5132 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 11 / Tuesday, January 19, 2021 / Notices 

‘‘Comments for the Advisory Committee 

on Data for Evidence Building;’’ and 

indicate which numbered questions 

described in the SUPPLEMENTARY

INFORMATION of this notice your 

comments address. Comments by fax or 

paper delivery will not be accepted. 

Privacy Note: Comments submitted in 

response to this notice may be made 

available to the public through relevant 

websites. Therefore, commenters should 

only include information they wish to 

make publicly available on the internet. 

Do not submit confidential business 

information or otherwise sensitive or 

protected information. 

Please note the confidentiality of 

routine communication and responses 

to this public comment request are 

treated as public comments and may 

therefore be made publicly available, 

notwithstanding the inclusion of the 

routine notice. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Lucas Hitt, Designated Federal Official, 

Advisory Committee on Data for 

Evidence Building, 4600 Silver Hill 

Road, Washington, DC 20233 by email 

Gianna Marrone (gianna.marrone@

bea.gov) or by phone (301) 278–9282. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Request for Comments 

The Advisory Committee will review, 

analyze, and make recommendations on 

how to promote the use of data for 

evidence building. The Advisory 

Committee will evaluate and provide 

recommendations to the Director of the 

Office of Management and Budget on 

how to facilitate data sharing, data 

linkage, and privacy enhancing 

techniques in support of evidence 

building. As part of its evaluation, the 

Advisory Committee may consider best 

practices to improve the safe and 

appropriate access to data. The 

Advisory Committee will consider the 

coordination of data sharing and 

availability of data for evidence building 

across all agencies and levels of 

government. The FRN commentators 

may respond to any question and do not 

need to respond to all questions. 

This request for comments offers 

researchers, evaluators, contractors, 

government entities, and other 

interested parties the opportunity to 

inform the Committee’s work. This is a 

general solicitation of comments from 

the public. The Advisory Committee 

will consider all feedback and 

recommendations on core topics and 

central issues such as: 

• Capacity needs for secure data access 

and record linkage. 

• Areas for research and development 

on state-of-the-art data access and 

data protection methods. 

• How to protect privacy when using 

personally identifiable information or 

confidential business information in 

support of evidence building. 

• How to promote transparency and 

facilitate public engagement with the 

evidence building process. 

• Agency needs for data management 

and data stewardship services. 

• How to best facilitate the needs of 

researchers, evaluators, and other 

evidence builders through a national 

data service or similar approach. 

Please clearly indicate which 

question(s) you address in your 

response and any evidence to support 

assertions, where practicable. 

Round 1 

Central Questions— 

1. What are the main challenges faced 

by national, state/provincial, or local 

governments that are trying to build a 

basis for evidence-based policy? Briefly 

describe the bottlenecks and pain-points 

they face in the evidence-based 

decision-making process. 

2. What are examples of high-impact 

data uses for evidence-based policy 

making that successfully effected 

change, reduced costs, or improved the 

welfare of citizens? 

3. Which frameworks, policies, 

practices, or methods show promise in 

overcoming challenges experienced by 

governments in their evidence building? 

4. The Commission on EvidenceBased Policymaking (See: www.cep.gov) 

recommended the creation of a National 

Secure Data Service (See Commission 

Report at www.cep.gov). Do you agree 

with this recommendation, and if so, 

what should be the essential features of 

a National Secure Data Service? 

5. How can federal agencies protect 

individual and organizational privacy 

when using data for evidence building? 

Recommend specific actions the Office 

of Management and Budget and/or other 

federal agencies can take when using 

data for evidence building, as well as 

suggested changes to federal laws, 

policies, and procedures. 

Secure Data Access— 

6. If created, how should a data 

service be structured to best facilitate (1) 

research and development of secure 

data access and confidentiality 

technologies and methods, (2) and 

agency adoption of those technologies 

and techniques? 

7. Government agencies have argued 

that secure data access has value 

because it (1) improves service delivery, 

(2) improves efficiency (lowers costs), 

(3) produces metrics for performance 

measurement, and (4) produces new 

learnings/insights from the data. Which 

of these propositions do you agree holds 

value and why? Do you have examples 

that demonstrate these benefits? Do you 

have other examples of the value of 

secure data access? 

