alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

        This EmploymentAgreement is made effective as of March 1, 2000 between Farmland Industries,Inc., a Kansas cooperative corporation (the “Company”) and H. D.Cleberg, who is presently the President and Chief Executive Officer of theCompany, (“Executive”) and supersedes the Employment Agreement betweenthe parties dated May 1, 1999, which is hereby terminated in its entirety. 

        WHEREAS,Executive is the principal officer of the Company and an integral part of itsmanagement and the Company desires to retain the services of Executive. 

        NOW THEREFORE,it is hereby agreed by and between the parties as follows:
Page 4 of 13
Page 3 of 13
 

Page 5 of 13
Page 6 of 13
 

Page 7 of 13
 

 

 

 

Page 8 of 13
 

Page 9 of 13
 

 

 

 

Page 10 of 13
 

 

Page 11 of 13
Page 12 of 13
 

Page 13 of 13
### SUBCHAPTER III—NATIONALITY THROUGH NATURALIZATION
#### EDWARD LEE BARHAM v. KELLI MOORE BARHAM

No. 440A97

(Filed 6 February 1998)

Appeal of right by plaintiff pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 127 N.C. App. 20, 487 S.E.2d 774 (1997), which affirmed in part and reversed in part an order entered 11 July 1995 and amended 28 September 1995 by Lawton, J., in District Court, Wake County. Heard in the Supreme Court 18 December 1997.

*Jack P. Gulley for plaintiff-appellant.*

*Oliver & Oliver, P.L.L.C., by John M.. Oliver, for defendantappellee.*

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

Chief Justice Mitchell did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.
#### Sarah Gold et al., Appellants, v. Harvey Goldring et al., Respondents, et al., Defendant.

■ Motion to dismiss appeal denied on condition that appellants argue or submit the appeal at the November I960 Term, beginning October 31, 1960, for which term the appeal is ordered to be placed on the calendar. The record and appellants’ brief must be served and filed on or before October 19, 1960. Beldoek, Acting P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Brennan, JJ., concur.
1

EAST\47812554.2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

MARTIN, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) Case No. 1:12-cv-00215

)

DUN & BRADSTREET, INC. and ) Judge Der-Yeghiayan

CONVERGYS CUSTOMER MANAGEMENT )

GROUP INC., ) Magistrate Judge Denlow

)

Defendants. )

DEFENDANT CONVERGYS CUSTOMER MANAGEMENT GROUP INC.’S

LOCAL RULE 3.2 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

Defendant Convergys Customer Management Group Inc. submits this Disclosure 

Statement pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1 and Local R. 3.2:

All publicly held affiliates of the party: Convergys Corporation 

Date: January 27, 2012 Respectfully submitted,

CONVERGYS CUSTOMER 

MANAGEMENT GROUP INC.

By: /s/ Albert E. Hartmann

One of Its Attorneys

Albert E. Hartmann (ARDC # 06256064)

DLA PIPER LLP (US)

203 North LaSalle Street, Suite 1900

Chicago, Illinois 60601

T: 312-368-2142

F: 312-630-7317

Email: albert.hartmann@dlapiper.com

Case: 1:12-cv-00215 Document #: 11 Filed: 01/27/12 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:35
EAST\47812554.2

2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, Albert E. Hartmann, an attorney, depose and state that on January 27, 2012, I 

electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system, which 

will serve electronic notice to all counsel of record.

s/ Albert E. Hartmann

Albert E. Hartmann

Case: 1:12-cv-00215 Document #: 11 Filed: 01/27/12 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:36
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 7 (Tuesday, January 12, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 2457]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-00351]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration

[Docket No. DEA-756]


Bulk Manufacturer of Controlled Substances Application: Cedarburg 
Pharmaceuticals

AGENCY: Drug Enforcement Administration, Justice.

ACTION: Notice of application.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Cedarburg Pharmaceuticals has applied to be registered as a 
bulk manufacturer of basic class(es) of controlled substance(s). Refer 
to Supplemental Information listed below for further drug information.

DATES: Registered bulk manufacturers of the affected basic class(es), 
and applicants therefore, may file written comments on or objections to 
the issuance of the proposed registration on or before March 15, 2021. 
Such persons may also file a written request for a hearing on the 
application on or before March 15, 2021.

ADDRESSES: Written comments should be sent to: Drug Enforcement 
Administration, Attention: DEA Federal Register Representative/DPW, 
8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with 21 CFR 1301.33(a), this 
is notice that on October 16, 2020, Cedarburg Pharmaceuticals 870 
Badger Circle, Grafton, Wisconsin 53024, applied to be registered as a 
bulk manufacturer of the following basic class(es) of controlled 
substance(s):

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                           Drug
          Controlled substance             code          Schedule
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tetrahydrocannabinols..................     7370  I
3, 4-Methylenedioxymethamphetamine.....     7405  I
Dimethyltryptamine.....................     7435  I
Psilocybin.............................     7437  I
Methylphenidate........................     1724  II
Nabilone...............................     7379  II
4-Anilino-N-phenethyl-4-piperidine          8333  II
 (ANPP).
Fentanyl...............................     9801  II
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The company plans to manufacture bulk active pharmaceutical 
ingredients (API) for distribution to its customers. In reference to 
the drug code 7370 (Tetrahydrocannabinols), the company plans to bulk 
manufacture as synthetic. No other activity for this drug code is 
authorized for this registration.

William T. McDermott,
Assistant Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2021-00351 Filed 1-11-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

MARSHA A. TYLER, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) No. 11 C 9262

)

COMPREHENSIVE HEALTH MANAGEMENT )

INC., )

)

Defendant. )

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

Comprehensive Health Management Inc. (“Comprehensive”) has

moved to dismiss part (although not all) of the employment

discrimination Complaint that had been filed pro se by its exemployee Marsha Tyler (“Tyler”) : the box checked in Complaint 1

¶12(f) that asserted Comprehensive had “failed to stop

harassment” and the box checked in Complaint ¶12(g) that said

Comprehensive had “retaliated against the plaintiff because the

plaintiff did something to assert rights protected by the laws

identified in paragraphs 9 and 10 above.” To that end

Comprehensive points to Tyler’s Charge of Discrimination filed

with the EEOC that was limited to asserted disability-based

discrimination in violation of the Americans With Disabilities

Act. Comprehensive’s motion has been fully briefed and is ripe

 Tyler had employed the Complaint of Employment 1

Discrimination form made available by the Clerk’s Office for use

by unrepresented litigants. This Court then granted Tyler’s

motion for the appointment of counsel, drawing on this District

Court’s trial bar for that purpose.
for decision.2

There is no question that the claim of retaliation omitted

from an ex-employee’s administrative charge (so that the asserted

retaliation had to have taken place before the charge was filed)

is barred by a failure-to-exhaust contention (McKenzie v. Ill.

Dep’t of Transp., 92 F.3d 473, 482-83 (7th Cir. 1996)). And the

same is true as to an omitted charge of harassment (Vela v. Vill.

of Sauk Vill., 218 F.3d 661, 664-65 (7th Cir. 2000); Rush v.

McDonald’s Corp., 966 F.2d 1104, 1111-12 (7th Cir. 1992)). Hence

Comprehensive’s partial motion to dismiss is granted, so that

those two theories are not assertable as independent predicates

for relief in this action.

But the scope of this ruling must not be misunderstood. 

Because discriminatory intent is a necessary component of Tyler’s

discrimination claim, evidence of such things as deliberate

harassment and retaliation may well be admissible at trial. That

is of course a matter that remains for the future.

________________________________________

Milton I. Shadur

Senior United States District Judge

Date: July 23, 2012

 No space will be devoted here to the assertion by Tyler 2

of waiver (or more accurately forfeiture) of Comprehensive’s

failure-to-exhaust-administrative-remedies defense. That

argument is patently unfounded.

2
### §5937. Natural products research program

#### (a) In general

The Secretary shall establish within the Department a natural products research program.

#### (b) Duties

In carrying out the program established under subsection (a), the Secretary shall coordinate research relating to natural products, including—

(1) research to improve human health and agricultural productivity through the discovery, development, and commercialization of products and agrichemicals from bioactive natural products, including products from plant, marine, and microbial sources;

(2) research to characterize the botanical sources, production, chemistry, and biological properties of plant-derived natural products; and

(3) other research priorities identified by the Secretary.

#### (c) Peer and merit review

The Secretary shall—

(1) determine the relevance and merit of research under this section through a system of peer review established by the Secretary pursuant to section 7613 of this title; and

(2) approve funding for research on the basis of merit, quality, and relevance to advancing the purposes of this section.

#### (d) Buildings and facilities

Funds made available under this section shall not be used for the construction of a new building or facility or the acquisition, expansion, remodeling, or alteration of an existing building or facility (including site grading and improvement and architect fees).

#### (e) Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section $7,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2014 through 2023.

(Pub. L. 110–234, title VII, §7525, May 22, 2008, 122 Stat. 1273; Pub. L. 110–246, §4(a), title VII, §7525, June 18, 2008, 122 Stat. 1664, 2035; Pub. L. 113–79, title VII, §7515, Feb. 7, 2014, 128 Stat. 903; Pub. L. 115–334, title VII, §7413, Dec. 20, 2018, 132 Stat. 4819.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Pub. L. 110–234 and Pub. L. 110–246 enacted identical sections. Pub. L. 110–234 was repealed by section 4(a) of Pub. L. 110–246.

Section was enacted as part of the Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008, and not as part of subtitle H of title XVI of the Food, Agriculture, Conservation, and Trade Act of 1990 which comprises this subchapter.

#### Amendments

2018—Subsec. (e). Pub. L. 115–334 substituted "2023" for "2018".

2014—Subsec. (e). Pub. L. 113–79 amended subsec. (e) generally. Prior to amendment, text read as follows: "There are authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section such sums as are necessary for each of fiscal years 2008 through 2012."

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Enactment of this section and repeal of Pub. L. 110–234 by Pub. L. 110–246 effective May 22, 2008, the date of enactment of Pub. L. 110–234, see section 4 of Pub. L. 110–246, set out as a note under section 8701 of this title.

#### Definition of "Secretary"

"Secretary" as meaning the Secretary of Agriculture, see section 8701 of this title.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Paul M. Dougan, President and Chief Executive Officer of Equity Oil Company, certify
that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Equity Oil Company;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange
Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

> a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
>   and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
>   relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
>   by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is
>   being prepared;

> b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
>   procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
>   disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
>   based on such evaluation; and

> c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
>   financial reporting that occurred during the registrants first fiscal quarter ending
>   March 31, 2004 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
>   affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

> a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
>   internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
>   the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
>   information; and

> b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
>   have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
>   reporting.

|Date: | May 12, 2004 | By                                                         | /s/ Paul M. Dougan
|----- | ------------ | ---------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------
|      |              | Paul M. Dougan, President and 
    Chief Executive Officer
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-14-0001207 06-FEB-2015 11:03 AM
### §7. Witnesses before arbitrators; fees; compelling attendance

The arbitrators selected either as prescribed in this title or otherwise, or a majority of them, may summon in writing any person to attend before them or any of them as a witness and in a proper case to bring with him or them any book, record, document, or paper which may be deemed material as evidence in the case. The fees for such attendance shall be the same as the fees of witnesses before masters of the United States courts. Said summons shall issue in the name of the arbitrator or arbitrators, or a majority of them, and shall be signed by the arbitrators, or a majority of them, and shall be directed to the said person and shall be served in the same manner as subpoenas to appear and testify before the court; if any person or persons so summoned to testify shall refuse or neglect to obey said summons, upon petition the United States district court for the district in which such arbitrators, or a majority of them, are sitting may compel the attendance of such person or persons before said arbitrator or arbitrators, or punish said person or persons for contempt in the same manner provided by law for securing the attendance of witnesses or their punishment for neglect or refusal to attend in the courts of the United States.

(July 30, 1947, ch. 392, 61 Stat. 672; Oct. 31, 1951, ch. 655, §14, 65 Stat. 715.)

#### Derivation

Act Feb. 12, 1925, ch. 213, §7, 43 Stat. 884.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1951—Act Oct. 31, 1951, substituted "United States district court for" for "United States court in and for", and "by law for" for "on February 12, 1925, for".
EXHIBIT 32.1
      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                FEDERAL MORTGAGE CORPORATION OF PUERTO RICO, INC.
                          PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.ss.1350,


In  connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Federal  Mortgage  Corporation  of
Puerto Rico,  Inc. (the  "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30,
2005, as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof
(the  "Report"),  I,  Michael  Schumacher,  Chief  Executive  Officer  and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss.1350,  as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge:

          (1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.



 /s/ Michael Schumacher
-----------------------
Michael Schumacher
President, Chief Executive Officer, Treasurer,
 and Chief Financial Officer
August 15, 2005
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 6 (Monday, January 11, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2005-2006]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-00230]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD


Civil Monetary Penalty Inflation Adjustment

AGENCY: Railroad Retirement Board.

ACTION: Notice announcing updated penalty inflation adjustments for 
civil monetary penalties for 2021.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: As required by Section 701 of the Bipartisan Budget Act of 
2015, entitled the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act 
Improvements Act of 2015, the Railroad Retirement Board (Board) hereby 
publishes its 2021 annual adjustment of civil penalties for inflation.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marguerite P. Dadabo, Assistant 
General

[[Page 2006]]

Counsel, Railroad Retirement Board, 844 North Rush Street, Chicago, IL 
60611-1275, (312) 751-4945, TTD (312) 751-4701.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 701 of the Bipartisan Budget Act of 
2015, Public Law 114-74 (Nov. 2, 2015), entitled the Federal Civil 
Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act Improvements Act of 2015 (the 2015 
Act), amended the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act of 
1990 (28 U.S.C. 2461 note) (Inflation Adjustment Act) to require 
agencies to publish regulations adjusting the amount of civil monetary 
penalties provided by law within the jurisdiction of the agency not 
later than January 15th of every year.
    For the 2021 annual adjustment for inflation of the maximum civil 
penalty under the Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act of 1986, the Board 
applies the formula provided by the 2015 Act and the Board's 
regulations at Title 20, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 356. In 
accordance with the 2015 Act, the amount of the adjustment is based on 
the percent increase between the Consumer Price Index (CPI-U) for the 
month of October preceding the date of the adjustment and the CPI-U for 
the October one year prior to the October immediately preceding the 
date of the adjustment. If there is no increase, there is no adjustment 
of civil penalties. The percent increase between the CPI-U for October 
2020 and October 2019, as provided by Office of Management and Budget 
Memorandum M-21-10 (December 23, 2020) is 1.01182 percent. Therefore, 
the new maximum penalty under the Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act is 
$11,803 (the 2020 maximum penalty of $11,665 multiplied by 1.01182, 
rounded to the nearest dollar). The new minimum penalty under the False 
Claims Act is $11,803 (the 2020 minimum penalty of $11,665 multiplied 
by 1.01182, rounded to the nearest dollar), and the new maximum penalty 
is $23,607 (the 2020 maximum penalty of $23,331 multiplied by 1.01182, 
rounded to the nearest dollar). The adjustments in penalties will be 
effective January 11, 2021.

    Dated: January 6, 2021.

    By Authority of the Board.
Stephanie Hillyard,
Secretary to the Board.
[FR Doc. 2021-00230 Filed 1-8-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
EXHIBIT 23

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

   We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement 
   No. 2-86070 on Form S-8 dated August 23, 1983; Registration Statement 
   No. 33-30364 on Form S-8 dated August 7, 1989; Registration Statement No.
   33-58750 on Form S-8 dated February 24, 1993; Registration Statement No. 
   33-58752 on Form S-8 dated February 24, 1993; Registration Statement No. 
   33-52487 on Form S-8 dated March 2, 1994 and Post-Effective Amendment No.
   1 to Registration Statement No. 33-52487 on Form S-8 dated March 3, 1994; 
   Registration Statement No. 333-00887 on Form S-4 dated February 13, 1996 and
   Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement No. 333-00887 on 
   Form S-4 dated February 14, 1996; Registration Statement No. 333-12743 on 
   Form S-4 dated September 26, 1996  of our report dated October 25, 1996, with
   respect to the consolidated financial statements incorporated by reference in
   the Annual Report (Form 10-K) of Andrew Corporation for the year ended 
   September 30, 1996.  

   /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
   Chicago, Illinois
   December 19, 1996
Exhibit 12
      E'TOWN CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
            (In Thousands Except Ratios)


                                             Three Months Ended Six Months Ended
                                                   June 30,         June 30,
                                                 1999    1998     1999    1998
EARNINGS:

Net income                                     $ 5,757 $ 5,162 $ 12,057 $ 9,325
Federal income taxes                             3,164   2,842    6,620   5,149
Interest charges                                 4,802   4,318    9,284   8,534
                                               ---------------------------------
Earnings available to cover fixed charges       13,723  12,322   27,961  23,008
                                               ---------------------------------

FIXED CHARGES:
Interest on long-term debt                       4,239   4,048    8,373   8,033
Other interest                                     565     286      856     500
Amortization of debt discount - net                110     109      220     217
                                               ---------------------------------
Total fixed charges                            $ 4,914 $ 4,443  $ 9,449 $ 8,750
                                               ---------------------------------

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges                2.79    2.77     2.96    2.63
                                               =================================





Earnings to Fixed Charges represents the sum of Net Income,
Federal income taxes and Interest Charges (which is reduced by
Capitalized interest), divided by Fixed Charges.
Fixed Charges consist of interest on long and short-term debt (which is not
reduced by Capitalized Interest), and Amortization of debt discount.