alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, October 03, 2016.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, October 03, 2016

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A17D0076. PLATINUM STAFFING, INC. v. MARK BUTLER, COMMISSIONER OF 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR et al. .

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of 

this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record 

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

LC NUMBERS:

2016CV273067
### §499s. Depositing appropriations in fund

Any unexpended balances of appropriations for the current fiscal year, and any subsequent appropriations, made to carry out the Acts referred to in section 499c(b) of this title, may be deposited in the Perishable Agricultural Commodities Act fund.

(June 10, 1930, ch. 436, §19, as added June 15, 1950, ch. 254, §4, 64 Stat. 218.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Acts referred to in section 499c(b) of this title, referred to in text, mean the Perishable Agricultural Commodities Act, 1930, which was translated to read "this chapter" and the Act to prevent the destruction or dumping of farm produce, act Mar. 3, 1927, ch. 309, 44 Stat. 1355, which is classified to chapter 20 (§491 et seq.) of this title.
#### 1631.205-71 FEHBP bad debts.

Erroneous benefit payments are not automatically disallowed by FAR 31.205-3.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Robert Johnson and Stamford Webb, Appellants.

Judgments of conviction unanimously affirmed. No opinion. Concur — Rabin, J. P., Valente, McNally, Stevens and Eager, JJ.
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

Below is a listing of new OSEP discretionary funding opportunities in chronological order. Information included is:
                  - ALN
                  - The program's Assistance Listing Number (ALN)
                  - Competition Title
                  - The competition's title
                  - Dates
                  - Competition opening and closing dates
                  - Application
                  - The application package
                  - Abstract
                  - An application abstract, if applicable
                  - Webinar
                  - A Webinar on the application process, if applicable

## Currently Open Grant Competitions

----

 

 Printable view

## How Do I Find...

          - Student loans, forgiveness
          - Higher Education Rulemaking
          - College accreditation
          - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
          - FERPA
          - FAFSA
          - 1098, tax forms

More >

## Information About...

          - Elevating Teaching
          - Early Learning
          - Engage Every Student
          - Unlocking Career Success
          - Cybersecurity

 

----

*Our mission*

Student Loans
Repaying LoansDefaulted LoansLoan ForgivenessLoan Servicers

Grants & Programs
Apply for Pell GrantsGrants ForecastApply for a Grant

Laws & Guidance
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)FERPACivil RightsNew IDEA Website

Data & Research
Education StatisticsPostsecondary Education DataED Data ExpressNation's Report CardWhat Works ClearinghouseOpen Data PlatformCOVID Relief Data

About Us
Contact UsED OfficesJobsPress ReleasesFAQsRecursos en españolBudget, PerformancePrivacy Program

----

          - Notices
          - FOIA
          - Privacy Policy
          - Accessibility
          - Security
          - Information quality
          - Inspector General
          - Whitehouse.gov
          - USA.gov
          - Benefits.gov
          - Regulations.gov
          - vote.gov
#### 1352.228-71 Deductibles under required insurance coverage—cost reimbursement.

As prescribed in 48 CFR 1328.310-70(c), insert the following clause:

# Deductibles Under Required Insurance Coverage—Cost Reimbursement (APR 2010)

(a) The contractor is required to present evidence of the amount of any deductibles in its insurance coverage.

(b) For any insurance required pursuant to *1352.228-70, Insurance Coverage,* the contractor's deductible is not allowable as a direct or indirect cost under this contract. The Government is not liable, and cannot be invoiced, for any losses up to the minimum amounts of coverage required in paragraphs (a) through (d) of clause 1352.228-70. If the contractor obtains an insurance policy with deductibles, the contractor, and not the Government, is responsible for any deductible amount up to the minimum amounts of coverage stated.

(c) If the contractor fails to follow all procedures stated in this subsection and in FAR 52.228-7(g), any amounts above the amount of the obtained insurance coverage which are not covered by insurance will not be reimbursable under the contract.

