alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §4317. Investigations; subpena powers, etc.; enforcement

The Secretary may make such investigations as are deemed necessary to carry out the Secretary's responsibilities under this chapter or to determine whether a producer, importer, wholesaler, retailer, or other seller of flowers and plants, or any other person has engaged or is about to engage in any acts or practices which constitute or will constitute a violation of any provisions of this chapter, or of any order, or rule or regulation issued under this chapter. For the purpose of such investigation, the Secretary is empowered to administer oaths and affirmations, subpena witnesses, compel their attendance, take evidence, and require the production of any books, papers, and documents which are relevant to the inquiry. Such attendance of witnesses and the production of any such records may be required from any place in the United States. In case of contumacy by, or refusal to obey a subpena to, any person, including a producer of flowers and plants, the Secretary may invoke the aid of any court of the United States within the jurisdiction of which such investigation or proceeding is carried on, or where such person resides or carries on business, in requiring the attendance and testimony of witnesses and the production of books, papers, and documents; and such court may issue an order requiring such person to appear before the Secretary, there to produce records, if so ordered, or to give testimony touching the matter under investigation. Any failure to obey such order of the court may be punished by such court as a contempt thereof. All processes in any such cases may be served in the judicial district wherein such person is an inhabitant or wherever such person may be found.

(Pub. L. 97–98, title XVII, §1718, Dec. 22, 1981, 95 Stat. 1357.)
### §1831a. Contract restrictions

On and after June 13, 1958 no conservation reserve contract shall be entered into which provides for (1) payments for conservation practices in excess of the average rate for comparable practices under the environmental quality incentives program established under subchapter A of chapter 4 of subtitle D of title XII of the Food Security Act of 1985 [16 U.S.C. 3839aa et seq.], or (2) annual rental payments in excess of 20 per cent of the value of the land placed under contract, such value to be determined without regard to physical improvements thereon or geographic location thereof. In determining the value of the land for this purpose, the county committee shall take into consideration the estimate of the landowner or operator as to the value of such land as well as his certificate as to the production history and productivity of such land.

(Pub. L. 85–459, title I, §101, June 13, 1958, 72 Stat. 195; Pub. L. 104–127, title III, §336(a)(2)(A), Apr. 4, 1996, 110 Stat. 1005; Pub. L. 115–334, title II, §2301(d)(2)(C), Dec. 20, 2018, 132 Stat. 4554.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Food Security Act of 1985, referred to in text, is Pub. L. 99–198, Dec. 23, 1985, 99 Stat. 1354. Subchapter A of chapter 4 of subtitle D of title XII of the Act is classified generally to subpart A (§3839aa et seq.) of part IV of subchapter IV of chapter 58 of Title 16, Conservation. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title of 1985 Amendment note set out under section 1281 of this title and Tables.

#### Codification

Section was not enacted as part of the Soil Bank Act which comprised this chapter.

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–334 inserted "subchapter A of" before "chapter 4".

1996—Pub. L. 104–127 substituted "environmental quality incentives program established under chapter 4 of subtitle D of title XII of the Food Security Act of 1985" for "Agricultural Conservation Program".
#### § 776.78 Informal complaints.

Informal, anonymous, or “hot line” type complaints alleging professional misconduct must be referred to the appropriate authority (such as the JAG Inspector General or the concerned supervisory attorney) for inquiry. Such complaints are not, by themselves, cognizable under this subpart but may, if reasonably confirmed, be the basis of a formal complaint described in § 776.79 of this part.
### §1519. Repealed. Pub. L. 104–127, title I, §196(j), Apr. 4, 1996, 110 Stat. 950

Section, act Feb. 16, 1938, ch. 30, title V, §519, formerly §518, 52 Stat. 77; renumbered §519, June 21, 1941, ch. 214, §9, 55 Stat. 256; amended Oct. 13, 1994, Pub. L. 103–354, title I, §§111, 112, 108 Stat. 3199, 3202, related to noninsured crop disaster assistance program. See section 7333 of this title.
### §6404. Notice and comment

Not later than 60 days after the Secretary receives a request for the issuance of an order under this chapter, and a specific proposal for an order from individual fluid milk processors that marketed during a representative period, as determined by the Secretary, not less than 30 percent of the volume of fluid milk products marketed by all processors, the Secretary shall publish the proposed order and give due notice and opportunity for public comment on the proposed order.

(Pub. L. 101–624, title XIX, §1999E, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 3916.)
C. A. No. 73-252.

#### State *v.*Joseph A. Amoruso *et al.*

*Richard J. Israel,*Attorney General, *Donald P. Ryan,*Asst. Attorney General, for plaintiff. *Moore, Virgadamo, Boyle & Lynch, Ltd., Joseph R. Palumbo, Jr.,*for defendant Edward E. Woodlyn.

Motion of defendant Edward E. Woodlyn for a speedy determination on the merits is denied.
### §971. C–TPAT program management

#### (a) In general

The Secretary, acting through the Commissioner, shall establish sufficient internal quality controls and record management to support the management systems of C–TPAT. In managing the program, the Secretary shall ensure that the program includes:

#### (1) Strategic plan

A 5-year plan to identify outcome-based goals and performance measures of the program.

#### (2) Annual plan

An annual plan for each fiscal year designed to match available resources to the projected workload.

#### (3) Standardized work program

A standardized work program to be used by agency personnel to carry out the certifications, validations, and revalidations of participants. The Secretary shall keep records and monitor staff hours associated with the completion of each such review.

#### (b) Documentation of reviews

The Secretary, acting through the Commissioner, shall maintain a record management system to document determinations on the reviews of each C–TPAT participant, including certifications, validations, and revalidations.

#### (c) Confidential information safeguards

In consultation with the Commercial Operations Advisory Committee, the Secretary, acting through the Commissioner, shall develop and implement procedures to ensure the protection of confidential data collected, stored, or shared with government agencies or as part of the application, certification, validation, and revalidation processes.

#### (d) Resource management staffing plan

The Secretary, acting through the Commissioner, shall—

(1) develop a staffing plan to recruit and train staff (including a formalized training program) to meet the objectives identified in the strategic plan of the C–TPAT program; and

(2) provide cross-training in postincident trade resumption for personnel who administer the C–TPAT program.

#### (e) Report to Congress

In connection with the President's annual budget submission for the Department, the Secretary shall report to the appropriate congressional committees on the progress made by the Commissioner to certify, validate, and revalidate C–TPAT participants. Such report shall be due on the same date that the President's budget is submitted to the Congress.

(Pub. L. 109–347, title II, §221, Oct. 13, 2006, 120 Stat. 1914.)
#### Lesron Junior, Inc., et al., v. Peter I. Feinberg et al.

Motion by respondents Zeckendorf Hotels Corporation, Webb & Knapp, Inc., Webb & Knapp Construction Corp., Richard T. Gordon and 78013 Corporation to dismiss appeal granted, with $10 costs, unless the appellants procure the record on appeal and appellants’ points to be served and filed on or before January 3, 1961, with notice of argument for the February 1961 Term of this court, said appeal to be argued or submitted when reached. Motion by respondent Drake Associates to dismiss appeal granted, with $10 costs, unless the appellants procure the record on appeal and appellants’ points to be served and filed on or before January 3, 1961, with notice of argument for the February 1961 Term of this court, said appeal to be argued or submitted when reached. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, Valente and McNally, JJ.
#### Helen Brennan et al. *v.*John J. Salce et al.

*Edward J. McMahon,*for the appellees (defendants).

*Charles Tomasino,*for the appellants (named plaintiff and Helen Dahlmeyer).

Argued December 3

decided December 3, 1974

The defendants’ motion to dismiss the appeal of the plaintiff Helen Dahlmeyer from the Superior Court in New Haven County is granted.
Filed by Automated Filing Services Inc. (604) 609-0244 - Golden Queen Mining Co. Ltd. - Exhibit 10.8






Guarantee Agreement

This agreement is made effective this 10th day of
August, 2001, between Madge W. Wolff, Stephen G. Wegmann, Michael L. Wegmann,
John G. Hodgson, Virginia l Sigl, individually and as successor in interest to
the Estat of Grace W. Meehl, Patrick L. Woff, George P. Wolff, John G. Meehl,
successor in interst to the Trust of Grace W. Meehl and Mary Ann Godfrey, as
successor in interest to the Trust of Grace W. Meehl (collectively referred to
herein as “Optionor” and also now collectively referred to herein as the
“Wegmann Shareholders”) and Golden Queen Mining Company, Ltd., a Canadian
corporation (“Company”), with reference to the following facts:

	 	A. 	
      On or about April 1, 1995, the Wegmann Shareholders and
      Golden Queen entered into that certain Stock Option Purchase Agreement
      (the “Agreement”), pursuant to which the Wegmann Shareholders granted to
      Golden Queen the exclusive right to purchase all of the issued and
      outstanding stock of Karman Wegmann Corporation. Terms not otherwise
      defined herein shall have the meaning ascribed in the Agreement.

