alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Prospective Student: Any individual who has contacted, or who has been contacted by an eligible institution or its contractor, vendor, or any other agent or representative of the institution, related to potential enrollment in one or more of the institution’s GE programs.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF THE PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Chase General Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Barry M. Yantis, President and Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|    |  |                                                                      
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------
|    | 
|By: |  | /s/ Barry M. Yantis                                                  
|    |  | Barry M. Yantis President, Chief Executive Officer, November 12, 2008
Stalking Recommendations

DEFINITION

“course of conduct” – two or more behaviors (see Model Stalking Statute description) 

“would cause” – victim does not actually need to experience distress or fear

- reasonable person standard should be applied by officials to define the reported 

pattern of behavior as stalking

“reasonable person” – adopt Model Stalking Statute language and include that the 

standard would be framed the perspective of a reasonable person with “similar identity”

to that of the victim

“substantial” (to-be-defined in larger committee)

“emotional distress” – adopt Model Stalking Statute language

COUNTING

Recommendation is that one incident of stalking can contain a whole pattern of 

behaviors over time as experienced by one victim

- new stalking incident may be counted after an official intervention has 

occurred (term to-be-defined)

o potentially count significant separation of time between behaviors as a 

new incident (ex: passage of summer break without incident would lead to 

new count with the new school year)

GEOGRAPHY

Recommendation is that only one behavior, within the course of stalking conduct, needs 

to occur on Clery geography to trigger reporting requirements

- Stalking should not be forced into the campus geography reporting given: (1)

its unique status as a Clery crime requiring a course of conduct to even be 

counted as a single incident; and (2) it must address electronic forms of stalking

that do not always have a set geographical home (ex: mobile devices)

Open Issue

Determine whether hierarchical rule applies within VAWA crimes and if so determine 

where stalking falls given its high correlation with other serious felonies.
1

2184117v.1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

HSBC BANK USA, NATIONAL

ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE FOR

FREMONT HOME LOAN TRUST 2005-A,

MORTGAGE-BACKED CERTIFICATES,

SERIES 2005-A,

Plaintiff,

vs.

AMY IMMERMAN,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 1:12-cv-1786

Judge John Z. Lee

Plaintiff’s Motion for Entry of Judgment

Plaintiff, HSBC BANK USA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE FOR

FREMONT HOME LOAN TRUST 2005-A, MORTGAGE-BACKED CERTIFICATES,

SERIES 2005-A (“Trustee”), respectfully moves for an entry of judgment pursuant to the

February 4, 2016 Court Order, and states as follows:

1. On March 11, 2012, the Trustee filed a Complaint to Foreclose Mortgage. [Dkt.

1].

2. On September 6, 2013, Immerman filed her answer, affirmative defense and

counterclaim. [Dkt. 43].

3. On November 15, 2013, the Trustee filed its motion to strike affirmative defense

and dismiss counterclaim. [Dkt. 61].

4. On July 15, 2014, this Court granted the Trustee’s motion to strike affirmative

defense, but denied its motion to dismiss counterclaim. [Dkt. 72].
2

2184117v.1

5. On March 20, 2015, the Trustee filed its motion for summary judgment on its

foreclosure claim and Immerman’s counterclaim. [Dkt. 90].

6. On October 15, 2015, this Court issued an order stating the Court will rule on the

Trustee’s motion for summary judgment without Immerman’s response because the deadline for

Immerman to file a response has expired. [Dkt. 112].

7. On February 4, 2016, this Court granted the Trustee’s motion for summary

judgment [Dkt. 115] and issued an order allowing the Trustee to file a motion for judgment along

with supporting documents by February 17, 2016. [Dkt. 114].

8. This motion is made in compliance with the February 4, 2016 order. A proposed

order will be submitted to the Court as required by the Court’s standing order.

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff, HSBC BANK USA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS

TRUSTEE FOR FREMONT HOME LOAN TRUST 2005-A, MORTGAGE-BACKED

CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2005-A, respectfully requests that this Court enter judgment against

Immerman and for all other relief this Court deems fair and just.

DATED: February 9, 2016 Respectfully submitted,

HSBC BANK USA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,

AS TRUSTEE FOR FREMONT HOME LOAN

TRUST 2005-A, MORTGAGE-BACKED

CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2005-A

By: /s/ Simon M. Feng

One of Its Attorneys

Simon Fleischmann (6274929)

Nicholas D. O’Conner (6302672)

Simon M. Feng (6310855)

LOCKE LORD LLP

111 South Wacker Drive

Chicago, Illinois 60606

Telephone: 312-443-0494

Fax: 312-896-6494
3

2184117v.1

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, Simon M. Feng, an attorney, do hereby certify that on February 9, 2016, I

electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of the Court using the electronic case filing

system, which will send electronic notification of such filing to all parties that have appeared in

this action.

By: /s/ Simon M. Feng
#### Joseph Gentkowski and Julia Gentkowski, appellees, v. Pauline Sielski, appellant.

Gen. No. 29,223.

Forcible entry and detainer. Judgment for plaintiffs. Appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Bernard P. Bar asa, Judge, presiding. Heard in the third division of this court for the first district at the March term, 1924.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed February 11, 1925.

D. W. Heffron, for appellant; J. H. Perkinson, of counsel.

Walter T. Stanton, for appellees; Michael W. Kaveney, of counsel.

Mr. Presiding Justice O’Connor

delivered the opinion of the court.
**EXHIBIT 11**
**TELLABS, INC.**
**COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS**             (In millions, except per-share data) 2004  2003  2002  The following chart sets forth thecomputation of loss per share:            Numerator:            Net loss $(29.8) $(241.6) $(313.1)Denominator:            Denominator for basic loss pershare – weighted average sharesoutstanding  420.2   413.1   411.4              Effect of dilutive securities:            Employee stock options and awards  —   —   —    Denominator for diluted loss pershare — adjusted weighted averagesharesoutstanding and assumed conversions  420.2   413.1   411.4              Loss per share, basic and diluted $(0.07) $(0.58) $(0.76)
Under G.A.A.P., dilutive securities are not included in the computation of diluted earnings pershare when a company is in a net loss position. Had dilutive securities been included, weightedaverage shares outstanding would have been 424.7 million, 416.7 million and 414.9 million in 2004,2003 and 2002, respectively.
#### 1552.242-72 Financial administrative contracting officer.

As prescribed in 1542.705 (b), insert the following clause:

# Financial Administrative Contracting Officer (OCT 2000)

(a) A Financial Administrative Contracting Officer (FACO) is responsible for performing certain post-award functions related to the financial aspects of this contract when the EPA is the cognizant federal agency. These functions include the following duties:

(1) Review the contractor's compensation structure and insurance plan.

(2) Negotiate advance agreements applicable to treatment of costs and to Independent Research & Development/Bid and Proposal costs.

(3) Negotiate changes to interim billing rates and establish final indirect cost rates and billing rates.

(4) Prepare findings of fact and issue decisions related to financial matters under the Disputes clause, if appropriate.

(5) In connection with Cost Accounting Standards:

(A) Determine the adequacy of the contractor's disclosure statements;

(B) Determine whether the disclosure statements are in compliance with Cost Accounting Standards and FAR part 31;

(C) Determine the contractor's compliance with Cost Accounting Standards and disclosure statements, if applicable; and

(D) Negotiate price adjustments and execute supplemental agreements under the Cost Accounting Standards clauses at FAR 52.230-3, 52.230-4, and 52.230-5.

(6) Review, approve or disapprove, and maintain surveillance of the contractor's purchasing system.

(7) Perform surveillance, resolve issues, and establish any necessary agreements related to the contractor's cost/schedule control system, including travel policies/procedures, allocation and cost charging methodology, timekeeping and labor distribution policies and procedures, subcontract payment practices, matters concerning relationships between the contractor and its affiliates and subsidiaries, and consistency between bid and accounting classifications.

(8) Review, resolve issues, and establish any necessary agreements related to the contractor's estimating system.

(b) The FACO shall consult with the contracting officer whenever necessary or appropriate and shall forward a copy of all agreements/decisions to the contracting officer upon execution.

(c) The FACO for this contract is:

(End of clause)

[65 FR 58929, Oct. 3, 2000]
|   | · | The                Covered Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)                or                15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;                and                    |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                     |
|   | · | The                information contained in the Covered Report fairly presents, in all                material respects, the financial condition and results of operations                of                the Company. |

| Date:                February 28, 2007 | /s/ William                H.                Spence                                  William                H. SpencePresidentPPL                Electric Utilities Corporation |
|----------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
#### Troop *v.*Marshall.

February 13, 1913.

Complaint. Before Judge Charlton. Chatham superior court. August *2, 1911.*

*John BourJce Jr.,*for plaintiff in error. *W. B. Hewlett,*contra.

Evans, P. J.

1. In a suit upon a contract made by the parties themselves, though some minor preliminary negotiations may have been conducted by an agent of one of the parties, it is not erroneous to omit an instruction relative to the acts of the agent as affecting the contract.

