T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T HA B I B KO L AWOL E KO F I B R AI MAH, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 12- 70295 A ge nc yN o. A 079- 151- 845 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o a r do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d Jul y24, 2013 ** B efo re: A L A R C Ó N , C L IF T O N , an dC A L L A H A N , C i rcu i tJu d g es. H abi b K ol a w ol e K of

i B r a i m ah, ana t i ve a nd c i t i z e n of G hana , pe t i t i ons f

or re vi ew of the B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s’ (“ B IA ”) order di sm i ss i ng hi s app ea l f r o m an i mmi g r a t i o n j u d g e ’ s d e c i s i o n d e n y i n g h i s ap p l i c a t i o n f o ra s y l u m, w i thh ol di ng of re m ov al , and p rot ec t i on un der the C on vent i on A gai nstT orture 

# FI LED JU L 31 2013 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS12- 70295 2 (“ C A T ”) . W e have j uri sdi ct i on un der 8 U . S . C . § 1 25 2. R evi ew i ng for s ub st ant i al e v id e n c e th e a g e n c y ’s f a c tu a l f in d in g s , W

akkaryv. H

older , 558 F . 3d 1049, 1056 ( 9 th C i r . 2 0 0 9 ) , we d e n yth e p e t i t i o n f o rr e v i e w. T he re cord do es no tcom pel the concl usi on thatB ra i m ah es t abl i shed e x tr a o r d in a ryc ir c u m s tan c e s e x c u s in g h is u n tim e lya s y lu m ap p lic a tio n . See H usye v v . Mukasey , 5 2 8 F . 3 d1 1 7 2 , 1 1 8 1 -8 2 (9 th C i r. 2 0 0 8 ). A cco rd i n g l y, B rai m ah ’ s asyl u m cl ai m fai l s. W i th r e s pe c tt o w i thhol di ng of r e m ova l , B r a i m ah doe s notc ha l l e nge the agency ’ s f

i nd i ng thathe fa i l ed t o d em on strat e pas tpers ec ut i on , bu the fe ar s r e tu rn in g to G h an ab e c au s e o f h is E w e e th n ic ity , h is M u s lim r e lig io n , an dh is fam i l y’ s w ea l th. S ub st ant i alevi dence s up po rt s the agency’ s f i nd i ng thatB ra i m ah f a ile dto d e m o n s tr a te it is m o r e lik e lyth an n o t th at h e w o u ldb e s ub je c t to p e r s e c u tio n o n a c c o u n t o f ap r o te c te dg r o u n d . Se e Fis h e rv . I NS , 79 F . 3d 955, 962 (9th C i r. 19 96 ) ( en banc) (per se cut i on do es no ti ncl ud e “ m er e di sc ri m i nat i on , as o f f e n s iv e a s it m a yb e ” ) ; Na g o u lko v . I NS , 333 F . 3d 1012, 1018 ( 9th C i r . 2003) (p o ss ib il ity o f f

u tu re p er se cu ti o n to o sp ec u lati v e) . A cc o rd in g ly, B ra im ah ’s w i th h o l d i n g o f rem o v al cl ai m fai l s. F i nal l y, subst ant i alevi dence s up po rt s the agency’ s deni alof C A T re l i ef because B ra i m ah fa i l ed t o est abl i sh i ti s m ore l i kel y than n othe w ou l d b e t ortured12- 70295 3 atthe i nst i gat i on or w i th the ac qu i es ce nce of the go vernm enti f r eturned t o G hana. See Si laya v. Mukasey , 52 4 F . 3d 10 66 , 10 73 (9th C i r. 20 08 ). P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.