alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Income-Driven Repayment (IDR) Notification Pilots

On March 10, President Obama announced a series of actions designed to help student loan borrowers in a Student Aid Bill of Rights, including the development and implementation of behaviorally designed pilots to identify the most effective ways to communicate with borrowers to maximize successful borrower repayment.  In an effort to improve communication to borrowers in IDR plans and ensure a smooth, on-time renewal process, Federal Student Aid (FSA) and the White House Social and Behavioral Sciences Team (SBST) are collaborating on a series of Income-Driven Repayment Plan Notification Pilots, scheduled to run from April 2015 through September 2015.

During the first session of the negotiated rulemaking on expanding and targeting the benefits of Pay As You Earn, dated March 23, 2015 – March 25, 2015, several non-Federal negotiators on the committee asked if the communications borrowers receive before renewing their Income-Driven Repayment (IDR) plans could be revised to improve their effectiveness. 

The first IDR Notification Pilot will take place during April 2015, for cohorts of borrowers whose IDR anniversary dates occur during the month of July. During this initial pilot, FSA and the SBST will develop communications to be sent to borrowers via e-mail that supplement the regulatorily required communications that servicers already send to borrowers. These communications will remind borrowers to renew their Income Driven-Repayment Plan income documentation and family size.  E-mails from the Department of Education will notify borrowers that they should have received similar correspondence from their servicer and will provide a direct link into the StudentLoans.gov Income-Driven Repayment Plan application. 

The next phase of the IDR Notification Pilot will occur over two IDR renewal cycles. FSA will require that specific Federal loan servicers with large IDR loan portfolios to suppress their notification process for borrowers whose IDR anniversary dates occur in August and September 2015. During this time, FSA will send the regulatorily required IDR notifications and test a variety of messages to assess the impact of the communication and the influence of emails sent from a Department of Education e-mail address (e.g., donotreply@studentloans.gov), as opposed to a loan servicer e-mail address, on borrower IDR renewal rates.
#### Evelyn Vail, Respondent, v Black Brothers Co., Appellant. (And Two Other Actions.)

— Order unanimously affirmed, with costs, upon the opinion at Special Term, Kronenberg, J. (Appeal from order of Cattaraugus Supreme Court — disclosure.) Present — Cardamone, J. P., Schnepp, Callahan, Doerr and Moule, JJ.
# United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604

July 10, 2019

Before

KENNETH F. RIPPLE, Circuit Judge

DANIEL A. MANION, Circuit Judge

DIANE S. SYKES, Circuit Judge

No. 17-2040

J OHN DOE, Plaintiff-Appellant

,

v

.

KEVIN K. MCALEENAN, Acting Secretary of Homeland Security, et al., Defendants-Appellees

. Appeal from the United States District

Court for the Northern District of
Illinois, Eastern Division.

No. 1:15-cv-11168

J ohn Z. Lee, Judge

.

O R D E R

On consideration of the letter of the Government requesting correction of the opinion in this appeal issued on July 3, 2019, the opinion is amended on page 3 by replacing “and up to $3,000,000 for a new commercia l enterprise located in an area with an unemployment rate significantly below the national average” with “and $1,000,000 for a new commercial enterprise located in any other area.”
SERVED: . .. sEP:'f6rrrER.4'2012 . . . . ·, . , . . . .. > ' ' ;. \l . ~ ' ' ' ' 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

. OFFICE OF HEARlNGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MA TIER OF 

LEADING EDGE AVIATION, INC •. 

FAA DOCKET NO: [TO BE ASSIGNED] 

·(Civil Penalty Action) 

DMS No. FAA-2012-0783 

ORDER GRANTING 

COMPLAINANT'S MOTION 

... 

. 

.. 

Complainant Federal Aviation Administration ("Complainant") has registered 

an objection to the Ar'tswer~of Respondent Leading Edge Aviation, Inc:~£. 

("Respondent") to the extent that the Answer asks that the Complaint be 

dismissed. I agree with Complainant that Respondent has not· sustairfed its burden 

of proof; the Complaint, I conclude, states a cause of action. Compta1nant's Motion 

therefore is GRANTED and Respondent's request that the Complafnt b~e: dismissed is 

DENIED. . . '"'7 ,.. 

