Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 184 / Thursday, September 23, 2010 / Notices 57945 

of [S,S]-ethylenediamine disuccinic acid 

tri-sodium salt (hereafter referred to as 

EDDS) (CAS No. 178949–82–1) under 40 

CFR 180.910 when used in accordance 

with good agricultural practices as a 

pesticide inert ingredient in pesticide 

formulations applied to growing crops 

or to raw agricultural commodities after 

harvest. An analytical method has not 

been proposed because EDDS residues 

harmful to plants and animals is highly 

unlikely to occur when it is applied as 

part of the proposed pesticide 

formulation and according to that 

formulation’s label directions for use. 

Contact: Alganesh Debesai, (703) 308– 

8353, e-mail address: 

debesai.alganesh@epa.gov. 

List of Subjects 

Environmental protection, 

Agricultural commodities, Feed 

additives, Food additives, Pesticides 

and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements. 

Dated: September 16, 2010. 

Lois Rossi, 

Director, Registration Division, Office of 

Pesticide Programs. 

[FR Doc. 2010–23862 Filed 9–22–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–S 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

[EPA–HQ–OPP–2010–0730; FRL–8844–5] 

Atonik and Verbenone, Registration 

Review Proposed Decisions; Notice of 

Availability 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: This notice announces the 

availability of EPA’s proposed 

registration review decisions for the 

pesticides listed in the table in Unit 

II.A. and opens a public comment 

period on the proposed decisions. 

Registration review is EPA’s periodic 

review of pesticide registrations to 

ensure that each pesticide continues to 

satisfy the statutory standard for 

registration, that is, that the pesticide 

can perform its intended function 

without unreasonable adverse effects on 

human health or the environment. 

Through this program, EPA is ensuring 

that each pesticide’s registration is 

based on current scientific and other 

knowledge, including its effects on 

human health and the environment. 

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before November 22, 2010. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by the docket identification 

(ID) number for the specific pesticide of 

interest provided in the table in Unit 

II.A. by one of the following methods: 

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// 

www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line 

instructions for submitting comments. 

• Mail: Office of Pesticide Programs 

(OPP) Regulatory Public Docket (7502P), 

Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 

Pennsylvania Ave., NW, Washington, 

DC 20460–0001. 

• Delivery: OPP Regulatory Public 

Docket (7502P), Environmental 

Protection Agency, Rm. S–4400, One 

Potomac Yard (South Bldg.), 2777 S. 

Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. Deliveries 

are only accepted during the Docket 

Facility’s normal hours of operation 

(8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through 

Friday, excluding legal holidays). 

Special arrangements should be made 

for deliveries of boxed information. The 

Docket Facility telephone number is 

(703) 305–5805. 

Instructions: Direct your comments to 

the docket identification (ID) number for 

the specific pesticide of interest 

provided in the table in Unit II.A. EPA’s 

policy is that all comments received 

will be included in the docket without 

change and may be made available online at http://www.regulations.gov, 

including any personal information 

provided, unless the comment includes 

information claimed to be Confidential 

Business Information (CBI) or other 

information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. Do not submit 

information that you consider to be CBI 

or otherwise protected through 

regulations.gov or e-mail. The 

regulations.gov website is an 

‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which 

means EPA will not know your identity 

or contact information unless you 

provide it in the body of your comment. 

If you send an e-mail comment directly 

to EPA without going through 

regulations.gov, your e-mail address 

will be automatically captured and 

included as part of the comment that is 

placed in the docket and made available 

on the Internet. If you submit an 

electronic comment, EPA recommends 

that you include your name and other 

contact information in the body of your 

comment and with any disk or CD-ROM 

you submit. If EPA cannot read your 

comment due to technical difficulties 

and cannot contact you for clarification, 

EPA may not be able to consider your 

comment. Electronic files should avoid 

the use of special characters, any form 

of encryption, and be free of any defects 

or viruses. 

Docket: All documents in the docket 

are listed in the docket index available 

at http://www.regulations.gov. Although 

listed in the index, some information is 

not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other 

information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. Certain other 

material, such as copyrighted material, 

is not placed on the Internet and will be 

publicly available only in hard copy 

form. Publicly available docket 

materials are available either in the 

electronic docket at http:// 

www.regulations.gov, or, if only 

available in hard copy, at the OPP 

Regulatory Public Docket in Rm. S– 

4400, One Potomac Yard (South Bldg.), 

2777 S. Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. The 

hours of operation of this Docket 

Facility are from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., 

Monday through Friday, excluding legal 

holidays. The Docket Facility telephone 

number is (703) 305–5805. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For 

pesticide specific information, contact: 

The Regulatory Action Leader for the 

pesticide of interest identified in the 

table in Unit II.A. 

For general information on the 

registration review program, contact: 

Kevin Costello, Pesticide Re-evaluation 

Division (7508P), Office of Pesticide 

Programs, Environmental Protection 

Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., 

Washington, DC 20460–0001; telephone 

number: (703) 305–5026; fax number: 

(703) 308–8090; e-mail address: 

costello.kevin@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. General Information 

A. Does this Action Apply to Me? 

This action is directed to the public 

in general, and may be of interest to a 

wide range of stakeholders including 

environmental, human health, farm 

worker, and agricultural advocates; the 

chemical industry; pesticide users; and 

members of the public interested in the 

sale, distribution, or use of pesticides. 

Since others also may be interested, the 

Agency has not attempted to describe all 

the specific entities that may be affected 

by this action. If you have any questions 

regarding the applicability of this action 

to a particular entity, consult the 

chemical review manager listed under 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. 

B. What Should I Consider as I Prepare 

My Comments for EPA? 

1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this 

information to EPA through 

regulations.gov or e-mail. Clearly mark 

the part or all of the information that 

you claim to be CBI. For CBI 

information in a disk or CD-ROM that 

you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the 

disk or CD-ROM as CBI and then 

identify electronically within the disk or 

CD-ROM the specific information that is 

claimed as CBI. In addition to one 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
57946 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 184 / Thursday, September 23, 2010 / Notices 

complete version of the comment that 

includes information claimed as CBI, a 

copy of the comment that does not 

contain the information claimed as CBI 

must be submitted for inclusion in the 

public docket. Information so marked 

will not be disclosed except in 

accordance with procedures set forth in 

40 CFR part 2. 

2. Tips for preparing your comments. 

When submitting comments, remember 

to: 

i. Identify the document by docket ID 

number and other identifying 

information (subject heading, Federal 

Register date and page number). 

ii. Follow directions. The Agency may 

ask you to respond to specific questions 

or organize comments by referencing a 

Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) part 

or section number. 

iii. Explain why you agree or disagree; 

suggest alternatives and substitute 

language for your requested changes. 

iv. Describe any assumptions and 

provide any technical information and/ 

or data that you used. 

v. If you estimate potential costs or 

burdens, explain how you arrived at 

your estimate in sufficient detail to 

allow for it to be reproduced. 

vi. Provide specific examples to 

illustrate your concerns and suggest 

alternatives. 

vii. Explain your views as clearly as 

possible, avoiding the use of profanity 

or personal threats. 

viii. Make sure to submit your 

comments by the comment period 

deadline identified. 

II. Background 

A. What Action is the Agency Taking? 

Pursuant to 40 CFR 155.58, this notice 

announces the availability of EPA’s 

proposed registration review decisions 

for the pesticides shown in the 

following table, and opens a 60–day 

public comment period on the proposed 

decisions. 

Atonik, plant growth regulators 

(PGRs) consist of three naturallyoccurring nitrophenolates: Sodium 5- 

nitroguaiacolate, sodium onitrophenolate, and sodium pnitrophenolate. The PGRs in atonik are 

simple synthetic nitrophenols 

solubilized in sodium hydroxide. 

Atonik is intended for use on cotton, 

rice, and soybean plants. 

The verbenone & 4-allyl anisole 

registration review case contains 2 

active seperate ingredients, verbenone 

and 4-allyl anisole. Verbenone is a 

terpene that acts as an anti-aggregation 

pheromone in Dendroctonus and Lps 

species. Verbenone is used on pine trees 

in forests to control bark beetles, such 

as the southern pine beetle 

Dendroctonus frontalis. 4-allyl anisole is 

an alkenylbenzene compound that is 

produced by conifers during bark beetle 

Dendroctonus sp. infestations. 4-allyl 

anisole acts as an anti-aggregation agent 

by signaling the beetles that the tree has 

already been colonized and therefore is 

an unsuitable host. There is one 

manufacturing use product that is 

registered containing the active 

ingredient and there are no registered 

end use products that are being 

produced, sold, distributed, or used. 

REGISTRATION REVIEW PROPOSED FINAL DECISIONS

Registration Review Case Name 

and Number Pesticide Docket ID Number Chemical Review Manager, Telephone Number, E-mail Address 

Atonik (6067) EPA–HQ–OPP–2008–0832 Driss Benmhend, (703) 308–9525, 

benmhend.driss@epa.gov 

Verbenone & 4-Allyl Anisole 

(6031) 

EPA–HQ–OPP–2009–0511 Leonard Cole, (703) 305–5412, 

cole.leonard@epa.gov 

The registration review docket for a 

pesticide includes earlier documents 

related to the registration review of the 

case. For example, the review opened 

with the posting of a Summary 

Document, containing a Preliminary 

Work Plan, for public comment. A Final 

Work Plan was posted to the docket 

following public comment on the initial 

docket. The documents in the initial 

dockets described the Agency’s 

rationales for not conducting additional 

risk assessments for the registration 

review of the pesticides included in the 

table in Unit II.A. These proposed 

registration review decisions continue 

to be supported by those rationales 

included in documents in the initial 

dockets. 

Following public comment, the 

Agency will issue final registration 

review decisions for products 

containing the pesticides listed in the 

table in Unit II.A. 

The registration review program is 

being conducted under congressionally 

mandated time frames, and EPA 

recognizes the need both to make timely 

decisions and to involve the public. 

Section 3(g) of the Federal Insecticide, 

Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act 

(FIFRA), as amended, required EPA to 

establish by regulation procedures for 

reviewing pesticide registrations, 

originally with a goal of reviewing each 

pesticide’s registration every 15 years to 

ensure that a pesticide continues to 

meet the FIFRA standard for 

registration. The Agency’s final rule to 

implement this program was issued in 

August 2006 and became effective in 

October 2006, and appears at 40 CFR 

part 155, subpart C. The Pesticide 

Registration Improvement Act of 2003 

(PRIA) was amended and extended in 

September 2007. FIFRA, as amended by 

PRIA in 2007, requires EPA to complete 

registration review decisions by October 

1, 2022, for all pesticides registered as 

of October 1, 2007. 

The registration review final rule at 40 

CFR 155.58(a) provides for a minimum 

60–day public comment period on all 

proposed registration review decisions. 

This comment period is intended to 

provide an opportunity for public input 

and a mechanism for initiating any 

necessary amendments to the proposed 

decision. All comments should be 

submitted using the methods in 

ADDRESSES, and must be received by 

EPA on or before the closing date. These 

comments will become part of the 

docket for the pesticides included in the 

table in Unit II.A. Comments received 

after the close of the comment period 

will be marked ‘‘late.’’ EPA is not 

required to consider these late 

comments. 

The Agency will carefully consider all 

comments received by the closing date 

and will provide a ‘‘Response to 

Comments Memorandum’’ in the docket. 

The final registration review decision 

will explain the effect that any 

comments had on the decision and 

provide the Agency’s response to 

significant comments. 

Background on the registration review 

program is provided at: http:// 

www.epa.gov/oppsrrd1/ 

registration_review. Links to earlier 

documents related to the registration 

review of these pesticides are provided 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 184 / Thursday, September 23, 2010 / Notices 57947 

at: http://www.epa.gov/oppsrrd1/ 

registration_review/ 

reg_review_status.htm. 

B. What is the Agency’s Authority for 

Taking this Action? 

Section 3(g) of FIFRA and 40 CFR part 

155, subpart C, provide authority for 

this action. 

List of Subjects 

Environmental protection, 

Administrative practice and procedure, 

Pesticides and pests. 

Dated: September 16, 2010. 

W. Michael McDavit, 

Acting Director, Biopesticide and Pollution 

Prevention Division, Office of Pesticide 

Programs. 

[FR Doc. 2010–23810 Filed 9–22–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–S 

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 

COMMISSION 

Notice of Public Information 

Collection(s) Being Reviewed by the 

Federal Communications Commission, 

Comments Requested 

September 17, 2010. 

SUMMARY: The Federal Communications 

Commission, as part of its continuing 

effort to reduce paperwork burden 

invites the general public and other 

Federal agencies to take this 

opportunity to comment on the 

following information collection(s), as 

required by the Paperwork Reduction 

Act (PRA) of 1995, 44 U.S.C. 3501 – 

3520. Comments are requested 

concerning: (a) whether the proposed 

collection of information is necessary 

for the proper performance of the 

functions of the Commission, including 

whether the information shall have 

practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the 

Commission’s burden estimate; (c) ways 

to enhance the quality, utility, and 

clarity of the information collected; (d) 

ways to minimize the burden of the 

collection of information on the 

respondents, including the use of 

automated collection techniques or 

other forms of information technology, 

and (e) ways to further reduce the 

information collection burden on small 

business concerns with fewer than 25 

employees. 

The FCC may not conduct or sponsor 

a collection of information unless it 

displays a currently valid control 

number. No person shall be subject to 

any penalty for failing to comply with 

a collection of information subject to the 

Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) that 

does not display a currently valid OMB 

control number. 

DATES: Written Paperwork Reduction 

Act (PRA) comments should be 

submitted on or before November 22, 

2010. If you anticipate that you will be 

submitting PRA comments, but find it 

difficult to do so within the period of 

time allowed by this notice, you should 

advise the FCC contact listed below as 

soon as possible. 

ADDRESSES: Direct all PRA comments to 

Nicholas A. Fraser, Office of 

Management and Budget, via fax at 202– 

395–5167 or via the Internet at 

Nicholas_A._Fraser@omb.eop.gov and 

to the Federal Communications 

Commission via email to PRA@fcc.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Judith B. Herman, Office of Managing 

Director, (202) 418–0214. For additional 

information, contact Judith B. Herman, 

OMD, 202–418–0214 or email judith– 

b.herman@fcc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

OMB Control Number: 3060–1058. 

Title: FCC Application or Notification 

for Spectrum Leasing Arrangement: 

Wireless Telecommunications Bureau 

and/or Public Safety and Homeland 

Security Bureau. 

Form No.: FCC Form 608. 

Type of Review: Revision of a 

currently approved collection. 

Respondents: Business or other for– 

profit, not–for–profit institutions, and 

state, local or tribal government. 

Number of Respondents and 

Responses: 991 respondents; 991 

responses. 

Estimated Time Per Response: 5 

hours. 

Frequency of Response: On occasion 

reporting requirement, recordkeeping 

requirement. 

Obligation to Respond: Required to 

obtain or retain benefits. Statutory 

authority for this information collection 

is contained in 47 U.S.C. sections 151, 

154(i), 154(j), 155, 161, 301, 303(r), 308, 

309, 310, 332 and 503. 

Total Annual Burden: 4,955 hours. 

Total Annual Cost: $910,400. 

Privacy Act Impact Assessment: N/A. 

Nature and Extent of Confidentiality: 

In general there is no need for 

confidentiality. On a case–by–case 

basis, the Commission may be required 

to withhold from disclosure certain 

information about the location, 

character, or ownership of a historic 

property, including traditional religious 

sites. 

Needs and Uses: The Commission 

will submit this revised information 

collection to the Office of Management 

and Budget (OMB) after this comment 

period to obtain OMB approval. The 

Commission is reporting a 3,200 hour 

burden reduction adjustment which is 

due to 632 fewer respondents. 

The revision to the FCC Form 608 is 

due to rewording of data elements, 

adding a question inquiring if filing is 

the lead application on the Main Form, 

and changing language in the 

instructions. 

FCC Form 608 is a multi–purpose 

form. It is used to provide notification 

or request approval for any spectrum 

leasing arrangement (’Leases’) entered 

into between an existing licensee 

(’Licensee’) in certain wireless services 

and a spectrum lessee (’Lessee’). This 

form also is required to notify or request 

approval for any spectrum subleasing 

arrangement (’Sublease’). 

The data collected on the form is used 

by the FCC to determine whether the 

public interest would be served by the 

Lease or Sublease. The form is also used 

to provide notification for any Private 

Commons Arrangement entered into 

between a Licensee, Lessee, or 

Sublessee and a class of third–party 

users (as defined in Section 1.9080 of 

the Commission’s rules). 

Federal Communications Commission. 

Marlene H. Dortch, 

Secretary, 

Office of the Secretary, 

Office of Managing Director. 

[FR Doc. 2010–23800 Filed 9–22–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6712–01–S 

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 

COMMISSION 

[AU Docket No. 10–147; DA 10–1351] 

Auction of VHF Commercial Television 

Station Construction Permits 

Scheduled for February 15, 2011; 

Comment Sought on Competitive 

Bidding Procedures for Auction 90 

AGENCY: Federal Communications 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: This document announces the 

auction of certain VHF construction 

permits scheduled to commence on 

February 15, 2011 (Auction 90). This 

document also seeks comment on 

competitive bidding procedures for 

Auction 90. 

DATES: Comments are due on or before 

September 30, 2010, and reply 

comments are due on or before October 

15, 2010. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, 

identified by AU Docket No. 10–147, by 

any of the following methods: 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES