alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Emerson Radio Corp., (the Company)
on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2003, filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission , Geoffrey P. Jurick, Chief Executive Officer, and
Kenneth A. Corby, Chief Financial Officer, of the Company each hereby certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates
presented and the consolidated result of operations of the Company for the
periods presented.

|                         |                              |                            
|------------------------ | ---------------------------- | ---------------------------
|Dated: February 17, 2004 |                              |                            
|                         |                              |                            
|                         | By:                          | /s/ Geoffrey P. Jurick     
|                         |                              |                            
|                         | Geoffrey P. Jurick          
|                         | Chief Executive Officer     
|                         |                              |                            
|                         | By:                          | /s/ Kenneth A. Corby_______
|                         |                              |                            
|                         | Executive Vice President and
|                         | Chief Financial Officer     

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,
Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of
the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Emerson Radio Corp. and
will be retained by Emerson Radio Corp. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
05/12/201 1 17:5 6 FAX202493514 2 FA A • > DMS 0001/00 2 

# e
U.S
. Departmen t o fTronsportgtto n Federa ( Aviatio n Administratio n Han d Delivere d Ma y11 , ?.01 1 Federa l Aviatio nAdministratio n 60 0 Independenc e Avenue , S W Wilbu r Wrigh t Buildin g • Suit e 2W100 0 Washington , D.C . 2059 1 Attn : Appellat e Docke t Clerk , AGC-43 0 VA'TiMENTO F -'•DOniATiO N
Offic e o fth e Chie fCounse l , ^
. 60 0 Independenc e Avenue , S. W EnfofcftmentDivisio n ., i l\ \ ! 3 A'-i:V?>#ington , D.C
. 2069 1

.V^"'< i;. ; : B

M • V 

### ' 2wii 

## -^BARIN G DOCKE T

Re ; T nth eMatte r

o f Empir eAirline^ r

Inc. , FA

ADocke t No
. CP09NM000 9 Dea r Si r o r Madam : Pursuan t t o 1 4 C.F.R . §13.23 3 (c ) (1) , bot hth e Complainan t and Responden t reques t mutua l extension s o f tim e unti l Jun e 22 , 2011 , fo r th e filin qo f thei r respectj,ve appea l brief s i n th e above-reference d matter . Th e appea l brief s ar e presentl ydu e May23 , 2011 . Sincerely ,

Jame s A , Barr y Senio r Attorne y F:nforcemen t Division , AGC-30 0 Offic e o f th e Chie f Counse l (202 ) 267-819 8
cc : Courtne yE . Felts , F.sq .05/12/201 1 17:5 G FA X202493514 2 FA A* DM S gl002/00 2



### r i Certificat e o f Servic e I herebycertif ytha t o nthi s dat e I hav e place d i n th e Unite d State s mail , postag e prepaid , certifie d return-receip t requested , an d sen t byemai l transmission , a cop yo f Complainant' s Entr yo f Appearanc e Lette r I nth e Matte r o £Ejnpire Airlines , Inc
. , FA ADocke t No . CP09NM0009 , addresse d tO : Courtne yE . Felts , Esq . Senio r Attorne y Federa l Express , Inc . 3 6 2 0 Hack s Cros s Roa d Buildin g B , 3"" ^ Floo r Memphis , Tennesse e 38125-880 0 I naddition , I herebycertif ytha t o nthi s dat e I hav e hand-delivere d th e origina l an d on e cop yo f th e foregoin g documen t i nth e Unite d State s mail , postag e prepaid , certifie d return-receip t requested , addresse d to : Federa l Aviatio nAdministratio n 60 0 Independenc e Avenue , S W Wilbu r Wrigh t Buildin g - Suit e 2W100 0 Washington , D.C . 2059 1 Attn ; Appellat e Docke t Clerk , AGC-43 0 

