alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THE SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE
EQUITY  OIL  COMPANY  FORM  10-Q FOR THE  PERIOD  ENDED  MARCH  31,  2000 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                              MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                      1,937,659
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                               3,593,923
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            6,202,679
<PP&E>                                    103,920,643
<DEPRECIATION>                             63,752,091
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             46,849,569
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       1,935,849
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                   12,808,040
<OTHER-SE>                                  3,719,743
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               46,849,569
<SALES>                                     5,388,023
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            6,138,931
<CGS>                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               3,811,735
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            339,446
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             1,987,750
<INCOME-TAX>                                  735,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         1,252,750
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                1,252,750
<EPS-BASIC>                                     .10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .10



</TABLE>
|   | (1)                               |   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                |
|--------|-----------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                              |
|   | (2)                               |   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|   |                              |   |                                                                                                                                                 |   |
|   |                              |   |
|   | /s/ Frank W. Barker, Jr.          |   |
|   | Frank W. Barker, Jr          |   |
|   | Principal Financial Officer  |   |
|   | February 3, 2012                  |   |
|   |
### §324. Time, manner, etc., of annual payments

The sums appropriated by this subchapter to the States and Territories for the further endowment and support of colleges shall be annually paid on or before the 31st day of October of each year, by the Secretary of the Treasury, upon the warrant of the Secretary of Agriculture, out of the Treasury of the United States, to the State or Territorial treasurer, or to such officer as shall be designated by the laws of such State or Territory to receive the same, who shall, upon the order of the trustees of the college, or the institution for colored students, immediately pay over said sums to the treasurers of the respective colleges or other institutions entitled to receive the same, and such treasurers shall be required to report to the Secretary of Agriculture, on or before the 1st day of December of each year, a detailed statement of the amount so received and of its disbursement. The grants of moneys authorized by this subchapter are made subject to the legislative assent of the several States and Territories to the purpose of said grants.

(Aug. 30, 1890, ch. 841, §2, 26 Stat. 418; 1939 Reorg. Plan No. I, §§201, 204, eff. July 1, 1939, 4 F.R. 2728, 53 Stat. 1424; 1953 Reorg. Plan No. 1, §§5, 8, eff. Apr. 11, 1953, 18 F.R. 2053, 67 Stat. 631; Pub. L. 94–273, §9(1), Apr. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 378; Pub. L. 96–88, title III, §301(a)(2)(E), Oct. 17, 1979, 93 Stat. 677; Pub. L. 97–98, title XIV, §1419, Dec. 22, 1981, 95 Stat. 1306.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1976—Pub. L. 94–273 substituted "October" for "July" and "December" for "September".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of functions under this section to Secretary of Agriculture, see note set out under section 321 of this title.

Functions of Department of Health, Education, and Welfare and Secretary thereof under this subchapter transferred to Secretary of Education by section 301(a)(2)(E) of Pub. L. 96–88, which is classified to section 3441(a)(2)(E) of Title 20, Education.

Transfer of functions from Secretary of the Interior to Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare, see note set out under section 321 of this title.
#### Mary Atwood et al. *v.*Regional School District No. 15 et al.

*Thomas L. Brayton,*for the appellee (named defendant).

*Kenneth II. Murray,*for the appellants (plaintiffs).

Argued October 1

decided October 2, 1974

The motion by the named defendant to dismiss the appeal from the Superior Court in the judicial district of Waterbury is denied.
#### § 651.25 Notice of availability.

The Notice of Availability (NOA) is published by the Army to inform the public and others that a NEPA document is available for review. A NOA will be published in the FR, coordinating with EPA for draft and final EISs (including supplements), for RODs, and for EAs and FNSIs which are of national concern, are unprecedented, or normally require an EIS. EAs and FNSIs of local concern will be made available in accordance with § 651.36. This agency NOA should not be confused with the EPA's notice of availability of weekly receipts (NWR)[3] of EISs.

###### Footnotes -
  651.25

[3] This notice is published by the EPA and officially begins the public review period. The NWR is published each Friday, and lists the EISs that were filed the previous week.
1201.105-1 Publication and code arrangement. ( a ) The TAR is published or available in— ( 1 ) The Federal Register;
( 2 ) Cumulative form in the CFR; and
( 3 ) Online via the internet at *https://www.acquisition.gov/tar .*
( b ) The TAR is issued as this chapter.
EXHIBIT 23 - CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS




We  consent  to the incorporation by reference (1) in the Registration
Statements (Form S-8 No. 33-34906, Form S-8 No. 33-43102 and Form  S-8
No.  33-84094) pertaining to the Provident Financial Group, Inc.  1988
Stock  Option  Plan,  (2) in Post-Effective Amendment  No.  1  to  the
Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-34904) pertaining to the  1990
Provident Financial Group, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan,  (3)  in
the  Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-90792) pertaining to  the
Provident   Financial  Group,  Inc.  Retirement  Plan,  (4)   in   the
Registration  Statements  (Form S-8 No.  33-51230  and  No.  33-62707)
pertaining  to the 1992 Outside Directors' Stock Option Plan  and  the
1992 Advisory Directors' Stock Option Plan and (5) in the Registration
Statement   (Form  S-8  No.  33-61576)  pertaining  to  the  Provident
Financial  Group, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan of our report  dated
January   19,  1999,  with  respect  to  the  consolidated   financial
statements  of Provident Financial Group, Inc. included in the  Annual
Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1998.





