alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**Certifications**

 

I, Jeffrey D. Cushman, certify that:

 

1.             I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-Kof BancTec, Inc;

 

2.             Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.             Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly presentin all material respects the financial condition, results of operations andcash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport.

 

4.             Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

a) Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b) Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation, and

 

c) Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.             Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions).

 

a) Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial data; and

 

b) Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

 

 
| Date: April 7, 2005 |     | /s/ Jeffrey D. Cushman                               |   |
|---------------------|----------|------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                |     | *Jeffrey D. Cushman*                                 |
| * *            | * * | *Senior Vice President and  Chief Financial Officer* |

 

----
#### Otsego Mutual Fire Insurance Company, as Subrogee of Carmile Lauria, et al., Appellant, v Hartford Fire Insurance Company, Respondent.

— In an action by the plaintiff insurance company, as subrogee, to recover from the defendant insurance company one half the amount paid for a fire loss, plaintiff appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated August 21, 1978, as, upon reargument, adhered to the original determination granting defendant’s motion for summary *907judgment. Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, with $50 costs and disbursements. The issue on the motion for summary judgment was not whether homeowner Camile Lauria delivered to respondent, Hartford Fire Insurance Co., a notice of cancellation (see *Russ Togs v Fidelity-Phenix Ins. Co.,*36 AD2d 706), but whether prior to the fire of January 30, 1976, Lauria accepted an offer from Hartford of a renewal policy. In our opinion, as a matter of law, there was no evidence whatsoever that prior to the January 30, 1976 fire Camile Lauria intended to, and did in fact, conduct herself in any manner which could be construed as an acceptance of Hartford’s offer. On the contrary, her procuring a policy from appellant, her complaint and her deposition in her suit against appellant, and the affidavit of Mr. Bosley, an insurance adjuster, conclusively demonstrate that Camile Lauria actually had rejected respondent’s offer of a renewal policy (see *Berman v North British & Mercantile Ins. Co.,*74 Mise 431; *Paccione v Home Ind. Co.,*244 App Div 339, affd 273 NY 643). Mollen, P. J., Hopkins, Rabin and Martuscello, JJ., concur.
#### 1417 Bedford Realty Company, Inc., Respondent, v. Sun Oil Company, Inc., Appellant, et al., Defendants.

In an action for an injunction and to recover damages for injury to real property allegedly sustained as a result of the negligence of the defendant Sun Oil Company, Inc., in excavating upon its own property immediately adjacent to plaintiff’s premises, in violation of the Administrative Code of the City of New York (§ C26-385.0), said defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated December 18, 1963, which granted plaintiff’s motion for a discovery and inspection pursuant to statute (CPLR 3120, subd. 2); which_authorized plaintiff to “ enter upon [said] defendant’s premises and take borings, tests and measurements to determine the depth” of the prior excavation thereon; and *685which, conditioned such relief upon the furnishing by plaintiff of a $5,000 bond (to be approved by a Justice of the court) to indemnify the defendant owner of the premises against any damage resulting from such discovery. Order modified by increasing from $5,000 to $10,000 the amount of the said bond. As so modified, the order is affirmed, without costs. The discovery and inspection to the extent prescribed shall proceed within 40 days after entry of the order hereon upon 7 days’ written notice by plaintiff or on such date or dates as the parties may mutually agree by written stipulation, provided that the said bond shall have been approved by a Justice of the Supreme Court and that a copy thereof shall have been served upon defendant prior to or together with such notice or stipulation. Under the circumstances here, the Special Term properly exercised its discretion in directing such disclosure pursuant to the statute (CPLR 3120, subd. 2). However, in our opinion the amount of the bond as fixed by the Special Term was inadequate to the extent indicated. Beldoek, P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Brennan and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>





                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



        In connection with the Quarterly Report of Federal Screw Works (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Quarterly Report"),
I, W. T. ZurSchmiede, Jr.,Chairman of the Board, Chief Financial Officer,
Secretary of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

        (1) The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
and

        (2) The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.


                                               /s/ W.T.ZurSchmiede, Jr.
                                               --------------------------------
                                               W.T.ZurSchmiede, Jr., Chairman,
                                               Chief Financial Officer and
                                               Secretary of Federal Screw Works


  April 14, 2004
#### 1404.805 Disposal of contract files.

Disposition of files shall be accomplished in accordance with 384 DM.
#### 1631.205-82 Audits.

Carriers should ensure that the public accounting firms with which they contract for audits of FEHB accounts are registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB).

[71 FR 3015, Jan. 19, 2006]
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350

(Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

BNSF Railway Company

In connection with the Quarterly Report of BNSF Railway Company (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), the undersigned, Matthew K. Rose, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Thomas N. Hund, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies that, to his
knowledge on the date hereof:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: April 25, 2006



|                                                |  |  |  |                                                     
|----------------------------------------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Matthew K. Rose                             |  |  |  | /s/Thomas N. Hund                                   
|Matthew K. Rose                                 |  |  |  | Thomas N. Hund                                      
|Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer |  |  |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to BNSF
Railway Company and will be retained by BNSF Railway Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



E-5
P. 1 

# OAR Box 

# 1158 Prepped by RyanDugan



### Document

Number: 

# 2 ) 11-A-2 4 Docket Number: 

# A-88-0 2

Printed 4/28/20082:34:11 PM

Sheet 2 of 349P. 2 

## A-88-0 2

Informatio n o n healt ho r ris k assessmen t wa s remove d fromth e docket . Thi s informatio nwa s compile d befor e th e Clea nAi r Ac t Amendment s (1990 ) bu t wa s no t use d i n th e developmen t o f th e chromiu

mNESHAP .
#### 19.502-11 Solicitation notice regarding administration of change orders for construction.

See 36.211 for the requirement to provide a notice to offerors regarding definitization of equitable adjustments for change orders under construction contracts.

[87 FR 58231, Sept. 23, 2022]
#### 1852.245-83 Real property management requirements.

As prescribed in 1845.107-70(n), insert the following clause:

# Real Property Management Requirements (JAN 2011)

(a) In addition to the requirements of the FAR Government Property Clause incorporated in this contract (FAR 52.245-1), the Contractor shall comply with the following in performance of any maintenance, construction, modification, demolition, or management activities of any Government real property:

(1) NPD 8800.14, Policy for Real Property Management.

(2) NPR 8831.2, Facility Maintenance Management.

[Insert any real property related Center requirements here]

(b) Within 30 calendar days following award, the Contractor shall provide a plan for maintenance of Government real property provided for use under this contract. The Contractor's maintenance program shall enable the identification, disclosure, and performance of normal and routine preventative maintenance and repair. The Contractor shall disclose and report to the Contracting Officer the need for replacement and/or capital rehabilitation. Upon acceptance by the Contracting Officer, the program shall become a requirement under this contract.

(c) Title to parts replaced by the Contractor in carrying out its normal maintenance obligations shall pass to and vest in the Government upon completion of their installation in the facilities. The Contractor shall keep the property free and clear of all liens and encumbrances.

(d) The Contractor shall keep records of all work done to real property, including plans, drawings, charts, warranties, and manuals. Records shall be complete and current. Record of all transactions shall be auditable. The Government shall have access to these records at all reasonable times, for the purposes of reviewing, inspecting, and evaluating the Contractor's real property management effectiveness. When real property is disposed of under this contract, the Contractor shall deliver the related records to the Government.

(e) The Contracting Officer may direct the Contractor in writing to reduce the work required by the maintenance program authorized in paragraph (b) of this clause at any time.

(End of clause)

[76 FR 2006, Jan. 12, 2011, as amended at 81 FR 24501, Apr. 26, 2016]
§ 935.120 Authority. Peace officers— ( a ) Have the authority of a sheriff at common law;
( b ) May serve any process on Wake Island that is allowed to be served under a Federal or State law; the officer serving the process shall execute any required affidavit of service;
( c ) May conduct sanitation or fire prevention inspections;
( d ) May inspect motor vehicles, boats, and aircraft;
( e ) May confiscate property used in the commission of a crime;
( f ) May deputize any member of the Air Force serving on active duty or civilian employee of the Department of the Air Force to serve as a peace officer;
( g ) May investigate accidents and suspected crimes;
( h ) May direct vehicular or pedestrian traffic;
( i ) May remove and impound abandoned or unlawfully parked vehicles, boats, or aircraft, or vehicles, boats, or aircraft interfering with fire control apparatus or ambulances;
( j ) May take possession of property lost, abandoned, or of unknown ownership;
( k ) May enforce quarantines;
( l ) May impound and destroy food, fish, or beverages found unsanitary;
( m ) May be armed;
( n ) May exercise custody over persons in arrest or confinement;
( o ) May issue citations for violations of this part; and
( p ) May make arrests, as provided for in § 935.122.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED MAY 16, 2019

NO. 03-18-00834-CV

C. S. B., Appellant

v.

Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 98TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES KELLY AND SMITH

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the trial court on November 27, 2018. Having 

reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error 

in the trial court’s judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment. Because 

appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
#### § 750.30 Denial of the claim.

Final denial of an administrative claim shall be in writing and shall be sent to the claimant, his duly authorized agent or legal representative by certified or registered mail, with return receipt requested. The notification of final denial shall include the reasons for the denial. The notification shall include a statement informing the claimant of his right to file suit in the appropriate Federal district court not later than 6 months after the date of the mailing of the notification. 28 CFR 14.9(a).
#### 15.204-1 Uniform contract format.

(a) Contracting officers shall prepare solicitations and resulting contracts using the uniform contract format outlined in Table 15-1 of this subsection.

(b) Solicitations using the uniform contract format shall include Parts I, II, III, and IV (see 15.204-2 through 15.204-5). Upon award, contracting officers shall not physically include Part IV in the resulting contract, but shall retain it in the contract file. (See 4.1201(c).) The representations and certifications are incorporated by reference in the contract by using 52.204-19 (see 4.1202(b)) or for acquisitions of commercial products and commercial services see 52.212-4(v).

Table 15-1—Uniform Contract Format

| Section | Title |
| --- | --- |
| **Part I—The Schedule** | |
| A | Solicitation/contract form. |
| B | Supplies or services and prices/costs. |
| C | Description/specifications/statement of work. |
| D | Packaging and marking. |
| E | Inspection and acceptance. |
| F | Deliveries or performance. |
| G | Contract administration data. |
| H | Special contract requirements. |
| **Part II—Contract Clauses** | |
| I | Contract clauses. |
| **Part III—List of Documents, Exhibits, and Other Attachments** | |
| J | List of attachments. |
| **Part IV—Representations and Instructions** | |
| K | Representations, certifications, and other statements of offerors or respondents. |
| L | Instructions, conditions, and notices to offerors or respondents. |
| M | Evaluation factors for award. |

[[62 FR 51230](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/62-FR-51230), Sept. 30, 1997, as amended at [71 FR 57363](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/71-FR-57363), Sept. 28, 2006; [79 FR 70342](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/79-FR-70342), Nov. 25, 2014; [86 FR 61025](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/86-FR-61025), Nov. 4, 2021]
§ 865.105 Jurisdiction and authority. The DRB has jurisdiction and authority in cases of former military personnel who, at the time of their separation from the Service, were members of the US Army Aviation components (Aviation Section, Signal Corps; Air Service; Air Corps; or Air Forces) prior to September 17, 1947, or the US Air Force. The DRB does not have jurisdiction and authority concerning personnel of other armed services who at the time of their separation, were assigned to duty with the Army Air Forces or the US Air Force. ( a ) The DRB's review is based on the former member's available military records, issues submitted by the former member, or his counsel and on any other evidence that is presented to the DRB. The DRB determines whether the type of discharge or dismissal the former member received is equitable and proper; if not, the DRB instructs the USAF Manpower and Personnel Center (AFMPC) to change the discharge reason or to issue a new character of discharge according to the DRB's findings.
( b ) The DRB is not authorized to revoke any discharge, to reinstate any person who has been separated from the military service, or to recall any person to active duty.
( c ) The DRB, on its own motion, may review a case that appears likely to result in a decision favorable to the former military member, without the member's knowledge or presence. In this case, if the decision is: ( 1 ) Favorable, the DRB directs AFMPC to notify the former member accordingly at the member's last known address.
( 2 ) Unfavorable, the DRB returns the case to the files without any record of formal action; the DRB then reconsiders the case without prejudice in accordance with normal procedures.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1



                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying Form 10-Q (the "Report") of Jo-Ann Stores,
Inc. (the "Company") for the period ending August 2, 2003, I, Alan Rosskamm,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

(1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
        15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
        respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
        Company.



Dated: September 5, 2003


                              /s/ Alan Rosskamm
                              -----------------
                              Alan Rosskamm,
                              President and Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
1203.101-3 Agency regulations. ( a ) Standards of Ethical Conduct for Employees of the Executive Branch, 5 CFR part 2635, and the Supplemental Standards of Ethical Conduct for Employees of the Department of Transportation, 5 CFR part 6001, apply to all DOT employees.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, May 24, 2017. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, May 24, 2017 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A17D0436. KRIS GRICE v. KATHERINE REILLY.
Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.
LC NUMBERS: 12CV2774
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 4.2

Eastern Division

Deckers Outdoor Corporation

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:12−cv−00377

Honorable Ronald A. Guzman

DOES 1−100, et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Tuesday, February 7, 2012:

 MINUTE entry before Honorable Sheila Finnegan: Motion hearing held on

2/7/2012. Plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction [21] is taken under advisement.

Report and recommendation to be issued by mail. Mailed notice. (is, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:12-cv-00377 Document #: 27 Filed: 02/07/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:733
#### STONE, Respondent, v. CRONIN, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

November 13, 1903.)

Action by Medad E. Stone, as administrator, etc., against Bridget Cronin, individually, etc.

No opinion. Motion denied, with leave to renew at the next term, unless the case is then in readiness for argument.