alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1339.107-70 Information security. ( a ) For all service acquisitions over the micro-purchase threshold, contracting professionals shall coordinate with the designated Contracting Officer Representative (COR) to complete the *Information Security in Acquisition Checklist.*
( b ) When the *Information Security in Acquisition Checklist* indicates that Clause 1352.239-73, *Security Requirements for Information Technology Resources,* is needed, contracting officers shall insert the clause in the solicitation and contracts. If the checklist indicates that the Certification and Accreditation requirement in Clause 1352.239-73 is not required, the contracting officer shall include the statement “*The Certification and Accreditation (C&A) requirements of Clause 1352.239-73 do not apply, and a Security Accreditation Package is not required”* in the statement of work.
( c ) Contracting professionals shall insert the appropriate risk designation clause from CAM 1337.70 into DOC solicitations and contracts for services depending upon the level of contractor access privileges to DOC IT systems. In addition, contracting professionals shall document the official contract file to include the rationale for the designated risk level.
# Materials Not Included in **Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket**

Docket Number: F AA- 2012 - 1067 Directorate Identifier: 2011NM231AD SBA F50 - 496, IA --- 5/11/10 SBA F900 - 388, IA --- 5/11/10 SBA F900EX- 329, IB --- 8/17/10 SBA F2000 - 358, IB --- 8/17/10 SBA F2000EX- 171, IA --- 5/11/10 > F50 - 496, R1 --- 2/15/10 > F50 - 496 --- 10/22/09 > F900 - 388, R2 --- 3/10/10 > F900 - 388, R1 --- 2/15/10 > F900 - 388 --- 10/22/09 > F900EX- 329, R2 --- 2/15/10 > F900EX- 329, R1 --- 10/22/09 > F900EX- 329 --- 9/25/09 > F2000 - 358, R2 --- 2/15/10 > F2000 - 358, R1 --- 10/30/09 > F2000 - 358 --- 9/25/09 > F2000EX- 171, R2 --- 2/15/10 > F2000EX- 171, R1 --- 10/22/09 > F2000EX- 171 --- 7/6/09 Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket 

### MA **Y BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate Rules Docket 1601 Lind Ave. SW., Renton, WA 98057 425.227.1221 **DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Form Date: 0 3/05/2008
### §6311. Authorization of appropriations; regulations

#### (a) In general

There are authorized to be appropriated for each fiscal year such funds as are necessary to carry out this chapter.

#### (b) Administrative expenses

Funds appropriated under subsection (a) shall not be available for payment of the expenses or expenditures of the Board or the Committee in administering any provision of any order issued under this chapter.

#### (c) Regulations

The Secretary may issue such regulations as are necessary to carry out this chapter, including regulations relating to the assessment of late payment charges.

(Pub. L. 101–624, title XIX, §1976, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 3904.)
§ 750.64 Claim procedures. ( a ) The general provisions of subpart A of this part shall apply in determining what is a proper claim, who is a proper claimant, and how a claim is to be investigated and processed under 10 U.S.C. 2737 and this section.
( b ) A claim is presented when the DON receives from a claimant or the claimant's duly authorized agent, written notification of a nonscope claim incident accompanied by a demand for money damages in a sum certain.
( c ) A claimant may amend a claim at any time prior to final action. Amendments will be submitted in writing and signed by the claimant or the claimant's duly authorized agent.
( d ) Claims submitted under the provisions of the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) or Military Claims Act (MCA) shall be considered automatically for an award under this section when payment would otherwise be barred because the DON personnel were not in the scope of their employment at the time of the incident. If a tender of payment under this section is not accepted by the claimant in full satisfaction of the claim, no award will be made, and the claim will be denied pursuant to the rules applicable to the statute under which it was submitted.
( e ) Damages caused by latent defects of ordinary, commercial type, Government equipment that were not payable under the MCA, Foreign Claims Act, or FTCA are payable under this section.
( f ) Nonscope claims for damages caused by local national DON employees overseas are also payable under this section if the injury was caused by the use of Government equipment.
( g ) Payment may not be made on a nonscope claim unless the claimant accepts the amount offered in full satisfaction of the claim and signs a settlement agreement.
( h ) Payment for nonscope claims adjudicated by field commands will be affected through their local disbursing office by use of funds obtained from the Judge Advocate General.
( i ) Claims submitted solely under 10 U.S.C. 2737 shall be promptly considered. If a nonscope claim is denied, the claimant shall be informed of reasons in writing and advised he may appeal in writing to the Secretary of the Navy (Judge Advocate General) provided the appeal is received within 30 days of the notice of denial. The provisions of § 750.51(b) of subpart C also apply to denials of nonscope claims.
United States Court of Appeals 

for the Fifth Circuit 

No. 21-50442 

Summary Calendar 

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee, 

versus

Carlos Alfonso Dominguez, 

Defendant—Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Western District of Texas 

USDC No. 3:20-CR-2348-1 

Before King, Costa, and Ho, Circuit Judges 

Per Curiam:*

Carlos Alfonso Dominguez pleaded guilty to one count of importation 

of 500 grams or more of methamphetamine and one count of possession with 

intent to distribute 500 grams or more of methamphetamine. He challenges 

*

 Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4. 

