alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 9 (Thursday, January 14, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3162-3163]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-00651]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Nursing Research; Notice of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Nursing Research 
Special Emphasis Panel; Modular Budget Research Project Grant for 
NIH Nurse Scientist Scholars.
    Date: February 5, 2021.
    Time: 10:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institute of Nursing Research, National 
Institutes of Health, 6701 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892 
(Virtual Meeting).

[[Page 3163]]

    Contact Person: Ming Yan, MD, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, 
Immunology (IMM), DPPS, Center for Scientific Review, National 
Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, RM 4205, Bethesda, MD 
20892, (301) 594-0343, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#4f362e21222621280f222e26236121262761282039"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="5a233b343733343d1a373b333674343332743d352c">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Nursing Research 
Special Emphasis Panel; Fellowship and Career Development.
    Date: February 19, 2021.
    Time: 10:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institute of Nursing Research, National 
Institutes of Health, 6701 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892 
(Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Ming Yan, MD, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, 
Immunology (IMM), DPPS, Center for Scientific Review, National 
Institute of Nursing Research, National Institutes of Health, 6701 
Rockledge Drive, RM 4205 Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 594-0343, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f98098979490979eb994989095d7979091d79e968f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a5dcc4cbc8cccbc2e5c8c4ccc98bcbcccd8bc2cad3">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.361, 
Nursing Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 8, 2021.
Tyeshia Roberson,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2021-00651 Filed 1-13-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
1845.501-70 General. ( b ) When the Industrial Property Officer or Property Administrator determines that the contractor's proposed systems, standards and practices for the management of Government property are inadequate to manage Government property, the Contracting Officer should: (1) Require the contractor to provide a written revision that addresses the determination of the Industrial Property Officer or Property Administrator.
#### 1846.370 NASA contract clauses.

The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 1852.246-73, Human Space Flight Item, in solicitations and contracts for human space flight hardware and flight-related equipment if the highest available quality standards are necessary to ensure astronaut safety.

[80 FR 60554, Oct. 7, 2015]
#### 18.108 Qualifications requirements.

Agencies may determine not to enforce qualification requirements when an emergency exists. (See 9.206-1.)

[71 FR 38248, July 5, 2006. Redesignated at 72 FR 46344, Aug. 17, 2007]
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

JONATHAN PHILLIPS, et al., )

)

Plaintiffs, )

)

v. ) No. 12 C 1791

)

DePAUL UNIVERSITY, etc., et al.,)

)

Defendants. )

MEMORANDUM ORDER

Plaintiffs have moved to remand this CAFA action to its

place of origin, the Circuit Court of Cook County, and defendant

DePaul University (“DePaul”) has filed its memorandum in

opposition. Today this Court has ruled orally that if DePaul’s

presentation were to be modified to take account of the fact that

its Law School’s figures as to the states of citizenship of its

current student body have been based on representations in the

students’ original applications for admission, while the yearafter-year experience of DePaul’s graduating classes is that a

much higher percentage have chosen Illinois citizenship instead,

it is a near certainly that well over two-thirds of the members

of the proposed plaintiff classes in the aggregate are Illinois

citizens. On that premise this Court would be compelled by 28

U.S.C. §1332(d)(4) to decline to exercise jurisdiction under 28

U.S.C. §1332(d)(2).

In that respect, even under DePaul’s own skewed mixture of

(1) the actual current citizenship of its alumni from the Law

Case: 1:12-cv-01791 Document #: 19 Filed: 04/24/12 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:488
School classes of 2007 through 2011 and (2) the non-current (and

doubtless inaccurate) citizenship information as to the three inschool classes of 2012 through 2014, 1,604 putative class members

out of a putative total of 2,440 have Illinois citizenship. That

works out to 65.7%, or less than 1% below the two-thirds figure. 

That means that just 23 students of the Law School’s present

student body would have to have shifted to Illinois citizenship

to compel this Court to decline CAFA jurisdiction.

But it is unnecessary to tweak the figures in that manner. 

More importantly, even if DePaul’s skewed approach were to be

adopted, this Court’s oral ruling has explained in detail why the

interests of justice and the totality of the circumstances have

led this Court to decline under 28 U.S.C. §1332(d)(3) to exercise

such jurisdiction. Accordingly this Court grants plaintiffs’

motion to remand the action to the state court, and the Clerk of

this District Court is ordered to mail the certified copy of the

order of remand to the Clerk of the Circuit Court forthwith.

________________________________________

Milton I. Shadur

Senior United States District Judge

Date: April 24, 2012

2

Case: 1:12-cv-01791 Document #: 19 Filed: 04/24/12 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:489
#### 1845.610 Sale of surplus contractor inventory.
### §586. Refusal of certificates for violations of laws; penalties for violations

After opportunity for hearing the Secretary is authorized to refuse the issuance of certificates under this chapter for periods not exceeding ninety days to any person who ships or offers for shipment any apples in foreign commerce in violation of any of the provisions of this chapter. Any person or any common carrier or any transportation agency knowingly violating any of the provisions of this chapter shall be fined not less than $100 nor more than $10,000 by a court of competent jurisdiction.

(June 10, 1933, ch. 59, §6, 48 Stat. 124; Pub. L. 106–96, §1(c)(1), Nov. 12, 1999, 113 Stat. 1321.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1999—Pub. L. 106–96 struck out "and/or pears" after "any apples".
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>       5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED BALANCE SHEET AND CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENT OF
OPERATIONS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FIANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>    1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                    DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                          4789
<SECURITIES>                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                   4688
<ALLOWANCES>                    0
<INVENTORY>                     6691
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                18850
<PP&E>                          18391
<DEPRECIATION>                  14014
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  23227
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           3155
<BONDS>                         0
<COMMON>                        14057
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     0
<OTHER-SE>                      5913
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    23227
<SALES>                         33166
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                33166
<CGS>                           20582
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   29601
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                (134)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              16
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 3683
<INCOME-TAX>                    (1789)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             5472
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    5472
<EPS-PRIMARY>                   1.38
<EPS-DILUTED>                   1.38
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-1231

DANIEL JOHNSON WILLIS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

WILLIAM C. GRIFFIN, JR., Senior Resident

Judge; PHILIP W. TOELKES, Trial Court Administrator; CHARLES E. SIMPSON, JR., Attorney;

THE LAW FIRM OF HARRIS, SHIELDS AND CREECH;

DEBRA TURNER, Assistant Clerk of Superior

Court; C. C. HENDERSON, Town Attorney, Town of

Trenton, North Carolina; JOFFREE T. LEGGETT,

Mayor; EDWARD EUBANKS, Town Councilman; WILLARD O. LEWIS, Town Councilman; CHARLES JONES,

Town Councilman; C. GLENN SPIVEY, Town Clerk;

NORTH CAROLINA FARM BUREAU MUTUAL INSURANCE

COMPANY; DONALD STILLEY, President, North

Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance; ABBOTT

MEADOWS, Vice President, North Carolina Farm

Bureau Mutual Insurance; EDGAR MILLS, Secretary, North Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual

Insurance; MICHAEL SHEPERD, Treasurer, North

Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance; HARVEY

ROUSE, JR., Board of Directors; ALVA HOWARD,

Board of Directors; ROOSEVELT MURRELL, Board

of Directors; C. W. ADAMS, Board of Directors;

KEITH METTS, Board of Directors; SAM DAVIS,

Board of Directors; LEROY MEADOWS, Board of

Directors; LARRY JONES, Board of Directors;

their agents, employees and successors. All

defendants are sued in their individual and

official capacities; TOWN OF TRENTON, NORTH

CAROLINA,

Defendants - Appellees.
2

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at New Bern. Terrence W. Boyle, District

Judge. (CA-96-152-BO)

Submitted: June 19, 1997 Decided: June 27, 1997

Before WILKINS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Daniel Johnson Willis, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Giles Meacham, Jr.,

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North

Carolina; Robert Strong Shields, Jr., Charles E. Simpson, Jr.,

Thomas Edward Harris, HARRIS, SHIELDS & CREECH, New Bern, North

Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
3

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on

his civil rights action. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Willis v. Griffin,

No. CA-96-152-BO (E.D.N.C. Jan. 21, 1997). We deny Willis's motion

for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
#### LeChase Construction Services, LLC, Respondent-Appellant, v Hunt Construction Group, Inc., Appellant-Respondent.

[832 NYS2d 842]

Appeal and cross appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Oneida County (Anthony F. Shaheen, J.), entered April 25, 2006 in a breach of contract action. The order, among other things, denied defendant’s cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs for *1237reasons stated in decision at Supreme Court. Present—Gorski, J.P, Lunn, Fahey, Green and Pine, JJ.
#### 16.205-1 Description.

A fixed-price contract with prospective price redetermination provides for (a) a firm fixed price for an initial period of contract deliveries or performance and (b) prospective redetermination, at a stated time or times during performance, of the price for subsequent periods of performance.
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

CLIFTON MORGAN, )

)

Plaintiff, )

v. ) 11 C 9271

)

CITY OF CHICAGO, CHICAGO POLICE ) JUDGE NORGLE

OFFICERS DUANE DE VRIES, Star #250, )

CHRISTIAN TSOUKALAS, Star #1724, and )

ANTHONY SCHULTZ, Star #887, )

)

Defendants. )

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT THE RECORD ON APPEAL

Plaintiff, CLIFTON MORGAN, by and through one of his attorneys, Jeanette Samuels, 

hereby moves this Honorable Court, pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 10(e), to supplement the record 

on appeal now before the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. In support of 

this motion, the Plaintiff states as follows:

1. This matter is currently pending on appeal before the Seventh Circuit.

2. This case involves an appeal from the district court’s denial of Plaintiffs’ motion

for a new trial. The transcript from voir dire and the trial were referenced by both 

parties during motions practice. Exhibit 1, Complete Voir Dire and Trial 

Transcript.

3. The record on appeal was filed on November 6, 2014. The transcript from voir 

dire and the trial are not in the record on appeal. 

4. Because these transcripts were relied on when ruling on the motion that is the 

subject of this appeal, they should be included in the record on appeal. Plaintiff 

Case: 1:11-cv-09271 Document #: 115 Filed: 01/14/15 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:1781
2

will deliver these transcripts to the clerk’s office immediately upon receipt of this 

Court’s ruling.

WHEREFORE the Plaintiff, CLIFTON MORGAN, respectfully requests that this 

Honorable Court enter an order that the record on appeal be supplemented with the voir dire and 

trial transcript, and that the Clerk of the United States District Court for the Northern District of 

Illinois, Eastern Division, prepare the documents in the form required for transmission to the 

Seventh Circuit.

Respectfully Submitted,

CLIFTON MORGAN

 By: s/Jeanette Samuels

 One of Plaintiff’s Attorneys

JARED S. KOSOGLAD, P.C.

118 S. Clinton, Suite 200

Chicago, Illinois 60661

312.515.1444

jeanette@jaredlaw.com

Case: 1:11-cv-09271 Document #: 115 Filed: 01/14/15 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:1782
3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned attorney hereby certify that on January 14, 2015, a copy of this 

Certificate of Service along with the attached pleading was served on counsel of record via the 

Court’s electronic filing system. 

s/Jeanette Samuels

 

Case: 1:11-cv-09271 Document #: 115 Filed: 01/14/15 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:1783
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Kim Fuesrt, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Form 10-KSB of Colorado Wyoming Reserve Company.

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.



Date:  September 26, 2005

/s/ Kim Fuerst



Kim Fuerst



Chief Executive Officer
#### 1852.245-81 List of available Government property.

As prescribed in 1845.107-70(l), insert the following provision.

# List of Available Government Property (JAN 2011)

(a) The Government will make the following Government property available for use in performance of the contract resulting from this solicitation, on a no-charge-for-use basis in accordance with FAR 52.245-1, Government Property, included in this solicitation. The offeror shall notify the Government, as part of its proposal, of its intention to use or not use the property.

(b) The Government will make the following Government property available for use in performance of the contract resulting from this solicitation, on a no-charge-for-use basis in accordance with FAR 52.245-2, Government Property Installation Operation Services, as included in this solicitation. The offeror shall notify the Government of its intention to use or not use the property.

(c) The selected Contractor will be responsible for costs associated with transportation, and installation of the property listed in this provision.

(End of provision)

[76 FR 2006, Jan. 12, 2011]
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA F OURTH D ISTRICT

EUGENE JACOBS, JR. , Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA , Appellee

.

No. 4D 18

- 1134

[ July 26, 2018 ]

Appeal from order denying rule 3.850 motion to the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County ; Dan L. Vaughn , Judge; L.T. Case No. 56

- 2010

- CF

- 003192

- A

.
Eugene Jacobs, Wewahitchka, pro se.

No brief filed for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.
Affirmed

.

G ROSS , M AY and L EVINE , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
1 

### United States Environmental Protection Agency

Administrative Index for NPRM action EPA-R09 - OAR- 2010 - 1078 Revision to the South Coast Portion of the California Implementation Plan ,

C PV Sentinel Energy Project AB 1318 Tracking System 

### Docket Index Category/ Item Number I. SIP Submittal Documents

 SIP submittal letter from CARB dated September 10 , 2010 I - A  Revision to the SIP Preamble I - B  CPV Sentinel Energy Project AB 1318 Tracking System I - C  Air Quality

Demonstration: SIP Revision for CPV Sentinel Energy Project I - D II. Federal Register Notice s  61 FR 6 4 291 II - A III. Other Relevant Documents

 Submittal Completeness Letter dated October 27, 2010 III - A  Technical Support Document for NPRM EPA - R09 - OAR - 2010 - 1078 III - B IV. EPA Rulemaking Documents

 Federal Register Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, Pre - publication Version IV - A Notes: 1. All documents are available on internet at Regulations.gov under Docket # EPA - R09 - OAR - 2010 - 1078 . 2. Copies of the listed documents a re located at EPA Region 9 offices.
#### 1652.232-71 Payments—experience-rated contracts.

As prescribed in 1632.172, the following clause shall be inserted in all experience-rated FEHBP contracts:

# Payments (JAN 2000)

(a) OPM will pay to the Carrier, in full settlement of its obligations under this contract, subject to adjustment for error or fraud, the subscription charges received for the Plan by the Employees Health Benefits Fund (hereinafter called the Fund) less the amounts set aside by OPM for the Contingency Reserve and for the administrative expenses of OPM and amounts for obligations due pursuant to paragraph (b) of this clause, plus any payments made by OPM from the Contingency Reserve.

(b) OPM will notify the Carrier of amounts due for outstanding obligations under the contract. Not later than 60 days after the date of written notice from OPM, the Carrier shall reimburse OPM. If payment is not received within the prescribed time frame, OPM shall withhold the amount due from the subscription charges owed the Carrier under paragraph (a) of this clause.

(c) The specific subscription rates, charges, allowances and limitations applicable to the contract are set forth in Appendix B.

(d) Recurring payments from premiums shall be made available for carrier drawdown not later than thirty days after receipt by the Fund. The Contracting Officer may authorize special non-recurring payments from the Contingency Reserve in accordance with OPM's regulations.

(e) In the event this contract between the Carrier and OPM is terminated or not renewed in accordance with General Provision 1.15, RENEWAL and WITHDRAWAL OF APPROVAL, the Contingency Reserve of the Carrier held by OPM shall be available to the Carrier to pay the necessary and proper charges against this contract to the extent that the Carrier reserves are insufficient for that purpose.

(End of clause)

[53 FR 51784, Dec. 23, 1988, as amended at 57 FR 14361, Apr. 20, 1992; 62 FR 47578, Sept. 10, 1997; 63 FR 55339, Oct. 15, 1998; 64 FR 36274, July 6, 1999; 65 FR 36388, June 8, 2000; 80 FR 37180, June 30, 2015]
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETER ANS CLAIM S

N O

. 22

- 4543

J OHN F. J OE

, A PPELLANT

,

V

.

D ENIS M C D ONOUGH

, S ECRETARY OF V ETERANS A FFAIRS

, A PPELLEE

.

Before PIETSCH

, GREENBERG , and JAQUITH

, Judges

.

O R D E R

On March 14 , 2023, the Court stayed this case and canceled oral argument , previously

scheduled for March 23, 2023. On March 21, 2023, Mr. Joe filed a motion to dismiss the case.

Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is

ORDERED that the stay in this matter is lifted. It is furthe r

ORDERED that Mr. Joe's motion to dismiss the case is granted . It is further

ORDERED that this appeal is DISMISSED.

DATED: June 14, 2023 PER CURIAM.

Copies to:

Harold H. Hoffman III

VA General Counsel (027)
#### 1501.603-1 General.

EPA Contracting Officers shall be selected and appointed and their appointments terminated in accordance with the Contracting Officer warrant program specified in EPA Acquisition Guide (EPAAG) subsection 1.6.4.

[82 FR 33018, July 19, 2017]