alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §6901. Purpose

The purpose of this chapter is to provide the Secretary of Agriculture with the necessary authority to streamline and reorganize the Department of Agriculture to achieve greater efficiency, effectiveness, and economies in the organization and management of the programs and activities carried out by the Department.

(Pub. L. 103–354, title II, §202, Oct. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 3209.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this title", meaning title II of Pub. L. 103–354, Oct. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 3209, known as the Department of Agriculture Reorganization Act of 1994. For complete classification of title II to the Code, see Short Title note below and Tables.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Short Title of 2000 Amendment

Pub. L. 106–222, §1, June 20, 2000, 114 Stat. 353, provided that: "This Act [enacting subchapter X of this chapter] may be cited as the 'Freedom to E-File Act'."

#### Short Title

Pub. L. 103–354, §1(a), Oct. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 3178, provided that: "This Act [see Tables for classification] may be cited as the 'Federal Crop Insurance Reform and Department of Agriculture Reorganization Act of 1994'."

Pub. L. 103–354, title II, §201(a), Oct. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 3209, provided that: "This title [see Tables for classification] may be cited as the 'Department of Agriculture Reorganization Act of 1994'."
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

EASTERN DIVISION 

DECKERS OUTDOOR CORPORATION, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

LIYANGHUA et al., 

 Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No. 11-cv-7970 

Honorable Ronald A. Guzman 

Magistrate Martin C. Ashman 

DECKERS OUTDOOR CORPORATION’S MOTION FOR ENTRY OF A 

PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND SERVICE OF PROCESS BY EMAIL AND

ELECTRONIC PUBLICATION ORDER

Deckers Outdoor Corporation (“Deckers”) seeks to convert the Temporary Restraining 

Oder against Defendants into a Preliminary Injunction and Service of Process by Email and 

Electronic Publication. Such application is based upon this Motion and the concurrently filed 

Memorandum of Law in Support. 

 

Case: 1:11-cv-07970 Document #: 28 Filed: 12/07/11 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:427
Dated this 7th day of December 2011. 

Respectfully submitted, 

_____/s/ Justin R. Gaudio_____________

Kevin W. Guynn 

Amy Ziegler 

Justin R. Gaudio 

Greer, Burns & Crain, Ltd. 

300 South Wacker Drive, Suite 2500 

Chicago, Illinois 60606 

312.360.0080 

312.360.9315 (facsimile) 

 jgaudio@gbclaw.net

Case: 1:11-cv-07970 Document #: 28 Filed: 12/07/11 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:428
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

 I hereby certify that on the 7th day of December, 2011, I will electronically file the 

foregoing with the Clerk of the Court, using the CM/ECF system and that I will e-mail the 

documents to all Defendants at the e-mail addresses identified in Schedule A to Decker’s First 

Amended Complaint. 

 

Greer, Burns & Crain Ltd. 

Attorneys for Plaintiff Deckers, 

_____/s/ Justin R. Gaudio_____________

Kevin W. Guynn 

Amy Ziegler 

Justin R. Gaudio 

Greer, Burns & Crain, Ltd. 

300 South Wacker Drive, Suite 2500 

Chicago, Illinois 60606 

312.360.0080 

312.360.9315 (facsimile) 

 kguynn@gbclaw.net 

 aziegler@gbclaw.net 

 jgaudio@gbclaw.net 

Case: 1:11-cv-07970 Document #: 28 Filed: 12/07/11 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:429
### §§71 to 78. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Sections 71 to 78 transferred to sections 1501 to 1508, respectively, of Title 48, Territories and Insular Possessions.
#### New York Plumbers Specialties Company Inc., v. Columbia Casualty Company.

Motion for a stay granted on condition that the appellant procures the record on appeal and appellant’s points to be served and filed on or before December 5, 1960, with notice of argument for the January 1961 Term of this court, said appeal to be argued or submitted when reached. The appellant’s time to serve its amended answer is hereby extended until 20 days after service upon appellant’s attorney of a copy of the order of this court determining the appeal, with notice of entry. Concur — Botein, P. J., Rabin, Stevens and Eager, JJ.
| 1.   | the Form 10-Q, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 4, 2010 (“accompanied report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | the information contained in the accompanied report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of Capital Southwest Corporation. |
|----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: November 4, 2010      | By: /s/ Tracy L. Morris                                                                 |
|------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                 | Tracy L. Morris, Chief Financial Officer                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                |
#### 1033.201 Definitions.

*Agency Board of Contract Appeals* means the Civilian Board of Contract Appeals (CBCA). The CBCA is the authorized representative of the Secretary of the Treasury in hearing, considering, and determining all appeals of decisions of Contracting Officers filed by contractors pursuant to FAR Subpart 33.2. Appeals are governed by the Rules of Procedure of the CBCA.
#### 1409.206-1 General.

The HCA is the approval official referenced in FAR 9.206-1(b).
<PAGE>   1

                                   EXHIBIT 23


                     CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

We have issued our report dated August 25, 2000, accompanying the financial
statements included in the Annual Report of Venture Catalyst Incorporated
(formerly Inland Entertainment Corporation) on Form 10-KSB for the year ended
June 30, 2000. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said
report in the Registration Statements of Inland Entertainment Corporation on
Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-19743, effective January 14, 1997, 333-19745, effective
January 14, 1997, 333-19747, effective January 14, 1997, 333-44179, effective
January 13, 1998 and 333-82169, effective July 2, 1999).

/s/ Grant Thornton LLP

Irvine, California
September 25, 2000
<PAGE>

              Consent of Independent Certified Public Accountants
              ---------------------------------------------------


The Board of Directors
AM Communications, Inc. and Subsidiary


         We have issued our report dated June 13, 2001 accompanying the
financial statements included in the Annual Report of AM Communications, Inc.
and Subsidiary on Form 10-KSB for the year ended March 31, 2001. We hereby
consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration
Statements of AM Communications, Inc. on Forms S-8 (File No. 333-32826,
effective March 20, 2000, File No. 333-35988 effective May 1, 2000).


/s/ Grant Thornton LLP
----------------------
Grant Thornton LLP
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
June 29, 2001
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

About EDCONTACTS

## Where do I start?

Grantmaking at ED provides an overview of the grants process from start to finish.

You may also want to see our Grant Information page.

## How do I find out what grants have been awarded?

Visit USASpending.gov for federal spending information, including the Department’s spending on grants.

Spending Data Maps, Timelines and Advanced Search on USASpending.gov:
                -  Prime Award Spending Data: Grants from Department of Education 
                -  Sub-award Spending Data: Grants from Department of Education 

The Institute of Education Sciences provides a searchable database of the research grants it has awarded.

|        |
|--------|
|   | Printable view |
|        |

## How Do I Find...

          - Student loans, forgiveness
          - College accreditation
          - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
          - FERPA
          - FAFSA
          - 1098, tax forms

More >

## Information About...

          - Transforming Teaching
          - Family and Community Engagement
          - Early Learning

 

|  |
|--|
|  |
|  | Other Sites |  |
|  |

----

*Our mission*

Student Loans
Repaying LoansDefaulted LoansLoan ForgivenessLoan Servicers

Grants & Programs
Apply for Pell GrantsGrants ForecastApply for a GrantEligibility for Grants

Laws & Guidance
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)FERPACivil RightsNew IDEA Website

Data & Research
Education StatisticsPostsecondary Education DataED Data ExpressNation's Report CardWhat Works Clearinghouse

About Us
Contact UsED OfficesJobsPress ReleasesFAQsRecursos en españolBudget, PerformancePrivacy ProgramSubscribe to E-Mail Updates

----

          - Notices
          - FOIA
          - Privacy Policy
          - Accessibility
          - Security
          - Information quality
          - Inspector General
          - Whitehouse.gov
          - USA.gov
          - Benefits.gov
          - Regulations.gov
#### ALLABEN, Respondent, v. KITTLE et al., Appellants.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

November 11, 1903.)

Action by Charles S. Allaben, administrator with the will annexed of Orson M. Allaben, deceased, against Emily Kittle and Willard E. Kittle.

No opinion. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs.
Additional Indirect Cost Information and Example for Training Grants 

If you are applying for a discretionary grant that the U.S. Department of Education considers to be a “Training grant,” your 

indirect cost reimbursement is limited. See the Education Department General Administration Regulations (EDGAR), 34 CFR 

75.562, Indirect cost rates for educational training projects at:http://www.ed.gov/policy/fund/reg/edgarReg/edlite-part75e.html

Indirect cost reimbursement on ED training grants is limited to the grantee’s actual indirect costs as determined by the 

grantee’s negotiated indirect cost rate agreement or 8% of a modified total direct cost base, whichever is less. Indirect costs in 

excess of the 8% limit may not be charged directly, used to satisfy matching or cost-sharing requirements, or charged to 

another Federal award. 

For the purposes of calculating indirect costs for training grants, EDGAR, §75.562(c), defines a modified total direct cost base 

as: 

“total direct costs less stipends, tuition and related fees, and capital expenditures of $5,000 or more.” 

Note: This limitation on indirect cost reimbursement for training grants does not apply to agencies of State or local 

governments, including federally recognized Indian tribal governments. However, the 8% limit applies to cost-type contracts 

under grants, if these contracts are for training as defined in EDGAR, §75.562(a). 

Below is a simplified example for calculating indirect costs for a training grant using the budget categories from the ED 524 

form, Budget Information – Non-construction Programs. The ED 524 and Instructions can be found at: 

http://www.ed.gov/fund/grant/apply/appforms/appforms.html

For the purposes of this example, 8% of a modified total direct cost base is used to calculate indirect costs. 

1. Personnel 174,000 

2. Fringe Benefits 50,000 

3. Travel 10,000 

4. Equipment 8,200 

5. Supplies 920 

6. Contractual 4,900 

7. Construction - 

8. Other (Tuition) 5,400 

9. Total Direct Costs 253,420 

Calculate Modified Total Direct Cost Base 

Total Direct Costs 253,420 

Less: 

Equipment 8,200 

Tuition 5,400 

 13,600 

Modified Total Direct Cost Base: 239,820 

Multiply $239,820 by 8%: 19,186 

10. Indirect Costs 19,186 

11. Training Stipends 6,300 

12. Total Costs 278,906
**Management Statement of Financial Responsibility**The financial statements of Tellabs, Inc., and Subsidiaries have been prepared under thedirection of management in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. In theopinion of management, the financial statements set forth a fair presentation of theconsolidated financial condition of Tellabs, Inc., and Subsidiaries at December 29, 2000, andDecember 31, 1999, and the consolidated results of its operations for the years ended December29, 2000, December 31, 1999, and January 1, 1999.    The Company maintains accounting systems and related internal controlswhich, in the opinion of management, provide reasonable assurances that transactions areexecuted in accordance with management’s authorization, that financial statements areprepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that assets areproperly accounted for and safeguarded.    Ethical decision-making is fundamental to the Company’s managementphilosophy. Management recognizes its responsibility for fostering a strong ethical climate sothat the Company’s affairs are conducted to the highest standards of personal andcorporate conduct. Employee awareness of these objectives is achieved through key writtenpolicy statements and training.    The Board of Directors has appointed three of its non-employee membersas an Audit Committee. This committee meets periodically with management and the independentauditors, who have free access to this committee without management present, to discuss theresults of their audit work and their evaluation of the internal control structure and thequality of financial reporting.***/s Michael J. Birck***Michael J. BirckChairman of the Board***/s Richard C. Notebaert***Richard C. NotebaertPresident and Chief Executive Officer***/s Joan E. Ryan***Joan E. RyanExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerJanuary 19, 2001
**Consolidated Statements of Earnings**(In thousands, except per-share data)**Year**
### §1424. Utilization of services and facilities of Commodity Credit Corporation

The Secretary, in carrying out programs under section 612c of this title and section 1755 of title 42, may utilize the services and facilities of the Commodity Credit Corporation (including but not limited to procurement by contract), and make advance payments to it.

(Oct. 31, 1949, ch. 792, title IV, §404, 63 Stat. 1054; Pub. L. 106–78, title VII, §752(b)(2), Oct. 22, 1999, 113 Stat. 1169.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1999—Pub. L. 106–78 made technical amendment to reference in original act which appears in text as reference to section 1755 of title 42.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Exceptions From Transfer of Functions

Functions of Corporations of Department of Agriculture, boards of directors and officers of such corporations; Advisory Board of Commodity Credit Corporation; and Farm Credit Administration or any agency, officer, or entity of, under, or subject to supervision of said Administration excepted from functions of officers, agencies, and employees transferred to Secretary of Agriculture by 1953 Reorg. Plan No. 2, §1, effective June 4, 1953, 18 F.R. 3219, 67 Stat. 633, set out as a note under section 2201 of this title.
Case: 1:11-cv-09236 Document #: 5 Filed: 01/30/12 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:8
Case: 1:11-cv-09236 Document #: 5 Filed: 01/30/12 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:9
#### 2003.101-3 Agency regulations.

Standards of conduct for Federal employees are published in 5 CFR parts 2635 and 5801. Requirements for financial disclosure are published in 5 CFR part 2634.
Case: 1:12-cv-01163 Document #: 13 Filed: 04/09/12 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:25
Case: 1:12-cv-01163 Document #: 13 Filed: 04/09/12 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:26
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                       5
<MULTIPLIER>                    1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               APR-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                    JAN-31-1998
<CASH>                          261,417
<SECURITIES>                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                   1,325,651
<ALLOWANCES>                    360,709
<INVENTORY>                     2,043,754
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                3,745,833
<PP&E>                          1,946,715
<DEPRECIATION>                  1,084,816
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  11,442,875
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           2,886,550
<BONDS>                         2,241,242
<COMMON>                        102,775
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     7,500
<OTHER-SE>                      6,143,658
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    11,442,875
<SALES>                         2,269,607
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                2,269,607
<CGS>                           1,693,132
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   2,132,993
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                61,061 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              71,953
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 125,722
<INCOME-TAX>                    52,803
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             72,919
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    72,919
<EPS-PRIMARY>                   .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                   .01
        

</TABLE>
#### 1850.104 Residual powers.
§ 651.41 Conditions requiring an EIS. An EIS is required when a proponent, preparer, or approving authority determines that the proposed action has the potential to: ( a ) Significantly affect environmental quality, or public health or safety.
( b ) Significantly affect historic (listed or eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places, maintained by the National Park Service, Department of Interior), or cultural, archaeological, or scientific resources, public parks and recreation areas, wildlife refuge or wilderness areas, wild and scenic rivers, or aquifers.
( c ) Significantly impact prime and unique farmlands located off-post, wetlands, floodplains, coastal zones, or ecologically important areas, or other areas of unique or critical environmental sensitivity.
( d ) Result in significant or uncertain environmental effects, or unique or unknown environmental risks.
( e ) Significantly affect a federally listed threatened or endangered plant or animal species, a federal candidate species, a species proposed for federal listing, or critical habitat.
( f ) Either establish a precedent for future action or represent a decision in principle about a future consideration with significant environmental effects.
( g ) Adversely interact with other actions with individually insignificant effects so that cumulatively significant environmental effects result.
( h ) Involve the production, storage, transportation, use, treatment, and disposal of hazardous or toxic materials that may have significant environmental impact.
( i ) Be highly controversial from an environmental standpoint.
( j ) Cause loss or destruction of significant scientific, cultural, or historical resources.
#### 1401.7001-5 Acquisition Management Reviews.

Acquisition Management Reviews (AMRs) are to be conducted using the Government Accountability Office's (GAO) “Framework for Assessing the Acquisition Function at Federal Agencies” available at *http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d05218g.pdf.*
#### LITTAUER et al. v. STERN.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

December 3, 1903.)

Action by Lucius N. Littauer and another against James Stern.

No opinion. Motion granted, and the following question certified: After the granting and service of the order of Mr. Justice John M. Kellogg on the 9th day.of May, 1903, were plaintiffs authorized to enter judgment as upon default before the time to answer as extended by said order expired?
1828.311-1 Contract clause. The contracting officer shall insert the clause at FAR 52.228-7, Insurance—Liability to Third Persons, in solicitations and contracts, other than those for construction contracts and those for architect-engineer services, when a cost-reimbursement contract is contemplated unless— ( a ) Waived by the procurement officer; or
( b ) The successful offeror represents in its offer that it is totally immune from tort liability as a State agency or as a charitable institution.
[65 FR 54440, Sept. 8, 2000, as amended at 80 FR 12944, Mar. 12, 2015]
#### 1901.602-1 Authority.

The Broadcasting Board of Governors Contracting Officers designated by name on Certificates of Appointment by the Board Procurement Executive are authorized to enter into, administer, and terminate contracts and make related determinations and findings, subject to all requirements and limitations set forth in the Certificate of Appointment. A list of the Broadcasting Board of Governors employees who have been appointed as Contracting Officers and the limits of their authority is available from the Policy and Procedures Staff, Office of Contracts.