetings to seek to develop advice and possible 

draft regulatory text for the full Committee and the Department to consider.

Public Comment

Opportunities were provided each day for the members of the public to provide comments.

Comments from the public were received at the end of each day.

Members Present

Non-federal Members:

Stephanie Atella

Rick Amweg

Connie Best
Draft – 11/06/13

2

Jerry Blakemore

Nancy Chi Cantalupo

S. Daniel Carter

Paul Denton

Jill Dunlap

Laura Dunn

Deana Echols 

Lisa Erwin

Caroline Fultz- Carver

Christine Gordon

Fatima Goss Graves

Dennis Gregory 

Bridgette Harwood

Michael Heidingsfield 

John Kelly

Alison Kiss

Denice Labertew

Jessica Ladd-Webert

Gary Lyle

Julie Poorman

Holly Rider-Milkovich 

Cat Riley

Dana Scaduto

Anthony Walker

Michael Webster

U.S. Department of Education:

Gail McLarnon
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

V. ) 12 CR 172-2

)

Chadia Abuied, )

Defendant )

AGREED MOTION TO MODIFY CONDITIONS OF BOND TO ALLOW TRAVEL TO BRAZIL

Now comes Chadia Abueid by her attorney Robert G. Clarke, requesting this court for an 

order allowing her to travel to Brazil from March 14, 2016 to March 28, 2016 and in support 

thereof states:

1. That Ms. Abueid was placed on three year probation on November 25, 2014,(Docs. 

111,112) by this court in a state and municipal tax evasion case stemming from the sale 

of unstamped cigarettes;

2. She has not incurred any violations of probation;

3. She is gainfully employed by a food distribution service, earning minimal amounts;

4. She now petitions to travel to Brazil to visit with family members regarding family 

matters;

5. Ms. Abueid grew up in Brazil before moving to Palestine;

6. Ms. Abueid was permitted to travel to Palestine before pleading guilty in 2014 by this 

court;

7. Ms. Abueid has submitted her itinerary to the Probation department which (Ms. Lisa 

Palmer) has no objection to her travelling to Brazil;

Case: 1:12-cr-00172 Document #: 141 Filed: 03/08/16 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:409
8. The prosecutor, Mr. Sunil R. Harjani, has no objection to this travel request.

9. That the plane tickets for Ms. Abueid (and her hotel accommodations) were generously 

purchased by her older brother Mr. Paulo Maali.

Wherefore Defendant prays that she be permitted to travel to Brazil.

Respectfully Submitted,

s/Robert G.Clarke, Attorney

Case: 1:12-cr-00172 Document #: 141 Filed: 03/08/16 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:410
PROOF OF SERVICE AND NOTICE OF FILING

Counsel for petitioner, Robert G. Clarke, hereby states that he has filed this motion to 

allow Petitioner Chadia Abueid to travel to Brazil with her family this 8th day of March, 2016 on 

the CM/ECF system which filing will send notification of such filing to other CM/ECF 

participants.

s/Robert G. Clarke, Attorney

Case: 1:12-cr-00172 Document #: 141 Filed: 03/08/16 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:411
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-10369

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ARNULFO RODRIGUEZ

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:05-CR-140-1

Before PRADO, OWEN, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Arnulfo Rodriguez has moved for

leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,

386 U.S. 738 (1967). Rodriguez has not filed a response. Our independent

review ofthe record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is

excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

April 16, 2008

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5



<S>                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                 74
<SECURITIES>                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                           0
<ALLOWANCES>                            0
<INVENTORY>                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                      630
<PP&E>                                  0
<DEPRECIATION>                          0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        704
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>             135,520
<BONDS>                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                             0
<COMMON>                           25,732
<OTHER-SE>                              0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>          704
<SALES>                                 0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        0
<CGS>                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                  143,240
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  (143,240)
<INCOME-TAX>                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>              (143,240)
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                     (143,240)
<EPS-BASIC>                           .04
<EPS-DILUTED>                           0




