alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michael Broker

NE3RD LLC November 2, 2015

P.O. Box 6135 

Navarre, FL 32566

Cell (832) 819-3009

Email: nerd@ne3rd.com

Exemption No. 12417

Regulatory Docket No. FAA–2015–2203

U.S. Department of Transportation

Docket Management System

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE

Washington, DC 20590

RE: Petition for Relief from Conditions and Limitations #26

We would like to petition for relief from Conditions and Limitations #26. Specifically the requirement 

to remain 500 feet from non-participating structures or vehicles which will present a severe hardship as 

related to a potential project we are reviewing which has a strong public interest component. This 

project entails the inspection of canals in South Florida to identify vegetation and debris build-up which 

are the leading cause of flooding in adjacent areas. These inspections are critically important during 

anticipated times of extreme rainfall which can easily overwhelm the flood drainage capacity of the 

canals when debris are present. The importance of being able to quickly fly will allow the prioritization 

of clearing to occur and reduce the risk of potential flooding. Due to the urban nature of South Florida 

the density of vehicles and structures within most typical 500’ buffers, will make the ability to identify 

and notify owners a very time consuming, difficult (if not impossible) and expensive task to perform 

prior to operations. We would like to request to have the participation buffer reduced to 100’.

We anticipate this same issue may arise in other potential projects and desire this relief to lessen the 

notification burden which will make the exemption usable for these types of critical projects in 

urbanized areas. Please note that strict safety procedures will be used including geofences and other 

mitigations to prevent the vehicle from travelling outside of our project areas. In this instance the 

canals are surrounded by a ROW with restricted access from non-participating people. The vehicle we 

propose to fly is a micro sUAV (4lb multi-rotor) which is flown at very low speeds, usually around 3 

meters per second (or less than 7 miles per hour). The vehicle will be flown under 200’ per the blanket 

COA we were issued.

Thank you for your time in reviewing our petition for relief from the hardship that the existing 500’

buffer creates for our business.

Sincerely,

Michael Broker
M. P. No. 74-270.

#### Apex Incorporated *v.*Rhode Island Workers’ Association *et al.*

*Levy, Goodman, Semonoff & Gorin, Edward F. Burke,*
      *904for plaintiff-respondent. *Donald R. Coblentz, Kenneth F. MacIver, Jr., Rhode Island Legal Services, Inc.,*for defendants-petitioners.

*903Petition for alternate writ of certiorari or mandamus is denied as moot.

Joslin, J. did not participate.
Fiscal Year 2019 Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies - UTAH

No data No data No data

LEA ID District FY 2019 Title I Allocation

4900030 Alpine School District 8,926,760

4900060 Beaver School District 167,289

4900090 Box Elder School District 1,108,973

4900120 Cache School District 1,586,812

4900142 Canyons School District 3,628,798

4900150 Carbon School District 736,354

4900180 Daggett School District 21,987

4900210 Davis School District 6,447,896

4900240 Duchesne School District 814,719

4900270 Emery School District 401,052

4900300 Garfield School District 122,223

4900330 Grand School District 299,697

4900360 Granite School District 15,427,695

4900390 Iron School District 2,275,787

4900420 Jordan School District 4,132,855

4900450 Juab School District 361,337

4900480 Kane School District 197,844

4900510 Logan School District 1,700,214

4900540 Millard School District 517,010

4900570 Morgan School District 75,096

4900600 Murray School District 721,849

4900630 Nebo School District 3,073,913

4900660 North Sanpete School District 504,284

4900690 North Summit School District 84,992

4900720 Ogden School District 4,364,791

4900750 Park City School District 261,928

4900780 Piute School District 82,454

4900810 Provo School District 2,960,501

4900840 Rich School District 63,092

4900870 Salt Lake City School District 6,070,661

4900900 San Juan School District 1,303,646

4900930 Sevier School District 716,889

4900960 South Sanpete School District 440,875

4900990 South Summit School District 40,895

4901020 Tintic School District 30,551

4901050 Tooele School District 1,297,357

4901080 Uintah School District 1,295,041

4901110 Wasatch School District 471,278

4901140 Washington School District 5,419,811

4901170 Wayne School District 127,089

4901200 Weber School District 3,336,530

4999999 PART D SUBPART 2 0

No data No data No data

* Actual amounts received by LEAs will be smaller than shown here due to State-level adjustments to Federal Title I allocations. States adjust

 allocations, for example, to reflect LEA boundary changes or the creation of new LEAs, including charter school LEAs, that are not accounted

 for in the statutory calculations. States also are permitted to reserve, for administration, up to 1 percent of the allocations they would receive

 if $14 billion were appropriated and generally must reserve 7 percent of their allocations for school improvement. These 

 adjustments will reduce the actual amounts available.

