alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 989.7 Requests from Non-Air Force agencies or entities. ( a ) Non-Air Force agencies or entities may request the Air Force to undertake an action, such as issuing a permit or outleasing Air Force property, that may primarily benefit the requester or an agency other than the Air Force. The EPF and other Air Force staff elements must identify such requests and coordinate with the proponent of the non-Air Force proposal, as well as with concerned state, Tribal, and local governments.
( b ) Air Force decisions on such proposals must take into consideration the potential environmental impacts of the applicant's proposed activity (as described in an Air Force environmental document), insofar as the proposed action involves Air Force property or programs, or requires Air Force approval.
( c ) The Air Force may require the requester to prepare, at the requester's expense, an analysis of environmental impacts (40 CFR 1506.5), or the requester may be required to pay for an EA or EIS to be prepared by a contractor selected and supervised by the Air Force. The EPF may permit requesters to submit draft EAs for their proposed actions, except for actions described in § 989.16(a) and (b), or for actions the EPF has reason to believe will ultimately require an EIS. For EISs, the EPF has the responsibility to prepare the environmental document, although responsibility for funding remains with the requester. The fact that the requester has prepared environmental documents at its own expense does not commit the Air Force to allow or undertake the proposed action or its alternatives. The requester is not entitled to any preference over other potential parties with whom the Air Force might contract or make similar arrangements.
( d ) In no event is the requester who prepares or funds an environmental analysis entitled to reimbursement from the Air Force. When requesters prepare environmental documents outside the Air Force, the Air Force must independently evaluate and approve the scope and content of the environmental analyses before using the analyses to fulfill EIAP requirements. Any outside environmental analysis must evaluate reasonable alternatives as defined in § 989.8.
#### 1417.206 Evaluation.

The determination in FAR 17.206(b) shall be approved by the CCO prior to soliciting offers.
AO 450(Rev. 5/85)Judgment in a Civil Case

United States District Court

Northern District of Illinois

Eastern Division

State of Illinois ex rel, Schad, et al JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE

v. Case Number: 12 C 586

hhgregg Inc.

G Jury Verdict. This action came before the Court for a trial by jury. The issues have been

tried and the jury rendered its verdict.

O Decision by Court. This action came to hearing before the Court. The issues have

been heard and a decision has been rendered.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Relator’s Motion to Remand to the

State Court is granted.

Thomas G. Bruton, Clerk of Court

Date: 2/22/2012 ________________________________

/s/ Wanda A. Parker, Deputy Clerk

Case: 1:12-cv-00586 Document #: 21 Filed: 02/22/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:78
Exhibit 31.1
 
      a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andd)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 June 6, 2011
    /s/ Eugene S. KahnEugene S. KahnChief Executive Officer
#### 1542.703-2 Certificate of indirect costs.

The Head of the Contracting Activity may waive the certification requirement set forth in FAR 42.703-2.

[61 FR 57339, Nov. 6, 1996]
1327.303 Contract clauses. ( a ) The designee authorized to determine, at contract award, that it would be in the national interest to sublicense foreign governments or international organizations pursuant to any existing or future treaty or agreement is set forth in CAM 1301.70.
( b ) The designee authorized to determine that restriction or elimination of the right to retain title to any subject invention will better promote the policy and objectives of chapter 18 of title 35 of the United States Code is set forth in CAM 1301.70.
( c ) The designee authorized to determine, at contract award, that it would be in the national interest to sublicense foreign governments or international organizations pursuant to any existing or future treaty or agreement is set forth in CAM 1301.70.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 710 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 710

 To reinstate and extend the deadline for commencement of construction 
      of a hydroelectric project involving Jennings Randolph Dam.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 23, 2017

  Mr. Manchin (for himself and Mrs. Capito) introduced the following 
bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To reinstate and extend the deadline for commencement of construction 
      of a hydroelectric project involving Jennings Randolph Dam.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REINSTATEMENT AND EXTENSION OF TIME FOR A FEDERAL ENERGY 
              REGULATORY COMMISSION PROJECT INVOLVING JENNINGS RANDOLPH 
              DAM.