2. The evidence authorized the verdict.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          12,572
<SECURITIES>                                         5
<RECEIVABLES>                                   99,054
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               103,686
<PP&E>                                         116,646
<DEPRECIATION>                                  12,960
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 305,059
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          294,359
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       500,043
<OTHER-SE>                                   (532,993)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   305,059
<SALES>                                        101,228
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               101,228
<CGS>                                          100,195
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  100,195
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               163,287
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               169,259
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,005
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (169,259)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (169,259)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (169,259)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.00)


</TABLE>
#### 1601.106 OMB approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act.

The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980 (Pub. L. 96-511) requires Federal agencies to obtain approval from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) before collecting information from ten or more members of the public. The information collection and recordkeeping requirements contained in this regulation have been approved by the OMB. The following OMB control numbers apply.

| Provision | Control No. |
| --- | --- |
| FEHBAR 1604.705 | 3206-0145 |
| FAR 9.1 | 3206-0145 |

[52 FR 16037, May 1, 1987. Redesignated at 70 FR 31378, June 1, 2005]
#### Louis J. Bollo v Standard Aircraft Equipment Company, Inc.

Motion granted only insofar as to modify the order of this court, entered on November 30, 1978 [65 AD2d 961] so as to provide that the judgment so appealed from is affirmed, without costs and without disbursements, except that the costs of reproducing the record and the cost of the transcript shall be borne equally by the parties. Concur — Kupferman, J. P., Birns, Sandler and Markewich, JJ.
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE 

HEADQUARTERS AIR FORCE FLIGHT STANDARDS AGENCY 

GLOBAL ACCESS FOR AMERICA 

20 Mar 2013 

MEMORANDUM FOR HQ FAA/AGC-10 

FROM: HQ AFFSA/A3OF 

 HQ AFFSA/AJW31AF 

 Bldg 4, Room 107 

 6500 S. MacArthur Blvd 

 Oklahoma City, OK 73169 

SUBJECT: FAR Exemption 130H (Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2001-9409) 

1. FAR Exemption 130A, was granted to the United States Air Force on 24 Mar 65, as amended 

by 130H, it exempts us from the provisions of Section 91.159 (c). Our requirement to conduct 

U-2 operations at or above flight level 600 under the provisions of this exemption remains 

unchanged. We hereby request that the current exemption be renewed IAW 14 CFR Part 11. 

2. As operations under this exemption have been safely conducted for the past forty-five years, 

the Air Force requests your consideration in approving the renewal of this exemption. Please 

contact me with any questions at (405) 734-8424 or e-mail: hqaffsa.a3of@tinker.af.mil. 

 

 ALAN W. MYRICK, Maj, USAF 

 Chief, Aircrew Procedures
Exhibit 32.2

BRIGGS & STRATTON CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

Form 10-Q for Quarterly Period Ended April 1,
2007

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Briggs & Stratton Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 1, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James E. Brenn, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ James E. Brenn     
|James E. Brenn         
|Chief Financial Officer
|May 4, 2007            

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
### -79 -78 -77 -76
39 40 

## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 

### 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 08/23 

## NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

# Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 23 Aug 06

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 39.06 N 76.88 WMeters AGL 

## ★ ■ ■ ■ ■



## ★ ■ ■ ■ ■ 

## ★ ● ●

● ●



## ★ ● ● ● ●
**EXHIBIT
      32.1** 
 SECTION
        906 SARBANES OXLEY CERTIFICATION
 
 CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO
 18
        U.S.C.
        SS.1350,
 AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  In
        connection with the Annual Report of New Century Companies, Inc. (the "Company")
        on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities
        and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David Duquette,
        Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
        pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
        Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 1.The
        Report fully
        complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
        Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 2.The
        information
        contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
        condition and results of operations of
        the
        Company.
  *March
                30,
                2007*
              
              */s/ David Duquette**Name:
                  David Duquette*
                *Title:
                  Chief Executive Officer and**Chief
                  Financial Officer*
 A
        signed
        original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
        authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
        in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
        by Section 906 has been provided to Company and will be retained by Company
        and
        furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
        request.
Prepared by MERRILL CORPORATION www.edgaradvantage.com






Consent of Independent Accountants






We hereby consent to the use, in this Registration Statement on Form N-4 (File No. 333-68551) of our report dated February 23, 2000, relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial
statement schedules of Protective Life Insurance Company and Subsidiaries, which appear in such Registration Statement. We also consent to the use in this registration statement of our report dated
March 20, 2000 on our audits of the financial statements of the Protective Variable Annuity Separate Account, which appears in such Registration Statement. We also consent to the reference to our Firm
under the heading "Experts."






/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP






Birmingham, Alabama

April 24, 2000
#### 1851.205 Contract clause.

When the clause at FAR 52.251-2 is included in a solicitation or contract, also include the clause set forth at 1852.223-76.

[68 FR 43334, July 22, 2003]
#### 201.603 Selection, appointment, and termination of appointment for contracting officers.