alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV 

House Calendar No. 10 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 158 

[Report No. 118–29] 

Of inquiry requesting the President and directing the Secretary of Defense 

and Secretary of State to transmit, respectively, certain documents to 

the House of Representatives relating to congressionally appropriated 

funds to the nation of Ukraine from January 20, 2021 to February 

24, 2023. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 24, 2023 

Ms. GREENE of Georgia (for herself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. MASSIE, Mr. HIGGINS of Louisiana, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. ROY, Mr. BURCHETT, Mr. GOSAR, 

and Mrs. MILLER of Illinois) submitted the following resolution; which 

was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

MARCH 27, 2023 

Additional sponsors: Mr. HUNT, Mr. MOORE of Alabama, Mr. MILLS, Mr. 

DAVIDSON, and Mr. STEUBE

MARCH 27, 2023 

Reported from the Committee on Foreign Affairs; referred to the House 

Calendar and ordered to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Of inquiry requesting the President and directing the Secretary of Defense and Secretary of State to transmit, 

respectively, certain documents to the House of Representatives relating to congressionally appropriated 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 158 RH 

funds to the nation of Ukraine from January 20, 2021 

to February 24, 2023. 

1 Resolved, That the President is requested, and the 

2 Secretary of Defense and Secretary of State are directed, 

3 to transmit, respectively, to the House of Representatives, 

4 not later than 14 days after the date of the adoption of 

5 this resolution, copies of all documents, charts, or tables, 

6 including notes from meetings, audio recordings, records 

7 (including telephone and email records), correspondence, 

8 and other communications, and any financial statements 

9 detailing purchases, recipients, and government expendi10 tures to the extent that any such one or more items are 

11 within the possession of the President or Secretaries afore12 mentioned, respectively, and refer or relate to congression13 ally appropriated funds directed to the nation of 

14 Ukraine—whether in regard to military, civilian, or finan15 cial aid—between January 20, 2021 to February 24, 

16 2023. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
House Calendar No. 10 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 158 

[Report No. 118–29] 

RESOLUTION 

Of inquiry requesting the President and directing 

2023. Ukraine from January 20, 2021 to February 24, sionally appropriated funds to the nation of the House of Representatives relating to congresto transmit, respectively, certain documents to the Secretary of Defense and Secretary of State 

MARCH 27, 2023 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
```

                                                     EXHIBIT 32.2

                   Section 1350 Certification
                 By Principal Financial Officer

     I,  Craig  R.  Jones, certify that the periodic  report,  to
which  this  Statement  is  attached,  fully  complies  with  the
requirements  of  Section 13(a) or 15(d) of  the  Securities  and
Exchange  Act  of  1934,  and the information  contained  in  the
periodic  report  to  which this Statement  is  attached,  fairly
present,  in  all material respects, the financial condition  and
results of operations of the registrant.

     A  signed  original  of  this  written  statement  has  been
provided  to the Company and will be retained by the Company  and
furnished to the SEC upon request.

     Dated December 19, 2003

                              /s/ Craig R. Jones
                              Craig R. Jones
                              Chief Financial Officer
```
THE SECRETARY OF EDUCATION

WASHINGTON, D.C 2020

MEMORANDUM

TO: The Designated Agency Ethics Official 

Deputy Agency Ethics Officials

THROUGH: The General Counsel 

FROM: The Secretary

SUBJECT: Delegation of Authority 

I. DELEGATION

Under the authority vested in me by Section 412 of the Department of Education 

Organization Act (DEOA), 20 U.S.C. Section 3472, Public Law 96-88, I hereby 

delegate to you the authority to serve as an "agency designee" under 5 CFR 

Section 2635.204(g)(2),(3) and (6).

Agency designees under this section of the Standards of Ethical Conduct make 

determinations regarding whether an employee's attendance at a widely attended 

event will further a Department interest, whether an employee may accept a gift to 

attend such an event if the sponsor of the event has interests that may be 

substantially affected by the performance or nonperformance of the employee's 

official duties (this determination must be made in writing), and whether the 

employee may accept an invitation permitting his or her spouse to accompany him 

or her to a widely attended event.

This delegation applies to determinations under these provisions regarding 

acceptance of free attendance for the Deputy Secretary, any other official serving 

in a position nominated by the President and confirmed by the Senate, the Chief of 

Staff, or any other employee whose first or second-line supervisor is the Deputy 

Secretary or the Secretary.

Unless otherwise noted in future delegations of authority, amendments to the 

authority delegated herein are included within the scope of this delegation.

II. RESERVATIONS

None.
III. REDELEGATION

This authority may not be redelegated.

IV. CERTIFICATION AND EFFECTIVE DATE

This delegation is effective upon certificaiton by the Department’s Principal 

Delegations Control Officer.

 /s/ 

 Richard W. Riley

OGC Clearance and Date: /s/ R. Wexler, 4/27/93

Certified Date: 5/10/93

Departmental Delegations Control Officer: /s/ Wilma J. Hodo

Control No. EG/EGB-1/65
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Michael Umbers, Appellant.

In a *coram, nobis*proceeding, defendant appeals from an order of the former County Court, Kings County, dated October 24, 1962 [misdescribed in the notice of appeal as October 22, 1962], which denied without a hearing his application to vacate a judgment of said court, rendered January 6, 1961 after a jury trial, convicting him of attempted grand larceny in the first degree, and imposing sentence. The judgment was affirmed by this court (14 A D 2d 796, mot. for lv. to app. to the Court of Appeals den., Feb. 2, 1962, Fuld, J.). Order affirmed (cf. *People*v. *Weiss,*20 A D 2d 572). Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Brennan, JJ., concur.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

CHARLES CHATT, et al., )

)

Plaintiffs, )

)

v. ) No. 11 C 9267

)

J.B. HUNT TRANSPORT, INC., etc.,)

)

Defendant. )

MEMORANDUM ORDER

Counsel for defendant J.B. Hunt Transport, Inc. (“J.B.

Hunt”) have just managed to chalk up a “first” in this Court’s

experience--and regrettably, not a good one. This Court’s brief

February 8, 2012 memorandum order had identified for counsel

their flawed invocation of the disclaimer provisions of Fed. R.

Civ. P. (“Rule”) 8(b)(5), an obvious defect resulting from

counsel’s apparently not having read that Rule. But given the

opportunity to cure their mistake by filing an amendment to their

Answer, counsel have managed to commit still another obvious

boner.

In J.B. Hunt’s just-filed Amendment to Answer, this time its

counsel have tracked the provisions of the disclaimer accurately

(not a hard task, given the plain terms of Rule 8(b)(5)), but in

each instance that is followed by the assertion that the

corresponding allegation of the Complaint “is therefore denied.” 

That is of course oxymoronic--how can a party that asserts

(presumably in good faith) that it lacks even enough information

Case: 1:11-cv-09267 Document #: 16 Filed: 02/14/12 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:39
to form a belief as to the truth of an allegation then proceed to

deny it in accordance with Rule 11(b)?

Accordingly the Amendment to Answer is stricken. Even

though under the circumstances this Court could well rule that

the questioned allegations of the Complaint are deemed admitted,

no such sanction will be imposed. Instead:

1. Leave is granted once more to J.B. Hunt’s counsel

to return to the drawing board and file a proper Second

Amendment to Answer on or before February 22, 2012.

2. Counsel are ordered once again to make no charge to

J.B. Hunt for the added work and expense incurred in

correcting counsel’s current errors, but as a kind of modest

sanction counsel are ordered to transmit copies of the

February 8 memorandum order and this memorandum order to

their client together with a letter advising the client of

the no-charge commitment, with a copy of that letter to be

transmitted to this Court (for informational purposes, not

for filing).

________________________________________

Milton I. Shadur

Senior United States District Judge

Date: February 14, 2012

2

Case: 1:11-cv-09267 Document #: 16 Filed: 02/14/12 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:40
---

Exhibit 32
      CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Energy Conversion Devices, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Mark D. Morelli, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Harry W. Zike, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, respectively, do each hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that based on his knowledge:  1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   /s/ Mark D. Morelli
 Chief Executive Officer November 10, 2008   /s/ Harry W. Zike
 Harry W. Zike Chief Financial Officer November 10, 2008
### §6o. Fraud and misrepresentation by commodity trading advisors, commodity pool operators, and associated persons

(1) It shall be unlawful for a commodity trading advisor, associated person of a commodity trading advisor, commodity pool operator, or associated person of a commodity pool operator, by use of the mails or any means or instrumentality of interstate commerce, directly or indirectly—

(A) to employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud any client or participant or prospective client or participant; or

(B) to engage in any transaction, practice, or course of business which operates as a fraud or deceit upon any client or participant or prospective client or participant.

(2) It shall be unlawful for any commodity trading advisor, associated person of a commodity trading advisor, commodity pool operator, or associated person of a commodity pool operator registered under this chapter to represent or imply in any manner whatsoever that such person has been sponsored, recommended, or approved, or that such person's abilities or qualifications have in any respect been passed upon, by the United States or any agency or officer thereof. This section shall not be construed to prohibit a statement that a person is registered under this chapter as a commodity trading advisor, associated person of a commodity trading advisor, commodity pool operator, or associated person of a commodity pool operator, if such statement is true in fact and if the effect of such registration is not misrepresented.

