alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

JUAN ZAMORA, and FRANCISCO

ZAMORA, on behalf of themselves, and all

other Plaintiffs similarly situated, known and

unknown,

Plaintiffs,

v.

THE BRICKMAN GROUP LTD.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. 1:12-cv-02020

Honorable Judge Joan B. Gottschall

Magistrate Judge Maria Valdez

JOINT MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF THE PARTIES’ 

STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT AND FOR APPROVAL OF CLASS

CERTIFICATION, FORM AND MANNER OF CLASS NOTICE, AND SCHEDULING

FAIRNESS HEARING FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF SETTLEMENT

Plaintiffs Juan Zamora, Francisco Zamora, and Rafael Gonzales (“Plaintiffs”), on behalf of 

themselves and all others similarly situated, with the agreement of Defendant, move this Court 

for an order preliminarily approving the Parties’ Stipulation of Settlement (attached to the 

accompanying memorandum, filed contemporaneously herewith as Exhibit 1) and an order 

approving class certification for settlement purposes, the form and manner of class notice

(attached to the memorandum as Exhibit 2), and scheduling a Fairness Hearing for final approval 

of settlement. In further support of this Joint Motion, the Parties have contemporaneously filed a 

memorandum in support, which is incorporated herein by reference.

[Signature Follows Next Page]

Case: 1:12-cv-02020 Document #: 41 Filed: 11/19/13 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:86
2

Jointly submitted,

Electronically Filed 11/19/2013

/s/ John W. Billhorn

___________________________

John William Billhorn

BILLHORN LAW FIRM

120 S. State Street, Suite 400

Chicago, IL 60603

(312) 853-1450

Ana Dominguez

FARMWORKER AND LANDSCAPER

ADVOCACY PROJECT

33 N. LaSalle, Suite 900

Chicago, IL 60602

(312) 784-3541

Attorneys’ for Plaintiff, and all other 

Plaintiffs similarly situated, known or 

unknown

DEFENDANT

THE BRICKMAN GROUP LTD. LLC

By: /s/ Michael D. Ray

 One of Its Attorneys

Michael H. Cramer (ARDC No. 6199313)

Michael D. Ray (ARDC No. 6285109)

OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH,

 SMOAK & STEWART, P.C.

155 North Wacker Drive, Suite 4300

Chicago, IL 60606

312.558.1220

Case: 1:12-cv-02020 Document #: 41 Filed: 11/19/13 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:87
3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Please take notice that the foregoing Motion was filed electronically via the Court’s 

electronic filing system this 19th day of November, 2013. Service will be made via operation of 

that system upon:

John Billhorn

Billhorn Law Firm

120 S. State St., Suite 400

Chicago, IL 60603

jbillhorn@billhornlaw.com

Ana Dominguez

Farmworker & Landscaper Advocacy Project

100 W. Monroe St., Suite 1800

Chicago, IL 60603

agarcia@fwadvocacy.org

/s/ Michael D. Ray 

16474390.1

Case: 1:12-cv-02020 Document #: 41 Filed: 11/19/13 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:88
#### Phillips Petroleum Company, Respondent, v. Premium Coal & Oil Company, Inc., Appellant.

Order entered on July 9, 1962, which granted plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, unanimously reversed, on the law, with $20 costs and disbursements to the appellant and the motion denied, with costs. An issue of fact is raised with respect to whether the mooring furnished was safe within the meaning of the contract. If in fact it was, then the plaintiff would not be entitled to recover. Furthermore, even if summary judgment were warranted on the question of liability it was *614improper on this motion for the court to fix the amount of damage. Whether the defendant took proper steps by way of mitigation presents issues to be tried. Concur — Rabin, J. P., Stevens, Eager, Bergan and Bastow, JJ.
**Team II – Foreign Schools**

01/20/2010

PAGE  

1
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Norbert Paul Eastman, Appellant.

Motion for an extension of time within which to perfect appeal. Motion granted and the time to perfect appeal, file note of issue, and file and serve record and brief is extended to August 15, I960, and the case is to be placed on the September Term of this court for argument. Present — Bergan, P. J., Coon, Gibson, Herlihy and Reynolds, JJ.'
#### SNYDAM et al. v. VOGEL.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.

November 18, 1903.)

1. Broker's—Commissions—Services.

Where, though defendant employed plaintiff to find a tenant for the first loft of his building, defendant availed himself of plaintiff’s services in finding a tenant for the upper loft, and plaintiff consented, at defendant’s request, to permit defendant to negotiate personally with the *916tenant, on his promise to protect plaintiff’s interest as a broker, plaintiff was entitled to compensation for his services in finding a tenant for such loft.

Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Sixth District.

Action by Harry D. Snydam and others against Martin H. Vogel. From a Municipal Court judgment in favor of plaintiffs, defendant appeals. Affirmed.

Argued before FREEDMAN, P. J., and BISCHOFF and BLANCHARD, JJ.

Martin H. Vogel, in pro. per.

Corbin & O’Ryan, for respondents.

BLANCHARD, J.

This action is brought to recover for services rendered by the plaintiffs, as real estate brokers, to the defendant, in securing for him a tenant for a loft in Nos. 178 and 180 Grand street. The evidence clearly establishes the fact that it was due to the plaintiffs’ efforts that the upper loft was rented to the te..^nt, Loeb, although the scope of the plaintiffs’ original employment contemplated the renting of the first loft. It was through the agency of the plaintiffs that Loeb and the defendant met and concluded the negotiations which resulted in the renting to Loeb of the upper loft. The plaintiff testified that, at the defendant’s request', and upon his promise to protect his interests as broker, he consented to allow the defendant to negotiate directly and personally with Loeb. The defendant gave testimony which in some measure tended to controvert this testimony of the plaintiff, but the trial court has passed upon the facts of the case, and, as the defendant has had the benefit of the plaintiffs’ services, there is no good reason why he should not pay for them.

The judgment appealed from should be affirmed, with costs. All concur.
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

SITE SECURITYSite Security & Intrusion Detection

For security purposes and to make sure this service remains available to all users, we use special software programs for monitoring network traffic to identify unauthorized attempts to upload or change information, or otherwise to cause damage to this government computer system. These programs collect no information that would directly identify individuals, but they do collect information that could help us identify someone attempting to tamper with this Web site.

If you use this system, you should understand that all activities may be monitored and recorded.  Anyone using this system expressly consents to such monitoring. **WARNING** -- If such monitoring reveals possible evidence of criminal activity, monitoring records may be provided to law enforcement officials.

Except for authorized law enforcement investigations, we make no other attempts to identify individual users or their usage habits. We only use raw monitoring data logs for determining trends in usage patterns and in diagnosing system problems.

If you have any questions or comments about the information presented here, please forward them to us: webmaster@ed.gov.

|        |
|--------|
|   | Printable view |
|        |

## How Do I Find...

          - Student loans, forgiveness
          - College accreditation
          - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
          - FERPA
          - FAFSA
          - 1098, tax forms

More >

## Information About...

          - Transforming Teaching
          - Family and Community Engagement
          - Early Learning

 

|  |
|--|
|  |
|  | Website Policies & Important Links |  |
|  |
|  | Privacy Policy |  |
|  |
|  | Disclaimer of Endorsement |  |
|  |
|  | Copyright Status Notice |  |
|  |

----

*Our mission*

Student Loans
Repaying LoansDefaulted LoansLoan ForgivenessLoan Servicers

Grants & Programs
Apply for Pell GrantsGrants ForecastApply for a GrantEligibility for Grants

Laws & Guidance
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)FERPACivil RightsNew IDEA Website

Data & Research
Education StatisticsPostsecondary Education DataED Data ExpressNation's Report CardWhat Works Clearinghouse

About Us
Contact UsED OfficesJobsPress ReleasesFAQsRecursos en españolBudget, PerformancePrivacy ProgramSubscribe to E-Mail Updates

----

          - Notices
          - FOIA
          - Privacy Policy
          - Accessibility
          - Security
          - Information quality
          - Inspector General
          - Whitehouse.gov
          - USA.gov
          - Benefits.gov
          - Regulations.gov
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. EL21-31-000]

                    On January 5, 2021, the Commission issued an order in Docket No. EL21-31-000 pursuant to section 206 of the Federal Power Act (FPA), 16 U.S.C. 824e (2018), instituting an investigation into whether Highlander Solar Energy Station 1, LLC's Proposed Rates may be unjust, unreasonable, unduly discriminatory or preferential, substantially excessive or otherwise unlawful.                     *Highlander Solar Energy Station 1, LLC, 1*                    74 FERC ¶ 61,003(2020).                

                    The refund effective date in Docket No. EL21-31-000, established pursuant to section 206(b) of the FPA, will be the date of publication of this notice in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                

Any interested person desiring to be heard in Docket No. EL21-31-000 must file a notice of intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate, with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rule 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.214 (2019), within 21 days of the date of issuance of the order.

Dated: January 6, 2021.

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,

Deputy Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2021-00405 Filed 1-11-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM (UNAUDITIED CONSOLIDATED INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF SEPTEMBER 30,
1998) AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                         9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                    SEP-30-1998
<BOOK-VALUE>                                       PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                        $6,275,260
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                        $269,636
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                             $842,968
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                           $403,291
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                     $570,777
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   $8,361,932
<COMMON>                                         $1,217,911
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                            ($790)
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                              $1,740,043
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                   $2,957,164
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    $0
<PREFERRED>                                         $59,376
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                             $2,535,409
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                       $0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                                $0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                           $0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                       $73,172
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                                $0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                              $0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                         $0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                   $2,736,811
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                    $8,361,932
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                        $2,434,635
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                               $256,621
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                       $1,692,125
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                       $1,948,746
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                            $485,889
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                ($15,194)
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                     $470,695
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           $132,631
<NET-INCOME>                                       $338,064
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        ($2,225)
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                      $335,839
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                           $209,676
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                           $98,375
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                             $733,934
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          2.33
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          2.33
        

</TABLE>
#### 19.202-3 Equal low bids.

In the event of equal low bids (see 14.408-6), awards shall be made first to small business concerns which are also labor surplus area concerns, and second to small business concerns which are not also labor surplus area concerns.

[60 FR 48261, Sept. 18, 1995]
UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGECOMMISSION

**Washington****, DC 20549**

 

Form 10-K

(Mark One)

[X]   ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TOSECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

 

or

 

[ ]   TRANSITIONREPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF1934

     

 

 

 

Indicate by check mark ifthe registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of theSecurities Act. Yes [ ] No [X]

 

Indicate by check mark ifthe registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)of the Exchange Act. Yes [ ] No [X]

 

Indicate by check markwhether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file suchreports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90days. Yes [X] No [ ]

 

Indicate by check markwhether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporateWeb site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted andposted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (232.405 of this chapter) duringthe preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant wasrequired to submit and post such files). [ ] Yes  [ ] No

 

Indicate by check mark ifdisclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (section229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant’s knowledge,in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in PartIII of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [X]

 

Indicate by check markwhether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, anon-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of“large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company”in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrantis a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes [ ] No[X]

 

State the aggregate marketvalue of the voting and non-voting partnership interests held by non-affiliatescomputed by reference to the price at which the partnership interests were lastsold, or the average bid and asked price of such partnership interests as of thelast business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscalquarter.  No market exists for the limited partnership interests of theRegistrant, and, therefore, no aggregate market value can bedetermined.

 

**DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BYREFERENCE**

**None**

** **
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 15 (Tuesday, January 26, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 7101-7102]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-01561]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Eye Institute; Notice of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Eye Institute Special Emphasis 
Panel; NEI Center Core Grant for Vision Research (P30).
    Date: March 4, 2021.
    Time: 9:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, 
6700B Rockledge Drive, Suite 3400, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual 
Meeting).
    Contact Person: Jeanette M. Hosseini, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, 
6700B Rockledge Drive, Suite 3400, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-451-2020, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#79131c18171c0d0d1c11391418101557171011571e160f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d3b9b6b2bdb6a7a7b6bb93beb2babffdbdbabbfdb4bca5">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Name of Committee: National Eye Institute Special Emphasis 
Panel; NEI Individual Mentored Career Awards.
    Date: March 10, 2021.
    Time: 10:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, 
6700B Rockledge Drive, Suite 3400, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual 
Meeting).
    Contact Person: Jennifer C. Schiltz, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Branch, Division of Extramural 
Activities, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, 
6700B Rockledge Drive, Suite 3400, Bethesda, MD 20817, 240-276-5864, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#83e9e6ededeae5e6f1adf0e0ebeaeff7f9c3edeaebade4ecf5"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="68020d0606010e0d1a461b0b0001041c1228060100460f071e">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.867, 
Vision Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)


[[Page 7102]]


    Dated: January 19, 2021.
Melanie J. Pantoja,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2021-01561 Filed 1-25-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### 1836.602 Selection of firms for architect-engineer contracts.
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of MDI, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, J. Collier Sparks,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/
      J. Collier SparksJ.
      Collier SparksPrincipal
      Executive Officer
              March
      25, 2009
#### 1325.1001 Waiver of right to examination of records.

The designee authorized to execute a determination and findings in accordance with FAR 25.1001(a)(2)(iii) set forth in CAM 1301.70.