alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLAR
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          13,829
<SECURITIES>                                   267,067
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               282,045
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 366,795
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    109,356
<COMMON>                                         4,851
<OTHER-SE>                                   (786,395)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   366,796
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                65,470
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (284,835)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (284,835)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (454,616)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.04)
        

</TABLE>
### Proceedings of the 1987 Exclusive Economic Zone symposium on mapping and research; planning for the next 10 years

By: Millington LockwoodBonnie A. McGregor

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/cir1018

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
**EXHIBIT
          32.2**
 
 
 **Section
          1350 Certification**
 **By
          Principal Financial Officer**
 
  I,
          Craig
          R. Jones, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
          to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the periodic report,
          to which this Statement is attached, fully complies with the requirements
          of
          Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, and
          the
          information contained in the periodic report to which this Statement is
          attached, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
          and
          results of operations of the registrant.
 
 A
          signed
          original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and
          will be
          retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC upon request.
 
 
 Date:
          October 8, 2008
 
 
 /s/
                    Craig R. JonesCraig
                    R. Jones
                  Chief
                    Financial Officer
#### § 86.1 Purpose.

This part establishes policy, assigns responsibilities, and provides procedures to conduct criminal history checks on individuals involved in the provision of child care services for children under the age of 18 in DoD programs.
- '05231026 Complaint' of '24-00447-F Chicago'
- '05231026 Recipient Notification Letter' of '24-00447-F Chicago'
#### 1852.235-71 Key personnel and facilities.

As prescribed in 1835.070(b), insert the following clause:

# Key Personnel and Facilities (MAR 1989)

(a) The personnel and/or facilities listed below (or specified in the contract Schedule) are considered essential to the work being performed under this contract. Before removing, replacing, or diverting any of the listed or specified personnel or facilities, the Contractor shall (1) notify the Contracting Officer reasonably in advance and (2) submit justification (including proposed substitutions) in sufficient detail to permit evaluation of the impact on this contract.

(b) The Contractor shall make no diversion without the Contracting Officer's written consent; *provided,* that the Contracting Officer may ratify in writing the proposed change, and that ratification shall constitute the Contracting Officer's consent required by this clause.

(c) The list of personnel and/or facilities (shown below or as specified in the contract Schedule) may, with the consent of the contracting parties, be amended from time to time during the course of the contract to add or delete personnel and/or facilities.

[List here the personnel and/or facilities considered essential, unless they are specified in the contract Schedule.]

(End of clause)
### §§1182a to 1182c. Repealed. Pub. L. 87–301, §24(a)(1), (3), Sept. 26, 1961, 75 Stat. 657

Section 1182a, act Sept. 3, 1954, ch. 1254, §4, 68 Stat. 1145, related to admission of aliens who were either convicted, or who admitted the commission, of a misdemeanor.

Section 1182b, Pub. L. 85–316, §5, Sept. 11, 1957, 71 Stat. 640, permitted admission of an alien spouse, child or parent excludable for crime involving moral turpitude in cases of hardship, when not contrary to national welfare or security, and with Attorney General's consent, and under conditions and procedures prescribed by him. See section 1182(h) of this title.

Section 1182c, Pub. L. 85–316, §6, Sept. 11, 1957, 71 Stat. 640; Pub. L. 86–253, §1, Sept. 9, 1959, 73 Stat. 490, authorized admission of an alien spouse, child, or parent of a United States citizen afflicted with tuberculosis under terms, conditions and controls prescribed by Attorney General. See section 1182(g) of this title.
### Cannot redisplay /tmp/23656624-0--96941.pdf, it has already been shown once.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the company's
consolidated financial statements and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-29-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-29-1997
<CASH>                                          34,119
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   17,975
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    131,409
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               197,829
<PP&E>                                         910,820
<DEPRECIATION>                                 446,643
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,060,839
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          172,640
<BONDS>                                        600,063
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           65,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           100
<OTHER-SE>                                   (153,310)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,060,839
<SALES>                                      2,312,673
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,312,673
<CGS>                                        1,606,926
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,606,926
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               780,755
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             105,823
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (180,831)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (2,523)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (183,354)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (185,354)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (18.54)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### 1652.203-70 Misleading, deceptive, or unfair advertising.

As prescribed in 1603.7003, the following clause shall be inserted in all FEHBP contracts:

# Misleading, Deceptive, or Unfair Advertising (JAN 1991)

(a) The Carrier agrees that any advertising material, including that labeled promotional material, marketing material, or supplemental literature, shall be truthful and not misleading.

(b) Criteria to assess compliance with paragraph (a) of this clause are available in the FEHB Supplemental Literature Guidelines which are developed by OPM and should be used, along with the additional guidelines set forth in FEHBAR 1603.702, as the primary guide in preparing material; further guidance is provided in the NAIC “Rules Governing Advertising of Accident and Sickness Insurance With Interpretive Guidelines.” Guidelines are periodically updated and provided to the Carrier by OPM.

(c) Failure to conform to paragraph (a) of this clause may result in a reduction in the service charge, if appropriate, and corrective action to protect the interest of Federal Members. Corrective action will be appropriate to the circumstances and may include, but is not limited to the following actions by OPM:

(1) Directing the Carrier to cease and desist distribution, publication, or broadcast of the material;

(2) Directing the Carrier to issue corrections at the Carrier's expense and in the same manner and media as the original material was made; and

(3) Directing the Carrier to provide, at the Carrier's expense, the correction in writing by certified mail to all enrollees of the Plan(s) that had been the subject of the original material.

(d) Egregious or repeated offenses may result in the following action by OPM:

(1) Suspending new enrollments in the Carrier's Plan(s);

(2) Providing Enrollees an opportunity to transfer to another plan; and

(3) Terminating the contract in accordance with Section 1.15, Renewal and Withdrawal of Approval.

(e) Prior to taking action as described in paragraphs (c) and (d) of this clause, the OPM will notify the Carrier and offer an opportunity to respond.

(f) The Carrier shall incorporate this clause in subcontracts with its underwriter, if any, and other subcontractors directly involved in the preparation or distribution of such advertising material and shall substitute “Contractor” or other appropriate reference for the term “Carrier.”

(End of clause)

[55 FR 27415, July 2, 1990, as amended at 62 FR 47576, Sept. 10, 1997]
|  |  |  | Information For          StudentsParentsTeachersAdministratorsInformation AboutGrants & ContractsFinancial AidResearch & StatisticsPolicyPrograms |  |  |
|--|--|--|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|

 

 

The ED Offices page has moved to a new address.  You will be forwarded to the new address at http://www.ed.gov/about/offices/list/index.html in 10 seconds.  Please remember to update your bookmarks.
#### Wesley H. Fling et al., Appellants, v McGregor, Swire Air Services, Ltd., et al., Respondents.

— In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered September 13, 1978, which denied their motion to *902increase the *ad damnum*clause. Order reversed, and motion granted, with $50 costs and disbursements. Special Term improvidently exercised its discretion in denying plaintiffs’ motion to increase their *ad damnum*clause. The injuries sustained could conceivably result in a verdict in excess of that demanded in the original complaint (cf. *Calautti v National Transp. Co.,*10 AD2d 955). Suozzi, J. P., O’Connor, Gulotta and Cohalan, JJ., concur.
#### 2009.405 Effect of listing.

Compelling reasons are considered to be present where failure to contract with the debarred or suspended contractor would seriously harm the agency's programs and prevent accomplishment of mission requirements. The Senior Procurement Executive is authorized to make the determinations under FAR 9.405. Requests for these determinations must be submitted from the Head of the Contracting Activity, through the Director, Office of Administration, to the Senior Procurement Executive.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM COMPANY'S
10-K FILED JULY 3, 1996 WITH SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WHICH INCLUDES
THE AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FILED IN ITEM 8 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-K.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1996
<CASH>                                      17,817,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               30,651,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                13,353,000
<INVENTORY>                                    566,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            35,681,000
<PP&E>                                       2,103,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,041,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              37,346,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       10,935,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        2,078,000 
<PREFERRED>                                    154,000      
<COMMON>                                       248,000
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                24,333,000
<SALES>                                      3,541,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,541,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             4,982,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,306,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (11,707,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                              (11,707,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              8,709,000         
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,998,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.29)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.29)
        

</TABLE>
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

448 CA 11-01853 PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., LINDLEY, SCONIERS, AND MARTOCHE, JJ.

SHARLENE MCKENZIE, AS EXECUTRIX OF THE ESTATE OF OSCAR MCKENZIE, JR., DECEASED, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

V ORDER

ONONDAGA COUNTY AND ONONDAGA COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION ASSIGNED COUNSEL PROGRAM, INC., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

JEFFREY R. PARRY, SYRACUSE, FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT.
BOND, SCHOENECK & KING, PLLC, SYRACUSE (JONATHAN B. FELLOWS OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (John C. Cherundolo, A.J.), entered July 5, 2011. The order, among other things, granted the motion of defendants to dismiss the second through seventh causes of action.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs ( see Roulan v County of Onondaga , 90 AD3d 1617; Cagnina v Onondaga County , 90 AD3d 1626; Matter of Parry v County of Onondaga , 51 AD3d 1385).

Entered: April 27, 2012 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
<PAGE>
                                                                  EXHIBIT   21.1

                               SUBSIDIARY LISTING
            AMERICAN BUILDING CONTROL, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION


NAME OF COMPANY*                                  JURISDICTION
*    100% owned by American Building
     Control, Inc., unless otherwise indicated

ABM Data Systems, Inc.                            Texas
American Building Control Ohio, Inc.              Ohio
Monitor Dynamics, Inc.                            California
Security Warranty, Inc.                           Texas
MDI (Asia Pacific) Pty. Ltd.                      Australia
MDI Security Systems (Asia) Pte. Ltd.             Singapore
Ultrak Beneleux N.V.(1)                           Belgium
Ultrak Europe N.V.(1)                             Belgium
American Building Control GP, Inc.                Delaware
American Building Control LP, Inc.                Delaware
MDI Operating, L.P.(3)                            Texas
MDI (SA) Limited                                  South Africa

Monitor Devices Holdings, Ltd.                    United Kingdom
o    Securite Procurement France, S.A.R.L.(2)     France
o    MDI Deutschland GmbH(2)                      Germany
o    Ultrak France, S.A.(2)                       France
o    MDI Italia, S.p.A.(2)                        Italy
o    MDI Polska, S.p.z.O.O.(2)                    Poland
o    MDI Monitor Dynamics International S.A.(2)   Switzerland
o    Monitor Devices (UK), Ltd.(2)                United Kingdom



----------

(1)  99% owned by American Building Control, Inc., 1% owned by Monitor Devices
     Holdings, Ltd.

(2)  100% owned by Monitor Devides Holdings, Ltd.

(3)  American Building Control LP, Inc. is the limited partner, American
     Building Control GP, Inc. is the general partner.
#### 1515.604 Agency points of contact.

The Director, Grants Administration Division (3903R), EPA, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460, is the Agency contact point established to coordinate the receipt and handling of unsolicited proposals.

[64 FR 47410, Aug. 31, 1999, 65 FR 47325, Aug. 2, 2000]
#### 1415.207 Handling proposals and information.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. George Hill, Appellant.

Order entered on October 14, 1960 unanimously affirmed. No opinion. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, Eager and Steuer, JJ.
#### POLSTEIN v. MILLER.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.

December 21, 1905.)

Contracts—Actions—Measure of Recovery.

Where defendant prevented plaintiff from completing under a contract work on a certain building, and only three-fourths thereof was finished, a judgment in an action to recover on the contract, based on the contract price for the work, there being no proof of the reasonable value of the labor performed or omitted, or of prospective profits lost, was unwarranted.

Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Thirteenth District.

*212Action by Louis Polstein against Max Miller.- Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.

Reversed.

Argued before SCOTT, P. J., and BISCHOFP, and MacLEAN, JJ.

Henry Kuntz, for' appellant.

Feltenstein & Rosenstein, for respondent.

BISCHOFF, J.

The plaintiff’s claim for $4,316, which the judgment awards him in full, was made up of an item of $16, the balance due for work upon a building at 124th street, and an item of $300, the agreed price' for a gross amount of work to be done upon another building on Sixtieth street. It appeared that the defendant had prevented complete performance of the work upon the latter building under the contract, and the plaintiff’s testimony left no doubt of the fact that he had not fully performed the work; indeed, he stated that he had finished only three-quarters of it, while leaving materials sufficient upon the premises to finish it. There was no proof of the reasonable value of the work done or omitted, nor of prospective profits lost; and the recovery of $300 is based, apparently, on nothing other than the contract price for the work. This contract, however, which stated only a gross price for completed work, was no measure of the value of the partial work done, and a recovery of the full price was thus, to some indeterminable degree, excessive and unwarranted by the proof. Rosenbloom v. Maas (App. term; November 3, 1905) 95 N. Y. Supp. 95.

There must be a new trial of the cause.

Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event. All concur.
#### 1850.103-6 Disposition.
**U.S. Department of Education**

**Negotiated Rulemaking**

**1990 K Street, N.W., 8th Floor Conference Center**

**Washington, D.C.**

**Team I – General/Lender Loan Issues**

**February 23 & 24, 2009, 9:00 a.m. – 5:00 p.m.**

**February 25, 2009, 9:00 a.m. – 12:00 p.m.**

**Agenda***

**Welcome**

**Introductions**

**Overview of the Negotiated Rulemaking Process**

**Review and Adopt Protocols**

# Petitions for Membership

**Overview of the General/Lender Loan Issues**

**Review Agenda of Issues to be Negotiated**

**Workshop-Style Review of Issues**

1. Determining Borrower Eligibility for In-School Deferment 

2. Borrower Notification When the Transfer, Sale, or Assignment of a Loan Results in a Change in the Party to Whom Payments Must be Sent

3. Lender and Guaranty Agency Prohibited Inducements

4. Lender Forebearance and Borrower Contact Requirements

5. Applicability of the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act to FFEL and Direct Loan Borrowers and related FFEL Lender Special Allowance Payment Calculations

6. Guaranty Agency Notifications to Borrowers in Default; Financial and Economic Literacy for Rehabilitated Borrowers

7. PLUS Loan Deferments and Interest Capitalization

8. Consolidation Loan Borrower Eligibility and Applicant Disclosures

9. Consumer Credit Reporting After Loan Rehabilitation; Eligibility for Loan Rehabilitation

10. FFEL and Direct Loan Teacher Loan Forgiveness

11. Required Education Loan Borrower Disclosures by FFEL Lenders

12. Consumer Education Information Provided by Guaranty Agencies

13. New Audit Requirement for FFEL School Lenders and Eligible Lender Trustees (ELTs) Originating FFEL Loans for an Institution or School-Affiliated Organization

14. Loan Discharges Based on Total and Permanent Disability 

15. Required Education Loan Borrower Disclosures by Lenders

# Logistics

# Schedule of future meetings

# Identify additional information needs

**Next Steps**

****Draft Regulatory Text

Agenda for Meeting 2:   March 30 – April 1, 2009

Meeting Summary

Other

*  Time will be made available for public comment during the meeting.

2/17/2009