X0AT
§ 634.48 General. This subpart provides the standards and procedures for law enforcement personnel when towing, inventorying, searching, impounding, and disposing of POVs. This policy is based on: ( a ) The interests of the Services and DLA in crime prevention, traffic safety, and the orderly flow of vehicle traffic movement.
( b ) The vehicle owner's constitutional rights to due process, freedom from unreasonable search and seizure, and freedom from deprivation of private property.
Editorial Note on Part 842
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 842 appear at 81 FR 83688, Nov. 22, 2016.

§ 842.13 Limiting provisions. ( a ) A complaint must be submitted within 90 days of the date of the incident. The appointing commander may find good cause for the delay and accept a late claim. The appointing commander's determination of good cause is final and not reviewable.
( b ) Assessment of damages in excess of $5,000 against an offender's pay for a single incident requires AFLOA/JACC approval.
[81 FR 83688, Nov. 22, 2016]
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Esterline Technologies Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended February 1, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-Q), I,
Robert D. George, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)    The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)    The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





|                      |  |     |  |                                                                 
|--------------------- |  | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated:  March 6, 2008 |  | By: |  | /s/ Robert D. George                                            
|                      |  |     |  | Robert D. George                                                
|                      |  |     |  | Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer
### §148b. Repealed. Oct. 10, 1940, ch. 851, §4, 54 Stat. 1111

Section, act Apr. 6, 1937, ch. 69, §3, as added May 9, 1938, ch. 192, 52 Stat. 344, related to procurement of materials and equipment for the control of insect pests and plant diseases.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>    5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated financial statements for the 20 weeks ended August 15, 1998, and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             APR-03-1999
<PERIOD-END>                  AUG-15-1998
<CASH>                                  0
<SECURITIES>                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                           0
<ALLOWANCES>                            0
<INVENTORY>                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        0
<PP&E>                                  0
<DEPRECIATION>                          0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   0
<BONDS>                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                             0
<COMMON>                                0
<OTHER-SE>                              0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            0
<SALES>                           868,962
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                  868,962
<CGS>                             610,930
<TOTAL-COSTS>                     610,930
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                  288,681
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 36,509
<INCOME-PRETAX>                   (67,158)
<INCOME-TAX>                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>               (67,158)
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                   259,045
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                      191,887
<EPS-BASIC>                           0
<EPS-DILUTED>                           0


</TABLE>
** 
Exhibit 23.1

 

 

 

 

 

Consent of Independent Auditors

 

 

The Board of Directors and Shareholders

UQM Technologies, Inc.

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registrationstatements on Forms S-8 (Nos. 33-23113, 33-24071, 33-34612, 33-35055, 33-34613, 33-41325,33-64852, 33-47454, 33-81430, 33-92288, and 33-101371) and in the registration statementson Forms S-3 (Nos. 33-6116, 33-63399, 333-01919, 333-13883, 333-44597, 333-23843,33-50393, 333-52861, 333-67313, 333-78525, and 333-75520) of UQM Technologies, Inc. of ourreport dated May 19, 2004 relating to the consolidated balance sheets of UQM Technologies,Inc. and subsidiaries as of March 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related consolidatedstatements of operations, stockholders’ equity and comprehensive loss, and cash flowsfor each of the years in the three-year period ended March 31, 2004, which report appearsin the March 31, 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K of UQM Technologies, Inc.

 

** 
KPMG LLP.

 

 

 

Denver, Colorado****
#### Helen S. Sutton *v.*Joseph P. Leone et al.

*Edward S. Ludorf,*for the appellants (defendants).

*Richard J. Seserman,*for the appellee (plaintiff).

