alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Equity OilCompany (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), I, Paul M. Dougan, Chief Executive Officer and President of theCompany, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,to the best of myknowledge and belief that:

 

(1)        Thereport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)        Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   |                                                    | /s/ Paul M. Dougan |   |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------|--------------------|--------|
|   | Paul M. Dougan, President  Chief Executive Officer |
|   | August 11, 2003                                    |

 

1

----

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Equity OilCompany (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), I, Russell V. Florence, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of theCompany, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,to the best of myknowledge and belief that:

 

(1)        Thereport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)        Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   |                                                    | /s/ Russell V. Florence |   |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|--------|
|   | Russell V. Florence  Treasurer  Chief Financial Officer |
|   | August 11, 2003                                    |

 

2

----
### §3321. Statement of purpose

It is the purpose of this subchapter to promote research and extension activities of the institutions hereinafter referred to in section 3322(b) of this title, and to coordinate their efforts as an integral part in the implementation of the National Aquaculture Act of 1980 (16 U.S.C. 2801 et seq.) by encouraging landowners, individuals, and commercial institutions to develop aquaculture production and facilities and sound aquacultural practices that will, through research and technology transfer programs, provide for the increased production and marketing of aquacultural food products.

(Pub. L. 95–113, title XIV, §1474, as added Pub. L. 97–98, title XIV, §1440(a), Dec. 22, 1981, 95 Stat. 1316.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The National Aquaculture Act of 1980, referred to in text, is Pub. L. 96–362, Sept. 26, 1980, 94 Stat. 1198, which is classified generally to chapter 48 (§2801 et seq.) of Title 16, Conservation. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 2801 of Title 16 and Tables.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Dec. 22, 1981, see section 1801 of Pub. L. 97–98, set out as a note under section 4301 of this title.
#### § 79.2 Applicability.

This part applies to the Office of the Secretary of Defense, the Military Departments, the Office of the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the Joint Staff, the Combatant Commands, the Office of the Inspector General of the Department of Defense, the Defense Agencies, the DoD Field Activities, and all other organizational entities within the DoD (hereinafter referred to collectively as the “DoD Components”).
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS, EASTERN DIVISION

HENRY ESPEJO, individually and on )

behalf of all others similarly situated, )

) Case No. 1:11-cv-8987

Plaintiff, ) Related to:Case No. 1:12-cv-4671

) Case No. 1:12-cv-9431

v. )

) Honorable Charles P. Kocoras

SANTANDER CONSUMER USA, INC., )

an Illinois corporation, )

)

Defendant. )

__________________________________________)

NOTICE OF MOTION

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on Tuesday, October 7th, 2014 at 9:30 a.m., or as soon 

thereafter as counsel may be heard, we shall appear before the Honorable Charles P. Kocoras, or 

any judge sitting in his stead in courtroom 2325 of the Everett McKinley Dirksen Building, 

United States Courthouse, 219 South Dearborn Street, Chicago, Illinois, and then and there 

present Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File an Enlarged Brief Instanter, a copy of which has 

been served upon you via the Court’s CM/ECF electronic filing system.

Respectfully submitted, 

HENRY ESPEJO, individually and on 

behalf of all others similarly situated,

Dated: September 24, 2014 By: s/ J. Dominick Larry

One of Plaintiff’s Attorneys

Jay Edelson

jedelson@edelson.com

Rafey S. Balabanian 

rbalabanian@edelson.com

Benjamin H. Richman 

brichman@edelson.com

J. Dominick Larry

nlarry@edelson.com

EDELSON PC

350 North LaSalle Street, Suite 1300

Chicago, Illinois 60654

Tel: 312.589.6370

Fax: 312.589.6378

Case: 1:11-cv-08987 Document #: 93 Filed: 09/24/14 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:1083
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on September 24, 2014, I served the above and foregoing by causing 

true and accurate copies of such paper to be filed and transmitted to all counsel of record via the 

Court’s CM/ECF system.

s/ J. Dominick Larry

Case: 1:11-cv-08987 Document #: 93 Filed: 09/24/14 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:1084
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Ex parte Matthew James Leachman

Appellate case numbers: 01-20-00841-CR, 01-20-00842-CR, 01-20-00843-CR

Trial court case numbers: 1694181, 1694180, 1694182

Trial court: 248th District Court of Harris County

On November 29, 2021, Appellant Matthew James Leachman filed a “Motion to Exceed 

Length Limit” with regard to his “further motion for en banc reconsideration.” Appellant’s 

motion is granted.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Veronica Rivas-Molloy

Acting individually 

Date: December 14, 2021
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2 CERTIFICATE OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. section 1350): I, Gregory J. Fisher, Chief Financial Officer of ElkCorp, certify to my knowledge and belief
pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. section 1350) that:  (1)
    The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2004, which
this statement accompanies, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)
    The information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period
ended December 31, 2004 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of ElkCorp. Dated:  February 8, 2005
    By
    /s/ Gregory J. FisherGregory J. FisherChief Financial Officer
#### 1246.101 Definitions.
# FILED

June 12,1998 Cecil W. Crowson Appellate Cou rt Clerk IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT NASHVILLE
CATHY P. SPRAYBERRY- ) GRAVITT, ) ) Plaintiff/Appell

ant, ) Appeal No.

