alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### 1422.406-13 Semiannual enforcement reports.

PAM is responsible for submitting the report required by FAR 22.406-13 to DOL. In accordance with DOL memoranda, PAM requires bureaus to submit the required reports by April 15 and October 15 for the reporting periods of October 1 through March 31 and April 1 through September 30, respectively.
### §1187a. Provision of assistance to non-program countries

The Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation with the Secretary of State, shall provide assistance in a risk-based manner to countries that do not participate in the visa waiver program under section 1187 of this title to assist those countries in—

(1) submitting to Interpol information about the theft or loss of passports of citizens or nationals of such a country; and

(2) issuing, and validating at the ports of entry of such a country, electronic passports that are fraud-resistant, contain relevant biographic and biometric information (as determined by the Secretary of Homeland Security), and otherwise satisfy internationally accepted standards for electronic passports.

(Pub. L. 114–113, div. O, title II, §208, Dec. 18, 2015, 129 Stat. 2995.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Visa Waiver Program Improvement and Terrorist Travel Prevention Act of 2015, and also as part of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2016, and not as part of the Immigration and Nationality Act which comprises this chapter.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Synthetic Blood International, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-QSB for the period ended July 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert W. Nicora, President and Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                   |  |                                      
|------------------ |  | -------------------------------------
|September 19, 2007 |  | /s/ Robert W. Nicora                 
|                   |  | Robert W. Nicora                     
|                   |  | President and Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Synthetic Blood
International, Inc. and will be retained by Synthetic Blood International, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Commissioner of Welfare of the City of New York v. Michael Janicki.

Motion for leave to appeal as a poor person denied. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, Eager and Bastow, JJ.
### §6501. Purposes

It is the purpose of this chapter—

(1) to establish national standards governing the marketing of certain agricultural products as organically produced products;

(2) to assure consumers that organically produced products meet a consistent standard; and

(3) to facilitate interstate commerce in fresh and processed food that is organically produced.

(Pub. L. 101–624, title XXI, §2102, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 3935.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Short Title

Pub. L. 101–624, title XXI, §2101, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 3935, provided that: "This title [enacting this chapter] may be cited as the 'Organic Foods Production Act of 1990'."
#### 1316.203 Fixed-price contracts with economic price adjustment.
Exhibit 31.1**Certification****Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes — Oxley Act of 2002**I, Adrian Ma, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Emerson Radio Corp.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;andc) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors andthe audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;andb) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date: November 14, 2007 /s/  Adrian Ma   Adrian Ma   Chief Executive Officer   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 302 has been provided to EmersonRadio Corp. and will be retained by Emerson Radio Corp. and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.
22
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Harry Brooks, Appellant.

[834 NYS2d 527]

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Barbara E Newman, J.), rendered January 13, 2005, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of two counts of sodomy in the first degree, three counts of sexual abuse in the first degree and two counts of endangering the welfare of a child, and sentencing him, as a persistent violent felony offender, to an aggregate term of 50 years to life, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was not against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis for disturbing the jury’s determinations concerning identification and credibility *(see People v Bleakley,*69 NY2d 490, 495 [1987]).

The court properly permitted the victims’ grandmother to make an in-court identification of defendant, where she had not participated in any pretrial identification procedures, but had spontaneously recognized defendant when she inadvertently *429saw Rim in custody in a courthouse hallway earlier in the trial. The only preserved issue in this regard is the propriety of the court’s discretionary denial of defendant’s request for an in-court lineup. We conclude that the court properly exercised its discretion in denying that request *(see People v Benjamin,*155 AD2d 375 [1989], *lv denied*75 NY2d 867 [1990]). The record, including the midtrial hearing that the court conducted after learning of the witness’s courthouse encounter with defendant, establishes her ability to make a reliable identification. Defendant’s claim that he was entitled, as a matter of due process, to an in-court lineup or preclusion of any in-court identification by this witness, is unpreserved and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review this claim, we would reject it since the witness’s spontaneous recognition of defendant and her in-court identification were reliable.

The court properly exercised its discretion in ruling that, if defendant’s wife were to testify as an alibi witness, she could be cross-examined, with strict limitations and an accompanying jury instruction, regarding her possible bias in remaining loyal to defendant through his long incarceration on a rape conviction *(see People v Quinones,*26 AD3d 167 [2006], *lv denied*6 NY3d 837 [2006]; *People v Marrero,*12 AD3d 172 [2004], *lv denied*4 NY3d 746 [2004]). Such cross-examination, which never occurred because defendant’s wife did not testify, would not have constituted impeachment of an alibi witness by way of a defendant’s criminal record. The probative value of such cross-examination would, in the particular circumstances presented, have outweighed its prejudicial effect. To the extent that defendant is raising a constitutional claim, such claim is unpreserved and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review this claim, we would find that the court’s ruling did not violate defendant’s right to present a defense *(see Crane v Kentucky,*476 US 683, 689-690 [1986]).

We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence. Concur— Tom, J.P., Andrias, Buckley, Gonzalez and Malone, JJ.
§ 750.36 Time limitations. ( a ) *Administrative claim.* Every claim filed against the United States under the FTCA must be presented in writing within 2 years after the claim accrues. 28 U.S.C. 2401(b). Federal law determines the date of accrual. A claim accrues when the claimant discovers or reasonably should have discovered the existence of the act giving rise to the claim. In computing the statutory time period, the day of the incident is excluded and the day the claim was presented included.
( b ) *Amendments.* Upon timely filing of an amendment to a pending claim, the DON shall have 6 months to make a final disposition of the claim as amended, and the claimant's option to file suit under 28 U.S.C. 2675(a) shall not accrue until 6 months after the presentment of an amendment. 28 CFR 14.2(c).
( c ) *Suits.* A civil action is barred unless suit is filed against the United States not later than 6 months after the date of mailing of notice of final denial of the claim. 28 U.S.C. 2401(b). The failure of the DON to make final disposition of a claim within 6 months after it is presented shall, at the option of the claimant any time thereafter, be deemed a final denial of the claim. 28 U.S.C. 2675(a).
REGULATORY EVALUATION

Directorate Identifier: 201O-NM-141-AD

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a "significant regulatory action"?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific

requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of

transportation?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.9

Certification of Chief Financial Officer

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

    In connection with the Annual Report of 3Si Holdings, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-KSB for the period ended June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

    (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

    (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





Dated: October 21, 2002         By: /s/ Frank W. Backes
                                   -----------------------------------------
                                   Frank W. Backes, Chief Technical Officer,
                                   Chief Financial Officer and Director
#### § 516.18 Litigation alleging individual liability.

See subpart D for procedures to follow when DA personnel, as a result of performance of official duties, are either sued in their individual capacities or face criminal charges.
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 98-2064

___________

Harold Leroy Page; Jerry D. *

Ashburn; Steven Bruce Hepperle, *

*

Appellants, *

*

v. *

*

Eldora Boys Training School, sued * Appeal from the United States

as (1970 to 1974...Superintendent * District Court for the

of Eldora Training School for Boys); * Northern District of Iowa.

Larry Lukin, sued as Larry Lukin of *

Eldora Training School for Boys; * [UNPUBLISHED]

Richard Turner, sued as Ex-Attorney *

General Richard Turner; Robert D. Ray, *

sued as Ex-Gov. Robert D. Ray; *

Unknown Superintendent, sued as *

I.S.M.F. Superintendent; Warden *

Haugh, sued as I.M.R. Warden Haugh; *

Director of Iowa Department of *

Corrections, sued as Director of Corr.; *

Thomas Miller, sued as (1997...Tom *

Miller, Atty. Gen.); Terry Branstad, *

Governor, sued as Terry E. Branstad, *

Gov.; State of Iowa; John Doe, sued as *

John Doe #4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, *

13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, and 20, were *

Cottage Manager&s, cottage Staff, *

Health Center Staff, and Counselors *

at the Eldora Training School for Boy&s; *
The Honorable Edward J. McManus, United States District Judge for the

1

Northern District of Iowa.

-2-

Mary Voss, a school teacher, at the *

Eldora Training School for Boys, *

*

Appellees. *

___________

 Submitted: May 5, 1998

 Filed: May 8, 1998

___________

Before FAGG, BEAM, and HANSEN, Circuit Attorneys.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Iowa inmates Harold Leroy Page, Jerry D. Ashburn, and Steven Bruce Hepperle

appeal the district court&s order dismissing their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Having

1

carefully reviewed the record, we affirm the judgment of the district court for the

reasons stated in its order opinion. See 8th Cir. R. 47A(a).

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
### Part V—Adjustment and Change of Status
#### 1301.602 Contracting officers.
#### § 552.77 Suspension approval.

The installation commander will personally approve all cases in which solicitation privileges have been denied or suspended for cause. This includes agents, companies, or other commercial enterprises. Authority to temporarily suspend solicitation privileges for 30 days or less while an investigation is conducted may be delegated by the commander to the installation solicitation officer or other designee. Exception to this time frame must be approved by The Adjutant General (DAAG-PSI) or by the overseas commander. The commander will make the final determination.
Exhibit 10.1

Steven A. Schmidt

Offer of Re-employment

POSITION:

President & Chief Operating Officer, reporting to Terry Paul, CEO.

COMPENSATION PACKAGE:

Based on a salary of $320,000 per year, you will receive bi-weekly salary compensation of $12,307.69, to be reviewed periodically by the Board of Directors. 

RESTRICTED STOCK:

You will be awarded a restricted stock grant equal to $100,000 at the April 26, 2006 closing price of the Company’s stock on the NASDAQ stock market as reported in the Midwest Edition of the Wall Street Journal.  The grant vests over four years (25% per year).

INCENTIVE PLAN:

You will be eligible to participate in the Company’s cash bonus plan.  The plan allows you to share directly in the Company’s success by offering an opportunity for a bonus of up to 100% of your base salary as a result of the growth in profit and operating revenues.  All bonus plans are subject to approval by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors and are subject to change.

BENEFITS PLAN:

Our comprehensive benefits plan (summary enclosed), which includes health, life and disability coverage, 401k with a generous match of 75% of your contribution up to 6% of income (federal limits may apply) and other excellent health and welfare benefits.

In addition, should health coverage with your current employer expire before you are eligible for such coverage under our plans (which is May 1, 2006) we will proactively work with you to prevent any lapse in coverage.

SERP:

The Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (SERP) allows participants to defer additional salary (up to an additional 20%) on a tax-deferred basis, over and above dollars you may already be deferring in our 401(k) Plan.  This allows you the opportunity to receive the full 4.5% company match on a combined basis on those contributions that you make that exceed the 401(k) maximum.






PERSONAL TIME OFF:

As detailed in the benefits summary, we offer a personal time off benefit.  As an experienced senior leader, you will be advanced one week (40 hours) of PTO upon joining Renaissance and we will use your original date of hire to determine your biweekly PTO accrual.

SIGNING BONUS:

Upon rejoining Renaissance, you will be given a $35,000 sign-on bonus.  This will be paid on the first regular pay date after you rejoin, which is April 27, 2006.  In exchange you will be surrendering your unused stock options and agree that such options, and all exercise and other rights you may have with respect to the options, shall be canceled and become null and void.

NON-COMPETE/

CONFIDENTIALITY:

This offer is contingent upon your execution of our standard confidentiality and non-compete agreements on or before your first day of re-employment.

This offer is dependent on your acceptance prior to April 10,2006 and commencement of 

employment on April 26, 2006.

I hereby accept the offer of employment.

          /s/ Steven A. Schmidt     4-7-06        

Steven Schmidt (Signature and Date)

Agreed to this 10th day of April.

/s/ Terrance D. Paul                              

(Signature, Terrance D. Paul, CEO)
_______________________________________ __ ___________________ ____________________ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

December 11, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r Marilyn Kell y Maura D. Corriga n 135893(77)(81) Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman,
J ustices

MARKELL VANSLEMBROUCK, a Minor, by his Next Friend KIMBERLY A. VANSLEMBROUCK, and KIMBERLY A. VANSLEMBROUCK, Individually, Plaintiffs-Appellees, SC: 135893 v COA: 273551 Oakland CC: 2006-074585-NH ANDREW JAY HALPERIN, M.D., MICHIGAN INSTITUT E OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, P. C., and WILLIAM BEAUMONT HOSPITAL, Defendants-Appellants.

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion by plaintiffs-appellees for extension of the time for filing their brief on appeal is considered and it is GRANTED. The motion by Livonia Family Physicians, P.C. and others for leave to file a brief amicus

curiae is considered and it is GRANTED.

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 11, 2008

Clerk
###### Editorial Note on Part 724

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 724 appear at 65 FR 62616, Oct. 19, 2000.

#### § 724.204 Eligibility for naval discharge review.

Any former member of the Naval Service, eligible for review under reference (a) or surviving spouse, next of kin or legal representative, shall upon submission of an application be afforded a review of the member's discharge from the Naval Service as provided in §§ 724.205 and 724.206. Discharge review may also be initiated on the motion of the NDRB (See § 724.220).
### §950aa. Additional powers and duties

The Secretary shall—

(1) provide advice and guidance to electric borrowers under this chapter concerning the effective and prudent use by such borrowers of the investment authority under section 940b of this title to promote rural development;

(2) provide technical advice, troubleshooting, and guidance concerning the operation of programs or systems that receive assistance under this chapter;

(3) establish and administer various pilot projects through electric and telephone borrowers that the Secretary determines are useful or necessary, and recommend specific rural development projects for rural areas;

(4) act as an information clearinghouse and conduit to provide information to electric and telephone borrowers under this chapter concerning useful and effective rural development efforts that such borrowers may wish to apply in their areas of operation and concerning State, regional, or local plans for long-term rural economic development;

(5) provide information to electric and telephone borrowers under this chapter concerning the eligibility of such borrowers to apply for financial assistance, loans, or grants from other Federal agencies and non-Federal sources to enable such borrowers to expand their rural development efforts; and

(6) promote local partnerships and other coordination between borrowers under this chapter and community organizations, States, counties, or other entities, to improve rural development.

(May 20, 1936, ch. 432, title V, §501, as added Pub. L. 101–624, title XXIII, §2345, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 4029; amended Pub. L. 102–237, title VII, §703(c), Dec. 13, 1991, 105 Stat. 1881; Pub. L. 103–354, title II, §235(a)(12), (13), Oct. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 3221; Pub. L. 104–127, title VII, §781(b), Apr. 4, 1996, 110 Stat. 1151.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1996—Par. (7). Pub. L. 104–127 struck out par. (7) which read as follows: "administer a Rural Business Incubator Fund (as established under section 950aa–1 of this title) that shall provide technical assistance, advice, loans, or capital to business incubator programs or for the creation or operation of small business incubators in rural areas."

1994—Pub. L. 103–354 struck out "of REA Administrator" at end of section catchline and substituted "Secretary" for "Administrator" in introductory provisions and par. (3).

1991—Pars. (6) to (8). Pub. L. 102–237 inserted "and" at end of par. (6), redesignated par. (8) as (7), and struck out former par. (7) which read as follows: "review the advice and recommendations of the Rural Educational Opportunities Board as established under section 601(f); and".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1991 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 102–237 effective as if included in the provision of the Food, Agriculture, Conservation, and Trade Act of 1990, Pub. L. 101–624, to which the amendment relates, see section 1101(b)(8) of Pub. L. 102–237, set out as a note under section 1421 of this title.
#### 1341.201 Policy.

The designee authorized to enter into a contract pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 8287 (regarding shared energy savings, including cogeneration) is set forth in CAM 1301.70.