alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE>

                      Emerson Radio Corp. and Subsidiaries
                             Exhibit 11 to Form 10-Q
                     Computation of Basic Earnings Per Share
                      (in thousands, except per share data)

<CAPTION>
                                 Nine Months Ended     Three Months Ended
                                    December 31,         December 31,         
                                  1997       1996       1997      1996
                                                                   
Basic EPS                                                          
   <S>                           <C>        <C>         <C>      <C>
   Income (loss) . . . . . . .   $ (210)    $(16,409)   $  493   $ (5,643)
   Less:  Preferred Stock   
      Dividends. . . . . . . .      327          525        89        175
                                                                
   Income (loss) available to                                   
     Common Stockholders 
     (numerator) . . . . . . .     (537)     (16,934)      404    (5,818)
                                                                
   Weighted average shares                                      
      (denominator). . . . . .   43,463       40,281    47,394    40,295
   Basic earnings (loss) per     
     share(1). . . . . . . . .  $  (.01)    $   (.42)  $   .01   $  (.14)

</TABLE>
                                                                

(1)   Options and warrants to purchase approximately 1.1 million(a) and  670,000
shares  of  Common  Stock  at  $1.00 to $2.88 and  $1.10  to  $4.00  per  share,
respectively, were outstanding during the period ending December  31,  1997  but
were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because their
exercise  price was greater than the average market price of the  common  shares
and, therefore, the effect would be anti-dilutive.

Convertible   preferred  stock  equivalent  to  15.8  million   common   shares,
Convertible  Senior  Subordinated Debentures equivalent to  5.2  million  common
shares  if  converted are excluded from the computation of diluted earnings  per
share as their effect would be anti-dilutive.



(a)   Excludes  600,000 options issued to Eugene I. Davis, a  former  executive,
subject to litigation as more fully explained in Note 8.
§ 61.7 Purpose. ( a ) This part is composed of several subparts, each containing its own purpose. The purpose of the overall part is to implement policy, assign responsibilities, and provide procedures for addressing child abuse and domestic abuse in military communities.
( b ) This subpart prescribes uniform program standards (PSs) for all installation FAPs.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
EASTERN DIVISION

TRUSTEES OF THE CHICAGO PAINTERS
AND DECORATORS PENSION FUND,
TRUSTEES OF THE CHICAGO PAINTERS
AND DECORATORS HEALTH AND
WELFARE FUND, TRUSTEES OF THE
CHICAGO PAINTERS AND DECORATORS
DEFERRED SAVINGS FUND, TRUSTEES OF
THE CHICAGO PAINTERS AND
DECORATORS APPRENTICESHIP FUND,
TRUSTEES OF THE CHICAGO PAINTERS
AND DECORATORS SCHOLARSHIP FUND,
AND TRUSTEES OF THE CHICAGO
PAINTERS AND DECORATORS JOINT
COOPERATION TRUST FUND,

No. 12 C 172

Judge Kendall

Magistrate Denlow

Plaintiffs,

v.

NIKOLAS PAINTING CONTRACTORS, INC.,
an Illinois corporation,

IR OO

Defendant.
MOTION FOR ORDER OF DEFAULT AND JUDGMENT IN SUM CERTAIN

Plaintiffs, by one of their attorneys, DONALD D. SCHWARTZ, JAMES R.
ANDERSON, GREGORY W. HOSE and ARNOLD AND KADJAN, pursuant to F.R.C.P. 55,
respectfully request this Honorable Court to enter an Order of Default as to liability and
Judgment in favor of Plaintiffs and against Defendant, NIKOLAS PAINTING
CONTRACTORS, INC., an Illinois corporation.

In support thereof, Plaintiffs state:

1. This case was filed on January 10, 2012.


2. Defendant was served with Summons and Complaint on January 17, 2012.

3. In excess of 20 days have expired since Service of Process, however, Defendant
has failed to file an answer or otherwise plead.

