alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 22

                           SEARCH CAPITAL GROUP, INC.

                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

Automobile Credit Holdings., Inc. (first-tier) [in process of dissolution]
        Automobile Credit Acceptance Corp. (second-tier)
        Consumer-Dealer Autocredit Corporation (second-tier)

ELIR Corp. (first-tier)

Newsearch, Inc. (first-tier) [in process of dissolution]

Search Capital Acquisition Corp. (first-tier)

Search Financial Services Company (first-tier)
        Search Financial Services of Florida, Inc. (second-tier)
        Search Financial Services of Georgia, Inc. (second-tier)
        Search Financial Services of Louisiana, Inc. (second-tier)
        Search Financial Services of Oklahoma, Inc. (second-tier)
        Search Financial Services of Puerto Rico, Inc. (second-tier)
        Search Financial Services of Tennessee, Inc. (second-tier)
        Search Financial Services of Texas, Inc. (second-tier)
        Search Mortgage Services of Tennessee, Inc. (second-tier)

Search Funding Corp. (first-tier)

Search Funding II, Inc. (first-tier)

Search Funding III, Inc. (first-tier)

Search Funding IV, Inc. (first-tier)

Search Funding V, Inc. (first-tier)
REGULATORY EVALUATION

Directorate Identifier: 2012-NM-056-AD

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific 

requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of 

transportation?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)
1845.302 Use of Government property on contracts with foreign governments or international organizations. ( a ) NASA contracting officers will recover a fair share of the cost of Government property if such property is used in performing services or manufacturing articles for foreign countries or for international organizations.
#### 2.201 Contract clause.

Insert the clause at 52.202-1, Definitions, in solicitations and contracts that exceed the simplified acquisition threshold.

[69 FR 34228, June 18, 2004]
http://www.dec.ny.gov/enb/20111228_reg2.html#263040002400035 Applicant: TC Ravenswood LLC 110 Turnpike Rd Ste 203 Westborough, MA 01581 Facility: Ravenswood Generating Station 38-54 Vernon Blvd Queens, NY 11101 Application ID: 2-6304-00024/00035 Permit(s) Applied for: Article 19 Air Title V Facility Project is Located: Queens, Queens County Project Description: The Department has prepared a draft permit and has made a tentative determination to issue a Title V Permit Modification for an existing elec tric generating facility. The purpose of the modification is to include as required under Part 249 the Ne w Best Available Retrofit Technology (BART 6NYCRR Part 249) which will be submitted to the USEPA for approval as a revision to the State Implementation Plan (SIP). In accordance with 6NYCRR Part s 621.7(b)(9) and 201-6.4(c), the Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) has the authority to bar issuance of any Title V Facility Permit if it is determined not to be in compliance with applicable requirements of the Clean Air Act or 6NYCRR Part 201. Persons wishing to inspect the s ubject Title V files, including th e application with all relevant supporting materials, the draft permit, and all other materials available to the DEC (the "permitting authority") that are relevant to this permitting decision should contact the DEC representative listed below. The Draft Permit and Permit Review Report may be viewed and printed from the Department web site at: http://www.dec.ny.gov/chemical/32249.html. DEC will evaluate the application and the comments received on it to determine whether to hold a public hearing. Comments and requests for a pub lic hearing should be in writing and addressedto the Department representative list ed below. A copy of the Department's permit hearing procedures is available upon request or on the Department web site at: http://www.dec.ny.gov/permits/6234.html. Availability of Application Documents: Filed application documents, and Department draf t permits where applicable, are available for inspection during normal business hours at the a ddress of the contact person. To ensure timely service at the time of inspecti on, it is recommended that an ap pointment be made with the contact person. State Environmental Quality Re view (SEQR) Determination: Project is not subject to SEQR because it is a Type II action. SEQR Lead Agency: None Designated State Historic Preservation Act (SHPA) Determination: The proposed activity is not subject to review in accordance with SHPA . The permit type is exempt or the activity is being reviewed in accordance with federal historic preservation regulations. Coastal Management: This project is not located in a Coastal Manage ment area and is not subj ect to the Waterfront Revitalization and Coastal Resources Act. Opportunity for Public Comment: Comments on this project must be submitted in writing to the Contact Person no later than Jan 27, 2012

. Contact: Elizabeth A Clarke NYSDEC Region 2 Headquarters 47-40 21st St Long Island City, NY 11101 (718)482-4997 r2dep@gw.dec.state.ny.us
FILED

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUN 11 roi"
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
EASTERN DIVISION THOMAS G. BRUTON

URT
RK, U.S. DISTRICT col
NATASHA BOYLAND, CLERK,

Plaintiff
vs. 12 CV 779

ASSOCIATION HOUSE OF CHICAGO, INC., Judge Kennelly

were Se SS

Defendant. Magistrate Schenkier
MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS

Now comes defendant Association House of Chicago, Inc. and for its motion states as

follows:

1. On March 15, 2012 plaintiff Natasha Boyland filed a Complaint of Employment
Discrimination against defendant alleging that she was discriminated against because
of her race.

2. Plaintiff alleges in paragraph 8 (b) of the complaint that “the United States Equal
Employment Opportunity Commission has issued a Notice of Right to Sue, which was
received by plaintiff on (month) 11 (day) 14 (year) 2011 a copy of which Notice is
attached to this complaint.”

3. Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Section 2000e-5(f)(1) a complaint under Title VII must be
instituted within 90 days of the plaintiffs receipt of the Notice of the Right to Sue
letter.

4. Plaintiffs complaint filed on March 15, 2012 was filed more than 90 days after

plaintiff's November 14, 2011 receipt of the notice of the right to sue.


Wherefore, defendant respectfully requests the court enter an order dismissing plaintiff's

Uw Roa

Uve R. Jerzy, att for Defendant
AssociatiorNdo' hicago, Inc.

complaint.

Law Offices of Uve R. Jerzy P.C.
12120 Graceland Court

Homer Glen, Illinois 60491
Telephone: (708) 301-5500
Facsimile: (708) 301-8187
ARDC # 6190133
204.604 Responsibilities. ( 1 ) The process for reporting contract actions to FPDS should, where possible, be automated by incorporating it into contract writing systems.
( 2 ) Data in FPDS is stored indefinitely and is electronically retrievable. Therefore, the contracting officer may reference the contract action report (CAR) approval date in the associated Government contract file instead of including a paper copy of the electronically submitted CAR in the file. Such reference satisfies contract file documentation requirements of FAR 4.803(a).
( 3 ) By December 15th of each year, the chief acquisition officer of each DoD component required to report its contract actions shall submit to the Principal Director, Defense Pricing, Contracting, and Acquisition Policy, its annual certification and data validation results for the preceding fiscal year in accordance with the DoD Data Improvement Plan requirements at *https://www.acq.osd.mil/asda/dpc/ce/cap/index.html .* The Principal Director, Defense Pricing, Contracting, and Acquisition Policy, will submit a consolidated DoD annual certification to the Office of Management and Budget by January 5th of each year.
[74 FR 37644, July 29, 2009, as amended at 87 FR 15817, Mar. 18, 2022; 89 FR 60831, July 29, 2024]
New Programs Approval

Proposal

The Department seeks to create a process for approval of new gainful employment programs to prevent the establishment of programs that are likely to perform poorly.  

Questions
        - Which new programs should be subject to the approval process?
        - What information should an institution seeking to establish a new program be required to submit to the Department?
        - What criteria should the Department use to ensure that its review of new program applications is meaningful and at the same time can be performed consistently?  

DRAFT for discussion purposes 9.24.13

DRAFT for discussion purposes 9.24.13
#### In the Matter of the Accounting of Patrick Curtin, as Administrator of the Estate of Isabella H. Curtin, Deceased, Respondent. James Herron et al., Appellants.

Motion by respondents to dismiss appeal denied. Nolan, ,P. J., Beldock, Ughetta, Christ and Brennan, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       1,598,744
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,196,943        
<ALLOWANCES>                                   357,136
<INVENTORY>                                  6,600,007
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            12,394,139
<PP&E>                                       3,334,277
<DEPRECIATION>                                 453,884
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              17,661,857
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,328,311
<BONDS>                                      2,922,052
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                 10,119,194
<COMMON>                                       371,335
<OTHER-SE>                                  (2,402,746)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                17,661,857
<SALES>                                     17,581,440
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            17,581,440
<CGS>                                       12,158,111
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               12,158,111
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                25,913
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               248,489
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,541,001
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (11,029,077)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (11,029,077)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (11,696,137)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.34)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
2022 Negotiated Rulemaking 

Institutional and Programmatic Eligibility Committee

January – March 2022

Issue Paper 6: Certification Procedures

Proposed language for section 668.13 (c)(1)(ii)(B)

(ii) An institution’s certification automatically becomes provisional upon notification from the 

Secretary if –

(B) The institution has received the same material finding of noncompliance on a program 

review or audit for more than two consecutive years without demonstrating corrective action; or
###### Editorial Note on Part 1553

#### Editorial Note:

Forms referenced in part 1553 do not appear in the Code of Federal Regulations.

#### 1553.232 Contract financing.
Order Form (01/2005)

United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois

Name of Assigned Judge or

Magistrate Judge

James F. Holderman

Sitting Judge if Other

than Assigned Judge

Sidney I. Schenkier

CASE NUMBER 11 C 9308 DATE 1/10/2013

CASE

TITLE

In Re: Innovatio IP Ventures, LLC, Patent Litigation

DOCKET ENTRY TEXT

Status and motion hearings held. The Court discussed with the parties the items listed on their Joint Agenda filed

on 1/08/13 (doc. # 522). Enter Consent Order Regarding Completion of Certain Defendants’ Document Productions

and Consent Order Regarding Accor North America’s Document Production (attached). For the reasons stated on

the record, plaintiff's motion to compel discovery (doc. #519) is granted in part and denied in part. (For further

details see order (attached)). The matter is set for a status hearing before the magistrate judge on 1/24/13 at 1:30

p.m. If the parties wish the Court to consider any motions at that time, they must file the motions with the

associated joint statement(s) by noon on 1/21/13 and deliver courtesy copies to chambers by 1/22/13 at 10:00 a.m.

If prior to the status hearing, the parties report that their disputes have been resolved, then they are to contact

chambers and the Court will strike the 1/24/13 status hearing.

Notices mailed by Judicial staff.

*Copy to judge/magistrate judge.

00:40 NFPC

00:05 OAR

Courtroom Deputy JJ

11C9308 In Re: Innovatio IP Ventures, LLC, Patent Litigation Page 1 of 1

Case: 1:11-cv-09308 Document #: 527 Filed: 01/10/13 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:18965
#### Rose Dressler et al., Appellants, v. Socony Mobil Oil Co., Inc., et al., Respondents.

Judgment entered April 22, 1964, dismissing the complaint at the close of plaintiffs’ case, unanimously reversed, on the law, and a new trial directed, with $50 costs to abide the event. Defendants’ use of the sidewalk *781was a special use for the ingress and egress of motor vehicles to and from the gasoline station. The evidence establishes questions of fact as to the existence of a dangerous sidewalk condition consequent on said special use. *(Mullins*v. *Siegel-Cooper Co.,*183 N. Y. 129; *Wylie*v. *City of New York,*286 App. Div. 720; *Nickelsburg*v. *City of New York,*263 App. Div. 625; *Joel*v. *Electrical Research Prods.,*94 F. 2d 588.) Concur — Botein, P. J., McNally, Stevens and Steuer, JJ.
S. 931 

One Hundred Fifteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and eighteen 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 4910 Brighton 

Boulevard in Denver, Colorado, as the ‘‘George Sakato Post Office’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. GEORGE SAKATO POST OFFICE. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 4910 Brighton Boulevard in Denver, Colorado, 

shall be known and designated as the ‘‘George Sakato Post Office’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘George Sakato Post Office’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
Exhibit 12.1

BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY and SUBSIDIARIES

COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

(In millions, except ratio amounts)

