alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of the Claim of George Svolos, Respondent, v. Flatbush Plaza Restaurant et al., Appellants. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.

The employer and its carrier appeal from a decision and award of the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Claimant was long employed as a waiter whose routine work required the lifting and carrying of laden trays weighing about 30 pounds. The board’s finding is that his employment activities resulted in a bilateral inguinal hernia. The medical evidence is in agreement that claimant’s occupation could produce the hernial condition. The board was not required because of evidence of a specific inceptive incident to classify claimant’s condition as an accidental injury as appellants contend but could draw the contrary inference from the proof that the disease was one recognizably linked to the strains of waitering generally and hence occupational in origin. *(Matter of Makowski*v. *Darling & Co.,*18 A D 2d 1120, mot. for Iv. to app. den. 13 N Y 2d 594; *Matter of Silverman*v. *Little West Mfg. Co.,*20 A D 2d 612.) There is ample evidence supportive of the determination. Decision affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Herlihy, J. P., Reynolds, Taylor, Aulisi and Hamm, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>


                                                                      EXHIBIT 32


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Environmental Tectonics
Corporation (the "Company") for the fiscal quarter ended November 28, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, William F. Mitchell, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1)       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                    13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2)       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                    all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                    operations of the Company.


                                 /s/ William F. Mitchell
                                 ----------------------------
                                 William F. Mitchell
                                 Chief Executive Officer


                                 /s/ Duane D. Deaner
                                 ----------------------------
                                 Duane D. Deaner
                                 Chief Financial Officer

                                January 12, 2004


         This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed to be filed by the Company for purpose
of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit 23.1**

  

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLICACCOUNTING FIRM

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by referencein the Registration Statement on Form S-8 dated March 6, 2009 (Registration No. 333-157748) of Global Health Voyager, Inc.(formerly known as NT Media Corp. of California Inc.) of our report dated April 15, 2011 relating to the financial statements whichappear in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2010.

 

Goldman Kurland and Mohidin, LLP

Encino, California

October 19, 2011
#### 1832.501 General.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT FOR PURPOSES OF THE "SAFE HARBOR" PROVISIONS OF THE PRIVATE
SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF 1995

The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides a "safe harbor"
for forward-looking statements to encourage companies to provide prospective
information about their companies without fear of litigation so long as those
statements are identified as forward-looking and are accompanied by meaningful
cautionary statements identifying important factors that could cause actual
results to differ materially from those projected in the statement. The Company
desires to take advantage of the "safe harbor" provisions of the Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 in connection with forward-looking
statements contained in this report.  Accordingly, the Company hereby
identifies the following important factors which could cause the Company's
financial results to differ materially from any such results which might be
projected, forecast, estimated or budgeted by the Company in forward-looking
statements.

                  (a) Heightened competition, including specifically the
         intensification of price competition; the entry of new competitors; and
         the expansion, renovation and opening of new stores by new and existing
         competitors.

                  (b) Failure to obtain new customers or retain existing
         customers.

                  (c) Inability to carry out marketing, sales and capital plans.

                  (d) Insufficiency of financial resources to renovate and
         expand store base.

                  (e) Prolonged dispute with labor.

                  (f) Economic downturn in the Southeast region.

                  (g) Loss or retirement of key executives.

                  (h) Higher selling, general and administrative expenses
         occasioned by the need for additional advertising, marketing,
         administrative, or management information systems expenditures.

                  (i) Adverse publicity and news coverage.

The foregoing review of factors pursuant to the Private Litigation Securities
Reform Act of 1995 should not be construed as exhaustive or as any admission
regarding the adequacy of disclosures made by the Company prior to this filing.
16.402-3 Delivery incentives. ( a ) Delivery incentives should be considered when improvement from a required delivery schedule is a significant Government objective. It is important to determine the Government's primary objectives in a given contract (e.g., earliest possible delivery or earliest quantity production).
( b ) Incentive arrangements on delivery should specify the application of the reward-penalty structure in the event of Government-caused delays or other delays beyond the control, and without the fault or negligence, of the contractor or subcontractor.
# dlqtrly

# dlcumul

# NEW SUB

# UNSUB

# PLUS

# TOTAL

# SUM - DL & FFEL

# dl title page

# DL NOTE

# fy97numbers

# Sheet13

# Sheet14

# Sheet15

# Sheet16
EXHIBIT
      23.2












**Consent
      of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**








We
      have
      issued our report dated April 25, 2006, accompanying the consolidated financial
      statements included in the Annual Report of Access Pharmaceuticals, Inc. on
      Form
      10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2006. We hereby consent to the
      incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statements of
      Access Pharmaceuticals, Inc. on Form S-1 (File Nos. 333-125349 and 333-135734),
      Form S-3 (File Nos. 333-92210, 333-39330, 333-37786, 333-52030,
      333-95413, 333-64904 and 333-113909) and on Form S-8 (File
      Nos. 333-45646 333-75136, 333-125796 and 333-114269).










/s/
      Grant
      Thornton LLP





Dallas,
      Texas


March
      30,
      2007
#### 1509.403 Definitions.

The “Debarring Official” and the “Suspending Official” as defined in FAR 9.403 is a designated individual located in the Office of Grants and Debarment. This Agency official is authorized to make the determinations and provide the notifications required under FAR subpart 9.4 or this subpart, except for the determinations required by FAR 9.405-1(a) which are to be made by the Head of the Contracting Activity. All compelling reason determinations to be made by the Debarring or Suspending Official under FAR subpart 9.4 or this subpart will be made only after coordination and consultation with the Head of the Contracting Activity. See also 2 CFR part 1532.

[65 FR 37291, June 14, 2000, as amended at 72 FR 2427, Jan. 19, 2007]
EXHIBIT 32.2
  **CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**
 **19 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
  In connection with the Annual Report of Statmon Technologies Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Geoffrey Talbot, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:
  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 **/s/ **Geoffrey P. Talbot****
 **Geoffrey P. Talbot**
 **Chief Financial Officer**
 **September 13, 2004**
  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Statmon Technologies Corp. and will be retained by Statmon Technologies Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Less than 

17% Pell

Between 17% 

and less than 

28.5% Pell

Between 28.5% 

and less than 

49.1% Pell

More than 

49.1% Pell

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Failure Rate

Percent of Pell Recipients 

(Quartiles)

Repayment Rate Failure, Two-Year Colleges

17.1%

22.9%

27.6%

60.3%
Less than 

18.6% Pell

Between 18.6% 

and less than 

26% Pell

Between 26%

and less than 

36.2% Pell

More than 

36.2% Pell

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Failure Rate

Percent of Pell Recipients 

(Quartiles)

Repayment Rate Failure, Four-Year Colleges

1.5% 1.9%

4.3%

41.1%
Less than 

3% Black or 

African 

American

Between 3% and 

less than 8% 

Black or African 

American

Between 8%

and less than 

14% Black or 

African American

More than 

14% Black or 

African 

American

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Failure Rate

Percent of Pell Recipients by Race 

(Quartiles)

Repayment Rate Failure, Four-Year Colleges, by Race

3.4% 1.8%

4.0%

37.0%
Less than 

3% Black or 

African 

American

Between 3% and 

less than 8% Black 

or African 

American

Between 8%

and less than 

21% Black or 

African American

More than 

21% Black or 

African 

American

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Failure Rate

Percent of Pell Recipients by Race 

(Quartiles)

Repayment Rate Failure, Two-Year Colleges, by Race

15.8%

22.0%

34.0%

68.5%
#### 1852.236-74 Magnitude of requirement.

As prescribed in 1836.570(d), insert the following provision:

# Magnitude of Requirement (DEC 1988)

The Government estimated price range of this project is between $________ and $________. [Insert the estimated dollar range.]

(End of provision)

[54 FR 28340, July 5, 1989, as amended at 62 FR 4476, Jan. 30, 1997]
Exhibit
      23(c)











Consent
      of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm








We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in PPL Electric Utilities
      Corporation’s Registration Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-132574,
      333-132574-01, 333-132574-02, and 333-132574-03) of our report dated February
      26, 2007, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule
      of
      PPL Electric Utilities Corporation, included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K)
      for the year ended December 31, 2006.


/s/
        Ernst
& Young LLP
 Philadelphia,
        Pennsylvania
 February
        26, 2007
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Larry E. Finger, the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Federal Realty Investment Trust (the Company), has executed this certification in connection with the filing with the Securities and
Exchange Commission of the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2007 (the Report). The undersigned hereby certifies that:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                 |  |  |  |                                                                                                     
|---------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|October 31, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/ LARRY E. FINGER                                                                                 
|                 |  |  |  | Larry E. Finger, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting
Officer)
#### 2001.104 Issuance.
1426.7101 Definitions. For purposes of this subpart the following definitions shall apply: *Contract* means a contract or subcontract awarded pursuant to the FAR, as well as federal financial assistance, including a subcontract, cooperative agreement, grant, subagreement or subgrant.
*Minority business enterprise* means a business which is at least 51% owned by one or more minority individuals, or in the case of any publicly owned business, at least 51% of the voting stock is owned by one or more minority individuals. The daily business operations are likewise managed by the minority owner.
*Minority individual* means a U.S. citizen who has been subjected to racial or ethnic prejudice or cultural bias because of their identity as members of this group without regard to their individual qualities. Such groups include, but are not limited to: Black Americans; Hispanic Americans; Native Americans; Asian-Pacific Americans; and other groups whose members are U.S. citizens and are found to be disadvantaged by the Small Business Administration pursuant to Section 8(d) of the Small Business Act as amended (15 U.S.C. 637(d)), or the Secretary of Commerce. ( a ) *Native Americans* are persons having origins in any of the original peoples of North America or the Hawaiian Islands; in particular, American Indians, Eskimos, Aleuts and Native Hawaiians.
( b ) *Asian-Pacific Americans* —persons having origins from Japan, China, the Philippines, Vietnam, Korea, Samoa, Guam, the U.S. Trust Territories of the Pacific, Northern Marianas, Laos, Cambodia, Taiwan, Thailand, Malaysia, Indonesia, Singapore, Brunei, Republic of the Marshall Islands, or the Federated States of Micronesia.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Synthetic Blood International, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended October 31, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert W. Nicora, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                  |  |  |  |                                      
|----------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------
|                  |  | 
|December 14, 2005 |  |  |  | /s/ Robert W. Nicora                 
|                  |  |  |  | President and Chief Executive Officer



CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Synthetic Blood International, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended October 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David H. Johnson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                  |  |  |  |                        
|----------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|                  |  | 
|December 14, 2005 |  |  |  | /s/ David H. Johnson   
|                  |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Synthetic Blood International, Inc. and will be retained by Synthetic Blood International, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# Public School Choice

Title I, section 1116(b)(E)

· **What schools must offer choice ?**

Beginning with the 2002-2003 school year, schools in the following categories must offer public school choice to their students.

1. Schools that are in their first year of school improvement.

2. Schools that are in the second year of school improvement.

3. Schools that are in corrective action.

4. Schools that are in the planning year for restructuring.

· **What schools can accept transferring students?**

Students may not transfer to any schools: (1) that have been identified for improvement, corrective action, or the planning year of restructuring; or (2) that have been identified by the State as persistently dangerous.  (Note:  States are currently in the process of identifying schools that are persistently dangerous.  All States will have completed this process by July 1, 2003.  For more information on this issue, go to:  For more information on this issue, go to: http://www.ed.gov/policy/elsec/guid/unsafeschoolchoice.doc.)

*[Note:  The policy stated here is included as a draft regulatory policy.  Please see the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking dated August 6, 2002.]*

· **What students are eligible for the choice option?**

All**students enrolled in Title I schools identified for school improvement, corrective action, or the planning year of restructuring are eligible to transfer to another public school, including a public charter school, that is not in school improvement.  

· **How long can a child attend the public school of his/her choice?**

If an eligible student exercises the option to transfer to another public school, an LEA must permit the student to remain in that school until he or she has completed the highest grade in the school.  However, the LEA is no longer obligated to provide transportation for the student after the end of the school year in which the student’s school of origin is no longer identified for school improvement, corrective action, or in the planning year of restructuring. 

# For more information

The guidance document for public school choice will be available in October at:

http://www.ed.gov/policy/elsec/guid/schoolchoiceguid.doc

http://www.ed.gov/policy/elsec/guid/schoolchoiceguid.pdf
#### 1601.104 Issuance.
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

No. 22

- 30109 Summary Calendar

**United States of America,**

Plaintiff

— Appellee **,**

versus

**Michael Ford,**

Defendant

— Appellant

**.**

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana USDC No. 3:21

- CR

- 16

- 1

Before **Higginbotham, Graves,**  and **Ho,** Circuit Judges

**. Per Curiam**  **:** *

The attorney appointed to represent Michael Ford has moved for
leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).
Ford has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the

* Pursuant to **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED August 29, 2022

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 22-30109 Document: 00516451475 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/29/2022No. 22

- 30109

2 relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
**GRANTED** , counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and
the **APPEAL IS DISMISSED**

. See **5th Cir. R.** 42.2

. Case: 22-30109 Document: 00516451475 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/29/2022
<PAGE>
                                              Exhibit 10(p)




        Executive Compensation Incentive Award Program


	The Company's Executive Compensation Incentive Award 
Program is designed to promote the success of the Company by 
providing a method whereby officers and key employees of the 
Company and its subsidiaries may be awarded additional 
remuneration based on specific Company objectives and the 
Company's overall return on equity.  The program has two 
separate components.  A short-term incentive plan makes cash 
awards to eligible employees based on the achievement of 
independent financial, operational and strategic goals 
established annually by the Compensation and Corporate 
Governance Committee of the Company's Board of Directors, as 
well as individual goals for officers who are not members of 
the Company's Corporate Leadership Council (CLC).  A long-term 
incentive plan grants restricted Company stock to eligible 
employees based on the achievement of other goals established 
by the Committee.
	Awards under the program are made by the Committee of 
the Board of Directors, except that cash awards are made by CLC 
in the case of non-CLC members.