    (a) Extension of Time.--Notwithstanding the time period specified 
in section 13 of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 806) that would 
otherwise apply to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission project 
numbered 12715 (referred to in this section as the ``project''), the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (referred to in this section as 
the ``Commission'') may, at the request of the licensee for the 
project, and after reasonable notice, in accordance with the good 
faith, due diligence, and public interest requirements of, and the 
procedures of the Commission under, that section, extend the time 
period during which the licensee is required to commence the 
construction of the project for not more than 3 consecutive 2-year 
periods that begin on the date of the expiration of the extension 
originally issued by the Commission.
    (b) Obligation of Licensee.--Any obligation of the licensee for the 
project for the payment of annual charges under section 10(e) of the 
Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 803(e)) shall commence on the expiration 
of the time period to commence construction of the project, as extended 
by the Commission under subsection (a).
    (c) Reinstatement of Expired License.--
            (1) In general.--If the period required for the 
        commencement of construction of the project has expired before 
        the date of enactment of this Act, the Commission may reinstate 
        the license effective as of the date of the expiration of the 
        license.
            (2) Extension.--If the Commission reinstates the license 
        under paragraph (1), the first extension authorized under 
        subsection (a) shall take effect on the date of the expiration 
        of the license.
                                 <all>
```
### §7491. Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated such sums as are necessary to carry out this subchapter. Amounts made available under this section or otherwise made available to the Department, and amounts made available under any other marketing or promotion order, may not be used to pay any administrative expense of the Board.

(Pub. L. 104–127, title V, §582, Apr. 4, 1996, 110 Stat. 1083.)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000032312
<NAME> EMCEE BROADCAST PRODUCTS, INC.
       
  <S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         475,951
<SECURITIES>                                 3,489,653
<RECEIVABLES>                                  642,251
<ALLOWANCES>                                    70,000
<INVENTORY>                                  3,639,207
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             8,695,864
<PP&E>                                       2,828,148
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,080,885
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,764,110
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          736,735
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                        73,084
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                   8,248,942
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,764,110
<SALES>                                      5,171,345
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,171,345
<CGS>                                        3,738,205
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,811,457
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             (149,625)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                36,454
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              57,511
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (490,487)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (170,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (320,487)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (320,487)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.08)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.2
 
      a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b)
    
    [Intentionally omitted];c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andd)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 September 12, 2008
    /s/ J. Per BrodinJ. Per BrodinChief Financial Officer 35
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Douglas H. Miller, Chief Executive Officer of EXCO
Resources, Inc. certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of EXCO Resources, Inc.; and
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |                                          
|------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------
|Date: March 3, 2010 |  | /s/ DOUGLAS H. MILLER                    
|                    |  | Douglas H. Miller Chief
Executive Officer
<PAGE>

                                   Exhibit 23







               Consent of Independent Certified Public Accountants



The Board of Directors
AM Communications, Inc.


     We have issued our report dated May 24, 2000 accompanying the financial
statements included in the Annual Report of AM Communications, Inc. on Form
10-KSB for the year ended April 1, 2000. We hereby consent to the incorporation
by reference of said report in the Registration Statements of AM Communications,
Inc. on Forms S-8 (File No. 333-32826, effective March 20, 2000, File No.
333-35988 effective May 1, 2000).




Grant Thornton LLP
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
July 10, 2000
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

JAMES COLEY,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D16-4202

[August 17, 2017]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Martin J. Bidwill, 

Judge; L.T. Case No. 97-21202CF10A.

James Coley, Wewahitchka, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

DAMOORGIAN, LEVINE and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### 1313.305 Imprest funds and third party drafts.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the 
