alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 99.2
                                                                    ------------


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Fairmount Chemical Co., Inc.
("Fairmount") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, William C. Kaltnecker, Controller/Treasurer of Fairmount, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Fairmount.




---------------------
William C. Kaltnecker
Controller/Treasurer
December 23, 2002
### §1601. Statements of national policy concerning welfare and immigration

The Congress makes the following statements concerning national policy with respect to welfare and immigration:

(1) Self-sufficiency has been a basic principle of United States immigration law since this country's earliest immigration statutes.

(2) It continues to be the immigration policy of the United States that—

(A) aliens within the Nation's borders not depend on public resources to meet their needs, but rather rely on their own capabilities and the resources of their families, their sponsors, and private organizations, and

(B) the availability of public benefits not constitute an incentive for immigration to the United States.

(3) Despite the principle of self-sufficiency, aliens have been applying for and receiving public benefits from Federal, State, and local governments at increasing rates.

(4) Current eligibility rules for public assistance and unenforceable financial support agreements have proved wholly incapable of assuring that individual aliens not burden the public benefits system.

(5) It is a compelling government interest to enact new rules for eligibility and sponsorship agreements in order to assure that aliens be self-reliant in accordance with national immigration policy.

(6) It is a compelling government interest to remove the incentive for illegal immigration provided by the availability of public benefits.

(7) With respect to the State authority to make determinations concerning the eligibility of qualified aliens for public benefits in this chapter, a State that chooses to follow the Federal classification in determining the eligibility of such aliens for public assistance shall be considered to have chosen the least restrictive means available for achieving the compelling governmental interest of assuring that aliens be self-reliant in accordance with national immigration policy.

(Pub. L. 104–193, title IV, §400, Aug. 22, 1996, 110 Stat. 2260.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in par. (7), was in the original "this title" meaning title IV of Pub. L. 104–193, Aug. 22, 1996, 110 Stat. 2260, which enacted this chapter, section 1183a of this title, and sections 611a and 1437y of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, amended section 1383 of this title, sections 32 and 6213 of Title 26, Internal Revenue Code, and sections 1436a and 1471 of Title 42, and enacted provisions set out as notes under section 1183a of this title and section 32 of Title 26. For complete classification of title IV to the Code, see Tables.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Short Title of 2008 Amendment

Pub. L. 110–328, §1, Sept. 30, 2008, 122 Stat. 3567, provided that: "This Act [amending section 1612 of this title and sections 3304, 6103, and 6402 of Title 26, Internal Revenue Code, and enacting provisions set out as a note under section 3304 of Title 26] may be cited as the 'SSI Extension for Elderly and Disabled Refugees Act'."
Exhibit 10.14
 FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE
BOB EVANS FARMS, INC. AND AFFILIATES
THIRD AMENDED AND RESTATED
EXECUTIVE DEFERRAL PROGRAM
      Pre-2008 Deferrals
 In-Service Distribution Account
 Education Distribution Account




---



##### 



Retirement Distribution Account
 Substantially Equal Installments
  Post-2008 Deferrals
 Nonqualified Employee Deferral Account
 In-Service Distributions




---



##### 



Distributions Upon Death or Disability
 Distributions Upon Separation from Service
  Employer Nonqualified Matching Account and Discretionary Employer Contribution
Account
 Installments




---



##### 



BOB EVANS FARMS, INC./s/ Joe EulbergPrinted Name:
    J. R. EulbergIts: Senior V.P., H.R.
## COURT OF APPEALS

SANDEE BRYAN MARION

CHIEF JUSTICE

KAREN ANGELINI

MARIALYN BARNARD

REBECA C. MARTINEZ

PATRICIA O. ALVAREZ

LUZ ELENA D. CHAPA

JASON PULLIAM

JUSTICES FOURTH COURT OF APPE ALS DISTRICT

CADENA

- REEVES JUSTICE CENTE R

300 DOLOROSA, SUIT E 3200

SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 7 8205

- 3037

WWW.TXCOURTS.GOV/4TH COA.ASPX KEITH E. HOTTLE

CLERK OF COURT

TELEPHONE

(210) 335

- 2635

FACSIMILE NO.

(210) 335

- 2762

April 16, 2015

Shawn Darrick Sheffield

Law Office of Shawn Sheffield

8406 Fountain Circl e

San Antonio, TX 78229

- 2387

* DELIVERED VIA E

- MAIL *

David Philip Martin

Bexar Co unty Criminal District Attorney

Paul Elizondo Tower

San Antonio, TX 78205

* DELIVERED VIA E

- MAIL * Nicolas A. Lahood

District Attorney, Bexar County

101 W. Nueva, Suite 370

San Antonio, TX 78205

* DELIVERED VIA E

- MAIL *

RE: Court of Appeals Number: 04

- 15

- 00082

- CV

Trial Court Case Number: 2013

- PA

- 00544

Style: In the Interest of R.C.

Enclosed please find the order which the Honorable Court of Appeals has

issued in reference to the above styled and numbered cause.

If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me.

Very truly yours,

KEITH E. HOTTLE, CLERK

_____________________________ Elizabeth Montoya

Deputy Clerk, Ext. 5

- 3857

# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 16, 2015

N o. 04

- 15

- 00082

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF R.C.,

From the 288th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013

- PA

- 00544

Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

A p pellant’s motion for extension of time is GRANTED. Appellant’s brief is due on May

3, 2015. NO FURTHER EXTENSIONS WILL BE GRANTED.

_________________________________ Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 16th day of April, 2015

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
From: Eck, Janet

To: Maxwell, Bill

Cc: Wayland, Robertj ; Culligan, Kevin ; Fruh, Steve ; Thompson, Fred

Subject: FW: Sent to OMB - 5663, "Mercury and Air Toxics Standard (MATS) - New Source MACT Reconsideration"

Date: Tuesday, March 05, 2013 3:24:22 PM

Attachments: EO12866_MATS_Reconsideration_2060-AR62_Final_20130305.docx image001.png

From: Dougherty, Joseph-J

Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2013 3:03 PM

To: Eck, Janet

Cc: Henigin, Mary; Rush, Alan Subject: FW: Sent to OMB - 5663, 'Mercury and Air Toxics Standard (MATS) - New Source MACT Reconsideration'

From: Cole, Amy

Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2013 2:54 PM

To: Cristofaro, Alexander; Kime, Robin; Owens, Nicole; Schaaff, Lesley; Singelis, Nikos; Cubeddu, Mariana; Pritchard, Eileen; Schillo, Bruce; Balserak, Paul; Free, Laura; Thundiyil, Karen

Cc: Dougherty, Joseph-J; Rush, Alan; Henigin, Mary; farrar, wanda; morgan, ruthw; OAR Special Assistants; Eagles, Tom; Shaw, Betsy; Mcquilkin, Wendy Subject: Sent to OMB - 5663, 'Mercury and Air Toxics Standard (MATS) - New Source MACT Reconsideration'

Today, 3/5/2013, I uploaded to OMB OAR's 'Mercury and Air Toxics Standard (MATS)

- New Source MACT Reconsideration' (SAN 5663). This

package is a Tier 1 Final action. This is a Expedited review. ADP Tracker has been updated.

Thank you,

Amy Cole

Office of Policy

US Environmental Protection Agency

202.564.6535
### §3601. Definitions

For purposes of this chapter—

(1) The term "Agreement" means the International Sugar Agreement, 1977, signed at New York City on December 9, 1977.

(2) The term "sugar" has the same meaning as is given to such term in paragraph (12) of Article 2 of the Agreement.

(3) The term "entry" means entry, or withdrawal from warehouse, for consumption in the customs territory of the United States.

(Pub. L. 96–236, §1, Apr. 22, 1980, 94 Stat. 336.)
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

THE SECRETARY

MEMORANDUM

TO: The Chief Information Officer

FROM: The Secretary

SUBJECT: Delegation of Domestic Travel Authority

I. DELEGATION

Under the authority vested in me by section 412 of the Department of Education 

Organization Act, 20 U.S.C. 3472, I hereby delegate to you, and to anyone serving for 

you in an acting capacity, the authority for domestic travel, which must be exercised in 

accordance with 41 CFR Chapters 300-304, commonly known as the Federal Travel 

Regulations. Domestic travel is defined as travel within the Continental United States 

(CONUS) and non-foreign travel areas. The term ‘non-foreign travel areas’ as used in 

this delegation refers to the States of Alaska and Hawaii, the Commonwealths of Guam, 

Puerto Rico, and the Northern Mariana Islands, and the territories and possessions of the 

United States such as American Samoa and the Virgin Islands, and excludes the Trust 

Territories of the Pacific Islands. 

Unless otherwise noted in future delegations of authority, amendments to the authority 

cited are included within the scope of this delegation.

II. RESERVATIONS

The authority to approve international is reserved to the Secretary or his or her delegatee. 

International travel is travel outside the CONUS and non-foreign travel areas.

III. REDELEGATION

This authority may be redelegated.
Page 2 – Delegation of Domestic Travel Authority

IV. Certification and Effective Date

This delegation is effective upon certification by the Department’s Principal Delegation 

Control Officer. It supersedes all previous delegations of this authority.

_____________/s/________________

Margaret Spellings

OGC Clearance and Date: /s/ David Berthiaume, 10/24/2008

Certified Date: 10/30/2008

Departmental Delegations Control Officer: /s/ Naty G. Beetle

Control Number: EA/EI/14
#### The People of the State of New York v. Joseph A. Johhson.

Motion for leave to appeal as a poor person granted insofar as to permit the appeal to be heard on the original record, without printing the same, except that a certified copy of the information shall be substituted in place of the original information, and upon typewritten or mimeographed appellant’s points, on condition that the appellant serves one copy of the typewritten or mimeographed appellant’s points upon the District Attorney of New York County, and files 6 typewritten or 19 mimeographed copies of appellant’s points, together with the' original record, with this court and on the further condition that the appeal be perfected and noticed for argument for the January 1961 Term of this court. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, Valente and McNally, JJ.
14.408-7 Documentation of award. ( a ) The contracting officer shall document compliance with 14.103-2 in the contract file.
( b ) The documentation shall either state that the accepted bid was the lowest bid received, or list all lower bids with reasons for their rejection in sufficient detail to justify the award.
( c ) When an award is made after receipt of equal low bids, the documentation shall describe how the tie was broken.
[48 FR 42171, Sept. 19, 1983. Redesignated at 60 FR 34738, July 3, 1995]
<Page>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 99


                        TXU GAS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
                   CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED INCOME
                                   (UNAUDITED)


<Table>
<Caption>

                                                             TWELVE MONTHS ENDED
                                                                    JUNE 30,
                                                             -------------------
                                                              2001        2000
                                                             -------     -------
                                                             MILLIONS OF DOLLARS
<S>                                                          <C>         <C>
Operating revenues.....................................      $ 8,045     $ 4,737
                                                             -------     -------

 Operating expenses
    Energy purchased for resale........................        7,507       4,182
    Operation and maintenance..........................          340         355
    Depreciation and other amortization................           64          63
    Goodwill amortization..............................           21          21
    Taxes other than income............................           94          60
                                                             -------     -------
        Total operating expenses.......................        8,026       4,681
                                                             -------     -------

Operating income ......................................           19          56

Other income (deductions) - net........................           14          69
                                                            --------     -------

Income before interest, other charges and income taxes.           33         125

Interest income........................................           15          --

Interest expense and other charges.....................          (90)        (76)
                                                             -------     -------

Income (loss) before income taxes......................          (42)         49

Income tax expense (benefit)...........................           (7)         13
                                                             -------     -------

Net income (loss)......................................          (35)         36

Preferred stock dividends..............................            4           4
                                                             -------     -------

Net income (loss) applicable to common stock...........      $   (39)    $    32
                                                             =======     =======

</Table>
#### § 37.830 May I let a recipient charge pre-award costs to the agreement?

Pre-award costs, as long as they are otherwise allowable costs of the project, may be charged to an expenditure-based TIA only with the specific approval of the agreements officer. All pre-award costs are incurred at the recipient's risk (*i.e.,* no DoD Component is obligated to reimburse the costs if for any reason the recipient does not receive an award or if the award is less than anticipated and inadequate to cover the costs).
Case: 1:12-cv-00377 Document #: 57 Filed: 05/22/12 Page 1 of 8 PageID #:1746
Case: 1:12-cv-00377 Document #: 57 Filed: 05/22/12 Page 2 of 8 PageID #:1747
Case: 1:12-cv-00377 Document #: 57 Filed: 05/22/12 Page 3 of 8 PageID #:1748
Case: 1:12-cv-00377 Document #: 57 Filed: 05/22/12 Page 4 of 8 PageID #:1749
Case: 1:12-cv-00377 Document #: 57 Filed: 05/22/12 Page 5 of 8 PageID #:1750
Case: 1:12-cv-00377 Document #: 57 Filed: 05/22/12 Page 6 of 8 PageID #:1751
Case: 1:12-cv-00377 Document #: 57 Filed: 05/22/12 Page 7 of 8 PageID #:1752
Case: 1:12-cv-00377 Document #: 57 Filed: 05/22/12 Page 8 of 8 PageID #:1753
### §302. Incorporation by reference

Sections 202, 203, 204, 205, and 207 of this title shall apply to this chapter as if specifically set forth herein, except that for the purposes of this chapter "the Convention" shall mean the Inter-American Convention.

