alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 195.7 Compliance information. ( a ) *Cooperation and assistance.* Each responsible Department official shall to the fullest extent practicable seek the cooperation of recipients in obtaining compliance with this part and shall provide assistance and guidance to recipients to help them comply voluntarily with this part.
( b ) *Compliance reports.* Each recipient shall keep such records and submit to the responsible Department official timely, complete and accurate compliance reports at such times, and in such form and containing such information, as the responsible Department official may determine to be necessary to enable him to ascertain whether the recipient has complied or is complying with this part. In general, recipients should have available for the Department racial and ethnic data showing the extent to which members of minority groups are beneficiaries of federally assisted programs. In the case of any program under which a primary recipient extends Federal financial assistance to any other recipient, such other recipient shall also submit such compliance reports to the primary recipient as may be necessary to enable the primary recipient to carry out its obligations imposed pursuant to this part.
( c ) *Access to sources of information.* Each recipient shall permit access by the responsible Department official during normal business hours to such of its books, records, accounts, and other sources of information, and its facilities as may be pertinent to ascertain compliance with this part. Where any information required of a recipient is in the exclusive possession of any other institution or person and this institution or person shall fail or refuse to furnish this information, the recipient shall so certify in its report and shall set forth what efforts it has made to obtain the information.
( d ) *Information to beneficiaries and participants.* Each recipient shall make available to participants, beneficiaries, and other interested persons such information regarding the provisions of this part and its applicability to the program under which the recipient receives Federal financial assistance, and make such information available to them in such manner, as the responsible Department official finds necessary to apprise such persons of the protections against discrimination assured them by the Act and this part.
[29 FR 19291, Dec. 31, 1964, as amended at 38 FR 17960, July 5, 1973]
§ 761.14 Aircraft: Group authorizations. Aircraft in the following categories, except those aircraft which have been denied individual authorization or have had a prior authorization revoked, may enter the defense areas indicated without individual authorization: ( a ) U.S. public aircraft to enter all defense areas.
( b ) U.S. private aircraft which are under charter to the Department of Defense (including the Military Airlift Command), or operating under a contract with the Department of Defense providing for the employment of such aircraft to overfly U.S. island positions to enter defense areas as authorized by controlling Defense Department agency. If landing at U.S. military facilities is required, see § 761.15(a).
( c ) Foreign flag aircraft for which special arrangements have been made under international agreements or treaties.
( d ) Aircraft operated by companies authorized to utilize naval facilities in defense areas for regular commercial activity, to enter defense areas associated therewith. For landing clearance at U.S. military facilities, see § 761.15(a).
( e ) Any aircraft in distress, subject to local clearance and control by senior officer present.
[41 FR 28958, July 14, 1976]
Docket Np: FAA-2016-3702 Dir ID: 2015-NM-103-AD
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 23




                      Consent of Independent Accountants

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-48781, 333-70101, 333-70101-01, 333-87847, 333-
87847-01 and 333-87847-02) of PPL Corporation and in the Registration Statements
on Form S-8 (Nos. 33-50031, 333-02003 and 333-95967) of PPL Corporation of our
report dated January 31, 2000 relating to the consolidated financial statements
and financial statement schedules, which appears in this Form 10_K.


PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
March 1, 2000
#### State ex rel. Commission for Higher Education *v.*Wethersfield School of Law, Inc.

*Wesley W. Horton,*in support of the motion.

Submitted February 3

decided February 7, 1975

The defendant’s motion to expedite the appeal from the Superior Court in Hartford County is denied.
Appeal No. 74-206.

#### Wendell D. Descoteaux *v.*Joseph Bonaventura.

*Aram K. Berberian,*for appellant. *Coia &. Lepore, Ltd., Albert J. Lepore,*for appellee.

Motion of appellant, Wendell D. Descoteaux, that case be assigned to the continuous argument list is denied as being moot.

Paolino, J. not participating.
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 9 (Thursday, January 14, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3228-3229]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-00606]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 11303]


In the Matter of the Amendment of the Designation of Lashkar i 
Jhangvi (and Other Aliases) as a Specially Designated Global Terrorist

    Based upon a review of the administrative record assembled in this 
matter, and in consultation with the Attorney General and the Secretary 
of

[[Page 3229]]

the Treasury, I have concluded that there is a sufficient factual basis 
to find that Lashkar i Jhangvi, uses the additional alias Lashkar e 
Jhangvi al-Alami, also known as Lashkar e Jhangvi al-Almi, also known 
as LeJ al-Alami.
    Therefore, pursuant to Section 1(b) of Executive Order 13224, I 
hereby amend the designation of Lashkar i Jhangvi as a Specially 
Designated Global Terrorist to include the following new aliases: 
Lashkar e Jhangvi al-Alami, Lashkar e Jhangvi al-Almi, and LeJ al-
Alami.
    This notice shall be published in the Federal Register.

    Dated: December 22, 2020.
Michael R. Pompeo,
Secretary of State.
[FR Doc. 2021-00606 Filed 1-13-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-AD-P
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

To the Board of Directors
CB Bancshares, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
333-81279 and 333-64437 on Form S-8 of CB Bancshares, Inc. of our report dated
January 17, 2002, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of CB Bancshares,
Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related
consolidated statements of income, changes in stockholders' equity and
comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended December 31, 2001, which report appears in the 2001
Annual Report on Form 10-K of CB Bancshares, Inc.

KPMG LLP

Honolulu, Hawaii
March 22, 2002
### §2270b. Department of Agriculture Inspector General investigation of Forest Service firefighter deaths

In the case of each fatality of an officer or employee of the Forest Service that occurs due to wildfire entrapment or burnover, the Inspector General of the Department of Agriculture shall conduct an investigation of the fatality. The investigation shall not rely on, and shall be completely independent of, any investigation of the fatality that is conducted by the Forest Service.

(Pub. L. 107–203, §1, July 24, 2002, 116 Stat. 744.)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated condensed balance sheets and consolidated condensed statements of
income and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          21,169
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  365,744
<ALLOWANCES>                                    20,340
<INVENTORY>                                    359,446
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               852,476
<PP&E>                                         901,502
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0<F1>
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,443,469
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          607,975
<BONDS>                                        627,544
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       119,999
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,732,193
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,443,469
<SALES>                                        387,446
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               867,561
<CGS>                                          274,553
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  624,804
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              31,917
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 15,441
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,903
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,717
<DISCONTINUED>                                (19,292)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (10,575)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.10)
<FN>
<F1>This amount is not disclosed in the financial statements and thus a value of
zero has been shown for purposes of this financial data schedule.
</FN>


</TABLE>
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
 
 
Computation of Earnings Per Share:
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
                                              1998      1997      1996
                                              ----      ----      ----
<S>                                         <C>       <C>       <C>
 
Net income*                                 $16,102   $12,178   $12,912
 
Earnings per common share:
 Basic                                      $  1.27   $  0.98   $  1.05
 Diluted                                    $  1.20   $  0.93   $  1.01
 
Shares outstanding (average):
 Common shares                               13,773    13,330    12,991
 Treasury shares                             (1,075)     (930)     (728)
                                            -------   -------   -------
Common shares - basic (average)              12,698    12,400    12,263
Options:  common equivalents                    674       679       526
Warrants: common equivalents                     19        --         8
                                            -------   -------   -------
Common shares - diluted (average)            13,391    13,079    12,797
                                            =======   =======   =======
 
</TABLE>
*Note:  The Company did not have any outstanding preferred stock for the periods
ending December 31, 1996 through 1998.
**CERTIFICATION        OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**AND        CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT        TO**

**18        U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|                                    |                                                                                                               |                                                  |
|-----------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------|
|                                    |                                                                                                               |
|                               |                                                                                                          |                                             |
| Date: August              14, 2006 |                                                                                                               | /s/ Barry              B.              Goldstein |
|                                    | Barry                B. Goldstein,Chief                Executive Officer andChief                Financial Officer |
|                                    |                                                                                                               |
### §6210. Suspension and termination

#### (a) Finding of Secretary

If the Secretary finds that an order issued under section 6203(a) of this title, or a provision of such order, obstructs or does not tend to effectuate the purposes of this chapter, the Secretary shall terminate or suspend the operation of such order or provision.

#### (b) Periodic referenda

The Secretary may periodically conduct a referendum to determine if lime producers, producer-handlers, and importers favor the continuation, termination, or suspension of any order issued under section 6203(a) of this title and in effect at the time of such referendum.

#### (c) Required referenda

The Secretary shall hold a referendum under subsection (b)—

(1) at the request of the Board; or

(2) if not less than 10 percent of the lime producers, producer-handlers, and importers subject to assessment under this chapter submit a petition requesting such a referendum.

#### (d) Limitation

The termination or suspension of any order, or any provision thereof, shall not be considered an order within the meaning of this chapter.

#### (e) Vote

The Secretary shall suspend or terminate the order at the end of the marketing year if the Secretary determines that—

(1) the suspension or termination of the order is favored by not less than a majority of those persons voting in a referendum under subsection (b); and

(2) the producers, producer-handlers, and importers comprising this majority produce and import more than 50 percent of the volume of limes produced and imported by those voting in the referendum.

(Pub. L. 101–624, title XIX, §1961, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 3880.)
§ 750.48 Measure of damages in injury or death cases. ( a ) Where an injury or death arises within the United States or its territories, commonwealth, or possessions, determine the measure of damages under the law of the location where the injury arises.
( b ) Where an injury or death arises in a foreign country and is otherwise cognizable and meritorious under this provision, damages will be determined in accordance with general principles of American tort law. The following is provided as guidance. ( 1 ) *Measure of damages for overseas personal injury claims.* Allowable compensation includes reasonable medical and hospital expenses necessarily incurred, compensation for lost earnings and services, diminution of earning capacity, anticipated medical expenses, physical disfigurement, and pain and suffering.
( 2 ) *Wrongful death claims arising in foreign countries.* ( i ) Allowable compensation includes that in paragraph (b)(1) of this section, burial expenses, loss of support and services, loss of companionship, comfort, society, protection, and consortium, and loss of training, guidance, education, and nurturing, as applicable.
( ii ) The claim may be presented by or on behalf of the decedent's spouse, parent, child, or dependent relative. Claims may be consolidated for joint presentation by a representative of some or all of the beneficiaries or may be filed by a proper beneficiary individually.
Case: 1:12-cv-00033 Document #: 23-2 Filed: 04/16/12 Page 1 of 14 PageID #:127
Case: 1:12-cv-00033 Document #: 23-2 Filed: 04/16/12 Page 2 of 14 PageID #:128
Case: 1:12-cv-00033 Document #: 23-2 Filed: 04/16/12 Page 3 of 14 PageID #:129
Case: 1:12-cv-00033 Document #: 23-2 Filed: 04/16/12 Page 4 of 14 PageID #:130
Case: 1:12-cv-00033 Document #: 23-2 Filed: 04/16/12 Page 5 of 14 PageID #:131
Case: 1:12-cv-00033 Document #: 23-2 Filed: 04/16/12 Page 6 of 14 PageID #:132
Case: 1:12-cv-00033 Document #: 23-2 Filed: 04/16/12 Page 7 of 14 PageID #:133
Case: 1:12-cv-00033 Document #: 23-2 Filed: 04/16/12 Page 8 of 14 PageID #:134
Case: 1:12-cv-00033 Document #: 23-2 Filed: 04/16/12 Page 9 of 14 PageID #:135
Case: 1:12-cv-00033 Document #: 23-2 Filed: 04/16/12 Page 10 of 14 PageID #:136
Case: 1:12-cv-00033 Document #: 23-2 Filed: 04/16/12 Page 11 of 14 PageID #:137
Case: 1:12-cv-00033 Document #: 23-2 Filed: 04/16/12 Page 12 of 14 PageID #:138
Case: 1:12-cv-00033 Document #: 23-2 Filed: 04/16/12 Page 13 of 14 PageID #:139
Case: 1:12-cv-00033 Document #: 23-2 Filed: 04/16/12 Page 14 of 14 PageID #:140
#### Norma Schwam, Respondent, v. Bernard Schwam, Appellant.

In an action for a judgment declaring plaintiff to be the lawful wife of the defendant and granting her a judicial separation, defendant appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated October 18, 1960, as directs him to pay to plaintiff, by way of an interim allowance, the sum of $400 a week *“*on account of any alimony to be awarded ” by the trial court; and as directs him to pay the sum of $3,500 *“*on account of counsel fees to be awarded” by the trial court; the plaintiff’s application for alimony *pendente lite*and for counsel fees having been referred by said order to the Trial Justice. Order modified by reducing the amount directed to be paid on account of counsel fees from $3,500 to $1,500 (such reduced amount already having been paid pursuant to an order of this court dated November 14, 1960). As so modified, order, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, without costs. In our opinion, the amount awarded as an interim counsel fee was excessive under the circumstances disclosed by the record, and in view of the reference of the motion and the question of counsel fees to the trial court for determination. Our affirmance of the order, as modified, is not to be taken as an indication that the order-appealed from, insofar as it makes interim awards of temporary alimony and counsel fee on account of the awards thereafter to be made by the trial court, requires that any additional allowances for temporary alimony and for counsel fees shall be or must be made by the trial court. The determination by the Trial Justice as to the amount of alimony and counsel fee should be made by him in the exercise of a sound judicial discretion, upon the basis of all the evidence adduced at the trial; and the interim awards theretofore made should have no effect upon that determination. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Ughetta, Kleinfeld and Pette, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 23 - CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS




We  consent  to the incorporation by reference (1) in the Registration
Statements (Form S-8 No. 33-34906, Form S-8 No. 33-43102 and Form  S-8
No.  33-84094) pertaining to the Provident Financial Group, Inc.  1988
Stock  Option  Plan,  (2) in Post-Effective Amendment  No.  1  to  the
Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-34904) pertaining to the  1990
Provident Financial Group, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan,  (3)  in
the  Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-90792) pertaining to  the
Provident   Financial  Group,  Inc.  Retirement  Plan,  (4)   in   the
Registration  Statements  (Form S-8 No.  33-51230  and  No.  33-62707)
pertaining  to the 1992 Outside Directors' Stock Option Plan  and  the
1992 Advisory Directors' Stock Option Plan and (5) in the Registration
Statement   (Form  S-8  No.  33-61576)  pertaining  to  the  Provident
Financial  Group, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan of our report  dated
January  13, 1998, except Note R, as to which the date is January  19,
1999,  with  respect  to  the  consolidated  financial  statements  of
Provident Financial Group, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-
K) for the year ended December 31, 1997.



                                                     ERNST & YOUNG LLP


Cincinnati, Ohio
March 26, 1998, except for Note R, as to
which the date is January 19, 1999
### §6111. Authorization of appropriations

#### (a) In general

There are authorized to be appropriated for each fiscal year such sums as are necessary to carry out this chapter.

#### (b) Administrative expenses

The funds so appropriated shall not be available for payment of the expenses or expenditures of the Council in administering any provision of an order issued under this chapter.

(Pub. L. 101–624, title XIX, §1932, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 3865.)
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6975

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

DAMON EMANUEL ELLIOTT,

Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, Senior District 

Judge. (8:97-cr-00053-PJM-1; 8:10-cv-01526-PJM)

Submitted: September 30, 2010 Decided: October 12, 2010

Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Damon Emanuel Elliott, Appellant Pro Se. Stuart A. Berman, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Damon Emanuel Elliott seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order dismissing his “Motion to Review Sentence” as a 

successive 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2010) motion. The 

order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues 

a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006). 

A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a 

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the district court denies 

relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by 

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the 

district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is 

debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 

(2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). 

When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the 

prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural 

ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable 

claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. 

at 484-85. We have independently reviewed the record and 

conclude that Elliott has not made the requisite showing. 

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss 

the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 
3

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

DISMISSED
#### Mary E. Proctor, plaintiff in error, v. S. B. Chapin et al., defendants in error.

Gen. No. 29,436.

Action for money had and received for investment by defendant *625stockbrokers. Judgment in plaintiff’s favor for small amount, entered over plaintiff’s objection upon a directed verdict. Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. George B. Holmes, Judge, presiding. Heard in the second division of this court for the first district at the October term, 1924.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed March 3, 1925.

Edward H. Morris and James B. Cashin, for plaintiff in error.

Custer & Cameron and Thomas B. Lantry, for defendants in error.

Mr. Presiding Justice Fitch

delivered the opinion of the court.
Case: 1:12-cv-00004 Document #: 1-4 Filed: 01/03/12 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:129
Case: 1:12-cv-00004 Document #: 1-4 Filed: 01/03/12 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:130