# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A2 1 A1 08 1 . THOMAS LARRY PYBURN v . THE STATE.

Th o m as Py

b u rn was co n v i ct ed o f i n ces t an d sen t en ce d t o 2 0 y ears o f

i m p ri s o n m en t

. W e affi rm ed h i s co n v i ct i o n o n di rect ap p eal

. Pyb u r n v. St a t e , 3 0 1 Ga.

Ap p

. 3 72 (6 87 SE2 d 9 0 9) (2 0 0 9 ). Py b u rn has fi l ed s ev eral a p p eal s i n t h i s Co u rt

. 1

M o s t recen t l y , t h e t ri al co u rt d en i ed Py b u rn ’ s m o t i o n s fo r l eav e t o fi l e an o u t -o f-t i m e

ap p eal an d fo r an ev i d en t i ary heari n g o n h is ou t -o f-t i m e ap peal

. W e lack ju ri s d i ct i o n.

“ An o u t -o f-t i m e a p p e a l i s a ju d i ci al creat i o n t h at s erv es as t h e rem ed y fo r a

fru s t rat ed ri g h t o f ap p eal .” Ki l g o r e v. S t a t e , 3 2 5 Ga. Ap p

. 8 7 4, 8 7 5 (1 ) (7 56 SE2 d 9 )

(2 0 1 4) (p u n ct u at i o n o m i t t ed ). Becau s e Py b u rn al read y has h ad a d i rect ap p eal

, h e i s

n o t en t i t l ed t o an o u t -o f-t i m e ap p eal or an ap p eal o f t he d en i al o f h i s m o t i on fo r l eav e

t o fi l e an o u t -o f-t i m e ap p eal

. See Ri ch a r d s v. S t a t e , 2 7 5 Ga. 1 90

, 1 9 1 (5 6 3 SE2 d 8 5 6 )

1 W e t ran s ferred t o t h e Su p rem e Co u rt Cas e N o

. A1 5 A 2 3 4 1 (ap peal fro m t h e

t ri al co urt ’ s d en i al o f h i s ap p l i cat i o n fo r o ut -o f-t i m e rev iew b y t h e Sen t en ce Rev i ew
Pan el ) (d eci d ed Au g us t 2 6, 2 0 1 5 ) an d Cas e No

. A1 5A2 3 4 2 (ap p eal fro m t h e d en i al

o f h i s p et i t i o n fo r m an d am u s ) d eci d ed Au g u s t 26

, 2 01 5 ). In a s i n gl e o rd er, t h e Su p rem e Co u rt d i s m i s sed Py b u rn ’ s ap p e a l fro m t h e den i al o f m an d am u s rel i ef an d

t ran s ferred Cas e No

. A1 5 A2 3 4 1 b ack t o t hi s Co u rt

, wh i ch we d i s m i s s ed o n Decem b er 1 6

, 2 0 1 5. See Cas e No s

. S1 6 A0 1 8 7

, S1 6 A0 1 8 8 (d eci ded No v em b er 2

, 2 0 1 5 )

. I n 2 0 1 6

, w e d i s m i s s ed Py

b u rn ’ s ap p eal fro m t h e d en i al o f h i s ex t rao rd i n ary m o t i o n fo r

n ew t ri al

. See Cas e No

. A1 6 A1 66 1 (d i sm is s ed J u n e 9

, 2 0 1 6 ). In Cas e No

. A1 8 A2 0 2 1 (d i s m i s sed J u l y 1 9

, 20 1 8 ), we d i s m i s s ed Py b u rn ’ s ap p eal fro m t h e den i al o f h i s

m a n d am u s p et i ti o n s eek i ng t o ch al l en g e h i s in ces t co n vi ct i o n

. Al s o i n 20 1 8

, we d i s m i s s ed Py

b u rn ’ s ap p l i cat i o n fo r d i s cret i o nary rev i ew o f a t ri al co urt ord er d en y i n g h i s m o t i on t o s et as id e ju dg m en t

. See Cas e No

. A1 9 D 0 0 6 4 (d i s m i s s ed Sep t em b er 1 2,

2 0 1 8 ). April 22, 2021(2 0 0 2) (“ [T] h ere is n o ri g h t t o di rect l y ap p eal th e d en i al o f a m o t i o n fo r o u t -o f-t i m e

ap p eal fi l ed b y a cri m in al d ef e n d a n t wh o s e co n v i ct i o n h as b een affi rm ed o n d i rect

ap p eal .”); Ja cks o n v. S ta t e , 2 7 3 Ga. 3 2 0

, 3 2 0 (5 4 0 SE2 d 6 1 2 ) (2 0 0 1) (a d efen d an t “ i s

n o t en t i t l ed t o an ot h er b i t e at t h e ap p l e b y way o f a s eco n d ap p eal ”). Acco rd i n g l y , t h i s

ap p eal i s h ereb y

DISM ISSED. See Ri ch a r d s , 2 75 Ga. at 1 9 1 -1 9 2

.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O f f i c e

, A t la n t a

,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e is a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

.

W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d th e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 04/22/2021