alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §519. Treatment of tobacco loan pool stocks and outstanding loan costs

#### (a) Disposal of stocks

To provide for the orderly disposition of quota tobacco held by an association that has entered into a loan agreement with the Commodity Credit Corporation under section 106A or 106B of the Agricultural Act of 1949 (7 U.S.C. 1445–1, 1445–2) (referred to in this section as an "association"), loan pool stocks for each kind of tobacco held by the association shall be disposed of in accordance with this section.

#### (b) Disposal by associations

For each kind of tobacco held by an association, the association shall be responsible for the disposal of a specific quantity of the loan pool stocks for that kind of tobacco held by the association. The quantity transferred to the association for disposal shall be equal to the quantity determined by dividing—

(1) the amount of funds held by the association in the No Net Cost Tobacco Fund and the No Net Cost Tobacco Account established under sections 106A and 106B of the Agricultural Act of 1949 (7 U.S.C. 1445–1, 1445–2) for the kind of tobacco; by

(2) the average list price per pound for the kind of tobacco, as determined by the Secretary.

#### (c) Disposal of remainder by Commodity Credit Corporation

#### (1) Disposal

Any loan pool stocks of a kind of tobacco of an association that are not transferred to the association under subsection (b) for disposal shall be disposed of by Commodity Credit Corporation in a manner determined by the Secretary.

#### (2) Reimbursement

As required by section 518e(b)(1)(B) of this title, the Secretary shall transfer from the Tobacco Trust Fund to the No Net Cost Tobacco Fund or the No Net Cost Tobacco Account of an association established under section 106A or 106B of the Agricultural Act of 1949 (7 U.S.C. 1445–1, 1445–2) such amounts as the Secretary determines will be adequate to reimburse the Commodity Credit Corporation for any net losses that the Corporation may sustain under its loan agreements with the association.

#### (d) Transfer of remaining no net cost funds

Any funds in the No Net Cost Tobacco Fund or the No Net Cost Tobacco Account of an association established under sections 106A and 106B of the Agricultural Act of 1949 (7 U.S.C. 1445–1, 1445–2) that remain after the application of subsections (b) and (c) shall be transferred to the association for distribution to producers of quota tobacco in accordance with a plan approved by the Secretary.

(Pub. L. 108–357, title VI, §641, Oct. 22, 2004, 118 Stat. 1534.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Sections 106A and 106B of the Agricultural Act of 1949, referred to in text, were classified to sections 1445–1 and 1445–2, respectively, of this title prior to repeal by Pub. L. 108–357, title VI, §612(a), Oct. 22, 2004, 118 Stat. 1523.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section applicable to the 2005 and subsequent crops of tobacco, see section 643 of Pub. L. 108–357, set out as a note under section 518 of this title.
#### 1235.011-70 Contract clause.

The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 1252.235-71, Technology Transfer, in all solicitations and contracts for experimental, developmental, or research work.
#### State of Connecticut *v.*Dennis J. Teart

*William M. Shaughnessy,*special public defender, for the appellant (defendant).

*C. Robert Satti,*acting state’s attorney, for the appellee (state).

Argued October 1

decided October 1, 1974

The defendant’s motion for an order by this court to set aside the judgment of the trial court and to enter a judgment of not guilty or, in the alternative, for an order to the trial judge to take such action as necessary to complete the record in the appeal from the Superior Court in Middlesex County is denied.
Exhibit 3.3
                      ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT
               TO THE ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION OF
                   ENNIS BUSINESS FORMS, INC.


      Pursuant  to  the provisions of Article 4.04 of  the  Texas
Business Corporation act, the undersigned corporation adopts  the
following articles of amendment to its articles of incorporation:

                           ARTICLE ONE

     The name of the corporation is Ennis Business Forms, Inc.

                           ARTICLE TWO

     The following amendment to the Articles of Incorporation was
adopted by the shareholders of the corporation effective on  June
17,  2004.  The amendment to the Articles of Incorporation alters
or  changes Article One of the original Articles of Incorporation
and the full test of the Article is amended to read as follows:

     The name of the corporation is:

                           Ennis, Inc.

                          ARTICLE THREE

      The number of shares of the corporation outstanding at  the
time  of  such adoption was 16,393,157, and the number of  shares
entitled  to vote thereon was 16,393,157.  The number  of  shares
voted for such amendment was 14,876,196, and the number of shares
voted against such amendment was 1,516,961.

                          ARTICLE FOUR

     The holders of all of the shares outstanding and entitled to
vote  on said amendment have signed a consent in writing pursuant
to  Article 9.10 adopting said amendment, and any written  notice
required by Article 9.10 has been given.

Dated effective:  June 17, 2004

                              ENNIS BUSINESS FORMS, INC.


                              By: /s/ Harve Cathey
                                  ------------------------------
                                   Harve Cathey, Vice President
                                   and Secretary
# F~ECE\VED U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

## NOV -9 2015 

## HEARING DOCKET
Inthe matter of: ARCTIC SLOPE NATIVE ASSOCIATION, LTD.
JUDGE GOODWIN ) ) ) ) ) Docket No. FAA-2015-2437 Case No. 2015NM730027

WITHDRAWAL OF COMPLAINT The parties have reached a settlement. Pursuantto that agreement, Complainanthereby withdraws its complaint in this matter with the understanding thatthis proceeding will be dismissed withprejudice. Respectfully submitted this 30th day ofOctober 2015. Peter J. Lynch Assistant ChiefCounsel

for Enforcement
By: Glenn H. Brown Enforcement Division, Western Team 222 W 7th Avenue Box 14 Anchorage, AK 99513-7587 email: glenn.brown@faa.gov telephone: (907) 271-5271 (direct) (907) 271-2800(fax)CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE Re: Arctic Slope Native Association, Ltd. FDMS No. FAA-2015-2437
I hereby certify that on this date I have served a copy ofthe FAA's Withdrawal ofComplaint by postage-prepaid, certified mail, return receipt requested, to the following: Judge Richard C. Goodwin U.S. Administrative LawJudge Office ofHearings, M-20 US Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) Washington, DC 20590
Richard D. Monkman Sonosky, Chambers, Sachse,

Miller & Munson, LLP 900 West 5th Avenue Suite 700 Anchorage, AK 99501
I further certify that on this date I have served the original and one copy ofthe FAA's Withdrawal ofComplaintbypostage-prepaid, certified mail, return receipt requested, addressed as follows: Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 ATTN: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000
DATED:

Federal Aviation Administration Office ofRegional Counsel 222 West 7thAvenue, Box 14, AAL-7 Anchorage, Alaska 99513-7587
#### Edward B. Rock, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of Beatrice L. Rock, Deceased, Appellant, v. Fidelity and Casualty Company of New York, Respondent.

In a contract action to recover the face amount of an “All Common Carrier Passenger Accident” insurance policy issued by defendant to plaintiff’s intestate, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated September 6, 1961, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and which denied his (plaintiff’s) cross motion for summary judgment for the sum demanded in the complaint, pursuant to rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice. Order modified by striking out the first ordering paragraph granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment, and by substituting therefor a paragraph denying such motion. As so modified, order affirmed, without costs. The record discloses the existence of issues of fact which may not be decided summarily on motion *(Cardinal Lbr. Co.*v. *Lincoln Park Bldrs. Supply,*8 A D 2d 839). The plaintiff’s affidavits (in support of his cross motion and in opposition to the defendant’s motion) raise an issue of fact as to where decedent was when she was assaulted. Under such circumstances, the question whether the decedent, within the terms and meaning of the insurance policy, was a fare-paying passenger boarding a public conveyance at the time of the assault, should be determined upon a trial of the action. Under the summary judgment rule the test is whether or not a triable issue of fact exists, and such issue may be disclosed either by the pleadings or the affidavits *(Curry*v. *Mackenzie,*239 N. Y. 267; *Gent*v. *Midtown Holdings Corp.,*10 A D 2d 901; *Hellmuth*v. *Brandin,*3 A D 2d 997). Moreover, the affidavits need not necessarily be consistent with the allegations contained in the pleadings or bill of particulars *(Rizzi*v. *Sussman,*9 A D 2d 961; *Levitz*v. *Robbins Music Corp.,*6 A D 2d 1027). Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Brennan and Hill, JJ., concur. [30 Misc 2d 943.]
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Esterline Technologies Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended April 28, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-Q), I, Robert W. Cremin,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2) The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



|                    |  |  |  |     |  |                      |  |                                                
|------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | -------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------
|                    |  |  | 
|Dated: June 6, 2006 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Robert W. Cremin
|                    |  |  |  |     |  |                      |  | Robert W. Cremin                               
|                    |  |  |  |     |  |                      |  | Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
§ 865.116 Records of DRB proceeding. ( a ) When the proceedings in any review have been concluded, a record thereof will be prepared. Records may include written records, electromagnetic records, or a combination thereof.
( b ) At a minimum, the record will include the following: ( 1 ) The application for review (DD Form 293).
( 2 ) A record of the testimony in verbatim, summarized, or recorded form at the option of the DRB.
( 3 ) Documentary evidence or copies thereof considered by the DRB other than the military record.
( 4 ) Brief/arguments submitted by or on behalf of the applicant.
( 5 ) Advisory opinions considered by the DRB, if any.
( 6 ) The findings, conclusions, and reasons developed by the DRB.
( 7 ) Notification of the DRB's decision to the cognizant custodian of the applicant's records, or reference to the notification document.
( 8 ) Minority reports, if any.
( 9 ) A copy of the decisional document.
Document converted from PDF

UNITED STATES DBPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

THESECRETAHY

TO: Chief Operating Officer

Office of Student Financial Assistance Programs

FROM: The Secretary

SUI3.1EC'T: Delegations of Administrative Authorities

I. DELEGATION OF Authority

Under the authority vested in me by Section 412 of the Department of Education

Organization Act, Public Law 96-88, 20 U.S.C. §3472, as amended,1 hereby

delegate to you, yoursuccessor in function, and to anyone serving for you in an acting

capacity, the following administrative authorities, as conveyed to Principal Officersfor

their respective areas of responsibility (copies attached), to be exercised with respect to

the area of responsibility of the Office of Student Financial Assistance Programs.

Certification Date Authority Delegated

A 9/18/80 Authority to Close Committee Meetingsto the Public

B 9/4//92 Authority Uunder 34 CFR, Pa1t 8 Regarding Demands for

Testimony

C. 6/14/94 Authority to Approve and Sign Certainn Federal Register

Documents (Sec additional authorities below.)

D. 11/7/95 Authority to Accept Gifts of Travel From ED Employees

E.I 7/31/96 Authority to File Written Objections to OPM Under 

5 U.S.C. 3595 (b) (3) (B)

F. 8/20/96 Authority to Approve State Plans, Consolidated State

Plans, State Applications, and Consolidated State

Applications

G. 9/29/97 Authority to Suspend/Remove/Terminate Employees for

Reasons of Suitability Under 5 CFR 315 <md 731
Page 2 Delegation of Authority

s

H. 5/18/98 Authority to Approve Premium Pay for Year 2000 Conversion Activities

I. 7/22/98 Authority to Assert Deliberative Process Privilege as a Basis for 

Withholding Documents or Testimony

In addition to the list of documents that may be approved and signed by Principal 

Officers for publication in the Federal Register in Subsection C above, I also delegate

to you, your successor in function, and to anyone serving for you in an acting

capacity, the authority to approve and sign the following additional documents for

publication in the Federal Register:

I . Routine closing date notices for student financial assistance programs; and

2. Notices of accreditation status pursuant to an applicable statute (for example,see

Section 10I of the Higher Education Act, as amended).

Unless otherwise noted in future delegations of authority, amendmentsto the

authorities delegated herein are included within the scope of this delegation.

11. RESERVATIONS

Unless otherwise noted, the reservations noted in the actual delegation documents

remain in effect.

Ill. REDELEGATION

The redelegations of the authorities and restrictions on redelegationsin the

actual delegation documents remain in effect.

IV. CERTIFICATION AND EFFECTIVE DATE

This delegation is effective upon certification by the Department's Principal

Delegations

Control Officer.

l hereby ratify actions within the scope of this delegation taken by you prior to the date

of certification.

_______Richard Riley_

OGC Clearance and Date: Theodore Sky, 11/5/98

Certification: Naty G. Beetle, 11/18/98, EA/EN/2
September 2 0 , 2016

Exemption No. 12285B
Regulatory Docket No. FAA

– 20 15

– 1201

Mr. Luis A. Hernandez, Jr.
Luis A. Hernandez, Jr. aka Hollywood Unmanned Aircraft Systems aka Hollywood UAS aka
HollywoodUAS.com

10945 Hortense Street #204
North Hollywood, CA 91602

Dear Mr. Hernandez :

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition for an amendment. It explains
the basis for our decision, describes its effect, and lists any changes to the original conditions

and limitations.

By letter dated December 18, 2015 , you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration

(FAA) on behalf of Luis A. He rnandez, Jr. aka Hollywood Unmanned Aircraft Systems aka
Hollywood UAS aka HollywoodUAS.com (hereinafter petitioner or operator) for an

amendment to your current exemption . That exemption from §§ 61.23(a) and ( c ),

61.101(e)(4 ) and (5), 61.113(a), 61.315(a) , 91.7(a), 91.119(c), 91.121, 91.151(a)(1),

91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) and (2), and 91.417(a) and (b) of Title 14, Code of
Federal Regulations (14 CFR) allows the petitioner to conduct UAS operations

. You
requested an amendment to chang e the company name from Luis Hernandez, Jr. to Luis A.
Hernandez, Jr. aka Hollywood Unmanned Aircraft Systems aka Hollywood UAS aka
HollywoodUAS.com

.

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons
relative to pu blic interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition

in the Federal Register because the requested amendment to the exemption would not set a precedent, and any delay in acting on this pe tition would be detrimental to the petitioner

.2

Our Decision

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 12285A
remains valid and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the authority contained

in 49 U.S.C

. 106(f), 40113, and 44701, delegated to me by the Administrator, the operator is
granted an amendment to change the operator name

.

The operator shall add th is amendment to its original exemption.

Conditions and Limitations

In this grant of amendment, Luis A. Hernandez, Jr. aka Hollywood Unmanned Aircraft
Systems aka Hollywood UAS aka HollywoodUAS.com is hereafter referred to as the

operator. All conditions and limitations within Grant of Exemption No. 12285A remain in

effect

.

Failure to comply with any of the conditions and limitations of this grant of exemption will be
grounds for the immediate suspension or rescission of this exemption.

T hi s exemption terminates on August 31, 2017 , unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/ s/

John S. Duncan

Di rector, Flight Standards Service
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Eye Institute Special; Emphasis Panel BRAIN Initiative: New Concepts and Early—Stage Research for Large—Scale Recording and Modulation in the Nervous System (R21).                    

*Date:*                         February 2, 2021.                    

*Time:*                         12:00 p.m. to 3:30 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, 6700B Rockledge Drive, Suite 3400, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Brian Hoshaw, Ph.D., Designated Federal Official, Division of Extramural Research, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, 6700B Rockledge Drive, Suite 3400, Rockville, MD 20892, 301-451-2020,                         *hoshawb@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.867, Vision Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: January 7, 2021. 

Melanie J. Pantoja, Program Analyst,

Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2021-00493 Filed 1-12-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
Fiscal Year 2006 Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies - HAWAII

Maximum Required

Expenditures For 

Choice-Related Maximum Per-Child

Transportation Expenditure For

FY 2006 Title I And Supplemental Supplemental

LEA ID District Allocation* Educational Services** Educational Services***

1500001 Hawaii County 7,711,814 1,542,363 1,668.14

1500003 Honolulu County 32,422,980 6,484,596 1,827.06

1500005 Kalawao County 0 0 0.00

1500007 Kauai County 1,956,347 391,269 1,374.80

1500009 Maui County 3,880,382 776,076 1,325.27

1599998 Undistributed 0 0 0.00

1599999 PART D SUBPART 2 0 0 0.00

* Actual amounts received by LEAs will be smaller than shown here due to State-level adjustments to Federal Title I allocations. States adjust

 allocations, for example, to reflect LEA boundary changes or the creation of new LEAs, including charter school LEAs, that are not accounted

 for in the statutory calculations. States also are permitted to reserve up to 1 percent of allocations for administration and generally must

 reserve 4 percent in fiscal year 2006 for school improvement activities. These adjustments will reduce the actual amounts available

 under all three columns of the table.

** An LEA must use up to an amount equal to 20 percent of its Title I, Part A allocation (the “20-percent reservation”) received from the State 

 to cover choice-related transportation costs for students who exercise a choice option and to pay for supplemental educational services for

 students whose parents request such services. The 20-percent reservation may include Title I, Part A funds or funding from other Federal,

 State, local, and private sources. The amount shown in this column is the Department’s estimate of the amount that affected LEAs - those

 with schools identified for improvement, corrective action, or restructuring - may have to spend to meet this requirement. Actual 

 expenditures will depend on such factors as the number of students exercising a choice option or receiving supplemental educational services and

 the costs of satisfying these requests. An LEA has discretion to determine the allocation of these funds between choice-related transportation

 and supplemental educational services, except that it must spend at least one-quarter of the 20-percent reservation - or an amount equal to

 5 percent of its Title I, Part A allocation - on each activity if there is demand for both from students and their parents.

*** An LEA that must arrange for supplemental educational services is required to pay, for each child receiving services, the lesser of the actual cost

 of the services or an amount equal to the LEA’s Title I, Part A allocation received from the State divided by the number of poor students in the

 LEA, as determined by estimates produced by the US Bureau of the Census. Thus the amount shown in this column reflects the statutory “cap”

 on per-child expenditures for supplemental educational services.