alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### Pesticides Detected in Urban Streams During Rainstorms and Relations to Retail Sales of Pesticides in King County, Washington

By: Frank D. VossSandra S. EmbreyJames C. EbbertDale L. DavisAnnette M. FrahmGeorge H. Perry

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/fs09799

#### Links

- More information:  **Publisher Index Page**                            (html)
-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
### §4804. Notice and hearing

During the period beginning on January 1, 1986, and ending 30 days after receipt of a proposal for an initial order submitted by any person affected by this chapter, the Secretary shall—

(1) publish such proposed order; and

(2) give due notice of and opportunity for public comment on such proposed order.

(Pub. L. 99–198, title XVI, §1615, Dec. 23, 1985, 99 Stat. 1609.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Jan. 1, 1986, see section 1631 of Pub. L. 99–198, set out as a note under section 4801 of this title.
#### 2015.300 Scope of subpart.

This subpart applies to all contracts awarded on a competitive basis in accordance with FAR part 15. This subpart does not apply to contracts awarded on a non-competitive basis to the Small Business Administration under Section 8(a) of the Small Business Act.
EXHIBIT
23.1

























CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM











We have
issued our report dated March 22, 2010, accompanying the consolidated financial
statements included in the Annual Report of Access Pharmaceuticals, Inc. on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009. We hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statements of
Access Pharmaceuticals, Inc. on Form S-1 (File Nos. 333-162687, 333-149633,
333-125349, and 333-135734), Form S-4 (File Nos. 333-155885 and 333-143587), and
Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-45646, 333-75136, 333-125796, and
333-114269).




/s/
Whitley Penn LLP




Dallas,
Texas


March 22,
2010
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Herbert S. Siegal, on Behalf of Arnold Schildhaus, v. Edward Dros, as Warden.

— Motion for an order requiring relator to accept service of the notice of appeal denied. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, Yalente, McNally and Bastow, JJ.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 5.0.3

Eastern Division

Bubble Gum Productions, LLC

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:12−cv−00595

Honorable Joan H. Lefkow

Does 1−37

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Tuesday, May 22, 2012:

 MINUTE entry before Honorable Joan H. Lefkow:Status hearing held on

5/22/2012 and continued to 7/10/2012 at 08:30 AM.Mailed notice(mad, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:12-cv-00595 Document #: 22 Filed: 05/22/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:139
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Simon Hartzog, Appellant.

Judgment of conviction affirmed. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, McNally and Steuer, JJ.; Stevens, J., dissents in the following memorandum: Defendant is charged with receiving money in aiding the game of policy, in violation of section 974 of the Penal Law. The evidence consisted of testimony by the arresting officer that he observed several persons approach defendant on the sidewalk outside of premises 324 Lenox Avenue, converse with him and hand him money. The officer did not hear the conversation. Thereafter defendant entered a beauty parlor at the premises, and the witness testified he overheard an unknown female say “give me 102 for a nickel.” He did not observe any money pass between them. No policy slips were found on the defendant. The testimony concerning occurrences on the sidewalk may be disregarded for, on the evidence, no crime was committed there. While it is a permissible, and perhaps a reasonable inference that the defendant did accept a bet, the evidence falls short of proving beyond a reasonable doubt his guilt of the crime charged. I therefore dissent and vote to reverse the judgment and dismiss the information.
#### DAVIS v. N.C. DEPT. OF HUMAN RESOURCES

No. 314A97

Case below: 126 N.C.App. 383

Petition by petitioner (Haywood Davis) for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 and Appellate Rule 16(b) as to issues in addition to those presented as the basis for the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals is deemed a petition for writ of certiorari and is allowed 4 September 1997. Motion by respondant (NCDHR) to dismiss petitioner’s petition for discretionary review as to additional issues denied 4 September 1997.
<PAGE>


                             CERTIFICATE OF TRUST OF
                               TITAN CAPITAL TRUST


         THIS Certificate of Trust of Titan Capital Trust (the "Trust") is being
duly executed and filed on behalf of the Trust by the undersigned, as trustees,
to form a business trust under the Delaware Business Trust Act (12 DEL. C.
Section 3801 ET SEQ.) (the "Act").

         1. NAME. The name of the business trust formed hereby is Titan Capital
Trust.

         2. DELAWARE TRUSTEE. The name and business address of the trustee of
the Trust in the State of Delaware is WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY, RODNEY SQUARE
NORTH, 1100 NORTH MARKET STREET, WILMINGTON, DELAWARE 19890-0001, ATTENTION:
CORPORATE TRUST ADMINISTRATION.

         3. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Certificate of Trust will be effective upon
filing.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have duly executed this Certificate
of Trust in accordance with Section 3811(a)(1) of the Act.


                                  WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY, as Delaware Trustee


                                  By:
                                     -----------------------------------
                                  Name:
                                  Title:

                                  WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY, as Property Trustee


                                  By:
                                     -----------------------------------
                                  Name:
                                  Title:


                                  ----------------------------------
                                  Deanna Hom Petersen, as Administrative Trustee


                                  ----------------------------------
                                  Ray Guillaume, as Administrative Trustee
Dismissed and Me morandum Opinion filed October 4 , 2016

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 16

- 00689

- CV

KENNETH W. ISAAC , Appellant

V.
CONSTANCE BURNSIDE , Appellee

On Appeal from Probate Court No

. 2 Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 419,942

- 401

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
This is an attempted appeal from an order signed August 2, 2016, denying appellant’s motion for summary judgment

. Generally, appeals may be taken only from final judgments. Lehmann v. Har Con Corp. , 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001). When orders do not dispose of all pending parties and claims, the orders remain interlocutory and unappealable until final judgment is ente red unless a statutory exception applies. Bally Total Fitness Corp. v. Jackson , 53 S.W.3d 352, 352 (Tex. 2001); Jack B. Anglin Co., Inc. v. Tipps , 842 S.W.2d 266, 272 (Tex.2

1992) (orig. proceeding)

. The August 2, 2016 order does not dispose of all pending parties and claims and is therefore interlocutory. After filing a notice of interlocutory appeal in this case, appellant filed a petition in this court for permission to appeal the August 2, 2016 order. See Tex. R. App. P. 28.3(a). The petition was dockete d into appeal number 14

- 16

- 00728

- CV. That appeal is pending.

On September 26, 2016 , notification was transmitted to the parties of this court’s intention to dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction unless appellant filed a response demonstrating ground s for continuing the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a). Appellant ’s response acknowledges that the August 2, 2016 order is being appealed in appeal number 14

- 16

- 00728

- CV and asks that this appeal be “administratively closed.” The appropriate disposition of an appeal over which we lack jurisdiction is dismissal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.1(b). Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED

.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jamison, McCally, and Wise

.
1846.670-4 Multiple shipments. ( a ) If the “shipped to,” “marked for,” “shipped from,” “CQA,” and “acceptance” data are the same for more than one shipment made on the same day under the same contract in a single car, truck, or other vehicle, one MIRR shall be prepared to cover all such shipments.
( b ) If the volume of the shipments precludes the use of a single car, truck, or other vehicle, a separate MIRR shall be provided for each vehicle.
[62 FR 14024, Mar. 25, 1997, as amended at 69 FR 44610, July 27, 2004]
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-14-00011-CV

VICKI MCPHERSON AND TIMOTHY MCPHERSON,

Appellant

v.

TEXAS FOREST SERVICE,

Appellee

From the 85th District Court

Brazos County, Texas

Trial Court No. 13-001728-CV-85

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Vicki McPherson and Timothy McPherson appealed the trial court’s order 

granting Texas Forest Service’s plea to the jurisdiction. The appeal was referred to 

mediation on July 31, 2014. The Court was informed by the mediator by letter dated 

October 31, 2014 that the parties have settled the case. As of this date, we have not 

received any disposition documents or requests by the parties.

By letter dated December 5, 2014, the Clerk of this Court notified the McPhersons 

that they must provide a status report to the Court within 14 days of the date of the 
McPherson v. Texas Forest Service Page 2

letter as to a specific date when this proceeding would be disposed, or the appeal would 

be dismissed for want of prosecution. Fourteen days have passed and no status report 

has been provided. 

This appeal is dismissed. TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b).

TOM GRAY

Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Appeal dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed January 15, 2015

[CV06]
No. 7943.

#### Hoffhine *v.*Goldsberry et al.

(Decided January 5, 1904.)

Error *to*Circuit Court of Ross county.

*Mr. John 0. EntreMn; Mr. John P. Phillips*and *Mr. Lyle 8. Evans,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. John W. Goldsberry,*for defendants in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Btjrket, C. J., Davis, Shatjck and • Crew, JJ., •concur.
Fiscal Year 2015 Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies - DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

FY 2015 Title I

LEA ID District Allocation*

1100030 District of Columbia Public Schools 42,820,175

1199999 PART D SUBPART 2 0

* Actual amounts received by LEAs will be smaller than shown here due to State-level adjustments to Federal Title I allocations. States adjust

 allocations, for example, to reflect LEA boundary changes or the creation of new LEAs, including charter school LEAs, that are not accounted

 for in the statutory calculations. States also are permitted to reserve, for administration, up to 1 percent of the allocations they would receive

 if $14 billion were appropriated and generally must reserve 4 percent in fiscal year 2015 for school improvement activities. These 

 adjustments will reduce the actual amounts available.
#### Fairview Hardware, Inc., Appellant, v. David Strausman et al., Copartners Doing Business as Strausman Construction Co., Respondents.

In an action by plaintiff, the lessee of a store in a shopping center, against defendants, the lessors, to recover damages for the breach of their covenant not to lease any other store in the shopping center for the sale of hardware, wallpaper and paints, plaintiff appeals from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, rendered June 2, 1960, after a nonjury trial, as awards it nominal damages of six cents. Judgment insofar as appealed from modified on the law and the facts by increasing the award of damages from six cents to $720. As so modified, the judgment is affirmed, with costs to plaintiff. Findings of fact inconsistent herewith are reversed, and new findings are made as indicated herein. In our opinion, the proof warrants a finding that defendants’ breach of the covenant caused a decrease of $72 a year in the rental value of plaintiff’s store, or a total decrease of $720 over the 10-year term of plaintiff’s lease. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Kleinfeld, Christ and Pette, JJ., concur.
Case: 1:11-cv-09084 Document #: 4 Filed: 12/22/11 Page 1 of 25 PageID #:17
Case: 1:11-cv-09084 Document #: 4 Filed: 12/22/11 Page 2 of 25 PageID #:18
Case: 1:11-cv-09084 Document #: 4 Filed: 12/22/11 Page 3 of 25 PageID #:19
Case: 1:11-cv-09084 Document #: 4 Filed: 12/22/11 Page 4 of 25 PageID #:20
Case: 1:11-cv-09084 Document #: 4 Filed: 12/22/11 Page 5 of 25 PageID #:21
Case: 1:11-cv-09084 Document #: 4 Filed: 12/22/11 Page 6 of 25 PageID #:22
Case: 1:11-cv-09084 Document #: 4 Filed: 12/22/11 Page 7 of 25 PageID #:23
Case: 1:11-cv-09084 Document #: 4 Filed: 12/22/11 Page 8 of 25 PageID #:24
Case: 1:11-cv-09084 Document #: 4 Filed: 12/22/11 Page 9 of 25 PageID #:25
Case: 1:11-cv-09084 Document #: 4 Filed: 12/22/11 Page 10 of 25 PageID #:26
Case: 1:11-cv-09084 Document #: 4 Filed: 12/22/11 Page 11 of 25 PageID #:27
Case: 1:11-cv-09084 Document #: 4 Filed: 12/22/11 Page 12 of 25 PageID #:28
Case: 1:11-cv-09084 Document #: 4 Filed: 12/22/11 Page 13 of 25 PageID #:29
Case: 1:11-cv-09084 Document #: 4 Filed: 12/22/11 Page 14 of 25 PageID #:30
Case: 1:11-cv-09084 Document #: 4 Filed: 12/22/11 Page 15 of 25 PageID #:31
Case: 1:11-cv-09084 Document #: 4 Filed: 12/22/11 Page 16 of 25 PageID #:32
Case: 1:11-cv-09084 Document #: 4 Filed: 12/22/11 Page 17 of 25 PageID #:33
Case: 1:11-cv-09084 Document #: 4 Filed: 12/22/11 Page 18 of 25 PageID #:34
Case: 1:11-cv-09084 Document #: 4 Filed: 12/22/11 Page 19 of 25 PageID #:35
Case: 1:11-cv-09084 Document #: 4 Filed: 12/22/11 Page 20 of 25 PageID #:36
Case: 1:11-cv-09084 Document #: 4 Filed: 12/22/11 Page 21 of 25 PageID #:37
Case: 1:11-cv-09084 Document #: 4 Filed: 12/22/11 Page 22 of 25 PageID #:38
Case: 1:11-cv-09084 Document #: 4 Filed: 12/22/11 Page 23 of 25 PageID #:39
Case: 1:11-cv-09084 Document #: 4 Filed: 12/22/11 Page 24 of 25 PageID #:40
Case: 1:11-cv-09084 Document #: 4 Filed: 12/22/11 Page 25 of 25 PageID #:41
| **Signatures**                              |   | **Title**                                   |   | **Date**                     |
|---------------------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------|--------|------------------------------|
|                                        |   |                                        |   |                         |
| /s/                GEOFFREY P. TALBOT       |   | Chairman,                CEO, President and |   | July                14, 2008 |
| GEOFFREY                P. TALBOT           |   | Chief                Financial Officer      |   |                         |
|                                        |   |                                        |   |                         |
| /s/                PETER J. UPFOLD          |   | Vice                Chairman,               |   | July                14, 2008 |
| PETER                J. UPFOLD              |   | CTO                and Treasurer/Secretary  |   |                         |
|                                        |   |                                        |   |                         |
| /s/                LEONARD SILVERMAN, Ph.D. |   | Director                                    |   | July                14, 2008 |
| LEONARD                SILVERMAN, Ph.D.     |   |                                        |   |                         |
|                                        |   |                                        |   |                         |
| /s/                ROBERT B. FIELDS         |   | Director                                    |   | July                14, 2008 |
| ROBERT                B. FIELDS             |   |                                        |   |                         |

----
DB1/ 70438562.1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

JAMES BRAND, Individually, and on

Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated,

Plaintiffs,

v.

COMCAST CORPORATION and

COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS

MANAGEMENT, LLC

Defendant.

Case No. 1:12-cv-01122

Hon. Young B. Kim

APPENDIX OF EXHIBITS TO DEFENDANTS’ MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO

PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO CONDITIONALLY CERTIFY A COLLECTIVE ACTION

AND FACILITATE NOTICE PURSUANT TO 29 U.S.C. § 216(b)

Exhibit A Audre H. Pierce Declaration

Exhibit 1 Cortland Collective Bargaining Agreement Excerpt

Exhibit 2 Chicago West Area Collective Bargaining Agreement Excerpt

Exhibit 3 “Getting Paid for Your Work” PowerPoint

Exhibit 4 Employee Self-Service (ESS) Records of Completion

Exhibit 5 2012 Employee Handbook Excerpt

Exhibit 6 Employee Handbook Acknowledgements

Exhibit B Declaration of Patrick Michael Berry, Sr.

Exhibit C Declaration of Adam Charles Braden

Exhibit D Declaration of Christopher Campbell

Exhibit E Declaration of Antonio Cavazos

Case: 1:12-cv-01122 Document #: 42 Filed: 07/16/12 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:213
DB1/ 70438562.1

2

Exhibit F Declaration of Aaron Cummings

Exhibit G Declaration of Terry Hibler

Exhibit H Declaration of Joseph Kerpe

Exhibit I Declaration of Hilal Khanqashi

Exhibit J Declaration of Timothy Joe Larkins

Exhibit K Declaration of Grovell D. Latimer

Exhibit L Declaration of Stephen Gregory Mason

Exhibit M Declaration of Jesse McCune

Exhibit N Declaration of John Nussbaum

Exhibit O Declaration of Craig Ohmart

Exhibit P Declaration of Joseph Parmer

Exhibit Q Declaration of Mike Pelletier

Exhibit R Declaration of Chad Reith

Exhibit S Declaration of Brian David Thrasher

Exhibit T Declaration of Daniel R. Warren

Exhibit U Excerpts from Kevin Jackson Deposition, June 6, 2012, Brand et al. v. Comcast

Corp., No. 11-cv-8474 (N.D. Ill.)

Exhibit V Justiniano-Revollo v. Shorty’s IV, Inc., No. 03-23077-PCH (S.D. Fla. Mar. 17,

2004)

Exhibit W Shannon Jordan EEOC Charge

Exhibit X Defendants’ Proposed Notice

Case: 1:12-cv-01122 Document #: 42 Filed: 07/16/12 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:214
DB1/ 70438562.1

3

DATED: July 16, 2012 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Gregory P. Abrams

SARI M. ALAMUDDIN

GREGORY P. ABRAMS

ALLISON N. POWERS

MORGAN LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP

77 West Wacker Drive, 5th Floor

Chicago, IL 60601-5094

Tel: (312) 324-1000

Fax: (312) 324-1001

salamuddin@morganlewis.com

gabrams@morganlewis.com

apowers@morganlewis.com

MICHAEL L. BANKS (admitted pro hac vice)

MORGAN LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP

1701 Market Street

PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103

Tel: (215) 963-5387

Fax: (215) 963-5001

mbanks@morganlewis.com

Case: 1:12-cv-01122 Document #: 42 Filed: 07/16/12 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:215
19.202-4 Solicitation. The contracting officer shall encourage maximum response to solicitations by small business, veteran-owned small business, service-disabled veteran-owned small business, HUBZone small business, small disadvantaged business, and women-owned small business concerns by taking the following actions: ( a ) Allow the maximum amount of time practicable for the submission of offers.
( b ) Furnish specifications, plans, and drawings with solicitations, or furnish information as to where they may be obtained or examined.
( c ) Provide to any small business concern, upon its request, a copy of solicitations with respect to any contract to be let, the name and telephone number of an agency contact to answer questions related to such prospective contract and adequate citations to each major Federal law or agency rule with which such business concern must comply in performing such contract other than laws or agency rules with which the small business must comply when doing business with other than the Government.
[48 FR 42240, Sept. 19, 1983, as amended at 63 FR 70268, Dec. 18, 1998; 65 FR 60544, Oct. 11, 2000; 68 FR 43856, July 24, 2003; 85 FR 11759, Feb. 27, 2020]
1401.301 Policy. ( a ) ( 1 ) Subject to the authorities in paragraph (c) of this section, the Department issues acquisition regulations which implement or supplement the FAR under the DIAR System. The regulation, as part of the FAR system, is issued in accordance with the policy in FAR 1.301(a)(1).
( 2 ) Subject to the authorities in paragraph (c) of this section, the Department also issues internal guidance and instructions under the DIAR System in accordance with the policy in FAR 1.301(a)(2).
( b ) Public participation in promulgating acquisition regulations, which are published in the Federal Register, shall follow the Department's rulemaking procedures prescribed in Part 318, Chapter 5 of the Departmental Manual (318 DM 5) and the procedures in FAR Subpart 1.5.
( c ) Regulations and internal guidance under the DIAR System are issued pursuant to the authority of the Secretary of the Interior under 5 U.S.C. 301 and 40 U.S.C. 486(c). This authority has been delegated to the Assistant Secretary—Policy, Management and Budget under Part 209, Chapter 4.1A of the Departmental Manual (209 DM 4.1A).
#### 16.602 Labor-hour contracts.

*Description.* A labor-hour contract is a variation of the time-and-materials contract, differing only in that materials are not supplied by the contractor. See 12.207(b), 16.601(c), and 16.601(d) for application and limitations, for time-and-materials contracts that also apply to labor-hour contracts. See 12.207(b) for the use of labor-hour contracts for certain commercial services.

[71 FR 74677, Dec. 12, 2006]