alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FY 2015 Annual Performance Report and FY 2017 Annual Performance Plan—U.S. Department of Education 5 

Overview 

About This Report

The United States Department of Education’s (the Department’s) FY 2015 Annual Performance 

Report (APR) and FY 2017 Annual Performance Plan (APP) provide information relative to the 

FY 2014–18 Strategic Plan. 

Again this year, the Department has consolidated its APR and APP in an effort to provide a 

more complete and meaningful picture of the Department’s past performance and plans for the 

2017 fiscal year. Because there is typically a delay of at least one year to allow for data 

collection for many of the Department’s performance metrics, annual trend data are not 

available for all metrics. 

About the Agency Financial Report

The FY 2015 Agency Financial Report (AFR), released in November 2015, provides detailed 

information on the Department’s financial performance and stewardship over its financial 

resources. Former Secretary Arne Duncan outlined accomplishments, ongoing initiatives, and 

management challenges for the Department in FY 2015 in his letter published in the AFR. 

FY 2015 Financial Highlights and Information

The Financial Highlights section of the AFR provides an overview and analysis of the 

Department’s sources of funds and financial position, including a section on trend analysis, to 

depict key financial activities for FY 2015 and to identify and explain significant trends. 

As an 11-time recipient of the Association of Government Accountants Certificate of Excellence 

in Accountability Reporting and having earned unmodified1(or “clean”) audit opinions for 

14 consecutive years, the Department remains committed to continuous improvement in its 

financial management, operations, and reporting. 

The AFR also provides a review of the Department’s financial summary and complete financial 

statements, including required supplementary stewardship information and notes to the principal 

financial statements for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2015, and September 30, 2014. 

Analysis of Controls, Systems, and Legal Compliance 

The Department is the smallest of 15 cabinet-level agencies in terms of government staff, with 

approximately 4,100 employees. In contrast, it has the third-largest grant portfolio among the 

26 federal grant-making organizations. To demonstrate effective stewardship of these 

resources, the Department has to implement effective controls over operations, systems, and 

financial reporting, as described in the Analysis of Controls, Systems, and Legal Compliance

section of the AFR. 

For more information regarding compliance with the Federal Managers’ Financial Integrity Act of 

1982 (P.L. 97-255) and Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-123, 

Management’s Responsibility for Internal Control, see the Management Assurances section of 

the AFR. 

 

1

“Unmodified” has the same meaning as the previous terminology, “unqualified.”
#### 1501.105-1 Publication and code arrangement.

The EPAAR will be published in: (a) The Federal Register, (b) cumulated form in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), and (c) a separate loose-leaf form in a distinctive light blue color.

[49 FR 8835, Mar. 8, 1984. Redesignated at 62 FR 33572, June 20, 1997]
11 TH C OURT OF A PPEALS

E ASTLAND

, T EXAS

J UDGMENT

Jerry Lee Martin

, * From the 104th District

Court of Taylor County,

Trial Court No. 18553B

.

Vs. No. 11

- 12

- 00362

- CR * February 7, 2013

State of Texas, * Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

(Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

McCall, J., and Willson , J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that the appeal should be

dismissed. Therefore, in accordance with this court ’ s opinion, the appeal is dismissed.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-2186
In Re: THOMAS D. DIXON, JR., Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Prohibition. (1:05-cr-00131-RDB; 1:05-cr-00599-RDB) Submitted: December 8, 2006 Decided: January 10, 2007 Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Thomas D. Dixon, Jr., Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Thomas D. Dixon, Jr., petitions this court for a writ of prohibition, seeking an order directing the district court to enjoin all criminal proceedings in Case No. 1:05-cr-00131-RDB and Case No. 1:05-cr-00599-RDB. We conclude that Dixon is not entitled to relief. A writ of prohibition should not issue unless it “clearly appears that the inferior court is about to exceed its jurisdiction.” Smith v. Whitney, 116 U.S. 167, 176 (1886). A writ of prohibition is a drastic remedy that should be granted only when the petitioner’s right to the requested relief is clear and indisputable. In re Vargas , 723 F.2d 1461, 1468 (10th Cir. 1983); In re Missouri , 664 F.2d 178, 180 (8th Cir. 1981). Further, a writ of prohibition should be granted only when the petitioner has no other adequate means of relief, In re Banker’s Trust Co. , 775 F.2d 545, 547 (3d Cir. 1985), and a writ of prohibition may not be used as a substitute for the normal appellate process. Missouri , 664 F.2d at 180. Dixon asserts that the district court lacks subject matter jurisdiction in both criminal prosecutions. However, Dixon’s petition for a writ of prohibition is moot with respect to Case No. 1:05-cr-00131-RDB, as that case was dismissed on November 6, 2006. With respect to Case No. 1:05-cr-00599-RDB, Dixon has failed to demonstrate that his right to relief is clear- 3 - and indisputable, or that this matter cannot be considered through the normal appellate process. Accordingly, because Dixon may challenge any adverse final judgment of the district court by direct appeal, the relief he seeks in this proceeding is not available. We therefore deny the petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
---

