alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §761. Emergency Management Assistance Compact grants

#### (a) In general

The Administrator may make grants to administer the Emergency Management Assistance Compact consented to by the Joint Resolution entitled "Joint Resolution granting the consent of Congress to the Emergency Management Assistance Compact" (Public Law 104–321; 110 Stat. 3877).

#### (b) Uses

A grant under this section shall be used—

(1) to carry out recommendations identified in the Emergency Management Assistance Compact after-action reports for the 2004 and 2005 hurricane season;

(2) to administer compact operations on behalf of all member States and territories;

(3) to continue coordination with the Agency and appropriate Federal agencies;

(4) to continue coordination with State, local, and tribal government entities and their respective national organizations; and

(5) to assist State and local governments, emergency response providers, and organizations representing such providers with credentialing emergency response providers and the typing of emergency response resources.

#### (c) Coordination

The Administrator shall consult with the Administrator of the Emergency Management Assistance Compact to ensure effective coordination of efforts in responding to requests for assistance.

#### (d) Authorization

There is authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section $4,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2018 through 2022. Such sums shall remain available until expended.

(Pub. L. 109–295, title VI, §661, Oct. 4, 2006, 120 Stat. 1432; Pub. L. 115–254, div. D, §1217(b), Oct. 5, 2018, 132 Stat. 3451.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Joint Resolution entitled "Joint Resolution granting the consent of Congress to the Emergency Management Assistance Compact", referred to in subsec. (a), is Pub. L. 104–321, Oct. 19, 1996, 110 Stat. 3877, which is not classified to the Code.

#### Amendments

2018—Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 115–254 substituted "for each of fiscal years 2018 through 2022" for "for fiscal year 2008".
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

MICHAEL R. DORCZUK,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 210 MAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 21st day of September, 2020

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
## U NITED 

## S TATES 

## N AVY



## – M ARINE 

## C ORPS 

## C OURT OF 

## C RIMINAL 

## A PPEALS

_________________________ No

. 201 600405

_________________________ 

### UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Appellee

v. 

### EDWIN I . AGUINALDO, JR. Sergeant (E

- 5 ), U

. S

. Marine Corps

Appellant

_________________________ A ppeal from the United States Navy

- Marine Corps Trial Judiciary

Military Judge: C olonel James K. Carberry, USMC

. Convening Authority: C ommanding General, 1 st Marine Division

(REIN), Camp Pendleton, CA. Staff Judge Advocate’s Recommendation: Lieutenant Colo nel

Matthew J. Stewart, USMC

. For Appellant : Lieutenant Commander Derek C. Hampton, JAGC, USN

. For Appellee: Brian K. Keller, Esq.

_________________________ Decided 9 M arch 2017

_________________________ Before C AMPBELL , H UTCHISON , and E LLINGTON , Appellate Military Judges

_________________________ After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of error, we affirm the findings and sentence as approved by the convening authority. Art. 66(c), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c).

For the Court

R.H. TROIDL Clerk of Court
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

Oct ober 25, 2019

No. 04

- 19

- 00539

- CV

Cristina PADILLA

, Appellant

v.

RED LOBSTER HOSPITALITY, LLC

,

Appelle e

From the 57th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016

- CI

- 21243 Honorable Antonia Arteaga, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellant filed a notice of appeal on August 9, 2019. On August 30, 2019, we issued an

order questioning our jurisdiction over this appeal . We noted the clerk’s record did not contain a signed judgment disposing of all parties and claims. W e suspended all appellate deadlines pending our determination of jurisdiction.

On October 23, 2019, the trial court clerk filed a supplemental clerk’s record that

contains a judgment signed by the trial court on Oct ober 2, 2019. The judgment disposes of all parties and claims. Therefore, w e conclude that we have jurisdiction over this appeal.

Our previous order suspending appellate deadlines is lifted. The reporter’s record was filed on October 24, 2019. The appel lant’s brief is due on or before November 25, 2019

.

_________________________________ Irene Rios , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 25th day of October, 2019

.

___________________________________ L uz E strada

, Chief Deputy Clerk
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

February 8, 2012 

Order 

 

February 8, 2012 

140147(73) 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

 SC: 140147 

v COA: 274148 

St. Clair CC: 03-000881-FH 

JAMES EUGENE GRISSOM, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________ 

 On order of the Chief Justice, the motion by the Innocence Network for leave to 

file a brief amicus curiae in this case is considered and it is granted.
### §396. Inspection of livestock, hides, animal products, etc.; place; charges; disposition of funds

The Secretary of Agriculture upon application of any exporter, importer, packer, or owner of, or the agent thereof, or dealer in, livestock, hides, skins, meat, or other animal products may, in his discretion, cause to be made inspections and examinations at places other than the headquarters of inspectors for the convenience of said applicants, who may be charged for the expenses of travel and subsistence incurred for such inspections and examinations, the funds derived from such charges to be deposited in the Treasury of the United States to the credit of the appropriation from which the expenses are paid.

