alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

ORDER OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE

It appearing that the Hon. Joan Humphrey Lefkow is presiding over MDL 2371 (12 C 6286,

In Re: Unified Messaging Solutions LLC Patent Litigation); and

It further appearing that the cases on the attached list fall within the scope of MDL 2371;

therefore

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that the Clerk is to reassign the cases on the attached list to the

Hon. Joan Humphrey Lefkow.

ENTER:

FOR THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE:

_____________________________________

 Chief Judge James F. Holderman

Dated at Chicago, Illinois this 21st day of August, 2012.

Case: 1:12-cv-01491 Document #: 52 Filed: 08/21/12 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:696
Case Case Title Judge

12cv1487 Unified Messaging Solutions v Discover Financial Services Castillo 

12cv1488 Unified Messaging Solutions v Groupon, Inc. Holderman

12cv1489 Unified Messaging Solutions v Orbitz, LLC Pallmeyer

12cv1490 Unified Messaging Solutions v Southwest Airlines Gottschall

12cv1491 Unified Messaging Solutions v UBS Financial Services Kennelly

12cv1492 Unified Messaging Solutions v United Air Lines, Inc. Coleman

12cv1493 Unified Messaging Solutions v Walgreen Co. Lefkow

12cv1494 Unified Messaging Solutions v Northern Illinois Gas Company Leinenweber

Case: 1:12-cv-01491 Document #: 52 Filed: 08/21/12 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:697
SECTION 1: Ratio and Ratio Terms

DRAFT

Appendix A: Ratio Methodology for Proprietary Institutions

Primary Reserve Ratio Adjusted Equity

Total Expenses and Losses

Equity Ratio Modified Equity

Modified Assets

Net Income Ratio Income Before Taxes

Total Revenues and 

Gains

Definitions:

Adjusted Equity = (total owner's equity) - (intangible assets) - (unsecured related-party receivables)* - (net property, plant and equipment)** + (postemployment and defined benefit pension liabilities) + (all debt obtained for long-term purposes, not to exceed total net property, plant and equipment)***

Total Expenses and Losses (excludes income tax, discontinued operations, or change in accounting principle), less any losses on investments****, postemployment and defined benefit pension plans, and annuities. (Total expenses include the nonservice component of net periodic pension and other 

post-employment plan expenses that are classified as non-operating).

Modified Equity = (total owner's equity) - (intangible assets) - (unsecured related-party receivables)

Modified Assets = (total assets) - (intangible assets) - (unsecured related-party receivables)

Income Before Taxes is taken directly from the audited financial statement

Total Revenues and Gains = (total operating revenues) + (non-operating revenue and gains). Investment gains should be recorded net of investment losses.

Revenues and gains does not include discontinued operations not considered an operating expense for reporting purposes, or change in accounting principle

* Unsecured related party receivables as required at 34 C.F.R 668.23(d)

** The value of property, plant and equipment includes construction in progress and lease right-of-use assets, and is net of accumulated depreciation/amortization.

*** Debt obtained for long-term purposes, not to exceed total net property, plant and equipment includes lease liabilities for lease right-of-use assets and the shortterm portion of the debt, up to the amount of net property, plant and equipment. If an institution wishes to include the debt obtained through long term lines of 

credit in total debt obtained for long term purposes, the institution must include a disclosure in the financial statements that the lines of credit exceed twelve 

months and were used to fund capitalized assets (i.e. property, plant and equipment or capitalized expenditures per Generally Accepted Accounting Principles). The 

disclosure must include the issue date, term, nature of capitalized amounts and amounts capitalized. Institutions that do not include long term lines of credit in total 

debt obtained for long term purposes do not need to provide the additional disclosure. The debt obtained for long-term purposes will be limited to only those 
amounts disclosed in the financial statements that were used to fund capitalized assets. Any amount from long term lines of credit used to fund operations must be 

excluded from debt obtained for long-term purposes.

****For investments, any loss is the net loss for investments.
#### (A) The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. James V. Tangredi, Appellant. (B) William G. Roby, Plaintiff, v. City of Watertown, Defendant. City of Watertown, Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation, Third-Party Defendant-Respondent, and New York Telephone Company, Third-Party Defendant. (C) William G. Roby, Plaintiff, v. City of Watertown, Defendant. City of Watertown, Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation, Third-Party Defendant, and New York Telephone Company, Third-Party Defendant-Respondent. (D) Union National Bank, Respondent, v. Signore Tool & Die Co., Inc., et al., Appellants, and Burrell Metal Products Corp., Respondent.

[In each action] Order of dismissal for failure to prosecute entered pursuant to rule X of the Rules of the Appellate Division, Fourth Department.
# & Memorandu m

U.S . Departmen t o f Transportatio n Offic e o f th e Secretar

y o f Transportatio n Subject : Notic e of

Communicatio n i

n Docket : Date: FAA-2010-010 9 AP R1 2 201 0 Petitio n fo r

Waive r o f tli e Term s o

f th e Orde r Limitin g Sch^ule dOperaticun^ t LaGuardi aAirpor t From : ( Qm/gtatFoiliMtott

p 1 "' ' ^^^^Si/ /

Repl y t o

, D^u K Assistan t Secretar y fo r Aviatio n " ' ° ' ' J ^ j an d Internationa

l Affairs _ ^ d ^ To : Chief , Docket s - ' " ~ I n accordanc e w^it

h Departmen t

rule s (1 4 CF

RPar t 300) , I a mreportin g th e followin g commurucation . O n Apri l 9,2010 , durin g a n aviatio n roun dtabl e discussio n a t Stewar t Internationa l Airpor t

tha t wa s attende db y Secretar y LaHoo dan dmyself. Captai n Dou g Ralp h o

f th e Airlin e Pilot s Associatio n an dJame s Va n Woer t o f Delt aAi r Line s expresse dthei r

suppor t fo r th e join t reques t submitte d b y Delt aAi r

line s an dU S Airway s fo r awaive r fro mth e prohibitio n o n purchasin g operatin g authorization s a t LaGuardi aAirport . Captai n Ralp h als o expresse dhi s hop e tha t th e Departmen t

woul dhandl e th e proceedin g expeditiousl y an daske dabou t it s status . Secretar y LaHoo d responde dthat , becaus e th e matte r wa s unde r

activ e consideration , h e coul dno t commen t

upo n an y aspec t

an dh e note dtha t

an y discussio n o

f th e cas e a t

thi s tim e woul db e inappropriate . Pleas e plac e thi s memorandu mi n th e appropriat e fil e an di n th e Docket .
#### Charleston and Western Carolina Railway Company *v.*Union Warehouse and Compress Company.

November 15, 1912.

Voucher to defend action. Before Judge Hammond. Biclnnond superior court. September 9, 1911.

*W. K. Miller,*for plaintiff in error. *W. H. Barrett,*contra.

Atkinson, J.

1. Where a defendant may have a remedy over against another, and vouches him into court by giving notice of the pendency of a suit, the judgment rendered therein will be conclusive upon the party vouched, as to the amount and right of the plaintiff to recover. Civil Code, § 5821.

2. The judgment in such a case is not An adjudication of the question whether the primary defendant is entitled to recover against his vouchee, upon a suit brought by him against the latter after a recovery has been had in the first action.

3. Where a widow brought against a railway company an action to recover damages for the negligent homicide of her husband, and alleged as one ground of negligence the maintenance of a platform dangerously near a railroad track, and the defendant served a compress company, alleged to be the owner of such platform, with a copy of the petition and a written avouehment, stating that the suit was proceeding upon the theory that there was negligence in the maintenance of the platform of the compress company, by reason of the protrusion of one of the sleepers so as to be too close to the railway track, notifying the compress company of the suit, and vouching it to defend the same, no provision of law exists by which the vouchee can, by petition to the presiding judge, have the question of its liability over determined in advance of the original suit, and obtain an order declaring the vouchee to be relieved from any . obligation to defend the suit, and that such avouehment is null and void, and setting it aside and dismissing the vouchee from any participation in the suit.

