alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
219.703 Eligibility requirements for participating in the program. ( a ) Qualified nonprofit agencies for the blind and other severely disabled, that have been approved by the Committee for Purchase from People Who Are Blind or Severely Disabled under 41 U.S.C. chapter 85, are eligible to participate in the program as a result of 10 U.S.C. 3903 and section 9077 of Public Law 102-396 and similar sections in subsequent Defense appropriations acts. Under this authority, subcontracts awarded to such entities may be counted toward the prime contractor's small business subcontracting goal.
( b ) A contractor may also rely on the written representation as to status of— ( i ) A historically black college or university or minority institution; or
( ii ) A qualified nonprofit agency for the blind or other severely disabled approved by the Committee for Purchase from People Who Are Blind or Severely Disabled.
[57 FR 42630, Sept. 15, 1992, as amended at 58 FR 28465, May 13, 1993; 60 FR 13075, Mar. 10, 1995; 60 FR 41157, Aug. 11, 1995; 60 FR 61596, Nov. 30, 1995; 61 FR 50535, Sept. 26, 1996; 63 FR 11530, Mar. 9, 1998; 63 FR 41974, Aug. 6, 1998; 64 FR 51076, Sept. 21, 1999; 64 FR 62986, Nov. 18, 1999; 72 FR 20762, Apr. 26, 2007; 76 FR 58137, Sept. 20, 2011; 77 FR 35880, June 15, 2012; 79 FR 61582, Oct. 14, 2014; 87 FR 76993, Dec. 16, 2022]
#### 1403.104 Procurement integrity.
#### Grace L. Dubendorf et al., Doing Business as Gra-Mar Hall et al., Respondents, v New York State Education Department, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

— Appeal dismissed, without costs, upon stipulation. (Appeal from order of Monroe Supreme Court — contempt.) Present — Cardamone, J. P., Schnepp, Callahan, Doerr and Moule, JJ. [97 Misc 2d 382.]
#### 208.405-6 Limiting sources.

For an order or blanket purchase agreement (BPA) exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold that is a follow-on to an order or BPA for the same supply or service previously issued based on a limiting sources justification citing the authority at FAR 8.405-6(a)(1)(i)(B) or (C), follow the procedures at PGI 208.405-6.

[80 FR 21657, Apr. 20, 2015]
#### 1401.7000 Scope of subpart.

This subpart sets forth requirements for review and approval of contract actions and the conduct of acquisition management reviews.
#### 1432.903 Responsibilities.

The CO may modify the timing of payment specified in paragraph (a)(1)(i) and (ii) of the clause FAR 52.232-26, Prompt Payment for Fixed-Price Architect-Engineer Contracts, and/or paragraph (a)(1)(i) and (ii) of the clause at FAR 52.232-27, Prompt Payment for Construction Contracts, as appropriate, to provide for a period shorter than 30 days (but not less than 7 days) for making contract financing payments based on geographical site location, workload, contractor ability to submit a proper request for payment, or other factors. When considering a modification to these FAR standard(s), the CO should alert the finance and program officials involved in the payment process to ensure that such shorter contract payment terms to be specified in the solicitation and resulting contract will be met. A CO determination justifying a shorter payment period must be documented in writing, and incorporated into the solicitation/contract file.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Lubys, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the
fiscal quarter ended May 7, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, K. Scott Gray, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.



|                    |  |     |  |                                                  
|------------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------
|Date: June 13, 2008 |  | By: |  | /s/ K. Scott Gray                                
|                    |  |     |  | K. Scott Gray                                    
|                    |  |     |  | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
March 24, 1975.

M. P. No. 75-50.

#### Eastern Scrap Services, Inc. *v.*William Harty *et al.*

*Michael F. Horan,*for petitioner. *Gerald J. Pouliot,*Asst. City Solicitor, *William J. George,*Special Co-counsel, for respondents.

Petition for writ of certiorari is granted, and the writ may issue forthwith. The parties are directed to brief the issue, among other pertinent issues, as to whether or not G. L. 1956 (1970 Reenactment) §45-5-16 renders the issuance of the writ improvident in this case. Matter is assigned specially to the May 1975 calendar.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          56,000
<SECURITIES>                                   200,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                  582,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     50,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               958,000
<PP&E>                                       4,047,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,427,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,141,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          563,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        13,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,268,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,141,000
<SALES>                                      2,170,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,179,000
<CGS>                                        1,677,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,018,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              46,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                131,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            131,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   131,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .10


</TABLE>
Case: 1:12-cv-02507 Document #: 24 Filed: 04/30/12 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:98
Case: 1:12-cv-02507 Document #: 24 Filed: 04/30/12 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:99
#### 2124.102-70 Policy.

Records retained by FEGLI Program contractors on Federal insureds and members of their families serve the contractors' own commercial function of paying FEGLI Program claims and are not maintained to accomplish an agency function of OPM. Consequently, the records do not fall within the provisions of the Privacy Act. Nevertheless, OPM recognizes the need for the contractors to keep certain records confidential. The clause at 2152.224-70 addresses this concern.
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

In the interest of K.D.R., Jr. and * From the 318th District

C.A.M.R., children, Court of Midland County,

Trial Court No. FM 48,337.

No. 11-13-00023-CV * July 18, 2013

 * Memorandum Opinion by Willson, J.

(Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

McCall, J., and Willson, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is no 

error in the order below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, the 

order of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
§ 750.22 Exclusiveness of remedy. ( a ) The Federal Employees Liability Reform and Tort Compensation Act of 1988, Public Law 100-694 (amending 28 U.S.C. 2679(b) and 2679(d)), provides that the exclusive remedy for damage or loss of property, or personal injury or death arising from the negligent or wrongful acts or omissions of all Federal employees, acting within the scope of their employment, will be against the United States. This immunity from personal liability does not extend to allegations of constitutional torts, nor to allegations of violations of statutes specifically authorizing suits against individuals.
( b ) Other statutory provisions create immunity from personal liability for specific categories of Federal employees whose conduct, within the scope of their employment, gives rise to claims against the Government. Department of Defense health care providers are specifically protected by 10 U.S.C. 1089, the Gonzalez Act. DOD attorneys are specifically protected by 10 U.S.C. 1054.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 2 0 - 0083 STATE OF MONTANA, et al.,

Plaintiffs/Appellees/Cross -Appellants, v. GREENFIELDS IRRIGATION DISTRICT, et al.,

Defendants/Appellants/Cross -Appellees.

**GRANT OF EXTENSION** Upon consideration of Plaintiffs/Appellees/Cross -Appellants State of Montana’s , et al. , (“State”) unopposed motion for a 14 - day extension of time of the stay of this appeal , and good cause appearing, the State and the other parties are granted an extension of time to and including October 15 , 20 21 , within which to prepare, serve, and file their joint motion to dismiss pursuant to Mont. R. App. P 16(5) and accompanying stipulation .

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

October 1 2021

10/01/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0083
EXHIBIT 32.2





Certification of Principal Financial Officer





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)





In connection with the Annual Report of Enservco Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the annual period ended December, 31 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.









Dated: March 25, 2011
By
/s/  Rick D. KaschRick D. Kasch, Chief Financial Officer
#### 1436.270-1 Uniform contract format.

(a) COs shall prepare solicitations and contracts for construction using the uniform contract format outlined in Table 1436-1.

(b) If any section of the uniform contract format does not apply, the CO should so mark that section in the solicitation. Upon award, the CO shall not physically include Part IV in the resulting contract, but shall retain it in the contract file.

Table 1436-1—Uniform Contract Format

| Section | Title |
| --- | --- |
| **Part I—The Schedule** | |
| A | Solicitation/contract form. |
| B | Bid schedule. |
| C | Specifications/Drawings. |
| D | Packaging and marking. |
| E | Inspection and acceptance. |
| F | Deliveries or performance. |
| G | Contract administration data. |
| H | Special contract requirements. |
| **Part II—Contract Clauses** | |
| I | Contract clauses. |
| **Part III—List of Documents, Exhibits, and Other Attachments** | |
| J | List of attachments. |
| **Part IV—Representations and Instructions** | |
| K | Representations, certifications, and other statements of offerors. |
| L | Instructions, conditions, and notices to offerors. |
| M | Evaluation factors for award. |

[[75 FR 19829](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/75-FR-19829), Apr. 15, 2010, as amended at [76 FR 50142](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/76-FR-50142), Aug. 12, 2011]
----

----

|   | (1) | the      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| By:    | s/s George R.      Quist                                       |
|   | George      R. Quist                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         |
|   | Chairman      of the Board and                                                                                                                                                                                                                               |
|   | Chief      Executive Officer                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 |
|   | March      31, 2010                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          |

----
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential.



# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

IN RE: EIDOS COMMUN ICATIONS, LLC, Appellant

______________________

2014

- 1658

______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 95/001,898.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

R OBERT C. N ISSEN , McKenna Long & Aldridge, LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellant. Also represented by S ONG J UNG

, C ARL P AUL B RETSCHER

.

J OSEPH M ATAL , Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for intervenor Michelle K. Lee. Also represen ted by N ATHAN K. K ELLEY

, S COTT W EIDENFELLER

, S YDNEY O. J OHNSON

, J R

.

______________________

T HIS C AUSE having been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED :P ER C URIAM (L OURIE

, P LAGER

, and T ARANTO

, Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED

. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

April 14, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole

Date Daniel E. O’Toole
Clerk of Court
Exhibit 32(b)








CERTIFICATION
FURNISHED PURSUANT TO




18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,




AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q of Progress Energy, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ending June
30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the “Report”), I, Peter M. Scott III, Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:




(1)           the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)           the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.











/s/ Peter M. Scott
III


Peter M.
Scott III


Executive
Vice President and


Chief
Financial Officer


August 8,
2008








This
certification is being furnished and shall not be deemed filed by the Company
for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
or incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, or the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

September 28, 2009 

d0921 

Order 

 

September 28, 2009 

138894 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 138894 

 COA: 291270 

Berrien CC: 2008-406544-FH 

VICTOR WARDELL WHITE, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 5, 2009 order of 

the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that 

the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

 KELLY, C.J., would grant leave to appeal for the reasons set forth in her opinion in 

People v Idziak, 484 Mich 549 (2009). 

 CAVANAGH, J., would grant leave to appeal to reconsider People v Idziak, 484 

Mich 549 (2009).
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB (the "Report") of Colorado Wyoming Reserve Company (the "Company") for the year ended June 30, 2004, Rafiq A. Sayed, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of the undersigned's knowledge and belief:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date:  June 29, 2005

/s/ Rafiq A. Sayed



Rafiq A. Sayed



Chief Financial Officer
- '01242067 Complaint' of '24-00464-F Complaints'
- '01242067 Recipient Notification Letter' of '24-00447-F Boston'
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

 

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

**(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**

 

 

In connection with the Annual Report ofBancTec, Inc, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-K for theyear ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission (the “Report”), I, J. Coley Clark, President and Chief ExecutiveOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to my knowledge:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/     J.  Coley Clark |   |
|--------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                             |
| J. Coley Clark                                   |
| President and Chief Executive  Officer           |
|                                             |
| April 7, 2005                                    |

 

A signed original of this written statementrequired by 18 USC Section 1350 has been provided to the Company and willbe retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 

----
Exhibit 12.1



BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY and SUBSIDIARIES

COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

(In Millions, Except Ratio Amounts)

(Unaudited)



|                                                                                            |  |      |       |      |   |      
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---- | ----- | ---- | - | -----
|Three Months Ended March 31,                                                                |  | 2005 |       | 2004
|Earnings:                                                                                   |  |      |       |      |   |      
|Income before income taxes                                                                  |  | $    | 611   |      | $ | 392  
|Add:                                                                                        |  |      |       |      |   |      
|Interest and fixed charges excluding capitalized interest                                   |  |      | 34    |      |   | 32   
|Portion of rent under long-term operating leases representative of an interest factor       |  |      | 52    |      |   | 48   
|Distributed income of investees accounted for under the equity method                       |  |      | 1     |      |   | 1    
|Amortization of capitalized interest                                                        |  |      | 2     |      |   | 2    
|Less: Undistributed equity in earnings of investments accounted for under the equity method |  |      | 1     |      |   | 3    
|                                                                                            |  |      |       |      |   |      
|Total earnings available for fixed charges                                                  |  | $    | 699   |      | $ | 472  
|                                                                                            |  |      |       |      |   |      
|Fixed charges:                                                                              |  |      |       |      |   |      
|Interest and fixed charges                                                                  |  | $    | 37    |      | $ | 34   
|Portion of rent under long-term operating leases representative of an interest factor       |  |      | 52    |      |   | 48   
|                                                                                            |  |      |       |      |   |      
|Total fixed charges                                                                         |  | $    | 89    |      | $ | 82   
|                                                                                            |  |      |       |      |   |      
|Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                                                          |  |      | 7.85x |      |   | 5.76x
|                                                                                            |  |      |       |      |   |