alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Steve Wuckich, Alias Steve Wilson, Appellant, v. Sarto C. Major, as Sheriff of the County of Onondaga, Respondent.

Order reversed, without costs of this appeal to either party and matter remitted to Onondaga County Court for further proceed*1004ings in accordance with the memorandum. Memorandum: Upon the papers presented in this habeas corpus proceeding we construe the petition as seeking petitioner’s release because of failure of the District Attorney to comply with section 669-a of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Thus limited we conclude that a hearing should have been held to determine whether the petitioner had served a proper notice as required by section 669-a. The court should make detailed findings as to what was done by the petitioner to bring the matter to the attention of the District Attorney. All concur except McClusky, J., who dissents and votes for affirmance in the following memorandum: The prisoner has not established by the record before us that he complied with section 669-a of the Code of Criminal Procedure. I disagree with the court below in holding that habeas corpus is not the proper remedy under this particular section. (Appeal from order of Onondaga County Court dismissing the writ of habeas corpus and remanding relator to the custody of the Sheriff of Onondaga County.) Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Goldman, Halpern and McClusky, JJ.
#### 1452.236-70 Prohibition Against Use of Lead-based Paint.

As prescribed in 1436.570(b), insert the following clause:

# Prohibition Against Use of Lead-Based Paint—Department of the Interior (JUL 1996)

Paint containing more than .06 percent by weight of lead in paint, or the equivalent measure of lead in the dried film of paint already applied, shall not be used in the construction or rehabilitation of residential structures under this contract or any resulting subcontracts.

(End of clause)
§ 750.68 Claims not payable. ( a ) A claim for damage, loss, or destruction of property or the personal injury or death caused wholly or partly by a negligent or wrongful act of the claimant or his agent or employee.
( b ) A claim, or any part thereof, that is legally recoverable by the claimant under an indemnifying law or indemnity contract.
( c ) A subrogated claim.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-41088

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

EDGAR GUADALUPE HERNANDEZ-HERRERA,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:10-CR-839-1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, CLEMENT, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Edgar Guadalupe

Hernandez-Herrera (Hernandez) has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed

a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United

States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Hernandez has not filed a

response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the

record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal

presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

August 16, 2011

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 10-41088 Document: 00511573825 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/16/2011
No. 10-41088

motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further

responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

2

Case: 10-41088 Document: 00511573825 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/16/2011
#### CISSELL v. GLOVER LANDSCAPE SUPPLY, INC.

No. 356A97

Case below: 126 N.C.App. 667

Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 and Appellate Rule 16(b) as to issues in addition to those presented as the basis for the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals denied 6 November 1997.
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-91,886-01

EX PARTE TIMOTHY DECARLOS SIMS, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 27895 HC-1 IN THE 6 DISTRICT COURT TH

FROM LAMAR COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N

Applicant was convicted of aggravated assault and sentenced to eighty years’ imprisonment.

The Sixth Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. Sims v. State, No. 06-19-00016-CR (Tex.

App.—Texarkana Jul. 31, 2019) (not designated for publication). Applicant filed this application for

a writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and the district clerk forwarded it to this Court.

See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07.

Applicant contendsthat appellate counselfailed to timelyinformApplicant that his conviction

had been affirmed and advise him of his right to file a pro se petition for discretionary review. Based

on the record, the trial court has determined that appellate counsel’s performance was deficient and

that Applicant would have timely filed a petition for discretionary review but for counsel’s deficient
2

performance.

Relief is granted. Ex parte Wilson, 956 S.W.2d 25 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997); Ex parte Crow,

180 S.W.3d 135 (Tex.Crim. App. 2005). Applicant may file an out-of-time petition for discretionary

review of the judgment of the Sixth Court of Appeals in cause number 06-19-00016-CR. Should

Applicant decide to file a petition for discretionary review, he must file it with this Court within thirty

days from the date of this Court’s mandate.

Copies ofthis opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department ofCriminalJustice–Correctional

Institutions Division and the Board of Pardons and Paroles.

Delivered: February 24, 2021

Do not publish
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         115,445
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          45,019
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               100,018
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    279,755
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         426,515
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           440,822
<LOANS>                                      1,677,807
<ALLOWANCE>                                     22,099
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,759,056
<DEPOSITS>                                   2,319,130
<SHORT-TERM>                                   110,461
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             26,530
<LONG-TERM>                                     21,570
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        43,788
<OTHER-SE>                                     237,577
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               2,759,056
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                111,231
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               32,065
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 5,569
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               148,865
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              58,165
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,698
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           87,002
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    2,790
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 733
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 69,282
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 41,142
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      41,142
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    26,829
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.22
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.69
<LOANS-NON>                                     14,451
<LOANS-PAST>                                     2,067
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   565
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                 17,438
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                21,690
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    2,849
<RECOVERIES>                                       468
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               22,099
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            22,099
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
§ 761.15 Aircraft: Individual authorizations. ( a ) *Special procedures.* In addition to the entry authorization to enter or navigate within the defense area concerned, certain special procedures must be followed by aircraft: ( 1 ) If landing at U.S. naval aviation facilities, an Aviation Facility License must be obtained, in accordance with Secretary of the Navy Instruction 3770.1B, Use of Department of the Navy aviation facilities by other than United States Department of Defense aircraft.
( 2 ) If landing at U.S. Air Force aviation facilities, a Civil Aircraft Landing Permit must be obtained, in accordance with Department of the Airforce Regulation 55-20, Use of United States Air Force installations by other than United States Department of Defense aircraft.
( 3 ) Foreign public aircraft must obtain diplomatic clearance or clearance under applicable special agreements or treaties.
( b ) *Application; Form; Filing.* Applications for authorization to navigate aircraft within the limits of defense areas shall be made by letter or telegram addressed to the appropriate entry control commander as indicated in § 761.9 with information copies to the Chief of Naval Operations, Commander in Chief, U.S. Atlantic (or Pacific) Fleet, as appropriate, and other local commanders who are known to be concerned. Applications shall include the following: ( 1 ) Type and serial number of aircraft (the number of aircraft in flight if a mass movement is involved), nationality and name of registered owner.
( 2 ) Name and rank of senior pilot. * (3) Number in crew. *(4) Number of passengers and whether military or civilian; include name (and rank) of distinguished passengers.
( 5 ) Purpose of flight.
( 6 ) Plan of flight route, including: ( i ) Point of origin of flight and its destination.
( ii ) Estimated date and times of arrival and departure at all airspaces covered by this part 761 including stops within the Trust Territory, when pertinent.
( 7 ) Radio call signs of aircraft and radio frequencies available.
( 8 ) Whether cameras are to be carried and whether they will be used. *(9) Whether arms are to be carried. *(10) Whether authorization to land as indicated in § 761.15(a) has been obtained. Note:
Information on those items marked with an asterisk (*) need not be reported when the aircraft will only overfly the areas covered by this part.
( c ) *Processing.* Authorization for individual entries or for multiple entries for a period not to exceed three months may be granted by an Entry Control Commander. Authorizations for multiple entries over a period to exceed three months and applications for group authorizations must be forwarded to the Chief of Naval Operations with appropriate comments and recommendations.
[41 FR 28958, July 14, 1976] Footnotes -
761.15
*See “Note” to this paragraph.
Case: 1:11-cv-09299 Document #: 41 Filed: 06/18/12 Page 1 of 16 PageID #:562
Case: 1:11-cv-09299 Document #: 41 Filed: 06/18/12 Page 2 of 16 PageID #:563
Case: 1:11-cv-09299 Document #: 41 Filed: 06/18/12 Page 3 of 16 PageID #:564
Case: 1:11-cv-09299 Document #: 41 Filed: 06/18/12 Page 4 of 16 PageID #:565
Case: 1:11-cv-09299 Document #: 41 Filed: 06/18/12 Page 5 of 16 PageID #:566
Case: 1:11-cv-09299 Document #: 41 Filed: 06/18/12 Page 6 of 16 PageID #:567
Case: 1:11-cv-09299 Document #: 41 Filed: 06/18/12 Page 7 of 16 PageID #:568
Case: 1:11-cv-09299 Document #: 41 Filed: 06/18/12 Page 8 of 16 PageID #:569
Case: 1:11-cv-09299 Document #: 41 Filed: 06/18/12 Page 9 of 16 PageID #:570
Case: 1:11-cv-09299 Document #: 41 Filed: 06/18/12 Page 10 of 16 PageID #:571
Case: 1:11-cv-09299 Document #: 41 Filed: 06/18/12 Page 11 of 16 PageID #:572
Case: 1:11-cv-09299 Document #: 41 Filed: 06/18/12 Page 12 of 16 PageID #:573
Case: 1:11-cv-09299 Document #: 41 Filed: 06/18/12 Page 13 of 16 PageID #:574
Case: 1:11-cv-09299 Document #: 41 Filed: 06/18/12 Page 14 of 16 PageID #:575
Case: 1:11-cv-09299 Document #: 41 Filed: 06/18/12 Page 15 of 16 PageID #:576
Case: 1:11-cv-09299 Document #: 41 Filed: 06/18/12 Page 16 of 16 PageID #:577
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

June 23, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

136058 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

AMET BATTLE, Persona Robert P. Young, Jr. l Representative Stephen J. Markman, of the ESTATE OF LAWRENCE BATTLE, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 136058 

 COA: 280663 
 Wayne CC: 06-627116-NF

TITAN INSURANCE COMPANY, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 27, 2008 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should now be reviewed by this Court. 

p0616 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

June 23, 2008 

 Clerk
#### In the Matter of the City of New York, Respondent, Relative to Acquiring Title to Real Property for Throgs Neck Bridge Approach. Bronx Beach and Pool, Inc., Appellant.

Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied, with $10 costs. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Valente, McNally, Stevens and Bastow, JJ.
1322.1305 Waivers. ( a ) The designee authorized to waive any requirement in FAR 22.13 if it is determined that the contract is essential to national security is set forth in CAM 1301.70.
( b ) The contracting officer must submit requests for waivers to the designee authorized under 1322.1305 (a). The request shall include a justification for the waiver and be available in electronic format.
Letters dated December 3, 2004 and December 9, 2004



 Exhibit 10.2.1 
 Cost Plus, Inc. 
 200 Fourth Street 
 Oakland,
California 94607 
 tel 510 893 7300 
 fax 510 893 3681

 www.costplusworldmarket.com 
 

 
 Friday, December 03, 2004 
 Mr. Jeff Kaspar 
 Deputy Port Director 
 2201 W.
Washington Street 
 P.O. Box 2094 
 Stockton, CA 95201

  

	 	Re:	Letter of Intent 

 Dear Jeff: 
 It was good to meet with you and discuss our mutual long term strategies. Per our agreement, this letter serves as a Letter of Intent on behalf of Cost Plus, Inc.

 Cost Plus would like to revise our existing lease to extend for five years through November 2009 with a thirty-six (36) month (November 2007) option
to give 90 day notice to terminate the lease or alternatively Cost Plus will have the option in November 2007 to convert the lease to a month to month. 
 Please contact myself or Steve Knight with any questions you may have. 
 Regards, 
  

					
		 		 	Accepted:
			
	/s/ Judy Soares	 		 	/s/ Richard Aschieris
	Judy Soares	 		 	Richard Aschieris, Port Director

  

	Cc:	Steve Knight 


	    	John Luttrell 








 PORT OF STOCKTON 
  

					
	Phone: (209) 946-0246	 	

	 	Fax: (209) 465-7244

 December 9, 2004 
 Ms. Judy Soares 
 Cost Plus, Inc. 
 200 Fourth
Street 
 Oakland, California 94607 
  

	Re:	Letter of Intent, Cost Plus Lease Extension 

 Dear Ms. Soares: 

The Port of Stockton is in receipt of your December 3, 2004 letter of intent to extent your lease. The Port is in agreement with your terms with the following
exception: 
 The Port would like to ensure that the term will extend through December 31, 2009 as opposed to November 2009. Cost Plus will
have an option to give 90 day notice to terminate the lease, or convert the lease to a month-to-month agreement on December 1, 2007. 
 If you are in
agreement with this amendment, please sign and return one copy of this letter. Your lease will be amended as stated. We appreciate your business and look forward to continuing our partnership for many years to come. 
  

					
	 Sincerely,
	 		 	Accepted,
			
	/s/ Jeff Kaspar	 		 	/s/ John Luttrell
	 Jeff Kaspar
 Deputy Port Director
 Properties and Environmental
	 		 	John Luttrell, CFO

 Post Office Box 2069 • Stockton, CA • _______ • E-mail: portmail@stocktonport.com

 Administration Office: 2201 West Washington Street • Stockton, CA • 95203 • Web Page: www.portofstockton.com
§ 989.38 Requirements for analysis abroad. ( a ) The EPF will generally perform the same functions for analysis of actions abroad that it performs in the United States. In addition to the requirements of 32 CFR part 187, the following Air Force specific rules apply:
( b ) For EAs dealing with global commons (geographic areas beyond the jurisdiction of the United States or any foreign nation), HQ USAF/A7CI will review actions that are above the MAJCOM approval authority. In this instance, approval authority refers to the same approval authority that would apply to an EA in the United States. The EPF documents a decision not to do an EIS.
( c ) For EISs dealing with the global commons, the EPF provides sufficient copies to HQ USAF/A7CI for the HQ USAF ESOHC review and AFCEE/TDB technical review. After ESOHC review, the EPF makes a recommendation as to whether the proposed draft EIS will be released as a draft EIS.
( d ) For environmental studies and environmental reviews, forward, when appropriate, environmental studies and reviews to HQ USAF/A7CI for coordination among appropriate federal agencies. HQ USAF/A7CI makes environmental studies and reviews available to the Department of State and other interested federal agencies, and, on request, to the United States public, in accordance with 32 CFR part 187. HQ USAF/A7CI also may inform interested foreign governments or furnish copies of studies, in accordance with 32 CFR part 187.
[64 FR 38129, July 15, 1999, as amended at 66 FR 16869, Mar. 28, 2001; 72 FR 37107, July 9, 2007]
II 

Calendar No. 196 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 690 

To extend the eligibility of redesignated areas as HUBZones from 3 years 

to 7 years. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 21, 2017 

Mr. CARDIN (for himself, Mr. RISCH, Mrs. SHAHEEN, Ms. HIRONO, Mr. VAN

HOLLEN, Mr. KING, Mr. BROWN, Mr. PETERS, and Ms. DUCKWORTH) 

introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 

Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship 

AUGUST 2, 2017 

Reported by Mr. RISCH, without amendment 

A BILL 

To extend the eligibility of redesignated areas as HUBZones 

from 3 years to 7 years. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘HUBZone Investment 

5 Protection Act’’. 


sradovich on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 690 RS

1 SEC. 2. MODIFICATION TO THE HUBZONE PROGRAM. 

2 Section 3(p)(4)(C) of the Small Business Act (15 

3 U.S.C. 632(p)(4)(C)) is amended by striking ‘‘until the 

4 later of’’ and all that follows and inserting ‘‘for the 7- 

5 year period following the date on which the census tract 

6 or nonmetropolitan county ceased to be so qualified.’’. 


sradovich on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS

sradovich on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 196 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 690 

A BILL 

To extend the eligibility of redesignated areas as 

HUBZones from 3 years to 7 years. 

AUGUST 2, 2017 

Reported without amendment 


sradovich on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-14-0000435 07-AUG-2014 08:07 AM
#### Sol Fursmidt v. Hotel Abbey Holding Corp.

Motion for leave to reargue appeal denied, with $10 costs. Concur — Rabin, J. P., Valente, McNally, Stevens and Bergan, JJ.
### §1377a. Report on aliens determined to have credible or reasonable fear of persecution or torture

#### (a) Semimonthly updates

Not later than 30 days after December 20, 2019, and updated semimonthly thereafter, the Director of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services shall make available, on a publicly accessible website in a downloadable, searchable, and sortable format, a report containing not less than the previous twelve months of semimonthly data on—

(1) the number of aliens determined to have a credible or reasonable fear of—

(A) persecution, as defined in section 1225(b)(1)(B)(v) of this title; or

(B) torture, as defined in section 208.30 of title 8, Code of Federal Regulations (as in effect on January 1, 2018);

(2) the total number of cases received by U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services to adjudicate credible or reasonable fear claims, as described in paragraph (1), and the total number of cases closed.

#### (b) Disaggregation of data

Such report shall also disaggregate the data described in subsection (a) with respect to the following subsets—

(1) claims submitted by aliens detained at a U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement family residential center;

(2) claims submitted by aliens organized by each subdivision of legal or administrative authority under which claims are reviewed; and

(3) the job series of the personnel reviewing the claims.

(Pub. L. 116–93, div. D, title IV, §403, Dec. 20, 2019, 133 Stat. 2524.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act, 2020, and also as part of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2020, and not as part of the Immigration and Nationality Act which comprises this chapter.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Application of Section

Pub. L. 117–103, div. F, title IV, §403, Mar. 15, 2022, 136 Stat. 334, provided that: "The terms and conditions of section 403 of the Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act, 2020 (division D of Public Law 116–93) [8 U.S.C. 1377a] shall apply to this Act [div. F of Pub. L. 117–103, see Tables for classification]."

#### Prior Provisions

Similar provisions were contained in the following prior appropriation act:

Pub. L. 116–260, div. F, title IV, §403, Dec. 27, 2020, 134 Stat. 1467.
### §593. Foreign standards; certification of compliance

Where the government of the country to which the shipment is to be made has standards or requirements as to condition of grapes and plums the Secretary may in addition to inspection and certification for compliance with the standards established or designated hereunder inspect and certify for determination as to compliance with the standards or requirements of such foreign government and may provide for special certificates in such cases.

(Pub. L. 86–687, §3, Sept. 2, 1960, 74 Stat. 734.)