alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF FAIR GROUNDS CORPORATION FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED
JANUARY 31, 1998, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1998
<CASH>                                           6,849
<SECURITIES>                                        95
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,369
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        200
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                12,787
<PP&E>                                          49,736
<DEPRECIATION>                                  14,568
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  51,364
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,376
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,525
<OTHER-SE>                                      26,979
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    51,364
<SALES>                                          7,022
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                10,542
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    8,710
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,174
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   3
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    712
<INCOME-TAX>                                       263
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                448
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  4,851
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,299
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    11.31
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    11.31
        

</TABLE>
### §471. Statistics and estimates of grades and staple length of cotton; collection and publication

The Secretary of Agriculture is authorized and directed to collect and publish annually, on dates to be announced by him, statistics or estimates concerning the grades and staple length of stocks of cotton, known as the carry-over, on hand on the 1st of August of each year in warehouses and other establishments of every character in the continental United States; and following such publication each year, to publish, at intervals in his discretion, his estimate of the grades and staple length of cotton of the then current crop: Provided, That not less than three such estimates shall be published with respect to each crop. In any such statistics or estimates published, the cotton which on the date for which such statistics are published may be recognized as tenderable on contracts of sale of cotton for future delivery under the United States Cotton Futures Act, shall be stated separately from that which may be untenderable under said Act.

(Mar. 3, 1927, ch. 337, §1, 44 Stat. 1372.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The United States Cotton Futures Act, referred to in text, is part A of act Aug. 11, 1916, ch. 313, 39 Stat. 476, which was repealed by section 4 of act Feb. 10, 1939, ch. 2, 53 Stat. 1. For complete classification of this Act to the Code prior to its repeal, see Tables.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Short Title of 1987 Amendment

Pub. L. 100–108, §1, Aug. 20, 1987, 101 Stat. 728, provided: "That this Act [amending section 473a of this title and enacting provisions set out as notes under section 473a of this title] may be cited as the 'Uniform Cotton Classing Fees Act of 1987'."

#### Short Title

Act Mar. 3, 1927, which enacted sections 471 to 474 and amended sections 475 and 476 of this title, is popularly known as the "Cotton Statistics and Estimates Act".
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         130,834
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           5,243
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                46,020
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    250,578
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         347,713
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           349,114
<LOANS>                                      1,498,262
<ALLOWANCE>                                     18,006
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,376,327
<DEPOSITS>                                   2,025,487
<SHORT-TERM>                                    81,262
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             19,176
<LONG-TERM>                                     15,359
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        40,361
<OTHER-SE>                                     194,682
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               2,376,327
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 67,644
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               18,372
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 1,850
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                87,866
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              34,628
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,783
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           51,455
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    1,912
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 428
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 36,818
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 23,381
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      23,381
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    15,389
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.76
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.76
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.88
<LOANS-NON>                                      8,109
<LOANS-PAST>                                    10,230
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                    81
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                 16,053
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                17,936
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    2,633
<RECOVERIES>                                       791
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               18,006
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            18,006
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit32.2**

Certification Pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I,Raymond F. Lancy, Chief Financial Officer of Bridgford Foods Corporation (the “Company”),certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, that:

(1)           theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period endedApril 20, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or780(d)); and

(2)           theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| Dated: June 4, 2007 |   | /s/                               |   | Raymond F. Lancy |
|---------------------|--------|-----------------------------------|--------|------------------|
|                |   | Raymond F. Lancy, Chief Financial |
|                |   | Officer                           |
|                |   | (Principal Financial Officer)     |

 

----
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Paul Boland, Appellant.

Motion granted to appeal on original papers, typewritten briefs, and Franklin J. Schwarzer, Esq., of Syracuse, assigned as counsel.
Exhibit
23(b)











Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm








We
consent to the incorporation by reference in PPL Energy Supply, LLC's
Registration Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-128219, 333-116477, 333-106200,
333-106200-01, 333-132574, 333-132574-01, 333-132574-02, and 333-132574-03) of
our report dated February 27, 2009, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements and schedule of PPL Energy Supply, LLC, included in this Annual
Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2008.





/s/ Ernst
& Young LLP


Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania


February
27, 2009
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              NOV-29-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   AUG-30-1997
<CASH>                                               9,093 
<SECURITIES>                                        60,182 
<RECEIVABLES>                                       28,004 
<ALLOWANCES>                                           800 
<INVENTORY>                                         29,421 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   127,610 
<PP&E>                                             112,454 
<DEPRECIATION>                                      81,983 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     161,676 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               17,562 
<BONDS>                                                572 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0 
<PREFERRED>                                              0 
<COMMON>                                             1,314
<OTHER-SE>                                         134,661 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       161,676 
<SALES>                                            120,190 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   120,190 
<CGS>                                              103,037 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      103,037 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    11,180 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       300 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      49 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      9,828 
<INCOME-TAX>                                         3,143 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  6,685 
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0 
<CHANGES>                                                0 
<NET-INCOME>                                         6,685 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         1.17 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         1.17 
                                                 


</TABLE>
1603.7001 Policy. ( a ) OPM prepares and distributes or makes available to Federal employees and annuitants a comparison booklet which presents summary information and a benefits brochure which details benefits, limitations, and premium rates for all participating plans. OPM does not encourage, support, or reimburse participating carriers for the costs of advertisements. However, while OPM believes that advertising is unnecessary, it recognizes that the decision to use advertising rests with each carrier.
( b ) OPM discourages advertising that is misleading or deceptive. This includes advertising that is directed at other carriers' plans participating in the Program and which uses incomplete or inappropriate comparisons or disparaging or minimizing techniques. Such unfair practices are prejudicial to the interests of the vast majority of carriers whose advertising is fair and accurate.
( c ) Failure to conform to the requirements of this subpart shall be a material breach of the contract and may result in withdrawal of approval to continue participation in the FEHB Program.
[52 FR 16039, May 1, 1987. Redesignated at 62 FR 47574, Sept. 10, 1997]
##### 



Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Current Report on Form 10-Q of Claires Stores, Inc. (the Company)
for the quarterly period ended October 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Bonnie Schaefer, Acting Co-Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| |                            |  |  | 
| | -------------------------- |  |  | 
| |                            | 
| | /s/ E. Bonnie Schaefer     | 
| | E. Bonnie Schaefer         | 
| | Co-Chief Executive Officer | 
|

December 9, 2004
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000013777
<NAME> BRADLEY REAL ESTATE, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                             108
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   22,307
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,884
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                33,626
<PP&E>                                       1,000,826
<DEPRECIATION>                                  69,713
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 964,739
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           28,068
<BONDS>                                        422,473
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     86,809
<COMMON>                                       350,653
<OTHER-SE>                                      76,736
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   964,739
<SALES>                                         36,872
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                37,558
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   10,961
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,350
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,182
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,831
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,831
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.33
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.33


</TABLE>
### §440. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 440 was editorially reclassified as section 1436 of this title.
#### Charles Gallina, Respondent, v Linda F. Fedrizzi et al., Appellants, et al., Defendant.

[831 NYS2d 731]

In an action to recover damages for legal malpractice, the defendant Kerry John Katsorhis appeals, as limited by his notice of appeal and brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (O’Donoghue, J.), dated November 21, 2005, as denied those branches of his motion which were pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (5) and (7) to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against him in his individual capacity, and the defendant Linda F. Fedrizzi separately appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of the same order as denied her motion pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (5), (7), and (8) to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against her in her individual capacity.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs to the respondent payable by the appellants appearing separately and filing separate briefs.

The Supreme Court properly denied those branches of the respective motions of the defendants Kerry John Katsorhis and Linda F. Fedrizzi which were pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7) to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against them in their individual capacities. Giving the allegations of the complaint the *468benefit of every favorable inference *(see Leon v Martinez,*84 NY2d 83, 87 [1994]; CPLR 3211 [a] [7]), we conclude that the complaint states a cause of action for legal malpractice against these defendants, individually *(see Arnav Indus., Inc. Retirement Trust v Brown, Raysman, Millstein, Felder & Steiner,*96 NY2d 300, 303, 304 [2001]; Business Corporation Law § 1505 [a]). Contrary to their further contentions, Katsorhis and Fedrizzi failed to show that the time in which to sue had expired *(see*CPLR 214 [6]; *Shumsky v Eisenstein,*96 NY2d 164 [2001]; *Pollicino v Roemer & Featherstonhaugh,*260 AD2d 52, 53 [1999]; *cf. Gravel v Cicola,*297 AD2d 620 [2002]; *Piliero v Adler & Stavros,*282 AD2d 511 [2001]).

Fedrizzi’s remaining contention is without merit. Rivera, J.P., Ritter, Goldstein and Angiolillo, JJ., concur.
# A

Adult_Education_State_Grants

Block Grant for Improving School Programs

Consumer_and_Homemaking_Education

ESEA_Title_I__Grants_to_Local_Educational_Agencies

Federal_Pell_Grants

Federal_Perkins_Loans__Capital_Contributions

Federal_Supplemental_Educational_Opportunity_Grants

Federal_Work_Study

Grand_Total

Immigrant_Education

Impact_Aid__Basic_Support_Payments

Indian_Education__Grants_to_Local_Educational_Agencies

Leveraging_Educational_Assistance_Partnership

Special_Education__Grants_to_States

Special_Education__Preschool_Grants

Vocational_Education_State_Councils

Vocational_Education_State_Grants

Vocational_Rehabilitation_State_Grants
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Marie G. Berry, Respondent, v. B. Gertz, Inc., et al., Appellants. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.

Appeal by the employer and its carrier from a decision and award of the Workmen’s Compensation Board which unanimously affirmed a Referee’s decision that claimant sustained an accident arising out of and in the course of employment. Claimant worked as a sales clerk in the employer’s department store located in a shopping center in Hicksville, N. Y. The employer’s store is one of many retail outlets in the shopping plaza. The stores are all grouped in the center of a mall which is completely surrounded by parking fields estimated to accommodate 8,000 ears. The parking area is operated by the owners of the entire shopping center and the employer appellant has no ownership or control over this area whatever. The parking area is for the use of the employees as well as the customers of the various stores. There is no charge to park and employees of the employer appellant were allowed to park their ears anywhere in the parking area. On December 20, 1962, the claimant went to work around noon and stopped work at approximately 6 o’clock for supper. As was her custom when working in the evening, claimant drove home for her supper hour. She returned around 7 o’clock and parked her car in the parking field. When she was alighting from ner car, claimant fell and fractured her wrist. The board in affirming the award *709stated: *“*The parking facilities are open to use by the buying public and persons employed at the shopping center, and while it may be said that the parking facilities are primarily for the convenience of the shoppers, they are likewise a convenience to the employers and employees doing business at the shopping center. Its use by such employees furthered the interests of their respective employers and the accident having occurred within the parking area, it is the opinion of the Board that the occurrence was a reasonable incident of the employment, and arose out of and in the course thereof.” Appellant raises the issue that since the parking area was not owned, controlled or maintained by the employer, the accident did not arise out of claimant’s employment. This argument was rejected in *Matter of Rosenwasser*v. *Lanes Lake Success*(9 A D 2d 1001) where claimant fell in a shopping center parking lot while walking toward her employer’s store, as her employment required, and we held that under the circumstances the parking lot was part of the employer’s precincts although not under the employer’s jurisdiction. (See, also, *Chadwick*v. *Clark,*19 A D 2d 679.) The question of whether or not the accident happened as an incident and risk of employment was within the realm of the fact-finders. *(Matter of Rosenwasser*v. *Lanes Lake Success, supra; Matter of Brienza*v. *Le Chase Constr. Corp.,*17 A D 2d 83.) We believe that under the circumstances of this case the finding that the accident arose out of and in the course of employment is substantiated by the record. Decision affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Gibson, P. J., Reynolds, Taylor, Aulisi and Hamm, JJ., concur.
""'"··.r- '='"·,

# ::~**~j ~-,**  ..........:

# -

iZ\_

Harbor ofRefuge- Dedieated August 6, 1961 11 July2012
Mr. Dennis DeVany Chief, Essential Air Service Division Office ofAviation Analysis Department ofTransportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue Se., Washington, D. C. 20590 

## };J JZ 

# City of Harrisville Office ofthe Mayor P.O. 

## Box 278
. Harrisville, 

## MI 48740 (989) 724-6666

Reference; DOT-OST-2009-0300, Alpena, Michigan Air Service Dear Mr. DeVany, 

# !2

The City ofHarrisville, Michigan, thru its City Council action on 4 July 2012, wishes to lend its support to the proposal ofSky West Airlines to provide essential air service at Alpena, Michigan as replacement fbr our current air service. Locai air service thatprovides an effective connection to the national and international air transportation system is critical to the economic well being ofAlpena and to the residents o f HalTisville, Michigan. Werely on this local air service for both business and leisure travel. The SykWestproposal offers us a 50-seat regionaljet with the Deltabrand and code and service to the Delta hubs ofDetroit and Minneapolis. We believe the SykWest air service proposal represents the best optionfor retaining our local air service long tenn and building up traffic so that government subsidies can eventually be reduced or eliminated. We urge the Department ofTransportation to award SkyWest Airways the designation to provide Alpena's Essential Air Service. Bestregards,