alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §1432. Extension of price support on long staple cotton seeds and products

Any price support program in effect on cottonseed or any of its products shall be extended to the same seed and products of the cottons defined under section 1347(a) of this title.

(Oct. 31, 1949, ch. 792, title IV, §420, as added July 17, 1952, ch. 933, §3(2), 66 Stat. 759.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 1347 of this title, referred to in text, was repealed by Pub. L. 98–88, §2, Aug. 26, 1983, 97 Stat. 494.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Inapplicability of Section

Section inapplicable to 2014 through 2018 crops of covered commodities, cotton, and sugar and inapplicable to milk during period beginning Feb. 7, 2014, through Dec. 31, 2018, see section 9092(b)(10) of this title.

Section inapplicable to 2008 through 2012 crops of covered commodities, peanuts, and sugar and inapplicable to milk during period beginning June 18, 2008, through Dec. 31, 2012, see section 8782(b)(10) of this title.

Section inapplicable to 2002 through 2007 crops of covered commodities, peanuts, and sugar and inapplicable to milk during period beginning May 13, 2002, through Dec. 31, 2007, see section 7992(b)(10) of this title.

Section inapplicable to 1996 through 2002 crops of loan commodities, peanuts, and sugar and inapplicable to milk during period beginning Apr. 4, 1996, and ending Dec. 31, 2002, see section 7301(b)(1)(J) of this title.
### §7002. Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be necessary to carry out the activities of the Division.

(Pub. L. 103–354, title II, §283, Oct. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 3235.)
#### Daniel P. French et al., v. Louis Caputo, as President, et al.

Motion for a stay denied, with $10 costs. Concur — Valente, J. P., Stevens, Eager, Steuer and Bergan, JJ.
Ê,
-
,
ÊEÊ
6
"*
 /

:KHUHLVJHRWKHUPDOHQ :KHUHLVJH

HUJ\"

1HDUVXUIDFHKHDWDQRPD IDFHKHDW

OLHVDVVRFLDWHGZLWKPDMRU WHGZLWK

JHRWKHUPDOUHVRXUFHVDUH HVRXUFHV

SULPDULO\FRQFHQWUDWHGQHDU HQWUDWHG

WKHERXQGDULHVRIWHFWRQLF RIWHFWR

SODWHVDQGPDQWOHKRWVSRWV HKRWV

7KH\FDQDOVRRFFXUDWRWKHU FXUDW

SODFHVZKHUHWKHHDUWK·VFUXVW HDUWK·V

LVWKLQQHGRUIUDFWXUHG:KHQ FWXUHG

WKHVHKHDWDQRPDOLHVRFFXULQ DOLHVRF

WKHSUHVHQFHRIZDWHUDQGURFN ZDWHUD

ZLWKVXIÀFLHQWSHUPHDELOLW\ WSHUPHD

K\GURWKHUPDOV\VWHPVDUH DOV\VWHP

IRUPHG7KHVHK\GURWKHUPDO KHVHK\GU

V\VWHPVDUHVRPHWLPHVHYL DUHVRPH

*HRWKHUPDO(QHUJ\IRU *HRWKHUPDO (QHUJ

0LQLQJ$SSOLFDWLRQ 0LQV


 ÓÞi`Ñ ÑL>V

GHQFHGE\VXUIDFHH[SUHVVLRQV

VXFKDVJH\VHUVIXQDUROHV

VWHDPYHQWVDQGKRWSRROV

0LQLQJ H[SORUDWLRQLVRIWHQ

DVVRFLDWHGZLWKWKHHIIHFWVRI

VXFKK\GURWKHUPDOV\VWHPV

RQURFNDOWHUDWLRQ7KHUHDUH

H[WHQVLYHDUHDVLQWKHZHVWHUQ

8QLWHG6WDWHVZLWKVLJQLÀFDQW

JHRWKHUPDOUHVRXUFHSRWHQWLDO

+RZFDQ JHRWKHUPDOUH

VRXUFHVEHXVHG"

*HRWKHUPDOUHVRXUFHVFDQ

EHXVHGWRPDNHHOHFWULFLW\

WKURXJKVWHDPÁDVKVWHDP

RUELQDU\ SODQWSURFHVVHVRU

IRUVRFDOOHGGLUHFWXVHDSSOL

FDWLRQVLQFOXGLQJLQGXVWULDO

SURFHVVLQJGLVWULFWRUVSDFH

KHDWLQJDJULFXOWXUHDTXDFXO

WXUHDQGUHFUHDWLRQ(OHFWULF

LW\ SURGXFHGZLWKJHRWKHUPDO

UHVRXUFHVFDQSURYLGHSRZHU

IRUPLQLQJRSHUDWLRQV/RZHU

WHPSHUDWXUHJHRWKHUPDO

ÁXLGVFDQEHXVHGLQPLQ

LQJIRUKHDS OHDFKLQJGU\LQJ

RSHUDWLRQVDQGVSDFHKHDW

LQJ7KHVHORZHUWHPSHUDWXUH

UHVRXUFHVFDQFRPHGLUHFWO\

IURPWKHJHRWKHUPDOUHVHUYRLU

RUDVWKH ́VSHQWÁXLGμIURP

JHRWKHUPDOHOHFWULFLW\ SURGXF

:KDWLVJHRWKHUPDO

HQHUJ\"

*HRWKHUPDOHQHUJ\LV

OLWHUDOO\KHDWIURPWKH

HDUWK7HPSHUDWXUH

LQFUHDVHJUDGXDOO\ZLWK

GHSWKIURPWKHVXUIDFH

GXHWRWKHLPPHQVHKHDW

IURPWKHHDUWK·VLQWHULRU

+HDWLVFRQWLQXRXVO\

WUDQVIHUUHGXSIURPWKH

PDQWOHLQWRWKHHDUWK·V

FUXVWDQGLVDOVRJHQHU

DWHG IURPWKHGHFD\RI

UDGLRDFWLYHHOHPHQWVLQ

WKHFUXVW:KLOHWKLVHQ

HUJ\LVPDQLIHVWHGDWWKH

HDUWK·VVXUIDFHLQYDULRXV

IRUPVLWLVPRVWXVDEOH

ZKHQDVVRFLDWHGZLWKZD

WHULQWKHIRUPRIVWHDP

RUKRWZDWHUZKLFKFDQ

KDYHDWHPSHUDWXUHDV

KLJKDV&)RU

PRUH
 Ê,
-
,
ÊEÊ
6
"*
 /

*$


 ÓÞi`ÑwÅ ÑwÅ Ó

)RUPRUHLQIRUPDWLRQ

-HUU\/0D\



-HUU\0D\#LQOJRY

,1/LVD86'HSDUWPHQWRI(QHUJ\

QDWLRQDOODERUDWRU\RSHUDWHGE\

%DWWHOOH(QHUJ\$OOLDQFH

WLRQ  FDVFDGHGXVH*HR

WKHUPDOÁXLGVFDQDOVREH

 ́RUHμIRUFRQWDL

VROLGV)R

WLRQR

Á

GLR[LGHZKLOHELQDU\SODQWV  \S

VHQWLDOO\QRDLU

JHRWKHU

H[WUDFWHGLVIUHHDQGHOLPL 

QDWHVRSHUDWLRQDOXQFHUWDLQWLHV

DVVRFLDWHGZLWKWKHYDULDEOH

FRVWRIRWKHUIRUPVRIHQHUJ\

7KH,GDKR1DWLRQDO/DERUD

\,1/LVD86'H

PHQWRI(QHUJ\'2(

ODERUDWRU\ORFDWHGLQ

OV,GDKR7KH,1/

QDWLRQDOODERUD

2(:LQGSRZHU

FWLYLW\DQGKDV

DELOLWLHVDQG

HLQWHJUDWLRQ

QWRSRZHU

RWHDUHDV

7KH0DPPRWK3DFLÀF

ELQDU\SODQWVORFDWHGLQ

0RQR&RXQW\&DOLIRUQLD

KDYHDPHJDZDWWQHWJHQ

HUDWLQJFDSDFLW\DQGRFFXS\ QG RFFXS\

DFUHVZLWKSURGXFWLRQ

DQGLQMHFWLRQZHOOV
Manufactured Home Shipment s January 1, 2013 through December 31, 2013

HUD Thermal Zone 1 State Single Wides Multi Wides Total Floors AL 1084 1312 2396 3740 FL 856 2164 3020 5257 GA 389 1046 1435 2485 HI 0 4 4 8 LA 2661 1618 4279 5978 MS 1184 1263 2447 3744 SC 832 1240 2072 3328 TX 7077 5140 12217 17429 Subtotals 14083 13787 27870 41969

HUD Thermal Zone 2 State Single Wides Multi Wides Total Floors AR 647 821 1468 2300 AZ 288 727 1015 1765 CA 258 1,906 2,164 4,194 KS 197 169 366 534 KY 925 1,338 2,263 3,613 MO 400 408 808 1,215 NC 1,244 1,459 2,703 4,164 NM 441 658 1,099 1,768 OK 871 869 1,740 2,619 TN 681 1,179 1,860 3,050 Subtotals 5952 9534 15486 25222

Page 1 of 2Manufactured Home Shipment s January 1, 2013 through December 31, 2013 HUD Thermal Zone 3 State Single Wides Multi Wides Total Floors AK 57 6 63 69 CO 465 253 718 973 CT 51 48 99 147 DE 100 165 265 432 IA 220 98 318 414 ID 95 177 272 466 IL 451 287 738 1,031 IN 840 315 1,155 1,471 MA 49 84 133 220 MD 169 81 250 331 ME 151 189 340 529 MI 977 636 1,613 2,249 MN 219 225 444 671 MT 291 195 486 691 ND 400 383 783 1,176 NE 177 72 249 321 NH 95 169 264 433 NJ 110 94 204 298 NV 86 152 238 402 NY 573 833 1,406 2,239 OH 542 446 988 1,434 OR 155 540 695 1,289 PA 487 813 1,300 2,115 RI 3 257 SD 195 196 391 591 UT 30 140 170 316 VA 506 581 1,087 1,671 VT 57 58 115 173 WA 65 596 661 1,330 WI 177 131 308 439 WV 351 700 1,051 1,754 WY 183 82 265 346 Subtotals 8327 8747 17074 26028

Canada 1 0 1 1

Destination Pending 34 31 65 97

Grand Total 28,397 32,099 60,496 93,317

Note that this data represents state of first destination and may not be final state of installation and occupancy.

Page 2 of 2
### §1738l. Encouraging multilateral debt donations

#### (a) Encouraging donations from official creditors

The President should actively encourage other official creditors of an eligible country to provide debt reduction to such eligible country.

#### (b) Encouraging donations from other sources

The President shall make every effort to insure that programs established through Environmental Funds are able to receive donations from private and public entities, and private creditors of the eligible country.

(July 10, 1954, ch. 469, title VI, §613, as added Pub. L. 101–624, title XV, §1512, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 3662.)
#### § 651.17 Environmental justice.

Executive Order 12898 (Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority and Low-Income Populations, 11 February 1994, 3 CFR, 1994 Comp., p. 859) requires the proponent to determine whether the proposed action will have a disproportionate impact on minority or low-income communities, both off-post and on-post.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ex rel.)

TREMAYNE CORA #B79855, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. ) No. 11 C 9230

)

MARCUS HARDY, )

)

Respondent. )

MEMORANDUM

This Court has received from the Clerk’s Office a photocopy

of the pro se communication that office had received on

February 21 from pro se habeas petitioner Tremayne Cora (“Cora”). 

In accordance with Cora’s request in that communication, a

photocopy of his 15-page Certified Statement of

Conviction/Disposition from the Circuit Court of Cook County has

been returned to him. In addition, this Court has been apprised

that the failure of his state post-conviction counsel Lee Boyd,

Jr. to have responded to this Court’s earlier directives was

attributable to the fact (obviously unknown both to Cora and to

this Court) that attorney Boyd had died recently.

In the meantime, counsel from the Illinois Attorney

General’s Office has advised that he is looking into the timing

questions about which this Court had been inquiring. As soon as

a report is forthcoming on that score, this Court will determine
the appropriate next steps to be taken in this action.

________________________________________

Milton I. Shadur

Senior United States District Judge

Date: February 24, 2012

2
* Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions

that have no precedential value and merely decide particular cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-50410 Conference Calendar

__________________ DAVID MEMPHIS CARTER, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus JAMES A. COLLINS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION, REBECKA L. BURKETT,
Defendants-Appellees,

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. W-94-CV-359

- - - - - - - - - - (October 18, 1995) Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and REAVLEY and SMITH, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * A Texas prison official denied inmate David Memphis Carter access to issues of a magazine depicting women engaged in sex with each other. This court has held that such a denial is not constitutionally infirm. Thompson v. Patteson , 985 F.2d 202, 206-07 (5th Cir. 1993). Carter has given us no reason to revisit or limit the holding of Thompson
.No. 95-50410 -2- The complaint of a person proceeding in forma pauperis (IFP) may be dismissed without service of process or discovery. Cay v. Estelle , 789 F.2d 318, 324 (5th Cir. 1989). The dismissal of Carter's complaint was not an abuse of discretion. See Eason v. Thaler , 14 F.3d 8, 9 (5th Cir. 1994). On motion for leave to appeal IFP, Carter has shown no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, we deny IFP and dismiss the appeal. See Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983); Carson v. Polley , 689 F.2d 562, 586 (5th Cir. 1982); 5th Cir. R. 42.2. We note that the district court imposed sanctions on Carter and that he does not challenge them on appeal. Issues not raised on appeal are abandoned. See Hobbs v. Blackburn , 752 F.2d 1079, 1083 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , 474 U.S. 838 (1985). IFP DENIED, APPEAL DISMISSED.
12.500 Scope of subpart. ( a ) As required by 41 U.S.C. 1906 and 1907, this subpart lists provisions of law that are not applicable to— ( 1 ) Contracts for the acquisition of commercial products or commercial services;
( 2 ) Subcontracts, at any tier, for the acquisition of commercial products or commercial services; and
( 3 ) Contracts and subcontracts, at any tier, for the acquisition of commercially available off-the-shelf (COTS) items.
( b ) This subpart also lists provisions of law that have been amended to eliminate or modify their applicability to either contracts or subcontracts for the acquisition of commercial products or commercial services.
[74 FR 2721, Jan. 15, 2009, as amended at 79 FR 24200, Apr. 29, 2014; 86 FR 61023, Nov. 4, 2021]
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual
Report on Form 10-K of Polydex Pharmaceuticals Limited (the Company) for the
fiscal year ended January 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, George G. Usher, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                  
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                
| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
      of the Company.

By /s/ George G. Usher George G. Usher, Chief
Executive Officer May 3, 2010

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

---
Exhibit 10.40.7



 







Exhibit 10.40.7




AMENDMENT TO

FEDERATED DEPARTMENT STORES, INC.

PROFIT SHARING 401(k) INVESTMENT PLAN




        The Federated Department Stores, Inc. Profit Sharing 401(k) Investment Plan (the “Plan”) is
hereby amended, effective as of the date that this document is signed, by adding a new Section
1.10.6 reading as follows to the end of Section 1.10 of the Plan.





          1.10.6 Notwithstanding any of the foregoing provisions of this Section 1.10,
any person who is, on any employee payroll of The May Department Stores Company
(for purposes of this Section 1.10.6, “May Company”) or a subsidiary thereof,
treated or classified as an employee of May Company or a subsidiary thereof
immediately prior to the effective date of the merger of May Company into a wholly
owned subsidiary of Federated shall not, at any time during the period that begins
on the effective date of such merger and ends on the next date on which he or she
no longer is an Employee, qualify as a Covered Employee for purposes of this Plan
(until, unless, and to the extent the provisions of this Section 1.10.6 are changed
or deleted by a further amendment to the Plan). For purposes of this Section
1.10.6, a “subsidiary” of May Company means any corporation, partnership, or other
organization other than May Company which is in a chain of corporations,
partnerships, and/or other organizations that begins with May Company and in which
at least 80% of the voting interests in such corporation, partnership, or other
organization in such chain (other than May Company) is owned by May Company or
another corporation, partnership, or other organization in such chain.



        IN ORDER TO EFFECT THE FOREGOING PLAN REVISION, the sponsor of the Plan hereby signs this Plan
amendment.




	 	 	 
	 

	 	FEDERATED DEPARTMENT STORES,
	 

	 	INC.
	 
	 	 
	 

	 	By: /s/ David W. Clark
	 
	 	 
	 

	 	Title: SVP Human Resources
	 
	 	 
	 

	 	Date: August 23, 2005
### §2009aa–13. Termination of authority

This subchapter and the authority provided under this subchapter expire on October 1, 2023.

(Pub. L. 87–128, title III, §382N, as added Pub. L. 106–554, §1(a)(4) [div. B, title V, §503], Dec. 21, 2000, 114 Stat. 2763, 2763A–281; amended Pub. L. 107–171, title VI, §6027(h), May 13, 2002, 116 Stat. 374; Pub. L. 110–234, title VI, 6025(b), May 22, 2008, 122 Stat. 1177; Pub. L. 110–246, §4(a), title VI, §6025(b), June 18, 2008, 122 Stat. 1664, 1939; Pub. L. 113–79, title VI, §6026(b), Feb. 7, 2014, 128 Stat. 850; Pub. L. 115–334, title VI, §6425(b), Dec. 20, 2018, 132 Stat. 4770.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Pub. L. 110–234 and Pub. L. 110–246 made identical amendments to this section. The amendments by Pub. L. 110–234 were repealed by section 4(a) of Pub. L. 110–246.

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–334 substituted "2023" for "2018".

2014—Pub. L. 113–79 substituted "2018" for "2012".

2008—Pub. L. 110–246, §6025(b), substituted "2012" for "2007".

2002—Pub. L. 107–171 substituted "2007" for "2002".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2008 Amendment

Amendment of this section and repeal of Pub. L. 110–234 by Pub. L. 110–246 effective May 22, 2008, the date of enactment of Pub. L. 110–234, see section 4 of Pub. L. 110–246, set out as an Effective Date note under section 8701 of this title.
Exhibit 99.2


                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection with the Quarterly Report of Ennis Business Forms,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending  November
30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission  on
the  date  hereof  (the "Report"), I, Robert  M.  Halowec,  Chief
Financial  Officer  of  the  Company,  certify,  pursuant  to  18
U.S.C.1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley  Act
of 2002, that:

 (1) The  Report fully complies with the requirements of  section
     13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 (2) The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,
     in  all  material  respects, the  financial  condition  and
     result of operations of the Company.


/s/ Robert M. Halowec

Robert M. Halowec
Chief Financial Officer
January 10, 2003
#### Susan S., Appellant, v Bernard W., Respondent.

Order of the Family Court, Nassau County, dated December 29, 1977 (upon an appeal by permission), affirmed, without costs or disbursements (see *Matter of Mau*reen E. O'H. v Nicholas C., 65 AD2d 491). Mollen, P. J., Latham, Damiani and Titone, JJ., concur.
NUMBER 13

- 11

- 00 445

- CR



### COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

- EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

CAMBPELL STEWART HEISS

, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

____________________________________________________________

On a ppeal from the 52nd District Court

of Coryell County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________



### MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Rodriguez, Vela, and Perkes

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Campbell Stewart Heiss , by and through his attorney, has filed a motion

to dismiss his appeal because he no longer desires to prosecute it. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P

.

42.2(a). Without passing on the merits of the case, we grant the motion to dismiss

pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a) and dismiss the appeal. Having2

dismissed the appeal at appellant's request, no motion for rehearing will be enterta ined,

and our mandate will issue forthwith. Any pending motions are dismissed as moot.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 47.2(b).

