alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME, CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET, AND CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS FOR THE FORM 10-K DATED DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000317187
<NAME> PENNSYLVANIA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                        6,905
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                        343
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                             716
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                         1,407
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   9,371
<COMMON>                                         1,476
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                           47
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                              1,094
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                   2,617
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              295
<PREFERRED>                                        171
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                             2,802
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                  10
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                       30
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                        166
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                    81
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                   3,199
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                    9,371
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                        2,910
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                               253
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                       2,101
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                       2,354
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                            556
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                  15
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                     571
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           214
<NET-INCOME>                                       357
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                         28
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                      329
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                             0
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                          207
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                             799
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 17

- 00228

- CV

ULLJA KUNTZE

, Appellant

v.

SANDRA COWAN

, Appellee

From the 335th District Court

Burleson County, Texas

Trial Court No. 26,129

ORDER ON MOTION FOR SANCTI ONS

Appellant Ullja Kuntze’s Motion for Sanctions, filed on July 28, 2017, is denied

PER CURIAM

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Motion denied

Order issued and filed January 3, 2018
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Joseph Silva, Appellant, v. Walter H. Wilkins, as Warden of Attica Prison, Respondent.

Order unanimously affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. Memorandum: The second count of the indictment herein charged defendant *737with feloniously possessing one eighth of an ounce of a substance containing 1% and more of the alkaloid heroin. Appellant plead guilty to an attempt to commit this crime and following other proceedures, here immaterial, was sentenced as a second felony offender to a term of not less than 9 nor more than 10 years. The crime charged in the second count, although not so denominated in the indictment, was obviously an alleged violation of subdivision 3 of section 1751 of the Penal Law. This subdivision (unlike subd. *2*of the same section) relates to possession or control in the absence of any proof of intent to sell. A violation of subdivision 3 provides a penalty of 3 to 10 years. Subdivision 5 of the same section provides that a conviction of an attempt to commit any of the crimes set forth in the section is punishable by a term of not less than half the minimum or more than half the maximum. Conviction of an attempt to commit the crime described in subdivision 3 would permit a sentence of not less than one and one half nor more than five years. Upon sentence of appellant as a second offender (Penal Law, § 1941) the permissible maximum sentence would have been not less than two and one-half years or more than 10 years. The sentence imposed (9 to 10 years) was within such permissible limits. (Appeal from order of Wyoming County Court dismissing, following a hearing, writ of habeas corpus and remanding relator to custody of Warden of Attica Prison.) Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Goldman, Henry and Del Vecehio, JJ.
### §6202. Definitions

As used in this chapter:

#### (1) Board

The term "Board" means the Lime Board provided for under section 6204(b) of this title.

#### (2) Consumer information

The term "consumer information" means any action taken to provide information to, and broaden the understanding of, the general public regarding the use, nutritional attributes, and care of limes.

#### (3) Handle

The term "handle" means to sell, purchase, or package limes.

#### (4) Handler

The term "handler" means any person in the business of handling limes.

#### (5) Importer

The term "importer" means any person who imports limes into the United States.

#### (6) Lime

The term "lime" means the fruit of a citrus latifolia tree for the fresh market.

#### (7) Marketing

The term "marketing" means the sale or other disposition of limes in commerce.

#### (8) Order

The term "order" means a lime research, promotion, and consumer information order issued by the Secretary under section 6203(a) of this title.

#### (9) Person

The term "person" means any individual, group of individuals, partnership, corporation, association, cooperative, or other legal entity.

#### (10) Producer

The term "producer" means any person who produces limes in the United States for sale in commerce.

#### (11) Producer-handler

The term "producer-handler" means any person who is both a producer and handler of limes.

#### (12) Promotion

The term "promotion" means any action taken under this chapter (including paid advertising) to present a favorable image for limes to the general public with the express intent of improving the competitive position and stimulating the sale of limes.

#### (13) Research

The term "research" means any type of research relating to the use and nutritional value of limes and designed to advance the image, desirability, marketability, or quality of limes.

#### (14) Secretary

The term "Secretary" means the Secretary of Agriculture.

#### (15) State and United States

The term—

(A) "State" means each of the 50 States of the United States, the District of Columbia, and the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico; and

(B) "United States" means the 50 States of the United States, the District of Columbia, and the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico.

(Pub. L. 101–624, title XIX, §1953, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 3871; Pub. L. 103–194, §3, Dec. 14, 1993, 107 Stat. 2295.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1993—Par. (6). Pub. L. 103–194 substituted "citrus latifolia" for "citrus aurantifolia".
# Sheet1

Alabama

Alaska

American_Samoa

Arizona

Arkansas

California

Colorado

Connecticut

Delaware

District_of_Columbia

Florida

Georgia

GRAND_TOTAL

Guam

Hawaii

Idaho

Illinois

Indian_Tribes_Set_Aside

Indiana

Iowa

Kansas

Kentucky

Louisiana

Maine

Marshall_Islands

Maryland

Massachusetts

Michigan

Micronesia

Minnesota

Mississippi

Missouri

Montana

Nebraska

Nevada

New_Hampshire

New_Jersey

New_Mexico

New_York

North_Carolina

North_Dakota

North_Dakota

Northern_Marianas

Ohio

Oklahoma

Oregon

Other_Non_State_Allocations

Palau

Pennsylvania

Puerto_Rico

Rhode_Island

South_Carolina

South_Dakota

Tennessee

Texas

Utah

Vermont

Virgin_Islands

Virginia

Washington

West_Virginia

Wisconsin

Wyoming
### §393. Sale of pathological and zoological specimens; disposition of moneys

The Secretary of Agriculture is authorized to prepare and sell at cost such pathological and zoological specimens as he may deem of scientific or educational value to scientists or others engaged in the work of hygiene and sanitation: Provided, That all moneys received from the sale of such specimens shall be deposited in the Treasury as miscellaneous receipts.

(Mar. 4, 1913, ch. 145, §1 [part], 37 Stat. 833.)

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

Functions of Bureau of Animal Industry transferred to Secretary of Agriculture by 1947 Reorg. Plan No. 1, §301, eff. July 1, 1947, 12 F.R. 4534, 61 Stat. 952. See note set out under section 391 of this title.
----

----

|   | (1) | the      report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the      information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                 |   |                                                            |   |
|--------------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Date:  March      27, 2008 | By:    | /s/ Thomas      J. Meaney                                  |   |
|                                 |   | Thomas      J. MeaneyPresident      and Chief Financial Officer |   |
Case: 1:11-cv-08980 Document #: 1 Filed: 12/19/11 Page 1 of 30 PageID #:1
Case: 1:11-cv-08980 Document #: 1 Filed: 12/19/11 Page 2 of 30 PageID #:2
Case: 1:11-cv-08980 Document #: 1 Filed: 12/19/11 Page 3 of 30 PageID #:3
Case: 1:11-cv-08980 Document #: 1 Filed: 12/19/11 Page 4 of 30 PageID #:4
Case: 1:11-cv-08980 Document #: 1 Filed: 12/19/11 Page 5 of 30 PageID #:5
Case: 1:11-cv-08980 Document #: 1 Filed: 12/19/11 Page 6 of 30 PageID #:6
Case: 1:11-cv-08980 Document #: 1 Filed: 12/19/11 Page 7 of 30 PageID #:7
Case: 1:11-cv-08980 Document #: 1 Filed: 12/19/11 Page 8 of 30 PageID #:8
Case: 1:11-cv-08980 Document #: 1 Filed: 12/19/11 Page 9 of 30 PageID #:9
Case: 1:11-cv-08980 Document #: 1 Filed: 12/19/11 Page 10 of 30 PageID #:10
Case: 1:11-cv-08980 Document #: 1 Filed: 12/19/11 Page 11 of 30 PageID #:11
Case: 1:11-cv-08980 Document #: 1 Filed: 12/19/11 Page 12 of 30 PageID #:12
Case: 1:11-cv-08980 Document #: 1 Filed: 12/19/11 Page 13 of 30 PageID #:13
Case: 1:11-cv-08980 Document #: 1 Filed: 12/19/11 Page 14 of 30 PageID #:14
Case: 1:11-cv-08980 Document #: 1 Filed: 12/19/11 Page 15 of 30 PageID #:15
Case: 1:11-cv-08980 Document #: 1 Filed: 12/19/11 Page 16 of 30 PageID #:16
Case: 1:11-cv-08980 Document #: 1 Filed: 12/19/11 Page 17 of 30 PageID #:17
Case: 1:11-cv-08980 Document #: 1 Filed: 12/19/11 Page 18 of 30 PageID #:18
Case: 1:11-cv-08980 Document #: 1 Filed: 12/19/11 Page 19 of 30 PageID #:19
Case: 1:11-cv-08980 Document #: 1 Filed: 12/19/11 Page 20 of 30 PageID #:20
Case: 1:11-cv-08980 Document #: 1 Filed: 12/19/11 Page 21 of 30 PageID #:21
Case: 1:11-cv-08980 Document #: 1 Filed: 12/19/11 Page 22 of 30 PageID #:22
Case: 1:11-cv-08980 Document #: 1 Filed: 12/19/11 Page 23 of 30 PageID #:23
Case: 1:11-cv-08980 Document #: 1 Filed: 12/19/11 Page 24 of 30 PageID #:24
Case: 1:11-cv-08980 Document #: 1 Filed: 12/19/11 Page 25 of 30 PageID #:25
Case: 1:11-cv-08980 Document #: 1 Filed: 12/19/11 Page 26 of 30 PageID #:26
Case: 1:11-cv-08980 Document #: 1 Filed: 12/19/11 Page 27 of 30 PageID #:27
Case: 1:11-cv-08980 Document #: 1 Filed: 12/19/11 Page 28 of 30 PageID #:28
Case: 1:11-cv-08980 Document #: 1 Filed: 12/19/11 Page 29 of 30 PageID #:29
Case: 1:11-cv-08980 Document #: 1 Filed: 12/19/11 Page 30 of 30 PageID #:30
### §361e. Payment of allotments to State agricultural experiment stations; directors and treasurers or other officers; accounting; reports to Secretary; replacement by States of diminished, lost or misapplied allotments; subsequent allotments or payments contingent on such replacement

