alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Ida Watson, as Administratrix of the Estate of Bobby E. Watson, Deceased, et al., Respondents, v. Socony Mobil Oil Company, Inc., et al., Appellants.

In an action to recover damages for wrongful death, etc. (see *Watson*v. *Socony Mobil Oil Co.,*19 A D 2d 560), the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated May 6, 1960, which denied their motion to amend the stenographic minutes of the trial of the action so as to include certain comments of the Trial Justice made to the jurors upon the conclusion of the trial. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. The record discloses that the comments in question were made by the Trial Justice to the jurors after they had rendered their verdict and had been polled and after they had been discharged as jurors in the pending action; and that such comments, made at the conclusion of the trial, were not intended to be a part of the trial. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Hill and Rabin, JJ., concur.
§ 767.18 Notice of Violation and Assessment (NOVA). ( a ) A NOVA will be issued by the Director of the NHHC and served in person or by registered, certified, return receipt requested, or express mail, or by commercial express package service, upon the respondent, or in the case of a vessel respondent, the owner of the vessel. A copy of the NOVA will be similarly served upon the permit holder, if the holder is not the respondent. The NOVA will contain: ( 1 ) A concise statement of the facts believed to show a violation;
( 2 ) A specific reference to the provision(s) of the SMCA, regulation, or permit violated;
( 3 ) The findings and conclusions upon which the Director of the NHHC bases the assessment;
( 4 ) The amount of civil penalty, enforcement costs and/or liability for damages assessed; and
( 5 ) An advisement of the respondent's rights upon receipt of the NOVA, including a citation to the regulations governing the proceedings.
( b ) The NOVA may also contain a proposal for compromise or settlement of the case.
( c ) Prior to assessing a civil penalty or liability for damages, the Director of the NHHC will take into account information available to the Agency concerning any factor to be considered under the SMCA and any other information required by law or in the interests of justice. The respondent will have the opportunity to review information considered and present information, in writing, to the Director of the NHHC. At the discretion of the Director of the NHHC, a respondent will be allowed to present information in person.
#### Elizabeth Page *v.*Welfare Commissioner

*Norman J. Johnson,*in support of the petition.

*Edward F. Reynolds, Jr.,*assistant attorney general, in opposition.

Submitted January 17

decided January 29, 1975

The plaintiff’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Division of the Conrt of Common Pleas is granted.
### IN THE UNI TED STAT ES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCU IT

N o
. 0 9

- 1 0 7 9 7 S u m m a r y C a l e n d a r

U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A , P l a i n t i f f

- A p p e l l e e

v
. E L I Z Z G A R C I A , D e f e n d a n t

- A p p e l l a n t

A p p e a l f

r o m t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s D i s t r i c t C o u r t f o r t h e N o r t h e r n D i s t r i c t o f T e x a s U S D C N o
. 4 : 0 9

- C R

- 3 0

- 1

B e f o r e W I E N E R , P R A D O , a n d O W E N , C i r c u i t J u d g e s
. P E R C U R I A M : *
D e f e n d a n t

- A p p e l l a n t E l i z z G a r c i a a p p e a l s t h e s e n t e n c e i m p o s e d f o l l o w i n g h e r g u i l t y - p l e a c o n v i c t i o n f o r p o s s e s s i o n o f s t o l e n m a i l m a t t e r , i n v i o l a t i o n o f 1 8 U

. S

. C

. § 1 7 0 8

. G a r c i a a s s e r t s t h a t t h e d i s t r i c t c o u r t e r r e d w h e n i t o r d e r e d h e r f e d e r a l s e n t e n c e t o r u n c o n s e c u t i v e l y t o a n o t

- y e t

- i m p o s e d s t a t e s e n t e n c e
. T h e
g o v e r n m e n t f

i l e d m o t i o n s t o s u p p l e m e n t t h e r e c o r d o n a p p e a l a n d f o r s u m m a r y

a f f i r m a n c e
. W e G R A N T t h e m o t i o n t o s u p p l e m e n t t h e r e c o r d o n a p p e a l

