alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### 1252.239-84 Media Transport.

As prescribed in 1239.7204(i), insert a clause substantially as follows:

# Media Transport (NOV 2022)

(a) The Contractor shall document activities associated with the transport of DOT information stored on digital and non-digital media and employ cryptographic mechanisms to protect the confidentiality and integrity of this information during transport outside of controlled areas. This applies to—

(1) Digital media containing DOT or other Federal agency or other sensitive or third-party provided information that requires protection must be encrypted using FIPS 140-2 [*Contracting Officer insert required encryption mode, based on FIPS 199 risk category*] when transported outside of controlled areas; and

(2) Nondigital media must be secured using the same policies and procedures as paper.

(b) Contractors shall ensure accountability for media containing DOT or other Federal agency or other sensitive or third-party provided information that is transported outside of controlled areas. This can be accomplished through appropriate actions such as logging and a documented chain of custody form.

(c) DOT or other Federal agency sensitive or third-party provided information that resides on mobile/portable devices (*e.g.,* USB flash drives, external hard drives, and SD cards) must be encrypted using FIPS 140-2 [*Contracting Officer insert the required encryption mode based on FIPS 199 risk category*]. All Federal agency data residing on laptop computing devices must be protected with NIST-approved encryption software.

(End of clause)
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6938

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JAMES HENRY EDWARDS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CR93-269-S)

Submitted: November 20, 1997 Decided: December 10, 1997

Before MURNAGHAN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Henry Edwards, Appellant Pro Se. John Francis Purcell, Jr.,

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his

motion for return of property. We have reviewed the record and the

district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v.

Edwards, No. CR-93-269-S (D. Md. June 27, 1997). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 9 (Thursday, January 14, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 3226]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-00619]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 11307]


Review of the Designations as Foreign Terrorist Organizations of 
Lashkar-e-Tayyiba (and Other Aliases); Jaysh Rijal al-Tariq al 
Naqshabandi (and Other Aliases); Jama'atu Ansarul Muslimina Fi Biladis-
Sudan (Ansaru and Other Aliases); Harakat ul-Mujahidin (and Other 
Aliases); al-Nusrah Front (and Other Aliases); Popular Front for the 
Liberation of Palestine (and Other Aliases); Continuity Irish 
Republican Army (and Other Aliases); and the National Liberation Army 
(and Other Aliases)

    Based upon a review of the Administrative Records assembled 
pursuant to Section 219(a)(4)(C) of the Immigration and Nationality 
Act, as amended (8 U.S.C. 1189(a)(4)(C)) (``INA''), and in consultation 
with the Attorney General and the Secretary of the Treasury, I conclude 
that the circumstances that were the bases for the designations of the 
aforementioned organizations as Foreign Terrorist Organizations have 
not changed in such a manner as to warrant revocation of the 
designations and that the national security of the United States does 
not warrant a revocation of the designations.
    Therefore, I hereby determine that the designations of the 
aforementioned organizations as Foreign Terrorist Organizations, 
pursuant to Section 219 of the INA (8 U.S.C. 1189), shall be 
maintained.
    This determination shall be published in the Federal Register.

    Dated: December 22, 2020.
Michael R. Pompeo,
Secretary of State.
[FR Doc. 2021-00619 Filed 1-13-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-AD-P
#### In the Matter of Jacqueline B., Respondent, v Norman E.G., Appellant.

(Appeal No. 1.)

[833 NYS2d 422]

Motion for re-argument or leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied. Present—Hurlbutt, J.P., Martoche, Centra, Fahey and Green, JJ.
### §3508. Definitions

For purposes of this chapter—

(1) the term "agricultural land" means any land located in one or more States and used for agricultural, forestry, or timber production purposes as determined by the Secretary under regulations to be prescribed by the Secretary;

(2) the term "foreign government" means any government other than the Federal Government or any government of a State or a political subdivision of a State;

(3) the term "foreign person" means—

(A) any individual—

(i) who is not a citizen or national of the United States;

(ii) who is not a citizen of the Northern Mariana Islands or the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands; or

(iii) who is not lawfully admitted to the United States for permanent residence, or paroled into the United States, under the Immigration and Nationality Act [8 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.];

(B) any person, other than an individual or a government, which is created or organized under the laws of a foreign government or which has its principal place of business located outside of all the States;

(C) any person, other than an individual or a government—

(i) which is created or organized under the laws of any State; and

(ii) in which, as determined by the Secretary under regulations which the Secretary shall prescribe, a significant interest or substantial control is directly or indirectly held—

(I) by any individual referred to in subparagraph (A);

(II) by any person referred to in subparagraph (B);

(III) by any foreign government; or

(IV) by any combination of such individuals, persons, or governments; and

(D) any foreign government;

(4) the term "person" includes any individual, corporation, company, association, firm, partnership, society, joint stock company, trust, estate, or any other legal entity;

(5) the term "Secretary" means the Secretary of Agriculture; and

(6) the term "State" means any of the several States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Northern Mariana Islands, Guam, the Virgin Islands, American Samoa, the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands, or any other territory or possession of the United States.

(Pub. L. 95–460, §9, Oct. 14, 1978, 92 Stat. 1266.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Immigration and Nationality Act, referred to in par. (3)(A)(iii), is act June 27, 1952, ch. 477, 66 Stat. 163, which is classified principally to chapter 12 (§1101 et seq.) of Title 8, Aliens and Nationality. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1101 of Title 8 and Tables.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Termination of Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands

For termination of Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands, see note set out preceding section 1681 of Title 48, Territories and Insular Possessions.
#### 14.201 Preparation of invitations for bids.
##### 



Exhibit 31.1
 
      a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andd)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 September 6, 2006
    /s/ Marla L. SchaeferMarla L. SchaeferCo-Chief Executive Officer
INL CAPABILITY 

Technology Roadmapping,  Maturity, and Deployment 

 lanning and decision-making represent important challenges in the realm of technology development programs.  Whether projects involve incremental improvement or technology breakthrough, there typically are significant uncertainties and interrelationships which complicate the environment of competing priorities and limited 

funding.  Technology Roadmaps are used to identify precise program and project objectives and requirements, create a consensus vision of R&D needs, focus R&D resources, facilitate informed decision making, provide a structured defensible decision program and project plan, accelerate application of new technologies, expedite new systems deployment, and minimize project costs and schedules.  Building on core roadmapping principles that have guided Fortune 500 companies like Intel and Motorola, systems engineers at the Idaho National Laboratory (INL) have developed a specialized planning and technology roadmapping capability that provides the rigor and understanding needed for decision-makers to focus on critical uncertainties and make informed decisions.  Further, the INL’s advanced technology roadmapping process provides a means to measure the relative merit of technologies, accelerate application of new technologies, minimize project costs and schedules, facilitate informed decision-making, and provide a defensible argument for acquisition choices.  In short, the INL technology roadmapping capability allows planning; Research, Development, Test and Evaluation (RDT&E); and acquisition teams to make cost-effective technology decisions in the face of program complexities. 

Technical Contacts  

Ron Klingler (208) 526-0183 ron.klingler@inl.gov  Lori Braase (208) 526-7763 lori.braase@inl.gov  Robert Caliva (208) 526-4653 robert.caliva@inl.gov  John Collins (208) 526-3372 john.collins@inl.gov  Web Page http://www.inl.gov/syseng  

P 

“The INL's roadmapping process gave us the ability to look forward in our technology development and selection processes in a very deliberate manner.  It has provided insight into risk areas and has allowed us to explore requirement gaps that will help us prioritize the activities necessary to develop reasoned decisions with a technical basis that we could not previously articulate.”   

– Colonel Donald Kotchman Deputy Program Executive Officer  U.S. Army Ground Combat Systems 

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2023-07-14T02:20:55-0400
      - Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401
      - Government Publishing Office
      - Government Publishing Office attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by Government Publishing Office
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

        In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Ethyl
Corporation ("the Company") for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
David A. Fiorenza, principal financial officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

        (1)     the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

        (2)     the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

By: /s/ D. A. Fiorenza
   -------------------
David A. Fiorenza
Principal Financial Officer
May 9, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Ethyl Corporation and will be
retained by Ethyl Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
### §2268. Public lands; relinquishment

Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Secretary of Agriculture may, whenever he considers it desirable, relinquish to a State all or part of the legislative jurisdiction of the United States over lands or interests under his control in that State. Relinquishment of legislative jurisdiction under this section may be accomplished (1) by filing with the Governor of the State concerned a notice of relinquishment to take effect upon acceptance thereof, or (2) as the laws of the State may otherwise provide.

(Pub. L. 95–441, Oct. 10, 1978, 92 Stat. 1064.)
### §§5501 to 5505. Repealed. Pub. L. 105–185, title III, §302(c), June 23, 1998, 112 Stat. 563

Section 5501, Pub. L. 101–624, title XIV, §1481, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 3622; Pub. L. 104–127, title VIII, §831, Apr. 4, 1996, 110 Stat. 1168, set forth short title and purpose of chapter, provided definitions, and authorized appropriations.

Section 5502, Pub. L. 101–624, title XIV, §1482, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 3622, related to soil and water activities.

Section 5503, Pub. L. 101–624, title XIV, §1483, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 3623; Pub. L. 102–237, title II, §201(e), Dec. 13, 1991, 105 Stat. 1847, required establishment of water quality coordination program within each State.

Section 5504, Pub. L. 101–624, title XIV, §1484, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 3624, established water quality and nutrient management research program.

Section 5505, Pub. L. 101–624, title XIV, §1485, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 3626; Pub. L. 102–237, title II, §201(f), Dec. 13, 1991, 105 Stat. 1847; Pub. L. 104–66, title I, §1011(r), Dec. 21, 1995, 109 Stat. 710, directed establishment of repository of agriculture and ground water quality planning information.
### §450j. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 450j was editorially reclassified as section 4551 of this title.
<PAGE>

                                   EXHIBIT 10(a)(a)

       Further Amendment to 1992 Incentive and Non-Statutory Stock Option Plan




<PAGE>

                                   AMENDMENT NO. 4
                                        TO THE
                                MICRO BIO-MEDICS, INC.
                           1992 INCENTIVE AND NON-STATUTORY
                            STOCK OPTION PLAN (the "Plan")




     Paragraph 3 of the 1992 Plan is amended to read as follows:

     "3.  STOCK SUBJECT TO PLAN.

     Subject to the provisions of paragraph 12 hereof, there shall be reserved
for issuance or transfer upon the exercise of Options to be granted from time
to time Under the Plan an aggregate of 1,850,000 shares of Common Stock, which
shares may be in whole or in part, as the Board of Directors of the Company
shall from time to time determine, authorized and unissued shares of Common
Stock or issued shares of Stock which shall have been reacquired by the
Company. If any Option granted under the Plan shall expire or terminate for
any reason without having been exercised in full, the unpurchased shares
subject thereto shall again be available for the purposes of the Plan."
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 September 5, 2014

t0825

Order 

Clerk

September 5, 2014

148551

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 148551

COA: 310550 

Branch CC: 10-109467-FC

JAMES CHARLES WILCOX,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 26, 2013 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, it appearing to this Court that the 

case of People v Lockridge (Docket No. 149073) is pending on appeal before this Court 

and that the decision in that case may resolve an issue raised in the present application for 

leave to appeal, we ORDER that the application be held in ABEYANCE pending the 

decision in that case.
# GA_Loan_Volume

# Historical

# Quarterly
#### Frank J. Smithie, appellee, v. Mack-International Motor Truck Corporation, appellant.

Gen. No. 29,479.

Action to recover sum paid to defendant under duress. Judgment for plaintiff. Appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. William R. Fetzer, Judge, presiding. Heard in the second division of this court for the first district at the October term, 1924.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed March 3, 1925.

Adams, Pollansbee, Hawley & Shorey, for appellant.

Marshall-E. Gallion, for appellee.

Mr. Presiding Justice Fitch

delivered the opinion of the court.
### §511c. Demonstration of official standards; samples; cost

The Secretary is authorized to demonstrate the official standards; to prepare and distribute, upon request, samples, illustrations, or sets thereof; and to make reasonable charges therefore: Provided, That in no event shall charges be in excess of the cost of said samples, illustrations, and services so rendered.

(Aug. 23, 1935, ch. 623, §4, 49 Stat. 732.)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                       2,219,145
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,379,430
<ALLOWANCES>                                    45,000
<INVENTORY>                                    643,474
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,258,151
<PP&E>                                         660,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 297,258
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,263,823
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,490,749
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       392,934
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,315,638
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,263,823
<SALES>                                      6,984,752
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             9,976,536
<CGS>                                        6,202,716
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,795,603
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,340,996
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                30,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              93,794
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (275,198)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (275,198)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 200,793
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (74,405)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.01)
        

</TABLE>
### §6408. Permissive terms

#### (a) In general

Each order issued under this chapter may contain one or more of the terms and conditions described in this section.

#### (b) Advertising

The order may provide for the establishment, issuance, effectuation, and administration of appropriate programs or projects for the advertising of fluid milk products and the use of funds collected under this chapter for such programs or projects.

#### (c) Research and development

The order may provide for establishing and carrying out research projects and studies to support the advertising efforts for fluid milk products, and the use of funds collected under the order for such projects and studies.

#### (d) Reserve funds

The order may provide authority to accumulate reserve funds from assessments collected pursuant to the order, to permit an effective and continuous coordinated program of research and advertising in years when the assessment income may be reduced, except that the total reserve fund may not exceed 25 percent of the amount budgeted for the operation in the current fiscal year of the order.

#### (e) Other terms

The order may contain such other terms and conditions incidental to and not inconsistent with the terms and conditions specified in this chapter as are necessary to effectuate the other provisions of the order.

(Pub. L. 101–624, title XIX, §1999I, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 3920.)
---

---

EXHIBIT 13.(a).1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of Scailex Corporation Ltd. (the Company) on
Form 20-F for the period ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned hereby
certifies that to the best of his knowledge:

1.       
          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       
          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: June 19, 2007

| |  | /s/ Yahel Shachar
Yahel ShacharChief Executive Officer
| |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------



---

---
#### BACHMAN BREWING CO. v. WALLOWITZ.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

October 22, 1903.)

Ac*1118tion by the Bachman Brewing Company against Fanny Wallowitz.

No opinion. Default opened, and case submitted.