(Sept. 21, 1922, ch. 369, §4o, as added Pub. L. 93–463, title II, §205(a), Oct. 23, 1974, 88 Stat. 1399; amended Pub. L. 95–405, §10, Sept. 30, 1978, 92 Stat. 870; Pub. L. 97–444, title II, §214, Jan. 11, 1983, 96 Stat. 2305.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1983—Par. (1). Pub. L. 97–444 made the antifraud prohibition applicable to an associated person of a commodity trading advisor or a commodity pool operator.

Par. (2). Pub. L. 97–444 made the misrepresentation prohibition applicable to an associated person of a commodity training advisor or a commodity pool operator, authorized registration statements of such persons, and substituted "such person" and "such person's abilities" for "he" before "has been sponsored" and "his abilities", respectively.

1978—Par. (1). Pub. L. 95–405 struck out "registered under this chapter" after "pool operator".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1983 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 97–444 effective Jan. 11, 1983, see section 239 of Pub. L. 97–444, set out as a note under section 2 of this title.

#### Effective Date of 1978 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 95–405 effective Oct. 1, 1978, see section 28 of Pub. L. 95–405, set out as a note under section 2 of this title.

#### Effective Date

For effective date of section, see section 418 of Pub. L. 93–463, set out as an Effective Date of 1974 Amendment note under section 2 of this title.
Hover Check Aerial Productions

3025 Windermere Dr  Pensacola, Fl. 32503  Phone: 850-450-3491 

E-Mail: rsimpson@hover-check.com Web: www.hover-check.com

Date: 12/4/2015

To Whom it may concern,

I, Richard J Simpson, owner of Hover Check Aerial Productions, am requesting to add additional AUV aircraft to my 

existing 333 exemption. (Exemption No. 12006, Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2015-0650)

We would like to request adding the following AUV's to our exemption:

DJI S800EVO

DJI S900

DJI S1000+

Each of these UAV's has a return to home capability during signal loss and low battery. Along with flight data information 

provided directly to the PIC in real time.

I have provided links to each of the user manuals for all the AUV's mentioned above below the body of this request. Thank 

you

Hover Check Aerial Productions

3025 Windermere Dr.

Pensacola, Florida 32503

http://dl.djicdn.com/downloads/s800evo/en/S800_EVO_User_Manual_v1.10_en.pdf

http://download.dji-innovations.com/downloads/s900/en/S900_User_Manual_v1.2_en.pdf

http://download.dji-innovations.com/downloads/s1000_plus/en/S1000_Plus_User_Manual_v1.2_en.pdf

Sincerely,

Richard J Simpson II

President/CEO 

Hover Check Aerial Productions
No. 262.

#### Virginia and West Virginia Coal Company *v.*Green Charles.

Error to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.

Motion to dismiss submitted March 8, 1920.

Decided March 15, 1920.

*Mr. A. M. Belcher*and *Mr. S. B. Avis*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. William H. Werth, Mr. A. S. Higenbotham*and *Mr. Edgar Lee Greever*for defendant in error.

*Per Curiam.*

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of: (1) Section 128 of the Judicial Code; *Shulthis*v. *McDougal,*225 U. S. 561, 568; *Hull*v. *Burr,*234 U. S. 712, 720; *St. Anthony Church*v. *Pennsylvania R. R. Co.,*237 U. S. 575, 577; *Delaware, Lackawanna & Western R. R. Co.*v. *Yurkonis,*238 U. S. 439, 444. (2) *Spencer*v. *Duplan Silk Co.,*191 U. S. 526, 530; *Devine*v. *Los Angeles, 202*U. S. 313, 333; *Shulthis*v. *McDougal,*225 U. S. 561, 569.
§ 66.5 Responsibilities. ( a ) Under the authority, direction, and control of the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness (USD(P&R)), the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Manpower and Reserve Affairs (ASD(M&RA)): ( 1 ) Acts as an advisor to the USD(P&R) on the Reserve enlistment and appointment standards.
( 2 ) Acts as an advisor to the USD(P&R) on the height and weight requirements of the standards in § 66.6.
( 3 ) Ensures the U.S. Military Entrance Processing Command assists the Military Services in implementing the standards in § 66.6.
( b ) Under the authority, direction, and control of the USD(P&R), the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs (ASD(HA)) acts as an advisor to the USD(P&R) on the medical requirements of the standards in § 66.6.
( c ) The Secretaries of the Military Departments: ( 1 ) Oversee conformance with this part.
( 2 ) Recommend suggested changes to this part to the USD(P&R) as necessary.
( 3 ) Establish other Service-specific standards as necessary to implement this part.
( 4 ) Review all standards on an annual basis.
( 5 ) Establish procedures to grant waivers, accomplish reviews, and require individuals to meet the appropriate standards or be granted an exception pursuant to 10 U.S.C. 504(a).
( 6 ) Request approval from the USD(P&R) for generalized exceptions to these standards as permitted by law.
( 7 ) Use the standards in § 66.6 to determine the entrance qualifications for all individuals being enlisted, appointed, or inducted into any component of the Military Services.
[80 FR 16270, Mar. 27, 2015, as amended at 81 FR 64063, Sept. 19, 2016]
Fiscal Year 2006 Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies - DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Maximum Required

Expenditures For 

Choice-Related Maximum Per-Child

Transportation Expenditure For

FY 2006 Title I And Supplemental Supplemental

LEA ID District Allocation* Educational Services** Educational Services***

1100030 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PUBLIC SCHOOLS 48,702,200 9,740,440 2,245

1199998 Undistributed 0 0 0

1199999 PART D SUBPART 2 0 0 0

* Actual amounts received by LEAs will be smaller than shown here due to State-level adjustments to Federal Title I allocations. States adjust

 allocations, for example, to reflect LEA boundary changes or the creation of new LEAs, including charter school LEAs, that are not accounted

 for in the statutory calculations. States also are permitted to reserve up to 1 percent of allocations for administration and generally must

 reserve 4 percent in fiscal year 2006 for school improvement activities. These adjustments will reduce the actual amounts available

 under all three columns of the table.

** An LEA must use up to an amount equal to 20 percent of its Title I, Part A allocation (the “20-percent reservation”) received from the State 

 to cover choice-related transportation costs for students who exercise a choice option and to pay for supplemental educational services for

 students whose parents request such services. The 20-percent reservation may include Title I, Part A funds or funding from other Federal,

 State, local, and private sources. The amount shown in this column is the Department’s estimate of the amount that affected LEAs - those

 with schools identified for improvement, corrective action, or restructuring - may have to spend to meet this requirement. Actual 

 expenditures will depend on such factors as the number of students exercising a choice option or receiving supplemental educational services and

 the costs of satisfying these requests. An LEA has discretion to determine the allocation of these funds between choice-related transportation

 and supplemental educational services, except that it must spend at least one-quarter of the 20-percent reservation - or an amount equal to

 5 percent of its Title I, Part A allocation - on each activity if there is demand for both from students and their parents.

*** An LEA that must arrange for supplemental educational services is required to pay, for each child receiving services, the lesser of the actual cost

 of the services or an amount equal to the LEA’s Title I, Part A allocation received from the State divided by the number of poor students in the

 LEA, as determined by estimates produced by the US Bureau of the Census. Thus the amount shown in this column reflects the statutory “cap”

 on per-child expenditures for supplemental educational services.
**Exhibit 31.2**
**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**
I, Jeffrey D. Buchanan, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Three-Five Systems,Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have:
 a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter inthe case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.
Date: November 9, 2004     /s/ Jeffrey D. Buchanan   Jeffrey D. Buchanan Chief Financial Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

CASE NO. 1:12-cv-00261

WAYNE and CARRIE HERR,

Plaintiff,

v.

STELLAR RECOVERY, INC.,

Defendant.

_____________________________________/

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that all claims pending have been resolved to the 

parties’ satisfaction. 

Plaintiffs hereby respectfully request that this Court allow sixty (60) days within 

which to complete the settlement, during which time Plaintiffs request the Court to retain 

jurisdiction over this matter until fully resolved.

Should Plaintiffs not move to reinstate the case or seek other Court intervention in 

the next sixty (60) days, Plaintiffs request the Court dismiss this case with prejudice at 

that time. 

Respectfully submitted,

WAYNE and CARRIE HERR

By: s/ Alex Weisberg 

 ALEX D. WEISBERG

 IBN: 6271510

 WEISBERG & MEYERS, LLC

 ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFFS

 5722 S. Flamingo Road, Ste. 656

 Cooper City, FL 33330

 (954) 212-2184

 (866) 577-0963 fax

 aweisberg@attorneysforconsumers.com

Case: 1:12-cv-00261 Document #: 9 Filed: 03/16/12 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:19
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT this Notice was filed on this 16th day of March, 2012, 

by means of the CM/ECF system which will send notice of electronic filing to the following: 

Mr. Nicholas D. O’Conner, noconner@hinshawlaw.com and Mr. David Schultz, 

dschultz@hinshawlaw.com.

By: s/ Alex Weisberg 

 ALEX D. WEISBERG

 IBN: 6271510

 WEISBERG & MEYERS, LLC

 ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFFS

 5722 S. Flamingo Road, Ste. 656

 Cooper City, FL 33330

 (954) 212-2184

 (866) 577-0963 fax

 aweisberg@attorneysforconsumers.com

Case: 1:12-cv-00261 Document #: 9 Filed: 03/16/12 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:20