alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
THE SECRETARY OF EDUCATION

WASHINGTON, DC 20202

TO: Assistant Secretary for Postsecondary Education

FROM: The Secretary

SUBJECT: Authority to Designate a Department Employee to Serve as the Designated Federal 

Officer for the Historically Black Colleges and Universities Capital Financing 

Advisory Board 

I. DELEGATION

By the authority vested in me by Section 412 of the Department of Education Organization Act, 20 

U.S.C. § 3472, I hereby delegate to you, or anyone serving for you in an acting capacity or 

delegated to perform the functions and duties of your position, the authority to designate a 

Department employee to serve as and carry out the duties of the Designated Federal Officer (DFO) 

for the Historically Black Colleges and Universities Capital Financing Advisory Board 

(HBCUCFAB), as set forth in 41 C.F.R. §§ 102-3.25 (definition of the term “Designated Federal 

Officer”), 102-3.105(i), and 102-3.120 and Sections 1009(e) and (f) of 5 U.S.C. Chapter 10 

(Federal Advisory Committees).

Unless otherwise noted in future delegations of authority, amendments to the existing authorities 

delegated herein are included within the scope of this delegation. 

II. RESERVATIONS

Unless otherwise noted in existing or future delegations of authority, the following is not 

delegated: 

The authority to appoint and fix the compensation of HBCUCFAB members. 

III. REDELEGATION

Subject to the requirements of law, you may redelegate any of the authority delegated to you in 

this delegation and authorize further redelegation. Any redelegation must be done in accordance 

with the Administrative Communications System directive, ACSD-OFO-015, Delegation of 

Authority, dated August 26, 2016. 

IV. IV. CERTIFICATION AND EFFECTIVE DATE 

This delegation is effective upon certification by the Department's Principal Delegations Control 

Officer. I ratify actions within the scope of this delegation taken by you prior to the date of 

certification.

____________/s__________ 

Miguel A. Cardona, Ed.D. 
OGC Clearance: /s/ Lauren Friedrich, 02/08/2023 

Certified Date: 2/15/23

Delegations Control Officer: Jim Clemmens

Control Number: EA/EP/405
Certification
 Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes  Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Emerson Radio Corp.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and
the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
   Date: November 11, 2009
    /s/ Greenfield PittsGreenfield PittsChief Financial Officer
### §1738k. Eligible activities and grantees

#### (a) Eligible entities

Activities eligible to receive assistance through the framework agreements entered into under section 1738f of this title, shall include—

(1) activities of the type described in the Global Environmental Protection Assistance Act of 1989 (22 U.S.C. 2281 et seq.);

(2) agriculture-related activities, including those that provide for the biological prevention and control of animal and plant pests and diseases, to benefit the environment; and

(3) local community initiatives that promote conservation and sustainable use of the environment.

#### (b) Regulation

All activities of the type referred to in subsection (a) shall, where appropriate, include initiatives that link conservation of natural resources with local community development.

#### (c) Setting of priorities

Appropriate activities and priorities relating to the use of an Environmental Fund shall be set by local nongovernmental organizations within the appropriate eligible country.

#### (d) Grants

Grants may be made by the body referred to in section 1738f(c) of this title from the Environmental Fund for environmental purposes to—

(1) host country nongovernmental environmental, conservation, development, educational, and indigenous peoples organizations;

(2) other appropriate local or regional entities; or

(3) in exceptional circumstances, the government of the eligible country.

#### (e) Priority

In providing assistance from an Environmental Fund, the body established under section 1738f(c) of this title within the eligible country shall give priority to projects that are run by nongovernmental organizations and other private entities, and that involve local communities in their planning and execution.

(July 10, 1954, ch. 469, title VI, §612, as added Pub. L. 101–624, title XV, §1512, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 3661; amended Pub. L. 102–237, title III, §306, Dec. 13, 1991, 105 Stat. 1856.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Global Environmental Protection Assistance Act of 1989, referred to in subsec. (a)(1), is title VII of Pub. L. 101–240, Dec. 19, 1989, 103 Stat. 2521, which is classified generally to part VII (§2281 et seq.) of subchapter I of chapter 32 and chapter 86 (§7901 et seq.) of Title 22, Foreign Relations and Intercourse. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title of 1989 Amendments note set out under section 2151 of Title 22 and Tables.

