alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Opinion issued May 12, 2015.

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-15-00171-CV

NO. 01-15-00172-CV

———————————

IN RE MELISSA A. PULSIPHER, Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator, Melissa A. Pulsipher, seeks mandamus relief from the January 26, 

2015 “Order for Protection of a Child in an Emergency” in cause number 

15CP0007, which appointed the Texas Department of Family and Protective 

Services (DFPS) as temporary sole managing conservator of her two minor 
2

children, J.O. and A.L.G.1 Pulsipher contends the order was an abuse of discretion 

by the trial court because it was issued on the same day that cause number 

13CP0049, an earlier termination suit involving the same parties, was dismissed 

for having exceeded legislative time limits. Pulsipher argues the children should 

have been returned to her because no new evidence existed to support the new 

termination case. 

We DENY the petition for writ of mandamus. We dismiss any pending 

motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Brown and Lloyd.

 

1

The underlying cases are In the Interest of J.O. and A.L.G., Children, cause 

number 15CP0007, and In the Interest of J.O. and A.L.G., Children, cause number 

13CP0049, pending in the 306th District Court of Galveston County, Texas, the 

Honorable Anne B. Darring presiding.
### §506. Returns under oath; administration

The returns provided for in this chapter shall be made under oath before a collector or deputy collector of internal revenue, a postmaster, assistant postmaster, or anyone authorized to administer oaths by State or Federal law.

(Jan. 14, 1929, ch. 69, §6, 45 Stat. 1080.)

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Abolition of Offices and Transfer of Functions

See note under section 505 of this title.
Michael Baker 

INTERNATIONAL 

August 17. 2015 

U.S. Department ofT ransportation 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Flight Standards Services 

800 Independence Avenue SW 

Washington, DC 20591 

RE: Exemption No.11711. Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2015-om 

Mr. JohnS. Duncan: 

We Make o Difference 

Thank you for granting Michael Baker International. LLC its request for exemption. Although our 

approved petition dated March 19 and April30. 20151ists Michael Baker International. LLC as the 

petitioner, we intend to operate unmanned aircraft system (UAS) to conduct aerial photography for 

aerial mapping (photogrammetry) and video documentations as Michael Baker International. Inc. Listing 

Michael Baker International. LLC was a clerical error. 

Michael Baker International Inc. is a wholly owned subsidiary of Michael Baker International Holdco 

Corporation. Michael Baker International Holdco Corporation is a wholly owned subsidiary of Michael 

Baker International LLC. We only wish reflect the proper entity, Michael Baker International, Inc., as the 

entity holding the exemption. We do not wish to change our intended operations of the UAS as set forth 

in our le.tters dated March 19 and April30. 2015. By this letter we request amending said granted 

exemptioh.to reflect approval to operate as Michael Baker International. Inc. 

Respectfully, 

Robert Hanson 

Senior Vice President 

MBAKERINTL.COM 

4431 N. Front Street. 2"" Floor I Harrisburg. PA 17110 

Office: 717.221.2000 I Fax: 717.234.7611
Exhibit 99(b)





CERTIFICATE REGARDINGPPL CORPORATION'S 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2002





In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of PPL Corporation
  (the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities
  and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Covered Report"), I, the principal
  financial officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant
  to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify that:





| | · | The Covered Report fully complies with the requirements
      of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
      and                   
| | - | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |   |                                                                                                                                                                         
| | · | The information contained in the Covered Report
      fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
      of operations of the Company.





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have executed this certificate as of
  this 3rd day of March, 2003.













| | /s/ John R. BiggarJohn R. Biggar
      Executive Vice President and
      Chief Financial Officer
      PPL Corporation
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. John J. Mulligan, Appellant, against Robert E. Murphy, as Warden of Auburn Prison, Respondent.

Motion to prosecute appeal as a poor person, and for other relief, denied on the ground that the papers fail to show merit to the appeal.
UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C.  20549



FORM 6-K

REPORT OF FOREIGN PRIVATE ISSUER

PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-16 OR 15d-16

UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934



Dated March 16, 2007



Commission File Number: 001-14666



MITTAL STEEL COMPANY N.V.

(Translation of registrants name into English)



15th Floor, Hofplein 20

3032 AC Rotterdam

The Netherlands

(Address of principal executive offices)



Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports under cover Form 20-F or Form 40-F.



Form 20-FxForm 40-Fo



Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1): _____



Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7): _____



Indicate by check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the information contained in this Form is also thereby furnishing the information to the Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.



YesoNox

If Yes marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the registrant in connection with Rule 12g3-2(b):  82-________












---



On March 16, 2007, Mittal Steel Company N.V. issued the press releases attached hereto as Exhibits 99.1 and 99.2. This report on Form 6-K is hereby incorporated by reference into Mittal Steel Company N.V.s registration statement on Form F-3 (File No. 333-140846) and into the prospectus/consent solicitation statement dated February 23, 2007.



Exhibit List



Exhibit No.
        DescriptionExhibit 99.1
        Press release dated March 16, 2007, announcing that Arcelor Mittal is to build a new service centre in Krakow (Poland).Exhibit 99.2
        Press release dated March 16, 2007, announcing the signing of a definitive agreement between Arcelor Mittal and Noble International, for the strategic business combination of laser welding business.

































---



SIGNATURES



Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.



Date: March 16, 2007



| | By: | /s/ Henk Scheffer
| | --- | -----------------
| |     | Name:            
| |     | Title:           


















---



Exhibit Index



Exhibit No.
        DescriptionExhibit 99.1
        Press release dated March 16, 2007, announcing that Arcelor Mittal is to build a new service centre in Krakow (Poland).Exhibit 99.2
        Press release dated March 16, 2007, announcing the signing of a definitive agreement between Arcelor Mittal and Noble International, for the strategic business combination of laser welding business.
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-11268

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

AUDREY VARNER,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:97-CR-86-5

- - - - - - - - - -

June 30, 1998

Before DUHÉ, DEMOSS, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Audrey Varner appeals from her conviction and sentence for

importation of cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952(a),

960(a)(1), and 960(b)(2)(B). She contends that the district court

erred: 1) in its attribution of drug quantity for purposes of

assessing relevant conduct; 2) by denying her request for an

adjustment in her offense level based on her minor role in the

offense; and 3) by denying her request for a downward departure

based on her disadvantaged upbringing. We have reviewed the record
No. 97-11268

-2-

and the briefs of the parties, and conclude that no reversible

error was committed. The district court did not clearly err either

in its attribution of the relevant drug quantity or in its denial

of Varner’s request for an adjustment based on her minor role. See

United States v. Edwards, 65 F.3d 430, 432 (5th Cir. 1995); United

States v. Buenrostro, 868 F.2d 135, 137-38 (5th Cir. 1989).

Additionally, because the district court’s decision to not depart

from the applicable guidelines range based on Varner’s

disadvantaged upbringing was a correct application of the

guidelines, the court’s decision is unreviewable on appeal. See

United States v. DiMarco, 46 F.3d 476, 478 (5th Cir. 1995).

AFFIRMED.
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

November 29, 2017

No. 04

- 17

- 00704

- CV

Russell AMSBERRY

, Appellant

v.
Alejandra SALAZAR

, Appellee

From the 37th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2011

- CI

- 17196 The Honorable Angelica Jimenez, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

The trial court signed an Order Confirming Award & Final Judgment on July 13, 2017. Appellant filed a timely motion for reconsideration on August 11, 2017. Therefore, the notice of appeal was due to be filed on October 11, 2017

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 26.1(a). A motion for extension of time to file the notice of appeal was due on October 26, 2017

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 26.3. Although appellant filed a notice of a ppeal within the fifteen

- day grace period allowed by Rule 26.3, he did not file a motion for extension of time.

A motion for extension of time is necessarily implied when an appellant, acting in good faith, files a notice of appeal beyond the time allowe d by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 26.1 but within the fifteen

- day grace period provided by Rule 26.3 for filing a motion for extension of time. See Verburgt v. Dorner , 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997) (construing the predecessor to Rule 26). However, t he appellant must offer a reasonable explanation for failing to file the notice of appeal in a timely manner. See id. ; T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 26.3, 10.5(b)(1)(C).

We, therefore, ORDER appellant to file, within fifteen days from the date of this order, a
respo nse presenting a reasonable explanation for failing to file the notice of appeal in a timely manner. If appellant fails to respond within the time provided, the appeal will be dismissed. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.3(c).

_________________________________ Karen Angelini, JusticeIN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 29th day of November, 2 017

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Russell V. Florence, Treasurer of Equity Oil Company, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Equity Oil Company;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange
Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

> a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
>   and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
>   relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
>   by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is
>   being prepared;
>   b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
>   procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
>   disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
>   based on such evaluation; and
>   c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
>   financial reporting that occurred during the registrants first fiscal quarter ending
>   March 31, 2003 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
>   affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

> a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
>   internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
>   the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
>   information; and

> b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
>   have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
>   reporting.

|Date: | May 12, 2004 | By                                                             | /s/ Russell V. Florence
|----- | ------------ | -------------------------------------------------------------- | -----------------------
|      |              | Russell V. Florence, Treasurer
    and Chief Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-1015

ALFRED LOCKLEAR; GWEN D. LOCKLEAR,

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

versus

BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS/BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF

HOKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA; L. E. MCLAUGHLIN,

personally; TOM HOWELL, personally; RILEY

JORDAN, personally; DUNCAN MCFADYEN, former

Hoke County Attorney; JAMES C. SPENCER, JR.,

the Honorable; JERRI DUNSTON, Attorney, United

States Department of Justice; SARA MCDONALD,

personally; DAVID GIBSON, personally,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. Frank W. Bullock, Jr., Chief

District Judge. (CA-97-1277-1)

Submitted: May 13, 1999 Decided: May 18, 1999

Before WIDENER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
2

Alfred Locklear, Gwen D. Locklear, Appellants Pro Se. Tyrus Vance

Dahl, Jr., WOMBLE, CARLYLE, SANDRIDGE & RICE, Winston-Salem, North

Carolina; Charles Jerome Murray, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF

NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina; Gill Paul Beck, OFFICE OF

THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greensboro, North Carolina; Lawrence

Pierce Egerton, EGERTON & ASSOCIATES, Greensboro, North Carolina,

for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Alfred and Gwen Locklear appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on their civil action raising claims under the Fair

Housing Act and 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. See Locklear v. Board of Commissioners, No. CA-97-

1277-1 (M.D.N.C. Dec. 1, 1998). We deny the Locklears’ motion to

appoint counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
12.202 Market research and description of agency need. ( a ) Market research (see 10.001) is an essential element of building an effective strategy for the acquisition of commercial products and commercial services and establishes the foundation for the agency description of need (see part 11), the solicitation, and resulting contract.
( b ) The description of agency need must contain sufficient detail for potential offerors of commercial products or commercial services to know which products or commercial services may be suitable. Generally, for acquisitions in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, an agency's statement of need for a commercial product or commercial service will describe the type of commercial product or commercial service to be acquired and explain how the agency intends to use the product or service in terms of function to be performed, performance requirement or essential physical characteristics. Describing the agency's needs in these terms allows offerors to propose methods that will best meet the needs of the Government.
( c ) Follow the procedures in subpart 11.2 regarding the identification and availability of specifications, standards and commercial item descriptions.
( d ) Requirements documents shall identify the applicable information and communication technology accessibility standards at 36 CFR 1194.1 (see 11.002(f) and subpart 39.2).
( e ) When acquiring information technology using Internet Protocol, agencies must include the appropriate Internet Protocol compliance requirements in accordance with 11.002(g).
[60 FR 48241, Sept. 18, 1995, as amended at 62 FR 264, Jan. 2, 1997; 66 FR 20897, Apr. 25, 2001; 74 FR 65607, Dec. 10, 2009; 86 FR 44232, Aug. 11, 2021; 86 FR 61022, Nov. 4, 2021]
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
                                                                    Exhibit 12(a)

PP&L RESOURCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

(Millions of Dollars)
<CAPTION>
                                           1997     1996     1995     1994     1993
<S>                                      <C>      <C>      <C>      <C>      <C>
Fixed charges, as defined:
  Interest on long-term debt ............   $196     $207     $213     $214     $226
  Interest on short-term debt
     and other interest .................     25       17       18       18       13
  Amortization of debt discount, expense
    and premium - net....................      2        2        2        2        2
  Interest on capital lease
    obligations
      Charged to expense ................      9       13       15       12        9
      Capitalized .......................      2        2        2        1        1
  Estimated interest component of
    operating rentals ...................     15        8        8        6        5
  Proportionate share of fixed charges
    of 50-percent-or-less-owned
    persons .............................      1        1        1        1        1

          Total fixed charges ...........   $250     $250     $259     $254     $257

Earnings, as defined:
  Net income ............................   $296     $329     $323     $216     $314
  Preferred and Preference Stock Dividend
    Requirements.........................     24       28       28       28       34
  Less undistributed income of less
    than 50-percent-owned persons .......   -        -        -        -        -
                                             320      357      351      244      348

Add (Deduct):
  Federal income taxes ..................    169      189      195      198      163
  State income taxes ....................     59       64       62       77       64
  Deferred income taxes .................     29       10       15      (45)      22
  Investment tax credit - net ...........    (10)     (10)     (10)     (12)     (14)
  Income taxes on other income and
    deductions - net ....................     (9)       0       24      (38)      (1)
  Amortization of capitalized
    interest on capital leases ..........      2        4        5        9       12
  Total fixed charges as above
    (excluding capitalized interest
    on capital lease obligations) .......    248      248      257      253      256

          Total earnings ................   $808     $862     $899     $686     $850

Ratio of earnings to fixed
  charges ...............................   3.23     3.45     3.47     2.70     3.31

</TABLE>
Exhibit
32(b)


CERTIFICATE
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


FOR PPL
CORPORATION'S 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008





In
connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of PPL Corporation (the
"Company") for the year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Covered Report"), I, the
principal financial officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby
certify that:





·
            The
      Covered Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
    and·
            The
      information contained in the Covered Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.











Date:  February
      27, 2009
            /s/ Paul
      A. FarrPaul
      A. Farr
              Executive
      Vice President and
              Chief
      Financial Officer
              PPL
      Corporation





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.