alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §6409. Assessments

#### (a) In general

The order shall provide that each fluid milk processor shall pay an assessment on each unit of fluid milk product that such person processes and markets commercially in consumer-type packages in the United States.

#### (b) No effect on producer prices

Such assessments shall not—

(1) reduce the prices paid under the Federal milk marketing orders issued under section 608c of this title;

(2) otherwise be deducted from the amounts that handlers must pay to producers for fluid milk products sold to a processor; or

(3) otherwise be deducted from the price of milk paid to a producer by a handler, as determined by the Secretary.

#### (c) Remitting assessments

#### (1) In general

Assessments required under subsection (a) shall be remitted by the fluid milk processor directly to the Board in accordance with the order and regulations issued by the Secretary.

#### (2) Time to remit assessment

Each processor who is responsible for the remittance of an assessment under paragraph (1) shall remit the assessment to the Board not later than the last day of the month following the month that the milk being assessed was marketed.

#### (3) Verification

Remittances shall be verified by market administrators and State regulatory officials, and local and State Agricultural Stabilization and Conservation Service offices, as provided by the Secretary.

#### (d) Limitation on assessments

Not more than one assessment may be assessed under this section for the purposes of this chapter on a processor for any unit of fluid milk product.

#### (e) Producer-handlers

Producer-handlers that are required to pay the assessment imposed under section 4504(g) of this title, and that are fluid milk processors, shall also be responsible for the additional assessment imposed by this section.

#### (f) Processor assessment rate

Except as provided in section 6415(b) of this title, the rate of assessment prescribed by the order shall be 20 cents per hundredweight of fluid milk products marketed.

(Pub. L. 101–624, title XIX, §1999J, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 3921; Pub. L. 103–72, §2(b), Aug. 11, 1993, 107 Stat. 717.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1993—Subsec. (e). Pub. L. 103–72 inserted ", and that are fluid milk processors," after "section 4504(g) of this title".
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                          0000032284
<NAME>                                         Orion Diversified Technologies

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              APR-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 MAY-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   OCT-31-1997
<CASH>                                              0
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    0
<PP&E>                                              0
<DEPRECIATION>                                      0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         129,212
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                       18,469
<OTHER-SE>                                   (147,681)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        0
<SALES>                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    0
<CGS>                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              104,481
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                32,984
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 0
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                   32,984
<EPS-BASIC>                                       .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .02



</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 2.2

                         UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT
                          EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
                              CHATTANOOGA DIVISION


In re:

NOXSO CORPORATION                                  Chapter 11 - Judge Stinnett

                  Debtor                           No. 97-10709


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                  FINAL DECREE
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

         It appearing to the Court that Debtor's confirmed plan has been
substantially consummated as defined by 11 U.S.C. ss. 1101, all sums owing the
United States Trustee have been paid or reserved, and that the estate of the
above named Debtor has been fully administered, it is, accordingly,

         ORDERED that this Chapter 11 case shall be and hereby is closed.

         ENTER.

                                                   /s/ R. Thomas Stinnett
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                  R. Thomas Stinnett
                                                  United States Bankruptcy Judge
1222.101-70 Admittance of union representatives to DOT installations. ( a ) It is DOT policy to admit labor union representatives of contractor employees to DOT installations to visit work sites and transact labor union business with contractors, their employees, or union stewards pursuant to existing union collective bargaining agreements. Their presence shall not interfere with the contractor's work progress under a DOT contract, nor violate the safety or security regulations that may be applicable to persons visiting the installation. The union representatives will not be permitted to conduct meetings, collect union dues, or make speeches concerning union matters while visiting a work site.
( b ) Whenever a union representative is denied entry to a work site, the person denying entry shall make a written report to the labor advisor for the applicable Operating Administration or to the DOT labor coordinator, the Office of the General Counsel, Office of General Law, within the Office of the Secretary of Transportation, within two working days after the request for entry is denied. The report shall include the reason(s) for the denial, the name of the representative denied entry, the union affiliation and number, and the name and title of the person that denied the entry.
EXHIBIT 23.1

       Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration Statement of
Composite Technology Corporation on Form S-8 (No. 333-121922, 333-112679,
333-83504) of our report dated December 7, 2005 (which includes an emphasis
paragraph relating to an uncertainty as to the Company's ability to continue as
a going concern), relating to our audit of the consolidated financial statements
and internal control over financial reporting, which appear in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K of Composite Technology Corporation for the year ended
September 30, 2005.

Our report dated December 7, 2005, on management's assessment of the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness
of internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2005, expressed
an opinion that Composite Technology Corporation had not maintained effective
internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2005 based on
"criteria established in Internal Control--Integrated Framework issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)."

Singer, Lewak, Greenbaum, and Goldstein, LLP

/s/ Singer Lewak Greenbaum & Goldstein LLP
------------------------------------------
Los Angeles, California
December 13, 2005
### §6962a. Cooperative agreements

Notwithstanding any other provision of law (including provisions of law requiring competition), the Secretary of Agriculture may on and after October 28, 2000, enter into cooperative agreements (which may provide for the acquisition of goods or services, including personal services) with a State, political subdivision, or agency thereof, a public or private agency, organization, or any other person, if the Secretary determines that the objectives of the agreement will: (1) serve a mutual interest of the parties to the agreement in carrying out the programs administered by the Natural Resources Conservation Service; and (2) all parties will contribute resources to the accomplishment of these objectives: Provided, That Commodity Credit Corporation funds obligated for such purposes shall not exceed the level obligated by the Commodity Credit Corporation for such purposes in fiscal year 1998.

(Pub. L. 106–387, §1(a) [title VII, §714], Oct. 28, 2000, 114 Stat. 1549, 1549A–30.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2001, and not as part of the Department of Agriculture Reorganization Act of 1994, which in part comprises this chapter.
#### The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v. Robert Cowan, Respondent.

Appeal by the People from an order of the former County Court, County of Kings, dated August 30, 1962, which granted defendant’s oral motion pursuant to section 668 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to dismiss for lack of prosecution an indictment charging that on August 5, 1961 defendant committed the crimes of attempted rape in the first degree, assault in the second degree (two counts) and abduction. Order reversed on the law and the facts; indictment reinstated; and defendant’s motion to dismiss denied without prejudice to renewal on proper papers, as indicated herein. Having reviewed the record on appeal and the former County Court’s records maintained in connection with this action, we are unable to determine whether the learned Judge correctly decided defendant’s motion. Defendant’s oral motion did not state any facts in its support. The .brief exchange between the court and the prosecutor is equally capable of construction in support of, and against, the court’s decision. In our opinion, an oral motion to dismiss an indictment for lack of prosecution pursuant to the statute (Code Grim. Pro., § 668) should not be entertained unless the People state that they consent to the granting of the motion. We hold that in all other cases, until the adoption of appropriate rules in the counties within the Second Judicial Department, applications to dismiss indictments pursuant to section 668 of the Code of Criminal Procedure shall be made upon prior written notice of motion and shall be supported by affidavits; and that affidavits in opposition shall be submitted by the People. Records proper in form and content will thus be before us; and the rights of both the People and the defendant will tend, on appeal, to be better secured than they are under the present informal practice (cf. *People*v. *Lombardi,*18 A D 2d 177, affd. 13 N Y 2d 1014). Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Brennan and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
1 

### Hutson, Nick

From: Hutson, Nick Sent: Friday, July 31, 2015 4:57 PM To: Frey, Nathan J. Cc: Fruh, Steve; Culligan, Kevin; 'Szabo, Aaron' Subject: 111(b) preamble/rule and RIA Attachments: 111b preamble_FINAL_DRAFT_073115_cleandocx.docx; 11 1b preamble_RLSO_compare_ 073015_to_073115.docx; 111b preamble_RLSO_compare_0 50715_to_073115.docx; EO 12866_111(b) New-Mods 2060-AQ91 RIA Final_07312015. docx

Nathan –

Please find attached 4 files:

1. A clean version of the current 111(b) preamble and rule that we believes is responsive to EO12866 inte ragency review 2. A RLSO version that shows changes compared to the v ersion that I sent you yesterday 3. A RLSO version that shows all change compared to th e original submission on 05/07/15 4. The 111(b) RIA – there are no changes to the most r ecent version that was submitted

Please let me know if there are any additional issu es that we need to resolve.

