alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In connection with the Annual Report of Sparta Commercial Services, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date therein specified (the “Report”), I, Anthony L. Havens, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  August 15, 2011





/s/ Anthony L. HavensAnthony L. HavensChief Executive Officer
### §1738o. Sale of qualified debt to eligible countries

#### (a) In general

#### (1) Authorization

The President may sell to an eligible country up to 40 percent of such country's qualified debt, only if an amount of the local currency of such country (other than the price paid for the debt) equal to—

(A) not less than 40 percent of the price paid for such debt by such eligible country, or

(B) the difference between the price paid for such debt and the face value of such debt;

whichever is less, is used by such country through an Environmental Fund for eligible activities described in section 1738k of this title.

#### (2) Environmental funds

For purposes of this section, the term "Environmental Fund" means an Environmental Fund established under section 1738g of this title. In the case of Mexico, such fund may be designated as the Good Neighbor Environmental Fund for the Border.

#### (3) Establishment and operation of environmental funds

The President should advise eligible countries on the procedures required to establish and operate the Environmental Funds required to be established under paragraph (1).

#### (b) Terms and conditions

The President shall establish the terms and conditions, including the amount to be paid by the eligible country, under which such country's qualified debt may be sold under this section.

#### (c) Appropriations requirement

The authorities provided by this section may be exercised only in such amounts and to such extent as is provided in advance in appropriations Acts.

#### (d) Certain prohibitions inapplicable

A sale of debt under this section shall not be considered assistance for purposes of any provision of law limiting assistance to a country.

#### (e) Implementation by Facility

A sale of debt authorized under this section shall be accomplished at the direction of the Facility. The Facility shall direct the Commodity Credit Corporation to carry out such sale. The Commodity Credit Corporation shall make an adjustment in its accounts to reflect the sale.

#### (f) Deposit of proceeds

The proceeds from a sale of qualified debt under this section shall be deposited in the account or accounts established by the Commodity Credit Corporation for the repayment of such debt by the eligible country.

#### (g) Debtor consultation

Before any sale of qualified debt may occur under this section, the President should consult with the eligible country's government concerning such sale. The topics addressed in the consultation shall include the amount of qualified debt involved in the transaction and the uses to which funds made available as a result of the sale shall be applied.

(July 10, 1954, ch. 469, title VI, §616, as added Pub. L. 102–532, §2, Oct. 27, 1992, 106 Stat. 3509.)
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-2139
DELICIA ULRICH YANGHAT MBOUMBA, Petitioner, v. MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. Submitted: July 31, 2008 Decided: August 29, 2008 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Peter Nyoh, LAW OFFICES OF PETER NYOH, Silver Spring, Maryland, for Petitioner. Jeffrey S. Bucholtz, Acting Assistant Attorney General, M. Jocelyn Lopez Wright, Assistant Director, Kristin K. Edison, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Delicia Ulrich Yanghat Mboumba, a native and citizen of the Republic of Congo, seeks review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying her untimely motion to reopen removal proceedings. We have reviewed the record and Mboumba’s claims and conclude that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying Mboumba’s motion. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2), (3) (2008). We accordingly deny the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED
-       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2023-08-30T20:56:12-0400
      - Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401
      - Government Publishing Office
      - Government Publishing Office attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by Government Publishing Office
Exhibit 31.1
 
      a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b)
    
    [Intentionally omitted];c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andd)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 December 5, 2008
    /s/ Eugene S. KahnEugene S. KahnChief Executive Officer 33
- ma-harvard-3-comp
- 'Harvard 3' of 'Extra docs March 19'
Motion Granted; Order filed January 26, 2023

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 22

- 00514

- CR

____________ VECENTIE SONTIAGO MORALES , Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from Crim inal Dist ric C our t 1 Tarrant Cou nty, T exas Trial Court Cause No. 1730004R



### ORDER

Appellant’s court

- appointed counsel filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. Appellant filed a motion requesting to review the record and file a pro se brief. S ee And ers v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967); Gainous v. State , 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969). The motion is granted.Accordingly, we hereby direct the Judge of Crim inal Dist ric C our t 1 to

afford appellant an opportunity to view the trial record in accordance with local procedure; that the clerk of that court furnish the record to appellant on or before February 10, 2023 ; that the clerk of that court certify to this court the date on which delivery of the record to appellant is made; and that appell ant file his pro se
brief wit h this court within thirty days of that date.

PER CURIAM

Panel Consists of Justices Wise, Jewell, and Poissant.
### §940h. Bonding requirements

The Secretary shall review the bonding requirements for all programs administered by the Rural Utilities Service under this chapter to ensure that bonds are not required if—

(1) the interests of the Secretary are adequately protected by product warranties; or

(2) the costs or conditions associated with a bond exceed the benefit of the bond.

(May 20, 1936, ch. 432, title III, §318, as added Pub. L. 110–234, title VI, §6109, May 22, 2008, 122 Stat. 1198, and Pub. L. 110–246, §4(a), title VI, §6109, June 18, 2008, 122 Stat. 1664, 1960.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Pub. L. 110–234 and Pub. L. 110–246 enacted identical sections. Pub. L. 110–234 was repealed by section 4(a) of Pub. L. 110–246.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Enactment of this section and repeal of Pub. L. 110–234 by Pub. L. 110–246 effective May 22, 2008, the date of enactment of Pub. L. 110–234, see section 4 of Pub. L. 110–246, set out as a note under section 8701 of this title.
### §390c. Applicability of chapter 10 of title 5

Chapter 10 of title 5 and title XVIII of the Food and Agriculture Act of 1977 (7 U.S.C. 2281 et seq.) shall not apply to a panel or board created solely for the purpose of reviewing applications or proposals submitted under this subchapter.

(Pub. L. 88–74, §5, as added Pub. L. 104–127, title VIII, §884(a), Apr. 4, 1996, 110 Stat. 1179; amended Pub. L. 117–286, §4(a)(22), Dec. 27, 2022, 136 Stat. 4307.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Food and Agriculture Act of 1977, referred to in text, is Pub. L. 95–113, Sept. 29, 1977, 91 Stat. 913. Title XVIII of the Act is classified generally to chapter 55A (§2281 et seq.) of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title of 1977 Amendment note set out under section 1281 of this title and Tables.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 390c, Pub. L. 88–74, §4, July 22, 1963, 77 Stat. 91; Pub. L. 95–113, title XIV, §1416(2), Sept. 29, 1977, 91 Stat. 994; Pub. L. 97–98, title XIV, §1416, Dec. 22, 1981, 95 Stat. 1304; Pub. L. 99–198, title XIV, §1411(d), Dec. 23, 1985, 99 Stat. 1548; Pub. L. 101–624, title XVI, §1601(a), Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 3703, related to appropriations and administrative authority, prior to the general amendment of this subchapter by Pub. L. 104–127.

A prior section 5 of Pub. L. 88–74 was classified to section 390d of this title prior to the general amendment of this subchapter by Pub. L. 104–127.

#### Amendments

2022—Pub. L. 117–286 substituted "chapter 10 of title 5" for "Federal Advisory Committee Act" in section catchline and "Chapter 10 of title 5" for "The Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App.)" in text.
J-S42027- 14

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O. P. 65.37

JAY YUNIK IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Appellant

v. MICHAEL OVERMYER, Appellee No. 135 WDA 2014

Appeal from the Order Entered December 30 , 2013 In the Court of Common Pleas of Crawford County Criminal Division at No.: CP

- 20

- MD -0000534-2013

BEFORE: PANELLA, J., JENKINS, J., and MUSMANNO, J. MEMORANDUM BY JENKINS, J. FILED: AUGUST 25, 2014 Jay Yunik appeals from an order denying his habeas cor pus motion filed against Michael Overmyer, superintendent of the State Correctional Facility at Forest, where Yunik is presently serving his sentence of 54-180 months’ imprisonment for rape. We affirm. Having examined the record, the briefs of the parti es, and the applicable law, and the thorough and well-reasoned op inion of the Honorable John Spataro of the Court of Common Pleas of Crawfor d County, we conclude that Judge Spataro’s opinion accurately disposes of Yunik’s claim that he has “a constitutional right to petition the gov ernment for grievances against it.” Accordingly , we adopt his opinion as our own. See Trial Court Opinion (noting that Yunik was sentenced to imprisonm ent for rape and has filed 4 PCRA petitions, none of which were successful; PCR A subsumes theJ-S24029- 14

- 2 -

claims Yunik wishes to pursue in his habeas corpus peti tion, viz., illegal police interrogation, invalid affidavit of probable cause, concealment of exculpatory evidence, illegal arrest, denial of right to counsel at various stages of case, ineffective assistance of counsel, lack of sub ject matter jurisdiction, unlawfully induced guilty plea, lack of f actual basis for guilty plea; none of Yunik’s claims are timely under the PCR A’s one year statute of limitations; Yunik fails to plead or prove any except ions to the one year statute of limitations; Yunik not prejudiced by the ab sence of a 20 day notice of intent to dismiss his petition under Pa.R.Crim.P. 90 7, since court entertained his motion for reconsideration after deny ing his original habeas corpus motion; Yunik waived objection to the absence of a 20 day notice by failing to include this objection in his statement of ma tters complained of on appeal).

Order affirmed.

Judgment Entered.

Joseph D. Seletyn, Esq. Prothonotary

Date: 8/25/2014
#### The People of the State of New York v. Burton N. Pugach.

Motion for leave to appeal as a poor person denied. Motion for an order compelling Hon. Isidore Dollinger, District Attorney of Bronx County, to furnish to appellant copies of Grand Jury minutes on indictment 1332/59 and all pretrial statements (if any) denied for want of jurisdiction. Motion for *785leave to appeal on two certified questions in connection with judgment of the County Court, Bronx County, rendered on November 9, 1960 denied. Motion for an order directing the production of the appellant before this court to argue his appeal from the judgment of the County Court, Bronx County, rendered on November 9, 1960 denied. Concur — Botein, P. J., Stevens, Eager, Steuer and Bergan, JJ.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION
TRUSTEES OF THE SUBURBAN TEAMSTERS_ )
OF NORTHERN ILLINOIS WELFARE AND )
PENSION FUNDS, »)
)
Plaintiffs, )
) No. 2012 C 1196
v. )
) Judge John Lee
NORTHWEST BUILDING MATERIAL )
OF ILLINOIS, INC., an Illinois corporation and ) Magistrate Judge Cole
KATHERINE M. HENRY, Individually, )
)
Defendants. )

MOTION FOR JUDGMENT IN SUM CERTAIN ON COUNT IT

NOW COME the Plaintiffs, TRUSTEES OF THE SUBURBAN TEAMSTERS OF
NORTHERN ILLINOIS WELFARE AND PENSION FUNDS, by and through their
attorneys, JOHN J. TOOMEY, and ARNOLD AND KADJAN, and, pursuant to FRCP 55,
move for entry of judgment on damages. Liability was ruled upon on May 3, 2012 as to
Count III of the Complaint. In support of their Motion, Plaintiffs state as follows:

1. Pursuant to the May 3, 2012 Minute Order this case was scheduled for
status and prove-up as to damages at a subsequent date.

2. Pursuant to the attached Affidavit of Richard Siebert and the underlying
supporting documents which have been previously reviewed by Defendant’s counsel, the
amounts due on the defaulted Pension Fund installment note is $20,888.40 and defaulted
Welfare Fund installment note is $12,274.10 for a total judgment due of $33,162.50.

3. Pursuant to the terms of the defaulted installment notes “reasonable costs
of collection including reasonable attorneys fees” are to be recovered as part of such
judgment. This is consistent with ERISA 29 U.S.C. 1132(g)(2) allowing for recovery of

attorneys fees and costs.


are:

As supported by the attached Affidavits, the sums due on the Complaint

$20,888.40 Pension installment note
$12,274.10 Welfare installment note
$925.00 Attomeys fees
$475.00 Court costs
$34,562.50

WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs pray for the entry of judgment in a sum certain on Count

Ill of the Complaint against the individual co-maker of the ERISA installment notes:

A.

Awarding judgment in favor of Plaintiffs, TRUSTEES OF THE
SUBURBAN TEAMSTERS OF NORTHERN ILLINOIS WELFARE
AND PENSION FUNDS against the Defendant, KATHERINE M.
HENRY, Individually in the amount of $34,562.50.

This constitutes a final Order of Judgment. There is no just reason to delay
enforcement.

TRUSTEES OF THE SUBURBAN TEAMSTERS
OF NORTHERN ILLINOIS WELFARE AND
PENSION FUNDS

s/John J. Toomey

ARNOLD AND KADJAN

203 N. LaSalle Street, Suite 1650
Chicago, IL 60601

Telephone No.: (312) 236-0415
Facsimile No.: (312) 341-0438
Dated: June 19, 2012
# UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

# OFFICE OF CAREER, TECHNICAL, AND ADULT EDUCATION

TO:Executive Officer

Office of Career, Technical, and Adult Education

FROM:Assistant Secretary

Office of Career, Technical, and Adult Education

## SUBJECT: Delegation of Authority to Certify Fund Availability 

### I.DELEGATION

Under the authority vested in me by a delegation to all Principal Officers from the Chief Financial Officer, EL/GEN/1, certified on December 3, 1998, I hereby delegate to you, and to anyone serving for you in an acting capacity, the authority to certify funds available for administering the functions and responsibilities of the Office of Career, Technical, and Adult Education. This authority is issued pursuant to Title 31 of the U.S. Code, which governs the money and finances of the Department.

Unless otherwise noted in future delegations of authority, amendments to the authority delegated herein are included in the scope of this delegation.

### II.RESERVATIONS

None.

### III. REDELEGATION

This authority may not be redelegated.

### IV. CERTIFICATION AND EFFECTIVE DATE

This delegation is effective upon certification by the Department's Principal Delegations Control Officer.

______/s/____________

**OGC Clearance and Date:  Debbie Friendly; 6/9/2016**

**Certified Date:  6/13/2016**

**Departmental Delegations Control Officer:  Jim Clemmens**

**Control Number:  EV/EV1/96**
### SUBCHAPTER II—SUPPLEMENTAL AGRICULTURAL DISASTER ASSISTANCE
**CERTIFICATION
      OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER**


**AND
      PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





The
      undersigned hereby certify,
      pursuant to, and as required by, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of
      DCAP
      Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30,
      2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that information contained
      in
      such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











Date:  November
                14, 2007
            /s/
Barry
                B. Goldstein
              Barry
                B. Goldstein
              Principal
                Executive Officer/s/
Victor
                Brodsky
              Victor
                Brodsky
              Principal
                Financial Officer
### §385a. Authorization of appropriations

There is authorized to be appropriated each fiscal year necessary appropriations to enable the Secretary of Agriculture to carry on the cooperative experiments contemplated by section 385 of this title.

(Mar. 3, 1927, ch. 367, §2, as added Feb. 4, 1928, ch. 24, 45 Stat. 57.)
#### 1325.204 Evaluating offers of foreign construction material.

The designee authorized to specify a percentage higher than the 6 percent that the contracting officer must add to the cost of any foreign construction material proposed for exception from the requirements of the Buy America Act is set forth in CAM 1301.70.
##### 



Exhibit 31.1
 
      a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andd)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 June 7, 2006
    /s/ Marla L. SchaeferMarla L. SchaeferCo-Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE 
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF FAIR GROUNDS CORPORATION AND FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED 
JULY 31, 1996, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1996
<CASH>                                           3,728
<SECURITIES>                                       227
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,141
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                         81
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 5,893
<PP&E>                                          38,579
<DEPRECIATION>                                  15,300
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  32,527
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,916
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,525
<OTHER-SE>                                      12,215
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    32,527
<SALES>                                          3,901
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,011
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,040
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,097
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 222
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    298
<INCOME-TAX>                                       101
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                197
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       197
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .42
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .42
        

</TABLE>