# GE Energy Bruce Randall Project Manager ISO 9001 Accredited Quality System



### PARTICULATE MAnER EMISSIONS COMPLIANCE STUDY

PerformedAt 

### Minnkota Power Cooperative M.R. Young Station Unit2 Center, North Dakota
TestDate 

### May 7,2008

Report No. 

### GE Energy Management Services, Inc. Report M22A0427B

Report Submittal Date 

### June 13, 2008

GE Energy Management Services, Inc 1301 Corporate Center Drive

- Suite 177 Eagan, MN 55121 T 651-686-0700 USA F 651-686-4434

# GE Energy

TABLE OFCONTENTS

CERTIFICATION SHEET i 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 RV And discussion OF RESULTS : 1



### . l'

# 1'~.'Sft3.0TEST URES 1 /

..t<,. 

### I>:;; 3.1 Desc . n of Sampling Location :: 2 f,r,' " .,,,

## ",,'i.? Filtera M Determination 

### by USEPA Method 17 2**~~~;~~c1e** Determination by Electrozone (Elzone) Technique 2 4.0**CR\?Atl~** ASS NCE PROCEDURES 3

. 'Yr,,';'"**,,~'** .!

.**'&.O~@,..RESU~::,UMMARV** 4



### . "t

..... >. if**~I'C.I'~**



## .**:ARgE.t:H~I~,_~** 

## ...

. ····::ProJect Participants 6 Process Operating Data : 7 Sampling Train Diagram 13 Calculation Nomenclature and Formulas 14 Reference Method Test Data and Results 18 Laboratory Analytical Data 24 Calibration Data , 38 Field Data Sheets , , 46

# GE Energy

CERTIFICATION SHEET Having reviewed the test program described in this report, I hereby certify the data, information and results in this report to be accurate and true according to the methods and procedures used.

. Data collected under the supervision of others is included in this report, and is presumed to have been gathered in accordance with recognized standards. 

### GE ENERGY MANAGEMENT SERVICES,INC.

Bruce Randall Emissions Testing ServiceDirector

© 2008, General Electric Company. pJl rights reserved. The contents ofthis document are the propertyofGeneral Electric Company. No partofthis work maybe reproduced or transmitted in anyform or by anymeans, exceptas permitted in written license agreement with General Electric Company. General Electric Compony has made everyreasonable attemptto ensure the completeness andaccuracyofthis document The GElogo is a registered trademarkofGeneral Electric Company.

1

# GE Energy

PARTICULATE EMISSIONS COMPLIANCE STUDY Performed For

. Minnkota Power Cooperative At The M.R. Young Station Unit2 Center, North Dakota May 7,2008

1.0 INTRODUCTION GE Energy Management Services, Inc., (uGE Energy"l performed a Particulate Matter (PMl emission compliance test program on Unit 2 at the M.R. Young Station of Minnkota Power Cooperative (Minnkotal near Center, North Dakota on May 7, 2008. The tests were authorized by and performed for Minnkota.
The purpose of this test program was to determine emission rates of PM, and Particulate Matter less than 10 microns in diameter (PMlOl during normal operating conditions. These tests were performed concurrently with. a PM correlation test program for the PM Continuous Emissions Monitoring System installed on Unit 2. The results of the correlation test program are presented under separate cover.

2.0 SUMMARV AND DISCUSSION OF RESULTS
The results of the test program are summarized in the following table:

2 PM

. PMlO 

### O.009Ib/MM Btu 28.7Ib/hr O.llb/MMBtu 315.1Ib/hr



### . Complete test results summaries are presented in Section 5.0.

3.0 TEST PROCEDURES All testing, sampling, analytical, and calibration procedures used for this test program were performed as described in the Title 40, 

## Code of 

## Federal Regulations, Part 60 (40CFR60l, Appendix A, Method 17 and.the latest revisions thereof. Where applicable, the 

## Quality Assurance Handbook for Air Pollution Measurement Systems, Volume III,

GE Energy Project M22A04278 

### 1

# GE Energy

Stationary Source Specific Methods, United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA!600/4-77-027b was used to determine the precise procedures.
3.1 Description of Sampling Location The sample location at Unit 2 was a vertical circular stack equipped with multiple sample ports. The ports used for this program were located 5.8 duct diameters upstream, and 12.8 duct diameters downstream from the nearest disturbance in flow. Sample point location was determined in accordance with USEPAMethod 1.
3.2 Filterable PM Determination by USEPA Method 17 This method is applicable for the determination of filterable (front-half or dry-catch! PM emissions from stationary sources where PM concentrations are known to be independent of temperature 

## overthe normal range of temperatures characteristic of emissions from a specified source category. Sample was drawn from the source through a button hook nozzle, an in-stack filter and a stainless steel-lined. The probe was followed in series by: an impinger train immersed in an ice bath, a pump and a dry test meter. Velocity pressures were determined during sampling with a calibrated S-type pitot tube and inclined manometer. All temperatures were measured using Ktype thermocouples with calibrated digital temperature indicators.
The entire sample system was checked for leaks prior to**sampling~** 

### At the conclusion 

### of-**samp1jng~thE-~tire~sampl-e:>ystem~0$--check-ed-f"Of-i~Gks-et--er-veetltlffl~~f€et"€r---~- .~_-~~~-** **_~** 

### than or equal to the highest sample vacuum observed during the test run. All sample contact surfaces of the upstream of the filter were rinsed and brushed with HPLC reagent-grade acetone. These washes were placed in sealed and marked containers for analysis. The filter was recovered to a Petri dish.
All sample recovery was performed at the test site. All final sample analyses were performed by GE Energy personnel at the GE Energy laboratory in Eagan, Minnesota.
3.3 Particle Size Determination by Electrozone (Elzone) Technique Upon completion of Method 17 analysis. samples were tested for particle size by the Elzone technique. Particles suspended in a conductive fluid flow serially through an

.orifice under differential pressure. Electrodes are immersed on each side of the orifice. As each particle passes through the aperture. it replaces its own volume of electrolyte within the aperture. momentarily changing the resistance value between the electrodes. This change produces a voltage pulse of short duration having a magnitude proportional to particle 

## volume. The resulting series of pulses is electronically amplified, scaled, and counted. Raw data processing is performed by a PDP-1103 minicomputer in such a manner that a population histogram of 128 or 256 channels of information can be acquired. Acquired data is conditioned by applying calibration, extrapolation. volume (weight!. or area 

## conversions. Normalization of size and quantity axes to the types of scales required by the researcher is also possible.

GE Energy Project M22A0427B 

### 2

# GE Energy

. The conductive particle suspension medium is an important consideration in

Electrozone technology. Typically, aqueous isotonic saline (0.9% by weight) or a 4% by weight sodium pyrophosphate is used as a dispersing and particle suspension medium. For certain analyses that cannot be run in an· aqueous medium, 4% weight/volume lithium chloride in isopropyl alcohol is effective.

4.0 QUALlTV ASSURANCE PROCEDURES GE Energy recognizes the previously described test methods to be very technique oriented and attempts to minimize all factors which can increase error by implementing its Quality Assurance Program into every segment of its testing activities.

GE Energy Project M22A0427B 

## 3

# GE Energy

5.0 TEST RESULTS SUMMARV

Company: Minnkota Plant: MRYoung Unit: Unit 2

est Run Number 1 2 

### 3 ate

. 5/07/2008 5/07/2008 5/07/2008 Start Time 08:20 09:06 10:13 End Time 09:38 10:27 11:33 otal Sample Time (Min): 60.0 60.0 60.0 verage Duct Temp (oF): 172.5 175.4 174.3 verage Duct Vel (ft/sec): 63.74 62.57 63.94 Moisture Content (Bws): 0.197/ 0.196 0.198 02 Content l%voll: 7.3 7.4 7.4**~._~.-"".,.........,..."-~.~.** -**~-ontent(%vol)~.** 

### .**-.-.----.--.----~-------.-.---- ~-----,i:~:5·~----** **~.~. -1"3:5-~**  et MW lIb/lbmole-mole): 28.00 28.02 28.00 olume Flow Rate (ACFM): 77243 1842919 1883297 olume Flow Rate (SCFM): 1449468 1416305 1450130 olume Flow Rate (DSCFM): 1163794 1139102 1162311 Sample Volume (dscfl: 32.907 33.677 33.077 PM Collected (mg):

Filterable: 8.3 9.2 9.6 Filterable PM10: 5.2 7.7 6.1 PM Concentration (gr/dscf):

Filterable: 0.0039 0.0042 0.0045 Filterable PM10: 0.0024 0.0035 0.0028 PM Emission Rate Ub/hr):**~'6.'1**

Filterable: 38.94 41.05 Filterable PM10: 23.96 34.21 PM Emission Rate Ub/MMBtu):

Filterable: 0.0079 0.0085 0.0090 Filterable PM10: 0.0049 0.0071 0.0057
:i Isokinetic Variance 101.0 99.7 101.6

GE Energy Project M22A04278 

## 4

### APPENDIX



# 5

### Project Participatants

Agency Observers 

### Jim Semerad, Ben Gress GE Energy Project Manager 

### Bruce Randall GE Energy Test Crew 

### Tim Singer, Alan Phillips, Mike Hoehn, Wayne Zoeteman



# 6company: Minnkota Power Coop B2 Plant: Milton R. Young Station Hwy 25 City/St: Center, ND 58530 Source: UNIT 2 GE Energy NetDAHS© Average Values Report Generated: 6/9/2008 09:24 version 44.'0

Period Start: 5/7/2008 10:13

Period End: 5/7/2008 11:33

Validation Type: 1/1 min

Averaging Period: 1 min Type: BlockAvg

Period Start: 05/07/2008 10:13 05/07/2008 10:14 05/07/2008 10:15 05/07/2008 10:16· 05/07/2008 10:17 05/07/2008 10:18 05/07/2008 10:19 05/07/2008 10:20 05/07/2008·10:21 05/07/2008 10:22 05/07/2008 10:23 05/07/2008 10:24 05/07/2008 10:25 05/07/2008 10:26 05/07/2008 10:27 05/07/2008 10:28 05/07/2008 10:29 05/07/2008 10:30 05/07/2008 10:31 05/07/2008 10:32 05/07/2008 10:33 05/07/2008 10:34 05/07/2008 10:35 05/07/2008 10:36 05/07/2008 10:37 05/07/2008 10:38 05/07/2008 10:39 05/07/2008 10:40**~S/07/2008** 10:41 05/07/2008 10:42 05/07/2008 10:43 05/07/2008 10:44**OS/0~/2008** 10:45 05/07/2008 10:46 05/07/2008 10:47 ·05/07/2008 10:48 05/07/2008 10:49 05/07/2008 10:50 05/07/2008 10:51 05/07/2008 10:52 05/07/2008 10:53 05/07/2008 10:54 05/07/2008 10:55 05/07/2008 10:56 05/07/2008 10:57 05/07/2008 10:58

. 05/07/2008 10:59

05/07/2008 11:00 05/07/2008 11:01 05/07/2008 11:02 05/07/2008 11:03 05/07/2008 11:04 05/07/200811:05 05/07/2008 11:06 05/07/2008. 11:07 05/07/2008 11:08 05/07/2008 11:09 05/07/2008 11:10 05/0.7/2008 11:11 05/07/2008 11:12 05/07/2008 11:13 05/07/2008 11:14 Average Unit_Load MW

470.4 470.6 470.7 466.8 468.9 464.8 461.9 466.1 465.5 467.1 468.6 467.9 469.2 466.9 465.9 465.8 466.8 466.2 466.7 470.2 468.6 467.6 469.2 468.2 464.0 462.2 463.4 464.1 467.1 468.8 468.3 467.9 468.1 470.8 469.1 471.2 467.7 465.3 465.4 467.0 466.3 466.8 466.0 470.6 470.1 465.0 465.2 466.3 466.2 466.6 464.0 462.7 463.3 465.4 469.1 468.3 466.8 470.3 469.0 466.8 467.7 464.6 Average Opacity % 9.4 9.3 9.3 9.3 9.3 9.4 9.6 9.6 9.6 9.5 9.5 9.4 9.3 9.3 9.3 9.3 9.3 9.3 9.4 9.2 9.1 9.0 9.1 9.0 9.0 9.1 9.4 9.4 9.3 9.4 9.3 9.2 9.2 9.4 9.6 9.7 9.2 9.6 9.9 9.7 9.7 12.6 10.1 10.2

9.4 9.1 9.1 9.1 8.9 9.2 9.1 9.2· 9.3 9.3 9.3 9.1 9.3 9.1 9.1 8.9 8.9 8.9

Page 1 of 2 

# 7per:i.od start: 05/07/2008 11:15 05/07/2008 11:16 05/07/2008 11:17 05/07/2008 11:18 05/07/2008 11:19 05/07/2008 11:20 05/07/2008 11:21 05/07/2008 11:22 05/07/2008 11:23 05/07/2008 11:24 05/07/2008 11:25 05/07/2008 11:26 05/07/2008 11:27 05/07/2008 11:28 05/07/2008 11:29 05/07/2008 11:30 05/07/2008 11:31 05/07/2008 11:32 05/07/2008 11:33 Daily Average* Maximum*

Minimum* Average Un:i.t _ Load MW

463.8 466.8 466.4 465.3 464.1 465.3 462.9 464.3 464.8 465.8 470.1 466.9 464.9 463.3 463.4 466.1 462.9 463.4 467.4 466.6 471.2 05/07/2008 10:48 461.9 05/07/2008 10:19 GE Energy NetDAHS© Average Opacity % 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.3 9.1 9.2 9.1 9.2 9.1 9.0 8.9 8.9 8.9 8.9 8.9 9.0 9.1 9.1 9.3 12.6 05/07/2008 10:54

8.9 05/07/2008 11:30 Version 44.0

* Does not include Invalid Averaging Periods (liN/A")



# 8

Page 2 of 2GE Energy NetDAHS@ Average Values Report Generated: 6/9/2008 09:26
company: Minnkota Power Coop B2 Plant: Milton R. Young Station Hwy 25 City/St: Center, ND 58530 Source: UNIT 2
Average Average Unit_Load Opacity Period Start: MW % 05/07/2008 08:20 465.6 9.7 05/07/2008 08:21 466.9 9.6 05/07/2008 08:22 469.6 9.7 05/07/2008 08 :23 470.7 9.6 05/07/2008 08:24 470.4 9.6 05/07/2008 08:25 472.6 9.5 05/07/2008 08:26 472.2 9.4 05/07/2008 08:27 468.5 9.5 05/07/2008 08:28 468.0 9.6 05/07/2008 08:29 465.4 9.6 05/07/2008 08:30 467.1 9.7 05/07/2008 08:31 468.8 9.8 05/07/2008 08:32 466.6 9.7 05/07/2008 08 :33 469.1 9.7 05/07/2008 08:34 469.5 9.5 05/07/2008 08:35 470.2 9.5 05/07/2008 08:36 470.8 9.4 05/07/2008 08:37 468.1 9.5 05/07/2008 08:38 469.8 9.4 05/07/2008 08:39 468.9 9.4 05/07/2008 08:40 471.5 9.5 05/07/2008 08:41 468.0 9.5 05/07/2008 08:42 468.3 9.6 05/07/2008 08:43 465.8 9.7 05/07/2008 08:44 465.1 9.6 05/07/2008 08:45 465.9 9.8 05/07/2008 08:46 465.2 10.2 05/07/2008 08:47 469.5 10.4 05/07/2008 08:48 469.5 10.5 05/07/2008 08:49 469.0 10.2 05/07/2008 08:'50 472.5 9.5 05/07/2008 08:51 471.0 9.5 05/07/2008 08:52 472.4 9.5 05/07/2008 08:53 472.9 9.6 05/07/2008 08:54 469.4 9.8 05/07/2008 08:55 467.5 10.1 05/07/2008 08:56 466.5 10.0 05/07/2008 08:57 464.6 9.7 05/07/2008 08 :58 466.5 9,4 05/07/2008 08:59 466.4 9.5 05/07/2008 09:00 468.5 9.5 05/07/2008 09:01 466.5 9.4 05/07/2008 09:02 470.0 9.3 05/07/2008 09:03 472.0 9.3 05/07/2008 09:04 467.6 9.4 05/07/2008 09:05 464.4 9.4 05/07/2008 09:06 465.2 9.5 05/07/2008 09:07 463.4 9.7 05/07/2008 09:08 463.7 9.7 05/07/2008 09:09 466.6 9.9 05/07/2008 09:10 467.3 9.6 05/07/2008 09:11 470.0 9.7 05/07/2008 09:12 468.6 9.5 05/07/2008 09:13 471.8 9.4 05/07/2008 09:14 469.9 9.4 05/07/2008 09:15 470.0 9.4 05/07/2008 09:16 466.8 9.4 05/07/2008 09:17 468.0 9.5 05/07/2008 09:18 467.3 9.5 05/07/2008 09:19 470.6 9.6 05/07/2008 09:20 468.1 9.6 05/07/2008 09:21 471.4 9.5 

# 9

Page 1 of 2 version 44.'0

Period Start: 5/7/2008 08:20

Period End: 5/7/2008 09:38

Validation Type: 1/1 min

Averaging Period: 1 min Type: Block AvgPer:i.od Start: 05/07/2008 09:22 05/07/2008 09:23 05/07/2008 09:24 05/07/2008 09:25 05/07/2008 09:26 05/07/2008 09:27 05/07/2008 09:28 05/07/2008 09:29 05/07/2008 09:30 05/07/2008 09:31 05/07/2008 09:32 05/07/2008**0~:33** 05/07/2008 09:34 05/07/2008 09:35 05/07/2008 09:36

. 05/07/2008 09:37

05/07/2008 09:38 Daily Average* Maximum*

Minimum* Average Un:i.t Load MW

470.1 471.6 470.5 470.2 467.6 466.3 467.2 466.8 466.5 471. 7 470.9 471.1 469.4 471.0 467.8 466.7 467.9 468.6 472.9 05/07/2008 8:53 463.4 05/07/2008 9:07 GE Energy NetDAHS© Average Opac:i.ty % 9.4 9.4 9.4 9.4 9.5 9.5 9.7 9.7 9.7 9.6 9.5 9.5 9.4 9.3 9.3 9.4 9.4 9.6 10.5 05/07/2008 8:48

9.3 05/07/2008 9:36 version 44.0



### * Does not include Invalid Averaging Periods (liN/Ali)



# 10

Page 2 of 2company: Minnkota Power coop B2 Plant: Milton R. Young Station Hwy 25 City/St: Center, NO 58530 Source: UNiT 2 GE Energy NetDAHS@ Average Values Report Generated: 6/9/2008 09:28 Version 44:0

Period Start: 5/7/2008 09:06

Period End: 5/7/2008 10:27

Validation Type: 1/1 min

Averaging Period: 1 min Type: Biock Avg

Period start: 05/07/2008**09~06** 05/07/2008 09:07 05/07/2008 09:08. 05/07/2008 09:09 05/07/2008 09:10 05/07/2008 09:11 05/07/2008 09:12 05/07/2008 09:13 05/07/2008 09:14 05/07/2008 09:15 05/07/2008 09:16 05/07/2008 09:17 05/07/2008 09:18 05/07/2008 09:19 05/07/2008 09:20 05/07/2008 09:21 05/07/2008 09:22 05/07/2008 09:23 05/07/2008 09:24 05/07/2008 09:25 05/07/2008 09:26 05/07/2008 09:27 05/07/2008 09:28 05/07/2008 09:29 05/07/2008 09:30 05/07/2008 09:31 05/07/2008 09:32 05/07/2008 09:33 05/07/2008 09:34 05/07/2008 09:35 05/07/2008 09:36 05/07/2008 09:37 05/07/2008 09:38 05/07/2008 09:39 Osi07/2008 09:40 05/07/2008 09:41 05/07/2008 09:42 05/07/2008 09:43 05/07/2008 09:44 05/07/2008 09:45 05/07/2008 09:46 '05/07/2008 09:47 05/07/2008 09:48 05/07/2008 09:49 05/07/2008 09:50 05/07/2008 09:51 05/07/2008 09:52 05/07/2008 09:53 05/07/2008 09:54 05/07/2008 09:55 05/07/2008 09:56 05/07/2008 09:57 05/07/2008 09:58 05/07/2008 09:59 05/07/2008 10:00 05/07/2008 10:01 05/07/2008 10:02 05/07/2008 10:03 05/07/2008 10:04 05/07/2008 10:05 05/07/2008 10:06 05/07/2008 10:07 Average Unit_Load MW

465.2 463.4 463.7 466.6 467.3 470.0 468.6 471.8 469.9 470.0 466.8 468.0 467.3 470.6 468.1 471.4 470.1 471.6 470.5 470.2 467.6 466.3 467.2 466.8 466.5 471.7 470.9 471.1 469.4 471.0 467.8 466.7 467.9 469.6 468.3 471.0 469.9 466.8 468.2 468.1 466.4 465.2 465.1 462.1 466.4 469.1 471.2 468.6 468.1 471.2 469.9 466.9 472.2 468.2 470.3 470.2 469.6 471.7 466.1 469.3 466.7 465.2 Average Opacity % 9.5 9.7 9.7 9.9 9.6 9.7 9.5 9.4 9.4 9.4 9.4 9.5 9.5 9.6 9.6 9.5 9.4: 9.4 9.4 9.4 9.5 9.5 9.7 9.7 9.7 9.6 9.5 9.5 9.4 9.3 9.3 9.4 9.4 9.5 9.4 9.3 9.3 9.4 9.4 9.4 9.9 10.1 10.4 10.0

9.8 9.9 9.8 9.7 9.9 10.1 10.1

9.7

. 9.5

9.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 9.4 9.5 9.3 9.4 9.4

Page 1 of 2 

# 11Period start: 05/07/2008 10:08 05/07/2008 10:09 05/07/2008 10:10 05/07/2008 10:11 05/07/2008 10:12 05/07/2008 10:13 05/07/2008 10:14 05/07/2008 10:15 05/07/2008 10:16 05/07/2008 10:17 05/07/2008 10:18 05/07/2008 10:19 05/07/2008 10:20 05/07/2008 10:21 05/07/2008 10:22 05/07/2008 10:23 05/07/2008 10:24 05/07/2008 10:25 05/07/2008 10:26 05/07/2008 10:27 Daily Average* Maximum*

Minimum* Average Unit Load MW

462.6 466.4 467.2 465.6 469.1 470.4 470.6 470.7 466.8 468.9 464.8 461.9 466.1 465.5 467.1 468.6 467.9 469.2 466.9 465.9 468.1 472.2 05/07/2008 9:58 461.9 05/07/2008 10:19 GE Energy NetDAHS© Average Opacity % 9.4 9.5 9.6 9.5 9.5 9.4 9.3 9.3 9.3 9.3 9.4 9.6 9.6 9.6 9.5 9.5 9.4 9.3 9.3 9.3 9.5 10.4 05/07/2008 9:48

9.3 05/07/2008 10:27 Version 44.0



### * Does not include Invalid Averaging Periods ("N/A")



# 12

Page 2 of 2

# GE Energy

Particulate Sampling T.rain Equipped With In-5tack Filter USEPA Method 17

II II II II II 

### "
Silica Gel Empty Ie X :Ie X X X X X

X Ie Ie X X • X X

X X Ie X Ie X It X

II II II II Ie X X Ie

Ie X X X X X X X Ie X X X
100 ml water 

# 1 1

# [~}. 

# i

Probe With In-Stock Filter Stock Wall

Orifice 

# 1

T Vocuum Gouge

fOOi"OI



# T Ice 80th Temperature Sensor



### Dwg-P



# 1.3

### Company: Plant: Unit: Run: Minnkota MRYoung Unit 2 

### 1 Example Calculations Page 1 of4



### Dry Molecular Weight
Md 

# = 0.44 

## x (%C02 ) + 0.32 

## x (%02) + 0.28 

## x %N2
13.5 

### 7.3
Md=
Wet Molecular Weight %02 

### =



# -----.... %N2 

### =



# ------ 79.2

Ms;:: Md x (1-Bws) + (18.0 x Bws)
Md=


### Ms=
Flue Gas Pressure 30.45 0.20

Ps = Pbar + (Pstaticl13.6)
Pbar= 

### 27.76 Pstatic = -1.20
Ps = 

### 27.67

Average Meter Temperature

n 

### Avg Tin =**~Tin** 1=1


### n

n 

### Avg Tout = 

### 1: 

## Tout 1=1 

### n
Tm = 460+ 

### (Avg Tin + 

### Avg Tout)/2 

### Avg Tin = Tm= 

### 74.3
532.8 

### Avg Tout =



# 1.4 71.3

### Example Calculations Page 2 of4

. Ideallsokinetic Sampling Nozzle Inside Diameter (based on initial assumptions): On = (0.0353 x Qm x Pm x (ls x MS)0.5 )0.5 (TmxCpx(1-Bws)x(PsXAP) )
Qm= 0.70 Pm= 27.89 Ts= Ms= 27.93 Tm= 540.0 Cp= Bws 

# = 0.20 Ps= 27.6? AP=
Dn= 

### 0.215
Actual On = 

### 0.205 640.0 0.840

1.10

Isokinetic Sampling

..

# x .. Factor (based on initial assumptions):
X= 846.72 x On4 

### x AH@i**xCp~** 

### x (1-Bwst x (Md * Ps) (Ms * 

### Pm)
On= Bws 

### = Ms=**_--..;;,0_.2~05~_AH@1** 

### =

__**1....;.7...;;;.3~4**

### __Cp =

__**0;;.;,.2;;;.;0~_** 

### Md = 30.42 Ps = 27.93 Pm = 27.89



# ----- 0.840 27.67



### X= 1.265
Actual 

### X = 

### 1.Z65
AH at Sample Point

- Example Point Ai
AHi= 

# xx APi x (lini) (Tsi)
1.10 635 Tsi=



# ----- 530 Tini= ..,..--...:..;:;.=..--_- 

### APi =



# ----- AHi= 

### 1.16
Meter Volume at Standard Conditions Vm(std) = YxVm x 528 x 29.92 (pbar +AHavg/13.6) Tm
Y= AHavg = 1.004 1.08 27.76
Vm(std) = 

### ·32.907



# :15Example Calculations Page 30f4 

### Volume of Water Vapor Condensed Vwc(std) =



### Vwc(std) 

### = Moisture Content
Bws 

# =

Vwc(std) = 

### Bws 

# = Average Duct Velocity 0.0471 x (net 

### H2

### 0 gain)
171.5

Vwc(std) (Vwc(std)+Vm(std»

__ 8_.0_7-,-8

__Vm(std)**_~32:;;;';'..;;.,;90;.,;.7** __

Vs = 85.49 x Cp x 

### Sqrt AP (avg) x (Ts (avg)/ (Ps x MS»1/2 Cp= Ps=**_---..;;o.;..;.84~O**

### __Tsavg = _.----;6.....;,.32=

...;;..5

__ 

### Sqrt AP (avg): 27.67 Ms = 28.00**-~~~-** 1.005



### Volumetric Flow Rate (Actual Basis)
Q = Vs xAx60
Vs=
Q= 

### 1920687 490.873



### Volumetric Flow Rate (Standard Basis)
Qstd = Qx Ps Tsavg x 528 29.92
Q= 1920687 Ps= 27.67 632.5 

### Qstd= 

### 1483007

### Example Calculations Page 4 of4
Volumetric Flow Rate (Standard Dry Basis) 

### Qstd(dry) 

# = Qstd x 

### (1-Bws)
Qstd=. Qstd(dry) 

# =
Isokinetic Variation: 

### 1483007 Bws 

### = 

### 1190722 0.197



### %150=

Ts= An= 

### Bws 

### = %ISO= 

### 0.0945 x Ts x Vm(std) Vs x 

### 0 x-An x Ps x 

### (1-Bws)**_~6~32;;:;;.,;;;.5** 

### __Vm(std)**_~32;;:;;'.;;.;90:...:.7**

### __Vs 

# = _..;;.0';";'00..;.00;;.:;2;:;;:2;.;;;.9_0 

### = 60.0 Ps 

# = 0.20 65.213 27.67**~M** Concentration - example for filterable:


### Co=



### M=
Co= 

### M *0.0154 Vm(std}



### __..;.80;.;;,3

__Vm(std}**_~32;;;;';".;;.;90:...:.7**

### __ 

### 0.0039 gr/dscf
PM Emission Rate (Ib/hr) - example for filterable:


### ER 

### = Co 

### * 0.00858 * Qstd(dry}
Co=
ER= 

### 0.0039


### 39.68 Ib/hr 

### Qstd(dry} 

# = 1190722



# :17LoW 1
Test Date: 5/7/2008

Orcular 25.00 Feet
490.873 Sq.Ft. 

# I TEST DATA Project Number: TEST PARAMETERS Company: Plant: Test Location: Source Condition: Test Crew: TempID: MeterID: Meter calibration Factor: PitotID: Pitot Tube Coefficient: Probe Length: -Probe Liner Material: Nozzle Diameter: Train Type: STACK CONDmONS 

### Method 5/202

M22A0427

Minnkota MRYoung Unit 2 NonnalPM T. Singer ES6 ES6 1.004 049A 0.821 9.0 ft. Stainless-Steel 0.205 in. M17 Run No.:

Duct Shape: Diameter: Duct Area: Sample Plane: Port Length: Port Size (diameter): PortType: Number of Ports Sampled: Number of Points per Port: Minutes per Point: Total Number ofTraverse Points: Test Length: MOISTURE DETERMINATION Horizontal 4.00 8.00 Range 4 3 5.0 12 60 in. in.

min.

Barometric Pressure (Pb): Static Pressure: Flue Pressure (Ps): in. Hg. Imp # Contents Initialwt. Finalwt. Net Gain in.HzO 1 100mlH20 774.0 928.9 154.9 in. Hg. abs. 2 100 ml H20 747.0 756.0 9.0 3 Empty 630.5 631.3 0.8 4 Silica Gel 798.5 805.3 6.8 Leak Check

carbon Dioxide: Oxygen: Nitrogen: 27.76 -1.20 27.67 Pre: ok

Post: 0.004 @ 6.00 13.5 7.3 79.2 In. Hg.
°/0 °/0 °/0 Total Water Gain: 171.5**----~---~----------** --------------------------------**------~** ------------_._--- STACK PARAMETERS 

### Delta If: MeterTemperature, Tm: SqrtAP: StackTemperature, Ts: MeterVolume, Vm: MeterVolume, Vmstd: MeterVolume, Vwstd: Moisture, Bws:

EMISSION DATA 1.08 72.8 1.005 172.5 35.542 32.907 8.Q78 0.197 InChes H20 

### OF Inches H20 

### OF Cubic Feet dsd wsd - Gas Weigiti:diy,Md: Gas Weight wet, Ms: Excess Air: Gas Velocity, Vs: Volumetric: Flow, ACFM: Volumetric Flow, DSCFM: Volumetric Flow, SCFM: Isokinetic Variance, %1: 30.452 27.998 53.642 63.738 1,8n,243 1,163,794 1,449,468

. 101.0 -Ib/lb mole Ib/lb mole 0/0

Type of Fuel Firing: Fuel Factor F d (dsd/mmBtu): Fuel Factor Fe (dsdlmmBtu): Coal
1910 Process Rate: (Units)

PARTICULATE LABORATORY ANALYSIS Filter/Beaker Weights I Sample Blank Data I Tare(gT I Final (g) I Net (g) I

.Vol (mil I

_ Mass (a) Filterable Fraction: Filter: 0.1096 0.1159 0.0063 Glassware Rin!!e: 73.2162 73.2188 0.0026 44.00 Less Acetone Blank: -0.0006 88.00 0.0012 Filterable Fraction Total; 0.0083

GE EneravCompany: Minnkota Plant: MR Young Location: Unit 2 X-Factor: 1.265 Test Run: Low 1 StartTime: 8:20

End Time: 9:38 Velocity Orifice**A~al** Stack MeterTemp Pump Point Port- Clock Head.Ap 

### Sqlt .AH MeterVol. Temp Inlet Outlet Vacuum Vel Point tio. Time in. H 2O .Ap in. H 2O 

### ft3 of of of in. Hg ft/sec
Al 8:20:00 1.10 1.049 1.16 197.031 175 70 69 3.0 66.64 A2 8:25:00 1.10 1.049 1.17 173 70 70 3.0 66.54 A3 8:30:00 0.86 0.927 0.93 160 71 70 3.0 58.22 8:35:00 205.894 B1 8:41:00 1.10 1.049 1.17 173 71 70 3.0 66.54 B2 8:46:00 1.10 1.049 1.17 174 74 70 3.0 66.59 B3 8:51:00 0.95 0.975 1.02 173 75 71 3.0 61.83 8:56:00 214.953 Cl 9:02:00 1.10 1.049 1.17

. 174 74 71 3.0 66.59 C2 9:07:00 1.00 ·1.000

.. 1.07 175 76 72 3.0 63.54 C3 9:12:00 0.89 0.943 0.96 173 77 73 3.0 59.85 9:17:00 223.851 01 9:23:00 1.10 1.049 1.18 173 76 73 3.0 66.54 02 9:28:00 0.97 0.985 1.04 174 78 73 3.0 62.53 03 9:33:00 0.88 0.938 0.95 173 79 74 3.0 59.51 9:38:00 232.573

1.005 L08 35.542 173 74 71

.,. 72.79 Field Notes/Comments:

GEEnergy


# :19

# I TEST DATA 

### Method 5/202 Run No.: Low 2 Project Number: M22A0427 Test Date: 5{7/2oo8
TEST PARAMETERS Company: Minnkota Duct Shape: Orcular Plant: MRYoung Diameter: 25.00 Feet Test Location: Unit 2 Source Condition: Normal PM DuctArea: 490.873 Sq.Ft. Test Crew: A. Phillips TempID: E48 Sample Plane: Horizontal MeterID: E48 Port Length: 4.00 in. Meter Calibration Factor: 1.001 Port Size (diameter): 8.00 in. PilotID: 050A PortType: Range PilotTube Coeffident: 0.828 Number of Ports Sampled: 4 Probe Length: 9.0 ft. Number ofPoints per Port: 3 Probe Uner Material: Stainless-Steel Minutes per Point: 5.0 Nozzle Diameter: 0.211 in. Total Number ofTraverse Points: 12 Train Type: M17 Test Length: 60 min. STACK CONDmONS MOISTURE DETERMINATION Barometric Pressure (Pb): 27.76 in. Hg. Imp # Contents Inltialwt. Final wt. Net Gain Static Pressure: -1.20 in. H 20 1 100 ml H20 754.8 908.0 153.2 Flue Pressure (Ps): 27.67 In. Hg. abs. 2 100 ml H20 796.5 809.1 12.6 3 Empty 639.3 640.3 1.0 Leak Check Pre: ok 4 Silica Gel 847.8 855.0 7.2 Post: 0.002 @ 10.00 in. Hg. Carbon Dioxide: 13.5 0/0 Oxygen: 7.4 0/0 Nitrogen: 79.1 0/0 Total Water Gain: 174.0 STACK PARAMETERS**",-,-~-_.-.,~ ."~~~~--~~----**  Delta H: 1.19 Inches H 2O Gas Weight dry, Md: 30.456 Ibllb mole MeterTemperature, Tm: 71.5 OF Gas Weight wet, Ms: 28;018 Ib/lbmole SqrtaP: 0.976 Inches H 2O Excess Air: 54.886 0/0 StackTemperature, Ts: 175.4 OF Gas Velocity, Vs: 62.573 MeterVolume, Vm: 36.384 CUbic Feet Volumetric Flow, ACFM: 1,842,919 Meter Volume, Vmstd: 33.677 dscf Volumetric Flow, DSCFM: 1,139,102 Meter Volume, Vwstd: 8.195 wscf Volumetric Flow, SCFM: 1,416,305 Moisture, Bws: 0.196 Isokinetic Variance, 0/01: 99.7

EMISSION DATA Type .ofFuel Firing: Fuel Factor F d (dscf/mmBtu): Fuel Factor Fe (dscf/mmBtu): coal
1910 Process Rate: (Units)

PARTICULATE LABORATORY ANALYSIS 

### I FilterlBeakerWelahts I Sample Blank Data I Tare (g) I Final Ca) I NetCgl I Vol Cml) I Mass Ca) Filterable Fraction: Filter: 0.1107 0.1176 0.0069 Glassware Rinse: 76.1321 76.1348 0.0027 32.00 Less Acetone Blank: -0.0004 88.00 0.0012

. Filterable Fraction Total: 0.0092



# 20

GE Enerav

### ITRAVERSE DATA: 

### Method 5/202
Test Run: Low 2 Start TIme: 9:06

End Time: 10:27 Company: Minnkota Plant: MR Young Location: Unit 2 X-Factor' 1.486 

# . Velocity Orifice Actual Stack MeterTemp Pump Point Port- Clock HeadAp Sqrt. AH MeterVol. Temp Inlet Outlet Vacuum Vel Point No. Time in. H20 Ap in. 

### H20 of of of in. Hg 

### ft/sec
A1 ·9:06:00 1.10 1.049 1.37 755.891 172 70 70 4.0 67.03 A2. 9:11:00 0.95· 0.975 1.18 173 70 70 4.0 62.34 A3 9:16:00 0.76 0.872 0.95 173 71 70 3.0 55.76 9:21:00 764.916 61 9:28:00 1.10 1.049 ·1

..37 175 71 70 4.0 67.19 82 9:33:00 0.99 0.994 1.23 175 72 71 4.0 63.68 63 9:38:00 0.89 0.943 1.11 174 73 71 4.0 60.39 9:43:00 774.162 Cl 9:50:00 1.10 1.049 1.36 177

. 71 71 4.0 67.29 C2 9:55:00 0.91 0.954 1.13 177 73 71 4.0 61.21 C3 10:00:00 0.85 0.922 1.06 176 74 72 4.0 59.11 10:05:00 783.213 01 10:12:00 1.10 1.049 1.36 178 72 72 4.0 67.35 02 10:17:00 0.97 0.985 1.21 177 74 71 4.0 63.19 03 10:22:00 0.77 0.877 0.96 178 74 71 4.0 56.35 10:27:00 792.275.

0.976 1.19 36.384 175 72 71 71.46 Field NoteS/Comments:



# 21 GE Energy

# I TEST DATA Project Number: TEST PARAMETERS 

### Method 5/202
M22A0427 Run No.: Low 3
Test Date: 5/7/2008

COmpany: Plant: Test Location: Source COndition: Test Crew: TemplD: MeterlD: Meter calibration Factor: PitotID: PitotTube Coefficient: Probe Length: Probe Uner Material: Nozzle Diameter: Train Type:

. STACK CONDmONS Minnkota ·MRYoung Unit 2 NonnalPM T. Singer E56 E56 1.004 049A 0.821 9.0 it. Stainless-Steel 0.205 in. M17 Duct Shape: Diameter: DuctArea: sample Plane: Port Length: Port Size (diameter): PortType: Number of Ports sampled: Number of Points per Port: Minutes per Point: Total Number ofTraver.ie Points: Test Length: MOISTUREDETERMINAnON Orcular 25.00 490.873 Holizontal 4.00 8.00 Range 4 3 5.0 12 60 Feet Sq.Ft.

in. in.

min.

Barometric Pressure (Pb): Static Pressure: Flue Pressure CPs): in.Hg. Imp # Contents Initialwt. Finalwt. Net Gain in. H2O 1 100mlH20 749.0 904.5 155.5 in. Hg. abs. 2 100mlH20 760.6 769.4 8.8 3 Empty 621.9 623.3 1.4 4 Silica Gel 854.3 862.5 8.2 Leak Check

carbon Dioxide: Oxygen: Nitrogen: STACK PARAMETERS 27.76 -1.20 27.67 Pre: 01<

Post: 0.004 @ 6.00 13.6 7.4 79.0 in. Hg.
°/0 0/0 0/0 Total Water Gain: 173.9

Delta H: MeterTemperature, Tm: SqrtAP: StackTemperature, Ts: MeterVolume, Vm: MeterVolume, Vmstd: MeterVolume, Vwstd: Moisture, Bws:

EMISSION DATA 1.09 75.9 1.007 174.3 35.934 33.077 8.191 0.198 Inches H20 

### OF Inches H20 

### OF Cubic Feet dscf wscf GasWeightaty, Md: GasWeightwet, Ms: Excess Air: Gas Velocity, Vs: Volumetric Flow, ACFM: Volumetric Flow, DSCFM: Volumetric Flow, SCFM: Isokinetic Variance, %1: 30A72 27.997 54.994 63.944 1,883,297 1,162,311 1,450,130 101.6 Ibllbmole Ibllbmole 0/0

Type of Fuel Firing: Fuel Factor Fd (dscflmmBtu): Fuel Factor Fe (dscf/mmBtu): Coal
1910 Process Rate: (Units)

PARTICULATE LABORATORYANALYSIS I Filter/BeakerWelahts 

### I Sample Blank Data I Tare (a) I Final (g) 

### I Net(g) I Vol (mil I Mass (g) Filterable Fraction:

. Filter: 0.1175 0.1256 0.0081 Glassware Rinse: 73.3297 73.3317 0.0020 40.00 Less Acetone Blank: -0.0005 88.00 0.0012 Filterable Fraction Total: 0.0096

GE Enerav 

# 22

### ITRAVERSE DATA: Method 5/202
Test Run: Low 3 Start Time: 10:13

End Time: 11:33 Company: Minnkota Plant: .MR Young Location: Unit2 X-Factor' 1.265 

# . Velocity Orifice Actual Stack MeterTemp Pump Point Port- Clock HeadAp Sqrt.. AH MeterVol. Temp Inlet Outlet Vacuum Vel Point No. Time in. H2O Ap in. H2O 

### W CIJ: 

### OF OF in. Hg ft./se(:
A1 10:13:00 1.10 1.049 1.18 232.739 174 76 74 3.0 66.59 A2 10:18:00 1.10 1.049 1.17 175 75 74 3.0 66.64 IU 10:23:.()0 0.89 0.943 0.95 174 76 74 3.0 59.90 10:28:00 241.908 B1 10:36:00 1.10 1.049· 1.18 174 76 74 4.0 66.59 B2 10:41:00 1.10 1.049 1.18 174 77 74 3.0· 66.59 B3 10:46:00 0.88· 0.938 0.94 174 78 74 3.0 59.56 ·10:51:00 250.961 C1 10:57:00 1.10 1.049 1.18 174 77 75 3.0 66.59 C2 11:02:00 1.00 1.000 1.07 174 78 75 3.0 63.49 C3 11:07:00 0.88 0.938 0.95 174 79 75 3.0 59.56 11:12:00 259.728 01 11:18:00 1.10 1.049 1.18 174 77 75 3.0 66.59 02 11:23:00 1.10 1049 1.18 175 79 75 3.0 66.64 03 11:28:00 0.85 0.922 0.91 175 80 75 3.0 58.58 11:33:00 268.673

1.007 1.09 35.934 174 77 75 75.92 Field NoteslComments:

GE Enerav 

# 23No. of Test Runs: AnalysIs RequIred: FSR#: Project:

Method 5/201A 

### :r-P'--,uu;

- -·",v)· _. ,tv,2,2- 

# A 0'\'2..1

- - 

## I

# f"'\\'I\.v-..k:o~**t>~** i

, I 

# _l-L I • , I

### MMhod~\l i 

### Cl Method 201A 

## I [J Method 202 I ' ! 

### 'larr

- -- An-

-- --;15 

### I ----I



# - -"-

. Source: 

## '-(tV,! 2-

- 

## L.c<..0**~A,\)** Project Manager:

# Sr~_ Analyst:

## \J~A- 

# \---**c..!;;J~.Ja..a(.'**

FilterAnalvsis I Sample Filter Tare Daterrime**~~temme** DatelTlme Final Net

1.0. 1.0. Weicht WelahtlBY , elahtIBv '

- ' ,'" ,,: WeiohVBv Weloht Welaht

# G.~.OJ ,I

# I~ 

# ot, y . 

### .:;. 06, 

### oS I 

### '1 ;, ,'. 1 '-, 

## It,}w 

# 1 c;£2.- 2c/j:l 

### 0./0'(<0 ',-'_.:-,' 

# o \

.... 9) 1**U~c.** 0·'\\

# 54 1

# t--J-~c.. ,,:d. " , I 

### (), //5"'1 

### O. ()()(P'3 

## , l ':>

- .,**.~** .;....'
..**~.** 

## 5.**o~.O'b** 1 

## 1'. " 

## b,

# C'~.QJ 

# (**l~·.co** ..**~;.** 1 

## ;Jt2 -''2,,07 0, (107 

## a,l \1'S' JI('c.. 

## (') .\\

## '1!~ ,

## N~G. 1 

### 0,**117~** 0, ()Of;9

.;, (f&J.7

### S I**~1** 

### '. 

# z.. 

# - J 1 

# CS1 1 

# 1f3 -2.cR 0.\\15 !:>,.06,: 

## \? 0_)151 1

## ~ec 

## 0, i

## 2..S~ ,

## ~~~ I. 

### tJ**,/~-S;(",** 

# O,oorI
<:5. /Yl> 

### .ott> 1 

### l'. 30**~-** 1 1 

# ,V {ftt 

# ,y .. -20'1**O.ll~~** 

## i:?Dg.o1' 135-=) 

## C ,\ '2.l.-\i I

### ~e.-- 

## O.I2.4-}

## ,r>~ I**(/./~tf3** 

### (), 00 

## 1, (J 

## N Method 5/201A •



## 7.:1:**3~/7** 

### I

# a ()oz,.o 7t.'/3lfB 

## I 0, C02?**73.?-f~g** 

### I (), fldZf;: DatefTime WeiahtlB



## · .:!.

.

# ····j~~i~?~b';. inJ

. DalefTime WeiahtlB

## l~. ;)-'75'1S I

## ~e::...-**~:, CJ"~**  •

# 0'6' I

### ~;. '2,.0 

## p.:,**~q** I

### ~~(...

### 5~D3**.e~** 1 

### llc.

### ~;o**71o.l?--4~1 t-.\~v**  

# -6'

-0tt.

## oD I 

## 11: '2,.0 Start Date. ,,'"

### ~-~'l~ 

## "]G,r?2.\ 

# I @

("L 

### -22">

# 1~.·~L.."\1 

# r

# ®**~{(;-lL;;'**

# T~.'lll,iZ- 

# 1(9 Beaker

1.0.**c.~** 

# c:c:
c:y

# '~'L-**~2.**

### ~)


# :d::a-\ Sample

1.0.



