alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Georgia Portland Cement & Slate Company *et al. v.*Jackson *et al.*

TlSH, G. J.

Eight persons brought an equitable action against a corporation and its officers, alleging that each of the petitioners was induced to purchase and pay for a given number of shares of stock of the corporation by reason of fraudulent misrepresentations (fully set forth) made, with intent to deceive petitioners, by the officers and authorized agents of the corporation. The relief prayed for was: (1) a receiver for the assets of the corporation and all of its books, papers, etc.; (2) an injunction restraining the officers of the corporation from “encumbering, transferring, or hypothecating” any of its assets until the termination of the suit; (3) judgments in favor of each of the petitioners for the amounts paid by them respectively for stock, with interest “against the corporation in so far as the same affects the land, or the fund arising from the sale thereof” (petitioners claiming that the money paid by them for stock was all that went towards paying for the land, title to which was taken in the name of the corporation); and (4) similar judgments for like amounts, with interest thereon, against each of the designated directors and officers of the corporation; “jointly and sev*669erally.” *Held:*“The power of appointing receivers and ordering injunctions should be prudently and cautiously exercised, and except in clear and urgent cases should not be resorted to.” Civil Code, § 5477. See also lb. §§ 5476, 5479. Accordingly, where, in a case of the character above stated, there were no allegations and proof of the insolvency of the corporation, nor of any danger that its assets (consisting solely of unimproved lands, rented out, by resolution passed in regular meeting by a large majority of the stockholders, for more than a sufficiency to pay taxes and other expenses) would deteriorate in value, nor that the claim of any of the petitioners was likely to be otherwise jeopardized before the termination of the action, it was error for the judge, in any view of the case, to appoint a receiver for the corporation and to grant an interlocutory injunction in accordance with the prayers of the petition.

April 16, 1913.

Injunction and receiver. Before Judge Bell. Fulton superior court. September 27, 1912.

*Hines & Jordan,*for plaintiffs in error.

*M-undy & Mundy,*contra.

*Judgment reversed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

     1.  Leisegang Medical, Inc. (Boca Raton, Florida)

     2.  Leisegang Feinmechanik-Optik GmbH (Berlin, Germany)

     3.  Galenica Inc. (New Brunswick, Canada)

     4.  Galenica, Inc. (Delaware)

     5.  Optical Filter Corporation (Natick, Massachusetts)

     6.  Optical Filter Corporation, GmbH (Waechtersbach, Germany)

     7.  Galileo Foreign Sales Corporation

     8.  Galileo Photonics, Inc.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Winthrop
Residential Associates III, A Limited Partnership and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>      1


<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                       1,484,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>             0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       4,974,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              (2,706,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,186,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                      2,586,000
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,287,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,186,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,691,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,022,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             211,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              439,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            439,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   439,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    16.24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    16.24


</TABLE>
**U.S. Department of Education Negotiated Rulemaking**

**400 Maryland Ave. SW, Barnard Auditorium**

**Washington, D.C.**

**Accreditation and Innovation**

**January 14-16, 2019, 9:00am – 5:00 pm**

**AGENDA**

Welcome

Introductions

Overview of the negotiated rulemaking process

Review and adopt protocols

Petitions for membership

Overview of the issues

Formally finalize agenda 

Discussion of issues 

Next steps 

· Main Committee Meeting 2: February 19-22, 2019 

· Subcommittees:  January 17-18, 2019 and February 13-15, 2019

· Meeting Summary 

· Other
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 14 (Monday, January 25, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 6879]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-01495]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FARM CREDIT SYSTEM INSURANCE CORPORATION


Regular Meeting; Farm Credit System Insurance Corporation Board

AGENCY: Farm Credit System Insurance Corporation.

ACTION: Notice; regular meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given, in accordance with the provisions of 
Article VI of the Bylaws of the Farm Credit System Insurance 
Corporation (FCSIC), of a forthcoming regular meeting of the Board of 
Directors of FCSIC.

DATES: January 28, 2021, at 10:00 a.m. EDT, until such time as the 
Board may conclude its business. Note: Because of the COVID-19 
pandemic, we will conduct the board meeting virtually. If you would 
like to observe the open portion of the virtual meeting, see 
instructions below for board meeting visitors.

ADDRESSES: Because of the COVID-19 pandemic, we will conduct the board 
meeting virtually. If you would like to observe the open portion of the 
virtual meeting, see instructions in SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION for 
board meeting visitors.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dale Aultman, Secretary to the Board 
of the Farm Credit System Insurance Corporation, (703) 883-4009. TTY is 
(703) 883-4056.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Instructions for attending the virtual 
meeting: Parts of this meeting of the Board will be open to the public, 
and parts will be closed. To observe the open portion of the virtual 
meeting, go to FCSIC.gov, select ``News & Events,'' then ``Board 
Meetings.'' There you will find a description of the meeting and 
``Instructions for board meeting visitors.'' If you need assistance for 
accessibility reasons or if you have any questions, contact Dale 
Aultman, Secretary to the Farm Credit System Insurance Corporation 
Board, at (703) 883-4009. The matters to be considered at the meeting 
are as follows:

A. Approval of Minutes

<bullet> December 17, 2020

B. New Business

<bullet> Review of Insurance Premium Rates
<bullet> Policy Statement--Receivership and Conservatorship Counsel
<bullet> Policy Statement--Appraisals
<bullet> Policy Statement--Allowance for Insurance Fund Loss

C. Closed Session--Audit Committee

<bullet> CFO Report--List & Status of All Contracts
<bullet> Annual Report on Whistleblower Activity

    Dated: January 19, 2021.
Dale Aultman,
Secretary, Farm Credit System Insurance Corporation.
[FR Doc. 2021-01495 Filed 1-22-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6710-01-P
#### Ned Windus, as Administrator of the Estate of Connie Windus, Deceased, Appellant, v Ruth A. Baker, as Administratrix of the Estate of Zane Edwards, Deceased, Respondent.

— Judgment and order reversed, on the law and facts, with costs, and a new trial granted solely on the issue of damages. Memorandum: The 13-year-old decedent was overcome and died as a result of carbon-monoxide poisoning. In an action brought to recover for her wrongful death, the jury awarded her estate, in addition to the funeral expenses and a grave marker, the sum of $4,854.50 for pecuniary loss. In *834determining the "fair and just compensation” for the pecuniary loss resulting from the death of this minor "to the persons for whose benefit the action is brought” (EPTL 5-4.3), her age and life expectancy, state of health, current and probable future earnings during her minority above her support, the probability of her having means to support her parents, if they are in need and the voluntary assistance which decedent might have given to her parents are relevant factors to be considered *(Bartkowiak v St. Adalbert’s R. C. Church Soc.,*40 AD2d 306, 309-310). Also to be considered are the health, age, and condition of those for whose benefit the action is brought *(Arnold v State of New York,*163 App Div 253, 264-265). From all of these circumstances the question to be determined is what were the probable chances for pecuniary benefit from the decedent for those on whose behalf the action is brought and what those benefits, if any, were worth. This teen-aged girl was in excellent health, maintained good grades in junior high school, was an outgoing person, as evidenced by her position as cheerleader for junior high school sports teams, played a flute in the school band and attended church regularly where she was a member of the "Youth Fellowship.” Evidence of her future potential to her parents is gleaned from the fact that she was industrious and hard-working, holding a babysitting job during the summer and on weekends during the school year. She helped out at home and was described as a "mindful,” "mature and responsible,” "good girl” who had never had any problem in school. Although her surviving father and mother, aged 46 and 41, respectively, at the time of her death were separated, decedent maintained a close and loving relationship with each of them. We consider that the jury’s award upon this record inadequately appraised the parents’ chances for pecuniary benefit from the continuance of her life *(Russell v Cirillo,*17 AD2d 1005), and that there should, therefore, be a new trial limited solely to this issue. All concur, except Schnepp and Moule, JJ., who dissent and vote to affirm the order and judgment. (Appeal from judgment and order of Allegany Supreme Court— wrongful death.) Present — Cardamone, J. P., Schnepp, Callahan, Doerr and Moule, JJ.
| | EXHIBIT 32.2
| | ------------

Certification of Principal Financial Officer

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Annual Report of Aspen Exploration Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the annual period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                               |  |    |  |                                          
|------------------------------ |  | -- |  | -----------------------------------------
|Dated:      September 28, 2009 |  | By |  | /s/      Kevan B. Hensman                
|                               |  |    |  | Kevan B. Hensman, Chief Financial Officer

---
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 31.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

            PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, James J. Polakiewicz, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of Alpha Technologies Group, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) (Intentionally left blank)

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

/s/ James J. Polakiewicz
------------------------
James J. Polakiewicz
Chief Financial Officer
January 9, 2004
## KAUA I RESOR T Februar y 25,201 0 L ^amOtt . I DRXF T LETTE RO F SUPPOR

T T O U.S . DOT SUPPORTING HA^AHAI^JAIRLftfBS ' ci ^ I HA^fED

A APPtlCATIO N a

— I .—.'"'" ' •?— I Secretar y Ra y LaHpo d U.S . De^artment^of

Ti- s 120 0 iS^e w Jersey Ave, ! Washington J D C 2059 0 , . Q U.S . De^artmento f

Transportation , / > =^^o

120 0 I^e w Jersey Ave , SE ' .• > ^ RE : Applicatio n o

f Hawaiia n Airline s i

n th e 201 0 U.S.-Haned aCombinatioh Seryice s Allocatio n Proceeding , DOT-OST-2010-001 8 - Dea r Secretar y LaHood : I represent

the Kaua i Marriot t Resor t locate d i n Lihue , Kauai , Hawaii . Ou r faciht y i s ^ . aResor t wit h a.capacit

y o f 35 6 hotel rooms , 1 1 suite s an d 23 2 Tim e Shar e Villa s tha

t i s visite d b y approximately 46,00 0 peopl e pe r year .

, I writ e t o expres s ou

r strong suppor

t fo r Hawaiian' s Applicatio n fo r authorit y to serv e Tokyp' s Haned aAirport ; For man y years , visitor s fro

mJapa n hav e bee

n aver y importan

t par t o f ou r business , representin g abou t 4 % o f th e visitor s t o ou r Resort . Japanes e tourist s ar e amon g th e highes t spendin g visitor s to ou

r islands . Hawaiian' s propose d ne w daily servic e fro

m Hanedawil

l mak e Hawaii a n eve n mor e attractiv e destinatio n fo

r Japanes e travelers . B y departin g froih/foleyo'i s preferre d airpor t an d flying directl y to HoholulU v travel t o Hawaii vi-il

l becom e rhor e convenien

t an d accessible . . When^wai i i s amor

e attractiv e destination , al

l Hav)^ai | bujsinesse s stand t o benefit , i^clird» % ojj r

J^!isQip+.Pur,lJij^fe5^pe

s and vendors , Afcordiiigly , w t believ e tha t

th e awar d o f riaitedaslot s t o Hawajfa

n Airline s i s in the publi c interes t an d tha t Hawaiian' s Applicatio n shoul d b e graiiie d without

delay . Very , Truly ^urs,. y ; ' V ElliotMill s , ; Genera l Manage r

361 0 Ric e Street , Lihue , Kauai , Hauiai i 9676 6 • 808.245.505 0 • Fa x 808.245.504 9
#### David Halpern, an Infant, by His Guardian ad Litem, Kenneth L. Marks, et al., Appellants-Respondents, v. Jad Construction Corp. et al., Defendants, and Firestone Tire & Rubber Co., Respondent-Appellant.

Order, *876entered on November 2,1961, denying and granting in part the motion of defendant Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. to dismiss for insufficiency the four causes of action of the second amended complaint, imanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of granting the motion as to the first and second causes of action, and, as so modified, affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to defendant-respondent-appellant. The second amended complaint alleges Ford Motor Co. manufactured a tractor; that the tires thereof were manufactured by Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.; that Málvese Tractor & Implement Co. sold the tractor to Jad Construction Corp.; and that on July 31, 1958 the infant plaintiff was operating the tractor and was caused to fall therefrom because one of the tires blew out. The third and fourth causes of action are based on warranties of fitness for use and merchantability of the offending tire. The said warranties are not available to the plaintiffs. *(Goldberg*v. *Kollsman Instrument Corp.,*12 N Y 2d 432.) The first and second causes of action are insufficient for failure to allege facts establishing negligence. The allegation as to a blowout is not enough because it is consistent with the exercise of care in the manufacture of a tire. (Cf. *Campo*v. *Scofield,*301 N. Y. 468.) Insofar as the remaining allegations are applicable to the appellant, they are eonelusory and devoid of factual content. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, McNally, Stevens and Steuer, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  472,837
<ALLOWANCES>                                     7,500
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,460,934
<PP&E>                                       2,918,110
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,287,299
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,520,035
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,551,482
<BONDS>                                      1,982,546
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        94,201
<OTHER-SE>                                 (2,684,858)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,520,035
<SALES>                                     10,054,596
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            10,072,565
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               12,268,076
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               276,552
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 7,500
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             186,441
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,472,063)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,908
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,477,971)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,477,971)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.53)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.53)


</TABLE>
2009.570-9 Waiver. ( a ) The contracting officer determines the need to seek a waiver for specific contract awards with the advice and concurrence of the program office director and legal counsel. Upon the recommendation of the Senior Procurement Executive, and after consultation with legal counsel, the Executive Director for Operations may waive the policy in specific cases if he determines that it is in the best interest of the United States to do so.
( b ) Waiver action is strictly limited to those situations in which: ( 1 ) The work to be performed under contract is vital to the NRC program;
( 2 ) The work cannot be satisfactorily performed except by a contractor whose interests give rise to a question of conflict of interest.
( 3 ) Contractual and/or technical review and surveillance methods can be employed by the NRC to neutralize the conflict.
( c ) The justification and approval documents for any waivers must be placed in the NRC Public Document Room.
| Dated: April 4, 2011                                                      |   |   |   |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
|                                                                      |   |   |   |
|                                                                      |   |   |   |
| //S// Li Fu                                                               |   |   |   |
| Li FuCo-Chief Executive Officer(principal executive officer)              |   |   |   |
|                                                                      |   |   |   |
|                                                                      |   |   |   |
| //S// Joseph J. Longever                                                  |   |   |   |
| Joseph J. LongeverCo-Chief Executive Officer(principal executive officer) |   |   |   |

|                                                                   |   |   |   |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| //S// Craig H. Studwell                                                |   |   |   |
| Craig H. StudwellChief Financial Officer(principal accounting officer) |   |   |   |

----