alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
###### Editorial Note on Part 842

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 842 appear at 81 FR 83688, Nov. 22, 2016.

#### § 842.1 Scope of this subpart.

This subpart explains terms used in this part. It states basic Air Force claims policy and identifies proper claimants.
### Part G—Support Anti-Terrorism by Fostering Effective Technologies
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 551 

To establish responsibility for the International Outfall Interceptor. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 7, 2017 

Mr. MCCAIN (for himself and Mr. FLAKE) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations 

A BILL 

To establish responsibility for the International Outfall 

Interceptor. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Nogales Wastewater 

5 Fairness Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. INTERNATIONAL OUTFALL INTERCEPTOR REPAIR, 

7 OPERATIONS, AND MAINTENANCE. 

8 (a) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

9 (1) AGREEMENT.—The term ‘‘Agreement’’ 

10 means the memorandum of agreement between the 

11 United States Section of the International Boundary 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 551 IS

1 and Water Commission and the City of Nogales, Ar2 izona, dated January 20, 2006. 

3 (2) CITY.—The term ‘‘City’’ means the City of 

4 Nogales, Arizona. 

5 (3) NOGALES SANITATION PROJECT.—The term 

6 ‘‘Nogales sanitation project’’ means the project 

7 owned by the City and the United States Section of 

8 the International Boundary and Water Commission 

9 and includes— 

10 (A) the International Outfall Interceptor 

11 (IOI) and the trunkline; and 

12 (B) the Nogales International Wastewater 

13 Treatment Plant (NIWTP). 

14 (b) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Con15 gress that, pursuant to the Act of July 27, 1953 (22 

16 U.S.C. 277d–10 et seq.), and notwithstanding the Agree17 ment, an equitable proportion of the costs of operation and 

18 maintenance of the Nogales sanitation project to be con19 tributed by the City should be based on the average daily 

20 volume of wastewater originating from the City. 

21 (c) CAPITAL COSTS EXCLUDED.—Pursuant to the 

22 Agreement and the Act of July 27, 1953 (22 U.S.C. 

23 277d–10 et seq.), the City shall have no obligation to con24 tribute to any capital costs of repairing or upgrading the 

25 Nogales sanitation project. 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 551 IS

1 (d) OVERCHARGES.—Notwithstanding the Agree2 ment, the United States Section of the International 

3 Boundary and Water Commission shall not charge the 

4 City after the date of enactment of this Act for operations 

5 and maintenance costs in excess of an equitable proportion 

6 of the costs, as described in subsection (b). 

Æ 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

April 23, 2012 

h0416 

Order 

 

April 23, 2012 

143896 & (75) 

WILLIAM ADAM, Individually and as 

Personal Representative of the Estate of 

MARGARET ADAM, 

Plaintiff-Appellant/Cross-Appellee, 

v SC: 143896 

 COA: 292144 

 Macomb CC: 2007-001381-NO 

SISTERS OF BON SECOURS NURSING 

CARE CENTER, 

Defendant-Appellee/Cross-Appellant. 

____________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 6, 2011 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The application 

for leave to appeal as cross-appellant is therefore moot and is DENIED. 

HATHAWAY, J., would grant leave to appeal.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 690 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 690

  To extend the eligibility of redesignated areas as HUBZones from 3 
                           years to 7 years.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 21, 2017

 Mr. Cardin (for himself, Mr. Risch, Mrs. Shaheen, Ms. Hirono, and Mr. 
  Van Hollen) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
    referred to the Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To extend the eligibility of redesignated areas as HUBZones from 3 
                           years to 7 years.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``HUBZone Investment Protection Act''.

SEC. 2. MODIFICATION TO THE HUBZONE PROGRAM.

    Section 3(p)(4)(C) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 
632(p)(4)(C)) is amended by striking ``until the later of'' and all 
that follows and inserting ``for the 7-year period following the date 
on which the census tract or nonmetropolitan county ceased to be so 
qualified.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v. John Henry Schuster, Jr., Respondent.

Order unanimously reversed, indictment reinstated, and matter remitted to Brie County Court for further proceedings in accordance with memorandum. Memorandum: We find that the exercise of sound discretion required a hearing to determine whether the conduct of the defendant during the period from the issuance of the warrant to the time of his arrest constituted a waiver of his right to a speedy trial, as well as whether the conduct of the law enforcement agencies during that same period was such as to deny the defendant a speedy trial. (Appeal by People from order of Erie County Court dismissing Indictment No. 28169 as to defendant Schuster.) Present — Bastow, J. P., Goldman, Henry and Noonan, JJ.
Exhibit 32.2

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                   18 U.S.C. ss.1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     Solely for the purposes of complying with, and the extent required by 18
U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, the undersigned certifies, in his capacity as the Chief Financial
Officer of Federal Mortgage Corporation of Puerto Rico, Inc., that, to his
knowledge, the Quarterly Report of the company on Form 10-QSB for the period
ended June 30, 2004, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
company's financial condition and results of operations.




