alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>     5
<LEGEND>      THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL 
              INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE COMPANY'S
              FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE PERIOD
              ENDING MARCH 31, 1998, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
              ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
              STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>  1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                    MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                          $       106
<SECURITIES>                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                        13,210
<ALLOWANCES>                              0
<INVENTORY>                          10,358
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                     24,754
<PP&E>                               84,015
<DEPRECIATION>                       48,398
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                       69,718
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                13,712
<BONDS>                                 400
<COMMON>                              1,086
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                               0
<OTHER-SE>                           41,038
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>         69,718
<SALES>                              78,636
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                     78,636
<CGS>                                67,475
<TOTAL-COSTS>                        72,304
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      113
<INCOME-PRETAX>                       6,219
<INCOME-TAX>                          2,114
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                   4,105
<DISCONTINUED>                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                          4,105
<EPS-PRIMARY>                          3.78
<EPS-DILUTED>                          3.78
        

</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Benjamin Fishman, Respondent, v. Irving Boyarsky et al., Doing Business as Bayard Motor Co., et al., Appellants. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.

Appeal from a decision and award of the Workmen’s Compensation Board, appellants contesting only the finding of employment and asserting that claimant worked as an independent contractor in buying used and new cars from dealers for resale by the appellant partnership, an automobile dealer, alleged and found to have been the employer and for convenience hereinafter referred to as such. Claimant bought cars for some five years prior to the accident, exclusively for the employer, who had other buyers as well. He reported personally at the employer’s office periodically if not daily. The employer directed him “what to buy and what not to buy” and exercised complete control as to the extent of his territory and as to the firms from which he might purchase cars. He had to obtain permission before negotiating with any dealer and as to particular dealers his instructions might be changed from time to time. Upon each purchase, as “ a convenience to facilitate the sale ”, he issued his personal check which the employer in effect paid by depositing funds to cover it. He advised the employer by telephone of each purchase shortly before or shortly after issuing his check and in some eases apparently obtained advance approval. He received weekly payment of what he termed his “ commissions ”, being 50% of the net profits on the sales of cars purchased by him. The employer’s report *540of injury, filed two days after the accident, stated (as did a subsequent report) that claimant was employed by it as a buyer and had been so employed for six years on a commission basis. The employer made and reported regular with-holdings for Federal income tax and F.I.C.A. employee tax. In his income tax return in evidence claimant identified himself as such employee and reported as wages his income from the employer. Testifying, he denied any joint venture and said, *“*they gave me my commission at the end of the week and that was it.” Feither of the employer partners nor any of their employees was called to testify in contradiction of claimant’s evidence. It was for the board to apply the conventional and long-recognized tests of an employer-employee relationship and when, as here, “ ‘ conflicting inferences are possible, the finding of the Board prevails.’” *(Matter of Gordon*v. *New York Life Ins. Co.,*300 N. Y. 652, 654, citing *Matter of Glielmi*v. *Netherland Dairy Co.,*254 N. Y. 60, 64 and Workmen’s Compensation Law, § 20; *Matter of Williams*v. *Nobbs & Williams,*286 App. Div. 897.) Decision and award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board.
### Part VII—Registration of Aliens
(May 8, 1962)

#### In the Matter of Jack’s Golf Range, Inc., Appellant, v. C. Eugene Baldwin et al., Constituting the Board of Zoning Appeals of the Town of Hempstead, Respondents.

Motion by respondents to dismiss appeal denied, on condition that appellant perfect the appeal and be ready to argue or submit it at the October Term, beginning October 1, 1962; appeal ordered on the *798calendar for said term. The record and appellant’s brief must be served and filed on or before August 20, 1962. Motion by appellant to dispense with printing the record on appeal, denied. Motion by appellant for a stay, pending appeal, of enforcement of the respondents’ determination of the order appealed from and of the local zoning ordinance against appellant and its property. Motion granted on the same conditions upon which the Special Term previously granted a stay incident to appellant’s application for reargument in this proceeding. Kleinfeld, Acting P. J., Brennan, Hill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ZHONGMING ZHOU,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 07-70906

Agency No. A095-302-749

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted June 29, 2010 ** 

Before: ALARCÓN, LEAVY, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.

ZhongMing Zhou, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the

Board of Immigration Appeals’ order affirming the immigration judge’s (“IJ”)

denial of asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against

Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C § 1252. We review for

FILED

JUL 07 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 07-70906

substantial evidence the agency’s adverse credibility findings. See Rivera v.

Mukasey, 508 F.3d 1271, 1274 (9th Cir. 2007). We deny the petition for review. 

The record does not compel the conclusion that Zhou demonstrated changed

circumstances to excuse the untimely filing of his asylum application. See 8

C.F.R. 208.4(a)(4); see also Ramadan v. Gonzales, 479 F.3d 646, 657–58 (9th Cir.

2007) (per curiam). Accordingly, we deny Zhou’s asylum claim. 

Substantial evidence supports the IJ’s adverse credibility finding because

Zhou testified inconsistently with respect to the date of his arrest and the length of

time he remained in China after his arrest. See Malhi v. INS, 336 F.3d 989, 993

(9th Cir. 2003). In the absence of corroborating evidence, his withholding of

removal claim fails. See Farah v. Ashcroft, 348 F.3d 1153, 1156 (9th Cir. 2003)

Finally, Zhou has failed to establish eligibility for CAT relief because

Zhou’s CAT claim is based on the same testimony the IJ found not credible and

Zhou points to no other evidence that the IJ should have considered. See id. at

1156–57.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
#### 1001.403 Individual deviations.

The SPE is authorized to approve individual contract FAR and DTAR deviations.
#### 1446.704 Authority for use of warranties.

The CCO is authorized to make the written determination to use a warranty in an acquisition.
#### § 809a.5 Barment procedures.

Under the authority of 50 U.S.C. 797, installation commanders may deny access to the installation through the use of a barment order. Barment orders should be in writing but may also be oral. Security forces maintain a list of personnel barred from the installation.
#### 1353.200 Scope of subpart.

This subpart prescribes or references DOC forms for use in acquisitions. Consistent with FAR 53.200, this subpart is arranged by subject matter, in the same order as and keyed to the parts of the CAR in which the form usage requirements are addressed.
### §1363. Deposit of and interest on cash received to secure immigration bonds

(a) Cash received by the Attorney General as security on an immigration bond shall be deposited in the Treasury of the United States in trust for the obligor on the bond, and shall bear interest payable at a rate determined by the Secretary of the Treasury, except that in no case shall the interest rate exceed 3 per centum per annum. Such interest shall accrue from date of deposit occurring after April 27, 1966, to and including date of withdrawal or date of breach of the immigration bond, whichever occurs first: Provided, That cash received by the Attorney General as security on an immigration bond, and deposited by him in the postal savings system prior to discontinuance of the system, shall accrue interest as provided in this section from the date such cash ceased to accrue interest under the system. Appropriations to the Treasury Department for interest on uninvested funds shall be available for payment of said interest.

(b) The interest accruing on cash received by the Attorney General as security on an immigration bond shall be subject to the same disposition as prescribed for the principal cash, except that interest accruing to the date of breach of the immigration bond shall be paid to the obligor on the bond.

(June 27, 1952, ch. 477, title II, ch. 9, §293, as added Pub. L. 91–313, §2, July 10, 1970, 84 Stat. 413.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Abolition of Immigration and Naturalization Service and Transfer of Functions

For abolition of Immigration and Naturalization Service, transfer of functions, and treatment of related references, see note set out under section 1551 of this title.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         119,357
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          17,359
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               133,048
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    254,815
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         413,507
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           419,771
<LOANS>                                      1,521,407
<ALLOWANCE>                                     20,901
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,564,623
<DEPOSITS>                                   2,181,721
<SHORT-TERM>                                    82,355
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             27,310
<LONG-TERM>                                     18,932
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        40,865
<OTHER-SE>                                     213,440
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               2,564,623
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 34,378
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                9,895
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 1,577
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                45,850
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              18,108
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,232
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           26,510
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      699
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   6
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 20,492
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 12,753
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      12,753
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,238
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.40
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.40
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.66
<LOANS-NON>                                     17,777
<LOANS-PAST>                                     2,097
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   486
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                 13,367
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                20,641
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      518
<RECOVERIES>                                        79
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               20,901
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            20,901
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
#### 1414.209-70 Examination of records by the Department of the Interior.

The CO shall insert the clause at 1452.215-70, Examination of Records by the Department of the Interior, in all contracts requiring the clause at FAR 52.215-2 Audit and Records, Negotiation, as prescribed in FAR 15.209(b).
ENCLOSURE 1 

State Authority 











ENCLOSURE 2 

SIP Completeness Checklist 
STATE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN COMPLETENESS 

CHECKLIST

ARIZONA REGIONAL HAZE STATE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN (SIP) 

1. SUBMITTAL LETTER FROM GOVERNOR/DESIGNEE 

See cover letter. 

2. EVIDENCE OF ADOPTION 

See cover letter. 

3. STATE LEGAL AUTHORITY FOR ADOPTION/IMPLEMENTATION 

See Enclosure 1. 

4. COMPLETE COPY OF APPLICABLE REGULATION 

Not Applicable.

 5. EVIDENCE THAT ARIZONA ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE ACT 

REQUIREMENTS (ARS '' 41-1021 through 1036) WERE MET FOR RULES 

See Appendix A-5 and A-10. 

6 EVIDENCE OF PUBLIC HEARING PER 40 CFR 51.102 

See Appendix A-18. 

7 PUBLIC COMMENTS AND AGENCY RESPONSE 

See Appendix A-18. 

8. IDENTIFICATION OF POLLUTANTS REGULATED BY RULE 

Sulfur dioxide (SO2), Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx), Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs), 

 and Particulate Matter (PM). 

9. IDENTIFICATION OF SOURCES/ATTAINMENT STATUS 

Not Applicable. 
10. WRITTEN SUMMARY OF RULE/RULE CHANGE 

See Chapter 5 and Appendix A-5 (Reasonably Attributable Visibility Impairment Rule); 

 Chapter 7 and Appendix A-7 (Draft WEB Trading Program Rule); Chapter 10 and 

 Appendix A-10 (Fire Rules). 

11. RULE CHANGES INDICATED BY UNDERLINING AND CROSS-OUTS 

See Appendix A-5 and Appendix A-10. 

12. RULES’ EFFECT ON EMISSIONS 

See Technical Support Document, Chapter 2. 

13 DEMONSTRATION THAT NAAQS, PSD INCREMENTS AND RFP ARE 

 PROTECTED 

Not Applicable. 

14. EVIDENCE THAT EMISSIONS LIMITATIONS ARE BASED ON CONTINUOUS 

 EMISSIONS REDUCTION TECHNOLOGY 

Not Applicable. 

15. MODELING SUPPORT 

See Technical Support Document, Chapter 1. 

16. IDENTIFICATION OF RULE SECTIONS CONTAINING EMISSION LIMITS, WORK 

PRACTICE STANDARDS, AND/OR RECORD KEEPING/REPORTING 

REQUIREMENTS 

See Appendix A-5, Appendix A-7, and Appendix A-10. 

17. COMPLIANCE/ENFORCEMENT STRATEGIES 

See Enclosure 3, Chapter 1. 

18 ECONOMIC TECHNICAL JUSTIFICATION FOR DEVIATION FROM EPA 

 POLICIES 

No known deviation from EPA policy. 
ENCLOSURE 3 

Arizona Regional Haze State Implementation Plan (SIP)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME (LOSS) AND THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEET.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001059364
<NAME> EAGLE PICHER HOLDINGS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          11,282
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  123,804
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,229
<INVENTORY>                                     94,841
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               256,764
<PP&E>                                         331,496
<DEPRECIATION>                                  86,701
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 776,019
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          215,317
<BONDS>                                        371,316
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          103,711
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            10
<OTHER-SE>                                      51,278
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   776,019
<SALES>                                        443,323
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               443,323
<CGS>                                          353,397
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  353,397
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                72,609
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              24,719
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 22,918
<INCOME-TAX>                                    13,750
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              9,168
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     9,168
<EPS-BASIC>                                       3.41
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     3.41


</TABLE>
Second Department,

Mat, 1959 *

(May 18, 1959)

#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Thomas Kling, Appellant.

Motion for reargument of motion to dispense with printing and for other relief denied. Present — Wenzel, Acting P. J., Beldock, Murphy, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ.
#### 1333.215 Contract clauses.

Alternate I of FAR 52.233-1, *Disputes,* may be used at the discretion of the contracting officer.
Exhibit 32.1


               CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF
                 FINANCIAL OFFICER FEDERAL MORTGAGE CORPORATION
                              OF PUERTO RICO, INC.
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Federal Mortgage Corporation of
Puerto Rico, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September
30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael Schumacher, Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
the best of my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



 /s/ Michael Schumacher
-----------------------------------
Michael Schumacher
President, Chief Executive Officer,
 Treasurer, and Chief Financial Officer
November 17, 2006





                                       13
### /rPARTMENTO F • ANS^'ORWtO N • ' •jrCPERATiON S SERVE D JANUAR

Y31 , 201 1 i '^.N ii ! P 2 ^ 3 8

U.S . DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N

OFFIC EO FHEARING S WASHINGTON , D C I NTH EMATTE RO F FLIGHTSTA RAIRCRAF T SERVICES , INC . FA A DOCKE T No . CP10GL001 3 (Civi l Penalty Action ) DM S No . FAA-2010-107 7 

### ORDE R O F DISMISSA L O n Octobe r

26 , 2010 , th e Federa l Aviatio nAdministratio n(hereinafte r referre dt o a s "Complainant" ) file daComplaint
. O nOctobe r 6 , 2010 , Flightstar

Aircraf t Services , Inc . (hereinafte r

referre dt o a s "Respondent" ) file dit s Answer . O nJanuar y 26 , 2011 , Responden t

withdre w it s reques t

for ahearing , citin g settlement
. 1 4 C.F.R . § 13.21 5 states : "A t any tim e befor e o r

durin g ahearing , a

nagenc y attorne y ma y withdra w acomplain t o r party ma y withdra w areques t fo r ahearin g withou t th e consen t

of th e administrativ e la w judge
. I f a nagenc y attorne y withdraw s th e complain t

o r aparty withdraw s th e reques t fo r ahearin g an dth e answer , th e administrativ e la w judg e shal l dismis s th e proceeding s unde r thi s subpart withprejudice. " WHEREFORE , Respondent' s Withdrawa l o f Reques t fo r Hearin g havin g bee n rea dan dconsidered , i t

i s ORDERE D a s follows : 1 . Respondent' s Withdrawa l of it s Reques t

fo r Hearin g b e an di s hereb y granted ; an d

### T^^fflfWlffii^ ^

2 . Thi s proceedin g b e an di s hereb y dismisse dwittpj^uf a S O ORDERED . 

# ^ACQ^ C Richar d C
. Goodwi n Administrativ e LawJudg e Attaclimen t - Servic e Lis t



### Ik
.FA A Docke t Nos . CP1OGLOO11 , CP10GL0012 , CP l OGLO O 1 3 (Civi l Penalty Action ) SERVIC ELIS T ORIGINA L& ON ECOP Y Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W . Washington , D C 2059 1 Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC-430 , Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit e 2WI000 '

ON ECOP Y Gregory S . Winton , Respondent' s Counse l Th e Aviatio n La w Firm On e Researc hCourt , Suit e 45 0 Rockville , M D 2085 0 TEL : 301-294-855 0 FAX : 301-294-252 5 Glen n L . Brown , Complainant' s Counse l Senio r Attorney , Offic e o f

th e Regiona l Counse l Great Lake s Region , AGL- 7 Federal Aviatio n Administratio n 230 0 Eas t Devo n Avenu e DesPlaines,I L6001 8 TEL : 847-294-706 3 FAX : 847-294-749 8 Th e Honorabl e Richar dC . Goodwin , Administrativ e La w Judg e U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportatio n Offic e o f Hearings , M-20 , 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E . Eas t Building , Groun dFloor , Roo mEl2-32 0 Washington , D C 2059 0 TEL : Attorney-Adviso r 202-366-213 9 Legal Assistan t

202-366-512 1 FAX : 202-366-753 6

' Servic e wa s b y U.S . Mail
. Fo

r servic e i n perso no r b y expedite dcourier , us e th e followin g address : Federa

l Aviatio n Administration, 60

0 Independenc

e Avenue , S.W. , Wilbu

r Wrigh t Building—Suit

e 2WI0O0 , Washington

, D C 20591 ; Attention : Hearin

g Docke t Clerk , AGC-430.