alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-15-00443-CR

Kristen E. MEWS,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 186th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014CR2856

Honorable Jefferson Moore, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE BARNARD, JUSTICE MARTINEZ, AND JUSTICE ALVAREZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the motion to dismiss is GRANTED 

and this appeal is DISMISSED. 

SIGNED August 12, 2015.

_________________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice
##### 



Exhibit 31.1 CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
RULES 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e),
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Marla L. Schaefer, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Claires Stores, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant
as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:  a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in
the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting. September 2, 2004
    
    /s/ Marla L. SchaeferMarla L. SchaeferCo-Chief Executive Officer
 21
### The Conterminous United States Mineral-Resource Assessment Program— Background information to accompany folio of geologic and mineral-resources maps of the Rolla 1° x 2° quadrangle, Missouri

By: Walden P. Pratt

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/cir1068

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- NGMDB Index Page:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

No abstract available.

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
### §7735. Enforcement actions of Attorney General

The Attorney General may—

(1) prosecute, in the name of the United States, all criminal violations of this chapter that are referred to the Attorney General by the Secretary or are brought to the notice of the Attorney General by any person;

(2) bring an action to enjoin the violation of or to compel compliance with this chapter, or to enjoin any interference by any person with the Secretary in carrying out this chapter, whenever the Secretary has reason to believe that the person has violated, or is about to violate this chapter, or has interfered, or is about to interfere, with the Secretary; and

(3) bring an action for the recovery of any unpaid civil penalty, funds under reimbursable agreements, late payment penalty, or interest assessed under this chapter.

(Pub. L. 106–224, title IV, §425, June 20, 2000, 114 Stat. 451.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this title", meaning title IV of Pub. L. 106–224, June 20, 2000, 114 Stat. 438, known as the Plant Protection Act, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of title IV to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 7701 of this title and Tables.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of functions of the Secretary of Agriculture relating to agricultural import and entry inspection activities under this chapter to the Secretary of Homeland Security, and for treatment of related references, see sections 231, 551(d), 552(d), and 557 of Title 6, Domestic Security, and the Department of Homeland Security Reorganization Plan of November 25, 2002, as modified, set out as a note under section 542 of Title 6.
1436.570 Prohibition against use of lead-based paint. ( a ) *Definitions.* As used in this section, “residential structure:” means any house, apartment, or structure intended for human habitation including any institutional structure where persons reside such as an orphanage, boarding school dormitory, day care center, or extended care facility.
( b ) The CO shall insert the clause at 1452.236-70, Prohibition Against Use of Lead-Based Paint, in solicitations and contracts when construction of residential structures or rehabilitation (including dismantling, demolition, or removal) of residential structures is contemplated.
### §2481. Plant variety protection

(a) If it appears that a certificate of plant variety protection should be issued on an application, a written notice of allowance shall be given or mailed to the owner. The notice shall specify the sum, constituting the issue fee, which shall be paid within one month thereafter.

(b) Upon timely payment of this sum, and provided that deposit of seed has been made in accordance with section 2422(3) 1 of this title, the certificate of plant variety protection shall issue.

(c) If any payment required by this section is not timely made, but is submitted with an additional fee prescribed by the Secretary within nine months after the due date or within such further time as the Secretary may allow, it shall be accepted.

(Pub. L. 91–577, title II, §81, Dec. 24, 1970, 84 Stat. 1551.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 2422(3) of this title, referred to in subsec. (b), was redesignated section 2422(4) of this title by Pub. L. 103–349, §4, Oct. 6, 1994, 108 Stat. 3139.

1 See References in Text note below.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.

SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Wayne J. Conner, Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
of Elgin National Industries, Inc., certify that:



| | 1. | This quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Elgin National Industries, Inc. fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in this quarterly report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Elgin National Industries, Inc.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  | /S/    WAYNE J.
CONNER                 
| |  | ---------------------------------------
| |  | Wayne J. Conner Chief Financial Officer



Date:   August 13, 2003
#### 1428.311 Solicitation provision and contract clause on liability insurance under cost-reimbursement contracts.
### §7486. Petition and review

#### (a) Petition

#### (1) In general

A person subject to an order may file with the Secretary a petition—

(A) stating that the order, a provision of the order, or an obligation imposed in connection with the order is not established in accordance with law; and

(B) requesting a modification of the order or obligation or an exemption from the order or obligation.

#### (2) Statute of limitations

A petition under paragraph (1) concerning an obligation may be filed not later than 2 years after the date of imposition of the obligation.

#### (3) Hearings

The petitioner shall be given the opportunity for a hearing on a petition filed under paragraph (1), in accordance with regulations issued by the Secretary.

#### (4) Ruling

After a hearing under paragraph (3), the Secretary shall issue a ruling on the petition that is the subject of the hearing, which shall be final if the ruling is in accordance with applicable law.

#### (b) Review

#### (1) Commencement of action

The district court of the United States for any district in which a person who is a petitioner under subsection (a) resides or carries on business shall have jurisdiction to review a ruling on the petition, if the person files a complaint not later than 20 days after the date of issuance of the ruling under subsection (a)(4).

#### (2) Process

Service of process in a proceeding under paragraph (1) may be made on the Secretary by delivering a copy of the complaint to the Secretary.

#### (3) Remands

If the court determines, under paragraph (1), that a ruling issued under subsection (a)(4) is not in accordance with applicable law, the court shall remand the matter to the Secretary with directions—

(A) to make such ruling as the court shall determine to be in accordance with law; or

(B) to take such further proceedings as, in the opinion of the court, the law requires.

#### (c) Enforcement

The pendency of proceedings instituted under subsection (a) may not impede, hinder, or delay the Secretary or the Attorney General from taking action under section 7487 of this title.

(Pub. L. 104–127, title V, §577, Apr. 4, 1996, 110 Stat. 1082.)
#### 16.404 Fixed-price contracts with award fees.

Award-fee provisions may be used in fixed-price contracts when the Government wishes to motivate a contractor and other incentives cannot be used because contractor performance cannot be measured objectively. Such contracts shall establish a fixed price (including normal profit) for the effort. This price will be paid for satisfactory contract performance. Award fee earned (if any) will be paid in addition to that fixed price. See 16.401(e) for the requirements relative to utilizing this contract type.

[74 FR 52859, Oct. 14, 2009]
05/12/201 1 17:56 FAX 2024935142 FAA •> DMS 0001/00 2 

e 

U.S. Department 

of Tronsportgtton 

Federa( Aviation 

Administration 

Hand Delivered 

May 11, ?.011 

Federal Aviation Administration 

600 Independence Avenue, SW 

Wilbur Wright Building • Suite 2W1000 

Washington, D.C. 20591 

Attn: Appellate Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

VA'TiMENTOF 

-'•DOniATiON 

Office of the Chief Counsel , ^ . 600 Independence Avenue, S.W 

EnfofcftmentDivision .,i l\ \ ! 3 A '-i:V?>#ington, D.C. 20691 

.V^"'<i ;.; :B 

M 

•V 

' 2wii 

-^BARING DOCKET 

Re; Tn th e Matte r of Empire Airline^ r Inc. , FAA Docket 

No. CP09NM0009 

Dear Sir or Madam: 

Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. §13.233 (c) (1), both the Complainant 

and Respondent request mutual extensions of time until 

June 22, 2011, for the filinq of their respectj,ve appeal 

briefs in the above-referenced matter. The appeal briefs 

are presently due May 23, 2011. 

Sincerely, 

James A, Barry 

Senior Attorney 

F:nforcement Division, AGC-300 

Office of the Chief Counsel 

(202) 267-8198 

cc: Courtney E. Felts, F.sq. 
05/12/2011 17:5G FAX 2024935142 FAA * DMS gl002/002 

ri 

Certificate of Service 

I hereby certify that on this date I have placed in 

the United States mail, postage prepaid, certified 

return-receipt requested, and sent by email transmission, 

a copy of Complainant's Entry of Appearance Letter I n th e 

Matte r o£ Ejnpire Airlines, Inc . , FAA Docket 

No. CP09NM0009, addressed tO: 

Courtney E. Felts, Esq. 

Senior Attorney 

Federal Express, Inc. 

3 62 0 Hacks Cross Road 

Building B, 3""^ Floor 

Memphis, Tennessee 38125-8800 

In addition, I hereby certify that on this date I have 

hand-delivered the original and one copy of the foregoing 

document in the United States mail, postage prepaid, 

certified return-receipt requested, addressed to: 

Federal Aviation Administration 

600 Independence Avenue, SW 

Wilbur Wright Building - Suite 2W1000 

Washington, D.C. 20591 

Attn; Appellate Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Bn^t'T^ 6<^Kr^K 

Dated; May 11 , 2011
Case: 1:12-cv-00653 Document #: 495 Filed: 06/22/15 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:25282
HVAC

MOTORS

DIRECT CURRENT

(DC) MOTORS

U FRAME

MOTORS

BRAKE VECTOR

DUTY

INVERTER

DUTY THREE PHASE

MULTI-SPEED C-FACE SINGLE &

THREE PHASE

EXPLOSION

PROOF

SEVERE

DUTY THREE PHASE

GEN. PURPOSE

SINGLE PHASE

GEN. PURPOSE

www.emersonmotors.com 19 ®

APPLICATIONS:

Designed for air compressors, pumps, conveyors, blowers and general industrial equipment.

FEATURES:

* Double Shielded Ball Bearings

* Class B Insulation, Continuous Duty, 40C Ambient

* Capacitor Start, Induction Run

* F1 Assembly

* Reversible Rotation

Voltage List

Catalog

Frame Number

"C" Dim.

(inches)

Multiplier

Symbol

Ship Wt

HP RPM (lbs) Notes

Full Load 

SF Amps

1/4 1800 115/230 56C 6200 $251 DS-3FMP 1.15 10.4 19 5.8/2.9 25

1/3 3600 115/230 56C 6201 $248 DS-3FMP 1.00 10.6 21 6.4/3.2 25

3600 115/230 56C T13CA1PC $226 DS-3FMP 1.00 10.5 20 6.4/3.2 24

1800 100-120/200-240 56C 6209 $305 DS-3FMP 1.35 11.9 21 4.2-3.9/2.1-2.0 23

1800 100-120/200-240 56C 6210 $277 DS-3FMP 1.35 11.9 22 4.2-3.9/2.1-2.0 24

1800 115/230 56C T13C2PC $244 DS-3F 1.00 10.5 21 6.8/3.4 25

1/2 3600 115/230 56C 6202 $250 DS-3FMP 1.00 11.3 22 8.0/4.0 25

3600 115/230 56C T12CA1PC $262 DS-3FMP 1.00 11.3 22 8.0/4.0 24

1800 100-120/200-240 56C 6211 $350 DS-3FMP 1.25 12.6 27 6.3-5.6/3.1-2.8 23

1800 100-120/200-240 56C 6212 $328 DS-3FMP 1.25 12.0 25 6.3-5.6/3.1-2.8 24

1800 115/230 56C T12C2PC $310 DS-3F 1.00 12.8 23 9.0/4.5 25

3/4 3600 115/230 56C 6203 $281 DS-3FMP 1.00 11.3 30 9.8/4.9 25

3600 115/230 56C T34CA1PC $295 DS-3FMP 1.00 11.3 27 9.8/4.9 24

1800 100-120/200-240 56C 6213 $424 DS-3FMP 1.25 12.3 33 9.2-8.4/4.6-4.2 23

1800 100-120/200-240 56C 6214 $401 DS-3FMP 1.25 11.3 32 9.2-8.4/4.6-4.2 24

1 3600 115/208-230 56C T1C1PC $340 DS-3FMP 1.00 11.4 28 12.0/6.0 25

1800 100-120/200-240 56C 6215 $441 DS-3FMP 1.15 12.5 40 11.0-9.2/5.5-4.7 23

1800 100-120/200-240 56C 6216 $424 DS-3FMP 1.15 12.6 43 11.0-9.2/5.5-4.7 24

1800 115/230 56C T1C2PHC $399 DS-3F 1.00 12.3 33 13.6/6.8 25

1-1/2 3600 115/230 56HC T32C1PHC $440 DS-3FMP 1.00 12.9 42 15.6/7.8 25

1800 115/230 56HC T32C2PHC $473 DS-3F 1.00 12.8 41 17.6/8.8 25

2 3600 115/230 145TC 6205 $552 DS-3FMP 1.00 13.8 43 20.4/10.2 25

3600 115/230 56HC 6204 $552 DS-3FMP 1.00 13.3 42 20.4/10.2 25

1800 115/230 145TC 6206 $684 DS-3FMP 1.00 14.6 46 19.0/9.5 25

1800 115/230 145TC 6207 $695 DS-3FMP 1.00 14.6 34 19.0/9.5 23

1800 115/230 56HC T2C2PHC $544 DS-3F 1.00 13.3 43 19.0/9.5 25

3 3600 230 145TC 6208 $620 DS-3FMP 1.00 14.6 55 13.5 23

Note 23 Manual Reset Thermal Overload Protector

Note 24

Note 25 Non-protected

Automatic Reset Thermal Overload Protector

General Purpose Single Phase, Capacitor Start

Totally Enclosed Fan Cooled (TEFC) C Face Footed

EERE-2007-BT-STD-0007 COMMENT 30
#### Irish Welding Supply Corp., Plaintiff, v. George Roetzer et al., Defendants. (And Another Action.)

Motion to dismiss appeal denied because of the inadequacy of the papers without prejudice to the right to renew upon sufficient papers which will clearly show the factual situation.
Order entered February 4, 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 18
- 00118
- CR
ANTONIO LAMAR COCHRA N, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the Cr iminal District Court No. 1

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F15
- 76529
- H



### O RDER Before the Court is appellant’s January 31, 2019 third motion for extension of time to file appellant’s brief. We GRANT the motion and ORDER appellant’s brief filed on or before February 15, 2019 . If appellant’s brief is not filed by February 15, 2019 , this appeal may be abated for the trial court to make findings in accordance with ru le of appellate procedure 38.8.

/s/ BILL PEDERSEN, III JUSTICE
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

TIMOTHY BARNES,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

ROUTH CRABTREE OLSEN PC; et al.,

Defendants

- Appellees. No. 16

- 35418

D.C. No. 3:15

- cv

- 01001

- BR

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Anna J. Brown, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 11, 2018 **

Before: SILVERMAN, PAEZ, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

Timothy Barnes appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing

his action alleging violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”)

and state law claims. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de

novo a district court’s dismissal under Fede ral Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6).

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Barnes ’ request for oral argument, set forth in his opening brief, is denied. 

# FILED

APR 17 2018

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 16

- 35418

Cervantes v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. , 656 F.3d 1034, 1040

- 41 (9th

Cir. 2011). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Barnes’ claims under the FDCPA and

section 646.639 of the Oregon Unfair Trade Practic es Act because the alleged

communications were not attempts to collect a debt as defined by the FDCPA. See

Ho v. ReconTrust Co., NA , 858 F.3d 568, 572 (9th Cir. 2017) (foreclosure actions

are not attempts to collect “debt” as that term is generally define d by the FDCPA);

Dowers v. Nationstar Mortg., LLC , 852 F.3d 964, 970 (9th Cir. 2017) (explaining

that “while the FDCPA regulates security interest enforcement activity, it does so

only through Section 1692f(6),” and that “[a]s for the remaining FDCPA

provi sions, ‘debt collection’ refers only to the collection of a money debt”); see

also Or. Rev. Stat. § 646.6 4 3 ( compliance with the FDCPA demonstrates

compliance with ORS 646.639)

.

The district cou rt properly dismissed Barnes’ civil conspiracy claim because

Barnes failed to allege facts sufficient to state any plausible claim for relief. See

Granewich v. Harding

, 985 P.2d 788

, 792

- 93 ( Or. 1999) (civil conspiracy is not a

separate theory of recovery; rather it is a way in which a person may become

jointly lia ble fo r another’ s unlawful conduct )

.

The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying Barnes’ motion for

reconsideration under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 59(e) because Barnes3 16

- 35418

failed to establish any basis for such relief. See Sch. Dist . No. 1J, Multnomah Cty.,

Or. v. ACandS, Inc. , 5 F.3d 1255, 1262

- 63 (9th Cir. 1993) (setting forth standard of

review and grounds for reconsideration).

We do not consider matters not properly raised before the district court, or

matters not specifically and distinctly raised and argued in the opening brief. See

Padgett v. Wright , 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

AFFIRMED.
-84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72 -70

36 38 40 42 44



### ★ ▲ ▲

▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 1000 18 12 06 00 05/30 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 30 May 06

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.86 N 77.06 WMeters AGL
#### GOLDBACHER, Respondent, v. EGGERS, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

April Term, 1903.)

Action by Nina Grace Goldbacher against George W. Eggers.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment (76 N. Y. Supp. 881) affirmed, with costs. [Nothing for publication in this case.]
EXHIBIT
      32.1





**CERTIFICATION**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Sparta Commercial Services, Inc. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2008, as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date therein specified (the
      "Report"), I, Anthony L. Havens, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
      hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.








/s/
      Anthony L. Havens


Anthony
      L. Havens


Chief
      Executive Officer


Date:
      August 13, 2008
### §1446i. Repealed. Pub. L. 103–354, title I, §119(a)(6), Oct. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 3208

Section, act Oct. 31, 1949, ch. 792, title II, §208, as added Nov. 28, 1990, Pub. L. 101–624, title XI, §1126, 104 Stat. 3507, related to disaster payments for 1991 through 1995 crops of peanuts, soybeans, sugar beets, and sugarcane.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Oct. 13, 1994, and applicable to provision of crop insurance under Federal Crop Insurance Act (7 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.) beginning with 1995 crop year, with such Act, as in effect on the day before Oct. 13, 1994, to continue to apply with respect to 1994 crop year, see section 120 of Pub. L. 103–354, set out as an Effective Date of 1994 Amendment note under section 1502 of this title.