Sums available for allotment to the States under the terms of sections 361a to 361i of this title, excluding the Multistate Research Fund, State Agricultural Experiment Stations, shall be paid to each State agricultural experiment station in equal quarterly payments beginning on the first day of October of each fiscal year upon vouchers approved by the Secretary of Agriculture. Each such station authorized to receive allotted funds shall have a chief administrative officer known as a director, and a treasurer or other officer appointed by the governing board of the station. Such treasurer or other officer shall receive and account for all funds allotted to the State under the provisions of sections 361a to 361i of this title and shall report, with the approval of the director, to the Secretary of Agriculture on or before the first day of December of each year a detailed statement of the amount received under provisions of said sections during the preceding fiscal year, and of its disbursement on schedules prescribed by the Secretary of Agriculture. If any portion of the allotted moneys received by the authorized receiving officer of any State agricultural experiment station shall by any action or contingency be diminished, lost, or misapplied, it shall be replaced by the State concerned and until so replaced no subsequent appropriation shall be allotted or paid to such State.

(Mar. 2, 1887, ch. 314, §5, 24 Stat. 441; Aug. 11, 1955, ch. 790, §1, 69 Stat. 673; Pub. L. 94–273, §9(2), Apr. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 378; Pub. L. 105–185, title II, §203(c)(3), June 23, 1998, 112 Stat. 535.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 368a of this title. See sections 361c and 361d of this title.

#### Amendments

1998—Pub. L. 105–185, §203(c)(3), substituted "Multistate Research Fund, State Agricultural Experiment Stations" for "regional research fund authorized by section 361c(c)(3) of this title" in first sentence.

1976—Pub. L. 94–273 substituted "October" for "July" and "December" for "September".

1955—Act Aug. 11, 1955, amended section generally to provide for quarterly payment of allotments, to require annual report of allotments and disbursements, and to provide for replacement of funds diminished, lost, or misapplied. For provisions which authorized appropriations for investigations and experiments, see sections 361c and 361d of this title.
at(

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Thurman Ross

V.

Career Education Corp. et al

Case No: 12 C 276

Judge: John W. Darrah

ORDER

Plaintiffs' unopposed motion for preliminary approval of class action settlement is granted I l0].

