alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 9 (Thursday, January 14, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 3196]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-00677]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

JUDICIAL CONFERENCE OF THE UNITED STATES


Advisory Committee on Evidence Rules; Meeting of the Judicial 
Conference

AGENCY: Judicial Conference of the United States.

ACTION: Advisory Committee on Evidence Rules, notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Advisory Committee on Evidence Rules will hold a meeting 
on April 30, 2021 in Washington, DC. The meeting will be open to public 
observation but not participation. An agenda and supporting materials 
will be posted at least 7 days in advance of the meeting at: http://www.uscourts.gov/rules-policies/records-and-archives-rules-committees/agenda-books.

DATES: April 30, 2021, 9 a.m.-5 p.m. (Eastern).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rebecca A. Womeldorf, Secretary, 
Committee on Rules of Practice and Procedure of the Judicial Conference 
of the United States, Thurgood Marshall Federal Judiciary Building, One 
Columbus Circle NE, Suite 7-300, Washington, DC 20544, Phone (202) 502-
1820, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#faa88f969f89b9959797938e8e9f9fa5a99f99889f8e9b8883ba9b95d48f8999958f888e89d49d958c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e6b4938a8395a5898b8b8f92928383b9b5838594839287949fa68789c89395858993949295c8818990">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Authority:  28 U.S.C. 2073.

    Dated: January 11, 2021.
Rebecca A. Womeldorf,
Rules Committee Secretary, Rules Committee Staff.
[FR Doc. 2021-00677 Filed 1-13-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 2210-55-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 63 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 63

  To clarify the rights of Indians and Indian tribes on Indian lands 
                under the National Labor Relations Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 9, 2017

Mr. Moran (for himself, Mr. Crapo, Mr. Daines, Mr. Flake, Mr. Gardner, 
 Mr. Johnson, Mr. Lankford, Mr. McCain, Mr. Thune, Mr. Wicker, and Mr. 
Risch) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 
                   to the Committee on Indian Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To clarify the rights of Indians and Indian tribes on Indian lands 
                under the National Labor Relations Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Tribal Labor Sovereignty Act of 
2017''.

SEC. 2. DEFINITION OF EMPLOYER.

    Section 2 of the National Labor Relations Act (29 U.S.C. 152) is 
amended--
            (1) in paragraph (2), by inserting ``or any Indian tribe, 
        or any enterprise or institution owned and operated by an 
        Indian tribe and located on its Indian lands,'' after 
        ``subdivision thereof,''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(15) The term `Indian tribe' means any Indian tribe, 
        band, nation, pueblo, or other organized group or community 
        which is recognized as eligible for the special programs and 
        services provided by the United States to Indians because of 
        their status as Indians.
            ``(16) The term `Indian' means any individual who is a 
        member of an Indian tribe.
            ``(17) The term `Indian lands' means--
                    ``(A) all lands within the limits of any Indian 
                reservation;
                    ``(B) any lands title to which is either held in 
                trust by the United States for the benefit of any 
                Indian tribe or individual or held by any Indian tribe 
                or individual subject to restriction by the United 
                States against alienation; and
                    ``(C) any lands in the State of Oklahoma that are 
                within the boundaries of a former reservation (as 
                defined by the Secretary of the Interior) of a 
                federally recognized Indian tribe.''.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 734 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 734

    To extend a project of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 
                    involving the Cannonsville Dam.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 27, 2017

Mrs. Gillibrand introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To extend a project of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 
                    involving the Cannonsville Dam.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF TIME FOR A FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION 
              PROJECT INVOLVING CANNONSVILLE DAM.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding the time period specified in 
section 13 of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 806) that would 
otherwise apply to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission project 
numbered 13287, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (referred to 
in this section as the ``Commission'') may, at the request of the 
licensee for the project, and after reasonable notice, in accordance 
with the good faith, due diligence, and public interest requirements of 
that section and the procedures of the Commission under that section, 
extend the time period during which the licensee is required to 
commence construction of the project for up to 4 consecutive 2-year 
periods after the required date of the commencement of construction 
described in Article 301 of the license.
    (b) Reinstatement of Expired License.--
            (1) In general.--If the required date of the commencement 
        of construction described in subsection (a) has expired prior 
        to the date of enactment of this Act, the Commission may 
        reinstate the license effective as of that date of expiration.
            (2) Extension.--If the Commission reinstates the license 
        under paragraph (1), the first extension authorized under 
        subsection (a) shall take effect on the date of that 
        expiration.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21


                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT


Prima Energy Corporation, a Delaware corporation, has one direct wholly owned
subsidiary, Prima Oil & Gas Company, a Colorado corporation.

Prima Oil & Gas Company has four significant wholly owned subsidiaries. These
are as follows:

          1.  Action Oil Field Services, Inc., a Colorado corporation.

          2.  Action Energy Services, a Wyoming corporation.

          3.  Prima Natural Gas Marketing, Inc., a Colorado corporation.

          4.  Arete Gathering Company, LLC, a Wyoming limited liability
              corporation.
1239.7003 Contract clauses. ( a ) The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 1252.239-72, Compliance with Safeguarding DOT Sensitive Data Controls, in all solicitations, including solicitations using FAR part 12 procedures for the acquisition of commercial products and commercial services, except for solicitations solely for the acquisition of commercially available off-the-shelf (COTS) items.
( b ) The contracting officer shall insert clause at 1252.239-73, Limitations on the Use or Disclosure of Third-Party Contractor Reported Cyber Incident Information, in all solicitations and contracts, including solicitations and contracts using FAR part 12 procedures for the acquisition of commercial products and commercial services, for commercial services that include support for the Government's activities related to safeguarding DOT sensitive data and cyber incident reporting.
( c ) The contracting officer shall insert clause at 1252.239-74, Safeguarding DOT Sensitive Data and Cyber Incident Reporting, in all solicitations and contracts, including solicitations and contracts using FAR part 12 procedures for the acquisition of commercial products and commercial services, except for solicitations and contracts solely for the acquisition of COTS items.
### §§80 to 83. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Sections were omitted in the general reorganization of this chapter by Pub. L. 90–487, §1, Aug. 15, 1968, 82 Stat. 761.

Section 80, act Aug. 11, 1916, ch. 313, pt. B, §7 (part), 39 Stat. 484, provided for revocation and suspension of licenses issued by the Secretary of Agriculture. See section 85 of this title.

Section 81, act Aug. 11, 1916, ch. 313, pt. B, §7 (part), 39 Stat. 484, prohibited the existence of an interest, financial or otherwise, direct or indirect, on the part of inspectors in grain elevators or warehouses or in the merchandising of grain. See section 87 of this title.

Section 82, act Aug. 11, 1916, ch. 313, pt. B, §7 (part), 39 Stat. 484, required maintenance of records and reports by inspectors. See section 87a of this title.

Section 83, act Aug. 11, 1916, ch. 313, pt. B, §7 (part), 39 Stat. 484, called for a semiannual report by the Secretary of Agriculture on the delivery of grain in the nation.
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Jessie Watch, Respondent, v. Warwick Valley Contractors, Inc., et al., Appellants. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.

Appeal by the employer and its carrier from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Board awarding death benefits on the ground that there is no substantial evidence to support the board’s finding that a compensable myocardial infarction decedent sustained in 1956 while employed by the employer herein *“*superimposed upon an underlying arteriosclerotic condition resulted in congestive heart failure and death on October 18, 1957.” On December 10,1956, when decedent was age 55 and employed by the employer herein, he suffered what was diagnosed as a posterior wall myocardial infarction. After a contested hearing compensation was awarded for total disability from December 11, 1956 to February 3,1957 and for partial disability from February 3 to August 3, 1957. From August 3 until October 17, 1957, decedent worked as a watchman for another employer. On September 24, 1957 Dr. Witt, who *999had treated decedent when he had had his infarction, was called to visit decedent at decedent’s home and noticed what he diagnosed to be signs of congestive heart failure. Subsequently on office visits to Dr. Witt on October 1 and October 5, 1957 decedent again exhibited symptoms of congestive heart failure. On October 17, 1957 decedent was hospitalized by Dr. Witt, but he expired soon after admission. An autopsy was performed which revealed, among other things, extensive fibrosis in the interventricular septum and of the myocardium of the left ventricle and marked arteriosclerosis of the coronary vessels but no recent infarction. Dr. Witt, a general practitioner and claimant’s sole expert, gave a history of decedent’s myocardial infarction of December 10, 1956. He then testified that decedent’s death of congestive heart failure was causally related to the 1956 infarction. While on cross-examination he admitted that decedent had a coronary pathology of the atherioselerosis type which could have led to congestive heart failure in and of itself, on redirect he opined that the infarct superimposed on the arteriosclerotic condition could have shortened the decedent’s life. Appellants’ expert, Dr. Mokotoff, did not deny that the infarct contributed to decedent’s death but felt that a nonrelated lung disease contributed “just as much” to death as the infarct. Thus we find the record presents the usual conflict of medical evidence with respect to causal relationship which the board has resolved on the basis of substantial evidence and which therefore may not be disturbed *(Matter of Schechter*v. *State Ins. Fund,*6 N Y 2d 506, 512; *Matter of Palermo*v. *Gallucci & Sons,*5 N Y 2d 529). Decision and award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Present — Bergan, P. J., Gibson, Herlihy, Reynolds and Taylor, JJ.
### §918c. Rural and remote communities electrification grants

#### (a) Definitions

In this section:

(1) The term "eligible grantee" means a local government or municipality, peoples' utility district, irrigation district, and cooperative, nonprofit, or limited-dividend association in a rural area.

(2) The term "incremental hydropower" means additional generation achieved from increased efficiency after January 1, 2005, at a hydroelectric dam that was placed in service before January 1, 2005.

(3) The term "renewable energy" means electricity generated from—

(A) a renewable energy source; or

(B) hydrogen, other than hydrogen produced from a fossil fuel, that is produced from a renewable energy source.

(4) The term "renewable energy source" means—

(A) wind;

(B) ocean waves;

(C) biomass;

(D) solar;

(E) landfill gas;

(F) incremental hydropower;

(G) livestock methane; or

(H) geothermal energy.

(5) The term "rural area" means a city, town, or unincorporated area that has a population of not more than 10,000 inhabitants.

#### (b) Grants

The Secretary, in consultation with the Secretary of Agriculture and the Secretary of the Interior, may provide grants under this section to eligible grantees for the purpose of—

(1) increasing energy efficiency, siting or upgrading transmission and distribution lines serving rural areas; or

(2) providing or modernizing electric generation facilities that serve rural areas.

#### (c) Grant administration

(1) The Secretary shall make grants under this section based on a determination of cost-effectiveness and the most effective use of the funds to achieve the purposes described in subsection (b).

(2) For each fiscal year, the Secretary shall allocate grant funds under this section equally between the purposes described in paragraphs (1) and (2) of subsection (b).

(3) In making grants for the purposes described in subsection (b)(2), the Secretary shall give preference to renewable energy facilities.

#### (d) Authorization of appropriations

There is authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary to carry out this section $20,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2006 through 2012.

(Pub. L. 95–617, title VI, §609, as added Pub. L. 109–58, title II, §209, Aug. 8, 2005, 119 Stat. 657.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978, and not as part of the Rural Electrification Act of 1936 which comprises this chapter.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Definitions

Secretary means the Secretary of Energy, see section 2602(14) of Title 16, Conservation.
### §8789. Storage facility loans

#### (a) In general

As soon as practicable after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall establish a storage facility loan program to provide funds for producers of grains, oilseeds, pulse crops, hay, renewable biomass, and other storable commodities (other than sugar), as determined by the Secretary, to construct or upgrade storage and handling facilities for the commodities.

#### (b) Eligible producers

A storage facility loan under this section shall be made available to any producer described in subsection (a) that, as determined by the Secretary—

(1) has a satisfactory credit history;

(2) has a need for increased storage capacity; and

(3) demonstrates an ability to repay the loan.

#### (c) Term of loans

A storage facility loan under this section shall have a maximum term of 12 years.

#### (d) Loan amount

The maximum principal amount of a storage facility loan under this section shall be $500,000.

#### (e) Loan disbursements

The Secretary shall provide for 1 partial disbursement of loan principal and 1 final disbursement of loan principal, as determined to be appropriate and subject to acceptable documentation, to facilitate the purchase and construction of eligible facilities.

#### (f) Loan security

Approval of a storage facility loan under this section shall—

(1) require the borrower to provide loan security to the Secretary, in the form of—

(A) a lien on the real estate parcel on which the storage facility is located; or

(B) such other security as is acceptable to the Secretary;

(2) under such rules and regulations as the Secretary may prescribe, not require a severance agreement from the holder of any prior lien on the real estate parcel on which the storage facility is located, if the borrower—

(A) agrees to increase the down payment on the storage facility by an amount determined appropriate by the Secretary; or

(B) provides other security acceptable to the Secretary; and

(3) allow a borrower, upon the approval of the Secretary, to define a subparcel of real estate as security for the storage facility loan if the subparcel is—

(A) of adequate size and value to adequately secure the loan; and

(B) not subject to any other liens or mortgages that are superior to the lien interest of the Commodity Credit Corporation.

(Pub. L. 110–234, title I, §1614, May 22, 2008, 122 Stat. 1020; Pub. L. 110–246, §4(a), title I, §1614, June 18, 2008, 122 Stat. 1664, 1748.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The date of enactment of this Act, referred to in subsec. (a), is the date of enactment of Pub. L. 110–246, which was approved June 18, 2008.

#### Codification

Pub. L. 110–234 and Pub. L. 110–246 enacted identical sections. Pub. L. 110–234 was repealed by section 4(a) of Pub. L. 110–246.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Enactment of this section and repeal of Pub. L. 110–234 by Pub. L. 110–246 effective May 22, 2008, the date of enactment of Pub. L. 110–234, see section 4 of Pub. L. 110–246, set out as a note under section 8701 of this title.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

REGION.IX 

75 Hawthorne Street 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

October 14, 2014 

Dwight E. Mallory 

Environmental/Regulatory Manager 

Resolute Natural Resources Company, LLC 

1700 Lincoln Street, Suite 2800 

Denver, CO 80203 

In Reply 

Refer To: 

AIR-3 

NU 05-01 

Subject: Proposed PSD Permit Amendment for the McElmo Creek Unit Oil 

Production Facility 

Dear Mr. Mallory: 

This letter and the enclosed materials are in response to your to the Clean Air Act Prevention of 

Significant Deterioration (PSD) permit application for the McElmo Creek Unit Oil Production 

Facility (MCU Facility). The application requests that the United States Environmental 

Protection Agency, Region 9 (EPA) incorporate into the MCU Facility's PSD permit the 

pollution limits, terms, and conditions of a federal Consent Decree (United States v. Mobil 

Exploration and Producing U.S. Inc., Case No. 2:05-CV-319, filed June 8, 2005) that apply to 

the Main Flare at the facility. The MCU Facility is an existing oil and gas production operation 

that is owned, in partnership with Navajo Nation Oil and Gas Company, and operated by the 

Resolute Natural Resources Company. The facility is located in.Section 31, Township 40 South, 

Range 25 East within the Four Comers Area on the Navajo Nation Indian Reservation near the 

town of Aneth, San Juan County, Utah. 

We have reviewed your application and supporting materials, based on the criteria in the EPA's 

PSD regulations at 40 CFR 52.21. Enclosed are the proposed PSD permit amendment, Ambient 

Air Quality Impact Report and Fact Sheet, and public notice. The public notice will also be 

published on Wednesday, October 15th through Friday, October 17th, 2014, depending on the 

publication date of the following newspapers in the Four Comers area: Navajo Times, 

Farmington Daily Times, Cortez Journal, and San Juan Record. We have scheduled a public 

hearing on November 20,2014, at the Aneth Chapter House in Aneth, Utah. The proposed PSD 

permit amendment and other documents related to the PSD permit application are also available 

on our website at: http://www.epa.gov/region9/air/permit/r9-permits-issued.html. 
If you have any questions, you may contact Shaheerah Kelly at ( 415) 94 7-4156 or 

kelly.shaheerah@epa.gov. 

Enclosures 

Sincerely, 

2/;;b 

Gerardo C. Rios 

Chief, Permits Office 

Air Division 

cc: Patrick E Flynn, Resolute Natural Resources Company (via email) 

Tom Hormell, McVehil-Monnett Associates, Inc (via email) 

Raju Bisht, Navajo Nation EPA (via email) 

Tennille Begay, Navajo Nation EPA (via email) 

2