alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
400 MARYLAND AVE. S.W., WASHINGTON, DC 20202-2800

www.ed.gov

The Department of Education’s mission is to promote student achievement and preparation for global competitiveness

by fostering educational excellence and ensuring equal access. 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES

OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION PROGRAMS

1/21/2022 

Honorable Dr. Cade Brumley

State Superintendent 

Louisiana Department of Education 

1201 North Third Street 

Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70802-5243 

cade.brumley@la.gov

Dear Superintendent Brumley: 

This letter addresses the Louisiana Department of Education’s (LDOE) submissions dated 

February 1, 2021, June 30, 2021, December 3, 2021, and December 20, 2021, in response to the 

Office of Special Education Programs’ (OSEP’s) required actions under the fiscal section of 

OSEP’s differentiated monitoring and support (DMS) report dated December 22, 2020. 

OSEP’s DMS report required LDOE to submit: 

1. Documentation demonstrating that any charter school LEA that received less than the

amount of Section 611 or Section 619 funds to which it was entitled in Federal fiscal year

(FFY) 2018 and/or FFY 2019 was made whole, or a plan outlining how LDOE will make

these charter school LEAs whole during FFY 2020 in accordance with 34 C.F.R.

§§ 300.705, 300.816, 76.791-76.793, and 76.796, and the Department’s December 2000

Guidance; and

2. Policies and procedures that demonstrate the SEA will conduct any reallocations of the

Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) Part B funds in accordance with the

requirements in 34 CFR §§ 300.705(c) and 300.817, and including communication

regarding the operational status of charter school LEAs to help ensure that grant

closeouts, when required, are handled in a timely and appropriate manner; and

3. Revised State policies and procedures for fiscal monitoring, including LEAs’ correction

of identified noncompliance and the SEA’s tracking of those corrective actions taken by

LEAs, consistent with the requirements of IDEA, the Single Audit Act Amendments of

1996 (31 U.S.C. §§ 7501-7506), and the Uniform Guidance; and

4. A copy of the correspondence in which the State has informed its State audit office,

which is responsible for conducting audits in accordance with the Single Audit Act and

the Uniform Guidance, of this finding of noncompliance and OSEP’s required corrective

actions.

Upon reviewing the State’s submissions, OSEP has determined that LDOE has met the above 

required actions, and no further action is needed specific to the required actions. OSEP 
Page 2 – Honorable Dr. Cade Brumley

appreciates the cooperation and assistance provided by your State staff in addressing the fiscal 

requirements related to Part B of the IDEA. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to 

call your OSEP State Lead, Bryan Grigg at Bryan.Grigg@ed.gov or 202-245-8107. 

Sincerely,

Valerie C. Williams

Director

Office of Special Education Programs

cc: Meredith Jordan

 Executive Director of Diverse Learners
<PAGE>

                                PPL CORPORATION
                      PPL ELECTRIC UTILITIES CORPORATION.

                              1999 ANNUAL REPORT
                   TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                                 ON FORM 10-K

                               POWER OF ATTORNEY
                               -----------------

         The undersigned directors of PPL Corporation and PPL Electric Utilities
Corporation, both Pennsylvania corporations, which are to file with the
Securities and Exchange Commission, Washington, D.C., under the provisions of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, their 1999 Annual Report on
Form 10-K, do hereby appoint William F. Hecht, John R. Biggar and Robert J. Grey
their true and lawful attorney, and each of them their true and lawful attorney,
with power to act without the other and with full power of substitution and
resubstitution, to execute for them and in their names said Form 10-K Report and
any and all amendments thereto, whether said amendments add to, delete from or
otherwise alter said Form 10-K Report, or add or withdraw any exhibits or
schedules to be filed therewith and any and all instruments in connection
therewith.  The undersigned hereby grant to said attorneys and each of them full
power and authority to do and perform in the name of and on behalf of the
undersigned, and in any and all capacities, any act and thing whatsoever
required or necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully and to all
intents and purposes as the undersigned might do, hereby ratifying and approving
the acts of said attorneys and each of them.
<PAGE>

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have hereunto set their hands and
seals this 25th day of February, 2000.


By: /s/ Frederick M. Bernthal      L.S.   By: /s/ Stuart Heydt              L.S.
    -------------------------------           ------------------------------
        Frederick M. Bernthal                     Stuart Heydt


By: /s/ E. Allen Deaver            L.S.   By: /s/ Frank A. Long             L.S.
    -------------------------------           ------------------------------
        E. Allen Deaver                           Frank A. Long


By: /s/ William J. Flood           L.S.   By:  /s/ Norman Robertson         L.S.
    -------------------------------           ------------------------------
        William J. Flood                           Norman Robertson


By: /s/ Elmer D. Gates             L.S.   By: /s/ Marilyn Ware              L.S.
    -------------------------------           ------------------------------
        Elmer D. Gates                            Marilyn Ware


By: /s/ William F. Hecht           L.S.
    -------------------------------
        William F. Hecht
### §2278. Consistency with international obligations of United States

#### (a) In general

Prior to the promulgation of, or amendment to, any order or plan under a research and promotion program relating to research and promotion of any agricultural commodity or product, after November 28, 1990, where such order or plan would provide for an assessment on imports, the Secretary of Agriculture shall consult with the United States Trade Representative regarding the consistency of the provisions of the order or plan with the international obligations of the United States.

#### (b) Compliance with U.S. international obligations

The Secretary of Agriculture shall take all steps necessary and appropriate to ensure that any order or plan or amendment to such order or plan, and the implementation and enforcement of any order or plan or amendment to such order or plan, or program as it relates to imports is nondiscriminatory and in compliance with the international obligations of the United States, as interpreted by the United States Trade Representative.

#### (c) Construction

Nothing in this section shall be construed as providing for a cause of action under this section.

(Pub. L. 101–624, title XIX, §1999T, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 3928.)
#### 1352.271-73 Schedule of work.

As prescribed in 48 CFR 1371.104, insert the following clause.

# Schedule of Work (APR 2010)

(a) Notwithstanding other requirements specified in this contract, the contractor shall provide to the Contracting Officer and COR the following documents within five (5) working days of the vessel's arrival at the contractor's facility:

(1) Production Schedule.

(2) Work Package Network.

(3) Total Manpower Loading Curve.

(4) Trade Manning Curves.

(5) Subcontracting List.

(b) The Production Schedule shall list the earliest, latest, and scheduled start and completion date for each work item awarded and shall identify the critical path. The Work Package Network shall show the work items, milestones, key events, and activities and shall clearly identify the critical path. The Total Manpower Loading Curve shall show the required manning for the duration of the contract. The Trade Manning Curves shall show the required manning for each trade for the duration of the contract. The Subcontracting List shall show work items, milestones, key events, and activities to be accomplished by subcontractors.

(c) Additional Item Requirements ordered and agreed upon, whether or not yet formalized via a change order (contract modification), shall be added to the Production Schedule, Trade Manning Curves, and Subcontracting List and submitted to the Contracting Officer and COR at each weekly Progress Meeting. Any anticipated or unanticipated deviation (greater than five (5) calendar days) from the Production Schedule shall be immediately brought to the attention of the Contracting Officer and COR.

(d) Any unauthorized deviation in the Production Schedule which results in a delay in the completion of work on a vessel past the established performance period completion date may entitle the Government to remedies for late performance, including, but not limited to, liquidated damages.

(End of clause)

[75 FR 10570, Mar. 8, 2010; 75 FR 14496, Mar. 26, 2010]
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ABATEMENT ORDER

Appellate case name: Ex parte Julia Rodriguez

Appellate case number: 01-16-00488-CR

Trial court case number: 2094222

Trial court: County Criminal Court at Law No. 12 of Harris County

Julia Rodriguez appeals from the trial court’s denial of her application for writ of habeas 

corpus. The clerk’s record contains no certification of the right to appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P.

25.2(d) (when defendant is appellant, record must include certification of defendant’s right to 

appeal). 

In her underlying criminal appeal, Rodriguez received deferred adjudication community 

supervision and it appears that her deferred adjudication was terminated and she was discharged. 

Rodriguez has not made payment arrangements for the filing of the reporter’s record. 

In July, Rodriguez’s counsel filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. We denied this motion 

because it did not comply with Rule 42.2(a) in that it was not signed by Rodriguez and the 

certificate of service did not reflect counsel served Rodriguez with the motion. 

Accordingly, we order this appeal abated and we remand the cause to the trial court for 

further proceedings. The trial court shall immediately conduct a hearing at which a 

representative of the Harris County District Attorney’s Office and appellant’s counsel, Windi 

Akins Pastorini, shall be present. Appellant shall also be present for the hearing in person.

We direct the trial court to:

1) Execute a certification of appellant’s right to appeal; and

2) Make any other findings and recommendations the trial court deems appropriate. 

In particular, the trial court should determine whether appellant desires to 

prosecute her appeal or has abandoned her appeal. 

3) If the trial court determines appellant desires to prosecute her appeal, the trial 

court shall determine whether appellant is indigent for purposes of the filing of 

the record.

See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2), (d), (f), 34.5(a)(12), (c)(2), 35.3(c), 37.1, 37.3(a)(2). 
The trial court shall have a court reporter, or court recorder, record the hearing. The trial 

court clerk is directed to file a supplemental clerk’s record containing the certification of 

appellant’s right to appeal and any other findings, recommendations, and orders of the trial court, 

with this Court no later than 30 days from the date of this order. See TEX. R. APP. P.

34.5(c)(2).

The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this Court’s active 

docket. The appeal will be reinstated on this Court’s active docket when the supplemental clerk’s 

record is filed with the Clerk of this Court. The court coordinator of the trial court shall set a 

hearing date and notify the parties.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Harvey Brown

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: October 21, 2016
#### Abe Jacovsky et al., Respondents, v. Leonard Proscero, Defendant, and A. J. Bell Co., Appellant.

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injury, etc., the defendant A. J. Bell Co. appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated May 20, 1964, as, in granting plaintiffs’ motion to settle a typewritten transcript of the stenographic minutes of the trial (for the purpose of an appeal to this court from a judgment dismissing the complaint at the close of the ease after a jury trial), authorized the abridgement of the transcript by omitting the medical testimony of the doctor. Order, insofar as appealed from, reversed, without costs; plaintiffs’ motion insofar as it seeks such abridgement of the transcript denied; and transcript directed to be settled by including therein all the testimony adduced at the trial (see *Ferry*v. *Tauro,*21 A D 2d 804, and cases therein cited). Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Brennan, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>




Exhibit 32
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Emerson Radio Corp. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006, filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission, Adrian Ma, Chief Executive Officer, and John D.
Florian, Deputy Chief Financial Officer, of the Company each hereby certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates
presented and the consolidated result of operations of the Company for the
periods presented.


Dated: November 14, 2006

                                          By: /s/ Adrian Ma
                                          -------------------------------------
                                          Adrian Ma
                                          Chief Executive Officer


                                          By: /s/ John D. Florian
                                          -------------------------------------
                                          John D. Florian
                                          Deputy Chief Financial Officer and
                                          Controller


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter
63 of Title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form
10-Q or as a separate disclosure document.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Emerson Radio Corp. and will be
retained by Emerson Radio Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 31.1
 
      a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andd)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and
 b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 September 3, 2010
    /s/ Eugene S. KahnEugene S. KahnChief Executive Officer 35
##### 



Exhibit
3.1
 AMENDED AND RESTATED BYLAWS
 of
 CLAIRES STORES, INC.
(a Florida corporation)
 December 5, 2006
 OFFICES
   MEETINGS OF SHAREHOLDERS




---



##### 








---



##### 



th




---



##### 



th




---



##### 








---



##### 








---



##### 



th th




---



##### 








---



##### 



DIRECTORS
 General
  General




---



##### 



Vacancies
  Resignation




---



##### 



Committees of Directors




---



##### 



Compensation of Directors
  Action by Directors Without Meeting
  Removal of Directors
  Indemnification of Directors and Officers




---



##### 



NOTICES
   OFFICERS
    Chairman of the Board




---



##### 



Chief Executive Officer
  Chief Financial Officer
  Chief Operating Officer
  President




---



##### 



Vice Presidents
  Secretary and Assistant Secretaries
   Treasurer and Assistant Treasurer




---



##### 



CERTIFICATES OF STOCK
      Lost Certificates




---



##### 



CORPORATION BOOKS
  GENERAL PROVISIONS
   Execution of Instruments
  Fiscal Year
  Corporate Seal




---



##### 



Voting Upon Stocks
  EMERGENCY BYLAWS




---



##### 



AMENDMENTS
#### 1437.7102 Clauses.

The CO shall insert the clause at 1452.237-70, Information Collection—Department of the Interior, in all solicitations and contracts which are subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980.
#### 1316.603-3 Limitations.

The designee authorized to determine that a letter contract is suitable so that work can begin immediately is set forth in CAM 1301.70.
E ECUTIVE 

FL!TEWAVS 

January 15, 2014 

ONE CLARK DRIVE, RONKONKOMA, NY 11779 

(631) 588-3480 ext. 128 fax: (631) 588-55~7.-, IE'rf ... ".I i 1\ 01-

. :~;:JRTfi.TION 'u"':_: ~?ER/..TICJ, .S 

zu~~ Ft:3 -3 p /: 41 

This letter constitutes a formal request for an exemption to eliminate the six month trial 

period to add the iPad Mini and iPad Air to our list of approved EFB's. Executive 

Fliteways, Inc. (EFI) first obtained approval for a paperless cockpit utilizing the Solid FX 

EFB April of 2011. At that time Apple had yet to complete the required decompression 

testing of the iPad which would permit use of the device as a Class I EFB. 

Once the testing had been accomplished, EFI received approval to immediately begin 

using the iPad I and II without another six month trial period. Since that time, the units 

have operated without any problem or incident reported by any flight crewmember. 

Apple has since introduced two variants of the original iPad called the iPad Mini and 

iPad Air. They are virtually identical to the original iPad except that the mini has a 

smaller screen and the Air has a retina display and faster processor. The operating 

system, processors etc., are basically identical to the original version . 

. W.f? have tested the iPad Mini and the iPad Air in each of our aircraft to ensure that 

there are no issues of electromagnetic interference with any aircraft system. We utilized 

.,. .the FAA EF~ Electromagnetic Compatibility Assessment form to conduct these reviews . 

. ,J~st as we found ·with the original iPad, there are no negative affects to any aircraft 

system utilizing either unit. 

A six month trial period to ens.ure .that the -iPad .Mini and Air perform identically to the 

larger variant seems pointless and in reality will cause an economic hardship as we will 

be required. to maintain three workable EFB's and obtain an additional Jeppesen 

subscription for each additional EFB. Additionally;- there seems to be a non-standard 

interpretation of the need for subsequent trial periods as other FSDO's have waived this 

requirement for their operators. 

I believe the original purpose of the· six month trial ·period was to ensure that the 

operator has the internal controls and procedures to perform terminal and enroute 

operations safely in a paperless environment and as EFB's were new to the industry, to 

ensure their reliabllity .. We have utilized EFB's for almost three years without a single 

qperational error nor has a malfunction of an iPad been reported by any crewmember. 

The.idea of anoth~~ ~ix month trial period seems redundant and wasteful. 

< '"•' ,,•' '' • I 

Your. attention .to, this ma.tter is. greatly-appreciated: ""' .. ; .. 'I ~ ·~ ~ 

•·' ~ .. 

K~!}neth ~s. Gray · .. · 

Director of Operations 

• f ' ~ 

~ _'I, • ...... • - r• •r · ~ , ~ .. """ ,._.. 'j :• J 1 f .,~ 1 • · _, ""\ !&" ~ • • • • ~ ~~ ~ ~ - .. - • "' - \ - ... lljl ,. • .. ' ... -

. r'' ~ ' ·.:·· r- .... ' " t. ~. . •• l-• ~. ~ ·• .... -... . ~ ... ) ~ '- . . . - ... . . 

1: • ' .· 

; .. ' . ~· . 

,_ ....
#### The People of the State of New York v. Carl Edelson.

Motion for leave to reargue denied. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, Valente and McNally, JJ.
#### 1352.271-86 Lay days.

As prescribed in 48 CFR 1371.117, insert the following clause:

# Lay Days (APR 2010)

(a) A lay day is defined as an additional day on dry dock or marine railway caused by a Government-issued change. Reimbursement for lay days shall be paid at the rate stated in the Schedule.

(b) No amount for lay day time shall be paid until all contract line items (including optional items) that require drydocking of the vessel have been completed. Lay days for work ordered pursuant to the Additional Item Requirements Clause shall not be compensable unless all dry dock work included in the contract line items is complete.

(c) Days of hauling out and floating, whatever the hour, shall not be paid as lay day time, and days when no work is performed by the contractor shall not be paid as lay day time. Days in which work is performed that are considered normal “non-work” days (weekends or holidays) shall not be paid as lay day time if the ship would have otherwise been in dry dock.

(d) Payment of lay day time shall constitute complete compensation for all costs associated with lay days except for costs directly related to the changed work.

(End of clause)

[75 FR 10570, Mar. 8, 2010; 75 FR 14496, Mar. 26, 2010]
Exhibit 99.3

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION, 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscalquarter ended November 30, 2002 (the Report) by Farmland Industries, Inc. (the Company),the undersigned, as the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certified pursuantto 18 U.S.C., ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or Section 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:  January 14, 2003                                            

/s/ STEVEN R. RHODESSteven R. Rhodes,Chief Financial Officer