I am editing the 3 TSDs now and responding to comme nts. I will send you updated versions within the n ext hour.

Regards, Nick



# Nick Hutson, PhD

Energy Strategies Group Office of Air & Radiation U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 tel: +1 919 541 2968 email: hutson.nick@epa.gov
No. 766.

#### V. F. Miller *v.*United States.

March 29, 1920.

Petition for a writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court *585of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

*Mr. A. M. Chambers*for petitioner.

*Mr. Assistant Attorney General Stewart*and *Mr. H. S. Ridgely*for the United States.
### §136r–1. Integrated Pest Management

The Secretary of Agriculture, in cooperation with the Administrator, shall implement research, demonstration, and education programs to support adoption of Integrated Pest Management. Integrated Pest Management is a sustainable approach to managing pests by combining biological, cultural, physical, and chemical tools in a way that minimizes economic, health, and environmental risks. The Secretary of Agriculture and the Administrator shall make information on Integrated Pest Management widely available to pesticide users, including Federal agencies. Federal agencies shall use Integrated Pest Management techniques in carrying out pest management activities and shall promote Integrated Pest Management through procurement and regulatory policies, and other activities.

(Pub. L. 104–170, title III, §303, Aug. 3, 1996, 110 Stat. 1512.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Food Quality Protection Act of 1996, and not as part of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act which comprises this subchapter.
#### Cynthia MacBrien-Collins, Appellant, v Gidron Oldsmobile & Cadillac, L.L.C., Respondents, et al., Defendants.

[831 NYS2d 711]

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Howard R. Silver, J.), entered January 10, 2006, which granted the motion of defendant Gidron Oldsmobile & Cadillac for summary judgment dismissing the complaint against it, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Defendant demonstrated that it is not the alter ego of the corporate entity on whose premises plaintiff was injured, thus shifting the burden to plaintiff, whose submissions were insufficient to raise an issue of fact in that regard *(see Stankowski v Kim,*286 AD2d 282, 283 [2001], *appeal dismissed*97 NY2d 677 [2001]). Concur—Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Sullivan, Nardelli and Buckley, JJ.
§ 94.5 Forms required. The following forms required for naturalization purposes may be obtained from any office of the Immigration and Naturalization Service: ( a ) N-400 Application to File a Petition for Naturalization (Adult) (Submit original form only).
( b ) N-402 Application to File a Petition for Naturalization (Child) (Submit original form only).
( c ) G-325 Biographic Information (Submit original and duplicate of multileaf form).
( d ) G-325B Biographic Information (Submit original form only).
( e ) FD-258 Applicant Fingerprint Card (Submit one completed card).
( f ) N-426 Certificate of Military or Naval Service (Submit in triplicate). (Should be handled on a priority basis so as to avoid prejudicing the early completion of the naturalization process, particularly for an alien who may receive an overseas assignment.)
( g ) “Naturalization Requirements and General Information,” published by the U.S. Department of Justice (Form N-17) describes the naturalization requirements and lists Immigration and Naturalization offices which process applications.
§ 935.134 Arm signals. ( a ) Any person operating a motor vehicle and making a turn or coming to a stop shall signal the turn or stop in accordance with this section.
( b ) A signal for a turn or stop is made by fully extending the left arm as follows: ( 1 ) Left turn—extend left arm horizontally.
( 2 ) Right turn—extend left arm upward.
( 3 ) Stop or decrease speed—extend left arm downward.
( c ) A signal light or other device may be used in place of an arm signal prescribed in paragraph (b) of this section if it is visible and intelligible.
12.212 Computer software. ( a ) Commercial computer software or commercial computer software documentation shall be acquired under licenses customarily provided to the public to the extent such licenses are consistent with Federal law and otherwise satisfy the Government's needs. Generally, offerors and contractors shall not be required to— ( 1 ) Furnish technical information related to commercial computer software or commercial computer software documentation that is not customarily provided to the public; or
( 2 ) Relinquish to, or otherwise provide, the Government rights to use, modify, reproduce, release, perform, display, or disclose commercial computer software or commercial computer software documentation except as mutually agreed to by the parties.
( b ) With regard to commercial computer software and commercial computer software documentation, the Government shall have only those rights specified in the license contained in any addendum to the contract. For additional guidance regarding the use and negotiation of license agreements for commercial computer software, see 27.405-3.
[60 FR 48241, Sept. 18, 1995, as amended at 72 FR 63049, Nov. 7, 2007]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-29-1996
<CASH>                                         602,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               10,368,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   124,000
<INVENTORY>                                  3,997,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            18,053,000
<PP&E>                                       8,417,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               6,015,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              21,988,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,309,000
<BONDS>                                      7,418,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       294,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,597,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                21,988,000
<SALES>                                     14,974,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            14,974,000
<CGS>                                       10,223,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               10,223,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,028,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             666,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                851,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   272,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            579,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   579,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .19
        

</TABLE>
11.402 Factors to consider in establishing schedules. ( a ) *Supplies or services.* When establishing a contract delivery or performance schedule, consideration shall be given to applicable factors such as the— ( 1 ) Urgency of need;
( 2 ) Industry practices;
( 3 ) Market conditions;
( 4 ) Transportation time;
( 5 ) Production time;
( 6 ) Capabilities of small business concerns;
( 7 ) Administrative time for obtaining and evaluating offers and for awarding contracts;
( 8 ) Time for contractors to comply with any conditions precedent to contract performance; and
( 9 ) Time for the Government to perform its obligations under the contract; e.g., furnishing Government property.
( b ) *Construction.* When scheduling the time for completion of a construction contract, the contracting officer shall consider applicable factors such as the— ( 1 ) Nature and complexity of the project;
( 2 ) Construction seasons involved;
( 3 ) Required completion date;
( 4 ) Availability of materials and equipment;
( 5 ) Capacity of the contractor to perform; and
( 6 ) Use of multiple completion dates. (In any given contract, separate completion dates may be established for separable items of work. When multiple completion dates are used, requests for extension of time must be evaluated with respect to each item, and the affected completion dates modified when appropriate.)
[48 FR 42159, Sept. 19, 1983. Redesignated and amended at 60 FR 48241, Sept. 18, 1995]
### §499i. Accounts, records, and memoranda; duty of licensees to keep; contents; suspension of license for violation of duty

Every commission merchant, dealer, and broker shall keep such accounts, records, and memoranda as fully and correctly disclose all transactions involved in his business, including the true ownership of such business by stockholding or otherwise. If such accounts, records, and memoranda are not so kept, the Secretary may publish the facts and circumstances and/or, by order, suspend the license of the offender for a period not to exceed ninety days.

(June 10, 1930, ch. 436, §9, 46 Stat. 535.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 559 of this title.
### SUBCHAPTER II—RURAL TELEPHONE SERVICE
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6884

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

ALFREDA ROBINSON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge.

(CR-92-51-JFM, CA-97-88-JFM)

Submitted: April 16, 1998 Decided: April 29, 1998

Before WILKINS and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Alfreda Robinson, Appellant Pro Se. Andrea L. Smith, OFFICE OF THE

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997).

We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. United States v. Robinson, Nos. CR-92-51-JFM; CA-97-88-JFM

(D. Md. Apr. 29, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
###### Editorial Note on Part 724

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 724 appear at 65 FR 62616, Oct. 19, 2000.

#### § 724.119 Personal appearance discharge review.

A formal session of the NDRB convened for the purpose of reviewing an applicant's discharge on the basis of a personal appearance, as well as documentary data. The personal appearance may be by the applicant or by a representative of the applicant, or both.