alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT

P-10-0524 C

P-10-0524, P-10-0525

Focus Ready Draft 9/13/2010

ENGINEER: Prothero \ EV

PV (kg/yr): 

Revision Notes/Assessment Overview:

SUBMITTER: The Dow Chemical Company (submitter)

USE:

OTHER USES:

MSDS: Yes LABEL: No

Gen Eqpt: Use only with adequate general or local exhaust ventilation. Use chemical goggles. Use chemical 

resistant gloves (butyl rubber, polyethylene, chlorinated polyethylene, EVAL, PVC, or nitrile rubber 

recommended). Use face shield, boots, apron, or full body suit, depending on the task.

Respirator: Use an approved air-purifying respirator equipped with an organic vapor sorbent and a particle filter. 

For situations where levels may exceed the effectiveness of an air-purifying respirator, use a positive-pressure 

air-supplying respirator (air line or self-contained breathing apparatus).

Health Effects: May cause moderate eye irritation and slight temporary corneal injury. Prolonged contact may 

cause slight skin irritation with local redness. Excessive inhalation exposure may cause irritation to upper 

respiratory tract and lungs. May cause pulmonary edema.

TLV/PEL: -

CRSS: (9/2/2010):

Chemical Name:

S-H2O: g/L @ 

VP: 1.0E-6 torr @ 

MW: 

Physical State and Misc CRSS Info:

Neat: Solid (est.) Mfg: 

Proc/Form: 

Consumer Use

SAT (concerns): (9/3/2010):

Related Cases and Misc SAT Info:

EPA SANITIZED

Page 1 of 4
Migration to groundwater: Negligible

PBT rating: P3 B1 T1 ; PMN: P1B1T1; Hyd Pdt: P3B1T1 (P10-0524 and P10-0525)

Health: 1-2, Dermal, Inhalation

Eco: 1, No releases to Water

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 2B

NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS:

Generated by the 06/07/2005 version of ChemSTEER. 

POLLUTION PREVENTION CONSIDERATIONS:

P2 REC:

EXPOSURE-BASED REVIEW: 

EPA SANITIZED

Page 2 of 4
P-10-0524 C

P-10-0524, P-10-0525

Manufacturing

Number of Sites/Location: 

Basis: 

Process Description:

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

No releases were assessed due to the following:

RELEASE TOTAL

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

Tot. # of workers exposed via assessed routes: 

Basis:

Dermal:

Exposure to 

High End: 

Number of workers (all sites) with Dermal exposure:

Basis: 

EPA SANITIZED

Page 3 of 4
P-10-0524 C

P-10-0524, P-10-0525

Use: 

Number of Sites/Location: 

 

Basis: 

Process Description:

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

RELEASE TOTAL

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

Tot. # of workers exposed via assessed routes: 

Basis: 

Dermal:

Exposure to 

High End: 

Number of workers (all sites) with Dermal exposure:

Basis: 

Inhalation:

Exposure to 

Upper Bound: 

Number of workers (all sites) with Inhalation exposure:

Basis:

INHALATION MONITORING DATA REVIEW

1) Uncertainty (estimate based on model, regulatory limit, or data not specific to industry): 

2) (a) Exposure level > 1 mg/day? 

 (b) Hazard Rating for health of 2 or greater? 

Inhalation Monitoring Data Desired? 

EPA SANITIZED

Page 4 of 4
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         Heart, Lung, and Blood Initial Review Group; Single-Site and Pilot Clinical Trials Review Committee.                    

*Date:*                         February 24-25, 2021.                    

*Time:*                         9:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, 6705 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20817 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Carol (Chang-Sook) Kim, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Office of Scientific Review/DERA, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, 6705 Rockledge Drive, Room 206-B, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 827-7940,                         *carolko@mail.nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.233, National Center for Sleep Disorders Research; 93.837, Heart and Vascular Diseases Research; 93.838, Lung Diseases Research; 93.839, Blood Diseases and Resources Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS) 

Dated: January 6, 2021.

David W Freeman,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2021-00346 Filed 1-11-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
17''1 

MATT HATCHETT 

REPRESENTATIVE. DISTRICT 150 

100 CANTERBURY ROAD 

DUBLIN. GEORGIA 31021 

:J{ouse of 9{epresentatives STANDING COMITTEES: 

E-MAIL: matt.hatchett@house.ga.gov 

The Honorable Anthony R. Foxx 

Secretary of Transportation 

US Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

The Honorable John F. Kerry 

Secretary of State 

US Department of State 

2201 C Street NW 

Washington, DC 20520 

Secretaries Foxx and Kerry: 

MAJORITY CAUCUS CHAIRMAN 

415 STATE CAPITOL 

ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30334 

(404) 656-5025 

(404) 657-8278 (FAX) 

APPROPRIATIONS-PUBLIC SAFETY 

ENERGY, UTILITIES & TELECOMMUNICATIONS 

HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES 

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT & TOURISM 

April 29, 2015 

Here in Georgia we play by the rules and a deal is a deal. If someone gets a 5 minute head start in a race, 

that's breaking the rules. I believe in fair competition and I believe a deal is a deal. I'm bothered by 

recent reports that the United Arab Emirates and Qatar are providing massive subsidies to their airline 

carriers. These subsidies have essentially given their airlines-Qatar Airways, Etihad Airways, Emirates 

Airline-a 5 minute head start and created an un-level playing field for other airline carriers. This 

includes Delta Air Lines, a company that employs over 33,000 jobs throughout the peach state. 

