alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 11 (Tuesday, January 19, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 5224]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-00979]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities; 
Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Minority Health and 
Health Disparities Special Emphasis Panel; NIMHD Mentored Career 
Development Awards (Ks).
    Date: March 1, 2021.
    Time: 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Gateway Building, 7201 
Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20817 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Xinli Nan, M.D., Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Division of Scientific Programs, National Institute on 
Minority Health and Health Disparities, National Institutes of 
Health, Gateway Building, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892, 
301-594-7784, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a0f8c9ceccc98eeec1cee0cec9c88ec7cfd6"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="96cefff8faffb8d8f7f8d6f8fffeb8f1f9e0">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: January 12, 2021.
David W. Freeman,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2021-00979 Filed 1-15-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000318380
<NAME>                                           Public Storage, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                                        1
<CURRENCY>                                                         US
       
<S>                                                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                  12-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                         Dec-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                            Jan-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                              Dec-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                                     1
<CASH>                                                     51,225,000
<SECURITIES>                                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                           51,225,000
<PP&E>                                                  3,045,429,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                          (411,176,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                          3,403,904,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                      63,813,000
<BONDS>                                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                               0
<PREFERRED>                                               868,900,000
<COMMON>                                                   12,298,000
<OTHER-SE>                                              2,238,142,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                            3,403,904,000
<SALES>                                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                          582,151,000
<CGS>                                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                             213,881,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                          116,454,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                          4,507,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                           227,019,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                 0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                     0
<CHANGES>                                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                              227,019,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                    1.30
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                    1.30
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

GEORGE BROWN,

Plaintiff,

v.

CITY OF CHICAGO, et al.,

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. 12 C 1764

The Honorable Martha M. Pacold

Judge Presiding

JOINT STATUS REPORT

The Parties, the Plaintiff and all Defendants, through their respective counsel, file this joint 

status report pursuant to the Court’s Order of August 22, 2023 (Doc. 233).

The Plaintiff’s Post Trial Motion Trial and the Defendants’ Motion for Costs

The parties conferred. Both motions are opposed. The parties agree to the following 

briefing schedule:

Defendants’ response to the Post Trial Motion on or before September 22, 2023;

Plaintiff’s response to the Motion for Costs on or before September 22, 2023;

Plaintiff’s reply in support of Post Trial Motion on or before October 13, 2023;

Defendants’ reply in support of Motion for Costs on or before October 13, 2023.

Respectfully submitted,

PLAINTIFF GEORGE BROWN,

By: /s/ Peter V. Bustamante

Peter V. Bustamante

17 North State Street, #1550

Chicago, Illinois 60602

(312) 346-2072

pvbust@bustamantelaw.com

DEFENDANTS CITY OF CHICAGO, 

GEORGE MOUSSA and JOSEPH LOPEZ,

By: /s/ Jessica L. Griff

Jessica L. Griff

Chief Assistant Corporation Counsel

City of Chicago Department of Law

2N. LaSalle St., Suite 420

Chicago, IL 60602

Tel: 312-744-2826

(312) 744-2826 

jessica.griff@cityofchicago.org

Case: 1:12-cv-01764 Document #: 234 Filed: 08/23/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:2152
Exhibit 10(a)
Consent of Sutherland, Asbill & Brennan



April 26, 2000

Board of Directors
Kansas City Life Insurance Company
3520 Broadway
Kansas City, MO  64141-6139

Re:  Kansas City Life Variable Annuity Separate Account

Ladies and Gentlemen:

We hereby consent to the reference to our name under the caption "Legal Matters"
in the  Statement  of  Additional  Information  filed as part of  Post-Effective
Amendment No. 6 to the  registration  statement on Form N-4 for Kansas City Life
Variable  Life Annuity  Separate  Account  (File No.  33-89984).  In giving this
consent, we do not admit that we are in the category of persons whose consent is
required under Section 7 of the Securities Act of 1933.