---

Exhibit 8

Scailex Corporation Ltd.  Tel Aviv, Israel52-003180-8
 The Scailex Group of Companies  as at December 31, 2007
 77.1%
 Petroleum Capital Holdings Ltd.Israel
 Scailex Vision Ltd.Israel
 15.76%
 Oil refineries Ltd.Israel
 Cshell 201(formerly Tech INK, SA)(in liquidation)
 SVA disbursementLLC(USA)
 Kovacs 183SA(in liquidation)
 Kovacs 319SA(in liquidation)
 Scailex VisionInternational Ltd.Israel
 15
 Jemtex Ink Jet Printing Ltd.Israel
 14.9
 RealTimeImage Ltd.Israel
 13.2
 Dor Ventures Israel Ltd.Israel




---

---
#### 1852.245-77 List of Government property furnished pursuant to FAR 52.245-2.

As prescribed in 1845.107-70(h), insert the following clause:

# List of Government Property Furnished Pursuant to FAR 52.245-2 (JAN 2011)

For performance of work under this contract, the Government will make available Government property identified below or in Attachment ____ [Insert attachment number or “not applicable”] of this contract on a nocharge-for-use basis pursuant to FAR 52.245-2, Government Property Installation Operation Services, as incorporated in this contract. The Contractor shall use this property in the performance of this contract at ____ [Insert applicable site(s) where property will be used] and at other location(s) as may be approved by the Contracting Officer.

[Insert a description of the item(s), acquisition date, quantity, acquisition cost, and applicable equipment information]

(End of clause)

[76 FR 2006, Jan. 12, 2011]
#### Hotel & Restaurant Clearance Corp., Respondent, *v.*Walz Credit Services, Incorporated, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

Order entered on September 7, 1960, denying appellant’s motion to vacate a warrant of attachment, unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondent. No opinion. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, McNally, Stevens, and Eager, JJ.
#### 1827.304 Procedures.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 1997 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         309,534
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   86,698
<ALLOWANCES>                                    18,102
<INVENTORY>                                    265,550
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               670,930
<PP&E>                                         956,313
<DEPRECIATION>                                 703,427
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 923,816
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          140,702
<BONDS>                                        204,277
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  2,361,440
<COMMON>                                       969,834
<OTHER-SE>                                 (2,752,437)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   923,816
<SALES>                                      2,054,847
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,057,208
<CGS>                                        1,531,856
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  358,007
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 4,815
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              11,370
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                151,160
<INCOME-TAX>                                    47,222
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            103,938
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   103,938
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
# Requests Report

# image1.png
**EXHIBIT99.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

** **

**SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

** **

**(18 U.S.C. SECTION1350)**

** **

 

Inconnection with the Annual Report of BancTec, Inc, a Delaware corporation (the“Company”), on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2002 as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Craig D. Crisman,President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to my knowledge:

 

(1) TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Craig D. Crisman                  |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|
|                                  |   |
| Craig D. Crisman                      |   |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |   |
|                                  |   |
| April 11, 2003                        |   |
|                                       |        |  |

 

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company andwill be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 

----
1819.7201 Scope of subpart. ( a ) This subpart implements the NASA Mentor-Protégé Program (hereafter referred to as the Program) as authorized by the Small Business Administration in accordance with 13 CFR 125.10. The purpose of the program is to: ( 1 ) Provide incentives to NASA contractors, performing under at least one active, approved subcontracting plan negotiated with NASA, to assist protégés in enhancing their capabilities to perform as viable NASA contractors, other Government contractors, and commercial suppliers on contract and subcontract requirements.
( 2 ) Increase the overall participation of protégés as subcontractors and suppliers under NASA contracts, other Federal agency contracts, and commercial contracts; and
( 3 ) Foster the establishment of long-term business relationships between protégés and mentors.
( b ) Under the Program, eligible entities approved as mentors will enter into mentor-protégé agreements (MPA) with eligible protégés to provide appropriate developmental assistance to enhance the capabilities of the protégés to perform as subcontractors and suppliers. NASA may provide the mentor award fee incentives. Additionally, this subpart explains the calculated subcontracting credit for a mentor-protégé program pursuant to FAR 52.219-9, Small Business Subcontracting Plan.
[74 FR 25672, May 29, 2009, as amended at 80 FR 12938, Mar. 12, 2015; 88 FR 69884, Oct. 10, 2023]
### §1963. Purpose and extent of loans

Loans may be made or insured under this subchapter for any purpose authorized for loans under subchapter I or II of this chapter and for crop or livestock changes that are necessitated by a quarantine, natural disaster, major disaster, or emergency and that are deemed desirable by the applicant, subject to the limitations on the amounts of loans provided in section 1964(a) of this title.

(Pub. L. 87–128, title III, §323, Aug. 8, 1961, 75 Stat. 311; Pub. L. 96–438, §3(b)(1), Oct. 13, 1980, 94 Stat. 1873; Pub. L. 104–127, title VI, §623, Apr. 4, 1996, 110 Stat. 1091; Pub. L. 107–171, title V, §5201(b), May 13, 2002, 116 Stat. 344.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this title", meaning title III of Pub. L. 87–128, Aug. 8, 1961, 75 Stat. 307, known as the Consolidated Farm and Rural Development Act, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of title III to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1921 of this title and Tables.

#### Amendments

2002—Pub. L. 107–171 inserted "quarantine," before "natural disaster".

1996—Pub. L. 104–127 inserted "that are necessitated by a natural disaster, major disaster, or emergency and that are" after "livestock changes".

1980—Pub. L. 96–438 substituted provisions relating to the purposes and extent of loans made or insured under this subchapter for provisions limiting loans to amounts certified by the county committee.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1996 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 104–127 effective 90 days after Apr. 4, 1996, see section 663(b) of Pub. L. 104–127, set out as a note under section 1922 of this title.

#### Effective Date of 1980 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 96–438 effective with respect to loans approved after Oct. 13, 1980, except for certain subsequent emergency loans, see section 3(d) of Pub. L. 96–438, set out as a note under section 1961 of this title.
#### In re SCHMIDT. In the matter of the appraisal of the estate of Anna M. Schmidt, deceased, under acts relating to the taxable transfers of property.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

November 13, 1903.)

No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.
Privacy Impact Assessment (PIA) for the 

Office of Communications and Outreach On-Line Registration System (cVent Event Solutions) 

This PIA was approved on and reviewed on by the system owner 

06/08/2018 

10/15/2012 06/08/2018 

certifying the information contained here is current and up to date. 

Contact Point 

Contact Person/Title: 

Contact Email: 

Adrain N. Walls/ Information Technology Specialist 

Adrain.Walls@ed.gov 

System Owner 

Program Office: 

Name/Title: 

Office of Communication & Outreach (OCO) 

Adrain N. Walls/ Information Technology Specialist 

Reviewing Official 

Kathleen Styles 

Chief Privacy Officer 

U.S. Department of Education 

Please submit completed Privacy Impact Assessments to the Privacy Safeguards Division at 

privacysafeguards@ed.gov.
# December 2021
C. A. No. 74-262.

#### State *v.*Claire Robichaud.

*Julius C. Michael-son,*Attorney General, *Nancy Marks Rahmes, Judith Romney Wegner,*Special Asst. Attorney Generals, for plaintiff.

*Bevilacqua & Cicilline,*for defendant.

The State’s motion to file xeroxed pages of portions of the transcript is granted.

Bevilacqua, C. J., not participating.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

EASTERN DIVISION 

 

THERESA MONTURANO, 

Derivatively on Behalf of Nominal 

Defendant GROUPON, INC., 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

ERIC P. LEFKOFSKY, PETER J. BARRIS, 

KEVIN J. EFRUSY, MELLODY HOBSON, 

BRADLEY A. KEYWELL, THEODORE J. 

