alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND CHANGES IN MEMBER'S EQUITY, THE STATEMENT OF CASH
FLOWS, AND THE BALANCE SHEET FOR THE FORM 10-K DATED DECEMBER 31, 1999, AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000317187
<NAME> PPL ELECTRIC UTILITIES CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                        4,325
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                        796
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                             967
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                         3,004
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   9,092
<COMMON>                                         1,476
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                        (599)<F1>
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                                419
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                   1,296
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               47
<PREFERRED>                                         50
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                             3,403
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                     183
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                      352
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                         67
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                    58
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                   3,636
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                    9,092
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                        3,952
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                               151
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                       3,203
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                       3,354
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                            598
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                  97
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                     695
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           214
<NET-INCOME>                                       435<F2>
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                         37
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                      398
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                             0
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                          142
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                             645
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00
<FN>
<F1>NET OF $632 MILLION OF TREASURY STOCK
<F2>NET MILLION INCLUDES AN EXTRAORDINARY ITEM OF ($46) MILLION ($78 MILLION NET
OF $32 MILLION OF INCOME TAXES) REFLECTING THE EFFECTS OF THE EARLY
EXTINGUISHMENT OF DEBT AND A CREDIT RELATING TO WHOLESALE POWER ACTIVITY.
</FN>


</TABLE>
#### 1552.233-70 Notice of filing requirements for agency protests.

As prescribed in 1533.103, insert the following provision in all types of solicitations:

# Notice of Filing Requirements for Agency Protests (JUL 1999)

Agency protests must be filed with the Contracting Officer in accordance with the requirements of FAR 33.103 (d) and (e). Within 10 calendar days after receipt of an adverse Contracting Officer decision, the protester may submit a written request for an independent review by the Head of the Contracting Activity. This independent review is available only as an appeal of a Contracting Officer decision on a protest. Accordingly, as provided in 4 CFR 21.2(a)(3), any protest to the GAO must be filed within 10 days of knowledge of the initial adverse Agency action.

[64 FR 17110, Apr. 8, 1999, as amended at 78 FR 46291, July 31, 2013]
1825.1103-70 Export control. ( a ) *Background.* ( 1 ) NASA contractors and subcontractors are subject to U.S. export control laws and regulations, including the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR), 22 CFR parts 120 through 130, and the Export Administration Regulations (EAR), 15 CFR parts 730 through 799. The contractor is responsible for obtaining the appropriate licenses or other approvals from the Department of State or the Department of Commerce when it exports hardware, technical data, or software, or provides technical assistance to a foreign destination or “foreign person”, as defined in 22 CFR 120.16, and there are no applicable or available exemptions/exceptions to the ITAR/EAR, respectively. A person who is lawfully admitted for permanent residence in the United States is not a “foreign person”. (See 22 CFR 120.16 and 15 CFR 734.2(b)(2)(ii))
( 2 ) The exemption at 22 CFR 125.4(b)(3) of the ITAR provides that a contractor may export technical data without a license if the contract between the agency and the exporter provides for the export of the data. The clause at 1852.225-70, Alternate I, provides contractual authority for the exemption, but the exemption is available only after the contracting officer, or designated representative, provides written authorization or direction enabling its use. It is NASA policy that the exemption at 22 CFR 125.4(b)(3) may only be used when technical data (including software) is exchanged with a NASA foreign partner pursuant to the terms of an international agreement in furtherance of an international collaborative effort. The contracting officer must obtain the approval of the Center Export Administrator before granting the contractor the authority to use this exemption.
( b ) *Contract clause.* Insert the clause at 1852.225-70, Export Licenses, in all solicitations and contracts, except in contracts with foreign entities. Insert the clause with its Alternate I when the NASA project office indicates that technical data (including software) is to be exchanged by the contractor with a NASA foreign partner pursuant to an international agreement.
1505.203 Publicizing and response time. ( a ) The Contracting Officer may, at his/her discretion under certain circumstances, elect to transmit a synopsis to the Government Point of Entry (GPE) of a proposed contract action that falls within an exception to the synopsis requirement in FAR 5.202(a). For those contract actions, the Contracting Officer may provide for a lesser time period than the 15 days required by FAR 5.203(a) and the 30 days required by FAR 5.203 (c) or (d), and the 45 days required by FAR 5.203(e). The Contracting Officer must identify the basis for the lesser time periods for response in the synopsis.
( b ) The authority for paragraph (a) does not extend to the synopsis of contract actions falling within the exception in FAR 5.202(a)(7), if to do so would disclose the originality of thought or innovativeness of the proposed research.
[50 FR 14357, Apr. 11, 1985, as amended at 62 FR 33572, June 20, 1997; 81 FR 31528, May 19, 2016]
#### 14.404-4 Restrictions on disclosure of descriptive literature.

When a bid is accompanied by descriptive literature (as defined in 2.101), and the bidder imposes a restriction that prevents the public disclosure of such literature, the restriction may render the bid nonresponsive. The restriction renders the bid nonresponsive if it prohibits the disclosure of sufficient information to permit competing bidders to know the essential nature and type of the products offered or those elements of the bid that relate to quantity, price, and delivery terms. The provisions of this paragraph do not apply to unsolicited descriptive literature submitted by a bidder if such literature does not qualify the bid (see 14.202-5(e)).

[48 FR 42171, Sept. 19, 1983, as amended at 67 FR 13056, Mar. 20, 2002]
Order entered November 25, 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas** No. 05 - 14 - 01349 - CV TROY BROWN, Appellant V. CURTIS PENNINGTON, Appellee On Appeal from the 162nd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cau se No. DC - 13 - 12400 

### O RDER W e GRANT appellee’s November 24, 2014 unopposed motion for extension of time to file brief and ORDER the brief be filed no later than December 29, 2014

. /s/ CRAIG STODDART JUSTICE
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research Special Emphasis Panel; Dental Fear and Anxiety RFA Review Meeting.                    

*Date:*                         February 26, 2021.                    

*Time:*                         1:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Democracy Boulevard, Suite 668, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Nisan Bhattacharyya, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Branch, National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Democracy Boulevard, Suite 668, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-451-2405,                         *nisan_bhattacharyya@nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.121, Oral Diseases and Disorders Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: January 7, 2021. 

Melanie J. Pantoja,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2021-00494 Filed 1-12-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
### §6309. Administrative provisions

#### (a) Construction

Except as provided in subsection (b), nothing in this chapter may be construed to—

(1) preempt or supersede any other program relating to soybean promotion, research, consumer information, or industry information organized and operated under the laws of the United States or any State; or

(2) authorize the withholding of any information from Congress.

#### (b) State laws

#### (1) Referenda on qualified State soybean boards

To ensure the proper administration of this chapter, no State may conduct a referendum relating to the continuation or termination of a qualified State soybean board or State soybean assessment—

(A) during the period beginning on the date an order is issued under section 6303 of this title and ending 18 months after the referendum on such order is conducted under section 6305(a) of this title; or

(B) if such order is approved under the referendum conducted under section 6305(a) of this title by a majority of producers voting in such State, such State law shall be suspended for an additional 36 months.

#### (2) Exception

Paragraph (1) shall not be construed to apply to—

(A) a State referendum concerning the approval of modifications to a State soybean promotion program that does not involve termination of the qualified State soybean board or State soybean assessment; and

(B) any State referendum regarding a State soybean promotion program that is originated by soybean producers.

#### (3) Assessments collected by qualified State soybean boards

To ensure adequate funding of the operations of qualified State soybean boards under this chapter, whenever an order is in effect under this chapter, no State law or regulation that limits the rate of assessment that the qualified State soybean board in that State may collect from producers on soybeans produced in such State, or that has the effect of limiting such rate, may be applied to prohibit such State board from collecting, and expending for authorized purposes, assessments from producers of up to the full amount of the credit authorized for producer contributions to qualified State soybean boards under section 6304(l)(4) of this title.

#### (c) Amendments to orders

The provisions of this chapter applicable to orders shall be applicable to amendments to orders.

(Pub. L. 101–624, title XIX, §1974, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 3903; Pub. L. 102–237, title VIII, §806(3), Dec. 13, 1991, 105 Stat. 1883.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1991—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 102–237, §806(3)(B), redesignated second subsec. (b), relating to amendments to orders, as (c).

Subsec. (b)(3). Pub. L. 102–237, §806(3)(A), substituted "section 6304(l)(4)" for "section 6304(k)(4)".

Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 102–237, §806(3)(B), redesignated second subsec. (b), relating to amendments of orders, as (c).
Exhibit 32(a)



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Ethyl Corporation (the Company) for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Thomas E. Gottwald, chief executive officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:



(1) the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|By:                                   |  | /s/    Thomas E. Gottwald
|------------------------------------- |  | -------------------------
|Thomas E. Gottwald                   
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|November 5, 2003
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. AD21-8-000; Docket No. ER02-2001-000]

      ( print page 6318)    
As announced in the Notice of Technical Conference issued on January 8, 2021, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission staff will convene a technical conference on February 24, 2021 as part of a reassessment of the Electric Quarterly Report (EQR) requirements, in Docket No. AD21-8-000. The purpose of this technical conference is to provide a forum for Commission staff, filers, and data users to discuss potential changes to the current EQR data fields. This technical conference is intended to be the first in a series of conferences related to a reassessment of the EQR requirements.

All future notices, submittals, and issuances pertaining to the technical conferences will be issued in Docket No. AD21-8-000. There is an “eSubscription” link on the Commission's website that enables subscribers to receive email notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s).

Dated: January 13, 2021.

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,

Deputy Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2021-01182 Filed 1-19-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
#### RICKEY WAYNE MELLON v. CATHIE W. PROSSER, Individually, and as a Deputy of the Cleveland County Sheriff’s Department; DAN CRAWFORD, Sheriff of Cleveland County; and CLEVELAND COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT

No. 361A97

(Filed 6 February 1998)

Appeal of right by defendants pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) of the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 126 N.C. App. 620, 486 S.E.2d 439 (1997), reversing an order entered on 13 May 1996 by Ferrell, J., in Superior Court, Cleveland County. Heard in the Supreme Court on 16 December 1997.

*No brief for plaintiff-appellee.*

*Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice, by G. Michael Barnhill and W. Clark Goodman, for defendant-appellants.*

PER CURIAM.

That part of the opinion of the majority in the Court of Appeals remanding this action to the Superior Court for joinder of the sheriff’s surety as a party is reversed for the reasons set forth in the dissenting opinion of Judge Wynn. In all other respects, the opinion of the majority in the Court of Appeals is affirmed for the reasons stated therein.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART.
#### Louise Guerin *v.*Nicholas Norton, Welfare Commissioner, et al.

House, C. J., Shapiro, Loiselle, MacDonald and Bogdanski, Js.

Argued October 2

decision released November 5, 1974

*Francis J. MacGregor,*assistant attorney general, with whom, on the brief, was *Robert K. Killian,*attorney general, for the appellant (named defendant).

*Mary R. Hennessey,*for the appellee (plaintiff).

*283Pee Cttrtam.

This appeal is ancillary to a welfare department fair hearing proceeding wherein subpoenas were issued by the plaintiff’s counsel directing the welfare commissioner and two of his subordinates to appear as witnesses at that hearing. Neither the welfare commissioner nor his subordinates appeared as directed. Thereafter, the plaintiff brought an application to the Superior Court seeking a citation to compel them to appear in court and answer questions pursuant to the previously issued subpoenas. Upon the issuance of a citation by the court, the defendants filed a plea in abatement alleging that “the court had no jurisdiction to sign the citation order.” The court overruled the plea in abatement from which decision the commissioner has appealed to this court.

An appeal to this court may be taken only from a final judgment. General Statutes § 52-263; Practice Book § 600; *Tough*v. *Ives,*159 Conn. 605, 606, 268 A.2d 371; *Howarth*v. *Northcott,*152 Conn. 460, 462, 208 A.2d 540. The absence of a final judgment goes to the jurisdiction of the court. Any appeal which is not from a final judgment must be rejected even though that issue has not been raised by the parties. *Hoberman*v. *Lake of Isles, Inc.,*138 Conn. 573, 574, 87 A.2d 137.

The overruling of a plea in abatement does not constitute a final judgment. *Morse*v. *Rankin,*51 Conn. 326, 328-29; Maltbie, Conn. App. Proc. § 15; 4 C.J.S., Appeal and Error, § 119. The ruling was interlocutory. “ ‘Such rulings are those made in the course of the proceeding, the object of which is to bring the parties to, and present to the court for determination, the ultimate issues which determine the right of a party to the relief he claims, but which *284neither terminate the action nor determine those issues in such a manner as to put it beyond the power of the court to alter its decision except as it may reopen the judgment it has rendered. *Batesville*v. *Ball,*100 Ark. 496, 500, 140 S.W. 712.’ *State*v. *Kemp,*[124 Conn. 639, 643, 1 A.2d 761].” *Luliewicz*v. *Eastern Malleable Iron Co.,*126 Conn. 522, 525, 12 A.2d 779.

Since the lack of a final judgment is a jurisdictional defect, the appeal must be dismissed. *Sewer Commission*v. *Norton,*164 Conn. 2, 6, 316 A.2d 775; *Cone*v. *Darrow,*148 Conn. 109, 112, 167 A.2d 852; *Costecski*v. *Skarulis,*103 Conn. 762, 763, 131 A. 398.

The appeal is dismissed.
Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

 Docket Number: FAA-2014-0055

 Directorate Identifier: 2013-NM-167AD

A310-28-2145 --- 8/21/01

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008
13.303-4 Clauses. ( a ) The contracting officer shall insert in each BPA the clauses prescribed elsewhere in this part that are required for or applicable to the particular BPA.
( b ) Unless a clause prescription specifies otherwise (e.g., see 22.305(a), 22.605(a)(5), or 22.1006), if the prescription includes a dollar threshold, the amount to be compared to that threshold is that of any particular order under the BPA.
M. P. No. 75-111.

#### City of Warwick *v.*Warwick Regular Firemen's Association *et al.*

*William J. Toohey,*City Solicitor, for petitioner. *Thomas S. Hogan,*for respondents.

Petition for writ of certiorari is denied without prejudice to the filing of a new petition which will be in full compliance with Rule 13 of the rules of court.