### 57945 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 184 / Thursday, September 23, 2010 / Notices

of [S,S]-ethylenediamine disuccinic acid tri-sodium salt (hereafter referred to as EDDS) (CAS No. 178949–82–1) under 40 CFR 180.910 when used in accordance with good agricultural practices as a pesticide inert ingredient in pesticide formulations applied to growing crops or to raw agricultural commodities after harvest. An analytical method has not been proposed because EDDS residues harmful to plants and animals is highly unlikely to occur when it is applied as part of the proposed pesticide formulation and according to that formulation’s label directions for use. Contact: Alganesh Debesai, (703) 308– 8353, e-mail address: debesai.alganesh@epa.gov

. List of Subjects

Environmental protection, Agricultural commodities, Feed additives, Food additives, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

Dated: September 16, 2010. Lois Rossi, Director, Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.
[FR Doc. 2010–23862 Filed 9–22–10; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6560–50–S**

**ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY** 

**[EPA–HQ–OPP–2010–0730; FRL–8844–5]**

**Atonik and Verbenone, Registration Review Proposed Decisions; Notice of**  **Availability**

**AGENCY :**  Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

**ACTION :**  Notice.

**SUMMARY :**  This notice announces the availability of EPA’s proposed registration review decisions for the pesticides listed in the table in Unit II.A. and opens a public comment period on the proposed decisions. Registration review is EPA’s periodic review of pesticide registrations to ensure that each pesticide continues to satisfy the statutory standard for registration, that is, that the pesticide can perform its intended function without unreasonable adverse effects on human health or the environment. Through this program, EPA is ensuring that each pesticide’s registration is based on current scientific and other knowledge, including its effects on human health and the environment.

**DATES :**  Comments must be received on or before November 22, 2010.

**ADDRESSES :**  Submit your comments, identified by the docket identification (ID) number for the specific pesticide of interest provided in the table in Unit II.A. by one of the following methods:

• Federal eRulemaking Portal : http:// www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line instructions for submitting comments.

• Mail : Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP) Regulatory Public Docket (7502P), Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, Washington, DC 20460–0001.

• Delivery : OPP Regulatory Public Docket (7502P), Environmental Protection Agency, Rm. S–4400, One Potomac Yard (South Bldg.), 2777 S. Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. Deliveries are only accepted during the Docket Facility’s normal hours of operation (8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays). Special arrangements should be made for deliveries of boxed information. The Docket Facility telephone number is (703) 305–5805.

Instructions : Direct your comments to the docket identification (ID) number for the specific pesticide of interest provided in the table in Unit II.A. EPA’s policy is that all comments received will be included in the docket withoutchange and may be made available online at http://www.regulations.gov

, including any personal information provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through regulations.gov or e-mail. The regulations.gov website is an

‘‘ anonymous access ’’ system, which means EPA will not know your identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an e-mail comment directly to EPA without going through regulations.gov, your e-mail address will be automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is placed in the docket and made available on the Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses.

Docket : All documents in the docket are listed in the docket index available
at http://www.regulations.gov. Although listed in the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are available either in the electronic docket at http:// www.regulations.gov, or, if only available in hard copy, at the OPP Regulatory Public Docket in Rm. S– 4400, One Potomac Yard (South Bldg.), 2777 S. Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. The hours of operation of this Docket Facility are from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The Docket Facility telephone number is (703) 305–5805.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  For pesticide specific information, contact : The Regulatory Action Leader for the pesticide of interest identified in the table in Unit II.A.

For general information on the registration review program, contact : Kevin Costello, Pesticide Re-evaluation Division (7508P), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460–0001; telephone number: (703) 305–5026; fax number: (703) 308–8090; e-mail address: costello.kevin@epa.gov

. **SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :** 
I. General Information A. Does this Action Apply to Me?

This action is directed to the public in general, and may be of interest to a wide range of stakeholders including environmental, human health, farm worker, and agricultural advocates; the chemical industry; pesticide users; and members of the public interested in the sale, distribution, or use of pesticides. Since others also may be interested, the Agency has not attempted to describe all the specific entities that may be affected by this action. If you have any questions regarding the applicability of this action to a particular entity, consult the chemical review manager listed under

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT**

. B. What Should I Consider as I Prepare My Comments for EPA?

1. Submitting CBI . Do not submit this information to EPA through regulations.gov or e-mail. Clearly mark the part or all of the information that you claim to be CBI. For CBI information in a disk or CD-ROM that you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the disk or CD-ROM as CBI and then identify electronically within the disk or CD-ROM the specific information that is claimed as CBI. In addition to one


### 57946 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 184 / Thursday, September 23, 2010 / Notices

complete version of the comment that includes information claimed as CBI, a copy of the comment that does not contain the information claimed as CBI must be submitted for inclusion in the public docket. Information so marked will not be disclosed except in accordance with procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2.

