alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v James T. Borush, Appellant.

[834 NYS2d 340]—

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Tioga County (Sgueglia, J.), rendered October 31, 2005, which revoked defendant’s probation and imposed a sentence of imprisonment.

Defendant was sentenced to a three-year term of probation upon his conviction of the underlying crimes of driving while intoxicated and aggravated unlicensed operation of a motor vehicle in the second degree, both misdemeanors. When he subsequently violated the terms of his probation, it was revoked. County Court then resentenced him on the underlying crimes to two eight-month terms of incarceration in the Tioga County jail, to run consecutively. Defendant appeals.

Defendant contends and the People forthrightly concede that the consecutive sentences imposed upon defendant upon resentencing are illegal. Based upon our review of the record and Penal Law § 70.25 (2), we agree. Both of the crimes providing the basis for defendant’s underlying conviction arose from a single act, namely, defendant’s operation of a motor vehicle on December 24, 2003 while he was under the influence of alcohol and his license was revoked. Because the act of driving a motor vehicle while intoxicated and while suspended was a single act, concurrent sentences should have been imposed *(see*Penal Law § 70.25 [2]; *People v De Maio,*304 AD2d 988 [2003]). Moreover, given that the maximum sentence for aggravated unlicensed operation of á motor vehicle in the second degree is 180 days in jail *(see*Vehicle and Traffic Law § 511 [2] [b]), the sentence for that crime should be reduced accordingly.

Spain, J.E, Mugglin, Rose, Lahtinen and Kane, JJ., concur. *891Ordered that the judgment is modified, on the law, by reducing the sentence imposed upon defendant’s conviction of the crime of aggravated unlicensed operation of a motor vehicle in the second degree to 180 days in jail, and directing that the jail sentences imposed for his convictions of the crimes of driving while intoxicated and aggravated unlicensed operation of a motor vehicle in the second degree shall run concurrently, rather than consecutively, and, as so modified, affirmed.
#### 1.101 Purpose.

The Federal Acquisition Regulations System is established for the codification and publication of uniform policies and procedures for acquisition by all executive agencies. The Federal Acquisition Regulations System consists of the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), which is the primary document, and agency acquisition regulations that implement or supplement the FAR. The FAR System does not include internal agency guidance of the type described in 1.301(a)(2).

[48 FR 42103, Sept. 19, 1983, as amended at 51 FR 27116, July 29, 1986]
### §2325. Repealed. Pub. L. 96–574, §2, Dec. 22, 1980, 94 Stat. 3350

Section, Pub. L. 91–577, title I, §5, Dec. 24, 1970, 84 Stat. 1542, required employees designated by Secretary to give bond before entering upon their duties.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, October 03, 2016. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, October 03, 2016 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A17D0076. PLATINUM STAFFING, INC. v. MARK BUTLER, COMMISSIONER OF DEPARTMENT OF LABOR et al. .
Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.
LC NUMBERS: 2016CV273067
EXHIBIT 31.1

# CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF
EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO

# SECTION 302 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Krish A. Prabhu, certify that:

|1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Tellabs, Inc.; and
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|2. | Based on my knowledge, this Amendment No. 1 does not contain any untrue statement of a
          material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
          made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
          misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: May 26, 2005

/s Krish A. Prabhu

Krish A. Prabhu
Chief Executive Officer
### §5601. Purpose

It is the purpose of this chapter to increase the profitability of farming and to increase opportunities for United States farms and agricultural enterprises by—

(1) increasing the effectiveness of the Department of Agriculture in agricultural export policy formulation and implementation;

(2) improving the competitiveness of United States agricultural commodities and products in the world market; and

(3) providing for the coordination and efficient implementation of all agricultural export programs.

(Pub. L. 95–501, title I, §101, as added Pub. L. 101–624, title XV, §1531, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 3669.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 101 of Pub. L. 95–501 amended section 1707a of this title prior to the complete revision of Pub. L. 95–501 by Pub. L. 101–624.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Short Title of 1994 Amendment

Pub. L. 103–465, title IV, §411(a)(1), Dec. 8, 1994, 108 Stat. 4962, provided that: "This subsection [amending section 5651 of this title] may be cited as the 'Export Enhancement Program Amendments of 1994'."

#### Short Title

Pub. L. 95–501, §1, as added by Pub. L. 101–624, title XV, §1531, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 3669, provided that: "This Act [enacting this chapter] may be cited as the 'Agricultural Trade Act of 1978'."
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 782 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 782

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To reauthorize the National Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force 
                    Program, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Providing Resources, Officers, and 
Technology To Eradicate Cyber Threats to Our Children Act of 2017'' or 
the ``PROTECT Our Children Act of 2017''.

SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF THE NATIONAL INTERNET CRIMES AGAINST 
              CHILDREN TASK FORCE PROGRAM.

    Title I of the PROTECT Our Children Act of 2008 (42 U.S.C. 17601 et 
seq.) is amended--
            (1) in section 105(h) (42 U.S.C. 17615(h)), by striking 
        ``2016'' and inserting ``2022''; and
            (2) in section 107(a)(10) (42 U.S.C. 17617(a)(10)), by 
        striking ``fiscal year 2018'' and inserting ``each of fiscal 
        years 2018 through 2022''.

            Passed the Senate June 15, 2017.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
115th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                 S. 782

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To reauthorize the National Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force 
                    Program, and for other purposes.
```
#### 1352.219-70 Section 8(a) direct award (Deviation).

As prescribed in 48 CFR 1319.811-3(a), insert the following clause:

# Section 8(A) Direct Award (Dl) (APR 2010)

(a) This contract is issued as a direct award between the contracting activity and the 8(a) contractor pursuant to a Partnership Agreement between the Small Business Administration (SBA) and the Department of Commerce (DOC). Accordingly, the SBA, even if not identified in Section A of this contract, is the prime contractor and retains responsibility for 8(a) certification, 8(a) eligibility determinations and related issues, and providing counseling and assistance to the 8(a) contractor under the 8(a) program. The cognizant SBA district office is:

[To be completed by the Contracting Officer at time of award]

(b) The contracting activity is responsible for administering the contract and taking any action on behalf of the Government under the terms and conditions of the contract. However, the contracting activity shall give advance notice to the SBA before it issues a final notice terminating performance, either in whole or in part, under the contract. The contracting activity shall also coordinate with SBA prior to processing any novation agreement. The contracting activity may assign contract administration functions to a contract administration office.

(c) The 8(a) contractor agrees:

(1) To notify the Contracting Officer, simultaneously with its notification to SBA (as required by SBA's 8(a) regulations), when the owner or owners upon whom 8(a) eligibility is based plan to relinquish ownership or control of the concern. Consistent with 15 U.S.C. 637(a)(21), transfer of ownership or control shall result in termination of the contract for convenience, unless SBA waives the requirement prior to the actual relinquishing of ownership or control; and

(2) To adhere to the requirements of FAR 52.219-14, Limitations on Subcontracting.

(End of clause)

[75 FR 10570, Mar. 8, 2010; 75 FR 14496, Mar. 26, 2010]
Fiscal Year 2014 Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies - NEVADA

FY 2014 Title I

LEA ID District Allocation*

3200390 Carson City School District 1,470,428

3200030 Churchill County School District 675,862

3200060 Clark County School District 90,236,762

3200090 Douglas County School District 677,011

3200120 Elko County School District 822,993

3200150 Esmeralda County School District 15,117

3200180 Eureka County School District 21,347

3200210 Humboldt County School District 379,085

3200240 Lander County School District 99,109

3200270 Lincoln County School District 125,330

3200300 Lyon County School District 1,564,133

3200330 Mineral County School District 119,813

3200360 Nye County School District 1,451,226

3200420 Pershing County School District 164,477

3200450 Storey County School District 38,617

3200480 Washoe County School District 16,445,562

3200510 White Pine County School District 184,149

3299999 PART D SUBPART 2 916,657

* Actual amounts received by LEAs will be smaller than shown here due to State-level adjustments to Federal Title I allocations. States adjust

 allocations, for example, to reflect LEA boundary changes or the creation of new LEAs, including charter school LEAs, that are not accounted

 for in the statutory calculations. States also are permitted to reserve, for administration, up to 1 percent of the allocations they would receive

 if $14 billion were appropriated and generally must reserve 4 percent in fiscal year 2014 for school improvement activities. These 

 adjustments will reduce the actual amounts available.
1 

Office of Finance and Operations (OFO): Office of Human Resources (OHR) – Effective 3/13/2023

OHR Organization – Graphic Version
2 

OHR Organization - Accessible Text Version

• Chief Human Capital Officer (EKH)

o Deputy Chief Human Capital Officer (EKH)

 Human Capital Policy & Accountability Division (EKHC)

 Workforce Relations Division (EKHG)

• Performance Management Branch (EKHG1)

• Benefits and Work/Life (EKHG2) 

 Talent Development Division (EKHL)

 Recruitment, Staffing, and Compensation Division (EKHM)

• Classification and Advisory Branch (EKHM1)

• Staffing and Advisory Branch A (EKHM2)

• Staffing and Advisory Branch B (EKHM3)

• Payroll and Personnel Processing Branch (EKHM4)

 Human Capital Strategy Division (EKHS)

 Labor & Employee Relations Division (New EKHR)

• Business and Administrative Services Division

• Executive Resources Division
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 63 

To clarify the rights of Indians and Indian tribes on Indian lands under 

the National Labor Relations Act. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 9, 2017 

Mr. MORAN (for himself, Mr. CRAPO, Mr. DAINES, Mr. FLAKE, Mr. GARDNER, Mr. JOHNSON, Mr. LANKFORD, Mr. MCCAIN, Mr. THUNE, Mr. 

WICKER, and Mr. RISCH) introduced the following bill; which was read 

twice and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs 

A BILL 

To clarify the rights of Indians and Indian tribes on Indian 

lands under the National Labor Relations Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Tribal Labor Sov5 ereignty Act of 2017’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DEFINITION OF EMPLOYER. 

7 Section 2 of the National Labor Relations Act (29 

8 U.S.C. 152) is amended— 


srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 63 IS

1 (1) in paragraph (2), by inserting ‘‘or any In2 dian tribe, or any enterprise or institution owned 

3 and operated by an Indian tribe and located on its 

4 Indian lands,’’ after ‘‘subdivision thereof,’’; and 

5 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

6 ‘‘(15) The term ‘Indian tribe’ means any Indian 

7 tribe, band, nation, pueblo, or other organized group 

8 or community which is recognized as eligible for the 

9 special programs and services provided by the 

10 United States to Indians because of their status as 

11 Indians. 

12 ‘‘(16) The term ‘Indian’ means any individual 

13 who is a member of an Indian tribe. 

14 ‘‘(17) The term ‘Indian lands’ means— 

15 ‘‘(A) all lands within the limits of any In16 dian reservation; 

17 ‘‘(B) any lands title to which is either held 

18 in trust by the United States for the benefit of 

19 any Indian tribe or individual or held by any 

20 Indian tribe or individual subject to restriction 

21 by the United States against alienation; and 

22 ‘‘(C) any lands in the State of Oklahoma 

23 that are within the boundaries of a former resVerDate Sep 11 2014 20:39 Jan 19, 2017 Jkt 069200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S63.IS S63

srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 63 IS

1 ervation (as defined by the Secretary of the In2 terior) of a federally recognized Indian tribe.’’. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE O F FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME E XPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CALIB J. SCOTT

,

Appellant

,

v. Case No. 5D 22

- 1043

LT Case No. 2019

- 303509

- CFDB

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

.

________________________________/

Decision filed June 13, 2023

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Volusia County

, Dawn D. Nichols , Judge.

Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender, and Darnelle Paige Lawshe, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General,
Tallahassee, and Richard A. Pallas, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LAMBERT

, C.J.

, EDWARDS and SOUD , JJ., concur.
**UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION**

# THE  SECRETARY

MEMORANDUM

TO:**Director, Executive Management Staff**

Office of the Secretary

Mitchell Dedert

Office of the Secretary

FROM:The Deputy Secretary

SUBJECT: Delegation of Authority for Domestic Travel 

I.DELEGATION

Under the authority from the Chief Financial Officer vested in me by delegation EL/GEN/7, certified June 6, 2003, I hereby delegate to you and to anyone serving for the Director, Executive Management Staff, in an acting capacity the authorities described below. These authorities must be exercised in accordance with 41 CFR Chapters 300-304, commonly known as the Federal Travel Regulation. This delegation covers travel for the Office of the Secretary.

A.To both addressees:

The authority to certify travel authorizations and travel vouchers for temporary duty within the United States, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands, including:

1. Authority to approve use of non-contract carriers between defined city pairs.

2. Authority to approve the use of public transportation between defined locations.

3. Authority to approve the use of privately owned conveyances by employees when advantageous to the Government.

4. Authority to approve rental automobile and miscellaneous travel expenses.

B.To the Director, Executive Management Staff:

1. The authority to certify travel authorizations and travel vouchers for permanent changes of station within the United States.

2. The authority to approve, for wheelchair users and if necessary one attendant, direct flights and upgrades to business class when bulkhead seating is not available.

Unless otherwise noted in future delegations of authority, amendments to the authority cited herein are included within the scope of this delegation.

II.RESERVATIONS

A.Except as described in Section I, the authority to approve international and territorial travel is reserved to the Deputy Secretary.

B.The authority to approve first-class travel accommodations, cash travel advances, and actual subsistence expenses over the total allowable per diem rate for each trip in accordance with the Federal Travel Regulation is reserved to the Director, Financial Management Operations, Office of the Chief Financial Officer, or his or her delegatee.

C.The authority to certify one's own travel and voucher expenses is reserved to the Secretary.

III. REDELEGATION

No further redelegation is authorized.

IV. CERTIFICATION AND EFFECTIVE DATE

The delegation is effective upon certification by the Department's Principal Delegations Control Officer and supersedes delegation EB/EA-1/121. I hereby ratify actions within the scope of this delegation taken by the addressees prior to the date of certification.

__________/s/___________

                          William D. Hansen

OGC Clearance and Date:  /s/ Barry W. Stevens, 6/20/2003

Certified on:  6/25/2003

Departmental Delegations Control Officer:  /s/ Naty G. Beetle

Control Number:  **EA/EA1/149**
SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT


NSS Numanco, Inc.

Henze Services, Inc.

NSS of Delaware, Inc.

IceSolv, Inc.

Oliver B. Cannon & Son, Inc.

Sline Industrial Painters, Inc.


(1) NSS Henze Service, Inc. and Movats Incorporated
    were merged to form Henze-Movats Incorporated on
    October 1, 1989.  Valve Service Center, Inc.,
    acquired on November 1, 1989 was merged into Henze-
    Movats Incorporated on March 22, 1990.  Effective
    December 31, 1990 the Company sold to Westinghouse
    Electric Corporation the nuclear valve diagnostic,
    actuator and valve maintenance operations of the
    subsidiary.  The non-nuclear valve, actuator and
    maintenance operations remain part of the Company
    and operate under the name of Henze Services, Inc.

(2) IceSolv, Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation,
    was formed in June 1993.

(3) On November 19, 1993 and effective for financial
   purposes, October 1, 1993, Nuclear Support
   Services, Inc. purchased 100% of the outstanding
   stock of Oliver B. Cannon & Son, Inc. and Sline
   Industrial Painters, Inc.  The two companies are
   marketed together as Cannon Sline.



                 Exhibit 22
### §6803. Issuance of orders

#### (a) In general

#### (1) Issuance

To effectuate the policy of this chapter specified in section 6801(b) of this title, the Secretary, subject to the procedures provided in subsection (b), shall issue orders under this chapter applicable to qualified handlers of cut flowers and cut greens.

#### (2) Scope

Any order shall be national in scope.

#### (3) One order

Not more than 1 order shall be in effect at any 1 time.

#### (b) Procedures

#### (1) Proposal for an order

#### (A) Secretary

The Secretary may propose the issuance of an order.

#### (B) Other persons

An industry group that represents a substantial number of the industry members who are to be assessed under the order, or any other person who will be affected by this chapter, may request the issuance of, and submit a proposal for, an order.

#### (2) Publication of proposal

The Secretary shall publish a proposed order and give notice and opportunity for public comment on the proposed order not later than 60 days after the earlier of—

(A) the date on which the Secretary proposes an order, as provided in paragraph (1)(A); and

(B) the date of the receipt by the Secretary of a proposal for an order, as provided in paragraph (1)(B).

#### (3) Issuance of order

#### (A) In general

After notice and opportunity for public comment are provided in accordance with paragraph (2), the Secretary shall issue the order, taking into consideration the comments received and including in the order such provisions as are necessary to ensure that the order is in conformity with this chapter.

#### (B) Effective date

The order shall be issued and become effective not later than 180 days after publication of the proposed order.

#### (c) Amendments

The Secretary, from time to time, may amend an order. The provisions of this chapter applicable to an order shall be applicable to any amendment to an order.

(Pub. L. 103–190, §4, Dec. 14, 1993, 107 Stat. 2271.)
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-13-00349-CV

Pickett, Kelm & Associates, Inc., Appellant

v.

Femica Newkirk, Individually and as Parent of the Minor Child, M. J., Deceased, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 345TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. D-1-GN-10-000742, HONORABLE AMY CLARK MEACHUM, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

The clerk’s record in this appeal is overdue to be filed. The trial court clerk’s office

has reported that Pickett, Kelm & Associates has failed to pay or make arrangements to pay for the

clerk’s record in this appeal. This Court’s clerk sent a letter dated July 16, 2013, to appellant’s

attorney requesting that she make arrangements to pay for the clerk’s record and that she submit a

status report regarding this appeal with this Court. Appellant’s attorney was requested to file a

response in this Court on or before July 26, 2013, or risk dismissal of this appeal.

July 26, 2013, has passed. The clerk’s record has not been filed, and appellant has

not filed any response in this Court. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. 

See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b), 42.3(b).
_____________________________________________

J. Woodfin Jones, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Pemberton and Field

Dismissed for Want of Prosecution

Filed: September 20, 2013

2