alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Sheet1

State Agency Program Migrant Student Education

Impact Aid Basic Support Payments

Impact Aid Payments for Children with Disabilities

Impact Aid Construction

English Language Acquisition

Grants for Infants and Families

Career and Technical Education State Grants

Federal Pell Grants

Federal Supplemental Educational Opportunity Grants

Federal Work Study

Rural and Low Income Schools Program

Indian Student Education Grants to Local Educational Agencies

Protection and Advocacy of Individual Rights

Supported Employment State Grants

Independent Living Services for Older Blind Individuals

State Agency Program--Neglected and Delinquent Children and Youth Education

State Assessments

Adult Basic and Literacy Education State Grants

Federal Direct Student Loan Program

Grand Total

School Improvement

Grants to Local Educational Agencies

State or Other Area

Arizona

Arkansas

California

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

Compiled for posting on the WEB by the Budget Service on December 14, 2016.

Vocational Rehabilitation State Grants

Small Rural School Achievement Program

Homeless Children and Youth Education

Special Education -Grants to States

English Literacy and Civics Education State Grants

Supporting Effective Instruction State Grants

Special Education Preschool Grants

Client Assistance State Grants

State or Other Area

State or Other Area

State or Other Area

State or Other Area

State or Other Area

State or Other Area

State or Other Area

State or Other Area

State or Other Area

State or Other Area

State or Other Area

State or Other Area

State or Other Area

State or Other Area

State or Other Area

State or Other Area

State or Other Area

State or Other Area

State or Other Area

State or Other Area

State or Other Area

State or Other Area

State or Other Area

State or Other Area

State or Other Area

State or Other Area

State or Other Area

State or Other Area

State or Other Area

State or Other Area

State or Other Area

21st Century Community Learning Centers

Mathematics and Science Partnerships

State or Other Area

Student Support and Academic Enrichment State Grants
#### In the Matter of Regal Wine & Liquor Store, Inc., v. State Liquor Authority.

Motion for a preference granted to the extent of placing the above-entitled proceeding at the head of the Enumerated Calendar of this court for February 7, 1961. Concur — Breitel, J. P. Rabin, McNally, Stevens and Eager, JJ.
### §4315. Certification of organizations; applicable criteria and considerations

The eligibility of any organization to represent producers of flowers and plants of any producing area of the United States or importers of flowers and plants, for purposes of requesting the issuance of an order under section 4304 of this title, or making nominations under section 4306(2) of this title, shall be certified by the Secretary. Certification shall be based, in addition to other available information, upon a factual report submitted by the organization which shall contain information deemed relevant and specified by the Secretary for the making of such determination, including, but not limited to, the following:

(1) geographic territory covered by the organization's active membership;

(2) nature and size of the organization's active membership, the proportion of such active membership accounted for by producers and importers, and information as to the volume of production by State or the volume of importation by country accounted for by the organization's producer and importer members;

(3) the extent to which the producer and importer membership of such organization is represented in setting the organization's policies;

(4) evidence of stability and permanency of the organization;

(5) sources from which the organization's operating funds are derived;

(6) functions of the organization;

(7) whether the majority of the governing board of the organization is composed of producers and importers; and

(8) the organization's ability and willingness to further the aims and objectives of this chapter.

The primary consideration in determining the eligibility of any organization shall be whether its membership consists of a substantial number of producers and importers who produce and import a substantial volume of flowers and plants. The Secretary shall certify any organization which is found to be eligible under this section, and the Secretary's determination as to eligibility shall be final. Whenever more than one organization is certified in any geographic area, such organizations may caucus to determine the area's nominations under section 4306(2) of this title.

(Pub. L. 97–98, title XVII, §1716, Dec. 22, 1981, 95 Stat. 1357.)
### §6614. Action plan implementation

#### (a) In general

Action plans shall be implemented, insofar as practicable, to upgrade existing industries to use natural resources more efficiently and to expand the economic base of rural communities so as to alleviate or reduce their dependence on National Forest System land resources.

#### (b) Assistance

To implement action plans, the Secretary may make grants and enter into cooperative agreements and contracts to provide necessary technical and related assistance. Such grants, cooperative agreements, and contracts may be with the affected rural community, State and local governments, universities, corporations, and other persons.

#### (c) Limitation

The Federal contribution to the overall implementation of an action plan shall not exceed 80 percent of the total cost of the plan, including administrative and other costs. In calculating the Federal contribution, the Secretary shall take into account the fair market value of equipment, personnel, and services provided.

#### (d) Available authority

The Secretary may use the Secretary's authority under the Cooperative Forestry Assistance Act of 1978 (16 U.S.C. 2101 et seq.) and other Federal, State, and local governmental authorities in implementing action plans.

#### (e) Consistency with forest plans

The implementation of action plans shall be consistent with land and resource management plans.

(Pub. L. 101–624, title XXIII, §2376, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 4048; Pub. L. 106–113, div. B, §1000(a)(3) [title III, §345(d)], Nov. 29, 1999, 113 Stat. 1535, 1501A–204.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Cooperative Forestry Assistance Act of 1978, referred to in subsec. (d), is Pub. L. 95–313, July 1, 1978, 92 Stat. 365, which is classified principally to chapter 41 (§2101 et seq.) of Title 16, Conservation. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 2101 of Title 16 and Tables.

#### Amendments

1999—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 106–113 substituted "natural resources" for "forest resources" and "National Forest System land resources" for "national forest resources".
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. William Harris, Appellant, v. J. Edwin La Vallee, as Warden of Clinton Prison, Respondent.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Clinton County, denying relator’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus. On October 10, 1956 upon conviction of burglary, third degree and grand larceny, second degree, relator was committed to the Reception Center of the Department of Correction at Elmira. On November 15, 1956 relator was transferred from the Reception Center to the Clinton Prison hospital ostensibly for treatment of tuberculosis. After spending a period of from 3 to 4 months in the prison hospital relator was transferred to Clinton Prison where he remained until he was paroled on September 9, 1958. On January 13, 1960 upon conviction of robbery, first degree, relator was sentenced to a term of from 15 to 20 years at Sing Sing Prison. At that time relator owed 2 years, 2 months, 1 day delinquent time on his first sentence. Relator alleges in his petition that he received no medical treatment for tuberculosis during his confinement in the Clinton Prison hospital, that he could not have been properly classified during his five-week stay at the Reception Center and that therefore his transfer from the Reception Center to Clinton Prison was improper. As relief, he seeks to have his first conviction “ be declared Null and Void and expunged from the record ”. Relator does not, however, challenge the validity of either his first or second conviction. We find no merit in relator’s contentions. It is well settled that “ under ordinary circumstances a mere transfer (as distinguished from a commitment for insanity) is purely an administrative matter, and a prisoner has no standing to choose the place in which he is to be confined ” *(People ex rel. Brown*v. *Johnston,*9 N Y 2d 482, 484; *People ex rel. Sacconanno*v. *Shaw,*4 A D 2d 817). By the explicit language used by the Court of Appeals therein, *People ex rel. Brown*v. *Johnston (supra,*p. 484), did not change this rule as urged by relator but merely created an exception thereto for “ removals, in eases of alleged insane prisoners”. Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. Present— Coon, J. P., Gibson, Herlihy, Reynolds and Taylor, JJ.
### §7656. Designation of Crisis Management Team within Department

#### (a) Designation of Crisis Management Team

The Secretary of Agriculture shall designate a Crisis Management Team within the Department of Agriculture, which shall be—

(1) composed of senior departmental personnel with strong subject matter expertise selected from each relevant agency of the Department; and

(2) headed by a team leader with management and communications skills.

#### (b) Duties of Crisis Management Team

The Crisis Management Team shall be responsible for the following:

(1) Developing a Department-wide crisis management plan, taking into account similar plans developed by other government agencies and other large organizations, and developing written procedures for the implementation of the crisis management plan.

(2) Conducting periodic reviews and revisions of the crisis management plan and procedures developed under paragraph (1).

(3) Ensuring compliance with crisis management procedures by personnel of the Department and ensuring that appropriate Department personnel are familiar with the crisis management plan and procedures and are encouraged to bring information regarding crises or potential crises to the attention of members of the Crisis Management Team.

(4) Coordinating the Department's information gathering and dissemination activities concerning issues managed by the Crisis Management Team.

(5) Ensuring that Department spokespersons convey accurate, timely, and scientifically sound information regarding crises or potential crises that can be easily understood by the general public.

(6) Cooperating with, and coordinating among, other Federal agencies, States, local governments, industry, and public interest groups, Department activities regarding a crisis.

#### (c) Role in prioritizing certain research

The Crisis Management Team shall cooperate with the Advisory Board in the prioritization of agricultural research conducted or funded by the Department regarding animal health, natural disasters, food safety, and other agricultural issues.

#### (d) Cooperative agreements

The Secretary shall seek to enter into cooperative agreements with other Federal departments and agencies that have related programs or activities to help ensure consistent, accurate, and coordinated dissemination of information throughout the executive branch in the event of a crisis, such as, in the case of a threat to human health from food-borne pathogens, developing a rapid and coordinated response among the Department, the Centers for Disease Control, and the Food and Drug Administration.

(Pub. L. 105–185, title VI, §618, June 23, 1998, 112 Stat. 607.)
SI 0-100322-05 I 

INTERNATIONAL AIPPORT 

Eas/ to and through. 

March 11,2010 

The Honorable Raymond H, LaHood 

Secretary 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Doclcet DOT-OST-20I0-WBI 

Dear Mr. Secretary: 

Thank you for the opportunity to express our support for the application for antitrust 

immunity and proposed joint business agreement filed by American Airlines and Japan 

Airlines. The proposed alliance between these two airlines is vital for oneworld to 

compete effectively with the Star and SkyTeam alliance. This increased interalliance 

competition will in turn enhance the benefits of tlie Department's Open Skies policy -

first by solidifying U.S.-Japan Open Skies, then by sei-ving as a foundation for further 

liberalization across Asia. 

After a thorough review, we encourage the Department of Transportation to approve this 

application as it would enable these oneworld alliance airlines to work closely together to 

deliver highly competitive air transportation services. Approval for AA/JAL alliance will 

have a positive impact on air travel by offering customers more service, scheduling and 

pricing options and will help to ensure that customers continue to benefit from having 

tliree competitive air alliances to choose from. 

I urge you to quickly approve this application. 

Sincerely, 

"~J 

lAk — t 

Iftikhar Ahmad 

Director 

Owned and Operated by the City of Dayton 

3600 Terminal Drive - Suite 300 - Vandalia, Ohio 45377-1095 

(937) 454-8200/1-877-FLYDAY1 Telephone * (937) 454-8284 Fax * www.flydayton.com
### §423. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 423 was editorially reclassified as section 2120 of this title.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT JUNE 30, 1997 AND THE RELATED CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND OF CASH FLOWS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1997 OF
THREE-FIVE SYSTEMS, INC. AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.  THIS EXHIBIT SHALL NOT BE DEEMED
FILED FOR PURPOSES OF SECTION 11 OF THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 AND SECTION 18
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, OR OTHERWISE SUBJECT TO THE LIABILITY OF
SUCH SECTIONS, NOR SHALL IT BE DEEMED A PART OF ANY OTHER FILING WHICH
INCORPORATES THIS REPORT BY REFERENCE, UNLESS SUCH OTHER FILING EXPRESSLY
INCORPORATES THIS EXHIBIT BY REFERENCE.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          11,661
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,252
<ALLOWANCES>                                       475
<INVENTORY>                                      7,864
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                34,839
<PP&E>                                          41,282
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,287
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  66,139
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,521
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            79
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    66,139
<SALES>                                         34,866
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                34,866
<CGS>                                           26,865
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   32,255
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    19
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,903
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,074
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,829
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,829
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.23
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 15

TXU Gas Company:

We have made a review, in accordance with standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants, of the unaudited condensed
consolidated interim financial information of TXU Gas Company and subsidiaries
(TXU Gas) for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2002 and 2001, as
indicated in our report dated August 13, 2002; because we did not perform an
audit, we expressed no opinion on that information.

We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included in TXU Gas'
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2002, is
incorporated by reference in Registration Statements No. 333-85769,
333-85769-01, 333-85769-02 and 333-85769-03 on Form S-3.

We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under
the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration
Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or
certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Dallas, Texas
August 13, 2002
#### In re FRANK. In the matter of the application of Samuel J. Frank for admission to the bar.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

November 25, 1903.)

No opinion. Application granted.
Comment Info: =================

General Comment:see attached comment
Order filed, April 24, 2020.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-20-00017-CR

 14-20-00018-CR

 14-20-00019-CR

 14-20-00020-CR

 14-20-00021-CR

BUFORD LLOYD CROWELL, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 182nd District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1614719, 1633371, 1633372, 1633373, 1663374

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due April 17, 2020. See Tex. R. App. 

P. 35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the record. 

The record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record has not 

been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order Roxanne Wiltshire, the court reporter, to file the record in this 

appeal within 15 days of the date of this order. 

PER CURIAM

Panel Consists of Justices Christopher, Wise and Zimmerer.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, February 26, 2019.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, February 26, 2019

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A19I0179. MABLE TURMAN v. THE STATE.

Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of 

this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record 

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

LC NUMBERS:

18CR24954
# 2015 Congressional Action
### §1315. Repealed. Pub. L. 108–357, title VI, §611(o), Oct. 22, 2004, 118 Stat. 1523

Section, acts July 12, 1952, ch. 709, 66 Stat. 597; Mar. 31, 1955, ch. 21, §2, 69 Stat. 24, related to additional Burley tobacco acreage allotments.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal applicable to the 2005 and subsequent crops of tobacco, see section 643 of Pub. L. 108–357, set out as an Effective Date note under section 518 of this title.

#### Savings Provision

Repeal not to affect the liability of any person under this section with respect to the 2004 or an earlier crop of tobacco, see section 614 of Pub. L. 108–357, set out as a note under section 515 of this title.
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF THE STATE OF TEXAS

PD

-___________________

MICHAEL JERMAINE WILLIAMS, §

Appellant § On Petition for Review of

v. § No. 14 -13- 00 527- CR

§ Court of Appeals

§ Fourteenth District of Texas

THE STATE OF TEXAS §

Appellee

PETITIONER/APPELLANT ’S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME

TO FILE PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

Petitioner/Appellant Michael Jermaine Williams moves for an extension of

time to file his petition for discretionary review, under T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 10.5(b).

I. LOWER COURT PROCEEDINGS

Judgment in this case was entered on June 7, 2013

. The court of appeals

affirmed on December 23, 2014. No motion for rehearing was filed.

II. PROCEEDINGS IN THIS COURT

Mr. Williams ’s petition is due on January 22, 2014. No previous extensions

have been requested.

III. REASONS FOR REQUEST

The 30 days since the court of a ppeals’ opinion included the Christmas holiday,

when counsel was vacationing with her family out of state. Further, since counsel’s

return, counsel has missed more than a week of work with the flu. PD-0096-15

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

Transmitted 1/22/2015 3:52:50 PM

Accepted 1/28/2015 10:48:27 AM

ABEL ACOSTA

CLERK2

Also in the last 30 days, c ounsel provided legal research and argument in a

murder trial in Harris County D istrict Court. Finally, c ounsel also has been working to

complete a brief in the case of Reginald Turo n Hill v. State , Cause No. 14

- 14

- 00376

- CR,

which has no further extensions and is past

- due.

III. FILING OF MOTION

In the exercise of due diligence, counsel could not complete Mr. Williams ’s

p etition by the deadline. Th i s motion is not filed for purposes of delay, but so justice

may be done.

PRAYER

Mr. Williams respectfully requests that this motion be granted and that the

Court permit an extension of time until February 2 3 , 2015

, to fil e his petition for

discretionary review

.

Respectfully submitted,

ALEXANDER BUNIN

Chief Public Defender

Harris County Texas

/s/ Cheri Duncan

___________________

___________ CHERI DUNCAN

Assistant Public Defender

Harris County Texas

S tate Bar No. 06210500

1201 Franklin, 13 th Floor3 Houston Texas 77002

(713) 368

- 0016

(713) 368

- 9278 (Fax)

cheri.duncan@pdo.hctx.net

Attorney for Petitioner/ Appellant,

MICHAEL JERMAINE WILLIAMS

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of Appellant’s Motion to Extend Time to File Appellate

Brief was served on the State of Texas by electronic delivery to the A ppellate Division

of the H arris County District Attorney’s Office and the State Prosecuting Attorney

,

on January 22, 2015.

/s/ Cheri Duncan

_________________________ CHERI DUNCAN