alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      2,619
<COMMON>                                     6,746,984
<OTHER-SE>                                 (6,749,603)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
(May 15, 1964)

#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Eugene Sullivan, Respondent, v. J. Edwin La Vallee, as Warden of Clinton Prison, Appellant.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Clinton County, sustaining relator’s writ of habeas corpus after a hearing. Order reversed, on the law and the facts, and petition and writ dismissed, without costs, on the authority of *Matter of Mulligan*v. *Murphy*(14 N Y 2d 223). Settle order. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds, Taylor and Hamm, JJ., concur.
----

----

|   | (1) | the      report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the      information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                            |   |   |   |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/      Thomas J. Meaney                                       |   |   |   |   |
| Thomas      J. MeaneyPresident      and Chief Financial Officer |   |   |   |   |
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                                                EXHIBIT 12

             BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
              COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                     (IN MILLIONS, EXCEPT RATIO AMOUNTS)
                                 (UNAUDITED)

                                             Nine Months Ended          
                                                September 30,
                                                1996     1995
                                              --------  -------
Earnings:
<S>                                           <C>       <C>

  Pre-tax income                              $   793   $   678

  Add:
    Interest and fixed charges,
      excluding capitalized interest               42        62

    Portion of rent under long-term
      operating leases representative
      of an interest factor                       112       110

  Less:  Undistributed equity in earnings
           of investments accounted for
           under the equity method                 (3)        -
                                              --------  -------


  Total earnings available for fixed charges  $   944      $850
                                              ========  =======

Fixed charges:

  Interest and fixed charges                  $    49   $    65

  Portion of rent under long-term operating
    leases representative of an interest
    factor                                        112       110
                                              --------  -------

  Total fixed charges                         $   161   $   175
                                              ========  =======

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges              5.86x     4.86x
                                              ========  =======
</TABLE>
### §388a. Authorization of appropriations

There is authorized to be appropriated each fiscal year necessary appropriations to enable the Secretary of Agriculture to carry on the experiments contemplated by section 388 of this title.

(Apr. 16, 1928, ch. 377, §3, 45 Stat. 431.)
§ 34.30 Purpose of procurement standards. Section 34.31 sets forth requirements necessary to ensure: ( a ) Compliance of recipients' procurements that use Federal funds with applicable Federal statutes and executive orders.
( b ) Proper stewardship of Federal funds used in recipients' procurements.
###### Editorial Note on Part 1553

#### Editorial Note:

Forms referenced in part 1553 do not appear in the Code of Federal Regulations.

#### 1553.232-74 EPA Form 1900-10, Contractor's Cumulative Claim and Reconciliation.

As prescribed in 1532.170(a), the EPA Form 1900-10 shall be used for an accounting of the cumulative charges and costs for cost-reimbursement contracts from the inception of the contract to completion. It shall be submitted by the Contractor along with the completion voucher.
### §51. Short title

This chapter shall be known by the short title of "United States Cotton Standards Act."

(Mar. 4, 1923, ch. 288, §1, 42 Stat. 1517.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Act Mar. 4, 1923, ch. 288, §14, 42 Stat. 1520, provided: "That this Act [enacting this chapter] shall become effective on and after August 1, 1923."
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

EASTERN DIVISION 

JAMES BRAND, BARRY FARMER, 

MARK GRAHAM, KEVIN 

JACKSON, MICHAEL JACKSON, 

JOSE VIGIL, and CHRISTOPHER 

WOODARD, 

 Plaintiffs, 

 v. 

COMCAST CORPORATION and 

COMCAST CABLE 

COMMUNICATIONS 

MANAGEMENT, LLC, 

 Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

) 

No. 12 CV 1122 

Magistrate Judge Young B. Kim 

June 27, 2016 

ORDER

UPON CONSIDERATION of the Parties’ Joint Motion for Approval of 

Settlement, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED as follows: 

1. The Parties’ proposed Settlement is approved, including the releases 

of claims, the payments to Plaintiffs, and payment of attorneys’ fees and costs 

as set forth therein; 

2. The action is dismissed in its entirety without prejudice, which will 

then become with prejudice once the settlement is funded by Defendants; and 

3. The court retains jurisdiction until 31 days after the date this Order is 

entered to enforce the terms of the Settlement, including the release of 

claims. 

 ENTER:

 

 ____________________________________ 

 Young B. Kim 

 United States Magistrate Judge

Case: 1:12-cv-01122 Document #: 250 Filed: 06/27/16 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:8930
#### Marie Swartz, administratrix of the estate of George Swartz, deceased, appellee, v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Company, appellant.

Gen. No. 7,376.

Action for wrongful death. Judgment for plaintiff. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Kane county; the Hon. William J. Pulton, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the April term, 1924.

Reversed and remanded.

Opinion filed March 27, 1925.

John A. Russell and Nye P. Morehouse, for appellant; Nelson J.

Wilcox, of counsel. Egan & Tobin and Peffers & Wing, for appellee.

Mr. Justice Jones

delivered the opinion of the court.
### §747. Repealed. June 25, 1948, ch. 645, §21, 62 Stat. 862, eff. Sept. 1, 1948

Section, act Oct. 14, 1940, ch. 876, title I, subchap. III, §347, 54 Stat. 1168, related to saving clauses. Similar subject matter is contained in note under section 1101 of this title.
EXHIBITD

Case: 1:12-cv-00163 Document #: 1-4 Filed: 01/10/12 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:19
•• ••••• - TRACY L

COfMEH

111 Ew.co. •••AVEfU»

•• WA'''' WIAa2

Case: 1:12-cv-00163 Document #: 1-4 Filed: 01/10/12 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:20
**Exhibit 99.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION, 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarterended February 28, 2003 (the Report) by Farmland Industries, Inc. (the Company), theundersigned, as the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certified pursuant to18 U.S.C., ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or Section 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange act of 1934; and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

# Dated:  April 14, 2003

 

                                                         /s/ STEVEN R. RHODES                                                               Steven R. Rhodes,                                                            Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               NOV-29-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                    MAY-31-1997
<CASH>                                               2,829
<SECURITIES>                                        58,883
<RECEIVABLES>                                       30,364
<ALLOWANCES>                                           800
<INVENTORY>                                         31,218
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   124,444
<PP&E>                                             111,070
<DEPRECIATION>                                      80,691
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     157,965
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               16,839
<BONDS>                                                588
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                1,313
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                         132,131
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       157,965
<SALES>                                             78,415
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    78,415
<CGS>                                               68,028
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       68,028
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     7,178
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       200
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      32
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      5,945
<INCOME-TAX>                                         1,900
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  4,045
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                         4,045
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         0.71
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0.71
        


</TABLE>
### §6512. Other production and handling practices

If a production or handling practice is not prohibited or otherwise restricted under this chapter, such practice shall be permitted unless it is determined that such practice would be inconsistent with the applicable organic certification program.

(Pub. L. 101–624, title XXI, §2113, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 3943.)
#### 1323.204 Procurement exemptions.

The designee authorized to exempt the procurement of an ENERGY STAR or Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP)-designated product as described in FAR 23.203 is set forth in CAM 1301.70.
§ 233.5 Responsibilities. ( a ) The Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness (USD(P&R)) shall: ( 1 ) Execute the responsibilities of the Presidential designee in accordance with DoD Directive 5124.02 (available at *https://www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/Documents/DD/issuances/dodd/512402p.pdf*).
( 2 ) Administer the FVAP in accordance with Executive Order 12642, 10 U.S.C. 1566a, 52 U.S.C. 20506; 52 U.S.C. Ch. 203.
( 3 ) Coordinate and implement actions that may be necessary to discharge Federal responsibilities assigned in DoD Directive 5124.02, Executive Order 12642, 10 U.S.C. 1566, 52 U.S.C. 20506; 52 U.S.C. Ch. 203.
( 4 ) Develop policy and procedures to implement DoD responsibilities under 52 U.S.C. 20506 (also known as the “National Voter Registration Act (NVRA)”).
( 5 ) Grant or deny any hardship exemption waivers submitted by a State pursuant to 52 U.S.C. 20302(g) (after consultation with the Attorney General's designee) and inform the State of the results of the waiver request.
( b ) The Heads of the DoD Components and the Uniformed Services shall disseminate voting information and assist eligible voters, as required, in their respective organization, following the procedures in § 233.6(b) of this part.
[77 FR 57487, Sept. 18, 2012, as amended at 84 FR 59722, Nov. 6, 2019]
#### 14.000 Scope of part.

This part prescribes (a) the basic requirements of contracting for supplies and services (including construction) by sealed bidding, (b) the information to be included in the solicitation (invitation for bids), (c) procedures concerning the submission of bids, (d) requirements for opening and evaluating bids and awarding contracts, and (e) procedures for two-step sealed bidding.

[48 FR 42171, Sept. 19, 1983, as amended at 50 FR 1737, Jan. 11, 1985; 50 FR 52429, Dec. 23, 1985]
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Emerson Radio Corp. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006, filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission, Adrian Ma, Chief Executive Officer, and John D. Florian,
Deputy Chief Financial Officer, of the Company each hereby certifies pursuant to
18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates
presented and the consolidated result of operations of the Company for the
periods presented.


Dated: August 21, 2006

                                   By: /s/ Adrian Ma
                                   -----------------
                                   Adrian Ma
                                   Chief Executive Officer


                                   By: /s/ John D. Florian
                                   -----------------------
                                   John D. Florian
                                   Deputy Chief Financial Officer and
                                   Controller


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter
63 of Title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form
10-Q or as a separate disclosure document.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Emerson Radio Corp. and will be
retained by Emerson Radio Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
September 27, 2012

Mr. Doug A. Lee Northrop Grumman Technical Services 4067 Enterprise Way Sierra Vista, AZ 85635

Dear Mr. Lee:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from § 91.203(b) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We entered your September 17, 2012, exemption request on behalf of Northrop Grumman Technical Services into the public docket (N o. FAA-2012-1023), but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you m ust send the information described earlier to reach us within 30 days. We will consider the docket on your request open until we receive this required information from you. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

/s/ Ida M. Klepper Manager, Airmen and Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure3

Project No.: AFS-12-554-E

Project Officer: _______________

ARM-105:TTHOMAS:09/2112Doc# 34987
ARM-1/100/105:AFS-200
#### Joan M. Reis, by Ruth Reis, Her Guardian ad Litem, et al., Respondents, v. Robert Badian, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from an order of the Supreme Court at Special Term which granted plaintiffs’ motion to modify a prior order of the court conditionally dismissing the complaint for failure to prosecute the action. It does not appear upon the record before us that the failure to show merit to the plaintiffs’ action was raised by defendant in opposition to the motion to modify the prior order of dismissal. In the circumstances presented we think that Special Term did not improvidently exercise its discretion. *(SaVoaggio*v. *California Packing Co.,*12 A D 2d 557.) Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. Present — Bergan, P. J., Gibson, Herlihy, Reynolds and Taylor, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated balance sheet as of March 31, 2000 and the consolidated statement
of operations for three months ended Mrch 31, 2000 and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                       2,004,400
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,715,600
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    251,060
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,382,700
<PP&E>                                       9,389,900
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,369,400
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,403,900
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,211,400
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  5,400,000
<COMMON>                                     8,293,400
<OTHER-SE>                                 (5,940,900)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,403,900
<SALES>                                      3,464,100
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,464,100
<CGS>                                        2,708,400
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,708,400
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               524,700
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              43,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            188,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   188,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.01


</TABLE>
#### Lillian McLaughlin, an Infant, by Her Guardian ad Litem, Henry McLaughlin, et al., Respondents, v. Frances Martin et al., Appellants.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been caused by defendant Martin’s negligence in the operation of an automobile, causing it to jump the curb and strike the infant plaintiff while she was standing on the sidewalk awaiting a bus, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated February 17, 1960 (and entered Feb. 19, 1960), granting summary judgment in favor of plaintiffs, pursuant to rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice. Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion denied, without costs. Defendants claim that the driver of the automobile was confronted with an emergent situation. In our opinion, it was error to determine summarily on motion, on this record, that plaintiffs’ causes of action *790were established sufficiently to warrant the court as a matter of law in directing judgment in their favor (cf. *Gerard*v. *Inglese,*12 A D 2d 381). Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Ughetta, Kleinfeld and Christ, JJ., concur.
#### 1401.602 Contracting officers.