alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 9 (Thursday, January 14, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 3162]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-00577]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; A Solicitation of the National 
Institutes of Health (NIH) and the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention (CDC) for Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) 
Contract Proposals (N01), Topic 100.
    Date: February 2, 2021.
    Time: 11:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate contract proposals.
    Place: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, 
National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3G62A, 
Rockville, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Lynn Rust, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, 
Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural Activities, 
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National 
Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3G62A, Rockville, MD 
20852, (240) 669-5069, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#056977707671456b6c646c612b6b6c6d2b626a73"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="ddb1afa8aea99db3b4bcb4b9f3b3b4b5f3bab2ab">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 8, 2021.
Tyeshia M. Roberson,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2021-00577 Filed 1-13-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EX-10.16



 



 




Exhibit 10.16




AMENDMENT NO. 1

TO

CHART INDUSTRIES, INC.

2005 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN



This AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO CHART INDUSTRIES, INC. 2005 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN (“Amendment”) is made and
executed by Chart Industries, Inc. (the “Company”), as of
the 23rd day of March, 2006.




RECITALS:




          WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board of Directors”) approved and adopted
the Chart Industries, Inc. 2005 Stock Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) on November 23, 2005;




          WHEREAS, Section 3 of the Plan provides that the total number of shares of common stock of the
Company (the “Shares”) which may be issued under the Plan is 225,157;




          WHEREAS, Section 15 of the Plan provides that the Board of Directors may, with the approval of
the shareholders of the Company, amend the Plan to increase the total number of Shares reserved for
the purposes of the Plan; and




          WHEREAS, the Board and FR X Chart Holdings LLC, the sole stockholder of the Company, have
authorized and approved the amendment of the Plan as hereinbefore described.




          NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan shall hereby be amended, as follows:




          1. Section 3 of the Plan shall be deleted in its entirety, and the following shall be
substituted therefor:




          “3. Shares Subject to the Plan




          The total number of Shares which may be issued under the Plan is 245,157, which total is
reserved for issuance to employees of the Company or its Affiliates. The Shares may consist, in
whole or in part, of unissued Shares or treasury Shares. The issuance of Shares or the payment of
cash upon the exercise of an Award or in consideration of the cancellation or termination of an
Award shall reduce the total number of Shares available under the Plan, as applicable. Shares
which are subject to Awards or portions of Awards which terminate or lapse without issuance of
Shares may be granted again under the Plan.”




          2. No other term or provision of the Plan is amended hereby and all such other terms and
provisions of the Plan remain in full force and effect.











 



 




     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Chart Industries, Inc., by its duly authorized officer, has caused this
Amendment No. 1 to Chart Industries, Inc. 2005 Stock Incentive Plan to be executed as of the day
and year first written above.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	CHART INDUSTRIES, INC.	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	By:	 	/s/ Michael F. Biehl	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 

	 	 
	 

	 	Its:	 	Chief Financial Officer
and
Treasurer	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 





-2-
#### § 855.9 Permit renewal.

When a landing permit expires, DD Forms 2401 and 2400 must be resubmitted for continued use of Air Force airfields.

Note:

Corporations must resubmit the DD Form 2402 every five years.
MEMORANDUM

TO: Assistant Inspector General for Audit

Assistant Inspector General for Evaluation, Inspection

and Management Services

Assistant Inspector General for Investigation

Assistant Inspector General for Information Technology Audit

and Computer Crime Investigations

Counsel to the Inspector General

FROM: Inspector General

SUBJECT: Delegation of Authority to Sign and Issue Inspector General's Subpoenas

I. DELEGATION

Under the authority vested in me by Section 3(a) of the Inspector General Act of 

1978, as amended (the Act), 5 U.S.C. Appendix 3, I hereby delegate to you, your 

successor in function, and anyone serving for you in an acting capacity, the 

authority under Section 6(a)(4) of the Act to issue Inspector General's subpoenas

in furtherance of the duties and functions of the Office of Inspector General 

(OIG).

Unless otherwise noted in future delegations of authority, amendments to the 

authorities delegated herein are included within the scope of this delegation.

II. RESERVATIONS

None.

III. REDELEGATION

You may redelegate this authority to OIG supervisors. No further redelegation is 

authorized.
Page 2 – Delegation of Authority

IV. CERTIFICATION AND EFFECTIVE DATE

This delegation is effective upon certification by the Department's Principal 

Delegation Control Officer, and supersedes delegations EF/EFI/112, EF/EFA/126 

and EF/EFA/127. I hereby ratify actions within the scope of this delegation taken 

by you prior to certification of this delegation.

