alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### 1319.705-4 Reviewing the subcontracting plan.

The prime contractor's proposed subcontracting plan shall be reviewed by the contracting officer for adequacy, ensuring that the required information, goals, and assurances are included. The contracting officer may obtain advice and recommendations from the SBA procurement center representative, the contracting activity's small business specialist and the DOC OSDBU. The CO shall give the reviewers sufficient time and information to review the plan and ask questions.
#### 15.204-3 Part II—Contract Clauses.

*Section I, Contract clauses.* The contracting officer shall include in this section the clauses required by law or by this part and any additional clauses expected to be included in any resulting contract, if these clauses are not required in any other section of the uniform contract format. An index may be inserted if this section's format is particularly complex.
#### In the Matter of the Probate of the Will of Florence Salkind, Deceased. Robert C. Salkind, Appellant; Seymour Finkelstein, Respondent.

Motion by respondent to dismiss appeal: (a) from so much of a decree of the Surrogate’s Court, Kings County, entered June 6, 1960, as fixes certain fees and apportions their payment; and (b) from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated November 3, 1960, entered in the Surrogate’s Court on November 4, 1960, which settles the record on the appeal from the decree by allowing all of respondent’s proposed amendments and by including therein certain exhibits. Motion denied. Cross motion by appellant to dispense with printing on his appeal from said order of November 3, 1960, settling the record, granted on condition that such appeal be perfected and argued or submitted at the March Term, beginning February 27, 1961. The appeal is ordered on the calendar for said term. The appeal will be heard on the original papers and on typewritten briefs of both parties. Appellant is directed, on or before February 10, 1961, to file six copies of his brief and to serve one copy on the respondent. Respondent shall file and serve the same number of copies of his brief. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Kleinfeld, Christ and Pette, JJ., concur.
§ 634.37 Voluntary breath and bodily fluid testing based on implied consent. ( a ) Implied consent policy is explained in § 634.8.
( b ) Tests may be administered only if the following conditions are met: ( 1 ) The person was lawfully stopped while driving, operating, or in actual physical control of a motor vehicle on the installation.
( 2 ) Reasonable suspicion exists to believe that the person was driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs.
( 3 ) A request was made to the person to consent to the tests combined with a warning that failure to voluntarily submit to or complete a chemical test of bodily fluids or breath will result in the revocation of driving privileges.
( c ) As stated in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section, the law enforcement official relying on implied consent will warn the person that driving privileges will be revoked if the person fails to voluntarily submit to or complete a requested chemical test. The person does not have the right to have an attorney present before stating whether he or she will submit to a test, or during the actual test. Installation commanders will prescribe the type or types of chemical tests to be used. Testing will follow policies and procedures in § 634.35. The results of chemical tests conducted under the implied consent provisions of this part may be used as evidence in courts-martial, nonjudicial proceedings under Article 15 of the UCMJ, administrative actions, and civilian courts.
( d ) Special rules exist for persons who have hemophilia, other blood-clotting disorders, or any medical or surgical disorder being treated with an anticoagulant. These persons— ( 1 ) May refuse a blood extraction test without penalty.
( 2 ) Will not be administered a blood extraction test to determine alcohol or other drug concentration or presence under this part.
( 3 ) May be given breath or urine tests, or both.
( e ) If a person suspected of intoxicated driving refuses to submit to a chemical test, a test will not be administered except as specified in § 634.38.
CANISCO RESOURCES, INC.

            SCHEDULE II Valuation and Qualifying Accounts

         March 31, 1998, 1997 and 1996 and September 30, 1995


                               Additions
                   Balance at  charged to                     Balance
                   Beginning   operating                     at end of
                   Of period   expense     Other  Deductions   Period

Description

Allowance for
doubtful 
accounts
deducted from
accounts 
receivable
in the 
consolidated
balance sheets:

March 31, 1998      $199,050      --        --      $61,117    $137,933
March 31, 1997       760,965   265,360      --      827,275     199,050
March 31, 1996       584,941   233,121      --       58,097     760,965
September 30, 1995   784,330   572,096      --      770,485(1)  585,941


(1)  Write-off of uncollectible accounts.


                              Exhibit 99.3
#### Gerald R. Faulkner et al. *v.*Planning and Zoning Commission of the Town of East Hartford et al.

*Edward G. Wynne,*in support of the petition.

*Francis G. Vignati*and *Lester 8. Fleish,*in opposition.

Submitted January 17

decided January 29, 1975

The plaintiffs’ petition for certification for appeal from the Court of Common Pleas in Hartford County is denied.
Exhibit 24





PPL CORPORATION



2002 ANNUAL REPORT

TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

ON FORM 10-K



POWER OF ATTORNEY

The undersigned directors of PPL Corporation, a Pennsylvania
  corporation, that is to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission, Washington,
  D.C., under the provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
  its 2002 Annual Report on Form 10-K, do hereby appoint each of William F.
  Hecht, John R. Biggar and Robert J. Grey their true and lawful attorney,
  with power to act without the other and with full power of substitution and
  resubstitution, to execute for them and in their names said Form 10-K Report
  and any and all amendments thereto, whether said amendments add to, delete from
  or otherwise alter said Form 10-K Report, or add or withdraw any exhibits
  or schedules to be filed therewith and any and all instruments in connection
  therewith. The undersigned hereby grant to each said attorney full power and
  authority to do and perform in the name of and on behalf of the undersigned,
  and in any and all capacities, any act and thing whatsoever required or necessary
  to be done in and about the premises, as fully and to all intents and purposes
  as the undersigned might do, hereby ratifying and approving the acts of each
  of the said attorneys.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have hereunto set their
  hands and seals this 28th day of February, 2003.



|/s/ Frederick M. Bernthal | L.S. | /s/ Stuart Heydt        | L.S.
|------------------------- | ---- | ----------------------- | ----
|Frederick M. Bernthal     |      | Stuart Heydt            |     
|                          |      |                         |     
|                          |      |                         |     
|/s/ John W. Conway        | L.S. | /s/ W. Keith Smith      | L.S.
|John W. Conway            |      | W. Keith Smith          |     
|                          |      |                         |     
|                          |      |                         |     
|/s/ E. Allen Deaver       | L.S. | /s/ Susan M. Stalnecker | L.S.
|E. Allen Deaver           |      | Susan M. Stalnecker     |
U.S. Department of

Transportation

Office of the Secretary

of Transportation

DEPARTMENT ACTION ON APPLICATION IN DOCKET DOT-OST-2013-0094

(Filed May 3, 2013)

Application of EVA Airways Corporation (EVA) for a statement of authorization to display the 

(FX*) designator code of Federal Express Corporation (FedEx) and block cargo space to FedEx on 

EVA flights between Taipei and Seattle, and between Taipei and Los Angeles. 

The applicant further requests a waiver of the 45-day advance filing requirement under 14 CFR 

Part 212.

 * Approved under assigned authority (14 CFR §385.13).

 Date of Action: May 14, 20131

This action is subject to the conditions attached. Persons entitled to petition the Department for review of 

this action under the Department’s regulations, 14 CFR §385.30, should file their petitions within seven 

days of the date of this action. This action is effective immediately, and the filing of a petition for review 

will not alter its effectiveness.

An electronic version of this document is available on the World Wide Web at

http://www.regulations.gov

 1 The Department is acting on the request prior to the expiration of the seven-day answer period with the consent of 

all parties served.
The operations authorized here are subject to the following conditions:

(a) The statement of authorization will remain in effect only as long as (i) EVA and FedEx continue to 

hold the necessary underlying authority to operate the code-share/blocked space services at issue, and (ii) 

the agreement providing for the code-share/blocked space operations remains in effect.

(b) EVA and/or FedEx must promptly notify the Department if the agreement providing for the codeshare/blocked space operations is no longer effective or if the carriers decide to cease operating all or a 

portion of the approved code-share/blocked space services. Such notices should be filed in Docket DOTOST-2013-0094.

1

(c) Notwithstanding any provisions in the contract between the carriers, our approval here is expressly 

conditioned upon the requirements that the subject foreign air transportation be sold in the name of the 

carrier holding out such service in the computer reservation systems and elsewhere; that the carrier selling 

such transportation (i.e., the carrier shown on the waybill) accept responsibility for the entirety of the 

code-share journey for all obligations established in its contract of carriage with the shipper; that the 

cargo liability of the operating carrier be unaffected.

(d) The authority granted here is specifically conditioned so that neither EVA nor FedEx shall give any 

force or effect to any contractual provisions between themselves that are contrary to these conditions.

(e) We may amend, modify, or revoke the authority granted at any time without hearing at our discretion.

