alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §6612. Definitions

As used in this subchapter:

(1) The term "action team" means a rural natural resources and economic diversification action team established by the Secretary pursuant to section 6613(b) of this title.

(2) The term "economically disadvantaged" means economic hardship due to the loss of jobs or income (labor or proprietor) derived from forestry, the wood products industry, or related commercial enterprises such as recreation and tourism in the national forest.

(3) The term "rural community" means—

(A) any town, township, municipality, or other similar unit of general purpose local government, or any area represented by a not-for-profit corporation or institution organized under State or Federal law to promote broad based economic development, or unit of general purpose local government, as approved by the Secretary, that has a population of not more than 10,000 individuals, is located within a county in which at least 15 percent of the total primary and secondary labor and proprietor income is derived from forestry, wood products, and forest-related industries such as recreation, forage production, and tourism and that is located within the boundary, or within 100 miles of the boundary, of a national forest; or

(B) any county that is not contained within a Metropolitan Statistical Area as defined by the United States Office of Management and Budget, in which at least 15 percent of the total primary and secondary labor and proprietor income is derived from forestry, wood products, and forest-related industries such as recreation, forage production, and tourism and that is located within the boundary, or within 100 miles of the boundary, of a national forest.

(4) The term "Secretary" means the Secretary of Agriculture.

(Pub. L. 101–624, title XXIII, §2374, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 4046; Pub. L. 103–115, Oct. 26, 1993, 107 Stat. 1117; Pub. L. 106–113, div. B, §1000(a)(3) [title III, §345(b)], Nov. 29, 1999, 113 Stat. 1535, 1501A–203.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1999—Par. (1). Pub. L. 106–113 substituted "natural resources" for "forestry".

1993—Par. (3). Pub. L. 103–115 amended par. (3) generally. Prior to amendment, par. (3) read as follows: "The term 'rural community' means—

"(A) any town, township, municipality, or other similar unit of general purpose local government having a population of not more than 10,000 individuals (according to the latest decennial census) that is located in a county where at least 15 percent of the total primary and secondary labor and proprietor income is derived from forestry, wood products, and forest-related industries such as recreation and tourism; or

"(B) any county or similar unit of general purpose local government having a population of not more than 22,550 individuals (according to the latest decennial census) in which at least 15 percent of the total primary and secondary labor and proprietor income is derived from forestry, wood products, and forest-related industries such as recreation and tourism,

that is located within the boundary, or within 100 miles of the boundary, of a national forest."
### §9038. Special competitive provisions for extra long staple cotton

#### (a) Competitiveness program

Notwithstanding any other provision of law, during the period beginning on February 7, 2014, through July 31, 2024, the Secretary shall carry out a program—

(1) to maintain and expand the domestic use of extra long staple cotton produced in the United States;

(2) to increase exports of extra long staple cotton produced in the United States; and

(3) to ensure that extra long staple cotton produced in the United States remains competitive in world markets.

#### (b) Payments under program; trigger

Under the program, the Secretary shall make payments available under this section whenever—

(1) for a consecutive 4-week period, the world market price for the lowest priced competing growth of extra long staple cotton (adjusted to United States quality and location and for other factors affecting the competitiveness of such cotton), as determined by the Secretary, is below the prevailing United States price for a competing growth of extra long staple cotton; and

(2) the lowest priced competing growth of extra long staple cotton (adjusted to United States quality and location and for other factors affecting the competitiveness of such cotton), as determined by the Secretary, is less than 113 percent of the loan rate for extra long staple cotton.

#### (c) Eligible recipients

The Secretary shall make payments available under this section to domestic users of extra long staple cotton produced in the United States and exporters of extra long staple cotton produced in the United States that enter into an agreement with the Commodity Credit Corporation to participate in the program under this section.

#### (d) Payment amount

Payments under this section shall be based on the amount of the difference in the prices referred to in subsection (b)(1) during the fourth week of the consecutive 4-week period multiplied by the amount of documented purchases by domestic users and sales for export by exporters made in the week following such a consecutive 4-week period.

(Pub. L. 113–79, title I, §1208, Feb. 7, 2014, 128 Stat. 684; Pub. L. 115–334, title I, §1204, Dec. 20, 2018, 132 Stat. 4510.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 115–334, §1204(a), substituted "2024" for "2019" in introductory provisions.

