alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 626 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 626

 To require Senate confirmation of the Inspector General of the Bureau 
       of Consumer Financial Protection, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 14, 2017

   Mr. Portman (for himself, Mr. Enzi, Mr. Heller, Mr. Isakson, Mr. 
  Barrasso, Mr. Hoeven, Ms. Collins, Mr. Blunt, Mr. Boozman, and Mr. 
   Cochran) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
    referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To require Senate confirmation of the Inspector General of the Bureau 
       of Consumer Financial Protection, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Bureau of Consumer Financial 
Protection-Inspector General Reform Act of 2017'' or the ``CFPB-IG Act 
of 2017''.

SEC. 2. APPOINTMENT OF INSPECTOR GENERAL.

    The Inspector General Act of 1978 (5 U.S.C. App.) is amended--
            (1) in section 8G--
                    (A) in subsection (a)(2), by striking ``and the 
                Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection'';
                    (B) in subsection (c), by striking ``For the 
                purposes of implementing this section'' and all that 
                follows through the end of the subsection; and
                    (C) in subsection (g)(3), by striking ``and the 
                Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection''; and
            (2) in section 12--
                    (A) in paragraph (1), by inserting ``the Director 
                of the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection;'' after 
                ``the President of the Export-Import Bank;''; and
                    (B) in paragraph (2), by inserting ``the Bureau of 
                Consumer Financial Protection,'' after ``the Export-
                Import Bank,''.
                                 <all>
```
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. George Dewey, Appellant.

Order unanimously affirmed. No opinion. Present— Bergan, P. J., Coon, Gibson, Herlihy and Reynolds, JJ.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Election Commission

# TIME AND DATE:

Thursday, January 14, 2021 at 10:00 a.m.

# PLACE:

Virtual meeting. Note: Because of the covid-19 pandemic, we will conduct the open meeting virtually. If you would like to access the meeting, see the instructions below.

# STATUS:

                        This meeting will be open to the public. To access the virtual meeting, go to the commission's website                               ( print page 1971)    *www.fec.gov*                         and click on the banner to be taken to the meeting page.                    

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

 

Welcoming Remarks

Draft Advisory Opinion 2020-02: Bertrand

Audit Division Recommendation Memorandum on the Mississippi Republican Party (A17-05)

Audit Division Recommendation Memorandum on Van Drew for Congress (A19-04)

Audit Division Recommendation Memorandum on the National Tooling & Machining Association (NTMA) Committee for a Strong Economy

(A19-10)

Proposed Final Audit Report on the Democratic Foundation of Orange County (A19-23)

Management and Administrative Matters

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Judith Ingram, Press Officer, Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

Authority:Government in the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552b

Laura E. Sinram,

Acting Secretary and Clerk of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 2021-00463 Filed 1-7-21; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6715-01-P
#### Roundhouse Construction Corporation *v.*Richard P. Fischer et al.

*William W. Sprague,*on the motion.

Submitted December 30, 1974

decided January 7, 1975

The motion by William W. Sprague for leave to file a brief and to argue before this court as amicus curiae in the appeal from the Superior Court in Fairfield County is granted to the extent that permission to file a brief is granted.
Hogan Lovells US LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in the District of Columbia. Hogan Lovells refers to the international legal practice comprising Hogan Lovells

US LLP, Hogan Lovells International LLP, Hogan Lovells Worldwide Group (a Swiss Verein), and their affiliated businesses with offices in: Abu Dhabi Alicante Amsterdam

Baltimore Beijing Berlin Boulder Brussels Caracas Chicago Colorado Springs Denver Dubai Dusseldorf Frankfurt Hamburg Hanoi Ho Chi Minh City Hong

Kong Houston London Los Angeles Madrid Miami Milan Moscow Munich New York Northern Virginia Paris Philadelphia Prague Rome San Francisco

Shanghai Silicon Valley Singapore Tokyo Warsaw Washington DC Associated offices: Budapest Jeddah Riyadh Zagreb

\\DC - 004721/000002 - 3472739 v1

Hogan Lovells US LLP

Columbia Square

555 Thirteenth Street, NW

Washington, DC 20004

T +1 202 637 5600

F +1 202 637 5910

www.hoganlovells.com

Patrick R. Rizzi, Counsel

+1 202 637 5659 (direct phone)

patrick.rizzi@hoganlovells.com

August 9, 2012

VIA EMAIL and REGULATIONS.GOV

Dennis J. DeVany, Chief

Kevin Adams

EAS and Domestic Analysis

U.S. Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E.

