alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2

                         CERTIFICATION OF VICE PRESIDENT
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Peter Porath, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Federal Mortgage
Corporation of Puerto Rico, Inc.

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date.

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or
in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date:  August 18, 2006


/s/ Peter Porath
-----------------------------
Peter Porath
Vice President



                                       11
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

NOEL DEJESUS GARCIA,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D16-1899 

[December 14, 2017]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; Krista Marx, Judge; L.T. Case No. 50-2015-CF-005669-

AXXX-MB.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Narine N. Austin, Assistant 

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Georgina 

Jimenez-Orosa, Senior Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for 

appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GERBER, C.J., CIKLIN and LEVINE, JJ., concur. 

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

ROBERT HADLEY HEIZELMAN,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 11-50226

D.C. No. 3:10-cr-02417-H-1

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of California

Marilyn L. Huff, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 7, 2012** 

Pasadena, California

Before: FARRIS, CLIFTON, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.

Heizelman was convicted of two counts of threatening a judge, in violation

of 18 U.S.C. § 115(a)(1)(B). He appeals, arguing that his jury waiver was not

FILED

MAR 26 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2

voluntary, knowing, and intelligent and that his statements were not “true threats”

and are therefore protected speech. We affirm. 

We review de novo the adequacy of a jury waiver. United States v.

Duarte-Higareda, 113 F.3d 1000, 1002 (9th Cir. 1997). Given the “suspected

presence of mental or emotional instability” in a defendant, the district court is

required “to conduct an in-depth colloquy” to assure that the defendant’s waiver of

a jury trial is voluntary, knowing, and intelligent. Id. at 1003 (internal citation and

quotations omitted). The record establishes that the district court’s colloquy was

sufficiently in-depth to assure that Heizelman’s waiver was voluntary, knowing,

and intelligent. 

If a defendant moves for acquittal at trial, we review de novo the sufficiency

of the evidence. United States v. Stewart, 420 F.3d 1007, 1014 (9th Cir. 2005). If

a party fails to make a timely assertion of rights, however, the right is forfeited and

we review for plain error. United States v. Perez, 116 F.3d 840, 845 (9th Cir.

1997). We must also determine whether the statement constitutes a true threat,

unprotected by the First Amendment, Stewart, 420 F.3d at 1015, which requires

proof “that the speaker subjectively intended the speech as a threat,” Id. at 1017

(internal citation and quotations omitted); see United States v. Bagdasarian, 652

F.3d 1113, 1117 (9th Cir. 2011) (subjective test “must be read into all threat
3

statutes that criminalize pure speech”). There was no error. The record contains

sufficient evidence to establish the elements of the statutory violation, see Stewart,

420 F.3d at 1015, and Heizelman’s calls to the district court were “true threats.” 

AFFIRMED.
### §7786. Authorization of appropriations

#### (a) Grants

To carry out section 7783 of this title, there are authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary $7,500,000 for each of fiscal years 2005 through 2009, of which not more than 5 percent of the funds made available for a fiscal year may be used by the Secretary for administrative costs.

#### (b) Agreements

To carry out section 7784 of this title, there are authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary $7,500,000 for each of fiscal years 2005 through 2009, of which not more than 5 percent of the funds made available for a fiscal year may be used by the Secretary for administrative costs of Federal agencies.

(Pub. L. 106–224, title IV, §457, as added Pub. L. 108–412, §1, Oct. 30, 2004, 118 Stat. 2324.)
| (1)  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended July 9, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 780(d)); and |
|-----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated: August 23, 2010   | /s/ Raymond F. Lancy                    |   |
|------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------|--------|
|                               | Raymond F. Lancy, Chief Financial Officer    |   |
|                               | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |   |
### §§204c to 219. Repealed. June 27, 1952, ch. 477, title IV, §403(a)(23), (36), (44), (45), 66 Stat. 279, 280, eff. Dec. 24, 1952

Section 204c, act June 28, 1932, ch. 283, §3, 47 Stat. 336, related to deportation as public charge.

Section 204d, act June 28, 1932, ch. 283, §4, 47 Stat. 336, related to definitions.

Section 205, act May 26, 1924, ch. 190, §5, 43 Stat. 155, defined quota immigrant.

Section 206, acts May 26, 1924, ch. 190, §6, 43 Stat. 155; May 29, 1928, ch. 914, §3, 45 Stat. 1009; July 11, 1932, ch. 471, §2, 47 Stat. 656; May 19, 1948, ch. 311, §2, 62 Stat. 241, related to enumeration of preferences within quotas.

Section 207, act May 26, 1924, ch. 190, §7, 43 Stat. 156, related to application for visas.

Section 208, act May 26, 1924, ch. 190, §8, 43 Stat. 156, related to nonquota immigration visas.

Section 209, acts May 26, 1924, ch. 190, §9, 43 Stat. 157; May 14, 1937, ch. 182, §1, 50 Stat. 164, related to visas of nonquota and preferred immigrants.

Section 210, acts May 26, 1924, ch. 190, §10, 43 Stat. 158; June 3, 1948, ch. 403, 62 Stat. 335, related to reentry permits.

Section 211, acts May 26, 1924, ch. 190, §11, 43 Stat. 159; Mar. 4, 1927, ch. 514, 44 Stat. 1455; Mar. 31, 1928, ch. 306, 45 Stat. 400, related to immigration quotas as determined by national origin.

Section 212, act May 26, 1924, ch. 190, §12, 43 Stat. 160, related to determination of nationality. See section 1152 of this title.

Section 212a, acts Dec. 17, 1943, ch. 344, §2, 57 Stat. 601; Aug. 9, 1946, ch. 945, §2, 60 Stat. 975, related to reentry permits for Chinese persons.

Section 212b, act July 2, 1946, ch. 534, §4, 60 Stat. 417, related to reentry permits for Indians and races indigenous to India.

Section 212c, act July 2, 1946, ch. 534, §5, 60 Stat. 417, related to definitions and allocations of quota.

Section 213, acts May 26, 1924, ch. 190, §13, 43 Stat. 161; June 13, 1930, ch. 476, 46 Stat. 581; May 14, 1937, ch. 182, §2, 50 Stat. 165; Aug. 9, 1946, ch. 945, §1, 60 Stat. 975, related to compliance with immigration requirements.

Section 213a, act May 14, 1937, ch. 182, §3, 50 Stat. 165, related to deportation of alien securing visa through fraudulent marriage.

Section 214, act May 26, 1924, ch. 190, §14, 43 Stat. 162, related to deportation and procedure thereunder.

Section 215, acts May 26, 1924, ch. 190, §15, 43 Stat. 162; July 1, 1932, ch. 363, 47 Stat. 524; July 1, 1940, ch. 502, §2, 54 Stat. 711; Dec. 29, 1945, ch. 652, title I, §7(d), 59 Stat. 672, related to admission of persons excepted from definition of immigrant and nonquota immigrants.

Section 216, acts May 26, 1924, ch. 190, §16, 43 Stat. 163; Dec. 19, 1944, ch. 608, §3, 58 Stat. 817, related to unlawful bringing of aliens into United States by water.

Section 217, act May 26, 1924, ch. 190, §17, 43 Stat. 163, related to contracts with transportation lines.

Section 218, act May 26, 1924, ch. 190, §18, 43 Stat. 164, related to unused immigration visas.

Section 219, act May 26, 1924, ch. 190, §21(a), 43 Stat. 165, related to reentry permits.
II 

Calendar No. 92 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 831 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

120 West Pike Street in Canonsburg, Pennsylvania, as the ‘‘Police Officer Scott Bashioum Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 5 (legislative day, APRIL 4), 2017 

Mr. TOOMEY (for himself and Mr. CASEY) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

MAY 17, 2017 

Reported by Mr. JOHNSON, without amendment 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 120 West Pike Street in Canonsburg, Pennsylvania, as the ‘‘Police Officer Scott Bashioum Post Office 

Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 831 RS

1 SECTION 1. POLICE OFFICER SCOTT BASHIOUM POST OF2 FICE BUILDING. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 120 West Pike Street in 

5 Canonsburg, Pennsylvania, shall be known and designated 

6 as the ‘‘Police Officer Scott Bashioum Post Office Build7 ing’’. 

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

10 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

11 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Police Officer Scott 

12 Bashioum Post Office Building’’. 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS

sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 92 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 831 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States PostScott Bashioum Post Office Building’’. Canonsburg, Pennsylvania, as the ‘‘Police Officer al Service located at 120 West Pike Street in 

MAY 17, 2017 

Reported without amendment 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 31.2

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
           PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     I, Michael Schumacher, certify that:

     1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Federal
Mortgage Corporation of Puerto Rico, Inc.

     2.   Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this quarterly report;

     3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

     4.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

          a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being
prepared;

          b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date
of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

          c)  presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
evaluation as of the Evaluation Date.

     5.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the
audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

          a)  all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for
the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

          b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
controls; and

     6.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in
this quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



Date:  February 9, 2005

 /s/ Michael Schumacher
Michael Schumacher
Treasurer, Secretary and Chief Financial Officer
15.407-5 Estimating systems. ( a ) Using an acceptable estimating system for proposal preparation benefits both the Government and the contractor by increasing the accuracy and reliability of individual proposals. Cognizant audit activities, when it is appropriate to do so, shall establish and manage regular programs for reviewing selected contractors' estimating systems or methods, in order to reduce the scope of reviews to be performed on individual proposals, expedite the negotiation process, and increase the reliability of proposals. The results of estimating system reviews shall be documented in survey reports.
( b ) The auditor shall send a copy of the estimating system survey report and a copy of the official notice of corrective action required to each contracting office and contract administration office having substantial business with that contractor. Significant deficiencies not corrected by the contractor shall be a consideration in subsequent proposal analyses and negotiations.
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit 

___________________________

No. 20-2654

___________________________

 

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee

v.

Antwan Elvago Coplen

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Southern District of Iowa - Central 

____________

Submitted: April 26, 2021

Filed: April 29, 2021

[Unpublished]

____________

Before COLLOTON, BENTON, and STRAS, Circuit Judges.

____________

 

PER CURIAM.

After considering a number of factors, the district court

1 reduced Antwan 

Coplen’s life sentence to 360 months in prison under the First Step Act. See Pub. L. 

1

The Honorable Rebecca Goodgame Ebinger, United States District Judge for 

the Southern District of Iowa.
-2- 

No. 115-391, 132 Stat. 5194 (2018). Though he challenges the decision on a host of 

grounds, we affirm.

We conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion when it declined 

to reduce Coplen’s sentence even further. See United States v. Harris, 960 F.3d 

1103, 1106 (8th Cir. 2020) (articulating the standard of review). Nor is a motion 

like this one the proper way to challenge aspects of his original sentencing. See

United States v. Moore, 963 F.3d 725, 728 (8th Cir. 2020) (explaining how motions

under the First Step Act are different from “original, plenary sentencing” 

proceedings); see also United States v. Denson, 963 F.3d 1080, 1089 (11th Cir. 

2020) (refusing to entertain an attack on the original sentence in a sentence-reduction 

proceeding under the First Step Act).

We accordingly affirm the judgment of the district court, deny the pro se 

motion, and grant counsel permission to withdraw.

______________________________
### §1381. Secretary of Labor report

Not later than January 31 of each year, the Secretary of Labor shall report to the Committees on the Judiciary of the Senate and the House of Representatives on the investigations undertaken based on—

(1) the authorities described in clauses (i) and (ii) of section 1182(n)(2)(G) of this title; and

(2) the expenditures by the Secretary of Labor described in section 1356(v)(2)(D) of this title.

(Pub. L. 108–447, div. J, title IV, §424(c), Dec. 8, 2004, 118 Stat. 3356.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the H–1B Visa Reform Act of 2004, and also as part of the L–1 Visa and H–1B Visa Reform Act and the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2005, and not as part of the Immigration and Nationality Act which comprises this chapter.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective 90 days after Dec. 8, 2004, see section 430 of Pub. L. 108–447, set out as an Effective Date of 2004 Amendment note under section 1182 of this title.
#### 1304.602-70 Federal Procurement Data System.

Departmental Federal Procurement Data System reporting procedures are set forth in CAM 1304.602.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM PRIMA
ENERGY CORPORATION'S FORM 10-K FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
1995 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                       3,977,000
<SECURITIES>                                 1,180,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,130,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (43,000)
<INVENTORY>                                    217,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             8,792,000
<PP&E>                                      48,514,000
<DEPRECIATION>                            (19,396,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              38,565,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,500,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                        58,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                  29,858,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                38,565,000
<SALES>                                     16,106,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            19,048,000
<CGS>                                       10,153,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               10,153,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              5,862,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,370,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          4,492,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 4,492,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.16
        

</TABLE>
### §2713. Administrative review of orders; petition; hearing; judicial review

(a) Any person subject to any order may file a written petition with the Secretary, stating that any such order or any provisions of such order or any obligations imposed in connection therewith is not in accordance with law and praying for a modification thereof or to be exempted therefrom. He shall thereupon be given an opportunity for a hearing upon such petition, in accordance with regulations made by the Secretary. After such hearing, the Secretary shall make a ruling upon the prayer of such petition which shall be final, if in accordance with law.

(b) The district courts of the United States in any district in which such person is an inhabitant, or has his principal place of business, are hereby vested with jurisdiction to review such ruling, provided a complaint for that purpose is filed within twenty days from the date of the entry of such ruling. Service of process in such proceedings may be had upon the Secretary by delivering to him a copy of the complaint. If the court determines that such ruling is not in accordance with law, it shall remand such proceedings to the Secretary with directions either (1) to make such ruling as the court shall determine to be in accordance with law, or (2) to take such further proceedings as, in its opinion, the law requires. The pendency of proceedings instituted pursuant to subsection (a) of this section shall not impede, hinder, or delay the United States or the Secretary from obtaining relief pursuant to section 2714(a) of this title.

(Pub. L. 93–428, §14, Oct. 1, 1974, 88 Stat. 1177.)