alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §§132 to 137–10. Repealed. June 27, 1952, ch. 477, title IV, §403(a)(1), (8), (11), (13), (16), (48), 66 Stat. 279, 280, eff. Dec. 24, 1952

Section 132, act Feb. 5, 1917, ch. 29, §2, 39 Stat. 875, related to head tax. See section 1351 of this title.

Section 133, act Mar. 4, 1909, ch. 299, §1, 35 Stat. 982, related to covering of moneys into Treasury. See section 1356(b) of this title.

Section 134, act Feb. 3, 1905, ch. 297, §1, 33 Stat. 684, authorized refunds of head taxes erroneously collected under act Mar. 3, 1903, ch. 1012, §1, 32 Stat. 1213. Said act Mar. 3, 1903 was repealed by acts Feb. 20, 1907, ch. 1134, §43, 34 Stat. 911; Feb. 5, 1917, ch. 29, §38, 39 Stat. 897.

Section 135, R.S. §2164, related to State tax or charge on immigrants.

Section 136, acts Feb. 5, 1917, ch. 29, §3, 39 Stat. 875; June 5, 1920, ch. 243, 41 Stat. 981; Mar. 4, 1929, ch. 690, §1(d), 45 Stat. 1551; Sept. 27, 1944, ch. 418, §2, 58 Stat. 746, related to exclusion of aliens. See sections 1102, 1154, and 1182 of this title.

Section 137, acts Oct. 16, 1918, ch. 186, §1, 40 Stat. 1012; June 5, 1920, ch. 251, 41 Stat. 1008; June 28, 1940, ch. 439, title II, §23(a), 54 Stat. 673; May 25, 1948, ch. 338, 62 Stat. 268; Sept. 23, 1950, ch. 1024, title I, §22, 64 Stat. 1006, related to exclusion of subversive aliens. See sections 1101 and 1182 of this title.

Section 137–1, acts Oct. 16, 1918, ch. 186, §2, 40 Stat. 1012; June 28, 1940, ch. 439, title II, §23(b), 54 Stat. 673; Sept. 23, 1950, ch. 1024, title I, §22, 64 Stat. 1006, related to exceptions as to certain aliens seeking temporary entrance. See section 1182(d)(2) of this title.

Section 137–2, acts Oct. 16, 1918, ch. 186, §3, 40 Stat. 1012; Sept. 23, 1950, ch. 1024, title I, §22, 64 Stat. 1006, related to prohibition against issuance of visas to subversive aliens.

Section 137–3, act Oct. 16, 1918, ch. 186, §4, as added Sept. 23, 1950, ch. 1024, title I, §22, 64 Stat. 1006, related to deportation of subversive aliens.

Sections 137–4 to 137–8, act Oct. 16, 1918, ch. 186, §§5–9, as added Sept. 23, 1950, ch. 1024, title I, §22, 64 Stat. 1006, related to temporary exclusion of suspects, subversive aliens and penalties. See sections 1102, 1182, 1225, 1253, 1326 and 1327 of this title.

Section 137–9, act Mar. 28, 1951, ch. 23, §1, 65 Stat. 28, related to clarification of immigration status of certain aliens.

Section 137–10, act Mar. 28, 1951, ch. 23, §2, 65 Stat. 28, related to recordation of entry for permanent residence.
#### The People of the State of New York v. Hy Hilzen.

Motion to dismiss appeal granted. Concur—Breitel, J. P., Rabin, McNally, Stevens and Eager, JJ.
#### David Jensen *v.*Planning and Zoning Commission of the Town of Cromwell et al.

*Thomas P. Byrne,*in support of the petition.

Submitted November 25

decided December 3, 1974

The petition for certification by the named defendant for appeal from the Court of Common Pleas in Middlesex County is granted.
#### 1252.217-78 Discharge of Liens.

As prescribed at 1217.7001(b), insert the following clause:

# Discharge of Liens (NOV 2022)

(a) The Contractor shall immediately discharge or cause to be discharged, any lien or right *in rem* of any kind, other than in favor of the Government, that exists or arises in connection with work done or materials furnished under this contract.

(b) If any such lien or right *in rem* is not immediately discharged, the Government, at the expense of the Contractor, may discharge, or cause to be discharged, the lien or right.

(End of clause)
<PAGE>

Exhibit 10(h)-5

FOURTH SUPPLEMENT TO THE
CAPACITY AND ENERGY SALES AGREEMENT
FROM PENNSYLVANIA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY (PP&L)
TO BALTIMORE GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY (BG&E)

	Fourth Supplement (Fourth Supplemental Agreement) dated July 
2, 1992 to the Capacity and Energy Sales Agreement (Basic 
Agreement), dated January 28, 1988, as supplemented by a First 
Supplemental Agreement dated August 10, 1988, and by a Third 
Supplemental Agreement dated May 24, 1991 between Pennsylvania 
Power & Light Company and Baltimore Gas & Electric Company.