#### Amendments

1991—Subsec. (a)(1). Pub. L. 102–237 substituted "2281 et seq.);" for "462), and—".
# SINCLAIR

COMMUNITY COLLEGE

U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations West Building Ground Floor, Room W 12-140 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590
July 10, 2015
Subject: Sinclair Community College Petition to Amend Section 333 Exemption No. 11552, Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2015-0374 Dear Sir or Madam, Sinclair Community College respectfully petitions to add the following small unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) to the referenced exemption granted May 12, 2015. The UAS in this request have been assigned and the following FAA registration numbers:
UAS Aircraft Serial Number Re istration Number Inda o AP3522 N358SC Vireo 1002 N338SC Vireo 1003 N346SC This request does not impact the conditions and reasons relative to public interest and safety that support the original exemption. The following proprietary operating documents have been uploaded and previously mailed to: ATTN: The Office of Rulemaking FAA Headquarters, Building l0A 800 Independence Avenue, S W Washington, DC 20591

• Attachment #1: Indago User Guide, Lockheed Martin Procerus Technologies, Release 1.1 (includes both operator and maintenance guidance) 

## • Attachment #2: Operations Manual, Vireo Unmanned Aircraft System, Rosemount Aerospace, Inc. Document 11009-0001, Revision 05 • Attachment #3: Maintenance Manual, Vireo Unmanned Aircraft System, Rosemount Aerospace, Inc. Document 11009-0002, Revision 02 Please direct questions concerning this petition to Jeff Miller at jeff.miller, , &sinclair.edu or

Jeffr
/ Cmr ' mUmty er Assi Presi ent, Wo rce Development Sincl Colle 444 d Street Davt 402
Case: 1:11-cv-09236 Document #: 6 Filed: 02/13/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:10
189 So. 450

#### STATE v. KENNEDY.

No. 35255.

April 3, 1939.

Rehearing Denied May 29, 1939.

J. B. Crow, of Shreveport, for appellant.

David M. Ellison, Atty. Gen., James O’Connor, Asst. Atty. Gen., and James U. Galloway, Dist. Atty., of Shreveport, for the State.

LAND, Justice.

Defendant was found guilty of the crime of forgery of a check for $108.40, and was sentenced to the State Penitentiary for a term of not less than four years nor more than twelve years.

An appeal was granted to this court. As it does not appear from the record that defendant applied for a new trial in the lower court before the appeal was taken, the State has moved to dismiss the appeal.

*847In State v. Eubanks, 179 La. 92, 153 So. 31, it is said by the court that:

> “It is provided in article 559 of the Code of Criminal Procedure that: ‘No new trial can be granted on appeal unless a motion for same has been made arid refused in the lower court. * * * ’

> “In State v. Stinson, 174 La. 510, 141 So. 44, this court enforced the above provision and dismissed defendant’s appeal, saying: ‘The record contains nine bills of exception, but they are of no value to defendant, even if they possessed merit, which they do not, for the reason that defendant has not placed himself in position to obtain relief by filing and pressing a motion for a new trial in the district court.”

i

For the same reason, the appeal was dismissed in State v. Eubanks, cited supra, in which the court said:

> “The plain purpose of our Code of Criminal Procedure, in requiring that a defendant shall apply for a new trial, or else' forfeit his right to be- heard on appeal, is not only that the defendant, as well as the state, shall be fairly dealt with, but that the defendant shall exhaust all of his legal remedies in the court below, in order to correct errors, avoid delays, and prevent miscarriages’of public justice.

> “The appeal in this case is dismissed.” 179 La. page 99, 153 So. page 33.

In State v. Stephens, 183 La. 431, 164 So. 162, the court said: “The defendant, having failed to file a motion for a new trial and thereby exhaust his remedies in the trial court by submitting for review the rulings there made and complained of before appealing to this court, in accordance with the requirements of article 559 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, is not entitled to be heard before this court.

“State v. Stinson, 174 La. 510, 141 So. 44; State v. Eubanks, 179 La. 92, 153 So. 31.”

The record contains two bills of exceptions, which cannot be reviewed by this court, as the defendant has not placed himself in position to obtain relief by filing a motion in the lower court for a new trial.

The appeal in this case is dismissed.

HIGGINS, J., absent.
EXHIBIT
32.2





Certification
of Principal Financial Officer


Pursuant
to U.S.C. Section 1350


As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




Pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned
officer of NeuMedia, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), does hereby
certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:





The
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ending March 31, 2010 of the Company
(the “Form 10-K”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Form
10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.




Dated: July
14, 2010


/s/ Russell BurkeRussell
      BurkeChief
      Financial Officer
Exhibit32.1

** **

** **

 

 

 

In connection with the Annual Report on Form10-K of Davidson Income Real Estate, L.P. (the "Partnership"), for the fiscalyear ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Steven D. Cordes, as theequivalent of the chief executive officer of the Partnership, and Stephen B.Waters, as the equivalent of the chief financial officer of the Partnership,each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of hisknowledge:

 

(1)   The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)   Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

 

 

This certification isfurnished with this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Partnership for purposes of Section 18of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended.
EXHIBIT
32.A
   
   CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
   In connection
with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2008, of
El Paso Natural Gas Company (the “Company”) as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James J. Cleary,
President, certify (i) that the Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
(ii) that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
     /s/
      James J. ClearyJames
      J. ClearyPresident(Principal
      Executive Officer)El
      Paso Natural Gas CompanyMay
      9, 2008
  
