alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
_________________________________________ 

 

_______________________________________ 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

December 11, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

135893(77)(81) Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, 

Justices 

MARKELL VANSLEMBROUCK, a Minor, 

by his Next Friend KIMBERLY A. 

VANSLEMBROUCK, and KIMBERLY

A. VANSLEMBROUCK, Individually,

Plaintiffs-Appellees, 

 SC: 135893 

v COA: 273551 

Oakland CC: 2006-074585-NH 

ANDREW JAY HALPERIN, M.D., 

MICHIGAN INSTITUTE OF GYNECOLOGY 

& OBSTETRICS, P.C., and WILLIAM 

BEAUMONT HOSPITAL,

Defendants-Appellants. 

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion by plaintiffs-appellees for 

extension of the time for filing their brief on appeal is considered and it is GRANTED. 

The motion by Livonia Family Physicians, P.C. and others for leave to file a brief amicus 

curiae is considered and it is GRANTED. 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

December 11, 2008 

 Clerk
#### 1552.219-70--1552.219-74 [Reserved]
### §§241 to 246. Repealed. June 27, 1952, ch. 477, title IV, §403(a)(28), 66 Stat. 279, eff. Dec. 24, 1952

Sections, act May 26, 1926, ch. 398, §§1–6, 44 Stat. 654, 655, related to alien veterans of World War I.
#### 15.302 Source selection objective.

The objective of source selection is to select the proposal that represents the best value.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF FAIR GROUNDS CORPORATION FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED APRIL
30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-2000
<CASH>                                           5,695
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,567
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        141
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 8,693
<PP&E>                                          52,806
<DEPRECIATION>                                  18,496
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  46,383
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,704
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,525
<OTHER-SE>                                      29,501
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    46,383
<SALES>                                         25,595
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                30,211
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   25,150
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,404
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  10
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,556
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,316
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,240
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    206
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,447
<EPS-BASIC>                                       5.22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     5.22


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 810 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 810

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To facilitate construction of a bridge on certain property in Christian 
               County, Missouri, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RIVERSIDE BRIDGE PROJECT.

    (a) In General.--The Riverside Bridge Project is authorized to be 
carried out notwithstanding--
            (1) any agreement entered unto under, or restriction 
        pursuant to, section 404(b)(2) of the Robert T. Stafford 
        Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 
        5170c(b)(2)); or
            (2) any easement or other Federal restriction pursuant to 
        that Act (42 U.S.C. 5121 et seq.) that requires the covered 
        property to be maintained for open space, recreation, or 
        wetland management.
    (b) Conditions.--As a condition of the authorization under 
subsection (a)--
            (1) Christian County, Missouri, or an assignee shall--
                    (A) carry out the Riverside Bridge Project in a 
                manner that ensures that no flood damage attributable 
                to the Project occurs; and
                    (B) be liable for any such flood damage that does 
                occur; and
            (2) the Federal Government shall not be liable for future 
        flood damage that is caused by the Project.
    (c) Disaster Assistance Prohibited.--No future disaster assistance 
from any Federal source may be provided with respect to the covered 
property or any improvements thereon.
    (d) Definitions.--In this Act, the following definitions apply:
            (1) Covered property.--The term ``covered property'' means 
        the property--
                    (A) in Christian County, Missouri;
                    (B) conveyed to such County by the Riverside Inn, 
                Inc.; and
                    (C) that is approximately 1.5 acres and 482 lineal 
                feet adjacent to the westerly line of Riverside Road to 
                the center of Finley Creek.
            (2) Riverside bridge project.--The term ``Riverside Bridge 
        Project'' means the project to construct, maintain, and operate 
        a bridge on and over the covered property.

            Passed the Senate August 3, 2017.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
115th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                 S. 810

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To facilitate construction of a bridge on certain property in Christian 
               County, Missouri, and for other purposes.
```
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Joseph H. Singer, Respondent, against New York State Workmen’s Compensation Board et al., Appellants. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.

Appeal from a decision and award of the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Claimant was a physician employed by the Workmen’s Compensation Board and fell and was injured in the course of his employment. The board found accidental injury but the claimant was *887paid his full wages following the injury until his retirement on Janury 1, 1958. Following retirement claimant entered into a restricted medical practice. Some physical disability continued and the board has allowed the claimant an award for partial disability at the maximum rate of $36 per week from January 1, 1958. Claimant testified that he earned in medical fees an average of $600 a year and that this was due in part to his restricted physical activity as a result of his injury. There is no proof in the record as to what the claimant’s earning as a physician should be were it not for the injury, and although the rate of $36 a week, as fixed, may upon a full record be found to be warranted, there is not a sufficient basis in this record adequately to determine the rate. Award reversed, with costs to appellant State Insurance Fund, and the claim remitted to the board for further consideration. Bergan, P. J., Coon, Gibson, Herlihy and Reynolds, JJ., concur.
### §6511. Additional guidelines

#### (a) In general

The Secretary, the applicable governing State official, and the certifying agent shall utilize a system of residue testing to test products sold or labeled as organically produced under this chapter to assist in the enforcement of this chapter.

#### (b) Preharvest testing

The Secretary, the applicable governing State official, or the certifying agent may require preharvest tissue testing of any crop grown on soil suspected of harboring contaminants.

#### (c) Compliance review

#### (1) Inspection

If the Secretary, the applicable governing State official, or the certifying agent determines that an agricultural product sold or labeled as organically produced under this chapter contains any detectable pesticide or other non-organic residue or prohibited natural substance the Secretary, the applicable governing State official, or the certifying agent shall conduct an investigation to determine if the organic certification program has been violated, and may require the producer or handler of such product to prove that any prohibited substance was not applied to such product.

#### (2) Removal of organic label

If, as determined by the Secretary, the applicable governing State official, or the certifying agent, the investigation conducted under paragraph (1) indicates that the residue is—

(A) the result of intentional application of a prohibited substance; or

(B) present at levels that are greater than unavoidable residual environmental contamination as prescribed by the Secretary or the applicable governing State official in consultation with the appropriate environmental regulatory agencies;

such agricultural product shall not be sold or labeled as organically produced under this chapter.

(Pub. L. 101–624, title XXI, §2112, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 3942; Pub. L. 102–237, title X, §1001(4), Dec. 13, 1991, 105 Stat. 1893; Pub. L. 113–79, title X, §10005(a), Feb. 7, 2014, 128 Stat. 944.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2014—Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 113–79 struck out subsec. (d) which related to recordkeeping requirements for producers who operate a certified organic farm or handling operation.

1991—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 102–237 substituted "Preharvest" for "Pre-harvest" in heading.
### §216. Proceedings to enforce orders; injunction

If any stockyard owner, market agency, or dealer fails to obey any order of the Secretary other than for the payment of money while the same is in effect, the Secretary, or any party injured thereby, or the United States by its Attorney General, may apply to the district court for the district in which such person has his principal place of business for the enforcement of such order. If after hearing the court determines that the order was lawfully made and duly served and that such person is in disobedience of the same, the court shall enforce obedience to such order by a writ of injunction or other proper process, mandatory or otherwise, to restrain such person, his officers, agents, or representatives from further disobedience of such order or to enjoin upon him or them obedience to the same.

(Aug. 15, 1921, ch. 64, title III, §315, 42 Stat. 167.)

#### **Court Rules**

#### Federal Rules of Civil Procedure

Injunctions, see rule 65, Title 28, Appendix, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.
(February 6, 1961)

#### Vincenza Accardi, Respondent, v. Joseph A. Accardi, Appellant.

Motion by respondent to dismiss appeal denied, with leave to renew upon the argument of the appeal. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Ughetta, Kleinfeld and Pette, JJ., concur.
### §940d. Repealed. Pub. L. 115–334, title VI, §6601(b), Dec. 20, 2018, 132 Stat. 4776

Section, May 20, 1936, ch. 432, title III, §314, as added Pub. L. 101–508, title I, §1201, Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1388–7; amended Pub. L. 103–129, §2(b)(1), Nov. 1, 1993, 107 Stat. 1362; Pub. L. 103–354, title II, §235(a)(13), Oct. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 3221, related to limitations on authorization of appropriations.
Page 1 of 16 pages

  UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

[X]  QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXHIBIT F

Case: 1:12-cv-01410 Document #: 226-6 Filed: 05/12/17 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:1833
Case: 1:12-cv-01410 Document #: 226-6 Filed: 05/12/17 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:1834
Case: 1:12-cv-01410 Document #: 226-6 Filed: 05/12/17 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:1835
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

THE SECRETARY

MEMORANDUM

TO:Assistant Secretary for Elementary and

     Secondary Education

**Assistant Secretary for Vocational and**

**Adult Education**

Assistant Secretary for Educational Research

     and Improvement

Assistant Secretary for Postsecondary

     Education

Assistant Secretary for Special Education and 

     Rehabilitative Services

FROM:The Secretary

SUBJECT:Delegation of Authority

I.DELEGATION

Under the authority vested in me by Section 412 of the Department of Education Organization Act, P.L. 96-88, 20 U.S.C. 3472, I hereby delegate to you, your successor in function, or to anyone serving for you in an acting capacity, the authority to approve or disapprove State applications, consolidated State applications, State plans, and consolidated State plans for your respective program areas.

II.RESERVATION

Unless otherwise noted in existing or future delegations of authority, the following are not delegated:

A.Authority to sign documents for publication in the Federal Register other than those documents designated in the blanket delegation of authority to sign Federal Register documents to Principal Officers certified on June 14, 1994;

B.Authority to award contracts or discretionary grants delegated to the Grants and Contracts Service;

C. The authority to appoint, and fix compensation of, members of advisory councils; and

Page 2 - Delegation of Authority

D.Unless otherwise provided by law, the authority to submit reports to Congress or the President.

III. REDELEGATION

The authority to approve consolidated State applications and consolidated State plans may not be redelegated. You may, however, redelegate the authority to approve other State applications and State plans to officials whose positions have day-to-day responsibility for the program involved, except that this authority may not be redelegated lower than a program director or equivalent Department official. All redelegations must be prepared in accordance with the Administrative Communications System Directive A:GEN:1-105, "Delegations of Authority," dated August 15, 1989.

Within each Principal Office, any redelegation of these authorities is terminated each time that current Assistant Secretary departs, but these authorities may be redelegated upon confirmation of the incoming Assistant Secretary.

IV. CERTIFICATION AND EFFECTIVE DATE

This delegation is effective upon certification by the Department's Principal Delegation Control Officer and supersedes all previous delegations of this authority. I hereby ratify actions, within the scope of this delegation, taken by you prior to the date of the certification.

                      /s/                          

            Richard W. Riley

**OGC Clearance and Date:  /s/ R. Wexler, 7/11/96**

**Certification Date:  8/20/96**

**Departmental Delegations Control Officer:  /s/ Naty G. Beetle**

###### Control No.  EA/EV/53
Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2014-0363 Directorate Identifier: 2014-NE-08-AD

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If 

they do not, click (or Tab) into and then out of the changed cell.

Estimated Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Do not include oncondition costs here

Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

propeller, appliance)

Work-hours

(include 

access, testing, 

and close-up)

Labor 

cost 

(@$85/h

our)

Parts Cost Total Costs 

(labor + 

parts)

Number of 

U.S. 

Registered 

Products

Total Cost 

for U.S. Fleet

6.0 $ 510.00 $ 510.00 50 $25,500.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

The known number of products in compliance:

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $25,500

Costs covered under warranty (if known) $

On-Condition Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Work-hours 

(include access, 

testing, and closeup)

Labor cost 

(@$85/hour)

Parts Cost Cost per Product

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table 

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs):
Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? 

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No answer.

YES NO 

