alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed March 22, 2023. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D22-1431 Lower Tribunal No. 15-14107

________________ Monica Gascon and Alexis Schloeter,

Appellants,
vs. The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., etc., Appellee. An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Antonio Arzola, Judge. Pomeranz & Associates, P.A., and Mark L. Pomeranz (Hallandale), for appellants. Wargo, French & Singer, LLP, and Anthony R. Yanez, for appellee. Before EMAS, SCALES and MILLER, JJ. PER CURIAM.2

Affirmed. See Roman v. Wells Fargo Bank, 143 So. 3d 489, 490 n.1 (Fla. 5th DCA 2014) (affirming final summary judgment in favor of the bank because the mortgage’s notice provision required only that the bank mail or deliver the default letter to the borrower’s notice address, not that the borrower receive it); Bank of America v. Nash, 200 So. 3d 131, 135 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016) (“The fact that the [default] letter may not have been received is irrelevant.”).
###### Editorial Note on Part 842

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 842 appear at 81 FR 83688, Nov. 22, 2016.

#### § 842.120 Improper claimants.

CAP members, 18 years of age or older, whose personal injury or death claim is subject to the Federal Employees' Compensation Act, are improper claimants. FECA is their exclusive remedy.

[55 FR 2809, Jan. 29, 1990. Redesignated at 81 FR 83700, 83701, Nov. 22, 2016]
```

                                                     EXHIBIT 32.2

                   Section 1350 Certification
                 By Principal Financial Officer

     I,  Craig  R.  Jones, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350,  as adpoted pursuant to  Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that the periodic report, to which this Statement is
attached,  fully complies  with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d)  of  the  Securities and Exchange Act of  1934,  and the
information  contained  in  the  periodic report  to  which  this
Statement is attached, fairly presents, in all material respects,
the  financial   condition  and  results  of  operations  of  the
registrant.

     A  signed  original  of  this  written  statement  has  been
provided  to the Company and will be retained by the Company  and
furnished to the SEC upon request.

     Dated December 16, 2005

                              /s/ Craig R. Jones
                              Craig R. Jones
                              Chief Financial Officer
```
### §518f. Limitation on total expenditures

The total amount expended by the Secretary from the Tobacco Trust Fund to make payments under sections 518a and 518b of this title and for the other authorized purposes of the Fund shall not exceed $10,140,000,000.

(Pub. L. 108–357, title VI, §627, Oct. 22, 2004, 118 Stat. 1534.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section applicable to the 2005 and subsequent crops of tobacco, see section 643 of Pub. L. 108–357, set out as a note under section 518 of this title.
* Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions

that have no precedential value and merely decide particular cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-60058 Conference Calendar

__________________ TONY MARASCALCO, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus WESTON BIRDSONG ET AL., Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 3:93-CV-96-B-D

- - - - - - - - - - August 24, 1995
Before KING, JOLLY, and WIENER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Appellant, Tony Marascalco, a Mississippi state prisoner, appeals the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action as barred by the applicable statute of limitations. There is no federal statute of limitations for § 1983 actions, and the federal courts borrow the forum state's general personal injury limitations period. Owens v. Okure , 488 U.S. 235 (1989); Henson-El v. Rogers , 923 F.2d 51, 52 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , 501 U.S. 1235 (1991).No. 95-60058 -2-
Although Marascalco alleged that he was arrested and incarcerated in January and June 1989, he did not allege that he suffered a specific injury or damage during either of those incarcerations. The first date that he alleged that he suffered an actual injury or damage, and the date on which Marascalco's action accrued, was November 1989. As a result, the three-year statute of limitations in Miss. Code Ann. § 15-1-49 (Supp. 1994), which applies to actions accruing after July 1, 1989, is applicable to Marascalco's action. See James v. Sadler , 909 F.2d 834, 836 (5th Cir. 1990). Marascalco's action was not filed within three years of the date that it accrued. Therefore, the district court did not err in dismissing Marascalco's action as barred by the applicable statute of limitations.
AFFIRMED.
80 FY 2019 AGENCY FINANCIAL REPORT | U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

REPORT OF THE INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS | FINANCIAL SECTION

FY 2019 AGENCY FINANCIAL REPORT | U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION 81
FINANCIAL SECTION | REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

82 FY 2019 AGENCY FINANCIAL REPORT | U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

KPMG LLP is a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member 

firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with 

KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. 

KPMG LLP

Suite 12000

1801 K Street, NW

Washington, DC 20006
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS | FINANCIAL SECTION

FY 2019 AGENCY FINANCIAL REPORT | U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION 83
FINANCIAL SECTION | REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

84 FY 2019 AGENCY FINANCIAL REPORT | U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS | FINANCIAL SECTION

FY 2019 AGENCY FINANCIAL REPORT | U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION 85
FINANCIAL SECTION | REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

86 FY 2019 AGENCY FINANCIAL REPORT | U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS | FINANCIAL SECTION

FY 2019 AGENCY FINANCIAL REPORT | U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION 87
FINANCIAL SECTION | REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

88 FY 2019 AGENCY FINANCIAL REPORT | U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS | FINANCIAL SECTION

FY 2019 AGENCY FINANCIAL REPORT | U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION 89
FINANCIAL SECTION | REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

90 FY 2019 AGENCY FINANCIAL REPORT | U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS | FINANCIAL SECTION

FY 2019 AGENCY FINANCIAL REPORT | U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION 91
FINANCIAL SECTION | REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

92 FY 2019 AGENCY FINANCIAL REPORT | U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS | FINANCIAL SECTION

FY 2019 AGENCY FINANCIAL REPORT | U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION 93
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Simon Botwinick, Appellant, v. Arnolds Men Shop, Inc., et al., Respondents. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.

Appeal from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Claimant and his wife are the owners of all the stock of the corporate employer, which operates a retail haberdashery store. Claimant alleges that he suffered a heart attack as the result of his work. He testified that while he was carrying a form and a coat to be used for window display, weighing 35 pounds, he suffered acute pains, which have been diagnosed as due to coronary thrombosis with posterior wall myocardial infarction. The board, reversing a Referee, dismissed the claim. There is proof both for and against this incident as a cause of the attack. Appellant cites many cases in which awards in situations like this have been made by the board and affirmed by the court; and there are many more such eases. But the court faces an entirely different problem when the board has found factually an association between the work and the heart attack and when it has not found such an association. As a matter of law there is substantial evidence in support of this decision; and we do not have authority to require the fact-finding power of the board to be exercised differently. Decision unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Fiscal Year 2018 Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies - NEVADA

FY 2018 Title I

LEA ID District Allocation*

3200390 Carson City School District 1,484,281

3200030 Churchill County School District 743,320

3200060 Clark County School District 106,449,452

3200090 Douglas County School District 744,301

3200120 Elko County School District 1,013,914

3200150 Esmeralda County School District 17,220

3200180 Eureka County School District 23,285

3200210 Humboldt County School District 484,995

3200240 Lander County School District 115,620

3200270 Lincoln County School District 119,718

3200300 Lyon County School District 1,638,227

3200330 Mineral County School District 176,284

3200360 Nye County School District 1,347,906

3200420 Pershing County School District 152,211

3200450 Storey County School District 38,540

3200480 Washoe County School District 14,084,734

3200510 White Pine County School District 251,860

3299999 PART D SUBPART 2 784,308

* Actual amounts received by LEAs will be smaller than shown here due to State-level adjustments to Federal Title I allocations. States adjust

 allocations, for example, to reflect LEA boundary changes or the creation of new LEAs, including charter school LEAs, that are not accounted

 for in the statutory calculations. States also are permitted to reserve, for administration, up to 1 percent of the allocations they would receive

 if $14 billion were appropriated and generally must reserve 7 percent of their allocations for school improvement. These 

 adjustments will reduce the actual amounts available.
Case: 1:12-cv-00572 Document #: 51 Filed: 04/27/12 Page 1 of 7 PageID #:1164
Case: 1:12-cv-00572 Document #: 51 Filed: 04/27/12 Page 2 of 7 PageID #:1165
Case: 1:12-cv-00572 Document #: 51 Filed: 04/27/12 Page 3 of 7 PageID #:1166
Case: 1:12-cv-00572 Document #: 51 Filed: 04/27/12 Page 4 of 7 PageID #:1167
Case: 1:12-cv-00572 Document #: 51 Filed: 04/27/12 Page 5 of 7 PageID #:1168
Case: 1:12-cv-00572 Document #: 51 Filed: 04/27/12 Page 6 of 7 PageID #:1169
Case: 1:12-cv-00572 Document #: 51 Filed: 04/27/12 Page 7 of 7 PageID #:1170
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Oxygen Biotherapeutics, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended January 31, 2010 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Chris J. Stern, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |  |  |                                                
|-------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------------------------------
|Date: March 19, 2010 |  |  |  | /s/ Chris J. Stern                             
|                     |  |  |  | Chris J. Stern                                 
|                     |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer & Chairman of the Board

The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
#### 1211.204-70 Contract clauses.

The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 1252.211-70, Index for Specifications, when an index or table of contents may be furnished with the specification.
#### 1309.206 Acquisitions subject to qualification requirements.
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-22-00163-CR

MARVIN DALE HERRING JR.

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

On Appeal from the

52nd District Court of Coryell County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 15-23110

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

May 25, 2023
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 724 

To amend the Federal Power Act to modernize authorizations for necessary 

hydropower approvals. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 27, 2017 

Ms. MURKOWSKI introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Power Act to modernize 

authorizations for necessary hydropower approvals. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. MODERNIZING AUTHORIZATIONS FOR NEC4 ESSARY HYDROPOWER APPROVALS. 

5 (a) PRELIMINARY PERMITS.—Section 5 of the Fed6 eral Power Act (16 U.S.C. 798) is amended— 

7 (1) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘three’’ and 

8 inserting ‘‘4’’; and 

9 (2) in subsection (b)— 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 724 IS

1 (A) by striking ‘‘Commission may extend 

2 the period of a preliminary permit once for not 

3 more than 2 additional years beyond the 3 

4 years’’ and inserting the following: ‘‘Commis5 sion may— 

6 ‘‘(1) extend the period of a preliminary permit 

7 once for not more than 4 additional years beyond 

8 the 4 years’’; 

9 (B) by striking the period at the end and 

10 inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

11 (C) by adding at the end the following: 

12 ‘‘(2) after the end of an extension period grant13 ed under paragraph (1), issue an additional permit 

14 to the permittee if the Commission determines that 

15 there are extraordinary circumstances that warrant 

16 the issuance of the additional permit.’’. 

17 (b) TIME LIMIT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF PROJECT

18 WORKS.—Section 13 of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 

19 806) is amended in the second sentence by striking ‘‘once 

20 but not longer than two additional years’’ and inserting 

21 ‘‘for not more than 8 additional years,’’. 

Æ 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.

SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Fred C. Schulte, Chief Executive Officer of Elgin National Industries, Inc., certify that:



| | 1. | This quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Elgin National Industries, Inc. fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in this quarterly report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Elgin National Industries, Inc.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/    FRED C.
SCHULTEFred C. SchulteChief Executive Officer


Date: August 11, 2006
Page Banner            

United States Department of Agriculture

Agricultural Research Service

          - **ARS Home**
          - |
          - **About ARS**
          - |
          - **Contact Us**

| Search for This |  |
|-----------------|--|

          -  Research  - Research Home
- National Programs
- Research Projects
- Scientific Manuscripts
- International Programs
- Trending Research Topics
- Scientific Software/Models
- Scientific Collaborations
- Databases and Datasets
 
          -  People & Locations  - Find a person
- Find a location
- Find an office at headquarters
- Organizational chart
- Administrators Council
 
          -  Newsroom  - News Home
- Latest News
- Magazine
- Photos
- Subscription Lists
- Briefing Room
- Podcasts
- Events
- Press Room
- Videos
 
          -  Careers  - ARS Vacancies at USAJOBS
- Careers at ARS Info
- Post Doctoral Positions
 

          - **Site Map**
          - |
          - **A-Z Index**
          - |
          - **Help**

ARS Home

----

# Related Topics

        						Project Team			
        -  **Torrans, Eugene** 
        -  									Bosworth, Brian						 
        -  									Davis, Kenneth						 
        						Project Annual Reports			
        -  									2012						 
        -  									2011						 
        -  									2010						 
        -  									2009						 
        						Related National Programs			
        -  									Aquaculture (106)						 

*Invalid project*

Footer Content
ARS HomeUSDA.govSite MapStatements and DisclaimersPlain WritingFOIAAccessibility StatementPrivacy PolicyNondiscrimination StatementQuality of InformationUSA.govWhite House
Back to Top of Page
#### § 651.23 Environmental impact statement.

An Environmental Impact statement (EIS) is a detailed written statement required by NEPA for major federal actions significantly affecting the quality of the human environment (42 U.S.C. 4321). A more complete discussion of EIS requirements is presented in subpart F of this part.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Dynamic Materials Corporation (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Richard A. Santa, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(i)                  The Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(ii)               The information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   | April 29,  2010                               |   |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |                                               |   |
|   |                                               |   |
|   | /s/ Richard A. Santa                               |   |
|   | Richard A. Santa                                   |   |
|   | Senior Vice President and  Chief Financial Officer |   |
|   | of  Dynamic Materials Corporation                  |   |

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to Dynamic Materials Corporation and will be retained by DynamicMaterials Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.

 

----

** **
### §87i. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act Aug. 11, 1916, ch. 313, pt. B, §20, as added Aug. 13, 1981, Pub. L. 97–35, title I, §155(5), 95 Stat. 372, which established an advisory committee, was effective for the period Oct. 1, 1981, through Sept. 30, 1988, pursuant to section 155 of Pub. L. 97–35, as amended. See section 87j of this title.
#### Hedwig Grossman, Appellant, v. Precision Castings Company, Inc., et al., Respondents.

Judgment affirmed, without costs, on the opinion of Zeller, J., at Special Term (36 Mise 2d 561). Bergan, P. J., Gibson, Reynolds and Taylor, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>     5
<LEGEND>
              THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL 
              INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE COMPANY'S
              FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE PERIOD
              ENDING DECEMBER 31, 1998, AND IS QUALIFIED IN 
              ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
              STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>  1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                          $       373
<SECURITIES>                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                        12,950
<ALLOWANCES>                              0
<INVENTORY>                          12,330
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                     26,997
<PP&E>                               90,373
<DEPRECIATION>                       51,589
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                       75,408
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                12,299
<BONDS>                                   0
<COMMON>                              1,086
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                               0
<OTHER-SE>                           46,195
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>         75,408
<SALES>                              54,983
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                     54,983
<CGS>                                47,402
<TOTAL-COSTS>                        50,826
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      110
<INCOME-PRETAX>                       4,047
<INCOME-TAX>                          1,377
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                   2,670
<DISCONTINUED>                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                          2,670
<EPS-PRIMARY>                          2.46
<EPS-DILUTED>                          2.46
        

</TABLE>
###### Editorial Note on Part 724

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 724 appear at 65 FR 62616, Oct. 19, 2000.

#### § 724.404 Director, Naval Council of Personnel Boards.

Exercises adminstrative control and oversight of the Naval discharge review process. (See subpart C).