alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §2225. Employment of temporary personnel

The Department of Agriculture may employ persons or organizations, on a temporary basis, by contract or otherwise: Provided, That no expenditures for such temporary employment shall be made unless provision is made therefor in the applicable appropriation and the cost thereof is not in excess of limitations prescribed therein.

(Sept. 21, 1944, ch. 412, title VII, §706(a), 58 Stat. 742; Ex. Ord. No. 9577, June 29, 1945, 10 F.R. 4253.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

This section was enacted as a part of the Department of Agriculture Organic Act of 1944.

First sentence of section which related to the authority of the War Food Administrator to employ personnel was omitted on the authority of Ex. Ord. No. 9577, which terminated the War Food Administration.

The exception from "the Classification Act of 1923, as amended" was omitted as obsolete. Sections 1202 and 1204 of the Classification Act of 1949 (63 Stat. 972, 973) repealed the 1923 Act and all laws or parts of laws inconsistent with the 1949 Act. While section 1106(a) of the 1949 Act provided that references in other laws to the 1923 Act should be held and considered to mean the 1949 Act, it did not have the effect of continuing the exception contained in this section because of section 1106(b) that provided that the application of the 1949 Act to any position, officer, or employee shall not be affected by section 1106(a). The Classification Act of 1949 was repealed by Pub. L. 89–544, §8(a), Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 632 (section 1 of which revised and enacted Title 5, Government Organization and Employees, into law). Section 5102 of Title 5 now contains the applicability provisions of the 1949 Act.

Section was formerly classified to section 574 of Title 5 prior to the general revision and enactment of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees, by Pub. L. 89–554, §1, Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 378.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

Functions of all officers, agencies, and employees of Department of Agriculture transferred, with certain exceptions, to Secretary of Agriculture by 1953 Reorg. Plan No. 2, §1, eff. June 4, 1953, 18 F.R. 3219, 67 Stat. 633, set out as a note under section 2201 of this title.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Esterline Technologies
Corporation (the "COMPANY") on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended April 29, 2005
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"FORM 10-Q/A"), I, Robert D. George, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Form 10-Q/A fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

      (2) The information contained in the Form 10-Q/A fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: January 6, 2006              By: /s/ Robert D. George
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                                     Robert D. George
                                        Vice President, Chief Financial Officer,
                                                    Secretary and Treasurer
#### Samuel Nissel, Appellant, v. Joachim Rosen et al., Individually and as Copartners Doing Business under the Name of Quality Iron Works, Respondents.

Judgment, entered on June 3, 1963, dismissing the complaint at the close of plaintiff’s case in an action for personal injuries for failure to establish a prima facie case, unanimously reversed, on the law and on the facts, and a new trial ordered, with costs to abide the event. Plaintiff’s proof enabled the jury to find that defendants’ employee standing behind the solid metal fire escape door negligently attempted to close it when he knew or should have known a person, the plaintiff, was stationed in front of it in a position of danger. Concur — Botein, P. J., Rabin, McNally, Stevens and Steuer, JJ.
Case: 1:12-cv-01196 Document #: 24 Filed: 06/19/12 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:70

Case: 1:12-cv-01196 Document #: 24 Filed: 06/19/12 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:71
#### In the Matter of Harry E. Frankel et al., Appellants, v. Hortense Gabel, as City Rent and Rehabilitation Administrator, et al., Respondents.

Order, entered on September 25, 1963, denying petitioners’ application to review respondents’ determination as to petitioners’ salary rates vacated on the law and the facts, and matter remanded to Special Term for further proceedings, without costs to any party. Petitioners were civil service employees of the New York State Temporary Rent Commission. On May 1, 1962, the functions of that commission as regards the City of New York were transferred to the New York City Rent and Rehabilitation Administration. Employees of the State bureau were transferred to the city service. The statute pursuant to which the transfer was made (Local Emergency Housing Rent Control Act, § 1, subd. 14; L. 1962, eh. 21) provides, in part: *“*Officers and employees transferred to the city housing rent agency pursuant to this subdivision shall *668be entitled to full seniority credit for all purposes, including the determination of their city salaries and increments, for service in the state government rendered prior to such transfer, as though such service had been service in the city government.” The meaning of this section is that the city shall fix the base salary for the position held by the transferred employee and shall pay him that salary plus whatever increments he would be entitled to by virtue of the city’s wage laws if his service in the State office had been in city employ. To give a concrete example, an employee of five years’ service in the State department would receive whatever salary the city fixed for the position plus whatever increment a city employee would receive for five years’ service in that position at that salary. We do not understand that the parties suggest any other procedure, and Special Term so found. Special Term dismissed the petition on the ground that petitioners’ salaries were, in fact, fixed and paid on that formula. We find the record inadequate and confusing. The difficulty is increased by the city’s iteration that some of these employees will receive what they are claiming next year. This is hardly an argument if they are entitled to it this year. The matter is capable of simple and exact resolution on proof of the record facts involved. It is remanded for the taking of that proof. Concur — Botein, P. J., Valente, McNally, Stevens and Steuer, JJ.
Case: 1:12-cr-00124 Document #: 77 Filed: 03/21/13 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:321
#### § 552.54 Solicitation.

The installation commanders may permit solicitation and transaction of commercial business on military installations. These solicitations and transactions must conform to installation regulations (CONUS and overseas) and must not interfere with military activities. No person may enter an installation and transact commercial business as a matter of right.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Dynamic Materials Corporation (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009 as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Yvon Pierre Cariou, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuantto  Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(i)                  The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(ii)               The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 

October 30, 2009

 

 
|   | /s/  Yvon Pierre Cariou                |   |
|--------|----------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Yvon  Pierre Cariou                    |   |
|   | President and Chief  Executive Officer |   |
|   | of Dynamic Materials  Corporation      |   |

 

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to Dynamic Materials Corporation and will be retained by DynamicMaterials Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.

 

----
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Angel Rodriguez, Appellant.

Judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered March 31, 1978, affirmed. No opinion. This case is remitted to the Supreme Court, Queens County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (subd 5). Gulotta, J. P., Cohalan, Margett and O’Connor, JJ., concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Selective Service System

# AGENCY:

Selective Service System.

# ACTION:

Notice.

The following forms have been submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for extension of clearance in compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35):

## SSS FORMS 2, 3A, 3B and 3C

*Title:*                     Selective Service System Change of Information, Correction/Change Form, and Registration Status Forms.                

*Purpose:*                     To insure the accuracy and completeness of the Selective Service System registration data.                          ( print page 2477)    

*Respondents:*                     Registrants are required to report changes or corrections in data submitted on the SSS Form 1.                

*Frequency:*                     When changes in a registrant's name or address occur.                

*Burden:*                     A burden of two minutes or less on the individual respondent.                

*Change:*                     Registrant may now update their email address and phone number.                

Copies of the above identified forms can be obtained upon written request to the Selective Service System, Operations Directorate, 1515 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, Virginia 22209-2425.

Written comments and recommendations for the proposed extension of clearance of the form should be sent within 30 days of the publication of this notice to the Selective Service System, Operations Directorate, 1515 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, Virginia 22209-2425.

A copy of the comments should be sent to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Attention: Desk Officer, Selective Service System, Office of Management and Budget, New Executive Office Building, Room 3235, Washington, DC 20503.

Wadi Yakhour,

Chief of Staff.

[FR Doc. 2021-00448 Filed 1-11-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8015-01-P
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

The pages and documents posted on this site include links to information created by other public and private organizations.  These links are provided for the user's convenience.  ED does not control or guarantee the accuracy, relevance, timeliness, or completeness of this non-ED information.  The inclusion of these links is not intended to reflect their importance, nor is it intended to endorse views expressed, or products or services offered, on these non-ED sites.

Please note that privacy policies on non-ED sites may differ from ED's privacy policy.  When you visit ED.gov, no personal information is collected unless you choose to provide that information to us. We do not give, share, sell, or transfer any personal information to a third party.  We recommend that you read the privacy policy of non-ED websites that you visit.  We invite you to read our privacy policy.

----

 

 Printable view

## How Do I Find...

          - Student loans, forgiveness
          - Higher Education Rulemaking
          - College accreditation
          - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
          - FERPA
          - FAFSA
          - 1098, tax forms

More >

## Information About...

          - Elevating Teaching
          - Early Learning
          - Engage Every Student
          - Unlocking Career Success
          - Cybersecurity

 

----

*Our mission*

Student Loans
Repaying LoansDefaulted LoansLoan ForgivenessLoan Servicers

Grants & Programs
Apply for Pell GrantsGrants ForecastApply for a Grant

Laws & Guidance
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)FERPACivil RightsNew IDEA Website

Data & Research
Education StatisticsPostsecondary Education DataED Data ExpressNation's Report CardWhat Works ClearinghouseOpen Data PlatformCOVID Relief Data

About Us
Contact UsED OfficesJobsPress ReleasesFAQsRecursos en españolBudget, PerformancePrivacy Program

----

          - Notices
          - FOIA
          - Privacy Policy
          - Accessibility
          - Security
          - Information quality
          - Inspector General
          - Whitehouse.gov
          - USA.gov
          - Benefits.gov
          - Regulations.gov
          - vote.gov
#### 1209.400 Scope of subpart.

This subpart provides DOT's policy and procedures for the debarment and suspension of contractors.
#### James C. Heaney, Respondent, v. Edward Letchworth et al., Appellants.

Application for the time for defendants to answer amended complaint extended to 15 days after the entry in this court of an order deciding the appeal in the action, and stay granted for same period of time upon condition that records and appellant’s briefs be filed and served on or before November 2, 1960.
CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


AND
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The undersigned hereby certify,
pursuant to, and as required by, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of DCAP
Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that information contained in such
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: 
      May 15, 2009
                      By:
                      /s/ Barry
      B. GoldsteinBarry
      B. GoldsteinChief
      Executive OfficerBy:
                      /s/
      Victor BrodskyVictor
      BrodskyPrincipal
      Financial Officer
#### Rolling Hills Country Club, Inc. *v.*Town of Wilton

*Arthur C. Williams*and *Melvin J. Silverman,*in support of the motion.

*Robert A. Fuller,*in opposition.

Submitted September 27

decided October *4,*1974

The application from the Court of Common Pleas in Fairfield County at Stamford of the Connecticut State Golf Association for leave to file a brief and to argue before this court as amicus curiae is granted to the extent that leave is granted to file a brief on the issue of whether land used as a golf course, not open to the general public or residents at large of the town in which it is located, may qualify for “open space” classification and therefore tax relief under the provisions of the General Statutes affording tax relief to areas of open space land.
#### 13.303 Blanket purchase agreements (BPAs).
Privacy Impact Assessment (PIA) for the 

ED.gov Blogs 

This PIA was approved on and reviewed on by the system owner 

March 18, 2015 

March 18, 2015 Oct. 16, 2018 

certifying the information contained here is current and up to date. 

Contact Point 

Contact Person/Title: 

Contact Email: 

Jim Mould 

jim.mould@ed.gov 

System Owner 

Program Office: 

Name/Title: 

Office of Communication & Outreach (OCO) 

Carollyn Hammersmith 

)RUDQ\TXHVWLRQVUHJDUGLQJWKLVFHUWLILFDWLRQSOHDVHFRQWDFWWKH3ULYDF\6DIHJXDUGV

'LYLVLRQDWprivacysafeguards@ed.gov.
### §§46 to 51. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Sections 46 to 51 transferred to sections 1984 to 1987, 1989, and 1990, respectively, of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare.
-1- 

### STATE OF MICHIGAN

COURT OF APPEALS

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellant, UNPUBLISHED February 5, 2015

v No. 314564
Calhoun Circuit Court LORINDA IRENE SWAIN, LC No. 2001-004547-FC

Defendant-Appellee.

Before: S TEPHENS , P.J., and H OEKSTRA and M ETER
, JJ.

S TEPHENS
, J. ( concurring ).

I concur in the majority’s result and analysis as to the issue s of newly discovered
evidence and a Brady violation. I concur in the resu lt only as to the actual innoc ence claim because while I agree there is no authority for an independent actual innocence standard in Michigan, I believe the proofs in this case are such that under a Swain , 288 Mich App at 638, standard, this case is one in which it is more likely than not that no reasonable juror would have found the defendant guilty. This case is already one with reca ntations and inconsistencies which, with the testimony of Book, would be one where a guilty verdict would more likely than not be rendered by a reasonable jury.

/s/ Cynthia Diane Stephens
### §427j. Repealed. Aug. 11, 1955, ch. 790, §2, 69 Stat. 674

Section, act June 29, 1935, ch. 338, title I, §11, as added Aug. 14, 1946, ch. 966, title I, §101(2), 60 Stat. 1086; amended July 31, 1947, ch. 412, 61 Stat. 694; Aug. 30, 1954, ch. 1076, §1(7), 68 Stat. 966, authorized use of funds appropriated for agricultural research program for market research projects and required an annual report to Congress. See sections 361a to 361h of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Existing Rights and Liabilities

Any rights or liabilities existing under this section as unaffected by repeal, see section 2 of act Aug. 11, 1955, set out as a note under section 361 of this title.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 5.0.3

Eastern Division

Bubble Gum Productions, LLC

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:12−cv−00595

Honorable Joan H. Lefkow

Does 1−37

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Thursday, October 4, 2012:

 MINUTE entry before Honorable Joan H. Lefkow: Status hearing reset for

10/18/2012 at 08:30 AM. If dismissal paperwork submitted prior to 10/18/2012, no

appearance is necessary on 10/18/2012.Mailed notice(mad, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:12-cv-00595 Document #: 27 Filed: 10/04/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:144
#### 1304.201 Procedures.
### §5603a. Global market strategy

#### (a) In general

Not later than 180 days after May 13, 2002, and biennially thereafter, the Secretary of Agriculture shall consult with the Committee on Agriculture, and the Committee on International Relations, of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry of the Senate on the formulation and implementation of a global market strategy for the Department of Agriculture that, to the maximum extent practicable—

(1) identifies opportunities for the growth of agricultural exports to overseas markets;

(2) ensures that the resources, programs, and policies of the Department are coordinated with those of other agencies; and

(3) remove 1 barriers to agricultural trade in overseas markets.

#### (b) Review

The consultations under subsection (a) shall include a review of—

(1) the strategic goals of the Department; and

(2) the progress of the Department in implementing the strategic goals through the global market strategy.

(Pub. L. 107–171, title III, §3206, May 13, 2002, 116 Stat. 301.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002, and not as part of the Agricultural Trade Act of 1978 which comprises this chapter.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Committee on International Relations of House of Representatives changed to Committee on Foreign Affairs of House of Representatives by House Resolution No. 6, One Hundred Tenth Congress, Jan. 5, 2007.

1 So in original. Probably should be "removes".
#### § 770.53 Purpose.

To promulgate regulations and procedures governing entry upon Portsmouth Naval Shipyard, and to prevent the interruption of the functions and operations of Portsmouth Naval Shipyard by the presence of any unauthorized person within the boundaries of Portsmouth Naval Shipyard.