alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6,1

Eastern Division

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:12−cr−00109

Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman

Heon Seok Lee

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Wednesday, October 21, 2015:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman: as to Heon Seok

Lee (1); Status hearing held on 10/21/2015. Motion hearing held on 10/21/2015.

Defendant's motion to modify conditions of release [36] is granted. The defendant, Heon

Seok Lee, is placed on Home Detention with Location Monitoring as of today's date. The

defendant is required to abide by all restrictions of Home Detention and is approved to do

the following outside of the home: exercise up to three (3) times a week for up to three (3)

hours per day at a specified location, allowed out of his home once per week to purchase

personal effects, allowed out of his home for up to eight (8) hours to celebrate the

following holidays: Thanksgiving, Christmas Eve, Christmas, New Years Eve, and New

Years Day. All of the above must be approved in advance by Pretrial Services. In

addition, the defendant is allowed to be in the home alone and is allowed to leave the

home alone for the reasons set forth above as long as approved in advance by Pretrial

Services. If the defendant is leaving the home not in the company of his Third Party

Custodians, his mode of transportation must be identified to pretrial services. The

defendants Third Party Custodians, Ui Jong Hwang and Janet Hwang, the defendants aunt

and uncle, may be away from the home for up to two nights, as long as advance notice is

given to Pretrial Services and a responsible person who can be contacted is named to

pre−trial. With the assistance of an interpreter, Mr. and Mrs. Hwang were questioned and

admonished in open court regarding their responsibilities in regards to the modified

conditions. The modifications are over the vigorous objections of the Government. Pretrial

motions due by 12/7/2015. Status hearing set for 12/9/2015 at 09:45 AM. Defendant's

presence is waived at the next hearing. Mailed notice (rth, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

Case: 1:12-cr-00109 Document #: 42 Filed: 10/21/15 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:143
For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:12-cr-00109 Document #: 42 Filed: 10/21/15 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:144
A Desktop Guide To Social Security And SSI Work Incentives 

Special rules make it possible for people with disabilities receiving Social Security or Supplemental Security Income (Smonthly payments and Medicare or Medicaid. Social Security calls these rules “work incentives.” Following are the rules For more copies or additional materials on work incentives, contact any Social Security office.

Social Security Supplemental Security I

Trial Work Period—A period of nine months (not necessarily consecutive) during which the earnings of a Social Security beneficiary who is blind or disabled will not affect his or her benefit. (The nine months of work must occur within a 60-month period.) Extended Period of Eligibility—For at least three years after a successful trial work period, a Social Security beneficiary who is blind or disabled may receive a disability benefit for any month that his/her earnings are below the substantial gainful activity level (in 2000, $700 for people who are disabled, $1,170 for people who are blind).Continuation of Medicare—If Social Security disability payments stop because a person has earnings at or above the substantial gainful activity level, but the person is still disabled, Medicare can continue for at least 39 months after the trial work period. After that, the person can buy Medicare coverage by paying a monthly premium.Impairment-Related Work Expenses—Certain expenses for things a person with a disability needs because of his/her impairment in order to work may be deducted when counting earnings to determine if the person is performing substantial gainful activity.Recovery During Vocational Rehabilitation—If a person recovers while participating in a vocational rehabilitation program that is likely to lead to becoming self-supporting, benefits may continue until the program ends. Special Rules For Persons Who Are Blind—Several special rules apply to working beneficiaries who are blind. For example, in 2000, they can earn up to $1,170 before their benefits are affected. 

Continuation Of SSI—Working SSI recipmay continue to receive payments until climits.Continuation Of Medicaid Eligibility—Mrecipients who are blind or disabled and ecannot afford similar medical care and dework.Plan For Achieving Self-Support—An SSabled may set aside income and resourceachieving self-support (PASS). Impairment-Related Work Expenses—Cperson with a disability needs because of hwork may be deducted when counting earis eligible and to figure the payment amouare blind, the work expenses need not be Recovery During Vocational Rehabilitatioparticipating in a vocational rehabilitation to becoming self-supporting, benefits maends. Sheltered Workshop Payments—Pay recis treated as earned income, regardless of wfor other purposes. This enables Social Sesheltered workshop employee's earnings payment. Students With Disabilities—Tuition, booto getting an education may not be countego to school or are in a training program

Social Security's

Toll-Free Number

1-800-772-1213

TTY: 1-800-325-0778

Internet: www.ssa.gov
Mr. Ramie H. Griffin Opinion ~No. WW-737 CFimin&District Attorney Beaumont,

Texas Re: Whether a sheriffreceiving notificatioobyletter from another law enforcementofficer that there is a warrant outstanding

for a certain person,

has ~authority

to arrest said person ,before he receives

the outstanding

warrant or before it is .trahsmitted to him by telegram as providedin ArtideS 225, 227, Dear Mr. Griffin: 228, and 229, C.C.P.

You ask the following question:
"If the Sheriffof Jefferson ,County receives notification

by letter from the Sheriffof another County, or any other law enforcement agency, in anotherCounty,

in the State of Texas, that there is a warrant outstanding for a certain

person (giving the warrantnumber,,and description.of

the of- ,fense),,does

the Sheriffof Jefferson Countyhave authority

to.arrest

the persondescribed in such notice,before

he receives

the outstanding

warrant or before the warrant is transmitted to him by telegraph~asprovided in Articles 225, 227, 228 and 229, c.c.P.V There are two types of arrests, arrest under a warrantand,&- rest withouta warrant. Your question and this opinion

are only concerned with an attempted

arrest under a warrant. Article 243, Texas Code of CriminalProcedure reads as follows:
'3 executing

a warrant of arrest, it shall always be made knownto the accused underwhat authority the arrest is made; and, if requested, the warrant shallbe exhibited

to him. O.C. 231 (Emphasis added)
The Court of Criminal Appeals, in Cartesv. State, 161 S.W.2d 495, 498 (19421, said of this provision:Mr. Rainie H. Griffin,

Page 2. (WW-737)

"It occursto us ,that where the evidence fails to show that this provision of said article

was complied

with, the presumption obtaihsthat the arrest was illegal;

. . .' Unless the arresting officer,can

produceevidence

that he complied with Article 243, the arrest ~~111 be presumedillegal. The officer must have awarrant with him at the time he mkes the arrest. Mere notification

,that a warrant

sexists is not sufficient

as the arresting

officer cannotthen meet the requirements of Art. 243, Texas Code of Criminal Procedure.
SUMMARY

A sheriff

receiving

notificatiohbyletter from another law enforcement officer

that there is a warrant outstand.ing for a certain person,

has no authority

to arrest said personunder that warrantbeforehe receives

the outstanding

warrant or before it is transmitted

to him by telegram

as providedin Articles225, 227, 228,and 229, C.C.P.
Yours very truly,
WILL WIISON .Attorney

Generalof Texas

Cecil Cammack,

Jr. Assistant CC:aw
APPROVED:
OPINIONCOMMlTl'ER: Riley Eugene Fletcher, Chairman Marvin Brown CharlesD. Cabsniss Iola.Wilcox RobertWalls
RRVIRWED

FORTREAlTORNEX GENERAL BY: W.V. Geppert
Mark E. McKinnon Mark.McKinnon@dentons.com

D 703.336.8708

Dentons US LLP

1676 International Drive • Penthouse

McLean, VA 22102

United States

T 703.336.8800

F 703.336.8750

Salans FMC SNR Denton

McKenna Long

dentons.com

July 24, 2015

U.S. Department of Transportation

Docket Management System

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE

Washington, DC 20590

Re: Petition for Third Amendment to Exemption No. 11241 Issued to Phoenix Air 

UNMANNED, LLC Pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Reform Act (Docket No. FAA2014-0692)

To Whom it May Concern:

Phoenix Air UNMANNED, LLC was issued Exemption No. 11241 on March 26, 2015 (hereinafter 

"the Exemption"), allowing operation of UAS for aerial data collection. The Exemption was subsequently 

amended to permit closed set motion picture and television filming. Phoenix Air UNMANNED now 

presents this petition seeking an amendment to Exemption 11241 to permit the operation of the Intuit 

Aerial Aerigon for both aerial data collection and closed set motion picture and television production.

If requested, Phoenix Air UNMANNED will submit a revised copy of the UAS Operations Manual 

and Closed Set Motion Picture and Television Operations Manual under separate cover pursuant to 14 

C.F.R. § 11.35(b), as the materials contain confidential commercial and/or proprietary information that 

has not and will not share with others. Additionally, the document contains operating conditions and 

procedures that are not generally available to the public and are protected from release under the 

Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552 et seq. All operations of the additional UAS will be in full 

compliance with the terms of Exemption. 

Phoenix Air UNMANNED believes that an amendment adding the Intuit Aerial Aerigon to the 

Exemption is in the public's interest as it would reduce hazards and emissions associated with alternate 

use of manned aircraft to conduct similar aerial data collection. The Intuit Aerial Aerigon has a maximum 

take-off weight of under 55 pounds and has a maximum airspeed of under 30 knots. The aircraft has 

advanced safety features such as a lost link fail-safe mode and an advanced return to home system

Moreover, the FAA has already found that the size, weight, design, and performance 

specifications of the Intuit Aerial Aerigon conform to the requirements of Section 333 of the FAA 

Modernization and Reform Act of 2012. See Exemption 11541A, issued to Vision Pictures, LLC on July 

21, 2015. Accordingly, the requested amendment should be granted.
July 24, 2015

Page 2

Salans FMC SNR Denton

McKenna Long

dentons.com

As this is an amendment to an existing exemption seeking the addition of a supplementary UAS 

model, Phoenix Air UNMANNED respectfully submits that good cause exists so that notice does not 

need to be published in the Federal Register for the requested amendment.

If you have any questions, or need any additional information to process the requested 

amendment to the Exemption, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned. 

Very truly yours, 

Mark E. McKinnon 

 

Counsel for Phoenix Air UNMANNED
**UNITEDSTATES**

**SECURITIES AND EXCHANGECOMMISSION**

**Washington****, D.C. 20549**

** **

**Form10-K**

** **

[X]    ANNUALREPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

** **

For thefiscal year ended December 31, 2008

** **

or

** **

[ ]   TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACTOF 1934

** **

For thetransition period  _________to _________

** **

Commission file number0-10673

** **

**REALESTATE ASSOCIATES LIMITED III**

(Exactname of registrant as specified in its charter)

** **

** **

55Beattie Place, PO Box 1089

Greenville, South Carolina 29602

(Addressof principal executive offices)

** **

Registrant's telephonenumber, (864) 239-1000

** **

Securities registeredpursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

** **

None

** **

Securities registeredpursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

** **

Unitsof Limited Partnership Interests

(Title ofclass)

** **

Indicate by check mark ifthe registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of theSecurities Act. Yes [ ] No [X]

 

Indicate by check mark ifthe registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)of the Act. Yes [ ] No [X]

 

Indicate by check markwhether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file suchreports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90days. Yes [X] No [ ]

 

Indicate by check mark ifdisclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (229.405of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the bestof the registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statementsincorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to thisForm 10-K. [X]

 

Indicate by check markwhether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, anon-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of“large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company”in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

 

Indicate by check markwhether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).Yes [ ] No [X]

 

State the aggregate marketvalue of the voting and non-voting partnership interests held by non-affiliatescomputed by reference to the price at which the partnership interests were lastsold, or the average bid and asked prices of such partnership interests as ofthe last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscalquarter. No market exists for the limited partnership interests of theRegistrant, and, therefore, no aggregate market value can bedetermined.

 

**DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BYREFERENCE**

**None**
#### In the Matter of the Claim of George Allen, Appellant-Respondent, v. Kenneth A. Fisher et al., Appellants-Respondents, and New World Building Corporation et al., Respondents. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent. In the Matter of the Claim of Buren Phillips, Appellant-Respondent, v. Kenneth A. Fisher et al., Appellants-Respondents, and Charles E. Vagele et al., Respondents. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.

Order entered October 13, 1960 is hereby vacated, without costs.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Three-Five
Systems, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, Jeffrey D. Buchanan, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer,
Secretary, Treasurer, and Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
78m(a) or 78o(d)); and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company. /s/ Jeffrey D.
BuchananJeffrey D. BuchananExecutive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer,
Secretary, Treasurer, and Director Date: May 7, 2004
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Theodore G. Shively, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed. (See *People v Esteves,*41 NY2d 826, 827.) (Appeal from judgment of Cattaraugus County Court—murder, second degree.) Present—Cardamone, J. P., Dillon, Hancock, Jr., Schnepp and Witmer, JJ.
#### Daniel Zampella et al., Doing Business as D & C Construction Company, Respondents, v Plaza at Latham Association, Doing Business as Latham Plaza, Inc., Appellant.

— Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, entered December 23, 1977 in Schenectady County, upon the decision of an arbitration panel. On December 1, 1975, plaintiffs contracted with *1033defendant to perform snowplowing services at defendant’s parking lot for a certain sum, payable in monthly installments. Pursuant to this contract a 1-*Vi%*monthly interest rate would be charged defendant on the late payment of a monthly installment. Following an alleged default by defendant in its installment payments, plaintiff commenced an action to recover the sums due under the contract. The parties subsequently stipulated to place the matter before the Schenectady County Arbitration Panel. On November 10, 1977, the decision of the arbitrators in favor of plaintiffs was filed in the county clerk’s office and a judgment based on the award was entered on December 23, 1977. Defendant here brings an appeal, dated January 12, 1978, from said judgment alleging that the contract in question should be declared void as usurious. By stipulating to arbitration before the Schenectady County Arbitration Panel, the parties chose that the matter be governed by the Rules Governing Compulsory Arbitration of the Judicial Conference (Administrative Board) (22 NYCRR Part 28). According to these rules, unless a demand is made for a trial *de novo,*or the award vacated, the award becomes final and judgment may be entered thereon (22 NYCRR 28.11). A demand for a trial *de novo*must be made within 20 days after the award is filed (22 NYCRR 28.12). A. motion to vacate the award must be made within 20 days after the award is served upon the moving party (22 NYCRR 28.13). The record fails to show that either a demand for a trial *de novo*or a motion to vacate the award were timely made. We are of the view that defendant, having chosen the procedure whereby the matter was to be determined, is bound by the agreement *(Matter of Wilkins,*169 NY 494). Consequently, if defendant was dissatisfied with the arbitrators’ award, it was required to demand a trial *de novo*or move to vacate the award (22 NYCRR 28.12, 28.13). Since defendant failed to do either in the time prescribed, it is the opinion of this court that the appeal must be dismissed (see *Matter of Bond [Shubert],*264 App Div 484, affd 290 NY 901). Appeal dismissed, with costs. Mahoney, P. J., Sweeney, Staley, Jr., Main and Herlihy, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CURRENCY> 0
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          48,682
<SECURITIES>                                   499,148
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               548,880
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 651,630
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    109,356
<COMMON>                                         4,851
<OTHER-SE>                                   (331,779)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   651,630
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               116,273
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                70,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (248,771)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (248,771)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (418,552)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.04)
        

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 21.1**

 

**BANCTEC, INC.**

Founded: 1972

Incorporated (Delaware): January 2, 1987

 

 
| **SUBSIDIARY  NAME**                          |   | **PLACE OF****INCORPORATION** |   | **DATE OF****INCORPORATION** |
|-----------------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------|--------|------------------------------|
|                                          |   |                          |   |                         |
| BancTec  (Puerto Rico), Inc.                  |   | Delaware                      |   | February  24, 1988           |
| BancTec  (Export), Inc.                       |   | U.S.  Virgin Islands          |   | January  22, 1990            |
| BTC  International Holdings, Inc.             |   | Delaware                      |   | December  31, 2001           |
| BancTec (Canada), Inc.                        |   | Canada                        |   | June  11, 1986               |
| BancTec Limited                               |   | England                       |   | October  27, 1976            |
| Plexus Europe Limited                         |   | England                       |   | March  28, 1983              |
| Servibanca                                    |   | Chile                         |   | January  18, 1990            |
| BancTec Holding N.V.                          |   | The  Netherlands              |   | May  24, 1991                |
| BancTec A/S                                   |   | Denmark                       |   | January  8, 1971             |
| BancTec Iberica S.A.                          |   | Spain                         |   | April  9, 1981               |
| BancTec AB                                    |   | Sweden                        |   | September  30, 1992          |
| BancTec S.A.                                  |   | France                        |   | December  31, 1990           |
| BancTec GmbH                                  |   | Germany                       |   | December  14, 1976           |
| BancTec B.V.                                  |   | The  Netherlands              |   | June  4, 1991                |
| Recognition  Mexico Holding Inc. (dormant)    |   | Delaware                      |   | September  30, 1994          |
| Recognition  de Mexico S.A. de C.V. (dormant) |   | Mexico                        |   | November  16, 1994           |
| BancTec  Third Party Maintenance, Inc.        |   | Texas                         |   | February  26, 1992           |
| BTC  Ventures, Inc.                           |   | Delaware                      |   | November  6, 2002            |
| BTI  Technologies, L.P.                       |   | Texas                         |   | November  7, 2002            |

 

----
#### 1845.607 Scrap.
#### 1901.103 Applicability.

Except where a deviation is specifically authorized in accordance with subpart 1901.4 or otherwise authorized by law, the FAR and the IAAR govern all the Broadcasting Board of Governors acquisitions within the United States.