2. Tips for preparing your comments

. When submitting comments, remember
to:

i. Identify the document by docket ID number and other identifying information (subject heading, Federal Register date and page number).

ii. Follow directions. The Agency may ask you to respond to specific questions or organize comments by referencing a Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) part or section number.

iii. Explain why you agree or disagree; suggest alternatives and substitute language for your requested changes.

iv. Describe any assumptions and provide any technical information and/ or data that you used. v. If you estimate potential costs or burdens, explain how you arrived at your estimate in sufficient detail to allow for it to be reproduced.

vi. Provide specific examples to illustrate your concerns and suggest alternatives.

vii. Explain your views as clearly as possible, avoiding the use of profanity or personal threats.

viii. Make sure to submit your comments by the comment period deadline identified. II. Background A. What Action is the Agency Taking?

Pursuant to 40 CFR 155.58, this notice announces the availability of EPA’s proposed registration review decisions for the pesticides shown in the following table, and opens a 60–day public comment period on the proposed decisions.

Atonik, plant growth regulators(PGRs) consist of three naturallyoccurring nitrophenolates: Sodium 5-nitroguaiacolate, sodium onitrophenolate, and sodium pnitrophenolate. The PGRs in atonik are simple synthetic nitrophenols solubilized in sodium hydroxide. Atonik is intended for use on cotton, rice, and soybean plants.

The verbenone & 4-allyl anisole registration review case contains 2 active seperate ingredients, verbenone and 4-allyl anisole. Verbenone is a terpene that acts as an anti-aggregation pheromone in Dendroctonus and Lps species . Verbenone is used on pine trees in forests to control bark beetles, such as the southern pine beetle Dendroctonus frontalis . 4-allyl anisole is an alkenylbenzene compound that is produced by conifers during bark beetle Dendroctonus sp. infestations. 4-allyl anisole acts as an anti-aggregation agent by signaling the beetles that the tree has already been colonized and therefore is an unsuitable host. There is one manufacturing use product that is registered containing the active ingredient and there are no registered end use products that are being produced, sold, distributed, or used.



### R EGISTRATION 

### R EVIEW 

### P ROPOSED 

### F INAL 

### D ECISIONS

Registration Review Case Name and Number Pesticide Docket ID Number Chemical Review Manager, Telephone Number, E-mail Address

Atonik (6067) EPA–HQ–OPP–2008–0832 Driss Benmhend, (703) 308–9525, benmhend.driss@epa.gov

Verbenone & 4-Allyl Anisole

(6031) EPA–HQ–OPP–2009–0511 Leonard Cole, (703) 305–5412, cole.leonard@epa.gov

The registration review docket for a pesticide includes earlier documents related to the registration review of the case. For example, the review opened with the posting of a Summary Document, containing a Preliminary Work Plan, for public comment. A Final Work Plan was posted to the docket following public comment on the initial docket. The documents in the initial dockets described the Agency’s rationales for not conducting additional risk assessments for the registration review of the pesticides included in the table in Unit II.A. These proposed registration review decisions continue to be supported by those rationales included in documents in the initial dockets.

Following public comment, the Agency will issue final registration review decisions for products containing the pesticides listed in the table in Unit II.A.

The registration review program is being conducted under congressionally mandated time frames, and EPA recognizes the need both to make timely decisions and to involve the public. Section 3(g) of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA), as amended, required EPA to establish by regulation procedures for reviewing pesticide registrations, originally with a goal of reviewing each pesticide’s registration every 15 years to ensure that a pesticide continues to meet the FIFRA standard for registration. The Agency’s final rule to implement this program was issued in August 2006 and became effective in October 2006, and appears at 40 CFR part 155, subpart C. The Pesticide Registration Improvement Act of 2003 (PRIA) was amended and extended in September 2007. FIFRA, as amended by PRIA in 2007, requires EPA to complete registration review decisions by October 1, 2022, for all pesticides registered as of October 1, 2007.

The registration review final rule at 40 CFR 155.58(a) provides for a minimum 60–day public comment period on all proposed registration review decisions. This comment period is intended to provide an opportunity for public input and a mechanism for initiating any necessary amendments to the proposed decision. All comments should be submitted using the methods in

**ADDRESSES** , and must be received by EPA on or before the closing date. These comments will become part of the docket for the pesticides included in the table in Unit II.A. Comments received after the close of the comment period will be marked ‘‘ late. ’’ EPA is not required to consider these late
comments.

The Agency will carefully consider all comments received by the closing date and will provide a ‘‘ Response to Comments Memorandum ’’ in the docket. The final registration review decision will explain the effect that any comments had on the decision and provide the Agency’s response to significant comments.

Background on the registration review program is provided at: http:// www.epa.gov/oppsrrd1/ registration

_ review. Links to earlier documents related to the registration review of these pesticides are provided


### 57947 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 184 / Thursday, September 23, 2010 / Notices

at: http://www.epa.gov/oppsrrd1/ registration

_ review/
reg

_ review

_ status.htm

. B. What is the Agency’s Authority for Taking this Action?

Section 3(g) of FIFRA and 40 CFR part 155, subpart C, provide authority for this action. List of Subjects

Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure, Pesticides and pests.

Dated: September 16, 2010. W. Michael McDavit, Acting Director, Biopesticide and Pollution Prevention Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.

[FR Doc. 2010–23810 Filed 9–22–10; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6560–50–S**

**FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION** 

**Notice of Public Information Collection(s) Being Reviewed by the**  **Federal Communications Commission, Comments Requested** 

September 17, 2010.

**SUMMARY :**  The Federal Communications Commission, as part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork burden invites the general public and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment on the following information collection(s), as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) of 1995, 44 U.S.C. 3501 – 3520. Comments are requested concerning: (a) whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the Commission, including whether the information shall have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the Commission’s burden estimate; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information collected; (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on the respondents, including the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology, and (e) ways to further reduce the information collection burden on small business concerns with fewer than 25 employees.

The FCC may not conduct or sponsor a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid control number. No person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) that does not display a currently valid OMB control number.

**DATES :**  Written Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) comments should be submitted on or before November 22, 2010. If you anticipate that you will be submitting PRA comments, but find it difficult to do so within the period of time allowed by this notice, you should advise the FCC contact listed below as soon as possible.

**ADDRESSES :**  Direct all PRA comments to Nicholas A. Fraser, Office of Management and Budget, via fax at 202– 395–5167 or via the Internet at Nicholas

_ A.

_ Fraser@omb.eop.gov and to the Federal Communications Commission via email to PRA@fcc.gov.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Judith B. Herman, Office of Managing Director, (202) 418–0214. For additional information, contact Judith B. Herman, OMD, 202–418–0214 or email judith– b.herman@fcc.gov.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :** 

OMB Control Number: 3060–1058. Title: FCC Application or Notification for Spectrum Leasing Arrangement: Wireless Telecommunications Bureau and/or Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau.

Form No.: FCC Form 608. Type of Review: Revision of a currently approved collection.

Respondents: Business or other for– profit, not–for–profit institutions, and state, local or tribal government.

Number of Respondents and Responses: 991 respondents; 991
responses.

Estimated Time Per Response: 5 hours.

Frequency of Response: On occasion reporting requirement, recordkeeping requirement.

Obligation to Respond: Required to obtain or retain benefits. Statutory authority for this information collection is contained in 47 U.S.C. sections 151, 154(i), 154(j), 155, 161, 301, 303(r), 308, 309, 310, 332 and 503.

Total Annual Burden: 4,955 hours. Total Annual Cost: $910,400. Privacy Act Impact Assessment: N/A. Nature and Extent of Confidentiality: In general there is no need for confidentiality. On a case–by–case basis, the Commission may be required to withhold from disclosure certain information about the location, character, or ownership of a historic property, including traditional religious sites.

Needs and Uses: The Commission will submit this revised information collection to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) after this comment period to obtain OMB approval. The Commission is reporting a 3,200 hour burden reduction adjustment which is due to 632 fewer respondents.

The revision to the FCC Form 608 is due to rewording of data elements, adding a question inquiring if filing is the lead application on the Main Form, and changing language in the instructions.

FCC Form 608 is a multi–purpose form. It is used to provide notification or request approval for any spectrum leasing arrangement (’Leases’) entered into between an existing licensee (’Licensee’) in certain wireless services and a spectrum lessee (’Lessee’). This form also is required to notify or request approval for any spectrum subleasing arrangement (’Sublease’).

The data collected on the form is used by the FCC to determine whether the public interest would be served by the Lease or Sublease. The form is also used to provide notification for any Private Commons Arrangement entered into between a Licensee, Lessee, or Sublessee and a class of third–party users (as defined in Section 1.9080 of the Commission’s rules).

Federal Communications Commission. Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary, Office of the Secretary, Office of Managing Director.

[FR Doc. 2010–23800 Filed 9–22–10; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6712–01–S**

**FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION** 

**[AU Docket No. 10–147; DA 10–1351]**

**Auction of VHF Commercial Television Station Construction Permits**  **Scheduled for February 15, 2011; Comment Sought on Competitive**  **Bidding Procedures for Auction 90**

**AGENCY :**  Federal Communications Commission.

**ACTION :**  Notice.

**SUMMARY :**  This document announces the auction of certain VHF construction permits scheduled to commence on February 15, 2011 (Auction 90). This document also seeks comment on competitive bidding procedures for Auction 90.

**DATES :**  Comments are due on or before September 30, 2010, and reply comments are due on or before October 15, 2010.

**ADDRESSES :**  You may submit comments, identified by AU Docket No. 10–147, by any of the following methods: