alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 831 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 831

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 120 West Pike Street in Canonsburg, Pennsylvania, as the ``Police 
             Officer Scott Bashioum Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                April 5 (legislative day, April 4), 2017

 Mr. Toomey (for himself and Mr. Casey) introduced the following bill; 
which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 120 West Pike Street in Canonsburg, Pennsylvania, as the ``Police 
             Officer Scott Bashioum Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. POLICE OFFICER SCOTT BASHIOUM POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 120 West Pike Street in Canonsburg, Pennsylvania, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Police Officer Scott Bashioum Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Police 
Officer Scott Bashioum Post Office Building''.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>   1
                                                                  Exhibit 4.1(b)

                      SERIES B CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK

         B - XXXX                                                 XXX

                              DECODE GENETICS, INC.
                      Series B Convertible Preferred Stock
              Incorporated Under the Laws of the State of Delaware
                           Par Value $0.001 Per Share

THIS CERTIFIES THAT _______________________ is the record holder of
_____________________________ (____) shares of the Series B Convertible
Preferred Stock of deCODE genetics, Inc., transferable on the books of the
Corporation by the holder hereof, in person or by duly authorized attorney, only
upon surrender of this Certificate properly endorsed.

A STATEMENT OF the rights, preferences, privileges and restrictions granted to
or imposed upon the respective classes or series of shares of stock of the
Corporation and upon holders thereof as established by the Certificate of
Incorporation or by any Certificate of Designation of Preferences, and the
number of shares constituting each series and the designations thereof, may be
obtained by any stockholder upon request and without charge at the principal
office of the Corporation.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused this Certificate to be signed by
its duly authorized officers as of ______________, 2000.



______________________________________     _____________________________________
DIANE M. FRENIER, ASSISTANT SECRETARY      KARI STEFANSSON,  PRESIDENT
<PAGE>   2




For Value Received, _____ hereby sell, assign and transfer
unto________________________________________
______________________________________Shares represented by the within
Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint
___________________________________ Attorney to transfer the said Shares on the
books of the within named Corporation with full power of substitution in the
premises.

         Dated ___________________

                  In the presence of _________________________________
From: Higgins, Cortney [mailto:Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov] 

Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2014 6:18 PM 

To: Wayland, Robertj 

Cc: Elman, Barry; Conner, Lisa; Vasu, Amy 

Subject: Request for Supporting Documents 

Hi Bob, 

I hope all is well! 

Can you send the following supporting documents referenced in the preamble? If you can’t send 

them over immediately, can you give me a sense of when you’ll be sending them? 

- Greenhouse Gas Abatement Measures TSD (p. 101 and forward) 

- Goal Computation TSD (p. 145 and forward) 

- Existing State Actions TSD (p. 152 footnote) 

- Legal Issues Memo (p. 184 and forward) 

- State Plan Considerations TSD (p. 222 and forward) 

- Projecting Emission Performance: Mass-Based Goals and Plan Performance TSD (p. 222 

and forward) 

Please give me a call if you have any questions. 

Regards, 

Cortney 

________________________________________________ 

Cortney Higgins, PhD 

Policy Analyst 

OMB/OIRA/NRE 

202.395.7856 

chiggins@omb.eop.gov
#### 204.470 U.S.-International Atomic Energy Agency Additional Protocol.
#### 209.570 Limitations on contractors acting as lead system integrators.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
the applicable SEC Form and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           1,062
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,813
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      4,949
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                15,897
<PP&E>                                          23,347
<DEPRECIATION>                                  13,638
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  25,606
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,350
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,926
<OTHER-SE>                                       8,548
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    25,606
<SALES>                                         19,300
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                19,300
<CGS>                                            9,772
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    9,772
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,828
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  93
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,607
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,545
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,062
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,062
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.87
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.87
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice of Meeting.

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel's Tax Forms and Publications Project Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Wednesday, February 10, 2021.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Fred Smith at 1-888-912-1227 or (202) 317-3087.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that a meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel's Tax Forms and Publications Project Committee will be held Wednesday, February 10, 2021 at 11:00 a.m. Eastern Time. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited time and structure of meeting, notification of intent to participate must be made with Fred Smith. For more information please contact Fred Smith at 1-888-912-1227 or (202) 317-3087, or write TAP Office, 1111 Constitution Ave. NW, Room 1509, Washington, DC 20224 or contact us at the website:                     *http://www.improveirs.org.*

Dated: January 15, 2021.

Kevin Brown,

Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel. 

[FR Doc. 2021-01377 Filed 1-21-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
**Exhibit 31.1** **Certifications**     I, J. Collier Sparks, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this annual report on    Form 10-K    of MDI, Inc.;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any    untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material    fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the    circumstances under which such statements were made, not    misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and    other financial information included in this report, fairly    present in all material respects the financial condition,    results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,    and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I    are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure    controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act    Rules 13a-15(e)    and    15d-15(e))    for the registrant and have:     a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or    caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed    under our supervision, to ensure that material information    relating to the registrant, including its consolidated    subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those    entities, particularly during the period in which this report is    being prepared;     b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s    disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report    our conclusions about the effectiveness of the controls and    procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report    based on such evaluation; and     c. Disclosed in this report any change in the    registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that    occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter    that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to    materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over    financial reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I    have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal    control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s    auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board    of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in    the design or operation of internal control over financial    reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the    registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and    report financial information; and     b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves    management or other employees who have a significant role in the    registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.      By     /s/  By J. Collier Sparks    J. Collier Sparks    Chief Executive Officer     Dated: March 31, 2006
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Logjam timber sale [electronicresource].**
 
FinalEnvironmental Impact Statement | Record of Decision
 
SuDoc Number:A 13.105/2:R 10-MB-701 A-B
Item Number:0082-A-05 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000657666
 
January 10, 2020
1901.104-1 Publication and code arrangement. ( a ) The IAAR is published in the Federal Register and, in cumulative form in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR).
( b ) The IAAR is issued as chapter 19 of title 48, CFR.
Case: 1:11-cv-07972 Document #: 104 Filed: 08/09/13 Page 1 of 11 PageID #:877
Case: 1:11-cv-07972 Document #: 104 Filed: 08/09/13 Page 2 of 11 PageID #:878
Case: 1:11-cv-07972 Document #: 104 Filed: 08/09/13 Page 3 of 11 PageID #:879
Case: 1:11-cv-07972 Document #: 104 Filed: 08/09/13 Page 4 of 11 PageID #:880
Case: 1:11-cv-07972 Document #: 104 Filed: 08/09/13 Page 5 of 11 PageID #:881
Case: 1:11-cv-07972 Document #: 104 Filed: 08/09/13 Page 6 of 11 PageID #:882
Case: 1:11-cv-07972 Document #: 104 Filed: 08/09/13 Page 7 of 11 PageID #:883
Case: 1:11-cv-07972 Document #: 104 Filed: 08/09/13 Page 8 of 11 PageID #:884
Case: 1:11-cv-07972 Document #: 104 Filed: 08/09/13 Page 9 of 11 PageID #:885
Case: 1:11-cv-07972 Document #: 104 Filed: 08/09/13 Page 10 of 11 PageID #:886
Case: 1:11-cv-07972 Document #: 104 Filed: 08/09/13 Page 11 of 11 PageID #:887
#### Carlton *v.*Seaboard Air-Line Railway.

April 17, 1913.

Petition for injunction; from Polk. Motion to dismiss.

*Mundy & Mundy,*for plaintiff.

*W. G. Loving*and *E. S. Ault,*for defendant.

Beck, J.

It appearing from the petition in this case and the bill of exceptions to the refusal of an interlocutory injunction that a judgment refusing injunctive relief alone is complained of, and it further appearing that no supersedeas was granted upon the refusal of injunction in the court below, and that the acts against which an injunction was sought have been performed and completed, which facts have been made duly to appear to this court and are not controverted by the plaintiif in error, the writ of error will be dismissed. *Moody*v. *Georgia Ry. & Power Co.,*139 *Ga.*102 (76 S. E. 857), and cases there cited.

*Writ of error dismissed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
#### 1346.710 Contract clauses.

The warranty clauses and alternates under FAR Subpart 46.710 may be used in solicitations and contracts.
215.371-1 Policy. It is DoD policy, if only one offer is received in response to a competitive solicitation— ( a ) To take the required actions to promote competition (see 215.371-2); and
( b ) To ensure that the price is fair and reasonable (see 215.371-3) and to comply with the statutory requirement for certified cost or pricing data (see FAR 15.403-4).
[77 FR 39138, June 29, 2012]
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 17

- 3659

_____________________________
J OSEPH T ETHER , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Du val County

. Russell Healey , Judge

. April 20, 2018

P ER C URIAM

.
D ISMISSED

. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.110(b); Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(3). Any request for belated appeal must be filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(c).

W OLF , R OBERTS , an d W ETHERELL , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Joseph Tether, pro se
, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney Gen eral, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
**Exhibit 10.0**

BRIGGS & STRATTON CORPORATION 

Form 10-Q for Quarterly Period Ended March 30, 2008 

AMENDMENT TO 

BRIGGS & STRATTONCORPORATION 

KEY EMPLOYEE SAVINGS AND INVESTMENT PLAN 

Effective January 1, 2008 

**AMENDMENT**

**TO**

**BRIGGS & STRATTON CORPORATION**

**KEY EMPLOYEE SAVINGS AND INVESTMENT PLAN**

WHEREAS, Briggs & Stratton Corporation sponsors the Briggs & Stratton Corporation Key Employee Savings and Investment Plan (the “Plan”); and 

WHEREAS, interest credited to the accounts of participants under that Plan has been based upon the prime rate determined on a quarterly basis and it isdesirable instead to credit interest based on the prime rate as in effect each day; 

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT AND IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED thatSection 5.1 of the Plan is hereby amended effective as of January 1, 2008 to revise Section 5.1 thereof to read as follows: 

5.1 Crediting of Interest. 

A Participant’s Account shall be credited with interest each day at a rate equal to 80% ofthe Prime Rate at US Bank on such day divided by Three Hundred Sixty Five (365). Interest shall be credited each day with respect to the Participant’s closing Account balance for the previous day. A Participant’s Account shall be creditedwith interest until the Valuation Date preceding the date distribution of such Account is completed. 

FURTHER RESOLVED, that the foregoingamendment shall apply both to the provisions of the Plan governing amounts deferred prior to January 1, 2005 and to the provisions of the plan governing amounts deferred on or after January 1, 2005. 

 

2
#### 2131.201 General.
#### 1315.602 Policy.

In accord with FAR 16.602, the DOC encourages the submission of new and innovative ideas which support the DOC mission.
1816.405-273 Award fee evaluations. ( a ) *Service contracts.* On contracts where the contract deliverable is the performance of a service over any given time period, contractor performance is definitively measurable within each evaluation period. In these cases, all evaluations are final, and the contractor keeps the fee earned in any period regardless of the evaluations of subsequent periods. Unearned award fee in any given period in a service contract is lost and shall not be carried forward, or “rolled-over,” into subsequent periods.
( b ) *End item contracts.* On contracts, such as those for end item deliverables, where the true quality of contractor performance cannot be measured until the end of the contract, only the last evaluation is final. At that point, the total contract award fee pool is available, and the contractor's total performance is evaluated against the award fee plan to determine total earned award fee. In addition to the final evaluation, interim evaluations are done to monitor performance prior to contract completion, provide feedback to the contractor on the Government's assessment of the quality of its performance, and establish the basis for making interim award fee payments (see 1816.405-276(a)). These interim evaluations and associated interim award fee payments are superseded by the fee determination made in the final evaluation at contract completion. However, if the final award fee adjectival rating is higher or lower than the average adjectival rating of all the interim award fee periods, or if the final award fee score is eight base percentage points higher or lower than the average award fee score of all interim award fee periods (*e.g.* 80% to 88%), then the Head of the Contracting Activity (HCA) or the Deputy Chief Acquisition Officer (if the HCA is the Fee Determination Official) shall review and concur in the final award fee determination. The Government will then pay the contractor, or the contractor will refund to the Government, the difference between the final award fee determination and the cumulative interim fee payments.
( c ) *Control of evaluations.* Interim and final evaluations may be used to provide past performance information during the source selection process in future acquisitions and should be marked and controlled as “Source Selection Information—see FAR 3.104”. See FAR 42.1503(h) regarding the requirements for releasing Source Selection Information included in the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS).
[63 FR 13133, Mar. 18, 1998, as amended at 80 FR 12937, Mar. 12, 2015; 81 FR 50366, Aug. 1, 2016]
ILND 450 (Rev. 10/13) Judgment in a Civil Action

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Christine M. Jones,

Plaintiff(s),

v.

Union Pacific Railroad Company,

Defendant(s).

Case No. 12 CV 771

Judge Joan Humphrey Lefkow 

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE

Judgment is hereby entered (check appropriate box):

in favor of plaintiff(s)

and against defendant(s)

in the amount of $ ,

which includes pre–judgment interest. 

does not include pre–judgment interest.

Post-judgment interest accrues on that amount at the rate provided by law from the date of this judgment. 

Plaintiff(s) shall recover costs from defendant(s).

in favor of defendant(s) Union Pacific Railroad Company

and against plaintiff(s) Christine M. Jones

.

Defendant(s) shall recover costs from plaintiff(s).

other:

This action was (check one):

tried by a jury with Judge Joan Humphrey Lefkow presiding, and the jury has rendered a verdict. 

tried by Judge without a jury and the above decision was reached. 

decided by Judge on a motion

Date: 9/28/2016 Thomas G. Bruton, Clerk of Court

Michael Dooley, Deputy Clerk

Case: 1:12-cv-00771 Document #: 261 Filed: 09/28/16 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:9825
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

US BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION 

FOR THE GSAMP TRUST 2006-HE6 

MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH 

CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2006-HE6,

 Plaintiff,

v.

BLANCA BUSTOS,

 Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No: 12-cv-2505

Judge: Robert M. Dow, Jr.

MOTION FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT OF FORECLOSURE NUNC PRO TUNC

NOW COMES the Plaintiff, US BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE 

GSAMP TRUST 2006-HE6 MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 

2006-HE6, by and through its attorney, Megan Christine Adams, and moves this Honorable 

Court for Entry of Judgment of Foreclosure nunc pro tunc July 24, 2012. In support thereof, 

Plaintiff states as follows:

1. On April 5, 2012 Plaintiff filed its Complaint to Foreclose Mortgage.

2. On July 24, 2012 the Court granted Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment and the 

minute entry stated “Entry Judgment of Foreclosure.” [ECF #10]

3. For reasons unknown, a Judgment of Foreclosure was never entered.

4. Therefore, Plaintiff seeks a Judgment of Foreclosure so that Plaintiff may proceed with 

the sale of this foreclosed property.

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully requests that a Judgment of Foreclosure be entered 

nunc pro tunc July 24, 2012. Plaintiff will provide a draft order reflecting the figures contained 

in the affidavits already on the record. [ECF #5-2, 5-3].

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Megan Christine Adams

Megan Christine Adams ARDC#6312221

Potestivo & Associates, P.C.

223 West Jackson Blvd, suite 610

Chicago, IL 60601

(312)263-0003