Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 106 / Thursday, June 3, 2010 / Rules and Regulations 31317 

Filing a petition for reconsideration by 

the Administrator of this final rule does 

not affect the finality of this action for 

the purposes of judicial review nor does 

it extend the time within which a 

petition for judicial review may be filed, 

and shall not postpone the effectiveness 

of such rule or action. This action may 

not be challenged later in proceedings to 

enforce its requirements. (See section 

307(b)(2).) 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Carbon moNOXide, 

Incorporation by reference, 

Intergovernmental relations, Lead, 

Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate 

matter, Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile 

organic compounds. 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Dated: May 17, 2010. 

Carol Rushin, 

Deputy Regional Administrator, Region 8. 

40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows: 

PART 52—[AMENDED] 

■ 1. The authority citation for Part 52 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Subpart G—Colorado 

■ 2. Section 52.352 is added to subpart 

G to read as follows: 

§ 52.352 Interstate transport. 

Addition to the Colorado State 

Implementation Plan of the Colorado 

Interstate Transport SIP regarding the 

1997 8–Hour Ozone Standard for the 

‘‘significant contribution’’ requirement, 

as adopted by the Colorado Air Quality 

Control Commission on December 30, 

2008, State effective January 30, 2009, 

and submitted by the Governor’s 

designee on June 18, 2009. 

[FR Doc. 2010–13050 Filed 6–2–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 63 

[EPA–HQ–OAR–2008–0053; FRL–9158–1] 

RIN 2060–AN47 

National Emission Standards for 

Hazardous Air Pollutants: Area Source 

Standards for Paints and Allied 

Products Manufacturing; Amendments 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Direct final rule. 

SUMMARY: EPA is taking direct final 

action on amendments to the paints and 

allied products manufacturing area 

source rule. With this direct final rule, 

EPA is amending the definition of 

‘‘material containing hazardous air 

pollutants.’’ It was not EPA’s intent to 

omit the part of this definition that 

addresses non-carcinogens, and this 

omission could potentially and 

erroneously include facilities as 

applicable to the rule when they should 

not be covered. 

This action clarifies text of the 

National Emission Standards for 

Hazardous Air Pollutants: Paints and 

Allied Products Manufacturing Area 

Source Standards which was published 

on December 3, 2009. This action will 

not change the level of health protection 

the final rule provides or the standards 

and other requirements established by 

the rule. 

DATES: This direct final rule is effective 

on September 16, 2010 without further 

notice, unless EPA receives relevant 

adverse comment by July 19, 2010. If 

EPA receives relevant adverse comment, 

we will publish a timely withdrawal in 

the Federal Register informing the 

public that the amendments in this rule 

will not take effect. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID No. EPA–HQ– 

OAR–2008–0053, by one of the 

following methods: 

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: 

www.regulations.gov: Follow the 

instructions for submitting comments. 

• Agency Web site: www.epa.gov/oar/ 

docket.html. Follow the instructions for 

submitting comments on the EPA Air 

and Radiation Docket Web site. 

• E-mail: a-and-r-Docket@epa.gov. 

Include Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–OAR– 

2008–0053 in the subject line of the 

message. 

• Fax: Send comments to (202) 566– 

9744, Attention Docket ID No. EPA– 

HQ–OAR–2008–0053. 

• Mail: Area Source NESHAP for 

Paints and Allied Products 

Manufacturing Docket, Environmental 

Protection Agency, Air and Radiation 

Docket and Information Center, 

Mailcode: 2822T, 1200 Pennsylvania 

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20460. 

Please include a total of two copies. In 

addition, please mail a copy of your 

comments on the information collection 

provisions to the Office of Information 

and Regulatory Affairs, Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB), Attn: 

Desk Officer for EPA, 725 17th Street, 

NW., Washington, DC 20503. 

• Hand Delivery: EPA Docket Center, 

Public Reading Room, EPA West, Room 

3334, 1301 Constitution Avenue, NW., 

Washington, DC 20460. Such deliveries 

are only accepted during the Docket’s 

normal hours of operation, and special 

arrangements should be made for 

deliveries of boxed information. 

Instructions: Direct your comments to 

Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–OAR–2008– 

0053. EPA’s policy is that all comments 

received will be included in the public 

docket without change and may be 

made available online at http:// 

www.regulations.gov, including any 

personal information provided, unless 

the comment includes information 

claimed to be confidential business 

information (CBI) or other information 

whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Do not submit information that you 

consider to be CBI or otherwise 

protected through http:// 

www.regulations.gov or e-mail. The 

http://www.regulations.gov Web site is 

an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which 

means EPA will not know your identity 

or contact information unless you 

provide it in the body of your comment. 

If you send an e-mail comment directly 

to EPA without going through http:// 

www.regulations.gov, your e-mail 

address will be automatically captured 

and included as part of the comment 

that is placed in the public docket and 

made available on the Internet. If you 

submit an electronic comment, EPA 

recommends that you include your 

name and other contact information in 

the body of your comment and with any 

disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA 

cannot read your comment due to 

technical difficulties and cannot contact 

you for clarification, EPA may not be 

able to consider your comment. 

Electronic files should avoid the use of 

special characters, any form of 

encryption, and be free of any defects or 

viruses. 

Docket: EPA has established a docket 

for this action under Docket ID No. 

EPA–HQ–OAR–2008–0053. All 

documents in the docket are listed in 

the Federal Docket Management System 

index at http://www.regulations.gov. 

Although listed in the index, some 

information is not publicly available 

(e.g., CBI or other information whose 

disclosure is restricted by statute). 

Certain other material, such as 

copyrighted material, will be publicly 

available only in hard copy form. 

Publicly available docket materials are 

available either electronically through 

http://www.regulations.gov or in hard 

copy at the EPA Docket Center, Public 

Reading Room, EPA West, Room 3334, 

1301 Constitution Ave., NW., 

Washington, DC. The Public Reading 

Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 

p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with RULES
31318 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 106 / Thursday, June 3, 2010 / Rules and Regulations 

legal holidays. The telephone number 

for the Public Reading Room is (202) 

566–1744, and the telephone number for 

the Air Docket is (202) 566–1742. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Melissa Payne, Regulatory Development 

and Policy Analysis Group, Office of Air 

Quality Planning and Standards (C404– 

05), Environmental Protection Agency, 

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711. 

Telephone number: (919) 541–3609; fax 

number: (919) 541–0242; e-mail 

address: payne.melissa@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

information presented in this preamble 

is organized as follows: 

I. Why is EPA using a direct final rule? 

II. Does this action apply to me? 

III. Where can I get a copy of this document? 

IV. Why are we amending the rule? 

V. What amendments are we making to the 

rule? 

VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews 

A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory 

Planning and Review 

B. Paperwork Reduction Act 

C. Regulatory Flexibility Act 

D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism 

F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and 

Coordination With Indian Tribal 

Governments 

G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of 

Children From Environmental Health 

and Safety Risks 

H. Executive Order 13211: Actions 

Concerning Regulations That 

Significantly Affect Energy Supply, 

Distribution, or Use 

I. National Technology Transfer and 

Advancement Act 

J. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions To 

Address Environmental Justice in 

Minority Populations and Low-Income 

Populations 

K. Congressional Review Act 

I. Why is EPA using a direct final rule? 

We are publishing this rule without a 

prior proposed rule because we view 

this as a non-controversial action and 

anticipate no adverse comment. This 

action amends the definition of 

‘‘material containing HAP’’ to include 

non-carcinogens in quantities of 1.0 

percent by mass or more. It was the 

intent of EPA to include this complete 

definition, but we inadvertently omitted 

the language regarding the 1.0 percent 

level for non-carcinogens, as defined by 

the Occupational Safety and Health 

Administration (OSHA) at 29 CFR 

1910.1200(g). 

