alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7098

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

TYREES COLOZA WHITEHEAD,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge.

(CR-90-112, CA-95-1011)

Submitted: March 13, 1997 Decided: March 18, 1997

Before HALL, ERVIN, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tyrees C. Whitehead, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Wiley Miller, OFFICE

OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-

132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the district

court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Whitehead, Nos.

CR-90-112; CA-95-1011 (E.D. Va. May 13, 1996). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-2349

NANCY LEE BOGART,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

DIMITRA J. CURRY; GEICO INSURANCE COMPANY; NATIONWIDE INSURANCE COMPANY, Nationwide Mutual

Insurance Company & Affiliated Companies;

CHRISTOPHER W. BOGART,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, District

Judge. (CA-97-907)

Submitted: March 12, 1998 Decided: March 23, 1998

Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Nancy Lee Bogart, Appellant Pro Se. Daniel Lance Robey, ROBEY &

TEUMER, Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order granting Appellees' motions to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction

and denying Appellant's motion to reconsider. See 28 U.S.C.A.

§ 1332 (West 1993 & Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and

the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court and deny

Appellant's motion to compel Appellees to respond to interrogatories. Bogart v. Curry, No. CA-97-907 (E.D. Va. Aug. 13 & Sept. 8,

1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 99.1
                                                                    ------------

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Current Report on Form 10-Q of Claire's Stores, Inc.
(the  "Company")  for  the  quarterly period ended May 3, 2003 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Marla
Schaefer,  Acting  Co-Chief  Executive  Officer  of the Company, hereby certify,
pursuant  to  18  U.S.C.  Sec.  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to Sec. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that:

(1)  The  Report  fully  complies  with  the requirements  of section  13(a)  or
15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

(2)  The  information contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all  material
respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results of operations of the Company.


                                             /s/  Marla  Schaefer
                                             --------------------
                                                  Marla  Schaefer
                                                  Acting  Co-Chief  Executive
                                                  Officer
                                                  June  16,  2003


<PAGE>


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Current Report on Form 10-Q of Claire's Stores, Inc.
(the  "Company")  for  the  quarterly period ended May 3, 2003 as filed with the
Securities  and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Bonnie
Schaefer,  Acting  Co-Chief  Executive  Officer  of the Company, hereby certify,
pursuant  to  18  U.S.C.  Sec.  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to Sec. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that:

(1)  The  Report  fully  complies  with  the  requirements of section  13(a)  or
15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents,  in  all  material
respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results of operations of the Company.

                                             /s/  E.  Bonnie  Schaefer
                                             -------------------------
                                                  E.  Bonnie  Schaefer
                                                  Acting  Co-Chief  Executive
                                                  Officer
                                                  June  16,  2003
### . :· May 30,2012
•'. ' '. Docket Management Facility US Department

## of:Transp6rtation 1200 New.Jersey Avenue, SE West Building Ground Floor Room.W12-i40 Washington, D.E 20590 Your Wayto Fly

.... '

. . . 

## PETITION FOR EXEMPTION Company Identification Tulip City Air Service, Inc. Ronald Ludema President 1581 SWashington Ave Holland, Ml 49423.
Anti-drug and Alcohol Plan Number E-EA-00010-U ·;.

; ..:·

Exemption is requested within 14 CFR Part 120, Drug 

### &Alcohol Testing.**.~** 

## 1: 5b

Specifically, identical butseparate entries in the table in Section 120.117 specify that an FAA approve.d drug testing program must be implemented for Part 135 and Part 91.147 operations. Ourfamily companywhich only has 24 employees including myself, mywife and my daughter have implemented an approvedprogram for our Part 91.147 operations and the FAA provided us with an Antidrug and Alcohol Misuse Prevention Program Operations Specifications (Opspec) as part ofthe process to approve our Part 135 operations. Our Part 135 operationswas active 15 years before the Drug and Alcohol Testing Program was initiated. We initially hadourownprogram in 1993(8-GL-00113-S) and thenjoined a consortium in 1999 (NADE) and were issued program number (E-EA-00010-U). One person handles all our91 and 135 operations (myself). Therefore forthe following_reasons we request thatwe have our program underone operation. 1. Relief: The relief we seek is acceptance of ourexisting program for both above operations, in orderto avoid redundant effort and expense.

1581 S. Washingto1, Holland, Ml 49423 1.800.748.0515 or 616.392.7831 • Fax: 616.392.1841 • e-mail: charter@tulipcityair.com • www.tulipcityair.com

### 2. Public Interest: 

### Reducing our cost helps us maintain the lowest possible rates for ourservices, as well as minimizes the effortthat the FAA must expend managing our drug and alcohol program. Both are in the Public Interest. 3. Safety: 

### The existing program approved for 135 passengerflights is both adequate and appropriatefor our Part 91 .147 operations. 4. Federal Register Summary: 

### Request to allowexisting FAA approved Drug Testing Program to be used for both Part 135 and Part 91.147 operations for a small family owned companywith only 24 employees and only 14 in a safety sensitive position for both 135 and 91 operations. 5. Summary: 

### Our company has been in operation for over40 years with no accidents and only one drug/alcohol issue over6years ago. Thank you foryourconsideration is this important matter. Sincerely,
Ronald Ludema President Drug and Alcohol program manager Phone: 616-392-781 Fax: 6 1 6-392-8280 Email: rludema@tulipcityair.com

2
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 745 

To reauthorize the State Criminal Alien Assistance Program, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 28, 2017 

Mr. FLAKE (for himself and Mr. MCCAIN) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To reauthorize the State Criminal Alien Assistance Program, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. STATE CRIMINAL ALIEN ASSISTANCE PRO4 GRAM. 

5 (a) SCAAP REAUTHORIZATION.—Section 241(i)(5) 

6 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 

7 1231(i)(5)) is amended— 

8 (1) by striking the em dash and all that follows 

9 through ‘‘(C)’’; and 

10 (2) by striking ‘‘2011’’ and inserting ‘‘2021’’. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 745 IS

1 (b) SCAAP ASSISTANCE FOR STATES.— 

2 (1) ASSISTANCE FOR STATES INCARCERATING

3 UNDOCUMENTED ALIENS CHARGED WITH CERTAIN

4 CRIMES.—Section 241(i)(3)(A) of such Act (8 

5 U.S.C. 1231(i)(3)(A)) is amended by inserting 

6 ‘‘charged with or’’ before ‘‘convicted’’. 

7 (2) ASSISTANCE FOR STATES INCARCERATING

8 UNVERIFIED ALIENS.—Section 241(i) of such Act (8 

9 U.S.C. 1231(i)), as amended by paragraph (1) and 

10 subsection (a), is further amended— 

11 (A) in paragraph (1), by inserting ‘‘and 

12 medical expenses’’ after ‘‘incarceration’’; 

13 (B) by redesignating paragraphs (4), (5), 

14 and (6), as paragraphs (5), (6), and (7), re15 spectively; 

16 (C) in paragraph (7), as redesignated, by 

17 striking ‘‘(5)’’ and inserting ‘‘(6)’’; and 

18 (D) by inserting after paragraph (3) the 

19 following: 

20 ‘‘(4) In the case of an alien whose immigration 

21 status is unable to be verified by the Secretary of 

22 Homeland Security, and who would otherwise be an 

23 undocumented criminal alien if the alien is unlaw24 fully present in the United States, the Attorney Gen25 eral shall compensate the State or political subdiviVerDate Sep 11 2014 01:14 Mar 30, 2017 Jkt 069200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S745.IS S745

SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 745 IS

1 sion of the State for the incarceration and medical 

2 expenses of the alien in accordance with paragraph 

3 (2).’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS 

No. 17-630V 

 Filed: November 14, 2017 

UNPUBLISHED 

ELIZABETH HIEBERT, 

 Petitioner, 

v. 

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES, 

 Respondent. 

Special Processing Unit (SPU); 

Ruling on Entitlement; Concession; 

Table Injury; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine; 

Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine 

Administration (SIRVA) 

   

John Robert Howie, Howie Law, PC, Dallas, TX, for petitioner. 

Lara Ann Englund, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent. 

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1

Dorsey, Chief Special Master: 

 On May 12, 2017, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the National 

Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,

2 (the “Vaccine 

Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine 

administration (“SIRVA”) as a result of an influenza (“flu”) vaccination administered on 

October 8, 2014. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit 

of the Office of Special Masters. 

On November 13, 2017, respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he 

concedes that petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 

4(c) Report at 1. Specifically, respondent concluded that petitioner suffered a SIRVA. 

                                                            

1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the 

undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with 

the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of 

Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to 

identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an 

unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits 

within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access. 

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for 

ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 

300aa (2012). 
Id. at 4. Respondent further agrees that petitioner has satisfied all legal prerequisites 

for compensation under the Vaccine Act. Id.

 In view of respondent’s position and the evidence of record, the 

undersigned finds that petitioner is entitled to compensation. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 s/Nora Beth Dorsey 

 Nora Beth Dorsey 

 Chief Special Master
Exhibit 32.1



Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350

(Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)



The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company



In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period
ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Matthew K. Rose, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Thomas N. Hund, Executive
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies that, to his knowledge on the date hereof:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: April 26, 2004



|                                                                |  |                                                                    
|--------------------------------------------------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Matthew K. Rose                                             |  | /s/ Thomas N. Hund                                                 
|Matthew K. Rose Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer |  | Thomas N. Hund Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company and will be retained by The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
### §7215. Applicability of payment limitations

Sections 1308 through 1308–3 of this title shall be applicable to contract payments made under this subchapter.

(Pub. L. 104–127, title I, §115(a), Apr. 4, 1996, 110 Stat. 902.)
#### 1315.603 General.

DOC will accept for review and consideration unsolicited proposals from any entity. DOC will not pay any costs associated with the preparation of unsolicited proposals. Proposals which do not meet the definition and applicable content and marking requirements of FAR 15.6 will not be considered under any circumstances and will be returned to the submitter. Unsolicited proposals may not be submitted electronically.
### INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT P-10-0524 C P-10-0524, P-10-0525 Focus Ready Draft 9/13/2010 ENGINEER: Prothero \ EV PV (kg/yr): Revision Notes/Assessment Overview: SUBMITTER: The Dow Chemical Company (submitter) USE:

OTHER USES: MSDS: Yes LABEL : N o Gen Eqpt: Use only with adequate general or local exhaust ventilation. Use chemical goggles. Use chemical resistant gloves (butyl rubber, polyethylene, chlorinated polyethylene, EVAL, PVC, or nitrile rubber recommended). Use face shield, boots, apron, or full body suit, depending on the task. Respirator: Use an approved air-purifying respirator equipped with an organic vapor sorbent and a particle filter. For situations where levels may exceed the effectiveness of an air -purifying respirator, use a positive-pressure air-supplying respirator (air line or self-contained breathing apparatus). Health Effects: May cause moderate eye irritation and slight temporary corneal injury. Prolonged contact may cause slight skin irritation with local redness. Excessive inhalation exposure may cause irritation to upper respiratory tract and lungs. May cause pulmonary edema. TLV/PEL : -

CRSS: (9/2/2010): Chemical Name: S-H2O: g/L @ VP: 1.0E-6 torr @ MW: Physical State and Misc CRSS Info: Neat: Solid (est.) Mfg: Proc/Form:

Consumer Use SAT (concerns): (9/3/2010): Related Cases and Misc SAT Info :Migration to groundwater: N egligible PBT rating: P 3 B 1 T 1 ; PMN: P1B1T1; Hyd Pdt: P3B1 T1 (P10-0524 and P10-0525) Health: 1-2, Dermal, Inhalation Eco: 1, N o releases to Water OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 2B NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS: Generated by the 06/07/2005 version of ChemSTEER.

POLLUTION PREVENTION CONSIDERATIONS:

P2 REC: EXPOSURE -BASED REVIEW:P-10-0524 C P-10-0524, P-10-0525 Manufacturing Number of Sites/Location: Basis: Process Description:


## ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY N o releases were assessed due to the following:



## RELEASE TOTAL

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES ESTIMATE SUMMARY Tot. # of workers exposed via assessed routes: Basis:

Dermal: Exposure to High End: Number of workers (all sites) with Dermal exposure: Basis:P-10-0524 C P-10-0524, P-10-0525 Use: Number of Sites/Location: Basis: Process Description:


## ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

RELEASE TOTAL

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES ESTIMATE SUMMARY Tot. # of workers exposed via assessed routes: Basis:

Dermal: Exposure to High End: Number of workers (all sites) with Dermal exposure: Basis:

Inhalation: Exposure to Upper Bound: Number of workers (all sites) with Inhalation exposure: Basis:



## INHALATION MONITORING DATA REVIEW 1) Uncertainty (estimate based on model, regulatory limit, or data not specific to industry): 2) (a) Exposure level > 1 mg/day? (b) Hazard Rating for health of 2 or greater? Inhalation Monitoring Data Desired ?
November 2012

The October 2008 Title I regulations require each state to establish a single graduation rate goal and annual targets that reflect continuous and substantial improvement from the prior year toward meeting or exceeding the goal (34 C.F.R. § 200.19(b)(3)(i)(A)-(B)).  This table sets forth the currently approved (*i.e.*, as of November 2012) goal and targets for each of the 50 states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico.  For some states, the goal and targets presented here were approved by the U.S. Department of Education following a peer review that was conducted in January 2010, and reflect the goal and targets in the state’s currently approved Accountability Workbook.  For other states, the goal and targets presented here reflect more recent changes that were made through the state’s approved ESEA flexibility request.  As of November 2012, all states and territories had transitioned to the regulatory four-year adjusted cohort graduation rate except for Idaho, Kentucky, Oklahoma, and Puerto Rico.

**Approved Graduation Rate Goal and Targets as of November 2012**

� Approval of New Jersey’s targets is still pending.  The current, approved targets are from New Jersey’s state accountability workbook:  “Until the state produces the adjusted cohort graduation rate in 2012 for determining AYP, at the high school level the transitional secondary measure will continue to be the dropout rate.  A dropout rate less than 2.6% or...0.5% less than the previous year is the standard.”

� Based on the approval of Washington’s ESEA flexibility request, new targets will be established for 2012 and beyond.  The State intends to use the same methodology for setting 5-year adjusted cohort graduation rate targets for schools and subgroups that it used for setting proficiency targets, namely reducing the gap between the 2011 baseline and 100% by half no later than 2017 for all students and each student subgroup.

4
----

**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONS      OF**

**CHIEF      EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | By:              | /s/ ARTHUR                D. LEVINSON                                                                     |   |
|--------|------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Name:Title:Date: | Arthur                D. Levinson, Ph.D.Chief                Executive OfficerFebruary                23, 2007 |   |

|   | By:                    | /s/ DAVID                A. EBERSMAN                                                                                                                            |   |
|--------|------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Name:Title: Date: | David                A. EbersmanExecutive                Vice President and    Chief                Financial OfficerFebruary                23, 2007 |   |

----