alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
[LEGEND]
THIS SCHEDULE HAS BEEN RESTATED TO REFLECT THE COMPANY'S ADOPTION OF 
STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING STANDARDS NO. 128, "EARNINGS PER SHARE" 
(FAS 128) AND CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE 
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN THE COMPANY'S FORM 
10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1996, AND THE QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA 
FROM THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997, AND ARE 
QUALIFIED IN THEIR ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND THE
NOTES THERETO.
[/LEGEND]
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                         118,830
<SECURITIES>                                 1,026,479
<RECEIVABLES>                                  189,829<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0<F1>
<INVENTORY>                                     85,447
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,071,592
<PP&E>                                         829,420
<DEPRECIATION>                                 294,936
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,107,294
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          221,697
<BONDS>                                        150,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,413
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,707,838
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,107,294
<SALES>                                        300,642
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               486,646
<CGS>                                           53,032
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   53,032
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               228,236
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0<F1>
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,892
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 89,457
<INCOME-TAX>                                    29,521
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             59,936
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    59,936
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.50<F2><F3>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.48<F3>
<FN>
<F1>ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE ARE PRESENTED NET OF ALLOWANCE FOR DOUBTFUL ACCOUNTS IN
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET.  THE PROVISION FOR LOSSES ON DOUBTFUL
ACCOUNTS IS NOT REPORTED AS A SEPARATE LINE IN THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF INCOME OF STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS.
<F2>REPRESENTS BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE.
<F3>RESTATED TO REFLECT THE COMPANY'S ADOPTION OF FAS 128.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

***Awarding Other Financial  Assistance (OFA)***

***OFA-Q1:*** Can I use a negative SAI to increase a student’s financial need to increase the amount of need-based aid the student can receive? 

***OFA-A1:*** No. If a student has a negative SAI, the school must convert the negative SAI to a 0 SAI to calculate the student’s financial need. Though the negative SAI can be used as a determining factor when selecting students for school or state aid or for consideration when awarding campus-based funding, the negative SAI cannot be used directly to increase the amount of a student’s financial need for purposes of awarding federal student aid. [Guidance issued 08/04/2023] 

----

 

 Printable view

## How Do I Find...

          - Student loans, forgiveness
          - Higher Education Rulemaking
          - College accreditation
          - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
          - FERPA
          - FAFSA
          - 1098, tax forms

More >

## Information About...

          - Elevating Teaching
          - Early Learning
          - Engage Every Student
          - Unlocking Career Success
          - Cybersecurity

 

----

*Our mission*

Student Loans
Repaying LoansDefaulted LoansLoan ForgivenessLoan Servicers

Grants & Programs
Apply for Pell GrantsGrants ForecastApply for a Grant

Laws & Guidance
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)FERPACivil RightsNew IDEA Website

Data & Research
Education StatisticsPostsecondary Education DataED Data ExpressNation's Report CardWhat Works ClearinghouseOpen Data PlatformCOVID Relief Data

About Us
Contact UsED OfficesJobsPress ReleasesFAQsRecursos en españolBudget, PerformancePrivacy Program

----

          - Notices
          - FOIA
          - Privacy Policy
          - Accessibility
          - Security
          - Information quality
          - Inspector General
          - Whitehouse.gov
          - USA.gov
          - Benefits.gov
          - Regulations.gov
          - vote.gov
#### 1631.205-81 Inferred reasonableness.

If the carrier follows the notification and consent requirements of paragraphs (a), (b) and (c) of 1652.244-70, and subsequently obtains the Contracting officer's consent or ratification, then the reasonableness of the subcontract's costs shall be inferred.

[70 FR 31382, June 1, 2005]
#### 1816.202-70 NASA contract clause.

The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 1852.216-78, Firm-Fixed-Price, in firm-fixed-price solicitations and contracts. Insert the appropriate amount in the resulting contract.
1845.7101-4 Types of deletions from contractor property records. Contractors shall report the types of deletions from contract property records as described in this section. ( a ) *Lost, damaged or destroyed.* Deletion amounts that result from relief from responsibility under FAR 45.503 granted during the reporting period.
( b ) *Transferred in Place.* Deletion amounts that result from transfer of property to a follow-on prime contract or other prime contract with the same contractor.
( c ) *Transferred to NASA Center accountability.* Deletion amounts that result from transfer of accountability to the NASA Center responsible for the contract, whether or not items are physically moved.
( d ) *Transferred to another NASA Center.* Deletion amounts that result from transfer of accountability to a NASA Center other than the one responsible for the contract, whether or not items are physically moved.
( e ) *Transferred to another Government agency.* Deletion amounts that result from transfer of property to another Government agency.
( f ) *Purchased at cost/returned for credit.* Deletion amounts that result from contractor purchase or retention of contractor acquired property as provided in FAR 45.605-1, or from contractor returns to suppliers under FAR 45.605-2.
( g ) *Disposed of through plant clearance process.* Deletions other than transfers within the Federal Government, e.g., donations to eligible recipients, sold at less than cost, or abandoned/directed destruction, or trade-ins.
( h ) *Other.* Types of deletion other than those reported in paragraph (a) through (g) of this section such as those resulting from reclassifications (e.g. from equipment to agency-peculiar property).
[65 FR 54816, Sept. 11, 2000, as amended at 66 FR 41806, Aug. 9, 2001; 67 FR 68535, Nov. 12, 2002]
Order Form (01/2005)

United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois

Name of Assigned Judge

or Magistrate Judge Rebecca R. Pallmeyer Sitting Judge if Otherthan Assigned Judge

CASE NUMBER 12 C 1546 DATE 4/27/2012

CASE

TITLE

Sunlust Pictures, LLC vs. Does 1-75

DOCKET ENTRY TEXT

Plaintiff’s motion to compel compliance with subpoena [12] granted. Comcast is ordered to comply with the

subpoena.

Notices mailed by Judicial staff.

 Courtroom Deputy

Initials:

ETV

12C1546 Sunlust Pictures, LLC vs. Does 1-75 Page 1 of 1

Case: 1:12-cv-01546 Document #: 14 Filed: 04/27/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:52
To analyze the year-to-year change in income of borrowers in income driven repayment plans, the 

Department queried NSLDS data for AGI in 2010-2014 for students with ED-held loans currently in IDR 

plans. The vast majority of these students did not have income information for 2010, 2011, or 2014, so 

we focused on the AGIs for 2012 and 2013 for one year of change. As we do not know if a zero in the 

data represents a true zero income or unavailable data, we limited the analysis to 183,871 borrowers 

who had non-zero incomes reported for both 2012 and 2013 (out of 315,631 borrowers in the data 

set). Even with this limitation and the exclusion of some possible true zeros, the data indicates a 

substantial percentage of students with significant changes in income, as seen in the table 

below. Please let us know if you have any questions.

Income Down 

$10k or more

Down 

$1k to 

$9,999

No 

Change 

(-$999 

to 

+$999)

Up $1k 

to 

$9,999

Up 

$10,000 

or more Total

Borrower Count 7,961 26,445 24,619 73,355 51,491 183,871

% of Borrowers 4% 14% 13% 40% 28%

Average Change (23,105) (3,986) 69 4,734 24,928 7,305
#### Carlton Properties, Inc. v. Hadley Corporation et al.

Motion for leave to reargue appeal denied, with $10 costs. Concur — Rabin, J. P,, Valente, McNally, Stevens and Bastow, JJ,
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

EASTERN DIVISION 

NICK PEARSON, FRANCISCO PADILLA, 

CECILIA LINARES, AUGUSTINA BLANCO, 

ABEL GONZALEZ, and RICHARD JENNINGS, 

On Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly 

Situated, 

 

 Plaintiffs, 

v. 

NBTY, INC., a Delaware corporation; and REXALL 

SUNDOWN, INC., a Florida corporation; TARGET 

CORPORATION, a Minnesota Corporation 

 Defendants. 

THEODORE H. FRANK, 

 Objector. 

Case No. 11-CV-07972 

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE 

Hon. James B. Zagel 

 

TO THE COURT, ALL PARTIES, AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: 

 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the undersigned hereby appears as counsel of record in the 

above-captioned case on behalf of Objector Theodore H. Frank and requests that all notices, orders 

and/or other information in this case be served upon the individuals identified below: 

Melissa A. Holyoak 

CENTER FOR CLASS ACTION FAIRNESS 

1718 M Street NW, No. 236 

Washington, DC 20036 

melissaholyoak@gmail.com 

(573) 823-5377 

Case: 1:11-cv-07972 Document #: 94 Filed: 08/01/13 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:727
Dated: August 1, 2013 Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ Melissa A. Holyoak 

Melissa A. Holyoak (DC Bar No. 487759) 

CENTER FOR CLASS ACTION FAIRNESS 

1718 M Street NW, No. 236 

Washington, DC 20036 

melissaholyoak@gmail.com 

(573) 823-5377 

Case: 1:11-cv-07972 Document #: 94 Filed: 08/01/13 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:728
Notice of Appearance 

Case No. 11-CV-07972 4 

Certificate of Service 

The undersigned certifies she electronically filed the foregoing Notice of Appearance via the 

ECF system for the Northern District of Illinois, thus effecting service on all attorneys registered for 

electronic filing. Additionally she caused to be served via first class mail a copy of this Notice of 

Appearance upon the following: 

Peter N. Freiberg 

Denlea & Carton LLP 

One North Broadway 

Suite 509 

White Plains, NY 10601 

Stewart M. Weltman 

Stewart M. Weltman, LLC 

53 W. Jackson 

Suite 364 

Chicago, IL 60604 

Hon. James B. Zagel 

United States District Court for the Northern 

District of Illinois 

Everett McKinley Dirksen United States Courthouse 

Chambers 2588 

219 South Dearborn Street 

Chicago, IL 60604 

Kara L. McCall 

Sidley Austin LLP 

One S. Dearborn Street 

Chicago, IL 60603 

Dated: August 1, 2013. 

/s/ Melissa A. Holyoak 

Case: 1:11-cv-07972 Document #: 94 Filed: 08/01/13 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:729
#### Haisfield *v.*Mayor and Council of Gainesville.

April 17, 1913.

Hill, J.

The evidence being conflicting on every material issue in the case, the court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to grant an interlocutory injunction.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*

*716Petition for injunction. Before Judge Jones. Hall superior court. October 19, 1912.

*Adams & Quillian*and *Howard*Thompson, for plaintiff.

*H. II. Perry*and *W. M. Johnson,*for defendant.
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

Laws & GuidanceGENERAL

Overview | **Guidelines** | Information Correction Requests and Appeals | Contact

## Guidelines

| **You are here:**Guidelines > Information Quality |
|-------------------------------------------------------|

These Guidelines assess information quality using three factors: utility, objectivity,  and integrity. These elements are intended to ensure that information the Department  disseminates is useful, accurate, reliable, unbiased, and secure. Department  staff will treat information quality as integral to the creation, collection,  maintenance, and dissemination of information, and will review products before  they are disseminated to ensure that they are consistent with these Guidelines.  In particular, information products from the Department will follow the *Guide  to Publishing at the US Department of Education*, and all clearance submissions  under the Paperwork Reduction Act will explain how the proposed collection  of information will yield high quality, objective, and useful data, consistent  with OMB's guidelines. Furthermore, the Guidelines provide that the level of  quality assurance for information must be tied to its level of importance. *Influential  Information,* that is information that will or does have a clear and substantial  impact on public policies or private sector decisions, must meet a higher level  of quality as described on page 9 of these Guidelines.

- Utility 
- Objectivity 
- Integrity 
- Influential Information 

|          |
|----------|
| Previous | Table of Contents | Next |

|        |
|--------|
|   | Printable viewShare this page |
|        |

## How Do I Find...

          - Student loans, forgiveness
          - College accreditation
          - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
          - FERPA
          - FAFSA
          - 1098, tax forms

More >

## Information About...

          - Transforming Teaching
          - Family and Community Engagement
          - Early Learning

 

|  |
|--|
|  |
|  | No Related Topics Found |  |
|  |

----

*Our mission*

Student Loans
Repaying LoansDefaulted LoansLoan ForgivenessLoan Servicers

Grants & Programs
Apply for Pell GrantsGrants ForecastApply for a GrantEligibility for Grants

Laws & Guidance
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)FERPACivil RightsNew IDEA Website

Data & Research
Education StatisticsPostsecondary Education DataED Data ExpressNation's Report CardWhat Works Clearinghouse

About Us
Contact UsED OfficesJobsPress ReleasesFAQsRecursos en españolBudget, PerformancePrivacy ProgramSubscribe to E-Mail Updates

----

          - Notices
          - FOIA
          - Privacy Policy
          - Accessibility
          - Security
          - Information quality
          - Inspector General
          - Whitehouse.gov
          - USA.gov
          - Benefits.gov
          - Regulations.gov
EXHIBIT D

Case: 1:12-cv-01410 Document #: 226-4 Filed: 05/12/17 Page 1 of 4 PageID #:1824
Case: 1:12-cv-01410 Document #: 226-4 Filed: 05/12/17 Page 2 of 4 PageID #:1825
Case: 1:12-cv-01410 Document #: 226-4 Filed: 05/12/17 Page 3 of 4 PageID #:1826
Case: 1:12-cv-01410 Document #: 226-4 Filed: 05/12/17 Page 4 of 4 PageID #:1827
1405.207 Preparation and transmittal of synopses. In addition to the synopsis information generally required under FAR 5.207, as a best business practice, it is recommended each synopsis of a proposed contract action under other than full and open competition include the location where the offeror may obtain: ( a ) A description of specific qualifications the Government requires of the product or service to meet the Government's minimum needs; and
( b ) The factors the Government will use to evaluate the product or service information prospective contractors provide under the proposed contract action.
THE PURPOSE OF THE AMENDMENT IS TO ADD EX-27 FDS FOR 2ND QUARTER 10-Q
[ARTICLE] 5
[LEGEND]
THE SCHEDULE CONTRAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM BOTH
THE JUNE 30, 1995 BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENT OF INCOME AND EXPENSES
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
[/LEGEND]
[CIK] 0000017294
[NAME] CAPITAL RESOURCES REAL ESTATE PARTNERSHIP II
<TABLE>
<S>                             <C>
[PERIOD-TYPE]                   6-MOS
[FISCAL-YEAR-END]                          DEC-31-1995
[PERIOD-END]                               JUN-30-1995
[CASH]                                             171
[SECURITIES]                                         0
[RECEIVABLES]                                        0
[ALLOWANCES]                                         0
[INVENTORY]                                          0
[CURRENT-ASSETS]                                     0
[PP&E]                                         931,189
[DEPRECIATION]                                 338,890
[TOTAL-ASSETS]                                 789,257
[CURRENT-LIABILITIES]                                0
[BONDS]                                      1,348,019
[COMMON]                                             0
[PREFERRED-MANDATORY]                                0
[PREFERRED]                                          0
[OTHER-SE]                                     778,532
[TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY]                   789,257
[SALES]                                              0
[TOTAL-REVENUES]                               101,868
[CGS]                                                0
[TOTAL-COSTS]                                        0
[OTHER-EXPENSES]                               121,298
[LOSS-PROVISION]                                     0
[INTEREST-EXPENSE]                              27,499
[INCOME-PRETAX]                                      0
[INCOME-TAX]                                         0
[INCOME-CONTINUING]                                  0
[DISCONTINUED]                                       0
[EXTRAORDINARY]                                      0
[CHANGES]                                            0
[NET-INCOME]                                  (44,457)
[EPS-PRIMARY]                                        0
[EPS-DILUTED]                                        0
</TABLE>
122 STAT. 2428 PUBLIC LAW 110–258—JULY 1, 2008 

Public Law 110–258 

110th Congress 

An Act 

To revise the short title of the Fannie Lou Hamer, Rosa Parks, and Coretta Scott 

King Voting Rights Act Reauthorization and Amendments Act of 2006. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

Section 1 of the Fannie Lou Hamer, Rosa Parks, and Coretta 

Scott King Voting Rights Act Reauthorization and Amendments 

Act of 2006 (Public Law 109–246) is amended by striking ‘‘and 

Coretta Scott King’’ and inserting ‘‘Coretta Scott King, Ce ́sar E. 

Cha ́vez, Barbara C. Jordan, William C. Vela ́squez, and Dr. Hector 

P. Garcia’’. 

SEC. 2. CONFORMING AMENDMENTS. 

Paragraphs (7) and (8) of section 4(a), and section 13(a)(1), 

of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 (42 U.S.C. 1973b(a), 1973k(a)(1)) 

are each amended by striking ‘‘and Coretta Scott King’’ and 

inserting ‘‘Coretta Scott King, Ce ́sar E. Cha ́vez, Barbara C. Jordan, 

William C. Vela ́squez, and Dr. Hector P. Garcia’’. 

SEC. 3. CONSTRUCTION. 

Title I of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 (42 U.S.C. 1973 et 

seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following: 

‘‘SEC. 20. A reference in this title to the effective date of 

the amendments made by, or the date of the enactment of, the 

Fannie Lou Hamer, Rosa Parks, Coretta Scott King, Ce ́sar E. 

Cha ́vez, Barbara C. Jordan, William C. Vela ́squez, and Dr. Hector 

P. Garcia Voting Rights Act Reauthorization and Amendments Act 

of 2006 shall be considered to refer to, respectively, the effective 

date of the amendments made by, or the date of the enactment 

42 USC 1973q. 

42 USC 1971 

note. 

July 1, 2008 

[S. 188] 


dkrause on GSDDPC44 with PUBLIC LAWS
PUBLIC LAW 110–258—JULY 1, 2008 122 STAT. 2429 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S. 188: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD: 

Vol. 153 (2007): Feb. 15, considered and passed Senate. 

Vol. 154 (2008): June 17, considered and passed House. 

Æ 

of, the Fannie Lou Hamer, Rosa Parks, and Coretta Scott King 

Voting Rights Act Reauthorization and Amendments Act of 2006.’’. 

Approved July 1, 2008. 


dkrause on GSDDPC44 with PUBLIC LAWS
#### 203.171-1 Scope.

This section implements section 847 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Pub. L. 110-181).

[74 FR 2409, Jan. 15, 2009, as amended at 87 FR 59028, Sept. 29, 2022]