T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T ALEJ AN DRO M ARTI NEZ M ARTI NEZ; e t a l., P et i t i o n ers, v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 09- 70031 A ge nc yN os . A 029- 285- 845

A 099- 067- 894 A 099- 067- 895 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o a r do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d F e brua ry15, 2011 ** B e f o r e : C A N B Y , F E RN A N D E Z , a n dM . S M I T H , C ir c u it Ju d g e s . A l ej an d ro M art i n ez M art i n ez, a n at i v e an dci t i zen o f M ex i co , an dh i s fam i l y, na t i ve s a nd c i t i z e ns of

H ondur a s , pe t i t i on f

orr e vi e w of

the B oa r d of

I m m i gr a t i on A pp ea l s’ (“ B IA ”) order di sm i ss i ng thei r app ea l fr om an i m m i grat i on j ud ge’ s ( “ IJ ”) d e c is io n d e n y in g th e irap p lic a tio n s f o rc a n c e lla tio n o f

r e m o v a l. O u rju r is d ic tio n is



# FI LED FEB 28 2 011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS09- 70031 2 g o v e rn e db y8 U .S .C . § 1 2 5 2 . W e r e v ie w d e n o v o c o n s titu tio n a l c h a lle n g e s to r e m o v a l o r d e r s , L op ez -R odri gu ezv. Mukasey , 53 6 F . 3d 10 12 , 10 15 (9th C i r. 20 08 ), a n dw e d e n yin p art a n dd is m is s in p a rt th e p e titio n f o rr e v ie w . P e t i t i one r s ’ due pr oc e s s a r gum e ntr e ga r di ng a n a l l e ge d gap i n the tr a ns c r i pt f a ils b e c au s e th e yh a v e n o t d e m o n s tr a te dp r e ju d ic e . Se e Co lm e n a rv . I NS , 210 F .3 d9 6 7 , 9 7 1 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 0 ) ( p r e ju d ic e is r e q u ir e df

o radu e p r o c e s s v io la tio n ) . P e t i t i one r s ’ a r gum e nttha tthe I Jvi ol a t e d due pr oc e s s byf a i l i ng t o c onduc ta“ de novo” e vi de nt i a ryhe a r i ng i s a l s o unpe r s ua s i ve be c aus e pe t i t i one r s ha ve not dem on stra t ed thatthey w er e e nt i t l ed t o such a heari ng or thatany a dd i t i on al e v id e n c e w o u ldh a v e a f f e c te dth e o u tc o m e o f

th e p r o c e e d in g s . See i d. W e l a c k j ur i s di c t i on t o r e vi e w the a ge nc y ’ s di s c r e t i ona ryw e i ghi ng of the e v id e n c e in s up p o rt o f

th e p e titio n e r s ’ c a n c e lla tio n o f r e m o v a l ap p lic a tio n . See Sa n c h ez - Cr u zv . I

NS , 255 F . 3d 775, 779 ( 9th C i r . 2001) ( hol di ng tha tthe

“ m i sapp l i ca t i on of ca se l aw ” m ayno tbe re vi ew ed). P et i t i o n ers’ cl ai m o f ag en cy b i as i s n o tsup p o rt edb y th e reco rd . P et i t i o n ers’ c ont e nt i on tha tthe I Jm a de a n a d hoc a dve r s e c r e di bi l i tyde t e rm i na t i on i s not s up p o rte db yth e r e c o r d . P E T IT IO N F O R R E V IE W D E N IE D i n p art; D IS M IS S E D i n p art.