Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 9 / Thursday, January 14, 2021 / Notices 3115 

budgets must not exceed $1.5 million, 

including contract support costs. 

V. Proposal Template 

The following proposal template is 

provided for the convenience of 

applicants. The use of this template is 

recommended but not mandatory. A 

proposal will be accepted for review as 

long as it meets all the applicable 

criteria in this notice. Email completed 

proposals to FDPIR-RC@usda.gov with 

subject line ‘‘FDPIR Demonstration 

Project’’. Proposals will be accepted 

until 11:59 p.m. ET on March 15, 2021. 

A. Tribal Organization Information 

Please provide the following 

information: 

1. Full name, address, and telephone 

number of Tribal Organization 

proposing to contract. 

2. Full name, address, telephone 

number, and email of Tribal 

Organization’s main contact for this 

proposal. 

3. A copy of signed Federal-State 

Agreement (FNS–74) with FNS or of 

signed agreement with the FDPIR State 

agency. 

4. A copy of current FDPIR Plan of 

Operation. 

5. A copy of most recent FNS FDPIR 

management evaluation within the last 

three (3) years or, if the management 

evaluation is not available, copy of most 

recent Tribal audit report. 

6. A Tribal Resolution from the Tribal 

Council authorizing the Tribal 

Organization to participate in this 

demonstration project or a statement 

affirming that a Tribal Resolution with 

this authorization has been requested of 

the Tribal Council and will be 

submitted prior to contract negotiations 

and within 30 days, if selected. 

7. A detailed description of Tribal 

Organization’s capacity to purchase the 

proposed food(s) for its FDPIR program. 

B. Agricultural Commodity Procurement 

Please provide the following 

information: 

1. Identification of food(s) from the 

current FDPIR food package the Tribal 

Organization intends to supplant (i.e., 

replace). 

2. A detailed description of food(s) 

proposed for purchase and inclusion in 

the FDPIR program by Tribal 

Organization. Specifically, the following 

information must be included: 

a. An attestation that the proposed 

food(s) is a product grown, processed, 

and otherwise prepared for sale or 

distribution exclusively in the United 

States. See also #5 of this proposal 

template. 

b. A description of the nutritional 

value of the proposed food(s) and 

explanation of how the proposed food(s) 

is of similar or higher nutritional value 

than the food(s) being supplanted. 

Alternately, Tribal Organizations may 

describe how the proposed food(s) is 

nutritionally similar to the items in the 

FDPIR food package category of the food 

it is replacing rather than drawing a 

direct nutritional comparison to the 

specific food being supplanted. For 

example: 

D If a Tribal Organization proposes to 

supplant frozen blueberries in the 

FDPIR food package fruit category 

(Exhibit O) with a berry traditional to its 

culture, the Tribal Organization may 

explain how the traditional berry is 

nutritionally similar to other fruits 

currently offered in the fruit category. A 

comparison of the specific nutrients in 

frozen blueberries compared to the 

traditional berry is not required. 

c. A description of Tribal 

Organization’s capacity to obtain the 

proposed food(s) in a quantity that 

meets estimated participant demand. In 

the description, Tribal Organization 

must confirm proposed food(s) will be 

offered to all FDPIR participants served 

by its program. 

d. The estimated number of months 

the proposed food(s) will be distributed 

to Tribal Organization’s existing FDPIR 

caseload. A minimum six-month 

distribution is required (consecutive or 

non-consecutive). 

e. Documentation that the proposed 

food(s) is commercially available (i.e., 

presently being sold to the public 

through commercial channels by the 

vendor(s) from which the Tribal 

Organization is proposing to procure the 

food(s)). See also #5 of this proposal 

template. 

3. A proposed budget and narrative of 

estimated costs. Budget proposal, 

including all contract support costs, 

may not exceed $1.5 million. The 

proposed budget must include the 

following: 

a. The total amount of funds 

requested. 

b. A budget narrative that describes 

all major line-item expenditures that are 

proposed. 

c. A breakout of the amount of funds 

requested by the following categories: 

D Food purchases 

D Personnel 

D Equipment 

D Materials and supplies 

D Travel 

D Other allowable costs 

d. An estimate and description of all 

contract support costs. 

4. A proposed period of performance 

to perform contract activities. 

5. Letter(s) of Support from vendor(s) 

which will supply the food(s). Letter(s) 

should certify that vendor(s): 

D Sells food(s) commercially; and 

D Offers food(s) that is a product 

grown, processed, and otherwise 

prepared for sale or distribution 

exclusively in the United States. 

Pamilyn Miller, 

Administrator, Food and Nutrition Service. 

[FR Doc. 2021–00529 Filed 1–13–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3410–30–P 

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

Forest Service 

Newspapers Used for Publication of 

Legal Notices by the Pacific Northwest 

Region; Oregon, Washington, and 

Parts of California 

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: This notice lists the 

newspapers that will be used by the 

Ranger Districts, Forests and Regional 

Office of the Pacific Northwest Region 

to publish legal notices required under 

Agency regulations. The intended effect 

of this action is to inform interested 

members of the public which 

newspapers the Forest Service will use 

to publish notices of proposed actions 

and notices of decision. This will 

provide the public with constructive 

notice of Forest Service proposals and 

decisions, provide information on the 

procedures to comment, object, or 

appeal, and establish the date that the 

Forest Service will use to determine if 

comments, appeals, or objection were 

timely. 

DATES: Publication of legal notices in 

the listed newspapers begins on the date 

of this publication. This list of 

newspapers will remain in effect until a 

new list is published in the Federal 

Register. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sue 

Dixon, Regional Environmental 

Coordinator, Pacific Northwest Region, 

1220 Southwest Third Avenue, 

Portland, OR 97204 and by phone at 

(503) 808–2276 or by email at 

sue.dixon@usda.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

administrative procedures at 36 CFR 

218, and 219 require the Forest Service 

to publish notices in a newspaper of 

general circulation. The content of the 

notices is specified in 36 CFR 218 and 

219. In general, the notices will identify: 

The decision or project by title or 

subject matter; the name and title of the 

official making the decision; how to 

obtain additional information; and 

where and how to file comments or 

appeals/objection. The date the notice is 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
3116 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 9 / Thursday, January 14, 2021 / Notices 

published will be used to establish the 

official date for the beginning of the 

comment, appeal, or objection period. 

Pacific Northwest Regional Office 

Regional Forester 

Notices for Comment and Decisions 

and Objections affecting Oregon 

Forests:-‘‘The Oregonian’’, Portland, 

Oregon, for National Forest System 

Lands in the State of Oregon for any 

projects of Region-wide impact, or for 

any projects affecting more than one 

National Forest or National Grassland in 

Oregon. 

Notices for Comment and Decisions 

and Objections affecting Washington 

Forests:—‘‘The Seattle Times’’, Seattle, 

Washington, for National Forest System 

Lands in the State of Washington for 

any projects of Region-wide impact, or 

for any projects affecting more than one 

National Forest or National Grassland in 

Washington. 

Columbia River Gorge National Scenic 

Area 

Notices for Comment and Decisions 

and Objections by the Area Manager/ 

Forest Supervisor are published in:— 

‘‘Hood River News’’, Hood River, 

Oregon. 

Oregon National Forests and Grassland 

Deschutes National Forest 

Notices for Comments, Decisions, and 

Objections by Forest Supervisor, Bend/ 

Fort Rock District Ranger, Crescent 

District Ranger, Redmond Air Center 

Manager, and Sisters District Ranger are 

published in:—‘‘The Bulletin’’, Bend, 

Oregon. 

Fremont-Winema National Forests 

Notices for Comments, Decisions, and 

Objections by Forest Supervisor, Bly 

District Ranger, Lakeview District 

Ranger, Paisley District Ranger, Silver 

Lake District Ranger, Chemult District 

Ranger, Chiloquin District Ranger, 

Klamath District Ranger, are published 

in:—‘‘Herald and News’’, Klamath Falls, 

Oregon. 

Malheur National Forest 

Notices for Comments, Decisions, and 

Objections by Forest Supervisor, Blue 

Mountain District Ranger, Prairie City 

District Ranger, are published in:-‘‘Blue 

Mountain Eagle’’, John Day, Oregon. 

Notices for Comments, Decisions, and 

Objections by Emigrant Creek District 

Ranger are published in:—‘‘Burns Times 

Herald’’, Burns, Oregon. 

