alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §1377. Collection of data on detained asylum seekers

#### (a) In general

The Attorney General shall regularly collect data on a nation-wide 1 basis with respect to asylum seekers in detention in the United States, including the following information:

(1) The number of detainees.

(2) An identification of the countries of origin of the detainees.

(3) The percentage of each gender within the total number of detainees.

(4) The number of detainees listed by each year of age of the detainees.

(5) The location of each detainee by detention facility.

(6) With respect to each facility where detainees are held, whether the facility is also used to detain criminals and whether any of the detainees are held in the same cells as criminals.

(7) The number and frequency of the transfers of detainees between detention facilities.

(8) The average length of detention and the number of detainees by category of the length of detention.

(9) The rate of release from detention of detainees for each district of the Immigration and Naturalization Service.

(10) A description of the disposition of cases.

#### (b) Annual reports

Beginning October 1, 1999, and not later than October 1 of each year thereafter, the Attorney General shall submit to the Committee on the Judiciary of each House of Congress a report setting forth the data collected under subsection (a) for the fiscal year ending September 30 of that year.

#### (c) Availability to public

Copies of the data collected under subsection (a) shall be made available to members of the public upon request pursuant to such regulations as the Attorney General shall prescribe.

(Pub. L. 105–277, div. A, §101(h) [title IX, §903], Oct. 21, 1998, 112 Stat. 2681–480, 2681–541.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Haitian Refugee Immigration Fairness Act of 1998, and also as part of the Treasury and General Government Appropriations Act, 1999, and the Omnibus Consolidated and Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Act, 1999, and not as part of the Immigration and Nationality Act which comprises this chapter.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Abolition of Immigration and Naturalization Service and Transfer of Functions

For abolition of Immigration and Naturalization Service, transfer of functions, and treatment of related references, see note set out under section 1551 of this title.

1 So in original. Probably should be "nationwide".
#### Herbert Levine et al., Respondents, v Marion Fine et al., Appellants, et al., Defendant. Marion Fine et al., Petitioners, v Herbert Levine et al., Respondents.

— Appeal by defendants Fine, Katzman and Weinstein from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated October 3, 1977, as disqualified attorney Leo Katzman from representing any of the parties to this litigation. Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, with $50 costs and disbursements. Appellants erroneously contend that there is no proper record upon which to base a review of the trial court’s determination disqualifying attorney Leo Katzman from representing any of the parties to the instant litigation. On the contrary, the facts upon which the trial court relied were set out at length in the record. In the circumstances presented, the court’s determination was not an abuse of discretion. Mollen, P. J., Suozzi, Rabin and Martuscello, JJ., concur.
# 18pbapt
Fiscal Year 2018 Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies - PUERTO RICO

FY 2018 Title I

LEA ID District Allocation*

4300030 Puerto Rico 396,257,109

4399999 PART D SUBPART 2 0

* Actual amounts received by LEAs will be smaller than shown here due to State-level adjustments to Federal Title I allocations. States adjust

 allocations, for example, to reflect LEA boundary changes or the creation of new LEAs, including charter school LEAs, that are not accounted

 for in the statutory calculations. States also are permitted to reserve, for administration, up to 1 percent of the allocations they would receive

 if $14 billion were appropriated and generally must reserve 7 percent of their allocations for school improvement. These 

 adjustments will reduce the actual amounts available.
#### In the Matter of Otto W. Winter, Appellant, v. William S. Hults, as Commissioner of Motor Vehicles, Respondent.

Motion to vacate order dismissing appeal denied.
Order entered October 16, 2017

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-17-01169-CV

No. 05-17-01170-CV

IN RE SENRICK SHERN WILKERSON, Relator

Original Proceeding from the Criminal District Court No. 3

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. F10-01183 and F10-01184

ORDER

Before Justices Lang, Brown, and Stoddart

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS relator’s October 2, 2017 

“petition for nunc pro tunc and order” for want of jurisdiction.