D elivered and filed 10th

day of November, 2011

.
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please 1 see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. 2 Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated 3 errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does 4 not include the filing date. 5 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 6 PEARL SALAZAR, 7 Worker-Appellee, 8

v. NO. 29,631 9 LAS VEGAS MEDICAL CENTER 10 and STATE OF NEW MEXICO 11 RISK MANAGEMENT, 12 Employer/Insurer-Appellants. 13
APPEAL FROM NEW MEXICO WORKERS’ COMPENSATION 14ADMINISTRATION 15 Gregory D. Griego , Workers’ Compensation Judge 16 James Rawley 17 Albuquerque, NM 18 for Appellee 19 Law Office of Hatcher & Tebo. P.A. 20 Scott P. Hatcher 21 Christopher J. Tebo 22 Santa Fe, NM 23 for Appellants 242 MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 WECHSLER, Judge. 2 Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of 3 proposed disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed, 4 and the time for doing so has expired. 5 Affirmed. 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. 7

______________________________ 8 JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge 9 10 WE CONCUR: 11

_______________________________ 12 CYNTHIA A. FRY, Chief Judge 13

_______________________________ 14 LINDA M. VANZI, Judge 15
Exhibit
32.1





Provectus
Pharmaceuticals, Inc.


Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350


Section
906 Certifications








Pursuant  to
18  U.S.C.  ss.  1350,  as  enacted  by  Section  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Public Law 107-204), the undersigned, H. Craig Dees,
Ph.D., the Chief Executive Officer of Provectus
Pharmaceuticals,  Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), and
Peter R. Culpepper, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify
that:





1.   The
Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2007, as
filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.   The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





This Certification is signed on March
20, 2008.








/s/ H. Craig
Dees


H. Craig Dees, Ph.D.


Chief Executive Officer


Provectus
Pharmaceuticals, Inc.





/s/ Peter R.
Culpepper


Peter
R. Culpepper


Chief Financial Officer


Provectus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.





A signed original of this
written  statement required by Section 906 has been
provided  to Provectus Pharmaceuticals,  Inc. and will be
retained by Provectus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
400 MARYLAND AVE., S.W., WASHINGTON, DC 20202

www.ed.gov

The Department of Education's mission is to promote student achievement and preparation for global competitiveness by

fostering educational excellence and ensuring equal access.

MEMORANDUM

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

OFFICE OF FINANCE AND OPERATIONS

Office of Acquisition, Grants, and Risk Management

TO: The Director, Grants Management Policy Division

FROM: The Deputy Assistant Secretary, Office of Acquisition, Grants, and Risk 

Management, Office of Finance and Operations 

SUBJECT: Redelegation of Authority to Approve and Issue Licenses and Obligation Authority

I. DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY

Under the authority vested in me by a delegation from the Acting Assistant Secretary, 

Office of Finance and Operations by delegation EK/EKG/220, certified on May 10, 2022, 

I hereby delegate to you, to perform the functions related to the management and oversight 

of the Department’s license holders and obligation authority process:

A. the authority to sign any decisions memos, congratulation letters and certificates

for new and updated licenses, and 

B. the authority to approve waivers if the individual does not have the required oneyear experience as outlined in the Discretionary Handbook. 

Unless otherwise noted in future delegations of authority, amendments to the authority 

delegatedin this document are included within the scope of this delegation. 

II. RESERVATIONS 

Unless otherwise noted in existing or future delegations of authority, the following are

not delegated: 

A. the authority to sign Federal Register notices; 

B. the authority to appoint, and fix compensation of, members of advisory councils; 

C. unless otherwise provided by law, the authority to submit reports to Congress or the

President; 

D. any authority reserved by law solely to the head of the agency without redelegation; 

and 
E. the authority to approve funding slates or sign Grant Award Notification letters.

III. REDELEGATION 

No further redelegation is authorized.

IV. CERTIFICATION AND EFFECTIVE DATE

This delegation is effective upon certification by the Department's Delegations Control

Officer and supersedes delegation EKG/EKGP/218 certified on June 10, 2021. I hereby 

ratify actions within the scope of this delegation taken by you prior to the date of 

certification.

 /s

Phillip Juengst 

OGC Clearance: Leah Travis; 5/9/2022 

Delegations Control Officer: Jim Clemmens

Date certified: 5/10/2022

Delegation Control Number: EKG/EKGP/224