alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
TRANSFER OF MINERAL DISPOSITION

I, Thomas E. Mills, of the city of Vancouver in the province of British Columbia
in consideration of the sum of $5,000 CAD, do hereby transfer, assign, set over
and quit claim unto Kingston Mines Ltd., a company incorporated under the laws
of the State of Nevada, all my interest in the following mineral dispositions:

                  British Columbia Mineral Tenure Number 514065
                             (NTS map sheet 921/2E)

I direct that the recorded holder of the dispositions shall be:

                               Kingston Mines Ltd.
                             106-1990 S.E. Kent Ave.
                           Vancouver, British Columbia
                                     V5P 4X5

Dated at Vancouver, British Columbia on August 30, 2005.




                                        /s/ Thomas Mills                  [seal]
                                        Thomas Mills
122 STAT. 2482 PUBLIC LAW 110–264—JULY 15, 2008 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 2728: 

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 110–327 (Comm. on Transportation and Infrastructure). 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD: 

Vol. 153 (2007): Oct. 29, considered and passed House. 

Vol. 154 (2008): June 24, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 110–264 

110th Congress 

An Act 

To designate the station of the United States Border Patrol located at 25762 

Madison Avenue in Murrieta, California, as the ‘‘Theodore L. Newton, Jr. and 

George F. Azrak Border Patrol Station’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

The station of the United States Border Patrol located at 25762 

Madison Avenue in Murrieta, California, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Theodore L. Newton, Jr. and George F. Azrak 

Border Patrol Station’’. 

SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, 

or other record of the United States to the station referred to 

in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Theodore 

L. Newton, Jr. and George F. Azrak Border Patrol Station’’. 

Approved July 15, 2008. 

July 15, 2008 

[H.R. 2728] 


kgrant on POHRRP4G1 with PUBLAW
#### Sidney Frankel et al., Individually and as Stockholders of Rochester Iron and Metal Co., Appellants, v. Rochester Iron and Metal Co. et al., Respondents.

Order modified by inserting a provision therein that the bill of particulars need not be served until 60 days after the completion of the discovery and inspection of the corporate records permitted in the companion case of *Frankel*v. *Rochester Iron & Metal Co.*(16 A D 2d 864) and by further providing that the order is without prejudice to the right of the plaintiffs to move on proper papers within 60 days after the completion of the discovery of the corporate records for relief with respect to specific items of the demand for a bill of particulars if they see fit, and as so modified order unanimously affirmed, without costs of this appeal to any party. Memorandum: In our opinion, the plaintiffs should not be compelled to serve a bill of particulars until after discovery. In fact it might be impossible for plaintiffs to furnish the information required before discovery has been completed. (Appeal from order of Monroe Special Term denying plaintiff’s motion to vacate the demand for a bill of particulars.) Present — Williams, P. J., Halpern, McClusky and Henry, JJ.
#### 14.202-2 [Reserved]
NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION. UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE

.

IN THE 

## A RIZONA 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEALS

D IVISION O NE

STATE OF ARIZONA , Respondent ,

v.
NORMAN SHIGERU SHINSAKO , Petitioner

. No. 1 CA

- CR 18

- 0132 PRPC

Petition for Review from the Superior Court in Yavapai County

No. V1300CR201480437 V1300CR201580196 V1300CR201880006 The Honorable Joseph C. Butner , III, Judge , Pro Tempore The Honorable Jeffre y G. Paupore, Judge, Pro Tempore REVIEW GRANTED; RELI EF DENIED

COUNSEL Yavapai County Attorney's Office , Camp Verde By Patti Marie Wortman Counsel for Respondent

Norman Shigeru Shinsako , Florence Petitioner FILED 7-12-2018STATE v. SHINSAKO Decision of the Court

2 MEMORANDUM DECISION Presiding Judge Diane M. Johnsen, Judge Paul J. McMurdie and Judge David D. Weinzweig delivered the decision of the Court.