(Sept. 21, 1944, ch. 412, title I, §101(c), 58 Stat. 734.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 228a of this title.

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to those in this section were carried in the following prior Department of Agriculture Appropriation Acts:

June 28, 1944, ch. 296, 58 Stat. 433.

July 12, 1943, ch. 215, 57 Stat. 400.

July 22, 1942, ch. 516, 56 Stat. 673.

July 1, 1941, ch. 267, 55 Stat. 415.

June 25, 1940, ch. 421, 54 Stat. 539.

June 30, 1939, ch. 253, title I, 53 Stat. 948.

June 16, 1938, ch. 464, title I, 52 Stat. 719.

June 29, 1937, ch. 404, 50 Stat. 403.

June 4, 1936, ch. 489, 49 Stat. 1429.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Authorization of Appropriation

Authorization of appropriation of sums necessary for the purposes of this section, see note under section 395 of this title.
### §2009cc–11. Examinations

#### (a) In general

Each rural business investment company that participates in the program established under this subchapter shall be subject to examinations made at the direction of the Secretary in accordance with this section.

#### (b) Assistance of private sector entities

An examination under this section may be conducted with the assistance of a private sector entity that has the qualifications and the expertise necessary to conduct such an examination.

#### (c) Costs

#### (1) In general

The Secretary may assess the cost of an examination under this section, including compensation of the examiners, against the rural business investment company examined.

#### (2) Payment

Any rural business investment company against which the Secretary assesses costs under this paragraph shall pay the costs.

#### (d) Deposit of funds

Funds collected under this section shall—

(1) be deposited in the account that incurred the costs for carrying out this section;

(2) be made available to the Secretary to carry out this section, without further appropriation; and

(3) remain available until expended.

(Pub. L. 87–128, title III, §384L, as added Pub. L. 107–171, title VI, §6029, May 13, 2002, 116 Stat. 399.)
§ 776.8 Professional Responsibility Committee. ( a ) *Composition.* This standing committee will consist of the Assistant Judge Advocate General (AJAG) for Military Justice; the Deputy Chiefs of Staff for Naval Legal Service Offices (or Defense Services Offices, effective 1 October 2012), and Region Legal Service Offices; the Chief Judge, Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary; and in cases involving Marine Corps judge advocates, the Deputy Staff Judge Advocate to the Commandant of the Marine Corps (DSJA to CMC); and such other personnel as the JAG from time-to-time may appoint. A majority of the members constitutes a quorum. The Chairman of the Committee shall be the AJAG for Military Justice. The Chairman may excuse members disqualified for cause, illness, or exigencies of military service, and may appoint additional or alternate members on a permanent basis.
( b ) *Purpose.* ( 1 ) When requested by the JAG, the SJA to CMC, or the Rules Counsel, the Committee will provide formal advisory opinions to the JAG regarding application of subpart B of this part to individual or hypothetical cases.
( 2 ) On its own motion, the Committee may also issue formal advisory opinions on ethical issues of importance to the DoN legal community.
( 3 ) Upon written request, the Committee may also provide formal advisory opinions to covered attorneys about the propriety of proposed courses of action under subpart B of this part. If such requests are predicated upon full disclosure of all relevant facts, and if the Committee advises that the proposed course of conduct does not violate subpart B of this part, then no adverse action under this rule may be taken against a covered attorney who acts consistently with the Committee's advice. Such requests must be made via the Rules Counsel.
( 4 ) The Chairman will forward copies of all opinions issued by the Committee to the Rules Counsel.
( c ) *Limitation.* The Committee will not normally provide ethics advice or opinions concerning professional responsibility matters that are then the subject of litigation.
1

Kelly, Shaheerah

From: Kelly, Shaheerah

Sent: Wednesday, September 02, 2015 12:33 PM

To: tbillie@navajo-nsn.gov; oramm@navajo-nsn.gov; tbegay@navajo-nsn.gov

Cc: Kelly, Shaheerah

Subject: NHPA Consultation for McElmo Creek Unit Flare

Good Afternoon,

The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Region 9 is processing a federal Clean Air Act air

quality permit for the McElmo Creek Unit (MCU) Flare. The undertaking triggering consultation under the

National Historic Preservation (NHPA) is the issuance of this Clean Air Act permit. The EPA is the lead federal

agency, and only agency, involved in this undertaking.

Other than the potential installation of a variable speed fan on the Flare, EPA’s undertaking does not authorize

any new construction or modification of existing equipment at the MCU Facility. The undertaking results in no

new surface disturbance or change in operations and therefore will have no effect on eligible historic

properties located within 2 km area of potential effects for the Flare.

I would appreciate talking to you this week or early next week about this action before sending you official

documentation to initiate the NHPA consultation. Please let me know if you are available at the following

times to discuss this action:

10:00 am MST, Thurs, 9/3

10:00 am MST, Fri, 9/4

10:00 am MST, Mon, 9/7

10:00 am MST, Tues, 9/8

I look forward to your response.

Thank you.

************************************ 

Shaheerah Kelly 

Permits Office, Air Division (AIR-3) 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

Phone: 415-947-4156 

Fax: 415-947-3579 

Email: kelly.shaheerah@epa.gov
§ 776.93 Revalidation. ( a ) Covered USG attorneys to whom permission is given to engage in the outside practice of law will notify the JAG in writing, via their chain of command, within 30 days of any material change in: ( 1 ) The nature or scope of the outside practice described in their requests, including termination, or
( 2 ) Their DoN assignment or responsibilities.
( b ) Covered USG attorneys to whom permission is given to engage in the outside practice of law will annually resubmit an application to continue the practice, with current information, by October 1 each year.
EX-10.8
                           PROMISSORY NOTE


$  54,131.67

For value received I promise to pay to the order of 3Si, Inc. at
its offices in Englewood, Colorado, $ 54,131.67 on July 1, 2004
plus interest accruing from June 30, 1999, at the rate of 5.37%
compounded annually.

This Note is secured by __260,000__________ shares of 3Si
Holdings, Inc. common stock.

Signed: /s/  Felipe L. Valdez
Print or type name: ____Felipe L. Valdez_______________
Date: _____10-8-2001___________________________
Englewood, Colorado
# appendix1

&"Arial,Regular"DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Summary of Discretionary Appropriations, FY 2017 - FY 2019 President's Budget (dollars in thousands) 	February 12, 2018
July 13, 2015

U.S. Department of Transportation

Docket Management System

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE

Washington, DC 20590

RE: Amendment to Section 333 Exemption 11957 issued on the Federal Aviation Regulations in 

Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2015-1401.

Dear Sir or Madam:

DronEye Imaging LLC. was issued an Exemption numbered 11957 (hereinafter the

Exemption) for the purpose of aerial photography, cinematography, videography, mapping, 

crop surveying, and inspections. DronEye Imaging LLC requests an amendment to the 

exemption to allow for three (3) additional types of unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) that fully 

comply with the conditions of the Exemption.

DronEye Imaging LLC. wishes to operate the DJI Phantom 3, 3D Robotics Solo, and the TBS 

Discovery under the same conditions contained in the exemption. 

Attached also are the QuickStart Guides for the three (3) additional UAS. All operations of the 

additional UAS will be in full compliance with the terms of the Exemption. All 3 UAS have been 

previously approved in various other Section 333 Exemptions.

Please contact the undersigned should you have any questions concerning this request

for amendment to the Exemption.

Sincerely,

Brian A. Pfaehler

DronEye Imaging LLC

5127 S 200 W

Trafalgar, IN 46181

Tele: (317) 443-7013
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Jeffrey A. Ludrof, Chief Executive Officer of Erie Family Life Insurance
Company, certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Erie
Family Life Insurance Company;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in
this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and have:  a.
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report
is being prepared;b.
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report
our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by
this report based on such evaluation; andc.
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting that
occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and  5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit
committee of registrants board of directors:  a.
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses
in the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting, which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; andb.
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in
the registrants internal control over financial reporting. Date: August 20, 2004 /s/ Jeffrey A. LudrofJeffrey A. Ludrof, President & CEO
### §2279k. Authorization of protection operations for the Secretary of Agriculture and others

#### (a) In general

The Department of Agriculture is authorized to employ qualified law enforcement officers or special agents to provide—

(1) protection for the Secretary and the Deputy Secretary during the performance of official duties by each such officer and during any activity that is preliminary or postliminary to the performance of official duties by each such officer;

(2) protection, incidental to the protection provided pursuant to paragraph (1), to an individual accompanying each such officer who is participating in an activity or event relating to the official duties of each such officer when there is an articulable threat to such individual;

(3) continuous protection to the Secretary and Deputy Secretary (including during periods not described in paragraph (1)) if there is an articulable threat of physical harm, in accordance with guidelines established by the Secretary; and

(4) protection of another senior officer representing the Secretary (including a person nominated to be the Secretary during the pendency of such nomination) if there is an articulable threat of physical harm, in accordance with guidelines established by the Secretary.

#### (b) Authorities of the protective operation

#### (1) In general

The Secretary may authorize officers or special agents employed pursuant to subsection (a)—

(A) to carry firearms;

(B) to conduct criminal investigations into potential threats to the security of persons protected under this section;

(C) to make arrests without a warrant for any offense against the United States committed in the presence of such officer or special agent;

(D) to perform protective intelligence work, including identifying and mitigating potential threats and conducting advance work to review security matters relating to sites and events; and

(E) to coordinate with local law enforcement agencies.

#### (2) Guidelines

The authority conveyed under this section shall be exercised in accordance with any—

(A) guidelines issued by the Attorney General; and

(B) such additional guidelines as may be issued by the Secretary.

#### (c) Exception

The authorities granted under this section may be exercised notwithstanding section 1343(b)(1) of title 31.

#### (d) Report

Not later than September 30, 2019, and each September 30 through 2024, the Secretary shall provide to the Committee on Agriculture of the House of Representatives and Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry of the Senate a report describing the protection provided, and accounting for the expenditures made, pursuant to this section.

(Pub. L. 115–334, title XII, §12520, Dec. 20, 2018, 132 Stat. 5001.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Definition of "Secretary"

"Secretary" means the Secretary of Agriculture, see section 2 of Pub. L. 115–334, set out as a note under section 9001 of this title.
§ 756.4 Responsibility. ( a ) All claims resulting from NAFIs should be submitted to the command having cognizance over the NAFI involved. The claim will then be forwarded to the Tort Claims Unit (TCU) Norfolk located at the following address: Department of the Navy, Office of the Judge Advocate General, Tort Claims Unit Norfolk, 9620 Maryland Avenue, Suite 100, Norfolk, VA 23511-2989.
( b ) The TCU Norfolk has cognizance over all DoN claims. Normally, the TCU Norfolk has primary responsibility for the negotiation and settlement of NAFI claims. This is because NAFIs are Federal agencies within the meaning of the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) if the NAFI is charged with an essential function of the DoN and if the degree of control and supervision by the Navy is more than casual or perfunctory. Compare *United States* v. *Holcombe,* 277 F.2d 143 (4th Cir. 1960) and *Scott* v. *United States,* 226 F. Supp. 846, (D. Ga. 1963). Consequently, to the extent sovereign immunity is waived by the FTCA, 28 U.S.C. 1346(b), 2671-2672, 2674-2680, the United States remains ultimately liable for payment of NAFI claims.
[72 FR 53425, Sept. 19, 2007]
### §397. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, acts Aug. 28, 1954, ch. 1041, title II, §204(e), 68 Stat. 900; Apr. 2, 1956, ch. 159, §2, 70 Stat. 87, authorized transfer of Commodity Credit Corporation funds not to exceed $17,000,000 for fiscal year ending June 30, 1956 and not to exceed $20,000,000 for each of fiscal years 1957 and 1958 for brucellosis eradication, indemnification for destroyed cattle and administrative expenses and authorized appropriations to reimburse the Commodity Credit Corporation for the expenditures.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 639 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 639

 To clarify that nonprofit organizations such as Habitat for Humanity 
    may accept donated mortgage appraisals, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 15, 2017

 Mr. Portman (for himself, Mr. Bennet, and Mrs. Capito) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                  Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To clarify that nonprofit organizations such as Habitat for Humanity 
    may accept donated mortgage appraisals, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Housing Opportunities Made Easier 
Act'' or the ``HOME Act''.

SEC. 2. EXEMPTION FROM TRUTH IN LENDING ACT.

    Section 129E(i) of the Truth in Lending Act (15 U.S.C. 1639e(i)) is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
            ``(4) Rule of construction related to appraisal 
        donations.--For purposes of paragraph (1), if a fee appraiser 
        voluntarily donates appraisal services to an organization 
        described in section 170(c)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
        1986, such voluntary donation shall be deemed customary and 
        reasonable.''.
                                 <all>
```