Subsec. (b)(2). Pub. L. 115–334, §1204(b), substituted "113 percent" for "134 percent".
Appeal No. 74-208.

#### Robert Wood *v. V.*J. Paolino *et al.*

*Francis R. Mazzeo,*for plaintiff. *John R. Cosentino, Armando O. Monaco, II,*for defendants.

Motion of defendant V. J. Paolino to affirm the order entered in the Superior Court on June 25, 1974 is denied.

Paolino, J. not participating.
#### William G. Creason, Appellant, v. Lorraine B. Jaeger et al., Defendants, and Sidney Nodland, Respondent.

Motion by defendant-respondent Nodland to dismiss plaintiff’s appeal (1) from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered on February 21, 1962, on the ground that notice of appeal therefrom was not timely served; and (2) from an order of the same court, entered on April 4, 1962, denying reargument, on the ground that such order is not appealable. Motion granted, without costs, and appeals from both orders dismissed. Plaintiff’s notice of appeal from the order of February 21, 1962 was belatedly served (Civ. Prac. Act, § 612). Plaintiff’s notice of appeal from the order of April 4, 1962 is likewise ineffective, since no appeal lies from an order denying a motion for reargument *(McNees*v. *Scholoff,*2 A D 2d 820, 821; *Schreck*v. *Schreck,*283 App. Div. 967; *Torchio*v. *Nacirema Operating Co.,*283 App. Div. 675; *Winston*v. *Bendix Home Appliances,*281 App. Div. 1047, 1048). Beldock, P. J., Brennan, Hill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
#### 1252.239-77 Data Jurisdiction.

As prescribed in 1239.7204(b), insert a clause substantially as follows:

# Data Jurisdiction (NOV 2022)

The Contractor shall identify all data centers in which the data at rest or data backup will reside, including primary and replicated storage. The Contractor shall ensure that all data centers not physically located on DOT premises reside within the United States, the District of Columbia, and all territories and possessions of the United States, unless otherwise authorized by the DOT CIO. The Contractor shall provide a Wide Area Network (WAN), with a minimum of ___ [*Contracting Officer fill-in: Insert specific number*] data center facilities at ___ [*Contracting Officer fill-in number]* different geographic locations with at least ___ [*Contracting Officer fill-in number*] internet Exchange Point (IXP) for each price offering. The Contractor shall provide internet bandwidth at the minimum of ___ [*Contracting Officer fill-in applicable gigabytes*] GB.

(End of clause)
1.108 FAR conventions. The following conventions provide guidance for interpreting the FAR: ( a ) *Words and terms.* Definitions in Part 2 apply to the entire regulation unless specifically defined in another part, subpart, section, provision, or clause. Words or terms defined in a specific part, subpart, section, provision, or clause have that meaning when used in that part, subpart, section, provision, or clause. Undefined words retain their common dictionary meaning.
( b ) *Delegation of authority.* Each authority is delegable unless specifically stated otherwise (see 1.102-5(b)).
( c ) *Dollar thresholds.* Unless otherwise specified, a specific dollar threshold for the purpose of applicability is the final anticipated dollar value of the action, including the dollar value of all options. If the action establishes a maximum quantity of supplies or services to be acquired or establishes a ceiling price or establishes the final price to be based on future events, the final anticipated dollar value must be the highest final priced alternative to the Government, including the dollar value of all options.
( d ) *Application of FAR changes to solicitations and contracts.* Unless otherwise specified— ( 1 ) FAR changes apply to solicitations issued on or after the effective date of the change;
( 2 ) Contracting officers may, at their discretion, include the FAR changes in solicitations issued before the effective date, provided award of the resulting contract(s) occurs on or after the effective date; and
( 3 ) Contracting officers may, at their discretion, include the changes in any existing contract with appropriate consideration.
( e ) *Citations.* When the FAR cites a statute, Executive order, Office of Management and Budget circular, Office of Federal Procurement Policy policy letter, or relevant portion of the Code of Federal Regulations, the citation includes all applicable amendments, unless otherwise stated.
( f ) *Imperative sentences.* When an imperative sentence directs action, the contracting officer is responsible for the action, unless another party is expressly cited.
[65 FR 36015, June 6, 2000, as amended at 88 FR 53751, Aug. 8, 2023]
Case: 1:11-cv-08987 Document #: 94-2 Filed: 10/01/14 Page 1 of 8 PageID #:1097

Case: 1:11-cv-08987 Document #: 94-2 Filed: 10/01/14 Page 2 of 8 PageID #:1098

Case: 1:11-cv-08987 Document #: 94-2 Filed: 10/01/14 Page 3 of 8 PageID #:1099

Case: 1:11-cv-08987 Document #: 94-2 Filed: 10/01/14 Page 4 of 8 PageID #:1100

Case: 1:11-cv-08987 Document #: 94-2 Filed: 10/01/14 Page 5 of 8 PageID #:1101

Case: 1:11-cv-08987 Document #: 94-2 Filed: 10/01/14 Page 6 of 8 PageID #:1102

Case: 1:11-cv-08987 Document #: 94-2 Filed: 10/01/14 Page 7 of 8 PageID #:1103

Case: 1:11-cv-08987 Document #: 94-2 Filed: 10/01/14 Page 8 of 8 PageID #:1104
EXHIBIT 99.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Venture Catalyst Incorporated (the Company) on Form
10-KSB for the year ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Kevin P. McIntosh, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.





By:

/s/    KEVIN P.
MCINTOSHKevin P. McIntoshSenior Vice President and ChiefFinancial Officer


Dated:    September 30, 2002










1
PO Box 4023

184 South Main Street Washington, PA 15301 

## CENTER FOR COALFIELD 

# JUSTtCE

■ tiranittn:1 educating empowenng P) 724.229.3550 F) 724.229.3551 www.coalfieldjustice.org info@coalfieldjustice.org

Hello, my name is Jaclyn Clifford and I am a student at the University Pittsburgh school of law and I am a legal intern for the Center for Coalfield Justice. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the US EPA's Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants and the Carbon Pollution Standard for Modified Sources. The EPA's proposed Clean Power Plan implementation is vital for both the environment and the economy of Pennsylvania. The Center for Coalfield Justice supports the Clean Power Plan to increase the use of renewable energy sources. Our nation prides itself on being innovators and trailblazers, so why have we become so complacent with our energy standards? Even though coal extraction has proven time and time again to be an environmentally and economically destructive industry we continue to rely on the status quo. We now have the chance to start investing in more reliable and safer renewable energy sources such as wind, solar, and hydro. Washington and Greene County are of the top producers of coal in the country, but are among some of the poorest communities in Pennsylvania. Most citizens are dependent upon jobs in the coal industry to provide for their families. These jobs are dangerous and not sustainable. These areas lack job diversity that would allow for economic growth. The responsible development of renewable energy resources supports local economies, creates jobs, and niox America and Pennsylvania toward a cleaner. more reliable energy future. Residents of both Greene and Washington County have been paying the economic and environmental costs of the coal industry far too long. This Rule will finally allow Pennsylvania to loosen the grip of the coal industry and allow for communities in Washington and Greene County to diversify their economy and start working towards a coal free generation.

Thanks

!acivn Liirtoro
184 S Main Street
PO BOX 4023 Washington, PA 15301

Justice for Coalfield Citizens
### §3812. Authority in addition to other laws; effect on State laws

The authority conferred by this chapter shall be in addition to authority conferred by other statutes. Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to repeal or supersede any State law prohibiting the feeding of garbage to swine or to prohibit any State from enforcing requirements relating to the treatment of garbage to be fed to swine or the feeding thereof which are more stringent than those under this chapter or the regulations hereunder.

(Pub. L. 96–468, §12, formerly §13, Oct. 17, 1980, 94 Stat. 2233; renumbered §12, Pub. L. 104–127, title IX, §914(b)(2), Apr. 4, 1996, 110 Stat. 1186.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 12 of Pub. L. 96–468 was renumbered section 11 and is classified to section 3811 of this title.
#### Dairymen’s League Cooperative Association, Inc., Respondent, v. F. A. Conrad, Individually and as President of Milk Drivers and Dairy Employees Union Local No. 338, et al., Appellants.

Order unanimously affirmed, with $25 costs and disbursements. (Appeal by defendants from order of Onondaga Special Term (entered in Oneida County) granting plain tiff’s motion for a temporary injunction and denying defendants’ cross motion to dismiss the complaint.) Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Halpern, McClusky and Henry, JJ. [33 Misc 2d 914.]
#### In the Matter of Frederick A. Collins, Jr., v. Lucia B. Collins.

Motion to dismiss appeal granted, with $10 costs, unless the respondent-respondent-appellant procures the record on appeal and appellant’s points to be served and filed on or before September 11, 1962, with notice of argument for the October 1962 Term of this court, said appeal to be argued or submitted when reached. Concur — Botein, P. J., Rabin, McNally, Stevens and Steuer, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 817 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 817

    To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the age 
  requirement with respect to eligibility for qualified ABLE programs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 4, 2017

 Mr. Casey (for himself, Mr. Burr, and Mr. Van Hollen) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                                Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the age 
  requirement with respect to eligibility for qualified ABLE programs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``ABLE Age Adjustment Act''.

SEC. 2. MODIFICATION OF AGE REQUIREMENT FOR QUALIFIED ABLE PROGRAMS.

    (a) In General.--Section 529A(e) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 is amended by striking ``age 26'' each place it appears in 
paragraphs (1)(A) and (2)(A)(i)(II) and inserting ``age 46''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
### §§5881 to 5885. Repealed. Pub. L. 104–127, title VIII, §862(a), Apr. 4, 1996, 110 Stat. 1174

Section 5881, Pub. L. 101–624, title XVI, §1650, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 3754, related to plant and animal pest and disease control program.

Section 5882, Pub. L. 101–624, title XVI, §1651, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 3754, related to pest and disease control data base and pesticide resistance monitoring.

Section 5883, Pub. L. 101–624, title XVI, §1652, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 3755; Pub. L. 102–237, title IV, §407(8), Dec. 13, 1991, 105 Stat. 1865, related to research on control and eradication of exotic pests.

Section 5884, Pub. L. 101–624, title XVI, §1653, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 3755, provided for study of biology and behavior of chinch bugs.

Section 5885, Pub. L. 101–624, title XVI, §1654, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 3756, authorized appropriations for plant, pest, and disease control program.
### U.S. Geological Survey-Missouri Geological Survey symposium; Mineral-resource potential of the Midcontinent; program and abstracts, St. Louis, Missouri, April 11-12, 1989

By: Martin B. Goldhaber**

Edited by: Walden P. Pratt

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/cir1043

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Superseded Publications:
                                        U.S. Geological Survey - Missouri Geological Survey symposium; mineral-resource potential of the Midcontinent; program and abstracts(1989)                                    

- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1533 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1533

Reaffirming United States support of the State of Israel one year after 
                     the October 7, 2023, attacks.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 4, 2024

 Mr. Fry (for himself, Mr. Issa, Mr. Biggs, Mrs. Houchin, Mr. Duarte, 
 Mrs. Miller of West Virginia, Mr. Bishop of North Carolina, Mr. Kelly 
  of Pennsylvania, Mr. Moran, Mr. Buchanan, Mr. Guthrie, Mr. Nunn of 
 Iowa, Mr. Guest, Mr. Crenshaw, and Mr. Carl) submitted the following 
   resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Reaffirming United States support of the State of Israel one year after 
                     the October 7, 2023, attacks.

    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) reaffirms the United States strong and continued 
        support of Israel one year following the October 7, 2023, 
        surprise attacks on Israel;
            (2) condemns Hamas' brutal war against Israel; and
            (3) calls on Hamas to immediately cease these violent 
        attacks and safely release all living hostages and return the 
        bodies of deceased hostages.
                                 <all>
```
### SUBCHAPTER VI—PERMANENT PRICE SUPPORT AUTHORITY
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 4.2

Eastern Division

Bubble Gum Productions, LLC

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:12−cv−00595

Honorable Joan H. Lefkow

John Does 1−37

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Tuesday, February 14, 2012:

 MINUTE entry before Honorable Joan H. Lefkow:Plaintiff's motion for leave to

take discovery prior to the Rule 26(f) conference [5] is stricken for want of prosecution.

No one appeared in court when motion [5] was called on 2/14/2012. Mailed notice(mad, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:12-cv-00595 Document #: 11 Filed: 02/14/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:53