alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §1752. Staffing levels at ports of entry

The Immigration and Naturalization Service shall staff ports of entry at such levels that would be adequate to meet traffic flow and inspection time objectives efficiently without compromising the safety and security of the United States. Estimated staffing levels under workforce models for the Immigration and Naturalization Service shall be based on the goal of providing immigration services described in section 1356(g) of this title within 45 minutes of a passenger's presentation for inspection.

(Pub. L. 107–173, title IV, §403(b), May 14, 2002, 116 Stat. 559.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Abolition of Immigration and Naturalization Service and Transfer of Functions

For abolition of Immigration and Naturalization Service, transfer of functions, and treatment of related references, see note set out under section 1551 of this title.
U.S. Department of Education

Negotiated Rulemaking Public Hearing

May 23, 2013

Minneapolis, MN

1 Moriah Miles & Shannon Glenn State Chair of the Minnesota State University Student Association

2 Laura Hoffman Former University of Minnesota Student

3 Michael Rosen, Ph.D. Economic Department, Milwaukee Area Technical College (MATC) , 

and President, American Federation of Teachers Local 212

4 Dan Solomon Field Representative, Senator Al Franken

5 C. Todd Jones President and General Counsel, Association of Independent Colleges 

and Universities of Ohio

6 Brian Dailey-Arndt Vice Chair, Board of Directors of the Minnesota Public Interest 

Research Group

7 Tricia Grimes Manager, State Financial Aid Programs, Minnesota Office of Higher 

Education

8 Bill Norwood Chief Architect, Heartland Campus Solutions

9 Jeanne Herrmann Chief Operations Officer, Globe University

10 Caroline Palmer Staff Attorney, Minnesota Coalition Against Sexual Assault

11 A. Kate Bothun Juris Doctor Candidate, Hamline University School of Law

12 David Schejbal Dean, Continuing Education, Outreach and E-Learning, University of 

Wisconsin-Extension

13 Laura M. Pollastrini Government & Public Relations Manager - Central Administration, 

Northwestern College

14 Assistant Attorney General 

Jason Pleggenkuhle

Minnesota Attorney General's Office

15 Melissa Rubio IIRON Student Network

16 Weili Zheng IIRON Student Network

17 Mansi Kathuria IIRON Student Network

18 Kevin Shi IIRON Student Network

19 Bing Li IIRON Student Network

20 Lilly Osborne IIRON Student Network

21 Aneesh Nandam IIRON Student Network

22 Deborah Bushway Chief Academic Officer, Capella University

23 Samuel Levine Assistant Attorney General in Illinois

24 Colleen Bisher-Fry Assistant Attorney General in Illinois

25 Matt Forstie Minnesota Student Legislative Coalition
In the Missouri Court of Appeals

Eastern District

OCTOBER 27, 2015

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 

84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

1. ED101393 JUANITA MCKEE, APP V HONEYWELL SECURITY, RES

2. ED101618 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V THEODIS HOLMES, APP

3. ED101662 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V RONALD MILLS, APP

4. ED101845 SHARON M. BROOKS, APP V ROBERT BROOKS, RES

5. ED102195 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V LONNIE BROWN, APP

6. ED102604 DAVID GERMAINE WHITE, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, 

RES
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Catherine Coffey, Respondent, v Shop-Rite Supermarkets North, Appellant. Workers’ Compensation Board, Respondent.

[833 NYS2d 308]—

Crew III, J.

Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed January 30, 2006, which ruled that claimant was excused from providing timely written notice of her accident pursuant to Workers’ Compensation Law § 18.

On December 20, 2004, claimant sustained an injury to her right hip when she slipped and fell on a wet floor mat at her *1007place of work. Thereafter, on or about April 9, 2005, claimant filed a written report of the incident and her resulting injury. A hearing ensued, at the conclusion of which a Workers’ Compensation Law Judge established claimant’s case for a work-related injury and set an average weekly wage. Upon review, a panel of the Workers’ Compensation Board affirmed, finding that claimant was excused from giving timely written notice of her accident in accordance with the terms of Workers’ Compensation Law § 18. This appeal by the employer ensued.

We affirm. To be sure, Workers’ Compensation Law § 18 requires a claimant to provide his or her employer with written notice of a work-related injury within 30 days of the underlying accident *(see*Workers’ Compensation Law § 18; *Matter of Baker v E.J. Constr. Group, Inc.,*26 AD3d 652 [2006]). Failure to tender the required notice, however, may be excused if, insofar as is relevant to the instant appeal, the employer or its agent had actual knowledge of the accident *(see*Workers’ Compensation Law § 18; *Matter of Miner v Cayuga Correctional Facility,*14 AD3d 784, 785 [2005]).

