alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.

SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Wayne J. Conner, Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
of Elgin National Industries, Inc., certify that:



| | 3. | This quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Elgin National Industries, Inc. fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 4. | The information contained in this quarterly report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Elgin National Industries, Inc.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/    WAYNE J. CONNERWayne J. ConnerVice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer




Date: August 5, 2005
#### In the Matter of Siegfried Konig, Individually and as President of Magistrates Court Clerks Association, et al., Appellants, v. Abraham M. Bloch, as Chief City Magistrate of the Magistrates’ Court of the City of New York, Respondent.

Order entered on September 30,1959 as resettled by order entered on March 24, 1960, unanimously affirmed, on the law and on the facts, without costs. Intrinsically, the resettled order represents judicial acceptance and approval of the stipulation twice made in affidavits by the Chief Magistrate dated October 27, 1959 and later repeated in open court, that he would grant petitioners the benefits of the leave regulations promulgated by the Board of Estimate on June 15, 1956, without conceding “that they are entitled to any judicial pronouncement that their rights arise” from that source. Order entered on December 10, 1958, as dismisses the second cause of action in the petition, unanimously affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Concur — Botein, P. J., Rabin, McNally, Stevens and Eager, JJ.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

IRON WORKERS’ MID-AMERICA )

PENSION PLAN, et al., )

)

Plaintiffs, ) CIVIL ACTION

)

vs. ) NO. 12 C 0077

)

DIMENSIONAL TECHNOLOGY, INC., ) JUDGE JOAN H. LEFKOW

an Illinois corporation, )

)

Defendant. )

MOTION FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT AND JUDGMENT

NOW COME Plaintiffs, bytheir attorneys, and move for entryof judgment bydefault against

Defendant, DIMENSIONAL TECHNOLOGY, INC., an Illinois corporation, in the total amount of

$42,449.77, plus Plaintiffs’ court costs and reasonable attorneys’ fees in the amount of $1,317.75. 

On January 9, 2012, the Summons and Complaint was served on the Registered Agent by

tendering a copy of said documents to her at her place of business (a copy of the Summons and

Affidavit of Service is attached hereto). Therefore, Defendant’s answer was due on January 30,

2012. As Defendant has failed to timely answer the Complaint, Plaintiffs respectfully request entry

of default and judgment.

/s/ Patrick N. Ryan 

Patrick N. Ryan

Attorney for Plaintiffs

BAUM SIGMAN AUERBACH & NEUMAN, LTD.

200 West Adams Street, Suite 2200

Chicago, IL 60606-5231

Bar No.: 6278364

Telephone: (312) 236-4316

Facsimile: (312) 236-0241

E-Mail: pryan@baumsigman.com
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned, an attorney of record, hereby certifies that he electronically filed the

foregoing document (Motion) with the Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system, and further

certifies that I have mailed the above-referenced document by United States Mail to the following

non-CM/ECF participant on or before the hour of 5:00 p.m. this 7th day of February 2012:

Dena M. Basselen, Registered Agent/President

Dimensional Technology, Inc.

6717 Linden Lane

Huntley, IL 60142

/s/ Patrick N. Ryan 

Patrick N. Ryan

Attorney for Plaintiffs

BAUM SIGMAN AUERBACH & NEUMAN, LTD.

200 West Adams Street, Suite 2200

Chicago, IL 60606-5231

Bar No.: 6278364

Telephone: (312) 236-4316

Facsimile: (312) 236-0241

E-Mail: pryan@baumsigman.com

I:\MIDJ\Dimensional Technology\#23744\motion.pnr.df.wpd
### §727a. Repealed. Feb. 29, 1952, ch. 49, §3, 66 Stat. 10

Section, act May 3, 1940, ch. 183, §2, 54 Stat. 178, related to patriotic address to new citizens. See section 1448a of this title.
#### Ingrid Pettersen, Respondent, v. Salvation Army, Inc., Appellant.

