alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway, J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk February 17, 2010

jam 

# Order

February 17, 2010

140488 (26)

BENNIE GRAVES,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 140488
COA: 293749 DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,

Defendant-Appellee.

___________________ ________________

On order of the Chief Ju stice, the motion to waive f ees is considered and it
is DENIED because MCL 600.2 963 requires that a prisone r pursuing a civil action be liable for filing fees. Within 21 days of the certification of this order, plaintiff shall pay to the Clerk of the Court the initial partial filing fee of $9.00, shall submit a copy of this order with the payment, and shall refile the copy of the pleadings which is being returned
with this order. Failure to comply with this orde r shall result in the appeal not being
filed in this Court. If plaintiff timely files the partial fee and refiles the pleadings, monthly payments shall be made to the Department of Corrections in an amount of 50 percent of the deposits made to plain tiff’s account until the payments equal the balance due of $366.00. This amount shall then be remitted to this Court. Pursuant to MCL 600.2963(8) plaintiff shall not file further appeals in this Court until the entry fee in this case is paid in full.
The Clerk of the Court sh all furnish two copies of this order to plaintiff and return plaintiff’s pleadings with this order.
ATTORNEYS AT LAW

February 23, 2015

VIA ELECTRONIC FILING

US. Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Ave. S.E.

Washington, DC 20590

Re: Air Caledonie International S.A. Passenger Manifest Regulation

Docket 081'-1998-3305

Dear Sir or Madam:

Pursuant to the U.S. Department of Transportation's Passenger Manifest Regulation, 14 C.F.R.

Part 243, Air Caledonie International S.A. (Airealin) states the lollowing:

• Airealin does not currently operate any covered Hight segments under the statute, and

sen'es the U.S. solely under a codeshare agreement with Air Tahiti Nui. If and when

Aircalin begins operating transpacific flights to or from the U.S., it will manually collect

passenger information for all U.8. citizens at the time of boarding;

• Record and maintain a record of the full name and passport number of U.S. citizen

passengers;

• Request the name and telephone number of a contact person for each U.S. citizen

passenger; and

• In the event of an aviation disaster, Aircalin will transmit the passenger information to

the U.S. Department of State via facsimile and to the NTSB as required.

• The name(s) and telephone nunlber(s) of a person or persons who are available at any

time a covered flight segment is operated and who can be consulted regarding the

collection of this information will be provided if and when Aircalin begins to operate

such covered flight segments.

<R~:> __

Evelyn D. SaIlr

Drew M. Derco

Counsel for Air Caledonie International S.A.
Fiscal Year 2004 Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies

District of Columbia

Maximum Required

Expenditures For 

Choice-Related Maximum Per-Child

Transportation Expenditure For

FY 2004 Title I And Supplemental Supplemental

LEA ID District Allocation* Educational Services** Educational Services***

1100030 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PUBLIC SCHOOLS 49,372,196 9,874,439 2,343.58

1199999 PART D SUBPART 2 0 0 0.00

* Actual amounts received by LEAs will be smaller than shown here due to State-level adjustments to Federal Title I allocations. States adjust

 allocations, for example, to reflect LEA boundary changes or the creation of new LEAs, including charter school LEAs, that are not accounted

 for in the Department's calculations. States also are permitted to reserve up to 1 percent of allocations for administration and generally must

 reserve 4 percent in fiscal year 2004 (up from 2 percent in previous years) for school improvement activities. These adjustments will reduce the

 actual amounts available under all three columns of the table.

** An LEA must use up to an amount equal to 20 percent of its Title I, Part A allocation (the “20-percent reservation”) received from the State 

 to cover choice-related transportation costs for students who exercise a choice option and to pay for supplemental educational services for

 students whose parents request such services. The 20-percent reservation may include Title I, Part A funds or funding from other Federal,

 State, local, and private sources. The amount shown in this column is the Department’s estimate of the amount that affected LEAs - those

 with schools identified for improvement, corrective action, or restructuring - may have to spend to meet this requirement. Actual 

 expenditures will depend on such factors as the number of students exercising a choice option or receiving supplemental educational services and

 the costs of satisfying these requests. An LEA has discretion to determine the allocation of these funds between choice-related transportation

 and supplemental educational services, except that it must spend at least one-quarter of the 20-percent reservation - or an amount equal to

 5 percent of its Title I, Part A allocation - on each activity if there is demand for both from students and their parents.

*** An LEA that must arrange for supplemental educational services is required to pay, for each child receiving services, the lesser of the actual cost

 of the services or an amount equal to the LEA’s Title I, Part A allocation received from the State divided by the number of poor students in the

 LEA, as determined by estimates produced by the US Bureau of the Census. Thus the amount shown in this column reflects the statutory “cap”

 on per-child expenditures for supplemental educational services.
EXECUTION COPY

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Agreement And Plan of Merger

Among

Tellabs, Inc.

Orbit Merger Sub, Inc.

And

Ocular Networks, Inc.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dated as of November 29, 2001

 

 

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS
#### Carmelo Durso, Respondent, v. Modern Biscuit Corp., Appellant.

— In an action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff, an employee of defendant, the latter appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated December 22, 1959, denying its motion for judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the action is barred by the provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Law (Rules Civ. Prae., rule 113), and on the further ground that the court does not have jurisdiction of the subject of the action (Rules Civ. Prae., rule 107, subd. 1). Order reversed, *1037with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with $10 costs. The complaint alleges that plaintiff was injured when he was assaulted by a fellow employee, and charges defendant with liability on the ground that it retained said fellow employee in its employ with knowledge of his dangerous and assaultive propensities and failed to take reasonable precautions to secure plaintiff against injury. Defendant pleaded as an affirmative defense and proved in support of its motion that it had secured workmen’s compensation insurance for its employees. It therefore claimed that the action was barred by the Workmen’s Compensation Law. If plaintiff’s injuries arose in the course of and out of his employment they are compensable under the Workmen’s Compensation Law and plaintiff’s exclusive remedy is prescribed by that statute. If they did not arise out of his employment, defendant is not answerable therefor unless they resulted from an intentional tort committed by it. The complaint does not allege a cause of action for an intentional tort by defendant, nor did plaintiff assert in opposition to the motion any facts which would constitute such a cause of action. Moreover, the awards of compensation by the Workmen’s Compensation Board constituted a finding by the board that plaintiff’s injuries arose out of and in the course of the employment. By virtue of that finding, which is binding and conclusive until vacated or modified by direct proceedings under the Workmen’s Compensation Law, plaintiff’s sole remedy is under that statute. *(Foca*v. *Federal Stevedoring Go.,*280 App. Div. 940, 941, affd. 305 N. Y. 648.) Accordingly, defendant’s motion for judgment should have been granted. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Ughetta, Kleinfeld and Christ, JJ., concur.
1333.104-70 Protests to GAO and Court of Federal Claims. ( a ) Insert clause 1352.233-71, *GAO and Court of Federal Claims Protests,* in all DOC solicitations, except those for the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.
( b ) Only Procurement Counsel shall communicate with the Government Accountability Office (GAO), the Court of Federal Claims and the Department of Justice regarding applicable protests. Procurement Counsel shall be responsible for preparation and submission of the agency report to the GAO and litigation reports to the Department of Justice.
( c ) The designee authorized to authorize, on a nondelegable basis, the award of a contract when the agency has received notice from the GAO of a preaward protest filed directly with the GAO is set forth in CAM 1301.70.
( d ) The designee authorized to authorize, on a nondelegable basis, contract performance notwithstanding protest after award is set forth in CAM 1301.70.
( e ) The designee authorized to report and explain the reasons why the agency has not fully implement GAO recommendations with respect to a protest is set forth in CAM 1301.70.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

ROBERT JESSIE MORALES,

 

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 State.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-20-00102-CR

Appeal from the

143rd District Court

of Ward County, Texas 

(TC# 19-09-06141-CRW)

O R D E R

The Court received and filed the supplemental clerk’s record as requested in its order 

issued October 28, 2021 containing the appointment of Robert V. Garcia. The appeal is therefore 

reinstated, and the Appellant’s brief is now due January 7, 2022.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 8th day of December, 2021.

PER CURIAM

Before Rodriguez, Palafox and Alley, JJ.
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF


THE
SARBANES - OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Composite Technology Corporation (the "Company") Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Domonic
J. Carney, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to


Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/
      Domonic J. CarneyDomonic
      J. CarneyChief Financial
      Officer(Principal
      Financial and Accounting
Officer)




Date:  December
14, 2009
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****New interpretations ofPaleozoic stratigraphy and history in the northern Laramie Range and vicinity,southeast Wyoming**
 
Report | Plate One | Plate Two
 
SuDoc Number:I 19.16:1450
Item Number:0624 (online)
CGP systemNumber:001057087
 
May 15, 2018
#### Mary L. Traversone, an Infant, by Angelo Traversone, Her Guardian ad Litem, et al., Respondents, v. Macfadden School for Children, Appellant.

. In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated April 5, 1960, granting plaintiffs’ motion: (a) to vacate the dismissal of the action under rule 302 of the Rules of Civil Practice, and (b) to restore the action to the Trial Term Reserve Calendar. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Christ, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur; Beldock, J., dissents and votes to reverse the order and to deny the motion.
#### In re VAN WYCK et al. In the matter of Robert A. Van Wyck and others.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

November 6, 1903.)

F. Bien, for appellant.

T. Farley, for respondent.

No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 167 

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Rules in the One 

Hundred Eighteenth Congress. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 27, 2023 

Mr. COLE (for himself and Mr. MCGOVERN) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration 

RESOLUTION 

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on 

Rules in the One Hundred Eighteenth Congress. 

1 Resolved, 

2 SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES. 

3 For the expenses of the Committee on Rules (here4 after in this resolution referred to as the ‘‘Committee’’), 

5 including the expenses of all staff salaries, there shall be 

6 paid, out of the applicable accounts of the House of Rep7 resentatives for committee salaries and expenses, not more 

8 than $8,335,614 for the One Hundred Eighteenth Con9 gress. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 167 IH 

1 SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS. 

2 Of the amount specified in section 1— 

3 (1) not more than $4,167,807 shall be available 

4 for expenses incurred during the period beginning at 

5 noon on January 3, 2023, and ending immediately 

6 before noon on January 3, 2024; and 

7 (2) not more than $4,167,807 shall be available 

8 for expenses incurred during the period beginning at 

9 noon on January 3, 2024, and ending immediately 

10 before noon on January 3, 2025. 

11 SEC. 3. VOUCHERS. 

12 Payments under this resolution shall be made on 

13 vouchers authorized by the Committee, signed by the 

14 Chairman of the Committee, and approved in the manner 

15 directed by the Committee on House Administration. 

16 SEC. 4. REGULATIONS. 

17 Amounts made available under this resolution shall 

18 be expended in accordance with regulations prescribed by 

19 the Committee on House Administration. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT
32.1





Certification
of Principal Executive Officer


Pursuant
to U.S.C. Section 1350


As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




Pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned
officer of Mandalay Media, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), does
hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:





The
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ending March 31, 2009 of the Company
(the “Form 10-K”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Form
10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.




Dated: July
14, 2009


/s/ James LefkowitzJames
      LefkowitzPresident
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Wages in the Rayon Industry, May 1944

              																	United States. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Division of Industrial Relations. 						*Wages in the Rayon Industry, May 1944 : Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 806*,												Washington, D.C: 								G.P.O., 										1945,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/4276,			accessed on September 12, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
No. 784.

#### Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company *v.*Industrial Commission of the State of Illinois (Maria Kiley, Administratrix, etc.).

March 22, 1920.

*Mr. Gar-diner Lathrop*for petitioner.

*Mr. Leo L. Donahoe*for respondent.