# 1\.1555Rogers street • Downers Grove. IL 60515 • 630-969-2703 • FAX630-969-2745



### INTERPRETING YOUR ELECTROZONE FINE PARTICLE ANALYSIS


### INTRODUCTION Your samples have been analyzed on an Elzone computerized particle size analyzer, with a working range of 

### approximately 1.01!m 

### to 3501!m diameter Electrozone analysis provides the highest resolution 

### ofany type 

### of analyzer on the market today. 

### This instrument uses the same detection principle and statistical information as the Coulter Counter.

. . The electrozone technique is not sensitive to color, refractive index, density, conductivity or particle opacity; however, it IS 

### sensitive to the envelope VOLUME 

### ofthe individual particles that are counted and sized. A 

### typical Electrozone statistical report is composed of a population base of approximately 250.000 particles over the analytical range. with the data being presented on the basis 

### ofthe EQUIVALENT SPHERICAL DIAMETER. In the electrozone measurement principle, particles suspended in an electrolyte are caused 

### to flowthrough a small 

### orifICe made of a non-conduetive material (sapphire), along with an electric current Particles traverse the orifice one at a time, causing electrical pulses at rates from 

### a few 

### thousand 

### to a few hundred per second, or lower, .depending upon the orifice size and particle concentration The amplitude of each voltage pulse is directly proportional 

### to the VOLUME displacement ofthe particle as sensed by its 

### "electrical envelope" within the sensing orifice. While the· system responds 

### to particle volume, the computer reports the DIAMETER of

### a sphere ofequal volume, hence, the 

### term "EQUIVALENT SPHERICAL DIAMETER" is used.

. Since e1eetrozone analyzers are true particle COUNlCRS, data 

### can be reported in 

### two formats

- POPULATION (count) and

VOLUME (mass). Foryour reference. the data has been reported using both 

### oftheseformats.

POPULATION (COUNTor FREQUENCy) DATA

. On Page 1 

### is the DIFFERENTIAL FREQUENCY histogram. which 

### plots the NUMBER of

### partiCles 

### detected versus 

### the size of the 

### particles detected, on a log 

### scale. As 

### the Elzone is 

### a true 

### 128-channel analyzer, ahigh-resolution graph is 

### produced The bottom, 

### left-hand side of 

### the 

### page contains··basic statistical information.· Under the heading of PERCENTILES, data is presented 

### at specific equal distant points (0.77 sigma intervals) for plotting 

### on ·Iog-probability graph paper(K&E #46 .8040) 

### On Page 2, the number following "Total Popl" indicates the numberof particles detected during the analysis. (In some cases, this number can be very large and does not directly represent the numberof particles counted due to a computer data blending operation ·or factor normalization for some specific type of 

### analyses). The number data is then tabulated according to EIzone· channel number, size in microns at that channel, counts in that channel 

### and, finally, the Cumulative Percentage of Counts GreaterThan or Equal To the 

### indicated micron size.
VOLUME (MASS) DATA On Page 

### 3 is the DIFFERENTIAL VOLUME PERCeNTAGE graph, which plots the VOLUME (mass) of 

### particles detected 

### versusthe size ofthe particles detected. on a log scale. The statistical information following the histogram is the same 

### as found on Page 1, except that the data has been converted 

### to a VOLUME (mass) format.

. Finally. on Page 

### 4, there

### will be a large numberfollowing 

### "Total VoIm" This figure represents the total VOLUME (mass) of

### all the particles, (as 

### listed under Total PopO, determined in the analysis Again, this number may not represent the cumulative volume ofall particles directly counted due to a computer data blending operation orfactor normalization for some specific types of

### analyses. This number, however, does represent both volume and mass interchangeably when a Density 

### Of 1.0 is assumed. Thus. whOe this value may be·thought 

### of in terms of micrograms, grams or pounds, the percentages listed in the tabulation information at specifIC size intervals allow one 

### to calculate how many micrograms. grams. or pounds 

### ofmaterial can be found at these specific sizes. Data is tabulated according to Elzone channel number. size in microns at that channel, relative mass in thatchannel and, finally, the Cumulative Percentage of Relative Mass GreaterThan or Equal To the. iridicated micron size.

ForadditionalqtJ9sUons specific

### to youranalysis results, please contactus dIrectly. 

### www.particletechlabs.com DR:\Elzone-0903:728 

# 25 1 

# I

;

# ; f J 

## , i 

# I

.. , I I 

# t t ; 

# r 1 

# I I f 

# i i i 

# f' !

I 

### f


# . f I I 

### I- 

# ,

• ! 

# I ! 

### i 

## , 

## ! 

# .,

### ELZONE(tm) Particle Size 

### Analysis For: GE ENERGY MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC. 1301 CORPORATE 

### CENTER DR, SUITE 111 EAGAN, MN 56121 

### By: PARTICLE 

### TECHNOLOGY LABS, LTD. 665 

### ROGERS STREET 

### DOwNERS GROVE, Il 60515 Operator: OJ COmments: POPULATION (count) 

### DATA 

### Date done: 

### 13:36 28 May 2008 Disk File: 

### 16391·1 Z.HST 

### Sample 

### #: 

### lOW 1i 

### CIIl1 COMBINE 

### lot/Job 

### #: 

### 16391; 64904,64901 

### Material: AIR EXHAUST 

### Source: MR. BRUCE RANDALL

5.013 6.919 9. 52 13.19 

### DIAM Microns 2.1

-- LOG-LINEARPLOT (RELATIVE)

_ Sample: LOW 1; ClJL1 COM 1.000 1.380 1.906 2.630 3.631 5.013 6.919 9.552 13.19 18.20 25.13 34.68 47.88

# ~~**+---+---'~-·'-··-···Lf-~_--.:-~-:** ...

# -Ij-

..

# :-~~-::·-:~+I:-**·=-.~;""":~-l!--·-:~-.-~·~..ft-_-._.-~-_:+-: ~---·~-~4-1t!-::-:.-·.~-~+t-~-:_-~.--t!-·_:-.:_-·:-=-+l-::-~:--.~** 

£ 

## i 

## I 

## ! j 

## l -; J 

### i i



# -----+_
..--

# +.-- --t--- ---1---'--'1-'

- 

# +.--_..+-- .--+-- --"'f'-'

.._. iii j ; ; 

### I ! ;



## .......+.-
...... 

# ·li--._..........!

.. -..:. ........**~.** - - - .. 

### pf·_

...._. 

## -i--**.---~~--** 

# --·+----t--···-- iii i I ! i t

- I 

### J ' iiI ! I 

# -t·····-··-t------ I 

# ------t---t---·i---·--t-·--t--····t-·····

I 

### I I ' j . , , I .! !. I 

### 1 1 •

I

# -:_~**=l~~-~.·:~:~~:]-~~~:.r~~~-~.L ~:~** **1.:~~:~: ::~** **~:'~:=:.** I 

## I------.-L-J----i i ! ! 

### f**~.~=+ ·c~·** **--i~··=·'f** 

## .. =_.!..

-.... _-}-_.-**._..:~=-=t** 

# .._.-.. -----.-------,----- I i 

### i j f J 

## i .•.-1-

-- ." 

# ··i·-_.....

# +
.....-_.f·

.. --. -.

# -f-.-" ---j. -_. -- -

## t··_-_·· I I ; I 

### ! 1 1 ! f i ! 

### I ! 1.2 

### P C 0_9 

### T 0.6- 0.3 

### C 

# o U 1.8 N 

### T 1.6 

### S

Geometric 

### Mean Size: Geom. Std Deviation: Geom. Skewness: Georn. 

### Coeff Variation: Arithmetic Mean Size: 

### Median Size: Mode Size: 

### Kurtosis: Arith Std Deviation 

### 2.012 um 1.661 um 

### 0.190 11,60 

### 2.271 um 

### 1.818 um 1.716 um 

### 32.413 1.606 um 

### - PERCENTILES :... 0.100% Counts above 

### 19.25 urn 

### 1 .000% COunts above 

### 8.223 urn 6.000% Counts above 

### 4.106 urn 

### 22.00% COunts above 

### 2.729 urn 

### 60.00% Counts above 

### 1.902 um 

### 18.00% Counts above 1.391 urn 

### 94.00% Counts above 

### 1.124 um 

### 99.00% 

### Counts above 1.026 um 

### 99.90% Counts above 

### 1.011 um 

### t 

## 1 ! 

## t f 

# I

1 

### • 1 I 

### t 

# f
I 

### f



# 26

### ELZONE<tDl) Particle Size 

### Analysis Date 

### done: 13:36 28 May 

### 2008 For: GE ENERGY MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC Disk File:· 

### 16391·1Z.HST 1301 

### CORPORATE CENTER DR, SUITE 177 EAGAN, MN 55121 Sample 

### #: lOW 1; CllL1 COMBINE By: 

### PARTiClE TECHNOLOGY LABS, l.TD. Lot/Job 

### #: 16391;64904,64907 555 ROGERS STREET DOWNERS GROVE, Il 60515 Material: AIR EXHAUST Operator: OJ Source: MR. BRUCE RANDALL Comments: 

### POPULATION (count) DATA



### -- Frequency Distrfbution Data Total Popl; 85989259 Chnl Size Counts 

### CLlBl! Oml Size Counts 

### CLllll! Chnl Size Counts**Ct:llll~** 

### Chnl Size COUnts 

### CUDU



# -- I 1000 0 100 0
. 33 2.806 1581970 20.4 65 7 872 97 2209 7716 0.04 2 1033 1536141 991 34 2898 1480440 18.6 66 8.130 98 22 81 6041 0.03 3 1 067 1633372 97 3 35 2 993 1381721 17.0 67 8.396 

### 99 2356 4696 

## o 02 4 1 102 1729821 95.3 36 3091 1286916 15-4 68 8.671 100 2433 3645 

## o 02 5 1138 1824648 93.2 37 3192 1196111 14.0 69 8.955 101 25.13 2841 

## o 01 6 1.175 1917426 91.1 38 3.296 1108754 12.6 70 9 249 102 2595 2228 0.01 7 1.213 2006777 888 39 3404 1024171 114 7 552 103 26.80 1761 

## o 01 8 1 253 2091913 864 40 3 516 941334 10.2 104 2768 1402 0.01 9 1294 2171933 83.9 41 3631 860629 919 105 2858 1121 0.01 10 1337 2245961 81.4 42 3750 782835 823 106 29 52 904 001 11 1 380 2313164 78.7 43 3.873 708543 7.37 75 10.87 27954 0.70 107 30 49 735 000 12 1.426 2372782 76 0 44 4000 638507 6.58 76 11-22 28455 

## o 67 108 3149 603 000 13 1.472 2424157 73.2 45 4.131 573732 5.88 77 11.59 28781 064 109 3252 498 0.00 14 1521 2466686 70 3 46 4266 513709 525 78 11 97 28973 0.60 110 33.58 413 

## o 00 15 1.570 2499877 67 5 47 4406 458489 468 79 12.36 29185 0.57 ' 111 34.68 339 000 16 1.622 2523341 645 48 4550 407905 4.18 80 1277 29650 054 112**35~82** 275 000 17 1.675 2536802 616 49 4 700 361069 3.73 81 13 19 30442 050 113 36.99 219 0,00 18 1 730 2540142 586 50 4.853 317338 3.34 82 13.62 31464- 046 114 38 21 173 000 19 1 787 2533267 557 51 5.013 276807 2.99 83 14.06 32512 043 115 3946 136 000 20 1845 2516180 52 8 52 5177 239188 2 69 84 14 52 33296 039 116 40.75 108 0.00 21 1906 .2489073 49.8 53 5346 204928 243 85 15 00 33576 

## o 35 117 4209 87 

## o 00 22 

### 1.968 2452460 470 64 5522 174924 

### 2.21 86 1549 33222 

## o 31 118 4346 71 0.00 23 2 032 2406749 441 55 5 702 149504 2.02 87 1600 32210 0.27 119 44 89 56 0.00 24 2099 2353007 414 56 5.889 l28556 1 86 88 16 52 30595 0.24 120 46 36 45 0.00 25 2.168 2291959 38.7 57 6.082· 111778 1. 72 89 17 06 28496 0.20 121 47.88 36 

## o 00 25 2.239 2224033 361 58 6 282 98187 1 60 90 17.62 26021 0.17 122 4945. 30 

### a 00 27 2.312 2149263 33.5 59 6.487 86733 1.49 91 18 20 23290

. 014 123 5107 15 000 28 2388 2067962 31 1 60 6 700 73248 1.40 92 18.80 20418 

## o 12 124 52 74 20 

## o00 29 2466 1979733 28 7 61 6.919 68456 1-32 93 19 41 17518 

## o 09 125 54 47 12 

## o00 30 2.547 1885510 26.5 62 7.146 57621 1.24 94 20.05 14701 0.08 126 5625 6 0.00 31 2630 1786591 243 63 7.380 54148 1 18 95 20.71 12082 

## o 06 127 58 10 4 0.00 32 2.717 1684770 223 64 7622 48096 1.12 96 21 39 9735 005 128 60 00 0 

## o00



# 27

### azONE

## ctm>Particle 

### Size

## AnalY~is For: GE ENERGY MANAGEMENT 

### SERVICES, INC. 

### 1301 CORPORATE CENTER OR, SUITE 

### 177 EAGAN, MN 

### 55121 BV: PARTICLE TECHNOLOGY LABS, LTD. 

### 555 ROGERS STREET DOWNERS GROVE, IL 

### 60516 Operator: 

### OJ Comments: VOLUME (mass) 

### DATA Date 

### done: 

### 13:36 28 MaV 2008 Disk File: 

### 16391-1Z.HST sample 

### #: LOW 1; CIIL1 COMBINE 

### Lot/Job #: 

### 16391; 64904, 64907 Material: AIR EXHAUST Source: MR. BRUCE RANDALL

LOG-UNEAR PLOT (RELAnvE) t'a13Il Sample: LOW 1; CIJll COM 1.000 1..380 1.906 2.630 3.631 5.013 6.919 9.552 13.19 18.20 25.13 34.68 47.88 

### D 40 , : t 

### i J 36 ( ! I ( iIi: ! t ( i !



# . '--':"-'f-" _.

# r'

....

# r --'" -r····

# -"T

# '-""-r"'-'r
...-- 'I'._....

# r---T -.-.

# 'r-'---r

--.. 3.2

.

# ·--_··t"'-"-t-

----. ·t--.- -'"1'**<7~Yi('W\j** -""'oj ••• 

## ··t-·
- -__r_

# """--r

.-.-. ··t-··

## -"-f"' '" V 2'.8 f 

### i 

### i**~.;** i ! 

### I ! 

## I I 

## o .. --..

# -r--····t·

..

# ·······r-
.. ···"r·

.. ··--j--··

..

# T· " "-j- --"'-T- 

# ·······i-

..--..

# r·- -. r"-' L 2.4 

## ···----j··

..

# --·+---··-i---

..

# -··4-···_·-·f--**---.-~** 

# ..-._-**.~-** 

# ..- ..j

## --~ 

# ···--·+------l·

..··· u i 1 iii iii ! [ 

### i M 2.0

..
_ ...•

## -t -. --. t!

- 

### j

.. - --J.-.

---

# +--.-- .1_•..•...•

### L -

..
__ I -. 

### i-- .1.._ '" .1

..-.-. - E i I ! 

## iii i' 

## ! I 

## ! 1.6

.. "-'

# +
.......-. t·
-'-'-

# +
..._.-+_
..--

# +
...... -+
..- 

# ----+- -....**~--** 

# ...... ....----f----- p . 

## ! I I j ! 

## iii i 

# ! C**1~2** •.. -- 

# --r
0

..... 

### ·t

.. ··· ..

### i-·-····1·---·--t-·-··-i·-······ ---·--1--

.. ··T···-**--.~_...:_____.:r_~-----ll-----** . 

### =::---l 

# I

. . -+---------.--.-
....--..- 0.8 ._._ ....