(End of clause)

[75 FR 10570, Mar. 8, 2010; 75 FR 14496, Mar. 26, 2010]
14.205 Presolicitation notices. In lieu of initially forwarding complete bid sets, the contracting officer may send presolicitation notices to concerns. The notice shall— ( a ) Specify the final date for receipt of requests for a complete bid set;
( b ) Briefly describe the requirement and furnish other essential information to enable concerns to determine whether they have an interest in the invitation; and
( c ) Normally not include drawings, plans, and specifications. The return date of the notice must be sufficiently in advance of the mailing date of the invitation for bids to permit an accurate estimate of the number of bid sets required. Bid sets shall be sent to concerns that request them in response to the notice.
[68 FR 43856, July 24, 2003]
# October 2023 FOIA Log
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

 
 

Exhibit 4.10    
    


CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT

PURSUANT TO 3807(E) OF THE DELAWARE STATUTORY TRUST ACT

(12 Del. C. § 3801 et seq.)  


        THIS Certificate of Amendment is being duly executed and filed on behalf of each Delaware statutory trust (collectively, the "Trusts") represented by Chase
Manhattan Bank USA, National Association, the undersigned, as trustee, to amend the respective Certificates of Trust of the Trusts pursuant to §3807(e) of the Delaware Statutory
Trust Act (12 Del. C. § 3801 et seq.) (the "Act"). 



        1.     Amendment of Trust. The Certificate of Trust of each of the Trusts is hereby amended by changing the name of the trustee
of the Trusts in the State of Delaware to Chase Bank USA, National Association. 


        2.     Effective Date. This Certificate of Amendment shall be effective upon filing with the Secretary of State. 


        IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate in accordance with Section 3807(e) of the Act. 



	

 	
 	

CHASE BANK USA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, formerly known as CHASE MANHATTAN BANK USA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, not in its individual capacity but solely as Trustee
	

 	
 	

By:	
 	

/s/  SARIKA M. SHETH      

	 	 	Name:	 	Sarika M. Sheth
	 	 	Title:	 	Trust Officer
	

 	
 	

State of Delaware

Secretary of State

Division of Corporations

Delivered 06:30 PM 03/14/2005

Filed 06:30 PM 03/14/2005

SRV 050212787—2876286 FILE













QuickLinks



Exhibit 4.10
**MEMORANDUM**

DATE: March 12 , 2015 TO: Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR
–2013
-0602 FROM: Terry Johnson , EPA Region 6 SUBJECT: March 12, 2015 Conference Call Regarding Proposed Clean Power Plan for

Existing Power Plants

**SUMMARY** A conference call was held between EPA and the Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality and Public Service Commission on March 12, 2015 to seek clarification regarding some techn ical comments that Arkansas DEQ and PSC submitted in their joint comment letter during the public comment period
. Topics discussed included: The issues identified on the “Generation Concerns” and “CO2 emissions Concerns” sheets of the spreadsheet attached to the comment from Arkansas, which can be categorized into four main issues:

 Nameplate capacity discrepancies (Cecil Lynch, Fourche Creek Wastewater, Paragould Reciprocating, Robert Ritchie, and Two Pine Landfill Gas Recovery facilities).

 NGCC generation calculations and methodology.

 CO2 emissions calculations and methodology.

