alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1201.105-2 Arrangement of regulations. ( a ) *General.* The TAR, which encompasses both Department and Operating Administration (OA)/Office of the Assistant Secretary for Research and Technology (OST-R)-specific guidance (*see* subpart 1201.3), conforms with the arrangement and numbering system prescribed by FAR 1.104. Guidance that is OA-specific contains the OA's acronym directly after the heading.
( b ) *Numbering* — ( 1 ) *Department-wide guidance.* ( i ) The numbering illustrations at FAR 1.105-2(b) apply to the TAR.
( ii ) Coverage within the TAR is identified by the prefix “12” followed by the complete TAR citation. For example, 1201.201-1(b).
( iii ) Coverage in the TAR that supplements the FAR will use part, subpart, section, and subsection numbers ending in “70” through “89” (*e.g.,* 1201.301-70). A series of numbers beginning with “70” is used for provisions and clauses.
( iv ) Coverage in the TAR, other than that identified with a “70” or higher number, that implements the FAR uses the identical number sequence and caption of the FAR segment being implemented, which may be to the paragraph level. Paragraph numbers and letters are not always shown sequentially, but may be shown by the specific FAR paragraph implemented. For example, TAR 1201.201-1 contains only paragraph (b) because only this paragraph, correlated with the FAR, is implemented in the TAR.
( 2 ) *Operating Administration-unique guidance.* Supplementary material for which there is no counterpart in the FAR or TAR shall be identified using chapter, part, subpart, section, or subsection numbers of “90” and higher.
( c ) *References and citations.* The Department of Transportation Acquisition Regulation may be referred to as the TAR. Cross reference to the FAR in the TAR will be cited by “FAR” followed by the FAR numbered citation, and cross reference to the TAM in the TAR will be cited by “TAM” followed by the TAM numbered citations. References to specific citations within the TAR will be referenced by the numbered citation only, *e.g.,* 1201.105-3. ( 3 ) Using the TAR coverage at 1201.105-2(b) as a typical illustration, reference to the— ( i ) Part would be “TAR part 1201” outside the TAR and “part 1201” within the TAR.
( ii ) Subpart would be “TAR subpart 1201.1” outside the TAR and “subpart 1201.1” within the TAR.
( iii ) Section would be “TAR 1201.105” outside the TAR and “1201.105” within the TAR.
( iv ) Subsection would be “TAR 1201.105-2” outside the TAR and “1201.105-2” within the TAR.
( v ) Paragraph would be “TAR 1201.105-2(b)” outside the TAR and “1201.105-2(b)” within the TAR.
### §439d. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, July 2, 1948, ch. 818, §5, 62 Stat. 1235, related to assumption of obligations of Muscatine, Iowa, plant, and was omitted from the Code as obsolete.
1 

DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION DIVISION

NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING AND PROPOSED AMENDMENTS

TO GEORGIA’S STATE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

TO ALL INTERESTED PERSONS AND PARTIES: 

Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to the authority set forth below, the Environmental 

Protection Division (hereinafter, “EPD”) of the Georgia Department of Natural Resources 

proposes amendments to Georgia’s State Implementation Plan (SIP). The proposed revision is 

described below: 

The proposed State Implementation Plan revision includes Georgia's request under the Clean 

Air Act that the metro Atlanta region 8-hour ozone nonattainment area be redesignated to 

attainment with respect to the 1997 National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) for Ozone 

as well as Georgia’s plan to maintain attainment of the ozone standard in the Atlanta area. 

This notice is being provided to all persons who have requested in writing that they be placed on 

a notification list. The proposed SIP revision may be viewed at 

http://www.georgiaair.org/airpermit/html/planningsupport/regdev/sips_and_revisions/sips_and_revisions.htm or 

during normal business hours of 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. at the Georgia Environmental Protection 

Division, Air Protection Branch, 4244 International Parkway, Suite 120, Atlanta, Georgia 30354. 

Copies may also be requested by contacting the Air Protection Branch at 404/363-7000 or the 

Environmental Protection Division Director’s Office at 1-888-373-5947. 

To provide the public an opportunity to comment upon and provide input into the proposed SIP 

revision, a public hearing will be held at 3:00 p.m. on February 27, 2012, in the EPD Training 

Center located at 4244 International Parkway, Suite 116, Atlanta, Georgia 30354. At the 

hearing, anyone may present data, make a statement, comment or offer a viewpoint or 

argument either orally or in writing. Lengthy statements or statements of a considerable 

technical or economic nature, as well as previously recorded messages, must be submitted in 

writing for the official record. Oral statements should be concise. 

Written comments are welcomed. To insure their inclusion in EPD's final submission of the SIP 

revision to EPA, written comments should be received by close of business by March 5, 2012. 

Written comments may be emailed to EPDComments@dnr.state.ga.us or sent via regular mail 

addressed to: Branch Chief, Air Protection Branch, 4244 International Parkway, Suite 120, 

Atlanta, Georgia, 30354. 

The proposed SIP revision is proposed pursuant to authority contained in Georgia Air Quality 

Act (O.C.G.A. Section 12-9-1 et. seq.). For further information, contact the Air Protection 

Branch at 404/363-7000.
#### In the Matter of Felicia Shpritzer, on Behalf of Herself and Others Similarly Situated, v. Theodore H. Lang.

Motion to dismiss appeal granted, with $10 costs, unless the appellants procure the record on appeal and appellants’ points to be served and filed on or before September 11, 1962, with notice of argument for the October 1962 Term of this court, said appeal to be argued or submitted when reached. Concur — Rabin, J. P., Valente, McNally, Stevens and Eager, JJ.
##### 



Exhibit 31.3 CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
RULES 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e),
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Ira D. Kaplan, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Claires Stores, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant
as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
and we have:  a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in
the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting. September 2, 2004
    
    /s/ Ira D. KaplanIra D. KaplanChief Financial Officer
 23
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from SEC
Form 10Q and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-29-2000             JAN-29-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1999             JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-30-1999             OCT-30-1999
<CASH>                                         101,547                 101,547
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                    101,303                 101,303
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               248,968                 248,968
<PP&E>                                         262,414                 262,414
<DEPRECIATION>                                 132,106                 132,106
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 437,492                 437,492
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           67,024                  67,024
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                         2,417                   2,417
<OTHER-SE>                                     355,024                 355,024
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   437,492                 437,492
<SALES>                                        182,750                 539,503
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               182,750                 539,503
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   92,658                 269,254
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                70,117                 196,315
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 19,975                  73,934
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,249                  27,088
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             12,726                  46,846
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                    14,002                  46,610
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .25                     .92
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .25                     .91


</TABLE>
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 10(h)-6


FIFTH SUPPLEMENT TO THE
CAPACITY AND ENERGY SALES AGREEMENT
FROM PENNSYLVANIA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY (PP&L)
TO BALTIMORE GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY (BG&E)

	Fifth Supplement (Fifth Supplemented Agreement) dated as of 
the 13th day of July, 1993 to the Capacity and Energy Sales 
Agreement (Basic Agreement) dated January 28, 1988, as 
supplemented.

	WHEREAS, the Parties intend to amend the Basic Agreement, as 
supplemented, to change the rate of return on common equity 
thereunder to 11%.

	NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties hereby agree and covenant to 
amend the Basic Agreement, as supplemented, as follows:

	1.  This Fifth Supplemental Agreement shall become effective 
on July 15, 1993, unless otherwise ordered by the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission.  All terms and conditions of the Basic 
Agreement, as supplemented shall remain in full force and effect, 
unless specifically revised by this Fifth Supplemental Agreement.

	2.  The only revision to the Basic Agreement, as 
supplemented, made by this Fifth Supplemental Agreement is that 
in Exhibit A subpart (B)(2) 12.75% shall be replace by 11%.

                              BALTIMORE GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
                                    /s/
WITNESS:                      By: ____________________________

                              Name: _Herbert D. Coss, Jr._____

_________________________     Title: Vice President
Margaret W. Krubbel


                              PENNSYLVANIA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY
                                   /s/
WITNESS:                      By: ______________________________

                              Name: _Raymond F. Suhocki_________

_________________________     Title:  Vice President-System Power
Cheryl D. Cincilla
# FY 04 GA Loan Volume

# Historical
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7487

BRIAN KEITH HART,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

SNODDGRASS, Warden,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. David G. Lowe, Magistrate Judge.

(CA-95-181-3)

Submitted: March 5, 1996 Decided: March 28, 1996

Before HALL and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Brian Keith Hart, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Bain Smith, Assistant

Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying

relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we grant a certificate of probable cause and

affirm the district court. All of the Appellant's claims are procedurally barred, see Harris v. Reed, 489 U.S. 255 (1989); Wainright

v. Sykes, 433 U.S. 72, 87 (1977), except those alleging that his

trial attorney rendered ineffective assistance of counsel and that

his sentence was excessive. The claims that are not procedurally

barred, though, are without merit, as explained in the district

court's opinion. Hart v. Snoddgrass, No. CA-95-181-3 (E.D. Va.

Sept. 8, 1995). We deny the motion for bail pending appeal in light

of this disposition. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
Document has been coded “ C ” Claimed Confidential Must be Requested

under the Freedom of Information Act.
#### Arthur Cromarty, Individually and as Parent and Natural Guardian of Scott Cromarty, an Infant, et al., Appellants, v Madison Square Garden Corp. et al., Respondents.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., plaintiffs appeals from (1) an order of the Supreme *792Court, Westchester County, dated January 9, 1978, which denied their application for a general preference, and (2) a further order of the same court, dated March 15, 1978, which denied their motion for reargument. Appeal from the order dated March 15, 1978 dismissed, without costs or disbursements. No appeal lies from an order denying reargument. Order dated January 9, 1978 reversed, without costs or disbursements, and general preference granted. In view of the conflicting medical opinions as to the permanency of the infant plaintiffs’ injuries, it was an improvident exercise of discretion to deny a preference. Hopkins, J. P., Damiani, Rabin and Shapiro, JJ., concur.
15.206 Amending the solicitation. ( a ) When, either before or after receipt of proposals, the Government changes its requirements or terms and conditions, the contracting officer shall amend the solicitation.
( b ) Amendments issued before the established time and date for receipt of proposals shall be issued to all parties receiving the solicitation.
( c ) Amendments issued after the established time and date for receipt of proposals shall be issued to all offerors that have not been eliminated from the competition.
( d ) If a proposal of interest to the Government involves a departure from the stated requirements, the contracting officer shall amend the solicitation, provided this can be done without revealing to the other offerors the alternate solution proposed or any other information that is entitled to protection (see 15.207(b) and 15.306(e)).
( e ) If, in the judgment of the contracting officer, based on market research or otherwise, an amendment proposed for issuance after offers have been received is so substantial as to exceed what prospective offerors reasonably could have anticipated, so that additional sources likely would have submitted offers had the substance of the amendment been known to them, the contracting officer shall cancel the original solicitation and issue a new one, regardless of the stage of the acquisition.
( f ) Oral notices may be used when time is of the essence. The contracting officer shall document the contract file and formalize the notice with an amendment (see subpart 4.5, Electronic Commerce in Contracting).
( g ) At a minimum, the following information should be included in each amendment: ( 1 ) Name and address of issuing activity.
( 2 ) Solicitation number and date.
( 3 ) Amendment number and date.
( 4 ) Number of pages.
( 5 ) Description of the change being made.
( 6 ) Government point of contact and phone number (and electronic or facsimile address, if appropriate).
( 7 ) Revision to solicitation closing date, if applicable.
Exhibit 99-1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Equity Oil Company (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending
September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Paul M. Dougan, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,to the best of my knowledge and belief that:



| | /s/PAUL M. DOUGANPaul M. Dougan, President Chief Executive
OfficerNovember 14, 2002
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Equity Oil Company (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending
September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Russell V. Florence, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,to the best of my knowledge and belief that:



| | /s/RUSSELL V. FLORENCERussell V. Florence Treasurer Chief
Financial OfficerNovember 14, 2002
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

2

---

QuickLinks
110 FY 2017 AGENCY FINANCIAL REPORT | U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

SUMMARY OF FINANCIAL STATEMENT AUDIT AND 

MANAGEMENT ASSURANCES

The following tables provide a summarized report on the Department’s financial statement audit and its management 

assurances. For more details, the auditors’ report can be found beginning on page 78 and the Department’s management 

assurances on page 21.

SUMMARY OF FINANCIAL STATEMENT AUDIT

Audit Opinion: Unmodified

Restatement: No

Material Weaknesses Beginning Balance New Resolved Consolidated Ending Balance

Total Material Weaknesses 0 0 0 0 0

SUMMARY OF MANAGEMENT ASSURANCES

Effectiveness of Internal Control over Financial Reporting—Federal Managers’ Financial Integrity Act 

(FMFIA) 2

Statement of Assurance: Unmodified

Material 

Weaknesses Beginning Balance New Resolved Consolidated Reassessed Ending Balance

Total Material 

Weaknesses 0 0 0 0 0 0

The Department had no material weaknesses in the design or operation of the internal control over financial reporting.

Effectiveness of Internal Control over Operations—FMFIA 2 

Statement of Assurance: Unmodified

Material 

Weaknesses Beginning Balance New Resolved Consolidated Reassessed Ending Balance

Total Material 

Weaknesses 0 0 0 0 0 0

Conformance with Financial Management System Requirements—FMFIA 4

Statement of Assurance: The Department systems conform to financial management system requirements.

Nonconformances Beginning Balance New Resolved Consolidated Reassessed Ending Balance

Total 

Nonconformances 0 0 0 0 0 0

Compliance with Federal Financial Management Improvement Act (FFMIA)

Agency Auditor

1. System Requirements No lack of compliance noted No lack of compliance noted

2. Federal Accounting Standards No lack of compliance noted No lack of compliance noted

3. United States Standard General Ledger at Transaction Level No lack of compliance noted No lack of compliance noted
#### 13.302 Purchase orders.