alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### 204.7001 Procedures.

Follow the procedures at PGI 204.7001 for reporting procurement acquisition lead time milestones in the Procurement Integrated Enterprise Environment module.
#### Joel Picus, an Infant, by His Guardian ad Litem, et al. v. Josephine Briglia.

— -Motion to dismiss appeal granted, with $10 costs, unless the appellants procure the record on appeal and appellants’ points to be served and filed on or before August 25, 1960, with notice of argument for September 6, 1960, said appeal to be argued or submitted when reached. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, McNally, Stevens and Noonan, JJ.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of AXCESS Inc. (the “***Company***”) on Form10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2003, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “***Report***”), I, Allan L.Frank, Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and PrincipalAccounting and Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002, that to my knowledge:

 

(1)                                  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as applicable; and

 

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the datesand for the periods indicated.

 

 
| /S/ ALLAN L. FRANK                                                                                 |   |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Allan L. Frank                                                                                     |
| Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Principal  Accounting and Financial Officer |
|                                                                                               |
| Dated:  March 30, 2004                                                                   |

 

----
#### Thompson *v.*The State.

March 11, 1913.

Atkinson, J.

1. When this ease was before the Supreme Court on a former occasion, it was ruled: “Where one convicted of murder has made a motion for a new trial, and the same is set for hearing in a county other than that in which the trial was had, and the defendant offers and the court allows an amendment to the motion, setting up that certain witnesses residing in the county in which the case was tried know facts which are material to his case and refuse to testify thereto voluntarily by affidavit or otherwise, and that such testimony is newly discovered, all of which is supported by proper affidavits, it is error for the court to refuse to grant the motion of the defendant, contained in such amendment, that the court continue the hearing and afford him its aid in procuring the desired testimony. Civil Code §§ 5918 and 5919 do not apply to the case above outlined.” *Thompson*v. *State,*138 *Ga.*267 (75 S. E. 357). *Held,*that the ruling so' announced is not to be construed as restricting the court, on the further hearing of the motion for new trial, to consideration of the alleged newly discovered evidence.

*(a)*On the second hearing of the motion for new trial, when the affidavits of the witnesses as to ’the matter relied upon as newly discovered evidence were introduced, it was competent on a counter-showing to admit evidence tending to impeach the witnesses.

2. The alleged newly discovered evidence tended to controvert the evidence introduced by the State on the main trial, but it was not • of such character as, when considered in connection with the evidence offered to impeach the witnesses, would likely produce a different result if a new trial were granted.

3. The evidence was sufficient to support the verdict.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Bech, J., absent. The other Justices concur.*

*593Indictment for murder. Before Judge Rawlings. Jefferson superior court. November 14, 1912.

*A. R. Wright,*for plaintiff in error.

*T. 8. Felder, attorney-general, R. Lee Moore, solicitor-general, Alfred Herrington,*and *R. N. Hardeman,*contra.
#### 1852.245-82 Occupancy management requirements.

As prescribed in 1845.107-70(m), insert the following clause:

# Occupancy Management Requirements (SEP 2017)

(a) In addition to the requirements of the clause at FAR 52.245-1, Government Property, as included in this contract, the Contractor shall comply with the following in performance of work in and around Government real property:

(1) NPD 8800.14, Policy for Real Estate Management.

(2) NPD 8831.2, Facilities Maintenance and Operations Management.

[Insert any additional Center occupancy requirements here]

(b) The Contractor shall obtain the written approval of the Contracting Officer before installing or removing Contractor-owned property onto or into any Government real property or when movement of Contractor-owned property may damage or destroy Government-owned property. The Contractor shall restore damaged property to its original condition at the Contractor's expense.

(c) The Contractor shall not acquire, construct or install any fixed improvement or structural alterations in Government buildings or other real property without the advance, written approval of the Contracting Officer. Fixed improvement or structural alterations, as used herein, means any alteration or improvement in the nature of the building or other real property that, after completion, cannot be removed without substantial loss of value or damage to the premises. Title to such property shall vest in the Government.

(d) The Contractor shall report any real property or any portion thereof when it is no longer required for performance under the contract, as directed by the Contracting Officer.

(End of clause)

[76 FR 2006, Jan. 12, 2011, as amended at 81 FR 24501, Apr. 26, 2016; 82 FR 38853, Aug. 16, 2017]
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 14 (Monday, January 25, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 6891]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-01486]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Dental & Craniofacial Research; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: NIDCR Special Grants Review Committee.
    Date: February 18-19, 2021.
    Time: 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research, 
National Institutes of Health, 6701 Democracy Boulevard, Room 666, 
Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Latarsha J. Carithers, Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Branch, National Institute of Dental and 
Craniofacial Research, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Democracy 
Boulevard, Room 666, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-594-4859, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b0dcd1c4d1c2c3d8d19ed3d1c2d9c4d8d5c2c3f0ded9d89ed7dfc6"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a2cec3d6c3d0d1cac38cc1c3d0cbd6cac7d0d1e2cccbca8cc5cdd4">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.121, Oral 
Diseases and Disorders Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 19, 2021.
Melanie J. Pantoja,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2021-01486 Filed 1-22-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              NOV-28-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAY-30-1998
<CASH>                                               1,778
<SECURITIES>                                        48,701
<RECEIVABLES>                                       33,122
<ALLOWANCES>                                         1,100
<INVENTORY>                                         35,434
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   119,819
<PP&E>                                             125,191
<DEPRECIATION>                                      85,735
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     163,327
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               18,081
<BONDS>                                                521
<COMMON>                                             1,318
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<OTHER-SE>                                         136,154
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       163,327
<SALES>                                             74,012
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    74,012
<CGS>                                               63,321
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       63,321
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     7,400
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       200
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      45
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      5,939
<INCOME-TAX>                                         1,870
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  4,069
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                         4,069
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          .72
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          .71
        


</TABLE>
BARBARA TINDLE,

Appellant,

v.

DONNIE CHILDREE,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D14-2977

_____________________________/

Opinion filed February 24, 2015.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Bay County.

James B. Fensom, Judge.

Joseph Silva, Jr. and William H. McLean of Silva Law Group, P.A., Panama City, 

for Appellant.

Roland W. Kiehn and Jeffrey S. Carter of Barron & Redding, P.A., Panama City, for 

Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROBERTS, CLARK, and ROWE, JJ., CONCUR.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Venture Catalyst Incorporated (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the year ending June 30, 2005 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Greg Shay, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:



1.    The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
result of operations of the Company.



By:

/S/    GREG
SHAYGreg Shay Chief Executive Officer, President and Chief Operating Officer




Dated: September 23, 2005
#### 1513.170-1 Contents of sole source justifications.

The program office submitting the procurement request must submit, as a separate attachment, a brief written statement in support of sole source acquisitions exceeding the micro-purchase threshold. The statement must cite one or more of the circumstances in FAR 6.302 and the necessary facts to support each circumstance. Although program offices may not cite the authority in FAR 6.302-7, the public interest may be used as a basis to support a sole source acquisition. If the acquisition has been synopsized as a notice of proposed sole source acquisition, the statement must include the results of the evaluation of responses to the synopsis.
### §1285. Employment on passenger vessels of aliens afflicted with certain disabilities

It shall be unlawful for any vessel or aircraft carrying passengers between a port of the United States and a port outside thereof to have employed on board upon arrival in the United States any alien afflicted with feeble-mindedness, insanity, epilepsy, tuberculosis in any form, leprosy, or any dangerous contagious disease. If it appears to the satisfaction of the Attorney General, from an examination made by a medical officer of the United States Public Health Service, and is so certified by such officer, that any such alien was so afflicted at the time he was shipped or engaged and taken on board such vessel or aircraft and that the existence of such affliction might have been detected by means of a competent medical examination at such time, the owner, commanding officer, agent, consignee, or master thereof shall pay for each alien so afflicted to the Commissioner the sum of $1,000. No vessel or aircraft shall be granted clearance pending the determination of the question of the liability to the payment of such sums, or while such sums remain unpaid, except that clearance may be granted prior to the determination of such question upon the deposit of an amount sufficient to cover such sums or of a bond approved by the Commissioner with sufficient surety to secure the payment thereof. Any such fine may, in the discretion of the Attorney General, be mitigated or remitted.

(June 27, 1952, ch. 477, title II, ch. 6, §255, 66 Stat. 222; Pub. L. 101–649, title V, §543(a)(5), Nov. 29, 1990, 104 Stat. 5058.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1990—Pub. L. 101–649 substituted "Commissioner the sum of $1,000" for "collector of customs of the customs district in which the port of arrival is located the sum of $50" in second sentence, and "Commissioner" for "collector of customs" in third sentence.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1990 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 101–649 applicable to actions taken after Nov. 29, 1990, see section 543(c) of Pub. L. 101–649, set out as a note under section 1221 of this title.

#### Abolition of Immigration and Naturalization Service and Transfer of Functions

For abolition of Immigration and Naturalization Service, transfer of functions, and treatment of related references, see note set out under section 1551 of this title.
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 30 (Friday, February 13, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 8058]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-03148]

[[Page 8058]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

BROADCASTING BOARD OF GOVERNORS

Sunshine Act Meeting Notice

DATE AND TIME: Wednesday, February 18, 2015, 9:00 a.m.-11:30 a.m. EST.

PLACE:  Cohen Building, Room 3321, 330 Independence Ave. SW., 
Washington, DC 20237.

SUBJECT: Notice of Meeting of the Broadcasting Board of Governors.

SUMMARY: The Broadcasting Board of Governors (Board) will be meeting at 
the time and location listed above. The Board will vote on a consent 
agenda consisting of the minutes of its December 18, 2014 meeting, a 
resolution honoring Michael Meehan for his service on the Board, and a 
resolution on revised BBG meeting dates in 2015. The Board will also 
receive a review of the Voice of America.
    This meeting will be available for public observation via streamed 
webcast, both live and on-demand, on the agency's public Web site at 
www.bbg.gov. Information regarding this meeting, including any updates 
or adjustments to its starting time, can also be found on the agency's 
public Web site.
    The public may also attend this meeting in person at the address 
listed above as seating capacity permits. Members of the public seeking 
to attend the meeting in person must register at http://bbgboardmeetingfebruary2015.eventbrite.com by 12:00 p.m. (EST) on 
February 17. For more information, please contact BBG Public Affairs at 
(202) 203-4400 or by email at pubaff@bbg.gov.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Persons interested in obtaining 
more information should contact Oanh Tran at (202) 203-4545.

Oanh Tran,
Director of Board Operations.
[FR Doc. 2015-03148 Filed 2-11-15; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 8610-01-P
```
#### In the Matter of George Beatty, Respondent, v. Commission of Investigation of the State of New York, Appellant.

Appeal from an order of a Special Term of the Supreme Court, Albany County. The prior taking of petitioner’s books and records, considered heretofore in our decisions of March 13 and May 15, 1962, does not alone invalidate a later lawful subpoena calling for production of the same records, whether or not either the original taking or the subsequent retention after demand for their return was illegal. Residual issues that may appear in the actual examination presenting broader questions relating to the petitioner’s rights are not reached in this proceeding addressed to the subprona. The subpoena is technically valid on its face and this record does not demonstrate a sufficient showing of oppression or undue hardship to the petitioner to require judicial interference. Order reversed, on the law and the facts, and petition dismissed, without costs. Bergan, P. J., Cooil, Gibson, Herlihy and Reynolds, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>
<PAGE>
                                                           EXHIBIT 10(h)
GOLDEN AMERICAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
                            SURPLUS NOTE

Golden American Life Insurance Company agrees to pay Equitable of
Iowa Companies, an Iowa corporation, the sum of $25 million
($25,000,000.00) plus interest at the rate of 8.25%  per annum from
the date hereof, December 17, 1996 until paid.  In any event, this
note will mature on December 17, 2026.

This Surplus Note and accrued interest thereon shall be subordinate
to payments due to policyholders, claimant and beneficiary claims, as
well as debts owed to all other classes of debtors of Golden American
Life Insurance Company in the event of (a) the institution of
bankruptcy, reorganization, insolvency or liquidation proceedings by
or against Golden American Life Insurance Company, or (b) the
appointment of a Trustee, receiver or other Conservator for a
substantial part of Golden American Life Insurance Company
properties.

Any payments made shall first apply to accrued interest, and the
balance of such payment shall apply to reduce the principal of this
Note.

Any payment of principal and/or interest made shall be subject to the
prior approval of the Delaware Insurance Commissioner.  If the
Commissioner has not approved payment of principal to retire the note
prior to its maturity date, the maturity date will be automatically
extended until such time as the Commissioner authorizes payment of
the final balance of principal.

Golden American Life Insurance Company hereby waives presentment and
notice of dishonor.

In witness whereof, Golden American Life Insurance Company has caused
this Note to be executed and delivered.


                                GOLDEN AMERICAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

                                By:  /s/ Terry L. Kendall
                                     ---------------------------------
                                     Terry L. Kendall, President and CEO


Attest by:


/s/ Myles R. Tashman
------------------------------
Myles R. Tashman
Executive Vice President and
General Counsel

<PAGE>
<PAGE>
#### R. F. Erhardt & Sons, Respondent, v. Joseph M. Bucko et al., Appellants.

In an action to foreclose a mechanic’s lien on real property, defendants appeal from a judgment of the County Court, Putnam County, dated November 23, 1959 and entered December 1, 1959, after a nonjury trial, in favor of plaintiff, fixing its lien at $1,389.79 and directing foreclosure of the lien and the sale of the property. Judgment reversed on the law, without costs, and the action remitted to the trial court for further proceedings not inconsistent herewith. Neither the decision nor the judgment entered thereon makes any disposition of defendants’ counterclaim. Under the circumstances, it should be remitted to the trial court for a further decision, for a statement of the facts essential to dispose of the issues raised by the counterclaim and reply, and for the entry of an appropriate judgment consistent with the facts found (cf. *Pinsker*v. *Pinsker,*44 App. Div. 501; *Cable Flax Mills*v. *Early,*72 App. Div. 213; *La Grange*v. *Merritt,*88 App. Div. 279). Defendants’ contention that they were deprived of a fair trial by reason of bias of the County Judge is wholly without merit or justification. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Kleinfeld, Christ and Pette, JJ., concur.
#### 209.406 Debarment.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 10.9


November 27, 2000

John D. Staedke


Dear John:

The purpose of this letter is to amend the terms of your employment offer letter
dated November 18, 1999 ("Offer Letter") with respect to the vesting of stock
options granted to you for the purchase of Common Stock of BancTec, Inc.

The paragraph entitled "Vesting" is amended and replaced by the following:

"Vesting:
--------

100,000 options will vest effective July 1, 2000.

300,000 options will vest at the rate of 25% per year over a four year period
beginning January 1, 2001 in accordance with the terms of the BancTec, Inc. 2000
Stock Plan and your stock option agreement: 50% will vest based upon the lapse
of time and 50% will vest based upon the company's performance. Any accelerated
vesting of options which been or in the future are generally granted to other
optionees will also apply to your options."

All other terms of the Offer Letter shall remain in full force and effect.

Please sign this letter below acknowledging your agreement regarding the above
amendment.

Sincerely,

/s/Robert A. Minicucci
                                                       /s/John D. Staedke
                                                       -----------------------
Robert A. Minicucci                                           John D. Staedke
Chairman of the Board of Directors
### §7995. Assignment of payments

The provisions of section 590h(g) of title 16, relating to assignment of payments, shall apply to payments made under the authority of this Act. The producer making the assignment, or the assignee, shall provide the Secretary with notice, in such manner as the Secretary may require, of any assignment made under this section.

(Pub. L. 107–171, title I, §1612, May 13, 2002, 116 Stat. 219.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This Act, referred to in text, is Pub. L. 107–171, May 13, 2002, 116 Stat. 134, known as the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 7901 of this title and Tables.