alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 809a.4 Use of Government facilities.

Commanders are prohibited from authorizing demonstrations for partisan political purposes. Demonstrations on any Air Force installation for other than political purposes may only occur with the prior approval of the installation commander. Demonstrations that could result in interference with, or prevention of, the orderly accomplishment of the mission of an installation or that present a clear danger to loyalty, discipline or morale of members of the Armed Forces will not be approved.
§ 935.150 Registration. ( a ) Each person who has custody of any of the following on Wake Island shall register it with the Commander. ( 1 ) A privately owned motor vehicle.
( 2 ) A privately owned boat.
( 3 ) An indigenous animal, military working dog, or guide dog for the blind or visually-impaired accompanying its owner.
( 4 ) A narcotic or dangerous drug or any poison.
( b ) Each person who obtains custody of an article described in paragraph (a) (4) of this section shall register it immediately upon obtaining custody. Each person who obtains custody of any other article described in paragraph (a) of this section shall register it within 10 days after obtaining custody.
#### The People of the State of New York v. Charles E. Trudeau, Also Known as Charles Truedell, Also Known as Charles Devereau, Also Known as Paul Denning.

Motion for a change of venue denied. Memorandum: *887The District Attorney has failed to submit any proof to sustain his claim that a fair and impartial trial cannot be had in the Onondaga County Court. The cross-examination by the prosecutor of the defense witnesses, Nolan and Fox, was improper and highly prejudicial to the defendant. If a mistrial had not been granted a jury verdict finding defendant guilty of any crime would have been placed in serious jeopardy by this improper cross-examination. The other charges in the moving papers leveled against the trial court and the Presiding Judge thereof are without merit. It is alleged, among other things, that “ The favor of the Court to the defendant’s case is shown * * * in its continued refusal to allow the People to make offers of proof.” To substantiate this serious charge it is claimed that the court refused to receive in evidence telephone conversations claimed to have been made between the victim of the homicide before her death and third persons not in the presence of the defendant. Such evidence was so clearly inadmissible that the persistence of the prosecutor in now using it to sustain a charge that the trial court was biased is difficult to understand. We have examined all of the allegations of the District Attorney and in fairness to the Presiding Judge state that the charges of bias and unfairness are without basis in fact. Indeed, the Trial Judge acted with remarkable restraint under highly provocative circumstances.
Exhibit 10.31
 Amendment No. 1  to the  Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated  Supplemental Savings Incentive Plan  (As Amended and Restated Effective January 1, 2007)
       1.32 Plan Administrator
 The Vice Chairman of the Board or such other person designated by such
individual or by the Chief Executive Officer of the Company.
  (c)
    
    Post-2009 Matching Contributions:The Plan Administrator, in his
or her sole and absolute discretion, may change the amount of the Matching
Contribution described in Subsection (b) of this Section for any Plan Year
beginning after the 2009 Plan Year, from time to time with respect to payroll
periods subsequent to the adoption of such change; provided, however, that any
such change may not cause an increase to the Matching Contribution described in
Subsection (b) of this Section.




---



##### 



Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of
Coca-Cola Bottling Co.ConsolidatedBy:
    
    /s/ Henry W. FlintHenry W. FlintDate: December 4, 2009 - 2 -
#### In the Matter of David D. Taylor, Petitioner, v. Thomas H. Ramsden, as Warden of Nassau County Jail, et al., Respondents.

Application by petitioner, pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Act, against respondents who are, respectively, the Warden, the District Attorney and a Justice of the Supreme Court of Nassau County, to compel them to pay him a sum of money as damages by reason of their alleged failure to comply with a writ of habeas corpus. Cross motions by respondents, pursuant to section 1293 of article 78 of the Civil Practice Act, to dismiss the petition on the ground that it fails to set forth facts sufficient to entitle petitioner to the relief sought. Cross motions granted; petition dismissed, without prejudice to such other action or proceeding as petitioner may be advised. Beldock, P. J., Brennan, Hill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Oxygen Biotherapeutics, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended October 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Chris J. Stern, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and 

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company. 

Date: December 9, 2010 

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
§ 47.1 Purpose. This document: ( a ) Revises 32 CFR part 47 and implements Public Law 95-202.
( b ) Directs the Secretary of the Air Force to determine if an established group of civilian employees or contract workers provided service to the U.S. Armed Forces in a manner considered active military service for Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) benefits.
( c ) Establishes the DoD Civilian/Military Service Review Board and the Advisory Panel.
( d ) Establishes policy, assigns responsibilities, prescribes application procedures for groups and individuals, and clarifies the factors used to determine active duty (AD) service.
### §940e. Expansion of 911 access

#### (a) In general

Subject to subsection (c) and such terms and conditions as the Secretary may prescribe, the Secretary may make loans under this subchapter to entities eligible to borrow from the Rural Utilities Service, State or local governments, Indian tribes (as defined in section 5304 of title 25), or other public entities for facilities and equipment to expand or improve in rural areas—

(1) 911 access;

(2) integrated interoperable emergency communications, including multiuse networks that provide critical transportation-related information services in addition to emergency communications services;

(3) homeland security communications;

(4) transportation safety communications; or

(5) location technologies used outside an urbanized area.

#### (b) Loan security

Government-imposed fees related to emergency communications (including State or local 911 fees) may be considered to be security for a loan under this section.

#### (c) Emergency communications equipment providers

The Secretary may make a loan under this section to an emergency communication equipment provider to expand or improve 911 access or other communications or technologies described in subsection (a) if the local government that has jurisdiction over the project is not allowed to acquire the debt resulting from the loan.

#### (d) Authorization of appropriations

The Secretary shall use to make loans under this section any funds otherwise made available for telephone loans for each of fiscal years 2008 through 2023.

(May 20, 1936, ch. 432, title III, §315, as added Pub. L. 107–171, title VI, §6102, May 13, 2002, 116 Stat. 415; amended Pub. L. 110–234, title VI, §6107, May 22, 2008, 122 Stat. 1198; Pub. L. 110–246, §4(a), title VI, §6107, June 18, 2008, 122 Stat. 1664, 1959; Pub. L. 113–79, title VI, §6103, Feb. 7, 2014, 128 Stat. 851; Pub. L. 115–334, title VI, §6506, Dec. 20, 2018, 132 Stat. 4775.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Pub. L. 110–234 and Pub. L. 110–246 made identical amendments to this section. The amendments by Pub. L. 110–234 were repealed by section 4(a) of Pub. L. 110–246.

#### Amendments

2018—Subsec. (a)(2). Pub. L. 115–334, §6506(1), substituted "critical transportation-related" for "commercial or transportation".

Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 115–334, §6506(2), substituted "2023" for "2018".

2014—Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 113–79 substituted "2018" for "2012".

2008—Pub. L. 110–246, §6107, amended section generally, substituting provisions relating to expansion of access, loan security, emergency communications equipment providers, and authorization of appropriations, consisting of subsecs. (a) to (d), for provisions relating to expansion of access and authorization of appropriations, consisting of subsecs. (a) and (b).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2008 Amendment

Amendment of this section and repeal of Pub. L. 110–234 by Pub. L. 110–246 effective May 22, 2008, the date of enactment of Pub. L. 110–234, see section 4 of Pub. L. 110–246, set out as an Effective Date note under section 8701 of this title.
**CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**
 **AND
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**
 **PURSUANT
TO**
 **18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 The
undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to, and as required by, 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
the Quarterly Report of DCAP Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the
period ended June 30, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that
information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.
 
 
 
 Date:
      August 15, 2005
    /s/ Barry Goldstein
      Barry
      Goldstein,
      Chief
      Executive Officer and
      Chief
      Financial Officer
1304.1301 Policy. ( a ) Implementation of Federal Information Processing Standards Publication (FIPS PUB) 201 and OMB guidance M-05-24 is set forth in DOC Personal Identify Verification (PIV) Implementation Guidance, which is available on the Office of Security Web site.
( b ) The DOC official responsible for verifying contractor employee personal identity is set forth in the DOC Personal Identify Verification (PIV) Implementation Guidance.
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-23-00113-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF E.J., B.J., K.C.

AND K.C., CHILDREN

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from the 360th District 

Court

of Tarrant County (360-714221-22)

October 5, 2023

Memorandum Opinion by Justice 

Walker

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there 

was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial 

court is affirmed. 

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Brian Walker

 Justice Brian Walker
#### 12.216 Unenforceability of unauthorized obligations.

Many supplies or services are acquired subject to supplier license agreements. These are particularly common in information technology acquisitions, but they may apply to any supply or service. For example, computer software and services delivered through the internet (web services) are often subject to license agreements, referred to as End User License Agreements (EULA), Terms of Service (TOS), or other similar legal instruments or agreements. Many of these agreements contain indemnification clauses that are inconsistent with Federal law and unenforceable, but which could create a violation of the Anti-Deficiency Act (31 U.S.C. 1341) if agreed to by the Government. Paragraph (u) of the clause at 52.212-4 prevents any such violations.

[78 FR 37688, June 21, 2013]
#### 1352.271-76 Performance.

As prescribed in 48 CFR 1371.107, insert the following clause:

# Performance (APR 2010)

(a) The contractor shall not commence work until a notice to proceed has been issued by the Contracting Officer.

(b) The Government shall deliver the vessel described in the contract at such time and location as may be specified in the contract. Upon completion of the work, the Government shall accept delivery of the vessel at such time and location as may be specified in the contract.

(c) Without additional charge to the Government, and without specific requirement in the contract, the contractor shall:

(1) Make available, at the facility, to personnel of the vessel while in drydock or on a marine railway, sanitary facilities adequate for the number of personnel using them and acceptable to the Contracting Officer;

(2) Supply and maintain, in such condition as the Contracting Officer may reasonably require, suitable brows and gangways from the pier, drydock or marine railway to the vessel;

(3) Perform, or pay the cost of, any repair, reconditioning or replacement made necessary as the result of the use by the contractor of any of the vessel's machinery, equipment or fittings, including, but not limited to, winches, pumps, riggings, or pipe lines; and

(4) Furnish suitable offices, office equipment and telephones at or near the site of the work as the Contracting Officer reasonably requires for personnel designated by the Government.

(d) Except as otherwise provided in the contract, the contractor shall furnish all necessary material, labor, supervision, services, equipment, tools, supplies, power, accessories, facilities, and other things and services necessary for accomplishing the work.

(e) The contractor shall conduct dock and sea trials of the vessel as required by the contract. Unless otherwise expressly provided in the contract, during the conduct of these trials the vessel shall be under the control of the vessel's commander and crew with representatives of the contractor and the Government on board to determine whether the work provided by the contractor has been satisfactorily performed. Dock and sea trials not specified which the contractor requires for its own benefit shall not be undertaken by the contractor without prior notice to and approval of the Contracting Officer; any such dock or sea trial shall be conducted at the risk and expense of the contractor. The contractor shall provide and install all fittings and appliances which may be necessary for the dock and sea trials to enable the representatives of the Government to determine whether the requirements of the contract plans and specifications have been met. The contractor shall also be responsible for the care, installation and removal of any instruments and apparatus furnished by the Government for such trials.

(End of clause)

[75 FR 10570, Mar. 8, 2010; 75 FR 14496, Mar. 26, 2010]
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     See accompanying notes
     $ in thousands, except per share amounts.
</LEGEND>                                              
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-30-1995
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-30-1995
<CASH>                                         35406
<SECURITIES>                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  12514
<ALLOWANCES>                                       0
<INVENTORY>                                    12616
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               68063
<PP&E>                                         59600
<DEPRECIATION>                                     0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                131074
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          17040
<BONDS>                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        1
<COMMON>                                         239
<OTHER-SE>                                         0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  131074
<SALES>                                       155333
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   0
<CGS>                                         109125
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 597
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              1525
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 9405
<INCOME-TAX>                                    3457
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                0
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                    5948
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    .83
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    .82
        


</TABLE>
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Juan Carlos Garcia, Appellant

No. 06-18-00008-CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

Appeal from the 276th District Court of 

Camp County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. CF-16-

01679). Opinion delivered by Chief Justice 

Morriss, Justice Moseley and Justice 

Burgess participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We further order that the appellant, Juan Carlos Garcia, pay all costs of this appeal.

RENDERED JUNE 22, 2018

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
September 27/ 2016 Charles Bennett

TDCJ-CID# 2015277

Stringfellow Unit

1200 P.M. 655

Rosharon, Texas 77583

Twelfth Court of Appeals

1517 West Front Street, Suite 354

Tyler, Texas 757202

RE: Case Number 12-15-00202-CR

Trial Court Case Number 05CR-051

In The 349th Judicial District Court

Houston County, Texas

Dear Clerk,

FILED IN COURT OF APPEALS

12th Court of Appeals District

SEP 2 9 2016

TYLBiTEXAS

PAM ESTES, CLERK

I am corresponding in regards to the above-mentioned Case

Number in hopes that you have a copy of the Court Reporter's

Record available. If so, could you please let me know how much

you will charge me for a copy of that record.

Your time and consideration in this matter is greatly

appreciated/ Thank you.

Sincerely,

Char-"lac Charles HannaH- Bennett ' **

CC/Filed: cb
§ 770.39 Entry procedures. ( a ) Any person or group of persons desiring to obtain advance consent for entry upon any U.S. Naval installation or property in Puerto Rico from the Commanding Officer of the Naval installation or property, or an authorized representative of that Commanding Officer, shall present themselves at an authorized entry gate at the installation or property concerned or, in the alternative, submit a request in writing to the following respective addresses: ( 1 ) Commanding Officer, U.S. Naval Station, Roosevelt Roads, Box 3001, Ceiba, PR 00635.
( 2 ) Officer in Charge, Naval Ammunition Facility, Box 3027, Ceiba, PR 00635.
( 3 ) Commanding Officer, U.S. Naval Security Group Activity, Sabana Seca, PR 00749.
( b ) The above Commanding Officers are authorized to provide advance consent only for installations and properties under their command. Requests for entry authorization to any other facility or property shall be addressed to the following: Commander, U.S. Naval Forces, Caribbean, Box 3037, Ceiba, PR 00635.
( c ) Each request for entry will be considered on an individual basis and consent will be determined by applicable installation entry instructions. Factors that will be considered include the purpose of visit, the size of party, duration of visit, destination, security safeguards, safety aspects, and the military resources necessary if the request is granted.
### §2009e. Transfers of funds

#### (a) General authority

Subject to subsection (b) of this section, the State Director 1 of any State may, during any fiscal year, transfer from each account specified in section 2009d(c) of this title a total of not more than 25 percent of the amount in the account that is allocated for the State for the fiscal year to any other account in which amounts are allocated for the State for the fiscal year.

#### (b) Limitation

Except as provided in subsection (c) of this section, a transfer otherwise authorized by subsection (a) of this section to be made during a fiscal year may not be made to the extent that the sum of the amount to be transferred and all amounts so transferred by State directors under subsection (a) of this section during the fiscal year exceeds 10 percent of the total amount made available to carry out the authorities described in section 2009d(d) of this title for the fiscal year.

#### (c) Exceptions

Subsections (a) and (b) shall not apply to a transfer of funds by a State director if the State director certifies to the Secretary that—

(1) there is an approved application for a project in the function category to which the funds are to be transferred but funds are not available for the project in the function category; and

(2)(A) there is no such approved application in the function category from which the funds are to be transferred; or

(B) the community that would benefit from the project has a smaller population and a lesser per capita income than any community that would benefit from a project in the function category from which the funds are to be transferred.

(Pub. L. 87–128, title III, §381F, as added Pub. L. 104–127, title VII, §761, Apr. 4, 1996, 110 Stat. 1142.)

1 So in original. Probably should not be capitalized.
1401.403 Individual deviations. ( a ) The Director, PAM, is authorized to approve deviations of FAR provisions (see FAR 1.4) or DIAR provisions which affect only one contracting action.
( b ) Requests for deviations under paragraph (a) of this section shall be submitted by the BPC and include justification for the deviation.
( c ) A copy of the approved deviation shall be included in the contract file.
Date: July 29, 2013
To: Terri Plumb

Regulations Development Group OSORA
From: Jy

me Schafer Director Division of Medical and Surgical Services Coverage and Anal ys is Group Office of Clinical Standards and Quality Subject: Rulemaking Record for CMS

- 1600

- P: Medi care Program; Revisions to

Pay ment Policies under the Phy sician Fee Schedule, Clinical L aboratory Fee Schedule & other Revisions to Part B for CY 2014

I certify that t o the best of my

knowledge , the attached informati on includes all material that **Division of Medical and Surgical Services, Coverage and Analysis Group, OCSQ**  considered , or had before it in developing the above

- referenced rul e. I have identified an y proprietary data or confidential information that shou ld not be released to the public upon a request for information under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). Attached is an index of all material included

.**Index of Supporting Information for:** 

CMS

- 1600

- P : Medi care Program; Revisions to Pay ment Policies under the Phy sician Fee Schedule, Clinical Laboratory Fee Schedule & other Revisions to Part B for CY 2014
Title of Document Does this document contain confidential information or proprietary data? 1. United States Preventive Services Task Force; Screening for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: Recommendation Statement. http://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf05/aaascr/aaars.pdf No.

2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13.