     A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
El Paso Natural Gas Company and will be retained by El Paso Natural Gas Company
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request
### §2463. Repealed. Pub. L. 103–349, §8(c)(2), Oct. 6, 1994, 108 Stat. 3141

Section, Pub. L. 91–577, title II, §73, Dec. 24, 1970, 84 Stat. 1550; Pub. L. 103–349, §8(c)(1), Oct. 6, 1994, 108 Stat. 3140, related to appeal or civil action in contested cases. Prior to repeal, subsec. (b) of this section was transferred to section 2504 of this title by Pub. L. 103–349, §8(c)(1), Oct. 6, 1994, 108 Stat. 3140.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective 180 days after Oct. 6, 1994, see section 15 of Pub. L. 103–349, set out as an Effective Date of 1994 Amendment note under section 2401 of this title.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

IRON WORKERS’ MID-AMERICA )

PENSION PLAN, et al., )

)

Plaintiffs, ) CIVIL ACTION

)

vs. ) NO. 12 C 0042

)

J & D ERECTORS, INC., an Illinois ) JUDGE REBECCA R. PALLMEYER

corporation, )

)

Defendant. )

MOTION FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT AND JUDGMENT

NOWCOME Plaintiffs, bytheir attorneys, and move for entryof judgment by default against

Defendant,J & D ERECTORS, INC., an Illinois corporation, in the total amount of $25,974.39, plus

Plaintiffs’ court costs and reasonable attorneys’ fees in the amount of $1,455.75. 

On January 8, 2012, the Summons and Complaint was served on the Registered Agent (by

tendering a copy of said documents to Philip Saineghi, the corporation’s president) at the registered

office of record (a copy of the Summons and Affidavit of Service is attached hereto). Therefore,

Defendant’s answer was due on January 30, 2012. As Defendant has failed to timely answer the

Complaint, Plaintiffs respectfully request entry of default and judgment.

/s/ Patrick N. Ryan 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned, an attorney of record, hereby certifies that he electronically filed the

foregoing document (Motion) with the Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system, and further

certifies that I have mailed the above-referenced document by United States Mail to the following

non-CM/ECF participant on or before the hour of 5:00 p.m. this 9th day of February 2012:

Ms. Josephine M. Saineghi, Registered Agent

J & D Erectors, Inc.

7616 West Berwyn Avenue

Chicago, IL 60656

/s/ Patrick N. Ryan 

Patrick N. Ryan

Attorney for Plaintiffs

BAUM SIGMAN AUERBACH & NEUMAN, LTD.

200 West Adams Street, Suite 2200

Chicago, IL 60606-5231

Bar No.: 6278364

Telephone: (312) 236-4316

Facsimile: (312) 236-0241

E-Mail: pryan@baumsigman.com

I:\MIDJ\J and D\#23468\motion for default judgment.pnr.df.wpd
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON

DIVISION II

In the Matter of the Personal Restraint of

DOMINIQUE JAMAAL STEWART,

Petitioner.

Nos. 51380-3-II and 56260-0-II

(consolidated)

UNPUBLISHED OPINION

CRUSER,J.—Dominque Jamaal Stewart seeks relief from personal restraint imposed

following his 2011 pleas of guilty to two counts of first degree robbery and one count of 

second degree manslaughter, crimes he committed when he was 17 years old. He argues 

that he is entitled to be resentenced under State v. Houston-Sconiers, 188 Wn.2d 1, 391 P.3d 

409 (2017), In re Pers. Restraint of Ali, 196 Wn.2d 220, 474 P.3d 507 (2020), cert. denied, 

141 S. Ct. 1754 (2021), and In re Pers. Restraint of Domingo-Cornelio, 196 Wn.2d 255, 474 

P.3d 524 (2020), cert. denied, 141 S. Ct. 1754 (2021), so that the trial court can take into 

account his youthfulness at the time of his crimes. The State concedes that Stewart is entitled 

to resentencing. Accordingly, we grant Stewart’s petition and remand his 2011 judgment 

and sentence to the trial court for resentencing. We deny Stewart’s motion for release 

pending resentencing.

Filed

Washington State

Court of Appeals

Division Two

February 23, 2022
Nos. 51380-3-II and 56260-0-II

2

A majority of the panel having determined that this opinion will not be printed in the 

Washington Appellate Reports, but will be filed for public record in accordance with RCW 

2.06.040, it is so ordered.

Cruser, J.

We concur:

Maxa, P.J.

Veljacic, J.
Exhibit 31.2  Certification  Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  (A separate certification is required for each officer)

 

 

I, Martine Billeaud, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of BNP U.S. Funding L.L.C.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this****report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within these entities, particularly during the period in which the report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based upon such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: March 31, 2006

 

|   | __________________________    |
|--------|-------------------------------|
|   | Title: President and Director |
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, October 22, 2018.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, October 22, 2018

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A19I0051. JOHN DINOS et al. v. RICHFIELD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION et al. .

Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

2016CV02027