LEONSIS, ANDREW D. MASON, 

and HOWARD SCHULTZ 

 Defendants, 

 and 

GROUPON, INC., 

 Nominal Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

 Case No. 12 CV 2507 

 Judge Joan H. Lefkow 

 

NOTICE OF MOTION

To: Counsel on the Attached Certificate of Service 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on Thursday, April 26, 2012, at 8:30 a.m., or as soon 

thereafter as counsel may be heard, we shall appear before Judge Lefkow, in the courtroom 

usually occupied by her, or any judge sitting in her stead, and then and there present 

Defendants’ Motion for Reassignment Based on Relatedness, a copy of which is hereby 

served upon you. 

Case: 1:12-cv-02507 Document #: 21 Filed: 04/19/12 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:91
2 

Dated: April 19, 2012 Respectfully submitted, 

ERIC P. LEFKOFSKY, PETER J. BARRIS, 

KEVIN J. EFRUSY, MELLODY HOBSON, 

BRADLEY A. KEYWELL, THEODORE J. 

LEONSIS, ANDREW D. MASON, 

and HOWARD SCHULTZ 

 By: /s/ Howard S. Suskin 

 Anton R. Valukas (Illinois Bar #2883678) 

Elizabeth A. Coleman (Illinois Bar #6236597) 

Howard S. Suskin (Illinois Bar #6185999) 

Marc D. Sokol (Illinois Bar #6276263) 

JENNER & BLOCK LLP 

353 N. Clark Street 

Chicago, IL 60654-3456 

Tel: (312) 222-9350

Case: 1:12-cv-02507 Document #: 21 Filed: 04/19/12 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:92
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

 I, Marc D. Sokol, an attorney, hereby certify that on April 19, 2012, I caused copies of 

the foregoing Defendants’ Motion for Reassignment Based on Relatedness to be served on: 

Via ECF: 

Marvin Alan Miller, at MMiller@MillerLawLLC.com

Lori Ann Fanning, at LFanning@MillerLawLLC.com 

Miller Law LLC 

115 South LaSalle Street 

Suite 2910 

Chicago, Illinois 60603 

Attorneys for Plaintiff Theresa Monturano 

Via Messenger: 

Adam J. Levitt 

John E. Tangren 

Edmund S. Aronowitz 

Wolf Haldenstein Adler Freeman & Herz LLC 

55 West Monroe Street 

Suite 1111 

Chicago, Illinois 60603 

Attorneys for Plaintiff Kent Wong 

 s/Marc D. Sokol 

 Marc D. Sokol 

Case: 1:12-cv-02507 Document #: 21 Filed: 04/19/12 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:93
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
applicable SEC Form and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000             DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000             JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           13237                   13747
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     3156                    3269
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                       1331                    1577
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 19298                   19470
<PP&E>                                           19557                   19928
<DEPRECIATION>                                   12494                   12958
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   29546                   29838
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             1969                    2751
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                          9573                    9597
<OTHER-SE>                                       17337                   16916
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     29546                   29838
<SALES>                                           4602                    9156
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  4602                    9156
<CGS>                                             2897                    5870
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     2897                    5870
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  1778                    3600
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                     100
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (224)                   (461)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    151                      47
<INCOME-TAX>                                       105                     151
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 46                   (104)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                        46                   (104)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .01                   (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01                   (.01)


</TABLE>
#### 1409.405-1 Continuation of current contracts.

The HCA, without authority to redelegate, is authorized to take the actions listed in FAR 9.405-1.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN THE INTEREST OF M. S. V., JR.,

MINOR CHILD

,

Appellant

. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 20

- 00088

- CV

Appeal from the

38 8 th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 201 2 DCM10 912 )

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Appell ant ’s third motion for extension of time within which to

file the brief until December 2 , 2020. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

TO FILE THE APPELL ANT ’S BRIEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ordered that Veronica C havez Vara, Pro Se, prepare the Pro Se ’ s Brief and

forward the same to this Court on or before December 2 , 2020.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 16 t h day of October , 2020.

PER CURIAM

Before Alley, C.J., Rodriguez and Palafox, JJ.