alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER AND

N OTICE OF I NTENT TO D ISMISS

Appellate case name: Gary T. Bohnert v. P ort folio Recovery Associates, LLC

Appellate case number: 01

- 1 4

- 00 043

- CV

Trial court case number: 1 0 2 7 830

Trial court: County Civil Court at Law No. 2 of Harris County

On June 5 , 2014, appellant, Gary T. Bohnert, representing that the parties have

reached a settlement that has “been consummated by tender and receipt to the agreed

- to settlement amount,” filed a motion to vacate the trial court ’s judgment without regard to the merits and close the appeal

. The motion is not signed by appellee’s counsel and does not otherwise reflect “an agreement signed by the parties or their attorneys” to vacate the

trial cour t judgment and dismiss the appeal

. See T EX

. R. A PP . P. 42.1 (a)(2); see also T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 10.1(a)(5) (requiring certificate of conference)

. Accordingly, we deny the

motion.

However, t he existence of an actual controversy is essential to the exercise of

a ppellate jurisdiction. See, e.g.

, Valley Baptist Med. Ctr. v. Gonzales , 33 S.W.3d 821, 822 (Tex. 2000). Based on appellant’s motion , it appears to the Court that it no longer has jurisdiction over this appeal.

Accordingly, unless the parties to this appeal demonstrate, within 1 4 days of the

date of this order and notice, that there is a live controversy between them as to the merits of this appeal, the appeal may be dismissed. See T EX

. R. A PP . P. 42.3(a).

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Jim Sharp

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: July 24, 2014
### §8502. Sense of Congress regarding need for improved and better coordinated Federal policy for brown tree snake introduction, control, and eradication

It is the sense of Congress that there exists a need for improved and better coordinated control, interdiction, research, and eradication of the brown tree snake on the part of the United States and other interested parties.

(Pub. L. 108–384, §3, Oct. 30, 2004, 118 Stat. 2222.)
### §1536. Custody and release pending removal hearing

#### (a) Upon filing application

#### (1) In general

Subject to paragraphs (2) and (3), the Attorney General may—

(A) take into custody any alien with respect to whom an application under section 1533 of this title has been filed; and

(B) retain such an alien in custody in accordance with the procedures authorized by this subchapter.

#### (2) Special rules for permanent resident aliens

#### (A) Release hearing

An alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence shall be entitled to a release hearing before the judge assigned to hear the removal hearing. Such an alien shall be detained pending the removal hearing, unless the alien demonstrates to the court that the alien—

(i) is a person lawfully admitted for permanent residence in the United States;

(ii) if released upon such terms and conditions as the court may prescribe (including the posting of any monetary amount), is not likely to flee; and

(iii) will not endanger national security, or the safety of any person or the community, if released.

#### (B) Information considered

The judge may consider classified information submitted in camera and ex parte in making a determination whether to release an alien pending the removal hearing.

#### (3) Release if order denied and no review sought

#### (A) In general

Subject to subparagraph (B), if a judge of the removal court denies the order sought in an application filed pursuant to section 1533 of this title, and the Attorney General does not seek review of such denial, the alien shall be released from custody.

#### (B) Application of regular procedures

Subparagraph (A) shall not prevent the arrest and detention of the alien pursuant to subchapter II.

#### (b) Conditional release if order denied and review sought

#### (1) In general

If a judge of the removal court denies the order sought in an application filed pursuant to section 1533 of this title and the Attorney General seeks review of such denial, the judge shall release the alien from custody subject to the least restrictive condition, or combination of conditions, of release described in section 3142(b) and clauses (i) through (xiv) of section 3142(c)(1)(B) of title 18 that—

(A) will reasonably assure the appearance of the alien at any future proceeding pursuant to this subchapter; and

(B) will not endanger the safety of any other person or the community.

#### (2) No release for certain aliens

If the judge finds no such condition or combination of conditions, as described in paragraph (1), the alien shall remain in custody until the completion of any appeal authorized by this subchapter.

(June 27, 1952, ch. 477, title V, §506, as added Pub. L. 104–132, title IV, §401(a), Apr. 24, 1996, 110 Stat. 1265.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Abolition of Immigration and Naturalization Service and Transfer of Functions

For abolition of Immigration and Naturalization Service, transfer of functions, and treatment of related references, see note set out under section 1551 of this title.
### §2372. Payment of plant variety protection fees; return of excess amounts

All fees shall be paid to the Secretary, and the Secretary may refund any sum paid by mistake or in excess of the fee required.

(Pub. L. 91–577, title I, §32, Dec. 24, 1970, 84 Stat. 1545.)
1424.203 Policy. ( a ) The Department's implementation of the Freedom of Information Act is codified in regulations under 43 CFR part 2, subparts A and B.
( b ) It is the policy of the Department to alert prospective contractors which place restrictions on the disclosure and use of proposal data that certain data may be subject to disclosure under a Freedom of Information Act request. (*See* 1415.207 and 1452.215-71.)
### §7423. Effect on other laws

This subchapter shall not affect or preempt any other Federal or State law authorizing promotion or research relating to an agricultural commodity.