(Added Pub. L. 101–369, §1, Aug. 15, 1990, 104 Stat. 448.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective upon the entry into force of the Inter-American Convention on International Commercial Arbitration of January 30, 1975, with respect to the United States (Oct. 27, 1990), see section 3 of Pub. L. 101–369, set out as a note under section 301 of this title.
Case: 1:11-cv-07934 Document #: 28 Filed: 12/08/11 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:80
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Harold Herbert Duchin, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, rendered July 1, 1963 on his plea of guilty, convicting him of attempted rape in the second degree, and imposing sentence upon him as a *prior*felony offender. Judgment affirmed. While sentence was imposed upon defendant as “ a prior felony offender,” we construe such sentence, in the light of *the*entire record, to have been imposed upon the defendant as a second felony offender. [For prior appeal, see 16 A D 2d 483, affd. 12 N Y 2d 351.] Beldoek, P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Brennan and Hill, JJ., concur.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST

COMPANY, AS TRUSTEE FOR GSAMP

TRUST 2006-SD3 MORTGAGE PASS

THROUGH CERTIFICATES, 

SERIES 2006-SD3,

Plaintiff

V.

BRENDA A. KING; STANLEY KING; UM

CAPITAL, LLC; MIDLAND CREDIT

MANAGEMENT, INC,

Defendants

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No: 1:l2-CV-00296

Judge: Edmond E. Chang

MOTION FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT OF FORECLOSURE NUNC PRO TUNC

NOW COMES the Plaintiff, U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS 

TRUSTEE UNDER THE POOLING AND SERVICING AGREEMENT, DATED AS OF

JANUARY 1, 2004, 2004-CB1 TRUST, C-BASS MORTGAGE LOAN ASSET-BACKED 

CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2004-CB1, by and through its attorney, Kimberly J. Goodell, and 

moves this Honorable Court for Entry of Judgment of Foreclosure Nunc Pro Tunc to April 16, 

2013. In support thereof, Plaintiff states as follows:

1. On January 13, 2012, Plaintiff filed its Complaint to Foreclose Mortgage.

2. On August 3, 2012 Plaintiff filed its Motion for Summary Judgment requesting the Court 

enter a judgment of foreclosure in favor of Plaintiff.

3. On April 16, 2013 the Court granted summary judgment in favor of the Plaintiff.

4. For reasons unknown to new counsel, a Judgment of Foreclosure was never entered in 

this matter.

5. Therefore, Plaintiff seeks a judgment of foreclosure nunc pro tunc April 16, 2013 so that 

Plaintiff may proceed with the sale of this foreclosed property.

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully requests that a Judgment of Foreclosure be entered 

in this case, with a nunc pro tunc date of April 16, 2013, so that the Plaintiff can move forward 

with the sale of this foreclosed property.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Kimberly J. Goodell
Kimberly J. Goodell ARDC#6305436

Potestivo & Associates, P.C.

223 West Jackson Blvd, suite 610

Chicago, IL 60601

kgoodell@potestivolaw.com

(312)263-0003
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Hawks
Industries, Inc. 3rd Qtr. 1997 10Q and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such 10Q.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000015678
<NAME> HAWKS INDUSTRIES, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          24,000
<SECURITIES>                                   253,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                  464,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      9,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               805,000
<PP&E>                                       4,313,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,176,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,399,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          879,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       270,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,820,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,399,000
<SALES>                                      1,647,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,664,000
<CGS>                                        1,474,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,843,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              53,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (186,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (186,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (186,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.01)
        

</TABLE>
M. P. No. 75-91.

#### Providence Journal Company *v.*Rhode Island Commission for Human Rights.

*Edwards & Angelí, Joseph V. Cavanagh, Jr., Bloom, Deutsch, Rosenwald, Weintraub and Witkin,*Boston, Mass., *Robert P. Weintraub, Richard A. Perras,*of counsel, for petitioner. *Abedon, Stanzler, Biener, Skolnik & Lipsey, Milton Stanzler,*for Intervenor Jacqueline Mason.

Petition of Jacqueline Mason, intervenor, for writ of certiorari is granted.

Joslin, J. not participating.
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

We hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Form 10-QSB of Reliability Incorporated (the Issuer) for the quarterly period ended
March 31, 2006 (the Periodic Report):



| | 1. | Fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |  |  |                        
|----------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|/s/ Larry Edwards       |  |  |  | /s/ Carl V. Schmidt    
|Larry Edwards           |  |  |  | Carl V. Schmidt        
|Chief Executive Officer |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer
|May 11, 2006            |  |  |  | May 11, 2006