alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §1421b. Costs of production

Congress finds that, to improve the accuracy of commodity program benefit forecasts, the Secretary of Agriculture should designate a single organization to manage its commodity program forecasting and establish a quality control program to—

(1) systematically identify the source of forecasting errors;

(2) maintain records of data used for supply and demand forecasts;

(3) document its forecasting methods; and

(4) correct weaknesses in its various forecasting components.

(Pub. L. 101–624, title XXV, §2512, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 4073; Pub. L. 104–66, title I, §1011(b), Dec. 21, 1995, 109 Stat. 709.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Food, Agriculture, Conservation, and Trade Act of 1990, and not as part of the Agricultural Act of 1949 which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of the 1949 Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1421 of this title and Tables.

#### Amendments

1995—Pub. L. 104–66 struck out subsec. (a) designation and heading "Improving accuracy of commodity program budget forecasts" before "Congress finds that", and struck out subsec. (b) "Return on assets" which read as follows: "The Secretary of Agriculture shall annually publish a report analyzing the return on assets resulting from the production of upland cotton, rice, wheat, corn, oats, barley, grain sorghum, soybeans, peanuts, sugar from sugar beets, and raw sugar from sugar cane. In conducting this analysis, the Secretary shall consider returns from agricultural price support programs, the effects of agricultural price support programs on cost of production, the factors currently used in Department of Agriculture cost of production data, current value of land, and any other information that he considers necessary to reflect accurately return on the production of such crops."
1503.104-4 Disclosure, protection, and marking of contractor bid or proposal information and source selection information. ( a ) ( 1 ) The Chief of the Contracting Office (CCO) is the designated official to make the decision whether support contractors are used in proposal evaluation (as authorized at FAR 15.305(c) and restricted at FAR 37.203(d)).
( 2 ) The following written certification and agreement shall be obtained from non-Government evaluator prior to the release of any proposal to that evaluator: “Certification on the Use and Disclosure of Proposals” RFP #: Offeror: 1. I hereby certify that to the best of my knowledge and belief, no conflict of interest exists that may diminish my capacity to perform an impartial, technically sound, objective review of this proposal(s) or otherwise result in a biased opinion or unfair competitive advantage. 2. I agree to use any proposal information only for evaluation purposes. I agree not to copy any information from the proposal(s), to use my best effort to safeguard such information physically, and not to disclose the contents of nor release any information relating to the proposal(s) to anyone outside of the evaluation team assembled for this acquisition or individuals designated by the Contracting Officer. 3. I agree to return to the Government all copies of proposals, as well as any abstracts, upon completion of the evaluation. Name and Organization: Date of Execution:
(End of certificate)
( b ) Information contained in proposals will be protected and disclosed to the extent permitted by law, and in accordance with FAR 3.104-4, 15.207, and Agency procedures at 40 CFR part 2.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                          0000032284
<NAME>                                         Orion Diversified Technologies

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              APR-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 MAY-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   OCT-31-1998
<CASH>                                              0
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    0
<PP&E>                                              0
<DEPRECIATION>                                      0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         129,612
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                       18,469
<OTHER-SE>                                   (148,081)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        0
<SALES>                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    0
<CGS>                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  200
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (200)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 0
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (200)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .00



</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Highway Administration

# AGENCY:

Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), DOT.

# ACTION:

Rescind notice of intent.

# SUMMARY:

The FHWA is issuing this notice to advise the public that effective immediately, we are rescinding a Notice of Intent (NOI) to prepare a Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (SEIS) for the 2002 LA 1 Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) in Lafourche Parish, LA.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Charles Bolinger, Division Administrator, Louisiana Division, Federal Highway Administration, 5304 Flanders Drive, Suite A, Baton Rouge, LA 70808 Telephone: 225.757.7600.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The FHWA, in cooperation with the Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development (LADOTD), issued a NOI on March 15, 2017, to prepare a Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (SEIS) to study local access modifications and right-of-way impacts to roadway approaches beyond the initial Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) project limits.

The FHWA has determined, in conjunction with LADOTD, the NOI for the SEIS shall be rescinded due to the numerous impacts to traffic and right-of-way beyond the initial project limits identified in the FEIS. The project layout as previously identified in the FEIS will remain as the selected alternative.

Issued on: January 11, 2021.

Charles Bolinger,

Division Administrator, Louisiana Division, Baton Rouge, Louisiana. 

[FR Doc. 2021-00683 Filed 1-13-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-22-P
### IN THE UNI TED STAT ES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCU IT

N o
. 1 0

- 4 0 1 9 6 C o n f e r e n c e C a l e n d a r

U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A , P l a i n t i f f

- A p p e l l e e

v
. E F R A I N H E R N A N D E Z

- G O N Z A L E Z , D e f e n d a n t

- A p p e l l a n t

A p p e a l f

r o m t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s D i s t r i c t C o u r t f o r t h e S o u t h e r n D i s t r i c t o f T e x a s U S D C N o
. 7 : 0 9

- C R

- 1 5 2 0

- 1

B e f o r e H I G G I N B O T H A M , G A R Z A , a n d E L R O D , C i r c u i t J u d g e s
. P E R C U R I A M : *
T h e F e d e r a l P u b l i c D e f e n d e r a p p o i n t e d t o r e p r e s e n t E f r a i n H e r n a n d e z G o n z a l e z h a s m o v e d f o r l e a v e t o w i t h d r a w a n d h a s f i l e d a b r i e f i n a c c o r d a n c e

w i t h A n d e r s v
. C a l i f o r n i a , 3 8 6 U

. S

. 7 3 8 ( 1 9 6 7 )

. H e r n a n d e z - G o n z a l e z h a s n o t f i l e d a r e s p o n s e
. O u r i n d e p e n d e n t r e v i e w o f t h e r e c o r d a n d c o u n s e l ’ s b r i e f d i s c l o s e s n o n o n f

r i v o l o u s i s s u e f

o r a p p e a l

. A c c o r d i n g l y , c o u n s e l ’ s m o t i o n f o r l e a v e t o w i t h d r a w i s G R A N T E D , c o u n s e l i s e x c u s e d f r o m f u r t h e r r e s p o n s i b i l i t i e s h e r e i n , a n d t h e A P P E A L I S D I S M I S S E D

. S e e 5 T H C I R

. R

. 4 2

. 2

. U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s

F i ft h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D Februa ry 15 , 20 11 Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Purs uant to 5 T H C I R

. R. 47.5 , the cour t has d ete rm ined t hat this op inion sho uld not * be publ ish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t for th in 5 T H C I R

. R. 47.5 .4. Case: 10-40196 Document: 00511382105 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/15/2011
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 12 (Thursday, January 21, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 6330]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-01172]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION


Revised Jurisdictional Thresholds for Section 8 of the Clayton 
Act

AGENCY: Federal Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Trade Commission announces the revised thresholds 
for interlocking directorates required by the 1990 amendment of Section 
8 of the Clayton Act. Section 8 prohibits, with certain exceptions, one 
person from serving as a director or officer of two competing 
corporations if two thresholds are met. Competitor corporations are 
covered by Section 8 if each one has capital, surplus, and undivided 
profits aggregating more than $10,000,000, with the exception that no 
corporation is covered if the competitive sales of either corporation 
are less than $1,000,000. Section 8(a)(5) requires the Federal Trade 
Commission to revise those thresholds annually, based on the change in 
gross national product. The new thresholds, which take effect 
immediately, are $37,382,000 for Section 8(a)(1), and $3,738,200 for 
Section 8(a)(2)(A).

DATES: January 21, 2021.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Chris Grengs (202-326-2612), Bureau of 
Competition, Office of Policy and Coordination.

    Authority: 15 U.S.C. 19(a)(5)

April J. Tabor,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-01172 Filed 1-19-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6750-01-P
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 4.2

Eastern Division

Sourcebooks, Inc.

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:11−cv−07738

Honorable Amy J. St. Eve

Anita Clenney

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Monday, December 12, 2011:

 MINUTE entry before Honorable Amy J. St. Eve:Status hearing held on

12/12/2011 and continued to 2/21/2012 at 08:30 AM. Per the joint status report, parties

agree that discovery is limited. Rule 26(a)(1) disclosures and written discovery should be

issued by 12/28/11. Fact discovery should be completed by 3/30/12. Plaintiff's expert

report by 4/30/12. Defendant's expert report by 5/30/12. All expert discovery should be

completed by 7/30/12. Dispositive motions with supporting memoranda should be filed by

9/4/12. Plaintiff's motion to strike and motion to dismiss count 1 of defendant's

counterclaims should be filed by 12/13/11. Response by 1/6/12. Reply by 1/20/12.

Plaintiff to answer or otherwise plead to count 3 of the counterclaims and third−party

complaint by 1/6/12. Response by 1/27/12. Reply by 2/10/12. Parties are directed to meet

and confer pursuant to Rule 26(f) and exhaust all settlement possibilities prior to the next

status hearing. Mailed notice(kef, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:11-cv-07738 Document #: 16 Filed: 12/12/11 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:121
# December 2020 FOIA Log
144 FY 2021 AGENCY FINANCIAL REPORT | U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

The Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act Improvements Act of 2015, as amended, requires agencies to make 

regular and consistent inflationary adjustments of civil monetary penalties to maintain their deterrent effect. To 

improve compliance with the act, and in response to multiple audits and recommendations, agencies should report annually 

in the Other Information section the most recent inflationary adjustments to civil monetary penalties to ensure penalty 

adjustments are both timely and accurate.

Location for Penalty Update Details:

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2021/02/03/2021-02231/adjustment-of-civil-monetary-penalties-for-inflation

Table 15

Penalty Authority Date of Previous 

Adjustment

Date of Current 

Adjustment

Current Penalty 

Level

Failure to provide information for cost of higher education 20 USC 

1015(c)(5) 1-14-20 2-03-21 $ 39,693

Failure to provide information regarding teacherpreparation programs20 USC 

1022d(a)(3) 1-14-20 2-03-21 33,062

Violation of Title IV of the HEA 20 USC 1082(g) 1-14-20 2-03-21 59,017

Violation of Title IV of the HEA 20 USC 

1094(c)(3)(B) 1-14-20 2-03-21 59,017

Failure to disclose information to minor children and parents 20 USC 

1228c(c)(2)(E) 1-14-20 2-03-21 1,742

Improper lobbying for government grants and contracts

31 USC 

1352(c)(1) and 

c(2)(A)

1-14-20 2-03-21

20,731

 to

207,314

False claims and statements 31 USC 3802(a)(1) 

and (a)(2) 1-14-20 2-03-21 11,803

Civil Monetary Penalty Adjustment for Inflation
### §284. Eradication and control of undesirable species and subspecies

#### (a) Operations in United States

The Secretary of Agriculture either independently or in cooperation with States or political subdivisions thereof, farmers' associations, and similar organizations and individuals, is authorized to carry out operations or measures in the United States to eradicate, suppress, control, and to prevent or retard the spread of undesirable species and subspecies of honeybees.

#### (b) Cooperation with certain foreign governments; measure and character; consultation with Secretary of State

The Secretary of Agriculture is authorized to cooperate with the Governments of Canada, Mexico, Guatemala, Belize, Honduras, El Salvador, Nicaragua, Costa Rica, Panama, and Colombia, or the local authorities thereof, in carrying out necessary research, surveys, and control operations in those countries in connection with the eradication, suppression, control, and prevention or retardation of the spread of undesirable species and subspecies of honeybees, including but not limited to Apis mellifera adansonii, commonly known as the African or Brazilian honeybee. The measure and character of cooperation carried out under this subsection on the part of such countries, including the expenditure or use of funds appropriated pursuant to this chapter, shall be such as may be prescribed by the Secretary of Agriculture. Arrangements for the cooperation authorized by this subsection shall be made through and in consultation with the Secretary of State.

#### (c) Responsibility for authority to carry out operations

In performing the operations or measures authorized in this chapter, the cooperating foreign country, State, or local agency shall be responsible for the authority to carry out such operations or measures on all lands and properties within the foreign country or State, other than those owned or controlled by the Federal Government of the United States, and for such other facilities and means as in the discretion of the Secretary of Agriculture are necessary.

(Aug. 31, 1922, ch. 301, §3, as added Pub. L. 94–319, §3, June 25, 1976, 90 Stat. 709.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Indemnification for Beekeepers

Pub. L. 91–524, title VIII, §804, Nov. 30, 1970, 84 Stat. 1382, as amended by Pub. L. 93–86, §1(27)(A), Aug. 10, 1973, 87 Stat. 237; Pub. L. 95–113, title II, §207, Sept. 29, 1977, 91 Stat. 921, authorized the Secretary of Agriculture to make indemnity payments, based on net loss, to beekeepers who through no fault of their own lost honey bees after Jan. 1, 1967, as a result of utilization of economic poisons, registered and approved for use by the Federal Government, near or adjacent to the beehives, with this section expired after Sept. 30, 1981.
### §3200. Matching funds

No funds in excess of $100,000, exclusive of the funds provided for research on specific national or regional animal health and disease problems under the provisions of section 3196 of this title, shall be paid by the Federal Government to any State under subsection (c) of section 3195 of this title to carry out subsection (a) of such section during any fiscal year in excess of the amount from non-Federal sources made available to and budgeted for expenditure by eligible institutions in the State during the same fiscal year for animal health and disease research. The Secretary is authorized to make such payments in excess of $100,000 on the certificate of the appropriate official of the eligible institution having charge of the animal health and disease research for which such payments are to be made. If any eligible institution certified for receipt of matching funds fails to make available and budget for expenditure for animal health and disease research in any fiscal year sums at least equal to the amount for which it is certified, the difference between the Federal matching funds available and the funds made available to and budgeted for expenditure by the eligible institution shall be reapportioned by the Secretary among other eligible institutions of the same State, if there are any which qualify therefor, and, if there are none, the Secretary shall reapportion such difference among the other States.

(Pub. L. 95–113, title XIV, §1438, Sept. 29, 1977, 91 Stat. 1005; Pub. L. 113–79, title VII, §7111(b)(3)(E), Feb. 7, 2014, 128 Stat. 874.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2014—Pub. L. 113–79 substituted "under subsection (c) of section 3195 of this section to carry out subsection (a) of such section" for "under this subchapter".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Oct. 1, 1977, see section 1901 of Pub. L. 95–113, set out as an Effective Date of 1977 Amendment note under section 1307 of this title.
#### Margaret Valentin et al., Respondents, v Zinoviy Zaltsman et al., Appellants.

[835 NYS2d 298]—

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Ruditzky, J.), dated May 17, 2006, which, in effect, denied their motion, in effect, pursuant to CPLR 306-b to dismiss the complaint, and granted the plaintiffs’ cross motion pursuant to CPLR 306-b to extend their time to serve the defendants with process.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the facts and as a matter of discretion, with costs, the defendants’ motion, in effect, pursuant to CPLR 306-b to dismiss the complaint is granted, and the plaintiffs’ cross motion pursuant to CPLR 306-b to extend their time to serve the defendants with process is denied.

The plaintiffs acknowledge that no attempt to serve the defendants was made within the 120-day period after the filing of the summons and complaint. This fact, in and of itself, establishes that no good cause was shown for an extension of time pursuant to CPLR 306-b to serve the defendants with process *(see Riccio v Ghulam,*29 AD3d 558, 560 [2006]).

An extension of time pursuant to CPLR 306-b may be granted in the interest of justice without a showing of “reasonably diligent efforts at service as a threshold matter” *(Leader v Maroney, Ponzini & Spencer,*97 NY2d 95, 105 [2001]). However, in this case, the plaintiffs, as part of a pattern of an extreme lack of diligence, and without any justification, failed to move for an extension of time until after the defendants raised the defense of untimely service *(see Riccio v Ghulam, supra*at 560). Under all of the circumstances of this case, granting the plaintiffs an extension of time pursuant to CPLR 306-b was an improvident exercise of discretion. Crane, J.P., Krausman, Goldstein and Dillon, JJ., concur.
#### 1239.106-70 Contract clauses.

The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 1252.239-70, Security Requirements for Unclassified Information Technology Resources, and the clause at 1252.239-71, Information Technology Security Plan and Accreditation, in all solicitations and contracts exceeding the micro-purchase threshold that include information technology services.