Fiscal Year 2010 Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies - MARYLAND

Maximum Required

Expenditures For 

Choice-Related Maximum Per-Child

Transportation Expenditure For

FY 2010 Title I And Supplemental Supplemental

LEA ID District Allocation* Educational Services** Educational Services***

2400030 ALLEGANY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2,744,973 548,995 1,743.95

2400060 ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 9,727,248 1,945,450 1,884.76

2400090 BALTIMORE CITY PUBLIC SCHOOL SYSTEM 62,185,884 12,437,177 2,578.08

2400120 BALTIMORE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 23,252,572 4,650,514 2,225.13

2400150 CALVERT COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1,284,054 256,811 1,429.90

2400180 CAROLINE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1,048,833 209,767 1,383.68

2400210 CARROLL COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1,265,576 253,115 885.64

2400240 CECIL COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2,466,289 493,258 1,521.46

2400270 CHARLES COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2,857,868 571,574 1,516.92

2400300 DORCHESTER COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1,582,621 316,524 1,641.72

2400330 FREDERICK COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 3,449,209 689,842 1,564.98

2400360 GARRETT COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1,428,118 285,624 1,651.00

2400390 HARFORD COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 4,325,783 865,157 1,650.43

2400420 HOWARD COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1,884,380 376,876 894.34

2400450 KENT COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 513,328 102,666 1,340.28

2400480 MONTGOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 20,927,210 4,185,442 2,122.22

2400510 PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 26,447,043 5,289,409 2,557.99

2400540 QUEEN ANNES COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 686,642 137,328 1,357.00

2400570 SOMERSET COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1,520,954 304,191 1,873.10

2400600 ST. MARYS COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2,364,214 472,843 1,480.41

2400630 TALBOT COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 772,638 154,528 1,374.80

2400660 WASHINGTON COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 4,247,420 849,484 1,643.10

2400690 WICOMICO COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 4,282,770 856,554 1,765.36

2400720 WORCESTER COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1,777,093 355,419 1,668.63

2499999 PART D SUBPART 2 759,433 151,887 0.00

* Actual amounts received by LEAs will be smaller than shown here due to State-level adjustments to Federal Title I allocations. States adjust

 allocations, for example, to reflect LEA boundary changes or the creation of new LEAs, including charter school LEAs, that are not accounted

 for in the statutory calculations. States also are permitted to reserve, for administration, up to 1 percent of the allocations they would receive

 if $14 billion were appropriated and generally must reserve 4 percent in fiscal year 2010 for school improvement activities. These 

 adjustments will reduce the actual amounts available under all three columns of the table.

** An LEA must use up to an amount equal to 20 percent of its Title I, Part A allocation (the “20-percent reservation”) received from the State 

 to cover choice-related transportation costs for students who exercise a choice option and to pay for supplemental educational services for

 students whose parents request such services. The 20-percent reservation may include Title I, Part A funds or funding from other Federal,

 State, local, and private sources. The amount shown in this column is the Department’s estimate of the amount that affected LEAs - those

 with schools identified for improvement, corrective action, or restructuring - may have to spend to meet this requirement. Actual 

 expenditures will depend on such factors as the number of students exercising a choice option or receiving supplemental educational services and

 the costs of satisfying these requests. An LEA has discretion to determine the allocation of these funds between choice-related transportation

 and supplemental educational services, except that it must spend at least one-quarter of the 20-percent reservation - or an amount equal to

 5 percent of its Title I, Part A allocation - on each activity if there is demand for both from students and their parents.

*** An LEA that must arrange for supplemental educational services is required to pay, for each child receiving services, the lesser of the actual cost

 of the services or an amount equal to the LEA’s Title I, Part A allocation received from the State divided by the number of poor students in the

 LEA, as determined by estimates produced by the US Bureau of the Census. Thus the amount shown in this column reflects the statutory “cap”

 on per-child expenditures for supplemental educational services.