_________/s/_____________ 

 John P. Higgins, Jr.

OGC Clearance and Date: /s/ David Berthiaume, 7/13/2004

Certified Date: 7/23/2004

Departmental Delegations Control Officer: /s/ Naty G. Beetle

Control Number: EF/EFT/149
**MEMORANDUM**

DATE: July

7, 2014 TO: Carbon Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR

–2013
- 0602 FROM: EPA Region 1 SUBJECT: June 26, 2014 , Meeting with Massachusetts State Staff Regarding Proposed

Carbon Power Plan for Existing Power Plants
**SUMMARY** A meeting was held between EPA and the attendees listed below on June 26, 2014 to discuss the proposed Carbon Power Plan for Existing Power Plants

. Discussion covered Massachusetts’ state goal calculations , focusing on renewable energy and energy

efficiency

. **ATTENDEES (all by phone)**  Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection: Nancy Seidman Will Space Seth Federspiel Bill Lamkin Marily n Levenson Massachusetts Department of Energy Resources: Alissa Whiteman Bram Claey s Tina Halfpenny Massachusetts Department of Public Utilities: Justin Brant EPA: Joe Bry son Jenny Noonan Brian Fisher Denise Mulholland Michael Cohen Cy nthia Greene Shutsu Wong Dave Conro y Bob McConnell
#### State of Connecticut *v.*Henry A. McClain

*Henry A. McClain,*pro se, in support of the motion.

Submitted November 18

decided November 26, 1974

The defendant’s “Motion to Suspend Rules and Expedite Appeal” from the Superior Court in New London County is denied.
# A

Adult_Education_State_Grants

Byrd_Honors_Scholarships

Chapter_1_Handicapped_Program

Chapter_2_State_and_Local_Programs

Christa_McAuliffe_Fellowships

Consumer_and_Homemaking_Education

Douglas_Teacher_Scholarships

Education_for_Homeless_Children_and_Youth

Eisenhower_Mathematics_and_Science_Education_State_Grants

ESEA_Title_I__Capital_Expenses_for_Private_School_Children

ESEA_Title_I__Even_Start

ESEA_Title_I__Grants_to_Local_Educational_Agencies

ESEA_Title_I__Migrant

ESEA_Title_I__Neglected_and_Delinquent

ESEA_Title_I__State_Administration

ESEA_Title_I__State_School_Improvement_Grants

Federal_Pell_Grants

Federal_Perkins_Loans__Capital_Contributions

Federal_Supplemental_Educational_Opportunity_Grants

Federal_Work_Study

Foreign_Language_Assistance

Grand_Total

Immigrant_Education

Impact_Aid__Basic_Support_Payments

Independent_Living_State_Grants

Indian_Education__Grants_to_Local_Educational_Agencies

Leveraging_Educational_Assistance_Partnership

Safe_and_Drug_Free_Schools_State_Grants

Special_Education__Grants_for_Infants_and_Families

Special_Education__Grants_to_States

Special_Education__Preschool_Grants

State_Literacy_Resource_Centers

State_Postsecondary_Review_Progam

Supported_Employment_State_Grants

Vocational_Education__Tech_Prep_Education

Vocational_Education_Community_Based_Organizations

Vocational_Education_State_Councils

Vocational_Education_State_Grants

Vocational_Rehabilitation_State_Grants

Vocational_Education_Supplementary_Grants
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v George Raimondi, Also Known as George Lynch, Appellant.

Judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County, rendered July 1, 1975, affirmed (see *People v Iannone,*45 NY2d 589). Latham, J. P., Suozzi, Gulotta, Shapiro and Cohalan, JJ., concur.
No. 762.

#### Central Elevator Company of Baltimore City *v.*Edwin Dyason, Master of the Steamship “Welbeck Hall,” etc.

March 29, 1920.

*Mr. Frederic D. McKenney*and *Mr. Shirley Carter*for petitioner.

*Mr. James K. Symmers*for respondent.

Petition for a writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
#### § 22.300 Purpose.

This subpart establishes DoD policy and implements statutes related to the use of competitive procedures in the award of grants and cooperative agreements.
1219.502-9 Withdrawing or modifying small business set-asides. ( a ) If the contracting officer makes a determination before contract award that a set-aside is disadvantageous to the public interest, withdrawal of an individual small business set-aside shall be initiated by giving written notice to the small business specialist, the SBA procurement center representative and the OSDBU stating the reasons for withdrawal.
( b ) If the agency small business specialist does not agree to a withdrawal or modification, the case shall be referred to the COCO for review prior to consulting with the assigned SBA representative. The contracting officer shall follow the documentation requirements of FAR 19.506(c).
#### UNITED STATES of America ex rel. Ernest CUNNINGHAM v. A. T. RUNDLE, Superintendent.

Civ. A. No. 70-1585.

United States District Court, E. D. Pennsylvania.

June 24, 1970.

*1199OPINION

LUONGO, District Judge.

Ernest Cunningham, a state prisoner, was convicted on charges of larceny and aggravated robbery (Bill Nos. 1287, 1289, April Sessions 1963, Court of Quarter Sessions, Philadelphia). No appeal was taken from that conviction. In 1967 Cunningham filed a petition under the Pennsylvania Post Conviction Hearing Act, 19 P.S. § 1180-1, et seq., alleging that he was denied the right to appeal his convictions because he was not advised of his right to appeal. The state court appointed counsel to represent Cunningham in the PCHA proceedings. On February 14, 1968, the Honorable Bernard J. Kelley granted him leave to file post trial motions *nunc pro tunc.*

On August 27, 1968, the Honorable Joseph Gold ordered a new trial on the larceny bill, No. 1287, and denied the motions on the aggravated robbery bill, No. 1289. There was no appeal taken from Judge Gold’s order denying the motions for new trial on Bill No. 1289.1

In the habeas corpus petition filed in this court, Cunningham asserts that because of court appointed counsel’s failure to communicate with him, he is under the impression that Judge Gold has not as yet handed down a final and appealable order, and he requests that this court take jurisdiction because of the “inordinate delay” in disposing of his petition in the state courts.

It is clear that whatever injury relator has suffered in this matter is the result of the alleged ineffective assistance of counsel, and not the result of any attempt by the state courts or other state officials to delay his application.

Relator has never properly presented to the state court for its consideration the claim that court appointed counsel failed to discharge his duty to prosecute the PCHA petition to conclusion. There are adequate available state remedies for obtaining an order permitting an appeal *nunc pro tunc*from the adverse PCHA ruling if relator can demonstrate to the state court that the failure to appeal was due to the fault of counsel. See Commonwealth v. Haywood, 436 Pa. 522, 261 A.2d 78 (1970), citing Commonwealth v. Baker, 429 Pa. 209, 239 A.2d 201 (1969).

This petition will, therefore, be dismissed, without prejudice, for failure to exhaust available state remedies.

ORDER

It is ordered that the Petition of Ernest Cunningham for Writ of Habeas Corpus is dismissed, without prejudice, for failure to exhaust state remedies.

There is no probable cause for appeal from this Older.

1

. Upon motion of the Commonwealth, Bill No. 1287 was nol prossed on March 20,1970.
#### 1.105-3 Copies.

Copies of the FAR in CFR form may be purchased from the Bookstore of the Government Publishing Office (GPO), Washington, DC 20402.

[84 FR 19839, May 6, 2019]
### §7000. Implementation of final determinations of Division

#### (a) In general

On the return of a case to an agency pursuant to the final determination of the Division, the head of the agency shall implement the final determination not later than 30 days after the effective date of the notice of the final determination.

#### (b) Reports

#### (1) In general

Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this subsection, and every 180 days thereafter, the head of each agency shall submit to the Committee on Agriculture of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry of the Senate, and publish on the website of the Department, a report that includes—

(A) a description of all cases returned to the agency during the period covered by the report pursuant to a final determination of the Division;

(B) the status of implementation of each final determination; and

(C) if the final determination has not been implemented—

(i) the reason that the final determination has not been implemented; and

(ii) the projected date of implementation of the final determination.

#### (2) Updates

Each month, the head of each agency shall publish on the website of the Department any updates to the reports submitted under paragraph (1).

(Pub. L. 103–354, title II, §280, Oct. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 3233; Pub. L. 110–234, title XIV, §14009, May 22, 2008, 122 Stat. 1446; Pub. L. 110–246, §4(a), title XIV, §14009, June 18, 2008, 122 Stat. 1664, 2208.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The date of the enactment of this subsection, referred to in subsec. (b)(1), is the date of enactment of Pub. L. 110–246, which was approved June 18, 2008.

#### Codification

Pub. L. 110–234 and Pub. L. 110–246 made identical amendments to this section. The amendments by Pub. L. 110–234 were repealed by section 4(a) of Pub. L. 110–246.

#### Amendments

2008—Pub. L. 110–246, §14009, designated existing provisions as subsec. (a), inserted heading, and added subsec. (b).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2008 Amendment

Amendment of this section and repeal of Pub. L. 110–234 by Pub. L. 110–246 effective May 22, 2008, the date of enactment of Pub. L. 110–234, see section 4 of Pub. L. 110–246, set out as an Effective Date note under section 8701 of this title.
§ 536.70 Preparation and forwarding of payment vouchers. ( a ) An unrepresented claimant will be listed as the sole payee. Joint claimants will not be listed since settlement agreements must specify the amount payable to each claimant individually and each must be issued a separate check.
( b ) When a claimant is represented by an attorney, only one payment voucher will be issued with the claimant and the attorney as joint payees. The payment will be sent to the office of the claimant's attorney. The attorney of record, either an individual or firm designated by the claimant, will be the co-payee. If claimant has been represented by other attorneys in the same claim, such attorneys will not be listed as payees, even if they have a lien. Satisfaction of any such fee will be a matter between the claimant and such attorney. If payment is made by electronic transfer, the funds will be paid into the account of the claimant. However, if requested, the payment may be made into the attorney's escrow account provided the claimant has provided written authorization.
( c ) In a structured settlement the structured settlement broker will be the sole payee, who is authorized to issue checks for the amounts set forth in the settlement agreement. The up-front cash payment may be deposited into an escrow account established for the benefit of the claimant.
( d ) If a claimant is a minor or has been declared incompetent by a court or other authority authorized to do so, payment will be made to the court-appointed guardian of the minor or incompetent, at a financial institution approved by the court approving the settlement.
( e ) If the claimant is representing a deceased's estate on a wrongful death claim, or a survival action on behalf of the deceased, the payment will be made to the court-appointed representative of the estate. No payment will be made directly to the estate.
Note to § 536.70 :
See also § 536.63 and DA Pam 27-162, paragraphs 2-73 and 2-81.
§ 935.3 Definitions. In this part— ( a ) *General Counsel* means the General Counsel of the Air Force or his successor in office.
( b ) *Commander* means the Commander, Wake Island.
( c ) *Commander, Wake Island* means the Commander of Pacific Air Forces or such subordinate commissioned officer of the Air Force to whom he may delegate his authority under this part.
( d ) He or his includes both the masculine and feminine genders, unless the context implies otherwise.
( e ) *Judge* includes Judges of the Wake Island Court and Court of Appeals.
1401.7001-3 Administrative review and approval by bureaus and offices. ( a ) Administrative review and approval requirements for contract actions shall be established by the HCA and issued as internal bureau procedures. At a minimum, the review and approval requirements must address a representative percentage of the overall contract actions within a bureau/office. The procedures shall include: ( 1 ) Identifying the type and dollar amounts of the actions to be reviewed based on the volume and nature of the contracting office workload;
( 2 ) Designating the stage(s) in the acquisition process when the review(s) shall be performed;
( 3 ) Establishing review and approval levels based on the type and dollar amount of the action and the capabilities of the reviewing office;
( 4 ) Specifying what information is required to review the action, which includes creating a review and approval form and mechanism for following up on the correction of deficiencies noted in the review; and
( 5 ) Providing for periodic review of procedures and revision as required, to assure necessary controls are maintained.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                      0000032621
<NAME>                             EMERSON RADIO CORP.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-2001
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                                                   7132
<SECURITIES>                                                               17
<RECEIVABLES>                                                            5134
<ALLOWANCES>                                                             4021
<INVENTORY>                                                             15412
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                        29515
<PP&E>                                                                    988
<DEPRECIATION>                                                           3515
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                          53545
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                   23197
<BONDS>                                                                 20750
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                       0
<PREFERRED>                                                              3310
<COMMON>                                                                  513
<OTHER-SE>                                                               5676
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                            53545
<SALES>                                                                 80594
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                        81827
<CGS>                                                                   71410
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                           71410
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                         6293
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                          126
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                        518
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                          3323
<INCOME-TAX>                                                              278
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                      3045
<DISCONTINUED>                                                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                             0
<CHANGES>                                                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                                             3045
<EPS-BASIC>                                                               .07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                             .06


</TABLE>
#### 1326.203 Transition of work.

The designee authorized to determine that transitioning response, relief, and/or reconstruction activity to a local firm, or firms, is not feasible or practicable as set forth in CAM 1301.70.