alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

    <ARTICLE>                         5
           
    <S>                               <C>
    <PERIOD-TYPE>                     12-MOS
    <FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1998
    <PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-1998
    <PERIOD-END>                            DEC-31-1998
    <CASH>                                            0
    <SECURITIES>                                      0
    <RECEIVABLES>                                     0
    <ALLOWANCES>                                      0
    <INVENTORY>                                       0
    <CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  0
    <PP&E>                                            0
    <DEPRECIATION>                                    0
    <TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    0
    <CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             0
    <BONDS>                                           0
    <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
    <PREFERRED>                                       0
    <COMMON>                                          0
    <OTHER-SE>                                  2384819
    <TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      0
    <SALES>                                           0
    <TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  0
    <CGS>                                             0
    <TOTAL-COSTS>                                     0
    <OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  0
    <LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0
    <INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                0
    <INCOME-PRETAX>                                   0
    <INCOME-TAX>                                      0
    <INCOME-CONTINUING>                               0
    <DISCONTINUED>                                    0
    <EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
    <CHANGES>                                         0
    <NET-INCOME>                                      0
    <EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0
    <EPS-DILUTED>                                     0

    
</TABLE>
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

| Print photo |
|-------------|

James Kvaal was confirmed by the U.S. Senate as the Under Secretary of Education on September 14, 2021. Kvaal leads the Department’s work on higher education, student financial aid, and career and adult education. He works to build an inclusive higher education system that helps all students graduate and go on to a better life. His work has led to millions of borrowers receiving student loan forgiveness, more affordable repayment plans for future students, and stronger safeguards against future unaffordable loans.

Earlier in his career, Kvaal served in the White House under President Clinton and President Obama, including more than three years as deputy domestic policy adviser to President Obama. He was the policy director on President Obama’s 2012 campaign, a co-chair of the Biden-Harris campaign’s education advisory committee, and the deputy lead of President Biden’s Department of Education transition team.

Kvaal has also served as Deputy Under Secretary at the Department of Education and as a professional staff member in the U.S. Senate and House of Representatives. Immediately prior to joining the Biden Administration, Kvaal was president of The Institute for College Access & Success (TICAS), a research and advocacy nonprofit dedicated to affordability and equity in higher education. 

Kvaal taught at the University of Michigan's Ford School of Public Policy, and he graduated with honors from Stanford University and Harvard Law School.

----

 

 Printable view

## How Do I Find...

          - Student loans, forgiveness
          - Higher Education Rulemaking
          - College accreditation
          - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
          - FERPA
          - FAFSA
          - 1098, tax forms

More >

## Information About...

          - Elevating Teaching
          - Early Learning
          - Engage Every Student
          - Unlocking Career Success
          - Cybersecurity

 

----

*Our mission*

Student Loans
Repaying LoansDefaulted LoansLoan ForgivenessLoan Servicers

Grants & Programs
Apply for Pell GrantsGrants ForecastApply for a Grant

Laws & Guidance
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)FERPACivil RightsNew IDEA Website

Data & Research
Education StatisticsPostsecondary Education DataED Data ExpressNation's Report CardWhat Works ClearinghouseOpen Data PlatformCOVID Relief Data

About Us
Contact UsED OfficesJobsPress ReleasesFAQsRecursos en españolBudget, PerformancePrivacy Program

----

          - Notices
          - FOIA
          - Privacy Policy
          - Accessibility
          - Security
          - Information quality
          - Inspector General
          - Whitehouse.gov
          - USA.gov
          - Benefits.gov
          - Regulations.gov
          - vote.gov
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           12466
<SECURITIES>                                      1207
<RECEIVABLES>                                   141437
<ALLOWANCES>                                       967
<INVENTORY>                                     157010
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                346100
<PP&E>                                          768321
<DEPRECIATION>                                  461764
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1028080
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           205115
<BONDS>                                         411955
<COMMON>                                         83465
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      153130
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1028080
<SALES>                                         413078
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                413078
<CGS>                                           324373
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   338088
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                (1057)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               17564
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  58483
<INCOME-TAX>                                     21390
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              37093
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     37093
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .44
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .44


</TABLE>
#### 1516.301-70 Payment of fee.

The policy of EPA for cost-reimbursement, term form contracts is to make provisional payment of fee (*i.e.* the fixed fee on cost-plus-fixed-fee type contracts or the base fee on cost-plus-award-fee type contracts) on a percentage of work completed basis, when such a method will not prove detrimental to proper contract performance. Percentage of work completed is the ratio of the direct labor hours performed in relation to the direct labor hours set forth in the contract in clause 48 CFR 1552.211-73, Level of Effort—Cost Reimbursement Contract. Provisional payment of fee will remain subject to withholding provisions, such as in FAR 52.216-8, Fixed Fee.

[82 FR 33019, July 19, 2017]
##### 



Exhibit 31.1
 
      a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andd)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 December 7, 2005
    
    /s/ Marla L. SchaeferMarla L. SchaeferCo-Chief Executive Officer
 21
```

[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 10 (Friday, January 15, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 4046]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-00859]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 1971-079]

Idaho Power Company; Notice of Meeting

    Commission staff will meet with representatives of the Burns Paiute 
Tribe regarding the proposed Hells Canyon Hydroelectric Project. The 
meeting will be held via teleconference on January 28, 2020 at 2 p.m. 
Eastern Standard Time (EST).
    Members of the public, intervenors, and agencies in the referenced 
proceeding and Idaho Power Company may attend this meeting; however, 
participation will be limited to only tribal representatives and 
Commission staff. If the Burns Paiute Tribe decides to disclose 
information about a specific location which could create a risk or harm 
to an archeological site or Native American cultural resource, the 
public will be excused for that portion of the meeting.\1\ If you plan 
to attend this meeting, please contact Michael Davis at (202) 502-8339 
or at [email protected] by January 25, 2020, to receive contact 
information.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Protection from public disclosure involving this kind of 
specific information is based upon 18 CFR 4.32(b)(3)(ii) (2020) of 
the Commission's regulations implementing the Federal Power Act.

    Dated: January 11, 2021.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-00859 Filed 1-14-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
```
Development of Chemical Precipitation Purchased 

Equipment Costs: 

Filter Presses 

Purchased Equipment Costs are the sum of the following cost elements: 

(1) Pump Costs 

(2) Tank Costs 

(3) Chemical Feed System Costs 

(4) Mixer Costs 

(5) Clarifier Costs 

(6) Filter Press Costs 

(7) Sand Filter Costs 

Each cost component includes the cost of freight and associated ancillary equipment such as piping, 

valves, and controllers. 

The following documents provided by a vendor support EPA’s development of cost element (6) by 

providing filter press specifications and example configurations for filter presses used in the Steam 

Electric cost model. 

Note: Only the last diagram in this document, entitled [Redacted] contains CBI information. The vendor 

stated that only the name of the company, [Redacted], is confidential.



[Schematic diagram has been redacted to prevent disclosure of material for which a claim of confidential

business information has been made.]
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Johanna Duffy, Appellant, v. G. A. Fuller Co. et al., Respondents. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.

Appeal from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Board which rescinded an award of death benefits, upon a finding that claimant *726had compromised a third-party action without consent of the carrier. The original award directed the carrier to continue payments pending the outcome of a wrongful death action against a third party, which had been commenced by the executor of decedent’s estate. The executor was a grown son of the deceased and was not a dependent within the meaning of the Workmen’s Compensation Law. This action was terminated more than two years after decedent’s death when the attorneys for the parties signed a stipulation of discontinuance. Prior to this discontinuance, claimant signed an agreement wherein she agreed to withdraw her action and authorized her attorneys to sign a stipulation of discontinuance. The carrier ceased compensation payments upon learning of the executor’s discontinuance. The board rescinded a Referee’s direction of further payments, finding that the discontinuance was a compromise made more than two years after the date of death without the carrier’s consent and that, therefore, the carrier was relieved of liability under subdivision 5 of section 29 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law. The executor was the proper party plaintiff to bring a third-party action and was the representative of the claimant. (Decedent Estate Law, § 130.) A discontinuance is a compromise requiring consent within section 29 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law and taking such action without consent relieves the carrier and the employer of liability even though no prejudice results. *(Matter of Gruhn*v. *Miller Brown, Inc.,*275 App. Div. 975; see, also, *Matter of Clark*v. *Oakes & Burger Co.,*16 A D 2d 490.) Decision affirmed, without costs. Gibson, P. J., Reynolds, Taylor, Aulisi and Hamm, JJ., concur.
### §1771. General Accounting Office study

#### (a) Requirement for study

#### (1) In general

The Comptroller General of the United States shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility and utility of implementing a requirement that each nonimmigrant alien in the United States submit to the Commissioner of Immigration and Naturalization each year a current address and, where applicable, the name and address of an employer.

#### (2) Nonimmigrant alien defined

In paragraph (1), the term "nonimmigrant alien" means an alien described in section 1101(a)(15) of this title.

#### (b) Report

Not later than 1 year after May 14, 2002, the Comptroller General shall submit to Congress a report on the results of the study under subsection (a). The report shall include the Comptroller General's findings, together with any recommendations that the Comptroller General considers appropriate.

(Pub. L. 107–173, title VI, §602, May 14, 2002, 116 Stat. 564.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

General Accounting Office redesignated Government Accountability Office by section 8 of Pub. L. 108–271, set out as a note under section 702 of Title 31, Money and Finance.

#### Abolition of Immigration and Naturalization Service and Transfer of Functions

For abolition of Immigration and Naturalization Service, transfer of functions, and treatment of related references, see note set out under section 1551 of this title.
1319.800 General. ( a ) By Partnership Agreement between the Small Business Administration (SBA) and the Department of Commerce, the SBA delegated authority to the Senior Procurement Executive to enter into 8(a) prime contracts and purchase orders. To implement this authority, the Senior Procurement Executive has authorized a class FAR deviation to applicable portions of FAR Subpart 19.8 and FAR Part 52. Under the class deviation, the authority to enter into 8(a) prime contracts and purchase orders is re-delegated to contracting officers.
( b ) When awarding 8(a) contracts and purchase orders, contracting officers shall operate in accordance with the terms of the Partnership Agreement and take full advantage of the streamlined procedures in the agreement. Contracting officers shall review the responsibilities and procedures for 8(a) awards as outlined in the Partnership Agreement and work closely with their respective Small Business Specialists and the OSDBU.
( c ) The Partnership Agreement contains the procedures for submitting an offer letter to the appropriate SBA office. Contracting officers shall provide a copy of all offering letters to the OSDBU when they are transmitted to SBA.
OFFICEOFTHE ATTORNEYGENERAL OFTEXAS 

AUSTIN 

Honorable W. P. Herme, Jr. 

county Auditor 

Wallor County 

Bempetead, Texas 

Dear Sir: 

011 

edper 

Your raquest ror 

carsfully considered by th 

request as followst 

s been received and 

We quote irom your 

or tax sal 

ounty to purcheso 

pe of services above 

per which is owned by 

0 your qua&ion we call attention to ArAnnotated Civil Statutes, which provides: 

entering upon the dutiss of their 

county judge and euch commissioner 

shell t&e the official oath and shall take a 

written oeth that he will not be aireOtly nor 

‘indirectly interi:etod in any contraot with, or 

claim ageinst. tha county in which he L’(lStBeS, 

except such warrants as may issue to him as fees 

of offios." (Ejmphasis ours) 
Honorable W. P. Herme, Jr., paga 2 

Furthermore we call your attention to Article 373, 

penal Code of Texae, which reads a8 follows: 

*Xi any officer of any county, or of any oity 

or town shall become in any manner pecuniarily interested in any contraots made by such oounty, 

city or town, through its agents, or otherwise, 

for the construction or repair of any bridge, road, 

street, alley or houee or any other work undertaken by such county, city or town, or shall become interested In any bid or proposal for such 

work or in the purchase or sale of/anything made 

for or on acoount of suoh county, city or town, 

or who shall contract for or receive any money 

or property, or the representative of either, or 

any emolument or advantage whatsoever in considoretion of such bid, proposal, contraat, purohaso 

or sale he shall be fined not lees than Fifty 

(‘50,OOf Dell 

e 

ars and not more than yive Hundred 

( ~500.00) Dol1ars.v 

In view of the foregoing authorities, it ,lir~our 

opinion that it is not legal for the County to purchas8 either. 

supplies or the type of service mentioned in your letter from 

a newspaper which is owned by the County Judge. 

JOH: ir 

Very truly your8 

ATT0i-l GE 

fi 

B 

Assistant
#### A. Perlman Iron Works, Inc., Plaintiff, v. George F. Driscoll Company, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant. Alstores Realty Corporation, Third-Party Defendant-Respondent.

Order, entered on June 14, 1963, unanimously reversed on the law, wTith $20 costs and disbursements to appellant, and the motion denied. Our decision in *Corbetia Constr. Go.*v. *Driscoll Go.*(17 A D 2d 176) is not determinative of the issue here presented. In that case the third-party plaintiff sought common-law indemnification from the third-party defendant in the event plaintiff recovered in its action charging Driscoll with tortious interference with its work schedule rather than breach of contract, and the arbitration clause embraced such torts. In the present third-party action Driscoll seeks contractual indemnification from the owner in the event plaintiff recovers in its action for labor and materials furnished. While a breach of a contract might be found to be a wrongful act within the meaning of article 30 of the contract we construe that article when read in its entirety as being here inapplicable (cf. *Matter of Cliiappinelli-Marx [B & L Constr. Corp.],*32 Mise 2d 621, 623). The contract provision (art. 47) providing for arbitration is limited to “disputes, claims or questions subject to arbitration under (the) contract ” as distinguished from an unlimited clause providing for arbitration of any and all disputes arising under the contract. (Cf. 6 Williston, Contracts [rev. ed.], § 1924, p. 5383.) We find no other provision in the contract that makes the present dispute arbitrable. The issue presented herein was not decided in the *Gorbetta*case *{supra)*and the doctrine of collateral estoppel is inapplicable. *{City Bank Farmers Trust Go.*v. *Macfadden,*13 A D 2d 395, 400, affd. 12 N Y 2d 1035.) Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, Eager, Steuer and Bastow, JJ.
<PAGE>

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



We hereby consent to the use, in this Registration Statement on Form N-4 (File
No. 333-94047) of our report dated February 23, 2000, relating to the
consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedules of
Protective Life Insurance Company and Subsidiaries, which appear in such
Registration Statement. We also consent to the use in this registration
statement of our report dated March 20, 2000 on our audits of the financial
statements of the Protective Variable Annuity Separate Account, which appears in
such Registration Statement. We also consent to the reference to our Firm under
the heading "Experts."



/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers, LLP



Birmingham, Alabama
April 24, 2000
#### In the Matter of David W. Corwin, Petitioner, v. Paul Mercier, Respondent.

Motion of respondent to dismiss the proceeding is denied, without costs. The issues raised by the petition and answer are referred to Honorable Isadore Bookstein, Official Referee, to take the proofs of the parties and to report the same to this court together with his opinion thereon with all convenient speed. Motion to preclude petitioner from giving evidence at the trial of the items of which particulars have not been furnished also denied, without costs. We are satisfied that petitioner in good faith has supplied such particulars as are available in the exercise of reasonable diligence. However, he is directed to furnish to respondent such additional particulars as he may later obtain at any time before the proceeding is reached for trial. Bergan, P. J., Coon, Gibson, Reynolds and Taylor, JJ., concur.