alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### 1352.216-70 Estimated and allowable costs.

As prescribed in 48 CFR 1316.307(a), insert the following clause:

# Estimated and Allowable Costs (Date)

(a) Estimated Costs. The estimated cost of this contract is $________ [insert total cost of contract], which consists of $________ [insert amount of cost that is reimbursable] for reimbursable costs and $________ [insert amount of fixed fee] for fixed/incentive fee. These costs shall be subject to the provisions of FAR clause 52.232-20, “Limitation of Cost,” FAR clause 52.216-7, “Allowable Cost and Payments,” and FAR clause 52.216-8, “Fixed Fee.”

(b) Subject to Availability of Funds [Insert paragraph (b) when the contract is issued subject to the availability of funds].

“The amount of funding for this contract is $________ [insert amount being funded], which consists of $________ [insert amount of reimbursable costs funded] for reimbursable costs and $ ________ [insert amount of fixed fee funded] for Fixed/Incentive Fee. These costs shall be subject to the provisions of FAR 52.232-22, “Limitations of Funds.” ”

(c) Allowable Costs.

(1) Final annual indirect cost rate(s) and the appropriate base(s) shall be established in accordance with FAR Subpart 42.7, in effect for the period covered by the indirect cost rate proposal.

(2) Until final annual indirect cost rates are established for any period, the Government shall reimburse the contractor at billing rates established by the Contracting Officer (or cognizant Federal agency official) or auditor in accordance with FAR 42.704, subject to adjustment when the final rates are established. The established billing rates are currently as follows:

____________________ [Insert billing rate]

(End of clause)
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.1
 
               COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
 
                             (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                  FISCAL YEAR ENDED MARCH 31,
                                                 -----------------------------
                                                  1995   1996   1997    1998
                                                 ------ ------ ------ --------
<S>                                              <C>    <C>    <C>    <C>
Operating income (loss)......................... 40,721 61,385 66,020 (235,209)
Portion of rental expenses deemed to represent
 interest.......................................  3,167  3,500  5,433   13,967
                                                 ------ ------ ------ --------
Earnings (loss) before fixed charges............ 43,888 64,885 71,453 (221,242)
                                                 ====== ====== ====== ========
Interest expense................................  8,807 16,280 26,509   53,887
Portion of rental expenses deemed to represent
 interest.......................................  3,167  3,500  5,433   13,967
                                                 ------ ------ ------ --------
Fixed charges................................... 11,974 19,780 31,942   67,854
                                                 ====== ====== ====== ========
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges..............   3.7x   3.3x   2.2x       na
                                                 ====== ====== ====== ========
Deficiency of earnings to fixed charges.........     na     na     na $289,096
                                                 ====== ====== ====== ========
</TABLE>
#### 1511.011-79 Information resources management.

The Contracting Officer shall insert the clause at 1552.211-79, Compliance with EPA Policies for Information Resource Management, in all solicitations and contracts.
08/20/2015

US Department of Transportation

Docket Management System

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E.

West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140

Washington, DC 20590

Petition for Exemption to section 333 on behalf of the Petitioner; Submitted by

Attorney Jerald A. Lavin, Jerald A. Lavin, Ltd

324 Osprey Point Drive

Osprey, Florida 34229

941 320 0077

lavin77@comcast.net

Petitioner:

Matthew D. Lavin a/k/a Aerography

1350 45th Avenue #B

Capitola, CA. 95010

Tel. 917 509-3201

DOCKET NUMBER; FAA-2015-1901-0001

AMENDMENT OF ORIGINAL PETITION FILED MAY,12,2015

Discussions with Mr. Rob Pappas of the FAA, required that petitioner Matthew D. Lavin a/k/a 

Aerography, file an amendment to The previously filed petition relating to identification of the 

UAS craft seeking the stated 333 exemption as stated in the original petition.

AMENDMENT TO PETITION:

Docket Number; FAA-2015-1901-0001

“Approval of the exemption for petitioner will allow commercial operation of the Gryphon 

Dynamics 900.”

AMENDED TO READ:

“GRYPHON DYNAMICS GD-6-HX900F” wherever and whenever the “Gryphon Dynamics 900” 

is referred to in the initial petition it shall be referred to as “Gryphon Dynamics 900- GD6-

HX900F” by way of reference to this filed amendment to docket number, FAA-2015-1901-0001. 
2

AMEND TO INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING ADDITIONAL UAS:

Matthew D. Lavin a/k/a Aerography, Regulatory Docket Number, FAA-2015-1901-0001, 

for the purpose of conducting unmanned aircraft system (UAS) operations for the 

Photography and Videography, and Construction industries, respectfully requests an 

amendment to the Exemption request to allow the below listed additional type of unmanned 

aircraft system (UAS) that fully complies with the conditions of the Exemption request.

In addition, Matthew D. Lavin, a/k/a, Aerography, wishes to additionally operate a DJI 

S1000, DJI S900, DJI Inspire, under the same terms and conditions contained in the 

Exemption request. The Flight Operations and Procedures Manual (FOPM) for the additional 

UAS are sent under separate cover. All operations of the additional UAS will be in full 

compliance with the terms of the Exemption request. As this is an amendment to an existing 

Exemption, Matthew D. Lavin, a/k/a Aerography, respectfully submits that good cause exists 

so that notice does not need to be published in the Federal Register for the requested 

amendment. Please feel free to contact the undersigned should you have any question or 

concerns concerning this request for an amendment to the Exemption request.

Thank you for your consideration,

Attorney Jerald A. Lavin, Jerald A. Lavin, Ltd

324 Osprey Point Drive

Osprey, Florida 34229

941 320 0077

lavin77@comcast.net

Attachments

DJI Inspire 1 User Manual

DJI S900 User Manual

DJI S1000 User manual
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                       2,030,544
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   31,327
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                      64,347,015
<DEPRECIATION>                            (37,095,184)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              32,508,764
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                     39,684,440
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                32,508,764
<SALES>                                     14,304,055
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            14,451,831
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            10,239,167
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,905,403
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            307,243
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   307,243
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### 1519.705-2 Determining the need for a subcontract plan.

One copy of the determination required by FAR 19.705-2(c) shall be placed in the contract file and one copy provided to the Director of the Office of Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization.
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Orazio Perrotta, Respondent, v. Luigi Sette et al., Appellants. Excel Contracting Corp. et al., Respondents. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.

Motion to dismiss appeal granted, without costs, unless appellants perfect appeal, file note of issue, and file and serve record and brief on or before December 10, 1960 and are ready for argument at the January 1961 Term of this court, in which event the motion is denied. Appellants should settle the record in accordance with the practice and may review by appeal the board’s decision of settlement. If additional material is added to the record it may be filed in printed or mimeographed form as an addendum to the record now on file.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF JUNE 30, 1999 AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT
OF OPERATIONS FOR SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                       2,786,300
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,102,800
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  2,761,300
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,822,000
<PP&E>                                       8,864,600
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,959,400
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,727,900
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,989,500
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  5,400,000
<COMMON>                                     8,293,400
<OTHER-SE>                                 (5,835,600)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,727,900
<SALES>                                      5,434,100
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,434,100
<CGS>                                        4,548,700
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,548,700
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               659,400
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              66,200
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                159,800
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            159,800
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   159,800
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT B

Case: 1:12-cv-01410 Document #: 226-2 Filed: 05/12/17 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:1811
Case: 1:12-cv-01410 Document #: 226-2 Filed: 05/12/17 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:1812
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |  |  |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |  |  |
| ******Home             Page****Mission****History**
**Habitats**
**Refuge Comprehensive Conservation                Plan****Documents for Public Comment****Education****Things           To Do****Maps****Regulations****Fees****Staff****Volunteers****Photos****Links****What's           New** **Current           Weather** |  |
#### 1339.107 Contract clauses.

Insert clause 1352.239-70, *Software License Addendum,* in all contracts when the primary purpose is to purchase new software licenses or renew existing licenses.
114 STAT. 1920 PUBLIC LAW 106–437—NOV. 6, 2000

Public Law 106–437

106th Congress

An Act

To permit the payment of medical expenses incurred by the United States Park

Police in the performance of duty to be made directly by the National Park

Service, to allow for waiver and indemnification in mutual law enforcement agreements between the National Park Service and a State or political subdivision

when required by State law, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MEDICAL PAYMENTS.

(a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (e) of the Policemen and Firemen’s

Retirement and Disability Act (39 Stat. 718, as amended by 71

Stat. 394) is amended by adding at the end the following new

sentence: ‘‘Notwithstanding the previous sentence, in the case of

any member of the United States Park Police, payment shall be

made by the National Park Service upon a certificate of the Chief,

United States Park Police, setting forth the necessity for such

services or treatment and the nature of the injury or disease which

rendered the same necessary.’’.

(b) NATIONAL PARK SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT.—Section 6 of

the Policemen and Firemen’s Retirement and Disability Act Amendments of 1957 (71 Stat. 399) is amended by inserting after the

first sentence the following new sentence: ‘‘Such sums are authorized to be appropriated to reimburse the National Park Service,

on a monthly basis, for medical benefit payments made from funds

appropriated to the National Park Service in the case of any member

of the United States Park Police.’’.

SEC. 2. INDEMNIFICATION.

(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 10(c) of the Act of August 18, 1970

(Public Law 91–383; 16 U.S.C. 1a–6(c)), is amended—

(1) by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end of paragraph (2);

(2) by redesignating paragraphs (3) and (4) as paragraphs

(4) and (5), respectively; and

(3) by inserting after paragraph (2) the following:

‘‘(3) mutually waive, in any agreement pursuant to paragraphs (1) and (2) of this subsection or pursuant to subsection

(b)(1) with any State or political subdivision thereof where

State law requires such waiver and indemnification, any and

all civil claims against all the other parties thereto and, subject

to available appropriations, indemnify and save harmless the

other parties to such agreement from all claims by third parties

for property damage or personal injury, which may arise out

of the parties’ activities outside their respective jurisdictions

under such agreement; and’’.

Nov. 6, 2000

[H.R. 4404]

PUBLIC LAW 106–437—NOV. 6, 2000 114 STAT. 1921

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 4404:

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 106–854, Pt. 1 (Comm. on Resources).

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 146 (2000):

Oct. 17, considered and passed House.

Oct. 26, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

(b) TECHNICAL AMENDMENT.—Paragraph (5) of section 10(c)

the Act of August 18, 1970 (Public Law 91–383; 16 U.S.C. 1a–

6(c)) (as redesignated by subsection (a)(2)), is further amended—

(1) by striking ‘‘(5) the’’ and inserting ‘‘The’’; and

(2) by moving the text flush and 2 ems to the left.

Approved November 6, 2000.
#### (A) Federal Insurance Company et al. v. United Port Service Company. (B) Federal Insurance Company et al. v. United Port Service Company. (C) Federal Insurance Company et al. v. Associated Operating Co. (D) Willamay Taylor et al. v. Fifth Avenue Coach Line, Inc., et al.

Motion to dismiss appeal granted, with $10 costs, unless the appellants procure the record on appeal and appellants’ points to be served and filed on or before December 5, 1960, with notice of argument for the January 1961 Term of this court, said appeal to be argued or submitted when reached. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, Valente, McNally and Bastow, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM (A) THE
     12-31-98  FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS  CONTAINED  IN FORM 10-KSB FOR DECEMBER 31,
     1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH (B) FORM 10-KSB.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>      0000318245                           
<NAME>     ASSOCIATED MEDIAL DEVICES, INC.                   
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          4248
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       44094
<OTHER-SE>                                     (48342)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   0
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1416
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1416)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1416)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1416)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        


</TABLE>
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed July 12, 2023.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D22-1848

Lower Tribunal No. F14-0192

________________

John J. Wilson, Jr.,

Appellant,

vs.

The State of Florida,

Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Milton 

Hirsch, Judge.

John J. Wilson, Jr., in proper person.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Magaly Rodriguez, Assistant 

Attorney General, for appellee.

Before FERNANDEZ, SCALES, and LINDSEY, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
1401.303 Publication and codification. ( a ) ( 1 ) Implementing and supplementing regulations issued under the DIAR System are codified under Chapter 14 in Title 48, Code of Federal Regulations and shall parallel the FAR in format, arrangement, and numbering system.
( 2 ) ( i ) Department-wide regulations are assigned parts 1401 through 1479 under 48 CFR, Chapter 14.
( ii ) Where material in the FAR requires no implementation, there will be no corresponding number in the DIAR. Thus, there are gaps in the DIAR sequence of numbers where the FAR, as written, is deemed adequate. Supplemental material shall be numbered as specified in FAR 1.303.
( 3 ) Bureau-wide regulations are authorized for codification in Appendices to Chapter 14, as assigned by the Director, PAM, in accordance with 1401.304(a)(3).
( b ) Regulations implementing the FAR or DIAR are numbered using Parts 1401 through 1479. Supplemental material is numbered using Parts 1480 through 1499. Numbers for implementing or supplementing regulations by bureaus/offices are preceded by a prefix to the number 14 (indicating Chapter 14-DIAR) for the organization indicated by lettered appendices as follows: ( 1 ) Bureau of Indian Affairs—BIA
( 2 ) Bureau of Reclamation—WBR
( 3 ) National Business Center—NBC
( 4 ) Bureau of Land Management—LLM
( 5 ) U.S. Geological Survey—WGS
( 6 ) Office of Surface Mining Reclamation & Enforcement—LSM
( 7 ) Minerals Management Service—LMS
( 8 ) National Park Service—FNP
( 9 ) U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service—FWS
( c ) *e.g.,* FAR 1.3 then DIAR 1401.3 [Department level] then in Appendix A, BIA 1401.3 [Bureau level].
#### Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Appellant, v Pearl Port et al., Defendants, and Herbert S. Port et al., Respondents.

In a condemnation proceeding, the appeal is from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County, entered December 12, 1977, which confirmed and approved the supplemental report of the Commissioners of Appraisal, filed April 25, 1977. Order affirmed, with costs. In this matter, issues of fact were presented to the commissioners and resolved by them. It cannot be said that their findings were not supported by substantial evidence. Mollen, P. J., Hopkins, Titone, Hawkins and O’Connor, JJ., concur.