alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1
 
                         SUBSIDIARIES OF BANCTEC, INC.
 
1. BancTec USA, Inc., a Delaware corporation.
 
2. BancTec (Management), Inc., a Delaware corporation.
 
3. BancTec (Export), Inc., a Virgin Islands corporation.
 
4. BancTec (Puerto Rico), Inc., a Delaware corporation.
 
5. BancTec (Canada), Inc., a Canadian corporation.
 
6. BancTec Limited, a U.K. corporation.
 
7. BancTec (Australia) Pty Limited, an Australian corporation.
 
8. BancTec Japan, Inc., a Delaware corporation.
 
9. BancTec Holding N.V., a Netherlands corporation
 
  BancTec GmbH, a German corporation.
 
  BancTec S.A., a French corporation.
 
  BancTec B.V., a Dutch corporation.
 
  BancTec AB, a Swedish corporation.
 
  BancTec Danmark A/S, a Danish corporation.
 
  BancTec Iberica S.A., a Spanish corporation.
 
                                       47
#### 1552.214-71 Contract award—other factors—formal advertising.

As prescribed in 1514.201-6(b), insert the following solicitation provision in invitations for bids (IFB) when it is appropriate to describe other factors that will be used in evaluating bids for award. This provision is used to describe the other factors mentioned in the solicitation provisions “Contract Award—Formal Advertising” (FAR 52.214-10), and “Contract Award—Construction” (FAR 52.214-19). All other evaluation provisions in the IFB (e.g., evaluation of options) should be cross-referenced in this provision. The other factors set forth in the provision should represent a consolidated statement of the exact basis upon which bids will be evaluated for award.

# Contract Award—Other Factors—Formal Advertising (APR 1984)

The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation as stated in the “Contract Award” provision. The other factors that will be considered are:

(End of provision)
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ivan Gonzalez, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered July 15, 1977, convicting him of bribery in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Judgment reversed, on the law and the facts, indictment dismissed, and case remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for the purpose of entering an order in its discretion pursuant to CPL 160.50. Defendant’s guilt was not proven beyond a reasonable doubt. Martuscello, J. P., Titone, Shapiro and O’Connor, JJ., concur.
#### 1424.102 General.

Procedures for implementing the Privacy Act of 1974 and Departmental regulations under 43 CFR part 2, subpart D, are contained in 383 DM.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>      5
<MULTIPLIER>   1
       
<S>                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                        3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      APR-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                           JUL-31-1997
<CASH>                                     265,992
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                            1,419,778
<ALLOWANCES>                               360,709
<INVENTORY>                              1,457,939
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         4,601,918
<PP&E>                                   1,845,737
<DEPRECIATION>                             981,239
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          11,221,002
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    4,266,942
<BONDS>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    96,518
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                100,000
<OTHER-SE>                               6,757,542
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            11,221,002
<SALES>                                  2,952,910
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         2,952,910
<CGS>                                    1,991,567
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            2,729,438
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           439,319
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          74,503
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            588,288
<INCOME-TAX>                               247,081
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        341,207
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                               341,207
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .04
        

</TABLE>
18.202 Defense or recovery from certain events. ( a ) *Micro-purchase threshold.* The threshold increases when the head of the agency determines the supplies or services are to be used to facilitate defense against or recovery from cyber, nuclear, biological, chemical, or radiological attack; to facilitate provision of international disaster assistance; or to support response to an emergency or major disaster. (See 2.101.)
( b ) *Simplified acquisition threshold.* The threshold increases when the head of the agency determines the supplies or services are to be used to facilitate defense against or recovery from cyber, nuclear, biological, chemical, or radiological attack; to facilitate provision of international disaster assistance; or to support response to an emergency or major disaster. (See 2.101.)
( c ) *Commercial product or commercial service treatment.* Contracting officers may treat any acquisition of supplies or services as an acquisition of commercial products or commercial services if the head of the agency determines the acquisition is to be used to facilitate the defense against or recovery from cyber, nuclear, biological, chemical, or radiological attack. (See 12.102(f)(1) and 13.500(c)(2).)
( d ) *Simplified procedures for certain commercial products and commercial services.* The threshold limits authorized for use of this authority may be increased when it is determined the acquisition is to facilitate defense against or recovery from cyber, nuclear, biological, chemical, or radiological attack; to facilitate provision of international disaster assistance; or to support response to an emergency or major disaster. (See 13.500(c).)
( e ) *Sustainable products and services.* Contracting officers are encouraged, but not required, to procure sustainable products and services if the head of the agency determines the supplies or services are to be used to facilitate defense against or recovery from cyber, nuclear, biological, chemical, or radiological attack; to facilitate provision of international disaster assistance; or to support response to an emergency or major disaster (see 23.106(c)).
[84 FR 19837, May 6, 2019, as amended at 86 FR 61027, Nov. 4, 2021; 89 FR 30238, Apr. 22, 2024]
Parameter VAPOR 35 VAPOR 55 Geometry & Weights Main Rotor Diameter 65 in 90 in
Dimensions 51 x 25 x 19.4 in 77 x 26 x 23 Maximum Takeoff Weight 30 lbs 55 lbs Empty Weight 16 lbs 19 lbs Payload Weight 5 lbs (16 lbs useful load) 10 lbs (33 lbs useful load)
Data Link 2.4 GHz & 900 MHz, High Bandwidth, Encrypted, Digital
Performance Endurance (Hover) 45 Minutes Endurance (Cruise) 60 Minutes Operational Radius 5 Miles 1 Cruise Speed 25 mph Ceiling 15,000 ft2 Take Off Type Automatic Vertical Take Off Landing Type Automatic Vertical Landing Mapping Area See Chart
Features Drive Electric powerplant with 2 stage tramsmission, torque tube tail drive, lithium battery
Avionics Fully automatic flight control system 3 or 5 axis redundant IMU options Honeywell Digital Magnetometer Survey Grade GPS + Glonass positioning Algorithms Robust multivariable helicopter control system Extended Kalman flter navigation Globally asymptotic nonlinear guidance Waypoint guidance and joystick control Automatic Autorotation Smart automatic homing Rotor speed governing and collective limiting

Automatic magnetic declination setting Automatic rotor speed setting with altitude Aerodynamics 3 blade semi-rigid flybarless main rotor, high effciency carbon fber blades Payload Compatibility HD EO/MWIR brushless camera ball Riegl VUX-1 LiDAR with survey grade GNSS/IMU

High resolution aerial photography imagers 1) Larger radius possible with custom data link 2) Altitudes above 10,000 ft AMSL require custom modifcation 

# Specifcations

493.4 mm [19.4 in] 1941 mm [76.4 in] 334 mm [13 in]

625 mm [24 .6 in] 1704 mm [67 in]



# 35



# 55

© 2014 Pulse Aerospace, Inc. Proprietary. Not for Redistribution without written consent. © 2014 Pulse Aerospace, Inc. Proprietary. Not for Redistribution without written consent.

# Pulse Aerospace, Inc. 450 N Iowa St. Ste A1

Lawrence, KS 66044

Sales Contact: Phone: 785-289-8402 Email: sales@pulseaero.com ®



# www.pulseaero.com

© 2014 Pulse Aerospace, Inc. Proprietary. Not for Redistribution without written consent.
#### 1502.100 Definitions.

*Chief of the Contracting Office (CCO)* means the Office of Acquisition Management Division Directors at Headquarters, Research Triangle Park and Cincinnati. For purposes of ratification authority only, CCO also includes Regional Acquisition Managers. (See 1501.602-3(b)(3) for the criteria for this ratification authority).

*Commercial supplier agreements (CSAs)* mean terms and conditions customarily offered to the public by vendors of supplies or services that meet the definition of “commercial item” set forth in FAR 2.101 and intended to create a binding legal obligation on the end user. CSAs are common in information technology acquisitions, including acquisitions of commercial computer software and commercial technical data, and they may apply to any supply or service. CSAs may apply regardless of the format or style of the document (for example, a CSA may be styled as *standard terms of sale or lease, Terms of Service* (TOS), *End User License Agreement* (EULA), or another similar legal instrument or agreement, and may be presented as part of a proposal or quotation responding to a solicitation for a contract or order). CSAs may also apply regardless of the media or delivery mechanism used (for example, a CSA may be presented as one or more paper documents, or may appear on a computer or other electronic device screen during a purchase, software installation, product delivery, registration for a service, or other transaction).

*Head of the Contracting Activity (HCA)* means the Director, Office of Acquisition Management.

*Senior Procurement Executive (SPE)* means the Director, Office of Acquisition Management.

[67 FR 5072, Feb. 4, 2002, as amended at 80 FR 75951, Dec. 7, 2015; 86 FR 55712, Oct. 7, 2021]
### §6524. Organically produced food

In the case of a food certified under the national organic program established under the Organic Foods Production Act of 1990 (7 U.S.C. 6501 et seq.), the certification shall be considered sufficient to make a claim regarding the absence of bioengineering in the food, such as "not bioengineered", "non-GMO", or another similar claim.

(Pub. L. 114–216, §2, July 29, 2016, 130 Stat. 838.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Organic Foods Production Act of 1990, referred to in text, is title XXI of Pub. L. 101–624, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 3935, which is classified generally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 6501 of this title and Tables.

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of Pub. L. 114–216, and not as part of the Organic Foods Production Act of 1990 which comprises this chapter.
14.406 Receipt of an unreadable electronic bid. If a bid received at the Government facility by electronic data interchange is unreadable to the degree that conformance to the essential requirements of the invitation for bids cannot be ascertained, the contracting officer immediately shall notify the bidder that the bid will be rejected unless the bidder provides clear and convincing evidence— ( a ) Of the content of the bid as originally submitted; and
( b ) That the unreadable condition of the bid was caused by Government software or hardware error, malfunction, or other Government mishandling.
[60 FR 34738, July 3, 1995]
#### In the Matter of Union Hill Cash & Carry Lumber Co., Inc., Respondent, v. Peter P. Lesco, Doing Business as P-L Construction Co., Appellant.

Order unanimously reversed, without costs of this appeal to either party, and motion denied, without costs, without prejudice to the right to renew upon a proper showing that bankruptcy court has granted petitioner leave to pursue its remedy under the Lien Law in a State court. Memorandum: Under the circumstances of this ease no proceedings should have been taken in the State court without permission of the bankruptcy court. *(Thompson*v. *Magnolia*Co., 309 U. S. 478, 483; 1 Collier, Bankruptcy [14th ed.], § 2.07.) (Appeal from an order of Monroe Special Term granting petitioner’s motion directing respondent to furnish a verified statement pursuant to section 76 of the Lien Law.) Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Goldman, Henry and Noonan, JJ.
17.502-1 General. ( a ) *Written agreement on responsibility for management and administration* — ( 1 ) *Assisted acquisitions.* ( i ) Prior to the issuance of a solicitation, the servicing agency and the requesting agency shall both sign a written interagency agreement that establishes the general terms and conditions governing the relationship between the parties, including roles and responsibilities for acquisition planning, contract execution, and administration and management of the contract(s) or order(s). The requesting agency shall provide to the servicing agency any unique terms, conditions, and applicable agency-specific statutes, regulations, directives, and other applicable requirements for incorporation into the order or contract. In the event there are no agency unique requirements beyond the FAR, the requesting agency shall so inform the servicing agency contracting officer in writing. For acquisitions on behalf of the Department of Defense, also see subpart 17.7. For patent rights, see 27.304-2. In preparing interagency agreements to support assisted acquisitions, agencies should review the Office of Federal Procurement Policy (OFPP) guidance, Interagency Acquisitions, available at *https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/legacy_drupal_files/omb/assets/OMB/procurement/interagency_acq/iac_revised.pdf*.
( ii ) Each agency's file shall include the interagency agreement between the requesting and servicing agency, and shall include sufficient documentation to ensure an adequate audit consistent with 4.801(b).
( 2 ) *Direct acquisitions.* The requesting agency administers the order; therefore, no written agreement with the servicing agency is required.
( b ) *Business-case analysis requirements for multi-agency contracts and governmentwide acquisition contracts.* In order to establish a multi-agency or governmentwide acquisition contract, a business-case analysis must be prepared by the servicing agency and approved in accordance with the OFPP business case guidance, available at *https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/legacy_drupal_files/omb/procurement/memo/development-review-and-approval-of-business-cases-for-certain-interagency-and-agency-specific-acquisitions-memo.pdf* The[ACM(3] business-case analysis shall— ( 1 ) Consider strategies for the effective participation of small businesses during acquisition planning (see 7.103(u));
( 2 ) Detail the administration of such contract, including an analysis of all direct and indirect costs to the Government of awarding and administering such contract;
( 3 ) Describe the impact such contract will have on the ability of the Government to leverage its purchasing power, *e.g.,* will it have a negative effect because it dilutes other existing contracts;
( 4 ) Include an analysis concluding that there is a need for establishing the multi-agency contract; and
( 5 ) Document roles and responsibilities in the administration of the contract.
[75 FR 77735, Dec. 13, 2010, as amended at 77 FR 186, Jan. 3, 2012; 77 FR 69722, Nov. 20, 2012; 83 FR 42573, Aug. 22, 2018; 84 FR 19838, May 6, 2019; 86 FR 3687, Jan. 14, 2021; 87 FR 49502, Aug. 10, 2022]
MP

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0721

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

COLBY SCOTT DEVLIN,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 30-day extension of time, and

good cause appearing therefor, Appellee is granted an extension of time to and

including May 15, 2024, within which to prepare, serve, and file its response brief.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

April 5 2024

04/05/2024

Case Number: DA 22-0721
§ 2.5 Criteria for designation of participating programs. ( a ) Candidate programs must have an approved requirement, full program funding assured prior to designation, and low risk. Nomination of a candidate program to participate in the Defense Acquisition Pilot Program should occur as early in the program's life-cycle as possible. Developmental programs will only be considered on an exception basis.
( b ) Programs in which commercial or non-developmental items can satisfy the military requirement are preferred as candidate programs. A nominated program will address which standard commercial, industrial practices will be used in the pilot program and how those practices will be applied.
( c ) Nomination of candidate programs must be accompanied by a list of waivers being requested to Statutes, FAR, DFARS, DoD Directives[4] and Instructions,[5] and where applicable, DoD Component regulations. Waivers being requested must be accompanied by rationale and justification for the waiver. The justification must include: ( 1 ) The provision of law proposed to be waived or limited.
( 2 ) The effects of the provision of law on the acquisition, including specific examples.
( 3 ) The actions taken to ensure that the waiver or limitation will not reduce the efficiency, integrity, and effectiveness of the acquisition process used for the defense acquisition program; and
( 4 ) A discussion of the efficiencies or savings, if any, that will result from the waiver or limitation.
( d ) No nominated program shall be accepted until the Under Secretary of Defense has determined that the candidate program is properly planned.
Footnotes -
2.5
[4] See footnote 3 to § 2.4(b).
[5] See footnote 3 to § 2.4(b).
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 9 (Thursday, January 14, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3227-3228]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-00632]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 11311]


Designation of Sultan Yusuf Hasan al-`Arif as a Specially 
Designated Global Terrorist

    Acting under the authority of and in accordance with section 
1(a)(ii)(B) of Executive Order 13224 of September 23, 2001, as amended 
by Executive Order 13268 of July 2, 2002, Executive Order 13284 of 
January 23, 2003, and Executive Order 13886 of September 9, 2019, I 
hereby determine that the person known as Sultan Yusuf Hasan al-`Arif, 
also known as Qital al-`Abdali, also

[[Page 3228]]

known as Qattal al-`Abdali, also known as Qital al-Najdi, also known as 
Abu Musab al-Saudi, is a foreign person who is a leader of al-Qa'ida, a 
group whose property and interests in property are concurrently blocked 
pursuant to a determination by the Secretary of State pursuant to 
Executive Order 13224.
    Consistent with the determination in section 10 of Executive Order 
13224 that prior notice to persons determined to be subject to the 
Order who might have a constitutional presence in the United States 
would render ineffectual the blocking and other measures authorized in 
the Order because of the ability to transfer funds instantaneously, I 
determine that no prior notice needs to be provided to any person 
subject to this determination who might have a constitutional presence 
in the United States, because to do so would render ineffectual the 
measures authorized in the Order.
    This notice shall be published in the Federal Register.

    Dated: January 6, 2021.
Michael R. Pompeo,
Secretary of State.
[FR Doc. 2021-00632 Filed 1-13-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-AD-P
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Robert L. Bailey hereby certify, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in my capacity as an officer of PMC-Sierra, Inc. (PMC), that, to my knowledge, the Annual Report of PMC on Form 10-K/A for the annual period ended December 31, 2005, fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13 (a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of PMC.



|                      |  |     |  |                                      
|--------------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: August 16, 2006 |  | By: |  | /s/ Robert L. Bailey                 
|                      |  |     |  | Robert L. Bailey                     
|                      |  |     |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Annual program summary for theBLM Coos Bay District.**
 
1997 | 1998 | 1999 | 2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006| 2007
 
SuDoc Number:I 53.2:C 78/2/
Item Number:0631 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000897240
 
September 3, 2019
16.301-2 Application. ( a ) The contracting officer shall use cost-reimbursement contracts only when— ( 1 ) Circumstances do not allow the agency to define its requirements sufficiently to allow for a fixed-price type contract (*see* 7.105); or
( 2 ) Uncertainties involved in contract performance do not permit costs to be estimated with sufficient accuracy to use any type of fixed-price contract.
( b ) The contracting officer shall document the rationale for selecting the contract type in the written acquisition plan and ensure that the plan is approved and signed at least one level above the contracting officer (*see* 7.103(j) and 7.105). *See also* 16.103(d).
[76 FR 14547, Mar. 16, 2011, as amended at 77 FR 12927, Mar. 2, 2012]
14.408-3 Prompt payment discounts. ( a ) Prompt payment discounts shall not be considered in the evaluation of bids. However, any discount offered will form a part of the award, and will be taken by the payment center if payment is made within the discount period specified by the bidder. As an alternative to indicating a discount in conjunction with the offer, bidders may prefer to offer discounts on individual invoices.
( b ) See 32.111(b)(1), which prescribes the contract clause at 52.232-8, Discounts for Prompt Payment.
[48 FR 42171, Sept. 19, 1983, as amended at 50 FR 26903, June 28, 1985. Redesignated at 60 FR 34738, July 3, 1995; 70 FR 43581, July 27, 2005]