alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### 203.570-3 Contract clause.

Use the clause at 252.203-7001, Prohibition on Persons Convicted of Fraud or Other Defense-Contract-Related Felonies, in all solicitations and contracts exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, except solicitations and contracts for commercial products or commercial services.

[64 FR 14398, Mar. 25, 1999. Redesignated at 69 FR 74990, Dec. 15, 2004; 88 FR 6580, Jan. 31, 2023]
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 84 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 84

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To provide for an exception to a limitation against appointment of 
   persons as Secretary of Defense within seven years of relief from 
   active duty as a regular commissioned officer of the Armed Forces.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXCEPTION TO LIMITATION AGAINST APPOINTMENT OF PERSONS AS 
              SECRETARY OF DEFENSE WITHIN SEVEN YEARS OF RELIEF FROM 
              ACTIVE DUTY AS REGULAR COMMISSIONED OFFICERS OF THE ARMED 
              FORCES.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding the second sentence of section 
113(a) of title 10, United States Code, the first person appointed, by 
and with the advice and consent of the Senate, as Secretary of Defense 
after the date of the enactment of this Act may be a person who is, on 
the date of appointment, within seven years after relief, but not 
within three years after relief, from active duty as a commissioned 
officer of a regular component of the Armed Forces.
    (b) Limited Exception.--This section applies only to the first 
person appointed as Secretary of Defense as described in subsection (a) 
after the date of the enactment of this Act, and to no other person.

            Passed the Senate January 12, 2017.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
115th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                 S. 84

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To provide for an exception to a limitation against appointment of 
   persons as Secretary of Defense within seven years of relief from 
   active duty as a regular commissioned officer of the Armed Forces.
```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

RANDALL W. SYLER, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) Case No. 12 C 1408

)

COUNTY OF WILL, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

MEMORANDUM ORDER

Randall Syler ("Syler"), who had earlier been represented by appointed counsel but is

now proceeding pro se, filed a Motion for Extension of Time ("Motion") on February 21, 2013,

in which he sought additional time to file his notice of appeal from a memorandum opinion and

order ("Opinion") issued by this Court on January 24. Because nonlawyer Syler was obviously

unaware of this District Court's LR 5.2(f) calling for delivery of courtesy copies of all filed

documents to the assigned judge's chambers, this Court was unaware of his Motion until it

recently obtained (as it does at periodic intervals) a printout reflecting pending motions in all

cases assigned to its calendar. This Court hastens to respond to the Motion.

There is no question that the Motion was timely under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) in relation

to the January 24 Opinion. Hence, as permitted by Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5)(C), the Motion 1

 That Opinion rejected Syler's motion for reconsideration of this Court's January 8, 2013 1

memorandum opinion and order that had dismissed this action because of Syler's noncompliance

with the 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a) exhaustion-of-administrative-remedies requirement as a

precondition to any prisoner's Section 1983 action. Because Syler did not appeal from that

dismissal, it would appear that his current appeal relates solely to the January 24 Opinion.

Case: 1:12-cv-01408 Document #: 50 Filed: 03/15/13 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:228
is granted to file his notice of appeal on or before March 29, 2013.

__________________________________________

Milton I. Shadur

Senior United States District Judge

Date: March 15, 2013

- 2 -

Case: 1:12-cv-01408 Document #: 50 Filed: 03/15/13 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:229
(May 4, 1962)

#### In the Matter of the Claim of Mary Tanksley, Appellant. Martin P. Catherwood, as Industrial Commissioner, Respondent.

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board has found on the record that the claimant left her employment without good cause. For this reason the board sustained the initial determination of the Industrial Commissioner ruling claimant ineligible for *841benefits. The decision is fully supported by the proof in the record. Claimant’s own testimony clearly shows her personal differences of opinion with fellow employees led to her leaving her job. Decision unanimously affirmed, without costs. Present — Bergan, P. J., Coon, Gibson, Herlihy and Reynolds, JJ.
#### Georgia Smith, Respondent, v. Ralph L. Smith, Appellant.

— Defendant appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court as grants $15 per week temporary alimony to plaintiff in a separation action. The defendant asserts that the complaint and moving papers do not show merit and a reasonable probability of success. We agree with appellant that mere quarrels and bickering are not a ground for separation, but the papers allege much more than that, and if the allegations are established provide adequate ground upon which the court could grant a separation. The court cannot try the merits upon affidavits, and, in its discretion allowed a modest sum for temporary alimony. If there be no merit to plaintiff’s ease defendant should press for a prompt trial and thereby obtain relief. Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. Present — Bergan, P. J., Coon, Gibson, Herlihy and Reynolds, JJ.
### 3/23/2011 Page 1 of 1

POST FOCUS REPORT Summary Page

Chemical ID: P-11-0173 Re viewe r: Sherer/BC

Endpoints- Assessed Table

Endpoints /Assessment Cycles 1 Releases

Assessed in

NCEM2? Reasons for not assessing releases

No X B

Test ing Required No

Hazard

Concern No

Release s Release

Below

Acute

Threshold 5 Release

Below

Chronic

Threshold 5 Other

Ingestion

Surface water

Ground water ( landfill )

Consumer Use: DtD 2

Inhalation

Air : incineration ( stack )

Air : fugitive

Consumer Use: CEM 3

Dermal

Consumer Use: CEM

Eco

Surface water : ADR

conc and/or PDM 4

Consumer Use: DtD

1 Assessment cycles are endpoint concentrations and dose calculations within the NCEM2 model.

2 Down

- the

- Drain

3 Consumer Exposure Model

4 Probabilistic Dilution Model

5 The threshold values for assessing endpoints are 1 mg/day for acute doses and 1 mg/year for chronic doses.

EAB DROP: Release information for this compound does not meet criteria for preparation of an exposure assessment in the Exposure Assessment Branch = s (EAB) Post Focus Report (this report).
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 971 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 971

To require the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency to 
include in each regulatory impact analysis for a proposed or final rule 
 an analysis that does not include any other proposed or unimplemented 
                                 rule.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 27, 2017

   Mr. Thune introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency to 
include in each regulatory impact analysis for a proposed or final rule 
 an analysis that does not include any other proposed or unimplemented 
                                 rule.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Real EPA Impact Reviews Act'' or the 
``REPAIR Act''.

SEC. 2. REGULATORY IMPACT ANALYSIS REQUIREMENT.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law (including regulations), 
including Executive Order 13563 (76 Fed. Reg. 3821 (January 21, 2011)), 
Executive Order 12866 (58 Fed. Reg. 51735 (October 4, 1993)), and the 
document of the Office of Management and Budget entitled ``OMB Circular 
A-4'', in promulgating any rule the cost of which is projected to be 
greater than $1,000,000, the Administrator of the Environmental 
Protection Agency shall include in each of the regulatory impact 
analyses for the proposed and final rule at least 1 analysis that does 
not include--
            (1) any other proposed rule; or
            (2) any other rule that, as of the date of the analysis--
                    (A) has been finalized by the Administrator; but
                    (B) has not been implemented.
                                 <all>
```
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS

Appeal of - )

)

VetBiz Corp, LLC ) ASBCA No. 61978

)

Under Contract No. W91151-16-D-0003 )

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: Sarah C. Reida, Esq.

 Legal Meets Practical, LLC

 Naperville, IL

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Scott N. Flesch, Esq.

 Army Chief Trial Attorney

Dana J. Chase, Esq.

MAJ Ronald M. Herrmann, JA

 Trial Attorneys

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice.

Dated: September 10, 2020

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 61978, Appeal of VetBiz Corp, LLC, 

rendered in conformance with the Board’s Charter.

Dated: September 10, 2020

JOHN J. THRASHER

Administrative Judge

Chairman

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals

PAULLA K. GATES-LEWIS

Recorder, Armed Services

Board of Contract Appeals
EXHIBIT 12.1





THE BURLINGTON NORTHERN AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES


COMPUTATION
OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES


(In Millions, Except Ratio Amounts)


(Unaudited)





Nine Months Ended September 30,2002

2001Earnings:Income before income taxes

$
1,125

$
1,185Add:Interest and fixed charges excluding capitalized interest


116


130Portion of rent under long-term operating leases representative of an interest factor


137


129Distributed income of investees accounted for under the equity method


3


4Amortization of capitalized interest


6


6Less: Undistributed equity in earnings of investments accounted for under the equity method


11


17Total earnings available for fixed charges

$
1,376

$
1,437Fixed charges:Interest and fixed charges

$
126

$
138Portion of rent under long-term operating leases representative of an interest factor


137


129Total fixed charges

$
263

$
267Ratio of earnings to fixed charges


5.23x


5.38x




E-2
#### Joseph Barbato, Respondent, v. Ida Tuosto, as Administratrix, Appellant, and Gabriele Canzano, Respondent.

Appeal from judgment entered September 11, 1961 dismissed for failure to comply with previous order.
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk September 28, 2009

d0921 

# Order

September 28, 2009

138894

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 138894 COA: 291270 Berrien CC: 2008-406544-FH VICTOR WARDELL WHITE, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 5, 2009 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

K ELLY , C.J., would grant leave to appeal for the reasons set forth in her opinion in People v Idziak , 484 Mich 549 (2009).

C AVANAGH , J., would grant leave to appeal to reconsider People v Idziak , 484 Mich 549 (2009).
EXHIBIT
32.1





Certification
of Principal Executive Officer


Pursuant
to U.S.C. Section 1350


As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




Pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned
officer of NeuMedia, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), does hereby
certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:





The
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ending March 31, 2010 of the Company
(the “Form 10-K”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Form
10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.




Dated: July
14, 2010


/s/ Ray SchaafRay
      SchaafPresident
EXHIBIT 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO SECTION 13a-14(b) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
                           AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Annual Report of Sparta Commercial Services, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2005, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date therein specified (the
"Report"), the undersigned, Anthony L. Havens, as Chief Executive Officer and
Principal Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.


/s/ Anthony L. Havens
---------------------------------
Anthony L. Havens
Chief Executive Officer
and Principal Financial Officer

Date:  January 6, 2006
#### Shameeka Williams, Appellant, v Amb Hassan et al., Respondents.

[835 NYS2d 214]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Dabiri, J.), dated February 27, 2006, as granted the defendants’ cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d).

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, and the defendants’ cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) is denied.

The Supreme Court erred in granting the defendants’ cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. The defendants failed to make a prima facie showing that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) *(see Toure v Avis Rent A Car Sys.,*98 NY2d 345 [2002]; *Gaddy v Eyler,*79 NY2d 955 [1992]). The defendants’ moving papers did not address the allegations made by the plaintiff, as contained in the plaintiffs bill of particulars which was submitted in support of the cross motion, that as a result of the accident she sustained an injury which prevented her from performing substantially all of the material acts which constituted her usual and customary daily activity for a period of not less than 90 days during the 180 days immediately following the accident *(see*Insurance Law § 5102 [d]; *Nakanishi v Sadaqat,*35 AD3d 416 [2006]; *Sayers v Hot,*23 AD3d 453, 454 [2005]; *Nembhard v Delatorre,*16 AD3d 390, 391 [2005]; *Kawasaki v Hertz Corp.,*199 AD2d 46 [1993]). Since the defendants failed to establish their prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, it is unnecessary to reach the question of whether the plaintiffs opposition papers were sufficient to raise a triable issue of fact *(see Coscia v 938 Trading Corp.,*283 AD2d 538 [2001]). Rivera, J.P., Spolzino, Fisher, Lifson and Dickerson, JJ., concur.
#### WHITEHALL LUMBER CO., Limited, Appellant, v. NICHOLS, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

November 11, 1903.)

Action by the Whitehall Lumber Company, Limited, against James E. Nichols, as trustee, etc.

No opinion. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs.
---

EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATIONS OF
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Arthur D. Levinson, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Genentech, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report of Genentech, Inc. on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Genentech, Inc.





| | By:                | /s/ Arthur D. Levinson, Ph.D.                                                     | 
| | ------------------ | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
| |                    |                                                                                   | 
| | Name:
Title:
Date: | Arthur D. Levinson, Ph.D.
President and Chief Executive Officer
February 25, 2005 | 

I, Louis J. Lavigne, Jr., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Genentech, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report of Genentech, Inc. on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Genentech, Inc.





| | By:                | /s/ Louis J. Lavigne, Jr.                                                                        | 
| | ------------------ | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | 
| |                    |                                                                                                  | 
| | Name:
Title:
Date: | Louis J. Lavigne, Jr.
Executive Vice President and 
   Chief Financial Officer
February 25, 2005 | 



---
<PAGE>
<PAGE>
                                                           EXHIBIT 10(h)
 GOLDEN AMERICAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
                            SURPLUS NOTE

Golden American Life Insurance Company agrees to pay Equitable Life
Insurance Company of Iowa corporation, the sum of $60 million
($60,000,000.00) plus interest at the rate of 7.25%  per annum from the
date hereof, December 30, 1998 until paid.  In any event, this note
will mature on December 29, 2028.

This Surplus Note and accrued interest thereon shall be subordinate to
payments due to policyholders, claimant and beneficiary claims, as well
as debts owed to all other classes of debtors, other than surplus note
holders, of Golden American Life Insurance Company in the event of (a)
the institution of bankruptcy, reorganization, insolvency or
liquidation proceedings by or against Golden American Life Insurance
Company, or (b) the appointment of a Trustee, receiver or other
Conservator for a substantial part of Golden American Life Insurance
Company properties.

Any payments made shall first apply to accrued interest, and the
balance of such payment shall apply to reduce the principal of this
Note.

Any payment of principal and/or interest made shall be subject to the
prior approval of the Delaware Insurance Commissioner.  If the
Commissioner has not approved payment of principal to retire the note
prior to its maturity date, the maturity date will be automatically
extended until such time as the Commissioner authorizes payment of the
final balance of principal.

Golden American Life Insurance Company hereby waives presentment and
notice of dishonor.

In witness whereof, Golden American Life Insurance Company has caused
this Note to be executed and delivered.


                                GOLDEN AMERICAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

                                By: /s/ Stephen J. Preston
                                   --------------------------------
                                     Stephen J. Preston, Executive
                                         Vice President


Attest by:


/s/ David L. Jacobson
-------------------------
David L. Jacobson
Senior Vice President and
    Assistant Secretary

<PAGE>
<PAGE>
Case: 1:12-cv-00966 Document #: 3 Filed: 02/10/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:32
-'failing: The ; 1( <' '''5 Journal 1'0 Box' 15505 Wilmington. DE 191150 Street

The 1\ ews Journal 950 W. Basin Road :'iew Castle. DE 19720 (302) 324-2500 

# The News Journal Sunday News Journal The**:"ie\f ~**  Journal



# AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION STATE OF DELAWARE COUNTY OF NR\¥ CASTLE Personally appeared before me this 21 SI day ofDecember, 2008: 

### I, Kristin Segner, of the NRWS JOURNAL COMPANY, 

### a daily newspaper printed and pubrished in the Counry of New Castle County, State of Delaware, who, heing duly swam states that the ad vertisemenf o f 

### SID**DNRE~** Air Quality Management

- Public Hearing on Proposal to Amendment Reg. #1141
_ was published in THE NEWS JOURNAL on and/or THE SUNDAY NEWS JOURNAL on 

# fxL"**~** N/A DeGember 21, 2008 Legal Coordinator 

# JrlJ:JtMu.l.

# JJjlWJ Name ' . Title Sworn to before me this 21 st day of Decemher, 2008 Notary Public
U.S. Department of Transportation Office of the Secretary ofTransportation
TheHonorable LaurieR. Gill Mayorofthe City ofPierre 222 E. Dakota Ave. P.O. Box 1253 Pierre, SD 57501 Dear Mayor Gill: 

### MAR 

## 24 2015 1200 NewJerseyAvenue SE Washington DC 20590

0 N /

. '

Thank you for your letter requesting an additional time extension regarding Pierre's Essential Air Service (EAS) recommendation due to the recent developments ofAerodynamics Incorporated (ADI), which you had previously recommended for selection to provide EAS to Pierre. You state the City ofPierre supports the US DOT's (the Department's) Air Carrier Fitness Division's review process and the City will await the Department's final determination before making a rec01i1mendation. Further, the City requests two weeks after ADI's fitness determination has been finalized to make theirrecommendation. The Department hereby grants the City ofPierre's request. Acopy ofthis letter will be placed in Pierre's docket (DOT-OST-2011-0138) on \VW\v.re!!tllations.!!ov.
Sincerely,

# .~-\-A**3).~;J** Brandon i'vl. Belford Deputy Assistant Secretary for Aviation and International Affairs