(Unaudited)



|                                                                                                  |  |      |       |      |   |      
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---- | ----- | ---- | - | -----
|Six Months Ended June 30,                                                                         |  | 2006 |       | 2005
|Earnings:                                                                                         |  |      |       |      |   |      
|Income before income taxes                                                                        |  | $    | 1,662 |      | $ | 1,300
|Add:                                                                                              |  |      |       |      |   |      
|Interest and other fixed charges excluding capitalized interest                                   |  |      | 60    |      |   | 68   
|Estimate of portion of rent under long-term operating leases representative of an interest factor |  |      | 125   |      |   | 102  
|Distributed income of investees accounted for under the equity method                             |  |      | 2     |      |   | 2    
|Amortization of capitalized interest                                                              |  |      | 2     |      |   | 4    
|Less: Undistributed equity in earnings of investments accounted for under the equity method       |  |      | 10    |      |   | 4    
|                                                                                                  |  |      |       |      |   |      
|Total earnings available for fixed charges                                                        |  | $    | 1,841 |      | $ | 1,472
|                                                                                                  |  |      |       |      |   |      
|Fixed charges:                                                                                    |  |      |       |      |   |      
|Interest and fixed charges                                                                        |  | $    | 67    |      | $ | 74   
|Estimate of portion of rent under long-term operating leases representative of an interest factor |  |      | 125   |      |   | 102  
|                                                                                                  |  |      |       |      |   |      
|Total fixed charges                                                                               |  | $    | 192   |      | $ | 176  
|                                                                                                  |  |      |       |      |   |      
|Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                                                                |  |      | 9.59x |      |   | 8.36x
|                                                                                                  |  |      |       |      |   |      



E-2
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 12 (Thursday, January 21, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 6362]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-01256]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[LLNM920000 L13100000.PP0000 212L1109AF]


Proposed Reinstatement of Terminated Oil and Gas Lease NMNM 
119276, New Mexico

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of proposed reinstatement.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Mineral Leasing Act of 1920, as 
amended, EOG Y Resources Inc., et al., timely filed a petition for 
reinstatement of competitive oil and gas lease NMNM 119276 in Lea 
County, New Mexico. The lessee paid the required rentals accruing from 
the date of termination. No lease was issued that affects these lands. 
The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) proposes to reinstate the lease.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Julieann Serrano, Supervisory Land Law 
Examiner, Branch of Adjudication, Bureau of Land Management New Mexico 
State Office, 301 Dinosaur Trail, Santa Fe, NM 87508, (505) 954-2149, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#bfd5ccdacdcdded1d0ffddd3d291d8d0c9"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="dcb6afb9aeaebdb2b39cbeb0b1f2bbb3aa">[email protected]</span></a>. Persons who use a telecommunications device for the 
deaf (TDD) may call the Federal Relay Service (FRS) at 1-800-877-8339 
to contact Ms. Serrano during normal business hours. The FRS is 
available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, to leave a message or 
question. You will receive a reply during normal business hours.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The lessee agrees to new lease terms for 
rentals and royalties of $10 per acre, or fraction thereof, per year, 
and 16\2/3\ percent, respectively. The lessee agrees to additional or 
amended stipulations. The lessee paid the $500 administration fee for 
the reinstatement of the lease and the cost for publishing this notice.
    The lessee met the requirements for reinstatement of the lease per 
Sec. 31(d) and (e) of the Mineral Leasing Act of 1920. The BLM is 
proposing to reinstate the lease, effective the date of termination 
subject to the:
    <bullet> Original terms and conditions of the lease;
    <bullet> Additional and amended stipulations;
    <bullet> Increased rental of $10 per acre;
    <bullet> Increased royalty of 16\2/3\ percent; and
    <bullet> $151 cost of publishing this notice.

    Authority: 43 CFR 3108.2-3.

Julieann Serrano,
Supervisory Land Law Examiner.
[FR Doc. 2021-01256 Filed 1-19-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-FB-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


         We  consent  to the  incorporation  by  reference  in the  Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (No. 33-36004) of Public Storage,  Inc.,  formerly Storage
Equities,  Inc.,  pertaining  to the 1990 Stock  Option Plan,  the  Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (No.  33-55541)  pertaining to the 1994 Stock Option Plan,
the Registration  Statement on Form S-8 (No.  333-13463)  pertaining to the 1996
Stock Option and Incentive  Plan,  the  Registration  Statement on Form S-3 (No.
333-41123) and in the related prospectus and Registration  Statement on Form S-4
(No.  33-64971) and in the related  prospectus of our report dated  February 23,
1998 with respect to the  consolidated  financial  statements  and  schedules of
Public  Storage,  Inc.  included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for 1997 filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission.



                                                          ERNST & YOUNG L L P
March 27, 1998
Los Angeles, California

                                   Exhibit-3