alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> UT
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                        1,381
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                        834
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                           2,118
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                             8
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                     174
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   4,515
<COMMON>                                             0
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                        1,013
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                               (47)
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                     966
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              147
<PREFERRED>                                         75
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                             1,153
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   1
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                        0
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                   2,174
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                    4,515
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                        4,310
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                                 9
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                       4,296
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                       4,296
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                             14
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                  53
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                      67
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            58
<NET-INCOME>                                         4
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                          3
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                        1
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                             0
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                            0
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                           (209)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00


</TABLE>
Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the

Federal Reporter or U.S.App.D.C. Reports. Users are requested to notify

the Clerk of any formal errors in order that corrections may be made

before the bound volumes go to press.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

–————

Filed October 28, 2003

No. 01–5387

BRETT C. KIMBERLIN AND DARRELL RICE,

APPELLANTS

v.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

AND BUREAU OF PRISONS,

APPELLEES

–————

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Columbia

(No. 97cv02633)

–————

On Appellants’ Petition for Rehearing

–————

Before: SENTELLE, HENDERSON, and TATEL,* Circuit Judges.

O R D E R

Upon consideration of the appellants’ petition for panel

rehearing, filed on March 28, 2003, and the appellees’ response thereto, it is

ORDERED that the petition be denied. Our panel disposition of this case remains unchanged after the United States

Supreme Court’s opinion in Overton v. Bazzetta, 123 S. Ct.

* Judge Tatel would grant the petition for panel rehearing.
2

2162 (2003). To the extent that Overton may affect our

determination that we ‘‘need not invoke the four factor analysis the United States Supreme Court established in Turner v.

Safley, 482 U.S. 78, 89, 107 S.Ct. 2254, 2261–62, 96 L.Ed.2d 64

(1987),’’ Kimberlin v. United States Dep’t of Justice, 318 F.3d

228, 232 (D.C. Cir. 2003), our alternative disposition, that the

prison regulations banning electric and electronic musical

instruments satisfy Safley’s test, remains intact, see id. at

233–34.

Per Curiam

 For the Court:

Mark J. Langer

 Clerk
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

EASTERN DIVISION

HENRY ESPEJO, individually and on behalf 

of all others similarly situated, 

Plaintiff,

v.

SANTANDER CONSUMER USA, INC., an 

Illinois corporation,

Defendant.

______________________________________

Case No.: 1:11-cv-08987

Honorable Charles P. Kocoras

Magistrate Judge Sidney I. Schenkier

FAYE LEVINS, individually and on behalf of 

all others similarly situated, 

Plaintiff,

v.

SANTANDER CONSUMER USA, INC., an 

Illinois corporation,

Defendant.

Case No.: 1:12-cv-09431

Honorable Charles P. Kocoras

Magistrate Judge Sidney I. Schenkier

NOTICE OF MOTION 

To: See attached certificate of service. 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on Thursday, April 28, 2016 at 9:30 a.m., or as soon 

thereafter as counsel may be heard, the undersigned counsel shall appear before the Honorable 

Charles P. Kocoras, or any judge sitting in his stead, in Courtroom 2325 of the United States 

Courthouse for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, 219 South Dearborn Street, 

Chicago, Illinois 60604, and then and there present Plaintiff Levins’s Motion for Class 

Certification, a true and accurate copy of which has been filed and served upon all counsel of 

record via the Court’s CM/ECF electronic filing system.
2

Respectfully submitted, 

FAYE LEVINS, individually and on behalf of all 

others similarly situated, 

Dated: April 21, 2016 By: s/ J. Dominick Larry

One of Plaintiff’s Attorneys

Jay Edelson 

jedelson@edelson.com 

Benjamin H. Richman 

brichman@edelson.com 

J. Dominick Larry 

nlarry@edelson.com 

EDELSON PC

350 North LaSalle Street, 13th Floor 

Chicago, Illinois 60654 

Tel: 312.589.6370 

Fax: 312.589.6378 

Rafey S. Balabanian 

rbalabanian@edelson.com 

EDELSON PC

329 Bryant Street, Suite 2C 

San Francisco, California 94107 

Tel: 415.234.5342 

Fax: 415.373.9435 
3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

 I hereby certify that on April 21, 2016, I served the above and foregoing by causing a true 

and accurate copy of such paper to be filed and transmitted to all counsel of record via the 

Court’s CM/ECF electronic filing system.

 s/ Rafey S. Balabanian
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of MDI, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB/A
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, J. Collier Sparks,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/
      J. Collier SparksJ.
      Collier SparksPrincipal
      Executive OfficerApril
      24, 2008
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 12

     THE BURLINGTON NORTHERN AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY and SUBSIDIARIES
               COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                      (In Millions, Except Ratio Amounts)
                                  (Unaudited)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                             Six Months Ended
                                                                  June 30,
                                                     ------------------------------------

                                                          1999                 1998
                                                     -------------        ---------------
<S>                                                  <C>                   <C>
Earnings:

  Pre-tax income                                           $  815                 $  919

  Add:
    Interest and fixed charges,
      excluding capitalized interest                          151                    141

    Portion of rent under long-term
      operating leases representative
      of an interest factor                                    93                     94

    Amortization of capitalized interest                        2                      2

  Less:  Undistributed equity in earnings
             of investments accounted for
             under the equity method                            9                      8
                                                     ------------        ---------------

  Total earnings available for fixed charges               $1,052                 $1,148
                                                     ============        ===============

Fixed charges:

  Interest and fixed charges                               $  157                 $  148

  Portion of rent under long-term operating
    leases representative of an interest factor                93                     94
                                                     ------------        ---------------

  Total fixed charges                                      $  250                 $  242
                                                    =============        ===============

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                          4.21x (1)              4.74x (2)
</TABLE>

(1)  Earnings for the six months ended June 30, 1999 include pre-tax special
     items of $48 million and $37 million for reorganization costs and
     environmental expenses, respectively, partially offset by a $54 million
     credit for the reversal of liabilities associated with the consolidation of
     certain clerical work-forces. Excluding the special items, the ratio for
     the six months ended June 30, 1999 would have been 4.33x.

(2)  Earnings for the six months ended June 30, 1998 include a pre-tax gain on
     the pipeline partnerships sale of $67 million.  Excluding this gain, the
     ratio for the three months ended June 30, 1998 would have been 4.47x.
(January 23, 1979)

#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Barry Pierce, Petitioner, v E. L. Milonas, Respondent.

— Application in the nature of a writ of prohibition pursuant to CPLR article 78 dismissed as moot, without *648costs and without disbursements. No opinion. Concur — Birns, J. P., Silver-man, Evans, Fein and Markewich, JJ.
#### Myron C. Gelrod v. American Casualty Company of Reading, Pennsylvania.

Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied, with $10 costs. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, McNally and Stevens, JJ.
#### 1252.239-81 Cloud Identification and Authentication (Organizational Users) Multi-Factor Authentication.

As prescribed in 1239.7204(f), insert the following clause:

# Cloud Identification and Authentication (Organizational Users) Multi-Factor Authentication (NOV 2022)

The Contractor shall support a secure, multi-factor method of remote authentication and authorization to identified Government Administrators that will allow Government-designated personnel the ability to perform management duties on the system. The Contractor shall support multi-factor authentication in accordance with National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Federal Information Processing Standards (FIPS) Publication (PUB) Number 201-2, Personal Identity Verification (PIV) of Federal Employees and Contractors, and OMB implementation guidance for personal identity verification.

(End of clause)
Case: 1:12-cv-00456 Document #: 5 Filed: 01/24/12 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:19
Case: 1:12-cv-00456 Document #: 5 Filed: 01/24/12 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:20
From: <Alicea.Jezebele@epamail.epa.gov> To: <rrburger@cmsenergy.com> Date: 7/22/2010 9:55 AM Subject: TES Filer City Station - Plant ID 04170 - Request for extension to complete Questionnaire Attachments: pic26386.gif

Greetings, EPA has reviewed your extension requ est for the steam electric effluent guidelines questionnaire for the TES Filer City Station. The deadline for your plant to submit Version 2 of the completed questionnaire is extended to October 15, 2010. If you need assistance during the completion of the steam electric questionnaire, please contact the steam electric helpline via e-mail at steamhelp@erg.com or by phone at 1-877-353-7560. Sincerely, (Embedded image moved to file: pic26386.gif)

Good afternoon: On behalf of the TES Filer City Station - Plant ID 04170 we are requesting an extension to complete the Questionnaire for the Steam Electric Power Generating Effluent Guidelines. Filer City received Version 2: Coal and Petroleum Coke - OMB Control Number: 2040-0281 on Friday, June 18, 2010 at 3:30 p.m. eastern daylight time. Filer City has very limited staff and no designated person for water issues. We are currently involved in completing the Section 114 Testing required by the Air Division of EPA, undergoing an audit by the Reliability First Corporation fo r NERC (North American Electric Reliability Corporation), preparing for a performance review required by our power purchase agreement, preparing for a health and safety audit, and have a new plant manager. We will probably work with a consultant on this project which will require acclimation and orientation, plus a lengthy review of documentation. We appreciate your review and consideration and review of this request and sincerely hope you can grant us additional time. If you have any questions, please feel to contact me. Thank you very much. Roger R. Burger Plant Manager T.E.S. Filer City Station (231) 723-6573 Ext. 102 (231) 723-4766 fax (231) 690-0308 mobile rrburger@cmsenergy.com
EION KELLY,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D15-1615

_____________________________/

Opinion filed July 2, 2015.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Columbia County.

Wesley R. Douglas, Judge.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public 

Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROWE, SWANSON, and BILBREY, JJ., CONCUR.
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

ParentsHELP MY CHILD READ
| Editor's Picks                                                                |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                    |
|                                                                                    | |							 1 |							2 |							3 |							4 |							5 | |  |
|                                                                                    |
| 1 - 10 of 57 Shown			Articles per page  				10 | 				25  | 				50 |
#### 1415.305 Proposal evaluation.

The CCO is authorized to make the determination to reject all proposals.
U.S. Department of Education 

Negotiated Rulemaking 

1990 K Street, N.W., 8th Floor Conference Center 

Washington, D.C. 

Team II – School-Based Loan Issues 

February 25, 2009, 1:00 p.m. – 5:00 p.m. 

February 26 & 27, 2009, 9:00 a.m. – 5:00 p.m. 

Agenda*

Welcome 

Introductions

Overview of the Negotiated Rulemaking Process 

Review and Adopt Protocols 

Petitions for Membership 

Overview of the School-Based Loan Issues 

Review Agenda of Issues to be Negotiated 

Workshop-Style Review of Issues 

1. Required Disclosures for Covered Entities 

2. Program Participation Agreement (PPA): Code of Conduct 

3. Disclosures of Reimbursements for Service on Advisory Boards 

4. PPA: Private Education Loan Certification 

5. Information and Dissemination Activities 

6. Exit Counseling 

7. PPA: Preferred Lender Lists 

8. Cohort Default Rate Calculation, Institutional Eligibility, and Default Prevention 

Plans 

9. Entrance Counseling 

10. Direct Loan Borrower Disclosures 

 

* Time will be made available for public comment during the meeting. 

2/17/2009 
11. Mandatory Assignment of Defaulted Loans 

12. Expansion of Teacher, Head Start, and Law Enforcement Cancellation Categories 

13. Addition of New Public Service Cancellation Categories 

14. Military Service Cancellation 

Logistics 

Schedule of future meetings 

Identify additional information needs

Next Steps 

Draft Regulatory Text 

Agenda for Meeting 2: April 1 – 3, 2009 

Meeting Summary 

Other

2/17/2009
1516.303-72 Policy. ( a ) The Agency shall use cost-sharing contracts where the principal purpose is ultimate commercialization and utilization of technologies by the private sector. There should also be a reasonable expectation of future economic benefits for the contractor and the Government beyond the Government's contract.
( b ) Cost-sharing may be accomplished by a contribution to either direct or indirect costs, provided such costs are reasonable, allocable and allowable in accordance with the cost principles of the contract. Allowable costs which are absorbed by the contractor as its share of contract costs may not be charged directly or indirectly to the Agency or the Federal Government.
( c ) Unsolicited proposals will be considered on a case-by-case basis by the Contracting Officer as to the appropriateness of cost-sharing.
[61 FR 14504, Apr. 2, 1996]
EXHIBIT 3.3
                                
                                
                                
                     AMENDMENT TO THE BYLAWS
                                
                  INDEPENDENT BANKSHARES, INC.
                                
                         MARCH 17, 1999
                                
                                
     The Bylaws of the Corporation are amended by adding thereto
new Sections 1(c) and 1(d) to Article III thereof, to read in
their entirety, as follows:

     (c)  No person shall be eligible to be newly elected or
          appointed, or to continue to serve, as a director of the
          corporation after reaching 75 years of age; provided, however,
          that any person who was a director on March 17, 1999, and was
          older than age 70 at such date shall be eligible to be elected
          and appointed, and to continue to serve, as a director of the
          corporation until such person reaches age 80. As soon as a
          person's eligibility to continue to serve as a director of the
          corporation terminates because of such person's age, such person
          shall immediately be deemed to have retired and resigned as a
          director without further action by such person or the
          corporation's board of directors or shareholders.
          
     (d)  Any director, following mandatory retirement as a director
          because of the age limitations contained in Section 1(c) of this
          Article, may, at the discretion of the board of directors, be
          elected by the directors as an advisory director (including a
          director emeritus) of the corporation.  An advisory director
          shall have the right to attend and participate in meetings of the
          board of directors, and to receive such compensation in
          connection therewith as the board may approve from time to time,
          but shall not have the right to vote and shall not be counted in
          determining a quorum.  Advisory directors shall serve at the
          pleasure of the board of directors until their earlier death,
          resignation or removal (with or without cause) by the board of
          directors.

<PAGE>
From: OM Information Quality 

To: Robyn Bitner 

Cc: Arrington, Angela; Axt, Kathy 

Subject: RE: Information Quality Request 

Date: Monday, September 10, 2018 3:53:39 PM 

Thank you for your request. It has been forwarded to the Office of Postsecondary Education for 

review. A response to your concerns will be provided as part of the department’s response under 

the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking. Your request will be posted to Regulations.gov in the associated 

docket for this rule. Therefore, this request is not considered a proper request under the 

Information Quality Act. 

If there are any further questions, please let us know. 

Stephanie Valentine 

245-7356 

From: Robyn Bitner [mailto:robyn@nsldn.org]

Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2018 11:27 AM

To: OM Information Quality; OMInformationQualityRequests@ed.gov

Subject: Information Quality Request 

Attached please find a Petition for Correction and Disclosure under the Information Quality Act. 

Sincerely, 

Robyn K. Bitner | Counsel 

National Student Legal Defense Network 

1015 15th Street NW, Suite 600 | Washington, D.C. 20005 

robyn@nsldn.org | www.nsldn.org 

*Member of New York Bar; practicing under the supervision of organization principals while D.C. Bar application is 

pending.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 831 Referred in House (RFH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 831

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 14, 2017

      Referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 120 West Pike Street in Canonsburg, Pennsylvania, as the ``Police 
             Officer Scott Bashioum Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. POLICE OFFICER SCOTT BASHIOUM POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 120 West Pike Street in Canonsburg, Pennsylvania, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Police Officer Scott Bashioum Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Police 
Officer Scott Bashioum Post Office Building''.

            Passed the Senate June 13, 2017.

            Attest:

                                                JULIE E. ADAMS,

                                                             Secretary.
```
OFFICIAL NOTICE FROM COURT OF CRIMINAL APf>E P.Ql,BPXJ.23i98, CAPITOL SXATJtONrAUSTiyr.; 

### OFFICIAL BUSINESS

-- 

### STATE @FTEH PEMALTY FOR 

### 12/15/2014PRIVATEUSE 

## LOPEZ, DAVID REY tryCt.ct^oJ'^9&^ On this day, the application forr11 07 Writ of Habeas Corpus has been received 

### and presented to the Court. *»>. "c^":t Abel Acosta, Clerk **?ECS8&

DAVID REY LOPEZ

riEBHSB 77002 02 1R 0002003152 DEC22 2014 MAILED FROM Zly^f^Qjr.1?g3*>|L04