alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 10.5**July 24, 2006Jim KerrDear Jim:I am delighted to offer you the position of Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer ofJo-Ann Stores, Inc. All of my personal contacts with Board members and other members of Jo-Ann’ssenior leadership team, have reiterated to me your ability and willingness to help lead Jo-Ann backto the prominence of being the premier fabric and craft retailer.The following provides the terms and conditions of your employment offer:1) Your promotion date will become effective immediately.2) Your annual base salary will be increased to $300,000 paid in bi-weekly installments of$11,538.46 with an annual review in February or March of each year.3) Your Target incentive under the Management Incentive Plan for FY08 will be increased to 50%of earned salary.4) Beginning in fiscal year 2008, you will participate in the Jo-Ann Stores, Inc. long-termincentive plan at a level commensurate with your position relative to other executiveofficers. As you know, annual grants under this plan are determined by the board of directorsbased on peer incentive compensation levels and the specific needs and circumstances of theCompany. In addition, on the first Friday following the effective date in your new position,you will receive: a) A grant of 10,000 shares of Jo-Ann Stores, Inc. common stock These shares will vest50% after (3) three years and 50% after (4) years.  b) A grant of 25,000 non-qualified options to purchase shares of Jo-Ann Stores, Inc.common stock. These options will vest 25% annually on the first four anniversaries of yourstart date and be exercisable for seven years from date of issuance. These options will bepriced at the closing price of Jo-Ann Stores common stock on the day of the grant.5) Your car allowance will be increased to $1,300 per month. 6) Your PTO will remain the same.7) We will provide you with an allowance of up to $5,000 annually to be used for tax andfinancial planning purposes.8) You will be eligible to participate in the Company’s SERP pending approval at the next Boardof Directors Meeting, with a maximum benefit of $600,000 subject to the terms of the plan.
 

 
9) The Company will enter into a separate agreement with you covering severance in the eventthat your employment is terminated by the Company without cause or by you or the Company as aresult of a Change in Control.Jim, I am very excited to promote you to Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer forJo-Ann Stores, Inc. I am very confident that you will continue to make an impact and I lookforward to working with you.Please confirm your agreement to accept this position by signing and returning one copy of thisletter. Thank you.Sincerely,        /s/ Darrell Webb   Darrell Webb   Chairman, President, & CEO    Agreed to this on the 27th day of July, 2006.        /s/ Jim Kerr   Jim Kerr
#### 15.400 Scope of subpart.

This subpart prescribes the cost and price negotiation policies and procedures for pricing negotiated prime contracts (including subcontracts) and contract modifications, including modifications to contracts awarded by sealed bidding.
In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 19-1753V

UNPUBLISHED

JASON MANUS,

 Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES,

 Respondent.

Chief Special Master Corcoran 

Filed: April 29, 2021

Special Processing Unit (SPU);

Ruling on Entitlement; Concession;

Table Injury; Human Papillomavirus 

(HPV) Vaccine; Shoulder Injury 

Related to Vaccine Administration 

(SIRVA)

Maximillian J. Muller, Muller Brazil, LLP, Dresher, PA, for petitioner.

Jennifer Leigh Reynaud, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1

On November 13, 2019, Jason Manus filed a petition for compensation under the 

National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.

2 (the 

“Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that he suffered a right shoulder injury related to vaccine 

administration (SIRVA) resulting from a human papillomavirus vaccination administered 

on January 24, 2019. Petition at Preamble. The case was assigned to the Special 

Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

On April 28, 2021, Respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes that 

Petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at 1. 

Specifically, Petitioner had no history of pain, inflammation, or dysfunction of his shoulder; 

1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required 

to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-Government Act 

of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government 

Services). This means the ruling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance 

with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, 

the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that 

the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access. 

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease 

of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa 

(2012).
2

medical records document that the shoulder pain occurred within 48 hours of vaccination; 

the pain was limited to the shoulder in which the vaccine was administered; and no other 

condition or abnormality has been identified to explain Petitioner’s shoulder pain. Id. at 4. 

Respondent further agrees that Petitioner suffered the residual effects of the condition for 

more than six months. Id.

In view of Respondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that 

Petitioner is entitled to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Brian H. Corcoran

Brian H. Corcoran

Chief Special Master
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION 

UNITED STATES, ) No. 12 CR 109

 )

) Judge Sharon Johnson Coleman

 vs. )

Heon Seok Lee

Motion to Withdraw As Attorneys for Defendant

Susan Shatz and Cynthia Giacchetti respectfully move this Honorable Court for

Leave to Withdraw as the attorneys for Defendant Heon Seok Lee and submit the

following in support of this motion:

1. Attorneys Susan Shatz and Cynthia Giacchetti were previously appointed

under the Criminal Justice Act to represent Defendant Heon Seok Lee in this matter.

2. In the early afternoon of April 29, 2016, counsel informed Defendant Heon

Seok Lee by e-mail of their intention to file a Motion to Withdraw as his attorneys in this

matter because of irreconcilable differences. In the e-mail, Counsel offered to set up a

meeting if Mr. Lee wanted to discuss the matter in person. Counsel also attempted to

contact Mr. Lee by telephone and text but were unsuccessful. 

3. Later in the day on April 29, 2016, Mr. Lee informed counsel by e-mail that he

no longer wanted their representation and that he intends to hire private counsel to

represent him in this matter.

Case: 1:12-cr-00109 Document #: 61 Filed: 05/02/16 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:220
4. On May 2, 2016, Attorney Adam Sheppard contacted undersigned counsel

and AUSA Otlewski, and stated that he intends to seek leave of the court to file his

appearance on behalf of Mr. Lee.

Wherefore, for the foregoing reasons, undersigned counsel respectfully requests

that this Honorable Court grant them leave to withdraw as attorneys for Defendant

Heon Seok Lee in this matter. 

Respectfully submitted,

S/Susan Shatz

Susan Shatz

/s/Cynthia Giacchetti

Cynthia Giacchetti

Susan Shatz

53 W. Jackson Blvd, Suite 1615

Chicago, Illinois 60604

312-697-0022

Cynthia Giacchetti

53 W. Jackson Blvd., Suite 1035

Chicago, Illinois 60604

312-939-6440

2

Case: 1:12-cr-00109 Document #: 61 Filed: 05/02/16 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:221
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, Susan Shatz, an attorney, certify that I caused a copy of the above, Motion to

Withdraw, to be served by electronic filing on May 2, 2016; 

on:

AUSA Patrick Otlewski

U.S. Attorney's Office

219 S. Dearborn St., 5th Floor

Chicago, IL 60604

Executed on, May 2, 2016

 S/ Susan Shatz_________________

3

Case: 1:12-cr-00109 Document #: 61 Filed: 05/02/16 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:222
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

October 31, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

131807 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Maura D. Corrigan Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, v SC: 131807 Justices 

 COA: 270255 

Wayne CC: 05-009430-02 

HASSAN HARAJLI,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 12, 2006 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the question presented should now be reviewed by this Court. 

s1023 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 31, 2006 

 Clerk
Exhibit
21.1





MDI,
Inc. – Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2007








FAS
Construction Management, Inc. - Texas - Active


STC
Holdings, Inc. - Texas - Active


Global
Systems Solutions, Inc. - Delaware - Active (a/k/a Professional Services
Group)


ABM Data
Systems, Inc. - Texas - Inactive


Monitor
Dynamics, Inc. - California - Inactive


MDI S.A.
- Switzerland - Inactive


MDI
France, S.A. - France - Inactive


Apoyos
Empresariales CM, S. de R.L. de C.V. – Mexico - Active


Servicios
de Ingenieria CM, S. de R.L. de C.V. – Mexico - Active
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsOutline for reusable reentry satellite system specification, volumes 1 - volume 9This document describes the outline proposed by the SAIC team for the RRS System Specification document. This document will be updated periodically during the course of the study, providing design insights and information pertinent to the various elements of the RRS design. The RRS System Specification document organization is shown schematically. The RRS Vehicle (RRV), Payload Module (PM), and the Operations Support (OS) are the three main segments of the overall system for which formal interface control will exist. The number and relationship of these interface specifications to the main segments is also shown.Document ID19930006602Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateOctober 1, 1989Subject CategorySpacecraft Design, Testing And PerformanceReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.26:185958NASA-CR-185958SAIC-RRS-011-VOL-1-9Accession Number93N15791Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS9-18202Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19930006602.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISON

FASCIA EDWARDS, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) No. 12 C 371

v. ) Hon. Marvin Aspen

)

ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE )

PROFESSIONAL REGULATIONS, et al. )

)

Defendants. )

DEFENDANT’S MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 7

TO BAR EVIDENCE OF AND REFERENCE TO EQUITABLE DAMAGES, 

INCLUDING BACK WAGES, PENSION BENEFITS, AND HEALTH BENEFITS 

Defendant, by and through its attorney, Lisa Madigan, Attorney General for Illinois, 

hereby moves this Honorable Court to enter the following order in limine:

1. In this case, Plaintiff seeks, amongst other relief under the ADA, back pay and 

reimbursement for lost pension, social security and other benefits, and out-of-pocket expenses. 

Fourth Am. Compl. at 8-9 (ECF No. 44).

2. Such equitable remedies are matters that should be determined by the Court only 

after a jury determination of liability in favor of the Plaintiff. See Pals v. Schepel Buick & GMC 

Truck, Inc., 220 F.3d 495, 500-01 (7th Cir. 2000).

3. Accordingly, Defendant moves to bar the Plaintiff from asserting, claiming, 

presenting evidence regarding, or referencing any request for back wages, pension benefits, 

health benefits, or other equitable remedies to the jury. See id.

Case: 1:12-cv-00371 Document #: 212 Filed: 03/16/17 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:2810
WHEREFORE, Defendant moves this Honorable Court enter an Order excluding 

evidence, testimony, or argument related to equitable damages including, but not limited to, back 

wages, pension benefits, health benefits, and for such further relief that the Court finds 

reasonable and just.

Respectfully Submitted,

LISA MADIGAN s/ Kevin Lovellette

Illinois Attorney General Kevin Lovellette

Assistant Attorney General

General Law Bureau

100 W. Randolph Street, 13th Floor

Chicago, Illinois 60601

(312) 814-3720

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that on March 16, 2017, he electronically filed the foregoing 

document with the Clerk of the Court for the United States District Court for the Northern 

District of Illinois using the CM/ECF system. All participants in the case are registered CM/ECF 

users who will be served by the CM/ECF system.

s/ Kevin Lovellette

Case: 1:12-cv-00371 Document #: 212 Filed: 03/16/17 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:2811
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 23



                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
                       ----------------------------------

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-48781, 333-54504, 333-54504-01, and 333-54504-
02) of PPL Corporation and in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 33-
50031, 333-02003 and 333-95967) of PPL Corporation of our report dated January
29, 2001 relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial
statement schedules, which appears in this Form 10-K.



PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
March 1, 2001

                                       1
(December 15, 1978)

#### In the Matter of David E. Hazell, Respondent, v Carol A. Hazell, Appellant.

Order unanimously modified, and, as modified, affirmed, with costs to appellant, in accordance with the following memorandum: Petitioner husband made application for modification of an order requiring him to pay $50 weekly alimony to respondent, his former wife, and to pay $40 weekly for the support of each of his children. He requested that the provision for alimony be deleted and that the support payments be reduced to $25 per week for each child. The court conducted a hearing, at which it was established that petitioner has remarried and has an annual income of about $5,000 more than when the order sought to be modified was made, and that respondent, who at the time of said order was without income and was a full-time student, is now employed and earning approximately $12,800 per year. Upon that evidence the court denied the application to reduce the weekly support payments for the children and ordered petitioner to con*987tinue to pay $120 weekly therefor; that the $50 per week alimony be deleted retroactive to the date of the petition, to wit, March 24, 1977, and that the $2,000 of alimony paid by petitioner since the date of the petition be recouped by him by withholding $100 per month for 20 months from his weekly payments for the support of the children; and the court denied the wife’s application for counsel fees in opposing the petition. We find no abuse of discretion in the order of the court deleting the alimony (see Domestic Relations Law, §236). Similarly, we find no reason to interfere with the court’s determination to make the deletion of alimony retroactive to the date on which the petition was filed, to wit, March 24, 1977. We think, however, that it was an abuse of discretion for the court to charge the children $2,000 for petitioner’s overpayment of alimony by authorizing petitioner to withhold $100 per month for 20 months from his weekly support payments for the children. That provision of the order is, therefore, reversed without prejudice to petitioner renewing his application to Family Court for some proper method of recouping said $2,000, upon a showing that respondent has the means of providing such recoupment without endangering the welfare of the children. With respect to respondent wife’s application for counsel fees, we think that the court did not abuse its discretion in denying such fees for services to the wife in resisting the request for deletion of alimony but the court did abuse its discretion in denying counsel fees to the wife for resisting the application to reduce the payments for support for the children. That provision of the order is, therefore, reversed and the matter is remitted to Family Court to award respondent reasonable counsel fees for resisting petitioner’s application for reduction of support payments for the children. (Appeal from order of Monroe County Family Court—support.) Present—Marsh, P. J., Moule, Simons, Schnepp and Witmer, JJ.
EXHIBIT C

Case: 1:12-cv-01410 Document #: 161-3 Filed: 06/22/15 Page 1 of 4 PageID #:1522
BEFORE THE 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

_________________________________________ 

 ) 

Application of ) 

 ) 

TRANSCARGA INT'L AIRWAYS, C.A. ) DOCKET OST-2001-11231 

 ) 

for amendment/renewal of an exemption ) 

(Venezuela-U.S. charter, all-cargo service) ) 

_________________________________________ ) 

MOTION OF TRANSCARGA INT'L AIRWAYS, C.A. 

FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT

Communications with respect to this document should be sent to: 

John R. Mietus, Jr. 

Law Office of John Mietus, LLC 

6701 Democracy Blvd., Suite 300 

Bethesda, MD 20817-7500 

(202) 747-5212 - Telephone 

(240) 396-5362 - Fax 

john@mietuslaw.com 

Counsel for TRANSCARGA INT'L 

AIRWAYS, C.A. 

April 27, 2012 
BEFORE THE 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

_________________________________________ 

 ) 

Application of ) 

 ) 

TRANSCARGA INT'L AIRWAYS, C.A. ) DOCKET OST-2001-11231 

 ) April 27, 2012 

for amendment/renewal of an exemption ) 

(Venezuela-U.S. charter, all-cargo service) ) 

_________________________________________ ) 

MOTION OF TRANSCARGA INT'L AIRWAYS, C.A. 

FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT

Pursuant to Rule 12 of the Department's Rules of Practice, 14 C.F.R. 

§ 302.12, Transcarga Int'l Airways, C.A. respectfully moves to withhold from 

public disclosure the contents of Confidential Exhibits A (6 pages) and B (4 

pages). In accordance with Rule 12, the exhibits have been marked 

"Confidential" and are being filed under seal. 

 Confidential Exhibits A and B contain financial and operational 

information relating to Transcarga and projections relating to the service it 

now proposes to operate with its own aircraft. The exhibits incorporate 

private, financial and commercial information of a type that is not usually 

disclosed to the public, and they are being provided to the Department solely 

in support of the application for exemption amendment/renewal filed 

simultaneously with this Motion. Disclosure of this information would cause 

material harm to Transcarga's competitive position.
#### Russell F. Hills *v.*State of Connecticut

*Harry W. Hultgren, Jr.,*assistant attorney general, and *Robert K. Killian,*attorney general, in support of the motion.

*Charles F. Corcoran III,*in opposition.

Submitted January 8

decided January 22, 1975

The defendant’s motion for a review of the trial court’s action in granting, without responsive pleadings, its plea in abatement in the appeal from the Superior Court in Hartford County is granted and the case is remanded to that court with direction that a hearing be held with responsive pleadings on the plea in abatement in accordance with § 95 of the Practice Book.
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 8 (Wednesday, January 13, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 2687]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-00488]



[[Page 2687]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Aging; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis 
Panel; Diversity in Aging.
    Date: February 26, 2021.
    Time: 2:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, 7201 
Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Video Meeting).
    Contact Person: Dario Dieguez, Jr., Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Branch, National Institute on Aging, 
National Institutes of Health, Gateway Building, Suite 2W200, 7201 
Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 827-3101, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#51353023383e7f3538343624342b113f38397f363e27"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="670306150e0849030e020012021d27090e0f49000811">[email protected]</span></a>

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging 
Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 7, 2021.
Miguelina Perez,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2021-00488 Filed 1-12-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT C

Case: 1:12-cv-00163 Document #: 1-3 Filed: 01/10/12 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:17
CORP/LLC - CERTIFICATE OF GOOD STANDING 12/27/11 7:38 PM

SERVICES PROGRAMS PRESS PUBLICATIONS DEPARTMENTS CONTACT

CORPORATION/LLC SEARCH RESULTS

Search Criteria: SEQUENCE

Entity Type

LLC MST

CORP MST

CORP MST

CORP OLD

CORP MST

CORP MST

LLC MST

File Number

02718995

63320781

56484361

67043952

58418617

56747613

02989026

Return to the Search Screen

Corporation/LLC Name

SEQUENCE OF C, LLC

SEQUENCE CONSULTING, INC.

SEQUENCE INDUSTRIES, INC.

SEQUENCE PHARMA SERVICES OPERATING, INC.

SEQUENCE TO THE FUTURE INC.

SEQUENCE TOOL CORPORATION

SEQUENCE TRADING GROUP LLC

BACK TO CYBERDRIVEILLINOIS.COM HOME PAGE

http://www. ilsos .gov / corporatetlc/Corporate LlcConrroller Page 1 of 1

Case: 1:12-cv-00163 Document #: 1-3 Filed: 01/10/12 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:18