) 01-A-01-9707-CH- 00295 v. ) ) Montgomery Chancery DAVID BAKER, Director of ) No. 95-08-0143 Schools for the CLARKSVILLE- ) MONTGOMERY COUNTY ) SCHOOLS and ) THE CLARKSVILLE- ) MONTGOMERY COUNTY ) BOARD OF EDUCATION, ) ) Defendants/Appel

lees. )

) 

## O R D E R
We have reviewed appellee's Pet ition to Rehear. C ounsel correctly points out

that the Education I

mprovemen

t Act of 1992 specified certain duties in the County Administration of education. The two sections cited [T. C.A. 49-2- 301(f)(10) and T.C.A. 49-2-203(a)(1)] do refe r to "recomm

endation" of the superintendent

to the local board of education. It is the duty of th e superintendent

to recomme

nd teachers who

qualify and the board "elects" such teachers to tenure status as it deems appropriate. It does not, however,

follow, as appell

ee contends, that th

e board i s powerless to elect a teache r to tenure if the sup

erintendent, throug

h intent or inadvertan c e, fails to recom mend their ele

ction. We do not be

lieve the legislature intended to strip the bo ard of this function. Accordingly, the petition is denied.

________________________________ HENRY F. TODD, PRESIDING JUDGE

__________

_________________________ BEN H. CANTRELL, JUDGE___________________ ________________ WALTE R W. BU SSART, SPECIAL JUDG E
#### George Donaldson, Appellant, v State of New York, Respondent.

(Appeal No. 1.)

Judgment unanimously affirmed, without costs, for the reasons stated in the decision of the Court of Claims, De Iorio, J. (Appeal from judgment of Court of Claims-negligence.) Present-Moule, J. P., Cardamone, Simons, Hancock, Jr., and Witmer, JJ.
### §455. Dissemination of crop, market, etc., information by cooperative marketing associations

Persons engaged, as original producers of agricultural products, such as farmers, planters, ranchmen, dairymen, nut or fruit growers, acting together in associations, corporate or otherwise, in collectively processing, preparing for market, handling, and marketing in interstate and/or foreign commerce such products of persons so engaged, may acquire, exchange, interpret, and disseminate past, present, and prospective crop, market, statistical, economic, and other similar information by direct exchange between such persons, and/or such associations or federations thereof, and/or by and through a common agent created or selected by them.

(July 2, 1926, ch. 725, §5, 44 Stat. 803.)
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T GE OR GE E . J AC OB S , I V, P la in tif

f - A p p e llan t, v. D IR E C T O R O F T H E C A L IF O RN IA D E P A R T M E N T O F C O R R E C T IO N S ; et a l., D efen d an t s - A p p el l ees. N o. 11- 15269 D. C . No . 1 : 0 9 - c v - 0 1 3 6 9 - L J OG BC ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e E a s te rn D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia L a w r e nc e J . O ’ N e i l l , D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d F e bruary21, 2012 ** B efo re: F E RN A N D E Z , M cK E O W N , an dB Y B E E , C i rcu i tJu d g es. G e or ge E . J a c obs , I V , aC a l i f orni as t a t e pr i s one r , appe a l s pr o s e f r om the di stri ctcourt ’ s j ud gm entdi sm i ss i ng hi s 42 U . S . C . § 1 98 3 act i on al l egi ng that 

# FI LED MA R 05 2012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS11- 15269 2 un autho ri ze d d educt i on s f rom hi s i nm at e trustac coun tfor pay m entof hi s c ou rt f ilin g f e e s v io la te dh is du e p r o c e s s r ig h ts . W e h a v e ju r is d ic tio n u n d e r2 8 U .S .C . § 1 2 9 1 . W e r e v ie w d e n o v o , N el so n v. H eiss , 27 1 F . 3d 89 1, 89 3 (9th C i r. 20 01 ), a n dw e a f

f i rm. T he di stri ctcourtprop er l y di sm i ss ed Ja cobs’ s a ct i on because J ac ob s had an a d e q u a te p o s t- d e p r iv a tio n r e m e d yu n d e rC a lif o rn ialaw . See H

