alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 1, 2021

No. 04-18-00411-CV

REPSOL OIL AND GAS USA, LLC as successor of Talisman Energy USA Inc, Statoil Texas 

Onshore Properties, LLC, and Statoil Pipelines, LLC, and OGE, LLC,

Appellants

v.

MATRIX PETROLEUM, LLC, Matrix Petroleum Holdings LLC, JAR Resources Holdings, 

L.P., and TMRX Petroleum, LLC,

Appellees

From the 218th Judicial District Court, La Salle County, Texas

Trial Court No. 14-08-00158-CVL

Honorable Russell Wilson, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Beth Watkins, Justice

On August 30, 2021, all parties to this appeal jointly filed an Amended Joint Motion for 

Oral Argument Schedule. The Court GRANTS the parties’ motion, and ORDERS that the 

schedule for oral argument will be as follows:

Statoil’s Opening Argument: 15 minutes

Repsol’s Opening Argument: 15 minutes

Matrix’s Argument: 15 minutes

OGE’s Argument: 15 minutes

Statoil’s Rebuttal Argument: 10 minutes

Repsol’s Rebuttal Argument: 10 minutes

It is so ORDERED September 1, 2021.
PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:__________________________

 MICHAEL A. CRUZ, 

 CLERK OF COURT
#### In the Matter of Charles J. King et al., Respondents, against H. Bogart Seaman, as County Treasurer of Nassau County, et al., Respondents, and Sadie Schwartz, Appellant.

In a proceeding pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Act, Sadie Schwartz, the purchaser of a tax lien upon and the holder of a tax deed to certain real property, appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered September 28, 1959, which, *inter alia,*directed the County Treasurer of said county to permit two of the petitioners, Dorothy King and Patricia Ann Mackin, to redeem the tax lien and directed said treasurer and county, upon the treasurer’s receipt of the redemption price, to cancel the tax lien and deed. Order affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Ughetta, Christ and Brennan, JJ., concur.
19.502-3 Partial set-asides of contracts other than multiple-award contracts. ( a ) The contracting officer shall set aside a portion or portions of an acquisition, except for construction, for exclusive small business participation when— ( 1 ) Market research indicates that a total set-aside is not appropriate (see 19.502-2);
( 2 ) The requirement can be divided into distinct portions;
( 3 ) The acquisition is not subject to simplified acquisition procedures;
( 4 ) Two or more responsible small business concerns are reasonably expected to submit offers on the set-aside portion or portions of the acquisition that are competitive in terms of fair market prices, quality, and delivery;
( 5 ) The specific program eligibility requirements identified in this part apply; and
( 6 ) The solicitation will result in a contract other than a multiple-award contract (see 2.101 for definition of multiple-award contract).
( b ) When the contracting officer determines that a requirement is to be partially set aside, the solicitation shall identify which portion or portions are set aside and not set aside.
( c ) The contracting officer shall specify in the solicitation how offers shall be submitted with regard to the set-aside and non-set-aside portions.
( d ) Offers received from concerns that do not qualify as small business concerns shall be considered nonresponsive and shall be rejected on the set-aside portion of partial set-asides. However, before rejecting an offer otherwise eligible for award because of questions concerning the size representation, an SBA determination must be obtained (see subpart 19.3).
[85 FR 11761, Feb. 27, 2020]
2003 AQMP - 2010 STATIONARY BASELINE EMISSIONS - NO GROWTH - SOX AND PM10 BY MAJOR SOURCE CATEGORY (T/DRoad DustSOx PM10 SOx PM10 PM10 SOx PM10010 Electric Utilities 0.22 0.75 0.22 0.75020 Cogeneration 0.01 0.66 0.00 0.02 0.01 0.67030 Oil and Gas Production (Combustion) 0.01 0.13 0.00 0.03 0.01 0.16040 Petroleum Refining (Combustion) 0.00 2.32 0.00 2.32050 Manufacturing and Industrial 0.09 1.15 0.36 1.01 0.45 2.15052 Food and Agricultural Processing 0.00 0.09 0.00 0.10 0.01 0.18060 Service and Commercial 0.46 0.71 0.14 0.16 0.60 0.87099 Other (Fuel Combustion) 0.15 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.30110 Sewage Treatment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00120 Landfills 0.12 0.17 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.17130 Incinerators 0.07 0.08 0.07 0.08199 Other (Waste Disposal) 0.00 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.12210 Laundering 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00220 Degreasing 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00230 Coatings and Related Process Solvents 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.05240 Printing 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00250 Sealants & Adhesives 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00299 Other (Cleaning and Surface Coatings) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00310 Oil and Gas Production 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02320 Petroleum Refining 4.31 0.76 4.31 0.76330 Petroleum Marketing 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.03399 Other (Petroleum Production and Marketing) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00410 Chemical 0.00 0.38 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.38420 Food and Agriculture 0.00 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.19430 Mineral Processes 0.01 2.07 0.00 1.07 0.01 3.14440Metal Processes0.030.790.000.000.030.79Point Area Total StationarySumNameMSCG:\AIR-3\Permit Programs\NSR Info\District NSR Rulemaking\By Districts\South Coast\Rule 1315\TSD support Docs\Excel Spreadsheets\No Growth PM10440MetalProcesses0.030.790.000.000.030.79450 Wood and Paper 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.96 0.00 1.01460 Glass and Related Products 0.21 0.23 0.21 0.23470 Electronics 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00499 Other (Industrial Processes) 0.00 0.15 0.00 0.15NOX/SOX Reclaim 12.03 12.03Total Emissions (T/D) 181113018.214.5Annual Average inventory.Rounds off may introduce slight discrepancies in totals.G:\AIR-3\Permit Programs\NSR Info\District NSR Rulemaking\By Districts\South Coast\Rule 1315\TSD support Docs\Excel Spreadsheets\No Growth PM10
1401.7001-4 Acquisition performance measurement systems. ( a ) The acquisition performance measurement system is a three-pronged approach that includes self assessment, statistical data for validation and flexible quality reviews and assessment techniques. This system is required to: ( 1 ) Evaluate the effectiveness and efficiency of bureau and office acquisition systems;
( 2 ) Assess the adequacy of policies, procedures and regulations governing the acquisition process; and
( 3 ) Identify and implement changes necessary to improve the systems.
( b ) HCA's are responsible for ensuring contracting activity compliance with law and regulations through the review and oversight process.
-- Converted by SECPublisher 3.1.0.1, created by BCL Technologies Inc., for SEC Filing







