alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP)

Fiscal Monitoring Instrument (FMI): 

FFY 2016

California Department of Education (CDE)

Please note the following abbreviations may be used in the Fiscal Monitoring Instrument

(FMI): 

FFY – Federal fiscal year

IDEA – Individuals with Disabilities Education Act 

LEA – local educational agency

MFS – maintenance of State financial support

OMB – Office of Management and Budget 

OIG – Office of the Inspector General

SEA – State education agency

Uniform Guidance – Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles and Audit 

Requirements for Federal Awards codified in 2 CFR Part 200

Scope of Monitoring:

OSEP’s Fiscal Monitoring in 2017 examined LEA Allocations. In conducting the monitoring,

OSEP reviewed information from FFYs 2014, 2015 and 2016, including State-submitted 

documentation and other available information. OSEP conducted interviews with State staff via 

phone and electronic media. 
California Department of Education (CDE), page 2 of 2

IDEA Part B

Summary of Monitoring Criteria

Monitoring Area 1, IDEA Part B: LEA ALLOCATIONS

The IDEA Part B 611 and 619 funds are to assist States, and through them, LEAs, in providing special education and related 

services to children with disabilities. States are required to distribute any section 611 and section 619 funds that the State does not 

reserve for State-level activities to eligible LEAs for use in accordance with the IDEA. States’ correct allocation of IDEA funds to 

LEAs, consistent with statutory formulas, is critical in helping to ensure that IDEA Part B funds are used appropriately for the 

purposes for which they were intended. 

Criterion Number Description

Noncompliance 

identified? Applicable Requirements

Criterion 1.1 The SEA distributes IDEA section 611 and section 619 

allocations to eligible LEAs based upon the correct 

formula for calculating base payments. 

No 34 CFR §§ 300.705(a)-

(b)(1), 300.815-300.816(a)

Criterion 1.2 The SEA calculates LEA base payment adjustments 

consistent with IDEA requirements. 

No 34 CFR §§ 300.705(b)(2), 

300.815, 300.816(b); 34 

CFR Part 76 Subpart H

Criterion 1.3 The SEA allocates remaining section 611 and/or section 

619 funds to LEAs, including charter school LEAs, based 

on population and poverty consistent with IDEA 

requirements. 

No 34 CFR §§300.705(b)(3)

, 300.816(c) and (d), 

Criterion 1.4 The SEA ensures that IDEA funds are properly allocated 

to IDEA through subgrants to eligible charter school LEAs 

that open or significantly expand their enrollment.

No 34 CFR §§76.792 –76.793

Criterion 1.5 The SEA reallocates section 611 and/or section 619 funds 

to eligible LEAs, including charter school LEAs, consistent 

with IDEA requirements. 

No 34 CFR §§300.705(c) and 

300.817. 

Criterion 1.6 The SEA ensures that FFY 2015 section 619 allocations 

were made consistent with IDEA requirements although

the FFY 2015 allocations to States for section 619 grants 

were below the 1997 appropriation level.

No 34 CFR §300.816
#### In the Matter of the Final Accounting of Roy H. Glover, Deceased (as rendered by Helen A. Glover, as Executrix of His Will), as Executor of Cornelius F. Kelley, Deceased, and the Intermediate Accounting of Guaranty Trust Company of New York, as Successor Executor of Cornelius F. Kelley, Deceased. Frances K. Wood et al., Appellants; Morgan Guaranty Trust Company of New York, as Successor Executor of Cornelius F. Kelley, Deceased, et al., Respondents.

In a proceeding by executors for the judicial settlement of their accounts and for a judicial construction of Article Seventh of testator’s will, two of his legatees, Frances K. Wood (formerly known as Frances Keresey) and Cornelius Florman, his daughter and grandson, respectively, and John C. Wood, as successor trustee of a trust for the benefit of said daughter, appeal from so much of an order of the Surrogate’s Court, Nassau County, dated January 12, 1960, as is contained in its third decretal paragraph and as adjudges that said Article *“*does not effect the cancellation of the indebtedness ” of $106,087.23 owing to the testator by the “ trust for the benefit ” of said daughter or the indebtedness of $11,954.43 owing to the testator by the “trust for the benefit” of said grandson. Order insofar as appealed from reversed on the law and the facts, without costs; and petition, insofar as it seeks a judicial construction of said Article Seventh of the testator’s will, granted to the further extent of construing said Article so as to effect the cancellation of the said indebtedness owing to the testator by the trust for the benefit of said daughter and so as to effect the cancellation of the said indebtedness owing to the testator by the trust for the benefit of said grandson. Findings of fact which may be inconsistent herewith are reversed and new findings are made as indicated herein. In our opinion, the language of Article Seventh of the will, construed in the light of all the circumstances of this case, includes within its purview the debts charged against said trusts on testator’s books (ef. *Dibble*V. *Bichardson,*171 N. Y. 131; *Fidelity Trust Co.*v. *Service Laundry Co.,*T60 Term. 57). Beldock, Acting P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur.
AircraftDate By: DetailsBird 1 4/14/2014Atlanta Hobby (DJI Authorized)Replaced damaged PC board (crash - see 4/16 below)Bird 1 4/16/2014 DJI Factory Service Replace battery 1, battery 2 and charger (Warranty) - Battery sensor failureBird 1 5/3/2014 Owner Basic calibration, advanced IMU calibrationBird 2 5/18/2014 Owner Software/firmware update - Gimble issue fixed w/ jumper reset Frm 3.0Bird 1 5/18/2014 Owner Software/firmware updateBird 1 7/26/2014 Owner Noticed slight squeek during flights but no moter heating. applied 108 oilBird 1 1/31/2015 Owner Flop on landing, damaged CF props, replaced w/ standard propsBird 2 3/26/2015 Owner Software/firmware update 3.12Bird 1 3/26/2015 Owner Software/firmware update 3.2Bird 2 4/5/2015 Owner Prop replace due to hard landing (tree)Bird 2 4/15/2015 Owner Set CL in firmwareBird 1 4/15/2015 Owner Confirm CL is set in firmwareMaintenance Repairs and Notations:
# Criteria

# QtrYr1Data

# QtrYr2Data

# Title

# Note

# Quarterly

# Cum Quarterly

# SubYr1Data

# SubYr2Data

# Subsidized

# UnsubYr1Data

# UnsubYr2Data

# Unsubsidized

# PlusYr1Data

# PlusYr2Data

# Plus

# TotalYr1Data

# TotalYr2Data

# Total
#### Morris L. Ciner, Appellant v Theresa Maluagna et al., Respondents.

— In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, plaintiff appeals from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated March 7, 1978, which denied his motion for leave to amend the *ad damnum*clause of the complaint, and (2) so much of a further order of the same court, dated July 3,1978, as, upon reargument, adhered to the original determination. Appeal from the order dated March 7, 1978 dismissed as academic. That order was superseded by the order granting reargument. Order dated July 3, 1978 reversed insofar as appealed from, and, upon reargument, motion for leave to amend the *ad damnum*clause granted. Plaintiff is awarded one bill of $50 costs and disbursements to cover both appeals. It was an abuse of discretion to deny plaintiff leave to amend the *ad damnum*clause (see *Wagner v Huntington Hosp.,*65 AD2d 771). Titone, J. P., Suozzi, O’Connor and Lazer, JJ., concur.
#### John F. Bopp et al., Respondents-Appellants, v. State of New York, Appellant-Respondent.

(Claim No. 37655.)

Judgment modified, on the law and the facts, upon the authority of *Selig*v. *State of New York*(10 N Y 2d 34); *Crear*v. *State of New York*(2 A D 2d 735); *National Biscuit Co.*v. *State of New York*(12 A D 2d 998, vacat. and mod. 14 A D 2d 729, affd. 11 N Y 2d 743, cert. den. 370 U. S. 924), so as to reduce the award to $4,175 and appropriate interest and, as so modified, affirmed, without costs. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds, Taylor and Aulisi, JJ., concur.
### §§1001 to 1006. Repealed. June 27, 1952, ch. 477, title IV, §403(a)(42), 66 Stat. 280, eff. Dec. 24, 1952

Section 1001, act Oct. 14, 1940, ch. 876, title III, §701, as added Mar. 27, 1942, ch. 199, title X, §1001, 56 Stat. 182; amended Dec. 22, 1944, ch. 662, §1, 58 Stat. 886; Dec. 28, 1945, ch. 590, §1(c)(1), 59 Stat. 658, related to exceptions from certain requirements of naturalization of persons serving in the armed forces during World War II. See section 1440 of this title.

Section 1002, act Oct. 14, 1940, ch. 876, title III, §702, as added Mar. 27, 1942, ch. 199, title X, §1001, 56 Stat. 182; amended Dec. 22, 1944, ch. 662, §2, 58 Stat. 887, related to alien serving outside of jurisdiction of naturalization court. See section 1440 of this title.

Section 1003, act Oct. 14, 1940, ch. 876, title III, §703, as added Mar. 27, 1942, ch. 199, title X, §1001, 56 Stat. 183, related to waiver of notice to commissioner in case of alien enemy. See section 1440 of this title.

Section 1004, act Oct. 14, 1940, ch. 876, title III, §704, as added Mar. 27, 1942, ch. 199, title X, §1001, 56 Stat. 183, related to persons excepted from former subchapter. See section 1440 of this title.

Section 1005, act Oct. 14, 1940, ch. 876, title III, §705, as added Mar. 27, 1942, ch. 199, title X, §1001, 56 Stat. 183, related to forms, rules and regulations. See section 1440 of this title.

Section 1006, act Oct. 14, 1940, ch. 876, title III, §706, as added Dec. 28, 1945, ch. 590, §1(c)(2), 59 Stat. 658, related to time of service limitation. See section 1440 of this title.
Exhibit 99.2
                                                                    ------------
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Current Report on Form 10-Q of Claire's Stores, Inc.
(the  "Company")  for  the  quarterly period ended May 3, 2003 as filed with the
Securities  and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ira D.
Kaplan,  Chief  Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Sec.  1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002,  that:

(1)  The  Report  fully  complies  with  the requirements of  section  13(a)  or
15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents,  in  all  material
respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results of operations of the Company.


                                             /s/  Ira  D.  Kaplan
                                             --------------------
                                                  Ira  D.  Kaplan
                                                  Chief  Financial  Officer
                                                  June  16,  2003
### §304. Recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral decisions and awards; reciprocity

Arbitral decisions or awards made in the territory of a foreign State shall, on the basis of reciprocity, be recognized and enforced under this chapter only if that State has ratified or acceded to the Inter-American Convention.

(Added Pub. L. 101–369, §1, Aug. 15, 1990, 104 Stat. 449.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective upon the entry into force of the Inter-American Convention on International Commercial Arbitration of January 30, 1975, with respect to the United States (Oct. 27, 1990), see section 3 of Pub. L. 101–369, set out as a note under section 301 of this title.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Federal Screw Works (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Quarterly
Report"), I, W.T. ZurSchmiede, Jr., Chairman of the Board, Chief Financial
Officer, Secretary and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         (1) The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or
78o(d)); and

         (2) The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.


April 14, 2004

                                   /s/ W.T. ZurSchmiede, Jr.
                                   ---------------------------------------------
                                   W.T. ZurSchmiede, Jr., Chairman of the Board,
                                   Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of
                                   Federal Screw Works
### Part C—Maintenance of Security-related Technology
FORM 10-Q

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

[x]	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2007

OR

[ ]	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ____________ to ___________

Commission file number 0-827

EMPIRE STATE BUILDING ASSOCIATES L.L.C.

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

A New York Limited Liability Company	13-6084254

(State or other jurisdiction of 	(I.R.S. Employer

incorporation or organization)	Identification No.)

60 East 42nd Street, New York, New York

(Address of principal executive offices)

10165

(Zip Code)

(212) 687-8700

(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

N/A

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [ X ].  No [   ].

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act) Yes [  ]  No [ X ] .

PART I.  FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.  Financial Statements.

Empire State Building Associates L.L.C.

(A Limited Liability Company)

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

(Unaudited)
Editorial Note on Part 842
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 842 appear at 81 FR 83688, Nov. 22, 2016.

§ 842.126 When authorized. Make advance payments only where all of the following exist: ( a ) The potential claimant could file a valid claim for property damage or personal injury under the Military Claims, Foreign Claims, or National Guard Claims Acts.
( b ) The potential claimant has an immediate need amounting to a hardship for food, shelter, medical or burial expenses, or other necessities. In the case of a commercial enterprise, severe financial loss or bankruptcy will result if the Air Force does not make an advance payment.
( c ) Other resources for such needs are not reasonably available.
( d ) The potential claim equals or exceeds the amount of the advance payment.
( e ) The recipient signs as advance payment agreement.
[55 FR 2809, Jan. 29, 1990. Redesignated and amended at 81 FR 83701, Nov. 22, 2016]
13.102 Source list. ( a ) Contracting officers should use the System for Award Management (see subpart 4.11) via *https://www.sam.gov* as their primary sources of vendor information. Offices maintaining additional vendor source files or listings should identify the status of each source (when the status is made known to the contracting office) in the following categories: ( 1 ) Small business.
( 2 ) Small disadvantaged business.
( 3 ) Women-owned small business concern, including economically disadvantaged women-owned small business concerns and women-owned small business concerns eligible under the Women-owned Small Business (WOSB) Program.
( 4 ) HUBZone small business.
( 5 ) Service-disabled veteran-owned small business.
( 6 ) Veteran-owned small business.
( b ) The status information may be used as the basis to ensure that small business concerns are provided the maximum practicable opportunities to respond to solicitations issued using simplified acquisition procedures.
[62 FR 64917, Dec. 9, 1997, as amended at 63 FR 58593, Oct. 30, 1998; 68 FR 56673, Oct. 1, 2003; 76 FR 18308, Apr. 1, 2011; 77 FR 188, Jan. 3, 2012; 78 FR 37678, June 21, 2013; 79 FR 43582, July 25, 2014; 83 FR 48697, Sept. 26, 2018]
#### 1333.203 Applicability.

The designee authorized to determine that the application of the Contract Disputes Act of 1978 to a contract with an international organization or a subsidiary body of that organization would not be in the public interest is set forth in CAM 1301.70.
14.407-2 Apparent clerical mistakes. ( a ) Any clerical mistake, apparent on its face in the bid, may be corrected by the contracting officer before award. The contracting officer first shall obtain from the bidder a verification of the bid intended. Examples of apparent mistakes are— ( 1 ) Obvious misplacement of a decimal point;
( 2 ) Obviously incorrect discounts (for example, 1 percent 10 days, 2 percent 20 days, 5 percent 30 days);
( 3 ) Obvious reversal of the price f.o.b. destination and price f.o.b. origin; and
( 4 ) Obvious mistake in designation of unit.
( b ) Correction of the bid shall be effected by attaching the verification to the original bid and a copy of the verification to the duplicate bid. Correction shall not be made on the face of the bid; however, it shall be reflected in the award document.
( c ) Correction of bids submitted by electronic data interchange shall be effected by including in the electronic solicitation file the original bid, the verification request, and the bid verification.
[48 FR 42171, Sept. 19, 1983. Redesignated and amended at 60 FR 34738, July 3, 1995]
MEMORANDUM

TO: 

FROM:

The Director

Office ofState and Grantee Relations

SUBJECT: ·

Adam Schott

Delegated Authority to Perform the Functions and Duties of the 

Assistant Secretary for Elementary and Secondary Education

Redelegation ofAuthority for Certain Waivers and Determinations under the CRRSA 

Act and the ARP Act

I. DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY

Under the authority vested in my position by a delegation from the Secretary, delegation 

EA/ES/104, certified on February 2, 2022, I delegate to you, or to anyone serving for you in an 

acting capacity or delegated the authority to perform the functions and duties of your position, 

the following authorities:

A. the authority to waive maintenance of effort requirements under Division M,section 317 of 

theCoronavirusResponse andReliefSupplementalAppropriations(CRRSA) Act, 2021, Pub.

L. No. 116-260 (December 27, 2020);

B. the authority to waive maintenance of effort requirements under section 2004(a)(2) of 

the American Rescue Plan (ARP) Act of 2021, Pub. L. No. 117-2 (March 11, 2021); 

and

C. the authority to determine whether a local educational agency has demonstrated an 

exceptional or uncontrollable circumstance undersection 2004(c)(2)(D) ofthe ARP Act.

Unless otherwise noted in future delegations ofauthority, amendments to the authorities 

delegated herein are included in the scope ofthis delegation.

II. RESERVATIONS

Unless otherwise noted in existing or future delegations ofauthority, the following are not 

delegated:

A. the authority to sign documentsfor publication in the Federal Register;

B. the authority to appoint, and fix compensation of, members ofadvisory councils; and

C. unless otherwise provide by law, the authority to submit reportsto Congress or the President.

III. REDELEGATION
No further redelegation is authorized.

IV. CERTIFICATION AND EFFECTIVE DATE

This redelegation is effective upon certification by the Department's Principal Delegations 

Control Officer. This redelegation supersedes redelegation ES/ES/105 certified on April 

15, 2022.

I hereby ratify actions within the scope of this redelegation taken by the addressee prior to 

the date of certification.

Adam Schott

 s/

OGC Clearance and Date: Debbie Friendly; 8/24/2023

Date Certified: 8/24/2023

Control Number: ES/ES/113

Delegations Control Officer: Jim Clemmens
MEMORANDUM

TO: Stephanie Valentine

FROM: Chief Data Officer

Office of Planning, Evaluation and Policy Development

SUBJECT: Redelegation of Authority for Notices of Proposed Data Collection Activities

DELEGATION

Under the authority vested in me by a delegation from the Assistant Secretary for Planning, 

Evaluation and Policy Development, delegation ED/EDC/09, certified on March 11, 2020, I 

delegate to you the authority to approve and sign Federal Register notices of proposed data 

collection activities.

Unless otherwise specified in future delegations of authority, amendments to the authorities 

delegated herein are included within the scope of this delegation.

RESERVATIONS

None.

REDELEGATION

You may not redelegate the authority delegated to you. 

CERTIFICATION AND EFFECTIVE DATE

This delegation is effective upon certification by the Department’s Principal Delegations Control 

Officer, and it supersedes all previous delegations and re-delegations of these authorities.

I ratify actions within the scope of this delegation taken by you prior to the date of certification.

Greg Fortelny

(signed)

OGC Concurrence:

Debbie Friendly; 

4/13/2020

Certified Date: 

4/14/2020

Delegations 

Control Officer: 

Jim Clemmens

Control Number: 

EDC/EDC/11

CC
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 29, 2017

No. 04-17-00704-CV

Russell AMSBERRY,

Appellant

v.

Alejandra SALAZAR,

Appellee

From the 37th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2011-CI-17196

The Honorable Angelica Jimenez, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The trial court signed an Order Confirming Award & Final Judgment on July 13, 2017. 

Appellant filed a timely motion for reconsideration on August 11, 2017. Therefore, the notice of 

appeal was due to be filed on October 11, 2017. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1(a). A motion for 

extension of time to file the notice of appeal was due on October 26, 2017. See TEX. R. APP. P.

26.3. Although appellant filed a notice of appeal within the fifteen-day grace period allowed by 

Rule 26.3, he did not file a motion for extension of time. 

A motion for extension of time is necessarily implied when an appellant, acting in good 

faith, files a notice of appeal beyond the time allowed by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 

26.1 but within the fifteen-day grace period provided by Rule 26.3 for filing a motion for 

extension of time. See Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997) (construing the 

predecessor to Rule 26). However, the appellant must offer a reasonable explanation for failing 

to file the notice of appeal in a timely manner. See id.; TEX. R. APP. P. 26.3, 10.5(b)(1)(C). 

We, therefore, ORDER appellant to file, within fifteen days from the date of this order, a 

response presenting a reasonable explanation for failing to file the notice of appeal in a timely 

manner. If appellant fails to respond within the time provided, the appeal will be dismissed. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c).

_________________________________

Karen Angelini, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 29th day of November, 2017.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
### §7311. Establishment

There is established a commission to be known as the "Commission on 21st Century Production Agriculture" (in this subchapter referred to as the "Commission").

(Pub. L. 104–127, title I, §181, Apr. 4, 1996, 110 Stat. 938.)