alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 21.420 Under what types of statutory authorities do DoD Components award assistance instruments? DoD Components may use assistance instruments under a number of statutory authorities that fall into three categories: ( a ) *Authorities that statutes provide to the Secretary of Defense.* These authorities generally are delegated by the Secretary of Defense to Heads of DoD Components, usually through DoD directives, instructions, or policy memoranda that are not part of the Defense Grant and Agreement Regulatory System. Examples of statutory authorities in this category are: ( 1 ) Authority under 10 U.S.C. 2391 to award grants or cooperative agreements to help State and local governments alleviate serious economic impacts of defense program changes (*e.g.,* base openings and closings, contract changes, and personnel reductions and increases).
( 2 ) Authority under 10 U.S.C. 2413 to enter into cooperative agreements with entities that furnish procurement technical assistance to businesses.
( b ) *Authorities that statutes may provide directly to Heads of DoD Components.* When a statute authorizes the Head of a DoD Component to use a funding instrument to carry out a program with a principal purpose of assistance, use of that authority requires no delegation by the Secretary of Defense. For example, 10 U.S.C. 2358 authorizes the Secretaries of the Military Departments, in addition to the Secretary of Defense, to perform research and development projects through grants and cooperative agreements. Similarly, 10 U.S.C. 2371 provides authority for the Secretaries of the Military Departments and Secretary of Defense to carry out basic, applied, or advanced research projects using assistance instruments other than grants and cooperative agreements. A Military Department's use of the authority of 10 U.S.C. 2358 or 10 U.S.C. 2371 therefore requires no delegation by the Secretary of Defense.
( c ) *Authorities that arise indirectly as the result of statute.* For example, authority to use an assistance instrument may result from: ( 1 ) A federal statute authorizing a program that is consistent with an assistance relationship (*i.e.,* the support or stimulation of a public purpose, rather than the acquisition of a good or service for the direct benefit of the Department of Defense). In accordance with 31 U.S.C. chapter 63, such a program would appropriately be carried out through the use of grants or cooperative agreements. Depending upon the nature of the program (*e.g.,* research) and whether the program statute includes authority for any specific types of instruments, there also may be authority to use other assistance instruments.
( 2 ) Exemptions requested by the Department of Defense and granted by the Office of Management and Budget under 31 U.S.C. 6307, as described in 32 CFR 22.220.
HeinOnline -- 51 Fed. Reg. 33991 1986HeinOnline -- 51 Fed. Reg. 33992 1986HeinOnline -- 51 Fed. Reg. 33993 1986HeinOnline -- 51 Fed. Reg. 33994 1986HeinOnline -- 51 Fed. Reg. 33995 1986HeinOnline -- 51 Fed. Reg. 33996 1986HeinOnline -- 51 Fed. Reg. 33997 1986HeinOnline -- 51 Fed. Reg. 33998 1986HeinOnline -- 51 Fed. Reg. 33999 1986HeinOnline -- 51 Fed. Reg. 34000 1986HeinOnline -- 51 Fed. Reg. 34001 1986HeinOnline -- 51 Fed. Reg. 34002 1986HeinOnline -- 51 Fed. Reg. 34003 1986
#### Eugene Brown and Deloss Brown, trading as Brown Brothers, appellees, v. Hajo H. Block, appellant.

Gen. No. 7,426.

Assumpsit to recover commission on sale of real estate. Judgment for plaintiffs. Appeal from the County Court of Peoria county; the Hon. Glen J. Cameron, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1924.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed March 27, 1925.

Hunter, Page & Kavanagh, for appellant.

Tichenor, Todd, Wilson & Barnett, for appellees.

Mr. Presiding Justice Jett

delivered the opinion of the court.
Exhibit 12
                       E'TOWN CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
                Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
                           (In Thousands Except Ratios)


                                                     Three Months Ended
                                                           March 31,
                                                      1999            1998
EARNINGS:

Net income                                            $ 6,300     $    4,163
Federal income taxes                                    3,456          2,307
Interest charges                                        4,482          4,216
                                                  ---------------------------
 Earnings available to cover fixed charges             14,238         10,686
                                                  ---------------------------

FIXED CHARGES:
Interest on long-term debt                              4,134          3,985
Other interest                                            291            214
Amortization of debt discount - net                       110            108
                                                  ---------------------------
Total fixed charges                                   $ 4,535     $    4,307
                                                  ---------------------------

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges                       3.14           2.48
                                                  ===========================





Earnings to Fixed Charges represents the sum of Net Income,
Federal income taxes and Interest Charges (which is reduced by
Capitalized interest), divided by Fixed Charges.
Fixed Charges consist of interest on long and short-term debt (which is not
reduced by Capitalized Interest), and Amortization of debt discount.
Restricted Stock Award Grant Program for Non-Employee Directors



 Exhibit 10.11 
 RESTRICTED STOCK AWARD GRANT PROGRAM 
 FOR 
 NONEMPLOYEE DIRECTORS 
 UNDER THE

 MERIX CORPORATION 1994 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN 
 The following provisions set forth the terms of the restricted stock award program (the “Program”) for nonemployee directors of Merix Corporation (the “Company”) under the Company’s 1994 Stock
Incentive Plan (the “Plan”). The following terms are intended to supplement, not alter or change, the provisions of the Plan, and in the event of any inconsistency between the terms contained herein and in the Plan, the Plan shall
govern. All capitalized terms that are not defined herein shall be as defined in the Plan. 
 1. Eligibility 
 Each director of the Company elected or appointed to the Board who is not, and has not been within one year of any date as of which a determination of eligibility is
made, an employee of the Company or any Related Company (an “Eligible Director”) shall be eligible to receive New Grants and Annual Grants under the Plan, as discussed below. 
 2. New Grants 
 Each Eligible Director shall automatically receive a
Restricted Stock Award for shares of Common Stock (“New Grant”) upon such Eligible Director’s initial election or appointment to the Board. The number of shares granted will be determined by dividing $10,000 by the fair
market value of a share of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. 
 3. Annual Grants 
 Each Eligible Director shall automatically receive a Restricted Stock Award for shares of Common Stock on each anniversary of such Eligible Director’s initial
election or appointment to the Board (each, an “Annual Grant”). The number of shares granted will be determined by dividing $10,000 by the fair market value of a share of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant.

 4. Vesting and Restriction on Sale of Shares 
 The New
Grants and Annual Grants shall be fully vested on the grant date, but will be subject to a restricted stock award agreement between the Company and each recipient prohibiting the sale or other disposition of such shares so long as the recipient
remains a director of the Company. The agreement will also provide that any director who resigns from the Board 








 
without the consent of a majority of the Board of Directors then in office will forfeit all such stock awards. 
 5. Amendment 
 The Board may amend the provisions contained herein in
such respects as it deems advisable. Any such amendment shall not, without the consent of the Eligible Director, materially adversely affect any rights of an Eligible Director under an outstanding option. 
 6. Effective Date 
 The Program shall become effective on
January 1, 2006.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 01-40466

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOSE DE LA PAZ VILLALOBOS-ANDRADE,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. L-00-CR-1336-1

--------------------

February 21, 2002

Before JOLLY, JONES, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jose

De La Paz Villalobos-Andrade (Villalobos) has moved for leave to

withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Villalobos, who pleaded guilty

to violating 8 U.S.C. § 1326, has received a copy of counsel’s

motion and brief but has filed no response.

Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses

no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion

for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
No. 01-40466

-2-

responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH

CIR. R. 42.2.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> UT
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                        1,338
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                        837
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                           1,993
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                            18
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                     188
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   4,374
<COMMON>                                             0
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                        1,014
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                               (18)
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                     996
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              147
<PREFERRED>                                         75
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                               947
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   1
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                        0
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                   2,208
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                    4,374
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                        1,338
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                                 5
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                       1,359
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                       1,359
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                           (21)
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                  52
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                      31
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            19
<NET-INCOME>                                         7
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                          1
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                        6
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                             0
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                            0
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                            (26)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00


</TABLE>
-82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72

36 38 40 

### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 06/19 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 19 Jun 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.77 N 77.11 WMeters AGL
-       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2022-04-13T07:41:42-0400
      - Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401
      - Government Publishing Office
      - Government Publishing Office attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by Government Publishing Office
EXHIBIT 32 (a)

CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of Enzo Biochem, Inc., and Subsidiaries (the
Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2009 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Elazar Rabbani, Ph.D., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| |  |     |                                                                                                                                                       
| |  | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | (1) | The Report fully
 complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities
 Exchange Act of 1934; and                             
| |  |     |                                                                                                                                                       
| |  | (2) | The information
 contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
 financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                         |     |                           
|------------------------ | --- | --------------------------
|Dated: October 14,
 2009 |     |                           
|                         | By: | /s/ Elazar
 Rabbani, Ph.D.
|                         |     |                           
|                         |     | Elazar Rabbani,
 Ph.D.    
|                         |     | Chief Executive
 Officer  

A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Act Commission or its
staff upon request.

---
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Stephen F. Smith, Chief Financial Officer of EXCO Resources, Inc.
certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Form 10-K on Form 10-K/A of EXCO Resources, Inc.; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |  |  |  |  |                        
|-------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | -----------------------
|Date: April 19, 2011 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ Stephen F. Smith   
|                     |  |  |  |  |  | Stephen F. Smith       
|                     |  |  |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer
### §511p. Delegation of duties by Secretary of Agriculture

Any duties devolving upon the Secretary of Agriculture by virtue of the provisions of this chapter may with like force and effect be executed by such officer or officers, agent or agents, of the Department of Agriculture as the Secretary may designate for the purpose.

(Aug. 23, 1935, ch. 623, §17, 49 Stat. 735.)
### §427h. Repealed. Aug. 11, 1955, ch. 790, §2, 69 Stat. 674

Section, act June 29, 1935, ch. 338, title I, §9, as added Aug. 14, 1946, ch. 966, title I, §101(2), 60 Stat. 1083, authorized appropriations for agricultural experiment stations, provided for availability of funds and unexpended balances, and prescribed allotments for the experiment stations. See sections 361c, 361d, and 361g of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Existing Rights and Liabilities

Any rights or liabilities existing under this section unaffected by repeal, see section 2 of act Aug. 11, 1955, set out as a note under former section 361 of this title.
# U nit edSta tes C ou rt o f A pp eal s For t h e Firs t C ircu it

No. 09-1149 ASTRID G. ESTRADA; WENDY M. ESTRADA; GUILFREDO E. MUÑOZ; JOSÉ A. AQUINO; CRUZ F. RIVERA; CARLOS E. TAMUP; JOSÉ BURGOS; ABELINO M. URIZAR; ISRAEL TEBALAN; ROLANDO NORIEGA; BORIS CRUZ; ELSA HERNÁNDEZ VILAVICENCIO,

Plaintiffs, Appellants,

v. STATE OF RHODE ISLAND, State Police Department; STEVEN M. PARE, individually and in his official capacity as Superintendent of the Rhode Island State Police; C. THOMAS CHABOT, individually and in his official capacity as a state trooper employed by the State of Rhode Island, Defendants, Appellees, JANE DOE, individually and in her official capacity as a state trooper employed by the State of Rhode Island, Defendant.

ERRATA SHEET Chief Judge Lynch's concurrence in the opinion of this Court issued on February 4, 2010 is amended as follows: On page 28, line 3, "I do not rely on it" should be replaced with "I do not rely on them" On page 28, line 4, "because the admission is not contained" should be replaced with "because the admissions are not contained"
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Credit Union Administration

# TIME AND DATE:

10:00 a.m., Thursday, January 14, 2021

*Recess:*                     12:15 p.m.                

12:30 p.m., Thursday, January 14, 2021

# PLACE: 

                        Due to the COVID-19 Pandemic, the meeting will be open to the public via live webcast only. Visit the agency's homepage (                        *www.ncua.gov*.) and access the provided webcast link.                    

# STATUS: 

Parts of this meeting will be open to the public. The rest of the meeting will be closed to the public.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

# PORTIONS OPEN TO THE PUBLIC:

1. Board Briefing, ACCESS Initiative.

2. NCUA Rules and Regulations, Credit Union Service Organizations.

3. Board Briefing, Statutory Inflation Adjustment of Civil Monetary Penalties.

4. NCUA Rules and Regulations, Corporate Credit Unions.

5. NCUA Rules and Regulations, CAMELS Rating System.

6. NCUA Rules and Regulations, Risk Based Net Worth, Complex Threshold.

7. NCUA's 2021 Annual Performance Plan.

                        8. Board Briefing, Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021.                              ( print page 2003)    

9. NCUA Rules and Regulations, Simplification of Risk Based Capital Requirements.

# PORTIONS CLOSED TO THE PUBLIC:

 

1. Supervisory Action. Closed pursuant to Exemptions (7), (8) and (9)(ii).

2. Supervisory Action. Closed pursuant to Exemptions (5), (7), (8), (9)(i)(B) and (9)(ii).

3. Delegation of Authority. Closed pursuant to Exemption (2).

4. Personnel Action. Closed pursuant to Exemptions (2) and (6).

5. Personnel Action. Closed pursuant to Exemptions (2) and (6).

6. Board Briefing. Closed pursuant to Exemption (8).

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Melane Conyers-Ausbrooks, Secretary of the Board, Telephone: 703-518-6304.

Melane Conyers-Ausbrooks,

Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2021-00473 Filed 1-8-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7535-01-P
#### CHICORA COUNTRY CLUB v. TOWN OF ERWIN

No. 23P98

Case below: 128 N.GApp. 101

Petition by petitioners for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 5 March 1998.
1.501-3 Exceptions. ( a ) Comments need not be solicited when the proposed coverage does not constitute a significant revision.
( b ) Advance comments need not be solicited when urgent and compelling circumstances make solicitation of comments impracticable prior to the effective date of the coverage, such as when a new statute must be implemented in a relatively short period of time. In such case, the coverage shall be issued on a temporary basis and shall provide for at least a 30 day public comment period.
§ 651.22 Notice of intent. A Notice of Intent (NOI) is a public notice that an EIS will be prepared. The NOI will briefly: ( a ) Describe the proposed and alternative actions.
( b ) Describe the proposed scoping process, including when and where any public meetings will be held.
( c ) State the name and address of the POC who can answer questions on the proposed action and the EIS (see § 651.45(a) and § 651.49 for application).
#### 1201.604-70 Contract clause.

The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 1252.201-70, Contracting Officer's Representative, in solicitations and contracts that are identified as other than firm-fixed-price, and for firm-fixed-price solicitations and contracts when appointment of a contracting officer's representative is anticipated.
Editorial Note on Part 842
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 842 appear at 81 FR 83688, Nov. 22, 2016.

§ 842.8 Insured claimants. Insured claimants must make a detailed disclosure of their insurance coverage by stating: ( a ) Their name and address.
( b ) Kind, amount, and dates of coverage of insurance.
( c ) Insurance policy number.
( d ) Whether a claim was presented to the insurer and, if so, in what amount.
( e ) Whether the insurer paid or is expected to pay the claim.
( f ) The amount of any payment made or promised.