alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

ATTORNEY APPEARANCE FORM

NOTE: In order to appear before this Court an attorney must either be a member in good

standing of this Court¶s general bar or be granted leave to appear pro hac vice as provided for

by Local Rules 83.12 through 83.14.

In the Matter of Case Number:

AN APPEARANCE IS HEREBY FILED BY THE UNDERSIGNED AS ATTORNEY FOR:

NAME (Type or print)

SIGNATURE (Use electronic signature if the appearance form is filed electronically)

 s/

FIRM

STREET ADDRESS

CITY/STATE/ZIP

ID NUMBER (SEE ITEM 3 IN INSTRUCTIONS) TELEPHONE NUMBER

ARE YOU ACTING AS LEAD COUNSEL IN THIS CASE? YES NO 

ARE YOU ACTING AS LOCAL COUNSEL IN THIS CASE? YES NO 

ARE YOU A MEMBER OF THIS COURT¶S TRIAL BAR? YES NO 

IF THIS CASE REACHES TRIAL, WILL YOU ACT AS THE TRIAL ATTORNEY? YES NO 

IF THIS IS A CRIMINAL CASE, CHECK THE BOX BELOW THAT DESCRIBES YOUR STATUS.

RETAINED COUNSEL APPOINTED COUNSEL 

In re Innovatio IP Ventures, LLC, Patent Litigation

1:11-cv-09308

Lowe’s Home Centers, Inc.

Adam R. Alper

Adam R. Alper

Kirkland & Ellis LLP

555 California Street

San Francisco, CA 94104

415.439.1400

✔

✔

✔

✔

Case: 1:11-cv-09308 Document #: 465 Filed: 10/29/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:16726
#### 1511.011-73 Level of effort.

The Contracting Officer shall insert the clause at 1552.211-73, *Level of Effort—Cost Reimbursement Contract,* in cost-reimbursement contracts including cost contracts without fee, cost-sharing contracts, cost-plus-fixed-fee (CPFF) contracts, cost-plus-incentive-fee contracts (CPIF), and cost-plus-award-fee contracts (CPAF).

[81 FR 31866, May 20, 2016]
#### 1252.239-85 Personnel Screening—Background Investigations.

As prescribed in 1239.7204(j), insert the clause as follows:

# Personnel Screening—Background Investigations (NOV 2022)

(a) Contractors shall provide support personnel who are U.S. persons maintaining a NACI clearance or greater in accordance with OMB memorandum M-05-24, Section C (*see https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/legacy_drupal_files/omb/memoranda/2005/m05-24.pdf*).

(b) The Contractor shall furnish documentation reflecting favorable adjudication of background investigations for all personnel supporting the system. The Contractor shall also comply with Executive Order 12968, Access to Classified Information. DOT separates the risk levels for personnel working on Federal computer systems into three categories: low risk, moderate risk, and high risk. The Contractor is responsible for the cost of meeting all security requirements and maintaining assessment and authorization.

(c) The Contractor's employees with access to DOT systems containing sensitive information may be required to obtain security clearances (*i.e.,* Confidential, Secret, or Top Secret). National Security work designated “special sensitive,” “critical sensitive,” or “non-critical sensitive,” will determine the level of clearance required for contractor employees. Personnel security clearances for national security contracts in DOT will be processed according to the Department of Defense National Industrial Security Program Operating Manual (NISPOM).

(d) The Contracting Officer, through the Contracting Officer's Representative (COR) or Program Manager will ensure that all required information is forwarded to the Federal Protective Service (FPS) in accordance with the DOT Policy. FPS will then contact each Applicant with instructions for completing required forms and releases for the type of personnel investigation requested.

(e) Applicants will not be reinvestigated if a prior favorable adjudication is on file with FPS, OPM or DoD, there has been no break in service, and the position is identified at the same or lower risk level. Once a favorable FBI Criminal History Check (Fingerprint Check) has been returned, Applicants may receive a DOT identity credential (if required) and initial access to information systems holding DOT information.

(End of clause)
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

The OSEP *Annual Report to Congress on the Implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act* (IDEA), as reauthorized in 2004, requires that the Department of Education report annually on the progress made toward the provision of a free appropriate public education to all children with disabilities and the provision of early intervention services to infants and toddlers with disabilities. 

More recent *Annual Reports* can be read directly on OSEP's IDEA Website:

**Recent *Annual Reports to Congress***

A full range of *Annual Reports* (1995 to present) can also be found on the ERIC Website:

***Annual Reports to Congress*** (1995 to present)

----

 

 Printable view

## How Do I Find...

          - Student loans, forgiveness
          - Higher Education Rulemaking
          - College accreditation
          - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
          - FERPA
          - FAFSA
          - 1098, tax forms

More >

## Information About...

          - Elevating Teaching
          - Early Learning
          - Engage Every Student
          - Unlocking Career Success
          - Cybersecurity

 

----

*Our mission*

Student Loans
Repaying LoansDefaulted LoansLoan ForgivenessLoan Servicers

Grants & Programs
Apply for Pell GrantsGrants ForecastApply for a Grant

Laws & Guidance
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)FERPACivil RightsNew IDEA Website

Data & Research
Education StatisticsPostsecondary Education DataED Data ExpressNation's Report CardWhat Works ClearinghouseOpen Data PlatformCOVID Relief Data

About Us
Contact UsED OfficesJobsPress ReleasesFAQsRecursos en españolBudget, PerformancePrivacy Program

----

          - Notices
          - FOIA
          - Privacy Policy
          - Accessibility
          - Security
          - Information quality
          - Inspector General
          - Whitehouse.gov
          - USA.gov
          - Benefits.gov
          - Regulations.gov
          - vote.gov
### §§343a to 343c–1. Repealed. June 26, 1953, ch. 157, §2, 67 Stat. 85, 86

Section 343a, acts May 22, 1928, ch. 687, §1, 45 Stat. 711; Mar. 10, 1930, ch. 73, 46 Stat. 83, authorized additional annual appropriations of $980,000, and $500,000, further to develop cooperative agricultural extension work under sections 341 to 343, 344 to 346, and 347a to 349 of this title, provided for the disposition of such sums, and extended the system to Hawaii.

Section 343b, act May 22, 1928, ch. 687, §2, 45 Stat. 712, provided that the sums appropriated under said section 343a should be in addition to sums appropriated under section 343 of this title, or sums otherwise annually appropriated for cooperative agricultural extension work.

Section 343c, acts June 29, 1935, ch. 338, title II, §21, 49 Stat. 438; June 6, 1945, ch. 175, §2, 59 Stat. 233, authorized further additional appropriations on an ascending scale until they amounted to $12,000,000 annually, further to develop the cooperative agricultural system inaugurated under sections 341 to 343, 344 to 346, 347a to 349 of this title, and provided for their disposition.

Section 343c–1, acts Apr. 24, 1939, ch. 85, 53 Stat. 589; Sept. 21, 1944, ch. 412, title VII, §707, 58 Stat. 742, authorized additional appropriations of $555,000 annually, for the purpose of paying the expenses of cooperative extension work in agriculture and home economics, and provided for their disposition.

The provisions that were contained in all of the above repealed sections are covered generally by sections 341 to 343, 344 to 346, and 347a to 349 of this title.
Case: 1:12-cv-00894 Document #: 8 Filed: 04/05/12 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:18
Case: 1:12-cv-00894 Document #: 8 Filed: 04/05/12 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:19
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">Dynasty Medical Care, P.C., as Assignee of Jose Rodriguez, Respondent, <br><br>against<br><br>21st Century Security Insurance Company, Appellant.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Law Office of Bryan M. Rothenberg (Jennifer A. Joseph of counsel), for appellant.Baker Sanders, LLC (Malgorzata Rafalko of counsel), for respondent (no brief filed).</p><p>Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Richmond County (Orlando Marrazzo, Jr., J.), entered October 15, 2015. The order denied defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.</p><p>ORDERED that the order is reversed, with $30 costs, and defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is granted.</p><p>In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, defendant appeals from an order of the Civil Court which denied defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.</p><p>Contrary to plaintiff's contentions, defendant established that it had first learned of the accident on the date it had received an NF-2 form, which form had been submitted more than 30 days after the accident had occurred, and that it had timely mailed (<a href="../2008/2008_04072.htm" target="_blank"><i>see St. Vincent's Hosp. of Richmond v Government Empls. Ins. Co.</i>, 50 AD3d 1123</a> [2008]) its denial of claim forms, which denied plaintiff's claims on the ground that written notice of the accident had not been submitted to defendant within 30 days of its occurrence (<i>see</i> 11 NYCRR 65-1.1 [d]). The denial of claim forms further advised plaintiff that late notice would be excused if reasonable justification for the failure to give timely notice was provided (<i>see</i> 11 NYCRR 65-3.3 [e]). As defendant established its prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law (<a href="../2016/2016_51358.htm" target="_blank"><i>see TAM Med. Supply Corp. v <font color="FF0000">[*2]</font>Fiduciary Ins. Co. of Am.</i>, 53 Misc 3d 129</a>[A], 2016 NY Slip Op 51352[U] [App Term, 2d Dept, 2d, 11th &amp; 13th Jud Dists 2016]; <a href="../2012/2012_52176.htm" target="_blank"><i>Ukon Med. Care, P.C. v Clarendon Natl. Ins. Co.</i>, 37 Misc 3d 136</a>[A], 2012 NY Slip Op 52176[U] [App Term, 2d Dept, 2d, 11th &amp; 13th Jud Dists 2012]), the burden shifted to plaintiff to demonstrate a triable issue of fact. The affirmation of plaintiff's counsel submitted in opposition to defendant's motion failed to demonstrate the existence of a triable issue of fact. Plaintiff's remaining contentions lack merit. </p><p>Accordingly, the order is reversed and defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is granted.</p><p>PESCE, P.J., ALIOTTA and ELLIOT, JJ., concur.</p><br>ENTER:<br>Paul Kenny<br>Chief Clerk<br>Decision Date: November 02, 2018<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_2_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
#### 1501.603 Selection, appointment, and termination of appointment.
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------

                              FAB INDUSTRIES, INC.


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Fab Industries, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending August 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Samson Bitensky,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


/s/ Samson Bitensky
---------------------------
Samson Bitensky
Chief Executive Officer
Ocotber 14, 2003
#### § 767.22 Final administrative decision.

If no request for a hearing is timely filed as provided in § 767.20(f), the NOVA becomes effective as the final administrative decision and order of the Agency on the 45th day after service of the NOVA or on the last day of any delay period granted.
Fiscal Year 2017 Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies - DELAWARE

FY 2017 Title I

LEA ID District Allocation*

1000080 Appoquinimink School District 1,103,226

1001240 Brandywine School District 3,892,245

1000180 Caesar Rodney School District 2,453,202

1000170 Cape Henlopen School District 1,443,433

1000190 Capital School District 4,123,712

1000200 Christina School District 10,570,641

1000230 Colonial School District 5,743,623

1000270 Delmar School District 339,249

1000680 Indian River School District 3,750,808

1000790 Lake Forest School District 1,499,595

1000810 Laurel School District 1,060,210

1001080 Milford School District 1,844,755

1001300 Red Clay Consolidated School District 8,144,150

1001530 Seaford School District 2,534,890

1001620 Smyrna School District 1,076,821

1001850 Woodbridge School District 1,306,351

1099999 PART D SUBPART 2 0

* Actual amounts received by LEAs will be smaller than shown here due to State-level adjustments to Federal Title I allocations. States adjust

 allocations, for example, to reflect LEA boundary changes or the creation of new LEAs, including charter school LEAs, that are not accounted

 for in the statutory calculations. States also are permitted to reserve, for administration, up to 1 percent of the allocations they would receive

 if $14 billion were appropriated and generally must reserve 7 percent of their allocations for school improvement. These 

 adjustments will reduce the actual amounts available.
| 1)     |   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and                            |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                 |
| 2)     |   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

| /s/ Greggory Schneider                  |   |   |   |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| Greggory Schneider                                                                                                           |   |   |   |
| Chief Financial and Principal Financial Officer                                                                              |
### §211. Order of Secretary as to charges or practices; prescribing rates and practices generally

Whenever after full hearing upon a complaint made as provided in section 210 of this title, or after full hearing under an order for investigation and hearing made by the Secretary on his own initiative, either in extension of any pending complaint or without any complaint whatever, the Secretary is of the opinion that any rate, charge, regulation, or practice of a stockyard owner or market agency, for or in connection with the furnishing of stockyard services, is or will be violative of section 205, 206, or 208 of this title, the Secretary—

(a) May in accordance with the standard set forth in section 206 of this title determine and prescribe what will be the rate or charge, or rates or charges, to be thereafter in such case observed as the maximum or minimum or both to be charged, and what regulation or practice is or will be just, reasonable, and nondiscriminatory to be thereafter followed: Provided, That the Secretary shall prescribe the rate or charge, or rates or charges, on a percentage or per head basis at the election of the stockyard owner or market agency, or on any other basis elected by the stockyard owner or market agency unless the Secretary finds such other basis to be violative of section 206 of this title; and

(b) May make an order that such owner or operator (1) shall cease and desist from such violation to the extent to which the Secretary finds that it does or will exist; (2) shall not thereafter publish, demand, or collect any rate or charge for the furnishing of stockyard services other than the rate or charge or rates or charges so prescribed; and (3) shall conform to and observe the regulation or practice so prescribed.

(Aug. 15, 1921, ch. 64, title III, §310, 42 Stat. 166; Aug. 10, 1939, ch. 663, 53 Stat. 1351; Pub. L. 95–409, §1(b), Oct. 2, 1978, 92 Stat. 886.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1978—Pub. L. 95–409, §1(b)(1), in provision preceding subsec. (a), substituted "violative of section 205, 206 or 208 of this title" for "unjust, unreasonable, or discriminatory".

Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 95–409, §1(b)(2), substituted "May in accordance with the standard set forth in section 206 of this title determine and prescribe what will be the rate" for "May determine and prescribe what will be the just and reasonable rate", and "as the maximum or minimum or both" for "as both the maximum and minimum", and inserted proviso relating to prescription by the Secretary of rates or charges on a percentage or per head basis at the election of the owner or agency or any other basis unless violative of section 206 of this title.

Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 95–409, §1(b)(3), substituted "other than the rate or charge or rates or charges" for "more or less than the rate or charge".

1939—Subsec. (a). Act Aug. 10, 1939, substituted "as both" for "or the".

Subsec. (b)(2). Act Aug. 10, 1939, substituted "more or less than the rate or charge so prescribed" for "other than the rate or charge so prescribed, or in excess of the maximum or less than the minimum so prescribed, as the case may be".
#### 1239.7200 Scope of subpart.

This subpart prescribes policies and procedures for the acquisition of cloud computing services.
#### 15.100 Scope of subpart.

This subpart describes some of the acquisition processes and techniques that may be used to design competitive acquisition strategies suitable for the specific circumstances of the acquisition.
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE

HEADQUARTERS AIR FORCE FLIGHT STANDARDS AGENCY

GLOBAL ACCESS FOR AMERICA 20 Mar 2013

MEMORANDUM FOR HQ FAA/AGC-10

FROM: HQ AFFSA/A3OF HQ AFFSA/AJW31AF Bldg 4, Room 107

6500 S. MacArthur Blvd Oklahoma City, OK 73169

SUBJECT: FAR Exemption 130H (R egulatory Docket No. FAA-2001-9409)

1. FAR Exemption 130A, was granted to the United States Air Force on 24 Mar 65, as amended by 130H, it exempts us from the provisions of Section 91.159 (c). Our requirement to conduct U-2 operations at or above flight level 600 under the provisions of this exemption remains unchanged. We hereby request that the current exemption be renewed IAW 14 CFR Part 11.

2. As operations under this exemption have been safely conducted for the past forty-five years, the Air Force requests your consideration in approving the renewal of this exemption. Please contact me with any questions at (405) 734-8424 or e-mail: hqaffsa.a3of@tinker.af.mil

.

ALAN W. MYRICK, Maj, USAF Chief, Aircrew Procedures
### §1354. Applicability to members of the Armed Forces

(a) Nothing contained in this subchapter shall be construed so as to limit, restrict, deny, or affect the coming into or departure from the United States of an alien member of the Armed Forces of the United States who is in the uniform of, or who bears documents identifying him as a member of, such Armed Forces, and who is coming to or departing from the United States under official orders or permit of such Armed Forces: Provided, That nothing contained in this section shall be construed to give to or confer upon any such alien any other privileges, rights, benefits, exemptions, or immunities under this chapter, which are not otherwise specifically granted by this chapter.

(b) If a person lawfully admitted for permanent residence is the spouse or child of a member of the Armed Forces of the United States, is authorized to accompany the member and reside abroad with the member pursuant to the member's official orders, and is so accompanying and residing with the member (in marital union if a spouse), then the residence and physical presence of the person abroad shall not be treated as—

(1) an abandonment or relinquishment of lawful permanent resident status for purposes of clause (i) of section 1101(a)(13)(C) of this title; or

(2) an absence from the United States for purposes of clause (ii) of such section.

(June 27, 1952, ch. 477, title II, ch. 9, §284, 66 Stat. 232; Pub. L. 110–181, div. A, title VI, §673, Jan. 28, 2008, 122 Stat. 185.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in subsec. (a), was in the original, "this Act", meaning act June 27, 1952, ch. 477, 66 Stat. 163, known as the Immigration and Nationality Act, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1101 of this title and Tables.

#### Amendments

2008—Pub. L. 110–181 designated existing provisions as subsec. (a) and added subsec. (b).
#### In the Matter of Sidney J. Ungar, Petitioner, v. Joseph A. Sarafite, as Judge of the Court of General Sessions of the County of New York, Respondent.

Determination, mandate of order and judgment of conviction unanimously affirmed, with costs to the respondent. No opinion. Concur — Rabin, J. P., Valente, McNally, Eager and Steuer, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 583 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 583

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To amend the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 to 
 authorize COPS grantees to use grant funds to hire veterans as career 
           law enforcement officers, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``American Law Enforcement Heroes Act 
of 2017''.

SEC. 2. PRIORITIZING HIRING AND TRAINING OF VETERANS.

    Section 1701(b)(2) of title I of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe 
Streets Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 3796dd(b)(2)) is amended by inserting 
``, including by prioritizing the hiring and training of veterans (as 
defined in section 101 of title 38, United States Code)'' after 
``Nation''.

            Passed the Senate May 16, 2017.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
115th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                 S. 583

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To amend the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 to 
 authorize COPS grantees to use grant funds to hire veterans as career 
           law enforcement officers, and for other purposes.
```