alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §1458. Compilation of naturalization statistics and payment for equipment

The Attorney General is authorized and directed to prepare from the records in the custody of the Service a report upon those heretofore seeking citizenship to show by nationalities their relation to the numbers of aliens annually arriving and to the prevailing census populations of the foreign-born, their economic, vocational, and other classification, in statistical form, with analytical comment thereon, and to prepare such report annually hereafter. Payment for the equipment used in preparing such compilation shall be made from the appropriation for the enforcement of this chapter by the Service.

(June 27, 1952, ch. 477, title III, ch. 2, §347, 66 Stat. 266.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original, "this Act", meaning act June 27, 1952, ch. 477, 66 Stat. 163, known as the Immigration and Nationality Act, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1101 of this title and Tables.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective 180 days after June 27, 1952, see section 407 of act June 27, 1952, set out as a note under section 1101 of this title.

#### Abolition of Immigration and Naturalization Service and Transfer of Functions

For abolition of Immigration and Naturalization Service, transfer of functions, and treatment of related references, see note set out under section 1551 of this title.
- '09222257 Complaint' of '24-00447-F San Francisco'
- '09222257 Recipient Notification Letter' of '24-00447-F San Francisco'
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2



                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying Form 10-Q (the "Report") of Jo-Ann Stores,
Inc. (the "Company") for the period ending August 2, 2003, I, Brian P. Carney,
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

(1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
        15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
        respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
        Company.



Dated: September 5, 2003



                           /s/ Brian P. Carney
                           ---------------------------
                           Brian P. Carney,
                           Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### 1515.404-474 Waivers.

Under unusual circumstances, the SCM may specifically waive the requirement for the use of the guidelines. Such exceptions shall be justified in writing, and authorized only in situations where the guidelines method is unsuitable.

[64 FR 47410, Aug. 31, 1999, as amended at 67 FR 5072, Feb. 4, 2002]
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. James Overby, Appellant.

Motion to dismiss appeal denied. Appellant’s cross motion granted and time for filing and serving records and briefs on appeal enlarged to August 1, 1960. Respondent’s brief must be filed on or before August 26, 1960 if appeal is to be argued at September 1960 Term.
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 710 

To reinstate and extend the deadline for commencement of construction of 

a hydroelectric project involving Jennings Randolph Dam. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 23, 2017 

Mr. MANCHIN (for himself and Mrs. CAPITO) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To reinstate and extend the deadline for commencement of 

construction of a hydroelectric project involving Jennings 

Randolph Dam. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REINSTATEMENT AND EXTENSION OF TIME 

4 FOR A FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COM5 MISSION PROJECT INVOLVING JENNINGS 

6 RANDOLPH DAM. 

7 (a) EXTENSION OF TIME.—Notwithstanding the time 

8 period specified in section 13 of the Federal Power Act 

9 (16 U.S.C. 806) that would otherwise apply to the Federal 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 710 IS

1 Energy Regulatory Commission project numbered 12715 

2 (referred to in this section as the ‘‘project’’), the Federal 

3 Energy Regulatory Commission (referred to in this section 

4 as the ‘‘Commission’’) may, at the request of the licensee 

5 for the project, and after reasonable notice, in accordance 

6 with the good faith, due diligence, and public interest re7 quirements of, and the procedures of the Commission 

8 under, that section, extend the time period during which 

9 the licensee is required to commence the construction of 

10 the project for not more than 3 consecutive 2-year periods 

11 that begin on the date of the expiration of the extension 

12 originally issued by the Commission. 

13 (b) OBLIGATION OF LICENSEE.—Any obligation of 

14 the licensee for the project for the payment of annual 

15 charges under section 10(e) of the Federal Power Act (16 

16 U.S.C. 803(e)) shall commence on the expiration of the 

17 time period to commence construction of the project, as 

18 extended by the Commission under subsection (a). 

19 (c) REINSTATEMENT OF EXPIRED LICENSE.— 

20 (1) IN GENERAL.—If the period required for 

21 the commencement of construction of the project has 

22 expired before the date of enactment of this Act, the 

23 Commission may reinstate the license effective as of 

24 the date of the expiration of the license. 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 710 IS

1 (2) EXTENSION.—If the Commission reinstates 

2 the license under paragraph (1), the first extension 

3 authorized under subsection (a) shall take effect on 

4 the date of the expiration of the license. 

