alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §499k. Injunctions; application of injunction laws governing orders of Interstate Commerce Commission

For the purposes of this chapter the provisions of all laws relating to the suspending or restraining of the enforcement, operation, or execution, or the setting-aside, in whole or in part, of the orders of the Interstate Commerce Commission are made applicable to orders of the Secretary under this chapter and to any person subject to the provisions of this chapter.

(June 10, 1930, ch. 436, §11, 46 Stat. 535.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 561 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Abolition of Interstate Commerce Commission and Transfer of Functions

Interstate Commerce Commission abolished and functions of Commission transferred, except as otherwise provided in Pub. L. 104–88, to Surface Transportation Board effective Jan. 1, 1996, by section 1302 of Title 49, Transportation, and section 101 of Pub. L. 104–88, set out as a note under section 1301 of Title 49. References to Interstate Commerce Commission deemed to refer to Surface Transportation Board, a member or employee of the Board, or Secretary of Transportation, as appropriate, see section 205 of Pub. L. 104–88, set out as a note under section 1301 of Title 49.
Exhibit 31.2**Certification****Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes — Oxley Act of 2002**I, Greenfield Pitts, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Emerson Radio Corp.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;andc) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and
30

 
 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions):a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; andb) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     Date:  August 14, 2007/s/  Greenfield Pitts  Greenfield Pitts
### Session I: Creating Institutional 

### Structures for Community Level IPM Karl Malamud - Roam, IR - 4 Project John Carroll, USDA

## The Vector Control Paradigm

• Reducing contact between vectors and people reduces transmission of pathogens, and thus reduces human disease • Disease vectors cross property lines, and are therefore community problems • While repellents and other individual actions can help, they are rarely enough to stop disease outbreaks

## The Vector Control Paradigm (II)

• Protecting communities from vectors and vector- borne diseases often requires community- wide integrated action • Vector eradication is rarely possible, but effective vector control can reduce disease • Integrated Vector Management (IVM) uses surveillance, exclusion, and biological and chemical control tools as appropriate

## Learning from Mosquito Control

• For over 100 years, publicly funded vector control programs, using chemical and non chemical tools, have protected us from mosquito - borne diseases such as malaria, yellow fever, and West Nile Virus. • Can this model work to protect us from Lyme Disease and other tick- borne diseases?

## Major Questions 1. Do we know enough to recommend vector control by local governments as a strategy to reduce the risk of Lyme and other tick - borne diseases ? In what conditions?

## Major Questions 2. What needs to be done to develop, evaluate, and promote these recommendations? Who will do this? 3. What research is needed to determine which control options will be cost - effective in which conditions? How should we measure effectiveness?
#### CATLIN, Appellant, v. REA et al., Respondents.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

October 27, 1903.)

Action by Harriet N. Catlin against Samuel- Rea and another.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. See 71 N. Y. Supp. 1177.

STOVER, J., not voting.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Donald C. Wood, the President and Chief Executive Officer of Federal Realty Investment Trust (the Company), has executed this certification in connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange
Commission of the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2007 (the Report). The undersigned hereby certifies that:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                 |  |  |  |                                               
|---------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------
|October 31, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/ DONALD C. WOOD                            
|                 |  |  |  | Donald C. Wood,                               
|                 |  |  |  | President, Chief Executive Officer and Trustee
|                 |  |  |  | (Principal Executive Officer)
### §1573. Immigration Services and Infrastructure Improvements Account

#### (a) Authority of the Attorney General

The Attorney General shall take such measures as may be necessary to—

(1) reduce the backlog in the processing of immigration benefit applications, with the objective of the total elimination of the backlog 1 year after November 25, 2002;

(2) make such other improvements in the processing of immigration benefit applications as may be necessary to ensure that a backlog does not develop after such date; and

(3) make such improvements in infrastructure as may be necessary to effectively provide immigration services.

#### (b) Authorization of appropriations

#### (1) In general

There is authorized to be appropriated to the Department of Justice from time to time such sums as may be necessary for the Attorney General to carry out subsection (a).

#### (2) Designation of account in treasury

Amounts appropriated pursuant to paragraph (1) may be referred to as the "Immigration Services and Infrastructure Improvements Account".

#### (3) Availability of funds

Amounts appropriated pursuant to paragraph (1) are authorized to remain available until expended.

#### (4) Limitation on expenditures

None of the funds appropriated pursuant to paragraph (1) may be expended until the report described in section 1574(a) of this title has been submitted to Congress.

