alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# State-by-State

X0A0T

X0A1T

X0A2T

X0A3T

X0A4T

X0A5T

X0A6T

X0A7T

X0A8T

X0A9T

X0A10T

X0A11T

X0A12T

X0A13T

X0A14T

X0A15T

X0A16T

X0A17T

X0A18T

X0A19T

X0A20T

X0A21T

X0A22T

X0A23T

X0A24T

X0A25T

X0A26T

X0A27T

X0A28T

X0A29T

X0A30T

X0A31T

X0A32T

X0A33T

X0A34T

X0A35T

X0A36T

X0A37T

X0A38T

X0A39T

X0A40T

X0A41T

X0A42T

X0A43T

X0A44T

X0A45T

X0A46T

X0A47T

X0A48T

X0A49T

X0A50T

X0A51T

X0A52T

X0A53T

X0A54T

X0A55T

X0A56T

X0A57T

X0A58T
http://invalid.urihttp://invalid.urihttp://invalid.urihttp://invalid.urihttp://invalid.urihttp://invalid.urihttp://invalid.urihttp://invalid.urihttp://invalid.urihttp://invalid.urihttp://invalid.urihttp://invalid.urihttp://invalid.urihttp://invalid.urihttp://invalid.urihttp://invalid.urihttp://invalid.urihttp://invalid.urihttp://invalid.urihttp://invalid.urihttp://invalid.urihttp://invalid.urihttp://invalid.urihttp://invalid.urihttp://invalid.urihttp://invalid.urihttp://invalid.urihttp://invalid.urihttp://invalid.urihttp://invalid.urihttp://invalid.urihttp://invalid.urihttp://invalid.urihttp://invalid.urihttp://invalid.urihttp://invalid.urihttp://invalid.urihttp://invalid.urihttp://invalid.urihttp://invalid.urihttp://invalid.urihttp://invalid.urihttp://invalid.urihttp://invalid.urihttp://invalid.urihttp://invalid.urihttp://invalid.urihttp://invalid.urihttp://invalid.urihttp://invalid.urihttp://invalid.urihttp://invalid.urihttp://invalid.urihttp://invalid.urihttp://invalid.urihttp://invalid.urihttp://invalid.urihttp://invalid.urihttp://invalid.uri
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Albert Smalls, Appellant.

— Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered August 5, 1977, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Judgment reversed, on the law, indictment dismissed, and case remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for the purpose of entering an order in its discretion pursuant to CPL 160.50. The guilt of defendant was not established beyond a reasonable doubt. Rabin, J. P., Shapiro, Cohalan and Martuscello, JJ., concur.
### §1724. Personnel management authorities for positions involved in the development and implementation of the interoperable electronic data system ("Chimera system")

#### (a) In general

Notwithstanding any other provision of law relating to position classification or employee pay or performance, the Attorney General may hire and fix the compensation of necessary scientific, technical, engineering, and other analytical personnel for the purpose of the development and implementation of the interoperable electronic data system described in section 1722(a)(2) of this title (also known as the "Chimera system").

#### (b) Limitation on rate of pay

Except as otherwise provided by law, no employee compensated under subsection (a) may be paid at a rate in excess of the rate payable for a position at level III of the Executive Schedule.

#### (c) Limitation on total calendar year payments

Total payments to employees under any system established under this section shall be subject to the limitation on payments to employees under section 5307 of title 5.

#### (d) Operating plan

Not later than 90 days after May 14, 2002, the Attorney General shall submit to the Committee on Appropriations, the Committee on the Judiciary, the Select Committee on Intelligence, and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate and the Committee on Appropriations, the Committee on the Judiciary, the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, and the Committee on International Relations of the House of Representatives an operating plan—

(1) describing the Attorney General's intended use of the authority under this section; and

(2) identifying any provisions of title 5 being waived for purposes of the development and implementation of the Chimera system.

#### (e) Termination date

The authority of this section shall terminate upon the implementation of the Chimera system.

(Pub. L. 107–173, title II, §204, May 14, 2002, 116 Stat. 551.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Level III of the Executive Schedule, referred to in subsec. (b), is set out in section 5314 of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Committee on International Relations of House of Representatives changed to Committee on Foreign Affairs of House of Representatives by House Resolution No. 6, One Hundred Tenth Congress, Jan. 5, 2007.
#### CAFÉ CENTRAL v. READON.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.

November 18, 1903.)

1. Execution—Evidence—Ownership op Property.

On an issue as to the ownership of liquor taken under execution, it was proper to admit in evidence mortgages given thereon by one claimed to be the owner, his affidavit attached to one of them, and his application on a liquor tax certificate.

Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Fourth District.

Action by the Café Central against John H. Readon. From a judgment in favor of defendant, plaintiff appeals. Affirmed.

Argued before FREEDMAN, P. J., and BISCHOFF, and BLANCHARD, JJ.

Herbert J. Hindes, for appellant.

Marcus Helfand, for respondent.

BLANCHARD, J.

We are of the opinion that the evidence in the case shows that Friedman, the judgment debtor, owned the liquor that was levied upon and sold by the defendant as marshal. We do not think the court below erred in admitting in evidence the mortgages, Friedman’s affidavit attached to one of them, and his application on a fir-or tax certificate; and the plaintiff’s exceptions thereto are not well taken. Judgment must be affirmed, with costs. All concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>     5
<LEGEND>      THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL 
              INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE COMPANY'S
              FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE PERIOD
              ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 1997, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
              ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
              STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>  1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                    SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                          $       131
<SECURITIES>                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                        12,680
<ALLOWANCES>                              0
<INVENTORY>                          10,009
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                     24,042
<PP&E>                               80,440
<DEPRECIATION>                       46,392
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                       67,191
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                12,820
<BONDS>                                 600
<COMMON>                              1,087
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                               0
<OTHER-SE>                           38,106
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>         67,191
<SALES>                              24,716
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                     24,716
<CGS>                                21,594
<TOTAL-COSTS>                        23,255
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       20
<INCOME-PRETAX>                       1,441
<INCOME-TAX>                            489
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     952
<DISCONTINUED>                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                            952
<EPS-PRIMARY>                          0.88
<EPS-DILUTED>                          0.88
        

</TABLE>
16.102 Policies. ( a ) Contracts resulting from sealed bidding shall be firm-fixed-price contracts or fixed-price contracts with economic price adjustment.
( b ) Contracts negotiated under part 15 may be of any type or combination of types that will promote the Government's interest, except as restricted in this part (see 10 U.S.C. 3321(a) and 41 U.S.C. 3901). Contract types not described in this regulation shall not be used, except as a deviation under subpart 1.4.
( c ) The cost-plus-a-percentage-of-cost system of contracting shall not be used (see 10 U.S.C. 3322(a) and 41 U.S.C. 3905(a)). Prime contracts (including letter contracts) other than firm-fixed-price contracts shall, by an appropriate clause, prohibit cost- plus-a-percentage-of-cost subcontracts (see clauses prescribed in subpart 44.2 for cost-reimbursement contracts and subparts 16.2 and 16.4 for fixed-price contracts).
( d ) No contract may be awarded before the execution of any determination and findings (D&F's) required by this part. Minimum requirements for the content of D&F's required by this part are specified in 1.704.
[48 FR 42219, Sept. 19, 1983, as amended at 50 FR 1741, Jan. 11, 1985; 50 FR 52429, Dec. 23, 1985; 79 FR 24202, Apr. 29, 2014; 87 FR 73898, Dec. 1, 2022]
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

1 386 U.S. 738 (1967). United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED June 7, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-11118 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus RAMON CASTRO-LEON, also known as Richard Placencia, also known as Ramon Leon-Castro, also known as Jose Ramon-Castro, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:02-CR-404-ALL-D

-------------------- Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Ramon Castro-Leon (Castro) has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California
. 1 Castro was notified of counsel’s motion and brief and did not file a response.No. 03-11118 -2-

2 See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2. Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. 2
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dynamic MaterialsCorporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31,2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Richard A. Santa, Vice President and Chief Financial Officerof the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(i)                  The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(ii)               The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

May 1, 2009

 

 
|   | /s/ Richard  A. Santa                              |   |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Richard A.  Santa                                  |
|   | Senior Vice  President and Chief Financial Officer |
|   | of Dynamic Materials  Corporation                  |

 

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to Dynamic Materials Corporation and will be retained by DynamicMaterials Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.

 

----
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Dynamic Materials Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Richard A. Santa, VicePresident and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

(i)          The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

(ii)         The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

August 3, 2006
|        | /s/ Richard A.  Santa                       |
|--------|---------------------------------------------|
|   | Richard A. Santa                            |
|   | Vice President  and Chief Financial Officer |
|   | of Dynamic  Materials Corporation           |

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to Dynamic Materials Corporation and will be retained by DynamicMaterials Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.

 

----
# TITLE 9—ARBITRATION

This title was enacted by act July 30, 1947, ch. 392, §1, 61 Stat. 669

Chap.
Sec.
1.
General provisions
1
2.
Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards
201
3.
Inter-American Convention on International Commercial Arbitration
301
4.
Arbitration of disputes involving sexual assault and sexual harassment
401

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2022**—Pub. L. 117–90, §2(b)(3), Mar. 3, 2022, 136 Stat. 27, added item for chapter 4.

**1990**—Pub. L. 101–369, §2, Aug. 15, 1990, 104 Stat. 450, added item for chapter 3.

**1970**—Pub. L. 91–368, §2, July 31, 1970, 84 Stat. 693, added analysis of chapters.

#### Table

Showing where former sections of Title 9 and the laws from which such former sections were derived, have been incorporated in revised Title 9.

| *Title 9 Former Sections* | *Statutes at Large* | *Title 9 New Sections* |
| ------------------------- | ----------------------------------------- | ---------------------- |
| 1 | Feb. 12, 1925, ch. 213, §1, 43 Stat. 883 | 1 |
| 2 | Feb. 12, 1925, ch. 213, §2, 43 Stat. 883 | 2 |
| 3 | Feb. 12, 1925, ch. 213, §3, 43 Stat. 883 | 3 |
| 4 | Feb. 12, 1925, ch. 213, §4, 43 Stat. 883 | 4 |
| 5 | Feb. 12, 1925, ch. 213, §5, 43 Stat. 884 | 5 |
| 6 | Feb. 12, 1925, ch. 213, §6, 43 Stat. 884 | 6 |
| 7 | Feb. 12, 1925, ch. 213, §7, 43 Stat. 884 | 7 |
| 8 | Feb. 12, 1925, ch. 213, §8, 43 Stat. 884 | 8 |
| 9 | Feb. 12, 1925, ch. 213, §9, 43 Stat. 885 | 9 |
| 10 | Feb. 12, 1925, ch. 213, §10, 43 Stat. 885 | 10 |
| 11 | Feb. 12, 1925, ch. 213, §11, 43 Stat. 885 | 11 |
| 12 | Feb. 12, 1925, ch. 213, §12, 43 Stat. 885 | 12 |
| 13 | Feb. 12, 1925, ch. 213, §13, 43 Stat. 886 | 13 |
| 14 | Feb. 12, 1925, ch. 213, §14, 43 Stat. 886 | Rep. |
| 15 | Feb. 12, 1925, ch. 213, §15, 43 Stat. 886 | 14 |

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Positive Law; Citation

This title has been made positive law by section 1 of act July 30, 1947, ch. 392, 61 Stat. 669, which provided in part that: "title 9 of the United States Code, entitled 'Arbitration', is codified and enacted into positive law and may be cited as '9 U.S.C., §—' ".

#### Repeals

Act July 30, 1947, ch. 392, §2, 61 Stat. 674, provided that the sections or parts thereof of the Statutes at Large covering provisions codified in this Act, insofar as such provisions appeared in former title 9 were repealed and provided that any rights or liabilities now existing under such repealed sections or parts thereof shall not be affected by such repeal.
#### Sylvia Pearl et al., Appellants, v. James Cagle, Respondent.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated September 29, 1960, denying a preference in a trial under rule 9 of the Queens County Supreme Court Rules. Order affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Ughetta, Christ and Brennan, JJ., concur.
### §§725 to 727. Repealed. June 27, 1952, ch. 477, title IV, §403(a)(42), 66 Stat. 280, eff. Dec. 24, 1952

Section 725, acts Oct. 14, 1940, ch. 876, title I, subchap. III, §325, 54 Stat. 1150; Sept. 23, 1950, ch. 1024, title I, §26, 64 Stat. 1015, related to aliens serving on certain United States vessels. See section 1441(a)(1) of this title.

Section 726, act Oct. 14, 1940, ch. 876, title I, subchap. III, §326, 54 Stat. 1150, related to alien enemies. See section 1442(a)–(c), (e) of this title.

Section 727, acts Oct. 14, 1940, ch. 876, title I, subchap. III, §327, 54 Stat. 1150; May 16, 1947, ch. 72, 61 Stat. 97, related to administration of naturalization laws. See section 1443 of this title.
FILED

June 12,1998

Cecil W. Crowson

Appellate Court Clerk

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT NASHVILLE

CATHY P. SPRAYBERRY- )

GRAVITT, )

)

Plaintiff/Appellant, ) Appeal No.

) 01-A-01-9707-CH-00295

v. )

) Montgomery Chancery

DAVID BAKER, Director of ) No. 95-08-0143

Schools for the CLARKSVILLE- )

MONTGOMERY COUNTY )

SCHOOLS and )

THE CLARKSVILLE- )

MONTGOMERY COUNTY )

BOARD OF EDUCATION, )

)

Defendants/Appellees. )

)

O R D E R

We have reviewed appellee's Petition to Rehear. Counsel correctly

points out that the Education Improvement Act of 1992 specified certain duties

in the County Administration of education. The two sections cited [T.C.A. 49-2-

301(f)(10) and T.C.A. 49-2-203(a)(1)] do refer to "recommendation" of the

superintendent to the local board of education. It is the duty of the

superintendent to recommend teachers who qualify and the board "elects" such

teachers to tenure status as it deems appropriate.

It does not, however, follow, as appellee contends, that the board is

powerless to elect a teacher to tenure if the superintendent, through intent or

inadvertance, fails to recommend their election. We do not believe the

legislature intended to strip the board of this function. Accordingly, the petition

is denied.

________________________________

HENRY F. TODD, PRESIDING JUDGE

___________________________________

BEN H. CANTRELL, JUDGE
___________________________________

WALTERW.BUSSART,SPECIALJUDGE
#### 1332.702 Policy.

Contracting officers shall obtain assurances of available funds only from properly authorized designated certifying officers in accordance with Part 4, Section 1110 of the Treasury Financial Manual.
#### (A) In the Matter of New York City Terminal Market (Hunts Point Area, Bronx). City of New York; Moses Daniel Cohan et al. (B) Richard Brands, an Infant, by His Guardian ad Litem, Kathleen Brands, et al., v. City of New York et al., and Slattery Rock Corp. *926(C) Andres Galban v. Penn Shipping Co., Inc., et al.

*925Concur —Botein, P. J., Breitel, McNally, Stevens and Bergan, JJ. —Concur — Breitel, J. P., *926Rabin, Valente, Eager and Noonan, JJ. Concur — Botein, P. J., Rabin, Valente, McNally and Eager, JJ. [In each action.] Motion for leave to reargue or for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied, with $10 costs.
### §§801 to 810. Repealed. June 27, 1952, ch. 477, title IV, §403(a)(42), 66 Stat. 280, eff. Dec. 24, 1952

Section 801, acts Oct. 14, 1940, ch. 876, title I, subchap. IV, §401, 54 Stat. 1168; Jan. 20, 1944, ch. 2, §1, 58 Stat. 4; July 1, 1944, ch. 368, §1, 58 Stat. 677; Sept. 27, 1944, ch. 418, §1, 58 Stat. 746, related to general means of losing United States nationality. See section 1481(a) of this title.

Section 802, act Oct. 14, 1940, ch. 876, title I, subchap. IV, §402, 54 Stat. 1169, related to presumption of expatriation. See section 1482 of this title.

Section 803, acts Oct. 14, 1940, ch. 876, title I, subchap. IV, §403, 54 Stat. 1169; July 1, 1944, ch. 368, §2, 58 Stat. 677, related to restrictions on expatriation. See sections 1482 and 1483(b) of this title.

Section 804, act Oct. 14, 1940, ch. 876, title I, subchap. IV, §404, 54 Stat. 1170, related to expatriation of naturalized nationals by residence abroad. See section 1484(a) of this title.

Section 805, act Oct. 14, 1940, ch. 876, title I, subchap. IV, §405, 54 Stat. 1170, related to exceptions in the case of persons employed or compensated by United States while residing abroad. See section 1485(1), (2) of this title.

Section 806, acts Oct. 14, 1940, ch. 876, title I, subchap. IV, §406, 54 Stat. 1170; Dec. 8, 1942, ch. 696, 56 Stat. 1043; Dec. 24, 1942, ch. 819, 56 Stat. 1085, related to additional exceptions. See section 1485(3)–(9) of this title.

Section 807, act Oct. 14, 1940, ch. 876, title I, subchap. IV, §407, 54 Stat. 1170, related to minor children of naturalized nationals losing nationality by foreign residence. See section 1487 of this title.

Section 808, act Oct. 14, 1940, ch. 876, title I, subchap. IV, §408, 54 Stat. 1171, related to exclusiveness of means of losing nationality. See section 1488 of this title.

Section 809, acts Oct. 14, 1940, ch. 876, title I, subchap. IV, §409, 54 Stat. 1171; Oct. 16, 1941, ch. 446, 55 Stat. 743; Oct. 9, 1942, ch. 585, 56 Stat. 779; Sept. 27, 1944, ch. 419, 58 Stat. 747; Oct. 11, 1945, ch. 410, 59 Stat. 544, related to nationality not lost under sections 804 or 807 until October, 1942. See section 1487 of this title.

Section 810, act Oct. 14, 1940, ch. 876, title I, subchap. IV, §410, 54 Stat. 1171, related to chapter being inapplicable where it contravened convention of treaties. See section 1489 of this title.
#### 1237.7002 Applicability.

The policy at 1237.7000 applies to all contracts (as defined in FAR 2.101) awarded by DOT for training services when DOT controls the content and/or presentation of the course. This policy does not apply to courses attended by DOT employees that are offered and sponsored by Government sources of supply, educational institutions, or private entities where DOT does not control the course content or presentation (*see* 1213.7100 for examples).
### §303. Order to compel arbitration; appointment of arbitrators; locale

(a) A court having jurisdiction under this chapter may direct that arbitration be held in accordance with the agreement at any place therein provided for, whether that place is within or without the United States. The court may also appoint arbitrators in accordance with the provisions of the agreement.

(b) In the event the agreement does not make provision for the place of arbitration or the appointment of arbitrators, the court shall direct that the arbitration shall be held and the arbitrators be appointed in accordance with Article 3 of the Inter-American Convention.

(Added Pub. L. 101–369, §1, Aug. 15, 1990, 104 Stat. 448.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective upon the entry into force of the Inter-American Convention on International Commercial Arbitration of January 30, 1975, with respect to the United States (Oct. 27, 1990), see section 3 of Pub. L. 101–369, set out as a note under section 301 of this title.
### §§7671, 7672. Repealed. Pub. L. 113–79, title VII, §7311, Feb. 7, 2014, 128 Stat. 893

Section 7671, Pub. L. 105–185, title VI, §631, June 23, 1998, 112 Stat. 608, related to evaluation and assessment of agricultural research, extension, and education programs.

Section 7672, Pub. L. 105–185, title VI, §632, June 23, 1998, 112 Stat. 608, related to study of federally funded agricultural research, extension, and education.