alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

                                                                 EXHIBIT 3(i)(2)

         FILED
  IN THE OFFICE OF THE
SECRETARY OF STATE OF THE
    STATE OF NEVADA

    NOV - [_] 1983
         /s/
     [2682-80]
     ---------

                                                     Filing Fee $50.00
                                                     BY Tomahawk Oil
                                                     & Minerals
                                                     Suite 110
                                                     77 North Oak Knoll
                                                     Pasaden, California
                                                     91101
                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                       OF
                            ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                         TOMAHAWK OIL AND MINERALS, INC.
                             (a Nevada corporation)

     At a duly constituted meeting of the Shareholders of Tomahawk Oil and
Minerals, Inc., held on October 5, 1983, the following amend- ments to the
Articles of Incorporation of said Corporation were ap- proved:

     1. After motion duly made and seconded, the following resolution was
adopted by a vote of 29,375,932 shares in favor and 126,625 shares opposed, with
303,125 shares abstaining:

               "RESOLVED, that paragraph 1. of the
               Articles of Incorporation is amended,
               in its entirety, as follows:

                  1. Name: The Name of the corpora-
                     ----
                     tion is TOMAHAWK INDUSTRIES, INC."

     2. After motion duly made and seconded, the following resolution was
adopted by a vote of 28, 207,404 in favor and 1,180,639 shares opposed, with
417,635 shares abstaining:

               "RESOLVED, that the first sentence of Article 4 of the Articles
               of Incorpora- tion is amended, in its entirety, as follows:

                   4. Capital Stock: The total authorized
                      -------------
                      capital stock of the Corporation shall consist of
                      200,000,000 shares, having a par value of $ .001 per
                      share."

     We, the undersigned, hereby certify that the following is a true Copy of
the resolution adopted by the Shareholders of the above-men- tioned Corporation
at a meeting of said Shareholders held on the afore- Mentioned date, and that
the same was entered in the regular minute Book of the said Corporation, now in
full force and effect, and that The Shareholders of the Corporation have, and at
the time of the adop- tion of said resolution had, full power and lawful
authority to adopt the said resolution.

                                   /s/ David T. Laurance
                                   -----------------------------------
                                   DAVID T. LAURANCE, President of the
                                   Board of Directors of Tomahawk Oil
                                   and Minerals, Inc.

