alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Nora O’Connell, as Administratrix of the Estate of Joseph K. O’Connell, Deceased, Respondent, v. Enterprise Paper Corp. et al., Appellants. New Amsterdam Motor Transportation Corp., Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent.

In an action to recover damages for wrongful death, the defendants Enterprise Paper Corporation and James Hargett, and the defendant and third-party plaintiff New Amsterdam Motor Transportation Corp. appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered June 19,1961 after a jury trial, which awarded damages to the plaintiff against them as defendants, and which dismissed the third-party complaint of the defendant New Amsterdam Motor Transportation Corp. against Consolidated Edison Company. Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Brennan and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
330 A.2d 897.

#### State *vs.*Timothy Bianculli.

JANUARY 24, 1975.

Present: Roberts, C. J., Paolino, Joslin, Kelleher and Doris, JJ.

*218Per Curiam.

On January 22, 1974, this court granted the defendant’s petition for certiorari to review in advance of trial the denial of his motion to dismiss certain indictments on the ground that the defendant had been deprived thereby of his right to a speedy trial. We issued the writ without prejudice to the right of the state to renew its objections to the issuance of the writ at the hearing on the merits. *State*v. *Bianculli,*112 R. I. 938, 313 A.2d 667 (1974).

Pursuant to the writ the records in the case were certified to this court, and an examination thereof discloses a total absence of any evidence tending to establish that defendant’s contentions raise special or unusual circumstances or conditions sufficient to take the case out of our well-settled principle that this court will not review a ■cause piecemeal. *See State*v. *Paradis,*66 R. I. 152, 18 A.2d 342 (1941). It is our conclusion, then, that the writ was improvidently issued and must be quashed.

Because we take this view, we do not reach the question of whether in the circumstances here the defendant was, by reason of the trial justice’s denial of his motion, deprived of a speedy trial. It is clear that the defendant’s interests in having that issue determined will be adequately protected by a review on direct appeal if he is convicted at trial.

The petition for certiorari is denied and dismissed, the writ heretofore issued is quashed, and the records certified *219are ordered returned to the Superior Court for further proceedings.

*Aram K. Berberian,*for petitioner.

*Richard J. Israel,*Attorney General, *Donald P. Ryan,*Asst. Attorney General, for respondent.
### §5213. Joint development assistance agreements with certain trading partners

#### (a) Development of plan

With respect to any country that has a substantial positive trade balance with the United States, the Secretary of Agriculture, in consultation with the Secretary of State and (through the Secretary of State) representatives of such country, may develop an appropriate plan under which that country would purchase United States agricultural commodities or products for use in development activities in developing countries. In developing such plan, the Secretary of Agriculture shall take into consideration the agricultural economy of such country, the nature and extent of such country's programs to assist developing countries, and other relevant factors. The Secretary of Agriculture shall submit each such plan to the President as soon as practicable.

#### (b) Agreement

The President may enter into an agreement with any country that has a positive trade balance with the United States under which that country would purchase United States agricultural commodities or products for use in agreed-on development activities in developing countries.

(Pub. L. 100–418, title IV, §4203, Aug. 23, 1988, 102 Stat. 1392.)
Order Form (01/2005)

United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois

Name of Assigned Judge

or Magistrate Judge Samuel Der-Yeghiayan Sitting Judge if Otherthan Assigned Judge

CASE NUMBER 12 C 324 DATE 1/24/2012

CASE

TITLE

Sheik Abdul-Musawwir Shakoor-Bey vs. James M. Obbish, et al.

DOCKET ENTRY TEXT

For the reasons stated below, the instant action is hereby ordered dismissed. Plaintiff’s motion for leave to

proceed in forma pauperis [4] is denied as moot. Civil case terminated.

O[ For further details see text below.] Docketing to mail notices.

STATEMENT

This matter is before the court on Plaintiff Sheik Abdul-Musawuir Shakoor-Bey’s (Shakoor-Bey)

motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) (Section 1915(e)),

“[n]otwithstanding any filing fee, or any portion thereof, that may have been paid, the court shall dismiss the

case at any time if the court determines that . . . the action . . . fails to state a claim on which relief may be

granted. . . .” Id. Shakoor-Bey has filed a complaint pro se, and thus the court construes the complaint

liberally. McCormick v. City of Chicago, 230 F.3d 319, 325 (7th Cir. 2000)(stating that “pro se complaints

are to be liberally construed and not held to the stringent standards expected of pleadings drafted by

lawyers”). 

In his pro se complaint, Shakoor-Bey alleges that he is a Moorish American National. Shakoor-Bey

also alleges that on February 11, 2011, Chicago Police Officers arrested him, fingerprinted him, and charged

him with a crime under the name Abul Masww Bey, which he claims is “fictitious.” (Compl. 4). ShakoorBey further alleges that the state prosecuted him for a crime and that such prosecution was an

“unlawful/illegal denationalization tactic[]” done “to extract riches of this world.” (Compl. 4). In addition,

Shakoor-Bey alleges that, as a foreign citizen, any proceeding against him initiated by the state, including

12C324 Sheik Abdul-Musawwir Shakoor-Bey vs. James M. Obbish, et al. Page 1 of 2
STATEMENT

criminal proceedings, “must originate in the Supreme Court of the United States;” otherwise, the state has

committed a tort against him. (Compl. 2). Shakoor-Bey has sued for injunctive relief and $100,000.00 in

compensatory and punitive damages. 

Not only are Shakoor-Bey’s claims based upon an incorrect reading of the United States Constitution,

his claims are also dependent upon his assertion that he is a foreign citizen by virtue of his membership in the

Moorish Science Temple of America. The Seventh Circuit has clearly rejected such arguments. See, e.g.,

United States v. James, 328 F.3d 953, 954 (7th Cir. 2003). In addition, to the extent that Shakoor-Bey is

seeking to appeal a state court criminal conviction, this court is not the proper forum for such an appeal. 

Even when construed liberally, Shakoor-Bey’s complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief may be

granted. Therefore, based on the above, the instant action is dismissed, and Shakoor-Bey’s motion for leave

to proceed in forma pauperis is denied as moot. 

12C324 Sheik Abdul-Musawwir Shakoor-Bey vs. James M. Obbish, et al. Page 2 of 2
130 FY 2019 AGENCY FINANCIAL REPORT | U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

THE DEPARTMENT STRATEGY IS TO:

 Renew workspaces including sit-stand desks and 

ergonomic chairs.

 Allow more natural light into workspaces by providing 

more open workspace.

 Improve use of shared, common, and multi–

functional spaces.

 Enhance technology.

 Provide electronic file storage and reduce paper file 

storage, resulting in a reduced footprint.

The square footage totals are for the office and warehouse 

domestic assets, which are assets located in the 50 states, 

Washington, D.C., and United States territories. The 

square footage total includes owned and leased assets. The 

Department does not own any assets; they are all leased. 

Updated square footage information is posted on the 

performance.gov website.

REDUCE THE FOOTPRINT

The Department’s Space Modernization Program 

strives to bring a new approach to its workplaces: 

by building greater employee performance and 

productivity through innovative space designs and 

technology enhancements, while reducing the agency’s space 

footprint and associated out-year costs. The Reduce the 

Footprint effort will allow the agency to meet the federal 

space guidelines (150–180 usable square footage per person 

vs. the current usable square footage per person of 338).

THE DEPARTMENT CHALLENGES ARE:

 If requested funding is not received, future planned 

projects will be at risk. As a result, the Department 

may be faced with future increased rent payments while 

continuing to occupy oversized, inefficient space. 

 Existing lease terms of several properties restrict the 

Department’s movement to more efficient space.

Table 8. Reduce the Footprint Baseline Comparison

FY 2015 Baseline FY 2018 Change (FY 2015 Baseline to FY 2018)

Usable Area, or 

Usable Square 

Footage per Person

1,548,425 1,382,553 (165,872)
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

THE SECRETARY

MEMORANDUM

TO: The Inspector General 

FROM: The Secretary

SUBJECT: Delegation of Authority

I. DELEGATION

Under the authority vested in me by Section 412 of the Department of Education 

Organization Act, 20 U.S.C. § 3472, I hereby delegate to you, to your successor in 

function, or to anyone serving for you in an acting capacity, the Secretary’s authority as 

detailed in Personnel Manual Instruction (PMI) 451-1, Department of Education 

Incentive Awards Program, dated May 26, 2006, to approve special act awards and 

performance awards up to $10,000 and time-off awards for employees within the Office 

of Inspector General.

II. CONDITIONS

OIG shall follow the principles I have established for approving awards as outlined in 

PMI 451-1. 

III. RESERVATIONS

None.

IV. REDELEGATION

This authority may not be redelegated.

V. CERTIFICATION AND EFFECTIVE DATE

This delegation is effective upon certification by the Department’s Principal Delegations 

Control Officer.

 

____________/s/__________________

 Arne Duncan

OGC Clearance and Date: /s/ David Berthiaume, 7/22/2010

Certified Date: 7/26/2010

Departmental Delegations Control Officer: /s/ Naty G. Beetle

Control Number: EA/EF/189
Docket Number FAA-2014-0447

Contacts. With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed?

Organization Person Contacted Date Response

Transport

Canada

Anthony Wan 07/29/2013 No objection
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Fred Smith, Jr., Appellant, against Robert E. Murphy, as Warden of Auburn Prison, Respondent.

Motion for leave to prosecute appeal as a poor person granted. The appeal may be perfected upon one typewritten copy of the record and five typewritten copies of the brief. Motion, in all other respects, denied. Present — Bergan, P. J., Coon, Gibson, Herlihy and Reynolds, JJ.
#### 1352.228-73 Loss of or damage to leased aircraft

As prescribed in 48 CFR 1328.310-70(e) and 1328.310-70(f), insert the following clause:

# Loss of or Damage to Leased Aircraft (APR 2010)

(a) The Government assumes all risk of loss of, or damage (except normal wear and tear) to, the leased aircraft during the term of this lease while the aircraft is in the possession of the Government.

(b) In the event of damage to the aircraft, the Government, at its option, shall make the necessary repairs with its own facilities or by contract, or pay the contractor the reasonable cost of repair of the aircraft.

(c) In the event the aircraft is lost or damaged beyond repair, the Government shall pay the contractor a sum equal to the fair market value of the aircraft at the time of such loss or damage, which value may be specifically agreed to in clause 1252.228-74, *Fair Market Value of Aircraft,* less the salvage value of the aircraft. However, the Government may retain the damaged aircraft or dispose of it as it wishes. In that event, the contractor will be paid the fair market value of the aircraft as stated in the clause.

(d) The contractor agrees that the contract price does not include any cost attributable to hull insurance or to any reserve fund it has established to protect its interest in the aircraft. If, in the event of loss or damage to the leased aircraft, the contractor receives compensation for such loss or damage in any form from any source, the amount of such compensation shall be:

(1) Credited to the Government in determining the amount of the Government's liability; or

(2) For an increment of value of the aircraft beyond the value for which the Government is responsible.

(e) In the event of loss of or damage to the aircraft, the Government shall be subrogated to all rights of recovery by the contractor against third parties for such loss or damage and the contractor shall promptly assign such rights in writing to the Government.

(End of clause)

[75 FR 10570, Mar. 8, 2010; 75 FR 14496, Mar. 26, 2010]
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Synthetic Blood International, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for
the period ended January 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert W. Nicora, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|               |  |                                      
|-------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|March 19, 2007 |  | /s/ Robert W. Nicora                 
|               |  | Robert W. Nicora                     
|               |  | President and Chief Executive Officer

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Synthetic Blood International, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended January 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, David H. Johnson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|               |  |                        
|-------------- |  | -----------------------
|March 19, 2007 |  | /s/ David H. Johnson   
|               |  | David H. Johnson       
|               |  | Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Synthetic Blood
International, Inc. and will be retained by Synthetic Blood International, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 583 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.583

                     One Hundred Fifteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
          the third day of January, two thousand and seventeen

                                 An Act

 
   To amend the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 to 
 authorize COPS grantees to use grant funds to hire veterans as career 
            law enforcement officers, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
    This Act may be cited as the ``American Law Enforcement Heroes Act 
of 2017''.
SEC. 2. PRIORITIZING HIRING AND TRAINING OF VETERANS.
    Section 1701(b)(2) of title I of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe 
Streets Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 3796dd(b)(2)) is amended by inserting 
``, including by prioritizing the hiring and training of veterans (as 
defined in section 101 of title 38, United States Code)'' after 
``Nation''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Esterline Technologies
Corporation (the "COMPANY") on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended January 28, 2005
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"FORM 10-Q/A"), I, Robert D. George, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Form 10-Q/A fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

      (2) The information contained in the Form 10-Q/A fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: January 6, 2006      By: /s/ Robert D. George
                                -----------------------------------------------
                                               Robert D. George
                                    Vice President, Chief Financial Officer,
                                            Secretary and Treasurer
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                           5
<LEGEND>

This schedule  contains  summary  financial  information  extracted from Angeles
Partners X 1999  Fourth  Quarter  10-KSB and is  qualified  in its  entirety  by
reference to such 10-KSB filing.

</LEGEND>

<CIK>                               0000317900
<NAME>                              Angeles Partners X
<MULTIPLIER>                               1,000


<S>                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                      JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                        DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                     1,088
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                241
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0 <F1>
<PP&E>                                     9,337
<DEPRECIATION>                             6,634
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             4,350
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0 <F1>
<BONDS>                                    8,750
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                (4,704)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               4,350
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           5,292
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           2,692
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           802
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              (66)
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                               2,534
<EPS-BASIC>                               126.50 <F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>

<F1> Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet. <F2> Multiplier is 1.

</FN>


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 10 (Friday, January 15, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 4169]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-00794]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Delegation of Authority No. 354-2]


Delegation of Authority to the Principal Officer at Post of 
Certain Authorities Regarding Debt Collection and Waiver of Claims

Section 1. Delegation

    By virtue of the authority vested in the Secretary of State by the 
laws and authorities of the United States, including those set forth in 
22 U.S.C. 2651a; the Debt Collection Improvement Act of 1996, Public 
Law 104-134 (1996); the Office of Management and Budget's Determination 
with Respect to Transfer of Functions Pursuant to Public Law 104-316 
(December 17, 1996); the Travel and Transportation Reform Act of 1998, 
Public Law 105-264 (1998); 5 U.S.C. 4108, 5379, 5514, 5522, 5524a, 
5705, 5922, and 8707; 22 U.S.C. 2671, 2716, 4047 and 4071; and 31 
U.S.C. Chapter 37, and delegated to the Comptroller by Delegation of 
Authority 354, dated April 23, 2013, I hereby delegate, to the extent 
authorized by law, authority to approve the compromise, suspension, 
termination of Department of State collection, advance decision, 
settlement or waiver of claims of or against debtors of the Department 
of State not in excess of $500 originating at post to the Principal 
Officer at post.

Section 2. General Provisions

    (a) The Secretary of State, the Deputy Secretary, the Deputy 
Secretary for Management and Resources, the Under Secretary for 
Management, or the Comptroller may at any time exercise any function 
delegated by this delegation of authority. Functions delegated herein 
may not be re-delegated.
    (b) Any reference in this delegation of authority to any act, 
executive order, determination, delegation of authority, regulation, or 
procedure shall be deemed to be a reference to such act, executive 
order, determination, delegation of authority, regulation, or procedure 
as amended from time to time.
    (c) This Delegation of Authority shall be published in the Federal 
Register.

    Dated: December 14, 2020.
Jeffrey C. Mounts,
Comptroller, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2021-00794 Filed 1-14-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-37-P