alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of the Arbitration between Miguel Simms et al., Appellants, and Liberty Coaches, Inc., Respondent.

— Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on October 17, 1977, unanimously affirmed for the reasons stated by Riccobono, J., at Special Term, without costs and without disbursements. Concur — Birns, J. P., Sandler, Sullivan and Silverman, JJ.
#### In re GUNDERSHEIMER. In the matter of Abraham Gundersheimer. W. K. Hall, for appellant. E. Hymes, for respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

November 6, 1903.)

No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

The National Science Board's Executive Committee (EC), pursuant to National Science Foundation regulations (45 CFR part 614), the National Science Foundation Act, as amended (42 U.S.C. 1862n-5), and the Government in the Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. 552b), hereby gives notice of the scheduling of a teleconference for the transaction of National Science Board business, as follows:

# TIME AND DATE: 

Monday, January 25, 2021 from 1:00-2:00 p.m. EST.

# PLACE: 

This meeting will be held by teleconference through the National Science Foundation, 2415 Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, VA 22314.

      ( print page 6373)    

# STATUS: 

Open.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

Committee Chair's opening remarks; approval of Executive Committee minutes of November 12, 2020; and discuss issues and topics for an agenda of the NSB meeting scheduled for February 23-24, 2021.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

                        Point of contact for this meeting is: Brad Gutierrez, 2415 Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, VA 22314. Telephone: 703/292-7000. To listen to this teleconference, members of the public must send an email to                         *nationalsciencebrd@nsf.gov*                         at least 24 hours prior to the teleconference. The National Science Board Office will send requesters a toll-free dial-in number. Meeting information and updates may be found at                         *http://www.nsf.gov/​nsb/​notices/​.jsp#sunshine.*                         Please refer to the National Science Board website at                         *www.nsf.gov/​nsb*                         for general information.                    

Chris Blair,

Executive Assistant to the National Science Board Office.

[FR Doc. 2021-01412 Filed 1-15-21; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
#### 1652.246-70 FEHB Inspection.

As prescribed in 1646.301, the following clause will be inserted in all FEHB contracts:

# FEHB Inspection (JUL 2005)

(a) The Contracting officer, or an authorized representative of the Contracting officer, has the right to inspect or evaluate the work performed or being performed under the contract, and the premises where the work is being performed, at all reasonable times and in a manner that will not unreasonably delay the work.

(b) The Contractor shall maintain and the Contracting officer, or an authorized representative of the Contracting officer, shall have the right to examine and audit all books and records relating to the contract for purposes of the Contracting officer's determination of the carrier's subcontractor or Large Provider's compliance with the terms of the contract, including its payment (including rebate and other financial arrangements) and performance provisions. The Contractor shall make available at its office at all reasonable times those books and records for examination and audit for the record retention period specified in the Federal Employees Health Benefits Acquisition Regulation (FEHBAR), 48 CFR 1652.204-70. This subsection is applicable to subcontract and Large Provider Agreements with the exception of those that are subject to the “Audits and Records—Negotiation” clause, 48 CFR 52.215-2.

(c) If the Contracting officer, or an authorized representative of the Contracting officer, performs inspection, audit or evaluation on the premises of the carrier, the subcontractor, or the Large Provider, the carrier shall furnish or require the subcontractor or Large Provider to furnish all reasonable facilities for the same and convenient performance of these duties.

(d) The carrier shall insert this clause, including this subsection (d), in all subcontracts for underwriting and claim payments and administrative services and in all Large Provider Agreements and shall substitute “contractor” “Large Provider,” or other appropriate reference for the term “carrier.”

(End of clause)

[70 FR 31384, June 1, 2005, as amended at 71 FR 3016, Jan. 19, 2006]
# July 2020 ED FOIA Log
1516.406 Contract clauses. ( a ) The Contracting Officer shall insert the clause at 1552.216-70, Award fee (MAY 2000), in solicitations and contracts where a cost-plus-award-fee contract is contemplated.
( b ) The Contracting Officer shall insert the provision at 48 CFR 1552.216-75, Base Fee and Award Fee Proposal, in all solicitations which contemplate the award of cost-plus-award-fee contracts. The Contracting Officer shall insert the appropriate percentages.
( c ) The Contracting Officer shall insert the clauses at 1552.216-77, Award Term Incentive, 1552.216-78, Award Term Incentive Plan, and 1552.216-79, Award Term Availability of Funds, in solicitations and contracts when award term incentives are contemplated. The clauses at 1552.216-77 and 1552.216-78 may be used on substantially the same-as basis.
( d ) If the Contracting Officer wishes to use the ratings set forth in the Department of Defense Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System on the contract at hand as the basis for contractor eligibility for an award term incentive, the Contracting Officer shall insert the clause at 1552.216-78.
[60 FR 43404, Aug. 21, 1995, as amended at 64 FR 3876, Jan. 26, 1999; 65 FR 31500, May 18, 2000. Redesignated and amended at 73 FR 1981, Jan. 11, 2008; 78 FR 46290, July 31, 2013; 81 FR 31528, May 19, 2016; 82 FR 33019, July 19, 2017; 85 FR 17506, Mar. 30, 2020]
EXHIBIT 32

Certificate of Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officers



The following statement is being made to the Securities and Exchange Commission solely for purposes of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), which carries with it certain criminal penalties in the event of
a knowing or willful misrepresentation.



Securities and Exchange Commission

450 Fifth Street, NW

Washington, DC 20549



Re: Andrew Corporation



Ladies and Gentlemen:



In accordance with the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 USC 1350), each of the undersigned hereby certifies that:



| | (i) | this Current Report on Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Andrew Corporation.
| | ---- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated as of this 14th day of December 2005.



|                                      |  |  |  |                        
|------------------------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|/s/ Ralph E. Faison                   |  |  |  | /s/ Marty R. Kittrell  
|Ralph E. Faison                       |  |  |  | Marty R. Kittrell      
|President and Chief Executive Officer |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST 

COMPANY, AS TRUSTEE UNDER THE 

POOLING AND SERVICING AGREEMENT 

DATED AS OF NOVEMBER 1, 2002, MORGAN 

STANLEY ABS CAPITAL I INC. TRUST 2002-

HE3

 PLAINTIFF 

CASE NUMBER:1:12-cv-699 

VS. DISTRICT JUDGE: Ruben Castillo

MAURICE D. WALTON, VALDA WALTON,

 DEFENDANT(S).

MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Young B. Kim

MOTION FOR JUDGMENT FOR FORECLOSURE AND SALE

Plaintiff, by counsel, moves this Court for the entry of a Judgment for Foreclosure and Sale 

based on the pleadings of record with this Court. 

Respectfully submitted,

__/s/ James N. Pappas ____________ 

One of Plaintiff's Attorneys

James N. Pappas # 6291873

Burke Costanza & Carberry LLP

Attorneys for Plaintiff

225 W. Washington St., Ste. 2200

Chicago, IL 60606

(219) 769-1313
1845.606-70 Contractor's approved scrap procedure. ( a ) When a contractor has an approved scrap procedure, certain property may be routinely disposed of in accordance with that procedure and not processed under this section.
( d ) Property in scrap condition, other than that disposed of through the contractor's approved scrap procedure, shall be reported on appropriate inventory schedules for disposition in accordance with the provisions of FAR Part 45 and NFS 1845.
[76 FR 2006, Jan. 12, 2011]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER>       1
       
<S>                                     <C>       
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       Mar-01-1997
<PERIOD-START>                          Mar-03-1996
<PERIOD-END>                            Aug-31-1996                     
<CASH>                                      764,000
<SECURITIES>                                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                            12,577,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                      0
<INVENTORY>                              17,445,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         33,613,000
<PP&E>                                   20,931,000
<DEPRECIATION>                           10,831,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           47,066,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    25,895,000
<BONDS>                                           0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<COMMON>                                  1,267,000            
<OTHER-SE>                               18,324,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             47,066,000
<SALES>                                  15,593,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         24,477,000
<CGS>                                    11,536,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            16,197,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            (5,000)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          687,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         (3,770,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                              1,583,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     (2,187,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                            (2,187,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   .44
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   .44

        

</TABLE>
#### Hat Corporation of America, Respondent, v. Byer-Rolnick Hat Corporation, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

Order entered on November 27, 1959, disaffirming the report of the Official Referee and denying defendant-appellant’s motion to vacate service of the summons, unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondent. No opinion. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Stevens, Eager and Noonan, JJ.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. George Aiken, Appellant.

Motion by appellant to revoke the designation of assigned counsel and to assign new counsel, granted. The designation heretofore made of Abraham H. Brodsky, Esq., as counsel to prosecute the appeal, is revoked, and in his place Anthony A. Marra, Esq., 100 Centre St., New York 13, New York, is designated. The appeal is ordered on the calendar for the January 1961 Term. Appellant’s time to serve and file his brief is extended to December 14, 1960. Appellant is directed to file six copies of his typewritten brief and to serve one copy on the District Attorney. Nolan, P. J., Beldoek, Ughetta, Kleinfeld and Christ, JJ., concur.
### §7005. Under Secretary of Agriculture for Marketing and Regulatory Programs

#### (a) Authorization

The Secretary is authorized to establish in the Department the position of Under Secretary of Agriculture for Marketing and Regulatory Programs.

#### (b) Confirmation required

If the Secretary establishes the position of Under Secretary of Agriculture for Marketing and Regulatory Programs authorized under subsection (a), the Under Secretary shall be appointed by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate.

#### (c) Functions of Under Secretary

#### (1) Principal functions

Upon establishment, the Secretary shall delegate to the Under Secretary of Agriculture for Marketing and Regulatory Programs those functions and duties under the jurisdiction of the Department that are related to agricultural marketing, animal and plant health inspection, grain inspection, and packers and stockyards.

#### (2) Additional functions

The Under Secretary of Agriculture for Marketing and Regulatory Programs shall perform such other functions and duties as may be required by law or prescribed by the Secretary.

#### (d) Succession

Any official who is serving as Assistant Secretary of Agriculture for Marketing and Regulatory Programs on October 21, 1998, and who was appointed by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, shall not be required to be reappointed under subsection (b) to the successor position authorized under subsection (a) if the Secretary establishes the position, and the official occupies the new position, within 180 days after October 21, 1998 (or such later date set by the Secretary if litigation delays rapid succession).

(Pub. L. 103–354, title II, §285, as added Pub. L. 105–277, div. A, §101(a) [title X, §1001(3)], Oct. 21, 1998, 112 Stat. 2681, 2681–41.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section is comprised of section 285 of Pub. L. 103–354, as added by Pub. L. 105–277. Subsec. (e) of section 285 of Pub. L. 103–354 amended section 5314 of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.
Presidential Documents

Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 8 / Wednesday, January 13, 2021 / Presidential Documents 2951 

Proclamation 10132 of January 10, 2021 

Honoring United States Capitol Police Officers 

By the President of the United States of America 

A Proclamation 

As a sign of respect for the service and sacrifice of United States Capitol 

Police Officers Brian D. Sicknick and Howard Liebengood, and all Capitol 

Police Officers and law enforcement across this great Nation, by the authority 

vested in me as President of the United States by the Constitution and 

the laws of the United States of America, I hereby order that the flag 

of the United States shall be flown at half-staff at the White House and 

upon all public buildings and grounds, at all military posts and naval 

stations, and on all naval vessels of the Federal Government in the District 

of Columbia and throughout the United States and its Territories and possessions until sunset, January 13, 2021. I also direct that the flag shall be 

flown at half-staff for the same length of time at all United States embassies, 

legations, consular offices, and other facilities abroad, including all military 

facilities and naval vessels and stations. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this tenth day of 

January, in the year of our Lord two thousand twenty-one, and of the 

Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and fortyfifth. 

[FR Doc. 2021–00830 

Filed 1–12–21; 11:15 am] 

Billing code 3295–F1–P 


Trump.EPS</GPH>
Exhibit 32(d)








CERTIFICATION FURNISHED PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Carolina Power & Light Company (the “Company”) for the period ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Mark F. Mulhern, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)           the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)           the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.











/s/ Mark F. Mulhern


Mark F. Mulhern


Senior Vice President and


Chief Financial Officer


August 6, 2010








This certification is being furnished and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Transportation Safety Board

# TIME AND DATE: 

9:30am, Tuesday, February 9, 2021.

# PLACE: 

Virtual.

# STATUS: 

The one item may be viewed by the public through webcast only.

# MATTER TO BE CONSIDERED:

66515 Aviation Investigation Report: Rapid Descent into Terrain, Island Express Helicopters Inc., Sikorsky S-76B, N72EX, Calabasas, California, January 26, 2020

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

                        Candi Bing at (202) 590-8384 or by email at                         *bingc@ntsb.gov*.                              ( print page 6374)    

                        Media Information Contact: Keith Holloway by email at                         *keith.holloway@ntsb.gov*                         or at (202) 314-6100 and Eric Weiss by email at                         *eric.weiss@ntsb.gov*                         or at (202) 314-6100.                    

                        This meeting will take place virtually. The public may view it through a live or archived webcast by accessing a link under “Webcast of Events” on the NTSB home page at                         *www.ntsb.gov*.                    

                        There may be changes to this event due to the evolving situation concerning the novel coronavirus (COVID-19). Schedule updates, including weather-related cancellations, are also available at                         *www.ntsb.gov*.                    

The National Transportation Safety Board is holding this meeting under the Government in the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552(b).

Dated: Friday, January 15, 2021.

Candi R. Bing,

Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 2021-01362 Filed 1-15-21; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 7533-01-P
# Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed April 13

, 2016.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D15-1964

Lower Tribunal No. 14-23417

________________



### Vivian Restrepo

, Petitioner,

vs.



### Seidy Carrera

, Respondent.

A Writ of Certiorari to the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Antonio

Marin

, Judge.

Bernstein, Chackman, Liss

, and Neil Rose (Hollywood), for petitioner.

Ellsley Sobol, P.L., and Eric M. Ellsley (Plantation)

, for respondent.

Before EMAS, FERNANDEZ and SCALES, JJ.

ON MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION

FERNANDEZ, J.We grant respondent’s Motion for Clarification, withdraw this Court’s

previous opinion issued on January 20, 2016, and substitute the following opinion

in its place:

Vivian Restrepo petitions this Court to review the trial court’s order

directing petitioner to “provide cell phone numbers and/or names of providers used

during the six (6) hour period before the time of the crash and the six (6) hour

period after the crash, same to be provided within thirty (30) days from the date of

this Order.” Upon review of the petition and based on respondent’s concession of

error that the trial court’s order directing petitioner to reveal information regarding

her cell phone violates petitioner’s Fifth Amendment rights, while her criminal

case is pending, and constitutes a departure from the essential requirements of law

from which petitioner has no adequate remedy on appeal, we grant the petition and

quash the order requiring petitioner to provide information regarding her cell

phone number and her cell phone carrier. We express no opinion on the status of

the petitioner’s Fifth Amendment rights once her criminal case has concluded.

Petition granted; order quashed.

2