Here, there is no dispute that claimant did not provide the employer with written notice of her accident within the 30-day period. The record plainly reflects, however, that claimant’s accident was witnessed by a coworker, who immediately notified the employer’s assistant manager. The assistant manager, in turn, responded by helping claimant up off the floor and onto a nearby bench. Later that day, claimant advised the assistant manager and another coworker that she was “hurting bad” and, therefore, would be leaving work early. When questioned at the hearing as to whether she subsequently spoke with someone in a managerial position about the underlying accident, claimant testified that she spoke with the employer’s manager, who had observed her limping, at some point in January 2005, at which time they specifically discussed her December 2004 fall, the fact that she was limping and the pain that she was experiencing. Thus, the Board found that claimant was excused from providing timely written notice of her accident because the employer had actual knowledge thereof. Under the circumstances presented here, we are unable to discern any basis upon which to disturb that finding. In light of this conclusion, the employer’s remaining contentions are either academic or lacking in merit.

Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Feters and Carpinello, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
#### In the Matter of Marie M. La Guardia et al., Individually and as Members of the Board of Directors of the Park Association of New York City, Inc., Appellants, against City of New York et al., Respondents.

Order unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondents. No opinion. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Valente, McNally, Stevens and Bastow, JJ. [22 Misc 2d 340.]
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

MEMORANDUM ORDER

Appellate case name: Clifford K. Phillips v. Barbara J. Copeland

Appellate case number: 01-12-00492-CV

Trial court case number: 617651

Trial court: 412th Judicial District Court of Brazoria County, Texas

On May 8, 2012, appellant, Clifford K. Phillips, filed an affidavit of indigence in the trial 

court in the above-referenced matter, and no contest to the affidavit of indigence was filed or 

sustained. See TEX. R. APP. P. 20.1(a)(2), (f). Accordingly, it is ORDERED that appellant is 

allowed to proceed on appeal without advance payment of appellate costs and that the Clerk of 

this Court shall make an entry in her records to that effect.1

A clerk’s record complying with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 34.5(a) has been 

filed in this Court. 

It is ORDERED that Court Reporter file with this Court, within 30 days of the date of 

this order and at no cost to appellant, the reporter’s record.

Appellant’s brief is ORDERED filed with this Court within 30 days of the date the 

complete reporter’s record is filed in this Court. Appellee’s brief, if any, must be filed 30 days 

of the date appellant’s brief is filed.

It is so ORDERED.

 1 Because appellant’s claim is governed by Chapter 14 of the Civil Practice & Remedies 

Code, appellant does not need to meet the requirements of Section 13.003 of the Civil 

Practice & Remedies Code in order to be entitled to a free record on appeal. See TEX.

CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 13.003 (listing requirements for appellant to be entitled 

to a free record on appeal) (West 2002), § 13.004 (Chapter 13 does not apply to claims 

governed by Chapter 14) (West 2002); see generally TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE Ch.

14 (West 2002) (governing inmate litigation).
Judge’s signature: /s/ Justice Rebeca Huddle

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: August 2, 2012
#### 1352.213-70 Evaluation utilizing simplified acquisition procedures.

As prescribed in 48 CFR 1313.106-2-70, insert the following provision:

# Evaluation Utilizing Simplified Acquisition Procedures (Date)

The Government will issue an order resulting from this request for quotation to the responsible offeror whose quotation results in the best value to the Government, considering both price and non-price factors. The following factors will be used to evaluate quotations:

[This section is to be tailored to conform to individual procurements. Text is provided as an example only. Stating relative importance of the evaluation factors is not required.]

(1) Personnel Qualifications. The experience, education, and qualifications of personnel proposed to work on the contract will be evaluated to determine their ability to perform their proposed duties.

(2) Technical Approach and Capability. The offeror's approach to performing contract requirements and its capability to successfully perform the contract will be evaluated.

(3) Past Performance. The offeror's past performance on related contracts will be evaluated to determine, as appropriate, successful performance of contract requirements, quality and timeliness of delivery of goods and services, cost management, communications between contracting parties, proactive management and customer satisfaction.

(4) Price.

(End of clause)
#### 1403.203 Reporting suspected violations of the Gratuities clause.