Data Services to Federal, State, Local 

Agencies and the Public— 

8. What are the most pressing data 

needs of state and local decision makers 

and how would making data accessible 

from federal agencies help meet those 

needs? To share data, what guarantees 

do data owners (or data controllers) 

need regarding privacy, data 

stewardship, and retention? 

9. What are the key problems and use 

cases where collaborative work between 

federal, state, and local authorities’ data 

analysis can inform decisions? What are 

key decision support tools? How would 

greater communication about data and 

tools benefit expanded evidence 

building? 

Infrastructure for Meeting Public and 

Evidence Building Needs— 

10. What basic public data services 

are essential for a data service to address 

existing capacity gaps and needs? What 

infrastructure or incentives can the 

federal government create that locals 

and states cannot? 

Dated: December 9, 2020. 

Gianna Marrone, 

Assistant Designated Federal Official, 

Advisory Committee on Data for Evidence 

Building. 

[FR Doc. 2021–01092 Filed 1–15–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–MN–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–533–843] 

Certain Lined Paper Products From 

India: Preliminary Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review and Preliminary Determination 

of No Shipments; 2018–2019 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) is conducting an 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on certain lined 

paper products from India, covering the 

period of review (POR), September 1, 

2018 through August 31, 2019. We 

preliminarily find that Navneet 

Education Ltd. (Navneet) and Super 

Impex did not make sales of subject 

merchandise at less than normal value 

during the POR. We invite interested 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 11 / Tuesday, January 19, 2021 / Notices 5133 

1See Notice of Amended Final Determination of 

Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Certain Lined Paper 

Products from the People’s Republic of China; 

Notice of Antidumping Duty Orders: Certain Lined 

Paper Products from India, Indonesia and the 

People’s Republic of China; and Notice of 

Countervailing Duty Orders: Certain Lined Paper 

Products from India and Indonesia, 71 FR 56949 

(September 28, 2006) (Order). 

2 Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing 

Duty Administrative Reviews, 84 FR 61011 

(November 12, 2019) (Initiation Notice). 

3See Memorandum, ‘‘Tolling of Deadlines for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Reviews in Response to Operational 

Adjustments Due to COVID–19,’’ dated April 24, 

2020. 

4See Memorandum, ‘‘Certain Lined Paper 

Products from India: Extension of Time Limit for 

Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2018–2019,’’ dated June 11, 

2020. 

5See Memorandum, ‘‘Tolling of Deadlines for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Reviews,’’ dated July 21, 2020. 

6 Initiation Notice, 84 FR at 61012–61013. 

7See Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for 

the Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review: Certain Lined Paper 

Products from India; 2018–2019,’’ dated 

concurrently and hereby adopted by this notice 

(Preliminary Decision Memorandum). 

8See Lodha’s Letter, ‘‘Response to Quantity & 

Value Questionnaire,’’ dated November 19, 2019; 

see also Marisa’s Letter, ‘‘Certain Lined Paper 

Products from India: Marisa International (‘Marisa’) 

No export or sales of subject merchandise,’’ dated 

November 26, 2019. 

9See Memorandum, ‘‘No Shipment Inquiry,’’ 

dated December 10, 2019. 

10See Memorandum, ‘‘Request for Entry 

Summary,’’ dated January 27, 2020 at Attachment. 

11Commerce determined not to rescind a review 

with respect to exporters that demonstrate that they 

had no knowledge of sales through resellers to the 

United States because we find it appropriate to 

instruct CBP to liquidate such entries at the allothers rate applicable to the proceeding. Further, 

Commerce explained that it is more consistent with 

the Automatic Assessment Clarification not to 

rescind a review in part under these circumstances 

but rather to complete the review and issue 

appropriate instructions to CBP based on the final 

results of the review. See, e.g., Certain Frozen 

Warmwater Shrimp from Thailand; Preliminary 

Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review, Partial Rescission of Review, Preliminary 

Determination of No Shipments; 2012–2013, 79 FR 

15951, 15952 (March 24, 2014), unchanged in 

Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from Thailand: 

Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review, Final Determination of No Shipments, and 

Partial Rescission of Review; 2012–2013, 79 FR 

51306, 51307 (August 28, 2014) at 6–7 (citing 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: 

Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 

(May 6, 2003) (Automatic Assessment 

Clarification)). 

parties to comment on these preliminary 

results. 

