alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Federal Reporter or U.S.App.D.C. Reports. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of any formal errors in order that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press. 

# United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

–———— Filed October 28, 2003
No. 01–5387

B RETT C. K IMBERLIN AND D ARRELL R ICE, APPELLANTS

v. U NITED S TATES D EPARTMENT OF J USTICE AND B UREAU OF P RISONS, APPELLEES

–———— Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (No. 97cv02633)

–———— On Appellants’ Petition for Rehearing

–———— Before: S ENTELLE , H ENDERSON , and T ATEL ,* Circuit Judges

. O R D E R Upon consideration of the appellants’ petition for panelrehearing, filed on March 28, 2003, and the appellees’ response thereto, it isORDERED that the petition be denied. Our panel disposition of this case remains unchanged after the United States Supreme Court’s opinion in Overton v. Bazzetta , 123 S. Ct. * Judge Tatel would grant the petition for panel rehearing.2 2162 (2003). To the extent that Overtonmay affect ourdetermination that we ‘‘need not invoke the four factor analysis the United States Supreme Court established in Turner v. Safley , 482 U.S. 78, 89, 107 S.Ct. 2254, 2261–62, 96 L.Ed.2d 64 (1987),’’ Kimberlin v. United States Dep’t of Justice , 318 F.3d 228, 232 (D.C. Cir. 2003), our alternative disposition, that the prison regulations banning electric and electronic musical instruments satisfy Safley ’s test, remains intact, see id . at 233–34. Per Curiam For the Court: Mark J. Langer Clerk
§ 61.25 Purpose. ( a ) This part is composed of several subparts, each containing its own purpose. This subpart implements policy, assigns responsibilities, and provides procedures for addressing child abuse and domestic abuse in military communities.
( b ) Restricted reporting guidelines are provided in DoD Instruction 6400.06, “Domestic Abuse Involving DoD Military and Certain Affiliated Personnel” (available at *http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/corres/pdf/640006p.pdf*). This subpart prescribes guidelines for Family Advocacy Program (FAP) assessment, clinical rehabilitative treatment, and ongoing monitoring of individuals who have been reported to FAP by means of an unrestricted report for domestic abuse against: ( 1 ) Current or former spouses, or
( 2 ) Intimate partners.
|   | · | The                Covered Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)                or                15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;                and                    |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                     |
|   | · | The                information contained in the Covered Report fairly presents, in all                material respects, the financial condition and results of operations                of                the Company. |

| Date:                February 28, 2007 | /s/ Paul                A.                Farr                                   Paul                A. FarrSenior                Vice PresidentPPL                Energy Supply, LLC |
|----------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
#### 1352.228-74 Fair market value of aircraft.

As prescribed in 48 CFR 1328.310-70(e) and 48 CFR 1328.310-70(g) insert the following in all applicable contracts for leased aircraft:

# Fair Market Value of Aircraft (APR 2010)

For purposes of the clause entitled “Loss of or Damage to Leased Aircraft,” it is agreed that the fair market value of the aircraft to be used in the performance of this contract shall be the lesser of the two values set out in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this clause:

(a) $________; or

(b) If the contractor has insured the same aircraft against loss or destruction in connection with other operations, the amount of such insurance coverage on the date of the loss or damage is the maximum amount for which the Government may be responsible under this contract.

(End of clause)

[75 FR 10570, Mar. 8, 2010; 75 FR 14496, Mar. 26, 2010]
1

CASCINO VAUGHAN LAW OFFICES, LTD

By CM/ECF system

July 13, 2016

Judge Virginia M. Kendall

Everett McKinley Dirksen United States Courthouse, Chambers 2378

219 South Dearborn Street

Chicago, IL 60604

Re: Pehlke v. CBS Corp. Case Number 12-cv-596, Daubert Hearing Schedule

Dear Judge Kendall:

I write to inform of the new scheduling arrangement worked out by the parties based on 

updated information the Court provided at the status last week about the days of August 2 and 3, 

2016, now being available. The four Daubert witnesses were originally scheduled on August 1 

and September 1. 

