alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: Barnett.Keith@epamail.epa.gov

Sent: Monday, October 26, 2009 8:57 AM

To: Torres.Elineth@epamail.epa.gov; Laney, Michael N.

Subject: Fw: world's leading cement engineering company starts SCR flue gas cleaning division for

cement kilns

Attachments: Polysius AG and Elex AG have established Elex CemCat AG as a joint venture.pdf

Keith W. Barnett

USEPA/OAQPS/SPPD/MMG

Mail Code D243

‐ 02

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

919

‐ 541

‐ 5605

barnett.keith@epa.gov

‐‐‐‐‐ Forwarded by Keith Barnett/RTP/USEPA/US on 10/26/2009 08:57 AM

From: "Armendariz, Al" <aja@lyle.smu.edu>

| To: Keith Barnett/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

| Cc: “Linero, Alvaro" <Alvaro.Linero@dep.state.fl.us>, <schermbeck@aol.com>

| Date: 10/25/2009 07:32 PM

| Subject: world's leading cement engineering company starts SCR flue gas cleaning

division for cement kilns |

<<Polysius AG and Elex AG have established Elex CemCat AG as a joint venture.pdf>>

Polysius + ThyssenKrupp + ELEX = cement SCR

“The increasing demands imposed on the cleaning of flue gas in the cement industry have to be met

with new solutions. Polysius AG and Elex AG have therefore founded a joint venture for catalytic flue gas

cleaning (SCR).”

http://www.polysius.com/News

‐ Item.139.0.html?&L=1&cH ash=feff3eaccb&tx_ttnews

[backPid]=1&tx_ttnews[tt_news]=275

Picture (Device Independent Bitmap)

Polysius AG and Elex AG have established Elex CemCat AG as a joint venture

...

October 16, 2009

... for advancing the catalytic flue gas cleaning technology in nonmetallic

mineral processing plants Polysius strengthens its systems business on the cement plant engineering

sector by adding environmental technologyThe increasing demands imposed on the cleaning of flue gas in the cement industry have to be met with

new solutions. Polysius AG and Elex AG have therefore founded a joint venture for catalytic flue gas

cleaning (SCR).

Elex AG is a leading company on the flue gas cleaning sector and has been instrumental in developing

catalytic flue gas cleaning technology for the cement industry.

The joint venture will extend the technological knowhow of the cement manufacturing process and the

worldwide plant engineering activities of Polysius AG by adding attractive and future

‐ oriented

environmental technology.

CemCat will serve as the competence centre for catalytic flue gas cleaning within the Polysius Group.

The registered office of the new company is Schwerzenbach (near Zurich) in Switzerland.

(See attached file: Polysius AG and Elex AG have established Elex CemCat AG as a joint venture.pdf)

## Copyrighted page/s removed. Copyrighted ma terial is not available in

Regulations.gov since it may not be reproduced without consent of

the copyright holder.

Contact the EPA Docket Center’s P ublic Reading Room to view

or receive a copy of this document.

Requests for copies may be made as follows:

In person/writing:

Environmental Protection Agency, Docket Center

1301 Constitution Ave NW, 2822T, Room 3334

Washington, DC. 20004

Telephone:

202-566-1744

Fax:

202-566- 9744

Email:

docket-customerservice@epa.gov
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v William Howard, Appellant.

Judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County, rendered January 26, 1976, convicting defendant of manslaughter in first degree and possession of a weapon as a felony and sentencing him to concurrent indeterminate terms of seven years on each count, unanimously reversed, on the law, and a new trial ordered. Defendant claimed he was denied a fair trial. We agree with defendant’s contention, as the verdict herein was not returned by a fair and impartial jury *(People v McLaughlin,*150 NY 365, 375; *People v Crimmins,*36 NY2d 230; CPL 470.15). Defendant was a "policy worker” charged with the slaying of one of his customers, whom he shot in the course of an argument about payment of the customer’s winnings. It was established at a posttrial hearing that the juror who occupied Seat No. 2, the 12th and last juror sworn, had been a registered police informant working with the District Attorney’s office in the investiga*671tion of gambling, that the juror had been a gambler unable to pay his debts and had become an informant because he needed police protection from the bookmakers to whom he owed money. This information first came to the attention of the prosecutor after the verdict was rendered. There is no indication that the prosecutor was aware of the juror’s status before then (cf. *People v Phillips,*87 Misc 2d 613, affd 52 AD2d 758, mot for lv to app den 39 NY2d 949). When the prospective juror was asked on *voir dire*whether he had ever been "connected with any law enforcement agency”, he failed to disclose that status. Further, when asked whether there was any reason he could not be fair and impartial, the then prospective juror answered in the negative. He was not asked any questions about gambling or police, nor did he volunteer any information about his gambling debts or his fear for safety. Had the prospective juror disclosed on the *voir dire*the facts that were established at the posttrial hearing, a challenge for cause would have been sustained *(People v Pauley,*281 App Div 223, and cases cited therein; cf. *People v Winship,*2 NY2d 944; CPL 270.20, subd 1, pars [b], [c]). Furthermore, while the record does not establish whether defendant had exhausted his peremptory challenges (CPL 270.25, subd 2) at the time the 12th juror was selected, it is conceivable that had the critical information been disclosed, defendant might have allocated his peremptory challenges so as to have reserved one for this juror (see *People v Culhane,*33 NY2d 90). CPL 40.30 (subd 3) provides that in such instance as before this court, a retrial may be ordered. Moreover, the United States Supreme Court has held that where a conviction is reversed on procedural rather than substantive or factual grounds, the constitutional bar against double jeopardy is inapplicable *(Burks v United States,*437 US 1). In view of this disposition, defendant’s other contentions need not be considered. Concur— Birns, J. P., Lane, Yesawich and Sandler, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 673 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 673

  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to decrease the distance 
  away from home required for a member of a reserve component of the 
Armed Forces to be eligible for the above-the-line deduction for travel 
                               expenses.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 21, 2017

Ms. Klobuchar (for herself, Mr. Tillis, Mr. Van Hollen, Mr. Markey, Mr. 
Kaine, Mrs. Gillibrand, and Ms. Warren) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to decrease the distance 
  away from home required for a member of a reserve component of the 
Armed Forces to be eligible for the above-the-line deduction for travel 
                               expenses.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Savings for Servicemembers Act''.

SEC. 2. DECREASE IN REQUIRED DISTANCE AWAY FROM HOME FOR ABOVE-THE-LINE 
              DEDUCTION FOR TRAVEL EXPENSES OF MEMBERS OF A RESERVE 
              COMPONENT OF THE ARMED FORCES.

    (a) In General.--Section 62(a)(2)(E) of the Internal Revenue Code 
of 1986 is amended by striking ``100 miles'' and inserting ``50 
miles''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2016.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 10.38

                      SALES CONTRACT OF INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS
                      -------------------------------------
                                                                 NO.:
                                                               SIGNED AT: Tai'an
                                                           DATE: August 10, 2005


This  contract  is  made  and  entered  into  by  and  between   Shandong  Haize
Nanomaterials Co., Ltd (hereinafter referred to as the Seller) and Triangle Tire
Co.,  Ltd  (hereinafter  referred to as the Buyer);  whereby the Seller agree to
sell and the Buyer agree to buy the commodity mentioned in this contract subject
to the terms and conditions stipulated below:

Article 1: Object, Quantity, Price and Date of Delivery

NAME OF COMMODITY: Nanometre Calcium Carbonate

Trademark: Sheng Ke

Specification: 602

Manufacturer: Shandong Haize Nanomaterials

UNIT: ton

QUANTITY: 3,600

UNIT PRICE: RMB 3,960.00 yuan

TOTAL AMOUNT:  RMB 14,256,000.00  (fourteen  million,  two hundred and fifty-six
thousand) yuan

DATE OF DELIVERY: From August 2005 to August 2006, 300 tons each month

Article 2: QUALITY STANDARD

Be subject to the Q/VLT 2000 Enterprise Standard.

Article 3: PACKING  STANDARD AND THE PROVISION  AND RECOVERY OF PACKINGS:  Outer
packed with paper bag and inner packed with plastic bag.



<PAGE>

Article  4:  STANDARD  FOR  REASONABLE  WEAR AND TEAR AND  COMPUTING  MODE:  The
quantity  shall be based on the quantity  accepted and put in the storage by the
Buyer.

Article 5: MEANS AND PLACE OF DELIVERY:  The warehouse of the buyer.

Article 6: MODE OF TRANSPORAT AND DESTINATION AND COST ALLOCATION:  By road; the
Seller shall pay the cost.

Article  7:  STANDARD,  METHOD,  and PLACE  AND TIME  LIMIT OF  INSPECTION:  The
inspection will be done in accordance with agreed standards, and if there is any
objection, it will be made clear to the other party within 15 days.

Article 8: METHOD, TIME AND PLACE OF PAYMENT: By bank draft.

Article 9: BREACH LIABILITY: shall be governed by the provisions of the Contract
Law.

Article 10: METHOD OF SETTLING THE DISPUTE OVER THE CONTRACT:

IN THE PERFORMING OF THIS CONTRACT, IF ANY DISPUTE ARISES, THE TWO PARTIES SHALL
SETTLE IT THROUGH FRIENDLY DISCUSSIONS;  THE DISPUTE CAN ALSO BE MEDIATED BY THE
LOCAL INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERICAL ADMINISTRATION;  IF NO SETTLEMENT COMES FROM THE
DISCUSSIONS OR  MEDIATATIONS,  THE DISPUTE SHALL BE SETTLED BY LAWSUITS  THROUGH
THE PEOPLE'S COURT.

Article 11: THIS CONTRACT SHALL BECOME  EFFECTIVE  after having been  officially
signed by the two parities.

Article 12:  MISCELLANEOUS:  The contract period is one full year, starting from
August 10, 2005 and ending on August 10, 2006.

THE SELLER:                                            THE BUYER:
Shandong Haize Nanomaterials Co.,                      Triangle Tire Co., Ltd
Ltd

 /s/ Ma Zhaowei                                         /s/ Yu Zhongming
---------------------------------                      -------------------------
AUTHORISED SIGNATURE                                   AUTHORISED SIGNATURE
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Patrick Orville Setford, Appellant.

— Appeal from a judgment of the Madison County Court, rendered June 21, 1978, upon a verdict convicting defendant of the crimes of sodomy in the second degree and sodomy in the third degree. Initially, defendant contends that the trial court erred in admitting proof of uncharged acts of sodomy, involving defendant and complainants, which occurred prior to and subsequent to the single incident upon which the two counts of the indictment were based. In our view, this evidence of *1061"the ongoing relationship and conduct between and among the parties involved, is relevant and permissible where the acts charged occur within the home and are open to question concerning defendant’s disposition” *(People v Yonko,*34 NY2d 825, 827; see, also, *People v Thompson,*212 NY 249). Contrary to the suggestion in defendant’s brief, there is no evidence that defendant’s incestuous relationship with his daughters was anything other than ongoing and concensual, nor do the crimes with which defendant was charged require forcible compulsion. Accordingly, the cases cited by defendant are distinguishable. Next, defendant challenges the sufficiency of the factual allegations in the indictment. As noted by defendant, the indictment tracks the language of the statute in charging defendant with the crimes of sodomy in the third degree and sodomy in the second degree (Penal Law, §§ 130.40, 130.45) without describing the exact nature of the deviate sexual intercourse with which he was being charged. As in *People v Jackson*(46 NY2d 721, revg 60 AD2d 893), the indictment, although inartfully drawn, does contain all the elements of the crimes and, therefore, is not defective. Moreover, there was no motion to dismiss the indictment until defendant appeared for sentencing, and defendant does not contend that he was in fact unaware of the charges against him or that he was actually prejudiced by the alleged insufficiency. Accordingly, in light of *People v Iannone*(45 NY2d 589), defendant’s challenge must be rejected as untimely. Finally, we also reject defendant’s contention that the prosecutor’s cross-examination of defendant and his character witnesses, together with certain comments made by the prosecutor during his summation, deprived defendant of a fair trial. In our view the cross-examination was a proper method of attacking the credibility of defendant and his character witnesses (see *People v Alamo,*23 NY2d 630, cert den 396 US 879), and the summation, taken as a whole, did not deprive defendant of a fair trial (see *People v Hochberg,*62 AD2d 239, 249-250). Judgment affirmed. Mahoney, P. J., Greenblott, Main, Mikoll and Herlihy, JJ., concur.
Certification for Contracts, Grants, Loans, and Cooperative Agreements

(2) If any funds other than Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for 

influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an 

officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with this Federal 

contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement, the undersigned shall complete and submit Standard 

Form-LLL, ''Disclosure of Lobbying Activities,'' in accordance with its instructions.

(3) The undersigned shall require that the language of this certification be included in the award documents 

for all subawards at all tiers (including subcontracts, subgrants, and contracts under grants, loans, and 

cooperative agreements) and that all subrecipients shall certify and disclose accordingly. This certification 

is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was made or 

entered into. Submission of this certification is a prerequisite for making or entering into this transaction 

imposed by section 1352, title 31, U.S. Code. Any person who fails to file the required certification shall be

subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,00 0 and not more than $100,000 for each such failure. 

If any funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer

or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of

a Member of Congress in connection with this commitment providing for the United States to insure or 

guarantee a loan, the undersigned shall complete and submit Standard Form-LLL, ''Disclosure of Lobbying 

Activities,'' in accordance with its instructions. Submission of this statement is a prerequisite for making or 

entering into this transaction imposed by section 1352, title 31, U.S. Code. Any person who fails to file the

required statement shall be subjec t to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000

for each such failure.

* APPLICANT'S ORGANIZATION

* SIGNATURE: * DATE:

* PRINTED NAME AND TITLE OF AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE

Suffix:

Middle Name:

* Title:

* First Name:

* Last Name:

Prefix:

CERTIFICATION REGARDING LOBBYING

(1) No Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of the undersigned, to any

person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of an agency, a Member of 

Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with 

the awarding of any Federal contract, the making of any Federal grant, the making of any Federal loan, the

entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or 

modification of any Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement.

The undersigned certifies, to the best of his or her knowledge and belief, that:

Statement for Loan Guarantees and Loan Insurance 

The undersigned states, to the best of his or her knowledge and belief, that:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Donald C. Wood, the President and Chief Executive Officer of Federal Realty Investment Trust (the Company), has executed this certification in connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange
Commission of the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2007 (the Report). The undersigned hereby certifies that:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|               |  |  |  |                                               
|-------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------
|               |  | 
|August 1, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/ DONALD C. WOOD                            
|               |  |  |  | Donald C. Wood,                               
|               |  |  |  | President, Chief Executive Officer and Trustee
|               |  |  |  | (Principal Executive Officer)
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

|  |
|--|
|  |
|  | HomeNewsPrograms/InitiativesLaws, Regs & GuidanceOffice ContactsFAQsReports & ResourcesHome PageResourcesEducational and Employment Barriers for Adult & Adolescent ELsEL Family ToolkitEDTech for English LearnersStudy on ELs for Gifted & Talented ProgramsTips for Identifying Gifted EL StudentsNAM Cohorts StudyWebinars (PDF, 75KB)Dear Colleague Letter 2015Newcomer Tool Kit (PDF, 5.3 MB)English Learner Tool Kit (PDF, 8 MB)More ResourcesNCELA Fact SheetsRAISE THE BAR: Provide Every Student with a Pathway to Multilingualism InfographicWELCOME
The U.S. Department of Education's Office of English Language Acquisition (OELA) provides national leadership to help ensure that English Learners and immigrant students attain English proficiency and achieve academic success. In addition to preserving heritage languages and cultures, OELA is committed to prompting opportunities for biliteracy or multiliteracy skills for all students. OELA accomplishes this in the following ways:
- Providing national leadership by informing policy decisions
- Administering discretionary grant programs to prepare professionals for teaching and supporting English Learners
- Investing in research and evaluation studies that have practical applications for preparing English Learners to meet college and career learning standards
- Disseminating information about educational research, practices, and policies for English Learners through our  National Clearinghouse for English Language Acquisition (NCELA)
   Printable view  Last Modified: 07/26/2023 |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE EMONS
TRANSPORTATION GROUP, INC. CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE SIX MONTHS
ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000032666
<NAME> Emons Transportation Group, Inc.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                       1,988,616
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,603,341
<ALLOWANCES>                                   194,228
<INVENTORY>                                    351,740
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,999,525
<PP&E>                                      40,960,217
<DEPRECIATION>                              13,276,813
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              35,599,183
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,364,226
<BONDS>                                     14,167,470
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        78,563
<OTHER-SE>                                  15,151,540
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                35,599,183
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            12,576,346
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                8,411,575
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             577,571
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,721,544
<INCOME-TAX>                                   762,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            959,544
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   959,544
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.12


</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.1
CEO CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Larry Edwards, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify that:



|(1) | I have reviewed this periodic report on Form 10-Q of Reliability Incorporated;                                                                               
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | This quarterly report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                             
|(3) | The information contained in this quarterly report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company
|    |                                                                                                                                                              

/s/ Larry Edwards
Larry Edwards
Chief Executive Officer
May 12, 2003

22