alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §4503. Issuance of orders

#### (a) Notice and opportunity for public comment

During the period beginning with November 29, 1983, and ending thirty days after receipt of a proposal for an initial dairy products promotion and research order, the Secretary shall publish such proposed order and give due notice and opportunity for public comment upon the proposed order. The proposal for an order may be submitted by an organization certified under section 4505 of this title or by any interested person affected by the provisions of this subchapter.

#### (b) Effective date of orders

After notice and opportunity for public comment are given, as provided for in subsection (a) of this section, the Secretary shall issue a dairy products promotion and research order. Such order shall become effective not later than ninety days following publication of the proposal.

#### (c) Amendment of orders

The Secretary may, from time to time, amend a dairy products promotion and research order.

#### (d) Order implementation and international trade obligations

The Secretary, in consultation with the United States Trade Representative, shall ensure that the order is implemented in a manner consistent with the international trade obligations of the Federal Government.

(Pub. L. 98–180, title I, §112, Nov. 29, 1983, 97 Stat. 1137; Pub. L. 107–171, title I, §1505(g), May 13, 2002, 116 Stat. 209.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2002—Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 107–171, which directed the addition of subsec. (d) at the end of section 112 of the Dairy Promotion Stabilization Act of 1983, was executed by adding subsec. (d) at the end of this section to reflect the probable intent of Congress.
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
                                                                                           Exhibit 12(b)
PENNSYLVANIA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
            (Thousands of Dollars)
<CAPTION>
                                                  1995     1994(a)      1993       1992       1991
<S>                                            <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>
Fixed charges, as defined:
  Interest on long-term debt .................. $213,413   $214,390   $225,800   $240,260   $232,092
  Interest on short-term debt
     and other interest .......................   18,043     18,108     12,645     11,955     20,875
  Amortization of debt discount, expense
    and premium - net..........................    2,344      2,151      1,798      1,447      1,379
  Interest on capital lease
    obligations
      Charged to expense ......................   14,385     11,097      9,059     10,473     20,518
      Capitalized .............................    1,619      1,037        927      1,618      2,894
  Estimated interest component of
    operating rentals .........................    8,134      6,016      5,411      5,357      4,854
  Proportionate share of fixed charges
    of 50-percent-or-less-owned
    persons ...................................    1,014      1,142      1,299      1,456      1,567

          Total fixed charges ................. $258,952   $253,941   $256,939   $272,566   $284,179

Earnings, as defined:
  Net income .................................. $352,084   $243,443   $348,126   $346,724   $348,414
  Less undistributed income of less
    than 50-percent-owned persons ............                                                         -
                                                 352,084    243,443    348,126    346,724    348,414

Add (Deduct):
  Federal income taxes ........................  195,028    198,777    162,795    144,546    114,904
  State income taxes ..........................   62,388     76,903     63,508     64,648     49,534
  Deferred income taxes .......................   15,018    (45,198)    22,367     33,175     51,772
  Investment tax credit - net .................  (10,814)   (12,253)   (13,506)   (14,029)     1,156
  Income taxes on other income and
    deductions - net ..........................   25,410    (38,437)    (1,280)       322       (903)
  Amortization of capitalized
    interest on capital leases ................    5,510      9,271     11,696     12,820     16,965
  Total fixed charges as above
    (excluding capitalized interest
    on capital lease obligations) .............  257,333    252,904    256,012    270,948    281,285

          Total earnings ...................... $901,957   $685,410   $849,718   $859,154   $863,127

Ratio of earnings to fixed
  charges .....................................     3.48       2.70       3.31       3.15       3.04
<FN>
(a) Restated to reflect the retroactive dividend
    of PMDC to Resources.
</TABLE>
Exhibit 11


                 Exolon-ESK Company and Subsidiaries
                  Computation of Earnings Per Share
                (In Thousands, Except Per Share Data)

                                           Three Months
                                               Ended
                                             March 31,

                                           1998     1997

           Net earnings                   $1,197    $1,348
           Less Preferred Stock
           Dividends:

                Series A                     (5)       (5)

                Series B                     (5)       (5)
           Undistributed earnings         $1,187    $1,338

           Net earnings attributable
           to:

                Common Stock (50.0%)         593       669
                Class A Common Stock         594       669
                (50.0%)

                                          $1,187    $1,338

           Net earnings per share of            
           Common Stock:                   $1.23     $1.39
                Basic
                Diluted                    $1.19     $1.34

           Net earnings per share of
           Class A Common Stock:
                Basic                      $1.16     $1.30

                Diluted                    $1.12     $1.26

           Weighted Average Shares                        
           Outstanding:
                Basic:
                                         482,000   482,000
                Common Stock
                Class A Common Stock     513,000   513,000

                Diluted:

                Common Stock             504,000   504,000
                Class A Common Stock     535,000   535,000
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22

- 7356

DESTINED C. GEORGE , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. LT. MICHALEK; SGT. MOURING; CPT. LORD , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Richmond

. M. Hannah Lauck , District Judge. ( 3:19

- cv - 00155

- MHL

- MRC )

Submitted : April 25, 2023 Decided: April 28, 2023

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, THACKER , Circuit Judge , and MOTZ, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Destined C. M. D. George , Appellant Pro Se

.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 22-7356 Doc: 17 Filed: 04/28/2023 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM: Destined George, a Virginia inmate, filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against four correctional officers, including Defendant John Doe. The district court dismissed John Doe pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m), concluding that George failed to establish good cause for failure to timely serve him . As to the remaining Defendants, the district court ultimately accepted the magistrate judge’s recommendation s, dismissed George’s claims for failure
to exhaust his administrative remedies , and denied reconsideration

. Confining our review to the issues r aised in the informal brief , s ee 4th Cir. R. 34(b) ; Jackson v. Lightsey , 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues preserved in that
brief

. ”), we have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny George’s motion for a transcript at government expense, and we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED USCA4 Appeal: 22-7356 Doc: 17 Filed: 04/28/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
No. 757.

#### Empire Fuel Company *v.*J. E. Lyons.

March 22, 1920.

*Mr. Arthur S. Dayton, Mr. Melvin G. Sperry*and *Mr. Frank E. Wood*for petitioner.

*Mr. Murray Seasongood*for. respondent.

Petition for a writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE  SHEETS  AND  STATEMENTS  OF  OPERATIONS ON PAGES 3 - 8 OF THE COMPANY'S
MARCH  31,  1999 FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>     0000032880
<NAME>     ENERGY CORPORATION OF AMERICA
<MULTIPLIER>     1000
       
<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                          JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                            MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                        3316 
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                56514 
<ALLOWANCES>                                  1253 
<INVENTORY>                                    164 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             67196 
<PP&E>                                      445333 
<DEPRECIATION>                              121218 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              432943 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        89705 
<BONDS>                                     261028 
<COMMON>                                       721 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<OTHER-SE>                                   29977 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                432943 
<SALES>                                     237850 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            237850 
<CGS>                                       141620 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               217859 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             (1968)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           20078 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               1881 
<INCOME-TAX>                                  2069 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (195)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (195)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 (.30)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (.30)
        

</TABLE>
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 4, 2018

No. 04

- 18

- 00700

- CV

IN RE STEPHEN PATRICK BLACK,

From the 274th Judicial District Court, Guadalupe County, Texas

Trial Court No. CV

- 15

- 1805

Honorable Gary L. Steel, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Sitting: Marialyn P. Barnard, Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Relator’s motion to admit supplemental exhibits is granted.

It is so ORDERED on this 4th day of December, 2018

.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:

_______________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

Exhibit 10.14  


 
 

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TERMS    
    


        The following is a summary of the terms of the compensation package for Michael Batchelor in his position as Vice President, Canada. 



	•
	Annual
base salary of CDN$336,690.



	•
	Eligible
to participate in the Brand MIC Bonus Plan with a bonus of up to CDN$249,000.



	•
	Receipt
of a retention bonus equal to CDN$274,789 for each year of the first three full years Mr. Batchelor remains with Brand Services, Inc. Any unpaid
amounts will be fully payable immediately if employment is terminated by Brand for any reason other than for cause.



	•
	Receipt
of supplemental retention bonus of CDN$124,700 provided for each full or partial year of the first three years of Mr. Batchelor's employment with Brand
Services, Inc. In the event of a partial year of employment, the supplemental retention bonus will be prorated.



	•
	Eligible
to participate further in the Brand equity investment program, including:



	•
	receipt
of 92,610 Class C and C1 Units.



	•
	Of
this amount 12,965 Class C Units have a strike price of $10 per unit and vest on a time based schedule and will fully vest upon a change of control.



	•
	An
additional 39,822 Class C Units of this total number have a strike price of $10 per unit and vest on a company performance based schedule.



	•
	The
final 39,822 Class C1 Units of this total number have a strike price of $5 per unit and also vest on a performance based schedule.









	•
	Eligible
for relocation assistance.



	•
	Eligible
for exit bonus of CDN$100,000 at the end of three full years of employment.



	•
	Eligible
for the standard health, retirement and other benefits according to the current policy.



	•
	Eligible
for five weeks of vacation from the date of employment.



	•
	Eligible
for vehicle allowance of US$700 per month in accordance with Brand Services, Inc.'s policy.



	•
	If
employment is involuntarily terminated for any reason other than for cause, provided with 12 months of salary continuation at then current rate of pay as well as
medical and other insurance benefits being received at that time. 
















QuickLinks


SUMMARY COMPENSATION TERMS
#### 1252.239-87 Protection of Information at Rest.

As prescribed in 1239.7204(l), insert the clause as follows:

# Protection of Information at Rest and in Transit (NOV 2022)

The Contractor shall provide security mechanisms for handling data at rest and in transit in accordance with FIPS 140-2 ___ [*Contracting officer insert encryption standard, based on NIST FIPS 199 categorization*].

(End of clause)
#### In the Matter of Robert M. Neary, Appellant, et al., Intervenors-Petitioners, v. James E. Allen, as Commissioner of Education of the State of New York, Respondent, et al., Intervenors-Respondents.

Order affirmed, without costs, on the opinion of Mr. Justice MacAffer at Special Term (33 Misc 2d 548). Gibson, Herlihy, Reynolds and Taylor, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 24
                               PPL CORPORATION

                               2000 ANNUAL REPORT
                    TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                                  ON FORM 10-K

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY
                                -----------------

                The undersigned directors of PPL Corporation, a Pennsylvania
corporation, that is to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission,
Washington, D.C., under the provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended, its 2000 Annual Report on Form 10-K, do hereby appoint William F.
Hecht, John R. Biggar and Robert J. Grey their true and lawful attorney, and
each of them their true and lawful attorney, with power to act without the other
and with full power of substitution and resubstitution, to execute for them and
in their names said Form 10-K Report and any and all amendments thereto, whether
said amendments add to, delete from or otherwise alter said Form 10-K Report, or
add or withdraw any exhibits or schedules to be filed therewith and any and all
instruments in connection therewith. The undersigned hereby grant to said
attorneys and each of them full power and authority to do and perform in the
name of and on behalf of the undersigned, and in any and all capacities, any act
and thing whatsoever required or necessary to be done in and about the premises,
as fully and to all intents and purposes as the undersigned might do, hereby
ratifying and approving the acts of said attorneys and each of them.
<PAGE>

                IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have hereunto set their
hands and seals this 23rd day of February, 2001.


/s/  Frederick M. Bernthal         L.S.    /s/  William F. Hecht            L.S.
-----------------------------------        ---------------------------------
Frederick M. Bernthal                      William F. Hecht



/s/  John W. Conway                L.S.    /s/  Stuart Heydt                L.S.
-----------------------------------        ---------------------------------
John W. Conway                             Stuart Heydt



/s/  E. Allen Deaver               L.S.    /s/  Frank A. Long               L.S.
-----------------------------------        ---------------------------------
E. Allen Deaver                            Frank A. Long



/s/  William J. Flood               L.S.   /s/  W. Keith Smith              L.S.
------------------------------------       ---------------------------------
William J. Flood                              W. Keith Smith



/s/  Elmer D. Gates                L.S.
-----------------------------------
Elmer D. Gates
#### 1352.228-76 Approval of group insurance plans.

As prescribed in 48 CFR 1328.310-70(i), insert the following clause:

# Approval of Group Insurance Plans (APR 2010)

Under cost-reimbursement contracts, before buying insurance under a group insurance plan, the contractor shall submit the plan for approval to the Contracting Officer. Any change in benefits provided under an approved plan that can reasonably be expected to increase significantly the cost to the Government shall require similar approval.

(End of clause)

[75 FR 10570, Mar. 8, 2010; 75 FR 14496, Mar. 26, 2010]
<PAGE>   1

                                   EXHIBIT 21

Subsidiaries of UST Corp.*

  USTrust (7)
  United States Trust Company (1)
  Affiliated Community Bancorp, Inc. (1)
  Cambridge Trade Finance Corp. (1)
  Firestone Financial Corp. (2)
  Firestone Financial Canada Ltd. (3)
  UST Leasing Corporation (2)
  UST Capital Corp. (4)
  UST Auto Lease Corp. (2)
  Bra-Prop Corp. (2)
  UST Realty Trust, Inc. (6)

* Each of the above subsidiaries of UST Corp. is a Massachusetts Corporation
  or trust company. Other than USTrust which does business under the names
  of both USTrust and USTrust Bank, each of the above entities does business
  only under its corporate name. The foregoing list does not include the
  names of inactive subsidiaries or the names of subsidiaries of banking
  entities which subsidiaries have been organized to hold foreclosed
  property or to hold securities as a Massachusetts Securities Corporation.

(1)Wholly-owned by UST Corp.

(2)Wholly-owned by USTrust.

(3)Wholly-owned by Firestone Financial Corp.

(4)Wholly-owned by United States Trust Company.

(5)Wholly-owned by UST Securities Corp.

(6)Organized as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Bra-Prop Corp.

(7)Owned 76% by UST Corp. and 24% by Affiliated Community Bancorp, Inc.
,.EO Sr4,

)

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

REGION IX PRO1’

75 Hawthorne Street

San Francisco, CA 94105.3901

JUN 302014

Edie (‘hang. Deputy Executive Officer

California Air Resources Board

Post Office Box 2815

Sacrarnento. CA 95812

Dear ang:

On May 13, 2014, CARB submitted revisions to the California State Implementation Plan (SIP). We

have reviewed materials submitted with the following rule and found that it fulfills the completeness

criteria in 40 (‘FR Part 51, Appendix V.

APCD/AQMD RuIe# Rule Title

San Lois Obispo 220 Federal Prevention of Significant deterioration

We intend to address the other proposed SIP revisions in CARB’s May 13, 2014 submittal separately. In

the coming months we will review the complete revisions for action pursuant to Clean Air Act section

110(k).

Questions regarding our completeness review should be directed to Arnold Lazarus at (415) 972-3024.

Sincerely.

Dc orah Jordan

Director, Air Division

cc: Sent by e-mail

Larry R. Allen, Executive Officer, San Luis Obispo APCD

Mr. Michael (}uzzetta. Manager, Rule Evaluation Section, CARB

Printed on Recycled Paper
Case: 1:12-cv-00821 Document #: 13 Filed: 02/10/12 Page 1 of 6 PageID #:58
Case: 1:12-cv-00821 Document #: 13 Filed: 02/10/12 Page 2 of 6 PageID #:59
Case: 1:12-cv-00821 Document #: 13 Filed: 02/10/12 Page 3 of 6 PageID #:60
Case: 1:12-cv-00821 Document #: 13 Filed: 02/10/12 Page 4 of 6 PageID #:61
Case: 1:12-cv-00821 Document #: 13 Filed: 02/10/12 Page 5 of 6 PageID #:62
Case: 1:12-cv-00821 Document #: 13 Filed: 02/10/12 Page 6 of 6 PageID #:63
### §3242. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 106–78, title VII, §759, Oct. 22, 1999, 113 Stat. 1172, which related to education grants to Alaska Native serving institutions and Native Hawaiian serving institutions, was renumbered section 1419B of title XIV of Pub. L. 95–113, and amended by Pub. L. 110–234, title VII, §7112, May 22, 2008, 122 Stat. 1219, and Pub. L. 110–246, §4(a), title VII, §7112, June 18, 2008, 122 Stat. 1664, 1980, and was transferred to section 3156 of this title.
#### Charles Andrews, trading as Andrews Realty Company, appellant, v. George H. Heppe, appellee.

Gen. No. 29,502.

Suit by real estate broker to recover commissions upon the sale of real estate. Judgment for defendant. Appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. George B. Holmes, Judge, presiding. Heard in the second division of this court for the first district at the October term, 1924.

Reversed and judgment here for $5,400 with finding of facts.

Opinion filed March 3, 1925.

*626Mclnerney & Power, for appellant.

McMahon & Cheney, for appellee.

Mr. Presiding Justice Fitch

delivered the opinion of the court.