PER CURIAM : ¶1 Petitioner Norman Shigeru Shinsako seeks review of the superior court's order denying his petition for post

- conviction relief, filed pursuant to Arizona Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.1. This is petitioner's second petition for post

- conviction relief. ¶2 A bsent an abuse of discretion or error of law, this court will not disturb a superior court's ruling on a petition for post

- conviction relief. State v. Gutierrez , 229 Ariz. 573, 577, ¶ 19 (2012). It is petitioner's burden to show that the superior court a bused its discretion by denying the petition for post

- conviction relief. See State v. Poblete , 227 Ariz. 537, ¶ 1 (App. 2011) (petitioner has burden of establishing abuse of discretion on review). ¶3 We have reviewed the record in this matter, the superior
c ourt's order denying the petition for post

- conviction relief, and the petition for review. Petitioner has not established an abuse of discretion. ¶4 For the foregoing reasons, we grant review and deny relief.
§ 634.16 Reciprocal state-military action. ( a ) Commanders will recognize the interests of the states in matters of POV administration and driver licensing. Statutory authority may exist within some states or host nations for reciprocal suspension and revocation of driving privileges. See subpart D of this part for additional information on exchanging and obtaining information with civilian law enforcement agencies concerning infractions by Armed Service personnel off post. Installation commanders will honor the reciprocal authority and direct the installation law enforcement officer to pursue reciprocity with state or host nation licensing authorities. Upon receipt of written or other official law enforcement communication relative to the suspension/revocation of driving privileges, the receiving installation will terminate driving privileges as if violations occurred within its own jurisdiction.
( b ) When imposing a suspension or revocation for an off-installation offense, the effective date should be the same as civil disposition, or the date that state or host-nation driving privileges are suspended or revoked. This effective date can be retroactive.
( c ) If statutory authority does not exist within the state or host nation for formal military reciprocity, the procedures below will be adopted: ( 1 ) Commanders will recognize official documentation of suspensions/revocations imposed by state or host nation authorities. Administrative actions (suspension/revocations, or if recognized, point assessment) for moving traffic violations off the installation should not be less than required for similar offenses on the installation. When notified by state or host nation authorities of a suspension or revocation, the person's OF 346 may also be suspended.
( 2 ) In CONUS, the host and issuing state licensing authority will be notified as soon as practical when a person's installation driving privileges are suspended or revoked for any period, and immediately for refusal to submit to a lawful BAC test. The notification will be sent to the appropriate state DMV(s) per reciprocal agreements. In the absence of electronic communication technology, the appropriate state DMV(s) will be notified by official certified mail. The notification will include the basis for the suspension/revocation and the BAC level if applicable.
( d ) OCONUS installation commanders must follow provisions of the applicable Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA), the law of the host nation concerning reciprocal suspension and revocation, and other international agreements. To the extent an agreement concerning reciprocity may be permitted at a particular overseas installation, the commander must have prior authorization to negotiate and conclude such an international agreement in accordance with applicable international agreements, DODD 5530.3, International Agreements, June 87, and other individual Service instructions.
#### 1450.102 Delegation of and limitations on exercise of authority.
CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


AND
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The undersigned hereby certify,
pursuant to, and as required by, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of DCAP
Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that information contained in such
Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date:
      November 14, 2008
            /s/ Barry B.
      Goldstein
              Barry
      B. Goldstein
              Chief
      Executive Officer/s/ Victor
      Brodsky
              Victor
      Brodsky
              Chief
      Accounting Officer and
              Principal
      Financial Officer
#### Luana Robinson v. George Treadwell et al.

Motion to dismiss appeal granted, with $10 costs, unless the appellant procures the appellant’s points to be served and filed on or before October 4, 1960, with notice of argument for the November 1960 Term of this court, said appeal to be argued or submitted when reached. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Stevens and Eager, JJ.
**United States Department of Education**

**Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services**

 MEMORANDUM

TO:Commissioner

Rehabilitation Services Administration

FROM:Ruth Ryder

Delegated the duties of the Assistant Secretary for Special Education and Rehabilitative Services

SUBJECT:Re-delegation of Authority

I. DELEGATION

Under the authority vested in me by a delegation from the Secretary, delegation EA/EH/77, certified on June 3, 1999, I hereby redelegate to you, your successor in function, or anyone serving for you in an acting capacity or delegated the authority to perform the functions and duties of your position, the authority to administer the following provisions of law:

A. the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 as amended, 29 U.S.C. 3101 et seq., with the exceptions of  Title II, Title IV, and Sections 501-508 of Title V; and

B. the Randolph-Sheppard Act, as amended, 20 U.S.C. 3101 et seq. 

Unless otherwise noted in future delegations of authority, any amendments to the provisions of law delegated herein are included within the scope of this delegation.

