alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 86 

To amend the Veterans Access, Choice, and Accountability Act of 2014 

to modify the termination date for the Veterans Choice Program. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 10, 2017 

Mr. MCCAIN (for himself and Mr. FLAKE) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend the Veterans Access, Choice, and Accountability 

Act of 2014 to modify the termination date for the 

Veterans Choice Program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Veterans Choice Con5 tinuation Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. MODIFICATION OF TERMINATION DATE FOR VET7 ERANS CHOICE PROGRAM. 

8 Section 101(p)(2) of the Veterans Access, Choice, 

9 and Accountability Act of 2014 (Public Law 113–146; 38 

10 U.S.C. 1701 note) is amended by striking ‘‘, or the date 


srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 86 IS

1 that is 3 years after the date of the enactment of this 

2 Act, whichever occurs first’’. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### 1804.470-2 Policy.

NASA IT security policies and procedures for unclassified information and IT are prescribed in NASA Policy Directive (NPD) 2810, Security of Information Technology; NASA Procedural Requirements (NPR) 2810, Security of Information Technology; and interim policy updates in the form of NASA Information Technology Requirements (NITR). IT services must be performed in accordance with these policies and procedures.

[72 FR 26561, May 10, 2007]
(January 30, 1979)

#### George T. Bacalakis, Appellant, v Pacific Marine Corporation (Delaware) et al., Respondents.

— Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on April 27, 1978, unanimously affirmed for the reasons stated by Kirschenbaum, J., at Special Term, without costs and without disbursements. Concur — Kupferman, J. P., Birns, Evans, Markewich and Lupiano, JJ.
<PAGE>

                                Ross Stores, Inc.
                              Fiscal 1999 Form 10-K
                                  Exhibit 10.32

January 26, 2000

Mel Wilmore
President, COO
Ross Stores, Inc.

8333 Central Avenue
Newark, CA 94560

Dear Mel:

Your contract shall be amended as follows:

1.   The first sentence in Paragraph 5.vii, shall now say "Until both the
     death of the Executive and the death of his spouse (strike "or the date
     of his 65th birthday, whichever occurs first"), the Executive shall be
     entitled to continue to participate (at no cost to the Executive) in the
     following Company employee benefit plans and arrangements in effect on
     the date hereof (or other benefit plans or arrangements providing
     substantially similar benefits) in which the Executive now participates:
     executive medical, dental, vision and mental health insurance.

2.   After amending the first sentence, another sentence will be added to
     Paragraph 5.vii stating "Until his death, the Executive shall be
     entitled to continue to participate (at no cost to the Executive) in the
     following Company employee benefit plans and arrangements in effect on
     the date hereof (or other benefit plans or arrangements providing
     substantially similar benefits) in which the Executive now participates:
     life insurance; accidental death and dismemberment insurance; travel
     insurance; group excess personal liability insurance; and matching of
     Executive's 401(k) and supplemental 401(k) contributions (the "Matching
     Contributions").

3.   Paragraph 5.ix, shall now say "Until his death (strike "or the date of
     his 65th birthday, whichever occurs first"), the Executive shall be
     reimbursed by the Company for any estate planning fees or expenses
     actually incurred by the Executive, up to the current annual limit of
     $10,000 (strike "up to a maximum annual reimbursement of $5000");
     provided, however, that such annual limit shall be increased from time
     to time consistent with increases in similar benefits provided to Norman
     Ferber.

Your signature below indicates that you agree with the amendments noted above.

/s/ Melvin A. Wilmore                  /s/ Michael A. Balmuth
-------------------------------------  -------------------------------------
Melvin A. Wilmore                      Michael A. Balmuth

President and Chief Operating Officer  Vice Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Date: January 27, 2000                 Date: January 27, 2000
#### 207.108 Additional requirements for telecommuting.

See PGI 207.108 for additional guidance concerning places of performance.

[87 FR 52339, Aug. 25, 2022]
IC 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 782 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 20, 2017 

Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

AN ACT 

To reauthorize the National Internet Crimes Against 

Children Task Force Program, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


rfrederick on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

S 782 RFH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Providing Resources, 

3 Officers, and Technology To Eradicate Cyber Threats to 

4 Our Children Act of 2017’’ or the ‘‘PROTECT Our Chil5 dren Act of 2017’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF THE NATIONAL INTERNET 

7 CRIMES AGAINST CHILDREN TASK FORCE 

8 PROGRAM. 

9 Title I of the PROTECT Our Children Act of 2008 

10 (42 U.S.C. 17601 et seq.) is amended— 

11 (1) in section 105(h) (42 U.S.C. 17615(h)), by 

12 striking ‘‘2016’’ and inserting ‘‘2022’’; and 

13 (2) in section 107(a)(10) (42 U.S.C. 

14 17617(a)(10)), by striking ‘‘fiscal year 2018’’ and 

15 inserting ‘‘each of fiscal years 2018 through 2022’’. 

Passed the Senate June 15, 2017. 

Attest: JULIE E. ADAMS, 

Secretary. 


rfrederick on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
0 10000 20000 30000 40000 50000

0 10000 20000 30000 40000 50000

Loan Principal

Min Earnings to Pass at 8/20 DTE minimum earnings to pass total debt/earnings > 1

Minimum earnings necessary to pass DE, various metrics

10 year amortization; .0445 int. rate
#### 1319.502 Setting aside acquisitions.
# Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed October 29

, 2014.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D14-2362

Lower Tribunal No. 13-11810

________________



### Gabriel Marckson

, Appellant,

vs.



### The State of Florida

, Appellee.

An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the

Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Jorge Rodriguez-Chomat

, Judge.

Gabriel Marckson

, in proper person.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before WELLS, EMAS and LOGUE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.Gabriel Marckson appeals from the trial court’s summary denial of his

timely motion for post-conviction relief. Although we agree with the trial court’s

determination that the motion was legally insufficient, we reverse and remand

because, rather than entering a final order denying the motion on its merits, the

trial court should have entered a non-final, non-appealable order dismissing the

motion with leave to amend within sixty days. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.850(f)(2);

Spera v. State

, 971 So. 2d 754 (Fla. 2007).

Reversed and remanded with directions to enter a non-final order dismissing

the motion with leave to file an amended motion within sixty days.

2
#### (A) In the Matter of the Claim of Frank Yakubec, Appellant, v. Armour & Company, Respondent. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent. (B) In the Matter of the Claim of Josephine A. Militello, Appellant, v. Rutland Dress Company et al., Respondents. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent. (C) In the Matter of the Claim of Ida Moinester, Appellant, v. Charles Kondazian, Inc., et al., Respondents. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent. (D) William G. Fincke, Plaintiff, v. David Lurie, Defendant. (E) In the Matter of the Claim of Sam Kittner, Appellant, v. V. Cosmopolitan Beef Co. et al., Respondents. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent. (F) Leonard B. Blowers, Appellant, v. Barbara Steiger et al., Respondents. (G) In the Matter of the Claim of Charles Kurtz, Appellant, v. Solomon Bros. Poultry Corp. et al., Respondents. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent. (H) In the Matter of the Claim of Isadore Korb, Appellant, v. Linden Trucking Company et al., Respondents. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent. (I) Suzanne de G. Hyde, Respondent, v. Everett Van Kleeck & Co., Inc., et al., Appellants. (J) Suzanne de G. Hyde, Respondent, v. Everett Van Kleeck & Co., Inc., et al., Appellants.

[In each action] Motions to dismiss appeals granted by default, without costs. Present — Bergan, P. J., Gibson, Herlihy, Reynolds and Taylor, JJ.
#### Laurel, Inc. *v.*State of Connecticut et al.

*Daniel Shepro,*in support of the motion.

Submitted September 18

decided October *2,*1974

The plaintiff’s “Petition to Waive Printing Requirements and to Alter the Time for Filing Briefs and for Having Oral Arguments” in the appeal from the Superior Court in Fairfield County is granted to the extent that this court will hear the appeal on copies of the record, briefs and appendices, typed or photographically reproduced, subject to subsequent filing of such documents as provided in § 723 of the Practice Book, as amended.
#### 1552.217-73 Option for increased quantity—cost-type contract.

As prescribed in 1517.208(d), insert this contract clause in cost-reimbursement type term form contracts when applicable. If only one option period is used, enter “NA” in the proper places of the clause. If more than two option periods apply, modify the clause accordingly.

# Option for Increased Quantity—Cost-Type Contract (JUN 1997)

(a) By issuing a contract modification, the Government may increase the estimated level of effort by \_\_\_\_ direct labor hours during the base period, \_\_\_\_ during the first option period, and \_\_\_\_ during the second option period. The Government may issue a maximum of \_\_\_\_ orders to increase the level of effort in blocks of \_\_\_\_ hours during any given period. The estimated cost and fixed fee of each block of hours is as follows:

| | Base period | Option 1 | Option 2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Estimated cost | | | |
| Fixed fee | | | |
| Total | | | |

(b) When these options are exercised, paragraph (a) of the “Level of Effort” clause and the “Estimated Cost and Fixed Fee” clause will be modified accordingly.

(c) If this contract contains “not to exceed amounts” for elements of other direct costs (ODCs), those amounts will be increased as follows:

| Other direct cost item | Option 1 | Option 2 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | | |
| | | |

(End of clause)

[[49 FR 8867](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/49-FR-8867), Mar. 8, 1984, as amended at [62 FR 37149](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/62-FR-37149), July 11, 1997; [62 FR 60667](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/62-FR-60667), Nov. 12, 1997]
This agreement for stock is between Gary S. Winterton, and WI Works.  This
stock compensation is for services rendered, as a board member, and consultant
to WI Works.  Compensation is as follows:

Compensation

1.  100,000 shares of restricted common stock with an option price of .40 per
share vested immediately and dated March of 1999 as an amendment to our
original agreement dated On March 22, 1999.

2.  50,000 shares of restricted common stock with an option price set by the
closing price of the stock on July 23, 1999 or .75.  These shares are fully
vested, and dated March of 1999.

3.  Your Board Compensation will remain as outlined with the exception of
considering an adjustment to the Strike price.  10,000 Shares vested
immediately, and dated March of 1999.  Adjusted strike price is set at .40 per
share.

4.  All shares are once vested March 1, 1999 will be registered to Gary S.
Winterton.  These shares will be registered for trading upon request from Gary
S. Winterton.

This agreement is grandfathered, and will survive any and all future
agreements between WI Works and any third party or other entity or
individuals.

Gary, You have been instrumental in our progress to date and I am grateful.
This compensation plan provides you with more shares than you had detailed in
your request.  I look forward to your continued involvement in the future of
World InterNetWorks as we begin to market our new business model.


Gary S. Winterton                          Steve Hansen
                                           CEO WI Works

/s/ Gary S. Winterton 8/12/99              /s/ Steve Hansen 8/12/99
-----------------------------              --------------------------

Notary

/s/ Kimberly Harris
-----------------------------
Kimberly Harris
213.7001 Procedures. ( a ) ( 1 ) For acquisitions that are otherwise appropriate to be conducted using procedures set forth in this part, and also eligible for the 8(a) Program, contracting officers may use— ( i ) For sole source purchase orders not exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the procedures in PGI 219.804-2(2); or
( ii ) For other types of acquisitions, the procedures in PGI 219.8, excluding the procedures in PGI 219.804-2(2); or
( 2 ) The procedures for award to the Small Business Administration in FAR subpart 19.8.
( b ) To comply with section 898 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (Pub. L. 114-92), contracting officers shall not use the sole source authority at FAR 6.302-5(b)(4) to purchase religious-related services to be performed on a U.S. military installation. For competitive purchases under the 8(a) program, contracting officers shall not exclude a nonprofit organization from the competition. See 219.270 for additional procedures.
[64 FR 2596, Jan. 15, 1999. Redesignated at 71 FR 3413, Jan. 23, 2006; 81 FR 65563, Sept. 23, 2016; 83 FR 16002, Apr. 13, 2018]
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

April 1, 2013

t0325

Order 

April 1, 2013

145841

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 145841

COA: 305076 

Ingham CC: 10-000296-FC

MICHAEL DUANE CORNELIUS,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 14, 2012 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
###### Editorial Note on Part 1822

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1822 appear at 66 FR 53547, Oct. 23, 2001.

#### 1822.103-5 Contract clause.

Insert the clause at 52.222-1, Notice to the Government of Labor Disputes, in all solicitations and contracts that exceed the simplified acquisition threshold.

[69 FR 21765, Apr. 22, 2004]
1542.705 Final indirect cost rates. ( a ) The EPA shall use the Contracting Officer determination procedure for all business units for which it shall be required to negotiate final indirect cost rates.
( b ) Contracting officers shall insert the clause at 1552.242-72, Financial Administrative Contracting officers (FACO), in cost-reimbursement contracts when the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is the cognizant federal agency and a FACO will be assigned.
[49 FR 8865, Mar. 8, 1984, as amended at 65 FR 58924, Oct. 3, 2000]
§ 536.55 Structured settlements. ( a ) The use of future periodic payments, including reversionary medical trusts, is encouraged to ensure that the injured party is adequately compensated and able to meet future needs. ( 1 ) It is necessary to ensure adequate care and compensation for a minor or other incompetent claimant or unemployed survivor over a period of years.
( 2 ) A medical trust is necessary to ensure the long-term availability of funds for anticipated future medical care, the cost of which is difficult to predict.
( 3 ) The injured party's life expectancy cannot be reasonably determined or is likely to be shortened.
( b ) Under subpart D of this part, structured settlements cannot be required but are encouraged in situations listed above or where state law permits them. In the case of a minor, every effort should be made to insure that the minor, and not the parents, receives the benefit of the settlement. Annuity payments at the age of majority should be considered. If rejected, a blocked bank account may be used.
( c ) It is the policy of the Department of Justice never to discuss the tax-free nature of a structured settlement.
Note to § 536.55 :
For further discussion, see DA Pam 27-162, paragraph 2-63.
16.206-3 Limitations. This contract type shall not be used unless— ( a ) The contract is for research and development and the estimated cost is the simplified acquisition threshold or less;
( b ) The contractor's accounting system is adequate for price redetermination;
( c ) There is reasonable assurance that the price redetermination will take place promptly at the specified time; and
( d ) The head of the contracting activity (or a higher-level official, if required by agency procedures) approves its use in writing.
[48 FR 42219, Sept. 19, 1983, as amended at 75 FR 53133, Aug. 30, 2010; 85 FR 40067, July 2, 2020]
LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS 

AC alternating current 

ACEEE American Council for Energy Efficient Economy 

AEC Annual Energy Consumption 

AEO Annual Energy Outlook 

AWG American wire gauge 

BES Business Expenses Survey (U.S. Census Bureau) 

BOM bill of materials 

C Celsius 

CAIR Clean Air Interstate Rule 

CAMR Clean Air Mercury Rule 

CAPM Capital Asset Pricing Model 

CD certificate of deposit 

CEE Consortium for Energy Efficiency 

CGS cost of goods sold 

CO carbon monoxide 

CO2 carbon dioxide 

CRML cold-rolled magnetic laminations 

CSA cross-sectional area 

CSCR capacitor-start, capacitor-run motor 

CSIR capacitor-start, induction-run motor 

CSL candidate standard level 

DC direct current 

DF discount factor 

DOE U.S. Department of Energy 

EC equipment class 

EERE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (DOE) 

EIA Energy Information Administration (DOE) 

EISA Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 

EMERF Electric Motor Education and Research Foundation 

EPA U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

EPACT Energy Policy Act 

EPCA Energy Policy and Conservation Act of 1975 

ERP equity risk premium 

FEMP Federal Energy Management Program (U.S. DOE) 

A-1 

EERE-2007-BT-STD-0007 COMMENT 07.2
GM gross margin 

GRIM Government Regulatory Impact Model 

Hg mercury 

HP horsepower 

HVAC heating ventilating and air conditioning 

IEC International Electrotechnical Commission 

ImSET Impact of Sector Energy Technologies Model 

I-O input-output 

kW kilowatt 

kWh kilowatt-hour 

LBNL Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory 

LCC life-cycle cost 

LSC labor-scaling costs 

M* M15, M19, M36, M47, M56 - grade of core steel 

MIA manufacturer impact analysis 

MPC manufacturer production cost 

MSP manufacturer selling price 

NAICS North American Industry Classification System 

NCI Navigant Consulting, Inc 

NEMA National Electrical Manufacturers Association 

NEMS National Energy Modeling System 

NEMS-BT National Energy Modeling System - Building Technologies 

NES national energy savings 

NFPA National Fire Protection Association 

NIA national impact analysis 

NLSC non-labor-scaling costs 

NOPM notice of public meeting 

NOPR notice of proposed rulemaking 

NOX nitrogen oxides 

NPV net present value 

OEM original equipment manufacturer 

OMB Office of Management and Budget 

PBIP plastic bonded iron powder 

PBP payback period 

PM particulate matter 

PNNL Pacific Northwest National Laboratory 

A-2 

EERE-2007-BT-STD-0007 COMMENT 07.2
A-3 

PSC permanent-split capacitor motor 

R&D research and development 

RMS root mean square 

RPM revolutions per minute 

SBA Small Business Administration 

SCF Survey of Consumer Finances 

SEC Securities and Exchange Commission 

SMMA Motors and Motion Association 

SO2 sulfur dioxide 

TSD technical support document 

U.S. United States 

UEC unit energy consumption 

WACC weighted average cost of capital 

μF microfarads 

EERE-2007-BT-STD-0007 COMMENT 07.2
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 6 (Monday, January 11, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1970-1971]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-00463]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

TIME AND DATE: Thursday, January 14, 2021 at 10:00 a.m.

PLACE: Virtual meeting. Note: Because of the covid-19 pandemic, we will 
conduct the open meeting virtually. If you would like to access the 
meeting, see the instructions below.

STATUS: This meeting will be open to the public. To access the virtual 
meeting, go to the commission's website

[[Page 1971]]

www.fec.gov and click on the banner to be taken to the meeting page.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 
Welcoming Remarks
Draft Advisory Opinion 2020-02: Bertrand
Audit Division Recommendation Memorandum on the Mississippi Republican 
Party (A17-05)
Audit Division Recommendation Memorandum on Van Drew for Congress (A19-
04)
Audit Division Recommendation Memorandum on the National Tooling & 
Machining Association (NTMA) Committee for a Strong Economy
(A19-10)
Proposed Final Audit Report on the Democratic Foundation of Orange 
County (A19-23)
Management and Administrative Matters

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Judith Ingram, Press Officer, 
Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

    Authority: Government in the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552b

Laura E. Sinram,
Acting Secretary and Clerk of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2021-00463 Filed 1-7-21; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6715-01-P
#### 1604.7101 Filing health benefit claims/court review of disputed claims.

Guidelines for a Federal Employees Health Benefit (FEHB) Program covered individual to file a claim for payment or service and for legal actions on disputed health benefit claims are found at 5 CFR 890.105 and 890.107, respectively. The contract clause at 1652.204-72 of this chapter, reflecting this guidance, must be inserted in all FEHB Program contracts.

[61 FR 15198, Apr. 5, 1996]