The parties now propose the hearing begin at 10 AM on August 2 and August 3. On 

August 2, Plaintiffs’ experts James Huttner followed by Samuel Wineman will testify. On 

August 3, Ray McMullen (CBS witness) will be the witness called. Plaintiff was not able to 

reschedule Ken Garza for August 2 or 3. He will testify on the date for which he was already 

scheduled of September 1 beginning at 10:00 am.

Please advise if this scheduling is not convenient for the Court. 

Sincerely, 

/ Daniel Hausman/ 

Daniel Hausman

Attorney for Plaintiff

220 SOUTH ASHLAND

CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 

60607-5308

312-944-0600

MICHAEL P. CASCINO (IL) 

ALLEN D. VAUGHAN (IL)

ROBERT G. McCOY (WI, IL) 

DANIEL B. HAUSMAN (IL)

Case: 1:12-cv-00596 Document #: 73 Filed: 07/13/16 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:1158
2

Certificate of Service

I hereby certify that on July 13, 2016 I caused the forgoing to be electronically filed with 

the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois using the CM/ECF system 

which automatically sends all necessary notifications of this filing to CM/ECF participants in 

this case.

/s/ Daniel Hausman 

Attorney for Plaintiff

Daniel Hausman

Cascino Vaughan Law Offices, Ltd.

220 South Ashland Ave.

Chicago, IL 60607

(312) 944-0600

(312) 944-1870 (fax)

dhausman@cvlo.com

Case: 1:12-cv-00596 Document #: 73 Filed: 07/13/16 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:1159
EXHIBIT 10(o)(x)

                                    AMENDMENT

     This Agreement  amends the First Amended  Executive  Exmployment  Agreement
between the  Employee and UST Corp.  dated as of the 1st day of  February,  1996
(the "Employment Agreement"). All capitalized terms used in this Agreement shall
have the meaning  ascribed to them in the Employment  Agreement unless otherwise
expressly provided herein.

1.      Section  6.d.i and Section 6.e of the  Employment  Agreement  are hereby
        amended to provide that, in addition to base salary payable  thereunder,
        the  Employee  shall be paid an  amount  equal to the  bonus  which  the
        Employee  earned for  performance  during the calendar year  immediately
        preceding the year in which termination occurs.

2.      Section  6.g.i(1)  of the  Employment  Agreement  is hereby  amended  to
        provide  that,  in  addition  to base  salary  payable  thereunder,  the
        Employee  shall be paid an amount equal to two (2) times the bonus which
        the Employee earned for performance during the calendar year immediately
        preceding the year in which termination occurs.

3.      Except as expressly modified herein, the Employment  Agreement,  and all
        of its terms and provisions, shall remain in full force and effect.

     Intending to be legally bound, the parties have signed this Agreement as of
the 17th day of December, 1996.

UST CORP:
By: s/
      ------------------------------
           Neal F. Finnegan
Title: President and Chief Executive Officer

EMPLOYEE:

s/
 -----------------------------------
Employee

UST Corp.
40 Court Street. Boston. Massachusetts 02108
(617) 726-7000 Telex 951494 UST BSN
§ 776.67 Judicial and legal officers. ( a ) A covered attorney shall not make a statement that the covered attorney knows to be false or with reckless disregard as to its truth or falsity concerning the qualifications or integrity of a judge, investigating officer, hearing officer, adjudicatory officer, or public legal officer, or of a candidate for election or appointment to judicial or legal office.
( b ) [Reserved]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
Provident Financial Group, Inc.'s 10-K/A for December 31, 1997 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         208,097
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                70,650
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  1,028,207
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                      5,311,448
<ALLOWANCE>                                     66,693
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,824,388
<DEPOSITS>                                   4,596,480
<SHORT-TERM>                                   599,540
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            263,684
<LONG-TERM>                                    850,934
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      7,000
<COMMON>                                        11,973
<OTHER-SE>                                     494,777
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               6,824,388
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                451,805
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               67,579
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   941
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               520,325
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             192,939
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             280,257
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          240,068
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   47,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  96
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                175,162
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                119,343
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      78,145
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    78,145
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.96
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.87
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.96
<LOANS-NON>                                     21,116
<LOANS-PAST>                                    18,751
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   786
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                 37,627
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                60,235
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   46,809
<RECOVERIES>                                     4,894
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               66,693
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            66,693
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE 

CAROL J . HOLAHAN 

DIRECTOR 

OFFICE Op LEGISLATIVE SERVICES 

STATE HOUSE 

107 NORTH MAIN STREET, ROOM 109 

CONCORD, NEW HAMPSHIRE 03301-4951 

. November 19, 2004 

NOTICE NO. 2004-123 

RULE # Env-A 2700 

RELATIVE TO: Hot Mix Asphalt Plants 

The Joint Legislative Committee on Administrative Rules has reviewed the Final Proposal on the 

above cited rule at its meeting on NOVEMBER 19 2004 

The Committee voted to approve the rule. You may proceed to adopt the rule and file it with the 

Division of Administrative Rules of the Office of Legislative Services . When filing the final rule, the agency 

is also .required to file a cover letter indicating the date of final adoption and certifying the final rule is a true 

copy. See Section 2.19 of Chapter 3 in the N.H. Drafting and Procedure Manual for Administrative Rules. 

The rule will become effective either at (1) 12:01 a.m. on the day after the filing, (2) 12 :01 a.m. on the date 

specified in the-cover letter,to me when the rule is filed, or ~(3) such other date and time as specified in the 

cover letter, provided that the filing occurs before such effective date and time. Please send two (2) copies of 

the adopted rule. . 

Sincerely yours, 

C---e- 1 t.~ 

Carol J. Holahan, Director 

Office of Legislative Services 

CJHllms 

Enc. 

ADMINISTRATION (603) 271-3436 

DIRECTOR . (603) 271-3432 TDD Access: Relay NH 1-800-735-2964 LEGAL STAFF (603) 271-3435. 

ADMINISTRATIVE RULES (603) 271-3680 FAX: (603) 271-6607 . RESEARCH (603) 271-3326
#### George E. Brunstad *v.*Donna L. F. Brunstad

*Vincent S. Tiróla*and *Lila Chamdng,*for the appellee (defendant).

No appearance for the appellant (plaintiff).

Argued February 4

decided February 4, 1975

The defendant’s motion to dismiss the appeal from the Superior Court in Fairfield County is granted.
### §6708. Repealed. Pub. L. 115–334, title VIII, §8301(a), Dec. 20, 2018, 132 Stat. 4840

Section, Pub. L. 101–624, title XXIV, §2410, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 4061, related to biomass energy demonstration projects.
EXHIBIT 11


                                CLX ENERGY, INC.
                   Computation of Net Income (Loss) Per Share

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                 Year ended
                                               September 30,
                                               --------------

                                             2000          1999
                                       --------------  -----------
<S>                                    <C>             <C>
Net income (loss)                      $    210,558    (   64,486)

Preferred stock dividends                       -      (    2,747)
                                         ----------     ---------

Net income (loss) applicable to
  common shareholders                  $    210,558    (   67,233)
                                         ==========     =========

Weighted average number of common
  shares outstanding                     10,548,124     8,296,085

Common equivalent shares
  representing shares issuable
  upon exercise of outstanding
  options                                   214,286           -
                                         ----------     ---------

                                         10,762,410     8,296,085
                                         ==========     =========

 Net income (loss) per share
  applicable to common shareholders:
    Basic                              $       0.02    (     0.01)
                                         ==========     =========

    Diluted                            $       0.02    (     0.01)
                                         ==========     =========

</TABLE>

Stock options are not considered in the calculations for those periods with net
losses as the impact of the potential common shares (500,000 shares at September
30, 1999) would be to decrease net loss per share.
















                                       39

<PAGE>
§ 770.30 Violations. ( a ) Any person entering or remaining on a naval installation in the State of Hawaii, without consent of the commander or his authorized representative, shall be subject to the penalties of a fine of not more than $500 or imprisonment for not more than six months, or both. See 18 U.S.C. 1382.
( b ) Moreover, any person who willfully violates this regulation is subject to a fine not to exceed $5,000 or imprisonment for one year, or both. See 50 U.S.C. 797.
#### § 37.1240 Basic research.

Efforts directed toward increasing knowledge and understanding in science and engineering, rather than the practical application of that knowledge and understanding. It typically is funded within Research, Development, Test and Evaluation programs in Budget Activity 1, Basic Research (also known informally as research category 6.1).
#### 1301.603 Selection, appointment, and termination of appointment.
Exhibit 99.2


                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection with the Quarterly Report of Ennis Business Forms,
Inc.  (the  "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending  August
31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission  on
the  date  hereof  (the "Report"), I, Robert  M.  Halowec,  Chief
Financial  Officer  of  the  Company,  certify,  pursuant  to  18
U.S.C.1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley  Act
of 2002, that:

  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of  section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

  (2) The information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,
      in  all  material  respects, the  financial  condition  and
      result of operations of the Company.


/s/ Robert M. Halowec

Robert M. Halowec
Chief Financial Officer
October 14, 2002
# 17action 

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION FISCAL YEAR 2017 OMB REQUEST&11(in thousands of dollars)	August 17, 2015, 10:16 AM

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION FISCAL YEAR 2017 OMB REQUEST&11(in thousands of dollars)	July 16, 2015 10:56 am

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION FISCAL YEAR 2017 OMB REQUEST&11(in thousands of dollars)	August 7, 2015, 6:40 AM

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION FISCAL YEAR 2017 OMB REQUEST&11(in thousands of dollars)	September 3, 2015, 3:56 PM

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION FISCAL YEAR 2017 CONGRESSIONAL ACTION&11(dollars in thousands)	July 17, 2017 

&20 	&P

&20 	&P

&20 	&P

&20 	&P

&20 	&P

# 2017 OMB Request_Div Directors

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION FISCAL YEAR 2017 OMB REQUEST&11(in thousands of dollars)	July 16, 2015 10:56 am

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION FISCAL YEAR 2017 OMB REQUEST&11(in thousands of dollars)	July 16, 2015 10:56 am

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION FISCAL YEAR 2017 OMB REQUEST&11(in thousands of dollars)	July 16, 2015 10:56 am

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION FISCAL YEAR 2017 OMB REQUEST&11(in thousands of dollars)	July 16, 2015 10:56 am

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION FISCAL YEAR 2017 OMB REQUEST&11(in thousands of dollars)	July 16, 2015 10:56 am

&20 	&P

&20 	&P

&20 	&P

&20 	&P

&20 	&P

# 2017 OMB REQUEST_OriginalMaster

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION FISCAL YEAR 2017 OMB REQUEST&11(in thousands of dollars)	July 16, 2015 10:56 am

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION FISCAL YEAR 2017 OMB REQUEST&11(in thousands of dollars)	July 16, 2015 10:56 am

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION FISCAL YEAR 2017 OMB REQUEST&11(in thousands of dollars)	July 16, 2015 10:56 am

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION FISCAL YEAR 2017 OMB REQUEST&11(in thousands of dollars)	July 16, 2015 10:56 am

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION FISCAL YEAR 2017 OMB REQUEST&11(in thousands of dollars)	July 16, 2015 10:56 am

&20 	&P

&20 	&P

&20 	&P

&20 	&P

&20 	&P
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2 CERTIFICATE OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
section 1350): I, Gregory J. Fisher, Chief Financial Officer of ElkCorp, certify to my
knowledge and belief pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18
U.S.C. section 1350) that:  (1)
    
    The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March
31, 2004, which this statement accompanies, fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and  (2)
    
    The information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
for the period ended March 31, 2004 fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
ElkCorp. Dated: May 14, 2004 By /s/ Gregory J. FisherGregory J. FisherChief Financial Officer
#### Albert F. Lehmann, Respondent, v. Johnson, Drake & Piper of Vietnam, Inc., Appellant.

The action was commenced in 1960 and involves transactions occurring in 1957 and 1958. Plaintiff-respondent’s attorney advances no reason for his failure to move to vacate the order of preclusion until May 23, 1962, which was eight months after he learned of it and seven months after his substitution. (Of. *Paris*v. *Potieha,*1 A D 2d 277.) We note, parenthetically, that appellant perfected this appeal on February 2, 1963, that the case was upon the calendars of the March, May and September 1963 Terms and is now disposed of after a second substitution of attorneys, and after notification by the attorney last substituted that he will neither file a brief nor argue. Order vacating order of preclusion reversed and motion denied, without costs. Bergan, P. J., Gibson, Herlihy and Reynolds, JJ., concur.
1301.105-2 Arrangement of regulations. ( a ) *General.* The CAR is divided into the same parts, subparts, sections, and subsections as the FAR.
( b ) *Numbering.* If the DOC does not have supplemental regulations there will be no corresponding coverage in the CAR, and there will be gaps in the CAR numbering system.
#### Thelma Ramsey, by Her Guardian ad Litem, Willis Ramsey, et al., Respondents, v. Ruth Decker et al., Appellants.

In an action to recover dam*655ages for personal injuries, defendants appeal: (1) from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, dated and entered June 17, 1960, after a jury trial, upon the jury’s verdict of $25,000 in favor of the infant plaintiff and $3,000 in favor of the adult plaintiff, the infant’s father; and (2) from an order of the same court, dated June 10, 1960, and entered June 21, 1960, denying defendants’ motion to set aside the verdict and for a new trial. Judgment and order affirmed, with one bill of costs. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Ughetta, Kleinfeld and Christ, JJ., concur,
SECOND AMENDMENT TO LICENSE AGREEMENT

     This Second  Amendment  to License  Agreement  ("Second  Amendment")  dated
effective  as of August 1, 2002,  is made by and  between  Emerson  Radio  Corp.
("Licensor") and Funai Corporation, Inc. ("Licensee").

     WHEREAS,  Licensor  and  Licensee  are  parties to that  License  Agreement
("Agreement")  effective as of January 1, 2001, as amended by First Amendment to
License Agreement, dated February 19, 2002; and

     WHEREAS,  the parties wish to further amend the  Agreement  effective as of
the effective  date of this Second  Amendment to reflect a revised  royalty rate
for sales to Walmart only.

     NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree to the following:

     1.   Capitalized  Terms and Amended  Exhibit A. All  capitalized  terms not
          defined  herein  shall  have the  same  meaning  as in the  Agreement.
          Exhibit A, Section III. of the  Agreement  shall be amended to read as
          set forth on the attached Amended Exhibit A.

     2.   All Other  Provisions of the  Agreement.  All other  provisions of the
          Agreement not amended  herein shall  continue to have their full force
          and effect.

     IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  this Second  Amendment  has been executed by the duly
authorized  representative  of each party  effective  as of the above  effective
date.

          EMERSON RADIO CORP.                FUNAI CORPORATION, INC.


          By:   /s/ John J. Raab             By:  /s/ Masao Suwa
          Name:  John J. Raab                Name:  Masao Suwa
          Title: EVP - International         Title:  President
#### 1335.016 Broad agency announcement.