IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1499 

Expressing concern about the spreading problem of book banning and the 

proliferation of threats to freedom of expression in the United States. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 24, 2024 

Mr. RASKIN (for himself, Mr. ALLRED, Mrs. BEATTY, Ms. BONAMICI, Ms. 

BROWNLEY, Ms. BROWN, Mr. CASE, Mr. CASTEN, Mr. CASTRO of Texas, 

Mrs. CHERFILUS-MCCORMICK, Ms. CHU, Mr. CLEAVER, Mr. COSTA, Mr. 

DOGGETT, Ms. ESCOBAR, Mrs. FLETCHER, Ms. LOIS FRANKEL of Florida, Mrs. HAYES, Mr. FROST, Mr. GRIJALVA, Mr. HUFFMAN, Mr. IVEY, 

Mr. JOHNSON of Georgia, Ms. LEE of Pennsylvania, Ms. LEE of California, Ms. LEGER FERNANDEZ, Mr. LIEU, Mr. MCGOVERN, Ms. MENG, 

Ms. NORTON, Mr. PETERS, Ms. PINGREE, Mr. POCAN, Ms. PORTER, Mrs. 

RAMIREZ, Mr. RUIZ, Ms. SALINAS, Ms. SCANLON, Ms. SCHAKOWSKY, Mr. 

DAVID SCOTT of Georgia, Mr. SOTO, Mr. THANEDAR, Ms. TLAIB, and 

Ms. WILLIAMS of Georgia) submitted the following resolution; which was 

referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently 

determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing concern about the spreading problem of book 

banning and the proliferation of threats to freedom of 

expression in the United States. 

Whereas the overwhelming majority of adults in the United 

States oppose book bans; 

Whereas an overwhelming majority of adults in the United 

States support educators teaching about the civil rights 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1499 IH 

movement, the history and experiences of Native Americans, enslaved Africans, immigrants facing discrimination, and the ongoing effects of racism; 

Whereas an overwhelming majority of adults are confident 

that their community’s public schools select appropriate 

books for students to read; 

Whereas, in 1969, the Supreme Court of the United States 

held in Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community 

School District, 393 U.S. 503 (1969), that students do 

not ‘‘shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech 

or expression at the schoolhouse gate’’; 

Whereas, in 1982, a plurality of the Supreme Court of the 

United States wrote in Board of Education, Island Trees 

Union Free School District No. 26 v. Pico, 457 U.S. 853 

(1982), that schools may not remove library books ‘‘in a 

narrowly partisan or political manner’’, as this kind of 

censorship will result in ‘‘official suppression of ideas’’; 

Whereas the First Amendment to the Constitution of the 

United States protects freedom of speech and the freedom to read and write; 

Whereas Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human 

Rights states that ‘‘everyone has the right to freedom of 

opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to 

hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive 

and impart information and ideas through any media and 

regardless of frontiers’’; 

Whereas PEN America identified over 10,000 instances of individual books banned between July 2023 and June 

2024, which is over double the instances of recorded book 

bans in public schools between July 2022 and June 2023 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 1499 IH 

when PEN America counted nearly 3,400 instances of individual books banned; 

Whereas PEN America identified 5,894 instances of books 

banned between July 2021 and June 2023, affecting 

2,823 unique titles and censoring the works of 2,598 authors, illustrators, and translators; 

Whereas the overwhelming majority of recent book bans were 

enacted without following the best practice guidelines for 

book challenges outlined by the American Library Association, the National Coalition Against Censorship, and 

the National Council of Teachers of English; 

Whereas the unimpeded sharing of ideas and the freedom to 

read are essential to a strong democracy; 

Whereas books do not require readers to agree with topics, 

themes, or viewpoints but instead allow readers to explore 

and engage with differing perspectives to form and inform their own views; 

Whereas suppressing the freedom to read and denying access 

to literature, history, and knowledge are repressive and 

antidemocratic tactics used by authoritarian regimes 

against their people; 

Whereas book bans violate the rights of students, families, 

residents, and citizens based on the political, ideological, 

and cultural preferences of the specific individuals imposing the bans; 

Whereas book bans have multifaceted, harmful consequences 

on— 

(1) students, who have a right to access a diverse 

range of stories and perspectives, especially students 

from historically marginalized backgrounds whose communities are often targeted by thought control measures; 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
4 

•HRES 1499 IH 

(2) educators and librarians, who are operating in 

some States in an increasingly punitive and surveillanceoriented environment and are experiencing a chilling effect in their work; 

(3) authors whose works are targeted and suppressed; 

(4) parents who want their children to attend public 

schools that remain open to curiosity, discovery, and the 

freedom to read; and 

(5) community members who want free access to a 

range of uncensored information and knowledge from 

their public libraries; 

Whereas classic and award-winning literature and books that 

have been part of school curricula for decades have been 

challenged, removed from libraries pending review, or 

outright banned from schools, including— 

(1) ‘‘Brave New World’’ by Aldous Huxley; 

(2) ‘‘The Handmaid’s Tale’’ by Margaret Atwood; 

(3) ‘‘Anne Frank’s Diary: The Graphic Adaptation’’ 

adapted by Ari Folman; 

(4) ‘‘Their Eyes Were Watching God’’ by Zora Neal 

Hurston; and 

(5) ‘‘To Kill a Mockingbird’’ by Harper Lee; 

Whereas books, particularly those written by and about outsiders, newcomers, and individuals from marginalized 

backgrounds, are facing a heightened risk of being 

banned; 

Whereas a substantial number of the instances of books 

banned or otherwise restricted in the United States have 

LGBTQ+ characters or themes that recognize the equal 

humanity and dignity of all individuals despite differences, including— 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
5 

•HRES 1499 IH 

(1) ‘‘And Tango Makes Three’’ by Justin Richardson and Peter Parnell; and 

(2) ‘‘This Book Is Gay’’ by Juno Dawson; 

Whereas a significant proportion of the instances of books, 

both fiction and nonfiction, that have been banned or 

otherwise restricted in the United States are books about 

race, racism, or feature characters of color, including— 

(1) ‘‘The Story of Ruby Bridges’’ by Robert Coles 

and illustrated by George Ford; 

(2) ‘‘Letter from Birmingham Jail’’ by Martin Luther King, Jr.; 

(3) ‘‘Thank You, Jackie Robinson’’ by Barbara 

Cohen; 

(4) ‘‘Malala: A Hero For All’’ by Shana Corey; 

(5) ‘‘Fry Bread: A Native American Family Story’’ 

by Kevin Noble Maillard; 

(6) ‘‘Hair Love’’ by Matthew A. Cherry; 

(7) ‘‘Good Trouble: Lessons From the Civil Rights 

Playbook’’ by Christopher Noxon; and 

(8) ‘‘We Are All Born Free: The Universal Declaration of Human Rights in Pictures’’; 

Whereas the Comic Book Legal Defense Fund has reported 

a dramatic surge in challenges at libraries and schools to 

the inclusion of graphic novels that depict the diversity 

of civic life in the United States and the painful and 

complex history of the human experience, including— 

(1) ‘‘New Kid’’ by Jerry Craft; 

(2) ‘‘Drama’’ by Raina Telgemeier; 

(3) ‘‘American Born Chinese’’ by Gene Luen Yang; 

and 

(4) ‘‘Maus’’ by Art Spiegelman; 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
6 

•HRES 1499 IH 

Whereas books addressing death, grief, mental illness, and 

suicide are targeted alongside nonfiction books that discuss feelings and emotions written for teenage and young 

adult audiences that frequently confront these topics; 

Whereas, during congressional hearings on April 7, 2022, 

May 19, 2022, September 12, 2023, and October 19, 

2023, students, parents, teachers, librarians, and school 

administrators testified to the chilling and fear-spreading 

effects that book bans have on education and the school 

environment; and 

Whereas, according to PEN America, from July 2021 to 

June 2023, over 40 States across the country limited access to certain books for limited or indefinite periods of 

time, including— 

(1) Florida, where at least 1,972 books in total have 

been banned or restricted in 37 school districts; 

(2) Texas, where at least 1,426 books in total have 

been banned or restricted in 28 school districts; 

(3) Pennsylvania, where at least 644 books in total 

have been banned or restricted in 16 school districts; 

(4) Missouri, where at least 360 books in total have 

been banned or restricted in 16 school districts; 

(5) Tennessee, where at least 360 books in total 

have been banned or restricted in 9 school districts; 

(6) Utah, where at least 293 books in total have 

been banned or restricted in 10 school districts; 

(7) South Carolina, where at least 128 books in total 

have been banned or restricted in 7 school districts; 

(8) Virginia, where at least 94 books in total have 

been banned or restricted in at least 6 school districts; 

(9) Michigan, where at least 80 books in total have 

been banned or restricted in at least 6 school districts; 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
7 

•HRES 1499 IH 

(10) North Carolina, where at least 74 books in 

total have been banned or restricted in at least 5 school 

districts; 

(11) Wisconsin, where at least 72 books in total 

have been banned or restricted in at least 12 school districts; 

(12) Idaho where at least 51 books in total have 

been banned or restricted in at least 1 school district; 

and 

(13) Oklahoma, where at least 45 books in total 

have been banned or restricted in at least 3 school districts: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) expresses concern about the spreading prob3 lem of book banning and the proliferating threats to 

4 freedom of expression in the United States; 

5 (2) reaffirms the commitment of the United 

6 States to supporting the freedom of expression of 

7 writers that is protected under the First Amendment 

8 to the Constitution and the freedom of all individ9 uals in the United States to read books without gov10 ernment censorship; 

11 (3) calls on local governments and school dis12 tricts to follow best practice guidelines when ad13 dressing challenges to books; and 

14 (4) calls on local governments and school dis15 tricts to protect the rights of students to learn and 

16 the ability of educators and librarians to teach, inVerDate Sep 11 2014 18:10 Sep 25, 2024 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\HR1499.IH HR1499

ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
8 

•HRES 1499 IH 

1 cluding by providing students with the opportunity 

2 to read a wide array of books reflecting the full 

3 breadth and diversity of viewpoints and perspectives. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS