alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 688 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 688

      To suspend the importation of beef and poultry from Brazil.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 21, 2017

  Mr. Tester introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To suspend the importation of beef and poultry from Brazil.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SUSPENSION OF IMPORTATION OF BEEF AND POULTRY FROM BRAZIL.

    Beef, beef products, poultry, and poultry products imported from 
Brazil may not enter the United States during the period beginning on 
the date of the enactment of this Act and ending on the date that is 
120 days after such date of enactment.
                                 <all>
```
---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---
#### In re Petition for Naturalization of Samuel Harry TARAN.

No. 31740.

United States District Court, S. D. Florida, Miami Division.

June 26, 1970.

*768David W. Walters, of Walters, Moore & Costanzo, Miami, Fla., for petitioner.

C. G. Yeager, Acting District Director, Miami, Fla., for Immigration and Naturalization Service of the United States Department of Justice.

ATKINS, District Judge.

The cause before this Court is the Petition for Naturalization of Samuel Harry Taran. Pursuant to the Immigration and Nationality Act, preliminary examinations were held before a Naturalization Examiner and the aforesaid examiner has filed a lengthy, persuasive memorandum in support of his recommendation that the petition be denied.

Under the Immigration and Nationality Act, the petitioner must establish good moral character during the three-year period immediately preceding his petition for naturalization. In Petitioner’s case, the petition was filed on February 9, 1965. Having considered the pleadings and the testimony offered at the hearing, the Court feels that the controlling question in this petition is, “What weight should be given to Petitioner’s statements concerning the background of his indebtedness to the Internal Revenue Service?”

In hearings held in connection with his petition, the petitioner, now 72 years of age, testified that his tax indebtedness was the result of the Internal Revenue Service’s reversing itself as to the validity of a trust created by petitioner. This testimony, however, the examiner found to be false as evidence showed that the validity of the aforementioned trust had not been challenged. These alleged false statements are the principal basis for the examiners adverse recommendation. All parties now agree that the taxes due from petitioner are for monies owed by him for his personal income together with interest and costs. Although admitting that his statements were mistaken, petitioner maintains that he did not have knowledge of the true basis for the assessment. In support thereof, Tom Maxey, Esquire, counsel for petitioner, confirmed that he did not tell petitioner the details of the settlement worked out with the Government.

This Court finds that the statements at issue, when put into perspective by other evidence proffered in this matter, are insufficient to taint the petition of Mr. Taran. The Court is aware that the lifetime record of petitioner is far from meritorious. The evidence, however, reveals that he has not been arrested or charged with any crime since 1956. It is therefore

Ordered and adjudged by this Court that the Taran petition for naturalization be approved and that the petitioner be naturalized as a citizen of the United States.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

CENTRAL STATES, SOUTHEAST AND )

SOUTHWEST AREAS PENSION FUND, et al., )

)

Plaintiffs, )

)

v. ) Case No. 12 C 604

)

KENNETH B. SEWELL, WENDY F. SEWELL, )

and KING AUTOMOTIVE CENTER, INC. )

)

Defendants. )

MEMORANDUM ORDER

As a result of printing out a list of all pending motions in cases on this Court’s calendar, its

always-alert minute clerk spotted a Fed. R. Civ. P. (“Rule”) 12(b)(6) motion that had been filed in

this action back on May 17 seeking to dismiss the First Amended Complaint (“FAC”). Unfortunately

that filing had violated not just one but two of this District Court’s LRs, one requiring the delivery

of a paper copy of every electronically filed document to the chambers of the judge assigned to the

case and the other requiring that every motion be noticed up for presentment not later than 14 1

days after its filing. Those provisions are obviously responsive to the fact that neither judges nor

minute clerks have their brains wired into the electronic filing system, so that responsibility for

alerting the assigned judge to the existence of a motion (for example) and for providing a hard copy

are understandably imposed on counsel rather than on court personnel.

Because defense counsel in this case offices in St. Louis, this Court is pleased to

accommodate him by allowing him to participate in the case’s periodic status hearings

telephonically rather than in person. That however doesn’t lessen the obligation of any non-

 That LR has been fortified by the opening paragraph in this Court’s website, which calls 1

specific attention to that requirement and provides that a lawyer’s failure to comply with its terms

will give rise to the imposition of a fine – usually $100.

Case: 1:12-cv-00604 Document #: 17 Filed: 06/20/12 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:53
resident lawyer to become aware of local rules of practice (although the customary $100 fine will

not be imposed in this instance).

To turn to the substance of the motion to dismiss, which challenges the sufficiency of the

FAC to state a claim for withdrawal liability under ERISA, defendants must of course accept the

employee benefit fund plaintiff’s allegations as gospel – but in this instance defense counsel has

essentially sought to substitute a fact pleading regime for the notice pleading concept embodied

in federal practice. It is true that what this Court refers to as the Twombly-Iqbal canon has

introduced a requirement of “plausibility,” but that has not created such a dramatic shift as the

current motion would suggest.

Accordingly the motion to dismiss is denied, not just for its procedural violations but as a

substantive matter as well. This Court expects defense counsel to participate in the next status

hearing (previously set to be held at 9 a.m. June 28) and, in the meantime, to begin drafting an

answer for prompt filing.

Milton I. Shadur

Senior United States District Judge

Date: June 20, 2012

- 2 -

Case: 1:12-cv-00604 Document #: 17 Filed: 06/20/12 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:54
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Synthetic Blood International, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended October 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David H. Johnson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                  | 
|----------------- | 
|December 18, 2003 | 
|                  | 
|                  |
#### John O. Gaines v. Frisbee J. Fuller, as Administrator.

Motion for leave to appeal as a poor person granted insofar as to permit the appeal to be heard upon a typewritten or mimeographed record, without printing the same, and upon typewritten or mimeographed appellant’s points, upon condition that the appellant serves one copy of the typewritten or mimeographed record and *one*copy of the typewritten or mimeographed appellant’s points on the attorney for defendants-respondents and files 6 typewritten copies or 19 mimeographed copies of both the record on appeal and appellant’s points with this court. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, Valente, McNally and Eager, JJ.
#### 1422.101-4 Removal of items from contractors' facilities affected by work stoppages.

Prior to initiating any action for removal of items from contractors' facilities, the CO shall obtain advice from SOL.
### §6933. Office of Risk Management

#### (a) Establishment

The Secretary shall establish and maintain in the Department an independent Office of Risk Management.

#### (b) Functions of Office of Risk Management

The Office of Risk Management shall have jurisdiction over the following functions:

(1) Supervision of the Federal Crop Insurance Corporation.

(2) Administration and oversight of all aspects, including delivery through local offices of the Department, of all programs authorized under the Federal Crop Insurance Act (7 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.).

(3) Any pilot or other programs involving revenue insurance, risk management savings accounts, or the use of the futures market to manage risk and support farm income that may be established under the Federal Crop Insurance Act or other law.

(4) Such other functions as the Secretary considers appropriate.

#### (c) Administrator

#### (1) Appointment

The Office of Risk Management shall be headed by an Administrator who shall be appointed by the Secretary.

#### (2) Manager

The Administrator of the Office of Risk Management shall also serve as Manager of the Federal Crop Insurance Corporation.

#### (d) Resources

#### (1) Functional coordination

Certain functions of the Office of Risk Management, such as human resources, public affairs, and legislative affairs, may be provided by a consolidation of such functions under the Under Secretary of Agriculture for Farm Production and Conservation.

#### (2) Minimum provisions

Notwithstanding paragraph (1) or any other provision of law or order of the Secretary, the Secretary shall provide the Office of Risk Management with human and capital resources sufficient for the Office to carry out its functions in a timely and efficient manner.

(Pub. L. 103–354, title II, §226A, as added Pub. L. 104–127, title I, §194(a), Apr. 4, 1996, 110 Stat. 945; amended Pub. L. 115–334, title XII, §§12405(a), 12415(a), Dec. 20, 2018, 132 Stat. 4975, 4981.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Federal Crop Insurance Act, referred to in subsec. (b)(2), (3), is subtitle A of title V of act Feb. 16, 1938, ch. 30, 52 Stat. 72, which is classified generally to subchapter I (§1501 et seq.) of chapter 36 of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 1501 of this title and Tables.

#### Amendments

2018—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 115–334, §12415(a), substituted "The Secretary" for "Subject to subsection (e), the Secretary".

Subsec. (d)(1). Pub. L. 115–334, §12405(a), substituted "Under Secretary of Agriculture for Farm Production and Conservation" for "Under Secretary of Agriculture for Farm and Foreign Agricultural Services".
### §1625. Authorization for verification of eligibility for State and local public benefits

A State or political subdivision of a State is authorized to require an applicant for State and local public benefits (as defined in section 1621(c) of this title) to provide proof of eligibility.

(Pub. L. 104–193, title IV, §413, as added Pub. L. 105–33, title V, §5307(a), Aug. 5, 1997, 111 Stat. 602.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective, except as otherwise provided, as if included in the enactment of title IV of the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996, Pub. L. 104–193, see section 5308 of Pub. L. 105–33, set out as an Effective Date of 1997 Amendment note under section 1612 of this title.
#### 1428.311-1 Contract clause.

The CO shall modify the clause at FAR 52.228-7, Insurance—Liability to Third Persons, in accordance with 1452.228-7, and insert in solicitations and contracts as prescribed in FAR 28.311-1.
April 1st , 2013

Sirs

U.S. Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E.

Washington, D.C. 20590

REF. Comments in Support of Resolution 787

To Whom It May Concern,

By means of the following communication, we want to confirm t hat Taca International Airline, S.A., Avianca

and TACA Airlines, support IATA  ́s Resolution 787

– termed as New Distribution Capability

– NDC

- taking into

account that it constitutes an updated data transmission standard based on XML, and thus it will make it

easier, faster and more economic to provide the customer with more information about fare alternatives,

ancillary services, on board amenities and graphics such as pictures and seat maps

.

Given the fact that NDC will further include new technology us ing messaging through XML based protocols and

web services that will enable transparency and consistency in airline pricing, products and services across all

channels and greater customer personalization and o ffering in the shopping process, we consider th at we

should support the initiative.

In addition to the above

, it is important to bear in mind that carriers and travel agents need real time dynamics

that allow interactive contact with their customers; and through the use of NDC, it seems that we will be able

to avoid current constraints with existing EDIFACT messages.

NDC will also enable a dynamic distribution model that will provide a better access to distribution channels for

providers and customers that is currently possible only through the airli nes’ own websites.

Yours sincerely,

María Elena Arévalo

Aeronautic al Affairs manager

Mariaelena.arevalo @aviancataca.com

TACA International Airlines, S.A.
```

[House Document 107-22]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

107th Congress, 1st Session - - - - - - - - - - - House Document 107-22

 
     CERTIFICATION FOR AN EXPORT TO THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA

                               __________

                             COMMUNICATION

                                  from

                   THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES

                              transmitting

HIS CERTIFICATION THAT THE EXPORT TO THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA OF 
  A BEAM CENTERLINE (LINEAR ACCELERATOR), IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE 
  PROVISIONS OF SECTION 1512 OF THE NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT 
  FOR FISCAL YEAR 1999

January 20, 2001.--Referred to the Committee on International Relations 
                       and ordered to be printed
                               __________

                    U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE
89-011                     WASHINGTON : 2001

                                           The White House,
                                      Washington, January 11, 2001.
Hon. J. Dennis Hastert,
Speaker of the House of Representatives,
Washington, DC.
    Dear Mr. Speaker: In accordance with the provisions of 
section 1512 of the National Defense Authorization Act for 
Fiscal Year 1999 (Public Law 105-261), I hereby certify that 
the export to the People's Republic of China of a beam 
centerline (linear accelerator):
          (1) Is not detrimental to the United States space 
        launch industry; and
          (2) The material and equipment, including any 
        indirect technical benefit that could be derived from 
        such export, will not measurably improve the missile or 
        space launch capabilities of the People's Republic of 
        China.
            Sincerely,
                                                William J. Clinton.

                                  

```
§ 552.124 Transportation of privately owned weapons and ammunition. ( a ) Privately owned firearms and ammunition will be transported in the following manner: ( 1 ) Weapons, other than weapons being transported into Fort Lewis for the first time, may be carried in vehicles only when traveling to and from an authorized hunting area during hunting seasons or enroute to or from authorized target practice and matches.
( 2 ) The carrying of loaded privately owned weapons in a vehicle is prohibited.
( 3 ) Privately owned weapons carried in a vehicle will be secured in the trunk or encased and carried in such a manner that they will not be readily available to the driver or passenger.
( b ) Personnel who remove privately owned weapons from Fort Lewis or sub-installations will comply with applicable Federal, state, and local laws pertaining to the ownership, possession and/or registration of weapons.
II 

Calendar No. 102 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 734 

[Report No. 115–83] 

To extend a project of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission involving 

the Cannonsville Dam. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 27, 2017 

Mrs. GILLIBRAND (for herself and Mr. SCHUMER) introduced the following 

bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 

Natural Resources 

MAY 24, 2017 

Reported by Ms. MURKOWSKI, with amendments 

[Omit the part struck through and insert the part printed in italic] 

A BILL 

To extend a project of the Federal Energy Regulatory 

Commission involving the Cannonsville Dam. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 734 RS

1 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF TIME FOR A FEDERAL ENERGY 

2 REGULATORY COMMISSION PROJECT IN3 VOLVING CANNONSVILLE DAM. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding the time period 

5 specified in section 13 of the Federal Power Act (16 

6 U.S.C. 806) that would otherwise apply to the Federal En7 ergy Regulatory Commission project numbered 13287, the 

8 Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (referred to in 

9 this section as the ‘‘Commission’’) may, at the request of 

10 the licensee for the project, and after reasonable notice, 

11 in accordance with the good faith, due diligence, and pub12 lic interest requirements of that section and the proce13 dures of the Commission under that section, extend the 

14 time period during which the licensee is required to com15 mence construction of the project for up to 4 consecutive 

16 2-year periods after the required date of the commence17 ment of construction described in Article 301 of the li18 cense. 

19 (b) REINSTATEMENT OF EXPIRED LICENSE.— 

20 (1) IN GENERAL.—If the required date of pe21 riod required for the commencement of construction 

22 of the project described in subsection (a) has expired 

23 prior to the date of enactment of this Act, the Com24 mission may reinstate the license effective as of that 

25 date of expiration. 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 734 RS

1 (2) EXTENSION.—If the Commission reinstates 

2 the license under paragraph (1), the first extension 

3 authorized under subsection (a) shall take effect on 

4 the date of that expiration. 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 102 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 734 

[Report No. 115–83] 

A BILL 

To extend a project of the Federal Energy ReguDam. latory Commission involving the Cannonsville 

MAY 24, 2017 

Reported with amendments 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
AFS-10-286-E 

June 10, 2010 

 Exemption No. 9758A 

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2008-0930 

Mr. David C. Hoffmeister 

Director of Training 

Great Lakes Aviation, Ltd. 

1022 Airport Parkway 

Cheyenne, WY 82001 

Dear Mr. Hoffmeister: 

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption No. 9758. 

It explains the basis for our decision and describes its effect. 

The Basis for Our Decision 

By letter dated May 19, 2010, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on 

behalf of Great Lakes Aviation, Ltd. (Great Lakes), for an extension of Exemption No. 9758. 

That exemption from § 121.434(c)(1)(ii) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations allows 

Great Lakes to substitute a qualified and authorized check airman in place of an FAA training 

inspector to observe a qualifying pilot in command (PIC) who is completing initial or upgrade 

training specified in § 121.424 during at least one flight leg that includes a takeoff and a 

landing. 

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons 

relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption. 

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested extension of the exemption would not set a 

precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Great Lakes. 
 2

Our Decision 

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 9758 

remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the 

authority provided by 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has 

delegated to me, I grant your petition. 

The Effect of Our Decision 

Our decision extends the termination date of Exemption No. 9758 to October 31, 2012, unless 

sooner superseded or rescinded. 

All conditions and limitations of Exemption No. 9758 remain the same. This letter must be 

attached to, and is a part of, Exemption No. 9758. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Raymond Towles 

Acting Director, Flight Standards 

 Service
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Federal Screw Works (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Quarterly
Report"), I, Thomas ZurSchmiede, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or
78o(d)); and

         (2) The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.


April 14, 2004
                                        /s/ Thomas ZurSchmiede
                                        ----------------------------------
                                        Thomas ZurSchmiede, President and Chief
                                        Executive Officer of Federal Screw Works
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Jesse M. Clemens, Appellant, against Superior Bearing & Bronze Co. et al., Respondents. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.

Motion to dismiss appeal granted, by default, without costs. Present — Bergan, P. J., Coon, Gibson, Herlihy and-Reynolds, JJ.