/s/ Michael Schumacher
Michael Schumacher, Chief Financial Officer
August 18, 2004
#### In re CROUCH. In the matter of the estate of George W. Crouch. In re BENTLEY. In the matter of S. D. Bentley.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

December 1, 1903.)

No opinion. Motioi for reargument denied, with $10 costs.
#### 14.503 Procedures.
Case: 1:12-cv-01132 Document #: 450-1 Filed: 09/13/17 Page 1 of 16 PageID #:6841
Case: 1:12-cv-01132 Document #: 450-1 Filed: 09/13/17 Page 2 of 16 PageID #:6842
Case: 1:12-cv-01132 Document #: 450-1 Filed: 09/13/17 Page 3 of 16 PageID #:6843
Case: 1:12-cv-01132 Document #: 450-1 Filed: 09/13/17 Page 4 of 16 PageID #:6844
Case: 1:12-cv-01132 Document #: 450-1 Filed: 09/13/17 Page 5 of 16 PageID #:6845
Case: 1:12-cv-01132 Document #: 450-1 Filed: 09/13/17 Page 6 of 16 PageID #:6846
Case: 1:12-cv-01132 Document #: 450-1 Filed: 09/13/17 Page 7 of 16 PageID #:6847
Case: 1:12-cv-01132 Document #: 450-1 Filed: 09/13/17 Page 8 of 16 PageID #:6848
Case: 1:12-cv-01132 Document #: 450-1 Filed: 09/13/17 Page 9 of 16 PageID #:6849
Case: 1:12-cv-01132 Document #: 450-1 Filed: 09/13/17 Page 10 of 16 PageID #:6850
Case: 1:12-cv-01132 Document #: 450-1 Filed: 09/13/17 Page 11 of 16 PageID #:6851
Case: 1:12-cv-01132 Document #: 450-1 Filed: 09/13/17 Page 12 of 16 PageID #:6852
Case: 1:12-cv-01132 Document #: 450-1 Filed: 09/13/17 Page 13 of 16 PageID #:6853
Case: 1:12-cv-01132 Document #: 450-1 Filed: 09/13/17 Page 14 of 16 PageID #:6854
Case: 1:12-cv-01132 Document #: 450-1 Filed: 09/13/17 Page 15 of 16 PageID #:6855
Case: 1:12-cv-01132 Document #: 450-1 Filed: 09/13/17 Page 16 of 16 PageID #:6856
### §7757. Severability

If any provision of this chapter or application of any provision of this chapter to any person or circumstances is held invalid, the remainder of this chapter and the application of the provision to other persons and circumstances shall not be affected by the invalidity.

(Pub. L. 106–224, title IV, §437, June 20, 2000, 114 Stat. 454.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this title", meaning title IV of Pub. L. 106–224, June 20, 2000, 114 Stat. 438, known as the Plant Protection Act, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of title IV to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 7701 of this title and Tables.
TO: Borrower Defense Director

Federal Student Aid 

FROM: The Chief Operating Officer

 Federal Student Aid 

SUBJECT: Delegation of Authority to Reconsider or Reopen Borrower Defense 

Applications under 34 C.F.R. § 685.222(e) or any successor regulations

I. DELEGATION

Under the authority vested in me by the Secretary through delegation number 

EA/EN/99, certified on February 16, 2022, I hereby delegate to you, your 

successor in function, and anyone serving for you in an acting capacity or 

delegated the authority to perform the functions and duties of your position as 

follows: 

A. The authority under 34 C.F.R. § 685.222(e)(5)(i) or any successor 

regulation to reconsider a borrower defense application at any time 

when a borrower identifies new evidence that was not considered in 

making the previous decision. 

B. The authority under 34 C.F.R. § 685.222(e)(5)(ii) or any successor 

regulation to reopen a borrower defense application at any time to 

consider evidence that was not considered in making the previous 

decision. 

C. The authority to reconsider a borrower defense application at any time 

if a clear error of fact or law is discovered in a previous decision made 

by any official at the Department.

D. The authority to reopen a borrower defense application at any time if a 

clear error of fact or law is discovered in a previous decision made by 

any official at the Department.

E. The authority under 34 C.F.R. § 685.222(e)(2) or any successor 

regulation to carry out the procedures for granting forbearances and for 

defaulted loans associated with any borrower defense application

reconsidered or reopened under the authorities delegated above. 

F. For any borrower defense application reconsidered or reopened under 

the authorities delegated above, the authority to review such borrower 
defense application under the procedures delineated under 34 C.F.R. 

§ 685.222(e)(3) or any successor regulation, including the designation 

of a Department official to process the reconsidered or reopened 

borrower application. 

Unless otherwise noted in future delegations of authority, amendments to the 

authorities delegated herein are included in the scope of this delegation. 

II. RESERVATIONS

None. 

III. REDELEGATION

Subject to applicable provisions of law, you may redelegate any of the authorities 

delegated to you and may authorize further redelegation. All redelegations must 

be prepared in accordance with the Administrative Communications Systems 

directive, OM:1-102, Delegations of Authority. 

IV. CERTIFICATION AND EFFECTIVE DATE

This delegation is effective upon certification by the Department’s Principal 

Delegations Control Officer. 

I ratify actions within the scope of this delegation taken by you prior to the date of 

certification.

 ______________s/_________ 

 Richard Cordray 

OGC Clearance and Date: Michael Taylor, 2/17/2022 

Certification Date: 2/18/2022 

DOA: EN/ENAC/100

Delegations Control Officer: Jim Clemmens
### §3175d. Administration of program of food, nutrition, and consumer education by State cooperative extension services

#### (a) Administration by Secretary of Agriculture

The program provided for under section 3175c of this title shall be administered by the Secretary of Agriculture through the National Institute of Food and Agriculture, in consultation with the Food and Nutrition Service and the Human Nutrition Information Service. The Secretary shall ensure that the National Institute of Food and Agriculture coordinates activities carried out under this subtitle with the ongoing food, nutrition, and consumer education activities of other agencies of the Department of Agriculture.

#### (b) Evaluation and report

The Secretary of Agriculture, not later than April 1, 1989, shall submit to the Committee on Agriculture of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry of the Senate a report evaluating the effectiveness of the program provided for under section 3175c of this title.

(Pub. L. 99–198, title XV, §1587, Dec. 23, 1985, 99 Stat. 1596; Pub. L. 110–234, title VII, §7511(c)(11), May 22, 2008, 122 Stat. 1268; Pub. L. 110–246, §4(a), title VII, §7511(c)(11), June 18, 2008, 122 Stat. 1664, 2029.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This subtitle, referred to in subsec. (a), is subtitle C (§§1581–1589) of title XV of Pub. L. 99–198, which is classified as follows: sections 1581 and 1582 are not classified to the Code; section 1583 is set out as a note under section 2011 of this title; sections 1584 through 1588 are classified, respectively, to sections 3175a to 3175e of this title; and section 1589 is classified to section 3178a of this title.

#### Codification

Pub. L. 110–234 and Pub. L. 110–246 made identical amendments to this section. The amendments by Pub. L. 110–234 were repealed by section 4(a) of Pub. L. 110–246.

Section was enacted as part of the Food Security Act of 1985, and not as part of the National Agricultural Research, Extension, and Teaching Policy Act of 1977 which comprises this chapter.

#### Amendments

2008—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 110–246, §7511(c)(11), substituted "National Institute of Food and Agriculture" for "Extension Service" in two places.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2008 Amendment

Amendment of this section and repeal of Pub. L. 110–234 by Pub. L. 110–246 effective May 22, 2008, the date of enactment of Pub. L. 110–234, except as otherwise provided, see section 4 of Pub. L. 110–246, set out as an Effective Date note under section 8701 of this title.

Amendment by section 7511(c)(11) of Pub. L. 110–246 effective Oct. 1, 2009, see section 7511(c) of Pub. L. 110–246, set out as a note under section 1522 of this title.
### §7771. Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated such amounts as may be necessary to carry out this chapter. Except as specifically authorized by law, no part of the money appropriated under this section shall be used to pay indemnities for property injured or destroyed by or at the direction of the Secretary.

(Pub. L. 106–224, title IV, §441, June 20, 2000, 114 Stat. 455.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this title", meaning title IV of Pub. L. 106–224, June 20, 2000, 114 Stat. 438, known as the Plant Protection Act, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of title IV to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 7701 of this title and Tables.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of functions of the Secretary of Agriculture relating to agricultural import and entry inspection activities under this chapter to the Secretary of Homeland Security, and for treatment of related references, see sections 231, 551(d), 552(d), and 557 of Title 6, Domestic Security, and the Department of Homeland Security Reorganization Plan of November 25, 2002, as modified, set out as a note under section 542 of Title 6.
United States Department of the Interior 

BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT 

Washington, D.C. 20240 

http://www. blm .gov 

JUN 0 6 2016 

In Reply Refer To: 

3465 (280) 

Memorandum 

To: 

From: 

Environmental Protection Agency, Federal eRulemaking Portal: 

http://www.regulations.gov 

Subject: 

Acting Assistant Director, Resources and Planni~d ~ Notice of Opportunity to Provide Information on Existing Programs that Protect 

Water Quality from Forest Road Discharges, 80 Fed. Reg. 69,653 (Nov. 10, 2015) 

Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OW-2015-0668 

The Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management (BLM) submits the following 

information to supplement information previously provided to the U.S. Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) related to BLM's programs and tools that protect water quality from forest roads 

discharges. 

This document summarizes BLM's information related to EPA's,Federal Register Notice request 

for information related to the Best Management Practices (BMPs) the BLM has in place and the 

effectiveness of those BMPs as they relate to storm water discharges from forest roads. The 

BLM has solicited input from the BLM state offices, summarized the information below, and 

attached documents sent by BLM state offices for reference material. 

• Included in the materials are links to applicable BLM guidance documents such as 

manuals, handbooks and policies that contain BMP's addressing storm water runoff. 

There are links to existing agreements, i.e. Memorandum ofUnderstanding's, with state 

and federal agencies used to cooperatively address water quality, specifically in 

Colorado, Idaho, Montana (MT), Oregon (OR) and Utah (UT). 

• Included is a reference to the watershed restoration guidance from the Western Oregon 

Resource Management Plans (1995) as well as a discussion of the BLM's Land Health 

Watershed Assessments and examples of effectiveness monitoring ofBMP's from MT, 

ID and OR. 
If you have any questions on the submitted material, please contact McKinley-Ben Miller, 

Deputy Division Chief, Environmental Quality & Protection at (202) 912-7165, or by email at 

mbmiller@blm.gov. 

Attachment 

2
1328.102-1 Waiver policy. ( a ) Pursuant to the authority vested in the Secretary of Commerce, the requirements of 40 U.S.C. 3131 through 3133 may be waived by virtue of the authority vested in him or her pursuant to the Consolidated and Further Continuing Appropriations Act, 2015, Public Law 113-235, 128 Stat. 2130, Div. B, Title I, Sec. 111 (2014), with respect to contracts for the repair, alteration, and construction of NOAA's hydrographic survey, oceanographic research, and fisheries survey vessels operated by NOAA Office of Marine and Aviation Operations in the Atlantic and Pacific regions including the Pacific Islands. The Department's policy and procedures for use of the waiver authority is set forth in CAM 1328.102.
( b ) Contracting officers are required to consider any unusual circumstances that may arise in which either payment or performance bonds, or both, will be advantageous to the Government in connection with these contracts prior to issuing solicitations.
[80 FR 27267, May 13, 2015]
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. James Cherry, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Kings County, rendered January 15, 1960 after a jury trial, convicting him of grand larceny in the first degree and assault in the second degree, and sentencing him to serve concurrent terms of 5 to 10 years on the grand larceny count and 2% to 5 years on the assault count. Defendant appeals on the sole ground that the sentence was excessive. Judgment affirmed. In our opinion, on the basis of this record the trial court did not abuse its discretion in imposing the sentence upon defendant. For the crimes committed, such sentence was within the limits prescribed by the applicable statutes (Penal Law, §§ 243, 1295). Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Hill and Rabin, JJ., concur.
#### 1352.209-70 Potential organizational conflict of interest.

As prescribed in 48 CFR 1309.507-1(a), insert the following provision, modified appropriately:

# Potential Organizational Conflict of Interest (APR 2010)

(a) There is a potential organizational conflict of interest (*see* FAR Subpart 9.5, Organizational and Consultant Conflicts of Interest) due to [*state the nature of the potential conflict*]. Accordingly:

(1) Restrictions are needed to ensure that (*state the nature of the proposed restraint and the applicable time period*).

(2) As a part of the proposal, the offeror shall provide the Contracting Officer with complete information regarding previous or ongoing work that is in any way associated with the contemplated acquisition.

(b) If award is made to the offeror, the resulting contract may include an organizational conflict of interest limitation applicable to subsequent Government work, at either a prime contract level, at any subcontract tier, or both. During evaluation of proposals, the Government may, after discussions with the offeror and consideration of ways to avoid the conflict of interest, insert a provision in the resulting contract that shall disqualify the offeror from further consideration for award of specified future contracts.

(c) The organizational conflict of interest clause included in this solicitation may be modified or deleted during negotiations.

*Alternate I* (Date). At the discretion of the Contracting Officer, substitute the following paragraph (b) for paragraphs (b) and (c) in the basic provision:

(b) The organizational conflict of interest clause in this solicitation may not be modified or deleted.

(End of clause)

[75 FR 10570, Mar. 8, 2010; 75 FR 14496, Mar. 26, 2010]