alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                          5
<MULTIPLIER>                       1,000
       
<S>                                <C>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  MAY-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                     JUN-1-1998
<PERIOD-END>                       FEB-28-1999
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      9-MOS
<CASH>                                             891
<SECURITIES>                                        0 
<RECEIVABLES>                                   60,649
<ALLOWANCES>                                     6,728
<INVENTORY>                                         0 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    0 
<PP&E>                                         510,910
<DEPRECIATION>                                 242,457
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 391,522
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               0 
<BONDS>                                             0 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0 
<PREFERRED>                                         0 
<COMMON>                                        10,457
<OTHER-SE>                                          0 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   391,522
<SALES>                                         27,320
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               206,406
<CGS>                                           25,589
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  167,470
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,908
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 29,028
<INCOME-TAX>                                    11,901
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             17,127
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0 
<CHANGES>                                           0 
<NET-INCOME>                                    17,127
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.70
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.68
        

</TABLE>
#### § 97.5 Responsibilities—GC DoD.

The GC DoD has overall responsibility for the policy in this part, oversees the implementation of its procedures throughout the DoD, and provides supplemental guidance as appropriate.
### §§2801 to 2813. Repealed. Pub. L. 106–224, title IV, §438(a)(4), June 20, 2000, 114 Stat. 454

Section 2801, Pub. L. 93–629, §2, Jan. 3, 1975, 88 Stat. 2148, set forth congressional findings regarding importation or distribution in interstate commerce of noxious weeds.

Section 2802, Pub. L. 93–629, §3, Jan. 3, 1975, 88 Stat. 2148; Pub. L. 105–86, title VII, §728, Nov. 18, 1997, 111 Stat. 2108, defined terms as used in this chapter.

Section 2803, Pub. L. 93–629, §4, Jan. 3, 1975, 88 Stat. 2149; Pub. L. 100–449, title III, §301(f)(4), Sept. 28, 1988, 102 Stat. 1869; Pub. L. 103–465, title IV, §431(f), Dec. 8, 1994, 108 Stat. 4968, prohibited movement of noxious weeds into or through the United States or interstate, unless in accordance with regulations to prevent dissemination.

Section 2804, Pub. L. 93–629, §5, Jan. 3, 1975, 88 Stat. 2149, authorized promulgation of quarantines and other regulations requiring inspection of articles and means of conveyance.

Section 2805, Pub. L. 93–629, §6, Jan. 3, 1975, 88 Stat. 2149, authorized Secretary of Agriculture to seize, quarantine, treat, destroy, or otherwise dispose of infested articles or means of conveyance.

Section 2806, Pub. L. 93–629, §7, Jan. 3, 1975, 88 Stat. 2150, authorized warrantless inspections of articles and means of conveyance and searches of premises pursuant to warrants.

Section 2807, Pub. L. 93–629, §8, Jan. 3, 1975, 88 Stat. 2151, set forth penalties for violations of sections 2803, 2804, and regulations promulgated under this chapter.

Section 2808, Pub. L. 93–629, §9, Jan. 3, 1975, 88 Stat. 2151, related to cooperation with Federal, State, and local agencies and appointment of employees thereof as collaborators to assist in administration of provisions of this chapter.

Section 2809, Pub. L. 93–629, §10, Jan. 3, 1975, 88 Stat. 2151, authorized promulgation of regulations necessary to effectuate provisions of this chapter.

Section 2810, Pub. L. 93–629, §11, Jan. 3, 1975, 88 Stat. 2151, authorized appropriations and described availability of sums and limitations on their use.

Section 2811, Pub. L. 93–629, §12, Jan. 3, 1975, 88 Stat. 2152, related to inapplicability of provisions of this chapter to shipments of seed subject to certain other laws.

Section 2812, Pub. L. 93–629, §13, Jan. 3, 1975, 88 Stat. 2152, provided that provisions of this chapter would not invalidate provisions of State and local laws, except as such laws would permit prohibited actions.

Section 2813, Pub. L. 93–629, §14, Jan. 3, 1975, 88 Stat. 2152, related to separability of provisions.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Short Title

Pub. L. 93–629, §1, Jan. 3, 1975, 88 Stat. 2148, provided: "That this Act [enacting this chapter] may be cited as the 'Federal Noxious Weed Act of 1974'."
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

# TIME AND DATE: 

Friday, January 15, 2021, 1:00 p.m. Eastern Time.

# PLACE: 

                        Because of the COVID-19 pandemic, the meeting will be held as an audio-only conference. The public may listen to the audio-only conference by following the instructions that will be posted on                         *www.eeoc.gov*                         24 hours before the meeting. Closed captioning services will be available.                    

# STATUS: 

The meeting will be open to the public.

# MATTER TO BE CONSIDERED:

                        The following item will be considered:                              ( print page 2416)    

## Proposed Updated Compliance Manual on Religious Discrimination

# Note:

                        In accordance with the Sunshine Act, the public will be able to listen to the Commission's deliberations and voting. (In addition to publishing notices on EEOC Commission meetings in the                         **Federal Register**                        , the Commission also provides information about Commission meetings on its website,                         *www.eeoc.gov.*                         and provides a recorded announcement a week in advance on future Commission meetings.)                    

                    Please telephone (202) 663-7100 (voice) or (202) 921-2750, or email                     *commissionmeetingcomments@eeoc.gov*                     at any time for information on this meeting.                

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

Rachel V. See, Acting Executive Officer, (202) 921-2545.

Dated: January 8, 2021.

Rachel V. See,

Acting Executive Officer, Executive Secretariat.

[FR Doc. 2021-00524 Filed 1-8-21; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6570-01-P
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Tellabs, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-K for the year ended January 1, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Timothy J. Wiggins, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to and for
purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Timothy J. Wiggins 
|Timothy J. Wiggins     
|Chief Financial Officer
|Date: March 1, 2010    

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
### §51b. Licensing samplers; revocation and suspension of license

Further to carry out the purposes of this chapter the Secretary of Agriculture is authorized to issue to any qualified person, upon presentation of satisfactory evidence of competency, a license to sample cotton. Any such license may be suspended or revoked by the Secretary of Agriculture whenever he is satisfied that such licensee is incompetent or has knowingly or carelessly sampled cotton improperly, or has violated any provision of this chapter or the regulations thereunder so far as the same may relate to him, or has used his license, or allowed it to be used, for any improper purpose. The Secretary of Agriculture may prescribe by regulation the conditions under which licenses may be issued hereunder, and may require any licensed sampler to give bond for the faithful performance of his duties and for the protection of persons affected thereby and may prescribe the conditions under which cotton shall be sampled by licensed samplers for the purpose of classification by officers of the Department of Agriculture, or by licensed cotton classifiers.

(Mar. 4, 1933, ch. 284, §2, 47 Stat. 1621.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

This section was not enacted as part of the United States Cotton Standards Act which comprises this chapter.
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Russel C. Smith, Respondent, v. Evergreen Cemetery Assoc. et al., Appellants, and Special Funds Conservation Committee, Respondent. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.

Appeal by the employer and its carrier from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Board. In June, 1958, a Referee’s decision was handed down holding that claimant, a cemetery caretaker, had traumatic osteoarthritis of both hips and finding *“*accident ”, notice and causal relationship. There is no question that the finding of an accident is erroneous, the disability, if connected with employment at all, resulting from an occupational disease. Nevertheless, no appeal was taken even to the board from this decision nor was any question raised as to the propriety thereof, although several continuation orders were issued in the interim, until April, 1960 when the carrier requested the board to consider whether claimant’s condition could be properly classified as an occupational disease under the rule established in *Matter of Detenbeck*v. *General Motors Corp.*(309 N. Y. 558). This the board refused to do, and again no appeal was taken and payments were continued. In April, 1961 another application was made to the board on the very same grounds. The board after rectifying the 1958 finding by changing it from accident to occupational disease, again did not reach the merits involved but instead denied the relief sought on the grounds that the carrier’s application was untimely since it was aware that no accidental occurrence was being alleged when it accepted the Referee’s decision. We agree. The record would clearly seem to indicate that despite the reference to “ accident ” the original decision was a finding of an occupational disease, and, *Detenbeck*was, of course, decided prior to the 1958 decision and thus was available to appellants at that time. Furthermore, appellants not only did not raise the issue in 1958 but did not appeal the board’s 1960 adverse decision. There is here no mention of newly discovered evidence (cf. *Matter of Barrow*v. *Loon Lake Hotel,*3 A D 2d 783). Under these circumstances we find nothing arbitrary or capricious in the board’s refusal in its discretion to reopen this issue (Workmen’s Compensation Law, § 23; *Matter of La Porta*v. *Wakefield Realty Corp.,*11 A D 2d 882). Decision affirmed, with costs to the Woi'kmen’s Compensation Board. Bergan, P. J., Coon, Herlihy and Reynolds, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from SEC
Form 10Q and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-02-1998
<CASH>                                         114,019
<SECURITIES>                                    10,142
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     59,813
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               201,880
<PP&E>                                         199,270
<DEPRECIATION>                                 101,783
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 320,072
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           45,525
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,538
<OTHER-SE>                                     262,751
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   320,072
<SALES>                                        132,962
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               132,962
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   66,108
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                51,075
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 15,779
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,838
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              9,941
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     9,941
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .19
        

</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of Jazminn O’Dell P., Also Known as Jazzminn P., a Child Alleged to be Permanently Neglected. Victoria C., Appellant; Graham-Windham Services to Families and Children, Respondent.

[833 NYS2d 67]

Order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Sara E Schechter, J.), entered on or about July 13, 2005, which, upon a finding of permanent neglect, terminated the respondent mother’s parental rights with respect to the subject child and transferred custody and guardianship of the child to petitioner agency and the Commissioner of Social Services of the City of New York for the purpose of adoption, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Although the finding of permanent neglect is not challenged, respondent contends that her efforts to remediate the problems leading to the child’s placement warrant a suspended judgment. While those efforts are commendable, the record affords little basis to conclude that the child’s best interests would ultimately be served by a suspended judgment *(see Matter of Michael B.,*80 NY2d 299, 311 [1992]). The child, now six years of age, has bonded with her foster parents with whom she has lived since infancy, and there was no evidence of a parental relationship with the mother sufficient to justify delay of the adoptive process *(see Matter of Amanda R.,*215 AD2d 220, 221 [1995]). Concur—Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Sullivan, Nardelli and Buckley, JJ.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsExperimental Determination of in Situ Utilization of Lunar Regolith for Thermal Energy StorageA Lunar Thermal Energy from Regolith (LUTHER) experiment has been designed and fabricated at the NASA Lewis Research Center to determine the feasibility of using lunar soil as thermal energy storage media. The experimental apparatus includes an alumina ceramic canister (25.4 cm diameter by 45.7 cm length) which contains simulated lunar regolith, a heater (either radiative or conductive), 9 heat shields, a heat transfer cold jacket, and 19 type B platinum rhodium thermocouples. The simulated lunar regolith is a basalt, mined and processed by the University of Minnesota, that closely resembles the lunar basalt returned to earth by the Apollo missions. The experiment will test the effects of vacuum, particle size, and density on the thermophysical properties of the regolith. The properties include melt temperature (range), specific heat, thermal conductivity, and latent heat of storage. Two separate tests, using two different heaters, will be performed to study the effect of heating the system using radiative and conductive heat transfer. The physical characteristics of the melt pattern, material compatibility of the molten regolith, and the volatile gas emission will be investigated by heating a portion of the lunar regolith to its melting temperature (1435 K) in a 10(exp -4) pascal vacuum chamber, equipped with a gas spectrum analyzer. A finite differencing SINDA model was developed at NASA Lewis Research Center to predict the performance of the LUTHER experiment. The analytical results of the code will be compared with the experimental data generated by the LUTHER experiment. The code will predict the effects of vacuum, particle size, and density has on the heat transfer to the simulated regolith.Document ID19930007428Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsRichter, Scott W.*(Sverdrup Technology, Inc. Brook Park, OH, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1993Subject CategoryEnergy Production And ConversionReport/Patent NumberNASA-CR-191050E-7516NAS 1.26:191050E-7515Accession Number93N16617Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 506-41-31CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS3-25266Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19930007428.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, June 07, 2021.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, June 07, 2021

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A21I0207. WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY FSB d/b/a CHRISTIANA 

TRUST AS TRUSTEE FOR TOORAK REPO SELLER I TRUST v. JDZ 

INVESTMENTS, LLC.

Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

2019CV069986 2020CV072296
<TABLE>
                                EXHIBIT 11(a)
<CAPTION>
  
                               GROSSMAN'S INC.
 
                      COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                    (in thousands, except per share data)
 
 
 
                                                 THREE MONTHS ENDED
                                                     MARCH 31,     
                                                --------------------
                                                  1997        1996
                                                  ----        ----
 <S>                                            <C>         <C>
 Net loss for primary and fully   
   diluted earnings per share                   $(12,021)   $(54,687)
                                                =========   =========
 
 Weighted average number of shares
   outstanding                                    27,818      26,089 
 
 Net effect of dilutive stock options                 -           -   
                                                            
 
 Total weighted average shares 
   outstanding and common stock
   equivalents used in primary 
   calculation of earnings per share              27,818      26,089 
 
 Additional dilution from stock                        
   options                                            -           -    
 
 
 Total weighted average shares 
   outstanding and common stock
   equivalents used in fully diluted
   calculation of earnings per share              27,818      26,089 
                                                =========    ======== 
 
 
 Primary loss per share                         $ (0.43)     $(2.10) 
                                                =========    ======== 
 
 Fully diluted loss per share                   $ (0.43)     $(2.10) 
                                                =========    ======== 
 
 
</TABLE>