alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §1440e. Exemption from naturalization fees for aliens naturalized through service during Vietnam hostilities or other subsequent period of military hostilities; report by clerks of courts to Attorney General

Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no clerk of a United States court shall charge or collect a naturalization fee from an alien who has served in the military, air, or naval forces of the United States during a period beginning February 28, 1961, and ending on the date designated by the President by Executive order as the date of termination of the Vietnam hostilities, or thereafter during any other period which the President by Executive order shall designate as a period in which Armed Forces of the United States are or were engaged in military operations involving armed conflict with a hostile foreign force, and who is applying for naturalization during such periods under section 329 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, as amended by this Act [8 U.S.C. 1440], for filing a petition for naturalization or issuing a certificate of naturalization upon his admission to citizenship, and no clerk of any State court shall charge or collect any fee for such services unless the laws of the State require such charge to be made, in which case nothing more than the portion of the fee required to be paid to the State shall be charged or collected. A report of all transactions under this section shall be made to the Attorney General as in the case of other reports required of clerks of courts by title III of the Immigration and Nationality Act [8 U.S.C. 1401 et seq.].

(Pub. L. 90–633, §3, Oct. 24, 1968, 82 Stat. 1344.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Immigration and Nationality Act, referred to in text, is act June 27, 1952, ch. 477, 66 Stat. 163. Title III of the Act is classified principally to subchapter III (§1401 et seq.) of this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1101 of this title and Tables.

#### Codification

Section was not enacted as part of the Immigration and Nationality Act which comprises this chapter.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Abolition of Immigration and Naturalization Service and Transfer of Functions

For abolition of Immigration and Naturalization Service, transfer of functions, and treatment of related references, see note set out under section 1551 of this title.
#### Katherine C. McAbee, Respondent, v. Melvin R. Keen, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant. Gervas Canning Company, Inc., Third-Party Defendant.

Order of May 2, 1963, insofar as it grants plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment unanimously reversed and motion denied, and the judgment entered thereon on July 10, 1963 vacated, and otherwise the order is affirmed, with costs to defendant Keen. Memorandum: There are material issues of fact which preclude the granting of summary judgment. One question is whether the plaintiff succeeded to all of the rights of the bank which was a holder in due course, or whether *she*took *the note in*question subject to the equities between the original parties. These matters should be explored and determined at a trial. (Appeal from judgment of Chautauqua Special Term in favor of plaintiff in an action on a promissory note; the order granted motion for summary judgment.) Present—■ Williams, P. J., Bastow, Henry, Noonan and Del Vecchio, JJ.
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-18-00292-CR

Ronnie White Jr.

v.

The State of Texas

On Appeal from the

24th District Court of De Witt County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 17-11-12,792

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

July 18, 2019
(May 16, 1962)

#### Far Hills Theatres, Inc., v. Evelyn Lambert et al.

Motion for a stay denied. Concur—Rabin, J. P., Valente, McNally, Stevens and Eager, JJ.
### §4308. Referendum; necessity, etc.

(a) The Secretary shall conduct a referendum among domestic producers and importers not exempt under section 4311 of this title who, during a representative period determined by the Secretary, have been engaged in the production or importation of flowers and plants, for the purpose of ascertaining whether the issuance of an order is approved or favored by such domestic producers and importers. No order issued pursuant to this chapter shall be effective unless the Secretary determines that the issuance of such order is approved or favored by not less than two-thirds of the producers and importers voting in such referendum, or by a majority of the producers and importers voting in such referendum if such majority produced and imported not less than two-thirds of the total value of the flowers and plants produced and imported by those producers and importers voting in such referendum during a representative period defined by the Secretary.

(b) The Secretary shall be reimbursed from assessments for all costs incurred by the Government in connection with the conduct of the referendum, except for the salaries of Government employees.

(Pub. L. 97–98, title XVII, §1709, Dec. 22, 1981, 95 Stat. 1354.)
Exhibit
23(a)











Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm








We
consent to the incorporation by reference in PPL Corporation's Registration
Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-116478, 333-116478-01, 333-116478-02,
333-85716, 333-85716-01, 333-85716-02, 333-106200, 333-106200-01, 333-132574,
333-132574-01, 333-132574-02, and 333-132574-03), the Registration Statements on
Form S-3D (Nos. 333-128543 and 333-102845), and the Registration Statements on
Form S-8 (Nos. 333-02003, 333-112453, 333-110372, 333-95967 and 333-144047) of
our reports dated February 27, 2009, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements and schedule of PPL Corporation and the effectiveness of internal
control over financial reporting of PPL Corporation, included in this Annual
Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2008.






/s/ Ernst
& Young LLP


Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania


February
27, 2009
Fiscal Year 2017 Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies - UTAH

FY 2017 Title I

LEA ID District Allocation*

4900030 Alpine School District 9,979,668

4900060 Beaver School District 163,936

4900090 Box Elder School District 1,231,081

4900120 Cache School District 1,882,892

4900142 Canyons School District 3,593,644

4900150 Carbon School District 719,046

4900180 Daggett School District 18,947

4900210 Davis School District 7,438,511

4900240 Duchesne School District 462,153

4900270 Emery School District 298,015

4900300 Garfield School District 135,637

4900330 Grand School District 336,143

4900360 Granite School District 16,073,242

4900390 Iron School District 2,241,013

4900420 Jordan School District 4,115,056

4900450 Juab School District 319,249

4900480 Kane School District 179,398

4900510 Logan School District 2,062,861

4900540 Millard School District 520,780

4900570 Morgan School District 70,715

4900600 Murray School District 849,467

4900630 Nebo School District 3,345,462

4900660 North Sanpete School District 475,999

4900690 North Summit School District 112,358

4900720 Ogden School District 4,529,187

4900750 Park City School District 303,983

4900780 Piute School District 80,885

4900810 Provo School District 3,736,245

4900840 Rich School District 44,127

4900870 Salt Lake City School District 6,652,711

4900900 San Juan School District 1,068,401

4900930 Sevier School District 758,208

4900960 South Sanpete School District 518,398

4900990 South Summit School District 69,656

4901020 Tintic School District 28,359

4901050 Tooele School District 1,250,286

4901080 Uintah School District 814,381

4901110 Wasatch School District 502,519

4901140 Washington School District 6,814,803

4901170 Wayne School District 132,695

4901200 Weber School District 3,223,603

4999999 PART D SUBPART 2 0

* Actual amounts received by LEAs will be smaller than shown here due to State-level adjustments to Federal Title I allocations. States adjust

 allocations, for example, to reflect LEA boundary changes or the creation of new LEAs, including charter school LEAs, that are not accounted

 for in the statutory calculations. States also are permitted to reserve, for administration, up to 1 percent of the allocations they would receive

 if $14 billion were appropriated and generally must reserve 7 percent of their allocations for school improvement. These 

 adjustments will reduce the actual amounts available.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1


                           SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY

Following is a list of the Company's subsidiaries:

                                          Organized       Percent of
                                          Under           Voting Securities
Name                                      the Laws of     Owned by Registrant
----                                      -----------     -------------------

1240 Campbell Corp. (formerly Intelect
    Network Technologies Company)         Nevada          100%
Intelect Visual Communications Corp.      Delaware        100%
DNA Enterprises, Inc.                     Texas           100%
TeraForce Ventures, Inc.                  Delaware        100%
Centauri Netsystems Corporation           Delaware        100%
Aegean Networks, Incorporated             Delaware        100%
DNA Computing Solutions, Inc.             Delaware        100%
Intelect Technologies, Inc.               Delaware         33%
### §8202. Eligibility

#### (a) Loss

Subject to subsection (b), the Secretary shall provide assistance under section 8203 of this title to eligible orchardists that planted trees for commercial purposes but lost the trees as a result of a natural disaster, as determined by the Secretary.

#### (b) Limitation

An eligible orchardist shall qualify for assistance under subsection (a) only if the tree mortality of the eligible orchardist, as a result of damaging weather or related condition, exceeds 15 percent (adjusted for normal mortality).

(Pub. L. 107–171, title X, §10202, May 13, 2002, 116 Stat. 490.)
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Esterline Technologies Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended May 1, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-Q), I, Robert W. Cremin, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)     The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)     The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.





|                    |  |  |  |     |  |                                                                 
|------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: June 4, 2009 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Robert W. Cremin                                            
|                    |  |  |  |     |  | Robert W. Cremin Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
Order Form (01/2005)

United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois

Name of Assigned Judge

or Magistrate Judge

Charles P. Kocoras Sitting Judge if Other

than Assigned Judge

CASE NUMBER 11 C 8987 DATE 4/25/2013

CASE

TITLE

Espejo vs. Santander Consumer USA

DOCKET ENTRY TEXT

Motion hearing held on 4/25/2013. D. Frank Davis and the law firm of Davis & Norris, LLP's motion (Doc [47])

for leave to withdraw as Class Counsel ONLY, is granted. Their appearances as counsel will remain and

continue as counsel for named plaintiffs Faye Levins, Rejeeni Cook, Turquiose Williams and Maude Jones.

Docketing to mail notices.

00:02

 Courtroom Deputy

Initials:

SCT

11C8987 Espejo vs. Santander Consumer USA Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>



                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Emerson Radio Corp., (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003, filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission , Geoffrey P. Jurick, Chief Executive Officer, and
Kenneth A. Corby, Chief Financial Officer, of the Company each hereby certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates
presented and the consolidated result of operations of the Company for the
periods presented.

Dated: November 14, 2003

                                   By: /s/ Geoffrey P. Jurick
                                       ------------------------
                                   Geoffrey P. Jurick
                                   Chief Executive Officer

                                   By: /s/ Kenneth A. Corby
                                       ------------------------
                                   Executive Vice President and
                                   Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter
63 of Title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form
10-Q or as a separate disclosure document.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Emerson Radio Corp. and will be
retained by Emerson Radio Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Company's Balance Sheet as of September 30, 1998 and the Statement Of Income 
for the year ended September 30, 1998, and is qualified in its entirety by 
refenence to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         406,302 
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,740,403<F1>
<PP&E>                                      39,000,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              36,029,309
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,711,904    
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,272,237
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,438,857    
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,711,904
<SALES>                                      4,514,063<F2>
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,579,868<F3>
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,753,414<F4>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,826,454
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,826,454
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,826,454
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   856.50<F5>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   856.50<F5>
<FN>
<F1>Includes prepaid rent
<F2>Rental income
<F3>Includes dividend income
<F4>Leasehold rent, supervisory fees, legal fees and amortization of
    leasehold
<F5>Earnings per $10,000 participation unit, based on 3,300 participation 
    units outstanding during the year
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
(October 27, 1960)

#### Frank Made Sportswear, Inc. v. Charles W. Carvin Co., Inc.

Application denied, with $10 costs. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, Valente, McNally and Bastow, JJ.
#### § 516.11 Service of criminal process outside the United States.

Army Regulation 630-10 and international treaties, such as status of forces agreements, govern the service of criminal process of foreign courts and the surrender of soldiers to foreign civilian law enforcement officials.
400 MARYLAND AVE. S.W., WASHINGTON, DC 20202-2600

www.ed.gov

The Department of Education’s mission is to promote student achievement and preparation for global competitiveness

by fostering educational excellence and ensuring equal access.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES

May 4, 2023

Honorable Mike Morath

Commissioner

Texas Education Agency 1701 N. Congress Ave.

Austin, Texas 78701 

Dear Commissioner Morath:

As you know, the U.S. Department of Education’s Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP)

conducted an onsite meeting with Texas Education Agency (TEA) staff on February 13th and 

14th, 2023, to discuss and review the evidence submitted as required by the Specific Conditions 

imposed on the State’s FY 2022 Individual with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) grant award, 

dated July 1, 2022.

A copy of OSEP’s July 1, 2022, Specific Conditions letter is available at 

https://www2.ed.gov/fund/data/award/idea/2022partb/tx-2022b-letter.enclosures.pdf.

While onsite, TEA staff presented information and provided updates to OSEP on the State's 

general supervision, oversight, and monitoring systems as required by the IDEA sections 

612(a)(11) and 616(a)(1)(C) and their implementing regulations at 34 C.F.R. §§ 300.149 and 

300.600. TEA also provided updates regarding the implementation of the child find (34 C.F.R.

§300.111) and free and appropriate education (FAPE) (34 C.F.R. §300.101) requirements. 

Additionally, OSEP met with stakeholders and staff from districts across the State and received 

their input on the State's progress in meeting the requirements identified above. While onsite, it 

came to our attention that Austin Independent School District (AISD), specifically its special 

education department, had been under investigation by TEA for more than one year, due to the 

district's years-long backlog of special education evaluations, as required by the child find and 

evaluations requirements (34 C.F.R. §§ 300.301-306). 

Considering this information, OSEP requests that within 30-days of the date of this letter TEA 

provide OSEP with a status report on the backlog of evaluations in AISD, as well as its plan for 

bringing AISD into compliance with IDEA and its implementing requirements.  OSEP will 

schedule a call in the future to discuss these concerns in more detail. 
Page 2 – Honorable Mike Morath

We appreciate your prompt attention to this critical issue and await your response to this letter. If 

you have any questions, please contact Jennifer Finch, your State Lead, at 

Jennifer.Finch@ed.gov.

Sincerely,

Valerie C. Williams

Director

Office of Special Education Programs

cc: Justin Porter

 State Director of Special Education
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

**2019:**Federal  Campus-Based Programs Data Book 2019

**2018:**Federal Campus-Based Programs Data Book 2018

**2017:**Federal Campus-Based Programs Data Book 2017

**2016:**Federal Campus-Based Programs Data Book 2016

**2015:**Federal Campus-Based Programs Data Book 2015

**2014:**Federal Campus-Based Programs Data Book 2014

**2013:**Federal Campus-Based Programs Data Book 2013

**2012:**Federal Campus-Based Programs Data Book 2012

**2011:**Federal Campus-Based Programs Data Book 2011

**2010:**Federal Campus-Based Programs Data Book 2010

**2009:**Federal Campus-Based Programs Data Book 2009

**2008:**Federal Campus-Based Programs Data Book 2008

**2007:**Federal Campus-Based Programs Data Book 2007

**2006:**Federal Campus-Based Programs Data Book 2006

**2005:**Federal Campus-Based Programs Data Book 2005

**2004:**Federal Campus-Based Programs Data Book 2004

**2003:**Federal Campus-Based Programs Data Book 2003

**2002:**Federal Campus-Based Programs Data Book 2002

**2001:**Federal Campus-Based Programs Data Book 2001

**2000:**Federal Campus-Based Programs Data Book 2000

**1999:**Federal Campus-Based Programs Data Book 1999

For additional information contact donald.conner@ed.gov
Top

OPE Program Data | OPE Policy Page
   Printable view  Last Modified: 01/24/2020How Do I Find...- Student loans, forgiveness
- Higher Education Rulemaking
- College accreditation
- Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
- FERPA
- FAFSA
- 1098, tax forms

More >
Information About...- Elevating Teaching
- Early Learning
- Engage Every Student
- Unlocking Career Success
- Cybersecurity

 
*Our mission* is to promote student achievement and preparation for global competitiveness by fostering educational excellence and ensuring equal access.
Student Loans
Repaying LoansDefaulted LoansLoan ForgivenessLoan Servicers
Grants & Programs
Apply for Pell GrantsGrants ForecastApply for a Grant
Laws & Guidance
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)FERPACivil RightsNew IDEA Website
Data & Research
Education StatisticsPostsecondary Education DataED Data ExpressNation's Report CardWhat Works ClearinghouseOpen Data PlatformCOVID Relief Data
About Us
Contact UsED OfficesJobsPress ReleasesFAQsRecursos en españolBudget, PerformancePrivacy Program- Notices
- FOIA
- Privacy Policy
- Accessibility
- Security
- Information quality
- Inspector General
- Whitehouse.gov
- USA.gov
- Benefits.gov
- Regulations.gov
- vote.gov