 1 We expect this notification to be received within ten (10) days after such non-effectiveness or of such decision.
EXHIBIT 32.2
         Certification of the Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 18
             U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
                        of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with this quarterly report of Espey Mfg. & Electronics  Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended  September 30, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof,  I, David A. O'Neil,
Principal  Financial  Officer of the  Company,  certify,  pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that to my knowledge:

      1.    The report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The  information  contained in this report fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

Date: November 10, 2005


                                       /s/David O'Neil
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       David O'Neil
                                       Treasurer and Principal Financial Officer



                                       19
#### 1401.201 Maintenance of the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR).
Exhibit 10(q)-2



AMENDMENT NO. 2

TO

PPL CORPORATION

DIRECTORS DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN

WHEREAS, PP&L, Inc. ("PP&L") adopted the Pennsylvania
  Power & Light Company Directors Deferred Compensation Plan ("Plan") effective
  January 26, 1972; and

WHEREAS, the Plan was most recently amended and restated effective
  July 1, 2000, and subsequently amended by Amendment No. 1; and

WHEREAS, the Company desires to further amend the Plan;

NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows:

I. Effective January 1, 2004, Paragraph 5(b) is amended to
  read:

5.Mandatory Deferral.

(b)   A Participant may not convert any portion
  of such Participant's Stock Account attributable to the Mandatory Deferral Amount
  or dividends thereon, as described in Paragraph 7.1(c), to the Participant's
  Cash Account for a period of 3 years from the date such Mandatory Deferral Amount
  was credited to the Participant's Stock Account. Notwithstanding the above,
  any portion of a Participant's Stock Account attributable to an award of Stock
  Units granted by the Committee that must remain in Stock Units by its terms
  shall not be converted to a Participant's Cash Account until such time as is
  authorized by the Committee.

II.   Except as provided for in this Amendment
  No. 2, all other provisions of the Plan shall remain in full force and effect.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment No. 2 is executed this _____
  day of December, 2003.



| | EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLAN BOARD OF
        PPL CORPORATION                                                                            
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |                                                                                                                                   
| | By: __________________________________
              T. W. Hatten
              Chairman
              Employee Benefit Plan Board
# GA Volume 2nd Quarter

# Quarterly

# Historical
###### Editorial Note on Subpart 1052.2 of Part 1052

#### Editorial Note:

At 79 FR 15554, Mar. 20, 2014, subpart 1052.2 was added, however, the amendment could not be incorporated due to inaccurate amendatory instruction.

#### 1052.210-70 Contractor publicity.

As prescribed in 1009.204-70, insert the following clause:

# Contractor Publicity (APR 2015)

The Contractor, or any entity or representative acting on behalf of the Contractor, shall not refer to the supplies or services furnished pursuant to the provisions of this contract in any news release or commercial advertising, or in connection with any news release or commercial advertising, without first obtaining explicit written consent to do so from the Contracting Officer. Should any reference to such supplies or services appear in any news release or commercial advertising issued by or on behalf of the Contractor without the required consent, the Government shall consider institution of all remedies available under applicable law, including 31 U.S.C. 333, and this contract. Further, any violation of this clause may be considered as part of the evaluation of past performance.

(End of clause)

[80 FR 11596, Mar. 4, 2015]
### §205. Removal of cases from State courts

Where the subject matter of an action or proceeding pending in a State court relates to an arbitration agreement or award falling under the Convention, the defendant or the defendants may, at any time before the trial thereof, remove such action or proceeding to the district court of the United States for the district and division embracing the place where the action or proceeding is pending. The procedure for removal of causes otherwise provided by law shall apply, except that the ground for removal provided in this section need not appear on the face of the complaint but may be shown in the petition for removal. For the purposes of Chapter 1 of this title any action or proceeding removed under this section shall be deemed to have been brought in the district court to which it is removed.

(Added Pub. L. 91–368, §1, July 31, 1970, 84 Stat. 692.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective upon the entry into force of the Convention on Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards with respect to the United States (Dec. 29, 1970), see section 4 of Pub. L. 91–368, set out as a note under section 201 of this title.
#### 1552.215-70--1552.215-71 [Reserved]
### §1501. Certificate of diplomatic or consular officer of United States as to loss of American nationality

Whenever a diplomatic or consular officer of the United States has reason to believe that a person while in a foreign state has lost his United States nationality under any provision of part III of this subchapter, or under any provision of chapter IV of the Nationality Act of 1940, as amended, he shall certify the facts upon which such belief is based to the Department of State, in writing, under regulations prescribed by the Secretary of State. If the report of the diplomatic or consular officer is approved by the Secretary of State, a copy of the certificate shall be forwarded to the Attorney General, for his information, and the diplomatic or consular office in which the report was made shall be directed to forward a copy of the certificate to the person to whom it relates. Approval by the Secretary of State of a certificate under this section shall constitute a final administrative determination of loss of United States nationality under this chapter, subject to such procedures for administrative appeal as the Secretary may prescribe by regulation, and also shall constitute a denial of a right or privilege of United States nationality for purposes of section 1503 of this title.

(June 27, 1952, ch. 477, title III, ch. 4, §358, 66 Stat. 272; Pub. L. 103–416, title I, §106, Oct. 25, 1994, 108 Stat. 4309.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Chapter IV of the Nationality Act of 1940, as amended, referred to in text, which was classified to sections 800 to 810 of this title, was repealed by section 403(a)(42) of act June 27, 1952.

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original, "this Act", meaning act June 27, 1952, ch. 477, 66 Stat. 163, known as the Immigration and Nationality Act, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1101 of this title and Tables.

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 100 of this title.

#### Amendments

1994—Pub. L. 103–416 inserted at end "Approval by the Secretary of State of a certificate under this section shall constitute a final administrative determination of loss of United States nationality under this chapter, subject to such procedures for administrative appeal as the Secretary may prescribe by regulation, and also shall constitute a denial of a right or privilege of United States nationality for purposes of section 1503 of this title."

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Abolition of Immigration and Naturalization Service and Transfer of Functions

For abolition of Immigration and Naturalization Service, transfer of functions, and treatment of related references, see note set out under section 1551 of this title.
1316.307 Contract clauses. ( a ) Insert a clause that is substantially the same as 1352.216-70, *Estimated and Allowable Costs,* in all cost-reimbursement contracts.
( b ) Insert a clause similar to 1352.216-71, *Level of Effort (Cost-Plus-Fixed-Fee, Term Contract),* in Cost-Plus-Fixed-Fee, Level of Effort contracts.
#### In the Matter of Putnam Theatrical Corp.

Appeal dismissed unless appellant’s briefs are filed and served on or before September 29, 1960. Respondent’s brief must be filed on or before October 6, 1960 if appeal is to be argued at October 1960 Term.
14.408-4 Economic price adjustment. ( a ) *Bidder proposes economic price adjustment.* ( 1 ) When a solicitation does not contain an economic price adjustment clause but a bidder proposes one with a ceiling that the price will not exceed, the bid shall be evaluated on the basis of the maximum possible economic price adjustment of the quoted base price.
( 2 ) If the bid is eligible for award, the contracting officer shall request the bidder to agree to the inclusion in the award of an approved economic price adjustment clause (see 16.203) that is subject to the same ceiling. If the bidder will not agree to an approved clause, the award may be made on the basis of the bid as originally submitted.
( 3 ) Bids that contain economic price adjustments with no ceiling shall be rejected unless a clear basis for evaluation exists.
( b ) *Government proposes economic price adjustment.* ( 1 ) When an invitation contains an economic price adjustment clause and no bidder takes exception to the provisions, bids shall be evaluated on the basis of the quoted prices without the allowable economic price adjustment being added.
( 2 ) When a bidder increases the maximum percentage of economic price adjustment stipulated in the invitation or limits the downward economic price adjustment provisions of the invitation, the bid shall be rejected as nonresponsive.
( 3 ) When a bid indicates deletion of the economic price adjustment clause, the bid shall be rejected as nonresponsive since the downward economic price adjustment provisions are thereby limited.
( 4 ) When a bidder decreases the maximum percentage of economic price adjustment stipulated in the invitation, the bid shall be evaluated at the base price on an equal basis with bids that do not reduce the stipulated ceiling. However, after evaluation, if the bidder offering the lower ceiling is in a position to receive the award, the award shall reflect the lower ceiling.
[48 FR 42171, Sept. 19, 1983. Redesignated at 60 FR 34738, July 3, 1995]
Exhibit 32.1

BULOVA TECHNOLOGIES GROUP, INC. AND CONSOLIDATED AFFILIATE

Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Bulova Technologies Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, Stephen L. Gurba, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Stephen L. GurbaStephen L. GurbaPrincipal Executive OfficerNovember 16, 2010
§ 989.35 Reporting requirements. ( a ) EAs, EISs, and mitigation measures will be tracked at bases and MAJCOMs through an appropriate environmental management system.
( b ) Proponents, EPFs, and public affairs offices may utilize the World Wide Web, in addition to more traditional means, to notify the public of availability of EAs and EISs. When possible, allow distribution of documents electronically. Public review comments should be required in writing, rather than by electronic mail.
( c ) All documentation will be disposed of according to AFMAN 37-139, Records Disposition Schedule.[12]
[64 FR 38129, July 15, 1999; 66 FR 16869, Mar. 28, 2001] Footnotes -
989.35
[12] See footnote 1 to § 989.1.