alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 232.12 Effective dates. ( a ) *In general.* This regulation shall take effect October 1, 2015, except that, other than as provided in this section and in § 232.13(b)(1), nothing in this part shall apply to consumer credit that is extended to a covered borrower and consummated before October 3, 2016.
( b ) *Prior extensions of consumer credit.* Consumer credit that is extended to a covered borrower and consummated any time between October 1, 2007, and October 3, 2016, is subject to the definitions, conditions, and requirements of this part as were established by the Department and effective on October 1, 2007.
( c ) *New extensions of consumer credit.* Except as provided in paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section with respect to extensions of consumer credit under paragraph (b) of this section (and except as permitted by § 232.13(b)(1)), the requirements of this part that are effective as of October 1, 2015, shall apply only to a consumer credit transaction or account for consumer credit consummated or established on or after October 3, 2016.
( d ) *Provisions of 10 U.S.C. 987(d)(2) .* The amendments to 10 U.S.C. 987(d)(2) enacted in section 661(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Pub. L. 112-239, 126 Stat. 1785), as reflected in § 232.7(b), took effect on January 2, 2014.
( e ) *Civil liability remedies.* The provisions set forth in § 232.9(e) shall apply with respect to consumer credit extended on or after January 2, 2013.
#### 1323.506 Suspension of payments, termination of contract and debarment and suspension actions.

The designee authorized to waive a determination to suspend contract payments, terminate a contract for default, or debar or suspend a contractor for Drug-Free Workplace violations, is set forth in CAM 1301.70. This authority may not be delegated.
<PAGE>
Exhibit 3(a)-3

Articles of Amendment-Domestic Business Corporation
DSCB:15-1915 (Rev. 91)

	In compliance with the requirements of 15 Pa.C.S. 
Section 1915 (related to articles of amendment), the undersigned 
business corporation, desiring to amend its Articles, hereby 
states that:

1.	The name of the corporation is:  Pennsylvania Power & Light 
Company.

2.	The (a) address of this corporation's current registered 
office in this Commonwealth or (b) name of its commercial 
registered office provider and the county of venue is (the 
Department is hereby authorized to correct the following 
information to conform to the records of the Department):

	(a)  Two North Ninth Street, Allentown, PA  18101     Lehigh
	     Number and Street        City    State  Zip      County

	(b)  c/o: __________________________________________________
	          Name of Commercial Registered Office 
	          Provider                                    County

For a corporation represented by a commercial registered office 
provider, the county in (b) shall be deemed the county in which 
the corporation is located for venue and official publication 
purposes.

3.	The statute by or under which it was incorporated is:  PA 
Business Corporation Law of 1988

4.	The date of its Incorporation is:  June 4, 1920

5.	(Check, and if appropriate complete, one of the following):

_X_  The amendment shall be effective upon filing these Articles 
of Amendment in the Department of State.

___  The amendment shall be effective on:  _____________(date) at 
________________(hour).

6.	(Check one of the following):
___	The amendment was adopted by the shareholders (or members) 
pursuant to 15 Pa.C.S. Section 1914(a) and (b).

_X_  The amendment was adopted by the board of directors pursuant 
to 15 Pa. C.S. Section 1914 (c).

7.	(Check, and if appropriate complete, one of the following):

_X_	The amendment adopted by the corporation, set forth in full, 
is as follows:
	     "The name of the corporation is PP&L, Inc."

___	The amendment adopted by the corporation is set forth in 
full in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof.

8.	(Check if the amendment restates the Articles):

___	The restated Articles of Incorporation supersede the 
original Articles and all amendments thereto.


	IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the undersigned corporation has 
caused these Articles of Amendment to be signed by a duly 
authorized officer thereof this 12th day of September, 1997.



                            Pennsylvania Power & Light Company
                                 (Name of Corporation)

                            BY: /s/ Robert J. Grey
                            Robert J. Grey   (Signature)

                            TITLE: Senior Vice President, General
                                   Counsel and Secretary


Microfilm Number  9768-838 and 9768-839
Entity Number     273941

Filed with the Department of State on September 12, 1997
/s/ ________________________________
     Secretary of the Commonwealth
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 5.0.3

Eastern Division

Innovatio IP Ventures, LLC, Patent Litigation,

et al.

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:11−cv−09308

Honorable James F.

Holderman

JW Marriott Chicago, et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Friday, October 19, 2012:

 MINUTE entry before Honorable Sidney I. Schenkier:Magistrate Judge Status

hearing held on 10/19/2012 and continued to 12/4/2012 at 02:30 p.m. Detailed Order to

follow.Mailed notice(lxs, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:11-cv-09308 Document #: 453 Filed: 10/19/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:16213
1315.204-570 Part IV representations and instructions. ( a ) *Section L, Instructions, conditions, and notices to offerors or respondents.* ( 1 ) The contracting officer shall insert the provision 1352.215-70, *Proposal Preparation,* in all solicitations. Contracting officers should tailor the provision to best meet the Government's needs. Information requested from offerors in Volume II-Technical Proposal, must correspond to the evaluation factors. Contracting officers should not request information that will not be evaluated in accord with the stated technical evaluation factors. Should electronic submission be allowed by the CO, specific instructions must be added.
( 2 ) Insert a provision similar to 1352.215-71, *Instructions for Oral Presentations,* in solicitations when oral presentations will be used. Contracting officers shall tailor the provision to suit their acquisition.
( 3 ) The contracting officer shall insert the provision 1352.215-72, *Inquiries,* in solicitations as determined by the CO. This provision may be modified to satisfy the needs of specific procurements.
( b ) *Section M, Evaluation factors for award.* ( 1 ) The contracting officer shall insert provision 1352.215-73, *Evaluation Quantities-Indefinite Quantity Contract,* in solicitations for indefinite quantity and requirements contracts, as appropriate. This provision may be modified to satisfy the needs of specific procurements.
( 2 ) The contracting officer shall insert the provision similar to 1352.215-74, *Best Value Evaluation,* for competitive, best value procurements, tailoring the language as appropriate. If clause 1352.215-74, *Best Value Evaluation,* is used, then clause 1352.215-75 *Evaluation Criteria,* must be used.
( 3 ) The contracting officer shall insert a provision in all solicitations similar to 1352.215-75, *Evaluation Criteria,* to specify evaluation criteria, tailoring the language as appropriate. If the basis for award is lowest price technically acceptable, this must be stated.
( 4 ) The contracting officer shall insert provision 1352.215-76, *Cost or Pricing Data,* in all solicitations when cost or pricing data is required under FAR subpart 15.4.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT
WILLIAM M. USCHOCK AND DAVID USCHOCK, CO-EXECUTORS OF THE IRENE G. USCHOCK ESTATE, Petitioners

v.
KRIEBEL GAS COMPANY AND RANGE RESOURCES - APPALACHIA, LLC, Respondent : : : : : : : : : : : : : : No. 429 WAL 2014 Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER
PER CURIAM AND NOW , this 23rd day of December, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED

.
#### National Surety Corporation v. Robert R. Kaufman.

Motion to dismiss appeal granted, with $10 costs, unless the appellant procures the record on appeal and appellant’s points to be served and filed on or before August 9, 1960, with notice of argument for the September 1960 Term of this court, said appeal to be argued or submitted when reached. Concur - — Botein, P. J., Breitel, McNally, Stevens and Noonan, JJ.
Case: 1:11-cv-09114 Document #: 11 Filed: 05/30/12 Page 1 of 17 PageID #:32

Case: 1:11-cv-09114 Document #: 11 Filed: 05/30/12 Page 2 of 17 PageID #:33

Case: 1:11-cv-09114 Document #: 11 Filed: 05/30/12 Page 3 of 17 PageID #:34

Case: 1:11-cv-09114 Document #: 11 Filed: 05/30/12 Page 4 of 17 PageID #:35

Case: 1:11-cv-09114 Document #: 11 Filed: 05/30/12 Page 5 of 17 PageID #:36

Case: 1:11-cv-09114 Document #: 11 Filed: 05/30/12 Page 6 of 17 PageID #:37

Case: 1:11-cv-09114 Document #: 11 Filed: 05/30/12 Page 7 of 17 PageID #:38

Case: 1:11-cv-09114 Document #: 11 Filed: 05/30/12 Page 8 of 17 PageID #:39

Case: 1:11-cv-09114 Document #: 11 Filed: 05/30/12 Page 9 of 17 PageID #:40

Case: 1:11-cv-09114 Document #: 11 Filed: 05/30/12 Page 10 of 17 PageID #:41

Case: 1:11-cv-09114 Document #: 11 Filed: 05/30/12 Page 11 of 17 PageID #:42

Case: 1:11-cv-09114 Document #: 11 Filed: 05/30/12 Page 12 of 17 PageID #:43

Case: 1:11-cv-09114 Document #: 11 Filed: 05/30/12 Page 13 of 17 PageID #:44

Case: 1:11-cv-09114 Document #: 11 Filed: 05/30/12 Page 14 of 17 PageID #:45

Case: 1:11-cv-09114 Document #: 11 Filed: 05/30/12 Page 15 of 17 PageID #:46

Case: 1:11-cv-09114 Document #: 11 Filed: 05/30/12 Page 16 of 17 PageID #:47

Case: 1:11-cv-09114 Document #: 11 Filed: 05/30/12 Page 17 of 17 PageID #:48
Exhibit 12(a)
                   ELIZABETHTOWN WATER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARY
                Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
                           (In Thousands Except Ratios)


                                           Three Months Ended  Nine Months Ended
                                                 September 30,   September 30,
                                                 1999    1998     1999     1998
EARNINGS:

Net income                                     $ 7,880 $ 8,689  $18,506 $19,021
Federal income taxes                             4,201   4,633    9,831  10,106
Interest charges                                 4,021   3,797   11,882  11,511
                                               ---------------------------------
 Earnings available to cover fixed charges      16,102  17,119   40,219  40,638
                                               ---------------------------------

FIXED CHARGES:
Interest on long-term debt                       3,507   3,651   10,959  10,988
Other interest                                     490     229      868     627
Amortization of debt discount - net                 99      98      295     293
                                               ---------------------------------
Total fixed charges                            $ 4,096 $ 3,978  $12,122 $11,908
                                               ---------------------------------

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges                3.93    4.30     3.32    3.41
                                               =================================





Earnings to Fixed Charges represents the sum of Net Income,
Dividends, Federal income taxes and Interest Charges (which is reduced by
Allowance for Debt Funds Used During Construction), divided by Fixed Charges.
Fixed Charges consist of interest on long and short-term debt (which is not
reduced by Allowance for Debt Funds Used During Construction), and
Amortization of debt discount.
§ 935.97 Garnishment. ( a ) If a judgment debtor fails to satisfy a judgment in full within 60 days after the entry of judgment (or such other period as the Court may prescribe), the Court may, upon the application of the judgment creditor issue a writ of garnishment directed to any person having money or property in his possession belonging to the judgment debtor or owing money to the judgment debtor. The following are exempt from judgment: ( 1 ) Ninety percent of so much of the gross wages as does not exceed $200 due to the judgment debtor from his employer.
( 2 ) Eighty percent of so much of the gross wages as exceeds $200 but does not exceed $500 due to the judgment debtor from his employer.
( 3 ) Fifty percent of so much of the gross wages as exceeds $500 due to the judgment debtor from his employer.
( b ) The writ of garnishment shall be served on the judgment debtor and the garnishee and shall direct the garnishee to pay or deliver from the money or property owing to the judgment debtor such money or property as the Court may prescribe.
( c ) The garnished amount shall be paid to the Clerk of the Court, who shall apply it as follows: ( 1 ) First, to satisfy the costs of garnishment and court costs.
( 2 ) Second, to satisfy the judgment.
( 3 ) Third, the residue (if any) to the judgment debtor.
( d ) Funds of the debtor held by the United States are not subject to garnishment.
### §214. Effective date of orders

Except as otherwise provided in this chapter all orders of the Secretary under this subchapter, other than orders for the payment of money, shall take effect within such reasonable time, not less than five days, as is prescribed in the order, and shall continue in force until his further order, or for a specified period of time, according as is prescribed in the order, unless such order is suspended or modified or set aside by the Secretary or is suspended or set aside by a court of competent jurisdiction.

(Aug. 15, 1921, ch. 64, title III, §313, 42 Stat. 167.)
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 15.2

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements of
Elron Electronic Industries Ltd. on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-10570, 333-111310)
of our report dated March 12, 2003, except as to note 7(d)7 which is dated March
10, 2004, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Elron
Electronic Industries Ltd. included in this Annual Report (Form 20-F) for the
year ended December 31, 2003.


Tel-Aviv, Israel                        /s/ Luboshitz Kasierer
June 22, 2004                           An affiliate member of Ernst & Young
                                        International
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 17, 2021

No. 04-21-00260-CR

Norberto ADAME,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 111th Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019CRB000094D2

Honorable Monica Z. Notzon, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

On July 26, 2021, appellant Norberto Adame filed a motion for a free reporter’s record. 

He states in his motion that he is unable to pay for or give security for the reporter’s record, and 

he requests an evidentiary hearing to provide proof of inability to pay or give security. On 

August 13, 2021, the trial court reporter filed a volume of the reporter’s record and a notification 

of late record. The reporter’s record shows that the trial court set a hearing on the issue of 

appellant’s indigency for September 1, 2021. The court reporter’s notification of late record 

states that the trial court has set the matter of appellant’s indigency for a hearing and that the 

reporter’s record can be completed within thirty days after indigency is granted. On August 16, 

2021, we noted the court reporter’s notification of late record and ordered the trial court clerk to 

file a supplemental record containing the trial court’s order and any findings required by Rule 

145(f)(6) to this court not later than September 10, 2021.

On September 16, 2021, the trial court clerk filed a notification of late record, stating that 

the hearing scheduled for September 1, 2021, had been moved to November 2, 2021. 

Accordingly, the trial court clerk’s notification of late record is NOTED. We ORDER the trial 

court clerk to file a supplemental record containing the trial court’s order and any findings 

required by Rule 145(f)(6) to this court not later than November 12, 2021.

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 17th day of September, 2021.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Albert Fenza, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from judgments of the County Court, Kings County, rendered August 2, 1960, convicting him, on his pleas of guilty, of (1) violation of section 974 of the Penal Law (keeping a place for game of policy), and (2) conspiracy to violate section 1372 of the Penal Law (contriving, drawing and assisting in a lottery); and sentencing him on each count to serve a term of six months in the New York City Penitentiary, such terms to run concurrently. The appeal is taken solely on the ground that the sentences are excessive. Judgments affirmed. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Pette, JJ., concur.
#### Vincent M. Gaughan, Respondent-Appellant, v. J. Howard McGrath, Respondent-Appellant. Edward Lamb, Appellant-Respondent, v. Vincent M. Gaughan et al., Respondents-Appellants.

Order unanimously affirmed, without costs of this appeal to any party. (Cross appeals from order of Erie Special Term granting motion by plaintiff Gaughan in the first action and by defendants Gaughan in the second action for a joint trial of the actions, but denying that portion of their motion which asked for consolidation.) Present — Bastow, J. P., Goldman, Halpern, McClusky and Henry, JJ.
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 169 (Wednesday, August 31, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 54287]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-22233]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Notice of Intent To Release Federally-Obligated Airport 
Properties, Tampa International Airport, Tampa, FL

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Request for public comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA hereby provides notice of intent to release certain 
airport properties, 0.026 acres at the Tampa International Airport, 
Tampa, FL, from the conditions, reservations, and restrictions as 
contained in a Quitclaim Deed agreement between the FAA and the City of 
Tampa, dated November 5, 1947. The release of property will allow the 
Hillsborough County Aviation Authority to grant a utility easment to 
the City of Tampa. The property is located on the southwest corner of 
Dale Mabry Highway and Tampa Bay Boulevard in Hillsborough County, 
Florida. The parcel is currently designated as non-aeronautical use. 
The property will be released of its federal obligations for fair 
market value. The fair market value of the parcel has been determined 
by appraisal to be $7,900.
    Documents reflecting the Sponsor's request are available, by 
appointment only, for inspection at the Tampa International Airport and 
the FAA Airports District Office.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 125 of The Wendell H. Ford Aviation 
Investment and Reform Act for the 21st Century (AIR-21) requires the 
FAA to provide an opportunity for public notice and comment prior to 
the ``waiver'' or ``modification'' of a sponsor's Federal obligation to 
use certain airport land for non-aeronautical purposes.

DATES: Comments are due on or before September 30, 2011.

ADDRESSES: Documents are available for review at the Palm Beach 
International Airport, and the FAA Airports District Office, 5950 
Hazeltine National Drive, Suite 400, Orlando, FL 32822. Written 
comments on the Sponsor's request must be delivered or mailed to: 
Rebecca R. Henry, Program Manager, Orlando Airports District Office, 
5950 Hazeltine National Drive, Suite 400, Orlando, FL 32822-5024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rebecca R. Henry, Program Manager, 
Orlando Airports District Office, 5950 Hazeltine National Drive, Suite 
400, Orlando, FL 32822-5024.

W. Dean Stringer,
Manager, Orlando Airports District Office, Southern Region.
[FR Doc. 2011-22233 Filed 8-30-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
<PAGE>


                                  EXHIBIT 99.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of TeraForce Technology Corporation (the
"COMPANY") on Form 10-K for the annual period ended December 31, 2002, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "REPORT"),
I, Robert P. Capps, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/ Robert P. Capps
------------------------------
Robert P. Capps
Chief Financial Officer

Dated: April 15, 2003
**Exhibit 99.1**

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO

SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In condition with the AnnualReport on Form 10-K of Polydex Pharmaceuticals Limited (the “Company”) for theperiod ended January 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, George G. Usher, ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)  the report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

(2)  the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultof operations of the Company.

 

 
| By /s/  George G. Usher |   |
|------------------------------|--------|
| George G. Usher,             |
| Chief Executive Officer      |
| May 16, 2003                 |

 

 

----
#### General Electric Company *v.*J. G. E. Appliance of Stamford, Inc.

*Anthony M. MacLeod,*in support of the motion.

*Robert J. Berta,*in opposition.

Submitted November 22

decided December 10, 1974

The defendant’s motion for a review of the order by the trial court dated November 15,1974, terminating the stay of execution of judgment pending appeal from the Superior Court in Fairfield County is granted and the relief sought therein is denied.
-84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72

34 36 38 40 

### ★
▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 06/17 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 17 Jun 06

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.77 N 77.11 WMeters AGL