alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
OAR Box 1384 

Prepped by Charmelle Mathews 

p.1 

Document Number: 

157) ll-E-117 

Docket Number: 

A-94-52 

Printed 7/2/2008 8:42:08 AM Sheet 157 of 264 
P.2 

Bl/ZZ/SB 09S39 

01/20/98 10:43 ©19198410234 

6 62 7 314 7 

PES RTP NC 

HR5BR0UC K INC . 

A 94 '$? 

II-F-///; 

B l 

8)002/002 

From: 

Date: 

Contact Report 

Robert Jemison, Pacific Environmental Services, Inc. (PES) 

December 30,1997 

Contact: Mr. Paul Olashauser 

Company: Hasbrouck Plastics, Inc. 

Telephone Number: (716)627-2371 

Fax Number: (716)627-3147 

Contact Summary: 

Mr. Paul Olashauser was contacted to update information provided in the 1993 EPA 

Reinforced Plastic/Composites Screening Survey submitted by Hasbrouck Plastics, Inc. for their 

facility located in Lake View, New York. In response to my questions Mr. Olashauser indicated the 

following: 

The facility still uses hand lay-up (bucket and brush) to apply vinyl ester, polyester, and 

isophthalic resins in the fabrication of certain products. Each of these resins contain approximately 

42% styrene by weight after additional styrene is added to the resins whi.ih initially contain 

approximately 40% styrene by weight. None ofthe resins are vapor suppressed. 

The facility has discontinued the use of pressure-fed rollers in the falsrication of certain 

products since these devices were not cost effective for this facility. 

The facility still uses atomized mechanical spray-up to apply vinyl ftrter, polyester, and 

isophthalic resins in the fabrication of certain products. Each of these resins contain approximately 

42% styrene by weight after additional styrene is added to the resins which initially contain 

approximately 40% styrene by weight. None of the resins are vapor suppressed. 

INFORMATION IS ACCURATE
Exhibit 32.1
 SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION*
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
 Date: March 3, 2010
    /s/ Steven A. DavisSteven A. DavisChairman and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) 
 *
    
    This certification is being furnished as required by Rule 13a-14(b) under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the
United States Code, and shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the
Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liability of that Section. This certification
shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities
Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act, except as otherwise stated in such filing.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-6261

CARL L. HUFF, JR.,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

RONALD ANGELONE,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Richmond. David G. Lowe, Magistrate Judge.

(CA-02-297)

Submitted: April 24, 2003 Decided: May 2, 2003

Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Carl L. Huff, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Linwood Theodore Wells, Jr.,

Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
*

 The parties consented to trial before a magistrate judge

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2000).

2

PER CURIAM:

Carl L. Huff, Jr., seeks to appeal from the magistrate judge’s

order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254

(2000).* An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a

habeas corpus proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues

a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000).

When, as here, the lower court dismisses a § 2254 petition solely

on procedural grounds, a certificate of appealability will not

issue unless the petitioner can demonstrate both “(1) ‘that jurists

of reason would find it debatable whether the petition states a

valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right’ and (2) ‘that

jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the district

court was correct in its procedural ruling.’” Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d

676, 684 (4th Cir.) (quoting Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484

(2000)), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 941 (2001). We have independently

reviewed the record and conclude that Huff has not satisfied this

standard. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 123 S. Ct. 1029, 1040 (2003).

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the

appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### 1318.202 Defense or recovery from certain attacks.

The designee authorized to serve as the Head of the Agency under FAR 18.202(a), (b) and (c) is set forth in CAM 1301.70.
FY 2020 AGENCY FINANCIAL REPORT | U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION 39

Department’s financial statements and activities that 

contributed to the audit opinion. 

OFO provides stewardship and accountability of agency 

funds by leveraging new technologies to modernize 

outdated business processes, developing financial 

management policies and procedures, establishing and 

overseeing internal controls, and producing high-quality 

financial and managerial reports. Despite the challenges 

associated with the COVID-19 pandemic, the agency was 

able to maintain effective financial management operations 

even in a remote work environment.

We also received external validation of our sustained 

efforts to produce user-friendly, transparent financial 

reporting by earning the Department’s 16th award of the 

Association of Government Accountants’ Certificate of 

Excellence in Accountability Reporting. Federal financial 

reports must pass a rigorous independent review against 

a comprehensive set of standards to earn this prestigious 

recognition, which is the highest award bestowed for 

federal financial reporting.

The Department’s achievements illustrate the remarkable 

effort and dedication of our employees and partners. We 

will continue to serve as accountable and committed 

stewards supporting the Department’s mission on 

behalf of the public while enhancing our financial 

management capabilities.

Denise Carter

Delegated the authority to perform the functions and duties of 

the position of Chief Financial Officer

November 16, 2020

MESSAGE FROM THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

MESSAGE FROM THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER | FINANCIAL SECTION

I am honored to join Secretary DeVos in issuing our Fiscal 

Year (FY) 2020 Agency Financial Report (AFR) for the 

Department of Education. The Department is committed 

to promoting student achievement and preparation for 

global competitiveness by fostering educational excellence 

and ensuring equal access. The Department’s Office of 

Finance and Operations (OFO) strives to cultivate a 

financial management environment that drives innovation, 

ensures accountability, and effectively manages risk related 

to the resources entrusted to the Department.

For the 19th consecutive year, we received an unmodified 

(clean) audit opinion on our financial statements from 

our independent auditor. A clean opinion confirms 

that our financial statements are presented fairly, in all 

material respects, and conform with generally accepted 

accounting principles. The internal control report 

identified one material weakness, “Controls over the 

Reliability of Underlying Data Used in Credit Reform 

Re-estimates Need Improvement.” The Department 

remains committed to evaluating its internal controls 

for improvement opportunities. The “Financial Section” 

of this report provides detailed information about the
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 5 / Friday, January 8, 2021 / Notices 1585 

Dated: January 5, 2021. 

Andrea M. Gacki, 

Director, Office of Foreign Assets Control, 

U.S. Department of the Treasury. 

[FR Doc. 2021–00173 Filed 1–7–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4810–AL–C 

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY 

Emergency Rental Assistance 

AGENCY: Department of the Treasury. 

ACTION: Notification. 

SUMMARY: This notification announces 

that information about the Emergency 

Rental Assistance Program for States, 

U.S. Territories, certain local 

governments, and tribal communities is 

available on the U.S. Department of the 

Treasury (Treasury) website, https://

www.treasury.gov/policy-issues/cares/ 

emergency-rental-assistance-program. 

The website includes the grantee 

payment information form, instructions 

for submitting payment information, a 

list of eligible local governments, and a 

copy of the award terms to which 

grantees must agree in order to receive 

payments from Treasury. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Hannah Resig, Senior Policy Analyst, 

Domestic Finance, 202–622–1407, or 

Stephen T. Milligan, Deputy Assistant 

General Counsel (Banking & Finance), 

202–622–4051. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On 

December 27, 2020, the President signed 

into law the Consolidated 

Appropriations Act, 2021 (the ‘‘Act’’), 

Public Law 116–260. Division N, 

Section 501(a) of the Act provides $25 

billion for Treasury to make payments 

directly to States (including the District 

of Columbia), U.S. Territories (Puerto 

Rico, the United States Virgin Islands, 

Guam, the Commonwealth of the 

Northern Mariana Islands, and 

American Samoa), local governments 

with more than 200,000 residents, the 

Department of Hawaiian Home Lands, 

and Indian tribes (defined to include 

Alaska native corporations) or the 

tribally designated housing entity of an 

Indian tribe, as applicable. Division N, 

Section 501(c) of the Act requires that 

grantees use at least 90 percent of the 

funds to provide financial assistance 

such as the payment of rent, rental 

arrears, utilities and home energy costs, 

and utility and home energy cost arrears 

on behalf of eligible households and 

permits grantees to use no more than ten 

percent of the funds to provide housing 

stability services to eligible households 

and cover administrative costs. More 

information is available at https://

www.treasury.gov/policy-issues/cares/ 

emergency-rental-assistance-program. 

Dated: January 4, 2021. 

Daniel Kowalski, 

Counselor to the Secretary, U.S. Department 

of the Treasury. 

[FR Doc. 2021–00164 Filed 1–7–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE P 


tkelley on DSKBCP9HB2PROD with NOTICESEN08JA21.018</GPH>
### §625. Repealed. Pub. L. 108–357, title VI, §611(s), Oct. 22, 2004, 118 Stat. 1523

Section, Pub. L. 98–59, §3, July 25, 1983, 97 Stat. 296, related to review of the effects of Burley tobacco imports on the Department of Agriculture's Burley tobacco price-support program.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal applicable to the 2005 and subsequent crops of tobacco, see section 643 of Pub. L. 108–357, set out as an Effective Date note under section 518 of this title.

#### Savings Provision

Repeal not to affect the liability of any person under this section with respect to the 2004 or an earlier crop of tobacco, see section 614 of Pub. L. 108–357, set out as a note under section 515 of this title.
### §1637. Purpose

The purpose of this subchapter is to establish a program of information regarding the marketing of dairy products that—

(1) provides information that can be readily understood by producers and other market participants, including information with respect to prices, quantities sold, and inventories of dairy products;

(2) improves the price and supply reporting services of the Department of Agriculture; and

(3) encourages competition in the marketplace for dairy products.

(Aug. 14, 1946, ch. 966, title II, §271, as added Pub. L. 106–532, §2, Nov. 22, 2000, 114 Stat. 2541.)
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDG MENT

No. 04

- 15

- 00443

- CR

Kristen E. MEWS

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 186th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014CR2856

Honorable Jefferson Moore, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE BARNARD

, JUSTICE MARTINEZ , AND JUSTICE ALVAREZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the motion to dismiss is GRANTED

and this appeal is DISMISSED.

SIGNED August 12, 2015.

_________________________________ Marialyn Barnard, Justice
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 10.7


PROPOSAL

The Trident Group is pleased to submit the following proposal to Polydex:

BACKGROUND

Polydex has developed an iron/dextran product which they believe can
significantly reduce the toxicity of iron found in current marketed products.
Since there are some 50-60 deaths from iron poisoning each year Polydex believes
that the iron/dextran product has at least one significant advantage.

Since Polydex has limited experience in the OTC market they have requested that
Trident act as their new product development team to prepare the product for
launch, and possibly to support the subsequent marketing.

PROPOSAL

Trident will provide and outsource as necessary all resources to develop an
iron/dextran product for market. Trident will evaluate the market, develop
concepts and names, source packaging and advertising agencies, and in general
act as the marketing group for Polydex to insure a timely launch.

In addition, we will develop launch plans and source distribution partners for
the product. At Polydex's discretion Trident will continue to act as the
marketing team during the marketing phase of the product.

COST

$20,000.00 per month plus 10% royalty on net sales. In addition, Polydex will
pay for all agreed upon out of pocket expenses.

TIMING

Minimum of 12 months with an option to renew to manage the marketing phase. The
project will begin on March 1, 1997.

TERMS

First payment due on March 1, 1997 with subsequent payments due the first day of
each of the following months.

/s/ Raymond C. Freisheim                       /s/ Alec D. Keith, Ph.D
Director                                       Chairman
Trident Group                                  Polydex Pharmaceuticals, Ltd.
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
60 CAF 11-01770 PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., PERADOTTO, CARNI, WHALEN, AND MARTOCHE, JJ.

IN THE MATTER OF ANNASTASIA C.

--------------------------------------- CATTARAUGUS COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL ORDER SERVICES, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT; CAROL C., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. (APPEAL NO. 1.)

D.J. & J.A. CIRANDO, ESQS., SYRACUSE (ELIZABETH deV. MOELLER OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. STEPHEN J. RILEY, OLEAN, FOR PETITIONER-RESPONDENT. SCHAVON R. MORGAN, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD, MACHIAS, FOR ANNASTASIA C.
Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Cattaraugus County (Larry M. Himelein, J.), entered July 7, 2011 in a proceeding pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b. The order, among other things, adjudged that respondent had permanently neglected the subject child and transferred guardianship and custody of the child to petitioner. It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Entered: February 1, 2013 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 10 (Friday, January 15, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 4067]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-00843]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[ER-FRL-9054-8]


Environmental Impact Statements; Notice of Availability

    Responsible Agency: Office of Federal Activities, General 
Information 202-564-5632 or https://www.epa.gov/nepa.

Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact Statements (EIS)
Filed January 4, 2021 10 a.m. EST Through January 11, 2021 10 a.m. EST
Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.

Notice

    Section 309(a) of the Clean Air Act requires that EPA make public 
its comments on EISs issued by other Federal agencies. EPA's comment 
letters on EISs are available at: https://cdxnodengn.epa.gov/cdx-enepa-public/action/eis/search.

EIS No. 20210001, Draft, USMC, USAF, AZ, LEGISLATIVE--Reauthorization 
of the Barry M. Goldwater Range Land Withdrawal and Proposed Gila Bend 
Addition Land Withdrawal, Comment Period Ends: 03/01/2021, Contact: Jon 
Haliscak 210-395-0615.
EIS No. 20210002, Draft, BOEM, AK, Cook Inlet Planning Area Oil and Gas 
Lease Sale 258, Comment Period Ends: 03/01/2021, Contact: Amee Howard 
907-334-5200.
EIS No. 20210003, Draft, BLM, CA, Desert Plan Amendment Draft Land Use 
Plan Amendment and Draft Environmental Impact Statement, Comment Period 
Ends: 04/15/2021, Contact: Jeremiah Karuzas 916-978-4644.
EIS No. 20210004, Draft, BLM, NV, Relief Canyon Mine Expansion Project, 
Comment Period Ends: 03/01/2021, Contact: Jeanette Black 775-623-1500.
EIS No. 20210005, Final, USFS, AZ, Resolution Copper Project and Land 
Exchange, Review Period Ends: 03/01/2021, Contact: Mary Rasmussen 602-
225-5200.

Amended Notice

EIS No. 20200236, Final Supplement, USACE, AL, Allatoona Lake Water 
Supply Storage Reallocation Study and Updates to Weiss and Logan Martin 
Reservoirs Project Water Control Manuals, Alabama and Georgia (or 
Allatoona-Coosa Reallocation Study), Review Period Ends: 01/25/2021, 
Contact: Mr. Mike Malsom 251-690-2023. Revision to FR Notice Published 
12/11/2020; Extending the Review Period from 01/11/2021 to 01/25/2021.


    Dated: January 11, 2021.
Cindy S. Barger,
Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal Activities.
[FR Doc. 2021-00843 Filed 1-14-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
### §464e. Short-term medical services for students

In fiscal year 2004 and thereafter, the Center is authorized to provide short-term medical services for students undergoing training at the Center.

(Pub. L. 108–90, title IV, Oct. 1, 2003, 117 Stat. 1151.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Center, referred to in text, means the Federal Law Enforcement Training Center.

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act, 2004, and not as part of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 which comprises this chapter.

#### Prior Provisions

Similar provisions were contained in the following prior appropriation acts:

Pub. L. 108–7, div. J, title I, Feb. 20, 2003, 117 Stat. 431.

Pub. L. 107–67, title I, Nov. 12, 2001, 115 Stat. 517.

Pub. L. 106–554, §1(a)(3) [title I], Dec. 21, 2000, 114 Stat. 2763, 2763A–127.

Pub. L. 106–58, title I, Sept. 29, 1999, 113 Stat. 433.

Pub. L. 105–277, div. A, §101(h) [title I], Oct. 21, 1998, 112 Stat. 2681–480, 2681–483.

Pub. L. 105–61, title I, Oct. 10, 1997, 111 Stat. 1276.

Pub. L. 104–208, div. A, title I, §101(f) [title I], Sept. 30, 1996, 110 Stat. 3009–314, 3009–318.

Pub. L. 104–52, title I, Nov. 19, 1995, 109 Stat. 470.

Pub. L. 103–329, title I, Sept. 30, 1994, 108 Stat. 2384.

Pub. L. 103–123, title I, Oct. 28, 1993, 107 Stat. 1228.

Pub. L. 102–393, title I, Oct. 6, 1992, 106 Stat. 1730.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7180

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

BERNARD MIDDLETON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief District

Judge. (CR-92-348-A, CA-96-1097-AM)

Submitted: June 18, 1998 Decided: August 7, 1998

Before MURNAGHAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bernard Middleton, Appellant Pro Se. James L. Trump, OFFICE OF THE

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court’s order declining to

grant relief under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) from the court’s order

denying relief on Appellant’s motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West

1994 & Supp. 1998) . We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

a certificate of appealability and dismiss on the reasoning of the

district court. United States v. Middleton, Nos. CR-92-348-A; CA96-1097-AM (E.D. Va. June 9, 1997). We deny Middleton’s motion for

release pending review of the appeal as moot and dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
§ 955.13 Application. ( a ) *Submission procedures.* Any person seeking an OSM blaster certificate shall: ( 1 ) Complete and submit to OSM an application on the form prescribed by paragraph (b) of this section;
( 2 ) Include as part of the application a nonrefundable fee as follows: ( i ) Issuance or reissuance$122
( ii ) Reexamination$61
( iii ) Renewal$61
( iv ) Replacement$28
( v ) Reciprocity$61;
( 3 ) For certificate issuance or reissuance, include as part of the application satisfactory evidence of having completed training as provided in § 955.12;
( 4 ) For certificate issuance or reissuance, specify in the application the date when the applicant desires to take a previously scheduled examination; and
( 5 ) Submit the application in advance of the date of examination, or of certificate expiration, as follows: ( i ) For certificate issuance, not less than 60 days before the date on which the applicant desires to take a previously scheduled examination;
( ii ) For certificate renewal, not less than 60 days before the expiration date of the applicant's current certificate;
( iii ) For certificate reissuance, not less than 60 days before the date on which the applicant desires to take a previously scheduled examination that will be held at least 60 days before the expiration date of the applicant's current certificate; or
( iv ) For a certificate through reciprocity, not less than 45 days before the expiration date of the applicant's current certificate.
( b ) *Application form.* OSM shall make available to any person seeking an OSM blaster certificate an application form and instructions for its completion. The form shall include a statement in accordance with law that the information provided is true and accurate to the best knowledge and belief of the applicant, and shall require the signature of the applicant.