alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §939. Loan terms and conditions

Loans made from or insured through the fund shall be for the same purposes and on the same terms and conditions as are provided for loans in subchapters I and II of this chapter except as otherwise provided in sections 933 to 938 inclusive.

(May 20, 1936, ch. 432, title III, §309, as added Pub. L. 93–32, §2, May 11, 1973, 87 Stat. 70; amended Pub. L. 101–624, title XXIII, §2360, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 4042; Pub. L. 103–129, §2(b)(2), Nov. 1, 1993, 107 Stat. 1363; Pub. L. 104–127, title VII, §779, Apr. 4, 1996, 110 Stat. 1151; Pub. L. 115–334, title VI, §6602(b)(11), Dec. 20, 2018, 132 Stat. 4777.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–334 struck out at end "The preceding sentence shall not be construed to make section 948(b)(2) or 950b of this title applicable to this subchapter."

1996—Pub. L. 104–127 struck out subsec. (a) designation and heading "In general" and heading and text of subsec. (b). Prior to amendment, text read as follows: "The term of any telephone loan made under this subchapter shall be determined by the borrower at the time the loan application is submitted."

1993—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 103–129 inserted at end "The preceding sentence shall not be construed to make section 948(b)(2) or 950b of this title applicable to this subchapter."

1990—Pub. L. 101–624 designated existing provisions as subsec. (a) and added subsec. (b).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective May 11, 1973, see section 12 of Pub. L. 93–32, set out as a note under section 930 of this title.
# MEMORANDUM

**UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL**

**TO:**The Deputy Inspector General

**FROM:**The Inspector General

**SUBJECT:**Redelegation of Authority for Freedom of Information Act Administrative Appeals, on an as needed basis.

## I. DELEGATION

Under the authority vested in me by delegation EAIEF/ 193 from the Secretary, certified on May l 0, 201 1, I hereby delegate to you the authority to issue decisions on administrative appeals of denials of req uests for records maintained in the Office of

Inspector General under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), on an as needed basis, to the extent that such decisions are consistent with the FOIA, Departmental regulation s, and Executive Orders. More specifically, this authority will apply to those administrative appeals for which the Inspector General determines there is a potential appearance of a conflict of interest, or an actual conflict of interest, in having the Inspector General issue the appeal determination.

## II. RESERVATIONS

Unless otherwise noted in existing or future delegations of authority, the following are not delegated:

A. Authority to waive or reduce all or part of any fee is reserved to the Headquarters Designated Denial Officer; and

B. Authority to submit reports to Congress or the President unless otherwise provided by law is reserved to the Secretary.

## III. REDELEGATION

No further redelegation is authorized.

## IV. CERTIFICATION AND EFFECTIVE DATE

This delegation is effective upon certification by the Department's Principal Delegations Control Officer. I hereby ratify actions within the scope of this delegation taken by the addressee prior to the date of certification.

_________/s/______________

Kathleen S. Tighe Inspector General

OGC Clearance Date: 6/29/16/Debbie Friendly

Date Certified: 7/6/16

Departmental Delegations Control Officer: Jim Clemmens

Control Number EF/EF/198
#### 12.300 Scope of subpart.

This subpart establishes provisions and clauses to be used when acquiring commercial products and commercial services.

[60 FR 48241, Sept. 18, 1995, as amended at 86 FR 61023, Nov. 4, 2021]
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL 

OF TEXAS 

AIJSJTIN. TIIXAS 78711 

August 22, 1975 

The Honorable Tim Curry 

Criminal District Attorney 

Tarrant County Courthouse 

Fort Worth, Texas 76102 

Opinion No. H- 672 

Re: Whether juvenile probation 

officers are covered by the County 

Civil Service Act. 

Dear Mr. Curry: 

You have requested our opinion concerning whether juvenile probation 

officers are “employees” within the operation of the County Civil Service Act, 

article 2372h-6, V. T. C. S. 

In Attorney General Opinion H-619 (1975) we found that adult probation 

officers were not subject to the County Civil Service Act, since we believed the 

control exercised by district judges over adult probation was inconsistent with 

the authority of the Civil Service Commission concerning employees subject to 

the Act. We believe the rationale of H-619 is applicable to your question and that 

the juvenile probation officers of Tarrant County are not subject to the County 

Civil Service Act. 

Article 5139, V. T. C. S., provides that the district judges and county 

judge shall constitute the Juvenile Board of counties having a population of 100, 000 

or over. Since article 5142c-2 requires the chief juvenile probation officer to be 

appointed by the Board, and assistants to be appointed subject to the Board’s 

approval, in our view the various judges exercise a degree of control over juvenile 

probation officers which would be inconsistent with the powers of a County Civil 

Service Commission. See Attorney General Opinion H-619. 

- 

SUMMARY 

Juvenile probation officers of Tarrant 

County are not subject to the County Civil 

Service Act. 

/3Cery truly yours: 

Attorney General of Texas 

p. 2928 
The Honorable Tim Curry - Page 2 (H-672) 

Opinion Committee 

jad: 

p. 2929
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF


THE
SARBANES - OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Composite Technology Corporation (the "Company") Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Benton
H Wilcoxon, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to


Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/
      Benton H WilcoxonBenton
      H WilcoxonChief
      Executive Officer(Principal
      Executive Officer)





Date:
 December 14, 2009
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,568,662
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      2,317
<COMMON>                                     6,564,330
<OTHER-SE>                                 (9,135,309)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00


</TABLE>
§ 757.2 Statutory authority. ( a ) *General.* All affirmative claims for damage to or loss of Government property in favor of the United States are processed in accordance with the Federal Collections Claims Act (31 U.S.C. 3711), as amended by the Debt Collection Act of 1982, PL 97-365, 96 Stat. 1749 (25 October 1982), PL 101-552, 104 Stat. 2736 (15 November 1990) and the Debt Collection Improvement Act of 1996, PL 104-134, 110 Stat. 1321, 1358 (26 April 1996). Department of Defense Directive designees, the authority granted to the Secretary of Defense under the Federal Claims Collection Act.
( b ) *Statute of limitations.* Subject to specific provisions in other statutes, there is a general 3-year statute of limitations on affirmative Government tort claims pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2415(b).
[72 FR 53427, Sept. 19, 2007]
#### 1332.114 Unusual contract financing.

The designee authorized to approve unusual contract financing arrangements is set forth in CAM 1301.70.
#### In the Matter of the Estate of Thomas F. Monahan, Deceased. Peter W. Quinn, Appellant; Harry G. Fletcher, Jr., et al., as Executors of Thomas F. Fletcher, Jr., Deceased, et al., Respondents.

In a proceeding by Peter W. Quinn, an attorney at law (as an alleged creditor of the intestate, Thomas F. Monahan, deceased), for his appointment as administrator *de bonis non*of the estate, in which the executors of the intestate’s deceased sole distributee, claiming a prior right to such appointment (Surrogate’s Ct. Act, § 118, subd. 6), filed a cross petition for such appointment, the said Peter W. Quinn appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of a decree of the Surrogate’s Court, Westchester County, rendered June 21, *1963*after a nonjury trial upon the opinion-decision of the Surrogate, dismissing his petition and granting the executor’s cross petition, as denied his “ request,” made by him in a supplemental affidavit filed in the proceeding, that the Surrogate strike out certain “personal references and allegations” concerning the petitioner contained in an affidavit submitted in behalf of the executors in opposition to his petition. The petitioner contends that since, under the statute (Surrogate’s Ct. Act, § 118), appointment of the executors as administrators *de bonis non*was mandatory, such personal references and allegations are “ scandalous, unnecessary, irrelevant and impertinent” and should be expunged. Decree, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, with costs to the respondents (other than the Public Administrator of Westchester County) payable out of the estate. Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Brennan and Hill, JJ., concur.
#### Sandria Glascow et al., Respondents, v Costco Wholesale Corporation, Appellant.

[832 NYS2d 433]

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Edgar G. Walker, J.), entered on or about May 9, 2006, which denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Defendant’s moving papers failed to establish as a matter of law that the water depicted in the photograph, showing track marks, had not been on the floor of its premises for a sufficient length of time for its employees to have discovered and remedied it *(see Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Ctr.,*64 NY2d 851, 853 [1985]; *Gordon v American Museum of Natural History,*67 NY2d 836, 837 [1986]). Concur—Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Friedman, Williams and Sweeny, JJ.
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Joyce Janette Riddle, * From the 42nd District

Court of Taylor County,

 Trial Court No. 48,519-A.

Vs. No. 11-14-00146-CV * October 1, 2015

City of Abilene, * Opinion by Willson, J.

 (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

 Willson, J., and Bailey, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there 

is no error in the order below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s 

opinion, the order of the trial court is in all things affirmed. The costs incurred 

by reason of this appeal are taxed against Joyce Janette Riddle.
### §450f. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 450f was editorially reclassified as section 2204–4 of this title.
#### The People of the State of New York, Plaintiff, v. Rudolph Hahn, Defendant. The People of the State of New York, Plaintiff, v. Rudolph Hahn and David Hulsberg, Defendants.

Motions to dismiss indictment denied.
(1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of R.H. Donnelley
Corporation as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.
 /s/ David C. Swanson
    
    
    
    /s/ Steven M. BlondyDavid C. Swanson
    
    
    
    Steven M. BlondyChairman and Chief Executive Officer
    
    
    

    Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial OfficerOctober 29, 2008
    
    
    
    October 29, 2008
Certification
 Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes  Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Emerson Radio Corp.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and
the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
   Date: November 14, 2008
    
    /s/ Greenfield Pitts

Greenfield PittsChief Financial Officer
  24
#### 1301.101 Purpose.

The CAR establishes uniform acquisition policies and procedures that implement and supplement the FAR. If there is a discrepancy between the CAR and FAR, the FAR will take precedence.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT - CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER





18 U.S.C. 1350 Certification of Donny R. Johnson


Executive Vice President - Chief Financial Officer


of


Duckwall-ALCO Stores, Inc.





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Duckwall-ALCO Stores, Inc., a Kansas corporation (the “Company”), for the quarter ended May 2, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned officer of the Company certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge:




(a)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and;




(b)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Duckwall-ALCO Stores, Inc. and will be retained by Duckwall-ALCO Stores, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





Date:  June 10, 2010




By:       /s/ Donny R. Johnson
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               Feb-28-1998    
<PERIOD-END>                    Nov-29-1997 
<CASH>                              384,000
<SECURITIES>                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                    15,125,000
<ALLOWANCES>                              0
<INVENTORY>                      39,640,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                 61,205,000
<PP&E>                           11,566,000
<DEPRECIATION>                    7,948,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                   70,167,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>            52,330,000
<BONDS>                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                               0
<COMMON>                          1,267,000
<OTHER-SE>                       17,006,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>     70,167,000
<SALES>                          40,935,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                 51,595,000
<CGS>                            24,927,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                    32,869,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                    472,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                1,246,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 (3,222,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             (3,222,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                    (3,222,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                           .65
<EPS-DILUTED>                           .65
        


</TABLE>
H. Res. 1585 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

November 20, 2024. 

Resolved, That the following named Member be, and is 

hereby, elected to the following standing committee of the 

House of Representatives: 

COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY: Ms. Lee Carter of 

Texas. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
### §7461. Findings and purposes

#### (a) Findings

Congress finds that—

(1) domestically produced kiwifruit are grown by many individual producers;

(2) virtually all domestically produced kiwifruit are grown in the State of California, although there is potential for production in many other areas of the United States;

(3) kiwifruit move in interstate and foreign commerce, and kiwifruit that do not move in channels of commerce directly burden or affect interstate commerce;

(4) in recent years, large quantities of kiwifruit have been imported into the United States;

(5) the maintenance and expansion of existing domestic and foreign markets for kiwifruit, and the development of additional and improved markets for kiwifruit, are vital to the welfare of kiwifruit producers and other persons concerned with producing, marketing, and processing kiwifruit;

(6) a coordinated program of research, promotion, and consumer information regarding kiwifruit is necessary for the maintenance and development of the markets; and

(7) kiwifruit producers, handlers, and importers are unable to implement and finance such a program without cooperative action.

#### (b) Purposes

The purposes of this subchapter are—

(1) to authorize the establishment of an orderly procedure for the development and financing (through an assessment) of an effective and coordinated program of research, promotion, and consumer information regarding kiwifruit;

(2) to use the program to strengthen the position of the kiwifruit industry in domestic and foreign markets and maintain, develop, and expand markets for kiwifruit; and

(3) to treat domestically produced kiwifruit and imported kiwifruit equitably.

(Pub. L. 104–127, title V, §552, Apr. 4, 1996, 110 Stat. 1064.)
No. 8236.

#### Cox *v.*City of Lancaster.

(Decided February 2, 1904.)

Error to Circuit Court of Fairfield county.

*Mr. O. D. Martin*and *Mr. M. A. Daugherty,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. A. W. MitJvoff,*city solicitor, and *Mr. G. E. Martin,*for defendant in error. -

Judgment affirmed.

Spear, Shauck and Price, JJ., concur.
### §8305. Interstate movement

The Secretary may prohibit or restrict—

(1) the movement in interstate commerce of any animal, article, or means of conveyance if the Secretary determines that the prohibition or restriction is necessary to prevent the introduction or dissemination of any pest or disease of livestock; and

(2) the use of any means of conveyance or facility in connection with the movement in interstate commerce of any animal or article if the Secretary determines that the prohibition or restriction is necessary to prevent the introduction or dissemination of any pest or disease of livestock.

(Pub. L. 107–171, title X, §10406, May 13, 2002, 116 Stat. 498.)
#### 1336.609-1 Design within funding limitations.

The designee authorized to make the determination described at FAR 36.609-1(c)(1) to enable exclusion of the clause at FAR 52.236-22 from the contract is set forth in CAM 1301.70.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES--OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Weatherford International,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2002 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Bernard J. Duroc-Danner, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes--Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Bernard J. Duroc-Danner
---------------------------------------
Name:  Bernard J. Duroc-Danner
Title: Chief Executive Officer, Chairman of the
       Board and Director
Date:  November 11, 2002
-TM E SI=>IP5r rO F AJ_iA,S KA 

### '^HTMEM TO F iSPORIAiiO N •TOPERATiCN S

• R0 i O 

### 5 8 February9 , 201 2 Docket s - Docket s OS T96-196 0 U.S . Departmen t o fTransportatio n 40 0 Seventh Street , S.W . Roo m P L40 1 Washington , D.C . 205 9 RE : Peninsul a Airway s d/b/a PenAi roperate d i n partnershi p wit h Islan d Ai r- Famil y Assistanc e Progra m PenAi roperate s i n partnershi p wit h Islan d Air . Thes e operation s ar e conducte d unde ra we t leas e agreemen t wit h Islan d Air , an d wil l b e covere d unde rIslan d Air' s Famil yAssistanc e Plan . Th e Islan d Air' s Famil yAssistanc e Pla n o n fil e wit h you rofflce , detail s coverag e a s require d b y th e amende d Aviatio n Disaste rFamil yAssistanc e Ac t o f199 6 (4 9 U.S.C . 113 6 an d 41113) , alon g wit h requiremen t specifie d i n Visio n 100 . Islan d Ai rha s entere d int o contrac t wit h FEI , fo r provisio n o faviatio n disaste rrespons e an d famil yassistanc e services . I n th e even t o fa n aviatb n acciden t o rincident , FE I wil l provid e th e followin g service s o n behal fo fIslan d Air :

•Nex t o fKi n Notificatio n Th e Islan d Ai rEmergenc yRespons e pla n outline s responsibilitie s i n addressin g th e airlin e victi m support task s withi n th e Aviatio n Disaste rFamil yAssistanc e Pla n i n greate rdetail . Shoul d yo u hav e questions , pleas e fee l fre e t o contac t m e at l ^orvi a emai l a t Sincerely , Bria n WhikJe n Vic e President , Safet y/ Complianc e

peninsul a airway s inc . | 610 0 boein g avenu e | anchorag e alaska 9950 2