alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1st AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT WITH ALISON GREGG CORCORAN



 Exhibit 10.20b 
  
 FIRST AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
  
 This First Amendment to Employment Agreement (“Amendment”), is dated as of this 1st day of October, 2005, by and between Alison Gregg Corcoran, whose address is 70 Morton Road, Milton, Massachusetts
(“Executive”) and BJ’s Wholesale Club, Inc., a Delaware corporation, whose principal office is One Mercer Road, Natick, Massachusetts (the “Company”). 
  
 W I T N E S S E T H: 
  
 WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive are parties to that certain Employment Agreement dated August 31, 2004 (“Employment
Agreement”); 
  
 WHEREAS, the Company and the
Executive desire to amend certain provisions of the Employment Agreement hereby; 
  
 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and promises contained in this Amendment and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged by the
parties, the Company and the Executive, intending to be legally bound, do hereby agree to amend the Employment Agreement as follows: 
  

	 	1.	 	Section 3.5(b) (1) of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended by deleting the reference to “twelve (12) months (the “Severance Period”)” and
replacing it with “eighteen (18) months (the “Severance Period”).” 

  

	 	2.	 	Sections 4.1 and 4.2 of the Employment Agreement are hereby amended by deleting the references to “twelve (12) month(s)” and replacing them with “eighteen
(18) month(s)”. 

  

	 	3.	 	This First Amendment shall be effective as of September 21, 2005. 

  

	 	4.	 	The Employment Agreement, as modified by this Amendment, sets forth the understanding of the parties hereto with respect to the subject matter hereof and all other terms and
conditions of the Employment Agreement not modified or amended hereby shall remain and are in full force and effect. 

  
 * * * * * * * * 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of the day and year first above
written. 
  

									
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 BJ’S WHOLESALE CLUB, INC.

					
	 Attest    :
	 	 /s/    Kellye L. Walker
	 	  	 	 By:
	 	 /s/    Michael Wedge

	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	Michael T. Wedge,
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	President and Chief Executive Officer
				
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 Executive:

				
	 Witness:
	 	 /s/    Frank Forward
	 	  	 	 /s/    Alison Gregg Corcoran

	 	 	 	 	 	 	Alison Gregg Corcoran

  

 2
Appeal No. 75-39.

#### Robert L. Armstrong *v.*Richard W. Polaski.

Motion of the appellee that the case be remanded to *954the Superior. Court- is denied, subject to the right, of the-appellee to-order the transcript in question at his own expense., Said cost of transcript is to be treated as costs in the case in the event that the appellee is successful in his appeal.

*John D. Lynch,*for appellant. *William Oerstenblatt,*for appellee.
#### TOWNES v. MILLS

No. 505P97

Case below: 127 N.C.App. 555

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 5 February 1998.
EXHIBIT 10(n)(i)

UST

                                   AMENDMENT

     This Agreement amends the First Amended and Restated  Employment  Agreement
between  Neal F.  Finnegan  and UST Corp.  dated as of the 21st day of November,
1995 (the "Employment Agreement").  All capitalized terms used in this Agreement
shall have the  meaning  ascribed  to them in the  Employment  Agreement  unless
otherwise provided herein.

    1.   The original term of the Employment  Agreement is hereby  extended such
         that it shall expire on January 4, 2000.

    2.   The Employee's  base salary is hereby  increased  effective  January 1,
         1997, to a rate of $480,000 per annum.

    3.   In addition to the stock options previously granted the Employee as set
         forth in  Section  II of the  Employment  Agreement,  the  Employee  is
         granted on January 2, 1997, a total of 50,000 stock  options  under the
         Plan, priced at fair market value at the close of trading on January 2,
         1997, as reported by the Wall Street  Journal (the  "Exercise  Price").
         The  options  shall  vest as  follows:  (i) one third of the  shares on
         January  2, 1997;  (ii) one third on the  earlier of January 2, 1998 or
         the first  trading day on which the closing  price of UST Common  Stock
         shall have  equaled or exceeded  for ten  consecutive  trading days the
         Exercise Price plus Three Dollars ($3.00);  and (iii) the last third on
         the  earlier of January 2, 1999 or the first  trading  day on which the
         closing  price of UST Common  Stock shall have  equaled or exceeded for
         ten  consecutive  trading  days the  Exercise  Price  plus Six  Dollars
         ($6.00).

