alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         January 7, 2021.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

      ( print page 1123)    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 28, 2020, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, & First-Class Package Service Contract 73 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2021-59, CP2021-61.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2020-29311 Filed 1-6-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
#### 1345.107 Contract clauses.
### §54. Classification by Department of Agriculture; certification thereof; effect of certificate; regulations for classification

Any person who has custody of or a financial interest in any cotton may submit the same or samples thereof, drawn in accordance with the regulations of the Secretary of Agriculture, to such officer or officers of the Department of Agriculture, as may be designated for the purpose pursuant to the regulations of the Secretary of Agriculture for a determination of the true classification of such cotton or samples, including the comparison thereof, if requested, with types or other samples submitted for the purpose. The final certificate of the Department of Agriculture showing such determination shall be binding on officers of the United States and shall be accepted in the courts of the United States as prima facie evidence of the true classification or comparison of such cotton or samples when involved in any transaction or shipment in commerce. The Secretary of Agriculture shall fix rules and regulations for submitting samples of cotton for classification providing that all samples shall be numbered so that no one interested in the transaction involved shall be known by any classifier engaged in the classification of such cotton samples.

(Mar. 4, 1923, ch. 288, §4, 42 Stat. 1517.)
1334.003 Responsibilities. ( a ) The designee authorized to carry out the responsibilities described under FAR 34.003 is set forth in CAM 1301.70.
( b ) Agency procedures related to major system acquisitions are set forth in DAO 208-3.
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

About EDOVERVIEW

Full Document PDF (5.8M)

**APR Individual Sections:**
                - Mission and Organizational Structure PDF (433KB)
                - Overview PDF (213KB)
                - Performance Results Details PDF  (1.5MB)
                - Performance Plan Summary PDF (1.6MB)
                Goal 1 PDF (734KB)
Goal 2 PDF (684KB)
Goal 3 PDF (666KB)
Goal 4 PDF (643KB)
Goal 5 PDF (687KB)
Goal 6 PDF (647KB)

                - Appendix A: Data Validity and Verification PDF (979KB)
                - Appendix B: Changed Performance Goals PDF (424KB)
                - Appendix C: Additional Programs by Goal PDF (345KB)
                - Appendix D: Summary of Performance Evaluations Released During FY 2016–17 and Expected During FY 2017–18 PDF (562KB)
                - Appendix E: Glossary of Acronyms and Abbreviations PDF (99KB)
| Properties: | Title: U.S. Department of Education FY 2016 Annual Performance Report and FY 2018 Annual Performance Plan |
|-------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|        | Author:  U.S.  Department of Education, Office of the Chief Financial Officer                             |

 

----

 

 Printable view

## How Do I Find...

          - Student loans, forgiveness
          - College accreditation
          - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
          - FERPA
          - FAFSA
          - 1098, tax forms

More >

## Information About...

          - Transforming Teaching
          - Family and Community Engagement
          - Early Learning

 

|  |
|--|
|  |
|  | President's Education Budget Request |  |
|  |
|  | Budget Tables |  |
|  |
|  | Budget News |  |
|  |
|  | ED Budget Process and Calendar |  |
|  |

----

*Our mission*

Student Loans
Repaying LoansDefaulted LoansLoan ForgivenessLoan Servicers

Grants & Programs
Apply for Pell GrantsGrants ForecastApply for a GrantEligibility for Grants

Laws & Guidance
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)FERPACivil RightsNew IDEA Website

Data & Research
Education StatisticsPostsecondary Education DataED Data ExpressNation's Report CardWhat Works Clearinghouse

About Us
Contact UsED OfficesJobsPress ReleasesFAQsRecursos en españolBudget, PerformancePrivacy ProgramSubscribe to E-Mail Updates

----

          - Notices
          - FOIA
          - Privacy Policy
          - Accessibility
          - Security
          - Information quality
          - Inspector General
          - Whitehouse.gov
          - USA.gov
          - Benefits.gov
          - Regulations.gov
#### STATE v. ROGERS

