T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i at e f orpubl i c at i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3. NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T AL AN NE S S ; AL MA T OWNS E ND ; MAUR I C E B AS HE E R ; B OB T I DD ; BR I AN SE XSON ; BRUCE M ACBR I DE; CA M I E M U RA D ; CH ERY L BA I LA R; D EBRA REIN ; D ERRI CK SA N D ERS; DI AN E GRUB I C ; DO NA L D P E DE N; DO UG LAS P OW ER S; EDI TH R E S T A U R O ; E R IC C U T L E R ; G L O R IA M EL O; GREG TOW NSEND; HA ER LY HU NTER ; J EAN H UN TE R; J AM ES AL AU R I A; J AME S P E T E R S ON ; J OH N BO O TH ; J O H N CH A RLSO N ; J O SEPH CHAV OEN; KA RE N N I ER HA KE; K EN N ETH SI M O N SEN ; LA U RA WAL DH E I M; L YN N K I MB E R L Y; M A LCO LM TU RN ER; M A RK CH A STEEN ; M A RK LI LLY ; M ELI SSA WI D L U N D ; MI C H A E L WA L D H E I M; M I CH A EL W I ED ERRH O LD ; PA TRI CK M ARTINEZ; HEATHER M ARTINEZ; R A U L P E RN E T T ; R O B E R T G R A H A M; S C OT T J . AR MS T R ON G; S ON I KA T IN K E R ; S T E P H A N IE L A N D E N ; T IM W I LD LU N D ; TO M BEIN A R; TRA CI GEHM ; TR AV I S L EAGE; W ALTE R G RU BI C; W I LLI A M BA RBER, P l ai n t i ffs - A p p el l an t s, N o. 12- 16635 D . C. N o . 3 : 1 2 - c v - 0 0 9 8 7 - CRB

ME MOR AN DU M * 

# FI LED JU N 13 2013 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALST he pane lunani m ous l yc onc l ude s the s e c a s e s ar e s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). 2 v. K A M A L A D . H A R R I S , A tto rn e yG e n e r a l; B E NJAMIN G . DI E HL ; J AME S T OMA; B L I T HE L E E C E , T HO MAS L AY T ON , D efen d an t s - A p p el l ees. M IT C H E L L J. S T E IN ; M IT C H E L L J. STEIN & A SSO CI A TES, LLP, P l ai n t i ffs - A p p el l an t s, v. K A M A L A D . H A R R I S , A tto rn e yG e n e r a l; B E NJAMIN G . DI E HL ; J AME S T OMA; B L I T HE L E E C E ; T HO MAS L AY T ON , D efen d an t s - A p p el l ees. N o. 12- 16950 D . C. N o . 3 : 1 2 - c v - 0 0 9 8 5 - CRB

A pp ea lfr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e N o rth e rn D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia C har l e s R . B r e y e r , D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d June 11, 2013 ** S an F r an c is c o , C a lif

o rn iaT he H on orabl e L aw re nce L . P i er sol , U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctJudg e f or ** * f orthe D i s tr i c tof

S outh D akot a , s i tt i ng byde s i gna t i on. 3 B e f or e : O ’ S C A N N L A IN and H U R W I T Z , C i r c ui tJudge s , and P I E R S O L , S e ni or D i stri ctJudg e. *** I I n N o. 12- 16950, M i t c he l lJ . S t e i n appe a l s f r om an or de rdi s m i s s i ng hi s 42 U . S . C . § 1 98 3 act i on on the basi s of Y o u n g e rv . H

a rr is , 4 0 1 U .S . 3 7 ( 1 9 7 1 ) . D i stri ctcourt s are re qu i re d t o abst ai n from j uri sdi ct i on and d i sm i ss the sui tun der

“ Y ou ng erw h e r e : ( 1 ) s tate p r o c e e d in g s ar e o n g o in g [ at th e tim e th e f e d e r a l s u it is fi l ed] ; (2) i m po rt antst at e i nt er es t s are i nv ol ved; and (3) the pl ai nt i ff has an adequat e opp ortun i ty t o l i t i gat e f eder alcl ai m s i n the st at e procee di ng s. ” Ca n a te lla v . Ca lifo rn ia , 30 4 F . 3d84 3, 85 0 (9th C i r. 20 02 ). T he un derl yi ng A tt orney G e ne r a l ’ s c i vi le nf

or c e m e nta c t i on a ga i ns tS t e i n and the S t at e B ar ’ s a s s um pt i on p r o c e e d in g s s atis f

yth e s e c r ite r ia . See Mi ddles exCnt y. E thi cs Com m . v. G arden State B ar A ss ’n , 4 5 7 U .S . 4 2 3 , 4 3 1

– 3 5 ( 1 9 8 2 ) . S te in h a s n o t s h o w n th at th e s tate a c t i ons ar e i na de quat e f orhi m t o r a i s e anyc ons t i tut i ona lorothe rf e de r a lc l a i m s he m ayh av e . See i d. at 4 3 5

– 3 6 .A l lo u t st an d i n g m o t i o n s fo r j u d i ci aln o t i ce are d en i edas u n n ecessary. 1 4 II In N o . 1 2 -1 6 6 3 5 , S teinan dso m e o f h is fo rm erclien ts ap p ea l th e d en ial o f “a t em po raryre stra i ni ng order andorder t o sho w cause r egar di ng prel i m i nary in ju n c tio n .” O u rd is p o s itio n o f th e ap p e a l f

r o m th e f in a l ju d g m e n t o f

d is m is s a l in N o . 1 2 - 1 6 9 5 0 r e n d e r s th e p r o p r ie tyo f p r e lim in aryr e lie f

m o o t. See T

aylor v. U n ite d Sta tes , 1 8 1 F .3 d1 0 1 7 , 1 0 2 2 n .9 ( 9 th C ir . 1 9 9 9 ) ( e n b an c ) ; Mt. G raha m R ed Squi rr e l v . M adi gan , 95 4 F . 2d14 41 , 14 50 (9th C i r. 19 92 ). No . 1 2 - 1 6 9 5 0 AF F I RME D; No . 1 2 - 1 6 6 3 5 DI S MI S S E D. 1