Company's Balance Sheet as of September 30, 1997 and the Statement Of Income
for the period ended September 30, 1997, and is qualified in its entirety by 
reference to such financial statements.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         375,933
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               399,764<F1>
<PP&E>                                      39,000,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              35,820,840
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,578,924
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0    
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,578,924
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,578,924
<SALES>                                      4,514,063<F2>
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,521,844<F3>
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,753,414<F4>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,768,430
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,768,430
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,768,430
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   838.92<F5>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   838.92<F5>
<FN>
<F1>Includes prepaid rent
<F2>Rental income
<F3>Includes dividend income
<F4>Leasehold rent, supervisory fees and amortization of leasehold 
<F5>Earnings per $10,000 participation unit, based on 3,300 participation 
    units outstanding during the year
</FN>
        



</TABLE>
#### 1201.201 Maintenance of the FAR.
Exhibit 32.1

                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Swiss Medica, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Raghunath Kilambi, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.


      March 30, 2004

                   /s/     RAGHUNATH KILAMBI
                   -------------------------------------
                   By: Raghunath Kilambi
                   Chief Executive Officer


A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906, OR OTHER
DOCUMENT AUTHENTICATING, ACKNOWLEDGING, OR OTHERWISE ADOPTING THE SIGNATURE THAT
APPEARS IN TYPED FORM WITHIN THE ELECTRONIC VERSION OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT
REQUIRED BY SECTION 906, HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO SWISS MEDICA, INC. AND WILL BE
RETAINED BY SWISS MEDICA, INC. AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
1527.404 Basic rights in data clause. The Contracting Officer shall insert in the *Limited Rights Notice* when using Alternate II of FAR 52.227-14 the following purposes for disclosure of limited data outside the Government. ( a ) Use (except for manufacture) by support service contractors;
( b ) Evaluation by nongovernment evaluators;
( c ) Use (except for manufacture) by other contractors participating in the Government's program of which the specific contract is a part, for information and use in connection with the work performed under each contract;
( d ) Emergency repairs or overhaul work;
( e ) Release to a foreign government, or instrumentality thereof, as the interests of the United States Government may require, for information or evaluation, or for emergency repair or overhaul work by such government.
[55 FR 48623, Nov. 21, 1990]
13.303-1 General. ( a ) A blanket purchase agreement (BPA) is a simplified method of filling anticipated repetitive needs for supplies or services by establishing “charge accounts” with qualified sources of supply (see subpart 16.7 for additional coverage of agreements).
( b ) BPAs should be established for use by an organization responsible for providing supplies for its own operations or for other offices, installations, projects, or functions. Such organizations, for example, may be organized supply points, separate independent or detached field parties, or one-person posts or activities.
( c ) The use of BPAs does not exempt an agency from the responsibility for keeping obligations and expenditures within available funds.
#### 1329.303 Application of State and local taxes to government contractors and subcontractors.

The designee authorized to review a proposed designation of a contractor as an agent of the Government is set forth in CAM 1301.70.
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 626 

To require Senate confirmation of the Inspector General of the Bureau 

of Consumer Financial Protection, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 14, 2017 

Mr. PORTMAN (for himself, Mr. ENZI, Mr. HELLER, Mr. ISAKSON, Mr. BARRASSO, Mr. HOEVEN, Ms. COLLINS, Mr. BLUNT, Mr. BOOZMAN, and Mr. 

COCHRAN) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs 

A BILL 

To require Senate confirmation of the Inspector General 

of the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Bureau of Consumer 

5 Financial Protection-Inspector General Reform Act of 

6 2017’’ or the ‘‘CFPB-IG Act of 2017’’. 

7 SEC. 2. APPOINTMENT OF INSPECTOR GENERAL. 

8 The Inspector General Act of 1978 (5 U.S.C. App.) 

9 is amended— 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 626 IS

1 (1) in section 8G— 

2 (A) in subsection (a)(2), by striking ‘‘and 

3 the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection’’; 

4 (B) in subsection (c), by striking ‘‘For the 

5 purposes of implementing this section’’ and all 

6 that follows through the end of the subsection; 

7 and 

8 (C) in subsection (g)(3), by striking ‘‘and 

9 the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection’’; 

10 and 

11 (2) in section 12— 

12 (A) in paragraph (1), by inserting ‘‘the Di13 rector of the Bureau of Consumer Financial 

14 Protection;’’ after ‘‘the President of the Export15 Import Bank;’’; and 

16 (B) in paragraph (2), by inserting ‘‘the 

17 Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection,’’ 

18 after ‘‘the Export-Import Bank,’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS