alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Thomas A. Mace et al., Appellants, v. State of New York, Respondent.

(Claim No. 30744.)

Claimant Bernadine E. Mace was a tenant in a housing project maintained by the State of New York, and on January 7, 1950 fell in front of the premises she occupied. She testified that when starting to cross the street in front of her apartment she stepped in a hole and fell. The Court of Claims has found that the hole was in a part of the premises *“*constructed, controlled and maintained ” by the State; that it was located in a place which was *“*the only means of ingress and egress ” to the apartment; that the hole was six to eight inches deep and a foot wide, ragged and uneven; and that a recent fall of snow had, on January 7, 1950, covered the outline of the hole. The court held, however, that the State was not negligent and that Mrs. Mace was herself negligent and dismissed the claim of Mrs. Mace and her husband. We feel bound by our prior decision in this case (2 A D 2d 629) to reverse the judgment. On a former trial at the close of claimants’ proof the Court of Claims had dismissed the claim and granted judgment for the State on the ground that even if the State’s negligence be conceded, as the court apparently inferentially did in an oral opinion, Mrs. Mace had herself been negligent in stepping in the hole. In reversing that judgment this court held unequivocally that the record “ establishes a *prima facie*ease ”. On the second trial, however, the entire record in the first trial was stipulated in and the State merely offered some general observations by a bread delivery salesman as to the condition of the street and some general photographs taken many months later. Nothing whatever was added to the record in respect of the specific hole or condition existing on the day of the accident and therefore on every element pertinent to the issue the record is exactly the same one on which this court held that a prima facie case was made out. The State was under no obligation on the second trial to stipulate the same record; it could have controverted the issue of negligence on the merits, in view of the ruling made here on the first record; but on the second appeal we are confronted by exactly the same record in every material respect as was here before. Indeed, the Judge who directed the present judgment did not personally hear the claimants’ case or any evidence directly bearing on the issue. If we were right on the first appeal in ruling that a prima facie ease was made out then, the ruling still must be followed. Almost 11 years have gone by since the accident in January, 1950, and we see no need to remit the ease again. Judgment reversed on the law and the facts and judgment directed for claimant Bernadine E. Mace in the sum of $850 and Thomas A. Mace in the sum of $150, with costs. Settle order.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              NOV-28-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   AUG-29-1998
<CASH>                                               7,761
<SECURITIES>                                        47,254
<RECEIVABLES>                                       28,519
<ALLOWANCES>                                         1,200
<INVENTORY>                                         34,544
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   118,577
<PP&E>                                             128,267
<DEPRECIATION>                                      87,299
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     163,281
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               18,202
<BONDS>                                                504
<COMMON>                                             1,318
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<OTHER-SE>                                         136,281
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       163,281
<SALES>                                            113,583
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   113,583
<CGS>                                               97,571
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       97,571
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    11,968
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       300
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      60
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      8,204
<INCOME-TAX>                                         2,470
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  5,734
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                         5,734
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         1.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         1.01
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 11 (Tuesday, January 19, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5225-5226]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-00984]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of General Medical Sciences; Notice of Closed 
Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of General Medical 
Sciences Special Emphasis Panel, Review of NIGMS Pathway to 
independence Award K99/R00 Applications.
    Date: March 25, 2021.
    Time: 10:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Natcher Building, 45 
Center Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Isaah S. Vincent, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Office of Scientific Review, National Institute of General 
Medical Sciences, National Institutes of Health, 45 Center Drive, 
Room 3AN12L, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-594-2948, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#630a1002020b4d150a0d00060d17230d0a0b4d040c15"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="99f0eaf8f8f1b7eff0f7fafcf7edd9f7f0f1b7fef6ef">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.375, 
Minority Biomedical Research Support; 93.821, Cell Biology and 
Biophysics Research; 93.859, Pharmacology, Physiology, and 
Biological Chemistry

[[Page 5226]]

Research; 93.862, Genetics and Developmental Biology Research; 
93.88, Minority Access to Research Careers; 93.96, Special Minority 
Initiatives; 93.859, Biomedical Research and Research Training, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 12, 2021.
Miguelina Perez,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2021-00984 Filed 1-15-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Ensure all soft dampers and vibration absorbers are in good condition before every flight If not, replace 

immediately Otherwise, the flight performance of your aircraft will be adversely affected. 
lltliJ 



)0 




MlQ.;_o 

M2 .. iJOI o 1 . 10 0 

M3; M4 ' .~· '0 0 M6~·,1 MS~·.·~O~ U 

. ; 0 0 0 

:O 0 0 

l_j '~0 0 0 

Ml @~ o0Go .. 

M2 o o 1o 

I 

M3 o o o 

M4 o o o 

MS 

M6 

Ml 

M2 

M3 

M4 

M5 

M6 

;6r 
1'-11 0 0 · 0 

1'-12 0 0 0 

1'-13 0 0 0 

- ) 1'-14 0 0 0 ~ 1'-15 0 0 0 

1'-16 0 0 0 

0 0 0 

0 0 0 

Connecting the flight controller and landing gear 

15 
.

/ 

; 

' I 

/ I , I . 

, I /::; 

/ ! ;"} 

0
<PAGE>



                                  EXHIBIT 4.1




<PAGE>

                     VALLEY COMMUNITY BANCSHARES, INC.
                        PUYALLUP, WASHINGTON  98372
            Incorporated under the laws of the State of Washington
------------------                                          ------------------
CERTIFICATE NUMBER                                                SHARES
------------------                                          ------------------

------------------                                          ------------------


THIS                                                           SEE REVERSE FOR
CERTIFIES                                                  CERTAIN DEFINITIONS
THAT

                                                              IS THE
                                                            OWNER OF


                                   COMMON


          FULLY PAID $1.00 PAR VALUE SHARES OF THE COMMON STOCK OF VALLEY
COMMUNITY BANCSHARES, INC., Transfereable only on the books of the
Corporation by the holder hereof or by duly authorized attorney upon
surrender of this certificate properly endorsed.

          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused this certificate to
be signed by its duly authorized officers and its corporate seal to be
hereunto affixed.

DATED:                                [SEAL]

--------------------------------                   ----------------------------
   SECRETARY/ASSISTANT SECRETARY                       PRESIDENT/VICE PRESIDENT
17.403 Procedures. ( a ) The contracting officer may award a prime contract to a— ( 1 ) Leader company, obligating it to subcontract a designated portion of the required end items to a specified follower company and to assist it to produce the required end items;
( 2 ) Leader company, for the required assistance to a follower company, and a prime contract to the follower for production of the items; or
( 3 ) Follower company, obligating it to subcontract with a designated leader company for the required assistance.
( b ) The contracting officer shall ensure that any contract awarded under this arrangement contains a firm agreement regarding disclosure, if any, of contractor trade secrets, technical designs or concepts, and specific data, or software, of a proprietary nature.
```

[110th Congress Public Law 207]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ207.110]

[[Page 122 STAT. 719]]

Public Law 110-207
110th Congress

                                 An Act

 
   To amend title 36, United States Code, to revise the congressional 
 charter of the Military Order of the Purple Heart of the United States 
   of America, Incorporated, to authorize associate membership in the 
  corporation for the spouse and siblings of a recipient of the Purple 
          Heart medal. <<NOTE: Apr. 30, 2008 -  [H.R. 1119]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress <<NOTE: Purple Heart Family Equity 
Act of 2007. 36 USC 101 note.>> assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Purple Heart Family Equity Act of 
2007''.
SEC. 2. ASSOCIATE MEMBERSHIP IN THE MILITARY ORDER OF THE PURPLE 
                    HEART OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 
                    INCORPORATED.

    Section 140503(b) of title 36, United States Code, is amended by 
striking ``parents and lineal descendants'' and inserting ``the parents, 
spouse, siblings, and lineal descendants''.

    Approved April 30, 2008.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 1119:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 110-428 (Comm. on the Judiciary).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD:
                                                        Vol. 153 (2007):
                                    Nov. 6, considered and passed House.
                                                        Vol. 154 (2008):
                                    Apr. 14, considered and passed 
                                        Senate.

                                  <all>
```
M. P. No. 75-137.

#### Michael O. Massey *v.*James W. Mullen, *Warden.*

*William F. Reilly,*Public Defender, *Allegra E. Munson,*Asst. Public Defender, for petitioner. *Julius C. Michaelson,*Attorney General, for respondent.

Respondent is directed to file his answer to the-petition for writ of habeas corpus and to the motion for admission to bail and therein to *show cause,*if any he has, why the writ should not issue as prayed and why petitioner should not be admitted to bail, said answer to be made in compliance with the provisions of Rule 14.
Exhibit 10.8

BRIGGS & STRATTON CORPORATION

Form 10-Q for Quarterly Period Ended September 30, 2007

AMENDMENT TO THE BRIGGS & STRATTON

CORPORATION ECONOMIC VALUE ADDED

INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN

Effective January 1, 2008



---

WHEREAS, the Committee has established and administers the Briggs & Stratton Corporation
Economic Value Added Incentive Compensation Plan (the Plan) pursuant to the shareholder-approved Briggs & Stratton Corporation Incentive Compensation Plan; and

WHEREAS, it is necessary to make certain amendments to the Plan for purposes of compliance with Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code;

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED, that the Plan is amended in the following respects effective January 1, 2008:



| | 1. | The phrase on or before the end of the second month following in paragraphs A and B of Article VIII of the Plan is replaced with the phrase during the 60 day
period following.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | A new paragraph E is added to Article X to read as follows:
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------



| | E. | Section 409A. To facilitate compliance with Internal Revenue Code Section 409A, a payment otherwise required to be paid under this Plan shall be neither accelerated
nor deferred nor shall there otherwise be a change in the time at which any payment due hereunder is to be paid, except pursuant to a specific written amendment adopted by the Board of Directors of Briggs & Stratton Corporation, which
amendment is consistent with the requirements of applicable regulations under Internal Revenue Code Section 409A. Further, no individual shall be deemed to have a termination of employment for purposes of this Plan unless such termination of
employment also constitutes a separation from service within the meaning of Code Section 409A.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 84 

AN ACT 

To provide for an exception to a limitation against appointment of persons as Secretary of Defense within seven 

years of relief from active duty as a regular commissioned officer of the Armed Forces. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 84 ES

1 SECTION 1. EXCEPTION TO LIMITATION AGAINST APPOINT2 MENT OF PERSONS AS SECRETARY OF DE3 FENSE WITHIN SEVEN YEARS OF RELIEF 

4 FROM ACTIVE DUTY AS REGULAR COMMIS5 SIONED OFFICERS OF THE ARMED FORCES. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding the second sen7 tence of section 113(a) of title 10, United States Code, 

8 the first person appointed, by and with the advice and con9 sent of the Senate, as Secretary of Defense after the date 

10 of the enactment of this Act may be a person who is, on 

11 the date of appointment, within seven years after relief, 

12 but not within three years after relief, from active duty 

13 as a commissioned officer of a regular component of the 

14 Armed Forces. 

15 (b) LIMITED EXCEPTION.—This section applies only 

16 to the first person appointed as Secretary of Defense as 

17 described in subsection (a) after the date of the enactment 

18 of this Act, and to no other person. 

Passed the Senate January 12, 2017. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 84 

AN ACT 

To provide for an exception to a limitation against 

Forces. a regular commissioned officer of the Armed within seven years of relief from active duty as appointment of persons as Secretary of Defense
<TABLE>
                               EXHIBIT 11(a)
                               -------------

                              GROSSMAN'S INC.

                     COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                   (in thousands, except per share data)

<CAPTION>
                              THREE MONTHS ENDED       NINE MONTHS ENDED
                                 SEPTEMBER 30,           SEPTEMBER 30,     
                              --------------------    --------------------
                                1995        1994        1995        1994
                                ----        ----        ----        ----
<S>                           <C>        <C>          <C>        <C>
Net income (loss) for 
primary and fully diluted 
earnings per share            $15,320    $    505     $ 5,704    $   (868) 
                              ========   =========    =========  =========

Weighted average number 
  of shares outstanding        26,031      25,823       25,949     25,748

Net effect of dilutive 
  stock options                    -           -           -           -   
                             ---------   ---------    ---------  ---------

Total weighted average 
  shares outstanding and 
  common stock equivalents 
  used in primary 
  calculation of earnings 
  per share                    26,031      25,823       25,949     25,748

Additional dilution from 
  stock options                    -           76          -           -   
                              --------    ---------   ---------  ---------

Total weighted average 
  shares outstanding and 
  common stock equivalents 
  used in fully diluted
  calculation of earnings 
  per share                    26,031      25,899       25,949     25,748
                              ========   =========    =========  ========= 


Primary earnings (loss) 
  per share                    $ 0.59      $ 0.02      $ 0.22      $(0.03) 
                              ========   =========    =========  ========= 

Fully diluted earnings 
  (loss) per share             $ 0.59      $ 0.02      $ 0.22      $(0.03) 
                              ========   =========    =========  ========= 

</TABLE>
#### 18.126 Contractor rent-free use of Government property.

Rental requirements do not apply to items of Government production and research property that are part of a general program approved by the Federal Emergency Management Agency and meet certain criteria. (See 45.301.)

[71 FR 38248, July 5, 2006, as amended at 72 FR 27384, May 15, 2007. Redesignated at 72 FR 46344, Aug. 17, 2007. Redesignated at 76 FR 18309, Apr. 1, 2011]
BEFORE THE

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION WASHINGTON, D.C.

Joint Application of

DELTA AIR LINES, INC. and CZECH AIRLINES, et al.

for statements of authorization pursuant to 14 C.F.R. 212 (Open Skies Blanket Codesharing) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Docket OST-2000-8207

NOTICE OF ADDITIONAL CODESHARING

Communications with respect to this document should be addressed to:

Allan I. Mendelsohn

Sher & Blackwell 1850 M Street, NW, Suite 900 Washington, DC 20036 (202) 463-2508

Counsel for CZECH AIRLINES Alexander Van der Bellen Managing Director – Government Affairs

& Associate General Counsel Jeff Morgan Regional Director – Government Affairs DELTA AIR LINES, INC.
1212 New York Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20005 (202) 842-4184 sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com

February 2, 2010BEFORE THE

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION WASHINGTON, D.C.

Joint Application of

DELTA AIR LINES, INC. and CZECH AIRLINES, et al.

for statements of authorization pursuant to 14 C.F.R. 212 (Open Skies Blanket Codesharing) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Docket OST-2000-8207

NOTICE OF ADDITIONAL CODESHARING

Pursuant to the blanket statements of authorization granted in the captioned

docket to Delta Air Lines, Inc., Czech Airlines, and their respective affiliates, the carriers

hereby notify the Department that, beginning no earlier than 30 days from today, Delta

Air Lines plans to display its “DL” designator code on flights operated by Czech Airlines

on the following route:

Prague, Czech Republic (PRG) – Minsk, Belarus (MSQ)

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Allan I. Mendelsohn

______________________ Allan I. Mendelsohn

Sher & Blackwell

Counsel for CZECH AIRLINES Alexander Van der Bellen Managing Director, Government Affairs &

Associate General Counsel DELTA AIR LINES, INC.CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

A copy of the foregoing Notice has been served this 2 nd day of February, 2010, upon the following persons via email:

carl.nelson@aa.com; julie.oettinger@united.com; jeffrey.manley@united.com; hkamen@coair.com; dan.weiss@coair.com; howard.kass@usairways.com; benjamin.slocum@usairways.com; John.Allen@faa.gov; esta.rosenberg@dot.gov;
mike.orr@airlineinfo.com