alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NO. 07-10-00145-CR 

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

AT AMARILLO 

PANEL D 

MAY 11, 2010 

HERBERT PARMER, JR., APPELLANT 

v. 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE 

 FROM THE COUNTY COURT OF FREESTONE COUNTY; 

NO. 22436; HONORABLE LINDA K. GRANT, JUDGE 

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PIRTLE, JJ. 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Appellant Herbert Parmer, Jr. seeks to appeal a judgment convicting him of 

indecent exposure and imposing on him a sentence of 120 days jail time with credit for 

time served and court costs. The judgment included in the clerk’s record indicates 

sentence was imposed on August 10, 2009. His motion for new trial and notice of 

appeal were filed in the trial court on September 11, 2009. 
2 

 By letter, this Court informed appellant that the notice of appeal did not appear 

timely and directed him to file any documents or matters considered necessary for the 

Court to determine its appellate jurisdiction. No response has been received. 

 Our appellate jurisdiction is triggered through a timely notice of appeal. Olivo v. 

State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex.Crim.App.1996). Rule of Appellate Procedure 26.2(a) 

 requires a notice of appeal be filed within 30 days after the day sentence is imposed in 

open court, or within 90 days after imposition of the sentence if a timely motion for new 

trial is filed. The motion for new trial was not timely filed in this case. 

 The rules of appellate procedure provide for an extension of time to file the 

notice of appeal if "such notice is filed within fifteen days after the last day allowed and 

within the same period a motion is filed in the court of appeals reasonably explaining the 

need for such extension." Tex. R. App. P. 26.3. Both the notice of appeal and the 

extension motion must be filed within the time provided by the rules. See Slaton v. 

State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex.Crim.App. 1998); Olivo, 918 S.W.2d at 522. 

Appellant’s notice of appeal, filed more than thirty days after imposition of sentence in 

open court, without a motion for extension, was untimely. 

 The appropriate vehicle for seeking an out-of-time appeal is by writ of habeas 

corpus from the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals pursuant to Code of Criminal 

Procedure article 11.07. Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 11.07 (Vernon 2007); Portley 

v. State, 89 S.W.3d 188, 190 (Tex.App.—(Texarkana 2002, no pet.). Because 

appellant’s notice of appeal was untimely, this Court has no jurisdiction to take any 
3 

action but to dismiss the appeal. Slaton, 981 S.W.2d at 210; see Olivo, 918 S.W.2d at 

522. 

 Consequently, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. 

 

 

 James T. Campbell 

 Justice 

Do not publish.
### §439e. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, July 2, 1948, ch. 818, §6, 62 Stat. 1235, authorized appropriations for purposes of former sections 439 to 439e of this title, and was omitted from the Code as obsolete.
#### In the Matter of Alfonso Benavides against Robert E. Herman, as State Rent Administrator, and Eleanor M. Smith.

Motion for leave to reargue or for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals and for a stay denied, with $10 costs. The stay contained in the order to show cause, dated June 16, 1960, is vacated. Concur — ■ Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, Valente and Bastow, JJ.
17.805 Solicitation provision and contract clauses. ( a ) The contracting officer shall insert the provision at 52.217-10, Reverse Auction, in solicitations when using a reverse auction to award a contract or blanket purchase agreement.
( b ) The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 52.217-11, Reverse Auction—Orders, in solicitations and contracts for a multiple-award contract or blanket purchase agreement, when a reverse auction may be used to place orders under the basic contract or blanket purchase agreement.
( c ) The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 52.217-12, Reverse Auction Services, in all solicitations and contracts for the purchase of reverse auction services.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. William Bram, Appellant.

Motion for leave to dispense with printing granted. The appeal will be heard on the original papers (including the typed minutes) and on a typewritten brief. The appellant is directed to file six copies of his brief and to serve one copy on the District Attorney. The appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged to the February Term, beginning January 30, 1961. The appeal is ordered on the calendar for said term. Motion for assignment of counsel granted. Anthony F. Marra, Esquire, 100 Centre St., New York 13, New York, is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal. Nolan, P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur.
### SUBCHAPTER III—ATTRIBUTION OF INCOME AND AFFIDAVITS OF SUPPORT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 5.1.1

Eastern Division

Balshe LLC, et al.

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:12−cv−00966

Honorable James B. Zagel

Alan J Ross, et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Thursday, January 9, 2014:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable James B. Zagel: For the reasons stated in the

Court's Memorandum Opinion and Order, Defendants' Motion to Deny Plaintiffs' Motion

for Partial Summary Judgment and to Transfer Venue in its Entirety [63] is denied and

Plaintiffs' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment [56] is granted in part and denied in part.

Therefore, Defendants' Motion for Leave to File a Surreply [79] is moot. Enter

Memorandum Opinion and Order. Mailed notice(ep, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:12-cv-00966 Document #: 86 Filed: 01/09/14 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:808
#### 1328.102 Waiver of performance and payment bonds for contracts involving the construction, alteration, and repair of NOAA's fleet of vessels.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 782 Reported in Senate (RS)]

<DOC>

                                                       Calendar No. 122
115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 782

To reauthorize the National Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force 
                    Program, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 30, 2017

Mr. Cornyn (for himself, Mr. Blumenthal, Mr. Heller, Ms. Klobuchar, Mr. 
  Hatch, Mr. Whitehouse, Mr. Coons, Mrs. Feinstein, Mr. Grassley, Mr. 
Leahy, Mr. Tillis, Mr. Durbin, Mr. Lankford, Mr. Kennedy, and Mr. Cruz) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

                              June 8, 2017

              Reported by Mr. Grassley, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To reauthorize the National Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force 
                    Program, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Providing Resources, Officers, and 
Technology To Eradicate Cyber Threats to Our Children Act of 2017'' or 
the ``PROTECT Our Children Act of 2017''.

SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF THE NATIONAL INTERNET CRIMES AGAINST 
              CHILDREN TASK FORCE PROGRAM.

    Title I of the PROTECT Our Children Act of 2008 (42 U.S.C. 17601 et 
seq.) is amended--
            (1) in section 105(h) (42 U.S.C. 17615(h)), by striking 
        ``2016'' and inserting ``2022''; and
            (2) in section 107(a)(10) (42 U.S.C. 17617(a)(10)), by 
        striking ``fiscal year 2018'' and inserting ``each of fiscal 
        years 2018 through 2022''.
                                                       Calendar No. 122

115th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                 S. 782

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

To reauthorize the National Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force 
                    Program, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                              June 8, 2017

                       Reported without amendment
```
#### Marion Trevisano et al., Appellants, v Peninsula Hospital Center, Respondent, et al., Defendant.

— In a medical malpractice action, plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated September 27, 1978, which denied their motion to compel the defendant hospital to accept service of a súpplemental bill of particulars. Order reversed, without costs or disbursements, and motion granted. Plaintiffs’ time to serve the supplemental bill of particulars is extended until 20 days after entry of the order to be made hereon. In the circumstances disclosed, it was an abuse of discretion to deny the plaintiffs’ motion. Damiani, J. P., Titone, Shapiro and Margett, JJ., concur.
1601.102 Authority. ( a ) The FEHBAR is issued by the Director of the Office of Personnel Management in accordance with the authority of 5 U.S.C. chapter 89 and other applicable law and regulation.
( b ) The FEHBAR does not replace or incorporate regulations found at 5 CFR part 890, which provides the substantive policy guidance for administration of the FEHBP under 5 U.S.C. Chapter 89. The following is the order of precedence in interpreting a contract provision under the FEHBP: ( 1 ) 5 U.S.C. Chapter 89;
( 2 ) 5 CFR part 890;
( 3 ) 48 CFR Chapters 1 and 16;
( 4 ) The FEHBP contract.
[52 FR 16037, May 1, 1987, as amended at 59 FR 14764, Mar. 30, 1994]
December 16, 1974.

M. P. No. 74-21.

#### City of Cranston *v.*Alfred Carpionato *et al.*

Motion of Rose Montaquila to substitute her as a party respondent in place of the deceased John Montaquila, both in her individual capacity and in her capacity as executrix of the *910estate of John Montaquila, is granted.

*Peter Palombo, Jr.,*City Solicitor, for petitioner. *Hinckley, Allen, Salisbury & Parsons, Stephen J. Carlotti,*for respondent Rose Montaquila.

Paolino, J. not participating.
Appendix C: Wieland. Smoke from Two Neighboring Outdoor Wood Boilers, Central 

Boiler models CL6048 and HF60 

January 29, 2010 

January 9, 2010 
December 16, 2009 

December 29, 2009 
December 11, 2009 

December 6, 2009 

November 16, 2009 
November 8, 2009 

November 3, 2009 

October 14, 2009 
September 20, 2009 

September 9, 2009 

August 5, 2009 
July 3, 2009 

June 13, 2009 

May 10, 2009 
April 12, 2009 

April 11, 2009 
March 28, 2009 

March 9, 2009 

February 23, 2009 
February 20, 2009 
February 17, 2009 

February 4, 2009 
January 30, 2009 

January 26, 2009 
January 20, 2009 

January 16, 2009 

January 10, 2009 
December 12, 2008 

November 29, 2008 
November 26, 2008 

November 25, 2008 

November 2, 2008 
October 29, 2008 

September 9, 2008 

September 5, 2008 
August 5, 2008 

July 23, 2008 

June 20, 2008 
May 27, 2008 

May 6, 2008 

April 14, 2008 

April 2, 2008 
March 28, 2008 

March 20, 2008 
March 10, 2008 

March 6, 2008 
March 6, 2008 
March 6, 2008 

November 9, 2007 

September 28, 2007 

September 15, 2007 
April 19, 2007 

February 20, 2007 
January 25, 2007 

December 10, 2006 
November 20, 2006 

October 29, 2006 
August 20, 2006
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002

I, Raymond F. Lancy, Chief Financial
Officer of Bridgford Foods Corporation (the Company), certify, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

| | (1) |  | the Quarterly Report
      on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended January 23,
      2009 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
      or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 780(d));
      and
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    
| | (2) |  | the information
      contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
      financial condition and results of operations of the Company.                                                                                                            
| |    

|Dated: March 9,
      2009 | /s/ Raymond F. Lancy                            | 
|-------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------- | 
|                           | Raymond F. Lancy, Chief
      Financial Officer | 
|                           | (Principal Financial Officer)                  

24

---
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Alfredo Gracias, Appellant.

Judgment of conviction unanimously affirmed. No opinion. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, 'Tálente, Stevens and Eager, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 11 (Tuesday, January 19, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 5177]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-01038]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural 
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

    Docket Numbers: RP21-377-000.
    Applicants: Gas Transmission Northwest LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing Report of Refunds--Coyote Springs 
Lateral IT Revenue (Nov 2019-Oct 2020).
    Filed Date: 1/8/21.
    Accession Number: 20210108-5216
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/21/21.


    Docket Numbers: RP21-378-000.
    Applicants: Carolina Gas Transmission, LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing 2020 Interruptible Revenue Sharing 
Report.
    Filed Date: 1/11/21.
    Accession Number: 20210111-5118.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/25/21.

    Docket Numbers: RP21-379-000.
    Applicants: Maritimes & Northeast Pipeline, L.L.C.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Maritimes & Northeast 
Pipeline, L.L.C RCA Modifications to be effective 3/1/2021.
    Filed Date: 1/11/21.
    Accession Number: 20210111-5166.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/25/21.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system 
(https://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/search/fercgensearch.asp) by querying 
the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above 
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00 
p.m. Eastern time on the specified date. Protests may be considered, 
but intervention is necessary to become a party to the proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing 
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying 
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call (866) 208-3676 
(toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated: January 12, 2021.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-01038 Filed 1-15-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
#### Matilda D. Hume, Appellant, v. Michael A. C. Hume et al., Respondents.

Motion by appellant for a stay of execution of judgment, pending the appeal therefrom, granted, on condition that appellant perfect the appeal and be ready to argue or submit it at the February Term, beginning January 30, 1961. The appeal is ordered on the calendar for said term. The record and appellant’s brief must be served and filed on or before January 16, 1961. Motion by appellant to dispense with printing denied, with leave to renew on proper papers. Cross motion by respondent Michael A. C. Hume for reimbursement of expenses denied, without prejudice to such other proceedings as said respondent may be advised. Beldock, Acting P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Pette, JJ., concur.
15.402 Pricing policy. Contracting officers shall— ( a ) Purchase supplies and services from responsible sources at fair and reasonable prices. In establishing the reasonableness of the offered prices, the contracting officer— ( 1 ) Shall obtain certified cost or pricing data when required by 15.403-4, along with data other than certified cost or pricing data as necessary to establish a fair and reasonable price; or
( 2 ) When certified cost or pricing data are not required by 15.403-4, shall obtain data other than certified cost or pricing data as necessary to establish a fair and reasonable price, generally using the following order of preference in determining the type of data required: ( i ) No additional data from the offeror, if the price is based on adequate price competition, except as provided by 15.403-3(b).
( ii ) Data other than certified cost or pricing data such as— ( A ) Data related to prices (*e.g.,* established catalog or market prices, sales to non-governmental and governmental entities), relying first on data available within the Government; second, on data obtained from sources other than the offeror; and, if necessary, on data obtained from the offeror. When obtaining data from the offeror is necessary, unless an exception under 15.403-1(b)(1) or (2) applies, such data submitted by the offeror shall include, at a minimum, appropriate data on the prices at which the same or similar items have been sold previously, adequate for evaluating the reasonableness of the price.
( B ) Cost data to the extent necessary for the contracting officer to determine a fair and reasonable price.
( 3 ) Obtain the type and quantity of data necessary to establish a fair and reasonable price, but not more data than is necessary. Requesting unnecessary data can lead to increased proposal preparation costs, generally extend acquisition lead time, and consume additional contractor and Government resources. Use techniques such as, but not limited to, price analysis, cost analysis, and/or cost realism analysis to establish a fair and reasonable price. If a fair and reasonable price cannot be established by the contracting officer from the analyses of the data obtained or submitted to date, the contracting officer shall require the submission of additional data sufficient for the contracting officer to support the determination of the fair and reasonable price.
( b ) Price each contract separately and independently and not— ( 1 ) Use proposed price reductions under other contracts as an evaluation factor; or
( 2 ) Consider losses or profits realized or anticipated under other contracts.
( c ) Not include in a contract price any amount for a specified contingency to the extent that the contract provides for a price adjustment based upon the occurrence of that contingency.
[62 FR 51230, Sept. 30, 1997, as amended at 66 FR 2129, Jan. 10, 2001; 75 FR 53142, Aug. 30, 2010; 77 FR 204, Jan. 3, 2012]
#### 1552.216-71 Date of incurrence of cost.

At prescribed in 1516.307, insert the following contract clause in cost-reimbursement contracts when an anticipatory cost letter has been issued on the project. The beginning dates and the not-to-exceed amount to be inserted in the clause should be those in the anticipatory cost letter.

# Date of Incurrence of Cost (APR 1984)

The Contractor is entitled to reimbursement for allowable, allocable costs incurred during the period of __________________ to the award date of this contract in an amount not to exceed

$

All terms and conditions of this contract are in effect from

(End of clause)
| **A r c h i v e d    I n f o r m a t i o n** |
|-------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                        | ****

Letter                  from                Norma V. Cant?,*Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights*

**Richard                  W. Riley**                Secretary                 U.S. Department of Education

**Norma                  V. Cant?**                Assistant Secretary                Office for Civil Rights                U.S. Department of Education

 December                  2000

 Permission                  to reprint this publication is not necessary. However, if the                  resource guide is reprinted, please cite it as the source and                  retain the credits to the original authors or originators of any                  of the documents contained in the Appendices. For questions about                  reprinting material in the Appendices, contact the author or originator                  of the document. The full text of the resource guide is available                  at the U.S. Department of Education?s Office for Civil Rights?                  (OCR?s) web page, www.ed.gov/offices/OCR. Individuals with disabilities                  may obtain this document in an alternate format (such as Braille,                  large print, audiotape, or computer diskette) on request. For                  more information, please contact OCR by telephone at 800-421-3481                  or by e-mail at OCR@ed.gov. Individuals                  who use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) may call                  OCR?s TDD number at 877-521-2172.

 This                  resource guide has been developed by OCR in an effort to assemble                  the best information regarding test measurement standards, legal                  principles, and resources to help educators and policy-makers                  ensure that uses of tests as a part of decision-making that has                  high-stakes consequences for students are educationally sound                  and legally appropriate. The resource guide is intended to reflect                  existing test measurement and legal principles. The resource guide                  is not intended to and does not add to, or subtract from, any                  otherwise applicable federal requirements. This publication supersedes                  any earlier drafts, notes, or other preparatory versions of this                  document. 

**Table                  of Contents/Index***                Download                  Document*

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSINTRODUCTION:  An                  Overview of the Resource GuideCHAPTER 1:   Test Measurement                  PrinciplesCHAPTER 2:   Legal                  PrinciplesAPPENDIX A:  Glossary of                  Legal TermsAPPENDIX B:  Glossary of                  Test Measurement TermsAPPENDIX C:  Accommodations                  Used by States TableAPPENDIX D:  Legal CompendiumAPPENDIX E:  Resources                  and References |
#### 1819.7203 Mentor-protégé advanced payments.

If advance payments are contemplated, the mentor must first have the advance payments approved by the contracting officer in accordance with FAR subpart 32.4.

[88 FR 69885, Oct. 10, 2023]
#### 1809.507 Solicitation provisions and contract clause.