alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Our Mission 

The U.S. Department of Education’s mission is to promote student 

achievement and preparation for global competitiveness by fostering 

educational excellence and ensuring equal access.

FY 2016 Annual Performance Report and FY 2018 Annual Performance Plan—U.S. Department of Education 2 

Mission and Organizational Structure

Who We Are. In 1867, the federal government recognized that furthering education was a 

national priority and created a federal education agency to collect and report statistical data. 

The Department was established as a cabinet-level agency in 1980. Today, the Department 

supports programs in every area and level of education. 

Our Public Benefit. While recognizing the primary role of states and school districts in 

providing a high-quality education, the Department is committed to helping ensure that students 

throughout the nation develop skills to succeed in school, college, and the workforce. The 

Department supports efforts to help students succeed regardless of background or 

circumstance by encouraging challenging content, setting high expectations for all students, and 

monitoring academic progress. 

The Department’s largest fiscal responsibility is a portfolio of student loans (see the Financial 

Highlights and Notes sections of the Agency Financial Report [AFR]). The second-largest fiscal 

responsibility is grants to states, mostly for elementary and secondary education, awarded 

based on both statutory formulas (see the chart on page 6 of the AFR) and competitions. The 

third largest fiscal responsibility is student aid to help pay for college through Pell Grants, Work 

Study, and other campus-based programs (see the Notes section of the AFR). 

The Department also supports research, collects education statistics, enforces civil rights 

statutes, and carries out competitive grant programs to promote innovation (see The 

Department’s Approach to Performance Management section).
MISSION AND ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE

FY 2016 Annual Performance Report and FY 2018 Annual Performance Plan—U.S. Department of Education 3 

Our Organization in Fiscal Year 2016 

This chart reflects the coordinating structure of the U.S. Department of Education in FY 2016.
### The Conterminous United States Mineral Assessment Project; background information to accompany folio of geologic, geochemical, geophysical, and mineral resources maps of the Reno 1 by 2 degree Quadrangle, Nevada and California

By: David John**John H. StewartJ. D. HendricksL. C. RowanDonald Plouff

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/cir1078

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
```

                      Electro Rent Corporation
                            FORM 10-Q
                         November 30, 2002

                          Exhibit Index

Exhibit #   Description
---------   -----------
99.1        Statement Pursuant to Section 906 the Sarbanes-Oxley
            Act of 2002 By Principal Executive Officer Regarding
            Facts and Circumstances Relating to Exchange Act
            Filings

99.2        Statement Pursuant to Section 906 the Sarbanes-Oxley
            Act of 2002 By Principal Financial Officer Regarding
            Facts and Circumstances Relating to Exchange Act
            Filings

99.1

Statement Pursuant to Section 906 the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
By Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
Regarding Facts and Circumstances Relating to Exchange Act
Filings

Dated December 18, 2002

I, Daniel Greenberg, certify that the periodic report, to which
this Statement is attached, fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of
1934, and the information contained in the periodic report to
which this Statement is attached, fairly present, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the registrant.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Statement
as of the date first written above.

/s/ Daniel Greenberg
Daniel Greenberg
Chief Executive Officer

99.2

Statement Pursuant to Section 906 the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
By Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
Regarding Facts and Circumstances Relating to Exchange Act
Filings

Dated December 18, 2002

I, Craig Jones, certify that the periodic report, to which this
Statement is attached, fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of
1934, and the information contained in the periodic report to
which this Statement is attached, fairly present, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the registrant.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Statement
as of the date first written above.

/s/Craig Jones
Craig Jones
Chief Financial Officer
```
#### MADIGAN, Appellant, v. THIRD AVE. R. CO., Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

February 6, 1903.)

Action by Daniel Madigan against the Third Avenue Railroad Company. G. W. Bristol, for appellant. A. C. Ormsbee, for respondent.

No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs, on the •opinion in 68 App. Div. 123, 74 N. Y. Supp. 143.
#### 1430.202-2 Impracticality of submission.

The CO shall prepare any request to award a contract without the required contractor submission of the Form No. CASB-DS-1, Disclosure Statement, and submit it through the HCA, to the Director, PAM, and to the Secretary for approval. The Secretary, without the power of redelegation, must file a report to CASB within 30 days in accordance with 48 CFR 9903.202-2 (FAR Appendix).
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 11-2211

___________ Joanne Burrow, * * Appellant, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Eastern v. * District of Missouri. * Boeing Company, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: April 4, 2012 Filed: April 9, 2012

___________ Before BYE, COLLOTON, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Joanne Burrow appeals the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment in her employment-discrimination action. Having conducted denovo review of the record, see Wierman v. Casey’s Gen. Stores , 638 F.3d 984, 993 (8th Cir. 2011), and having carefully considered Burrow’s argum ents for reversal, we agree with the district court that Burrow failed to create any trialworthy issues on whether her race

1 The Honorable Thomas C. Mummert, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).was a contributing factor in the adverse employment actions, as required for a claim under the Missouri Human Rights Act (MHRA), see EEOC v. Con-Way Freight, Inc. , 622 F.3d 933, 938 (8th Cir. 2010) (under MHRA plaintiff need only prove that race was contributing factor in employment decision; Missouri courts have defined contributing factor as one that contributed share in anything or has part in producing effect). 2The district court is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

2 We do not address the claims Bu rrow has abandoned on appeal. See Griffith v. City of Des Moines , 387 F.3d 733, 739 (8th Cir. 2004). -2-
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ralik Allah, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County, entered May 11, 1977, convicting defendant of two counts of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree and sentencing him as a second felony offender to two concurrent terms of *3Vi*to 7 years is unanimously modified, on the law, and the matter is remanded for resentence following a new predicate felony hearing, and otherwise the judgment is affirmed. Defendant was sentenced as a second felony offender after a hearing occasioned by his denial that he was the person involved in a prior conviction. Under CPL 400.21 (subd 7) the burden of proof is on the People who must prove by admissible evidence that the defendant is, beyond a reasonable doubt, the person referred to in the arrest record. The prosecution introduced an arrest record (NYSIIS sheet) which indicated a conviction for rape, second degree, by a Gerald Cooper Alston. At trial, testimony of defendant’s wife showed that he had changed his name for religious reasons although she made no reference to first or middle names to establish that defendant was the person referred to by NYSIIS. We note that defendant’s wife spells her name with two "Is” compared to the one "1” used on the arrest record. The prosecutor was allowed to testify as to the wife’s trial testimony without complying with the requirements of CPL 670.10 or 670.20 which spell out authority and procedure for use of testimony given in a previous criminal proceeding. Such testimony without such compliance is hearsay and thus inadmissible. Likewise, the uncertified NYSIIS arrest record containing matter culled from other records even though based upon Social Security number and other social data and even though kept in the regular course of business, does not suffice to connect the defendant, beyond a reasonable doubt, to the prior felony conviction. A more accurate method of determining the identity of the defendant and proof beyond a reasonable doubt would be by a comparison of the fingerprints taken in the instant case with those taken from the said Gerald Alston in the rape conviction or by mug shots or direct testimony establishing appellant’s identity with the prior felon. Defendant raises other questions not preserved for appeal by objection and reasons that such objection would have necessitated "curative” language on the part of the trial court which could only serve to emphasize the prosecutor’s comments. No comment is necessary. Concur—Lupiano, J. P., Evans, Markewich and Yesawich, JJ.
#### The People of the State of New York v. Henry M. Lucasik.

Motion for leave to appeal as a poor person denied. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, Valente and McNally, JJ.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

THE SECRETARY

MEMORANDUM

TO: The General Counsel

FROM: The Secretary

SUBJECT: Delegation of Authority

I. DELEGATION

I hereby designate you Department Claims Officer, and in accordance with Section 

412 of the Department of Education Organization Act, Pub. L. 96-88, delegate to 

you authority to perform the functions vested in me by the following statutes:

1. The Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. 2671 et seq.;

2. The Military Personnel and Civilian Employees' Claims Act of 1964, 31 

U.S.C. 3701, 3721;

3. 5 U.S.C. 5584, authorizing waiver of claims arising out of erroneous payment 

of pay to employees of the Department.

4. 31 U.S.C. 3702, governing the settlement of claims.

In carrying out the delegated authority, you are authorized to perform all necessary 

administrative functions, including the issuance of procedures and instructions for 

the handling of claims under these statutes and regulations promulgated thereunder.

II. RESERVATIONS

Unless otherwise noted, the following are not delegated: 

1. The authority to promulgate regulations;

2. The authority to compromise, terminate or suspend collection action on claims 

under the Federal Claims Collection Act of 1966 as amended, 31 U.S.C. 7511, 

et seq.;

3. The authority to award contracts or discretionary grants; and
Page 2 - The General Counsel

4. Unless otherwise provided by law, the authority to submit reports to Congress 

or the President;

III. REDELEGATION

Subject to the reservations contained herein, you may:

1. Redelegate any of the authority delegated to you; and

2. Authorize further redelegation. 

IV. CERTIFICATION AND EFFECTIVE DATE

This delegation is effective upon certification by the Department's Principal 

Delegation Control Officer and supersedes the previous delegation of this authority, 

Delegation Control No. EA/EG/13, certified on July 26, 1983.

 /s/ 

Lauro F. Cavazos

OGC Clearance and Date: /s/ Jeffrey Morhardt, 4/12/89

Certified Date: 4/26/1989

Departmental Delegations Control Officer: Ruby T. Tynes

Control Number: EA/EG/40
§ 553.29 Permission to construct private headstones and markers. ( a ) Headstone firms must receive permission from the Executive Director to construct a private headstone or marker for use in Army National Military Cemeteries or to add an inscription to an existing headstone or marker in an Army National Military Cemetery.
( b ) Requests for permission must be submitted to the Executive Director and must include: ( 1 ) Written consent from the personal representative or primary next of kin;
( 2 ) Contact information for both the personal representative or primary next of kin and the headstone firm; and
( 3 ) A scale drawing (no less than 1:12) showing all dimensions, or a reproduction showing detailed specifications of design and proposed construction material, finishing, carving, lettering, exact inscription to appear on the headstone or marker, and a trademark or copyright designation.
( c ) The Army does not endorse headstone firms but grants permission for the construction of headstones or markers in individual cases.
( d ) When using sandblast equipment to add an inscription to an existing headstone or marker, headstone firms shall restore the surrounding grounds in a timely manner as determined by the Executive Director to the condition of the grounds before work began and at no expense to the Government.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF JUNE 30, 2000 AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF
OPERATIONS FOR SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000034296
<NAME>                        Fairmount Chemical Co., Inc.

<S>                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                     DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                  2,020,200
<SECURITIES>                                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                           2,972,500
<ALLOWANCES>                                    0
<INVENTORY>                             2,708,200
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        7,785,100
<PP&E>                                  9,665,000
<DEPRECIATION>                          5,534,400
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         11,916,400
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   2,489,100
<BONDS>                                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           0
<PREFERRED>                             5,400,000
<COMMON>                                8,293,400
<OTHER-SE>                             (5,868,500)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           11,916,400
<SALES>                                 6,534,500
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        6,534,500
<CGS>                                   5,101,400
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           5,101,400
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                         (377,200)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         88,900
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 0
<INCOME-TAX>                                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       487,900
<DISCONTINUED>                                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 0
<CHANGES>                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                              487,900
<EPS-BASIC>                                  0.06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                0.03


</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.31 




O’Sullivan
Industries Holdings, Inc.,
and
 O’Sullivan Industries,
Inc.





Compensation for
Directors 



        Each
director of O’Sullivan Industries Holdings, Inc. and O’Sullivan Industries, Inc.
not employed by O’Sullivan Industries, Inc. receives as compensation for his or her
service: 



             1.       
          a stipend of $30,000 per year; 



             2.       
          a fee of $2,000 per meeting (other than a regular quarterly meeting of the Board
          or a Committee meeting held on the same day as a regular quarterly meeting of
          the Board) attended in person (with all meetings that occur on the same day
          being considered as one meeting); 



             3.       
          a fee of $1,000 per meeting attended by telephone conference (with all meetings
          that occur on the same day being considered as one meeting); and 



             4.       
          a one-time grant of options to purchase common stock of O’Sullivan
          Industries Holdings, Inc. in such amount and at such price as may be approved by
          the Board or an opportunity to purchase shares of O’Sullivan Industries
          Holdings, Inc. stock as approved by the Board. 



        All
directors are reimbursed for their expenses incurred in connection with their service on
the Board or any Committee thereof, including without limitation travel expenses incurred
in connection with meetings of the Board of Directors or any Committee thereof. 



        Members
of the Board who serve as Chairman of Committees of the Board receive additional
compensation as follows: 



             A.       
          the Chairman of the Audit Committee receives an annual stipend of $7,500; 



             B.       
          the Chairman of the Restructuring Committee receives an annual stipend of
          $10,000; 



             C.       
          the Chairman of the Nominating Committee receives an annual stipend of $5,000;
          and 



             D.       
          the Chairman of the Compensation Committee receives an annual stipend of $5,000. 



        The
Chairman of the Board of the Corporation receives a stipend of $5,000 per month.
### §9. Award of arbitrators; confirmation; jurisdiction; procedure

If the parties in their agreement have agreed that a judgment of the court shall be entered upon the award made pursuant to the arbitration, and shall specify the court, then at any time within one year after the award is made any party to the arbitration may apply to the court so specified for an order confirming the award, and thereupon the court must grant such an order unless the award is vacated, modified, or corrected as prescribed in sections 10 and 11 of this title. If no court is specified in the agreement of the parties, then such application may be made to the United States court in and for the district within which such award was made. Notice of the application shall be served upon the adverse party, and thereupon the court shall have jurisdiction of such party as though he had appeared generally in the proceeding. If the adverse party is a resident of the district within which the award was made, such service shall be made upon the adverse party or his attorney as prescribed by law for service of notice of motion in an action in the same court. If the adverse party shall be a nonresident, then the notice of the application shall be served by the marshal of any district within which the adverse party may be found in like manner as other process of the court.

(July 30, 1947, ch. 392, 61 Stat. 672.)

#### Derivation

Act Feb. 12, 1925, ch. 213, §9, 43 Stat. 885.
M. P. No. 74-294.

#### Leroy W. Armstrong *v.*Virginia D. Armstrong.

*James P. Flynn,*for petitioner. *Abedon, Michaelson, Stanzler & Biener, Milton Stanzler,*for respondent.

This is a petition for certiorari. Since the identical issues for which review by certiorari is presently being sought will be considered in due course on appeal, the petition for certiorari is denied.

A stay of certain mortgage foreclosure proceedings entered on November 1, 1974 is to be considered as having been properly filed pursuant to Rule 8 and the stay is to remain in full force and effect pending the determination of petitioner’s appeal. The respondent’s motion to vacate the stay is denied.