P.1 

OAR Box 1790 

Prepped by Keeia Richards 

Document Number: 

224) ll-F-13 

Docket Number: 

A-90-37 

Printed 10/31/2008 12:43:17 PM Sheet 224 of 250 
P.2 

06/05/2001 10:39 91349*10122 ECR PAGE 02 

A-SD-37 

orrxci or 

* « -UOPLfcTOlT a_TF42_J 

vtf/yj 

„ ,,/W> S-.OArtfv 

•03FICATIQJI BO. 

» 0 . 

•man op >AI2M _». (xne_e__iiB nuu*ixxm_ asm) 

« « FAX ran, (aoa) 3M-72ai _ (|| M ;|N| ( ^ 

tfUBXH 
P.3 

0G/05/2001 10:38 9194640122 

' ***'*** .. . m- .-m ..a-"-*.*, ttr-lmmrt. UM HnJBajaj 

ECR 

f W I 

PAGE 03 

PACE I. 

Oepirtment of Energy 

Washington. PO SOStiS 

FAX COVES SHEET 

OFFICE Of ENVIRONMENTAL AN/ILY8IS ft 

6USTAINABU DEVELOPMENT 

OFFICE OF POLICY 

BEJUItTMENT OF ENERGY 

1000 INDEPENDENCE AVENUE, SW 

W.ASaHlNGTON, U.C. 20085

 r

~~ 

TEL (203>6882Oai 

TAX (802) 6SS-2062 

NUMB2B OF PAGES. 

(INCLUpiNa COVER) 

Ici^ Vifr-, 0*6" 

PHOMIS NUMBER: 

• -FA* NUMBER; 

1MOM. fr^-lti, flS/fr]^ 

FHONS NUMBER;, 

TKH NUMBER: *S"(fr& ^^Ofa'LS' 

ME&SAU&'. 

- * • 
P.4 

0B/05/2001 10:38 9194B40122 

•iiw**' ev^-m-wv 

ECR 

TH*-

PAGE 04 

PAGE a 

Department of Energy 

WMWngto*-. bC 2081ft 

March.), jggfi 

MKMORA IS IJUM. KOK: Bill Tyndall, OV-K 

FROM: 

Clirli Wall. OMn 

HoBcr Murria. I-OrmWft? 

Tb» atUr.:hti:l requoila for specific ohnngUH to U»« Novombar 16, 1B04, draf. "New 

Saute* Kovlow Hftftrm" 1* hereby pi*ovir.(l**l A . i-o.<|UcmitsH. Due to Ute short timo 

available io *|>r-3p*i_ thesa raquasto. KnrUu DobrianaUy nnd J afre not aUtsmptihu Lo 

c--nfiuUd,il'*e our effort-* and (ire »ubn.lUM)j; our pioegs fiCrparttU-.y. Duu Ui her huruk 

WorJtlaid, Lciriiia'a iufamii-non may nm. he CHiiipkittid hy Friday, nw dn 1 recall l.or 

]>!-timi«« thai it would bo. 

I dlrl tii-tuMisi! i-fliults by Friday, onrt here thoy »r<u. 1*11 nco you noxt ')\i&ad&y. 
P.5 

B 6 / 8 5/2BBll , » : gg 1

^

l ^"««BJg WIWWat0 0 

ECR 

TOCPAGE 05 

PR5E 3 

ijpcdfle D0 3 Request for Changes to tho November is, 1984 Draft "Now So0n* 

IAEFI 

On ptf» 176, flftK line, add the wo.sj Veonfiold*1 after "ftert". At tH. end of -

that ;;iars<jrapb, add: 

"U-awover, a source feeing: N8R due lo feeonwuction or moflincnLjon 

may be cpn«.lr«ined by tils, fuel and/or technology coniidoratiwiB fft>m 

doing

 wKat tho best eoiilroUvd aource in tea diss or catistor/ had done 

Thertfor-», EPA requaaU teimuobt, en whether or not tha phrase "in ilo* 

clHsfl 07 Mcegory' should be interpreted te moaft "similar sou roe* when 

•LAI5R io being1 determined for "brnwnlliild" sourtos." 

l3n pii|jo 178, eliminate the fact templeto sontence. 

BACT 

•*-

On pmtr. 109, last two lineg, changfl "air pQlkillon abtttafiinoni" to emission 

limit* turn." Oil page 100, 4th .line, ellirlnnto "Jntornalixln_ the coat* or nir 

.(tollutiou prelection." Alao, in linos 7 & 8, chn-n/pri "airpollution" tu ''caninsiori." 

Ineart on. paffa 1^5, ju»t prior ta point 2 tho following* 

However, sumu stakuholdtiri bollouo thac the "Cop down" BACT procaeB 

|j.)li,ces undue emphasis on the -most stringent (snd costly) control option. 

ifherefoTTa. while the "top duwn" process Is proposed herein and 

i:>x)>]alned boJow, EPA Books oommenV on olcamatWo processes vh bruin 

ao Initial presumption .(pr a ditToronl ii'*e»umpUori) would bo used. Such 

•lornmobu should addrtEK in pflrtic.il'.i'-ihe ftctorfl to bo considered in 

i:ho BACT ssUetion prosofli*. and how tiuch factor* would be balanced in 

uDlBctire a spedfic BACT. 

QP poiF»* 167 and lflS (and evorywhere due.In the propose,]) chhORo "air 

po]'Uiti*in" and "pollution" to

 - omissions.'' 

Innort, vm page 174 after the flrti, ttnccmpUac) pnra_raph, the fuHowinir: 

'Anyone 8ub-miitin„ e co-rninebt i*ooom,mcn-iuig an approach to BAC T 

•lifl'erent from ''top down" should U!BU supply examples addressing tho 

Iwo points do»tr*b*<i abnvo." 

Chise I Araaf 

On putfi *JftH, linos M-11, delate "ostabli*.) nr « national KOMV and. sube-tuto 

.,-,.. -^...r,,, ^ * |W|,|l«|l|U|-UH«til««|-»l1«««" l"**"»"" ,,1, r "*" " '"* 
P.6 

86/05/2001 10=38 9194840122. 

ECR 

f-HK* 

PAGE 06 

PACE 4 

V«qvurs reasonable progress toward « naiiutidl goal of. 

Oo pug- 29(1, linos 14-19. delate the indicated -sonlance. Substitute: 

'Given that the applicant ha6 provided iocram-nurolntod pollutant 

•coneai--tration estimates, and aifftuijiintr that.tlie FLM m^y. in some casoB. 

deiriiru further infotmotton or analyaiu of the affects of Uuiae concon era lions an 

AQRVs. the question arises whether or not it is the applicant's responsibility 

to iu|;ply Much information. VA'A helto-e* <h*t oooperatJert between ihe 

applicant, TIM and permit authority in dowm.itiiog impacts en AQRVs is in 

the iniaorasfe of all. Dut BPA lioBituten w roc-Wire information or analysis of tho 

upplicsunt beyond increment-related air quality bee&uaa the status pl.eas tho 

liu!*dor.- of demonstrating an ndvorse effect on tho VtM. Tbia 18BUO Ifl dfflcuasod 

furihtir under "b. Scope and timing ef tho FLM'a demonstration" after which 

uurtimeni on ihe issue ts sol.oiled. 

On page ?0C, fast paragraph, strike all ro)|evin_: "Further ..." 

On peffo &08 after ihe. first (incompJotu) parnfp-aph inaert tho foHowinfci 

"Wliil(! „J»A believes that the idontificulinn of A(jRVs is the W,M'e 

raojjoiuubiltty, thi HtKluLfl j-tflBltfnS 8 consultative role to EPA in the 

identiflation of adverse oflfcets on AQftVs (the Act, section l«5(d)(,-J(B». Thi a 

propftBu.1 Implies an informal, taitci-b>-i-i*iHu approach by 1SFA to that 

wnBultiavti ve role. However, some atehoholdai a have suggested that EPA'«s role 

be defli-jed more o*plitut|y. Thoso etHko]>olcfoi--> point out that FLMs arc single 

iesu-a (iilvocates in the PSD porn-it-, rnviow process While EPA hat- broader 

n,sj*on*Jaibiliti«s to the souerul public tntorom. They also point out that nn 

Important aepast of the Class 1 area prol«i-tion Issuo iii MilBLsnea io the 

pcrtflittTjrv? authority in making Judgement* on FLM claims that an AQltV 

would tie adversely affected. Therefore, EI-*,*-, requests conuneui on whether 

sud how the SPA consultation on ndverpe AQRV impacts could ba moixflipl*.—( In parririilsr, HP* toqueBtn cojinncnt on polanljal guidelines which 

wou)d Uo ifensrally applicable, to adverse AQRV impacc dotonulnatione. 

On ptbgd SOB 3,t the end ofthe first Uncoixiploia) purngrciph, Insert tlie fulUiwlng: 

•'Whcitht|'r or not eueh identillod 4Q11V**. would bo ndvoreeiy affected by « 

proposal now or Uiodifjad tfoUi-cc roust ultimately be decided by th» permit 

aatharitr bahed on tho demonftr^iiori of i.lit> JO.M and guidance provided by 

EI'A in to consultiva copiidty. As montloiiftd enrlior. BPA swnkB cammo>u on 

fcka fo-<i\aVia] eeopo of such cuncmlt-vn ffuiili-^iicc." 

On pare SO*, lines 10 & J)., change "must bo i^npleUd" to "may be appropriouj." 

On pa_o _i2,o.i«i: b-afor* point d. ini-cri the followi,.,****. 

,...„ . Mil \\\><.-w "a *«ir.iiiii.i-iillil (

,l|1|l,r,OI»Ulll«wll_"HlU*-k<'lt„B>:l»*WH.I»)el la.a,Ml. , ..Ill ' 
P.7 

0 6 / 0 5 /200i^0 :38i?5!w 91S4040 D lgj(ERrfl)<36o O 

ECR 

FAX' 

PAGE 07 

PflQE G 

"A Mtiea'tien arises aa to whether 12l»A, in its voneultive rolo, should provide 

avaiJirlue iiilunnatlon on tho accuracy or aUUe of development ofrnodols which 

ara r,*.-t covered by the Guideline an Air Quiil-Hy Model a. EPA seeks oauinn.nl 

on uhdther and how descripciona of no))-.guideline models might be 

Bupplumented by EPA with Inform*tion which could assist tho permitting 

authurfty te evaluate the result* of t-uch model*." 

On patfc 3115, point (1), chance "substantial dofurcnoo" to ''reasonable conbido-Htlon," 

Cn pug* 32*;, delete the nrst compleUi pi*,) Hgrnph. mid delate the wprd "Noveitholoa*" 

ftont tlie hnj; Inning- of ihe followta* paragjiiph. 

On pogo Sill, line 6. change "dclorn-iinotion" (o 'M(*monatr*ation." Also, in line t», 

charge "fine'linaff" to "demonstration." 

On page 32li, £d from last lii-s, chj-njtr* "t-oncomr," to "a finding hy the permiuinH 

authority."' 

On paga iD'2(l, l,1ne 4, placo n period nflnr "disputus". Continue ihe paragraph as 

fellows. 

'The •j-.'-plieent niuy ehoouc to address the l.-M-MV nontBma through initigwuvo 

nui'btiui'es prior to a de^ormicuitiuti by the permit-ting Authority that on AllHV 

WOUld bo Adversely affected. thu« olii?i7nntintf the need fbr kuch a' 

d<9UhrnrJmiUon. HdwOver, the prtiposod miiigniittn policy should not ho 

coniatriiiid to i-equirn any <a*ltl_3tloQ by tho 'iittxlfcimt imlDe* an advwip AQJIV 

fi.ndi.ng- is made fay the permitLbii; aulhdHty." 

Op pilge 35J7. l)*,**Fbro point a, insert (.he following; 

•"The Wi;'A ssoks comment, on Mitt condition* ^hioh would or would not Jvtulfy. 

peat construction monitoring in Olas* 1 I-II-I-HS by n newly eonfltruolod or 

n>ed_fi«<il Source, and on tha appropriate typo rind duration of audi monitoring. 

On pa_« SflO. line* 13-16, dolote the t-oixtenw bo/sjinnliig "Such..". 

On pftW 331. II068 10-1.3, daloto tho awtanca beginning 'The FI,M«-..'"* (Note: AQftV 

sigidQcancti levels would be part of art adverse OHCICL aeuirmination. EPA h«e *. 

conaiuluve role In ouch deierrainetJotti. Thorufuro. Nigm/lcnnea lev*) solp.i-.tion dooisnot 

rest solely wit|i Qie FLM*.) 

,.„.. , ,1,1. ,i,MliiH>llMltn-illHUS|llll*.| ^..i,.TM ^