alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000317781
<NAME> ANCHOR PACIFIC UNDERWRITERS, INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                       4,709,644
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,342,359
<ALLOWANCES>                                    32,438
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,263,651
<PP&E>                                       2,976,497
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,155,300
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,511,439
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        8,481,258
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        87,256
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,019,975
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,511,439
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,994,484
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                8,698,180
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             379,071
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (1,398,970)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,380
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (1,405,800)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (1,405,800)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.37)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.30)
        

</TABLE>
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-06-00050-CV

John Worldpeace, Appellant

v.

State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 345TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. GV502304, HONORABLE GISELA D. TRIANA, JUDGE PRESIDING 

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant John Worldpeace filed his notice of appeal on January 25, 2006 and the

clerk’s record was filed on June 26, 2006. On August 3, 2006, the Clerk of this Court sent

Worldpeace notice that his brief was overdue and that his appeal would be dismissed for want of

prosecution if he did not respond to this Court by August 14, 2006. To date, appellant has not

responded to this Court’s notice. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.

Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b), (c).

__________________________________________

Bob Pemberton, Justice

Before Justices B. A. Smith, Pemberton and Waldrop

Dismissed for Want of Prosecution

Filed: September 13, 2006
# Le\es -

~

—

RULE 206. STANDARDS FOR GRANTING APPLICATIONS

(Adapted 9

- 1

- 74)

1. The Air Pollution Control Officer shall deny an Authority to Construct, Permit to Operate or use, except as provided in R.ule 208 if the applicant does not show that every article, machine, equipment or other contrivance, the use of which may cause the issuance of air contaminants or the use of which may eliminate or reduce or control the issuance of air contaminants, is so designed, controlled, or equipped with such air pollution control equipment that it may be expected to operate without emitting air contaminants in violation of Section 41700 or 41701, Health & Safety Code, or of the District Rules and Regulations.

2. Before an Authority to Construct or Permit to Operate is granted, the Air Pollution Control Officer may require the applicant to provide and maintain such facilities as are necessary for sampling and testing purposes in order to secure information that will disclose the nature, extent, quantity or degree of air contaminants discharged into the atmosphere from the article, machine, equipment or other contrivance described in the Authority to Construct or Permit to Operate. In the event of ( such requirement, the Air Pollution Control Officer shall notify

the applicant in writing of the required size, number and location of sampling holes; the size and location of the sampling platform; the access to the sampling platform; and, the utilities for operating the sampling and testing equipment. The platform and access shall be constructed in accordance with the General Industrial Safety Orders of the State of California.

3. In acting upon a Permit to Operate, if the Air Pollution Control Officer finds that the article, machine, equipment or 

### other contrivance has not been constructed in accordance with the Authority to Construct , he shall deny the Permit to Operate . The Air Pollution Control Officer shall not accept any further application for permit to operate that article, machine, equipment, or other contrivance so constructed until he finds that the article, machine, equipment or other contrivance has been constructed

~ n accordance with the Authority to Construct.

4. The granting of a permit does not exempt the holder from present and future regulations of the Air Pollution Control District .



### * * * * *

103084 RULE 206
|  |  |  | Information For          StudentsParentsTeachersAdministratorsInformation AboutGrants & ContractsFinancial AidResearch & StatisticsPolicyPrograms |  |  |
|--|--|--|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|

 

 

The Office for Civil Rights (OCR) home page has moved to a new address.  You will be forwarded to the new address at http://www.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/index.html in 10 seconds.  Please remember to update your bookmarks.
# February 2023 FOIA Log
Editorial Note on Part 842
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 842 appear at 81 FR 83688, Nov. 22, 2016.

§ 842.36 Who may file a claim. ( a ) Owners of the property or their authorized agents may file claims for property damage.
( b ) Injured persons or their duly authorized agents may file claims for personal injury.
( c ) Duly appointed guardians of minor children or any other persons legally entitled to do so under applicable local law may file claims for minors' personal injuries.
( d ) Executors or administrators of a decedent's estate or another person legally entitled to do so under applicable local law, may file claims based on: ( 1 ) An individual's death.
( 2 ) A cause of action surviving an individual's death.
( e ) Insurers with subrogation rights may file claims for losses paid in full by them. The parties may file claims jointly or individually, to the extent of each party's interest, for losses partially paid by insurers with subrogation rights.
( f ) Authorized agents signing claims show their title or legal capacity and present evidence of authority to present the claims.
[55 FR 2809, Jan. 29, 1990. Redesignated at 81 FR 83690, Nov. 22, 2016]
AAM-13-225-E April 11, 2013

Exemption No. 10298A Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2011-0616

Mr. William Leppert

Chief Pilot/DER Long Bay Aviation, LLC

538 Wild Horse Court Myrtle Beach, SC 29579

Dear Mr. Leppert:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption No. 10298. It explains the basis for our decision, describes its effect, and lists the conditions

and limitations.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated February 21, 2013, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Adm inistration (FAA) on behalf of Long Bay Aviation, LLC (Long Bay) for an extension of Exemption No. 10298. That exemption from part 120 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) allows Long Bay, which is operating under separate parts of the regulations, to cover its safety-sensitive employees under one testing program.

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition

in the Federal Register because the requested extension of the exemption would not set a precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Long Bay.2

Our Decision

The FAA has determ ined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 10298 remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the authority provided by 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has delegated to me, I grant your petition, subject to the following conditions and limitations.

Conditions and Limitations

1. Employees of Long Bay are subject to the drug and alcohol regulations at all times while conducting operations under part 135 or part 91.

2. The drug and alcohol testing program must be implemented under the auspices of the Long Bay part 135 operation, not under part 91.

The Effect of Our Decision

Our decision extends the term ination date of Exemption No. 10298 to June 30, 2015, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/ Frederick E. Tilton, M.D. Federal Air Surgeon
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice: 11322]

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: I hereby determine that certain objects being imported from abroad pursuant to agreements with their foreign owners or custodians for temporary display in the exhibition “Asia Society Triennial: We Do Not Dream Alone (Part 2)” at the Asia Society Museum, New York, New York, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, are of cultural significance, and, further, that their temporary exhibition or display within the United States as aforementioned are in the national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these determinations be published in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Chi D. Tran, Program Administrator, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-632-6471; email:                         *section2459@state.gov*). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, L/PD, SA-5, Suite 5H03, Washington, DC 20522-0505.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    See also the                     **Federal Register**                     notice for the “Asia Society Triennial: We Do Not Dream Alone (Part 1)” exhibition that was published August 20, 2020, on page 51544 (volume 85, number 162).                

                    The foregoing determinations were made pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681,                     *et seq.;*22 U.S.C. 6501 note,                     *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 2000.                

Marie Therese Porter Royce,

Assistant Secretary, Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 2021-00950 Filed 1-15-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

Financial AidFINANCIAL AID PROFESSIONALS

## Top 100 Current Holders of FFELP  Loans as of 9/30/99

(Dollars in Millions)
#### 1652.224-70 Confidentiality of records.

As prescribed in 1624.104, the following clause shall be inserted in all FEHBP contracts:

# Confidentiality of Records (JAN 1991)

(a) The Carrier shall use the personal data on employees and annuitants that is provided by agencies and OPM, including social security numbers, for only those routine uses stipulated for the data and published annually in the Federal Register as a part of OPM's notice of systems of records.

(b) The Carrier shall also hold all medical records, and information relating thereto, of Federal subscribers and family members confidential except as follows:

(1) As may be reasonably necessary for the administration of this contract;

(2) As authorized by the patient or his or her guardian;

(3) As disclosure is necessary to permit Government officials having authority to investigate and prosecute alleged civil or criminal actions;

(4) As necessary to audit the contract;

(5) As necessary to carry out the coordination of benefits provisions of this contract; and

(6) For bona fide medical research or educational purposes. Release of information for medical research or educational purposes shall be limited to aggregated information of a statistical nature that does not identify any individual by name, social security number, or any other identifier unique to an individual.

(c) If the carrier uses medical records for the administration of the contract, or for bona fide medical research or educational purposes, it shall so state in the plan's brochure.

(End of clause)

[52 FR 16044, May 1, 1987, as amended at 55 FR 27417, July 2, 1990]
Search ED.govAdvanced Search


Federal Student      Loan Programs Data BookFiscal      Years 1997-2000 Office of      Postsecondary EducationPolicy, Planning, and Innovation Policy, Budget      and Analysis Staff Policy and      Budget Development Unit    Department of Education seal  CONTENTS    NEXT >
 U.S. Department     of Education
    Rod PaigeSecretary Office of      Postsecondary Education
    Sally L. StroupAssistant      Secretary for Postsecondary Education Policy &      Budget Development UnitDavid Bergeron
    Chief April 2002 This report is      in the public domain. Authorization to reproduce it in whole or in part is      granted. While permission to reprint this publication is not necessary, the      citation should be: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Postsecondary      Education, Office of Policy, Planning & Innovation, Federal Student      Loan Programs Data Book, Fiscal Years 1997-2000, Washington, D.C., 2002. To order copies      of this report,


> write      to: ED Pubs, Education Publications Center, U.S. Department of Education,      P.O. Box 1398, Jessup, MD 20794-1398;
>   or      fax your request to: (301) 470-1244;
>   or email your request to: edpubs@inet.ed.gov.
>   or call in your request toll-free: 1-877-433-7827 (1-877-4-ED-PUBS). If 877      service is not yet available in your area, call 1-800-872-5327 (1-800-USA-LEARN).      Those who use a telecommunication device for the deaf (TDD) or a teletypewriter      (TTY) should call 1-800-437-0833.
>   or order online at: http://www.edpubs.ed.gov/webstore/Content/search.asp.

This report is      also available on the Department's Web site at: www.ed.gov/finaid/prof/resources/data/ope.html.  CONTENTS      NEXT >Federal Student          Loan Programs Data Book  -  FY 1997-FY 2000
#### 1352.201-72 Contracting Officer's Representative (COR).

As prescribed in 48 CFR 1301.670-70, insert the following clause:

# Contracting Officer's Representative (COR) (APR 2010)

(a) ______________________ is hereby designated as the Contracting Officer's Representative (COR). The COR may be changed at any time by the Government without prior notice to the contractor by a unilateral modification to the contract. The COR is located at:

Phone Number:

E-mail:

(b) The responsibilities and limitations of the COR are as follows:

(1) The COR is responsible for the technical aspects of the contract and serves as technical liaison with the contractor. The COR is also responsible for the final inspection and acceptance of all deliverables and such other responsibilities as may be specified in the contract.

(2) The COR is not authorized to make any commitments or otherwise obligate the Government or authorize any changes which affect the contract price, terms or conditions. Any contractor request for changes shall be referred to the Contracting Officer directly or through the COR. No such changes shall be made without the express written prior authorization of the Contracting Officer. The Contracting Officer may designate assistant or alternate COR(s) to act for the COR by naming such assistant/alternate(s) in writing and transmitting a copy of such designation to the contractor.

(End of clause)

[75 FR 10570, Mar. 8, 2010; 75 FR 14496, Mar. 26, 2010]
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. John Battaglia, Appellant.

Motion to enlarge time for argument of appeal to include September 1960 Term of court granted on condition that appellant’s brief be filed and served on or before June 15, 1960, respondent’s brief June 15, 1960, respondent’s brief, or a demand therefor pursuant to rule VII of the Appellate Division, Fourth Department, Calendar Rules, to be filed by August 15,1960, and ease set down for argument at the September 1960 Term of court.
#### 14.212 Economic purchase quantities (supplies).

Contracting officers shall comply with the economic purchase quantity planning requirements for supplies in subpart 7.2. See 7.203 for instructions regarding use of the provision at 52.207-4, Economic Purchase Quantity—Supplies, and 7.204 for guidance on handling responses to that provision.

[50 FR 35479, Aug. 30, 1985]
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Bryan Buchanan v. Matthew McEneny and Ken Black

Appellate case number: 01-18-00530-CV

Trial court case number: 2016-87311

Trial court: 55th District Court of Harris County

Appellant, Bryan Buchanan, has filed a notice of appeal of the trial court’s final 

judgment signed on May 15, 2018. A reporter’s record was due to be filed by July 16, 

2018. On November 8, 2018, the court reporter responsible for preparing the reporter’s 

record requested an extension of time to file the reporters’ record, stating that “[t]he 

deposit is in the mail to [her].” We granted the request and extended the time to 

December 10, 2018. When no reporter’s record was filed, we ordered the court reporter, 

or substitute court reporter, to file the reporter’s record no later than January 11, 2019. No 

reporter’s record has been filed, and the court reporter has not otherwise responded to this 

Court’s order.

Accordingly, appellant shall pay, or make arrangements to pay, for preparation of 

the reporter’s record, and shall provide written proof to the Clerk of this Court that he has 

paid, or made arrangements to pay, for the reporter’s record no later than 30 days from 

the date of this order. Further, Gina Jackson, the official court reporter, or substitute court 

reporter, no later than 30 days from the date of this order, shall file a reporter’s record in 

this appeal or notify the Clerk of this Court of the status of the arrangements for 

preparation of the reporter’s record.

Absent a timely response, the Court may require appellant to file his brief and will

consider and decide the appeal on those issues or points that do not require a reporter’s 

record for a decision. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(c).

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s Russell Lloyd

  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: ___February 21, 2019___
#### In the Matter of Alphonso M. La Pera, as Executor of Ermenegildo Navone, Deceased. (Proceeding No. 1.) In the Matter of the Accounting of Alphonso M. La Pera, as Executor of Ermenegildo Navone, Deceased. (Proceeding No. 2.) Giuseppina Navone et al., Appellants; Eugene Cantino et al., Respondents.

In consolidated proceedings by testator’s executor: (1) for judicial instructions as to the propriety and terms of sale of the testator’s interest in a business owned by him and Eugene Cantino, as partners; and (2) for the judicial settlement of the executor’s account, testator’s wife and daughter, Guiseppina Navone and Olimpia Maria Bianehi, who are the sole legatees, appeal from so much of an order of the Surrogate’s Court, Nassau County, dated May 23, 1960, as modifies a subpoena duces tecum served by them upon Cantino, by excluding' therefrom the books and records relating to said business from and after August 1, 1957. Testator and Cantino, as partners, owned and operated a certain restaurant business until testator’s death on July 30, 1957. Since testator’s death, Cantino has operated the business alone. A written partnership agreement, expiring March 31, 1951, provided that if either partner should die during the term of the partnership, the value of his interest in the partnership should be determined by appraisal and the surviving partner should pay the estate, of the deceased partner the amount of such appraisal within a stated period. Thereafter, without any further written agreement, the business was continued by Cantino and testator until the latter’s death. In these proceedings, to which Cantino is not a party, testator’s wife and daughter claim in substance, among other things, that the appraisals had pursuant to the afore-mentioned provision are not correct. They also question the applicability of the terms of the partnership agreement to the sale of testator’s partnership interest and assert that the estate is entitled to its share in the profits of the business for the period subsequent to testator’s death. They served a subpoena duces tecum upon Cantino, seeking, *inter alia,*the production of the books and records of the business for the period following testator’s death. A motion by Cantino to vacate the subpoena was granted to the extent of eliminating the production of the books and records for that period. The Surrogate held that the underlying question in the proceedings was whether there was a valid partnership agreement in effect at the time of testator’s death and that after the determination of such question the propriety of the production of the records for the period subsequent to the date of death would again be considered. Order insofar as appealed from affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Christ and Brennan, JJ., concur.