/s/ CRAIG STODDART 

JUSTICE
Exhibit 99.2




                  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Energy Conversion Devices, Inc. (the "Company") Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Stephan
W. Zumsteg, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge,

        1.     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

        2.     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Company.


Date:   May 15, 2003                   By:  /s/ Stephan W. Zumsteg
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 Stephan W. Zumsteg
                                                 Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>

                                  CERTIFICATE AS TO
                                 CORPORATE RESOLUTION
                                          OF
                           POLYDEX PHARMACEUTICALS LIMITED

                              REGISTRATION NO.: 24,178 

     I, Sharon L. Wardlaw, Secretary of Polydex Pharmaceuticals Limited, DO
HEREBY CERTIFY that the following is a true and correct copy of Resolutions
passed by a majority vote of the Shareholders of Polydex Pharmaceuticals Limited
(the "Company") at a meeting held on the 19th day of June, 1998:

     RESOLVED: 

     1.   That the present Article 2 of the Articles of Association of the
          Company be amended by relettering subsections (d) and (e) to read as
          subsection (e) and (f), respectfully, and adding the following new
          Article 2 subsection (d):

          SHARE CAPITAL:

          2. (d) The Class B Preferred Shares shall have the following rights
          and characteristics, that is:

               1    The Class B Preferred Shares shall bestow upon the holders
                    thereof no rights in respective dividends, shall bestow no
                    rights in respect of convertibility into any other class of
                    shares and, in winding up of the corporation, shall rank
                    behind both the Class A Preferred Shares and the Common
                    Shares;

               2    The Class B Preferred Shares shall bestow upon the holders
                    the right of one vote per share, which may be increased to
                    five votes per share upon the consent of the majority of the
                    holders of the Common Shares and the Class B Preferred
                    Shares.

     2.   That Article 33 of the Articles of Association of the Company be
          amended by deleting the second sentence of Article 33 in its entirety
          and substituting therefore the following new second sentence of
          Article 33:

          Except as maybe otherwise required by law, a quorum for the
          transaction of business at any general meeting of the members shall be
          members present wholly or represented by proxy between them not less
          than one-third (1/3) of all Common Shares which are issued at the date
          not more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the meeting fixed
          as a record date by the directors and which entitle the holder thereof
          to vote.

Dated the 20th day of June, 1998.

POLYDEX PHARMACEUTICALS LIMITED 

/s/ Sharon L. Wardlaw          
--------------------------------
Sharon L. Wardlaw, Secretary
••['ARTMENTO F ;-'^N'S-ORWiO N Marc h 28 . 201 2 ' . uhui-.^ - •:••-. : 1 -i Q T,- , o "; - "5 s Mr . Denni s J , DeVan yi;; ^ n.r t . U = J

- 3 ^ Chief , Essentia l Ai rServic e Divisio n X-5 3 Unite d State s Departmen t o fTransportatio n Offic e o fAviatio n Analysi s 120 0 Ne wJerse yAvenue , S E Washington , D C 2059 0 RE : OST-2002-1144 6 OST-2002-1145 1 Dea rMr . DeVany : Thi s i s i n referenc e t o th e above-nnentione d docket s regardin g th e Essentia l Ai rServic e (EAS ) Progra m fo rth e Altoona-Blai rCount yan d th e Johnstown-Cambri a Count y Airports . I a m i n receip t o fth e "Orde rRequestin g Proposals" , th e Silve rAirway s proposa l t o provid e subsidize d ai rservic e t o th e airports , an d th e "Orde rProhibitin g Suspensio n o fService" . Th e proposa l submitte d b ySilve rAirway s propose s t o operat e flight s unde rit s existin g Unite d Airline s codeshar e wit h th e Saa b 340B-+ - aircraf t utilizin g th e Washingto n Dulle s Internationa l Airport . Sinc e servic e commence d t o IA D i n February2008 , th e airport ha s see n positiv e improvement s i n enplanemen t numbers . Th e respons e fro m bot h th e Blai rCountyloca l busines s communit yan d th e leisur e passenger s ha s als o bee n ver y positiv e an d encouraging . Th e continuatio n o freliabl e custome rfriendl ycabi n clas s ai rservic e wil l allo wfo rth e continue d economi cgrowt h an d developmen t i n ou rregion . W e loo k forwar d t o a mutuall ybeneficia l partnershi p betwee n th e airport an d Silve r Airways . I t i s fo rthes e reason s tha t I full ysupport th e Silve rAirway s proposa l t o provid e continue d Essentia l Ai rServic e i n th e respectiv e markets . Than k yo u i n advanc e fo ryou rcontinue d support o f th e Altoona-Blai rCount yAirport an d shoul d yo u hav e an yquestion s regardin g thi s matter , fee l fre e t o contac t m e directly .

l^illar , J^ , CM. / Airport Manage r Cc : BCAA
**Exhibit
      32**





**Certification
      of**


**Chief
      Executive Officer**


**and
      Chief Financial Officer**


**Securities
      Exchange Act rules 13(a) and 15(d)**


**As
      Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002**








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Metwood, Inc. ("the
      Company") for the three months ended September 30, 2006, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof ("the Report"), each
      of
      the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
      Company certifies, to the best knowledge and belief of the signatory, pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
      financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date:
      November 11, 2006




/s/
      Robert M. Callahan


Robert
      M.
      Callahan


Chief
      Executive Officer








Date:
      November 11, 2006




/s/
      Shawn A. Callahan


Shawn
      A.
      Callahan


Chief
      Financial Officer
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL

TO: The Alternate Designated Agency Ethics Official

FROM: The Designated Agency Ethics Official Delegation of 

SUBJECT: Delegation of Authority

I. DELEGATION

Under the authority vested in me by the Delegation of Authority from the 

Secretary dated October 5, 1992 (Delegation Control No. EA/EGB/56), I hereby 

delegate to you the authority to implement the financial disclosure systems 

required under 5 C.F.R. Part 2634, including, but not limited to, the authority to:

(a) determine the positions for officers and employees, including special 

government employees, that are subject to the requirements for filing 

confidential financial disclosure reports (5 C.F.R. §§ 2634.904-905) or 

subject to the requirements for filing public financial disclosure reports (5 

C.F.R. §§ 202-204);

(b) review and certify reports submitted to the Department in accordance with 

internal agency procedures (5 C.F.R. § 2634.605);

(c) determine appropriate remedial action necessary after a determination that 

a conflict, or the appearance of a conflict, exists between an employee's 

interests and the performance of the employee's service for the 

Government (5 C.F.R. § 2634.605(b)(5)); and

(d) review and make initial determinations relating to any complaint filed by 

an individual that his or her position has been improperly determined to be 

one which requires the submission of a confidential financial disclosure 

report (5 C.F.R. § 2634.906).

This authority must be exercised in accordance with the Ethics in Government 

Act, Public Law 95-521, as amended; by Executive Order 12674 of April 12, 

1989, as modified by Executive Order 12731 of October 17, 1990.
Unless otherwise noted in future delegations of authority, amendments to the 

existing authorities delegated herein are included within the scope of this 

delegation.

II. REDELEGATION

Subject to the reservations listed below, this authority may be redelegated to 

Deputy Designated Agency Ethics Officials. No other redelegation is permitted.

III. RESERVATIONS

The following authority is reserved to the Designated Agency Ethics Official:

a) The authority to make final determinations under 5 C.F.R. § 2634.906; and

b) The authority to certify nominee reports filed by individuals who are 

nominated by the President for appointment to a position that requires the 

advice and consent of the Senate, except that the Alternate Designated 

Agency Ethics Official may certify such reports in the absence of the 

Designated Agency Ethics Official pursuant to 5 C.F.R. § 2638.203. 5 

C.F.R. § 2634.605(a).

IV. CERTIFICATION AND EFFECTIVE DATE

This delegation is effective upon certification by the Department's Principal 

Delegation Control Officer.

This delegation supersedes the Delegation of Authority from the Designated 

Agency Ethics Official dated November 9, 1992 (Delegation Control No. 

EGB/EGB/57).

 /s_____________

Steven Y. Winnick

OGC Clearance and Date: /s/ R. Wexler

Certified Date: 12/8/1992

Departmental Delegations Control Officer: /s/ Wilma J. Hodo

Control No. EGB/EGB/58
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 17 

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to require the Speaker 

to allow the Cable-Satellite Public Affairs Network (C–SPAN) to broadcast and record the floor proceedings of the House, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 10, 2023 

Mr. GAETZ submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Rules 

RESOLUTION 

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to 

require the Speaker to allow the Cable-Satellite Public 

Affairs Network (C–SPAN) to broadcast and record the 

floor proceedings of the House, and for other purposes. 

1 Resolved, 

2 SECTION 1. BROADCASTING THE HOUSE. 

3 Rule V of the Rules of the House of Representatives 

4 is amended— 

5 (1) by redesignating clause 3 as clause 4; and 

6 (2) by inserting after clause 2 the following new 

7 clause: 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 17 IH 

1 ‘‘3. The Speaker must allow the Cable-Satellite Pub2 lic Affairs Network (C–SPAN) to broadcast and record 

3 the floor proceedings of the House with not less than 4 

4 cameras owned and operated by C–SPAN.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
### §105. Repealed. June 27, 1952, ch. 477, title IV, §403(a)(13), 66 Stat. 279, eff. Dec. 24, 1952

Section, act Feb. 5, 1917, ch. 29, §30, 39 Stat. 895, related to division of information.
### §305. Relationship between the Inter-American Convention and the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards of June 10, 1958

When the requirements for application of both the Inter-American Convention and the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards of June 10, 1958, are met, determination as to which Convention applies shall, unless otherwise expressly agreed, be made as follows:

(1) If a majority of the parties to the arbitration agreement are citizens of a State or States that have ratified or acceded to the Inter-American Convention and are member States of the Organization of American States, the Inter-American Convention shall apply.

(2) In all other cases the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards of June 10, 1958, shall apply.

(Added Pub. L. 101–369, §1, Aug. 15, 1990, 104 Stat. 449.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective upon the entry into force of the Inter-American Convention on International Commercial Arbitration of January 30, 1975, with respect to the United States (Oct. 27, 1990), see section 3 of Pub. L. 101–369, set out as a note under section 301 of this title.
#### Holson Company *v.*A. Earl Wood, Commissioner of Transportation of the State of Connecticut

*Robert A. Slavitt,*for the appellee (plaintiff).

*Victor Feingold,*assistant attorney general, for the appellant (defendant).

Argued January 7

decided January 7, 1975

The plaintiff’s motion to dismiss the appeal from the Superior Court in Fairfield County is denied.
### §§103, 103a. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 103, acts Mar. 2, 1895, ch. 177, §1, 28 Stat. 780; Mar. 4, 1913, ch. 141, §3, 37 Stat. 737; Ex. Ord. No. 6166, §14, June 10, 1933; 1940 Reorg. Plan No. V, eff. June 14, 1940, 5 F.R. 2423, 54 Stat. 1238, which related to administration of alien contract laws, was transferred to section 342h of former Title 5, Executive Departments and Government Officers and Employees, and subsequently eliminated from the Code on enactment of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees, by Pub. L. 89–554, Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 378. See section 1103 of this title.

Section 103a, act July 9, 1947, ch. 211, title II, 61 Stat. 292, which related to reimbursement by Attorney General of certain expenses incurred by other agencies in connection with administration and enforcement of laws relating to immigration, etc., was from the Department of Justice Appropriation Act, 1948, and was not repeated in the Department of Justice Appropriation Act, 1949, act June 3, 1948, ch. 400, title II, 62 Stat. 316. Similar provisions were contained in the following prior appropriation acts:

July 5, 1946, ch. 541, title II, 60 Stat. 462.

May 21, 1945, ch. 129, title II, 59 Stat. 185.

June 28, 1944, ch. 294, title II, 58 Stat. 412.

July 1, 1943, ch. 182, title II, 57 Stat. 288.

July 2, 1942, ch. 472, title II, 56 Stat. 483.

June 28, 1941, ch. 258, title III, 55 Stat. 292.
### §7450. Suspension or termination

The Secretary shall, whenever the Secretary finds that an order or a provision of an order obstructs or does not tend to effectuate the declared policy of this subchapter, suspend or terminate the operation of the order or provision. The suspension or termination of an order shall not be considered an order within the meaning of this subchapter.

(Pub. L. 104–127, title V, §541, Apr. 4, 1996, 110 Stat. 1063.)
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 20, 2017

No. 04

- 17

- 00642

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF A.B.S., A CHILD,

From the 73rd Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2011

- CI

- 17935 Honorable David A. Canales, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

This is a restricted appeal from the trial court’s order rendered on April 4, 2017 regarding a modification of the parent

- child relationship . Appellant filed its notice of appeal on October 4, 2017 in this court, and a copy of the notice of appeal was sent by this court to the trial court on October 5, 2017. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 26.1(c ). Accordingly, the clerk’s record was due in this

court on November 6 , 2017

. See id. R. 35.1( c ). On November 8 , 2017, the Bexar County District Clerk filed a notification of late record stating that the clerk ’ s record w ould not be filed because appellant has not paid or made arrangements to pay the clerk ’ s fee to prepare the record and appellant is no t entitled to the record without paying the fee. According ly , we ordered appellant to provide written proof to this court that either (1) the clerk ’ s fee has been paid or arrangements satisfactory to the clerk have been made to pay the clerk ’ s fee; or (2) appellant is

entitled to the clerk ’ s record without prepayment of the clerk ’ s fee. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 20.1 ; id.

R. 35.3(a).

On November 17, 2017, appellant filed pro of that he had provided payment to the district clerk for preparation of the clerk’s record. Accordingly, we ORDER the Bexar County District

Clerk to file the clerk’s rec ord in this court on or before December 20, 2 017

.

We order the clerk of t his court to serve a copy of this order on the district clerk and all

counsel.

_________________________________ Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 20th day of November, 2017

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
1601.101 Purpose. ( a ) This subpart establishes chapter 16, Office of Personnel Management Federal Employees Health Benefits Acquisition Regulation, within title 48, the Federal Acquisition Regulation System, of the Code of Federal Regulations. The short title of this regulation shall be FEHBAR.
( b ) The purpose of the FEHBAR is to implement and supplement the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) specifically for acquiring and administering contracts with health insurance carriers in the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program (FEHBP).
1631.205-76 Trade, business, technical, and professional activity costs. ( a ) FEHBP participating plans, carriers, and underwriters shall seek the advance written approval of the contracting officer for allowability of all or part of the costs associated with trade, business, technical, and professional activities (FAR 31.205-43) when the allocable costs of such participation to the FEHBP will exceed $1,000 annually and when the carrier or underwriter allocates more than 50% of the membership cost of a trade, business, technical, or professional organization to the FEHBP.
( b ) When approval of costs for membership in an organization is required, the carrier or underwriter must demonstrate conclusively that membership in such an organization and participation in its activities extend beyond the contractual relationship with OPM, have a reasonable relationship to providing care and services to FEHBP enrollees, and that the organization is not engaged in activities such as those cited in FAR 31.205-22 (lobbying costs) for which costs are not allowable.