                                      - 1 -
```
#### BRONNER v. HIRSCH.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.

June 22, 1903.)

1. Conveyances—Enceoachment—Agreement foe Release—Deposit — Extension of Time—Consideration—Action foe Deposit.

There being an encroachment on property conveyed, the grantor deposited a certain sum for the benefit of the grantee, to be returned on delivery of a release of the land affected by the encroachment before a certain date. Held, that an extension of time made after such date, and without valuable consideration, was no ground for a recovery of the deposit, in an action brought after tender of the release, subsequent to the time originally specified.

Appeal from City Court of New York.

Action by Ida Koehler Bronner against William Hirsch. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff, defendant appeals. Reversed.

Argued before FREEDMAN, P. J., and GILDERSLEEVE and MacLEAN, JJ.

Meyer M. Friend, for appellant.

Myers, Goldsmith & Bronner, for respondent.

MacLEAN, J.

Upon the sale and conveyance on April 4, 1901, of certain property by the plaintiff to the defendant, and the discovery of the existence of an encroachment, the parties appear to have agreed, as appears from the allegations of the complaint and the depositary’s certificate in evidence, to the deposit of $400 by the plaintiff with a third person, the Title Guarantee & Trust Company, for the benefit of the defendant, to be returned to the plaintiff upon the delivery of a proper release of the land affected by the encroachment “on or before April 1, 1902.” “If she fails,” reads the certificate, “to deliver said agreement on or before that date, and an extension of time be not granted to her or the Title Guarantee -& Trust Company upon reasonable cause shown, then said deposit is to be paid to said Hirsch.” The plaintiff alleges that prior to April 1, 1902, she represented her inability to procure the release because of some difficulty in reaching the parties who were to execute it, and that thereupon the defendant, “for a good and .valuable consideration, duly extended plaintiff’s time on and after April 1, 1902, within which to procure said agreement, and promised and agreed to and with the plaintiff to accept said agreement after April 1, 1902,” and that on *140or about June 8, 1902, she tendered a proper release, demanded the return of the sum deposited, and met with refusal. Too late! There is no evidence of any extension whatever by the defendant himself, and, granting proof of an extension by the third person, the Title Guarantee & Trust Company, even with authority so to act, there is no evidence of such extension prior to April 1, 1902. Whatever, if any, extension there was by that company, was after that date, and was not with good and valuable consideration as alleged, and as the law requires. The direction of a verdict in favor of the plaintiff was therefore against the evidence and the law, and the judgment entered thereon must be reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to abide the event.

Judgment reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event. All concur.
### §1404. Persons born in Alaska on or after March 30, 1867

A person born in Alaska on or after March 30, 1867, except a noncitizen Indian, is a citizen of the United States at birth. A noncitizen Indian born in Alaska on or after March 30, 1867, and prior to June 2, 1924, is declared to be a citizen of the United States as of June 2, 1924. An Indian born in Alaska on or after June 2, 1924, is a citizen of the United States at birth.

(June 27, 1952, ch. 477, title III, ch. 1, §304, 66 Stat. 237.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Admission of Alaska as State

Alaska Statehood provisions as not repealing, amending, or modifying the provisions of this section, see section 24 of Pub. L. 85–508, July 7, 1958, 72 Stat. 339, set out as a note preceding former section 21 of Title 48, Territories and Insular Possessions.
<PAGE>


                                  Exhibit 23.1




                         Consent of Independent Auditors




The Board of Directors
AM Communications, Inc.


We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements on Form
S-8 (No.333-35988 and No. 333-32826) of AM Communications, Inc. of our report
dated June 30, 1999 relating to the balance sheet of AM Communications, Inc. as
of April 3, 1999, and the related statements of operations, stockholders'
equity, and cash flows for the year ended April 3, 1999 which report is included
in the April 1, 2000 Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of AM Communications, Inc.






KPMG LLP
Allentown, Pennsylvania
July 11, 2000
### §428b. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 428b was editorially reclassified as section 5942 of this title.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Larry Cheshire, Appellant.

[833 NYS2d 422]

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (McGann, J.), imposed August 9, 2005, on the ground that the sentence is excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed. No opinion. Prudenti, EJ., Crane, Santucci, Fisher and Garni, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>


[PEAT MARWICK LLP LETTERHEAD]

                                                    Exhibit 23.1


                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



The Board of Directors
California Bancshares, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements:

      No. 33-48708 on Form S-8      Incentive Stock Option Plan
      No. 33-20209 on Form S-3      Dividend Reinvestment Plan
      No. 33-41504 on Form S-8      Director's Stock Option Plan

of California Bancshares, Inc. of our report dated January 17, 1996, except 
Note 14, which is as of February 12, 1996, relating to the consolidated 
balance sheet of California Bancshares, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 
31, 1995 and 1994, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes 
in shareholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three 
year period ended December 31, 1995, which report appears in the December 31, 
1995 annual report on Form 10-K of California Bancshares, Inc.


                                         KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP


March 25, 1996
EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                FEDERAL MORTGAGE CORPORATION OF PUERTO RICO, INC.
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Federal Mortgage Corporation of
Puerto Rico, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December
31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael Schumacher, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/ Michael Schumacher
------------------------------------------------
Michael Schumacher
Treasurer, Secretary and Chief Financial Officer
February 17, 2006
# FOIA Log_August 2021
Case: 1:11-cv-07755 Document #: 1 Filed: 11/01/11 Page 1 of 8 PageID #:1

Case: 1:11-cv-07755 Document #: 1 Filed: 11/01/11 Page 2 of 8 PageID #:1

Case: 1:11-cv-07755 Document #: 1 Filed: 11/01/11 Page 3 of 8 PageID #:1

Case: 1:11-cv-07755 Document #: 1 Filed: 11/01/11 Page 4 of 8 PageID #:1

Case: 1:11-cv-07755 Document #: 1 Filed: 11/01/11 Page 5 of 8 PageID #:1

Case: 1:11-cv-07755 Document #: 1 Filed: 11/01/11 Page 6 of 8 PageID #:1

Case: 1:11-cv-07755 Document #: 1 Filed: 11/01/11 Page 7 of 8 PageID #:1

Case: 1:11-cv-07755 Document #: 1 Filed: 11/01/11 Page 8 of 8 PageID #:1
### §1257. Adjustment of status of certain resident aliens to nonimmigrant status; exceptions

(a) The status of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence shall be adjusted by the Attorney General, under such regulations as he may prescribe, to that of a nonimmigrant under paragraph (15)(A), (E), or (G) of section 1101(a) of this title, if such alien had at the time of admission or subsequently acquires an occupational status which would, if he were seeking admission to the United States, entitle him to a nonimmigrant status under such paragraphs. As of the date of the Attorney General's order making such adjustment of status, the Attorney General shall cancel the record of the alien's admission for permanent residence, and the immigrant status of such alien shall thereby be terminated.

(b) The adjustment of status required by subsection (a) shall not be applicable in the case of any alien who requests that he be permitted to retain his status as an immigrant and who, in such form as the Attorney General may require, executes and files with the Attorney General a written waiver of all rights, privileges, exemptions, and immunities under any law or any executive order which would otherwise accrue to him because of the acquisition of an occupational status entitling him to a nonimmigrant status under paragraph (15)(A), (E), or (G) of section 1101(a) of this title.

(June 27, 1952, ch. 477, title II, ch. 5, §247, 66 Stat. 218; Pub. L. 104–208, div. C, title III, §308(f)(1)(P), Sept. 30, 1996, 110 Stat. 3009–621.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1996—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 104–208 substituted "time of admission" for "time of entry".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1996 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 104–208 effective, with certain transitional provisions, on the first day of the first month beginning more than 180 days after Sept. 30, 1996, see section 309 of Pub. L. 104–208, set out as a note under section 1101 of this title.

#### Abolition of Immigration and Naturalization Service and Transfer of Functions

For abolition of Immigration and Naturalization Service, transfer of functions, and treatment of related references, see note set out under section 1551 of this title.
§ 761.12 Ships: Group authorizations. Ships or other craft in the following categories, except those ships which have been denied individual authorization or have had a prior authorization revoked, may enter the defense areas indicated without individual authorizations: ( a ) U.S. Public vessels, to enter all defense areas.
( b ) U.S. private vessels which are: ( 1 ) Under charter to the Department of Defense (including the Military Sealift Command), or
( 2 ) operating under a contract or charter with the Department of Defense providing for the employment of such vessels, or
( 3 ) routed by a Naval Control of Shipping Office, or
( 4 ) employed exclusively in support of and in connection with a Department of Defense construction, maintenance, or repair contract and whose crews carry individual entry clearances, to enter defense areas as authorized by controlling Defense Department agency.
( c ) [Reserved]
( d ) Privately owned local craft, registered with and licensed by appropriate local U.S. Government authorities, and owned and operated by local inhabitants who have been granted an authorization to enter the local defense area at the discretion of the local commanders.
( e ) Foreign flag ships traveling on diplomatic or other special clearance or for which special arrangements have been made under international agreements or treaties.
( f ) Ships operating under a group authorization issued by the Chief of Naval Operations.
( g ) Ships in distress, subject to local clearances and control by senior officer present.
[28 FR 13778, Dec. 18, 1963, as amended at 36 FR 21890, Nov. 17, 1971]
#### In the Matter of Marjorie Weinberger, Mother on Behalf of Louise Weinberger and Another, Respondent-Appellant, v. Herbert Weinberger, Appellant-Respondent.

Order, entered June 24, 1964, modified on the law, the facts and in the exercise of discretion as hereinafter indicated, and as so modified is otherwise affirmed, without costs. (1) The first ordering paragraph of said order appealed from is modified to provide that respondent pay or cause to be paid to the Support Bureau for and toward the support of Louise and Thomas Weinberger, his children^ the sum of $25 per week for each child, and (2) the third ordering paragraph of said order appealed from is modified to direct that respondent pay to -petitioner’s attorney the sum of $400 as *869and for a counsel fee. The provisions of the second ordering paragraph directing payments by the respondent toward the expense of orthodontia and psychotherapy for Thomas Weinberger remain unchanged. By reason of the modifications as indicated the respondent will be presently paying a total sum of $50 per week for the basic care and support of the infant children plus the sum of $5 per week towards the expense of orthodontia for Thomas Weinberger so long as he shall receive it and continue to need it, and the additional sum of $15 per week towards the expense of psychotherapy for Thomas Weinberger so long as he shall receive it and continue to need it, beginning at the time provided for in the order appealed from. By the terms of the order as modified respondent will be paying a total sum of $70 per week for the care and support of the infant children. This fairly reflects the measure of care and support in accordance with respondent’s means, which he would be obliged to assume if the parties were not divorced and the children were still in the home. The parties had agreed upon the sum of $40 per week for the support of the children at the time of the separation and this provision was included in the decree of divorce subsequently obtained by the petitioner. Respondent at all times met that obligation. Petitioner brought this proceeding for an increase, which was allowed as indicated. The measure and amount of the increase, the nature of the proceeding, the amount of legal effort required, and the means of respondent which are but slightly improved from that found in the previous order, persuades us that the counsel fee allowed was unreasonable. For that reason the allowance is modified as above set forth. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Yalente, Stevens and Steuer, JJ.; McNally, J., dissents in part in the following memorandum: I dissent, in part, and vote to affirm the support award. The parties were married in 1946 and there are two children of the marriage, 13 and 10. The father admits to earnings of $15,600 per year and additional income of $800 from investments, making a total of $16,400. Even if the trial court’s decision was based solely on a finding of changed circumstances, the all-inclusive support award of $90 weekly is amply supported by the record. Settle order on notice.
Amendment #1 to Form of Exchange Agreement



 Exhibit 10.11 
 AMENDMENT NO. 1 
 TO EXCHANGE AGREEMENT 
 This Amendment No. 1 to EXCHANGE AGREEMENT amends as of
                    , 2006 the Exchange Agreement dated as of November 18, 2005 (the “Agreement”) by and between Chicken
Acquisition Corp., a Delaware corporation (the “Buyer”) and [insert name of Rollover Seller] (“the Rollover Seller”). Capitalized terms not defined herein have the meanings set forth in the Agreement. 
 R E C I T A L S 
 WHEREAS, the parties hereto wish to amend Section 4(b)(v) of the Agreement to ensure it accurately states the equity of the Buyer that would be outstanding as of the Closing; 
 NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows: 
 Section 4(b)(v) of the Agreement is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following: 
 “Securities Issued to Trimaran. As
of the Closing, 1,918,163.25 shares of Buyer Common Stock will be issued and outstanding (after giving effect to the transactions contemplated by the Purchase Agreement and the exchange agreements entered into by the Rollover Sellers (as defined in
the Purchase Agreement)). In addition to the Buyer Common Stock, 306,529 shares of Common Stock are reserved for issuance in connection with the potential exercise of stock options. The Common Stock and options to acquire up to 306,529 shares of
Common Stock are the only equity securities of Buyer outstanding as of the Closing.” 







 Except as expressly amended above, the Agreement shall remain in force. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have duly executed this Amendment No. 1 to Exchange Agreement as of the date first written above. 

 

			
	ROLLOVER SELLER:
		
	 By:
	 	  
		 	 Name:

	
	BUYER:
	
	 CHICKEN ACQUISITION CORP.

		
	 By:
	 	  
		 	 Steven A. Flyer

		 	 President
```

