T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T D ESH A M . CA RTER, P la in tif

f - A p p e lla n t, v. M . Y A R B O R O U G H ; e t a l., D efen d an t s - A p p el l ees. N o. 10- 55015 D . C . N o . 2 : 0 5 -cv -0 6 5 0 2 -P A -P JW ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e C e n tr a l D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia P e r c yA nde r s on, D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d D e c e m be r19, 2011 ** B efo re: G O O D W IN , W A L L A C E , an dM cK E O W N , C i rcu i tJu d g es. D es ha M . C art er , a C al i forni a s t at e pri soner, appeal s pro se fr om the di stri ct c ourt ’ s s um m a ryj udgm e nti n hi s 42 U . S . C . § 1983 a c t i on a l l e gi ng va r i ous c o n s titu tio n a l v io la tio n s . W e h a v e ju r is d ic tio n u n d e r2 8 U .S .C . § 1 2 9 1 . W e r e v ie w d e n o v o s u m m a ryju d g m e n t o n th e b a s is o f q u a lif ie dim m u n ity , G al en v. 

# FI LED JAN 04 2 012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS10- 55015 2 C ou nt y of L os A ng eles , 4 7 7 F. 3 d6 5 2 , 6 5 8 ( 9 th Ci r . 2 0 0 7 ) , a n dw e a f f i rm. T he di s tr i c tc ourtpr ope r l ygr a nt e d s um m a ryj udgm e nton the ba s i s of qu al i fi ed i m m un i ty on C art er ’ s deni al of ou t do or exerc i se cl ai m because C art er f a i l e d t o r a i s e age nui ne di s put e of m a t e r i a l f

a c ta s t o w he the ri tw oul d be c l e a rt o a r e a s onabl e of

f i c e rtha tr e s tr i c t i ng C a rt e r ’ s out doore xe r c i s e dur i ng the pr i s on s e c u r itylo c k d o w n v io la te dh is c o n s titu tio n a l r ig h ts . See N orw oo d v. V

an ce , 591 F .3 d1 0 6 2 , 1 0 6 8 - 7 0 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 1 0 ) ( p r is o n o f f ic ia ls e n title dto q u a lif

ie dim m u n ity on de ni a l of

out doore xe r c i s e c l a i m be c aus e ar e a s onabl e of f i c e rc oul d ha ve bel i eved thatre stri ct i ng ou t do or exerc i se du ri ng pri son sec uri ty l ockd ow n w as c o n s titu tio n a l) , ce rt. deni ed , 13 1 S . C t . 14 65 (201 1). T he di s tr i c tc ourtpr ope r l ygr a nt e d s um m a ryj udgm e nton C a rt e r ’ s a c c e s s - t oc o u rt c la im b e c au s e C a rte rf a ile dto r a is e ag e n u in e d is p u te o f m a te r ia l f

a c t a s to w h e th e rth e w a r d e n k n e w th a t th e p r is o n s ta f f w a s n o t f

o llo w in g th e d ir e c tiv e to p r o v id e le g a l m a te r ia ls to th e p r is o n e r s w ith c o u rt d e a d lin e s . See T a ylo r v. L ist , 880 F . 2d 1040, 1045 ( 9th C i r . 1989) ( no r e s ponde a ts upe r i orl i abi l i tyunde r§ 1983; pl ai nt i ff m ustshow defe nd ant ’ s per sonal i nv ol vem enti n al l eged vi ol at i on s) . C art er ’ s r em ai ni ng cont ent i on s are un pers uasi ve. AF F I RME D.