Washington, D.C. 20591

Re: EAS at Akutan, Alaska (Docket DOT-OST-2000-7068)

Dear Messrs. DeVany and Adams:

Peninsula Airways, Inc. (“PenAir”), the current provider of essential air service at Akutan,

Alaska, requests that the designated airport for this service be changed from Akutan Seaplane

Base (KQA) to the new airport for Akutan on Akun Island (ICAO: PAUT; FAA: 7AK). Such a

change will facilitate this service and make use of these new facilities for the benefit of

passengers. The State of Alaska has made the same request to change the designated Akutan

airport. See Letter of S. Hatter, State of Alaska DOT, to D. DeVany, U.S. DOT, dated August 6,

2012.

Respectfully submitted,

Patrick R. Rizzi

Counsel for PenAir

cc: rich.sewell@alaska.gov

rebecca.cronkhite@alaska.gov

Linda.bustamante@alaska.gov

Joy.C.Doby@usps.gov

akutanadmin@gci.net

jbereskin@gci.net
Exhibit 10.74



 







Exhibit 10.74




Retail Ventures, Inc. Summary of Director Compensation





	1.	 	Each of Messrs. Aaron, Ring, Sonnenberg and Weisman and Ms. Eveillard is paid an annual
retainer of $30,000 for service on the Company’s Board of Directors (the “Board”);
	 
	2.	 	Each of Messrs. Aaron, Ring, Sonnenberg and Weisman and Ms. Eveillard receive an additional
$20,000 annual fee for service on each of the following committees of the Board on which he or
she serves: (i) Audit Committee; (ii) Compensation Committee; (iii) Nominating and Corporate
Governance Committee; and (iv) Community Affairs Committee (Mr. Weisman does not
receive any compensation for serving on the Community Affairs Committee);
	 
	3.	 	Each of Messrs. Aaron, Deshe, Diamond, Sonnenberg, Ring and Weisman and Ms. Eveillard
receive a quarterly Board meeting fee of $5,000 so long as he or she attends at least one
Board meeting during that quarter; and
	 
	4.	 	Pursuant to the terms of the Company’s Amended and Restated 2000 Stock Incentive Plan, each
of Messrs. Aaron, Ring, Sonnenberg and Weisman and Ms. Eveillard automatically receives, on
the first trading day in each fiscal quarter, non-statutory options to purchase 2,500 of the
Company’s common shares having: (i) an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the
common shares on the grant date; (ii) a vesting period of one year from the grant date, if the
recipient serves continuously as a non-employee director during that time; and (iii) an
expiration period of ten years from the grant date, subject to earlier expiration if the
recipient terminates service with the Company before the end of the ten year period.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                           UT
<LEGEND>
All amounts in thousands of dollars except per share amounts.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000764403
<NAME>                        E'town Corporation & Subsidiaries

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-Mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-2000
<BOOK-VALUE>                                   PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      660,896
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                    84,898
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         73,524
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                       36,194
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                      0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 855,512
<COMMON>                                       182,514
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                       (3,945)
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                             51,710
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 230,279
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           12,000
<PREFERRED>                                        227
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           282,254
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                              64,000
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                       13,246
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                      589
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 252,972
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  855,512
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                       38,163
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                             1,161
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      29,131
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      30,292
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                          7,871
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                 290
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                   8,161
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         5,697
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,464
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        203
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                    2,261
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                         4,473
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                        4,438
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                           6,663
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.26
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.26



</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

CASE NO. 1:12-cv-00261

WAYNE and CARRIE HERR,

Plaintiff,

v.

STELLAR RECOVERY, INC.,

Defendant.

_____________________________________/

JOINT STIPULATION FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

COMES now all parties in the above titled action and represents to the Court that this 

matter, regarding Plaintiffs’ claims against Defendant, has been settled amicably, and would 

request an entry of Final Order of Dismissal with Prejudice in this matter, with each party to bear 

its own costs and attorneys’ fees.

Dated this 8th day of May, 2012.

/s/ Alex D. Weisberg

Alex Weisberg, Esq.

IBN: 6271510

Weisberg & Meyers, LLC

5722 S. Flamingo Road, Ste. 656

Cooper City, FL 33330

Attorney for Plaintiffs

/s/ Nicholas D. O’Conner & /s/David Schultz-(with consent)

Nicholas D. O’Conner David Schultz 

HINSHAW & CULBERTSON LLP

222 North LaSalle Street, Suite 300

Chicago IL 60601

Attorneys for Defendant

Case: 1:12-cv-00261 Document #: 10 Filed: 05/08/12 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:21
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL

I, Alex D. Weisberg, certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing Joint Stipulation 

for Voluntary Dismissal was served via electronic mail on the following: Nicholas D. O’Conner, 

at noconner@hinshawlaw.com and David Schultz, at dschultz@hinshawlaw.com, on May 8, 

2012.

By: s/ Alex Weisberg______ 

 

ALEX D. WEISBERG

IBN: 6271510

WEISBERG & MEYERS, LLC

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFFS

5722 S. Flamingo Road, Ste. 656

Cooper City, FL 33330

(954) 212-2184

(866) 577-0963 fax

aweisberg@attorneysforconsumers.com

Case: 1:12-cv-00261 Document #: 10 Filed: 05/08/12 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:22
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Charles Everett, Appellant.

Motion to dispense with printing granted. The appeal will be heard on the original papers (including the typed minutes) and on a typewritten brief. The appellant is directed to file five typewritten copies of his brief and to serve one copy on the District Attorney. The appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged to the February 1961 Term. The appeal is ordered placed on the calendar for said term. Motion for assignment of counsel granted. George C. Wildermuth, Esq., 188 Montague Street, Brooklyn 1, N. Y., is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal. Nolan, P. J., Beldoek, Ughetta, Kleinfeld and Christ, JJ., concur.
#### In the Matter of the Probate of the Will of Margaret Felli, Deceased. Charles Swain, Appellant; Florence H. Schwartz et al., Respondents.

*Per Curiam.*

The findings of the jury upon which the will was denied probate are supported by no direct evidence whatsoever and .by no inferences of even slight substantiality. Decree reversed on the law and the facts, with costs to *739appellant payable out of the estate; verdict set aside and petition for probate granted; and proceeding remitted to the Surrogate’s Court, Greene County, for the entry of a decree accordingly. Settle order on notice. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds, Aulisi and Hamm, JJ., concur.
Page 1 of 3

Disposition Comments

Docket No: FAA-2013-1072 These comments are in

Directorate ID: 2012-NM-164-AD response to an SNPRM

Originating Office Tracking No.: 2012-0188

Next Step: FRAN SNPRM

 No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received – If this box is checked, no signatures are 

required.

No Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? If yes,

list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously 

published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1C Chapter 9.

ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD: 

If NO, we don’t agree because 

ISSUE 2: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD:
Page 2 of 3

If NO, we don’t agree because 

For additional issues, double-click here
Page 3 of 3

Signature Section

Signature indicates concurrence with this action.

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

ASE Printed Name: Date

Branch Manager Date
Fiscal Year 2019 Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies - PUERTO RICO

No data No data No data

LEA ID District FY 2019 Title I Allocation

4300030 Puerto Rico 405,828,284

4399999 PART D SUBPART 2 0

No data No data No data

* Actual amounts received by LEAs will be smaller than shown here due to State-level adjustments to Federal Title I allocations. States adjust

 allocations, for example, to reflect LEA boundary changes or the creation of new LEAs, including charter school LEAs, that are not accounted

 for in the statutory calculations. States also are permitted to reserve, for administration, up to 1 percent of the allocations they would receive

 if $14 billion were appropriated and generally must reserve 7 percent of their allocations for school improvement. These 

 adjustments will reduce the actual amounts available.

X0AT
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Irene E. Adamski, Respondent, v. New York State Workmen’s Compensation Board et al., Appellants, and Special Disability Fund, Respondent. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.

Appeal by an employer and carrier from decisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Board dated respectively October 24, 1962 and June 20, 1963 awarding death benefits to a widow and minor child of the decedent. On July 21, 1960 the lifeless body of deceased, a member of the Workmen’s Compensation Board for the preceding 15 years, was found in a room in a hotel in New York City which he- occupied while in attendance at its hearings. No autopsy was performed. The public medical examiner assigned occlusive coronary artery disease as the cause of death. Deceased suffered a myocardial infarction in 1954. On January 4, 1957 he sustained traumatic myocardial damage resulting from an industrial accident for which the board made an award of disability compensation which appellants accepted and; paid. The sole issue presented on appeal is whether there is substantial evidence to support the board’s present finding that deceased’s death was causally related to the accident of January 4, 1957. Doctor Rutecki, who had attended deceased following the occurrence of the heart attack in 1954, on the occasion of his accidental injury in 1957 and thereafter until his death testified that the injury to the heart muscle incurred by the jolt of a railroad car had produced a coronary insufficiency leading to necrosis which in turn reduced the pumping force of the heart to a point where it could no longer meet its demands. He attributed his death to this chain of events. Doctor Chappie, a heart specialist, testified that the traumatic myocardial damage was a factor contributing to the death. The carrier’s medical consultant, Doctor Clark, also a specialist in cardiology, denied causal relationship attributing the death to the coronary arteriosclerotic condition to which the accidental injury made no significant contribution. There were thus conflicting expert opinions which were based upon the same facts. The selection of either was within the fact-finding power of the board. Its choice on this record is beyond our power to disturb. *(Matter of Palermo*v. *Gallucci & Sons,*5 N Y 2d 529.) Decisions affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Gibson, P. J., Reynolds, Taylor, Aulisi and Hamm, JJ., concur.
# A

Adult_Education_State_Grants

Byrd_Honors_Scholarships

Class_Size_Reduction

Client_Assistance_State_Grants

Education_for_Homeless_Children_and_Youth

Eisenhower_Professional_Development_State_Grants

ESEA_Title_I__Capital_Expenses_for_Private_School_Children

ESEA_Title_I__Demonstrations_of_Comprehensive_School_Reform

ESEA_Title_I__Even_Start

ESEA_Title_I__Grants_to_Local_Educational_Agencies

ESEA_Title_I__Migrant

ESEA_Title_I__Neglected_and_Delinquent

Federal_Pell_Grants

Federal_Perkins_Loans__Capital_Contributions

Federal_Supplemental_Educational_Opportunity_Grants

Federal_Work_Study

Fund_for_the_Improvement_of_Education

Goals_2000__State_and_Local_Education_Systemic_Improvement

Grand_Total

Immigrant_Education

Impact_Aid__Basic_Support_Payments

Impact_Aid__Payments_for_Children_with_Disabilities

Independent_Living_State_Grants

Indian_Education__Grants_to_Local_Educational_Agencies

Innovative_Education_Program_Strategies_State_Grants

Leveraging_Educational_Assistance_Partnership

Protection_and_Advocacy_for_Assistive_Technology

Protection_and_Advocacy_of_Individual_Rights

Safe_and_Drug_Free_Schools_State_Grants

Special_Education__Grants_for_Infants_and_Families

Special_Education__Grants_to_States

Special_Education__Preschool_Grants

State_Grants_for_Incarcerated_Youth_Offenders

Supported_Employment_State_Grants

Technology_Literacy_Challenge_Fund

Vocational_Education__Tech_Prep_Education

Vocational_Education_State_Grants

Vocational_Rehabilitation_State_Grants
### §6962. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 103–354, title II, §228, formerly §246, Oct. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 3223; Pub. L. 104–127, title III, §336(a)(2)(D), (b)(2)(B), (c)(3), (d)(2), Apr. 4, 1996, 110 Stat. 1005, 1006; Pub. L. 107–171, title VIII, §8002(c), May 13, 2002, 116 Stat. 473; Pub. L. 115–334, title XII, §§12404(b)(1), 12410(a)(c)(1)(A), Dec. 20, 2018, 132 Stat. 4975, 4977, 4978, was moved so as to appear at the end of subtitle B of title II of Pub. L. 103–354 by Pub. L. 115–334, title XII, §12410(c)(1)(B), Dec. 20, 2018, 132 Stat. 4978, and editorially reclassified as section 6936 of this title.
EXHIBIT 10.29

                                Zone 4 Play, Inc.

                    SUMMARY OF DIRECTORS ONGOING COMPENSATION

The following is a summary of the currently effective ongoing compensation of
the following Non Executive Directors (each, a "Director") of Zone 4 Play, Inc.
(the "Company") for services provided to the Company as Directors, which is
subject to modification at any time by the Board of Directors.

Shlomo Rothman and Oded Zucker Director shall receive each annual cash
compensation of $7,000 payable in quarterly installments and an additional $750
per each board meeting.

Adiv Baruch, Liron Edrey and Ronen Zadok do not receive ongoing compensation
from the Company.