alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Angeles
Park Communities, Ltd. 1997 Year-End 10-KSB and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such 10-KSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000317969
<NAME> ANGELES PARK COMMUNITIES, LTD.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                             531
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       56
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                           5,968
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,617
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   2,153
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                          4,872
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (3,015)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     2,153
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,076
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,398
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 495
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       183
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    12.03<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet.
<F2>Multiplier is 1.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
#### Ruben Torres, as Administrator of the Estate of Carlos Torres, Deceased, Respondent, v City of New York et al., Appellants.

[834 NYS2d 164]

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Janice L. Bowman, J.), entered on or about October 11, 2005, which, upon renewal, denied defendants’ motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the motion granted. The Clerk is directed to enter an amended judgment in favor of defendants dismissing the complaint.

Although we previously reinstated the liability verdict against defendants (306 AD2d 191 [2003]), rejecting defendants’ contention that the action should have been dismissed on the ground that the City had no prior written notice of the alleged roadway defect *(see*Administrative Code of City of NY § 7-201 [c] [2]), we have since had occasion to reexamine our holding on the previous appeal—that prior notice of a roadway defect is not a necessary precondition of municipal liability attributable to such a defect where the defect results from the City’s affirmative negligence, even where the defect is not immediately apparent but develops over an extended period—and in *Bielecki v City of New York*(14 AD3d 301 [2005]) explicitly overruled that holding, concluding instead that prior notice pursuant to Administrative Code § 7-201 (c) (2) is necessary where the alleged defect is not immediately apparent at the conclusion of the City’s roadway work, but develops subsequently. In view of *Bielecki,*defendants’ motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, appropriately renewed prior to the trial on the issue of damages directed in our prior order, should now be granted. There is no ground to distinguish this case from *Bielecki.*Indeed, according to plaintiff’s expert, the complained-of roadway depressions, although traceable to the City’s negligence in repairing the roadway, did not appear immediately, but developed gradually as inadequately paved cobblestones became exposed, loose and displaced *(see*306 AD2d at 192). Concur— Mazzarelli, J.P., Saxe, Sullivan, McGuire and Kavanagh, JJ.
Consent of Independent Accountants





The Board of Directors
Canisco Resources, Inc.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(No. 333-70907) on Form S-8 and in the Registration Statement (No. 333-55739)
on Form S-4 of Canisco Resources, Inc. of our reports dated July 1, 1999,
relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Canisco Resources, Inc. and
subsidiaries as of March 31, 1999 and 1998, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, shareholders' equity, and cash flows and related
financial statement schedule for each of the years in the three-year period
ended March 31, 1999, which reports appear in the March 31, 1999 annual
report on Form 10-K of Canisco Resources, Inc. which is incorporated by
reference in the Registration Statements.






KPMG LLP



Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
July 14, 1999






Exhibit 23
### §8787. Hard white wheat development program

#### (a) Definitions

In this section:

#### (1) Eligible hard white wheat seed

The term "eligible hard white wheat seed" means hard white wheat seed that, as determined by the Secretary, is—

(A) certified;

(B) of a variety that is suitable for the State in which the seed will be planted;

(C) rated at least superior with respect to quality; and

(D) specifically approved under a seed establishment program established by the State Department of Agriculture and the State Wheat Commission of the 1 or more States in which the seed will be planted.

#### (2) Program

The term "program" means the hard white wheat development program established under subsection (b)(1).

#### (3) Secretary

The term "Secretary" means the Secretary of Agriculture, in consultation with the State Departments of Agriculture and the State Wheat Commissions of the States in regions in which hard white wheat is produced, as determined by the Secretary.

#### (b) Establishment

#### (1) In general

Subject to the availability of appropriations, the Secretary shall establish a hard white wheat development program in accordance with paragraph (2) to promote the establishment of hard white wheat as a viable market class of wheat in the United States by encouraging production of at least 240,000,000 bushels of hard white wheat by 2012.

#### (2) Payments

#### (A) In general

Subject to subparagraphs (B) and (C) and subsection (c), if funds are made available for any of the 2009 through 2012 crops of hard white wheat, the Secretary shall make available incentive payments to producers of those crops.

#### (B) Acreage limitation

The Secretary shall carry out subparagraph (A) subject to a regional limitation determined by the Secretary on the number of acres for which payments may be received that takes into account planting history and potential planting, but does not exceed a total of 2,900,000 acres or the equivalent volume of production based on a yield of 50 bushels per acre.

#### (C) Payment limitations

Payments to producers on a farm described in subparagraph (A) shall be—

(i) in an amount that is not less than $0.20 per bushel; and

(ii) in an amount that is not less than $2.00 per acre for planting eligible hard white wheat seed.

#### (c) Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section $35,000,000 for the period of fiscal years 2009 through 2012.

(Pub. L. 110–234, title I, §1612, May 22, 2008, 122 Stat. 1019; Pub. L. 110–246, §4(a), title I, §1612, June 18, 2008, 122 Stat. 1664, 1747.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Pub. L. 110–234 and Pub. L. 110–246 enacted identical sections. Pub. L. 110–234 was repealed by section 4(a) of Pub. L. 110–246.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Enactment of this section and repeal of Pub. L. 110–234 by Pub. L. 110–246 effective May 22, 2008, the date of enactment of Pub. L. 110–234, see section 4 of Pub. L. 110–246, set out as a note under section 8701 of this title.
#### 1313.201 General.

DOC employees, other than warranted contracting officers, must be delegated micro-purchase authority by the designee set forth in CAM 1301.70 according to FAR 1.603-3(b), and must be trained pursuant to CAM 1313.301.
UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549



FORM 6-K

REPORT OF FOREIGN PRIVATE ISSUER

PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-16 OR 15d-16

UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934



Dated November 14, 2006



Commission File Number: 001-14666



MITTAL STEEL COMPANY N.V.

(Translation of registrants name into English)



15th Floor, Hofplein 20

3032 AC Rotterdam

The Netherlands

(Address of principal executive offices)



Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports under cover Form 20-F or Form 40-F.



Form 20-FxForm 40-Fo



Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1): _____



Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7): _____



Indicate by check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the information contained in this Form is also thereby furnishing the information to the Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.



YesoNox



If Yes marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the registrant in connection with Rule 12g3-2(b): 82-________







| |  | 
| |  | 











| |  | 
| |  | 





---







On November 14, 2006, Mittal Steel Company N.V. issued the press release attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1.



Exhibit List



|Exhibit No.  | Description                                                                                                                      | 
|------------ | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|Exhibit 99.1 | Press release dated November 14, 2006, announcing the early redemption of Arcelor Mittal's OCEANEs and reiterating merger terms.







| |  | 
| |  | 













| |  | 
| |  | 





---







SIGNATURES



Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.



Date: November 14, 2006



| | By: | /s/ Henk Scheffer
| | --- | -----------------
| |     | Name:            
| |     | Title:           







| |  | 
| |  | 













| |  | 
| |  | 





---







Exhibit Index



|Exhibit No.  | Description                                                                                                                      | 
|------------ | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|Exhibit 99.1 | Press release dated November 14, 2006, announcing the early redemption of Arcelor Mittal's OCEANEs and reiterating merger terms.









| |  | 
| |  | 













| |  | 
| |  |
### §2304. Disclaimer of intention to prohibit normal dealing

Nothing in this chapter shall prevent handlers and producers from selecting their customers and suppliers for any reason other than a producer's membership in or contract with an association of producers, nor require a handler to deal with an association of producers.

(Pub. L. 90–288, §5, Apr. 16, 1968, 82 Stat. 95.)
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 23, 2015

s1216 

# Order

Clerk December 23, 2015

151524

SBC HEALTH MIDWEST, INC.,

Petitioner

- Appellee,

v SC: 151524

COA: 319428

Tax Tribunal: 00

- 416230

CITY OF KENTWOOD,

Respondent

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 19, 2015

jud gment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is GRANTED. The parties shall

address whether the tax exemptions set forth under MCL 211.9(1)(a) are available to a

for

- profit educational institution.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the
Annual Report of Matrix Energy Services Corporation (the "Company"), on Form
10-K, as amended, for the period ending September, 30, 2003 (the "Report"), I,
Joe Bill Bennett, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.



/s/Joe Bill Bennett
------------------------------------------
Joe Bill Bennett, Chief Executive Officer

January 13, 2004



<PAGE>


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the
Annual Report of Matrix Energy Services Corporation (the "Company"), on Form
10-K, as amended, for the period ending September, 30, 2003 (the "Report"), I,
Mark S. Zouvas, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.



/s/Mark S. Zouvas
-----------------------------------
Mark S. Zouvas, Chief Financial Officer

January 13, 2004
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Dynamic Materials Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Yvon Pierre Cariou, Presidentand Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(i)          The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

(ii)         The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

August 3, 2006
|        | /s/ Yvon Pierre  Cariou                |
|--------|----------------------------------------|
|   | Yvon Pierre  Cariou                    |
|   | President and  Chief Executive Officer |
|   | of Dynamic  Materials Corporation      |

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to Dynamic Materials Corporation and will be retained by DynamicMaterials Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.

 

----
<PAGE>
                                                       Exhibit 24


                         PP&L RESOURCES, INC.
                              PP&L, INC.

                         1997 ANNUAL REPORT
               TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             ON FORM 10-K

                          POWER OF ATTORNEY

	The undersigned directors of PP&L Resources, Inc. and 
PP&L, Inc., both Pennsylvania corporations, which are to file 
with the Securities and Exchange Commission, Washington, D.C., 
under the provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as 
amended, their 1997 Annual Report on Form 10-K, do hereby appoint 
William F. Hecht, John R. Biggar and Robert J. Grey their true 
and lawful attorney, and each of them their true and lawful 
attorney, with power to act without the other and with full power 
of substitution and resubstitution, to execute for them and in 
their names said Form 10-K Report and any and all amendments 
thereto, whether said amendments add to, delete from or otherwise 
alter said Form 10-K Report, or add or withdraw any exhibits or 
schedules to be filed therewith and any and all instruments in 
connection therewith.  The undersigned hereby grant to said 
attorneys and each of them full power and authority to do and 
perform in the name of and on behalf of the undersigned, and in 
any and all capacities, any act and thing whatsoever required or 
necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully and to 
all intents and purposes as the undersigned might do, hereby 
ratifying and approving the acts of said attorneys and each of 
them.
	IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have hereunto set 
their hands and seals this 27th day of February, 1998.


/s/ E. Allen Deaver         L.S.  /s/ Clifford L. Jones          L.S.
E. Allen Deaver                    Clifford L. Jones



/s/ Nance K. Dicciani       L.S.  /s/ Ruth Leventhal             L.S.
Nance K. Dicciani                  Ruth Leventhal



/s/ William J. Flood        L.S.  /s/ Marilyn Ware Lewis         L.S.
William J. Flood                   Marilyn Ware Lewis



/s/ Elmer D. Gates          L.S.  /s/ Frank A. Long              L.S.
Elmer D. Gates                     Frank A. Long



/s/ William F. Hecht        L.S.  /s/ Norman Robertson           L.S.
William F. Hecht                   Norman Robertson



/s/ Stuart Heydt            L.S.
Stuart Heydt
1 The Honorable Fernando J. Gaitan, Jr ., Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 06-2097

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Western District of Missouri. Donald E. Tooley, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: July 3, 2007 Filed: July 9, 2007

___________ Before RILEY, MAGILL, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Donald E. Tooley (Tooley) appeals the sentence the district court 1 imposed following his guilty plea conviction for bei ng a felon in possession of ammunition, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1) and 924(e). Finding Tooley was an armed career criminal, the district court sentenced hi m to the statutory minimum of 15 years in prison. See 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(1); U.S.S.G. § 4B1. 4. Tooley’s counsel has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief under Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967).-2- Counsel challenges one of the predicate offenses underlying Tooley’s armed-careercriminal status, arguing that stealing a motor vehicle should not automatically be deemed a “violent felony.” See 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(2)(B)(ii) (defining “violent felony” as a crime that is punishable by imprisonmen t for more than one year and “otherwise involves conduct that presents a serious poten tial risk of physical injury to another”). Tooley has filed a pro se “Motion to Su spend Brief and Briefing Schedule, Withdraw Counsel and Appoint Appellate Counsel,” in which he argues counsel below was ineffective, and seeks appointment of ne w appellate counsel. We reject these arguments, and affirm the sentence.
Reviewing de novo, seeUnited States v. Burling , 420 F.3d 745, 749 (8th Cir. 2005), we conclude that counsel’s challenge is unavailing. See United States v. Barbour , 395 F.3d 826, 827-28 (8th Cir. 2005) (ruling under controlling precedent, a Kansas vehicle theft is violent felony with in meaning of § 924(e)). As for Tooley’s pro se argument, we a dhere to the general rule that Tooley must raise his claim of ineffective assistance of counsel in a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 proceeding, where the record can be properly developed. SeeUnited States v. Hughes , 330 F.3d 1068, 1069 (8th Cir. 2003).
Having reviewed the record i ndependently under Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), we find no non-frivolous issues. We grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and we affirm. We also deny Tooley’s pending motion.

______________________________
-       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2024-09-11T15:21:41-0400
      - Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401
      - Government Publishing Office
      - Government Publishing Office attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by Government Publishing Office
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Eugene Combs, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered August 18, 1976, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Judgment reversed, on the law and as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, and new trial ordered (see *People v Byrdsong,*58 AD2d 877, which involved the appeal of the appellant’s codefendant). Shapiro, J. P., Cohalan, Hargett and O’Connor, JJ., concur.
### §§61 to 65. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 61, R.S. 2032, related to continuation of laws then in force.

Section 62, R.S. 2033, related to enforcement of laws by former Secretary of War.

Section 63, acts Mar. 3, 1879, ch. 182, §2, 20 Stat. 402; Feb. 1, 1888, ch. 4, §1, 25 Stat. 9; July 1, 1898, ch. 546, 30 Stat. 640, related to claims for pay or bounty.

Section 64, act July 1, 1902, ch. 1351, 32 Stat. 556, related to retained bounty fund.

Section 65, R.S. §2037, related to wives and children of colored soldiers.