alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 8 (Wednesday, January 13, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2687-2688]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-00489]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Aging; Notice of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial

[[Page 2688]]

property such as patentable material, and personal information 
concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the 
disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of 
personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis 
Panel; Transition to Aging.
    Date: February 17-18, 2021.
    Time: 2:00 p.m. to 4:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, 7201 
Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Video Meeting).
    Contact Person: Dario Dieguez, Jr., Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Branch, National Institute on Aging, 
National Institutes of Health, Gateway Building, Suite 2W200, 7201 
Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 827-3101, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#dcb8bdaeb5b3f2b8b5b9bba9b9a69cb2b5b4f2bbb3aa"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b9ddd8cbd0d697ddd0dcdeccdcc3f9d7d0d197ded6cf">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis 
Panel; Molecular Determinants of AD Risk.
    Date: March 16, 2021.
    Time: 12:30 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, 7201 
Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Video Meeting).
    Contact Person: Joshua Jin-Hyouk Park, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Branch, National Institute on Aging, 
National Institutes of Health, Gateway Building, 2W200, 7201 
Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 496-6208, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#bed4d1cdd6cbdf90cedfccd58afed0d7d690d9d1c8"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c3a9acb0abb6a2edb3a2b1a8f783adaaabeda4acb5">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging 
Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 7, 2021.
Miguelina Perez,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2021-00489 Filed 1-12-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 9 (Thursday, January 14, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 3195]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-00676]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

JUDICIAL CONFERENCE OF THE UNITED STATES


Advisory Committee on Criminal Rules; Meeting of the Judicial 
Conference

AGENCY: Judicial Conference of the United States.

ACTION: Advisory Committee on Criminal Rules, Notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Advisory Committee on Criminal Rules will hold a meeting 
on May 11, 2021 in Washington, DC. The meeting will be open to public 
observation but not participation. An agenda and supporting materials 
will be posted at least 7 days in advance of the meeting at: http://www.uscourts.gov/rules-policies/records-and-archives-rules-committees/agenda-books.

DATES: May 11, 2021, 9 a.m.-5 p.m. (Eastern).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rebecca A. Womeldorf, Secretary, 
Committee on Rules of Practice and Procedure of the Judicial Conference 
of the United States, Thurgood Marshall Federal Judiciary Building, One 
Columbus Circle NE, Suite 7-300, Washington, DC 20544, Phone (202) 502-
1820, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5301263f3620103c3e3e3a272736360c00363021362732212a13323c7d2620303c262127207d343c25"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f2a0879e9781b19d9f9f9b86869797ada1979180978693808bb2939ddc8781919d87808681dc959d84">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Authority:  28 U.S.C. 2073.

    Dated: January 11, 2021.
Rebecca A. Womeldorf,
Rules Committee Secretary, Rules Committee Staff.
[FR Doc. 2021-00676 Filed 1-13-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 2210-55-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### 1352.301 Solicitation provisions and contract clauses (Matrix).

[![](https://img.federalregister.gov/ER08MR10.000/ER08MR10.000_large.png)](https://img.federalregister.gov/ER08MR10.000/ER08MR10.000_original_size.png)
[![](https://img.federalregister.gov/ER08MR10.001/ER08MR10.001_large.png)](https://img.federalregister.gov/ER08MR10.001/ER08MR10.001_original_size.png)
[![](https://img.federalregister.gov/ER08MR10.002/ER08MR10.002_large.png)](https://img.federalregister.gov/ER08MR10.002/ER08MR10.002_original_size.png)
[![](https://img.federalregister.gov/ER08MR10.003/ER08MR10.003_large.png)](https://img.federalregister.gov/ER08MR10.003/ER08MR10.003_original_size.png)
[![](https://img.federalregister.gov/ER08MR10.004/ER08MR10.004_large.png)](https://img.federalregister.gov/ER08MR10.004/ER08MR10.004_original_size.png)
[![](https://img.federalregister.gov/ER08MR10.005/ER08MR10.005_large.png)](https://img.federalregister.gov/ER08MR10.005/ER08MR10.005_original_size.png)
[![](https://img.federalregister.gov/ER08MR10.006/ER08MR10.006_large.png)](https://img.federalregister.gov/ER08MR10.006/ER08MR10.006_original_size.png)
[![](https://img.federalregister.gov/ER08MR10.007/ER08MR10.007_large.png)](https://img.federalregister.gov/ER08MR10.007/ER08MR10.007_original_size.png)
[![](https://img.federalregister.gov/ER08MR10.008/ER08MR10.008_large.png)](https://img.federalregister.gov/ER08MR10.008/ER08MR10.008_original_size.png)
[![](https://img.federalregister.gov/ER08MR10.009/ER08MR10.009_large.png)](https://img.federalregister.gov/ER08MR10.009/ER08MR10.009_original_size.png)
### §950aaa–3. Administration

#### (a) Nonduplication

The Secretary shall ensure that facilities constructed using financial assistance provided under this chapter do not duplicate adequate established telemedicine services or distance learning services.

#### (b) Loan maturity

The maturities of cost of money loans shall be determined by the Secretary, based on the useful life of the facility being financed, except that the loan shall not be for a period of more than 10 years.

#### (c) Loan security and feasibility

The Secretary shall make a cost of money loan only if the Secretary determines that the security for the loan is reasonably adequate and that the loan will be repaid within the period of the loan.

#### (d) Encouraging consortia

The Secretary shall encourage the development of consortia to provide telemedicine services or distance learning services through telecommunications in rural areas served by a telecommunications provider.

#### (e) Coordination with other agencies

The Secretary shall coordinate, to the extent practicable, with other Federal and State agencies with similar grant or loan programs to pool resources for funding meritorious proposals in rural areas.

#### (f) Informational efforts

The Secretary shall establish and implement procedures to carry out informational efforts to advise potential end users located in rural areas of each State about the program authorized by this chapter.

(Pub. L. 101–624, title XXIII, §2334, as added Pub. L. 104–127, title VII, §704, Apr. 4, 1996, 110 Stat. 1111.)

#### Termination of Section

For termination of section by section 1(b) of Pub. L. 102–551, see Termination of Chapter note set out under section 950aaa of this title.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 950aaa–3, Pub. L. 101–624, title XXIII, §2334, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 4019; Pub. L. 103–354, title II, §235(b)(4)(B), (C), Oct. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 3221, 3222, contained provisions relevant to telecommunications programs, prior to the general amendment of this chapter by Pub. L. 104–127.
Exhibit 32.1
 SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION*
     /s/ Steven A. Davis

Steven A. DavisChairman and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
 
 *
    
This certification is being furnished as required by Rule 13a-14(b) under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the
United States Code, and shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the
Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liability of that Section. This certification
shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities
Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act, except as otherwise stated in such filing.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

DOLORES NUCCIO, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) No. 12 C 581

)

WATSON DWYER, INC., )

)

Defendant. )

MEMORANDUM ORDER

Watson Dwyer, Inc. (“Watson Dwyer”) has filed its Answer and

Affirmative Defense to the employment discrimination claims

brought against it by Dolores Nuccio (“Nuccio”). This memorandum

order is issued sua sponte because of the challenge to federal

jurisdiction that is reflected in the Answer.

There are a number of problems with Watson Dwyer’s

submission as a pleading matter, but those will not be addressed

here because of the overriding threshold need to determine

whether federal subject matter jurisdiction exists. Answer ¶1

asserts that “Watson Dwyer did not employee [sic] the minimum

number of employees required by these Federal Statutes.” If that

is indeed the case, this action would have to be dismissed for

lack of such jurisdiction (no other predicate for federal

jurisdiction is suggested by Nuccio’s Complaint).

Accordingly this action is set for a status hearing at

9 a.m. May 10, 2012. At or before that date Watson Dwyer’s

counsel is ordered to file, and to deliver to Nuccio’s counsel, a
verified statement as to the employment information that supports

the assertion in Answer ¶1. That subject can then be discussed

at the scheduled status hearing.

________________________________________

Milton I. Shadur

Senior United States District Judge

Date: May 3, 2012

2
<PAGE>

                                                               Exhibit 13.(a)(2)

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                                  AS ENACTED BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report on Form 20-F of Ricoh Company, Ltd. (the
"Company") for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Tatsuo Hirakawa,
Deputy President and Executive Vice President (Corporate Strategy and Personnel)
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (s) 1350, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date: June 28, 2004

                                  By: /s/ Tatsuo Hirakawa
                                     -------------------------------------------
                                      Tatsuo Hirakawa
                                      Deputy President and
                                      Executive Vice President
                                      (Corporate Strategy and Personnel)
14.103-2 Limitations. No awards shall be made as a result of sealed bidding unless— ( a ) Bids have been solicited as required by subpart 14.2;
( b ) Bids have been submitted as required by subpart 14.3;
( c ) The requirements of 1.602-1(b) and part 6 have been met; and
( d ) An award is made to the responsible bidder (see 9.1) whose bid is responsive to the terms of the invitation for bids and is most advantageous to the Government, considering only price and the price-related factors included in the invitation, as provided in subpart 14.4.
[48 FR 42171, Sept. 19, 1983, as amended at 50 FR 1737, Jan. 11, 1985; 50 FR 52429, Dec. 23, 1985]
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21

- 7268

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. KEYSTON JAMORY WEST, a/k/a Alonzo Green, a/k/a D

- Man, a/k/a D , Defendant

- Appellant

.

No. 21

- 7269

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. KEYSTON JAMORY WEST, a/k/a Alonzo Green, a/k/a D

- Man, a/k/a D , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal s from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia , at Martinsburg

. Gina M. Groh, Chief District Judge. ( 3:00

- cr - 00006

- GMG

- RWT

- 2 ; 3:00

- cr - 00046

- GMG

- RWT

- 2 )

Submitted : March 15, 2022 Decided: March 18, 20222 Before NIEMEYER and RUSHING , Circuit Judges , and SHEDD , Senior Circuit Judge.

Vacated and remand ed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Keyston Jamory West , Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.3 PER CURIAM: Keyston Jamory West appeal s the district court’s order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(d)(3) motion alleging fraud on the court in his criminal proceedings . West’s motion challenged the validity of his convictions and sentence and should have been construed as a successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. See Gonzalez v. Crosby , 545 U.S. 524, 531

- 32 (2005); United States v. Winestock , 340 F.3d 200, 206 (4th Cir. 2 003), abrogated in part on other grounds by United States v. McRae , 793 F.3d 392 (4th Cir. 2015). In the absence of prefiling authorization from this Court, the district court lacked jurisdiction to rule on West’s successive § 2255 motion. See 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3). Accordingly, we vacate the district court’s denial of the Rule 60(d)(3) motion and remand with instructions to dismiss for want of jurisdiction. See Winestock , 340 F.3d at 208. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal cont entions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
VACATED AND REMAND ED
#### In the Matter of Brendan S., an Infant. Chautauqua County Department of Social Services, Respondent; Charity S., Appellant, et al., Respondent.

(Appeal No. 1.)

[834 NYS2d 602]-

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Chautauqua County (Judith S. Claire, J.), entered June 20, 2006 in a proceeding pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b. The order, insofar as appealed from, adjudged that the child is a permanently neglected child and terminated the parental rights of respondent Charity S.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: In each appeal, Charity S. (respondent) appeals from an order that terminated her parental rights with respect to each of her three children based upon a finding of permanent neglect and freed them for adoption. We reject respondent’s contention that Family Court abused its discretion in refusing to enter a suspended judgment with respect to each *1190child *(see generally Matter of Jose R.,*32 AD3d 1284, 1285 [2006], *lv denied*7 NY3d 718 [2006]). The court’s sole concern at the dispositional hearing was the best interests of the children *(see*Family Ct Act § 631; *Matter of Star Leslie*W., 63 NY2d 136, 147 [1984]), and the record of that hearing establishes that respondent lacked space in her home to accommodate the children and that she had no stable employment *(see Matter of Brian*C., 32 AD3d 1224 [2006], *lv denied*7 NY3d 717 [2006]). The record further establishes that the minimal progress made by respondent in addressing her own personal issues was insufficient to establish that she was able to assist the children with their special needs. The court’s determination that respondent was not likely to change sufficiently to enable her to parent the children is entitled to great deference *(see generally Matter of Nathaniel T.,*67 NY2d 838, 842 [1986]; *Matter of Philip D.,*266 AD2d 909 [1999]), and we thus conclude that “any progress that respondent made ‘was not sufficient to warrant any further prolongation of the child[ren]’s unsettled familial status’ ” *(Jose R.,*32 AD3d at 1285). Present—Scudder, P.J., Smith, Fahey, Peradotto and Pine, JJ.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
     By:
    /s/ Adrian MaAdrian MaChief Executive OfficerBy:
    /s/ Greenfield PittsGreenfield PittsChief Financial Officer The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)
and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document.A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided
to Emerson Radio Corp. and will be retained by Emerson Radio Corp. and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 8 (Wednesday, January 13, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 2664]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-00546]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ELECTION ASSISTANCE COMMISSION


Roundtable Discussion; Corrections

AGENCY: U.S. Election Assistance Commission.

ACTION: Notice; corrections.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Election Assistance Commission published a document 
in the Federal Register regarding the scheduled Roundtable Discussion: 
2020 Elections Lessons Learned. The Roundtable Discussion scheduled for 
1:30 p.m.-3:30 p.m. Eastern on Wednesday, January 27, 2021 is 
cancelled. The Notice appeared in the Federal Register of January 8, 
2021, in FR Doc. 2021-0269, on page 1486 in the third column and page 
1487 in the first column.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kristen Muthig, Telephone: (202) 897-
9285, Email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f992948c8d91909eb99c989ad79e968f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="6a01071f1e02030d2a0f0b09440d051c">[email protected]</span></a>.

Amanda Joiner,
Associate Counsel, U.S. Election Assistance Commission.
[FR Doc. 2021-00546 Filed 1-12-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### 1401.602-1 Authority.

Information on the limits of CO's authority shall be maintained by the HCA as required in FAR 1.602-1.
**Exhibit 99.2**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANTTO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connectionwith the Annual Report of Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending December 29, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,David V. Singer, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

|                                                                                      |   |   |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/DAVID V. SINGER                                                                        |   |   |        |
|                                                                                           |   |   |   |
| **David V. Singer****Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer**March 28, 2003 |   |   |   |
#### 1332.006 Reduction or suspension of contract payments under finding of fraud.
### §2243. Sale of photographic prints and maps

The Secretary of Agriculture may dispose of photographic prints (including bromide enlargements), lantern slides, transparencies, blueprints, and forest maps at cost and 10 per centum additional, and condemned property or materials under his charge in the same manner as provided by law for other bureaus.

(Mar. 4, 1907, ch. 2907, 34 Stat. 1270.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 552 of Title 5 prior to the general revision and enactment of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees, by Pub. L. 89–554, §1, Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 378.
#### 1306.303-70 Documentation and legal review of justifications.

The justification for providing for other than full and open competition in accordance with FAR 6.303-2 shall contain sufficient facts and rationale to justify the use of the authority cited and include all of the content set forth in FAR 6.303-2 as appropriate for the cited authority. If the estimated value of the procurement is over legal review thresholds, review by the Procurement Counsel is required.

[89 FR 59673, July 23, 2024]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6,1

Eastern Division

Justin D. Reed

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:12−cv−00873

Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman

Norfolk Southern Railway Company

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Monday, August 11, 2014:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jeffrey T. Gilbert: Settlement conference

held on 8/11/14. The parties resolved the case. The parties have a status hearing before the

District Judge on 8/25/14 and hope to have a settlement agreement signed by that time.

All matters relating to the referral of this case having been resolved, this matter is returned

to the District Judge. Referral terminated. Mailed notice (ber, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:12-cv-00873 Document #: 72 Filed: 08/11/14 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:434