alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### ROBBINS, Respondent, v. BRIDGMAN, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.

November 18, 1903.)

Action by Marcus Robbins against Malcolm L. Bridgman. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. Affirmed.

Charles H. Luscomb, for appellant.

Maas & Goldberg, for respondent.

BLANCHARD, J.

The only question which appears to have been seriously litigated in this action was whether or not the plaintiff’s assignor was able, to secure a theatrical license, as contemplated by the agreement of August, 1902. ¿This was a question of fact, which the trial justice resolved in favor of the plaintiff, and we think his determination is fully justified by the evidence in the case. Judgment must be affirmed, with costs. All concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<CIK> 0000764403
<NAME> E'TOWN CORPORATION
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      560,548
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                     14,231
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                          35,383
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                        46,619
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 656,781
<COMMON>                                       146,727
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                        1,315
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                             41,919
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 189,961
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     12,000
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           193,375
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                              69,000
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                        0
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                           30
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 197,575
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  661,941
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                       30,121
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                             1,891
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      20,219
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      22,110
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                          8,011
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                  77
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                   8,088
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         4,415
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,673
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        203
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                    3,470
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                         3,985
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                        3,447
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                           5,721
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .44
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .44<F1>
<FN>
<F1>ALL AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
#### Jones, assignee, *vs.*The Mobile *&*Girard Railroad; Powell *vs.*Boutell.

[Warner, Chief Justice, being engaged in presiding over the senate organized as a court of impeachment, did not sit in this case.]

The defendant in error moved to dismiss this case on the ground that there can he no writ of error to a voluntary *non-suit.*

Such appears to be the law. 7 *Ga.,*79, 227; 9 *Ga.,*207; 33 *Ga.,*205; 60 *Ga.,*117; 10 Wendell, 169; 3 Howard, Miss., 332, cited by defendant in error.

*447The precise language of the *non-suit*is as follows: “At this term of the court comes the said plaintiff and *takes*a *non-suit*of said cause *•without prejudice and with leave to except to any errors.”*The only-question is this, does the reservation alter the principle ruled in the above stated cases ? We do not see how a right never possessed can be reserved, and without the production of some authority taking the case out of the general rule by reason of this reservation, the case must be dismissed on the strength of the authorities cited.

A motion was made by leave of the court to reinstate this case on the production of authority, and 5 *Ga.,*171, and 61 *Ga.,*460, were cited, but we do not think that those cases take this without the general rule.

Writ of error dismissed.

Jackson, Justice.
### §389a. Conditions of transfer of dry land and irrigation field stations; reservation of mineral rights

Conveyances or patents under this section and section 389 of this title shall be upon such conditions as in the opinion of the Secretary of Agriculture will assure the use of such station in the cooperative agricultural experimental work of the Department of Agriculture and the respective State. Any such conveyances of the land shall contain a reservation to the United States of all the minerals in the land together with the right to prospect for, mine, and remove the same under such regulations as the Secretary of the Interior may prescribe.

(Sept. 23, 1950, ch. 1005, §2, 64 Stat. 982.)

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

Functions of all officers, agencies, and employees of Department of Agriculture transferred, with certain exceptions, to Secretary of Agriculture by 1953 Reorg. Plan No. 2, §1, eff. June 4, 1953, 18 F.R. 3219, 67 Stat. 633, set out as a note under section 2201 of this title.
EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Emerson Radio Corp. (the "Company")
on Form  10-Q  for the  quarter  ended  September  30,  2002 as  filed  with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission (the "Report"),  I, Kenneth A. Corby,  Chief
Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects,  the consolidated financial condition and result of operations of
     the Company.


Dated: November 8, 2002
                                               /s/ Kenneth A. Corby
                                                   Kenneth A. Corby
                                                   Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<CIK> 0000032379
<NAME> ELIZABETHTOWN WATER CO
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      560,925
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                         80
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                          37,961
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                        46,925
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 645,891
<COMMON>                                        15,741
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      118,295
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                             49,918
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 183,954
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     12,000
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           231,941
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                              21,500
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                       30
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 196,466
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  645,891
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                       32,333
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                             2,518
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      20,834
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      23,352
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                          8,981
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                 103
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                   9,084
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         4,222
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,862
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        203
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                    4,659
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                         4,019
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                        3,394
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                           4,941
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0<F1>
<FN>
<F1>IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT
32

CERTIFICATIONS
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In
connection with the quarterly report of Quixote Corporation (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission as of the date hereof (the Report), each of the
officers of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
such officers knowledge:

| |    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                    
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
 Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                                                             
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                    
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly
 presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
 operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in
 the Report.

|      |                  |                                          | 
|----- | ---------------- | ---------------------------------------- | 
|Date: | November 9, 2009 | /s/ BRUCE REIMER                         | 
|      |                  |                                          | 
|      |                  | Bruce Reimer, Chief Executive Officer    | 
|      |                  |                                          | 
|Date: | November 9, 2009 | /s/ DANIEL P. GOREY                      | 
|      |                  |                                          | 
|      |                  | Daniel P. Gorey, Chief Financial Officer | 

The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure.

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

MPOWER SOFTWARE SERVICES, LLC, AND MPOWER MANAGED SERVICES,

LLC.

v.

AMERICAN WATER WORKS SERVICE COMPANY, INC. AND VIRTUAL DYNAMIX, LLC

PETITION OF: AMERICAN WATER WORKS SERVICE COMPANY, INC. :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 354 MAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 3rd day of April, 2018

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
# Trave l Master s email : trvlmasters@usa.ne t 73 7 N

. Ne

wBallas ah e Plaz

a Shops) • St

. Louis , Missour i 6314 1 • 31 4 / 432-757 5 • Fa

x31 4 / 432-481 8

Februar y24 , 201 0 Th e Honorabl e Ra yLaHoo d Secretar y Unite d State s Departmen t o fTransportatio n 120 0 Ne wJerse yAvenue , S E Washington , D.C

. 2059 0 Subject : Haned a Combinatio n Service s Allocatio n Proceedin g DOT-OST
2010-001 8 Dea rSecretar yLaHood : As a dedicate d trave l partne ro fAmerica n Airlines , I a m writin g i n suppor t o fAmerican' s applicatio n t o provid e ne wservic e fro m Ne wYork' s Joh n F

. Kenned yInternationa l Airpor t an d Los Angele s Internationa l Airpor t t o Toky o Internationa l Airpor t a t Haneda

. I recogniz e an d applau d yo u an d th e Obam a administratio n fo ryou r succes s las t Decembe ri n reachin g a landmar k Ope n Skie s agreemen t wit h Japan , whic h open s u p Haned a t o servic e b yU.S

. airlines

. I encourag e you rselectio n o fAmerica n Airline s t o provid e nonsto p servic e tro m Ne wYor k

an d Los Angele s t o Haned a i n orde rt o provid e a n essentia l connectio n betwee n thre e o fth e world' s larges t financia l an d commerc e centers

. Recen t events , includin g th e successfu l preservatio n o fJapa n Airlines ' oneworl d Allianc e membership , hav e underscore d American' s stron g commitmen t t o th e trans-Pacifi cmarket

. America n is likewis e committe d t o Ne wYor k

an d Los Angele s - bot h vita l foca l point s o fbusiness , trade , entertainment , technolog yan d educatio n - providin g unsurpasse d ai r servic e sinc e th e mid-1900 sBot h th e Ne wYor k an d Los Angele s metr o area s wil l gai n significan t economi cbenefit s fro m thes e propose d ne wflights , a s wil l American' s customer s an d employees

. However , w e nee d you rhel p t o mak e th e JFK & LAX/Haned a connectio n a reality

. Therefore , I strongl yurg e yo u t o sa yye s t o America n Airline s an d its reques t fo rslot s t o fl yfro m Kenned yan d Los Angele s t o Haneda ! Sincerely , Anit a Morconte l Trave l Counselo r
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000033015
<NAME> ENSERCH CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          12,354
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  175,022
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    108,220
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               415,664
<PP&E>                                       4,554,450
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,830,296
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,309,873
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          554,603
<BONDS>                                        972,310
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          150,000
<PREFERRED>                                    175,000
<COMMON>                                       724,435
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,309,873
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,480,435
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,390,272
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,974
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              70,637
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 13,552
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,522
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,795
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (2,096)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,699
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.04)
        

</TABLE>
#### DE BONES et al., Appellants, v. RIGUERON et al., Respondents.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

October 23, 1903.)

Action by Tony De Bones and others against George H. Rigueron and others.

J. J. Quencer, for appellants. J. C. Thomson, for respondents.

No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
financial  statements  of The  Titan  Corporation's  Report on Form 10-Q for the
three and nine months ended September 30, 1999, and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000032258
<NAME>                        The Titan Corporation
<MULTIPLIER>                                      1000
<CURRENCY>                                 U.S DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                  1.000
<CASH>                                           4,207
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  131,787
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0<F1>
<INVENTORY>                                     12,492
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               163,059
<PP&E>                                          77,606
<DEPRECIATION>                                  49,130
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 293,108
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           71,668
<BONDS>                                        117,802
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        695
<COMMON>                                           437
<OTHER-SE>                                      85,705
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   293,108
<SALES>                                        274,059
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               274,059
<CGS>                                          211,147
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  211,147
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                38,274
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0<F1>
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,712
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 18,511
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,553
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             12,958
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    12,958
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.33
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.29
<FN>
<F1> Due to the use of condensed  financial  statements  for interim  reporting,
this information is not compiled on a quarterly basis.
</FN>


</TABLE>
### UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION WASHINGTON, DC
Skydive Myrtle Beach, Inc. Complainant/ Appellant



### v. FAA Docket 16-14-05 Horry County (South Carolina) Department of Airports Respondent

NOTICE OF EXTENSION OF TIME
This matter is before the Federa l Aviation Administratio n (FAA) based on the abovereferenced complaint, filed in accordance with FAA Rules of Practice for Federally-A ssisted Airport Enforcement Proceedings, 14 CFR, Part 16. Pursuant to 14 CFR, Part 16, subpart B, the date by which the Final Agency Decision will be issued in this matter is hereby extended to on or about May 23, 2016.

# ~ 

# yQ_;{._**J~** Eduardo A. Angeles**~ssociate** Administrator

for Airports 

# v;{" '\-**~c.** Date 1

### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on 

# -? L{_.{

# ~ , I caused to be placed in the United States mail (first class mail, postage paid) a true copy ofthe Notice ofExtension ofTime, addressed to:
Counsel for Complainant
Robert G. Eastman, Esq. Eastman & Associates, LLC P.O. Box 180 Charleston, SC 29402 robertgeastman@msn.com
Counsel for Respondent
David Y. Bannard, Es q. Foley 

### & Lardner LLP 111 Huntington Avenue Boston , MA 02199 dbannard@foley.com Jeffrey R. Blease, Esq. Foley 

### & Lardner LLP 111 Huntington Avenue Boston, MA 02199 jblease @foley.com Jaclyn V. Piltch, Esq. Foley & Lardner LLP 111 Huntington Avenue Boston, MA 02199 jpi1tch@foley.com Hand/Electronically Delivered to: FAA Part 16 Airport Proceedings Docket FAA Airport Compliance and Management Analysis, AC0-1 00 FAA New England Region, AEA

- 600

Cla udia Roberts Airport Compliance and Management

Analysis
EXHIBIT 32.2

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Esterline Technologies Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
April 29, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Form 10-Q), I,
Robert D. George, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

(1)       
          The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or
          78o(d)); and

(2)       
          The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                     |  |     |                                                                                            
|-------------------- |  | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated:  June 3, 2005 |  | By: | /s/  Robert D. George                                                                      
|                     |  |     | Robert D. GeorgeVice President, Chief Financial Officer,
           Secretary and Treasurer
|                     |  |     |
Editorial Note on Part 724
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 724 appear at 65 FR 62616, Oct. 19, 2000.

§ 724.112 Clemency discharge. ( a ) The clemency discharge was created by the President on September 16, 1974, in his Proclamation 4313, “Announcing a Program for the Return of Vietnam Era Draft Evaders and Military Deserters.” Upon issuance to individuals who have an undesirable discharge or a punitive discharge, a clemency discharge serves as a written testimonial to the fact that the individual has satisfied the requirements of the President's program, and has fully earned his/her return to the mainstream of American society in accordance with that program.
( b ) The clemency discharge is a neutral discharge, neither honorable nor less than honorable. It does not effect a change in the characterization of the individual's military service as having been under other than honorable condition, nor does it serves to change, seal, erase or in any way modify the individual's past military record. Therefore, if the underlying discharge was issued as a result of a general court-martial, the issuance of a Clemency Discharge does not subject the underlying characterization to review under 10 U.S.C. 1553. Clemency discharges are issued by the Commander, Naval Military Personnel Command or the Commandant of the Marine Corps when an individual has met the requirements of the Presidential Proclamation.
Case: 1:12-cv-00215 Document #: 7 Filed: 01/13/12 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:29
Case: 1:12-cv-00215 Document #: 7 Filed: 01/13/12 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:30