alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §3352. Agriculture research facility expansion and security upgrades

#### (a) In general

To enhance the security of agriculture in the United States against threats posed by bioterrorism, the Secretary shall make expansion or security upgrade grants on a competitive basis to colleges and universities (as defined in section 3103(4) of this title).

#### (b) Limitation on grants

Grants to a recipient under this section shall not exceed $10,000,000 in any fiscal year.

#### (c) Requirements for grants

The Secretary shall make a grant under this section only if the grant applicant provides satisfactory assurances to the Secretary that—

(1) sufficient funds are available to pay the non-Federal share of the cost of the proposed expansion or security upgrades; and

(2) the proposed expansion or security upgrades meet such reasonable qualifications as may be established by the Secretary with respect to biosafety and biosecurity requirements necessary to protect facility staff, members of the public, and the food supply.

#### (d) Additional requirements for grants for facility expansion

The Secretary shall make a grant under this section for the expansion, renovation, remodeling, or alteration (collectively referred to in this section as "expansion") of a facility only if the grant applicant provides such assurances as the Secretary determines to be satisfactory to ensure the following:

(1) For not less than 20 years after the grant is awarded, the facility shall be used for the purposes of the research for which the facility was expanded, as described in the grant application.

(2) Sufficient funds will be available, as of the date of completion of the expansion, for the effective use of the facility for the purposes of the research for which the facility was expanded.

(3) The proposed expansion—

(A) will increase the capability of the applicant to conduct research for which the facility was expanded; or

(B) is necessary to improve the quality of the research of the applicant.

#### (e) Amount of grant

The amount of a grant awarded under this section shall be determined by the Secretary.

#### (f) Federal share

The Federal share of the cost of any expansion or security upgrade carried out using funds from a grant provided under this section shall not exceed 50 percent.

#### (g) Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section such sums as are necessary for each fiscal year.

(Pub. L. 95–113, title XIV, §1485, as added Pub. L. 107–171, title VII, §7221(a), May 13, 2002, 116 Stat. 453.)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 22
- 0655 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. CHRISTOPHER PAUL MCKEEN,

Defendant and Appellant
.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including October 13 , 2023 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 6 2023

09/06/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0655
Fiscal Year 2005 Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies - HAWAII

Maximum Required

Expenditures For 

Choice-Related Maximum Per-Child

Transportation Expenditure For

FY 2005 Title I And Supplemental Supplemental

LEA ID District Allocation* Educational Services** Educational Services***

1500001 Hawaii County 7,949,666 1,589,933 1,707.40

1500003 Honolulu County 33,668,329 6,733,666 1,854.49

1500005 Kalawao County 0 0 0.00

1500007 Kauai County 2,006,595 401,319 1,424.13

1500009 Maui County 3,918,621 783,724 1,344.76

1599998 Undistributed 0 0 0.00

1599999 PART D SUBPART 2 0 0 0.00

* Actual amounts received by LEAs will be smaller than shown here due to State-level adjustments to Federal Title I allocations. States adjust

 allocations, for example, to reflect LEA boundary changes or the creation of new LEAs, including charter school LEAs, that are not accounted

 for in the statutory calculations. States also are permitted to reserve up to 1 percent of allocations for administration and generally must

 reserve 4 percent in fiscal year 2005 for school improvement activities. These adjustments will reduce the actual amounts available

 under all three columns of the table.

** An LEA must use up to an amount equal to 20 percent of its Title I, Part A allocation (the “20-percent reservation”) received from the State 

 to cover choice-related transportation costs for students who exercise a choice option and to pay for supplemental educational services for

 students whose parents request such services. The 20-percent reservation may include Title I, Part A funds or funding from other Federal,

 State, local, and private sources. The amount shown in this column is the Department’s estimate of the amount that affected LEAs - those

 with schools identified for improvement, corrective action, or restructuring - may have to spend to meet this requirement. Actual 

 expenditures will depend on such factors as the number of students exercising a choice option or receiving supplemental educational services and

 the costs of satisfying these requests. An LEA has discretion to determine the allocation of these funds between choice-related transportation

 and supplemental educational services, except that it must spend at least one-quarter of the 20-percent reservation - or an amount equal to

 5 percent of its Title I, Part A allocation - on each activity if there is demand for both from students and their parents.

*** An LEA that must arrange for supplemental educational services is required to pay, for each child receiving services, the lesser of the actual cost

 of the services or an amount equal to the LEA’s Title I, Part A allocation received from the State divided by the number of poor students in the

 LEA, as determined by estimates produced by the US Bureau of the Census. Thus the amount shown in this column reflects the statutory “cap”

 on per-child expenditures for supplemental educational services.
#### Max Offenberg et al., Respondents, v. Benson Chevrolet, Inc., Appellant.

In action to recover damages for personal injuries, loss of services and medical expenses, arising out of defendant’s alleged negligence, the defendant appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, in favor of the plaintiffs, rendered March 18, 1969, after trial before a Special Referee. Judgment reversed on the law and the facts and a new trial ordered, with costs to defendant to abide the event. In our opinion, the conclusion that the accident was caused by negligence on the part of defendant is contrary to the weight of the credible evidence. Nolan, P. J., Christ and Brennan, JJ., concur; Beldock and Pette, JJ., dissent and vote to affirm.
### §8756. Planting flexibility

#### (a) Permitted crops

Subject to subsection (b), any commodity or crop may be planted on the base acres for peanuts on a farm.

#### (b) Limitations regarding certain commodities

#### (1) General limitation

The planting of an agricultural commodity specified in paragraph (3) shall be prohibited on base acres for peanuts unless the commodity, if planted, is destroyed before harvest.

#### (2) Treatment of trees and other perennials

The planting of an agricultural commodity specified in paragraph (3) that is produced on a tree or other perennial plant shall be prohibited on base acres for peanuts.

#### (3) Covered agricultural commodities

Paragraphs (1) and (2) apply to the following agricultural commodities:

(A) Fruits.

(B) Vegetables (other than mung beans and pulse crops).

(C) Wild rice.

#### (c) Exceptions

Paragraphs (1) and (2) of subsection (b) shall not limit the planting of an agricultural commodity specified in paragraph (3) of that subsection—

(1) in any region in which there is a history of double-cropping of peanuts with agricultural commodities specified in subsection (b)(3), as determined by the Secretary, in which case the double-cropping shall be permitted;

(2) on a farm that the Secretary determines has a history of planting agricultural commodities specified in subsection (b)(3) on the base acres for peanuts, except that direct payments and counter-cyclical payments shall be reduced by an acre for each acre planted to such an agricultural commodity; or

(3) by the producers on a farm that the Secretary determines has an established planting history of a specific agricultural commodity specified in subsection (b)(3), except that—

(A) the quantity planted may not exceed the average annual planting history of such agricultural commodity by the producers on the farm in the 1991 through 1995 or 1998 through 2001 crop years (excluding any crop year in which no plantings were made), as determined by the Secretary; and

(B) direct payments and counter-cyclical payments shall be reduced by an acre for each acre planted to such agricultural commodity.

(Pub. L. 110–234, title I, §1306, May 22, 2008, 122 Stat. 973; Pub. L. 110–246, §4(a), title I, §1306, June 18, 2008, 122 Stat. 1664, 1702.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Pub. L. 110–234 and Pub. L. 110–246 enacted identical sections. Pub. L. 110–234 was repealed by section 4(a) of Pub. L. 110–246.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Enactment of this section and repeal of Pub. L. 110–234 by Pub. L. 110–246 effective May 22, 2008, the date of enactment of Pub. L. 110–234, see section 4 of Pub. L. 110–246, set out as a note under section 8701 of this title.
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 234 (Friday, December 4, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 78345-78346]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-26752]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Aging; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.


[[Page 78346]]


    Name of Committee: National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis 
Panel; Diet and Aging.
    Date: January 15, 2021.
    Time: 1:00 p.m. to 3:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, 7201 
Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892, (Video Meeting).
    Contact Person: Anita H. Undale, MD, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Branch, National Institute on Aging, 
National Institutes of Health, Gateway Building, Suite 2W200, 7201 
Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 827-7428, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#583936312c39762d363c39343d18363130763f372e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="3b5a55524f5a154e555f5a575e7b555253155c544d">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging 
Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: December 1, 2020.
Miguelina Perez,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2020-26752 Filed 12-3-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
### §593. Hiring authority

In hiring personnel for the Office, the Secretary shall have the hiring and management authorities provided in section 1101 1 of the Strom Thurmond National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1999 (5 U.S.C. 3104 note). The term of appointments for employees under subsection (c)(1) of such section may not exceed 5 years before granting any extension under subsection (c)(2) of such section.

(Pub. L. 107–296, title XIX, §1924, formerly title XVIII, §1803, as added Pub. L. 109–347, title V, §501(a), Oct. 13, 2006, 120 Stat. 1934; renumbered title XIX, §1903, Pub. L. 110–53, title I, §104(a)(1), (2), Aug. 3, 2007, 121 Stat. 294; renumbered §1924, Pub. L. 115–387, §2(a)(5), Dec. 21, 2018, 132 Stat. 5163.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 1101 of the Strom Thurmond National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1999, referred to in text, is section 1101 of Pub. L. 105–261, which was formerly set out as a note under section 3104 of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 114–328, div. A, title XI, §1121(b), Dec. 23, 2016, 130 Stat. 2452. See section 4092 of Title 10, Armed Forces.

1 See References in Text note below.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 658 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 658

   To treat all controlled substance analogues, other than chemical 
 substances subject to the Toxic Substances Control Act, as controlled 
 substances in schedule I regardless of whether they are intended for 
                           human consumption.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 15, 2017

 Mr. Hoeven (for himself and Mr. Coons) introduced the following bill; 
  which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To treat all controlled substance analogues, other than chemical 
 substances subject to the Toxic Substances Control Act, as controlled 
 substances in schedule I regardless of whether they are intended for 
                           human consumption.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Illegal Synthetic Drug Safety Act of 
2017''.

SEC. 2. TREATMENT OF CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE ANALOGUES.

    Section 203 of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 813) is 
amended by striking ``shall, to the extent intended for human 
consumption,'' and inserting the following: ``that is not a chemical 
substance subject to the Toxic Substances Control Act (15 U.S.C. 2601 
et seq.) shall''.
                                 <all>
```
§ 1909.5 Requirements as to who may apply. ( a ) *Historical researchers* — ( 1 ) *In general.* Any historical researcher as defined above may submit a request in writing to the Coordinator to be given access to classified information for purposes of that research. Any such request shall indicate the nature, purpose, and scope of the research project.
( 2 ) *Additional considerations.* In light of the very limited Agency resources, it is the policy of the Agency to consider applications for access by historical researchers (other than research associates) only in those instances where the researcher's needs cannot be satisfied through requests for access to reasonably described records under the Freedom of Information Act or the mandatory declassification review provisions of Executive Order 13526, and where issues of internal resource availability and fairness to all members of the historical research community militate in favor of a particular grant.
( b ) Former Presidential and Vice Presidential appointees or designees. Any former Presidential or Vice Presidential appointee or designee as defined herein may also submit a request to be given access to any classified items which they originated, reviewed, signed, or received while serving in that capacity. Requests from such appointees or designees shall be in writing to the Coordinator and shall identify the records containing the classified information of interest. Such appointees or designees may also request approval for a research associate, but there is no entitlement to such enlargement of access and the decision in this regard shall be in the sole discretion of the Senior Agency Official.
( c ) Former Presidents and Vice Presidents. Any former President or Vice President may submit a request for access to classified CIA information. Requests from former Presidents or Vice Presidents shall be in writing to the Coordinator and shall identify the records containing the classified information of interest. A former President or Vice President may also request approval for a research associate, but there is no entitlement to such enlargement of access and the decision in this regard shall be in the sole discretion of the Senior Agency Official
From: <Alicea.Jezebele@epamail.epa.gov>

To: steam_record <steam_record@erg.com>, <Jordan.Ronald@epamail.epa.gov>

Date: 8/16/2010 8:46 AM

Subject: Fw: Extension for Questionnaire for Steam Electric Power Generating Effluent

For the record - this request was sent on June 21. This request was

answered today.

----- Forwarded by Jezebele Alicea/DC/USEPA/US on 08/16/2010 08:43 AM

-----

 

 From: "Gary Ambrus" <gambrus@wyan.org> 

 To: Jezebele Alicea/DC/USEPA/US@EPA 

 Cc: "'Kerry McLenon'" <kmclenon@wyan.org>, "'Melanie McCoy'" <mmccoy@wyan.org>, "'Jim 

French'" 

 <jfrench@wyan.org> 

 

 Date: 08/16/2010 08:08 AM 

 Subject: RE: Extention for Questionnaire for Steam Electric Power Generating Effluent 

Alicea;

The request was sent via Email (June 21, 2010).....see Email below in

red.........and I also left a voice mail sometime thereafter.

Our plant ID # 03236

Thanks

Gary L. Ambrus, CHMM, CMfgT

Environmental Coordinator

Wyandotte Municipal Service-Power Plant

2555 Van Alstyne

Wyandotte, Michigan 48192

(734) 324-7175 Fax (734) 324-7178

gambrus@wyan.org

-----Original Message-----

From: Alicea.Jezebele@epamail.epa.gov [
mailto:Alicea.Jezebele@epamail.epa.gov]

Sent: Monday, August 16, 2010 8:01 AM

To: Gary Ambrus

Subject: RE: Extension for Questionnaire for Steam Electric Power

Generating Effluent

Hi Gary,

Was the extension request sent by email or regular mail? Please provide

the plant name and id when responding this email and we'll check the

status of your extension request.

Sincerely,

(Embedded image moved to file: pic28252.jpg)

 From: "Gary Ambrus" <gambrus@wyan.org>

 To: Jezebele Alicea/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

 Cc: "'Kerry McLenon'" <kmclenon@wyan.org>

 Date: 08/13/2010 02:57 PM

 Subject: RE: Extension for Questionnaire for Steam Electric Power

Generating Effluent

Ms. Alicia;

As of today have not received a response to my extension request.

Also, left you a voice mail on your phone this afternoon concerning

this.

Please advise

Gary L. Ambrus, CHMM, CMfgT

Environmental Coordinator

Wyandotte Municipal Service-Power Plant

2555 Van Alstyne

Wyandotte, Michigan 48192

(734) 324-7175 Fax (734) 324-7178

gambrus@wyan.org
From: Gary Ambrus [mailto:gambrus@wyan.org]

Sent: Monday, June 21, 2010 3:40 PM

To: 'Alicea.jezebele@epa.gov'

Cc: 'Kerry McLenon'

Subject: RE: Questionnaire for Steam Electric Power Generating Effluent

Guidelines

Ms. Alicea;

On behalf of Wyandotte Municipal Services-Power Plant (ID # 03236), I

would like to request an extension of the report deadline of at least 30

days or longer if possible. The report package was received today. Our

due date would be September 20th under the 90 day request

We are a small municipal power plant with limited staff.

Every effort to submit the report within 90 days will be undertaken in

either case.

Gary L. Ambrus, CHMM, CMfgT

Environmental Coordinator

Wyandotte Municipal Service-Power Plant

2555 Van Alstyne

Wyandotte, Michigan 48192

(734) 324-7175 Fax (734) 324-7178

gambrus@wyan.org
### §723. Metropolitan Medical Response Grant Program

#### (a) In general

There is a Metropolitan Medical Response Program.

#### (b) Purposes

The program shall include each purpose of the program as it existed on June 1, 2006.

#### (c) Authorization of appropriations

There is authorized to be appropriated to carry out the program for fiscal year 2008, an amount equal to the amount appropriated for the program for fiscal year 2007 and an additional $30,000,000.

(Pub. L. 109–295, title VI, §635, Oct. 4, 2006, 120 Stat. 1421.)
#### STATE v. MATHIS

No. 10PA98

Case below: 126 N.C.App. 688

Petition by Attorney General for writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals allowed 5 February 1998. Motion by Attorney General to amend petition for certiorari pursuant to G.S. 7A-32 allowed 5 February 1998. Motion by defendant to dismiss denied 5 February 1998.
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Albert Kirk against Henry J. Noble, as Warden.

Motion to dismiss appeal granted. Concur — Botein, ,P. J., Breitel, Rabin, Valente and McNally, JJ.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS, EASTERN DIVISION

PETER MORJAL, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

vs. ) 12 CV 185

)

The CITY OF CHICAGO, et al., ) Judge LEFKOW

)

Defendants. )

JOINT AGREED MOTION FOR ENTRY OF 

ORDER GRANTING ATTORNEYS’ FEES 

Plaintiff, PETER MORJAL, by his attorney, Torreya L. Hamilton, and Defendants 

FRANK PROANO, HAROLD BONE, DAVID MULLANY, DIANE PICCOLO and 

The CITY OF CHICAGO, by their attorney Jill Russell, Assistant Corporation Counsel, 

hereby request that this Court enter an order reflecting their agreement to settle Plaintiff’s 

petition for appellate attorneys’ fees. In support of this motion, the parties state as follows: 

1. Plaintiff filed a petition for appellate attorneys’ fees pursuant to Section 1988 on 

March 18, 2015. This petition is still pending before this Court.

2. The parties have reached an agreement to settle the appellate fees in the amount of 

$40,000.00 (FORTY-THOUSAND Dollars). 

3. Thus, the parties request that this Court enter an order granting attorneys’ fees for 

the appeal entitled Morjal v. City of Chicago, 14-1365. The parties have agreed upon the Order 

attached as Exhibit A for this purpose. 

WHEREFORE, the parties jointly request that this Court award attorneys’ fees to 

Plaintiff’s counsel in the amount agreed upon by the parties and enter an order granting 

those fees. 

Respectfully Submitted,
/s Torreya L. Hamilton /s Jill Russell

One of Plaintiff’s Attorneys Attorney for Defendants

Torreya L. Hamilton Jill Russell

Kevin T. Turkcan, of counsel Assistant Corporation Counsel

HAMILTON LAW OFFICE, LLC City of Chicago, Department of Law

53 West Jackson Boulevard, Suite 452 30 North LaSalle Street, Suite 900

Chicago, Illinois 60604 Chicago, Illinois 60602

312.726.3173 312.742.7030