. In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated June 13, 1960, which denies its motion to dismiss the complaint on the ground that it fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Kleinfeld, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                          0000032284
<NAME>                                         Orion Diversified Technologies

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              APR-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 MAY-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   JAN-31-1998
<CASH>                                              0
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    0
<PP&E>                                              0
<DEPRECIATION>                                      0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         129,312
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                       18,469
<OTHER-SE>                                   (147,781)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        0
<SALES>                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    0
<CGS>                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              104,581
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                32,884
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 0
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                   32,884
<EPS-BASIC>                                       .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .02



</TABLE>
<PAGE>
			  AMENDMENT NO. 1

			       TO

		PENNSYLVANIA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY

	       DIRECTORS DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN

	WHEREAS, Pennsylvania Power & Light Company ("Company") has 
adopted the Pennsylvania Power & Light Company Directors Deferred 
Compensation Plan ("Plan") effective January 26, 1972; and
	WHEREAS, the Plan was amended and restated effective April 
26, 1995; and
	WHEREAS, the Company desires to further amend the Plan;
	NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows:
  I.   Effective January 1, 1997, Article 11(b) is deleted and 
the following sections of Articles II and XI are amended 
to read:
2.  Definitions.

	(d)  "Committee" means two or more directors, who have been 
designated by the Board to act as the Committee and who qualify 
as "non-employee directors," under the rules of the Securities 
and Exchange Commission issued pursuant to Section 16 of the 
Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
11.  Termination or Amendment.
	(a)   The Committee may, in its discretion, terminate  or 
amend this Plan from time to time.  In addition, the 
EBPB may make such amendments to the Plan as it deems 
necessary or desirable except those amendments which 
substantially increase the cost of the Plan to the 
Company or significantly alter the benefit design or 
eligibility requirements of the Plan.  Notwithstanding 
the foregoing, the definitions of Mandatory Deferral 
Amount and Fair Market Value herein and Paragraph 
7.1(a) hereof shall not be amended more often than once 
every six months other than to comport with changes in 
the Internal Revenue Code, the Employee Retirement 
Income Security Act, or the rules thereunder.  No 
termination or amendment shall (without Participant's 
consent) alter: a) Participant's right to payments of 
amounts previously credited to Participant's  Accounts, 
which amounts shall continue to earn interest or accu-
mulate dividends as provided for herein as though 
termination or amendment had not been effected, or b) 
the amount or times of payment of such amounts which 
have commenced prior to the effective date of such 
termination or amendment; provided, however, that no 
such consent may accelerate the Participant's payments. 
 Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the Company is 
liquidated, the EBPB shall have the right to determine 
the Total Amount Payable under Paragraph  8 to 
Participant, and to cause the amount so determined to 
be paid in one or more installments or upon such other 
terms and conditions and at such other time (not beyond 
the time provided for herein) as the EBPB determines to 
be just and equitable.  Any determinations made 
pursuant to the preceding sentence shall be consistent 
as to all Participants.
 II.   Except as provided for in this Amendment No. 1, all other 
provisions of the Plan shall remain in full force and 
effect.
	   
	   IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment No. 1 is executed this 
17th day of December, 1996.
			      PENNSYLVANIA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY


			      By:/s/ John M. Chappelear__________
				  John M. Chappelear
				  Chairman
				  Employee Benefit Plan Board
Independent Auditors' Report



The Board of Directors and Shareholders
Canisco Resources, Inc.:

Under date of June 30, 2000, we reported on the consolidated balance
sheets of Canisco Resources, Inc. and subsidiaries as of March 31, 2000
and 1999, and the related consolidated statements of operations,
shareholders' equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-
year period ended March 31, 2000, as contained in the 2000 annual
report on Form 10-K.  In connection with our audits of the
aforementioned consolidated financial statements, we also audited the
related financial statement schedule as listed in the accompanying
index.  This financial statement schedule is the responsibility of the
Company's management.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on
this financial statement schedule based on our audits.

In our opinion, such financial statement schedule, when considered in
relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a
whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set
forth therein.


KPMG LLP


Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
June 30, 2000






Exhibit 99.2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

# AGENCY:

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.

# Time and Date:

10 a.m., Friday, January 15, 2021.

# Place:

Virtual Meeting via Video/Audio Conference.

# Status:

 Closed.

# Matter(s) to be Considered:

1. Personnel Matter.

# FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT:

 Michelle Smith, Director, Division of Board Members at 202-452-2955.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    You may access the Board's website at                     *www.federalreserve.gov*                     for an electronic announcement.                

Dated: January 8, 2021.

Ann Misback,

Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2021-00523 Filed 1-8-21; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
EXHIBIT 21

                       ANDREW CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
                        List of Significant Subsidiaries

Significant subsidiaries of the registrant, all of which are wholly-owned
unless otherwise indicated, are as follows:

Name of                                               Jurisdiction
Sudsidiary                                            of Incorporation

Andrew Africa Pty. Ltd................................South Africa
       (owned 80%)
Andrew AG.............................................Switzerland
Andrew Canada Inc.....................................Canada
Andrew Espana, S.A....................................Spain
Andrew GmbH...........................................Germany
Andrew Industria e Comercio, Ltda.....................Brazil
       (owned 70%)
Andrew International Corporation......................State of Illinois
Andrew Kommunikationssysteme AG.......................Switzerland
Andrew Corporation (Mexico), S.A. de C.V..............Mexico
Andrew SciComm Inc....................................State of Texas
Andrew S.A.R.L........................................France
Andrew S.R.L..........................................Italy
Andrew Systems Inc....................................State of Delaware
Andrew Telecommunications (Suzhou) Co. LTD............China
Andrew Wireless Products B.V..........................Netherlands
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Delegation of Authority No. 354-1]

## Section 1. Delegation

By virtue of the authority vested in the Secretary of State by the laws and authorities of the United States, including those set forth in 22 U.S.C. 2651a; the Debt Collection Improvement Act of 1996, Public Law 104-134 (1996); the Office of Management and Budget's Determination with Respect to Transfer of Functions Pursuant to Public Law 104-316 (December 17, 1996); the Travel and Transportation Reform Act of 1998, Public Law 105-264 (1998); 5 U.S.C. 4108, 5379, 5514, 5522, 5524a, 5705, 5922, and 8707; 22 U.S.C. 2671, 2716, 4047 and 4071; and 31 U.S.C. Chapter 37, and delegated to the Comptroller by Delegation of Authority 354, dated April 23, 2013, I hereby delegate, to the extent authorized by law, the duties, functions and responsibilities for the administrative collection, compromise, suspension, termination of Department collection, advance decision, settlement, and waiver of claims of or against debtors of the Department of State, pursuant to the above-mentioned authorities, to the Associate Comptroller of the Department of State.

## Section 2. General Provisions

(a) The Secretary of State, the Deputy Secretary, the Deputy Secretary for Management and Resources, the Under Secretary for Management, or the Comptroller may at any time exercise any function delegated by this delegation of authority. Functions delegated herein may not be re-delegated.

(b) Any reference in this delegation of authority to any act, executive order, determination, delegation of authority, regulation, or procedure shall be deemed to be a reference to such act, executive order, determination, delegation of authority, regulation, or procedure as amended from time to time.

                    (c) This Delegation of Authority shall be published in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                

Dated: December 14, 2020.

Jeffrey C. Mounts,

Comptroller, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 2021-00793 Filed 1-14-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-37-P
### §§100, 101. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 100 transferred to section 1551 of this title.

Section 101 transferred to section 1552 of this title.
#### 1352.216-75 Minimum and maximum contract amounts.

As prescribed in 48 CFR 1316.506(a), insert the following clause:

# Minimum and Maximum Contract Amounts (APR 2010)

During the term of the contract, the Government shall place orders totaling a minimum of ________. The amount of all orders shall not exceed ________.

(End of clause)

[75 FR 10570, Mar. 8, 2010; 75 FR 14496, Mar. 26, 2010]
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Three-Five
Systems, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Jeffrey D. Buchanan, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer,
Secretary, Treasurer, and Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
78m(a) or 78o(d)); and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company. /s/ Jeffrey D. Buchanan
Jeffrey D. Buchanan
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer,
Secretary, Treasurer, and Director
 Date: August 9, 2004
Worksheet Title: HCl Emission Test Results Template Using Method 321Who Should Complete this Spreadsheet?Company Name:Facility Name:TehachapiAddress:13578 Tehachapi BlvdCity:TehachapiState:CAKiln ID:Kiln Type:PH/PCIn-line Raw Mill:Control Device Configuration:Parameter Sample #1 Sample #2 Sample #3 Test AverageUnits Units Other DescriptionTest Method Used Test Location NoteSelect appropriate unitfrom list. If other isselected please describeunits in column H at right. Enter the name of the Test Method used.Indicate whether the testoccurred upstream ordownstream of a controldevice(s); list the controldevice(s)If kiln has an in-line raw mill,indicate raw mill status during tests(i.e., raw mill on or raw mill off).Provide any other informationsupporting information you think isnecessary about this test report.Sample Date (mm/dd/yyyy)3/25/2010 3/27/2010 3/27/2010HCl Concentration - as measured - dry basis2.83 2.31 0.88ppmvdOxygen Concentration - dry basis13.38 11.77 11.97%CO2 Concentration - dry basis13.96 16.47 15.84%HCl Concentration - corrected to 7% oxygen5.24 3.52 1.36 3.37ppmvd@7% O2 Method 321 Downstream; BaghouseMill OnExhaust Stream %Moisture0.0768 0.0857 0.0765 %Mill OnExhaust Flowrate168536 177917 166377dscfmMill OnExhaust Temperature157.2 165.5 160.4 FMill OnSample Date(mm/dd/yyyy)3/25/2010 3/25/2010HCl Concentration - as measured - drybasis0.91 0.62ppmvdOxygen Concentration - drybasis12.62 13.28%CO2 Concentration - drybasis15.06 13.96%HCl Concentration - corrected to 7% oxygen1.53 1.13 1.33ppmvd@7% O2 Method 321 Downstream; BaghouseMill OffExhaust Stream %Moisture0.0264 0.0311 %Mill OffExhaust Flowrate178441 167033dscfmMill OffExhaust Temperature278.5 277.4 FMill OffNotes:BaghouseEnter HCl concentration value indry parts per million volume(ppmvd). If the test results arebelow detection limit, please notethe detection limit in brackets(e.g., [< 0.010]).Peach shaded cells indicate areas where the user will enter a responseFTIR monitor and process problems.Only two (2) runs were completed during Raw Mill Off condition due to numerousYESFacilities that use Method 321 to test for HClLehigh Southwest Cement CompanyEnclosure5c‐‐ERTSpreadsheetPage1of1
**Exhibit 18 Preferability Letter Regarding Change in Accounting Principle**

 

December 8, 2005 

 

 

Mr. Marty R. Kittrell 

Chief Financial Officer 

Andrew Corporation 

10500 W. 153rd Street 

Orland Park, IL 60462 

 

Dear Mr. Kittrell 

 

Note 1 of Notes toConsolidated Financial Statements of Andrew Corporation, included in its Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2005, describes a change in the method of accounting for valuing inventory from the last-in, first-out (LIFO) method to the first-in,first-out (FIFO) method for that portion of the Company’s inventory which had been valued using the LIFO method. There are no authorative criteria for determining a ‘preferable’ inventory valuation method based on the particularcircumstances; however, we conclude that such change in the method of accounting is to an acceptable alternative method which, based on your business judgment to make this change and for the stated reasons, is preferable in your circumstances.

 

Very truly yours, 

 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP 

Chicago, Illinois
#### Hunting Supply Corporation, Respondent, v. Austin M. Febrey, Appellant.

Order unanimously reversed, without costs of this appeal to either party, and motion denied, without costs, and without prejudice to the right of the defendant to move to dismiss for failure to prosecute. Memorandum: There are questions of fact which require determination. Therefore it was error to grant summary judgment. It is significant that the defendant has interposed a counterclaim for an amount in excess of the plaintiff’s claim to which there is no reply. Thus the allegations of the counterclaim are deemed admitted. Where there is a legally sufficient counterclaim for an amount in excess of the amount demanded in the complaint the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment must be denied. *(Illinois McGraw Elec. Co.*v. *John J. Walters Inc.,*7 N Y 2d 874; *Treacy*v. *Melrose Paper Stock Co.,*269 N. Y. 155; *Hellmuth*v. *Brandin,*3 A D 2d 997.) Special Term quite properly treated the papers of the defendant in opposition to the motion not as a cross motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to prosecute but rather as a defense of laches to the motion itself. The conclusion herein *1011reached is without prejudice to the defendant to move to dismiss the complaint for failure to prosecute upon proper papers if so advised. (Appeal from an order of Jefferson Special Term granting plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment.) Present — Williams, P. J., Goldman, Henry, Noonan and Del Vecchio, JJ.