alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 31.3 CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
RULES 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e),
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Ira D. Kaplan, Chief Financial Officer of Claires Stores, Inc. (the
Company), certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant
as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
and we have:  a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;  b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in
the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting. June 10, 2004
    /s/ Ira D. KaplanIra D. KaplanChief Financial Officer
#### 1511.011-75 Working files.

Contracting Officers shall insert the contract clause at 1552.211-75 in all applicable EPA contracts where accurate working files on all work documentation is required in the performance of the contract.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Floyd Edgar Martin, Appellant.

Order unanimously affirmed. (See *People*v. *Liss,*14 N Y 2d 570.) (Appeal from order of Wayne Trial Term denying, without a hearing, motion to vacate a judgment of conviction for murder, first degree, rendered November 7, 1946.) Present—1 Bastow, J. P., Goldman, Henry, Noonan and Del Vecchio, JJ.
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 590 

To authorize the Secretary of Agriculture to maintain or replace certain 

facilities and structures for commercial recreation services at Smith 

Gulch in Idaho, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 9, 2017 

Mr. RISCH (for himself and Mr. CRAPO) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural 

Resources 

A BILL 

To authorize the Secretary of Agriculture to maintain or 

replace certain facilities and structures for commercial 

recreation services at Smith Gulch in Idaho, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. MAINTENANCE OR REPLACEMENT OF FACILI4 TIES AND STRUCTURES AT SMITH GULCH. 

5 The authorization of the Secretary of Agriculture to 

6 maintain or replace facilities or structures for commercial 

7 recreation services at Smith Gulch under section 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 590 IS

1 3(a)(24)(D) of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (16 U.S.C. 

2 1274(a)(24)(D))— 

3 (1) may include improvements or replacements 

4 that the Secretary of Agriculture determines— 

5 (A) are consistent with section 9(b) of the 

6 Central Idaho Wilderness Act of 1980 (16 

7 U.S.C. 1281 note; Public Law 96–312); and 

8 (B) would reduce the impact of the com9 mercial recreation facilities or services on wil10 derness or wild and scenic river resources and 

11 values; and 

12 (2) authorizes the Secretary of Agriculture to 

13 consider including, as appropriate— 

14 (A) hydroelectric generators and associated 

15 electrical transmission facilities; 

16 (B) water pumps for fire suppression; 

17 (C) transitions from propane to electrical 

18 lighting; 

19 (D) solar energy systems; 

20 (E) 6-volt or 12-volt battery banks for 

21 power storage; and 

22 (F) other improvements or replacements 

23 which are consistent with this section that the 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 590 IS

1 Secretary of Agriculture determines appro2 priate. 

Æ 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Larry E. Finger, the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Federal Realty Investment Trust (the Company), has executed this certification in connection with the filing with the Securities and
Exchange Commission of the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2007 (the Report). The undersigned hereby certifies that:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|               |  |  |  |                                                                                                     
|-------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|               |  | 
|August 1, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/ LARRY E. FINGER                                                                                 
|               |  |  |  | Larry E. Finger, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting
Officer)
**Exhibit 23**

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 

We consent to the incorporation by referencein this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of Tellabs, Inc. of our reports dated February 26, 2009, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Tellabs, Inc. and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Tellabs,Inc., included in the 2008 Annual Report to Shareholders of Tellabs, Inc. 

Our audits also included the financial statement schedule of Tellabs, Inc.listed in Item 15 (a). This schedule is the responsibility of Tellabs, Inc.’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our audits. In our opinion, as to which the date is February 26, 2009, the financialstatement schedule referred to above, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein. 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 No. 33-45788, 33-48972, 33-55487, 333-49557, 333-83509, 333-87637, 333-95135,333-56546, 333-81360, 333-107457, 333-122712 and 333-128076, and Form S-4 No. 333-116794) and related prospectuses of our reports dated February 26, 2009, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Tellabs, Inc. and theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Tellabs, Inc. incorporated herein by reference, and our report included in the preceding paragraph with respect to the financial statement schedule of Tellabs, Inc. included in thisAnnual Report (Form 10-K) of Tellabs, Inc. for the year ended January 2, 2009. 

 

/s/ Ernst & Young, LLP 

Chicago, Illinois 

February 26, 2009
Fiscal Year 2012 Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies - DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

FY 2012 Title I

LEA ID District Allocation*

1100030 District of Columbia Public Schools 46,617,802

1199999 PART D SUBPART 2 0

* Actual amounts received by LEAs will be smaller than shown here due to State-level adjustments to Federal Title I allocations. States adjust

 allocations, for example, to reflect LEA boundary changes or the creation of new LEAs, including charter school LEAs, that are not accounted

 for in the statutory calculations. States also are permitted to reserve, for administration, up to 1 percent of the allocations they would receive

 if $14 billion were appropriated and generally must reserve 4 percent in fiscal year 2012 for school improvement activities. These 

 adjustments will reduce the actual amounts available.
```

[110th Congress Public Law 268]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ268.110]

[[Page 122 STAT. 2468]]

Public Law 110-268
110th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
  19101 Cortez Boulevard in Brooksville, Florida, as the ``Cody Grater 
     Post Office Building''. <<NOTE: July 15, 2008 -  [H.R. 5168]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. CODY GRATER POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 19101 Cortez Boulevard in Brooksville, Florida, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Cody Grater Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Cody Grater 
Post Office Building''.

    Approved July 15, 2008.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 5168:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 154 (2008):
            Apr. 1, considered and passed House.
            June 27, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
## *A r c h i v e d  I n f o r m a t i o n*

# RICHARD W. RILEY

## U. S. SECRETARY OF EDUCATION 

## 

The *Christian Science Monitor* says that many Americans regard Dick Riley as "one of the great statesmen of education in this century." David Broder, columnist for *The Washington Post*, has called him one of the "most decent and honorable people in public life." And when Riley was governor of South Carolina, he was so popular that the people amended their constitution to enable him to run for a second term.

Wherever he goes, Richard Wilson Riley--U. S. Secretary of Education and grandfather of ten--wins respect for his integrity, principled leadership, commitment to children, and passion for education. 

President Clinton chose Dick Riley to be Secretary in December 1992 after Riley won national recognition for his highly successful effort to improve education in South Carolina. During the President’s first term, Riley helped launch historic initiatives to raise academic standards; to improve instruction for the poor and disadvantaged; to expand grants and loan programs to help more Americans go to college; to prepare young people for the world of work; and to improve teaching. He also helped to create the Partnership for Family Involvement in Education, which today includes over 4,000 groups.

Riley gets things done by reaching out to all citizens. He prefers partnership to partisanship. His quiet, self-effacing style "can drive impatient, assertive young Washington movers and shakers crazy," the *National Journal* has written. "He doesn’t grab headlines or clamor for credit... But, inevitably, Riley reaches his goal."

Riley’s efforts were so successful that President Clinton asked him to stay on in his second term to lead the President’s national crusade for excellence in education. Riley and the President agree that education must be America’s number one priority in the years ahead. Already in the second term, Riley has helped win an historic ruling by the F.C.C. to give schools and libraries deep discounts for Internet access and telecommunications services and helped win major improvements in the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act.

Riley’s goals now include helping all children to master the basics of reading and math; making schools safer; reducing class sizes in grades 1-3 by helping states and schools to hire 100,000 more good teachers; modernizing and building new schools to meet record-breaking student enrollments and to help students learn to use computers; and expanding after-school programs.

Dick Riley was born in Greenville County, S. C., on Jan. 2, 1933. He was graduated *cum laude* from Furman University in 1954 and served as an officer on a U. S. Navy minesweeper. In 1959, Riley received a law degree from the University of South Carolina. He was a state representative and state senator from 1963-1977 and was elected governor in 1978 and reelected in 1982. Riley is married to the former Ann Osteen Yarborough. They have four children.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DESHA M. CARTER,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

M. YARBOROUGH; et al.,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 10-55015

D.C. No. 2:05-cv-06502-PA-PJW

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Percy Anderson, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 19, 2011** 

Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges.

Desha M. Carter, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district

court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging various

constitutional violations. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We

review de novo summary judgment on the basis of qualified immunity, Galen v.

FILED

JAN 04 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 10-55015

County of Los Angeles, 477 F.3d 652, 658 (9th Cir. 2007), and we affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment on the basis of

qualified immunity on Carter’s denial of outdoor exercise claim because Carter

failed to raise a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether it would be clear to a

reasonable officer that restricting Carter’s outdoor exercise during the prison

security lockdown violated his constitutional rights. See Norwood v. Vance, 591

F.3d 1062, 1068-70 (9th Cir. 2010) (prison officials entitled to qualified immunity

on denial of outdoor exercise claim because a reasonable officer could have

believed that restricting outdoor exercise during prison security lockdown was

constitutional), cert. denied, 131 S. Ct. 1465 (2011).

The district court properly granted summary judgment on Carter’s access-tocourt claim because Carter failed to raise a genuine dispute of material fact as to

whether the warden knew that the prison staff was not following the directive to

provide legal materials to the prisoners with court deadlines. See Taylor v. List,

880 F.2d 1040, 1045 (9th Cir. 1989) (no respondeat superior liability under § 1983;

plaintiff must show defendant’s personal involvement in alleged violations).

Carter’s remaining contentions are unpersuasive.

AFFIRMED.
### §6951. Under Secretary of Agriculture for Food, Nutrition, and Consumer Services

#### (a) Authorization

The Secretary is authorized to establish in the Department the position of Under Secretary of Agriculture for Food, Nutrition, and Consumer Services.

#### (b) Confirmation required

If the Secretary establishes the position of Under Secretary of Agriculture for Food, Nutrition, and Consumer Services authorized under subsection (a), the Under Secretary shall be appointed by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate.

#### (c) Functions of Under Secretary

#### (1) Principal functions

Upon establishment, the Secretary shall delegate to the Under Secretary of Agriculture for Food, Nutrition, and Consumer Services those functions under the jurisdiction of the Department that are related to food, nutrition, and consumer services (except as provided in section 6981(b)(1) of this title).

#### (2) Additional functions

The Under Secretary of Agriculture for Food, Nutrition, and Consumer Services shall perform such other functions as may be required by law or prescribed by the Secretary.

#### (d) Succession

Any official who is serving as Assistant Secretary of Agriculture for Food and Consumer Services on October 13, 1994, and who was appointed by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, shall not be required to be reappointed under subsection (b) to the successor position authorized under subsection (a) if the Secretary establishes the position, and the official occupies the new position, within 180 days after October 13, 1994 (or such later date set by the Secretary if litigation delays rapid succession).

(Pub. L. 103–354, title II, §241, Oct. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 3222.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section is comprised of section 241 of Pub. L. 103–354. Subsec. (e) of section 241 of Pub. L. 103–354 amended section 5314 of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.
Case: 1:12-cv-01555 Document #: 9 Filed: 03/05/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:15
#### KNIGHT, Respondent, v. LONG ISLAND R. CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

November 25, 1903.)

Action by Thomas G. Knight against the Long Island Railroad Company.

No opinion. Judgment of the Municipal Court unanimously affirmed, with costs.
### §7917. Relation to remaining payment authority under production flexibility contracts

#### (a) Termination of superseded payment authority

Notwithstanding section 7213(a)(7) of this title or any other provision of law, the Secretary shall not make payments for fiscal year 2002 after May 13, 2002, under a production flexibility contract entered into under section 7211 of this title unless requested by the producer that is a party to the contract.

#### (b) Contract payments made before enactment

If a producer receives all or any portion of the payment authorized for fiscal year 2002 under a production flexibility contract, the Secretary shall reduce the amount of the direct payment otherwise due the producer for the 2002 crop year under section 7913 of this title by the amount of the fiscal year 2002 payment received by the producer under the production flexibility contract.

(Pub. L. 107–171, title I, §1107, May 13, 2002, 116 Stat. 154.)
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 782 Referred in House (RFH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 782

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 20, 2017

               Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To reauthorize the National Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force 
                    Program, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Providing Resources, Officers, and 
Technology To Eradicate Cyber Threats to Our Children Act of 2017'' or 
the ``PROTECT Our Children Act of 2017''.

SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF THE NATIONAL INTERNET CRIMES AGAINST 
              CHILDREN TASK FORCE PROGRAM.

    Title I of the PROTECT Our Children Act of 2008 (42 U.S.C. 17601 et 
seq.) is amended--
            (1) in section 105(h) (42 U.S.C. 17615(h)), by striking 
        ``2016'' and inserting ``2022''; and
            (2) in section 107(a)(10) (42 U.S.C. 17617(a)(10)), by 
        striking ``fiscal year 2018'' and inserting ``each of fiscal 
        years 2018 through 2022''.

            Passed the Senate June 15, 2017.

            Attest:

                                                JULIE E. ADAMS,

                                                             Secretary.
```
-88 -86 -84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74

 34

 36

 38

 40

 42

★

▲ ▲

▲

▲

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 1000

18 12 06 00

06/22

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 22 Jun 06

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.90 N 76.65 W Meters AGL