Mt. Hood National Forest 

Notices for Comments, Decisions, and 

Objections by Forest Supervisor, 

Clackamas River District Ranger, Zigzag 

District Ranger, Hood River District 

Ranger, Barlow District Ranger, are 

published in:—‘‘The Oregonian’’, 

Portland, Oregon. 

Ochoco National Forest and Crooked 

River National Grassland 

Notices for Comments, Decisions, and 

Objections by Forest Supervisor, 

Crooked River National Grassland Area 

Manager, Lookout Mountain District 

Ranger, Paulina District Ranger, are 

published in:—‘‘The Bulletin’’, Bend, 

Oregon. 

Rogue River-Siskiyou National Forests 

Notices for Comments, Decisions, and 

Objections by Forest Supervisor, High 

Cascades District Ranger, J. Herbert 

Stone Nursery Manager, Siskiyou 

Mountains District Ranger, are 

published in:—‘‘Mail Tribune’’, 

Medford, Oregon. 

Notices for Comments, Decisions, and 

Objections by Wild Rivers District 

Ranger are published in:-‘‘Grants Pass 

Daily Courier’’, Grants Pass, Oregon. 

Notices for Comments, Decisions, and 

Objections by Gold Beach District 

Ranger are published in:—‘‘Curry 

County Reporter’’, Gold Beach, Oregon. 

Notices for Comments, Decisions, and 

Objections by Powers District Ranger are 

published in:—‘‘The World’’, Coos Bay, 

Oregon. 

Siuslaw National Forest 

Notices for Comments, Decisions, and 

Objections by Forest Supervisor are 

published in:—‘‘Corvallis GazetteTimes’’, Corvallis, Oregon. 

Notices for Comments, Decisions, and 

Objections by Central Coast Ranger— 

Oregon Dunes National Recreation Area 

District Ranger are published in:—‘‘The 

Register-Guard’’, Eugene, Oregon. 

Notices for Comments, Decisions, and 

Objections by Hebo District Ranger are 

published in:—‘‘Tillamook Headlight 

Herald’’, Tillamook, Oregon. 

Umatilla National Forest 

Notices for Comments, Decisions, and 

Objections by Forest Supervisor, North 

Fork John Day District Ranger, Heppner 

District Ranger, Pomeroy District 

Ranger, Walla Walla District Ranger, are 

published in:—‘‘East Oregonian’’, 

Pendleton, Oregon. 

Umpqua National Forest 

Notices for Comments, Decisions, and 

Objections by Forest Supervisor, Cottage 

Grove District Ranger, Diamond Lake 

District Ranger, North Umpqua District 

Ranger, Tiller District Ranger, Dorena 

Genetic Resource Center Manager, are 

published in:—‘‘The News-Review’’, 

Roseburg, Oregon. 

Wallowa-Whitman National Forest 

Notices for Comments, Decisions, and 

Objections by Forest Supervisor, 

Whitman District Ranger, are published 

in:—‘‘Baker City Herald’’, Baker City, 

Oregon 

Notices for Comments, Decisions, and 

Objections by La Grande District Ranger 

are published in:—‘‘The Observer’’, La 

Grande, Oregon. 

Notices for Comments, Decisions, and 

Objections by Hells Canyon National 

Recreation Area Manager, Eagle Cap 

District Ranger, Wallowa Valley District 

Ranger, are published in:—‘‘Wallowa 

County Chieftain’’, Enterprise, Oregon. 

Willamette National Forest 

Notices for Comments, Decisions, and 

Objections by Forest Supervisor, Middle 

Fork District Ranger, McKenzie River 

District Ranger, Sweet Home District 

Ranger, are published in:—‘‘The 

Register-Guard’’, Eugene, Oregon. 

Notices for Comments, Decisions, and 

Objections by Detroit District Ranger are 

published in:—‘‘Statesman Journal’’, 

Salem, Oregon. 

Washington National Forests 

Colville National Forest 

Notices for Comments, Decisions, and 

Objections by Forest Supervisor, Three 

Rivers District Ranger, are published 

in:—‘‘Statesman-Examiner’’, Colville, 

Washington. 

Notices for Comments, Decisions, and 

Objections by Sullivan Lake District 

Ranger, Newport District Ranger, are 

published in:—‘‘The Newport Miner’’, 

Newport, Washington. 