4. Per the affidavit of Richard J. Wolf, an audit of Defendant demonstrated that
Defendant owes Plaintiffs Trustees of the Chicago Painters and Decorators, et al, for the audit
period April 1, 2010 through June 30, 2011 for $166,696.84 in contributions, $25,004.52 in
liquidated damages, and $1,620.00 audit costs for a total due of $193,321.36. (Exhibit A)

5. Per the affidavit of Gregory W. Hosé, attorney for Plaintiffs in legal fees and
expenses $1,409.00 has been incurred in this suit. (Exhibit B)

WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs pray for:

1. An Order of Default against the Defendant.

2. Judgment be rendered in the amount of $194,730.36 for Plaintiffs Trustees of the
Chicago Painters and Decorators, et. al., and against defendant, NIKOLAS PAINTING
CONTRACTORS, INC.

Respectfully submitted,

TRUSTEES OF THE CHICAGO PAINTERS
AND DECORATORS PENSION FUND, et al.,

By: s/Gregory W. Hosé
One of their Attorneys

Donald D. Schwartz

James R. Anderson
Gregory W. Hosé
ARNOLD AND KADJAN
203 N. LaSalle St.,Ste. 1650
Chicago, IL 60601
312-236-0415 (phone)
### §6972. Repealed. Pub. L. 115–334, title XII, §12414(a)(6), Dec. 20, 2018, 132 Stat. 4981

Section, Pub. L. 103–354, title II, §252, Oct. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 3227, related to program staff.
Order Form (01/2005)

United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois

Name of Assigned Judge

or Magistrate Judge Samuel Der-Yeghiayan Sitting Judge if Otherthan Assigned Judge

CASE NUMBER 12 C 343 DATE 1/26/2012

CASE

TITLE

Jesse Blake (#1798114) vs. Cook County Jail

DOCKET ENTRY TEXT

For the reasons stated below, Plaintiff has not alleged sufficient facts to plausibly suggest a valid claim for

relief, the instant action is dismissed. All pending dates and motions are hereby stricken as moot. Civil case

terminated. 

O[ For further details see text below.] Docketing to mail notices.

STATEMENT

This matter is before the court on Plaintiff Jesse Blake’s (Blake) motion for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915, “[n]otwithstanding any filing fee, or any portion thereof, that may

have been paid, the court shall dismiss the case at any time if the court determines that . . . the action . . . fails

to state a claim on which relief may be granted. . . .” Id. 

Since Blake is proceeding pro se, the court has liberally construed his pro se complaint. Blake

indicates in his complaint that he is bringing an action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. However, Blake makes

only general and conclusory references to “negligence,” violations of civil rights, and “pain and suffering.” 

(Compl. 4). Blake makes broad assertions concerning other individuals, contending that he was harmed by

“the STD Doctors that caused pain and suffering to an uncountable number of persons incarcerated during

the year of 2001-2003 of [his] incarceration.” (Compl. 4). Blake also contends that he has heard that there

“was a class action lawsuit,” and that he was unaware of it until recently. (Compl. 4). Blake does not

include in his complaint facts concerning his alleged injury or state when his alleged injury occurred. Even if

Blake had alleged facts concerning his alleged injury, to the extent that Blake is contending that such an

injury occurred from 2001 to 2003, such a claim would be time-barred at this juncture, and Blake has not

12C343 Jesse Blake (#1798114) vs. Cook County Jail Page 1 of 2
STATEMENT

provided any justification for an untimely filing nearly ten years after the alleged conduct. See Brooks v. City

of Chicago, 564 F.3d 830, 831 (7th Cir. 2009)(stating that the “statute of limitations for § 1983 claims in

Illinois is two years”). Therefore, since Blake has not alleged sufficient facts to plausibly suggest a valid

claim for relief, the instant action is dismissed.

12C343 Jesse Blake (#1798114) vs. Cook County Jail Page 2 of 2
-       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2023-07-14T13:04:44-0400
      - Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401
      - Government Publishing Office
      - Government Publishing Office attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by Government Publishing Office
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A18A0387. ROBERT L. TWIGGS v. THE STATE.

A jury found Robert Twiggs guilty of aggravated child molestation, aggravated

sexual battery, child molestation, rape, statutory rape, and incest, and we affirmed the

denial of his motion for a new trial on appeal. Twiggs v. State, 315 Ga. App. 191

(726 SE2d 680) (2012). He later filed an extraordinary motion for a new trial, which

the trial court denied in July 2017. Twiggs then filed a notice of appeal to this Court. 

We lack jurisdiction.

An appeal from an order denying an extraordinary motion for a new trial must

be initiated by filing an application for discretionary review. OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (7),

(b); Balkcom v. State, 227 Ga. App. 327, 329 (489 SE2d 129) (1997). “[C]ompliance

with the discretionary appeals procedure is jurisdictional.” Fabe v. Floyd, 199 Ga.

App. 322, 332 (1) (405 SE2d 265) (1991). Twiggs’s failure to follow the

discretionary appeal procedure deprives us of jurisdiction over this appeal, which is

hereby DISMISSED. See id.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

October 26, 2017

10/26/2017
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1527 

Recognizing October 2024 as ‘‘American Pharmacists Month’’ in honor of 

the contribution of pharmacists to provide safe, accessible, affordable, 

and beneficial patient care services and products to all residents and 

protect the public health of our communities. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 1, 2024 

Mr. GREEN of Tennessee (for himself, Mr. CARTER of Georgia, and Mrs. 

HARSHBARGER) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 

the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing October 2024 as ‘‘American Pharmacists 

Month’’ in honor of the contribution of pharmacists to 

provide safe, accessible, affordable, and beneficial patient 

care services and products to all residents and protect 

the public health of our communities. 

Whereas pharmacists are some of the most accessible health 

care providers delivering critical services to patients and 

contributing to the health and well-being of all people; 

Whereas pharmacists are best positioned to be the health 

care provider that ensures optimal medication therapy 

outcomes, and helping to ensure patients are adherent to 

their medications; 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1527 IH 

Whereas, with a community pharmacy located within 5 miles 

of nearly all Americans, pharmacists and pharmacy personnel are best suited to work collaboratively with other 

health care providers and are making an impact helping 

patients overcome illness and live healthier lives through 

chronic disease management and the full, effective use of 

their medicines; 

Whereas, today, there are over 300,000 licensed pharmacists, 

over 400,000 pharmacy technicians, and 47,000 student 

pharmacists providing care and serving as patient advocates to ensure access to the best and safest therapy to 

the patients they serve; and 

Whereas the American Pharmacists Association, the Tennessee Pharmacists Association, the Georgia Pharmacy 

Association, and all other State pharmacist and pharmacy associations have declared October as ‘‘American 

Pharmacists Month’’: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) recognizes ‘‘American Pharmacists Month’’ 

3 in honor of the contribution of pharmacists to pro4 vide safe, accessible, affordable, and beneficial pa5 tient care services and products to all residents and 

6 protect the public health of our communities; 

7 (2) pledges to celebrate contributions of phar8 macists to the health and well-being of all people in 

9 each State; 

10 (3) recognizes pharmacists as one of the most 

11 accessible health care providers delivering critical 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 1527 IH 

1 services to patients and contributing to the health 

2 and well-being of all people; and 

3 (4) commits to working collaboratively with 

4 pharmacists and other health care providers to help 

5 patients overcome illness and live healthier lives 

6 through chronic disease management and the full, 

7 effective use of their medicines. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Douglas H. Miller, Chief Executive Officer of EXCO Resources, Inc.
certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 3 on Form 10-K/A to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of EXCO Resources, Inc.; and
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |  |  |  |  |                       |  |                        
|----------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | --------------------- |  | -----------------------
|                        |  |  | 
|Date: February 22, 2011 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ DOUGLAS H. MILLER
|                        |  |  |  |  |  |                       |  | Douglas H. Miller      
|                        |  |  |  |  |  |                       |  | Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 99

                        TXU GAS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
                   CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED INCOME
                                   (Unaudited)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                             Twelve Months Ended
                                                                March 31, 2002
                                                             -------------------
                                                             Millions of Dollars

<S>                                                          <C>
Operating revenues .........................................       $   889
                                                                   -------

 Operating expenses
    Gas purchased for resale ...............................           450
    Operation and maintenance ..............................           255
    Depreciation and other amortization ....................            65
    Goodwill amortization ..................................             6
    Taxes other than income ................................            92
                                                                   -------
        Total operating expenses ...........................           868
                                                                   -------

Operating income ...........................................            21

Other income (deductions) - net ............................            25
                                                                   -------

Income from continuing operations before interest, other
   charges and income taxes ................................            46

Interest income ............................................            14

Interest expense and other charges .........................            74
                                                                   -------

Loss from continuing operations before income taxes ........           (14)

Income tax benefit .........................................            (3)
                                                                   -------

Loss from continuing operations ............................           (11)

Income from discontinued operations, net of tax ............            26
                                                                   -------

Net income .................................................            15

Preferred stock dividends ..................................             4
                                                                   -------

Net income applicable to common stock ......................       $    11
                                                                   =======
</TABLE>
1201.602-2 Responsibilities. ( d ) Each DOT OA is responsible for establishing Contracting Officer's Representative (COR) nomination and appointment procedures consistent with the DOT Acquisition Workforce Career Development Program.
### §627. Dairy forward pricing pilot program

#### (a) Pilot program required

Not later than 90 days after November 29, 1999, the Secretary of Agriculture shall establish a temporary pilot program under which milk producers and cooperatives are authorized to voluntarily enter into forward price contracts with milk handlers.

#### (b) Minimum milk price requirements

Payments made by milk handlers to milk producers and cooperatives, and prices received by milk producers and cooperatives, under the forward contracts shall be deemed to satisfy—

(1) all regulated minimum milk price requirements of paragraphs (B) and (F) of subsection (5) of section 608c of this title; and

(2) the requirement of paragraph (C) of such subsection regarding total payments by each handler.

#### (c) Milk covered by pilot program

#### (1) Covered milk

The pilot program shall apply only with respect to the marketing of federally regulated milk that—

(A) is not classified as Class I milk or otherwise intended for fluid use; and

(B) is in the current of interstate or foreign commerce or directly burdens, obstructs, or affects interstate or foreign commerce in federally regulated milk.

#### (2) Relation to Class I milk

To assist milk handlers in complying with the limitation in paragraph (1)(A) without having to segregate or otherwise individually track the source and disposition of milk, a milk handler may allocate milk receipts from producers, cooperatives, and other sources that are not subject to a forward contract to satisfy the handler's obligations with regard to Class I milk usage.

#### (d) Duration

The authority of the Secretary of Agriculture to carry out the pilot program shall terminate on December 31, 2004. No forward price contract entered into under the program may extend beyond that date.

#### (e) Study and report on effect of pilot program

#### (1) Study

The Secretary of Agriculture shall conduct a study on forward contracting between milk producers and cooperatives and milk handlers to determine the impact on milk prices paid to producers in the United States. To obtain information for the study, the Secretary may use the authorities available to the Secretary under section 608d of this title, subject to the confidentiality requirements of subsection (2) of such section.

#### (2) Report

Not later than April 30, 2002, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition and Forestry of the Senate and the Committee on Agriculture of the House of Representatives a report containing the results of the study.

(May 12, 1933, ch. 25, title I, §23, as added Pub. L. 106–113, div. B, §1000(a)(8) [§3], Nov. 29, 1999, 113 Stat. 1536, 1501A–519.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Another section 23 of act May 12, 1933 amended former section 781 of Title 12, Banks and Banking.
AD Economic Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2013-0401 Directorate ID: 2012-SW-047-AD

Helicopter Model: MD Helicopters Model 369A, 369D, 369E, 369H, 369HE, 369HM, 369HS, 

369F and 369FF Helicopters

Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 827 Helicopters in the US Registry.

Reason: The actions of this AD are intended to prevent a pitch horn from cracking, leading to 

vibration, loss of tail rotor pitch control, and subsequent loss of tail rotor and helicopter control

Costs:

Parts per Helicopter $20 for the inspection; $15,951 to replace the tail 

rotor blade.

Labor per Helicopter

(4.5 work-hours x $85/workhour for the inspection; 1 

work-hour x $85/work-hour 

to replace the tail rotor blade.)

$383 for labor for the inspection; $85 to replace the 

tail rotor blade. 

Other (Explain)

Total Cost per Helicopter $403 for the inspection; $16,036 to replace the tail 

rotor blade.

Total US Fleet Cost $333,281 for the inspection.

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No ()

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No ()

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

Yes ( ) No ()

Project Engineer: Fred Guerin
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Three-Five
Systems, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2002,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Jeffrey D. Buchanan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (3)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or
            78o(d)); and

      (4)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

THREE-FIVE SYSTEMS, INC.


/s/ Jeffrey D. Buchanan
--------------------------------------------
Jeffrey D. Buchanan
Chief Financial Officer

Date:  October 28, 2002


                                       25