alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §3382. Involuntary separation for retirement

An air traffic controller who is eligible for immediate retirement under section 8336 of this title may be separated involuntarily from the service if the Secretary determines that the separation of the controller is necessary in the interest of—

(1) aviation safety;

(2) the efficient control of air traffic; or

(3) the preservation of the physical or mental health of the controller.

Chapter 75 of this title does not apply to a determination or action under this section. Separation under this section shall not become final, without the consent of the controller, until the last day of the second month following the day the controller receives a notification of the determination by the Secretary under this section, or, if a review is requested under section 3383 of this title, the last day of the month in which a final decision is issued by a board of review under section 3383(c) of this title, whichever is later. A controller who is to be separated under this section is entitled to training under section 3381 of this title. Separation of such a controller who elects to receive training under section 3381 shall not become final until the last day of the month following the completion of his training.

(Added Pub. L. 92–297, §3(a), May 16, 1972, 86 Stat. 142; amended Pub. L. 96–347, §1(b), Sept. 12, 1980, 94 Stat. 1150.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

For definition of Secretary, referred to in text, see section 2109 of this title.

#### Amendments

1980—Pub. L. 96–347 in provisions preceding par. (1) substituted "Secretary determines" for "Secretary of Transportation determines".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1980 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 96–347 effective on 90th day after Sept. 12, 1980, see section 3 of Pub. L. 96–347, set out as a note under section 2109 of this title.

#### Effective Date

Section effective on 90th day after May 16, 1972, see section 10 of Pub. L. 92–297, set out as a note under section 3381 of this title.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Joseph Kurash, Appellant.

Judgment of conviction unanimously affirmed. No opinion. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel,-Rabin, McNally and Eager, JJ.
Note to the Docket:

P roposed Registration of Insecticide Aldicarb on Peanuts, Cotton, Sugar Beets, Dry Beans, Soybeans and Sweet Potatoes. There are no new risk assessments to support this registration. All previous risk assessments for this chemical can be located on our website at http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/reregistration/aldicarb/

.
EPA Registration Jacket 84229-7 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47

*Product ingredient source information may be entitled to confidential treatment*
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
______________________________________________________________ 

Page 62 is not included in this copy. 

Pages through are not included in this copy. 

_______________________________________________________________ 

The material not included contains the following type of 

information: 

_____ Identity of product inert ingredients. 

_____ Identity of product impurities. 

_____ Description of the product manufacturing process. 

_____ Description of quality control procedures. 

_____ Identity of the source of product ingredients. 

_____ Sales or other commercial/financial information. 

_____ A draft product label. 

__X__ The product confidential statement of formula. 

_____ Information about a pending registration action. 

_____ FIFRA registration data. 

_____ The document is a duplicate of page(s) _______. 

_____ The document is not responsive to the request. 

_____ Proprietary information pertaining to the chemical 

 composition of an inert ingredient provided by the source 

 of the ingredient. 

_____ Attorney-Client Privilege. 

_____ Claimed Confidential by submitter upon submission to the 

 Agency. 

_____ Internal Deliberative Information. 

 

 

* The information not included is generally considered confidential by product 

registrants. If you have any questions, please contact the individual who 

prepared the response to your request. 

_________________________________________________________________
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                          5
<MULTIPLIER>                       1,000

<S>                                <C>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  MAY-31-2001
<PERIOD-START>                     JUN-1-2000
<PERIOD-END>                       AUG-31-2000
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      3-MOS
<CASH>                                           1,183
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   34,439
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,057
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    0
<PP&E>                                         456,917
<DEPRECIATION>                                 253,741
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 298,967
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               0
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                        11,235
<OTHER-SE>                                          0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   298,967
<SALES>                                         11,309
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                57,333
<CGS>                                            7,247
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   42,559
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 435
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 14,339
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,449
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,890
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,890
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.36
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.36


</TABLE>
#### § 22.320 Special competitions.

Some programs may be competed for programmatic or policy reasons among specific classes of potential recipients. An example would be a program to enhance U.S. capabilities for academic research and research-coupled graduate education in defense-critical, science and engineering disciplines, a program that would be competed specifically among institutions of higher education. All such special competitions shall be consistent with program representations in the President's budget submission to Congress and with subsequent Congressional authorizations and appropriations for the programs.
Order entered October 1 6 , 2017

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 17 - 01169 - CV No. 05 - 17 - 01170 - CV IN RE SENRICK SHERN WILKERSON, Relator Original Proceeding from the C riminal District Court No. 3

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No s . F10 - 01183 and F10 - 01184



### O RDER Before Justices Lang, Brown, and Stoddart Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS relator’s October 2, 2017 “petition for nunc pro tunc a nd order” for want of jurisdiction

. /s/ CRAIG STODDART JUSTICE
#### § 536.72 Finality of settlement.