# i--

.....J

.....- .._1. '.. ';.":.: 

## .>.:
.......... 1..- 

## .=o.J

...**-._~~** 

## ...
__. I I I I I ! i i • I I 0.4 

## ----4·

.......·-·.. · .·-----f-

...- .. f 

### o -lTwlwm.¥A**yP,~~** 1.000



### Geometric Mean Size: Geom. Std 

### Deviation: Geom. Skewness: Geom, Coeff Variation: Arithmetic Mean Size: Median Size; Mode Size: Kurtosis: Arith Std Deviation 

### 10.18 um 

### 2.316 um 

### -3.143 22.75 13.52 um 

### 13.89 um 

### 17.46 um 

### 2.046 9.405 um -- PERCENTILES

- 

### 0

.. 100% Vofume above 

### 53.13 um 1 .000% Volume above 

### 40.14 um 

### 6.000% Volume above 

### 26,74 um 

### 22.00% Volume above 

### 19.53 um 

### 50.00% Volume above 

### 14.23 um 

### 78.00% Volume above 

### 4.349 um 

### 94.00% Volume above 

### 2.306 urn 

### 99.00% Volume above 

### 1.466 um



### . 99

..90% Volume above 

### 1.097 um



# 28

### ELZONE<tIn) Particle Size Analysis 

### Date done: 

### 13:36 28 May 2008 For: GE ENERGY MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC, Disk File: 

### 16391-1Z,HST 1301 CORPORATE CENTER DR, SUITE 

### 177 EAGAN, MN 

### 55121 Sample #: 

### LOW 

### 1; CI1l1 COMBINE 

### By: PARTICLE TECHNOLOGY LABS, l TO. Lot/Job 

### #: 16391;64904,64907 555 ROGERS STREET DOWNERS GROVE, IL 

### 60515 Material: 

### AIR EXHAUST Operator: OJ Source: MR. BRUCE RANDALL Comments: VOLUME 

### (mass) DATA 

# evtV\ ,

-- Volume Distribution Data 

### Total Volm: 2373891389 

### Chnl Size 

### Vollll1e ClIIlU Chnl Size 

### Volune tuml: Chnl Size 

### Volume CURtI: Chol Size 

### VollJllle ClJlll%


# - - 1 1 000 0 100.0 33 2 806 183£7 89.8 65 1.10El 66 5 97 22.09 4.35El 13 2 2 1033 885973 100 0 34 2.898 1 89E7 89 1 66 1IOEl 660 98 22 81 375El 115 3 1.067 1037715 999 35 2.993 194El 883 67 1.10£7 655 99 2356 3.21El 10.0 4 1102 1210592 999 36 3.091 199£1 87.4 68 IIDEl 65.1 100 24.33 276El 8.76 5 1.138 1406628 99.8 37 3192 2.04£7 86.6 69 115£7 64.6 101 25 13 236£7 7 68 6 1.175 1628255 99.8 38 3.296 208El 857 70 1.21E7 641 102 2695 204El 6 76 7 1.213 1877182 99.7 39 3404
. 2.12E7 84.8 71 6 103 26 80 1.77fJ 596 8 1253 2155532 996 40 3516 214£7 839 1.36£7 6 104 2768 156El 525 9 1294 2465250 995 41 3 631 216£7 830 3 10.19 48£7 105 28.58 1.37fJ 4.64 10 1337 2808150 994 42 3750 216£7 821 74 10 2 1 67E7 106 29 52 1.22£l 4.09 11 1380 3185857 99.3 43'3873 2.16£7 812 75 10.87 188E7 61.0 107 30 49 l.09£] 3.61 12 1 426 3599839 991 44 4000 2.14£7 80.3 76 1122 2.l1fJ 60.2 108 31 49 9850115 317 13 1.472 4051255 990 45 4131 2.12E7 79.4 77 11 59 2 35E7 592 109 3252 8973885 277 14 1 521 4540946 98 8 46 4266 209fJ 78 5 78 11.97 260fJ 582 110 33.58 8193840 2 41 15 1570 5069378 986 47 4.406 Z 05£7 777 79 12.36 289E7 57.1 III 3468 7414013 208 16 1.622 5636579 984 48 4550 2.01fJ 76.8 80 1277 3.23E7 55.8 112 

### 35.82 6611413 1 79 17 1 675 6242088 981 49 4 700 1.96£7 76 0 81 1319 365£7 54.3 113 36.99 5814551 1.52 18 

### 1730 6885015 978 50 4853 190£7

. 75.1 82 13 62 4:16E7 52 7 114 3821 5043249 130 19 1.787 7563651 975 51 5013 183E7 74.4

. 83 14.06 474£7 508 115 3946 4373296 1.10 20 1.845 8275528 97.2 52 5177 1.74£7 73.6 84 14.52 534El 487 116 40 75 3824762 093 21 1.906 9017690 96.8 53 5346 1.64£1 72.9 85 1500 593E7 463 117 42.09 3381069 077 22 1 968 9787307 964 54 5.522 1 54E7 72 2 86 15 49 6 47E7 43.7 118 4346 3060831 0.64 23 2.032 106E7 960 55 5.702 145fJ 71.6 87 16 00 6.91El 409 119 44 89 2670886 0.52 24 2099 114£7 956 56 5 889 137fJ 710 88 16.52 7 23E7 37.9 

### 120 4636 2352948 

## o41 , 

### , 25 2168 1.22fJ 951 57 6.082 1.32E7 704 89 17.06 7. 41E7 348 121 4788 2077637 0.32 t 26 2.239 131fJ 94.5 58 6.282 1.27£7 69.9 90 17 62 746fJ 31.7 122 49.45 1899084 023 I I 27 2 312 139£7 94.0 59 6.487 1.24£7 694 91 18 20 735El 28.6 123 51.07 1048576 0.17 I 28 2388 lA7E7 93.3 60 6 700 1. 15E7 689 92 18,80 7.10£7 25 5 .124 5274 1572864 

## o 12 j. 

## ! 29 2466 l.55fJ 92.7 61 6 919 II9£] 68.4 93 19.41 6.71El 22.6 125 54.47 1048576 006 J 30 2.547 163fJ 920 62 7.146 1.10fJ 67.9 94 20 05 620£7 199 126 56.25 524288 

## o 03 31 2.630 1.70£7 91.3 63 7380 114£7 674 95 2071 562E7 174 127 58 10 410676 0.01 32 2717 177£7 90 6 64 7.622 1 12E7 669 96 21 39 499E7 IS 2 128 6000 0 0.00 

# 70 f MW\ ; 

# q**.6(p~** 

# = 

# ,-3. 0 ! i 

### l 

## ((j.{'l 

# - (P

# i·e! !


# - ! c,2.e ; 

## /O.(}O ; i 

## i



# 29ElZONE<tm> 

### Particle Size Analysis 

### For: GE ENERGY MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC, 1301 CORPORATE CENTER DR, SUITE 177 

### EAGAN, MN 55121 By: PARTIClE TECHNOLOGY LABS, LTD. 555 ROGERS STREET DOWNERS GROVE, IL 60516 Operator: 

### OJ Comments: POPULATION (count) DATA Date done: 17:51 29 May 2008 

### Disk File: 16391-2Z.HST Sample #: LOW 2; CJIl2 COMBINE LotIJob #: 16391; 64906, 64908 Material: AIR EXHAUST Source: MR, BRUCE RANDALL

- PERCENTILES

- 0.100% Counts above 26.83 um 1.000% Counts above 18.04 urn 6.000% Counts above 8.082 um 22.00% Counts above 3.621 um 50.00% Counts above 2.583 um 78.00% Counts above 1.983 um 94.00% Counts above 1.657 um 99.00% Counts above 1.533 um 99.90% Counts above 1 .523 urn 2.886 um 1.670 um 0.339 57.85 3.455 um 2,568 um 2.321 um 14.616 3,117 urn Geometric Mean 

### Size: Geom. Std Deviation: Geom. Skewness: Geom, 

### Coeff Variation: Arithmetic Mean 

### Size: Median Size: Mode Size: Kurtosis: Arith Std Deviation 1.6

0.4 LOG-UNEAR PLOT (RELATIVE) IllIIl!!I Sample: LOW 2; CJU COM 1.500 2.005 2..681 3

..584 4.792 6.407 8.566 11.45 15.31 20.47 27.37 36.60 48.93 D 4.0 

### +----1-,--ti--t

### j ,**-~i--+I----1il----ti--t-!** ----f 

### i

# --+, --11---+ j --, I 

### ! I 'I'!!! I I ' F 3.6 _. - ..**·r-·~-** 

# ·"1--_ -1**~-** 

# .. -.

# "i--

- ----t-- 

# ·t-

..-i**~.-.** 

# t--_.-t----_.-t·_- -. - -;- -_..t-

...
_ ..... F 3.2 _.
__

## ._~-. 

# + t· 1-

## ~_.--.+ 

# -.+-_.-

# -+---.-i-----

..

# f--·-·+ + t·--·-

i 

## i 

## ! iii ; i ! 

## I



# .---1'-

--- 

# "r--' -1-- 

# "'-r"-

# ·---r----·T--

.... T"

.... 

# -r ·........ 1---

..-1---- ! J I 

## I i Iii 

## i ." !

- 

## "1"-' 

## + 'f-''''-

--- 1'-

--.. 

### -t-- -_..

## +-"-

# -r---'"--;-.-**'.~** "T"·**._~** ! r I , Ii! , I I 1

..

## L--

.... .l 

## 1 -.

__

# +-. -1.

__

### ._1.._

...

## -_.1._

......L

..-- ...J.

-- -_..

# t-
...-- !

. ! 

### ! 

### t 

## i j 

### ! i 

### ! 

## J 1 i i ! 

### .- "1- .--**--f'-'-"'~"'-'-"'~--""** ."-- ._ ••

### t---·_··

..··-- ---f

.. - .." .- ..>
.....-

r 

### f f iii 

### ! I 

# --!

# ~==t~=t=t:~:t::=t~:t:~t-:t::~~_·_--~·**~~----+-.--~** i I . I 

### ! i i ! , f r i !. i

. f j 

### -,..... --....i·

...------4-.-

- _.**~--** 

### ---

## --J.--

--- -1--

....
_ ..... l-

.. .- .....**_~** .....- -

• r i i 

### ! i 

### ! i 

### i



# .. iii

36.60 48.93 

## ! : 

# I i j 

# g 2.8 U 2.4 N T 2.0 

### S p C 1,2 

## ---------------:r---- 0_8

, , i 

## , ; i 

### , , 

# I ! f ; 

# 30

# 31

### ElZONE<tm) Particle Size Analysis For: GE ENERGY MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INCo 1301 CORPORATE CENTER DR, SUITE 177 EAGAN, MN 55121 

### BV: PARTICLE TECHNOLOGY LABS, L TO. 556 ROGERS STREET DOWNERS GROVE, IL 60615 Operator: OJ Comments: VOLUME (mass) DATA Date done: 17:51 29 May 2008 Disk Rle: 16391-2ZoHST Sample 

### #: LOW 2; CJJl.2 COMBINE Lot/Job 

### #: 16391;64905,64908 Material: AIR EXHAUST Source: MR. BRUCE RANDALL 

# eCAv1 Z1.6 P C 1 2 

## o:lf
04 

# 6 2.8 L 2.4 U M 200 E LOG-UNEAR PLOT (RELATIVE) I§!§!I. Sample: LOW 2; CJIl2 COM t.5oo 2.005 2.681 3.584 4.792 8.407 8.566 11.45 15.31 20.47 27.37 36.60 48.93 

# r::: +-.-
.....

# _-1.~'-.-_- .• -.+1..--.- ...-

...

# ~-t'-.--.- ..-.+1.

- ....

# -~ .-..

# .J---._-

..- . ..

+-t.-.+

..-.

# ~-+!.- ..-

..

-_-.rf-; _-

.. 

# -_-.+!.-.-._-

..

-,.

t!-.--.-

.'-"i+!'--"-'.- ..--f.!-_ .-.

_--."

.



### . F

. ! 

## I ! i j 

## ! ! I i ! ! 3.2 ·_ ..-.·i ._..**_._~-** ..... 

### -i·

..· .-" 

### 4-· --._·i··;...··.--i··

.. - .L.

__._}

__ ..
_ L

... _.-l

...
_ ..

### --i-._

....... ....• 

### j f 

### f f 

### f 

### r f 

### r f 

# LIt



# ....
__..· ..t·-'-

..**·T·~·tD·** 

# -o/ttm·t

..·_. :.. ---+.-._...-t 

# -----t

....._-+--
.. --r--"

iii' iii 

### ! '! it!



### -**~_** 

### .. --f..

-- ...- ... {---

-.. - o}

...-- ... _. 

## +--- ..
_ ..t-_·

..--..i

..·.. --

## + _'·

__ 0 • _._f--.

.. --- -¥

.......
_ .... _1

.. -.. - 

### i ! i ! iii 

## iii

- .. '

_ ..L._. 

## ··t··-··

.. ...I.•.

_..

### _L_

...
_..L 

## .---1.-. 

## ·i--

.-too

_......i._

. ._--i.- "'"



### 1 ! i i 

### ! !! 

### I I I I J 

### I ! ! I [

. i 

### i



## ....... ·r·"-'· --1--

.... "

..

# r·
.... ·i'

......-

## T-

....·..

# -r·_· '''-r**~--_** 

# .. t"'''-··r-'''' 

## I 

# -! j 

### iii 

### i f i

# .~.:~~:'**4:';~-~~~r~:~~~~IL: ·~·~l:·:~:·~r:~'~** **~~:: -:-~** 

# - ...**~.-**

# r**~:~~:1~ ~~** **~----_._--------_**

# ..
__._. •. _.. I



# ..**----~** 

# .--._.f---. 1

- !

...... 

## -1

......
__ I •• ......**.:~** 

### Ii!**+r.w~~**

Geometric Mean Size: Georn. Std Deviation: Georn. Skewness: Georno Coeff Variation: Arithmetic Mean Size: Median Size: Mode Size: Kurtosis: Arith Std Deviation 15.34 um 10849 um -1.701 12.06 17083 um 16.099 um 18.48 urn 2.766 9.021 um



# 32**~.** PERCENTILES

-- 0.100% Volume above 56.23 urn 1.000% Volume above 44.62 um 6.000% Volume above 31.93 urn 22.00% Volume above 23.12 urn 50.00% Volume above 17.29 um 78.00% Volume above 11.86 um 94.00% Volume above 4.012 urn 99000% Volume above 2.264 urn 99090% Volume above 1 .664 um

### ElZONE(tIII) Particle Size Analysis Date done: 17:51 29 May 2008 

### For: GE ENERGY MANAGEMENT. SERVICES, INC, Disk Ale: 

### 16391·2Z.HST 1301 CORPORATE CENTER DR, SUITE 177 EAGAN, MN 55121 sample 

### #: lOW 2; 

### CJJl.2 COMBINE By: PARTIClE TECHNOLOGy LABS, L TO. Lot/Job 

### #: 16391;64906.64908 555 ROGERS STREET DOWNERS GROVE, IL 60515 Material: 

### AIR EXHAUST Operator: OJ 

### Source: MR BRUCE RANDALL Comments: 

# ,e <A 

## Vl VOLUME (mass) 

### DATA 

# '2.-

- - Volume Oistr1 buti OIl Data

. Total Volm: 

### 1108345176 Chnl Size Volume Cum); Chnl Size Volume CunlS Chnl Size Volune CtJm1% thol Size Volune CUdlf
cnc= 

### ca===----_ 

# -- I 

### 1.600 0 100 0 33 3 798 3661172 94.6 97 24.37 2. 16E7 18.2 2 1544 301749 100.0 34 

### 3 910 ·3547856 943 843 

### 98 25.09 197fJ 16 4 3 

### 1589 352866 

### 100.0 35 4.026 3502515 940 83 99 

### 25 83 1.80E7 14 7 4 1.636 410531 999 36 4144 3417985 93 7 7 100 26 59 1.63fJ 13 1 5 1684 475175 99.9 37 4 266 3305604 934 69 10.81 I1DEl 81 8 101 27 37 149El 117 6 

### 1 734 547186 

### 99.8 38 4 392 3182234 93.1 70 11.12 122E7 807 102 28 18 1.37E7 10.4 

### 7 1785 626882 998 39 

### 4.622 3064543 

### 92.8 71 11.45 

### 134El 79.6 103 29 01 126El 924 8 1.838 714511 

### 99.7 40 4655 2964214 ·92.5 72 11 79 1.48E7 783 104 29.86 115E7 8.15 9 

### 1.892 810223 997 41 4.792 2888435 92.2 73 12

..14 161El 76.9 105 3074 1.04E7 

### 7 16 10 1948 

### 914061 996 42 4 933 2836587 920 74 12.50 175E7 754 106 31 65 9346361 6 2,7 11 2005 1025912 995 43 5.079 2802522 91 7 75 12.86 1 89E7 138 107 3258 8313555 5.48 12 2064 1145564 

### 994 44- 

### 5228 2782220 

### 91 5 76 13.24 203El 120 108 33.54 7331417 4.77 13 2125 1272626 99.3 45 

### 5.382 2771650 91 2 77 

### 1363 215El 70 1 109 34 53 6468077 4.15 14 2188' 1406543 99.2 46 5541 2766560 91.0 78 14.03 228£7 68.1 110 3565 

### 5716104 3.60 15 2 252 1546600 99.0 47 5.704 2764004 90.7 79 1446 241£7 66.0 III 36.60 

### 5055918 3.11 16 2.318 1591902 989 48 

### 5 872 2762334 90.5 80 14.87 255£7 637 112 3768 4480162 2.68 17 

### 2.387 1841373 98.7 49 

### 6.045 2756655 

### 902 81 15.31 2.70E7 61.4 113 38 79 3971522 2.30 18 2467 1993802 985 50 6223 

### 2746863 900 82 15 76 285£7 589 114 3993 3533129 1.96 19 2 529 2147801 984 51 6407 2737365 89.7 83 16.23 3 OOE7 56.2 115 41.11 3091096 1 66 20 

### 2 604 2301851 982 52 

### 6.596 2732068 89.5 84 

### 1671 313E7 53.5 116 42.32 2737679 1.40 21 2 681 2454317 97 9 53 6.790 2736885 89.2 85 1720 3.23£7 50.6 117 4356 2380872 1.17 22 2760 2603494 97 7 54 6990 2758743 89 0 86 

### 1771 3:31E7 476 118 4485 2078098 0.97 23 2 841 2747604 975 65 

### 7.196 2795850 88 7 87 18.23 3.34E7 446 119 46 17 1803521 079 24 2925 2862303 972 56 

### 7 408 2846651 

### 88.5 88 18.76 334E7 

### 416 120 4753 1574168 

### OM 25 3011 2953447 97 0 57 7 627 2913027 88 2 89 

### 19 32 3.30£7 386 121 48 93 1349447 051 26 

### 3.100 3028326 967 58 7.851 3145788· 88 0 90 

### 19 89 324£7 35.7 122 50 37 1137686 

### o 40 

### 27 3191 3099490 96.4 59 8 083 3407845 87 7 91 20.47 314E7 328 123 ·51.86 949197 0.30 28 

### 3285 3175477 961 60 8 321 3670127 87.3 92 21.08 3.02El 300 

### 124 

### 5338 876285 022 29 3382 3263144 958 61 8 566 4194143 87 

## a . 93 

### 21.70 287fJ 274 125 54 96 695317 

## o 15 30 

### 3482 3355899 95.6 62 8 818 4980640 86.6 

### 94 22 34 2.71E7 249 126 66 58 663790 

## o 09 31 

### 3.684 3443754 95.2 63 

### 9.078 55049n 

### 861 95 

### 22.99 2 54fJ· 225 127 58 24 413840 0.04 

### 32 3690 3512874 949 64 

### 9346 6291657 856 96 

### 23.67 235£7 20.3 128 

### 6996 225758 0.01**AA~** 

# 16 q.c,05' £?I. 

# :3 /0,20**63~f;?**



# /0·0**0~,O** j 

# i 

# , , ! 

# t
!

i

_ f

... : 

# 33

### azONECbI) 

### Particle 

### Size Analysis 

### For: 

### GE ENERGY MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC. 

### 1301 CORPORATE CENTER DR, SUITE 

### 171 EAGAN, MN 65121 

### By: PARTICLE TECHNOLOGY 

### LABS, lTD 555 ROGERS STREET DOWNERS GROVE,.Il 60516 

### Operator: OJ Comments: 

### POPULATION (count) 

### DATA Date done: 10:09 31 May 2008 Disk RIe: 16391·3Z.HST sample 

### #: lOW 

### 3; CKJl.3 COMBINE 

### lot/Job #: 16391; 64906,64909 Material: 

### AIR EXHAUST Source: MR. 

### BRUCE RANDAU

47.88 LOG-UNEAR PLOT (RELATIVE)

_ Sample: LOW 3; CKJ1..3 COM 1.000 1..380 1.906 2.630 3.631 5.013 6.919 9.552 13.19 18.20 25.13 34.68 47.88

F 

# p**:~:** +---+--::-t--

.. -

...+-1.-

..-

..-

..

## -!1L.

.-

.._- ..



## -+!--

..-

...-.-. +f- 

## 1 _-

... - ..- ...

# -t~- ..-

...

-.-

..

### +-!---.- .-.. -1

# 1

1-

..

---.- ..

### .;.-+1-

..-

.. - ..-.f- 

# I..

- ..-

..-

.. -t 

## l- ...-

..-' ! i , 

### i ! 

## i i 

### ! i 

## ! F 2.4 

## ! .-.. --{

..... -..f,

......

## --f

..
_ ..

# +
..-···i .-.. -.-

# t··_·

..

# +_
...-··1··

...... 

# t---·

! 

### I 

### ! ! 

### t' ; i 1 (1' i 'i! i I! I 

## "''''''''i ··..

## ····1· ·

__

# ·-t.--_. --'---T'-

.. 

# ·t

....-. ··t·

..·- 

# '1""-'-'r'--'

. i ! 

## I I ! ! 

### i. i l 

## -_..... r
.....
__ 4

_ .. ..!..**-~** .....·r... ·- ... ---j-----

......... .,:.
....**-~--.~-.-** ... L

.... _. - F --_._,.;.- - -_ .. i [ 

### iiI 

## i 

# -t-

..·-t-

# '--1-'---+-'

# ···t-_. ··t··

..

# ----t--.--+-
.. , ..

# _+
. I ._._

## L.

........ 1.

...J

... 

## O'

.. 1

-- .
__

### -1-

..

# -----f

...--.-l.. 

## '_"0-1

_ . Ii; !

. . j I ! ; 

### I I I 

### I ' I

# ~t~:~t~~t::t.·.**·J~1~:J·:~:l:·-**

# ..**~+· ~~** **-.~-~---...--..._------:-.~~._.--** ! 

### ! 

## iii i ! 

# ._.-f----

# -1--**~-- -t·---~···**  

# t-**-_.~~. T~·**  M • ••

# +
...**·-~·l-·** f ! 

### I. t ! 

### l f 

# g 2.1 U N 

### T 5 p C



### -------.-------------.....:=f

Geometric Mean Size: 

### Geom. Std Deviation: Geom. Skewness: Geom. 

### Coeff Variation: Arithmetic Mean Size: 

### Median Size: Mode Size: Kurtosis: Arith Std Deviation 2.034 um 

### 1.564 

### urn 0.177 76.89 2.298 um 1.881 

### um 1.768 

### urn 36.914 1.633 

### urn - PERCENTILES

- 0.100% Counts above 20.04 um 1 .000% Counts above 8.412 

### urn 6.000% Counts above 4.161 um 22.00% Counts above 

### 2.757 

### urn 50.00% Counts above 

### 1.924 

### urn 78.00% Counts above 

### 1.407 um 94.00% Counts above 

### 1.130 

### urn 99.00% Counts above 

### 1.026 um 99.90% 

### Counts above 1 .011 

### urn



# 34

### El20NE<tm) Particle Size Analysis 

### Date done: 10:09 31 May 

### 2008 

### For: GE ENERGY MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC" Disk Fde: 16391-3Z.HST 1301 CORPOMTE CENTER DR, SUITE 177 EAGAN, MN 55121 Sample 

### #: lOW 3; 

### CKA.3 COMBINE By: 

### PARTICLE TECHNOLOGY LABS, LTD. LotIJob 

### #: 18391; 64906,64909 565 ROGERS STREET DOWNERS GROVE, IL 60515 Material: 

### AIR EXHAUST Operator: OJ Source: MR 

### BRUCE RANDALL Comments: POPULATION (count) DATA

_. Frequency Distr'ibution Data 

### Total Popl: 88844225 Chnl 

### Size 

### Counts CunU Cltnl Size Counts CuliU Chnl Size ColIIts 

## eunu- Chnl Size Counts 

# Cumu



# -- .. 

# -

...........::a&C... "-ZMPI'" --.-

# .... 1 

### 1.000 0 100.0 33 2.806 1671952 21 0 65 7.872 51306 111 97 22 09 9932 0.06 2 1033 1494035 992 34 2898 156]064 19 2 66 8 130 47516 1 06 98 2281 8466 0.05 3 1067 1595724 97.4 35 2993 1465496 175 67 8396 44551 1 00 99 23.56 7107 0.04 4 1 102 1697335 956 36 3091 1366987

. 15 9 68 8671 42252 0.95 100 24.33 5874 

### o 03 5 1.138 1798003 93.6 37 3 192 1271360 144 69 8955 40399 

## o 91 101 25.13 4784 003 6 1 175 1897140 91.5 38 3296 1177822 13 0 70 9.249 38813 

## o 86 102 2595 3855 

## o 02 7 1 213 1993554 

### 89 3 39 3404 1085566 118 71 9 552 37373 0.82 103 26.80 3088 0.02 8 1.253 2086284 870 40 3 516 994809 10.6 72 9.865 35979 

## o78 104 2768 2473 0.01 ,9 1294 2174354 846 41 3631 906795 953 73 10 19 34616 074 ' 105 2858 1988 

## o 01 10 1.337 2256797 82.1 42 3750 822678 8.56 74 1052 33323 0.70 106 29.52 1606 0.01 11 1.380 2332672 79.6 43 3 873 743590 768 75 10.87 32147 0.66 107 30 49 1306 

## o01 12 1 426 2401128 769 44 4000 670337 688 76 11.22 31131 063 108 3149 1068 

## o01 13 1 472 2461368 74 2 45 4.131 602969 6.17 77 11.59 

### 30334 0.69 109 3252 880 . 0 01 14· 1 621 2512683 714 46 4266 540803 5.52 78 11.97 29749 056 110 3358 731 0.00 15 1.570 2554465 68.5 47 4-406 483295 4.95 79 1236 29347 0.53 111 

### 34.68 611 0.00 16 1.622 2586215 656 48 4550 430221 443 80 12.77 29096 0.49 112 35.82 513 000 j 17 1 675 2607548 627 49 4.700 381286 3 97 81 13 19 28970 046 113 36.99 432 0.00 

# I 18 1.730 2618258 59.8 50 4853

. 336418 367 82 13.62 28918 043 114 38.21 363 

### o 00 19 1.787 2618143 56.8 51 5 013 295871 3 21 83 14 06 28885 040 115 '3946 304 0.00 

### I I 20 1 845 2607092 53.9 52 5.177 259478 2 90 84 14.52 28786 0.36 116 40,75, 254 0.00 

## ! 21 1 906 2585216 50.9 53 5346 226851 2 63 85 15.00
. 28513 0.33 117 4209 211 000 22 1 968 2552927 

### 481 54 5.522 197768 2 39 86 15 49 27970 0.30 118 43.46 172 000 23 2.032 2510913 45.2 55 5 702 171985 2.18 87 1600 27109 027 119 44.89 141 

## o 00 j 24 2099 2460250 424 56 5.889

. 149214 200 88 16 52 25916 024 120 46 36 115 OJJO 

# I 25 2 168 2401759 39.7 57 6 082 129431 1.84 89 17 06 24415 0.21 121 4788 93 0.00 26 2.239 2335527 37.0 58 6282 112579 

### 1.71 90 17 62 22675 018 122 49.45 66 0.00 27 2.312 2261285 34.4 59 6.487 98402 1.59 91 18.20 20776 016 123 51.07 66 

## o 00 I 28 2.388 2178728 31 9 60 6.700 86589 1.48 92 18.80 18805 

### o 14 124 6274 43 000 

### ! 29 2466 2087743 29 5 61 6.919 76794 1.39 93 19 41 16846 

## o 12 125 54.47 30 0.00 

### ! 30 2.647 1989197 27.2 62 7146 68621 1.31 94 20.05 14960 

## o 10 126 56 25 17 

## o00 

# 1 31 2.630 1885454 25 0 63 7380 61749 1.24 95 20.71 13115 0.08 127 5810 10 0.00 

# ! 32 2717 1778879 23 0 64 7.622 56018 1 17 96 21 39 11501 

## o 07 128 60.00 0 

## o 00

, J i 

## , 1 

# I

35

### Date done: 10:09 31 May 2008 Disk File: 16391**~3Z.HST** Sample 

### #: LOW 3; CKJL3 COMBINE LotIJob 

### #: 16391; 64906,64909 ELZONE<tm> Particle Size Analysis 

### For: GE ENERGY MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC. 1301 

### CORPORATE CENTER DR, SUITE 177 EAGAN, MN 55121 By: 

### PARTICLE TECHNOLOGY 

### LABS, LTD, 555 ROGERS STREET DOWNERS GROVE, IL 60515 Operator: 

### OJ -Comments: VOLUME (mass) DATA Material: 

### Source: AIR EXHAUST MR. BRUCE RANDALL

03 LOG-LINEAR PLOT (RELATIVE> Il'i'Si!I Sample: LOW 3; CKJ1.3 COM 1.000 1380 1.906 2.630 3.631 5.013 6.919 9.652 13.19 18.20 25.13 34.68 47.88 

### D 3 0 

### -l---+-.----f--+---!---+-.,...-J---!-I------!----Jf---4---4-----f-....,
2.7 

# -_······t· ··..

# ··l········J·

..

# ·····J· ····t

....··..l._

..

# -.~ .... -1"-

....... + """ 

## r"--'l-'-r--" F 2.4 

## Iii i i 

### ! 

### ! 

## i ! 

## I i 

# ··......T-

.....'t

..-.. ·,,;·
......

# t

..··..·· i

..·-t·

..

# ·_-t

..· ..'t

.... -1- 

# ·_·r..--·-T·'· V 21 i" I I 

## lL" l ! •••••

## _1.

__.. , 

## o . .-- 

# r
....'i·

..· ..":f10.l7 M 

# fPVt

.... ·f< 

# "'r

.......1"... i' r 

## I 

# b 1.8 

# -t·

..

# ·_·t---·

.. l

...· 

# .-+
...· ....

# +·
..···_+- 

# -i '

--..+.
. +-- ·..

# --i----·

..J·---. M 1.5 

# ----t

......-·..

# t--·--·+----i···-

..-i-·-··t· 

# ·+ ._.**-.-~** 

# ...- ...**~----** E iii Iii I

.. i I P 1.2 , 

## t-·

..-- ..

