alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### George Lorber et al., Appellants, v. Benjamin L. Tell et al., Copartners Doing Business as Tell, Cheser, Werner & Breitbart, Respondents, et al., Defendants.

Order, entered on April 19, 1960, as limits the motion for partial judgment to $12,000 less the lawful interest of the City Treasurer; as leaves for the determination of the trial court the question of any shortage between the sum recovered from the City Treasurer and the $12,000 deposited by the defendants; and as fails to order the Clerk of the court to enter judgment in favor of the plaintiffs and against the defendants-respondents in the sum of $12,000, unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondents. No opinion. Concur — Botein, P. J., Rabin, Valente, McNally and Stevens, JJ.
### §1572. Definitions

In this subchapter:

#### (1) Backlog

The term "backlog" means, with respect to an immigration benefit application, the period of time in excess of 180 days that such application has been pending before the Immigration and Naturalization Service.

#### (2) Immigration benefit application

The term "immigration benefit application" means any application or petition to confer, certify, change, adjust, or extend any status granted under the Immigration and Nationality Act [8 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.].

(Pub. L. 106–313, title II, §203, Oct. 17, 2000, 114 Stat. 1263.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Immigration and Nationality Act, referred to in par. (2), is act June 27, 1952, ch. 477, 66 Stat. 163, which is classified principally to chapter 12 (§1101 et seq.) of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1101 of this title and Tables.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Abolition of Immigration and Naturalization Service and Transfer of Functions

For abolition of Immigration and Naturalization Service, transfer of functions, and treatment of related references, see note set out under section 1551 of this title.
#### The People of the State of New York v. Carl Edelson.

Motion for leave to appeal as a poor person granted to the extent and on the terms and conditions contained in the order of this court entered herein. Miss Prances Kahn of 401 Broadway, New York, New York is assigned as counsel for the appellant for the purposes of this appeal. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, Valente, McNally and Bastow, JJ.
Exhibit 31.1**Certification****Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes — Oxley Act of 2002**I, Adrian Ma, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Emerson Radio Corp.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;andc) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors andthe audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;andb) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date: February 14, 2008 /s/  Adrian Ma   Adrian Ma   Chief Executive Officer   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 302 has been provided to EmersonRadio Corp. and will be retained by Emerson Radio Corp. and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.
23
### §309. Land grants in the State of North Dakota

#### (a) Expenses

Notwithstanding section 303 of this title, the State of North Dakota shall manage the land granted to the State under section 301 of this title, including any proceeds from the land, in accordance with this section.

#### (b) Disposition of proceeds

Notwithstanding section 304 of this title, the State of North Dakota shall, with respect to any trust fund in which proceeds from the sale of land under this subchapter are deposited (referred to in this section as the "trust fund")—

(1) deposit all revenues earned by a trust fund into the trust fund;

(2) deduct the costs of administering a trust fund from each trust fund; and

(3) manage each trust fund to—

(A) preserve the purchasing power of the trust fund; and

(B) maintain stable distributions to trust fund beneficiaries.

#### (c) Distributions

Notwithstanding section 304 of this title, any distributions from trust funds in the State of North Dakota shall be made in accordance with section 2 of article IX of the Constitution of the State of North Dakota.

#### (d) Management

Notwithstanding section 305 of this title, the State of North Dakota shall manage the land granted under section 301 of this title, including any proceeds from the land, in accordance with this section.

(July 2, 1862, ch. 130, §9, as added Pub. L. 111–11, title XIII, §13001(b), Mar. 30, 2009, 123 Stat. 1446.)
-       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2024-09-11T15:20:58-0400
      - Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401
      - Government Publishing Office
      - Government Publishing Office attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by Government Publishing Office
### §1555. Immigration Service expenses

Appropriations now or hereafter provided for the Immigration and Naturalization Service shall be available for payment of (a) hire of privately owned horses for use on official business, under contract with officers or employees of the Service; (b) pay of interpreters and translators who are not citizens of the United States; (c) distribution of citizenship textbooks to aliens without cost to such aliens; (d) payment of allowances (at such rate as may be specified from time to time in the appropriation Act involved) to aliens, while held in custody under the immigration laws, for work performed; and (e) when so specified in the appropriation concerned, expenses of unforeseen emergencies of a confidential character, to be expended under the direction of the Attorney General, who shall make a certificate of the amount of any such expenditure as he may think it advisable not to specify, and every such certificate shall be deemed a sufficient voucher for the sum therein expressed to have been expended.

(July 28, 1950, ch. 503, §6, 64 Stat. 380.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 341d of Title 5 prior to the general revision and enactment of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees, by Pub. L. 89–554, §1, Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 378.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Abolition of Immigration and Naturalization Service and Transfer of Functions

For abolition of Immigration and Naturalization Service, transfer of functions, and treatment of related references, see note set out under section 1551 of this title.
#### 1509.505-4 Obtaining access to proprietary information.

Contractors gaining access to confidential business information of other companies in performing advisory services for EPA shall comply with the special requirements of 40 CFR part 2 and the provisions of their contracts relating to the treatment of confidential business information.
Case: 1:12-cv-01446 Document #: 34 Filed: 07/13/12 Page 1 of 9 PageID #:138
Case: 1:12-cv-01446 Document #: 34 Filed: 07/13/12 Page 2 of 9 PageID #:139
Case: 1:12-cv-01446 Document #: 34 Filed: 07/13/12 Page 3 of 9 PageID #:140
Case: 1:12-cv-01446 Document #: 34 Filed: 07/13/12 Page 4 of 9 PageID #:141
Case: 1:12-cv-01446 Document #: 34 Filed: 07/13/12 Page 5 of 9 PageID #:142
Case: 1:12-cv-01446 Document #: 34 Filed: 07/13/12 Page 6 of 9 PageID #:143
Case: 1:12-cv-01446 Document #: 34 Filed: 07/13/12 Page 7 of 9 PageID #:144
Case: 1:12-cv-01446 Document #: 34 Filed: 07/13/12 Page 8 of 9 PageID #:145
Case: 1:12-cv-01446 Document #: 34 Filed: 07/13/12 Page 9 of 9 PageID #:146
Fiscal Year 2019 Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies - HAWAII

No data No data No data

LEA ID District FY 2019 Title I Allocation

1500001 Hawaii County 12,880,812

1500003 Honolulu County 31,041,752

1500005 Kalawao County 0

1500007 Kauai County 2,004,341

1500009 Maui County 5,302,660

1599999 PART D SUBPART 2 0

No data No data No data

* Actual amounts received by LEAs will be smaller than shown here due to State-level adjustments to Federal Title I allocations. States adjust

 allocations, for example, to reflect LEA boundary changes or the creation of new LEAs, including charter school LEAs, that are not accounted

 for in the statutory calculations. States also are permitted to reserve, for administration, up to 1 percent of the allocations they would receive

 if $14 billion were appropriated and generally must reserve 7 percent of their allocations for school improvement. These 

 adjustments will reduce the actual amounts available.

X0AT
Exhibit 32.1
       Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
            Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
                           Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with this quarterly report of Espey Mfg. & Electronics Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Howard Pinsley,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

1.   The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in this report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: October 29, 2003


                                              /s/Howard Pinsley
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              Howard Pinsley
                                              President and
                                              Chief Executive Officer




                                       13
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Herbert Henry Parks, Appellant. The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Stewart Hill Parks, Appellant.

Consolidated appeals by defendants from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County, rendered May 26, 1961 after a jury trial, convicting each of them of robbery, first degree (two counts); grand larceny, first degree (two counts); and assault, second degree (two counts); and sentencing them to serve concurrent prison terms as follows: 10 to 20 years on each robbery count; 5 to 10 years on each larceny count; and 2% to 5 years on each assault count. Judgment as to each defendant, affirmed. We do not pass upon the alleged claim now made that the prosecution perpetrated a fraud upon the court in not disclosing a promise or understanding respecting the treatment accorded or to be accorded to an accomplice witness here who was resentenced folio-wing the conviction of the defendants. We do not pass upon the claim because it is not supported by proof in the record; it is supported only by statements made in defendants’ briefs — statements dehors the record. Beldock, P. J., Kleinfeld, Brennan, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
No. 8012.

#### Bode *v.*Keck et al.

(Decided November 10, 1903.)

Error to Circuit Court of Hamilton county.

*Messrs. Goebel & Bettinger,*for plaintiff in error.

*Messrs. Jones & James,*for defendants in error.

Judgment of the circuit court reversed and judg' ment of the court of common pleas affirmed.

Spear, Davis, Shauck and Price, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 9 (Thursday, January 14, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 3227]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-00618]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 11306]


Review of the Designation as a Foreign Terrorist Organization of 
Palestinian Islamic Jihad (and Other Aliases)

    Based upon a review of the Administrative Record assembled pursuant 
to Section 219(a)(4)(C) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, as 
amended (8 U.S.C. 1189(a)(4)(C)) (``INA''), and in consultation with 
the Attorney General and the Secretary of the Treasury, I conclude that 
the circumstances that were the basis for the designation of the 
aforementioned organization as a Foreign Terrorist Organization have 
not changed in such a manner as to warrant revocation of the 
designation and that the national security of the United States does 
not warrant a revocation of the designation.
    Therefore, I hereby determine that the designation of the 
aforementioned organization as a Foreign Terrorist Organization, 
pursuant to Section 219 of the INA (8 U.S.C. 1189), shall be 
maintained.
    This notice shall be published in the Federal Register.

    Dated: December 22, 2020.
Michael R. Pompeo,
Secretary of State.
[FR Doc. 2021-00618 Filed 1-13-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-AD-P
#### 1512.101 Unenforceability of unauthorized obligations.

EPA deviates from FAR 52.212-4 by using the term *Commercial Supplier Agreements* (defined in 1502.100) for commercial contracts instead of *supplier license agreements*. Paragraph (u) of clause 1552.332-39 (FAR DEVIATION) prevents violations of the *Anti-Deficiency Act* (31 U.S.C. 1341) for the acquisition of supplies or services subject to a Commercial Supplier Agreement.
#### 13.305-1 General.

Imprest funds and third party drafts may be used to acquire and to pay for supplies or services. Policies and regulations concerning the establishment of and accounting for imprest funds and third party drafts, including the responsibilities of designated cashiers and alternates, are contained in Part IV of the Treasury Financial Manual for Guidance of Departments and Agencies, Title 7 of the GAO Policy and Procedures Manual for Guidance of Federal Agencies, and the agency implementing regulations. Agencies also shall be guided by the Manual of Procedures and Instructions for Cashiers, issued by the Financial Management Service, Department of the Treasury.

[62 FR 64917, Dec. 9, 1997, as amended at 71 FR 57380, Sept. 28, 2006]
#### 1432.501 General.
TS120961 Attachment 2 - Sanitized
#### DUMOWITH v. MARKS.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.

November 6, 1903.)

1. Attorneys—Enforcing Lien for Fees—Practice.

Code Civ. Proc. § 66, providing that the court, on petition of the client or attorney, may determine and enforce the attorney’s lien, provides a practice only as between attorney and client, and not for enforcing the claim of plaintiff’s attorney for fees against defendant, who has settled with plaintiff.

2. Same—Enforcement against Defendant—Insolvency of Plaintiff.

Plaintiff’s attorney, to enforce his claim for fees against defendant, who has settled with plaintiff, must show that plaintiff is insolvent.

Appeal from City Court of New York, Special Term.

Action by Aelig Dumowith against Cristania Marks. From order entered therein, and from a judgment for Charles Rosenthal, plaintiff’s attorney, against defendant, for his fees, defendant appeals. Reversed.

Argued before FREEDMAN, P. J., and BISCHOFF and BLANCHARD, JJ.

*454Butler, Notman, Joline & Mynderse, for appellant.

C. S. Rosenthal, for respondent.

BLANCHARD, J.

The proceedings taken by the plaintiff’s attorney, by virtue of the concluding clause of section 66 of the Code of Civil Procedure, to ascertain and enforce payment of his lien, are proper only between attorney and client. Rochfort v. Met. Street Ry. Co., 50 App. Div. 261, 63 N. Y. Supp. 1036. Nor does it appear that the plaintiff is insolvent. Youngv. Howell, 64 App. Div. 246, 72 N. Y. Supp. 5.

The judgment and order appealed from should be reversed, with costs. All concur.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Juan Antonio Tapia Ortiz, Appellant.

Judgment of the Supreme court, Kings County, rendered May 18, 1978, affirmed. No opinion. This case is remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (subd 5). Titone, J. P., Rabin, Gulotta and Cohalan, JJ., concur.
### Part B—Swine Packer Marketing Contracts

#### Termination of Part

For termination of part by section 942 of Pub. L. 106–78, see Livestock Mandatory Reporting note set out under section 1635 of this title.
11.701 Supply contracts. ( a ) A fixed-price supply contract may authorize Government acceptance of a variation in the quantity of items called for if the variation is caused by conditions of loading, shipping, or packing, or by allowances in manufacturing processes. Any permissible variation shall be stated as a percentage and it may be an increase, a decrease, or a combination of both; however, contracts for subsistence items may use other applicable terms of variation in quantity.
( b ) There should be no standard or usual variation percentage. The overrun or underrun permitted in each contract should be based upon the normal commercial practices of a particular industry for a particular item, and the permitted percentage should be no larger than is necessary to afford a contractor reasonable protection. The permissible variation shall not exceed plus or minus 10 percent unless a different limitation is established in agency regulations. Consideration shall be given to the quantity to which the percentage variation applies. For example, when delivery will be made to multiple destinations and it is desired that the quantity variation apply to the item quantity for each destination, this requirement must be stated in the contract.
( c ) Contractors are responsible for delivery of the specified quantity of items in a fixed-price contract, within allowable variations, if any. If a contractor delivers a quantity of items in excess of the contract requirements plus any allowable variation in quantity, particularly small dollar value overshipments, it results in unnecessary administrative costs to the Government in determining disposition of the excess quantity. Accordingly, the contract may include the clause at 52.211-17, Delivery of Excess Quantities, to provide that— ( 1 ) Excess quantities of items totaling up to $250 in value may be retained without compensating the contractor; and
( 2 ) Excess quantities of items totaling over $250 in value may, at the Government's option, be either returned at the contractor's expense or retained and paid for at the contract unit price.
[48 FR 42159, Sept. 19, 1983, as amended at 54 FR 34753, Aug. 21, 1989; 62 FR 40236, July 25, 1997]
#### Elizabeth Mayrant, as Administratrix of the Estate of Nemiah Mayrant, Deceased, Respondent, v. United Rental Corp., Appellant.

In an action to recover damages for the wrongful death of plaintiff’s intestate and for the decedent’s conscious pain and suffering, the defendant United Rental Equipment Co., Inc. (sued as “ United Rental Corp.”) appeals from a judgment of the Supreme. Court, Kings County, entered February 21, 1962 after trial upon a jury’s verdict in favor of the plaintiff for $124,000 on the cause-.of action for wrongful death and for $11,000 on the cause of action for conscious pain and suffering. Judgment reversed on the law and on the facts, and new trial granted, with costs to abide the event, unless, within 20 days after entry of the order hereon, the plaintiff shall stipulate to reduce to $75,000 the amount of the verdict on the cause of action for wrongful death and to reduce accordingly the amount of the interest and the total amount of the recovery as set forth in the judgment; in which event the judgment, as so reduced, is affirmed, without costs. In our opinion, the award of damages for the wrongful death was grossly excessive. Ughetla, Acting- P. J,, Kleinfeld, Christ, Brennan and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
#### In the Matter of the Probate of the Will of Barbara O. Hept, Deceased.

Motion granted on condition that records and briefs are filed and served on or before August 1, 1960 and on- the further condition that the appeal be argued at the September 1960 Term of court.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Esterline Technologies
Corporation (the "COMPANY") on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended January 28, 2005
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"FORM 10-Q/A"), I, Robert W. Cremin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Form 10-Q/A fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

      (2) The information contained in the Form 10-Q/A fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: January 6, 2006      By: /s/ Robert W. Cremin
                                -----------------------------------------------
                                               Robert W. Cremin
                                 Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer