alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §1778. Vulnerability and threat assessment

#### (a) Study

The Under Secretary of Homeland Security for Border and Transportation Security, in consultation with the Under Secretary of Homeland Security for Science and Technology and the Under Secretary of Homeland Security for Information Analysis and Infrastructure Protection, shall study the technology, equipment, and personnel needed to address security vulnerabilities within the United States for each field office of the Bureau of Customs and Border Protection that has responsibility for any portion of the United States borders with Canada and Mexico. The Under Secretary shall conduct follow-up studies at least once every 5 years.

#### (b) Report to Congress

The Under Secretary shall submit a report to Congress on the Under Secretary's findings and conclusions from each study conducted under subsection (a) together with legislative recommendations, as appropriate, for addressing any security vulnerabilities found by the study.

#### (c) Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated to the Department of Homeland Security Directorate of Border and Transportation Security such sums as may be necessary for fiscal years 2006 through 2011 to carry out any such recommendations from the first study conducted under subsection (a).

(Pub. L. 109–13, div. B, title III, §301, May 11, 2005, 119 Stat. 316.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the REAL ID Act of 2005, and also as part of the Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Act for Defense, the Global War on Terror, and Tsunami Relief, 2005, and not as part of the Enhanced Border Security and Visa Entry Reform Act of 2002 which comprises this chapter.
# 

# 

# 2017-2018 Federal Pell Grant Program End-of-Year Report

# U.S. Department of Education

# Office of Postsecondary Education
#### Mary Carletta, Respondent, v. Vincent S. Albini et al., Appellants.

Motion by appellants for a stay, pending appeal, denied. Beldock, P. J., Christ, Hill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-K
FOR PRIMA ENERGY CORPORATION FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                       2,522,000
<SECURITIES>                                 2,391,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,743,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (47,000)
<INVENTORY>                                    612,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            10,673,000
<PP&E>                                      91,688,000
<DEPRECIATION>                            (36,081,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              66,866,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,206,000
<BONDS>                                        120,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        87,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  51,221,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                66,866,000
<SALES>                                     20,568,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            30,092,000
<CGS>                                       14,125,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               16,826,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             11,125,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 3,060,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          8,065,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 8,065,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.40
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.37
        

</TABLE>
#### 1644.270 FEHBP contract clause.

The clause set forth at section 1652.244-70 shall be inserted in all experience rated FEHBP contracts.

[62 FR 47576, Sept. 10, 1997]
### §8301. Uniform retirement date

(a) Except as otherwise specifically provided by this title or other statute, retirement authorized by statute is effective on the first day of the month following the month in which retirement would otherwise be effective.

(b) Notwithstanding subsection (a) of this section, the rate of active or retired pay or allowance is computed as of the date retirement would have occurred but for subsection (a) of this section.

(Pub. L. 89–554, Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 557.)

| Derivation | U.S. Code | Revised Statutes and Statutes at Large |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | 5 U.S.C. 47a. | Apr. 23, 1930, ch. 209, §1, 46 Stat. 253. |

Statutes at Large

In subsection (a), the words "Except as otherwise specifically provided by this title or other statute" are added because of the statutes carried into subchapter III of chapter 83. The words "of Federal personnel of whatever class, civil, military, naval, judicial, legislative, or otherwise, and for whatever cause retired" are omitted as unnecessary. The words "and said first day of the month for retirements made after July 1, 1930, shall be for all purposes in lieu of such date for retirement as was on April 23, 1930, authorized" are omitted as executed.

Standard changes are made to conform with the definitions applicable and the style of this title as outlined in the preface to the report.
##### 



Exhibit 32.3

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Current Report on Form 10-Q of Claires Stores, Inc. (the Company)
for the quarterly period ended October 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ira D. Kaplan, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| |                         |  |  | 
| | ----------------------- |  |  | 
| |                         | 
| | /s/ Ira D. Kaplan       | 
| | Ira D. Kaplan           | 
| | Chief Financial Officer | 
|

December 9, 2004
§ 989.11 Combining EIAP with other documentation. ( a ) The EPF combines environmental analysis with other related documentation when practicable (40 CFR 1506.4) following the procedures prescribed by the CEQ regulations and this part.
( b ) The EPF must integrate comprehensive planning (AFI 32-7062, Air Force Comprehensive Planning[9] ) with the requirements of the EIAP. Prior to making a decision to proceed, the EPF must analyze the environmental impacts that could result from implementation of a proposal identified in the comprehensive plan.
Footnotes -
989.11
[9] See footnote 1 to § 989.1.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
OFFICE OF AIR QUALITY PLANNING AND STANDARDS

109 T.W. ALEXANDER DRIVE RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NORTH CAROLINA 27705

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Emissions Inventory and Air Quality Modeling Data Files used for the Regulatory Impact Analysis of the final 2015 Nati onal Ambient Air Quality Standards for

Ozone

FROM: Richard A. Wayland, Director Air Quality Assessment Division, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards

TO: Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2013-0169

DATE: September 20, 2015

The purpose of this memorandum is to provide contact information for persons who would like to obtain emissions inventory a nd air quality modeling data files which were used for the Regulatory Impact Analysis (RIA) of the final 2015 National Ambient Air Quality Standards for ozone. The emissions inventory modeling anal yses are discussed in the Technical Support Document: Preparation of Emissions Inventor ies for the Version 6.2, 2011 Emissions Modeling Platform. The input emissions m odeling inventories, ancillary da ta, and processing scripts are

available in the 2011v6.2 section of EPA’ s emissions modeling clearinghouse at http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/emch/index.html. The ai r quality modeling analysis is discussed in Chapter 2 and Appendix 2A of the RIA. Both the technical support document and the RIA itself

are contained in this do cket (EPA-HQ-OAR-2013-0169).

To obtain the data files please contact:

Heather Simon EPA/OAQPS/AQMG

109 T.W. Alexander Drive

C439-01 Research Triangle Park, NC 27709 simon.heather@epa.gov OFFICE OF
AIR AND RADIATION
#### Philip Soulier et al., Respondents, v. Lester Harrison et al., Appellants.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court at Special Term, dated January 2, 1964, in Albany County, which granted a motion by plaintiffs for an order granting leave to increase the amount prayed for in the complaint from $5,000 to $20,000 in the Philip Soulier cause of action and from $20,000 to $40,000 in the Marie Rose Soulier cause of action. Three thousand twenty-five of the CPLR concerning amendment of pleadings provides that “Leave shall be freely given upon such terms as may be just including the granting of costs and continuances.” It is now well established that permission to increase the *ad damnum*clause in an action for damages for personal injuries lies within the sound discretion of the court *(Natale*v. *Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.,*8 A D 2d 781; *Teplitsky*v. *Kamensky,*9 A D 2d 671; *Cox*v. *New York Tel. Co.,*10 A D 2d 565). We see no reason to disturb the ruling of the Special Term. Here we have a negligence action, the trial of which has been delayed largely as a result of one of the defendants being in the military service and out of the country. The defendants have had full knowledge of the injuries and damages claimed by the plaintiffs. In our opinion they cannot seriously urge that they have been prejudiced. As said by the court in *Natale*v. *Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. (supra)*“We give no more weight to the increased amount than we would have given had it been asserted originally. That is, an *ad damnum*clause merely informs an adversary of the maximum amount of the claim asserted without in any wise being proof of injury or indeed of liability.” We conclude that upon the record in this case the Special Term did not abuse its discretion in granting the motion. Order affirmed, with costs. Herlihy, J. P., Reynolds, Taylor, Aulisi and Hamm, JJ., concur.
### §3807. General enforcement provisions

#### (a) Injunctions

The Attorney General, upon the request of the Secretary, shall bring an action to enjoin the violation of, or to compel compliance with, any provision of this chapter or any regulation issued by the Secretary hereunder by any person. Such action shall be brought in the appropriate United States district court for the judicial district in which such person resides or transacts business or in which the violation or omission has occurred or is about to occur. Process in such cases may be served in any judicial district wherein the defendant resides or transacts business or wherever the defendant may be found.

#### (b) Access to premises or facility and books and records; examination; samples

Any person subject to the provisions of this chapter shall, at all reasonable times, upon notice by a duly authorized representative of the Secretary, afford such representative access to his premises or facility and opportunity to examine the premises or facility, the garbage there at, and books and records thereof, to copy all such books and records and to take reasonable samples of such garbage.

#### (c) Additional powers

For the efficient execution of the provisions of this chapter, and in order to provide information for the use of Congress, the provisions (including penalties) of sections 46 and 48 through 50 of title 15, are made applicable to the jurisdiction, powers, and duties of the Secretary in enforcing the provisions of this chapter and to any person subject to the provisions of this chapter, whether or not a corporation. The Secretary, in person or by such agents as he may designate, may prosecute any inquiry necessary to his duties under this chapter in any part of the United States.

(Pub. L. 96–468, §8, Oct. 17, 1980, 94 Stat. 2232.)
### §921. Congressional declaration of policy

It is declared to be the policy of the Congress that adequate telephone service be made generally available in rural areas through the improvement and expansion of existing telephone facilities and the construction and operation of such additional facilities as are required to assure the availability of adequate telephone service to the widest practicable number of rural users of such service.

(Oct. 28, 1949, ch. 776, §1, 63 Stat. 948.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section is composed of the first sentence of section 1 of act Oct. 28, 1949. The second sentence of section 1 of that act, which provided that: "In order to effectuate this policy, the Rural Electrification Act of 1936 [this chapter] is amended as hereinafter provided", is omitted from the Code.

Section was not enacted as part of title II of the Rural Electrification Act of 1936 which comprises subchapter II of this chapter.
#### In the Matter of the Town of North Hempstead, Appellant, Relative to Acquiring Title to Real Property for Drainage Purposes and/or Other Public Purposes Located in the Vicinity of Broadway and Other Streets, in the Town of *730North Hempstead, Nassau County. Hampshire Syndicate, Ltd., Respondent.

Motion to dismiss appeal denied on condition that appellant be ready to argue or submit the appeal at the September 1960 Term, beginning September 7,1960, for which term the appeal is ordered to be placed on the calendar. The record and appellant’s brief must be served and filed on or before August 1, 1960. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Ughetta, Christ and Pette, JJ., concur.
#### INSKY v. CHATKOFF.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.

June 22, 1903.)

1. Municipal Court—Judgment—Authority to Vacate.

Municipal Court Act (Laws 1902, p. 1563, c. 580, § 251), authorizing the court to. vacate a judgment and grant a new trial in specified cases, does not empower the court to vacate a judgment in favor of one party and give a judgment in favor of the other party.

Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Fifth District.

Action by Sol Inslcy against Benjamin Chatkoff. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. Reversed.

Argued before FREEDMAN, P. J., and GILDERSLEEVE and MacLEAN, JJ.

A. I. Albert, for appellant.

S. Chugerman, for respondent.

GILDERSLEEVE, J.

The record in the case reads as follows, viz.:

> “The case here closed, and said justice thereupon, to wit, on the 5th day of March, 1903, rendered judgment in favor of the defendant and against the plaintiff, and subsequently, upon motion to resettle, the same was vacated, and judgment granted in favor of plaintiff and against the defendant for $23.25, and $2 costs.”

The court, under the conditions set forth in section 254 of the municipal court act (Laws 1902, p. 1563, c. 580), has the power to vacate a judgment and grant a new trial, but there is no authority given to the court to vacate a judgment in favor of one party and give a judgment in favor of the other party.

The judgment must be reversed and a new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide the event. All concur.
1232.770-4 Policy. ( a ) A fixed-price, time-and-materials, or labor-hour contract or order for commercial or non-commercial severable services may be incrementally funded when— ( 1 ) Funds are provided to DOT or operating administration under a CR. This includes funds appropriated to DOT or an operating administration, funds appropriated to another entity that will be directly obligated on a DOT contract, and funds in a revolving fund or similar account that will be reimbursed by a customer agency funded by a CR;
( 2 ) The responsible fiscal authority has not allocated sufficient funds to fully fund the contract action that is otherwise authorized to be issued;
( 3 ) There is no statutory restriction that would preclude the proposed use of funds;
( 4 ) Funds are available and unexpired, as of the date the funds are obligated;
( 5 ) Assurance is provided by the responsible financial authority that full funding is anticipated once an appropriations act is enacted; and
( 6 ) The clause prescribed by 1232.770-7 is incorporated into the contract or order.
( b ) Incremental funding may be limited to an individual line item(s) or a particular order(s).
#### 1415.406 Documentation.
#### 15.000 Scope of part.

This part prescribes policies and procedures governing competitive and noncompetitive negotiated acquisitions. A contract awarded using other than sealed bidding procedures is a negotiated contract (see 14.101).
Case: 1:12-cv-00433 Document #: 21 Filed: 10/11/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:124
### §15. Inapplicability of the Act of State doctrine

Enforcement of arbitral agreements, confirmation of arbitral awards, and execution upon judgments based on orders confirming such awards shall not be refused on the basis of the Act of State doctrine.

(Added Pub. L. 100–669, §1, Nov. 16, 1988, 102 Stat. 3969.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Another section 15 of this title was renumbered section 16 of this title.
### National and regional trends in water-well drilling in the United States, 1964-84

By: S. M. HindallMichael Eberle

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/cir1029

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
Appeal No. 74-275.

#### Gloria Corona *et al. v.*Robert F. Burns *et al.*

*Anthony R. Berretto,*for plaintiffsappellees. *Richard J. Israel,*Attorney General, *George H. Egan,*Special Asst. Attorney General, *Maurice W. Hendel,*for defendants-appellants.

Motion to consolidate instant case with case of *Chase*v. *Burns,*114 R. I. 910, 329 A.2d 404 (1974), is granted. Motion for special assignment is granted, and the matter is assigned to the calendar for Monday, February 3, 1975, for hearing on the merits.
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Canna Montclair, Respondent, v. Melbourne E. Griffith, Doing Business as O’Dell Company, et al., Appellants. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.

Appeal by the employer and carrier from a decision and award of the Workmen’s Compensation Board on the ground that there is no substantial evidence that claimant has a permanent partial disability causally related to employment. It is undisputed that on June 13, 1958 while lifting a large box of fish in the course of her employment, claimant sustained a severe lower back strain. *919Accident, notice and causal relationship were found for this injury and payments for reduced earnings made for the period from June 16, 1958 to January 19, 1962. During this period claimant underwent various treatments from heat therapy to a body east without substantial recovery and her condition was finally diagnosed, at least in part, as a hysterical neurotic reaction. In January, 1962, the carrier ceased payments on the basis of a report by a Dr. Ayer that claimant was simply malingering. At the ensuing hearing the appellants contended simply that there was no permanent disability and that there were plenty of jobs which claimant could perform if she chose to look for one. A report of a board medical examiner made just prior to the hearing, however, indicated a mild permanent partial disability. Appellants never disputed or even attempted to argue causal relationship at the hearing nor was the issue raised before the board. Further appellants never requested to cross-examine the board medical examiner nor did they produce Dr. Ayer or any other physician to testify that claimant’s present condition was not related to the accident. On this state of the record, there is no basis for disturbing the board’s determination. Decision and award affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Bergan, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds and Taylor, JJ., concur.
### §§5211, 5212. Repealed. Pub. L. 101–624, title XV, §1571, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 3702

Section 5211, Pub. L. 100–418, title IV, §4201, Aug. 23, 1988, 102 Stat. 1390, related to annual reports by Secretary of Agriculture on long-term agricultural trade strategy. See section 5711 of this title.

Section 5212, Pub. L. 100–418, title IV, §4202, Aug. 23, 1988, 102 Stat. 1391, directed Secretary of Agriculture to provide technical services to United States Trade Representative on matters concerning agricultural trade. See section 5675 of this title.
### §1437. Resident Philippine citizens excepted from certain requirements

Any person who (1) was a citizen of the Commonwealth of the Philippines on July 2, 1946, (2) entered the United States prior to May 1, 1934, and (3) has, since such entry, resided continuously in the United States shall be regarded as having been lawfully admitted to the United States for permanent residence for the purpose of applying for naturalization under this subchapter.

(June 27, 1952, ch. 477, title III, ch. 2, §326, 66 Stat. 248; Pub. L. 101–649, title IV, §407(c)(9), Nov. 29, 1990, 104 Stat. 5041.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1990—Pub. L. 101–649 substituted "applying" for "petitioning".
#### 1552.216-79 Award term availability of funds.

As prescribed in 1516.406(c), insert the following clause:

# Award Term Availability of Funds (FEB 2008)

Funds are not presently available for any award term. The Government's obligation under any award term is contingent upon the availability of appropriated funds from which payment can be made. No legal liability on the part of the Government for any award term payment may arise until funds are made available to the Contracting Officer for an award term and until the Contractor receives notice of such availability, to be confirmed in writing by the Contracting Officer.

(End of clause)

[73 FR 1981, Jan. 11, 2008, as amended at 81 FR 31528, May 19, 2016]