alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 99

                       TXU GAS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
                  CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED INCOME
                                  (Unaudited)


                                                            Twelve Months Ended
                                                                  March 31,
                                                            -------------------
                                                             2001         2000
                                                            ------       ------
                                                            Millions of Dollars

Operating revenues............................              $8,131       $4,089
                                                            ------       ------
 Operating expenses
  Energy purchased for resale.................               7,603        3,540
  Operation and maintenance...................                 337          358
  Depreciation and other amortization.........                  62           64
  Goodwill amortization.......................                  22           21
  Taxes other than income.....................                  74           59
                                                            ------       ------
    Total operating expenses..................               8,098        4,042
                                                            ------       ------

Operating income..............................                  33           47

Other income (deductions) - net...............                  62           17
                                                            ------       ------

Income before interest, other charges and                       95           64
 income taxes.................................

Interest income...............................                  11            1

Interest expense and other charges............                 (87)         (75)
                                                            ------       ------

Income (loss) before income taxes.............                  19          (10)

Income tax expense (benefit)..................                  13           (6)
                                                            ------       ------

Net income (loss).............................                   6           (4)

Preferred stock dividends.....................                   4            4
                                                            ------       ------

Net income (loss) applicable to common stock..              $    2       $   (8)
                                                            ======       ======
<PAGE>
 
                                  EXHIBIT 21

                   GAMMA BIOLOGICALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                        SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT
 
 
                                          State or Country
                                              in which           Percent
                                            Incorporated          Owned
                                          ----------------  -----------------
Registrant:
 Gamma Biologicals, Inc. ...............        Texas         Not Applicable
Subsidiaries of the Registrant(A):
 Delta Diagnostics, Inc. ...............        Texas               100%
 Gamma Biologicals International, Inc. .    United States
                                            Virgin Islands          100%
 Gamma Biologicals, B.V. ...............    The Netherlands         100%

____________
Note A  All of the subsidiaries are included in the consolidated financial
statements of the Registrant.
To:      Dave Alcala

From:    Michael Burstein

Date:    January 5, 2000

Re:      Obligations Met

This memo is to confirm that by accepting and depositing the enclosed check,
David Alcala hereby agrees that EXE Technologies, Inc. has met all of its
financial obligations and commitments to Mr. Alcala from the date of employment
through December 31, 1999.

EXE also hereby confirms that Mr. Alcala does not have any outstanding
obligations to EXE for the same period.

Dave, please sign in the space provided below and return one copy to me for our
files.

By: /s/ David Alcala                         By: /s/ Michael Burstein
    ------------------------------               ------------------------------
      David Alcala                                 Michael Burstein
                                                   Chief Financial Officer

*Signed subject to pending life insurance policy to be issued. All base
compensation, commission, and bonus issues have been met through 12/31/99.

DEA 1/7/2000
<PAGE>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 4.2

[LOGO]

SkyLynx
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NUMBER
SHARES
INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
AUTHORIZED: 150,000,000 COMMON SHARES, $.001 PAR VALUE PER SHARE
CUSIP 830857 10 8
This Certifies That
is the owner of
SEE REVERSE FOR
CERTAIN DEFINITIONS
Fully Paid and Non-Assessable Common Shares, $.001 Par Value, of
SkyLynx Communications, Inc.
transferable on the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof, in person or
by authorized attorney, upon surrender of this Certificate properly endorsed.
This Certificate is not valid unless duly countersigned by the Transfer Agent
and Registrar.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused the facsimile signatures of its
duly authorized officers and its facsimile seal to be hereunto affixed.
DATED:
[Ned A. Bell]
SECRETARY
[Seal]
[Jeffery A. Mathias]
PRESIDENT
COUNTERSIGNED:
AMERICAN SECURITIES TRANSFER & TRUST, INC.
P.O. Box 1596, Denver, Colorado  80201
By:
Transfer Agent - Authorized Signature
<PAGE>

SkyLynx Communications, Inc.
Transfer Fee: $20.00 Per New Certificate Issued
The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this
certificate, shall be construed as though they were written out in full
according to applicable laws or regulations.
     TEN COM   - as tenants in common
     TEN ENT   - as tenants by the entireties
     JT TEN    - as joint tenants with rights of
     survivorship and not as tenants
     in common
UNIF GIFT MIN ACT - Custodian for
(Cust.)  (Minor)
under Uniform Gifts to Minors
Act of
(State)
Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list.
For value received hereby sell, assign and transfer unto
PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER
IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE
Please print or type name and address of assignee
Shares
of the Common Stock represented by the within Certificate and do hereby
irrevocably constitute and appoint
Attorney to  transfer the said stock on the books of the within named
Corporation, with full power of substitution in the premises.
Dated
SIGNATURE GUARANTEED:
     X

     X
THE SIGNATURE TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME AS WRITTEN UPON
THE FACE OF THIS CERTIFICATE IN EVERY PARTICULAR, WITHOUT ALTERATION OR
ENLARGEMENT OR ANY CHANGE WHATSOEVER. THE SIGNATURE(S) MUST BE GUARANTEED BY AN
ELIGIBLE GUARANTOR INSTITUTION (Banks, Stockbrokers, Savings and Loan
Associations and Credit Unions) WITH MEMBERSHIP IN AN APPROVED SIGNATURE
GUARANTEE MEDALLION PROGRAM PURSUANT TO RULE 17Ad-15 UNDER THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED.
#### 1216.203-470 Solicitation provision.

The contracting officer shall insert the provision at 1252.216-70, Evaluation of Offers Subject to an Economic Price Adjustment Clause, in solicitations containing an economic price adjustment clause.
UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C.  20549



FORM 6-K

REPORT OF FOREIGN PRIVATE ISSUER

PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-16 OR 15d-16

UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934



Dated August 1, 2007



Commission File Number: 001-14666



MITTAL STEEL COMPANY N.V.

(Translation of registrants name into English)



15th Floor, Hofplein 20

3032 AC Rotterdam

The Netherlands

(Address of principal executive offices)



Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports under cover Form 20-F or Form 40-F.



Form 20-FxForm 40-Fo



Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1): _____



Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7): _____



Indicate by check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the information contained in this Form is also thereby furnishing the information to the Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.



YesoNox



If Yes marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the registrant in connection with Rule 12g3-2(b):  82-________












---







On July 26, 2007, Mittal Steel Company N.V. issued the press release attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1. On August 1, 2007, Mittal Steel Company N.V. issued a press release relating to its results for the second quarter and first half of 2007, an extract of which is attached hereto as Exhibit 99.2. Exhibits 99.1 and 99.2 are hereby incorporated by reference into this report on Form 6-K.  This report on Form 6-K is hereby incorporated by reference into ArcelorMittals registration statement on Form F-4 (File No. 333-144169) and into the proxy statement/ prospectus statement dated July 5, 2007.



Exhibit List



Exhibit No.
        DescriptionExhibit 99.1
        Press release dated July 26, 2007, announcing that an agreement has been reached to acquire the remaining 25.2% of shares in ArcelorMittal Poland.Exhibit 99.2
      Extract from a press  release dated August 1, 2007, announcing  results for the second quarter and first half 2007.















---



SIGNATURES



Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.



Date: August 1, 2007



By:
    /s/ Henk SchefferName:
    Henk SchefferTitle:
    Company Secretary













---









Exhibit Index

|Exhibit No.  | Description                                                                                                                                        | 
|------------ | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|Exhibit 99.1 | Press release dated July 26, 2007, announcing that an agreement has been reached to acquire the remaining 25.2% of shares in ArcelorMittal Poland.
|Exhibit 99.2 | Press release dated August 1, 2007, announcing record results for the second quarter and first half 2007.
#### The People of the State of New York, ex rel. Nathaniel Simon, Also Known as Vernon Turner, Petitioner, v Eugene L. LeFevre, as Superintendent of Clinton Correctional Facility, et al., Respondents.

Application, pursuant to CPLR 7002 (subd [b], par 2) for writ of habeas corpus, denied, on the ground that it appears petitioner is lawfully detained pursuant to the sentence imposed by the Supreme Court, New York County, on September 19, 1977 (see *Matter of Dubay v LeFevre,*60 AD2d 263; see, also, People ex rel. Schmidt v La Vallee, 39 NY2d 886). Greenblott, J. P., Kane, Main, Mikoll and Herlihy, JJ., concur.
§ 552.105 Purpose. ( a ) This regulation establishes procedures governing access control requirements for the Main Cantonment Area, Fort Lewis, Washington, and prohibits certain forms of conduct upon the Fort Lewis Military Reservation.
( b ) These procedures and requirements have been established in conjunction with other efforts to improve the physical security of the Fort Lewis Military Reservation. It is essential that entrance to, and exit from, the installation be made only at controlled access points, and that certain forms of conduct be restricted.
( c ) This regulation governs all access to the Main Cantonment Area of the Fort Lewis Military Reservation, including, but not limited to, all housing areas, Gray Army Air Field, and Madigan Army Medical Center. It further prohibits all persons from engaging in certain forms of conduct anywhere on the Fort Lewis Military Reservation.
90 FY 2020 AGENCY FINANCIAL REPORT | U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

REPORT OF THE INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS | FINANCIAL SECTION

FY 2020 AGENCY FINANCIAL REPORT | U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION 91
FINANCIAL SECTION | REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

92 FY 2020 AGENCY FINANCIAL REPORT | U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS | FINANCIAL SECTION

FY 2020 AGENCY FINANCIAL REPORT | U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION 93
FINANCIAL SECTION | REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

94 FY 2020 AGENCY FINANCIAL REPORT | U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS | FINANCIAL SECTION

FY 2020 AGENCY FINANCIAL REPORT | U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION 95
FINANCIAL SECTION | REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

96 FY 2020 AGENCY FINANCIAL REPORT | U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS | FINANCIAL SECTION

FY 2020 AGENCY FINANCIAL REPORT | U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION 97
FINANCIAL SECTION | REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

98 FY 2020 AGENCY FINANCIAL REPORT | U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS | FINANCIAL SECTION

FY 2020 AGENCY FINANCIAL REPORT | U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION 99
FINANCIAL SECTION | REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

100 FY 2020 AGENCY FINANCIAL REPORT | U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS | FINANCIAL SECTION

FY 2020 AGENCY FINANCIAL REPORT | U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION 101
FINANCIAL SECTION | REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

102 FY 2020 AGENCY FINANCIAL REPORT | U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS | FINANCIAL SECTION

FY 2020 AGENCY FINANCIAL REPORT | U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION 103
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

MICHAEL ANDREW NOLL,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 11 MM 2019

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 29th day of March , 2019, the Application for Leave to File Petition

for Allowance of Appeal Nunc Pro Tunc is DENIED.
No. 774.

#### Southwestern Gas & Electric Company *v.*City of Shreveport.

March 29, 1920.

*Mr. Max Pam*for petitioner.

No appearance for respondent.

Petition for a writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Nicholas Kamisaroff, Appellant, v. W. Cecil Johnston, as Director of Dannemora State Hospital, Respondent.

Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Present — Bergan, P. J., Coon, Gibson, Herlihy and Reynolds, JJ.
**EXHIBIT(12)**

**COMPUTATIONOF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES**
|                                                                      | ** ** | **Twelve  Months Ended  March 31, 2007** | ** ** |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|---------------------------------------------------------|------------|
|                                                                 |       |                                                    |       |
| Income before  provision for income taxes and fixed charges (Note A) |       | $                                                       | 99,790,677 |   |
|                                                                 |       |                                                    |       |
| Fixed charges:                                                       |       |                                                    |       |
| Interest on  long-term debt                                          |       | $                                                       | 26,953,204 |   |
| Interest on  short-term debt                                         |       | 2,928,770                                               |       |
| Interest on note  payable to securitization trust                    |       | 4,250,000                                               |       |
| Other interest                                                       |       | 1,046,315                                               |       |
| Rental expense  representative of an interest factor (Note B)        |       | 115,162                                                 |       |
| ** **                                                           | ** ** | ** **                                              | ** ** |
| **Total  fixed charges**                                             | ** ** | **35,293,451**                                          | ** ** |
| ** **                                                           | ** ** | ** **                                              | ** ** |
| Ratio of earnings to  fixed charges                                  |       | 2.83                                                    | x          |

 

----

NOTE A:     Forthe purpose of determining earnings in the calculation of the ratio, net incomehas been increased by the provision for income taxes, non-operating incometaxes, minority interest and by the sum of fixed charges as shown above.

NOTE B:      One-thirdof rental expense (which approximates the interest factor).

----
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE:           1997      1996      1995
(In thousands, except per share amounts)     ----      ----      ----
<S>                                          <C>       <C>       <C>
Net income*...............................   $12,178   $12,912   $11,833

Earnings per common share:
  Basic...................................     $0.98     $1.05     $0.96
  Diluted.................................     $0.93     $1.01     $0.94

Shares outstanding (average):
  Common shares...........................    13,330    12,991    12,695
  Treasury shares.........................      (930)     (728)     (337)
                                             -------   -------   -------
Common shares -- basic (average)              12,400    12,263    12,358
Options: common equivalents...............       679       526       227
Warrants: common equivalents..............        --         8        --
                                             -------   -------   -------
Common shares -- diluted (average)........    13,079    12,797    12,585
                                             =======   =======   =======
</TABLE>

*Note: The Company did not have any outstanding preferred stock for the periods
ending December 31, 1995 through 1997.
#### § 634.2 References.

Required and related publications along with prescribed and referenced forms are listed in Appendix A, AR 190-5.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Anthony Emmino, Appellant.

Motion for leave to appeal as a poor person from an order denying a *coram nobis*application., Motion denied. An examination of the papers submitted on this motion discloses that as matter of law the remedy of *coram nobis*is not available to the appellant on any of the grounds urged by him. Beldock, Acting P. J., Christ, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur.
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Lillian Hilliker, on Behalf of Herself and Minor Children, Respondent, v. North American Van Lines, Inc., et al., Appellants-Respondents, and P. J. Garvey Carting & Storage, Inc., et al., Respondents-Appellants. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.

Appeal from a decision and award of the Workmen’s Compensation Board Decedent was a long distance truck driver and was killed when his truck went off the road near Irving, New York, on a trip scheduled between Buffalo and Sioux Cityq Iowa. He was hired by appellant Garvey, a common carrier; but since Garvey had no interstate commerce authorization to carry to Iowa, this shipment was undertaken under a lease of equipment agreement with appellant North American, which had interstate authority. The equipment thus leased was for the *“*exclusive use, possession and service ” of North American which, among other things, had the right to “ remove * * * and * * * replace ” the driver. The board thus had before it a record fully adequate to determine that Garvey was decedent’s general employer and North American his special employer and that for this accident compensation responsibility be shared by the two employers. Appellants argue that the accident did not arise out of or in the course of employment. Route No. 5 was the usual route from Buffalo to Sioux City; but decedent was not directed to follow it. His directions in respect of the trip were to meet a specified schedule of days and within that he could travel at any time consistent with Interstate Commerce Commission regulations as to sleep, or by any reasonable route. The accident occurred a short distance off of Route No. 5, but while the truck was moving in the direction, of that road and in the direction of its ultimate destination. This brings the accident fully within the scope of employment. Decedent could have stopped to sleep, or to eat, or for some personal purpose within the wide choice of time and route open to him, and when he resumed his movement toward the ultimate destination he would be within his employment. It is suggested that decedent left the road to deliver some chairs to his mother. But at the time of accident he had not delivered the chairs and he was moving in a direction away from his mother’s house toward Sioux City. Even if he had delivered the chairs it could be found that the general employer had consented to such delivery and that this employer’s broad agency for the special employer would have been *678sufficient to impose a compensation liability on the latter. Decision and award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board.
### §2442. Notice of refusal; reconsideration

(a) Whenever an application is refused, or any objection or requirement made by the examiner, the Secretary shall notify the applicant thereof, stating the reasons therefor, together with such information and references as may be useful in judging the propriety of continuing the prosecution of the application; and if after receiving such notice the applicant requests reconsideration, with or without amendment, the application shall be reconsidered.

(b) For taking appropriate action after the mailing to an applicant of an action other than allowance, the applicant shall be allowed at least 30 days, and not more than 180 days, or such other time as the Secretary shall set in the refusal, or such time as the Secretary may allow as an extension. Without such extension, action may be taken up to three months late by paying an additional fee to be prescribed by the Secretary.

(Pub. L. 91–577, title II, §62, Dec. 24, 1970, 84 Stat. 1549; Pub. L. 103–349, §§6, 13(j), Oct. 6, 1994, 108 Stat. 3140, 3143.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1994—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 103–349 in first sentence substituted "mailing to an applicant" for "mailing to him", "the applicant shall" for "an applicant shall", "at least 30 days, and not more than 180 days" for "six months", "the Secretary shall" for "the Secretary in exceptional circumstances shall", and "as the Secretary may" for "as he may".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1994 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 103–349 effective 180 days after Oct. 6, 1994, see section 15 of Pub. L. 103–349, set out as a note under section 2401 of this title.