alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

We hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Form 10-QSB of Reliability Incorporated (the Issuer) for the quarterly period ended
September 30, 2006 (the Periodic Report):



| | 1. | Fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |  |  |                               
|----------------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------------
|/s/ Larry Edwards       |  |  |  | /s/ James M. Harwell          
|Larry Edwards           |  |  |  | James M. Harwell              
|Chief Executive Officer |  |  |  | Acting Chief Financial Officer
|December 12, 2006       |  |  |  | December 12, 2006
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 02-40268 

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JAIME GARZA-HERNANDEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. M-01-CR-629-1

--------------------

February 20, 2003

Before WIENER, EMILIO M. GARZA, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jaime Garza-Hernandez appeals the sentence imposed following

his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United States

after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Garza argues

that the “felony” and “aggravated felony” provisions of 8 U.S.C.

§ 1326(b)(1) and (2) are unconstitutional.

Garza acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by

Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), but
No. 02-40268

-2-

asserts that the decision has been cast into doubt by Apprendi v.

New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). He seeks to preserve his

argument for further review. 

Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres. See Apprendi,

530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit, 231 F.3d 979, 984

(5th Cir. 2000). This court must follow Almendarez-Torres

“unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule

it.” Dabeit, 231 F.3d at 984 (internal quotation marks and

citation omitted). The judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.
#### Aquamarine Compania Naviera, S. A., Panama v. London *&*Overseas Ins. Co., et al.

Motion for a stay granted. Concur — Botein, P. J., Valente, Stevens, Eager and Bergan, JJ.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6.1.1

Eastern Division

Lester Dobbey

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:12−cv−01739

Honorable Robert M. Dow Jr.

Jacqueline Mitchell−Lawshea, et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Wednesday, July 27, 2016:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr: Status hearing set for

7/27/2016 is stricken and a back up status hearing is set for 9/29/2016 at 9:00 a.m. If a

stipulation of dismissal is filed before the next status hearing, the hearing will be cancelled

and the case closed. Mailed notice(cdh, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:12-cv-01739 Document #: 108 Filed: 07/27/16 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:656
#### 1552.209-75 Annual certification.

As prescribed in 1509.507-2(d), insert the following clause:

# Annual Certification (MAY 1994)

The Contractor shall submit an annual conflict of interest certification to the Contracting Officer. In this certification, the Contractor shall certify annually that, to the best of the Contractor's knowledge and belief, all actual or potential organizational conflicts of interest have been reported to EPA. In addition, in this annual certification, the Contractor shall certify that it has informed its personnel who perform work under EPA contracts or relating to EPA contracts of their obligation to report personal and organizational conflicts of interest to the Contractor. Such certification must be signed by a senior executive of the company and submitted in accordance with instructions provided by the Contracting Officer. The initial certification shall cover the one-year period from the date of contract award, and all subsequent certifications shall cover successive annual periods thereafter, until expiration or termination of the contract. The certification must be received by the Contracting Officer no later than 45 days after the close of the certification period covered.

(End of clause)

[59 FR 18623, Apr. 19, 1994. Redesignated at 61 FR 57339, Nov. 6, 1996, as amended at 62 FR 33573, June 20, 1997]
----

**EXHIBIT 10.27**

 

**MASTER LEASE AGREEMENT**

 

THIS MASTER LEASE AGREEMENT (**“Agreement”**) is entered into as of November 1, 2004 by SLOUGH SSF, LLC, a Delawarelimited liability company (**“Landlord”**), and GENENTECH, INC., a Delaware corporation (**“Tenant”**), with reference to the following facts: 

 

A. Landlord holds entitlements from the City of South San Francisco (the **“City”**) forthe construction of the following eight office and/or research and development buildings at the Britannia East Grand Business Park (the **“Center”**), located on the real property described in Exhibit A to the form of BuildingLease attached as Schedule 1(a) to this Agreement (the **“Property”**):
Exhibit 10.6.2
                                    AMENDMENT
                                     to the
                                ALBERTSON'S, INC.
                      EXECUTIVE DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN

     This Amendment is made by Albertson's,  Inc., a Delaware  corporation  (the
"Corporation").

                                    RECITALS:

     A. The Corporation  established the Albertson's,  Inc.  Executive  Deferred
Compensation Plan effective December 5, 1983 (the "Plan");

     B. The  Corporation,  pursuant to Section  8.01 of the Plan,  retained  the
right to amend the Plan and Section 8.01  provides  that the Plan may be amended
by the Corporation so long as such  amendments are  non-monetary in their effect
and do not materially alter plan benefits;  pursuant to resolutions duly adopted
by the Board of Directors of the Corporation, the Grantor Trust Committee of the
Board of  Directors  was  granted  the  authority  to amend the  Plans;  and the
Committee has been granted the authority to amend the Plans by the Grantor Trust
Committee so long as such amendments do not materially alter benefits;

     C. The Committee has  determined  that it is advisable to amend the Plan in
the manner  hereinafter  set forth and that such  amendment  does not materially
alter benefits.

                                    AMENDMENT

     The Plan is amended, as of December 15, 1998, in the following respects:

         Subsection  6.04(d)  of the Plan  shall be  deleted  and the  following
         language shall be substituted in its place:

                  (d) The Participant may modify the form of the distribution of
                  all or part of the  Participant's  Deferred  Benefit  Account,
                  provided that such  modification is made on a validly executed
                  and filed  election  form before the end of the calendar  year
                  which ends at least  twelve (12)  months  prior to the date on
                  which any distribution of the  Participant's  Deferred Benefit
                  Account shall have commenced.

     IN  WITNESS  WHEREOF,  this  instrument  has  been  duly  executed  by  the
undersigned as of December 15, 1998.

                                   ALBERTSON'S, INC.


                                   By:   /s/  Thomas R. Saldin
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                              Thomas R. Saldin
                                              Executive Vice President,
                                              Administration and General Counsel
#### 1846.670 Introduction.
Case: 1:12-cv-01411 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/28/12 Page 1 of 29 PageID #:1
Case: 1:12-cv-01411 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/28/12 Page 2 of 29 PageID #:2
Case: 1:12-cv-01411 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/28/12 Page 3 of 29 PageID #:3
Case: 1:12-cv-01411 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/28/12 Page 4 of 29 PageID #:4
Case: 1:12-cv-01411 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/28/12 Page 5 of 29 PageID #:5
Case: 1:12-cv-01411 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/28/12 Page 6 of 29 PageID #:6
Case: 1:12-cv-01411 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/28/12 Page 7 of 29 PageID #:7
Case: 1:12-cv-01411 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/28/12 Page 8 of 29 PageID #:8
Case: 1:12-cv-01411 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/28/12 Page 9 of 29 PageID #:9
Case: 1:12-cv-01411 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/28/12 Page 10 of 29 PageID #:10
Case: 1:12-cv-01411 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/28/12 Page 11 of 29 PageID #:11
Case: 1:12-cv-01411 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/28/12 Page 12 of 29 PageID #:12
Case: 1:12-cv-01411 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/28/12 Page 13 of 29 PageID #:13
Case: 1:12-cv-01411 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/28/12 Page 14 of 29 PageID #:14
Case: 1:12-cv-01411 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/28/12 Page 15 of 29 PageID #:15
Case: 1:12-cv-01411 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/28/12 Page 16 of 29 PageID #:16
Case: 1:12-cv-01411 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/28/12 Page 17 of 29 PageID #:17
Case: 1:12-cv-01411 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/28/12 Page 18 of 29 PageID #:18
Case: 1:12-cv-01411 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/28/12 Page 19 of 29 PageID #:19
Case: 1:12-cv-01411 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/28/12 Page 20 of 29 PageID #:20
Case: 1:12-cv-01411 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/28/12 Page 21 of 29 PageID #:21
Case: 1:12-cv-01411 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/28/12 Page 22 of 29 PageID #:22
Case: 1:12-cv-01411 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/28/12 Page 23 of 29 PageID #:23
Case: 1:12-cv-01411 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/28/12 Page 24 of 29 PageID #:24
Case: 1:12-cv-01411 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/28/12 Page 25 of 29 PageID #:25
Case: 1:12-cv-01411 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/28/12 Page 26 of 29 PageID #:26
Case: 1:12-cv-01411 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/28/12 Page 27 of 29 PageID #:27
Case: 1:12-cv-01411 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/28/12 Page 28 of 29 PageID #:28
Case: 1:12-cv-01411 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/28/12 Page 29 of 29 PageID #:29
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-8049

DAVID MAURICE MAMLIN, Petitioner - Appellant,

v. GENE M. JOHNSON, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections, Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge. (2:07-cv-00439-JBF-TEM)

Submitted: June 2, 2009 Decided: June 11, 2009

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David Maurice Mamlin, Appellant Pro Se. Joshua Mikell Didlake, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: David Maurice Mamlin seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district

court is likewise debatable. See Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Mamlin has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
M. P. No. 74-264.

#### Ruth Coolbeth *v.*Aram K. Berberian.

*John M. Roney, Rhode Island Legal*Services, *Inc.,*for plaintiff-respondent. *Aram K. Berberian,*defendant-petitioner, pro se.

Petition for writ of certiorari is denied without prejudice.
### Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA

- 

### 2014

- 0363 Directorate Identifier: 

### 2014

- NE

- 08

- AD

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If they do not, click (or Tab) into an d then out of the changed cell

.

**Estimated Costs:**

Action (e.g., Inspection, replacement) Do not include on

condition costs here Costs per **Product** (e.g., aircraft, engine,

propeller, appliance) Work

- hours (include access, testing, and close

- up) Labor

co st (@$8 5 /h our) Parts Cost Total Costs (labor + parts) Number of

**U.S. Registered**  **Products** Total Cost

for U.S. Fleet

6.0 $ 510.00 $ 510.00 

### 50 $ 25,500.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.0 0 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0. 00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00


### The known number of products in com pliance: Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $ 25,500 

### Costs covered under warranty ( if known ) $

**On**

**- Condit**  **ion Costs:**
Action (e.g., Inspection, replacement) Work

- hours

(include access, testing, and close

up) Labor cost

(@$85/hour) Parts Cost Cost per Product

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00



### Special considerations for Economic Analysis ( Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs) 

### :

### Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES * NO

* Explanation: **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:**
Is the AD significant?

YES * NO

* Explanation: **Regulatory Flexibility Act:**
Will th e AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? E xplain for

either a Yes or No answer.

YES NO Explanation:

**Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:**
This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES * NO



### * Explanation 

### :
|   | · | The                Covered Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)                or                15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;                and                    |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                     |
|   | · | The                information contained in the Covered Report fairly presents, in all                material respects, the financial condition and results of operations                of                the Company. |

| Date:                March 3, 2006 | /s/ John                R.                Biggar                                   John                R. BiggarExecutive                Vice President andChief                Financial OfficerPPL                Corporation |
|------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
<PAGE>
 
                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.1
 
                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
 
 
  As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of
our reports dated January 27, 1998, included in this Form 10-K, into the
Company's previously filed Registration Statement Form S-3 (No. 33-28942);
Registration Statement Form S-8 (No. 33-28939); Registration Statement Form S-
8 (No. 33-29163); Registration Statement Form S-8 (No. 33-32824); Registration
Statement Form S-3 (No. 33-35988); Registration Statement Form S-8 (No. 33-
37377), Registration Statement Form S-3 (No. 33-49918); Registration Statement
Form S-8 (No. 33-71114); and Registration Statement Form S-8 (33-58335);
Registration Statement Form S-4 (33-60391); Registration Statement Form S-8
(33-63699); Registration Statement Form S-8 (333-25509); Registration
Statement Form S-8 (333-25667); and Registration Statement Form S-8 (333-
29835).
 
                                       Arthur Andersen LLP
 
 
Dallas, Texas
March 26, 1998
 
                                       1
115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 831 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 120 West Pike Street in Canonsburg, Pennsylvania, as the ‘‘Police Officer Scott Bashioum Post Office 

Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 831 ES

1 SECTION 1. POLICE OFFICER SCOTT BASHIOUM POST OF2 FICE BUILDING. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 120 West Pike Street in 

5 Canonsburg, Pennsylvania, shall be known and designated 

6 as the ‘‘Police Officer Scott Bashioum Post Office Build7 ing’’. 

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

10 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

11 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Police Officer Scott 

12 Bashioum Post Office Building’’. 

Passed the Senate June 13, 2017. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 831 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostScott Bashioum Post Office Building’’. Canonsburg, Pennsylvania, as the ‘‘Police Officer al Service located at 120 West Pike Street in
#### 19.1502 Applicability.

The procedures in this subpart apply to all Federal agencies that employ one or more contracting officers.
### §1382. Acceptance and administration of gifts for immigration integration grants program

The Director of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services is authorized in fiscal year 2017, and in each fiscal year thereafter, to solicit, accept, administer, and utilize gifts, including donations of property, for the purpose of providing an immigrant integration grants program and related activities to promote citizenship and immigrant integration: Provided, That all sums received under this subsection shall be deposited in a separate account in the general fund of the Treasury to be known as the "Citizenship Gift and Bequest Account": Provided further, That all funds deposited into the Citizenship Gift and Bequest Account shall remain available until expended, and shall be available in addition to any funds appropriated or otherwise made available for an immigrant integration grants program or other activities to promote citizenship and immigrant integration.

(Pub. L. 115–31, div. F, title IV, §404(c), May 5, 2017, 131 Stat. 422.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act, 2017, and also as part of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2017, and not as part of the Immigration and Nationality Act which comprises this chapter.
115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 931 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 4910 Brighton Boulevard in Denver, Colorado, 

as the ‘‘George Sakato Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 931 ES

1 SECTION 1. GEORGE SAKATO POST OFFICE. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

3 Postal Service located at 4910 Brighton Boulevard in 

4 Denver, Colorado, shall be known and designated as the 

5 ‘‘George Sakato Post Office’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘George Sakato Post 

10 Office’’. 

Passed the Senate March 7, 2018. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 931 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostOffice’’. Denver, Colorado, as the ‘‘George Sakato Post al Service located at 4910 Brighton Boulevard in
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Donald C. Wood, the President and Chief Executive Officer of Federal Realty Investment Trust (the Company), has executed this certification in connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange
Commission of the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 (the Report). The undersigned hereby certifies that:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|              |  |  |  |                                                                             
|------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|              |  | 
|July 30, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/ DONALD C. WOOD                                                          
|              |  |  |  | Donald C. Wood,                                                             
|              |  |  |  | President, Chief Executive Officer and Trustee (Principal Executive Officer)