alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# State-by-State

Undistributed (Non-State Allocations)

Indian Set-Aside

Freely Associated States

Virgin Islands

Puerto Rico

Northern Mariana Islands

Guam

American Samoa

Wyoming

Wisconsin

West Virginia

Washington

Virginia

Vermont

Texas

Tennessee

South Dakota

South Carolina

Rhode Island

Pennsylvania

Oregon

Oklahoma

Ohio

North Dakota

North Carolina

New York

New Mexico

New Jersey

New Hampshire

Nevada

Nebraska

Montana

Missouri

Mississippi

Minnesota

Michigan

Massachusetts

Maryland

Maine

Louisiana

Kentucky

Kansas

Iowa

Indiana

Illinois

Idaho

Hawaii

Georgia

Florida

District of Columbia

Delaware

Connecticut

Colorado

California

Arkansas

Arizona

Alaska

Alabama

Utah

GRAND TOTAL

# Sheet1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Mariseli Gomez

v.

PNC Bank

Case No: 12 C 1274

Judge: Thomas M. Durkin

ORDER

Enter Order on Class Counsel's petition for reimbursement of attorney's fees and

litigation expenses from the settlement frrnd. Enter Order Granting Final Approval fo Class and

Collective Action Settlement. For settlement purposes the settlement class is certified pursuant

to Fed. R. Civ. P . 23 . The Court hereby enters Judgment approving the terms of the Settlement.

Date: 712212016 /s/ Thomas M. Durkin

Case: 1:12-cv-01274 Document #: 137 Filed: 07/22/16 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:1765
### SUBCHAPTER VII—FEDERAL RETIREMENT THRIFT INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
### §§83 to 86. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Sections 83 to 86 transferred to sections 1509 to 1512, respectively, of Title 48, Territories and Insular Possessions.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Anibal Calo, Appellant.

Motion by defendant, whose appeal from a judgment of conviction rendered after a jury trial is now pending in this court: (a) to remand the action to the County Court, Suffolk County, for a trial as to the voluntariness of two written statements or confessions (People’s Exhibits 9, 11) allegedly given by defendant; and (b) to enlarge defendant’s time to perfect his appeal. This motion is made necessary because of the recent decision of the Supreme Court of the United States *(Jackson*v. *Denno,*378 U. S. 368). It appears that the issue as to the voluntariness of defendant’s confession was raised at the trial and submitted to the jury. Accordingly, the motion is granted and the action is remitted to the County Court, Suffolk County, for further proceedings not inconsistent herewith. A separate trial should be accorded promptly to the defendant upon the issue of the voluntariness of his confession. Such trial should be held *de novo*before the court alone, without a jury. At the conclusion of the trial, the Justice presiding shall render promptly his decision setting forth specifically his findings upon the issue. The decision should be based exclusively on the evidence adduced upon such trial. The trial should also be conducted in accordance with such further or different procedures and requirements as may be prescribed by the Court of Appeals of this State in any decision rendered by it prior to the trial court’s decision upon the issue of voluntariness. Within 20 days after the trial court’s decision upon the issue of voluntariness, a supplemental record, consisting of the typewritten or printed transcript of the stenographic minutes of the separate trial and of the court’s decision and findings, should be filed and served by the District Attorney. Within 30 days thereafter, the defendant shall serve and file his typewritten or printed brief or supplemental brief; and within 20 days thereafter the District Attorney shall serve and file his brief or supplemental brief. [If defendant’s brief or supplemental brief be typewritten, six copies are required to be filed and one copy served.] The appeal is directed to be placed on the calendar for the April Term, commencing *926March 29, 1965. Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Brennan, JJ., concur.
##### 



Exhibit 31.3
 
      a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andd)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 September 7, 2005
    
    
    
    /s/ Ira D. KaplanIra D. KaplanChief Financial Officer
#### 1401.7001-2 Legal review by the Office of the Solicitor.

The Office of the Solicitor (SOL) will review for legal sufficiency selected types and portions of contract actions from Bureaus and offices as required by the FAR, DIAR, and Department-wide policy. COs may request SOL advice or guidance on acquisition-related matters at any time. Matters related to legal sufficiency reviews that cannot be resolved between the respective CO and SOL Attorney-Advisor must be submitted for resolution to the HCA and the Assistant Solicitor for Acquisitions and Intellectual Property, Washington, DC.
Case: 1:12-cv-01190 Document #: 23 Filed: 08/29/12 Page 1 of 4 PageID #:116
Case: 1:12-cv-01190 Document #: 23 Filed: 08/29/12 Page 2 of 4 PageID #:117
Case: 1:12-cv-01190 Document #: 23 Filed: 08/29/12 Page 3 of 4 PageID #:118
Case: 1:12-cv-01190 Document #: 23 Filed: 08/29/12 Page 4 of 4 PageID #:119
Unassociated Document


    Pak
      Telecom

    


    Lakhkar
      Khan

    G.M.
      (Tele-Housing & VoIP) 

    


    Pakistan
      Telecommunications Company Limited

    Rizwan
      Centre, G/Floor, Blue Area, Islamabad

    Ph#
      92-51
      2272021 Fax # 92-52-2201015

    


    No.
      VoIP/Tech/G-4/Fusion/2005

    


    SUBJECT:
      TERMINATION
      OF THE VoIP AGREEMENT

    


    Thank
      you
      for your letter dated November 15, 2005 requesting for formal termination of
      the
      VoIP Agreement concluded between PTCL & M/s Fusion Telecom.

    


    The
      PTCL
      International Wing has been requested to settle all out standing Payments/
      Accounts with M/s Fusion Telecom & formally close the Agreement. Termination
      of the VoIP Agreement will be confirmed as soon as clearance is received from
      concerned PTCL wings.

    


    The
      CDRs
      issue raised by M/s Fusion Telecom is in process and will shortly be
      finalized.

    


    PTCL
      have
      enjoyed the business relationship with M/s Fusion Telecom and looks forward
      to
      opportunities to work together again in the future.

    


    GM
      (Tele-Housing & VoIP)

    


    


    To

    


    Eric
      D. RAM

    Executive
      Vice President-International

    Fusion
      Telecommunications International, Inc.

    420
      Lexington Avenue, Suite 518

    New
      York,
      NY 10170

    


    Copy
      to:

    


    
      	1.  	
              EVP
                (I/C) PTCL H/Qs Islamabad (for
                information).

            


    

    
      	2.  	
              General
                Manager (IR), PTCL H/Qs Islamabad.

            


    

    
      	3.  	
              Abdul
                Hameed Khan C.O.O., Saif Telecom Limited.


            


    

    Fax:
      2270372
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                   EXHIBIT 11


                                CLX ENERGY, INC.
                   Computation of Net Income (Loss) Per Share


                                                 Year ended
                                                September 30,
                                          -------------------------
                                              2002         2001
                                          ------------  -----------
<S>                                       <C>           <C>
Income (loss) before extraordinary item   $(  368,855)  (   40,930)

Extraordinary gain                                  -       45,470
                                          ------------  -----------

Net income (loss)                         $(  368,855)       4,540
                                          ============  ===========

Weighted average number of common
  shares outstanding                        2,631,936    2,634,115

Common equivalent shares
  representing shares issuable
  upon exercise of outstanding
  Options                                           -       49,242
                                          ------------  -----------

                                            2,631,936    2,683,357
                                          ============  ===========

Net income (loss) per share
    Basic:
       Income (loss) from operations      $(     0.14)  (     0.02)
       Extraordinary gain                           -         0.02
                                          ------------  -----------

       Net income (loss)                  $(     0.14)        0.00
                                          ============  ===========

    Diluted:
       Income (loss) from operations      $(     0.14)  (     0.02)
       Extraordinary gain                           -         0.02
                                          ------------  -----------

       Net income (loss)                  $(     0.14)        0.00
                                          ============  ===========
</TABLE>


<PAGE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1996
<CASH>                                       1,513,750
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               31,967,111
<ALLOWANCES>                                   686,179
<INVENTORY>                                 13,488,244
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            48,269,795
<PP&E>                                       7,191,418
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,433,070
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              60,443,816
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       20,157,573
<BONDS>                                      8,714,567
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       151,863
<OTHER-SE>                                  31,239,902
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                60,443,816
<SALES>                                    150,142,529
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           150,142,529
<CGS>                                      119,205,502
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              119,205,502
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                44,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             719,198
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,065,535
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,320,700
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,744,835
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,744,835
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .31
        


</TABLE>
Comerica [ Logo ]
------------------------------------------------------------------
Comerica Bank                               One Detroit Center
                                            500 Woodward Ave.
                                            Detroit, MI 48226-3265
                                            (313) 222-5431

October 23, 1997                            Deborah S. Albrecht
                                            Account Officer
                                            U. S. Banking
                                            Automotive

Mr. W.T. ZurSchmiede, Jr,
Chairman
Federal Screw Works
2400 Buhl Building
Detroit, Michigan 48226


Dear Mr. ZurSchmiede,

Please accept this letter as a revision to the one previously sent
regarding the extension of your Credit Facilities. (The revision
has been underlined.)

Per your request dated September 8, 1997 and pursuant to Section 2.13
of the Revolving Credit and Term Loan Agreement between Federal Screw
Works and Comerica Bank, the Bank has approved the one year extension
for the Revolving Credit Facility and Term Loan option. The new
maturity dates for the facilities are October 31, 2000 and October 31,
2002 respectively.

Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions.


