alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER AND

NOTICE OF INTENT TO DISMISS

Appellate case name: Gary T. Bohnert v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC

Appellate case number: 01-14-00043-CV

Trial court case number: 1027830

Trial court: County Civil Court at Law No. 2 of Harris County

On June 5, 2014, appellant, Gary T. Bohnert, representing that the parties have 

reached a settlement that has “been consummated by tender and receipt to the agreed-to 

settlement amount,” filed a motion to vacate the trial court’s judgment without regard to 

the merits and close the appeal. The motion is not signed by appellee’s counsel and does 

not otherwise reflect “an agreement signed by the parties or their attorneys” to vacate the 

trial court judgment and dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2); see also TEX.

R. APP. P. 10.1(a)(5) (requiring certificate of conference). Accordingly, we deny the

motion.

However, the existence of an actual controversy is essential to the exercise of 

appellate jurisdiction. See, e.g., Valley Baptist Med. Ctr. v. Gonzales, 33 S.W.3d 821, 822 

(Tex. 2000). Based on appellant’s motion, it appears to the Court that it no longer has 

jurisdiction over this appeal.

Accordingly, unless the parties to this appeal demonstrate, within 14 days of the 

date of this order and notice, that there is a live controversy between them as to the merits 

of this appeal, the appeal may be dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a).

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Jim Sharp

  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: July 24, 2014
###### Editorial Note on Part 724

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 724 appear at 65 FR 62616, Oct. 19, 2000.

#### § 724.209 Evidence supporting applications.

In the absence of law, evidence or policy to the contrary, naval discharges shall be considered just, equitable and proper as issued. When hearings are scheduled, applicants must be prepared to present their case at the scheduled time. In the absence of any other evidence, naval discharge review shall be undertaken by examination of available service and health records of the applicant. Normally, the responsibility for presenting evidence from outside available service and health records shall rest with the applicant. Applications in which elements of relevant information are obviously omitted will be returned for completion and resubmission.
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 5 (Friday, January 8, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 1497]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-00116]



[[Page 1497]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[ER-FRL-9054-7]


Environmental Impact Statements; Notice of Availability

    Responsible Agency: Office of Federal Activities, General 
Information 202-564-5632 or https://www.epa.gov/nepa.

Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact Statements (EIS)
Filed December 23, 2020 10 a.m. EST Through January 4, 2021 10 a.m. EST
Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.

Notice

    Section 309(a) of the Clean Air Act requires that EPA make public 
its comments on EISs issued by other Federal agencies. EPA's comment 
letters on EISs are available at: https://cdxnodengn.epa.gov/cdx-enepa-public/action/eis/search.

EIS No. 20210000, Draft, BOEM, NY, South Fork Wind Farm and South Fork 
Export Cable Project, Comment Period Ends: 02/22/2021, Contact: 
Michelle Morin 703-787-1722.

    Dated: January 4, 2021.
Cindy S. Barger,
Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal Activities.
[FR Doc. 2021-00116 Filed 1-7-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
Exhibit 32.2



Section 1350 Certification of the

Chief Financial Officer



I, Michael Smith, the chief financial officer of Cobra Electronics Corporation, certify that (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Cobra Electronics Corporation for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2004 (the Form 10-Q)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Cobra Electronics Corporation and its subsidiaries.



/s/ Michael SmithMichael SmithPrincipal Financial OfficerAugust 13, 2004
#### § 61.2 Applicability.

This subpart applies to the Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD), the Military Departments, the Office of the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the Joint Staff, the Combatant Commands, the Office of the Inspector General of the Department of Defense, the Defense Agencies, the DoD Field Activities, and all other organizational entities within the Department of Defense (referred to collectively in this subpart as the “DoD Components”).
EXHIBIT 32



Certificate of Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officers



The following statement is being made to the Securities and Exchange Commission solely for purposes of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
1350), which carries with it certain criminal penalties in the event of a knowing or willful misrepresentation.



Securities and Exchange Commission

450 Fifth Street, NW

Washington, DC 20549



Re: Andrew Corporation



Ladies and Gentlemen:



In accordance with the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18
USC 1350), each of the undersigned hereby certifies that:



| | (i) | this Current Report on Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Andrew Corporation.
| | ---- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated as of this 21st day of
November 2007.



|                                      |  |  |  |                                                     
|------------------------------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Ralph E. Faison                   |  |  |  | /s/ Marty R. Kittrell                               
|Ralph E. Faison                       |  |  |  | Marty R. Kittrell                                   
|President and Chief Executive Officer |  |  |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



124
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                             254,782
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       68,114
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   334,237
<PP&E>                                           5,730,011
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,826,379
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   3,237,869
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               63,785
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,174,084
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     3,237,869
<SALES>                                          1,498,978  
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,510,262
<CGS>                                            1,189,294
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,189,294
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   312,087
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   7,765
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      1,116
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  1,116
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                         1,116
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         0.19 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0.19
        


</TABLE>
1.603-3 Appointment. ( a ) Contracting officers shall be appointed in writing on an SF 1402, Certificate of Appointment, which shall state any limitations on the scope of authority to be exercised, other than limitations contained in applicable law or regulation. Appointing officials shall maintain files containing copies of all appointments that have not been terminated.
( b ) Agency heads are encouraged to delegate micro-purchase authority to individuals who are employees of an executive agency or members of the Armed Forces of the United States who will be using the supplies or services being purchased. Individuals delegated this authority are not required to be appointed on an SF 1402, but shall be appointed in writing in accordance with agency procedures.
[61 FR 39190, July 26, 1996]
#### Mastro Plastics Corp., Appellant, v. Emenee Industries, Inc., Respondent.

Order, entered July 9, 1964, unanimously modified, on the law, on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, without costs, to provide that the plaintiff shall, within 10 days after service of order hereon with notice of entry, serve its bill of particulars to the demand as modified by said order, and to further provide that if plaintiff does not have present knowledge as to some of the matters and detail required to be given in response to certain items of the demand, the plaintiff shall so state under oath and then, within 10 days after completion of examination before trial of defendant and the receipt of an executed transcript thereof, it shall serve a supplemental bill in full response to said items of the demand. (See *Matter of May,*17 A D 2d 729; *Parker-Lauer Realty Co.*v. *Long Is. R. R. Co.,*263 App. Div. 955; *Poliacoff*v. *Fink Realty Corp., 219*N. Y. S. 2d 452.) The order as so modified is affirmed. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Valente, McNally, Eager and Steuer, JJ.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

TRUSTEES of the CHICAGO REGIONAL )
COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS PENSION )
FUND, et al. ,)
)

Plaintiffs, ) Case No. 12 C 611
)

) Judge Bucklo

)
v. )
)
DRYWALL SERVICE, INC. )
)
Defendant. )

Motion for Entry of Judgment

Plaintiffs, by its attorney, Daniel P. McAnally, move this Honorable Court for an
entry of judgment and in support Plaintiffs state:

1 This is and ERISA trust fund case seeking delinquent contributions, interest,
liquidated damages, dues check-off and attorney fees.

2. On March 8, 2012 this Court entered an Order of Default against the
Defendant for its failure to answer to the complaint. (Exhibit A)
3. The Order of Default directed the Defendant, among other things, to submit
reportsand contributions. The Court retained jurisdiction to enter a final judgment forthe
_ contributions and dues checkoff shown to be owed by way of an estimate or otherwise,
including interest, liquidated damages and attorney fees pursuant to the trust agreements
and ERISA Section 1132(g)(2). (Exhibit A)

4. The Defendant failed to submit the monthly reports despite several requests
todo so. Asa result an estimate was performed based upon the prior 12 month reporting
period. The twelve month average is $94,637.78 as a result the ERISA contributions
claimed to be owed is $189,275.56 for the months of November 2011 through December
2011. The Defendant also failed to remit the union dues it withheld from the employees’
wages. The amount of estimated dues withheld is $9,829.64 for the period November 2011
through December 2011. (Exhibit B, affidavit of John Libby)


5. The Defendant owes interest on the unpaid ERISA contributions in the
amount of $1,354.29 pursuant to the Trust Agreements and 29 U.S.C. §1132(g)(2)(B).
(Exhibit B)

6. The Defendant owes liquidated damages on the unpaid ERISA contributions
jn the amount of $12,449.98 for the period August 2011 through December 2011 pursuant
to the Collective Bargaining Agreements, the Trust Agreements and 29 U.S.C.
§1132(g)(2)(C) (Gi). (Exhibit B)

7. The Defendant owes the sum of $2,583.75 for necessary and reasonable
attorney fees and costs of $405.00 which are collectible under the terms of the Collective
Bargaining Agreement, the Trust Agreements and 29 U.S.C. §1132(g)(2)(D). (Exhibit C,
affidavit of Daniel P. McAnally)

WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs pray that their motion for entry of judgment be granted
in the amount of $215,898.22.

Respectively submitted,

s/ DANIEL P. McANALLY
Attorney for Plaintiffs

Whitfield McGann & Ketterman
111 E. Wacker Drive

Suite 2600

Chicago, IL 60601

312.251.9700
#### Michael J. Stanzione, Appellant, v Harry S. Tishelman et al., Respondents.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on March 29. 1978, unanimously affirmed for the reasons stated by Nadel. J., at Special Term, without costs and without disbursements. Concur-Murphy, P. J., Lupiano, Fein, Sandier and Sullivan, JJ.
#### 1309.407 Suspension.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                  SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                        93,823
<SECURITIES>                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                 188,506
<ALLOWANCES>                  2,754
<INVENTORY>                   166,890
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              459,814
<PP&E>                        359,545
<DEPRECIATION>                221,955
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                691,154
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         127,093
<BONDS>                       35,693
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         0
<PREFERRED>                   0
<COMMON>                      1,027
<OTHER-SE>                    508,096
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  691,154
<SALES>                       869,475
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              869,475
<CGS>                         513,809
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 513,809
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              191,873
<LOSS-PROVISION>              646
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            5,003
<INCOME-PRETAX>               165,782
<INCOME-TAX>                  58,024
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           107,758
<DISCONTINUED>                19,416
<EXTRAORDINARY>               0
<CHANGES>                     0
<NET-INCOME>                  88,342
<EPS-PRIMARY>                 0.96
<EPS-DILUTED>                 0.96
        

</TABLE>
§ 1645.9 Statement of reason for denial. ( a ) Denial of a 4-D claim by a board must be accompanied by a statement specifying the reason(s) for such denial as prescribed in §§ 1633.9, 1651.4 and 1653.3 of this chapter. The reason(s) must in turn, be supported by evidence in the registrant's file.
( b ) If the board's denial is based on statements by the registrant or his witnesses at a personal appearance or on documentation in the registrant's file, such basis will be fully explained in the statement of reasons accompanying the denial.
Exhibit
32(e)


CERTIFICATE
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


FOR PPL
ELECTRIC UTILITIES CORPORATION'S 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
2008





In
connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of PPL Electric Utilities
Corporation (the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Covered
Report"), I, the principal executive officer of the Company, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, hereby certify that:





·
            The
      Covered Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
    and·
            The
      information contained in the Covered Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.











Date:  February
      27, 2009
            /s/ David
      G. DeCampliDavid
      G. DeCampli
              President
              PPL
      Electric Utilities Corporation





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
719 2ND AVENUE, SUITE 200  |  SEATTLE, WA 98104  |  P 206.394.3700

                                     SENT VIA EMAIL

March 22, 2016

United States Department of Transportation

Docket Management System

1200 New Jersey Avenue SE  

Washington, DC 20590

Re:  Petition for Amendment to Exemption No. 12308, filed pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Reform Act

and Part 11 of the Federal Aviation Regulations in Regulatory Docket No. FAA–2015–1758

Dear Sir/Madam:

Parametrix, Inc. (Parametrix) previously has been granted Exemption numbered 12308 (hereinafter the

Exemption) for the purpose of aerial data collection. Parametrix hereby requests an amendment to the

Exemption to allow an additional model of unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) that fully complies with the

conditions of the Exemption.

Parametrix wishes to operate the DJI Matrice 100 UAS under the same terms and conditions contained in

the Exemption. Attached hereto, and submitted as a confidential document, is the Flight Operations and

Procedures Manual for the DJI Matrice 100. All operations of the additional UAS will be in full compliance

with the terms of the previously granted Exemption.