[Federal Register: April 26, 2011 (Volume 76, Number 80)]
[Notices]               
[Page 23272]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr26ap11-30]                         

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT

 
Notice of Meeting

    Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act, notice is hereby 
given of a meeting of the Advisory Committee on Voluntary Foreign Aid 
(ACVFA).
    Date: Friday, May 13, 2011.
    Time: 9 to 11 a.m.
    Location: National Press Club, 529 14th Street, NW., Washington, DC 
20045.

Agenda

    USAID Administrator Rajiv Shah will give remarks, followed by a 
panel discussion. Additional information will be available on the ACVFA 
Web site at http://www.usaid.gov/about_usaid/acvfa. The tentative 
agenda is subject to change.

Stakeholders

    The meeting is free and open to the public. Persons wishing to 
attend can register online at http://www.usaid.gov/about_usaid/acvfa/acvfaregistration.html. For additional information, please contact 
Nicole Mlade at (202) 712-5512 or nmlade@usaid.gov.

    Dated: April 18, 2011.
Christine Brown,
Office of the Executive Secretariat.
[FR Doc. 2011-9998 Filed 4-25-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
```
BEFORE THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION WASHINGTON, D.C.

_________________________________________ ) Application of ) ) TRANSCARGA INT'L AIRWAYS, C.A. ) DOCKET OST-2001-11231 ) for amendment/renewal of an exemption ) (Venezuela-U.S. charter, all-cargo service) ) _________________________________________ )

MOTION OF TRANSCARGA INT'L AIRWAYS, C.A. FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT

Communications with respect to this document should be sent to:

John R. Mietus, Jr. Law Office of John Mietus, LLC 6701 Democracy Blvd., Suite 300 Bethesda, MD 20817-7500 (202) 747-5212 - Telephone (240) 396-5362 - Fax john@mietuslaw.com

Counsel for TRANSCARGA INT'L AIRWAYS, C.A.

April 27, 2012BEFORE THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION WASHINGTON, D.C.

_________________________________________ ) Application of ) ) TRANSCARGA INT'L AIRWAYS, C.A. ) DOCKET OST-2001-11231 ) April 27, 2012 for amendment/renewal of an exemption ) (Venezuela-U.S. charter, all-cargo service) ) _________________________________________ )

MOTION OF TRANSCARGA INT'L AIRWAYS, C.A. FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT

Pursuant to Rule 12 of the Department's Rules of Practice, 14 C.F.R. § 302.12, Transcarga Int'l Airways, C.A. respectfully moves to withhold from public disclosure the contents of Confid ential Exhibits A (6 pages) and B (4 pages). In accordance with Rule 12, the exhibits have been marked "Confidential" and are being filed under seal. Confidential Exhibits A and B contain financial and operational information relating to Transcarga and projections relating to the service it now proposes to operate with its own aircraft. The exhibits incorporate private, financial and commercial inform ation of a type that is not usually disclosed to the public, and they are being provided to the Department solely in support of the application for exemption amendment/renewal filed simultaneously with this Motion. Disclo sure of this information would cause material harm to Transcarga's competitive position.