	 	 	 
	 	B. 	
      On or about June 6, 1999, Golden Queen and Wegmann
      Shareholders entered into that certain First Amnedment to Stock Option
      Purchase Agreement (“First Amendment”).

	 	 	 
	 	C. 	
      Wegmann Shareholders are in the process of entering into
      a Second Amenedment to Stock Option Purchase Agreement (“Second
      Amendment”) with Company’s wholly owned California subsidiary, Golden
      Queen Mining Company, Inc. (“Golden Queen”).

	 	 	 
	 	D. 	
      Wegmann Shareholders have asked Compny to guaratee the
      performance of the Second Amendment and the Agreement, as so
    ameneded.

	 	 	 
	 	E. 	
      Company is willing to make such a guarantee on the terms
      and subject to the conditions hereinafter set
forth.



Therefore, the parties hereto agree as follows:

In consideration of Wegmann Shareholders entering into the
Second Amendment with Golden Queen, Company guarantees all obligations which
Golden Queen is obligated to perform under the Second amendment and the
Agreement, as amended, and should Golden Queen default in any performance of the
Second Amendment and the Agreement, as amended, Company will be liable for the
default of Golden Queen to the same extent as if it were a signatory to the
Second Amendment and the Agreement, as amended.

Company has the right and power to enter into this Guarantee
Agreement and to carry out the transactions contemplated hereby.

In witness whereof, the Guarantee Agreement has been signed
this 17th day of August, 2001.

[SIGNATURES FOLLOW]

	 	“GOLDEN QUEEN” 
	 	GOLDEN QUEEN MINING CO., INC. 
	 	a California corporation 
	 	By:
      /s/ H. Lutz Klingmann
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
                                                                                    Exhibit 12(b)

PENNSYLVANIA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES, CONSOLIDATED

COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

(Millions of Dollars)
<CAPTION>
                                                  1996     1995     1994     1993     1992
<S>                                             <C>      <C>      <C>      <C>      <C>
Fixed charges, as defined:
  Interest on long-term debt ...................   $207     $213     $214     $226     $240
  Interest on short-term debt
     and other interest ........................     11       18       18       13       12
  Amortization of debt discount, expense
    and premium - net...........................      2        2        2        2        1
  Interest on capital lease
    obligations
      Charged to expense .......................     13       15       12        9       10
      Capitalized ..............................      2        2        1        1        2
  Estimated interest component of
    operating rentals ..........................      8        8        6        5        5
  Proportionate share of fixed charges
    of 50-percent-or-less-owned
    persons ....................................      1        1        1        1        2

          Total fixed charges ..................   $244     $259     $254     $257     $272

Earnings, as defined:
  Net income ...................................   $357     $352     $243     $348     $346
  Less undistributed income of less
    than 50-percent-owned persons .............                                                 -
                                                    357      352      243      348      346

Add (Deduct):
  Federal income taxes .........................    189      195      199      163      145
  State income taxes ...........................     64       62       77       64       65
  Deferred income taxes ........................     10       15      (45)      22       33
  Investment tax credit - net ..................    (10)     (11)     (12)     (14)     (14)
  Income taxes on other income and
    deductions - net ...........................     (2)      26      (38)      (1)       0
  Amortization of capitalized
    interest on capital leases .................      4        6        9       12       13
  Total fixed charges as above
    (excluding capitalized interest
    on capital lease obligations) ..............    243      257      253      256      271

          Total earnings .......................   $855     $902     $686     $850     $859

Ratio of earnings to fixed
  charges ......................................   3.50     3.48     2.70     3.31     3.15



</TABLE>
Order filed September 3, 2020. 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-19-01002-CV

____________

VIRGINIA A. KINNEY, Appellant

V.

CB&I, LLC, Appellee

On Appeal from the 127th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2017-65953

ORDER

Appellee petitioned for voluntary bankruptcy in the United States 

Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas, under cause number 20-

30336. Because a stay is automatically effected by Section 362(a) of the 

Bankruptcy Code, when this court received notice of appellant’s bankruptcy filing, 

on January 29, 2020, we stayed all proceedings in the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P.

8.2. 

On August 28, 2020, appellant filed a motion to reinstate the appeal pursuant 

to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 8.3(a). The motion is granted. Accordingly, 

the case is ordered REINSTATED and placed on the court’s active docket. 
Appellant’s brief is due to be filed with the clerk of this court on or before 

October 5, 2020.

PER CURIAM

Panel Consists of Justices Spain, Hassan, and Poissant.
Exhibit 4.1
  Agreement EMS Canadian Borrower Borrowers
 RECITALS
 Credit Agreement
 Section 9.01(b) Section 8.06 Existing Event of Default
   Waiver Section
8.06
 Condition Precedent
 Miscellaneous




---



##### 



THIS AGREEMENT AND THE RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS OF THE PARTIES HEREUNDER SHALL BE
GOVERNED BY AND CONSTRUED AND INTERPRETED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEW
YORK.




---



##### 



BORROWERS:
    EMS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
a Georgia corporation, as a Borrower and, with
respect to the Canadian Obligations, as a GuarantorBy:Name:Title:EMS TECHNOLOGIES CANADA, LTD.,
a Canadian federal corporation, as a BorrowerBy:Name:Title: DOMESTIC GUARANTORS:
    LXE INC.,
a Georgia corporationBy:Name:Title:FORMATION, INC.,
a New Jersey corporationBy:Name:Title:ADVANCED INTEGRATED RECORDERS, INC.,
a Delaware corporationBy:Name:Title:EMS DEFENSE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
a Georgia corporationBy:Name:Title:




---



##### 



CANADIAN GUARANTORS:
    990834 ONTARIO INC.,
an Ontario corporationBy:Name:Title:EMS HOLDINGS S.À.R.L.,
a Luxembourg private limited liability companyBy:Name:Title:EMS TECHNOLOGIES  LXE S.E.N.C.,
a Luxembourg general corporate partnershipBy:Name:Title:LXE (UK) LTD.,
a company incorporated in England and WalesBy:Name:Title:EMS ACQUISITION COMPANY LIMITED,
a company incorporated in England and WalesBy:Name:Title:SATAMATICS GLOBAL LIMITED,
a company incorporated in England and WalesBy:Name:Title:LXE GMBH,
a limited liability company organized under the laws
of GermanyBy:Name:Title:




---



##### 



LXE BELGIUM NV,
a company incorporated and existing under the laws
of BelgiumBy:Name:Title:LXE NETHERLANDS BV,
a private company with limited liability
organized under the laws of the NetherlandsBy:Name:Title:LXE NORDICS AB,
a Swedish corporationBy:Name:Title:AKERSTRÖMS TRUX AB,
a Swedish corporationBy:Name:Title:




---



##### 



DOMESTICADMINISTRATIVE AGENT:
    BANK OF AMERICA,
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,
as Domestic Administrative AgentBy:Name:Title:CANADIANADMINISTRATIVE AGENT:
    BANK OF AMERICA,
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,
acting through its Canada branch,
as Canadian Administrative AgentBy:Name:Title:DOMESTIC LENDERS:
    BANK OF AMERICA,
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,
as a Domestic Lender and Domestic L/C IssuerBy:Name:Title:SUNTRUST BANK,
as a Domestic Lender,By:Name:Title: WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.,
(successor-by-merger to Wachovia Bank, National
Association),
as a Domestic Lender,By:Name:Title:




---



##### 



CANADIAN LENDERS:
    BANK OF AMERICA,
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,
acting through its Canada branch,
as a Canadian Lender and Canadian L/C IssuerBy:Name:Title:SUNTRUST BANK,
as a Canadian Lender,By:Name:Title: WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.,
(successor-by-merger to Wachovia Bank, National
Association),
as a Canadian Lender,By:Name:Title:
|Exhibit 99(i)                                                  
|---------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                               
|PPL Corporation - Corporate Organization(Selected Subsidiaries)
|                                                               
|PPL Corporation                                                
|                                                               
|                                                               
|                                                               
|                                                               
|                                                               
|                                                               
|                                                               
|                                                               
|                                                               
|                                                               
|                                                               
|                                                               
|                                                               
|                                                               
|                                                               
|                                                               
|                                                               
|                                                               
|                                                               
|                                                               
|                                                               
|                                                               
|                                                               
|                                                               
|                                                               
|                                                               
|                                                               
|                                                               
|                                                               
|                                                               
|                                                               
|                                                               
|                                                               
|                                                               
|                                                               
|                                                               
|                                                               
|                                                               
|                                                               
|                                                               
|
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT WILLIAM CRESCENZO, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-296 ) IRENE SIMPSON, as Personal ) Representative of Estate of ) Herminia Quinones, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed January 4, 2019. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; E. Lamar Battles, Judge. Ann M. Allison of Allison Law Group, Temple Terrace, for Appellant. Rory B. Weiner of Rory B. Weiner, P. A., Brandon, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. CASANUEVA, KELLY, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.
#### 1228.311-1 Contract clause.

The contracting officer shall insert the clause at FAR 52.228-7, Insurance Liability to Third Persons, as prescribed in FAR 28.311-1 unless it is waived by an official one level above the contracting officer.