alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §2036d. Pilot projects to encourage the use of public-private partnerships committed to addressing food insecurity

#### (a) In general

The Secretary may, on application of eligible entities, approve not more than 10 pilot projects to support public-private partnerships that address food insecurity and poverty.

#### (b) Definitions

For purposes of this section—

(1) the term "eligible entity" means—

(A) a nonprofit organization;

(B) a community-based organization;

(C) an institution of higher education; or

(D) a private entity, as determined by the Secretary; and

(2) the term "public agency" means a department, agency, other unit, or instrumentality of Federal, State, or local government.

#### (c) Project requirements

Projects approved under this section shall—

(1) be limited to 2 years in length; and

(2) include a collaboration between one or more public agencies and one or more eligible entities that—

(A) improves the effectiveness and impact of the supplemental nutrition assistance program;

(B) develops food security solutions that are specific to the needs of a community or region; and

(C) strengthens the capacity of communities to address food insecurity and poverty.

#### (d) Evaluation

The Secretary shall provide for an independent evaluation of pilot projects approved under this section that includes—

(1) a summary of the activities conducted under the pilot projects;

(2) an assessment of the effectiveness of the pilot projects; and

(3) best practices regarding the use of public-private partnerships to improve the effectiveness of public benefit programs to address food insecurity and poverty.

#### (e) Funding

#### (1) Authorization of appropriations

There is authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section $5,000,000 to remain available until expended.

#### (2) Appropriation in advance

Only funds appropriated under paragraph (1) in advance specifically to carry out this section shall be available to carry out this section.

(Pub. L. 88–525, §30, as added Pub. L. 115–334, title IV, §4021, Dec. 20, 2018, 132 Stat. 4652.)
#### GIMBERNAT, Appellant, v. FORGOTSTON, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

November 6, 1903.)

Action by Jules R. Gimbernat against Morris A. Forgotston.

P. M. Crandell, for appellant. C. Putzel, for respondent.

No opinion. Order modified, so far as to allow defendant to appear and answer herein, upon payment of all the costs in the action, the judgment to stand as security, and, as so modified, affirmed, without costs of this appeal.
<PAGE>
                                                Exhibit 10(o)-4

                        AMENDMENT NO. 3

                               TO

               PENNSYLVANIA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY

                  INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN

	WHEREAS, Pennsylvania Power & Light Company ("Company") has 
adopted the Pennsylvania Power & Light Company Incentive Compen-
sation Plan ("Plan") effective January 1, 1987; and
	WHEREAS, the Plan was amended and restated effective July 1, 
1992, and subsequently amended by Amendment No. 1 and 2; and
	WHEREAS, the Company desires to further amend the Plan;
	NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows:
  I.   Effective January 1, 1997, the following sections are 
amended to read:
SECTION 2.  DEFINITIONS.

	"Committee" means two or more non-employee Directors, unless 
otherwise determined by the Board, who have been designated by 
the Board to act as the Committee and qualify as disinterested 
directors under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.  

SECTION 10.  MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS. 

	C.  Tax Withholding.  Participants may be required to pay to 
the Company or an Affiliated Company the amount of any Federal, 
state or local taxes which the Company or an Affiliated Company 
is required to withhold with respect to an Award.  At the request 
of a Participant, or as required by law, such sums as may be 
required for the payment of any estimated or accrued income tax 
liability may be withheld by the Company or an Affiliated Company 
and paid over to the governmental entity entitled to receive the 
same.  A Participant may elect to satisfy all or part of such 
Participant's withholding tax obligation incident to the vesting 
of Restricted Stock by having the Company or an Affiliated 
Company withhold a portion of the shares of Restricted Stock that 
otherwise would be issued to the Participant.  Such shares shall 
be valued at their Fair Market Value on the date when taxes 
otherwise would be withheld in cash.

 II.   Effective January 1, 1997, Section 10.M is deleted in its 
entirety.
III.   Except as provided for in this Amendment No. 3, all other 
provisions of the Plan shall remain in full force and 
effect.
	IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment No. 3 is executed this 
13th day of February, 1997.
                        PENNSYLVANIA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY


                        
                        By:_/s/ John M. Chappelear________
                           John M. Chappelear
                           Vice President-Investments &
                           Pensions
#### Jon Bloomberg et al., Appellants, v NSA Trading Corp. et al., Defendants, and Medi-Cab, Inc., of New York et al., Respondents.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on March 30, 1978, and judgment entered thereon on April 6, 1978, unanimously affirmed for the reasons stated by Nadel, J., at Special Term. Respondents shall recover of appellants $75 costs and disbursements of this appeal. Concur-Murphy, P. J., Lupiano, Fein, Sandier and Suilivan, JJ.
#### A. J. Daley *vs.*Mike Mead.

April 23, 1889.

Appeal from Justice — Effect of Reversal. — Upon an appeal from the judgment of a justice of the peace, upon questions of law alone, a simple judgment of reversal has the effect of a dismissal of the action. Following *Terryll*v. *Bailey,*27 Minn. 304.

Same — Effect of Reversal of Judgment in Replevin. — Upon such a judgment, in an action of replevin, where the property has been delivered to the plaintiff on the writ, the defendant is entitled to judgment for the return of the property, or its value; but this is not a judgment oil the merits, so as to bar another action.

*383Replevin, brought in a justice’s court, for 200 bushels of barley, of the value of $75. In his answer the defendant pleaded (among other things:) “Defendant denies that plaintiff is or was entitled to any portion of the 200 bushels of barley at any time, and denies the allegation that he had taken and did unjustly detain the same from plaintiff at any time.” On plaintiff’s motion the answer was stricken out, and judgment rendered for plaintiff. On.appeal, on questions of law alone, to the district court for Rock county, judgment of reversal and for return of the property (which had been taken on the writ and delivered to plaintiff) was ordered by *Perkins,*J., and entered, from which the plaintiff appeals.

*A. J. Daley,*appellant, *pro se.*

*Albert Barck,*for respondent.

Mitchell, J.

We think that the fair construction to be given to the imperfect and crude return of the justice in this case is that plaintiff’s motion was not an objection to defendant’s answer merely as not being “sufficiently explicit to enable him to understand it,” but amotion to strike it out as not containing any3 defence. If the return was so inaccurate as not to show the actual iacts, plaintiff should have moved for an amended one. While the answer is informal, as is usual with pleadings in justice’s court, yet we think it put in issue material allegations of the complaint, and contained a defence, and hence was improperly stricken out by the justice. The district court was therefore right in reversing the judgment in favor of the plaintiff. The appeal being on questions of law alone, and there being no provision of statute for remanding the cause to the justice for retrial, and the case not being before the district court in proper form to determine the merits, a reversal of the judgment of the justice operated as a dismissal of the action, and left the parties *in statu quo*as if no action had ever been commenced. Upon such reversal in an action of replevin, the plaintiff having obtained possession of the property under the writ, the right of the defendant to a return of the property, or its value, follows of course, and the district judge was right in so ordering. This, however, is not a judgment on the merits, so as to bar another action. *Terryll*v. *Bailey,*27 Minn. 304, (7 N. W. Rep. 261.)

Judgment affirmed.
EXHIBIT 10(c)







                              AMENDMENT NO. 2
                TO THE EMPLOYEES' STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN OF 
                  AMERICAN WATER WORKS COMPANY, INC. AND
                        ITS DESIGNATED SUBSIDIARIES
                  (As Amended Effective January 1, 1989)




     Pursuant to the power reserved to it in Section 13.1 of the Employees'
Stock Ownership Plan of American Water Works Company, Inc. and its
Designated Subsidiaries, as amended effective January 1, 1989, ("Plan"),
American Water Works Company, Inc. hereby amends the Plan, effective
January 1, 1995, as follows:

     1.  SECTION 1.40 is hereby deleted in its entirety and the following
         is inserted in lieu thereof:

         Section 1.40  "Subsidiary" means any corporation, association or
         business trust, 50% or more of whose voting stock (not including
         shares having voting power only upon the happening of an event of
         default) is or was owned, directly or indirectly, by American
         Water Works Company, Inc., or by any corporation which was a
         constituent in a merger, consolidation, liquidation, transfer of
         substantially all of its assets in exchange for stock, or similar
         combination of corporations with or into the Company.

     2.  SECTION 2.1 is hereby deleted in its entirety and the following is
         inserted in lieu thereof:

         2.1   Eligibility Rule.  Except as provided in Section 2.2, an
         Employee shall be eligible to participate in the Plan beginning on
         the January 1 following his date of hire.

     3.  SECTION 10.11 is hereby added as follows:

         10.11  Distributions Pursuant to a Qualified Domestic Relations
         Order ("QDRO").  Unless otherwise provided by the QDRO, an
         Alternate Payee shall be entitled to elect any of the distribution
         options available under Section 10 to a "Terminated Participant".
<PAGE>
     To record the adoption of this Amendment No. 2 to the Plan, American
Water Works Company has affixed its corporate name and seal this 3rd day of
July, 1996.

                                 AMERICAN WATER WORKS COMPANY, INC.



                                 By:  George W. Johnstone
                                      President and Chief Executive Officer


(Corporate Seal)



Attest:  W. Timothy Pohl
         General Counsel and Secretary

                                     2
# University of the United States (UUS)

##  Graduate/Professional College Financing Plan 

### Student Name, Identifier

## Scholarship and Grant Options

Scholarships and Grants are considered "Gift" aid - no repayment is needed. Housing, food, or transportation may be considered taxable.

## Loan and Work Options to Pay the Net Price to You

You must repay loans, plus interest and fees.  

* For federal student loans, origination fees are deducted from loan proceeds. 

## For More Information

University of the United States (UUS)Financial Aid Office

## * Loan Amounts

Note that the amounts listed                    are the maximum available to you. To learn about loan repayment choices and calculate your Federal Loan monthly payment, go                    to:                    https://studentaid.gov/manage-loans/repayment/plans.                

## Next steps

## Customized Information from UUS
#### John Romito et al., Respondents, v. Bourjois, Inc., Appellant.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, medical expenses and loss of services resulting from the use of a body deodorant manufactured and sold by defendant, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated December 19, 1961, which, *inter*alia, granted plaintiffs’ motion to examine defendant before trial. Order modified: (a) by striking out all the decretal paragraphs except the fifth, which provides that plaintiffs’ motion for a discovery and inspection is denied; and (b) by substituting a paragraph denying plaintiffs’ motion for examination before trial and for production of books, records, etc., under section 296 of the Civil Practice Act. As so modified, order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements to defendant. Plaintiffs filed their note of issue and their statement of readiness on November 23, 1959. They made no effort to obtain an examination of defendant before trial until they made a motion therefor about a year and a half thereafter (a motion previous to the one upon which the order presently reviewed was made). In our opinion, the record does not justify the conclusion that the necessity, if any, for an examination before trial, resulted from unusual and unanticipated conditions which developed subsequent to the filing of the statement of readiness (see former Special Rules, Appellate Division — Second Department, Special Readiness Rule, subd. 9, par. e). Ughetta, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Brennan and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
### §203. Jurisdiction; amount in controversy

An action or proceeding falling under the Convention shall be deemed to arise under the laws and treaties of the United States. The district courts of the United States (including the courts enumerated in section 460 of title 28) shall have original jurisdiction over such an action or proceeding, regardless of the amount in controversy.

(Added Pub. L. 91–368, §1, July 31, 1970, 84 Stat. 692.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective upon the entry into force of the Convention on Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards with respect to the United States (Dec. 29, 1970), see section 4 of Pub. L. 91–368, set out as a note under section 201 of this title.
```

[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 11 (Tuesday, January 19, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 5226]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-00986]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health

National Institute of General Medical Sciences; Notice of Closed 
Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: NIGMS Initial Review Group, Training and 
Workforce Development Subcommittee--A Review of Predoctoral 
Institutional Research Training and MSTP T32 Grant applications.
    Date: March 4-5, 2021.
    Time: 10:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Natcher Building, 45 
Center Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Video Meeting).
    Contact Person: Isaah S. Vincent, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Office of Scientific Review, National Institute of General 
Medical Sciences, National Institutes of Health, 45 Center Drive, 
Room 3AN12L, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 594-2948, 
[email protected].

    Name of Committee: NIGMS Initial Review Group, Training and 
Workforce Development Subcommittee--C Review of IRACDA and Bridges 
to the Baccalaureate applications.
    Date: March 12, 2021.
    Time: 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Natcher Building, 45 
Center Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Video Meeting).
    Contact Person: Lee Warren Slice, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Office of Scientific Review, National Institutes of General 
Medical Sciences, National Institutes of Health, 45 Center Drive, 
Room 3AN18A, Bethesda, MD 20814, (301) 435-0807, 
[email protected].

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.375, 
Minority Biomedical Research Support; 93.821, Cell Biology and 
Biophysics Research; 93.859, Pharmacology, Physiology, and 
Biological Chemistry Research; 93.862, Genetics and Developmental 
Biology Research; 93.88, Minority Access to Research Careers; 93.96, 
Special Minority Initiatives; 93.859, Biomedical Research and 
Research Training, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 12, 2021.
Miguelina Perez,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2021-00986 Filed 1-15-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
```
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-40495

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

PEDRO VICENTE VARGAS-FERNANDEZ,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:13-CR-1187-1

Before DAVIS, JONES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Pedro Vicente Vargas-Fernandez

has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with 

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 

229 (5th Cir. 2011). Vargas-Fernandez has not filed a response. We have 

reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected 

therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 16, 2015

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 14-40495 Document: 00513081136 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/16/2015
No. 14-40495

2

nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave 

to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities 

herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 14-40495 Document: 00513081136 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/16/2015
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

Releases            - EDgov Blog  
            - Media advisories  
            - Press releases  
            - Secretary's weekly schedule
            - Speeches  
            - Videos and photos

Get connected

  USEDGov

  ED.gov
Contacts
Reporters and education writers may contact the U.S. Department of Education press office by phone at (202) 401-1576 or by mail at U.S. Department of Education Press Office, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW, 7E-247, Washington, DC 20202.

Ed Stakeholders ForumGO >

Archived information from previous administration

## How Do I Find...

          - Student loans, forgiveness
          - College accreditation
          - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
          - FERPA
          - FAFSA
          - 1098, tax forms

More >

## Information About...

          - Transforming Teaching
          - Family and Community Engagement
          - Early Learning

 

|  |
|--|
|  |
|  | Grants & Contracts |  |
|  |
|  | Student Financial Aid |  |
|  |
|  | Research & Statistics |  |
|  |
|  | Policy & Guidance |  |
|  |
|  | Programs |  |
|  |

----

*Our mission*

Student Loans
Repaying LoansDefaulted LoansLoan ForgivenessLoan Servicers

Grants & Programs
Apply for Pell GrantsGrants ForecastApply for a GrantEligibility for Grants

Laws & Guidance
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)FERPACivil RightsNew IDEA Website

Data & Research
Education StatisticsPostsecondary Education DataED Data ExpressNation's Report CardWhat Works Clearinghouse

About Us
Contact UsED OfficesJobsPress ReleasesFAQsRecursos en españolBudget, PerformancePrivacy ProgramSubscribe to E-Mail Updates

----

          - Notices
          - FOIA
          - Privacy Policy
          - Accessibility
          - Security
          - Information quality
          - Inspector General
          - Whitehouse.gov
          - USA.gov
          - Benefits.gov
          - Regulations.gov
S. 782 

One Hundred Fifteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE FIRST SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and seventeen 

An Act 

To reauthorize the National Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force Program, 

and for other purposes. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Providing Resources, Officers, 

and Technology To Eradicate Cyber Threats to Our Children Act 

of 2017’’ or the ‘‘PROTECT Our Children Act of 2017’’. 

SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF THE NATIONAL INTERNET CRIMES 

AGAINST CHILDREN TASK FORCE PROGRAM. 

Title I of the PROTECT Our Children Act of 2008 (34 U.S.C. 

21101 et seq.) is amended in section 107(a)(10) (34 U.S.C. 

21117(a)(10)), by striking ‘‘fiscal year 2018’’ and inserting ‘‘each 

of fiscal years 2018 through 2022’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
16.502 Definite-quantity contracts. ( a ) *Description.* A definite-quantity contract provides for delivery of a definite quantity of specific supplies or services for a fixed period, with deliveries or performance to be scheduled at designated locations upon order.
( b ) *Application.* A definite-quantity contract may be used when it can be determined in advance that ( 1 ) a definite quantity of supplies or services will be required during the contract period and
( 2 ) the supplies or services are regularly available or will be available after a short lead time.
[48 FR 42219, Sept. 19, 1983, as amended at 60 FR 49725, Sept. 26, 1995]
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23


Consent of Independent Auditors


The Board of Directors
Am Communications, Inc.

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements on
Form S-8 (No. 33-53822 and No. 33-81500) of AM Communications, Inc. of our
report dated May 27, 1998, except as to Note 14, as to which the date is July 9,
1998, relating to the balance sheets of AM Communications, Inc. as of March 28,
1998 and March 29, 1997 and the related statements of operations, stockholders'
equity, and cash flows for the years then ended, which report is included in
the March 28, 1998 Annual Report of Form 10-KSB of AM Communications, Inc.


KPMG Peat Marwick LLP




Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
July 9, 1998