Notices for Comments, Decisions, and 

Objections by Republic District Ranger 

are published in:—‘‘Ferry County 

View’’, Republic, Washington. 

Gifford Pinchot National Forest 

Notices for Comments, Decisions, and 

Objections by Forest Supervisor, Mount 

Adams District Ranger, Mount St. 

Helens National Volcanic Monument 

Manager, are published in:—‘‘The 

Columbian’’, Vancouver, Washington. 

Notices for Comments, Decisions, and 

Objections by Cowlitz Valley District 

Ranger are published in: —.’’The 

Chronicle’’, Chehalis, Washington. 

Mt. Baker-Snoqualmie National Forest 

Notices for Comments, Decisions, and 

Objections by Forest Supervisor, 

Darrington District Ranger, Skykomish 

District Ranger, are published in:— 

‘‘Everett Herald’’, Everett, Washington. 

Notices for Comments, Decisions, and 

Objections by Mt. Baker District Ranger 

are published in:—‘‘Skagit Valley 

Herald’’, Mt. Vernon, Washington 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 9 / Thursday, January 14, 2021 / Notices 3117 

(south half of the district); ‘‘Bellingham 

Herald’’, Bellingham, Washington 

(north half of the district). 

Notices for Comments, Decisions, and 

Objections by Snoqualmie District 

Ranger are published in:—‘‘Snoqualmie 

Valley Record’’, North Bend, 

Washington (north half of district); 

‘‘Enumclaw Courier Herald’’, 

Enumclaw, Washington (south half of 

district). 

Okanogon-Wenatchee National Forests 

Notices for Comments, Decisions, and 

Objections by Forest Supervisor, Chelan 

District Ranger, Entiat District Ranger, 

Tonasket District Ranger, Wenatchee 

River District Ranger, are published 

in:—‘‘The Wenatchee World’’, 

Wenatchee, Washington. 

Notices for Comments, Decisions, and 

Objections by Naches District Ranger are 

published in:—‘‘Yakima Herald’’, 

Yakima, Washington. 

Notices for Comments, Decisions, and 

Objections by Methow Valley District 

Ranger are published in:—‘‘Methow 

Valley News’’, Twisp, Washington. 

Notices for Comments, Decisions, and 

Objections by Cle Elum District Ranger 

are published in:—‘‘Ellensburg Daily 

Record’’, Ellensburg, Washington. 

Olympic National Forest 

Notices for Comments, Decisions, and 

Objections by Forest Supervisor are 

published in:—‘‘The Olympian’’, 

Olympia, Washington. 

Notices for Comments, Decisions, and 

Objections by Hood Canal District 

Ranger are published in:—‘‘Peninsula 

Daily News’’, Port Angeles, Washington. 

Notices for Comments, Decisions, and 

Objections by Pacific District Ranger are 

published in:—‘‘The Daily World’’, 

Aberdeen, Washington (south portion of 

district); ‘‘Peninsula Daily News’’, Port 

Angeles, Washington (north portion of 

district). 

Christine Dawe, 

Acting Associate Deputy Chief, National 

Forest System. 

[FR Doc. 2021–00724 Filed 1–13–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3411–15–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

Foreign-Trade Zones Board 

[B–1–2021] 

Foreign-Trade Zone 114—Peoria, 

Illinois; Application for Reorganization 

under Alternative Site Framework 

An application has been submitted to 

the Foreign-Trade Zones (FTZ) Board by 

the Economic Development Council, 

Inc., grantee of FTZ 114, requesting 

authority to reorganize the zone under 

the alternative site framework (ASF) 

adopted by the FTZ Board (15 CFR Sec. 

400.2(c)). The ASF is an option for 

grantees for the establishment or 

reorganization of zones and can permit 

significantly greater flexibility in the 

designation of new subzones or ‘‘usagedriven’’ FTZ sites for operators/users 

located within a grantee’s ‘‘service area’’ 

in the context of the FTZ Board’s 

standard 2,000-acre activation limit for 

a zone. The application was submitted 

pursuant to the Foreign-Trade Zones 

Act, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), 

and the regulations of the Board (15 CFR 

part 400). It was formally docketed on 

January 8, 2021. 

FTZ 114 was approved by the FTZ 

Board on December 21, 1984 (Board 

Order 288, 50 FR 1606, January 11, 

1985) and expanded on October 16, 

2009 (Board Order 1647, 74 FR 55813, 

October 29, 2009). 

The current zone includes the 

following sites: Site 1 (88 acres)—Peoria 

Barge Terminal, Inc., 1925 Darst St., 

Peoria; Site 2 (150 acres)—United 

Facilities, Inc., 603 N. Main St., East 

Peoria; Site 4 (2 acres)—CDO 

Distribution, Inc., 5703 Smithville Rd., 

Bartonville; Site 5 (37 acres)—KMI 

Sales, Inc., 278 Koch St., Pekin; Site 6 

(17 acres)—Export Packaging Company, 

6409 West Smithville Rd., Bartonville; 

Site 7 (360 acres)—Rantoul Airport, 601 

S. Century Boulevard, Rantoul; Site 8 

(333 acres)—Logistics Park Galesburg, 

659 Knox Road, Galesburg; and, Site 9 

(3 acres)—HK Logistics, 2314 East 

Wilkins Dr., Mossville. 

The grantee’s proposed service area 

under the ASF would be Peoria, Cass, 

Champaign, Dewitt, Ford, Fulton, Knox, 

Livingston, Logan, Macon, Marshall, 

Mason, McDonough, McLean, 

Menard, Piatt, Putnam, Sangamon, 

Schuyler, Stark, Tazewell, Woodford 

and portions of Bureau and LaSalle 

Counties, Illinois, as described in the 

application. If approved, the grantee 

would be able to serve sites throughout 

the service area based on companies’ 

needs for FTZ designation. The 

application indicates that the proposed 

service area is within and adjacent to 

the Peoria Customs and Border 

Protection port of entry. 

The applicant is requesting authority 

to reorganize its zone to include existing 

Sites 7 and 8 as ‘‘magnet’’ sites and 

existing Sites 1, 2, 4, 5 and 6 as ‘‘usagedriven’’ sites. The applicant is 

proposing that existing Site 9 be 

removed from the zone. The applicant is 

also requesting approval of a subzone 

for Rivian Automotive, LLC at the 

following sites: Proposed Site 1 (528 

acres)—110 N. Rivian Motorway, 

Normal, McLean County; Proposed Site 

2 (16 acres)—2601 W. College Avenue, 

Normal, McLean County; and, Proposed 

Site 3 (65.6 acres)—301 W. Kerrick 

Road, Normal, McLean County. The 

application would have no impact on 

FTZ 114’s previously authorized 

subzones. 

In accordance with the FTZ Board’s 

regulations, Elizabeth Whiteman of the 

FTZ Staff is designated examiner to 

evaluate and analyze the facts and 

information presented in the application 

and case record and to report findings 

and recommendations to the FTZ Board. 

Public comment is invited from 

interested parties. Submissions shall be 

addressed to the FTZ Board’s Executive 

Secretary and sent to: ftz@trade.gov. The 

closing period for their receipt is March 

15, 2021. Rebuttal comments in 

response to material submitted during 

the foregoing period may be submitted 

during the subsequent 15-day period to 

March 30, 2021. 

A copy of the application will be 

available for public inspection in the 

‘‘Reading Room’’ section of the FTZ 

Board’s website, which is accessible via 

www.trade.gov/ftz. For further 

information, contact Elizabeth 

Whiteman at Elizabeth.Whiteman@

trade.gov. 

Dated: January 8, 2021. 

Andrew McGilvray, 

Executive Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2021–00713 Filed 1–13–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

Bureau of Industry and Security 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities; Submission to the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) for 

Review and Approval; Comment 

Request; Request for Appointment of a 

Technical Advisory Committee 

AGENCY: Bureau of Industry and 

Security, Commerce. 

ACTION: Notice of information collection, 

request for comment. 

SUMMARY: The Department of 

Commerce, in accordance with the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 

(PRA), invites the general public and 

other Federal agencies to comment on 

proposed, and continuing information 

collections, which helps us assess the 

impact of our information collection 

requirements and minimize the public’s 

reporting burden. The purpose of this 

notice is to allow for 60 days of public 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES