alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §1204. Immediate relative and special immigrant visas

A consular officer may, subject to the limitations provided in section 1201 of this title, issue an immigrant visa to a special immigrant or immediate relative as such upon satisfactory proof, under regulations prescribed under this chapter, that the applicant is entitled to special immigrant or immediate relative status.

(June 27, 1952, ch. 477, title II, ch. 3, §224, 66 Stat. 195; Pub. L. 89–236, §11(d), Oct. 3, 1965, 79 Stat. 918.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original, "this Act", meaning act June 27, 1952, ch. 477, 66 Stat. 163, known as the Immigration and Nationality Act, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1101 of this title and Tables.

#### Amendments

1965—Pub. L. 89–236 struck out reference to sections 1154 and 1155 of this title and substituted "special immigrant or immediate relative" for "nonquota immigrant".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1965 Amendment

For effective date of amendment by Pub. L. 89–236, see section 20 of Pub. L. 89–236, set out as a note under section 1151 of this title.
### §§41 to 43. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Sections 41 to 43 transferred to sections 1981 to 1983, respectively, of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare.
MEMORANDUM

TO: Denise L. Carter

FROM: The Secretary

SUBJECT: Delegation of Authority 

I. DELEGATION

By the authority vested in me by section 412 of the Department of Education 

Organization Act, 20 U.S.C. § 3472, I hereby delegate to you the authority to perform the 

functions and duties vested by law and other delegations in the position of Assistant 

Secretary for the Office of Finance and Operations, which includes the duties and 

functions of the Department’s Chief Financial Officer. 

Unless otherwise noted in future delegations of authority, amendments to the authority 

delegated herein are included within the scope of this delegation. 

II. RESERVATIONS 

None. 

III. REDELEGATION

This authority may not be redelegated.

IV. CERTIFICATION AND EFFECTIVE DATE

This delegation is effective upon certification by the Department’s Principal Delegations 

Control Officer. It remains in effect until a nominee is confirmed and sworn-in to the 

position of Assistant Secretary for the Office of Finance and Operations, an acting officer 

fills the position, or another individual is delegated the authority to perform the functions 

and duties of the position, whichever occurs first. 

I hereby ratify actions within the scope of this delegation taken by you prior to the date of 

certification. 

 __________/s_______________ 

 Miguel A. Cardona, Ed.D. 

OGC Concurrence and Date: Mike Taylor; 3/3/23 

Certified date: 3/13/23

Delegations Officer: Jim Clemmens

Control Number: EA/EK/226______________________
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Synthetic Blood International, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert W. Nicora, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                   |  |                                      
|------------------ |  | -------------------------------------
|September 14, 2004 |  | /s/ Robert W. Nicora                 
|                   |  | President and Chief Executive Officer



CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Synthetic Blood International, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David H. Johnson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                   |  |                        
|------------------ |  | -----------------------
|September 14, 2004 |  | /s/ David H. Johnson   
|                   |  | Chief Financial Officer



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Synthetic Blood International, Inc. and will be retained by Synthetic Blood International, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

RAJKA SUBARIC, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) No. 11 C 9222

)

INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD )

TEAMSTERS LOCAL #781, )

)

Defendant. )

MEMORANDUM ORDER

This Court’s January 5, 2012 memorandum order (“Order”) was

issued sua sponte to require pro se plaintiff Rajka Subaric

(“Subaric”) to offer more than her Complaint ¶27’s skeletal

assertion of the failure of her union (defendant International

Brotherhood of Teamsters Local #781) to provide her with fair

representation in her grievance against her employer, United

Airlines. In addition to drawing Subaric’s attention to a

relevant decision by our Court of Appeals, the Order directed her

“to flesh out that generalized allegation on or before

January 23, 2012.”

That due date came and went more than a week ago without any

response from Subaric. Not only has she failed to meet what the

Order referred to as “the ‘plausibility’ requirement that the

Twombly-Iqbal canon now requires of any plaintiff,” but she has

failed to show that her denial-of-fair-representation claim had

been brought within the six-month time frame mandated by Del

Costello v. Teamsters, 462 U.S. 151 (1983). Accordingly both the

Case: 1:11-cv-09222 Document #: 9 Filed: 02/01/12 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:26
Complaint and this action are dismissed--both because of

Subaric’s failure to comply with the Order and due to

untimeliness.

________________________________________

Milton I. Shadur

Senior United States District Judge

Date: February 1, 2012

2

Case: 1:11-cv-09222 Document #: 9 Filed: 02/01/12 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:27
### §1370. Reimbursement of States and localities for emergency ambulance services

Subject to the availability of appropriations, the Attorney General shall fully reimburse States and political subdivisions of States for costs incurred by such a State or subdivision for emergency ambulance services provided to any alien who—

(1) is injured while crossing a land or sea border of the United States without inspection or at any time or place other than as designated by the Attorney General; and

(2) is under the custody of the State or subdivision pursuant to a transfer, request, or other action by a Federal authority.

(Pub. L. 104–208, div. C, title V, §563, Sept. 30, 1996, 110 Stat. 3009–683.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996, and also as part of the Omnibus Consolidated Appropriations Act, 1997, and not as part of the Immigration and Nationality Act which comprises this chapter.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Abolition of Immigration and Naturalization Service and Transfer of Functions

For abolition of Immigration and Naturalization Service, transfer of functions, and treatment of related references, see note set out under section 1551 of this title.
1239.000 Scope of part. In addition to FAR 39.000, this part prescribes acquisition policies and procedures for use in acquiring information technology and information technology-related supplies, services and systems, including information security, to include— ( a ) Software management and development;
( b ) Section 508 standards and compliance for contracts;
( c ) Information security and incident response reporting;
( d ) Protection of data about individuals;
( e ) Cloud computing;
( f ) Technology modernization and upgrade/refreshment; and
( g ) Record management.
FORM 10-Q

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

[x] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2008

OR

[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIESEXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ____________ to ___________

Commission file number 0-827

EMPIRE STATE BUILDING ASSOCIATES L.L.C.

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

A New York Limited Liability Company 13-6084254

(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer

incorporation or organization) Identification No.)

60 East 42nd Street, New York, New York

(Address of principal executive offices)

10165

(Zip Code)

(212) 687-8700

(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

N/A

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since lastreport)

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reportsrequired to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that theRegistrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to suchfiling requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [ X ]. No [ ].

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shellcompany (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act) Yes [ ] No [ X ] .

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a largeaccelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smallerreporting company.

Large Accelerated Filer [ ] Accelerated Filer [ ]Non-Accelerated Filer [ ] 

Smaller Reporting Company [X]

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements.

Empire State Building Associates L.L.C.

(A Limited Liability Company)

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

(Unaudited)
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6248

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

CRAIG BURRIS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Florence. C. Weston Houck, Chief District

Judge. (CR-94-430, CA-96-1547-4-12)

Submitted: May 14, 1998 Decided: June 18, 1998

Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Craig Burris, Appellant Pro Se. Alfred William Walker Bethea,

Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997).

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. United States v. Burris, Nos. CR-94-430; CA-96-1547-4-12

(D.S.C. Dec. 17, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           12906
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   141388
<ALLOWANCES>                                      2367
<INVENTORY>                                     210119
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                392319
<PP&E>                                          769475
<DEPRECIATION>                                  355890
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1053150
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           179576
<BONDS>                                         275596
<COMMON>                                        118444
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      329968
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1053150
<SALES>                                         789123
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                789123
<CGS>                                           564013
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   679767
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (947)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               15489
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  94814
<INCOME-TAX>                                     33441
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              61373
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     61373
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .52
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .52
        

</TABLE>
#### 1306.501 Requirement.

The designee authorized to designate a Competition Advocate for the Department and each procuring activity is set forth in CAM 1301.70.
### §208. Application

Chapter 1 applies to actions and proceedings brought under this chapter to the extent that chapter is not in conflict with this chapter or the Convention as ratified by the United States. This chapter applies to the extent that this chapter is not in conflict with chapter 4.

(Added Pub. L. 91–368, §1, July 31, 1970, 84 Stat. 693; amended Pub. L. 117–90, §2(b)(1)(B), Mar. 3, 2022, 136 Stat. 27.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2022—Pub. L. 117–90 substituted "Application" for "Chapter 1; residual application" in section catchline and inserted at end "This chapter applies to the extent that this chapter is not in conflict with chapter 4."

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2022 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 117–90 applicable with respect to any dispute or claim that arises or accrues on or after Mar. 3, 2022, see section 3 of Pub. L. 117–90, set out as an Effective Date note under section 401 of this title.

#### Effective Date

Section effective upon the entry into force of the Convention on Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards with respect to the United States (Dec. 29, 1970), see section 4 of Pub. L. 91–368, set out as a note under section 201 of this title.
#### In the Matter of Carl A.G., Appellant, v Myriam L.G., Respondent.

[833 NYS2d 421]

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Genesee County (Eric R. Adams, J.), entered February 28, 2006 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order dismissed the amended petition.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs. Present—Gorski, J.E, Lunn, Fahey, Green and Pine, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 9 (Thursday, January 14, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 3228]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-00601]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 11302]


Review and Amendment of the Designation of Lashkar i Jhangvi (and 
Other Aliases) as a Foreign Terrorist Organization

    Based upon a review of the Administrative Record assembled pursuant 
to Section 219(a)(4)(C) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, as 
amended (8 U.S.C. 1189(a)(4)(C)) (``INA''), and in consultation with 
the Attorney General and the Secretary of the Treasury, I conclude that 
the circumstances that were the basis for the designation of the 
aforementioned organization (and other aliases) as a Foreign Terrorist 
Organization have not changed in such a manner as to warrant revocation 
of the designation and that the national security of the United States 
does not warrant a revocation of the designation. I also conclude that 
there is a sufficient factual basis to find that the following are 
additional aliases of the aforementioned organization (and other 
aliases): Lashkar e Jhangvi al-Alami, also known as Lashkar e Jhangvi 
al-Almi, also known as LeJ al-Alami.
    Therefore, I hereby determine that the designation of the 
aforementioned organization (and other aliases) as a Foreign Terrorist 
Organization, pursuant to Section 219 of the INA, as amended (8 U.S.C. 
1189), shall be maintained. Additionally, pursuant to Section 219(b) of 
the INA, as amended (8 U.S.C. 1189(b)), I hereby amend the designation 
of the aforementioned organization (and other aliases) as a Foreign 
Terrorist Organization to include the following new aliases: Lashkar e 
Jhangvi al-Alami, also known as Lashkar e Jhangvi al-Almi, also known 
as LeJ al-Alami.
    This determination shall be published in the Federal Register.

    Dated: December 22, 2020.
Michael R. Pompeo,
Secretary of State.
[FR Doc. 2021-00601 Filed 1-13-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-AD-P
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

CAROLYN RUSIN, individually, and on 

behalf of All Others Similarly Situated,

Plaintiff,

v.

CHICAGO TRIBUNE COMPANY, 

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 1:12-cv-01135

Hon. Edmond E. Chang

UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A MEMORANDUM IN EXCESS OF 15 

PAGES IN SUPPORT OF THE PARTIES’ AGREED MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY 

APPROVAL OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AND FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION

Plaintiff, by and through her attorneys, hereby requests leave to file a Memorandum in 

Support of The Parties’ Motion For Preliminary Approval of Proposed Settlement and For Class 

Certification. In support of this motion, Plaintiff states as follows:

1. As reported at the last status hearing, the Parties reached a settlement in this 

matter with the assistance of a mediator.

2. The Court ordered that the Parties submit their motion for preliminary approval 

on or before January 31, 2013. ECF No. 21. 

3. In order to fully discuss the benefits that the parties’ settlement confers on the 

settlement classes, as well as the factors favoring preliminary approval of the settlement and the 

reasons supporting class certification, Plaintiff seeks leave from the Court to file a Memorandum 

of Law in excess of 15 pages and not to exceed 23 pages. 

4. Defendant does not oppose this motion. 

Case: 1:12-cv-01135 Document #: 22 Filed: 01/28/13 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:54
2

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully requests the Court grant this motion for leave to file

a Memorandum in Support of The Parties’ Motion for Preliminary Approval of Proposed 

Settlement and For Class Certification in excess of 15 Pages and for a total not to exceed 23

pages.

Respectfully submitted,

Dated: January 28, 2013

s/Maureen A. Salas

One of Plaintiffs’ Attorneys

Douglas M. Werman- dwerman@flsalaw.com

Maureen A. Salas –msalas@flsalaw.com

David E. Stevens- dstevens@flsalaw.com

Sarah J. Arendt- sarendt@flsalaw.com

Werman Law Office, P.C. 

77 W. Washington, Suite 1402

Chicago, IL 60602

(312) 419-1008

Case: 1:12-cv-01135 Document #: 22 Filed: 01/28/13 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:55
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 9 (Thursday, January 14, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 3150]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-00685]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. AD21-8-000]


Technical Conference on Reassessment of the Electric Quarterly 
Report Requirements; Notice of Technical Conference

    Take notice that on February 24, 2021, the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission (Commission) will convene a staff-led technical 
conference via webcast as part of a reassessment of the Electric 
Quarterly Report (EQR) requirements. A supplemental notice will be 
issued prior to the conference with further details regarding the 
agenda, meeting registration information, and electronic log-in 
information.
    The purpose of this technical conference is to provide a forum for 
Commission staff, filers, and data users to discuss potential changes 
to the current EQR data fields. This technical conference is intended 
to be the first in a series of conferences related to a reassessment of 
the EQR requirements.
    Commission conferences are accessible under section 508 of the 
Rehabilitation Act of 1973. For accessibility accommodations, please 
send an email to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#ef8e8c8c8a9c9c868d8683869b96af898a9d8cc1888099"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="48292b2b2d3b3b212a2124213c31082e2d3a2b662f273e">[email protected]</span></a> or call toll free 1-866-208-
3372 (voice) or 202-502-8659 (TTY), or send a FAX to 202-208-2106 with 
the required accommodations.
    For more information about the EQR technical conference, please 
contact Jeff Sanders of the Commission's Office of Enforcement at (202) 
502-6455, or send an email to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#89ccd8dbc9efecfbeaa7eee6ff"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="2b6e7a796b4d4e5948054c445d">[email protected]</span></a>. Additional information will 
also be provided on the EQR web page.

    Dated: January 8, 2021.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-00685 Filed 1-13-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>