# .. SIP SUBMITTAL COMPLETENESS CRITERIA CHECKLIST (In accordance with 40 CFR Part 51

- App. V) SIP Submitted by: VADepartment ofEnvironmental Quality

Date Submitted: September 27,2010 Subject: Revision C08: Permits for Major Stationary Sources and Major Modifications Locating in PSD Areas and Permits for Major Stationary Sources and MajorModifications Locating in Nonattainment Areas orthe OTR Completeness Review Completed by: Gerallyn Duke Date Completed: March 24, 2011 Administrative Materials

r EPA REQUIREMENT 1. A formal letter ofsubmittal from the Governor orhis designee, Irequesting EPA approval ofthe plan orrevision thereof. 2. Evidence that the State has adopted the plan in the State code or [body ofregulations; orissued the permit, order, or consent agreement in final form. That evidence shall include the date of adoption or final issuance as well as the effective date ofthe plan, if different from the adoption/issuance date. Check to see ifthe regulation, permit, order or consent decree has a sunset or expiration date. Ifso it is not acceptable as a SIP submission.

3. Evidence that the State has the necessary legal authorityunder State law to adopt and implement the plan.

### ~. A copy ofactual regulation, or document submitted for approval and incorporationbyreference into the plan, including indication of he changes made to the existing approved plan, where applicable. [The submittal shall be a copy ofthe official State 1.

2.

3.

4. ACCEPTABLE

STATE SUBMITTAL 

# 6J1

Letter from Virginia Department ofEnvironmental X Quality dated 9/27/10 signed byDavid Paylor (designee) SIP package contains copy ofVADEQ regulations- X Article 8 of9V AC5 Chapter 80 Permits for Major Stationary Sources and MajorModifications Locating in Prevention ofSignificant Deterioration Areas and Article 9 of9VAC5 Chapter 80 Permits for Major Stationary Sources and MajorModifications Locating in Nonattainment Areas Date ofadoption: 12/15/08 Effective date: 7/23/09 No sunset or expiration date Noted in Volume 25, Issue 30 ofVirginia Register of X Regulations dated 6/8/09. Authority is § 10.1-1308 ofthe Code ofVirginia Copy ofregulation showing changes and effective date is X included in submittal.egulation/document signed, stamped, dated bythe appropriate State official indicating that it is fully enforceablebythe State. The effective date ofthe regulation/document shall, whenever possible, be indicated in the document itself. 5. Evidence that the State followed all ofthe procedural 5. Certification ofcompliance with state administrative X requirements ofthe State's laws and constitution in conducting and procedures and proofofpublic hearing notices is provided. coml'leting the adoption/issuance ofthe plan. 6. Evidence that public notice was given ofthe proposed change 6. Proofofpublication ofpublic notice in the Washington X consistent with procedures approved byEPA, including the date of Examiner on August 4,2010 is provided. publication ofsuch notice. 7. Certification that publichearings were held in accordance with 7. Certification ofPublic Participation Activities states that X he information provided in the public notice and the State's laws the public notices included procedures to afford thepublic and constitution, ifapplicable. the opportunity to request that a hearing be held and that no such request was received. 8. Compilation ofpublic comments and the State's response thereto. No comments were received/information provided X 8. Technical Materials 1. Identification ofall regulated pollutants affected bythe plan. 1. Regulations regarding regulated new source review (NSR) X pollutants and hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) in Virginia 

## 2. Identification ofthe locations ofaffected sources including the 2. Major Stationary Sources and Major Modifications EPA attainmentlnonattainment designation ofthe locations and the Locating in Prevention ofSignificant Deterioration Areas X status ofthe attainment plan for the affected area(s). and in Nonattainment Areas

3. Quantification ofthe changes inplan allowable emissions from 3. N/A X he affected sources; estimates ofchanges in current actual emissions from affected sources or, where appropriate, quantification ofchanges in actual emissions from affected sources hrough calculations ofthe differences between certain baseline levels and allowable emissions anticipated as a result ofthe revision. 4. The State's demonstration that the national ambient air quality 4. Regulations to allow permits to be combined will enhance X standards, prevention ofsignificant deterioration increments, the current approved program in Virginia. Air Guidance easonable further progress demonstration, and visibility, as Memo No. APG-308: Interpretation of9 VAC 5-80-1695 applicable, are protected ifthe plan is approved and implemented. F - Exemption ofalternative fuels under MajorNSRclarifies that the major NSRprogram is unaffected by proposed SIP revision so that the NAAQS, PSD increments, reasonable further progress demonstration, and visibility are protected. 5. Modeling information required to support the proposed revision, 5. N/A X including input data, output data, models used, ambient monitoring data used, meteorological data used,justification for use ofoffsite data (where used), modes ofmodels used, assumptions, and other information relevant to the determination ofadequacy ofthe modeling analysis. 6. Evidence, where necessary, that emission limitations are based on 6. N/A X continuous emission reduction technology. 7. Evidence that theplan contains emission limitations, work 7. Regulations to allow permits to be combined will better X practice standards and recordkeepinglreportingrequirements, where ensure that majorNSR and minorNSR terms and pecessary, to ensure emission levels. conditions are preserved and betterunderstood bythe permittee, the public, and the regl!lating agency. 8. Compliance/enforcement strategies, including how compliance 8. Regulations to allow permits to be combined will better X**~ill** be determined in practice. ensure that compliance will be determined in practice in that there will bemore effective and efficient issuance of NSR permits. 9. Special economic and technologicaljustifications required by any 9. Economic impact analysis ofall proposed changes X applicable EPA policies. (Ifa policy is not appropriate, explain concludes that benefits are likelyto exceed the costs.**~hy.)** 10. A Section 107 request mustbe accompanied by a maintenance 10. N/A X lPlan demonstrating maintenance to the relevant NAAQS for at least 10 years after redesignation.

# t (