alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 19 (Tuesday, January 29, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 6088]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-01806]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

State Energy Advisory Board (STEAB)

AGENCY: Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Department of Energy.

ACTION: Notice of open teleconference.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces a teleconference call of the State 
Energy Advisory Board (STEAB). The Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. 
L. 92-463; 86 Stat. 770) requires that public notice of these meetings 
be announced in the Federal Register.

DATES: Thursday, February 21, 2013 from 3:30 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. (EST). 
To receive the call-in number and passcode, please contact the Board's 
Designated Federal Officer (DFO) at the address or phone number listed 
below.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gil Sperling, STEAB Designated Federal 
Officer, U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and 
Renewable Energy, 1000 Independence Ave. SW., Washington, DC 20585. 
Phone number is (202) 287-1644.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    Purpose of the Board: To make recommendations to the Assistant 
Secretary for the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy 
regarding goals and objectives, programmatic and administrative 
policies, and to otherwise carry out the Board's responsibilities as 
designated in the State Energy Efficiency Programs Improvement Act of 
1990 (Pub. L. 101-440).
    Tentative Agenda: Receive an update on the activities of the 
STEAB's Taskforces, review the activities of the newly formed STEAB 
Strategic Planning Subcommittee, and provide an update to the Board on 
routine business matters and other topics of interest, and begin 
discussion planning for a March 2013 meeting.
    Public Participation: The meeting is open to the public. Written 
statements may be filed with the Board either before or after the 
meeting. Members of the public who wish to make oral statements 
pertaining to agenda items should contact Gil Sperling at the address 
or telephone number listed above. Requests to make oral comments must 
be received five days prior to the meeting; reasonable provision will 
be made to include requested topic(s) on the agenda. The Chair of the 
Board is empowered to conduct the meeting in a fashion that will 
facilitate the orderly conduct of business.
    Minutes: The minutes of the meeting will be available for public 
review and copying within 60 days on the STEAB Web site at: 
www.steab.org.

    Issued at Washington, DC, on January 23, 2013.
LaTanya R. Butler,
Deputy Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2013-01806 Filed 1-28-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
```
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 583 Reported in Senate (RS)]

<DOC>

                                                        Calendar No. 75
115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 583

  To amend the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 to 
 authorize COPS grantees to use grant funds to hire veterans as career 
           law enforcement officers, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 8, 2017

 Mr. Cornyn (for himself, Ms. Klobuchar, Mr. Grassley, Mr. Blumenthal, 
Mr. Tillis, Mrs. Feinstein, Mr. Hatch, Mr. Heller, Mr. Cruz, Mr. Blunt, 
  Mr. Coons, Mr. Cotton, Ms. Heitkamp, Mr. Manchin, Mr. Sullivan, Mr. 
   Whitehouse, Mr. Donnelly, Mr. Young, Mr. Durbin, Ms. Hirono, Mrs. 
 Ernst, and Mr. Kennedy) introduced the following bill; which was read 
          twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

                              May 11, 2017

              Reported by Mr. Grassley, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 to 
 authorize COPS grantees to use grant funds to hire veterans as career 
           law enforcement officers, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``American Law Enforcement Heroes Act 
of 2017''.

SEC. 2. PRIORITIZING HIRING AND TRAINING OF VETERANS.

    Section 1701(b)(2) of title I of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe 
Streets Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 3796dd(b)(2)) is amended by inserting 
``, including by prioritizing the hiring and training of veterans (as 
defined in section 101 of title 38, United States Code)'' after 
``Nation''.
                                                        Calendar No. 75

115th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                 S. 583

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

  To amend the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 to 
 authorize COPS grantees to use grant funds to hire veterans as career 
           law enforcement officers, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                              May 11, 2017

                       Reported without amendment
```
### §7916. Planting flexibility

#### (a) Permitted crops

Subject to subsection (b), any commodity or crop may be planted on base acres on a farm.

#### (b) Limitations regarding certain commodities

#### (1) General limitation

The planting of an agricultural commodity specified in paragraph (3) shall be prohibited on base acres unless the commodity, if planted, is destroyed before harvest.

#### (2) Treatment of trees and other perennials

The planting of an agricultural commodity specified in paragraph (3) that is produced on a tree or other perennial plant shall be prohibited on base acres.

#### (3) Covered agricultural commodities

Paragraphs (1) and (2) apply to the following agricultural commodities:

(A) Fruits.

(B) Vegetables (other than lentils, mung beans, and dry peas).

(C) Wild rice.

#### (c) Exceptions

Paragraphs (1) and (2) of subsection (b) shall not limit the planting of an agricultural commodity specified in paragraph (3) of that subsection—

(1) in any region in which there is a history of double-cropping of covered commodities with agricultural commodities specified in subsection (b)(3), as determined by the Secretary, in which case the double-cropping shall be permitted;

(2) on a farm that the Secretary determines has a history of planting agricultural commodities specified in subsection (b)(3) on base acres, except that direct payments and counter-cyclical payments shall be reduced by an acre for each acre planted to such an agricultural commodity; or

(3) by the producers on a farm that the Secretary determines has an established planting history of a specific agricultural commodity specified in subsection (b)(3), except that—

(A) the quantity planted may not exceed the average annual planting history of such agricultural commodity by the producers on the farm in the 1991 through 1995 or 1998 through 2001 crop years (excluding any crop year in which no plantings were made), as determined by the Secretary; and

(B) direct payments and counter-cyclical payments shall be reduced by an acre for each acre planted to such agricultural commodity.

#### (d) Special rule for 2002 crop year

For the 2002 crop year only, if the calculation of base acres under section 7911(a) of this title results in total base acres for a farm in excess of the contract acreage (as defined in section 7202 of this title) for the farm used to calculate the fiscal year 2002 payment authorized under section 7214 of this title, paragraphs (1) and (2) of subsection (b) shall not limit the harvesting of an agricultural commodity specified in paragraph (3) of that subsection on the excess base acres, except that direct payments and counter-cyclical payments for the 2002 crop year shall be reduced by an acre for each acre of the excess base acres planted to such an agricultural commodity.

(Pub. L. 107–171, title I, §1106, May 13, 2002, 116 Stat. 153.)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

MICHAEL C. ENGLES, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) No. 12 C 70

)

SHERMAN HOSPITAL, )

)

Defendant. )

MEMORANDUM ORDER

Michael Engles (“Engles”) has just brought a personal injury

Complaint against Sherman Hospital (“Hospital”), seeking to

invoke federal jurisdiction on diversity grounds under 28 U.S.C.

§1332(a). But although Engles’ counsel has properly identified 1

the Hospital’s dual corporate citizenship under Section

1332(c)(1)(see Complaint ¶6), Complaint ¶3 speaks only of Engles’

Oklahoma residence rather than his state of citizenship.

Under such circumstances our Court of Appeals has taught in

such cases as Adams v. Catrambone, 359 F.3d 858, 861 n.3 (7th

Cir. 2004) that “when the parties allege residence but not

citizenship, the district court must dismiss the suit.” But this

Court has no desire to pursue that Draconian course, given what

would seem to be the probability that Oklahoma is Engles’ state

of citizenship as well as his residence.

Accordingly Engles is granted leave to file an appropriate

 All further references to Title 28’s provisions will 1

simply take the form “Section--.”
amendment to his Complaint (not a full-blown Amended Complaint)

on or before January 19, 2012, failing which this Court would

indeed be constrained to dismiss this action for lack of subject

matter jurisdiction. Because of the seeming likelihood that the

present flaw can be cured, this Court is contemporaneously

issuing its customary initial scheduling order.

________________________________________

Milton I. Shadur

Senior United States District Judge

Date: January 10, 2012

2
### §511s. Grading of tobacco

#### (1) In general

Not later than March 31, 2002, the Secretary of Agriculture (referred to in this section as the "Secretary") shall conduct referenda among producers of each kind of tobacco that is eligible for price support under the Agricultural Act of 1949 (7 U.S.C. 1421 et seq.) to determine whether such producers favor the mandatory grading of that kind of tobacco by the Secretary.

#### (2) Mandatory grading

#### (A) In general

If the Secretary determines that mandatory grading is favored by a majority of the producers of a kind of tobacco voting in the referendum, the Secretary is authorized and directed to ensure that the kind of tobacco is graded at the time of sale effective for the 2002 and subsequent marketing years.

#### (B) Fees

To the maximum extent practicable, the Secretary shall establish, collect, and use fees for the grading of tobacco required under this section in the same manner as user fees for the grading of tobacco sold at auction authorized under the Tobacco Inspection Act (7 U.S.C. 511 et seq.).

#### (3) Judicial review

A determination by the Secretary under this section shall not be subject to judicial review.

(Pub. L. 107–76, title VII, §759(a), Nov. 28, 2001, 115 Stat. 741.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Agricultural Act of 1949, referred to in par. (1), is act Oct. 31, 1949, ch. 792, 63 Stat. 1051, which is classified principally to chapter 35A (§1421 et seq.) of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1421 of this title and Tables.

The Tobacco Inspection Act, referred to in par. (2)(B), is act Aug. 23, 1935, ch. 623, 49 Stat. 731, which is classified generally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 511q of this title and Tables.

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2002, and not as part of The Tobacco Inspection Act which comprises this chapter.
EXHIBIT 10.2

Summary of Titan's Annual Cash Incentive Program for Executive Officers

Titan maintains an annual cash incentive compensation program for executive officers of the Company, whereby a substantial portion of total compensation is
related to overall corporate performance and the achievement of individual objectives, as determined by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. As such, a significant portion of
executive officers' compensation is "at risk".

Annual
cash incentive bonuses are paid to the chief executive officer (CEO) and each executive officer, based on Titan's corporate performance against its annual operating plan and the
achievement of personal objectives, with target cash incentive compensation ranging from 30% to 80% of base salary compensation. The Compensation Committee approves the objectives for the CEO and the
CEO proposes and the Compensation Committee reviews and approves the performance objectives for the other executive officers. The Company performance metrics are based upon the Company's achievement
of certain annual earnings per share (EPS) and cash flow thresholds established in the annual operating plan, as approved by the Board of Directors each year. The program provides that 100% of the
company performance portion of the target compensation program related to EPS and cash flow will be paid upon the achievement of those thresholds. It also provides for none of the applicable portion
of the target compensation to be paid if less than 80% of the EPS and cash flow thresholds are achieved, with a portion being earned based on linear interpolation between 80% and 100% of the
established thresholds. Additionally, for executive officers who are Senior Vice Presidents of Titan and who lead business sectors, the Company metrics also include financial performance objectives
that are specific to the performance of their sectors. Personal performance goals for all executives may include either or both financial and non-financial objectives.

In
addition to the target cash incentive available to executive officers, other than Senior Vice Presidents of Titan who lead business sectors, there is a supplemental cash bonus of up
to 15% of base salary compensation based on Titan exceeding by up to 20% of the established EPS portion of the target objective, with linear interpolation between the established target and the actual
result. Executive officers who are Senior Vice Presidents of Titan and who lead business sectors are also eligible for a supplemental cash bonus of up to 15% of base salary compensation based on their
respective sector exceeding by up to 20% of certain financial performance objectives of their sector. The Compensation Committee has the discretion to determine whether performance objectives are
satisfied and to adjust the objectives.

---



QuickLinks
#### 1317.108 Congressional notification.

Written notification to Congress shall be handled in accordance with the policies and procedures outlined in DAO 218-2.
#### 12.001 Definition.

*Subcontract,* as used in this part, includes, but is not limited to, a transfer of commercial products or commercial services between divisions, subsidiaries, or affiliates of a contractor or subcontractor.

[60 FR 48241, Sept. 18, 1995, as amended at 86 FR 61021, Nov. 4, 2021]
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

733 

KA 14-00310 

PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., PERADOTTO, DEJOSEPH, TROUTMAN, AND SCUDDER, JJ. 

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

JULIO DIAZ, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

TIMOTHY P. DONAHER, PUBLIC DEFENDER, ROCHESTER (JAMES A. HOBBS OF

COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

SANDRA DOORLEY, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ROCHESTER (NANCY GILLIGAN OF

COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Monroe County

(Joanne M. Winslow, J.), rendered November 12, 2013. The judgment

convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of course of sexual

conduct against a child in the first degree. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed. 

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him

upon his plea of guilty of course of sexual conduct against a child in

the first degree (Penal Law § 130.75 [1] [a]). As the People

correctly concede, defendant’s oral and written waivers of his right

to appeal from his conviction do not encompass his challenge to the

severity of his sentence and thus do not foreclose our review of that

challenge (see People v Maracle, 19 NY3d 925, 927-928; People v

Tomeno, 141 AD3d 1120, 1120-1121). We nevertheless conclude that the

sentence is not unduly harsh or severe.

Entered: September 30, 2016 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
#### 1239.7301 Definitions.

As used in this subpart—

*Application* means the software that resides above system software and includes applications such as database programs, word processors and spreadsheets. Application software may be bundled with system software or published alone.

*Modernization* means the conversion, rewriting or porting of a legacy system to a modern computer programming language, software libraries, protocols, or hardware platform.

*Refresh* means the periodic replacement of equipment to ensure continuing reliability of equipment and/or improved speed and capacity.

*System software* means a platform composed of operating system programs and services, including settings and preferences, file libraries and functions used for system applications. System software also includes device drivers that run basic computer hardware and peripherals.

*Upgrade* means an updated version of existing hardware, software or firmware. The purpose of an upgrade is improved and updated product features, including performance, product life, usefulness and convenience.
August 27, 2013

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

ADRIAN SIFUENTES, Appellant

NO. 14-12-00471-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

________________________________

This cause was heard on the record of court below demonstrating appellant 

no longer desires to pursue his appeal. Having considered the record the Court 

orders the appeal DISMISSED.

We further order appellant pay all costs expended in the appeal.

We further order the mandate be issued immediately.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

JOSEPH ABRUSCATO and TIMOTHY )

WILSON, on behalf of themselves and )

others similarly situated, )

) Case No. 12-cv-00322

Plaintiffs, )

)

v. ) Judge James B. Zagel

) Magistrate Judge Maria Valdez

MEDICAL BUSINESS BUREAU, LLC; )

EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC, ) 

)

Defendants. )

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT

Plaintiff Joseph Abruscato, through his attorneys, hereby informs this Court that

plaintiff Abruscato and defendant Equifax Information Services, LLC have reached a settlement on

an individual basis. Plaintiff Abruscato will file a stipulation of dismissal, dismissing his claims

against Equifax Information Services, LLC with prejudice and the claims of the members of the

putative class against Equifax Information Services, LLC without prejudice, once the settlement is

consummated.

Respectfully submitted,

s/Tara L. Goodwin

Tara L. Goodwin

Daniel A. Edelman

Cathleen M. Combs

James O. Latturner

Tara L. Goodwin

Rupali R. Shah

EDELMAN, COMBS, LATTURNER

& GOODWIN, LLC

120 S. LaSalle Street, 18th Floor

Chicago, Illinois 60603

(312) 739-4200

(312) 419-0379 (FAX)

1

Case: 1:12-cv-00322 Document #: 65 Filed: 05/30/12 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:392
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, Tara L. Goodwin, hereby certify that on May 30, 2012, I caused to be electronically

filed the foregoing with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system, which will send notice

to the following:

Nicholas D. O'Conner

noconner@hinshawlaw.com

Lewis P. Perling

lperling@kslaw.com

Barry Goheen

bgoheen@kslaw.com

Corinne C. Heggie

cheggie@hinshawlaw.com

David M. Schultz

dschultz@hinshawlaw.com

Jeremy S. Unruh

junruh@polsinelli.com

Michael D. Douglas

mdouglas@kslaw.com

Rodney Lewis

rodneylewis@polsinelli.com

s/Tara L. Goodwin

Tara L. Goodwin

2

Case: 1:12-cv-00322 Document #: 65 Filed: 05/30/12 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:393
Editorial Note on Part 842
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 842 appear at 81 FR 83688, Nov. 22, 2016.

§ 842.95 Who are proper claimants. ( a ) Citizens and inhabitants of the United States. U.S. inhabitants includes dependents of the U.S. military personnel and federal civilian employees temporarily outside the U.S. for purposes of U.S. Government service.
( b ) U.S. military personnel and civilian employees. Note: These personnel are not proper claimants for claims for personal injury or death that occurred incident to their service.
( c ) Foreign military personnel when the damage or injury occurs in the U.S. Do not pay for claims under the MCA for personal injury or death of a foreign military personnel that occurred incident to their service.
( d ) States, state agencies, counties, or municipalities, or their political subdivisions.
( e ) Subrogees of proper claimants to the extent they have paid for the claim in question.
[81 FR 83697, Nov. 22, 2016]
----- Original Message -----

From: "Chiang, Amy" [Amy.Chiang@Honeywell.com] Sent: 05/25/2010 11:54 AM MST To: Tom Land; <mcclean.brian@epa.gov>; Drusilla Hufford; Cindy Newberg Subject: Apollo Announcement

Just wanted to give you a heads up in case you didn't see it... Honeywell will begin supplying commercial quantities of a new refrigerant - HFO - 1234yf - in the fourth quarter of 2011. SUMMARY ON RELEASE: Honeywell and DuPont announced a manufacturing joint venture to produce the HFO - 1234yf refr igerant for use in automotive air conditioning systems. The new refrigerant has a lower global warming potential (GWP) of 4. Honeywell and DuPont introduced HFO - 1234yf to the automotive industry in 2007, and since then, it has undergone extensive testing for safety and efficacy by independent testing groups such as the Society of Automotive Engineers International Cooperative Research Program, in which leading automobile manufacturers participated. Attached please find a copy of the press release outl ining the manufacturing joint venture.
<PAGE>

POLYDEX  PHARMACEUTICALS LIMITED
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                    421 COMSTOCK ROAD
                                                    TORONTO, ONTARIO
                                                    CANADA M1L 2H5
                                                    TELEPHONE:  (416) 755-2231
                                                    FAX:  (416) 755-0334
                                                    WEBSITE:  www.polydex.com

                                                    BAHAMAS OFFICE:
                                                    284 BAY STREET,
                                                    NASSAU, BAHAMAS
                            AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYEE CONTRACT

To:       Mr. Thomas C. Usher
From:     Mr. George G. Usher
Date:     February 4, 1999
Subject:  Employment Contract
Number of Pages: 1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dear Sir,

Please be advised that your employment contract that commenced on February 1,
1994, expiring on January 31, 1999, has been extended, as of February 1, 1999,
for a further period of five years as agreed by the Board of Directors at our
recent meeting January 29-30, 1999.  The conditions remain the same for this
extension except that your salary will increase to US$170,000 as you have
assumed the additional position of Director, Research & Development.





Yours Sincerely,


/s/ George G. Usher                          /s/ Thomas C. Usher

George G. Usher                              Thomas C. Usher
President, CEO                               Director, R&D