alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                              Exhibit 11

                       ANCHOR PACIFIC UNDERWRITERS, INC.

                       COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON

                          AND COMMON SHARE EQUIVALENT

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                               Years Ended December 31,
                                           -----------------------------------
                                              1999         1998        1997
                                           -----------  ----------  ----------
<S>                                        <C>          <C>         <C>
Basic:
 Weighted average number of common shares
  outstanding.............................   4,710,056   4,708,580   4,612,153
                                           ===========  ==========  ==========
 Net loss................................. $(2,477,971) $ (775,330) $ (946,691)
                                           ===========  ==========  ==========
 Per share amount......................... $     (0.53) $    (0.16) $    (0.21)
                                           ===========  ==========  ==========
Diluted:
 Weighted average number of common shares
  outstanding.............................   4,710,056   4,708,580   4,612,153
 Net effect of stock options and
  warrants................................         --          --          --
 Net effect of convertible debentures
  outstanding end of period...............     779,750     444,444     444,444
                                           -----------  ----------  ----------
   Total..................................   5,489,806   5,153,024   5,056,597
                                           ===========  ==========  ==========
Net loss.................................. $(2,477,971) $ (775,330) $ (946,691)
Interest on convertible debt..............      44,970       7,666       6,000
                                           -----------  ----------  ----------
Net Income, after deducting interest on
 debentures............................... $(2,433,001) $ (767,664) $ (940,691)
                                           ===========  ==========  ==========
 Per share amount......................... $     (0.44) $    (0.15) $    (0.19)
                                           ===========  ==========  ==========
</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.3
 Certificate Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ Maria R. SchekerName:
    
    Maria R. SchekerTitle:
    
    Chief Accounting OfficerDate:
    
    March 31, 2009
#### 1452.236-71 Additive or Deductive Items.

As prescribed in 1436.571, insert the following provision:

# Additive or Deductive Items—Department of the Interior (JUL 1996)

So that the Government may obtain the most desirable features of work within the limit of its funds available at time of bid evaluation, award may be made to the bidder having the lowest total of the base bid and a combination of additive and deductive items. All bids shall be evaluated on the basis of the same additive and deductive bid items using the order of priority of the items listed in the schedule.

(End of provision)
EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                FEDERAL MORTGAGE CORPORATION OF PUERTO RICO, INC.
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Federal Mortgage Corporation of
Puerto Rico, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September
30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, Peter Porath, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Peter Porath
Peter Porath

President, Chief Executive Officer
November 9, 2005
# Hospital Quality Initiative    

## Pages in this section**

    -  Quality initiatives 
      -  Hospital Quality Initiative  -  Inpatient Psychiatric Facility Quality Reporting (IPFQR) Program 
-  Hospital Outpatient Quality Reporting Program 
-  Hospital Care Compare 
-  Outcome and Payment Measures 
-  HCAHPS: Patients' Perspectives of Care Survey 
-  Medicare Payment and Volume Information for Consumers 
-  Measure Methodology 
-  Hospital Value-Based Purchasing 
-  PPS-Exempt Cancer Hospital Quality Reporting (PCHQR) Program 
-  Health Insurance Marketplace Quality Initiatives 
-  Highlights 
-  Hospital Archives 
-  Hospital Inpatient Quality Reporting Program 
-  Inpatient Measures 
-  Measures System Overview 
-  Person and Family Engagement 
-  Premier Hospital Historical Data 
-  Premier Hospital Quality Incentive Demonstration 
 
      -  ASC Quality Reporting 
      -  PAC Quality Initiatives

Hospital Quality Initiative

**Now available! Our new ****Provider Data Catalog****makes it easier for you to search & download our publicly reported data. We’ve also improved ****Medicare’s compare sites****.**

The intent of the Hospital Quality Initiative (HQI) is to improve the quality of care that hospitals provide and to distribute clearly defined and objective data about hospital performance. This encourages consumers to discuss and make more informed decisions on how to obtain the best hospital care, provides incentives for hospitals to improve care, and emphasizes public accountability. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) uses a variety of tools to encourage improvements in the quality of care delivered by hospitals.

These tools include:
                                          - Regulating and enforcing standards set by  State survey agencies  and CMS.
                                          - Displaying hospital quality information on Web sites for consumers, including   Care Compare on Medicare.gov  and the  Provider Data Catalog .
                                          - Testing rewards for superior performance on certain  quality measures .
                                          - Using continual, community-based quality improvement resources through the  Quality Improvement Organizations .
                                          - Developing collaborative partnerships to leverage knowledge and resources.

For additional information, see the Related Links below.

## **Related Links

                                        - CMS Quality Programs
                                        - Quality Measures
                                        - Care Compare on Medicare.gov
                                        - Provider Data Catalog
                                        - QualityNet
                                        - Medicare.gov
                                        - Quality Improvement Organizations
                                        - Quality Initiatives - General Information
                                        - Special Open Door Forums

Help with File Formats and Plug-Ins
#### GUARANTY TRUST CO. OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JENNINGS, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

October 23, 1903.)

Action by the Guaranty Trust Company of New York against Louis B. Jennings.

No opinion. Motion to open default granted, upon payment of $10 costs and $10 costs of the term, so far as to allow appellant to submit points within 10 days from entry of order on this decision, if respondent consents to submit; otherwise, on payment of above costs, default will be opened, and case put on November calendar, to be argued when reached.
#### 1436.602-3 Evaluation board functions.

The selection report shall be prepared for HCA approval, in accordance with bureau/office procedures.
#### 1316.601 Time-and-materials contracts.

The designee authorized to approve a time-and-materials contract prior to the execution of the base period when the base period plus any option periods exceeds three years is set forth in CAM 1301.70.
### §940g. Electric loans for renewable energy

#### (a) Definition of renewable energy source

In this section, the term "renewable energy source" means an energy conversion system fueled from a solar, wind, hydropower, biomass, or geothermal source of energy.

#### (b) Loans

In addition to any other funds or authorities otherwise made available under this chapter, the Secretary may make electric loans under this subchapter for electric generation from renewable energy resources for resale to rural and nonrural residents.

#### (c) Rate

The rate of a loan under this section shall be equal to the average tax-exempt municipal bond rate of similar maturities.

(May 20, 1936, ch. 432, title III, §317, as added Pub. L. 110–234, title VI, §6108, May 22, 2008, 122 Stat. 1198, and Pub. L. 110–246, §4(a), title VI, §6108, June 18, 2008, 122 Stat. 1664, 1959.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Pub. L. 110–234 and Pub. L. 110–246 enacted identical sections. Pub. L. 110–234 was repealed by section 4(a) of Pub. L. 110–246.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Enactment of this section and repeal of Pub. L. 110–234 by Pub. L. 110–246 effective May 22, 2008, the date of enactment of Pub. L. 110–234, see section 4 of Pub. L. 110–246, set out as a note under section 8701 of this title.
Case: 1:12-cv-00164 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 01/10/12 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:7

Case: 1:12-cv-00164 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 01/10/12 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:8

Case: 1:12-cv-00164 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 01/10/12 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:9
#### In the Matter of City of New York, Relative to Acquiring Title to Real Property Acquired for Park Row Slum Clearance Project.

Motion to clarify the decision and remittitur of this court denied. There is no necessity for such relief shown. The granting of the new trial should be construed to require a new trial generally. *(Matter of Sipal Realty Corp.*v. *William,*15 A D 2d 456.) Hence, upon the new trial any relevant and competent evidence tending to establish the fair market value of the claimants’ parking lots would be admissible. Only after all of the evidence is in will the trial court be in a position to determine whether the principles of either *Matter of City of New York (Park Row Slum Clearance Project)*(17 A D 2d 534) or *Matter of City of New York (Fairfield Trust)*(19 A D 2d 44) are to control the evaluation in the instant ease. Concur — Botein, P. J., Valente, McNally, Eager and Steuer, JJ.
### §671. Arbitration of disputes concerning milk

#### (a) Application

The Secretary of Agriculture, or such officer or employee of the Department of Agriculture as may be designated by him, upon written application of any cooperative association, incorporated or otherwise, which is in good faith owned or controlled by producers or organizations thereof, of milk or its products, and which is bona fide engaged in collective processing or preparing for market or handling or marketing (in the current of interstate or foreign commerce, as defined by section 610(j) of this title), milk or its products, may mediate and, with the consent of all parties, shall arbitrate if the Secretary has reason to believe that the declared policy of the Agricultural Adjustment Act [7 U.S.C. 601 et seq.], as amended, would be effectuated thereby, bona fide disputes, between such associations and the purchasers or handlers or processors or distributors of milk or its products, as to terms and conditions of the sale of milk or its products. The power to arbitrate under this section shall apply only to such subjects of the term or condition in dispute as could be regulated under the provisions of the Agricultural Adjustment Act, as amended, relating to orders for milk and its products.

#### (b) Conduct of meetings

Meetings held pursuant to this section shall be conducted subject to such rules and regulations as the Secretary may prescribe.

#### (c) Approval of award

No award or agreement resulting from any such arbitration or mediation shall be effective unless and until approved by the Secretary of Agriculture, or such officer or employee of the Department of Agriculture as may be designated by him, and shall not be approved if it permits any unlawful trade practice or any unfair method of competition.

#### (d) Exemption from antitrust laws

No meeting so held and no award or agreement so approved shall be deemed to be in violation of any of the antitrust laws of the United States.

(June 3, 1937, ch. 296, §3, 50 Stat. 248.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Agricultural Adjustment Act, referred to in subsec. (a), is title I of act May 12, 1933, ch. 25, 48 Stat. 31, as amended, which is classified generally to chapter 26 (§601 et seq.) of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 601 of this title and Tables.
###### Editorial Note on Part 842

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 842 appear at 81 FR 83688, Nov. 22, 2016.

#### § 842.45 Scope of this subpart.

This subpart tells how to settle and pay claims against the United States presented by inhabitants of foreign countries for property damage, personal injury, or death caused by military and civilian members of the U.S. Armed Forces in foreign countries.

[55 FR 2809, Jan. 29, 1990. Redesignated at 81 FR 83692, Nov. 22, 2016]
### §64. Appropriation for expenses; appointment by Secretary of officers and agents; compensation

There are authorized to be appropriated out of any moneys in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, such sums as may be necessary for carrying out the provisions of this chapter; and the Secretary of Agriculture is authorized, within the limits of such appropriations, to appoint, remove, and fix the compensations of such officers and employees, not in conflict with existing law, and make such expenditures for rent outside the District of Columbia, printing, telegrams, telephones, law books, books of reference, periodicals, furniture, stationery, office equipment, travel, and other supplies and expenses as shall be necessary to the administration of this chapter in the District of Columbia and elsewhere.

(Mar. 4, 1923, ch. 288, §12, 42 Stat. 1519.)
### §918b. Acquisition of existing systems in rural communities with high energy costs

On and after November 28, 2001, notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Secretary of Agriculture, acting through the Administrator of the Rural Utilities Service 1 shall use the authorities provided in the Rural Electrification Act of 1936 [7 U.S.C. 901 et seq.] to finance the acquisition of existing generation, transmission and distribution systems and facilities serving high cost, predominantly rural areas by entities capable of and dedicated to providing or improving service in such areas in an efficient and cost effective manner.

(Pub. L. 107–76, title VII, §748, Nov. 28, 2001, 115 Stat. 738; Pub. L. 115–334, title XII, §12408(b), Dec. 20, 2018, 132 Stat. 4977.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Rural Electrification Act of 1936, referred to in text, is act May 20, 1936, ch. 432, 49 Stat. 1363, which is classified generally to this chapter (§901 et seq.). For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 901 of this title and Tables.

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2002, and not as part of the Rural Electrification Act of 1936 which comprises this chapter.

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in the following prior appropriation act:

Pub. L. 106–387, §1(a) [title I, §771], Oct. 28, 2000, 114 Stat. 1549, 1549A–45.

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–334 inserted "the Secretary of Agriculture, acting through" before "the Administrator of the Rural Utilities Service".

1 So in original. Probably should be followed by a comma.
#### CONNELL, Respondent, v. NEW YORK CENT. & H. R. R. CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

October 27, 1903.)

Action by Millie J. Connell, as administratrix, against the New York Central & Hudson River Railroad Company.

No opinion. Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied, with $10 costs.
#### Millwork Center, Inc., Appellant, v. Lasker-Goldman Corporation et al., Respondents.

Motion by respondent Lasker-Goldman Corporation to dismiss appeal denied, on condition that appellant perfect the appeal and be ready to argue or submit it at the February Term, beginning January 30, 1961. The appeal is ordered on the calendar for said term. The record and appellant’s brief must be served and filed on or before January 16, 1961. Beldock, Acting P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Pette, JJ., concur.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 5.1.1

Eastern Division

Balshe LLC, et al.

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:12−cv−00966

Honorable James B. Zagel

Alan J Ross, et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Monday, January 13, 2014:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable James B. Zagel: Plaintiffs' Motion for

Reassignment [84] is granted. Hearing set for 1/21/14 is stricken and no appearance is

necessary. Mailed notice(ep, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:12-cv-00966 Document #: 88 Filed: 01/13/14 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:821
#### § 989.6 Budgeting and funding.

Contract EIAP efforts are proponent MAJCOM responsibilities. Each year, the EPF programs for anticipated out-year EIAP workloads based on inputs from command proponents. If proponent offices exceed the budget in a given year or identify unforeseen requirements, the proponent offices must provide the remaining funding.
Recorder’s Stamp

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION
PEOPLES UNITED EQUIPMENT FINANCE )
CORP., )
)
Plaintiff, )
)
v. ) Case No. 12cv842
)
ZONNEX TRANS INC., LUKA UNLIMITED, ) Honorable Judge John F. Grady
INC., and KINGA M. SAVIC, an individual, )
) Magistrate Judge Maria Valdez
Defendants. )

MEMORANDUM OF JUDGMENT

On February 6, 2012, a foreign Judgment was registered in favor of Plaintiff, Peoples
United Equipment Finance Corp., and against Defendant, LUKA UNLIMITED, INC., whose
last known address is 1106 Dawes, Libertyville, Illinois 60048, in the amount of Five Hundred
Forty Thousand, Three Hundred Ninety ‘s and Two Cents ($540,390.02), plus costs of

court and post-judgment interest. : iy a
a 7
bna_€ Si Nradey

Honorable John F. Grady

AFTER RECORDING, PLEASE RETURN mi Vase ie

Charles E. Harper, Jr.
QUARLES & BRADY LLP
300 North LaSalle Street
Suite 4000

Chicago, Illinois 60654
(312) 715-5000

QB\16087555.1
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Kenneth Patno, Appellant.

Motion for an extension of time within which to perfect appeal. Motion granted and time is extended to the November 1960 Term of this court. Present — Bergan, P. J., Coon, Gibson, Herlihy and Reynolds, JJ.
#### Annette Fobbs, Appellant, v Yama Rahimzada, Respondent, et al., Defendants.

[834 NYS2d 329]—

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Weiss, J.), entered March 17, 2006, which granted the motion of the defendant Yama Rahimzada for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against him.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff, while walking on the public sidewalk in front of the premises owned by the defendant Yama Rahimzada (hereinafter the defendant), allegedly tripped and fell and was injured when the cellar doors located in the sidewalk began to open.

The defendant established his prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law *(see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp.,*68 NY2d 320 [1986]). He established that the plaintiffs fall was the result of an unidentified person, presumably the agent and/or employee of a tenant in possession, opening the cellar doors from inside, and was not caused by any defect or dangerous condition concerning the cellar doors. In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact to substantiate her conclusory allegation that the cellar doors were somehow defective or constituted a dangerous condition *(id.; Cordova v City of New York,*22 AD3d 784, 785 [2005]). Accordingly, the court properly granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against him *(see generally Lezama v 34-15 Parsons Blvd, LLC,*16 AD3d 560 [2005]).

The Supreme Court properly rejected the plaintiff s argument that the defendant’s motion for summary judgment should have *812been denied on the ground that facts essential to justify opposition to the motion may exist upon further discovery. The plaintiff failed to make the requisite evidentiary showing supporting her contention in this regard (see CPLR 3212 [f]; *Cordova v City of New York, supra*at 785; *Lopes v Sears, Roebuck & Co.,*273 AD2d 360, 361 [2000]).

In light of our determination, the plaintiffs remaining contentions are academic. Crane, J.P., Krausman, Goldstein and Dillon, JJ., concur.
Editorial Note on Part 842
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 842 appear at 81 FR 83688, Nov. 22, 2016.

§ 842.65 Delegations of authority. ( a ) *Settlement authority.* The following individuals have delegated authority to settle claims for $1,000 or less and deny them in any amount. ( 1 ) The Judge Advocate General.
( 2 ) The Deputy Judge Advocate General.
( 3 ) Director of Civil Law.
( 4 ) Chief, Deputy Chief and Branch Chiefs, Claims and Tort Litigation staff.
( 5 ) SJA of the Air Force component commands of the U.S. geographic combatant commands.
( 6 ) SJAs of single base GCMs and GCMs in PACAF and USAFE.
( 7 ) The SJA of each Air Force base, station and fixed installation.
( 8 ) Any other judge advocate designated by The Judge Advocate General.
( b ) *Redelegation of authority.* A settlement authority may redelegate it to a subordinate judge advocate or civilian attorney in writing.
( c ) *Authority to reduce, withdraw, and restore settlement authority.* Any superior settlement authority may reduce, withdraw, or restore delegated authority.
[55 FR 2809, Jan. 29, 1990. Redesignated and amended at 81 FR 83695, Nov. 22, 2016]