Sincerely,

/s/ Debbie



cc: Wade Plaskey
17.804 Procedures. ( a ) When considering the use of a reverse auction service provider, the contracting officer shall— ( 1 ) Conduct market research for available sources of reverse auction services (*e.g.,* existing agency contracts or agreements, commercial service providers, or Government service providers);
( 2 ) Evaluate the fee structure for each reverse auction service provider; and
( 3 ) Document the contract file that the use of a reverse auction service provider is cost effective.
( b ) When conducting a reverse auction, the contracting officer shall— ( 1 ) Not disclose the identity of the offeror(s) except for the awardee's identity subsequent to an award resulting from the auction (see 3.104-4(a) and (e)(1));
( 2 ) Allow offerors the opportunity to continually revise their prices downward during the reverse auction until the close of the auction; and
( 3 ) Allow an offeror to withdraw an offer from further consideration prior to the close of an auction.
( c ) When using the services of a reverse auction service provider, contracting officers shall— ( 1 ) Include contact information, including contracting officer name and email address, in the synopsis and solicitation that will allow offerors to contact the contracting officer directly with any questions;
( 2 ) Upon receipt of a successful offer, verify that any provider fees or charges included in the price are in accordance with the provider's fee structure, as evaluated in accordance with paragraph (a)(2) of this section; and
( 3 ) Include in the contract file any information and/or documentation received by the reverse auction service provider from offerors responding to the reverse auction.
( d ) If only one offeror participates in an auction, the contracting officer may— ( 1 ) Cancel the auction and document the contract file with evidence of the participation of only one offeror; or
( 2 ) Accept the offer, only if the price is determined to be fair and reasonable (see 13.106-3(a)(2) and 15.404-1).
# Table-151-A

# Table-151-B

# Table-151-C

# Table-151-D

# Table-151-E

# Table-151-F

# Table-151-G

# Table-151-H
#### 17.702 Applicability.

This subpart applies to all acquisitions made by nondefense agencies on behalf of DoD. It does not apply to contracts entered into by a nondefense agency that is an element of the intelligence community for the performance of a joint program conducted to meet the needs of DoD and the nondefense agency.
#### 1532.006-2 Definitions.

The Remedy Coordination Official for EPA is the Assistant Inspector General for Investigations.

[65 FR 37292, June 14, 2000]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          66,918
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                              76
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 5,700
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    348,225
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                      1,149,413
<ALLOWANCE>                                     17,942
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,619,549
<DEPOSITS>                                   1,106,145
<SHORT-TERM>                                   154,884
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             18,689
<LONG-TERM>                                    225,140
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,255
<OTHER-SE>                                     111,436
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,619,549
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 91,731
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               19,307
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 1,402
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               112,440
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              37,572
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              52,717
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           59,723
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    4,975
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                (32)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 17,022
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,533
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       5,533
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       306
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.09
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.12
<LOANS-NON>                                     11,782
<LOANS-PAST>                                     4,169
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                16,951
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                17,771
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    5,423
<RECOVERIES>                                       619
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               17,942
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            16,471
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          1,471


</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Carleton Mitchell, Respondent, v. Walter B. Martin, as Warden of Attica Prison, Appellant.

Order unanimously reversed and relator remanded to County Court of Seneca County for further proceedings, in accordance with the memorandum. Memorandum: The relator was convicted and sentenced for assault, second degree, in Seneca County Court in June of 1944. In 1955, he was convicted of assault, second degree, and sentenced as a second offender in the County Court of Onondaga County. 'Thereafter he petitioned for the issuance of a writ of habeas corpus claiming that before the pronouncement of sentence under the 1944 conviction, the court failed to comply with section 480 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. In his petition for the writ.he asks “-that he be ordered remanded to the Court of Seneca County at Ovid, N. Y., to the end that there be compliance with section 480 of the Code of Criminal Procedure consonant with due process of law.” After a hearing in that proceeding County Judge John S. Conable, of Wyoming County, found that section 480 had not been complied with, and ordered that the relator be remanded to Seneca County for further proceedings upon the 1944 conviction. Upon his appearance, the Seneca County Court reversed and expunged the 1944 judgment of conviction and dismissed the indictment and ordered that relator be remanded to Onondaga County Court for sentence as a first offender upon the 1955 conviction. The record is silent as to just what happened after the order of Seneca County. However, that order was erroneous. The failure of that court to comply with section 480 upon the original sentence did not nullify the conviction, and sentence should have been reimposed after compliance with said section 480. *(People ex rel. La Shombe*v. *Jackson,*7 N Y 2d 345; *People ex rel. Emanuel*v. *McMann,*7 N Y 2d 342; *People ex rel. Miller*v. *Martin,*1 N Y 2d 406.) The order appealed from must be reversed and relator remanded to County Court, Seneca County upon the 1944 conviction for resentenee, after which relator should be remanded to the County Court, Onondaga County, for sentence upon the 1955 conviction as a second offender if, in fact, he was sentenced as a. first offender in accordance with the direction contained in the Seneca County Court order appealed from. (Appeal from order of Seneca County Court directing that the conviction of relator and sentence imposed June 12,1944, be reversed and expunged and that relator be returned to Onondaga County Court for sentence as a second offender.) Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Goldman, McClusky and Henry, JJ.