Very truly yours,

SUTHERLAND, ASBILL & BRENNAN LLP

By:/s/ Stephen E. Roth
Stephen E. Roth
203.905 Procedures for investigating complaints. ( 1 ) Unless the DoD Inspector General makes a determination that the complaint is frivolous, fails to allege a violation of the prohibition in 203.903, or has been previously addressed in another Federal or State judicial or administrative proceeding initiated by the complainant, the DoD Inspector General will investigate the complaint.
( 2 ) If the DoD Inspector General investigates the complaint, the DoD Inspector General will— ( i ) Notify the complainant, the contractor alleged to have committed the violation, and the head of the agency; and
( ii ) Provide a written report of findings to the complainant, the contractor alleged to have committed the violation, and the head of the agency.
( 3 ) Upon completion of the investigation, the DoD Inspector General— ( i ) Either will determine that the complaint is frivolous, fails to allege a violation of the prohibition in 203.903, or has been previously addressed in another Federal or State judicial or administrative proceeding initiated by the complainant, or will submit the report addressed in paragraph (2) of this section within 180 days after receiving the complaint; and
( ii ) If unable to submit a report within 180 days, will submit the report within the additional time period, up to 180 days, as agreed to by the person submitting the complaint.
( 4 ) The DoD Inspector General may not respond to any inquiry or disclose any information from or about any person alleging the reprisal, except to the extent that such response or disclosure is— ( i ) Made with the consent of the person alleging reprisal;
( ii ) Made in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552a (the Freedom of Information Act) or as required by any other applicable Federal law; or
( iii ) Necessary to conduct an investigation of the alleged reprisal.
( 5 ) The legal burden of proof specified at paragraph (e) of 5 U.S.C. 1221 (Individual Right of Action in Certain Reprisal Cases) shall be controlling for the purposes of an investigation conducted by the DoD Inspector General, decision by the head of an agency, or judicial or administrative proceeding to determine whether prohibited discrimination has occurred.
[74 FR 2410, Jan. 15, 2009, as amended at 78 FR 59853, Sept. 30, 2013; 79 FR 11337, Feb. 28, 2014]
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Donald C. Wood, the President and Chief Executive Officer of Federal Realty Investment Trust (the Company), has executed this certification in connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange
Commission of the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006 (the Report). The undersigned hereby certifies that:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                 |  |                                                                                             
|---------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                 |  | /s/ Donald C. Wood                                                                          
|November 6, 2006 |  | Donald C. Wood, President, Chief Executive Officer and Trustee (Principal Executive Officer)
#### 1852.209-70 [Reserved]
<PAGE>

               Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors


We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Independent Auditors"
in the Prospectuses, and to the use of our report dated January 28, 2000
accompanying the consolidated financial statements of the Penn Mutual Life
Insurance Company for the year ended December 31, 1999, and to the use of our
report dated April 4, 2000 accompanying the financial statements of Penn Mutual
Variable Life Account I for the year ended December 31, 1999 in the
Post-Effective Amendment Number 8 to Registration Statement Number 33-87276 on
Form S-6 and the related Prospectuses of Penn Mutual Variable Life Account I.

                                                            /s/Ernst & Young LLP

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
April 12, 2000
#### Michael Zubko, Respondent, v. Mary Immaculate Hospital et al., Appellants. Mary Immaculate Hospital, Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Otis Elevator Company, Third-Party Defendant-Respondent.

In an action to recover damages for personal injury sustained by plaintiff through the alleged negligence of defendants Mary Immaculate Hospital and Otis Elevator Company, in which the hospital, as a third-party plaintiff, instituted a third-party action against the Elevator Company, as a third-party defendant, the *644defendants appeal as follows from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered November 16, 1962 after trial upon a jury’s verdict: (1) Both defendants appeal from so much of the judgment as is in the plaintiff’s favor against them. (2) The defendant hospital, as third-party plaintiff, appeals from so much of the judgment as dismissed its third-party complaint against the Elevator Company as third-party defendant. Judgment, insofar as it is in plaintiff’s favor against both defendants, reversed on the law, without costs, and amended complaint dismissed on the law. The findings of fact implicit in the jury’s verdict are affirmed. Judgment, insofar as it dismissed the third-party complaint, affirmed, without costs. Plaintiff claims that, after visiting his wife (who was a patient in the defendant hospital), he entered an elevator in the hospital and pushed a button; that the elevator went down, but stopped between floors; that he shouted and pounded on the door (or inside gate) of the elevator for about a half hour; and that when no one came to his aid he kicked against the outer doors of the elevator. It appears that in kicking against such door his foot caught in a crossbar and as a result he sustained the injuries for which he sues to recover damages. In our opinion, plaintiff failed to prove any negligence on the part of either of the defendants. Plaintiff failed to prove what caused the elevator to stop between floors. Nor did plaintiff prove that the cause of such stop was attributable to a condition of which defendants knew or should have known and which they failed to correct *(Koch*v. *Oils Elevator Co.,*10 A D 2d 464). Moreover, the record established that plaintiff’s injuries were not caused by the stopping of the elevator between floors, but by his own act in kicking against the outer doors of the elevator, as the result of which the heel of his foot was caught in the crossbar (cf. *Jackson*v. *Greene,*201 N. Y. 76). Beldoek, P. J., Ughetta, Brennan, Hill and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
- pa-templeu-1-comp
- '03242103 Recipient Notification Letter' of '24-00861-F Philadelphia'
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 6 (Monday, January 11, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 1983]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-00220]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
Diseases Special Emphasis Panel HHS-NIH-CDC-SBIR PHS 2021-1: Point-
of-Care HIV Viral Load, Drug Resistance, and Adherence Assays (Topic 
87).
    Date: February 5, 2021.
    Time: 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate contract proposals.
    Place: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, 
National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3G22B, 
Rockville, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Kristina Wickham, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural 
Activities, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, 
National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3G22B, 
Rockville, MD 20852, 301-761-5390, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7d160f140e0914131c530a141e16151c103d131415531a120b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="046f766d77706d6a652a736d676f6c6569446a6d6c2a636b72">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 5, 2021.
Tyeshia M. Roberson,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2021-00220 Filed 1-8-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### 1511.000 Scope of part.

This part implements FAR part 11 and provides policy and procedures for describing Agency needs.
SERVED MAY 27, 2011 

•^TMhNT OF 

-ORTATIOri 

OPFRATiOK:^ 

A R: 5S 

u s DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. 

FAA DOCKET No. CP10NM0008 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

DMSFAA-2010-0792 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

On September 10, 2010, the Federal Aviation Administration ("Complainant") 

filed a Complaint. Respondent Federal Express, Inc. ("Respondent") had on August 17, 

2010 filed a Request for Hearing. 

On May 26, 2011, Respondent withdrew its Request for Hearing. 

14 C.F.R. § 13.215 states: "At any time before or during a hearing, an agency 

attorney may withdraw a complaint or party may withdraw a request for a hearing 

without the consent of the administrative law judge. If an agency attorney 

withdraws the complaint or a party withdraws the request for a hearing and the 

answer, the administrative law judge shall dismiss the proceedings under this 

subpart with prejudice." 

WHEREFORE, the within filed Withdrawal of Request for Hearing having been 

read and considered, it is ORDERED as follows: 

1. Respondent's Withdrawal of Request for Hearing is hereby granted; and 

2. This proceeding be and is hereby dismissed with prejudice. 
V 

s o ORDERED. 

*-3r Eichard C. Goodwin 

'"^« : j\(hninistrative Law Judge 

Attachment - Service List 

lit' 'Siiti.,'* 
FAA Docket No. CP10NM0008 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Hearing Docket 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building - Suite 2W1000' 

ONE COPY 

Glenn P. Wicks, Respondent's Counsel 

Roncevert D. Almond 

The Wicks Group, PLLC 

1215 17* Street, NW 

Sumner Annex, Fourth Floor 

Washington, DC 20036 

TEL: 202-457-7790 

FAX: 202-457-7799 

Scott R. Morris, Complainant's Counsel 

Office of Regional Counsel 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Northwest Mountain Region, ANM-7 

1601 Lind Avenue, S.W. 

Renton, WA 98057 

TEL: 425-227-1417 

FAX: 425-227-1007 

David J. Bronczek, President 

Federal Express Corporation, Respondent 

nd Delivery Code 7622, Bldg G, 2 Floor 

3620 Hacks Cross Road 

Building B, 3''' Floor 

Memphis, TN 38125 

Cynthia Chandler-Snell, Respondent's 

Counsel 

Federal Express Corporation 

Regulatory Division 

3620 Hacks Cross Road 

Building B, 3"* Floor 

Memphis, TN 38125 

TEL: 901-434-8361 

FAX: 901-434-8283 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, 

Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Building Ground Floor, Room El2-320 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 

202-366-5121 Legal Assistant 

FAX: 202-366-7536
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6,1

Eastern Division

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:11−cr−00750

Honorable Robert M. Dow Jr.

Jason Correa, et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Tuesday, May 27, 2014:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr: Status hearing held on

5/27/2014. Further Status hearing set for 8/19/2014 at 09:15 AM. Without objection, time

to be excluded in the interest of justice for the complexity of the case, and for continuity

of counsel under I 8 U.S.C. § 3161 (h)(7)(A)(B) from 5/27/2014 to and including

8/19/2014. Mailed notice (tbk, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.
17.103 Definitions. As used in this subpart— *Cancellation* means the cancellation (within a contractually specified time) of the total requirements of all remaining program years. Cancellation results when the contracting officer ( 1 ) Notifies the contractor of nonavailability of funds for contract performance for any subsequent program year, or
( 2 ) Fails to notify the contractor that funds are available for performance of the succeeding program year requirement.
*Cancellation ceiling* means the maximum cancellation charge that the contractor can receive in the event of cancellation.
*Cancellation charge* means the amount of unrecovered costs which would have been recouped through amortization over the full term of the contract, including the term canceled.
*Multiyear contract* means a contract for the purchase of supplies or services for more than 1, but not more than 5, program years. A multiyear contract may provide that performance under the contract during the second and subsequent years of the contract is contingent upon the appropriation of funds, and (if it does so provide) may provide for a cancellation payment to be made to the contractor if appropriations are not made. The key distinguishing difference between multiyear contracts and multiple year contracts is that multiyear contracts, defined in the statutes cited at 17.101, buy more than 1 year's requirement (of a product or service) without establishing and having to exercise an option for each program year after the first.
*Nonrecurring costs* means those costs which are generally incurred on a one-time basis and include such costs as plant or equipment relocation, plant rearrangement, special tooling and special test equipment, preproduction engineering, initial spoilage and rework, and specialized work force training.
*Recurring costs* means costs that vary with the quantity being produced, such as labor and materials.
[48 FR 42231, Sept. 19, 1983, as amended at 66 FR 2129, Jan. 10, 2001; 67 FR 43514, June 27, 2002]
1835.016-71 NASA Research Announcements. ( a ) Scope. An NRA is used to announce research interests in support of NASA's programs, and, after peer or scientific review using factors in the NRA, select proposals for funding. Unlike an RFP containing a statement of work or specification to which offerors are to respond, an NRA provides for the submission of competitive project ideas, conceived by the offerors, in one or more program areas of interest. An NRA shall not be used when the requirement is sufficiently defined to specify an end product or service.
[62 FR 4469, Jan. 30, 1997, as amended at 62 FR 14017, Mar. 25, 1997; 63 FR 9967, Feb. 27, 1998. Redesignated and amended at 64 FR 48561, Sept. 7, 1999; 65 FR 12485, Mar. 9, 2000; 65 FR 46628, July 31, 2000; 65 FR 82297, Dec. 28, 2000; 66 FR 53547, Oct. 23, 2001; 67 FR 30604, May 7, 2002; 69 FR 35272, June 24, 2004]