                                                 /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP






Cincinnati, Ohio
March 29, 1999
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

NICHOLAS MARTIN, individually and on

behalf of all others similarly situated,

Plaintiffs,

v.

DUN & BRADSTREET, INC., and

CONVERGYS CUSTOMER

MANAGEMENT GROUP, INC.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.12-cv-215

DUN & BRADSTREET INC.'S FRCP 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT AND

LOCAL RULE 3.2 NOTIFICATION AS TO AFFILIATES

Defendant, Dun & Bradsteet, Inc. ("D&B"), by its attorneys Ice Miller LLP, hereby submits

its Corporate Disclosure Statement pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 7.1 and its Notification as to

Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 of the Northern District of Illinois.

A. FRCP 7.1 DISCLOSURE

Defendant D&B is a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Dun & Bradstreet Corporation. No

publicly-held corporation owns 10% or more of The Dun & Bradstreet Corporation’s stock.

B. L.R. 3.2 NOTIFICATION AS TO AFFILIATES

Defendant D&B is a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Dun & Bradstreet Corporation.

Respectfully submitted,

DUN & BRADSTREET, INC.

By: /s/ Isaac J. Colunga

One of its Attorneys

Bart T. Murphy

Thomas Hayes

Isaac J. Colunga

ICE MILLER LLP

2300 Cabot Dr., Suite 455

Lisle, Illinois 60532

630-955-6124

Case: 1:12-cv-00215 Document #: 22 Filed: 02/17/12 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:53
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned, an attorney, states that on February 17, 2012, he caused the foregoing to

be filed with the Clerk of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, and a

copy of which will be served on all counsel of record by the Clerk's ECF/CM system:

Alexander H. Burke aburke@burkelawllc.com

s/Isaac J. Colunga ___

Isaac J. Colunga

ICE MILLER LLP

2300 Cabot Dr., Suite 455

Lisle, Illinois 60532

630-955-6124

C/131464.1

Case: 1:12-cv-00215 Document #: 22 Filed: 02/17/12 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:54
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER>       1
       
<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       Mar-02-1996
<PERIOD-START>                          Feb-26-1995
<PERIOD-END>                            Nov-25-1995
<CASH>                                    1,600,000
<SECURITIES>                                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                            18,451,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                      0
<INVENTORY>                              27,918,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         48,419,000
<PP&E>                                   23,208,000
<DEPRECIATION>                           12,703,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           62,463,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    36,522,000
<BONDS>                                           0
<COMMON>                                  1,267,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                               15,483,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             62,463,000
<SALES>                                  43,333,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         54,324,000
<CGS>                                    27,947,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            36,333,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            (5,000)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        1,016,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         (4,794,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     (4,794,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                            (4,794,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   .97
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   .97

        

</TABLE>
### **CHAPTER 10—ALIEN REGISTRATION**
* Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions

that have no precedential value and merely decide particular cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-30083 Conference Calendar

__________________ WARREN S. MURPHY, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus CHARLES C. FOTI, Sheriff, Orleans Parish, JOHN LACOUR, Warden, and WILLIAM SHORT, Warden, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. CA-94-3177-I-4

- - - - - - - - - - June 29, 1995 Before JONES, WIENER, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Warren S. Murphy's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) is hereby DENIED. Murphy appeals the entry of judgment for the defendants in his civil rights action. Use of restraining devices by prison officials "constitute[s] a rational security measure and cannot be considered cruel and unusual punishment unless great discomfort is occasioned deliberately as punishment or mindlessly, withNo. 95-30083 -2-
indifference to the prisoner's humanity." Jackson v. Cain , 864 F.2d 1235, 1243 (5th Cir. 1989). This court recognizes that shackles and restraints are justified by escape risks. Id . at 1243-44; Fulford v. King, 692 F.2d 11, 14 (5th Cir. 1982). Additionally, "the Eighth Amendment does not require `that the state use the best means available for confining its prisoners.'" Jackson , 864 F.2d at 1243 (quoting Fulford , 692 F.2d at 14 n.7). Orleans Parish Prison (OPP) officials legitimately determined that Murphy posed a risk of escape. They were justified in using shackles to restrain Murphy. The magistrate judge found that the shackles did not prohibit Murphy from moving about his cell. Murphy does not challenge the magistrate judge's findings. Under the circumstances, the use of shackles did not constitute mindless imposition of punishment. Nor did it demonstrate indifference to Murphy's humanity. See Jackson , 864 F.2d at 1243. Whether OPP officials could have used leather restraints rather than leg irons is irrelevant. They need not have used the most comfortable or least restrictive means available. Id . Because Murphy raises no nonfrivolous issues for appeal, his appeal is
DISMISSED.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-1631

NANCY WRIGHT DORSEY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

RUTHERFORD COUNTY; RUTHERFORD COUNTY BOARD OF

COMMISSIONERS; TONY HELTON; ROBERT LUCKADOO;

DANNY DANIELS; FRANKLIN GOODE; ADEN LYNCH, in

their capacity as Rutherford County Commissioners; DANIEL J. GOOD, in his capacity as

Sheriff of Rutherford County; RUTHERFORD

COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Shelby. Lacy H. Thornburg, District

Judge. (CA-96-94-4)

Submitted: August 14, 1997 Decided: August 20, 1997

Before NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge, and BUTZNER and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Nancy Wright Dorsey, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Lee Rainey, G.

Michael Barnhill, WOMBLE, CARLYLE, SANDRIDGE & RICE, Charlotte,

North Carolina, for Appellees.
2

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's adverse grant of summary judgment in her civil suit alleging employment discrimination

and intentional deprivations of her constitutional rights in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42

U.S.C. § 2000e (1994), 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981, 1983 (1994). We have

reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. Dorsey v. Rutherford County, No. CA-96-94-4

(W.D.N.C. Mar. 26, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit
        32.2
 
 **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF**
 **THE
        SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 In
          connection with the Composite Technology Corporation (the "Company") Annual
          Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended September 30, 2007 as filed with
          the
          Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
          Domonic
          J. Carney, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
          18
          U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
 Section
          906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
          The
          Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
          the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
 
 (2)
          The
          information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material respects
          the
          financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 */s/
                    Domonic J. Carney*
                  
                  *Domonic
                    J. Carney*
                  *Chief
                    Financial Officer*
                  *(Principal
                    Financial and Accounting Officer)*
                  
                  *Date:
                    June 4, 2008*
<PAGE>
 
                                                                     EXHIBIT 24
 
                               POWER OF ATTORNEY
 
  The Undersigned, a Director of General Re Corporation, a Delaware
Corporation (the "Corporation"), Hereby Designates each of Charles F. Barr and
Robert D. Graham as his attorney in fact to execute on his behalf, as a
Director of General Re, General Re's Annual Report on Form 10-K under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
 
                                          -------------------------------------
                                          Original powers of attorney in this
                                          form signed by each of the
                                          following:
 
                                          Lucy Wilson Benson
                                          Walter M. Cabot
                                          William C. Ferguson
                                          Donald J. Kirk
                                          Kay Koplovitz
                                          Andrew W. Mathieson
                                          Martin G. McGuinn
                                          David E. McKinney
                                          Stephen A. Ross
                                          Walter F. Williams
 
Dated as of February 11, 1998.
MEMORANDUM

TO: Assistant Inspector General for Audit

Assistant Inspector General for Evaluation, Inspection

and Management Services

Assistant Inspector General for Investigation

Assistant Inspector General for Information Technology Audit

and Computer Crime Investigations

Counsel to the Inspector General

FROM: Inspector General

SUBJECT: Delegation of Authority to Sign and Issue Inspector General's Subpoenas

I. DELEGATION

Under the authority vested in me by Section 3(a) of the Inspector General Act of 

1978, as amended (the Act), 5 U.S.C. Appendix 3, I hereby delegate to you, your 

successor in function, and anyone serving for you in an acting capacity, the 

authority under Section 6(a)(4) of the Act to issue Inspector General's subpoenas

in furtherance of the duties and functions of the Office of Inspector General 

(OIG).

Unless otherwise noted in future delegations of authority, amendments to the 

authorities delegated herein are included within the scope of this delegation.

II. RESERVATIONS

None.

III. REDELEGATION

You may redelegate this authority to OIG supervisors. No further redelegation is 

authorized.
Page 2 – Delegation of Authority

IV. CERTIFICATION AND EFFECTIVE DATE

This delegation is effective upon certification by the Department's Principal 

Delegation Control Officer, and supersedes delegations EF/EFI/112, EF/EFA/126 

and EF/EFA/127. I hereby ratify actions within the scope of this delegation taken 

by you prior to certification of this delegation.

_________/s/_____________ 

 John P. Higgins, Jr.

OGC Clearance and Date: /s/ David Berthiaume, 7/13/2004

Certified Date: 7/23/2004

Departmental Delegations Control Officer: /s/ Naty G. Beetle

Control Number: EF/EF/150
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-04-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-01-2000
<CASH>                                          14,537
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,092
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (51)
<INVENTORY>                                      4,515
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                32,076
<PP&E>                                          32,220
<DEPRECIATION>                                (10,615)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  71,768
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           18,821
<BONDS>                                         97,475
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            14
<OTHER-SE>                                    (53,720)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    71,768
<SALES>                                         54,607
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                54,607
<CGS>                                           39,794
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   39,794
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,073
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    11
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              11,333
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,859)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,525)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,334)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,334)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (17.226)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (17.226)


</TABLE>
#### Frances Harrison *v.*Calvin Harrison

*John T. Cummiskey, Jr.,*in support of the motion.

Submitted September 18

decided October 2, 1974

The plaintiff’s motion for a review by this court of the trial court’s order terminating a stay of execution in the appeal from the Superior Court in New Haven County is granted and the relief sought therein is denied.