alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### 2052.215-70 Key personnel.

As prescribed at 2015.209-70(a)(1), the contracting officer shall insert in solicitations and contracts the following clause as applicable to the requirement:

# Key Personnel (JAN 1993)

(a) The following individuals are considered to be essential to the successful performance of the work hereunder:

*

The contractor agrees that personnel may not be removed from the contract work or replaced without compliance with paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section.

(b) If one or more of the key personnel, for whatever reason, becomes, or is expected to become, unavailable for work under this contract for a continuous period exceeding 30 work days, or is expected to devote substantially less effort to the work than indicated in the proposal or initially anticipated, the contractor shall immediately notify the contracting officer and shall, subject to the con currence of the contracting officer, promptly replace the personnel with personnel of at least substantially equal ability and qualifications.

(c) Each request for approval of substitutions must be in writing and contain a detailed explanation of the circumstances necessitating the proposed substitutions. The request must also contain a complete resume for the proposed substitute and other information requested or needed by the contracting officer to evaluate the proposed substitution. The contracting officer and the project officer shall evaluate the contractor's request and the contracting officer shall promptly notify the contractor of his or her decision in writing.

(d) If the contracting officer determines that suitable and timely replacement of key personnel who have been reassigned, terminated, or have otherwise become unavailable for the contract work is not reasonably forthcoming, or that the resultant reduction of productive effort would be so substantial as to impair the successful completion of the contract or the service order, the contract may be terminated by the contracting officer for default or for the convenience of the Government, as appropriate. If the contracting officer finds the contractor at fault for the condition, the contract price or fixed fee may be equitably adjusted downward to compensate the Government for any resultant delay, loss, or damage.

*To be incorporated into any resultant contract

(End of clause)
# EXHIBIT 11

# TELLABS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

|                                             |  |              |     
|-------------------------------------------- |  | ------------ | ----
|(In millions, except per-share data)         |  | 2003         |     
|                                            
|The following chart sets forth the           | 
|computation of loss per share:               | 
|Numerator:                                   | 
|Net loss                                     |  | $      (241  | .6) 
|Denominator:                                 | 
|Denominator for basic loss per share -       |  | 413          | .1  
|weighted-average shares outstanding          | 
|Effect of dilutive securities:               | 
|Employee stock options and awards            |  | --           |     
|                                            
|Denominator for diluted loss per share -     | 
|adjusted weighted-average shares             |  | 413          | .1  
|outstanding and assumed conversions          | 
|Earnings (loss) per share, basic and diluted |  | $         (0 | .58)

Under G.A.A.P., dilutive securities are not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share when a company is
in a net loss position.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Disaster Declarations of Economic Injury for the Coronavirus (COVID-19)]

# AGENCY:

U.S. Small Business Administration.

# ACTION:

Amendment 1.

# SUMMARY:

This is an amendment to the Economic Injury Disaster Loan (EIDL) declarations issued for each State and Territory of the U.S.

*Incident:*                         Coronavirus (COVID-19).                    

*Incident Period:*                         01/31/2020 and continuing.                    

# DATES:

Issued 12/30/2020.

*Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date*: 12/31/2021.                    

# ADDRESSES:

Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The notice of the Economic Injury declarations for each State and Territory of the U.S., dated between 03/16/2020 to 03/21/2020, is hereby amended to extend the deadline date for filing applications for economic injury as a result of this disaster to 12/31/2021. For additional information, please visit                     *SBA.gov/disaster.*                     For questions, please contact the SBA disaster assistance customer service center at 1-800-659-2955 (TTY: 1-800-877-8339) or email                     *disastercustomerservice@sba.gov.*

All other information in the original declaration remains unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

Jovita Carranza,

Administrator.

[FR Doc. 2021-00171 Filed 1-7-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8026-03-P
#### Annelis Frenkel et al. *v.*Town Plan and Zoning Commission of the Town of Fairfield et al.