Please contact me if you have any questions regarding this request for an amendment of our Exemption

The name and address of the applicant is:  

Parametrix, Inc.

Attn:  Steven K Aisaka

719 Second Avenue, Suite 200

Seattle, WA 98104

Ph.: 253‐501‐5206

Email: saisaka@parametrix.com

 

Regards,

Steven K. Aisaka, PE, SE, JD

Director of Risk Management

Parametrix, Inc.
ATTACHMENT A – OPERATIONS MANUAL
**EXHIBIT 23**

 

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement No. 33-58750 on Form S-8 dated February 24, 1993; Registration StatementNo. 33-58752 on Form S-8 dated February 24, 1993; Registration Statement No. 33-52487 on Form S-8 dated March 2, 1994 and Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement No. 33-52487 on Form S-8 datedMarch 3, 1994; Registration Statement No. 333-12743 on Form S-4 dated September 26, 1996; Registration Statement No. 333-52575 on Form S-8 dated May 13, 1998; Registration Statement No. 333-52238 on Form S-8 datedDecember 20, 2000; Registration Statement No. 333-74470 on Form S-8 dated December 4, 2001; Registration Statement No. 333-98333 on Form S-3 dated August 19, 2002; Registration Statement No. 333-104177 on Form S-4 datedJune 10, 2003; Registration Statement No. 333-107243 on Form S-8 dated July 22, 2003; Registration Statement No. 333-107550 on Form S-8 dated August 1, 2003 and Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Registration StatementNo. 333-1075500 on Form S-8 dated October 24, 2003, Registration Statement No. 333-110014 on Form S-3 dated October 28, 2003 and Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement No. 333-110014 datedJanuary 22, 2004 and Post-Effective Amendment No. 2 to Registration Statement No. 333-110014 dated January 30, 2004; Registration Statement No. 333-114914 on Form S-3 dated April 27, 2004 and Post-Effective AmendmentNo. 1 to Registration Statement No. 333-114914 dated May 12, 2004 and Post-Effective Amendment No. 2 to Registration Statement No. 333-114914 dated May 17, 2004; Registration Statement No. 333-117001 on Form S-3dated June 30, 2004 of our reports dated December 8, 2006, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Andrew Corporation, Andrew Corporation management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal controlover financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Andrew Corporation included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended September 30, 2006. 

 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP 

Chicago, Illinois 

December 8, 2006
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order
Lansing, Michigan
July 29, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver 136962 (34) Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices JOHN H. RAY,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 136962 COA: 281591 TODD R. PERKINS,

Defendant-Appellee.

___________________ ________________

On order of the Chief Ju stice, the motion to waive fees is considered and it is DENIED because MCL 600.2 963 requires that a prisoner pursuing a civil action be liable for filing fees. Within 21 days of the certification of this order, plaintiff shall pay to the Clerk of the Court the initial partial filing fee of $16.00, shall submit a copy of this order with the payment, and shall refile the copy of the pleadings which is being returned with this order. Failure to comply with this order shall result in the appeal not being filed in this Court. If plaintiff timely files the partia l fee and refiles the pleadings, monthly payments shall be made to the Department of Corrections in an amount of 50 percent of the deposits made to plain tiff’s account until the payments equal the balance due of $359.00. This amount shall then be remitted to this Court. Pursuant to MCL 600.2963(8) plaintiff shall not file furth er appeals in this Court until the entry fee in this case is paid in full. The Clerk of the Court sh all furnish two copies of th is order to plaintiff and return plaintiff’s pleadings with this order.

jm I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.
July 29, 2008
Clerk
#### 1331.205-6 Compensation for personal services.

The designee authorized to waive cost allowability limitations under certain circumstances regarding compensation of foreign nationals is set forth in CAM 1301.70.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

November 30, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

131558 Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman,
Justices

v SC: 131558 COA: 269393 Monroe CC: 04-034045-FH 04-034047-FH 04-034050-FH 04-034056-FH LEWIS JACK RUSSELL, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, th e application for leave to ap peal the May 12, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

s1122 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 30, 2006

Clerk