# I**+-·-·-1·~** 

# ..··..

# +--
--.. ·1-···

..

# -+·
-- 

# -_·-l-- 

# ·-t

..-·-·

. I ! 

### J ! J : 

## ! : i 

### C 0.9

- 

# ·_·-t.-...

# -t-

- .....cr- .--L-"+---'-i""'-" 

### i" 

# .+

_ .._. f"

- ..
-. ----..**-~--** 0".6" 

## L .1 '_.-

. •••.
..... •j--

...... 

### t·

.... 

### I I . I



### Geometric Mean Size: 

### Geom. 

### Std Deviation: Geom, Skewness: 

### Geom. Coeff Variation: Arithmetic Mean Size: Median Size: Mode Size: 

### Kurtosis: Arith Std Deviation 10.84 urn 

### 2.386um -3.168 22,01 

### 14.75 um 14.33 um 18.4Oum 2.044 

### 10.87 urn 

### - PERCENTILES •• 0.100% 

### Volume above t>5.30 

### um 1.000% 

### Volume above 46.21 

### um 6.000% 

### Volume above 

### 31.43 um 22.00% 

### Volume above 21.69 

### um 50.00% 

### Volume above 14.61 

### um 78.00% 

### Volume above 

### 4.640 um 94.00% Volume above 2.359 urn 

### 99.00% Volume 

### above 1.494 

### um 99.90% 

### Volume above 1.106 um



# 36

### ELZONE<tm) Particle Size AnalysiS Date done: 10:09 31 May 2008 For: GE ENERGY MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC. Disk File: 

### 16391-3Z

..HST 1301 CORPORATE CENTER DR, SUITE 177 EAGAN,MN 65121 Sample 

### #: LOW 3; CKJL3 COMBINE By: 

### PARTICLE TECHNOLOGY LABS, LTD. LotIJob 

### #: 16391; 64906,64909 555 ROGERS STREET DOWNERS GROVE, Il 60515 Material: AIR EXHAUST Operator: OJ 

### Source: MR. BRUCE RANDALL Comments: VOLUME (mass) DATA



### -- Volume Distribution Data Total Volm: 2622111967 

### oml Size Voltne 

### emU: aml Size VollJIIe CuIlIlS 

### Chnl Size Volure Cunl: 

### Chnl Size Volune CllmU


# .....- 1 1.000 0 100.0 33 2.806 1.93E7 90.4 65 67.5 97 22.09 5.60El 20.5 2 1033 861688 100 0 34 2898 200£7 89.7 66 670 98 22 81 5.26£7 18 4 3 

### 1.067 1013796 99.9 35 

### 2.993 206£7 889 67 66.5 99 23 56 486£7 16 5 4 1 102 1187857 999 36 3.091 2 llE7 88 1 68 65.9 100 24 33 443E7 14 7 5 1 138 1386087 99.9 37 3192· 216£1 87.3 69 65.4

. 101 25 13 3.97E7 13.1 6 1 175 1611028 99.8 38 3296 2.21E7 86 5 70 648 102 25.95 353E7 117 7 1213 l864813 99 7 39 3.404 224E7 856 71 64.1 103 2680 3.11E7 lOA 8 1.263 2149732 99.7 40 3.516 226£7 848 63. 104 27 68 2.75El 9 32 9 1.294 2467998 99 6 41 363! 221£7 83 9 .7 105 28.58

. 2.43E7 8.33 10 1337 2821698 99.5 42 3.750 227El 83.0 62.0 106 29.52

. 216£7 7.46 11 1380 3212739 994 43 3 873 226£7 82.2 75 2.16£7 612 107 30.49 194E7 6.68 12 1.426 3642844 99 2 44 4000 2.25£7 81.3 76 2.30El 603 108 3149 1.7SE7 5 97 13 1.472 4113442 99 1 45 4 131 2.23E7 80.4 77 247[7 594 109 32.52 1 S8E7 534 14 1 521 4625623 989 46 4 266 2.2G£7 79 6 78 26m 58.5 110 33.58 1.45El 4.76 15 1 570 5180076 98.7 47 4.406 216[7 78.8 79 2.90E7 574 111 34.68 1.34£7 4 23 16 1.622 5777025 98.5 48 4550 2.12E7 78.0 80 3.17El 562 

### 112 35.82 123£7 374 17 1 675 6416165 98.3 49 4.700 2.07El n.2 81 3.4&7 55.0 113 3699 11SE7 3.28 18 1 730 7096747 98.0 50 4.853 201El 764 82 382£7 53.6 114 38.21 1.06£7 286 19 1 787 7817067 97 7 61 5 013 1.95£7 75.6 83 4.21[7 520 115 39.46 9789174 2 47 20 1845 8574531 97.4 52 6.177 1.88£7 74.9 84 4.62E7 50.4 116 40.75 8986418 2 12 21 1 906 9366009 97.1 63 5346 182£7 742 85 504£7 48.5 117 4209 8251991 1 79 22 1 968 1.02[7 967 64 5.522 1.74E7 735 86 5.44E7 465 118 43.46 7391309 1 49 23 2 032 1 10E7 963 55 5.702 167[7 72.9 87 5.81E7 444 119 44.89 6690337 1.22 24 2099 1 19£7 95.9 56 5889 1.60£7 72.2 88 6.12E1 421 120 46.36 6014438 0.98 25 2.168 1.28E7 95.4 57 6082 152E7 716 89 635[7 39 7 121 47 88 5370084 0.76 26 2 239 1. 37E7 94.9 58 6.282 1.46£7 71.1 90 650£7 37 3 122 4945 4194304 058 27 2 312 146E7 943 59 6.487 1 41E7 70.5 91 6.56[7 34.8 123 51 07 4614199 

### o 41 28 2388 1.55£7 93.8

. 60 6.700 1.36£7 70 0 92 6.64El 323 124 52.74 3292600 0.26 29 2.466 1 64E7 93.2 61 6 919 1 33£7 69.5 93 6.45El 298 125 54.47 2572307 0.15 30 2.547 1 72E7 92.5 62 7:146 131E7 69 0 94 631El 274 126 56.25 1572864 0.07 31 2630. 180£7 91 9 63 7.380

. 1.30£7 685 95 612E7 250 127 5810 1048576 

## o 02 32 2.717 187El 91 2 64 7.622 1.30E7 680 96 5.89£7 22.7 128 60.00 0 

## o 00 

# dt- a W'\ 

# (c7**~UA**

# I·fh~ 

# cP3) (0, It}

# ro2~ 

# 1 S: 

### i 

# G3.2- ; 

# {O.O J 

## l F



# 37

### UNIT: DATE: PITOT TUBE CALIBRATION CALIBRATED BY:



### ___"<>"<,,,,,,;,;;' STANDARD PITOT: A SIDE CALIBRATION dPstd RUN No. 

### "H20 1 

### 2 dP(s) 

### "H20

B SIDE CALIBRATION RUN No. dPstd 

### "H20 dP(s) 

### "H20

Cp(B) CP(s) 

### 0.837 0.828 0.828 0.831 DEVIATION Cp(s)-Cp(B) 

### 0.006 0.003

-0.003**--------.-.---------Avg::f)~yi~tiQftt\_must-be_lessihan-or_equaHo.-e~------·--·--------------.--------------------------­** 

### Avg Deviation B must be less than or equal to 

### 0.01 ICp(A)-Cp(B)1 must be less than or equal to 

### 0.01
Avg Deviation (A): Avg Deviation (B): 

### 0.00 0.00 ICp(A)-Cp(B) I Cp



# 38 0.01 0.826

### TYPE S PITOT TUBE lNSPECTION DATA FORM

Pitot tube assembly level? yes 

### no

Pitot tube openings damaged? 

### yes (explain below) 

### no z=Asiny= 0.017 (in.); «0.125 in.)
w=AsinO=**0~099** 

### (in.); «0.03125 in.)


### (in.) 

### PA 

## = 0.475 (in.), PB 

## = 0.475 (in.), 

### Dt 

## =



# -- , 

### (in.)

Calibration required? --!-yes no 

## Pitot Repair/Calibration Required
Pitot Tube No.: _ _.- - _.

### Date::::;~ ..

### i:ii;,~14ii.~n~:~::;:' 

## .':

. Name:

, /" 

# r:

# 1---------- 1:l!J 

# LI----_____=::: 

# \j A 

## 1fj;

# .'r---~-:- v..6_______ :; :'

, 

## ..

# _ . -------_.. 

# . , , , : '

NOTE: 

# C

· 05**~<Pf** <1.50 0 P A = PB 0.48 CM**~Df ~0.95**  CM (3/16 IN.) (3/8 IN.)

, , 

# . ,

, TRANSVERSE. :

### ---V--A-6ffBE-3-------!!!!!-E--~!~~~-----Fi------ 1 F"ACE : :.**OPENING'~** : PLANES:
, 

# . 

# . ,

# '%WIT~~"l·**~5f------** A "\**~_----.**


# ---**7---~----**

(11

B F"Low1 - A

. -----·---------c**-----r-~** 

# --------- '-(11 

# e----·------.-}---.---

.____ B .**::-:}_~** __• A 

## "'}Pl -.--'--' 

## ------ ------

..·z :f H



## ------- VA

---

# -----E-3-.;-

---

Pitot Calibration Form 

# fi**,~.;;h**
• • , I I' It' • I , • I I I I,

• I I I ., "

### TRANSVERSE~:: j

### ~::. 

# i IlIeE AXIS

__ '
m 

### !l.. ' _

,. I I 

## ., 

# . " , ., , ., 

# . 

# '.

, " 

# . 

# . , " , ,. , ,. 

# . " 

# . " , " 

# . 39 GE Energy

### dP(s) "H20


### 2 3 RUN No. 

## 1 PITOT TUBE CALIBRATION UNIT:**ir.Q~~,'J;~;i';!;~0i?;Ei:;:;** 

### CALIBRATED BY: DATE:

### ~~~f,Q'~l.9'~;i:j"y STANDARD PITOT: A SIDE CALIBRATION

B SIDE CALIBRATION dPstd dP(s) RUN No. "H20 "H20**~;"'1::-----h==== "':'.'rl--~~j-L-""""'~~-;**  

### 2 

### 3



## -.----.---..**----~vg** 

## ..**DevlatK>nf\~le-ss1tran-ore__quattCT()~()1--------------.-.------~----.--.----.----.--.--­** 

### Avg Deviation B must be less than or equal to 0.01 ICp(A)-Cp(B)1 must be less than or equal to 0.01
Avg Deviation (A): Avg Deviation (B): 

### 0.00 0.00 ICp(A)-Cp(B) 

# I Cp 

### 0.00 0.827



# 40

### TYPE S PITOT TUBE INSPECTION DATA FORM

Pitottube aSsembly level? yes no
Pitottube openings damaged? yes (explain below)
z=Asiny= 0.017 (in.); 

### «0.125 in.)



### w=Asine= 0.066 (in.); «0.03125 in.)


### (in.) (in.)



### Calibration required? 

# ....!-yes no



# --- PitotRepair/Calibration Required
PitotTube No.:

o'Yo r-:



# .. o.

:

_

..._

......

## ----- 

# l'i



# .. :**~:** A

o 

### Name:

Pitot Calibration Form NOTE: 

# C

.05 l\<P, <1.50 0 P A 

## = P B 0.48 CM**~D, ~0.95**  CM (3/16 IN.) (3/8 IN.)

o o

, , TRANSVERSE. :

### ---V--A"6ir-BE-?7-------~!lE-~~~~:-'~----F=Ef------



# . , : FACE:

OPENING : PLANES: 

# . . , 

# . 

# 17 ,.**:.~./** 

# n

I' 'I I' • t' I I

" I " II

# WVm'_~-----~----~-------.

I , • • I r • I I • I I I , I I I • • I I • • I
• , I t I I • , I I I I I • • • 

# 4:1 

# 8 ---- -----.--J-.----.- 

## B --_ !2

----- _._._----------- A

_ __

### ::J!~ 

# _

('Z
rr------=-_ " 

# -------h------

u 

# (-3-

# s ----

GE EnergyControl Module No. Standard MeterNo. Standard Meter (Yr) E48 13124821

1.001 : ! 

### Pre Test DG¥ Calibration

Date: Calibrated By: Barometric Pressure: 3/5/08 

### MH 29.20

I i i I Orifice Orifice Standard Meter Control Module Standard Meter

# ~ct";:'~ Dry Gas Meter Dry Gas Meter Setting in. H2O Setting in. H2O Volume DGMVolume Temp.F Outlet Temp. F Avg. Temp.F Time Time Run Number (set value) (read value) Vr Vd tr i tdi tdo td Min. Sec. y**~H@** I i I

Initial 40.844 660.812 68 73 71 Final 44.685 664.669 68 I 73 71 Difference 1 

# I 0.81 0.80 3.841 3.857 68 I 73 71 721 71 30 

# I 1.001 

# I 1.734 Initial 35.163 655.1l1 68 I 73 71 Final 40.375 660.345 68 74 71 Difference 2 

# I 1.6\ 1.60 5.212 5.234 68 73.5 71 72.25\ 7\ 30 

# I 1.000 

# I 1.883 Initial 28.079 648.033 68 73 71 Final 2.41 34.559 654.519 68 74 71 Difference 3 

# I 2.40 6.480 6.486 68 73.5 '71 72.251 71 30 

## I 1.001 1 1.827 

### I I Specifications: CFR 40. Part 60, Appendix A, Method 5, section 10.3.1. Calibration Before Use. I Pre Test Calibration Factor (Y) 1.001 1.815 

# i

,**~.** 

## N

QE Enorgy E4S-0305200S.xlsRun Time (min): Vm (dcf): 

## T

m

## rR): Pbar ("Hg): l\Havg ("H20): Md: Orifice AH@I: MeterYi: Yqa: Calibration Status: Method 5 Post Test Calibration Low 

### 2

60 36.384 531.46 27.76 1.19 30.46 1.815 1.001 1.017 Pass 

### 51712008 Meter

### #: Low 

### 4 Low 

### 6

60 60 36.201 37.042 532.42 532.92 27.76 27.76 1.17 1.24 30.44 30.44 1.815 1.815 1.001 1.001 1.014 1.022 E48Low 

### 8 60 37.531 

### 534.54 27.76 1.26 30.43 1.815 1.001 1.017



# 43 Average



### 1.001 1.018Date: Calibrated By: Barometric Pressure : Control Module No•. Standard MeterNo. Standard Meter (Yr) E56 13124821

1.001 

# I Pre Test

# DGk Calibration ! 

## ! 

## I ! 03/07/2008 TS 29.75

Run Number Orifice Setting in. H20

(set value) Orifice Setting in. H2 0 (read value) Standard Meter Volume

Vr Control Module DGMVolume Vd Standard Meter Temp.F tr Dry Gas Meter Inlet Temp. F tdi Dry Gas Meter OutletTemp. 

### F tdo Dry Gas Meter Avg. Temp. F td Time Min. Time Sec. Y AH@

I Initial 181.392 77.676 65 1 74 70
, Final 1 

# I 0.81 185.202 81.473. 65 75 70 72.251 71 30 

# I 1.0151 Difference 0.80 3.810 3.797 65 74.5 70 1.709 Initial 170,447 66.715 65 73 69 I Final 1.61 175.810 72.104 65 I 75 70 Difference 2 1 1.60 5.363 5.389 65 74 69.5 71.751 71 30 

# I 1.004\ 1.727 Initial 158.575 54.740 65 70 69 Final 2.41 165.078 61.319 65 74 69 70.51 71 30'1 0.9931 Difference 3 

# I 2.40 6.503 6.579 65 I 72 69 1.766 I Specifications: CFR40, Part 60, Appendix A, Method 5, section 10.3.1. Calibration Before Use. 

## I Pre Test Calibration Factor (Y) 1.004 1.734

I**~.**

GE Enotgy E56·03072008.xls

### Run Time (min): Vm 

### (dcf): 

## .T

m

## rR): Pbar 

### ("Hg): l\.Havg 

### ("H2

### 0): Md: Orifice 

### AH@I: MeterYi: Yqa: Calibration Status: Method 5 Post Test Calibration Low 

### 1



### 60 35.542 532

..79 27.76

1.08 30.45 1.734 1.004 1.016 Pass 

### 51712008 Meter

### #: ·Low3 Low 

### 5



### 60 60 35.934 35.594 535:92 535.50 27.76 27.76 1.09 1.09 30.47 30.45 1.734 1.734 1.004 1.004 1.012 1.023



# 4S E56Low 

### 7 

### 60 35.652 536.75 27;76

1.09 30.45 1.734 1.004 1.021 Average



### 1.004 1.018

### FSR 

### #: M22A0427 Method Used: 17 :**L..~** 

### f

¢:S 

# g-/7/Q-!" 

# t;,-'7- C 

# e <::l:J .q -f

## O~ 

# .e.!1'" Run Date:**-ie=~~",,=:::::£...::::** 

### Test Run #:

_



### 2S.0ft

or Downstream



# ----- Vertical

or Diameter:



# ------ 

# W Check here if same test parameters are the same as recorded for

## prevlo~s run - make changes as necessary

Company: Minnkota Power ' DJct Shape (select): Rectangular

• ! 

### Plant: Unit 2\ Length: Test Location: Stack 

# ± Width: Source Condition: MID 

### 0 

### ct Area (sq. feet): 490.873 Test Engineer: 

# r: Sm**~v~** 

### OJ urbance (In diameters): Upstream Temp 

### ID: $a pie Plane (select): C8o'rizonffij) Meter 

### 10: ,£'$(, 

### Prt length:**""",5~'_~_** 

### Meter calibration' Factors: Y

# =**/~uoi.llli.@l** 

# = ('; 73. 

## 't P rt Inside Diameter:

### ~&l.o!'~"'--'-' 

### _ Pitot 

### 10:**tJ~** 

### 2 Prt Type:**...:F~la:;..:.:n:.;;z.ge=--** 

### _ Pitot Cp: N mber of Ports Sampled: ....;F:..;:o:.;:u::..r

_ Probe Length: 

### "'9 ft N mber of Points per Port: _Th.:..:.::.;re:::.::e=--

_ Probe Liner Material SS

. Mi utes per Point: 

## ---l-S-=::.-

_ Nozzle Diameter (In.): 1f9tal # ofTraverse Points: Twelve Train setup: Method 

### 17**1T~st** 

### Length (min): 

## -...:<'e=CJ

_ I

\

### 'O"~Y 1;5'</ 

### Final Wt



# =rze ·4**l~'O** 

## C021.'**006.~** 

## 1**6l.~** 

## e:. ,8

. 

## '.,..----

_____ /7D 

### ,lc

Tare 

### wt: Tare 

### wt: .0 scription of imph'lger liquid: 

### SI ca gel spent?: S MPLE COLL 

### CTION 

### imble#:

## FiI~er #: 

## C,e?-20'C;7 MbISTURE DETERMINATION

# ~. pinger # Tare 

### wt., J 

# .-J 1 . 

## 11'"'(

# to 

# -1 2 

# 1 t.-{ 

### /,0 -<

I, 

### 3. 

# 30

..}S \ 4 

## 1<ffl

## ,2) ,j 

### STACK CQNpmONS 

### Barometric Pressure ("Hg): 

## -Z 7- 7 b Static Pressure ("H20): Flue Pressure ("Hg): Sample Train Leak Check: Pre: 

### !pt"Ili;-Post: 100 

# <t @ 

# &. ''I-Ig 

## .!! .,' II J/ 

# 3 r1

# d1z-. Pitot Leak Check: Pre:

.**~'-** 

### Post carbon Dioxide 

### (%): 

### /2\ 

## c;- Oxygen 

### (%):

.

# 7t 

# '3 Method 

### 3 technique: Orsat Fryrite Analyzer Fuel Type: Fd Factor: Fc Factor: COMMENTS: I



# 5 

# ftArt-./ frd-- GE Energy- Form 1053

### 5MIi'~I/r 

## , )(:;-. I, 'z",c, 

# "J" FIELD TEST DAtA SHEET
- ISOKINETIC SAMPUNG Test Method Used: 17**~=.** 

### ---::'l L_ ./ 

## I .- ,.-1'7/C

## J' Test Run No. 

# 7i?7 MI'-tJt..,- .vP'(.A/ I....:; I 

### Date:

### ~4-e. V Traverse Sheet 

## 1- of FSR#: -.:...:M=22=-A=.04..:.::2:::..7**---o._~** __ 

### Company/Plant: Mlnnkota Power i 

### UnitfTest Location:**_U::.;n:..::.lt.:..;2::..:.Sta==ck.:...~** ..i..._

__



### 08Z()**Oflz~ ()~30**  I y(

. 1 w2 I -/-rr...c .'ry ; I .;**i~-"** I """7 .; I -.; ",.. I 7LLC- 1-

### lJIr3~, 

### I -I- I· '-0:;>' 

### lrq**~\f+** 

### I caZ!h" 

### I -I 

### 1- -.- 

# '- I 

# I I: , j 

## I 

# I I I
, 

## Ztlff 

# - - frO, 

## 8 2'T'S"' 

# - -**~(** 

# 3 z. t./s- 

# .- 

# - G?"L .3



# - =t=t=**~3** -I 

# ?2.. 

# I (,3

' Z-A//) 10G1/7 I 

# - I- I ./ 7 S Xs;;tl \ I 

# - I 

# - I- I- 1-1·'-- 1- 

## ",.1 I 'I : 

## I ()qt.3 2'-{ 

# - - .3 

# z.. ()**:z~** 

# 2Y¥ 

# - - !3 3 b9'33 i 

## "Z'fG"' 

# - - .3 ?-/VIO**OC}5~** 

# ..---**~'** 

# ---- - '--'" 

# -

=Data does not get entered In Excel

# 5:·~.2~!Pf 

# (\2 f.2Q7S- ;., \':":,' l"Jy _. r
... :I; 'I:; GE Energy- F0ll111026

### FSR 

### #: M22A0427 Method Used: 17 .' I \ 

## ((J'''''.2... '**~_-,** 

## __**C-~** 

# -D'rL, Test Run 

### #: 

# %A,td 6 Run Date:

## -b-~=4~

Round 25.0 

### ft

or _____ Downstream Vertical 490.873 Upstream Horizontal Check here If same test parameters are the same as recorded for

### previo~s run -makechanges as necessary " Company: Mlnnkbta Power

## DU~ Shape (select): ,Rectangular or Plant: Unit 2 

## I Length: Diameter: Test Location: Stack 

# I Width: I 

### Source Condition:

. 

# OUt Area (sq. feet): Test Engineer: 

# A 

# Phrlllp::} Di turbance (in diameters): Temp 

### ID: Sa pie Plane (select): Meter 

### ID: 

# e-q8**PO~** length: Meter calibration Factors: 

### Y

# =**l~a:;/** l\H@1 

# = (_ref)

# po~ Inside Diameter: Pitot 

### ID: 

## oSUllt

.**po~** Type:

### .....:F~la=n=ge=--_· _ Pitot Cp: 

### 0. 

# eqo Number of Ports Sampled: Four Probe Length: 

### "'9 

### ft

## ~uh,ber of Points per Port:

## ....;T:...;:h:;.::;r:.:..ee------~- Probe Liner Material

. SS MiTutes per Point: Nozzle Diameter (In.): 

## 6. Z/I TPfal # 

### of Traverse Points: Twelve Train Setup: Method 

### 17**Te~t** 

### Length (min): 

### MepISTURE DETERMINATION

.scription of Impinger liquid:**~11** 

### ca gel spent?: 

### S PtE COLLECTION 111imble 

### #:

### FiI~er #: .' 

# {ac-z.. -Z£J"? 

# i ! 

### STACK CONDITIONS Barometric Pressure ("Hg): 

# 21.1 (p Static Pressure ("H20):

- 

# I( Z. 

# I: Flue Pressure ("Hg): \ 

## 00 Sample Train Leak Check:' Pre:

## e'j~ Post: tOO 

### 2. @ 

# (0 "Hg Pitot Leak Check: Pre: 

# e ct '5- Post

_ Carbon Dioxide 

### (%):

.

## tl,-;?:::....'...:~:...· --- 

### Oxygen 

### (%): 

# 1,t-. Method 

### 3 technique: Orsat Fryrlte Analyzer Fuel Type: Fd Factor: Fc Factor: 

### COMMENTS:

# 5~l~ 

# Iff 

# _3'_ner # ,) 2,

T 

### I 3 

### j 

### 4

# ~1-- , I

• i 

# I Tare 

## wt. 

# 7,54.zJ lete,.5-·**<O~'1,' ~C17·S** 

Tare 

## wt: Tare 

## wt: Final Wt 

# o/<l'B"O ISV2_ 

# t7 cJ7', I**C(,~?r** 

### 12.. 

# ?<{O",:3 If 6**fiJ55""~** 0 -,. 

# z..

o,{(o1

GE Energy

- Form 1053

### FIELD TEST DATA SHEET
- ISOKINEnC SAMPUNG Test Method Used: _1=7

_ Test Run

## ~o. . 

# 7Sir;rl3 

# !=ti g 

# low 2. Date:

.

## 5-~-08' • Traverse Sheet of

_ FSR#: 

### _M:..:=;:22=.A.;=.O..:,:42::.:.7

_ 

### Company/Plant: Minnkota Power 

# .....:-.------------------.....---------- Unit/Test Location: _U-",-n;.;.;i",-t.;;;;.2.,;;;;.S.,;;;;ta:;.:;ck=-

_

i.(**~{** 

### $'1 

# ,.. 247 '2..i.ts 

### 2 

## '17 ( 7S"' 

## I 

## 7 I 

## I 

## '7() I '2. 

## '1 

## 7

. 

## I I I 5"3 

# l '7 

# i.f I 7j 

## I 

## 71 I '2.. 

## l.f 

## 7 I I I 5" (**'~75'** 

## 1'72- 

## 17/ I ?1.f7 

## I I 150 3 

# z. f)(

# ~IIJljcL7 

# I V. I
I

# I~' 

# '" I**'7;~',i7~** 

# I

! 

### to. 

# I' I 

# I" ··1- 1'\ 

# t=1-**~I'** 11



### . . = Data 

### does not get.entered in 

### Excel

.. ".

. .. . . .'
. " .. 

### ..,:.
(

. 't'**~.;.**

# 3~~~~ 

# IP51'·:·" ":'>.: 

# X"< /,c:( 

# 1Je, ;. ,;:: "**r'·'~1** _. F'" q; "I:" GE Energy

- Form 1026

### Method Used: 

### 17 

# --=-----+---- FSR 

### #: M22A0427 Test Run 

### #: 

# Low'3 Run Date: 

# 5 ( 7 I (J 

# 6

_____ Downstream

or Vertical or

_____ Diameter: _2=5:.:,.O::;...:..:ft_-_ 

# l;l.I' Check here If same test parameters are the same as recorded for

## previoJ~ run - make changes as necessary

Company: Minnkota Power Ouch: Shape (select): Rectangular Plant: Unit 2 

### j Length: Test Location: Stack 

### j . Width: Source Condition:

### 1..,~ DUf Area (sq. feet): Test Engineer: 

# j**~:::)!~** 

## V Di,

. urbance (In diameters): Temp ID: Sa, pie Plane (select): Meter ID: 

# e-s-c" POltt 

# t

length: Meter calibration Factors: Y

# = I· 

## cot .aH@I:=' 

### I, '7? 

# "I Po. Inside Diameter:

### _(,,~,_Y _ 

### Pitot ID:**~]** C;"**P~** 

### Type: -:F:..:;la::;.;n:.;;z.ge=--

_ Pitot Cp: Nu ber of Ports Sampled:**...;F;...;o~u,,-r** 

### _ Probe Length: "'9 ft**N~** 

### ber of Points per Port:**_T~h:.:.;re:;;:e:.....;,.** 

### _ Probe Liner Material SS M,I utes per Pqint: 

## _5_"

_ Nozzle Diameter (in.): Tp at 

### # ofTraverse Points: Twelve Train Setup: Method 17

# Tb~t length (min):

# --l:l&:;...(J~ __

# ~(~f 

# (cuke!**l~** 

# rf**~01** jv(tfV1' 

# eve 

# ;jft 5**vtA~'lA** 

# /,PrI Analyzer 

# 27./b -(·2 

## CJ1 

# o STACK CONDmONS Barometric Pressure ("Hg): Static Pressure ("H20): Flue Pressure ("Hg): Sample Train Leak Check: Pre:, 

### c:oV 7" Post: , tJo

### c.f ::>I-I!J" i (I 

### Pitot Leak Check: Pre:**~~** 

### Post 

## S Carbon Dioxide 

### (%): 

# l2. Oxygen 

### (%): 

# 1· 

# '1- Method 3 technique: Orsat Fryrite Fuel Type: Fd Factor: Fe Factor: 

### COMMENTS; 

# .@---': ''Hg ",'ISTURE DETERMINATION**I~,**

# ,rnger # 

## Tare wt. , 1 

# 749,u

: 2

. -( 

### (PO

.

## Go 

# -,-1 3 

# 'Gz(

# ·1 : 1 

### 4 

## 65 G/ , 

### ,,::> , 1 11


# q scription of impinger liquid: 

## $1 ca gel spent?: 

# S MPLE COLLE ON Tt1imble 

### #:

### FiI~er #: 

# G0 2**-2~** 

## I i 

### . Final Wt 

## crQc..{ 1

# cs- I 

# r.r:)' 023.3 8.7 

# 7b9,i /''1**zCR2.~** 

## 8.'-

Tare 

### wt: Tare 

### wt: 

### 0 . ( 

# (7 ":)-

GE Energy

- Fonn 1053

### ::J> #'IIPI / 

## j? 

# I-' 

# It::: /, '2 (, .§"

";,' ",


# z. '''2.- 

### of 

# -' FIELD TEST DATA SHEET - ISOKINETIC SAMPUNG 

### Test Method Used: 

### ....;1=.:.7.--_=-_ Test Run No. 

# Low'3 Date: 

### $" 

## (71 (J

# e Traverse Sheet FSR#: ....;M;..:;2=2;:;..;A;.:;:..04..:..;;;2;.;;..7

_ Company/Plant: Mlnnkota Power 

# -----------'---------..,..-- Unit/Test Location: _U:::;.;n:.:.:l;..t=.2.=S.:;;ta:.;::ck:..:..- -:-

_



### &/v, 

# B J 

## Z 

## S**~L;:'** 

# --

2Lf7 

# - - 'Yel oS Z. 

## LfS- 

# - - 't'tJ 

# .? 2.'-13 

# - - z;e; 

# .3



# - 

# - 

# -,**"'''~** 

### '7'S""**z~** 

# .- 

# - SI 

## :3 

# 7S- Z.fo/- 

# - '- .s7J :3

, 1'

__ 

# . '

.. 

## 7S- "2,/$ 

## 5"0 

## .5 

# - 

# -


# - G: /
£,vtCJ3 

# z.


# ull\.i2**~.l** 

## . 1-: I ". I'

..... I--L-'

....... - •



### = Data does not get entered In Excel



# .,**'''9j~!tf ~../..~**  L

# c.~ . -d' 

# -r'/" .r-. v 

## 1'_-

. ....".- ,.(,i1.". 7 • . J 

### /1' GE Energy

- Form 1026