</TABLE>
Case: 1:12-cv-02009 Document #: 40 Filed: 09/11/12 Page 1 of 12 PageID #:210
Case: 1:12-cv-02009 Document #: 40 Filed: 09/11/12 Page 2 of 12 PageID #:211
Case: 1:12-cv-02009 Document #: 40 Filed: 09/11/12 Page 3 of 12 PageID #:212
Case: 1:12-cv-02009 Document #: 40 Filed: 09/11/12 Page 4 of 12 PageID #:213
Case: 1:12-cv-02009 Document #: 40 Filed: 09/11/12 Page 5 of 12 PageID #:214
Case: 1:12-cv-02009 Document #: 40 Filed: 09/11/12 Page 6 of 12 PageID #:215
Case: 1:12-cv-02009 Document #: 40 Filed: 09/11/12 Page 7 of 12 PageID #:216
Case: 1:12-cv-02009 Document #: 40 Filed: 09/11/12 Page 8 of 12 PageID #:217
Case: 1:12-cv-02009 Document #: 40 Filed: 09/11/12 Page 9 of 12 PageID #:218
Case: 1:12-cv-02009 Document #: 40 Filed: 09/11/12 Page 10 of 12 PageID #:219
Case: 1:12-cv-02009 Document #: 40 Filed: 09/11/12 Page 11 of 12 PageID #:220
Case: 1:12-cv-02009 Document #: 40 Filed: 09/11/12 Page 12 of 12 PageID #:221
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v David Buie, Appellant.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County, rendered January 24, 1977, convicting the defendant after a jury trial of seven counts of first degree robbery and sentencing him to concurrent terms of 4 to 12 years’ imprisonment to run concurrently with time owed on a prior conviction. The matter is remanded for a new and more complete *Wade*hearing and a final determination of this appeal is held in abeyance pending the results of that hearing. The principal issue presented on the appeal involves the admissibility of identification testimony, both station house and in court, by two witnesses who were victims of the robbery charged. The facts developed on the *Wade*hearing were insufficiently complete to permit this court to make a judgment on the question in terms of the criteria restated by the Supreme Court and extended to precourt identifications in *Manson v Brathwaite*(432 US 98), which was decided after the trial. Specifically, one of the witnesses was not called at the *Wade*hearing and the other, although called, was not permitted to be questioned with regard to his opportunity to observe at the time of the robbery. Some of these factual deficiencies were rectified by the trial testimony of these two witnesses, which was followed by a renewal of the motion addressed to the admissibility of the identification by one of the witnesses and a ruling by the Trial Judge reaffirming the conclusion reached by the hearing Judge. Nonetheless, we believe the information developed even at that point was inadequate. Moreover, the Trial Judge obviously did not have the opportunity to evaluate the facts known to him in terms of the principles set forth in the subsequently decided *Manson*decision. What is therefore required is a new *Wade*hearing in which there should be developed all facts relevant to a determination of the question pursuant to the criteria set forth in *Manson*and new findings by the trial court. We do not, of course, mean to intimate that a hearing of the kind here directed would be required in a case not presenting the unique circumstances here disclosed. Concur-Murphy, P. J., Silverman, Fein, Markewich and Sandler, JJ.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsNSSDC Conference on Mass Storage Systems and Technologies for Space and Earth Science Applications, volume 3This report contains copies of nearly all of the technical papers and viewgraphs presented at the National Space Science Data Center (NSSDC) Conference on Mass Storage Systems and Technologies for Space and Earth Science Applications. This conference served as a broad forum for the discussion of a number of important issues in the field of mass storage systems. Topics include magnetic disk and tape technologies, optical disk and tape, software storage and file management systems, and experiences with the use of a large, distributed storage system. The technical presentations describe, among other things, integrated mass storage systems that are expected to be available commercially. Also included is a series of presentations from Federal Government organizations and research institutions covering their mass storage requirements for the 1990s.Document ID19930005582Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeConference ProceedingsAuthorsKobler, Ben*(NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, MD, United States)*Hariharan, P. C.*(Hughes STX, Inc. Lanham, MD., United States)*Blasso, L. G.*(Hughes STX, Inc. Lanham, MD., United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateSeptember 1, 1992Subject CategoryDocumentation And Information ScienceReport/Patent NumberREPT-92B00093-VOL-3NASA-CP-3165-VOL-3NAS 1.55:3165-VOL-3Accession Number93N14771Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 656-80-02-26Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19930005582.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsIDRelationTitle19930005583WorkTribology of magnetic storage systems19930005584WorkNetwork issues for large mass storage requirements19930005585WorkThe role of HiPPI switches in mass storage systems: A five year prospective19930005586WorkThe National Space Science Data Center: An operational perspective19930005587WorkEOSDIS/DADS requirements19930005588WorkThe preservation of LANDSAT data by the National Land Remote Sensing Archive19930005589WorkStatus of emerging standards for removable computer storage media and related contributions of NIST19930005590WorkData management in NOAA19930005591WorkStorage needs in future supercomputer environments19930005592WorkRequirements for a network storage servicevisibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### 14.206 [Reserved]
### §1380. Maintenance of statistics by the Department of Homeland Security

#### (a) In general

The Department of Homeland Security shall maintain statistics regarding petitions filed, approved, extended, and amended with respect to nonimmigrants described in section 1101(a)(15)(L) of this title, including the number of such nonimmigrants who are classified on the basis of specialized knowledge and the number of nonimmigrants who are classified on the basis of specialized knowledge in order to work primarily at offsite locations.

#### (b) Applicability

Subsection (a) shall apply to petitions filed on or after the effective date of this subtitle.

(Pub. L. 108–447, div. J, title IV, §414, Dec. 8, 2004, 118 Stat. 3352.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This subtitle, referred to in subsec. (b), means subtitle A (§§411–417) of title IV of div. J of Pub. L. 108–447. For the effective date of subtitle A, see section 417 of Pub. L. 108–447, set out as an Effective Date of 2004 Amendment note under section 1184 of this title.

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the L–1 Visa (Intracompany Transferee) Reform Act of 2004, and also as part of the L–1 Visa and H–1B Visa Reform Act and the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2005, and not as part of the Immigration and Nationality Act which comprises this chapter.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective 180 days after Dec. 8, 2004, see section 417 of Pub. L. 108–447, set out as an Effective Date of 2004 Amendment note under section 1184 of this title.
### §958. Repealed. Pub. L. 104–66, title I, §1011(d), Dec. 21, 1995, 109 Stat. 709

Section, Pub. L. 101–624, title XV, §1558, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 3699, directed Secretary of Agriculture to collect information contained on peanut export documentation, including country of origin, and submit reports to Congress annually notwithstanding certain confidentiality provisions.
#### Mary I. Stone, Appellant, v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co., Defendant, and Olive Weinstein et al., Respondents.

Motion by appellant to stay a preclusion order, pending her appeal therefrom, granted. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Ughetta, Christ and Brennan, JJ., concur.