	1.  This supplemental agreement shall become effective on 
June 1, 1992, unless otherwise ordered by the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission.  The terms and conditions of the Basic 
Agreement, as supplemented by the First Supplemental Agreement 
and the Second Supplemental Agreement, and the Third Supplemental 
Agreement, shall remain in full force and effect, except as 
amended herein.

	2.  Exhibit C Revision No. 2 shall be amended to read:

	      "The Installed Capacity Rate shall be $193 per 
megawatt per day."

	    Such amended Exhibit C Revision No. 2 is reflected on 
Exhibit C Revision No. 3, attached hereto and made a part hereof, 
which supersedes Exhibit C Revision No. 2.

                              PENNSYLVANIA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY

                              By:  ___/s/_______________________

WITNESS:                      Name: __F. A. Long________________
                                      Sr. Vice President-
                                      System Power &
_________________________     Title:__Engineering_______________
Cheryl D. Cincilla

                              BALTIMORE GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY

                              By:  __/s/________________________

WITNESS:                      Name: __Herbert D. Coss, Jr.______

                                      Vice President-Electric
                                      Interconnection & 
_________________________     Title: _Transmission______________


<PAGE>
                                            EXHIBIT C
                                            REVISION NO. 3

                  INSTALLED CAPACITY RATE

	The Installed Capacity Rate shall be $193 per megawatt per 
day.
### §7424. Regulations

The Secretary may issue such regulations as may be necessary to carry out this subchapter and the power vested in the Secretary under this subchapter.

(Pub. L. 104–127, title V, §525, Apr. 4, 1996, 110 Stat. 1048.)
I:\Teleport\Mono\lps100553\pubs.usgs.gov\wri\wri01-4267\pdf\wri01_4267.pdf
### §497. Separability

If any provision of this chapter is declared unconstitutional or the applicability thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the validity of the remainder of the chapter and the applicability of such provisions to other persons and circumstances shall not be affected thereby.

(Mar. 3, 1927, ch. 309, §4, 44 Stat. 1356.)
§ 47.6 Procedures. ( a ) *Submitting group applications.* Applications on behalf of a civilian or contractual group shall be submitted to the Secretary of the Air Force using the instructions in appendix A to this part.
( b ) *Processing group applications.* ( 1 ) When received, the recorder shall review the application for sufficiency and either return it for more information or accept it for consideration and announce acceptance in the Federal Register.
( 2 ) The recorder shall send the application to the appropriate advisory panel for historical review and analysis.
( 3 ) When received, the recorder shall send the advisory panel's report to the applicant for comment. The applicant's comments shall be referred to the advisory panel if significant disagreement requires resolution. Additional comments from the historians also shall be referred to the applicant for comment.
( 4 ) The DoD Civilian/Military Service Board shall consider the group application, as established, in paragraph (a) and paragraphs (b) (1) through (3) of this section.
( 5 ) After the Secretary of the Air Force makes a decision, the recorder shall notify the applicant of the decision and announce it in the “Federal Register.”
( c ) *Submitting individual applications.* When a group is recognized, individual members may apply to the appropriate Military Department or to the Coast Guard for discharge documents. Submit applications on DD Form 2168, “Application for Discharge of Member or Survivor of Member of Group Certified to Have Performed Active Duty with the Armed Forces of the United States.” An application on behalf of a deceased or incompetent member submitted by the next of kin must be accompanied by proof of death or incompetence.
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

|  |
|--|
|  |
|  | HomeAdult Ed and LiteracyPrograms/InitiativesCareer and Technical EdOffice ContactsCommunity CollegesReports & ResourcesCorrectional Education NewsCommunity Colleges
Students  |Faculty and Staff |Initiatives |  Research | STEM

**Students**

We hope that community college and other postsecondary students can use this list of resources to help them find a college, finance their  education, manage their money, and obtain additional supports that can help them persist in school, as well as finding information on scholarships, internships, and career assistance.

**Faculty and Staff**

 This section has a number of programs and resources of particular interest to  the faculty and staff working with students at community colleges. In  particular, you can find open educational resources that are free or low cost to access, several communities of practice for reaching out to peers at other institutions, and federal grants specifically for faculty development.

**Initiatives**

 Learn more about the current  initiatives for community colleges and areas of interest to community college  faculty, staff, and students.

**Research**

 In our Research section you'll find  information that focuses on community college issues, such as work force development, and community college completion. You will find OCTAE's National Center for Innovation in Career and Technical Education which performs scientifically based  research and evaluation to expand the understanding, increase the  effectiveness, and improve the delivery of career and technical education (CTE), the Community College Research Center which assesses the problems and  performance of community colleges in order to contribute to the development of  practice and policy that expands access to higher education and promotes  success for all students, and the Community College Consortium for Open Educational Resources with  the goal of expanding access to education by promoting awareness and adoption of Open Educational Resources (OER). Much more can be found here.

**STEM**

  This page is a result of the  Interagency Working Group on Undergraduate STEM Education (IWG Undergrad). The  group consists of: Department of Agriculture, Department of Commerce,  Department of Defense, Department of Education, Department of Energy,  Department of Health and Human Services, Department of the Interior, Department  of Transportation, Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), National Science  Foundation (NSF), National Space and Aeronautics Association (NASA), and the  Smithsonian Institution. These linkswill provide community college  students, teachers, presidents and faculty members’ resources for grant,  educational and funding opportunities.
   Printable view  Last Modified: 05/13/2022 |
**CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**
 **AND
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**
 **PURSUANT
TO**
 **18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 The
undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to, and as required by, 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
the Quarterly Report of DCAP Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the
period ended September 30, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that
information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.
 
 
 Date:
      November 9, 2005
    /s/
      Barry Goldstein
      Barry
      Goldstein,
      Chief
      Executive Officer and
      Chief
      Financial Officer
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk March 27, 2013

p0320 

# Order

March 27, 2013

146212

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 146212

COA: 304875

Saginaw CC: 10

- 034923

- FH

JAMES EARLY HARRIS, JR.,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 27, 2012

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is GRANTED, limited to the issue

whether the evidence was sufficient to sustain the defendant’s conviction of extortion.
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

No. 20

- 50249 Summary Calendar

**United States of America,** Plaintiff

— Appellee **,**

versus
**Arturo Coronado Angel**

**- De Leon,**  Defendant

— Appellant

**.**

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 2:19

- CR

- 961

- 1

Before **Higginbotham, Jones,** and **Costa ,**  Circuit Judges

**. Per Curiam**  : * Arturo Coronado Angel

- De Leon was convicted of illegal reentry, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326, and sentenced above the advisory guidelines range to 24 months of imprisonment and a three

- year term of supervised

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED August 10, 2020

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 20-50249 Document: 00515520860 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/10/2020No. 20

- 50249

2 release. The Government moves for summary a ffirmance or, alternatively, for an extension of time to file its brief. The sole issue raised on appeal is whether it violates the Constitution to apply the enhanced sentencing range in § 1326(b) based on a prior conviction that was not alleged in the ind ictment or found by a jury beyond a reasonable doubt. Angel De

- Leon concedes that the claim is foreclosed by Almendarez

- Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224 (1998), however, and raises it only to preserve the issue for further review. Accordingly, the mo tion for summary affirmance is **GRANTED** , and the Government’s alternative motion for an extension of time is **DENIED**

. The judgment of the district court is **AFFIRMED**

. Case: 20-50249 Document: 00515520860 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/10/2020
FY 2023 AGENCY FINANCIAL REPORT 206 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

Other Information (Unaudited)

Civil Monetary Penalty Adjustment 

for Inflation

The Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act Improvements Act of 2015, as amended, 

requires agencies to make regular and consistent inflationary adjustments of civil monetary 

penalties to maintain their deterrent effect. To improve compliance with the act, and in 

response to multiple audits and recommendations, agencies should report annually in the 

Other Information section the most recent inflationary adjustments to civil monetary 

penalties to ensure penalty adjustments are both timely and accurate.

Location for Penalty Update Details:

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2023/01/30/2023-01596/adjustment-ofcivil-monetary-penalties-for-inflation

Table 21

Penalty Authority Date of Previous 

Adjustment

Date of Current 

Adjustment

Current Penalty 

Level

Failure to provide information for cost of higher education 20 USC 

1015(c)(5) 04-20-22 01-30-23 $ 45,429

Failure to provide information regarding teacherpreparation programs20 USC 

1022d(a)(3) 04-20-22 01-30-23 37,839

Violation of Title IV of the HEA 20 USC 1082(g) 04-20-22 01-30-23 67,544

Violation of Title IV of the HEA 20 USC 

1094(c)(3)(B) 04-20-22 01-30-23 67,544

Failure to disclose information to minor children and parents 20 USC 

1228c(c)(2)(E) 04-20-22 01-30-23 1,993

Improper lobbying for government grants and contracts

31 USC 

1352(c)(1) and 

c(2)(A)

04-20-22 01-30-23 23,727 to 237,268

False claims and statements 31 USC 3802(a)(1) 

and (a)(2) 04-20-22 01-30-23 13,508
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Donald Piersol McCaskey, Appellant.

— Appeal by defendant from a judgment of *1011the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, rendered April 26, 1976, convicting him of possession of weapons, etc., as a misdemeanor, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. Judgment reversed, on the law, indictment dismissed, and case remitted to the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, for the purpose of entering an order in its discretion pursuant to CPL 160.50. This matter began with the defendant’s arrest on April 15, 1972. His trial was delayed by the People’s appeal from an order suppressing a weapon found in the defendant’s car. The People prevailed on the appeal *(People v McCaskey,*46 AD2d 692). That appeal was decided by this court in October, 1974. After winning, the prosecution did nothing to bring the case to trial and the defendant did nothing to prevent it from being brought to trial. The defendant finally pleaded guilty to possession of weapons, etc., as a misdemeanor, in March, 1976, after his motion to dismiss the indictment, on the ground that his right to a speedy trial was violated, was denied. The People offer no explanation for the delay and agree that the defendant is entitled to a dismissal of his indictment under the circumstances. We agree (see CPL 30.30, subd 1, par [a]; *People v Staley,*41 NY2d 789; *People v Singer,*44 NY2d 241). The court commends the District Attorney for his candor and forthrightness in consenting to a reversal of the judgment and dismissal of the indictment. Titone, J. P., Suozzi, O’Connor and Mangano, JJ., concur.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ANTHONY MCGEE,

Applicant,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondent. No. 18

- 72243

ORDER *

Application to File Second or Successive

Petition Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255

Argued and Submitted November 13, 2019

San Francisco, California

Before: THOMAS, Chief Judge, and TASHIMA and WARDLAW, Circuit

Judges.

The application for authorization to file a second or successive 28 U.S.C. §

2255 mo tion in the district court is denied. The applicant seeks to rely on McCoy

v. Louisiana , 138 S. Ct. 1500 (2018), but has not demonstrated that even if McCoy

were held to be retroactive to cases on collateral review, it would govern the facts

of his case. The applicant has therefore not made a prima facie showing under 28

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3. 

# FILED

JAN 10 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2

U.S.C. § 2255(h) of “a new rule of constitutional law, made retroactive to cases on

collateral review by the Supreme Court, that was previously unavailable.”

Any pending motions are den ied as moot.

No further filings will be entertained in this case.

DENIED.
##### 



Exhibit 31.3
 
      a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andd)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 June 7, 2006
    /s/ Ira D. KaplanIra D. KaplanChief Financial Officer
#### 1353.107 Obtaining forms.

The DOC forms may be obtained from any DOC contracting office.
(September 20, 1963)

#### Olive Manning, Appellant, v. William J. Burk et al., Respondents.

— Order of April 20, 1960, insofar as appealed from, unanimously reversed, without costs of this appeal to either party, and motion granted, without costs. Order of April 6, 1959, unanimously reversed and the judgment based thereon vacated, without costs. Memorandum: While we do not condone the nnseemly delay in the prosecution of this action by the plaintiff and her attorney, nevertheless, under all the facts and circumstances of the case, in the exercise of a reasonable discretion, the motion should have been granted. We also give consideration to the fact that there is an action still pending arising out of the same accident which must be tried in any event. (See *Speier*v. *St. Francis Church,*3 A D 2d 732.) (Appeal from judgment and order of Erie Special Term dismissing the action for failure to prosecute; also appeal from certain parts of an order of Erie Special Term denying motion of plaintiff to vacate above order of Fisher, J.) Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Goldman and Noonan, JJ.
### §6310. Suspension or termination of orders

The Secretary shall, whenever the Secretary finds that the order or any provision of the order obstructs or does not tend to effectuate the declared policy of this chapter, terminate or suspend the operation of such order or provision. The termination or suspension of any order, or any provision thereof, shall not be considered an order within the meaning of this chapter.

(Pub. L. 101–624, title XIX, §1975, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 3904.)
No. 692.

#### Cheatham Electric Switching Device Company *v.*Transit Development Company et al.

*568Appeal from the District Court c>f the United States for the Eastern District of New York.

Motion to dismiss or affirm submitted March 1, 1920.

Decided March 8, 1920.

*Mr. Albert M. Austin*for appellant.

*Mr. Thomas J. Johnston*for appellees.

*Per Curiam.*

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of *Aspen Mining & Smelting Co.*v. *Billings,*150 U. S. 31, 37; *Brown*v. *Alton Water Co.,*222 U. S. 325, 332-334; *Metropolitan Water Co.*v. *Kaw Valley District,*223 U. S. 519, 522; *Shapiro*v. *United States,*235 U. S. 412, 416. And see *Red Jacket, Jr., Coal Co.*v. *United Thacker Coal Co.,*248 U. S. 531.