II. RESERVATIONS

Unless otherwise noted in existing or future delegations of authority, the following are not delegated:

A. the authority to sign documents for publication in the Federal Register;

B. the authority to appoint, and fix compensation of, members of advisory councils; and,

C. unless otherwise provided by law, the authority to submit reports to Congress or the President.

III. REDELEGATION

Subject to applicable provisions of law, and unless otherwise noted, you may  re-delegate any of the authorities delegated to you.  All re-delegations must be prepared in accordance with the Administrative Communications System directive, OM:1-102, Delegations of Authority, dated July 26, 2005.

IV. CERTIFICATION AND EFFECTIVE DATE

This delegation is effective upon certification by the Department’s Principal Delegations Control Officer and supersedes all previous delegations of these authorities, including EH/EHR/87.  I hereby ratify actions, within the scope of this delegation, taken by you prior to the date of certification.

___________/s/________________

Ruth Ryder

Delegated the duties of the Assistant Secretary for Special Education and Rehabilitative Services

OGC Clearance and Date:  Debbie Friendly; 4/21/2017

Certified Date: 4/28/2017

Departmental Delegations Control Officer:  Jim Clemmens

Control Number: EH/EHR/104
EXHIBIT 31.2
  CERTIFICATIONS
  I, Geoffrey P. Talbot, certify that:
  1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Statmon Technologies Corp Inc.
  2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
  3 .  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
  4 .  The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
  (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
  (b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
  (c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and
  5.  The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
  (a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
  (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over financial reporting.
  Date: September 13, 2004
   **/s/ **Geoffrey P. Talbot****Geoffrey P. Talbot**Chief Financial Officer**
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 5 (Friday, January 8, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1486-1487]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-00269]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ELECTION ASSISTANCE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

AGENCY: U.S. Election Assistance Commission.

ACTION: Sunshine Act notice; notice of public roundtable agenda.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Roundtable discussion: 2020 Elections lessons learned.

DATES: Wednesday, January 27, 2021, 1:30 p.m.-3:30 p.m. Eastern.

ADDRESSES: 

Virtual via Zoom

    The roundtable discussion is open to the public and will be 
livestreamed on the U.S. Election Assistance Commission YouTube 
Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCpN6i0g2rlF4ITWhwvBwwZw.

[[Page 1487]]


FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kristen Muthig, Telephone: (202) 897-
9285, Email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#771c1a02031f1e103712161459101801"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f19a9c8485999896b1949092df969e87">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    Purpose: In accordance with the Government in the Sunshine Act 
(Sunshine Act), Public Law 94-409, as amended (5 U.S.C. 552b), the U.S. 
Election Assistance Commission (EAC) will conduct a virtual roundtable 
discussion on the lessons learned from the 2020 elections. This event 
will be the first in a series of virtual events with election officials 
addressing the challenges and successes of the 2020 primaries and 
general election.
    Agenda: The U.S. Election Assistance Commission (EAC) will hold a 
roundtable discussion on the lessons learned from the 2020 primaries 
and general election. This roundtable will include state election 
officials, who will offer remarks on their experiences as they 
administered elections throughout the year. Speakers will also answer 
questions from the EAC Commissioners. This is the kickoff event for a 
2020 Elections Lessons Learned. Additional virtual events will be 
announced in early 2021.
    The full agenda will be posted in advance on the EAC website: 
https://www.eac.gov.
    Status: This roundtable discussion will be open to the public.

Amanda Joiner,
Associate Counsel, U.S. Election Assistance Commission.
[FR Doc. 2021-00269 Filed 1-6-21; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<PAGE>

                                                                 Exhibit 10.26.4

(EMERSON LOGO)

EMERSON RADIO CORP. 9 Entin Road, P.O. Box 430, Parsippany, New Jersey
07054-4430 (973) 884-5800

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                               Effective as of September 1, 2004



Mr. John J. Raab
c/o Emerson Radio Corp.
9 Entin Road
Parsippany, New Jersey 07054

                           EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

Dear Mr. Raab:


This letter will serve as confirmation of our agreement that the Employment
Agreement, dated effective as of September l, 2001 (the "Agreement"), by and
between you and Emerson Radio Corp. shall be and hereby is extended through and
including August 31, 2007. The base salary compensation of the Agreement is
presently $275,000.

Except as specifically amended hereby, the terms of the Agreement shall remain
in full force and effect. Please indicate your agreement to the above by signing
in the space provided below.


Very truly yours:

Emerson Radio Corp.

By: /s/ Elizabeth J. Calianese
   -----------------------------
   (Name)                 (Title)              ACKNOWLEDGED, UNDERSTOOD AND
Elizabeth J. Calianese    SVP-HR               AGREED TO AS OF SEPTEMBER 1, 2004

                                               By: /s/ John J. Raab
                                                  -----------------------------
                                                  John J. Raab
* Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions

that have no precedential value and merely decide particular

cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes

needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal

profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-50410

Conference Calendar

__________________

DAVID MEMPHIS CARTER,

 Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

JAMES A. COLLINS, DIRECTOR,

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE,

INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION, REBECKA L. BURKETT,

 

 Defendants-Appellees,

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. W-94-CV-359

- - - - - - - - - -

(October 18, 1995)

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and REAVLEY and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

A Texas prison official denied inmate David Memphis Carter

access to issues of a magazine depicting women engaged in sex

with each other. This court has held that such a denial is not

constitutionally infirm. Thompson v. Patteson, 985 F.2d 202,

206-07 (5th Cir. 1993). Carter has given us no reason to revisit

or limit the holding of Thompson. 
No. 95-50410

-2-

The complaint of a person proceeding in forma pauperis (IFP)

may be dismissed without service of process or discovery. Cay v.

Estelle, 789 F.2d 318, 324 (5th Cir. 1989). The dismissal of

Carter's complaint was not an abuse of discretion. See Eason v.

Thaler, 14 F.3d 8, 9 (5th Cir. 1994).

On motion for leave to appeal IFP, Carter has shown no

nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, we deny IFP and dismiss the

appeal. See Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir.

1983); Carson v. Polley, 689 F.2d 562, 586 (5th Cir. 1982); 5th

Cir. R. 42.2.

We note that the district court imposed sanctions on Carter

and that he does not challenge them on appeal. Issues not raised

on appeal are abandoned. See Hobbs v. Blackburn, 752 F.2d 1079,

1083 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 838 (1985).

IFP DENIED, APPEAL DISMISSED.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

April 24, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
133036 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Plaintiff-Appellee, Stephen J. Markman, Justices v SC: 133036 COA: 274107 Oakland CC: 06-207321-FH PENNY LYNN GORE, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the December 28, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.

s0416 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

April 24, 2007

Clerk
Canisco Resources, Inc.

Schedule II Valuation and Qualifying Accounts

Years ended March 31, 2000, 1999, and 1998


                                   Additions
                     Balance at   charged to                          Balance
                      beginning    operating                        at end of
                      of period      expense     Other   Deductions(2) period


Description

Allowance for
doubtful accounts
deducted from
accounts receivable
in the consolidated
balance sheets:

March 31, 2000         $566,641     $602,655   $     -     $370,030  $799,266
March 31, 1999          137,933      542,551    32,000(1)   145,843   566,641
March 31, 1998          199,050           --        --       61,117   137,933




(1) Reserve acquired in Mansfield acquisition

(2) Write off of uncollectible accounts





Exhibit 99.3