alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Vincent Astor Williams, Appellant, v. Edward M. Fay, as Warden of Green Haven Prison, Respondent.

In a habeas corpus proceeding, relator appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, dated May 2, 1963, which dismissed the writ after a hearing and remanded him to the custody of respondent. Order affirmed, without costs. The relator was sentenced to consecutive terms on conviction of the crimes of kidnapping and robbery. Relator contends that the indictments on which he was found guilty charge the commission of a single act or wrong and, hence, under section 1938 of the Penal Law the sentences should have been concurrent. In our opinion, the act alleged in the indictments, on which the relator was convicted, comprise separate and different crimes. Hence, the direction that the sentence imposed for each crime shall be served consecutively was valid (see Penal Law, § 2190, subd. 4). Ughetta, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld, Brennan, Hill and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
#### DAVIE v. HEAL et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

November 13, 1903.)

Action by James W. B. Davie against Peter P. Heal and others.

No opinion. Motion denied.
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

Laws & GuidanceGENERAL

About FOIA | About the Privacy Act | **FOIA Reading Rooms**Making a Request | FAQs | Contacts | Links

## FOIA e-Reading Room

### Institute of Education Sciences (IES) Frequently Requested Information

#### Grant Applications

The grant applications posted in the E-FOIA Reading Room are provided as a courtesy. Because the documents have been produced by entities outside of the U.S. Department of Education who are not subject to the Department's standards for the accessibility of documents posted on the Internet, this material may not be accessible to individuals with disabilities.

In addition, the process of redaction and image scanning may further hamper the accessibility of these documents.

If you need assistance with these documents, please contact the FOIA Service Center by email at EDFOIAManager@ed.gov or call 202-401-8365.
                - Statewide Longitudinal Data Systems Grants

Further information on IES programs.

----

 

 Printable view

## How Do I Find...

          - Student loans, forgiveness
          - College accreditation
          - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
          - FERPA
          - FAFSA
          - 1098, tax forms

More >

## Information About...

          - Transforming Teaching
          - Family and Community Engagement
          - Early Learning

 

|  |
|--|
|  |
|  | No Related Topics Found |  |
|  |

----

*Our mission*

Student Loans
Repaying LoansDefaulted LoansLoan ForgivenessLoan Servicers

Grants & Programs
Apply for Pell GrantsGrants ForecastApply for a GrantEligibility for Grants

Laws & Guidance
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)FERPACivil RightsNew IDEA Website

Data & Research
Education StatisticsPostsecondary Education DataED Data ExpressNation's Report CardWhat Works Clearinghouse

About Us
Contact UsED OfficesJobsPress ReleasesFAQsRecursos en españolBudget, PerformancePrivacy ProgramSubscribe to E-Mail Updates

----

          - Notices
          - FOIA
          - Privacy Policy
          - Accessibility
          - Security
          - Information quality
          - Inspector General
          - Whitehouse.gov
          - USA.gov
          - Benefits.gov
          - Regulations.gov
### §6203. Issuance of orders

#### (a) In general

Subject to this chapter, and to effectuate the declared purposes of this chapter, the Secretary shall issue and, from time to time, amend lime research, promotion, and consumer information orders applicable to handlers, producers, producer-handlers, and importers of limes. Any such order shall be national in scope. Not more than one order shall be in effect under this chapter at any one time.

#### (b) Procedure

#### (1) Proposal for issuance of order

Any person that will be affected by this chapter may request the issuance of, and submit a proposal for, an order under this chapter.

#### (2) Proposed order

Not later than 60 days after the receipt of a request and proposal by an interested person for an order, the Secretary shall publish a proposed order and give due notice and opportunity for public comment on the proposed order.

#### (3) Issuance of order

After notice and opportunity for public comment are given, as provided in paragraph (2), the Secretary shall issue an order, taking into consideration the comments received and including in the order provisions necessary to ensure that the order is in conformity with the requirements of this chapter.

#### (4) Effective date of order

Such order shall be issued and become effective not later than 150 days following publication of the proposed order.

#### (c) Amendments

The Secretary, from time to time, may amend any order issued under this section. The provisions of this chapter applicable to orders shall be applicable to amendments to orders.

(Pub. L. 101–624, title XIX, §1954, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 3872.)
#### In the Matter of William F. Martin, as Director of Public Welfare of the Monroe County Public Welfare District, Respondent, against Ronald C. Zinn, Appellant.

Orders unanimously affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. (Appeal from two orders of Monroe Children’s Court: (1) adjudging defendant to be the natural father" of the child born to the complainant, and (2) adjudging that defendant pay for the support of said child.) Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Halpern, McClusky and Henry, JJ.
EXHIBIT
      10.9

    STONELEIGH
      PARTNERS ACQUISITION CORP.

    


     

    ______________,
      2006

    


    PLM
      International Inc.

    555
      Fifth Avenue

    New York,
      New York 10017

    


    Gentlemen:

    


    This
      letter will confirm our agreement that, commencing on the effective date
      (“Effective Date”) of the registration statement for the initial public offering
      of the securities of Stoneleigh Partners Acquisition Corp. (“Company”) and
      continuing until (the “Termination Date”) the earlier of the consummation by the
      Company of a “Business Combination” or the Company’s liquidation, PLM
      International Inc. shall make available to the Company certain office and
      administrative services as may be required by the Company from time to time,
      situated at 555 Fifth Avenue, New York, New York 10017. In exchange therefore,
      the Company shall pay PLM International Inc. the sum of $7,500 per month on
      the
      Effective Date and continuing monthly thereafter until the Termination
      Date.

     

    


    Very
      truly yours,

     

    STONELEIGH
      PARTNERS ACQUISITION CORP.

     

     

    By:________________________________

    Name:

    Title:

    
       

    

    


    AGREED
      TO
      AND ACCEPTED BY:

    


    PLM
      INTERNATIONAL INC.

    


    By:
      ________________________________

           Name:
      

           Title:
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

Laws & GuidanceELEMENTARY & SECONDARY EDUCATION
| Editor's Picks                                                                 |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                     |
|                                                                                     | |							 1 |							2 |							3 |							4 |							5 | |  |
|                                                                                     |
| 1 - 10 of 482 Shown			Articles per page  				10 | 				25  | 				50 |
Exhibit
32(e)








CERTIFICATION
FURNISHED PURSUANT TO




18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,




AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q of Florida Power Corporation (the “Company”) for the period ending
September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jeffrey J. Lyash, President and Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)           the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)           the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.











U/s/ Jeffrey J.
Lyash


Jeffrey
J. Lyash


President
and Chief Executive Officer


November
5, 2008








This
certification is being furnished and shall not be deemed filed by the Company
for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
or incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, or the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Louis Levine, Appellant. The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Ole Nost, Appellant. The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. John O’Laughlin, Appellant.

Appeals by defendants from judgments of the former Court of Special Sessions of the City of New York, Borough of Queens, rendered February 27, 1962 after a nonjury trial, convicting them of violation of section 81.07 of the New York City Health Code, and imposing a $50 fine upon each defendant. Judgments reversed on the law and the facts; information dismissed; and fines directed to be remitted, The defendants who are store managers, were found to have violated said section of the New York City Health Code upon proof that they displayed barbecued chicken, and fried fish fillet in store windows without refrigeration. The said section provides that: “Readily perishable foods, unless otherwise provided shall be kept at all times under appropriate heat treatment or at a temperature no higher than 50 [degrees] F. in order to prevent spoilage or the growth of pathogenic organisms.” In our opinion, the proof on this record is insufficient to establish beyond a reasonable doubt the guilt of the defendants of the crime charged. Beldoek, P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Brennan, JJ., concur.
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

About EDOFFICES

The U.S. Department will consider, on a State-by-State basis, requests for flexibility in two areas: the timeline for using results of teacher and principal evaluation and support systems that meet the requirements of Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) flexibility for personnel decisions, and field testing new assessments aligned to college- and career-ready standards.

-  Secretary’s June 18 Announcement Letter  
-  Fact Sheet     (WORD) 
- "Home-Room "  Blog 

Teacher and Principal Evaluation and Support Systems Flexibility

                -  Joint RTT/ESEA Flexibility Optional Submission     (Template)
                -   Assistant Secretary's August 2, 2013 Letter  
                -  Joint RTT/ESEA Flexibility Optional Submission     (Template)
                -  Frequently Asked Questions      (WORD)                   Webinar (11/7/13) 
PDF [94 KB]
Audio [231 KB]     Field Testing Flexibility   -  Assistant Secretary's September 17,  2013 Letter 
- Frequently Asked Questions      (WORD)
- Overview Webinar (10/31/13)      (MS PowerPoint)    Audio  
- Optional Field Testing Flexibility Request Template 
Flexibility States 
 (WORD)
Non-Flexibility States 
 (WORD)
 Printable view
  Last Modified: 03/11/2014
How Do I Find...- Student loans, forgiveness
- College accreditation
- Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
- FERPA
- FAFSA
- 1098, tax forms

More >
Information About...- Transforming Teaching
- Family and Community Engagement
- Early Learning

 
OIG HotlineOIG Reports and PublicationsAbout the OIG
*Our mission* is to promote student achievement and preparation for global competitiveness by fostering educational excellence and ensuring equal access.
Student Loans
Repaying LoansDefaulted LoansLoan ForgivenessLoan Servicers
Grants & Programs
Apply for Pell GrantsGrants ForecastApply for a GrantEligibility for Grants
Laws & Guidance
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)FERPACivil RightsNew IDEA Website
Data & Research
Education StatisticsPostsecondary Education DataED Data ExpressNation's Report CardWhat Works Clearinghouse
About Us
Contact UsED OfficesJobsPress ReleasesFAQsRecursos en españolBudget, PerformancePrivacy ProgramSubscribe to E-Mail Updates- Notices
- FOIA
- Privacy Policy
- Accessibility
- Security
- Information quality
- Inspector General
- Whitehouse.gov
- USA.gov
- Benefits.gov
- Regulations.gov
#### In the Matter of the Estate of Jennie B. White, Deceased. Claribel S. Rockefeller et al., Appellants, Carrie Bradley, Respondent.

Decrees insofar as appealed from unanimously affirmed, without costs of this appeal to any' party. (Appeal by petitioner, Claribel S. Rockefeller and two distributees, from part of two decrees of Herkimer Surrogate’s Court appointing a eoadministratrix.) Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Goldman, Halpern and McClusky, JJ.
203.104-4 Disclosure, protection, and marking of contractor bid or proposal information and source selection information. ( d ) (3) For purposes of FAR 3.104-4(d)(3) only, DoD follows the notification procedures in FAR 27.404-5(a). However, FAR 27.404-5(a)(1) does not apply to DoD.
[74 FR 2409, Jan. 15, 2009]
#### 1341.202 Procedures.

The designee authorized to approve a determination that a written contract cannot be obtained from a utility supplier refusing to execute a tendered contract, and that the issuance of a purchase order is not feasible, is set forth in CAM 1301.70.
July 28, 2015

Robert Olson

Digital Technologies, Inc.

31876 Castlewood Court

Pequot Lakes, MN 56472

Dear Mr. Olson:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It 

explains why we cannot process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Cannot Process Your Request

We entered your May 15, 2015 exemption request on behalf of Digital Technologies, Inc into 

the public docket (No. FAA-2015-1691), but we are unable to process your request any 

further. The information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy 

enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief and the extent of 

the relief you seek.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.
2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-4264.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brittany Newton 

Program Analyst, Aircraft and 

 Airport Rules Division

Enclosure
#### 209.170 Restriction on the use of certain institutions of higher education.
Case: 1:12-cv-01612 Document #: 66 Filed: 06/05/13 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:242

Case: 1:12-cv-01612 Document #: 66 Filed: 06/05/13 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:243

Case: 1:12-cv-01612 Document #: 66 Filed: 06/05/13 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:244
#### Merle Lefkowitz v. Sheila Grosswald.

Motion for a stay of the order of commitment granted, but otherwise without restriction on plaintiff’s right to enforce such order, and upon condition that defendant submit to examination by plaintiff on three days’ notice of her assets and disposition of her assets, and upon the further condition that the appellant procures the record on appeal and appellant’s points to be served and filed on or before April 19, 1962, with notice of argument for May 1, 1962, said appeal to be argued or submitted when reached. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, Valente, McNally and Eager, JJ.
ORDERADOPTING CHANGES TO REGULATIONS OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION The attached fourteen pages ofregulations, dealing with air quality permit administration fees, emission fees and negotiated service agreements are hereby adopted and certified to be a correct copy ofthe regulation changes that the Department ofEnvironmental Conservation adopts under the authority ofAS 46.03 and AS 46.14 and after compliance with the Administrative Procedure Act (AS 44.62), specifically including notice under AS 44.62.190 and 44.62.200 and opportunity for public comment under AS 44.62.210. This action is not expected to require an increased appropriation.
In considering public comments, the Department of Environmental Conservation paid special attention to the cost to private persons ofthe regulatory action being taken. The Department of Environmental Conservation also gave special attention to alternate practical methods in this regulatory action, as required by AS 46.03.024. The regulation changes adopted under this order take effect on the 30th day after they have been filed by the lieutenant governor as provided in AS 44.62.180.

DATE: August 7, 2015 Anchorage, Alaska

# ~~**ner** Department ofEnvironmental Conservation

FILING CERTIFICATION 

## v



## 5;c.ot**Mu;w~ter** 

## {;'.- I, Byron Mallott, Lieutenant Governor for the State ofAlaska, certify that on

### AIA~u.sf 

## 'J..7 2015, at 

### {D:O{,o...m., I filed the attached regulations according to the provisions ofAS 44.62.040

- 44.62.120.

Effective: Register:

# <;;'ffevnh~r 2.6 1 

## 2015 ) tS, 

# Ov../r,ber ..2or5 ' Byron Mallott, Lieutenant GovernorFORDELEGATION OFTHE LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR'S AUTHORITY

I, BYRON MALLOTT, LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OFALASKA, designate the following state employee to perform the Administrative Procedures Act filing functions ofthe Office ofthe Lieutenant Governor:

Scott Meriwether, Special Assistant

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have signed and affixed the Seal ofthe State of Alaska, in Juneau, on December 2nd, 2014.

# ·······**~~ ·················**  BYRON MALLOTT LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23-6216

RAYMOND IDEMUDIA AIGBEKAEN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. 

James K. Bredar, Chief District Judge. (1:21-cv-02890-JKB)

Submitted: January 18, 2024 Decided: February 16, 2024

Before WYNN and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and MOTZ, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Raymond Idemudia Aigbekaen, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 23-6216 Doc: 12 Filed: 02/16/2024 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Raymond Idemudia Aigbekaen appeals the district court’s order denying his motion 

under Fed. R. Crim. P. 41(g) for the return of property seized during his criminal 

investigation. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we 

affirm the district court’s order. Aigbekaen v. United States, No. 1:21-cv-02890-JKB (D. 

Md. Jan. 31, 2023). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

USCA4 Appeal: 23-6216 Doc: 12 Filed: 02/16/2024 Pg: 2 of 2
#### 1252.222-70 Strikes or Picketing Affecting Timely Completion of the Contract Work.

As prescribed in 1222.101-71(a), insert the following clause:

# Strikes or Picketing Affecting Timely Completion of the Contract Work (NOV 2022)

Notwithstanding any other provision hereof, the Contractor is responsible for delays arising out of labor disputes, including but not limited to strikes, if such strikes are reasonably avoidable. A delay caused by a strike or by picketing which constitutes an unfair labor practice is not excusable unless the Contractor takes all reasonable and appropriate action to end such a strike or picketing, such as the filing of a charge with the National Labor Relations Board, the use of other available Government procedures, and the use of private boards or organizations for the settlement of disputes.

(End of clause)
**Exhibit 23.2**

 

**Consent of IndependentAuditors**

 

 

We consent to the incorporationby reference in the Registration Statements Nos. 33-42214, 33-98160, 333-80857and 333-80843 on Form S-8 of Axcess International, Inc. (formerly Axcess Inc.)of our report dated April 10, 2002, with respect to the consolidated financialstatements of Axcess International, Inc. (formerly Axcess Inc.) as December 31,2001 and for the year then ended included in its Annual Report (Form 10-KSB)for the year ended December 31, 2002.

 

 
|            | /s/ Ernst  & Young LLP |   |
|-----------------|----------------------------|--------|
| Dallas,  Texas  |
| April 15,  2003 |

 

----
#### 206.302-3 Industrial mobilization, engineering, developmental, or research capability, or expert services.