alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

In re Innovatio IP Ventures, LLC, Patent 

Litigation

___________________________

This Document Relates To:

All Cases

Case No. 1:12-cv-427

Judge James F. Holderman

Magistrate Judge Sidney Schenkier

ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

On this day, NETGEAR, Inc. (“NETGEAR”) and Innovatio IP Ventures, LLC, Innovatio 

Management, LLC, and Noel B. Whitley (collectively, “Innovatio”) announced to the Court that 

they have settled their respective claims for relief asserted in the above-captioned actions. The 

Court, having considered this request, is of the opinion that their request for dismissal should be 

GRANTED.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that all claims and counterclaims by NETGEAR against 

Innovatio and by Innovatio against NETGEAR in the above-captioned actions, including Case 

Nos. 1:11-cv-09308 (consolidated) and 1-12-cv-00427 (originally 1:11-cv-01139 (D. Del.)), are 

dismissed, with prejudice to the re-filing of same.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all claims by Innovatio against NETGEAR customers 

in any of the actions consolidated in Case No. 1:11-cv-09308 (including, but not limited to, 1:12-

cv-00427) based on their making (including using any apparatus or practicing any method in 

making), using, selling, offering for sale, leasing, exporting, importing, or otherwise disposing of

any NETGEAR product or any combination of a NETGEAR product with one or more other 

items, are dismissed, with prejudice to the re-filing of same.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all attorneys’ fees, costs of court and expenses shall be 

borne by the party incurring the same.

This is a final judgment.

Signed this 21st day of February, 2014.

___________________________________

JAMES F. HOLDERMAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
#### 10.003 Contract clause.

The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 52.210-1, Market Research, in solicitations and contracts over $6 million, other than solicitations and contracts for the acquisition of commercial products or commercial services.

[86 FR 61021, Nov. 4, 2021]
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 15








TXU Gas Company:

We have made a review, in accordance with standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States), of the unaudited condensed
consolidated interim financial information of TXU Gas Company and subsidiaries
(TXU Gas) as of June 30, 2004 and for the three-month and six-month periods
ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, as indicated in our report dated August 13, 2004;
because we did not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on that
information.

We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included in TXU Gas'
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004, is
incorporated by reference in Registration Statements Nos. 333-85769,
333-85769-01, 333-85769-02 and 333-85769-03 on Form S-3.

We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under
the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration
Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or
certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.


DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP



Dallas, Texas
August 13, 2004
"EXHIBIT 21"

                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES



Subsidiaries of International Bancshares Corporation

        NAME                      BUSINESS               % OF OWNERSHIP
      --------                    --------               --------------
IBC Subsidiary Corporation        Bank Holding Company        100%
IBC Life Insurance Company        Credit Life Insurance       100%
IBC Trading Company               Export Trading              100%
IBC Capital Corporation           Investments                 100%

Subsidiaries of IBC Subsidiary Corporation

        NAME                      BUSINESS               % OF OWNERSHIP
      --------                    --------               --------------
International Bank of Commerce    State Bank                  100%
Commerce Bank                     State Bank                  100%
International Bank of Commerce,
  Zapata                          State Bank                  100%
International Bank of Commerce,
  Brownsville                     State Bank                  100%



                                        130
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                  5
<MULTIPLIER>               1,000
       
<S>                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                     6-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                 MAR-31-1996 
<PERIOD-END>                                      SEP-30-1995 
<CASH>                                                 14,301               
<SECURITIES>                                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                                          37,187
<ALLOWANCES>                                            3,535    
<INVENTORY>                                            33,205
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                       95,707
<PP&E>                                                 10,802   
<DEPRECIATION>                                          6,282
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        109,623
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                  36,615
<BONDS>                                                20,750
<COMMON>                                                  403
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                       0
<PREFERRED>                                             9,000
<OTHER-SE>                                             42,359
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          109,623
<SALES>                                               144,406
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                      144,406
<CGS>                                                 130,692
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         130,692
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       12,923
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          617
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      1,294
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        (1,120)
<INCOME-TAX>                                              154
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    (1,274)
<DISCONTINUED>                                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                             0
<CHANGES>                                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                           (1,274)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                            (.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            (.04)
        

</TABLE>
### §136p. Exemption of Federal and State agencies

The Administrator may, at the Administrator's discretion, exempt any Federal or State agency from any provision of this subchapter if the Administrator determines that emergency conditions exist which require such exemption. The Administrator, in determining whether or not such emergency conditions exist, shall consult with the Secretary of Agriculture and the Governor of any State concerned if they request such determination.

(June 25, 1947, ch. 125, §18, as added Pub. L. 92–516, §2, Oct. 21, 1972, 86 Stat. 995; amended Pub. L. 94–140, §8, Nov. 28, 1975, 89 Stat. 754; Pub. L. 100–532, title VIII, §801(k), Oct. 25, 1988, 102 Stat. 2682; Pub. L. 102–237, title X, §1006(b)(1), (2), Dec. 13, 1991, 105 Stat. 1895.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1991—Pub. L. 102–237 substituted "the Administrator" for "he" before "determines" and "the Administrator's" for "his".

1988—Pub. L. 100–532 substituted "and" for "or" in section catchline, and directed that sentence beginning "The Administrator, in" be run in after first sentence beginning "The Administrator may".

1975—Pub. L. 94–140 inserted provision requiring Administrator to consult with Secretary of Agriculture and Governor of State concerned in determining whether an emergency situation exists.

#### Effective Date of 1988 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 100–532 effective on expiration of 60 days after Oct. 25, 1988, see section 901 of Pub. L. 100–532, set out as a note under section 136 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

For effective date of section, see section 4 of Pub. L. 92–516, set out as a note under section 136 of this title.
|   | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                 |   |                        |   |
|----------------------|--------|-----------------------------|--------|
| Date: April 17, 2014 | By:    | /s/ Malcolm Davidson        |   |
|                 |   | Malcolm Davidson            |   |
|                 |   | Principal Financial Officer |   |
|                 |   |                        |   |
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Administration [Docket No. DEA-756]
 AGENCY: Drug Enforcement Administration, Justice.
 ACTION: Notice of application.
 SUMMARY: Cedarburg Pharmaceuticals has applied to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of basic class(es) of controlled substance(s). Refer to Supplemental Information listed below for further drug information.
 DATES: Registered bulk manufacturers of the affected basic class(es), and applicants therefore, may file written comments on or objections to the issuance of the proposed registration on or before March 15, 2021. Such persons may also file a written request for a hearing on the application on or before March 15, 2021.
 ADDRESSES: Written comments should be sent to: Drug Enforcement Administration, Attention: DEA Federal Register Representative/DPW, 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with 21 CFR 1301.33(a), this is notice that on October 16, 2020, Cedarburg Pharmaceuticals 870 Badger Circle, Grafton, Wisconsin 53024, applied to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of the following basic class(es) of controlled substance(s): Controlled substance
Drug code
ScheduleTetrahydrocannabinols
7370
I3, 4-Methylenedioxymethamphetamine
7405
IDimethyltryptamine
7435
IPsilocybin
7437
IMethylphenidate
1724
IINabilone
7379
II4-Anilino-N-phenethyl-4-piperidine (ANPP)
8333
IIFentanyl
9801
II
 The company plans to manufacture bulk active pharmaceutical ingredients (API) for distribution to its customers. In reference to the drug code 7370 (Tetrahydrocannabinols), the company plans to bulk manufacture as synthetic. No other activity for this drug code is authorized for this registration. William T. McDermott, Assistant Administrator.


[FR Doc. 2021-00351 Filed 1-11-21; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE P
### §1738q. Notification to congressional committees

#### (a) Notice of negotiations

The Secretary of State and the Secretary of the Treasury shall, in every feasible instance, notify the designated congressional committees not less than 15 days prior to any formal negotiation for debt relief under this subchapter.

#### (b) Transmittal of text of agreements

The Secretary of State shall transmit to the designated congressional committees a copy of the text of any agreement with any foreign government which would result in any debt relief under this subchapter no less than 30 days prior to its entry into force, together with a detailed justification of the interest of the United States in the proposed debt relief.

#### (c) Annual report

The Secretary of State or the Secretary of the Treasury, as appropriate, shall submit to the designated congressional committees not later than February 1 of each year a consolidated statement of the budgetary implications of all debt relief agreements entered into force under this subchapter during the preceding fiscal year.

#### (d) Designated congressional committees

As used in this section, the term "designated congressional committees" means the Committee on Agriculture and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry of the Senate.

(July 10, 1954, ch. 469, title VI, §618, as added Pub. L. 102–532, §2, Oct. 27, 1992, 106 Stat. 3511.)
#### The People of the State of Illinois ex rel. Nancy Healy, defendant in error, v. Edwin Robie, plaintiff in error.

Gen. No. 29,171.

Bastardy proceeding. Judgment against the defendant. Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. William L. Morgan, Judge, presiding. Heard in the third division of this court for the first district at the March term, 1924.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed February 11, 1925.

Rehearing denied March 5, 1925.

Arthur W. Kettles and Charles W. Bidwill, for plaintiff in error.

Robert E. Crowe, State’s Attorney, for defendant in error.

Mr. Justice Thomson

delivered the opinion of the court.
1 DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION DIVISION



### NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING AND PROPOSED AMENDMENTS

TO GEORGIA’S STATE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

TO ALL INTERESTED PERSONS AND PARTIES:

Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to the authority set forth below, the Environmental Protection Division (hereinafter, “EPD”) of the Georgia Department of Natural Resources proposes amendments to Georgia’s State Implement ation Plan (SIP). The proposed revision is

described below:

The proposed State Implementation Plan revision includes Georgia's request under the Clean Air Act that the metro Atlanta region 8-hour ozone nonattainment area be redesignated to attainment with respect to the 1997 National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) for Ozone as well as Georgia’s plan to maintain attainment of the ozone standard in the Atlanta area.

This notice is being provided to all persons who have requested in writing that they be placed on a notification list. The proposed SIP revision may be viewed at

http://www.georgiaair.org/airpermit/html/planningsupport/regdev/sips_and_revisions/sips_and_revisions.htm or during normal business hours of 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. at the Georgia Environmental Protection Division, Air Protection Branch, 4244 International Parkway, Suite 120, Atlanta, Georgia 30354. Copies may also be requested by contacting the Air Protection Branch at 404/363-7000 or the

Environmental Protection Division Director’s Office at 1-888-373-5947.

To provide the public an opportunity to comment upon and provide input into the proposed SIP revision, a public hearing will be held at 3:00 p.m. on February 27, 2012, in the EPD Training Center located at 4244 International Parkway, Suite 116, Atlanta, Georgia 30354. At the hearing, anyone may present data, make a statement, comment or offer a viewpoint or argument either orally or in writing. Lengt hy statements or statements of a considerable technical or economic nature, as well as previ ously recorded messages, must be submitted in writing for the official record. Oral statements should be concise.

Written comments are welcomed. To insure their inclusion in EPD's final submission of the SIP revision to EPA, written comments should be received by close of business by March 5, 2012. Written comments may be emailed to EPDComments@dnr.state.ga.us or sent via regular mail addressed to: Branch Chief, Air Protection Branch, 4244 International Parkway, Suite 120, Atlanta, Georgia, 30354.

The proposed SIP revision is proposed pursuant to authority contained in Georgia Air Quality Act (O.C.G.A. Section 12-9-1 et. seq.). For further information, contact the Air Protection

Branch at 404/363-7000.
#### Monsey Manufacturing Co. Inc., et al., Appellants, v. Florence Ocko, Individually and as Executrix of Samuel Ocko, Deceased, Respondent.

In an action by three taxpayers pursuant to statute (Town Law, § 268, subd. 2), to enjoin the violation of a zoning ordinance of the Town of Ramapo, the plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Rockland County, rendered December 20, 1958 upon the decision of an Official Referee, after a nonjury trial before him, dismissing the complaint on the merits. By this court’s prior decision of November 27, 1961 (14 A D 2d 925), the judgment was reversed and an injunction granted in certain enumerated respects against the then named defendants, Florence Ocko and Samuel Ocko, husband and wife. Thereafter, on motion of Florence, who apprised the court for the first time that her husband had died before the appeal had been heard, we vacated our decision insofar as it pertained to the deceased defendant, substituted his wife Florence as the executrix of his estate, directed that the appeal be reconsidered as to such executrix and granted permission to file additional briefs (15 A D 2d 951). Such briefs have been filed; the appeal has been reconsidered. Upon reconsideration, the appeal, insofar as it concerns the substituted defendant, Florence Ocko, as executrix of the estate of Samuel Ocko, deceased, is dismissed, without costs; and the action as against such substituted defendant is directed to be discontinued, without costs. With respect to the deceased Samuel Ocko or his estate, the appeal and the action have now been rendered academic. It appears that he had been originally joined as a party defendant to this action only because he was the one who managed the farm and cold storage warehouse (owned solely by the codefendant Florence Ocko), which was the situs of the zoning ordinance violations. Since such management terminated upon his decease, there is no longer any necessity for an injunction against him or his estate. Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Hill, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                                                                                Exhibit 99 (d)
                                      TXU Gas Company
                                 Detail of Long-Term Debt as of
                                      September 30, 2002


                                                            Interest Rate                     Principal     Maturity
         Description                                            Basis      Coupon Rate         Amount         Date
-----------------------------------                         -------------  -----------        ---------     --------
                                                                                       (In millions)
<S>                                                              <C>           <C>             <C>         <C>
Putable Asset Term Securities........................            Fixed         7.625%           $ 200(a)   10/15/12
ENSERCH 6 1/4% Notes.................................            Fixed         6.250%             125        1/1/03
ENSERCH 6 3/8% Notes.................................            Fixed         6.375%             150        2/1/04
ENSERCH 7 1/8% Notes.................................            Fixed         7.125%             150       6/15/05
ENSERCH Remarketed Reset Notes.......................            Fixed         6.564%             125        1/1/08
  Unamortized  premium and discount....................            N/A                              1
                                                                                                -----
    Total TXU Gas (Including Debt Due Currently)....                                            $ 751

(a)  These securities were redeemend October 15,2002.  See Note 4 to Financial Statements.
</TABLE>
P.1 

OAR Box 1830 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

44) IV-C-10 

Docket Number: 

A-87-11 

Printed 11/13/2008 7:20:53 AM Sheet 44 of 232 
P.2 

USB. 

* l PRO*0 

/ 

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 

DEC I 4 / 3] 

OFFICE OF 

AIR AND RADIATION 

Honorable William A. Clark 

House Office Buildinq 

Room 326 

House of Delegates 

Annapolis, Maryland 7.1401-1991 

Dear Mr. Clark: 

Thank you for your comments regarding our onboard 

refueling and gasoline volatility proposals. As you know, we 

completed extensive and detailed analyses involving a variety 

of issues to support both proposed- programs. We expect to 

receive numerous comments during the comment period (which ends 

February 11, 1988). We will consider your comments and all the 

others we receive, and we will make revisions in our analyses 

as appropriate. 

We will place your letter in the public dockets for the 

two rulemakings. Please contact my staff if we can be of 

further assistance. 

Sincerely yours, 

Richard D. Wilson 

Director, Office of Mobile Sources 
P.3 

t IUUU I V _-_> 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

JAN I I 1988 

CBMTI'i/V. riHCKET 

c.!" ' '::\! 
P.4 

WILLIAM A . CLARK 

HARFORD COUNTY 

DISTRICT 35-A 

MEMBER: 

ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS COMMITTEE 

HOUSE OF DELEGATES 

ANNAPOLIS , MARYLAN D 21401-1991 

DELEGATION OFFICE: 

HOUSE OFFICE BUILDING 

ROOM 326 

ANNAPOLIS. MARYLAND 21401 -1 991 

841-3289 

DISTRICT OFFICE: 

252 3 BRADFIEL D AVENU E 

B E L AIR. MARYLAN D 21014-110 1 

838-9433 

November 18, 19 87 

Mr. Lee M. Thomas 

Administrator 

Environmental Protection Agency 

401 M Street, Waterside Mall 

Washington, D.C. 20450 

Dear Mr. Thomas, 

May I register my position along with that of the 

Maryland Petroleum Council in favor of onboard cannisters 

and _in opposition to Stage II controls at gasoline outlets. 

In addition, concerning proposed reductions in motor' 

gasoline volatility as another means of controlling 

hydrocarbons, I believe that this is a very costly process 

requiring additional crude petroleum thereby increasing our 

dependence on foreign oil. I feel the best approach is to 

implement the onboard cannister and cap in-use fuel at the 

ASTM summertime limits. 

May I commend you for your tenacity in attempting to 

reduce ozone loss through control of hydrocarbon emissions. 

I would be more than glad to be of help to you in this 

matter. 

With kind regards, I remain 

Sincerely, 

" William A. Clark 

Delegate 35A 

WAC:mw
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Esterline Technologies Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended April 27, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-Q), I, Robert W. Cremin,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)    The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)    The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |     |  |                                                
|-------------------- |  | --- |  | -----------------------------------------------
|Dated:  June 5, 2007 |  | By: |  | /s/ Robert W. Cremin                           
|                     |  |     |  | Robert W. Cremin                               
|                     |  |     |  | Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer