Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 94 / Monday, May 16, 2011 / Proposed Rules 28195 

Board’s regulations, the Board’s General 

Manager will update the FOIA Fee 

Schedule once every 12 months. 

Previous Fee Schedule Updates were 

published in the Federal Register and 

went into effect, most recently, on July 

12, 2010, 75 FR 39629. The Board’s 

proposed fee schedule is consistent with 

the guidance. The components of the 

proposed fees (hourly charges for search 

and review and charges for copies of 

requested documents) are based upon 

the Board’s specific cost. 

Board Action 

Accordingly, the Board proposes to 

establish the following schedule of 

updated fees for services performed in 

response to FOIA requests: 

DEFENSE NUCLEAR FACILITIES SAFETY BOARD SCHEDULE OF FEES FOR FOIA SERVICES

[Implementing 10 CFR 1703.107(b)(6)] 

Search or Review Charge ........................................................................ $77.00 per hour. 

Copy Charge (paper) ................................................................................ $.12 per page, if done in-house, or generally available commercial rate 

(approximately $.10 per page). 

Electronic Media ....................................................................................... $5.00. 

Copy Charge (audio cassette) ................................................................. $3.00 per cassette. 

Duplication of DVD ................................................................................... $25.00 for each individual DVD; $16.50 for each additional individual 

DVD. 

Copy Charge for large documents (e.g., maps, diagrams) ..................... Actual commercial rates. 

Dated: May 3, 2011. 

Brian Grosner, 

General Manager. 

[FR Doc. 2011–11880 Filed 5–13–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3670–01–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R06–OAR–2006–0502; FRL–9305–5] 

Approval and Promulgation of Air 

Quality Implementation Plans; New 

Mexico; Sunland Park 1-Hour Ozone 

Maintenance Plan 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve 

a revision to the New Mexico State 

Implementation Plan (SIP). The revision 

consists of a maintenance plan for 

Sunland Park, New Mexico developed 

to ensure continued attainment of the 8- 

hour ozone National Ambient Air 

Quality Standard (NAAQS) through the 

year 2014. The Maintenance Plan meets 

the requirements of Section 110(a)(1) of 

the Federal Clean Air Act (CAA), EPA’s 

rules, and is consistent with EPA’s 

guidance. EPA is approving the 

revisions pursuant to section 110 and 

part D of the CAA. 

DATES: Written comments should be 

received on or before June 15, 2011. 

ADDRESSES: Comments may be mailed to 

Mr. Guy Donaldson, Chief, Air Planning 

Section (6PD–L), Environmental 

Protection Agency, 1445 Ross Avenue, 

Suite 1200, Dallas, Texas 75202–2733. 

Comments may also be submitted 

electronically or through hand delivery/ 

courier by following the detailed 

instructions in the ADDRESSES section of 

the direct final rule located in the rules 

section of this Federal Register. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Kenneth W. Boyce, Air Planning Section 

(6PD–L), Environmental Protection 

Agency, Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue, 

Suite 700, Dallas, Texas 75202–2733, 

telephone (214) 665–7259; fax number 

214–665–7263; e-mail address 

boyce.kenneth@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the 

final rules section of this Federal 

Register, EPA is approving the State’s 

SIP submittal as a direct final rule 

without prior proposal because the 

Agency views this as a noncontroversial 

submittal and anticipates no adverse 

comments. A detailed rationale for the 

approval is set forth in the direct final 

rule. If no adverse comments are 

received in response to this action rule, 

no further activity is contemplated. If 

EPA receives adverse comments, the 

direct final rule will be withdrawn and 

all public comments received will be 

addressed in a subsequent final rule 

based on this proposed rule. EPA will 

not institute a second comment period. 

Any parties interested in commenting 

on this action should do so at this time. 

Please note that if EPA receives adverse 

comment on an amendment, paragraph, 

or section of this rule and if that 

provision may be severed from the 

remainder of the rule, EPA may adopt 

as final those provisions of the rule that 

are not the subject of an adverse 

comment. 

For additional information, see the 

direct final rule which is located in the 

rules section of this Federal Register. 

Dated: May 6, 2011. 

Al Armendariz, 

Regional Administrator, Region 6. 

[FR Doc. 2011–11811 Filed 5–13–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES 

Centers for Medicare & Medicaid 

Services 

42 CFR Part 418 

[CMS–1355–P] 

RIN 0938–AQ31 

Medicare Program; Hospice Wage 

Index for Fiscal Year 2012 

Correction 

In proposed rule document 2011– 

10689 appearing on pages 26805–26851 

the issue of Monday, May 9, 2011 make 

the following corrections: 

On page 26806, in the first column, in 

the DATES section, in the fifth line, ‘‘July 

8, 2011’’ should read ‘‘June 27, 2011’’. 

On page 26851, immediately 

following the text of Addendum A, 

insert the following Addendum: 

ADDENDUM B—FY 2012 WAGE INDEX

FOR RURAL AREAS

CBSA 

code Nonurban area Wage index 

1 .......... Alabama .......................... 0.8000 

2 .......... Alaska ............................. 1.3073 

3 .......... Arizona ............................ 0.9417 

4 .......... Arkansas ......................... 0.8000 

5 .......... California ......................... 1.2483 

6 .......... Colorado .......................... 1.0285 

7 .......... Connecticut ..................... 1.1522 

8 .......... Delaware ......................... 1.0103 

9 .......... District of Columbia 1.

10 ........ Florida ............................. 0.8707 

11 ........ Georgia ........................... 0.8000 

12 ........ Hawaii ............................. 1.1586 

13 ........ Idaho ............................... 0.8000 

14 ........ Illinois .............................. 0.8639 

15 ........ Indiana ............................ 0.8688 

16 ........ Iowa ................................. 0.8848 

17 ........ Kansas ............................ 0.8264 

18 ........ Kentucky ......................... 0.8107 


erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
28196 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 94 / Monday, May 16, 2011 / Proposed Rules 

1 Data based on Centers for Medicare & Medicaid 

Services (CMS) Enrollment Database, Provider 

Enrollment, Economic and Attributes Report, 

provided by CMS Office of Research, Development 

and Information, July 2010. 

2CMS FFY 2007 MSIS Data; Medicare Payment 

Advisory Commission, Aligning Incentives (June 

2010), Coordinating the Care of Dual-Eligible 

Beneficiaries, Chapter 5, 133. 

ADDENDUM B—FY 2012 WAGE INDEX

FOR RURAL AREAS—Continued 

CBSA 

code Nonurban area Wage index 

19 ........ Louisiana ......................... 0.8000 

20 ........ Maine .............................. 0.8892 

21 ........ Maryland ......................... 0.9500 

22 ........ Massachusetts 2 .............. 1.2186 

23 ........ Michigan .......................... 0.8858 

24 ........ Minnesota ........................ 0.9358 

25 ........ Mississippi ....................... 0.8000 

26 ........ Missouri ........................... 0.8000 

27 ........ Montana .......................... 0.8819 

28 ........ Nebraska ......................... 0.9227 

29 ........ Nevada ............................ 0.9681 

30 ........ New Hampshire .............. 1.0569 

31 ........ New Jersey1 .................... ............

32 ........ New Mexico .................... 0.9227 

33 ........ New York ........................ 0.8475 

34 ........ North Carolina ................. 0.8655 

35 ........ North Dakota ................... 0.7856 

36 ........ Ohio ................................. 0.8864 

37 ........ Oklahoma ........................ 0.8139 

38 ........ Oregon ............................ 1.0384 

39 ........ Pennsylvania ................... 0.8781 

40 ........ Puerto Rico3 .................... 0.4654 

41 ........ Rhode Island 1 ................. ............

42 ........ South Carolina ................ 0.8711 

43 ........ South Dakota .................. 0.8838 

44 ........ Tennessee ...................... 0.8165 

45 ........ Texas .............................. 0.8083 

46 ........ Utah ................................. 0.8955 

47 ........ Vermont ........................... 0.9931 

48 ........ Virgin Islands .................. 0.8276 

49 ........ Virginia ............................ 0.8119 

50 ........ Washington ..................... 1.0545 

51 ........ West Virginia ................... 0.8000 

52 ........ Wisconsin ........................ 0.9512 

53 ........ Wyoming ......................... 0.9866 

65 ........ Guam .............................. 0.9952 

1There are no rural areas in this State or 

District. 2There are no hospitals in the rural areas of 

Massachusetts, so the wage index value used 

is the average of the contiguous Counties. 3Wage index values are obtained using the 

methodology described in this proposed rule. 

[FR Doc. C1–2011–10689 Filed 5–13–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D 

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES 

Centers for Medicare & Medicaid 

Services 

42 CFR Chapter IV 

[CMS–5507–NC] 

Medicare and Medicaid Programs; 

Opportunities for Alignment Under 

Medicaid and Medicare 

AGENCY: Centers for Medicare & 

Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS. 

ACTION: Request for information. 

SUMMARY: This document is a request for 

comments on opportunities to more 

effectively align benefits and incentives 

to prevent cost-shifting and improve 

access to care under the Medicare and 

Medicaid programs for individuals with 

both Medicare and Medicaid (‘‘dual 

eligibles’’). The document also reflects 

CMS’ commitment to the general 

principles of the President’s Executive 

Order released January 18, 2011, 

entitled ‘‘Improving Regulation and 

Regulatory Review.’’ 

DATES: Comment Date: To be assured 

consideration, comments must be 

received at one of the addresses 

provided below no later than 5 p.m. July 

11, 2011. 

ADDRESSES: In commenting, please refer 

to file code CMS–5507–NC. Because of 

staff and resource limitations, we cannot 

accept comments by facsimile (FAX) 

transmission. 

You may submit comments in one of 

four ways (please choose only one of the 

ways listed): 

1. Electronically. You may submit 

electronic comments on this 

documentto http://www.regulations.gov. 

Follow ‘‘Submit a comment’’ 

instructions. 

2. By regular mail. You may mail 

written comments to the following 

address ONLY: Centers for Medicare & 

Medicaid Services, Department of 

Health and Human Services, Attention: 

CMS–5507–NC, P.O. Box 8013, 

Baltimore, MD 21244–8013. 

Please allow sufficient time for mailed 

comments to be received before the 

close of the comment period. 

3. By express or overnight mail. You 

may send written comments to the 

following address ONLY: Centers for 

Medicare & Medicaid Services, 

Department of Health and Human 

Services, 

Attention: CMS–5507–NC, Mail Stop 

C4–26–05, 7500 Security Boulevard, 

Baltimore, MD 21244–1850. 

4. By hand or courier. Alternatively, 

you may deliver (by hand or courier) 

your written comments ONLY to one of 

the following addresses prior to the 

close of the comment period: 

a. For delivery in Washington, DC— 

Centers for Medicare & Medicaid 

Services, Department of Health and 

Human Services, Room 445–G, Hubert 

H. Humphrey Building, 200 

Independence Avenue, SW., 

Washington, DC 20201. 

(Because access to the interior of the 

Hubert H. Humphrey Building is not 

readily available to persons without 

Federal Government identification, 

commenters are encouraged to leave 

their comments in the CMS drop slots 

located in the main lobby of the 

building. A stamp-in clock is available 

for persons wishing to retain a proof of 

filing by stamping in and retaining an 

extra copy of the comments being filed.) 

b. For delivery in Baltimore, MD— 

Centers for Medicare & Medicaid 

Services, Department of Health and 

Human Services, 7500 Security 

Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21244–1850. 

If you intend to deliver your 

comments to the Baltimore address, call 

telephone number (410) 786–7195 in 

advance to schedule your arrival with 

one of our staff members. 

Comments erroneously mailed to the 

addresses indicated as appropriate for 

hand or courier delivery may be delayed 

and received after the comment period. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Edo 

Banach, Division of Program Alignment, 

Federal Coordinated Health Care Office, 

at (410) 786–8911 or 

Edo.Banach@cms.hhs.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Inspection of Public Comments: All 

comments received before the close of 

the comment period are available for 

viewing by the public, including any 

personally identifiable or confidential 

business information that is included in 

a comment. We post all comments 

received before the close of the 

comment period on the following Web 

site as soon as possible after they have 

been received: http:// 

www.regulations.gov. Follow the search 

instructions on that Web site to view 

public comments [insert instructions 

link]. 

Comments received timely will also 

be available for public inspection as 

they are received, generally beginning 

approximately 3 weeks after publication 

of a document, at the headquarters of 

the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid 

Services, 7500 Security Boulevard, 

Baltimore, Maryland 21244, Monday 

through Friday of each week from 

8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m. To schedule an 

appointment to view public comments, 

phone 1–800–743–3951. 

I. Background 

The Medicare and Medicaid programs 

generally cover different populations, 

but an estimated 9.2 million low-income 

Americans were eligible for both 

programs in 2008.1 Two-thirds of dual 

eligible beneficiaries are over age 65, 

while one-third qualify through a 

disability.2 Dual eligible beneficiaries 

represent some of the most chronically 


erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS-1