alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF THE PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Chase General Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Barry M. Yantis, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                  |  |  |  |                                                           |  | 
|----------------- |  |  |  | --------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|                  |  |  | 
|November 12, 2010 |  |  |  | LOGO                                                      |  | 
|Date              |  |  |  | By: Barry M. Yantis
President and Chief Executive Officer |  | 



24
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 5.0.3

Eastern Division

Hard Drive Productions, Inc.

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:12−cv−01532

Honorable Edmond E. Chang

Does 1−54, et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Friday, August 24, 2012:

 MINUTE entry before Honorable Edmond E. Chang: Because the the motion to

compel [13], and motions to quash [12, 18], are still under advisement, the status hearing

of 08/27/12 is reset to 10/04/12 at 8:30 a.m. Mailed notice(slb, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:12-cv-01532 Document #: 33 Filed: 08/24/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:236
# Quarterly

# GA Volume

# Historical
Exhibit 31.2


                         CERTIFICATION OF VICE PRESIDENT
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Peter Porath, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Federal Mortgage
Corporation of Puerto Rico, Inc.

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date.

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or
in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date:  November 17, 2006


/s/ Peter Porath
-----------------------------------
Peter Porath
Vice President


                                       12
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except underthe limited circumstancesset forth inLocalRule

47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-30706

Summary Calendar

DORIS SMALL,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

DAVID RAMSEY, Secretary of

Department of Health & Hospitals,

d/b/a Natchitoches Mental Health

Clinic,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Western District of Louisiana

(92-CV-1820)

January 30, 1996

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, SMITH and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Doris A. Small appeals an adverse judgment following a bench trial of her

employment-discrimination action under Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. She contends

that: (1) the district court made an erroneous evidentiary ruling, (2) the evidence was

insufficient to support the verdict, and (3) the defendant should not have been awarded the

costs of court. Our review of the briefs and pertinent parts of the record discloses no

reversible error. Accordingly, we AFFIRM.
1 From:
Sent: Monday, July 20, 2015 12:59 PM

To: RedHill Subject: Red Hill Aquifer

Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged

Aloha;

There is no rationale in keeping the fuel supply in and around the aquifer at Red Hill on Oahu.

Any potential or likely contamination of precious drinking water is far and away more important than saving the US Government money by allowing fuel to be stored in a potentially hazardous locati on. Past tests have shown contamination and there is simply no way to guarantee the wate r will be kept safe for human consumption.

The cost to the people of Hawaii is far more than any cost to the military. Our water is precious and so are our people, who rely on clean, safe water.

Mahalo.
### §2160. Prohibition on slaughter of dogs and cats for human consumption

#### (a) In general

Except as provided in subsection (c), no person may—

(1) knowingly slaughter a dog or cat for human consumption; or

(2) knowingly ship, transport, move, deliver, receive, possess, purchase, sell, or donate—

(A) a dog or cat to be slaughtered for human consumption; or

(B) a dog or cat part for human consumption.

#### (b) Scope

Subsection (a) shall apply only with respect to conduct—

(1) in or affecting interstate commerce or foreign commerce; or

(2) within the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States.

#### (c) Exception for Indian tribes

The prohibition in subsection (a) shall not apply to an Indian (as defined in section 5304 of title 25) carrying out any activity described in subsection (a) for the purpose of a religious ceremony.

#### (d) Penalty

Any person who violates subsection (a) shall be subject to a fine in an amount not greater than $5,000 for each violation.

#### (e) Effect on State law

Nothing in this section—

(1) limits any State or local law or regulation protecting the welfare of animals; or

(2) prevents a State or unit of local government from adopting and enforcing an animal welfare law or regulation that is more stringent than this section.

(Pub. L. 115–334, title XII, §12515, Dec. 20, 2018, 132 Stat. 5000.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Agriculture Improvement Act of 2018, and not as part of the Animal Welfare Act which comprises this chapter.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF
INCOME AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         281,717
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  445,131
<ALLOWANCES>                                    21,396
<INVENTORY>                                    419,724
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,249,966
<PP&E>                                         874,274
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0<F1>
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,456,027
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          553,897
<BONDS>                                      1,127,550
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       120,570
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,242,362
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,456,027
<SALES>                                        361,744
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               817,230
<CGS>                                          249,705
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  575,462
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              29,542
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 37,089
<INCOME-TAX>                                    13,184
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             23,197
<DISCONTINUED>                                 (3,458)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    19,739
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.18
<FN>
<F1>This amount is not disclosed in the financial statements and thus a value of
zero has been shown for purposes of this financial data schedule.
</FN>


</TABLE>
### §3806. Criminal penalties

(a) Whoever willfully violates any provision of this chapter or the regulations of the Secretary issued hereunder shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and shall be fined not more than $10,000, or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.

(b) Any person who fails to obey any order of the Secretary issued under the provisions of section 3804 of this title, or such order as modified—

(1) after the expiration of the time allowed for filing a petition in the court of appeals to review such order, if no such petition has been filed within such time; or

(2) after the expiration of the time allowed for applying for a writ of certiorari, if such order, or such order as modified, has been sustained by the court of appeals and no such writ has been applied for within such time; or

(3) after such order, or such order as modified, has been sustained by the courts as provided in section 3804(b) of this title;

shall on conviction be fined not more than $10,000, or imprisoned for not more than one year, or both. Each day during which such failure continues shall be deemed a separate offense.

(Pub. L. 96–468, §7, Oct. 17, 1980, 94 Stat. 2231.)
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 9 (Thursday, January 14, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 3150]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-00680]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 190-105]


Moon Lake Electric Association, Inc.; Notice of Effectiveness of 
Withdrawal of License Application

    On January 31, 2017, Moon Lake Electric Association, Inc. (Moon 
Lake) filed an application for a new license for the 1.2-megawatt 
Uintah Hydroelectric Project No. 190. On December 23, 2020, Moon Lake 
filed a notice of withdrawal of its application. Moon Lake states that 
the anticipated cost of operating the project under the new license 
will render the project uneconomic.
    No motion in opposition to the notice of withdrawal has been filed, 
and the Commission has taken no action to disallow the withdrawal. 
Pursuant to Rule 216(b) of the Commission's Rules of Practice and 
Procedure,\1\ the withdrawal of the application became effective on 
January 8, 2021, and this proceeding is hereby terminated. Commission 
staff are concurrently issuing a letter to Moon Lake requiring it to 
file an application to surrender the project.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 18 CFR 385.216(b) (2020).

    Dated: January 8, 2021.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-00680 Filed 1-13-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
### §1571. Purposes

#### (a) Purposes

The purposes of this subchapter are to—

(1) provide the Immigration and Naturalization Service with the mechanisms it needs to eliminate the current backlog in the processing of immigration benefit applications within 1 year after October 17, 2000, and to maintain the elimination of the backlog in future years; and

(2) provide for regular congressional oversight of the performance of the Immigration and Naturalization Service in eliminating the backlog and processing delays in immigration benefits adjudications.

#### (b) Policy

It is the sense of Congress that the processing of an immigration benefit application should be completed not later than 180 days after the initial filing of the application, except that a petition for a nonimmigrant visa under section 1184(c) of this title should be processed not later than 30 days after the filing of the petition.

(Pub. L. 106–313, title II, §202, Oct. 17, 2000, 114 Stat. 1262.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Short Title

For short title of title II of Pub. L. 106–313, which enacted this subchapter, as the "Immigration Services and Infrastructure Improvements Act of 2000", see section 201 of Pub. L. 106–313, set out as a Short Title of 2000 Amendment note under section 1551 of this title.

#### Abolition of Immigration and Naturalization Service and Transfer of Functions

For abolition of Immigration and Naturalization Service, transfer of functions, and treatment of related references, see note set out under section 1551 of this title.
#### 1533.103 Protests to the Agency.

Protests to the Agency are processed pursuant to the requirements of FAR 33.103. Contracting Officers must include in every solicitation the provision at 1552.233-70, Notice of Filing Requirements for Agency Protests.

[64 FR 17110, Apr. 8, 1999]
### Filed 2/21/19 by Clerk of Supreme Court IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2019 ND 33 Michael Keondre Smith, Petitioner and Appellant
v. State of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee No. 20180276 Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Centra l Judicial District, the Honorable Cynthia M. Feland, Judge. AFFIRMED. Per Curiam. Scott O. Diamond , Fargo, ND, for petitioner and appellant; submitted on brief. Marina Spahr , Assistant State’s Attorney, Bismarck, ND, for respondent and appellee; submitted on brief.Smith v. State No. 20180276 Per Curiam. [¶1] Michael Keondre Smith appealed from a district court order denying his application for post-conviction relief. Smith argues that he re ceived ineffective assistance of counsel based on his trial counsel’s failure to r easonably investigate prior to trial and failure to call a police officer as a witnes s. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2)
. See Steinbach v. State , 2015 ND 34, ¶ 10 , 859 N.W.2d 1 (“[t]he applicant must first overcome the strong presumption counsel’s representation fell within the wide range of reasonable profess ional assistance.”). [¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J. Jerod E. Tufte Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Jon J. Jensen

1
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Federal Screw Works (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Quarterly Report"), I, W. T. ZurSchmiede, Jr., Chairman of the Board, Chief
Financial Officer, Secretary of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

      (1)   The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
and

      (2)   The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.

                                           /s/ W. T. ZurSchmiede, Jr.
                                           ---------------------------------
                                           W. T. ZurSchmiede, Jr., Chairman,
                                           Chief Financial Officer and
                                           Secretary of Federal Screw Works

Dated:  February 11, 2005
#### 1433.209 Suspected fraudulent claims.

The CO shall refer all matters relating to suspected fraudulent claims by a contractor or individual to the OIG for further action or investigation.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Robert Dingman, Appellant.

Order reversed and judgment of conviction vacated and ease remanded to the Broome County Court for compliance with section 1943 of the Penal Law. Bergan, P. J., Gibson, Reynolds and Taylor, JJ., concur.
#### 1403.704 Policy.

The HCA is authorized to declare void and rescind contracts in accordance with the procedures in FAR 3.705.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RACHEL YOULD,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

LINDA S. BARNARD, Ph.D., LMFT; et al.,

Defendants

- Appellees. No. 18

- 16968

D.C. No. 5:18

- cv

- 01255

- EJD

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of California Edward J. Davila, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 11, 2019 **

Before: CANBY, GRABER, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.

Rachel Yould appeals from the district court’s order denying her motion for

reconsideration in her diversity action arising out of the service s provided to Yould

by defendants in connection with her criminal prosecution

. We have jurisdi ction

under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion

. Sch. Dist. No. 1J,

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

JUN 14 2019

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 18

- 16968

Multnomah Cty., Or. v. ACandS, Inc ., 5 F.3d 1255, 1262 (9th Cir. 1993). We

affirm.

We have an independent obligation to determine the district court ’ s

jurisdiction, see Chapman v. Pier 1 Imports (U.S.), Inc ., 631 F.3d 939, 954 (9th

Cir. 2011), and we conclude on the basis of clarifications provided by Yould in her

objections to the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations, that the district

court had subject matter jurisdiction over this action. See 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a)

(requirements for diversity jurisdiction).

The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Yould’s motion for

reconsideration because Yould failed to establish any basis for such relief. See

Sch. Dist. No. 1J, Multnomah Cty.

, 5 F.3d at 1262

- 63 (grounds for reconsideration

under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) and 60(b) ) ; see also McHenry v. Renne , 84 F.3d 1172,

1179

- 80 (9th Cir. 1996) (affirming dismissal under Rule 8, and recognizing that

“[p]rolix, confusing complaints

. . . impose unfair burdens on litigants and

judges”).

We do not consider mat ters not specifically and distinctly raised and argued

in the opening brief, or arguments and allegations raise d for the first time on

appeal. See Padgett v. Wright , 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

AFFIRMED.
#### Hazel M. Reed, Respondent, v. William W. Millington et al., Appellants.

*Per Curiam.*

This appeal does not lie as of. right and permission to appeal has not been sought or granted. (See CPLR 5701, subd. [b], par. 2; *9783 Weinstein-Korn-Miller, N. Y. Civ. Prac., par. 3014.09.) Appeal dismissed, with $25 costs. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds, Aulisi and Hamm, JJ., concur.