alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 752.3 Claims against the Navy. ( a ) *Settlement authority.* 10 U.S.C. 7622 provides settlement authority for damage caused by a vessel in the naval service or by other property under the jurisdiction of the Department of the Navy; compensation for towage or salvage service, including contract salvage, rendered to a vessel in the naval service or to other property of the Navy; or damage caused by a maritime tort committed by any agent or employee of the Department of the Navy or by property under the jurisdiction of the Department of the Navy. The limit on the Secretary's settlement authority is payment of $15,000,000. A claim which is settled for an amount over $15,000,000 is certified to Congress for payment. Section 7622 provides that the Secretary may delegate his settlement authority in matters where the amount to be paid is not over $1,000,000. Under the Secretary's delegation, settlements not exceeding $500,000 may be effected by the Judge Advocate General. Under the Secretary's delegation, settlements not exceeding $250,000 may be effected by the Deputy Assistant Judge Advocate General (Admiralty and Maritime Law).
( b ) *Settlement is final.* The legislation specifically authorizes the Secretary to settle, compromise, and pay claims. The settlement, upon acceptance of payment by the claimant, is final and conclusive for all purposes.
( c ) *Settlement procedures.* Where the amount paid is over $500,000, after agreement is reached with counsel or claimants, the procedure is to prepare a settlement recommendation for the approval of the Secretary of the Navy. When settlement has been approved, the voucher required for effecting payment is prepared. The settlement check is then exchanged, in keeping with the commercial practice, for an executed release. In some situations, where the exchange of documents is impracticable, a claimant is requested to forward the executed release by mail, on the understanding that the release does not become effective until the check is received in payment. Claims settled under 10 U.S.C. 7622 are paid out of annual Department of Defense appropriations.
( d ) *Limitation period.* The Secretary's settlement authorization is subject to a two-year limitation. This limitation is not extended by the filing of claim nor by negotiations or correspondence. A settlement agreement must be reached before the end of the two-year period. If settlement is not accomplished, then the claimant must file suit under the appropriate statute to avoid the limitation bar. The agreement reached in negotiations must receive the approval of the Secretary of the Navy or his designee, depending on the amount involved, prior to the expiration of the two-year period.
( e ) *Matters in litigation.* When suit is filed, the matter comes within the cognizance of the Department of Justice, and the Secretary of the Navy is no longer able to entertain a claim or to make administrative settlement.
[39 FR 9962, Mar. 15, 1974, as amended at 55 FR 12173, Apr. 2, 1990; 65 FR 60861, 60862, Oct. 13, 2000; 69 FR 20542, Apr. 16, 2004; 72 FR 56268, Oct. 3, 2007]
##### 



EXHIBIT 10.4
 EMS Technologies, Inc.660 Engineering DrivePO Box 7700Norcross, GA 30091-7700Tel: (770) 263-9200www.ems-t.com
  
   Salary:
 2006 Incentive Compensation:
 Vacation Pay & Termination Date:
 Benefits:




---



##### 



Page Two
Mr. Al Hansen
June 2, 2006
  Retirement & Stock Purchase Plans:
  Stock Options:
 Non-Competition:
 Participation in Certain Organizations:




---



##### 



Page Three
Mr. Al Hansen
June 2, 2006
 Other Agreements:
    EMS Technologies, Inc.
### §27e. Repealed. Pub. L. 111–203, title VII, §725(g)(1)(A), July 21, 2010, 124 Stat. 1694

Section, Pub. L. 106–554, §1(a)(5) [title IV, §407], Dec. 21, 2000, 114 Stat. 2763, 2763A–461, related to exclusion of covered swap agreements.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective on the later of 360 days after July 21, 2010, or, to the extent a provision of subtitle A (§§711–754) of title VII of Pub. L. 111–203 requires a rulemaking, not less than 60 days after publication of the final rule or regulation implementing such provision of subtitle A, see section 754 of Pub. L. 111–203, set out as an Effective Date of 2010 Amendment note under section 1a of this title.
---

---

EXHIBIT 13.2

# CERTIFICATION

(Certification of CEO of the Registrant pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

In connection with the Annual Report
of Scitex Corporation Ltd. (the Company) on Form 20-F/A for the period ending
December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Annual Report), I, Yahel Shachar, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.       
          The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
          of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       
          The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: September 20, 2005

| |  | /s/ Yahel Shachar
Yahel ShacharChief Financial Officer
| |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------



---

---
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1405 

Recognizing the 165th anniversary of the peaceful resolution of the Pig 

War crisis. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

AUGUST 2, 2024 

Mr. LARSEN of Washington (for himself, Mr. SMITH of Washington, Ms. 

PEREZ, and Ms. DELBENE) submitted the following resolution; which 

was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the 165th anniversary of the peaceful resolution 

of the Pig War crisis. 

Whereas, for more than 40 years, Great Britain and the 

United States contended over the Oregon Country, which 

today comprises Washington, Oregon, and Idaho, as well 

as portions of Montana and Wyoming and the Province 

of British Columbia; 

Whereas, on June 15, 1846, the two countries agreed upon 

the 49th parallel as the international boundary, but could 

not agree on a water boundary between Vancouver Island 

and the mainland, where the San Juan Islands lie; 

Whereas tensions over possession of the islands escalated to 

crisis proportions on San Juan Island when on June 15, 

1859, a United States farmer shot and killed a pig beVerDate Sep 11 2014 01:25 Aug 03, 2024 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6300 E:\BILLS\HR1405.IH HR1405

kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HRES 1405 IH 

longing to the Hudson’s Bay Company, prompting dispatch of naval and military forces from both countries to 

the island’s southern shore; 

Whereas the crisis was resolved peacefully through a combination of restraint and diplomacy when United States 

Army Commander Lieutenant General Winfield Scott arrived from Washington, DC, to negotiate a standdown 

with British Columbia Governor James Douglas; 

Whereas the ensuing 12-year, peaceful joint military occupation of San Juan Island challenged United States soldiers 

and British Royal Marines to cope with the difficulty of 

1860s military life in an isolated environment, yet formed 

a lasting friendship between the two garrisons; 

Whereas, in 1872, the boundary question was settled in favor 

of the United States through arbitration by Kaiser Wilhelm I of Germany, which brought a lasting peace on the 

49th parallel between Great Britain, Canada, and the 

United States; 

Whereas San Juan Island National Historical Park was created in 1966 to commemorate the peaceful settlement of 

the Pig War crisis and celebrate the idea that individuals 

and nations can resolve their differences peacefully without resorting to violence; and 

Whereas diplomats and members of the military from the 

United States and the United Kingdom continue to serve 

their countries side by side in remote regions of the 

world: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives honors 

2 the 165th anniversary of the peaceful resolution of the Pig 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HRES 1405 IH 

1 War crisis and applauds the close ties and lasting friend2 ship between the United Kingdom and the United States. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          15,002
<SECURITIES>                                     4,050
<RECEIVABLES>                                   18,232
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,580
<INVENTORY>                                     27,517
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                72,699
<PP&E>                                           7,989
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,166
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  82,633
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           32,276
<BONDS>                                         20,750
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      9,000
<COMMON>                                           403
<OTHER-SE>                                      19,803
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    82,633
<SALES>                                        101,656
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               101,656
<CGS>                                           96,536
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   96,536
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                13,513
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   550
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,657
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (10,600)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       166
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (10,766)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (10,766)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.28)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.28)
        

</TABLE>
### §4319. Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated out of any money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated such funds as are necessary to carry out the provisions of this chapter. The funds so appropriated shall not be available for payment of the expenses or expenditures of the Floraboard in administering any provisions of any order issued pursuant to the terms of this chapter.

(Pub. L. 97–98, title XVII, §1720, Dec. 22, 1981, 95 Stat. 1358.)
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsEvaluation of organic carbon analyzers for space applicationThe state-of-the-art technology for organic carbon analysis in space applications is evaluated. An investigation into total organic carbon (TOC) analysis has identified a variety of schemes which include different methods for: (1) separation of inorganic carbon from organic carbon and/or differentiation of inorganic carbon from organic carbon; (2) reaction of organic carbon to form a quantifiable species; and (3) detection and measurement of that species. Each method option is discussed.Document ID19840010539Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)Date AcquiredSeptember 4, 2013Publication DateFebruary 1, 1984Subject CategoryInstrumentation And PhotographyReport/Patent NumberNASA-CR-171755NAS 1.26:171755Accession Number84N18607Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS9-16675Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19840010539.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,058
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0<F1>
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,093
<PP&E>                                           1,682
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0<F1>
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   2,890
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              464
<BONDS>                                            882
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        350
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                         850
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     2,890
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   356
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      189
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  71
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    155
<INCOME-TAX>                                        60
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 95
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        95
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00
<FN>
<F1>Not separately identified in the consolidated financial statements or
accompanying notes thereto.
</FN>


</TABLE>
Social Media Use in the Financial Aid Community

Please complete the following survey on Social Media use in the financial aid community. Your responses are 

extremely valuable as the Department continues to investigate opportunities to connect with our 

constituents through new technologies. We appreciate your input.

1) What social media tools do you actively use at your institution to perform any of your day to day 

duties? Please check all that apply.

___ Twitter

___ Facebook

___ You Tube

___ Wikis

___ Blogs

___ Texting

___ Mobile applications for cell phones

___ Other (please specify)

___ Do not use or do not have access

2) Which of these social media tools does your institution use to specifically engage and interact with 

students? Please check all that apply.

___ Twitter

___ Facebook

___ You Tube

___ Wikis

___ Blogs

___ Texting

___ Mobile applications for cell phones

___ Other (please specify)

___ Do not use or do not have access
3) Do you use any of the following social media tools on a regular basis in your personal life? Please 

check all that apply.

___ Twitter

___ Facebook

___ You Tube

___ Wikis

___ Blogs

___ Texting

___ Mobile applications for cell phones

___ Other (please specify)

___ Do not use or do not have access

4) Please indicate your age range:

___ 18 – 34

___ 35 – 50

___ 51 – 65

___ Over 65

What are some of the unique ways you are using social media both internally and externally?

What recommendations would you give Federal Student Aid in utilizing these tools to improve the 

customer experience for you, parents and students?
#### Howard Donnelly, Plaintiff, v. Rochester Gas and Electric *Corporation*et al., Defendants. Rochester Gas and Electric Corporation, Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Richard J. Tanner et al., Doing Business as R. E. Tanner Line Construction Co., Third-Party Defendants-Respond*741ents. Philip R. Kennard, Plaintiff, v. Rochester Gas and Electric Corporation et al., Defendants. Rochester Gas and Electric Corporation, Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Richard J. Tanner et al., Doing Business as R. E. Tanner Line Construction Co., Third-Party Defendants-Respondents.

Order unanimously reversed, without costs, and motion denied, without costs. Memorandum: It is not clear that the plaintiff cannot recover from the defendant Rochester Gas and Electric Corporation on the basis of passive negligence. That being so, the second cause of action in the third-party complaint was improperly dismissed as insufficient in law. This is particularly so when the cause of action which was dismissed is viewed in the light of 3013 and subdivision (a) of 3017 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules. (See, also, 3 Weinstein-Korn-Miller, N. Y. Civ. Prac., par. 3013.03; also *Foley*v. *D’Agostino,*21 A D 2d 60.) (Appeal by third-party plaintiff from order of Monroe Special Term granting third-party defendant’s motion to dismiss second cause of action.) Present—Williams, P. J., Bastow, Goldman, Henry and Del Yecchio, JJ.
EXHIBIT 23

            Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Forms S-3, No. 333-15533, 33-58736, 33-60229, 33-78760, 33-72170, 33-68542) and
(Forms S-8 No. 33-45348,  33-75466,  33-88826,  333-87153 and 333-89308) of Enzo
Biochem, Inc. and in the related Prospectus of our report dated October 7, 2004,
except  for Note 14 and the third  paragraph  of Note 7, as to which the date is
October 14,  2004 with  respect to the  consolidated  financial  statements  and
schedule of Enzo  Biochem,  Inc.  included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for
the fiscal year ended July 31, 2004.



                                                  /s/  Ernst & Young LLP





Melville, New York
October 14, 2004
### §2204–1. Delegation of regulatory functions of Secretary of Agriculture; definitions

As used in sections 2204–1 to 2204–5 of this title—

(a) The term "regulatory order" means an order, marketing agreement, standard, permit, license, registration, suspension or revocation of a permit, license, or registration, certificate, award, rule or regulation, if it has the force and effect of law, and if it may be made, prescribed, issued, or promulgated only after notice and hearing or opportunity for hearing have been given.

(b) The term "regulatory function" means the making, prescribing, issuing, or promulgating of a regulatory order; and includes (1) determining whether such making, prescribing, issuing, or promulgating is authorized or required by law, and (2) any action which is required or authorized to be performed before, after, or in connection with, such determining, making, prescribing, issuing, or promulgating.

(Apr. 4, 1940, ch. 75, §1, 54 Stat. 81.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 450c of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section, and to section 516a of Title 5 prior to the general revision and enactment of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees, by Pub. L. 89–554, §1, Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 378.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-41185 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus CARDELL FITZGERALD ROBERTS, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:93-CR-161-1

- - - - - - - - - - June 17, 1998 Before DAVIS, PARKER, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Cardell Fitzgerald Roberts appeals from the denial of his motion, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2), to reduce the term of imprisonment imposed upon him. Roberts was sentenced to 200 months’ imprisonment and six years’ supervised release, after pleading guilty to one count of possession with intent to distribute cocaine base within 1,000 feet of a public school, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 860. As the decision to grant a § 3582(c)(2) motion is discretionary, we review theNo. 97-41185 -2- district court’s ruling for an abuse of discretion. United States v. Pardue , 36 F.3d 429, 430 (5th Cir. 1994). Roberts argues that his sentence should be reduced, in light of U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Amendment 506 and United States v.
LaBonte , 117 S. Ct. 1673 (1997), because he claims that application of Amendment 506 to his sentence would result in a reduced term of imprisonment. See U.S.S.G. App. C amend. 506. However, in LaBonte , the U.S. Supreme Court determined that Amendment 506 was inconsistent with, and was therefore invalidated by, 28 U.S.C. § 994(h). 117 S. Ct. at 1677-79. Accordingly, as Robert relies upon Amendment 506 as the basis for the reduction of his sentence, his motion was properly denied. Roberts also argues that a § 841(a) violation is a lesser-included offense of § 860, and, therefore, his conviction for both offenses must be vacated as it is in violation of the Double Jeopardy Clause. This argument is not cognizable in a § 3582(c)(2) motion, nor in an appeal from the denial of a § 3582(c)(2) motion. See Pardue , 36 F.3d at 430 (“A § 3582(c)(2) motion applies only to guideline amendments that operate retroactively, as listed in the policy statement, U.S.S.G. § 1B1.10(d).”) Even if we were to consider this argument, because Roberts was convicted and sentenced only for a single offense, there was no violation of the Double Jeopardy Clause.
See United States v. Anderson , 987 F.2d 251, 254 (5th Cir.No. 97-41185 -3- 1993)(Double Jeopardy Clause violated if defendant receives multiple convictions and sentences for single act). As Roberts’ arguments are without arguable merit, his appeal is DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS. Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983); 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Office of the Under Secretary Organizational Chart- eff 6/19/2022

Office of the Under Secretary
#### 1001.101 Purpose.

This subpart establishes Chapter 10, the Department of the Treasury Acquisition Regulation (DTAR), within Title 48 of the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) System. The DTAR contains policies and procedures that supplement FAR coverage and directly affect the contractual relationship between the Department of the Treasury and its business partners (e.g., prospective offerors/bidders and contractors). When FAR coverage is adequate, there will be no corresponding DTAR coverage.
### SUBCHAPTER III—RETIREMENT OF EMPLOYEES