alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### 1252.217-79 Delays.

As prescribed at 1217.7001(b), insert the following clause:

# Delays (NOV 2022)

When during the performance of this contract the Contractor is required to delay work on a vessel temporarily, due to orders or actions of the Government respecting stoppage of work to permit shifting the vessel, stoppage of hot work to permit bunkering, stoppage of work due to embarking or debarking passengers and loading or discharging cargo, and the Contractor is not given sufficient advance notice or is otherwise unable to avoid incurring additional costs on account thereof, an equitable adjustment shall be made in the price of the contract pursuant to the “Changes” clause.

(End of clause)
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Victoria Ranno, Appellant. Martin P. Catherwood, as Industrial Commissioner, Respondent.

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board holding claimant disqualified from receiving benefits on the grounds she refused, without good cause, to accept employment for which she was reasonably fitted by training and experience (Labor Law, § 593, subd. 2) and requiring repayment of $27.50 previously received on the ground her failure to disclose the offer constituted a willful concealment of a material fact thereby negating her rights to retain the benefits she received. (Labor Law, §§ 594, 597, subd. 4.) The record contains evidence that on April 6, 1962 claimant refused re-employment on the job she had held prior to her dismissal therefrom on February 2, 1962 and that on April 12, 1962 she signed the usual weekly certification indicating that she was ready and available to work and that she had disclosed all offers of employment made to her. Claimant stated that she refused to return to her former employment because she was more interested in working as a dietician, which work she had undertaken on a part-time basis at a nearby hospital. There is also evidence that claimant was limited to part-time work as a dietician because of her lack of experience and her inability to be available for full-time day work, the normal period of employment for dieticians. In *Matter of Delgado*[Corsi] (278 App. Div. 237, 238), this court stated the rule applicable here as follows: “ The statute does not allow so selective a refusal of employment. It prohibits the payment of benefits where, without good cause, there is a refusal of an offer of employment for which a claimant ‘is reasonably fitted by training and experience’ with exception not germane here (Unemployment Insurance Law [Labor Law, art. 18], § 593, subd. 2). Where a person is reasonably fitted for more than one kind of employment he does not bring himself within the benefits provided by the statute if he refuses one kind merely because he prefers the other.” (See *Matter of*
      *722
      *Reiger [Catherwood],*17 A D 2d 269.) Commendably claimant could seek advancement to a higher paying position, but she had no right to refuse suitable full-time employment to continue part-time employment so as to gain experience in such employment or because it was more to her liking and at the same time continue to draw unemployment insurance. Similarly there is substantial evidence to support the board’s finding that claimant’s failure to disclose the offer of re-employment was willful within the meaning of subdivision 4 of section 597. (See *Matter of Bailey [Catherwood],*18 A D 2d 727, 728.) Decision affirmed, without costs. Gibson, P. J., Reynolds, Taylor, Aulisi and Hamm, JJ., concur.
AO 450 (Rev. 11/11) Judgment in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division

Helferich Patent Licensing, LLC. )

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff

v. Civil Action No. 11 C 9143

J.C. Penney Company

Defendant

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION

The court has ordered that (check one):

 the plaintiff (name) recover from the

defendant (name) the amount of

dollars ($ ), which includes prejudgment

interest at the rate of %, plus post judgment interest at the rate % per annum, along with costs.

 the plaintiff recover nothing, the action be dismissed on the merits, and the defendant (name)

recover costs from the plaintiff (name)

.

X other: For the reasons stated in the Court’s 8/14/13 memorandum opinion and order, defendants’ motion for

summary judgment on the issue of patent exhaustion is granted [94], and HPL’s motion for summary judgment is

denied [110]. Judgment is entered in favor of defendants, and HPL’s claims of patent infringement are dismissed .

This action was (check one):

 tried by a jury with Judge presiding, and the jury has

rendered a verdict.

 tried by Judge without a jury and the above decision

was reached.

X decided by Judge Darrah on a motions for summary

judgment.

.

Date: Aug 14, 2013 Thomas G. Bruton, CLERK OF COURT

Melanie A. Foster

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

Case: 1:11-cv-09143 Document #: 144 Filed: 08/14/13 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:3802
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 21-10173

Summary Calendar

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Nicolas Garcia-Lopez, 

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

No. 4:20-CR-230-1

Before Smith, Stewart, and Graves, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Nicolas GarciaLopez moves to withdraw and has filed a brief per Anders v. California, 

386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). 

Garcia-Lopez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances 

set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

November 3, 2021

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 21-10173 Document: 00516079909 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/03/2021
No. 21-10173

2

relevant portions of the record. 

We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no 

nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion to withdraw 

is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and 

the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Case: 21-10173 Document: 00516079909 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/03/2021
Fiscal Year 2014 Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies - DELAWARE

FY 2014 Title I

LEA ID District Allocation*

1000080 Appoquinimink School District 903,676

1001240 Brandywine School District 2,345,132

1000180 Caesar Rodney School District 2,871,600

1000170 Cape Henlopen School District 1,670,033

1000190 Capital School District 3,948,969

1000200 Christina School District 7,704,016

1000230 Colonial School District 4,383,056

1000270 Delmar School District 364,305

1000680 Indian River School District 4,237,077

1000790 Lake Forest School District 1,164,094

1000810 Laurel School District 977,769

1001080 Milford School District 1,571,480

1001300 Red Clay Consolidated School District 6,339,526

1001530 Seaford School District 3,114,736

1001620 Smyrna School District 946,233

1001850 Woodbridge School District 1,508,950

1099999 PART D SUBPART 2 0

* Actual amounts received by LEAs will be smaller than shown here due to State-level adjustments to Federal Title I allocations. States adjust

 allocations, for example, to reflect LEA boundary changes or the creation of new LEAs, including charter school LEAs, that are not accounted

 for in the statutory calculations. States also are permitted to reserve, for administration, up to 1 percent of the allocations they would receive

 if $14 billion were appropriated and generally must reserve 4 percent in fiscal year 2014 for school improvement activities. These 

 adjustments will reduce the actual amounts available.
14.402-3 Postponement of openings. ( a ) A bid opening may be postponed even after the time scheduled for bid opening (but otherwise in accordance with 14.208) and— ( 1 ) The contracting officer has reason to believe that the bids of an important segment of bidders have been delayed in the mails, or in the communications system specified for transmission of bids, for causes beyond their control and without their fault or negligence (e.g., flood, fire, accident, weather conditions, strikes, or Government equipment blackout or malfunction when bids are due); or
( 2 ) Emergency or unanticipated events interrupt normal governmental processes so that the conduct of bid openings as scheduled is impractical.
( b ) At the time of a determination to postpone a bid opening under subparagraph (a)(1) above, an announcement of the determination shall be publicly posted. If practical before issuance of a formal amendment of the invitation, the determination shall be otherwise communicated to prospective bidders who are likely to attend the scheduled bid opening.
( c ) In the case of paragraph (a)(2) of this section, and when urgent Government requirements preclude amendment of the solicitation as prescribed in 14.208, the time specified for opening of bids will be deemed to be extended to the same time of day specified in the solicitation on the first work day on which normal Government processes resume. In such cases, the time of actual bid opening shall be deemed to be the time set for bid opening for the purpose of determining “late bids” under 14.304. A note should be made on the abstract of bids or otherwise added to the file explaining the circumstances of the postponement.
[48 FR 42171, Sept. 19, 1983, as amended at 60 FR 34738, July 3, 1995; 61 FR 31619, June 20, 1996]
#### J. Romeo Miglietta et al., v. Kennecott Copper Corporation.

Motion to dismiss appeal from an order denying a motion to dismiss a complaint for insufficiency is granted, without costs. The service of an amended complaint renders the appeal —involving the original complaint — moot. *(Byrne*v. *Osias,*13 A D 2d 478; *Millard*v. *Delaware, Lackawanna & Western R. R. Co.,*204 App. Div. 80; *Rockville Bark Homes*v. *Blumenfeld,*282 App. Div. 895.) The complaint in question does contain amendments. This suffices to supplant the old complaint and *the*fact that it has supplemental matter is immaterial. Concur—Breitel, J. P., Valente, McNally, Eager and Steuer, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1550 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1550

  Designating October 23, 2024, as ``AADC Deficiency Awareness Day''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 22, 2024

    Mr. Murphy (for himself and Mr. Lynch) submitted the following 
 resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Designating October 23, 2024, as ``AADC Deficiency Awareness Day''.

Whereas a rare disease is a disease or disorder that affects a small number of 
        patients, currently defined as a condition that affects fewer than 
        200,000 people in the United States at any given time;
Whereas there are more than 7,000 rare diseases that altogether affect an 
        estimated 25 million to 30 million people in the United States;
Whereas children make up more than half of the estimated 25 million to 35 
        million people in the United States living with a rare disease;
Whereas Aromatic L-Amino Acid Decarboxylase (``AADC'') Deficiency is a genetic 
        neurologic rare disease that severely debilitates a patient's 
        development, motor skills, growth, cognitive and language skills, and 
        limits a patient's life;
Whereas AADC Deficiency results from an inherited genetic disease where patients 
        lack the AADC enzyme required to create dopamine, without which, 
        patients will never achieve motor milestones like holding their heads 
        up, sitting, and standing, nor will they develop the ability to 
        communicate or perform the most basic life functions;
Whereas patients are diagnosed through genetic and other biochemical tests;
Whereas patients suffering from AADC Deficiency often have unexplained low 
        muscle tone and experience other symptoms like developmental delays and 
        involuntary eye movements;
Whereas there have been approximately 200 cases of AADC Deficiency reported 
        worldwide;
Whereas AADC Deficiency is often mistaken for other diseases like cerebral 
        palsy, epilepsy, or autism;
Whereas the Congress can raise awareness of AADC Deficiency in the public and 
        medical community in the United States;
Whereas awareness of AADC Deficiency will help patients who may be experiencing 
        the symptoms of AADC Deficiency recognize their disease and pursue 
        appropriate treatment; and
Whereas improved awareness and education around AADC Deficiency will increase 
        medical representation for individuals suffering from AADC Deficiency: 
        Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) designates ``AADC Deficiency Awareness Day''; and
            (2) recognizes the importance of improving awareness and 
        education around AADC Deficiency.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                             128
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,259
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,209
<INVENTORY>                                     59,922
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                74,383
<PP&E>                                          40,451
<DEPRECIATION>                                  17,416
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 110,218
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          107,135
<BONDS>                                            140
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           281
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   110,218
<SALES>                                         55,749
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                55,749
<CGS>                                           42,479
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   42,479
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                19,399
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,375
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 712
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (7,568)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (7,568)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (7,568)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.27)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.27)
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                                         Exhibit 99(a)

                                       TXU GAS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
                                 CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED INCOME
                                                 (Unaudited)


                                                                                   Twelve Months Ended
                                                                                       June 30, 2003
                                                                                  --------------------
                                                                                  (millions of dollars)



<S>                                                                                        <C>
Operating revenues.....................................................                    $  1,297
                                                                                           --------
Operating expenses:
    Gas purchased for resale...........................................                         768
    Operation and maintenance..........................................                         271
    Depreciation and other amortization................................                          73
    Taxes other than income............................................                          88
                                                                                           --------
        Total operating expenses.......................................                       1,200
                                                                                           --------

Operating income ......................................................                          97

Other income...........................................................                          10

Other deductions.......................................................                          36

Interest income........................................................                           1

Interest expense and other charges.....................................                          50
                                                                                           --------

Income before income taxes.............................................                          22

Income tax expense.....................................................                           7
                                                                                           --------

Net income.............................................................                          15

Preferred stock dividends..............................................                           4
                                                                                           --------

Net income applicable to common stock..................................                    $     11
                                                                                           ========

</TABLE>
Exhibit 23.1







                         Consent of Independent Auditors







The Board of Directors and Shareholders
UQM Technologies, Inc.:

Our report dated May 18, 2001, states that we did not audit the financial
statements of Taiwan UQM Electric Co., Ltd. (a 38.25% owned investee company).
The financial statements of Taiwan UQM Electric Co, Ltd. were audited by other
auditors whose report has been furnished to us, and our opinion, insofar as it
relates to the amounts included for Taiwan UQM Electric, Co., Ltd. for the year
ended March 31, 1999 is based solely on the report of the other auditors.

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements on
Forms S-8 (Nos. 33-23113, 33-24071, 33-34612, 33-35055, 33-34613, 33-41325,
33-64852, 33-47454, 33-81430 and 33-92288) and in the registration statements on
Forms S-3 (Nos. 33-6116, 33-63399, 333-01919, 333-13883, 333-44597, 333-23843,
33-50393, 333-52861, 333-67313 and 333-78525) of UQM Technologies, Inc. of our
report dated May 18, 2001 relating to the consolidated balance sheets of UQM
Technologies, Inc. and subsidiaries as of March 31, 2001 and 2000, and the
related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity and
comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended March 31, 2001, which report appears in the March 31,
2001 Annual Report on Form-K of UQM Technologies, Inc.


                                                                  /s/KPMG LLP
                                                                     KPMG LLP
Exhibit 24.1 POWER OF ATTORNEY


Each person whose signature appears below, hereby authorizes and appoints Geoffrey Talbot as his attorney-in-fact with full power of substitution and resubstitution, to sign and file on his behalf individually and in each such capacity stated, below, the Annual Report of Statmon Technologies Corp. on Form 10-KSB for the year ending March 31, 2004, and any amendments thereto to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, The NASDAQ Stock Market or similar body, and otherwise, as fully as such person could do in person, hereby verifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact, or their or his substitutes or substitute, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.





**Signatures**

**Title**

**Date**/s/ GEOFFREY P. TALBOT

President and Chief Executive Officer and a Director

September
13, 2004GEOFFREY P. TALBOT/s/ PETER J. UPFOLD

Treasurer, Secretary and a Director

September
13, 2004PETER J. UPFOLD/s/ LEONARD SILVERMAN

Director

September
13, 2004LEONARD SILVERMAN/s/ ROBERT B. FIELDS

Director

September
13, 2004ROBERT B. FIELDS
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 531 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 531

 To amend the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 
to designate a portion of the Edward T. Breathitt Parkway as Interstate 
                              Route I-169.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 6, 2017

   Mr. Paul introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 
to designate a portion of the Edward T. Breathitt Parkway as Interstate 
                              Route I-169.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ROUTE DESIGNATION.

    (a) High Priority Corridor.--Section 1105(c) of the Intermodal 
Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 (105 Stat. 2032; 129 
Stat. 1422) is amended by adding at the end the following:
            ``(89) Edward T. Breathitt (Pennyrile) Parkway from its 
        intersection with Interstate Route 24 to its intersection with 
        Interstate 69 and the Western Kentucky Parkway.''.
    (b) Inclusion of Certain Routes on Interstate System.--Section 
1105(e)(5)(A) of the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act 
of 1991 (109 Stat. 598; 118 Stat. 293; 129 Stat. 1422) is amended in 
the first sentence by striking ``and subsection (c)(83)'' and inserting 
``subsection (c)(83), and subsection (c)(89)''.
    (c) Designation.--Section 1105(e)(5)(C)(i) of the Intermodal 
Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 (109 Stat. 598; 126 Stat. 
427; 129 Stat. 1422) is amended by adding at the end the following: 
``The route referred to in subsection (c)(89) is designated as 
Interstate Route I-169.''.
                                 <all>
```