alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION**

# OFFICE OF THE  SECRETARY

MEMORANDUM

TO:          Addressees (See Below)

FROM:Director, Risk Management Service

Office of the Secretary

SUBJECT: Redelegation of Authority for Grants and Cooperative Agreements 

I.DELEGATIONOFAUTHORITY

Under the authority vested in me from the Secretary by delegation EA/EAR/165, certified on March 26, 2008, and except as noted in section II below, I delegate to you, to your successor in function, and to anyone serving for you in an acting capacity, the authority to perform functions related to the award, management and oversight of formula and discretionary grants and cooperative agreements within your programmatic authority.  This includes the authority to take any action as deemed appropriate and necessary to manage and mitigate risks associated with high risk or at-risk grants and grantees, within your programmatic authority.

Unless otherwise noted in future delegations of authority, amendments to the authority delegated in this document are included within the scope of this delegation.

II. RESERVATIONS

 Unless otherwise noted in existing or future delegations of authority, the following are not delegated:

A.The authority to set administrative policy for formula and discretionary grants and cooperative agreements, including issuing Department directives, handbooks, and manuals relating to grants and cooperative agreements.

B.The authority to impose non-procurement debarments and suspensions and to manage enforcement of non-debarments and suspensions. 

Page 2 -  Redelegation of Authority for Grants and Cooperative Agreements

C.The authority to issue licenses to individuals to record obligations and award grant funds for discretionary grants and cooperative agreements.

D.        The authority as final arbiter on cross-Department risk management strategies developed to manage and mitigate risks associated with Department high-risk or at-risk grants and grantees. 

III.REDELEGATION

You may redelegate the authority delegated to you.

IV. CERTIFICATION AND EFFECTIVE DATE

This delegation is effective upon certification by the Department's Principal Delegations Control Officer and supersedes all previous delegations of this authority.  I ratify actions within the scope of this delegation taken by the addressees prior to the date of certification.

      _________/s/____________

                       Phil Maestri

OGC Clearance and Date:  3/28/2008

Certified Date:  4/11/2008

Departmental Delegations Control Officer:  /s/ Naty G. Beetle

Control Number:  EAR/EP/350

ADDRESSEE LIST:

Deputy Secretary   

Assistant Secretary for Special Education and Rehabilitative Services  

Assistant Secretary for Postsecondary Education  ◄▬▬

Assistant Deputy Secretary for Safe and Drug-Free Schools

Director, Institute of Education Sciences

Assistant Secretary for Elementary and Secondary Education

Assistant Deputy Secretary and Director for English Language Acquisition

Assistant Deputy Secretary for Innovation and Improvement

Assistant Secretary for Vocational and Adult Education
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying Form 10-Q (the "Report") of Jo-Ann Stores
Inc. (the "Company") for the period ending November 2, 2002, I, Alan Rosskamm,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.

Dated:  December 17, 2002


                                        /s/ Alan Rosskamm
                                        Alan Rosskamm,
                                        President and Chief Executive Officer

                                    Page 23
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM SECOND
QUARTER ENDED OCTOBER 31, 2000 SYNTHETIC BLOOD INTERNATIONAL, INC.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-2000
<CASH>                                       5,099,191
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,142,667
<PP&E>                                         238,087
<DEPRECIATION>                                  58,409
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,553,046
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          296,633
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       873,534
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,382,879
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,553,046
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               182,268
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               943,331
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,070
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (762,133)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (762,133)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   ($0.009)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 ($0.009)


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Dynamic Materials Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Yvon Pierre Cariou,President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 
| (i)    | The Report fully  complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934; and                               |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                   |
| (ii)   | The information  contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the  financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

 

 
|   | /s/ Yvon Pierre  Cariou                |   |
|--------|----------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Yvon Pierre  Cariou                    |
|   | President and  Chief Executive Officer |
|   | of  Dynamic Materials Corporation      |

 

 

November 9,2005

 

----
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

JAMES E. HENDERS, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) No. 12 C 1147

)

GREGG APPLIANCES, INC., )

)

Defendant. )

ORDER AUTHORIZING PAYMENT OF FEES TO PLAINTIFF’S COUNSEL 

PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1875(d)(1)

JAMES F. HOLDERMAN, Chief Judge:

The Clerk is authorized to reimburse attorney Richard J. Gonzalez of the Law Offices of 

Chicago-Kent College of Law from CJA funds the total amount of $2,872.50 under 18 U.S.C.

§ 3006A, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1875(d)(1). That amount covers 22.98 hours of legal work at the

CJA rate of $125.00 per hour.

The court extends its thanks to Mr. Gonzalez for his willingness to take on this appointed

representation and for his diligence in representing his client, Mr. James E. Henders.

_______________________________

JAMES F. HOLDERMAN

Chief Judge, United States District Court

Date: December 5, 2012

-1-

Case: 1:12-cv-01147 Document #: 40 Filed: 12/05/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:93
#### In the Matter of Candice Jones Ford, Appellant, v Krystal Tindal, Respondent.

[831 NYS2d 917]

In a family offense proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 8, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Family Court, Kings County (Hepner, J.), dated June 13, 2006, which, after a hearing, dismissed the petition.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law and the facts, *644without costs or disbursements, the petition is reinstated, and the matter is remitted to the Family Court, Kings County, for a dispositional hearing and the entry of an appropriate order of disposition.

Contrary to the Family Court’s determination, the petitioner established, by a fair preponderance of the evidence, that the respondent committed an act constituting harassment in the second degree, warranting the issuance of an order of protection against her *(see*Family Ct Act § 812 [1]; § 832; Penal Law § 240.26 [1]; *Matter of Clarke v Clarke,*8 AD3d 375 [2004]; *Matter of Marsha C. v Latoya D.,*224 AD2d 522 [1996]). Accordingly, we remit the matter to the Family Court, Kings County, for a dispositional hearing and the entry of an appropriate dispositional order *(see*Family Ct Act § 833). Spolzino, J.P., Krausman, Skelos and Dickerson, JJ., concur.
### §3154. Repealed. Pub. L. 110–234, title VII, §7110(a), May 22, 2008, 122 Stat. 1218, and Pub. L. 110–246, §4(a), title VII, §7110(a), June 18, 2008, 122 Stat. 1664, 1980

Section, Pub. L. 95–113, title XIV, §1419, Sept. 29, 1977, 91 Stat. 997; Pub. L. 96–294, title II, §252, June 30, 1980, 94 Stat. 705; Pub. L. 97–98, title XIV, §1422, Dec. 22, 1981, 95 Stat. 1306; Pub. L. 101–624, title XVI, §1609(a), Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 3718; Pub. L. 102–237, title IV, §402(7), Dec. 13, 1991, 105 Stat. 1863; Pub. L. 104–127, title VIII, §806, Apr. 4, 1996, 110 Stat. 1162; Pub. L. 105–185, title III, §301(a)(2), June 23, 1998, 112 Stat. 562; Pub. L. 107–171, title VII, §§7134, 7209(b), May 13, 2002, 116 Stat. 436, 445, related to grants for research on production and marketing of alcohols and industrial hydrocarbons from agricultural commodities and forest products.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Pub. L. 110–234 and Pub. L. 110–246 repealed this section. Pub. L. 110–234 was repealed by section 4(a) of Pub. L. 110–246.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal of this section and repeal of Pub. L. 110–234 by Pub. L. 110–246 effective May 22, 2008, the date of enactment of Pub. L. 110–234, see section 4 of Pub. L. 110–246, set out as an Effective Date note under section 8701 of this title.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.1


                                                      ONE DETROIT CENTER
                                                      P.O. BOX 75000
                                                      DETROIT, MI 48275-3265
                                                      PHONE: (313) 222-5431


                                                      ROBERT M. RAMIREZ
                                                      VICE PRESIDENT
                                                      U.S. BANKING - AUTOMOTIVE
                                                      FACSIMILE: (313) 222-3778



October 19, 2004



Mr. W.T. ZurSchmiede, Jr.
Chairman & Chief Financial Officer
Federal Screw Works
20229 Nine Mile Road
St. Clair Shores, MI 48080-1775


Dear Mr. ZurSchmiede,

Per your request dated September 14, 2002 and pursuant to Section 2.13 of the
Revolving Credit and Term Loan Agreement between Federal Screw Works and
Comerica Bank, the Bank has approved the one year extension for the Revolving
Credit Facility and Term Loan option.  The new maturity dates for the
facilities are October 31, 2007 and October 31, 2009, respectively.

Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions.  Thank you.



Regards,



/s/ Robert M. Ramirez
---------------------
Robert M. Ramirez


cc: Wade C. Plaskey
The Honorable Ray LaHood 

United States Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Dear Secretary LaHood: 

On behalf of Lear Corporation, I am writing to express our strong support for the 

application ofDelta Air Lines for new nonstop service between Detroit and Haneda. 

Approval of Delta's new service would be a major benefit for our region, where 

many corporations have strong trade and market presence with Japan. There are over 500 

Japanese companies located in Michigan and hundreds more whose business models rely 

on access to Japan and it's market. The growth ofour business ties with Japan has created 

demand for increased capacity to Tokyo. Our business travelers look to the convenience 

of flying into Tokyo's downtown Haneda airport. 

Detroit is a proven and successful gateway to Asia, and as an airport that can 

support trans-pacific routes. This summer Delta is adding new service to Seoul and Hong 

Kong, fulfilling the commitment Delta made to DTW to make it the airlines gateway to 

Asia. The addition of Haneda as a destination is a natural fit that would clearly benefit 

our business travelers. 

Thank you for consideration ofthis request.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-1035

ALBERT M. HARGROVE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

DOCTOR DETLEF STEINER, individually and

professionally, Clarendon National Insurance

Company; MIDWESTERN INSURANCE ALLIANCE,

INCORPORATED; CATHY ANN NEW, individually and

professionally, Midwestern Insurance Alliance,

Incorporated; NORMAN E. RISEN, individually

and professionally, Midwestern Insurance

Alliance, Incorporated; BATTS TEMPORARY

SERVICE, INCORPORATED, a/k/a Labor Works

Source, Incorporated; CLARENDON NATIONAL

INSURANCE COMPANY; THE CLARENDON GROUP,

Clarendon National Insurance Company, Redland

Insurance Company, Harbor Speciality Insurance

Company; HANNOVER LIFE REASSURANCE COMPANY OF

AMERICA; HANNOVER RUCKVERSICHERUNGSAKTIENGESELL-SCHAFT; GEORGE T. GLENN, Deputy

Commissioner, individual and official

capacity, and the North Carolina Industrial

Commission by and through the North Carolina

Department of Commerce; BUCK LATTIMORE,

individual and official capacity and the North

Carolina Industrial Commission by and through

the North Carolina Department of Commerce,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, Chief

District Judge. (CA-04-304-5-FL)
- 2 -

Submitted: March 24, 205 Decided: March 31, 2005

Before WIDENER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Albert M. Hargrove, Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer Susan Jerzak,

HEDRICK, EATMAN, GARDNER AND KINCHELOE, Raleigh, North Carolina;

Perry Cleveland Henson, Jr., HENSON & HENSON, L.L.P., Greensboro,

North Carolina; Robert Thomas Hargett, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF

JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 3 -

PER CURIAM:

Albert Hargrove appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his complaint alleging violations of state and

federal law in connection with the denial of his claim for state

workers’ compensation benefits. We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning

of the district court. See Hargrove v. Steiner, No. CA-04-304-5-FL

(E.D.N.C. Dec. 23, 2004). We further deny Hargrove’s motion for a

certificate of appealability pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2553(c) as

unnecessary to this appeal. We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# FFEL GA Volume

# Quarterly

# Historical
S. 583 

One Hundred Fifteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE FIRST SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and seventeen 

An Act 

To amend the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 to authorize 

COPS grantees to use grant funds to hire veterans as career law enforcement 

officers, and for other purposes. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘American Law Enforcement 

Heroes Act of 2017’’. 

SEC. 2. PRIORITIZING HIRING AND TRAINING OF VETERANS. 

Section 1701(b)(2) of title I of the Omnibus Crime Control 

and Safe Streets Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 3796dd(b)(2)) is amended 

by inserting ‘‘, including by prioritizing the hiring and training 

of veterans (as defined in section 101 of title 38, United States 

Code)’’ after ‘‘Nation’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-4908
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus MIGUEL MARTINEZ, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Patrick Michael Duffy, District Judge. (2:05-cr-01331-PMD) Submitted: August 30, 2007 Decided: September 5, 2007 Before MICHAEL, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Steven Michael Hisker, Duncan, South Carolina, for Appellant. Carlton R. Bourne, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Miguel Martinez pled guilty to conspiracy to distribute cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(A) (2000). He was sentenced to 262 months of imprisonment. Martinez’ attorney on appeal has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), concluding there are no meritorious issues for appeal, but questioning whether the district court erred in applying the sentencing guidelines as mandatory in violation of United States v. Booker , 543 U.S. 220 (2005). Because the district court in fact appropriately applied the guidelines as advisory in sentencing Martinez post-Booker, and advised him of the advisory nature of the guidelines at the plea hearing, we find counsel’s claim meritless. Martinez was advised of his right to file a pro se supplemental brief, but has not done so. In accordance with Anders , we have reviewed the entire record in this case and have found no meritorious issues for appeal. We therefore affirm Martinez’s conviction and sentence. This court requires that counsel inform his client, in writing, of his right to petition the Supreme Court of the United States for further review. If the client requests that a petition be filed, but counsel believes that such a petition would be frivolous, then counsel may move in this court for leave to withdraw from representation. Counsel’s motion must state that a copy thereof was served on the client. We- 3 - dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                  1000

<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-02-2000
<PERIOD-END>                            AUG-26-2000
<CASH>                                       10,309
<SECURITIES>                                 61,373
<RECEIVABLES>                                18,840
<ALLOWANCES>                                    400
<INVENTORY>                                  23,403
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            115,677
<PP&E>                                      132,133
<DEPRECIATION>                               99,160
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              152,801
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        12,428
<BONDS>                                         374
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         1,319
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<COMMON>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                  129,790
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                152,801
<SALES>                                      87,156
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             87,156
<CGS>                                        78,189
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                78,189
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              9,768
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                825
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               61
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               3,031
<INCOME-TAX>                                    836
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           2,195
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                  2,195
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0.41
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.41


</TABLE>
1301.303 Publication and codification. ( a ) The CAR parallels the FAR in format, arrangement and numbering system. Coverage within the CAR is identified by the prefix “13” or “130” followed by the complete FAR citation to the subsection level (*e.g.,* CAR coverage of FAR 1.602-1 is cited as 1301.602-1).
( b ) Supplementary material without a FAR counterpart will be codified using 70 and up as appropriate for the part, subpart, section, or subsection number (*e.g.,* part 1370, subpart 1301.70, section 1301.370 or subsection 1301.301-70).