alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM (A) THE
     12-31-97  FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS  CONTAINED  IN FORM 10-KSB FOR DECEMBER 31,
     1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH (B) FORM 10-KSB.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>      0000318245                           
<NAME>     ASSOCIATED MEDIAL DEVICES, INC.                   
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          4248
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       44094
<OTHER-SE>                                     (48342)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   0
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1416
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1416)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1416)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1416)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        


</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 5.0.3

Eastern Division

Luis Guilin

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:11−cv−07763

Honorable James B. Zagel

Walgreen Co.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Thursday, June 14, 2012:

 MINUTE entry before Honorable James B. Zagel:Motion hearing held on

6/14/2012 regarding Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim [36] Set deadlines as

to Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim [36]. Response due by 7/16/2012. Reply

due by 8/6/2012. Status hearing (8−15−2012) is reset for 9/12/2012 at 10:00 AM.Mailed

notice(drw, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:11-cv-07763 Document #: 40 Filed: 06/14/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:229
#### CHEMICAL NAT. BANK OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. KELLOGG, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

November 20, 1903.)

Action by the Chemical National Bank of New York against Amy H. Kellogg.

P. A. Hargous, for appellant. W. D. Tyndall, for respondent

No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs.
### §112. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act Mar. 4, 1915, ch. 147, §1, 38 Stat. 1151; 1940 Reorg. Plan No. V, eff. June 14, 1940, 5 F.R. 2423, 54 Stat. 1238, which related to employment of officers and clerks enforcing alien contract labor laws, was transferred to section 342i of former Title 5, Executive Departments and Government Officers and Employees, and subsequently eliminated from the Code on enactment of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees, by Pub. L. 89–554, Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 378. See section 1103 of this title.
_______________________________________ __ 

### Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



## November 25, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice



## 137310 Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r Marilyn Kell y Maura D. Corriga n 

## PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman,
J ustices



## v SC: 137310 COA: 285933 Genesee CC: 07-020850-FC DARTON CLIFFORD REESE, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 25, 2008 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

s1117 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 25, 2008

Clerk
#### Sheila Ramsey, an Infant, by Mary Ramsey, Her Mother and Natural Guardian, et al., Respondents, v Jewish Hospital and Medical Center of Brooklyn, Appellant.

— In a medical malpractice action, defendant appeals (by permission) from an order of the Appellate Term of the Supreme Court for the Second and Eleventh Judicial Districts, dated July 6, 1978, which affirmed a judgment of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County, entered November 10, 1977, which is in favor of the infant plaintiff in the principal amount of $75,000. Order of the Appellate Term and judgment of the Civil Court reversed, on the law, and new trial granted only with respect to the damages sustained by the infant plaintiff, with costs to abide the event, unless within 30 days after entry of the order to be made hereon, plaintiffs shall serve and file in the office of the clerk of the trial court a written stipulation consenting to reduce the verdict in favor of the *681infant plaintiff to $25,000, and the entry of an amended order and an amended judgment accordingly, in which event the order and the judgment, as so reduced and amended, are affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The testimony of plaintiffs’ expert with respect to limitation of the infant plaintiff’s grasping and lifting power was imprecise and speculative. Furthermore, it conflicted with the records of a nonparty hospital in which the examining doctors found that the infant plaintiff had regained 100% function and movement in her arm within six months of the fracture. This court has previously found that an expert opinion proffered by the plaintiffs’ medical expert in this case lacked probative weight (see *Putnam v Stout,*46 AD2d 812, affd 38 NY2d 607). The only credible evidence with respect to damages in this case related to minor cosmetic damages suffered by the infant plaintiff, which were conceded by the defendant’s expert. Accordingly, the judgment was excessive to the extent indicated herein. Titone, J. P., Suozzi, Gulotta and Martuscello, JJ., concur.
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas December 13, 2021 No. 04-21-00265-CV IN THE INTEREST OF B.M.S. AND J.R.S., CHILDREN From the 454th Judicial District Court, Medina County, Texas

Trial Court No. 18-11-25367-CV Honorable Vivian Torres, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R The pro se appellant’s motion for access to the appellate record is GRANTED. The Clerk of this court is instructed to promptly send appellant a copy of the clerk’s record and reporter’s record in this appeal for use in preparing an appellant’s brief. Appellant’s pro se motion for an extension of time to file the appellant’s brief is also GRANTED. The pro se appellant’s brief is due to be filed in this court no later than twenty (20) days from the date of this order.

_________________________________ Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 13th day of December, 2021.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Petra E. Cordero, Respondent. Martin P. Catherwood, as Industrial Commissioner, Appellant.

Motion to withdraw and discontinue appeal granted, without costs.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS AND STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS ON PAGES 3-5 OF THE COMPANY'S
DECEMBER 31, 1997 FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          16,146
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   54,277
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (828)
<INVENTORY>                                     18,055
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                95,675
<PP&E>                                         417,147
<DEPRECIATION>                                  98,657
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 453,204
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          108,510
<BONDS>                                        260,068
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              717
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      22,230
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   453,204
<SALES>                                        171,366
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               172,469
<CGS>                                          128,662
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  167,450
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,335
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (8,316)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (3,145)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,203)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,203)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (7.83)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (7.83)
        

</TABLE>
### §8315. Regulations and orders

The Secretary may promulgate such regulations, and issue such orders, as the Secretary determines necessary to carry out this chapter.

(Pub. L. 107–171, title X, §10416, May 13, 2002, 116 Stat. 507.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this subtitle", meaning subtitle E (§§10401–10418) of title X of Pub. L. 107–171, May 13, 2002, 116 Stat. 494, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of subtitle E to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 8301 of this title and Tables.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of functions of the Secretary of Agriculture relating to agricultural import and entry inspection activities under this chapter to the Secretary of Homeland Security, and for treatment of related references, see sections 231, 551(d), 552(d), and 557 of Title 6, Domestic Security, and the Department of Homeland Security Reorganization Plan of November 25, 2002, as modified, set out as a note under section 542 of Title 6.
#### Philip Amigone, Respondent, v. Rose C. Girard, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. (Appeal from judgment of Erie Special Term striking out defendant’s answer, denying plaintiff’s prayer for damages and directing defendant to specifically perform a contract to sell.) Present — Bastow, J. P., Goldman, Halpern, MeClusky and Henry, JJ.
#### 1451.102 Authorization to use Government supply sources.

If the CO decides to authorize a contractor to use Government supply sources under the conditions prescribed in FAR 51.102, a written request for a FEDSTRIP activity address code (*See* FPMR 101-26.203) shall be made through the acquisition office FEDSTRIP point of contact.
1805.303 Announcement of contract awards. ( a )
( i ) In lieu of the threshold cited in FAR 5.303(a), a NASA Headquarters public announcement is required for award of contract actions that have a total anticipated value, including unexercised options, of $5 million or greater.
[80 FR 36720, June 26, 2015]
#### State of Connecticut *v.*Salvatore Panella

*Ernest J. Diette, Jr.,*assistant state’s attorney, for the appellee (state).

*W. Paul Flynn,*for the appellant (defendant).

Argued December 3

decided December 3, 1974

It appearing that the state has failed to defend with proper diligence against the defendant’s appeal, it is, under Practice Book § 696, ordered by the Supreme Court, suo motu, that, unless the state files its brief on or before February 3, 1975, the judgment of the Superior Court in New Haven County finding the defendant guilty as charged is set aside and the case is remanded thereto with direction to render judgment that the defendant is not guilty and to order that he be discharged.
TRAVIS STEEBY,

Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF 

CORRECTIONS,

Appellee.

___________________________/

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D15-4160

Opinion filed December 21, 2016.

An appeal from an order of the Leon County Circuit Court.

Angela Dempsey, Judge.

Travis Steeby, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Erik Kverne, Assistant Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

OSTERHAUS, BILBREY, and WINOKUR, JJ., CONCUR.
Exhibit 32.2

BRIGGS & STRATTON CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

Form
10-Q for Quarterly Period Ended December 27, 2009

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Briggs & Stratton
Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 27, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James E. Brenn, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ James E. Brenn     
|James E. Brenn         
|Chief Financial Officer
|February 3, 2010       

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
# May 2023 FOIA Log
EXHIBIT 31.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     I, Michael Schumacher, certify that:

     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Federal Mortgage
Corporation of Puerto Rico, Inc.

     2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

     4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

          a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

          b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

          c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation
as of the Evaluation Date.

     5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

          a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

          b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
controls; and

     6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or
in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date:  February 17, 2006


 /s/ Michael Schumacher
------------------------------------------------
Michael Schumacher
Treasurer, Secretary and Chief Financial Officer
-82 -80 -78 -76 -74

 36

 38

 40

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

06/01

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 01 Jun 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 39.44 N 77.04 W Meters AGL
C. A. No. 73-278.

#### State *v.*John Euart.

*Richard J. Israel,*Attorney General, *Donald P. Ryan,*Asst. Attorney General, *R. Raymond Greco,*Special Asst. Attorney General, for plaintiff. *Andrew A. Bucci,*for defendant.

Defendant is ordered to appear before the court on Monday, April 7, 1975, at 9:30 a.m. to show cause why the above-entitled matter should not be dismissed for failure to comply with the rules of the Supreme Court.
#### 1552.237-75 Paperwork Reduction Act.

As prescribed in 1537.110, insert this contract clause in any contract requiring the collection of identical information from ten (10) or more public respondents.

# Paperwork Reduction Act (APR 1984)

If it is established at award or subsequently becomes a contractual requirement to collect identical information from ten (10) or more public respondents, the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, 44 U.S.C. 3501 *et seq.* applies. In that event, the Contractor shall not take any action to solicit information from any of the public respondents until notified in writing by the Contracting officer that the required Office of Management and Budget (OMB) final clearance was received.

(End of clause)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 5.0.3

Eastern Division

United State Of America

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:11−cv−05937

Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman

Aimee Krause

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Monday, May 14, 2012:

 MINUTE entry before Honorable Jeffrey T. Gilbert: The parties reported to the

Court's courtroom deputy that they have reached an agreement in principle. Settlement

conference set for 5/15/12 at 1:15 p.m. is stricken. Status hearing set for 6/12/12 at 9:45

a.m. Mailed notice(ep, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:11-cv-05937 Document #: 43 Filed: 05/14/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:232
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                      5
<MULTIPLIER>                   1

<S>                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              APR-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                   OCT-31-1998
<CASH>                         76,111
<SECURITIES>                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                  495,158
<ALLOWANCES>                   78,736
<INVENTORY>                    2,188,698
<CURRENT-ASSETS>               3,306,632
<PP&E>                         2,343,211
<DEPRECIATION>                 1,162,894
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                 10,988,945
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>          1,945,132
<BONDS>                        2,308,058
<COMMON>                       125,557
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>          0
<PREFERRED>                    355,236
<OTHER-SE>                     5,604,962
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>   10,988,945
<SALES>                        4,237,290
<TOTAL-REVENUES>               4,237,290
<CGS>                          3,437,303
<TOTAL-COSTS>                  4,042,815
<OTHER-EXPENSES>               44,915
<LOSS-PROVISION>               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>             88,227
<INCOME-PRETAX>                151,163
<INCOME-TAX>                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>            151,163
<DISCONTINUED>                 (315,328)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                0
<CHANGES>                      0
<NET-INCOME>                   (164,165)
<EPS-BASIC>                  (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                  (.02)


</TABLE>