alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Leaford K. Daniels, Respondent, v Louise P. Daniels, Appellant.

In an action in which the plaintiff was granted a judgment of divorce, defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated December 8, 1977, which granted plaintiff’s motion to delete the child support provision thereof. Order reversed, without costs or disbursements, and matter remanded to Special Term for a hearing on the question of the service of the order to show cause by which this motion was initiated. Although we are reversing the order under review because the defendant has raised the procedural questions of improper service and the lack of jurisdiction of Special Term to act without a hearing first being held with respect thereto, there would seem to be no substance to the defendant’s position on the merits since the child of the marriage is now emancipated. O’Connor, J. P., Shapiro, Cohalan and Hargett, JJ., concur.
### Part IV—Inspection, Apprehension, Examination, Exclusion, and Removal
#### 1511.011-77 Final reports.

Contracting Officers shall insert the contract clause at 1552.211-77 when a contract requires both a draft and a final report.
U.S. DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

ATTORNEY APPEARANCE FORM

NOTE: In order to appear before this Court an attorney must either be a member in good

standing of this Court’s general bar or be granted leave to appear pro hac vice as provided for

by Local Rules 83.12 through 83.14.

In the Matter of Case Number:

AN APPEARANCE IS HEREBY FILED BY THE UNDERSIGNED AS ATTORNEY FOR:

NAME (Type or print)

SIGNATURE (Use electronic signature if the appearance form is filed electronically)

 s/

FIRM

STREET ADDRESS

CITY/STATE/ZIP

ID NUMBER (SEE ITEM 3 IN INSTRUCTIONS) TELEPHONE NUMBER

ARE YOU ACTING AS LEAD COUNSEL IN THIS CASE? YES NO 

ARE YOU ACTING AS LOCAL COUNSEL IN THIS CASE? YES NO 

ARE YOU A MEMBER OF THIS COURT’S TRIAL BAR? YES NO 

IF THIS CASE REACHES TRIAL, WILL YOU ACT AS THE TRIAL ATTORNEY? YES NO 

IF THIS IS A CRIMINAL CASE, CHECK THE BOX BELOW THAT DESCRIBES YOUR STATUS.

RETAINED COUNSEL APPOINTED COUNSEL 

Case: 1:12-cv-00743 Document #: 2 Filed: 02/02/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:10
### §1182d. Denial of visas to confiscators of American property

#### (a) Denial of visas

Except as otherwise provided in section 6091 of title 22, and subject to subsection (b), the Secretary of State may deny the issuance of a visa to any alien who—

(1) through the abuse of position, including a governmental or political party position, converts or has converted for personal gain real property that has been confiscated or expropriated, a claim to which is owned by a national of the United States, or who is complicit in such a conversion; or

(2) induces any of the actions or omissions described in paragraph (1) by any person.

#### (b) Exceptions

Subsection (a) shall not apply to—

(1) any country established by international mandate through the United Nations; or

(2) any territory recognized by the United States Government to be in dispute.

#### (c) Reporting requirement

Not later than 6 months after October 21, 1998, and every 12 months thereafter, the Secretary of State shall submit to the Speaker of the House of Representatives and to the chairman of the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate a report, including—

(1) a list of aliens who have been denied a visa under this subsection; and

(2) a list of aliens who could have been denied a visa under subsection (a) but were issued a visa and an explanation as to why each such visa was issued.

(Pub. L. 105–277, div. G, subdiv. B, title XXII, §2225, Oct. 21, 1998, 112 Stat. 2681–819.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Foreign Relations Authorization Act, Fiscal Years 1998 and 1999, and also as part of the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998, and the Omnibus Consolidated and Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Act, 1999, and not as part of the Immigration and Nationality Act which comprises this chapter.
#### 1346.705 Limitations.

Warranties in cost reimbursement contracts are authorized.
1532.805-70 Forms. ( a ) EPA Form 1900-3, Assignee's Release, at 1553.232-70 is required to be submitted by the assignee for cost-reimbursement contracts prior to final payment under the contract.
( b ) EPA Form 1900-4, Assignee's Assignment of Refunds, Rebates, Credits, and Other Amounts, at 1553.232-71 must accompany the assignee's release prior to final payment under cost-reimbursement contracts.
( c ) EPA Form 1900-5, Contractor's Assignment of Refunds, Rebates and Credits, at 1553.232-72 must be prepared by the Contractor prior to final payment under cost-reimbursement contracts and must accompany the Contractor's Release.
( d ) EPA Form 1900-6, Contractor's Release, at 1553.232-73 must be submitted by the Contractor prior to final payment under cost-reimbursement contracts.
#### 1301.403 Individual deviations.

The designee authorized to approve individual deviations from the FAR is set forth in CAM 1301.70.
# 2013 FOIA Log
§ 776.56 Professional independence of a covered USG attorney. ( a ) Notwithstanding a judge advocate's status as a commissioned officer subject, generally, to the authority of superiors, a judge advocate detailed or assigned to represent an individual member or employee of the DoN is expected to exercise unfettered loyalty and professional independence during the representation consistent with subpart B of this part and remains ultimately responsible for acting in the best interest of the individual client.
( b ) Notwithstanding a civilian USG attorney's status as a Federal employee subject, generally, to the authority of superiors, a civilian USG attorney detailed or assigned to represent an individual member or employee of the DoN is expected to exercise unfettered loyalty and professional independence during the representation consistent with this part and remains ultimately responsible for acting in the best interest of the individual client.
( c ) The exercise of professional judgment in accordance with paragraph (a) or (b) of this section shall not, standing alone, be a basis for an adverse evaluation or other prejudicial action. ( 1 ) Subpart B of this part recognizes that a judge advocate is a military officer required by law to obey the lawful orders of superior officers. It also recognizes the similar status of a civilian USG attorney. Nevertheless, the practice of law requires the exercise of judgment solely for the benefit of the client and free of compromising influences and loyalties. Thus, when a covered USG attorney is assigned to represent an individual client, neither the attorney's personal interests, the interests of other clients, nor the interests of third persons should affect loyalty to the individual client.
( 2 ) Not all direction given to a subordinate covered attorney is an attempt to influence improperly the covered attorney's professional judgment. Each situation must be evaluated by the facts and circumstances, giving due consideration to the subordinate's training, experience, and skill. A covered attorney subjected to outside pressures should make full disclosure of them to the client. If the covered attorney or the client believes the effectiveness of the representation has been or will be impaired thereby, the covered attorney should take proper steps to withdraw from representation of the client.
( 3 ) Additionally, a judge advocate has a responsibility to report any instances of unlawful command influence. See R.C.M. 104, MCM, 1998.
#### 1419.803 [Reserved]
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          50,223
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,232,001
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,730,294
<PP&E>                                     116,506,929
<DEPRECIATION>                              68,431,805
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              52,108,257
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,295,746
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0 
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    12,794,040
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                52,108,257
<SALES>                                      9,622,792
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             9,873,248
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               12,807,920
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            (2,934,672)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             959,731
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (3,894,403)
<INCOME-TAX>                                (1,107,843)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (2,786,560)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (2,786,560)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.22)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.22)
        


</TABLE>
#### Norma Schwam, Respondent, v. Bernard Schwam, Appellant.

Motion by appellant to enlarge time to perfect appeal, pursuant to stipulation of the parties dated November 29, 1960, granted; the appellant to perfect the appeal and be ready to argue or submit it at the February Term, beginning January 30, 1961. The appeal is ordered on the calendar for said term. The record and appellant’s brief must be served and filed on or before January 10, 1961. Beldock, Acting P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Pette, JJ., concur.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsReusable Reentry Satellite (RRS): Configuration trade studyThe overall Reusable Reentry Satellite (RRS) Phase B Study objective is to design a relatively inexpensive satellite to access space for extended periods of time, with eventual recovery of experiments on Earth. The expected principal use for such a system is research on the effects of variable gravity (0-1.5 g) and radiation on small animals, plants, lower life forms, tissue samples, and materials processes. The RRS will be capable of: (1) being launched by a variety of expendable launch vehicles; (2) operating in low earth orbit as a free flying unmanned laboratory; and (3) executing independent atmospheric reentry and soft landing. The RRS will be designed to be refurbished and reused up to three times a year for a period of 10 years. The information provided in this report describes the process involved in the evolution of the RRS overall configuration. This process considered reentry aerodynamics, aerothermodynamics, internal equipment layout, and vehicle mass properties. This report delineates the baseline design decisions that were used to initiate the RRS design effort. As a result, there will be deviations between this report and the RRS Final Report. In those instances, the RRS Final Report shall be considered to be the definitive reference.Document ID19930006615Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateDecember 1, 1990Subject CategorySpacecraft Design, Testing And PerformanceReport/Patent NumberRRS-042NAS 1.26:187772NASA-CR-187772Accession Number93N15804Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS9-18202Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19930006615.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**


**AND
      CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





The
      undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to, and as required by, 18 U.S.C. Section
      1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that
      the Quarterly Report of DCAP Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the
      period ended March 31, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that
      information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
      of
      the Company.











Date:
                May 14, 2006
            /s/
                Barry B. Goldstein
              Barry
                B. Goldstein,
              Chief
                Executive Officer and
              Chief
                Financial Officer
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsElectron spin resonance study of thermal instability reactions in jet fuelsFree radicals were studied by electron spin resonance (ESR) using model compounds that are representative of constituents of jet fuels. Radical formation was initiated with peroxides and hydroperoxides by using UV photolysis at and near room temperature and thermal initiation at higher temperatures. Both oxygen free and air saturated systems were studied. N-Dodecane was frequently used as a solvent, and a mixture of n-dodecyl radicals was made with a peroxide initiator in n-dodecane (free of oxygen) thermally at 212 C and photolytically at room temperature. Hydrogen abstraction from the 3,4,5 and 6-positions gives radicals that are sufficiently alike that their spectra are essentially superimposed. The radical formed by abstract of hydrogen from the 2-position gives a different spectrum. ESR parameters for these radicals were measured. The radical formed by abstraction of a primary hydrogen was not observed. Similar radicals are formed from n-decane. A variety of exploratory experiments were carried out with systems that give free radical spectra to which was added small amounts of 2,5-dimethylpyrrole.Document ID19840010350Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsZeldes, H.*(Oak Ridge National Lab. TN, United States)*Livingston, R.*(Oak Ridge National Lab. TN, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 4, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1984Subject CategoryPropellants And FuelsReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.26:168333NASA-CR-168333Accession Number84N18418Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: W-7405-ENG-26PROJECT: RTOP 505-31-42Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19840010350.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
### §7803. Issuance of orders

#### (a) In general

#### (1) Issuance

To effectuate the policy of this chapter specified in section 7801(b) of this title, the Secretary, subject to the procedures provided in subsection (b), shall issue orders under this chapter applicable to producers, importers, and first handlers of Hass avocados.

#### (2) Scope

Any order shall be national in scope.

#### (3) One order

Not more than one order shall be in effect at any one time.

#### (b) Procedures

#### (1) Proposal for an order

An existing organization of avocado producers established pursuant to a State statute, or any other person who will be affected by this chapter, may request the issuance of, and submit a proposal for an order.

#### (2) Publication of proposal

The Secretary shall publish a proposed order and give notice and opportunity for public comment on the proposed order not later than 60 days after receipt by the Secretary of a proposal for an order from an existing organization of avocado producers established pursuant to a State statute, as provided in paragraph (1).

#### (3) Issuance of order

#### (A) In general

After notice and opportunity for public comment are provided in accordance with paragraph (2), the Secretary shall issue the order, taking into consideration the comments received and including in the order such provisions as are necessary to ensure that the order is in conformity with this chapter.

#### (B) Effective date

The order shall be issued and become effective only after an affirmative vote in a referendum as provided in section 7805 of this title, but not later than 180 days after publication of the proposed order.

#### (c) Amendments

The Secretary, from time to time, may amend an order. The provisions of this chapter applicable to an order shall be applicable to any amendment to an order.

(Pub. L. 106–387, §1(a) [title XII, §1204], Oct. 28, 2000, 114 Stat. 1549, 1549A–81.)
#### 18.105 Federal Supply Schedules (FSSs), multi-agency blanket purchase agreements (BPAs), and multi-agency indefinite delivery contracts.

Streamlined procedures and a broad range of goods and services may be available under Federal Supply Schedule contracts (see Subpart 8.4), multi-agency BPAs (*see* 8.405-3(a)(6)), or multi-agency, indefinite-delivery contracts (see 16.505(a)(8)). These contracting methods may offer agency advance planning, pre-negotiated line items, and special terms and conditions that permit rapid response.

[71 FR 38248, July 5, 2006, as amended at 76 FR 14559, Mar. 16, 2011; 77 FR 194, Jan. 3, 2012]
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 8 (Wednesday, January 13, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 2665]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-00512]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural 
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

    Docket Numbers: RP21-371-000.
    Applicants: Cheniere Corpus Christi Pipeline, LP.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: CCPL Housekeeping Filing--FTS 
ROFR Clarification to be effective 2/1/2021.
    Filed Date: 1/5/21.
    Accession Number: 20210105-5034.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/19/21.

    Docket Numbers: RP21-372-000.
    Applicants: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, L.L.C.
    Description: Compliance filing Amended and Restated Cash Management 
Agreement 2020.
    Filed Date: 1/6/21.
    Accession Number: 20210106-5020.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/19/21.

    Docket Numbers: RP21-373-000.
    Applicants: Southern LNG Company, L.L.C.
    Description: Compliance filing Cash Management Agreement.
    Filed Date: 1/6/21.
    Accession Number: 20210106-5022.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/19/21.

    Docket Numbers: RP21-374-000.
    Applicants: Elba Express Company, L.L.C.
    Description: Compliance filing Cash Management Agreement.
    Filed Date: 1/6/21.
    Accession Number: 20210106-5023.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/19/21.

    Docket Numbers: RP21-375-000.
    Applicants: Kinder Morgan Louisiana Pipeline LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing Filing of Amended and Restated Cash 
Management Agreement--RM02-14 et al.
    Filed Date: 1/6/21.
    Accession Number: 20210106-5030.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/19/21.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system 
(https://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/search/fercgensearch.asp) by querying 
the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above 
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00 
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be 
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the 
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing 
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying 
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call (866) 208-3676 
(toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated: January 7, 2021.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-00512 Filed 1-12-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                             109
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   19,540
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,305
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                32,022
<PP&E>                                         985,890
<DEPRECIATION>                                  64,548
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 966,560
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           29,199
<BONDS>                                        421,712
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     86,809
<COMMON>                                       350,751
<OTHER-SE>                                      78,089
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   966,560
<SALES>                                         38,710
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                39,353
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   12,793
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,658
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,687
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,811
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,811
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.33
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.33
        

</TABLE>