## Bn^t'T^6<^Kr^ K Dated ; May11 , 201 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 5.0.3

Eastern Division

James E. Henders

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:12−cv−01147

Honorable Joan B. Gottschall

Gregg Appliances, Inc., et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Monday, November 5, 2012:

 MINUTE entry before Honorable Mary M. Rowland:Settlement conference held

on 11/5/2012. Parties have reached an agreement. Parties will file a stipulation to dismiss

by 11/30/2012.Mailed notice(gel, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:12-cv-01147 Document #: 36 Filed: 11/05/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:88
- FAA Home
        - About FAA
        - Jobs
        - News
        - Library
        - Pilots
        - Travelers
        - Mechanics
        - More

Search: A-Z Index

FAA Home

      - Aircraft
      - Airports & Air Traffic
      - Data & Statistics
      - Education & Research
      - Licenses & Certificates
      - Regulations & Policies
      - Safety

        - Library Topics           - Charts & Diagrams
          - Forms
          - Glossaries
          - Handbooks & Manuals             - Aircraft
            - Aviation
            - Examiners & Inspectors
          - Media Library
          - Online Libraries
          - Plans
          - Publications
          - Reports

FAA Home»Library»Handbooks & Manuals»Aviation»

        - Print
        - Email

# System Safety Handbook

Updated: 2:03 pm ET May 21, 2008

## Table of Contents

          - Introduction to the System Safety Handbook  (PDF)
          - System Safety Policy and Process  (PDF)
          - Principles of System Safety  (PDF)
          - Safety Assesment Before Investment Decision  (PDF)
          - Post-Investment Decision Safety Activities  (PDF)
          - System Safety Guidelines for Contracting  (PDF)
          - Integrated System Hazard Analysis  (PDF)
          - Safety Analysis: Hazard Analysis Tasks  (PDF)
          - Analysis Techniques  (PDF)
          - System Software Safety  (PDF)
          - Test and Evaluation Safety  (PDF)
          - Facilities System Safety  (PDF)
          - The Application of System Safety To the Commercial Launch Industry  (PDF)
          - System Safety Training  (PDF)
          - Operational Risk Management  (PDF)
          - Operational Safety in Aviation  (PDF)
          - Human Factors Engineering and Safety: Principles and Practices  (PDF)

## Appendices

          - Glossary  (PDF)
          - Comparative Risk Assessment Form  (PDF)
          - Government References  (PDF)
          - Structural Analysis and Formal Methods  (PDF)
          - System Safety Principles  (PDF)
          - ORM Details and Examples  (PDF)
          - Order 8040.4  (PDF)
          - Standard Practice for System Safety  (PDF)
          - Not used
          - Software Safety  (PDF)

2:03 pm ET May 21, 2008

U.S. Department of Transportation		Federal Aviation Administration		800 Independence Avenue, SW		Washington, DC 20591		1-866-TELL-FAA (1-866-835-5322)

      - Web Policies & Notices
      - Privacy Policy
      - FOIA
      - Forms
      - Site Map
      - Frequently Asked Questions
      - Contact FAA
      - OIG Hotline
      - USA.gov

Readers & Viewers
      - PDF
      - Powerpoint
      - Zip
      - Word
      - Excel
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 10 (Friday, January 15, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 4151]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-01101]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

FEDERAL REGISTER CITATION OF PREVIOUS ANNOUNCEMENT:  86 FR 1557, 
January 8, 2021.

PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED TIME AND DATE OF THE MEETING: Wednesday, January 
13, 2021 at 2:00 p.m.

CHANGES IN THE MEETING: The Closed Meeting scheduled for Wednesday, 
January 13, 2021 at 2:00 p.m. has been changed to Wednesday, January 
13, 2021 at 2:30 p.m. In addition, the following matter will also be 
considered:
    <bullet> Other matters relating to examination matters and 
enforcement proceedings.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: For further information and to 
ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, 
please contact the Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

    Dated: January 13, 2021.
Vanessa A. Countryman,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-01101 Filed 1-13-21; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
1819.7302 NASA contract clauses. ( a ) Contracting officers shall insert the clause at 1852.219-80, Limitation on Subcontracting—SBIR Phase I Program, in all Phase I contracts awarded under the Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Program established pursuant to Public Law 97-219 (the Small Business Innovation Development Act of 1982).
( b ) Contracting officers shall insert the clause at 1852.219-81, Limitation on Subcontracting—SBIR Phase II Program, in all Phase II contracts awarded under the Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Program established pursuant to Public Law 97-219 (the Small Business Innovation Development Act of 1982).
( c ) Contracting officers shall insert the clause at 1852.219-82, Limitation on Subcontracting—STTR Program, in all contracts awarded under the Small Business Technology Transfer (STTR) Program established pursuant to Public Law 97-219 (the Small Business Innovation Development Act of 1982). Occasionally, deviations from this requirement may be approved. Any deviations from this requirement shall be approved in writing by the contracting officer after coordination with the Agency SBIR Program Manager/Coordinator.
( d ) Contracting officers shall insert the clause at 1852.219-83, Limitation of the Principal Investigator—SBIR Program, in all contracts awarded under the Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Program established pursuant to Public Law 97-219 (the Small Business Innovation Development Act of 1982). Occasionally, deviations from this requirement may be approved. Any deviations from this requirement shall be approved in writing by the contracting officer after coordination with the Agency SBIR Program Manager/Coordinator.
( e ) Contracting officers shall insert the clause at 1852.219-84, Limitation of the Principal Investigator—STTR Program, in all contracts awarded under the Small Business Technology Transfer (STTR) Program established pursuant to Public Law 97-219 (the Small Business Innovation Development Act of 1982). Occasionally, deviations from this requirement may be approved. Any deviations from this requirement shall be approved in writing by the contracting officer after coordination with the Agency SBIR Program Manager/Coordinator.
( f ) Contracting officers shall insert the clause at 1852.219-85, Conditions for Final Payment—SBIR and STTR Contracts, in all Phase I and Phase II contract awarded under the Small Business Technology Transfer (STTR) Program and the Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Program established pursuant to Public Law 97-219 (The Small Business Innovation Development Act of 1982.)
[71 FR 61688, Oct. 19, 2006, as amended at 80 FR 12939, Mar. 12, 2015]
#### Hughes *v.*Ellis.

February 11, 1913.

Equitable petition. Before Judge Morris. Forsyth superior court. August 29, 1911.

*J. P. Brooke*and *Bell & Ellis,*for plaintiff.

*G. L. Harris*and *Gober & Griffin,*for defendant.

Atkinson, J.

On July 4th, 1907, Nancy E. Hughes, widow and sole heir of J. M. Hughes, executed a deed to Elizabeth C. Ellis. The consideration recited was natural love and affection, one dollar in hand paid, “and for the purpose of carrying out an often-expressed purpose of the said J. M. Hughes in his lifetime.” The deed purported to convey to the grantee for and during her natural life “what is known as the home-place on the farm of said J. M. Hughes whereon he lived at the time of his death,” embracing a number of designated lots containing 420 acres, more or less. Immediately following the designation of the lots there occurred in the deed the words, “reserving, keeping, and retaining unto myself the right to a home with said party of the second part, either in the dwelling-house where said J. M. Hughes lived at the time of his death, or in any other house already built or that may be built on said lands and occupied by said party of the second part during my lifetime; to have and to hold said tract or parcel of land together with all and singular the rights, privileges, and appurtenances thereto belonging or in any wise appertaining, to the only proper, use, benefit, and behoof of said party of the second part for and during her natural alife, subject to the reservation of a home for myself during my natural lifetime as hereinbefore specified, and the rents coming in from said place the present year, which do not pass under this deed.” *Held:*

1. The deed conveyed to the grantee a life-estate, with a reservation of the right of the grantor to live on the land as a home; and if the conduct of the grantee is such that the grantor can not peaceably and comfortably live in the house, the remedy of the grantor is an action for damages, and not for rescission of the deed. The fact that the grantee had no other property than the property described in the deed, and was insolvent, does not alter the case.