*Robert F. Field,*in support of the petition.

*Bernard Green,*in opposition.

Submitted October 21

decided November 1, 1974

The petition for certification by the defendant Kosow Construction Corporation for appeal from the Court of Common Pleas in Fairfield County is denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         149,401
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   15,510
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               293,005
<PP&E>                                       9,206,846
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,071,953
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,441,242
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          857,458
<BONDS>                                      4,994,147
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,410,363)<F1>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,441,242
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            13,065,661
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,387,567
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             589,141
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             10,088,953
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         10,088,953
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                10,088,953
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 4,565.70<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>THIS ENTITY IS A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP. THE OTHER STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY LINE
REPRESENTS TOTAL PARTNERSHIP EQUITY.
<F2>THE EPS-PRIMARY LINE REPRESENTS NET INCOME PER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP UNIT.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
<college_financing_plan>
<total_cost_of_attendance>
<tuition_and_fees>$X,XXXX</tuition_and_fees>
<housing_and_food_on_campus>$X,XXXX</housing_and_food_on_campus>
<housing_and_food_off_campus>$X,XXXX</housing_and_food_off_campus>
<books_and_supplies>$X,XXXX</books_and_supplies>
<transportation>$X,XXXX</transportation>
<other_education_costs>$X,XXXX</other_education_costs>
<estimated_costs_on_campus>$X,XXXX</estimated_costs_on_campus>
<estimated_costs_off_campus>$X,XXXX</estimated_costs_off_campus>
</total_cost_of_attendance>
<student_aid_index>
<based_on_fafsa>X,XXXX</based_on_fafsa>
<based_on_institutional_methodology>$X,XXXX</based_on_institutional_methodology>
</student_aid_index>
<scholarships>
<scholarships_from_your_school>$X,XXXX</scholarships_from_your_school>
<scholarships_from_your_state>$X,XXXX</scholarships_from_your_state>
<other_scholarships>$X,XXXX</other_scholarships>
<employer_paid_tuition_benefits>$X,XXXX</employer_paid_tuition_benefits>
<total_scholarships>$X,XXXX</total_scholarships>
</scholarships>
<grants>
<federal_pell_grants>$X,XXXX</federal_pell_grants>
<institutional_grants>$X,XXXX</institutional_grants>
<state_grants>$X,XXXX</state_grants>
<other_forms_of_grant_aid>$X,XXXX</other_forms_of_grant_aid>
<total_grants>$X,XXXX</total_grants>
</grants>
<va-education-benefit>$X,XXXX</va-education-benefit>
<net_price>$X,XXXX</net_price>
<loan_options>
<federal_direct_subsidized_loan>$X,XXXX</federal_direct_subsidized_loan>
<federal_direct_subsidized_loan_interest_rate>x.xx%</federal_direct_subsidized_loan_interest_rate>
<federal_direct_subsidized_loan_origination_fee>x.xx%</federal_direct_subsidized_loan_origination_fee>
<federal_direct_unsubsidized_loan>$X,XXXX</federal_direct_unsubsidized_loan>
<federal_direct_unsubsidized_loan_interest_rate>x.xx%</federal_direct_unsubsidized_loan_interest_rate>
<federal_direct_unsubsidized_loan_origination_fee>x.xx%</federal_direct_unsubsidized_loan_origination_fee>
<total_loan_options>X,XXXX</total_loan_options>
</loan_options>
<work_options>
<work_study>$X,XXXX</work_study>
<work_study_hours>XX /wk</work_study_hours>
<other_campus_job>$X,XXXX</other_campus_job>
<total_work_options>$X,XXXX</total_work_options>
</work_options>
</college_financing_plan>
----

----

Exhibit 32.1 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 

|   | 1. | Fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer. |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                        |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                                        |   |
| /s/ Jay Gottlieb                                                            |   |
| Jay GottliebChief Executive and Principal Officer August 13, 2009 |   |

----

----
#### 12.206 Use of past performance.

