alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §1626. Definitions

When used in this chapter, the term "agricultural products" includes agricultural, horticultural, viticultural, and dairy products, livestock and poultry, bees, forest products, fish and shellfish, and any products thereof, including processed and manufactured products, and any and all products raised or produced on farms and any processed or manufactured product thereof, and the term "State" when used in this chapter 1 shall include the Virgin Islands and Guam.

(Aug. 14, 1946, ch. 966, title II, §207, 60 Stat. 1091; Pub. L. 92–318, title V, §506(f), June 23, 1972, 86 Stat. 351.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text inserted by Pub. L. 92–318, probably means title II of act Aug. 14, 1946, which is classified generally to this chapter. For complete classification of title II to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1621 of this title and Tables.

#### Amendments

1972—Pub. L. 92–318 inserted ", and the term 'State' when used in this chapter shall include the Virgin Islands and Guam" before period at end.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1972 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 92–318 effective after June 30, 1970, see section 506(n) of Pub. L. 92–318, set out as a note under section 326a of this title.

1 See References in Text note below.
§ 989.34 Special and emergency procedures. ( a ) *Special procedures.* During the EIAP, unique situations may arise that require EIAP strategies different than those set forth in this part. These situations may warrant modification of the procedures in this part. EPFs should only consider procedural deviations when the resulting process would benefit the Air Force and still comply with NEPA and CEQ regulations. EPFs must forward all requests for procedural deviations to HQ USAF/A7CI (or ANGRC/CEV) for review and approval by SAF/IEI.
( b ) *Emergency procedures ( 40 CFR 1506.11 ).* Emergency situations do not exempt the Air Force from complying with NEPA, but do allow emergency response while completing the EIAP. Certain emergency situations may make it necessary to take immediate action having significant environmental impact, without observing all the provisions of the CEQ regulations or this part. If possible, promptly notify HQ USAF/A7CI, for SAF/IEI coordination and CEQ consultation .The immediate notification requirement does not apply where emergency action must be taken without delay. Coordination in this instance must take place as soon as practicable.
[64 FR 38129, July 15, 1999, as amended at 66 FR 16869, Mar. 28, 2001; 72 FR 37106, July 9, 2007; 79 FR 35287, June 20, 2014]
1232.770-6 Procedures. ( a ) An incrementally funded fixed-price, time-and-materials, or labor-hour contract shall be fully funded once funds are available.
( b ) The contracting officer shall ensure that sufficient funds are allotted to the contract to cover the total amount payable to the contractor in the event of termination for convenience by the Government.
( c ) Upon receipt of the contractor's notice under paragraph (c) of the clause at 1252.232-71, Limitation of Government's Obligation, the contracting officer shall promptly provide written notice to the contractor that the Government is— ( 1 ) Obligating additional funds for continued performance and increasing the Government's limitation of obligation in a specified amount;
( 2 ) Obligating the full amount of funds needed;
( 3 ) Terminating for convenience, as applicable, the affected line items or contract; or
( 4 ) Considering whether to allot additional funds; and ( i ) The contractor is entitled by the contract terms to stop work when the Government's limitation of obligation is reached; and
( ii ) Any costs expended beyond the Government's limitation of obligation are at the contractor's risk.
( d ) Upon learning that the contract will receive no further funds by the date provided in the notice under paragraph (c) of the clause at 1252.232-71, Limitation of Government's Obligation, the contracting officer shall promptly give the contractor written notice of the Government's decision and terminate the affected line items or contract, as applicable, for the convenience of the Government.
#### Milton B. Hollander et al. *v.*Warren D. Anderson et al.

Decided February 4, 1975

No one having appeared to press the defendants’ motion to dismiss the appeal from the Court of Common Pleas in Fairfield County at Stamford, the motion is dismissed.
#### 1311.103 Market acceptance.

The designee authorized as the head of the agency is set forth in CAM 1301.70.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 99-20546

 

AMBER, INC.;

NIDERA HANDELSCOMPAGNIE B V,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

versus

PM AG PRODUCTS, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee.

 

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Southern District of Texas

(H-98-CV-1047)

 

April 12, 2000

Before REYNALDO G. GARZA, HIGGINBOTHAM, and BENAVIDES, Circuit

Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

We affirm for essentially the reasons stated by the trial

court. 

AFFIRMED.
#### Anita C. Silberman, Appellant-Respondent, v Ira Silberman, Respondent-Appellant.

In a divorce action, the parties cross-appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered March 11, 1977, which, *inter alia,*fixed the amounts of alimony, child support, and counsel fees. Judgment modified, on the law and the facts, by (1) increasing the award of alimony to the sum of $150 per week; (2) increasing the award of child support to the sum of $75 per week; and (3) adding a provision to the fifth decretal paragraph that if the defendant’s existing medical insurance *779plan does not provide coverage for the plaintiff, he must provide her with other comparable coverage. As so modified, judgment affirmed, with costs to the plaintiff. Special Term found that the plaintiff wife "has work experience and is employable”. However, we find that she is not "employable” within the meaning of *Kay v Kay*(37 NY2d 632). Further, we construe the fifth decretal paragraph as requiring the defendant husband to provide the plaintiff with other comparable coverage if his existing medical insurance plan does not cover a former wife. Hopkins, J. P., Damiani, Rabin and Margett, JJ., concur.
#### 1314.404 Rejection of bids.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THE SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE
EQUITY  OIL  COMPANY  FORM  10-Q FOR THE  PERIOD  ENDED  JUNE  30,  2000 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                       2,847,911
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,045,650
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,155,674
<PP&E>                                     104,857,743
<DEPRECIATION>                              64,725,385
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              47,746,586
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,074,084
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    12,808,040
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,719,743
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                47,746,586
<SALES>                                     10,791,419
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            12,019,939
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                7,658,771
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             614,567
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,746,601
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,385,069
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,361,532
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,361,532
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .18



</TABLE>
DO46130206532126461

DO462W Feb 6, 2013 CDX

Imogene Treble Product Regulatory Leader The Dow Chemical Company

trebleie@dow.com 908-431-5934

1803 Building
Midland MI 48674

Imogene Treble Product Regulatory Leader The Dow Chemical Company

trebleie@dow.com 908-431-5934

1803 Building
Midland MI 48674 USA



### X SANITIZED SUBMISSIONDue to the large file size the test data will be submitted in 4 support files SANITIZED SUBMISSION001 14 Day Palatability Public 14 Day Palatability Study Public.pdf 53
002 28 Day Dietary Tox Study Public 28 Day Dietary Tox Study Public.pdf 326
003 Acute Eye Irritation Public AC Eye Irritation Public.pdf 50
004 Ames Assay Public Ames Assay Public.pdf 59 SANITIZED SUBMISSION

### ATTACHMENT HEADER SHEET

Attachment Number 001 Attachment Name 14 Day Palatability Public 

### Associated PMN Section Number

N/A
Does not contain CBI 

### Report Number DO46130206532126461 SANITIZED SUBMISSION

### ATTACHMENT HEADER SHEET

Attachment Number 002 Attachment Name 28 Day Dietary Tox Study Public 

### Associated PMN Section Number

N/A
Does not contain CBI 

### Report Number DO46130206532126461 SANITIZED SUBMISSION

### ATTACHMENT HEADER SHEET

Attachment Number 003 Attachment Name Acute Eye Irritation Public 

### Associated PMN Section Number

N/A
Does not contain CBI 

### Report Number DO46130206532126461 SANITIZED SUBMISSION

### ATTACHMENT HEADER SHEET

Attachment Number 004 Attachment Name Ames Assay Public 

### Associated PMN Section Number

N/A
Does not contain CBI 

### Report Number DO46130206532126461 SANITIZED SUBMISSION
Exhibit 12(b)
                      ELIZABETHTOWN WATER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARY
                   Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
                                  and Preferred Dividends
                               (In Thousands Except Ratios)

                                           Three Months Ended  Nine Months Ended
                                                  September 30,   September 30,
                                                 1999    1998     1999     1998
EARNINGS:

Net income                                     $ 7,880 $ 8,689  $18,506 $19,021
Federal income taxes                             4,201   4,633    9,831  10,106
Interest charges                                 4,021   3,797   11,882  11,511
                                               ---------------------------------
 Earnings available to cover fixed charges      16,102  17,119   40,219  40,638
                                               ---------------------------------


FIXED CHARGES AND PREFERRED DIVIDENDS:

Interest on long-term debt                       3,507   3,651   10,959  10,988
Preferred dividend requirement (1)                 311     311      933     933
Other interest                                     490     229      868     627
Amortization of debt discount - net                 99      98      295     293
                                               ---------------------------------
Total fixed charges                            $ 4,407 $ 4,289  $13,055 $12,841
                                               ---------------------------------
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
 and Preferred Dividends                          3.65    3.99     3.08    3.16
                                               =================================


(1) Preferred Dividend Requirement:

Preferred dividends                                203     203      609     609
Effective tax rate                               34.78%  34.78%   34.69%  34.70%
                                               ---------------------------------
Preferred dividend requirement                 $   311     311      933     933
                                               =================================



Earnings to Fixed Charges and Preferred Dividends represents the sum of
Net Income, Federal income taxes and Interest
Charges (which is reduced by Allowance for Debt Funds Used During
Construction), divided by Fixed Charges.  Fixed Charges and Preferred
Dividends consist of interest on long and short-term debt (which is not
reduced by Allowance for Debt Funds Used During Construction), dividends
on Preferred Stock on a pretax basis and Amortization of debt discount.
<PAGE>
                       AMENDMENT NO. 16

                              TO

               PENNSYLVANIA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY

                 EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN

	WHEREAS, Pennsylvania Power & Light Company ("Company") has 
adopted the Pennsylvania Power & Light Company Employee Stock 
Ownership Plan ("Plan") effective January 1, 1975; and
	WHEREAS, the Plan was amended and restated effective Janu-
ary 1, 1987, and subsequently amended by Amendment Nos. 1, 2, 3, 
4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15; and
	WHEREAS, the Company desires to further amend the Plan;
	NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended effective 
January 1, 1989 as follows:
  I.   Effective January 1, 1989, the following sections of Arti-
cle II are amended to read:
	2.8  "Compensation" shall mean the following. 
	    (a)  Compensation shall mean the annual compensation 
received by an Employee from the Company as reported on Internal 
Revenue Service Form W-2 or a successor form plus the Employee's 
elective deferrals under the Employee Savings Plan or Deferred 
Savings Plan; provided, however, that Compensation shall not 
include fringe benefits not normally included in compensation, 
such as tuition refunds, moving expenses, etc. and shall not, for 
purposes of allocation under Section 5.2(a), include any amount 
in excess of (i) for the 1975 and 1976 Plan Years, $16,000 and 
(ii) commencing with the 1977 Plan Year, the median annual com-
pensation of all Participants during the Plan Year or $100,000, 
whichever is less.  Such median compensation shall be determined 
as of the close of a Plan Year and shall be rounded to an even 
thousand dollars.

	    (b)  With respect to a Highly Compensated Eligible 
Employee who is one of the 10 most highly compensated employees 
of the Company and Affiliated Companies or a 5% owner, the Com-
pensation of such individual plus the Compensation, if any, of 
his spouse and lineal descendants who have not attained age 19 
before the close of the Plan Year, that is taken into account 
under the Plan, shall not exceed $200,000 as indexed (for Plan 
Years beginning on or after January 1, 1989 and before January 1, 
1994), or $150,000 as indexed (for Plan Years beginning on or 
after January 1, 1994).  This limit shall be allocated among 
family members in proportion to their Compensation as defined in 
Subsection (a).

	II.  Except as provided for in this Amendment No. 16, all 
other provisions of the Plan shall remain in full force and 
effect.
	IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment No. 16 is executed this 
5th day of February, 1996.

                               PENNSYLVANIA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY



                               By:/s/ John M. Chappelear_________
                                   John M. Chappelear
                                   Vice President-Investments &
                                   Pensions
# Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed December 13, 2023

. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D2023

- 1327

Lower Tribunal No. F07

- 26648

________________



### Orlando Perez

- Martinez

, Appellant,

vs.



### The State of Florida

, Appellee.

An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from

the Circuit Court for Miami

- Dade County, Ramiro C. Areces , Judge.

Orlando Perez

- Martinez , in proper per son.

Ashley Moody , Attorney General, and Magaly Rodriguez , Assistant
Attorney General, for appellee.

Before LOGUE, C.J., and HENDON and GORDO , JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
### §6925. Food Access Liaison

#### (a) Establishment

The Secretary shall establish the position of Food Access Liaison to coordinate Department programs to reduce barriers to food access and monitor and evaluate the progress of such programs in accordance with this section.

#### (b) Duties

The Food Access Liaison shall—

(1) coordinate the efforts of the Department, including regional offices, to experiment and consider programs and policies aimed at reducing barriers to food access for consumers, including but not limited to participants in nutrition assistance programs;

(2) provide outreach to entities engaged in activities to reduce barriers to food access in accordance with the statutory authorization for each program;

(3) provide outreach to entities engaged in activities to reduce barriers to food access, including retailers, markets, producers, and others involved in food production and distribution, with respect to the availability of, and eligibility for, Department programs;

(4) raise awareness of food access issues in interactions with employees of the Department;

(5) make recommendations to the Secretary with respect to efforts to reduce barriers to food access; and

(6) submit to Congress an annual report with respect to the efforts of the Department to reduce barriers to food access.

(Pub. L. 103–354, title II, §225, as added Pub. L. 115–334, title XII, §12614(a), Dec. 20, 2018, 132 Stat. 5014.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Another section 225 of Pub. L. 103–354 is classified to section 6931 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Technical Assistance

Pub. L. 115–334, title XII, §12614(b), Dec. 20, 2018, 132 Stat. 5014, provided that: "The Secretary [of Agriculture] shall provide technical assistance to entities that are participants, or seek to participate, in Department of Agriculture programs related to reduction of barriers to food access."
#### State of New York, Appellant, v William Falter, Respondent.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court at Special Term, entered June 17, 1977 in Albany County, which denied plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and granted summary judgment in favor of defendant dismissing the complaint. The plaintiff, without any reference to statutes or common-law precedents, asserts in this court that the father of an infant has an absolute duty to pay any bill which the State as operator of a hospital might submit for hospital services rendered to such infant. The present record establishes that the hospital rendered services to an infant, but there is no showing that such services were necessary and/or were provided at the request of the father. Special Term was undoubtedly correct in denying the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment. The record contains a ledger card which clearly lists "Aetna Casualty & Surety” as the surety for the services to be rendered. The hospital chose not to have the father execute an indemnity agreement as was done on a prior occasion and it is clear that the policy of the hospital was only to require secondary liability at most on the part of parents when there was insurance available. In any event, there is no showing that the patient infant was not an insured within the meaning of the insurance policy and, therefore, there is a complete failure of any showing that the father has failed to provide items of necessity for his son. Accordingly, the grant of summary judgment in favor of the father was appropriate upon this record. Order affirmed, without costs, and without prejudice to any rights or claims the State of New York may have against Aetna Casualty and Surety. Kane, J. P., Main, Larkin, Mikoll and Herlihy, JJ., concur.
1332.006-4 Procedures. ( a ) The Agency Head as described under 1332.006-4 is set forth in CAM 1301.70.
( b ) The Office of Inspector General shall perform the function of the Remedy Coordination Official.
# Fourth Court of Appeals
San Antonio, Texas

December 29, 2017

No. 04

- 17

- 00371

- CV

IN THE MATTER OF THE GUARDIANSHIP OF DONNA JEAN HAMMOND, AN INCAPACITATED PERSON

,

From the 49th Ju dicial District Court, Zapata County, Texas

Trial Court No. 9,688 Honorable Jose A. Lopez, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellant has filed a motion requesting that this court provide him with a copy of the reporter’s record. We grant the motion and order the clerk of this court to send appellant electronic copies of the volumes of the reporter’s record that have been filed in this case. We further order appellant, Ronald E. Smith, to file the amended brief, as per this court’s October 27, 2017 and No vember 22, 2017 orders, by January 18, 2018

. Appellant is advised that if he does not timely file the amended brief, this appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution

.

_____________________________ ____ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 29th day of December, 2017

.

______________________ _____________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
### §1376. Court jurisdiction; duties of United States attorneys; remedies and penalties as additional

The several district courts of the United States are vested with jurisdiction specifically to enforce the provisions of this subchapter. If and when the Secretary shall so request, it shall be the duty of the several United States attorneys in their respective districts, under the direction of the Attorney General, to institute proceedings to collect the penalties provided in this subchapter. The remedies and penalties provided for herein shall be in addition to, and not exclusive of, any of the remedies or penalties under existing law. This section also shall be applicable to liquidated damages provided for pursuant to section 1349 of this title.

(Feb. 16, 1938, ch. 30, title III, §376, 52 Stat. 66; June 25, 1948, ch. 646, §1, 62 Stat. 869; Pub. L. 88–297, title I, §106(2), Apr. 11, 1964, 78 Stat. 176.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1964—Pub. L. 88–297 provided for application of this section to liquidated damages under section 1349 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Act June 25, 1948, eff. Sept. 1, 1948, substituted "United States attorneys" for "district attorneys". See section 541 of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure, and Historical and Revision Notes thereunder.
#### 1303.104-7 Violations or possible violations.

Suspected violations of the Procurement Integrity Act shall be reported to the individuals designated in CAM 1301.70.
### §6994. Notice and opportunity for hearing

Not later than 10 working days after an adverse decision is made that affects the participant, the Secretary shall provide the participant with written notice of such adverse decision and the rights available to the participant under this subchapter or other law for the review of such adverse decision.

(Pub. L. 103–354, title II, §274, Oct. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 3230.)