. B e c a u s e G a r c i a ’ s c h a l l e n g e i s f o r e c l o s e d b y o u r p r i o r p r e c e d e n t , w e G R A N T t h e

m o t i o n f

o r s u m m a r y a f

f i r m a n c e , a n d w e A F F I R M t h e d i s t r i c t c o u r t ’ s j u d g m e n t

. U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s

F i ft h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D Novembe r 8, 2 010 Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Purs uant to 5 T H C I R

. R. 47.5 , the cour t has d ete rm ined t hat this op inion sho uld not * be publ ish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t for th in 5 T H C I R

. R. 47.5 .4. Case: 09-10797 Document: 00511287186 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/08/2010N o
. 0 9

- 1 0 7 9 7

S e e U n i t e d S t a t e s v
. B r o w n , 9 2 0 F

. 2 d 1 2 1 2 ( 5 t h C i r
. 1 9 9 1 ) , a b r o g a t e d o n o t h e r g r o u n d s b y U n i t e d S t a t e s v
. C a n d i a , 4 5 4 F

. 3 d 4 6 8 , 4 7 2

- 7 3 ( 5 t h C i r
. 2 0 0 6 )

.

2 Case: 09-10797 Document: 00511287186 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/08/2010
#### § 845.2 Statutory authority.

10 U.S.C. 1037 provides authority for employment of counsel, and payment of counsel fees, court costs, bail, and other expenses incident to representation of persons subject to the Uniform Code of Military Justice before foreign tribunals. For personnel not subject to the Uniform Code of Military Justice, funds for similar expenses may be made available in cases of exceptional interest to the service concerned, upon prior application through the Judge Advocate General of the service concerned, to the appropriate service secretary.
#### State of Connecticut *v.*Geoffrey Kyles

*Thomas F. Brown,*in support of the motion.

Submitted September 19

decided October *2,*1974

The defendant’s motion in the appeal from the Superior Court in New Haven County for a review by this court of the order by the trial court setting the amount of his appeal bond is granted and the relief sought therein is denied.
### §7509. Relationship to other programs

(a) Section 2013(b) of this title shall not apply with respect to the distribution of commodities under this chapter.

(b) Except as otherwise provided in section 7504 of this title, none of the commodities distributed under this chapter shall be sold or otherwise disposed of in commercial channels in any form.

(Pub. L. 98–8, title II, §205, Mar. 24, 1983, 97 Stat. 36; Pub. L. 98–92, §2(7), Sept. 2, 1983, 97 Stat. 611; Pub. L. 110–234, title I, §4002(b)(1)(B), (2)(I), May 22, 2008, 122 Stat. 1096, 1097; Pub. L. 110–246, §4(a), title IV, §4002(b)(1)(B), (2)(I), June 18, 2008, 122 Stat. 1664, 1857, 1858.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Pub. L. 110–234 and Pub. L. 110–246 made identical amendments to this section. The amendments by Pub. L. 110–234 were repealed by section 4(a) of Pub. L. 110–246.

#### Amendments

2008—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 110–246, §4002(b)(1)(B), (2)(I), made technical amendment to reference in original act which appears in text as reference to section 2013(b) of this title.

1983—Pub. L. 98–92 substituted "Relationship to other programs" for "Relationships to food stamps" in section catchline, designated existing provisions as subsec. (a), and added subsec. (b).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2008 Amendment

Amendment of this section and repeal of Pub. L. 110–234 by Pub. L. 110–246 effective May 22, 2008, the date of enactment of Pub. L. 110–234, except as otherwise provided, see section 4 of Pub. L. 110–246, set out as an Effective Date note under section 8701 of this title.

Amendment by section 4002(b)(1)(B), (2)(I) of Pub. L. 110–246 effective Oct. 1, 2008, see section 4407 of Pub. L. 110–246, set out as a note under section 1161 of Title 2, The Congress.

#### Effective Date of 1983 Amendment

Pub. L. 98–92, §2, Sept. 2, 1983, 97 Stat. 608, provided in part that the amendment made by section 2 is effective Oct. 1, 1983.
#### 1324.203 Policy.

DOC's implementation of the Freedom of Information Act is described in 15 CFR part 4 and DAO 205-14.
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23
 
              CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
 
     We have issued our report dated August 12, 1997, accompanying the financial
statements included in the Annual Report of Inland Casino Corporation on Form
10-KSB for the year ended June 30, 1997. We hereby consent to the incorporation
by reference of said report in the Registration Statements of Inland Casino
Corporation of Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-19743, effective January 14, 1997,
333-19745, effective January 14, 1997, and 333-19747, effective January 14,
1997).
 
/s/  GRANT THORNTON LLP
 
Los Angeles, California
September 29, 1997
#### In the Matter of Samuel Greason, Petitioner, v. Irving E. Dickman, Respondent.

This is a proceeding to discipline respondent, an attorney, for professional misconduct. The petition charges: (1) that respondent failed to turn over to his clients and converted to his own use moneys received in settlement of various actions and in the course of negotiations with respect to real estate and other transactions; (2) that he forged the indorsement of payees’ names on checks received by him as attorney; (3) that he used escrow and trust funds for his personal use; (4) that he commingled such funds; (5) that he committed larceny with respect to funds of his clients and funds of others entrusted to his care; and (6) that from time to time he issued checks which were dishonored. These charges are based upon evidence adduced before the Hon. Prank A. Gullotta, the Justice presiding at the Judicial Inquiry on Professional Conduct before the Additional Special Term of the Supreme Court, Nassau County. Although the petition and order to show cause were duly served upon respondent, he failed to appear in this proceeding or to answer the petition on the return day. Thereafter, and on May 25, 1964, respondent submitted a written verified answer in which he in effect has conceded the truth of some of the charges made against him. Accordingly, the respondent is disbarred and his name is directed to be struck from the roll of attorneys and counselors at law. Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
# Materials Not Included in **Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket**

Docket Number: FAA- 2011 - 1224 Directorate Identifier: 2011NM175AD

Hamilton - Sundstrand ERPS10G -24 - 1 --- 2/9/11

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket 

### MA **Y BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate Rules Docket 1601 Lind Ave. SW., Renton, WA 98057 425.227.1221 **DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Form Date: 03/05/2008
-84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72 -70

 34

 36

 38

 40

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★

▲ ▲

▲

▲ 500

 1000

 1500

 500

18 12 06 00

05/31

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 31 May 06

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 39.03 N 77.49 W Meters AGL
#### In the Matter of the Board of Cooperative Educational Services, Second Supervisory District, Westchester County, Appellant, v. Eugene F. Buckley, as Assessor of the Town of Rye, et al., Respondents.

In a proceeding pursuant to article 7 of the Real Property Tax Law, to review an assessment of real property, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated February 21, 1964, which dis-" missed the petition. Judgment affirmed, without costs. In our opinion, a board of co-operative educational services organized pursuant to section 1958 of the Education Law has no authority to purchase real property *(Matter of Board of Educ.*v. *Board of Coop. Educ. Sen.,*41 Misc 2d 699) and therefore the real property purchased by it is not exempt from taxation under section 420 of the Real Property Tax Law (cf. *Matter of Board of Educ.*v. *Baker,*241 App. Div. 574, affd. 266 N. Y. 636). Ughetta, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld, Brennan, Hill and Rabin, JJ., concur.
#### In the Matter of Jewish Memorial Hospital et al., Appellants, v Robert P. Whalen et al., Respondents.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on August 28, 1978, unanimously affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. Appellants are granted leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals. No opinion. Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Birns, Lane, Sandler and Sullivan, JJ.
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

About EDOVERVIEW
|  | **MS Word (371 KB)** |
|--|----------------------|

STRATEGIC PRIORITIES 

OCR has aligned its resources with the goals and objectives in President Bush’s *No Child Left Behind Act* related to OCR’s mission.  This section focuses on OCR activities in support of *NCLB* and other high priority activities.

|                                           |
|-------------------------------------------|
|   7 | 8 | 9 | TOC | Printable viewShare this page |
|                                           |

## How Do I Find...

          - Student loans, forgiveness
          - College accreditation
          - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
          - FERPA
          - FAFSA
          - 1098, tax forms

More >

## Information About...

          - Transforming Teaching
          - Family and Community Engagement
          - Early Learning

 

|  |
|--|
|  |
|  | Mission |  |
|  |
|  | Priorities |  |
|  |
|  | Welcome to ED.gov |  |
|  |

----

*Our mission*

Student Loans
Repaying LoansDefaulted LoansLoan ForgivenessLoan Servicers

Grants & Programs
Apply for Pell GrantsGrants ForecastApply for a GrantEligibility for Grants

Laws & Guidance
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)FERPACivil RightsNew IDEA Website

Data & Research
Education StatisticsPostsecondary Education DataED Data ExpressNation's Report CardWhat Works Clearinghouse

About Us
Contact UsED OfficesJobsPress ReleasesFAQsRecursos en españolBudget, PerformancePrivacy ProgramSubscribe to E-Mail Updates

----

          - Notices
          - FOIA
          - Privacy Policy
          - Accessibility
          - Security
          - Information quality
          - Inspector General
          - Whitehouse.gov
          - USA.gov
          - Benefits.gov
          - Regulations.gov
§ 66.4 Policy. It is DoD policy to: ( a ) Use common entrance qualification standards for enlistment, appointment, and induction into the Military Services.
( b ) Avoid inconsistencies and inequities based on ethnicity, gender, race, religion, or sexual orientation in the application of these standards by the Military Services.
( c ) Judge the suitability of individuals to serve in the Military Services on the basis of their adaptability, potential to perform, and conduct.
Date: July 29, 2013

To: Terri Plumb

Regulations Development Group

OSORA

From: Jyme Schafer

Director

Division of Medical and Surgical Services 

Coverage and Analysis Group 

Office of Clinical Standards and Quality

Subject: Rulemaking Record for CMS-1600-P: Medicare Program; Revisions to 

Payment Policies under the Physician Fee Schedule, Clinical Laboratory Fee 

Schedule & other Revisions to Part B for CY 2014

I certify that to the best of my knowledge, the attached information includes all 

material that Division of Medical and Surgical Services, Coverage and Analysis 

Group, OCSQ considered, or had before it in developing the above-referenced rule. I 

have identified any proprietary data or confidential information that should not be 

released to the public upon a request for information under the Freedom of Information 

Act (FOIA). Attached is an index of all material included.
Index of Supporting Information for:

CMS-1600-P: Medicare Program; Revisions to Payment Policies under the Physician 

Fee Schedule, Clinical Laboratory Fee Schedule & other Revisions to Part B for CY 2014

Title of Document Does this 

document 

contain 

confidential 

information or 

proprietary

data?

1. United States Preventive Services Task Force; Screening for 

Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: Recommendation Statement. 

http://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf05/aaascr/aaars.pdf

No.

2. 

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

13.
**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**


**AND
      CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








The
      undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to, and as required by, 18 U.S.C. Section
      1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that
      the Quarterly
      Report of DCAP Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended
      June 30, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that information contained
      in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.











Date:  August 13,
                2007
            /s/
                Barry B. Goldstein
              Barry
                B. Goldstein,
              Chief
                Executive Officer and
              Chief
                Financial Officer
#### (A) The People of the State of New York v. Robert McCann. (B) The People of the State of New York v. Irving Perez. (C) The People of the State of New York v. John Hauptman. (D) The People of the State of New York v. John Seymore.

Concur — McNally, J. P., Stevens, Eager, Steuer and Bastow, JJ. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Valente, McNally, Eager and Steuer, JJ. — [In each action] Motion for leave to appeal as a poor person granted to the extent and on the terms and conditions contained in the order of this court filed herein.
#### 1552.237-74 Publicity.

As prescribed in 1537.110, insert the following contract clause in contracts pertaining to the removal or remedial activities under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) (“Super Fund”) program. The term “on-scene coordinator” may be substituted with “Contracting Officer's Representative.”

# Publicity (APR 1984)

(a) The Contractor agrees to notify and obtain the verbal approval of the on-scene coordinator (or Contracting Officer's Representative) prior to releasing any information to the news media regarding the removal or remedial activities being conducted under this contract.

(b) It is also agreed that the Contractor shall acknowledge EPA support whenever the work funded in whole or in part by this contract is publicized in any news media.

(End of clause)

[49 FR 8867, Mar. 8, 1984, as amended at 78 FR 46292, July 31, 2013]
### §7441. Findings and declaration of policy

#### (a) Findings

Congress finds that—

(1) canola and rapeseed products are an important and nutritious part of the human diet;

(2) the production of canola and rapeseed products plays a significant role in the economy of the United States in that—

(A) canola and rapeseed products are produced by thousands of canola and rapeseed producers and processed by numerous processing entities; and

(B) canola and rapeseed products produced in the United States are consumed by people throughout the United States and foreign countries;

(3) canola, rapeseed, and canola and rapeseed products should be readily available and marketed efficiently to ensure that consumers have an adequate supply of canola and rapeseed products at a reasonable price;

(4) the maintenance and expansion of existing markets and development of new markets for canola, rapeseed, and canola and rapeseed products are vital to the welfare of canola and rapeseed producers and processors and those persons concerned with marketing canola, rapeseed, and canola and rapeseed products, as well as to the general economy of the United States, and are necessary to ensure the ready availability and efficient marketing of canola, rapeseed, and canola and rapeseed products;

(5) there exist established State and national organizations conducting canola and rapeseed research, promotion, and consumer education programs that are valuable to the efforts of promoting the consumption of canola, rapeseed, and canola and rapeseed products;

(6) the cooperative development, financing, and implementation of a coordinated national program of canola and rapeseed research, promotion, consumer information, and industry information is necessary to maintain and expand existing markets and develop new markets for canola, rapeseed, and canola and rapeseed products; and

(7) canola, rapeseed, and canola and rapeseed products move in interstate and foreign commerce, and canola, rapeseed, and canola and rapeseed products that do not move in interstate or foreign commerce directly burden or affect interstate commerce in canola, rapeseed, and canola and rapeseed products.

#### (b) Policy

It is the policy of this subchapter to establish an orderly procedure for developing, financing through assessments on domestically produced canola and rapeseed, and implementing a program of research, promotion, consumer information, and industry information designed to strengthen the position in the marketplace of the canola and rapeseed industry, to maintain and expand existing domestic and foreign markets and uses for canola, rapeseed, and canola and rapeseed products, and to develop new markets and uses for canola, rapeseed, and canola and rapeseed products.

#### (c) Construction

Nothing in this subchapter provides for the control of production or otherwise limits the right of individual producers to produce canola, rapeseed, or canola or rapeseed products.

(Pub. L. 104–127, title V, §532, Apr. 4, 1996, 110 Stat. 1048.)
#### William G. Spring, Jr., an Infant, by William G. Spring, His Guardian ad Litem, et al., Respondents, v. Gedney Development Corp., Appellant.

In an action by an infant plaintiff (who was three and one-half months old at the time of the accident) to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by him when, in the kitchen sink of his parents’ apartment, he came into contact with hot water from the sink faucet; and by his father to recover damages for the future loss of his services and for medical expenses, the defendant appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, rendered January 30, 1959, after a jury trial, in favor of plaintiffs. The infant suffered extensive second and third degree burns on the face and left side of the body. Defendant, the owner and operator of the apartment building, is charged with negligently supplying scalding water to the apartment in which plaintiffs lived as tenants. Judgment reversed on the facts and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event. In our opinion, the verdict is against the weight of the credible evidence. Beldock, Acting P. J., Ughetta, Christ and Pette, JJ., concur.
#### 1406.302-1 Only one responsible source and no other supplies or services will satisfy agency requirements.

For contracts that will be awarded using this authority, the notices required by FAR 5.201 shall have been published and any bids, proposals, quotations, or capability statements must have been considered.