alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>


                                                                      EXHIBIT 32


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Environmental Tectonics
Corporation (the "Company") for the fiscal quarter ended August 29, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, William F. Mitchell, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.


                                      /s/ William F. Mitchell
                                      -----------------------------------
                                      William F. Mitchell
                                      Chief Executive Officer


                                      /s/ Duane D. Deaner
                                      -----------------------------------
                                      Duane D. Deaner
                                      Chief Financial Officer

                                      October 14, 2003


         This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed to be filed by the Company for purpose
of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Fiscal Year 2013 Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies - DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

FY 2013 Title I

LEA ID District Allocation*

1100030 District of Columbia Public Schools 44,013,016

1199999 PART D SUBPART 2 0

* Actual amounts received by LEAs will be smaller than shown here due to State-level adjustments to Federal Title I allocations. States adjust

 allocations, for example, to reflect LEA boundary changes or the creation of new LEAs, including charter school LEAs, that are not accounted

 for in the statutory calculations. States also are permitted to reserve, for administration, up to 1 percent of the allocations they would receive

 if $14 billion were appropriated and generally must reserve 4 percent in fiscal year 2013 for school improvement activities. These 

 adjustments will reduce the actual amounts available.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsReusable Reentry Satellite (RRS): Launch tradeoff studyA goal of the Phase B study is to define the launch system interfaces for the reusable reentry satellite (RRS) program. The focus of the launch tradeoff study, documented in this report, is to determine which expendable launch vehicles (ELV's) are best suited for the RRS application by understanding the impact of all viable launch systems on RRS design and operation.Document ID19930006614Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateMarch 1, 1990Subject CategorySpacecraft Design, Testing And PerformanceReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.26:186395NASA-CR-186395RRS-021Accession Number93N15803Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS9-18202Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19930006614.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### CALDWELL et al., Respondents, v. LABAREE et al., Appellants.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

October 16, 1903.)

Action by Howard Caldwell and others against J. Walter Labaree and others.

No opinion. Motion denied, upon payment of $10 costs, and, upon payment of an additional $10, leave given to apply to the court below to open default.
Case: 1:12-cv-01422 Document #: 63 Filed: 05/06/13 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:234
Case: 1:12-cv-01422 Document #: 63 Filed: 05/06/13 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:235
#### 14.407-1 General.

After the opening of bids, contracting officers shall examine all bids for mistakes. In cases of apparent mistakes and in cases where the contracting officer has reason to believe that a mistake may have been made, the contracting officer shall request from the bidder a verification of the bid, calling attention to the suspected mistake. If the bidder alleges a mistake, the matter shall be processed in accordance with this section 14.407. Such actions shall be taken before award.

[48 FR 42171, Sept. 19, 1983. Redesignated and amended at 60 FR 34738, July 3, 1995]
#### 13.000 Scope of part.

This part prescribes policies and procedures for the acquisition of supplies and services, including construction, research and development, commercial products, and commercial services, the aggregate amount of which does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (see 2.101). Subpart 13.5 provides special authority for acquisitions of commercial products and commercial services exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold but not exceeding $7.5 million ($15 million for acquisitions as described in 13.500(c)), including options. See part 12 for policies applicable to the acquisition of commercial items exceeding the micro-purchase threshold. See 36.602-5 for simplified procedures to be used when acquiring architect-engineer services.

[62 FR 64917, Dec. 9, 1997, as amended at 69 FR 8313, Feb. 23, 2004; 69 FR 76351, Dec. 20, 2004; 71 FR 57366, Sept. 28, 2006; 75 FR 53132, Aug. 30, 2010; 80 FR 38297, 38311, July 2, 2015; 85 FR 62488, Oct. 2, 2020; 86 FR 61025, Nov. 4, 2021]
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-6981

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

DAMON EMANUEL ELLIOTT,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. 

Peter J. Messitte, Senior District Judge. (8:97-cr-00053-PJM-1)

Submitted: September 22, 2020 Decided: September 25, 2020

Before NIEMEYER, KEENAN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Damon Emanuel Elliott, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Damon Emanuel Elliott seeks to appeal the district court’s orders returning his 

pleadings seeking to dismiss the indictment and for further information concerning motions 

under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 and 28 U.S.C. § 2244. We have reviewed the orders and Elliott’s 

informal brief and supplemental brief and find no error. Accordingly, we affirm. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process. 

AFFIRMED
#### 1352.219-71 Notification to delay performance (Deviation).

As prescribed in 48 CFR 1319.811-3(b), insert the following clause:

# Notification To Delay Performance (Deviation) (APR 2010)

The contractor shall not begin performance under this purchase order until 2 working days have passed from the date of its receipt. Unless the contractor receives notification from the Small Business Administration that it is ineligible for this 8(a) award, or otherwise receives instructions from the Contracting Officer, performance under this purchase order may begin on the third working day following receipt of the purchase order. If a determination of ineligibility is issued within the 2-day period, the purchase order shall be considered cancelled.

(End of clause)

[75 FR 10570, Mar. 8, 2010; 75 FR 14496, Mar. 26, 2010]
#### Giulio Ciccarello, Appellant, v. Irving Rubin et al., Respondents.

In a negligence action to recover damages for injury to person and property, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the ¡Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered January 14, 1963 upon a jury’s verdict in -the plaintiff’s favor for $1,018.83 after an assessment of damages as directed by a prior *888order of the court granting plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff contends that the amount of the verdict is inadequate. Judgment reversed on the law and the facts, with costs to plaintiff, and new trial granted, unless, within 30 days after entry of the order hereon, defendants shall serve and file a written stipulation consenting to increase the verdict from $1,018.83 to $5,000 and to a modification of the judgment accordingly. In the event such stipulation he served and filed, then the judgment as thus increased and modified is affirmed, without costs. In our opinion, under all the circumstances, the amount of the jury’s verdict was inadequate at least to the extent indicated. Beldock, P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Hill and Rabin, JJ., concur.
### §7317. Personnel matters

#### (a) Compensation

Each member of the Commission shall serve without compensation, but shall be allowed travel expenses including per diem in lieu of subsistence, as authorized by section 5703 of title 5, when engaged in the performance of Commission duties.

#### (b) Staff

#### (1) Appointment

The Commission shall appoint a staff director, who shall be paid at a rate not to exceed the maximum rate of basic pay under section 5376 of title 5, and such professional and clerical personnel as may be reasonable and necessary to enable the Commission to carry out its duties under this subchapter without regard to the provisions of title 5 governing appointments in the competitive service, and without regard to the provisions of chapter 51 and subchapter III of chapter 53 of such title, or any other provision of law, relating to the number, classification, and General Schedule rates.

#### (2) Limitation on compensation

No employee appointed under this subsection (other than the staff director) may be compensated at a rate to exceed the maximum rate applicable to level GS–15 of the General Schedule.

#### (c) Detailed personnel

On the request of the chairperson of the Commission, the head of any department or agency of the Federal Government is authorized to detail, without reimbursement, any personnel of the department or agency to the Commission to assist the Commission in carrying out its duties under this section. The detail of any individual may not result in the interruption or loss of civil service status or other privilege of the individual.

(Pub. L. 104–127, title I, §187, Apr. 4, 1996, 110 Stat. 941.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The General Schedule, referred to in subsec. (b), is set out under section 5332 of Title 5.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### References to Maximum Rate Under 5 U.S.C. 5376

For reference to maximum rate under section 5376 of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees, see section 2(d)(3) of Pub. L. 110–372, set out as an Effective Date of 2008 Amendment note under section 5376 of Title 5.
EXHIBIT 31.2

**         CERTIFICATIONS**

I, Robert D. George,certify that: 

1.              I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Esterline          Technologies Corporation; 

2.              Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a          material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements          made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not          misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. 

3.              Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information          included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial          condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and          for, the periods presented in this report. 

4.              The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for          establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in          Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
### §6514. Accreditation program

#### (a) In general

The Secretary shall establish and implement a program to accredit a governing State official, and any private person, that meets the requirements of this section as a certifying agent for the purpose of certifying a farm or handling operation as a certified organic farm or handling operation.

#### (b) Requirements

To be accredited as a certifying agent under this section, a governing State official or private person shall—

(1) prepare and submit, to the Secretary, an application for such accreditation;

(2) have sufficient expertise in organic farming and handling techniques as determined by the Secretary; and

(3) comply with the requirements of this section and section 6515 of this title.

#### (c) Additional documentation and verification

The Secretary, acting through the Deputy Administrator of the national organic program established under this chapter, has the authority, and shall grant a certifying agent the authority, to require producers and handlers to provide additional documentation or verification before granting a certification under section 6503 of this title, in the case of a compliance risk with respect to meeting the national standards for organic production established under section 6504 of this title, as determined by the Secretary or the certifying agent.

#### (d) Accreditation of foreign organic certification program

#### (1) In general

For an agricultural product being imported into the United States to be represented as organically produced, the Secretary shall require the agricultural product to be accompanied by a complete and valid national organic import certificate, which shall be available as an electronic record.

#### (2) Tracking system

#### (A) In general

The Secretary shall establish a system to track national organic import certificates.

#### (B) Integration

In establishing the system under subparagraph (A), the Secretary may integrate the system into any existing information tracking systems for imports of agricultural products.

#### (e) Duration of accreditation

An accreditation made under this section—

(1) subject to paragraph (2), shall be for a period of not more than 5 years, as determined appropriate by the Secretary;

(2) in the case of a certifying agent operating in a foreign country, shall be for a period of time that is consistent with the certification of a domestic certifying agent, as determined appropriate by the Secretary; and

(3) may be renewed.

(Pub. L. 101–624, title XXI, §2115, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 3944; Pub. L. 115–334, title X, §10104(c), Dec. 20, 2018, 132 Stat. 4900.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Subsecs. (c) to (e). Pub. L. 115–334 added subsecs. (c) to (e) and struck out former subsec. (c). Prior to amendment, text of subsec. (c) read as follows: "An accreditation made under this section shall be for a period of not to exceed 5 years, as determined appropriate by the Secretary, and may be renewed."
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATIONPURSUANTTO 18U.S.C.SECTION1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF


THESARBANES-OXLEYACTOF2002





In
connection with the Composite Technology Corporation (the "Company") Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Benton
H Wilcoxon, Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to


Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/ Benton H WilcoxonBenton
      H WilcoxonChief
      Executive Officer(Principal Executive
Officer)





Date:December 23,2008
PUBLIC LAW 110–207—APR. 30, 2008 122 STAT. 719 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 1119: 

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 110–428 (Comm. on the Judiciary). 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD: 

Vol. 153 (2007): Nov. 6, considered and passed House. 

Vol. 154 (2008): Apr. 14, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 110–207 

110th Congress 

An Act 

To amend title 36, United States Code, to revise the congressional charter of 

the Military Order of the Purple Heart of the United States of America, Incorporated, to authorize associate membership in the corporation for the spouse 

and siblings of a recipient of the Purple Heart medal. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Purple Heart Family Equity 

Act of 2007’’. 

SEC. 2. ASSOCIATE MEMBERSHIP IN THE MILITARY ORDER OF THE 

PURPLE HEART OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

INCORPORATED. 

Section 140503(b) of title 36, United States Code, is amended 

by striking ‘‘parents and lineal descendants’’ and inserting ‘‘the 

parents, spouse, siblings, and lineal descendants’’. 

Approved April 30, 2008. 

Purple Heart 

Family Equity 

Act of 2007. 

36 USC 101 note. 

Apr. 30, 2008 

[H.R. 1119] 


dkrause on GSDDPC29 with PUBLIC LAWS
### §222. Federal Trade Commission powers adopted for enforcement of chapter

For the efficient execution of the provisions of this chapter, and in order to provide information for the use of Congress, the provisions (including penalties) of sections 46 and 48 to 50 of title 15, are made applicable to the jurisdiction, powers, and duties of the Secretary in enforcing the provisions of this chapter and to any person subject to the provisions of this chapter, whether or not a corporation. The Secretary, in person or by such agents as he may designate, may prosecute any inquiry necessary to his duties under this chapter in any part of the United States.

(Aug. 15, 1921, ch. 64, title IV, §402, 42 Stat. 168; Aug. 15, 1921, ch. 64, title V, §503, as added Aug. 14, 1935, ch. 532, 49 Stat. 649.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1935—Act Aug. 15, 1921, §503, as added Aug. 14, 1935, purported to insert "or any live poultry dealer or handler" after "packer" but word "packer" does not appear in this section.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

Executive and administrative functions of Federal Trade Commission, with certain reservations, transferred to Chairman of such Commission by 1950 Reorg. Plan No. 8, §1, eff. May 24, 1950, 15 F.R. 3175, 64 Stat. 1264, set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.
#### 1415.404 Proposal analysis.
#### LISSNER v. DOCHTERMANN et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.

January 17, 1906.)

Judgment—Modification—Time of Motion.

Under Municipal Court Act, Laws 1902, p. 1563, c. 580, § 254, requiring a motion to amend or modify a judgment to be made within five days after the rendition of the* judgment, a motion for an order to amend a judgment by striking therefrom an allowance of costs, when not made until more than five days after the rendition of judgment, comes too late.

[Ed. Note.—For cases in point, see vol. 30, Cent. Dig. Judgment, § 619.J

*231” Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan,. Fifth District.

Action by Henry Lissner against Charles Dochtermann and others. From an order amending a judgment, defendants appeal.

Reversed.

Argued before SCOTT, P. J., and BLANCHARD, and DOWL-ING, JJ.

George Freifeld and S. C. Steinhardt, for appellants.

Maurice H. Gotlieb, for respondent.

BLANCHARD, J.

This is an appeal by the defendants from an order amending the judgment in favor of the defendants by striking therefrom the allowance of $30 for costs and disbursements. The- motion for the order appealed from was made more than five days after the judgment was rendered, and according to section 254 of the municipal court act (Laws 1902, p. 1563, c. 580), was too late. Buchsbaum v. Feldman, 43 Misc. Rep. 85, 86 N. Y. Supp. 747.

Order reversed, with costs to appellant. All concur.
EXHIBIT 32.1
           Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18
             U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
                        of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with this quarterly report of Espey Mfg. & Electronics  Corp. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period  ended  March 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof,  I, Howard  Pinsley,
President and Chief Executive  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

      1.    The report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The  information  contained in this report fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

Date: May 16, 2005


                                                         /s/Howard Pinsley
                                                         -----------------------
                                                         Howard Pinsley
                                                         President and
                                                         Chief Executive Officer


                                       15