alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 596 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 596

 To direct the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration to 
  prescribe regulations establishing minimum standards for space for 
       passengers on passenger aircraft, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 9, 2017

Mr. Blumenthal (for himself, Mr. Schumer, Mr. Markey, Mr. Menendez, and 
Mrs. Feinstein) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
   referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To direct the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration to 
  prescribe regulations establishing minimum standards for space for 
       passengers on passenger aircraft, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Seat Egress in Air Travel Act of 
2017'' or the ``SEAT Act of 2017''.

SEC. 2. REGULATIONS RELATING TO SPACE FOR PASSENGERS ON AIRCRAFT.

    (a) Air Carrier Defined.--In this section, the term ``air carrier'' 
means an air carrier (as defined in section 40102 of title 49, United 
States Code) that transports passengers by aircraft as a common carrier 
for compensation.
    (b) Regulations Relating to Space for Passengers on Aircraft.--Not 
later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the 
Administrator shall prescribe regulations--
            (1) establishing minimum standards for space for passengers 
        on passenger aircraft, including the size, width, and pitch of 
        seats, the amount of leg room, and the width of aisles on such 
        aircraft for the safety and health of passengers; and
            (2) requiring each air carrier to prominently display on 
        the website of the air carrier the amount of space available 
        for each passenger on passenger aircraft operated by the air 
        carrier, including the size, width, and pitch of seats, the 
        amount of leg room, and the width of aisles on such aircraft.
    (c) Consultations.--In prescribing the regulations required under 
subsection (b), the Administrator shall consult with the Occupational 
Safety and Health Administration, the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention, passenger advocacy organizations, physicians, and ergonomic 
engineers.
                                 <all>
```
#### Anna M. Babey-Brooke, Petitioner, v Board of Higher Education of the City of New York et al., Respondents.

Proceeding pursuant to section 298 of the Executive Law to review an order of the State Human Rights Appeal Board, dated August 2, 1978, which dismissed petitioner’s appeal from an order of the State Division of Human Rights, which, after a hearing, dismissed the petitioner’s complaint upon a finding of no probable cause. Order confirmed and proceeding dismissed, without costs or disbursements. We conclude that the determination of the commissioner of the State division, dismissing petitioner’s complaint on the merits, was based upon substantial evidence. Under the circumstances, it is not necessary to reach the procedural question involving the five-month delay by the State division in submitting the record to the State Human Rights Appeal Board. Shapiro, J. P., Cohalan, Margett and O’Connor, JJ., concur.
#### HOLLAND et al., Respondents, v. EDDY et al., Appellants.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

January 6, 1903.)

Action by Nelson Holland and others against George W. Eddy and others.

No opinion. Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          35,075
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   55,152
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    257,463
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               350,165
<PP&E>                                         234,372
<DEPRECIATION>                                 231,804
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 356,814
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          798,100
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        97,014
<OTHER-SE>                                   (538,300)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   356,814
<SALES>                                        363,872
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               363,872
<CGS>                                          310,117
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  310,117
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              15,568
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 38,187
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             38,187
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    38,187
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.04


</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA Supreme Court Cause No. DA 20-0454

STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff and Appellee,

v . GEORGE CARLON, Defendant and Appellant. ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE APPELLANT'S INITIAL BRIEF 

# FILED

NOV 1 6 2021 Bowen Cireenvvood Court State ot Montana At the request ofDefendant / Appellant, and no objection being interposed by the State,this Court hereby extends the filing date ofDefendant's / Appellant'sInitial Brief to Wednesday,November 17, 2021.
So ordered this \ day of k)

Montana Supreme Court
cc: Attorney General Defendant / Appellant c/o Counsel 11/16/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0454
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

FIRSTMERIT BANK, N.A., )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) No. 12 C 887

)

TRINITY MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATES, )

L.P., et al., )

)

Defendants. )

MEMORANDUM ORDER

This Court has received the chambers copy of the First

Amended Complaint (“FAC”) in this mortgage foreclosure action and

has spotted an issue (or, it is hoped, a nonissue) that should

have been raised when the original Complaint was filed months

ago. That matter has to do with the adequacy of the FAC’s

allegations as to the parties’ states of citizenship (federal

subject matter jurisdiction has been invoked on diversity of

citizenship grounds).

As with the original Complaint, the new pleading targets

Trinity Management Associates, L.P. (“Trinity”) as the firstnamed defendant. FAC ¶¶3 through 5 properly identify the

citizenship of members of that limited partnership--but what has

not been said specifically is that the three corporations

referred to in those paragraphs are the limited partnership’s

only members. Such an inference may perhaps be drawn from the

FAC’s allegations themselves, but each paragraph speaks of one of

the corporations as “a limited partner” without nailing the
matter down.

Because complete diversity as between plaintiffs and

defendants is essential, plaintiff’s counsel is ordered to file a

brief amendment to the FAC to confirm its existence. That filing

is ordered to be made on or before December 17, 2012.

________________________________________

Milton I. Shadur

Senior United States District Judge

Date: December 6, 2012

2
### §1371. Reports

Not later than 180 days after the end of each fiscal year, the Attorney General shall submit a report to the Inspector General of the Department of Justice and the Committees on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives and of the Senate describing the following:

#### (1) Public charge deportations

The number of aliens deported on public charge grounds under section 1227(a)(5) 1 of this title during the previous fiscal year.

#### (2) Indigent sponsors

The number of determinations made under section 1631(e) of this title during the previous fiscal year.

#### (3) Reimbursement actions

The number of actions brought, and the amount of each action, for reimbursement under section 1183a of this title (including private collections) for the costs of providing public benefits.

(Pub. L. 104–208, div. C, title V, §565, Sept. 30, 1996, 110 Stat. 3009–684.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 1227(a)(5) of this title, referred to in par. (1), was in the original a reference to "section 241(a)(5) of the Immigration and Nationality Act", which has been translated as referring to section 237(a)(5) of the Immigration and Nationality Act to reflect the probable intent of Congress and the renumbering of section 241 as 237 by Pub. L. 104–208, div. C, title III, §305(a)(2), Sept. 30, 1996, 110 Stat. 3009–598. Pub. L. 104–208, §305(a)(3), enacted a new section 241 of the Immigration and Nationality Act which is classified to section 1231 of this title, but subsec. (a)(5) of that section does not relate to deportation on public charge grounds.

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996, and also as part of the Omnibus Consolidated Appropriations Act, 1997, and not as part of the Immigration and Nationality Act which comprises this chapter.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Abolition of Immigration and Naturalization Service and Transfer of Functions

For abolition of Immigration and Naturalization Service, transfer of functions, and treatment of related references, see note set out under section 1551 of this title.

1 See References in Text note below.
#### § 735.2 Background.

For Armed Forces members and their dependents on duty overseas, registration of vital statistics with an appropriate foreign government may be a distinct advantage should documentary evidence, acceptable in all courts, be required at any future time. Department of Defense (DOD) policy is that military services will require their members to make official record of births, deaths, marriages, etc., with local civil authorities in whose jurisdiction such events occur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   23,569
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      4,588
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                28,801
<PP&E>                                          57,572
<DEPRECIATION>                                  39,574
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  47,590
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,440
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           842
<OTHER-SE>                                      29,851
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    47,590
<SALES>                                         10,188
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                10,188
<CGS>                                            7,225
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,225
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,065
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 209
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    573
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                573
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       573
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.07


</TABLE>
U.S. DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

ATTORNEY APPEARANCE FORM

NOTE: In order to appear before this Court an attorney must either be a member in good

standing of this Court¶s general bar or be granted leave to appear pro hac vice as provided for

by Local Rules 83.12 through 83.14.

In the Matter of Case Number:

AN APPEARANCE IS HEREBY FILED BY THE UNDERSIGNED AS ATTORNEY FOR:

NAME (Type or print)

SIGNATURE (Use electronic signature if the appearance form is filed electronically)

 s/

FIRM

STREET ADDRESS

CITY/STATE/ZIP

ID NUMBER (SEE ITEM 3 IN INSTRUCTIONS) TELEPHONE NUMBER

ARE YOU ACTING AS LEAD COUNSEL IN THIS CASE? YES NO 

ARE YOU ACTING AS LOCAL COUNSEL IN THIS CASE? YES NO 

ARE YOU A MEMBER OF THIS COURT¶S TRIAL BAR? YES NO 

IF THIS CASE REACHES TRIAL, WILL YOU ACT AS THE TRIAL ATTORNEY? YES NO 

IF THIS IS A CRIMINAL CASE, CHECK THE BOX BELOW THAT DESCRIBES YOUR STATUS.

RETAINED COUNSEL APPOINTED COUNSEL 

In Re Innovatio Ventures, LLC, Patent Litigation

1:11-cv-09308

G6 Hospitality LLC

Michael W. De Vries

Michael W. De Vries

Kirkland & Ellis LLP

333 South Hope Street

Los Angeles, CA 90071

213-680-8400

✔

✔

✔

✔

Case: 1:11-cv-09308 Document #: 950 Filed: 09/18/13 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:33673
#### Buffalo Creek Builders, Inc., Appellant, v City of New York, Respondent.

— Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated July 15, 1975,. dismissed, without costs or disbursements. The judgment was superseded by an order dated October 22, 1975. Order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated October 22, 1975, affirmed, without costs or disbursements, on the opinion of Mr. Justice Sirignano at Special Term, dated May 29, 1975. Hopkins, J. P., Damiani, Titone and O’Connor, JJ., concur.
Case: 1:12-cv-00827 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 02/06/12 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:15
Case: 1:12-cv-00827 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 02/06/12 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:16
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### International Trade Commission

          - [Investigation No. 731-TA-1469 (Final)]

# AGENCY:

United States International Trade Commission.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

                        On January 4, 2021, the Department of Commerce published notice in the                         **Federal Register**                         of a negative final determination of sales at less than fair value in connection with the subject investigation concerning Brazil (86 FR 70). Accordingly, the antidumping duty investigation concerning wood mouldings and millwork products from Brazil (Investigation No. 731-TA-1469 (Final)) is terminated.                    

# DATES:

January 4, 2021.

      ( print page 1523)    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Keysha Martinez (202-205-2136), Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436. Hearing-impaired individuals are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on 202-205-1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202-205-2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server (                        *https://www.usitc.gov*). The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at                         *https://edis.usitc.gov.*

*Authority:*                         This investigation is being terminated under authority of title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930 and pursuant to section 207.40(a) of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.40(a)). This notice is published pursuant to section 201.10 of the Commission's rules (19 CFR 201.10).                    

By order of the Commission.

Issued: January 5, 2021.

Lisa Barton,

Secretary to the Commission.

[FR Doc. 2021-00140 Filed 1-7-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
<PAGE>

                        AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


WHEREAS, Arnold M. Anderson (the "Employee") and Successories, Inc. (formerly
Celex Group, Inc.) (the "Company") previously entered into an Employment
Agreement dated March 1, 1996.

WHEREAS, the Employee and the Company have agreed to amend the Employment
Agreement as set forth in this Amendment.

NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual obligations and covenants set
forth below, the parties hereby agree as follows:

The following provision is added to the Employment Agreement as Section 10.9:

     In the event of the termination, expiration or non-renewal of this
     Employment Agreement for any reason other than "just cause", the time
     period during which Employee shall be entitled to exercise those stock
     options previously granted to Employee in which Employee is vested and
     eligible to exercise (pursuant to the terms of the applicable Option
     Agreement) shall be extended to two (2) years from the date of such
     termination, expiration or non-renewal or the end of the term of this
     Employment Agreement, whichever is later. In the event of a termination for
     just cause, the terms of each individual Option Agreement shall apply.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this first Amendment to the
Employment Agreement as of this 14th day of January, 1997.



SUCCESSORIES, INC.                             EMPLOYEE:  ARNOLD M. ANDERSON



By:      /s/ Timothy C. Dillon                     /s/ Arnold M. Anderson
         --------------------------------      -------------------------------

Its:     Secretary
         --------------------------------
November 22, 1974.

C. A. No. 73-243.

#### State *v.*Arthur Fales.

*Richard J. Israel,*Attorney General, for plaintiff. *Raymond J. Daniels,*for defendant.

Motion of defendant to reassign, which is scheduled for argument on December 3, 1974, is granted and the argument is reassigned to February 3, 1975.
### SUBCHAPTER III—QUOTA AND NONQUOTA IMMIGRANTS
#### 1425.1001 Waiver of right to examination of records.

The Director, PAM is authorized to make the determinations prescribed in FAR 25.1001(b). Determinations shall be prepared by the CO and submitted through the HCA to the Director, PAM.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED
STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          11,555
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  122,182
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,118
<INVENTORY>                                    150,423
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               313,527
<PP&E>                                         287,704
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0<F1>
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 695,469
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          162,982
<BONDS>                                        126,472
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        22,940
<OTHER-SE>                                     349,740
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   695,469
<SALES>                                        390,560<F2>
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               390,560
<CGS>                                          297,672<F2>
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  297,672
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                50,058
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,653
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 30,615
<INCOME-TAX>                                    10,715
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             19,900
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    731
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    19,169
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.98
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.98
<FN>
<F1>This amount is not disclosed in the financial statements and thus a value of
zero has been shown for purposes of this financial data schedule.
<F2>These line items include certain amounts related to non-tangible products
(i.e.,) services, however, since the amounts related to services are not
disclosed in the financial statements, the total revenue and CGS figures,
respectively, have been shown on these line items for purposes of this
financial data schedule
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
### §940b. Use of funds

A borrower of an insured or guaranteed electric loan under this chapter may, without restriction or prior approval of the Secretary, invest its own funds or make loans or guarantees, not in excess of 15 percent of its total utility plant.

(May 20, 1936, ch. 432, title III, §312, as added Pub. L. 100–203, title I, §1402, Dec. 22, 1987, 101 Stat. 1330–21; amended Pub. L. 103–354, title II, §235(a)(13), Oct. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 3221.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1994—Pub. L. 103–354 substituted "Secretary" for "Administrator".