Past performance should be an important element of every evaluation and contract award for commercial products and commercial services. Contracting officers should consider past performance data from a wide variety of sources both inside and outside the Federal Government in accordance with the policies and procedures contained in subpart 9.1, section 13.106, or subpart 15.3, as applicable.

[60 FR 48241, Sept. 18, 1995, as amended at 61 FR 39192, July 26, 1996; 62 FR 51270, Sept. 30, 1997; 62 FR 64917, Dec. 9, 1997; 86 FR 61022, Nov. 4, 2021]
1833.103 Protests to the agency. ( d ) ( 4 ) The provision at 1852.233-70 provides for an alternative to a protest to the United States Government Accountability Office (GAO). This alternative gives bidders or offerors the ability to protest directly to the contracting officer (CO) or to request an independent review by the Assistant Administrator for Procurement (or designee). The Agency review shall be deemed to be at the CO level when the request is silent as to the level of review desired. The Agency review shall be deemed to be at the level of the Assistant Administrator for Procurement (or designee) when the request specifies a level above the CO, even if the request does not specifically request an independent review by the Assistant Administrator for Procurement. Such reviews are separate and distinct from the Ombudsman Program described at 1815.7001.
( e ) NASA shall summarily dismiss and take no further action upon any protest to the Agency if the substance of the protest is pending in judicial proceedings or the protester has filed a protest on the same acquisition with the GAO prior to receipt of an Agency protest decision. ( 4 ) When a bidder or offeror submits an Agency protest to the CO or alternatively requests an independent review by the Assistant Administrator for Procurement, the decision of the CO or the Assistant Administrator for Procurement shall be final and is not subject to any appeal or reconsideration within NASA.
[80 FR 36721, June 26, 2015]
### The Honorable Susan Webber Wright, United States Distric t 1 

### Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas. ___________ No. 95-2701

___________ Renardo J. Boyd, Sr., * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Arkansas. Centers for Youth and Families, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: March 20, 1996 Filed: March 29, 1996

___________ Before McMILLIAN, WOLLMAN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Renardo J. Boyd, Sr., app eals the district court's grant of summary 1 judgme nt to defendant in his employment discrimination action. Havin g carefully reviewed the record and the parties' briefs we conclude that the dist rict court's judgment was correct and that an opinion would lac k precedential value. The judgment is affirmed. See8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

Washington, DC 20202

400 MARYLAND AVE., S.W., WASHINGTON, DC 20202

www.ed.gov

The Department of Education's mission is to promote student achievement and preparation for global 

competitiveness by fostering educational excellence and ensuring equal access.

1. Borrowers 62+ carrying debt for 15+ years

o Any borrower age 62+: 2.6M (out of 45.5M total borrowers)

 Has debt on a loan (any type) that initially entered repayment 15+ years ago: 1.48M (Note: a 

loan may not have been continuously in repayment for this period.)

 Has debt on a non-Parent PLUS loan that initially entered repayment 15+ years ago: 1.16M

 Has debt on both non-Parent PLUS loan(s) and on Parent PLUS loans, and at least one of 

those outstanding loans initially entered repayment 15+ years ago: 78K

 Only has debt on Parent PLUS loans that initially entered repayment 15+ years ago: 312k

2. Parent PLUS loan data 

• Among borrowers who had a Parent PLUS disbursement for Award Year 2000 or after, in 

59% of those cases, the dependent student whose education was supported with the 

PLUS loan also received a Pell Grant. 

This is from a separate data run

• There are 3.9 million Parent PLUS (PPLUS) borrowers with outstanding PPLUS loans, as 

of January 2023

• There are 2.2 million PPLUS borrowers whose student also received a Pell Grant as of 

January 2023.

• There are 566,000 PPLUS borrowers who received a Pell Grant for their own schooling, 

as of January 2023.

• These are borrowers who either have open PPLUS loans with positive balances or open 

Parent PLUS debt in the form of consolidation loans with positive balances.
1350.102-1 Delegation of authority. ( a ) The designee authorized to approve requests to obligate the government in excess of $55,000 under the extraordinary emergency authority set forth in CAM 1301.70. Such authority may not be delegated below the secretarial level for requests to obligate the Government in excess of $55,000.
( b ) The designee authorized to approve any amendment without consideration that increases the contract price or unit price is set forth in CAM 1301.70.
( c ) The designee authorized to indemnify against unusually hazardous or nuclear risks, including extension of such indemnification to subcontracts, is set forth in CAM 1301.70.
Order Form (01/2005)

United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois

Name of Assigned Judge

or Magistrate Judge Gary Feinerman Sitting Judge if Otherthan Assigned Judge

CASE NUMBER 12 C 660 DATE 10/15/2012

CASE

TITLE

Jones, et al. Vs. Capital Grille Holdings, et al.

DOCKET ENTRY TEXT

Defendants’ motions to stay the California and New York claims pending dispute resolution process [68] [71] are

entered and continued. For the reasons stated in open court, the California claims (set forth in the California complaint,

Doc. 35) are severed and transferred to the Central District of California. For the reasons stated in open court, the New

York claims (set forth in the New York complaint, Doc. 34) are severed and transferred to the Southern District of New

York. The Clerk is requested to effectuate the transfers forthwith, without regard to the presumptive fourteen-day

period set forth in Local Rule 83.4.

Docketing to mail notices.

 Courtroom Deputy

Initials:

JD

12C660 Jones, et al. Vs. Capital Grille Holdings, et al. Page 1 of 1

Case: 1:12-cv-00660 Document #: 76 Filed: 10/15/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:575
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of AXCESS International Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB
for the period ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, Allan Griebenow, President, Chief Executive Officer and Principal
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as applicable; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods
indicated. /S/ ALLAN GRIEBENOWAllan Griebenow
President, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Executive Officer Dated: March 31, 2005
Exhibit 32.1

CHASE GENERAL CORPORATION

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of
Chase General Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Barry M. Yantis, as Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|             |  |                                                   
|------------ |  | --------------------------------------------------
|May 17, 2011 |  | /s/ Barry M. Yantis                               
|Date         |  | Barry M. Yantis                                   
|             |  | Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive officer and
|             |  | Chief Financial Officer, President and Treasurer  



27
#### 14.207 Pre-bid conference.

A pre-bid conference may be used, generally in a complex acquisition, as a means of briefing prospective bidders and explaining complicated specifications and requirements to them as early as possible after the invitation has been issued and before the bids are opened. It shall never be used as a substitute for amending a defective or ambiguous invitation. The conference shall be conducted in accordance with the procedure prescribed in 15.201.

[48 FR 42171, Sept. 19, 1983, as amended at 62 FR 51270, Sept. 30, 1997]
# August 2023 FOIA Log
#### Harriett Sommer, Appellant, v. Abraham Sommer, Respondent.

Order, entered on November 10, 1961, granting defendant’s motion to dismiss the first and third causes of action pursuant to rule 107 of the Rules of Civil Practice, unanimously modified, on the law and in the exercise of discretion, to the extent of granting plaintiff leave to amend her complaint and in any event without prejudice to her bringing another action in this or any other jurisdiction if so advised, and, as so modified, affirmed, without costs. We are constrained to uphold the dismissal of the causes of action seeking declaratory judgment to the effect that the decree of divorce issued in Alabama is null and void and seeking other relief as well (see *Senor*v. *Senor,*272 App. Div. 306, affd. 297 N. Y. 800). It may be, however, that there are additional facts which could be pleaded by plaintiff that will cure the defects in the present complaint or that she may be able to obtain similar or related relief in another jurisdiction. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, McNally and Eager, JJ. [31 Misc 2d 826.]