alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ILND 450 (Rev. 10/13) Judgment in a Civil Action

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

DANYA DAVIS, et al., 

Plaintiff(s), 

 

v. 

PACKER ENGINEERING, INC., et al., 

Defendant(s). 

Case No. 11 CV 7923 

Judge Andrea R. Wood 

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE 

Judgment is hereby entered (check appropriate box): 

 in favor of plaintiff(s) 

 and against defendant(s) 

 in the amount of $ , 

 

 which includes pre–judgment interest. 

 does not include pre–judgment interest. 

 Post-judgment interest accrues on that amount at the rate provided by law from the date of this judgment. 

 Plaintiff(s) shall recover costs from defendant(s). 

 in favor of defendant(s) 

 and against plaintiff(s) 

.

 Defendant(s) shall recover costs from plaintiff(s). 

 other: Judgment entered in favor of Plaintiffs Danya Davis and Bernessa Wilson and against 

Defendant Packer Engineering, Inc. in the amount of $50,000 each. 

This action was (check one): 

 tried by a jury with Judge Andrea R. Wood presiding, and the jury has rendered a verdict. 

 tried by Judge Andrea R. Wood without a jury and the above decision was reached. 

 decided by Judge Andrea R. Wood on a motion to reduce jury verdict [200]. 

Date: 8/2/2017 Thomas G. Bruton, Clerk of Court 

 Enjoli Fletcher, Deputy Clerk 

Case: 1:11-cv-07923 Document #: 233 Filed: 08/02/17 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:5621
#### The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v Kevin Brown, Respondent.

[831 NYS2d 914]

Appeal by the People from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Mangano, Jr., J.), dated October 26, 2005, which granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss the indictment pursuant to CPL 30.30. Justice Crane has been substituted for former Justice Adams *(see*22 NYCRR 670.1 [c]).

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, the defendant’s motion to dismiss the indictment pursuant to CPL 30.30 is denied as academic, and the indictment is reinstated.

*661In light of our determination in *People v Brown*(39 AD3d 659 [2007] [decided herewith]), reinstating the defendant’s conviction upon his plea of guilty, the defendant’s motion to dismiss the indictment pursuant to CPL 30.30, based upon delay following the Supreme Court’s vacatur of his judgment of conviction on June 8, 2004, has been rendered academic. Crane, J.P., Rivera, Krausman and Florio, JJ., concur.
Certification
 Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes  Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Emerson Radio Corp.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and
the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
   Date:  August 14, 2008
    /s/ Greenfield PittsGreenfield PittsChief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           9,000
<SECURITIES>                                   205,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                  727,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     41,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,042,000
<PP&E>                                       3,985,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,355,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,256,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          584,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        13,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,117,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,256,000
<SALES>                                        746,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               746,000
<CGS>                                          539,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  703,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              14,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 34,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             34,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    34,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .03
        

</TABLE>
#### 1303.104-4 Disclosure, protection and marking of contractor bid or proposal information and source selection information.

Contractor bid or proposal information and source selection information must be protected from unauthorized disclosure in accordance with FAR Parts 3, 14 and 15, and CAM 1315.3.
1404.7003 Exceptions. The following types of publications are excluded from the requirements of this Subpart: ( a ) Internal documents required for administrative or operational purposes that have no public interest, educational, scientific, or research value;
( b ) Classified publications and material otherwise marked prohibiting unauthorized disclosure;
( c ) Tentative drafts such as preliminary planning reports that will appear later in revised or final form;
( d ) Journal and magazine articles; or
( e ) Disclosure materials containing any description, specification, data, plan, or drawing of any unpatented invention upon which a patent application is likely to be filed, unless an opinion by the SOL, or his/her duly authorized designee, has been rendered which finds that the interests of the Government will not be prejudiced by disclosure of such materials.
1

Subject: RE: NCES Study

From: Chip Cameron [mailto:fxcameo@ ] 

Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2013 3:41 PM 

To: Kolotos, John; Rory O'sullivan; Angela Peoples; Warner, Jack; Sandra Kinney; Richard Heath; Glen Gabert; Brian 

Jones; Marc Jerome; Belle Wheelan Private; nharvison@ ; Nassirian, Barmak; Barbara Hoblitzell; Whitney Barkley; 

Kevin Jensen; Mohr, Rhonda (rmohr@ ); Eileen Connor; Margaret Reiter; Tom Tarantino; 

tdalton@ ; Ted Daywalt; Justice, Della (KYOAG); Libby DeBlasio; Jenny Rickard; Helga Greenfield; 

rhiggs@ ; JBerkowitz@ ; Tom Kriger 

Cc: charlie pou; Mahaffie, Lynn; Wilson, Amy 

Subject: Fwd: NCES Study 

Dear Negotiators: 

I am forwarding an email and information from Ray Testa relevant to our upcoming meeting. 

Chip 

---------- Forwarded message ---------- 

From: Raymond Testa <RTesta@ > 

Date: Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 10:16 AM 

Subject: NCES Study 

To: Chip Cameron <fxcameo@ >, "charlie pou (chipbloc@ )" <chipbloc@ > 

Gentlemen, 

Please provide this information to the committee. I believe it is extremely significant as we prepare to discuss 

GE metrics. The extract below is from the key findings in the study and the link below is for the full text.

http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2014/2014011.pdf 

KEY FINDINGS 

• The percentage of recent college graduates who borrowed for their undergraduate education was higher in each successive 

cohort (49, 64, and 66 percent, respectively, among graduates in 1992–93, 1999–2000, and 2007–08), though the difference 

between the first two cohorts was greater than the difference between the middle and latest cohort. Likewise, the average 

cumulative debt (in constant 2009 dollars) from all sources increased in each successive cohort, from $15,000 to $22,400 to 

$24,700. 

• In all three cohorts, the rate of borrowing was highest among students at for-profit institutions (70 to 90 percent). 

• Among students at public and private nonprofit institutions, the most frequent borrowers were lower in-come dependent 

students at private nonprofit institutions (70 to 80 percent borrowed) for all three cohorts. 

• Proportionately fewer borrowers in the latest cohort (2009) were in re-payment 1 year after graduation than were their 

counterparts in 1994 and 2001 (60 vs. 65 and 66 percent, respectively). 

• Also in 2009, a larger percentage (31 percent) of graduates in repayment faced high monthly loan payments (greater than 

12 percent of their monthly income), than their counterparts in 1994 and 2001 (22 and 18 percent, respectively). 
2

• Levels of student debt were not consistently associated with students’ subsequent graduate school enrollment or living 

arrangements with parents 1 year after graduation. Instead, both experiences varied with cohort year; graduate school 

enrollment was highest in 2009 (the year after the economic recession began), and moving back home to live with parents 

(among students age 24 or younger) was higher in both 1994 and 2009 (27 percent) than in 2001 (18 percent 

 

 

RAYMOND TESTA

Vice President - Government Relations & Compliance

tel:

fax:

48 Macleod Lane

Bloomfield, NJ 07003

www.empire.edu

Confidentiality
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 4.2

Eastern Division

Deckers Outdoor Corporation

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:11−cv−07970

Honorable Ronald A. Guzman

DOES 102−500, et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Wednesday, December 14, 2011:

 MINUTE entry before Honorable Martin C. Ashman: Enter Report and

Recommendation. The Court hereby recommends that Decker's motion for preliminary

injunction [28] be granted in part and denied in part. Mailed notice(tlp, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:11-cv-07970 Document #: 36 Filed: 12/14/11 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:668
17'' 1 MATT H ATCH ETT REPRE SENTA T IVE . DISTRI CT 150 100 CANTERBURY ROAD DUBLIN . GEORGIA 31021 

# :J{ouse of 9{epresentatives STANDING COMITTEES :

E-MAIL: matt.hatchett @house.ga.gov

The Honorable Anthony R. Foxx Secretary ofTransportation US Department ofTransportation 1200 New Jersey Ave SE Washington, DC 20590 The Honorable John F. Kerry Secretary of State US Department of State 2201 C Street NW Washington, DC 20520 Secretaries Foxx and Kerry: MAJORITY CAUCUS CHAIRMAN 415 ST ATE CAPITOL ATLANTA, GEORGIA30334 (404) 656-5025 (404) 657-8278 (FAX) APPROPRIATIONS-PUB LIC SAFETY ENERGY , UTILITIES & TELECOMMUN ICATIONS HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES ECONOMIC DEVELOPM E NT & TOURISM April 29, 2015

Here in Georgia we play by the rules and a deal is a deal. If someone gets a 5 minute head start in a race, that's breaking the rules. I believe in fair competition and I believe a deal is a deal. I'm bothered by recent reports that the United Arab Emirates and Qatar are providing massive subsidies to their airline carriers. These subsidies have essentially given their airlines-Qatar Airways, Etihad Airways, Emirates Airline-a 5 minute head start and created an un-level playing field for other airline carriers. This includes Delta Air Lines, a company that employs over 33,000 jobs throughout the peach state. With Delta Air Lines being the largest private employer in Georgia and the Atlanta Hartsfield Airport being the busiest airport in the world, our state has a lot at stake should these rules continue to be broken . And, with the Gulf carriers expanding into U.S. markets at such a rapid rate due to the $42 billion in subsidies and other unfair benefits they have received over the past ten years from their governments, it is likely that the U.S. will lose out on key flight routes and that the people and businesses in Georgia who rely on a robust airline industry for their livelihood will be short changed . It's time for the Unit ed Arab Emirates and Qatar to play by the rules they agreed upon when they signed the Open Skies agreements with the United States. I ask that you p open direct consultations with Qatar and the UAE.on this matter. A deal is a deal. Thank you for your attention to this important issue.

# Sincer**~,-** J. Matthew Hatchett 

# s 10-150505-026

# House of !l?g.presentatives Jil.tfanta, yeorgia MATT HATCHETT Representative, District 143 100 Canterbury Rd. Dublin, GA 31021



# s 10-150505-026 The Honorable Anthony R. Foxx Secretary ofTransportation U S Department ofTransportation 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE Washington, DC 20590 Hasler 04/29/2015 

### US POSTAGE '

:2 0590 1,

## •II'•lui• 1 111, 11111,, 1 11 1

•11 

### "II' 1 111 1 ,

### J1 1

## 1'•,,, 11 11 

## •'hl'll'l 

# $00 .482 ZIP 30334 011011642736
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
[LEGEND]
THIS SCHEDULE HAS BEEN RESTATED TO REFLECT THE COMPANY'S ADOPTION OF 
STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING STANDARDS NO. 128, "EARNINGS PER SHARE" 
(FAS 128) AND CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE 
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN THE COMPANY'S FORM 
10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1997, AND THE QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA 
FROM THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997, AND ARE
QUALIFIED IN THEIR ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND THE 
NOTES THERETO.
[/LEGEND]
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         207,731
<SECURITIES>                                   949,158
<RECEIVABLES>                                  209,622<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0<F1>
<INVENTORY>                                     99,667
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,041,072
<PP&E>                                         981,366
<DEPRECIATION>                                 347,424
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,331,282
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          248,952
<BONDS>                                        150,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,463
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,904,347
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,331,282
<SALES>                                        299,231
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               490,778
<CGS>                                           53,252
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   53,252
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               233,633
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0<F1>
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,904
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 76,935
<INCOME-TAX>                                    21,542
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             55,393
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    55,393
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.45<F2><F3>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.44<F3>
<FN>
<F1>ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE ARE PRESENTED NET OF ALLOWANCE FOR DOUBTFUL ACCOUNTS IN
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET.  THE PROVISION FOR LOSSES ON DOUBTFUL
ACCOUNTS IS NOT REPORTED AS A SEPARATE LINE IN THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF INCOME OR STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS. 
<F2>REPRESENTS BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE.
<F3>RESTATED TO REFLECT THE COMPANY'S ADOPTION OF FAS 128.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
# FALLS THIEF RI

REG I ONAL
February 27 , 2014 ;. ' j ~\
. r , -~ :.::. ! . ~ \ - ~ . Dennis J . De V any , Chief Essential Air Service Division Office of Aviation Analy sis Mr . DeVany , On February 5 , 2014 Great Lakes Aviation , Ltd . submitted a proposal to continue service to Thief River Falls , MN . The new contract , which would extend for two years starting June 1 , 2014, included three service options. The first option is to provide two roundtrips daily to Minneapolis/St . Paul utilizing a Beech 1900D aircraft configured to nine seats. The second option calls for two one-stop roundtrips daily to Denver utilizing the Embraer 120 configured to 30 seats. It is our understanding that these two options may also be combined to provide a third option, one daily roundtrip to Minneapolis/St . Paul and one daily roundtrip to Denver utilizing the Beech 1900D and Embraer 120 respectively. After careful consideration the Thief River Falls Regional Airport Authority has decided to recommend Great Lakes Avi ation begin service under the third option identified above. It is the Airport Authority ' s belief that by offering multiple destinations to hub airports , travelers will receive better access to the national air transportation network . The Airport Authority ' s recommendation does not come without concern. First and foremost is Great Lakes Aviation's ability to achieve 98 % reliability as identified in its proposal . As we have seen, Great Lakes Aviation is currently experiencing a severe pilot shortage , causing the reliability of its air service to sink below 40 % in January 2014 . Service was altogether suspended February 1 , 2014 , until such time the Airline can rebuild its pilot crews and resume service under a 135 split operating certificate . While the Airport Authority looks forward to the day service can be restored , we feel it would be counterproductive to begin service should anything less than 95% of scheduled flights be completed. Even then it will take many months if not years to rebuild the confidence our travelers have in the carrier . For this reason the Airport Authority wishes to reserve the right to rebid our route should service not resume by June I , 2014 or should reliability dip below reasonable levels once service has resumed . Additionally the Airport Authority is concerned that a FAA requirement to physically remove seats from Great Lakes ' aircraf t prior to commencing a 135 operation is arbitrarily placing a burden on the Airline . We believe this mandate will only further delay the return of air service to Thief River Falls and make the transition back to a 121 operation more difficult once qualified First Officers are available. Respectfully, 

# ;g fI/ ~

~ iCk , Airport Manager 13 7 2 2 A ir port Dr i ve 

### P .O
. B ox 67 2 Thi ef Ri ver Fa l ls, I'v 1 f\J 5 6 7 0 '1 2 1 8 - 68 1 -768 0 vvwvv . trfai rport . (0 I II trfai rp ort@ m nc ablc . nct
#### 15.401 Definitions.

As used in this subpart—

*Price* means cost plus any fee or profit applicable to the contract type.

*Subcontract* (except as used in 15.407-2) also includes a transfer of commercial products or commercial services between divisions, subsidiaries, or affiliates of a contractor or a subcontractor (10 U.S.C. 3701(2) and 41 U.S.C. 3501(a)(2).

[62 FR 51230, Sept. 30, 1997, as amended at 66 FR 2129, Jan. 10, 2001; 66 FR 65369, Dec. 18, 2001; 79 FR 24201, Apr. 29, 2014; 86 FR 61026, Nov. 4, 2021; 87 FR 73897, Dec. 1, 2022]
<PAGE>   1
                                                                     EXHIBIT 4.4

                              CERTIFICATE OF TRUST
                                       OF
                               COX RADIO TRUST I


         THIS CERTIFICATE OF TRUST of Cox Radio Trust I (the "Trust"), dated as
of November 2, 1999, is being duly executed and filed by the undersigned, as
trustees, to form a business trust under the Delaware Business Trust Act (12
Del. C. ss. 3801, et seq.) (the "Act").

         (i) Name. The name of the business trust being formed hereby is Cox
Radio Trust I.

         (ii) Delaware Trustee. The name and business address of the trustee of
the Trust in the State of Delaware are The Bank of New York (Delaware), White
Clay Center, Route 273, Newark, Delaware 19711, Attention: Corporate Trust
Administration.

         (iii) Effective Date. This Certificate of Trust shall be effective as
of its filing with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, being the trustees of the Trust,
have duly executed this Certificate of Trust in accordance with Section
3811(a)(1) of the Act as of the date first above written.



                                  THE BANK OF NEW YORK, as trustee


                                  By:      /s/  Marie E. Trimboli
                                          -------------------------------------
                                          Name:   Marie E. Trimboli
                                          Title:  Assistant Treasurer



                                  THE BANK OF NEW YORK (DELAWARE), as trustee


                                  By:      /s/ Frederick W. Clark
                                          -------------------------------------
                                          Name:   Frederick W. Clark
                                          Title:  Authorized Signatory
1846.7000 Scope of subpart. This subpart implements section 823(c), the NASA Transition Authorization Act of 2017 (Pub. L. 115-10). ( a ) Prescribes policy and procedures for preventing counterfeit electronic parts and suspect counterfeit electronic parts from entering the supply chain when procuring electronic parts or end items, components, parts, or assemblies that contain electronic parts; and
( b ) Applies to electronic parts when their presence in the NASA supply chain poses a danger to United States government astronauts, crew, and other personnel and a risk to the agency overall.
( c ) Contracting officers, in consultation with the requiring activity, are responsible for making a determination concerning the applicability of this section and the appropriate use of the prescribed contract clauses.