alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Flava Works, Inc., )

)

Plaintiff, ) Case No. 1:12-cv-01886

)

)

v. )

)

Gregory Nance, )

)

Defendant. )

MEANITH HUON’S AND THE HUON LAW FIRM’S MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS 

COUNSEL OF RECORD

Meanith Huon and The Huon Law Firm, move to withdraw as attorney of record for 

Plaintiff, Flava Works, Inc. In support of the motion, Meanith Huon and The Huon Law Firm 

state as follows:

1. Illinois Supreme Court Rule 1.16 provides as follows:

(a) Except as stated in paragraph (c), a lawyer shall not represent a client or, where 

representation has commenced, shall withdraw from the representation of a client if:

(1) the representation will result in violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct or other 

law;

* * *

(3) the lawyer is discharged.

* * *

(b) Except as stated in paragraph (c), a lawyer may withdraw from representing a client if:

(1) withdrawal can be accomplished without material adverse effect on the interests of the 

client;

* * *

(4) the client insists upon taking action that the lawyer considers repugnant or with which 

the lawyer has a fundamental disagreement;

(5) the client fails substantially to fulfill an obligation to the lawyer regarding the lawyer's 

Case: 1:12-cv-01886 Document #: 29 Filed: 01/03/14 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:240
services and has been given reasonable warning that the lawyer will withdraw unless the 

obligation is fulfilled;

(6) the representation will result in an unreasonable financial burden on the lawyer or has 

been rendered unreasonably difficult by the client; or 

(7) other good cause for withdrawal exists.

2. In this case, the representation will result in an unreasonable financial burden on 

the lawyer and other good cause for withdrawal exists.

WHEREFORE, Meanith Huon and The Huon Law Firm, respectfully request that this 

Honorable Court grant him leave to withdraw as counsel of record for Plaintiff, Flava Works, Inc. 

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Meanith Huon

Meanith Huon

PO Box 441

Chicago, Illinois 60690

Phone: (312) 405-2789

E-mail: huon.meanith@gmail.com

IL ARDC. No.: 6230996

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Under penalties of law, I attest the following documents or items have been or are being 

electronically served on all counsel of record on or before January 3, 2014

MEANITH HUON’S AND THE HUON LAW FIRM’S MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS 

COUNSEL OF RECORD

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Meanith Huon

Meanith Huon

PO Box 441

Chicago, Illinois 60690

Phone: (312) 405-2789

E-mail: huon.meanith@gmail.com

IL ARDC. No.: 6230996

Case: 1:12-cv-01886 Document #: 29 Filed: 01/03/14 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:241
<PAGE>

                                                                     Exhibit 4.1

[LOGO]
NUMBER
SHARES
SC-
INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
CUSIP  868587 10 6
SEE REVERSE FOR CERTAIN DEFINITIONS
THIS CERTIFIES THAT
SUPPORT.COM
is the record holder of
FULLY PAID AND NONASSESSABLE  SHARES OF COMMON STOCK, $.0001 PAR VALUE OF
SUPPORT.COM, INC.
transferable on the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof in person or
by duly authorized Attorney upon surrender of this certificate properly
endorsed. This certificate is not valid until countersigned by the Transfer
Agent and Registrar.
WITNESS the facsimile seal of the Corporation and the facsimile signatures of
its duly authorized officers.
Dated:
[Brian Beattie]
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
[SEAL]
[Radha Basu]
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRESIDENT
COUNTERSIGNED AND REGISTERED:
AMERICAN SECURITIES TRANSFER & TRUST, INC.
P.O. BOX 1596
DENVER, CO  80201
TRANSFER AGENT
AND REGISTRAR
BY
AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE
<PAGE>