	
RENEWAL AGREEMENT







THIS AGREEMENT made as of the 29th day of March 2006, among WORDLOGIC COPRORATION, a corporation under the laws of Nevada having its principal business office at Suite 2400, 650 West Georgia Street, Vancouver, British Columbia V6B 4N7 (“WordLogic”), Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, and
RICHARD KOZUKAN, businessman, of 1152D Forge Walk, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6H 3P9, Canada (“Kozukan”). 

	
WITNESSES THAT WHEREAS:





A. Pursuant to Loan Agreement made between the WordLogic and Kozukan as of Match 31, 2003 (the “Loan Agreement”) Kozukan agreed lend to WordLogic and WordLogic
agreed to borrow from Kozukan the sum of up to One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) in Canadian funds (the “Loan”) in incremental advances as WordLogic required working capital on the terms and conditions set out in the Loan Agreement.



B. WordLogic and Kozukan wish to renew the term of the Loan Agreement for another twenty four (24) months under the same terms and conditions as the Loan
Agreement.


NOW THEREFORE in consideration of the premises and the covenants and agreements of the parties hereto as hereinafter set forth, the parties hereto covenant and agree as follows: 


1. Term. WordLogic and Kozukan will extend the Term of the Loan Agreement for an additional twenty four (24) months commencing from April 1,
2006. 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties have executed this Agreement with effect as of the day and year first above written. 

	
WORDLOGIC CORPORATION.




	
By: 
		
 		
/s/ Frank Evanshen 
	
	
		
		


	
	
Name: 
		
 		
FRANK EVANSHEN 
	
	
		
		


	
	
Title 
		
 		
PRESIDENT & CEO 
	
	
		
		


	
	
Date: 
		
 		
March 29, 2006 
	
	
		
		


	



	
RICHARD KOZUKAN




	
Witness




	
/s/ Richard Kozukan 

DATE: March 29, 2006





IWM\IWM09252
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 810 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 810

To facilitate construction of a bridge on certain property in Christian 
               County, Missouri, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 4, 2017

  Mr. Blunt (for himself and Mrs. McCaskill) introduced the following 
bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment 
                            and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To facilitate construction of a bridge on certain property in Christian 
               County, Missouri, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RIVERSIDE BRIDGE PROJECT.

    (a) In General.--The Riverside Bridge Project is authorized to be 
carried out notwithstanding--
            (1) any agreement entered unto under, or restriction 
        pursuant to, section 404(b)(2) of the Robert T. Stafford 
        Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 
        5170c(b)(2)); or
            (2) any other Federal restriction that requires the covered 
        property to be maintained for open space, recreation, or 
        wetland management.
    (b) Conditions.--As a condition of the authorization under 
subsection (a), Christian County, Missouri--
            (1) shall carry out the Riverside Bridge Project in a 
        manner that ensures that no flood damage attributable to the 
        Project occurs; and
            (2) shall be liable for any such flood damage that does 
        occur.
    (c) Disaster Assistance Prohibited.--No Federal financial 
assistance pursuant to the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and 
Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5121 et seq.) may be provided with 
respect to the covered property or any improvements thereon.
    (d) Definitions.--In this Act, the following definitions apply:
            (1) Covered property.--The term ``covered property'' means 
        the property--
                    (A) in Christian County, Missouri;
                    (B) conveyed to such County by the Riverside Inn, 
                Inc.; and
                    (C) that is approximately 1.5 acres and 482 lineal 
                feet adjacent to the westerly line of Riverside Road to 
                the center of Finley Creek.
            (2) Riverside bridge project.--The term ``Riverside Bridge 
        Project'' means the project to construct and operate a bridge 
        on and over the covered property.
                                 <all>
```
1 This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see

2 Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please

3 also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other

4 deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the

5 filing date. 

6 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

7 STATE OF NEW MEXICO,

8 Plaintiff-Appellee,

9 v. NO. 31,329

10 RAY VIVIER,

11 Defendant-Appellant.

12 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF VALENCIA COUNTY

13 John W. Pope, District Judge

14 Gary K. King, Attorney General

15 Santa Fe, NM

16 for Appellee

17 Michael R. Demarco

18 McIntosh, NM

19 for Appellant

20 MEMORANDUM OPINION

21 WECHSLER, Judge.

22 Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of

23 proposed disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed,
2

1 and the time for doing so has expired.

2 Affirmed.

3 IT IS SO ORDERED.

4 ______________________________

5 JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge

6 WE CONCUR:

7 _______________________________

8 RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge

9 _______________________________

10 TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge
Fiscal Year 2017 Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies - PUERTO RICO

FY 2017 Title I

LEA ID District Allocation*

4300030 Puerto Rico 408,259,701

4399999 PART D SUBPART 2 0

* Actual amounts received by LEAs will be smaller than shown here due to State-level adjustments to Federal Title I allocations. States adjust

 allocations, for example, to reflect LEA boundary changes or the creation of new LEAs, including charter school LEAs, that are not accounted

 for in the statutory calculations. States also are permitted to reserve, for administration, up to 1 percent of the allocations they would receive

 if $14 billion were appropriated and generally must reserve 7 percent of their allocations for school improvement. These 

 adjustments will reduce the actual amounts available.
### §1151a. Repealed. Pub. L. 94–571, §7(g), Oct. 20, 1976, 90 Stat. 2706

Section, Pub. L. 89–236, §21(e), Oct. 3, 1965, 79 Stat. 921, limited total number of special immigrants under section 1101(a)(27)(A) of this title, less certain exclusions, to 120,000 for fiscal years beginning July 1, 1968, or later.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective on first day of first month which begins more than 60 days after Oct. 20, 1976, see section 10 of Pub. L. 94–571, set out as an Effective Date of 1976 Amendment note under section 1101 of this title.
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

# Administrators

### Recovery Act Resources

Publications on using data, improving teacher quality, and turning around low performing schools.  GO >

