alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Annual Report of Team, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended May 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Philip J. Hawk, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                    
|------------------------------------
|/s/ PHILIP J. HAWK                  
|Philip J. Hawk                      
|Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
|August 1, 2011
#### DENNIS-WICKER, Respondent, v. VILLAGE OF ELMIRA HEIGHTS, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

November 11, 1903.)

Action by Florence O. Dennis-Wicker against the village of Elmira Heights.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.

HOUGHTON, J., not voting.
# November 2020
#### Anita Maiolo, Respondent, v James P. De Mare, Respondent, and *1012Isam A. Sakati et al., Doing Business as Syrian American Realty Co., Appellants.

Order unanimously reversed, without costs, and motion granted. Memorandum: Defendants Sakati and Adams appeal from that part of an order of Special Term which denied leave to amend their pleading by adding an additional cause of action sounding in fraud in their cross claim against the defendant De Mare. Plaintiff commenced this action for ejectment in July, 1975. She alleges that a one-story ranch-style house constructed on land now owned by Sakati and Adams encroaches upon her adjoining property. Sakati and Adams acquired their property from De Mare, the builder of the house, on May 22, 1975. The note of issue and statement of readiness were filed in February, 1976 and the matter was scheduled for trial on May 23, 1977. Shortly before the trial date, the recently substituted attorney for Sakati and Adams learned that De Mare had been informed by plaintiff of the claimed encroachment prior to De Mare’s sale of the premises to Sakati and Adams. It is upon this newly discovered fact that Sakati and Adams seek to premise an additional cross claim that De Mare knowingly made false representations to them upon which they relied in purchasing the property. CPLR 3025 (subd [b]) permits a party to amend his pleading "at any time by leave of court” and provides that such leave "shall be freely given upon such terms as may be just”. We have repeatedly held that where a case has long been certified ready for trial, the moving party must furnish an affidavit of reasonable excuse for the delay in making the motion and must demonstrate that there is merit in the proposed amendment (see, e.g., *Pick v McCombs,*57 AD2d 1078; *Walter v Le Cesse Corp.,*54 AD2d 1136; *Barry v Niagara Frontier Tr. System,*38 AD2d 878). Here it is clear that Sakati and Adams have satisfied those requirements and in the absence of "prejudice or surprise resulting directly from the delay,” neither of which reasonably may be claimed by De Mare, the amendment to the cross claim should have been permitted *(Fahey v County of Ontario,*44 NY2d 934, 935; see *Leonard v Davenport & Sons,*41 AD2d 526; *Belott v State of New York,*40 AD2d 729; *Lermit Plastics Co. v Lauman & Co.,*40 AD2d 680). (Appeal from order of Oneida Supreme Court -amend answer and cross claim.) Present-Marsh, P. J., Cardamone, Dillon, Schnepp and Witmer, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000318380
<NAME>                                               Public Storage, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                                1
<CURRENCY>                                                  US
       
<S>                                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                               12-Mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                           Dec-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                              Jan-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                                Dec-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                             1
<CASH>                                                      26,856,000
<SECURITIES>                                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                                               25,016,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                                0
<INVENTORY>                                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                            51,872,000
<PP&E>                                                      2,221,313,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                              (297,655,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                              2,572,152,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                       41,467,000
<BONDS>                                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                       0
<PREFERRED>                                                 833,829,000
<COMMON>                                                    9,537,000
<OTHER-SE>                                                  1,462,071,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                2,572,152,000
<SALES>                                                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                            341,122,000
<CGS>                                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                               99,237,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                            70,491,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                          8,482,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                             0
<INCOME-TAX>                                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                         153,549,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                             0
<CHANGES>                                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                                153,549,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                               1.10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                               1.10
        

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION**


**PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 13a-14(b) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
      1934**


**AND
      18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Sparta Commercial Services, Inc. (the
      “Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2006, as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date therein specified (the
      “Report”), the undersigned, Anthony L. Havens, as Chief Executive Officer and
      Principal Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, that:





(1)  the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/
      Anthony L. Havens


Anthony
      L. Havens


Chief
      Executive Officer


and
      Principal Financial Officer





Date:
      August 22, 2006
Charles G. 

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

March 27, 2015

No. 04-15-00158-CV

Sandy SCHIREL,

Appellant

v.

Charles G. TATE,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 3, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015CV000835

Honorable Jason Wolff, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Appellant's Emergency Motion for Stay is hereby DENIED.

_________________________________

Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 27th day of March, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Student name/ 

identifier; date 

issued (right side)

Individual student’s 

cost of attendance

Student Aid 

Index based on 

FAFSA and 

Institutional 

Methodology

The sum of each 

grant subcategory appears 

here; campusbased FSEOG and 

TEACH Grants 

would appear here 

under

"Institutional 

Grants"

NET PRICE

Federal loan

amounts

you are eligible for

Aid awarded by 

school but 

earned through 

work

School contact 

details for more 

information and 

next steps

Space for institution 

to send custom

message

NOTE: Institutions may contact Collegefinancingplan@ed.gov to indicate their commitment to use the College Financing Plan. Students, parents, and 

institutions may also direct questions about the College Financing Plan to that e-mail address. Visit the College Financing Plan’s page on the Office of 

Postsecondary Education’s Web page for resources and background about the development and adoption of the College Financing Plan: 

http://www2.ed.gov/policy/highered/guid/aid-offer/index.html.

ANNOTATED

College Financing Plan Questions? Collegefinancingplan@ed.gov
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

DOUGLAS M. THIGPEN, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. ) No. 12 C 1642

) (03 CR 1084)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

)

Respondent. )

MEMORANDUM ORDER

Douglas Thigpen (“Thigpen”) has just submitted a partly

typed, partly hand-printed document that he has captioned “Claim

for Return of Property, and Motion To Render Property to Power of

Attorney.” Although that self-prepared document states that the

filing was made “pursuant to Title 28 U.S.C.S. §1738 of the

Federal Civil Procedure,” that statute clearly has no relevance

to Thigpen’s stated purpose of obtaining the return of certain

property that was assertedly taken from him at the time of his

arrest more than eight years ago (he lists the date as

November 13, 2003). But in any event, Thigpen goes on to state

that he is in the process of using the Freedom of Information Act

to “determin[e] the actual whereabouts of the property,” and the

only request that he has made is that his motion be filed “and

that the proceedings be stayed until further notice” (emphasis in

original).

Under those circumstances, because there are no

“proceedings” of any nature before this Court, so that there is
nothing to be stayed, it is pointless for the Clerk’s Office to

have opened a civil case number for Thigpen’s claim. This action

(if it can be termed an action at all) is therefore ordered

dismissed, without prejudice of course to the possibility that

some related matter may arise in the future that is within this

Court’s jurisdiction.

________________________________________

Milton I. Shadur

Senior United States District Judge

Date: March 9, 2012

2
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   Exhibit 10.24



               STOCK OPTIONS CANCELLATION AGREEMENT

                         TIMOTHY J. LORELLO

For value received, sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, Timothy J.
Lorello (the "Optionee") hereby relinquishes claim to, and agrees to the
cancellation of Options to purchase 100,000 shares of Class B Common stock in
TeleCommunication Systems, Inc. (the "Company") under the following
circumstances:

Optionee Agreement dated July 29, 1998 granted Optionee a total of 139,437
Options at a purchase price of $0.28 per share. If Optionee remains an employee
of the Company on August 26, 2000, 33,334 of those Options shall be canceled.
If Optionee remains an employee of the Company on August 26, 2001, 33,333 of
the remaining Options shall be cancelled. If Optionee remains an employee of
the Company on August 26, 2002, 33,333 of the remaining Options shall be
canceled. In all cases, Options shall be canceled from unvested balances prior
to cancellation of vested Options.

These cancellations will leave a total of 39,437 Options from this grant
remaining at a purchase price of $0.28 per share.

This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws
of the State of Maryland and shall be binding upon the executors,
administrators, heirs and assigns of Timothy J. Lorello.

Date:   8/27/99
     -------------------

/s/ Timothy J. Lorello
------------------------
Timothy J. Lorello


State of Maryland, County of Anne Arundel, ss.

     On this the 27 day of August, 1999, before me, Bruce A. White, the
undersigned officer, personally appeared Timothy J. Lorello, known to me to be
the person whose name is subscribed to with the within instrument and
acknowledged that he executed the same for the purposes therein contained. In
witness whereof, I hereunto set my hand and official seal.


/s/ Bruce A White
----------------------
Notary Public

06/01/03
----------------------
My Commission Expires


[NOTARY PUBLIC SEAL]
#### 2001.404 Class deviations.

Class deviations affect more than one contracting action. Where deviations from the FAR or NRCAR are considered necessary for classes of contracts, requests for authority to deviate must be submitted in writing to the Director, Division of Contracts and Property Management, who will consider the submission jointly with the Chairperson of the Civilian Agency Acquisition Council, as appropriate.
Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

Docket Number: FAA- 2011-1224

Directorate Identifier: 2011NM175AD

Hamilton-Sundstrand ERPS10G-24-1 --- 2/9/11

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008
1 

### Whalen, Marilyn

From: Shimabuku, June T. CIV NAVFAC HI, EV4 <june.shimabuku@navy.mil>

Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2015 6:31 PM

To: roxanne.kwan@doh.hawaii.gov; Richard Ta kaba (richard.takaba@doh.hawaii.gov)

Cc: Pallarino, Bob; Linder, Steven; Lovgren, A ndrew C LCDR, NAVSUP FLCPH C700; Kishaba,

Raelynn I CIV NAVFAC HI, EV4; Tsutsui, Bruce O CIV NAVFAC HI, OPHE3; Mizuno, Arleen

M CIV NAVFAC HI, PRJ412; steven.chang@doh.hawaii.gov;

stuart.yamada@doh.hawaii.gov; aaron.poentis@navy. mil; Shimabuku, June T. CIV NAVFAC

HI, EV4

Subject: RE: RED HILL STATUS REPORT - March 24 2015

(Submitting for Aaron.)

Hi Richard/Roxanne:

Attached are the updated information for the weekly progress report from Navy Region Hawaii, and the Fleet Logistic

Center Pearl Harbor for the week of March 24, 2015. In a process to ease reading, only sections with changes will be

annotated.

1. Preliminary Work Plan

Action complete.

2. Release Response Action Items (initiate immediately, complete as soon as practicable)

a. Action 1

‐ Provide a schedule for the ventilation of Tank 5 and an estimated date to commence the investigation of

release point(s) within Tank 5.

Action complete.

b. Action 2

‐ The rate of vertical migration for the released JP

‐ 8 free product is unknown. Information from the

previously collected basalt cores could be used for initial modeling of vertical migration. This information is necessary to

protect drinking water resources from petroleum contamination. Prepare models for petroleum JP

‐ 8 releases of 10,000,

20,000 and 30,000 gallons from points at 25% intervals from the bottom to the top of Tank 5.

No change.

c. Action 3

‐ Removal of petroleum free product from the area outside the tank will reduce downward migration of

the released JP

‐ 8 free product. Characterization of the free product plume and recovery of free product with increased

monitoring are required to address this plume.

No change.

d. Action 4

‐ Additional studies and procedures are required to address the potential and impact of any future

releases from the USTs within the Complex. This will require new financial and personnel resources to complete.

Funding for the preliminary work plan and all necessary following work is critical.

d.(1) Groundwater Monitoring Wells

January monitoring results for RHMW06 and RHMW07 submitted on 3/20/2015. Well Installation Report will be

submitted by end of next week.2 d.(2) Site Characterization

No change.

d.(3) AOC/SOW

Discussions are ongoing.

d.(4) Request for Additional Information

No change.

d.(5) BWS/USGS Groundwater Flow Study

No change.

Please feel free to contact us if you have any questions.

v/r,

June
Appeal No. 74-226.

#### Thomas R. Merlino *et al. v.*Tax Assessors for the Town of North Providence.

*Norman L. Grant, Thomas B. Merlino,*pro se, for appellants. *Louis Baruch Rubinstein, Robert S. Ciresi,*for appellees.

Motion of appellees for authorization to file brief in excess of 50 pages granted.

Paolino, J. not participating.
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

OCTOBER 31, 2006

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 06-12626

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 03-03973-CV-WSD-1

BETTIE J. LITTLE,

DIEDRE M. GOODWIN,

Plaintiffs-Appellants, 

versus

COBB COUNTY,

Defendant-Appellee. 

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Georgia

_________________________

(October 31, 2006)

Before WILSON, PRYOR and FAY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
2

The summary judgment granted in favor of Cobb County is affirmed for the

reasons set forth in the ORDER of the United States DistrictJudge entered March 30,

2006, and so much of the Report and Recommendation of the United States

Magistrate Judge as is adopted therein.

AFFIRMED.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 5.1.1

Eastern Division

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as Receiver

for Broadway Bank

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.:

1:12−cv−01665

Honorable John F.

Grady

Demetris Giannoulias, et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Wednesday, January 16, 2013:

 MINUTE entry before Honorable John F. Grady: The defendants' motions to

dismiss [26, 29, 30] are denied. A status hearing is set for January 23, 2013 at 11:00 a.m.

Mailed notice(cdh, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:12-cv-01665 Document #: 54 Filed: 01/16/13 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:851
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 5.0.3

Eastern Division

Federal Trade Commission

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:12−cv−01028

Honorable Robert M. Dow Jr.

American Credit Crunchers, LLC, et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Friday, October 26, 2012:

 MINUTE entry before Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr: In light of the entry of

STIPULATION FINAL JUDGMENT and Order for Permanent Injunction [49], the

MOTION by Plaintiff Federal Trade Commission to strike [37] Affirmative Defenses is

stricken without prejudice. Mailed notice(tbk, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:12-cv-01028 Document #: 50 Filed: 10/26/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:1085
No. 8419.

#### The State ex rel. *v.*The Toledo Railway & Terminal Co.

(Decided November 10, 1903.)

Error to Circuit Court of Lucas county. '

*Mr. B. A. Hayes,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. J. K. Hamilton; Mr. Clarence .Brown*and *Messrs. King é Tracy,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Burket, C. J., Spear, Davis, Shauck and Price, JJ., concur.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 5.0.3

Eastern Division

Hard Drive Productions, Inc.

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:12−cv−01532

Honorable Edmond E. Chang

Does 1−54, et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Monday, July 23, 2012:

 MINUTE entry before Honorable Edmond E. Chang: The Court still has the

motion to compel [13], and motions to quash [12, 18], under advisement. Status hearing of

07/24/12 is reset to 08/27/12 at 9:00 a.m. Mailed notice(slb, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:12-cv-01532 Document #: 32 Filed: 07/23/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:235