alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Angeles
Partners X 1996 Year-End 10-KSB and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
such 10-KSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000317900
<NAME> ANGELES PARTNERS X
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                             378
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                          19,898
<DEPRECIATION>                                (11,917)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   9,435
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                         18,774
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (10,845)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     9,435
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,575
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,379
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,869
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (804)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (804)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (804)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (42.69)<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet.
<F2>Multiplier is 1.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
§ 552.59 Granting solicitation privileges. ( a ) Authorizations (permits) to solicit on Army installations will be in writing and will be valid for periods of 1 year or less.
( b ) Particular caution must be taken when granting solicitation permission. The impression that permission is official indorsement or that the Department of the Army favors, sponsors, or recommends the companies, agents, or the policies offered for sale must not be conveyed. As continuing policy, the Department of the Army does not indorse any seller or product.
### SUBCHAPTER I—IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION AGENCIES, OFFICERS, AND STATIONS
#### 1415.606 Agency procedures.

The contact point for the receipt and coordination of unsolicited proposals is the contracting office, which will acknowledge and review the proposal contents and determine the proper activity within the bureau/office to evaluate and process the proposal. The policy or contracting office shall acknowledge unsolicited proposals and forward each one to the processing activity in an expeditious manner. Each bureau/office shall establish procedures for receipt, reproduction and disposition of unsolicited proposals consistent with the requirements of FAR 15.6.
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

About EDOFFICES

## Loan Volume Updates

Summary loan volume data on the major student loan programs administered by the U.S. Department of Education.

## Federal Student Loan Programs Data Books

Federal Student Loans Programs Data Book FY 1997 - FY 2000 HTML Version | PDF Version (1.6 MB)

Federal Student Loans Programs Data Book (tables only) FY 1997 - FY 2000

Federal Student Loan Programs Data Book for Fiscal Years 1994, 1995, 1996

## Federal Family Education Loan Programs Data - Largest Originators and Holders

More current data on loan originators, holders, as well as other data, may be found on the **Federal Student Aid Financial Partners Web site**. 

Top 100 Originators of FFEL Loans -- FY 2002-2003 Excel (42K)

Top 100 Originators of FFEL Loans -- FY 2001-2002 Excel (41K)

Top 100 Originators of FFEL Loans -- FY 2000-2001 Excel (42K)

Top 100 Holders of FFEL Loans -- FY 2001 Excel (43K)

Top 100 Originators of FFEL Loans -- FY 2000 and FY 1999

Top 100 Originators of FFEL Loans -- FY 1999 and FY 1998

Top 100 Holders of FFEL Loans -- FY 1999

Top 100 Originators of FFEL Loans -- FY 1997 and FY 1998

Top 100 Holders of FFEL Loans -- FY 1997 and FY 1998

Top

OPE Program Data | OPE Policy Page

|        |
|--------|
|   | Printable viewShare this page |
|        |

## How Do I Find...

          - Student loans, forgiveness
          - College accreditation
          - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
          - FERPA
          - FAFSA
          - 1098, tax forms

More >

## Information About...

          - Transforming Teaching
          - Family and Community Engagement
          - Early Learning

 

|  |
|--|
|  |
|  | Higher Education Policy |  |
|  |

----

*Our mission*

Student Loans
Repaying LoansDefaulted LoansLoan ForgivenessLoan Servicers

Grants & Programs
Apply for Pell GrantsGrants ForecastApply for a GrantEligibility for Grants

Laws & Guidance
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)FERPACivil RightsNew IDEA Website

Data & Research
Education StatisticsPostsecondary Education DataED Data ExpressNation's Report CardWhat Works Clearinghouse

About Us
Contact UsED OfficesJobsPress ReleasesFAQsRecursos en españolBudget, PerformancePrivacy ProgramSubscribe to E-Mail Updates

----

          - Notices
          - FOIA
          - Privacy Policy
          - Accessibility
          - Security
          - Information quality
          - Inspector General
          - Whitehouse.gov
          - USA.gov
          - Benefits.gov
          - Regulations.gov
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 668 

To nullify the effect of the recent Executive order regarding border security 

and immigration enforcement. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 15, 2017 

Mr. CARPER (for himself, Mr. BENNET, Mr. BLUMENTHAL, Mr. BOOKER, Mr. 

COONS, Ms. CORTEZ MASTO, Ms. DUCKWORTH, Mr. DURBIN, Mr. 

FRANKEN, Mrs. GILLIBRAND, Ms. HIRONO, Mr. KAINE, Mr. LEAHY, Mr. 

MARKEY, Mr. MENENDEZ, Mr. MERKLEY, Mr. MURPHY, Mrs. MURRAY, 

Mr. REED, Mr. SANDERS, Mr. VAN HOLLEN, Ms. WARREN, Mr. WYDEN, 

and Ms. HARRIS) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To nullify the effect of the recent Executive order regarding 

border security and immigration enforcement. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. RESCISSION. 

4 The provisions of Executive Order 13767 (82 Fed. 

5 Reg. 8793; January 25, 2017), entitled ‘‘Border Security 

6 and Immigration Enforcement Improvements’’, are re7 scinded and shall not have any legal effect. 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 668 IS

1 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

2 This Act shall take effect as if enacted on January 

3 25, 2017. 

Æ 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
### §1358. Local jurisdiction over immigrant stations

The officers in charge of the various immigrant stations shall admit therein the proper State and local officers charged with the enforcement of the laws of the State or Territory of the United States in which any such immigrant station is located in order that such State and local officers may preserve the peace and make arrests for crimes under the laws of the States and Territories. For the purpose of this section the jurisdiction of such State and local officers and of the State and local courts shall extend over such immigrant stations.

(June 27, 1952, ch. 477, title II, ch. 9, §288, 66 Stat. 234.)
#### 1333.104 Protests to GAO.
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

Financial AidFINANCIAL AID PROFESSIONALS

## Top Originators of FFELP Loans FY 1999 and 2000

**
**TOP 100 ORIGINATORS OF FFELP LOANS -- FY00 AND FY99(SEQUENCED FROM HIGH TO LOW ON FY00 $ OF NEW GUARANTEES)**

**$ OF NEW GUARANTEES**

**RANKINGS**

**LENDER NAME /**

**FY00**

**FY99**

**FY00**

**FY99**

**STATE/(CITY)**

CITICORPNY (PITTSFORD)

 2057.1 

1820.5 

1 

2

CHASE MANHATTAN BANKNY (GARDEN CITY)

2025.1 

1728.5 

2

3

BANK ONE OH (COLUMBUS)

 1999.8

1902.0 

3 

1

NORWEST BANK STUDENT LOAN CENTERSD (SIOUX FALLS)

 1521.9 

1501.3 

4

5 

BANK OF AMERICA CA (BREA)

 1512.9

1501.3 

5

4 

FIRST UNION NATIONAL BANK CA (SACRAMENTO)

 1231.2 

1269.8 

6

6

NATIONAL CITY BANKOH (CLEVELAND)

 886.6 

824.2 

7

7

SALLIE MAEVA (RESTON)

 860.0 

479.6 

8

10 

AMERICAN EXPRESS ED ASSURANCE COCA (SAN DIEGO)

 565.7  

321.0 

9

17 

FLEET BOSTON FINANCIAL CORPRI (PROVIDENCE)

541.1 

562.4 

10

9 

PITTSBURGH NATIONAL CORPPA (PITTSBURGH)

 534.6 

459.4 

11

11

UNION BANK & TRUST COMPANYNE (LINCOLN)

 501.7

452.4 

12

12

EDUCATIONAL FINANCE GROUPMA (SWANSEA)

482.9  

568.1

13

8

PENNA HIGHER ED ASSISTANCE AGENCYPA (HARRISBURG)

 476.1 

400.4  

14

13 

SUNTRUST BANK VA (RICHMOND)

448.6 

380.8  

15

15

U S BANK MN (ST PAUL)

 431.9 

397.8  

16

14

KEY CORPOH (CLEVELAND)

381.5  

338.4 

17

16

NORTHSTAR GUARANTEE INCMN (ST PAUL)

280.4 

165.0 

18 

26

FIRSTAR BANK WI (MILWAUKEE)

 280.3 

232.5

19

18

COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC.NC (RALEIGH)

 263.6 

193.2 

20

21 
 Printable viewShare this page  Last Modified: 08/23/2004How Do I Find...- Student loans, forgiveness
- College accreditation
- Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
- FERPA
- FAFSA
- 1098, tax forms

More >
Information About...- Transforming Teaching
- Family and Community Engagement
- Early Learning

 
Federal Student Aid*Our mission* is to promote student achievement and preparation for global competitiveness by fostering educational excellence and ensuring equal access.
Student Loans
Repaying LoansDefaulted LoansLoan ForgivenessLoan Servicers
Grants & Programs
Apply for Pell GrantsGrants ForecastApply for a GrantEligibility for Grants
Laws & Guidance
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)FERPACivil RightsNew IDEA Website
Data & Research
Education StatisticsPostsecondary Education DataED Data ExpressNation's Report CardWhat Works Clearinghouse
About Us
Contact UsED OfficesJobsPress ReleasesFAQsRecursos en españolBudget, PerformancePrivacy ProgramSubscribe to E-Mail Updates- Notices
- FOIA
- Privacy Policy
- Accessibility
- Security
- Information quality
- Inspector General
- Whitehouse.gov
- USA.gov
- Benefits.gov
- Regulations.gov
**
# OAR Box 1867

Prepped byOllie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 77 ) ll-B-13 1 Docket Number: 

# A-90-1 9

Printed 12/2/20086:27:24 AM Sheet 77 of 95 P. 1P. 2 

## A-90-1 9 ll-B-13 1 

## PENDING CONFIDENTIAL UJ i —- " l i 

# r SE P 4 1992 

## lLB2SSiIn ^

i a l Th e following informatio n i s locate * file s o f th e Director , Emissio n Standard s Division , Offic e o f Ai r Qualit yPlanning an d Standards , U . S . Environmenta l Protectio n Agency , Researc hTriangl e Park , Nort hCarolina 27711 . Thi s informatio n i s confidentia l pending fina l determinatio n b yth e Administrato r an

d i s no t availabl e fo r publi c inspection . W . Floyd , Radia n Corporation , t o Proces s Vent s Docke t A-90-19 , Novembe r 1991 , HO NNESHAP : Industry Characteristics/s-^Butylamine . 2 1 pages . CB I Documen t Contro l No . 86/23 , PPS-131 .
<PAGE>
(Deloitte &
Touche LLP
logo appears here)
                                               Exhibit 23(b)

Two Hilton Court                  Telephone: (201) 631-7000
P.O. Box 319                      Facsimile: (201) 631-7459
Parsippany, New Jersey 07054-0319


INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration 
Statement No. 33-59405 of PP&L Resources, Inc. on Form S-3 
and Registration Statement No. 33-50031 of PP&L Resources, 
Inc. on Form S-8 of our report dated February 3, 1995, 
appearing in the Annual Report on Forms 10-K of PP&L 
Resources, Inc. and Pennsylvania Power & Light Company for 
the year ended December 31, 1995.





March 1, 1996


















(Deloitte Touche
Tohmatsu International
logo appears here)
#### 1252.222-71 Strikes or Picketing Affecting Access to a DOT Facility.

As prescribed in 1222.101-71(b), insert the following clause:

# Strikes or Picketing Affecting Access to a DOT Facility (NOV 2022)

If the Contracting Officer notifies the Contractor in writing that a strike or picketing—(a) Is directed at the Contractor or subcontractor or any employee of either; and (b) Impedes or threatens to impede access by any person to a DOT facility where the site of the work is located, the Contractor shall take all appropriate action to end such strike or picketing, including, if necessary, the filing of a charge of unfair labor practice with the National Labor Relations Board or the use of other available judicial or administrative remedies.

(End of clause)
```

                        EXHIBIT 31.2

             Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification
                 By Principal Financial Officer

I, Craig R. Jones, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-K of Electro
Rent Corporation;

2.  Based on my knowledge, this Quarterly Report does not contain
any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in
all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this report;

4.  The registrant's other certifying officer and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls
and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

     a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
     caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be
     designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
     information relating to the registrant, including its
     consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
     within those entities, particularly during the period in
     which this report is being prepared;

     b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's
     disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this
     report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
     disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the
     period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's
     internal control over financial reporting that occurred
     during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the
     registrant's first fiscal quarter in the case of a quarterly
     report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
     likely to material affect the registrant's internal control
     over financial reporting; and

5.  The registrant's other certifying officer and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal
control over financial reports, to the registrant's auditors and
the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or
persons performing the equivalent functions):

     a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
     the design or operation of internal control over financial
     reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
     the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
     report financial information; and
     b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
     management or other employees who have a significant role in
     the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  October 1, 2003

                              /s/ Craig R. Jones
                              Craig R. Jones
                              Chief Financial Officer
```
### §950bb–5. Default and deobligation; deferral

#### (a) Default and deobligation

In addition to other authority under applicable law, the Secretary shall establish written procedures for all broadband programs so that, to the maximum extent practicable, the programs are administered to—

(1) recover funds from loan and grant defaults;

(2) deobligate any awards, less allowable costs that demonstrate an insufficient level of performance (including metrics determined by the Secretary) or fraudulent spending, to the extent funds with respect to the award are available in the account relating to the program established by this subchapter;

(3) award those funds, on a competitive basis, to new or existing applicants consistent with this subchapter; and

(4) minimize overlap among the programs.

#### (b) Deferral period

In determining the terms and conditions of assistance provided under this subchapter, the Secretary may establish a deferral period of not shorter than the buildout period established for the project involved in order to support the financial feasibility and long-term sustainability of the project.

(May 20, 1936, ch. 432, title VI, §606, as added Pub. L. 115–334, title VI, §6206, Dec. 20, 2018, 132 Stat. 4739.)
Fiscal Year 2014 Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies - DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

FY 2014 Title I

LEA ID District Allocation*

1100030 District of Columbia Public Schools 43,211,400

1199999 PART D SUBPART 2 22,377

* Actual amounts received by LEAs will be smaller than shown here due to State-level adjustments to Federal Title I allocations. States adjust

 allocations, for example, to reflect LEA boundary changes or the creation of new LEAs, including charter school LEAs, that are not accounted

 for in the statutory calculations. States also are permitted to reserve, for administration, up to 1 percent of the allocations they would receive

 if $14 billion were appropriated and generally must reserve 4 percent in fiscal year 2014 for school improvement activities. These 

 adjustments will reduce the actual amounts available.
#### Betty A. Conwell, an Infant, by Betty Conwell, Her Guardian ad Litem, Respondent, v. Manou Partow, Defendant, and Lillian Partow, Appellant.

In an action to recover damages for libel and slander, the defendant Lillian Partow appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated March 8, 1962, as denied with respect to her the motion made by her and by the codefendant to dismiss the “ Third ” cause of action in the complaint, pursuant to subdivision 4 of rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice, for failure to state a cause of action. Order, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Beldock, P. J., Christ, Hill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
12.501 Applicability. ( a ) This subpart applies to any contract or subcontract at any tier for the acquisition of commercial products or commercial services.
( b ) Nothing in this subpart shall be construed to authorize the waiver of any provision of law with respect to any subcontract if the prime contractor is reselling or distributing commercial products or commercial services of another contractor without adding value. This limitation is intended to preclude establishment of unusual contractual arrangements solely for the purpose of Government sales.
( c ) For purposes of this subpart, contractors awarded subcontracts under subpart 19.8, Contracting with the Small Business Administration (the 8(a) Program), shall be considered prime contractors.
[60 FR 48241, Sept. 18, 1995, as amended at 86 FR 61024, Nov. 4, 2021]
Appeal No. 74-12.

#### Umberto Nascimento *v.*Phillips Petroleum Co. *et al.*

*Lovett*<fe *Linder, Ltd., Stephen G. Linder,*for plaintiff. *Francis V. Reynolds,*for Phillips Petroleum Co. *A. David Tammelleo,*for C. W. Tripp. *Raymond A. LaFazia,*for Warren Oil Company and Rhode Island Oil Company, Inc.

Motions of defendants Phillips Petroleum Co., Warren Oil Company, Rhode Island Oil Company, Inc., and C. W. Tripp to affirm the order of the Superior Court under Rule 16, as amended, are denied.

Joslin, J. not participating.
#### Kozy Books, Inc., et al., Appellants, v. Irwin Stillman et al., Respondents, et al., Defendant.

Order, entered on March 19, 1963, unanimously *803modified, on the law, to the extent of reinstating the cause of action on behalf of plaintiff Kozy Books, Inc., and is otherwise affirmed, without costs. Plaintiff pleads in such cause of action that for a valuable consideration defendants agreed to render legal services ■ to the corporate plaintiff, a book publisher. One of such legal services was to advise plaintiff whether certain passages of books intended to be published should be modified or deleted, to avoid prosecution for violation of the law. Plaintiff alleges further that all manuscripts, including books to be revised, to be published by the corporate plaintiff were brought in or mailed to the office of defendants, and at least one of the defendants was to read and advise plaintiff respecting the contents thereof. It is further alleged that one book was read by one of the defendants and advice given to the plaintiff as to modifications to be made, and that such modifications were thereafter made. Plaintiff asserts that defendants failed and refused to read any of the other manuscripts and advise plaintiff upon them. As a result, the plaintiff sustained certain damages. It is alleged that the plaintiff relied upon the use of legal skills of said defendants to censor prepublication materials, and that there was a breach of duty on the part of the defendants in failing to perform the service, all to the plaintiff’s damage. Giving as we must a liberal construction to the pleadings, without in any way reaching the merits, we find that a cause of action is stated. Order, entered on March 22, 1963, unanimously affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Order and judgment unanimously affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Concur — Botein, P. J., Rabin, McNally, Stevens and Steuer, JJ.
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Nicholas A. Kamisaroff, Appellant, v. W. Cecil Johnston, as Director of Dannemora State Hospital, Respondent.

Motion for an order directing the Clinton County Clerk to furnish photostatic copies of papers denied, without costs.
### §2326. Regulations

The Secretary may establish regulations, not inconsistent with law, for the conduct of proceedings in the Plant Variety Protection Office after consultations with the Plant Variety Protection Board.

(Pub. L. 91–577, title I, §6, Dec. 24, 1970, 84 Stat. 1542.)