alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
MEMORANDUM

TO: Addressees

 

FROM: The Secretary

SUBJECT: Delegation of Authority

I. DELEGATION

Under the authority vested in me by section 412 of the Department of Education 

Organization Act, 20 U.S.C. §3472, I hereby delegated to you, and to anyone 

serving for you in an acting capacity, for your respective Principal Office, the 

authority under 5 U.S.C. Section 3595(b)(3)(B), to file written objections to the 

Office of Personnel Management, when appropriate, based on your determination 

that the career Senior Executive Service employees referred failed to meet the 

technical qualifications for applicable position vacancies.

Unless otherwise noted in future delegations of authority, legislative amendments to 

the authorities delegated herein are included in the scope of this delegation.

II. RESERVATIONS

None.

III. REDELEGATION

This authority may not be redelegated.

IV. CERTIFICATION AND EFFECTIVE DATE

This delegation is effective upon certification by the Department’s Principal 

Delegations Control Officer and supersedes all previous delegation of this authority.

___________(Signed)___________ 

Richard W. Riley

OGC Clearance and Date: /s/ R. Wexler, 7/12/96

Certification Date: 7/31/96

Certified by Departmental Delegations Control Officer: /s/ Naty Beetle 

 

Control Number: EA/EG/79
Addressees and PO Control No.

EA/EB/137 – Deputy Secretary

EA/EC/185 – Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights

EA/EE/16 – Under Secretary

EA/EF/83 – Inspector General

EA/EG/79 – General Counsel

EA/EH/69 – Assistant Secretary for Special Education and Rehabilitative Services

EA/EJ/28 - Assistant Secretary for Legislation and Congressional Affairs

EA/EK/86 - Assistant Secretary for Intergovernmental and Interagency Affairs

EA/EL/62 – Chief Financial Officer

EA/EP/244 - Assistant Secretary for Postsecondary Education

EA/ES/54- Assistant Secretary for Elementary and Secondary Education

EA/EV/58 - Assistant Secretary for Vocational and Adult Education

EA/EI/2 - Chief Information Officer

EA/EN/2 - Chief Operating Officer, Federal Student Aid

EA/EQ/2 - Deputy Under Secretary for Safe and Drug-Free Schools

EA/ER/1 - Director, Institute of Education Sciences

EA/EU/2 - Deputy Under Secretary for Innovation and Improvement
#### In the Matter of Eileen Consilvio, as Executive Director of Manhattan Psychiatric Center, Appellant, v Harold N., Respondent.

[834 NYS2d 117]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Phyllis GangelJacob, J.), entered July 11, 2006, which, after a hearing pursuant to Mental Hygiene Law § 9.31, directed respondent’s release from Manhattan Psychiatric Center (MPC), unanimously affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Two of the three psychiatrists agreed that respondent was *296mentally ill, but differed as to his diagnosis.* One of them conceded some question as to whether respondent had exhibited a conduct disorder prior to age 15 (a criterion necessary under the DSM-IV—the latest edition of the American Psychiatric Association’s Diagnostic and Statistic Manual of Mental Disorders—for diagnosing antisocial personality disorder), and instead based his diagnosis on respondent’s “spectrum” of behavior (a term not included in the DSM-IV). The other two psychiatrists did not refer to this “spectrum.” Thus, regardless of the precise diagnosis, petitioner did not submit clear and convincing evidence that respondent suffered from a mental illness.

Petitioner further failed to demonstrate by clear and convincing evidence that inpatient treatment was essential to respondent’s welfare, and that his judgment was so impaired that he was unable to understand the need for such care and treatment *(see*Mental Hygiene Law § 9.01). Nor did petitioner demonstrate that respondent posed a substantial risk of physical harm to himself or others *(see Matter of Gilliard v Sanchez,*219 AD2d 500 [1995]). Respondent had numerous arrests and convictions for prostitution-related crimes more than a decade ago, but he committed no misconduct while in prison, and his behavior during incarceration over the past 10 years demonstrates no signs of violence or threat toward others. Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Friedman, Sullivan, Williams and Gonzalez, JJ.

*

 Respondent’s brief states that he originally petitioned for a writ of habeas corpus challenging the legality of his initial transfer to MFC and that the petition was dismissed as moot in light of Justice Gangel-Jacob’s order directing his release. He notes that “the circumstances that originally brought [him] to MFC are not at issue in this appeal,” and that the “present application relates solely to MFC’s application pursuant [to] Section 9.33 of the Mental Hygiene Law to involuntarily retain [him] as a patient” *(compare State of N.Y. ex rel. Harkavy v Consilvio,*7 NY3d 607 [2006]).
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Indian Affairs

          - [212A2100DD/AAKC001030/A0A501010.999900253G]

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice publishes the approval of the Second Amendment to the Tribal-State Compact for Class III Gaming between the Cowlitz Indian Tribe (Tribe) and the State of Washington (State).

      ( print page 2449)    

# DATES:

The compact takes effect on January 12, 2021.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. Paula L. Hart, Director, Office of Indian Gaming, Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary—Policy and Economic Development, Washington, DC 20240, (202) 219-4066.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Under section 11 of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (IGRA), Public Law 100-497, 25 U.S.C. 2701*et seq.,*                     the Secretary of the Interior shall publish in the                     **Federal Register**                     notice of approved Tribal-State compacts for the purpose of engaging in Class III gaming activities on Indian lands. As required by 25 CFR 293.4, all compacts and amendments are subject to review and approval by the Secretary. The Compact increases the number of player terminals the Tribe may operate, increases the Tribe's contribution to combat problem gambling, permits the Tribe's gaming facilities to accept additional forms of payment, designates the Cowlitz Tribal Court as a jurisdictional forum for certain purposes, adopts certain state law provisions related to gaming regulation, and adopts rules governing wide area progressives. The Compact is approved.                

Tara Sweeney,

Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs.

[FR Doc. 2021-00340 Filed 1-11-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4337-15-P
-81 -80 -79 -78 -77 -76 -75

38 39 40 41



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 1000 18 12 06 00 07/19 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 19 Jul 06

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.48 N 77.37 WMeters AGL
### §5814. Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated to carry out this part $40,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2013 through 2023. Of amounts appropriated to carry out this part for a fiscal year, not less than $15,000,000, or not less than two thirds of any such appropriation, whichever is greater, shall be used to carry out sections 5811 and 5812 of this title.

(Pub. L. 101–624, title XVI, §1624, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 3739; Pub. L. 102–237, title IV, §408, Dec. 13, 1991, 105 Stat. 1865; Pub. L. 113–79, title VII, §7201, Feb. 7, 2014, 128 Stat. 880; Pub. L. 115–334, title VII, §7201, Dec. 20, 2018, 132 Stat. 4803.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–334 substituted "2023" for "2018".

2014—Pub. L. 113–79, in first sentence, struck out "$40,000,000 for each fiscal year" after "appropriated" and inserted "$40,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2013 through 2018" after "part".

1991—Pub. L. 102–237 substituted "and 5812" for "and 5813".
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 70 

To designate the mountain at the Devils Tower National Monument, 

Wyoming, as Devils Tower, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 9, 2017 

Mr. ENZI (for himself and Mr. BARRASSO) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural 

Resources 

A BILL 

To designate the mountain at the Devils Tower National 

Monument, Wyoming, as Devils Tower, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF DEVILS TOWER. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—The mountain at the Devils 

5 Tower National Monument, Wyoming, located at 

6 44°35′26′′N, by 104°42′55′′W, and the area located at 

7 44°35′21′′N, by 104°41′48′′W, shall be known and des8 ignated as ‘‘Devils Tower’’. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 70 IS

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in any law, map, 

2 regulation, order, document, paper, or other record of the 

3 United States to the mountain and area described in sub4 section (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to ‘‘Devils 

5 Tower’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
B.S. M.P. N°-109

\

too

U5T

m.p. ioq

copy |


Bureau of Standards

SEP 1 2 1930

1,2 I 34
©OZzoH 8 5 2

aso

ft* < D

toDO

IdZ<J

i—I

IdUC/5 ZuV

inuuNX

oi

UJoooHZ

UIh<

0-Q

CO

toQ<QZ<

CO

g

O CQ < o

UI DC jy O D

CQ

COQ<

UJx

anu

COO

CO

UJa<

UJ

UJXHaZ a

on

UJH

UJQOH

Dm<Xu

to o ©1 5 < s I—< . Q &

£s

on < a s 2 H 3 CO5z £ 2 o Z x o

co

H

w

-J

CQ

S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

R. P. LAMONT. Secretary BUREAU OF STANDARDS

GEORGE K. BURGESS, Director

MISCELLANEOUS PUBLICATION No

ISSUED MARCH 7, 1930 PRICE, 5 CENTS

CHART FOR DETERMINING THE HELIX ANGLES OF SCREW THREADS

SHOWING HELIX ANGLES FOR DIAMETERS FROM 0.05 TO 10 INCHES AND THREADS PER INCH FROM 1 TO 100

By I. H. FULLMER

This chart shows graphically the relationships among diameters, leads, and helix angles of

screw threads or other helical surfaces. It is a means (or readily deterrnining the helix angle

at the major, pitch, or minor diameters of any of the standard pitches of the American National

coarse, fine, hose coupling, pipe, and Acme threads as given in the 1926 Report of the National Screw Thread Commission. Usually, however, it is the helix angle corresponding to the pitch diameter which it is desirable to know. The range of the chart includes diameters from 0.05 to 10 inches and 1 to 100 threads per

inch. Diameters are represented by a vertical logarithmic Kale, designated on each side of the

chart, and leads (or pitches of single-thread screws) on a horizontal logarithmic scale along the

top. For convenient use of the chart, vertical lines are drawn corresponding to the threads per

inch of the various standard systems and these are designated along the bottom of the chart. The abscissa for a nonstandard pitch can be readily determined by interpolation on the lead

scale and transferred to the diameter ordinate by means of a pair of dividers. The diagonal

lines of the chart represent helix angles as designated. Example.—To determine the helix angle at the pitch line of a M*_20, 60° screw thread: The basic pitch diameter is 0.4675". Reading opposite 0.468 on the diameter scale on the vertical line corresponding to 20 turns per inch, the diagonal line immediately below is 2° 0' and

interpolation gives the helix angle as 1° 57'.

There may be occasions, as in designing power transmission or conveying screws, when the

helix angle would first be selected and a suitable corresponding combination of diameter and lead

or pitch determined.

Interesting comparisons of various standard screw-thread systems can also be made by

plotting them on this chart.

AO JO moo

60 72 64 56 46 4440 J6 i2 26 24 20 16 16 1413 12 II 10 9 TURNS PER INCH

CHART FOR DETERMINING HELIX ANGLES OF SCREW THREADS

HELIX ANCLES



I
Exhibit 10.2
------------

                              FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
April 4, 2006

                             TRANSBOTICS CORPORATION
              ANNOUNCES SIGNIFICANT INCREASE IN BANK LINE OF CREDIT


         Charlotte, NC, April 4, 2006, Transbotics Corporation (OTC Bulletin
Board Symbol "TNSB.OB") www.transbotics.com announced that it has entered into a
new revolving line of credit with Wachovia Bank, NA that increased it borrowing
capacity from $400,000 to $750,000. The principal terms of the Promissory Note
are as follows:

          1.   The maximum available loan amount is $750,000
          2.   The line is secured by assets of the Corporation
          3.   The interest rate is prime
          4.   The loan is a demand note which is reviewed annually

Management is pleased with the agreement terms, which it announced are adequate
for the Company's current financing needs. Claude Imbleau, the company's
president said, "This increase is a good match for the Company's current growth
objectives and liquidity needs. We look forward to a continued, positive
relationship with Wachovia."

For over 20 years Transbotics Corporation has specialized in the design,
development, support and installation of automation solutions with an emphasis
on Automatic Guided Vehicles (AGVs). The Company is an automation solutions
integrator that manufactures, integrate, installs and supports various
automation technologies including: AGVs, robots, end of arm tooling, vision
systems, batteries, chargers, motors and other related products.

Transbotics provides unique automation solutions to a variety of industries,
including automotive (tier one supplier), food and beverage, paper and allied
products and publishing, entertainment, plastics and primary metals.
Transbotics' current customers include Fortune 500 companies as well as small
manufacturing companies.

This release (including information incorporated by reference herein) may be
deemed to contain certain forward-looking statements with respect to the
financial condition, results of operation, plans, objectives, future performance
and business of the Company. These forward-looking statements involve certain
risk, including, without limitation, the uncertainties detailed in Transbotics
Corporation Securities and Exchange Commission filings.

                                       ###

================================================================================
For further information contact:

Claude Imbleau
CEO & President
704/362-1115



                                       21
1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

In re Innovatio IP Ventures, LLC, Patent 

Litigation 

 Case No. 1:11-cv-09308 

Judge James F. Holderman 

Magistrate Judge Sidney Schenkier This Document Relates To: 

1:12-cv-00431 (originally 3:11-cv-00644 

(W.D. Wis.)) 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 

 On this day, Innovatio IP Ventures, LLC, Innovatio Management, LLC 

and Noel B. Whitley (collectively, “Innovatio”) and Courtyard La Crosse 

Downtown/Mississippi Riverfront, Fairfield Inn & Suites Beloit, Fairfield Inn & Suites 

Stevens Point, Madison High Crossing Lodging Investors II, LLC (including the 

originally-sued entity Fairfield Inn & Suites Madison East), Middleton Discovery Springs 

Lodging Investors, LLC (including the originally-sued entity Courtyard Madison 

West/Middleton), and Residence Inn Madison East (collectively “Defendants”) 

announced to the Court that they have settled their respective claims for relief asserted in 

the above-captioned actions. The Court, having considered this request, is of the opinion 

that their request for dismissal should be GRANTED. 

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that all claims and counterclaims by Innovatio 

against Defendants and by Defendants against Innovatio in the above-captioned actions, 

including Case Nos. 1:11-cv-09308 (consolidated) and 1:12-cv-00431 (originally 3:11-

cv-00644 (W.D. Wis.)), are dismissed, with prejudice to the re-filing of same. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all attorneys’ fees, costs of court and expenses 

shall be borne by the party incurring the same. 
2 

This is a final judgment as to the parties herein. Because there are no remaining 

claims in Case No. 12-cv-00431, the Court closes this case in its entirety. 

5/29/14 

_________________________________ 

James F. Holderman 

United States District Judge
================================================================================

                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

                           ---------------------------

                                   FORM 10-Q/A

           (X) QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
                         SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


                FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000

                                     - OR -

          ( ) TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
                         SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                           ---------------------------

                          Commission File Number 1-3183

                                 TXU GAS COMPANY


A Texas Corporation                               I.R.S. Employer Identification
                                                         No. 75-0399066


            ENERGY PLAZA, 1601 BRYAN STREET, DALLAS, TEXAS 75201-3411
                                 (214) 812-4600

                           ---------------------------

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes  X  No
                                        ---    ---

COMMON STOCK OUTSTANDING AT NOVEMBER 10, 2000: 451,000 shares, par value $0.01
per share.


================================================================================


<PAGE>


                                   SIGNATURES

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

                                        TXU GAS COMPANY


                                        By   /s/ Jerry W. Pinkerton
                                          -------------------------------------
                                                  Jerry W. Pinkerton
                                                    Vice President,
                                              Principal Accounting Officer


                                        By   /s/ Gaylene M. McMahon
                                          -------------------------------------
                                                  Gaylene M. McMahon
                                                     Controller

Date:  November 15, 2000


<PAGE>


                                  EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit        Description
-------        -----------

15             Letter from independent accountants as to unaudited interim
               financial information
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1


                          SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY


Following is a list of the Company's subsidiaries:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                        Organized           Percent of
                                        Under               Voting Securities
Name                                    the Laws of         Owned by Registrant
----                                    -----------         -------------------
<S>                                     <C>                 <C>

Intelect Network Technologies Company   Nevada              100%
Intelect Communications Systems Ltd.    Beruda              100%
Intelect Network Systems Limited        England             100%
Intelect Visual Communications Corp.    Delaware            100%
DNA Enterprises, Inc.                   Texas               100%
</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of the Final Accounting of Morgan Guaranty Trust Company of New York, Respondent, as Sole Surviving Trustee of the Trust Created for the Benefit of Isabelle Taintor under the Will of Charles N. Taintor, Deceased. John D. Mason, Appellant.

Decree unanimously affirmed, with costs to respondent payable out of the estate. No opinion. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Valente, Stevens and Steuer, JJ.
### §7754. Regulations and orders

The Secretary may issue such regulations and orders as the Secretary considers necessary to carry out this chapter.

(Pub. L. 106–224, title IV, §434, June 20, 2000, 114 Stat. 453.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this title", meaning title IV of Pub. L. 106–224, June 20, 2000, 114 Stat. 438, known as the Plant Protection Act, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of title IV to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 7701 of this title and Tables.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of functions of the Secretary of Agriculture relating to agricultural import and entry inspection activities under this chapter to the Secretary of Homeland Security, and for treatment of related references, see sections 231, 551(d), 552(d), and 557 of Title 6, Domestic Security, and the Department of Homeland Security Reorganization Plan of November 25, 2002, as modified, set out as a note under section 542 of Title 6.