When suspected violations of the clause at FAR 52.203-3, Gratuities, become known to a Federal Government employee, the matter shall be reported, in writing, to the cognizant CO or the CO's supervisor, as appropriate. The report shall clearly state the alleged circumstances surrounding the incident or incidents in which the contractor offered or gave a gratuity to a Federal Government employee and intended to obtain a contract or favorable treatment under a contract because of the gratuity. The date(s), location(s) and name(s) of all parties involved in the incident shall be included in the report.
From: <Alicea.Jezebele@epamail.epa.gov>

To: <rrburger@cmsenergy.com>

Date: 7/22/2010 9:55 AM

Subject: TES Filer City Station - Plant ID 04170 - Request for extension to complete 

Questionnaire

Attachments: pic26386.gif

Greetings,

EPA has reviewed your extension request for the steam electric effluent

guidelines questionnaire for the TES Filer City Station. The deadline

for your plant to submit Version 2 of the completed questionnaire is

extended to October 15, 2010.

If you need assistance during the completion of the steam electric

questionnaire, please contact the steam electric helpline via e-mail at

steamhelp@erg.com or by phone at 1-877-353-7560.

Sincerely,

(Embedded image moved to file: pic26386.gif)

 Good afternoon:

 On behalf of the TES Filer City Station - Plant ID 04170 we are

 requesting an extension to complete the Questionnaire for the Steam

 Electric Power Generating Effluent Guidelines. Filer City received

 Version 2: Coal and Petroleum Coke - OMB Control Number: 2040-0281 on

 Friday, June 18, 2010 at 3:30 p.m. eastern daylight time.

 Filer City has very limited staff and no designated person for water

 issues. We are currently involved in completing the Section 114

 Testing required by the Air Division of EPA, undergoing an audit by the

 Reliability First Corporation for NERC (North American Electric

 Reliability Corporation), preparing for a performance review required

 by our power purchase agreement, preparing for a health and safety

 audit, and have a new plant manager. We will probably work with a

 consultant on this project which will require acclimation and

 orientation, plus a lengthy review of documentation.

 We appreciate your review and consideration and review of this request

 and sincerely hope you can grant us additional time.

 If you have any questions, please feel to contact me.

 Thank you very much.

 Roger R. Burger

 Plant Manager

 T.E.S. Filer City Station

 (231) 723-6573 Ext. 102

 (231) 723-4766 fax

 (231) 690-0308 mobile

 rrburger@cmsenergy.com
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

 Respondent

 v.

RONALD LEE SUBER,

 Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 85 WAL 2015

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 27th day of May, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED.
The students who complete a program during AY 2015 will be in the normal cohort (2YP) of students that is used to calculate the D/E rates for AY 2018.  Transition rates would be calculated for the intervening AYs: 2015, 2016, and 2017 (shaded).

For failing and zone programs, ED would calculate transition D/E rates for the first 3 years of official rates.
Exhibit 32.2

                         CERTIFICATION OF VICE PRESIDENT
                FEDERAL MORTGAGE CORPORATION OF PUERTO RICO, INC.
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Federal Mortgage Corporation of
Puerto Rico, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30,
2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Peter Porath, Vice President of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



 /s/ Peter Porath
-----------------------------
Peter Porath
Vice President
August 18, 2006



                                       13
1403.204 Treatment of violations. ( a ) The CO will provide the contractor with a formal notice that summarizes the events involving the suspected violation and affords the contractor the opportunity to take the action(s) listed under FAR 3.204(b). The notice shall contain a time limit for reply and shall be sent by certified mail return receipt requested. The CO will submit the report, additional documentary evidence and other pertinent information to the HCA for disposition with a recommended course of action. A copy of this submission must also be sent to the Deputy Assistant Inspector General for Investigations. In consultation with the SOL and the OIG, and based on the results of any further discussion with the contractor, its counsel or witnesses, the HCA may make a recommendation to the Director, PAM, pursuant to FAR 3.204(c) and shall provide formal notice to the contractor of such recommendation.
( b ) If the decision involves the termination of a contract (see FAR 3.204(c)(1)), the CO will be responsible for implementing the decision.
MEMORANDUM 

DATE: July 7, 2014

TO: Carbon Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR–2013-0602

FROM: EPA Region 1

SUBJECT: June 26, 2014, Meeting with Connecticut State Staff Regarding Proposed Carbon 

Power Plan for Existing Power Plants

SUMMARY

A meeting was held between EPA and the attendees listed below on June 26, 2014 to 

discuss the proposed Carbon Power Plan for Existing Power Plants. Discussion covered 

Connecticut’s state goal calculations, including data sources and assumptions. 

ATTENDEES (all by phone)

Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection: 

Anne Gobin

Wendy Jacobs

Jaimeson Sinclair

EPA: 

Brian Fisher

Jenny Noonan

Michael Cohen

Denise Mulholland

Cynthia Greene

Shutsu Wong

Dave Conroy

Bob McConnell
#### 1452.280-1 Notice of Indian Small Business Economic Enterprise set-aside.

As prescribed in 1480.503(e)(1), and in lieu of the requirements of FAR 19.508, insert the following provision in each written solicitation of offers to provide supplies, general services, A-E services, or construction. If the solicitation is oral, information substantially identical to that contained in the provision must be given to potential offerors.

Notice of Indian Small Business Economic Enterprise Set-Aside (FEB 2021)

Under the Buy Indian Act, 25 U.S.C. 47, offers are solicited only from Indian Economic Enterprises (Subpart 1480.8) that are also small business concerns. Any acquisition resulting from this solicitation will be from such a concern. Offers received from enterprises that are not both Indian Economic Enterprises and small business concerns will not be considered and will be rejected.

(End of provision)

[87 FR 20764, Apr. 8, 2022]
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 12**  **- 7**  **4 0**  **3**

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , P laintiff

- Appellee ,
v. ERIC JUNIOR HOLLOWELL, S R
. , Defendant

- Appell ant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Norfolk
. Rebecca Beach Smith , Chief District Judge. ( 2:08

- cr - 00076

- RBS

- JEB

- 1 )

Submitted : November 2 , 2012 Decided: November 6 , 2012

Before WILKINSON , KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges
.
Affirm ed by un published per curiam opinion
.
Eric Junior Hollowell, Sr. , Appellant Pro Se. Sherrie Scott Ca potosto, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Eric Junior Hollowell, Sr. appeals the district court’s order construing his successive 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for sentence reduction as a motion for reconsideration, and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v
. Hollowell , No. 2:08

- cr - 00076

- RBS

- JEB

- 1 (E.D. Va. July 25, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRME D
EXHIBIT
32












CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18
U.S.C.


SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002





This
certification set forth below is hereby made solely for the purposes of
satisfying the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 and may not be relied upon or used for any other purposes.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Access Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and will be retained by Access Pharmaceuticals,
Inc. and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon its request.





Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Public Company Accounting Reform and Investor Act of 2002
(18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted, the “Sarbanes-Oxley Act”), Jeffrey B. Davis, Chief
Executive Officer of Access Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the "Company"), and Stephen
B. Thompson, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each
hereby certifies that to his knowledge the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the
period ended December 31, 2008 of the Company filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report") fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for
the period specified.





Signed at
the City of  Dallas, in the State of Texas, this 31st day of March,
2009.








/s/ Jeffrey B.
Davis                                                          /s/ Stephen B.
Thompson


Jeffrey
B.
Davis                                                                                                           Stephen
B. Thompson


Chief
Executive
Officer                                                                                              Chief Financial
Officer
Exhibit 32
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

We hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Form 10-Q of Reliability Incorporated (the "Issuer") for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2003 (the "Periodic Report"):





|1. | fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                 
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Issuer.





|/s/ Larry Edwards
Larry Edwards
Chief Executive Officer
November 5, 2003 | /s/ Carl V. Schmidt
Carl V. Schmidt
Chief Financial Officer
November 5, 2003
|------------------------------------------------------------------------ | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------



25
Case: 1:12-cv-01477 Document #: 13 Filed: 04/17/12 Page 1 of 9 PageID #:60
Case: 1:12-cv-01477 Document #: 13 Filed: 04/17/12 Page 2 of 9 PageID #:61
Case: 1:12-cv-01477 Document #: 13 Filed: 04/17/12 Page 3 of 9 PageID #:62
Case: 1:12-cv-01477 Document #: 13 Filed: 04/17/12 Page 4 of 9 PageID #:63
Case: 1:12-cv-01477 Document #: 13 Filed: 04/17/12 Page 5 of 9 PageID #:64
Case: 1:12-cv-01477 Document #: 13 Filed: 04/17/12 Page 6 of 9 PageID #:65
Case: 1:12-cv-01477 Document #: 13 Filed: 04/17/12 Page 7 of 9 PageID #:66
Case: 1:12-cv-01477 Document #: 13 Filed: 04/17/12 Page 8 of 9 PageID #:67
Case: 1:12-cv-01477 Document #: 13 Filed: 04/17/12 Page 9 of 9 PageID #:68