alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     
</LEGEND>
<CIK>      0000316736                    
<NAME>     FIELDPOINT PETROLEUM CORPORATION                   
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         48457
<SECURITIES>                                   2880
<RECEIVABLES>                                  134551
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               187523
<PP&E>                                         802267
<DEPRECIATION>                                 353935
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1009790
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          368311
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       44132
<OTHER-SE>                                     83906
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1009790
<SALES>                                        561875
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               739410
<CGS>                                          177078
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  626200
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               4500
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             33830
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                43767
<INCOME-TAX>                                   19784
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            23983
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   23983
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .01
        


</TABLE>
### §1353b. Extra compensation; payment

The said extra compensation shall be paid by the master, owner, agent, or consignee of such vessel or other conveyance arriving in the United States from a foreign port to the Attorney General, who shall pay the same to the several immigration officers and employees entitled thereto as provided in this section and section 1353a of this title. Such extra compensation shall be paid if such officers or employees have been ordered to report for duty and have so reported, whether the actual inspection or examination of passengers or crew takes place or not: Provided, That this section shall not apply to the inspection at designated ports of entry of passengers arriving by international ferries, bridges, or tunnels, or by aircraft, railroad trains, or vessels on the Great Lakes and connecting waterways, when operating on regular schedules.

(Mar. 2, 1931, ch. 368, §2, 46 Stat. 1467; 1940 Reorg. Plan No. V, eff. June 14, 1940, 5 F.R. 2223, 54 Stat. 1238.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was not enacted as part of the Immigration and Nationality Act which comprises this chapter.

1940 Reorg. Plan No. V is authority for the substitution of "Attorney General" for "Secretary of Labor." See note set out under section 1551 of this title.

Section was formerly classified to section 342d of Title 5 prior to the general revision and enactment of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees, by Pub. L. 89–554, §1, Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 378. Prior thereto, section was classified to section 109b of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Abolition of Immigration and Naturalization Service and Transfer of Functions

For abolition of Immigration and Naturalization Service, transfer of functions, and treatment of related references, see note set out under section 1551 of this title.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

Functions of all other officers of Department of Justice and functions of all agencies and employees of such Department, with a few exceptions, transferred to Attorney General, with power vested in him to authorize their performance or performance of any of his functions by any of such officers, agencies, and employees, by 1950 Reorg. Plan No. 2, §§1, 2, eff. May 24, 1950, 15 F.R. 3173, 64 Stat. 1261, set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees. See sections 509 and 510 of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Hyman Paperman, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered October 19, 1962 upon his plea of guilty, convicting him of criminally buying and receiving stolen property as a misdemeanor, and sentencing him to serve one year in the New York City Penitentiary. Defendant is at liberty on a certificate of reasonable doubt. Judgment modified on the law and on the facts to the extent of suspending the execution of *657the sentence and placing the defendant on probation for a period of three years. As so modified, judgment affirmed. In our opinion, under all the circumstances here, the defendant, who is a first offender, is a proper subject for probation (cf. Penal Law, §§ 1308, 1937; Code Grim. Pro., § 933; *People*v. *Zueherman,*5 N Y 2d 401; *People ex rel. Goldberg*v. *Sheriff of Suffolk County,*206 Mise. 820; *People*v. *Foote,*144 Mise. 134; *People*v. *Silver,*10 A D 2d 274). Hill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur; Beldoek, P. J., and Klein-field, J., dissent and vote to affirm the judgment, with the following memorandum : On August 17, 1961 defendant was indicted for criminally buying and receiving stolen property as a felony, and for criminally concealing and withholding stolen and wrongfully acquired property, also as a felony. The subject matter of the theft was a trailer truck of considerable value. On May 14, 1962 the court exercised its discretion in accepting defendant’s plea of guilty to criminally buying and receiving stolen property as a misdemeanor. On October 19, 1962 defendant was sentenced to one year in the penitentiary. Where (as here) the defendant has been charged with a felony and he has been given consideration by the acceptance of a plea of guilty to a misdemeanor, these facts, together with the facts disclosed by the Probation Department’s presentenee investigation report, demonstrate that in this ease the sentence of one year in the penitentiary was a proper exercise of discretion on the part of the sentencing Judge and that such sentence should not be disturbed by an appellate court.
#### (A) In the Matter of the Accounting of Ethel M. Samuels, as Executrix of Harry H. Samuels, Deceased, Appellant. John Marella, Appellant. (B) In the Matter of the Claim of Betty Raskind, Respondent, v. Speed Printing Company et al., Appellants. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.

[In each action] Motions for permission to appeal to the Court of Appeals and to certify that questions of law are involved which ought to be reviewed by the Court of Appeals, denied, without costs.
### §§331 to 339. Repealed. Pub. L. 93–461, Oct. 20, 1974, 88 Stat. 1387

Section 331, R.S. §2158, prohibited cooly trade.

Section 332, R.S. §2159; Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, §291, 36 Stat. 1167, related to forfeiture of vessels engaged in cooly trade.

Section 333, R.S. §2160, related to penalty for building vessels to engage in cooly trade.

Section 334, R.S. §2161, related to punishment for engaging in cooly trade.

Section 335, R.S. §2162, excepted voluntary emigration of coolies from prohibition.

Section 336, act Mar. 3, 1875, ch. 141, §1, 18 Stat. 477, related to inquiry and certification by consular officers.

Section 337, R.S. §2163, related to examination of vessels.

Section 338, act Mar. 3, 1875, ch. 141, §2, 18 Stat. 477, related to penalties for involuntary transportation of Chinese, Japanese, and others for purpose of holding to service.

Section 339, act Mar. 3, 1875, ch. 141, §4, 18 Stat. 477, related to punishment for contracting to supply cooly labor.
#### Florence Murphy, as Executrix of Mary Murtagh, Deceased, et al., Appellants, et al., Plaintiff, v. City of New York, Respondent, et al., Defendants. (Action No. 1.) Florence Murphy, as Executrix of Mary Murtagh, Deceased, et al., Appellants, v. Anna Sesselmann, Respondent. (Action No. 2.)

In two consolidated negligence actions to recover damages for personal injuries and loss of services, all the plaintiffs (other than Anna Sesselmann) appeal as follows from judgments of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered after a jury trial, dismissing the complaints at the end of their case on the ground that, as a matter of law, they failed to prove a cause of action against any of the defendants: In Action No. 1, all the plaintiffs (other than Anna Sesselmann) appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of the judgment, dated May 27, 1960 and entered June 6, 1960, as dismissed their complaint against the defendant City of New York. In Action No. 2, all the plaintiffs appeal from a separate undated judgment, entered June 28, 1960, dismissing their complaint against Anna Sesselmann as defendant. In Action No. 1: Judgment, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, without costs. In Action No. 2: Judgment reversed on the law, action severed, and new trial granted, with costs to plaintiffs to abide the event. From the proof adduced, it appears that while the defendant city’s police officers were engaged in pursuit of a fleeing automobile, the latter came into collision with defendant Anna Sesselmann’s automobile at a street intersection which was controlled by traffic lights. Her automobile, in which the injured plaintiffs were passengers, had stopped for a red light before entering the intersection; it proceeded into the intersection when the light was green in her favor. There was no contact between the police patrol car and her automobile. In our opinion, the evidence failed to establish actionable negligence on the part of the city (cf. *Scott*v. *City of New York,*2 A D 854, affd. 9 N Y 2d 764; *Williams*v. *State of New York,*308 N. Y. 548). However, upon this record, we believe that a prima facie case was made out against defendant Anna Sesselmann (in Action No. 2). She could not close her eyes to approaching danger simply because the traffic light was in her favor. The fundamental obligation imposed upon her to exercise ordinary and reasonable care continued unabated. It was for the jury to say whether, under all the circumstances, she discharged such obligation; whether she did all that she reasonably could have done to avoid the collision. Issues of fact were thus sufficiently raised as to her negligence; it was error to dismiss the complaint against her as a matter of law at the close of plaintiff’s ease. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Brennan and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
### §8205. Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated such sums as are necessary to carry out this chapter.

(Pub. L. 107–171, title X, §10205, May 13, 2002, 116 Stat. 491.)
U.S, Department

of lronsportotion Federal Aviation Administration

November 19,20]0

Mr. Jeff Cooke Vice President, Maintenance andEngineering Voyageur Airways 1500 Airport Road North Bay, Ontario, PIB 8G2 Canada

Dear Mr. Cooke: Transport Airplane Directorate 1601 Lind Avenue. SOW. Renton, Washington 98057-3356
Editorial Note on Part 842
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 842 appear at 81 FR 83688, Nov. 22, 2016.

§ 842.105 Delegations of authority. ( a ) *Settlement authority.* The following individuals have delegated authority to settle, compromise, or waive MCRP claims for $300,000 or less and to accept full payment on any claim: ( 1 ) The Judge Advocate General.
( 2 ) The Deputy Judge Advocate General.
( 3 ) The Director of Civil Law.
( 4 ) Chief, Claims and Tort Litigation Staff and the Chief, MCRP.
( b ) *Redelegation of authority.* The individuals described in paragraph (a) of this section may re-delegate a portion or all of their authority to subordinates, subject to the following limitations: ( 1 ) SJAs, when given Medical Cost Reimbursement (MCR) claims jurisdiction, are granted authority to waive, compromise, or settle claims in amounts of $25,000 or less. This authority may be re-delegated in writing with authority to re-delegate to subordinates.
( 2 ) SJAs of numbered Air Forces, when given MCR claims jurisdiction, are granted authority to waive, compromise, or settle claims in amounts of $40,000 or less. This authority may be re-delegated in writing with authority to re-delegate to subordinates.
( 3 ) SJAs of single base GCMs, the SJAs of GCMs in PACAF and USAFE, and the SJAs of each Air Force base, station, or fixed installation have delegated authority to compromise or waive claims for $15,000 or less and to accept full payment on any claim.
( c ) *Authority to assert a claim.* Each settlement authority has authority to assert a claim in any amount for the reasonable value of medical care.
( d ) *Authority to reduce, withdraw, and restore settlement authority.* Any superior settlement authority may reduce, withdraw, or restore delegated authority.
( e ) *Settlement negotiations.* A settlement authority may settle a claim filed for an amount within the delegated settlement authority. Claims in excess of the delegated authority must be approved by the next higher settlement authority. Unsuccessful negotiations at one level do not bind higher authority. Note to paragraph ( e
):
Telephonic approvals, in the discretion of the higher settlement authority, are authorized.
( f ) *Special exceptions.* Only the Department of Justice (DOJ) may approve claims involving: ( 1 ) Compromise or waiver of a claim for more than $300,000.
( 2 ) Settlement previously referred to DOJ.
( 3 ) Settlement where a third party files suit against the U.S. or the injured party arising out of the same incident.
[81 FR 83698, Nov. 22, 2016]
### §1764. Reports and dispatches

#### (a) Availability to Department of State and interested Government agencies

The reports and dispatches prepared by the officers appointed or assigned under this subchapter shall be made available to the Department of State, and may be made available to other interested agencies of the Government, and the agricultural reports and dispatches and related information produced by officers of the Foreign Service shall be available to the Secretary of Agriculture.

#### (b) Office space, equipment, and administrative and clerical services

The Secretary of State is authorized upon request of the Secretary of Agriculture to provide office space, equipment, facilities, and such other administrative and clerical services as may be required for the personnel affected by this subchapter. The Secretary of Agriculture is authorized to reimburse or advance funds to the Secretary of State for such services.

#### (c) Agency services, personnel, and facilities

Upon the request of the Secretary of Agriculture, each Federal agency may make its services, personnel, and facilities available to officers and employees appointed and assigned to a post abroad under this subchapter in the performance of the functions of such officers and employees. The Secretary of Agriculture may reimburse or advance funds to any such agency for services, personnel, and facilities so made available.

(Aug. 28, 1954, ch. 1041, title VI, §604, 68 Stat. 909; Pub. L. 95–501, title III, §301(4), (6), Oct. 21, 1978, 92 Stat. 1688.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1978—Subsecs. (a), (b). Pub. L. 95–501, §301(4), substituted "this subchapter" for "this chapter".

Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 95–501, §301(6), added subsec. (c).
### §3129a. Exemption from chapter 10 of title 5 for competitive research, extension, and education programs

Chapter 10 of title 5 and title XVIII of this Act [7 U.S.C. 2281 et seq.] shall not apply to any committee, board, commission, panel, or task force, or similar entity, created solely for the purpose of reviewing applications or proposals requesting funding under any competitive research, extension, or education program carried out by the Secretary.

(Pub. L. 95–113, title XIV, §1413B, as added Pub. L. 104–127, title VIII, §804, Apr. 4, 1996, 110 Stat. 1160; amended Pub. L. 117–286, §4(a)(34), Dec. 27, 2022, 136 Stat. 4309.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Title XVIII of this Act, referred to in text, is title XVIII of the Food and Agriculture Act of 1977, Pub. L. 95–113, Sept. 29, 1977, 91 Stat. 1041, which is classified generally to chapter 55A (§2281 et seq.) of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title of 1977 Amendment note set out under section 1281 of this title and Tables.

#### Amendments

Pub. L. 117–286 substituted "Exemption from chapter 10 of title 5" for "Federal Advisory Committee Act exemption" in section catchline and "Chapter 10 of title 5" for "The Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App.)" in text.
§ 1901.01 Authority and purpose. ( a ) *Authority.* This part is issued under the authority of and in order to implement the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a); sec. 102 of the National Security Act of 1947, as amended (50 U.S.C. 403); and sec. 6 of the Central Intelligence Agency Act of 1949, as amended (50 U.S.C. 403g).
( b ) *Purpose in general.* This part prescribes procedures for a requester, as defined herein: ( 1 ) To request notification of whether the Central Intelligence Agency maintains a record concerning them in any non-exempt portion of a system of records or any non-exempt system of records;
( 2 ) To request a copy of all non-exempt records or portions of records;
( 3 ) To request that any such record be amended or augmented; and
( 4 ) To file an administrative appeal to any initial adverse determination to deny access to or amend a record.
( c ) *Other purposes.* This part also sets forth detailed limitations on how and to whom the Agency may disclose personal information and gives notice that certain actions by officers or employees of the United States Government or members of the public could constitute criminal offenses.
### §950bb–2. Innovative Broadband Advancement Program

#### (a) In general

The Secretary shall establish a program to be known as the "Innovative Broadband Advancement Program", under which the Secretary may provide a grant, a loan, or both to an eligible entity for the purpose of demonstrating innovative broadband technologies or methods of broadband deployment that significantly decrease the cost of broadband deployment, and provide substantially faster broadband speeds than are available, in a rural area.

#### (b) Rural area

In this section, the term "rural area" has the meaning provided in section 950bb(b)(3) of this title.

#### (c) Eligibility

To be eligible to obtain assistance under this section for a project, an entity shall—

(1) submit to the Secretary an application—

(A) that describes a project designed to decrease the cost of broadband deployment, and substantially increase broadband speed to not less than the maximum 1 broadband buildout requirements established under section 950bb(e)(4) of this title, in a rural area to be served by the project; and

(B) at such time, in such manner, and containing such other information as the Secretary may require;

(2) demonstrate that the entity is able to carry out the project; and

(3) agree to complete the project build-out within 5 years after the date the assistance is first provided for the project.

#### (d) Prioritization

In awarding assistance under this section, the Secretary shall give priority to proposals for projects that—

(1) involve partnerships between or among multiple entities;

(2) would provide broadband service to the greatest number of rural entities at or above the broadband requirements referred to in subsection (c)(1)(A); and

(3) the Secretary determines could be replicated in rural areas described in paragraph (2).

#### (e) Authorization of appropriations

There is authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section $10,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2019 through 2023.

(May 20, 1936, ch. 432, title VI, §603, as added Pub. L. 113–79, title VI, §6105, Feb. 7, 2014, 128 Stat. 856; amended Pub. L. 115–334, title VI, §6203, Dec. 20, 2018, 132 Stat. 4736.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–334, §6203(1), substituted "Innovative Broadband Advancement" for "Rural Gigabit Network Pilot" in section catchline.

Subsecs. (a) to (d). Pub. L. 115–334, §6203(4), added subsecs. (a) to (d) and struck out former subsecs. (a) to (c) which defined "ultra-high speed service", established the Rural Gigabit Network Pilot Program, and set out eligibility requirements for participation in Program, respectively. Former subsec. (d) redesignated (e).

Subsec. (e). Pub. L. 115–334, §6203(2), (3), redesignated subsec. (d) as (e) and substituted "2019 through 2023" for "2014 through 2018".

1 So in original. Probably should be "minimum".
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 831 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

120 West Pike Street in Canonsburg, Pennsylvania, as the ‘‘Police Officer Scott Bashioum Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 5 (legislative day, APRIL 4), 2017 

Mr. TOOMEY (for himself and Mr. CASEY) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 120 West Pike Street in Canonsburg, Pennsylvania, as the ‘‘Police Officer Scott Bashioum Post Office 

Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. POLICE OFFICER SCOTT BASHIOUM POST OF4 FICE BUILDING. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

6 Postal Service located at 120 West Pike Street in 

7 Canonsburg, Pennsylvania, shall be known and designated 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 831 IS

1 as the ‘‘Police Officer Scott Bashioum Post Office Build2 ing’’. 

3 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg4 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

5 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

6 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Police Officer Scott 

7 Bashioum Post Office Building’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
### §597. Rules and regulations; cooperation with other agencies; compensation of officers and employees; effect on other laws

The Secretary may make such rules, regulations, and orders, and require such reports, as may be necessary to carry out the provisions of this chapter, and may cooperate with any department or agency of the Government, any State, Territory, District, or possession, or department, agency, or political subdivision thereof, or any person, whether operating in one or more jurisdictions; and shall have the power to appoint, remove, and fix the compensation of such officers and employees not in conflict with existing law, and make such expenditures for rent outside the District of Columbia, printing, binding, telegrams, telephones, law books, books of reference, publications, furniture, stationery, office equipment, travel, and other supplies and expenses including reporting services, as shall be necessary to the administration of this chapter in the District of Columbia and elsewhere, and as may be appropriated for by Congress. This chapter shall not abrogate nor nullify any other statute, whether State or Federal, dealing with the same subjects as this chapter; but it is intended that all such statutes shall remain in full force and effect except insofar as they are inconsistent herewith or repugnant hereto.

(Pub. L. 86–687, §7, Sept. 2, 1960, 74 Stat. 735.)