alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### 1552.203-71 Display of EPA Office of Inspector General Hotline poster.

As prescribed in 1503.1004, insert the following clause in all contracts valued at $1,000,000 or more including all contract options.

# Display of EPA Office of Inspector General Hotline Poster (JUL 2016

(a) For EPA contracts valued at $1,000,000 or more including all contract options, the contractor shall prominently display EPA Office of Inspector General Hotline posters in contractor facilities where the work is performed under the contract.

(b) Office of Inspector General hotline posters may be obtained from the EPA Office of Inspector General, ATTN: OIG Hotline (2443), 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20460, or by accessing the OIG Web site at: *http://www.epa.gov/oig/hotline.html.*

(c) The Contractor need not comply with paragraph (a) of this clause if it has established a mechanism, such as a hotline, by which employees may report suspected instances of improper conduct, and has provided instructions that encourage employees to make such reports.

(End of clause)

[81 FR 31180, May 18, 2016]
----

|  | 1. | The Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2014, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 6, 2015 (“accompanied report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | 2. | The information contained in the accompanied report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of Capital Southwest Corporation. |
|--|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  February 6, 2015 | By:    | /s/ Kelly Tacke         |  |
|------------------------------|--------|-------------------------|--|
|                         |   | Kelly Tacke             |  |
|                         |   | Chief Financial Officer |  |

----
#### 1901.000 Scope of part.

This part describes the method by which the Broadcasting Board of Governors implements and supplements the Federal Acquisition Regulation and contains policies and procedures that implement and supplement Chapter 1 of the Federal Acquisition Regulation (48 CFR).
1733.203-70 Designation of the Interior Board of Contract Appeals to decide OPM appeals. ( a ) The Interior Board of Contract Appeals (IBCA) has been designated by the Director of OPM to consider and determine appeals from decisions of a contracting officer arising under a contract or relating to a contract made by OPM. This delegation governs disputes between OPM and its prime contractors and does not encompass any claim made by a third party beneficiary of, or by a subscriber to, a Federal employee insurance program.
( b ) The address of IBCA is 801 North Quincy Street, Arlington, VA 22203.
( c ) IBCA rules of procedure can be found in 43 CFR part 4.
[51 FR 44296, Dec. 9, 1986, as amended at 68 FR 62022, Oct. 31, 2003]
1804.470-4 Contract clause. ( a ) Insert the clause at 1852.204-76, Security Requirements for Unclassified Information Technology Resources, in *all* solicitations and awards when contract performance requires contractors to— ( 1 ) Have physical or electronic access to NASA's computer systems, networks, or IT infrastructure; or
( 2 ) Use information systems to generate, store, process, or exchange data with NASA or on behalf of NASA, regardless of whether the data resides on a NASA or a contractor's information system.
( b ) Parts of the clause and referenced ADL may be waived by the contracting officer if the contractor's ongoing IT security program meets or exceeds the requirements of NASA Procedural Requirements (NPR) 2810.1 in effect at time of award. The current version of NPR 2810.1 is referenced in the ADL. The contractor shall submit a written waiver request to the Contracting Officer within 30 days of award. The waiver request will be reviewed by the Center IT Security Manager. If approved, the Contractor Officer will notify the contractor, by contract modification, which parts of the clause or provisions of the ADL are waived.
[76 FR 4080, Jan. 24, 2011]
Case: 1:11-cv-07972 Document #: 87 Filed: 05/24/13 Page 1 of 9 PageID #:671
Case: 1:11-cv-07972 Document #: 87 Filed: 05/24/13 Page 2 of 9 PageID #:672
Case: 1:11-cv-07972 Document #: 87 Filed: 05/24/13 Page 3 of 9 PageID #:673
Case: 1:11-cv-07972 Document #: 87 Filed: 05/24/13 Page 4 of 9 PageID #:674
Case: 1:11-cv-07972 Document #: 87 Filed: 05/24/13 Page 5 of 9 PageID #:675
Case: 1:11-cv-07972 Document #: 87 Filed: 05/24/13 Page 6 of 9 PageID #:676
Case: 1:11-cv-07972 Document #: 87 Filed: 05/24/13 Page 7 of 9 PageID #:677
Case: 1:11-cv-07972 Document #: 87 Filed: 05/24/13 Page 8 of 9 PageID #:678
Case: 1:11-cv-07972 Document #: 87 Filed: 05/24/13 Page 9 of 9 PageID #:679
|   | · | The                Covered Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)                or                15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;                and                    |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                     |
|   | · | The                information contained in the Covered Report fairly presents, in all                material respects, the financial condition and results of operations                of                the Company. |

| Date:                March 3, 2006 | /s/ William                F.                Hecht                                   William                F. HechtChairman                andChief                Executive OfficerPPL                Corporation |
|------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsSTS-40 Spacelab Life Sciences 1 (SLS-1): The first dedicated spacelab life sciences missionSuccessful exploration of space depends on the health and well-being of people who travel and work there. For this reason, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) has dedicated several Space Shuttle missions to examine how living and working in space affects the human body. Spacelab Life Sciences 1 (SLS-1) is the first of these missions. The main purpose of the SLS-1 mission is to study the mechanisms, magnitudes, and time courses of certain physiological changes that occur during space flight and to investigate the consequences of the body's adaptation to microgravity and readjustment to gravity upon return to Earth. How does space flight influence the heart and circulatory system, metabolic processes, the muscles and bones, and the cells? If responses to weightlessness are undesirable, how can they be prevented or controlled? Will the human body maintain its physical and chemical equilibrium during months aboard a space station and years-long missions to Mars? When crews return to Earth, what can they expect to experience as their bodies readjust to Earth's gravity? With the SLS-1 experiments, NASA is addressing some of these questions. Various aspects of the SLS-1 are discussed.Document ID19930006634Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateMay 1, 1991Subject CategoryLife Sciences (General)Report/Patent NumberNASA-TM-108034STS-40NAS 1.15:108034Accession Number93N15823Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19930006634.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
### §2270a. Office of Inspector General; transfer of forfeiture funds for law enforcement activities

For fiscal year 1999 and thereafter, funds transferred to the Office of the Inspector General through forfeiture proceedings or from the Department of Justice Assets Forfeiture Fund or the Department of the Treasury Forfeiture Fund, as a participating agency, as an equitable share from the forfeiture of property in investigations in which the Office of the Inspector General participates, or through the granting of a Petition for Remission or Mitigation, shall be deposited to the credit of this account for law enforcement activities authorized under chapter 4 of title 5, to remain available until expended.

(Pub. L. 105–277, div. A, §101(a) [title I], Oct. 21, 1998, 112 Stat. 2681, 2681–3; Pub. L. 117–286, §4(b)(24), Dec. 27, 2022, 136 Stat. 4346.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in the following prior appropriation acts:

Pub. L. 105–86, title I, Nov. 18, 1997, 111 Stat. 2082.

Pub. L. 104–180, title I, Aug. 6, 1996, 110 Stat. 1572.

Pub. L. 104–37, title I, Oct. 21, 1995, 109 Stat. 302.

#### Amendments

2022—Pub. L. 117–286 substituted "chapter 4 of title 5," for "the Inspector General Act of 1978,".
#### Rocell Construction Company, Inc., Respondent, v. City of Rochester, Appellant.

Motion granted and trial of action stayed pending hearing and determination of appeal. If respondent desires to file a brief, this must be done on or before February 2, 1961; otherwise the case will be deemed submitted without brief on the part of the respondent.
1644.170 Policy for FEHB Program subcontracting. ( a ) *General policy.* Carriers must follow commercially reasonable procurement procedures that comply, when required, with the Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR) policies and procedures relating to competition and contract pricing for the acquisition of both commercial and noncommercial items.
( b ) *Consent.* For all experience-rated contracts, carriers will notify the Contracting officer in writing at least 30 days in advance of entering into any subcontract or subcontract modification, or as otherwise specified by the contract, if: the amount of the subcontract or the amount of the subcontract and modification charged to the FEHB Program equals or exceeds $550,000 and is at least 25 percent of the total subcontract's costs. The amount of the dollar charge to the FEHB Program shall be adjusted by the same amount and at the same time as any change to the threshold for application of the Truth in Negotiations Act pursuant to 41 U.S.C. 254b(a)(7). Failure to provide advance notice may result in a Contracting officer's disallowance of subcontract costs or a penalty when considering the performance aspect of the carriers' service charge. ( 1 ) All subcontracts or subcontract modifications that equal or exceed the threshold are subject to audit under FAR 52.215-2 “Audit and Records-Negotiations” if based on cost analysis, and subject to the provisions of 48 CFR 1646.301 and 1652.246-70 “FEHB Inspection” if based on price analysis.
( 2 ) In determining whether the amount chargeable to the FEHB Program contract for a given subcontract or modification equals or exceeds the $550,000 threshold, the following rules apply: ( i ) For initial advance notification, the carrier shall provide the total cost/price for the base year.
( ii ) The carrier shall provide advance notification of any modifications, options, including quantity or service options and option periods, and renewals of “evergreen contracts” that cause the total price to equal or exceed the threshold. OPM's review will be of the modification(s), itself, but documentation for the original subcontract will be required to perform the review.
( iii ) The $550,000 threshold will be adjusted by the same amount and at the same time as any change to the threshold for application of the Truth in Negotiations Act.
[70 FR 31382, June 1, 2005, as amended at 71 FR 3016, Jan. 19, 2006]
#### FRANCIS H. LEGGETT & CO., Respondent, v. LANDWEHR, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

November 13, 1903.)

Action by Francis H. Leggett & Co. against George Landwehr.

No opinion. Motion denied.
**Exhibit 31.2**
**302 CERTIFICATION**
I, Robert P. Capps, certify that:
(1)  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of TeraForce Technology Corporation; (2)  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; (3)  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; (4)  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;  (b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  (c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and
(5)  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 (a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: March 31, 2005     /s/ ROBERT P. CAPPS   Robert P. Capps Chief Financial Officer
Lewis I Williams 4th
                            157 North Gardner Street
                           Los Angeles, CA 90036-2719


01 November 2000



The Board of Directors
Central Capital Venture Corporation
2660 Townsgate Road. Suite 725
Westlake Village, CA 91361



Gentlemen:

Due  to  time  constraints,  other  personal  and  business  commitments,  and a
misunderstanding  with respect to the nature of the required commitment,  please
accept  this  letter as my Letter  of  Resignation  as  President  and/or  Chief
Executive  Officer of Central Capital Venture  Corporation  effective as of this
date.

Thank you for your prompt  attention to and  acceptance  of this action.  Please
feel free to contact me if there are any questions.

/s/ L. I. Williams
Lewis I. Williams IV




                               access2awe@bigfoot.com
                               ----------------------
323-938-3665 @ Telephone                              facsimile @ 323-936-3288














                                       43
1405.502 Authority. ( a ) The CO shall obtain written authorization of the HCA before placing an advertisement in a newspaper to advertise a contracting opportunity.
( b ) Advertisements placed in media other than newspapers do not require advance authorization.
### SUBCHAPTER II—NATIONALITY AT BIRTH
### §1967. Addition to Emergency Credit Revolving Fund of sums from liquidation of loans; authorization of appropriations

(a) All sums received by the Secretary from the liquidation of loans made under the provisions of this subchapter or under the Act of April 6, 1949, as amended, or the Act of August 31, 1954, and from the liquidation of any other assets acquired with money from the Emergency Credit Revolving Fund shall be added to and become a part of such fund.

(b) There are authorized to be appropriated to the Emergency Credit Revolving Fund such additional sums as the Congress shall from time to time determine to be necessary.

(Pub. L. 87–128, title III, §327, Aug. 8, 1961, 75 Stat. 312.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Act of April 6, 1949, as amended, referred to in subsec. (a), is act Apr. 6, 1949, ch. 49, 63 Stat. 43, which was classified to sections 1148a–1 to 1148a–3 of Title 12, Banks and Banking, was repealed by section 341(a) of Pub. L. 87–128, and is covered by this chapter.

Act of August 31, 1954, referred to in subsec. (a), is act Aug. 31, 1954, ch. 1145, 68 Stat. 999, which was classified as a note under section 1148a–1 of Title 12, was repealed by section 341(a) of Pub. L. 87–128, and is covered by this chapter.

#### Abolition of Emergency Credit Revolving Fund

The Emergency Credit Revolving Fund, referred to in this section and in section 1966 of this title, was abolished and its assets and liabilities transferred to the Agricultural Credit Insurance Fund by section 1929 of this title.
Exhibit 32.1

**Certification of****Chairman of the Board****and****President**

**Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code**

I, Gary L. Martin, Chairman of the Board and President of Capital Southwest Corporation, certify that, to my knowledge:

| 1. |   |   | the Form 10-Q, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 5, 2009 (“accompanied report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |   |   |
|----|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|    |        |        |                                                                                                                                                                                                                               |        |        |
| 2. |   |   | the information contained in the accompanied report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of Capital Southwest Corporation.                                    |   |   |

| Date: November 5, 2009 |   |  By: |  /s/ Gary L. Martin                                  |   |   |
|------------------------|--------|-----------|-----------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|                        |   |      | Gary L. Martin, Chairman of the Board and President  |   |
19.504 Orders under multiple-award contracts. ( a ) *General.* In accordance with section 1331 of the Small Business Jobs Act of 2010 (15 U.S.C. 644(r)(2)), contracting officers may, at their discretion, set aside orders placed under multiple-award contracts for any of the small business concerns identified in 19.000(a)(3). ( 1 ) The contracting officer shall state in the solicitation and resulting contract whether order set-asides will be discretionary or mandatory when the conditions in 19.502-2 are met at the time of order set-aside, and the specific program eligibility requirements, as applicable, are also then met.
( 2 ) When setting aside an order at or below the simplified acquisition threshold, the contracting officer may set aside the order for any of the small business concerns identified in 19.000(a)(3).
( 3 ) When setting aside an order above the simplified acquisition threshold, the contracting officer shall first consider setting aside the order for the small business socioeconomic contracting programs (*i.e.,* 8(a), HUBZone, service-disabled veteran-owned small business, and women-owned small business) before considering a small business set-aside.
( 4 ) The contracting officer shall comply with the specific program eligibility requirements identified in this part in addition to the ordering procedures for a multiple-award contract (for orders placed under the Federal Supply Schedules Program, see 8.405-5; for orders placed under all other multiple-award contracts, see 16.505).
( b ) *Orders under set-aside contracts-* ( 1 ) *Orders under total set-aside contracts.* Under a total small business set-aside, contracting officers may at their discretion set aside orders for any of the small business socioeconomic concerns identified in 19.000(a)(3) provided that the requirements at paragraph (a) of this section, 19.502-2(b), and the specific program eligibility requirements are met.
( 2 ) Orders under partial set-aside contracts . ( i ) Only small business concerns awarded contracts for the portion(s) that were set aside under the solicitation for the multiple-award contract may compete for orders issued under those portion(s).
( ii ) Small business awardees may compete against other than small business awardees for an order issued under the portion of the multiple-award contract that was not set aside, if the small business received a contract award for the non-set-aside portion.
( c ) *Orders under reserves.* ( 1 ) The contracting officer may— ( i ) Set aside orders for any of the small business concerns identified in 19.000(a)(3) when there are two or more contract awards for that type of small business concern; or
( ii ) Issue orders directly to one small business concern for work that it can perform when there is only one contract award to any one type of small business concern identified in 19.000(a)(3).
( 2 ) Small business awardees may compete against other than small business awardees for an order that is not set aside if the small business received a contract award for the supplies or services being ordered.
[85 FR 11762, Feb. 27, 2020, as amended 88 FR 9738, Feb. 14, 2023]