alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §6504. National standards for organic production

To be sold or labeled as an organically produced agricultural product under this chapter, an agricultural product shall—

(1) have been produced and handled without the use of synthetic chemicals, except as otherwise provided in this chapter;

(2) except as otherwise provided in this chapter and excluding livestock, not be produced on land to which any prohibited substances, including synthetic chemicals, have been applied during the 3 years immediately preceding the harvest of the agricultural products; and

(3) be produced and handled in compliance with an organic plan agreed to by the producer and handler of such product and the certifying agent.

(Pub. L. 101–624, title XXI, §2105, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 3937; Pub. L. 102–237, title X, §1001(1), Dec. 13, 1991, 105 Stat. 1893.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1991—Par. (2). Pub. L. 102–237 substituted "; and" for period at end.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-1964
BARRY GREEN, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus WILLIAM K. SUTER, Clerk; CLAYTON R. HIGGINS, JR., Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (CA-05-1674-3) Submitted: January 31, 2006 Decided: February 10, 2006 Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Barry Green, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Barry Green, Jr., appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his civil action without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Green v. Suter , No. CA-05- 1674-3 (D.S.C. Aug. 18, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### 1252.216-71 Determination of Award Fee.

As prescribed in 1216.406-70(a), insert the following clause:

# Determination of Award Fee (NOV 2022)

(a) The Government shall evaluate Contractor performance at the end of each specified evaluation period to determine the amount of award. The contractor agrees that the amount of award and the award fee determination methodology are unilateral decisions to be made at the sole discretion of the Government.

(b) Contractor performance shall be evaluated according to the Award Fee Plan. The Contractor shall be periodically informed of the quality of its performance and areas in which improvements are expected.

(c) The contractor shall be promptly advised, in writing, of the determination and reasons why the award fee was or was not earned. The Contractor may submit a performance self-evaluation for each evaluation period. The amount of award is at the sole discretion of the Government but any self-evaluation received within___(*insert number*) days after the end of the current evaluation period will be given such consideration, as may be deemed appropriate by the Government.

(d) The amount of award fee that can be awarded in each evaluation period is limited to the amounts set forth at___(*identify location of award fee amounts*). Award fee that is not earned in an evaluation period cannot be reallocated to future evaluation periods.

(End of clause)
exv4w6



 







Exhibit 4.6




	 	 	 
	 

	 	State of Delaware
	 

	 	Secretary of State
	 

	 	Division of Corporations
	 

	 	Delivered 11:57 AM 01/18/2006
	 

	 	FILED 11:57 AM 01/18/2006
	 

	 	SRV 060046292 — 3961740 FILE





RESTATED


CERTIFICATE OF TRUST


OF


USB CAPITAL X



     THIS RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF TRUST of USB CAPITAL X (the ‘Trust”) is being duly
executed and filed by the undersigned, as trustees, to amend and restate under the Delaware
Statutory Trust Act
(12 Del. C. (Section) 3801 et seq.) the Certificate of Trust of the Trust which was originally
filed on April 27, 2005.



     The Certificate of Trust is hereby amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows:



     1. NAME. The name of the statutory trust is USB Capital X.



     2. DELAWARE
TRUSTEE. The name and business address of the trustee of the Trust
with a
principal place of business in the State of Delaware are Wilmington Trust Company, 1100 North
Market Street,
Wilmington, Delaware 19890.



     3. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Restated Certificate of Trust shall be effective upon
filing.



[Signature page follows]




 









 








     IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, being the trustees of the Trust, have executed this
Restated Certificate of Trust as of the date first above written.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY, not in its individual capacity but

solely as Trustee	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	By:
	 	/s/ Kristin L. Moore	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	Name: Kristin L. Moore

Title: Financial Services Officer	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	/s/ David M. Moffett	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	David M. Moffett, not in his individual capacity but solely

     as Administrative Trustee	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	/s/ Daryl N. Bible	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Daryl N. Bible, not in his individual capacity but solely

     as Administrative Trustee	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	/s/ Lee R. Mitau	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Lee R. Mitau, not in his individual capacity but solely

     as Administrative Trustee
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL

THE INSPECTOR GENERAL

MEMORANDUM

TO: Special Agent in Charge/Investigation, Boston/New York OIG Region

Special Agent in Charge/Investigation, Washington/Philadelphia 

 OIG Region ◄▬▬

Special Agent in Charge/Investigation, Atlanta OIG Region 

Special Agent in Charge/Investigation, Chicago OIG Region 

Special Agent in Charge/Investigation, Long Beach OIG Office

FROM: Assistant Inspector General for Investigation 

SUBJECT: Redelegation of Authority to Sign and Issue Inspector General's Subpoenas

I. DELEGATION

Under the authority vested in me by a delegation from the Inspector General, 

Delegation Control Number EF/EFI/148, certified July 23, 2004, I hereby delegate to 

you and to anyone serving for you in an acting capacity, the authority under Section 6 

(a) (4) of the Inspector General Act of 1978, as amended, to issue Inspector General's 

subpoenas in furtherance of the duties and functions of the Office of Inspector General.

