alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Issue Paper 2

# Session 1:  January 12 -14, 2015

**Issue:**Time period for availability of Borrower Defense to Repayment claims

**Statutory cites:**§455(h) of the Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended, 20 U.S.C. 1087e(h)

**Regulatory cites:**34 CFR 685.206(c) 

**Summary of issue:**

The current regulation is silent on the timeframe during which a borrower may bring a Direct Loan Defense to Repayment (DTR) claim and provides a three-year period during which the Department of Education (Department) may recover the amount of loss on a loan due to a successful DTR claim from a school.

Public commenters have suggested that “since there is no statute of limitations on Federal student loan collection, no state or Federal statutes of limitations should bar a borrower from establishing a defense to repayment.”  While the Department has the authority to adopt a new Federal time period for DTR claims on new Direct Loans, this is not currently an open issue for DTR claims related to existing Direct Loans or for Federal Family Education Loans, which will be governed by the current regulation .

Questions to be considered by the negotiating committee if the Department seeks to establish a time limitation for the availability of borrower DTR claims include:

1. Should the regulations address a limitation period for borrowers to bring DTR claims?  What limitation period should apply?  Should the limitation period differ for different kinds of claims, based on a new Federal standard(s), state law-based claims, or both?  

2. What is the “trigger” date from which such a limitation period for borrowers to bring DTR claims should run? What, if any, circumstances would warrant tolling (extending) the limitation period? 

3. The current Direct Loan rule provides that the Department will not pursue recovery against the school for the amount of loss on a loan later than three years after the last year in which the student last attended the school.  34 CFR §685.206(c).  This limitation period was derived from the rule requiring schools to retain records of “administration” of title IV programs for at least three years following the last award year in which the student attended the school or aid was provided.  34 CFR 668.24(d).  Borrower DTR claims, however, will ordinarily arise not from the calculation and award of title IV aid, but rather from certain acts or omissions by a school for which Department regulations impose no record retention requirements.   What, if any, limitation period should apply for the Department to assert a recovery claim against a school (e.g., the routine title IV aid record retention period, as in the current version of §685.206? Some other period?)
Exhibit 32.1





Certification of the President and Chief Executive Officer


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the


Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





I, Bowen S. Diehl, President and Chief Executive Officer of Capital Southwest Corporation, certify that, to my knowledge:


1The Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2019, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 6, 2019 (“accompanied report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


2The information contained in the accompanied report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of Capital Southwest Corporation.





Date:  August 6, 2019By:/s/ Bowen S. DiehlBowen S. DiehlPresident and Chief Executive Officer
#### 1401.603-2 Selection.

COs, regardless of series or organizational placement, must be certified at a level commensurate with their appointment level, as prescribed in the Department's Federal Acquisition Certification in Contracting (FAC-C) Program Manual. Director, PAM, is the approving authority for all new and reinstated FAC-C certifications. BPCs are authorized to approve renewal FAC-C certifications.
1532.170 Forms. ( a ) EPA Form 1900-10 Contractor's Cumulative Claim and Reconciliation, at 1553.232-74, shall be used for an accounting of the cumulative charges and costs for cost-reimbursement contracts from inception of the contract to completion. It shall be submitted by the Contractor upon submission of the completion voucher.
( b ) EPA Form 1900-68, Notice of Contract Costs Suspended and/or Disallowed, at 1553.232-75, shall be inserted in all cost-reimbursement type and fixed-rate type contracts.
[49 FR 8858, Mar. 8, 1984, as amended at 61 FR 29317, June 10, 1996]
1517.208 Solicitation provisions and contract clauses. ( a ) The Contracting Officer shall insert the provision at 48 CFR 1552.217-70, Evaluation of Contract Options, in solicitations containing options.
( b ) The Contracting Officer shall insert the clause at 48 CFR 1552.217-71, Option to Extend the Term of the Contract—Cost-Type Contract, when applicable.
( c ) The Contracting Officer shall insert the clause at 48 CFR 1552.217-72, Option to Extend the Term of the Contract—Cost-Plus-Award-Fee Contract, when applicable.
( d ) The Contracting Officer shall insert the clause at 48 CFR 1552.217-73, Option for Increased Quantity—Cost-Type Contract, when applicable.
( e ) The Contracting Officer shall insert the clause at 48 CFR 1552.217-74, Option for Increased Quantity—Cost-Plus-Award-Fee Contract, when applicable.
( f ) The Contracting Officer shall insert the clause at 48 CFR 1552.217-75, Option to Extend the Effective Period of the Contract—Time and Materials or Labor Hour Contract, when applicable.
( g ) The Contracting Officer shall insert the clause at 48 CFR 1552.217-76, Option to Extend the Effective Period of the Contract—Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity Contract, when applicable.
( h ) The Contracting officer shall insert the clause at 48 CFR 1552.217-77, Option to Extend the Term of the Contract—Fixed Price, when applicable.
[82 FR 33019, July 19, 2017]
#### Lucy Greene v. Herbert Greene.

Motion for reargument denied. That branch of the moti'oh seeking leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals is dismissed on the ground that said court is without jurisdiction to entertain such an appeal. *(People ex rel. Grissler*v. *Fowler,*55 N. Y. 675; *Rowe*v. *De Loca,*260 N. Y. 569.) Concur — Botein, P. J., Valente, McNally, Stevens and Eager, JJ.
###### Editorial Note on Part 1953

#### Editorial Note:

IAAR forms referenced in this subpart do not appear in the Code of Federal Regulations. The list of forms following 1953.370 is set forth for the convenience of the user. Forms may be obtained by writing: Office of Contracts, The Broadcasting Board of Governors, Washington, DC 20547.

#### 1953.300 Scope of subpart.

This subpart contains illustrations of some forms referenced in this IAAR.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CertificationPursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of

theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

I, Raymond F. Lancy,Chief Financial Officer of Bridgford Foods Corporation (the “Company”),certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, that:

 

(1)           theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period endedApril 14, 2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or780(d)); and

 

(2)           theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Dated: May 30,  2006 | /s/     Raymond  F. Lancy |   |
|---------------------------|----------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                      | Raymond F. Lancy,  Chief Financial                 |
|                      | Officer                                            |
|                      | (Principal Financial  Officer)                     |

 

----
*

Overview of Draft Gainful Employment Regulation 

Negotiated Rulemaking Session 3

Draft for discussion purposes 12.11.13

Draft for discussion purposes 12.11.13

*

*

Draft for discussion purposes 12.11.13

Negotiated Rulemaking Session 3, cont.

Draft for discussion purposes 12.11.13

*
Name Company

1 Alan W. Perdue IAFC

2 Andrew Sullivan Liebherr Refigeration

3 Barry Kalian UL

4 Bruce E Johnson Interational Code Council

5 Check Schlosser Manitowoc Ice

6 Christianna Papazahariou Shecco

7 Cindy Newberg U.S. EPA

8 Claire Kammer UL

9 Claudette Juska Greenpeace

10 Dave Godwin U.S. EPA

11 Ed Altizer Virginia State Fire Marshal & IFMA

12 Evelyn Swain U.S. EPA

13 Glenn Hourahan ACCA

14 James Douglas Tecumseh Products Company

15 Jeff Staub Danfoss

16 Jim Flowers Linde Canada

17 Karim Amrane AHRI

18 Kevin Messner AHAM

19 Lasse Lynne Espersen Nestle

UL Flammable Refrigerant Forum Attendees

January 11, 2011

20 Marc Scancarello Emerson Climate Technologies

21 Margaret Sheppard U.S. EPA

22 Matt Williams AHAM

23 Monica Shimamura U.S. EPA

24 Patrick Walsh AHAM

25 Phillip Hohnson McQuay International

26 Rafael Sanchez EPA, OECA, Office of Compliance

27 Randy Haseman UL

28 Reinhold Resch AHT Cooling Systems Austria

29 Robert Wilkins Danfoss

30 Roy Deppa National Association of State Fire Marshals

31 Scott Ayers US Consumer Product Safety Commission

32 Scott MacLeod UL

33 Sonny G. Sundaresan Sundaresan Consulting Services, LLC

34 Tom Blewitt UL
**EXHIBIT      10.16**

----

----

**AMENDMENT      TO**

**ASSET      SALE AGREEMENT**

----

*[signatures      follow]*

----

**IN      WITNESS WHEREOF**

**                                ACCESS      PHARMACEUTICALS**
**, INC.**

**                                ULURU,      INC.**

**                               **
U.S. Department of Education 

Negotiated Rulemaking 

1990 K Street, N.W., 8th Floor Conference Center 

Washington, D.C. 

Team I – General/Lender Loan Issues 

February 23 & 24, 2009, 9:00 a.m. – 5:00 p.m. 

February 25, 2009, 9:00 a.m. – 12:00 p.m. 

Agenda*

Welcome 

Introductions

Overview of the Negotiated Rulemaking Process 

Review and Adopt Protocols 

Petitions for Membership 

Overview of the General/Lender Loan Issues 

Review Agenda of Issues to be Negotiated 

Workshop-Style Review of Issues 

1. Determining Borrower Eligibility for In-School Deferment 

2. Borrower Notification When the Transfer, Sale, or Assignment of a Loan Results 

in a Change in the Party to Whom Payments Must be Sent 

3. Lender and Guaranty Agency Prohibited Inducements 

4. Lender Forebearance and Borrower Contact Requirements 

5. Applicability of the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act to FFEL and Direct Loan 

Borrowers and related FFEL Lender Special Allowance Payment Calculations 

6. Guaranty Agency Notifications to Borrowers in Default; Financial and Economic 

Literacy for Rehabilitated Borrowers 

7. PLUS Loan Deferments and Interest Capitalization 

 

* Time will be made available for public comment during the meeting. 

2/17/2009 
8. Consolidation Loan Borrower Eligibility and Applicant Disclosures 

9. Consumer Credit Reporting After Loan Rehabilitation; Eligibility for Loan 

Rehabilitation 

10. FFEL and Direct Loan Teacher Loan Forgiveness 

11. Required Education Loan Borrower Disclosures by FFEL Lenders 

12. Consumer Education Information Provided by Guaranty Agencies 

13. New Audit Requirement for FFEL School Lenders and Eligible Lender Trustees 

(ELTs) Originating FFEL Loans for an Institution or School-Affiliated 

Organization 

14. Loan Discharges Based on Total and Permanent Disability 

15. Required Education Loan Borrower Disclosures by Lenders 

Logistics 

Schedule of future meetings 

Identify additional information needs

Next Steps 

Draft Regulatory Text 

Agenda for Meeting 2: March 30 – April 1, 2009 

Meeting Summary 

Other 

 

2/17/2009
|  |  |
|--|--|

**TSW Study Home****TS&W Final Report****Working Papers****Impact Analysis Areas****What's             New**
FHWA Home | Policy Home | HPTS Home | FeedbackUnited States Department of Transportation - **Federal Highway Administration**
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 834 

To authorize the appropriation of funds to the Centers for Disease Control 

and Prevention for conducting or supporting research on firearms safety 

or gun violence prevention. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 5 (legislative day, APRIL 4), 2017 

Mr. MARKEY (for himself, Mr. SCHUMER, Mrs. GILLIBRAND, Mr. DURBIN, 

Mr. WHITEHOUSE, Mr. REED, Mr. BLUMENTHAL, Ms. WARREN, Ms. 

DUCKWORTH, Mr. CASEY, Mrs. MURRAY, Mr. WYDEN, Mr. MURPHY, Mr. 

KAINE, Mr. SANDERS, Mr. SCHATZ, Ms. HIRONO, Ms. BALDWIN, Mr. 

BROWN, Mr. CARPER, Mr. VAN HOLLEN, Mr. CARDIN, Mr. COONS, Mr. 

BOOKER, Ms. HARRIS, Mr. MENENDEZ, and Mrs. FEINSTEIN) introduced 

the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee 

on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To authorize the appropriation of funds to the Centers for 

Disease Control and Prevention for conducting or supporting research on firearms safety or gun violence prevention. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 834 IS

1 SECTION 1. FUNDING FOR RESEARCH BY CDC ON FIRE2 ARMS SAFETY OR GUN VIOLENCE PREVEN3 TION. 

4 There is authorized to be appropriated to the Centers 

5 for Disease Control and Prevention $10,000,000 for each 

6 of fiscal years 2018 through 2023 for the purpose of con7 ducting or supporting research on firearms safety or gun 

8 violence prevention under the Public Health Service Act 

9 (42 U.S.C. 201 et seq.). The amount authorized to be ap10 propriated by the preceding sentence is in addition to any 

11 other amounts authorized to be appropriated for such pur12 pose. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### 1509.203-1519.204 [Reserved]
Exhibit 32.1

 

Certification of the President and Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

I, Bowen S. Diehl, President and Chief Executive Officer of Capital Southwest Corporation, certify that, to my knowledge:

|  | 1. |  | The Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2017, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 7, 2017 (“accompanied report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--|----|--|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | 2. |  | The information contained in the accompanied report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of Capital Southwest Corporation. |
|--|----|--|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

|                               |   |                                  |
|------------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------|
| Date:  November 7,  2017 | By:    | /s/ Bowen S. Diehl                    |
|                               |   | Bowen S. Diehl                        |
|                               |   | President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
Record of Contacts

Docket No. FAA-2012-0935 Directorate Identifier: 2011-NM-256-AD

With whom outside the FAA has this AD action been discussed (i.e., Design Approval 

Holder, manufacturer, ATA, NBAA, RAA, AOPA, ALPA, GAMA, etc)? 

ORGANIZATION PERSON 

CONTACTED

DATE RESPONSE

Boeing Grant Rodland 10/20/2011 Concur.

ATA Joe White 11/03/2011 Other. List below.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other/Additional Information: E-mail sent to ATA describing this AD action.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL
INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE COMPANY'S
AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE
PERIOD ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 1999, AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>  1,000

<S>                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                   SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                $162
<SECURITIES>                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                       15,325
<ALLOWANCES>                             0
<INVENTORY>                         15,078
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                    31,824
<PP&E>                              95,823
<DEPRECIATION>                      41,041
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      84,466
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               14,670
<BONDS>                                  0
<COMMON>                             1,072
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                    0
<PREFERRED>                              0
<OTHER-SE>                          49,722
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>        84,466
<SALES>                             27,068
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                    27,068
<CGS>                               23,746
<TOTAL-COSTS>                       25,436
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      34
<INCOME-PRETAX>                      1,598
<INCOME-TAX>                           544
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                  1,054
<DISCONTINUED>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                          0
<CHANGES>                                0
<NET-INCOME>                         1,054
<EPS-BASIC>                         0.98
<EPS-DILUTED>                         0.98



</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6,1

Eastern Division

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:12−cr−00175

Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Tuesday, October 20, 2015:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman: as to Derrick

Smith (1); This Court denies Smith's motion for release pending appeal [243] and directs

that he report to the U.S. Bureau of Prisons by October 23, 2015. Enter Order. Mailed

notice (rth, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:12-cr-00175 Document #: 256 Filed: 10/20/15 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:2562
#### In the Matter of Paul E. Skavina, an Attorney, Respondent.

[832 NYS2d 833]

Order of suspension entered pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4) (f) and (g). Present—Gorski, J.P, Lunn, Fahey, Green and Pine, JJ. (Filed Apr. 4, 2007.)
Served: March 12, 2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

WASHINGTON, D.C.

Issued by the Department of Transportation

on the 12th day of March, 2013

Essential Air Service at

TATITLEK, ALASKA

Under 49 U.S.C. 41731 et seq. 

DOCKET DOT-OST-2013-0030

NOTICE OF EXTENSION FOR PROPOSALS AT TATITLEK, ALASKA

By Order 2013-12-22, February 22, 2013, the Department requested proposals for Essential Air 

Service (EAS) at Tatitlek, Alaska, with proposals due March 21, 2013. On March 11, J & M 

Alaska Air Tours, Inc., d/b/a Alaska Air Transit requested a two-week extension to that deadline. 

We will grant the extension request. Proposals at Tatitlek are now due on April 4, 2013.

Dennis DeVany, Chief,

EAS and Domestic Analysis

An electronic version of this document is available on the World Wide Web at

http://www.regulations.gov
**U.S. Department of Education**

**Negotiated Rulemaking**

**1990 K Street, NW, 8th Floor Conference Center**

**Washington, D.C.**

**Team I – Teacher Preparation Issues**

**February 27, 2012, 9:00 am – 5:00 pm**

**February 28, 9:00 am – 5:00 pm**

**February 29, 2012, 9:00 am – 12:00 pm**

**Agenda**

**Facilitator’s Welcome**

**Agenda Overview**

**Meeting Summary from Prior Session**

**Housekeeping and Other Issues**

**Review of Issues and Proposed Regulatory Language**

1.  Issue 7:  Service and repayment obligations for the TEACH Grant Program: Teaching service performed for an Educational Service Agency

2.  Issue 8:  Teaching in a high-need field to fulfill the TEACH Grant Agreement to Serve

3.  Issue 9:  Eligibility for a new TEACH Grant after receiving a discharge of the TEACH Grant agreement to serve based on total and permanent disability

4.  Issue 10:  Discharge of the TEACH Grant agreement to serve based on the total and permanent disability of a TEACH Grant recipient

5.  Issue 1:  Recommendations regarding current institution of higher education, teacher preparation program, and State reporting requirements on teacher education program quality

6.  Issue 2:  Recommendations for supplemental State reporting on teacher education program quality that would either replace or augment current reporting requirements

7.  Issue 3:  Criteria used by States to assess the performance of teacher preparation programs

8.  Issue 4:  Standards for State identification of low-performing or at-risk teacher preparation  programs

9.  Issue 5:  Termination of eligibility of teacher preparation programs to enroll students receiving Title IV student assistance in cases where the State has withdrawn its approval or terminated its financial support based on the program’s poor performance

10.  Issue 6:  Definition of “high quality teacher preparation program”

**Next Steps**

· Revised regulatory text

· Agenda for Session 3, April 3 -5, 2012

· Other

� Twenty-minute morning and afternoon breaks on each day will begin at approximately 10:30 a.m. and 3:15 p.m.  The lunch recess on each day will begin at approximately 12 noon.   Time will be made available for public comment during the meeting.

2
Memorandum To: Docket ID Number EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0505 for Oil and Natural Gas 

Sector: Emission Standards for New and Modified Sources

Re: EPA Oil and Gas Production Site Visits

Message: EPA staff attended two site visits on September 24, 2015, to oil and natural gas 

production sites. The purpose of the visit was educational. 

1. Chesapeake Energy & Williams

Dallas, TX 

EPA Participants: 

Bruce Moore, Lisa Thompson, Mark DeFigueiredo

Chesapeake Energy Corporation Representatives: 

Bran Woodard, Brian Boerner, Levi Poe, Greg Johnston, Jim Cooper, Allen Doyel, Jason 

Conway, Clovis Smith, Andrew Whiteneck

Williams Representatives:

Jaron Hill, Beau Galloway, Jacob Mills, Chris McClanahan

2. Conoco Phillips- Niobrara Field Office

Denver, CO

EPA Participants: 

Cindy Beeler, Chris Dresser, Claudia Smith, Alexis McKittrick, Cheryl Vetter, Jodi 

Howard, Amy Hambrick

Conoco Phillips Representatives: 

Ken Powers, Steve Bradford, Derly Gonzales, Milind Bhatte, Maria Torres, Beth Aldrich

Keith Bailey, Wayne McCreesh, Brian Aldrich, Greg York
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Current Report on Form 10-Q of Claires Stores, Inc. (the Company)
for the quarterly period ended April 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the Report), I, Bonnie Schaefer, Co-Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ E. Bonnie SchaeferE. Bonnie SchaeferCo-Chief Executive Officer June 8, 2005