Argued November 5

decided November *5,*1974

The defendants’ motion for judgment pursuant to § 696 of the Practice Book, as amended, in the appeal from the Court of Common Pleas in Hartford County is granted.
**UN PUBLISHED**  UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 16**  **- 6511** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

– Appellee ,
v. ROBERT MOSES WILKERSON , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh
. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. ( 5:96

- cr - 00167

- H

- 1 )

Submitted : June 23, 2016 Decided: June 29, 2016

Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
. Robert Moses Wilkerson, Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer P. May

- Parker, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this c ircuit.2 PER CURIAM: Robert Moses Wilkerson appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for sentence reduction based on Amendment 782 to the Sentencing Guidelines, as well as its order denying Wilkerson’s motion fo r reconsideration
. We have reviewed the record and agree with the district court that Amendment 782 did not alter Wilkerson’s Guidelines range on his narcotics conviction
. Thus, we affirm the district court’s order denying § 3582(c)(2) relief. See Unite d States v. Wilkerson , No. 5:96

- cr - 00167

- H

- 1 (E.D.N.C. Jan. 14, 2016). In addition, the district court lacked authority to reconsider its order denying Wilkerson’s § 3582(c)(2) motion.
See United States v. Goodwyn , 596 F. 3d 233, 235

- 36 (4th Cir. 2010). Accordingly, we also affirm the district court’s order denying Wilkerson’s motion for reconsideration. See United
States v. Wilkerson , No. 5:96

- cr - 00167

- H

- 1 (E.D.N.C. Mar. 30, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid in the decisional
process.

AFFIRMED
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 139 

Celebrating the 75th anniversary of the National Association for Stock Car 

Auto Racing (‘‘NASCAR’’). 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 17, 2023 

Mr. POSEY (for himself, Mr. THOMPSON of California, Mr. BILIRAKIS, Mr. 

CRAWFORD, Mr. KELLY of Pennsylvania, Mr. MCHENRY, Mr. HUDSON, 

Mr. CARTER of Georgia, Mr. HUIZENGA, Mr. WALTZ, Ms. WASSERMAN

SCHULTZ, Mr. JACKSON of North Carolina, Mr. WALBERG, Mr. MOONEY, 

and Mrs. TORRES of California) submitted the following resolution; which 

was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Accountability 

RESOLUTION 

Celebrating the 75th anniversary of the National Association 

for Stock Car Auto Racing (‘‘NASCAR’’). 

Whereas the National Association for Stock Car Auto Racing 

(‘‘NASCAR’’) is the sanctioning body for the premier 

form of motorsports in the United States; 

Whereas NASCAR was incorporated in Daytona Beach, Florida, on February 21, 1948; 

Whereas NASCAR was formed to organize and promote stock 

car racing in the United States; 

Whereas NASCAR has become the premier motorsports innovator, universally regarded as one of the world’s most 

successful sports entertainment properties; 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HRES 139 IH 

Whereas the NASCAR Cup Series features one of the longest 

seasons in sports, which extends across 10 months of the 

year, with large on-site audiences averaging over 100,000 

spectators per weekend; 

Whereas NASCAR has expanded throughout its history to 

become a global sport with series that race in more than 

30 States, as well as Canada, Mexico, Europe, and 

Brazil; 

Whereas, today, NASCAR sanctions more than 1,200 races 

annually and its races are broadcast in nearly every country around the world; 

Whereas NASCAR strives to ensure that each of its race 

events are economically successful, relevant, entertaining, 

and safe; 

Whereas NASCAR continually seeks to engage the core fan 

while igniting lifetime relationships with future fans; 

Whereas NASCAR champions and rewards a winning, innovative culture through sport, which has inspired generations of Americans; 

Whereas the NASCAR Foundation has had a positive impact 

on nearly 1.7 million children and donated more than 

$43 million to children in need; 

Whereas February 21, 2023, marks the 75th anniversary of 

NASCAR; and 

Whereas NASCAR’s 75th anniversary season will be a yearlong celebration of the sport’s past, present, and future: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HRES 139 IH 

1 (1) celebrates the 75th anniversary of the Na2 tional Association for Stock Car Auto Racing 

3 (‘‘NASCAR’’); and 

4 (2) commemorates NASCAR’s contributions to 

5 the United States economy and society throughout 

6 its history. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
**EXHIBIT
12.2**
 **CERTIFICATION**
  I, David
Wolfin, President of Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd., certify
that:
  
 1.  I have
reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd.;
 
 2.
    Based
      on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
      material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
      statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
      were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
      report;
 
 3.
    Based
      on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
      included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
      financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company
      as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
 
 4.
    The
      Company's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
      establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
      defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and
      have:
 
 (a)
    Designed
      such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
      controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
      that material information relating to the Company, including its
      consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
      prepared;
 
 (b)
    Omitted;
 
 (c)
    Evaluated
      the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures and
      presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
      disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by
      this report based on such evaluation; and
 
 (d)
    Disclosed
      in this report any change in the Company's internal control over financial
      reporting that occurred during the Company's most recent annual report
      that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
      affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting; and
 
 5.
    The
      Company's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our
      most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
      the Company's auditors and the audit committee of the Company's board of
      directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 
 (a)
    All
      significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
      operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
      reasonably likely to adversely affect the Company's ability to record,
      process, summarize and report financial information; and
 
 (b)
    Any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the Company's internal control
      over financial reporting.
 
 Dated:
July 21 ,
2005     _ */s/
David Wolfin* ____________
 David Wolfin, President
 (Principal Financial Officer)
 
  66
#### BRASHER, Respondent, v. BROOKLYN HEIGHTS R. CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

January 16, 1903.)

Action by Katherine M. L. Brasher against the Brooklyn Heights Railroad Company.

No opinion. Judgment and order reversed, and new trial granted, costs to abide the event, unless within 20 days plaintiff stipulates to reduce recovery of damages to the sum of $5,000 and extra allowance pro=portionately, in which case the judgment as modified is unanimously affirmed, without costs.
### §6414. Suspension or termination of orders

#### (a) Suspension or termination by Secretary

The Secretary shall, whenever the Secretary finds that the order or any provision of the order obstructs or does not tend to effectuate the declared policy of this chapter, terminate or suspend the operation of the order or provision.

#### (b) Other referenda

#### (1) In general

The Secretary may conduct at any time a referendum of persons who, during a representative period as determined by the Secretary, have been fluid milk processors on whether to suspend or terminate the order, and shall hold such a referendum on request of the Board or any group of such processors that among them marketed during a representative period, as determined by the Secretary, 10 percent or more of the volume of fluid milk products marketed by fluid milk processors voting in the preceding referendum.

#### (2) Suspension or termination

If the Secretary determines that the suspension or termination is favored—

(A) by at least 50 percent of fluid milk processors voting in the referendum; and

(B) by fluid milk processors voting in the referendum that marketed during a representative period, as determined by the Secretary, 40 percent or more of the volume of fluid milk products marketed by fluid milk processors voting in the referendum;

the Secretary shall, within 6 months after making the determination, suspend or terminate, as appropriate, collection of assessments under the order, and suspend or terminate, as appropriate, activities under the order in an orderly manner as soon as practicable.

#### (3) Costs; manner

Subsections (c) and (d) of section 6413 of this title shall apply to a referendum conducted under this subsection.

(Pub. L. 101–624, title XIX, §1999O, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 3925; Pub. L. 104–127, title I, §146(d)(2), (e), Apr. 4, 1996, 110 Stat. 919; Pub. L. 107–171, title I, §1506(c), May 13, 2002, 116 Stat. 210.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2002—Pub. L. 107–171 redesignated subsecs. (b) and (c) as (a) and (b), respectively, and struck out heading and text of former subsec. (a). Text read as follows: "Any order effective under this chapter shall be terminated December 31, 2002. The Secretary shall—

"(1) terminate the collection of assessments under the order upon such date; and

"(2) terminate activities under the order in an orderly manner as soon as practicable after such date."

1996—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 104–127, §146(e), substituted "2002" for "1996" in introductory provisions.

Subsec. (c)(1). Pub. L. 104–127, §146(d)(2)(A), substituted "fluid milk processors voting in the preceding referendum" for "all processors".

Subsec. (c)(2)(B). Pub. L. 104–127, §146(d)(2)(B), substituted "fluid milk processors voting in the referendum;" for "all processors;".
### §224. Attorney General to institute court proceedings for enforcement

The Secretary may report any violation of this chapter to the Attorney General of the United States, who shall cause appropriate proceedings to be commenced and prosecuted in the proper courts of the United States without delay.

(Aug. 15, 1921, ch. 64, title IV, §404, 42 Stat. 168; Aug. 15, 1921, ch. 64, title V, §503, as added Aug. 14, 1935, ch. 532, 49 Stat. 649.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1935—Act Aug. 15, 1921, title V, §503, as added Aug. 14, 1935, purported to insert "or any live poultry dealer or handler" after "packer" but word "packer" does not appear in this section.
Chapter 3
No. 724.

#### Carl Goepel et al., Partners, etc. *v.*A. Mitchell Palmer, as Alien Property Custodian.

March 22, 1920.

*Mr. Ruby R. Tale*for petitioners.

*Mr. Assistant Attorney General Spellacy*for respondent.

Petition for a writ of certiorari to the Court of Chancery of the State of New Jersey denied.