Unless otherwise noted in future delegations of authority, amendments to the 

authorities delegated herein are included within the scope of this delegation.

II. RESERVATIONS

None.

III. REDELEGATION

This authority may not be redelegated.
Page 2 - Redelegation of Authority to Sign and Issue IG's Administrative Subpoenas 

IV. CERTIFICATION AND EFFECTIVE DATE

This delegation is effective upon certification by the Department's Delegation Control 

Officer and supersedes all previous delegations of this authority. I hereby ratify actions 

within the scope of this delegation taken by the addressees prior to certification of this 

delegation.

 ____________/s/__________

 William D. Hamel

OGC Clearance and Date: /s/ David Berthiaume, 12/22/08

Certified Date: 12/31/2008

Departmental Delegations Control Officer: /s/ Naty G. Beetle

Control Number: EFI/EFD3IW/178
MEMORANDUM

DATE: 09/11/2014

FROM: Laura Farris/EPA Region 8

TO: Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR–2013-0602

SUBJECT: Montana 111d Call held on 09/11/2014

SUMMARY: 

EPA participated in a conference call with the State of Montana on 09/11/2014 to discuss their 

questions about a mass-based goal under the Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants, which was 

proposed on June 2, 2014.

ATTENDEES:

EPA Headquarters

Gabrielle Stevens

Mikhail Adamantiades

Ryan Sims

EPA Region 8

Laura Farris

External Stakeholders

Dave Klemp and Craig Henrikson, Montana Department of Environmental Quality
Page 1 of 3

Disposition Comments

Docket No: FAA-2012-0143 These comments are in

Directorate ID: 2011-NM-077-AD response to an SNPRM

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

Next Step: FRAN SNPRM

 No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received – If this box is checked, no signatures are 

required.

 Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? If yes, 

list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously 

published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1C Chapter 9.

ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD: 

If NO, we don’t agree because 

ISSUE 2: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD:
Page 2 of 3

If NO, we don’t agree because 

For additional issues, double-click here
Page 3 of 3

Signature Section

Signature indicates concurrence with this action.

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

ASE Printed Name: Date

Branch Manager Date
§ 1656.18 Computation of creditable time. ( a ) Creditable time starts when the ASW begins work pursuant to an Order to Perform Alternative Service or 30 days after the issuance of such order, whichever occurs first. Creditable time will accumulate except for periods of: ( 1 ) Work of less than 35 hours a week or an employer's full-time work week whichever is greater;
( 2 ) Leaves of absence in a calendar year of more than 5 days in the aggregate granted by the employer to the ASW to attend to his personal affairs unless such absence is approved by the ASOM;
( 3 ) Time during which an ASW fails or neglects to perform satisfactorily his assigned Alternative Service;
( 4 ) Time during which the ASOM determines that work of the ASW is unsatisfactory because of his failure to comply with reasonable requirements of his employer;
( 5 ) Time during which the ASW is not employed in an approved job because of his own fault; or
( 6 ) Time during which the ASW is in a postponement period or his Order to Perform Alternative Service has been suspended.
( b ) Creditable time will be awarded for periods of travel, job placement and job interviews performed under orders issued by Selective Service. Creditable time may be awarded for normal employer leave periods.
( c ) Creditable time will be awarded to an ASW for the time lost after he leaves his job assignment following his request for reassignment on the basis of § 1656.13(b) of this part until he is reassigned pursuant to § 1656.13 (c) or (f) of this part. Creditable time for the corresponding period will be lost if neither the ASOM nor the District Appeal Board orders the ASW's reassignment on the basis of § 1656.12(a)(1) of this part.
[48 FR 16676, Apr. 19, 1983, as amended at 69 FR 20544, Apr. 16, 2004]
#### 1319.602-1 Referral.

When the contracting officer determines that the successful small business offeror lacks certain elements of responsibility, the contracting officer will withhold award and refer the matter to the cognizant Small Business Administration Government Contracting Area Office. A copy of the referral shall be provided to the Director of the OSDBU.
**Exhibit 10.28**

**2006 AMENDMENT TO**

**Tellabs Profit Sharing and Savings Plan & Tellabs Retirement Plan**

WHEREAS, Tellabs Operations, Inc. (the “Company”) maintains the Tellabs Profit Sharing and Savings Plan (the “Savings Plan”) andthe Tellabs Retirement Plan (the “Retirement Plan”) (collectively the “Plans”) for the benefit of its Eligible Employees and their Beneficiaries; 

WHEREAS, the Company has reserved the right to amend the Plans under the terms thereof; 

WHEREAS, the Board of Directorspursuant to an unanimous written consent dated April 3, 2006 approved amendment of the Plans to, among other things, provide for the trust to trust transfer of the Retirement Accounts under the Retirement Plan into the Savings Plan and changesto the trustee and investment funds available under the Savings Plan; 

WHEREAS, the Board of Directors authorized and directed the preparation andexecution of documents and taking of other actions necessary to reflect the foregoing and to maintain the tax-qualified status of the Plans. 

NOWTHEREFORE, effective as of the dates set forth below, the Plans are amended as follows: 

1. Effective April 3, 2006, the name of the Savings Plan ishereby changed to the “Tellabs 401(k) Plan.” 

2. Effective April 3, 2006, the restriction on investment of Participant Profit SharingAccounts is eliminated and Participants may elect to have the amounts in the Profit Sharing Accounts invested in any Fund available under the Savings Plan from time to time. 

3. Effective April 3, 2006, all Retirement Accounts under the Retirement Plan shall be transferred to and made a part of the Savings Plan. The provisions and restrictions in the Retirement Plan relating to aParticipant’s Retirement Account shall continue to apply after the transfer unless otherwise set forth in this Amendment. 

4. Effective April 3,2006, Retirement Accounts will be considered when determining if a Participant has an account balance below the force out limit in Section 7.1.(g) of the Plan. However, the Retirement Account may not be distributed as part of the force out.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Tellabs Operations, Inc. has caused this Amendment to be executed by a duly authorized officer as of this 29th day of December 2006.
Dolan Chemical Laboratory 4001 Bixby Road Groveport, OH 43125 T: 614-836-4221, Audinet 210-4221 F: 614-836-4168, Audinet 210-4168 http://aepenv/labs 

### Water Analysis Form REP-70 Rev. 0, 4/20



### Location: Mountaineer Plant Report Date: 1/18/2013 Sample Number: 130233-001 Date Collected:01/16/2013 09:00 Date Received:1/16/2013 

### Trip Blank Units Parameter Result RL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method MDL ng/L Mercury, Hg 0.5 0.50 TLT EPA 1631E 0.20 01/17/2013 

### Sample Number: 130233-002 Date Collected: 01/16/2013 09:00 Date Received:1/16/2013 

### Field Blank Units Parameter Result RL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method MDL ng/L Mercury, Hg < 0.5 0.50 TLT EPA 1631E 0.20 01/17/2013 

### Sample Number: 130233-003 Date Collected:01/16/2013 09:00 Date Received:1/16/2013 

## Plant Outfall #001 Units Parameter Result RL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method MDL ng/L Mercury, Hg 8.0 2.0 TLT EPA 1631E 0.80 01/17/2013 

### Sample Number: 130233-004 Date Collected:01/16/2013 09:00 Date Received:1/16/2013 

### Bioreactor Effluent Units Parameter Result RL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method MDL ng/L Mercury, Hg 7.1 1.0 TLT EPA 1631E 0.40 01/17/2013 

### Sample Number: 130233-005 Date Collected:01/16/2013 09:00 Date Received:1/16/2013 

## CPS Effluent Units Parameter Result RL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method MDL ng/L Mercury, Hg 150 20 TLT EPA 1631E 8.0 01/17/2013

THIS TEST REPORT RELATES ONLY TO THE ITEMS TESTED AND SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED EXCEPT IN FULL WITHOUT WRITTEN APPROVAL OF THE LABORATORY. ALL TEST RESULTS MEET ALL OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ACCREDITING AUTHORITY, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.

Brian Snyder, Chemist II Email bssnyder@aep.com Tel. 614-836-4224 Fax 614-836-4168 Audinet 210-4224

Mountaineer Plant, 130233 Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.3

ROATAN
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MEDICAL SERVICES CORP



Mr. Jerald L. Husman
Director, Environmental Services
Presbyterian Hospital of Dallas
82000 Walnut Hill Lane
Dallas, Texas 75231

                                                                 October 9, 1996

Re: Roatan Equipment

Dear Mr. Husman,

Following your discussion with Mark Hale and myself, we commit to the following:

o  Effective October 15, 1996, Roatan will bear the cost of the box/bag disposal
   shortfall daily, up to 1,470 lbs. at a cost of $.023/lb. This calculation
   is based on Presbyterian Hospital of Dallas (PHD) running the machines
   12 hours/day, 7 days/week. If PHD chooses not to run the machines on that
   basis, the shortfall will be reduced accordingly. PHD will be reimbursed by
   Roatan on a monthly basis until such time as the machines are operating
   consistently to represented specifications or 48 months, whichever comes
   first.

o  Roatan will reimburse PHD for labor costs at a rate of $8.30/hour, up to
   12 hours/day, up to 7 days/week for the time PHD chooses to operate the
   equipment, for the dedicated operation of the equipment during the same
   period of time described above. Roatan will train the operator to do
   preventive, simple maintenance.

o  Roatan will maintain 150 processing cans at PHD for 48 months. Defective
   cans will be replaced at no charge by Roatan during this period.

o  Roatan will maintain a stock of parts at PHD. These parts will include
   windows, "o" rings, filters, gaskets, sealants, and other commonly needed
   maintenance parts. PHD will provide secured storage for said materials at
   no cost to Roatan.

o  Roatan will provide a fourth sterilizer to PHD at no cost, at such time
   sterilizer efficiency is restored, and PHD has definable space. PHD will
   provide space and utility access; Roatan will install the machine and
   complete final hookups.

o  The terms and agreements between PHD and Roatan are not available as public
   information.


Thank you for your continued support. May I assure you that we are committed -
as indicated in the past - to bring our joint effort to a successful conclusion.


Sincerely yours,


/s/ W. H. LIESNER


W. H. Liesner
President

WHL/twl
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 6 (Monday, January 11, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2002-2003]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-00473]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION


Sunshine Act Meeting

TIME AND DATE: 
10:00 a.m., Thursday, January 14, 2021
Recess: 12:15 p.m.
12:30 p.m., Thursday, January 14, 2021

PLACE: Due to the COVID-19 Pandemic, the meeting will be open to the 
public via live webcast only. Visit the agency's homepage 
(www.ncua.gov.) and access the provided webcast link.

STATUS: Parts of this meeting will be open to the public. The rest of 
the meeting will be closed to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

PORTIONS OPEN TO THE PUBLIC: 
    1. Board Briefing, ACCESS Initiative.
    2. NCUA Rules and Regulations, Credit Union Service Organizations.
    3. Board Briefing, Statutory Inflation Adjustment of Civil Monetary 
Penalties.
    4. NCUA Rules and Regulations, Corporate Credit Unions.
    5. NCUA Rules and Regulations, CAMELS Rating System.
    6. NCUA Rules and Regulations, Risk Based Net Worth, Complex 
Threshold.
    7. NCUA's 2021 Annual Performance Plan.
    8. Board Briefing, Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021.

[[Page 2003]]

    9. NCUA Rules and Regulations, Simplification of Risk Based Capital 
Requirements.

PORTIONS CLOSED TO THE PUBLIC: 
    1. Supervisory Action. Closed pursuant to Exemptions (7), (8) and 
(9)(ii).
    2. Supervisory Action. Closed pursuant to Exemptions (5), (7), (8), 
(9)(i)(B) and (9)(ii).
    3. Delegation of Authority. Closed pursuant to Exemption (2).
    4. Personnel Action. Closed pursuant to Exemptions (2) and (6).
    5. Personnel Action. Closed pursuant to Exemptions (2) and (6).
    6. Board Briefing. Closed pursuant to Exemption (8).

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Melane Conyers-Ausbrooks, 
Secretary of the Board, Telephone: 703-518-6304.

Melane Conyers-Ausbrooks,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2021-00473 Filed 1-8-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7535-01-P
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Esterline Technologies Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended January 26, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-Q), I, Robert W. Cremin,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)    The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)    The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |     |  |                                                
|--------------------- |  | --- |  | -----------------------------------------------
|Dated:  March 7, 2007 |  | By: |  | /s/ Robert W. Cremin                           
|                      |  |     |  | Robert W. Cremin                               
|                      |  |     |  | Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>

                                                               Exhibit 13.(a)(2)

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                                  AS ENACTED BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report on Form 20-F of Ricoh Company, Ltd. (the
"Company") for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Zenji Miura,
Director, Corporate Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (s) 1350, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date: June 27, 2008

                                  By: /s/ Zenji Miura
                                     -------------------------------------------
                                     Zenji Miura
                                     Director,
                                     Corporate Executive Vice President
                                     and Chief Financial Officer