# Appendix IV-C

Air Quality Management Plan

South Coast Air Quality Management District Cleaning the air that we breathe... ® 

# AQ MD 

# December 2012 T R A N S P O R T A T I O



### N 

# A 

# I



# R 

# Q 

# U 

# A L I T Y

E N

E R G Y



# C 

# L 

# I 

# M A T E 

# Regional Transportation Strategy and Control Measures

# FINAL 20 12 AQMP

APPENDIX IV

- C



# Regional Transportation Strategy and

Control Measures

December 20 12

# Mission Statement

Under the guidance of the Regional Council and in collaboration with our partners, our mission is to facilitate a forum to develop and foster the realization of regional plans that improve the quality of life for Southern Californians.

## SCAG Regional Council

OFFICERS

President : Glen Becerra, Simi Valley First Vice President : Greg Pettis, Cathedral City Second Vice President : Carl Morehouse, San Buenaventura Immediate Past President : Pam O‟Connor, Santa Monica

MEMBERS

Imperial County: Jack Terrazas, Imperial County | Cheryl Viegas

- Walker, El Centro

Los Angeles Cou nty: Mike Antonovich, Los Angeles County | Mark Ridley

- Thomas, Los Angeles County | Richard Alarcón, Los Angeles | Sylvia Ballin , San Fernando | Bruce Barrows, Cerritos | Joe Biscayne, Los Angeles | Tony Cardenas, Los Angeles | Stan Carroll, La Habra Heights | Margaret Clark, Rosemead | Gene Daniels, Paramount | Mitchell Englander, Los Angeles | Margaret E. Finlay, Duarte | David Gafin, Downey | Eric Garcetti, Los Angeles | James Gazeley, Lomita | Frank Gurulé, Cudahy | Keith W. Hanks, Azusa | Carol H errera, Diamond Bar | Steve Hofbauer, Palmdale | José Huizar, Los Angeles | James Johnson, Long Beach | Paul Koretz, Los Angeles | Paul Krekorian, Los Angeles | Tom LaBonge, Los Angeles | Paula Lantz, Pomona | Dan Medina, Gardena | Barbara Messina, Alhambr a | Judy Mitchell, Rolling Hills Estates | Jim Morton, Lynwood | Steven Neal, Long Beach | Pam O‟Connor, Santa Monica | Bernard Parks, Los Angeles | Jan Perry, Los Angeles | Frank Quintero, Glendale | Ed P. Reyes, Los Angeles | Bill Rosendahl, Los Angeles | Mark Rutherford, Westlake Village | Antonio Villaraigosa, Los Angeles | Donald Voss, La Cañada Flintridge | Herb J. Wesson, Jr., Los Angeles | Dennis Zine, Los Angeles

Orange County: Shawn Nelson, Orange County | Leslie Daigle, Newport Beach | Paul Glaab, Laguna Niguel | Matthew Harper, Huntington Beach | Sukhee Kang, Irvine | Joel Lautenschleger, Laguna Hills | Michele Martinez, Santa Ana | Leroy Mills, Cypress | Brett Murdock, Brea | Kris Murray, Anaheim | John Nielsen, Tus tin | Andy Quach, Westmi nster

Riverside County: Jeff Stone, Riverside County | Jim Hyatt, Calimesa | Darcy Kuenzi, Menifee | Ron Loveridge, Riverside | Greg Pettis, Cathedral City | Lupe Ramos Watson, Indio | Ron ald Roberts, Temecula

San Bernardino County: Gary Ovitt, San Bernardino County | Paul Eaton, Montclair | Ed Graham, Chino Hills | Jon Harrison, Redlands | Bill Jahn, Big Bear Lake | Larry McCallon, Highland | Deborah Robertson, Rialto

Ventura County: Linda Parks, Ventura County | Glen Becerra, Simi Valley | Bryan A. MacDonald, Oxnard | Carl Morehouse, San Buenaventura

Tribal Government Representative: Vacant

Orange County Transportation Authority: Jerry Amante, Tustin

Riverside County Transportation Commission: Mary Craton, Canyon Lake

San Bernardino Associate d Governments: Alan Wapner, Ontario

Ventura County Transportation Commission: Keith Millhouse, Moorpark



### Transportation Corridors Agency: Lisa Bartlett, Dana Point

Ex

- O fficio : R a ndall Lewis , Lewis Group of Companies

## Final 2012 AQMP Appendix IV

- C

IV

- C

- 1 Executive Summary

This Appendix describes the Southern California Association of Government‟s (SCAG) transportation strategy and transportation control measures (TCMs) to be included as part of the 2012 Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP) / PM2.5 State Implementation Plan (S IP) for the South Coast Air Basin. The transportation strategy and TCMs are based on SCAG‟s adopted 2012

- 2035 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS) and 2011 Federal Transportation Improvement Program (FTIP) as amended whi ch were developed in consultation with f

ederal, s tate and local transportation and air quality planning agencies and other stakeholders. The four County Transportation Commissions (CTCs) in the South Coast Air Basin, namely Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority, Riverside County Transportation Commission, Orange County Transportation Authority and the San Bernardino Associated Governments, were actively involve d in the development of the regional transportation measures of this Appendix.

The Regional Transportation Strategy and Transportation Control Measures portion of the 2012 AQMP/SIP consists of the following three related Sections

. Section I. Linking Regional Transportation Planning to Air Quality Planning

As required by federal and state laws, SCAG is responsible for ensuring that the regional transportation plan, program, and projects are supportive of the goals and objectives of AQMPs/SIPs

. SCAG is also required to develop demographic projections and reg ional transportation strategy and control measures for the AQMPs/SIPs.

As the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO), SCAG develops the RTP/SCS every four years. The RTP/SCS is a long

- range regional transportation plan that provides a vision for transpo rtation investments throughout the SCAG region. The 2012

- 2035 RTP/SCS also integrates land use and transportation planning to achieve regional greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction targets set by the California Air Resources Board (ARB) pursuant to SB375.

SCAG a lso develops the biennial FTIP. The FTIP is a multimodal list of capital improvement projects to be implemented over a six year period. The FTIP implements the programs and projects in the RTP/SCS.

Section II. Regional Transportation Strategy and TCMs

The SCAG region faces daunting mobility, air quality, and transportation funding challenges

. Under the guidance of the goals and objectives adopted by SCAG‟s Regional Council, the 2012

- 2035 RTP/SCS was developed to provide a blueprint to integrate land us e and transportation strategies to help achieve a coordinated and balanced regional transportation system

. The 2012

- 2035 RTP/SCS represents the culmination of more than two years of work involving dozens of public agencies, 191 cities, hundreds of local, county, regional and state officials, the business community, environmental groups, as well as various nonprofit organizations. The 2012

- 2035 RTP/SCS was formally adopted by the SCAG Regional Council on April 4, 2012.

## Final 2012 AQMP Appendix IV

- C

IV

- C

- 2 T he 2012

- 2035 RTP/SCS contains a host of improvements to every component of the regional multimodal transportation system including:

 Active transportation

 Transportation demand management (TDM)

 Transportation system management (TSM)

 Transit

 Passenger and high

- speed rail

 Goods movement

 Aviation and airport ground access

 Highways

 Arterials

 Operations and maintenance

Included within these transportation system improvements are projects that reduce vehicle use or changing traffic flow or congestion conditions (“TCMs”). TCMs include the fo llowing three main categories of transportation improvement projects and programs:

 High occupancy vehicle (HOV) measures,

 Transit and systems management measures, and

 Information

- based transportation strategies.

New to this cycle of the RTP is the inclusio n of the SCS as required by SB 375. The primary goal of the SCS is to provide a vision for future growth in Southern California that will decrease per capita GHG emission s from passenger vehicles . However, the strategies contained in the 2012

- 2035 RTP/SC S will produce benefits for the region far beyond simply reducing GHG emissions. The SCS strives to integrate the transportation network and related strategies with an overall land use pattern that responds to projected growth, housing needs, changing dem ographics, and transportation demands. The regional vision of the SCS maximizes current voluntary local efforts that support the goals of SB 375. The SCS focus es the majority of new housing and job growth in high

- quality transit areas and other opportuni ty areas on existing main streets, in downtowns, and commercial corridors, resulting in an improved jobs

- housing balance and more opportunity for transit

- oriented development. In addition, SCAG is a strategic partner in a regional effort to accelerate fle et conversion to near

- zero and zero

- emission transportation technologies. A significant expansion of alternative

- fuel infrastructure is needed throughout the region to accommodate the anticipate d increase in alternative fueled vehicles.

Section I II . Reaso nably Available Control Measure Analysis

As required by t he Federal Clean Air Act ( CAA )

, a reasonably available control measure ( RACM ) analysis must be included as part of the overall control strategy in the AQMP/ SIP to

ensure that all potential control measures are evaluated for implementation and that justification is provided for those measures that are not implemented. Appendix IV

- C contains the TCM RACM component for the South Coast PM2.5 control strategy. In accordance with EPA procedures, this an alysis considers TCMs in the 2012

- 2035 RTP/SCS, measures identified by the CAA , and relevant measures adopted in other non

- attainment areas of the country

.

## Final 2012 AQMP Appendix IV

- C

IV

- C

- 3 Based on th is comprehensive review, it is determined that the TCMs being implemented in the South Coast Air Basin are inclusive of all TCM RACM. None of the candidate measures reviewed and determined to be infeasible meets the criteria for RACM implementation.

## Final 2012 AQMP Appendix IV

- C

IV

- C

- 4 Section I

. Linking Regional Transportation Planning to Ai r Quality Planning

Federal and State Requirements

The air quality conformity requirements of the Federal CAA establish a need to integrate air quality planning and regional transportation planning. This integration presents the challenge of balancing the r eal need for improved mobility with the equally important goal of cleaner air. As the f ederally

- designated MPO for the six

- county Southern California region, SCAG is required by law to ensure that transportation activities “conform” to, and are supportiv e of, the goals of regional and state air quality plans to attain the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). In addition, SCAG is a co

- producer, with the South Coast Air Quality Management District (AQMD), of the AQMP for the South Coast Air Basi n. SCAG has the responsibility for the demographic projections and integrated regional land use, housing, employment, and transportation programs, measures, and strategies, as well as analyzing and providing emissions data related to its planning responsi bilities (California Health and Safety Code §40460).

Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS) and Federal Transportation Improvement Program (FTIP)

The SCAG Region is the largest metropolitan planning area in the United States, encompassing 38,000 square miles. The r egion is divided into 14 subregions and is one of the largest concentrations of population, employment, income, business, industry and finance in the world. The six

- county SCAG Region is home to more than 18 m illion people, nearly half of the population of the state of California.

Federal and state regulations require SCAG, as the Regional Transportation Planning Agency and MPO, to develop an RTP every four years in order for our region's transportation proje cts to qualify for federal and state funding. The RTP is updated to reflect changes in trends, progress made on projects, and to adjust the growth forecast for population changes. The long

- range transportation plan provides a vision for transportation in vestments throughout the region. Using growth forecasts and economic trends that project out over a 20

- year period, the RTP considers the role of transportation in the broader context of economic, environmental, and quality

- of

- life goals for the future, id entifying regional transportation strategies to address our mobility needs.

The SCS is a newly required element of the RTP. The SCS integrate s land use and transportation strategies that will achieve ARB greenhouse gas emissions reduction targets. Acco rding to SB 375, “ The Sustainable Communities Strategy shall:

1. identify the general location of uses, residential densities, and building intensities within the region; 2. identify areas within the region sufficient to house all the population of the region, i ncluding all economic segments of the population, over the course of the planning period of the regional transportation plan taking into account net migration into the region, population growth, household formation and employment growth; 3. identify areas wit hin the region sufficient to house an eight

- year projection of the regional housing need for the region;

## Final 2012 AQMP Appendix IV

- C

IV

- C

- 5 4. identify a transportation network to service the transportation needs of the region; 5. gather and consider the best practically available scientific information regarding resource areas and farmland in the region; 6. consider the state housing goals specified in Sections 65580 and 65581; 7. set forth a forecasted development pattern for the region, which, when integrated with the transportation network, and other transportation measures and policies, will reduce the greenhouse gas emissions from automobiles and light trucks to achieve, if there is a feasible way to do so, the greenhouse gas emission reduction targets approved by the state board; 8. allow the reg ional transportation plan to comply with the federal Clean Air Act."

The RTP/SCS was developed through a collaborative process

, guided by the SCAG Regional Council and its Policy Committees and Sub

- committees, the Plans & Programs Technical Advisory Commit tee, numerous task forces, CTCs , subregions, local governments, state and federal agencies, environmental and business communities, tribal governments, non

- profit groups, as well as the general public. The RTP/SCS constitutes the Regional Transportation S trategy and Control Measures for the AQMP.

SCAG is also responsible for developing a biennial short

- term (six year planning horizon) FTIP. SCAG develops the FTIP in partnership with the CTCs of Imperial, Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino, and Ventura, and Caltrans Districts 7, 8, 11, and 12. The FTIP is a multimodal list of capital improvement projects to be implemented over a s ix

- year period

. The FTIP identifies specific funding sources and fund amounts for each project. It is prioritized to implement the region‟s overall strategy for providing mobility and improving both the efficiency and safety of the transportation system, while supporting efforts to attain federal and state air quality standards for the region by reducing transportation related air pollution. The FTIP must include all federally funded transportation projects in the region, as well as all regionally signifi cant transportation projects for which approval from federal funding agencies is required, regardless of funding source. The FTIP is developed to incrementally implement the programs and projects in the RTP

. TCMs that are committed to in the applicable SI P are derived from the first two years of the prevailing FTIP.

## Final 2012 AQMP Appendix IV

- C

IV

- C

- 6 Section II

. Regional Transportation Strategy and TCMs

Introduction

The 2012

- 2035 RTP/SCS is a long

- range regional transportation pl an that provides a blueprint to integrate land use and tra nsportation strategies to help achieve a coordinated and balanced regional transportation system. Transportation projects in the SCAG region must be included in the RTP/SCS in order to receive federal funding. The 2012

- 2035 RTP/SCS is comprised of the fo llowing elements: (1) a policy element that presents an overview of the challenges facing the region; the RTP/SCS goals, policies and performance outcomes; (2) the SCS, which includes land use policies and forecasted future growth and land use for the regi on; (3) an action element that describes the transportation investments and programs necessary to implement the Plan and performance measures to determine how the Plan performs; and (4) the financial element that summarizes the cost of Plan implementation constrained by a realistic projection of available revenues and provides recommendations for the allocation of funds.

