alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Joseph Morin, Appellant, v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company et al., Respondents.

Judgment dismissing plaintiff’s complaint unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of directing a new trial as against the defendant, the New York Central Railroad Company, with costs to abide the event, and as so modified, otherwise affirmed, with costs to the defendant, the Pennsylvania Railroad, as against the plaintiff-appellant. The cause of action directed against the Pennsylvania Railroad was properly dismissed. The law of Massachusetts — which is coneededly applicable here — frees that defendant of liability. Pennsylvania’s responsibility for the freight car terminated when it relinquished control of the car to Central with a reasonable chance for the latter to inspect and discover the overt defect *(Glynn*v. *Central R. R. Co., 175*Mass. 510). With respect to New York Central, however, the dismissal was improper. *Proof*that the plaintiff — as a preliminary to unloading the ear with the implicit assent of Central-—-attempted to open the door whereupon it fell upon him, coupled with the testimony as to the defective condition of the top rail, suffices to make out a prima facie case of negligence against this defendant *(Corbett*v. *New York Cent, & Hudson Riv. R. R. Co.,*215 Mass. 435). Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, Steuer and Staley, JJ.
**UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION**

# THE  SECRETARY

MEMORANDUM

FROM:The Secretary

THRU:Chief of Staff

TO:**Executive Officer**

SUBJECT:Delegation of Authority to Sign EEO Settlements on Behalf of the Office of the Secretary

I.DELEGATION

As the Head of the Office of the Secretary, I delegate to you the authority to affix your signature as the authorizing official, who is permitted to legally bind this Office, with respect to written agreements that settle internal employment discrimination complaints, informal and formal, that involve this Office.

II. RESERVATION

This authority extends to the settlement of any internal employment discrimination complaint, even those that include but not limited to those involving back pay, attorney's fees and costs, expert fees and costs, interest (front and back), and liquidated or compensatory damages, PROVIDED:

Prior approval for the settlement and the terms of the agreement in question were given expressly by the Chief of Staff or the Secretary.

II. REDELEGATION

This authority may not be redelegated.

__________/s/___________

                          Richard W. Riley

OGC Clearance and Date:  /s/ R. Wexler, 6/24/1993

Certified on:  6/28/1993

Departmental Delegations Control Officer:  /s/ Wilma Hodo

Control Number:  **EA/EA-1/12**
##### 



Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Claires Stores, Inc.
(the Company) for the period ended November 2, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Marla
Schaefer, Acting Co-Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                  |  |                                                 
|----------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------
|                  |  | /s/ Marla Schaefer                              
|                  |  |                                                 
|December 16, 2002 |  | Marla Schaefer
Acting Co-Chief Executive
Officer
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

HelpSITE CONTENTS
|  |
|--|
Exhibit
31.1



CERTIFICATIONS
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302

OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I,
Nick Tsahalis, certify that:



1.
I have reviewed this amendment to quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Reliability Incorporated; and



2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by this report.



Date:
June 18, 2020



|/s/
    Nick Tsahalis       | 
|--------------------------- | 
|Chief
    Executive Officer |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF FAIR GROUNDS CORPORATION FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED JULY
31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-2000
<CASH>                                           8,922
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      733
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        131
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                11,169
<PP&E>                                          52,981
<DEPRECIATION>                                  18,914
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  48,611
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,575
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,525
<OTHER-SE>                                      28,893
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    48,611
<SALES>                                         30,228
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                36,156
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   31,358
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,298
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  14
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,536
<INCOME-TAX>                                       938
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,597
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    206
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,804
<EPS-BASIC>                                       3.84
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     3.84


</TABLE>
15.202 Advisory multi-step process. ( a ) The agency may publish a presolicitation notice (see 5.204) that provides a general description of the scope or purpose of the acquisition and invites potential offerors to submit information that allows the Government to advise the offerors about their potential to be viable competitors. The presolicitation notice should identify the information that must be submitted and the criteria that will be used in making the initial evaluation. Information sought may be limited to a statement of qualifications and other appropriate information (e.g., proposed technical concept, past performance, and limited pricing information). At a minimum, the notice shall contain sufficient information to permit a potential offeror to make an informed decision about whether to participate in the acquisition. This process should not be used for multi-step acquisitions where it would result in offerors being required to submit identical information in response to the notice and in response to the initial step of the acquisition.
( b ) The agency shall evaluate all responses in accordance with the criteria stated in the notice, and shall advise each respondent in writing either that it will be invited to participate in the resultant acquisition or, based on the information submitted, that it is unlikely to be a viable competitor. The agency shall advise respondents considered not to be viable competitors of the general basis for that opinion. The agency shall inform all respondents that, notwithstanding the advice provided by the Government in response to their submissions, they may participate in the resultant acquisition.
### §6617. Authorization of appropriations and spending authority

#### (a) Authorization of appropriations

Except as provided in subsection (b), there are authorized to be appropriated—

(1) an amount not to exceed 5 percent of the sum of—

(A) the sums received by the Secretary from sales of timber and other products of the forests; and

(B) user fees paid in connection with the use of forest lands; and

(2) such additional sums as may be necessary to carry out the purposes of this subchapter.

#### (b) Limitation on authorization

Subsection (a) shall not in any way affect payments to the States pursuant to section 500 of title 16.

#### (c) Spending authority

Any spending authority (as defined in section 651 of title 2) provided in this subchapter shall be effective for any fiscal year only to such extent or in such amounts as are provided in appropriation Acts.

(Pub. L. 101–624, title XXIII, §2379, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 4049.)
#### In the Matter of the Final Accounting of Lester Pawpaw, as Committee of the Person and Property of Harry Pawpaw, an Incompetent Person. Harry J. Pawpaw, Former Incompetent, Appellant; William J. Glinnen, as Attorney for Committee, Respondent.

Motion referred to the court that rendered the decision. Nolan, P. J., Beldoek, Ughetta, Kleinfeld and Christ, JJ., concur. Motion to amend order entered April 11, 1960 denied, without costs. Nolan, P. J., Beldoek, Ughetta and' Brennan, JJ., concur; Kleinfeld, J., not voting.
EXHIBIT B

Case: 1:12-cv-01410 Document #: 161-2 Filed: 06/22/15 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:1520
§ 552.35 Rights-of-entry for survey and exploration. ( a ) *Voluntary.* Where it is necessary to enter upon non-Government-owned real estate during site selection, particularly for the purpose of conducting topographic surveys and test borings, the appropriate division or district engineer will negotiate rights-of-entry for survey and exploration. The instrument is in the nature of a license which does not convey an interest in land but precludes the entry from being a trespass. Since the entry is for a limited purpose and for a relatively short period of time, the landowner is not offered rental for the privileges requested. Where the landowner insists upon payment for the privileges requested, district engineers are authorized to negotiate short-term co-use leases, within the limits of existing regulations.
( b ) *Involuntary.* Where rights-of-entry for survey and exploration or short-term co-use leases cannot be negotiated, the right-of-entry may be obtained through the institution of proceedings for the condemnation of a short-term co-use leasehold interest. This action is taken only where it can be shown that the entry is imperative and that it is impossible to negotiate a voluntary right-of-entry or short-term co-use lease.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
EMONS TRANSPORTATION GROUP, INC. CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE
SIX MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>   1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                              JUL-1-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       1,421,794
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,487,082
<ALLOWANCES>                                    99,385
<INVENTORY>                                    181,707
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,227,920
<PP&E>                                      28,376,203
<DEPRECIATION>                               9,082,752
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              23,732,063
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,674,318
<BONDS>                                     10,728,197
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     14,023
<COMMON>                                        59,927
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,945,424
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                23,732,063
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             8,024,193
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,446,778
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             500,673
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                623,516
<INCOME-TAX>                                   244,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            379,516
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   379,516
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.04
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the 
February 28, 1998 Form 10-Q and is qualified in its entirety by reference 
to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-28-1998
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  557,144
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    811,147
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,491,266
<PP&E>                                       1,622,596
<DEPRECIATION>                                 837,227
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,725,550
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,188,590
<BONDS>                                        530,926
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    100,072
<COMMON>                                       502,545
<OTHER-SE>                                     336,438
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,725,550
<SALES>                                      4,342,180
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,413,341
<CGS>                                        4,165,211
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,196,543
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              35,329
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (214)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,908)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             20,427
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    20,427
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>
#### Jerome Silverman, Administrator (Estate of Harold Nathan) *v.*St. Joseph Hospital et al.

*Ira H. Goldman, Marshall 8. Feingold*and *Dion W. Moore,*in support of the application.

Submitted October 29

decided November 6, 1974

The application by the Connecticut Bar Association for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae in the appeal from the Superior Court in Fairfield County at Stamford is granted provided the brief is filed on or before November 29, 1974, and is prepared in accordance with the requirements of §§ 723 and 724 of the Practice Book, as amended.
Exhibit 11

                Exolon-ESK Company and Subsidiaries
                 Computation of Earnings Per Share
               (In Thousands, Except Per Share Data)

                                           Three Months
                                         Ended March 31,

                                          1997     1996

           Net earnings                  $1,348    $1,410
           Less Preferred Stock Dividends:

                Series A                    (5)       (5)

                Series B                    (5)       (5)
           Undistributed earnings        $1,338    $1,400

           Net earnings attributable to:

                Common Stock (50.0%)        669       700
                Class A Common Stock        669       700
                 (50.0%)

                                         $1,338    $1,400

           Net earnings per share of
              Common Stock:
                Primary                   $1.39     $1.45
                Fully Diluted             $1.34     $1.40

           Net earnings per share of 
             Class A Common Stock:
                Primary                   $1.30     $1.36

                Fully Diluted             $1.26     $1.32

           Weighted Average Shares
             Outstanding:
                Primary:

                Common Stock            482,000   482,000
                Class A Common Stock    513,000   513,000

                Fully Diluted:

                Common Stock            504,000   504,000
                Class A Common Stock    535,000   535,000
- mn-uofm-1-complaint
- '05242153 Recipient Notification Letter' of '24-00861-F Chicago'
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18-3241

_____________________________

M.G.,

Appellant,

v.

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF 

CHILDREN AND FAMILIES,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County.

Jonathan Sjostrom, Judge.

February 12, 2019

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WETHERELL, OSTERHAUS, and WINOKUR, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Valarie Linnen, Jacksonville, for Appellant.

Sara J. Rumph, Appellate Legal Counsel, Children's Legal 

Services, Tallahassee, for Appellee Florida Department of 

Children and Families.

Thomasina Moore, Statewide Director of Appeals, and Joanna 

Summers Brunell, Appellate Counsel, Florida Statewide Guardian 

ad Litem Program, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 752 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to clarify that products derived 

from tar sands are crude oil for purposes of the Federal excise tax 

on petroleum, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 28, 2017 

Mr. MARKEY (for himself, Mr. SANDERS, and Mr. WHITEHOUSE) introduced 

the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee 

on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to clarify 

that products derived from tar sands are crude oil for 

purposes of the Federal excise tax on petroleum, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Tar Sands Tax Loop5 hole Elimination Act’’. 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 752 IS

1 SEC. 2. CLARIFICATION OF TAR SANDS AS CRUDE OIL FOR 

2 EXCISE TAX PURPOSES. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (1) of section 4612(a) 

4 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended to read 

5 as follows: 

6 ‘‘(1) CRUDE OIL.—The term ‘crude oil’ includes 

7 crude oil condensates, natural gasoline, any bitumen 

8 or bituminous mixture, any oil derived from a bitu9 men or bituminous mixture (including oil derived 

10 from tar sands), and any oil derived from kerogen11 bearing sources (including oil derived from oil 

12 shale).’’. 

13 (b) REGULATORY AUTHORITY TO ADDRESS OTHER

14 TYPES OF CRUDE OIL AND PETROLEUM PRODUCTS.— 

15 Subsection (a) of section 4612 of such Code is amended 

16 by adding at the end the following new paragraph: 

17 ‘‘(10) REGULATORY AUTHORITY TO ADDRESS

18 OTHER TYPES OF CRUDE OIL AND PETROLEUM

19 PRODUCTS.—Under such regulations as the Sec20 retary may prescribe, the Secretary may include as 

21 crude oil or as a petroleum product subject to tax 

22 under section 4611, any fuel feedstock or finished 

23 fuel product customarily transported by pipeline, 

24 vessel, railcar, or tanker truck if the Secretary deter25 mines that— 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 752 IS

1 ‘‘(A) the classification of such fuel feed2 stock or finished fuel product is consistent with 

3 the definition of oil under the Oil Pollution Act 

4 of 1990, and 

5 ‘‘(B) such fuel feedstock or finished fuel 

6 product is produced in sufficient commercial 

7 quantities as to pose a significant risk of haz8 ard in the event of a discharge.’’. 

9 (c) TECHNICAL AMENDMENT.—Paragraph (2) of sec10 tion 4612(a) of such Code is amended by striking ‘‘from 

11 a well located’’. 

12 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

13 this section shall take effect on the date of the enactment 

14 of this Act. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**


****


**STATMON
        TECHNOLOGIES CORP.**


CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


19
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the Annual Report of Statmon Technologies Corp. (the "Company")
      on Form 10-KSB for the year ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
      Geoffrey P. Talbot, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to
      18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that to the best of my knowledge:




(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




**Geoffrey
              P. Talbot**
              Chief
                Financial Officer
              July
                16, 2007




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to Statmon Technologies Corp. and will be
      retained by Statmon Technologies Corp. and furnished to the Securities and
      Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.