    4.   In  addition  to shares of  Restricted  Stock  previously  granted  the
         Employee as set forth in Section II of the  Employment  Agreement,  the
         Employee  is  granted  on  January  2,  1997 a total  10,800  shares of
         Restricted Stock under the plan which shall vest on January 2, 1999, in
         accordance with the Plan.

    5.   The options and  Restricted  Stock  granted to the Employee  under this
         Agreement   shall  vest  in  accordance  with  Section  VIIIC.  of  the
         Employment Agreement in the event of a Change of Control.

    6.   Except as expressly modified herein, the Employment Agreement,  and all
         of its terms and provisions, shall remain in full force and effect.


UST Corp.
40 Court Street. Boston. Massachusetts 02108
(617) 726-7000 Telex 951494 UST BSN



     Intending to be legally bound, the parties have signed this Agreement as of
the 17th day of December, 1996.

UST CORP:
By:    /s/ William Schwartz
       ------------------------
       William Schwartz
Title: Chairman of the Board


       /s/ Neal F. Finnegan
       ------------------------
       Neal F. Finnegan
#### 1252.228-74 Notification of Payment Bond Protection.

As prescribed in guidance at 1228.106-470, insert the following clause:

# Notification of Payment Bond Protection (NOV 2022)

(a) The prime contract is subject to the Bonds statute (historically referred to as the Miller Act) (40 U.S.C. chapter 31, subchapter III), under which the prime contractor has obtained a payment bond. This payment bond may provide certain unpaid employees, suppliers, and subcontractors a right to sue the bonding surety under the Bonds statute for amounts owned for work performed and materials delivery under the prime contract.

(b) Persons believing that they have legal remedies under the Bonds statute should consult their legal advisor regarding the proper steps to take to obtain these remedies. This notice clause does not provide any party any rights against the Federal Government, or create any relationship, contractual or otherwise, between the Federal Government and any private party.

(c) The surety which has provided the payment bond under the prime contract is: [*Contracting Officer fill-in prime contractor's surety information*]

(Name)

(Street Address)

(City, State, Zip Code)

(Contact & Tel. No.)

(d) Subcontract flowdown requirements. This clause shall be flowed down to all subcontractors. Prime contractors shall insert this notice clause in all first-tier subcontracts and shall require the clause to be subsequently flowed down by all first-tier subcontractors to all their subcontractors, at any tier. This notice contains information pertaining to the surety that provided the payment bond under the prime contract and is required to be inserted in its entirety to include the information set forth in paragraph (c).

(End of clause)
# MD5 checksums generated by MD5summer (http://www.md5summer.org)
# Generated 8/20/2008 11:08:27 AM

b99beacb8349d957c9f6e9448341b223 *d08804.pdf
| CERTIFICATION                       |
|-------------------------------------|
|                                |
| I, DAVID G. DECAMPLI, certify that: |
|                                |   |
| 1.                                  | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form 10-K of PPL Electric Utilities Corporation (the "registrant") for the year ended December 31, 2009; and |
|                                |   |
| 2.                                  | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |
|                                |   |   |
|                                |   |   |
|                                |   |
|                                |   |
|                                |   |
| Date:  April 27, 2010     | /s/  David G. DeCampli |   |
|                                | David G. DeCampliPresidentPPL Electric Utilities Corporation |
### §7a. Repealed. Pub. L. 111–203, title VII, §734(a), July 21, 2010, 124 Stat. 1718

Section, act Sept. 21, 1922, ch. 369, §5a, as added Pub. L. 106–554, §1(a)(5) [title I, §111], Dec. 21, 2000, 114 Stat. 2763, 2763A–387; amended Pub. L. 110–234, title XIII, §13203(h), May 22, 2008, 122 Stat. 1440; Pub. L. 110–246, §4(a), title XIII, §13203(h), June 18, 2008, 122 Stat. 1664, 2202; Pub. L. 111–203, title VII, §721(e)(5), July 21, 2010, 124 Stat. 1671, related to derivatives transaction execution facilities.

A prior section 7a, act Sept. 21, 1922, ch. 369, §5a, as added June 15, 1936, ch. 545, §7, 49 Stat. 1497; amended Pub. L. 90–258, §12, Feb. 19, 1968, 82 Stat. 29; Pub. L. 93–463, title I, §103(a), (e), (f), title II, §§208–210, title IV, §§406, 407, Oct. 23, 1974, 88 Stat. 1392, 1400, 1401, 1413; Pub. L. 95–405, §§11, 12, Sept. 30, 1978, 92 Stat. 870, 871; Pub. L. 97–444, title II, §§216, 217(a), Jan. 11, 1983, 96 Stat. 2306, 2307; Pub. L. 99–641, title I, §110(2), Nov. 10, 1986, 100 Stat. 3561; Pub. L. 102–546, title I, §103, title II, §§201(a), 206(a)(1), 213(a), 217, 222(a), Oct. 28, 1992, 106 Stat. 3594, 3595, 3601, 3609, 3611, 3615, related to duties of contract markets prior to repeal by Pub. L. 106–554, §1(a)(5) [title I, §110(2)], Dec. 21, 2000, 114 Stat. 2763, 2763A–384.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective on the later of 360 days after July 21, 2010, or, to the extent a provision of subtitle A (§§711–754) of title VII of Pub. L. 111–203 requires a rulemaking, not less than 60 days after publication of the final rule or regulation implementing such provision of subtitle A, see section 754 of Pub. L. 111–203, set out as an Effective Date of 2010 Amendment note under section 1a of this title.
Appeal No. 74-241.

#### State *v.*Steven P. Slezak.

*Julius C. Michaelson,*Attorney General, *Judith Romney Wegner,*Special Asst. Attorney General, for plaintiff. *Aram K. Berberian,*for defendant.

Motion of State that the defendant file a more complete transcript is denied. Since the defendant has satisfied the court that he is indigent, the State is directed to obtain a more complete transcript at its own expense if said transcript is desired by the State. See *Griffin*v. *Illinois,*351 U. S. 12, 76 S.Ct. 585, 100 L.Ed. 891 (1956), and *Britt*v. *North Carolina,*404 U. S. 226, 92 S.Ct. 431, 30 L.Ed.2d 400 (1971).
#### 1215.606 Agency procedures.

The OA contracting office is the designated point of contact for receipt and handling of unsolicited proposals (*see* 1215.604). The assigned DOT contracting office will review and evaluate the proposal within 30 calendar days, if practicable, in accordance with FAR 15.606-1, Receipt and initial review, to inform the offeror of the reasons for rejection and the proposed disposition of the unsolicited proposal.
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 114 (Wednesday, June 13, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 35366]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-14399]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Proposed Subsequent Arrangement

AGENCY: Office of Nonproliferation and International Security, 
Department of Energy.

ACTION: Proposed subsequent arrangement.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice is being issued under the authority of section 
131a.of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended. The Department is 
providing notice of a proposed subsequent arrangement under the 
Agreement for Cooperation Between the Government of the United States 
of America and the Government of Japan Concerning Peaceful Uses of 
Nuclear Energy and the Agreement for Cooperation Between the United 
States of America and the Republic of Kazakhstan Concerning Peaceful 
Uses of Nuclear Energy.

DATES: This subsequent arrangement will take effect no sooner than June 
28, 2012.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Sean Oehlbert, Office of 
Nonproliferation and International Security, National Nuclear Security 
Administration, Department of Energy. Telephone: 202-586-3806 or email: 
Sean.Oehlbert@nnsa.doe.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This subsequent arrangement concerns the 
retransfer of 6,672,212 g of U.S.-origin enriched uranium fuel 
fabrications scrap, containing 233,977 g of the isotope U-235 (less 
than five percent enrichment), from Nuclear Fuel Industries, Ltd. in 
Minato-Ku, Tokyo, Japan, to Ulba Metallurgical Plant in Ust-Kamengorsk, 
Kazakhstan. The material, which is currently located at Nuclear Fuels 
Industries, Ltd. in Japan, will be transferred to Ulba Metallurgical 
Plant for the purpose of recovering uranium from fuel fabrication scrap 
for return to Japan where it will be fabricated into fuel pellets to be 
used by Kansai Electric Power Co., in Osaka, Japan. The material was 
originally obtained by Nuclear Fuel Industries, Ltd. from nuclear fuel 
manufacturers in the United States pursuant to several Nuclear 
Regulatory Commission licenses.
    In accordance with section 131a.of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, 
as amended, it has been determined that this subsequent arrangement 
concerning the retransfer of nuclear material of United States origin 
will not be inimical to the common defense and security.

    Dated: May 21, 2012.

    For the Department of Energy.
Anne M. Harrington,
Deputy Administrator, Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation.
[FR Doc. 2012-14399 Filed 6-12-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
```
exv10w1



 






Exhibit 10.1




March 30, 2006




By Personal Delivery

Mr. Richard E. Goodrich

3 Oakley Downs

The Woodlands, TX 77382




Dear Rich:



Earlier this week, we agreed to amend your Severance Agreement (the “Agreement”) and our February
13, 2006 letter agreement amending that Agreement so that you will remain employed by Chicago
Bridge & Iron Company (Delaware) (“Company” or “CB&I”) through April 30, 2006 (although we could
mutually agree in writing to shorten or extend that period



While you continue to be an employee of CB&I, you will continue to receive compensation at your
current base salary and will continue to receive all Company benefits (including perquisites) you
were receiving as of the date you signed the Agreement.



To the extent other provisions of your Agreement were tied to or reflected a February 13, 2006
retirement date, those provisions are changed so that April 30, 2006 (or another date mutually
agreed to in writing by you and CB&I) is instead the operative date. Further, your Agreement for
Consulting Services will not take effect until a day after you are no longer employed by CB&I, and
it will last for two (2) years from that date.



Other than the provisions we have specifically amended in this letter, all other provisions of the
Agreement and your Agreement for Consulting Services remain in effect.



If you agree to amend your Agreement consistent with this letter, please sign below and return this
document to me. If not, let’s discuss this matter.




Sincerely,




/s/David P. Bordages

David P. Bordages

VP- Human Resources & Administration




Agreed:




/s/ Richard E. Goodrich

Richard E. Goodrich




____________________________

March 30, 2006
#### 11.302 Contract clause.

Insert the clause at 52.211-5, Material Requirements, in solicitations and contracts for supplies that are not commercial products.

[65 FR 36018, June 6, 2000, as amended at 86 FR 61021, Nov. 4, 2021. Redesignated at 89 FR 30237, Ape. 22, 2024]
11/01/2023

Organizational Structure of the Office of the General Counsel

Graphic Version
11/01/2023

Text Version

Office of the General Counsel

Ethics, Regulatory, and Legislative Service

• Legislative Counsel Division

• Regulatory Services Division

• Ethics Division

Program Service

• Educational Equity and Research Division

• Education Programs Division

Departmental Law and Postsecondary Service

• Business and Administrative Law Division

• Postsecondary Education Division
The Department of Education’s mission is to promote student achievement and preparation for global competitiveness by fostering

national educational excellence and ensuring equal access..

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL

MEMORANDUM

TO: Staff Attorneys

Ethics Division

FROM: The Designated Agency Ethics Official

SUBJECT: Delegation of Authority for Ethics Program

I. Delegation

Under the authority vested in me by the Secretary through delegation EA/EGB3/116, 

certified on December 18, 2008, I designate you as Deputy Ethics Officials and delegate 

to you the authority to you perform the functions of the Designated Agency Ethics 

Official, in accordance with 5 C.F.R. § 2638.203 and 2638.204 (a).

II. Reservations

This delegation does not include the authority to certify the financial disclosure reports of 

nominees to, or current or former incumbents in, positions subject to Presidential 

Appointment and Senate Confirmation.

III. Redelegation

This authority may not be redelegated.

IV. Certification and Effective Date

This delegation is effective upon certification by the Department's Principal Delegation 

Control Officer and supersedes EGB3/EGB3/105.

__________/s/_____________

Susan Winchell

OGC Clearance and Date: /s/ David Berthiaume, 1/9/2009

Certified Date: 1/9/2009

Departmental Delegations Control Officer: /s/ Naty G. Beetle

Control Number: EGB3/EGB3/118
### §7810. Authority for Secretary to suspend or terminate order

#### (a) Grounds for suspension or termination

If the Secretary finds that an order, or any provision of the order, obstructs or does not tend to effectuate the policy of this chapter specified in section 7801(b) of this title, the Secretary shall terminate or suspend the operation of the order or provision under such terms as the Secretary determines are appropriate.

#### (b) Effect of lack of approval of order

If, as a result of a referendum, the Secretary determines that the order is not approved, the Secretary shall, within 180 days after making the determination, suspend, or terminate, as appropriate, collection of assessments under the order, and suspend or terminate, as appropriate, activities under the order in an orderly manner as soon as possible.

(Pub. L. 106–387, §1(a) [title XII, §1211], Oct. 28, 2000, 114 Stat. 1549, 1549A–96.)
#### Samuel Yolen, Respondent, v. Alvin Needleman, Appellant.

In an action to recover upon a series of promissory notes, defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered February 21, 1963, which denied his motion: (a) to vacate his default on plaintiff’s prior motion for summary judgment; and (b) to vacate the order, entered September 7, 1960 granting such motion and the judgment thereon, entered September 22, 1960. Order appealed from reversed, without costs; defendant’s motion is granted to the extent of vacating his default and the order entered September 7, 1960 and permitting defendant to oppose the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment on the merits, upon the condition that the judgment shall remain a lien as security for any recovery which may finally be had against the defendant in the action; and action remitted to the court below for further proceedings not inconsistent herewith. In our opinion the defendant has given a satisfactory reason for his default and should be allowed to oppose the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment on the merits. Beldoek, P. J., Kleinfeld, Brennan, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
<Page>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 15





TXU Gas Company:

We have made a review, in accordance with standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants, of the unaudited condensed
consolidated interim financial information of TXU Gas Company and subsidiaries
(TXU Gas) for the period ended September 30, 2001, as indicated in our report
dated November 12, 2001 because we did not perform an audit, we expressed no
opinion on that information.

We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included in TXU Gas'
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2001, is
incorporated by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-85769,
333-85769-01, 333-85769-02 and 333-85769-03 on Form S-3.

We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under
the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration
Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or
certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.


/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Dallas, Texas
November 12, 2001
### §427g. Repealed. Aug. 11, 1955, ch. 790, §2, 69 Stat. 674

Section, act June 29, 1935, ch. 338, title I, §8, 49 Stat. 438, reserved the right to Congress to amend, suspend, or repeal act June 29, 1935. See section 361i of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Existing Rights and Liabilities

Any rights or liabilities existing under this section unaffected by repeal, see section 2 of act Aug. 11, 1955, set out as a note under former section 361 of this title.
United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois

Case Number: Assigned/Issued By:

Judge Name: Designated Magistrate Judge:

FEE INFORMATION

Amount Due: $350.00 $39.00 $5.00

IFP No Fee Other _____________

 $455.00

 

Number of Service Copies ___________ Date: ______________________

(For Use by Fiscal Department Only)

Amount Paid: ___________________ Receipt #: __________________

Date Payment Rec’d: _____________ Fiscal Clerk: ________________

ISSUANCES

Summons Alias Summons

Third Party Summons Lis Pendens

Non Wage Garnishment Summons Abstract of Judgment

___________________________

 Wage-Deduction Garnishment Summons ___________________________

 (Victim, Against and $ Amount)

 Citation to Discover Assets

Writ _______________________

 (Type of Writ)

 ______Original and __________ copies on ________________ as to ____________________________

 (Date)

 ____________________________________________________________________________________

 ____________________________________________________________________________________

 

C:\wpwin80\docket\feeinfo.frm 03/14/05