alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Philip McCall, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County, rendered October 26, 1962 after a jury trial, convicting him of operating a policy business (Penal Law, § 974-a) and of the possession of policy slips (Penal Law, § 975) and imposing sentence. Judgment affirmed. The evidence warranted the conviction (cf. *People*V. *Hines,*284 N. Y. 93, 104-105; *People*v. *Wolosky,*296 N. Y. 236, 238; *People*v. *Persce,*204 N. Y. 397, 402). The indictment was a simplified indictment and complied with the requirements specified in sections 295-b, 295-e and 295-d of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Therefore, it may not be held that the count of the indictment *631charging defendant with the crime of possession of policy slips, contrary to section 975 of the Penal Law, was defective because it did not allege specifically that defendant was not a public officer. If proof on the trial were required as to whether defendant was or was not a public officer, he had the burden of proving that he was a public officer *(People*v. *Bradford,*227 N. Y. 45, 48; *People*v. *IPAmato,*12 A D 2d 439, 445). The motions during the trial: (a) for a declaration that the search warrant was improperly issued and executed, and (b) for the suppression of the evidence seized under the search warrant, were properly denied *(People*v. *Massey,*38 Mise 2d 403; *People*V. *Montanaro,*34 Mise 2d 624; Code Grim. Pro., § 813-d). Assuming *arguendo*that a motion to vacate a search warrant and for the return and the suppression of evidence may be made pursuant to sections 813-e, 813-d and 813-e of the Code of Criminal Procedure, irrespective of whether any motions were made to vacate the search warrant and for the restoration of property pursuant to sections 807 and 809 of the Code of Criminal Procedure *(People*v. *Montanaro, supra),*nevertheless, no motions may be made during the trial to vacate a search warrant and for the return and suppression of evidence, unless the motion comes within the exceptions prescribed by section 813-d of the Code of Criminal Procedure (also, see, Code Grim. Pro., §§ 518, 518-a). The defendant did not come within such exceptions. Beldoek, P. J., tlghetta, Brennan, Hill and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 4, 2019

p1001 

# Order

Clerk October 4, 2019

159415 & (24)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 159415

COA: 346169

St. Clair CC: 13

- 001620

- FC

MICHAEL SHAWN POOLE,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 28, 2019

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). The

motion to remand is DENIED.
UNITED STATES OFFICE OF 

GOVERNMENT ETHICS 

* 

The Honorable Rod J. Rosenstein 

Deputy Attorney General 

U.S. Department of Justice 

950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20530-0001 

Dear Mr. Rosenstein, 

May 16, 2018 

I write to you in connection with the complaint by Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics 

in Washington on March 8, 2018 with the Department of Justice (DOJ) and with the U.S. Office 

of Government Ethics (OGE). Specifically, the complaint requested that DOJ and OGE 

investigate whether a payment made by Mr. Michael Cohen to a third party constituted a loan to 

President Trump that should have been reported as a liability on his public financial disclosure 

report signed on June 14, 2017 (for calendar year 2016), and if so, whether the failure to report it 

was knowing and willful. 

Today I certified President Trump 's financial disclosure report signed on May 15, 2018 

(for calendar year 2017). OGE has concluded that, based on the information provided as a note to 

part 8, the payment made by Mr. Cohen is required to be reported as a liability. OGE has 

determined that the information provided in that note meets the disclosure requirements for a 

reportable liability under the Ethics in Government Act. 

I am providing both reports to you because you may find the disclosure relevant to any 

inquiry you may be pursuing regarding the President's prior report that was signed on 

June 14, 2017. 

Sincerely, 

~/.~ David J. Apol 

Acting Director 

1201 NEW YORK AVE NW· SUITE 500 ·WASHINGTON DC· 20005 * * * *
Exhibit 10.36


AMENDMENT
NUMBER TWO

TO THE

NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE, INC.

CAPITAL ACCUMULATION PLAN


WHEREAS, New York Stock Exchange, Inc. (“NYSE”)
maintains the New York Stock Exchange, Inc. Capital Accumulation Plan,
effective January 1, 1998 (the “Plan”).


WHEREAS, NYSE may amend the Plan by action of
its board of directors (the “Board”) or a person designated by the Board; and


WHEREAS, the Board deems it advisable to amend
the Plan.


NOW,
THEREFORE,
pursuant to Section 16 of the Plan, the Plan is hereby amended, effective May
1, 2001, as follows:


1.             Section 1(p) is amended by adding
the following sentence at the end thereof:


“Notwithstanding the
foregoing, effective May 1, 2001, “Performance Award” shall mean only the ICP
Award.”


2.             The first paragraph of Section 2(a)
is deleted in its entirety.


3.             The second paragraph of Section
2(a) is amended to read as follows:


“Notwithstanding any
provision in the Plan to the contrary, no book entry contributions shall be
made by the NYSE to a Participant’s Accumulation Account with respect to a
Participant’s LTIP Award after May 1, 2001.


NYSE shall make book
entry contributions to the Accumulation Account of a Participant equal to the
Participant’s ICP Award multiplied by the percentage set forth on Exhibit B
corresponding to the Participant’s name.”


4.             Section 3(a) of the Plan is amended
by adding the following at the end thereof:


 

















 


“Notwithstanding the
foregoing, effective May 1, 2001, the portion of a Participant’s Accumulation
Account attributable to book entry contributions credited after May 1, 2001 and
Earnings thereon shall become vested based on the Participant’s age while
continuously employed by the NYSE, as follows:


	
  AGE

  	
   

  	
  % Vested

  	
   

  
	
  Younger than 55

  	
   

  	
  0

  	
  %

  
	
  55 but younger than 56

  	
   

  	
  10

  	
  %

  
	
  56 but younger than 57

  	
   

  	
  20

  	
  %

  
	
  57 but younger than 58

  	
   

  	
  30

  	
  %

  
	
  58 but younger than 59

  	
   

  	
  50

  	
  %

  
	
  59 but younger than 60

  	
   

  	
  70

  	
  %

  
	
  60 and older

  	
   

  	
  100

  	
  %

  



 


5.             Effective May 1, 2001, Exhibit A of
the Plan is amended to include the following additional individuals as
Participants in the Plan:  Frank Z.
Ashen, Richard P. Bernard, Noreen M. Culhane, David P. Doherty, Richard A.
Edgar, Salvatore Pallante, and Robert T. Zito.


6.             Effective May 1, 2001, the Plan is
amended by adding a new Exhibit B at the end thereof in the form attached
hereto.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this Amendment to be executed
this 13th day of August, 2001.


	
   

  	
  NEW
  YORK STOCK EXCHANGE, INC.

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  /s/ Frank Z.
  Ashen

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Dated:

  	
  8/13/01

  



 


Frank Z. Ashen

Executive Vice President

Human Resources


 


-2-
UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549



FORM 6-K



REPORT OF FOREIGN PRIVATE ISSUER

PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-16 OR 15d-16 UNDER

THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934



For the month of July 2007



Commission File Number 1-14728



Lan Airlines S.A.

(Translation of registrant's name into English)



Presidente Riesco 5711, Piso 20

Las Condes

Santiago, Chile

(Address of principal executive office)



Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports under cover Form 20-F or Form 40-F.

Form 20-FXForm 40-F

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1):

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7):

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the information contained in this Form is also thereby furnishing the information to the Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

YesNoX

If Yes is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the registrant in connection with Rule 12g3-2(b): 82-





---



RELEVANT FACT



Santiago, July 12, 2007



Mr.

Guillermo Larraín Ríos

Superintendent

Superintendence of Securities and Insurance

Present



To whom it may concern:



Pursuant to Article 9 and paragraph 2 of Article 10 of Law No. 18.045, I hereby inform you of the relevant fact that the Board of Directors of LAN Airlines S.A. today authorized the incorporation into its long-haul float of 32 Boeing 787 aircraft to be delivered between 2011 and 2016. Of the 32 aircraft, 26 shall be purchased and 6 shall be leased. The incorporation of these aircraft will represent a total investment of approximately US$3,200 million. In addition, the Board of Directors approved the exercise of 10 options to purchase the same type of aircraft during 2017 and 2018.



Sincerely,



/s/ Enrique Cueto Plaza

Enrique Cueto Plaza

Executive Vicepresident

Lan Airlines S.A.







---







SIGNATURE



Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.



Date: July 13, 2007





| | Lan Airlines S.A.                                                           
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | /s/ Andrés del Valle
      Andrés del Valle
      Corporate Finance Director
### §57. Disposition of proceeds of sale of cotton and of copies of standards

Any moneys received from or in connection with the sale of cotton purchased for the preparation of the copies mentioned in section 56 of this title and condemned as unsuitable for such use or with the sale of such copies may be expended for the purchase of other cotton for such use.

(Mar. 4, 1923, ch. 288, §6(a), formerly §6, 42 Stat. 1518; renumbered §6(a), Sept. 21, 1944, ch. 412, §401(b), 58 Stat. 738.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section is composed of the last sentence of subsec. (a) of section 6 of act Mar. 4, 1923, as renumbered by section 401(b) of act Sept. 21, 1944. First five sentences of subsec. (a) of section 6 is classified to section 56 of this title. Subsec. (b) of section 6 is classified to section 57a of this title.
### §2115. Investigations by Secretary; subpenas; oaths and affirmations; judicial aid

The Secretary may make such investigations as he deems necessary for the effective carrying out of his responsibilities under this chapter or to determine whether a handler or any other person has engaged or is about to engage in any acts or practices which constitute or will constitute a violation of any provision of this chapter or of any order, or rule or regulation issued under this chapter. For the purpose of any such investigation, the Secretary is empowered to administer oaths and affirmations, subpena witnesses, compel their attendance, take evidence, and require the production of any books, papers, and documents which are relevant to the inquiry. Such attendance of witnesses and the production of any such records may be required from any place in the United States. In case of contumacy by, or refusal to obey a subpena issued to, any person, including a handler, the Secretary may invoke the aid of any court of the United States within the jurisdiction of which such investigation or proceeding is carried on, or where such person resides or carries on business, in requiring the attendance and testimony of witnesses and the production of books, papers, and documents; and such court may issue an order requiring such person to appear before the Secretary, there to produce records, if so ordered, or to give testimony touching the matter under investigation. Any failure to obey such order of the court may be punished by such court as a contempt thereof. All process in any such case may be served in the judicial district whereof such person is an inhabitant or wherever he may be found.

(Pub. L. 89–502, §16, July 13, 1966, 80 Stat. 285; Pub. L. 91–452, title II, §206(a), Oct. 15, 1970, 84 Stat. 929.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1970—Pub. L. 91–452 struck out designation "(a)" preceding first sentence and struck out subsec. (b) which related to immunity from prosecution of any individual compelled to testify or produce evidence, documentary or otherwise, after claiming his privilege against self-incrimination.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1970 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 91–452 effective on sixtieth day following Oct. 15, 1970, and not to affect any immunity to which any individual is entitled under this section by reason of any testimony given before sixtieth day following Oct. 15, 1970, see section 260 of Pub. L. 91–452, set out as an Effective Date; Savings Provision note under section 6001 of Title 18, Crimes and Criminal Procedure.
#### Nedra C. Baker *v.*Carleton B. Baker

*Paul W. Orth,*for the appellee (plaintiff).

*Wesley W. Horton,*for the appellant (defendant).

Argued December 3

decided December 3, 1974

The plaintiff’s motion to dismiss the appeal from the Superior Court in Hartford County is denied.
#### In the Matter of Bernard Dobosen, Doing Business as The Towers, Petitioner, v. Martin C. Epstein et al., Constituting the New York State Liquor Authority, Respondents.

Determination unanimously confirmed, without costs. Memorandum: The record contains substantial evidence to support the Authority’s determination. This proceeding is clearly distinguishable from the fact situation present in *Matter of 245 Elmwood Ave.*v. *New York State Liq. Auth.*(14 A D 2d 393, affd. 11 N Y 2d 980). In that case we found that the Hearing Commissioner, despite repeated efforts on the part of the petitioner’s attorney, refused to allow any questions relating to the character of the Authority’s only witness and violated all of “the ordinary rules relating to the eredibilty of witnesses [which] must be observed” (p. 395). In the instant appeal petitioner’s attorney asked one question relating to the legitimacy of the witness’ child, which was properly excluded, and made no further effort to question the witness’ character or credibility. Under these circumstances the Gommissioner’s determination must be confirmed. (Review of determination of respondents suspending for 10 days the restaurant liquor license of petitioner, transferred by order of Erie Special Term.) Present — Bastow, J. P., Goldman, Halpern, McClusky and Henry, JJ.
### §589. Definitions

When used in this chapter—

(1) The term "person" includes individuals, partnerships, corporations, and associations.

(2) The term "Secretary of Agriculture" means the Secretary of Agriculture of the United States.

(3) Except as provided herein, the term "foreign commerce" means commerce between any State, or the District of Columbia, and any place outside of the United States or its possessions.

(4) The term "apples" means fresh whole apples, whether or not the apples have been in storage.

(5) The term "bulk container" means a container that contains a quantity of apples weighing more than 100 pounds.

(June 10, 1933, ch. 59, §9, 48 Stat. 124; Pub. L. 106–96, §1(b), Nov. 12, 1999, 113 Stat. 1321; Pub. L. 113–79, title X, §10009(b), Feb. 7, 2014, 128 Stat. 949.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2014—Par. (5). Pub. L. 113–79 added par. (5).

1999—Par. (4). Pub. L. 106–96 added par. (4) and struck out former par. (4) which read as follows: "The term 'apples and/or pears' means fresh whole apples or pears, whether or not they have been in storage."
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-19-00053-CV

HAMPTON ROADS LANDSCAPING 

& LAWN CARE, LLC AND MARK TAYLOR,

Appellants

v.

THE GROUNDS GUYS, LLC,

Appellee

From the 74th District Court

McLennan County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018-2319-3

ORDER

Appellants’ Motion to Substitute Counsel was filed on April 16, 2019. There is no 

indication in the Court’s file, the clerk’s record, or the reporter’s record that Christopher 

D. Kratovil or the law firm of Dykema Gossett, PLLC has made an appearance in this 

appeal. Accordingly, the motion to substitute is denied.

However, because L. Hayes Fuller, III, Robert Little, and the law firm of Naman 

Howell Smith & Lee, PLLC have made an appearance in this appeal by way of the motion 
Hampton Roads Landscaping & Lawn Care, LLC v. The Grounds Guys, LLC Page 2

to substitute, L. Hayes Fuller, III, Robert Little, and the law firm of Naman Howell Smith 

& Lee, PLLC will be added as additional counsel for appellants. We note that the lead 

counsel designation has not changed.

PER CURIAM

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Neill

Motion denied.

Order issued and filed May 1, 2019
Regulator·y Evaluation 

Docke l No. FAAt.otrf-AJM- 2cf6 ~.:D Directorate Identifier: -AD 

((mu make clumy,c:s to the l'alue.\ in the tohle hf!Low. you til/IS/ c!/1.\llre the totals uedute (l(;cordillgly. (/ 

til<'! " do not, dick for To/') illf() unclth<!ll ow oft he dumg<!d cell. 

Estimated Costs: 

Action Costs per Prod uct (e.g., aircran, engine, 

(e.g., Inspection, propeller, appliance) 

replacement) Work-hours Labor Parts Cost Total Costs Number of Total Cost 

Do not include on- (include cost (labor + u.s. for U.S. Fleet 

COIIditiOII COSIS here access, testing, (@$85/h parts) Registered 

and close-up) our) Prod ucts 

-R-e-to rtttJe-o t.:..bo Its-- Jlj $0 ___ -- -- _l2.<L--

')(\'\IX c..i-j {j) 1.... 2.. <1; if)l1-~ --1>~ L~ -/A 2..1 2..<10 ((~ -1-0rt1.u ~ ,_c hnlt'\ ~ J~S Jt a 

0 

The known numbe r o f products in compliance: 0 

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $32, 130 

Costs covered unde r warranly Of known) $0 

On-Condition Costs: 

Action Work-hours Labor cost Parts Cost Cost per Product 

(e.g., Inspection. (include access, (@$85/hour) 

replacement) testing, and closeup) 

$0 

Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field 10 explain any1hing in the Estimated Costs table 

that was assumed or mightnol be obvious. Thisjield can also be used to explainwarramy cosls) : 
Executive Ot·det· 12866: 

Could the AD be considered a "significant regulatory action"? ~ 

YES* D NO [g) 

*Explanation: 

DOT Rcgulatot·y Policies and Procedures: 

Is the AD significant? G 

YES* D NO [g) 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act: 

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No answer. 8 

YES D NO [g) 

Explanation: 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska: 

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? 

YES* D NO [g) 

*Explanation:
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 6 (Monday, January 11, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1966-1967]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-00377]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

TIME AND DATE: Thursday, January 14, 2021, 1:00 p.m. Eastern Time.

PLACE: Because of the COVID-19 pandemic, the meeting will be held as an 
audio-only conference. The public may listen to the audio-only 
conference by following the instructions that will be posted on 
www.eeoc.gov 24 hours before the meeting. Closed captioning services 
will be available.

STATUS: A portion of the meeting will be open to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 
    The following items will be considered at the meeting's open 
session:

Resolution Concerning the Commission's Authority to Commence or 
Intervene in Litigation
Revised Procedures for Commission Approval of Amicus Curiae 
Participation

    The following item will be considered at the meeting's closed 
session:

Recommendation to participate as amicus curiae

    The Legal Counsel has certified that, in his opinion, the portion 
of the Commission meeting scheduled for January 14, 2021 concerning 
participation as amicus curiae may properly be closed under the 10th 
exemption to the Government in the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(10), 
and Commission regulation at 29 CFR 1612.4(j).
    Note: In accordance with the Sunshine Act, the public will be able 
to listen to the Commission's deliberations and voting in the open 
session. (In addition to publishing notices on EEOC Commission meetings 
in the Federal Register, the Commission also provides information about 
Commission meetings on its website, www.eeoc.gov, and provides a 
recorded announcement a

[[Page 1967]]

week in advance on future Commission meetings.)
    Please telephone (202) 663-7100 (voice) or (202) 921-2750, or email 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#92f1fdfffffbe1e1fbfdfcfff7f7e6fbfcf5f1fdfffff7fce6e1d2f7f7fdf1bcf5fde4"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="03606c6e6e6a70706a6c6d6e6666776a6d64606c6e6e666d77704366666c602d646c75">[email protected]</span></a> at any time for information on this 
meeting.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Rachel V. See, Acting Executive 
Officer, (202) 921-2545.

    Dated: January 7, 2021.
Rachel V. See,
Acting Executive Officer, Executive Secretariat.
[FR Doc. 2021-00377 Filed 1-7-21; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6570-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>