alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 5.0.3

Eastern Division

ArrivalStar S.A., et al.

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:12−cv−00773

Honorable Joan B. Gottschall

BrightSky LLC, et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Friday, April 6, 2012:

 MINUTE entry before Honorable Joan B. Gottschall: Pursuant to Notice of

Voluntary Dismissal of all Defendants [10], this action is dismissed pursuant to the terms

stated therein. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice(rj, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:12-cv-00773 Document #: 11 Filed: 04/06/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:303
#### 1303.806 Processing suspected violations.

Suspected violations of 31 U.S.C. 1352 shall be referred to the DOC Office of Inspector General and the Senior Procurement Executive.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                              OCT-1-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         399,423
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  817,258
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,221,201
<PP&E>                                      22,897,835
<DEPRECIATION>                              13,700,007
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,526,745
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          653,779
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        67,785
<OTHER-SE>                                   8,147,181
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,526,745
<SALES>                                      5,944,018
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,016,168
<CGS>                                          991,789
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,373,185
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             117,375
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,533,819
<INCOME-TAX>                                   513,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,020,819
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,020,819
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.98
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.98
        

</TABLE>
#### § 536.99 Claims not payable under the National Guard Claims Act.

The provisions of § 536.76 apply to claims arising under this subpart.
1836.203 Government estimate of construction costs.(NASA supplements paragraph (c)) ( c ) ( i ) If the acquisition is by sealed bidding, the contracting officer shall file a sealed copy of the detailed Government estimate with the bids until bid opening. After the bids are read and recorded, the contracting officer shall read the estimate, and record it in the same detail as the bids.
( ii ) If the acquisition is by negotiation, the contracting officer may disclose the overall amount of the Government estimate after award upon request of offerors.
### §349. "State" defined

The term "State" means the States of the Union, Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam and the Northern Mariana Islands.

(May 8, 1914, ch. 79, §10, as added Pub. L. 87–749, §1(i), Oct. 5, 1962, 76 Stat. 745; amended Pub. L. 92–318, title V, §506(h), June 23, 1972, 86 Stat. 351; Pub. L. 99–396, §9(f), Aug. 27, 1986, 100 Stat. 840.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1986—Pub. L. 99–396 amended section generally, expanding definition of "State" to include the Northern Mariana Islands.

1972—Pub. L. 92–318 inserted reference to Virgin Islands and Guam.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1972 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 92–318 effective after June 30, 1970, see section 506(n) of Pub. L. 92–318, set out as a note under section 326a of this title.
M. P. No. 74-334.

#### Brier Manufacturing Company *v.*John H. Norberg, *Tax Administrator.*

*Isadore Paisner,*for petitioner. *Julius C. Michaelson,*Attorney General, *George H. Egan,*Special Asst. Attorney General, *Perry Shatkin,*Chief Legal Officer (Taxation), for respondent.

Petition for writ of certiorari is granted, and the writ may issue forthwith. The instant case is consolidated for the filing of briefs and hearing with the case of *Brier Mfg. Co.*v. *Norberg,*114 R. I. 923, 332 A.2d 784. (1975).

Paolino and Joslin, *JJ.*not participating.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

November 25, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

137201 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, 

Justices 

v SC: 137201 

 COA: 277571 

Kalamazoo CC: 06-002077-FH 

CLAXTON JOHNSON, JR.,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 31, 2008 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

1117 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

November 25, 2008 

 Clerk
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23
 
                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
 
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements of
General Re Corporation and Subsidiaries on Form S-8 (File Numbers 2-62106,
275489, 33-60867, 33-6483 and 33-33102) of our report, dated February 6, 1996,
on our audits of the consolidated financial statements and financial statement
schedules of General Re Corporation and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 1995 and
1994 and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1995,
which is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
 
                                          COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.
 
New York, New York
March 15, 1996
17.504 Reporting requirements. ( a ) The senior procurement executive for each executive agency shall submit to the Director of OMB an annual report on interagency acquisitions, as directed by OMB.
( b ) The contracting officer for the servicing agency shall ensure that service contractor reporting requirements are met in accordance with subpart 4.17, Service Contracts Inventory.
[78 FR 80375, Dec. 31, 2013]
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 84 Reported in Senate (RS)]

<DOC>

                                                         Calendar No. 2
115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 84

  To provide for an exception to a limitation against appointment of 
   persons as Secretary of Defense within seven years of relief from 
   active duty as a regular commissioned officer of the Armed Forces.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 10, 2017

  Mr. McCain introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
              referred to the Committee on Armed Services

                            January 12, 2017

               Reported by Mr. McCain, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To provide for an exception to a limitation against appointment of 
   persons as Secretary of Defense within seven years of relief from 
   active duty as a regular commissioned officer of the Armed Forces.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXCEPTION TO LIMITATION AGAINST APPOINTMENT OF PERSONS AS 
              SECRETARY OF DEFENSE WITHIN SEVEN YEARS OF RELIEF FROM 
              ACTIVE DUTY AS REGULAR COMMISSIONED OFFICERS OF THE ARMED 
              FORCES.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding the second sentence of section 
113(a) of title 10, United States Code, the first person appointed, by 
and with the advice and consent of the Senate, as Secretary of Defense 
after the date of the enactment of this Act may be a person who is, on 
the date of appointment, within seven years after relief, but not 
within three years after relief, from active duty as a commissioned 
officer of a regular component of the Armed Forces.
    (b) Limited Exception.--This section applies only to the first 
person appointed as Secretary of Defense as described in subsection (a) 
after the date of the enactment of this Act, and to no other person.
                                                         Calendar No. 2

115th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                 S. 84

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

  To provide for an exception to a limitation against appointment of 
   persons as Secretary of Defense within seven years of relief from 
   active duty as a regular commissioned officer of the Armed Forces.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            January 12, 2017

                       Reported without amendment
```
### S10-100901-O ; 

### TOLED O REGIONA L Chambe ro fGjmmenoe 300 Madiso

nAve. , Ste . 200 Toledo , Ohi o 43604-157 5 419.243.819 1 phon e 419.241.8302 fa x www.toledcchamber.co m Augus t 25 , 201 0 Th e Honorabl e RayLaHoo d Secretaryo fTransportatio n § 3 U.S . Departmen t o fTransportatio n ^ ,:.;.., ; 40 0 7tt i Street , S.W. , Washingto n D.C . 2059 0 ^ i-: ^ ^: ^ ^ Dea rSecretaryLaHood : ^ o ^O ^ Th e Toled o Express Airpor t ha s suffere d fro m a significan t declin e i n its ai rservic e ov#th e :^^— < pas t decade . Airlin e capacit ya t Toled o Express i s dow n 66 % fro m 200 2 an d th e nunabe r^'^ ^ o fairline s servin g th e communit yi s dow n fro m si xt o three . Z . ^^~ ^ I n ligh t o fthi s circumstanc e th e Toled o Express Airpor t an d its communit ypartner s hav e mad e a n applicatio n fo ra Smal l Communit yAi rServic e Developmen t Progra m Grant . This Gran t woul d b e use d fo ra n aggressiv e an d extende d marlcetin g an d promotiona l campaig n t o recaptur e Toled o are a ai rtrave l deman d tha t Is no wusin g alternativ e airport s Th e Airport an d its partner s wil l matc h th e Gran t fundin g wit h a significan t loca l cas h match . Th e Airpor t ha s als o develope d a comprehensiv e ne wai rservic e incentiv e program . Includin g groun d handlin g suppor t an d startu p phas e fe e waivers . Th e combinatio n o fth e Gran t supporte d marketin g an d promotiona l fundin g an d th e Airport develope d incentiv e progra m wil l giv e Toled o th e tool s i t need s t o revers e th e leakag e o floca l ai rtrave l deman d t o othe rairport s an d re-establis h som e o fth e ai rservic e tha t ha s bee n los t i n recen t years . I urg e yo u t o giv e th e Toled o Smal l Communit yGran t Applicatio n you rfulles t consideration . Favorabl e consideratio n o fthi s Gran t applicatio n b yth e Departmen t o f Transportatio n woul d b e greatl yappreciated . Sincerel y



# ID I 

# • EPI C 

# l^ccJ , aJ'^^CJ c

Mar k A . VSoske , CA E Presiden t



## ACCREDITE D ing>glngptO|ill,lnipllln9Chn9 « ^'j - li - i f^ f f Toled o 

# (^SB a Toled o Are a Smal l Busine u Assoclatki n
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SUMMARY CONTAINS FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS OF BRIDGFORD FOODS CORPORATION FOR THE TWENTY-SIX WEEKS ENDED APRIL
30, 1999, AS SET FORTH IN THSI FORM 10-Q FOR SUCH PERIOD, AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-29-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1999
<CASH>                                      28,211,578
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               10,486,829
<ALLOWANCES>                                   602,739
<INVENTORY>                                 12,811,329
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            52,811,359
<PP&E>                                      46,245,742
<DEPRECIATION>                              29,513,327
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              79,115,129
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       12,109,230
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    11,426,695
<OTHER-SE>                                  43,285,748
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                79,115,129
<SALES>                                     69,698,531
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            69,698,531
<CGS>                                       39,939,701
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               39,939,701
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            21,310,124
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                71,825
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             208,867
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              8,448,705
<INCOME-TAX>                                 3,211,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          5,237,705
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 5,237,705
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .46
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .46


</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of Alan Lebowitz (Admitted to Practice as Alan Lewis Lebowitz), an Attorney, Respondent. Joint Bar Association Grievance Committee for the Second and Eleventh Judicial Districts, Petitioner.

Second Department,

April 2, 1979

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Frank A. Finnerty, Jr. (Gary Casella*of counsel), for petitioner.

*Jerome Karp, P. C.,*for respondent.

*241OPINION OF THE COURT

*Per Curiam.*

The respondent was admitted to practice by this court on March 29, 1961 under the name of Alan Lewis Lebowitz. The Referee found the respondent guilty of participating in the sharing of legal fees with a nonlawyer as an inducement to the nonlawyer to refer criminal cases to the law firm in which respondent was a partner. Another allegation of misconduct was not sustained by the Referee.

The respondent moves to confirm the report of the Referee and the petitioner cross-moves, *inter alia,*to confirm the findings of the Referee as to the charge which was sustained and disaffirm the findings as to the charge that was not sustained.

The evidence adduced at the hearing fully supports the findings of the Referee sustaining only one charge of misconduct. Accordingly, the respondent’s motion to confirm the report is granted and the petitioner’s cross motion is granted only to the extent of confirming the one charge sustained by the Referee.

In determining an appropriate measure of discipline we have taken into consideration the mitigating circumstances advanced by respondent at the hearing. Accordingly, it is our opinion that respondent should be, and he hereby is, suspended from the practice of law for a period of one year commencing April 30, 1979 and until the further order of this court.

Hopkins, J. P., Suozzi, O’Connor, Lazer and Rabin, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                NOV-27-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                     FEB-27-1999
<CASH>                                                 4,514
<SECURITIES>                                          47,867
<RECEIVABLES>                                         21,886
<ALLOWANCES>                                           1,100
<INVENTORY>                                           29,973
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     106,712
<PP&E>                                               129,958
<DEPRECIATION>                                        90,024
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       150,718
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                 11,066
<BONDS>                                                  467
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                      0
<PREFERRED>                                                0
<COMMON>                                               1,319
<OTHER-SE>                                           130,203
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         150,718
<SALES>                                               29,007
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                      29,007
<CGS>                                                 28,761
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         28,761
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       3,875
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         100
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                        13
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      (2,486)
<INCOME-TAX>                                           (671)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  (1,815)
<DISCONTINUED>                                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                            0
<CHANGES>                                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                                         (1,815)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          (.33)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          (.33)
        


</TABLE>
# GA Volume

# Quarterly

# Historical
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.



## United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2009-5064

BANNUM, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES,

Defendant-Appellee,

and

DISMAS CHARITIES, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee.

Michael A. Gordon , Michael A. Gordon PLLC, of Wash ington, DC, argued for plaintiffappellant.

Delisa M. Sanchez , Trial Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United

States Department of Justic e, of Washington, DC, ar gued for defendant-appellee United

States. With her on the brief were Tony West , Assistant Attorney General, Jeanne E.

Davidson , Director, and Deborah A. Bynum , Assistant Director. Of counsel on the brief was

Dionis M. Gauvin , Attorney Advisor, Office of the General Counsel, Commercial Law Branch,

Federal Bureau of Prisons, of Washington, DC.

Daniel S. Herzfeld , Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP, of McLean, Virginia, argued

for defendant-appellee Dismas Charities, In c. With him on the brief were Alex D.

Tomaszczuk and Orest J. Jowyk

.

Appealed from: United States Court of Federal Claims

Senior Judge John P. WieseNOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.



## United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2009-5064

BANNUM, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES,

Defendant-Appellee,

and

DISMAS CHARITIES, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee.



## Judgment

ON APPEAL from the UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS

in CASE NO(S). 09-CV-015

This CAUSE having been hear d and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Per Curiam (LOURIE, RADER, and PROST, Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

DATED November 5, 2009 /s/ Jan Horbaly

Jan Horbaly, Clerk
### §1488. Nationality lost solely from performance of acts or fulfillment of conditions

The loss of nationality under this part shall result solely from the performance by a national of the acts or fulfillment of the conditions specified in this part.

(June 27, 1952, ch. 477, title III, ch. 3, §356, 66 Stat. 272.)
EXHIBIT 31.2

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
           PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     I, Michael Schumacher, certify that:

     1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Federal
Mortgage Corporation of Puerto Rico, Inc.

     2.   Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this quarterly report;

     3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

     4.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

          a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being
prepared;

          b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date
of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

          c)  presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
evaluation as of the Evaluation Date.

     5.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the
audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

          a)  all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for
the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

          b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
controls; and

     6.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in
this quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date:  November 12, 2004


 /s/ Michael Schumacher
Michael Schumacher
Treasurer, Secretary and Chief Financial Officer
#### 1514.201-7 Contract clauses.

The CCO is authorized to waive the inclusion of the clauses at FAR 52.214-27 and 52.214-28, in accordance with FAR 14.201-7.

[55 FR 24579, June 18, 1990, as amended at 58 FR 18976, Apr. 21, 1994]