alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

          - [RTID 0648-XA731]

# AGENCY:

National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

# ACTION:

Notice; public meeting.

# SUMMARY:

The Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council's (MAFMC's) Tilefish Monitoring Committee (MC) will hold a public meeting.

# DATES:

                        The meeting will be held on Tuesday, March 16, 2021, from 10 a.m. to 11:30 a.m. For agenda details, see                         **SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION**                        .                    

# ADDRESSES:

                        The meeting will be held via webinar, which can be accessed at:                         *http://mafmc.adobeconnect.com/​tf2021mc/​.*                         Meeting audio can also be accessed via telephone by dialing 1-800-832-0736 and entering room number 5068609.                    

*Council address:*                         Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council, 800 N. State Street, Suite 201, Dover, DE 19901; telephone: (302) 674-2331;                         *www.mafmc.org.*

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Christopher M. Moore, Ph.D., Executive Director, Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council, telephone: (302) 526-5255.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The purpose of this meeting is for the Tilefish MC to set blueline tilefish specifications for 2022-24. The MC will review annual catch limits, trip limits, discard estimates, and other management measures for the blueline tilefish fishery.

## Special Accommodations

The meeting is physically accessible to people with disabilities. Requests for sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aids should be directed to M. Jan Saunders at the Mid-Atlantic Council Office, (302) 526-5251, at least 5 days prior to the meeting date.

Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801*et seq.*

Dated: January 11, 2021.

Rey Israel Marquez,

Acting Deputy Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service.

[FR Doc. 2021-00715 Filed 1-13-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-22-P
### §11. Same; modification or correction; grounds; order

In either of the following cases the United States court in and for the district wherein the award was made may make an order modifying or correcting the award upon the application of any party to the arbitration—

(a) Where there was an evident material miscalculation of figures or an evident material mistake in the description of any person, thing, or property referred to in the award.

(b) Where the arbitrators have awarded upon a matter not submitted to them, unless it is a matter not affecting the merits of the decision upon the matter submitted.

(c) Where the award is imperfect in matter of form not affecting the merits of the controversy.

The order may modify and correct the award, so as to effect the intent thereof and promote justice between the parties.

(July 30, 1947, ch. 392, 61 Stat. 673.)

#### Derivation

Act Feb. 12, 1925, ch. 213, §11, 43 Stat. 885.
#### Lena Ferrandino et al., Doing Business as Marbetti, Appellants, v. Frances L. Cartelli, as Executrix of Carmello Lozito, Deceased, et al., Respondents.

Order entered on October 2, 1959 and the judgment thereon dismissing the complaint on the ground of another pending action between the parties reversed, on the law, on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, with costs to plaintiffs-appellants and the motion denied, with $10 costs. In the prior action judgment was entered December 26, 1958 after inquest. In this action on July 23, 1959' defendant-respondent moved to dismiss the complaint on the ground that the prior action was pending. (Rules Civ. Prac., rule 107, subd. 3.) In the interim the moving defendant had moved to vacate the judgment in the prior action on the ground that she had not been served with process. No prior action was pending when the order to dismiss this action was made because judgment had been entered in the prior action. The judgment in the first action terminated the action and the pendency of the motion to vacate it did not serve to convert it into a pending action. *(Porter*v. *Kingsbury,*77 N. Y. 164, 169; see, also, *Gentilala*v. *Fay Taxicabs,*243 N. Y. 397.) In any event defendant should be estopped from claiming the existence of a prior action, where it has been demonstrated that the prior action, on defendant’s objection, was void because of lack of prior service of process. To claim successfully that a prior action is a nullity, and then to assert it bars a subsequent action is a completely inconsistent position. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Valente, McNally and Stevens, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 61 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 61

To remove the sunset provision of section 203 of Public Law 105-384 and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 9, 2017

 Ms. Cantwell (for herself, Ms. Murkowski, Mr. Wyden, Mrs. Murray, Mr. 
 Merkley, and Mrs. Feinstein) introduced the following bill; which was 
  read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and 
                             Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To remove the sunset provision of section 203 of Public Law 105-384 and 
                          for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DUNGENESS CRAB FISHERY MANAGEMENT.

    Section 203 of the Act entitled ``An Act to approve a governing 
international agreement between the United States and the Republic of 
Poland, and for other purposes'', approved November 13, 1998 (Public 
Law 105-384; 16 U.S.C. 1856 note), is amended--
            (1) by striking subsection (i); and
            (2) by redesignating subsection (j) as subsection (i).
                                 <all>
```
#### Pat Hartly, Inc., Respondent, v. American Reciprocal Insurers et al., Appellants.

Judgment in the amount of $60,818.68 pursuant to jury verdict in favor of plaintiff insured on fire insurance policy, unanimously reversed and verdict vacated, on the law, with costs to abide the event, and a new trial ordered. The instruction to the jury concerning fraud and false swearing by plaintiff in presenting the claim was insufficient. Included in defendants’ written requests to charge were several which in substance presented the language of the policy provision, its applicability to the case, and stated that knowing material misrepresentation of the extent of damage to induce an excessive payment by defendants would necessitate a verdict for defendants. Yet the trial court merely read the policy provision and stated, negatively, that “ The misstatement must be false and fraudulent before it [the policy] can be held to be void.” The issue -was of central importance, and the jury should have been affirmatively instructed in substance that the policy provision was applicable and that the verdict should be for defendants if there had been a material fraud by plaintiff in presenting the claim (see, e.g., *Domagalski*v. *Springfield Fire & Mar. Ins. Co.,*218 App. Div. 187, 189-190). Also, the charge was erroneous because it was ambiguous and contradictory as to the measure of damages (cf. *Moore*v. *Crestwood Manor,*286 App. Div. 851; *Schafer*v. *Norwood Equip. Corp.,*277 App. Div. 933). In its main charge the court correctly instructed that the measure of damages was the difference between the market value of the goods immediately before and after the fire (see *Molot, Inc.*v. *Commonwealth Ins. Co.,*10 A D 2d 683; 13 N. Y. Jur., Damages, § 96). However, at plaintiff’s request the court later charged that “ the measure of the plaintiff’s damage * * * is the cost of manufacture to the plaintiff.” There was evidence that the goods had lost value through age. If so, the cost of manufacture may have exceeded market value before the fire. Therefore the later instruction was not only ambiguous, but erroneous and contradictory if interpreted as stating that the measure of damages is the difference between the cost of manufacture and the market value after the fire. Concur — Breitel, J. P., McNally, Stevens, Eager and Steuer, JJ.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsFuture Assets, Student Talent (FAST)Future Assets, Student Talent (FAST) motivates and prepares talented students with disabilities to further their education and achieve High Tech and professional employment. The FAST program is managed by local professionals, business, and industry leaders; it is modeled after High School High Tech project TAKE CHARGE started in Los Angeles in 1983. Through cooperative efforts of Alabama Department of Education, Vocational Rehabilitation, Adult and Children Services, and the President's Committee on Employment of People with Disabilities, north central Alabama was chosen as the second site for a High School High Tech project. In 1986 local business, industry, education, government agencies, and rehabilitation representatives started FAST. The program objectives and goals, results and accomplishments, and survey results are included.Document ID19930007435Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1992Subject CategorySocial Sciences (General)Report/Patent NumberNAS 1.26:191632NASA-CR-191632Accession Number93N16624Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAGW-3142Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19930007435.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

ERIK JOHNSON and MATTHEW TOPORSKI, on )

behalf of themselves and all other persons similarly )

situated, known and unknown, )

) Case No. 12 C 1018

Plaintiffs, )

) Judge Gettleman

v. )

) Magistrate Judge Rowland

PINSTRIPES, INC., PINSTRIPES NORTHBROOK, )

LLC, and DALE R. SCHWARTZ, )

)

Defendants. )

JOINT MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL 

OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

The Parties, by their counsel, hereby move this Court for an order preliminarily 

approving the Class Action Settlement. In support of this motion, Named Plaintiffs submit the 

Settlement Agreement, a memorandum of law, and related documents. 

/s/Jamie G. Sypulski /s/Joel O’Malley

Class Counsel Counsel for Defendants

LAW OFFICE DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP

JAMIE GOLDEN SYPULSKI

Jamie G. Sypulski Joseph W. Hammell

150 South Michigan Avenue Ryan E. Mick

Suite 1000 Joel O’Malley

Chicago, IL 60601 50 S 6th Street, Suite 1500

Telephone (312) 332-6202 Minneapolis, MN 55402-1498

Telephone (612) 340-2600

WERMAN SALAS, P.C.

Douglas M. Werman

Maureen A. Salas

Werman Salas, P.C.

77 West Washington

Suite 1402

Chicago, IL 60602

Telephone (312) 419-1008

Case: 1:12-cv-01018 Document #: 91 Filed: 07/31/14 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:790
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-50260

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JAMES ALBERT GRIFFITH,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 7:11-CR-337-1

Before ELROD, SOUTHWICK, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent James Albert 

Griffith has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance 

with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 

F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Griffith has not filed a response. We have reviewed 

counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We 

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

October 30, 2019

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 19-50260 Document: 00515180170 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/30/2019
No. 19-50260

2

issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw 

is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the 

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 19-50260 Document: 00515180170 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/30/2019
#### 1327.304-4 Appeals.

The designee authorized to provide the contractor with a written statement of the basis for taking the actions described in FAR 27.304-5(a) is set forth in CAM 1301.70.
§ 989.13 Categorical exclusion. ( a ) CATEXs define those categories of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have potential for significant effect on the environment and do not, therefore, require further environmental analysis in an EA or an EIS. The list of Air Force-approved CATEXs is in appendix B. Supplements to this part may not add CATEXs or expand the scope of the CATEXs in appendix B.
( b ) Characteristics of categories of actions that usually do not require either an EIS or an EA (in the absence of extraordinary circumstances) include: ( 1 ) Minimal adverse effect on environmental quality.
( 2 ) No significant change to existing environmental conditions.
( 3 ) No significant cumulative environmental impact.
( 4 ) Socioeconomic effects only.
( 5 ) Similarity to actions previously assessed and found to have no significant environmental impacts.
( c ) CATEXs apply to actions in the United States and abroad. General exemptions specific to actions abroad are in 32 CFR part 187. The EPF or other decision-maker forwards requests for additional exemption determinations for actions abroad to HQ USAF/A7CI with a justification letter.
( d ) Normally, any decision-making level may determine the applicability of a CATEX and need not formally record the determination on AF Form 813 or elsewhere, except as noted in the CATEX list.
( e ) Application of a CATEX to an action does not eliminate the need to meet air conformity requirements (see § 989.30).
[64 FR 38129, July 15, 1999, as amended at 66 FR 16868, Mar. 28, 2001; 72 FR 37106, July 9, 2007]
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 767 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 767

    To provide that the Executive Order entitled ``Promoting Energy 
Independence and Economic Growth'' and signed on March 28, 2017, shall 
            have no force or effect, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 29, 2017

  Mr. Bennet (for himself, Mrs. Shaheen, Mr. Booker, Mr. Cardin, Mr. 
Sanders, Mr. Markey, Mr. Merkley, Mr. Reed, Mr. Durbin, Mr. Whitehouse, 
Mrs. Gillibrand, Mr. Udall, Ms. Cortez Masto, Mr. Heinrich, Ms. Warren, 
   Mr. Wyden, Mr. Franken, Ms. Hassan, Mr. Nelson, Ms. Harris, Mrs. 
   Murray, Mr. Coons, Mrs. Feinstein, Ms. Klobuchar, Mr. Schatz, Mr. 
   Menendez, Mr. Leahy, Mr. Blumenthal, Mr. Carper, Ms. Hirono, Mr. 
 Murphy, and Mr. Van Hollen) introduced the following bill; which was 
  read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public 
                                 Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To provide that the Executive Order entitled ``Promoting Energy 
Independence and Economic Growth'' and signed on March 28, 2017, shall 
            have no force or effect, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Clean Air, Healthy Kids Act''.

SEC. 2. EXECUTIVE ORDER TO HAVE NO FORCE OR EFFECT.

    The Executive Order entitled ``Promoting Energy Independence and 
Economic Growth'' and signed on March 28, 2017--
            (1) is null and void;
            (2) shall have no force or effect; and
            (3) may not be implemented, administered, enforced, or 
        carried out by any Federal agency, including--
                    (A) the Office of Management and Budget;
                    (B) the Council of Economic Advisers;
                    (C) the Council on Environmental Quality;
                    (D) the Environmental Protection Agency;
                    (E) the Department of the Interior; and
                    (F) any other agency directed to implement the 
                Executive Order.

SEC. 3. NO FEDERAL FUNDS AVAILABLE.

    No Federal funds made available for any fiscal year may be used to 
implement, administer, enforce, or carry out the Executive Order 
described in section 2.

SEC. 4. SAVINGS PROVISION.

    Nothing in this Act shall be construed to impair any authority 
granted to the President.

SEC. 5. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    This Act shall take effect on March 28, 2017.
                                 <all>
```
16.205-3 Limitations. This contract type shall not be used unless— ( a ) Negotiations have established that ( 1 ) the conditions for use of a firm-fixed-price contract are not present (see 16.202-2), and
( 2 ) a fixed-price incentive contract would not be more appropriate;
( b ) The contractor's accounting system is adequate for price redetermination;
( c ) The prospective pricing periods can be made to conform with operation of the contractor's accounting system; and
( d ) There is reasonable assurance that price redetermination actions will take place promptly at the specified times.
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 9 (Thursday, January 14, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3226-3227]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-00628]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 11309]


Designation of Isma'il Fu'ad Rasul Ahmed as a Specially 
Designated Global Terrorist

    Acting under the authority of and in accordance with section 
1(a)(ii)(B) of Executive Order 13224 of September 23, 2001, as amended 
by Executive Order 13268 of July 2, 2002, Executive Order

[[Page 3227]]

13284 of January 23, 2003, and Executive Order 13886 of September 9, 
2019, I hereby determine that the person known as Isma'il Fu'ad Rasul 
Ahmed, also known as Abdallah Kurdi, is a foreign person who is a 
leader of al-Qa'ida Kurdish Battalions, a group whose property and 
interests in property are concurrently blocked pursuant to a 
determination by the Secretary of State pursuant to Executive Order 
13224.
    Consistent with the determination in section 10 of Executive Order 
13224 that prior notice to persons determined to be subject to the 
Order who might have a constitutional presence in the United States 
would render ineffectual the blocking and other measures authorized in 
the Order because of the ability to transfer funds instantaneously, I 
determine that no prior notice needs to be provided to any person 
subject to this determination who might have a constitutional presence 
in the United States, because to do so would render ineffectual the 
measures authorized in the Order.
    This notice shall be published in the Federal Register.

    Dated: January 6, 2021.
Michael R. Pompeo,
Secretary of State.
[FR Doc. 2021-00628 Filed 1-13-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-AD-P
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 20- 0407 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. KEITH WILLIAM WALKER,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including May 31 , 2021 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

April 23 2021

04/23/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0407