The 2012

- 2035 RTP/SCS represents the culmination of more than two years of work involving dozens of public agencies, 191 cities, hundreds of local, county, regional and state officials, the business community, environmental groups, as well as various nonprofit organizations, and was founded on a broad

- based public outreach effort. The implementation of one of the most comprehensive and coor dinated public participation plans ever undertaken by SCAG is documented in the 2012

- 2035 RTP/SCS, Public Participation and Consultation Appendix 1



## .
The 2012

- 2035 RTP/SCS was formally adopted by the SCAG Regional Council on April 4, 2012 and submitted for approval to the federal agencies. The 2012

- 2035 RTP/SCS constitutes the transportation control strategy portion of the 2012 AQMP

. A full, illustrative list of the 2012

- 2035 RTP/SCS projects can be found in the Project List Appendix of the 2 012

- 2035 RTP/SCS. (See http://rtpscs.scag.ca.gov/Pages/2012

- 2035

- RTP

- SCS.aspx )

Key Planning Challenges

The challenges facing the region ‟s future are daunting :
Mobility Challenges : The region‟s roadways are the most congested in the nation, resulting in

over three million hours wasted each year sitting in traffic. Traffic relief is critical, even more so in the region‟s current economic situation. By failing to adequately address co ngestion in the Region , we have foregone jobs

- every 10 percent decrease in congestion can bring an employment increase of about 132,000 jobs

.
Air Quality Challenges : While Southern California is a leader in reducing emissions and ambient levels of air pollutants are improving, the SCAG region continues to have the worst air quality in the nation, and air pollution causes thousands of premature deaths every year, as w ell as other serious adverse health effects. The South Coast Air Basin has the worst air quality of the four air basins contained in the SCAG region.

1 

### http://rtpscs.scag.ca.gov/Documents/2012/final/SR/2012fRTP_PublicParticipation.pdf

## Final 2012 AQMP Appendix IV

- C

IV

- C

- 7 Funding Need : Of all the challenges facing the transportation system today, there is perhaps

none more cr itical than funding. With the projected growth in population, employment, and demand for travel, the costs of our multimodal transportation needs surpass projected revenues available from our historic transportation funding source

- the gas tax. State and federal gas taxes have not changed in nearly 20 years. Yet, highway construction costs have grown by over 80 percent. The region must consider ways to stabilize existing revenue sources and supplement them with reasonably available new sources.

Regional Goals and Policies : To Realize a Sustainable Future

To guide development of the projects, programs, and strategies, SCAG‟s Regional Council adopted goals and objectives that help carry out the 2012

- 2035 RTP/SCS vision which encompasses three principles: m obility, economy, and sustainability . The regional goals reflect the wide

- ranging challenges facing transportation planners and decision

- makers in achieving the RTP/SCS vision. The goals demonstrate the need to balance many priorities in the most cost

effe ctive manner. SCAG‟s Regional Council adopt ed the following goals as part of the 2012

- 2035 RTP/SCS.

 Align the plan investments and policies with improving regional economic development and competitiveness

 Maximize mobility and accessibility for all people and goods in the region

 Ensure travel safety and reliability for all people and goods in the region

 Preserve and ensure a sustainable regional transportation system

 Maximize the productivity of our transportation system

 Protect the environment and health o f our residents by improving air quality and encouraging active transportation (non

- motorized transportation, such as bicycling and walking)

 Actively encourage and create incentives for energy efficiency, where possible

 Encourage land use and growth patter ns that facilitate transit and non

- motorized transportation

 Maximize the security of the regional transportation system through improved system monitoring, rapid recovery planning, and coordination with other security agencies

The six 2012

- 2035 RTP/SCS gu iding policies below help focus future investments on the best

performing projects and strategies that seek to preserve, maintain, and optimize the per formance of the existing system

. 1) Transportation investments shall be based on SCAG‟s adopted regional Performance Indicators 2) Ensuring safety, adequate maintenance, and efficiency of operations on the existing multimodal transportation system should be the highest RTP/SCS priorities for any incremental funding in the region 3) RTP/SCS land use and growth strat egies in the RTP/SCS will respect local input and advance smart growth initiatives 4) Transportation demand management (TDM) and non

- motorized transportation will be focus areas, subject to Policy 1

## Final 2012 AQMP Appendix IV

- C

IV

- C

- 8 5) HOV gap closures that significantly increase transit and rid eshare usage will be supported and encouraged, subject to Policy 1 6) Monitoring progress on all aspects of the Plan, including the timely implementation of projects, programs, and strategies, will be an important and integral component of the Plan Transporta tion Investments

The RTP/SCS contains a host of improvements to the regional multimodal transportation system. These improvements include closures of critical gaps in the network that hinder access to certain parts of the region, as well as the strategic expansion of our transportation system where there is room to grow in order to provide the region with the mobility it needs.

Active Transportation Component : $6.7 billion will be invested in various active transportation strategies to increase bikeways in the SCAG region from 4,315 miles to 10,122 miles, bring significant amount of sidewalks into compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), safety improvements, and various other strategies.

Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Component : $4.5 billion will be invested in various TDM strategies to incentivize drivers to reduce solo driving: (1) Increase carpooling and vanpooling; (2) Increase the use of transit, bicycling, and walking; (3) Redistribute vehicle trips from peak periods to non

- peak periods by shifting work times/days/locations; (4) Encourage greater use of telecommuting; and (5) Other “first mile/last mile” strategies to allow travelers to easily connect to and from transit service at their origin and destination. These strategi es include the development of mobility hubs around major transit stations, the integration of bicycling and transit through folding

- bikes

- on

- buses programs, triple bike racks on buses, and dedicated racks on light and heavy rail vehicles.

Transportation Sy stem Management (TSM) Component : $7.6 billion will be invested in various TSM strategies to enhanced incident management, advanced ramp metering, traffic signal synchronization, advanced traveler information, improved data collection, universal transit far e cards (Smart Cards), and Transit Automatic Vehicle Location (AVL) to increase traffic flow and reduce congestion.

Transit Component : A total of $55 .0 billion will be invested in (1) bus rapid transit (BRT)

- new BRT routes, extensions, and/or service enh ancements in Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino, and Ventura Counties; (2) light rail transit

- new light rail and commuter rail routes/extensions in Los Angeles and San Bernardino Counties; (3) heavy rail transit

– heavy rail extension in Los Angeles County; and (4) bus

- new and expanded bus service in Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino, and Ventura Counties.

Passenger and High

- Speed Rail Component : A total of $5 1.8 billion will be invested in (1) commuter rail

- Metrolink extensio ns in Riverside County and Metrolink system

- wide improvements to provide higher speeds; and (2) high speed rail

- improvements to the Los Angeles to San Diego (LOSSAN) Rail Corridor with an ultimate goal of providing San Diego

Los Angeles express service i n under two hours, and Phase I of the California High

- Speed Train (HST) project that would provide high

- speed service from the Kern County line to Anaheim via

## Final 2012 AQMP Appendix IV

- C

IV

- C

- 9 L.A. Union Station with stops in Palmdale, San Fernando Valley, L.A. Union Station, Norwalk and A naheim

. Goods Movement (includes Grade Separations) Component : $48.4 billion will be invested in various goods movement strategies including Port access improvements, freight rail enhancements, grade separations, truck mobility improvements including an Ea st

- West Freight Corridor, intermodal facilities, and support of emission

- reduction strategies such as the deployment of commercially available lower

- emission trucks and locomotives in the near term while taking critical steps (including technology demonstr ation projects) toward the phased implementation of a zero

- and near

- zero emission freight system.

Aviation and Airport Ground Access Component : As included in their respective modal investments, substantial investment will be made in various airport groun d access improvements including rail extensions and improvements to provide easier access to airports, and new express bus service from remote terminals to airports.

Highways Component : $64.2 billion will be invested in (1) toll facilities

- closure of cri tical gaps in the highway network to provide access to all parts of the region ($27.3 billion); (2) High

Occupancy Vehicle (HOV)/High

- Occupancy Toll (HOT)

- closure of gaps in the HOV lane network and the addition of freeway

- to

- freeway direct HOV connector s to complete Southern California‟s HOV network and a connected network of Express/HOT lanes ($20.9 billion); and (3) mixed flow

– i nterchange improvements to and closures of critical gaps in the highway network to provide access to all parts of the region ($16.0 billion).

Arterials Component : $22.1 billion will be invested in various arterial improvements including spot widening, signal prioritization, driveway consolidations and relocations, grade separations at high

- volume intersections, new bicycle lane s, and other design features such as lighting, landscaping, and modified roadway, parking, and sidewalk widths.

Operations and Maintenance Component : $216.9 billion will be invested in the operations and maintenance of transit ($139.3 billion), highways ($56.7 billion), and arterials ($20.9 billion) to preserve our multimodal system in a good state of repair.

Financial Plan

The 2012

– 2035 RTP/SCS financial plan identifies how much money is available to support the region‟s transportation investments. The plan includes a core revenue forecast of existing local, state, and federal sources along with funding sources that are reasonably available over the time horizon of the RTP/SCS. These new sources include adjustments to state and federal gas tax rates ba sed on historical trends and recommendations from two national commissions (National Surface Transportation Policy and Revenue Study Commission and National Surface Transportation Infrastructure Financing Commission) created by Congress, further leveraging of existing local sales tax measures, value capture strategies, potential national freight program/freight fees, as well as passenger and commercial vehicle tolls for specific facilities. Reasonably available revenues also include innovative financing str ategies, such as private equity participation. In accordance with federal guidelines, the plan includes strategies for ensuring the availability of these sources.

## Final 2012 AQMP Appendix IV

- C

IV

- C

- 10 Sustainable Communities Strategy

Under SB 375, the primary goal of the SCS is to provide a vision for future growth in Southern California that will decrease per capita greenhouse gas emissions from automobiles and light trucks. T his leads to strategies that can help reduce per capita ve hicle miles traveled over the next 25 years. The strategies contained in the 2012

– 2035 RTP/SCS will produce benefits for the region far beyond simply reducing GHG emissions. Because it is the latest refinement of an evolving regional blueprint that SCAG be gan in 2000, the 2012

– 2035 RTP/SCS will help the region contend with many ongoing issues across a wide range of concerns, including better placemaking, lower cost to taxpayers and families, benefits to public health and environment, greater responsiveness to changing demographic s and housing market s , and improved access and mobility.

The 2012

– 2035 RTP/SCS was built primarily from local General Plans and input from local governments using the Local Sustainability Planning Tool, from the subregional COGs and from the County Transportation Commissions. A review of local plans and subregional strategies points to the common ground that is inherent in SCAG‟s 2008 Advisory Land Use Policies. The advisory land use policies are a foundation for the overall regiona l land use development pattern:

 Identify regional strategic areas for infill and investment

– Identify strategic opportunity areas for infill development of aging and underutilized areas and increased investment in order to accommodate future growth.

 Stru cture the plan on a three

- tiered system of centers development

– Identify strategic centers based on a three

- tiered system of existing, planned, and potential, relative to transportation infrastructure.

 Develop “complete communities”

– Create mixed

- use dis tricts, or “complete communities,” in strategic growth areas through a concentration of activities with housing, employment, and a mix of retail and services, located in close proximity to each other.

 Develop nodes on a corridor

– Intensify nodes along cor ridors with people

- scaled, mixed

use developments.

 Plan for additional housing and jobs near transit

– Support and improve transit use and ridership by creating pedestrian

- friendly environments and more compact development patterns in close proximity to tr ansit.

 Plan for a changing demand in types of housing

– Address shifts in the labor force that will likely induce a demand shift in the housing market for additional development types such as multifamily and infill housing in central locations, which will appeal to the needs and lifestyles of these large populations.

 Continue to protect stable, existing single

- family areas

– Continue to protect stable, existing single

- family neighborhoods as future growth and a more diverse housing stock are in infill locat ions near transit stations.

 Ensure adequate access to open space and preservation of habitat

– Ensure access to open space and habitat preservation despite competing quality

- of

- life demands driven by growth, housing and employment needs, and traditional de velopment patterns.

## Final 2012 AQMP Appendix IV

- C

IV

- C

- 11  Incorporate local input and feedback on future growth

– Continue public outreach efforts and incorporate local input through public workshops, scenario planning, and stakeholder outreach.

These policies have evolved over time and serve as the basis for SCAG‟s Compass Blueprint, a regional voluntary program that offers innovative planning tools, creative strategies, and collaborative partnerships to all local governments within the region. Since its inception, Compass Blueprint has suppor ted local d emonstration p rojects that seek to improve mobility for all residents, foster livability in all communities, enable prosperity for all people, and promote sustainability for future generations.

The SCS strives to integrate the transportation ne twork and related strategies with an overall land use pattern that responds to projected growth, housing needs, changing demographics, and transportation demands. The regional vision of the SCS maximizes current voluntary local efforts that support the goa ls of SB 375, as evidenced by several Compass Blueprint d emonstration p rojects and various county transportation improvements. The SCS focuses the majority of new housing and job growth in high

- quality transit areas and other opportunity areas in existing main streets, downtowns, and commercial corridors, resulting in an improved jobs

housing balance and more opportunity for transit

- oriented development. This overall land use development pattern supports and complements the proposed transportation network t hat emphasizes system preservation, active transportation, and transportation demand management

measures. T he RTP/SCS fully integrates the two subregional SCSs prepared by the Gateway Cities and Orange County Council of Governments.

In addition to Compass Blueprint, cities and counties within the SCAG region continue to implement their own local land use and transportation projects that support the goals of the 2012

– 2035 RTP/SCS.

To achieve the goals of the 2012

– 2035 RTP/SCS, public agencies at all levels of government may implement a wide range of strategies that focus on four key areas:

 A Land Use growth pattern that accommodates the region‟s future employment and housing needs and protects sensitive habitat and natural resource areas;

 A Transportation Ne twork that consists of public transit, highways, local streets, bikeways, and walkways;

 Transportation Demand Management (TDM) measures that reduce peak

- period demand on the transportation network; and

 Transportation System Management (TSM) measures that m aximize the efficiency of the transportation network.

In addition, SCAG is a strategic partner in a regional effort to accelerate fleet conversion to zero

and near

- zero emission transportation technologies. SCAG‟s policy with regard to alternative fuels is technology neutral and does not favor any one technology over any other. To accommodate the anticipated increase in alternative fueled vehicles, a significant expansion of infrastructure is needed throughou t the region, among other preparedness steps.

## Final 2012 AQMP Appendix IV

- C

IV

- C

- 12 SB 375 provides incentives in the form of CEQA streamlining to encourage community design that supports reduction in per capita GHG emissions. Generally, two types of projects are eligible for streamlined CEQ A review once a compliant RTP/SCS has been adopted: (1) residential/ mixed

- use projects (consistent with the SCS) or (2) a Transit Priority Project (TPP).

Regional Transportation Emissions

Based on the data generated from SCAG‟s Regional Travel Demand Mod el (e.g., traffic volumes, vehicle speeds, transit ridership, etc.), an estimate of emissions associated with on

- road mobile sources can be generated using CARB‟s emission factor model (EMFAC). Through this process, future emissions from on

- road mobile so urces can be compared for the regional transportation system assuming implementation of the RTP/SCS versus a baseline case without RTP/SCS implementation. It is generally understood that potential future improvements in air quality deriving from the RTP/S CS will likely be much smaller, since motor vehicle emissions have and will continue to be substantially reduced through technology (i.e., emission standards for new engines and in

- use standards for existing fleets). Table 1 below compares VOC (ROG)

, NOx, and PM2.5 emissions between implementation of the 2012

- 2035 RTP/SCS and the baseline without the regional transportation strategy for 2014 and 2035.

Table 1 Regional Transportation Emissions (annual average) (tons per day) *

Note: * Calculated with EMFAC2007; ** Does not include fugitive dust calculations



## Transportation Control Measures

TCMs are measures that are specifically identified and committed to in the applicable implementation plan that are either one of the types listed in CAA section 108, or any other measures for the purpose of reducing emissions or concentrations of air pollu tants from transportation sources by reducing vehicle use or changing traffic flow or congestion conditions. Vehicle technology

- based, fuel

- based, and maintenance

- based measures which control the emissions from vehicles under fixed traffic conditions are n ot TCMs. TCMs in this plan include the following three main categories of transportation improvement projects and programs:

 High occupancy vehicle (HOV) measures,

 Transit and systems management measures, and VOC (ROG) NOx PM 2.5 

## **

2014 2035 2014 2035 2014 2035

2012 RTP/SCS 137.5 70.9 285.9 119.6 15.2 14.2

2012 RTP Baseline 137.6 72.8 285.5 124.8 15.2 15.6

RTP/SCS Reduction

- 0.1

- 1.9

- 0.4

- 5.2 0.0

- 1.4

## Final 2012 AQMP Appendix IV

- C

IV

- C

- 13  Information

- based transportation strategies.

Th e 2012

- 2035 RTP/SCS includes TCM type projects throughout the entire Plan horizon (i.e., 2035) and are all part of the regional transportation strategy for the 2012 South Coast PM2.5 AQMP. Those TCM type projects which have funding programmed for right of way or construction in the first two years of the prevailing FTIP are considered committed for air quality planning purposes in the applicable SIP. Attachment A of this Appendix illustrates the currently committed TCMs that are derived from the TCM proje cts of the 2011 FTIP, as amended.

TCM Emissions Reduction Benefits T o estimate the emission benefits of TCMs

, the socio

economic data variables of the 2012

- 2035 RTP/SCS were held constant while the transportation network was modified to account for the TCMs in the Plan ( both TCM

- type projects and committed TCMs)

. In other words, the TCM emissions reduction benefits are the difference between the 2012

- 2035 RTP/SCS which includes TCMs and the AQM P baseline which is defined as R TP minus TCMs. It should be noted that this analysis is done for illustrative purposes as the regional transportation strategy is appropriately viewed on a systems

- level basis, and not by its components since each of the ind ividual transportation improvements and strategies affect each other and the system.

C ompared to previous AQMPs/SIPs, potential future improvements in air quality deriving from TCMs is consistently diminishing for two reasons. On one hand , motor vehicle e missions have and will continue to be substantially reduced through technology. On the other hand , most of the TCM projects in the South Coast Air Basin were adopted into the SIP to meet the one

- hour ozone standard by 2010 and have already been implemente d. Thus, the emission reductions associated with these projects are now included in the baseline emissions and no longer show up in the TCM benefit values. Table 2 s hows the results of the TCM modeling analys i s for years 2014

, 20 19 , and 2023.

Table 2 TCM Emissions ( annual average ) (tons per day) *

Note: * Calculated with EMFAC2007; ** Does not include fugitive dust calculations 

## VOC (ROG) NOx PM 2.5 

## **

2014 2019 2023 2014 2019 2023 2014 2019 2023

2012 RTP/SCS 137.5 110.7 93.7 285.9 194.1 157.7 15.2 14.8 13.5

RTP/SCS without TCM 137.8 111.1 94.4 286.6 195.5 159.2 15.3 15.1 13.9

TCM Reduction

- 0.3

- 0.4

- 0.7

- 0.7

- 1.4

- 1.5

- 0.1

- 0.3

- 0.4

## Final 2012 AQMP Appendix IV

- C

IV

- C

- 14 Section I II

. Reasonably Available Control Measure Analysis

Introduction

Clean Air Act Section 172(c)( 1) requires SIPs to provide for the implementation of all reasonably available control measures (RACM) as expeditiously as practicable. Guidance on interpreting RACM requirements in the context of the 1990 Amendments was set forth in the General Preamble (57 FR 13498, 13560) in 1992. In the General Preamble, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) interpreted section 172(c)(1) as imposing a duty on States to consider all available control measures and to adopt and implement measures that are reasonably available for implementation in a specific nonattainment area. It also retained an earlier interpretation of RACM that it would not be reasonable to require the implementation of measures that do not advance the date for attainment.

With regard to TCMs , EPA revised earlier guidance by indicating that it is inappropriate to presume that all Section 108(f)(1)(A) measures of the CAA are available in all nonattainment areas. Instead, States should consider Section 108(f)(1)(A) measures as potential options that are not exhaustive, but indicative of the types of measures that should be considered. In addition, any measure identified as reasonably available during the public comment period should also be considered for implementation. EPA indicated that Sta tes could reject measures as not reasonably available for reasons related to local conditions. States are required to justify why available measures were not considered RACM and not adopted in the SIP.

To meet the RACM requirements articulated in the EP A guidance described above, this RACM analysis was performed using several steps. First is a description of the process by which SCAG and related transportation agencies in the South Coast Air Basin identify, review, and make enforceable commitments to im plement TCMs. Second is the assembly and review of a list of control measures recently implemented in other ozone nonattainment areas. This effort involved a review of measures implemented in California nonattainment areas as well as those located in Ari zona, Colorado, Georgia, New York, Texas, and Washington D.C. , and the organization of those measures in the 16 categories specified in CAA Section 108(f). The third step is to determine RACM measures by contrasting the list of candidate measures with meas ures implemented to date in the South Coast Air Basin, as well as any new commitments in the current AQMP. The fourth step is to provide a reasoned justification for any of the available measures that have yet to be implemented. These justifications must address criteria described in the above

- cited guidance.

SCAG RACM / TCM Development Process

While the SCAG Region has an extensive, systematic TCM development program continually updated through the FTIP process, areas are obligated during SIP preparation t o evaluate TCMs and determine whether they qualify as RACM.

The RACM process relies predominantly on the continuous updating and addition process for TCMs in the South Coast Air Basin . The TCM process was established for the South Coast Air Basin by rep lacing a process that developed TCMs each time a SIP was produced with a

## Final 2012 AQMP Appendix IV

- C

IV

- C

- 15 continuous ongoing TCM process. This process continues to govern the selection and implementation of TCMs today. TCMs are continuously identified and reviewed throughout the transpo rtation planning process. SCAG‟s ongoing public outreach effort, including an involved interagency input process via the TCWG, helps ensure that the process to identify and review TCMs is robust, inclusive, and comprehensive. Development of TCMs arises f rom multiple processes and multiple sources, which include CTCs, subregional agencies, task forces, committees, and the public. These funding and scheduling incentives ensure that TCMs are developed, sponsored, and clearly identified throughout the proces s.
Assembly and Review of Candidate RACM

EPA and related court decisions have maintained that TCMs considered RACM must be measures that 1) advance the attainment date, typically by at least one year and 2) are technologically and economically feasible. Measures must pass both the advance attainment and technical/economic feasibility tests to be deemed RACM.

U.S. EPA guidance documents provide help in identifying the type of measures to be considered. CAA Section 108(f)(1)(A) provides a list of sixteen categories of TCMs that are potential options that should be considered indicative types of control measures:

i. Programs for improved use of public transit;
ii. Restriction of certain roads or lanes to, or construction of such roads or lanes for use by,
passenge r buses or high occupancy vehicles;
iii. Employer

- based transportation management plans, including incentives;
iv. Trip

- reduction ordinances;

v. Traffic flow improvement programs that achieve emission reductions;
vi. Fringe and transportation corridor parking facilities, serving multiple occupancy vehicle programs or transit service;
vii. Programs to limit or restrict vehicle use in downtown areas or other areas of emission concentration, particularly during periods of peak use;
viii. Programs for the provision of all forms of high

- o ccupancy, shared

- ride services, such as the pooled use of vans;
ix. Programs to limit portions of road surfaces or certain sections of the metropolitan area to the use of non

- motorized vehicles or pedestrian use, both as to time and place;

x. Programs for secure bicycle storage facilities and other facilities, including bicycle lanes, for the convenience and protection of bicyclists, in both public and private areas;
xi. Programs to control extended idling of vehicles;
xii. Programs to reduce motor vehicle emissions, consi stent with Title II of the Clean Air Act, which are caused by extreme cold start conditions;
xiii. Employer

- sponsored programs to permit flexible work schedules;
xiv. Programs and ordinances to facilitate non

- automobile travel, provision and utilization of

mass trans it, and to generally reduce the need for single

- occupant vehicle travel, as part of transportation planning and development efforts of a locality, including programs and

## Final 2012 AQMP Appendix IV

- C

IV

- C

- 16 ordinances applicable to new shopping centers, special events, and other centers of

ve hicle activity;

xv. Programs for new construction and major reconstruction of paths, tracks or areas solely for the use by pedestrian or other non

- motorized means of transportation, when economically feasible and in the public interest; and
xvi. Programs to encoura ge the voluntary removal from use and the marketplace of pre

- 1980 model year light duty vehicles and pre

- 1980 model light duty trucks.

EPA guidance has emphasized that these sixteen measures are an illustrative, but not exhaustive list. Instead, TCMs ne ed to be evaluated on an area

- by

- area basis to determine which are reasonably available. In addition to the measures listed above, the 1992 General Preamble of the CAA cite other sources to include TCMs that were a) suggested during public comments (e.g. at workshops, public hearings, in written comments, etc.); b) adopted in other nonattainment areas of the country; and c) specifically identified by the EPA (i.e. EPA TCM database, support documents for rulemaking, etc.). 2



## To develop a list of candidate RACM, SCAG performed a comprehensive review of available TCMs in California, as well as in other states. SCAG reexamined the candidate RACM identified during the comprehensive RACM analysis performed for the 2007 AQMP. Addi tionally, SCAG coordinated with other MPOs and air quality districts to identify measures that are being implemented in the following other nonattainment areas:

 Maricopa County, Arizona : Maricopa Association of Governments. Eight

- Hour Ozone Resignation Req uest and Maintenance Plan for the Maricopa Nonattainment Area, February, 2009.

 Bay Area, California : Bay Area Air Quality Management District. Revised San Francisco Bay Area Ozone Attainment Plan for the 1

- Hour National Ozone Standard, October 24, 2001.

 Sa cramento, California : Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District. Sacramento Regional 8

- Hour Ozone Attainment and RFP Plan, December 19, 2008. EPA approval pending.

 San Joaquin Valley, California : San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control Dis trict. 2007 Ozone Plan, April 30, 2007.

 Denver Metropolitan Area, Colorado : North Front Range Metropolitan Organization. Denver Metro Area and North Front Range Ozone Action Plan, December 12, 2008.

 Atlanta Metropolitan Area, Georgia : Georgia Department of Natural Resources, Environmental Protection Division. Proposed Georgia‟s State Implementation Plan for the Atlanta 8

- Hour Ozone Nonattainment Area, March 26, 2009. EPA approval pending.

 New York Metropolitan Area, New York : New York State Department of En vironmental Conservation Ozone (8

- Hour NAAQS) Attainment Demonstration for NY Metro Area, August 9, 2007.

 Dallas

- Fort Worth Area, Texas : Texas Commission on Environmental Quality. Revisions to the State of Texas Air Quality Implementation Plan for the Co ntrol of Ozone

2 Seitz, John S. (December 2

, 1999 )

. Memo from John Seitz: Guidance on the Re asonably Available Control Measures (RACM) Requirement and Attainment Demonstration Submissions for Ozone Nonattainment Areas. Available at: http://www.epa.gov/ttn/oarpg/t1/memoranda/rev racm.pdf

.

## Final 2012 AQMP Appendix IV

- C

IV

- C

- 17 Air Pollution, Dallas

- Forth Worth 8

- Hour Ozone Nonattainment Area, December 7, 2011. EPA approval pending.

 Houston

- Galveston Area, Texas : Texas Commission on Environmental Quality. Revisions to the State of Texas Air Quality Implementation Plan for the Control of Ozone Air Pollution, Houston

- Galveston

- Brazoria 1997 8

- Hour Ozone Nonattainment Area, March 10, 2010. EPA approval pending.

 Washington D

. C

. : Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments (MWCOG). Plan to Improve Air Quality in the Metropolitan Washington, DC

- MD

- VA Region: State Implementation Plan (SIP) for 8

- Hour Ozone Standard, May 23, 2007.

Additionally, TCMs were discussed and reviewed at numerous TCWG meetings as part of the 2011 F TIP

, 2012

- 2035 RTP/SCS, and 2012 AQMP

. Further, SCAG has an extensive and robust public participation process for the development of the RTP/ F TIP through ongoing public meetings, and technical, advisory, and policy committees. These groups generally meet on a monthly basis and provide explicit opportunities for the public to participate and contribute.

In summary, SCAG performed the RACM analysis based on information reviewed from the following sources:

 CAA Section 108(f)(1)(A)

 2007 South Coast AQMP RACM Analysis

 Other nonattainment areas in Ca lifornia

 Other nonattainment areas outside California

 RTP/ F TIP Updates

 Interagency Consultation (TCWG)

The candidate measures were reviewed to determine which can be considered RACM. As discussed above, the RACM TCM requirement consists of two core cri teria that must be satisfied: 1) TCMs must advance attainment of the air quality standards; and 2) TCMs must be both technically and economically feasible. EPA has not provide d specific definitions on these core criteria, but has preferred to allow flexibility in each region‟s determination.

I n practice, agencies have based their determination of the first criteria on whether a measure or group of measures would help an area ac hieve attainment one year earlier than in the absence of the measure or group of measures. In other words, TCM implementation must significantly reduce emissions to facilitate attainment of the NAAQS one year earlier than without the TCMs. Considering th e magnitude of the emissions reductions necessary to demonstrate attainment in the South Coast Air Basin, the implementation of TCMs is not expected to meet this criterion. T echnical feasibility has been determined in terms of local factors, such as envir onmental impacts, availability of control measures, and ability to achieve the emission reductions. P roject
cost

- effectiveness has been considered a determining factor to determine economic feasibility

.

## Final 2012 AQMP Appendix IV

- C

IV

- C

- 18 Determining RACM Measures

For this step of the RA CM analysis, SCAG compared the list measures implemented within the South Coast Air Basin with those implemented in other areas. SCAG then organized measures, including candidate measures and those measures currently implemented in the region, according
t o the sixteen categories specified in Section 108(f)(1)(A) of the CAA. No formal requirement exists on how to organize TCMs. However, SCAG utilized this organization scheme as a way to highlight those measures that fall within the sixteen CAA categories, which are formally recognized as "TCMs" and subject to CAA and federal conformity requirements. SCAG found a small number of candidate measures that were not currently implemented in the region and not included in the 2007 AQMP RACM analysis. In additio n, a new category titled “Other Measures and Programs” was added to the list of measures. This category includes TCMs that do not fall in any of the sixteen Section 108(f) categories. New measures that were in addition to those reviewed as part of the 20 07 RACM analysis were highlighted in bold font as shown in Attachment B

. For this RACM analysis, SCAG also reviewed statewide and South Coast AQMD measures that have been adopted since the last RACM analysis. Although these measures are out of the realm of SCAG‟s funding authority, they are discussed below for completeness. Statewide mobile source measures are also covered in California RACM analysis completed for the latest ozone SIP revision for the South Coast Air Basin. Table 3 shows on

- road TCMs a nd mobile source measures that were adopted by the ARB and are currently being implemented in the SCAG region.

Table 3 Adopted California Transportation Control Measures

RACM Implementing Nonattainment Area Implemented in SCAG?
California Diesel Fuel Regulation ARB Yes
On

- Road Heavy

- Duty Diesel Vehicles Regulation ARB Yes
California Reformulated Gasoline ARB Yes Low Emission Vehicle Standards (LEV II) ARB Yes Transportation Refrigeration Unit ATCM ARB Yes School Bus Idling ATCM ARB Yes
Fleet Rule for Transit Agencies ARB Yes Drayage Truck Regulation ARB Yes Hybrid Truck and Bus Voucher Incentive Program ARB Yes Clean Vehicle Rebate Project ARB Yes
Solid Waste Collection Vehicle Rule ARB Yes Heavy

- Duty Vehicle Inspection Program ARB/BAR Yes Periodic Smoke Inspection Program ARB/BAR Yes School Bus Retrofit Program ARB/SCAQMD Yes Goods Movement Program/Proposition 1B ARB/CTC/SCAQMD Yes

## Final 2012 AQMP Appendix IV

- C

IV

- C

- 19 Reasoned Justification

The fourth step is to provide a reasoned justification for any of the available measures that have yet to be implemented or will not be implemented. In 1999, EPA issued a memorandum entitled “Guidance on the Reasonably Available Control Measures Requirement and Attainment Demonstration Submissions for Ozone Nonattainment Areas.” 3 

## I n this memorandum, EPA states that in order to determine whether a state has adopted all RACM necessary for attainment and as expeditiously as practicable, the state must explain why the selected implementation schedule is the earliest schedule based on th e circumstances of the area. This indicated that States could reject measures as not reasonably available for reasons related to local conditions. In such cases, States are obligated to provide justification as to why potentially reasonable measures have not been adopted. Valid reasons for rejecting a measure include that it would not advance the attainment date, it is economically infeasible, or it is technologically infeasible.

The complete listing of all candidate measures evaluated for RACM determi nation is included in Attachment B . A “Measure Number” is assigned for each strategy for ease of discussion (not rank in priority). The “Description” column provides a brief description of the relevant measure in discussion. “Has It Been Implemented?” co nfirms whether the measure is currently implemented in the SCAG region. The final column “Reasoned Justification for Not Implementing” provides a reasoned justification for those measures that were not considered RACM. SCAG appropriately considered a num ber of factors that included technical and economic feasibility, enforceability, geographic applicability, and ability to provide emission reductions. Of the TCMs that were deemed candidate measures, none were found to meet the criteria for RACM implement ation.

Conclusion

CAA Section 172(c)(1) requires SIPs to provide for the implementation of all RACM as “expeditiously as practicable.” EPA and related court decisions have maintained that TCMs considered RACM must be measures that 1) advance the attainment date, typically by at least one year and 2) are technologically and economically feasible. Measures must pass both the advance attainment and technical/economic feasibility tests to be deemed RACM.

Based on a comprehensive review of TCM projects in other nonattainment a reas or otherwise identified, it is determined that the TCMs being implemented in the South Coast Air Basin are inclusive of all RACM. None of the candidate measures reviewed herein and determined to be infeasible meets the criteria for RACM implementatio n.
SCAG and the local transportation agencies have in place a comprehensive, formal process for identifying, evaluating, and selecting TCMs. The regular RTP, F TIP, and AQMP/SIP public update processes ensure that TCM identification and implementation is a routine consideration that helps SCAG and the AQMD demonstrate attainment of applicable NAAQS.

3 Seitz, John S. (December 2, 1999 )

. Memo from John Seitz: Guidance on the Reasonably Available Control Measures (RACM) Requirement and Attainment Demonstration Submissions for Ozone Nonattainment Areas

. Available at: http://www.epa.gov/ttn/oarpg/t1/memoranda/revracm.pdf

## Final 2012 AQMP Appendix IV

- C

Attachment A: Committed Transportation Control Measures (TCMs)

IV

- C

- 20 Los Angeles County

Lead Agency Project ID Project Description Completion Date

BALDWIN PARK LAFA141 BALDWIN PARK METROLI NK TRANSPORTATION CE NTER. FUNDED THRU ST IP AUGMENTATION CONSTRUCTION A TRANS PORTATION CENTER AND PARKING STRUCTURE AT THE BALDWIN PARK METROLINK STATION. 11/1/2014

FOOTHILL TRANSIT ZON E LA0B311 PARK AND RIDE FACILI TY TRANSIT ORIENTED NEI GHBORHOOD PROGRAM SA FETEA

- LU # 341 (E

2006

- BUSP

- 092) (E

- 2006

- BUSP

- 173) 12/31/2013

GLENDALE LA0G406 FAIRMONT AVE. PARK

- N

- RIDE FACILITY (83 PA RKING SPACES) TO SER VE COMMUTERS USING S R

134, I

- 5. THE LOCATION OF T HE PARK

- N

- RIDE IS FAIRMONT AVENUE AND SAN FERNA NDO RD. 12/30/2013

LOS ANGELES COUNTY LAF1514 EMERALD NECKLACE BIK E TRAIL PROJECT. DES IGN AND CONSTRUCT 1. 1 MILES OF CLASS I B IKE PATH TO CONNECT DUAR TE ROAD TO THE SAN G ABRIEL RIVER BICYCLE TRAIL. 6/30/2013

LOS ANGELES COUNTY M TA LA0G270 EXPANSION AND IMPROV EMENT TO EXISTING TR ANSIT CENTER IN THE CITY OF PALMDALE. E2 009

- BUSP

- 137. 9/30/2013

LOS ANGELES COUNTY M TA LA0F021 EXPOSITION LIGHT RAI L TRANSIT SYSTEM PHA SE II

– FROM CULVER CITY TO SANTA MONICA 12/31/2017

LOS ANGELES COUNTY MTA LA29202W MID

- CITY TRANSIT CORRIDO R: WILSHIRE BLVD. FR OM VERMONT TO SANTA MONICA DOWNTOWN

- MID

- CITY WILSHIRE BRT IN CL. DIV. EXPANSION A ND BUS ONLY LANE 12/31/2014

LOS ANGELES COUNTY M TA LA0G194 ACQUIRE FOUR (4) ALT ERNATE FUEL BUSES FO R THE CITY OF ARTESIA TO BE USED F OR NEW FIXED ROUTE SERVICE EARMARK ID #E2008

- BUSP

- 0694 10/31/2012

LOS ANGELES COUNTY M TA LA0C10 MID

- CITY/EXPOSITION CORR IDOR LIGHT RAIL TRAN SIT PROJECT PHASE I TO VENICE

- ROBERTSON STATION 12/31/2012

LOS ANGELES COUNTY M TA LA0G431 MULT I

- MODAL TRANSIT CENTER AT CSUN TO INCLUDE P ASSENGER LOADING ARE AS AND BUS SHELTERS 10/1/2012

LOS ANGELES COUNTY M TA LA974165 MACARTHUR PARK STATI ON IMPROVEMENTS INCL UDE DESIGN AND CONST RUCTION OF A PLAZA TO ACCOMMODATE PUBLI C ACCESS (PEDESTRIAN ENTRANCES, WALKWAYS, BICYCLE FA CILITIES) PPNO# 3417 12/30/2011

LOS ANGELES, CITY OF LA0G155 LACRD

– TRANSIT SIGNAL PRIOR ITY IN THE CITY OF L OS ANGELES. 02/28/2012

## Final 2012 AQMP Appendix IV

- C

Attachment A: Committed Transportation Control Measures (TCMs)

IV

- C

- 21 Los Angeles County

Lead Agency Project ID Project Description Completion Date

PASADENA LAE3790 THE PASADENA ITS INT EGRATES 3 COMPONENTS ; TRAFFIC SIGNAL COM MUNICATION AND CONTRL, TRANSIT VEHICLE ARRI VAL INFO AND PUBLIC PARKING AVAILABILITY INFO. SAFETEA

LU PRJ #3790 AND #39 9 6/30/2013

PICO RIVERA (PREVIOU SLY LEAD AGENCY WAS SGVCOG) LA0C57 ACE/GATEWAY CITIES

- CONSTRUCT GRADE SEP. AT PASSONS BLVD IN P ICO RIVERA (& MODIFY PROFILE OF SERAPIS AV,)(PART OF ALAMEDA CORR EAST PR OJ.)SAFETEA

- LU HPP # 1666 (TCRP #54.3) 12/31/2012

ROLLING HILLS ESTATE LAF1529 PALOS VERDES DRIVE N ORTH BIKE LANES. CON STRUCTION OF CLASS I I BIKE LANE AND RELA TED IMPROVEMENTS ON PALO S VERDES DRIVE NORTH 12/31/2013

SANTA CLARITA LAF1424 MCBEAN REGIONAL TRAN SIT CENTER PARK AND RIDE. PURCHASE LAND, DESIGN, AND CONSTRUCT A REGIONAL PARK

- AND

- RIDE LOT ADJACENT TO THE MCBEAN REGIONAL TRANSIT CENTER IN THE CITY O F SANTA CLARITA. 10/1/2013

WHITTIER LA0G257 WHITTIER GREENWAY TRAILHEAD P ARK. EXTENSION OF WH ITTIER GREENWAY TRAI L FROM MILLS AVENUE TO 300 FEET EAST OF MILLS A VENUE ON CITY OWNED RIGHT

- OF

- WAY IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE CONSTRUCTION OF NEW TRAILHEAD PARK WITH A PARK AND RIDE PARKING LOT FOR NEAR BY PUBLIC TRANSI T STOP. NEW 20 SPACE PARKING LOT WOULD BE CONSTRUCTED OF “GREE N” PERMEABLE PAVEMEN T IN COMPLIANCE WITH NPDES REQUIREMENTS. INCLUD ES THE INSTALLATION OF PARK AMENITIES, D RINKING FOUNTAIN FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF P EDESTRIAN AND BICYCL E PATRONS OF THE WHI TTIER GREENWAY TRAIL. CONSTRUCTION OF NEW SIDEWALKS ALONG MILL S AVENUE TO PROVIDE WHITTIER GREENWAY TRAIL CROSSING CONNE CTION AT THE SIGNALI ZED INTERSECTION OF MILLS AVENUE AT LAMBERT ROAD. 9/30/2014

ARTESIA LAF1607 SOUTH STREET PEDESTR IAN, BIKEWAY AND TRA NSIT IMPROVEMENT. IMPROVE PEDESTRIAN ENVIRONMENT AND TRAN SIT STOP LOCATIONS W ITH LANDSCAPED MEDIA NS, TRANSIT SHELTERS, BENCHES, S IDEWALK ENHANCEMENTS AND LIGHTING. CLOSE EXISTING BIKE LANE GAP. 10/1/2014

AVALON LAF1501 COUNTY CLUB DRIVE BI KEWAY IMPROVEMENT PR O JECT. CONSTRUCTION O F A 4

- FOOT WIDE CLASS II BIKE LANE I N BOTH DIRECTIONS AL ONG A ONE MILE SECTI ON OF COUNTRY CLUB D RIVE. 10/1/2013

AZUSA LAF3434 AZUSA INTERMODAL TRA NSIT CENTER. CONSTRU CT REGIONAL AZUSA IN TERMODAL TRANSIT CENTER TO ACCOMMODAT E EXISTING AND FUTURE PARKING D EMAND AND SUPPORT EF FECTIVE TRANSIT USE. 6/30/2015

## Final 2012 AQMP Appendix IV

- C

Attachment A: Committed Transportation Control Measures (TCMs)

IV

- C

- 22 Los Angeles County

Lead Agency Project ID Project Description Completion Date

BALDWIN PARK LAE0076 CONSTRUCT ADD‟L VEHI CLE PARKING (200 TO 400 SPACES), BICYCLE PARKING LOT AND PEDESTRIAN REST AREA AT THE TRANSIT CENTE R 12/31/2014

BALDWIN PARK LAF1654 BALDWIN PA RK METROLINK PEDESTR IAN OVERCROSSING. CO NSTRUCT A PEDESTRIAN OVERCROSSING OVER BO GART AVE AND THE MET ROLINK LINE TO LINK THE STATION WITH VITAL BUS TRANSFER P OINTS AND TO PROVIDE ACCESS TO PARKING OV ERFLOW AREAS. 10/1/2015

BURBANK LAF1502 SAN FERNANDO BIKEWAY. IMPLEMENT A CLASS I BIKEWAY ALON G SAN FERNANDO BLVD, VICTORY PLACE AND BU RBANK WESTERN CHANNE L TO COMPLETE THE BU RBANK LEG OF A 12 MILE BIKEWAY. 6/30/2014

CALTRANS LA000358 ROUTE 5:

– FROM ROUTE 134 TO RO UTE 170 HOV LANES (8 TO 10 LANES) (CFP 346)(2001 CFP 8355). (EA# 12180, 12181,12 182,12183,12184, 133 50 PPNO 0142F,151E,3 985,3986,3987) SAFET EA LU # 570. CONSTRUCT MODIFIED I C @ I

- 5 EMPIRE AVE, AUX LN S NB & SB BETWEEN BU RB 12/31/2014

CALTRANS LA000548 ROUTE 10: FROM PUENT E TO CITRUS HOV LANE S F ROM 8 TO 10 LANES (C

- ISTEA 77720) (EA# 11 7080, PPNO# 0309N) 2/12/2016

CALTRANS LA0B875 ROUTE 10: HOV LANES FROM CITRUS TO ROUTE 57/210

– (EA# 11934, PPNO# 03 10B) 3/15/2016

CALTRANS LA0D73 ROUTE 5: LA MIRADA, NORWALK & SANTA FE S PRINGS

- ORANGE CO LINE TO RTE 605 JUNCTION. WIDEN FOR HOV & MIXE D FLOW LNS, RECONSTR UCT VALLEY VIEW (EA 2159A0, PPNO 2808). TCRP#42.2&42.1 12/1/2016

CALTRANS LA000357 ROUTE 5: FROM ROUTE 170 TO ROUTE 118 ONE HOV LANE IN EACH DIR ECTION (10 TO 12 LAN ES) INCLUDING THE RECONS TRUCTION OF THE I

- 5/SR

- 170 MIXED FLOW CONNE CTOR AND THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE I

- 5/SR

- 170 HOV TO HOV CONNE CTOR (CFP 345) (2001 CFP 8339; CFP2197). 12/31/2013

CALTRANS LA01342 ROUTE 10: RT 10 FROM RT 605 TO PUENTE AVE HOV LANES (8+0 TO 8+ 2) (EA# 117070, PPNO 0306H) PPNO 3333 3382 AB 30 90 REP (TCRP #40) 10/28/2013

CALTRANS LA996134 ROUTE 5: RTE. 5/14 I NTERCHANGE & HOV LNS ON RTE 14

– CONSTRUCT 2 ELEVATED LANES

– HOV CONNECTOR (DIRECT CO NNECTORS) (EA# 16800 )(2001 CFP 8343) (PP NO 0168M) 5/24/2013

CLAREMONT LAF1510 CLA REMONT PORTION OF TH E CITRUS REGIONAL BI KEWAY. THIS PROJECT PROPOSES THE IMPLEMENTATION OF TH E CLAREMONT PORTION OF THE CITRUS REGION AL BIKEWAY UTILIZING BONITA AVENUE AND FI RST STREET AS PRIMAR Y CLASS II BIKE ROUT ES. 10/1/2012

## Final 2012 AQMP Appendix IV

- C

Attachment A: Committed Transportation Control Measures (TCMs)

IV

- C

- 23 Los Angeles County

Lead Agency Project ID Project Description Completion Date

EL MONTE LAF1504 EL MONTE: TRANSIT CYCLE FRIEND LY. EL MONTE PROPOSE S TO IMPLEMENT THE 1 ST PHASE OF THE EL MONTE BIKE

- TRANSIT HUB COMPONEN T (METRO BICYCLE TRA NSPORTATION STRATEGI C PLAN) A COUNTYWIDE E FFORT TO IMPROVE BIK E FACILITIES 10/1/2013

LONG BEACH LAE1296 LONG BEACH INTELLIGE N T TRANSPORTATION SYS TEM 9/30/2012

LONG BEACH LAF1530 BICYCLE SYSTEM GAP C LOSURES & IMPROVED L A RIVER BIKE PATH. P ROJECT WILL CONSTRUC T PRIORITY CLASS I & I II BICYCLE SYSTEM GA P CLOSURES IN LONG B EACH AND IMPROVE CONNECTION TO LA RIV ER. 10/1/2014

LOS ANGELES COUNTY MTA LA0D198 CRENSHAW TRANSIT COR RIDOR 12/31/2018

LOS ANGELES COUNTY M TA LA0G010 REGIONAL CONNECTOR

– LIGHT RAIL IN TUNNEL ALLOWING THROUGH MOV EMENTS OF TRAINS, BLUE, GOLD, EXPO LIN ES. FROM ALAMEDA / 1 ST STREET TO 7TH STR EET/METRO CENTER 12/ 31/2019

LOS ANGELES COUNTY M TA LA0G154 LACRD

– EL MONTE TRANSIT CEN TER IMPROVEMENTS AND EL MONTE BUSWAY IMPR OVEMENTS, INCLUDING BIKE LOCKE RS, TICKET VENDING M ACHINES AT EL MONTE BUSWAY STATIONS AND UP TO 10 BUS BAYS. 12/31/2012

LOS ANGELES COUNTY M TA LA0G447 METRO PURPLE LINE WE STSIDE SUBWAY EXTENS ION SEGMENT 1

– WILSHIRE/WESTERN TO FAIRFAX 12/31/2019

LOS ANGELES COUNTY M TA LA0C8114 LA CITY RIDESHARE SE RVICES; PROVIDE COMM UTE INFO, EMPLOYER A SSISTANCE AND INCENTIVE PROGRAMS T HROUGH CORE & EMPLOY ER RID ESHARE SERVICES & MT A INCENTIVE PROGRAMS. PPNO 9003 12/30/2016

LOS ANGELES COUNTY M TA LA963542 ACQUISITION REVENUE VEHICLES

– 2,513 CLEAN FUEL BUS ES: LEASED VEH, FY02 (370) FY03 (30 HC) + FY04 (70 HC) + (20 0 ARTICS); FY05

- FY10 TOTAL OF 1000 B USES. 6/30/20 14

LOS ANGELES COUNTY M TA LAE0036 WILSHIRE/ VERMONT PE DESTRIAN PLAZA IMPRO VEMENTS AND INTERMOD AL PEDESTRIAN LINKAGES 2012

LOS ANGELES COUNTY M TA LAE0195 DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT IMPROVED PEDESTRIAN LINKAGES BETWEEN LOS ANGELES PIERCE COLLEGE AND MTA‟S RA PID BUS TRANSIT STOPS TO INCLUDE PASSENGER AM ENITIES, 2007 CFP # F1658 10/1/2014

## Final 2012 AQMP Appendix IV

- C

Attachment A: Committed Transportation Control Measures (TCMs)

IV

- C

- 24 Los Angeles County

Lead Agency Project ID Project Description Completion Date

LOS ANGELES, CITY OF LA0C8164 EXPOSITION BLVD RIGH T

- OF

- WAY BIKE PATH

- WESTSIDE EXTENSION. DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF 2.5 MILES OF CLASS 1 BIK EWAY, LIGHTING, LAND SCAPING & INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS. (PPNO# 3184) 2/2/2012

LOS ANGELES, CITY OF LAF1704 DOWNTOWN L.A. ALTERN ATIVE GREEN TRANSIT MODES TRIAL PROGRAM. OFFER SHARED RIDE

BICYCLE AND NEIGHBOR HOOD ELECTRIC VEHICL E TRANSIT SERVICES T O LA CITY HALL AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO OVERCROWDED DASH SER VICE 6/27/2014

LOS ANGELES, CITY OF LA002738 BIKEWAY/PEDESTRIAN B RIDGE OVER LA RIVER AT TAYLOR YARD CLASS I (CFP 738, 2077) (P PNO# 3156) 7/31/2015

LOS ANGELES, CITY OF LA0B7330 SAN FERNANDO RD ROW BIKE PATH PHSE II

– CONSTRUCT 2.75 MI LES CLAS I FRM FIRST ST TO BRANFORD ST,ON MTA

- OWND ROW PARLEL TO S AN FERNANDO RD. LINK CYCLSTS TO NUMEROUS BUS LNE. PPNO 2868. 1/30/2014

LOS ANGELES, CITY OF LAF1450 ENCINO PARK

- AND

- RIDE FACILITY RENOVA TION. RENOVATION OF THE ENCINO PARK

- AND

- RIDE FACILITY IN ORDER TO ADDRESS PHYSICAL AND STRUCTU RAL DEFICIENCIES AND ADD CAPACITY TO THIS HEAVILY UTIL IZED FACILITY. INCLU DES 50 NEW PARKING S PACES AND BIKE LOCKE RS. 10/1/2013

LOS ANGELES, CITY OF LAF1520 IMPERIAL HIGHWAY BIK E LANES. THIS PROJEC T INVOLVES THE MO DIFICATION OF THE ME DIAN ISLAND AND THE WIDEN ING OF IMPERIAL HIGH WAY ALONG 1000 FT EA ST OF PERSHING DRIVE TO ACCOMMODATE BIKE LAN ES. 6/1/2014

LOS ANGELES, CITY OF LAF1524 SAN FERNANDO RD. BIK E PATH PH. IIIA/IIIB

– CONSTRUCTION. RECOMM END PHASE IIIA

CONSTR UCTION OF A CLASS I BIKE PATH WITHIN MET RO OWNED RAIL RIGHT

- OF

- WAY ALONG SAN FERNANDO RD. BETWEEN BRANFORD ST. AND TUX FORD ST INCL BRIDGE. 10/1/2015

LOS ANGELES, CITY OF LAF1615 EASTSIDE LIGHT RAIL PEDESTRIAN LINKAGE. IMPROVE LINKAGES WIT HIN 1/4 MILE OF METRO‟S GOLD LINE LRT. 6/29/2012

LOS ANGELES, CITY OF LAF1657 LOS ANGELES VALLEY C OLLEGE (LAVC) BUS ST ATION EXTENSION. PRO JECT WILL EXTEND THE ORANGE LINE STATION AT THE LA VALLEY COL LEGE BY PROVIDING A DIRECT PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION FROM THE STATION TO A N EW PEDESTRIAN ENTRAN CE TO LAVC. 10/1/2013

LOS ANGELES, CITY OF LAF1708 HOLLYWOOD INTEGRATED MODAL INFORMATION SY STEM. INSTALLATION O F ELECTRONIC, DIRECTION AND PARKIN G AVAILABILITY SIGNS WITH INTERNET CONNEC TIVITY TO PROVIDE ADVANCE AND REAL

- TIME INFORMAT ION INTENDED TO INCR EASE TRANSIT RIDERSH IP 9/21/2015

## Final 2012 AQMP Appendix IV

- C

Attachment A: Committed Transportation Control Measures (TCMs)

IV

- C

- 25 Los Angeles County

Lead Agency Project ID Project Description Completion Date

LOS ANGELES, CITY OF LAF3419 SUNSET JUNCTION PHAS E 2. CREATE A MULTI

- MODAL TRANSIT PLAZA TO INTEGRATE PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION, PEDE STRIAN & BICYCLE IMP ROVEMENTS THAT WOULD RESULT IN REGIONAL & LOCAL BENEFITS (CFP3844). TRIANGLE PROPERTY ON SUNSET BLVD BWT MANZ ANITA AND SANTA MONICA. 6/30/2017

MONROVIA LAE0039 TRANSIT VILLAGE

– PROVIDE A TRANS. FAC ILITY FOR SATELLITE PARKING FOR SIERRA M ADRE VILLA GOLD LINE STA, P

- N

- R FOR COMMUTERS, A F OOTHILL TRANSIT STORE. 12/31/2012

PORT OF LOS ANGELES LAF3170 PORT TRUCK TRAFFIC R EDUCTION PROGRAM: WE ST BASIN RAILYARD. I NTERMODAL RAILYARD CONNECTING PORT OF L A WITH ALAMEDA CORRI DOR TO ACCOMMODATE I NCREASED LOADING OF TRAINS AT THE POR T, THEREBY REDUCING TRUCK TRIPS TO OFF

- DOCK RAILYARDS. 12/1/2014

RANCHO PALOS VERDES LAF1506 BIKE COMPATIBLE RDWY SAFETY AND LINKAGE O N PALOS VERDES DR. T HE PROJECT WILL HAVE A CLASS II BIKE LANE ON BOTH SIDES OF PAL OS VERDES DRIVE SOUT H, WITH AN UNPAVED SHOULDER FOR EMERGEN CY USE. 10/9/2014

RANCHO PALOS VERDES LAF1605 PEDESTRIAN SAFE BUS STOP LINKAGE. LINKIN G 11 BUS STOPS CURRE NTLY INACCESSIBLE BECAUSE OF LACK OF S IDEWALKS ON BOTH THE EAST AND WEST SIDE O F HAWTHORNE BLVD. FROM CREST RD. TO PA LOS VERDES DR. SOUTH (ABOUT 13,000‟) 12/ 9/2013

SAN DIMAS LAF1503 BIKEWAY IMPROVEMENTS ON FOOTHILL BLVD. AT SAN DIMAS WASH. THE BWY IMPROVEMENTS ON FOOTHILL BLVD. AT SAN DIMAS WASH; WILL CLOSE THE GAP ON A B RIDGE & CONNECT THE EXISTING CLASS II BI KE LANES TO THE EAST & WEST OF SAN DIMAS WASH CRO SSING. 12/1/2013

SAN GABRIEL VALLEY C OG LA990359 GRADE SEP XINGS SAFE TY IMPR; 35

- MI FREIGHT RAIL CORR . THRGH SAN.GAB. VAL LEY

– EAST. L.A. TO POMONA ALONG UPRR ALHAMBRA &L.A. SUBDIV

– ITS 2318 SAFETEA #21 78;1436 #1934 PPNO 2318 6/30/2018

SANTA FE SPRINGS LA0F096 NORWALK SANTA FE SPR INGS TRANSPORTATION CENTER PARKING EXPAN SION AND BIKEWAY IMPROVEMENTS. PROVID E ADDITIONAL 250 PAR KING SPACES FOR TRAN SIT CENTER PATRONS AND IMPROVE BICYCLES ACCESS TO THE TRANSI T CENTER 6/30/2012

SANTA MONICA LAE0364 CONSTRUCT INTERMODAL PARK AND RIDE FACILITY AT SAN TA MONICA COLLEGE CA MPUS ON SOUTH BUNDY DRIVE NE AR AIRPORT AVENUE 12/31/2013

## Final 2012 AQMP Appendix IV

- C

Attachment A: Committed Transportation Control Measures (TCMs)

IV

- C

- 26 Los Angeles County

Lead Agency Project ID Project Description Completion Date

TORRANCE LA0G358 SOUTH BAY REGIONAL I NTERMODAL TRANSIT CE NTER PROJECT. THE LA ND IS IN THE PROCESS OF BEING PURCHASED AND ESCROW WILL CLOSE ON DECEMBER 17 , 2009. PRESENTLY, T HE LOT IS VACANT/OPEN LAND WIT H NO EXISTING STRUCT URE UPON IT. THE ADD RESS IS 465 N. CRENS HAW BLVD., TORRANCE, CA 90503. 12/31/2015

WESTLAKE VILLAGE LA960142 LINDERO CANYON ROAD FROM AGOURA TO JANLO R DR CONSTRUCT BI KE PATH, RESTRIPE STREET, INTERSECTION WIDENING, SIGNAL COO RDINATION 1/30/2013

Orange County

Lead Agency Project ID Project Description Completion Date

ANAHEIM ORA000100 GENE AUTRY WAY WEST @ I

- 5 (I

- 5 HOV TRANSITWAY TO HASTER) ADD OVERCROS SING ON I

- 5 (S)/MANCHESTER AND E XTEND GENE AUTRY WAY WEST FROM I

- 5 TO HASTER (3 LANES IN EA DIR.) 11/16/2012

CALTRANS ORA000193 HOV CONNECTORS FROM SR

- 22 TO I

- 405, BETWEEN SEAL BE ACH BLVD. (I

- 405 PM 022.558) AND VALLEY VIEW ST. (SR

- 22 PM R000.917), WIT H A SECOND HOV LANE IN EACH DIRECTI ON ON I

- 405 BETWEEN THE TWO DIRE CT CONNECTORS. 2/1/2015

CALTRANS ORA000194 HOV CONNECTORS FROM I

- 405 TO I

- 605, BETWEEN KATELLA AVE. (I

- 605 PM R001.104) AND SEAL BEACH BLVD. (I

- 405 PM 022.643), WIT H A SECOND HOV LANE IN EACH DIRECTION O N I

- 405 BETWEEN THE TWO DIRE CT CONNECTIONS. 7/1/2015

FULLERTON ORA020113 FULLERTON TRAIN STAT ION

– PARKING STRUCTURE, P HASE I AND II. TOTAL OF 800 SPACES (PPNO 2026) 5/31/2012

ORANGE COUNTY TRANS AUTHORITY

(OCTA) ORA041501 PURCHASE (71) STANDA RD 30FT EXPANSION BUSES

– ALTERNATIVE FUEL

– (31) IN FY08

- 09, (9) IN FY09

- 10, (7) IN FY11

- 12, (6) IN FY12

- 13 AND (18) IN FY13

- 14 6/30/2016

ORANGE COUNTY TRANS AUTHORITY

(OCTA) ORA110633 RIDESHARE VANPOOL PR OGRAM

– CAPITAL LEASE COSTS 9/30/2012

ORANGE COUNTY TRANS AUTHORITY

(OCTA) ORA65002 RIDESHARE SERVICES R IDEGUIDE, DATABASE, CUSTOMER INFO, AND M ARKETING (ORANGE COUNTY PORTION). 6/30/2016

## Final 2012 AQMP Appendix IV

- C

Attachment A: Committed Transportation Control Measures (TCMs)

IV

- C

- 27 Orange County

Lead Agency Project ID Project Description Completion Date

ORANGE COUNTY TRANS AUTHORITY

(OCTA) ORA0826016 PURCHASE (72) PARATR ANSIT EXPANSION VANS

– (21) IN FY09/10, (51 ) IN FY1 0/11. 6/30/2016

ORANGE COUNTY TRANS AUTHORITY

(OCTA) ORA082618 PURCHASE PARATRANSIT VEHICLES EXPANSION ( MISSION VIEJO) (11) IN FY09/10. ON

- GOING PROJECT. 6/30/2030

TCA 10254 SJHC, 15 MI TOLL RD BETWEEN I

- 5 IN SAN JUAN CAPIST RANO & RTE 73 IN IRV INE, EXISTING 3/M/F EA.DIR.1 ADD‟L M/F E A DIR, PLUS CLIMBING & AUX LNS AS REQ, BY 2020 PER SCAG/TCA MO U 4/5/01 12/31/2020

TCA ORA050 ETC (RTE 241/261/133 ) (RTE 91 TO I

- 5/JAMBOREE) EXISTING 2 M/F EA.DIR, 2 ADD‟ L M/F IN EA. DIR, PLUS CLIMB AND AUX L NS AS REQ, BY 2020 PER SCAG/TCA MO U 4/05/01. 12/31/2020

TCA ORA051 (FTC

- N) (OSO PKWY TO ETC) (13MI) EXISTING 2 MF IN EA. DIR, 2 ADDITI ONAL M/F LANES, PLS CLMBNG & AUX LANS AS REQ BY 2020 PER SCAG /TCA MOU 4/05/01. 12/31/2020

TCA ORA052 (FTC

- S) (I

- 5 TO OSO PKWY) (15MI ) 2 MF EA. DIR BY 2013 ; AND 1 ADDITIONAL M /F EA. DIR. PLS CLMBNG & AUX LANES A S REQ BY 2030 PER SC AG/TCA MOU 4/05/01. #1988 6/15/2030

Riverside County

Lead Agency Project ID Project Description Completion Date

RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRA NS COMMISSION

(RCTC) RIV010212 ON SR91

– ADAMS TO 60/215 IC: ADD ONE HOV LN IN EA CH DIRECTION, RESTRI PE TO EXTEND 4TH WB MIXED FLOW LANE F ROM 60/215 IC TO CEN TRAL OFF

- RAMP, RESTRIPE TO EX TEND 5TH WB MIXED FLOW LANE FROM 60/215 IC TO 14TH ST OFF

- RAMP, AUX LNS (MADIS ON

- CENTRAL), BRIDGE WIDENING & REPLACEME NTS, EB/WB BRAIDED R AMPS, IC MOD/RECONST RUCT + SOUND/RETAINING WALL S 8/3/2015

RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRA NS COMMISSION

(RCTC) RIV050555 ON I

- 215 (N/O EUCALYPTUS AVE TO N/O BOX SPRIN GS RD) & SR60 (E/O D AY ST TO SR60/I

- 215 JCT): RECONSTRUCT JCT TO P ROVIDE 2 HOV DIRECT CONNECTOR LNS (SR60 PM: 12.21 TO 13.6) A ND MINOR WIDENING TO BO X SPRINGS RD FROM 2 TO 4 THROUGH LANES B ETWEEN MORTON RD AND BOX SPRINGS RD/FAIR ISLE DR IC (EA: 4493 11) 4/29/2013

## Final 2012 AQMP Appendix IV

- C

Attachment A: Committed Transportation Control Measures (TCMs)

IV

- C

- 28 Riverside County

Lead Agency Project ID Project Description Completion Date

RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRA NS COMMISSION

(RC TC) RIV051201 IN CORONA

– CONTINUE THE IMPLEME NTATION OF A 60 SPAC E PARK

- AND

- RIDE LOT (VIA ANNUAL LEASE AGREEMENT) AT LIVING TRUTH CHRISTI AN FELLOWSHIP AT 111 4 W. ONTARIO AVE. 6/30/2013

RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRA NS COMMISSION

(RCTC) RIV070303 ON SR60 IN NW RIV CO: CONTINUE THE IMP LEMENTATION OF THE E XPANDED SR60 FREEWAY SERVICE PATROL (FSP) (BEAT #7 PATROL , 2 TRUCKS) BETWEEN MILI KEN AVE & MAIN ST (S R60 HOV LN CHANGE TCM SU BSTITUTION PROJECT) ON GOING TCM PROGRAM IN RIVERSIDE COUNTY

RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRA NS COMMI SSION

(RCTC) RIV070304 ON I

- 215 IN SW RIV CO: CO NTINUE THE IMPLEMENT ATION OF I

- 215 FREEWAY SERVICE PATROL (FSP) (BEAT #19, 2 T RUCKS) BETWEEN SR74/ 4TH ST AND ALESSANDR O BLVD (SR60 HOV LAN E CHANGE TCM SUBSTITUT ION PROJECT) ON

- GOING TCM PROGRAM IN RIVERSIDE C OUNTY

RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRA NS COMMISSION

(RCTC) RIV070307 ON SR60 IN MORENO VA LLEY: CONTINUE THE I MPLEMENTATION OF SR6 0 FREEWAY SERVICE PATROL (FSP) (BEAT # 8, 2 TRUCKS) BETWEEN DAY ST AND REDLANDS BLVD (SR60 HOV LANE CHANGE TCM SUBSTITUT ION PROJECT) ON

- GOI NG TCM PROGRAM IN RIVERSIDE COUNTY

RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRA NS COMMISSION

(RCTC) RIV520109 RECONSTRUCT & UPGRAD E SAN JACINTO BRANCH LINE FOR RAIL PASSEN GER SERVICE (RIVERSIDE TO PERRIS ) (PERRIS VALLEY LIN E) (FY 07 5307) (UZA : RIV

- SAN) 2014

RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANS COMMISSION

(RCTC) RIV520111 REGIONAL RIDESHARE

– CONTINUING PROGRAM. ON

- GOING TCM PROGRAM IN RIVERSIDE COUNTY

RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AG ENCY RIV041030 IN THE CITY OF HEMET

– CONSTRUCT NEW HEMET TRANSIT CENTER (WITH APPROXIMATELY 4 BUS BAYS) AT 700 SCA RAME LLA CR., HEMET, CA ( 5309C FY 04 + 05 EAR MARKS). 6/30/2013

RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AG ENCY RIV050553 IN TEMECULA

– CONSTRUCT NEW TEMECU LA TRANSIT CENTER AT 27199 JEFFERSON AVE. (SW OF JEFFERSON AVE & SE O F CHERRY ST) (04, 05 , 06, 07, E

- 2006

- 091, E

- 2007

- 0131, & 2008

- BUSP

- 0131, SAFETEA

- LU). 12/30/2014

RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AG ENCY RIV090609 IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY FOR RTA: INST ALL ADVANCE TRAVELER INFORMATION SYSTEMS (ATIS) ON VA RIOUS FIXED ROUTE VE HICLES AND INSTALLAT ION OF ELECTRONIC MESSAGE SIGNS AT APP ROX. 60 BUS STOPS (FY „S 05, 07, 08, 09, AND 10

– 5309). 12/30/2012

## Final 2012 AQMP Appendix IV

- C

Attachment A: Committed Transportation Control Measures (TCMs)

IV

- C

- 29 Riverside County

Lead Agency Project ID Project Description Completion Date

TEMECULA RIV62029 AT HWY 79 SO AND LA PAZ ST: ACQUIRE LAND , DESIGN AND CONSTRU CT PARK

- AND

- RIDE LOT

– 250 SPACES (FY 05 HR 4818 EARMARK) 12/31/2015

San Bernardino County

Lead Agency Project ID Project Description Completion Date

OMNITRANS 981118 BUS SYSTEM

– PASSENGER FACILITIES : DESIGN AND BUILDIN G OF ONTARIO TRANSCE NTER 5/31/2012

RIALTO 200450 RIALTO METROLINK STA TION

– INCREASE PARKING SPA CES FROM 225

- 775 12/1/2012

SANBAG 200074 LUMP SUM

– TRANSPORTATION ENHAN CEMENT ACTIVITIES PR OJECTS FOR SAN BERNA RDINO COUNTY

- BIKE/PED PROJECTS (P ROJECTS CONSISTENT W /40CFR PART 93.126,1 27,128, EXEMPT TABLE 2 & 3). 12/1/2015

SANBAG 20040827 RIDESHARE PROGRAM FO R SOUTHCOAST AIR DIS TRIST 12/1/2015

VARIOUS AGENCIES 713 I

- 215 CORRIDOR NORTH

– IN SAN BERNARDINO, O N I

- 215 FROM RTE 10 TO R TE 210

– ADD 2 HOV & 2 MIXED FLOW LNS (1 IN EA. DIR.) AND OPERAT IONAL IMP INCLUDING AUX LANES AND BRAIDE D RAMP 9/1/2013



### Note: Projects may include TCM and non

- TCM portions. Committed TCM s include only that portion of the project s that meets the definition of TCM s.

## Final 2012 AQMP Appendix IV

- C

Attachment B: 2012 South Coast PM2.5 AQMP Reasonably Available Control Measure (RACM) Analysis

- TCMs

IV

- C

- 30 Section 108 (f) 1. Programs for Improved Public Transit

Measure # Measure Title Description Has It Been Implemented Reasoned Justification for Not

Implementing Measure Implementing Agency or Agencies

1.1 Regional Express Bus Program Purchase of buses to operate regional express bus services. Yes CTCs (MTA, OCTA), Transit Operators

1.2 Transit access to airports Operation of transit to airport to serve air passengers. Yes Transit Operators, CTCs (MTA, SCRRA)

1.3 Accelerate Bus Retrofit Program Accelerate application of retrofit of diesel

- powered buses to achieve earlier compliance with state regulations. Yes CTCs (MTA, OCTA), Transit Operators

1.4 Mass transit alternatives Major change to the scope and service levels. Yes SCAG, CTCs

1.5 Expansion of public transportation

systems Expand and enhance existing public transit services. Yes CTCs

1.6 Transit service improvements in

combination with park

- and

- ride lots and parking Management Local jurisdictions and transit agency improve the public transit system and add new park

- and

- ride facilities and spaces on an as needed basis. Yes CTCs (MTA, SCRRA)

## Final 2012 AQMP Appendix IV

- C

Attachment B: 2012 South Coast PM2.5 AQMP Reasonably Available Control Measure (RACM) Analysis

- TCMs

IV

- C

- 31 Section 108 (f) 1. Programs for Improved Public Transit

Measure # Measure Title Description Has It Been Implemented Reasoned Justification for Not

Implementing Measure Implementing Agency or Agencies

1.7 Free transit during special events Require free transit during selected special events to reduce event

- related congestion and associated emission increases. No (The Mobile Source Air Pollution Reduction Review Committee has been co

- funding free event center shuttle service demonstration projects) The Legislature significantly

reduced authority of AQMD to implement indirect source control measures through revisions to the Health & Safety Code (HSC 40717.8).

Transit agencies should decide individually whether this measure is economically feasible for them.

1.8 Require that government employees use

transit for home to work trips, expand transit, and encourage large businesses to promote transit use Require all government employees use transit a specified number of times per week , or expand transit, and encourage business to promote tra nsit use

. Yes CTCs

1.9 Increase parking at transit centers or

stops Encourage transit convenience by providing additional parking at transit centers. Yes CTCs

1.10 Expand regional transit connection ticket

distribution Provides interchangeability of transit ticket. Yes CTCs, Metrolink

## Final 2012 AQMP Appendix IV

- C

Attachment B: 2012 South Coast PM2.5 AQMP Reasonably Available Control Measure (RACM) Analysis

- TCMs

IV

- C

- 32 Section 108 (f) 2. Restriction of Certain Roads or Lanes to, or Construction of Such Roads or Lanes for Use By, Passenger Bus es or High Occupancy Vehicles

Measure # Measure Title Description Has It Been Implemented Reasoned Justification for Not

Implementing Measure Implementing Agency or Agencies

2.1 Update High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV)

Lane Master Plan Analysis of increased enforcement, increasing occupancy requirements, conversion of existing HOV lanes to bus only lanes and/or designation of any new carpool lanes as bus

- only lanes; utilization of freeway shoulders for peak

- period express bus use; commercial vehicle buy

- in to HOV lanes; and appropriateness of HOV lanes for corridors that have considered congestion pricing or value pricing. Yes SCAG, Caltrans, CTCs

2.2 Fixed lanes for buses and carpools on

arterials Provide fixed lanes for buses and carpools on arterial streets where appropriate. Yes CTCs (MTA, OCTA), LA City

2.3 Expand number of freeway miles

available, allow use by alternative fuel vehicles, changes to HOV lane requirements and hours Various measures evaluated in many ozone nonattainment areas. Specifics vary according to freeway system, use patterns and local characteristics

. Yes ARB, Caltrans

## Final 2012 AQMP Appendix IV

- C

Attachment B: 2012 South Coast PM2.5 AQMP Reasonably Available Control Measure (RACM) Analysis

- TCMs

IV

- C

- 33 Section 108 (f) 3. Employer

- Based Transportation Management Plans, Including Incentives

Measure # Measure Title Description Has It Been Implemented Reasoned Justification for Not

Implementing Measure Implementing Agency or Agencies

3.1  Commute solutions The federal law that complements parking cash

- out is called the Commuter Choice Program . It provides for benefits that employers can offer to employees to commute to work by methods other than driving alone. Yes Employer

, AQMD

3.2* Parking cash

- out State law requires certain employers who provide subsidized parking for their employees to offer a cash allowance in lieu of a parking space. Yes Employer, AQMD

3.3* Employer Rideshare Program Incentives Employer rideshare incentives and introduction of strategies designed to reduce single occupant vehicle trips. Examples include: public awareness campaigns, Transportation Management Associations among employers, alternative work hours, and financial incentives. Yes Employer, AQMD

3.4* Implement Parking Charge Incentive

Program Evaluate feasibility of an incentive program for cities and employers that convert free public parking spaces to paid spaces. Review existing parking polices as they relate to new development approvals. Yes Cities, Counties, Employer

3.5* Preferential parking for carpools and

vanpools This measure encourages public and private employers to provide preferential parking spaces for carpools and vanpools to decrease the number of single occupant automobile work trips. The preferential treatmen t could include covered parking spaces or close

- in
spaces. Yes Employer

, AQMD

 This measure relates to AQMD Rule 2202, On

- Road Motor Vehicle Mitigation Options. Administered by AQMD, Rule 2202 provides a menu of options for employers in choosing how they will comply. Individual employe rs implement the mitigation option(s) that they have chosen.

## Final 2012 AQMP Appendix IV

- C

Attachment B: 2012 South Coast PM2.5 AQMP Reasonably Available Control Measure (RACM) Analysis

- TCMs

IV

- C

- 34 Section 108 (f) 3. Employer

- Based Transportation Management Plans, Including Incentives

Measure # Measure Title Description Has It Been Implemented Reasoned Justification for Not

Implementing Measure Implementing Agency or Agencies

3.6* Employee parking fees Encourage public and private employers to charge employees for parking. Yes Employer

, AQMD

3.7 Merchant transportation incentives Implement “non

- work” trip reduction ordinances requiring merchants to offer customers mode shift travel incentives such as free bus passes and requiring owners/managers/developers of large retail establishments to provide facilities for non

- motorized modes. No Requi re state legislation.

3.8* Purchase vans for vanpools Purchase a specified number of vans for use in employee commute travel. Yes Employer, AQMD

3.9* Encourage merchants and employers to

subsidize the cost of transit for employees Provide outreach and possible financial incentives to encourage local employers to provide transit passes or subsidies to encourage less individual vehicle travel. Yes Employer, AQMD

3.10  Compressed work weeks Work 80 hours in 9 days, or 40 hours in 4 days , or 36 hours in 3 days in lieu of working 40 hours in 5 days

. Yes Employer, AQMD

3.11* Telecommuting Goal of specified percentage of employees telecommuting at least once per week. Yes Employer, AQMD

3.12 Income Tax Credit to Telecommuters Provide tax relief to employees telecommuting to work. No Requires state legislation.

 This measure relates to AQMD Rule 2202, On

- Road Motor Vehicle Mitigation Options. Administered by AQMD, Rule 2202 provides a menu of options for employers in choosing how they will com

ply. Individual employe rs implement the mitigation option(s) that they have chosen

.

## Final 2012 AQMP Appendix IV

- C

Attachment B: 2012 South Coast PM2.5 AQMP Reasonably Available Control Measure (RACM) Analysis

- TCMs

IV

- C

- 35 Section 108 (f) 4. Trip Reduction Ordinance

In December 1995, Congress changed the Clean Air Act Amendments to make the Employee Commute Option program voluntary (no lon ger mandatory). California State Law prohibits mandatory employer based trip reduction ordinance programs (SB437). (HSC 40717.9) T o account for these restrictions, SCAQMD Rule 2202 provides employers with a menu of options to reduce mobile source emissions generated from employee commutes. Rule 2202 complies with federal and state Clean Air Act req uirements, HSC 40458, and HSC 182(d )(1)(B) of the federal Clean Air Act. Nevertheless, some jurisdictions continue to implement Trip Reduction Ordinances. For example, the City of S anta Monica requires new and existing non

- residential development projects to adopt Emission Reduction Plans and pay transportation impact fees to reduce traffic congestion and improve air quality in the city.

Section 108 (f) 5. Traffic Flow Improvement Programs That Achieve Emissions Reductions

Measure # Measure Title Description Has It Been Implemented Reasoned Justification for Not

Implementing Measure Implementing Agency or Agencies

5.1 Develop Intelligent Transportation

Systems The term “Intelligent Transportation Systems” includes a variety of technological applications intended to produce more efficient use of existing transportation corridors. Yes CTCs, Caltrans

5.2 Coordinate traffic signal systems This measures implements and enhances synchronized traffic signal systems to promote steady traffic flow at moderate speeds. Yes CTCs, Counties, and C ities

5.3 Reduce traffic congestion at major

intersections This measure implements a wide range of traffic control techniques designed to facilitate smooth, safe travel through intersections. These techniques include signalization, turn lanes or median dividers. The use of grade separations may also be appropriate for high volume or unusually configur ed intersections. Yes CTCs, Counties, and Cities

5.4 Site

- specific transportation control

measures This measure could include geometric or traffic control improvements at specific congested intersections or at other substandard locations. Another example might be programming left turn signals at certain intersections to lag, rather than lead, the green time for through traffic. Yes CTCs, Counties, and Cities

## Final 2012 AQMP Appendix IV

- C

Attachment B: 2012 South Coast PM2.5 AQMP Reasonably Available Control Measure (RACM) Analysis

- TCMs

IV

- C

- 36 Section 108 (f) 5. Traffic Flow Improvement Programs That Achieve Emissions Reductions

Measure # Measure Title Description Has It Been Implemented Reasoned Justification for Not

Implementing Measure Implementing Agency or Agencies

5.5 Removal of on

- street parking Require all commercial/industrial development to design and implement off

- street parking. Yes CTCs, Counties, and Cities

5.6 Reversible lanes Implement reversible lanes on arterial streets to improve traffic flow where appropriate. Yes CTCs, Counties, and Cities

5.7 One

- way streets Redesignate streets (or portions of in downtown areas)

as one

- way to improve traffic flow. Yes CTCs, Counties, and Cities

5.8 On

- Street parking restrictions Restrict on

- street parking where appropriate. Yes CTCs, Counties, and Cities

5.9 Bus pullouts in curbs for passenger

loading Provide bus pullouts in curbs, or queue jumper lanes for passenger loading and unloading. Yes CTCs, Counties, and Cities

5.10 Additional freeway service patrol Operation of additional lane miles of new roving tow truck patrols to clear incidents and reduce delay on freeways during peak periods. Yes CTCs, CHP

5.11 Fewer stop signs, remove unwarranted

and "political" stop signs and signals Improve flow

- through traffic by removing stop signs and signals. Potential downside in safety issues. Yes CTCs, Counties, and Cities

5.12 Ban left turns Banning all left turns would stop the creation of bottlenecks although slightly increase travel distances. No No clear demonstration of air quality emissions benefits.

5.13 Changeable lane assignments Increase number of one

- way lanes going in congested flow direction during peak traffic hours. Yes Caltrans, CTCs, Counties, and Cities

5.14 Adaptive traffic signals and signal timing Self explanatory. Yes Counties, Counties, and Cites

## Final 2012 AQMP Appendix IV

- C

Attachment B: 2012 South Coast PM2.5 AQMP Reasonably Available Control Measure (RACM) Analysis

- TCMs

IV

- C

- 37 Section 108 (f) 5. Traffic Flow Improvement Programs That Achieve Emissions Reductions

Measure # Measure Title Description Has It Been Implemented Reasoned Justification for Not

Implementing Measure Implementing Agency or Agencies

5.15 Freeway bottleneck improvements (add

lanes, construct shoulders, etc.) Identify key freeway bottlenecks and take accelerated action to mitigate them. Yes Caltrans , SCAG

5.16 Minimize impact of construction on

traveling public. Have contractors pay when lanes are closed as an incentive to keep lanes open. Prohibit lane closures during peak hours, limit work to weekends and/or nights. Yes Caltrans

5.17 Internet provided road and route

information Reduce travel on highly congested roadways by providing accessible information on congestion and travel. Yes CTCs, Caltrans, Counties, Cities

5.18 Regional route marking systems to

encourage underutilized capacity Encourage travel on local roads and arterials by better route marking to show alternatives. Yes Caltrans, Counties, Cities

5.19 Congestion management field team to

clear incidents Self explanatory. Yes CTCs, CHP

5.20 Use dynamic message signs to

direct/smooth speeds during incidents Self explanatory. Yes Caltrans

5.21 Get real

- time traffic information to

trucking centers and rental car agencies Reduce travel in congested areas by providing information directly to high volume travelers. Yes CTCs, Caltrans

## Final 2012 AQMP Appendix IV

- C

Attachment B: 2012 South Coast PM2.5 AQMP Reasonably Available Control Measure (RACM) Analysis

- TCMs

IV

- C

- 38 Section 108 (f) 5. Traffic Flow Improvement Programs That Achieve Emissions Reductions

Measure # Measure Title Description Has It Been Implemented Reasoned Justification for Not

Implementing Measure Implementing Agency or Agencies

5.22 55 mph speed limit during ozone season Self explanatory No Reductions in freeway speeds are governed by California Vehicle Code 22354, which authorizes Caltrans to lower speeds after doing an engineering and traffic survey, which shows that the legislatively

- set maximum speed of 65 mph, is more than is reasonabl e or safe.

No consideration of emissions is contemplated under this statute. This measure is not feasible until the statute is changed.

5.23 Require 40 mph speed limit on all

facilities Depends on area‟s emission factors. No The California Vehicle Code Sections 22357 and 22358 mandates a methodology for setting speed limits for local areas. This measure is not feasible until the statute is changed.

5.24 Require lower speeds during peak

periods Self explanatory. No The California Vehicle Code Sections 22357 and 22358 mandates methodology for setting speed limits for local areas. This measure is not feasible until the statute is changed.

5.25 On

- street parking restrictions Restrict on

- street parking where appropriate. Yes State, Counties, and Cities

## Final 2012 AQMP Appendix IV

- C

Attachment B: 2012 South Coast PM2.5 AQMP Reasonably Available Control Measure (RACM) Analysis

- TCMs

IV

- C

- 39 Section 108 (f) 6. Fringe and Transportation Corridor Parking Facilities Serving Multiple Occupancy Vehicle Programs or Trans it Service

Measure # Measure Title Description Has It Been Implemented Reasoned Justification for Not

Implementing Measure Implementing Agency or Agencies

6.1 Park

- and

- ride lots Develop, design, and implement new park

- and

- ride facilities in locations where they are needed. Yes CTCs, Transit Operators, SCRRA

6.2 Park

- and

- ride lots serving perimeter

counties Specific to a locality. Yes CTCs, Transit Operators, SCRRA

Section 108 (f) 7. Programs to Limit or Restrict Vehicle Use in Downtown Areas or Other Areas of Emission Concentration Parti cularly During Periods of Peak Use

Measure # Measure Title Description Has It Been Implemented Reasoned Justification for Not

Implementing Measure Implementing Agency or Agencies

7.1 Off

- peak goods movement Restrict truck deliveries by time or place in order to minimize traffic congestion during peak periods. Yes PierPass

A non

- profit organization of marine terminal operators at the Ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach.

7.2 Truck restrictions during peak periods Restrict truck travel during peak periods in order to minimize traffic congestion. Yes See Measure 7.1

7.3 Involve school districts to encourage

walking/bicycling to school Decrease vehicle emissions due to school trips by reducing these trips through education and out

- reach
programs. Yes School Districts

## Final 2012 AQMP Appendix IV

- C

Attachment B: 2012 South Coast PM2.5 AQMP Reasonably Available Control Measure (RACM) Analysis

- TCMs

IV

- C

- 40 Section 108 (f) 7. Programs to Limit or Restrict Vehicle Use in Downtown Areas or Other Areas of Emission Concentration Parti cularly During Periods of Peak Use

Measure # Measure Title Description Has It Been Implemented Reasoned Justification for Not

Implementing Measure Implementing Agency or Agencies

7.4 Adjust school hours so they do not

coincide with peak traffic periods and

ozone seasons Measure to reduce travel during peak periods and

ozone

- contributing periods in the early morning. No School hours are dictated by many variables, including overcrowding and year

- round schooling. This measure is not feasible.

7.5 Area

- wide tax for parking Reduce driving by limiting parking through pricing

measures. Yes Counties

, Cities

7.6 Increase parking fees Reduce driving by limiting parking through pricing

measures. No Attorney General ruled AQMD lacks authority to implement this

measure

.

7.7 Graduated pricing starting with highest in

Central Business District Charge the most for parking in the central business or other high volume areas in a city to discourage vehicle travel in these areas. Yes Market Driven

7.8 Buy parking lots and convert to other

land use Limit parking by converting available parking to other land uses to discourage driving. Yes Counties and Cities

7.9 Limit the number of parking spaces at

commercial airlines to support mass transit Reduce airport travel by limits on parking at airports. No Regulatory agencies do not have the legal authority to make local land use decisions. It is at the discretion of the regional or local airport authority to make local land use decisions pertaining to airports.

Additionally, It is necessary to have signi ficant mass transit available at airports before this measure can be implemented.

## Final 2012 AQMP Appendix IV

- C

Attachment B: 2012 South Coast PM2.5 AQMP Reasonably Available Control Measure (RACM) Analysis

- TCMs

IV

- C

- 41 Section 108 (f) 7. Programs to Limit or Restrict Vehicle Use in Downtown Areas or Other Areas of Emission Concentration Parti cularly During Periods of Peak Use

Measure # Measure Title Description Has It Been Implemented Reasoned Justification for Not

Implementing Measure Implementing Agency or Agencies

7.10 No Central Business District (CBD)

vehicles unless LEV or alt fuel or electric Define high

- use area and ticket any vehicles present unless they are low emitting, alternative fueled or electric. No The Legislature significantly reduced authority to implement indirect source control measures through revisions to the Health & Safety Code (40717.6, 40717.8, and 40717.9).

7.11 Auto restricted zones No vehicles allowed in certain areas where high emissions, congestion or contribution to ozone problems. Yes Counties and Cities

7.12 Incentives to increase density around

transit centers Lower travel by increasing residential and commercial density in areas near transit. Yes Counties and Cities

7.13 Land use/air quality guidelines Guidelines for development that contributes to air quality goals. Yes ARB, AQMD,SCAG

7.14 Cash incentives to foster jobs/housing

balance Specific to locality

– encouraged by California Clean Air Plan. No No dedicated source of funding for this measure.

7.15 Trip reduction oriented development Land use decisions that encourage trip reductions. Yes Counties, Cities, CTCs

7.16 Transit oriented development Land use decisions that encourage walkable communities and multi

- modal transit systems. Yes Counties, Cities, CTCs

7.17 Sustainable development Land use decisions that create equitable standards of living to satisfy the basic needs of all peoples, all while taking the steps to avoid further environmental degradation. Yes Counties, Cities, CTCs

## Final 2012 AQMP Appendix IV

- C

Attachment B: 2012 South Coast PM2.5 AQMP Reasonably Available Control Measure (RACM) Analysis

- TCMs

IV

- C

- 42 Section 108 (f) 8. Programs For the Provision of All Forms of High

- Occupancy, Shared

- Ride Services

Measure # Measure Title Description Has It Been Implemented Reasoned Justification for Not

Implementing Measure Implementing Agency or Agencies

8.1  Financial Incentives, Including Zero

- Bus

Fares Provide financial incentives or other benefits, such as free or subsidized bus passes and cash payments for not driving, in lieu of parking spaces for employees who do not drive to the workplace. Yes AQMD, Employer

8.2 Internet ride matching services Provide match

- lists, route info, hours and contact information over the internet to assist individuals in joining or developing carpools. Yes CTCs, SCAG

8.3* Preferential parking for carpoolers Provide free, covered, near

- building or similar incentives to carpoolers. Yes AQMD, Employer

8.4* Credits and incentives for carpoolers Self

- explanatory

– form depends on locality. Yes AQMD, Employer

8.5* Employers provide vehicles to carpoolers

for running errands or emergencies Having vehicles available for workday errands makes it easier to go to work without one. Yes AQMD, Employer

8.6 Subscription services Free van services to provide transportation for the elderly, handicapped or other individuals who have no access to transportation. Yes County, Employer

8.7 School car pools Self explanatory and voluntary No Not economically feasible and insufficient resources available for implementation.

8.8* Guaranteed ride home Self explanatory. Yes AQMD, Employer

 This measure relates to AQMD Rule 2202, On

- Road Motor Vehicle Mitigation Options. Administered by AQMD, Rule 2202 provides a menu of options for employers in choosing h ow they will comply. Individual employe rs implement the mitigation option(s) that they have chosen

.

## Final 2012 AQMP Appendix IV

- C

Attachment B: 2012 South Coast PM2.5 AQMP Reasonably Available Control Measure (RACM) Analysis

- TCMs

IV

- C

- 43 Section 108 (f) 8. Programs For the Provision of All Forms of High

- Occupancy, Shared

- Ride Services

Measure # Measure Title Description Has It Been Implemented Reasoned Justification for Not

Implementing Measure Implementing Agency or Agencies

8.9 Transit Voucher Program Transit vouchers for elderly and low income commuters. Yes CTCs, SCAG

Section 108 (f) 9. Programs to Limit Portions of Road Surfaces or Certain Sections of the Metropolitan Area to the Use of Non

- Motorized Vehicles or Pedestrian Use, Both as to Time and Place

Measure # Measure Title Description Has It Been Implemented Reasoned Justification for Not

Implementing Measure Implementing Agency or Agencies

9.1 Establish Auto

- Free Zones and

pedestrian malls Establish auto free zones and pedestrian malls where appropriate. Yes Counties and Cities

9.2 Encouragement of pedestrian travel This measure involves encouraging the use of pedestrian travel as an alternative to automobile travel. Pedestrian travel is quite feasible for short shoppi ng, business, or school trips

. Yes CTCs, Counties, Cities , SCAG

9.3 Bicycle/Pedestrian Program Fund high priority projects in countywide plans consistent with funding availability. Yes CTCs, Counties, and Cities

9.4 Close certain roads for use by non

motorized traffic During special events, weekends, or certain times of the day, close some roads to all but non

- motorized traffic. Yes Counties, and Cities

## Final 2012 AQMP Appendix IV

- C

Attachment B: 2012 South Coast PM2.5 AQMP Reasonably Available Control Measure (RACM) Analysis

- TCMs

IV

- C

- 44 Section 108 (f) 9. Programs to Limit Portions of Road Surfaces or Certain Sections of the Metropolitan Area to the Use of Non

- Motorized Vehicles or Pedestrian Use, Both as to Time and Place

Measure # Measure Title Description Has It Been Implemented Reasoned Justification for Not

Implementing Measure Implementing Agency or Agencies

9.5 Encouragement of bicycle travel Promotion of bicycle travel to reduce automobile use and improve air quality. Bikeway system planning, routes for inter

- city bike trips to help bicyclists avoid other, less safe facilities. Another area for potential actions is the development and distribution of educational materials, regarding bicycle use and safety. Ye s SCAG, CTCs, Counties, and Cities

9.6 Free bikes Provide free bikes in the manner of Boulder, CO. Simple utilitarian bikes that can be used throughout the metro area and dropped off at destination for use by anyone desiring use. No Evidence suggests that bicycle theft is a problem in other programs and renders the measure technically and economically infeasible.

9.7  Cash rebates for bikes Provide financial incentives to purchase bicycles and thereby encourage use. Yes Employer

9.8 Close streets for special events for use by

bikes and pedestrians Self Explanatory. Yes Counties and Cities

9.9 Use condemned dirt roads for bike trails Self Explanatory. No Not applicable because there are no condemned dirt roads in the region.

 This measure relates to AQMD Rule 2202, On

- Road Motor Vehicle Mitigation Options. Administered by AQMD, Rule 2202 provides a menu of options for employe rs in choosing how they will comply. Individual employe rs implement the mitigation option(s) that they have chosen

.

## Final 2012 AQMP Appendix IV

- C

Attachment B: 2012 South Coast PM2.5 AQMP Reasonably Available Control Measure (RACM) Analysis

- TCMs

IV

- C

- 45 Section 108 (f) 10. Programs for Secure Bicycle Storage Facilities and Other Facilities, Including Bicycle Lanes, for the Convenience and Protection of Bicyclists, in Both Public and Private Areas

Measure # Measure Title Description Has It Been Implemented Reasoned Justification for Not

Implementing Measure Implementing Agency or Agencies

10.1  Bike racks at work sites Self Explanatory. Yes AQMD, Employer

10.2 Bike racks on buses Bike racks would be placed on a to

- be

- determined number of buses to increase bicycle travel. Yes CTCs, Transit Operators, SCRRA

10.3 Regional bike parking Bike Transit Centers Yes CTCs

10.4 Development of bicycle travel facilities Encourages a variety of capital improvements to increase bicycle use. Off

- street bikeways where high

speed roadways preclude safe bicycling. Clearly mark travel facilities with signs and provide adequate maintenance. Yes CTCs, Transit Operators, SCRRA

10.5 Expedite bicycle projects from RTP Create bicycle and pedestrian master plan and build out at an accelerated rate to achieve benefits in time for attainment deadline. Yes SCAG , CTCs, Counties, Cities

10.6 Provide bike/pedestrian facilities safety

patrols Self Explanatory. Yes Counties and Cities

10.7 Inclusion of bicycle lanes on

thoroughfare projects Self Explanatory. Yes State, Counties, and Cities

10.8 Bicycle lanes on arterial and frontage

roads Self Explanatory. Yes State, Counties, and Cities

10.9 Bicycle route lighting Self Explanatory. Yes State, Counties, Cities

 This measure relates to AQMD Rule 2202, On

- Road Motor Vehicle Mitigation Options. Administered by AQMD, Rule 2202 provides a menu of opt ions for employers in choosing how they will comply. Individual employe rs implement the mitigation option(s) that they have chosen

.

## Final 2012 AQMP Appendix IV

- C

Attachment B: 2012 South Coast PM2.5 AQMP Reasonably Available Control Measure (RACM) Analysis

- TCMs

IV

- C

- 46 Section 108 (f) 11. Programs to Control Extended Idling of Vehicles

Measure # Measure Title Description Has It Been Implemented Reasoned Justification for Not

Implementing Measure Implementing Agency or Agencies

11.1 Limit excessive car dealership vehicle

starts Require car dealers to limit the starting of vehicles for sale on their lot(s) to once every two weeks. Presently, a number of new and used car dealers start their vehicles daily to avoid battery failure and assure smooth start

- ups for cust omer test drives. No This measure was investigated by the AQMD and it was determined that in contrast to colder climates where vehicles are started on a daily basis, vehicles in the South Coast started much less frequently. For this reason it was determine d not to be technically feasible.

11.2 Encourage limitations on vehicle idling Encourage limitations to limit extended idling operations. Yes ARB

11.3 Turn off engines while stalled in traffic Public outreach or police

- enforced program. No This measure raises safety and congestion concerns.

No clear demonstration of air quality emissions benefits.

11.4 Outlaw idling in parking lots Self

- explanatory and p olice enforced program. No Enforcement of idle restrictions is a low priority for police relative to their other missions. The cost effectiveness of this measure has not been demonstrated. It is not economically feasible.

11.5 Reduce idling at drive

- throughs; ban

drive

- throughs Mandate no idling or do not allow drive

- through windows during ozone season. No No clear demonstration of air quality emissions benefits.

This measure is not economically feasible.

## Final 2012 AQMP Appendix IV

- C

Attachment B: 2012 South Coast PM2.5 AQMP Reasonably Available Control Measure (RACM) Analysis

- TCMs

IV

- C

- 47 Section 108 (f) 11. Programs to Control Extended Idling of Vehicles

Measure # Measure Title Description Has It Been Implemented Reasoned Justification for Not

Implementing Measure Implementing Agency or Agencies

11.6 Promote use of pony engines Use special battery engines to keep air conditioning and other truck systems working while truck not in use. Yes ARB

11.7 Idle restrictions at airport curbsides Self

- explanatory and p olice enforced. Yes Airport authority

11.8 Truck Stop Electrification Provide electric charging stations for at truck stops to power heating/AC units and other on - board equipment. Yes ARB

Section 108 (f) 12. Program to Reduce Motor Vehicle Emissions Consistent with Title II, Which Are Caused by Extreme Cold Star t Conditions

Not applicable. The definition of an "extreme cold start" specifies temperatures below 20 degrees Fahrenheit. Not applicable in the South Coast

- No extreme cold start conditions

## Final 2012 AQMP Appendix IV

- C

Attachment B: 2012 South Coast PM2.5 AQMP Reasonably Available Control Measure (RACM) Analysis

- TCMs

IV

- C

- 48 Section 108 (f) 13. Employer

- sponsored programs to permit flexible work schedules

Measure # Measure Title Description Has It Been Implemented Reasoned Justification for Not

Implementing Measure Implementing Agency or Agencies

13.1  Alternative work schedules Enables workers to choose their own working hours within certain constraints. Flextime provides the opportunity for employee s to use public transit, ridesharing, and other Nonmotorized transportation. A related strategy, staggered work hours, is designed to reduce congestion in the vicinity of the workplace. Alternative workweeks have been implemented extensively by large pri vate and public employers. Yes AQMD, Employer

13.2* Modifications of work schedules Implement alternate work schedules that flex the scheduled shift time for employees. Encourage the use of flexible or staggered work hours to promote off

peak driving and accommodate the use of transit and carpooling. Yes AQMD, Employer

13.3* Telecommunications

Telecommuting/Teleconferencing Encourage the use of telecommuting

telecommuting/teleconferencing in place of motor vehicle use where appropriate. Yes AQMD, Employer

 This measure relates to AQMD Rule 2202, On

- Road Motor Vehicle Mitigation Options. Administered by AQMD, Rule 2202 provid es a menu of options for employers in choosing how they will comply. Individual employe rs implement the mitigation option(s) that they have chosen

.

## Final 2012 AQMP Appendix IV

- C

Attachment B: 2012 South Coast PM2.5 AQMP Reasonably Available Control Measure (RACM) Analysis

- TCMs

IV

- C

- 49 Section 108 (f) 14. Programs and Ordinances to facilitate Non

- automotive travel, provision to and utilization of mass transit, and to generally reduce the need for single

- occupant vehicle travel, as part of transportation planning and development efforts

Measure # Measure Title Description Has It Been Implemented Reasoned Justification for Not

Implementing Measure Implementing Agency or Agencies

14.1 Areawide public awareness

programs This measure focuses on conducting ongoing public awareness
programs throughout the year to provide the public with information on air pollution and encourage changes in driving behavior and transportation mode use. Yes AQMD

14.2 Special event controls This measure would require new and existing owners/operators of the special event centers to reduce mobile source emissions generated by their events. A list of optional strategies would be available that reduce mobile source emissions. The definition of “special event center” could be developed through the rule developm ent process. Yes Counties, Cities, Special Event Operators

14.3 Land Use/development

alternatives This measure includes encouraging land use patterns, which support public transit and other alternative modes of transportation. In general, this measure would also encourage land use patterns designed to reduce travel distances between related land uses Yes ARB, SCAG, AQMD, Counties, Cities

14.4 Voluntary No

- Drive Day

programs Conduct voluntary No

- Drive Day programs during the ozone season through media and employer based public awareness activities. Yes CTCs

14.5   New Development Air Quality

Impact Evaluation Evaluate air quality impacts of new development and recommend or require mitigation for significant adverse impacts. Yes AQMD, Counties, Cities , CEQA Lead Agencies

  AQMD and SCAG recommend mitigation as commenting agencies on new development projects; cities and counti es require mitigation under their discretionary authority as lead agency.

## Final 2012 AQMP Appendix IV

- C

Attachment B: 2012 South Coast PM2.5 AQMP Reasonably Available Control Measure (RACM) Analysis

- TCMs

IV

- C

- 50 Section 108 (f) 14. Programs and Ordinances to facilitate Non

- automotive travel, provision to and utilization of mass transit, and to generally reduce the need for single

- occupant vehicle travel, as part of transportation planning and development efforts

Measure # Measure Title Description Has It Been Implemented Reasoned Justification for Not

Implementing Measure Implementing Agency or Agencies

14.6 Transportation for Livable

Communities (TLC)/Housing Incentive program Program provides planning grants, technical assistance, and capital grants to help cities and Nonprofit agencies define and implement transportation projects that support community plans including increased housing near transit. Yes SCAG , State

14.7 Incentives to increase density

around transit centers Lower travel by increasing residential and commercial density in areas near transit. Yes Counties, Cities, CTCs

14.8 Incentives for cities with good

development practices Provide financial or other incentive to local cities that practice air quality

- sensitive development. Yes Counties, Cities

14.9 Increase state gas tax Self Explanatory. No Need state legislation.

14.10 Pay

- As

- You

- Drive Insurance Self Explanatory. No Need state legislation.

No clear demonstration of air quality emission benefits so does not advance attainment date.

.

## Final 2012 AQMP Appendix IV

- C

Attachment B: 2012 South Coast PM2.5 AQMP Reasonably Available Control Measure (RACM) Analysis

- TCMs

IV

- C

- 51 Section 108 (f) 15. Programs for new construction and major reconstructions of paths, tracks or areas solely for the use by pedestrian or other Non

- motorized means of transportation when commercially feasible and in the public interest

Measure # Measure Title Description Has It Been Implemented Reasoned Justification for Not

Implementing Measure Implementing Agency or Agencies

15.1  Encouragement of pedestrian travel Promote public awareness and use of walking as an alternative to the motor vehicle. Yes AQMD, SCAG, CTCs, Employer

15.2 Pedestrian and bicycle overpasses where

safety dictates Ongoing implementation as development occurs. Yes Counties, Cities

Section 108 (f) 16. Program to encourage the voluntary removal from use and the marketplace of pre

- 1980 model year light duty vehicles and pre

- 1980 model light duty trucks

Measure # Measure Title Description Has It Been Implemented Reasoned Justification for Not

Implementing Measure Implementing Agency or Agencies

16.1 Counties assess ten dollar license plate fee to

fund repair/replacement program for high

emitters Self explanatory

. Yes ARB, BAR **

16.2 Buy vehicles older than 1975 Self explanatory

. Yes ARB, AQMD ***

16.3 Demolish impounded vehicles that are high

emitters Self explanatory. No Not economically feasible.

 This measure relates to AQMD Rule 2202, On

- Road Motor Vehicle Mitigation Options. Administered by AQMD, Rule 2202 provides a menu of options for employers in choosing how they will comply. Individual employe rs implement the mitigation option(s) that they have chosen

. ** Similar program administered with different funding source as part of smog check. *** Voluntary car scrapping programs to generate credits.

## Final 2012 AQMP Appendix IV

- C

Attachment B: 2012 South Coast PM2.5 AQMP Reasonably Available Control Measure (RACM) Analysis

- TCMs

IV

- C

- 52 Section 108 (f) 16. Program to encourage the voluntary removal from use and the marketplace of pre

- 1980 model year light duty vehicles and pre

- 1980 model light duty trucks

Measure # Measure Title Description Has It Been Implemented Reasoned Justification for Not

Implementing Measure Implementing Agency or Agencies

16.4 Do whatever is necessary to allow cities to

remove the engines of high emitting vehicles (pre

- 1980) that are abandoned and to be auctioned Self explanatory. No Not economically feasible.

16.5 Accelerated retirement program Identify high emitting vehicle age groups and develop a program to remove them from use. Yes ARB, AQMD