alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 835 

To require the Supreme Court of the United States to promulgate a code 

of ethics. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 5 (legislative day, APRIL 4), 2017 

Mr. MURPHY (for himself, Mr. BLUMENTHAL, Mr. WHITEHOUSE, Mr. MARKEY, Ms. HIRONO, Mr. DURBIN, and Mr. MERKLEY) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the 

Judiciary 

A BILL 

To require the Supreme Court of the United States to 

promulgate a code of ethics. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Supreme Court Ethics 

5 Act of 2017’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FINDINGS; PURPOSE. 

7 (a) FINDINGS.—Congress finds the following: 

8 (1) In Caperton v. A.T. Massey Coal Co., 556 

9 U.S. 868 (2009), Justice Kennedy, writing for the 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 835 IS

1 Court, stated that ‘‘[judicial codes of conduct] serve 

2 to maintain the integrity of the judiciary and the 

3 rule of law’’. 

4 (2) The Code of Conduct for United States 

5 Judges (referred to in this subsection as the 

6 ‘‘Code’’) applies to all Federal judges except Justices 

7 of the Supreme Court. Justices of the Supreme 

8 Court are not formally bound by any code of con9 duct. Chief Justice John Roberts noted in the 2011 

10 Year-End Report on the Federal Judiciary that 

11 while the Judicial Conference, which promulgates 

12 the Code, does not have authority to bind the Su13 preme Court, the Code is nonetheless ‘‘the starting 

14 point and a key source of guidance for the Justices 

15 as well as their lower court colleagues’’. 

16 (3) Congress has the authority to regulate the 

17 administration of the Supreme Court of the United 

18 States. For example, Congress sets the number of 

19 Justices who sit on the Supreme Court and how 

20 many constitute a quorum, the term of the court, 

21 meaning the dates the court will be in session, and 

22 the salaries of the Justices. Additionally, the Ethics 

23 in Government Act of 1978 (5 U.S.C. App.) requires 

24 most high-level Federal officials in all 3 branches, 

25 including the President, Vice President, cabinet 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 835 IS

1 members, Justices of the Supreme Court, and Mem2 bers of Congress, to file annual financial disclosure 

3 statements. 

4 (b) PURPOSE.—The purpose of this Act is to apply 

5 a code of ethics to Justices who sit on the Supreme Court 

6 of the United States, being mindful of their preeminence 

7 in the Federal judiciary. 

8 SEC. 3. SUPREME COURT CODE OF ETHICS. 

9 The Supreme Court of the United States shall, not 

10 later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this 

11 Act, promulgate a code of ethics for the Justices of the 

12 Supreme Court that shall include the 5 canons of the Code 

13 of Conduct for United States Judges adopted by the Judi14 cial Conference of the United States, with any amend15 ments or modifications thereto that the Supreme Court 

16 determines appropriate. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
207.103 Agency-head responsibilities. ( d ) ( i ) Prepare written acquisition plans for— ( A ) Acquisitions for development, as defined in FAR 35.001, when the total cost of all contracts for the acquisition program is estimated at $10 million or more;
( B ) Acquisitions for production or services when the total cost of all contracts for the acquisition program is estimated at $50 million or more for all years or $25 million or more for any fiscal year; and
( C ) Any other acquisition considered appropriate by the department or agency.
( ii ) Written plans are not required in acquisitions for a final buy out or one-time buy. The terms “final buy out” and “one-time buy” refer to a single contract that covers all known present and future requirements. This exception does not apply to a multiyear contract or a contract with options or phases.
( e ) Prepare written acquisition plans for acquisition programs meeting the thresholds of paragraphs (d)(i)(A) and (B) of this section on a program basis. Other acquisition plans may be written on either a program or an individual contract basis.
( g ) The program manager, or other official responsible for the program, has overall responsibility for acquisition planning.
( h ) For procurement of conventional ammunition, as defined in DoDD 5160.65, Single Manager for Conventional Ammunition (SMCA), the SMCA will review the acquisition plan to determine if it is consistent with retaining national technology and industrial base capabilities in accordance with 10 U.S.C. 3204(a)(3) and section 806 of Public Law 105-261. The department or agency— ( i ) Shall submit the acquisition plan to the address in PGI 207.103(h); and
( ii ) Shall not proceed with the procurement until the SMCA provides written concurrence with the acquisition plan. In the case of a non-concurrence, the SMCA will resolve issues with the Army Office of the Executive Director for Conventional Ammunition.
[71 FR 53045, Sept. 8, 2006, as amended at 71 FR 58537, Oct. 4, 2006; 87 FR 76990, Dec. 16, 2022]
# 2011 FOIA Log
**REGULAR & SUBSTANTIVE INTERACTION DEFINITIONS**

Draft

**Definition of distance learning:**

Education that uses one or more of the technologies listed in paragraphs (1)(i) through (1)(iv) of this definition to deliver instruction to students who are separated from the instructor or members of an instructional team, and to support regular and substantive interaction between the students and the instructor or members of an instructional team, either synchronously or asynchronously. 

(1) The technologies that may be used to deliver distance education include—

(i) The internet;

(ii) One-way and two-way transmissions through open broadcast, closed circuit, cable, microwave, broadband lines, fiber optics, satellite, or wireless communications devices;

(iii) Audio conferencing; or

(iv) Other media used in a course in conjunction with any of the technologies listed in paragraphs (1) through (3) of this definition.

**Definition of regular:**

(3) *Regular*means the frequency or periodicity of contact that is established by the institution, in which –

(i) The interactions are initiated by an instructor or a member of an instructional team; and

(ii) Interactions cover the student’s period of engagement with the course with a frequency and periodicity determined by the institution and that cover the period of time prior to the student’s completion of all required assignments or demonstration of competency. The frequency and periodicity may differ based on the needs of individual programs.

**Definition of substantive:***Substantive*means related to the subject matter under discussion for the course or competency.

**Definition of interaction:** Interactions occur between the students and the instructor or members of the instructional team, students with other students, and students with the subject matter through adaptive and artificial intelligence technologies, either synchronously or asynchronously. 

**Definition of instructional team**:

(2)(i) An instructional team is led by a qualified subject-matter expert, as defined by the institution or the accrediting agency, and may include one or more staff members without faculty credentials that perform an instructional function both curricular and co-curricular. Members of an instructional team may have different and complementary roles and qualifications, as required by the institution’s accrediting agency, such as to share information, answer questions, provide direct instruction, provide assessment or feedback, monitor a student’s academic progress, or provide student support related the student’s success in a particular course, competency, or educational program using both human and artificial intelligence means. The qualified subject-matter expert has primary responsibility for overseeing (a) assessment of student learning and mastery of course content and (b) monitoring of students’ academic engagement and success and for promptly and proactively providing academic assistance, when needed, on the basis of such monitoring or upon request by the student.
P140395.en1

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 14-0395 

Post-Focus Draft Revision 1 8/7/2014

ENGINEER: Hall \ REC 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Page 1
P140395.en1

 

 

 

SAT (concerns) (03/14/2014):

Related Cases and Misc SAT Info: 

 

Migration to groundwater: Negligible 

PBT rating: P2B1T1 

Health: 1-2 Inhalation 

Eco: 2 Water (All releases to water with a CC = 18 ppb) 



Page 2
P140395.en1

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 1-2B

NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS: 

Generated by the 09/30/2013 version of ChemSTEER. 

POLLUTION PREVENTION CONSIDERATIONS:

None.

EXPOSURE-BASED REVIEW: No 

Page 3
P140395.en1

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 14-0395 

 

Page 4
P140395.en1

 



Page 5
P140395.en1

Page 6
P140395.en1

Page 7
P140395.en1

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 14-0395 

 

 

Page 8
P140395.en1



Page 9
P140395.en1

 

 

 

 

Page 10
P140395.en1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page 11
P140395.en1

Page 12
#### In the Matter of James W. Skahan et al., Petitioners, v. Robert P. Slocum et al., Constituting the Board of Supervisors of Rockland County, Respondents.

Proceeding pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules, to review a determination of the respondent Rockland County Board of Supervisors, made December 26, 1963 after public hearing, establishing the Rockland County Sewer District No. 1. By order of the Supreme Court, Rock-land County, made April 3, 1964 pursuant to statute (CPLR 7804, subd. [g]), the proceeding has been transferred to this court for disposition. Determination confirmed, without costs (see *Matter of Noyes*v. *Slocum,*21 A D 2d 802). Motion by petitioners for a trial by jury, a pretrial examination of respondents Mundt and Slocum and for leave to file a posttrial supplemental brief, denied. Beldock, P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 5.1.1

Eastern Division

Joe John Giacalone

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:12−cv−01192

Honorable Charles P. Kocoras

Experian, et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Tuesday, April 23, 2013:

 MINUTE entry before Honorable Charles P. Kocoras:Motion hearing held on

4/23/2013. Defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc.'s ("defendant") motion (Doc

[49]) for leave to file brief in excess of fifteen pages in support of it39;s motion for

summary judgment, is granted. Plaintiff's motion (Doc [47]) to strike defendant's

opposition to plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment is denied. Defendant's

motion (Doc [45]) to strike inadmissible letters from Bank of America and Capital One is

granted. Plaintiff is given to 5/9/2013 to file one document containing both a reply to his

motion (Doc [32]) for partial summary judgment, and answer to defendant's motion (Doc

[42]) for summary judgment. Plaintiff's said brief is limited to 25 pages. Defendant's reply

in support of its motion (Doc [42]) for summary judgment is due 5/23/2013, and is limited

to 15 pages. Ruling set for 5/23/2013 is stricken. The Court will rule by mail.Mailed

notice(sct, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:12-cv-01192 Document #: 52 Filed: 04/23/13 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:574
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

                - P-12
                - Carrera Universitaria
                - Educación Para Adultos
                - Derechos Civiles
                - Educación Especial
                - Noticias

----

La formación universitaria es una inversión a largo plazo. Con la planificación cuidadosa puede encontrar la institución y las alternativas para costear los estudios que mejor se adapten a su situación y que lo pondrán en el camino al éxito.

College Navigator: Encuentra la universidad adecuada para ti

Ayuda federal para estudiantes

Solicitud Gratuita de Ayuda Federal Para Estudiantes (FAFSA): La única aplicación que usted necesitará para recibir ayuda financiera federal.

College Scorecard: Busque y compare universidades: sus campos de estudio, costos, admisiones, resultados y más.

Normas de preparación para la universidad y el trabajo

Becas federales - Conozca los programas de subvenciones que están disponibles en el Departamento de Educación de los Estados Unidos.

Como pagar sus prestamos Antes de que se inicien los pagos, debe desarrollar un plan que lo ponga en marcha para pagar su préstamo a tiempo y en su totalidad.

Agencia estatal de educación superior también puede obtener ayuda financiera y recursos en tu estado.

Vea más información en españolCentro de Recursos de InformaciónTeléfono 1-800-872-5327 o 202-401-2000Correo electrónico

----

 

 Printable view

## How Do I Find...

          - Student loans, forgiveness
          - Higher Education Rulemaking
          - College accreditation
          - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
          - FERPA
          - FAFSA
          - 1098, tax forms

More >

## Information About...

          - Elevating Teaching
          - Early Learning
          - Engage Every Student
          - Unlocking Career Success
          - Cybersecurity

 

----

*Our mission*

Student Loans
Repaying LoansDefaulted LoansLoan ForgivenessLoan Servicers

Grants & Programs
Apply for Pell GrantsGrants ForecastApply for a Grant

Laws & Guidance
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)FERPACivil RightsNew IDEA Website

Data & Research
Education StatisticsPostsecondary Education DataED Data ExpressNation's Report CardWhat Works ClearinghouseOpen Data PlatformCOVID Relief Data

About Us
Contact UsED OfficesJobsPress ReleasesFAQsRecursos en españolBudget, PerformancePrivacy Program

----

          - Notices
          - FOIA
          - Privacy Policy
          - Accessibility
          - Security
          - Information quality
          - Inspector General
          - Whitehouse.gov
          - USA.gov
          - Benefits.gov
          - Regulations.gov
          - vote.gov
15.200 Scope of subpart. This subpart prescribes policies and procedures for— ( a ) Exchanging information with industry prior to receipt of proposals;
( b ) Preparing and issuing requests for proposals (RFPs) and requests for information (RFIs); and
( c ) Receiving proposals and information.
15.505 Preaward debriefing of offerors. Offerors excluded from the competitive range or otherwise excluded from the competition before award may request a debriefing before award (10 U.S.C. 3305 and 41 U.S.C. 3705). ( a ) ( 1 ) The offeror may request a preaward debriefing by submitting a written request for debriefing to the contracting officer within 3 days after receipt of the notice of exclusion from the competition.
( 2 ) At the offeror's request, this debriefing may be delayed until after award. If the debriefing is delayed until after award, it shall include all information normally provided in a postaward debriefing (see 15.506(d)). Debriefings delayed pursuant to this paragraph could affect the timeliness of any protest filed subsequent to the debriefing.
( 3 ) If the offeror does not submit a timely request, the offeror need not be given either a preaward or a postaward debriefing. Offerors are entitled to no more than one debriefing for each proposal.
( b ) The contracting officer shall make every effort to debrief the unsuccessful offeror as soon as practicable, but may refuse the request for a debriefing if, for compelling reasons, it is not in the best interests of the Government to conduct a debriefing at that time. The rationale for delaying the debriefing shall be documented in the contract file. If the contracting officer delays the debriefing, it shall be provided no later than the time postaward debriefings are provided under 15.506. In that event, the contracting officer shall include the information at 15.506(d) in the debriefing.
( c ) Debriefings may be done orally, in writing, or by any other method acceptable to the contracting officer.
( d ) The contracting officer should normally chair any debriefing session held. Individuals who conducted the evaluations shall provide support.
( e ) At a minimum, preaward debriefings shall include— ( 1 ) The agency's evaluation of significant elements in the offeror's proposal;
( 2 ) A summary of the rationale for eliminating the offeror from the competition; and
( 3 ) Reasonable responses to relevant questions about whether source selection procedures contained in the solicitation, applicable regulations, and other applicable authorities were followed in the process of eliminating the offeror from the competition.
( f ) Preaward debriefings shall not disclose— ( 1 ) The number of offerors;
( 2 ) The identity of other offerors;
( 3 ) The content of other offerors proposals;
( 4 ) The ranking of other offerors;
( 5 ) The evaluation of other offerors; or
( 6 ) Any of the information prohibited in 15.506(e).
( g ) An official summary of the debriefing shall be included in the contract file.
[62 FR 51230, Sept. 30, 1997, as amended at 79 FR 24202, Apr. 29, 2014; 87 FR 73898, Dec. 1, 2022]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> OPUR1
<CIK> 0000318819
<NAME> W. TIMOTHY POHL
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                    3,713,390
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                    114,663
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         172,858
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                       272,891
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                  40,484
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,314,286
<COMMON>                                        99,607
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      325,566
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            717,243
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>               1,142,416
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           79,734
<PREFERRED>                                     17,929
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                         1,870,766
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                             134,762
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                   25,148
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>               1,043,531
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                4,314,286
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      954,199
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                            74,713
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     620,299
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     695,012
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                        259,187
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                               5,707
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                 264,894
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       145,766
<NET-INCOME>                                   119,128
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                      3,984
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                  115,144
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        60,084
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                      138,127
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         267,114
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.45
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.45
        

</TABLE>
#### Samuel J. Martin et al. v. Gregory Peck.

Motion for an enlargement of time granted insofar as to extend the plaintiff-appellant’s time to serve and file the record on appeal and appellant’s points to and including February 28, 1961, with notice of argument for the April 1961 Term of this court, said appeal to be argued or submitted when reached. Respondent’s points are to be served and filed on or before March 15, 1961. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, McNally, Stevens and Eager, JJ.
Exhibit
      32(c)








**CERTIFICATION
      FURNISHED PURSUANT TO**




**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**




**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**




**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report
      on Form 10-Q of Carolina Power & Light Company (the “Company”) for the
      period ending June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
      on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Lloyd M. Yates, President and Chief
      Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:




(1)           the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
      applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)           the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.











/s/
      Lloyd M. Yates


Lloyd
      M.
      Yates


President
      and Chief Executive Officer


August
      8,
      2007








This
      certification is being furnished and shall not be deemed filed by the Company
      for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
      or incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Exchange Act
      of
      1934, as amended, or the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
2129.305 State and local tax exemptions. ( a ) FAR 29.305 is modified for the FEGLI Program by substituting paragraph (b) of this section in the place of paragraph (b) of FAR 29.305.
( b ) *Furnishing proof of exemption.* If a reasonable basis to sustain a claimed exemption exists, the seller will be furnished evidence of exemption if requested by the contractor and approved by the contracting officer or at the discretion of the contracting officer.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6,1

Eastern Division

Jack Haught

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:12−cv−02515

Honorable Virginia M. Kendall

Motorola Mobility, Inc.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Thursday, November 20, 2014:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall: MOTION by Plaintiff

Jack Haught for settlement − Plaintiff Haught's Motion for Final Approval of Class

Action Settlement[83] is granted. MOTION by Plaintiff Jack Haught for attorney fees [81]

is granted. Advised in open court notice(tsa, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:12-cv-02515 Document #: 86 Filed: 11/20/14 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:841
#### 17.105 Policy.