 Generation and emissions calculation methodologies for the following facilities: the Dell Power Station, Harry L Oswald , Hot Spring Generating Facility, Magnet Cove Gas Combustion Turbine, Pine Bluff Energy Center, Thomas Fitzhugh, and Union Power Partners.**ATTENDEES**

**Arkansas DEQ** Stuart Spencer Legal Policy Advisor Elizabeth Sartain Environmental Program Coordinator, Air Division Tricia Jackson Ecologist, Air Division

**Arkansas PSC** Eddie Moore Policy Advisor

**US EPA** Kathleen Aisling Air Program Branch, R6 Terry Johnson Air Program Branch, R6 Ashley Mohr Air Program Branch, R6 Clovis Steib Air Program Branch, R6 Kristen Bremer OAQPS, RTP Mikail Adamantiades CA MD, HQ Travis Johnson CAMD, HQ Jeremy Mark CAMD, HQ Erika Wilson CAMD, HQ
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

About EDOVERVIEW

*The U.S. Department of Education is the agency of the federal government that establishes policy for, administers, and coordinates most federal assistance to education.*

|  |
|--|

| 1.  | What Is the U.S. Department of Education?                         |
|----------|-------------------------------------------------------------------|
|          |
| 2.  | How Does the Department of Education Serve America’s Students?.   |
|          |
| 3.  | What Is Not Part of the Department of Education’s Role?           |
|          |
| 4.  | How Is the Department of Education Organized?                     |
|          |
| 5.  | Where Is the Department of Education?                             |
|          |
| 6.  | Where Can I Get More Information?                                 |
Docket Np: FAA - 2016 - 3702 Dir ID: 2015 - NM - 103 - AD
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

We hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Form 10-QSB of Reliability Incorporated (the Issuer) for the quarterly period ended
September 30, 2006 (the Periodic Report):



| | 1. | Fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |  |  |                               
|----------------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------------
|/s/ Larry Edwards       |  |  |  | /s/ James M. Harwell          
|Larry Edwards           |  |  |  | James M. Harwell              
|Chief Executive Officer |  |  |  | Acting Chief Financial Officer
|November 14, 2006       |  |  |  | November 14, 2006
### §7956. Planting flexibility

#### (a) Permitted crops

Subject to subsection (b), any commodity or crop may be planted on the base acres for peanuts on a farm.

#### (b) Limitations regarding certain commodities

#### (1) General limitation

The planting of an agricultural commodity specified in paragraph (2) shall be prohibited on base acres for peanuts unless the commodity, if planted, is destroyed before harvest.

#### (2) Treatment of trees and other perennials

The planting of an agricultural commodity specified in paragraph (3) that is produced on a tree or other perennial plant shall be prohibited on base acres for peanuts.

#### (3) Covered agricultural commodities

Paragraphs (1) and (2) apply to the following agricultural commodities:

(A) Fruits.

(B) Vegetables (other than lentils, mung beans, and dry peas).

(C) Wild rice.

#### (c) Exceptions

Paragraphs (1) and (2) of subsection (b) shall not limit the planting of an agricultural commodity specified in paragraph (3) of that subsection—

(1) in any region in which there is a history of double-cropping of peanuts with agricultural commodities specified in subsection (b)(3), as determined by the Secretary, in which case the double-cropping shall be permitted;

(2) on a farm that the Secretary determines has a history of planting agricultural commodities specified in subsection (b)(3) on the base acres for peanuts, except that direct payments and counter-cyclical payments shall be reduced by an acre for each acre planted to such an agricultural commodity; or

(3) by the producers on a farm that the Secretary determines has an established planting history of a specific agricultural commodity specified in subsection (b)(3), except that—

(A) the quantity planted may not exceed the average annual planting history of such agricultural commodity by the producers on the farm in the 1991 through 1995 or 1998 through 2001 crop years (excluding any crop year in which no plantings were made), as determined by the Secretary; and

(B) direct payments and counter-cyclical payments shall be reduced by an acre for each acre planted to such agricultural commodity.

(Pub. L. 107–171, title I, §1306, May 13, 2002, 116 Stat. 174.)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,469,990
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      2,317
<COMMON>                                     6,564,330
<OTHER-SE>                                 (9,036,637)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00


</TABLE>
#### Philip Gersh v. Kaspar & Esh, Inc., et al.

Motion for an extension of time granted, in the absence of opposition, to the extent of extending the defendaruts-appellants’ time -to answer the complaint herein until 10 days after service on the attorneys for defendants-appellants of a copy of the order of this court determining the appeal, with notice of entry thereof. Concur-— Breitel, J. P., Rabin, Valente and Bergan, JJ.
### §392. Repealed. Oct. 31, 1951, ch. 654, §1(11), 65 Stat. 701

Section, act Aug. 10, 1912, ch. 284, 37 Stat. 274, related to sale or exchange of animals not needed.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

RANDALL W. SYLER, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) No. 12 C 1408

)

COUNTY OF WILL, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

MEMORANDUM ORDER

All of the defendants in this 42 U.S.C. §1983 (“Section

1983”) action brought against them by Randall Syler (“Syler”)

have filed their corrected Answer and Affirmative Defenses

(“ADs”) to Syler’s Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”). This

memorandum order is issued sua sponte to deal with two aspects of

that responsive pleading--a minor one that requires an amendment

to the Answer and a major issue posed by defendants’ detailed

first AD that requires a response by Syler.

As for the minor item, Answer ¶10 fails to comply with Fed.

R. Civ. P. 8(b)(1)(B) by failing to respond to the allegations in

SAC ¶10, stating instead that the document referred to there

“speaks for itself.” That is unacceptable--see App’x ¶3 to State

Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Riley, 199 F.R.D. 276, 278 (N.D. Ill.

2001). Accordingly Answer ¶10 must be suitably amended on or

before December 19, 2012.1

 That amendment can take the form of a one-paragraph 1

pleading, rather than dealing with the response more extensively.
As for the major issue, AD 1 sets out a detailed 18-

paragraph contention that Syler has failed to comply with the

mandate of 42 U.S.C. §1997e(a), which establishes a prisoner’s

exhaustion of administrative remedies as a precondition to any

Section 1983 action that relates to prison conditions. According

to the AD, the grievance advanced by Syler at the Will County

Adult Detention Facility did not satisfy that precondition. And

because that poses a threshold issue in this litigation, Syler’s

counsel is ordered to file a response to that AD on or before

December 21, 2012, and this Court will then determine what

further proceedings may be called for in that respect.2

________________________________________

Milton I. Shadur

Senior United States District Judge

Date: December 10, 2012

 AD 2 advances a qualified immunity defense on behalf of 2

three of the individual defendants, but that issue that does not

call for consideration at the outset of the case.

2
### §1422. Eligibility for naturalization

The right of a person to become a naturalized citizen of the United States shall not be denied or abridged because of race or sex or because such person is married.

(June 27, 1952, ch. 477, title III, ch. 2, §311, 66 Stat. 239; Pub. L. 100–525, §9(t), Oct. 24, 1988, 102 Stat. 2621.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1988—Pub. L. 100–525 struck out at end "Notwithstanding section 405(b) of this Act, this section shall apply to any person whose petition for naturalization shall hereafter be filed, or shall have been pending on the effective date of this chapter."
1480.503 Procedures for acquisitions under the Buy Indian Act. ( a ) Commercial items or simplified acquisitions under this section must conform to the competition and price reasonableness documentation requirements of FAR 12.209 for commercial item acquisitions and FAR 13.106 for simplified acquisitions.
( b ) When acquiring construction services, solicit proposals and evaluate potential contractors in accordance with FAR part 36 and DIAR subpart 1436.2.
( c ) When acquiring A&E services, solicit proposals and evaluate potential contractors in accordance with FAR part 36 and DIAR subpart 1436.6.
( d ) This paragraph (d) applies to solicitations that are not restricted to participation of IEEs. ( 1 ) If an interested IEE is identified after a solicitation has been issued, but before the date established for receipt of offers, the contracting office must provide a copy of the solicitation to this enterprise. In this case, the CO: ( i ) Will not give preference under the Buy Indian Act to the IEE; and
( ii ) May extend the date for receipt of offers when practical.
( 2 ) If more than one IEE is identified subsequent to the solicitation, but prior to the date established for receipt of offers, the CO may cancel the solicitation and re-compete it as an IEE set-aside.
( e ) This paragraph (e) lists the clauses and provisions that must be inserted. ( 1 ) Insert the clause at 1452.280-1, Notice of Indian Small Business Economic Enterprise set-aside, in accordance with 1480.401(c).
( 2 ) Insert the clause at 1452.280-2, Notice of Indian Economic Enterprise set-aside, in accordance with 1480.401(d).
( 3 ) Insert the clause at 1452.280-3, Indian Economic Enterprise subcontracting limitations, in accordance with 1480.601(b).
( 4 ) Insert the clause at 1452.280-4, Indian Economic Enterprise representation, in accordance with 1480.801(a).
#### § 37.555 How do I value a recipient's other contributions?

For types of participant contributions other than those addressed in §§ 37.535 through 37.550, the general rule is that you are to value each contribution consistently with the cost principles or standards in § 37.625 and § 37.635 that apply to the participant making the contribution. When valuing services and property donated by parties other than the participants, you may use as guidance the provisions of 32 CFR 34.13(b)(2) through (5).
### SUBCHAPTER IV—LOSS OF NATIONALITY
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION

In re the Complaint of 

FRIENDS OF THE EAST HAMPTON AIRPORT, INC., 

ANALAR CORPORATION, ASSOCIATED AIRCRAFT 

GROUP, INC., HELICOPTER ASSOCIATION 

INTERNATIONAL, INC., HELIFLITE SHARES LLC, 

LIBERTY HELICOPTERS, INC., and SHORELINE 

AVIATION, INC.

Complainants,

-againstEAST HAMPTON AIRPORT, 

a division of the TOWN OF EAST HAMPTON

Respondent.

Pursuant to Part 16 of the Federal Aviation Regulations

Docket No.: 16-15-02

UNOPPOSED MOTION TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO REPLY

1. On May 1, 2015, the Respondent submitted its Answer and Motion to 

Dismiss in Docket No. 16-15-02. Under the Part 16 Procedural Rules, a response to a 

motion and a Reply shall be made within ten days of the date of service.

2. The Complainant hereby requests an extension to the deadline, until and 

including June 8, 2015 to submit its Reply and Opposition to the Motion to Dismiss. The 

Complainant has communicated with the Respondent and the Respondent consents to this 

extension.
2

Dated: May 6, 2015

Jericho, New York

________________________________

Leonard D. Kirsch, Esq.

Shelley A. Ewalt, Esq.

McBreen & Kopko

Attorneys for Complainants

500 North Broadway

Jericho, New York 11753

Tel: (516) 364-1095

Fax: (516) 364-0612
CERTIFICATION

I hereby certify that on May 6, 2015, I served the foregoing Unopposed Motion to 

Extend Deadline to Reply on the following persons electronically:

Elizabeth Vail

Town Attorney

Town of East Hampton

159 Pantigo Road

East Hampton, NY 11937

EVail@EHamptonNY.Gov

W. Eric Pilsk

Catherine van Heuven

Kaplan Kirsch & Rockwell LLP

1001 Connecticut Ave., NW, Suite 800

Washington, DC 20036

epilsk@kaplankirsch.com

cvanheuven@kaplankirsch.com

Telephone: (202) 955-5600

Facsimile: (202) 955-5616

Office of the Chief Counsel

Attn: FAA Part 16 Airport Proceedings Docket, AGC-610

Federal Aviation Administration

800 Independence Avenue, SW

Washington, DC 20591

1 copy via E-mail

9-AWA-AGC-Part-16@faa.gov

____________________________

Shelley A. Ewalt, Esq.

McBreen & Kopko

Attorneys for Complainant

500 North Broadway

Jericho, New York 11753

sewalt@mklawnyc.com

Tel: (516) 364-1095

Fax: (516) 364-0612