# ATTACHMENT 

# G

# •

I 

## 1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11 

# • 12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23 

# •

j 

## BEFORE THE STATE OF INDIANA AIR POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD

PUBLIC MEETING OF JULY 1, 2009 

# ORIGINAL

PROCEEDINGS
before the Indiana Air Pollution Control Board,
Thomas Anderson, Chairman, taken before me, Lindy L. Meyer, Jr., a Notary Public in and for
the State of Indiana, County of Shelby, at the
Indiana Government Center South, Conference Center, Room A, 402 West Washington Street, Indianapolis, Indiana, on Wednesday, July 1, 2009

at 1:01 o'clock p.m.

William F. Daniels, RPR/CP CM d/b/a ACCURATE REPORTING OF INDIANA 12922 Brighton Avenue Carmel, Indiana 46032 (317) 848-0088 1

### 1

2



### 3



### 4


### 5



### 6

7

8

9 

## APPEARANCES:
BOARD MEMBERS:
Thomas Anderson, Chairman Randy Staley Chris Horn David Benshoof Jeffery L. Quyle Greg Kissel Howard W. Cundiff, Proxy, State Board of Health Pamela Fisher, Proxy, Indiana Economic Development Corporation Brandon Seitz, Proxy, Lieutenant Governor

10 IDEM STAFF MEMBERS:

11


### 12 

## Thomas W. Easterly, Commissioner Daniel Murray, Asst. Commissioner Pat Troth Ann Long 13 Manda Clevenger Susan Bern 14 Betsy Rouse Janet Pittman 15 

## 16 PUBLIC SPEAKERS:
17 Gary Loveless Abe Barnett 18 William Sanders Janet McCabe 19
20
21
22
23 2 

# •

•

•

# •

I 

## 1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11 

# • 12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23 

# •

I 

## 1:01 o'clock p.m. July 1, 2009

CHAIRMAN ANDERSON: The July 1, 2009 meeting of the Air Pollution Control Board will

now come to order. A quorum of the Board is present.
I'll now introduce the members and their representation: David Benshoof, representing
small business; Pamela Fisher, proxy for the
Indiana Economic Development Corporation; Howard Cundiff, proxy for the Department of Health;
Chris Horn, representing labor; Gregory Kissel, representing manufacturing; Brandon Seitz, proxy for the Lieutenant Governor; Randy Staley, representing agriculture; Jeffrey Quyle, representing local government; Dr. Stevens is not here; John's not here; obviously Dr. Miner, the Chairman, is not attending today; and I'm Acting
Chairman Tom Anderson, representing
environmental.
First we will have a report from the
Commissioner. I see Mr. Easterly is here, so we will

-- 3

## ··~.') 

## 1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23 All MR. STALEY: Second.
CHAIRMAN ANDERSON: By Randy
in favor, say aye.

MR. HORN: Aye.
MR. QUYLE: Aye.
MR. KISSEL: Aye.
MR. SEITZ: Aye.
MS. FISHER: Aye.
MR. CUNDIFF: Aye.
MR. BENSHOOF: Aye.
MR. STALEY: Aye.
CHAIRMAN ANDERSON: Aye. Opposed? (No response. ) Staley.

CHAIRMAN ANDERSON: Motion carries.
The minutes are approved.
Now we•ll move to rulemaking action. 15

There will be a hearing prior to consideration of
each of the following rulemaking actions: No. 1,
final adoption of amendments to 326 IAC 6-6-5 and
326 IAC 7-4-14, Mittal Steel, LSA No. 7-88.
The second rulemaking action will be preliminarily

-- preliminary adoption of 

# •

•

•

## 18

# ~ 1 submissions will be available for public
2 inspection at the Office of Legal Counsel.
3 Copies will be made for the cost of copying.
4 Will the official reporter for the cause 5 please stand?
6 (Reporter sworn.)
7 CHAIRMAN ANDERSON: The purpose of
8 this hearing is to give all interested persons an 9 opportunity to comment on the topics open for
10 hearing today.
11 

# • 12 D-1 (a). This a public hearing before the
Air Pollution Control Board of the State of
13 Indiana regarding final adoption of amendments to
14 326 IAC 6-6-5 and IAC 7-4-14, Mittal Steel, LSA
15 No. 7-88.
16 I will now introduce Exhibit 1-A, the
17 proposed rule as published under IAC 13-14-9-11,
18 with IDEM's suggested changes incorporated, and
19 Exhibit 1-B, the proposed rule as preliminarily
20 adopted and published under IAC 13-14-9-11, and
21 Exhibit 1-C, the proposed rules as preliminarily
22 adopted and published under IAC 13-14-9-5, into
23 

# • the record of the hearing.

)

### 19**-~** 

# •

/ 

### 1 

## Is there anyone from the Department who

2 

## would like to comment on the rule?
3 

## MS. LONG: My name is Ann Long. I'm

4 

## with the Office of Legal Counsel and I'm an
5 

## attorney there, and I'm substituting for Ms. Amy

6 

## Smith, the rulewriter, who had her baby.

7 

## The rule we are looking at today concerns
8 

## final adoption of amendments to rules concerning
9 

## operations at Arcelor Mittal Burns Harbor, LLC,
10 

## and those amendments pertain to 326 

## IAC 6-6-5
11
12 

## concerning fugitive dust control, and
326 

## IAC 7-4-14, 

## concerning removal of the S0 2 

# •

13 

## blast furnace gas flare limit.
14 

## Due to additional changes after
15 

## preliminary adoption of the rule that I believe
16 

## was in October 2007, 

## the amended rule was
17 

## published for an additional comment period,
18 

## according to the Board's direction at the April
19 

## Board meeting.
20 

## The additional changes only affected the

21 

## fugitive dust control plan portion of the rule,

22 

## and there were no comments submitted during the
23 

## additional comment period that occurred after the 

# •

## 20

# ··~ 1 April Board meeting and after publication of the
2 rule. There was an informal teleconference where
3 staff addressed questions from interested parties
4 after that last Board meeting.
5 Are there any other questions?
6 CHAIRMAN ANDERSON: Any questions?
7 (No response. )
8 CHAIRMAN ANDERSON: If not, thank
9 you. 10 MS. LONG: Thank you. 11 CHAIRMAN ANDERSON: I do not have any 

# • 12 cards submitted, but is there anyone who wishes
13 to speak on the rules?
14 (No response. )
15 CHAIRMAN ANDERSON: If not, this
16 hearing is now concluded. We'll move to Board
17 action on final adoption of amendments to
18 326 IAC 6-6-5 and 326 IAC 7-4-14, Mittal Steel,
19 LSA No. 7-88. Are there any questions from the
20 Board?
21 (No response.)
22 CHAIRMAN ANDERSON: If not, I will
23 entertain a motion for

-- I guess it

-- is it 

# •

/

## 1 final adoption? We don't have any other

-- we 2 don't have any amendments to

--
3 

## MS. TROTH: You know, what you 4 need

-- I think what you need to do is adopt
5 IDEM's suggested changes to the preliminarily
6 adopted rule.

7 

## CHAIRMAN ANDERSON: Okay. So, that
8 would

-- I will entertain a motion to consider
9 the adoption of the amendments from staff.

10
11
12


### 13
14 

## MR. BENSHOOF: So moved.
CHAIRMAN ANDERSON: Moved by David.
And is there a second?
MR. QUYLE: Second.
CHAIRMAN ANDERSON: Jeffery seconds.
15 And all in favor of the amendments, say 16 aye.
17
18
19
20
21


## 22

23 

## MR.
MR.
MR.
MR.
MS.
MR.
MR. HORN: Aye. QUYLE: Aye.
KISSEL: Aye.
SEITZ: Aye.
FISHER: Aye.
CUNDIFF: Aye.
BENSHOOF: Aye. 21 

# •

•

•

# •

•• MR. STALEY: Aye.
CHAIRMAN ANDERSON: Aye. 1


### 2

3

4


### 5 

## All opposed, nay. (No response.)
CHAIRMAN ANDERSON: The amendments
6 carry. 7 Now I will entertain a motion for

-- to
8 final adopt the rules as amended.
MR. STALEY: So moved.
CHAIRMAN ANDERSON: Randy Staley 9


### 10

11


## 12
13 

## moves
. Is there a second?
MR. CUNDIFF: Second.
CHAIRMAN ANDERSON: I'm sorryi who
14 said it?
15
16 

## MR. CUNDIFF: (Raised hand.)
CHAIRMAN ANDERSON: Howard Cundiff
17 seconds. I wi 11 now poll the Board.
18 Mr. Benshoof?
19
20


## 21 votes aye. MR. BENSHOOF: Yes.
CHAIRMAN ANDERSON:

22 Mr. Cundiff?
23 

## MR. CUNDIFF: Aye. Mr. Benshoof 22

## 24



# - I 

## 1 MR. STALEY: Aye.
2 CHAIRMAN ANDERSON: Mr. Staley votes
3 aye, and I will vote aye as well, and the motion
4 carries. The rule is final adopted.
5 We'll now move to the next item, which is
6 a public hearing before the Air Pollution Control
7 Board of the State of Indiana regarding
8 preliminary adoption of amendments to
9 326 IAC 13-1.1 concerning Definition of "Antique
10 Vehicle" in the Vehicle Inspection and
11 Maintenance Rules related to Porter County, LSA 

# • 12 No. 8-674.
13 I will now introduce Exhibit 2-A, the
14 draft rule, into the record. Is there anyone 15 from the Department who would like to comment on 16 the rule?
17 MS. TROTH: Manda Clevenger.
18 MS. CLEVENGER: My name is Manda
19 Clevenger, and I'm a rulewriter with the Office
20 of Legal Counsel, Rules Development Branch.
21 The Lake and Porter County Motor Vehicle
22 Inspection and Maintenance program, I/M program, 23 began in 1984 as a measure to improve air quality 

# •**~**

### 82 

# •

1 

## CERTIFICATE

2 

## I, Lindy L. Meyer, Jr., the undersigned
3 Court Reporter and Notary Public residing in the
4 City of Shelbyville, Shelby County, Indiana, do
5 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and
6 correct transcript of the proceedings taken by me 7 on Wednesday, July 1, 2009 in this matter and

8 

## transcribed by me.
9

# ~~~~ Lindy L. Meyer, Jr., 10

11


## 12 Notary Public in and 

# •

13 

## for the State of Indiana.

14 

## 15 My Commission expires October 27, 2016.
16
17
18


## 19
20
21
22
23 

# •

# •

• TITLE 326 AIRPOLLUTION CONTROLBOARD 

# EXHIBIT 1-A

Rap #07-88 ISGBumsHarbor July 1, 2009



### PROPOSEDRULEAS PUBLISHED UNDERIC 13-14-9-11 WITHIDEM'S SUGGESTED CHANGESINCORPORATED
LSADocument#07-88
DIGEST
Amends 326 lAC 6-6-5 and 326 lAC 7-4-14 concerning operations at ArcelorMittal Bums HarborLLC. Note: UnderIC 13-14-9-11, LSADocument#07-88,postedat20071031- IR-326070088PRA, was resubmitted forpublication andrepostedat20090513-IR326070088PRA. Effective 30 days after filing withthePublisher.

HISTORY First Notice: February 21,2007, IndianaRegister (DIN: 20070221-IR-326070088FNA). SecondNotice: August 8, 2007, IndianaRegister (DIN: 20070808-IR-326070088SNA). Notice ofFirstHearing: August 8, 2007, IndianaRegister (DIN: 20070808-IR326070088PHA)

. Date ofFirstHearing: October 3, 2007. ProposedRule: October 31,2007,Indiana Register (DIN: 20071031-IR-326070088PRA) Notice ofSecondHearing: October 31,2007,IndianaRegister (DIN: 20071031-IR326070088PHA). Change inNotice ofPublic Hearing: January 16,2008,IndianaRegister (DIN: 20080116-IR-326070088CHA). Change inNotice ofPublic Hearing: December3, 2008, IndianaRegister (DIN: 20081203-IR-326070088CHA). Change in Notice ofPublic Hearing: February25,2009,Indiana Register (DIN: 20090225-IR-326070088CHA). Date ofSecond Hearing: April!, 2009.

. ProposedRule: May 13, 2009, IndianaRegister (DIN: 20090513-IR-326070088PRA). Notice ofThird Hearing: May 13,2009, IndianaRegister (DIN: 20090513-IR326070088PHA). Date ofThirdHearing: July 1, 2009

326lAC 6-6-5 326lAC 7-4-14
SECTION 1. 326 lAC 6-6-5 IS AMENDEDTO READ AS FOLLOWS:
326lAC6-6-5 _ArcelorMittalBurnsHarborLLC fugitiveparticulatematteremissioncontrol

1

### plan Authority: IC 13-14-8; IC 13-17 Affected: IC4-21.5; IC 13-11-2-205; IC 13-15 Rap #07-88 ISG Burns Harbor July 1, 2009



### Sec. 5. 

### (a)Inorder toimplementitsnontraditionalfugitivednstcontrolprogram,Bethlehem shall purchase a highpressme \'\later flushing trnck anda: tractor s\l\leeper \'\lith broom and install a: \'\>

### aterfilling stationfor theflnsher trnekandatankfor thestorageanddispensingofliqnidchemical dustretardant.Thefollowingcontrolmeasures shallthenbein1plementedattheDnrnsHarbor Plant atthe specified f1equency. (1) A total oftwenty-fom (24)miles ofpavedandntlpavedroads as showninFigure 1 shall be controlled as describedbelow. (A)A total of12.7milesofpavedtoads shallbecleanedtlnee(3)timesper weekby water washing nsing a flusher trnck exceptas indicated in snbsection (a)(4) ofthis section. Inaddition, atleasttwiceper week, 7.9 miles ofthese roads intheprimary facilities area will also be wetswept nsing a tractor mountedbroom following the flusher trnck. R:oad shoulders on the 12.7 miles ofpaved roads will 

### be graded as requiredandtreated with a chemical dus.tretardarrt atthe samefrequency specified below for m1pa:vedroads. Accmnnlatedmaterialonroadshonlders willberenwved atleast

### once pet ntOrrth. (D) A total of 11.3 miles ofnnpav edroads shallbe controlled. This will consist of forming a nnifonn road surfaceby road grading to remove largematerial, and the applicationofa two (2) to four (4) inchlayer offine slag where necessary. Smfaces shallbesprayedwithdnstsuppressantsolutionatartapplicationrateconsistent witlr 

### themannfactnrer'sreconnnendations.Tiredustsuppressmrtmaterialarrdapplication rate shallbesnchthata ernst will beformed ontheroad snrface that is amenableto cleaning via flushing 

### and sweeping. Road snrfaces shallbecleaned

## twice per week with a flusher trnek followed by a tractor mountedbroom. R:oa:d smfaces shall be resprayed with chernical dust suppressmrt as necessary to maintain a cleanable surface. The solution strength and application rate will be determined prior to applicationbaseduponthe condition ofthe smfaces. (2)Bethlehemshallcontrolits low volatile eoal storagepilesby sprayingthematleastonce per w

### eck with a chemical dustretardmrt. (3)Recordsofallfugitivedustcontrolaetiv itiesshallbenra:irrtained. Atamininmm,records shall containthe following information. (A) number ofmiles and location ofthepavedroads cleaned, (D) nmnber of miles of Utlpaved roads whieh were treated including tlre type, qnantity, and dilutionratio ofdustretardant nsed, (C) tire type, qnantity, mrd dilution ratio ofdnst retardant sprayed on low volatile coal storage piles. Tlris information shall be sunnnarized into progress reports and snbmitted to the board qnarterly.

2 

# •

# • Rap#07-88 ISG BumsHarbor July I, 2009 

### (4) This nonb:aditional fugiti\ie dnst control program can be adjnsted on a dail:y basis as needed to 

### take into acconnt preceding da:y 

### and forecasted meteorological conditions (for example,rainfallandtetnperatnre), andlisnalobservationsoftheroadwa:ys schednledtobe cleaned

.

.(b) Bethlehem Steel Corporation nontraditional fngiti\ie dnst control roads is shown as follo"Ws (Figme 1).**--~- --~------~-----** **--~----** ------------- ----------- ----------------------

-- -------------·--------------------------------



# • 4 

### t '
f --f=lillllollla....tiillllll 

## i 

## • t 

## • j 

### ' ·--t!&lltlll&

........ 

# •**~~**

# .......

(a) ArcelorMittal Burns Harbor LLC shall submit a fugitive particulate matter emission control plan for the Burns Harbor Plant {Plant ID 127-00001) located at U.S. Highway 12 meeting the requirements of this section to the department within three (3) 

## months afterthe effective date ofthis rule, notwithstanding section 3 ofthis rule. Theplan shall be in accordance with and subjectto thefollowing requirements: (1) 326lAC 6-4-6. (2) Emission factors and control efficiencies in 326lAC 6-5-l(d)(1) through 326 lAC 6-5-1(d)(3). (3) ArcelorMittalBurns HarborLLC maypetition the commissionerto use emission

3Rap #07-88 ISG BumsHarbor July 1, 2009 

## factors and control efficiencies other than those referenced in subdivision (2) if adequate support documentation is submitted demonstrating that the submitted emission factors and control efficiencies provide equivalent protection for human health andthe environment.
(b)

## Thefollowing definitions applythroughoutthis section: (1) "As neededbasis"meansthefrequencyofapplicationnecessarytominimizevisible particulatematter emissions as defined in the controlplan. (2) "Fugitiveparticulate matter emissions" means particulatematterthatis emitted from any sourceby means otherthanthrough a stack. (3) "Openaggregatepile"meanstheunenclosedstorageofcoal,whichisfinerthantwo hundred (200) mesh size equalto orgreaterthan onepercent (1%)

## byweight. Open aggregate material mesh size shall be determined by the "American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials Test Method T27-74"*, or other .proceduresequivalentinreliability as approvedbythe commissioner. (4) "Paved road" means any asphalt or concrete surfaced thoroughfare orright-ofway: (A) designed orused for vehiculartraffic; and (B)

## locatedonthepropertyof, orownedby,ArcelorMittalBurnsHarborLLC. (5) "Potentialemissions"meansfugitive particulatematteremissions calculated after the application ofairpollution control: (A) measures; or (B) 

## equipment. (6) 

## "RACM"means reasonably available controlmeasure. (7) 

## "Unpavedroads" means any surfacedthoroughfare orright-of-way, otherthan a pavedroad as defined in subdivision (4), thatis: (A) designed orusedfor vehiculartraffic; and (B)

## locatedonthepropertyof, orownedby,ArcelorMittalBurnsHarborLLC.

{c) The contents andrecordkeeping requirements for thefugitive particulatematter emissions controlplan are as follows: (1) The control plan shall be in writing and include, at a minimum, the following information: (A) The name and address of the owner or operator responsible for the implementation ofthe controlplan. (B) 

## Identification ofall: (i) open aggregatepile areas; (ii) 

## paved-roads; and (iii)

## unpaved roads. that have the potential to emit fugitive particulate matter emissions in

4 

# ., )

# •

• accordancewith subsection (d). Rap #07-88 ISG Burns Harbor July I, 2009



### {C) A map of the ArcelorMit.tal Burns Harbor LLC property showing the following: {i) Open aggregatepile areas. (ii) Access areas aroundthe open aggregatepiles. (iii) Unpavedroads. (iv) Pavedroads. (D) 

### Thequantity andtypes ofvehicular activity occurringon thefollowing: (i) Pavedroads. (ii) 

### Unpavedroads. (E) 

### Quantityofopen aggregate piles thathave thepotentialto emit fugitive particulatematteremissions. (F) 

### Theequipmentusedto maintain open aggregatepiles. (G)A descriptionofthecontrolmeasurestobeimplementedto controlfugitive particulatematter**e~~~:issions**

### resultingfrompotentialemissionpointsidentified in clause {B). (H)

### A specification ofthe dust suppressantmaterialthatwill be used, such as oil or chemical, including the estimated frequency and rates of application, rates, and concentrations ofthe dust suppressant

. (I)

### A specification ofthe particulate matter collection equipmentthatwill be used as a fugitive particulatematteremission control measure. (J) 

### A schedule of compliance with the provisions of the control plan. The schedule shall specify the amountoftimethe sourcerequires to: (i) award anynecessarycontracts; and (ii) 

### commence and complete construction,installation, ormodification ofthefugitive particulatematteremission controlmeasures. (K) Otherrelevantdatathatmayberequestedbythecommissionertoevaluate theeffectiveness ofthe controlplan. (2) Records that document all control measures and activities to beimplemented in accordancewith the approvedcontrolplan shallbe: (A) kept and maintained atArcelorMittalBurnsHarborLLC; {B) 

### retainedfor atleastfive (5) years; and (C) made available upontherequestofthe commissioner. (d) All controlmeasures specifiedinthis subsection shallbeconsidered RACM. The frequency of application for all control measures shall be detailed in the control plan. No control plan shall contain control measures that violate the applicable provisions of state statutes orrules. Fugitiveparticulatematteremissions fromtheemission points specifiedin this section shallbecontrolled as follows: (1) Pavedroads and unpaved roads as follows: (A) Pavedroads bythe use ofone (1) ormoreofthefollowing measures:
5

### (i) 

## Cleaningbyvacuum sweeping. (ii) 

## Flushing. Rap #07-88 ISG BumsHarbor July 1, 2009



### (iii) 

## An alternate RACM that is equivalent in effectiveness to either item (i) or (ii). 

## (B) Unpaved roadsbytheuse ofone (1) ormoreofthefollowing measures: (i)

## Pavingwith a material such as asphalt orconcrete. (ii) 

## Treating with a suitable and effective commercially available petroleumbased dust suppressant orwater based dust suppressant. Thefrequency ofapplication shallbeon an as needed basis. (iii)

## Sprayingwithwater. Thefrequencyofapplication shallbeonan as needed basis. (iv) Double chip and seal the road surface and maintain on an as neededbasis. (v)AnalternateRACMthatis equivalentineffectivenessto one(1)

## or more ofthe above measures. (2) 

## Open aggregatepiles bytheuse ofone (1) 

## ormore ofthefollowing measures: (A) Cleaningthe area aroundtheperimeter ofthe aggregatepiles. (B) 

## Applying a suitable and effective oil or other dust suppressant on an as needed basis. (C) AnalternateRACM,thatis equivalentineffectiveness to one (1) 

## ormoreof the above measures. (e) The approval ofthecontrolplan shallbe in accordancewiththefollowing: (1)

## Withinthree (3) 

## months ofreceiving a controlplan,the commissioner shall notify ArcelorMittalBurnsHarborLLC of: (A) the approval ofthe controlplan; (B) 

## modifications thatthe commissioner deems necessary to the control plan;
or (C) disapproval ofthe controlplan. (2) If

## the commissioner finds a control plan to be incomplete, ArcelorMittal Burns HarborLLC shallprovidethecommissionerwiththerequiredadditionalinformation. (3) Indetermining if

## analternatecontrolmeasurerepresents a RACM as specifiedin thissection,ArcelorMittalBurnsHarborLLCshallsubmitandthecommissionershall considerinformationpertainingtofactors,including,butnotlimitedto,thefollowing: (A) The impact on the environment in terms ofany increase in water, air, or solid wastepollution emissions. (B) 

## The energy requirements ofthe selected control measure
.. (C) The: (i) capital expenditure; (ii) 

## impacton production; and (iii) 

## operating costs;

6 

# .)

# •

-· to implementthe selected controlmeasure. (D) Theimpact ofthese costs. Rap#07-88 ISG BumsHarbor July 1, 2009



### (4)Ifa controlplanisdisapprovedbythecommissioner,ArcelorMittalBurnsHarbor LLC shallhaveuptothirty (30) days from thedateofreceiptofthedisapprovalletter to request, inwriting, a hearing onthe matter. Inthe event a hearingis requested: (A) itshallbeheldinaccordancewiththerequirements setforth inIC4-21.5; and (B) the burden ofproof shall lie with ArcelorMittal Burns Harbor LLC to demonstratewhythe controlplanis appropriate. (5) Thecontrolplan approved bythe commissioner shall becomepartof ArcelorMittal BurnsHarborLLC's operatingpermit. (6) 

### Changesmaybemadeto the controlplanwithoutreopeningtheoperatingpermit bysubmitting a revised controlplan to thecommissionerfor approvalin accordance with this subsection.
(f) 

### The control plan shall be updated at the time of reapplication for the source's operatingpermit or as requiredin 326lAC 2.
*These documents are incorporated byreference. The documents are available for reviewandcopying attheIndianaDepartmentofEnvironmentalManagement, OfficeofAir Quality, Indiana Government Center North, Tenth Floor, 100 North Senate Avenue, Indianapolis,Indiana46204. (AirPollution ControlBoard;326IAC6-6-5;jiledMar10,1988, 1:20p.m.: 11IR2510; readopted filedJan 10, 2001, 3:20p.m.: 24IR 1477)



### SECTION 2. 326 lAC 7-4-14 IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:
326lAC 7-4-14 PorterCountysulfurdioxide emission limitations Authority: IC 13-14-8; IC 13-17 Affected: IC 13-15
Sec. 14. Thefollowing sources andfacilities locatedinPorterCountyshall complywiththe sulfur dioxide emission limitations in pounds permillion Btu (lbs/MMBtu) and pounds perhour (lbs/hr), unless otherwise specified, and otherrequirements: (1) Bethlehem Steel ArcelorMittal Burns Harbor \Yorks 

### LLC shall comply with the following: (A) The following facilities shall burn natural gas only: (i) BOF Shop FMBoiler. (ii) 160inchPlateMillContinuousHardeningandAnnealingHeatTreatment

7 ·.,::L·

### Furnace. (iii) 160 inchPlate Mill BoilersNo.2 and4. (iv) BatchAnnealingFurnaces (24). Rap #07-88 ISG BumsHarbor July 1, 2009



### (v)ContinuousHeatTreatLine- Preheat,HeatingandSoaking,andReheat. (B)Thefollowingfacilitiesshallcomplywiththesulfurdioxideemissionlimitations and otherrequirements: · Emission Limitations Facility Description lbs./MMBtu lbs./hr. (i) BlastFurnace C Stoves 0.83 545 (ii) BlastFurnaceD Stoves 0.83 545 (iii) BlastFmnaceFlare &:&9- 

### {iv1 (iii) 

### SinterPlantWindbox 1.0 poundperton400 

# M (iv) No. 1Coke BatteryUnderfire 

### fri} (v) No. 2 Coke BatteryUnderfire· 

## tvii] (vi) SlabMill Soaking Pits: processmaterial 1.73 1.96· 803 911 

### (AA)NoNotmorethannine(9)ofthirty-two(32)horizontallydischarged soaking pits may be fired on coke oven gas at the same time with total sulfur dioxide emissions not to exceed four hundred eighty-two (482) poundsperhour. (BB) The remaining twenty-three (23) ofthirty-two (32) horizontally discharged soakingpits maybumblastfurnace 

### andfor ornatural gas, or both,with total sulfur dioxide emissions notto exceed twenty-four (24) poundsperhour. (CC) The four (4) vertically discharged soaking pits may bum blast furnace

### andforornaturalgas,orboth,withtotal sulfurdioxideemissions notto exceed four (4) poundsperhour. tvm) 

### (vii) 160 inch Plate Mill Continuous 1.96 299 ReheatFurnaceNo. 1andBoilerNo. 1**~(viii)** 

### 160 inch Plate Mill Continuous 1.96 299 ReheatFurnaceNo. 2 andBoilerNo. 3 

# W (ix) 80 inch Hot Strip MillFurnace 1.96 79 each No. 1, 2, and 3 

### fx:i)' (x) 110 inchPlate Mill FurnacesNo. 1.96 441 1 and2 

### 6cii)- (xi) 110 inch Plate Mill Normalizing 1.07 88 Furnace 

### ttiii) (xii) 160 inch Plate Mill I & 

### 0 1.96 274 FurnacesNo. 4 and 5**~** 

### (xiii) 160 inch Plate Mill I & 

### 0 1.96 274 FurnacesNo. 6 and 7

8 

# .)

# ••



# •

• Rap#07-88 ISGBurns Harbor July 1, 2009 

# tn7 (xiv) 160inchPlateMill

### I & 

### 0 Furnace 1.96 176 No.8**~** 

### (xv) Power Station BoilerNo. 7 0.8 520 

# txviiJ (xvi) Power Station Boilers No. 8, 9, 1.45 2,798 10, 11, 

### and 12 (C) As an alternative to the sulfurdioxide emission limitations specified in clause (B), Bethlehem Steel ArcelorMittal_Burns Harbor LLC shall comply with the sulfur dioxide emission limitations and otherrequirements as follows: EmissionLimitations FacilityDescription lbs./MMBtu lbs./hr. (i) BlastFurnace C Stoves 0.75 498 (ii) BlastFurnace D Stoves 0.75 498 (iii) BlastFmnaceFlare &.eT 

### tfv)-(iii) 

### SinterPlantWindbox 1.0 pound per ton400 process material 

# M (iv) No. 1CokeBatteryUnderfire 1.57 730 

### fri) (v) No. 2 Coke BatteryUnderfire 1.78 828 trii)-(vi) Slab Mill Soaking Pits: (AA) No

### Notmore than six (6) ofthirty-two (32) horizontallydischarged soaking pits may be fired on coke oven gas at the same time with total sulfur dioxide emissions not to exceed two hundred ninety-two (292)
• , pounds perhour. (BB) The remaining twenty-six (26) of thirty-two (32) horizontally discharged soaking pits maybumblastfurnace andfor 

### ornatural gas, or both,withtotal sulfurdioxideemissionsnotto exceedtwenty-seven (27) pounds perhour. (CC) The four (4) vertically discharged soaking pits may bum blast furnaceandiorornatural gas, orboth,withtotal sulfurdioxide emissions notto exceed four (4) poundsperhour. 

### triii) (vii) 160 inch Plate Mill Continuous 1.78 293 Reheat FurnaceNo. 1and BoilerNo. 1 fix)-(viii) 160 inch Plate Mill Continuous 1.78 293 ReheatFurnace No. 2 and BoilerNo. 3 (xT(ix) 80 inch Hot Strip Mill Furnace 1.78 483 each No.1,2, and 3 {xit-(x) 110 inch Plate Mill Furnaces No. 1.78 401 1and2**~** 

### (xi) 110 inch Plate Mill Normalizing 1.07 88 Furnace tmiJ-(xii) 160 inch Plate Mill I & 

## 0 1.78 249 FurnacesNo. 4 and 5

9Rap #07-88 ISGBumsHarbor July 1, 2009


### If 160 inch Plate Milll& 

### 0 

### FurnacesNo.6 

## andftn- or 7, orboth, are in operation
on afuel otherthannatural gas, FurnacesNo.4and 5shall notoperate or shallbum natural gas only. triv] 

### (xiii) 160 inch Plate Mill 

### I & 

### 0 

### 1.78 249 FurnacesNo. 6 and 7 If 160 inchPlate Mill I & 

### 0 

### FurnacesNo.4andfor 5, orboth,are in operation on a fuel other than natural gas, Furnaces No. 6 and 7 shall not operate or shall bum natural gas only. txv} (xiv) 160inchPlate Mill

### I & 

### 0 

### Furnace 1.78 160 No.8**~** 

### (xv) Power StationBoilersNo. 7 0.8 520 txvtt)-(xvi) Power Station Boilers No. 8, 9, 1.45 total 2,500 total 10, 11, and 12 (xviii)BethlehemSteel

### (xvii) ArcelorMittalBurnsHarborLLCshallnotifythe department at leasttwenty-four (24) hourspriorto reliance onthe alternative set of limits specified in items (i) through**~** 

### Bethlehem Steel 

### (xvi). ArcelorMittal Burns Harbor LLC shall maintain records offuel type and operational status offacilities listed in items (xii) and (xiii) and (xiv) 

### and shall make the records available to the departmentuponrequest.**~** 

### (xviii) For the purposes of 326 lAC 7-2-1(c)(2), compliance shall be determinedbasedonseparatecalendarmonthaveragesforthe setofrequirements specified in this clause and for the set ofrequirements specifiedin clause (B). (D) Coke oven gas usage at facilities other than the No. 1 and 2 Coke Battery Underfire Stacks shall be restricted to no notmore than seventy-five (75) million cubic feetperday. Total sulfurdioxide emissions from the facilities listedinclause (B)(i)through(D)(i\1), (B)(vii)(AA)thtough(D)(\Iii)(DB), (B)(viii) throttgh(D)(xi) 

### (B)(iii), (B)(vi)(AA) through (B)(vi)(BB), (B)(vii) through (B)(x), and (D)(xiii) through (B)(xvii) 

### (B)(xii) through (B)(xvi) shall not exceed four thousand four hundred twenty-nine (4,429) pounds perhour. During periods in which the limits containedin clause (C) are ineffect, coke ovengas usage at facilities otherthanthe No. 1 and 2 Coke Battery Underfire Stacks shallberestrictedto no

### notmore than seventy (70) million cubic feetperday, andtotal sulfur dioxide emissions from the facilities listedinclause (C)(i) through (C)(iv), (C)(vii)(AA) through (C)(vii)(DD) (C)(viii) through (C)(xi) 

### (C)(iii), (C)(vi)(AA) through (C)(vi)(BB), (C)(vii) through (C)(x), and (C)(xiii)tlnough(C)(xvii) 

### (C)(xii)through (C)(xvi) shallnot exceed fourthousand six hundred thirty ( 4,630) poundsperhour. (E)BethlehemSteel

### ArcelorMittal BurnsHarborLLC shallachievecompliance with the requirements specified in clause (B) or (C) prior to December 31, 1988. Thereafter, Bethlehem Steel 

### ArcelorMittal Burns Harbor LLC shall submit a reportto the departmentwithinthirty (30) days following the end ofeach calendar quarter containing the following information:
10 

# .!

# •

',.; 

# •

• Rap#07-88 ISG BurnsHarbor July 1, 2009 

### (i)Records ofthetotal coke ovengas,blastfurnace gas, fuel oil, andnatural gasusage for each day ateach facility listedinclauses (B)through and (C). (ii)Records ofthe: (AA) average sulfurcontentandheatingvalue as determinedperthe procedures specifiedin clause (F) for each fuel typeused duringthe calendarquarter; and'Ofthe- (BB) maximumnumberofslabmill soakingpitsburning coke oven gas at anygiven time during each day. (iii) The calculated sulfur dioxide emission rate in the applicable emission units (pounds perhour, poundspermillion Btu, andforpounds perton) for eachfacility for eachday andthe average sulfurdioxide emissions from the facilities listed in clause (C)(i) through (C)(iv), (C)(vii)(AA) throttgh (C)(vii)(DD),**(C)~iii)** 

### tlnottgh (C)(xi) (C)(iii), (C)(vi)(AA) through (C)(vi)(BB), (C)( 

### vii)through(C)(x),and(C)(xiii)through(C)(xvii) (C)(xii) through (C)(xvi) for each day in pounds per hour during the calendar quarter. (F) Bethlehem SteelArcelorMittal BurnsHarborLLC shall submita sampling andanalysisprotocol to the departmentbyDecember31, 1988. Theprotocol shall: · (i) contain a description ofplanned procedures for: (AA) sampling ofsulfur-bearing fuels andmaterials; ;-for- 

### (BB) analysis ofthe sulfurcontent; andfor (CC) any planned direct measurement ofsulfur dioxide emissions ventedto the atmosphere; The

### protocol shall and (ii) specifythefrequencyofsampling,analysis,andforandmeasurementfor each: (AA) fuel andmaterial; and for eaclt 

### (BB) facility. The department shall incorporate the protocol into the source's operation permit per procedures specifiedin326lAC2. Thedepartmentmayrevisetheprotocol asnecessaryto establishacceptablesampling,analysis,andforandmeasurementsproceduresandfrequency. The departmentmay also require that a source conduct a stack test at any facility listed in this subdivision within thirty (30) days ofwritten notificationbythe department. · (2) Northern Indiana Public Service Company Bailly Station shall comply with the following: Emission Limitations Facility Description lbs./MMBtu (A) Boilers 7 and 8 6.0 each Boilers 7 and 8 shall be fired with coal, fuel oil, ornatural gas. (B) Gas Turbine 10 natural gas only (3) Midwest Steel shall complywiththefollowing:

11Rap #07-88 ISG BumsHarbor July 1, 2009 

### Emission Limitations FacilityDescription lbs./MMBtu BabcockandWilcox Boiler 1andErie CityBoilersNo. 1,1.33 each 2, and 3 Onlytwo (2) offour(4)boilersmayburnfuel oilwitha sulfurdioxide emissionrate greater thanthree-tenths(0.3)poundspermillionBtuatthesametime. MidwestSteelshallmaintain records offuel type for each boiler for each hour. Therecords offuel type shall be made available to the department upon request. (4) AirProducts and Chemical shall complywith the following: 

### Facility Description Emission Limitations All boilers and theNo. 3Hydrogen Reformer natural gas only (AirPollution ControlBoard; 326lAC 7-4-14;filedAug28, 1990, 4:50p.m.: 14IR 78; readopted filedJan 10, 2001, 3:20p.m.: 24IR 1477; errata filedDec 12, 2002, 3:35p.m.: 26IR 1568)

12 

# .)

# •

•

/



# • Indiana Register 

# EXHIBIT 1-B

TITLE 326 AIR POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD 

### Proposed Rule LSA Document #07-88
DIGEST
Amends 326 lAC 6-6-5 and 326 lAC 7-4-14 concerning operations at ArcelorMittal Burns Harbor LLC. NOTE: Under IC 13-14-9-11. LSA Document #07-88, postedat20071031-/R-326070088PRA. was resubmitted for publication. Effective 30 days afterfiling with the Publisher.
HISTORY

. First Notice: February 21, 2007, Indiana Register (DIN: 2d070221-IR-326070088FNA). Second Notice: August 8, 2007, Indiana Register (DIN: 20070808-IR-326070088SNA). Notice of First Hearing: August 8, 2007, Indiana Register (DIN: 20070808-IR-326070088PHA). Date of First Hearing: October 3, 2007. Proposed Rule: October 31, 2007, Indiana Register (DIN: 20071031-IR-326070088PRA). Notice ofSecond Hearing: October 31, 2007, Indiana Register (DIN: 20071031-IR-326070088PHA). Change in Notice of Public Hearing: January 16,2008, Indiana Register (DIN: 20080116-IR-326070088CHA). Change in Notice of Public Hearing: December 3, 2008, Indiana Register (DIN: 20081203-IR-326070088CHA). Change in Notice of Public Hearing: February 25, 2009, Indiana Register (DIN: 20090225-IR-326070088CHA). Date ofSecond Hearing: April 1, 2009. REQUEST FOR PUBLIC COMMENTS The proposed (preliminarily adopted) rule is substantively different from the proposed rule published on October31, 2007, at 20071031-IR-326070088PRA. The Indiana Department of Environmental Management (IDEM) is requesting comment on the entire proposed (preliminarily adopted) rule. These comments and the department's responses thereto will be presented to the board for its consideration at final adoption under IC 13- 14-9-6. Mailed comments should be addressed to: #07-88 ArcelorMittal BH LLC Amy Smith Mail Code 61-49 c/o Administrative Assistant Rule Development Branch Office of Legal Counsel Indiana Department of Environmental Management 100 North Senate Avenue Indianapolis, Indiana 46204 Hand delivered comments will be accepted bythe receptionist on duty atthe Office of Legal Counsel, Thirteenth Floor East, 100 North Senate Avenue, Indianapolis, Indiana. Comments may also be submitted by facsimile to (317) 233-5517, Monday through Friday, between 8:15a.m. and 4:45p.m. Please confirm the timely receipt of faxed comments by calling the Rule Development Section at (317) 233-8903.
COMMENT PERIOD DEADLINE Comments must be postmarked, faxed, or hand delivered by June 12, 2009.
SUMMARY/RESPONSE TO COMMENTS RECEIVED AT THE SECOND PUBLIC HEARING On April1, 2009, the Air Pollution Control Board (board) conducted the second public hearing/board meeting concerning the development ofamendments to 326 lAC 6-6-5 and 326 lAC 7-4-14. Comments were made bythe following parties: Janet McCabe, Improving Kids Environment (IKE) Following is a summary ofthe comments received and IDEM's responses thereto: Comments: It is hard to tell what are the additional changes to the proposed rule. To the extent that the department acknowledges that the changes are not a logical outgrowth, it suggests that the changes are significant. The fact sheet says that the changes allow greaterflexibility but does not provide additional explanation ofthe changes. I do agree with the overall approach ofthe rulemaking, where it is betterto have a company submit a plan for approval to control fugitive dust ratherthan spelling out every detail in the rule, which is how the rule was originallywritten. However, I do have some questions about some ofthe changes the department is suggesting. The new

Date: Jun 09,2009 3:18:33PM EDT DIN: 20090513-IR-326070088PRA Page 1Indiana Register proposed rule presented today changes the definition ofopen aggregate pile. In the original rule (first proposed rule) the definition included a variety of different types of materials. In the proposed rule before the board today, it is just limited to coal. I am curious why the other materials are no longer included in the fugitive dust control plan? The proposed rule also seems to limit the types of locations ofthe plant that will be covered by the fugitive dust control plan to coal piles and paved and unpaved roads. The previous proposed rule included areas around piles, parking lots, areas where material is transferred or conveyed from one place to another, which is an area where fugitive dust could be generated. I would like to know why these areas are no longer to be covered by the fugitive dust control plan? It appears that steel mills often have contractors, separate from the steel mill itself, that work and conduct various operations on their property. In the proposed rule it does not appear that the areas forwhich the contractors are responsible are covered in the fugitive dust control plan, is that correct? I look forward to hearing from the department and discussing the changes in the proposed rule and what the impact will be on the creation or reduction offugitive dust on the property. (IKE) Response: The company, currently known as ArcelorMittal Burns Harbor LLC (ArcelorMittal}, requested that IDEM amend the rule 326 lAC 6-6-5, Bethlehem Steel Corporation fugitive dust control strategy. This rule was originally developed in 1988 as a nontraditional fugitive dust control plan for the faciljty. The existing rule language at 326 lAC 6-6-5 contains explicit prescriptive measures to control fugitive dust at the facility for paved roads, unpaved roads, and lowvolatile coal storage piles. ArcelorMittal requested the rule change because the specific control measures required by the rule were no longerthe most efficient or effective methods for controlling the fugitive emissions from the roadways and coal piles at the facility. ArcelorMittal wanted to implement more efficient dust control practices forthe fugitive dust emission points in the existing rule (paved roads, unpaved roads, and coal piles) while providing the opportunity forflexibility in the future by removing the prescriptive language in 326 lAC 6-6-5 and submitting to IDEM a fugitive dust control plan modeled after the requirements for fugitive dust control plans in 326 lAC 6-5. The draft rule language in the Second Notice of Comment Period was a full text incorporation of nearly all the language for fugitive dust control plans from 326 lAC 6-5. Following preliminary adoption ofthe draft rule at an Air Pollution Control Board hearing on October 31, 2007, ArcelorMittal requested that IDEM amend the proposed rule language. ArcelorMittal objected to the inclusion ofemission points and control measures forwhich they are not responsible underthe existing 326 lAC 6-6-5. ArcelorMittal is not required to control fugitive dustfrom all the emission points that were listed in the previous proposed rule (piles, parking lots, areas where material is transferred or conveyed from one place to another, etc) and ArcelorMittal is not subject to the applicability of 326 lAC 6-5. ArcelorMittal is not responsible for those areas in the existing rule and any rule amendments should not enlarge ArcelorMittal's responsibilities for providing fugitive dust control for those areas. Following ArcelorMittal's clarification oftheir request for amendments to the proposed rule language, IDEM amended the proposed rule to ensure that the scope ofthe proposed rule language at 326 lAC 6-6-5 is consistent with the existing rule language at 326 lAC 6-6-5. The following changes were made to the original proposed rule to ensure that the scope ofArcelorMittal's fugitive dust control plan does not enlarge ArcelorMittal's existing requirements to control fugitive dust from paved roads, unpaved roads and coal piles: 1. Amended the definition ofopen aggregate pile to include only coal because ArcelorMittal is not responsible under the existing rule forthe additional materials (slag, sand, gravel, and stone). 2. Removed from subsection (c) and (d) all emission points and control measures except those for which ArcelorMittal is currently required to control underthe existing rule at 326 lAC 6-6-5. IDEM is not requiring ArcelorMittal to expand their fugitive particulate matter control plan to include those areas on their property that contractors currently manage. ArcelorMittal is not responsible for controlling fugitive dust from those areas underthe existing rule language and is not required to control those areas underthe revised 326 lAC 6-6-5 rule language. IDEM is not expanding the scope ofArcelorMittal's fugitive dust control responsibilities in this rulemaking. The portion ofthe rulemaking dealing with fugitive dust is simply amending the process in which ArcelorMittal may request changes to their existing fugitive dust control responsibilities. The amendments will permit ArcelorMittal to submit a plan for controlling fugitive dust for IDEM approval that is no less stringentthan their existing requirements. The existing language in 326 lAC 6-6-5 does not allow ArcelorMittal to update or modify their fugitive dust control strategy without completing an amendment to the rule language. The amendments to 326 lAC 6-6-5 allowArcelorMittal to submit for review and approval to the department a fugitive dust control plan for the paved roads, unpaved roads, and coal piles, rather than have the prescribed measures for controlling fugitive dust from those areas stated explicitly in the rule language. This rulemaking should provide ArcelorMittal with the flexibility that they requested. This rulemaking is neither a relaxation nor a strengthening ofArcelorMittal's fugitive dust control requirements under 326 lAC 6-6-5. IDEM does not expect any additional fugitive dustemissions from the ArcelorMittal facility as a result ofthese changes to the proposed rule. This rulemaking is amending the rule language to provide ArcelorMittal the opportunity to submit a fugitive dust control plan rather than have a prescribed fugitive dust control strategy explicitly stated in

Date: Jun 09,2009 3:18:33PM EDT DIN: 20090513-IR-326070088PRA Page2 

# .)

# •

• Indiana Register rule language. 

### Small Business Assistance Information IDEM established a compliance and technical assistance (CTAP) program under IC 13-28-3. The program provides assistance to small businesses and information regarding compliance with environmental regulations. In accordance with IC 13-28-3 and IC 13-28-5, there is a small business assistance program ombudsman to provide a point ofcontact for small businesses affected by environmental regulations. Information on the CTAP program, the monthly CT AP newsletter, and other resources available can be found at: http://www.in.gov/idem/4108.htm Small businesses affected bythis rulemaking may contact the Small Business Regulatory Coordinator:

Alison Surface IDEM Compliance and Technical Assistance Program- OPPTA MC 60-04 IGCS W041 100 North Senate Avenue Indianapolis, IN 46204-2251 (317) 232-8172 or (800) 988-7901 ctap@idem.in.gov The SmallBusiness Assistance Program Ombudsman is: Brad Baughn IDEM Small Business Assistance Program Ombudsman MC 50-01

- IGCN 1307 100 North Senate Avenue Indianapolis, IN 46204-2251 (317) 234-3386 bbaughn@idem.in.gov


### 3261AC 6-6-5; 326 lAC 7-4-14
SECTION 1. 326 lAC 6-6-5 IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:


### 326 lAC 6-6-5 ArcelorMittal Burns Harbor LLC fugitive particulate matter emission control plan : Authority: IC 13-14-8; IC 13-17 Affected: IC 4-21.5; IC 13-11-2-205; IC 13-15

Sec. 5. (a) In orderto implement its nontraditional fugiti•v'e dust control program, Bethlehem shall purchase a high pressure water flushing trucl< and a tractor sweeper with broom and install a 'Nater filling station forthe flusher trucl< and a tanl< forthe storage and dispensing of liquid chemical dust retaFdant. The following control measures shall then be implemented atthe Burns Harbor Plant at the specified frequency. (1) A total oft\\'Cnty four (24) miles ofpaved and unpa·.·ed roads as shovm in Figure 1 shall be controlled as dessribed below: (A) A total of 12.7 miles of paved roads shall be cleaned three (3) times perwool< bywaterwashing using a flushertrucl< except as indicated in subsection (a)(4) ofthis section. In addition, at least twice per wool<, 7.0 miles ofthese roads in the primary facilities area will also be wet swept using a tractor mounted broom following the flushertrucl<. Road shoulders on the 12.7 miles ofpaved roads will be graded as required and treated with a cheA'Iical dust retardant at the saA'!e frequensy specified below for unpaved roads. 1\ocumulated material on road shoulders will be removed at least once per month. (8)A total of 11.3 miles ofunpa·red roads shall be controlled. This will consist offorA'Iing a uniform road surface by road grading to reffiO'rO large material, and the application ofa PNO (2) to four (4) inch layer of fine slag where necessary. Surfaees shall be sprayed with dust suppressant solution at an application rate consistent with the manufacturer's recofflmendations. The dust suppressant material and application rate shall be such that a crust 

### ·will be formed on the road surface that is amenable to cleaning 'ria flushing and sweeping. Road surfaces shall be cleaned t'.vice perwool< ·.vith a flusher trucl< followed by a tractor mounted broom. Road surfaces shall be resprayed ·.vith chemical dust suppressant as necessary to maintain a cleanable surface. The solution strength and application rate 

### will be determined priorto application based upon the condition ofthe surfaces. (2) Bethlehem shall control its lo•t't' •volatile coal storage piles by spraying theffl at least once per wool< with a chemical dust retardant. (3) Records ofall fugiti•re dust control activities shall be maintained. At a A'linimuA'I, records shall contain the following inforA'Iation: (/\) number ofmiles and location ofthe paved roads cleaned;

Date: Jun 09,2009 3:18:33PM EDT DIN:·20090513-IR-326.070088PRA Page 3Indiana Register (8) number of miles of unpaved roads 'v'v'hich were treated including the type, quantity, and dilution ratio of dust retardant used; (G) the type, quantity, and dilution ratio ofdust retardant sprayed on lmv •,colatile coal storage piles. This information shall be summarized into progress reports and submitted to the board quarterly. (4) This nontraditional fugitive dust control program can be adjusted on a daily basis as needed to talm into account preceding day and forecasted meteorological conditions (for mmmple, rainfall and temperature), and 't'isual observations ofthe roadways scheduled to be cleaned. · (b) Bethlehem Steel Corporation nontraditional fugitive dust control roads is shown as follows (Figure 1):



### (a) ArcelorMittal Burns Harbor LLC shall submit a fugitive particulate matteremission control plan for the Burns Harbor Plant (Plant ID 127-00001) located at U.S. Highway 12 meetingthe requirements ofthis section to the departmentwithin three (3) months afterthe effective date ofthis rule, notwithstanding section 3 ofthis rule. The plan shall be in accordance with and subjectto the following requirements: (1) 326 lAC 6-4-6. (2) Emission factors and control efficiencies in 3261AC 6-5-1(d)(1) through 3261AC 6-5-1(d)(3). (3) ArcelorMittal Burns Harbor LLC may petition the commissionerto use emission factors and control efficiencies otherthan those referenced in subdivision (2) ifadequate support documentation is submitted demonstrating that the submitted emission factors and control efficiencies provide equivalent protection for human health and the environment.
(b) The following definitions applythroughoutthis section: (1) "As needed basis" means the frequency ofapplication necessary to minimize visible particulate matter emissions as defined in the control plan. (2) "Fugitive particulate matteremissions" means particulate matterthat is emitted from anysource by means otherthan through a stack. (3) "Open aggregate pile" means the unenclosed storage ofcoal, which is finerthan two hundred (200) mesh size equal to or greaterthan one percent (1%) by weight. Open aggregate material mesh size shall be determined bythe "American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials Test Method T27-74"*, or other procedures equivalent in reliability as approved bythe commissioner.

Date: Jun 09,2009 3:18:33PM EDT DIN: 20090513-IR-326070088PRA Page4 

# .)

# -· ./



# • Indiana Register 

### (4) "Paved road" means any asphalt or concrete surfaced thoroughfare or right-of-way:

(A) designed or used for vehicular traffic; and (B) located on the property of, or owned by, ArcelorMittal Burns Harbor llC. (5) "Potential emissions" means fugitive particulate matter emissions calculated afterthe application ofair pollution control: (A) measures; or (B) equipment. (6) "RACM" means reasonably available control measure. (7) "Unpaved roads" means any surfaced thoroughfare or right-of-way, otherthan a paved road as defined in subdivision 

### (4), that is: (A) designed or used forvehiculartraffic; and (B) located on the property of, or owned by, ArcelorMittal Burns Harbor llC.
(c) The contents and record keeping requirements forthe fugitive particulate matter emissions control plan are as follows: (1) The control plan shall be in writing and include, at a minimum, the following information:

(A) The name and address ofthe owner or operator responsible for the implementation ofthe control plan. (B) Identification ofall:

(i) open aggregate pile areas; (ii) paved roads; and (iii) unpaved roads; that have the potential to emit fugitive particulate matter emissions in accordance with subsection 

### (d). (C) A map ofthe ArcelorMittal Burns Harbor LLC propertyshowing the following:

(i) Open aggregate pile areas. (ii) Access areas around the open aggregate piles. 

### (iii) Unpaved roads. (iv) Paved roads. (D) The quantity and types ofvehicular activity occurring on the following:

(i) Paved roads. 

### (ii) Unpaved roads. , (E) Quantity ofopen aggregate piles that have the potential to emit fugitive particulate matter emissions. (F) The equipment used to maintain open aggregate piles. (G) A description ofthe control measures to be implementedto control fugitive particulate matter emissions resulting from potential emission points identified in clause (8). (H) A specification ofthe dust suppressant materialthat will be used, such as oil orchemical, including the estimated frequency and rates ofapplication, rates, and concentrations ofthe dust suppressant. (I) A specification ofthe particulate mattercollection equipmentthatwill be used as a fugitive particulate matter emission control measure. (J) 

### A schedule ofcompliance with the provisions ofthe control plan. The schedule shall specifythe amount oftime the source requires to:

(i) award any necessary contracts; and (ii) commence and complete construction, installation, or modification ofthe fugitive particulate matteremission control measures. (K) Other relevant data that may be requested bythe commissioner to evaluate the effectiveness of the control plan. (2) Records that document all control measures and activities to be implemented in accordance with the approved control plan shall be: (A) kept and maintained atArcelorMittal Burns Harbor LLC; (8) retained for at leastfive (5) years; and (C) made available upon the request ofthe commissioner.
(d) All control measures specified in this subsection shall be conside'"ed RACM. The frequency of application for all control measures shall be detailed in the control plan. No control plan shall contain control measures thatviolate the applicable provisions ofstate statutes or rules. Fugitive particulate matter emissions from the emission points specified in this section shall be controlled as follows: (1) Paved roads and unpaved roads as follows:

Date: Jun 09,2009 3:18:33PM EDT DIN: 20090513-IR-326070088PRA Page 5

### Indiana Register 

### (A) Paved roads bythe use ofone (1) or more ofthe following measures:

(i) Cleaning by vacuum sweeping. 

### (ii) Flushing. (iii)

### An alternate RACM that is equivalent in effectiveness to either item (i) or (ii). (B) Unpaved roads, by the use of one (1) or more ofthe following measures:

(i) Paving with a material such as asphalt or concrete. (ii) Treating with a suitable and effective commercially available petroleum based dustsuppressant orwater based dustsuppressant. The frequency of application shall be on an as needed basis. (iii) Spraying with water. The frequency ofapplication shall be on an as needed basis. (iv) Double chip and seal the road surface and maintain on an as needed basis. (v) An alternate RACM that is equivalent in effectiveness to one (1) or more ofthe above measures

.

.(2) Open aggregate piles bythe use ofone (1) or more ofthe following measures: · (A) Cleaning the area around the perimeter ofthe aggregate piles. (B) Applying a suitable and effective oil or other dustsuppressant on an as needed basis. (C) An alternate RACM that is equivalent in effectiveness to one (1) or more ofthe above measures. (e) The approval ofthe control plan shall be in accordance with the following: (1) Within three (3) months of receiving a control plan, the commissionershall notifyArcelorMittal Burns Harbor LLC of:

(A) the approval ofthe control plan; (B) modifications thatthe commissioner deems necessaryto the control plan; or (C) disapproval ofthe control plan. (2) Ifthe commissionerfinds a control plan to be incomplete, ArcelorMittal Burns Harbor LLC shall provide the commissionerwith the required additional information. (3) In determining ifan alternate control measure represents a RACM as specified in this section, ArcelorMittal Burns Harbor LLC shall submit and the commissionershall consider information pertaining to factors, including, but not limited to, the following:

(A) The impact on the environment interms ofany increase in water, air, orsolid waste pollution emissions. (B) The energy requirements ofthe selected control measure. (C) The:

(i) capital expenditure; (ii) impact on production; and (iii) operating costs; to implementthe selected control measure. (D) The impact ofthese costs. (4) Ifa control plan is disapproved bythe commissioner, ArcelorMittal Burns Harbor LLC shall have up to thirty (30) days from the date of receipt ofthe disapproval letterto request, in writing, a hearing on the matter. In the event a hearing is requested: (A) itshall be held in accordance with the requirements setforth in IC 4-21.5; and (B) the burden of proofshall liewith ArcelorMittal Burns Harbor LLC to demonstrate whythe control plan is appropriate. (5) The control plan approved bythe commissionershall become part ofArcelorMittal Burns Harbor LLC's operating permit. (6) Changes may be made to the control plan without reopening the operating permit by submitting a revised control plan to the commissionerfor approval in accordance with this subsection.

- --- 

### (f) The control plan shall be updated atthe time of reapplication forthe source's operating permit or as required in 326 lAC 2.

*These documents are incorporated by reference. The documents are available for review and copying atthe Indiana Department of Environmental Management, Office ofAirQuality, Indiana Government Center North, Tenth Floor, 100 North Senate Avenue, Indianapolis, Indiana 46204. (AirPollution ControlBoard; 3261AC 6-6-5: filed Mar 10, 1988, 1:20p.m.: 111R 2510; readopted filedJan 10, 2001, 3:20p.m.: 241R 1477)

SECTION 2. 3261AC 7-4-141S AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:

Date: Jun 09,2009 3:18:33PM EDT DIN: 20090513-IR-326070088PRA Page6 

# .)

# •

I



# •

• Indiana Register 326 lAC 7-4-14 Porter County sulfur dioxide emission limitations Authority: IC 13-14-8; IC 13-17 Affected: JC 13-15

Sec. 14. The following sources and facilities located in Porter County shall comply with the sulfur dioxide emission limitations in pounds per million Btu (lbs/MMBtu) and pounds per hour (lbs/hr), unless otherwise specified, and other requirements: (1) Bethlehem Steel ArcelorMittal Burns**Harbor~** 

### LLC shall complywith the following:

(A) The following facilities shall burn natural gas only:

(i) BOF Shop FM Boiler. (ii) 160 inch Plate Mill Continuous Hardening and Annealing Heat Treatment Furnace. (iii) 160 inch Plate Mill Boilers No. 2 and 4. · (iv) Batch Annealing Furnaces (24). (v} Continuous Heat Treat Line- Preheat, Heating and Soaking, and Reheat. (B) The following facilities shall comply with the sulfur dioxide emission limitations and other requirements:

Facility Description (i) Blast Furnace C Stoves (ii) Blast Furnace D Stoves (iii) Blast Furnace Flare 

## M (iii) Sinter Plant Windbox 

## M (iv) No. 1 Coke Battery Underfire 

### fvtj (v) No. 2 Coke Battery Underfire 

## friB (vi) Slab Mill Soaking Pits: Emission Limitations lbs/MMBtu 0.83 0.83 

### M7 lbs/hr 545 545
1.0 pound per ton process material 400 1.73 803 1.96 911 (AA) 

### N& Not more than nine (9) ofthirty-two (32) horizontally discharged soaking pits may he fired on coke oven gas atthe same time with total sulfur dioxide emissions not to exceed four hundrea eighty-two (482) pounds per hour. , (BB) The remaining twenty-three (23) ofthirty-two (32) horizontally discharged soaking pits may burn blast furnace 

### aREiter or natural gas, or both, with total sulfur dioxide emissions not to exceed twenty-four (24) pounds per hour. (CC) The four (4) vertically discharged soaking pits may burn blast furnace 

### aREiter or natural gas, or both, with total sulfur dioxide emissions notto exceed four (4) pounds per hour. 

## f¥iH1 (vii) 160 inch Plate Mill Continuous Reheat Furnace 1.96 No. 1 and Boiler No. 1 299**~** 

### (viii) 160 inch Plate Mill Continuous Reheat Furnace 1.96 299 No. 2 and Boiler No. 3 

## W (ix) 80 inch Hot Strip Mill Furnace No. 1 ,2, and 3 1.96 79 each**~** 

### (x) 110 inch Plate Mill Furnaces No. 1 and 2 1.96 441**~** 

### (xi) 110 inch Plate Mill Normalizing Furnace 1.07 88**~** 

### (xii) 160 inch Plate Mill I & 

### 0 Furnaces No.4 and 5 1.96 274**~** 

### (xiii) 160 inch Plate Mill I & 

### 0 Furnaces No. 6 and 7 1.96 274**~** 

### (xiv) 160 inch Plate Mill I 

### & 0 Furnace No. 8 1.96 176**~** 

### (xv) Power Station Boiler No. 7 0.8 520**~** 

### (xvi) Power Station Boilers No. 8, 9, 10, 11, and 12 1.45 2,798 (C) As an alternative to the sulfur dioxide emission limitations specified in clause (B), Bethlehem Steel ArcelorMittal Burns Harbor LLC shall comply with the sulfur dioxide emission limitations and other requirements as follows: Emission Limitations

Facility Description (i) Blast Furnace C Stoves (ii) Blast Furnace D Stoves (iii) Blast Furnace Flare lbs/MMBtu 0.75 0.75 lbs/hr 498 498 

## M (iii) Sinter Plant Windbox 

## M (iv) No. 1 Coke Battery Underfire 

### fvtj (v) No. 2 Coke Battery Underfire 

### £viH (vi) Slab Mill Soaking Pits: 

### M7 1.0 pound perton process material 400 1.57 730 1.78 828

Date: Jun 09,2009 3:18:33PM EDT DIN: 20090513-IR-326070088PRA Page 7Indiana Register 

### (AA) Ne Not more than six (6) ofthirty-two (32) horizontally discharged soaking pits may be fired on coke oven gas at the same time with total sulfur dioxide emissions not to exceed two hundred ninety-two (292) pounds per hour. (BB) The remaining twenty-six (26) ofthirty-two (32) horizontally discharged soaking pits may burn blast furnace 

### aA€IIeF or natural gas, or both, with total sulfur dioxide emissions notto exceed twenty-seven (27) pounds per hour. (CC) The four (4) vertically discharged soaking pits may burn blast furnace 

### aA€IIeFor natural gas, or both,· with total sulfur dioxide emissions notto exceed four (4) pounds per hour. 

### fvili1 (vii) 160 inch Plate Mill Continuous Reheat Furnace 1.78 293 No. 1 and Boiler No. 1**~** (viii) 160 inch Plate Mill Continuous Reheat Furnace 1.78 293 No. 2 and Boiler No. 3

. 

## W (ix) 80 inch Hot Strip Mill Furnace No. 1, 2, and 3 1.78 483 each 

## M (x) 110 inch Plate Mill Furnaces No. 1 and 2 1.78 401 

### f*H1 (xi) 110 inch Plate Mill Normalizing Furnace 1.07 88**~** (xii) 160 inch Plate Mill I & 

### 0 Furnaces No.4 and 5 1.78 249 If 160 inch Plate Mill I & 

### 0 Furnaces No.6

### aR€1/eF or7, or both, are in operation on a fuel otherthan natural gas, Furnaces No.4 arid 5 shall not operate or shall burn natural gas only.**~** (xiii) 160 inch Plate Mill I & 

### 0 Furnaces No. 6 and 7 1.78 249 If 160 inch,Plate Mill I & 

### 0 Furnaces No. 4 

### aR€1/eF or 5, or both, are in operation on a fuel otherthan natural gas, Furnaces No.6 and 7 shall notoperate or shall burn natural gas only.**~** (xiv) 160 inch Plate Mill I & 

### 0 Furnace No.8 1.78 160 

### (*Yi1 (xv) Power Station Boilers No. 7 0.8 520**~** (xvi) Power Station Boilers No. 8, 9, 10, 11, and 12 1.45total 2,500 total (xviii) Bethlehem Steel (xvii) ArcelorMittal Burns Harbor LLC shall notify the department at least

.twenty-four (24) hours priorto reliance on the alternative set of limits specified in items (i) through**~** Bethlehem Steel (xvi). ArcelorMittal Burns Harbor LLC shall maintain records offuel type and operational status offacilities listed in items (xii) and (xiii) ami (Jciv) and shall make the records available to the department upon request.**~** (xviii) Forthe purposes of326 lAC 7-2-1(c)(2), compliance shall be determined based on separate calendar month averages for the set of requirements specified in this clause and forthe set of requirements specified in clause (B). (D) Coke oven gas usage at facilities otherthan the No. 1 and 2 Coke Battery Underfire Stacks shall be restricted toRe not more than seventy-five (75) million cubic feet per day. Total sulfur dioxide emissions from the facilities listed in clause (B)(i) through (B)(iv),**(B)(vii)~'V\)** thFOugh (B}('Iii)(BB), (B)(viii) through**~** (B)(iii), (B)(vi)(AA) through (B)(vi)(BB), (B)(vii) through (B)(x), and (B)(><iii) thFeugh (B)(x-vii) (B)(xii) through (B)(xvi) shall not exceed four thousand four hundred twenty-nine (4,429) pounds per hour. During periods in which the limits contained in clause (C) are in effect, coke oven gas usage at facilities otherthan the No. 1 and 2 Coke Battery Underfire Stacks shall be restricted to Re not more than seventy (70) million cubic feet per day, and total sulfur dioxide emissions from the facilities listed in clause (C)(i) through (G)(iv), (G)(vii)(M) through (G)(vii)(BB), (G)('t<iii) threugh (G)(xi), (C)(iii), (C)(vi)(AA) through (C)(vi)(BB), (C)(vii) through (C)(x), and (G)(J<iii) through (G)(Jwii) (C)(xii) through (C)(xvi) shall not exceed four thousand six hundred thirty (4,630) pounds per hour. (E) Bethlehem Steel ArcelorMittal Burns Harbor LLCshall achieve compliance with the requirements specified in clause (B) or (C) prior to December 31, 1988. Thereafter, Bethlehem Steel ArcelorMittal Burns Harbor LLC shall submit a report to the department within thirty (30) days following the end ofeach calendar quarter containing the following information:

(i) Records ofthe total coke oven gas, blast furnace gas, fuel oil, and natural gas usage for each day at each facility listed in clauses (B) thFOugh and (C). (ii) Records ofthe:

(AA) average sulfur content and heating value as determined perthe procedures specified in clause (F) for each fuel type used during the calendar quarter; and 

### eHhe (BB) maximum number ofslab mill soaking pits burning coke oven gas at any given time during each day. (iii) The calculated sulfur dioxide emission rate in the applicable emission units (pounds per hour, pounds per million Btu, 

### aR€1/eF or pounds per ton) for each facility for each day and the average sulfur dioxide emissions from the facilities listed in clause (C)(i) through (G)(i'>'), (G)01ii)(/'J\) through (G)(vii)(BB), (G)('t•iii) through (G)(J<i), (C)(iii), (C)(vi)(AA) through (C)(vi)(BB), (C)(vii) through (C)(x), and (G)(J<iii) through (G)(Jfvii), (C)(xii) through (C)(xvi) for each day in pounds per hour during the calendar quarter. (F) Bethlehem Steel ArcelorMittal Burns Harbor LLC shall submit a sampling and analysis protocol to the department by December 31, 1988. The protocol shall:

Date: Jun 09,2009 3:18:33PM EDT DIN: 20090513-IR-326070088PRA Page 8

# •

• Indiana Register (i) contain a description of planned procedures for:



### (AA) sampling ofsulfur-bearing fuels and materials; 

### fef (BB) 

### analysis ofthe sulfur content; and 

### fef (CC) any planned direct measurement ofsulfur dioxide emissions vented to the atmosphere; The protocol sJ:\aH and (ii) 

### specify the frequency ofsampling, analysis, 

### aA€Iferand 

### measurement for each:



### (AA) fuel and material; and for each (BB) 

### facility. The department shall incorporate the protocol into the source's operation permit per procedures specified in 326 lAC 2. The department may revise the protocol as necessary to establish acceptable sampling, analysis, 6Atllor and 

### measurements procedures and frequency. The department may also require that a source conduct a stack test at any facility listed in this subdivision within thirty (30) days ofwritten notification by the department. (2) Northern Indiana Public Service Company Bailly Station shall comply with the following:



### Facility Description (A) Boilers 7 and 8 Boilers 7 and 8 shall be fired with coal, fuel oil, or natural gas. (B) Gas Turbine 10 (3) Midwest Steel shall comply with the following: 

### Emission Limitations lbs/MMBtu 6.0 each
natural gas only

Emission Limitations Facility Description lbs/MMBtu Babcock and Wilcox Boiler 1 and Erie City Boilers No. 1, 2, and 3 1.33 each Only two (2) offour (4) boilers may burn fuel oil with a sulfur dioxide emission rate greater than three-tenths (0.3) pounds per million Btu atthe same time. Midwest Steel shall maintain records offuel type for each boiler for each hour. The records offuel type shall be made available to the department upon request:·.·:, (4) Air Products and Chemical shall comply with the following:



### Facility Description All boilers and the No. 3 Hydrogen Reformer Emission Limitations ·. natural gas only (AirPollution ControlBoard; 3261AC 7-4-14: filedAug28, 1990, 4:50p.m.: 141R 78; readopted filedJan 10, 2001, 3:20p.m.: 241R 1477; errata filed Dec 12, 2002, 3:35p.m.: 261R 1568) ·

Notice of Public Hearing

Posted: 05/13/2009 byLegislative ServicesAgency An html version ofthis document.

Date: Jun 09,2009 3:18:33PM EDT DIN: 20090513-IR-326070088PRA Page 9

# .I

# • Indiana Register 

# EXHIBIT 1-C

TITLE 326 AIR POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD 

### Proposed Rule LSA Document #07-88
DIGEST
Amends 326 lAC 6-6-5 and 326 lAC 7-4-14 concerning operations at ISG Burns Harbor LLC. Effective 30 days after filing with the Publisher.
HISTORY First Notice: February 21, 2007, Indiana Register {DIN: 20070221-IR-326070088FNA). Second Notice: August 8, 2007, Indiana Register {DIN: 20070808-IR-326070088SNA). Notice of First Hearing: August 8, 2007, Indiana Register {DIN: 20070808-IR-326070088PHA). Date of First Hearing: October 3, 2007.
PUBLIC COMMENTS UNDER IC 13-14-9-4.5 IC 13-14-9-4.5 states that a board may not adopt a rule under IC 13-14-9 that is substantively different from the draft rule published under IC 13-14-9-4 until the board has conducted a third comment period that is at least 21 days long. Because this proposed rule is not substantively different from the draft rule published on August 8, 2007, at DIN: 20070808-IR-326070088SNA, the Indiana Department of Environmental Management {IDEM) is not requesting additional comment on this proposed rule.
SUMMARY/RESPONSE TO COMMENTS FROM THE SECOND COMMENT PERIOD The Indiana Department of Environmental Management {IDEM) requested public comment from August 8, 2007, through September 7, 2007, on IDEM's draft rule language. IDEM received comments from the following party: ISG Burns Harbor LLC {ISG) Following is a summary ofthe comments received and IDEM's responses thereto: Comment: We support the draft amendments to 326 lAC 6-6-5 "Bethlehem Steel Corporation fugitive dust control strategy". The amended rule will allow more flexibility to employ improved technologies on a schedule based on actual plant operations. The amount ofpaved and unpaved roads and their configurations have changed over the last 20 years, so that the map and mileage requirements of326 lAC 6-6-5 are no longer accurate. {ISG) ) Response: IDEM agrees that the draft amendments to 326 lAC 6-6-5 will provide more efficient use of resources and provide equivalent or improved fugitive particulate matter emission control. IDEM believes that the section ofthe draft rule amending 326 lAC 6-6-5 provides thorough guidance on howto address the potential fugitive particulate matter emissions, and that the draft amendments to 326 lAC 6-6-5 will result in a plan that is easier to modify as new technologies or business practices are introduced, and will also result in more efficient and less costlyfugitive particulate matter control strategies. Comment: We suggest that "Bethlehem Steel Corporation" and "Bethlehem" be deleted and replaced throughout 326 lAC 6-6-5 with "ISG Burns Harbor LLC". {ISG) Response: IDEM agrees, and has proposed the appropriate changes in this rulemaking. Comment: We support the draft amendment to 326 lAC 7-4-14 removing the S02 emission limit for the blast furnace gas flare. Removing the SO emission limit for the blast furnace gas flare will mcrease regulatory consistency, result in no increase in lhe actual emissions of S02 and no operational changes at ISG Burns Harbor LLC, result in no impact on modeled emissions, and will eliminate an outdated standard. {ISG) Comment: There is no S02 emission limit for the blast furnace gas flare at U.S. Steel Gary Works 

## m neighboring Lake County. Air quality modeling conducted for U.S. Steel GaryWorks accounted for the use of more blast furnace gas in the other combustion units than could be produced. IDEM agreed that including the blast furnace flares in the Lake County S02 attainment demonstration model was not appropriate when all potentially available blast furnace gas is accounted for in modeled emissions from other combustion units. Because ISG Burns Harbor's system for blast furnace gas combustion is identical to that used by GaryWorks, the S02 emission limit for the 326 lAC 7-4-14 blast furnace gas flare can be eliminated without affecting Porter County's demonstrated SO NAAQS attainment. {ISG) Comment: IDEM shouRJ eliminate the 326 lAC 7-4-14 blast furnace gas flare SO emission limit because the emission factor used to generate the emission limitation of 0.07 lb/MMBtu is

### inherent~ difficult to validate and has not been peer reviewed or incorporated in U.S. EPA's Compilation of Emission Factors. {ISG) Response: IDEM agrees that there will be no negative environmental impact on the ambient air quality with respect to S02 emissions as a result ofthis rulemaking. Air quality modeling performed to establish the 326 lAC

Date: Jun 09,2009 3:20:40PM EDT DIN: 20071031-IR-326070088PRA Page 1Indiana Register 

### 7-4-14 S02 emission limits for emission points atthe steelmaking plant attribute 

### 100% ofthe available blast furnace gas to being used in the blast furnace stoves, coke ovens, and the power station boilers. Compliance with the S02emission limits established for the processes using blast furnace gas assures protection ofthe National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS)for**S~.** regardless ofthe presence of an S02 emission limit for the blast furnace gas flare. IDEM acknowledges that Su2 emission limits are not imposed on flares for any other steelmaking operations orfor any otherflares in Indiana. IDEM agreesthat add-on control technologies do not currently existfor $02 emission control at blastfurnace gas flares, and that the blastfurnace gas flare is a necessary control device forthe safe operation ofthe blast furnace gas distribution system. IDEM further agrees that because the sulfur content present in raw materials processed at ISG Burns Harbor LLC's blastfurnaces is highlyvariable, and that the nature ofthe steelmaking process requires a continuous addition of raw materials to the blastfurnace, it is technically infeasible to manage the sulfur content ofthe materials charged ih the blast furnace to achieve compliance with the blastfurnace flare S02 emission limit. Forthese reasons, IDEM agrees that it is appropriate and necessary to remove the S02 emission limit for ISG Burns Harbor LLC's blast furnace gas flare from 

### 326 lAC 

### 7-4-14.
SUMMARY/RESPONSE TO COMMENTS RECEIVED AT THE FIRST PUBLIC HEARING On October 

### 3, 2007, the Air Pollution Control Board (board) conducted the first public hearing/board meeting concerning the development ofamendments to 

### 326 lAC 

### 6-6-5 and 

### 326 lAC 

### 7-4-14 concerning operations at ISG Burns Harbor LLC. No comments were made atthe first hearing.
326 lAC 6-6-5; 326 lAC 7-4-14
SECTION 

### 1. 326 lAC 

### 6-6-5 IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:
326 lAC 6-6-5 ISG Burns Harbor LLC fugitive particulate matteremission control plan Authority: IC 13-14-8; IC 13-17-3-4; IC 13-17-3-11; IC 13-17-3-12 Affected: IC 4-21.5; IC 13-11-2-205; IC 13-15; IC 13-17

Sec. 5. (a) lA oFder to iFFipleffieAt its AOAtraElitioAal fu§iti¥e Elust eoAtrol prograffi, Bethleheffi shall purchase a hi§h pressure waterflushiA§ truel( aAEl a tractor sweeperwith brooffi aAEl iAstall a waterfiliiA§ statioA for the flusher truel( aAEl a taAI( forthe stora§e aAEl ElispeAsiA§ of liEJuiEl eheffiieal ElustretarElaAt. The followiR§ eoAtrol ffieasures shall theA be iFFipleFFieAteEl attl=le BurAs Harbor PlaAt atthe speeifieEl frequeAey. (1) A total oftweAty four 

### (24) FFiiles ofpa•reel aAEl uApaved roaEls as sl=lo'lvA iA Figure 1 shall be ooAtrolleEl as desoribeEl below:



### (A)/\ total of 

### 12.7 FFiiles of pa•teEl roaEls sl=lall be eleaAeEl three (3) tiffies perweal( bywater washiA§ usiA§ a flushertrue!( mmept as iAElieated iA subseetioA (a)(4) ofthis seetioA. lA aElElitioA, at leasttwice perweeI(, 7.9 FFiiles ofthese roaEls iA the priFFIOF)' facilities area will also be wet swept usiA§ a tractor FFIOUAteEl brooffi followiAg the flushertruel(. Roael shouiElers oA tl=le 

### 12.7 FFiiles ofpaveEl roaEls will be graEleEl as reE)uireEl aAEl treateel witl=l a eheffiieal elust retarElaAt attl=le saffie freEJUCAey speeifieeleelow for uApaveel roads. AeeuFFiulateEl ffiaterial oA roaEl shouiElers will be reffio>v·eel at least oAee per FFIOAth. (B) A total of 11.3 FFiiles of uApa'l·eEl reaEls sl=lall be eoAtrolleel. Tl=lis will eoAsist offorFFiiA§ a uRiforFFI roaEl· surface by roaEl §raEliA§ to reFFIO'Ie lar§e FAaterial, aRE! the applieatioA of a two (2) to four (4) iAeh layer of fiRe sla§ wl=lere Aeeessary. Surfaces shall be sprayeEl •Nith elust suppressaAt solutioA at aR applieatioA rate eoAsisteAt witl=l tl=le FAaAufaeturer's reeoFAFAeAElatioAs. The elust suppressaAt FAaterial aAel applieatioA rate shall be such that a crust will be forFFieEl oA the roael surface that is aFAeAable to eleaAiR§ •1ia flushiA§ aAel s•n•eepiA§. RoaEl surfaces sl=lall be eleaAeEl twice perweel( with a flushertrue!( followeel by a tractor FAOUAteEl brooFA. Roael surfaces sl=lall be resprayeEl with eheFAieal elust suppressaAt as Accessory to FAaiRtaiA a oleaAable surface. Tl=le solutioA streA§th aAEl applieatioA rate 

### will be EleterFAiAeEl priorto applieatioA baseEl upoA the eoAElitioA ofthe surfaces. (2) Bethlel=leFA shall eoAtrol its low volatile coal storage piles by sprayiAg theFA at least oAee perwool< with a el=leFAieal Elust retarElaAt. (3) ReeorEls ofall fugitive Elust eoAtrol aeti•.·ities shall be FFIOiAtaiAeEl. At a FAiAiFAUFA, reeoFds sl=lall eoAtaiA tl=le foiiOWiA§ iAforFAatioA: (A) AUFFiber of FFiiles aAEllooatioA oftl=le paveEl roaEls eleaAeEl; (B) AUFFiber of FAiles of uRpaveEl roaels wl=liel=l were treateEl iAeluEliAg the type, quaAtity, aRE! elilutioA ratio of elust retarelaAt useel; (G) the type, quaAtity, aAEl ElilutioA ratio of Elust retarElaAt sprayeel oA lowvolatile coal storage piles. Tl=lis iAforFAatioA shall be suFAFFiari:z:eEl iAto pro§ress reports aAEl subFAitteEl to the boarel E)uarterly. (4) Tl=lis AOAtraelitioAal fugitive elust eoAtrol prO§FOFFI eaA be adjusteel oA a elaily basis as Reeeleel to tal(e iAto

Date: Jun 09,2009 3:20:40PM EDT DIN: 20071031-IR-326070088PRA Page 2

# •

)

# • Indiana Register aeoount preoeding day and forecasted meteorological conditions (for example, rainfall and temperature), and visual observations ofthe road'lrays soheduled to be cleaned.
(b) Bethlehem Steel Corporation nontraditional fugitive dust oontrol roads is shown as follows (l=igure 1):



# ....:

# . J.

(a) Effective November 17,2007, ISG Burns Harbor LLC shall implement an approved fugitive particulate matteremission control plan meetingthe requirements ofthis section. · (b) The following definitions applythroughoutthis section: (1) "As needed basis" means the frequency ofapplication necessaryto minimize visible particulate matter emissions as defined in the control plan. (2) "Fugitive particulate matteremissions" means particulate matterthat is emitted from any source by means otherthan through a stack. (3) "Open aggregate pile" means the unenclosed storage of material consisting of, but not limited to, slag produced duringthe manufacture of iron and steel, sand, gravel, stone, and coal, which is finer than two hundred (200) mesh size equal to orgreaterthan one percent (1 %) 

### by weight. Open aggregate material mesh size shall be determined bythe "American Association ofState Highway and Transportation Officials Test Method T27-74", or other equivalent procedures approved by the commissioner. (4) "Paved road" means any asphalt or concrete surfaced thoroughfare or right-of-way:

(A) designed or used forvehicular traffic; and (B) located on the property of, or owned by, an individual or company. (5) "Potential emissions" means fugitive particulate matteremissions calculated afterthe application ofairpollution control: (A) measures; or (B) equipment. (6) "Unpaved roads" means any surfaced thoroughfare or right-of-way, otherthan a paved road as defined in subdivision (4), that is: (A) designed or used for vehiculartraffic; and (B) located on the property of, or owned by, an individual or company.

Date: Jun 09,2009 3:20:40PM EDT DIN: 20071031-IR-326070088PRA Page 3

### Indiana Register
(c) ISG Burns Harbor LLC's fugitive particulate matter emission control plan shall be in writing and shall include, at a minimum, the following information: (1) The name and address ofthe owner or operator responsible forthe execution ofthe control plan. (2) Identification ofall:

(A) processes; (B) operations; and (C) areas; that have the potential to emit fugitive particulate matter. (3) A map ofthe source showing the following: (A) Aggregate pile areas. (B) Access areas around the aggregate piles. (C) Unpaved roads: (D) Paved roads. (E) Parking lots. (F) location ofconveyors and transfer points. (G) Other potential sources offugitive particulate matter. (4) The number and types ofvehicular activity occurring on the following: (A) Paved roads. · (B) Unpaved roads. (C) Parking lots. (5) The type and quantity of material handled. (6) The equipment used to maintain aggregate piles. (7) A description ofthe measures to be implemented to control fugitive particulate matteremissions resulting from emission points identified in subdivision (3). (8) A specification ofthe dust suppressant material, such as oil or chemical, includingthe estimated frequency ofapplication, rates, and concentrations ofthe dust suppressant. (9) A specification ofthe particulate matter collection equipment used as a fugitive particulate matter emission control measure. (10) A schedule ofcompliance with the provisions ofthe control plan. The schedule shall specifythe amount oftime the source requires to: (A) award any necessary contracts; and (B) commence and complete construction, installation, or modification ofthe fugitive particulate matteremission control measures. (11) Other relevant data that may be requested bythe commissionerto evaluate the effectiveness of the control plan.
(d) Records that document all control measures and activities to be implemented in accordance with the approved control plan shall be: (1) kept and maintained; (2) retained for at leastfive (5) years; and (3) made available upon the request ofthe commissioner.
(e) All control measures specified in this subsection shall be considered reasonably available control measures (RACM). The frequency ofapplication for all control measures shall be detailed in each control plan. No control plan shall contain control measures that violate the provisions ofstate statutes or rules. Fugitive particulate matteremissions from the emission points specified in this section shall be controlled as follows: (1) Paved roads, unpaved roads, marshaling yards, slab haul roads, slab and coil storage areas, designated beach iron dumping areas, blast furnace slag pit processing activities, iron and steel slag pot dumping areas, and parking lots as follows:

(A) Paved roads and paved parking lots bythe use ofone (1) or more ofthefollowing measures:

(i) Cleaning byvacuum sweeping. (ii) Flushing. (iii) An equivalent alternate measure. (B) Unpaved roads, marshaling yards, slab haul roads, slab and coil storage areas, designated beach iron dumping areas, blastfurnace slag pit processing activities, iron and steel slag pot dumping areas and unpaved parking lots bythe use ofone (1) or more ofthe following measures:

(i) Paving with a material such as asphalt or concrete. (ii) Treating with a suitable and effective commercially available petroleum based dust suppressant

Date: Jun 09,2009 3:20:40PM EDT DIN: 20071 031-IR-326070088PRA Page4 

# •

•

# •

)

# • Indiana Register


### orwater based dust suppressant approved bythe commissioner. The frequency ofapplication shall be on an as needed basis. 

### (iii) Spraying with water. The frequency ofapplication shall be on an as needed basis. (iv) Double chip and seal the road surface and maintain on an as needed basis. (v) An equivalent alternate measure. (2) Open aggregate piles bythe use ofone (1) or more ofthe following measures:

(A) Cleaning the area around the perimeter ofthe aggregate piles. (B) Applying a suitable and effective oil orother dust suppressant on an as needed basis. (C) An equivalent alternate measure. (3) Outdoorconveying of aggregate material, such as, but not limitedto, slag produced during the manufacture of iron and steel, sand, gravel, stone, and coal, by equipmentsuch as belt conveyors and bucket elevators, by the use ofone (1) or more ofthe following measures:

(A) Enclosing the conveyor belttotally on the top and sides as needed to minimize visible emissions and, if needed, exhausting emissions to particulate control equipment during operation ofconveyor. (B) Applying water orsuitable and effective chemical dust suppressant atthe feed point orat intermediate points, orat both, as needed to minimizevisible emissions. (C) An equivalentalternate measure. (4) Transferring of aggregate material 

### shall be controlled bythe use ofone (1) or more ofthe following measures:

(A) Minimizing the distance between the transfer points. (B) Enclosingthe transfer points and, ifneeded, exhausting emissions to particulate control equipment duringthe operation ofthe transferring system. (C) Application ofwater orsuitable and effective chemical dust suppressant as needed to minimize visible emissions. (D) An equivalent alternate 

### measure. (5) Transporting aggregate material bytruck, front-end loader, 

### orsimilarvehicle bythe use of one (1) or more ofthe following measures: (A) A completely enclosed vehicle. (B) Tarping the vehicle. (C) Maintaining the vehicle body in such a condition that prevents any leaks of**aggr~g_ate** 

### material

. (D) Spraying the materials in the vehicle with a suitable and effective dust suppressant. (E) An equivalent alternate measure. (6) Loading and unloading operations ofthe material from storage facilities, such as bins, hoppers, ancf silos, onto or out ofvehicles bythe use ofone (1) or more ofthe following**measu'r~s:** 

### (A) Enclosure ofthe material loading 

### and unloading area.

_ (B) Total or partial enclosure ofthe facility and exhausting ofemissions to particulate·collection equipment. Such equipmentshall be approved bythe commissioner. (C) Spraying with water orsuitable and effective chemical dustsuppressant as needed to minimize visible emissions. (D) Reducing the free fall distance. (E) An equivalent alternate measure. (7) Hauling and dumping solid waste (as defined in IC 

### 13-11-2-205(a)) as follows:

(A) Hauling solid waste bythe use ofone (1) or more ofthe following measures:

(i) Wet suppression ofthe material being transported. (ii) Hauling the material enclosed or covered. (iii) Minimizing the free 

### fall distance when unloading from the particulate collection equipment or from the process equipment onto the hauling vehicle, orfrom both. (iv) An equivalent alternate measure. (B) Dumping solid waste bythe use ofone (1) or more ofthe following measures:

(i) Applying water orsuitable and effective chemical dust suppressant on an as needed basis to minimizevisible emissions. (ii) Minimizingthe free fall distance ofthe material. 

### (iii) An equivalent alternate measure. (8) Material handling operations, such as crushing, grinding, screening, and mixing, bythe use ofone (1) or more ofthe following measures:

(A) Wet suppression. (B) Enclosure ofemission source with venting ofemissions to a fabric filter. (C) An equivalentalternate measure

. (9) Building openings, such as doors, windows, powered or unpowered ventilators, or roof monitors, bythe use ofone (1) or more ofthe following measures:

(A) Installing a removable filter over appropriate building openings.

Date: Jun 09,2009 3:20:40PM EDT DIN: 20071 031-IR-326070088PRA Page 5

### Indiana Register (B) Capturing emissions within the building by the use ofa proper hood system and conveying through a ductto particulate collection system approved by the commissioner. (C)'An in-house operating and procedure maintenance program consisting ofthe following:

(i) Proper maintenance ofthe process equipment and particulate collection system approved the commissioner. (ii) Substitution ofthe process equipment, material, oroperating procedure that will minimize visible emissions. (D) An equivalent alternate measure. (f) Within three (3) months of receiving a control plan, the commissionershall notify ISG Burns Harbor LLC of:

.. (1) the approval ofthe control plan; (2) modifications that the commissioner deems necessary to the control plan; or (3) disapproval ofthe control plan. (g) Ifthe commissionerfinds a control plan to be incomplete, ISG Burns Harbor LLC shall provide the commissionerwith the required additional information.
(h) In determining ifan alternate control measure represents a RACM as specified in this'section, ISG Burns Harbor LLC shall submit and the commissioner shall consider information pertainingto factors, including, but not limited to, the following: (1) The impact on the environment in terms ofany increase in water, air, orsolid waste pollution emissions. (2) The energy requirements ofthe selected control measure. (3) The:

(A) capital expenditure; (B) impact on production; and (C) operating costs; to implementthe selected control measure. (4) The impact ofthese costs. (5) Any adverse worker or product safety implications ofthe selected control measure. (i) Ifa control plan is disapproved bythe commissioner, ISG Burns Harbor LLC shall have upto fifteen (15) daysfrom the date of receipt ofthe disapproval letterto request, in writing, a hearing on the matter. In the event a hearing is requested: (1) it shall be held in accordance with the requirements setforth in IC 4-21 ;5; and (2) the burden of proofshall lie with ISG Burns Harbor LLC to demonstratewhy the control plan is appropriate.


### (j) The control plan approved bythe commissionershall become part of ISG Burns Harbor LLC's operating permit. (AirPollution Control Board; 326/AC 6-6-5; filed Mar 10, 1988, 1:20p.m.: 11/R 2510; readopted filedJan 10, 2001, 3:20p.m.: 24/R 1477)

SECTION 2. 3261AC 7-4-141S AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:
3261AC 7-4-14 Porter County sulfurdioxide emission limitations Authority: IC 13-14-8; IC 13-17-3-4; IC 13-17-3-11; IC 13-17-3-12 Affected: IC 13-15; IC 13-17

Sec. 14. The following sources and facilities located in Porter County shall comply with the sulfur dioxide emission limitations in pounds per million Btu (lbs/MMBtu) and pounds per hour (lbs/hr), unless otherwise specified, and other requirements: (1) Betf::llef::leFR SteeiiSG Burns Harbor WeFks; 

### LLC shall comply with the following:

(A) The following facilities shall burn natural gas only:

(i) BOF Shop FM Boiler.

Date: Jun 09,2009 3:20:40PM EDT DIN: 20071031-IR-326070088PRA Page 6 

# •

••

# •

·)· Indiana Register (ii) 160 inch Plate Mill Continuous Hardening and Annealing Heat Treatment Furnace. (iii) 160 inch Plate Mill Boilers No.2 and 4. (iv) Batch Annealing Furnaces (24). (v) Continuous Heat Treat Line- Preheat, Heating and Soaking, and Reheat. (B) The following facilities shall comply with the sulfur dioxide emission limitations and other requirements:

Facility Description (i) Blast Furnace C Stoves (ii) Blast Furnace D Stoves (iii) Blast Furnace Flare 

### (iY1 (iii) Sinter Plant Windbox 

## M (iv) No. 1 Coke Battery Underfire 

## f\41 (v) No. 2 Coke Battery Underfire**~** (vi) Slab Mill Soaking Pits: Emission Limitations lbs/MMBtu 0.83 0.83 

### 9-:W 1.0 pound perton process material

1.73 1.96 lbs/hr 545 545

400
803 911 

### (AA) Ne Not more than nine (9) ofthirty-two (32) horizontally discharged soaking pits may be fired on coke oven gas at the same time with total sulfur dioxide emissions not to exceed four hundred eighty-two (482) pounds per hour. (BB) The remaining twenty-three (23) ofthirty-two (32) horizontally discharged soaking pits may burn blast furnace 

### aAE!IeF or natural gas, 

### or both, with total sulfur dioxide emissions not to exceed twenty-four (24) pounds per hour. (CC) The four (4) vertically discharged soaking pits may burn blast furnace 

### aAE!IeF or natural gas, 

### or both, with total sulfur dioxide emissions not to exceed four (4) pounds per hour. 

### fviffi {vii) 160 inch Plate Mill Continuous Reheat Furnace No. ' arid Boiler No. 1**~(viii)** 160 inch Plate Mill Continuous Reheat Furnace No. 

### 2 and Boiler No. 3 1.96 299
1.96 299 

## W (ix) 80 inch Hot Strip Mill Furnace No. 1, 2, and 3 1.96 79 each**~** (x) 110 inch Plate Mill Furnaces No. 1 and 2 1.96 441**~(xi)** 110 inch Plate Mill Normalizing Furnace ·1.07 88 

### {*itij (xii) 160 inch Plate Mill I & 

### 0 Furnaces No.4 and 5 1.96 274 

### {*iYt (xiii) 160 inch Plate Mill I & 

### 0 Furnaces No. 6 and 7 1.96 27 4**~** (xiv) 160 inch Plate Mill I & 

### 0 Furnace No. 8 1.96 176**~** (xv) Power Station Boiler No.7 0.8 520**~** (xvi) Power Station Boilers No.8, 9, 10, 11, and 12 1.45 2,798 (C) As an alternative to the sulfur dioxide emission limitations specified in clause (B), Bethlehem 8teeiiSG Burns 

### Harbor LLC shall comply with the sulfurdioxide emission limitations and other requirements as follows:
Facility Description (i) Blast Furnace C Stoves (ii) Blast Furnace D Stoves (iii) Blast Furnace Flare 

## M (iii) Sinter Plant Windbox 

## M (iv) No. 1 Coke Battery Underfire 

## f\41 (v) No. 2 Coke Battery Underfire**~** (vi) Slab Mill Soaking Pits: Emission Limitations lbs/MMBtu 0.75 0.75 (}..97 1.0 pound perton process material

1.57 1.78 lbs/hr 498 498

400
730 828 

### (AA) Ne Not more than six (6) ofthirty-two (32) horizontally discharged soaking pits may be fired on coke oven gas at the same time with total sulfurdioxide emissions notto exceed two hundred ninety-two (292) pounds per hour. (BB) The remaining twenty-six (26) ofthirty-two (32) horizontally discharged soaking pits may burn blast furnace 

### aAEYer or natural gas, 

### or both, with total sulfur dioxide emissions not to exceed twenty-seven (27) pounds per hour. (CC) The four (4) vertically discharged soaking pits may burn blast furnace 

### aAE!IeF or natural gas, 

### or both, with total sulfur dioxide emissions not to exceed four (4) pounds per hour. 

### f.'iiij (vii) 160 inch Plate Mill Continuous Reheat Furnace No. 1.78 293

Date: Jun 09,2009 3:20:40PM EDT DIN: 20071031-IR-326070088PRA Page 7Indiana Register 1 and Boiler No. 1**~** (viii) 160 inch Plate Mill Continuous Reheat Furnace No. 

### 2arid Boiler No. 3 

## W (ix) 80 inch Hot Strip Mill Furnace No. 1, 2, and 3 

## M (x) 110 inch Plate Mill Furnaces No. 1 and 2**~** (xi) 110 inch Plate Mill Normalizing Furnace**~** (xii) 160 inch Plate Mill I & 

### 0 Furnaces No. 4 and 5 If 160 inch Plate Mill I & 

### 0 Furnaces No.6

### aREllef or 7, or both, are in operation on a fuel otherthan natural gas, Furnaces No. 4 and 5 shall not operate or shall burn natural gas only.**~** (xiii) 160 inch Plate Mill I & 

### 0 Furnaces No. 6 and 7 If 160 inch Plate Mill I & 

### 0 Furnaces No.4

### aREllef or 5, or both, are in operation on a fuel otherthan natural gas, Furnaces No. 6 and 7 shall not operate or shall burn natural gas only.**~** (xiv) 160 inch Plate Mill I 

### & 

### 0 Furnace No. 8**~** (xv) Power Station Boilers No. 7**~** (xvi) Power Station Boilers No. 8, 9, 10, 11, and 12 1.78
1.78 1.78 1.07 1.78

1.78

1.78 0.8 1.45total 293
483 each 401 88 249

249

160 520 2,500 total (>Eviii) 8ethleheR'I Steel (xvii) ISG Burns Harbor LLC shall notify the department at least twenty-four (24) hours prior to reliance on the alternative set of limits specified in items (i) through (>wii). 8ethleheR'I Steel (xvi). ISG Burns Harbor LLC shall maintain records offuel type and operational status offacilities listed in items (xii) and (xiii}and (xiv) and shall make the records available to the department upon request.**~** (xviii) For the purposes of326 lAC 7-2-1(c)(2), compliance shall be determined based on separate calendar month averages for the set of requirements specified in this clause andfor the set of requirements specified in clause (B). (D) Coke oven gas usage at facilities otherthan the No. 1 and 2 Coke Battery Underfire Stacks shall be restricted to Ae not more than seventy-five (75) million cubic feet per day. Total sulfur dioxide emissions

# ~

from the facilities listed in clause (B)(i)through (8)(iv), (8)(vii)0'\l\) thFOU§h (8)(vii)(88), (8)(viii) thFOU§h • 

### f81(>et; (B)(iii), (B)(vi)(AA) through (B)(vi)(BB), (B)(vii) through (B)(x), and (8)(>(iii) thFOU§h (8)(>wii) (B)(xii) through (B)(xvi) shall not exceed four thousand four hundred twenty-nine (4,429) pounds per hour. During periods in which the limits contained in clause (C) are in effect, coke oven gas usage atfacilities otherthan the No. 1 and 2 Coke Battery Underfire Stacks shall be restricted to Ae not more than seventy (70) million cubic feet per day, and total sulfur dioxide emissions from the facilities listed in clause (C)(i) through (G)(iv), (G)(vii)(M) thFOU§h (G)(vii)(88), (G)(viii) thFOU§h (G)(>(i), (C)(iii), (C)(vi)(AA) through (C)(vi)(BB), (C)(vii) through (C)(x), and (G)(niii) thFOU§h (G)(>Piii) (C)(xii) through (C)(xvi) shall not exceed four thousand six hundred thirty (4,630) pounds per hour. (E) 8ethleheR'I SteeiiSG Burns Harbor LLC shall achieve compliance with the requirements specified in clause (B) or (C) priorto December 31, 1988. Thereafter, 8ethleheR'I SteeiiSG Burns Harbor LLC shall submit a report to the department within thirty (30) days following the end of each calendar quarter containing the following information:

(i) Records ofthe total coke oven gas, blast furnace gas, fuel oil, and natural gas usage for each day at each facility listed in clauses (B) thFOU§h and (C). · (ii) Records ofthe:

(AA) average sulfur content and heating value as determined perthe procedures specified in clause (F) for each fuel type used during the calendar quarter; and 

### ef...tRe (BB) maximum number of slab mill soaking pits burning coke oven gas at any given time during each day. (iii) The calculated sulfur dioxide emission rate in the applicable emission units (pounds per hour, pounds per million Btu, 

### aREllef or pounds perton) for each facility for each day and the average sulfur dioxide emissions from the facilities listed in clause (C)(i) through (G)(iv), (G)(vii)(Al\) through (G)(vii)(88), (G)(viii) thFOU§h (G)(>Ei), (C)(iii), (C)(vi)(AA) through (C)(vi)(BB), (C)(vii) through {C){x), and (G)(niii) thFOU§h (G)(>EVii) (C)(xii) through (C){xvi) for each day in pounds per hour during the calendar quarter. (F) 8ethleheR'I SteeiiSG Burns Harbor LLC shall submit a sampling and analysis protocol to the department by December 31, 1988. The protocol shall:

(i) contain a description of planned procedures for:

(AA) sampling ofsulfur-bearing fuels and materials; 

### fef (BB) analysis ofthe sulfur content; and 

### fef • (CC) any planned direct measurement ofsulfur dioxide emissions vented to the atmosphere; The pFotoeol 

### sflaJ.I. and (ii) specify the frequency of sampling, analysis, 

### aREllef and measurement for each:

Date: Jun 09,2009 3:20:40PM EDT DIN: 20071031-IR-326070088PRA Page 8

# •• Indiana Register (AA) fuel and material; and for each (BB) facility. The department shall incorporate the protocol into the source's operation permit per procedures specified in 326 lAC 2. The department may revise the protocol as necessaryto establish acceptable sampling, analysis, aMiefand measurements procedures and frequency. The department may also require that a source conduct a stack test at any facility listed in this subdivision within thirty (30) days ofwritten notification by the department. (2) Northern Indiana Public Service Company Bailly Station shall complywith the following: Facility Description (A) Boilers 7 and 8 Boilers 7 and 8 shall be fired with coal, fuel oil, or natural gas. (B) Gas Turbine 10 (3) Midwest Steel shall comply with the following: Emission Limitations lbs/MMBtu 6.0 each
natural gas only
Facility Description Emission Limitations lbs/MMBtu Babcock and Wilcox Boiler 1 and Erie City Boilers No. 1, 2, and 3 1.33**e~ch** 

### Only two (2) offour (4) boilers may burn fuel oil with a sulfur dioxide emission rate greater than three-tenths (0.3) pounds per million Btu atthe same time. Midwest Steel shall maintain records offuel type for each boiler for each hour. The records offuel type shall be made available to the department upon request. (4) Air Products and Chemical shall complywith the following: Facility Description Emission Limitations All boilers and the No. 3 Hydrogen Reformer natural gas only (AirPollution ControlBoard; 3261AC 7-4-14: filedAug28, 1990, 4:50p.m.: 141R 78; readopted filed Jan 10, 2001, 3:20p.m.: 241R 1477; errata filedDec 12, 2002, 3:35p.m.: 261R 1568)

Notice of Public Hearing

Posted: 10/31/2007byLegislative ServicesAgency An html version ofthis document.

Date: Jun 09,2009 3:20:40PM EDT DIN: 20071031-IR-326070088PRA Page 9

# •

# ATTACHMENT H

### j j I 

### j

I 

### j

I

### j 

## lj 

## j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j

j j

# •

•

• Indiana Register TITLE 326 AIR POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD Proposed Rule LSA Document #07-88
DIGEST
Amends 326 lAC 6-6-5 and 326 lAC 7-4-14 concerning operations at ISG Burns Harbor LLC. Effective 30 days after filing with the Publisher.
HISTORY First Notice: February 21, 2007, Indiana Register (DIN: 20070221-IR-326070088FNA). Second Notice: August 8, 2007, Indiana Register (DIN: 20070808-IR-326070088SNA). Notice of First Hearing: August 8, 2007, Indiana Register (DIN: 20070808-IR-326070088PHA). Date of First Hearing: October 3, 2007.
PUBLIC COMMENTS UNDER IC 13-14-9-4.5 IC 13-14-9-4.5 states that a board may not adopt a rule under IC 13-14-9 that is substantively different from the draft rule published under IC 13-14-9-4 until the board has conducted a third comment period that is at least 21 days long.

. Because this proposed rule is not substantively different from the draft rule published on August 8, 2007, at DIN: 20070808-IR-326070088SNA, the Indiana Department of Environmental Management (IDEM) is not requesting additional comment on this proposed rule.
SUMMARY/RESPONSE TO COMMENTS FROM THE SECOND COMMENT PERIOD The Indiana Department of Environmental Management (IDEM) requested public comment from August 8, 2007, through September 7, 2007, on IDEM's draft rule language. IDEM received comments from the following party: ISG Burns Harbor LLC (ISG) Following is a summary ofthe comments received and IDEM's responses thereto: Comment:We support the draft amendments to 326 lAC 6-6-5 "Bethlehem Steel Corporation fugitive dust control strategy". The amended rule will allow more flexibility to employ improved technologies on a schedule based on actual plant operations. The amount of paved and unpaved roads and their configurations have changed over the last 20 years, so that the map and mileage requirements of326 lAC 6-6-5 are no longer accurate. (ISG) Response: IDEM agrees that the draft amendments to 326 lAC 6-6-5 will provide more efficient use of resources and provide equivalent or improved fugitive particulate matter emission control. IDEM believes that the section ofthe draft rule amending 326 lAC 6-6-5 provides thorough guidance on howto address the potential fugitive particulate matter emissions, and that the draft amendments to 326 lAC 6-6-5 will result in a plan that is easierto modify as newtechnologies or business practices are introduced, and will also result in more efficient and less costly fugitive particulate matter control strategies. Comment: We suggest that "Bethlehem Steel Corporation" and "Bethlehem" be deleted and replaced throughout 326 lAC 6-6-5 with "ISG Burns Harbor LLC". (ISG) Response: IDEM agrees, and has proposed the appropriate changes in this rulemaking. Comment: We supportthe draft amendmentto 326 lAC 7-4-14 removing the S02. emission limit forthe blast furnace gas flare. Removing the SO emission limit for the blast furnace gas flare willrncrease regulatory consistency, result in no increase in

### ~he actual emissions of S02 and no operational changes at ISG Burns Harbor LLC, result in no impact on modeled emissions, and will eliminate an outdated standard. (ISG) Comment: There is no SO2 emission limit for the blast furnace gas flare at U.S. Steel Gary Works in neighboring Lake County. Air quality modeling conducted for U.S. Steel Gary Works accounted for the use of more blast furnace gas in the other combustion units than could be produc,ed. IDEM agreed that including the blast furnace flares in the Lake County S02 attainment demonstration model was not appropriate when all potentially available blast furnace gas is accounted for in modeled emissions from other combustion units. Because ISG Burns Harbor's system for blast furnace gas combustion is identical to that used by Gary Works, the S02 emission limit for the 326 lAC 7-4-14 blast furnace gas flare can be eliminated without affecting Porter County's**demonstr~ted** SO NAAQS attainment. (ISG)

. . Comment: IDEM shoufct eliminate the 326 lAC 7-4-14 blast furnace gas flare SO emission limit because the emission factor used to generate the emission limitation of0.07 lb/MMBtu is inherentfy difficult to validate and has not been peer reviewed or incorporated in U.S. EPA's Compilation of Emission Factors. (ISG) Response: IDEM agrees that there will be no negative environmental impact on the ambient air quality with respect to S02 emissions as a result ofthis rulemaking. Airquality modeling performed to establish the 326 lAC

Date: Nov 05,2007 9:02:11AM EST DIN: 20071031-IR-326070088PRA Page 1Indiana Register 7-4-14 S02 emission limits for emission points at the steelmaking plant attribute 100% ofthe available blast furnace gas to being used in the blast furnace stoves, coke ovens, and the power station boilers. Compliance with • the S02 emission limits established for the processes using blast furnace gas assures protection ofthe National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) for S0..2, regardless of the presence ofan S02 emission limit for the blast furnace gas flare. IDEM acknowledges that Su2 emission limits are not imposed on flares for any other steelmaking operations or for any other flares in Indiana. IDEM agrees that add-on control technologies do not currently exist for S02 emission control at blast furnace gas flares, and that the blast furnace gas flare is a necessary control device for the safe operation ofthe blast furnace gas distribution system. IDEM further agrees that because the sulfur content present in raw materials processed at ISG Burns Harbor LLC's blast furnaces is highly variable, and that the nature ofthe steelmaking process requires a continuous addition of raw materials to the blast furnace, it is technically infeasible to manage the sulfur content ofthe materials charged in the blast furnace to achieve compliance with the blast furnace flare S02 emission limit. For these reasons, IDEM agrees that it is appropriate and necessary to remove the S02 emission limit for ISG Burns Harbor LLC's blast furnace gas flare from 326 lAC 7-4-14.
SUMMARY/RESPONSE TO COMMENTS RECEIVED AT THE FIRST PUBLIC HEARING On October 3, 2007, the Air Pollution Control Board (board) conducted the first public hearing/board meeting concerning the development of amendments to 326 lAC 6-6-5 and 326 lAC 7-4-14 concerning operations at ISG Burns Harbor LLC. No comments were made at the first hearing.
326 lAC 6-6-5; 326 lAC 7-4-14
SECTION 1. 326 lAC 6-6-5 IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:
326 lAC 6-6-5 ISG Burns Harbor LLC fugitive particulate matteremission control plan Authority: IC 13-14-8; IC 13·17·3-4; IC 13-17·3·11; IC 13-17-3-12 Affected: IC 4-21.5; IC 13-11-2-205; IC 13-15; IC 13-17

Sec. 5. (a) In order to implement its nontraditional fugitive dust control program, Bethlehem shall purchase a high pressure waterflushing truck and a tractor sweeperwith broom and install a waterfilling station for the • flushertruof( and a tanf( for the storage and dispensing of liquid chemical dust retardant. The following control measures shall then be implemented atthe Burns Harbor Plant atthe specified frequency. (1) A total oft'.venty four (24) miles of paved and unpaved roads as shown in Figure 1 shall be controlled as described below: (A) A total of 12.7 miles of paved roads shall be cleaned three (3) times perwee(( by water .,.,·ashing using a flushertruol( mmept as indicated in subseotion (a)(4) ofthis seotion. In addition, at leasttwioe per wool(, 7.9 miles ofthese roads in the primary faoilities area 

### will also be wet swept using a traetor mounted broom following the flusher truelc Road shoulders on the 12.7 miles ofpa·,·ed roads will be graded as required and treated with a eheff!ieal dust retardant at the same frequeney specified below for unpa•t'ed roads. Aeeumulated material on road shoulders will be removed at least once per month. (B) A total of 11.8 miles of unpa\'ed roads shall be oontrolled. This will oonsist offorming a uniform road surfaee by road grading to remO't'O large material, and the application of a two (2) to four (4) ineh layer of fine slag '#here neeessary. Surfaces shall besprayed with dust suppressant solution at an applieation rate eonsistent with the manufaeturer's reeommendations. The dust suppressant material and applioation rate shall be sueh that a crust

### will be formed on the road surfaee that is amenable to oleaning via flushing and sweeping. Road surfaoes shall be cleaned toNiee perwoof( with a flusher truol( followed by a troetor mounted broom. Rood surfaees shall be resprayed with ohemieol dust suppressant as necessaryto maintain a cleanable surfaee. The solution strength and applioation rate will be determined prior to applioatiofl based upon the eondition ofthe surfaces. (2) Bethlehem shall oontrol its lowvolatile seal storage piles by spraying thorn at least onoe perwool( with a chemiool dust retardant. (8) Reoords ofall fugitive dust oontrol aotivities shall be maintained. 

### At a minimum, reeords shall eontain the follo•Ning information: (/\) number of miles and looation ofthe paved roads oleaned; (B) number of miles of unpaved roads which were treated ineluding the type, quantity, and dilution ratio of dust retardant used;

·(G) the type, quantity, and dilution ratio of dust retardant sprayed on low volatile coal storage piles. This information shall be summarized into progress reports and submitted to the board EjUarterly. (4) This nontraditional fugitive dust eontrol program ean be adjusted on a daily basis as needed to talw into •

Date: Nov 05,2007 9:02:11AM EST DIN: 20071031-IR-326070088PRA Page2

# •

•

• Indiana Register account preceding day and forecasted meteorological conditions (for e><ample, rainfall and temperature), and visual observations ofthe roadways scheduled to be oleaned

. (b) Bethlehem Steel Corporation nontraditional fugiti·ie dust control roads is shown as follows (Figure 1):



### (a} Effective November 17, 2007, ISG Burns Harbor LLC shall implement an approved fugitive particulate matteremission control plan meeting the requirements ofthis section.
(b) The following definitions apply throughoutthis section: (1} "As needed basis" means the frequency ofapplication necessaryto minimize visible particulate matter emissions as defined in the control plan. (2} "Fugitive particulate matteremissions" means particulate matterthat is emitted from any source by means otherthan through a stack. (3} "Open aggregate pile" means the unenclosed storage of material consisting of, but not limited to, slag produced during the manufacture of iron and steel, sand, gravel, stone, and coal, which isfiner than two hundred (200} mesh size equal to orgreaterthan one percent (1%} by weight. Open aggregate material mesh size shall be determined by the "American Association ofState Highway and

.Transportation Officials Test Method T27-74", or other equivalent procedures approved bythe

commissioner. (4} "Paved road" means any asphalt or concrete surfaced thoroughfare or right-of-way:

(A} designed or used forvehiculartraffic; and (B) located on the property of, orowned by, an individual or company. (5} "Potential emissions" means fugitive particulate matter emissions calculated afterthe application ofair pollution control:

(A} measures; or (B) equipment. (6} "Unpaved roads" means any surfaced thoroughfare or right-of-way, otherthan a paved road as defined in subdivision (4}, that is:

(A} designed or used forvehiculartraffic; and (B) located on the property of, orowned by, an individual orcompany

.
Date: Nov05,2007 9:02:11AM EST DIN: 20071031-IR-326070088PRA Page 3

### Indiana Register
(c) ISG Burns Harbor LLC's fugitive particulate matter emission control plan shall be in writing and • shall include, at a minimum, the following information: (1) The name and address ofthe owner or operator responsible forthe execution ofthe control plan. (2) Identification ofall:

(A) processes; (B) operations; and (C) areas; that have the potential to emit fugitive particulate matter. (3) A map ofthe source showing the following:

(A) Aggregate pile areas. (B) Access areas around the aggregate piles. (C) Unpaved roads. (D) Paved roads. (E) Parking lots. (F) Location ofconveyors and transfer points. (G) Other potential sources offugitive particulate matter. (4) The number and types ofvehicular activity occurring on the following:

(A) Paved roads. (B) Unpaved roads. (C) Parking lots. (5) The type and quantity of material handled. (6) The equipment used to maintain aggregate piles. (7) A description ofthe measures to be implemented to control fugitive particulate matter emissions resulting from emission points identified in subdivision (3). (8) A specification ofthe dust suppressant material, such as oil orchemical, including the estimated frequency ofapplication, rates, and concentrations ofthe dust suppressant. (9) A specification ofthe particulate matter collection equipment used as a fugitive particulate matter emission control measure. (10) A schedule ofcompliance with the provisions ofthe control plan. The schedule shall specify the • amount oftime the source requires to:

(A) award any necessary contracts; and (B) commence and complete construction, installation, or modification ofthe fugitive particulate matteremission control measures. (11) Other relevant data that may be requested bythe commissionerto evaluate the effectiveness of the control plan. (d) Records that document all control measures and activities to be implemented in accordance with the approved control plan shall be: (1) kept and maintained; (2) retained for at leastfive (5) years; and (3) made available upon the request ofthe commissioner.
(e) All control measures specified in this subsection shall be considered reasonably available control measures (RACM). The frequency ofapplication for all control measures shall be detailed in each control plan. No control plan shall contain control measures that violate the provisions ofstate statutes or rules. Fugitive particulate matteremissions from the emission points specified in this section shall be controlled as follows: (1) Paved roads, unpaved roads, marshaling yards, slab haul roads, slab and coil storage areas, designated beach iron dumping areas, blast furnace slag pit processing activities, iron and steel slag pot dumping areas, and parking lots as follows:

(A) Paved roads and paved parking lots bythe use ofone (1) or more ofthe following measures:

(i) Cleaning byvacuum sweeping. (ii) Flushing. (iii) An equivalent alternate measure. (B) Unpaved roads, marshaling yards, slab haul roads, slab and coil storage areas, designated beach iron dumping areas, blastfurnace slag pit processing activities, iron and steel slag pot dumping areas and unpaved parking lots by the use ofone (1) or more ofthe following measures:

(i) Paving with a material such as asphalt or concrete. • (ii) Treating with a suitable and effective commercially available petroleum based dustsuppressant

Date: Nov05,2007 9:02:11AM EST DIN: 20071031-IR-326070088PRA Page4

# •

•

•• Indiana Register
or water based dust suppressant approved by the commissioner. The frequency ofapplication shall be on an as needed basis. · (iii) Spraying with water. The frequency ofapplication shall be on an as needed basis. (iv) Double chip and seal the road surface and maintain on an as needed basis. (v) An equivalent alternate measure. (2) Open aggregate piles by the use ofone (1) or more ofthe following measures:

(A) Cleaning the area around the perimeter ofthe aggregate piles. (B) Applying a suitable and effective oil or other dust suppressant on an as needed basis. (C) An equivalent alternate measure. (3) Outdoor conveying ofaggregate material, such as, but not limited to, slag produced during the manufacture of iron and steel, sand, gravel, stone, and coal, by equipment such as belt conveyors and bucket elevators, by the use ofone (1) or more ofthe following measures:

(A) Enclosing the conveyor belt totally on the top and sides as needed to minimize visible emissions and, if needed, exhausting emissions to particulate control equipment during operation ofconveyor. (B) Applying water orsuitable and effective chemical dust suppressant at the feed point or at intermediate points, or at both, as needed to minimize visible emissions. (C) An equivalent alternate measure. (4) Transferring ofaggregate material shall be controlled by the use of one (1) or more ofthe following measures:

(A) Minimizing the distance between the transfer points. (B) Enclosing the transfer points and, ifneeded, exhausting emissions to particulate control equipment during the operation ofthe transferring system. · (C) Application ofwater or suitable and effective chemical dust suppressant as needed to minimize visible emissions. (D) An equivalent alternate measure. (5) Transporting aggregate material by truck, front-end loader, orsimilar vehicle by the use ofone (1) or more ofthe following measures:

(A) A completely enclosed vehicle. (B) Tarping the vehicle. (C) Maintaining the vehicle body in such a condition that prevents any leaks ofaggregate material. (D) Spraying the materials in the vehiclewith a suitable and effective dust suppressant. (E) An equivalent alternate measure. (6) Loading and unloading operations ofthe material from storage facilities, such as bins, hoppers, and silos, onto or out ofvehicles by the use ofone (1) or more ofthe following measures: (A) Enclosure ofthe material loading and unloading area. (B) Total or partial enclosure ofthe facility and exhausting ofemissions to particulate collection equipment. Such equipment shall be approved bythe commissioner. (C) Spraying with water orsuitable and effective chemical dustsuppressant as needed to minimize visible emissions. (D) Reducing the free fall distance. (E) An equivalent alternate measure. (7) Hauling and dumping solid waste (as defined in IC 13-11-2-205(a)) as follows:

(A) Hauling solid waste bythe use ofone (1) or more ofthe following measures:

(i) Wet suppression ofthe material being transported. (ii) Hauling the material enclosed orcovered. (iii) Minimizingthe free fall distance when unloading from the particulate collection equipment or from the process equipment onto the hauling vehicle, orfrom both. (iv) An equivalent alternate measure. (B) Dumping solid waste by the use ofone (1) or more ofthefollowing measures:

(i) Applying water orsuitable and effective chemical dust suppressant on an as needed basis to minimize visible emissions. · (ii) Minimizing the free fall distance ofthe material. (iii) An equivalent alternate measure. (8) Material handling operations, such as crushing, grinding, screening, and mixing, by the use ofone

·(1) or more ofthe following measures: (A) Wet suppression. (B) Enclosure ofemission source with venting ofemissions to a fabric filter. (C) An equivalent alternate measure. (9) Building openings, such as doors, windows, powered or unpowered ventilators, or roof monitors, by the use ofone (1) or more ofthe following measures: ·

(A) Installing a removable filter over appropriate building openings.

Date: Nov 05,2007 9:02:11AM EST DIN:**200710~1-IR-326070088PRA** Page 5

### Indiana Register (B) Capturing emissions within the building by the use ofa proper hood system and conveying through a duct to particulate collection system approved by the commissioner. • (C) An in-house operating and procedure maintenance program consisting ofthe following:

(i) Proper maintenance ofthe process equipment and particulate collection system approved the commissioner. (ii) 

### Substitution ofthe process equipment, material, or operating procedure that will minimize visible emissions. (D) An equivalent alternate measure. (f) Within three (3) months of receiving a control plan, the commissioner shall notify ISG Burns Harbor LLC of:

. (1) the approval ofthe control plan; (2) modifications that the commissioner deems necessary to the control plan; or (3) disapproval ofthe control plan. (g) Ifthe commissioner finds a control plan to be incomplete, ISG Burns Harbor LLC shall provide the commissionerwith the required additional information. (h) In determining ifan alternate control measure represents a RACM as specified in this section, ISG Burns Harbor LLC shall submit and the commissioner shall consider information pertaining to factors, including, but not limited to, the following: (1) The impact on the environment in terms ofany increase in water, air, or solid waste pollution emissions. (2) The energy requirements ofthe selected control measure. (3) The:

(A) capital expenditure; (B) impact on production; and (C) operating costs; to implementthe selected control measure. (4) The impact ofthese costs. (5) Any adverse worker or product safety implications ofthe selected control measure. (i) Ifa control plan is disapproved bythe commissioner, ISG Burns Harbor LLC shall have upto fifteen (15) days from the date of receipt ofthe disapproval letterto request, in writing, a hearing on the matter. In the event a hearing is requested: (1) it shall be held in accordance with the requirements setforth in IC 4-21.5; and (2) the bu.rden of proofshall lie with ISG Burns Harbor LLC to demonstrate why the control plan is appropriate. (j) The control plan approved by the commissioner shall become part of ISG Burns Harbor LLC's operating permit. (AirPollution Control Board; 3261AC 6-6-5: filed Mar 10, 1988, 1:20p.m.: 111R 2510; readopted filedJan 10, 2001, 3:20p.m.: 24 IR 1477)



### SECTION 2. 3261AC 7-4-1415 AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:
3261AC 7-4-14 Porter County sulfur dioxide emission limitations Authority: IC 13-14-8; IC 13-17-3-4; IC 13-17-3-11; IC 13-17-3-12 Affected: IC 13-15; IC 13-17

Sec. 14. The following sources and facilities located in Porter County shall comply with the sulfur dioxide emission limitations in pounds per million Btu (lbs/MMBtu) and pounds per hour (lbs/hr), unless otherwise specified, and other requirements: (1) Bethlehem SteeiiSG Burns HarborWefkEr.. LLC shall complywith the following:

(A) The following facilities shall burn natural gas only:

(i) BOF Shop FM Boiler.

Date: Nov05,2007 9:02:) 1AM EST DIN: 20071031-IR-326070088PRA Page6 

# •

•

# •

•

• Indiana Register (ii) 

### 160 inch Plate Mill Continuous Hardening and Annealing Heat Treatment Furnace. (iii) 

### 160 inch Plate Mill Boilers No. 

### 2 and 

### 4 . (iv) Batch Annealing Furnaces 

### (24). (v) Continuous Heat Treat Line- Preheat, Heating and Soaking, and Reheat. (B) The following facilities shall comply with the sulfur dioxide emission limitations and other requirements:

Facility Description (i) Blast Furnace C Stoves (ii) Blast Furnace D Stoves (iii) Blast FuFAaee Flare 

## fW1 (iii) Sinter Plant Windbox 

## M (iv) No. 1 Coke Battery Underfire 

### fvt1 (v) No. 2 Coke Battery Underfire fvtij (vi) Slab Mill Soaking Pits: Emission Limitations lbs/MMBtu 

### 0.83 0.83 {}..{}7 

### 1.0 pound perton process material



### 1.73 1.96 lbs/hr 

### 545 545
400
803 911 (AA) 

### Ne Not more than nine (9) ofthirty-two 

### (32) horizontally discharged soaking pits may be fired on coke 

### oven gas at the same time with total sulfur dioxide emissions not to exceed four hundred eighty-two 

### (482) pounds per hour. (BB) The remaining twenty-three 

### (23) ofthirty-two 

### (32) horizontally discharged soaking pits may burn blast furnace afl€llefor natural gas, or both, with total sulfur dioxide emissions not to exceed twenty-four 

### (24) pounds per hour. (CC) The four (4) 

### vertically discharged soaking pits may burn blast furnace 

### aR6fe!: or natural gas, or both, with total sulfur dioxide emissions not to exceed four (4) pounds per hour. fvffi1 {vii) 

### 160 inch Plate Mill Continuous Reheat Furnace No. 

### 1and Boiler No. 1 

### f*t (viii) 

### 160 inch Plate Mill Continuous Reheat Furnace No. 

### 2 and Boiler No. 3 

### 1.96
1.96 299
299 

## W (ix) 

### 80 inch Hot Strip Mill Furnace No. 

### 1, 2, and 

### 3 1.96 79 each 

### f*tj (x) 

### 110 inch Plate Mill Furnaces No. 

### 1 and 

### 2 1.96 441 f*tij (xi) 

### 110 inch Plate Mill Normalizing Furnace 

### 1.07 88 f*tiij (xii) 

### 160 inch Plate Mill I & 0 Furnaces No. 

### 4 and 

### 5 1.96 274 

## f*ivt (xiii) 

### 160 inch Plate Mill I & 0 Furnaces No. 

### 6 and 

### 7 1.96 27 4 

## f*v1 (xiv) 

### 160 inch Plate Mill I & 0 Furnace No. 

### 8 1.96 176 

## f*vi1 (xv) Power Station Boiler No. 

### 7 0.8 520 f*'.ilij (xvi) Power Station Boilers No. 

### 8, 9, 10, 11, and 

### 12 1.45 2,798 (C) As an alternative to the sulfur dioxide emission limitations specified in clause (B), Bethlehem SteeiiSG Burns Harbor LLC shall comply with the sulfur dioxide emission limitations and other requirements as follows:
Facility Description (i) Blast Furnace C Stoves (ii) Blast Furnace D Stoves (iii) Blast FuFAaee Flare 

## fW1 {iii) Sinter Plant Windbox 

## M (iv) No. 1 Coke Battery Underfire 

### fvt1 (v) No. 2 Coke Battery Underfire 

## fvti1 (vi) Slab Mill Soaking Pits: Emission Limitations lbs/MMBtu 

### 0.75 0.75 {}..{}7 

### 1.0 pound per ton process material



### 1.57 1.78 lbs/hr 

### 498 498
400
730 828 (AA) 

### Ne Not more than six (6) ofthirty-two 

### (32) horizontally discharged soaking pits may be fired on coke oven gas atthe same time with total sulfur dioxide emissions not to exceed two hundred**ninety~two** 

### (292) pounds per hour. (BB) The remaining twenty-six 

### (26) ofthirty-two 

### (32) horizontally discharged soaking pits may burn blast furnace 

### eflEilef or natural gas, or both, with total sulfur dioxide emissions notto exceed twenty-seven 

### (27) pounds per hour. (CC) The four (4) vertically discharged soaking pits may burn blast furnace 

### aREifeF or natural gas, or both, with total sulfur dioxide emissions not to exceed four (4) pounds per hour

.**~** {vii) 

### 160 inch Plate Mill Continuous Reheat Furnace No. 

### 1.78 293

Date: Nov 05,2007 9:02:11AM EST DIN: 20071031-IR-326070088PRA Page 7Indiana Register 1 and Boiler No. 1 

### f*i (viii) 160 inch Plate Mill Continuous Reheat Furnace No. 

### 2 and Boiler No. 3 

### W (ix) 80 inch Hot Strip Mill Furnace No. 1, 2, and 3 

## f*i1 {x) 110 inch Plate Mill Furnaces No. 1 and 2 

## f*itt (xi) 110 inch Plate Mill Normalizing Furnace 

## f*Hl1 {xii) 160 inch Plate Mill I 

### &

### 0 Furnaces No. 4 and 5 If 160 inch Plate Mill I 

### &

### 0 Furnaces No.6 

### aAtlfeF or 7, or both, are in operation on a fuel other than natural gas, Furnaces No. 4 and 5 shall not operate or shall burn natural gas only.**~** (xiii) 160 inch Plate Mill I & 

### 0 Furnaces No. 6 and 7 If 160 inch Plate Mill I & 

### 0 Furnaces No. 4 

### aAtlfeF or 5, or both, are in operation on a fuel other than natural gas, Furnaces No. 6 and 7 shall not operate or shall burn natural gas only. 

## f*'-'1 (xiv) 160 inch Plate Mill I 

### &

### 0 Furnace No.8**~** (xv) Power Station Boilers No. 7 (*vtl1 (xvi) Power Station Boilers No. 8, 9, 10, 11, and 12 1.78
1.78 1.78 1.07 1.78

1.78

1.78 0.8 1.45 total 293
483 each 401 88 249

249

160 520 2,500 total (><viii) Bethlehelfl Steel (xvii) ISG Burns Harbor LLC shall notify the department at least twenty-four (24) hours priorto reliance on the alternative set of limits specified in items (i) through (>E'tii). Bethlehelfl Steel (xvi). ISG Burns Harbor LLC shall maintain records offuel type and operational status offacilities listed in items (xii) and (xiii) and (>Ei.,') and shall make the records available to the department upon request.**~** (xviii) Forthe purposes of 326 lAC 7-2·1 (c)(2), compliance shall be determined based on separate calendar month averages for the set of requirements specified in this clause and for the set of requirements specified in clause (B). (D) Coke oven gas usage at facilities otherthan the No. 1 and 2 Coke Battery Underfire Stacks shall be restricted to oo not more than seventy-five (75) million cubic feet per day. Total sulfur dioxide emissions from the facilities listed in clause (B)(i) through (B)(iv), (B)(v-ii)(/V\) tl1rough (B)(vii)(BB), (B)(viii) tl1rough 

# ••**~** (B)(iii), (B)(vi)(AA) through (B)(vi)(BB), (B)(vii) through (B)(x), and (B)(>dii) througl1 (B)(><v-ii) • (B)(xii) through (B)(xvi) shall not exceed four thousand four hundred twenty-nine (4,429) pounds per hour. During periods in which the limits contained in clause (C) are in effect, coke oven gas usage at facilities other than the No. 1 and 2 Coke Battery Underfire Stacks shall be restricted to oo not more than seventy (70) million cubic feet per day, and total sulfur dioxide emissions from the facilities listed in clause (C)(i) through (G)(i'w"), (G)(·,•ii)(/\1\) througl1 (G)(vii)(BB), (G)(viii) tl1rougl1 (G)(>Ei), (C)(iii), (C)(vi)(AA) through {C)(vi)(BB), (C)(vii) through (C)(x), and (G)(xiii) througl1 (G)(>E't'ii) (C)(xii) through (C)(xvi) shall not exceed four thousand six hundred thirty (4,630) pounds per hour. (E) Bethlehelfl SteeiiSG Burns Harbor LLC shall achieve compliance with the requirements specified in clause (B) or (C) priorto**Decemb<~r** 31, 1988. Thereafter, Bethlehelfl SteeiiSG Burns Harbor LLC shall submit a report to the department within thirty (30) days following the end of each calendar quarter containing the following information:

(i) Records ofthe total coke oven gas, blast furnace gas, fuel oil, and natural gas usage for each day at each facility listed in clauses (B) through and (C). (ii) Records ofthe:

(AA) average sulfur content and heating value as determined perthe procedures specified in clause (F) for each fuel type used during the calendar quarter; and 

### ef...tAe (BB) maximu,m number of slab mill soaking pits burning coke oven gas at any given time during each day. (iii) The calculated sulfur dioxide emission rate in the applicable emission units (pounds per hour, pounds per million Btu, 

### aAtlfeF or pounds per ton) for each facility for each day and the average sulfur dioxide emissions from the facilities listed in clause (C)(i) through (G)(iv), (G)(vii)(AA) through (G)(vii)(BB), (G)(viii) through (G)(>d), (C)(iii), (C)(vi)(AA) through (C)(vi)(BB), (C)(vii) through {C)(x), and (G)(>Eiii) throl:lgh (G)(>E'tii) {C)(xii) through {C)(xvi) for each day in pounds per hour during the calendar quarter. (F) Bethlehelfl Steel ISG Burns Harbor LLC shall submit a sampling and analysis protocol to the department by December 31, 1988. The protocol shall:

(i) contain a description of planned procedures for:

{AA) sampling ofsulfur-bearing fuels and materials; 

### fe!: {BB) analysis ofthe sulfur content; and 

### fe!: {CC) any planned direct measurement ofsulfur dioxide emissions vented to the atmosphere; The protocol shaHand. , • {ii) specify the frequency ofsampling, analysis, aA6tef and measurement for each:

Date: Nov 05,2007 9:02:11AM EST DIN: 20071031-IR-326070088PRA Page 8

# •

•

• Indiana Register (AA) fuel and material; and fur each (BB) facility

. The department shall incorporate the protocol into the source's operation permit per procedures specified in 326 lAC 2. The department may revise the protocol as necessary to establish acceptable sampling, analysis, 

### afl6leF and measurements procedures and frequency. The department may also require that a source conduct a stack test at any facility listed in this subdivision within thirty (30) days ofwritten notification by the department. (2) Northern Indiana Public Service Company Bailly Station shall comply with the following: Facility Description (A) Boilers 7 and 8 Boilers 7 and 8 shall be fired with coal, fuel oil, or natural gas. (B) Gas Turbine 10 (3) Midwest Steel shall comply with the following: Emission Limitations lbs/MMBtu 6.0 each
natural gas only
Facility Description Emission Limitations lbs/MMBtu Babcock and Wilcox Boiler 1 and Erie City Boilers No. 1, 2, and 3 1.33 each Only two (2) offour (4) boilers may burn fuel oil with a sulfur dioxide emission rate greater than three-tenths (0.3) pounds per million Btu at the same time. Midwest Steel shall maintain records offuel type for each boiler for each hour. The records offuel type shall be made available to the department upon request. (4) Air Products and Chemical shall comply with the following: Facility Description All boilers and the No. 3 Hydrogen Reformer Emission Limitations natural gas only (AirPollution ControlBoard; 3261AC 7-4-14; filedAug 28, 1990, 4:50p.m.: 141R 78; readopted filedJan 10, 2001, 3:20p.m.: 24 IR 1477; errata filed Dec 12, 2002, 3:35p.m.: 261R 1568)

Notice of Public Hearing

Posted: 10/31/2007byLegislative Services Agency An html version ofthis document.

Date: Nov 05,2007 9:02:11AM EST DIN: 20071031-IR-326070088PRA Page 9

# •

•

•

# ATTACHMENT 

# I

# •

•

• Indiana Register TITLE 326 AIR POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD 

### Proposed Rule LSA Document #07-88
DIGEST
Amends 326 lAC 6-6-5 and 326 lAC 7-4-14 concerning operations at ArcelorMittal Burns Harbor LLC. NOTE: UnderIC 13-14-9-11, LSA Document#07-88, postedat20071031-IR-326070088PRA, was resubmitted for publication. Effective 30 days afterfiling with the Publisher.
HISTORY First Notice: February 21, 2007, Indiana Register (DIN: 20070221-IR-326070088FNA). Second Notice: August 8, 2007, Indiana Register (DIN: 20070808-IR-326070088SNA). Notice of First Hearing: August 8, 2007, Indiana Register (DIN: 20070808-IR-326070088PHA). Date of First Hearing: October 3, 2007. Proposed Rule: October 31, 2007, Indiana Register (DIN: 20071031-IR-326070088PRA). Notice of Second Hearing: October 31, 2007, Indiana Register (DIN: 20071031-IR-326070088PHA). Change in Notice of Public Hearing: January 16, 2008, Indiana Register (DIN: 20080116-IR-326070088CHA). Change in Notice of Public Hearing: December 3, 2008, Indiana Register (DIN: 20081203-IR-326070088CHA). Change in Notice of Public Hearing: February 25, 2009, Indiana Register (DIN: 20090225-IR-326070088CHA). Date ofSecond Hearing: April 1, 2009. REQUEST FOR PUBLIC COMMENTS The proposed (preliminarily adopted) rule is substantively different from the proposed rule published on October 31, 2007, at 20071031-IR-326070088PBA. The Indiana Department of Environmental Management (IDEM) is requesting comment on the entire proposed (preliminarily adopted) rule. These comments and the department's responses thereto will be presented to the board for its consideration at final adoption under IC 13- 14-9-6. Mailed comments should be addressed to: #07-88 ArcelorMittal BH LLC Amy Smith Mail Code 61-49 c/o Administrative Assistant Rule Development Branch Office of Legal Counsel Indiana Department of Environmental Management 100 North Senate Avenue Indianapolis, Indiana 46204 Hand delivered comments will be accepted by the receptionist on duty at the Office of Legal Counsel, Thirteenth Floor East, 100 North Senate Avenue, Indianapolis, Indiana. Comments mayalso be submitted by facsimile to (317) 233-5517, Monday through Friday, between 8:15a.m. and 4:45p.m. Please confirm the timely receipt of faxed comments by calling the Rule Development Section at (317) 233-8903.
COMMENT PERIOD DEADLINE Comments must be postmarked, faxed, or hand delivered by June 12, 2009.
SUMMARY/RESPONSE TO COMMENTS RECEIVED ATTHE SECOND PUBLIC HEARING On April 1, 2009, the Air Pollution Control Board (board) conducted the second public hearing/board meeting concerning the development ofamendments to 326 lAC 6-6-5 and 326 lAC 7-4-14. Comments were made by the following parties: Janet McCabe, Improving Kids Environment (IKE) Following is a summary ofthe comments received and IDEM's responses thereto: Comments: It is hard totell what are the additional changes to the proposed rule. To the extent that the department acknowledges that the changes are not a logical outgrowth, it suggests that the changes are significant. The fact sheet says that the changes allow greaterflexibility but does not provide additional explanation ofthe changes. I do agree with the overall approach ofthe rulemaking, where it is betterto have a company submit a plan for approval to control fugitive dust rather than spelling out everydetail in the rule, which is howthe rule was originally written. However, I do have some questions about some ofthe changes the department is suggesting. The new

Date: May 22,2009 7:52:35AM EDT DIN: 20090513-IR-326070088PRA Page 1Indiana Register proposed rule presented today changes the definition ofopen aggregate pile. In the original rule (first proposed rule) the definition included a variety ofdifferenttypes of materials. In the proposed rule before the board today, it • isjust limited to coal. I am curious why the other materials are no longer included in the fugitive dust control plan? The proposed rule also seems to limit the types of locations ofthe plant that will be covered by the fugitive dust control plan to coal piles and paved and unpaved roads. The previous proposed rule included areas around piles, parking lots, areas where material is transferred or conveyed from one place to another, which is an area where fugitive dust could be generated. I would like to know why these areas are no longer to be covered by the fugitive dust control plan? It appears that steel mills often have contractors, separate from the steel mill itself, that work and conduct various operations on their property. In the proposed rule it does not appearthatthe areas for which the contractors are responsible are covered in the fugitive dust control plan, is that correct? I look forward to hearing from the department and discussing the changes in the proposed rule and what the impactwill be on the creation or reduction offugitive dust on the property. (IKE) Response: The company, currently known as ArcelorMittal Burns Harbor LLC (ArcelorMittal), requested that IDEM amend the rule 326 lAC 6-6-5, Bethlehem Steel Corporation fugitive dust control strategy. This rule was originally developed in 1988 as a nontraditional fugitive dust control plan for the facility. The existing rule language at 326 lAC 6-6-5 contains explicit prescriptive measures to control fugitive dust at the facility for paved roads, unpaved roads, and low volatile coal storage piles. ArcelorMittal requested the rule change because the specific control measures required bythe rule were no longer the most efficient or effective methods for controlling the fugitive emissions from the roadways and coal piles at the facility. ArcelorMittal wanted to implement more efficient dust control practices forthe fugitive dust emission points in the existing rule (paved roads, unpaved roads, and coal piles) while providing the opportunityfor flexibility in the future by removing the prescriptive language in 326 lAC 6-6-5 and submitting to IDEM a fugitive dust control plan modeled afterthe requirements for fugitive dust control plans in 326 lAC 6-5. The draft rule language in the Second Notice ofComment Period was a full text incorporation ofnearly all the language for fugitive dust control plans from 326 lAC 6-5. Following preliminary adoption ofthe draft rule at an Air Pollution Control Board hearing on October 31, 2007, ArcelorMittal requested that IDEM amend the proposed rule language. ArcelorMittal objected to the inclusion ofemission points and control measures forwhich they are not responsible underthe existing 326 lAC 6-6-5. ArcelorMittal is not required to control fugitive dustfrom all the emission points that were listed in the previous proposed rule (piles, parking lots, areas where material is • transferred or conveyed from one place to another, etc) and ArcelorMittal is not subject to the applicability of326 lAC 6-5. ArcelorMittal is not responsible for those areas in the existing rule and any rule amendments should not enlarge ArcelorMittal's responsibilities for providing fugitive dust control for those areas. Following ArcelorMittal's clarification oftheir request for amendments to the proposed rule language, IDEM amended the proposed rule to ensure that the scope ofthe proposed rule language at 326 lAC 6-6-5 is consistent with the existing rule language at 326 lAC 6-6-5. The following changes were made to the original proposed rule to ensure that the scope ofArcelorMittal's fugitive dust control plan does not enlarge ArcelorMittal's existing requirements to control fugitive dustfrom paved roads, unpaved roads and coal piles: 1. Amended the definition ofopen aggregate pile to include only coal because ArcelorMittal is not responsible underthe existing rule forthe additional materials (slag, sand, gravel, and stone). 2. Removed from subsection (c) and (d) all emission points and control measures exceptthose for which ArcelorMittal is currently required to control underthe existing rule at 326 lAC 6-6-5. IDEM is not requiring ArcelorMittal to expand their fugitive particulate matter control plan to include those areas on their propertythat contractors currently manage. ArcelorMittal is not responsible for controlling fugitive dust from those areas underthe existing rule language and is not required to coritrol those areas underthe revised 326 lAC 6-6-5 rule language. IDEM is not expanding the scope ofArcelorMittal's fugitive dust control responsibilities in this rulemaking. The portion ofthe rulemaking dealing with fugitive dust is simply amending the process in which ArcelorMittal may request changes to their existing fugitive dust control responsibilities. The amendments will permit ArcelorMittal to submit a plan for controlling fugitive dust for IDEM approval that is no less stringentthan their existing requirements. The existing language in 326 lAC 6-6-5 does not allow ArcelorMittal to update or modify theirfugitive dust control strategy without completing an amendmentto the rule language. The amendments to 326.lAC 6-6-5 allowArcelorMittal to submit for review and approval to the department a fugitive dust control plan for the paved roads, unpaved roads, and coal piles, rather than have the prescribed measures for controlling fugitive dustfrom those areas stated explicitly in the rule language. This rulemaking should provide ArcelorMittal with the flexibility thatthey requested. This rulemaking is neither a relaxation nor a strengthening ofArcelorMittal's fugitive <;lust control requirements under 326 lAC 6-6-5. IDEM • does not expect any additional fugitive dust emissions from the ArcelorMittal facility as a result ofthese changes to the proposed rule. This rulemaking is amending the rule language to provide ArcelorMittal the opportunity to submit a fugitive dust control plan rather than have a prescribed fugitive dust control strategy explicitly stated in

Date: May22,2009 7:52:35AM EDT DIN: 20090513-IR-326070088PRA Page2

# •

•

• Indiana Register rule language. 

### Small Business Assistance Information IDEM established a compliance and technical assistance (CTAP) program under IC 13-28-3. The program provides assistance to small businesses and information regarding compliance with environmental regulations. In accordance with IC**13~28-3** and IC 13-28-5, there is a small business assistance program ombudsman to provide a point of contact for small businesses affected by environmental regulations. Information on the CTAP program, the monthly CT AP newsletter, and other resources available can be found at: http://www.in.gov/idem/4108.htm Small businesses affected bythis rulemaking may contact the Small Business Regulatory Coordinator:

Alison Surface IDEM Compliance and Technical Assistance Program- OPPTA MC 60-04 IGCS W041 100 North Senate Avenue Indianapolis, IN 46204-2251 (317) 232-8172 or (800) 988-7901 ctap@idem.in.gov The Small Business Assistance Program Ombudsman is: Brad Baughn IDEM Small Business Assistance Program Ombudsman MC 50-01 -IGCN 1307 100 North Senate Avenue Indianapolis, IN 46204-2251 (317) 234-3386 bbaughn@idem.in.gov


### 326 lAC 6-6·5; 326 lAC 7-4-14
SECTION 1. 326 lAC 6-6-5 IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:


### 326 lAC 6-6-5 ArcelorMittal Burns Harbor LLC fugitive particulate matter emission control plan Authority: IC 13-14·8; IC 13-17 Affected: IC 4-21.5; IC 13-11-2-205; IC 13-15

Sec. 5. (a) In oreer to implement its nontroditional fugitive dust oontrol program, Betl'llel'lem sl'lall purol'lase a RigA pressure**•~t•ater** flusl'ling truok and a traotor sweeper'NitA eroom and install a water filling station fortAo flusl'ler truol( and a tank fortAo storage and dispensing ofliquid ol'lemioal dust retardant. Tl'le following oontrol measures sl'lall then eo implemented attl'le B\:JFAS Hareor Plant at the speeified frequeney. 

### (1) A total oftwenty four (24) miles of paved and unpa>1ed roads as sho·t't'n in Figure 

### 1 shall be eontrolled as desorieed eelow:**\)** A total of 12.7 miles ofpa\·ed roads sl'lall eo oleaned tRree (6) times perwool( eywater wasl'ling using a

flusAer true!(**O~(oept** as indieated in sueseotion (a)(4) oftAis seotion. In addition, at leasttv.·ioe perwool(, 7.9 miles oftAese roads in tAo 19rimary faeilities area will also eo wet S'#Oj9t usiA€! a trootor FAountefi 

# a room following tl'le flusl'ler truol<. Road shoulders on tl'le 12.7 miles ofpa't·efi roads will eo €Jraded as requirefi anfi treated 'NitA a oAemieal Eiust retardant attl'le same frequeney speoified eelow fer un19a'IOd roads. Aoeumulated material on road sAoulders 'Nill eo remo·.·ed at least onee per month. (B) A total of 

### 11.a FAiles ofunpa•red roads sAall be eontrolled. Thiswill oonsist offormin€J a unifoFFA road surface ey road gral:iin€1 to remove large material, and tAo application ofa two (2) 

### to feur (4) incA layer of fine slag wAere necessary. Surfaces sAall eo sprayefi witA dust suj9pressant solution at an application rate oonsistent with the manufacturer's reoommendations. TAo dust suppressant material and application rate shall eo suoh tAat a crust \'Jill ee formefi on tl'le road surface that is amenable

### to cleaning via flushin€1 and S't'i'eeping. Road surfaees shall be cleaned t\'t·ioe perwool(**wit~** a flusher true!( fallowed by a tractor mounted brooFA. Road surfaces sl'lall be resprayed 't't'ith oAeFAioal Elust suj9pressant as necessary

### to FAaiAtain a cleanable st:Jrface. Tho soll:ltion strengtA ana application rate will be deteFFAined prior

### to application based 1:1pon tJ:le conaition oftJ:lo sl:lrfaces. · (2) BothleJ:leFA sAall control its low volatile coal storage piles ey spraying tJ:leFA at least onee perv.·eel( with a eAomioal d1:1st retardant. (6) Reeorfis of all fu€Jiti't·e dust control aoti·.•ities sAall ee FAaintained. 

### ,'\t a miniFAum, reeords shall eontain the following inforFAation: (A) n1:1mber of miles and location ofthe pa"t•ed roads oleanefi;

Date: May 22,2009 7:52:35AM EDT DIN: 20090513-IR-326070088PRA Page 3

### Indiana Register

I 

### (8) AUffll3er offfliles of uApaveel roaels wf:lief:l were treateel iAelueliAg tf:le type, quaAtity, aAel elilutioA ratio of elust retarelaAt usee!; (G) tf:le type, quaAtity, aAel elilutioA ratio of elust retarelaAt sprayeel OR low volatile eoal storage piles. Tf:lis iAforfflatioA sf:lall 13e sufflfflarizeel iAto progress reports aAel sul3fflitteel to tf:le 13oarel quarterly. (4) Tf:lis AOAtraelitioAal fugitive elust eoAtrol pregraffl eaR 13e aeljusteel OR a elaily 13asis as Aeeeleel to tal<e iAto aeeouAt preeeeliAg elay

### aAel foreeasteel ffleteorelogieal eoAelitioAs (for e>Eafflple, raiAfall aAel teFAperature), aAel visual ol3sePt•atioAs oftf:le reaelways sef:leeluleel to 13e oleaReel. (13) Betf:llef:leffl Steel GorporatioA AOAtraelitioAal fugiti·;e elust eoAtrol roaels is sf:lowA as follo•.vs (Figure 1):

i**----+-U&~~-~~~~~** 

# ' t j ...:..:.:

.....

### +='!!~~.............

### ~lit! 

## I

W 'I•" II I 

# -

.....

(a) ArcelorMittal Burns Harbor LLC shall submit afugitive particulate matteremission control plan for the Burns Harbor Plant (Plant ID 127-00001) located at U.S. Highway 12 meeting the requirements ofthis section tothe departmentwithin three (3) months afterthe effective date ofthis rule, notwithstanding section 3 ofthis rule. The plan shall be in accordance with and subjecttothe following requirements: (1) 326 lAC 6-4-6. (2) Emission factors and control efficiencies in 3261AC 6-5-1(d)(1) through 326 lAC 6-5-1(d)(3). (3) ArcelorMittal Burns Harbor L,LC may petition the commissionerto use emission factors and control efficiencies otherthan those referenced in subdivision (2) ifadequate support documentation is submitted demonstrating thatthe submitted emission factors and control efficiencies provide equivalent protection for human health and the environment. (b) The following definitions applythroughoutthis section: (1) "As needed basis" means the frequency ofapplication necessary to minimizevisible particulate matteremissions as defined in the control plan. (2) "Fugitive particulate matteremissions" means particulate matterthat is emitted from any source by means otherthan through a stack. 

# •

•

(3) "Open aggregate pile" means the unenclosed storage ofcoal, which is finerthan two hundred (200) mesh size equal to or greaterthan one percent (1 %) 

### byweight. Open aggregate material mesh size • shall be determined bythe ''American Association ofState Highway and Transportation Officials Test Method T27-74"*, orother procedures equivalent in reliability as approved bythe commissioner.

Date: May 22,2009 7:52:35AM EDT DIN: 20090513-IR-326070088PRA Page4

# •

•

• Indiana Register 

### (4) "Paved road" means any asphalt orconcrete surfaced thoroughfare or right-of-way:

(A) designed or usedforvehiculartraffic; and (B) located on the property of, or owned by, ArcelorMittal Burns Harbor LLC. (5) "Potential emissions" means fugitive particulate matteremissions calculated afterthe application ofairpollution control:

(A) measures; or (B) equipment. (6) "RACM" means reasonably available control measure. (7) "Unpaved roads" means any surfaced thoroughfare or right-of-way, otherthan a paved road as defined in subdivision (4), that is: (A) designed or used forvehiculartraffic; and (B) located on the property of, or owned by, ArcelorMittal Burns Harbor LLC.
(c) The contents and record keeping requirements forthe fugitive particulate matteremissions control plan are as follows: (1) The control plan shall be in writing and include, at a minimum, the following information:

(A) The name and address ofthe owneror operator responsible forthe implementation ofthe control plan. (B) Identification ofall:

(i) open aggregate pile areas; (ii) paved roads; and (iii) unpaved roads; that have the potential to emitfugitive particulate matteremissions in accordance with subsection 

### (d). (C) A map ofthe ArcelorMittal Burns Harbor LLC propertyshowingthe following:

(i) Open aggregate pile areas. (ii) Access areas around the open aggregate piles. (iii) Unpaved roads. (iv) Paved roads. (D) The quantity andtypes ofvehicularactivity occurring on thefollowing:

(i) Paved roads. 

### (ii) Unpaved roads. (E) Quantity ofopen aggregate piles that have the potential to emitfugitive particulate matter emissions. (F) The equipment used to maiJ'!tain open aggregate piles. (G) A description ofthe control measures to be implemented to control fugitive particulate matter emissions resulting from potential emission points identified in clause (B). (H) A specification ofthe dustsuppressant material thatwill be used, such as oil orchemical, includingthe estimated frequency and rates ofapplication, rates, and concentrations ofthedust suppressant. (I) 

### A specification ofthe particulate matter collection equipmentthatwill be used as a fugitive particulate matteremission control measure. (J) A schedule ofcompliance with the provisions ofthe control plan. The schedule shall specifythe amountoftime the source requiresto: ·

(i) award any necessary contracts; and 

### (ii) commence and complete construction, installation, or modification ofthe fugitive particulate matteremission control measures. · (K) Other relevant datathat may be requested bythe commissionerto evaluate the effectiveness of the control plan. (2) Records that documentall control measures and activitiesto be implemented in accordance with the approved control plan shall be: (A) kept and maintained atArcelorMittal Burns Harbor LLC; (B) retained for at leastfive (5) years; and (C) made available upon the request ofthe commissioner. (d) All control measures specified in this subsection shall be considered RACM. The frequency of application forall control measures shall be detailed in the control plan. No control plan shall contain control measures thatviolate the applicable provisions ofstate statutes orrules. Fugitive particulate matteremissionsfrom the emission points specified in this section shall be controlled as follows: (1) Paved roads and unpaved roads as follows:

Date: May 22,2009 7:52:35AM EDT DIN: 20090513-IR-326070088PRA PageS

### Indiana Register {A) Paved roads bythe use ofone {1) or more ofthe following measures:

{i) Cleaning byvacuum sweeping. {ii) Flushing. 

### {iii) An alternate RACM that is equivalent in effectiveness to either item {i) or {ii). {B) Unpaved roads, bythe use ofone {1) or more ofthe following measures:

{i) Paving with a material such as asphalt or concrete. 

### {ii) Treating with a suitable and effective commercially available petroleum based dustsuppressant orwater based dustsuppressant. The frequency ofapplication shall be on an as needed basis. 

### {iii) Spraying with water. The frequency ofapplication shall be on an-as needed basis. {iv) Double chip and seal the road surface and maintain on an as needed basis. {v) An alternate RACM that is equivalent in effectiveness to one {1) or more ofthe above measures. {2) Open aggregate piles bythe use ofone {1) or more ofthe following measures:

{A) Cleaning the area around the perimeter ofthe aggregate piles. {B) Applying a suitable and effective oil orother dustsuppressant on an as needed basis. {C) An alternate RACM that is equivalent in effectiveness to one {1) or more ofthe above measures. {e) The approval ofthe control plan shall be in accordance with the following: {1) Within three {3) months of receiving a control plan, the commissionershall notifyArcelorMittal Burns Harbor LLC of:

{A) the approval ofthe control plan; {B) modifications thatthe commissioner deems necessary to the control plan; or {C) disapproval ofthe control plan. · {2) Ifthe commissionerfinds a control plan to be incomplete, ArcelorMittal Burns Harbor LLC shall provide the commissionerwith the required add.itional information. {3) In determining ifan alternate control measure represents a RACM as specified in this section, ArcelorMittal Burns Harbor LLC shall submit and the commissionershall consider information pertaining tofactors, including, but not limited to, the following:

{A) The impact onthe environment in terms ofany increase in water, air, orsolidwaste pollution emissions. {B) The energy requirements ofthe selected control measure. {C) The:

{i) capital expenditure; 

### {ii) impacton production; and 

### {iii) operating costs; to implementthe selected control measure. {D) The impact ofthese costs. {4) Ifa control plan is disapproved bythe commissioner, ArcelorMittal Burns Harbor LLC shall have up tothirty 

### {30) days from the date of receipt ofthe disapproval letterto request, in writing, a hearing on the matter. In the eventa hearing is requested: {A) itshall be held in accordancewith the requirements setforth in IC 

### 4-21.5; and {B) the burden ofproofshall lie with ArcelorMittal Burns Harbor LLC to demonstrate whythe control plan is appropriate. {5) The control plan approved bythe commissionershall become part ofArcelorMittal Burns Harbor LLC's operating permit. {6) Changes may be madetothe control plan without reopening the operating permit by submitting a revised control plan tothe commissionerfor approval in accordance with this subsection.


### {f) The control plan shall be updated atthe time of reapplication forthe source's operating permit or as required in 

### 326 lAC 

### 2.

*These documents are incorporated by reference. The documents are available for review and copying atthe Indiana Department of Environmental Management, Office ofAirQuality, Indiana Government Center North, Tenth Floor, 

### 100 North Senate Avenue, Indianapolis, Indiana

### 46204. (AirPollution ControlBoard; 3261AC 6-6-5; filed Mar 10, 1988, 1:20p.m.: 111R2510; readopted filedJan 10, 2001, 3:20p.m.: 241R 1477)

SECTION 2. 3261AC 7-4-141S AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:

Date: May22,2009 7:52:35AM EDT DIN: 20090513-IR-326070088PRA Page6 

# •

•

•

# •

•

• Indiana Register 326 lAC 7-4-14 Porter County sulfur dioxide emission limitations Authority: IC 13-14-8; IC 13-17 Affected: IC 13-15

Sec. 14. The following sources and facilities located in Porter County shall comply with the sulfur dioxide emission limitations in pounds per million Btu (lbs/MMBtu) and pounds per hour (lbs/hr), unless otherwise specified, and other requirements: · (1) Bethlehem Steel ArcelorMittal Burns Harbor

### Wefksi. LLC shall complywith the following:

(A) The following facilities shall burn natural gas only:

(i) BOF Shop FM Boiler. (ii) 160 inch Plate Mill Continuous Hardening and Annealing Heat Treatment Furnace. (iii) 160 inch Plate Mill Boilers No.2 and 4. (iv) Batch Annealing Furnaces (24). (v) Continuous Heat Treat Line

- Preheat, Heating and Soaking, and Reheat. (B) The following facilities shall comply with the sulfur dioxide emission limitations and other requirements:

Facility Description (i) Blast Furnace C Stoves (ii) Blast Furnace D Stoves (iii) Blast Furnace Flare 

### (iY) (iii) Sinter Plant Windbox 

## M (iv) No. 1 Coke Battery Underfire 

### fYij (v) No. 2 Coke Battery Underfire**~** (vi) Slab Mill Soaking Pits: Emission Limitations lbs/MMBtu 0.83 0.83 

### G:G7 lbs/hr 545 545

1.0 pound perton process material 400 1.73 803 1.96 911 (AA) 

### Ne Not more than nine (9) ofthirty-two (32) horizontally discharged soaking pits may be fired on coke oven gas at the same time with total sulfur dioxide emissions notto exceed four hundred eighty-two (482) pounds per hour

. (BB) The remaining twenty-three (23) ofthirty-two (32) horizontally discharged soaking pits may burn blast furnace 

### OAEIIeF or natural gas, or both, with total sulfur dioxide emissions not to exceed twenty-four (24) pounds per hour. (CC) The four (4) vertically discharged soaking pits may burn blast furnace 

### OAEIIeF or natural gas, or both, with total sulfur dioxide emissions not to exceed four (4) pounds per hour. 

### WitH {vii) 160 inch Plate Mill Continuous Reheat Furnace 1.96 

### No: 1 and Boiler No. 1 fflE} (viii) 160 inch Plate Mill Continuous Reheat Furnace 1.96 

## No. :2 and Boiler No. 3 299
299 

## W (ix) 80 inch Hot Strip Mill Furnace No. 1, 2, and 3 1.96 79 each**~** (x) 110 inch Plate Mill Furnaces No. 1 and 2 1.96 441**~** (xi) 110 inch Plate Mill Normalizing Furnace 1.07 88**~** (xii) 160 inch Plate Mill I & 

### 0 Furnaces No.4 and 5 1.96 274**~** (xiii) 160 inch Plate Mill I & 

### 0 Furnaces No. 6 and 7 1.96 27 4**~** (xiv) 160 inch Plate Mill I 

### &

### 0 Furnace No. 8 1.96 176**~** (xv) Power Station Boiler No.7 0.8 520**~** (xvi) Power Station Boilers No. 8, 9, 10, 11, and 12 1.45 2,798 (C) As an alternative to the sulfur dioxide emission limitations specified in clause (B), Bethlehem Steel ArcelorMittal Burns Harbor LLC shall comply with the sulfurdioxide emission limitations and other requirements as follows: Emission Limitations

Facility Description (i) Blast Furnace C Stoves (ii) Blast Furnace D Stoves 

### (iii) Blast Fumaee Flar=e lbs/MMBtu 0.75 0.75 lbs/hr 498 498 

### (iY) (iii) Sinter Plant Windbox 

## M (iv) No. 1 Coke Battery Underfire 

### fYij (v) No. 2 Coke Battery Underfire fYiH (vi) Slab Mill Soaking Pits: 

### gm 1.0 pound perton process material 400 1.57 730 1.78 828

Date: May 22,2009 7:52:35AM EDT DIN: 20090513-IR-326070088PRA Page7Indiana Register 

### (AA) Ne Not more than six (6) ofthirty-two (32) horizontally discharged soaking pits may be fired on coke oven gas at the same time with total sulfur dioxide emissions not to exceed two hundred ninety-two (292) pounds per hour. (BB) The remaining twenty-six (26) ofthirty-two (32) horizontally discharged soaking pits may burn blast furnace 

### 9REIIeF or natural gas, or both, with total sulfur dioxide emissions not to exceed twenty-seven (27) pounds per hour. (CC) The four (4) vertically discharged soaking pits may burn blast furnace 

### 9REIIeF or natural gas, or both, with total sulfur dioxide emissions not to exceed four (4) pounds per hour. 

### tYiiH (vii) 160 inch Plate Mill Continuous Reheat Furnace 1.78 

### No: 1 and Boiler No. 1 

### fi*t (viii) 160 inch Plate Mill Continuous Reheat Furnace 1.78 No.**~** and Boiler No. 3 293
293 

## W (ix) 80 inch Hot Strip Mill Furnace No. 1, 2, and 3 1.78 483 each**~** (x) 110 inch Plate Mill Furnaces No. 1 and 2 1.78 401**~** (xi) 110 inch Plate Mill Normalizing Furnace 1.07 88 

### (*iil1 (xii) 160 inch Plate Mill I & 

### 0 Furnaces No. 4 and 5 1.78 249 If 160 inch Plate Mill I 

### &

### 0 Furnaces No.6

### aREiteF or 7, or both, are in operation on a fuel otherthan natural gas, Furnaces No.4 and 5 shall not operate or shall burn natural gas only.**~** (xiii) 160 inch Plate Mill I & 

### 0 Furnaces No.6 and 7 1.78 249 If 160 inch Plate Mill I & 

### 0 Furnaces No.4

### aREiteF or 5, or both, are in operation on a fuel otherthan natural gas, Furnaces No.6 and 7 shall notoperate or shall burn natural gas only. 

### (*Yt (xiv) 160 inch Plate Mill I 

### &

### 0 Furnace No. 8 1.78 160**~** (xv) Power Station Boilers No. 7 0.8 520**~** (xvi) Power Station Boilers No. 8, 9, 10, 11, and 12 1.45 total 2,500 total (M'l'iii) Betl'llel'lem Steel (xvii) ArcelorMittal Burns Harbor LLC shall notify the department at least twenty-four (24) hours prior to reliance on the alternative set of limits specified in items (i)**through~** Betl'llel'lem Steel (xvi). ArcelorMittal Burns Harbor LLC shall maintain records offuel type and operational status offacilities listed in items (xii) and (xiii) 

### aAel (lEi¥) and shall make the records available to the department upon request.**~** (xviii) For the purposes of326 lAC 7-2-1(c)(2), compliance shall be determined based on separate calendar month averages forthe set of requirements specified in this clause and forthe set of requirements specified in clause (B). (D) Coke oven gas usage atfacilities otherthan the No. 1 and 2 Coke Battery Underfire Stacks shall be restricted to fl& not more than seventy-five (75) million cubic feet per day. Total sulfur dioxide emissions from the facilities listed in clause (B)(i) through (B)(iv), (B)(vii)(l\-A) ti'!Fel:l!iJI'I (B)(vii)(BB), (B)(viii) tl'lrol:l!iJI'I**~** (B)(iii), (B)(vi)(AA) through (B)(vi)(BB), (B)(vii) through (B)(x), and (B)(>Eiii) ti'IFOI:I!iJI'I (B)(Mvii) (B)(xii) through (B)(xvi) shall not exceed four thousand four hundred twenty-nine (4,429) pounds per hour. During periods in which the limits contained in clause (C) are in effect, coke oven gas usage at facilities otherthan the No. 1 and 2 Coke Battery Underfire Stacks shall be restricted to R& not more than seventy (70) million cubic feet per day, and total sulfur dioxide emissions from the facilities listed in clause (C)(i) through (C)(iv), (C)(vii)(,6

### A) ti'IFel:l!iJI'I (C)(vii)(BB), (C)(•tiii) ti'IFel:l!iJI'I (C)(lEi), (C)(iii), (C)(vi)(AA) through (C)(vi)(BB), (C)(vii) through (C)(x), and (C)(lEiii) ti'IFOI:I!iJI'I (C)(lE¥ii) (C)(xii) through (C)(xvi) shall not exceed fourthousand six hundred thirty (4,630) pounds per hour. (E) Betl'llel'lem Steel ArcelorMittal Burns Harbor LLC shall achieve compliance with the requirements specified in clause (B) or (C) prior to December 31, 1988. Thereafter, Betl'llel'lem Steel ArcelorMittal Burns Harbor LLC shall submit a report to the departmentwithin thirty (30) days following the end ofeach calendar quarter containing the following information:

(i) Records ofthe total coke oven gas, blastfurnace gas, fuel oil, and natural gas usage for each day at each facility listed in clauses (B) ti'IFel:l!iJI'I and (C). (ii) Records ofthe:

(AA) average sulfur content and heating value as determined perthe procedures specified in clause (F) for each fuel type used during the calendar quarter; and 

### eHf::le ' (BB) maximum numberofslab mill soaking pits burning coke oven gas at any given time during each day. (iii) The calculated sulfur dioxide emission rate in the applicable emission units (pounds per hour, pounds per million Btu, 

### 9REIIeF or pounds perton) for each facility for each day and the average sulfur dioxide emissions from the facilities listed in clause (C)(i) through (C)(iv),**(C)(vii)~AA)** ti'IFel:l!iJI'I (C)(•tii)(BB), (C)(viii) ti'IFei:J!iJI'I (C)(Mi), (C)(iii), (C)(vi)(AA) through (C)(vi)(BB), (C)(vii) through (C)(x), and (C)(lEiii) ti'IFei:J!iJI'I (C)(MVii), (C)(xii) through (C)(xvi) for each day in pounds per hourduring the calendar quarter. (F) Betl'llel'lem Steel ArcelorMittal Burns Harbor LLC shall submit a sampling and analysis protocol to the department by December 31, 1988. The protocol shall:

Date: May 22,2009 7:52:35AM EDT DIN: 20090513-IR-326070088PRA PageS 

# •

•

•

# •

•

• Indiana Register {i} contain a description of planned procedures for:

{AA} sampling ofsulfur-bearing fuels and materials; 

### fef {BB} analysis ofthe sulfur content; and 

### fef {CC} any planned direct measurement ofsulfur dioxide emissions vented to the atmosphere; Tl=le J3FOtoool sl=la#and 

### {ii) specifythe frequency ofsampling, analysis, 

### aAEYeF and measurement for each:

{AA} fuel and material; and for eaol=l {BB} facility. The department shall incorporate the protocol into the source's operation permit per procedures specifiec;l in 326 lAC 2. The department may revise the protocol as necessary to establish acceptable sampling, analysis, 

### aAEYeF and measurements procedures and frequency. The department may also require that a source conduct a stack test at any facility listed in this subdivision within thirty (30) days ofwritten notification by the department. (2) Northern Indiana Public Service Company Bailly Station shall complywith the following:

Facility Description (A) Boilers 7 and 8 Boilers 7 and 8 shall be fired with coal, fuel oil, or natural gas. (B) Gas Turbine 10 (3) Midwest Steel shall complywith the following: Emission Limitations lbs/MMBtu 6.0 each
natural gas only

Emission Limitations Facility Description lbs/MMBtu Babcock and Wilcox Boiler 1 and Erie City Boilers No. 1, 2, and 3 1.33 each Onlytwo (2) offour (4) boilers may burn fuel oil with a sulfur dioxide emission rate greaterthan three-tenths (0.3) pounds per million Btu atthe same time. Midwest Steel shall maintain records offuel type for each boiler for each hour. The records offuel type shall be made available to the department upon request. (4) Air Products and Chemical shall complywith the following:

Facility Description Emission Limitations All boilers and the No. 3 Hydrogen Reformer natural gas only (AirPollution ControlBoard; 3261AC 7-4-14; filedAug28, 1990, 4:50p.m.: 141R 78; readopted filedJan 10, 2001, 3:20p.m.: 24/R 1477; errata filed Dec 12, 2002, 3:35p.m.: 261R 1568)



### Notice of Public Hearing

Posted: 05/1312009 byLegislative Services Agency 

### An 

## .!llm! version ofthis document.

Date: May 22,2009 7:52:35AM EDT DIN: 20090513-IR-326070088PRA Page9

# •

•

•

# ATTACHMENT 

# JI

# I I

# I

## • ADMINISTRATIVE CHECKLIST (40 CFR51, Appendix V)



# •

• 1. The submittal is accompaniedbya formal letter ofsubmittal Enclosed from the governor orhis designee.
2. Evidence that the Statehas adopted the planinthe State code Attachment B or body ofregulations; orissued the permit, order, consent agreement ("document"); in final form.

a. Date ofadoption or final issuance: July 1, 2009
b. The effective date oftheplan, ifdifferent October 29, 2009 from the adoption/issuance date.
3. Evidence that the State has the necessary legal authority IC 13-14-8 under state law to adopt and implement the plan.
4. A copy ofthe actual regulation or document submitted for Attachment A approval and incorporationbyreference into the plan, including the following:

a. Indication ofthe changes made to the existing approved plan, where applicable.
b. The submittal shall be a copyofthe official State regulation ordocument signed, stamped, datedby the appropriate state official indicating that it is fully enforceablebythe State. Effective date shall be stated in the document itself.
5. Evidence that the State followed all ofthe procedural requirements ofthe State's laws and constitutionin conducting and completingthe adoption/issuance oftheplan. Attachment B

6. Evidence thatpublic notice was given, including date of Attachment D proofofpublication. _X_Notice ofFirstPublic Hearing and Publishers' Affidavits _X_Notice ofSecondPublic Hearing and Publishers' Affidavits _X_Notice ofThird Public Hearing and Publishers' Affidavits

### 7. Certification that public hearings wereheld in accordance with informationprovided inpublic hearing notice. _X_

### Transcript from FirstPublic Hearing _X_

### Transcript from SecondPublic Hearing _X_

### Transcript from Third Public Hearing

8. Compilation ofpublic comments and State'sresponse. X SecondNotice

_N/ A_ProposedRule N/ A Third CommentPeriod

- - 

### 9. Technical SupportDocument (ifsource specific change). Attachments E, F, and G 

# •

Attachments H and I



### N/A



# •

•