DATES: Applicable January 19, 2021. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Samuel Brummitt, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–7851. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On September 28, 2006, Commerce 

published the Order in the Federal 

Register.1 On November 12, 2019, 

pursuant to section 751(a)(1) of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), 

Commerce initiated an administrative 

review of the Order.2

On April 24, 2020, Commerce tolled 

all deadlines in administrative reviews 

by 50 days.3 On June 11, 2020, we 

extended the deadline for the 

preliminary results to November 18, 

2020.4 On July 21, 2020, Commerce 

tolled all deadlines in administrative 

reviews by an additional 60 days.5 The 

deadline for the preliminary results of 

this review is now January 19, 2021. 

Commerce initiated this 

administrative review covering the 

following 13 companies: Cellpage 

Ventures Private Limited (Cellpage); 

Goldenpalm Manufacturers PVT 

Limited (Goldenpalm); Kokuyo Riddhi 

Paper Products Pvt. Ltd. (Kokuyo); 

Lodha Offset Limited (Lodha); Lotus 

Global Private Limited (Lotus Global); 

Magic International Pvt. Ltd. (Magic); 

Marisa International (Marisa); Navneet; 

Pioneer Stationery Pvt. Ltd. (Pioneer); 

PP Bafna Ventures Private Limited (PP 

Bafna); SAB International (SAB); SGM 

Paper Products (SGM); and Super 

Impex.6 This review covers two 

mandatory respondents, Navneet and 

Super Impex. The other 11 companies 

were not selected for individual 

examination and remain subject to this 

administrative review. 

Scope of the Order 

The merchandise covered by the 

Order is certain lined paper products. 

The merchandise subject to this order is 

currently classified under the following 

Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the 

United States (HTSUS) subheadings: 

4811.90.9035, 4811.90.9080, 

4820.30.0040, 4810.22.5044, 

4811.90.9050, 4811.90.9090, 

4820.10.2010, 4820.10.2020, 

4820.10.2030, 4820.10.2040, 

4820.10.2050, 4820.10.2060, and 

4820.10.4000. Although the HTSUS 

numbers are provided for convenience 

and customs purposes, the written 

product description remains dispositive. 

A full description of the scope of the 

Order is contained in the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum.7

Preliminary Determination of No 

Shipments 

On November 19 and November 26, 

2019, Lodha and Marisa, respectively, 

submitted responses to Commerce’s 

quantity and value questionnaire which 

indicated that the companies had no 

exports or sales of subject merchandise 

into the United States during the POR.8

To confirm Lodha and Marisa’s noshipment claims, on December 6, 2019, 

Commerce issued a no-shipment inquiry 

to U.S. Customs and Border Protection 

(CBP) concerning the two companies.9

CBP reported that it had no information 

to contradict Marisa’s no shipments 

claim during the POR, but it found 

certain inconsistencies with respect to 

Lodha’s no shipment claim.10

Given that Marisa reported that it 

made no shipments of subject 

merchandise to the United States during 

the POR, and there is no information 

calling Marisa’s claim into question, we 

preliminarily determine that Marisa did 

not have any reviewable transactions 

during the POR. Consistent with 

Commerce’s practice, we will not 

rescind the review with respect to 

Marisa but, rather, will complete the 

review and issue instructions to CBP 

based on the final results.11 Concerning 

Lodha, for these preliminary results, we 

have included it among the firms 

subject to the rate for non-selected 

respondents. 

Methodology 

Commerce is conducting this review 

in accordance with section 751(a)(2) of 

the Act. Export price is calculated in 

accordance with section 772 of the Act. 

Normal value is calculated in 

accordance with section 773 of the Act. 

For a full description of the 

methodology underlying our 

preliminary results, see the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum. The 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a 

public document and is on file 

electronically via Enforcement and 

Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 

ACCESS is available to registered users 

at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a 

complete version of the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum can be accessed 

directly at http://enforcement.trade.gov/ 

frn/. The signed Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum and the electronic 

version of the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum are identical in content. 

A list of the topics discussed in the 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum is 

attached as an Appendix to this notice. 

Rate for Non-Selected Respondents 

The statute and Commerce’s 

regulations do not address the 

establishment of a rate to be applied to 

companies not selected for individual 

examination when Commerce limits its 

examination in an administrative review 

pursuant to section 777A(c)(2) of the 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
5134 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 11 / Tuesday, January 19, 2021 / Notices 

12See section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act. 13See Albemarle Corp. v. United States, 821 F.3d 

1345 (Fed. Cir. 2016). 

14 In these preliminary results, Commerce applied 

the assessment rate calculation method adopted in 

Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the 

Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and 

Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping 

Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101 

(February 14, 2012) (Final Modification for 

Reviews). 

15 Id., 77 FR at 8102. 

16See Order, 71 FR at 56952. 

17See Automatic Assessment Clarification. 

18See 19 CFR 351.224(b). 

19See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii). 

20See 19 CFR 351.309(d)(1); see also Temporary 

Rule Modifying AD/CVD Service Requirements Due 

to COVID–19; Extension of Effective Period, 85 FR 

41363 (July 10, 2020) (Temporary Rule). 

21See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2) and 19 CFR 

351.303 (for general filing requirements). 

Act. Generally, Commerce looks to 

section 735(c)(5) of the Act, which 

provides instructions for calculating the 

all-others rate in a market economy 

investigation, for guidance when 

calculating the rate for companies 

which were not selected for individual 

examination in an administrative 

review. Under section 735(c)(5)(A) of 

the Act, the all-others rate is normally 

‘‘an amount equal to the weightedaverage of the estimated weightedaverage dumping margins established 

for exporters and producers 

individually investigated, excluding any 

zero or de minimis margins, and any 

margins determined entirely.’’ 

In this review, we have preliminarily 

calculated weighted-average dumping 

margins for Navneet and Super Impex 

that are zero. For the companies that 

were not selected for individual review, 

we preliminarily assigned a rate based 

on the rates for the respondents that 

were selected for individual review, 

excluding rates that are zero, de 

minimis, or based entirely on facts 

available.12 In accordance with the U.S. 

Court of Appeals for the Federal 

Circuit’s decision in Albemarle Corp. v. 

United States, we are applying to the ten 

companies that had reviewable 

transactions during the POR the zero 

percent rates calculated for Navneet and 

Super Impex.13 These are the only rates 

determined in this review for individual 

respondents and, thus, should be 

applied to the ten firms not selected for 

individual review under section 

735(c)(5)(B) of the Act. 

Preliminary Results of the Review 

As a result of this review, we 

preliminarily find that the following 

weighted-average dumping margins 

existed for the period September 1, 2018 

through August 31, 2019. 

Producer/Exporter 

WeightedAverage 

Dumping 

Margin 

(percent) 

Cellpage Ventures Private Limited .......................................... 0.00 

Goldenpalm Manufacturers PVT 

Limited ..................................... 0.00 

Kokuyo Riddhi Paper Products 

Pvt. Ltd. ................................... 0.00 

Lodha Offset Limited .................. 0.00 

Lotus Global Private Limited ...... 0.00 

Magic International Pvt. Ltd. ....... 0.00 

Navneet Education Ltd. .............. 0.00 

PP Bafna Ventures Private Limited .......................................... 0.00 

Pioneer Stationery Pvt. Ltd. ....... 0.00 

SAB International ........................ 0.00 

Producer/Exporter 

WeightedAverage 

Dumping 

Margin 

(percent) 

SGM Paper Products ................. 0.00 

Super Impex ............................... 0.00 

Assessment Rates 

Upon issuance of the final results, 

Commerce shall determine, and CBP 

shall assess, antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries covered by this 

review. If the weighted-average 

dumping margin for Navneet or Super 

Impex is not zero or de minimis (i.e., 

less than 0.5 percent), we will calculate 

importer-specific ad valorem 

antidumping duty assessment rates 

based on the ratio of the total amount of 

dumping calculated for each importer’s 

examined sales to the total entered 

value of those same sales in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).14 If the 

weighted-average dumping margin for 

the respondents listed above is zero or 

de minimis in the final results, or an 

importer-specific assessment rate is zero 

or de minimis in the final results, we 

will instruct CBP not to assess 

antidumping duties on any of their 

entries in accordance with the Final 

Modification for Reviews.15

In accordance with Commerce’s 

assessment practice, for entries of 

subject merchandise during the POR 

produced by Navneet or Super Impex 

for which it did not know that its 

merchandise was destined for the 

United States, we will instruct CBP to 

liquidate unreviewed entries at the allothers rate of 3.91 percent, as 

established in the less-than-fair-value 

investigation, if there is no rate for the 

intermediate company(ies) involved in 

the transaction.16 For a full discussion 

of this practice, see Assessment Policy 

Notice.17

We intend to issue liquidation 

instructions to CBP 15 days after 

publication of the final results of this 

review. 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective upon 

publication of the notice of final results 

of administrative review for all 

shipments of subject merchandise 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption on or after the 

publication date of the final results of 

this administrative review, as provided 

by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) 

The cash deposit rate for respondents 

noted above will be the rates established 

in the final results of this administrative 

review; (2) for merchandise exported by 

producers or exporters not covered in 

this administrative review but covered 

in a prior segment of the proceeding, the 

cash deposit rate will continue to be the 

company-specific rate published for the 

most recently completed segment of this 

proceeding; (3) if the exporter is not a 

firm covered in this review, a prior 

review, or the original investigation, but 

the producer is, then the cash deposit 

rate will be the rate established for the 

most recently completed segment of this 

proceeding for the producer of the 

subject merchandise; and (4) the cash 

deposit rate for all other producers or 

exporters will continue to be 3.91 

percent, the all-others rate established 

in the investigation. These cash deposit 

requirements, when imposed, shall 

remain in effect until further notice. 

Disclosure and Public Comment 

We will disclose to parties to the 

proceeding any calculations performed 

in connection with these preliminary 

results of review within five days after 

the date of publication of this notice.18

Interested parties may submit case briefs 

not later than 30 days after the date of 

publication of this notice in the Federal 

Register.19 Rebuttal briefs, limited to 

issues raised in the case briefs, may be 

filed no later than seven days after the 

date for filing case briefs.20 Parties who 

submit case briefs or rebuttal briefs in 

this proceeding are encouraged to 

submit with each argument: (1) A 

statement of the issue; (2) a brief 

summary of the argument; and (3) a 

table of authorities.21 All briefs must be 

filed electronically using ACCESS. An 

electronically filed document must be 

received successfully in its entirety by 

the established deadline. 

Interested parties who wish to request 

a hearing, limited to issues raised in the 

case and rebuttal briefs, must submit a 

written request to the Assistant 

Secretary for Enforcement and 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 11 / Tuesday, January 19, 2021 / Notices 5135 

22See 19 CFR 351.310(c). 

1See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, 

Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity 

to Request Administrative Review, 85 FR 47167 

(August 4, 2020). 

2See Regiopytsa’s Letter, ‘‘Light-Walled 

Rectangular Pipe and Tube from Mexico, Request 

for Review,’’ dated August 28, 2020. 

3See Nucor Tubular’s Letter, ‘‘Light-Walled 

Rectangular Pipe and Tube from Mexico: Request 

for Administrative Review,’’ dated August 31, 2020; 

see also Nucor Tubular’s Letter, ‘‘Light-Walled 

Rectangular Pipe and Tube from Mexico: 

Clarification of Request for Administrative 

Review,’’ dated September 23, 2020. Nucor Tubular 

consolidated its request for review of Hylsa S.A. de 

C.V. (Hysla) and Ternium Mexico S.A. de C.V. 

(Ternium), into a request for review of Ternium, the 

successor-in-interest to Hylsa. 

4See Maquilacero’s Letter, ‘‘Light-Walled 

Rectangular Pipe and Tube from Mexico; 

Maquilacero S.A. de C.V.’s Request for 

Administrative Review,’’ dated August 31, 2020. 

5See Perfiles’ Letter, ‘‘Light-Walled Rectangular 

Pipe and Tube from Mexico—Request for 

Administrative Review,’’ dated August 31, 2020. 

6See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 85 FR 

63081 (October 6, 2020) (Initiation Notice). 

7See Nucor Tubular’s Letter, ‘‘Light-Walled 

Rectangular Pipe and Tube from Mexico: Partial 

Withdrawal of Request for Administrative Review,’’ 

dated January 4, 2020. 

8See Initiation Notice. 

Compliance, within 30 days after the 

date of publication of this notice.22

Requests should contain: (1) The party’s 

name, address, and telephone number; 

(2) the number of participants; and (3) 

a list of issues to be discussed. Issues 

raised in the hearing will be limited to 

those raised in the respective case and 

rebuttal briefs. If a request for a hearing 

is made, Commerce intends to hold the 

hearing at a time and date to be 

determined. Parties should confirm by 

telephone the date and time of the 

hearing two days before the scheduled 

date. 

We intend to issue the final results of 

this administrative review, including 

the results of our analysis of the issues 

raised in any written briefs, not later 

than 120 days after the date of 

publication of this notice, pursuant to 

section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice serves as a preliminary 

reminder to importers of their 

responsibility under 19 CFR 

351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 

regarding the reimbursement of 

antidumping duties and/or 

countervailing duties prior to 

liquidation of the relevant entries 

during this review period. Failure to 

comply with this requirement could 

result in the presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping and/or 

countervailing duties occurred and the 

subsequent assessment of doubled 

antidumping duties. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing these 

results in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 

CFR 351.213(h)(1). 

Dated: January 7, 2021. 

Jeffrey I. Kessler, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

Appendix 

List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Preliminary Determination of No 

Shipments 

V. Companies Not Selected for Individual 

Examination 

VI. Discussion of the Methodology 

VII. Currency Conversion 

VIII. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2021–01063 Filed 1–15–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–201–836] 

Light-Walled Rectangular Pipe and 

Tube from Mexico: Partial Rescission 

of Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review: 2019–2020 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) is rescinding the 

administrative review, in part, of the 

antidumping duty order on light-walled 

rectangular pipe and tube (LWRPT) 

from Mexico for the period of review 

August 1, 2019, through July 31, 2020, 

based on timely withdrawals of the 

requests for review. 

DATES: Applicable January 19, 2021. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kyle 

Clahane, AD/CVD Operations, Office III, 

Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–5449. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On August 4, 2020, Commerce 

published a notice of opportunity to 

request an administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on LWRPT 

from Mexico for the period of review 

August 1, 2019, through July 31, 2020.1

On August 28, 2020, Regiomontana de 

Perfiles y Tubos S. de R.L. de C.V. 

(Regiopytsa) filed a timely request for a 

review of itself.2 On August, 31, 2020, 

Nucor Tubular Products Inc. (Nucor 

Tubular), a domestic producer, filed a 

timely request for review with respect to 

19 companies.3 Maquilacero S.A. de 

C.V. (Maquilacero),4 and Perfiles LM, 

S.A. de C.V. (Perfiles),5 timely requested 

reviews of themselves. Based on these 

requests, on October 6, 2020, in 

accordance with section 751(a) of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), 

and 19 CFR 351.221(c)(1)(i), Commerce 

published in the Federal Register a 

notice of initiation of an administrative 

review of the antidumping duty order 

on LWRPT from Mexico covering the 

period August 1, 2019 through July 31, 

2020.6

On January 4, 2021, Nucor Tubular 

withdrew its request for administrative 

review with respect to Aceros Cuatro 

Caminos S.A. de C.V.; Arco Metal S.A. 

de C.V.; Fabricaciones y Servicios de 

Mexico; Galvak, S.A. de C.V.; Grupo 

Estructuras y Perfiles, Industrias 

Monterrey S.A. de C.V.; Internacional de 

Aceros, S.A. de C.V.; PEASA-Productos 

Especializados de Acero; Talleres Acero 

Rey S.A. de C.V.; Tuberias Aspe S.A de 

C.V.; Tuberia Laguna, S.A. de C.V.; and 

Tuberias y Derivados S.A. de C.V.7

Partial Rescission of Review 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), 

Commerce will rescind an 

administrative review, in whole or in 

part, if the party that requested the 

review withdraws its request within 90 

days of the publication date of the 

notice of initiation of the requested 

review. 

Because Nucor Tubular’s request for 

review, for 12 companies, was 

withdrawn within the 90-day deadline, 

and no other interested party requested 

a review of these 12 companies, we are 

rescinding this review with respect to 

these 12 companies. The administrative 

review remains active with respect to 

the seven remaining companies for 

which a review was initiated, i.e., 

Maquilacero S.A. de C.V.; Nacional de 

Acero S.A. de C.V.; Perfiles LM, S.A. de 

C.V.; Productos Laminados de 

Monterrey S.A. de C.V.; Regiomontana 

de Perfiles y Tubos S.A. de C.V.; 

Regiomontana de Perfiles y Tubos S. de 

R.L. de C.V.; and Ternium Mexico S.A. 

de C.V.8

Assessment 

Commerce will instruct U.S. Customs 

and Border Protection (CBP) to assess 

antidumping duties on all appropriate 

entries of LWRPT from Mexico at a rate 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES