alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 21 - SUBSIDIARIES OF PROVIDENT

The following table sets forth all of Provident's  active  subsidiaries
as of the date of this report.

                                                            State of
                                                          Jurisdiction
                                            % of Voting  Under the Laws
                                             Securities     of which
                                               Owned        Organized
                                               -----        ---------

The Provident Bank                               100           Ohio
 Provident Commercial Group, Inc.                100           Ohio
  Provident Auto Leasing Company                 100         Delaware
  Provident Auto Rental Corp. 1998-1             100         Delaware
  Provident Auto Rental Corp. 1998-2             100         Delaware
  Provident Auto Rental LLC 1999-1               100         Delaware
  Provident Auto Rental Company LLC (1999-PRU)   100         Delaware
 Provident Securities and Investment Company     100           Ohio
  Provident Insurance Agency, Inc.               100           Ohio
 Information Leasing Corporation                 100           Ohio
  Provident Lease Receivables Corporation        100         Delaware
 Procurement Alternatives Corporation            100           Ohio
 Capstone Realty Advisors LLC                    100           Ohio
 PB Realty, Inc.                                 100           Ohio
FGBI Acquisition Corporation                     100         Florida
 Provident Bank of Florida                       100         Florida
Provident Investment Advisers, Inc.              100           Ohio
Provident Capital Trust I                        100         Delaware
Provident Capital Trust II                       100         Delaware
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 32


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Emerson Radio Corp. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2005, filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission, Geoffrey P. Jurick, Chief Executive Officer, and Guy A.
Paglinco, Chief Financial Officer, of the Company each hereby certifies pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates
presented and the consolidated result of operations of the Company for the
periods presented.


Dated: February 14, 2006

                                    By: /s/ Geoffrey P. Jurick
                                        ----------------------
                                    Geoffrey P. Jurick
                                    Chief Executive Officer


                                    By: /s/ Guy A. Paglinco
                                        -------------------
                                    Vice President and
                                    Chief Financial Officer


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter
63 of Title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form
10-Q or as a separate disclosure document.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Emerson Radio Corp. and will be
retained by Emerson Radio Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.


                                       43
### §3361. Definition

For the purposes of this subchapter, the term "eligible institution" means an institution of higher education (as defined in section 1001(a) of title 20) in an insular area that has demonstrable capacity to carry out teaching and extension programs in the food and agricultural sciences.

(Pub. L. 95–113, title XIV, §1489, as added Pub. L. 107–171, title VII, §7503, May 13, 2002, 116 Stat. 464.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Resident Instruction and Distance Education at Institutions of Higher Education in United States Insular Areas

Pub. L. 107–171, title VII, §7501(a), May 13, 2002, 116 Stat. 463, provided that: "It is the purpose of this subtitle [subtitle E (§7501–7506) of title VII of Pub. L. 107–171, enacting this subchapter and sections 7631 and 7719 of this title, amending sections 3103, 7715, and 7772 of this title, and enacting provisions set out as a note under section 3103 of this title] to promote and strengthen higher education in the food and agricultural sciences at institutions of higher education (as defined in section 101(a) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1001(a))) that have demonstrable capacity to carry out teaching and extension programs in food and agricultural sciences and that are located in the insular areas of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands of the United States, Guam, American Samoa, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, the Federated States of Micronesia, the Republic of the Marshall Islands, or the Republic of Palau by formulating and administering programs to enhance teaching programs in agriculture, natural resources, forestry, veterinary medicine, home economics, and disciplines closely allied to the food and agriculture production and delivery systems."
#### § 552.78 “Show cause” hearing.

Before suspending the solicitation privilege, the company and the agent will have a chance to show cause why the action should not be taken. “Show cause” is an opportunity for the company, the agent, or both to present facts informally on their behalf. The company and agent will be notified, by letter, far in advance of the pending hearing. If unable to notify the agent directly or indirectly of the hearing, then the hearing may proceed.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of
the undersigned officer of TeraForce Technology Corporation (the Company),
does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that: The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 (the
Form 10-K) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the
information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as
of, and for, the periods presented in the Form 10-K. March
30, 2004
    
    /s/ Herman M. FrietschHerman M. FrietschChief Executive OfficerMarch
30, 2004
    
    /s/ Robert P. CappsRobert P. CappsChief Financial Officer
 A signed original of this written statement required by section 906 has been
provided to TeraForce Technology Corporation and will be retained by TeraForce
Technology Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request. The
 foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form 10-K
pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63
of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as part
of the Form 10-K for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, and is not incorporated by reference into any filings of the
Company, whether made
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED July 7, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-60668 Summary Calendar

USMAN MALIK MANSOOR Petitioner

v. ALBERTO R GONZALES, US ATTORNEY GENERAL Respondent

-------------------- Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals BIA No. A95 319 915

-------------------- Before KING, WIENER and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Usman Malik Mansoor petitions for review of a May 11, 2005, order of the Board of Immigration Appeals denying his motion to reopen. On July 8, 2005, Mansoor filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas a 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition seeking to enjoin his removal. The district court transferred the action to this court under the authority of the Real ID Act. See Real ID Act of 2005, Pub. L. 109-13, 119 Stat. 231, 302-11 (May 11, 2005). The Real ID Act instructs district courts to transfer to the appropriate courts of appealsNo. 05-60668 -2- all § 2241 petitions challenging final orders of removal, deportation, or exclusion “pending in a district court on the date of the enactment of the Act,” May 11, 2005. 119 Stat. 231, 311. Because Mansoor’s § 2241 petition was not pending in the district court on May 11, 2005, the district court’s transfer of the case to this court under the REAL ID Act was improper. We lack jurisdiction over the petition for review because it was not filed within 30 days of the BIA’s order denying Mansoor’s motion to reopen. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(1). Consequently, Mansoor’s petition for review is DISMISSED FOR WANT OF
JURISDICTION.
EXHIBIT 32.1 –
SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS





I,  Vladimir
Fabert, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report
of  Ovale Group, Inc.  on Form10-Q for the period ended
March 31, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in
the Report  fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of  Ovale Group, Inc. as of the
dates and for the periods referred to in the Report.




Date:  June 2,
2008


/s/
Vladimir Fabert Chief Executive Officer
Comment Info: =================

General Comment:Please find attached AirTran Airways' Reply and Response
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6540
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus WALTER LEE SADLER, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Richard L. Voorhees, Chief District Judge. (CR-95-134-V) Submitted: June 12, 1997 Decided: June 18, 1997 Before WIDENER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Walter Lee Sadler, Appellant Pro Se. Brian Lee Whisler, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Walter Lee Sadler appeals from the district court's denial ofhis "Motion for Discovery of Grand Jury Minutes." Our review reveals that Sadler previously moved for production of this same material, and that this court affirmed the district court's denial of that prior motion. United States v. Sadler , Nos. 96-7126, 96- 7674 (4th Cir. Jan. 23, 1997) (unpublished). We again find no error in the district court's denial of relief. We therefore affirm the district court's order. We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
**UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION**

TO:JoAnn Ryan, Executive Officer

Brenda Long, Administrative Officer

Office of the Secretary

FROM:Under Secretary

SUBJECT: Delegation of Authority to Certify Fund Availability

I.DELEGATION

Under the authority vested in me by a delegation to all Principal Officers from the Chief Financial Officer, EL/GEN/1, certified on December 3, 1998, I hereby delegate to you, and to anyone serving for you in an acting capacity, the authority to certify funds available for administering the functions and responsibilities of the Office of the Under Secretary.  This authority is issued pursuant to Title 31 of the U.S. Code, which governs the money and finances of the Department.

Unless otherwise noted in future delegations of authority, amendments to the authority delegated herein are included in the scope of this delegation.

II.RESERVATIONS:  None.

III. REDELEGATION

This authority may not be redelegated

IV.CERTIFICATION AND EFFECTIVE DATE

This delegation is effective upon certification by the Department's Principal Delegations Control Officer and supersedes all previous delegation of this authority.  I hereby ratify actions within the scope of this delegation taken by you prior to the date of certification.

__________/s/___________ 

        David Dunn, Acting

OGC Clearance and Date:  /s/ David Berthiaume, 4/13/2006

Certified Date:  4/25/2006

Departmental Delegations Control Officer:  /s/ Naty G. Beetle

Control Number:  EE/EA1/157
§ 89.6 Procedures. DoD implements policy in this part by: ( a ) Establishing a committee within DoDEA (referred to in this part as the “DoDEA Committee”).
( b ) Designating military representatives by position to serve as liaisons to the State Councils of the member States and the DoDEA Committee in accordance with procedures in § 89.7.
( c ) Designating the ex-officio member to serve as a liaison to MIC3 in accordance with § 89.5 and § 89.7.
( d ) Ensuring DoDEA compliance with the selected provisions of the Compact described in § 89.8.
MEMORANDUM

TO: Assistant Secretary, Office of Finance and Operations

FROM: The Deputy Secretary

SUBJECT: Redelegation of Authority 

I. DELEGATION

Pursuant to OMB-issued Memorandums M-12-12, “Promoting Efficient Spending to 

Support Agency Operations,” and M-17-08 “Amending OMB Memorandum M-12-12, 

Promoting Efficient Spending to Support Agency Operations”, I delegate to you the 

authority to approve Department-sponsored conferences that will have an estimated total 

cost over $100,000. 

Unless otherwise noted in future delegations of authority, amendments to the authority 

delegated herein are included within the scope of this delegation.

II. RESERVATIONS

For conferences over $500,000, your approval shall be subject to review by the Deputy 

Secretary. 

III. REDELEGATION

This authority may not be redelegated.

IV. CERTIFICATION AND EFFECTIVE DATE

This delegation is effective upon certification by the Departmental Delegations Control 

Officer and it supersedes delegation EB/EM/408, dated May 25, 2016.

___________/s_____________

Deputy Secretary

OGC Clearance Date: Tracey Sasser; 10/14/2020

Date Certified: 10/26/2020

Control Number: EA/EK/215
Departmental Delegations Control Officer: Jim Clemmens
Exhibit 32.1

** **

** **

**Certification of CEO andCFO**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350,**

**AsAdopted Pursuant to**

**Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

 

 

In connection with theAnnual Report on Form 10-K of Angeles Partners X (the "Partnership"), for thefiscal year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Steven D. Cordes, as theequivalent of the chief executive officer of the Partnership, and Stephen B.Waters, as the equivalent of the chief financial officer of the Partnership,each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of hisknowledge:

 

(1)   The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)   Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

 

 

This certification isfurnished with this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Partnership for purposes of Section 18of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
#### Ceffie West, Respondent, v. George Gibson et al., Appellants.

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. (Appeals from judgment of Niagara Trial Term for plaintiff and against both defendants in an automobile negligence action.) Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Goldman, McClusky and Henry, JJ.
EXHIBIT 32.2



               Certification of Periodic Financial Report by
         Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



I, George R. Kirkland, Senior Vice-President and Treasurer of Southwest
Georgia Financial Corporation certify that:

  (1)  The Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the annual period
       ended December 31, 2010 (the "Report") fully complies with the
       requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
       Act of 1934; and

  (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly present, in all material
       respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
       Corporation.



                                 By:   /s/George R. Kirkland
                                       George R. Kirkland
                                       Senior Vice-President and Treasurer
                                       (Chief Financial Officer)
                                       Southwest Georgia Financial Corporation
March 31, 2011
# CITY OF 

# HousToN

June 20, 2012

Ms. Renee Wright Docket Operations Program Manager U.S. Department ofTransportation Room W12-140 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. Washington D.C. 20590

Dear Ms. Wright: 

### Aviation Department**•:~** I f, 

### IJ: 

# 20 Annise D. Parker Mayor
Mario C. Diaz Director of Aviation P.O. Box 60106 Houston, Texas 77205-0106 T. 281-233-1877 F. 281-233-1864 www.houstontx.gov

On behalf ofthe Houston Airport System I wantto express oursupportforthe proposal of Sun Air Express, LL<; cJ/9/C!Sun**Air!nt~m<!~iong~l** ("Sun Aix") to provide EssentiC)l Air.Service {"EASII).underthe authority of49 U.S.C. 

### §41731, 

### ets.e..Q.. between Victoria Regional Airport ("VCT") in Victoria, Texas and George Bush Intercontinental Airport ("IAH'') in Houston, Texas.


### As the Department is aware, IAH is one ofthe nation's premier aviation gateways, and Houston greatlyvalues the service to Victoria that has been in place for more than two decades. Houston is concerned aboutthe potential loss of service given that the carrier currently providing EAS flights between VCT and IAH intends to terminate its services on June30, 2012. 

### As a result, we hope thatthe Department can act promptlyto select a replacement carrierto serve the VCT-IAH market. · Houston's primary concern is the continuation of service, and at a level commensur.ate with the market's needs. Given Victoria's notificationto DOT on June 18, 2012 that the Victoria community supportsthe selection of Sun Air, and otherfactors noted below, Houston asks thatthe Department approve Sun Air's proposal; we stand ready to work with Sun Airto ensure prompt commencement ofservice. We understand that Sun Air has entered into interline ticketing and baggage agreements which will help passengers to/from Victoria to benefitfully from the many connecting opportunities available at IAH, as well as forticketagents to make bookings through GDSs; DOT previously has recognized thatthe existence ofsuch agreements is an important decisional factor. Sf.e.._.e,,g,_. Order 2010-9-9, at 3· In addition, the applicable statutory authority {49 U.S.C. 

### § 41733(c)(1))gives special weight to considerations of community support and the existence of interline and baggage agreements. Houston also appreciates that Sun Air's proposal would increase the frequency offlights between VCT and IAH, as well as offera simple/low-cost fare structure. Accordingly, we hope thatthe Department will expeditiously approve Sun Air's application in order to ensure continued air service between Victoria and Houston.
With ourthanks foryour consideration of ourconcerns,

# :~~~**Di::c~r,** City of Houston Department ofAviation
Council Members: Wanda Adams C.O. "Brad" Bradford Helena Brown Andrew C. Burks, Jr. Jack Christie Ellen R. Cohen Stephen C. Costello Jerry Davis Edward Gonzalez Larry V. Green AI Hoang Mike Laster Melissa Noriega Oliver Pennington James G. Rodriguez Mike Sullivan Controller: Ronald C. Green
---

EXHIBIT 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. (the
Company) on Form 20-F for the twelve months ended December 31, 2008 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report).
I, David Wolfin, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of
      section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                   
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                 
| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.



|Date: July 15, 2009 | /s/
      David Wolfin                   
|------------------- | -----------------------------------------
|                    | David Wolfin, Principal Executive Officer

---
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 99(c)

                                 TXU GAS COMPANY

                       Certificate Pursuant to Section 906
                         of Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002

     The undersigned, Scott Longhurst, Principal Financial Officer of TXU Gas
Company (the "Company"), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:

     1.   The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June
          30, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
          section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
          amended; and

     2.   Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
          Company.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this instrument to be
executed this 14th day of August, 2002.

                                                    /s/ Scott Longhurst
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Name:   Scott Longhurst
                                             Title:  Principal Financial Officer