alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 7 (Tuesday, January 12, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 2417]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-00361]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of a Bank 
or Bank Holding Company

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (Act) (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank 
holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the 
applications are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 
1817(j)(7)).
    The public portions of the applications listed below, as well as 
other related filings required by the Board, if any, are available for 
immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank(s) indicated below and 
at the offices of the Board of Governors. This information may also be 
obtained on an expedited basis, upon request, by contacting the 
appropriate Federal Reserve Bank and from the Board's Freedom of 
Information Office at https://www.federalreserve.gov/foia/request.htm. 
Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards 
enumerated in paragraph 7 of the Act.
    Comments regarding each of these applications must be received at 
the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors, 
Ann E. Misback, Secretary of the Board, 20th Street and Constitution 
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20551-0001, not later than January 27, 2021.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (Colette A. Fried, Assistant 
Vice President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414:
    1. G. Michael Herger Revocable Trust, G. Michael Herger, as 
trustee, both of Redding, California; Paul M. Herger and Cathy S. 
Beatty, both of Vinton Iowa; to become members of the Herger Family 
Control Group, a group acting in concert, to retain voting shares of 
Keystone Community Bancorporation, and thereby indirectly retain voting 
shares of Keystone Savings Bank, both of Keystone, Iowa.
    2. Mark Curtis Bolen, Montezuma, Iowa; to join the Arendt Family 
Control Group, a group acting in concert, to retain voting shares of 
Arendt's Inc., and thereby indirectly retain voting shares of Peoples 
Savings Bank, both of Montezuma, Iowa.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, January 6, 
2021.
Michele Taylor Fennell,
Deputy Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2021-00361 Filed 1-11-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
#### Blasius Industries, Inc., Appellant, v North American Watch Corp., Respondent.

-Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, entered September 30, 1977, fixing 1975 as the base date for the calculation of additional rent, unanimously modified, on the law, with $75 costs and disbursements of this appeal to plaintiff, to the extent of declaring 1969 as the base date and awarding judgment to plaintiff accordingly, and, except, as thus modified, affirmed. The sublease was specifically made subject to all the terms and conditions of the primary base, which was also incorporated by reference in the sublease. Its clear intention was to place the sublessee (defendant) in the shoes of the sublessor (plaintiff), by providing that the former assume the obligations of the latter to the landlord from the date the sublessee took occupancy. The base year in the primary lease for determining additional rent is 1969. The provisions of paragraphs 2, 6 and 10 of the sublease, upon which Special Term relied for its determination, merely limit defendant’s obligation to pay "additional rent” on a pro rata basis for space occupied during the period of occupancy after November 1, 1975, the date defendant took possession. In no way do these provisions establish a base year different from that contained in the prime lease. Finally, there is no provision in the sublease for attorneys’ fees. The provision in the primary lease allowing counsel fees is limited to the landlord’s right against the lessee. Settle order. Concur-Kupferman, J. P., Lupiano, Lane, Sandier and Sullivan, JJ.
§ 552.165 Responsibilities. ( a ) Commander, Yakima Training Center: ( 1 ) Schedule the Yakima Training Center range complex per FL Reg 350-31 and FL PS 350-2.
( 2 ) Process requests for non-military, non-commercial use per § 552.166.
( b ) Commander, Vancouver Barracks: ( 1 ) Schedule the Camp Bonneville range complex per FL Reg 350-32 and FL PS 350-2.
( 2 ) Process requests for non-military, non-commercial use per Paragraph 6c.
( c ) Fort Lewis DPTM. ( 1 ) Schedule the Fort Lewis range complex per FL Reg 350-30 and FL PS 350-2, including allocation of and for recreational use.
( 2 ) Operate the Fort Lewis Area Access Section.
( 3 ) Respond to DEH coordination on timber sales and other commercial use of the range complex.
( d ) Law Enforcement Agency (LEC). Provide law enforcement and game warden patrols on the range complexes.
( e ) Director of Engineering and Housing (DEH). ( 1 ) Coordinate with DPTM and the appropriate Sub-Installation Commander on Real Estate Agreements, timber sales, wildlife management, construction, forest management, Installation Training Area Management (ITAM), and other DEH or Corps of Engineers managed actions occurring on the range complex
( 2 ) Ensure that Real Estate Agreement holders are required to notify Fort Lewis Area Access, YTC DPCA, or Camp Bonneville Range Control, as appropriate, of range complex entry.
( f ) DPCA. With DEH, manage Installation hunting, fishing, and trapping programs. Manage picnic and recreation sites located in the Fort Lewis range complex, as listed in appendix A to this part. Advise DPTM on private organizations requesting use of the Fort Lewis range complex for fundraisers.
( g ) Public Affairs Office (PAO). ( 1 ) Act as interface to resolve community relations issues related to land use.
( 2 ) Coordinate equipment and special assistance requests per § 552.165, and advise DPTM or the appropriate Sub-Installation Commander if permit requirements have been waived by the Command Group for a particular event or activity.
( 3 ) Inform DPTM or the appropriate Sub-Installation Commander of public response to policy execution.
# FY 2022 Congressional Table

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION FISCAL YEAR 2017 OMB REQUEST&11(in thousands of dollars)	August 17, 2015, 10:16 AM

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION FISCAL YEAR 2017 OMB REQUEST&11(in thousands of dollars)	July 16, 2015 10:56 am

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION FISCAL YEAR 2017 OMB REQUEST&11(in thousands of dollars)	August 7, 2015, 6:40 AM

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION FISCAL YEAR 2017 OMB REQUEST&11(in thousands of dollars)	September 3, 2015, 3:56 PM

&"-,Regular"DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION'S FY 2022 CONGRESSIONAL ACTION&10(in thousands of dollars)	

&20 	&P

&20 	&P

&20 	&P

&20 	&P

&P
Order filed, June 25, 2014

.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14

- 14

- 00464

- CR

____________

JOEL NAVARRO , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the Co unty Crim inal C our t at Law No 15

Harris County, Texas

Trial C ourt Cause No. 1836127



### ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due December 23, 2013

. See Tex. R.

App. P. 35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the

record. The record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record

has not been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order Connie Cole , the official court reporter, to file the record in this

appeal within 30 days of the date of this order

.

PER CURIAM
Editorial Note on Part 842
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 842 appear at 81 FR 83688, Nov. 22, 2016.

§ 842.20 Statute of limitations. ( a ) The claimant must file the claim in writing within 2 years after it accrues. It accrues when the claimant discovered or reasonably should have discovered the full extent of the property damage or loss. For transportation losses, the claim usually accrues on the date of delivery.
( b ) To compute the statutory period, the incident date is excluded and the day the claim was filed is included.
( c ) Consider a claim filed after the statute has run if both of the following are present: ( 1 ) The United States is at war or in an armed conflict when the claim accrues, or the United States enters a war or armed conflict after the claim accrues. Congress or the President establishes the beginning and end of war or armed conflict. A claimant may not file a claim more than 2 years after the war or armed conflict ends.
( 2 ) Good cause is shown. A claimant may not file a claim more than 2 years after the good cause ceases to exist.
[55 FR 2809, Jan. 29, 1990. Redesignated at 81 FR 83688, Nov. 22, 2016]
No. 8106.

#### Shrader, Admr., *v.*Downer, Exr., et al.

(Decided October 20, 1903.)

Error to Circuit Court of Licking county.

*Messrs. G. & G. H. Follett,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. Samuel M. Hunter*and *Mr. Jolm M. Swartz,*for •defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Burket, C. J., Davis and Price, JJ., concur.
August 27, 2013



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

ADRIAN SIFUENTES , Appellant

NO. 14

- 12

- 00471

- CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

________________________________ This cause was heard on the record of court below demonstrating appellant no longer desires to pursue his appeal. Having considered the record the Court orders the appeal DISMISSED

. We further order appellant pay all cos ts expended in the appeal. We further order the mandate be issued immediately.
We further order this decision certified below for observance.
1204.1301 Policy. ( a ) DOT follows National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Federal Information Processing Standards (FIPS) Publication (PUB) Number 201-2, Personal Identity Verification (PIV) of Federal Employees and Contractors, and OMB implementation guidance for personal identity verification, for all affected contractor and subcontractor personnel when contract performance requires contractors to have routine physical access to a federally-controlled facility and/or routine physical and logical access to a federally-controlled information system.
( c ) OAs must designate an official responsible for verifying contractor employees' personal identity.
#### In the Matter of John J. Sullivan, Petitioner, v. John A. Wallace, as Director of Probation, Office of Probation for the Courts of New York City, et al., Respondents.

Determination unanimously annulled on the law and on the facts insofar as it relates to Specification No. 1, and the proceeding remanded for further consideration and determination, and the determination otherwise confirmed, without costs. A charge of misconduct and ineompeteney consisting of two specifications were served upon petitioner May 10, 1963. Specification No. 2 charging that petitioner had failed to appear January 30, 1963 for an examination, as ordered, is supported by the evidence, and the finding thereon will not be disturbed. Specification No. 1 alleges “That continuously and uninterruptedly from the third day of September 1958 to date you have not performed the duties incumbent upon a Probation Officer for the City of New York by reason of mental incapacity.” While that specification lacks definiteness and specificity, the objection thereto is more fundamental. Petitioner is charged with failure to perform when he was not afforded an opportunity to perform. In the early part of the period embraced in the specification petitioner was assigned to limited duties of handling the calendar in *669Part III of the then Court of Special Sessions. Subsequently he was assigned as a receptionist-clerk to one of the Manhattan offices of the court. The record suggests a possible inability to perform but does not contain substantial evidence in support of a charge of failure to do so. In light of the sensitive nature and character of the duties of a probation officer and because of certain questions raised by a reading of the record and our determination as to Specification No. 1, we conclude the matter should be remanded. Respondent is thereby afforded the opportunity of formulating the specification more precisely should it desire to do so, and of giving further consideration to what discipline or penalty is to be imposed. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, Valente, McNally and Stevens, JJ.
### §1990. Transfer of lands to Secretary

The President may at any time in his discretion transfer to the Secretary any right, interest, or title held by the United States in any lands acquired in the program of national defense and no longer needed therefor, which the President shall find suitable for the purposes of this chapter, and the Secretary shall dispose of such lands in the manner and subject to the terms and conditions of the chapter.

(Pub. L. 87–128, title III, §340, Aug. 8, 1961, 75 Stat. 318.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this title", meaning title III of Pub. L. 87–128, Aug. 8, 1961, 75 Stat. 307, known as the Consolidated Farm and Rural Development Act, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of title III to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1921 of this title and Tables.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Delegation of Functions

Authority of President under this section in his discretion to transfer to Secretary of Agriculture any right, interest or title held by United States in any lands acquired in program of national defense and no longer needed for that program, and to determine suitability of lands to be transferred, for purposes referred to in this section, delegated to Administrator of General Services, provided, that exercise by Administrator of authority delegated to him herein shall require concurrence of Secretary of Defense as to absence of further need of lands for national defense program, see section 1(15) of Ex. Ord. No. 11609, July 22, 1971, 36 F.R. 13747, set out as a note under section 301 of Title 3, The President.
STATE OF LOUISl~NA

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

ENAAS NIKROO MORRISON, 

INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HER

CAPACITY AS PROVISIONAL

ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE

SUCCESSION OF DORIAN MAXWELL

MORRISON

VERSUS

BRITTANY VARNADO ADAMS, 

TRUSTEE OF THE C&C MORRISON

TRUST A FOR THE BENEFIT OF

DORIAN M. MORRISON AND AS

TRUSTEE OF TRUST B FOR THE

BENEFIT OF JOSEPHINE

RHIANNON MORRISON

NO. 2023 CW 0066

MARCH 13, 2023

In Re: Brittany Varnado Adams, Truste~ of the C & C Morrison

Trust A for the benefit of Dorian M. Morrison and as

Trustee of Trust B for the Benefit of Josephine

Rhiannon Morrison, applying for supervisory writs, 

19th Judicial District Court, Parish of East Baton

Rouge, No. 723945. 

BEFORE: THERIOT, CHUTZ, AND HESTER, JJ. 

I

WRIT GRANTED. The portion of the trial court's December

6, 2022 judgment denying the peremptory Jxception of no cause of

action filed by the defendant, Brittfny Varnado Adams, as

Trustee of the C & C Morrison Trust A for the benefit of Dorian

M. Morrison and Trust B for the benefit;: of Josephine Rhiannon

Morrison, is reversed. We find the plaintiff, Enaas Nikroo

Morrison, fails to state a cause of actiion for reimbursement of

money taken from the proceeds of the sale of immovable property

to satisfy a mortgage securing payment o~ a promissory note that

was executed prior to the plaintiff acEepting an inter vivos

donation of the subject immovable property. See La. Civ. Code

art. 1549. Accordingly, the exception of no cause of action is

granted, and the claims of Enaas Nik.roo Morrison against

Brittany Varnado Adams, as Trustee of the, C & C Morrison Trust A

for the benefit of Dorian M. Morrison and Trust B for the

benefit of Josephine Rhiannon Morrison, are dismissed with

prejudice. 

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

DEPUTY CLERK OF COURT

FOR THE COURT

MRT

WRC

CHH
**EXHIBIT
      32(A)**




**Section
      1350 Certification**


**By
      Principal Executive Officer**






I,
      Daniel
      Greenberg, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the periodic report,
      to which this Statement is attached, fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, and the
      information contained in the periodic report to which this Statement is
      attached, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and
      results of operations of the registrant.





A
      signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company
      and
      will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC upon request.




Dated:
              April
              8, 2008By:
            /s/
                Daniel GreenbergDaniel
                GreenbergChief
                Executive Officer
### §4531. Definitions

For purposes of this subchapter—

(1) the term "board" means the board of trustees of the Institute;

(2) the term "Department" means the Department of Agriculture;

(3) the term "dairy products" means manufactured products that are derived from the processing of milk, and includes fluid milk products;

(4) the term "fluid milk products" means those milk products normally consumed in liquid form as a beverage;

(5) the term "Fund" means the Dairy Research Trust Fund established by section 4536 of this title;

(6) the term "Institute" means the National Dairy Research Endowment Institute established by section 4532 of this title;

(7) the term "milk" means any class of cow's milk marketed in the United States;

(8) the term "person" means any individual, group of individuals, partnership, corporation, association, cooperative, or any other entity;

(9) the term "producer" means any person engaged in the production of milk for commercial use;

(10) the term "research" means studies testing the effectiveness of market development and promotion efforts, studies relating to the nutritional value of milk and dairy products, and other related efforts to expand demand for milk and dairy products;

(11) the term "Secretary" means the Secretary of Agriculture unless the context specifies otherwise; and

(12) the term "United States", when used in a geographical sense, means all of the States, the District of Columbia, and the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico.

(Pub. L. 98–180, title I, §130, as added Pub. L. 99–198, title I, §121, Dec. 23, 1985, 99 Stat. 1367; amended Pub. L. 110–234, title I, §1507(c), May 22, 2008, 122 Stat. 997; Pub. L. 110–246, §4(a), title I, §1507(c), June 18, 2008, 122 Stat. 1664, 1725.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Pub. L. 110–234 and Pub. L. 110–246 made identical amendments to this section. The amendments by Pub. L. 110–234 were repealed by section 4(a) of Pub. L. 110–246.

#### Amendments

2008—Par. (12). Pub. L. 110–246, §1507(c), added par. (12) and struck out former par. (12) which read as follows: "the term 'United States' means the several States and the territories and possessions of the United States, except that for purposes of sections 4532, 4534(a), and 4537 of this title, and paragraph (7) of this section, such term means the forty-eight contiguous States in the continental United States."

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2008 Amendment

Amendment of this section and repeal of Pub. L. 110–234 by Pub. L. 110–246 effective May 22, 2008, the date of enactment of Pub. L. 110–234, see section 4 of Pub. L. 110–246, set out as an Effective Date note under section 8701 of this title.
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 596 

To direct the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration to prescribe regulations establishing minimum standards for space for passengers on passenger aircraft, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 9, 2017 

Mr. BLUMENTHAL (for himself, Mr. SCHUMER, Mr. MARKEY, Mr. MENENDEZ, 

and Mrs. FEINSTEIN) introduced the following bill; which was read twice 

and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To direct the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration to prescribe regulations establishing minimum 

standards for space for passengers on passenger aircraft, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Seat Egress in Air 

5 Travel Act of 2017’’ or the ‘‘SEAT Act of 2017’’. 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 596 IS

1 SEC. 2. REGULATIONS RELATING TO SPACE FOR PAS2 SENGERS ON AIRCRAFT. 

3 (a) AIR CARRIER DEFINED.—In this section, the 

4 term ‘‘air carrier’’ means an air carrier (as defined in sec5 tion 40102 of title 49, United States Code) that trans6 ports passengers by aircraft as a common carrier for com7 pensation. 

8 (b) REGULATIONS RELATING TO SPACE FOR PAS9 SENGERS ON AIRCRAFT.—Not later than 180 days after 

10 the date of the enactment of this Act, the Administrator 

11 shall prescribe regulations— 

12 (1) establishing minimum standards for space 

13 for passengers on passenger aircraft, including the 

14 size, width, and pitch of seats, the amount of leg 

15 room, and the width of aisles on such aircraft for 

16 the safety and health of passengers; and 

17 (2) requiring each air carrier to prominently 

18 display on the website of the air carrier the amount 

19 of space available for each passenger on passenger 

20 aircraft operated by the air carrier, including the 

21 size, width, and pitch of seats, the amount of leg 

22 room, and the width of aisles on such aircraft. 

23 (c) CONSULTATIONS.—In prescribing the regulations 

24 required under subsection (b), the Administrator shall 

25 consult with the Occupational Safety and Health Adminis26 tration, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 596 IS

1 passenger advocacy organizations, physicians, and ergo2 nomic engineers. 

Æ 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

WOLFGANG NEBMAIER, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

 v. 

JOSEPHINE COUNTY, a political entity in 

the State of Oregon along with all related 

regulatory entities, past or present, engaged 

in the violation of 7:301, the Morrill Act of 

July 2nd, 1862. (in the following “Josephine 

County”), 

Defendant-Appellee.

No. 18-35743 

D.C. No. 1:18-cv-01258-MC 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Oregon

Michael J. McShane, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 19, 2018**

Before: FERNANDEZ, SILVERMAN, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges. 

Wolfgang Nebmaier appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment 

dismissing his action alleging claims under the Morrill Act of 1862, 7 U.S.C. 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

FEB 25 2019

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 18-35743 

§ 301. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. 

Wilhelm v. Rotman, 680 F.3d 1113, 1118 (9th Cir. 2012) (dismissal under 28 

U.S.C. § 1915A); Barren v. Harrington, 152 F.3d 1193, 1194 (9th Cir. 1998) 

(order) (dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii)). We affirm. 

The district court properly dismissed Nebmaier’s action because the Morrill 

Act of 1862 does not provide a private right of action. See UFCW Local 1500 

Pension Fund v. Mayer, 895 F.3d 695, 698-99 (9th Cir. 2018) (setting forth 

circumstances under which the court may interpret a private right of action, and 

explaining that a private right of action requires evidence of a congressional intent 

to create a private right and a private remedy). 

Nebmaier’s request to strike defendant’s answering brief, set forth in his 

reply brief, is denied. 

Defendant’s pending motion (Docket Entry No. 15) is denied. 

AFFIRMED.