alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### 12.213 Other commercial practices.

It is a common practice in the commercial marketplace for both the buyer and seller to propose terms and conditions written from their particular perspectives. The terms and conditions prescribed in this part seek to balance the interests of both the buyer and seller. These terms and conditions are generally appropriate for use in a wide range of acquisitions. However, market research may indicate other commercial practices that are appropriate for the acquisition of the particular item. These practices should be considered for incorporation into the solicitation and contract if the contracting officer determines them appropriate in concluding a business arrangement satisfactory to both parties and not otherwise precluded by law or Executive order.

[62 FR 264, Jan. 2, 1997]
### §2613. Authority for issuance and amendment of plan

To effectuate the declared policy of this chapter, the Secretary shall, subject to the provisions of this chapter, issue and from time to time amend, orders applicable to handlers and importers and shall have authority to issue orders authorizing the collection of assessments on potatoes handled or imported under the provisions of this chapter, and to authorize the use of such funds to provide research, development, advertising, and promotion of potatoes in a manner prescribed in this chapter. Any order issued by the Secretary under this chapter shall hereinafter in this chapter be referred to as a "plan". Any such plan shall be applicable to potatoes produced in the 50 States of the United States and in foreign countries, if importers are subject to a plan and such potatoes are imported into the United States.

(Pub. L. 91–670, title III, §304, Jan. 11, 1971, 84 Stat. 2042; Pub. L. 101–624, title XIX, §1938, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 3866.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1990—Pub. L. 101–624 substituted "handlers and importers" for "persons engaged in the handling of potatoes (hereinafter referred to as handlers)", inserted "or imported", substituted "50" for "forty-eight contiguous", and inserted before period at end "and in foreign countries, if importers are subject to a plan and such potatoes are imported into the United States".
#### In the Matter of Leonard M. Karmel (Admitted to Practice as Leonard Murray Karmel), an Attorney, Respondent. Grievance Committee for the Second and Eleventh Judicial Districts, Petitioner.

Second Department,

April 9, 1979

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Frank A. Finnerty, Jr. (Gary L. Casella*of counsel), for petitioner.

*McCarvey & Steele (Spencer Steele*of counsel), for respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

*Per Curiam.*

The respondent was admitted to practice by this court on *198December 19, 1956 under the name of Leonard Murray Karmel.

Pursuant to a motion by the petitioner, an order was entered by this court on December 28, 1978 suspending respondent from the practice of law pending determination of the charges of professional misconduct alleged against him.

On February 6, 1979, respondent entered pleas of guilty to three class D felonies, namely, one count of forgery in the second degree and two counts of grand larceny in the second degree.

An attorney, shall, upon conviction of a felony, cease to be an attorney and counselor at law (Judiciary Law, § 90, subd 4).

Respondent tendered his resignation dated December 11, 1978. Said resignation was not received by petitioner until February 8, 1979, two days after the pleas of guilty were entered by the respondent. Assuming, however, that the resignation had been timely tendered, this court would nevertheless have not accepted said resignation in view of the then pending indictment.

The original petition in this matter charged, *inter alia,*that more than $200,000 belonging to the respondent’s clients, was either converted by him or unaccounted for. In the respondent’s answer to the petition he admitted the substantial conversion of his clients’ funds. This led to his suspension from the practice of law pending the outcome of the disciplinary hearing.

Upon respondent’s subsequent conviction (see CPL 1.20, subd 13) of three class D felonies, on his pleas of guilty, he ceases to be an attorney and counselor at law in this State.

Accordingly, petitioner’s motion is granted. The clerk of this court is directed to strike respondent’s name from the roll of attorneys and counselors at law forthwith. Respondent’s cross motion is denied and respondent’s resignation is not accepted.

Mollen, P. J., Hopkins, Damiani, Titone and O’Connor, JJ., concur.
THE SECRETARY OF EDUCATION

WASHINGTON, D.C 2020

MEMORANDUM

TO: The Designated Agency Ethics Official 

Deputy Agency Ethics Officials

THROUGH: The General Counsel 

FROM: The Secretary

SUBJECT: Delegation of Authority

I. DELEGATION

Under the authority vested in me by Section 412 of the Department of Education 

Organization Act (DEOA), 20 U.S.C. Section 3472, Public Law 96-88, I hereby 

delegate to you the authority to serve as "agency designees" for the purposes of 5 

C.F.R. Sections 2635.403(b), 2635.502(a), (c), (d), and (e), 2635.605(b), and 

2635.606(b). Unless otherwise noted in future delegations of authority, 

amendments to the authority delegated herein are included within the scope of this 

delegation.

II. RESERVATIONS

None.

III. REDELEGATION

This authority may not be further redelegated.

IV. CERTIFICATION AND EFFECTIVE DATE

This delegation is effective upon certification by the Department's Principal 

Delegation Control Officer.

 /s/ 
 Richard W. Riley

OGC Clearance and Date: /s/ R. Wexler, 4/27/93

Certified Date: 5/10/93

Departmental Delegations Control Officer: /s/ Wilma J. Hodo

Control No. EGB/EGB-1/62
Case: 1:11-cv-08987 Document #: 41 Filed: 01/04/13 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:355
# FY25 President's Budget Request

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION FISCAL YEAR 2025 PRESIDENT'S BUDGET&11(in thousands of dollars)	

 &P
### §595. Fees for inspection and certification; certificates as prima facie evidence

For inspecting and certifying the grade, quality, or condition of grapes or plums the Secretary shall cause to be collected a reasonable fee which shall, as nearly as may be, cover the cost of the service rendered: Provided, That when cooperative arrangements satisfactory to the Secretary, or his designated representative, for carrying out the purposes of this chapter cannot be made the fees collected hereunder in such cases shall be available until expended to defray the cost of the service rendered, and in such cases the limitations on the amounts expended for the purchase and maintenance of motor-propelled passenger-carrying vehicles shall not be applicable: Provided further, That certificates issued by the authorized agents of the United States Department of Agriculture shall be received in all courts of the United States as prima facie evidence of the truth of the statements therein contained.

(Pub. L. 86–687, §5, Sept. 2, 1960, 74 Stat. 734.)
Exhibit
      32.1





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF**


**THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Composite Technology Corporation (the "Company") Annual
      Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Benton
      H Wilcoxon, Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer of the
      Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to


Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material respects
      the
      financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





*/s/
                Benton H Wilcoxon*
              
              *Benton
                H Wilcoxon*
              *Chief
                Executive Officer*
              *(Principal
                Executive Officer)*
              *Acting
                Chief Financial Officer*
              *(Principal
                Financial Officer)*
              
              *December
                22, 2006*
**EXHIBIT 4.14**

****

|   |
|--------|
|        |
|        |

 

 

|   |
|--------|
|        |
|        |

 

 

|   |
|--------|
|        |
|        |

 

 

|   |
|--------|
|        |
|        |

 

 

|   |
|--------|
|        |
|        |

 

 

|   |
|--------|
|        |
|        |

 

 

|   |
|--------|
|        |
|        |

 

----
Exhibit 21

List of Subsidiaries

Subsidiaries of International Bancshares Corporation

|Name                       |  | Business              |  | % of Ownership |  
|-------------------------- |  | --------------------- |  | -------------- | -
|IBC Subsidiary Corporation |  | Bank Holding Company  |  | 100            | %
|IBC Life Insurance Company |  | Credit Life Insurance |  | 100            | %
|IBC Trading Company        |  | Export Trading        |  | 100            | %
|IBC Capital Corporation    |  | Investments           |  | 100            | %

Subsidiaries of IBC Subsidiary Corporation

|Name                                        |  | Business                        |  | % of Ownership |  
|------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------- |  | -------------- | -
|International Bank of Commerce              |  | State Bank                      |  | 100            | %
|Commerce Bank                               |  | State Bank                      |  | 100            | %
|International Bank of Commerce, Zapata      |  | State Bank                      |  | 100            | %
|International Bank of Commerce, Brownsville |  | State Bank                      |  | 100            | %
|Gulfstar Group I, Ltd.                      |  | Investment and Merchant Banking |  | 70             | %
|Gulfstar Group II, Ltd.                     |  | Investment Banking              |  | 70             | %

---



QuickLinks
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 21

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

The Company or one of its wholly-owned subsidiaries beneficially owns the
following percent of the outstanding capital stock, voting securities and
interests of each of the corporations and limited partnerships listed below.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                 STATE OR OTHER
                                                                JURISDICTION OF            PERCENT
NAME                                                             INCORPORATION              OWNED
-----------------------------------                             ----------------------------------
<S>                                                             <C>                        <C>
City Bank                                                          Hawaii                    100.0%
     CB Technology, Inc.                                           Hawaii                    100.0%
     Citibank Properties, Inc.                                     Hawaii                     99.9%
     ISL Capital Corporation                                     California                  100.0%
     Pacific Access Mortgage, LLC                                  Hawaii                     50.0%

Datatronix Financial Services, Inc.                                Hawaii                    100.0%

O.R.E., Inc.                                                       Hawaii                    100.0%
</TABLE>

All subsidiaries were included in the consolidated financial statements of the
Registrant.
#### § 552.80 Suspension period.

All solicitation privileges suspended by installation commanders will be for a specific time. Normally, it will not exceed 2 years. When the suspension period expires, the agent may reapply for permission to solicit at the installation authorizing the denial or suspension. Requests for suspension periods in excess of 2 years will be sent with the complete case to HQDA (DAAG-PSI) WASH DC 20314, for approval. Lesser suspension may be imposed pending decision.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

February 28, 2014

s0224 

# Order

Clerk February 28, 2014

148284

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIG AN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 148284

COA: 310325

Oakland CC: 2011

- 236105

- FH

MARCUS MANDELLE KELLEY,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 24, 2013

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
#### 1317.105 Policy.
EXHIBITE

Case: 1:12-cv-00163 Document #: 1-5 Filed: 01/10/12 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:21
0012193

Certificate of Vehicle Registration ProductNumber RegiotraionN~

.•. 46871093026 L.I

PlaMNu1~~~~UTI~;o

G<_W~I~ Period Color A.•• No.

A MAROONIBURGUN )y

V_ kIenIiIIcorionN_ o YON Make E.<piralim Oat•• Amount_

l!§' 2009 11f30/2012 s 110.00

----.

INCLUDES MUNICIPAL OR COUNTY FEE YEAR

This ~oIIon CertJ1icodot is not ••

TIIIo. Not Valid to< Traml", 01

~".

Corotacl!he 41~·266-1000

Division 01 Me\o( 608-266-1466

VahicJesBt

www.dot.wiSCOl1sin.gov

COENEN TRACY L

111 E WISCONSIN AVE .1230

MILWAUKEE, WI 53202

Case: 1:12-cv-00163 Document #: 1-5 Filed: 01/10/12 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:22
### §1736h. Congressional consultation on bilateral commodity supply agreements

As soon as practicable before the Government of the United States enters into any bilateral international agreement, other than a treaty, involving a commitment on the part of the United States to assure access by a foreign country or instrumentality thereof to United States agricultural commodities or products thereof on a commercial basis, the President is encouraged to notify and consult with the appropriate committees of Congress for the purpose of setting forth in detail the terms of and reasons for negotiating such agreement.

(Pub. L. 97–98, title XII, §1202, Dec. 22, 1981, 95 Stat. 1275.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Agriculture and Food Act of 1981, and not as part of the Food for Peace Act which comprises this chapter.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Dec. 22, 1981, see section 1801 of Pub. L. 97–98, set out as a note under section 4301 of this title.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-40196

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

EFRAIN HERNANDEZ-GONZALEZ,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:09-CR-1520-1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, GARZA, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Efrain HernandezGonzalez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance

with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Hernandez-Gonzalez has not

filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief

discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for

leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities

herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

February 15, 2011

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 10-40196 Document: 00511382105 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/15/2011
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsThermal stability of the microstructure of an aged Nb-Zr-C alloyThe effects of thermal aging with and without an applied stress on the microstructure of a Nb-Zr-C alloy containing 0.9 wt percent Zr and 0.06 wt percent C were studied. Chemical analysis, metallographic examination, energy dispersive x-ray spectra of the bulk material, and chemical and x-ray analyses of the phase-extracted residue were used to characterize the microstructure. The samples examined were from a creep strength study involving hot and cold working, and various combinations of exposure to temperatures ranging from 1350 to 1755 K with and without applied load for times as long as 34,000 plus hours. The results showed that the initial microstructure consisted primarily of orthorombic precipitates of Nb sub 2 C which were partially or completely transformed to face-centered cubic carbides of nb and Zr, (Zr, Nb)C, upon prolonged exposure to elevated temperatures. Furthermore, it was found that the microstructure of the alloy is extremely stable owing to the very finely distributed precipitates throughout its matrix and along the grain boundaries. The lattice parameters of the cubic carbides were determed to vary from 0.458 to 0.465 nm as the Zr/Nb ratio varied from 38/62 to 75/25.Document ID19910005141Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeConference PaperAuthorsUz, Mehmet*(Lafayette Coll. Easton, PA., United States)*Titran, Robert H.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateOctober 1, 1990Subject CategoryMetallic MaterialsReport/Patent NumberE-5829NAS 1.15:103647NASA-TM-103647DOE/NASA/16310-14Meeting InformationMeeting: Symposium on Space Nuclear Power SystemsLocation: Albuquerque, NMCountry: United StatesStart Date: January 7, 1991End Date: January 10, 1991Sponsors:New Mexico Univ.Accession Number91N14454Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: DE-A103-86SF-16310PROJECT: RTOP 590-13-11Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19910005141.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
## IN THE COURT O F CRIMINA L A PPEA LS O F T E X A S NO. WR-80,123-01
EX P ARTE JACK

MANISCALCO JR., Applicant
ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. 11-DCR- 56387HC1 IN THE 434 DISTRICT COURT T H F ROM F ORT BE ND COUNTY
Per curiam . O P I N I O N
This is a post-conviction application for a writ of habea s corpus fo rw ar d ed to this Court pursuant to T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 11.07, § 3, et seq. Applicant was convicted of the state jail felony offe nse of interfe renc e with an emer g ency call, and punishment was assessed at six months’ confine ment. The Four

teenth Court of Appea ls a ffirme d his c onviction. Manisculco v. State , No. 14-11-00594- CR (Tex. App.–Houston [ 14 ] March 19, 2013). t h The habea s application was filed in the trial court on J une 25, 2013 and this Court rec eived it on August 22, 2013. On September 1 8 , 2 0 1 3, this Court issued an opinion granting relief
. Howeve r, on September 4, 2013, while the application was still pending in this Court, Applicant wasrele ased from custody pursuant to his motion for “shock probation”. This Court was not notified of

Applicant’s r elea se until September 23, 2013. This Court had jurisdiction to consider the 11.07 habea s application at the time it was filed, but the order g ranting shock probation meant t h e co n v iction was no longe r final. After
rec onsideration on our own motion, the C ourt withdraws it s p re v i o u s opinion and subst itutes this opinion. Applicant’s application is hereby dismiss ed. DO NOT PUBL I SH DEL IVERED: Octobe r 23, 2013
EXHIBIT
32.1





Section
1350 Certification


By
Principal Executive Officer





I, Daniel
Greenberg, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the quarterly report
on Form 10-Q of Electro Rent Corporation (the “Company”) for the quarter ended
February 28, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in
such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.





A
signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC upon
request.





Date:  April
3, 2009





/s/ Daniel GreenbergDaniel
      Greenberg
                Chief
      Executive Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

CHARLES CHATT, et al., )

)

Plaintiffs, )

)

v. ) No. 11 C 9267

)

J.B. HUNT TRANSPORT, INC., etc.,)

)

Defendant. )

MEMORANDUM ORDER

J.B. Hunt Transport, Inc. (“J.B. Hunt”) has filed its Answer

to the Complaint brought against it by Charles and Linda Chatt. 

This memorandum order is issued sua sponte to address matters in

that responsive pleading that call for current attention.

To begin with, J.B. Hunt’s counsel are among the lawyers who

seemingly seek to invoke the disclaimer provisions of Fed. R.

Civ. P. (“Rule”) 8(b)(5) without having read that Rule. At least

it is difficult to draw any other conclusion from counsel’s

failure to follow its plainly-marked-out roadmap (see Answer ¶¶3

and 14, the latter of which is contained in the response to each

of the two counts of the Complaint).

Those offending paragraphs are therefore stricken, but with

leave granted to file an amendment to the Answer (not a selfcontained Amended Answer) correcting the flawed response on or

before February 21, 2012. No charge is to be made to J.B. Hunt

by its counsel for the added work and expense incurred in

correcting counsel’s errors.
On the plus side, however, J.B. Hunt has admitted its lack

of due care in the respects alleged by Complaint ¶¶13.b and 13.d. 

That being so, it would appear that early efforts at possible

settlement would be the most appropriate course for the litigants

to take (for with liability acknowledged, the parties can focus

solely on the damages issue). Although the next status hearing

date has previously been set for May 2, it is hoped that counsel

might bring the matter on much earlier, either to report on

progress toward resolution or, if appropriate, to seek an order

of reference to the assigned Magistrate Judge to assist them in

that respect.

________________________________________

Milton I. Shadur

Senior United States District Judge

Date: February 8, 2012

2