(Pub. L. 104–127, title V, §524, Apr. 4, 1996, 110 Stat. 1047.)
### §6941a. Coordinator for Chronically Underserved Rural Areas

#### (a) Establishment

The Secretary of Agriculture shall establish a Coordinator for Chronically Underserved Rural Areas (in this section referred to as the "Coordinator"), to be located in the Rural Development Mission Area.

#### (b) Mission

The mission of the Coordinator shall be to direct Department of Agriculture resources to high need, high poverty rural areas.

#### (c) Duties

The Coordinator shall consult with other offices in directing technical assistance, strategic regional planning, at the State and local level, for developing rural economic development that leverages the resources of State and local governments and non-profit and community development organizations.

#### (d) Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary such sums as necessary to carry out this section for fiscal years 2008 through 2012.

(Pub. L. 110–234, title XIV, §14218, May 22, 2008, 122 Stat. 1482; Pub. L. 110–246, §4(a), title XIV, §14218, June 18, 2008, 122 Stat. 1664, 2244.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Pub. L. 110–234 and Pub. L. 110–246 enacted identical sections. Pub. L. 110–234 was repealed by section 4(a) of Pub. L. 110–246.

Section was enacted as part of the Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008, and not as part of the Department of Agriculture Reorganization Act of 1994, which in part comprises this chapter.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Enactment of this section and repeal of Pub. L. 110–234 by Pub. L. 110–246 effective May 22, 2008, the date of enactment of Pub. L. 110–234, see section 4 of Pub. L. 110–246, set out as a note under section 8701 of this title.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1994
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1994
<CASH>                                           1,852
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  277,835
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     28,395
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               308,082
<PP&E>                                       1,682,744
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,611,642)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 765,401
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          868,261
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       994,655
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,153,790)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   765,401
<SALES>                                      1,246,294
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,291,294
<CGS>                                          815,876
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,411,904
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (120,610)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (120,610)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              (144,055)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (264,665)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.26)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.26)
        

</TABLE>
### §31145. Coordination of Governmental activities and paperwork

The Secretary of Transportation shall coordinate the activities of departments, agencies, and instrumentalities of the United States Government to ensure adequate protection of the safety and health of operators of commercial motor vehicles. The Secretary shall attempt to minimize paperwork burdens to ensure maximum coordination and to avoid overlap and the imposition of unreasonable burdens on persons subject to regulations under this subchapter.

(Pub. L. 103–272, §1(e), July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 1012.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 31145 | 49 App.:2517(b). | Oct. 30, 1984, Pub. L. 98–554, §220(b), 98 Stat. 2846. |

Section
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 610 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 610

  To promote transparency by permitting the Public Company Accounting 
Oversight Board to allow its disciplinary proceedings to be open to the 
                    public, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 13, 2017

Mr. Reed (for himself and Mr. Grassley) introduced the following bill; 
which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, 
                           and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To promote transparency by permitting the Public Company Accounting 
Oversight Board to allow its disciplinary proceedings to be open to the 
                    public, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``PCAOB Enforcement Transparency Act 
of 2017''.

SEC. 2. OPEN MEETINGS AUTHORIZED.

    Section 105(c)(2) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (15 U.S.C. 
7215(c)(2)) is amended to read as follows:
            ``(2) Public hearings.--Hearings under this section shall 
        be open to the public, unless the Board, on its own motion or 
        after considering the motion of a party, orders otherwise.''.

SEC. 3. PUBLICATION OF DETERMINATIONS.

    Section 105(d)(1)(C) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (15 U.S.C. 
7215(d)(1)(C)) is amended by striking ``(once any stay on the 
imposition of such sanction has been lifted)''.
                                 <all>
```
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22

- 6023

ALONZA DENNIS , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. CHARLES WILLIAMS, Warden PCI; BRYAN P. STIRLING, SCDC Director; HENRY DARGAN MCMASTER , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Greenville

. Joseph Dawson, III , District Judge. ( 6:21

- cv - 00964

- JD )

Submitted : November 22, 2022 Decided: November 28, 2022

Before HARRIS and RICHARDSON , Circuit Judges , and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Alonza Dennis, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 22-6023 Doc: 15 Filed: 11/28/2022 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM:
Alonza Dennis appeals the dist rict court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing Dennis’ 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action with prejudice under
28 U.S.C. § § 1915(e)(2)(B) , 1915 A

. Confining our review to the issues raised in the informal brief, see 4th Cir. R. 34(b) ; Jackson v. Lightsey , 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues preser ved in that brief.”) , w e have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court ’s judgment

. Dennis v. Williams , No. 6:21

- cv - 00964

- JD (D.S.C. Dec. 8, 2021) . We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and le gal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED USCA4 Appeal: 22-6023 Doc: 15 Filed: 11/28/2022 Pg: 2 of 2
#### 1422.1003 Applicability.
#### § 809a.3 Unauthorized entry.

Under Section 21 of the Internal Security Act of 1950 (50 U.S.C. 797), any directive issued by the commander of a military installation or facility, which includes the parameters for authorized entry to or exit from a military installation, is legally enforceable against all persons whether or not those persons are subject to the Uniformed Code of Military Justice (UCMJ). Military personnel who reenter an installation after having been properly ordered not to do so may be apprehended. Civilian violators may be detained and either escorted off the installation or turned over to proper civilian authorities. Civilian violators may be prosecuted under 18 U.S.C. 1382.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v.

JOSE LUIS MANZO, AKA Jose Manzo,

Defendant

- Appellant. No s

. 19

- 30166

19

- 30168

D.C. No s . 2:07

- cr

- 02042

- LRS

- 2

2:07

- cr

- 02088

- LRS

- 1

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington Lonny R. Suko, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 4, 2020 * *

Before: FERNANDEZ, SILVERMAN, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.

In these consolidated appeals, Jose Luis Manzo appeals pro se from the

district court’s order denying his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582(c)(2). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S. C. § 1291, and we affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Nint h Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

FEB 11 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 19

- 30166 & 19

- 30168

Manzo contends that he is entitled to a sentence reduction under the safety

valve provision of the First Step Act of 2018. T he safety valve provision of the

First Step Act does not appear to be applicable to Manzo, whose criminal

convictions pre

- date the statute’s enactment. See First Step Act of 2018, Pub. L.

No. 115

- 391, § 402(b), 132 Stat. 5194, 5221 ( “ The amendment made by this

section shall apply only to a conviction e ntered on or after the date of enactment of

this Act.”)

. But even if it were, Manzo would not be entitled to safety valve relief

.

As the district court correctly concluded, the First Step Act’s changes to the safety

valve provision do not help Manzo because, at sentencing, Manzo was determined

to have six criminal history points, including one three

- point offense. See 18

U.S.C. § 3553(f)(1) (A)

- (B) (2019) (defendant is ineligible for safety valve relief if

he has more than four criminal history points or a prior three

- point offense).

Manzo’s motion to take judicial notice is granted.

AFFIRMED.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Federal Communications Commission 47 CFR Part 73
[MB Docket No. 20-155, RM-11856; DA 20-1522; FRS 17360]
 AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.
 ACTION: Final rule.
 SUMMARY: At the request of Georgia-Carolina Radiocasting Company, LLC, the Audio Division amends the FM Table of Allotments, by Channel 238A at Edgefield, South Carolina, as a first local service. A staff engineering analysis indicates that Channel 238A can be allotted to Edgefield, South Carolina, consistent with the minimum distance separation requirements of the Commission's rules, using city reference coordinates. The reference coordinates are 33-48-53 NL 81-56-10 WL.
 DATES: Effective February 24, 2021.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rolanda F. Smith, Media Bureau, (202) 418-2700.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's Report and Order, MB Docket No. 20-155, adopted December 21, 2020, and released December 23, 2020. The full text of this Commission decision is available online at 
                    *http://apps.fcc.gov/​ecfs/​.*
                     This document does not contain information collection requirements subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13. The Commission will send a copy of the 
                    *Report and Order*
                     in a report to be sent to Congress and the Government Accountability Office pursuant to the Congressional Review Act, 
                    *see*5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A). List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73 Radio
Radio broadcasting
 Federal Communications Commission. Nazifa Sawez, Assistant Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau.
 Editorial Note: This document was received for publication at the Office of the Federal Register on January 4, 2021.
 For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Federal Communications Commission amends 47 CFR part 73 as follows: PART 73—RADIO BROADCAST SERVICES
 1.The authority citation for part 73 continues to read as follows: Authority:
                        47 U.S.C. 154, 155, 301, 303, 307, 309, 310, 334, 336, 339. 2.In § 73.202, the table in paragraph (b) is amended under South Carolina by adding an entry for “Edgefield” to read as follows: § 73.202
  
 (b) * * * Table 1 to Paragraph 
                                (b)
[U.S. States]
Channel No.*    *    *    *    ***South Carolina**Edgefield
238A*    *    *    *    *


[FR Doc. 2021-00081 Filed 2-23-21; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
Appeal No. 74-288.

#### Pilgrim Land Developers, Inc. *v.*Anthony L. Santilli *et al.*

*Edward, L. Maggiacomo,*for plaintiffappellee. *John S. Brunero,*Town Solicitor, for defendants-appellants.

The plaintiff-appellee’s motion to affirm the judgment of the Superior Court under Rule 16(g), as amended, is denied.
Exhibit 32.2
 SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION*
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
  /s/ Tod P. SpornhauerTod P. SpornhauerChief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer) 
 *
    
    This certification is being furnished as required by Rule 13a-14(b) under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the
United States Code, and shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the
Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liability of that Section. This certification
shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities
Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act, except as otherwise stated in such filing.