United States Court of Appeals 

Fifth Circuit 

FILED 

February 2, 2022 

Lyle W. Cayce 

Clerk 

Case: 21-50442 Document: 00516189707 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/02/2022
No. 21-50442 

2 

the procedural and substantive reasonableness of his within-guidelines 

sentence of 63 months of imprisonment. 

We review sentencing decisions for reasonableness using a 

“bifurcated review process.” United States v. Nguyen, 854 F.3d 276, 280 (5th 

Cir. 2017); see Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007). First, we 

“examine whether the district court committed any significant procedural 

error.” Nguyen, 854 F.3d at 280. “If the district court’s decision is 

procedurally sound, we then consider the substantive reasonableness of the 

sentence.” Id. Dominguez’s arguments at sentencing alerted the district 

court to, and so preserved for appeal, his claims of procedural and substantive 

error. See Holguin-Hernandez v. United States, 140 S. Ct. 762, 764, 766-67 

(2020). We therefore review the district court’s interpretation of the safetyvalve provisions de novo and the decision whether to apply a safety-valve 

adjustment for clear error. United States v. Flanagan, 80 F.3d 143, 145 (5th 

Cir. 1996); see also United States v. Towns, 718 F.3d 404, 412 (5th Cir. 2013). 

Despite Dominguez’s arguments to the contrary, the record reflects 

that the district court applied safety-valve relief under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(f) to 

sentence him below the 120-month mandatory minimum and correctly 

calculated the applicable guidelines range of 63 to 78 months of 

imprisonment. Additionally, there is no merit to his claim of substantive 

unreasonableness. A within-guidelines sentence is presumptively 

reasonable. United States v. Hernandez, 876 F.3d 161, 166 (5th Cir. 2017). 

There is no indication that an important factor was overlooked, that an 

improper factor was given significant weight, or that the court failed to 

provide any required explanation. Instead, Dominguez’s argument is no 

more than a request for us to reweigh the statutory sentencing factors, which 

we will not do. Id. at 167; see also Gall, 552 U.S. at 51. 

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. 

Case: 21-50442 Document: 00516189707 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/02/2022
### §2009c. Strategic plans

#### (a) In general

The Secretary shall direct each of the Directors of Rural Economic and Community Development State Offices to prepare a strategic plan—

(1) for each State for the delivery of assistance under this subchapter in the State; and

(2) for each federally recognized Indian tribe for the delivery of assistance under this subchapter to the Indian tribe.

#### (b) Assistance

#### (1) In general

Financial assistance for rural development provided under this subchapter for a State or a federally recognized Indian tribe shall be used only for orderly community development that is consistent with the strategic plan of the State or Indian tribe.

#### (2) Rural area

Assistance under this subchapter may only be provided in a rural area.

#### (3) Small communities

In carrying out this subchapter in a State, the Secretary shall give priority to communities with the smallest populations and lowest per capita income.

#### (c) Review

The Secretary shall review the strategic plan of each State and federally recognized Indian tribe not later than 60 days after receiving the plan, and at least once every 5 years thereafter.

#### (d) Contents

A strategic plan of a State or federally recognized Indian tribe under this section shall be a plan that—

(1) coordinates economic, human, and community development plans and related activities proposed for an affected area;

(2) provides that the State or federally recognized Indian tribe, as appropriate, and an affected community (including local institutions and organizations that have contributed to the planning process) shall act as full partners in the process of developing and implementing the plan;

(3) identifies goals, methods, and benchmarks for measuring the success of carrying out the plan and how the plan relates to local or regional ecosystems;

(4) in the case of a State, provides for the involvement, in the preparation of the plan, of State, local, private, and public persons, State rural development councils, federally recognized Indian tribes in the State, and community-based organizations;

(5) identifies the amount and source of Federal and non-Federal resources that are available for carrying out the plan; and

(6) includes such other information as may be required by the Secretary.

(Pub. L. 87–128, title III, §381D, as added Pub. L. 104–127, title VII, §761, Apr. 4, 1996, 110 Stat. 1140.)
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 10 (Friday, January 15, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 4169]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-00793]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Delegation of Authority No. 354-1]


Delegation of Authority to the Associate Comptroller of Certain 
Authorities Regarding Debt Collection and Waiver of Claims

Section 1. Delegation

    By virtue of the authority vested in the Secretary of State by the 
laws and authorities of the United States, including those set forth in 
22 U.S.C. 2651a; the Debt Collection Improvement Act of 1996, Public 
Law 104-134 (1996); the Office of Management and Budget's Determination 
with Respect to Transfer of Functions Pursuant to Public Law 104-316 
(December 17, 1996); the Travel and Transportation Reform Act of 1998, 
Public Law 105-264 (1998); 5 U.S.C. 4108, 5379, 5514, 5522, 5524a, 
5705, 5922, and 8707; 22 U.S.C. 2671, 2716, 4047 and 4071; and 31 
U.S.C. Chapter 37, and delegated to the Comptroller by Delegation of 
Authority 354, dated April 23, 2013, I hereby delegate, to the extent 
authorized by law, the duties, functions and responsibilities for the 
administrative collection, compromise, suspension, termination of 
Department collection, advance decision, settlement, and waiver of 
claims of or against debtors of the Department of State, pursuant to 
the above-mentioned authorities, to the Associate Comptroller of the 
Department of State.

Section 2. General Provisions

    (a) The Secretary of State, the Deputy Secretary, the Deputy 
Secretary for Management and Resources, the Under Secretary for 
Management, or the Comptroller may at any time exercise any function 
delegated by this delegation of authority. Functions delegated herein 
may not be re-delegated.
    (b) Any reference in this delegation of authority to any act, 
executive order, determination, delegation of authority, regulation, or 
procedure shall be deemed to be a reference to such act, executive 
order, determination, delegation of authority, regulation, or procedure 
as amended from time to time.
    (c) This Delegation of Authority shall be published in the Federal 
Register.

    Dated: December 14, 2020.
Jeffrey C. Mounts,
Comptroller, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2021-00793 Filed 1-14-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-37-P
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

February 17, 2010 

jam 

Order 

 

February 17, 2010 

140488 (26) 

BENNIE GRAVES, 

 Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 140488 

 COA: 293749 

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, 

 Defendant-Appellee. 

___________________________________ 

 On order of the Chief Justice, the motion to waive fees is considered and it 

is DENIED because MCL 600.2963 requires that a prisoner pursuing a civil action be 

liable for filing fees. 

 Within 21 days of the certification of this order, plaintiff shall pay to the 

Clerk of the Court the initial partial filing fee of $9.00, shall submit a copy of this order 

with the payment, and shall refile the copy of the pleadings which is being returned 

with this order. Failure to comply with this order shall result in the appeal not being 

filed in this Court. 

 If plaintiff timely files the partial fee and refiles the pleadings, monthly 

payments shall be made to the Department of Corrections in an amount of 50 percent of 

the deposits made to plaintiff’s account until the payments equal the balance due of 

$366.00. This amount shall then be remitted to this Court. 

 Pursuant to MCL 600.2963(8) plaintiff shall not file further appeals in this 

Court until the entry fee in this case is paid in full. 

 The Clerk of the Court shall furnish two copies of this order to plaintiff and 

return plaintiff’s pleadings with this order.
1401.601 General. ( a ) The authority and responsibility vested in the Secretary to contract for authorized supplies and services is delegated to Assistant Secretaries.
( b ) The contracting authority and responsibility delegated to Assistant Secretaries may be redelegated to heads of bureaus and offices under their supervision in accordance with 200 DM 3. Such redelegations are published in bureau chapters of the Part 200 series of the Departmental Manual.
( c ) Bureau heads and assistant or associate heads thereof (known as HCAs as defined in 1402.1) may redelegate contracting authority only as prescribed in 1401.603.
### §8719. Period of effectiveness

This subchapter shall be effective beginning with the 2008 crop year of each covered commodity through the 2012 crop year.

(Pub. L. 110–234, title I, §1109, May 22, 2008, 122 Stat. 953; Pub. L. 110–246, §4(a), title I, §1109, June 18, 2008, 122 Stat. 1664, 1681.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Pub. L. 110–234 and Pub. L. 110–246 enacted identical sections. Pub. L. 110–234 was repealed by section 4(a) of Pub. L. 110–246.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Enactment of this section and repeal of Pub. L. 110–234 by Pub. L. 110–246 effective May 22, 2008, the date of enactment of Pub. L. 110–234, see section 4 of Pub. L. 110–246, set out as a note under section 8701 of this title.
#### In the Matter of Sharretts, Paley *&*Carter, Respondents, against Rodriguez Shipping, Inc., Appellant.

