alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §1489. Application of treaties; exceptions

Nothing in this subchapter shall be applied in contravention of the provisions of any treaty or convention to which the United States is a party and which has been ratified by the Senate before December 25, 1952: Provided, however, That no woman who was a national of the United States shall be deemed to have lost her nationality solely by reason of her marriage to an alien on or after September 22, 1922, or to an alien racially ineligible to citizenship on or after March 3, 1931, or, in the case of a woman who was a United States citizen at birth, through residence abroad following such marriage, notwithstanding the provisions of any existing treaty or convention.

(June 27, 1952, ch. 477, title III, ch. 3, §357, 66 Stat. 272; Pub. L. 100–525, §9(ii), Oct. 24, 1988, 102 Stat. 2622.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1988—Pub. L. 100–525 substituted "before December 25, 1952" for "upon the effective date of this subchapter".
#### 1315.407-4 Should-cost review.

The should-cost review report shall include all elements listed in FAR 15.407-4(a)(1) and be provided to the contracting officer for use in negotiations.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

 <ARTICLE>      5
 <MULTIPLIER>   1,000
        
 <S>                                   <C>
 <PERIOD-TYPE>                         3-MOS
 <FISCAL-YEAR-END>                     DEC-31-1995
 <PERIOD-END>                          SEP-30-1996
 <CASH>                                734
 <SECURITIES>                          0
 <RECEIVABLES>                         14,601 
 <ALLOWANCES>                          1,322
 <INVENTORY>                           60,131
 <CURRENT-ASSETS>                      90,756
 <PP&E>                                43,713
 <DEPRECIATION>                        16,108
 <TOTAL-ASSETS>                        144,874
 <CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                 72,086
 <BONDS>                               36,595
 <COMMON>                              274
 <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                 0
 <PREFERRED>                           0
 <OTHER-SE>                            26,031
 <TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>          144,874
 <SALES>                               95,972
 <TOTAL-REVENUES>                      92,972
 <CGS>                                 71,122
 <TOTAL-COSTS>                         71,122
 <OTHER-EXPENSES>                      23,769
 <LOSS-PROVISION>                      1,777
 <INTEREST-EXPENSE>                    1,444
 <INCOME-PRETAX>                       1,570
 <INCOME-TAX>                          0
 <INCOME-CONTINUING>                   1,570
 <DISCONTINUED>                        0
 <EXTRAORDINARY>                       0
 <CHANGES>                             0
 <NET-INCOME>                          1,570
 <EPS-PRIMARY>                         0.05
 <EPS-DILUTED>                         0.05
                                       
 
</TABLE>
#### 1332.501-2 Unusual progress payments.

The designee authorized to approve a contractor's request for unusual progress payments is set forth in CAM 1301.70.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CURRENCY>                  US$
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          15,605
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   44,744
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    418,996
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               861,775
<PP&E>                                         231,530
<DEPRECIATION>                                 231,440
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 872,882
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,086,777
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        97,014
<OTHER-SE>                                    (606,709)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   872,882
<SALES>                                        567,678
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               568,068
<CGS>                                          537,407
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  537,407
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              29,390
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,271
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,271
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,271
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00
        


</TABLE>
1

Ngo, Dan (FAA)

From: Ralph Apel <Ralph@ReeceNichols.com>

Sent: Thursday, October 08, 2015 3:32 PM

To: Ngo, Dan (FAA)

Subject: RE: Condition 16

Mr. Ngo:

I would like to withdraw my Request for Revision of Exemption 11410.

Thank you for all your help!

Ralph J. Apel

11901 119th Street 

Overland Park, KS 66213 

(913) 402-2314 (office)

(913) 579-4529 (cell) 

Rewarding Lives 

 

http://ralph.reeceandnichols.com

Get a free MyNeighborhood Report

 

Licensed in Kansas and Missouri

 

Download my new Home Search App by clicking the link below. This is a very cool new app that works on iPhones, 

Androids and iPads and is GPS based with lots and lots of information on the homes. Good when used in Kansas and 

Missouri in the Kansas City Metro area. 

http://App.ReeceAndNichols.com/ralph 

From: Dan.Ngo@faa.gov [mailto:Dan.Ngo@faa.gov] 

Sent: Thursday, October 08, 2015 12:59 PM 

To: Ralph Apel 

Subject: RE: Condition 16 

Mr. Apel,  

Please see Condition 16 near the top of Page 5 of your exemption (attached).  
2

Dan Ngo

Office of Rulemaking, Aircraft and Airport Rules Division  

Federal Aviation Administration

202.267.4264

From: Ralph Apel [mailto:Ralph@ReeceNichols.com] 

Sent: Thursday, October 08, 2015 1:56 PM 

To: Ngo, Dan (FAA) 

Subject: Condition 16 

Mr. Ngo:

I have been looking to condition #16 to see if it covers my concerns and petition for revision of exemption 11410 but I

cannot find it. Can you please tell me where to find it in FAR?

Thanks,

Ralph J. Apel

11901 119th Street 

Overland Park, KS 66213 

(913) 402-2314 (office)

(913) 579-4529 (cell) 

Rewarding Lives 

 

http://ralph.reeceandnichols.com

Get a free MyNeighborhood Report

 

Licensed in Kansas and Missouri

 

Download my new Home Search App by clicking the link below. This is a very cool new app that works on iPhones, 

Androids and iPads and is GPS based with lots and lots of information on the homes. Good when used in Kansas and 

Missouri in the Kansas City Metro area. 

http://App.ReeceAndNichols.com/ralph
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk April 23, 2012

h0416 

# Order

April 23, 2012

143896 & (75)

WILLIAM ADAM, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of MARGARET ADAM, Plaintiff-Appellant/Cross-Appellee,

v SC: 143896 COA: 292144 Macomb CC: 2007-001381-NO SISTERS OF BON SECOURS NURSING CARE CENTER, Defendant-Appellee/Cross-Appellant.

___________________ _________________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the September 6, 2011 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The application for leave to appeal as cross-appellant is therefore moot and is DENIED.

H ATHAWAY



### , J., would grant leave to appeal.
AAM-13-375-E

June 06, 2013

 Exemption No. 10790

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2013-0438

Ms. Ann Moseley Rychlik

Drug Program Manager

American Helicopters, Inc.

10503 Wakeman Drive

Manassas, Virginia 20110

Dear Ms. Rychlik:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our 

decision, explains its basis, and gives you the conditions and limitations of the exemption, 

including the date it ends.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated April 22, 2013, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on 

behalf of American Helicopters, Inc. (American Helicopters) for an exemption from part 120

of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) to the extent necessary to allow American

Helicopters to cover its safety-sensitive employees under one drug and alcohol testing 

program.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent, and any 

delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to American Helicopters.

The FAA has issued a grant of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to 

those presented in your petition. In Grant of Exemption No. 9703 (copy enclosed), the FAA 

found that Solid Edge’s § 91.147 air tour operations were closely connected to its part 135 

operations. The FAA also found that combining the petitioner’s two drug and alcohol testing 

programs into one would be in the public interest and would maintain an equivalent level of 
2

safety to that provided by the current regulations. Thus, the FAA concluded it was 

unnecessary to burden the petitioner by requiring it to conduct two separate testing programs.

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that—

• they are similar in all material respects to relief previously requested in the enclosed Grant 

of Exemption No. 9703;

• the reasons stated by the FAA for granting the enclosed Grant of Exemption No. 9703 also 

apply to the situation you present; and 

• a grant of exemption is in the public interest.

Our Decision

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator 

has delegated to me, I hereby grant American Helicopters, Inc. an exemption from 

14 CFR part 120 to the extent necessary to allow American Helicopters to cover its safetysensitive employees under one drug and alcohol testing program, subject to the conditions and 

limitations described below.

Conditions and Limitations 

1. Employees of American Helicopters are subject to the drug and alcohol regulations 

at all times while conducting operations under part 135 or part 91.

2. The drug and alcohol program must be implemented under the same auspices of 

the American Helicopters part 135 operation, not under part 91.

This exemption terminates on June 30, 2015, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

James R. Fraser, M.D.

Deputy Federal Air Surgeon

Enclosure
1219.800 General. ( e ) The Small Business Administration (SBA) and Department of Transportation (DOT) have entered into a Partnership Agreement (PA) delegating SBA's contract execution and administrative functions to DOT. Contracting officers shall follow the alternate procedures in this subpart, as applicable, to award 8(a) contracts under the PA. (*See https://www.transportation.gov/sites/dot.dev/files/docs/Department%20of%20Transportation_Partnership%20Agreement.pdf .*) ( 1 ) The SBA delegates only the authority to sign contracts on its behalf. Consistent with the provisions of the PA, the SBA remains the prime contractor on all 8(a) contracts, continues to determine eligibility of concerns for contract award, and retains appeal rights under FAR 19.810.
( 2 ) The PA sets forth the delegation of authority and establishes the basic procedures for expediting the award of 8(a) contract requirements as reflected in this subpart.
( 3 ) Contracts awarded under the PA may be awarded directly to the 8(a) participant on either a sole source or competitive basis. An SBA signature on the contract is not required. *See* FAR 19.811-3 for contract clauses to use.
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.



## United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2009-5021, -5022, -5023 ALABAMA AIRCRAFT INDUSTRIES, INC. - BIRMINGHAM, Plaintiff-Cross Appellant,

v. UNITED STATES,

Defendant-Appellant, and THE BOEING COMPANY,

Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims in 08-CV-470,

Judge Charles F. Lettow. ON MOTION 

### ORDER The United States moves without opposition for a 14-day extension of time, until May 28, 2009, to file its response to Alabama Aircraft Industries, Inc. — Birmingham's motion to dismiss. Upon consideration thereof, IT IS ORDERED THAT: The motion for an extension of time is granted. 

## MAY 22 2009 FOR THE COURT /s/ Jan Horbalv U.OT801l AL ItLU•TF" Date Jan Horbaly Clerk

MAY 2 2 2009 Jetli HORBALY CLERKcc: David R. HazeIton, Esq.

Scott M. McCaleb, Esq. Douglas K. Mickle, Esq. s19

2009-5021, -5022, -5023 - 2
EXHIBIT
23.1








CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING
FIRM











We have
issued our report dated March 31, 2009, accompanying the consolidated financial
statements included in the Annual Report of Access Pharmaceuticals, Inc. on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.  We hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statements of
Access Pharmaceuticals, Inc. on Form S-1 (File Nos. 333-149633, 333-125349, and
333-135734), Form S-3 (File Nos. 333-92210, 333-39330, 333-37786, 333-52030,
333-95413, 333-64904, and 333-113909), Form S-4 (File Nos. 333-155885 and
333-143587), and Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-45646, 333-75136, 333-125796, and
333-114269).














Dallas,
Texas


March 31,
2009
EXHIBIT
32
















CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18
U.S.C.


SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002





This
certification set forth below is hereby made solely for the purposes of
satisfying the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 and may not be relied upon or used for any other purposes.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Access Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and will be retained by Access Pharmaceuticals,
Inc. and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon its request.





Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Public Company Accounting Reform and Investor Act of 2002
(18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted, the “Sarbanes-Oxley Act”), Jeffrey B. Davis, Chief
Executive Officer of Access Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the "Company"), and Stephen
B. Thompson, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each
hereby certifies that to his knowledge the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
period ended December 31, 2009 of the Company filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report") fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for
the period specified.





Signed at
the City of  Dallas, in the State of Texas, this 22 nd day of March,
2010.











Jeffrey
B.
Davis                                                                        Stephen
B. Thompson


Chief
Executive
Officer                                                           Chief
Financial Officer


Principal
Executive
Officer                                                     Principal
Financial and Accounting Officer
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Larry E. Finger, the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Federal Realty Investment Trust (the Company), has executed this certification in connection with the filing with the Securities and
Exchange Commission of the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006 (the Report). The undersigned hereby certifies that:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|               |  |                                                                                                     
|-------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|               |  | /s/ Larry E. Finger                                                                                 
|August 2, 2006 |  | Larry E. Finger, Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer (Principal Accounting Officer)
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report of Jo-Ann Stores, Inc.
(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 30, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) on or about the date
hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned officers of the Company
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to such officers knowledge:  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. Dated: December 7, 2004/s/ Alan RosskammAlan RosskammPresident and Chief Executive Officer/s/ Brian P. CarneyBrian P. CarneyExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
 A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon
request.
#### 1409.406 Debarment.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS AND STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED INCOME AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                       1,458,960
<SECURITIES>                                 2,082,963
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,640,660
<ALLOWANCES>                                   209,123
<INVENTORY>                                  4,097,722
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            11,629,260
<PP&E>                                      10,205,621
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,369,101
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              18,394,612
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,357,704
<BONDS>                                          2,798
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       470,330
<OTHER-SE>                                  16,288,680
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                18,394,612
<SALES>                                      8,419,798
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             8,419,798
<CGS>                                        3,837,027
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,668,162
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,103,964
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                29,501
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              32,050
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                745,275
<INCOME-TAX>                                   221,200
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            524,075
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   524,075
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .11
        

</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of Elbin Realty No. 2, Inc., Appellant, v. William E. Boyland et al., Constituting the Tax Commission of the City of New York, Respondents.

In a proceeding under article 78 of the CPLR, to compel the New York City Tax Commission to accept as timely filed the petitioner’s written protest against a real property tax assessment, and to require the said commission to act upon such protest, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered July 6, 1964 upon the opinion of the court, which denied its application and dismissed its petition. Order reversed on the law, without costs, and petition granted, without costs. The findings of fact implicit or contained in the opinion below are affirmed. Sections 160 and 163 of the New York City Charter provide that the assessment books shall be open for public inspection from February 1 until March 15, and that an application for correction of an assessment may be filed “ During the time that the books * * * are open for public inspection” (§ 163). In 1964, the date of March 15 fell on a Sunday. On Friday, March 13, petitioner mailed an application for correction of an assessment to the Tax Commission. The application was not received until Monday, March 16. The Tax Commission refused to act on it upon the ground that it was not timely filed. We believe the Tax Commission erred. It is our opinion that section 25-a of the General Construction Law is applicable to the situation at bar; and that by virtue of such section the filing time here was extended until Monday, March 16 *(Matter of Fay*v. *Boyland,*18 Misc 2d 150; *Matter of Zazzi*v. *Boyland,*N. Y. L. J., June 29, 1964, p. 13, col. 4). That being so, petitioner’s application was timely filed. Kleinfeld, Acting P. J., Christ, Hill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.