It was not EPA’s intent to omit the 

part of this definition that addresses 

non-carcinogens, and this omission 

could potentially and erroneously 

include facilities as applicable to the 

rule that are not part of the source 

category as defined in the inventory, 

which took into account the Toxics 

Release Inventory (TRI) de minimis 

thresholds. 

Because this is an amendment of 

regulatory language through a rule 

action, a rule redline has been created 

of the current rule with the 

amendments, and has been placed in 

the docket to aid the public’s ability to 

comment on the regulatory text. If we 

receive relevant adverse comment on 

this direct final rule, we will publish a 

timely withdrawal in the Federal 

Register informing the public that the 

amendments in this rule will not take 

effect. Any parties interested in 

commenting must do so at this time. 

II. Does this action apply to me? 

Regulated Entities. The regulated 

categories and entities potentially 

affected by the final rule include: 

Category NAICS code 1 Examples of regulated entities 

Paint & Coating Manufacturing ................. 325510 Area source facilities engaged in mixing pigments, solvents, and binders into paints 

and other coatings, such as stains, varnishes, lacquers, enamels, shellacs, and 

water repellant coatings for concrete and masonry. 

Adhesive Manufacturing ........................... 325520 Area source facilities primarily engaged in manufacturing adhesives, glues, and 

caulking compounds. 

Printing Ink Manufacturing ........................ 325910 Area source facilities primarily engaged in manufacturing printing inkjet inks and 

inkjet cartridges. 

All Other Miscellaneous Chemical Product and Preparation Manufacturing.325998 Area source facilities primarily engaged in manufacturing indelible ink, India ink 

writing ink, and stamp pad ink. 

1 North American Industry Classification System. 

This table is not intended to be 

exhaustive, but rather provides a guide 

for readers regarding entities likely to be 

affected by this action. To determine 

whether your facility is regulated by this 

action, you should examine the 

applicability criteria in 40 CFR 

63.11599, subpart CCCCCCC (NESHAP 

for Area Sources: Paints and Allied 

Products Manufacturing). If you have 

any questions regarding the 

applicability of this action to a 

particular entity, consult either the state 

delegated authority or the EPA regional 

representative, as listed in 40 CFR 63.13 

of subpart A (General Provisions). 

III. Where can I get a copy of this 

document? 

Electronic Access. In addition to being 

available in the docket, an electronic 

copy of this final action will also be 

available on the Worldwide Web 

(WWW) through the Technology 

Transfer Network (TTN). Following 

signature, a copy of this final action will 

be posted on the TTN’s policy and 

guidance page for newly proposed or 

promulgated rules at the following 

address: http://www.epa.gov/ttn/oarpg/. 

The TTN provides information and 

technology exchange in various areas of 

air pollution control. 

IV. Why are we amending the rule? 

Our intention in this area source rule 

was to reflect the TRI de minimis 

thresholds for both carcinogens (0.1 

percent HAP concentration) and noncarcinogens (1.0 percent HAP 

concentration) in the definition of 

‘‘material containing HAP’’ however, 

only the threshold for carcinogens is 

currently reflected. To correct this error, 

we are amending the rule to add the 1.0 

percent concentration threshold for noncarcinogens. 

These concentration levels are 

consistent with the OSHA Hazard 

Communication Standard requirements 

for development of a Material Safety 

Data Sheet (MSDS), which is how paints 

and allied products manufacturers 

receive information on the toxicity of 

the raw materials they use (See 29 FR 

1910.1200(g)). The concentration level 

for hazardous chemicals is 1.0 percent, 

unless the chemical is an OSHA-defined 

carcinogen. The concentration level for 

OSHA-defined carcinogens is 0.1 

percent. We inadvertently omitted 

mentioning the 1.0 percent for noncarcinogens portion of the definition in 

the definition for ‘‘material containing 

HAP’’ in the area source standards for 

Paints and Allied Products 

Manufacturing (40 FR 63.11607). 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 106 / Thursday, June 3, 2010 / Rules and Regulations 31319 

The amendment will not change the 

level of health protection the rule 

provides or the standards established by 

the rule. To quote the TRI rule that 

codified the concentration levels, ‘‘EPA 

does not expect that the processing and 

use of mixtures containing less than the 

de minimis concentration would, in 

most instances, contribute significantly 

to the threshold determinations or 

releases of listed toxic chemicals from 

any given facility.’’ (53 FR 4509). In 

other words, mixtures with 

concentration levels under the de 

minimis levels are not concentrations of 

concern under TRI. 

Furthermore, this amendment will 

accurately reflect the regulated source 

category, as non-carcinogens with less 

than 1.0 percent by mass were not 

intended to be regulated as part of the 

source category, because the source 

category as defined excluded sources 

below this level. Also, the complete de 

mimimis threshold definition may 

encourage manufacturers to replace 

some carcinogenic raw materials with 

noncarcinogenic raw materials. No costs 

or other impacts are associated with this 

amendment. 

V. What amendments are we making to 

the rule? 

On December 3, 2009 the EPA 

published the national emission 

standards for hazardous air pollutants 

(NESHAP) for area source paints and 

allied products manufacturing facilities 

as subpart CCCCCCC in 40 CFR part 63 

(74 FR 63504). This action corrects the 

error in this regulation. 

As currently written, 40 CFR 63.11607 

defines ‘‘material containing HAP’’ as ‘‘a 

material containing benzene, methylene 

chloride, or compounds of cadmium, 

chromium, lead, and/or nickel, in 

amounts greater than or equal to 0.1 

percent by weight, as shown in 

formulation data provided by the 

manufacturer or supplier, such as the 

Material Safety Data Sheet for the 

material. Benzene and methylene 

chloride are volatile HAP. Compounds 

of cadmium, chromium, lead and/or 

nickel are metal HAP.’’ The correct 

definition is, ‘‘* * * in amounts greater 

than or equal to 0.1 percent by weight 

for carcinogens or 1.0 percent by weight 

for non-carcinogens, as shown in * * * 

(emphasis added). This single change 

provides further clarification to the 

applicability provisions that are 

referenced in the final rule, as well as 

accurately reflecting the thresholds used 

in the TRI and reference at the time the 

source category was defined. This action 

notifies interested parties of the 

corrections. 

VI. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews 

A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory 

Planning and Review 

This action is not a ‘‘significant 

regulatory action’’ under the terms of 

Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, 

October 4, 1993) and is, therefore, not 

subject to review under the Executive 

Order. 

B. Paperwork Reduction Act 

This action does not impose any new 

information collection burden. The 

proposed amendments result in no 

changes to the information collection 

requirements of the existing standards 

of performance and will have little or no 

impact on the information collection 

estimate of projected cost and hour 

burden made and approved by the 

Office of Management and Budget 

(OMB) during the development of the 

existing standards of performance. 

Therefore, the information collection 

requests have not been amended. 

However, OMB has previously approved 

the information collection requirements 

contained in the existing regulations 

(subpart CCCCCCC, 40 CFR part 63) 

under the provisions of the Paperwork 

Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq., 

and has assigned OMB control number 

2060–0633 (ICR 23487.02). The OMB 

control numbers for EPA’s regulations 

in 40 CFR are listed in 40 CFR part 9. 

C. Regulatory Flexibility Act 

The Regulatory Flexibility Act 

generally requires an agency to prepare 

a regulatory flexibility analysis of any 

rule subject to notice and comment 

rulemaking requirements under the 

Administrative Procedure Act or any 

other statute unless the agency certifies 

that the rule would not have a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities. 

Small entities include small businesses, 

small not-for-profit enterprises, and 

small governmental jurisdictions. 

For the purposes of assessing the 

impacts of this direct final rule on small 

entities, a small entity is defined as: (1) 

A small business that meets the Small 

Business Administration size standards 

for small businesses found at 13 CFR 

121.201; (2) a small governmental 

jurisdiction that is a government of a 

city, county, town, school district, or 

special district with a population of less 

than 50,000; and (3) a small 

organization that is any not-for-profit 

enterprise which is independently 

owned and operated and is not 

dominant in its field. 

After considering the economic 

impacts of this direct final rule on small 

entities, I certify that this action will not 

have a significant economic impact on 

a substantial number of small entities. 

Although this direct final rule will not 

have a significant economic impact on 

a substantial number of small entities, 

EPA nonetheless has tried to reduce the 

impact of this rule on small entities. If 

adopted, the amended definition for 

‘‘material containing HAP’’ will not 

adversely impact small entities, as the 

thresholds for the noncarcinogenic HAP 

are below the TRI levels of concern for 

this source category. 

D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

This direct final does not contain a 

Federal mandate that may result in 

expenditures of $100 million or more 

for State, local, and tribal governments, 

in the aggregate, or to the private sector 

in any one year. This direct final is not 

expected to impact State, local, or tribal 

governments. Thus, this rule would not 

be subject to the requirements of 

sections 202 and 205 of the Unfunded 

Mandates Reform Act (UMRA). 

This final rule would also not be 

subject to the requirements of section 

203 of UMRA because it contains no 

regulatory requirements that might 

significantly or uniquely affect small 

governments. 

E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism 

This direct final rule does not have 

federalism implications. It will not have 

substantial direct effects on the States, 

on the relationship between the national 

government and the States, or on the 

distribution of power and 

responsibilities among the various 

levels of government, as specified in 

Executive Order 13132. This direct final 

rule does not impose any requirements 

on State and local governments. Thus, 

Executive Order 13132 does not apply 

to this rule. 

F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation 

and Coordination With Indian Tribal 

Governments 

This action does not have tribal 

implications, as specified in Executive 

Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 

2000). This direct final rule imposes no 

requirements on tribal governments; 

thus, Executive Order 13175 does not 

apply to this action. 

G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of 

Children From Environmental Health 

and Safety Risks 

EPA interprets Executive Order 13045 

(62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997) as 

applying to those regulatory actions that 

concern health or safety risks, such that 

the analysis required under section 5– 

501 of the Order has the potential to 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with RULES
31320 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 106 / Thursday, June 3, 2010 / Rules and Regulations 

influence the regulation. This action is 

not subject to EO 13045 because the 

final rule is based solely on technology 

performance. 

H. Executive Order 13211: Actions 

Concerning Regulations That 

Significantly Affect Energy Supply, 

Distribution, or Use 

This direct final rule is not a 

‘‘significant energy action’’ as defined in 

Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, 

May 22, 2001) because it is not likely to 

have a significant adverse effect on the 

supply, distribution, or use of energy. 

I. National Technology Transfer and 

Advancement Act 

Section 12(d) of the National 

Technology Transfer and Advancement 

Act of 1995 (‘‘NTTAA’’), Public Law 

104–113 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) directs 

EPA to use voluntary consensus 

standards in its regulatory activities, 

unless to do so would be inconsistent 

with applicable law or otherwise 

impractical. Voluntary consensus 

standards are technical standards (e.g., 

materials specifications, test methods, 

sampling procedures, and business 

practices) that are developed or adopted 

by voluntary consensus standards 

bodies. NTTAA directs EPA to provide 

Congress, through OMB, explanations 

when the Agency decides not to use 

available and applicable voluntary 

consensus standards. 

J. Executive Order 12898: Federal 

Actions To Address Environmental 

Justice in Minority Populations and 

Low-Income Populations 

Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, 

February 16, 1994) establishes Federal 

executive policy on environmental 

justice. Its main provision directs 

Federal agencies, to the greatest extent 

practicable and permitted by law, to 

make environmental justice part of their 

mission by identifying and addressing, 

as appropriate, disproportionately high 

and adverse human health or 

environmental effects of their programs, 

policies, and activities on minority 

populations and low-income 

populations in the United States. 

EPA has determined that this direct 

final rule would not have 

disproportionately high and adverse 

human health or environmental effects 

on minority or low-income populations 

because this rule will not change the 

level of health protection the rule 

provides to all affected populations, 

including any minority or low-income 

population. 

K. Congressional Review Act 

The Congressional Review Act, 5 

U.S.C. 801, et seq., as added by the 

Small Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides 

that before a rule may take effect, the 

agency promulgating the rule must 

submit a rule report, which includes a 

copy of the rule, to each House of 

Congress and to the Comptroller General 

of the United States. EPA will submit a 

report containing this direct final rule 

and other required information to the 

U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of 

Representatives, and the Comptroller 

General of the United States prior to 

publication of this final rule in the 

Federal Register. A major rule cannot 

take effect until 60 days after it is 

published in the Federal Register. This 

direct final rule is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as 

defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). This direct 

final rule will be effective on September 

16, 2010. 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 63 

Environmental protection, 

Administrative practice and procedure, 

Air pollution control, Hazardous 

substances, Intergovernmental relations, 

Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements. 

Dated: May 27, 2010. 

Lisa P. Jackson, 

Administrator. 

■ For the reasons set out in the 

preamble, title 40, chapter I, part 63, 

subpart CCCCCCC of the Code of 

Federal Regulations is amended as 

follows: 

PART 63—[AMENDED] 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 63 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401, et seq. 

Subpart CCCCCCC—[Amended] 

■ 2. Section 63.11607 is amended by 

revising the definition of Material 

containing HAP to read as follows: 

§ 63.11607 What definitions apply to this 

subpart? 

* * * * * 

Material containing HAP means a 

material containing benzene, methylene 

chloride, or compounds of cadmium, 

chromium, lead, and/or nickel, in 

amounts greater than or equal to 0.1 

percent by weight for carcinogens, as 

defined by the Occupational Safety and 

Health Administration at 29 CFR 

1910.1200(d)(4), or 1.0 percent by 

weight for non-carcinogens, as shown in 

formulation data provided by the 

manufacturer or supplier, such as the 

Material Safety Data Sheet for the 

material. Benzene and methylene 

chloride are volatile HAP. Compounds 

of cadmium, chromium, lead and/or 

nickel are metal HAP. 

* * * * * 

[FR Doc. 2010–13384 Filed 6–2–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION 

46 CFR Part 501 

[Docket No. 10–04] 

RIN 3072–AC37 

Agency Reorganization and 

Delegations of Authority; Correction 

AGENCY: Federal Maritime Commission. 

ACTION: Correcting amendments. 

SUMMARY: The Federal Maritime 

Commission (FMC or Commission) 

published in the Federal Register of 

May 26, 2010, the Final Rule for the 

reorganization of the Commission. The 

reference to the Commission’s Office of 

Consumer Affairs and Dispute 

Resolution Services was inadvertently 

omitted from Lines of Responsibility 

and Functions of the Chairman. This 

document corrects the omission. This 

correction also adds the legend for the 

Commission’s Organization Chart. 

DATES: Effective June 3, 2010. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Rebecca A. Fenneman, General Counsel, 

Federal Maritime Commission, 800 

North Capitol Street, NW., Washington, 

DC 20573, (202) 523–5740, 

GeneralCounsel@fmc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FMC 

published a Final Rule in the Federal 

Register on May 26, 2010 (75 FR 29451) 

concerning the reorganization of the 

Commission. The reference to the 

Commission’s Office of Consumer 

Affairs and Dispute Resolution Services 

was inadvertently omitted from the 

Lines of Responsibility and Functions of 

the Chairman in sections 501.4 and 

501.5. This document corrects the 

omission. This correction also adds the 

legend for the Commission’s 

Organization Chart in Appendix A to 

Part 501 to assist in the understanding 

of the chart. 

List of Subjects in 46 CFR Part 501 

Administrative practice and 

procedure, Authority delegations, 

Organization and functions, Seals and 

insignia. 

■ For the reasons stated in the 

supplementary information, the Federal 

Maritime Commission amends 46 CFR 

Part 501 as follows. 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with RULES