SUPPORT.COM, INC.
A statement of all of the powers, designations, preferences and relative,
participating, optional, or other special rights of each class of stock or
series thereof and the qualifications, limitations or restrictions of such
preferences and/or rights as established by the Certificate of Incorporation, as
amended, may be obtained by any stockholder upon request and without charge from
the principal office of the Corporation.
The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this
certificate, shall be construed as though they were written out in full
according to applicable laws or regulations:
TEN COM- as tenants in common
TEN ENT- as tenants by the entireties
JT TEN- as joint tenants with right
of survivorship and not as
tenants in common
UNIF GIFT MIN ACT- _____ Custodian _____
(Cust)  (Minor)
under Uniform Gifts to Minors
Act _____
(State)
UNIF TRF MIN ACT- _____ Custodian (until age _____ )
(Cust)
_____ under Uniform Transfers
(Minor)
to Minors Act _____
(State)
Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list.
ASSIGNMENT
For Value Received _____ hereby sell(s), assign(s) and transfer(s) unto
PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY SECURITY OR OTHER
IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE
(PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS, INCLUDING ZIP CODE OF ASSIGNEE(S)
of the Shares of capital stock represented by the within Certificate and do(es)
hereby irrevocably constitute and
appoint _____ Attorney
to transfer the said Shares on the books of the within named Corporation with
full power of substitution in the premises.
Dated
NOTE: The signature to this assignment must correspond with
the names as written upon the face of the certificate in every
particular, without alteration or enlargement or any change whatever.
Signature must be guaranteed.
Signature(s) Guaranteed:
By
THE SIGNATURES MUST BE GUARANTEED BY AN ELIGIBLE GUARANTOR INSTITUTION (BANKS,
STOCKBROKERS, SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATIONS AND CREDIT UNIONS WITH MEMBERSHIP IN
AN APPROVED SIGNATURE GUARANTEE MEDALLION PROGRAM) PURSUANT TO S.E.C. RULE 17Ad-
15.
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

**For more on the latest information on accreditation released by the Department, please click here.**

State Liaison

----

  10 | 11 | 12TOC

 Printable view

## How Do I Find...

          - Student loans, forgiveness
          - Higher Education Rulemaking
          - College accreditation
          - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
          - FERPA
          - FAFSA
          - 1098, tax forms

More >

## Information About...

          - Elevating Teaching
          - Early Learning
          - Engage Every Student
          - Unlocking Career Success
          - Cybersecurity

 

----

*Our mission*

Student Loans
Repaying LoansDefaulted LoansLoan ForgivenessLoan Servicers

Grants & Programs
Apply for Pell GrantsGrants ForecastApply for a Grant

Laws & Guidance
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)FERPACivil RightsNew IDEA Website

Data & Research
Education StatisticsPostsecondary Education DataED Data ExpressNation's Report CardWhat Works ClearinghouseOpen Data PlatformCOVID Relief Data

About Us
Contact UsED OfficesJobsPress ReleasesFAQsRecursos en españolBudget, PerformancePrivacy Program

----

          - Notices
          - FOIA
          - Privacy Policy
          - Accessibility
          - Security
          - Information quality
          - Inspector General
          - Whitehouse.gov
          - USA.gov
          - Benefits.gov
          - Regulations.gov
          - vote.gov
**Exhibit99.1**

Certificate of Chief Executive Officer and ChiefFinancial Officer

The undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes - Oxley Act of2002, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December31, 2001, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information containedin such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of BancTec, Inc. as of, andfor, the periods presented in such report.

Very truly yours,

 

/s/Craig D. Crisman
| Craig D. Crisman  President and Chief Executive Officer |
|---------------------------------------------------------|

 

/s/Brian R. Stone
| Brian R. Stone  Chief Financial Officer |
|-----------------------------------------|
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



### January 4, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice


### 132335 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan 

### PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices



### v SC: 132335 COA: 269359 Wayne CC: 03-006732-01 ROOSEVELT CHRISTIAN, III, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 11, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishi ng entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).

p1218 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

January 4, 2007

Clerk
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Dynamic Materials Corporation (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, YvonPierre Cariou, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifypursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

 

(i)                  The Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(ii)               The information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   | April 29, 2010                    |   |
|--------|----------------------------------------|--------|
|   |                                   |   |
|   |                                   |   |
|   | /s/  Yvon Pierre Cariou                |   |
|   | Yvon  Pierre Cariou                    |   |
|   | President and Chief  Executive Officer |   |
|   | of Dynamic Materials  Corporation      |   |

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to Dynamic Materials Corporation and will be retained by DynamicMaterials Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.

 

----

 

** **

** **
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS

NO. 22-4543

JOHN F. JOE, APPELLANT,

V.

DENIS MCDONOUGH,

SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, APPELLEE.

Before PIETSCH, GREENBERG, and JAQUITH, Judges.

O R D E R

On March 14, 2023, the Court stayed this case and canceled oral argument, previously 

scheduled for March 23, 2023. On March 21, 2023, Mr. Joe filed a motion to dismiss the case.

Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is 

ORDERED that the stay in this matter is lifted. It is further

ORDERED that Mr. Joe's motion to dismiss the case is granted. It is further

ORDERED that this appeal is DISMISSED. 

DATED: June 14, 2023 PER CURIAM.

Copies to:

Harold H. Hoffman III

VA General Counsel (027)
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB (the "Report") of Colorado Wyoming Reserve Company (the "Company") for the year ended June 30, 2002, I, Rafiq A. Sayed, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of the undersigned's knowledge and belief:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date:  June 29, 2005

/s/ Rafiq A. Sayed



Rafiq A. Sayed



Chief Financial Officer
#### 2001.403 Individual deviations.

In individual cases, deviations from either the FAR or the NRCAR will be authorized only when essential to effect only one contracting action or where special circumstances make the deviations clearly in the best interest of the Government. Individual deviations must be authorized in advance by the Director, Division of Contracts and Property Management.
Team I—Program Integrity Issues 

January 25, 2010 

Federal Negotiators 

U.S. Department of 

Education 

Carney McCullough Fred Sellers

Non-Federal Negotiators 

Community of Interest Primary Alternate 

Students Rich Williams 

U.S. PIRG

Angela Peoples 

United States Student Association

Consumer Advocacy 

Organizations 

Margaret Reiter 

Attorney

Deanne Loonin 

National Consumer Law Center

2-year Public Institutions Richard Heath 

Anne Arundel Community College 

Joan Zanders 

Northern Virginia Community College 

4-year Public Institutions Phil Asbury 

Univ. of North Carolina - Chapel Hill 

Joe Pettibon 

Texas A & M University 

Private, Nonprofit 

Institutions 

Todd Jones 

Association of Independent Colleges and 

Universities of Ohio 

Maureen Budetti 

National Association of Independent 

Colleges and Universities 

Private, For-Profit 

Institutions 

Elaine Neely 

Kaplan Higher Education Corp. 

David Rhodes 

School of Visual Arts 

College Presidents Terry Hartle 

ACE 

Bob Moran 

American Association of State Colleges 

and Universities 

Admissions Officers David Hawkins 

National Association for College 

Admission Counseling 

Amanda Modar 

National Association for College 

Admission Counseling 

Business Officers Susan Williams 

Bridgeport University 

Anne Gross 

National Association of College and 

University Business Officers 

Financial Aid 

Administrators 

Val Meyers 

Michigan State University 

Joan Berkes 

National Association of Student Financial 

Aid Administrators 

Regional/Programmatic 

Accreditors 

Barbara Brittingham 

Commission on Institutions of Higher 

Education of the New England 

Association of Schools and Colleges 

Sharon Tanner (1st Alternate) 

National League for Nursing Accrediting 

Commission 

Ralph Wolf (2nd Alternate) 

Western Association of Schools and 

Colleges 

National Accreditors Anthony Mirando 

National Accrediting Commission of 

Cosmetology Arts and Sciences 

Michale McComis 

Accrediting Commission of Career 

Schools and Colleges 

Work Force Development Jim Simpson 

Florida State College 

Susan Lehr 

Florida State College 

Lending Community 

Representative 

Carol Lindsey 

Texas Guaranteed Student Loan Corp 

Janet Dodson 

National Student Loan Program 

Test Publishers Chris Young 

Wonderlic, Inc. 

Dr. David Waldschmidt 

Wonderlic, Inc. 

State Higher Education 

Officials 

Dr. Marshall Hill 

Nebraska Coordinating Commission for 

Postsecondary Education 

Dr. Kathryn Dodge 

New Hampshire Postsecondary Education 

Commission 

Facilitators 

CDS2 Chip Cameron Craig Bagemihl 

**
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03
- 15
- 00185
- CV

A. R., Appellant

v. Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Appellee

FROM THE 126TH D ISTRICT COURT OF TRA VIS COUNTY

NO. D
- 1
- FM
- 13
- 005220 THE HONORABLE LORA J . LIVINGS TON, JUDGE PRESIDING

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

The reporter’s record in this appeal was originally due to be filed on April 3,
2015. To date, the reporter’s record has not been filed , nor has LaSonya Thomas responded to our recent attempts to communicate with her about this cause

.

Accordingly, Ms. Thomas is hereby ordered to file the reporter’s record in this
case on or before May 4 , 2015

. See Tex. R. App. P. 28.4(b)(2) (cumulative extensions o f time for filing of reporter ’ s record in termination case m ay no t exceed 30 days); id. R. 35.3(c) (in accelerated appeal, extensions of time to file reporter’s record limited to 10 days). If the record is not filed by that date, Thomas may be required to show cause why she should not be held in contempt of court.

It is ordered on April 27, 2015

.

Before Justices Puryear, Pemberton and Bourland
16-2322 

Anderson v. Rehmer

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT

SUMMARY ORDER

RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY 

ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF 

APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT=S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER 

IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN 

ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION ASUMMARY ORDER@). A PARTY CITING TO A SUMMARY 

ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY PARTY NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL. 

 At a stated term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, 

held at the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, in the City of 

New York, on the 25th day of August, two thousand seventeen. 

PRESENT: 

JON O. NEWMAN,

PIERRE N. LEVAL, 

ROSEMARY S. POOLER,

Circuit Judges. 

_____________________________________ 

Francis Anderson, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v. 16-2322 

Patricia Rehmer, Suing in her official 

capacity, Helene Vartelas, Suing in her official 

capacity, Scott Semple, Suing in his official 

capacity, Anne Cournoyer, Suing in her official 

capacity, 

Defendants-Appellees. 

_____________________________________ 

FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT: Francis Anderson, 

pro se, Newtown, CT. 
2 

FOR DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES: Jacqueline S. Hoell, Stephen R. Strom, 

Assistant Attorneys General, for George 

Jepsen, Attorney General of the State of 

Connecticut, Hartford, CT. 

Appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut 

(Bolden, J.). 

UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND 

DECREED that the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. 

Appellant Francis Anderson is currently serving a sentence in a Connecticut prison. He has 

previously been confined in a Connecticut psychiatric facility and has filed numerous lawsuits. 

Proceeding pro se, Anderson appeals the district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. ' 1983 

complaint because the district court concluded that the only relief sought, a preliminary injunction 

(sought in the complaint and in a series of motions), had previously been denied. An appeal from 

the denial of those motions was affirmed. See Anderson v. Rehmer, No. 15-3569 (2d Cir. Dec. 23, 

2015). We assume the parties= familiarity with the underlying facts, the procedural history of the 

case, and the issues on appeal. 

We review sua sponte dismissals de novo. See Giano v. Goord, 250 F.3d 146, 149-50 (2d 

Cir. 2001). 

Anderson’s transfer to a new facility prevents him from seeking either injunctive or 

declaratory relief against officials of his prior facility. See Shepherd v. Goord, 662 F.3d 603, 610 

(2d Cir. 2011). 

Accordingly, we AFFIRM the judgment of the district court. 

FOR THE COURT: 

Catherine O’Hagan Wolfe, Clerk
#### 1852.219-80 Limitation on subcontracting—SBIR Phase I program.

As prescribed in 1819.7302(a), insert the following clause:

# Limitation on Subcontracting—SBIR Phase I Program (OCT 2006)

The Contractor shall perform a minimum of two-thirds of the research and/or analytical effort (total contract price less profit) conducted under this contract. Any deviation from this requirement must be approved in advance and in writing by the Contracting Officer.

(End of clause)

[71 FR 61688, Oct. 19, 2006]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1994
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                           8,547
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   66,677
<ALLOWANCES>                                    18,623
<INVENTORY>                                        601
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 4,520
<PP&E>                                           2,126
<DEPRECIATION>                                     820
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  49,922
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           75,557
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                           117
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          4
<OTHER-SE>                                    (25,756)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    49,922
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                13,472
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,152
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               (3,128)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (11,205)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (20,134)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (20,134)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### 1422.804-2 Construction.

Bureau contracting offices are responsible for maintaining (including updates and revisions) lists of geographic areas subject to affirmative action requirements.
### §1251. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 1251, act June 27, 1952, ch. 477, title II, ch. 5, §241, 66 Stat. 204, as amended, which related to deportable aliens, was renumbered section 237 of ch. 4 of title II of act June 27, 1952, by Pub. L. 104–208, div. C, title III, §305(a)(2), Sept. 30, 1996, 110 Stat. 3009–598, and was transferred to section 1227 of this title.
July 28 , 2015

H eurobotics Corporation

1585 Aviation Center Parkway

Suite 600

Daytona Beach, FL 32114

Dear Heurobotics Corp :

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It

explains why we cannot process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can n o t Process Your Request

We entered your April 29

, 2015 exemption request on behalf of Heurobotics Corporation into

the public docket (No. FAA

- 20 15

- 1686 ) , but we are unable to process your request any

further. The information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy

enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would

benefit the public as a whole.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

W hat You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do No t Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267

- 4264

.

Sincerely,

/s/

B rittany Newton

Program Analyst

, Aircraft and

Airport Rules Division

Enclosure