. 

uwc,~ Richard C. Go~~wi~ ·· . ~.• ·. . .·· 

Administrative Law Judge 

Attachment- ServiceUs~: 

: (> •• 
SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000 1 

Fred C. Begy, III, Respondent's Counsel 

Chuhak &Tecson, Attorneys at Law 

30 South Wacker Drive, Suite 2600 

Chicago, IL 60606 

TEL: 312-855-5442 

FAX: '312-368-9422 

Carri A. Conlon, Respondent's Counsel 

Chuhak &Tecson, Attorneys· at Law 

30 South Wacker Drive, Suite 2600 

Chicago, IL 60606 

TEL: 312-855-4617 

FAX: 312-444-9027 

ONE COPY 

Jeffrey M. Harper, Complainant's Counsel 

Attorney, Office ofRegional Counsel 

Northwest Mountain Region, ANM-7 

Federal Aviation Administration 

1601 Lind Avenue, S.W. 

. Renton, W A 98057 

TEL: 425-227-2161 

FAX: 425-227-1007 

. . 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, AdministraJjve Law Judge 

Office ofHearings, M-20, · -·.J 

U.S. Department of Transportation . 

1200 New Jersey Aven]Je, S.E. (E11-310) 

Washington, DC 20590, 

TEL: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 

202-366-5121-Staff Assistant FAX: 202-366-7536 

FDMS No. FAA-2012-0783 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

.. 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2WlOOO,.Washiqgton, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
U.S. DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

ATTORNEY APPEARANCE FORM

NOTE: In order to appear before this Court an attorney must either be a member in good standing of this 

Court’s general bar or be granted leave to appear pro hac vice as provided for by Local Rules 83.12 through 

83.14. 

In the Matter of Pearson v. Target Corporation Case Number: 

1 1

1:11-cv-07972 

 

AN APPEARANCE IS HEREBY FILED BY THE UNDERSIGNED AS ATTORNEY FOR: 

(In the space below, enter the name of the party or parties being represented) 

Theodore H. Frank 

NAME (Type or print) 

Melissa Pavely 

SIGNATURE (Use electronic signature if the appearance form is filed electronically) 

 s/Melissa Pavely 

FIRM The Tucker Firm, LLC

STREET ADDRESS 1723 North Halsted Street

CITY/STATE/ZIP Chicago, Illinois 60614

ID NUMBER (SEE ITEM 3 IN INSTRUCTIONS) 6292637 TELEPHONE NUMBER 312.202.0222

ARE YOU ACTING AS LEAD COUNSEL IN THIS CASE? (Enter “Y” or “N”) N

ARE YOU ACTING AS LOCAL COUNSEL IN THIS CASE? (Enter “Y” or “N”)Y

ARE YOU A MEMBER OF THIS COURT’S TRIAL BAR? (Enter “Y” or “N”) N

IF THIS CASE REACHES TRIAL, WILL YOU ACT AS THE TRIAL ATTORNEY? (Enter “Y” or “N”) N

IF THIS IS A CRIMINAL CASE, USE AN “X” TO DESCRIBE YOUR STATUS IN THIS CASE. 

 RETAINED COUNSEL APPOINTED COUNSEL

Case: 1:11-cv-07972 Document #: 127 Filed: 09/09/13 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:2201
Order entered October 10, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-00631-CV

VIRGILIO AVILA AND UNIVISION TELEVISION GROUP, INC., Appellants

V.

F.B. LARREA, Appellee

On Appeal from the 95th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-11-10828

ORDER

We GRANT appellee’s October 8, 2014 second motion for extension of time to file brief 

to the extent we ORDER the brief be filed no later than November 17, 2014. No further 

extensions will be granted absent exigent circumstances.

