alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 723.9 Reconsideration.

After final adjudication, further consideration will be granted only upon presentation by the applicant of new and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. New evidence is defined as evidence not previously considered by the Board and not reasonably available to the applicant at the time of the previous application. Evidence is material if it is likely to have a substantial effect on the outcome. All requests for further consideration will be initially screened by the Executive Director of the Board to determine whether new and material evidence or other matter (including, but not limited to, any factual allegations or arguments why the relief should be granted) has been submitted by the applicant. If such evidence or other matter has been submitted, the request shall be forwarded to the Board for a decision. If no such evidence or other matter has been submitted, the applicant will be informed that his/her request was not considered by the Board because it did not contain new and material evidence or other matter.
### §3159. Land-grant designation

#### (a) Prohibition on designation

#### (1) In general

Notwithstanding any other provision of law and except as provided in paragraphs (2) and (3), beginning on December 20, 2018, no additional entity may be designated as eligible to receive funds under a covered program.

#### (2) 1994 institutions

The prohibition under paragraph (1) with respect to the designation of an entity eligible to receive funds under a covered program shall not apply in the case of the certification of a 1994 Institution under section 2 of Public Law 87–788 (commonly known as the "McIntire-Stennis Cooperative Forestry Act") (16 U.S.C. 582a–1).

#### (3) Extraordinary circumstances

In the case of extraordinary circumstances or a situation that would lead to an inequitable result, as determined by the Secretary, the Secretary may determine that an entity designated after December 20, 2018, is eligible to receive funds under a covered program.

#### (b) State funding

No State shall receive an increase in funding under a covered program as a result of the State's designation of additional entities as eligible to receive such funding.

#### (c) Covered program defined

For purposes of this section, the term "covered program" means agricultural research, extension, education, and related programs or grants established or available under any of the following:

(1) Subsections (b), (c), and (d) of section 343 of this title.

(2) The Hatch Act of 1887 (7 U.S.C. 361a et seq.).

(3) Sections 3221, 3222, and 3222b of this title.

(4) Public Law 87–788 (commonly known as the McIntire-Stennis Cooperative Forestry Act; 16 U.S.C. 582a et seq.).

#### (d) Rule of construction

Nothing in this section shall be construed as limiting eligibility for a capacity and infrastructure program specified in section 6971(f)(1)(C) of this title that is not a covered program.

(Pub. L. 95–113, title XIV, §1419D, as added Pub. L. 115–334, title VII, §7111, Dec. 20, 2018, 132 Stat. 4784.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Hatch Act of 1887, referred to in subsec. (c)(2), is act Mar. 2, 1887, ch. 314, 24 Stat. 440, which is classified generally to sections 361a to 361i of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 361a of this title and Tables.

Public Law 87–788, referred to in subsec. (c)(4), is Pub. L. 87–788, Oct. 10, 1962, 76 Stat. 806, popularly known as the "McIntire-Stennis Act of 1962" and also as the "McIntire-Stennis Cooperative Forestry Act", which is classified generally to subchapter III (§582a et seq.) of chapter 3 of Title 16, Conservation. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 582a of Title 16 and Tables.
### §1342a. National cotton production goal

The Secretary shall, not later than November 15, of the calendar years 1970 through 1976 proclaim a national cotton production goal for the 1971 and subsequent crops of upland cotton. The national cotton production goal for any year shall be the number of bales of upland cotton (standard bales of four hundred and eighty pounds net weight) equal to the estimated domestic consumption and estimated exports for the marketing year beginning in the calendar year for which such national cotton production goal is proclaimed, plus an allowance of not less than 5 per centum of such estimated consumption and estimated exports for market expansion except that the Secretary shall make such adjustments in the amount of such production goal as he determines necessary after taking into consideration the estimated stocks of upland cotton in the United States (including the qualities of such stocks) and stocks in foreign countries, which would be available for the marketing year, to assure the maintenance of adequate but not excessive carryover stocks in the United States (not less than 50 per centum of the average offtake for the three preceding marketing years) to provide a continuous and stable supply of the different qualities of upland cotton needed in the United States and in foreign cotton consuming countries and, in addition, to provide an adequate reserve for purposes of national security.

(Feb. 16, 1938, ch. 30, title III, §342a, as added Pub. L. 91–524, title VI, §601(2), Nov. 30, 1970, 84 Stat. 1371; amended Pub. L. 93–86, §1(19)(B), Aug. 10, 1973, 87 Stat. 233.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1973—Pub. L. 93–86 substituted "1970 through 1976" for "1970, 1971, and 1972".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Pub. L. 91–524, title VI, §601, Nov. 30, 1970, 84 Stat. 1371, provided that this section is effective beginning with the 1971 crop of upland cotton.

#### Inapplicability of Section

Section inapplicable to 2014 through 2018 crops of covered commodities, cotton, and sugar and inapplicable to milk during period beginning Feb. 7, 2014, through Dec. 31, 2018, see section 9092(a)(1) of this title.

Section inapplicable to 2008 through 2012 crops of covered commodities, peanuts, and sugar and inapplicable to milk during period beginning June 18, 2008, through Dec. 31, 2012, see section 8782(a)(1) of this title.

Section inapplicable to 2002 through 2007 crops of covered commodities, peanuts, and sugar and inapplicable to milk during period beginning May 13, 2002, through Dec. 31, 2007, see section 7992(a)(1) of this title.

Section inapplicable to 1996 through 2001 crops of loan commodities, peanuts, and sugar and inapplicable to milk during period beginning Apr. 4, 1996, and ending Dec. 31, 2002, see section 7301(a)(1)(A) of this title.
**EXHIBIT
12.2**


**CERTIFICATION**





I, David
Wolfin, President of Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd., certify
that:





1.  I have
reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd.;





2.
    Based
      on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
      material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
      statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
      were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
      report;





3.
    Based
      on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
      included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
      financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company
      as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;





4.
    The
      Company's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
      establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
      defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and
      have:





(a)
    Designed
      such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
      controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
      that material information relating to the Company, including its
      consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
      prepared;





(b)
    Omitted;





(c)
    Evaluated
      the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures and
      presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
      disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by
      this report based on such evaluation; and





(d)
    Disclosed
      in this report any change in the Company's internal control over financial
      reporting that occurred during the Company's most recent annual report
      that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
      affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting; and





5.
    The
      Company's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our
      most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
      the Company's auditors and the audit committee of the Company's board of
      directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





(a)
    All
      significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
      operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
      reasonably likely to adversely affect the Company's ability to record,
      process, summarize and report financial information; and





(b)
    Any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the Company's internal control
      over financial reporting.





Dated:
August 12, 2005     */s/
David Wolfin* ________


David Wolfin, President


(Principal Financial Officer)











58
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Cost of Living in 1941

              																	United States. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 						*Cost of Living in 1941 : Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 710*,												Washington, D.C: 								G.P.O., 										1942,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/4209,			accessed on September 15, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 170 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 170

 Recognizing it is the congressional intent of the Affordable Care Act 
  that enhanced Federal medical assistance percentage funds are to be 
directly shared with the counties in States with a Medicaid local share 
                              requirement.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 27, 2023

 Mr. Molinaro (for himself, Ms. Tenney, and Mr. Langworthy) submitted 
the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Energy 
                              and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Recognizing it is the congressional intent of the Affordable Care Act 
  that enhanced Federal medical assistance percentage funds are to be 
directly shared with the counties in States with a Medicaid local share 
                              requirement.

Whereas county governments that receive enhanced Federal medical assistance 
        percentage (eFMAP) funds use such funds to deliver critical services 
        through Medicaid to vulnerable and underserved populations, such as 
        mental health services, home health services, long-term care services, 
        and other necessary support services;
Whereas, since the inception of the eFMAP, States have been sharing such funds 
        with the counties to deliver such care to underserved communities;
Whereas New York State Governor Kathy Hochul's latest budget withholds a 
        percentage of funds that are supposed to be given directly to the 
        counties and absorbs such amount into the State budget;
Whereas 18 States mandate counties contribute to the non-Federal share of 
        Medicaid costs, such as California, Nevada, Utah, Colorado, Arizona, New 
        Mexico, Minnesota, Michigan, Illinois, Ohio, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, 
        New York, Vermont, Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina, and 
        Florida;
Whereas such withholding of eFMAP funds from the New York State counties adds up 
        to $1,000,000,000;
Whereas New York State's actions to withhold eFMAP funds is preventing counties 
        from providing the necessary support to vulnerable children and seniors;
Whereas the withholding of eFMAP funds from counties will force county 
        governments to raise property taxes to make up for such revenue loss; 
        and
Whereas counties should be reconciled and retroactively receive such eFMAP funds 
        to ensure Medicaid-dependent populations receive the support and care 
        they need: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives recognizes that State 
governments that require a local county share should not withhold such 
funds from counties to make up for States' Medicaid budgetary 
shortfalls.
                                 <all>
```
### §4402. Definitions

As used in this chapter—

(1) The term "agreement" means the Agreement on the International Carriage of Perishable Foodstuffs and on the Special Equipment to be Used for Such Carriage, and the annexes and the appendices thereto, done at Geneva, September 1, 1970, under the auspices of the Economic Commission for Europe of the United Nations.

(2) The term "contracting party" means any country that is eligible under article 9 of the agreement and that has complied with the terms of such article.

(3) The term "equipment" means the special transport equipment that complies with the definitions and standards set forth in annex 1 to the agreement, including, but not limited to, railway cars, trucks, trailers, semitrailers, and intermodal freight containers that are insulated only, or insulated and equipped with a refrigerating, mechanically refrigerating, or heating appliance.

(4) The term "perishable foodstuffs" means quick deep-frozen and frozen food products listed in annex 2 and food products listed in annex 3 to the agreement.

(5) The term "international carriage" means transportation of perishable foodstuffs if such foodstuffs are loaded in equipment or the equipment containing them is loaded onto a rail or road vehicle, in the territory of any country and such foodstuffs are, or the equipment containing them is, unloaded in the territory of another country that is a contracting party, where such transportation is by—

(A) rail,

(B) road,

(C) any combination of rail and road, or

(D) any sea crossing of less than one hundred and fifty kilometers, if preceded or followed by one or more land journeys as referred to in clauses (A), (B), and (C) of this paragraph, and the perishable foodstuffs are shipped in the same equipment used for such land journeys without transloading of such foodstuffs.

In the case of any transportation that involves one or more sea crossings other than as specified in clause (D) of this paragraph, each land journey shall be considered separately.

(6) The term "United States" means the fifty States of the United States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Guam, American Samoa, the Virgin Islands of the United States, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, and any other territory or possession of the United States.

(Pub. L. 97–325, §3, Oct. 15, 1982, 96 Stat. 1603.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 97–325, Oct. 15, 1982, 96 Stat. 1603, known as the International Carriage of Perishable Foodstuffs Act, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 4401 of this title and Tables.
#### § 855.10 Purpose of use.

The purposes of use normally associated with civil aircraft operations at Air Force airfields are listed in Table 1. Requests for use for purposes other than those listed will be considered and may be approved if warranted by unique circumstances. A separate DD Form 2401 is required for each purpose of use. (Users can have multiple DD Forms 2401 that are covered by a single DD Form 2400 and DD Form 2402.)
Exhibit 23.5

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



 We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement Form F-3 of our report dated March 26, 2004, except for Note 24, as to
which the date is June 15, 2004, relating to the consolidated financial
statements of OJSC Mobile TeleSystems and subsidiaries, which appears in the
Annual Report on Form 20-F/A of Deutsche Telekom AG for the year ended December
31, 2003. We also consent to the references to us under the headings "Experts"
in such Registration Statement.


/s/ ZAO Deloitte & Touche CIS


September 8, 2004
Moscow, Russia
Exhibit 32(b)








CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


FOR PPL ELECTRIC UTILITIES CORPORATION'S 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2009





In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of PPL Electric Utilities Corporation ("PPL Electric") for the year ended December 31, 2009, as amended by Amendment No.1 thereto filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Covered Report"), I, the principal financial officer of PPL Electric, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify that:





·
The Covered Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and·
The information contained in the Covered Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of PPL Electric.











Date:  April 27, 2010
/s/ Vincent SorgiVincent Sorgi

Vice President and Controller

PPL Electric Utilities Corporation





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to PPL Electric and will be retained by PPL Electric and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
### §§5215, 5216. Repealed. Pub. L. 101–624, title XV, §1571, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 3702

Section 5215, Pub. L. 100–418, title IV, §4205, Aug. 23, 1988, 102 Stat. 1392, authorized Secretary of Agriculture to contract with individuals for services to be performed outside United States. See section 5673 of this title.

Section 5216, Pub. L. 100–418, title IV, §4206, Aug. 23, 1988, 102 Stat. 1392, provided for establishment of a trade assistance office within Foreign Agricultural Service.
### §439c. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, July 2, 1948, ch. 818, §4, 62 Stat. 1235, related to powers of Secretary of Agriculture under former sections 439 to 439e of this title, and was omitted from the Code as obsolete.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ex rel.)

TREMAYNE CORA #B79855, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. ) No. 11 C 9230

)

MARCUS HARDY, )

)

Respondent. )

MEMORANDUM ORDER

Respondent Warden Marcus Hardy has filed a detailed 35-page

Answer to the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (“Petition”)

filed by Tremayne Cora (“Cora”), supplementing that Answer with

extensive exhibits. Under Rule 5(e) of the Rules Governing

Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts, Cora is

given the right to “submit a reply to the respondent’s answer or

other pleading within a time fixed by the judge.”

In light of the extensive nature of the Answer and exhibits

filed by Assistant Attorney General David Iskowich on behalf of

Warden Hardy, this Court has determined that Cora’s earlier

motion for the appointment of pro bono counsel is granted, and

the following member of the trial bar is appointed for that

purpose:

Standish E. Willis, Esq.

39 South LaSalle Street

Suite 1210

Chicago IL 60603

Attorney Willis is ordered to file Cora’s reply on or before
June 25, 2012, with the understanding that if attorney Willis

finds that more time is needed this Court would be receptive to a

request for an extension of that due date.1

________________________________________

Milton I. Shadur

Senior United States District Judge

Date: May 23, 2012

 Because of the voluminous nature of respondent Warden 1

Hardy’s exhibits, photocopying them would be both burdensome and

expensive. Attorney Willis will be welcome to borrow this

Court’s chambers copies for his use in preparing the reply.

2