alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         January 7, 2021.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 28, 2020, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & First-Class Package Service Contract 186 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2021-57, CP2021-59.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2020-29309 Filed 1-6-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
#### Evelyn O’Leary et al., Respondents, v. Braile, Inc., et al., Appellants.

Motion by respondents to dismiss appeal denied. Beldock, Acting P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Pette, JJ., concur.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.B CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending
March 31, 2005, of El Paso Natural Gas Company (the Company) as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Greg G. Gruber, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and
Treasurer,
certify (i) that the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (ii) that
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ Greg G. GruberGreg G. GruberSenior Vice President, Chief Financial
Officer and Treasurer
(Principal Financial Officer)
May 11, 2005 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to El Paso Natural Gas Company and will be retained by El Paso Natural
Gas Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
###### Editorial Note on Subpart 1052.2 of Part 1052

#### Editorial Note:

At 79 FR 15554, Mar. 20, 2014, subpart 1052.2 was added, however, the amendment could not be incorporated due to inaccurate amendatory instruction.

#### 1052.219-73 Department of the Treasury Mentor-Protégé Program.

As prescribed in 1019.202-70.(p), insert the following clause:

# Department of the Treasury Mentor-Protégé Program (JUN 2003)

(a) Large and small businesses are encouraged to participate in the Department of the Treasury Mentor-Protégé Program. Mentor firms provide small business protégés with developmental assistance to enhance their capabilities and ability to obtain Federal contracts.

(b) Mentor firms are large prime contractors or eligible small businesses capable of providing developmental assistance. Protégé firms are small businesses as defined in 13 CFR parts 121, 124, and 126.

Developmental assistance includes technical, managerial, financial, and other mutually beneficial assistance to aid protégé. Contractors interested in participating in the Program are encouraged to contact the Department of the Treasury Office of Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization for further information.

(End of provision)
### **CHAPTER 99—DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE PERSONNEL AUTHORITIES**

Sec.
9901.
Definitions.
9902.
Department of Defense personnel authorities.
9903.
Attracting highly qualified experts.
9904.
Special pay and benefits for certain employees outside the United States.
9905.
Direct hire authority for certain personnel of the Department of Defense.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2018**—Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title XI, §1101(b), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 2000, added item 9905.

**2011**—Pub. L. 112–81, div. A, title XI, §1101(d)(1), Dec. 31, 2011, 125 Stat. 1610, amended chapter heading generally, substituting "DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE PERSONNEL AUTHORITIES" for "DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE NATIONAL SECURITY PERSONNEL SYSTEM".

**2009**—Pub. L. 111–84, div. A, title XI, §1113(f)(2), Oct. 28, 2009, 123 Stat. 2502, added item 9902 and struck out former item 9902 "Establishment of human resources management system".
#### § 865.123 Approval of exceptions to directive.

Only the Secretary of the Air Force may authorize or approve a waiver of, or exception to, any part of this subpart.
-       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2023-08-30T17:44:01-0400
      - Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401
      - Government Publishing Office
      - Government Publishing Office attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by Government Publishing Office
MEMORANDUM

TO: The Under Secretary

FROM: The Secretary

SUBJECT: Delegation of Authority

I. DELEGATION

By the authority vested in me by section 412 of the Department of Education 

Organization Act, Public Law 96-88, 20 U.S.C. §3472, I hereby delegate to you, and 

to anyone serving for you in an acting capacity, the authority under 5 U.S.C. §2903 to 

administer oaths of office, on special occasions and upon request, to new employees 

of the Department of Education. This delegation does not alter the authority for 

human resources management conveyed through delegation EA/EM/270, certified on 

June 6, 2002, to the Assistant Secretary for Management.

Unless otherwise noted in future delegations of authority, amendments to the 

authority delegated herein are included within the scope of this delegation.

II. RESERVATIONS: None.

III. REDELEGATION

Subject to applicable provisions of law, this authority may be redelegated in 

accordance with the Administrative Communications System directive, OM:1-102, 

Delegations of Authority, dated November 7, 1997.

IV. CERTIFICATION AND EFFECTIVE DATE

This delegation is effective upon certification by the Department's Principal 

Delegations Control Officer and supersedes all previous delegations of this authority.

__________/s/

Rod Paige

OGC Clearance and Date: /s/ David Berthiaume, 7/14/2004
Certified Date: 8/11/2004

Departmental Delegations Control Officer: /s/ Naty G. Beetle

Control Number: EA/EE/34
### NUMBER 13

- 22

- 00 282

- C V

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

– EDINBURG

SALINAS FUNERAL HOME, INC.

AND ORLANDO ESTRADA OCHOA D/B/A

“IMMACULATE TRANSPORT SERVICES”

, Appellant s

,

v.

MARIBEL SALINAS AND

EDITH SALINAS

, Appellee s

.

On appeal from the 206th District Court

of Hidalgo C ounty, Texas.



### MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Long oria , Hinojosa, and Silva

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Longoria

Appellant s Salinas Funeral Home, Inc. and Orlando Estrada Ochoa d/b/a

“ Immaculate Transport Services ” perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the

206th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas, in cause number C

- 3701

- 20

- D. This appeal2 was abated by the Court o n July 25, 2022. This cause is now before the Court on the

parties’ joint motion to dismiss the appeal filed pursuant to a settlement agreement.

Accordingly, this case is hereby reinstated.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and the part ies ’ joint motion

to dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See T EX

. R.

A PP

. P . 42.1(a). The partie s ’ joint motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby

dismissed. Costs are taxed against the party incurring same. Having dismissed the

appeal at the parties’ request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our

mandate will issue forthwith

. Any pending motions are dismissed as moot.

NORA L. LONGORIA

Justice

Delivered and filed on the

22n d day of Septe m ber, 2022.
P.1 

OAR Box 1837 

Prepped by Keeia Richards 

Document Number: 

182) IV-E-16 

Docket Number: 

A-84-33 

Printed 11/14/2008 3:48:12 PM Sheet 182 of 238 
P.2 

-JA. A-!N-33 

IV-E-lfc jf****-

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

XPRO ^ WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 

January 13, 1989 

MEMORANDUM 

OFFICE OF 

GENERAL COUNSEL 

SUBJECT: Meeting with Department of Interior 

FROM: Gregory B. Foote*" 

Attorney, Air and R"a"<iiation Division 

TO: Central Docket Section (LE-131) 

Docket No. A-84-33 

In reviewing the docket entries for this rulemaking, I 

realized that I inadvertently neglected to submit to you a 

memorialization of a meeting between EPA and the Department of 

Interior (DOI) regarding EPA's proposed surface coal mines (SCM) 

rule. The purpose of this memorandum is to correct that 

oversight. 

The meeting was held on September 24, 1987. A list of the 

participants is attached. At the meeting, DOI and EPA 

representatives discussed technical and policy issues regarding 

the likely impact of an EPA decision to adopt Alternative IV or 

some variation of it (including visibility impacts from SCMs), 

and regarding the extent of DOI's regulation of SCMs. No new 

factual information was submitted. 

Attachment 
P.3 

Sltr&ce- (2>a{ M«Z? Afafa** 

ftkh G^kerir- BM-osc ?ez-76a6 

(UlCfirr^A. Pou^O" IX*!/ ASLHttf 343 - J,-73</ 

(UHOL. C.L.*tfcy £>oz/soLj&>M z<f3-YC,7/, 

Jo_l Yudjos tio//sol/[)Sn 3/3-<T3V 7 

CU* 'JtytLtrtrzu OOL/SOL/OCI^ 3 73 ~Y9 0<$ 

f^dvuy &iykX^J Pot / FTA- 3v*>-<?l/S'l 

SX^^^Ta^r ^o-xy&u 3WW3
#### In the Matter of Keese Milford, Respondent, v. New York State Department of Correction et al., Appellants.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court at Special Term which directed respondents to recompute the remaining time owed on petitioner’s sentence so as to credit against his maximum sentence all “good time” earned from the beginning of his minimum sentence. Special Term considered that this result was mandated by subdivision 4 of section 230 of the Correction Law, added by chapter 826 of the Laws of 1962, and seems to have found invalid, as in conflict therewith, the rule of the Commissioner of Correction providing: “Prisoners who have been paroled, declared delinquent and returned to prison, may receive the benefits of the maximum reduction credit computed on the delinquent time only.” (7 NYCRR 60.3 [h].) The determination at Special Term seems clearly erroneous and we approve the rationale of the decision in *People ex rel. Bell*v. *Murphy*(18 A D 2d 17) which overruled the same contentions as were here advanced by petitioner and adopted by Special Term. Further, and in any event, the question was rendered academic by the amendment of subdivision 4 accomplished by section 3 of chapter 731 of the laws of 1963, effective April 23, 1963, providing in pertinent part as follows: “But all reduction of sentence provided for in this subdivision which is received by a prisoner prior to any release on parole, including release pursuant to this subdivision, shall be forfeited and shall not be restored if the paroled prisoner is returned to an institution under the jurisdiction of the department either for violation of parole or by reason of a conviction for a crime committed while on parole.” Order reversed, on the law and the facts, and petition dismissed, without costs. Bergan, P. J., Gibson, Herlihy, Reynolds and Taylor, JJ., concur. [38 Misc 2d 563.]
FI L ED U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S EL EVENTHCI RCUI T J AN 13, 2011 J OHN L EY CL ERK [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE U

NITED STATE S COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELE VENTH CIRCUIT

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ No. 1 0- 12 67 7 Non -Arg um en t Ca le nd ar

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ D.C. Dock etNo. 1 :0 9- cv -0 26 18 -RBP -HGD RUSSELL FORD, ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll Peti ti on er-Ap pe ll an t,

ve rs us W ILLIE THOMAS, ATTORNEY G ENERAL OF TH E STATE OF ALABAMA, ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll Res po nd en ts -Ap pe ll ees .

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

th e Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co urt forth e North ern Dis tri ctof Al ab am a

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ (J an ua ry 13 , 20 11 ) Befo re TJ OFLAT, BLACK andCARNES, Ci rcu itJu dg es . PER CURI AM:Ru ss el l Fo rd , a Flo rid a st at e p ris on er p ro ceed in g t hr ou gh co un se l, ap pe al s

th e d is tri ctco urt’s d is m is sa l o f hi s 2 8 U.S.C. § 22 54 habe as co rp us pe ti ti on as ti m e-b arre d. Fo rdfil eda no ti ce o f ap pe al , andth e d is tri ctco urt g ran te d h im a cert ifi cat e o f ap pe al ab il it y (COA) as to whet he r he ha d “ m ad e a s ub st an ti al sh owi ng of t he de ni al of aco ns ti tu ti on al rig htwit h re sp ectto hi s cl ai m s re la te d t o ne wly di sc ov eredev id en ce an d a ll eg edde stru ct io n o f ev id en ce.” Fo rdco nt en ds Alab am a’s po st -co nv ic ti on rel ie f pr oc edur es are “ fund am en ta ll y in ad equa te to vi nd ic at e [h is ] subs tant iv e ri gh ts ” b ecau se th e d is tri ctatt orne y de st ro y edev id en ce, in ba d fa it h a ndin vi ol at io n o f th e Due Pro ces s C laus e, whi ch co ul d h av e subs ta nt ia te d h is cla im

of a ctua l i nn oc en ce. A fed eral habe as pe ti ti on er m us t o bt ai n aCOA fro m

th e d is tri ctco urt t o ap pe al th e d en ia l o f hi s § 22 54 habe as pe ti ti on . 28 U.S.C. § 2 25 3( c)(1 )(A). Howev er, “ [w]hena di st ric t co urt d is m is se s a p et it io n a s t im e-b arre d, i t i s in ap pr op ria te to gra nta COA on th e [u nd erl y in g] co ns ti tu ti on al cla im . . . .” Ros s v. Moo re , 24 6 F .3d12 99 , 13 00 (11 th Cir . 20 01 ). 1

In Ross we va cate d the orde r grantinga COA a nd rema nded to the district cour

t “for the 1 limit ed purpose of considering whether a COA should be grante d on the question of whe ther appellant’ s habea s petition is t ime-bar red.” Id. 2Inli gh t o f th e d is tri ctco urt’s u nt im el in es s ru li ng , itwas i napp ro pr ia te to

gr an t a C OA on th e is su e o f whe th er Fo rdha d “ m ad e a s ub st an ti al sh owi ng of t he de ni al of aco ns ti tu ti on al rig htwit h re sp ectto hi s cl ai m s re la te d t o n ewly di sc ov eredev id en ce an d a ll eg edde st ru ct io n o f ev id en ce.” Acc or di ng ly, we va cat e th e o rd er g ran ti ng a COA an d re m an d t o the di st ric t co urt fo r th e li m it edpu rp os e of co ns id eri ng whet he r a COA s ho ul d b e g ran te d o n t he qu es ti on of wh ethe r Fo rd ’s § 2 25 4 p et it io n i s t im e-b arre d. VACATED AND REMANDED.

3
Order entered October 14, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-00454-CR

WILLIAM THOMAS NICHOLAS JR, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Criminal Court No. 10

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. MC15-A0588-L

ORDER

The Court GRANTS the State’s second motion for extension of time to file the State’s 

brief.

We ORDER the Clerk of the Court to file the State’s brief tendered as of the date of this 

order.

/s/ DAVID L. BRIDGES 

PRESIDING JUSTICE
Editorial Note on Part 842
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 842 appear at 81 FR 83688, Nov. 22, 2016.

§ 842.19 Partial payments. Upon request of a claimant, a settlement authority may make a partial payment in advance of final settlement when a claimant experiences personal hardship due to extensive property damage or loss. Partial payments are made if a claim for only part of the loss is submitted and is readily provable, up to the amount of the settlement authority. (The claimant may later amend the claim for the remainder of the loss.) If the total payable amount of the claim exceeds the payment limits of the settlement authority, send it with recommendations to the proper settlement authority. ( a ) If a claim for only part of the loss is submitted and is readily provable, pay it up to the amount of the settlement authority. (The claimant may later amend the claim for the remainder of the loss.) If the total payable amount of the claim exceeds the payment limits of the settlement authority, send it with recommendations through claims channels to the proper settlement authority.
( b ) When the total claim is submitted and the amount payable exceeds the settlement authority, pay a partial payment within the limits of settlement authority and send the claim, with recommendations, through claims channels to the proper settlement authority.
[55 FR 2809, Jan. 29, 1990. Redesignated and amended at 81 FR 83688, 83689, Nov. 22, 2016]
#### 1252.217-77 Title.

As prescribed at 1217.7001(b), insert the following clause:

# Title (NOV 2022)

(a) Unless otherwise provided, title to all materials and equipment to be incorporated in a vessel in the performance of this contract shall vest in the Government upon delivery at the location specified for the performance of the work.

(b) Upon completion of the contract, or with the approval of the Contracting Officer during performance of the contract, all Contractor-furnished materials and equipment not incorporated in, or placed on, any vessel, shall become the property of the Contractor, unless the Government has reimbursed the Contractor for the cost of the materials and equipment.

(c) The vessel, its equipment, movable stores, cargo, or other ship's materials shall not be considered Government-furnished property.

(End of clause)
March 31, 1975.

M. P. No. 74-53.

#### Henry LaPlume *v.*James W. Mullen, *Warden.*

*John D. Lynch,*for petitioner. *Julius C. Michaelson,*Attorney General, for respondent.

Upon motion of the petitioner, this matter having been assigned for oral argument on April 8, 1975, it is reassigned to the May Continuous Argument Calendar.
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 23

- 00113

- CV

I N THE I NTEREST OF E.J., B.J., K.C.

AND K.C., C HILDREN §

§

§

§ On Appeal from the 360th District

Court

of Tarrant Co unty ( 360

- 714221

- 22 )

October 5, 2023

Memorandum Opinion by Justice

Walker

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the tri al

court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ B rian Walker

Justice Brian Walker
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL

THE INSPECTOR GENERAL

MEMORANDUM

TO: Special Agent in Charge/Investigation, Boston/New York OIG Region ◄▬▬

Special Agent in Charge/Investigation, Washington/Philadelphia OIG Region 

Special Agent in Charge/Investigation, Atlanta OIG Region 

Special Agent in Charge/Investigation, Chicago OIG Region 

Special Agent in Charge/Investigation, Long Beach OIG Office

FROM: Assistant Inspector General for Investigation 

SUBJECT: Redelegation of Authority to Sign and Issue Inspector General's Subpoenas

I. DELEGATION

Under the authority vested in me by a delegation from the Inspector General, 

Delegation Control Number EF/EFI/148, certified July 23, 2004, I hereby delegate to 

you and to anyone serving for you in an acting capacity, the authority under Section 6 

(a) (4) of the Inspector General Act of 1978, as amended, to issue Inspector General's 

subpoenas in furtherance of the duties and functions of the Office of Inspector General.

Unless otherwise noted in future delegations of authority, amendments to the 

authorities delegated herein are included within the scope of this delegation.

II. RESERVATIONS

None.

III. REDELEGATION

This authority may not be redelegated.
Page 2 - Redelegation of Authority to Sign and Issue IG's Administrative Subpoenas 

IV. CERTIFICATION AND EFFECTIVE DATE

This delegation is effective upon certification by the Department's Delegation Control 

Officer and supersedes all previous delegations of this authority. I hereby ratify actions 

within the scope of this delegation taken by the addressees prior to certification of this 

delegation.

 ____________/s/__________

 William D. Hamel

OGC Clearance and Date: /s/ David Berthiaume, 12/22/08

Certified Date: 12/31/2008

Departmental Delegations Control Officer: /s/ Naty G. Beetle

Control Number: EFI/EFD1I/177
June 12, 2012 

Meredith E. Walker 

Airworthiness & Certification 

Gulfstream Aerospace Corporation 

P.O. Box 2206 

Savannah, GA 31402-2206 

Dear Mr. Walker: 

This is in response to your February 14, 2012, letter sent to the public docket 

(No. FAA-2012-0175) petitioning the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on behalf 

of Gulfstream Aerospace Corporation (Gulfstream) for an exemption from 

§§ 25.1457(a)(6) and 91.609(j) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). That 

exemption, if granted, would allow Gulfstream to perform certain U.S. domestic 

modification and operational functions that are vital to the finished product 

commensurate with final delivery and export of large cabin jet transport airplanes. 

On May 9, 2012 you emailed the FAA withdrawing your petition for exemption. The 

FAA will consider your petition closed and take no further action on your petition. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Brenda D. Courtney 

Manager, Aircraft and 

 Airport Rules Division