alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
16.500 Scope of subpart. ( a ) This subpart prescribes policies and procedures for making awards of indefinite-delivery contracts and establishes a preference for making multiple awards of indefinite-quantity contracts.
( b ) This subpart does not limit the use of other than competitive procedures authorized by part 6.
( c ) Nothing in this subpart restricts the authority of the General Services Administration (GSA) to enter into schedule, multiple award, or task or delivery order contracts under any other provision of law. Therefore, GSA regulations and the coverage for the Federal Supply Schedule program in subpart 8.4 and part 38 take precedence over this subpart.
( d ) The statutory multiple award preference implemented by this subpart does not apply to architect-engineer contracts subject to the procedures in subpart 36.6. However, agencies are not precluded from making multiple awards for architect-engineer services using the procedures in this subpart, provided the selection of contractors and placement of orders are consistent with subpart 36.6.
( e ) See subpart 19.5 for procedures to set aside part or parts of multiple-award contracts for small businesses; to reserve one or more awards for small business on multiple-award contracts; and to set aside orders for small businesses under multiple-award contracts.
[65 FR 24318, Apr. 25, 2000, as amended at 85 FR 11757, Feb. 27, 2020]
1 Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

For the Fifth Circuit

No. 97-40694

KENNETH MICHAEL HULSEY,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

VERSUS

AMERICAN BRANDS INCORPORATED; ET AL 

Defendants, 

BROWN & WILLIAMSON TOBACCO CORP., Individually 

and as Successor by Merger to the American Tobacco Company;

LORILLARD TOBACCO COMPANY; PHILLIP MORRIS INCORPORATED; 

R J REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Southern District of Texas

(C-97-CV-2) 

March 2, 1998

Before REYNALDO G. GARZA, DUHE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:1

Having thoroughly reviewed the record, and the briefs of

counsel, and having had the benefit of spirited argument by counsel

for all parties, we are unable to discern any error committed by

the district court. Accordingly, the judgment of the district
2

court is 

AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                       5
<LEGEND>
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                           0000318299
<NAME>                          Tomahawk Industries, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                                               1
<CURRENCY>                                                        US Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                                APR-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                                   MAY-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                                     APR-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                                            1
<CASH>                                                                     0
<SECURITIES>                                                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                              0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                               0
<INVENTORY>                                                                0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                           0
<PP&E>                                                                     0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                             0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                             0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                  37878
<BONDS>                                                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                      0
<PREFERRED>                                                                0
<COMMON>                                                              166373
<OTHER-SE>                                                           (204251)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                               0
<SALES>                                                                    0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                           0
<CGS>                                                                      0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                           1200
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                           0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                         0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                        (1200)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                               0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                    (1200)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                            0
<CHANGES>                                                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                                                           (1200)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                             0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                           0.00



</TABLE>
September 10, 2015

Mr. Danny Frisby-Griffin

Chief Executive Officer

Saunter Raven, LLC

418 NE 5th Street

Madison, SD 57042

Dear Mr. Frisby-Griffin:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your petition for an exemption from 

§§ 61.113(a) and (b), 61.133(a)(1)(ii), 91.109(a), 91.151(a), 91.119(c), 91.121, 91.405(a), 

91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(2), 91.417(a) and (b) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations 

(14 CFR). It explains why we cannot process your request and what you should do in the next 

30 days.

Why We Cannot Process Your Request

On July 1, 2015, we posted to the public docket your exemption request on behalf of Raven 

Saunter, LLC filed in Docket No. FAA−2015−2676, but we are unable to process your 

request any further. Your petition does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy 

enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

For more detailed information relating to submitting petitions for exemption, please visit 

http://aes.faa.gov/petition/index.html. This website helps the petitioner to meet Federal 

Aviation Administration (FAA) requirement outlines in § 11.81 and helps answer any 

questions you may have.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must submit the requested information 

within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption 

at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. 
2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further. 

If you have any questions you may call the 333 Information Line (202) 267-2999.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and

 Airspace Rules Division

Enclosures
3
4
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 782 

To reauthorize the National Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force 

Program, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 30, 2017 

Mr. CORNYN (for himself, Mr. BLUMENTHAL, Mr. HELLER, and Ms. KLOBUCHAR) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To reauthorize the National Internet Crimes Against 

Children Task Force Program, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Providing Resources, 

5 Officers, and Technology To Eradicate Cyber Threats to 

6 Our Children Act of 2017’’ or the ‘‘PROTECT Our Chil7 dren Act of 2017’’. 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 782 IS

1 SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF THE NATIONAL INTERNET 

2 CRIMES AGAINST CHILDREN TASK FORCE 

3 PROGRAM. 

4 Title I of the PROTECT Our Children Act of 2008 

5 (42 U.S.C. 17601 et seq.) is amended— 

6 (1) in section 105(h) (42 U.S.C. 17615(h)), by 

7 striking ‘‘2016’’ and inserting ‘‘2022’’; and 

8 (2) in section 107(a)(10) (42 U.S.C. 

9 17617(a)(10)), by striking ‘‘fiscal year 2018’’ and 

10 inserting ‘‘each of fiscal years 2018 through 2022’’. 

Æ 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1





Certification of CEO and CFO

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002







In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Angeles Partners X (the "Partnership"), for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Martha L. Long, as the equivalent of the chief executive officer of the Partnership, and Stephen B. Waters, as the equivalent of the chief financial officer of the Partnership, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.



| |                        
| | -----------------------
| | /s/Martha L. Long      
| | Name: Martha L. Long   
| | Date: March 25, 2008   
| |                        
| | /s/Stephen B. Waters   
| | Name: Stephen B. Waters
| | Date: March 25, 2008   



This certification is furnished with this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Partnership for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
# United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 23-1503

___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee

v. Calvertson Johnson Slim lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant

____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Springfield

____________ Submitted: January 30, 2024 Filed: February 7, 2024 [Unpublished]

____________ Before BENTON, KELLY, and STRAS, Circuit Judges.

____________ PER CURIAM. Calvertson Slim, who was civilly committed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 4246 in 2019, appeals the district court’s 1 order revoking his grant of conditional release

1 The Honorable M. Douglas Harpool, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri, adopting the report and recommendations of theunder section 4246(f). After careful review of the record and the parties’ arguments

on appeal, we conclude that the district court did not clearly err in finding that Slim failed to comply with his prescribed regimen of care and that his continued release would therefore create a substantial risk of bodily injury to another person or serious damage to property of another. See 18 U.S.C. § 4246(f); United States v. Burleson, 29 Fed. App’x 412, 413 (8th Cir. 2002) (unpublished per curiam) (standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

Honorable David P. Rush, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Missouri. -2-
§ 552.121 Possession or retention of prohibited weapons. Prohibited weapons are defined as: ( a ) Any instrument or weapon of the kind usually known as a sling shot, sand club, metal knuckles, spring blade knife, or any knife from which the blade is automatically released by a spring mechanism or other mechanism or other mechanical device, or any knife having a blade which opens, falls, or is effected into position by force of gravity or an outward thrust or centrifugal movement, or any knife with a blade with a length in excess of three inches. This does not include knives designed for and used during hunting and fishing activities. However, such knives may only be carried while participating in those activities. The possession of knives kept in quarters and designed for the use in the preparation of food is authorized.
( b ) Any incendiary devices, military ammunition and/or explosives.
( c ) Any weapons not legally obtained.
( d ) Any instrument commonly used in the practice of martial arts, for example, a nunchaku, except during the legitimate martial arts training. If martial arts use is authorized, storage of these instruments during nontraining periods will be in a location other than the arms room, as designed by the unit commander for soldiers residing in troop billets, BEQ or BOQ. Martial arts instruments may be stored in assigned government family quarters during nontraining periods.
( e ) Any weapons on which the name of the manufacturer, serial number of identification have been changed, altered, removed or obliterated unless done for legitimate repair or part replacement.
Case: 1:12-cv-01018 Document #: 100 Filed: 02/03/15 Page 1 of 4 PageID #:905
Case: 1:12-cv-01018 Document #: 100 Filed: 02/03/15 Page 2 of 4 PageID #:906
Case: 1:12-cv-01018 Document #: 100 Filed: 02/03/15 Page 3 of 4 PageID #:907
Case: 1:12-cv-01018 Document #: 100 Filed: 02/03/15 Page 4 of 4 PageID #:908
Order entered February 4, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-00118-CR

ANTONIO LAMAR COCHRAN, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 1

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F15-76529-H

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s January 31, 2019 third motion for extension of time to file 

appellant’s brief. We GRANT the motion and ORDER appellant’s brief filed on or before 

February 15, 2019. If appellant’s brief is not filed by February 15, 2019, this appeal may be 

abated for the trial court to make findings in accordance with rule of appellate procedure 38.8.

/s/ BILL PEDERSEN, III 

JUSTICE
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 06914

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2

File Name Description

x 06914\06914_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

06914\06914_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

06914\06914_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 06914\06914_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 06914\06914_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 06914\06914_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 06914\06914_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 06914\06914_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file

06914\Certification Statement Plant ID 06914.pdf Plant certification statement

x 06914\Supplemental Documents\06914_Charles R Lowman Plant Map -1(CONFIDENTIAL) R.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

06914\Supplemental Documents\06914_Cover Letter.pdf Cover letter

x 06914\Supplemental Documents\06914_Extension Request.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 06914\Supplemental Documents\06914_Lowman Water Balance.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF CHASE GENERAL CORPORATION CONTAINED IN ITS QUARTERLY
REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         129,351
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  257,498
<ALLOWANCES>                                    14,447
<INVENTORY>                                    399,145
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               780,603
<PP&E>                                         949,567
<DEPRECIATION>                                 692,427
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,037,743
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          294,026
<BONDS>                                        242,980
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  2,361,440
<COMMON>                                       969,834
<OTHER-SE>                                 (2,830,537)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,037,743
<SALES>                                        532,263
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               533,109
<CGS>                                          400,395
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   95,046
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,605
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,790
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 32,273
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,435
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             25,838
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    25,838
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
AAM

- 1 3

- 3 75

- E June 06, 2013

Exemption No. 1079 0

Regulatory Docket No. FAA

- 20 1 3

- 0 438

Ms. Ann Moseley Rychlik

Drug Program Manager

American Helicopters, Inc.

10503 Wakeman Drive

Manassas, Vir ginia 20110

Dear M s

. Rychlik :

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our

decision, explains its basis, and gives you the conditions and limitations of the exemption,

including the date it ends.

The B asis for Our Decision

By letter dated April 2 2 , 2013 , you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on

behalf of American Helicopters , Inc. (American Helicopters) for an exemption from part 120

of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) t o the extent necessary to allow American

Helicopters to cover its safety

- sensitive employees under one drug and alcohol testing

program

.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition

in the Federal Register bec ause the requested exemption would not set a precedent, and any

delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to American Helicopters

.

The FAA has issued a grant of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to

those presented in your petition. In Grant of Exemption No. 9703 (copy enclosed), the FAA

found that Solid Edge’s § 91.147 air tour operations were closely connected to its part 135

operations. The FAA also found that combining the petitioner’s two drug and alcohol testing

programs into one would be in the public interest and would maintain an equivalent level of2

safety to that provided by the current regulations. Thus, the FAA concluded it was

unnecessary to burden the petitioner by requiring it to conduct two separate tes ting programs.

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that

—

• they are similar in all material respects to relief previously requested in the enclosed Grant

of Exemption No. 9703 ;

• the reasons stated by the FAA for granting the encl osed Grant of Exemption No. 9703 also

apply to the situation you present; and

• a grant of exemption is in the public interest.

Our Decision

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator

has delegated to me, I here by grant American Helicopters , Inc

. an exemption from

14 CFR part 120 to the extent necessary to allow American Helicopters to cover its safety

sensitive employees under one drug and alcohol testing program , subj ect to the conditions and

limitations descri bed below.

Conditions and Limitations

1. Employees of American Helicopters are subject to the drug and alcohol regulations

at all times while conducting operations under part 135 or part 91.

2. The drug and alcohol program must be implemented under the same a uspices of

the American Helicopters part 135 operation, not under part 91.

This exemption terminates on June 30 , 201 5 , unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

James R. Fraser, M.D.

Deputy Federal Air Surgeon

Enclosure
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S 1ST QUARTER 10-Q 1997.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          14,983
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   33,355
<ALLOWANCES>                                       953
<INVENTORY>                                     26,848
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                84,161
<PP&E>                                          25,593
<DEPRECIATION>                                  13,779
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 113,264
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           29,477
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           132
<OTHER-SE>                                      83,655
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   113,264
<SALES>                                         28,120
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                32,314
<CGS>                                           16,634
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   19,617
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 9,571
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 (270)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   3
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,378
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,077
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,301
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,301
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .19<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .18
<FN>
<F1> For Purposes of This Exhibit, Primary means Basic.
</FN>


</TABLE>
#### 1615.407-1 Rate reduction for defective pricing or defective cost or pricing data.

The clause set forth in section 1652.215-70 will be inserted in FEHB Program contracts, at or above the threshold in FAR 15.403-4(a)(1), that are based on a combination of cost and price analysis (community-rated).