Petition for a writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of the'State of Illinois denied.
**EXHIBIT 13.3**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated March 20, 2015, relating to the consolidated financial statements of Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. appearing in the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. for the year ended December 31, 2014 and to the Company’s Registration Statements on Form S-8 (SEC File No.: 333-195120) and Forms F-3 (SEC File Nos.: 333-193471 and 333-195144).

 

|               |   |                      |   |
|--------------------|--------|---------------------------|--------|
| Date: May 11, 2015 | By:    | */s/ Manning Elliott LLP* |   |
|               |   | Vancouver, Canada         |   |
Exhibit 31.1


      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Michael Schumacher, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this  quarterly  report on Form 10-QSB of Federal  Mortgage
Corporation of Puerto Rico, Inc.

2.   Based on my knowledge,  this  quarterly  report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made, not  misleading  with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3.   Based on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included in this quarterly  report,  fairly present in all material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.   The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and I are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a)   designed such  disclosure  controls and  procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others  within those  entities,  particularly  during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b)   evaluated the  effectiveness  of the registrant's  disclosure  controls and
procedures  as of a date  within  90  days  prior  to the  filing  date  of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c)   presented in this quarterly report our conclusions  about the effectiveness
of the  disclosure  controls and  procedures  based on our  evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date.

5.   The registrant's other certifying  officers and I have disclosed,  based on
our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee
of  registrant's  board of  directors  (or  persons  performing  the  equivalent
functions):

a)   all  significant  deficiencies  in the  design  or  operation  of  internal
controls  which  could  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability to record,
process,  summarize  and  report  financial  data  and have  identified  for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b)   any fraud,  whether or not  material,  that  involves  management  or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6.   The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether there were significant  changes in internal controls or
in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent  evaluation,  including any corrective  actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date:  August 15, 2005


/s/ Michael Schumacher
----------------------
Michael Schumacher
President, Chief Executive Officer, Treasurer,
 and Chief Financial Officer
#### 1301.104 Applicability.

The CAR applies to all Department of Commerce (DOC) acquisitions as defined in part 2 of the FAR, except where expressly excluded.
#### Paul J. Hanson et al. *v.*A. Earl Wood, Commissioner of Transportation of the State of Connecticut

*Victor Feingold,*assistant attorney general, for the appellee (defendant).

*Robert A. Slavitt,*for the appellants (plaintiffs).

Argued January 7

decided January 7, 1975

The defendant’s motion to dismiss the appeal from the Superior Court in Fairfield County is denied without prejudice to renewing it upon the same grounds pending the determination by the committee to accept or reject finally the draft finding.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, D.C. IN THE MA TIER OF AIRAMBULANCE BY AIRTREK, INC. DocketNo. FAA-2011-1003 (FAAEnforcement Docket 2009EA030037) (Civil Penalty Action) Ronnie A. Yoder, ChiefAdministrative Law Judge 'I 

### ]

For the purposes ofthe hearing in this matter, the parties hereby submit the stipulations they have reached, as follows: 1. Air Trek selected the Garmin GNS 530 and 530 WAAS upgrade for installation in N744AT.
2. The Cessna 550 Citation turbojet is a transport category airplane certificated underPart 25 oftheFARs.
3. N744ATis a Cessna 550 Citation turbojet aircraft.

14. Wayne Carr is the president ofAirTrek.

inton, Esq. iatio 

### w Experts Research Court, Suite 450 Rockville, MD 20850

2 Alfred R. Johnson, Jr. Regional Counsel By: Step en W. Bri , Attorney Federal Aviation Administration 1Aviation Plaza Jamaica, NY 11434

### CERTIFICATE_Q.f SERYICE I hereby certifY that on this day copies ofthe foregoing Submission ofStipulations were served by first class mail and/or fax, as indicated, tothe following: Federal Aviation Administration (Original and one copy) Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur WrightBuilding- Room 2014 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington; D.C. 20591 (mail only) The Honorable Ronnie A. Yoder U.S. Department ofTransportation Office ofHearings, M-20, Room El2-320 1200 New Jersey Ave., S.E. Washington, DC 20590 (mail and fax 

### to: (202) 366-7536) Date: June 25, 2012

3