alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
14.401 Receipt and safeguarding of bids. ( a ) All bids (including modifications) received before the time set for the opening of bids shall be kept secure. Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, the bids shall not be opened or viewed, and shall remain in a locked bid box, a safe, or in a secured, restricted-access electronic bid box. If an invitation for bids is cancelled, bids shall be returned to the bidders. Necessary precautions shall be taken to ensure the security of the bid box or safe. Before bid opening, information concerning the identity and number of bids received shall be made available only to Government employees. Such disclosure shall be only on a *need to know* basis. When bid samples are submitted, they shall be handled with sufficient care to prevent disclosure of characteristics before bid opening.
( b ) Envelopes marked as bids but not identifying the bidder or the solicitation may be opened solely for the purpose of identification, and then only by an official designated for this purpose. If a sealed bid is opened by mistake (e.g., because it is not marked as being a bid), the envelope shall be signed by the opener, whose position shall also be written thereon, and delivered to the designated official. This official shall immediately write on the envelope ( 1 ) an explanation of the opening,
( 2 ) the date and time opened, and
( 3 ) the invitation for bids number, and shall sign the envelope. The official shall then immediately reseal the envelope.
[48 FR 42171, Sept. 19, 1983, as amended at 60 FR 34738, July 3, 1995]
#### 1352.245-70 Government furnished property.

As prescribed in [48 CFR 1345.107-70](/on/2024-09-16/title-48/section-1345.107-70), insert the following clause:

# Government Furnished Property (APR 2010)

The Government will provide the following item(s) of Government property to the contractor . The contractor shall be accountable for, and have stewardship of, the property in the performance of this contract. This property shall be used and maintained by the contractor in accordance with provisions of the “Government Property” clause included in this contract.

| Item No. | Description | Quantity | Delivery date | Property/Tag No. (if applicable) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | | |

(End of clause)

[[75 FR 10570](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/75-FR-10570), Mar. 8, 2010; [75 FR 14496](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/75-FR-14496), Mar. 26, 2010]
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 10(a)

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We consent to the use in this Post-Effective Amendment No. 20 to the
Registration Statement on Form N-4 (Reg. No. 2-95002) of Sun Life (N.Y.)
Variable Account A of our report dated February 10, 2000 accompanying the
financial statements of Sun Life (N.Y.) Variable Account A and to the use of
our report dated February 10, 2000 accompanying the statutory financial
statements of Sun Life Insurance and Annuity Company of New York, which
includes explanatory paragraphs relating to the use of statutory accounting
practices which differ from generally accepted accounting principles,
appearing in the Statement of Additional Information, which is part of such
Registration Statement, and to the incorporation by reference of our report
dated February 10, 2000 appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Sun
Life Insurance and Annuity Company of New York for the year ended
December 31, 1999, which includes explanatory paragraphs relating to the use
of statutory accounting practices which differ from generally accepted
accounting principles.

We also consent to the references to us under the heading "Condensed
Financial Information - Accumulation Unit Values" in the Prospectus, which is
part of such Registration Statement, and under the heading and "Accountants"
in such Statement of Additional Information.

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
April   , 2000
No. 721.

#### Phillips Company *v.*Byron F. Everitt, Trustee, etc.

March 8, 1920.

*Mr. William L. Carpenter*for petitioner.

*Mr. Clarence A. Lightner*and *Mr. Stewart Hanley*for respondent.

Petition for a writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Case: 3:12-cv-50065 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/21/12 Page 1 of 12 PageID #:1
Case: 3:12-cv-50065 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/21/12 Page 2 of 12 PageID #:2
Case: 3:12-cv-50065 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/21/12 Page 3 of 12 PageID #:3
Case: 3:12-cv-50065 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/21/12 Page 4 of 12 PageID #:4
Case: 3:12-cv-50065 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/21/12 Page 5 of 12 PageID #:5
Case: 3:12-cv-50065 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/21/12 Page 6 of 12 PageID #:6
Case: 3:12-cv-50065 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/21/12 Page 7 of 12 PageID #:7
Case: 3:12-cv-50065 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/21/12 Page 8 of 12 PageID #:8
Case: 3:12-cv-50065 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/21/12 Page 9 of 12 PageID #:9
Case: 3:12-cv-50065 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/21/12 Page 10 of 12 PageID #:10
Case: 3:12-cv-50065 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/21/12 Page 11 of 12 PageID #:11
Case: 3:12-cv-50065 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/21/12 Page 12 of 12 PageID #:12
Exhibit 10.3

AMENDMENT NO. 2

to the Exclusive License Agreement
between

VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY FOUNDATION

and

OXYGEN BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.

Whereas, Virginia Commonwealth University Intellectual Property Foundation (LICENSOR) and Oxygen Biotherapeutics, Inc. (LICENSEE, formally Synthetic Blood International, Inc.) are parties to an
Exclusive License Agreement entered into on May 21st,
2008;

Whereas,Section 2.2 of the Agreement states that LICENSOR grants to LICENSEE, and LICENSEE accepts, an exclusive
first option to enter into good faith negotiations for a license in the FIELD OF USE to include any inventions with respect to oxygen therapeutics invented by Dr. Bruce Spiess together with other inventors (if no inventor objects in writing) in
this AGREEMENT upon payment of $25,000 fee., and;

Whereas,LICENSOR, in a letter dated December 4, 2008, notified LICENSEE
of such invention described in VCU invention disclosure 08-052, entitled Intravenous Perfluorocarbon Emulsions for the Treatment of Traumatic Brain and Spinal Cord (Central Nervous System) Injury. LICENSEE has elected to include this
invention in the Exclusive License Agreement by paying the $25,000 fee on January 15,2009, and;

NOW THEREFORE,for good and
valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:

1. In Appendix A, the
following invention is added to the list of Licensed Patents:

4. PCT application and US patent application filed
July 17,2009, Serial Nos. PCT/US2009/004165 and 12/460,409, respectively, entitled METHOD OF TREATING TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY based on VCU invention 08-052.



|                             |  |                |  |                                      |  |                                           |  |        
|---------------------------- |  | -------------- |  | ------------------------------------ |  | ----------------------------------------- |  | -------
|Agreed and Accepted:        
|                             |  |               
|Oxygen Biotherapeutics, Inc. |  |                |  | VCU Intellectual Property Foundation
|By                           |  |                |  |                                      |  | By                                        |  |        
|                             |  |               
|/s/ Michael Jebsen           |  |                |  | /s/ Ivelina S. Metcheva             
|Name                         |  | Michael Jebsen |  |                                      |  | Ivelina S. Metcheva, Ph.D., MBA President
|Title                        |  | CFO            |  |                                      | 
|                             |  |                |  |                                     
|Date:                        |  | 3/8/2010       |  |                                      |  | Date:                                     |  | 3/10/10
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

December 16, 2015

No. 04

- 15

- 00661

- CR

Roland HERNANDEZ

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas

, Appellee

From the 379th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015CR7447W

Honorable Ray Olivarri , Judge Presiding

ORDER

In accordance with this court’s opinion issued this date, this appeal is DISMISSED FOR

WANT OF JURISDICTION.

It is so ORDERED on December 16, 2015

.

_____________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 16th day of December, 2015

.

_____________________________ Keith E. Hottle, Clerk
### §5314. Implementation of comprehensive plan

#### (a) In general

The comprehensive plan shall be carried out during the period ending with the close of the ninth fiscal year following the fiscal year in which the comprehensive plan is submitted in its final form under section 5313(d)(2) of this title and shall be—

(1) carried out in accordance with, and meet the program objectives specified in, section 5313(a) of this title and section 5313(b) of this title;

(2) carried out, by the Federal agencies involved, in accordance with the allocation of functions and activities under section 5313(c) of this title; and

(3) funded by appropriations made to such agencies for each fiscal year of the program.

#### (b) Existing law not affected

Nothing in this subchapter may be construed to grant any new regulatory authority or to limit, expand, or otherwise modify any regulatory authority under existing law, or to establish new criteria, standards, or requirements for regulation under existing law.

(Pub. L. 101–445, title I, §104, Oct. 22, 1990, 104 Stat. 1040.)
#### 14.408-5 [Reserved]
### §587. Rules and regulations; cooperation with other agencies; compensation of officers and employees; effect on other laws

The Secretary may make such rules, regulations, and orders as may be necessary to carry out the provisions of this chapter, and may cooperate with any department or agency of the Government, any State, Territory, District, or possession, or department, agency, or political subdivision thereof, or any person, whether operating in one or more jurisdictions; and shall have the power to appoint, remove, and fix the compensation of such officers and employees not in conflict with existing law, and make such expenditures for rent outside the District of Columbia, printing, binding, telegrams, telephones, law books, books of reference, publications, furniture, stationery, office equipment, travel, and other supplies and expenses, including reporting services, as shall be necessary to the administration of this chapter in the District of Columbia and elsewhere, and as may be appropriated for by Congress. This chapter shall not abrogate nor nullify any other statute, whether State or Federal, dealing with the same subjects as this chapter; but it is intended that all such statutes shall remain in full force and effect except insofar as they are inconsistent herewith or repugnant hereto.

(June 10, 1933, ch. 59, §7, 48 Stat. 124.)
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

EL PASO COUNTY, TEXAS,

 

 Appellant,

v.

EL PASO COUNTY EMERGENCY 

DISTRICT NO. 1 and EL PASO 

COUNTY EMERGENCY DISTRICT NO. 

2,

 Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-19-00105-CV

Appeal from the

448th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 2016DCV4705)

O R D E R

The Court hereby resets the above-captioned cause for submission with oral argument to 

the 9:00 A.M. timeslot on December 12, 2019 in the Courtroom of the Eighth Court of Appeals, 

500 E. San Antonio, El Paso County Courthouse, Suite 1203, El Paso, Texas.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 9

th day of December, 2019.

PER CURIAM

Before Alley, C.J., Rodriguez and Palafox, JJ.
Dismiss and Opinion Filed July 30, 2015.

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 14

- 00590

- CV
JOYCE NEMONS , Appellant

V. JULIUS EKHATOR , Appellee
On Appeal from the 199th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 199

- 55250

- 2012


### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Bridges, Lang, and Schenck Opinion by Justice Lang Appellant’s brief was originally due March 1, 2015. On March 16, 2015, t his Court granted appellant an extension until March 31, 2015 file her brief. The extension order warned appellant that if she did not file her brief by that date, the appeal would be dismissed without further notice. To date, appellant has neither filed a brief nor communicated with the Court regarding the appeal. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See

. T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 38.8(a)(1),
42.3(c).

140590F.P05 /Douglas S. Lang/ DOUGLAS S. LANG JUSTICE– 2

– 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

JOYCE NEMONS, Appellant

No. 05

- 14

- 00590

- CV V. JULIUS EKHATOR, Appellee On Appeal from the 199th Judicial District Court, Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 199

- 55250

- 2012. Opinion delivered by Justice Lang, Justices Br idges and Schenck participating. In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal. We ORDER that appellee Julius Ekhator recover his costs of this appeal from appellant Joyce Nemons.

Judgment entered this 30th day of July, 2 015.
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

**____________** No. 22

- 10958 Summary Calendar

**____________ United States of America,**  Plaintiff

— Appellee **,**

versus **Jesse Martinez, Jr.,** Defendant

— Appellant

**.**

**______________________________** Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 5:21

- CR

- 96

- 1

**__________________ ____________**  Before **Jones, Haynes,** and **Oldham,** Circuit Judges

**. Per Curiam**  **:** *****
The attorney appointed to represent Jesse Martinez, Jr. , has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Martinez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s

**_____________________**

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4

. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED May 5, 2023 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 22-10958 Document: 00516740616 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/05/2023No. 22

- 10958

2 brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is **GRANTED** , counsel is excused from further re sponsibilities herein, and the appeal is **DISMISSED**

. See **5th Cir. R.** 42.2

. Case: 22-10958 Document: 00516740616 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/05/2023
1209.471 Appeals. Based on the decision by the SDO, the respondent may elect to request reconsideration as provided for in paragraph (a) of this section. If the request for reconsideration is denied, the respondent may seek judicial review as provided for in paragraph (b) of this section. ( a ) *Request for reconsideration.* Upon receiving a final decision to debar from the SDO, a debarred individual or entity may ask the SDO to reconsider the debarment decision or to modify the debarment by reducing the time period or narrowing the scope of the debarment. This request must be in writing and supported with documentation.
( b ) *Judicial review.* A suspended or debarred individual or entity may seek judicial review upon denial of a request for reconsideration.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Gregory Anderson, M.S., M.P.H., Scientific Review Officer, CDC, 1600 Clifton Road, NE, Mailstop US8-1, Atlanta, Georgia 30329-4027, (404) 718-8833,                         *ganderson@cdc.gov*.                    

                        The Director, Strategic Business Initiatives Unit, Office of the Chief Operating Officer, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, has been delegated the authority to sign                         **Federal Register**                         notices pertaining to announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, for both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.                    

Kalwant Smagh,

Director, Strategic Business Initiatives Unit, Office of the Chief Operating Officer, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

[FR Doc. 2021-00284 Filed 1-8-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 546 

To reduce temporarily the royalty required to be paid for sodium produced 

on Federal lands, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 7, 2017 

Mr. BARRASSO (for himself, Mr. WYDEN, Mr. ENZI, Mr. MERKLEY, Mr. 

WICKER, Mr. ALEXANDER, Ms. STABENOW, Mr. BLUMENTHAL, Mr. 

GARDNER, Mr. ISAKSON, Mr. MURPHY, Mr. ROBERTS, Mr. MORAN, Mr. 

CASEY, Mr. CORNYN, and Mrs. FEINSTEIN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To reduce temporarily the royalty required to be paid for 

sodium produced on Federal lands, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘American Soda Ash 

5 Competitiveness Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REDUCTION IN ROYALTY RATE ON SODA ASH. 

7 Notwithstanding section 102(a)(9) of the Federal 

8 Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 546 IS

1 1701(a)(9)), section 24 of the Mineral Leasing Act (30 

2 U.S.C. 262), and the terms of any lease under that Act, 

3 the royalty rate on the quantity or gross value of the out4 put of sodium compounds and related products at the 

5 point of shipment to market from Federal land in the 5- 

6 year period beginning on the date of enactment of this 

7 Act shall be 2 percent. 

Æ 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### 1352.213-71 Instructions for submitting quotations under the simplified acquisition threshold—non-commercial.

As prescribed in 48 CFR 1313.302-1-70, insert the following provision:

# Instructions for Submitting Quotations Under the Simplified Acquisition Threshold—Non-Commercial (Date)

(a) *North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code and small business size standard.* The NAICS code and small business size standard for this acquisition is ________.

(b) *Submission of quotations.* Submit quotations to the office specified in this solicitation at or before the exact time specified in this solicitation. At a minimum, quotations must show—

(1) The solicitation number;

(2) The name, address, and telephone number of the offeror;

(3) Acknowledgment of solicitation amendments;

(4) A technical description showing that the offeror can supply the requirements in the specifications or statement of work in sufficient detail to allow the Government to evaluate the quotation in accordance with the evaluation factors stated in the solicitation.

(5) Past performance information, when included as an evaluation factor, to include recent and relevant contracts for the same or similar items and reference information (including contract numbers, points of contact with telephone numbers and other relevant information).

(6) Price and any supporting details for the price, as requested in the solicitation.

(c) Offerors are responsible for submitting quotations, and any modifications thereto, so as to reach the Government office designated in the solicitation by the time specified. The offeror's initial quotation should contain the offeror's best terms from a price and technical standpoint. The Government may reject any or all quotations if such action is in the public interest; accept other than the lowest quotation; and waive informalities and minor irregularities in quotations received.

(End of clause)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
EASTERN DIVISION

TRUSTEES of the CHICAGO REGIONAL )
COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS PENSION }
FUND, et al. )
)
Plaintiffs, ) Case No. 11 C 9001
)

) Judge Gottschall
)
v. )
)
ACER ENTERPRISES, INC. )
: )
)

Defendant.

Motion for Entry of Judgment

Plaintiffs, by its attorney, Daniel P. McAnally, move this Honorable Court for an
entry of judgment and in support Plaintiffs state:

1. This is and ERISA trust fund case seeking delinquent contributions, interest,

liquidated damages, dues check-off and attorney fees.

2. On February 21, 2012 this Court entered an Order of Default against the

Defendant for its failure to answer to the complaint.

3. The Defendant submitted the monthly contribution reports but failed to
submit the ERISA contributions shown to be owed in the amount of $35,409.92 for the
months of August 2011 through December 2011. The Defendant also failed to remit the
union dues it withheld from the employees’ wages. The amount of dues withheld is
$1,637.35 for the period August 2011 through December 2011. (Exhibit 1, affidavit of J ohn
Libby)


5. The Defendant owes interest on the unpaid ERISA contributions in the
amount of $353.93 pursuant to the Trust Agreements and 29 U.S.C. §1132(g)(2)(B).
(Exhibit 1)

6. The Defendant owes liquidated damages on the unpaid ERISA contributions
in the amount of $3,394.78 for the period April 2011 through January 2012 pursuant to the
Collective Bargaining Agreements, the Trust Agreements and 29 U.S.C. §1132(g)(2)(C)(ii).
(Exhibit 1)

7. The Defendant owes the sum of $2,655.25 for necessary and reasonable
attorney fees and costs of $405.00 which are collectible under the terms of the Collective
Bargaining Agreement, the Trust Agreements and 29 U.S.C. §1132(g)(2)(D). (Exhibit 2,
affidavit of Daniel P. McAnally)

WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs pray that their motion for entry of judgment be granted
in the amount of $43,856.23.

Respectively submitted,

s/ DANIEL P. McANALLY
Attorney for Plaintiffs

Whitfield McGann & Ketterman
111 E. Wacker Drive

Suite 2600

Chicago, IL 60601

312.251.9700