No. 583P97

Case below: 121 N.C.App. 273

Petition by defendant for writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 5 February 1998.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22-6023

ALONZA DENNIS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

CHARLES WILLIAMS, Warden PCI; BRYAN P. STIRLING, SCDC Director; 

HENRY DARGAN MCMASTER,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at 

Greenville. Joseph Dawson, III, District Judge. (6:21-cv-00964-JD)

Submitted: November 22, 2022 Decided: November 28, 2022

Before HARRIS and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit 

Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Alonza Dennis, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 22-6023 Doc: 15 Filed: 11/28/2022 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Alonza Dennis appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of 

the magistrate judge and dismissing Dennis’ 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action with prejudice under 

28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B), 1915A. Confining our review to the issues raised in the 

informal brief, see 4th Cir. R. 34(b); Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) 

(“The informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is 

limited to issues preserved in that brief.”), we have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. Dennis v. Williams,

No. 6:21-cv-00964-JD (D.S.C. Dec. 8, 2021). We dispense with oral argument because 

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court 

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

USCA4 Appeal: 22-6023 Doc: 15 Filed: 11/28/2022 Pg: 2 of 2
1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

In re Innovatio IP Ventures, LLC, Patent 

Litigation 

 Case No. 1:11-cv-09308 

Judge James F. Holderman 

Magistrate Judge Sidney Schenkier This Document Relates To: 

1:11-cv-09310 (originally 8:11-cv-01325 

(M.D. Fla.) 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 

 On this day, Innovatio IP Ventures, LLC, Innovatio Management, LLC and Noel 

B. Whitley (collectively, “Innovatio”) and B & B Corporate Holdings, Inc. announced to 

the Court that they have settled their respective claims for relief asserted in the abovecaptioned actions. The Court, having considered this request, is of the opinion that their 

request for dismissal should be GRANTED.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that all claims and counterclaims by Innovatio 

against Defendant and by Defendant against Innovatio in the above-captioned actions, 

including Case Nos. 1:11-cv-09308 (consolidated) and 1:11-cv-09310 (originally 8:11-

cv-01325 (M.D. Fla.)), are dismissed, with prejudice to the re-filing of same. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all attorneys’ fees, costs of court and expenses 

shall be borne by the party incurring the same. 

This is a final judgment. 

5/27/14 

_________________________________ 

James F. Holderman 

United States District Judge
1232.770-7 Clause. ( a ) The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 1252.232-71, Limitation of Government's Obligation, in— ( 1 ) Solicitations and contracts for severable services when incremental funding of a fixed-price, time-and-material, or labor-hour contract due to a CR is anticipated; or
( 2 ) Contracts or orders for severable services when incremental funding of a fixed-price, time-and-material, or labor-hour contract is authorized and DOT or its operating administrations are operating under a CR (*see* 1232.770-4).
( b ) The contracting officer shall insert the information required in paragraphs (a) and (c) of clause 1252.232-71. Contracting officers are authorized, in appropriate cases, to revise paragraph (a) of clause 1252.232-71 to specify the work required under the contract, in lieu of using contract line item numbers, as well as revise paragraph (c) of the clause to specify a different notification period and percentage. The 30-day period may be varied up to 90 days, and the 75 percent can be varied from 75 up to 85 percent.
April 24, 1975.

M. P. No. 75-85.

#### Providence Journal Company *v.*Rhode Island Commission for Human Rights.

*Edwards & Angelí, Richard M. Borod, Bloom, Deutsch, Rosenwald, Weintraub and Witkin,*Boston, Mass., *Robert P. Weintraub, Richard A. Perras,*of counsel, for petitioner. *Julius C. Michaelson,*Attorney General, *Gregory L. Benik,*Special Asst. Attorney General, for respondent.

Petition for writ of certiorari granted.

Joslin, J. not participating.
### Washington, Belinda (OST) From: Sent: To: 

### Cc: Subject: Attachments: Hi All, Adams, Kevin (OST) Wednesday, January 09, 2013 1:48 PM Alaska DOT, Steven D. Hatter; cityclerk@cityofcordova.net; clerk@gustavus-ak.net; clerk@ci.petersburg.ak.us; clerk@wrangell.com; YakCierk@Yakutatak.us; YakCierk@Yakutat.us Alaska DOT, Richard Sewell; Alaska DOT, Linda Bustamante ; Washington, Belinda (OST) Proposal ofAlaska Airlines at Southeast, AK 2013 Proposal ofAlaska Airlines.pdf

Attached above is a copy ofAlaska Airlines' proposal for Essential Air Service (EAS) atthe five Southeast communities: Cordova, Gustavus, Petersburg, Wrangell, and Yakutat. We are currently reviewing that proposal. The attached proposal is directlyfrom the carrier and will be in the Docket shortly, which you may access through Regulations.gov at DOT-OST-1998-4899, along with other pertinent information on this proceeding. Communitycomments are a critically important element in our carrier selection decision. We ask thatyou get back to us, preferably by email, no laterthan January 31, 2013. We will docketthis email, as well as any replies. In brief, look atthe proposal, and ifyou have any questions, give me a buzz. Otherwise get back to us by the deadline. Best, Kevin Adams 202-366-1047

1
----

----

**UNITED STATES****SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION****Washington, D.C. 20549**

**                                          **

**FORM 10-K**

*(Mark One)*

| **[ X ]** | **ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934** |
|---------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                |
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

)

JOHN H. VAN STEDUM,

Plaintiff,

 v.

NICHOLAS MARGIARACINA and HELEN 

MARGIARACINA D/B/A THE LAMPLITER 

and LAMP LITER, INC. D/B/A THE 

LAMPLITER

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 12 cv 00644

Hon. Edmund E. Chang

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), Plaintiff John Van Stedum 

hereby stipulates, through his court-appointed counsel, and requests this Court to order, that the 

above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed with prejudice. The parties are to bear their own 

costs and attorneys' fees.

Dated: May 31, 2013 /s/ Mark E. Rakoczy

Mark E. Rakoczy

155 N. Wacker Drive

Chicago, IL 60606

Tel. No.: (312) 407-0764

E-Mail: mark.rakoczy@skadden.com

Attorney for John Van Stedum

Case: 1:12-cv-00644 Document #: 31 Filed: 05/31/13 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:71
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, Mark E. Rakoczy, hereby certify that on May 31, 2013, I caused this STIPULATION 

OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE to be electronically filed with the Clerk of the District 

Court using the CM/ECF system and copy to be mailed to:

Daniel G. O'Day, Esq., P.C.

Cusack Gilfillan & O'Day, LLC

415 Hamilton Boulevard

Peoria, IL 61602.

/s/ Mark E. Rakoczy

Mark E. Rakoczy

155 N. Wacker Drive

Chicago, IL 60606

Tel. No.: (312) 407-0764

E-Mail: mark.rakoczy@skadden.com

Attorney for John Van Stedum

Case: 1:12-cv-00644 Document #: 31 Filed: 05/31/13 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:72
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           2,726
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,756
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,591
<INVENTORY>                                     12,643
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                31,674
<PP&E>                                           5,063
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,342
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  55,736
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           19,900
<BONDS>                                         20,750
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      7,214
<COMMON>                                           441
<OTHER-SE>                                       7,176
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    55,736
<SALES>                                         73,036
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                75,543
<CGS>                                           67,186
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   67,186
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,775
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  (66)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,399
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (662)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        41
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (703)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (703)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .03
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>
   
<ARTICLE>               5   
<MULTIPLIER>             1,000   
          
<S>                     <C>   
<PERIOD-TYPE>           12-MOS   
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>       Nov-30-1996   
<PERIOD-START>          Dec-01-1995   
<PERIOD-END>            Nov-30-1996   
<CASH>                          142   
<SECURITIES>                      0   
<RECEIVABLES>                  1601   
<ALLOWANCES>                    (73)   
<INVENTORY>                    2079   
<CURRENT-ASSETS>               3865   
<PP&E>                          649   
<DEPRECIATION>                  485   
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                 4105   
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           1837   
<BONDS>                           0   
<COMMON>                        131   
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>             0   
<PREFERRED>                       0   
<OTHER-SE>                     2136   
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>   4105   
<SALES>                       16484   
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              16518   
<CGS>                         11433   
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 15712   
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                  0   
<LOSS-PROVISION>                  0   
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              118   
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 806   
<INCOME-TAX>                    268   
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             538   
<DISCONTINUED>                    0   
<EXTRAORDINARY>                   0   
<CHANGES>                         0   
<NET-INCOME>                    538   
<EPS-PRIMARY>                   .05   
<EPS-DILUTED>                   .05   
           

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

Lashonda Ash,

 Plaintiff,

v.

Global Recovery Systems, Inc.,

Defendant.

Case No. 1:11-cv-09094

NOTICE OF DISMISSAL

WITH PREJUDICE

Now comes Plaintiff, by and through counsel, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 

Procedure 41(a), and hereby dismisses the present with prejudice. This notice is being filed 

before Defendant has served an answer and therefore is appropriate for dismissal absent 

stipulation by all parties.

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,

Meier LLC

By: /s/ Richard J. Meier

Richard J. Meier, Esq.

53 w. Jackson Blvd, Suite 709

Chicago, IL 60604

Tel: 312-242-1849

Fax: 312-242-1841

richard@meierllc.com

Attorney for Plaintiff

Case: 1:11-cv-09094 Document #: 9 Filed: 04/19/12 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:14
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on a copy of the foregoing Notice was filed electronically. Notice of 

this filing will be sent by operation of the Court’s electronic filing system to all parties indicated 

on the electronic filing receipt. The following party was served via regular U.S. Mail:

Global Recovery Systems, Inc.

a/k/a GRS Management

c/o Inna Verona, registered agent

3363 NE 163 Street, Suite 204

Miami, FL 33179

/s/ Richard J. Meier

Case: 1:11-cv-09094 Document #: 9 Filed: 04/19/12 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:15
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

March 24, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
129825 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan KENNETH KARACZEWSKI, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 129825 COA: 256172 WCAC: 02-000480 FARBMAN STEIN & COMPANY and NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendants-Appellants.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 18, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is GRANTED. The parties shall include among the issues addressed wh ether appellants’ proposed overruling of Boyd v W G Wade Shows, 443 Mich 515 (1993), is justified under the sta ndard for applying stare decisis discussed in Robinson v City of Detroit, 462 Mich 439, 463-468 (2000).

t0321 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

March 24, 2006

Clerk
----

|   | 1. | The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the period ended December 31, 2009, (the "Annual Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                          |   |
|-------------------------------|--------|
|                          |   |
| /s/ Paul O. Koether           |   |
| Paul O. Koether               |   |
|  Chief Executive Officer |   |
|                          |   |
|                          |   |
| /s/ Bryan P. Healey           |   |
| Bryan P. Healey               |   |
| Chief Financial Officer       |   |

----
```

[110th Congress Public Law 270]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ270.110]

[[Page 122 STAT. 2489]]

Public Law 110-270
110th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
117 North Kidd Street in Ionia, Michigan, as the ``Alonzo Woodruff Post 
       Office Building''. <<NOTE: July 15, 2008 -  [H.R. 5479]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. ALONZO WOODRUFF POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 117 North Kidd Street in Ionia, Michigan, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Alonzo Woodruff Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Alonzo 
Woodruff Post Office Building''.

    Approved July 15, 2008.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 5479:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 154 (2008):
            Apr. 23, considered and passed House.
            June 27, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```