alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 5.1.1

Eastern Division

Innovatio IP Ventures, LLC, Patent Litigation,

et al.

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:11−cv−09308

Honorable James F.

Holderman

JW Marriott Chicago, et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Friday, October 4, 2013:

 MINUTE entry before Honorable James F. Holderman: Innovatio's supplemental

joint motion to seal certain trial exhibits [973] is granted. Exhibit DTX 2065 shall be

maintained under seal. Enter Order Sealing Certain Trial Exhibits. Notice mailed by

judge's staff (ntf, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:11-cv-09308 Document #: 976 Filed: 10/04/13 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:41635
Proposed Rule: Revisions to Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements, and Proposed Confidentiality 

Determinations under the Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program

Meeting Documentation : Waste Sector Meeting with US EPA

Date Staff Contact 

Information (Name, 

email, phone #)

Name of Organization (Attach list of all 

attendees names and emails if possible) 

Summary of Discussion (e.g., 

applicability, reporting requirements, etc.)

Written 

Comments 

Provided?

Did they also 

submit to 

Docket?

Date sent to

EPA- CCD

November 

20, 2013

Lisa GroganMcCulloch

Grogan-groganmcculloch.lisa@epa

.gov

617-918-1481

Kerry Kelly, Waste Management

(kkelly5@wm.com)

Dina Kruger, Kruger 

Environmental Strategies

(dina@krugerstrategies.com)

Niki Wuestenberg, Republic 

Services

(nwuestenberg@republicservices.c

om)

Ray Huff, SCS Engineers

(rhuff@scsengineers.com)

Ann Germaine, National Solid 

Waste Management Association 

( agermain@envasns.org)

A meeting was held where 

stakeholders from the waste sector

provided comments regarding the 

proposed rule. The key issue 

covered was the use of the inputs 

verification tool.

No written 

comments were 

provided 

during meeting. 

Comments 

submitted to 

docket.

N/A 

(comments 

submitted to 

docket.)
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
QUARTERLY REPORT 10-K FOR THE PERIOD ENDED OCTOBER 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                   0000315374
<NAME>                  SUSAN CAMERON
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     US DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              OCT-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 NOV-1-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   OCT-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         3,495
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  17,841
<ALLOWANCES>                                   687
<INVENTORY>                                    30,767
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               52,856
<PP&E>                                         20,116
<DEPRECIATION>                                 11,165
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 69,632
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          19,580
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       595
<OTHER-SE>                                     35,553
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   69,632
<SALES>                                        88,238
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               88,238
<CGS>                                          64,064
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  64,064
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (329)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             1,293
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                2,054
<INCOME-TAX>                                   252
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            1,802
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1,802
<EPS-BASIC>                                    .30
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .30



</TABLE>
### §§612a, 612b. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 612a, act Apr. 7, 1934, ch. 103, §6, 48 Stat. 528; 1940 Reorg. Plan No. III, §5, 5 F.R. 2108, 54 Stat. 1232, authorized appropriation of $50,000,000 for purpose of dairy and beef products for distribution for relief purposes, and for elimination of diseased cattle.

Section 612b, act Aug. 24, 1935, ch. 641, §37, 49 Stat. 775, provided appropriations for elimination of disease in dairy and beef cattle to remain available until June 30, 1936.
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-04-060-CV

SHIDEH SHARIFI 	APPELLANT

	V.

INHERITANCE ADOPTIONS, INC., A 			                 APPELLEES

CORPORATION; VICKY J. PAYNE, 

IN HER CAPACITY AS AN OFFICER OF 

INHERITANCE ADOPTIONS; VICKY J.

PAYNE, INDIVIDUALLY; HANK RUGELEY 

D/B/A DAVISON RUGELEY L.L.P., A 

LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP; TONY 

HAWKINS, INDIVIDUALLY; JOANN 

HAWKINS, INDIVIDUALLY; DONALD 

L. SWEATT P.C.; WENDY L. HACKLER 

D/B/A THE LAW OFFICES OF WENDY L. 

HACKLER; AND SHANNON OWSLEY 

SWINNEY A/K/A SHANNON LARA 

SWINNEY, INDIVIDUALLY

	----------

	FROM THE 67TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

	----------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

	------------

	On March 1, 2004 and March 30, 2004, we notified appellant, in accordance with rule of appellate procedure 42.3(c), that we would dismiss this appeal unless the $125 filing fee was paid.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c).  Appellant has not paid the $125 filing fee.  See Tex. R. App. P. 5, 12.1(b).

	Because appellant has failed to comply with a requirement of the rules of

appellate procedure and the Texas Supreme Court's order of July 21, 1998,2 we dismiss the appeal.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c), 43.2(f).

	Appellant shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d).

								PER CURIAM

PANEL B:	LIVINGSTON, DAUPHINOT, and WALKER, JJ.

DELIVERED: May 27, 2004
**EXHIBIT
12.1**
 **CERTIFICATIONS**
 
 I, David
Wolfin, President of Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd., certify that:
 
 1.
    I
      have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Avino Silver & Gold
      Mines Ltd.;
 
 2.
    Based
      on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
      material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
      statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
      were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
      report;
 
 3.
    Based
      on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
      included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
      financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company
      as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
 
 4.
    The
      Company's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
      establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
      defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and
      have:
 
 (a)
    Designed
      such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
      controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
      that material information relating to the Company, including its
      consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
      prepared;
 
 (b)
    Omitted;
 
 (c)
    Evaluated
      the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures and
      presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
      disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by
      this report based on such evaluation; and
 
 (d)
    Disclosed
      in this report any change in the Company's internal control over financial
      reporting that occurred during the Company's period covered by the annual
      report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
      affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting; and
 
 5.
    The
      Company's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our
      most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
      the Company's auditors and the audit committee of the Company's board of
      directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 
 (a)
    All
      significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
      operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
      reasonably likely to adversely affect the Company's ability to record,
      process, summarize and report financial information; and
 
 (b)
    Any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the Company's internal control
      over financial reporting.
 
 Dated:
August 12, 2005      */s/
David Wolfin* ___________
 David
Wolfin, President
 (Principal
Executive Officer)
  62
1206.302-1 Only one responsible source and no other supplies or services will satisfy agency requirements. ( b ) (4) The HCA is authorized to determine that only specified makes and models of technical equipment and parts will satisfy the agency's needs under FAR 6.302-1(b)(4).
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15**  **- 7653** 

ERVIN M. LOPEZ , Petitioner

– Appellant ,
v. WARDEN LARRY CARTLEDGE , Respondent

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Florence
. Bruce H. Hendricks, District Judge. ( 4:13

- cv - 02872

- BHH )

Submitted : March 29, 2016 Decided: March 31, 2016

Before GREGORY and DUNCAN , Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Ervin M. Lopez, Appellant Pro Se. Kaycie Smith Timmons, Assistant Attorney General, Donald John Zelenka, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Ervin M. Lopez seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petit ion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (A) (2012)
. A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional rig ht.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is deba table, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Lopez has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certi ficate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal3 contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

MEMORANDUM

TO: Director, Office of Special Education Programs

FROM: The Secretary

SUBJECT: Delegation of Authority to Approve and Sign Notices for Publication in the 

Federal Register for Discretionary Grant Programs under the Individuals 

with Disabilities Education Act in the event of the Recusal of the Assistant 

Secretary for Special Education and Rehabilitative Services

I. DELEGATION

Under the authority vested in me by section 412 of the Department of Education 

Organization Act, 20 U.S.C. 3472, I hereby delegate to you, your successor in function, 

or anyone serving for you in an acting capacity or delegated the authority to perform the 

functions and duties of your position the authority to approve and sign for publication in 

the Federal Register any notice inviting applications for discretionary grant 

competitions, or any notice proposing or adopting final priorities for discretionary grant 

competitions, under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C. 1400 et 

seq., as amended through Pub. L. 114-95, in the event that the Assistant Secretary for 

Special Education and Rehabilitative Services is recused from a competition because of 

a conflict of interest or the appearance of a loss of impartiality.

Unless otherwise noted in future delegations of authority, any amendments to the 

provisions of law delegated herein are included within the scope of this delegation.

II. RESERVATIONS

Unless otherwise noted in existing or future delegations of authority, no other 

authority is delegated.

III. REDELEGATION

You may not redelegate any of the authorities delegated to you. 
Page 2 – Redelegation of Authority

IV. CERTIFICATION AND EFFECTIVE DATE

This delegation is effective upon certification by the Department’s Principal 

Delegations Control Officer. I hereby ratify actions, within the scope of this

delegation, taken by you prior to the date of certification.

___________/s________________

Betsy DeVos

OGC Clearance and Date: ____06/07/2019__________________________

Certified date: 6/11/2019

Departmental Delegations Control Officer: Jim Clemmens

Control Number: EA/EHE/106
- 1
- Alexander Van der Bellen Managing Director and

Associate General Counsel

Delta Air Lines, Inc.

1212 New York Avenue NW Washington, DC 20005

202.842.4184

sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com

May 5, 2011

Ms. Dorothy Beard Chief-Docket Operations U.S. Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE Washington, DC 20590

Re: Delta/China Eastern Codeshare Application
Docket OST-2011-0065

Dear Ms. Beard:

Enclosed for filing in the docket is an amendment to the Delta/China Eastern codeshare agreement. Thank you for your assistance.

Sincerely,

Alexander Van der Bellen Managing Director, Government Affairs
and Associate General Counsel

cc: Evelyn D. Sahr, Esq. James G. Ehrig, Esq.
```

                                                     EXHIBIT 32.1

                   Section 1350 Certification
                 By Principal Executive Officer

     I,  Daniel Greenberg, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350,  as adpoted pursuant to  Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that the periodic report, to which this Statement is
attached,  fully complies  with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d)  of  the  Securities and Exchange Act of  1934,  and the
information  contained  in  the  periodic report  to  which  this
Statement is attached, fairly presents, in all material respects,
the  financial   condition  and  results  of  operations  of  the
registrant.

     A  signed  original  of  this  written  statement  has  been
provided  to the Company and will be retained by the Company  and
furnished to the SEC upon request.

     Dated September 22, 2005

                              /s/ Daniel Greenberg
                              Daniel Greenberg
                              Chief Executive Officer
```
#### SEAMAN, Respondent, v. MICHAELS, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

January 9, 1903.)

Action by Frank Seaman against Richard Michaels.

No opinion. Judgment of the Municipal Court affirmed, with costs.
<PAGE>
                                                                EXHIBIT 10.58A


                    AMENDMENT AND ADDENDUM TO PROMISSORY NOTE

      FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned, SAC Holding Corporation, a Nevada
corporation ("Maker"), hereby amends that certain Promissory Note (the "Note")
dated as of June 8, 2001 in the original principal amount of $25,000,000 payable
to the order of Nationwide Commercial Co. ("Payee"), as follows. Capitalized
words used herein and not otherwise defined herein have the meaning ascribed to
such words in the Note.

      Section 2(a) of the Note is hereby amended to provide that effective as of
April 1, 2002, Basic Interest (which, for clarity, includes Pay Rate Interest
and Deferred Interest) is payable on a monthly basis, in arrears, on the first
business day of each month throughout the term of the Note.

      In addition, Section 2(e) of the Note is hereby amended to provide that
effective as of April 1, 2002, Cash Flow Contingent Interest is payable on a
monthly basis, in arrears, on the first business day of the month throughout the
term of the Note.

      The Note remains in full force and effect and is not amended in any
respect, except as expressly provided herein.

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned executes this Amendment and Addendum
to Promissory Note as of April 16, 2002.

                                               SAC Holding Corporation


                                               By: _____________________________
                                                    Bruce Brockhagen, Secretary


      Payee hereby agrees and consents to the above-described amendment to the
Note this 16th day of April, 2002.


                                               Nationwide Commercial Co.


                                               By: _____________________________
                                                     Gary B. Horton, Secretary
EXHIBIT
13.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of Avino Silver
& Gold Mines Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the twelve months ended
December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the “Report”).  I, David Wolfin, Principal Executive
Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of
my knowledge and belief:





(1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.








Date: February 10, 2010/s/ David
    WolfinDavid
      Wolfin,
                Principal
      Executive Officer
# FY 2023 Congressional APT

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION FISCAL YEAR 2017 OMB REQUEST&11(in thousands of dollars)	September 3, 2015, 3:56 PM

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION FISCAL YEAR 2017 OMB REQUEST&11(in thousands of dollars)	August 7, 2015, 6:40 AM

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION FISCAL YEAR 2017 OMB REQUEST&11(in thousands of dollars)	July 16, 2015 10:56 am

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION FISCAL YEAR 2017 OMB REQUEST&11(in thousands of dollars)	August 17, 2015, 10:16 AM

&"-,Regular"DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION FISCAL YEAR 2023 CONGRESSIONAL ACTION&10(in thousands of dollars)	

&20 	&P

&20 	&P

&20 	&P

&20 	&P

&P	3/28/2022
### §2257. Interchangeability of funds for miscellaneous expenses and general expenses

Not to exceed 7 per centum of the amounts appropriated for any fiscal year for the miscellaneous expenses of the work of any bureau, division, or office of the Department of Agriculture shall be available interchangeably for expenditures on the objects included within the general expenses of such bureau, division, or office, but no more than 7 per centum shall be added to any one item of appropriation except in cases of extraordinary emergency.

(Sept. 21, 1944, ch. 412, title VII, §702(b), 58 Stat. 741.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

This section was enacted as part of the Department of Agriculture Organic Act of 1944.

Section was formerly classified to section 572 of Title 5 prior to the general revision and enactment of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees, by Pub. L. 89–554, §1, Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 378.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 EDUCATIONAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. In connection with the Quarterly Report of Educational Development Corporation
(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended August 31, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, W. Curtis Fossett, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15
(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. Date October 15, 2004
    
    By
    
    
    
    /s/ W. Curtis FossettW. Curtis Fossett
Chief Financial Officer
 The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate
document. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.