A claimant's acceptance of an award, except for an advance payment or a split payment for property damage only, constitutes a release of the United States and its employees from all liability. Where applicable, a release should include the ARNG or the sending State. For further discussion see DA Pam 27-162, paragraph 2-82.
### §3417. Authorization of appropriations

There are hereby authorized to be appropriated out of any money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated such funds as are necessary to carry out the provisions of this chapter. The funds so appropriated shall not be available for payment of the expenses or expenditures of the Council in administering any provisions of any order issued pursuant to the terms of this chapter.

(Pub. L. 95–113, title XVII, §1719, Sept. 29, 1977, 91 Stat. 1040.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Oct. 1, 1977, see section 1901 of Pub. L. 95–113, set out as an Effective Date of 1977 Amendment note under section 1307 of this title.
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 32


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Environmental Tectonics
Corporation (the "Company") for the fiscal quarter ended August 27, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, William F. Mitchell, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and result of
              operations of the Company.


                                           /s/ William F. Mitchell
                                           ---------------------------------
                                               William F. Mitchell
                                               Chief Executive Officer


                                           /s/ Duane D. Deaner
                                           ---------------------------------
                                               Duane D. Deaner
                                               Chief Financial Officer

                                               October 12, 2004


         This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed to be filed by the Company for purpose
of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

Functional Statements >  Office of the Deputy Secretary

## Office of the Deputy Secretary (ODS)

                - ODS Functional Statement
                - ODS Organization Chart    PDF (91KB)
                - ODS Delegations of Authority

----

 

 Printable view

## How Do I Find...

          - Student loans, forgiveness
          - Higher Education Rulemaking
          - College accreditation
          - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
          - FERPA
          - FAFSA
          - 1098, tax forms

More >

## Information About...

          - Elevating Teaching
          - Early Learning
          - Engage Every Student
          - Unlocking Career Success
          - Cybersecurity

 

----

*Our mission*

Student Loans
Repaying LoansDefaulted LoansLoan ForgivenessLoan Servicers

Grants & Programs
Apply for Pell GrantsGrants ForecastApply for a Grant

Laws & Guidance
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)FERPACivil RightsNew IDEA Website

Data & Research
Education StatisticsPostsecondary Education DataED Data ExpressNation's Report CardWhat Works ClearinghouseOpen Data PlatformCOVID Relief Data

About Us
Contact UsED OfficesJobsPress ReleasesFAQsRecursos en españolBudget, PerformancePrivacy Program

----

          - Notices
          - FOIA
          - Privacy Policy
          - Accessibility
          - Security
          - Information quality
          - Inspector General
          - Whitehouse.gov
          - USA.gov
          - Benefits.gov
          - Regulations.gov
          - vote.gov
#### 1371.109 Minimization of delay due to Government furnished property.

Insert clause 1352.271-78, *Minimization of Delay Due to Government Furnished Property,* in all solicitations and contracts for ship construction and ship repair.
EXHIBIT 32.1
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with this quarterly report of Espey Mfg. & Electronics  Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended  September 30, 2007 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof,  I, Howard  Pinsley,
President and Chief Executive  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

      1.    The report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The  information  contained in this report fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

Date: November 12, 2007


                                             /s/ Howard Pinsley
                                             -----------------------------
                                             Howard Pinsley, President and
                                             Chief Executive Officer


                                       15
#### 1322.1001 Definitions.

The DOC labor advisor is the Assistant General Counsel for Administration/Employment & Labor Law Division.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                     EXHIBIT 23


                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


        We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement
Nos. 33-69672, 33-37396, and 33-40280 of OEC Medical Systems, Inc. on Forms S-8
of our report dated January 21, 1997, appearing in and incorporated by
reference in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of OEC Medical Systems, Inc. for
the year ended December 31, 1996.



/s/  DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
------------------------------
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP



Salt Lake City, Utah
March 26, 1997
### §323. Racial discrimination by colleges restricted

No money shall be paid out under this subchapter to any State or Territory for the support or maintenance of a college where a distinction of race or color is made in the admission of students, but the establishment and maintenance of such colleges separately for white and colored students shall be held to be a compliance with the provisions of said sections if the funds received in such State or Territory be equitably divided as hereinafter set forth: Provided, That in any State in which there has been one college established in pursuance of subchapter I of this chapter, and also in which an educational institution of like character has been established, or may be hereafter established, and is on August 30, 1890, aided by such State from its own revenue, for the education of colored students in agriculture and the mechanic arts, however named or styled, or whether or not it has received money prior to August 30, 1890, under said subchapter I, the legislature of such State may propose and report to the Secretary of Agriculture a just and equitable division of the fund to be received under this subchapter between one college for white students and one institution for colored students established as aforesaid, which shall be divided into two parts and paid accordingly, and thereupon such institution for colored students shall be entitled to the benefits of said sections and subject to their provisions, as much as it would have been if it had been included under subchapter I of this chapter, and the fulfillment of the foregoing provisions shall be taken as a compliance with the provision in reference to separate colleges for white and colored students.

(Aug. 30, 1890, ch. 841, §1, 26 Stat. 417; 1939 Reorg. Plan No. 1, §§201, 204, eff. July 1, 1939, 4 F.R. 2728, 53 Stat. 1424; 1953 Reorg. Plan No. 1, §§5, 8, eff. Apr. 11, 1953, 18 F.R. 2053, 67 Stat. 631; Pub. L. 96–88, title III, §301(a)(2)(E), Oct. 17, 1979, 93 Stat. 677; Pub. L. 97–98, title XIV, §1419, Dec. 22, 1981, 95 Stat. 1306.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section constitutes part of section 1 of act Aug. 30, 1890. Remainder of section 1 is classified to section 322 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of functions under this section to Secretary of Agriculture, see note set out under section 321 of this title.
Editorial Note on Part 724
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 724 appear at 65 FR 62616, Oct. 19, 2000.

§ 724.111 Punitive discharge. A discharge awarded by sentence of a court-martial. There are two types of punitive discharges: ( a ) *Bad conduct.* A separation from the naval service under conditions other than honorable. It may be effected only as a result of the approved sentence of a general or special court-martial.
( b ) *Dishonorable.* A separation from the naval service under dishonorable conditions. It may be effected only as a result of the approved sentence of a general court-martial.
#### *Alfred Weissman et al., Respondents, v Dominick Di Noto, Appellant.*

*In a summary holdover proceeding to recover possession of real*property, the tenant appeals (by permission) from an order of the Appellate Term of the Supreme Court for the Ninth and Tenth Judicial Districts, dated February 2, 1978, which (1) reversed a judgment of the County Court, Rockland County, entered May 13, 1977, after a nonjury trial, which had dismissed the landlords’ petition, and (2) directed entry of final judgment of possession in favor of the landlords. Order affirmed, with costs. In our opinion the tenant failed to comply substantially with the provisions of the commercial lease requiring him to (1) keep the sidewalks free from rubbish and (2) relinquish his nonexclusive right to sell candy and tobacco when a subsequent tenant demanded an exclusive right to sell those items. Since the conduct of the tenant did not constitute substantial compliance, the landlords’ termination of the lease was proper (see *Vanguard Diversified v Review Co.,*35 AD2d 102, 104-105; see, also, *First Nat. Stores v*Yellowstone *844Shopping Center, 21 NY2d 630). Damiani, J. P., Rabin, Gulotta and O'Con-nor, JJ., concur.
#### 1201.602 Contracting officers.
### Page 1of 1
reductions from 1 -hrozone SIP clarifications Jessi Hafer to: FrancesWicher 02/18/2009 01:37 PM Cc: "ROSS Badertscher" ShowDetails
History: This message has been replied to. Hello Frances, Sorry it's taken me so longto get back to you. One of the staff members who worked on the 1-hr ozone clarificationsdocument reviewed Table 1 for the categoriesyou asked about: Open Burn, Solvents, and School Buses. He concludedthat the Solvents and Open Burn Reductionsseem to be correct. Regarding the school bus reductions 

### - I think I can trace where the reduction came from, but 

### I don't think it's quite right:

a According to the 1-hr ozone plan El, the 2010 NOx emissions from school buses was 2.6 tpd. a The staff report from the rule development project (attached

## - see Appendix B, page 8-3) estimated that the baseline emissionsfrom school buses (based on surveys) was actually 473 tons per year (or 1.3tpd), and it projected reductions of 281.9 tons per year (or 0.7 tpd). This represents a reduction of 60%. a If we apply the 60% reduction to the 2010 NOx El from the l-hourozone plan, then the reduction would in fact be 1.6 tpd. a HOWEVER, the rule specifies that school bus fleet operators have until 2016 to comply with the rule, so we can't actually assume that we are achieving the full 60% reduction in 2010. 

### I don't know what a safer assumptionwould be. Since the rule was adopted in 2006, and there are ten years to come into full compliance, we could assume steady implementationso that in the fourth year (2010), there would be 40% implementation. This would put the reduction at 0.6 tpd reduction in 2010. Knowing that what we put in the 1-hr ozone clarificationsfor school buses isn't quite right, the next question would be, what do we do about it? Jessi 

### From: Ross Badertscher 

### Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2009 8:32 AM 

### To: Jessi Hafer 

### Subject: School Bus Emissions Jessi, The reductionsfor the other two rules in question (solventsand open burning) appear to be accurate. Let me know if you have any other questions. 

## Ross Badertscher Air Quality Specialist 

### San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District 1990 E. GettysburgAve. Fresno, CA 93726 (559) 230-581 2 www,val!eyai r..org


### file://C:\Documents

## and Settings\fwicher\Local

## Settings\Temp\notesBAAA25\-web2082.h..


## . 611 11201 

### 0
### §§4101 to 4110. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Sections 4101 to 4110 were omitted pursuant to section 4110 which provided that the National Agricultural Cost of Production Standards Review Board established by this chapter ceased to exist on Sept. 30, 1995.

Section 4101, Pub. L. 97–98, title X, §1005, Dec. 22, 1981, 95 Stat. 1261, established Board.

Section 4102, Pub. L. 97–98, title X, §1006, Dec. 22, 1981, 95 Stat. 1261; Pub. L. 99–198, title X, §1023(a), Dec. 23, 1985, 99 Stat. 1460; Pub. L. 101–624, title XI, §1145(a), Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 3516, provided for membership of Board, duration of terms of appointment, number of terms, and Chairman and Vice Chairman.

Section 4103, Pub. L. 97–98, title X, §1007, Dec. 22, 1981, 95 Stat. 1261, outlined functions of Board.

Section 4104, Pub. L. 97–98, title X, §1008, Dec. 22, 1981, 95 Stat. 1262, provided for meetings of Board.

Section 4105, Pub. L. 97–98, title X, §1009, Dec. 22, 1981, 95 Stat. 1262, related to Board recommendations to Secretary.

Section 4106, Pub. L. 97–98, title X, §1010, Dec. 22, 1981, 95 Stat. 1262, provided for reports by Board to Secretary and Congress.

Section 4107, Pub. L. 97–98, title X, §1011, Dec. 22, 1981, 95 Stat. 1262, provided for support and clerical services to assist Board.

Section 4108, Pub. L. 97–98, title X, §1012, Dec. 22, 1981, 95 Stat. 1262, provided for compensation and travel expenses for Board members.

Section 4109, Pub. L. 97–98, title X, §1013, Dec. 22, 1981, 95 Stat. 1262, authorized appropriations for this chapter.

Section 4110, Pub. L. 97–98, title X, §1014, Dec. 22, 1981, 95 Stat. 1263; Pub. L. 99–198, title X, §1023(b), Dec. 23, 1985, 99 Stat. 1460; Pub. L. 101–624, title XI, §1145(b), Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 3516, provided that Board would cease to exist on Sept. 30, 1995.
**EXHIBIT 13.6**

 

**CONSENT OF EXPERT**

 

We hereby consent to the use of our name contained in the technical report on the Property in the Bralorne of British Columbia, Canada dated October 20, 2016 entitled “Bralorne Gold Mine, British Columbia Canada” by Kirkham Geosystems Ltd. and Jasman Yee, P. Eng. and the reference as an expert contained in the Annual Report of Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 and incorporated by reference to the Company’s Registration Statements on Form S-8 (SEC File No.: 333-195120), Form F-3 (SEC File Nos.: 333-193471 and 333-195144) and Form F-10 (SEC File No.: 333-214396). 

 

** **KIRKHAM GEOSYSTEMS LTD.**    Dated: March 10, 2017By:*/s/ Garth Kirkham*
 

 
Garth Kirkham, P. Geo 

 **