### Practice Guides

Recommendations for improving reading and math achievement, reducing behavior problems, using out-of-school time, and more. GO >

### K-12 Policy

Policy documents on accountability, teacher quality, and other elementary/secondary ed. topics. GO >

### Innovations in Education

Choice, supplemental services, charter and magnet schools, and alternative paths to teaching and school leadership. GO >

### What Works Clearinghouse

An independent source of scientific evidence regarding what works in education. GO >

### Evidence-Based Practices

A guide for identifying and implementing education practices supported by rigorous evidence. GO >

### Giving Parents Options

Strategies for informing parents and implementing public school choice and supplemental services under NCLB. GO >

### Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)

The largest digital library of education literature in the world. GO >

## How Do I Find...

          - Student loans, forgiveness
          - College accreditation
          - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
          - FERPA
          - FAFSA
          - 1098, tax forms

More >

## Information About...

          - Transforming Teaching
          - Family and Community Engagement
          - Early Learning

 

|  |
|--|
|  |
|  | Grants & Contracts |  |
|  |
|  | Student Financial Aid |  |
|  |
|  | Research & Statistics |  |
|  |
|  | Policy & Guidance |  |
|  |
|  | Programs |  |
|  |

----

*Our mission*

Student Loans
Repaying LoansDefaulted LoansLoan ForgivenessLoan Servicers

Grants & Programs
Apply for Pell GrantsGrants ForecastApply for a GrantEligibility for Grants

Laws & Guidance
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)FERPACivil RightsNew IDEA Website

Data & Research
Education StatisticsPostsecondary Education DataED Data ExpressNation's Report CardWhat Works Clearinghouse

About Us
Contact UsED OfficesJobsPress ReleasesFAQsRecursos en españolBudget, PerformancePrivacy ProgramSubscribe to E-Mail Updates

----

          - Notices
          - FOIA
          - Privacy Policy
          - Accessibility
          - Security
          - Information quality
          - Inspector General
          - Whitehouse.gov
          - USA.gov
          - Benefits.gov
          - Regulations.gov
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

HSBC BANK USA, NA AS TRUSTEE ON

BEHALF OF ACE SECURITIES CORP HOME

EQUITY LOAN TRUST AND FOR THE 

REGISTERED HOLDERS OF ACE 

SECURITIES CORP HOME EQUITY LOAN 

TRUST, SERIES 2007-ASAP2, ASSET 

BACKED PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES

 Plaintiff,

V.

Karen M. McClafferty

 Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No: 1:11-CV-7882

Judge: John J. Tharp

MOTION FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT OF FORECLOSURE

NOW COMES the Plaintiff, DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, AS 

TRUSTEE FOR THE REGISTERED HOLDER OF EQUIFIRST MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST 

2005-1 ASSET BACKED CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2005-1, by and through its attorney, 

Megan Christine Adams, and moves this Honorable Court for Entry of Judgment of Foreclosure. 

In support thereof, Plaintiff states as follows:

1. On March 11, 2013 the Court entered judgment in favor of the Plaintiff.

2. A Judgment of Foreclosure was never entered and Plaintiff needs that order to proceed 

with the sale.

3. Plaintiff has previously filed affidavits to support a Judgment of Foreclosure. [ECF #20-

1, 21-4]

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully requests that its Motion for Entry of Judgment of 

Foreclosure be Granted, that this Court enter a judgment of foreclosure in favor of Plaintiff, enter 

an award of $178,601.27 as of December 22, 2011, with interest accruing on the unpaid principal 

balance at $25.46 per day, plus attorney’s fees and foreclosure costs of $1,472.00, incurred by 

the Plaintiff as a result of the foreclosure, and all other relief just and proper.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Megan Christine Adams

Megan Christine Adams ARDC#6312221

Potestivo & Associates, P.C.

223 West Jackson Blvd, suite 610

Chicago, IL 60601

(312)263-0003
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA 

Present: Judges Petty, Chafin and Senior Judge Annunziata 

STRANG-HATCHER CORPORATION 27 

 AND SEDGWICK CMS 

 MEMORANDUM OPINION*

v. Record No. 1960-13-1 PER CURIAM 

 FEBRUARY 4, 2014 

SHARON L. SHERMAN 

 FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION 

 (Rachel A. Riordan; Kalbaugh, Pfund & Messersmith, on briefs), for 

appellants. 

 (John H. Klein; Montagna, Klein, Camden, LLP, on brief), for 

appellee. 

 Strang-Hatcher Corporation 27 and Sedgwick CMS appeal the decision of the Workers’ 

Compensation Commission (commission) finding that Sharon L. Sherman’s (claimant) ongoing 

medical conditions were causally related to the compensable injury by accident and that 

claimant’s need for pain management treatment was reasonable, medically necessary, and 

causally related to the accident. We have reviewed the record and the commission’s opinion and 

find that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the 

commission in its final opinion. See Sherman v. Strang-Hatcher Corp., JCN VA02000008167 

(Sept. 12, 2013). We dispense with oral argument and summarily affirm because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court 

and argument would not aid the decisional process. See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27. 

Affirmed.

 *

 Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication. 

UNPUBLISHED
# Gazzetta ufficiale C 330A/7 ot

| | ISSN 1977-0944 |
| --- | --- |
| Gazzetta ufficiale
  dell’Unione europea | C 330A |
| | |
| Edizione in lingua italiana | Comunicazioni e informazioni | 58° anno7 ottobre 2015 |

ISSN 1977-0944

Gazzetta ufficiale

dell’Unione europea

C 330A

Edizione in lingua italiana

Comunicazioni e informazioni

58° anno7 ottobre 2015

---

| Numero d'informazione | Sommario | pagina |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Avvisi |
| | PROCEDIMENTI AMMINISTRATIVI |
| | Ufficio europeo di selezione del personale (EPSO) |
| 2015/C 330A/01 | Avviso di annullamento | 1 |

Numero d'informazione

Sommario

pagina

V   Avvisi

PROCEDIMENTI AMMINISTRATIVI

Ufficio europeo di selezione del personale (EPSO)

2015/C 330A/01

Avviso di annullamento

1

---

| IT | |
| --- | --- |

IT

---

V Avvisi

PROCEDIMENTI AMMINISTRATIVI

Ufficio europeo di selezione del personale (EPSO)

| 7.10.2015 | IT | Gazzetta ufficiale dell’Unione europea | CA 330/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.10.2015

IT

Gazzetta ufficiale dell’Unione europea

CA 330/1

---

AVVISO DI ANNULLAMENTO

(2015/C 330 A/01)

Il bando di concorso generale EPSO/AD/321/15 — Amministratori nel settore dell’audit (AD 5/AD 7) pubblicato nella Gazzetta ufficiale dell’Unione europea
   (1) è annullato.

---

(1)  GU C 316 A del 24.9.15, pag. 1.

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-7628

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

TERRENCE TERRILL BENNEKIN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. 

Bruce H. Hendricks, District Judge. (4:14-cr-00754-BHH-1)

Submitted: April 21, 2021 Decided: May 11, 2021

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Terrence Terrill Bennekin, Appellant Pro Se. Derek Alan Shoemake, Assistant United 

States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Florence, South 

Carolina, for Appellant. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Terrence Terrill Bennekin appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for 

compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i). We have reviewed the record 

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. United States v. Bennekin, No. 4:14-cr-00754-BHH-1 (D.S.C. Oct. 21, 2020). We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED
Case: 1:11-cv-07911 Document #: 42-1 Filed: 01/02/13 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:102

Case: 1:11-cv-07911 Document #: 42-1 Filed: 01/02/13 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:103

Case: 1:11-cv-07911 Document #: 42-1 Filed: 01/02/13 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:104
#### 1901.102 Authority.

The the Broadcasting Board of Governors Acquisition Regulation is prescribed by the Director of the Broadcasting Board of Governors pursuant to the authority of the Reorganization Plan No. 2 of 1977 and the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949, as amended, and other applicable law.
### §228. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act June 7, 1924, ch. 379, 43 Stat. 669, related to aliens who entered prior to July 1, 1924 under quota of 1921, and was omitted as executed.
1813.003 Policy. (NASA supplements paragraph (g)) ( g ) Acquisitions under these simplified acquisition procedures shall be fixed-price, except as provided under the unpriced purchase order method in FAR 13.302-2.
[63 FR 40189, July 28, 1998, as amended at 64 FR 5620, Feb. 4, 1999]