alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.1**
**CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**
I, Alan Rosskamm, certify that:
1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Jo-Ann Stores,Inc. (the “registrant”); 2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period coveredby this report; 3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4) The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared; b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’ssecond fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and
5) The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.   Date: September 9, 2004 /s/ Alan Rosskamm  By: Alan Rosskamm President and Chief ExecutiveOfficer
Electronic Notification Option for Grant Awards

If your application is successful, we notify your U.S. Representative and U.S. Senators and send 

you a Grant Award Notification (GAN); OR we may send you an e-mail containing a link to 

access G5, the Department’s Grant Management System. The email will be sent to both the 

project director and certifying representative in order for them to view and print the Adobe 

Acrobat version of the electronically signed GAN. If neither the project director nor certifying 

representative is registered in G5, they will immediately be prompted to register once the link 

is accessed. The electronic signature and issuance of the GAN makes it crucial that your 

application include correct email addresses for both the project director and certifying 

representative.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                        47,934,684
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                   4,133,105
<MORTGAGE>                                   9,809,379
<REAL-ESTATE>                                7,808,255
<TOTAL-INVEST>                              75,183,298
<CASH>                                       3,301,084
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                   0
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                       4,277,560
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             124,709,503
<POLICY-LOSSES>                             74,341,087
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                  0
<POLICY-OTHER>                                 716,370
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                        1,904,605
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                             12,489,930
<COMMON>                                     9,214,831
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                  14,253,197
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               124,709,503
<PREMIUMS>                                   5,666,436
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                          7,517,014
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                             289,543
<OTHER-INCOME>                              16,449,617
<BENEFITS>                                   6,340,464
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                  1,239,918
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                                 0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,376,603
<INCOME-TAX>                                   139,458
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,237,145
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,237,145
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.32
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.32
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
(February 17, 1961)

#### In the Matter of Herbert Severin v. Robert E. Herman, as State Rent Administrator.

Motion for a stay granted on condition that the appellant procures the record on appeal and appellant’s points to be served and filed on or before February 28, 1961, with notice of argument for the April 1961 Term of this court, said appeal to be argued or submitted when reached. The stay contained in the order to show cause, dated February 1, 1961, is continued pending the hearing and determination of the appeal. Concur — Valente, J. P., McNally, Stevens, Eager and Steuer, JJ.
#### In the Matter of Dorothy A. Narel, Respondent, v. Harriet A. Kerr, Appellant.

Memorandum by the Court. In a proceeding instituted by her opponent pursuant to section 330 of the Election Law the successful candidate for member of the State Committee of the Democratic party for the County of Ulster at a primary election held on June 2, 1964 appeals from an order of the Supreme Court at Special Term directing the Board of Canvassers of that county to open the ballot boxes, to inspect, reeanvass and recount the paper ballots cast in the election and to report its findings to the court in writing which “shall be the final determination as to said Primary Election”. It is conceded that the proceeding was untimely under subdivision 2 of section 330 of the Election Law. As the basis for its action Special Term relied on the provisions of subdivision 5 which in a proceeding instituted in the manner and within the time prescribed by statute authorizes the Supreme Court or a Justice thereof summarily to determine any question of law or fact arising as to the canvass of returns by a County Board of Canvassers and empowers the court or Justice to “direct a reeanvass or the correction of an error or the performance of any duty imposed by law". This subdivision has been construed to have “no reference to the reeanvass or recount of ballots.” *(Matter of Oliver,*234 App. Div. 170, 174; *Matter of Medbury,*234 App. Div. 26; *Matter of Mullen*v. *Heffernan,*193 Misc. *980334, 338, affd. 274 App. Div. 972, affid. 298 N. Y. 785.) There is no inherent power to' extend a judicial review beyond that provided by the statute. *(Matter of Macy*v. *Clayton,*277 App. Div. 1131, mot. for lv. to app. den. 302 N. Y. 950; *Matter of Hogan*v. *Supreme Court,*281 *N.*Y. 572, *576; Matter of Tamney*v. *Atkins,*209 N. Y. 202.) It is clear that Special Term proceeded in excess of its jurisdiction. Nor is there any showing that petitioner' was entitled to the relief sought under subdivision 4 of section 330. Order reversed, on the law and the facts, and petition dismissed, without costs. Gibson, P. J., Reynolds, Taylor, Aulisi and Hamm, JJ., concur.
#### 1832.1009 Title.

In accordance with 42 U.S.C. 2465d, NASA shall not take title to launch vehicles under contracts for launch services unless one of the exceptions in the law applies. However, the law does not eliminate NASA's right to take title to other property acquired or produced by the contractor under a contract containing a title provision.
'A Want to know 

more about College? 

your dreams 

Change the 

ww.college.gov Youl!l

 II
## SERVED FEBRUARY 24, 2010

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC II ") ') .Jl


### IN THE MAITER OF 

### AVIATION SPECIALTIES UNLIMITED FAA DOCKET NO. CP09NM0014 (Civil Penalty Action) DMS No. FAA-2009-1041 

## AMENDED PROCEDURAL ORDER Paragraph#2 ofthe Procedural Order is amended as follows: WHEREFORE, the parties be and are hereby ORDERED to adhere to the following procedural schedule:

,.. On or before May 

### 1, 2010, theparties shall conclude all discoveryincluding, butnot limitedto, depositions, documentproduction, responses toproduction requests and/or interrogatories. 

## if theparties cannot resolve a discovery dispute they shallsubmit the dispute to the undersigned for resolution In a timely manner... J



### Attachment

- Service List

I The court does not anticipate scheduling this case prior to 1 May 2010.FAA Docket No. CP09NM0014 (Civil Penalty Action) 

### SERVICE LIST ORIGINAL & 

### ONE COpy Federal Aviation Administration 800Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk,**AGC~430** Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2WlOOO I 

### ONE COpy Richard A. Johnson, 

### Respondent's Counsel 3815 Rickenbacker Street, Suite 208 Boise, ID 83705 TEL:**208-344~** 1384 FAX: 208.:343-5121 David F. Shayne, 

### Complainant's Counsel Northwest Mountain Region, ANM-7 Federal Aviation Administration 1601 Lind Avenue, S.W. Renton, W A 98057 TEL: 425-227-2165 FAX: 425-227-1007 The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin,

### Administrative Law Judge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.B. EastBuilding Ground Floor, Room E12-320 Washington,DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 202-366-5121 Legal Assistant FAX: 202-366-7536

1 Service was by U.S. MaiL For service in person orby expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC·430.
### §1406. Persons living in and born in the Virgin Islands

(a) The following persons and their children born subsequent to January 17, 1917, and prior to February 25,1927, are declared to be citizens of the United States as of February 25, 1927:

(1) All former Danish citizens who, on January 17, 1917, resided in the Virgin Islands of the United States, and were residing in those islands or in the United States or Puerto Rico on February 25, 1927, and who did not make the declaration required to preserve their Danish citizenship by article 6 of the treaty entered into on August 4, 1916, between the United States and Denmark, or who, having made such a declaration have heretofore renounced or may hereafter renounce it by a declaration before a court of record;

(2) All natives of the Virgin Islands of the United States who, on January 17, 1917, resided in those islands, and were residing in those islands or in the United States or Puerto Rico on February 25, 1927, and who were not on February 25, 1927, citizens or subjects of any foreign country;

(3) All natives of the Virgin Islands of the United States who, on January 17, 1917, resided in the United States, and were residing in those islands on February 25, 1927, and who were not on February 25, 1927, citizens or subjects of any foreign country; and

(4) All natives of the Virgin Islands of the United States who, on June 28, 1932, were residing in continental United States, the Virgin Islands of the United States, Puerto Rico, the Canal Zone, or any other insular possession or territory of the United States, and who, on June 28, 1932, were not citizens or subjects of any foreign country, regardless of their place of residence on January 17, 1917.

(b) All persons born in the Virgin Islands of the United States on or after January 17, 1917, and prior to February 25, 1927, and subject to the jurisdiction of the United States are declared to be citizens of the United States as of February 25, 1927; and all persons born in those islands on or after February 25, 1927, and subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, are declared to be citizens of the United States at birth.

(June 27, 1952, ch. 477, title III, ch. 1, §306, 66 Stat. 237.)
#### 1219.202 Specific policies.

OSDBU is responsible for reviewing procurement strategies and subcontracting efforts, establishing review thresholds and making recommendations to further the implementation of this part. The OSDBU Director may waive review of certain classes of acquisitions that the Director identifies as providing limited or no opportunity for small business participation or may delegate review of such acquisitions to the OA Small Business Specialists.
#### 1371.114 Government review, comment, acceptance, and approval.

Insert clause 1352.271-83, *Government Review, Comment, Acceptance and Approval,* in all solicitations and contracts for ship construction and ship repair.
§ 1633.7 General principles of classification. ( a ) Each classified registrant in a selection group is available for unrestricted military service until his eligibility for noncombatant service, alternative service, or deferment or exemption from service has been determined by a classifying authority.
( b ) The classifying authority in considering a registrant's claim for classification shall not discriminate for or against him because of his race, creed, color or ethnic background and shall not discriminate for or against him because of his membership or activity in any labor, political, religious, or other organization.
[47 FR 4654, Feb. 1, 1982, as amended at 52 FR 24457, July 1, 1987]
### §§362, 363. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Sections, act Mar. 2, 1887, ch. 314, §§1, 2, 24 Stat. 440, as amended, were transferred to sections 361a and 361b, respectively, of this title.
Lexter Kossie#700661 William McConnell Unit 

### 3001 SouthEmily Drive fBeeville, Texas 78102



### April 26, 2015
Texas Court of Criminal Appeals 

### P.O. BOX 12308, Capitol Station Austin, Texas 78711
RE: WR NOs. 10,978-01 thru 10,978-16 Tr.Ct.NOs. 679887-A thru 679887-K 

### 185thDistrict Court - Harris County 

# lOfilk-Qi^Ol,03,0V&&{&>-&

COURTOFCRIMINALAPPBX APR292fl?5

Dear Clerk: 

### Recently Ihave been cited for abuse of the writ. In order for me to show that the claims I intend to raise in my 

### subsequent writ are not barred by Sec 4 I am requesting the docket sheet of all the writs mentioned above with a list of all of the claims presented in each of those application. With out a list of all of the claims I cannot show that the claims 

### I intend to raise have not been raised before in those prior 

### applications. 

### Thankyou for anyconsiderationgiven in this matter. Sincerely,

cc:File Lextai? Kennon Kossie
Opinion issued August 1, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The

First District of Texas 

NO. 01B12B00543BCV

DAVID N. MANNING, Appellant

V.

WILMA J. MANNING, Appellee

On Appeal from the 300th District Court

Brazoria County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 60486

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant David N. Manning has failed to timely file a brief. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 38.6(a) (governing time to file brief), 38.8(a) (governing failure of appellant 
2

to file brief). On April 1, 2013, this Court sent a notice to appellant that the appeal 

was subject to dismissal because he had failed to timely file his brief, and required a 

response on or before April 11, 2013. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b) (allowing 

involuntary dismissal of case). On April 16, 2013, the notification was returned to 

the Court marked “Return to Sender, Not Deliverable As Addressed, Unable to 

Forward.” The notice was sent to the address provided by appellant in his notice of 

appeal and other filings with this Court, and appellant has not provided the Court 

with a new address. Appellant was required to provide this Court with his current 

address to facilitate this Court’s communication with appellant. See TEX.R. APP. P.

6.3(c), 9.1(b).

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution for failure to 

timely file a brief. We dismiss any pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Higley, and Bland.
#### The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v. James Cotton, Respondent.

In a criminal action, the People appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered January 6, 1964 after a hearing, which granted defendant’s motion, made pursuant to statute (Code Grim. Pro., § 813-c), to suppress certain evidence against him on the ground that it was obtained as the result of an illegal search and seizure. The People have filed the statement required by statute to perfect their appeal from said order (Code Grim. Pro., § 518, subd. 6; § 518-a). Order reversed on the law and the facts and motion denied. In our opinion, the findings of fact in the court below were against the weight of the evidence: The defendant was indicted for unlawful possession of a loaded zip gun, as a felony (Penal Law, § 1897). At the hearing on the motion, Patrolman Britton was the sole witness; he was called by the defendant. We find his testimony clear and convincing: (a) that the police never searched or even attempted to search the defendant while he was voluntarily in a police patrol car on the way to a police station; (b) that, during the ride, it was the defendant himself who (apparently accidentally) exposed the gun to the policeman’s view when he (the defendant) attempted surreptitiously to remove it from its place of concealment in the waistband of his trousers, over the top of which the bottom of his sweater extended; and (e) that it was not until this incident occurred that the police seized the gun from the defendant and placed him under arrest. Hence, as the gun was not the product of any police search — legal or illegal — it was error to grant the motion to suppress the use of the gun as evidence. Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Brennan and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
### TEXA S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN

NO. 03-05-00050- CR

Te odo r o Be nav ide s, App e lla nt

v. The State of Texas, App ellee

F ROM THE DISTRICT CO URT OF TRAVIS COUNTY , 331ST JUDICI AL DISTRICT NO. 20443 96, H ONO RAB LE FRED A. MO ORE, JUDGE P RESIDING

M E M O R

A N D UM O P I N I O N
A ju r y found appe llant Teodoro B enavide s g uilty of burg lary

of a ha bitation. See

T e x. Pen. Code Ann. § 30.02 (West 2003). The jury assessed punishment, e nhance d by two previous fe lony c onvic tio ns , at f

or ty -f ive y e ars ’ i mpr iso nme nt. Ap pe lla nt’ s c ourt -a

pp ointe d atto rn e y

fi le d a br ie f c on c lud ing

that th e a

pp eal is frivolous and without mer it. The brief meets the re quirements of An de rs v . Ca lif or nia , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), by

prese nting a

profe ssional evaluation of t h e re co rd demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be adva nced. Se e als o Pe ns on v . O hio , 4 88 U. S. 7 5 ( 19 88 ); Hi gh v . S tate , 573 S.W. 2d 807 ( Te x. Cr im. Ap p. 19 78 ); Cur riev . S tate , 516 S.W .2d 684 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974); J ac k so n v . S tate , 4 85 S.W. 2d

55 3 ( Te x. Cr im. Ap p. 19 72 ); Ga ino us v . S tate , 4 3 6 S. W. 2 d

1 3 7 ( T e x. Crim. App. 1969). Appellant re ceive d a copy of counse l’s bri ef an d filed both a pro se written response and a pr o se brief
.2 We h ave re vie we d th e rec or d, c ouns e l’ s b ri e f, the pr o s e re sp on se , a nd the pr o s e br ie f. We a g re e tha

t th e a pp e a l is fr ivo lou s. We f ind no thi ngin t

he re c or d th at mi g ht a

rgua bly support the appe al. Se e Ble ds oev . S tate , No. P D-300-04, 2005 Tex. Crim. App. L EXI S 1969, at *7- 8 (Tex. Crim. App. Nov. 16, 2005). Counsel’s motion to wit hdrawis gr anted.

The judg ment of convic tion is affirmed.

__________________________________________ G. Alan Waldrop, Just ice Be fore Chief J ustice L aw, Justi ces Pembe rton and Waldrop Affir med Filed: F ebrua

ry 16, 2006 Do No t Pu

bli sh
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

Winnie Van, )

)

Plaintiff, )

 )

v. ) No. 12 C 1219

)

Credit Control, LLC, a Missouri limited ) Judge Feinerman

liability company, and JH Portfolio Debt )

Equities,LLC, a California limited liability )

company, ) 

)

Defendants. )

NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY 

DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Plaintiff, pursuant to settlement and F.R.C.P. Rule 41, hereby voluntarily 

dismisses her claims against the Defendants, with prejudice.

Dated: March 12, 2012

One of Plaintiff's Attorneys

/s/ David J. Philipps_______

David J. Philipps (Ill. Bar No. 06196285)

Mary E. Philipps (Ill. Bar No. 06197113)

Philipps & Philipps, Ltd. 

9760 S. Roberts Road 

Suite One

Palos Hills, Illinois 60465 

davephilipps@aol.com

mephilipps@aol.com

Case: 1:12-cv-01219 Document #: 6 Filed: 03/12/12 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:27
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on March 12, 2012, a copy of the foregoing Notice of 

Voluntary Dismissal with Prejudice was filed electronically. Notice of this filing will be 

sent to the following parties via U.S. Mail, first class postage pre-paid, on March 12, 

2012. 

Credit Control, LLC, and

JH Portfolio Debt Equities, LLC

c/o Nathan D. Sturycz, Associate Attorney

Husch Blackwell, LLP

190 Carondelet Plaza

Suite 600

St. Louis, Missouri 63105

/s/ David J. Philipps__________

David J. Philipps (Ill. Bar No. 06196285)

Philipps & Philipps, Ltd.

9760 South Roberts Road

Suite One

Palos Hills, Illinois 60465

(708) 974-2900

(708) 974-2907 (FAX)

davephilipps@aol.com

Case: 1:12-cv-01219 Document #: 6 Filed: 03/12/12 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:28
#### DONOVAN v. CANTOR.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

November 6, 1903.)

Action by Bartholomew Donovan against Jacob A. Cantor.

No opinion. Motion to dismiss appeal denied.
# FY 04 FFELP state