(Pub. L. 106–313, title II, §204, Oct. 17, 2000, 114 Stat. 1263; Pub. L. 107–296, title IV, §458, Nov. 25, 2002, 116 Stat. 2201.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2002—Subsec. (a)(1). Pub. L. 107–296 substituted "1 year after November 25, 2002;" for "not later than one year after October 17, 2000;".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2002 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 107–296 effective 60 days after Nov. 25, 2002, see section 4 of Pub. L. 107–296, set out as an Effective Date note under section 101 of Title 6, Domestic Security.

#### Abolition of Immigration and Naturalization Service and Transfer of Functions

For abolition of Immigration and Naturalization Service, transfer of functions, and treatment of related references, see note set out under section 1551 of this title.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED
STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                           9,373
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   95,570
<ALLOWANCES>                                       768
<INVENTORY>                                    109,759
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               233,382
<PP&E>                                         182,191
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0<F1>
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 460,877
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           77,697
<BONDS>                                        128,559
<COMMON>                                        18,047
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     197,741
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   460,877
<SALES>                                        246,204<F2>
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               246,204
<CGS>                                          182,347<F2>
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  182,347
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                41,121
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,883
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 10,058
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,118
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,940
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,940
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.51
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.51
<FN>
<F1>This amount is not disclosed in the financial statements and thus a value of
zero has been shown for purposes of this financial data schedule.
<F2>These line items include certain amounts related to non-tangible products
(i.e.,) services, however, since the amounts related to services are not
dislosed in the financial statements, the total revenue and CGS figures,
respectively, have been shown on these line items for purposes of this
financial data schedule.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1556 

Supporting the designation of October as ‘‘Foster Youth Voice Month’’ and 

encouraging public awareness and participation in events and initiatives 

organized by youth in foster care. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 29, 2024 

Mr. NUNN of Iowa submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 

the Committee on Education and the Workforce 

RESOLUTION 

Supporting the designation of October as ‘‘Foster Youth 

Voice Month’’ and encouraging public awareness and 

participation in events and initiatives organized by youth 

in foster care. 

Whereas the voices of young people who have experienced foster care are crucial in shaping policies and practices that 

affect their lives and those of their peers; 

Whereas, since the Selfless Love Foundation initiated the 

first ‘‘Foster Youth Voice Month’’ in 2019, organizations 

in more than 35 States have participated to empower 

young people in foster care to advocate for themselves 

and drive systemic change; 

Whereas Foster Youth Voice Month, celebrated annually in 

October, promotes awareness and highlights the experiVerDate Sep 11 2014 21:59 Oct 29, 2024 Jkt 059200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6300 E:\BILLS\HR1556.IH HR1556

ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1556 IH 

ences, needs, and achievements of young people impacted 

by the foster care system in the United States; 

Whereas an estimated 391,000 youth and young adults are 

impacted by the foster care system annually in the 

United States, facing unique challenges and barriers to 

stability and success; 

Whereas recognizing Foster Youth Voice Month nationally 

will encourage dialogue, collaboration, and support for 

initiatives focused on cocreating solutions that improve 

outcomes for young people in foster care; and 

Whereas the Selfless Love Foundation and other advocates 

across the United States have achieved significant policy 

victories and systems changes, demonstrating how lived 

experience informs and improves laws and policies, thereby reducing unintended harmful consequences: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) supports the designation of ‘‘Foster Youth 

3 Voice Month’’ and encourages public awareness and 

4 participation in events and initiatives organized by 

5 youth in foster care; 

6 (2) acknowledges the contributions and resil7 ience of youth in foster care and urges Federal rec8 ognition of Foster Youth Voice Month as an official 

9 awareness month; 

10 (3) acknowledges and celebrates policy victories 

11 and systems changes driven by young people with 

12 lived experience in foster care, and urges legislative 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 1556 IH 

1 bodies to recognize the value of lived experience in 

2 crafting laws and policies to improve outcomes for 

3 youth in foster care; and 

4 (4) respectfully requests that the Clerk of the 

5 House of Representatives transmit an enrolled copy 

6 of this resolution to the Selfless Love Foundation. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
### §96. Punishment for violation of prohibition

Any person willfully violating any provision of section 95 of this title shall, on conviction, be punished for each offense by a fine not exceeding $5,000 or by imprisonment for not exceeding one year, or both.

(Mar. 3, 1923, ch. 217, §6, 42 Stat. 1436.)
§ 257.5 Responsibilities. The following responsibilities may not be redelegated: ( a ) The *General Counsel, Department of Defense,* shall accept service of process for the OSD.
( b ) The *Secretary of the Army,* or his designee, the *Chief, Litigation Division,* Office of the Judge Advocate General, shall accept service of process for the Department of the Army.
( c ) The *Secretary of the Navy,* or his designee, the *General Counsel,* shall accept service of process for the Department of the Navy.
( d ) The *Secretary of the Air Force,* or his designee, the *Chief, General Litigation Division,* Office of the Judge Advocate General, shall accept service of process for the Department of the Air Force.
#### 1327.404-5 Unauthorized, omitted, or incorrect markings.

The designee authorized to concur with the contracting officer's determination that markings are not authorized is set forth in CAM 1301.70.
Mr. Byron K. Huffman 

December 8, 2015 

Page Three 

The State of Hawaii believes that the rebate and credit program is a permissible "airport-related" 

use of aviation fuel tax revenues and that it is in compliance with the Revenue Use Policy and 

the Revenue Use Policy Amendment. If the FAA determines that the program is not a 

permissible use of non-exempt aviation fuel tax revenues, however, the State of Hawaii will 

promptly prepare an "action plan" to remedy any deficiencies. The Department of 

Transportation will fully cooperate with the FAA and provide it with any further information it 

requires to determine whether the program described above is compliant with the FAA's 

Revenue Use Policy. 

If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact our office. 

With warmest regards, 

~ -'d 

Governor, 

David Y. lge 

State 

~ of Hawaii 

c: Mr. James. T. Brown, Federal Aviation Administration
Case: 1:11-cv-09299 Document #: 68 Filed: 03/22/13 Page 1 of 24 PageID #:1049
Case: 1:11-cv-09299 Document #: 68 Filed: 03/22/13 Page 2 of 24 PageID #:1050
Case: 1:11-cv-09299 Document #: 68 Filed: 03/22/13 Page 3 of 24 PageID #:1051
Case: 1:11-cv-09299 Document #: 68 Filed: 03/22/13 Page 4 of 24 PageID #:1052
Case: 1:11-cv-09299 Document #: 68 Filed: 03/22/13 Page 5 of 24 PageID #:1053
Case: 1:11-cv-09299 Document #: 68 Filed: 03/22/13 Page 6 of 24 PageID #:1054
Case: 1:11-cv-09299 Document #: 68 Filed: 03/22/13 Page 7 of 24 PageID #:1055
Case: 1:11-cv-09299 Document #: 68 Filed: 03/22/13 Page 8 of 24 PageID #:1056
Case: 1:11-cv-09299 Document #: 68 Filed: 03/22/13 Page 9 of 24 PageID #:1057
Case: 1:11-cv-09299 Document #: 68 Filed: 03/22/13 Page 10 of 24 PageID #:1058
Case: 1:11-cv-09299 Document #: 68 Filed: 03/22/13 Page 11 of 24 PageID #:1059
Case: 1:11-cv-09299 Document #: 68 Filed: 03/22/13 Page 12 of 24 PageID #:1060
Case: 1:11-cv-09299 Document #: 68 Filed: 03/22/13 Page 13 of 24 PageID #:1061
Case: 1:11-cv-09299 Document #: 68 Filed: 03/22/13 Page 14 of 24 PageID #:1062
Case: 1:11-cv-09299 Document #: 68 Filed: 03/22/13 Page 15 of 24 PageID #:1063
Case: 1:11-cv-09299 Document #: 68 Filed: 03/22/13 Page 16 of 24 PageID #:1064
Case: 1:11-cv-09299 Document #: 68 Filed: 03/22/13 Page 17 of 24 PageID #:1065
Case: 1:11-cv-09299 Document #: 68 Filed: 03/22/13 Page 18 of 24 PageID #:1066
Case: 1:11-cv-09299 Document #: 68 Filed: 03/22/13 Page 19 of 24 PageID #:1067
Case: 1:11-cv-09299 Document #: 68 Filed: 03/22/13 Page 20 of 24 PageID #:1068
Case: 1:11-cv-09299 Document #: 68 Filed: 03/22/13 Page 21 of 24 PageID #:1069
Case: 1:11-cv-09299 Document #: 68 Filed: 03/22/13 Page 22 of 24 PageID #:1070
Case: 1:11-cv-09299 Document #: 68 Filed: 03/22/13 Page 23 of 24 PageID #:1071
Case: 1:11-cv-09299 Document #: 68 Filed: 03/22/13 Page 24 of 24 PageID #:1072
#### 1322.103 Overtime.
Junction City Wire l-larness Inc. 

>!l(! ;-£v •; 

September 16, 2010 

^^!i TMyj , 4 ,,^33 

PD. Box 45 

1CX32 N. Perry 

Junction Gcy, Kansas 

BB441-0045 

Phone: (785} 7B2^40 0 

Fax: (785j 7B2-3B37 

Susan L. tCurland 

Assistant Secretary for Aviation and International Affairs 

US Department of Transportation 

W86-334 

1200 New Jersey Ave, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Re: Support of Monhiottan, Kansas, in the Small Community Air Service Development 

Program Grant Application 

Ms. Kurland; 

As a business owner who relies heavily on air travel to make the necessary personal 

connections to our customers, I am in full support of the Manhattan Regional Airport's 

application for funding under the SCASD Program. This grant would allow our regional 

airport to expand the service it offers in support of local commerce. 

While our local economy has been somewhat insulated from the effects of the recent 

notional recession, in no way has It been immune to the overall impact. Regional jet 

service to the ManhoUan Airport has played a significant role in creating and stabilizing 

our job market and the demand for our products and services originating from within 

our region. We hope that through the award of this grant, the continued growth of 

reliable and convenient air service to critical destinations will further enhance our 

regional economy by building on the strong connections between national and 

international customers. 

Thank you in advance for your consideration. 

Todd Sliski 

Vice-President of Operations 

Junction City Wire Harness
### §§221 to 227. Repealed. June 27, 1952, ch. 477, title IV, §403(a)(20), (22), (23), (29), 66 Stat. 279, eff. Dec. 24, 1952

Section 221, act May 26, 1924, ch. 190, §23, 43 Stat. 165, related to burden of proof upon entry of alien or in deportation proceedings.

Section 222, act May 26, 1924, ch. 190, §24, 43 Stat. 166, related to rules and regulations.

Section 223, act May 26, 1924, ch. 190, §25, 43 Stat. 166, related to quota law as additional to other immigration laws.

Section 224, acts May 26, 1924, ch. 190, §28(a)–(e), (g)–(n), 43 Stat. 168; June 2, 1924, ch. 233, 43 Stat. 253; Oct. 29, 1945, ch. 437, 59 Stat. 551, related to definitions.

Section 225, act May 26, 1924, ch. 190, §29, 43 Stat. 169, related to appropriations.

Section 226, act May 26, 1924, ch. 190, §32, 43 Stat. 169, related to partial invalidity.

Section 226a, act Apr. 2, 1928, ch. 308, 45 Stat. 401, related to American Indians born in Canada.

Section 227, act Dec. 27, 1922, ch. 15, 42 Stat. 1065, related to admission of certain aliens in excess of quotas.
Exhibit 10.15



 







Exhibit 10.15




TERMINATION AGREEMENT



(Technical Services Agreement)




THIS AGREEMENT made effective as of the 1st day of January, 2006



AMONG:




	 	 	 
	 

	 	JMG EXPLORATION, INC., a corporation

having an office in Calgary, Alberta (“JMG”)






OF THE FIRST PART




- and -




	 	 	 
	 

	 	JED OIL INC., a corporation having an

office in Calgary, Alberta (“JED”)






OF THE SECOND PART




WHEREAS:





	A.	 	The parties are the parties to the Technical Services Agreement dated effective January 1,
2004 between JMG and JED; and
	 
	B.	 	the parties desire to enter into this Termination Agreement to provide for the termination of
such agreement;




NOW THEREFORE for consideration of $10.00 paid by each party to each other party and other good and
valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties
agree as follows:





	1.	 	Termination of Agreement




JMG and JED hereby agree that the Technical Services Agreement dated effective January 1, 2004 be
terminated effective January 1, 2006.





	2.	 	Enurement




This Agreement shall enure to the benefit of and be binding upon the parties hereto, their
respective successors at law and permitted assigns.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties have executed and delivered this Agreement effective as of the date
first written above.




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	JMG EXPLORATION, INC.
	 	 	 	 	 	          JED OIL INC.
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Per:

	 	/s/
Herman S. Hartley	 	 	 	Per:	 	/s/
Thomas J. Jacobsen
	 

	 	Herman S. Hartley, President/CEO
	 	 	 	 	 	Thomas J. Jacobsen, CEO
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Per:

	 	/s/
Joanne R. Finnerty	 	 	 	Per:	 	/s/
Bruce A. Stewart
	 

	 	Joanne R. Finnerty, CFO
	 	 	 	 	 	Bruce A. Stewart, Secretary/CFO