/s/ ADA BROWN 

JUSTICE
1850.103-570 Submission of request to the Contract Adjustment Board. ( a ) After investigating the facts and issues relevant to the contractor's request, the contracting officer shall forward the request to the Associate General Counsel for Contracts and Procurement Law, including in the forwarding letter— ( 1 ) The nature of the case;
( 2 ) The recommended disposition; and,
( 3 ) If contractual action is recommended, the contracting officer's opinion that the action will facilitate the national defense.
( b ) The forwarding letter shall enclose the contractor's request, all supporting material submitted by the contractor, and any material the contracting officer has obtained while investigating the facts and issues relevant to the request. Any classified information in the material forwarded shall be so identified.
( c ) Electronic submittal is preferred for unclassified material.
[76 FR 72328, Nov. 23, 2011, as amended at 80 FR 36722, June 26, 2015]
# Euroopa Liidu C 330A/7. o

| | ISSN 1977-0898 |
| --- | --- |
| Euroopa Liidu
  Teataja | C 330A |
| | |
| Eestikeelne väljaanne | Teave ja teatised | 58. köide7. oktoober 2015 |

ISSN 1977-0898

Euroopa Liidu

Teataja

C 330A

Eestikeelne väljaanne

Teave ja teatised

58. köide7. oktoober 2015

---

| Teatis nr | Sisukord | Lehekülg |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Teated |
| | HALDUSMENETLUSED |
| | Euroopa personalivaliku amet (EPSO) |
| 2015/C 330A/01 | Tühistamisteade | 1 |

Teatis nr

Sisukord

Lehekülg

V   Teated

HALDUSMENETLUSED

Euroopa personalivaliku amet (EPSO)

2015/C 330A/01

Tühistamisteade

1

---

| ET | |
| --- | --- |

ET

---

V Teated

HALDUSMENETLUSED

Euroopa personalivaliku amet (EPSO)

| 7.10.2015 | ET | Euroopa Liidu Teataja | CA 330/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.10.2015

ET

Euroopa Liidu Teataja

CA 330/1

---

TÜHISTAMISTEADE

(2015/C 330 A/01)

Avalikku konkurssi EPSO/AD/321/15 – auditi valdkonna administraatorid (AD 5/AD 7) – käsitleva teate avaldamine Euroopa Liidu Teatajas
   (1) on tühistatud.

---

(1)  ELT C 316 A, 24.9.15, lk 1.

---
#### 1503.1071 Contract clause.

Contracting Officers, with advisement from the program office, must insert the contract clause at 1552.203-72—*Scientific Integrity,* in solicitations and contracts when the Contractor may be required to perform, communicate, or supervise scientific activities, or use scientific information to perform advisory and assistance services. Examples of such scientific activities include, but are not limited to, computer modeling, economic analysis, field sampling, laboratory experimentation, demonstrating new technology, statistical analysis, and writing a review article on a scientific issue.

[85 FR 66269, Oct. 19, 2020]
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 10.6


                                   THE BON-TON


HEYWOOD L. WILANSKY
President/CEO

                                  April 4, 2000

Mr. James Baireuther
942 High Meadow Court
Lancaster, PA 17601

Dear Jim:

         I am pleased to inform you that Bon-Ton Stores, Inc. ("the Company")
has decided to promote you, effective February 1, 2000 to the position of
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer in charge of Finance,
Information Services, and Store Planning and Construction.

         In connection with your promotion, you are eligible for a Supplemental
Retirement Benefit ("SRB") payable by the Company in the amount of $30,000
annually, provided that you remain continuously within the employ of the Company
until February 1, 2005 and retire on or after that date. The SRB shall be
payable in equal monthly installments commencing with the month of your
retirement (on or after February 1, 2005) through the month of the date of your
death. In the event that you and the Company mutually agree to continue your
employment after February 1, 2005, the amount of your annual supplemental
retirement benefit shall increase by $10,000 for each full year of employment
(ending on January 31 of any year) completed by you prior to your retirement to
a maximum benefit of $80,000 annually payable upon your retirement on or after
February 1, 2010. Your SRB shall be subject to forfeiture in its entirety in the
event you are discharged for "Cause" at any time (which shall be defined to
include discharge for willful misconduct, fraud, misappropriation, embezzlement,
gross negligence, self-dealing, dishonesty, misrepresentation, conflict of
interest, conviction of a crime of moral turpitude or material violation of any
material Company policy).

         Your eligibility for the SRB is not a promise of continuing employment.
You remain free to resign your position with the Company at any time, and the
Company retains the right to terminate your employment at any time, with or
without Cause.

         The SRB is in addition to and not in lieu of any other retirement
benefit to which you may be entitled as an employee of the Company.

         I appreciate very much all that you have done for the Company and look
forward to continue to working with you in the future.

         On a personal note, I am really happy to be able to offer you this
added long-term benefit which will provide added security to you and your
family's future.

                                     Sincerely yours,
                                     /s/  Heywood Wilansky
                                      Heywood Wilansky

                       The Bon-Ton Department Stores, Inc.
              2801 East Market Street, PO Box 2821, York, PA 17405
                      TEL: (717) 757-3079 FAX: 717-751-3196
Case: 1:12-cv-01446 Document #: 209 Filed: 09/20/13 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:3987
Case: 1:12-cv-01446 Document #: 209 Filed: 09/20/13 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:3988
A04A0573.

#### GENERAL MOTORS ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION v. STATE OF GEORGIA.

(619 SE2d 713)

Decided August 3, 2005.

*Sutherland, Asbill & Brennan, Valerie S. Sanders, William D. Barwick, Thomas M. Byrne, McCullough & Payne, John D. McCullough,*for appellant.

*Andrew T. Jones, Gary D. Bergman,*for appellee.

BLACKBURN, Presiding Judge.

In *Gen. Motors Acceptance Corp. v. State of Ga.,*
      *1*
      **
      2the Supreme Court reversed the judgment of this Court in *Gen. Motors Acceptance Corp. v. State of Ga*
      *2*
      **Therefore, we vacate our earlier opinion and adopt the judgment of the Supreme Court as our own.

*Judgment reversed.*

*Ruffin, C. J., Andrews, P. J., Barnes, Mikell, Adams and Bernes, JJ., concur.*

*Gen. Motors Acceptance Corp. v. State of Ga.,*279 Ga. 328 (613 SE2d 641) (2005).

*Gen. Motors Acceptance Corp. v. State of Ga.,*268 Ga. App. 473 (602 SE2d 235) (2004).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000

<S>                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                             201
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             490
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      4,167
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                             863
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                               870
<LOANS>                                         22,952
<ALLOWANCE>                                        181
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  29,702
<DEPOSITS>                                      17,244
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                721
<LONG-TERM>                                      9,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            24
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,713
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  29,702
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                    431
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                   89
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    13
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                   533
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                 177
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 310
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                              223
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   6
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                    185
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     46
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                          46
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        29
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .14
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.13
<LOANS-NON>                                         83
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   204
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       42
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  181
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               181
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
Docket No. FAA

- 

### 2015

- 3990 Directorate Identifier: 

### 2014

- NM

- 225

- AD

. Contacts. With w h om o u tsi d e the F A A has t h is pr o p os al be en dis c u s se d ?

Org a ni z a t i on Per s on C o nta c ted Da t e Re sp on s e

Nat i onal Bus i ness Aircraft As s o ciat i o n Eli Cotti 12 / 10 / 14

R e gio n al Airline As s o ci a ti o n 12 / 10 / 14

Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association Robert Hackman 12 / 10 / 14

Airlines for America Robert Ireland 12 / 10 / 14
1815.207-71 Appointing non-Government evaluators as special Government employees. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, non-Government evaluators, except employees of JPL, shall be appointed as special Government employees.
( b ) Appointment as a special Government employee is a separate action from the approval required by paragraph 1815.207-70(b) and may be processed concurrently. Appointment as a special Government employee shall be made by: ( 1 ) The NASA Headquarters personnel office when the release of proposal information is to be made by a NASA Headquarters office; or
( 2 ) The installation personnel office when the release of proposal information is to be made by the installation.
( c ) Non-Government evaluators need not be appointed as special Government employees when they evaluate: ( 1 ) Proposals submitted in response to broad agency announcements such as Announcements of Opportunity and NASA Research Announcements;
( 2 ) Unsolicited proposals; and
( 3 ) SBIR and STTR proposals.
[63 FR 9954, Feb. 27, 1998, as amended at 63 FR 44408, Aug. 19, 1998]
#### 2009.403 Definitions.

As used in 2009.4:

*Debarring official* means the Senior Procurement Executive.

*Suspending official* means the Senior Procurement Executive.
```

                                                     EXHIBIT 32.2

                   Section 1350 Certification
                 By Principal Financial Officer

     I,  Craig  R.  Jones, certify that the periodic  report,  to
which  this  Statement  is  attached,  fully  complies  with  the
requirements  of  Section 13(a) or 15(d) of  the  Securities  and
Exchange  Act  of  1934,  and the information  contained  in  the
periodic  report  to  which this Statement  is  attached,  fairly
present,  in  all material respects, the financial condition  and
results of operations of the registrant.

     A  signed  original  of  this  written  statement  has  been
provided  to the Company and will be retained by the Company  and
furnished to the SEC upon request.

     Dated March 24, 2005

                              /s/ Craig R. Jones
                              Craig R. Jones
                              Chief Financial Officer
```
#### 1846.670-1 General.

This subpart contains procedures and instructions for use of the DD Form 250, Material Inspection and Receiving Report (MIRR), (DD Form 250 series equivalents, and commercial shipping/packing lists used to document Government contract quality assurance (CQA).

[80 FR 12944, Mar. 12, 2015]
FY 2022 AGENCY FINANCIAL REPORT 158 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

OTHER INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)

limate change impacts on students, families, 

schools, and communities across the country 

are present, severe, and worsening. Pathways 

through which climate change affects student achievement 

include school closures due to extreme weather or unsafe 

conditions, poor environmental conditions within schools 

that impede learning, students’ own personal health and 

safety, increased social and emotional anxiety related to 

climate change and extreme weather events, and increased 

migration and economic disruption for households and 

communities. 

In September 2021, the Department released a new 

FY 2021 Climate Adaptation Plan. With this new 

plan, the Department acknowledges that climate change 

is affecting the Department’s mission and the need for 

comprehensive and urgent action to promote adaptation 

and resilience through the Department’s programs and 

operations. This plan builds on the lessons learned from 

the Department’s past sustainability action plans, climate 

change adaptation plans, and environmental justice plans 

to offer new actions that the Department can undertake 

to better adapt to climate change and develop agency 

resilience and resilience across the nation’s schools.

Climate Adaptation Plan
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 23



                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
33-58750 on Form S-8 dated February 24, 1993; Registration Statement No.
33-58752 on Form S-8 dated February 24, 1993; Registration Statement No.
33-52487 on Form S-8 dated March 2, 1994 and Post-Effective Amendment No. 1
to Registration Statement No. 33-52487 on Form S-8 dated March 3, 1994;
Registration Statement No. 333-12743 on Form S-4 dated September 26, 1996;
Registration Statement No. 333-52575 on Form S-8 dated May 13, 1998;
Registration Statement No. 333-57273 on Form S-8 dated June 19, 1998;
Registration Statement No. 333-52238 on Form S-8 dated December 20, 2000 of
our report dated October 20, 2000, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements incorporated by reference in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) of
Andrew Corporation for the year ended September 30, 2000.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Chicago, Illinois
December 21, 2000
19.1404 Exclusions. This subpart does not apply to— ( a ) Requirements that can be satisfied through award to— ( 1 ) Federal Prison Industries, Inc. (*see* Subpart 8.6);
( 2 ) AbilityOne participating non-profit agencies for the blind or severely disabled (*see* Subpart 8.7);
( b ) Orders under indefinite-delivery contracts (see subpart 16.5). (But see 16.505(b)(2)(i)(F) for discretionary set-asides of orders);
( c ) Orders against Federal Supply Schedules (see subpart 8.4). (But see 8.405-5 for discretionary set-asides of orders); or
( d ) Requirements currently being performed by an 8(a) participant or requirements SBA has accepted for performance under the authority of the 8(a) program, unless SBA has consented to release the requirements from the 8(a) program.
[69 FR 25278, May 5, 2004, as amended at 70 FR 14955, Mar. 23, 2005; 76 FR 68035, Nov. 2, 2011; 79 FR 24202, Apr. 29, 2014; 82 FR 4731, Jan. 13, 2017]