alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.2


 


Summary of Amendments to
Employment Agreements


 


On March 31, 2006, Cinergy Corp. eliminated the requirement that,
with limited exception, its executive officers and directors retain shares of
stock acquired pursuant to the exercise of stock options until 90 days after
their termination from employment or other service with Cinergy.  The elimination of this requirement was
effective April 3, 2006, and results in the elimination of Section 4g
from the employment agreements of Messrs. James E. Rogers, Michael J.
Cyrus, James L. Turner and Marc E. Manly and Ms. Lynn J. Good.  Prior to its elimination, Section 4g of
the employment agreement of each individual listed above provided as follows:


 


The Executive acknowledges and agrees
that [he/she] shall not sell or otherwise dispose of any shares of Company
stock acquired pursuant to the exercise of a stock option, other than shares
sold in order to pay an option exercise price or the related tax withholding
obligation, until 90 days after the Date of Termination.  Notwithstanding the foregoing, Cinergy, in
its sole discretion, may waive the restrictions contained in the previous
sentence.
### §342. Cooperative agricultural extension work; cooperation with Secretary of Agriculture

Cooperative agricultural extension work shall consist of the development of practical applications of research knowledge and giving of instruction and practical demonstrations of existing or improved practices or technologies in agriculture, uses of solar energy with respect to agriculture, home economics, and rural energy and subjects relating thereto to persons not attending or resident in said colleges in the several communities, and imparting information on said subjects through demonstrations, publications, and otherwise and for the necessary printing and distribution of information in connection with the foregoing; and this work shall be carried on in such manner as may be mutually agreed upon by the Secretary of Agriculture and the State agricultural college or colleges or Territory or possession receiving the benefits of this subchapter.

(May 8, 1914, ch. 79, §2, 38 Stat. 373; June 26, 1953, ch. 157, §1, 67 Stat. 84; Pub. L. 87–749, §1(a), Oct. 5, 1962, 76 Stat. 745; Pub. L. 95–113, title XIV, §1447(3), Sept. 29, 1977, 91 Stat. 1011; Pub. L. 96–294, title II, §256(2), June 30, 1980, 94 Stat. 708; Pub. L. 99–198, title XIV, §1435(a), Dec. 23, 1985, 99 Stat. 1557.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Another section 1447 of Pub. L. 95–113 is classified to section 3222b of this title.

#### Amendments

1985—Pub. L. 99–198 substituted "shall consist of the development of practical applications of research knowledge and giving of instruction and practical demonstrations of existing or improved practices or technologies" for "shall consist of the giving of instructions and practical demonstrations".

1980—Pub. L. 96–294 inserted reference to rural energy.

1977—Pub. L. 95–113 inserted reference to uses of solar energy with respect to agriculture.

1962—Pub. L. 87–749 inserted "or Territory or possession" after "college or colleges".

1953—Act June 26, 1953, inserted "and subjects relating thereto" after "agriculture and home economics" near beginning of section, and inserted reference to necessary printing and distribution of information.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1985 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 99–198 effective Oct. 1, 1985, see section 1435(d) of Pub. L. 99–198, set out as a note under section 343 of this title.

#### Effective Date of 1977 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 95–113 effective Oct. 1, 1977, see section 1901 of Pub. L. 95–113, set out as a note under section 1307 of this title.
#### Thomas M. Prytherch, Appellant-Respondent, v. Juanita M. Prytherch, Respondent-Appellant.

In an action by a husband for a divorce or separation, in which, *inter alia,*the wife counterclaimed for a separation, and in which prior orders (dated April 26, 1963 and May 9, 1963) directed the husband to pay $175 a week temporary alimony for the wife’s support (conditioned upon her “continuing to reside at the marital home”), the parties cross-appeal as follows from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau *681County, dated December 18, 1963, which: (1) on the husband’s motion, reduced to $125 a week the amount of such alimony, commencing as of June 15, 1963; and (2) on the wife’s motion: (a) directed entry of a judgment for $1,325 in her favor against the husband for arrears in the payment of such alimony during the period May 20, 1963 to July 22, 1963, but denied her application to adjudge the husband in contempt for his failure to comply with the said temporary alimony orders during such period; and (b) directed (conditionally) that an order of commitment issue against the husband for his failure to comply with a prior contempt order, dated June 28, 1963: (1) The plaintiff husband appeals from the order of December 18, 1963 in its entirety. (2) The defendant wife appeals from so much of said order as: (a) reduced the amount of the temporary alimony; (b) limited to $1,325 the amount of the judgment for arrears; and (e) denied her application to adjudge the husband in contempt for his failure to comply with the said temporary alimony orders during the period subsequent to May 20, 1963. Order of December 18, 1963, insofar as appealed from by the respective parties, affirmed, without costs. No opinion. [For prior appeal, see 20 A D 2d 721.] Ughetta, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld, Hill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 9 (Thursday, January 14, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 3232]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-00590]



[[Page 3232]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Office of Foreign Assets Control


Notice of OFAC Sanctions Action

AGENCY:  Office of Foreign Assets Control, Treasury.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets 
Control (OFAC) is publishing the names of one or more persons that have 
been placed on OFAC's Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked 
Persons List based on OFAC's determination that one or more applicable 
legal criteria were satisfied. All property and interests in property 
subject to U.S. jurisdiction of this person are blocked, and U.S. 
persons are generally prohibited from engaging in transactions with 
them.

DATES: See SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for applicable date(s).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  OFAC: Associate Director for Global 
Targeting, tel.: 202-622-2420; Assistant Director for Sanctions 
Compliance & Evaluation, tel.: 202-622-2490; Assistant Director for 
Licensing, tel.: 202-622-2480.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Electronic Availability

    The Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List and 
additional information concerning OFAC sanctions programs are available 
on OFAC's website (www.treas.gov/ofac).

Notice of OFAC Action(s)

    On January 8, 2021, OFAC determined that the property and interests 
in property subject to U.S. jurisdiction of the following person are 
blocked under the relevant sanctions authority listed below.

Individual

    1. AL-FAYYADH, Falih (a.k.a. AL FAYYADH, Falih Faisal Fahad; 
a.k.a. ALFAYYADH, Faleh; a.k.a. ALFAYYADH, Falih), Iraq; DOB 27 Mar 
1956; POB Iraq; nationality Iraq; Gender Male; Passport D1019262 
(Iraq) expires 14 Jul 2026 (individual) [GLOMAG].
    Designated pursuant to section 1(a)(ii)(C)(1) of Executive Order 
13818 of December 20, 2017, ``Blocking the Property of Persons 
Involved in Serious Human Rights Abuse or Corruption,'' 82 FR 60839, 
3 CFR, 2018 Comp., p. 399, (E.O. 13818) for being a foreign person 
who is or has been a leader or official of an entity, including any 
government entity, that has engaged in, or whose members have 
engaged in, serious human rights abuse relating to the leader's or 
official's tenure.

    Dated: January 8, 2021.
Andrea M. Gacki,
Director, Office of Foreign Assets Control, U.S. Department of the 
Treasury.
[FR Doc. 2021-00590 Filed 1-13-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-AL-P
#### BRENDEL, Respondent, v. BURGWARDT, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

November 17, 1903.)

Action by George J. Brendel against Fred C. Burgwardt.

No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs.
#### Cosmo Tino et al., v. Patrick R. Flynn et al.

Motion for a stay granted on condition that the appellants procure the record on appeal and appellants’ points to be served and filed on or before February 16, 1961, with notice of argument for February 28, 1961, said appeal to be argued or submitted when reached. The stay contained in the order to show cause, dated January 11, 1961, is continued pending the hearing and determination of the appeal. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, McNally, Stevens and Eager, JJ.
Exhibit 99(e)





CERTIFICATE REGARDINGPPL ELECTRIC UTILITIES CORPORATION'S 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED
  DECEMBER 31, 2002





In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of PPL Electric
  Utilities Corporation (the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2002,
  as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
  "Covered Report"), I, the principal executive officer of the Company, pursuant
  to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
  Act of 2002, hereby certify that:





| | · | The Covered Report fully complies with the requirements
      of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
      and                   
| | - | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |   |                                                                                                                                                                         
| | · | The information contained in the Covered Report
      fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
      of operations of the Company.





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have executed this certificate as of
  this 3rd day of March, 2003.









| | /s/ Michael E.
      BrayMichael E. Bray
      President 
      PPL Electric Utilities Corporation
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
## PRELIMINARY TEC HNICAL SUPPORT DOCUM ENT (TSD):

ENERGY CONSERVATION PROGRAM FOR CERTAIN

COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL EQUIP MENT :

Commercial Refrigeration Equipment

March 30

, 201 1

U.S. Department of Energy

Assistant Secretary

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

Building Technologies Program

Appliances and Commercial Equipment Standards

Washington, DC 20585This Document was prepared for the Department of Energy

by staff members of

Navigant Consulting, Inc.

and

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
#### 1416.203-4 Contract clauses.

An economic price adjustment clause based on actual cost of labor or material may be used after approval by the BPC, without the power of redelegation.
§ 282.3 Definitions. ( a ) *Armed Forces.* The Army, the Navy, the Air Force, the Marine Corps, and the Coast Guard.
( b ) *Claim.* A demand for money or property under one of the following statutes: 31 U.S.C. 3702, 10 U.S.C. 2575, 10 U.S.C. 2771, 24 U.S.C. 420, 10 U.S.C. 4712, 10 U.S.C. 9712, 37 U.S.C. 554, or 32 U.S.C. 714.
( c ) *Committee.* The person or persons invested, by order of a proper court, with the guardianship of a minor or incompetent person and /or the estate of a minor or incompetent person.
( d ) *Component Concerned.* The agency/activity (as well as the official designated by the Head of the agency/activity) required to perform the function or take the action indicated or from whose activity a claim arose.
( e ) *Final Action.* A finding by the appropriate official under this part concerning a claim from which there is no right to appeal or request reconsideration, or concerning which the time limit prescribed in this part for submitting an appeal or request for reconsideration has expired without such a submission.
( f ) *Member.* A member or former member of the Uniformed Services.
( g ) *Secretary Concerned.* The Secretary of the Army, addressing matters concerning the Army. The Secretary of the Navy, addressing matters concerning the Navy, the Marine Corps, and the Coast Guard when it is operating as a Service in the Navy. The Secretary of the Air Force, addressing matters concerning the Air Force. The Secretary of Homeland Security, addressing matters concerning the Coast Guard when it is not operating as a Service in the Navy. The Secretary of Health and Human Services, addressing matters concerning the PHS. The Secretary of Commerce, addressing matters concerning the NOAA.
( h ) *Settlement.* A claim and the amount due that is administratively determined to be valid.
( i ) *Uniformed Services.* The Army, the Navy, the Air Force, the Marine Corps, the Coast Guard, and the Commissioned Corps of the PHS and the NOAA.
### §7449. Investigations and power to subpoena

#### (a) Investigations

The Secretary may make such investigations as the Secretary considers necessary—

(1) for the effective administration of this subchapter; and

(2) to determine whether any person has engaged or is engaging in an act that constitutes a violation of this subchapter, or an order, rule, or regulation issued under this subchapter.

#### (b) Subpoenas, oaths, and affirmations

#### (1) In general

For the purpose of an investigation under subsection (a), the Secretary may administer oaths and affirmations, subpoena witnesses, take evidence, and issue subpoenas to require the production of any records that are relevant to the inquiry. The attendance of witnesses and the production of records may be required from any place in the United States.

#### (2) Administrative hearings

For the purpose of an administrative hearing held under section 7447 or 7448 of this title, the presiding officer is authorized to administer oaths and affirmations, subpoena and compel the attendance of witnesses, take evidence, and require the production of any records that are relevant to the inquiry. The attendance of witnesses and the production of records may be required from any place in the United States.

#### (c) Aid of courts

In the case of contumacy by, or refusal to obey a subpoena issued to, any person, the Secretary may invoke the aid of any court of the United States within the jurisdiction of which the investigation or proceeding is carried on, or where the person resides or carries on business, in order to enforce a subpoena issued by the Secretary under subsection (b). The court may issue an order requiring the person to comply with the subpoena.

#### (d) Contempt

A failure to obey an order of the court under this section may be punished by the court as contempt of the court.

#### (e) Process

Process may be served on a person in the judicial district in which the person resides or carries on business or wherever the person may be found.

#### (f) Hearing site

The site of a hearing held under section 7447 or 7448 of this title shall be in the judicial district where the person affected by the hearing resides or has a principal place of business.

(Pub. L. 104–127, title V, §540, Apr. 4, 1996, 110 Stat. 1062.)
#### EAMES v. KELLAR et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

November 17, 1903.)

Action by Elisha D. Eames against Barton H. Kellar and others.

No opinion. Motion for stay of proceedings pending appeal to the Appellate Division denied, with $10 costs.
§ 989.20 Final EIS. ( a ) If changes in the draft EIS are minor or limited to factual corrections and responses to comments, the proponent and EPF may, with the prior approval of HQ USAF/A7CI and SAF/IEI, prepare a document containing only comments on the Draft EIS, Air Force responses, and errata sheets of changes staffed to the HQ USAF ESOHC for coordination. However, the EPF must submit the Draft EIS and all of the above documents, with a new cover sheet indicating that it is a final EIS (40 CFR 1503.4(c)), to HQ USAF/A7CI for filing with the EPA (40 CFR 1506.9). If more extensive modifications are required, the EPF must prepare a preliminary final EIS incorporating these modifications for coordination within the Air Force. Regardless of which procedure is followed, the final EIS must be processed in the same way as the draft EIS, including receipt of copies of the EIS by SAF/LLP, except that the public need not be invited to comment during the 30-day post-filing waiting period. The Final EIS should be furnished to every person, organization, or agency that made substantive comments on the Draft EIS or requested a copy. Although the EPF is not required to respond to public comments received during this period, comments received must be considered in determining final decisions such as identifying the preferred alternative, appropriate mitigations, or if a supplemental analysis is required.
( b ) The EPF processes all necessary supplements to EISs (40 CFR 1502.9) in the same way as the original Draft and Final EIS, except that a new scoping process is not required.
( c ) If major steps to advance the proposal have not occurred within 5 years from the date of the Final EIS approval, reevaluation of the documentation should be accomplished to ensure its continued validity.
[64 FR 38129, July 15, 1999, as amended at 66 FR 16868, Mar. 28, 2001; 72 FR 37106, July 9, 2007; 79 FR 35287, June 20, 2014]
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 155 

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Oversight and 

Accountability in the One Hundred Eighteenth Congress. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 24, 2023 

Mr. COMER submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on House Administration 

RESOLUTION 

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on 

Oversight and Accountability in the One Hundred Eighteenth Congress. 

1 Resolved, 

2 SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES. 

3 For the expenses of the Committee on Oversight and 

4 Accountability (hereafter in this resolution referred to as 

5 the ‘‘Committee’’), including the expenses of all staff sala6 ries, there shall be paid, out of the applicable accounts 

7 of the House of Representatives for committee salaries 

8 and expenses, not more than $29,923,637 for the One 

9 Hundred Eighteenth Congress. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 155 IH 

1 SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS. 

2 Of the amount specified in section 1— 

3 (1) not more than $14,772,228 shall be avail4 able for expenses incurred during the period begin5 ning at noon on January 3, 2023, and ending imme6 diately before noon on January 3, 2024; and 

7 (2) not more than $15,151,408 shall be avail8 able for expenses incurred during the period begin9 ning at noon on January 3, 2024, and ending imme10 diately before noon on January 3, 2025. 

11 SEC. 3. VOUCHERS. 

12 Payments under this resolution shall be made on 

13 vouchers authorized by the Committee, signed by the 

14 Chairman of the Committee, and approved in the manner 

15 directed by the Committee on House Administration. 

16 SEC. 4. REGULATIONS. 

17 Amounts made available under this resolution shall 

18 be expended in accordance with regulations prescribed by 

19 the Committee on House Administration. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v John J. Connerton, Appellant.

— Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Broome County, rendered October 5, 1977, convicting defendant on his plea of guilty of the crime of robbery in the second degree. On this appeal defendant contends that the court improperly denied him the right to consideration as a youthful offender since it would have resulted in the imposition of a longer period of imprisonment than the one meted out upon the plea that was entered. The record reveals that defendant’s plea was entered voluntarily, with full knowledge of the sentence to be imposed, in the presence of his retained counsel and after acknowledgment that he had committed the crime for which he stood charged. We are unable to say the court abused its discretion in denying youthful offender treatment *(People v Seay,*56 AD2d 971), particularly when the sentence imposed was the result of an agreement fully understood by the parties involved (see *People v Selikoff,*35 NY2d 227). Moreover, the sentence of imprisonment has been *1029served, and the relief defendant seeks, if it is available, cannot be obtained on direct appeal from the judgment of conviction. Judgment affirmed. Mahoney, P. J., Kane, Staley, Jr., and Main, JJ., concur; Greenblott, J., not taking part.
### §52. Repealed. June 25, 1948, ch. 646, §39, 62 Stat. 992, eff. Sept. 1, 1948

Section, R.S. §1986; acts May 28, 1896, ch. 252, §6, 29 Stat. 179; Feb. 26, 1919, ch. 49, §1, 40 Stat. 1182; Feb. 11, 1921, ch. 46, 41 Stat. 1099, related to fees of district attorneys, marshals, and clerks of court.
EXHIBIT 32



Certificate of Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officers



The following statement is being made to the Securities and Exchange Commission solely for purposes of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
1350), which carries with it certain criminal penalties in the event of a knowing or willful misrepresentation.



Securities and Exchange Commission

450 Fifth Street, NW

Washington, DC 20549



Re: Andrew Corporation



Ladies and Gentlemen:



In accordance with the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18
USC 1350), each of the undersigned hereby certifies that:



| | (i) | this Current Report on Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Andrew Corporation.
| | ---- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated as of this 13th day of December 2006.



|                                      |  |  |  |                                                     
|------------------------------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Ralph E. Faison                   |  |  |  | /s/ Marty R. Kittrell                               
|Ralph E. Faison                       |  |  |  | Marty R. Kittrell                                   
|President and Chief Executive Officer |  |  |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



80