Æ 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### 1301.602-170 Provisions and clauses.

Insert clause 1352.201-70, *Contracting Officer's Authority,* in all solicitations and contracts.
#### Stephen E. Federowitz, Respondent, v. Potomac Insurance Co. et al., Appellants.

Respondent’s motion to file and serve brief granted.
§ 634.31 Parking. ( a ) The most efficient use of existing on- and off-street parking space should be stressed on a nonreserved (first-come, first-served) basis.
( b ) Reserved parking facilities should be designated as parking by permit or numerically by category of eligible parkers. Designation of parking spaces by name, grade, rank, or title should be avoided.
( c ) Illegal parking contributes to congestion and slows traffic flow on an installation. Strong enforcement of parking restrictions results in better use of available parking facilities and eliminates conditions causing traffic accidents.
( d ) The “Denver boot” device is authorized for use as a technique to assist in the enforcement of parking violations where immobilization of the POV is necessary for safety. Under no circumstances should the device be used to punish or “teach a lesson” to violators. Booting should not be used if other reasonably effective but less restrictive means of enforcement (such as warnings, ticketing, reprimands, revocations, or suspensions of on-post driving privileges) are available. Procedures for booting must be developed as follows: ( 1 ) Local standing operating procedures (SOPs) must be developed to control the discretion of enforcers and limit booting to specific offenses. SOPs should focus on specific reasons for booting, such as immobilization of unsafe, uninspected, or unregistered vehicles or compelling the presence of repeat offenders. All parking violations must be clearly outlined in the installation traffic code.
( 2 ) Drivers should be placed on notice that particular violations or multiple violations may result in booting. Also, drivers must be provided with a prompt hearing and an opportunity to obtain the release of their property.
( 3 ) To limit liability, drivers must be warned when a boot is attached to their vehicle and instructed how to have the boot removed without damaging the vehicle.
### §950aaa–4. Regulations

Not later than 180 days after April 4, 1996, the Secretary shall issue regulations to carry out this chapter.

(Pub. L. 101–624, title XXIII, §2335, as added Pub. L. 104–127, title VII, §704, Apr. 4, 1996, 110 Stat. 1112.)

#### Termination of Section

For termination of section by section 1(b) of Pub. L. 102–551, see Termination of Chapter note set out under section 950aaa of this title.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 950aaa–4, Pub. L. 101–624, title XXIII, §2335, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 4021; Pub. L. 102–551, §1(c), Oct. 28, 1992, 106 Stat. 4100; Pub. L. 103–354, title II, §235(b)(4)(C), Oct. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 3222, related to rural community access to advanced telecommunications, prior to the general amendment of this chapter by Pub. L. 104–127.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Analysis by Office of Technology Assessment

Pub. L. 101–624, title XXIII, §2385, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 4051, provided that Office of Technology Assessment was to include, in study of effects of information age technology on rural America, analysis of feasibility of ensuring that rural citizens in their homes and schools had ability to acquire, by computer, information in a national library, and specified contents of such analysis, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 104–127, title VII, §708, Apr. 4, 1996, 110 Stat. 1112.
#### In the Matter of Richard M. Tilker (Admitted as Richard Mark Tilker), an Attorney, Respondent. Departmental Disciplinary Committee for the First Judicial Department, Petitioner.

First Department,

March 29, 1979

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Michael Alan Schwartz*of counsel *(Nicholas C. Cooper,*attorney), for petitioner.

No one appearing on behalf of respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

*Per Curiam.*

Petitioner moves for an order pursuant to subdivision 4 of section 90 of the Judiciary Law striking respondent’s name from the roll of attorneys on the ground that respondent is *29subject to automatic disbarment following a Federal felony conviction.

Respondent, admitted to practice by the Second Department on March 5, 1975 under the name Richard Mark Tilker, was convicted after trial in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York of conspiring to commit offenses against the United States by unlawfully receiving stolen securities in violation of sections 2315, 371 and 2 of title 18 of the United States Code, Federal felonies.

Conviction of a Federal felony carries with it automatic disbarment pursuant to subdivision 4 of section 90 of the Judiciary Law *(Matter of Thies,*45 NY2d 865; *Matter of Chu,*42 NY2d 490).

Accordingly, the application by petitioner for an order directing respondent’s disbarment should be granted and the clerk directed to strike respondent’s name from the roll of attorneys and counselors at law in the State of New York.

Murphy, P. J., Sandler, Sullivan, Markewich and Bloom, JJ., concur.

Respondent’s name stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors at law in the State of New York.
###### Editorial Note on Part 842

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 842 appear at 81 FR 83688, Nov. 22, 2016.

#### § 842.97 Claims payable.

Claims arising from noncombat activities of the United States when caused by ANG members performing duty under 32 U.S.C. and acting within the scope of their employment, whether or not such injuries or damages arose out of their negligent or wrongful acts or omissions.

[81 FR 83697, Nov. 22, 2016]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

EASTERN DIVISION 

NICK PEARSON, On Behalf of Himself and All 

Others Similarly Situated, 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

TARGET CORPORATION, a Minnesota 

Corporation, 

 Defendant. 

Case No. 11cv07972 

Honorable Robert W. Gettleman 

NOTICE OF MOTION TO DISMISS OF 

DEFENDANT TARGET CORPORATION

 To: All Parties and Their Attorneys of Record: 

 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on Thursday, February 9, 2012 at 9:15 am or as soon 

thereafter as counsel may be heard, counsel shall appear before the Honorable Robert W. 

Gettleman, in courtroom 1703, 219 South Dearborn Street, the courtroom usually occupied by 

him, and shall then and there present its Motion to Dismiss, a copy of which is attached hereto. 

 

Dated: January 26, 2012 /s/ Bradley J. Andreozzi 

Bradley J. Andreozzi (ARDC No. 6257334) 

bradley.andreozzi@dbr.com

Justin O. Kay (ARDC No.6286557) 

justin.kay@dbr.com

DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP 

191 North Wacker Drive, Suite 3700 

Chicago, IL 60606-1698 

Tel: (312) 569-1000 

Fax: (312) 569-3000 

Kara L. McCall (ARDC No. 6272681) 

Case: 1:11-cv-07972 Document #: 16 Filed: 01/26/12 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:50
- 2 -

kmccall@sidley.com

Shelby Feuerbach (ARDC No. 6296364) 

sfeuerbach@sidley.com

SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP 

One South Dearborn Street 

Chicago, IL 60603 

Tel: (312) 853-7000 

Fax: (312) 853-7036 

Counsel for Defendant Target Corporation

Case: 1:11-cv-07972 Document #: 16 Filed: 01/26/12 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:51
## COURT OF APPEALS

SANDEE BRYAN MARION

CHIEF JUSTICE

KAREN ANGELINI

MARIALYN BARNARD

REBECA C. MARTINEZ

PATRICIA O. ALVAREZ

LUZ ELENA D. CHAPA

IRENE RIOS

JUSTICES FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

CADENA-REEVES JUSTICE CENTER

300 DOLOROSA, SUITE 3200

SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 78205-3037

WWW.TXCOURTS.GOV/4THCOA.ASPX KEITH E. HOTTLE,

CLERK OF COURT

TELEPHONE

(210) 335-2635

FACSIMILE NO.

(210) 335-2762

October 31, 2017

Andrew Warthen

Assistant Criminal District Attorney

101 W. Nueva St.

San Antonio, TX 78205

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL * Kevin Stryker

Attorney at Law

217 Arden Grove St.

San Antonio, TX 78215

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

RE: Court of Appeals Number: 04-17-00319-CR, 04-17-00320-CR

Trial Court Case Number: 2013CR10739W, 2013CR4990

Style: John K. Marlon

v.

The State of Texas

Dear Counsel:

The Court has reviewed the record and briefs in this appeal and has determined that oral

argument will not significantly aid it in determining the legal and factual issues presented in the

appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 39.8. Therefore, all requests for oral argument are denied, and the

cause is advanced for ON BRIEFS submission on December 12, 2017, to the following panel:

Chief Justice Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice Marialyn Barnard, and Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa.

All parties will be notified of the Court’s decision in this appeal in accordance with T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 48.

Either party may file a motion requesting the Court to reconsider its determination that

oral argument will not significantly aid the Court in determining the legal and factual issues

presented in the appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 39.8. Such a motion should be filed within ten (10)

days from the date of this letter.

Very truly yours,

_________________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

cc: Nicholas A. LaHood (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)
#### Alan R. Varley *v.*Nina B. Varley

*Henry D. Marcus,*on the motion.

Argued October 1

decided October 1, 1974

The motion by Henry D. Marcus to withdraw his appearance in behalf of the defendant in the appeal from the Superior Court in Hartford County is granted.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1599 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1599

    Condemning the death threats against Representative Nancy Mace.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 26, 2024

Mrs. Luna submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
    Condemning the death threats against Representative Nancy Mace.

Whereas, on November 18, 2024, Representative Nancy Mace introduced a resolution 
        prohibiting Members, officers, and employees of the House from using 
        single-sex facilities other than those corresponding to their biological 
        sex;
Whereas, after introduction of this resolution, Representative Nancy Mace has 
        received multiple death threats;
Whereas one of the death threats came from a video posted on social media with 
        the statement ``This video goes out to Congresswoman Nancy Mace. 
        Congresswoman Nancy Mace, I hope that one day I do find you in that 
        woman's bathroom and I grab your ratty looking f--ing hair and drag your 
        face down to the floor while I repeatedly bash it in until the blood's 
        everywhere and you're dead.'';
Whereas another death threat came from a phone call with a blocked number where 
        it was stated that ``We're killing her. She'll die today.'';
Whereas another death threat came from a post on social media with the statement 
        ``Prepare to die @repnancymace.'';
Whereas another death threat came from a phone call where it was stated ``Nancy 
        Mace doesn't deserve to be alive.'';
Whereas another death threat came from a phone call where it was stated ``Kill 
        yourself motherf--er.'';
Whereas another death threat came from a phone call where it was stated ``We 
        know where you are, we're going to kill you, Nancy.''; and
Whereas another death threat came from a phone call where it was stated ``I 
        never pray but I'm praying that Nancy Mace gets Stage 4 Ovarian Cancer 
        and her children have to watch her suffer.'': Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) strongly condemns the death threats being sent to 
        Representative Nancy Mace; and
            (2) condemns all threats of violence.
                                 <all>
```
---

---

EXHIBIT 14(a)(4)

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 33-34233, 33-46861, 33-87614,
33-97622, 33-97624, and 33-39364 of Scailex Corporation Ltd. (formerly Scitex Corporation
Ltd.) (Scailex) on Form S-8 of our report on the financial statements of
Scitex Vision America, Inc. (a wholly owned subsidiary of Scailex Vision (Tel-Aviv) Ltd.
(formerly Scitex Vision Ltd.)) dated February 7, 2005, appearing in this Annual Report on
Form 20-F of Scailex for the year ended December 31, 2005.

| |  | /s/ Frazier & Deeter, LLC
 Frazier & Deeter, LLC
| |  | --------------------------------------------------------------

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

June 26, 2006



---

---
#### Catherine Cady, as Administratrix of the Estate of Paul R. Cady, Deceased, Appellant, v. City of New York, Respondent.

Order, entered on March 29, 1963, unanimously reversed on the law, with $20 costs and disbursements to appellant, and the motion granted. In this action damages are sought for personal injuries and wrongful death of a deceased fireman, who had been in the employ of defendant city. 'The latter in its amended answer alleged as a partial affirmative defense and" in mitigation of damages that the widow of decedent was receiving and would receive during her lifetime a stated sum annually in the form of a pension granted by the Pension Fund of the Fire Department of the city. The amount, it was alleged, constitutes one half of the salary of deceased. The fund is composed of moneys received from various sources including contributions made by members of which decedent was one. If the amounts from all other sources are insufficient to pay pensions and benefits the Board of Estimate of the city is mandated to appropriate the deficiency. (Administrative Code of City of New York, § B19-3.0.) We conclude that the pension payments sought to be offset are from a collateral source and proof thereof would not be admissible upon the trial in mitigation of damage. *(Nealy*v. *Rennert,*9 N Y 2d 202, 206; *Lehr*v. *City of New York,*16 A D 2d 702; *United States*v. *Price,*288 F. 2d 448, 450, 451.) Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, McNally, Stevens and Bastow, JJ.
|    |                                                                                                               |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of EXCO Resources, Inc.; and |

|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |
| Date:  | April 30, 2018 | /s/ Tyler Farquharson |
|   |   | Tyler Farquharson |
|   |   | Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |