alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
US_ACTIVE-108246632.1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS, EASTERN DIVISION

SOURCEBOOKS, INC.,

Plaintiff,

v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:11-CV-07738

The Honorable Amy J. St. Eve

ANITA CLENNEY,

Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff,

v.

REED SMITH LLP and

DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP,

Third-Party Defendants.

NOTICE OF MOTION

TO: All Counsel of Record as Reflected in the Court’s CM/ECF System for this case

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on Wednesday January 11, 2012 at 8:30 a.m., or as soon 

thereafter as counsel may be heard, Reed Smith LLP will appear before the Honorable Judge 

Amy J. St. Eve, or any judge sitting in her stead, in Courtroom 1241 of the United States District 

Court, 219 South Dearborn, Chicago, Illinois, and shall then and there present the 

contemporaneously filed Motion for Short Extension of Time to File Memorandum of Law in 

Support of Motion to Dismiss Count III of Defendant’s Counterclaims and Defendant’s ThirdParty Complaint. 

Dated: January 6, 2011 REED SMITH LLP 

By: /s/ Douglas A. Albritton 

One of its attorneys

Douglas Alan Albritton (ARDC# 6228734)

REED SMITH LLP

10 South Wacker Drive, 40th Floor 

Chicago, Illinois 60606-7507

Phone (312) 207-6550

Fax (312) 207-6400

Case: 1:11-cv-07738 Document #: 26 Filed: 01/06/12 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:167
- 2 -

Case: 1:11-cv-07738 Document #: 26 Filed: 01/06/12 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:168
- 3 -

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned, an attorney, hereby certifies that he served the foregoing

NOTICE OF MOTION FOR MOTION FOR SHORT EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE 

MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS COUNT III OF 

DEFENDANT’S COUNTERCLAIMS AND DEFENDANT’S THIRD-PARTY COMPLAINT

by means of the Court’s CM/ECF System, which causes a true and correct copy of the same to 

be served electronically on all CM/ECF registered counsel of record, on January 6, 2012. 

/s/ Douglas A. Albritton

Douglas A. Albritton

Case: 1:11-cv-07738 Document #: 26 Filed: 01/06/12 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:169
#### 1436.571 Additive and deductive items.

If it appears that funds available for a construction project may be insufficient for all the desired features, the CO may provide in the solicitation for a base bid item covering the work as specified and for one or more additive or deductive bid items which add or omit specified features of the work in a stated order of priority. Such solicitations shall include a provision substantially as set forth in 1452.236-71, and the low bidder and the bid items to be awarded shall be determined as provided in the provision.
§ 770.45 Entry procedures. ( a ) Any individual person or group of persons desiring the advance consent of the Commanding Officer, Naval Submarine Base New London, or his authorized representative shall, in writing, submit a request to the Commanding Officer, Naval Submarine Base New London, at the following address: Commanding Officer (Attn: Security Officer), Box 38, Naval Submarine Base New London, Groton, CT 06349.
( b ) Each request for entry will be considered on an individual basis weighing the operational, security, and safety requirements of Naval Submarine Base New London with the purpose, size of party, duration of visit, destination, and military resources which would be required by the granting of the request.
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Venture Catalyst Incorporated (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the year ending June 30, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Kevin McIntosh, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



By:

/s/    KEVIN
MCINTOSHKevin McIntosh Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer




Dated: September 21, 2004
<PAGE>
                                                                   Exhibit 10.45


                                 Heartland Technology, Inc.
                                 547 West Jackson Boulevard
                                 Chicago, Illinois 60661

[date]

Mr. Edwin Jacobson
161 East Chicago Avenue
Apartment 43H
Chicago, Illinois 60611

          Re:  Third Amendment to Employment Agreement

Dear Mr. Jacobson:

          We are writing with respect to your employment by Heartland
Technology, Inc., formerly known as Milwaukee Land Company (the "Company"), as
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, pursuant to an Employment
Agreement, dated June 29, 1993 and amended August 7, 1996 and June 1, 1997 (as
so amended, the "Employment Agreement"), the terms of which expire on May 30,
2002.  The Company acknowledges and recognizes the value of your experience and
abilities to the Company and desires to continue to retain and make secure for
itself such experience and abilities through May 30, 2005.

          Therefore, subject to your signing and returning to the Company,
c/o Richard P. Brandstatter, a duplicate original of this letter, effective as
of the date hereof, Section 1 and Section 7(d)(i) of the Employment Agreement
are hereby amended to delete the date "May 30, 2002" and substitute therefor the
date "May 30, 2005." Except as amended by this letter, the Employment Agreement
remains in full force and effect in accordance with its terms.

          If the foregoing is satisfactory, please indicate your agreement by
signing and returning to the Company the enclosed copy of this letter whereupon
this will constitute our agreement on the subject.

                                    HEARTLAND TECHNOLOGY, INC.



                                    By:
                                       -----------------------------------

                                    Its:
                                        ----------------------------------


ACCEPTED AND AGREED TO:


-----------------------------
Edwin Jacobson
M. P. No. 75-157.

#### Richard St. Pierre *v.*James W. Mullen, *Warden.*

Respondent is directed to file his answer to the petition for habeas corpus and therein to *show cause,*if any he has, why the writ should not issue as prayed, said answer *959to be made in compliance with the provisions of Rule 14. The motion of petitioner to engage in oral argument is denied without prejudice to his right to raise this motion at a later date.

*William F. Reilly,*Public Defender, *Peter DiBiase,*Asst. Public Defender, for petitioner. *Julius C. Michaelson,*Attorney General, for respondent.
19.1401 General. ( a ) The Veterans Benefit Act of 2003 (15 U.S.C. 657f) created the procurement program for small business concerns owned and controlled by service-disabled veterans (commonly referred to as the “Service-Disabled Veteran-owned Small Business (SDVOSB) Program”).
( b ) The purpose of the SDVOSB Program is to provide Federal contracting assistance to service-disabled veteran-owned small business concerns.
[69 FR 25278, May 5, 2004, as amended at 89 FR 13957, Feb. 23, 2024]
English Learner (EL) Students Who Are Hispanic/Latino

This fact sheet uses data from the 2013 American Community Survey (ACS), and applies the following definitions:

• An “English learner” student:

o is 5 to 18 years old,

o attends school,

o lives in a home where English is not the primary language spoken, and

o reports speaking English “well,” “not very well,” or “not at all.”

• The 2013 ACS defines individuals who are Hispanic or Latino as those whose origin or ancestry is Mexican, Mexican American,

Chicano, Puerto Rican, Cuban, from other Spanish-speaking countries of the Caribbean or Central or South America, or from Spain.

People who identify their origin as Hispanic or Latino may be of any race.

These definitions represent the respondent’s perceptions of his or her own English-speaking ability and ethnicity (Gambino, et al., 2014). The 

definitions may not correspond with those used by State Education Agencies and Local Education Agencies for reporting purposes. 

OCTOBER 2015

1 of 2

Percentage of EL Students Who Are Hispanic/Latino, by State, Including DC: 2013

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2013. Estimates generated by NCELA using Census DataFerrett.

Fact

Eighty-one 

percent of EL 

students in 

Arizona, 

Delaware, Kansas, 

New Mexico, and

Texas are 

Hispanic/Latino. 
Fact

Hispanic/Latino ethnicities with the largest percentages 

of EL students include:

• Honduran 17.3%

• Salvadoran 17.1%

• Guatemalan 16.7%

• Paraguayan 16.7%a

• Dominican 16.6%

• Venezuelan 15.6%

• Mexican 13.2%

• Ecuadoran 12.6%

a EL students of Paraguayan ethnicity are a very small number, with under 1,000 reported in the 2013 ACS.

Note: Data are for both EL students born in the US and born in another country. 

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2013. Estimates generated by NCELA using Census DataFerrett. 

Citizenship Status of EL Students Who Are Hispanic/Latino: 2013

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2013. Estimates generated by NCELA using Census DataFerrett.

Fact

Seventy-seven percent of EL students who are Hispanic/Latino were born in the United States. 

Reference Cited: Gambino, Christine P., Yesenia D. Acosta, and Elizabeth M. Grieco. English-Speaking Ability of the Foreign-Born Population in the 

United States: 2012. American Community Survey Reports, ACS-26. U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DC. 2014.

OCTOBER 2015
July 28, 2016 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Management System 1200 

New Jersey Ave., SE Washington DC 20590 

RE: Response to Request for Information to FAA-2015-7175, Description of Aircraft 

Make, Model, Maximum Weight Including Payload and Power Source. 

aircraft make is a DJI Science and Technology Co., Ltd 

model is a Phantom II Vision Plus 

maximum payload is 1350g or 3 lbs. 

type of aircraft is rotorcraft with 4 rotary propellers for lift 

powersource is a 5200mAh Li-Po Battery 

I understand that that this information is necessary for the Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA) to process the petition and I hope this is all of the information 

necessary to complete the request. Thank you and I look forward to hearing back from 

the Administration. 

Brandon Shane Rasch
#### 1201.404 Class deviations.

The SPE may authorize and approve class deviations from the FAR and TAR, unless FAR 1.405(e) applies.
Case: 1:12-cv-00860 Document #: 1-2 Filed: 02/07/12 Page 1 of 36 PageID #:78
Case: 1:12-cv-00860 Document #: 1-2 Filed: 02/07/12 Page 2 of 36 PageID #:79
Case: 1:12-cv-00860 Document #: 1-2 Filed: 02/07/12 Page 3 of 36 PageID #:80
Case: 1:12-cv-00860 Document #: 1-2 Filed: 02/07/12 Page 4 of 36 PageID #:81
Case: 1:12-cv-00860 Document #: 1-2 Filed: 02/07/12 Page 5 of 36 PageID #:82
Case: 1:12-cv-00860 Document #: 1-2 Filed: 02/07/12 Page 6 of 36 PageID #:83
Case: 1:12-cv-00860 Document #: 1-2 Filed: 02/07/12 Page 7 of 36 PageID #:84
Case: 1:12-cv-00860 Document #: 1-2 Filed: 02/07/12 Page 8 of 36 PageID #:85
Case: 1:12-cv-00860 Document #: 1-2 Filed: 02/07/12 Page 9 of 36 PageID #:86
Case: 1:12-cv-00860 Document #: 1-2 Filed: 02/07/12 Page 10 of 36 PageID #:87
Case: 1:12-cv-00860 Document #: 1-2 Filed: 02/07/12 Page 11 of 36 PageID #:88
Case: 1:12-cv-00860 Document #: 1-2 Filed: 02/07/12 Page 12 of 36 PageID #:89
Case: 1:12-cv-00860 Document #: 1-2 Filed: 02/07/12 Page 13 of 36 PageID #:90
Case: 1:12-cv-00860 Document #: 1-2 Filed: 02/07/12 Page 14 of 36 PageID #:91
Case: 1:12-cv-00860 Document #: 1-2 Filed: 02/07/12 Page 15 of 36 PageID #:92
Case: 1:12-cv-00860 Document #: 1-2 Filed: 02/07/12 Page 16 of 36 PageID #:93
Case: 1:12-cv-00860 Document #: 1-2 Filed: 02/07/12 Page 17 of 36 PageID #:94
Case: 1:12-cv-00860 Document #: 1-2 Filed: 02/07/12 Page 18 of 36 PageID #:95
Case: 1:12-cv-00860 Document #: 1-2 Filed: 02/07/12 Page 19 of 36 PageID #:96
Case: 1:12-cv-00860 Document #: 1-2 Filed: 02/07/12 Page 20 of 36 PageID #:97
Case: 1:12-cv-00860 Document #: 1-2 Filed: 02/07/12 Page 21 of 36 PageID #:98
Case: 1:12-cv-00860 Document #: 1-2 Filed: 02/07/12 Page 22 of 36 PageID #:99
Case: 1:12-cv-00860 Document #: 1-2 Filed: 02/07/12 Page 23 of 36 PageID #:100
Case: 1:12-cv-00860 Document #: 1-2 Filed: 02/07/12 Page 24 of 36 PageID #:101
Case: 1:12-cv-00860 Document #: 1-2 Filed: 02/07/12 Page 25 of 36 PageID #:102
Case: 1:12-cv-00860 Document #: 1-2 Filed: 02/07/12 Page 26 of 36 PageID #:103
Case: 1:12-cv-00860 Document #: 1-2 Filed: 02/07/12 Page 27 of 36 PageID #:104
Case: 1:12-cv-00860 Document #: 1-2 Filed: 02/07/12 Page 28 of 36 PageID #:105
Case: 1:12-cv-00860 Document #: 1-2 Filed: 02/07/12 Page 29 of 36 PageID #:106
Case: 1:12-cv-00860 Document #: 1-2 Filed: 02/07/12 Page 30 of 36 PageID #:107
Case: 1:12-cv-00860 Document #: 1-2 Filed: 02/07/12 Page 31 of 36 PageID #:108
Case: 1:12-cv-00860 Document #: 1-2 Filed: 02/07/12 Page 32 of 36 PageID #:109
Case: 1:12-cv-00860 Document #: 1-2 Filed: 02/07/12 Page 33 of 36 PageID #:110
Case: 1:12-cv-00860 Document #: 1-2 Filed: 02/07/12 Page 34 of 36 PageID #:111
Case: 1:12-cv-00860 Document #: 1-2 Filed: 02/07/12 Page 35 of 36 PageID #:112
Case: 1:12-cv-00860 Document #: 1-2 Filed: 02/07/12 Page 36 of 36 PageID #:113
#### 13.404 Contract clause.

The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 52.213-1, Fast Payment Procedure, in solicitations and contracts when the conditions in 13.402 are applicable and it is intended that the fast payment procedure be used in the contract (in the case of BPAs, the contracting officer may elect to insert the clause either in the BPA or in orders under the BPA).
#### 1602.000-70 Scope of part.

This part defines words and terms commonly used in this regulation.
#### In the Matter of the Accounting of Jacqueline Seligmann, as Ancillary Administratrix, C. T. A. of the Estate of Ella J. Seligmann, Deceased, Appellant. Francois-Gerard Seligmann, Respondent.

Motion for leave to reargue or for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied, with $10 costs. Concur — Rabin, J. P., Valente, McNally and Bergan, JJ.
Gainful Employment Negotiated Rulemaking Session 2: Transition Period for DTE 

• Typically, DTE calculations for a program will be made using the most currently available yearly earnings and annual loan 

payments of students who completed the program 3 years and 4 years prior to the year for which the calculation is made 

(the "2YP cohort"). For example, DTE rates for the 2014-2015 award year would be calculated using the 2014 earnings and annual loan 

payment of students who completed a particular program in award years 2010-11 and 2011-12. 

• In the first four years that DTE rates are calculated under the rule (award years 2014-15, 2015-16, 2016-17, and 2017-18), if a program 

would be failing or in the zone based on the typical approach to calculating DTE rates described above, transitional DTE rates would be 

calculated using the most currently available yearly earnings for the 2 YP cohort and the annual loan payments of students who 

completed the program in the most recently completed award year (earnings and debt are decoupled). Transitional rates will be used 

to assess the program if they are lower than what the rates would be under the normal calculation. This will allow programs that 

promptly lower tuition and fees to realize the benefit of their changes. 

• After the four year transition period, the calculation would revert to the normal approach that uses the outcomes of the 2 YP cohort for 

both earnings and annual loan payment. 

2015-16 

2018 

2014-15 & 

2015-16 

transition period ~ 

Dr<:~ft for discussion purposes 11.18.13 

2015-16 & 2016-17 & 2017-18 & 

2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 

2019 2020 2021 

2015-16 & 2016-17 & 2017-18 & 

2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 

revert to 2 YP cohort for both earnings 

and debt after first 4yrs 

. '---- ·-·- ----~"-- -_, . ---------------
#### In the Matter of George H. Hamilton, an Attorney, Respondent. Bar Association of Nassau County, N. Y., Inc., Petitioner.

Motion by petitioner to confirm Official Referee’s report finding respondent guilty of the charges and recommending that he be suspended for one year. Motion granted and report confirmed, except as to the degree of discipline recommended. In our opinion, the respondent’s misconduct requires that he be suspended for a period for 2 years. Accordingly, respondent is suspended from the practice of law for 2 years, commencing 30 days after entry of the order thereon. Beldock, P. J., Brennan, Hill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
#### 1615.7001 Audit and records.

The Contracting officer will modify 52.215-2 in all FEHB Program experience-rated contracts by amending paragraph (g) of that section to replace the words “exceed the simplified acquisition threshold” with “equals or exceeds $550,000.” This amount shall be adjusted by the same amount and at the same time as any change to the threshold for application of the Truth in Negotiations Act pursuant to 41 U.S.C. 254b(a)(7).

[70 FR 31381, June 1, 2005]
14.405 Minor informalities or irregularities in bids. A minor informality or irregularity is one that is merely a matter of form and not of substance. It also pertains to some immaterial defect in a bid or variation of a bid from the exact requirements of the invitation that can be corrected or waived without being prejudicial to other bidders. The defect or variation is immaterial when the effect on price, quantity, quality, or delivery is negligible when contrasted with the total cost or scope of the supplies or services being acquired. The contracting officer either shall give the bidder an opportunity to cure any deficiency resulting from a minor informality or irregularity in a bid or waive the deficiency, whichever is to the advantage of the Government. Examples of minor informalities or irregularities include failure of a bidder to— ( a ) Return the number of copies of signed bids required by the invitation;
( b ) Furnish required information concerning the number of its employees;
( c ) Sign its bid, but only if— ( 1 ) The unsigned bid is accompanied by other material indicating the bidder's intention to be bound by the unsigned bid (such as the submission of a bid guarantee or a letter signed by the bidder, with the bid, referring to and clearly identifying the bid itself); or
( 2 ) The firm submitting a bid has formally adopted or authorized, before the date set for opening of bids, the execution of documents by typewritten, printed, or stamped signature and submits evidence of such authorization and the bid carries such a signature;
( d ) Acknowledge receipt of an amendment to an invitation for bids, but only if— ( 1 ) The bid received clearly indicates that the bidder received the amendment, such as where the amendment added another item to the invitation and the bidder submitted a bid on the item; or
( 2 ) The amendment involves only a matter of form or has either no effect or merely a negligible effect on price, quantity, quality, or delivery of the item bid upon; and
( e ) Execute the representations with respect to Equal Opportunity and Affirmative Action Programs, as set forth in the clauses at 52.222-22, Previous Contracts and Compliance Reports, and 52.222-25, Affirmative Action Compliance.
[48 FR 42171, Sept. 19, 1983, as amended at 55 FR 25527, June 21, 1990; 62 FR 236, Jan. 2, 1997; 64 FR 10532, Mar. 4, 1999]
19.203 Relationship among small business programs. ( a ) *General.* There is no order of precedence among the 8(a) Program (subpart 19.8), HUBZone Program (subpart 19.13), Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business (SDVOSB) Program (subpart 19.14), or the Women-Owned Small Business (WOSB) Program (subpart 19.15).
( b ) *At or below the simplified acquisition threshold.* For acquisitions of supplies or services that have an anticipated dollar value above the micro-purchase threshold, but at or below the simplified acquisition threshold, the requirement at 19.502-2(a) to set aside acquisitions for small business concerns does not preclude the contracting officer from awarding a contract to a small business under the 8(a) Program, HUBZone Program, SDVOSB Program, or WOSB Program.
( c ) *Above the simplified acquisition threshold.* For acquisitions of supplies or services that have an anticipated dollar value exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold definition at 2.101, the contracting officer shall first consider an acquisition for the small business socioeconomic contracting programs (*i.e.,* 8(a), HUBZone, SDVOSB, or WOSB programs) before considering a small business set-aside (see 19.502-2(b)). However, if a requirement has been accepted by the SBA under the 8(a) Program, it must remain in the 8(a) Program unless the SBA agrees to its release in accordance with 13 CFR parts 124, 126, 127, and 128.
( d ) In determining which socioeconomic program to use for an acquisition, the contracting officer should consider, at a minimum— ( 1 ) Results of market research that was done to determine if there are socioeconomic firms capable of satisfying the agency's requirement; and
( 2 ) Agency progress in fulfilling its small business goals.
( e ) Small business set-asides have priority over acquisitions using full and open competition. *See* requirements for establishing a small business set-aside at subpart 19.5.
[75 FR 14567, Mar. 16, 2011, as amended at 76 FR 18309, Apr. 1, 2011; 77 FR 12932, Mar. 2, 2012; 80 FR 38298, July 2, 2015; 81 FR 30439, May 16, 2016; 82 FR 4717, Jan. 13, 2017; 85 FR 11759, Feb. 27, 2020; 85 FR 27090, May 6, 2020; 89 FR 13956, Feb. 23, 2024]
Exhibit 32.2

 

Certification of the Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

 

I, Michael S. Sarner, Chief Financial Officer of Capital Southwest Corporation, certify that, to my knowledge:

|  | 1. |  | The Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2017, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 8, 2017 (“accompanied report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--|----|--|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | 2. |  | The information contained in the accompanied report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of Capital Southwest Corporation. |
|--|----|--|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

|                       |   |                    |
|----------------------------|--------|-------------------------|
| Date:  August 8, 2017 | By:    | /s/ Michael S. Sarner   |
|                       |   | Michael S. Sarner       |
|                       |   | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----