With Delta Air Lines being the largest private employer in Georgia and the Atlanta Hartsfield Airport 

being the busiest airport in the world, our state has a lot at stake should these rules continue to be 

broken. And, with the Gulf carriers expanding into U.S. markets at such a rapid rate due to the $42 

billion in subsidies and other unfair benefits they have received over the past ten years from their 

governments, it is likely that the U.S. will lose out on key flight routes and that the people and 

businesses in Georgia who rely on a robust airline industry for their livelihood will be short changed. 

It's time for the United Arab Emirates and Qatar to play by the rules they agreed upon when they signed 

the Open Skies agreements with the United States. I ask that you p open direct consultations with Qatar 

and the UAE.on this matter. A deal is a deal. 

Thank you for your attention to this important issue. 

Sincer~,-

J. Matthew Hatchett 

s 10-150505-026 
House of !l?g.presentatives 

Jil.tfanta, yeorgia 

MATT HATCHETT 

Representative, District 143 

100 Canterbury Rd. 

Dublin, GA 31021 

s 10-150505-026 

The Honorable Anthony R. Foxx 

Secretary of Transportation 

U S Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Hasler 

04/29/2015 

US POSTAGE' 

:20590 1, •II' •lui• 1111,11111,,1111•11 "II' 1111 1, J1 11'•, ,, 1111 •'hl'll'l 

$00.482 

ZIP 30334 

011011642736
### §5214. Reorganization evaluation

The Secretary of Agriculture shall evaluate the reorganization proposal recommended by the National Commission on Agricultural Trade and Export Policy and other proposals to improve management of international trade activities of the Department of Agriculture. To assist the Secretary in the evaluation, the Secretary shall appoint a private sector advisory committee of not less than 4 members, who shall be appointed from among individuals representing farm and commodity organizations, market development cooperators, and agribusiness. Not later than April 30, 1989, the Secretary shall report the findings of the evaluation to Congress, together with the views and recommendations of the private sector advisory committee.

(Pub. L. 100–418, title IV, §4204, Aug. 23, 1988, 102 Stat. 1392.)
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

March 27, 2013

p0320

Order 

March 27, 2013

146212

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 146212

COA: 304875

Saginaw CC: 10-034923-FH

JAMES EARLY HARRIS, JR.,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 27, 2012 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is GRANTED, limited to the issue 

whether the evidence was sufficient to sustain the defendant’s conviction of extortion.
Certification
 Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes  Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Emerson Radio Corp.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and
the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
   Date: November 11, 2009
    /s/ Adrian MaAdrian MaChief Executive Officer
### §2703. Orders of Secretary to egg producers, etc.

To effectuate the declared policy of this chapter, the Secretary shall, subject to the provisions of this chapter, issue and from time to time amend, orders applicable to persons engaged in the hatching and/or sale of egg-type baby chicks and started pullets, persons engaged in the production of commercial eggs and persons who receive or otherwise acquire eggs from such persons and who process, prepare for market, or market such eggs, including eggs of their own production, and persons engaged in the purchase, sale or processing of spent fowl. Such orders shall be applicable to all production or marketing areas, or both, in the United States.

(Pub. L. 93–428, §4, Oct. 1, 1974, 88 Stat. 1172.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Amendment of Egg Promotion and Research Order

Pub. L. 103–188, §5, Dec. 14, 1993, 107 Stat. 2257, provided that: "Notwithstanding any other provision of law:

"(1) In general.—The Secretary of Agriculture shall issue amendments to the egg promotion and research order issued under the Egg Research and Consumer Information Act (7 U.S.C. 2701 et seq.) to implement the amendments made by this Act [see Short Title of 1993 Amendment note set out under section 2701 of this title]. The amendments shall be issued after public notice and opportunity for comment in accordance with section 553 of title 5, United States Code, and without regard to sections 556 and 557 of such title. The Secretary shall issue the proposed amendments to the order not later than 80 days after the date of enactment of this Act [Dec. 14, 1993].

"(2) Effective date.—The amendments to the egg promotion and research order required by paragraph (1) shall become effective not later than—

"(A) 30 days after the proposed amendments are issued; or

"(B) if the Director of the Office of Management and Budget determines that the amendments are a significant action that requires review by the Director, 50 days after the proposed amendments are issued.

"(3) Referendum.—The amendments referred to in paragraph (2) shall not be subject to a referendum conducted under the Egg Research and Consumer Information Act."
Fiscal Year 2012 Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies - NEVADA

FY 2012 Title I

LEA ID District Allocation*

3200390 Carson City School District 1,458,047

3200030 Churchill County School District 689,290

3200060 Clark County School District 84,780,705

3200090 Douglas County School District 663,280

3200120 Elko County School District 751,046

3200150 Esmeralda County School District 15,591

3200180 Eureka County School District 29,546

3200210 Humboldt County School District 326,455

3200240 Lander County School District 95,526

3200270 Lincoln County School District 142,274

3200300 Lyon County School District 1,246,546

3200330 Mineral County School District 147,623

3200360 Nye County School District 1,454,321

3200420 Pershing County School District 169,868

3200450 Storey County School District 50,001

3200480 Washoe County School District 13,302,117

3200510 White Pine County School District 156,877

3299999 PART D SUBPART 2 1,015,686

* Actual amounts received by LEAs will be smaller than shown here due to State-level adjustments to Federal Title I allocations. States adjust

 allocations, for example, to reflect LEA boundary changes or the creation of new LEAs, including charter school LEAs, that are not accounted

 for in the statutory calculations. States also are permitted to reserve, for administration, up to 1 percent of the allocations they would receive

 if $14 billion were appropriated and generally must reserve 4 percent in fiscal year 2012 for school improvement activities. These 

 adjustments will reduce the actual amounts available.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      2,619
<COMMON>                                    10,536,436
<OTHER-SE>                                (10,539,055)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Motion Denied and Order filed July 28, 2016 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-16-00176-CR

NO. 14-16-00177-CR

NO. 14-16-00178-CR

____________

JASSSAN RASHAAD HUGHES, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 174th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. 1413584, 1392119, and 1413583

ORDER

On December 18, 2015, appellant entered a plea of guilty in each of these 

three case without an agreed recommendation as to sentencing. Following a 

presentence investigation hearing, the trial court sentenced appellant on February 

19, 2016. Appellant filed a motion to abate these appeals because each of the clerk’s 

records contains two certifications of appellant’s right to appeal: one signed 

December 18, 2015, that states he waived the right to appeal; and one signed 
February 19, 2016, that states he has the right to appeal. 

Although negotiated waivers of the right to appeal are valid, non-negotiated 

waivers of the right to appeal are valid only if the defendant waived the right of 

appeal, knowing with certainty the punishment that would be assessed. See 

Washington v. State, 363 S.W.3d 589, 589–90 (Tex. Crim. App. 2012); Monreal v. 

State, 99 S.W.3d 615 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003). The record in this case does not appear 

to reflect that appellant waived his right to appeal knowing with certainty the 

punishment that would be assessed. See Ex parte Delaney, 207 S.W.3d 794, 799 

(Tex. Crim. App. 2006); Blanco v. State, 18 S.W.3d 218, 219 (Tex. Crim. App. 

2000). Therefore, the trial court’s February 19, 2016, certifications correctly indicate 

appellant has the right to appeal. 

Accordingly, the motion to abate is DENIED. Appellant’s brief is due by 

August 18, 2016.
| Name                                                      |   | Jurisdiction of Incorporation |   | Ownership Interest |
|-----------------------------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------|--------|--------------------|
|                                                      |   |                          |   |               |
| Compañía Minera Mexicana de Avino, S.A. de C.V. |   | Mexico                        |   | 99.66%             |
|                                                      |   |                          |   |               |
| Promotora Avino S.A. De C.V.                              |   | Mexico                        |   | 79.09%             |
|                                                      |   |                          |   |               |
| Oniva Silver and Gold Mines S.A. de C.V.                  |   | Mexico                        |   | 100%               |
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6,1

Eastern Division

Innovatio IP Ventures, LLC, Patent Litigation,

et al.

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:11−cv−09308

Honorable James F.

Holderman

PMC Joint Venture L.P. 2003−1, et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Tuesday, April 21, 2015:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable James F. Holderman: Defendants Marvell

Semiconductor and MediaTek USA's agreed motion [1185] for extension of time to

respond to plaintiff Innovatio's respective complaints against them is granted. Marvell and

MediaTek shall answer, move, or otherwise respond to the respective complaints filed

against them by 6/11/2015. Notices mailed by Judicial Staff. (mgh, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:11-cv-09308 Document #: 1188 Filed: 04/21/15 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:48038
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6,1

Eastern Division

Henry Espejo, et al.

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:11−cv−08987

Honorable Charles P. Kocoras

Santander Consumer USA, Inc.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Tuesday, June 24, 2014:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Charles P. Kocoras: Status hearing held on

6/24/2014. Parties informed the Court that no settlement has been reached at this time.

Parties are directed to meet and confer as stated on the record. Fact discovery including

class fact discovery to be completed by 1/6/2015. Status hearing set for 1/6/2015 at 9:30

a.m. Mailed notice(yp, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:11-cv-08987 Document #: 71 Filed: 06/24/14 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:604
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF


THE
SARBANES - OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Composite Technology Corporation (the "Company") Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Domonic
J. Carney, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to


Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/
      Domonic J. CarneyDomonic
      J. CarneyChief Financial
      Officer(Principal
      Financial and Accounting Officer)




Date:  December
14, 2010