alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Angelo J. Paliotto, Respondent, v. Town of Islip et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

In an action to enjoin the defendants from taking any steps to consider and adopt a proposed zoning amendment, and for other relief, the defendants, Town of Islip, .its Town Board and its Building and Zoning Inspector appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated January 12, 1962, as granted the plaintiff’s motion for an injunction *pendente lite.*Order,.insofar as appealed from, reversed, without costs, and motion - denied. In our opinion, the notice of public-hearing, dated November 6, • 1961, was not ambiguous. Plaintiff is the owner' of cértain described property which he claims is zoned “Business'” and which the *931defendants maintain is zoned “ Business i District.” There is no dispute as to the' boundaries of plaintiff’s property, the sole issue is whether it is zoned “ Business ” or *“*Business 1 District.” • Under these circumstances, the notice of public hearing, the preamble of which described the proposed change of zone fr,om *“*Business or Business 1 District * ** °*to Business 1 District ”, is not only unambiguous, but represents a clarification of the existing situation. The notice of hearing contains a complete and detailed description of the property which is to be affected by the enactment and it reasonably apprised the plaintiff of the change to be adopted. ' In our opinion, contrary to the finding made at Special Term, the notice was not rendered void and ineffective by reason of any ambiguity. Moreover,' we find that the recommendation of the Planning Board, dated October 27, 1961, constituted a sufficient compliance with the statutory requirements (Town Law, § 274). In view of the fact that, upon the present record, there appears to be no legal impediment barring the defendant Town Board from adopting the proposed enactment, we conclude that it was error to have granted the injunction *pendente lite.*It is well established that the drastic remedy of a temporary injunction is not to be' granted unless a clear right to the relief demanded is established *(Park Terrace Caterers*v. *McDonough,*9 A D 2d 113). (For decision at Special Term, see 31 Misc 2d 447; for related appeal, see *Matter of Paliotto*v. *Dickerson,*22 A D 2d 929.) Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Hill and Rabin, JJ., concur.
### §7216. Violations of contract

#### (a) Termination of contract for violation

Except as provided in subsection (b), if an owner or producer subject to a contract violates a requirement of the contract specified in section 7211(a) of this title, the Secretary shall terminate the contract with respect to the owner or producer on each farm in which the owner or producer has an interest. On the termination, the owner or producer shall forfeit all rights to receive future contract payments on each farm in which the owner or producer has an interest and shall refund to the Secretary all contract payments received by the owner or producer during the period of the violation, together with interest on the contract payments as determined by the Secretary.

#### (b) Refund or adjustment

If the Secretary determines that a violation does not warrant termination of the contract under subsection (a), the Secretary may require the owner or producer subject to the contract—

(1) to refund to the Secretary that part of the contract payments received by the owner or producer during the period of the violation, together with interest on the contract payments as determined by the Secretary; or

(2) to accept a reduction in the amount of future contract payments that is proportionate to the severity of the violation, as determined by the Secretary.

#### (c) Foreclosure

#### (1) Effect of foreclosure

An owner or producer subject to a contract may not be required to make repayments to the Secretary of amounts received under the contract if the contract acreage has been foreclosed on and the Secretary determines that forgiving the repayments is appropriate to provide fair and equitable treatment.

#### (2) Resumption of operation

This subsection shall not void the responsibilities of the owner or producer under the contract if the owner or producer continues or resumes operation, or control, of the contract acreage. On the resumption of operation or control over the contract acreage by the owner or producer, the provisions of the contract in effect on the date of the foreclosure shall apply.

#### (d) Review

A determination of the Secretary under this section shall be considered to be an adverse decision for purposes of the availability of administrative review of the determination.

(Pub. L. 104–127, title I, §116, Apr. 4, 1996, 110 Stat. 903.)
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 08-7714

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

 v. 

JERMAINE CHAPMAN, 

 Defendant - Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Newport News. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr., 

Senior District Judge. (4:07-cr-00022-WDK-JEB-1) 

Submitted: December 16, 2008 Decided: December 24, 2008 

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Jermaine Chapman, Appellant Pro Se. Eric Matthew Hurt, Assistant 

United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

 Jermaine Chapman appeals the district court’s order 

denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006) motion. We have reviewed 

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm 

for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. 

Chapman, No. 4:07-cr-00022-WDK-JEB-1 (E.D. Va. July 23, 2008). 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
#### § 1618.1 Abandonment of rights or privileges.

If a registrant fails to claim and exercise any right or privilege within the required time, he shall be deemed to have abandoned the right or privilege unless the Director of Selective Service, for good cause, waives the time limit.
1209.470 Fact-finding procedures. The provisions of this section constitute the procedures to be used to resolve genuine disputes of material fact pursuant to 1209.406-3 and 1209.407-3. The SDC shall establish the date for the fact-finding hearing, normally to be held within 30 business days after notifying the contractor or individual that the SDO has determined a genuine dispute of material fact(s) exists. ( a ) The Government's representative and the contractor shall each have an opportunity to present evidence relevant to the genuine dispute(s) of material fact identified by the SDO. The contractor or individual may appear in person or through counsel at the fact-finding hearing and should address all defenses, contested facts, admissions, remedial actions taken, and, if a proposal to debar is involved, mitigating and aggravating factors. The contractor or individual may submit documentary evidence, present witnesses, and confront any person the agency presents.
( b ) Witnesses may testify in person. Witnesses will be reminded of the official nature of the proceedings and that any false testimony given is subject to criminal prosecution. Witnesses are subject to cross-examination. The fact-finding proceeding is an informal evidentiary hearing, during which the Rules of Evidence and Civil Procedure do not apply. Hearsay evidence may be presented and will be given appropriate weight by the fact-finder.
( c ) The proceedings shall be transcribed and a copy of the transcript shall be made available at cost to the contractor upon request, unless the contractor and the factfinder, by mutual agreement, waive the requirement for a transcript.
( d ) The fact-finder shall prepare a written finding(s) of fact for the record by a preponderance of the evidence for proposed debarments, and by adequate evidence for suspensions. A copy of the findings of fact shall be provided to the SDO, the Government's representative, and the contractor or individual. The SDO will consider the written findings of fact in the decision regarding the suspension or proposed debarment.
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 216 (Wednesday, November 7, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 66840-66841]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-27203]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS EXAMINATION COUNCIL

[Docket No. AS12-21]

Appraisal Subcommittee Notice of Meeting

AGENCY: Appraisal Subcommittee of the Federal Financial Institutions 
Examination Council.

ACTION: Notice of Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Description: In accordance with Section 1104(b) of Title XI of the 
Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989, 
as amended, notice is hereby given that the Appraisal Subcommittee 
(ASC) will meet in open session for its regular meeting:
    Location: OCC--250 E Street SW., Room 8C, Washington, DC 20219.
    Date: November 14, 2012.
    Time: 10:30 a.m.
    Status: Open.

Matters To Be Considered

Summary Agenda

    October 10, 2012 minutes--Open Session.

(No substantive discussion of the above items is anticipated. These 
matters will be resolved with a single vote unless a member of the 
ASC requests that an item be moved to the discussion agenda.)

Discussion Agenda

    Nevada Compliance Review.

How To Attend and Observe an ASC Meeting

    Email your name, organization and contact information to 
meetings@asc.gov. You may also send a written request via U.S. Mail, 
fax or commercial carrier to the Executive Director of the ASC, 1401 H 
Street NW., Ste. 760, Washington, DC 20005. The

[[Page 66841]]

fax number is 202-289-4101. Your request must be received no later than 
4:30 p.m., ET, on the Monday prior to the meeting. If that Monday is a 
Federal holiday, then your request must be received by 4:30 p.m. ET on 
the previous Friday. Attendees must have a valid government-issued 
photo ID and must agree to submit to reasonable security measures. The 
meeting space is intended to accommodate public attendees. However, if 
the space will not accommodate all requests, the ASC may refuse 
attendance on that reasonable basis. The use of any video or audio tape 
recording device, photographing device, or any other electronic or 
mechanical device designed for similar purposes is prohibited at ASC 
meetings.

    Dated: November 2, 2012.
James R. Park,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 2012-27203 Filed 11-6-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
```
### §1434. Repealed. Pub. L. 95–417, §7, Oct. 5, 1978, 92 Stat. 918

Section, acts June 27, 1952, ch. 477, title III, ch. 2, §323, 66 Stat. 246; Sept. 11, 1957, Pub. L. 85–316, §11, 71 Stat. 642; Aug. 20, 1958, Pub. L. 85–697, §1, 72 Stat. 687, related to citizenship of children adopted by citizens.
FORM 6-K



SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION



Washington, D.C. 20549



Report of Foreign Issuer



Pursuant to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16 of



Securities Exchange Act of 1934



For the month of March 2007



ABBEY NATIONAL PLC

(Translation of registrant's name into English)



Abbey National House, 2 Triton Square, Regents

Place, London NW1 3AN, England

(Address of principal executive offices)





Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports under cover Form 20-F or Form 40-F.



Form 20-F . . . .X. . . . Form 40-F . . . . . . . .



Indicate by check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the information contained in this Form is also thereby furnishing the information to the Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.



Yes . . . . . . . No . . .X. . . .















---







ABBEY NATIONAL PLC

ISIN XS0146845572 (SERIES A)

ISIN XS0146844682 (SERIES B)





Confirmation of Redemption to holders of



USD 50,000,000 Capped Floating Rate Callable Subordinated Notes due 2012

(Series A)



USD 50,000,000 Floating Rate Callable Subordinated Notes due 2012

(Series B)



(Series A and Series B together, the Notes)



Abbey National plc hereby confirms that it has given notice in accordance with the terms of the Notes that on 3 May, 2007 (the Redemption Date) it will redeem all of the outstanding Notes at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount thereof, together with any accrued interest payable thereon to, but excluding, the Redemption Date.



Dated: 28 March, 2007



Contacts



Jo Wainwright (AFM Legal)


+ 44 20 7 756 4723



Jon Burgess (Head of Investor Relations)

+ 44 20 7 756 4182













---















SIGNATURES



Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.







| |                        | ABBEY NATIONAL PLC     
| | ---------------------- | -----------------------
| |                        |                        
| |                        |                        
| |                        |                        
| | Dated: 28th March 2007 | By / s / Katherine Bond
| | (Authorised Signatory) |
U.S. DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

ATTORNEY APPEARANCE FORM

NOTE: In order to appear before this Court an attorney must either be a member in good

standing of this Court¶s general bar or be granted leave to appear pro hac vice as provided for

by Local Rules 83.12 through 83.14.

In the Matter of Case Number:

AN APPEARANCE IS HEREBY FILED BY THE UNDERSIGNED AS ATTORNEY FOR:

NAME (Type or print)

SIGNATURE (Use electronic signature if the appearance form is filed electronically)

 s/

FIRM

STREET ADDRESS

CITY/STATE/ZIP

ID NUMBER (SEE ITEM 3 IN INSTRUCTIONS) TELEPHONE NUMBER

ARE YOU ACTING AS LEAD COUNSEL IN THIS CASE? YES NO 

ARE YOU ACTING AS LOCAL COUNSEL IN THIS CASE? YES NO 

ARE YOU A MEMBER OF THIS COURT¶S TRIAL BAR? YES NO 

IF THIS CASE REACHES TRIAL, WILL YOU ACT AS THE TRIAL ATTORNEY? YES NO 

IF THIS IS A CRIMINAL CASE, CHECK THE BOX BELOW THAT DESCRIBES YOUR STATUS.

RETAINED COUNSEL APPOINTED COUNSEL 

In re Innovatio IP Ventures, LLC, Patent Litigation

1:11-cv-09308

Lowe’s Home Centers, Inc.

Gianni Cutri

Gianni Cutri

Kirkland & Ellis LLP

300 North LaSalle

Chicago, IL 60654

6272109 312.862.2000

✔

✔

✔

✔

Case: 1:11-cv-09308 Document #: 467 Filed: 10/29/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:16728
<PAGE>
 
                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.1
 
                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
 
  We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (No.
333-30783, No. 333-45955) on Form S-8, the Registration Statement (No. 333-
24465, No. 333-07759, No. 333-45981) on Form S-3 and the Registration
Statements (No. 333-35189, No. 333-39711, No. 333-42463, No. 333-52487, No.
333-52717) on Form S-4 of United States Filter Corporation of our report dated
January 16, 1998, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of The Kinetics
Group, Inc. as of September 30, 1997 and 1996, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the
three years in the period ended September 30, 1997, included in the Annual
Report (Form 10-K) of United States Filter Corporation for the year ended
March 31, 1998.
 
                                                              Ernst & Young LLP
 
Walnut Creek, California
June 26, 1998
### §5302. Definitions

As used in this chapter—

(1) the term "comprehensive plan" means the comprehensive plan prepared under section 5313 of this title;

(2) the term "coordinated program" means the National Nutrition Monitoring and Related Research Program established by section 5311(a) of this title;

(3) the terms "Interagency Board for Nutrition Monitoring and Related Research" and "Board" mean the Federal coordinating body established by section 5311(c) of this title;

(4) the term "Joint Implementation Plan for a Comprehensive National Nutrition Monitoring System" means the plan of that title dated August 18, 1981 and submitted by the Department of Agriculture and the Department of Health and Human Services under section 3178 of this title;

(5) the term "local government" means a local general unit of government or local educational unit;

(6) the terms "National Nutrition Monitoring Advisory Council" and "Council" mean the advisory body established under section 5331 of this title;

(7) the term "nutrition monitoring and related research" means the set of activities necessary to provide timely information about the role and status of factors that bear on the contribution that nutrition makes to the health of the people of the United States, including—

(A) dietary, nutritional, and health status measurements;

(B) food consumption measurements;

(C) food composition measurements and nutrient data banks;

(D) dietary knowledge and attitude measurements; and

(E) food supply and demand determinations;

(8) the term "nutritional quality" means—

(A) the appropriate levels of individual nutrients in the diet;

(B) the appropriate levels between nutrients in the diet;

(C) the bioavailability of nutrients such as absorption, digestion, and utilization; and

(D) the nutritional importance of nonnutrient substances such as fiber, phytate, and such substances that are naturally found in the food supply; and

(9) the term "Secretaries" means the Secretary of Agriculture and the Secretary of Health and Human Services, acting jointly.

(Pub. L. 101–445, §3, Oct. 22, 1990, 104 Stat. 1035.)
#### John Thomas *v.*Abraham Katz

*Robert K. Lesser,*for the appellee (plaintiff).

*Edward R. Garley,*for the appellant (defendant).

Argued January 7

decided January 7, 1975

The plaintiff’s motion to dismiss the appeal from the Court of Common Pleas in Fairfield County is denied.
### §97. Purchase and analysis by Secretary of samples of spirits of turpentine to detect violations; reports to Department of Justice; publication of results of analysis, etc.

The Secretary of Agriculture is hereby authorized to purchase from time to time in open market samples of spirits of turpentine and of anything offered for sale as such for the purpose of analysis, classification, or grading and of detecting any violation of this chapter. He shall report to the Department of Justice for appropriate action any violation of this chapter coming to his knowledge. He is also authorized to publish from time to time results of any analysis, classification, or grading of spirits of turpentine and of anything offered for sale as such made by him under any provision of this chapter.

(Mar. 3, 1923, ch. 217, §7, 42 Stat. 1436.)
<PAGE>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 15








TXU Gas Company:

We have made a review, in accordance with standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants, of the unaudited condensed
consolidated interim financial information of TXU Gas Company and subsidiaries
(TXU Gas) for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2003
and 2002, as indicated in our report dated November 11, 2003; because we did not
perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on that information.

We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included in TXU Gas'
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2003, is
incorporated by reference in Registration Statements Nos. 333-85769,
333-85769-01, 333-85769-02 and 333-85769-03 on Form S-3.

We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under
the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration
Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or
certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.



DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP


Dallas, Texas
November 11, 2003
UNITED STATE

TED. TAS COURT OF APPEALS TOR THES NENTH CIRCUIT

4 Document C8iSi Pages: 1

Office of the Clerk
Phone: (312) 435-5850
www.ca7uscourts. gov

Everett McKinley Dirksen United States Courthouse
Roomn 2722-219 S, Dearborn Street
Chicago, Mlinois 60604

August 15, 2012

ORDER F I L E D

Before AUG 15 2012

MICHAEL S. KANNE, Circuit Judge

ANTHONY OLIVE,
Plaintiff - Appellant

No. 12-1944 ve

WEXFORD HUALTH SOURCES, INCORPORATED, et al.,
Defendants - Appellees

Originating Case Information:

District Court No: 3:12-cv-50065
hern District of Illinois, Western Division
ict Judge Philip G. Reinhard

The following are before the court:

1. MOTION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL IN FORMA PAUPERIS, filed on
July 30, 2012, by the pro se appellant.

N

MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF PLRA MOTION FOR LEAVE TO
PROCEED ON APPEAL IN FORMA PAUPERIS, filed on July 30, 2012, by
the pro se appellant.

Upon consideration of the request for leave to proceed as a pauper on appeal, the
appellant's motion filed under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 24, and the district
court's order pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) certifying that the appeal was filed in bad
faith, this court has determined that the district court erred in its bad-faith determination.
See we v. Clinton, 209 1.3d 1025 (7th Cir. 2000). Accordingly,

I'T 1S ORDERED that the motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis is
GRANTED. ‘The district court is instructed to assess an initial partial filing fee for the
appeal and to notify this court when the partial fee has been collected,

form name: ¢7_Order_3}(form 11): 177)

THOMAS G. BRUTON
CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT