alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FINANCIAL SECTION

REPORT OF THE INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

92 FY 2016 Agency Financial Report—U.S. Department of Education
FINANCIAL SECTION

REPORT OF THE INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

FY 2016 Agency Financial Report—U.S. Department of Education 93
FINANCIAL SECTION

REPORT OF THE INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

94 FY 2016 Agency Financial Report—U.S. Department of Education 
FINANCIAL SECTION

REPORT OF THE INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

FY 2016 Agency Financial Report—U.S. Department of Education 95
FINANCIAL SECTION

REPORT OF THE INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

96 FY 2016 Agency Financial Report—U.S. Department of Education
FINANCIAL SECTION

REPORT OF THE INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

FY 2016 Agency Financial Report—U.S. Department of Education 97
FINANCIAL SECTION

REPORT OF THE INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

98 FY 2016 Agency Financial Report—U.S. Department of Education
FINANCIAL SECTION

REPORT OF THE INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

FY 2016 Agency Financial Report—U.S. Department of Education 99
FINANCIAL SECTION

REPORT OF THE INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

100 FY 2016 Agency Financial Report—U.S. Department of Education
FINANCIAL SECTION

REPORT OF THE INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

FY 2016 Agency Financial Report—U.S. Department of Education 101
FINANCIAL SECTION

REPORT OF THE INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

102 FY 2016 Agency Financial Report—U.S. Department of Education
FINANCIAL SECTION

REPORT OF THE INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

FY 2016 Agency Financial Report—U.S. Department of Education 103
FINANCIAL SECTION

REPORT OF THE INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

104 FY 2016 Agency Financial Report—U.S. Department of Education
FINANCIAL SECTION

REPORT OF THE INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

FY 2016 Agency Financial Report—U.S. Department of Education 105
FINANCIAL SECTION

REPORT OF THE INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

106 FY 2016 Agency Financial Report—U.S. Department of Education
FINANCIAL SECTION

REPORT OF THE INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

FY 2016 Agency Financial Report—U.S. Department of Education 107
FINANCIAL SECTION

REPORT OF THE INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

108 FY 2016 Agency Financial Report—U.S. Department of Education
FINANCIAL SECTION

REPORT OF THE INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

FY 2016 Agency Financial Report—U.S. Department of Education 109
FINANCIAL SECTION

REPORT OF THE INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

110 FY 2016 Agency Financial Report—U.S. Department of Education
FINANCIAL SECTION

REPORT OF THE INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

FY 2016 Agency Financial Report—U.S. Department of Education 111
FINANCIAL SECTION

REPORT OF THE INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

112 FY 2016 Agency Financial Report—U.S. Department of Education
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>     5
<LEGEND>      THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL 
              INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE COMPANY'S
              FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE PERIOD
              ENDING DECEMBER 31, 1997, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
              ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
              STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>  1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                    DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                          $       121
<SECURITIES>                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                        11,720
<ALLOWANCES>                              0
<INVENTORY>                           9,650
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                     22,702
<PP&E>                               81,647
<DEPRECIATION>                       47,371
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                       66,237
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                10,471
<BONDS>                                 400
<COMMON>                              1,087
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                               0
<OTHER-SE>                           39,342
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>         66,237
<SALES>                              50,100
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                     50,100
<CGS>                                43,524
<TOTAL-COSTS>                        46,548
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       76
<INCOME-PRETAX>                       3,476
<INCOME-TAX>                          1,181
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                   2,295
<DISCONTINUED>                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                          2,295
<EPS-PRIMARY>                          2.11
<EPS-DILUTED>                          2.11
        

</TABLE>
With the identification of each new dangerous strain of influenza, scientists have expressed concern that the world is due for a pandemic -- a global outbreak.  The U.S. Department of Education is collaborating with health experts and agencies across the federal government to ensure that, in the case of a flu outbreak, critical operations and services will continue.  State and local preparedness will be crucial in preventing the spread of the virus.  Because schools are centers of community life, we ask that educators and administrators work with local officials to make planning for a flu outbreak a priority.  The tools below are designed to assist you in disseminating health information, planning for staff and student absences, and maintaining a learning environment.  **Show less**

With the identification of each new dangerous strain of influenza, scientists have expressed concern that the world is due for a pandemic...  **Show more**

**Continuity of learning during school dismissals**- Recommendations PDF
- Q&A for school leaders and teachers PDF
- Possible learning resources

**Flu Season School Guidance**- All children under 10 years of age should receive a second dose of the H1N1 flu vaccine.  (Jan 7, 2010)
- FERPA and H1N1: Guidance on disclosure of personally identifiable information when addressing an H1N1 flu outbreak. PDF (45K)
- Flu Vaccination Clinic at School: See tips for how to hold a flu vaccination clinic at your school. PDF
- PSA: Secretary Duncan tells how to reduce the risk of getting the flu and how to avoid falling behind if you're absent or your school is dismissed.
- Seasonal and Novel H1N1 Flu: A Guide for Parents (CDC) PDF
- Guidance on Providing Services to Children with Disabilities During an H1N1 Outbreak MSWord (136KB) |  PDF (56KB)
- Guidance on flexibility and waivers for SEAs, LEAs, postsecondary institutions, and other grantee and program participants MSWord (September 29, 2009) 
- Audio of Aug. 20 conference call with higher education stakeholders MP3 (5.3MB; 26 minutes)
- Audio of Aug. 20  conference call with higher education media MP3 (5.9MB; 29 minutes)
- Higher Ed Guidance
- Higher Ed Communication Toolkit
- Higher Ed Technical Report
- Press conference video
- Press release
- Guidance
- Report a Flu-related School Dismissal
- Communication toolkit for schools
- Prepare for Fall Flu Season and New HIN1 Virus (July 9 press release) 
- Letter on H1N1 flu preparations for 2009-10 school year (June 11, 2009)
- Blog posts

**Flu.gov** — One-stop access to U.S. Government seasonal, H1N1 (swine), H5N1 (bird), H3N2, and pandemic flu information.  Includes comprehensive information for community planning. 

**Emergency Planning: Influenza Outbreak**

|        |
|--------|
|   | Printable view |
|        |
**Exhibit
        32.1**
  CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO
 18
        U.S.C.
        SECTION 1350
 AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  In
        condition with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Polydex Pharmaceuticals
        Limited
        (the “Company”) for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2006 as filed with the
        Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, George
        G. Usher, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
        U.S.C.
        1350 as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
        that:
  (1)
              the
                  Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
                  15(d) of
                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2)
              the
                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                  respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                  Company.
  By /s/
        George G. Usher
 George
        G.
        Usher,
 Chief
        Executive Officer
 April
        28,
        2006
  A
        signed
        original of this written statement required by section 906 has been provided
        to
        the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
        and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### (A) The People of the State of New York v. Henry Fleischmann. (B) The People of the State of New York v. Damian Zacharczenko. (C) The People of the State of New York v. Carmine Di Biasi.

Enlargement of time granted. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, Valente and McNally, JJ.
#### 1604.7202 Large Provider Agreement clause.

The contracting officer will insert the clause set forth at section 1652.204-74 in all experience-rated FEHB Program contracts.
### §519a. Regulations

#### (a) In general

The Secretary may promulgate such regulations as are necessary to implement this title 1 and the amendments made by this title.1

#### (b) Procedure

The promulgation of the regulations and administration of this title 1 and the amendments made by this title 1 shall be made without regard to—

(1) the notice and comment provisions of section 553 of title 5;

(2) the Statement of Policy of the Secretary of Agriculture effective July 24, 1971 (36 Fed. Reg. 13804), relating to notices of proposed rulemaking and public participation in rulemaking; and

(3) chapter 35 of title 44 (commonly known as the "Paperwork Reduction Act").

#### (c) Congressional review of agency rulemaking

In carrying out this section, the Secretary shall use the authority provided under section 808 of title 5.

(Pub. L. 108–357, title VI, §642, Oct. 22, 2004, 118 Stat. 1535.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This title, referred to in subsecs. (a) and (b), means title VI of Pub. L. 108–357, which enacted this chapter, amended sections 609, 1282, 1301, 1303, 1314h, 1361, 1371, 1373, 1375, 1378, 1379, 1428, 1433c–1, and 1441 of this title and section 714c of Title 15, Commerce and Trade, repealed sections 511r, 515 to 515k, 625, 1311 to 1314, 1314–1, 1314b, 1314b–1, 1314b–2, 1314c to 1314j, 1315, 1316, 1445, 1445–1, and 1445–2 of this title, enacted provisions set out as notes under sections 515 and 518 of this title, and repealed provisions set out as a note under section 1314c of this title. For complete classification of title VI to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 518 of this title and Tables.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section applicable to the 2005 and subsequent crops of tobacco, see section 643 of Pub. L. 108–357, set out as a note under section 518 of this title.

1 See References in Text note below.
### §366. Repealed. Aug. 11, 1955, ch. 790, §2, 69 Stat. 674

Section, acts Mar. 16, 1906, ch. 951, §3, 34 Stat. 63; Feb. 24, 1925, ch. 308, §3, 43 Stat. 971, provided for annual reports by agricultural experiment stations to governors.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Existing Rights and Liabilities

Any rights or liabilities existing under this section as unaffected by repeal, see section 2 of act Aug. 11, 1955, set out as a note under section 361 of this title.
EPA SANITIZED Page 1 of 9
EPA SANITIZED Page 2 of 9
 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 3 of 9
 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 4 of 9
EPA SANITIZED Page 5 of 9
 

EPA SANITIZED Page 6 of 9
EPA SANITIZED Page 7 of 9
EPA SANITIZED Page 8 of 9
EPA SANITIZED Page 9 of 9
Case: 1:12-cv-01422 Document #: 37-2 Filed: 01/15/13 Page 1 of 6 PageID #:160
Case: 1:12-cv-01422 Document #: 37-2 Filed: 01/15/13 Page 2 of 6 PageID #:161
Case: 1:12-cv-01422 Document #: 37-2 Filed: 01/15/13 Page 3 of 6 PageID #:162
Case: 1:12-cv-01422 Document #: 37-2 Filed: 01/15/13 Page 4 of 6 PageID #:163
Case: 1:12-cv-01422 Document #: 37-2 Filed: 01/15/13 Page 5 of 6 PageID #:164
Case: 1:12-cv-01422 Document #: 37-2 Filed: 01/15/13 Page 6 of 6 PageID #:165
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk September 28, 2009

d0921 

# Order

September 28, 2009

131956

PEOPLE OF THE STAT E OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 131956 COA: 270676 Washtenaw CC: 05-001906-FH TARA LEE KERSEY, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the Ju ly 6, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
|   | · | The                Covered Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)                or                15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;                and                    |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                     |
|   | · | The                information contained in the Covered Report fairly presents, in all                material respects, the financial condition and results of operations                of                the Company. |

| Date:                March 3, 2006 | /s/ William                F.                Hecht                                   William                F. HechtPresidentPPL                Energy Supply, LLC |
|------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
```

[Federal Register: June 14, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 113)]
[Notices]               
[Page 33587]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr14jn10-33]                         

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION

 
Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: Wednesday, June 16, 2010; 10 a.m.-12 Noon.

PLACE: Hearing Room 420, Bethesda Towers, 4330 East West Highway, 
Bethesda, Maryland.

STATUS: Closed to the Public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

Compliance Status Report

    The Commission staff will brief the Commission on the status of 
compliance matters. For a recorded message containing the latest agenda 
information, call (301) 504-7948.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Todd A. Stevenson, Office of the 
Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West 
Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814 (301) 504-7923.

    Dated: June 8, 2010.
Todd A. Stevenson,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-14321 Filed 6-10-10; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6355-01-P
```
(June 15, 1964)

#### Fountain Springs Baptist Church, Inc., Formerly Known as Monumental Baptist Church, Inc., Appellant-Respondent, v. Sydney Snitow et al., Individually and as Copartners Doing Business under the Name of Snitow *&*Snitow, Respondents-Appellants.

Order, entered on February 3, 1964, denying motion by plaintiff and cross motion by defendants for summary judgment in action seeking declaratory judgment construing and enforcing settlement documents, unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of granting the motion of plaintiff for summary judgment declaring that plaintiff is not indebted to defendants for any sums or obligations antedating the general release of May 8, 1961, except for the payment of the balance of the outstanding mortgage debt in accordance with its express terms appearing from the mortgage documents, and the order is otherwise affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to plaintiff-appellant-respondent. The *765general release of the Reverend Nelson C. Dukes and the church, dated May 8, 1961, executed pursuant to the stipulation of settlement, excluded from its terms only the mortgage debt. Therefore the claim for the out-of-pocket disbursements was released. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Valente, Stevens, Steuer and Staley, JJ.
#### Eugenia Wegorzewski, Respondent, et al., Plaintiff, v. De Mattia Machine & Tool Company, Inc., Defendant-Appellant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant. R. C. Molding, Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent.

Motion to dismiss appeal denied on condition that appellant argue or submit the appeal at the November Term, beginning October 31, 1960. The appeal is ordered to be placed on the calendar for said term. The record and appellant’s brief must be served and filed on or before October 20, 1960. Nolan, P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur.
Case: 1:12-cv-00884 Document #: 4 Filed: 03/20/12 Page 1 of 7 PageID #:13

FILED 4/12/2012

THOMAS G. BRUTON CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT

Case: 1:12-cv-00884 Document #: 7 Filed: 04/12/12 Page 1 of 7 PageID #:28
Case: 1:12-cv-00884 Document #: 4 Filed: 03/20/12 Page 2 of 7 PageID #:14 Case: 1:12-cv-00884 Document #: 7 Filed: 04/12/12 Page 2 of 7 PageID #:28
Case: 1:12-cv-00884 Document #: 4 Filed: 03/20/12 Page 3 of 7 PageID #:15 Case: 1:12-cv-00884 Document #: 7 Filed: 04/12/12 Page 3 of 7 PageID #:28
Case: 1:12-cv-00884 Document #: 4 Filed: 03/20/12 Page 4 of 7 PageID #:16 Case: 1:12-cv-00884 Document #: 7 Filed: 04/12/12 Page 4 of 7 PageID #:28
Case: 1:12-cv-00884 Document #: 4 Filed: 03/20/12 Page 5 of 7 PageID #:17 Case: 1:12-cv-00884 Document #: 7 Filed: 04/12/12 Page 5 of 7 PageID #:28
Case: 1:12-cv-00884 Document #: 4 Filed: 03/20/12 Page 6 of 7 PageID #:18 Case: 1:12-cv-00884 Document #: 7 Filed: 04/12/12 Page 6 of 7 PageID #:28
Case: 1:12-cv-00884 Document #: 4 Filed: 03/20/12 Page 7 of 7 PageID #:19 Case: 1:12-cv-00884 Document #: 7 Filed: 04/12/12 Page 7 of 7 PageID #:28
No. 8179.

#### Careno *v.*The State of Ohio.

(Decided December 8, 1903.)

Error to Circuit Court of Summit county.

*Messrs. Wilcox & Grant*and *Mr. W. A. Spencer,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. H. M. HageTbarger,*prosecuting attorney, and *Messrs. Allen, Waters A Andress,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Spear, Shauck and Crew, JJ., concur.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7242

JAMES LEE POWERS, JR.,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

A. DAVID ROBINSON, Warden,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior

District Judge. (CA-98-193)

Submitted: February 25, 1999 Decided: March 8, 1999

Before HAMILTON, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Lee Powers, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Richard Bain Smith,

Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

James Lee Powers, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254

(West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on

the reasoning of the district court. See Powers v. Robinson, No.

CA-98-193 (E.D. Va. July 31, 1998). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED
### §§31, 32. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Sections 31 and 32 were formerly transferred to sections 1971 and 1972, respectively, of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as sections 10101 and 10102, respectively, of Title 52, Voting and Elections.
M. P. No. 74-200.

#### John Jennings *et al. v.*Exeter-West Greenwich Regional School District Committee.

*Goldman, Biafore & Hines, John D. Biafore,*for plaintiffs-respondents. *Bradford Gorham,*for defendant-petitioner; *Amato A. DeLuca,*for American Civil Liberties Union, amicus curiae.

Motion of American Civil Liberties Union to intervene as amicus curiae is granted.
#### Irene R. Lacks, Appellant, v Kenneth R. Marcus et al., Respondents. K. Richard Marcus et al., Plaintiffs, v Irene R. Lacks, Defendant.

Order of the Supreme Court, New York County, entered June 2,1978, which denied defendants’ motion for an order of preclusion for plaintiff’s failure to serve a bill of particulars, but directed service thereof and denied plaintiff’s cross motion for vacatur or modification of defendants’ demand for the bill of particulars, unanimously modified, without costs and disbursements, on the law and the facts, to grant plaintiff’s cross motion to the extent of deleting the requests contained in the demand for the bill of particulars for the names of various witnesses and, as so modified, otherwise affirmed. Plaintiff’s time to serve the bill of particulars is extended to 30 days from the date of service upon her of a copy of the order herein, with notice of entry. Although defendants’ demand for a bill of particulars contains approximately 150 items, we note that the complaint in the two causes of action, alleges that defendants committed 26 separate acts of malpractice. We agree with Special Term that in this framework the demand for particulars herein is not excessive, burdensome, or oppressive. The demand for the bill of particulars "must be viewed in the light of the pleading it is intended to particularize” (3 Weinstein-Korn-Miller, NY Civ Prac, par *7613041.11, p 30-721; see, also, Practice Commentaries, McKinney’s Cons Laws of NY, Book 7B, CPLR 3041, C3041:4). However, the demand for the names of the individuals to the various conversations between plaintiff and defendant is inappropriate. Concur—Birns, J. P., Fein, Lane, Lynch and Sandler, JJ.
#### § 651.19 Record of environmental consideration.

A Record of Environmental Consideration (REC) is a signed statement submitted with project documentation that briefly documents that an Army action has received environmental review. RECs are prepared for CXs that require them, and for actions covered by existing or previous NEPA documentation. A REC briefly describes the proposed action and timeframe, identifies the proponent and approving official(s), and clearly shows how an action qualifies for a CX, or is already covered in an existing EA or EIS. When used to support a CX, the REC must address the use of screening criteria to ensure that no extraordinary circumstances or situations exist. A REC has no prescribed format, as long as the above information is included. To reduce paperwork, a REC can reference such documents as real estate Environmental Baseline Studies (EBSs) and other documents, as long as they are readily available for review. While a REC may document compliance with the requirements of NEPA, it does not fulfill the requirements of other environmental laws and regulations. Figure 3 illustrates a possible format for the REC as follows:

[![](https://img.federalregister.gov/ER29MR02.002/ER29MR02.002_large.png)](https://img.federalregister.gov/ER29MR02.002/ER29MR02.002_original_size.png)