2. The, petition was properly dismissed on general demurrer.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Beoh, J., absent. The other Justices concur.*
### §5679. Biotechnology and agricultural trade program

#### (a) Establishment

There is established in the Department the biotechnology and agricultural trade program.

#### (b) Purpose

The purpose of the program shall be to remove, resolve, or mitigate significant regulatory nontariff barriers to the export of United States agricultural commodities (as defined in section 5602 of this title) into foreign markets through public and private sector projects funded by grants that address—

(1) quick response intervention regarding nontariff barriers to United States exports involving—

(A) United States agricultural commodities produced through biotechnology or new agricultural production technologies;

(B) food safety;

(C) disease; or

(D) other sanitary or phytosanitary concerns; or

(2) developing protocols as part of bilateral negotiations with other countries on issues such as animal health, grain quality, and genetically modified commodities.

#### (c) Eligible programs

Depending on need, as determined by the Secretary, activities authorized under this section may be carried out through—

(1) this section;

(2) the emerging markets program under section 1542 1 and section 5623(d) of this title; or

(3) the Cochran Fellowship Program under section 3293 of this title.

#### (d) Funding

There is authorized to be appropriated $2,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2019 through 2023.

(Pub. L. 101–624, title XV, §1543A, as added Pub. L. 107–171, title III, §3204, May 13, 2002, 116 Stat. 300; amended Pub. L. 115–334, title III, §§3201(b)(3)(C), 3301, Dec. 20, 2018, 132 Stat. 4617.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 1542, referred to in subsec. (c)(2), is section 1542 of title XV of Pub. L. 101–624, which is set out as a note under section 5622 of this title.

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Food, Agriculture, Conservation, and Trade Act of 1990, and not as part of the Agricultural Trade Act of 1978 which comprises this chapter.

#### Amendments

2018—Subsec. (b)(1)(A). Pub. L. 115–334, §3301(1), inserted "or new agricultural production technologies" after "biotechnology".

Subsec. (c)(2). Pub. L. 115–334, §3201(b)(3)(C), inserted "and section 5623(d) of this title" after "section 1542".

Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 115–334, §3301(2), substituted "$2,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2019 through 2023" for "$6,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2002 through 2007".

1 See References in Text note below.
AGREEMENT
      REGARDING THE ADVANCES AND LOANS

    


    BY
      ALBERT
      BEERLI FOR THE XL TURF PROJECT

    


    The
      undersigned, Alain Lemieux and Albert Beerli, hereby make the following
      statement:

    


    	1.  	
            Alain
              Lemieux accepts and recognizes that the amount of CHF 108,000 is owed
              to
              Albert Beerli for the advances made to the project XL TURF during the
              calendar year 2003. This amount of CHF 108,000 includes an amount of
              CHF
              55,000 that has already been addressed and treated in a separate document
              dated November 2003.

          


    


    	2.  	
            Alain
              Lemieux accepts and recognizes that an additional amount of CHF 45,000
              is
              owed to Albert Beerli for the advances made to the project XL TURF
              for the
              period beginning January 1, 2004 and ending March 11,
              2004.

          


    


    	3.  	
            Alain
              Lemieux as the representative of the holders of 90% of the shares of
              the
              capital of XL GENERATION AG undertakes that XL GENERATION AG will honor
              and pay the amount of 153,000 CHF at a date where the cash flow of
              XL
              GENERATION AG will be in a position to pay that amount without any
              adverse
              effect on the financial situation of XL GENERATION AG for its day to
              day
              operation and business.

          


    


    	4.  	
            The
              loan Agreement regarding the amount of 55,000 CHF dated November, 2003
              is
              hereby cancelled and replaced by the present
              agreement.

          


    


    	5.  	
            If
              for any reason, XL GENERATION AG, is closed or otherwise not used in
              the
              project XL TURF, Alain Lemieux undertakes that any other company used
              in
              the project XL TURF will undertake to be bound by covenant and obligations
              provided in this agreement.

          


    


    


    


    
      	/s/ Alain Lemieux	 	
              /s/
                Albert Beerli

            
	
              
                
Alain
                Lemieux

            	 	
              
                
Albert
                Beerli

            
	November 25, 2004	 	
              November
                25,
                2004
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

LINE CONSTRUCTION BENEFIT FUND, ) 

A HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND, )

) 

Plaintiff, ) 1:12-CV-1731

) 

v. ) Judge Der-Yeghiayan

) 

MMC DIRECTIONAL BORING, ) Magistrate Judge Cole

)

Defendant. )

MOTION TO VACATE ORDER OF DISMISSAL, TO REINSTATE ACTION, 

AND FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT

NOW COME the Plaintiffs and moves this Honorable Court to vacate Order of

Dismissal entered on May 10, 2012, a copy of which is attached hereto as Plaintiffs' Exhibit

"A", and to reinstate Plaintiffs' cause of action instanter, and for entry ofjudgment against

the Defendant. 

In support of Plaintiffs' Motion, Plaintiffs state as follows:

1) That pursuant to Settlement Agreement and Agreed Order of Dismissal,

executed by the parties andfiled with the Court on 4/30/2012, a copy of which is attached

hereto as Plaintiffs’ Exhibit “B”, the parties agreed to a dismissal of the pending action.

2) That notwithstanding the provisions of the Settlement Agreement,

specifically paragraph1 thereof, the Defendant has failedtoremitpayments forthemonths

of November 2012, through February 2013, and current contributions for 2012, in the

amount of $8,530.00. See Administrator’s Affidavit attached.
WHEREFORE, inaccordance withtheprovisions ofthe Agreed OrderofDismissal,

Exhibit “A”, Plaintiffs pray that the Order of Dismissal be vacated instanter, Plaintiffs’

cause of action be reinstated, and that judgment enterin favor of Plaintiffs and against the

Defendant in the amount of $49,266.84, as and for the outstanding delinquencies and

accrued interest calculated pursuant to the Settlement Agreement, and the amount of the

current delinquencies claimed due.

/s/ Robert B. Greenberg 

Asher, Gittler & D'Alba, Ltd.

200 West Jackson Boulevard, Suite 1900

Chicago, Illinois 60606 

(312) 263-1500 

Fax: (312) 263-1520

rbg@ulaw.com

IL ARDC#: 01047558 

Dated: March 4, 2013
Language for Flex Dollars from Jason Lorgan and Alyssa Dobson

The rationale for the language changes below is twofold. First, counting swipes will be problematic should 

we include anything other than flex dollars which equate to a real dollar value. Secondly, in talking with 

others in my area of representation as well as business offices, we need to put a de minimus amount in 

place for returning funds. Without that threshold, institutions would be chasing refunds of cents, and the 

burden would become unrealistic. 

New language is highlighted.

(c) Crediting a student's ledger account. 

(1) An institution may credit a student's ledger account with title IV, HEA program funds to pay for allowable 

charges associated with the current payment period. Allowable charges are—

(i) The amount of tuition, fees, and institutionally provided room and board assessed the student for the 

payment period or as provided in paragraph (c)(5) of this section, the prorated amount of those charges if 

the institution debits the student’s ledger account for more than the charges associated with the payment 

period. Any title IV, HEA program funds allocated for meal plans must be fully utilized for the benefit of the 

respective students. No institution may retain unused flex dollars, or other similarly structured cash value,

meal plan funds exceeding ten dollars that were paid for with title IV, HEA program funds, and any remaining 

balance at the end of the payment period academic year must be returned to the student as soon as 

possible but no later than 14 days after the end of the final payment period;