*Judgment reversed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
Exhibit 32.2

 

Certification of the Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

 

I, Michael S. Sarner, Chief Financial Officer of Capital Southwest Corporation, certify that, to my knowledge:

|  | 1. |  | The Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2016, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 7, 2017 (“accompanied report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--|----|--|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | 2. |  | The information contained in the accompanied report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of Capital Southwest Corporation. |
|--|----|--|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

|                         |   |                    |
|------------------------------|--------|-------------------------|
| Date:  February 7, 2017 | By:    | /s/ Michael S. Sarner   |
|                         |   | Michael S. Sarner       |
|                         |   | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 22 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. CON. RES. 22

 Expressing the sense of Congress on the use of the Intergovernmental 
     Personnel Act Mobility Program and the Department of Defense 
Information Technology Exchange Program to obtain personnel with cyber 
          skills and abilities for the Department of Defense.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 20, 2017

  Mr. Rounds submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
 Expressing the sense of Congress on the use of the Intergovernmental 
     Personnel Act Mobility Program and the Department of Defense 
Information Technology Exchange Program to obtain personnel with cyber 
          skills and abilities for the Department of Defense.

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring),

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This concurrent resolution may be cited as the ``Whole of Society 
Cyber Personnel Cooperation Resolution of 2017''.

SEC. 2. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON USE OF INTERGOVERNMENTAL PERSONNEL ACT 
              MOBILITY PROGRAM AND DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE INFORMATION 
              TECHNOLOGY EXCHANGE PROGRAM TO OBTAIN PERSONNEL WITH 
              CYBER SKILLS AND ABILITIES FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE.

    It is the sense of Congress that--
            (1) the Department of Defense should fully use the 
        Intergovernmental Personnel Act Mobility Program (IPAMP) and 
        the Department of Defense Information Technology Exchange 
        Program (ITEP) to obtain cyber personnel across the Government 
        by leveraging cyber capabilities found at the State and local 
        government level and in the private sector in order to meet the 
        needs of the Department for cybersecurity professionals; and
            (2) the Department should implement at the earliest 
        practicable date a strategy that includes policies and plans to 
        fully use such programs to obtain such personnel for the 
        Department.
                                 <all>
```
17.604 Identifying management and operating contracts. A management and operating contract is characterized both by its purpose (see 17.601) and by the special relationship it creates between Government and contractor. The following criteria can generally be applied in identifying management and operating contracts: ( a ) Government-owned or -controlled facilities must be utilized; for instance, ( 1 ) in the interest of national defense or mobilization readiness,
( 2 ) to perform the agency's mission adequately, or
( 3 ) because private enterprise is unable or unwilling to use its own facilities for the work.
( b ) Because of the nature of the work, or because it is to be performed in Government facilities, the Government must maintain a special, close relationship with the contractor and the contractor's personnel in various important areas (e.g., safety, security, cost control, site conditions).
( c ) The conduct of the work is wholly or at least substantially separate from the contractor's other business, if any.
( d ) The work is closely related to the agency's mission and is of a long-term or continuing nature, and there is a need ( 1 ) to ensure its continuity and
( 2 ) for special protection covering the orderly transition of personnel and work in the event of a change in contractors.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of Lubys, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended November 17, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, K. Scott Gray, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                        |  |  |  |     |  |                                                                                
|----------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: December 20, 2010 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ K. Scott Gray                                                              
|                        |  |  |  |     |  | K. Scott Gray                                                                  
|                        |  |  |  |     |  | Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer



34
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice: 11324]

Acting under the authority of and in accordance with section 1(a)(ii)(A) of Executive Order 13224 of September 23, 2001, as amended by Executive Order 13268 of July 2, 2002, Executive Order 13284 of January 23, 2003, and Executive Order 13886 of September 9, 2019, I hereby determine that the person known as Ansarallah, also known as Ansar Allah; also known as Ansarullah; also known as Partisans of God; and also known as Supporters of God, is a foreign person who has committed or has attempted to commit, or poses a significant risk of committing, or has participated in training to commit, acts of terrorism that threaten the security of U.S. nationals or the national security, foreign policy, or economy of the United States.

Consistent with the determination in section 10 of Executive Order 13224 that prior notice to persons determined to be subject to the Order who might have a constitutional presence in the United States would render ineffectual the blocking and other measures authorized in the Order because of the ability to transfer funds instantaneously, I determine that no prior notice needs to be provided to any person subject to this determination who might have a constitutional presence in the United States, because to do so would render ineffectual the measures authorized in the Order.

                    This notice shall be published in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                

Dated: January 12, 2021.

Michael R. Pompeo,

Secretary of State.

[FR Doc. 2021-01000 Filed 1-15-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-AD-P
#### 217.7702 Contract clause.

Use the clause at 252.217-7028, Over and Above Work, in solicitations and contracts containing requirements for over and above work, except as provided for in subpart 217.71.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 5.0.3

Eastern Division

MWF Foundation, Inc.

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:12−cv−02208

Honorable Virginia M. Kendall

George Sepero, et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Monday, November 19, 2012:

 MINUTE entry before Honorable Virginia M. Kendall:Pursuant to FRCP 41

(a)(2), plaintiff voluntarily moves to dismisswithout prejudice this action as to defendants

George Sepero, Carmelo Provenzano, and Joseph D. Clark.Mailed notice(tsa, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:12-cv-02208 Document #: 25 Filed: 11/19/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:101
SERVED: DECEMBER 17, 2014 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC
IN THE MATTER OF SEA HAWK AIR, INC. DOCKETNO. FAA-2014-0865 (Civil Penalty Action)

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 2011NM730060) has been assigned to Administrative LawJudge Richard C. Goodwin. All future pleadings and other communications regarding this proceeding shall be served onthe Judge, the FAAHearing Docket, and the otherpersons onthe attached Service List. 

# a:sv/
ChiefAdministrative Law . ···d.ge Attachment
- Service ListSERVICE LIST -BY U.S. MAIL ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

### Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000 1



### John 

### L. Wright, Respondent's Counsel The Law Office ofJohn L. Wright, P.C. 11705 Airport Way, Sriite 307 Broomfield, CO 80021 TEL: 303-747-4000 FAX: 303-747-4001 ONE COPY



### Craig Wm. Black, Complainant's Counsel Federal Aviation Administration Office ofthe Regional Counsel, AAL-7 222 West 7th Avenue, Box 14 Anchorage, AL 99513-7587 TEL: 907-271-3570 FAX: 907-271-2800 The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin,AdministrativeLawJudge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-5121 StaffAssistant FAX: 202-366-7536 DocketNo. FAA-2014-0865 (Civil Penalty Action)

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 IndependenceAvenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

### 2
#### 1509.500 Scope of subpart.

This subpart establishes EPA policy and procedures for identifying, evaluating, and resolving organizational conflicts of interest. EPA's policy is to avoid, neutralize, or mitigate organizational conflicts of interest. If EPA is unable to neutralize or mitigate the effects of a potential conflict of interest, EPA will disqualify the prospective contractor or will terminate the contract when potential or actual conflicts are identified after award.

[49 FR 8839, Mar. 8, 1984; 49 FR 24734, June 15, 1984]
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

## IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-60353 MICHAEL E. STEWART, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. J. E. BORRIES, INC., Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi USDC No. 1:06-CV-187 Before JOLLY, DAVIS, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * 

### AFFIRMED. See 5 TH 

### C IR

### . R. 47.6. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## F I L E D February 9, 2009 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk