alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Team II -- School-Based Loan Issues 

Community of 

Interest 

Primary negotiator Alternate negotiator 

Students Angela Peoples Rich Williams 

2-year Public 

Institutions 

Richard Heath Pat Hurley 

4-year Public 

Institutions 

Roberta Johnson Mr. Kim Jenerette 

Private, 

Nonprofit 

Institutions 

Elizabeth Hicks Nancy Hoover 

Private, ForProfit 

Institutions 

Mary Dorrell Nancy Broff 

Minority 

Serving 

Institutions 

Thelma Ross Helga Greenfield 

Financial Aid 

Administrators 

Justin Draeger Charles “Buddy” Mayfield 

Business 

Officers 

Virginia Layton Anne Gross 

Institutional and 

Loan Servicers 

Mary Lyn Hammer James B. Parker 

Guaranty 

Agencies 

Scot Williams Jacqueline Fairbairn 

Perkins Loan 

Institutions 

Jackie Ito-Woo Beth Stack 

Massachusetts 

Executive 

Office of Higher 

Education 

J. D. LaRock 

Department of 

Education 

Gail McLarnon
215.306 Exchanges with offerors after receipt of proposals. ( c ) *Competitive range.* ( 1 ) For acquisitions with an estimated value of $100 million or more, contracting officers should conduct discussions. Follow the procedures at FAR 15.306(c) and (d).
[76 FR 58152, Sept. 20, 2011]
#### 16.206 Fixed-ceiling-price contracts with retroactive price redetermination.
#### Joseph Fox, Appellant, v. Israel Simon et al., Respondents.

Motion granted and appeal dismissed, with $10 motion costs.
(September 24, 1963)

#### In the Matter of the Person and Property of William Silverman, an Alleged Incompetent Person.

Motion for leave to dispense with printing denied, with leave to renew upon a showing of financial status in accordance with section 1101 of the Civil [Practice Law and Rules. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, Eager and Steuer, JJ.
1503.601 Policy. ( a ) No contract may be awarded without competition to a former employee or special government employee (or to a business concern or other organization owned or substantially owned or controlled by a former employee) whose employment terminated within 365 calendar days before submission of a proposal to EPA.
( b ) No contract shall be awarded without competition to a firm which employs, or proposes to employ, a current employee or special government employee, or a former EPA employee or special government employee, whose employment terminated within 365 calendar days before submission of a proposal to EPA, if either of the following conditions exists: ( 1 ) The current or former EPA employee or special government employee is or was involved in development or negotiating the proposal for the prospective contractor; or
( 2 ) The current or former EPA employee or special government employee will be involved directly or indirectly in the management, administration, or performance of the contract.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 5.0.3

Eastern Division

Pinpoint Incorporated

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:12−cv−01195

Honorable Joan H. Lefkow

Sears Roebuck and Co

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Wednesday, June 20, 2012:

 MINUTE entry before Honorable Joan H. Lefkow: Status hearing of 7/3/2012

stricken and reset for 7/12/2012 at 08:30 AM.Mailed notice(mad, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:12-cv-01195 Document #: 26 Filed: 06/20/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:223
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

CHICAGO TILE INSTITUTE )

WELFARE PLAN, et al., )

)

Plaintiffs, )

)

v. ) No. 12 C 2619

)

C.E. KORSGARD COMPANY, )

)

Defendant. )

MEMORANDUM ORDER

C.E. Korsgard Company (“Korsgard”) has filed its Answer in this ERISA action brought

against it to collect contributions to trust funds established pursuant to a collective bargaining

agreement. This memorandum order is issued sua sponte to require flawed provisions of that

responsive pleading to be corrected.

Answer ¶¶ 6 and 7 both assert that the collective bargaining agreement and the trust

agreement establishing the funds “speak for themselves.” That won’t do – see App’x 3 to State

Farm. Mut. Auto Ins. Co. v. Riley, 199 F.R.D. 276, 279 (N.D. Ill. 2001). 

Accordingly, Answer ¶¶ 6 and 7 are stricken and must be replaced on or before June 8,

2012 with proper answers to the corresponding Complaint allegations. And while Korsgard’s

counsel is at it, he must also eliminate his meaningless demand for “strict proof” (whatever that

may mean).

___________________________________

Milton I. Shadur

Senior United States District Judge

Date: May 29, 2012
Case: 1:12-cv-01887 Document #: 14-7 Filed: 09/04/12 Page 1 of 8 PageID #:312
Case: 1:12-cv-01887 Document #: 14-7 Filed: 09/04/12 Page 2 of 8 PageID #:313
Case: 1:12-cv-01887 Document #: 14-7 Filed: 09/04/12 Page 3 of 8 PageID #:314
Case: 1:12-cv-01887 Document #: 14-7 Filed: 09/04/12 Page 4 of 8 PageID #:315
Case: 1:12-cv-01887 Document #: 14-7 Filed: 09/04/12 Page 5 of 8 PageID #:316
Case: 1:12-cv-01887 Document #: 14-7 Filed: 09/04/12 Page 6 of 8 PageID #:317
Case: 1:12-cv-01887 Document #: 14-7 Filed: 09/04/12 Page 7 of 8 PageID #:318
Free Video Hosting. Secure Dedicated Servers. Mobile Ready. Sign Up or Take a Tour

Videobam - Fast, free video hosting

Upload Video

Register

Sign in

Login

Advertisement: pro users don't see ads

Mixitupboy.com DeAngelo Jackson vs Lil Niz

Upload by donho999

Mixitupboy.com DeAngelo Jackson vs Lil Niz http://videobam.com/kNQxo

1 of 5 10/6/11 1:05 PM

Case: 1:12-cv-01887 Document #: 14-7 Filed: 09/04/12 Page 8 of 8 PageID #:319
#### In the Matter of William J. Fitzgerald, an Attorney, Respondent. Denis M. Hurley, as Petitioner.

Motion to confirm the report of the Special Referee recommending disbarment. Our examination of the entire record discloses that all the charges contained in the petition have been established, except charge “M”. This charge is dismissed; the other charges are sustained. Motion granted, respondent disbarred and his name ordered to be struck from the roll of attorneys. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Ughetta, Christ and Pette, JJ., concur.
#### § 2700.43 Reproduction controls.

OMSN and SLNO shall maintain records to show the number and distribution of all OMSN originated classified documents. Reproduction of classified material shall take place only in accordance with section 4-4 of E.O. 12065 and any limitations imposed by the originator. Should copies be made, they are subject to the same controls as the original document. Records showing the number of distribution of copies shall be maintained by the Office Supervisor and the log stored with the original documents. These measures shall not restrict reproduction for the purposes of mandatory review.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

NAMON KENT,

Plaintiff, vs.

CHASE BANK USA, N.A., a Corporation;

and DOES 1 THROUGH 100, INCLUSIVE,

Defendants.

No. 12-cv-1411

Hon. Ronald A. Guzman

DEFENDANT CHASE BANK USA, N.A.’S MOTION TO ENFORCE

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE TO DISMISS

SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

Chase Bank USA, N.A. (“Chase”), by and through its undersigned attorneys and pursuant

to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, respectfully requests that the Court

enter an Order enforcing the parties’ settlement agreement and dismissing all claims in the

Second Amended Complaint with prejudice, or in the alternative dismissing all claims in the

Second Amended Complaint with prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be

granted. In support of its motion, Chase incorporates its Memorandum of Points and Authorities

filed concurrently herewith.

Respectfully submitted,

By: /s/ Gregory Scott Gistenson

Alison C. Conlon

Gregory S. Gistenson

BARNES & THORNBURG LLP

One N. Wacker Dr., Suite 4400

Chicago, Illinois 60606

Telephone: (312) 357-1313

Facsimile: (312) 759-5646

Email: aconlon@btlaw.com;

gregory.gistenson@btlaw.com

Attorneys for Defendant Chase Bank USA, N.A.

CHDS01 813339v1

Case: 1:12-cv-01411 Document #: 57 Filed: 04/05/13 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:523
EXHIBIT “B”

Case: 1:12-cv-00481 Document #: 35-1 Filed: 02/21/13 Page 1 of 16 PageID #:465
Case: 1:12-cv-00481 Document #: 35-1 Filed: 02/21/13 Page 2 of 16 PageID #:466
Case: 1:12-cv-00481 Document #: 35-1 Filed: 02/21/13 Page 3 of 16 PageID #:467
Case: 1:12-cv-00481 Document #: 35-1 Filed: 02/21/13 Page 4 of 16 PageID #:468
Case: 1:12-cv-00481 Document #: 35-1 Filed: 02/21/13 Page 5 of 16 PageID #:469
Case: 1:12-cv-00481 Document #: 35-1 Filed: 02/21/13 Page 6 of 16 PageID #:470
Case: 1:12-cv-00481 Document #: 35-1 Filed: 02/21/13 Page 7 of 16 PageID #:471
Case: 1:12-cv-00481 Document #: 35-1 Filed: 02/21/13 Page 8 of 16 PageID #:472
Case: 1:12-cv-00481 Document #: 35-1 Filed: 02/21/13 Page 9 of 16 PageID #:473
Case: 1:12-cv-00481 Document #: 35-1 Filed: 02/21/13 Page 10 of 16 PageID #:474
Case: 1:12-cv-00481 Document #: 35-1 Filed: 02/21/13 Page 11 of 16 PageID #:475
Case: 1:12-cv-00481 Document #: 35-1 Filed: 02/21/13 Page 12 of 16 PageID #:476
Case: 1:12-cv-00481 Document #: 35-1 Filed: 02/21/13 Page 13 of 16 PageID #:477
Case: 1:12-cv-00481 Document #: 35-1 Filed: 02/21/13 Page 14 of 16 PageID #:478
Case: 1:12-cv-00481 Document #: 35-1 Filed: 02/21/13 Page 15 of 16 PageID #:479
Case: 1:12-cv-00481 Document #: 35-1 Filed: 02/21/13 Page 16 of 16 PageID #:480
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1






              CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
              ---------------------------------------------------


          We have issued our report dated December 15, 1999, accompanying the
consolidated financial statements and schedule included in the Annual Report of
Alpha Technologies Group, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended October 31, 1999.
We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the
Registration Statements of Alpha Technologies Group, Inc. on Forms S-8 (File No.
33-06695, effective June 23, 1986, File No. 33-11627, effective January 29,
1987, File No. 33-17359, effective September 28, 1987, File No. 33-20706,
effective March 17, 1988, File No. 33-29636, effective June 30, 1989, File No.
33-48663, effective June 23, 1992 and File No. 333-03001, effective April 30,
1996) and on Form S-3 (File No. 333-10311) which became effective August 16,
1996.

GRANT THORNTON LLP

 /s/ Grant Thornton LLP
-----------------------

Houston, Texas
January 31, 2000
#### 2014.407 Mistakes in bids.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

CENTRAL LABORERS PENSION )

FUND, et al., )

)

Plaintiffs, ) CIVIL ACTION

)

vs. ) NO. 12 C 1810

)

ES LIEB EXCAVATING, INC., ) JUDGE JOAN H. LEFKOW

an Illinois corporation, )

)

Defendant. )

MOTION FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT AND JUDGMENT

NOWCOME Plaintiffs, bytheir attorneys, andmove for entryof judgment bydefault against

Defendant,ES LIEB EXCAVATING,INC., an Illinois corporation, in the total amount of $8,537.57,

plus Plaintiffs’ court costs and reasonable attorneys’ fees in the amount of $1,076.25. 

On March 22, 2012, the Summons and Complaint was served on the Registered Agent by

tendering a copy of said documents to him personally at his place of business (a copy of the

Summons and Affidavit of Service is attached hereto). Therefore, Defendant’s answer was due on

April 12, 2012. As Defendant has failed to timely answer the Complaint, Plaintiffs respectfully

request entry of default and judgment.

/s/ Cecilia M. Scanlon 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned, an attorney of record, hereby certifies that she electronically filed the

foregoing document (Motion) with the Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system, and further

certifies that I have mailed the above-referenced document by United States Mail to the following

non-CM/ECF participant on or before the hour of 5:00 p.m. this 21st day of August 2012:

Mr. John R. Goley, Registered Agent

ES Lieb Excavating, Inc.

6 East Main Street

Freeport, IL 61032

/s/ Cecilia M. Scanlon 

Cecilia M. Scanlon

Attorney for Plaintiffs

BAUM SIGMAN AUERBACH & NEUMAN, LTD.

200 West Adams Street, Suite 2200

Chicago, IL 60606-5231

Bar No.: 6288574

Telephone: (312) 236-4316

Facsimile: (312) 236-0241

E-Mail: cscanlon@baumsigman.com

I:\CLJ\Lieb, ES\motion.cms.df.wpd
Exhibit 32(d)








CERTIFICATION
FURNISHED PURSUANT TO




18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,




AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q of Carolina Power & Light Company (the “Company”) for the
period ending September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Mark F. Mulhern, Senior Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:




(1)           the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)           the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.











/s/ Mark F.
Mulhern


Mark F.
Mulhern


Senior
Vice President and


Chief
Financial Officer


November
5, 2008








This
certification is being furnished and shall not be deemed filed by the Company
for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
or incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, or the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
#### 18.123 Assignment of claims.

The use of the no-setoff provision may be appropriate to facilitate the national defense in the event of a national emergency or natural disaster. (See 32.803(d).)

[71 FR 38248, July 5, 2006. Redesignated at 72 FR 46344, Aug. 17, 2007. Redesignated at 76 FR 18309, Apr. 1, 2011]
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

*Certificationspursuant to Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 Rule 13a-14 as adoptedpursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:*

 

I, Harvey Houtkin, ChiefExecutive Officer of Arbor Entech Corporation (the “Company”) certify that:

 

1.  I have reviewed this annual report onForm 10-KSB of the Company;

 

2. Basedon my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

 

3. Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant asof, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

 

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and I have:

 

a)designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that materialinformation relating to the Registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

 

b)evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annualreport (the Evaluation Date); and

 

c)presented in this annual report my conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures based on my evaluation as of the EvaluationDate;

 

5. Ihave disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the Registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of Registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent function):

 

a) allsignificant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls whichcould adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarizeand report financial data and have identified for the Registrant’s auditors anymaterial weaknesses in internal controls; and

 

b) anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the Registrant’s internal controls; and

 

6. Ihave indicated in this annual report whether or not there were significantchanges in internal controls or in other factors that could significantlyaffect internal controls subsequent to the date of my most recent evaluation,including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses.

 
| Date:  July 29, 2005 |
|---------------------------|
|                      |
| s/ Harvey Houtkin         |   |
| Harvey  Houtkin           |
| Chief  Executive Officer  |

 

----
TO: The Assistant Secretary

Office of Elementary and Secondary Education

FROM: The Secretary

SUBJECT: Amendment No. 4 to Delegation of Programmatic Authority

I. DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY

Under the authority vested in me by section 412 of the Department of Education 

Organization Act, 20 U.S.C. § 3472, I hereby delegate to you, your successor in 

function, and anyone serving for you in an acting capacity or delegated to 

perform the functions and duties of your position, the programmatic authorities 

described below:

A. authority with respect to the administration of the programs authorized 

under sections 311(a)(1), 311(a)(2), 312(a), 312(d), 313(a) of the Coronavirus 

Response and Relief Supplemental Appropriations (CRRSA) Act, 2021, Pub. L. 

No. 116-260 (December 27, 2020) and sections 2001(b)(1), 2001(b)(2), 2002, 

2005, and 11006 of the American Rescue Plan (ARP) Act of 2021, 

Pub. L. No. 117-2 (March 11, 2021); and,

B. authority to grant waivers under section 18008(b) of the Coronavirus Aid, 

Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act, Pub. L. No. 116-136 (March 27, 

2020), Division M, section 317 of the CRRSA Act, and section 2004(a)(2) of 

the ARP Act and exceptions under section 2004(c) of the ARP Act. 

Unless otherwise noted in future delegations of authority, amendments to the 

authorities delegated herein are included within the scope of this delegation.

II. RESERVATIONS

Unless otherwise noted in existing or future delegations of authority, the following 

are not delegated:

A. the authority to sign documents for publication in the Federal Register other 

than those documents designated in the blanket delegation of authority to 

sign Federal Register documents issued to Principal Officers, EA/GEN/19, 

certified on July 09, 2021;

B. the authority to appoint, and fix compensation of, members of advisory 

councils; and

C. unless otherwise provided by law, the authority to submit reports to 

Congress or the President.
III. REDELEGATION

Subject to applicable provisions of law, and unless otherwise noted, you may 

redelegate any of the authorities delegated to you, and may authorize further 

redelegation. All redelegations must be prepared in accordance with the 

Administrative Communications System directive, OM:1-102: Delegations of 

Authority, dated August 26, 2016.

IV. CERTIFICATION AND EFFECTIVE DATE

This delegation is effective upon certification by the Department’s Principal 

Delegations Control Officer.

I hereby ratify actions within the scope of this delegation taken by the 

addressee prior to the date of certification.

__________/s____________

Miguel A. Cardona

OGC Clearance and Date: Debbie Friendly ; 2/1/2022

Certification Date: 2/2/2022

Control #: EA/ES/104

Departmental Delegation Control Officer: Jim Clemmens
Case: 1:12-cv-01226 Document #: 61 Filed: 06/28/12 Page 1 of 13 PageID #:632
Case: 1:12-cv-01226 Document #: 61 Filed: 06/28/12 Page 2 of 13 PageID #:633
Case: 1:12-cv-01226 Document #: 61 Filed: 06/28/12 Page 3 of 13 PageID #:634
Case: 1:12-cv-01226 Document #: 61 Filed: 06/28/12 Page 4 of 13 PageID #:635
Case: 1:12-cv-01226 Document #: 61 Filed: 06/28/12 Page 5 of 13 PageID #:636
Case: 1:12-cv-01226 Document #: 61 Filed: 06/28/12 Page 6 of 13 PageID #:637
Case: 1:12-cv-01226 Document #: 61 Filed: 06/28/12 Page 7 of 13 PageID #:638
Case: 1:12-cv-01226 Document #: 61 Filed: 06/28/12 Page 8 of 13 PageID #:639
Case: 1:12-cv-01226 Document #: 61 Filed: 06/28/12 Page 9 of 13 PageID #:640
Case: 1:12-cv-01226 Document #: 61 Filed: 06/28/12 Page 10 of 13 PageID #:641
Case: 1:12-cv-01226 Document #: 61 Filed: 06/28/12 Page 11 of 13 PageID #:642
Case: 1:12-cv-01226 Document #: 61 Filed: 06/28/12 Page 12 of 13 PageID #:643
Case: 1:12-cv-01226 Document #: 61 Filed: 06/28/12 Page 13 of 13 PageID #:644
#### Richard Vittorino, an Infant, by His Guardian ad Litem, Josephine Vittorino, et al., Appellants, v. City of New York et al., Respondents.

Order entered October 22, 1964, denying plaintiffs’ motion to vacate a dismissal of the complaint for failure to proceed to trial, unanimously reversed on the law, on the facts, and, in the exercise of discretion, with $75 costs and disbursements to appellants, the motion to vacate the dismissal is granted, and the action is ordered restored to the Ready Personal Injury Jury Calendar, Supreme Court, Bronx County. It was an improvident exercise of discretion to dismiss the complaint when counsel for plaintiffs sought an adjournment of the trial to the next court day upon the grounds of illness. On the record, there is no basis for finding that the illness was feigned. In the circumstances, an adjournment of the cause was properly indicated. In vacating the dismissal, we in no way indicate our views as to the ultimate merit of plaintiffs’ cause. The resolution of that question must await a trial. Settle order on notice. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Valente, Stevens and Eager, JJ.
1205.101 Methods of disseminating information. ( a ) The DOT Office of Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590 publishes a Procurement Forecast of planned procurements each fiscal year on their website at *https://www.transportation.gov/osdbu/procurement-forecast/summary/ .*
#### 18.106 Acquisitions from Federal Prison Industries, Inc. (FPI).

Purchase from FPI is not mandatory and a waiver is not required if public exigency requires immediate delivery or performance (see 8.605(b)).

[72 FR 46344, Aug. 17, 2007]
No. 7762.

#### Snyder *v.*Coates.

(Decided November 24, 1903.)

Error to Circuit Court of Hancock county.

*Mr. Geo. F. Pendleton,*for plaintiff in error.

*Messrs. Blackford & Blackford,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Spear, Shauck and Crew, JJ., concur.
#### Alabama Great Southern Railroad Company *v.*Acuff.

January 24, 1913.

Action for damages. Before Judge Fite. Dade superior court. September 19, 1911.

*Maddox, McOamy & Shumate,*for plaintiff in error.

*Foust, Payne & Tatum,*contra.

Beck, J.

While there were some inaccuracies in those portions of the charge that were complained of, they were not of such a character as to require the grant of a new trial, and the evidence was sufficient to support the verdict.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*