ud son v. P alm er , 4 6 8 U .S . 5 1 7 , 5 3 3 ( 1 9 8 4 ) ( “[ A ]n u n au th o r iz e din te n tio n a l d e p r iv a tio n o f p r o p e rty b yas ta te e m p lo y e e d o e s n o t c o n s titu te av io la tio n o f th e p r o c e du r a l r e q u ir e m e n ts of the D ue P r oc e s s C l aus e of the F ourt e e nth A m e ndm e nti f am e ani ngf

ul po st depri vat i on re m edy f or the l oss i s avai l abl e. ”) ; B arne t t v . C e ntoni , 31 F . 3d 813, 8 1 6 - 1 7 ( 9 th C ir . 1 9 9 4 ) ( p e rc u r ia m ) ( “C a lif o rn ia[ l]a w p r o v id e s a n a d e q u a te p o s t- d e p r iv a tio n r e m e d yf o ra n yp r o p e rtyd e p r iv a tio n s .” ( c i t i ng C a l . G ov’ tC ode §§ 81 0-89 5)). J a c obs ’ s r e que s tf

orj udi c i a l not i c e i s de ni e d. Ja cobs’ s r em ai ni ng cont ent i on s are un pers uasi ve. AF F I RME D.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

April 28, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver 131670(71) Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, TIMOTHY JORDAN, Personal Justices Representative of the Estate of Sandra Jordan, Deceased, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 131670 COA: 259224 Monroe CC: 04-017775-NH MERCY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, DAVID EUGENE SZYMANSKI, M.D., and SYED HASSAN, M.D., Defendants-Appellees.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the motion for rec onsideration of this Court’s December 14, 2007 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was entered erroneously.

d0421 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

April 28, 2008

Clerk
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

THURMAN ROSS, by and on behalf of himself and 

all others similarly situated,

Plaintiff,

vs.

CAREER EDUCATION CORPORATION, GARY 

E. McCULLOUGH, and MICHAEL J. GRAHAM,

Defendants.

Civil Action No. 12 C 276

Hon. John W. Darrah

ORDER AWARDING ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND EXPENSES

THIS MATTER having come before the Court on the motion of Lead Plaintiffs for an 

award of attorneys’ fees and expenses; the Court, having considered all papers filed and 

proceedings conducted herein, having found the settlement of the Action to be fair, reasonable, 

and adequate and otherwise being fully informed in the premises and good cause appearing 

therefore;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that:

1. The Court hereby awards Lead Counsel attorneys’ fees of 25% of the Settlement 

Fund and expenses of $416,756.72, together with the interest earned thereon for the same time 

period and at the same rate as that earned on the Settlement Fund until paid. Said fees shall be 

allocated among Lead Plaintiffs’ counsel by Lead Counsel in a manner which, in their good-faith 

judgment, reflects each counsel’s contribution to the institution, prosecution, and resolution of 

the Litigation. 

1

Case: 1:12-cv-00276 Document #: 132 Filed: 05/01/14 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:3077
2. The Court further finds that the amount of fees awarded is fair and reasonable 

considering, among other things that:

(a) the requested fee is consistent with percentage fees negotiated ex ante in 

the private market for legal services;

(b) the contingent nature of the Action favors a fee award of 30%, in accord 

with Seventh Circuit authority, which is more than the fee requested (and here awarded) of 25%;

(c) the Settlement Fund of $27.5 million was not likely at the outset of the 

Action;

(d) the quality legal services provided by Lead Counsel produced the 

settlement;

(e) the Lead Plaintiffs appointed by the Court to represent the Class reviewed 

and approved the requested fee;

(f) the stakes of the litigation favor the fee awarded; and,

(g) no absent Class Members objected to the fee award.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: 5/1/14 __________________________________________

THE HONORABLE JOHN W. DARRAH

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2

Case: 1:12-cv-00276 Document #: 132 Filed: 05/01/14 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:3078
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

About EDOVERVIEW

*Note:  These Congressional Budget Justifications do not include State tables. For the latest State tables, please visit the Department's State Tables page*.Volume I- Education for the Disadvantaged  PDF (1.4MB) 
- Impact Aid   PDF (1.2MB)
- School Improvement Programs  PDF (2.0MB)
- Safe Schools and Citizenship Education  PDF (2.0MB)
- Indian Education  PDF (1.2MB)  ****)
- Innovation and Improvement  PDF (1.9MB)
- English Language Acquisition  PDF (622KB)
- Special Education  PDF (1.6MB)
- Rehabilitation Services  PDF (1.9MB)
Volume II- American Printing House for the Blind  PDF (73KB)
- National Technical Institute for the Deaf  PDF (172KB)
- Gallaudet University  PDF (228KB)
- Career, Technical, and Adult Education  PDF (1.4MB)
- Student Aid Overview  PDF (232KB)
- Student Financial Assistance  PDF (1.8MB)
- TEACH Grants  PDF (1.0MB)
- Student Loans Overview  PDF (1.2MB)
- Higher Education  PDF (2.7MB)
- Howard University  PDF (222KB)
- College Housing and Academic Facilities Loans Program Account  PDF (162KB)
- Historically Black College and University Capital Financing Program Account  PDF (301KB)
- Institute of Education Sciences  PDF (675KB)
- Salaries and Expenses Overview  PDF (553KB)
- Program Administration  PDF (1.4MB)
- Student Aid Administration  PDF (1.4MB)
- Office for Civil Rights  PDF (474KB)
- Office of Inspector General  PDF (343KB)
- Information Technology System Modernization and Working Capital  PDF (343KB)
   Printable view  Last Modified: 03/13/2019
How Do I Find...- Student loans, forgiveness
- College accreditation
- Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
- FERPA
- FAFSA
- 1098, tax forms

More >
Information About...- Transforming Teaching
- Family and Community Engagement
- Early Learning

 
President's Education Budget RequestBudget TablesBudget NewsED Budget Process and Calendar
*Our mission* is to promote student achievement and preparation for global competitiveness by fostering educational excellence and ensuring equal access.
Student Loans
Repaying LoansDefaulted LoansLoan ForgivenessLoan Servicers
Grants & Programs
Apply for Pell GrantsGrants ForecastApply for a GrantEligibility for Grants
Laws & Guidance
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)FERPACivil RightsNew IDEA Website
Data & Research
Education StatisticsPostsecondary Education DataED Data ExpressNation's Report CardWhat Works Clearinghouse
About Us
Contact UsED OfficesJobsPress ReleasesFAQsRecursos en españolBudget, PerformancePrivacy ProgramSubscribe to E-Mail Updates- Notices
- FOIA
- Privacy Policy
- Accessibility
- Security
- Information quality
- Inspector General
- Whitehouse.gov
- USA.gov
- Benefits.gov
- Regulations.gov
### §427i. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 427i was editorially reclassified as section 3105 of this title.
### §4904. Notice and hearings

(a) When sufficient evidence, as determined by the Secretary, is presented to the Secretary by watermelon producers, handlers, and importers, or whenever the Secretary has reason to believe that a plan will tend to effectuate the declared policy of this chapter, the Secretary shall give due notice and opportunity for a hearing on a proposed plan. Such hearing may be requested by watermelon producers, handlers, or importers or by any other interested person, including the Secretary, when the request for such hearing is accompanied by a proposal for a plan.

(b) After notice and opportunity for hearing as provided in subsection (a) of this section, the Secretary shall issue a plan if the Secretary finds, and sets forth in such plan, on the evidence introduced at the hearing that the issuance of the plan and all the terms and conditions thereof will tend to effectuate the declared policy of this chapter.

(Pub. L. 99–198, title XVI, §1645, Dec. 23, 1985, 99 Stat. 1623; Pub. L. 103–189, §8(c), Dec. 14, 1993, 107 Stat. 2261.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1993—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 103–189 substituted ", handlers, and importers" for "and handlers" and ", handlers, or importers" for "or handlers".
### §253. Public information

#### (a) In general

The Secretary may release to the public the names, addresses, and locations of all persons—

(1) that have been licensed under this chapter or that have been approved to engage in an activity under this chapter; and

(2) with respect to which a license or approval has been suspended or revoked under section 252 of this title, the results of any investigation made or hearing conducted under this chapter, including the reasons for the suspension or revocation.

#### (b) Confidentiality

Except as otherwise provided by law, an officer, employee, or agent of the Department shall not divulge confidential business information obtained during a warehouse examination or other function performed as part of the duties of the officer, employee, or agent under this chapter.

(Aug. 11, 1916, ch. 313, pt. C, §14, as added Pub. L. 106–472, title II, §201, Nov. 9, 2000, 114 Stat. 2068.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 253, acts Aug. 11, 1916, ch. 313, pt. C, §12, 39 Stat. 487; Feb. 23, 1923, ch. 106, 42 Stat. 1283; Mar. 2, 1931, ch. 366, §7, 46 Stat. 1464, related to suspension and revocation of license to classify, grade, or weigh, prior to the general amendment of this chapter by Pub. L. 106–472. See section 252 of this title.

A prior section 14 of act Aug. 11, 1916, ch. 313, pt. C, was classified to section 255 of this title, prior to the general amendment of this chapter by Pub. L. 106–472.