alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 99.2**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In conditionwith the Quarterly Report on Form 10-K of Polydex Pharmaceuticals Limited (the“Company”) for the period ended January 31, 2003 as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Sharon L.Wardlaw, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to section906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)  the report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

(2)  the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultof operations of the Company.

 

 
| By /s/  Sharon L. Wardlaw |   |
|--------------------------------|--------|
| Sharon L.  Wardlaw,            |
| Chief  Financial Officer       |
| May 16, 2003                   |

 

 

----
#### 1345.604 Disposal of surplus property.

Surplus property shall be disposed of in accordance with procedures outlined in the DOC Personal Property Management Manual.
#### § 757.3 Regulatory authority.

The regulations published in 31 CFR Chapter IX control the collection and settlement of affirmative claims. This section supplements the material contained in those regulations. Where this section conflicts with the materials and procedure published in 31 CFR Chapter IX, the latter controls.

[57 FR 5072, Feb. 12, 1992, as amended at 72 FR 53427, Sept. 19, 2007]
### §6513. Organic plan

#### (a) In general

A producer or handler seeking certification under this chapter shall submit an organic plan to the certifying agent and the State organic certification program (if applicable), and such plan shall be reviewed by the certifying agent who shall determine if such plan meets the requirements of the programs.

#### (b) Crop production farm plan

#### (1) Soil fertility

An organic plan shall contain provisions designed to foster soil fertility, primarily through the management of the organic content of the soil through proper tillage, crop rotation, and manuring.

#### (2) Manuring

#### (A) Inclusion in organic plan

An organic plan shall contain terms and conditions that regulate the application of manure to crops.

#### (B) Application of manure

Such organic plan may provide for the application of raw manure only to—

(i) any green manure crop;

(ii) any perennial crop;

(iii) any crop not for human consumption; and

(iv) any crop for human consumption, if such crop is harvested after a reasonable period of time determined by the certifying agent to ensure the safety of such crop, after the most recent application of raw manure, but in no event shall such period be less than 60 days after such application.

#### (C) Contamination by manure

Such organic plan shall prohibit raw manure from being applied to any crop in a way that significantly contributes to water contamination by nitrates or bacteria.

#### (c) Livestock plan

An organic livestock plan shall contain provisions designed to foster the organic production of livestock consistent with the purposes of this chapter.

#### (d) Mixed crop livestock production

An organic plan may encompass both the crop production and livestock production requirements in subsections (b) and (c) if both activities are conducted by the same producer.

#### (e) Handling plan

An organic handling plan shall contain provisions designed to ensure that agricultural products that are sold or labeled as organically produced are produced and handled in a manner that is consistent with the purposes of this chapter.

#### (f) Management of wild crops

An organic plan for the harvesting of wild crops shall—

(1) designate the area from which the wild crop will be gathered or harvested;

(2) include a 3 year history of the management of the area showing that no prohibited substances have been applied;

(3) include a plan for the harvesting or gathering of the wild crops assuring that such harvesting or gathering will not be destructive to the environment and will sustain the growth and production of the wild crop; and

(4) include provisions that no prohibited substances will be applied by the producer.

#### (g) Limitation on content of plan

An organic plan shall not include any production or handling practices that are inconsistent with this chapter.

(Pub. L. 101–624, title XXI, §2114, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 3943.)
#### 1252.242-74 Contract Audit Support.

As prescribed in 1242.170, insert the following clause:

# Contract Audit Support (NOV 2022)

The Government may at its sole discretion utilize certified public accountant(s) to provide contract audit services in lieu of the cognizant government audit agency to accomplish the contract administration requirements of FAR parts 32 and 42 under the terms and conditions of this contract. The audit services contractor reviewing the Contractor's accounting systems and data will perform this function in accordance with contract provisions which prohibit disclosure of proprietary financial data or use of such data for any purpose other than to perform the required audit services. The Contractor shall provide access to accounting systems, records, and data to the audit services contractor like that provided to the cognizant government auditor.

(End of clause)
Appeal No. 75-3.

#### Patricia A. Amaral *v.*Manuel Amaral, Jr.

*Paul J. DiMaio,*for appellant. *Robert R. Nocera,*for appellee.

Motion of appellee to dismiss the appeal and motion of appellant’s counsel to withdraw are assigned to the calendar for April 7, 1975 for argument.
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk April 23, 2012

h0416 

# Order

April 23, 2012

144283

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 144283 COA: 306296 Macomb CC: 2010-001602 FC JASON WILLIAM EDWARDS, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the November 23, 2011 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.
#### Leroy Fitzgerald *v.*James M. Troy et al.

No appearance by counsel for either party.

Decided December 3, 1974

The plaintiff’s motion to dismiss the appeal from the Superior Court for the judicial district of Waterbury is dismissed.
### §439a. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, July 2, 1948, ch. 818, §2, 62 Stat. 1234, authorized Secretary of Agriculture to operate plants under former sections 439 to 439e of this title, and was omitted from the Code as obsolete.
#### RIGAS, Respondent, v. LIVINGSTON et al., Appellants.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

November 20, 1903.)

Action by Peter Rigas against George R. Livingston and others.

No opinion. Motion granted for leave to go to Court of Appeals upon giving undertaking. Question to be settled upon settlement of order.
Case: 1:11-cv-09207 Document #: 11 Filed: 10/12/12 Page 1 of 4 PageID #:51
Case: 1:11-cv-09207 Document #: 11 Filed: 10/12/12 Page 2 of 4 PageID #:52
Case: 1:11-cv-09207 Document #: 11 Filed: 10/12/12 Page 3 of 4 PageID #:53
Case: 1:11-cv-09207 Document #: 11 Filed: 10/12/12 Page 4 of 4 PageID #:54
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<CIK> 0000032379
<NAME> ELIZABETHTOWN WATER CO
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      583,462
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                         80
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                          33,398
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                        37,910
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 654,850
<COMMON>                                        15,741
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      128,284
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                             55,117
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 199,142
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     12,000
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           231,955
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                              15,000
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                       30
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 196,723
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  654,850
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                       32,739
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                             2,892
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      20,513
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      23,405
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                          9,334
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                 231
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                   9,565
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         3,878
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,687
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        203
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                    5,484
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                         4,238
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                        3,713
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                          19,872
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0<F1>
<FN>
<F1>All amounts in thousands of dollars except per share amounts.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                            5546
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     8045
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (250)
<INVENTORY>                                      18898
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 33270
<PP&E>                                           75464
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (48955)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   69559
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             5695
<BONDS>                                          19633
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        442
<COMMON>                                          1026
<OTHER-SE>                                       31185
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     69559
<SALES>                                          14223
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 14223
<CGS>                                            12041
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     2164
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (514)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 399
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    133
<INCOME-TAX>                                        56
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 77
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        77
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .07
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THIRD
QUARTER ENDED JANUARY 31, 1999 SYNTHETIC BLOOD INTERNATIONAL, INC.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1999
<CASH>                                         170,960
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               266,914
<PP&E>                                         301,592
<DEPRECIATION>                                 236,600
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 489,420
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          569,425
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       512,594
<OTHER-SE>                                   (642,298)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   489,420
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                22,109
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               625,016
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              14,106
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (617,013)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (617,013)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 ($0.012)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 ($0.012)
        

</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 842
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 842 appear at 81 FR 83688, Nov. 22, 2016.

§ 842.37 Who are proper claimants. ( a ) Citizens and inhabitants of the United States. U.S. inhabitants includes dependents of the U.S. military personnel and federal civilian employees temporarily outside the U.S. for purposes of U.S. Government service.
( b ) U.S. military personnel and civilian employees. Note: These personnel are not proper claimants for claims for personal injury or death that occurred incident to their service.
( c ) Foreign military personnel when the damage or injury occurs in the U.S. Do not pay for claims under the Military Claims Act (MCA) for personal injury or death of a foreign military personnel that occurred incident to their service.
( d ) States, state agencies, counties, or municipalities, or their political subdivisions.
( e ) Subrogees of proper claimants to the extent they have paid for the claim in question.
[81 FR 83690, Nov. 22, 2016]
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2 CERTIFICATE OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. section 1350): I, Gregory J. Fisher, Chief Financial Officer of ElkCorp, certify to my knowledge and belief
pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. section 1350) that:  (1)
    The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005, which
this statement accompanies, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    The information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period
ended March 31, 2005 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of ElkCorp. Date: May 6, 2005
    
    
    
    By
    /s/
    
    Gregory J. FisherGregory J. FisherChief Financial Officer
#### Walter T. Petito, Plaintiff, v. Edward. R. Diesel et al., Defendants. (Action No. 1.) Edward J. Bucko, Respondent, v. Edward R. Diesel, Appellant. (Action No. 2.) Edward J. Bucko, Respondent, v. Edward Diesel, Appellant. (Action No. 3.)

In consolidated negligence actions, defendant Diesel appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated February 16, 1960, granting the motions of the plaintiff (in Actions 2 and 3) to sever Action No. 2 and remand it to the Supreme Court, Putnam County; and to sever Action No. 3 and remand it to the Municipal Court of the City of New York, Borough of Queens. Said defendant also appeals from an order, dated March 14, 1960, which purports to deny reargument of the motions which resulted in the order first mentioned. The three actions arose out of an automobile collision in Putnam County. Actions 2 and 3 had been consolidated with Action No. 1, which was pending in the Supreme Court, Queens County, after said appellant, a defendant in the three actions, had duly demanded and moved in Action No. 2 for a change of venue from Putnam County to Queens County upon the ground that the plaintiff in said action is a nonresident and that appellant resides in Queens County. Thereafter, Action No. 1 was settled. Order appealed from, dated March 14, 1960, reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motions for severance and remand of Actions 2 and 3 denied. As a matter of statutory right, appellant is entitled to a trial in Queens County (Civ. Prac. Act, § 182; *Feitel Bag Co.,*v. *Bobinski,*234 App. Div. 879; *Commercial State Bank & Trust Co. of New York*v. *Ritz,*4 A D 2d 674). No facts have been presented which would justify a remand to Putnam County upon the ground of convenience of witnesses. The said order of March 14, 1960 would be nonappealable if it were, in fact, an order denying reargument. The motion for “reargument” was based, however, upon additional facts, which constituted the motion an application for renewal. An order denying a motion for renewal is appealable *(Matter of Band,*273 App. Div. 859). Appeal from original order of February 16,1960, dismissed as academic. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Kleinfeld and Brennan, JJ., concur; Pette, J., not voting.
-1- 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

COURT OF APPEALS 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

 Plaintiff-Appellant, 

UNPUBLISHED 

February 5, 2015 

v No. 314564 

Calhoun Circuit Court 

LORINDA IRENE SWAIN, LC No. 2001-004547-FC 

 Defendant-Appellee. 

Before: STEPHENS, P.J., and HOEKSTRA and METER, JJ. 

STEPHENS, J. (concurring). 

 I concur in the majority’s result and analysis as to the issues of newly discovered 

evidence and a Brady violation. I concur in the result only as to the actual innocence claim 

because while I agree there is no authority for an independent actual innocence standard in 

Michigan, I believe the proofs in this case are such that under a Swain, 288 Mich App at 638, 

standard, this case is one in which it is more likely than not that no reasonable juror would have 

found the defendant guilty. This case is already one with recantations and inconsistencies which, 

with the testimony of Book, would be one where a guilty verdict would more likely than not be 

rendered by a reasonable jury. 

/s/ Cynthia Diane Stephens
§ 776.12 Maintenance of files. Pursuant to SECNAVINST 5211.5 (series) and SECNAVINST 5212.5 (series) ethics complaint records and outside practice of law request files shall be maintained by the Office of the Chief Judge, DoN (Code 05) for judicial conduct matters; the Research and Civil Law Branch, JA Division, HQMC (JAR) for Marine matters; and the Office of the JAG, Administrative Law Division (Code 13) for all other matters. ( a ) Requests for access to such records should be referred to the Office of the Chief Judge, Washington Navy Yard, 1254 Charles Morris Street SE., Suite 320 Washington, DC, 20374-5124; Deputy Assistant Judge Advocate General (Administrative Law), Office of the Judge Advocate General (Code 13), 1322 Patterson Avenue SE Suite 3000, Washington Navy Yard, DC, 20374-5066; or to Head, Research and Civil Law Branch, Office of the Staff Judge Advocate to the Commandant of the Marine Corps, Headquarters United States Marine Corps, 3000 Marine Corps Pentagon (Room 4D556), Washington DC, 20350-3000, as appropriate.
( b ) Local command files regarding professional responsibility complaints will not be maintained. Commanding officers and other supervisory attorneys may, however, maintain personal files but must not share their contents with others.
( c ) All records maintained under this part shall be maintained in accordance with the following procedures established by JAGINST 5801.2 (series) and DON Privacy Act Notice N05813-1: ( 1 ) Records shall be maintained for a minimum of two years;
( 2 ) Records shall be maintained for as long as an attorney remains subject to JAG-imposed limitations on practice; and
( 3 ) Records pertaining to unsubstantiated complaints, or to attorneys who are no longer subject to limitation on practice, shall be destroyed after 10 years.
Exhibit 99.2

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT 

The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Canisco Resources, Inc.

Under date of June 3, 1998, we reported on the consolidated
balance sheets of Canisco Resources, Inc. and subsidiaries as of
March 31, 1998 and 1997, and the related consolidated statements
of operations, shareholders' equity, and cash flows for the years ended
March 31, 1998 and 1997 the six months ended March 31, 1996, and 
the year ended September 30, 1995, as contained in the 
1998 annual report on Form 10-K.  In connection with our audits of the
aforementioned consolidated financial statements, we also audited the
related financial statement schedule as listed in the accompanying
index.  This financial statement schedule is the responsibility of the 
Company's management.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion
on this financial statement schedule based on our audits.

In our opinion, such financial statement schedule, when considered
in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as
a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information 
set forth therein.


KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP


Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
June 3, 1998

Exhibit 99.2