Explanation: 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES* NO 

*Explanation:
#### In the Matter of Alex S., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant.

[832 NYS2d 433]

Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Alma Cordova, J.), entered on or about May 11, 2006, as amended May 22, 2006, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon a fact-finding determination that he committed acts, which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crimes of grand larceny in the fourth degree, petit larceny and criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree, and placed him on probation for up to 12 months with 15 hours of community service, unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of vacating the finding as to petit larceny and dismissing that count of the petition, and otherwise affirmed, without costs. Appeal from order, same court and Judge, entered on or about August 9, 2006, unanimously dismissed as abandoned, without costs.

The court’s finding was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis for disturbing the court’s determinations concerning credibility *(see People v Bleakley,*69 NY2d 490, 495 [1987]). The evidence established that appellant grabbed the victim’s property from her hand, passing it to another person.

As the presentment agency concedes, the petit larceny count should be dismissed as a lesser included offense of grand larceny. Concur—Saxe, J.P., Marlow, Buckley, Catterson and McGuire, JJ.
#### 1552.228-70 Insurance liability to third persons.

As prescribed in 1528.301, insert the following clause:

# Insurance—Liability to Third Persons (OCT 2000)

(a)(1) Except as provided in subparagraph (2) below, the Contractor shall provide and maintain workers' compensation, employer's liability, comprehensive general liability (bodily injury), and comprehensive automobile liability (bodily injury and property damage) insurance, and such other insurance as the Contracting officer may require under this contract.

(2) The Contractor may, with the approval of the Contracting officer, maintain a self-insurance program; provided that, with respect to workers' compensation, the Contractor is qualified pursuant to statutory authority.

(3) All insurance required by this paragraph shall be in a form and amount and for those periods as the Contracting officer may require or approve and with insurers approved by the Contracting officer.

(b) The Contractor agrees to submit for the Contracting officer's approval, to the extent and in the manner required by the Contracting officer, any other insurance that is maintained by the Contractor in connection with the performance of this contract and for which the Contractor seeks reimbursement.

(c) The Contractor shall be reimbursed for that portion of the reasonable cost of insurance allocable to this contract, and required or approved under this clause, in accordance with its established cost accounting practices.

(End of clause)

[65 FR 58928, Oct. 3, 2000, as amended at 78 FR 46291, July 31, 2013]
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

# Financial Aid

### Paying for College

                - Avoiding Scams
                - Student Aid from ED
                - FAFSA (Free Application for Federal Student Aid)
                - Sources of Aid
                - Student Aid Estimator

### Repaying Loans

                - Deferments and Postponing Repayment
                - Forgiveness or Cancellation of Loans
                - Income Based Repayment for Student Loans
                - Repaying Student Loans
                - Retrieve Your Loan Information

### For Aid Professionals

                - Information for Financial Aid Professionals (IFAP)
                - Student Aid Publications and How to Order
                - Application to Participate in Federal Student Aid Programs
                - Training for Financial Aid Professionals
                - Postsecondary Education Participants System

## How Do I Find...

          - Student loans, forgiveness
          - College accreditation
          - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
          - FERPA
          - FAFSA
          - 1098, tax forms

More >

## Information About...

          - Transforming Teaching
          - Family and Community Engagement
          - Early Learning

 

|  |
|--|
|  |
|  | Grants & Contracts |  |
|  |
|  | Student Financial Aid |  |
|  |
|  | Research & Statistics |  |
|  |
|  | Policy & Guidance |  |
|  |
|  | Programs |  |
|  |

----

*Our mission*

Student Loans
Repaying LoansDefaulted LoansLoan ForgivenessLoan Servicers

Grants & Programs
Apply for Pell GrantsGrants ForecastApply for a GrantEligibility for Grants

Laws & Guidance
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)FERPACivil RightsNew IDEA Website

Data & Research
Education StatisticsPostsecondary Education DataED Data ExpressNation's Report CardWhat Works Clearinghouse

About Us
Contact UsED OfficesJobsPress ReleasesFAQsRecursos en españolBudget, PerformancePrivacy ProgramSubscribe to E-Mail Updates

----

          - Notices
          - FOIA
          - Privacy Policy
          - Accessibility
          - Security
          - Information quality
          - Inspector General
          - Whitehouse.gov
          - USA.gov
          - Benefits.gov
          - Regulations.gov