Enter order. Status hearing/settlement hearing is set for 4l3l14 at 10:00 a.m.

Date: 1l16l13 isl Judge John W. Darrah

: ,;]03 I:qLH+^sm 

"Sn

ituJ li

9$ :l l{I [t f30 tl0e

, I llilit:-ri!. L '' -r' "

1'U I

Case: 1:12-cv-00276 Document #: 112 Filed: 11/06/13 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:2693
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000317781
<NAME> ANCHOR PACIFIC UNDERWRITERS, INC.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                       4,350,487
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,396,590
<ALLOWANCES>                                    45,543
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,039,009
<PP&E>                                       3,084,861
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,464,350
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,544,615
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,974,782
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           93,836
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     363,406
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,544,615
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            10,092,532
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               10,574,909
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             285,049
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (938,221)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     8,470
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (946,691)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (946,691)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.21)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.21)


</TABLE>
§ 935.11 Permits. ( a ) Permits in effect on the dates specified in § 935.4 continue in effect until revoked or rescinded by the Commander. Permits issued by the Commander shall conform to the requirements of Air Force Instruction 32-9003 (Available from the National Technical Information Service, 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, VA 22161.). No permit or registration shall be issued under other authority that is inconsistent with this part. The Commander may issue island permits or registration for— ( 1 ) Businesses, including any trade, profession, calling, or occupation, and any establishment where food or beverages are prepared, offered, or sold for human consumption.
( 2 ) Self-propelled motor vehicles, except aircraft, including attached trailers.
( 3 ) Vehicle operators.
( 4 ) Boats.
( 5 ) Food handlers.
( 6 ) Drugs, narcotics, and poisons.
( 7 ) Construction.
( 8 ) Burials.
( b ) To the extent it is not inconsistent with this part, any permit or registration issued pursuant to Air Force directives or instructions as applicable to Wake Island shall constitute a permit or registration under this section, and no other permit or registration shall be required.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Tellabs, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-K for the year ended January 1, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert W. Pullen, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to and for
purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Robert W. Pullen   
|Robert W. Pullen       
|Chief Executive Officer
|Date: March 1, 2010    

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
#### In the Matter of Catherine M. Foster, Appellant, v Robert F. *748Lusher, Respondent.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on May 12, 1977, affirmed, without costs and without disbursements, on the opinion of McDonald. J. Concur-Kupferman, J. P., Silverman and Fein, JJ.

Birns and Sandler, JJ., dissent in the following memorandum by Birns, J.:

We would reverse, dismiss the defense of Statute of Limitations and direct a trial. The rule to be applied in this case is found in *Schuerf v Fowler*(2 AD2d 541): "We construe the law to require a clear acknowledgment about which there is no doubt or equivocation. That does not mean that the acknowledgment would have to be in any precise words, but it should be clear and definite on the face of the writing or in its context.” The evidence submitted at the hearing on the issue of whether the proceeding was barred by the Statute of Limitations included a letter dated "16 February” (1967). That letter, written by respondent during petitioner’s pregnancy with the child, Duncan, born August 24, 1967, for whom petitioner now seeks support, discusses the parties’ personal relationship, other personal and family events, respondent’s love and longing for petitioner, and refers to his three children by his marriage&emdash;Anne, Tess and Robbie (three girls or two girls and one boy). The letter contains the following: "I hope, darling, that you won’t be disappointed if it [is] a girl. I seem to have a tendency to *beget*more of them than I do boys.” (Emphasis added.) The dictionary (Webster’s Third New International Dictionary of the English Language Unabridged, 1971) defines "beget” as "to procreate as the *father:*sire” (emphasis added). In fact, the Book of Genesis from the fall of Adam and Eve traces descendant after descendant in the past tense of "beget” so that there is no doubt of the parentage of any of the biblical persons mentioned. The word "beget” appears to have been carefully chosen by respondent. In the context of the letter, it is a clear and definite acknowledgment by respondent, about which there is no doubt or equivocation, that he was the natural father of the expected child. The acknowledgment of parentage here could hardly be more direct. In our opinion, in these circumstances, the Statute of Limitations is not a bar to the proceeding. The petitioner is entitled to a trial.