alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Sheet1

Even Start

Reading First State Grants

School Improvement Grants

ESEA Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

Educational Technology State Grants

State or

Other Area

Arizona

Arkansas

California

State or

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

Compiled for posting on the WEB by the Budget Service on March 22, 2011.

State Agency Program Migrant

State Agency Program--Neglected and Delinquent

Comprehensive School Reform (Title I)

Impact Aid Basic Support Payments

Impact Aid Payments for Children with Disabilities

Impact Aid Construction

Improving Teacher Quality State Grants

Mathematics and Science Partnerships

Educational Technology State Grants

21st Century Community Learning Centers

State Assessments

Rural and Low Income Schools Program

Small, Rural School Achievement Program

Indian Education Grants to Local Educational Agencies

Safe and Drug Free Schools and Communities State Grants

Language Acquisition State Grants

Education for Homeless Children and Youth

Special Education Grants to States

Special Education Preschool Grants

Grants for Infants and Families

Career and Technical Education State Grants

Tech-Prep Education State Grants

State Fiscal Stabilization Fund State Grants - Education Fund

State Fiscal Stabilization Fund State Grants - Government Services

Federal Pell Grants

Federal Supplemental Educational Opportunity Grants

Federal Work Study

Leveraging Educational Assistance Partnership

Byrd Honors Scholarships

College Access Challenge Grants

Vocational Rehabilitation State Grants

Client Assistance State Grants

Protection and Advocacy of Individual Rights

Supported Employment State Grants

Indepent Living State Grants

Services for Older Blind Individuals

Assistive Technology State Grants

Protection and Advocacy for Assistive Technology

Adult Basic and Literacy Education State Grants

English Literacy and Civics Education State Grants

State Grants for Incarcerated Youth Offenders

Federal Direct Student Loan Program

Federal Family Education Loan Program

Grand Total

Centers for Independent Living
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

BETTIE MONTGOMERY, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) No. 11 C 9196

)

AMERICA’S SERVICING COMPANY, )

)

Defendant. )

MEMORANDUM ORDER

After some false starts, attorney Sidney Smith, who had

really prepared the Complaint filed by nominally pro se plaintiff

Bettie Montgomery (“Montgomery”), finally filed an appearance on

Montgomery’s behalf along with a motion seeking more time to file

a new version of the Complaint that would conform to the

directives of Fed. R. Civ. P. (“Rule”) 8. This Court granted

that motion, with the amended pleading due on or before May 8 and

the next status hearing scheduled for May 14.

But it is painfully obvious that attorney Smith is

unfamiliar with practice in this District Court (and perhaps

federal courts generally). For example, at the status hearing

earlier this week he asked for leave to file an “oversize brief”

on the mistaken assumption that this District Court’s LR 7.1,

which does impose such a limitation in the course of briefing

contested motions, somehow cabins pleadings such as complaints.1

 That said, this Court hopes that the mistaken motion does 1

not presage still another needlessly prolix version of

Montgomery’s Complaint.

Case: 1:11-cv-09196 Document #: 29 Filed: 04/23/12 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:516
But what prompts this memorandum order is attorney Smith’s

April 16 filing, the Judge’s Copy of which has been delivered to

this Court’s chambers, of some 120 pages of evidentiary material

that play no proper role at all in the federal pleading process. 

Hence all of Dkt. Nos. 23-1, 23-2 and 23-3 are stricken from the

file. Attorney Smith is expected to familiarize himself promptly

with the standards applicable to practice in federal courts

generally, and in this District Court particularly.

________________________________________

Milton I. Shadur

Senior United States District Judge

Date: April 23, 2012

2

Case: 1:11-cv-09196 Document #: 29 Filed: 04/23/12 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:517
### §5351. Definitions

For the purpose of this subchapter—

(1) "agency" means an Executive agency, a military department, and the government of the District of Columbia; and

(2) "student-employee" means—

(A) a student nurse, medical or dental intern, resident-in-training, student dietitian, student physical therapist, and student occupational therapist, assigned or attached to a hospital, clinic, or medical or dental laboratory operated by an agency; and

(B) any other student-employee, assigned or attached primarily for training purposes to a hospital, clinic, or medical or dental laboratory operated by an agency, who is designated by the head of the agency with the approval of the Office of Personnel Management.

(Pub. L. 89–554, Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 472; Pub. L. 95–454, title IX, §906(a)(2), Oct. 13, 1978, 92 Stat. 1224.)

| Derivation | U.S. Code | Revised Statutes and Statutes at Large |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | 5 U.S.C. 1052. | Aug. 4, 1947, ch. 452, §2, 61 Stat. 727. |

Statutes at Large

The section is restated in definition form. In paragraph (1), the words "an Executive agency, a military department" are coextensive with and substituted for "department, agency, or instrumentality of the Federal Government" in view of the definitions in sections 105 and 102.

The exception from the Classification Act of 1923, as amended, is omitted as obsolete and superseded by the Classification Act of 1949, as amended, which is carried into this title. The present exception from the Classification Act of 1949, as amended, is carried into section 5102(c)(16).

Standard changes are made to conform with the definitions applicable and the style of this title as outlined in the preface to the report.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1978—Par. (2)(B). Pub. L. 95–454 substituted "Office of Personnel Management" for "Civil Service Commission".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1978 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 95–454 effective 90 days after Oct. 13, 1978, see section 907 of Pub. L. 95–454, set out as a note under section 1101 of this title.
### §§1736c, 1736d. Repealed. Pub. L. 104–127, title II, §§218, 219, Apr. 4, 1996, 110 Stat. 957

Section 1736c, act July 10, 1954, ch. 469, title IV, §409, as added Nov. 11, 1966, Pub. L. 89–808, §2(E), 80 Stat. 1537; amended July 29, 1968, Pub. L. 90–436, §1, 82 Stat. 450; Nov. 30, 1970, Pub. L. 91–524, title VII, §701, 84 Stat. 1379; Aug. 10, 1973, Pub. L. 93–86, §1(26), 87 Stat. 237; Sept. 29, 1977, Pub. L. 95–113, title XII, §1208, 91 Stat. 957; Dec. 22, 1981, Pub. L. 97–98, title XII, §1216, 95 Stat. 1282; Dec. 23, 1985, Pub. L. 99–198, title XI, §1105, 99 Stat. 1466; Nov. 28, 1990, Pub. L. 101–624, title XV, §1512, 104 Stat. 3653; Dec. 13, 1991, Pub. L. 102–237, title III, §322, 105 Stat. 1857, required promulgation of regulations to implement chapter not later than 180 days after Nov. 28, 1990.

Section 1736d, act July 10, 1954, ch. 469, title IV, §410, as added Nov. 11, 1966, Pub. L. 89–808, §2(E), 80 Stat. 1538; amended Nov. 28, 1990, Pub. L. 101–624, title XV, §1512, 104 Stat. 3653; Dec. 13, 1991, Pub. L. 102–237, title III, §322, 105 Stat. 1857, provided for independent evaluation of programs under subchapters II, III, and III–A of this chapter and report to Congress.
### §347. Repealed. Pub. L. 86–533, §1(21), June 29, 1960, 74 Stat. 249

Section, acts May 8, 1914, ch. 79, §7, 38 Stat. 374; June 26, 1953, ch. 157, §1, 67 Stat. 85, required Secretary of Agriculture to report to Congress receipts, expenditures, and results of cooperative agriculture extension work in all States, Territories, or possessions receiving benefits of sections 341 to 343, 344 to 346, and 347a to 349 of this title.
Page 2 – Delegation of Authority

**UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION**

# THE SECRETARY

# MEMORANDUM

TO:          The Chief Financial Officer   ◄▬▬▬

             Federal Student Aid

THROUGH:The Chief Operating Officer

Federal Student Aid

FROM:    The Secretary

SUBJECT:  Delegation of Authority to Approve Transactions Regarding Purchases of Federal Family Education Loans by the Department

## I. DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY

Under the authority vested in me by Section 412 of the Department of Education Organization Act, Public Law 96-88, 20 U.S.C. §3472, as amended, and in accordance with Sections 141-143 of the Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended (HEA), I hereby delegate to you, to your successor in function, and to anyone serving for you in an acting capacity, the authority provided under Section 459A of the HEA or other applicable law to approve  agreements and modifications of agreements with lenders to purchase Federal Family Education Loan Program loans, and to execute documents pertinent to these transactions.

Unless otherwise noted in future delegations of authority, amendments to the authority delegated herein are included in the scope of this delegation.

## II. RESERVATIONS

The authority to determine the need for loan capital or to establish the terms and conditions governing the purchase of loans is reserved.  

## III. REDELEGATION

This authority may not be redelegated.

## IV. CERTIFICATION AND EFFECTIVE DATE

This delegation is effective upon certification by the Department’s Principal Delegations Control Officer and supersedes all previous redelegations of these authorities.

I hereby ratify actions within the scope of this delegation taken by you prior to the date of certification.

___________/s/_______________ 

 Arne Duncan

OGC Clearance and Date:  /s/ Tracey Sasser, 9/28/2010

Certified Date:  10/7/2010 

Departmental Delegations Control Officer:  /s/ Naty G. Beetle

Control Number:  EA/ENJ/73
II 

Calendar No. 132 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 703 

[Report No. 115–102] 

To extend the authority of the Secretary of the Interior to carry out the 

Equus Beds Division of the Wichita Project. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 22, 2017 

Mr. MORAN (for himself and Mr. ROBERTS) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

JUNE 8, 2017 

Reported by Ms. MURKOWSKI, without amendment 

A BILL 

To extend the authority of the Secretary of the Interior 

to carry out the Equus Beds Division of the Wichita Project. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Wichita Project Equus 

5 Beds Division Authorization Extension Act’’. 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 703 RS

1 SEC. 2. EQUUS BEDS DIVISION. 

2 Section 10(h) of Public Law 86–787 (74 Stat. 1026; 

3 120 Stat. 1474) is amended by striking ‘‘10 years’’ and 

4 inserting ‘‘20 years’’. 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS

rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 132 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 703 

[Report No. 115–102] 

A BILL 

To extend the authority of the Secretary of the Inthe Wichita Project. terior to carry out the Equus Beds Division of 

JUNE 8, 2017 

Reported without amendment 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
#### 1.701 Definition.

*Determination and Findings* (D&F) means a special form of written approval by an authorized official that is required by statute or regulation as a prerequisite to taking certain contract actions. The *determination* is a conclusion or decision supported by the *findings.* The findings are statements of fact or rationale essential to support the determination and must cover each requirement of the statute or regulation.

[50 FR 1726, Jan. 11, 1985, and 50 FR 52429, Dec. 23, 1985, as amended at 67 FR 13053, Mar. 20, 2002]
### §7032. Accessing information and filing over the Internet

#### (a) In general

Not later than 2 years after June 20, 2000, in accordance with subsection (b), the Secretary shall expand implementation of the Internet-based system established under section 7031 of this title by enabling agricultural producers to access and file all forms and, at the option of the Secretary, selected records and information of the agencies of the Department specified in section 7031(b) of this title.

#### (b) Implementation

In carrying out subsection (a), the Secretary shall ensure that an agricultural producer is able—

(1) to file electronically or in paper form, at the option of the agricultural producer, all forms required by agencies of the Department specified in section 7031(b) of this title;

(2) to file electronically or in paper form, at the option of the agricultural producer, all documentation required by agencies of the Department specified in section 7031(b) of this title and determined appropriate by the Secretary; and

(3) to access information of the Department concerning farm programs, quarterly trade, economic, and production reports, and other similar production agriculture information that is readily available to the public in paper form.

(Pub. L. 106–222, §3, June 20, 2000, 114 Stat. 354.)
*Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited sircumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_______________________

No. 98-30996 

_______________________

BRENDA B. CAMPBELL,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

NORMAN R. GORDON & ASSOCIATES; NORMAN R. GORDON; JEFFREY S. COX,

Defendants-Appellees.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

(97-CV-1467)

_________________________________________________________________

August 6, 1999

Before JONES, STEWART, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The court has carefully considered this appeal in light

of the parties’ briefs and oral argument and pertinent portions of

the record. We reach the following conclusions.

First, assuming arguendo that a claim exists for

pregnancy harassment in violation of the Pregnancy Discrimination

Act, appellant has not adduced facts demonstrating that her

supervisor’s conduct rose to the level of actionable harassment

according to Faragher v. City of Boca Raton, _____ U.S. _____, 118

S.Ct. 2275, 2283-84 (1998). That is, the alleged harassing
conduct, consisting of harangues and complaints by appellant’s

supervisor and requirements for doctors’ excuses for her absences,

was not so severe and pervasive as to alter the terms or conditions

of appellant’s employment.

Second, appellant has not produced evidence to raise a

genuine issue of material fact that she endured disparate treatment

because of her pregnancy rather than because of her unreliable

attendance and difficulties keeping up with her job.

Third, appellant’s claims of termination, retaliation,

and intentional infliction of emotional distress are not supported

by relevant summary judgment evidence.

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Case: 1:11-cv-08987 Document #: 94-1 Filed: 10/01/14 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:1094

Case: 1:11-cv-08987 Document #: 94-1 Filed: 10/01/14 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:1095

Case: 1:11-cv-08987 Document #: 94-1 Filed: 10/01/14 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:1096
Exhibit 10.36

             Executive Officer Compensation - Revised and Restated

1.       Upon the request of Stephen H. Wacknitz, CEO, President and Chairman,
         the Employment Agreement of Mr. Wacknitz was modified, by agreement
         dated February 2, 2006, to reduce his annual incentive bonus from 6% to
         5% of Temecula Valley Bancorp Inc. (the "Company") net income before
         income taxes and bonuses, payable by the Bank.

2.       Mr. Wacknitz's annual base salary was increased from $350,000 to
         $400,000.

3.       The annual base salary of James Andrews, Executive Vice President/Real
         Estate Industries Group, was increased from $180,000 to $210,000. For
         calendar year 2006, Mr. Andrews' annual incentive bonus will be based
         upon the following: 2.5% (previously reported at 2%) of the pre-tax
         post bonus net income of the Bank's Real Estate Industries Group. This
         amount will be outside the executive officer bonus pool.

4.       The annual base salary of Thomas Shepherd, Senior Executive Vice
         President and Chief Credit Officer, was increased from $180,000 to
         $210,000.
#### 1252.239-79 Authentication, Data Integrity, and Non-Repudiation.

As prescribed in 1239.7204(d), insert a clause substantially as follows:

# Authentication, Data Integrity, and Non-Repudiation (NOV 2022)

The Contractor shall provide a [*Fill-in: Contracting Officer fill-in the “cloud service” name*] system that implements ___ [*Contracting Officer insert the required level (1-4) of FIPS 140-2 encryption standard*] that provides for origin authentication, data integrity, and signer non-repudiation.

(End of clause)
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6675
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus EDWARD R. FOX, JR., a/k/a Skip Fox, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Henry C. Morgan, Jr., District Judge. (CR-94-44, CA-96-111-4) Submitted: September 11, 1997 Decided: September 22, 1997 Before RUSSELL, MURNAGHAN, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Edward R. Fox, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Robert Edward Bradenham, II, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion andfind no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Fox , Nos. CR-94-44; CA-96-111-4 (E.D. Va. Apr. 23, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 5.0.3

Eastern Division

Nicholas Martin

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:12−cv−00215

Honorable Morton Denlow

Dun & Bradstreet, Inc., et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Tuesday, August 21, 2012:

 MINUTE entry before Honorable Morton Denlow:Status hearing held on

8/21/2012 and continued to 12/6/2012 at 10:00 a.m. For the reasons stated in open court,

Plaintiff's motion for Class Certification [4] is granted without prejudice subject to the

Defendants seeking to decertify the class on or before 12/19/2012. The class is hereby

defined as all persons nationwide who defendant or some person on its behalf called on

their cell phone using a device that has the capacity to dial numbers without human

intervention, where defendant obtained the phone number from some source other than

directly from the called party, where any call was made between and including a date two

years prior to the filing of this action, ongoing.Mailed notice(ldg, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:12-cv-00215 Document #: 37 Filed: 08/21/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:135
### §7111. Authorization of appropriations

#### (a) In general

There are authorized to be appropriated for each fiscal year such sums as are necessary to carry out this chapter.

#### (b) Administrative expenses

Funds appropriated under subsection (a) shall not be available for payment of the expenses or expenditures of the Board in administering any provision of any order issued under this chapter.

(Pub. L. 103–407, §12, Oct. 22, 1994, 108 Stat. 4226.)
# Sheet1

X0A0T

X0A1T

X0A2T

X0A3T

X0A4T

X0A5T

X0A6T

X0A7T

X0A8T

X0A9T

X0A10T

X0A11T

X0A12T

X0A13T

X0A14T

X0A15T

X0A16T

X0A17T

X0A18T

X0A19T

X0A20T

X0A21T

X0A22T

X0A23T

X0A24T

X0A25T

X0A26T

X0A27T

X0A28T

X0A29T

X0A30T

X0A31T

X0A32T

X0A33T

X0A34T

X0A35T

X0A0T

X0A1T

X0A2T

X0A3T

X0A4T

X0A5T

X0A6T

X0A7T

X0A8T

X0A9T

X0A10T

X0A11T

X0A12T

X0A13T

X0A14T

X0A15T

X0A16T

X0A17T

X0A18T

X0A19T

X0A20T

X0A21T

X0A22T

X0A23T

X0A24T

X0A25T

X0A26T

X0A27T

X0A28T

X0A29T

X0A30T

X0A31T
### §1636i. Termination of authority

The authority provided by this subchapter terminates on September 30, 2024.

(Aug. 14, 1946, ch. 966, title II, §260, as added Pub. L. 109–296, §1(a), Oct. 5, 2006, 120 Stat. 1464; amended Pub. L. 111–239, §2(a)(1), Sept. 27, 2010, 124 Stat. 2501; Pub. L. 114–54, title I, §101(a), Sept. 30, 2015, 129 Stat. 513; Pub. L. 117–103, div. O, title III, §301(a), Mar. 15, 2022, 136 Stat. 788; Pub. L. 117–328, div. A, title VII, §776(a), Dec. 29, 2022, 136 Stat. 4509; Pub. L. 118–42, div. B, title VII, §793(a), Mar. 9, 2024, 138 Stat. 120.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2024—Pub. L. 118–42 substituted "2024" for "2023".

2022—Pub. L. 117–328 substituted "2023" for "2022".

Pub. L. 117–103 substituted "2022" for "2020".

2015—Pub. L. 114–54 substituted "September 30, 2020" for "September 30, 2015".

2010—Pub. L. 111–239 substituted "September 30, 2015" for "September 30, 2010".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Mandatory Livestock Reporting Extension

Pub. L. 116–260, div. O, title IV, §401, Dec. 27, 2020, 134 Stat. 2149, extended the termination date for authority provided by this subchapter from September 30, 2020, to September 30, 2021.