alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1/4/13 page of 

POST FOCUS EXPOSURE REPORT 

 Chemical ID: P-13-0071 Reviewer: Tobias/SS 

 

 

Results Table: Dose, Concentration, and Days Exceeded Results Summary 

Exposure Scenario1 Water Landfill Stack Air Fugitive Air 

Drinking Water Fish Ingestion 

ADR LADD ADR LADD 7Q104 

CC = 1 

PDM 

Days 

Exceede

d 

LADD ADR LADD ADR LADD 

Release 

activity(ies)2; 

exposure 

calculation(s)3 

mg/kg/day mg/kg/day mg/kg/day mg/kg/day μg/l # Days mg/kg/day mg/kg/day mg/kg/day mg/kg/day mg/kg/day 

 max acute eco --- --- --- --- 5.70E-01 --- --- --- --- --- --- 

1 Exposure scenario titles consist of release activity followed by exposure calculation abbreviation. 

2 Release activities are from engineering report's Manufacturing (Mfg), Processing (Proc) and Use release 

activity labels. 

 Multiple release activities are combined in one exposure scenario if their releases occur at same location. 

3 Exposure calculations are Acute Dose Rate (ADR), Lifetime Average Daily Dose (LADD), and 

Probabilistic Dilution 

 Model (PDM). There may be one, two, or all three exposure calculations per exposure scenario. 

 CC is the aquatic concentration of concern. 

4 This column displays concentration values for the 7Q10 streamflow, which is defined as the average daily 

streamflow 

 of the seven consecutive days of lowest flow within a ten year period. 

Remarks: 
1/4/13 page of 

 POST FOCUS EXPOSURE REPORT 

Chemical ID: P-13-0071 Assessor: Tobias/SS 

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES 

 Scenario#:1 Number of Release Sites: 

 Release Activity: Max ADR 

 Release Description: WATER LANDFILL 

Non-sludge/Sludge 

STACK FUGITIVE 

Total Releases: 

 (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) 

 

 Non-sludge/Sludge 

Release Days/yr: 

Per Site Release: 

 (kg/site/day) (kg/site/day) (kg/site/day) (kg/site/day) 

Remarks: 
1/4/13 page of 

POST FOCUS EXPOSURE REPORT 

 Chemical ID: P-13-0071 

SIC-CODE BASED HUMAN AND AQUATIC EXPOSURES TO SURFACE WATER RELEASES 

SCENARIO #: 1 Number of Sites: RELEASE ACTIVITY: Max 

ADR 

SIC-CODE DESCRIPTION: POTW's (All facilities) 

SIC-CODE (S): 4952 EXPOSED POPULATION: Adult 

WWT 

REMOVAL 

(%) 

RELEASE 

DAYS 

PRETREATMENT 

RELEASE 

(kg/site/day) 

POSTTREATMENT 

RELEASE 

(kg/site/day) 

DWT 

(%) BCF 

(L/kg) 

 0.00 0.00 

AQUATIC EXPOSURE ESTIMATES - SURFACE WATER 

PLANT 

TYPE 

% ILE 

FACILITY 

STREAM FLOW (MLD) STREAM CONC. (μg/l) 

Harmonic 

Mean 30Q5 7Q10 1Q10 

Harmonic 

Mean 30Q5 7Q10 1Q10 

ALL 50 125.56 44.02 26.80 22.53 4.78E-03 1.36E-02 2.24E-02 2.66E-02

ALL 10 11.11 1.94 1.06 0.96 5.40E-02 0.31 0.57 0.63 

DRINKING WATER AND FISH INGESTION EXPOSURE ESTIMATES 

Exposure Units 

Drinking Water Results Drinking 

Water Units Fish Ingestion Results 

Fish 

Ingestion 

Units 

50% 10% 50% 10% 

Cancer 

LADDpot 1.02E-10 1.15E-09 mg/kg/day 0.00 0.00 mg/kg/day 

LADCpot 5.24E-09 5.92E-08 mg/L 0.00 0.00 mg/kg 

Acute 

ADRpot 1.14E-06 2.58E-05 mg/kg/day 0.00 0.00 mg/kg/day 

SIC Code Comments:
#### PEOPLE, Respondent, v. REEVES, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

October 16, 1903.)

Proceeding by the people of the state of New York against Lewis Reeves.

No opinion. Motion granted.
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 21 - SUBSIDIARIES OF BANCORP


      The following table sets forth all of Bancorp's subsidiaries  as
of the date of this report.

                                                            State of
                                                          Jurisdiction
                                       % of Voting       Under the Laws
                                        Securities          of which
                                          Owned             Organized

The Provident Bank                         100                 Ohio
  Provident Commercial Group, Inc.         100                 Ohio
  Provident Securities and Investment
    Company                                100                 Ohio
  PB Realty, Inc.                          100                 Ohio
  Provident Consumer Financial
    Services, Inc.                         100                 Ohio
  A.H.T. Service Corp.                     100              California
The Provident Bank of Kentucky             100               Kentucky
Provident Investment Advisers, Inc.        100                 Ohio
Provident Mortgage Company                 100                 Ohio
Mathematical Investment Management, Inc.   100                 Ohio
```

[House Document 107-31]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

107th Congress, 1st Session - - - - - - - - - - - House Document 107-31 

 
          OMB FINAL SEQUESTRATION REPORT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2001

                               __________

                             COMMUNICATION

                                  from

                      THE DIRECTOR, THE OFFICE OF

                         MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET

                              transmitting

 THE FINAL OMB SEQUESTRATION REPORT TO THE PRESIDENT AND CONGRESS FOR 
                            FISCAL YEAR 2001

January 30, 2001.--Referred to the Committee of the Whole House on the 
              State of the Union and ordered to be printed
                               __________

                    U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE
89-011                     WASHINGTON : 2001

                 Executive Office of the President,
                           Office of Management and Budget,
                                  Washington, DC, January 16, 2001.
Hon. J. Dennis Hastert,
Speaker of the House of Representatives,
Washington, DC.
    Dear Mr. Speaker: Enclosed please find the OMB Final 
Sequestration Report to the President and Congress for fiscal 
year 2001, as required by the Budget Enforcement Act of 1990 
(BEA), as amended.
    The report provides current estimates of the status of 
discretionary spending and the discretionary limits. It also 
provides the status of pay-as-you-go legislation. Comparisons 
with the estimates provided by the Director of the 
Congressional Budget Office in his report are also included.
    Based on the estimates contained in this report, neither 
discretionary nor pay-as-you-go sequesters are required.
            Sincerely,
                                              Jacob J. Lew,
                                                          Director.
    Enclosure.
    Identical Letter Sent to The President of the United States 
and The Honorable Albert Gore.


```
#### 1406.303 Justifications.
1503.101-370 Financial conflicts of interest and loss of impartiality. ( a ) Each EPA employee (including special government employees as defined by 18 U.S.C. 202 and 1503.600-71(b)) engaged in source evaluation and selection is required to abide by and be familiar with the conflict of interest statutes codified in Title 18 of the United States Code, as well as the Standards of Ethical Conduct for Employees of the Executive Branch, 5 CFR part 2635.
( b ) Pursuant to the financial conflict of interest statute, 18 U.S.C. 208 and 5 CFR part 2635, subparts D and E, each employee must abide by ethics requirements regarding financial conflict of interest and impartiality in performing official duties. The employee shall inform his or her Deputy Ethics Official and the Source Selection Authority (SSA) in writing if his/her participation in the source evaluation and selection process may raise possible or apparent conflict of interest or impartiality concerns. The employee must cease work on the source evaluation and selection process until the appropriate ethics official makes a determination. Please note that only the Office of General Counsel can direct employees to divest of financial interests or to recommend any waivers of the financial conflict of interest standards.
FORM 10-Q

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

[x]	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2003

OR

[ ]	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ____________ to ___________

Commission file number 0-827

EMPIRE STATE BUILDING ASSOCIATES L.L.C.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

A New York Limited Liability Company	13-6084254

(State or other jurisdiction of 	(I.R.S. Employer

incorporation or organization)	Identification No.)

60 East 42nd Street, New York, New York

(Address of principal executive offices)

10165

(Zip Code)

(212) 687-8700

(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

N/A

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [ X ].  No [   ].

An Exhibit Index is located on Page 14 of this Report.

Number of pages (including exhibits) in this filing: 14

PART I.  FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.  Financial Statements.

Empire State Building Associates L.L.C.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income

(Unaudited)

	For the Three Months	For the Six Months

	Ended June 30,	Ended June 30,

	2003	2002	2003	2002
### §4538. Additional authority

(a) No provision of this subchapter shall be construed to preempt or supersede any other program relating to milk or dairy products research organized and operated under the laws of the United States or any State.

(b) The provisions of this subchapter applicable to the order issued under section 4533(b) of this title shall be applicable to any amendment to the order.

(Pub. L. 98–180, title I, §137, as added Pub. L. 99–198, title I, §121, Dec. 23, 1985, 99 Stat. 1372.)
## *A r c h i v e d  I n f o r m a t i o n*
### Part VIII—General Penalty Provisions
#### Mollie Leibowitz, Respondent, v. Elaine Cohen et al., Appellants.

— In a replevin action to recover a diamond ring or damages, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated April 2, 1963, which granted plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment against the defendant Elaine Cohen, and *inter alla*directed an assessment to determine the value of the ring and the damages, if any. Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment denied. In our opinion, the record presents triable issues of fact which should be resolved upon a plenary trial. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld, Hill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Frank Cole, Also Known as Frank Douglas Freeland, Appellant, v. W. Cecil Johnston, as Superintendent of Matteawan State Hospital, Respondent. The People of the State of New York ex rel. Frank Cole, Also Known as Frank Douglas Freeland, Appellant, v. Maynard Allen, as Warden of Westchester County Jail, Respondent.

In two habeas corpus proceedings, the relator appeals from: (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated March 29, 1962; and (2) an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, dated February 18, 1963, each of which dismissed the writ after a hearing and remanded the relator to custody. Appeal from order dated March 29, 1962 dismissed, without costs, as moot. It appears that during the pendency of the appeal from such order, relator was committed to Matteawan State Hospital and that he is no longer in the custody of the Warden of the Westchester County Jail, to whom the writ of habeas corpus was addressed. Order dated February 18, 1963 reversed on the law, without costs, and proceeding remitted to the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, for the purpose of: (a) holding a further hearing; and (b) making a determination *de novo*on the basis of the proof adduced upon such hearing. No questions of fact were considered. By writ of habeas corpus relator sought his release from Matteawan State Hospital, where he had been committed for lack of capacity to understand the charges against him or to defend against them (Code Grim. Pro., § 658 *et seq.).*Upon the hearing relator was not allowed to produce evidence in his behalf or to cross-examine the only witness against him. We consider this to be reversible error (see *Matter of Friedel*v. *Board of Regents,*296 N. Y. 347). Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Brennan, Hill and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                5


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                  JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                    DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                          2,762
<SECURITIES>                    28,525
<RECEIVABLES>                   0
<ALLOWANCES>                    0
<INVENTORY>                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                32,862
<PP&E>                          2,500
<DEPRECIATION>                  0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  35,362
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           0
<BONDS>                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     0
<COMMON>                        605,840
<OTHER-SE>                      (277,951)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    35,362
<SALES>                         0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                0
<CGS>                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   9,135
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 (9,132)
<INCOME-TAX>                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             (9,132)
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    (9,132)
<EPS-BASIC>                   (.004)
<EPS-DILUTED>                   (.004)



</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL
INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE COMPANY'S
AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE
PERIOD ENDING MARCH 31, 2000, AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>  1,000

<S>                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                   MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                            $  3,263
<SECURITIES>                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                       17,236
<ALLOWANCES>                             0
<INVENTORY>                         15,110
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                    37,001
<PP&E>                              93,821
<DEPRECIATION>                      53,023
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      89,411
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               18,692
<BONDS>                                  0
<COMMON>                             1,048
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                    0
<PREFERRED>                              0
<OTHER-SE>                          53,647
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>        89,411
<SALES>                             89,280
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                    89,280
<CGS>                               77,023
<TOTAL-COSTS>                        2,828
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      62
<INCOME-PRETAX>                      9,367
<INCOME-TAX>                         3,186
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                  6,181
<DISCONTINUED>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                          0
<CHANGES>                                0
<NET-INCOME>                         6,181
<EPS-BASIC>                         5.79
<EPS-DILUTED>                         5.79



</TABLE>
FILED 11/18/2011

MICHAEL W. DOBBINS CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT

GY

Case: 1:11-cv-07911 Document #: 7 Filed: 11/18/11 Page 1 of 7 PageID #:16
Case: 1:11-cv-07911 Document #: 7 Filed: 11/18/11 Page 2 of 7 PageID #:17
Case: 1:11-cv-07911 Document #: 7 Filed: 11/18/11 Page 3 of 7 PageID #:18
Case: 1:11-cv-07911 Document #: 7 Filed: 11/18/11 Page 4 of 7 PageID #:19
Case: 1:11-cv-07911 Document #: 7 Filed: 11/18/11 Page 5 of 7 PageID #:20
Case: 1:11-cv-07911 Document #: 7 Filed: 11/18/11 Page 6 of 7 PageID #:21
Case: 1:11-cv-07911 Document #: 7 Filed: 11/18/11 Page 7 of 7 PageID #:22
### §8712. Payment yields

#### (a) Establishment and purpose

For the purpose of making direct payments and counter-cyclical payments under this subchapter, the Secretary shall provide for the establishment of a yield for each farm for any designated oilseed or eligible pulse crop for which a payment yield was not established under section 7912 of this title in accordance with this section.

#### (b) Payment yields for designated oilseeds and eligible pulse crops

#### (1) Determination of average yield

In the case of designated oilseeds and eligible pulse crops, the Secretary shall determine the average yield per planted acre for the designated oilseed or pulse crop on a farm for the 1998 through 2001 crop years, excluding any crop year in which the acreage planted to the designated oilseed or pulse crop was zero.

#### (2) Adjustment for payment yield

#### (A) In general

The payment yield for a farm for a designated oilseed or eligible pulse crop shall be equal to the product of the following:

(i) The average yield for the designated oilseed or pulse crop determined under paragraph (1).

(ii) The ratio resulting from dividing the national average yield for the designated oilseed or pulse crop for the 1981 through 1985 crops by the national average yield for the designated oilseed or pulse crop for the 1998 through 2001 crops.

#### (B) No national average yield information available

To the extent that national average yield information for a designated oilseed or pulse crop is not available, the Secretary shall use such information as the Secretary determines to be fair and equitable to establish a national average yield under this section.

#### (3) Use of partial county average yield

If the yield per planted acre for a crop of a designated oilseed or pulse crop for a farm for any of the 1998 through 2001 crop years was less than 75 percent of the county yield for that designated oilseed or pulse crop, the Secretary shall assign a yield for that crop year equal to 75 percent of the county yield for the purpose of determining the average under paragraph (1).

#### (4) No historic yield data available

In the case of establishing yields for designated oilseeds and eligible pulse crops, if historic yield data is not available, the Secretary shall use the ratio for dry peas calculated under paragraph (2)(A)(ii) in determining the yields for designated oilseeds and eligible pulse crops, as determined to be fair and equitable by the Secretary.

(Pub. L. 110–234, title I, §1102, May 22, 2008, 122 Stat. 940; Pub. L. 110–246, §4(a), title I, §1102, June 18, 2008, 122 Stat. 1664, 1669.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Pub. L. 110–234 and Pub. L. 110–246 enacted identical sections. Pub. L. 110–234 was repealed by section 4(a) of Pub. L. 110–246.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Enactment of this section and repeal of Pub. L. 110–234 by Pub. L. 110–246 effective May 22, 2008, the date of enactment of Pub. L. 110–234, see section 4 of Pub. L. 110–246, set out as a note under section 8701 of this title.
#### 15.300 Scope of subpart.

This subpart prescribes policies and procedures for selection of a source or sources in competitive negotiated acquisitions.
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 249 (Tuesday, December 29, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Page 85653]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-28618]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; NIAID Resource Related Research 
Projects (R24 Clinical Trial Not Allowed).
    Date: January 22, 2021.
    Time: 11:30 a.m. to 1:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, 
National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3F52, 
Rockville, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Jennifer Hartt Meyers, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural 
Activities, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, 
National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3F52, 
Rockville, MD 20852, 301-761-6602, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#ee848b808087888b9cc0838b978b9c9dae808786c0898198"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="214b444f4f484744530f4c4458445352614f48490f464e57">[email protected]</span></a>.
(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: December 21, 2020.
Tyeshia M. Roberson,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2020-28618 Filed 12-28-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# Program

# Quarterly

# Historical