Order fixing and determining the lien of attorneys for legal services unanimously modified on the law and on the facts to the extent of fixing the lien at 20% of the sums received as refunds, and, as so modified, affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to appellant. In our view the record amply demonstrates that the 23 shipments about which the parties are in dispute were covered by the retainer agreement executed in June, 1953, wherein the attorneys’ fee was fixed at 20% of any customs refunds obtained without a trial, and not by the retainer agreement of July, 1950 providing for 50% of all refunds. It is clear to us that Empresas Rodriguez, S. A., was petitioners’ client and was treated as such with respect to the 23 claims and not appellant Rodriguez Shipping, Inc., with whom the 1950 arrangement was made. Any doubts must be resolved against petitioners who had sufficient opportunity at the time that negotiations were had leading up to the signing of the retainer of June, 1953 to clarify the position which they took only after the refunds had been obtained. Settle order. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, Valente and Stevens, JJ.
#### STATE v. TURNER

No. 502P97

Case below: 127 N.C.App. 554

Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 4 December 1997. Motion by Attorney General to dismiss appeal denied 4 December 1997.
### **CHAPTER 14—AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATIONS**

#### SUBCHAPTER I—GENERAL PROVISIONS

Sec.
361.
Repealed.
361a.
Congressional declaration of purpose; definitions.
361b.
Congressional statement of policy; researches, investigations and experiments.
361c.
Authorization of appropriations and allotments of grants.
361d.
Use of funds.
361e.
Payment of allotments to State agricultural experiment stations; directors and treasurers or other officers; accounting; reports to Secretary; replacement by States of diminished, lost or misapplied allotments; subsequent allotments or payments contingent on such replacement.
361f.
Publications of experiment stations; free mailing.
361g.
Duties of Secretary; ascertainment of entitlement of State to funds; plans of work.
361h.
Relation of college or university to State unaffected; division of appropriations.
361i.
Power to amend, repeal, etc., reserved.
362 to 383. Transferred, Repealed, or Omitted.
384.
Card index of agricultural literature; copies to be furnished by Secretary.
385.
South Carolina Experiment Station; cooperation by Secretary of Agriculture; lump sum appropriation.
385a.
Authorization of appropriations.
386 to 386g. Repealed.

#### SUBCHAPTER II—EXPERIMENT STATIONS FOR PROPAGATION OF TREES, SHRUBS, VINES, AND VEGETABLES

387.
Station for semi-arid or dry-land regions; establishment.
387a.
Authorization of appropriations.
388.
Station for southern Great Plains area; establishment.
388a.
Authorization of appropriations.
389.
Transfer of certain dry land and irrigation field stations to States.
389a.
Conditions of transfer of dry land and irrigation field stations; reservation of mineral rights.

#### SUBCHAPTER III—RESEARCH FACILITIES

390.
Definitions.
390a.
Review process.
390b.
Competitive grant program.
390c.
Applicability of chapter 10 of title 5.
390d.
Authorization of appropriations.
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 13 (Friday, January 22, 2021)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 6611]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-00464]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Parts 1 and 54

[GN Docket No. 20-32; Report No. 3165; FRS 17372]


Petitions for Reconsideration of Action in Rulemaking Proceeding

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Petitions for Reconsideration.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Petitions for Reconsideration (Petitions) have been filed in 
the Commission's rulemaking proceeding by David A. LaFuria, on behalf 
of Smith Bagley, Inc., Russell D. Lukas, on behalf of Coalition of 
Rural Wireless Carriers, Carri Bennet, on behalf of Rural Wireless 
Association, Inc. and Jill Canfield, on behalf of NTCA-The Rural 
Broadband Association, Matthew B. Gerst, on behalf of CTIA and Maurita 
Coley, on behalf of Multicultural Media, Telecom and internet Council 
Convenors, 5G Fund Supporters.

DATES: Oppositions to the Petitions must be filed on or before February 
8, 2021. Replies to an opposition must be filed on or before February 
16, 2021.

ADDRESSES: Federal Communications Commission, 45 L Street NE, 
Washington, DC 20554.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Valerie M. Barrish, Auctions Division, 
Office of Economics and Analytics, (202) 418-0660 or 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#0254636e67706b672c406370706b716a426461612c656d74"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="df89beb3baadb6baf19dbeadadb6acb79fb9bcbcf1b8b0a9">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a summary of the Commission's 
document, Report No. 3165, released January 6, 2021. The full text of 
the Petitions can be accessed online via the Commission's Electronic 
Comment Filing System at: http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/. The Commission 
will not send a Congressional Review Act (CRA) submission to Congress 
or the Government Accountability Office pursuant to the CRA, 5 U.S.C. 
801(a)(1)(A), because no rules are being adopted by the Commission.
    Subject: Establishing a 5G Fund for Rural America, FCC 20-150, 
published at 85 FR 75770, November 25, 2020, in GN Docket No. 20-32. 
This document is being published pursuant to 47 CFR 1.429(e). See also 
47 CFR 1.4(b)(1) and 1.429(f), (g).
    Number of Petitions Filed: 5.

Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene Dortch,
Secretary, Office of the Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-00464 Filed 1-21-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>