alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: James Pew [jpew@earthjustice.org]

 Sent: 03/17/2010 09:38 AM MST

 To: Mathy Stanislaus

 Cc: Wendy Blake; Patricia Embrey; Scott Fulton; Lisa Heinzerling; Mary Lynch; Gina McCarthy; Bob 

Sussman

 Subject: RCRA authority for solid waste definition 

Dear Assistant Administrator Stanislaus: thank you again for taking the time to meet with me last week 

on the upcoming rulemaking to define non-hazardous solid waste. Attached is a short letter regarding 

EPA's RCRA authority to regulate spent solvents, plastics, and other industrial wastes that are burned on 

site as solid waste. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at the number below. 

 

Sincerely, 

 

Jim Pew 

 

 

James S. Pew 

Staff Attorney 

Earthjustice 

1625 Massachusetts Avenue, NW 

Washington, D.C. 20036 

(202) 667-4500 (phone) 

(202) 667-2356 (fax)
#### Clarence P. Greer, Respondent, v. Florence S. Daniels, Appellant.

In an action by an attorney to recover for legal services rendered and disburse*972ments made, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated April 18, 1962, denying her motion to dismiss the complaint for lack of prosecution. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Brennan and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 21 - SUBSIDIARIES OF PROVIDENT FINANCIAL


      The  following  table  sets forth all of  Provident  Financial's
subsidiaries as of the date of this report.

                                                         State of
                                                       Jurisdiction
                                       % of Voting    Under the Laws
                                        Securities        of which
                                          Owned          Organized

The Provident Bank                        100                  Ohio
  Provident Commercial Group, Inc.        100                  Ohio
    Provident Auto Leasing Company        100                Delaware
  Provident Securities and Investment
    Company                               100                  Ohio
  PB Realty, Inc.                         100                  Ohio
  Provident Consumer Financial
    Services, Inc.                        100                  Ohio
  Information Leasing Corporation         100                  Ohio
  Procurement Alternatives Corporation    100                  Ohio
The Provident Bank of Kentucky            100                Kentucky
FGBI Acquisition Corp.                    100                Florida
  Provident Bank of Florida               100                Florida
Provident Investment Advisers, Inc.       100                  Ohio
Provident Mortgage Company                100                  Ohio
Provident Capital Trust I                 100                Delaware
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS, EASTERN DIVISION

PNC Bank, National Association, successor to National City Bank of
the Midwest,

Plaintiff, (Case No. 12 CV 00201

Vs

Assigned Judge: Joan H.

OB Leasing, L.L.C.; Alan O’Brien; Heather O’Brien [Lefkow

Magistrate Judge: Young B.
Kim

Defendant.

MOTION FOR JUDGMENT OF FORECLOSURE AND SALE

NOW COMES the Plaintiff, PNC Bank, National Association, successor to National City Bank of
the Midwest, by its attorneys CROWLEY & LAMB, P.C., and moves the Court for the entry of a
Judgment of Foreclosure and Sale in its favor and against the Defendant(s):

OB Leasing, L.L.C., Alan O’Brien, and Heather O’Brien, and as grounds thereof state:

As appears from the Affidavit of Plaintiff placed on file in support of this Motion, and from the
pleadings and admissions on file, there is no genuine issue as to any material fact, and the Plaintiff is

entitled to a Judgment of Foreclosure and Sale in this case as a matter of law.

PNC Bank, National Association, successor to National
City Bank of the Midwest

By: /s/ Jennifer L. Hamilton
One of Its Attorneys

Patrick D, Lamb (ADRC#3128062)
Jennifer L. Hamilton (ARDC#6302148)
CROWLEY & LAMB, P.C.

221 N. LaSalle Street, Suite 1550
Chicago, Illinois 60601

(312) 670-6900
### §3354. Agricultural bioterrorism research and development

#### (a) In general

The Secretary of Agriculture (referred to in this section as the "Secretary") may utilize existing research authorities and research programs to protect the food supply of the United States by conducting and supporting research activities to—

(1) enhance the capability of the Secretary to respond in a timely manner to emerging or existing bioterrorist threats to the food and agricultural system of the United States;

(2) develop new and continue partnerships with institutions of higher education and other institutions to help form stable, long-term programs to enhance the biosecurity and food safety of the United States, including the coordination of the development, implementation, and enhancement of diverse capabilities for addressing threats to the nation's agricultural economy and food supply, with special emphasis on planning, training, outreach, and research activities related to vulnerability analyses, incident response, detection, and prevention technologies;

(3) strengthen coordination with the intelligence community to better identify research needs and evaluate materials or information acquired by the intelligence community relating to potential threats to United States agriculture;

(4) expand the involvement of the Secretary with international organizations dealing with plant and animal disease control;

(5) continue research to develop rapid detection field test kits to detect biological threats to plants and animals and to provide such test kits to State and local agencies preparing for or responding to bioterrorism;

(6) develop an agricultural bioterrorism early warning surveillance system through enhancing the capacity of and coordination between State veterinary diagnostic laboratories, Federal and State agricultural research facilities, and public health agencies; and

(7) otherwise improve the capacity of the Secretary to protect against the threat of bioterrorism.

#### (b) Authorization of appropriations

There is authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section, $190,000,000 for fiscal year 2002, and such sums as may be necessary for each subsequent fiscal year.

(Pub. L. 107–188, title III, §335, June 12, 2002, 116 Stat. 680.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Public Health Security and Bioterrorism Preparedness and Response Act of 2002, and not as part of the National Agricultural Research, Extension, and Teaching Policy Act of 1977 which comprises this chapter.
§ 203.10 Eligible activities. ( a ) TAPP procurements should be pursued by the RAB or TRC only to the extent that Federal, State, or local agencies responsible for overseeing environmental restoration at the facility do not have the necessary technical expertise for the proposed project, or the proposed technical assistance will contribute to the efficiency, effectiveness, or timeliness of environmental restoration activities at the installation and is likely to contribute to community acceptance of those activities.
( b ) TAPP procurements may be used to fund activities that will contribute to the public's ability to provide advice to decision-makers by improving the public's understanding of overall conditions and activities. Categories of eligible activities include the following: ( 1 ) *Interpret technical documents.* The installation restoration program documents each stage of investigation and decision-making with technical reports that summarize data and support cleanup decisions. Technical assistance may be provided to review plans and interpret technical reports for community members of RABs and TRCs. These reports include, but are not limited to: ( i ) Installation restoration program site studies, engineering documents, such as site inspections, remedial investigations, feasibility studies, engineering evaluation and cost analyses, and decision documents (including records of decision);
( ii ) Risk assessments, including baseline and ecological risk assessments conducted by the installation; and
( iii ) Health assessments, such as those conducted by the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR).
( 2 ) *Assess technologies.* Technical assistance may be provided to help RAB/TRC community members understand the function and implications of those technologies selected to investigate or clean up sites at the installation.
( 3 ) *Participate in relative risk site evaluations.* Technical assistance may be provided to help RAB/TRC community members contribute to the relative risk evaluation process for specific sites.
( 4 ) *Understand health implications.* Technical assistance may be provided to help RAB/TRC community members interpret the potential health implications of cleanup levels or remedial technologies, or to explain the health implications of site contaminants and exposure scenarios.
( 5 ) *Training, where appropriate.* Technical trainers on specific restoration issues may be appropriate in circumstances where RAB/TRC members need supplemental information on installation restoration projects.
I am requesting exemption of Section 333 in regards to the UAS flight for 

commercial usage for small business. Upon receiving of issuance a 

business will be formed to begin offering services, we have a market with 

customers who would be interested. When reviewing the regulations for 

Section 333 from the FAA, I am requesting to be exempt in the aspects of 

flight certifications needed due to low altitude and airworthiness check of 

equipment as it arrives pre-manufactured. The pilot for the exemption 

would be required to have logged greater than 100 hours of flight time prior 

to flying for payment.

During flights the UAV will maintain to below 200ft altitude from base (lower 

altitudes closer to air traffic as limited by DJI Safe Fly-zone1firmware) and 

within line-of-sight, maintain safe flying zones near air restrictions (current 

flight controller contains DJI Fly Safe1), monthly check of motor state and 

perform pre-flight checks on UAV, controller, batteries and display. The 

UAV would be a vertical take off capable quadcopter2allowing stable flight 

controls and return home at low altitude safety should any system fail. It will 

run on a 2.4 GHz digital spectrum locked to my UAV, preventing any loss 

or crossing of controls.

The goal of the exemption is to provide aerial videography and 

cinematography to enhance appeal for local businesses via advertising as 

well as provide businesses aerial imaging of their properties showing past 

growth changes. There is no business in the area offering this service 

currently. No individuals will be transported in the exemption as these 

UAVs have a minuscule payload capacity and will be solely used for 

gathering images.

 

1

DJI Fly Safe is a firmware installed in the flight controller limited flight to designated area. Arears surrounding Airports,

extreme congestion area, national borders or other governmental building are blocked, preventing the entry of UAV into the 

airspace. The UAV will not take flight if located within the area of no fly zone as marked. These areas of safe flying are 

constantly updated via updates from DJI to ensure safe and responsible flights

2

The UAV to be used in this exemption would be the DJI Phantom 3 Professional, DJI Inspire 1 and/or DJI S800 Evo. The total 

mass of these UAVs would remain under 15lbs including payload. The The maximum flight speed of these would remain under 

45 mph, the highest of which is DJI Inspire 1.
OFFICIAL NOTICE FROM COURT OFCRIMPWAL APPEALS OFTEXAS

P.O. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711

OFFICIAL BUSINESS,- %«rc»w»w o^*0^

STATE OF TP5f&«a z* 'B^ft;«'^^^^^ £(4 fTzSk-^^'^^^'

FISUkSAIl "iPV IS/*=SltBl ' .V •>*&-' DSfirfvljisSS^ 3 ^V "^Ki±^' P1THEV BOWES ISIftSALTY FOR /. t\ §xj^ fe$l||^§£ » lf»un) «*«»*

1/7/2015 PRIVATE USE §-.,s %£:* |jgg|fi^ 0004279596 janosIois RARRFTD iQAAr tEL/^* 'fi*2** A^Pfellffii^ MAILED FROM ZIPCODE 78 701 BAKKblO, ISAAC TK-Ct No^07918^A WR-82 606-01

The Court has dismissed yojfcaj^rajiDiftifdr writ of habeas corpus'without written order for non-c^^^mMml Rules of Appellate Procedure

art 11 07 Ca,ly' th^^^?\^°V^ "P^P^fescribed form per

Abel Acosta, Clerk

The Court has dismissed youk^pfqajgjSfri$r writ of habeas corpus'without

V^^PfARRETO «gSSS»*

.WTRAVIS CO. CORR. CEN -TDC # 1431513

3614 BILL PRICE RD

DEL VALUE, TX 78617

•E6N3B 7B£i7 ,lM,lMl,,,l,,ll'ill,l,,,l,,,,il,r,,llll,,l!,|,,,llll,l,lll,ll'
### §3317. Program evaluation studies

(a) The Secretary shall regularly conduct program evaluations to meet the purposes of this chapter and the responsibilities assigned to the Secretary and the Department of Agriculture in this chapter. Such evaluations shall be designed to provide information that may be used to improve the administration and effectiveness of agricultural research, extension, and teaching programs in achieving their stated objectives.

(b) The Secretary is authorized to encourage and foster the regular evaluation of agricultural research, extension, and teaching programs within the State agricultural experiment stations, cooperative extension services, and colleges and universities, through the development and support of cooperative evaluation programs and program evaluation centers and institutes.

(Pub. L. 95–113, title XIV, §1471, as added Pub. L. 97–98, title XIV, §1439(a), Dec. 22, 1981, 95 Stat. 1314.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

For definition of "this chapter", referred to in subsec. (a), see note set out under section 3102 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Dec. 22, 1981, see section 1801 of Pub. L. 97–98, set out as a note under section 4301 of this title.
### §1745. Computation of carryover

The quantity of any commodity in the commodity set-aside or transferred from the set-aside to the National Defense Stockpile established by the Strategic and Critical Materials Stock Piling Act (50 U.S.C. 98 et seq.) shall be excluded from the computation of "carryover" for the purpose of determining the price support level for such commodity under the Agricultural Act of 1949, as amended [7 U.S.C. 1421 et seq.], and related legislation, but shall be included in the computation of total supplies for purposes of acreage allotments and marketing quotas under the Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1938, as amended [7 U.S.C. 1281 et seq.], and related legislation. Until such time as the commodity set-aside has been completed, such quantity of the commodity as the Secretary shall determine between the maximum and minimum quantities specified in section 1741 of this title shall be excluded from the computations of "carryover" for the purpose of determining the price support level, but shall be included in the computation of total supplies for purposes of acreage allotments and marketing quotas, for the 1955 crop of the commodity, notwithstanding that the quantity so excluded may not have been acquired by the Corporation and included in the commodity set-aside.

(Aug. 28, 1954, ch. 1041, title I, §105, 68 Stat. 898; Pub. L. 96–41, §3(a)(2), July 30, 1979, 93 Stat. 324.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Strategic and Critical Materials Stock Piling Act, referred to in text, is act June 7, 1939, ch. 190, as revised generally by Pub. L. 96–41, §2, July 30, 1979, 93 Stat. 319, which is classified generally to subchapter III (§98 et seq.) of chapter 5 of Title 50, War and National Defense. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 98 of Title 50 and Tables.

The Agricultural Act of 1949, referred to in text, is act Oct. 31, 1949, ch. 792, 63 Stat. 1051, which is classified principally to chapter 35A (§1421 et seq.) of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note under section 1421 of this title and Tables.

The Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1938, referred to in text, is act Feb. 16, 1938, ch. 30, 52 Stat. 31, which is classified principally to chapter 35 (§1281 et seq.) of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 1281 of this title and Tables.

#### Amendments

1979—Pub. L. 96–41 substituted "the National Defense Stockpile established by the Strategic and Critical Materials Stock Piling Act (50 U.S.C. 98 et seq.)" for "the national stockpile established pursuant to the act of June 7, 1939, as amended".
#### JACKSON v. HOWELL’S MOTOR FREIGHT, INC.

No. 345P97

Case below: 126 N.C.App. 476

Petition by appellant (City of Fayetteville) for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 2 October 1997. Petition by defendant (Howell’s Motor Freight) for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 2 October 1997.
[LETTERHEAD OF CLARKE AMERICAN]

December 16, 2005

Bob Leckie
1846 Fallow Run
San Antonio, TX 78248

Dear Bob:

I am pleased to extend this offer of employment to you for the position of Vice
President General Counsel, reporting to Chuck Dawson.

Your compensation package will include:

o    A starting base biweekly salary of $10,080.49 ($262,092.72/yr if
     annualized)

o    Vacation: You will be eligible for four weeks of vacation beginning in
     2006.

o    Bonus Plan: You are eligible to participate in the Company Bonus Plan with
     a maximum payout of 35% of base salary. This will be effective your first
     day of employment.

o    Eligibility for Vice President level benefits effective on the first day of
     your employment.

o    You will be eligible to participate in the Company benefits and Clarke
     American Financial Freedom Plan on your effective date with Clarke
     American.

o    Car allowance of $495.00 per month.

o    If Clarke American terminates your employment without cause, you will
     receive severance in accordance with company policy but no less than 52
     weeks of your base salary and appropriate executive level outplacement
     assistance.

This letter shall not constitute, or be evidence of any agreement or
understanding, expressed or implied, on the part of Clarke American to employ
you for any definite period of time, nor shall it alter your status as an
at-will employee of Clarke American.

This letter represents our entire offer of employment and is contingent upon
receipt of, a voided check for direct deposit purposes, providing proper
identification for I-9 purposes within three (3) business days of employment,
completion of the standard non-competition agreement, standard confidentiality
agreement, and an agreed upon employment date with Clarke American of not later
than January 1, 2006.

If these provisions meet with your approval, please sign one original and return
to me. Retain the other original for your records. We look forward to working
with you and hope that you will accept our offer of employment. I believe that
you can make a significant and lasting contribution to the future of our
company, and just as importantly, I believe that you will thoroughly enjoy your
career with Clarke American.

Sincerely,

/s/ Molly Daniels

Molly Daniels
Vice President, Human Resources
Enclosures:
Non-Compete Agreement
Confidentiality Agreement

           /s/ Bob Leckie                                       16 DEC 05
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ACCEPTED:  Bob Leckie                                     DATE:
NRC

https://secure.cds2.com:8080/main.html?download&weblink=87c7156b41046484b66ba32bd2b07239

&realfilename=NRC-v3.0.pdf
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

DONTEE M. BENNETT, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) No. 12 C 462

)

CITY OF CHICAGO, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

MEMORANDUM ORDER

Dontee Bennett (“Bennett”) has tendered the original of a 42

U.S.C. §1983 (“Section 1983”) Complaint against the City of

Chicago, its police officer Michael Katonda and what are listed

as “three unknown detectives John Does.” This Court expresses 1

no views as to the potential viability of Bennett’s

constitutional claim for Section 1983 purposes, but what he has

submitted to this point is incomplete in several respects.

For one thing, Bennett has not furnished the required copies

of the Complaint for service of process, nor has he provided the

necessary summonses for the same purpose. In addition, he has

neither paid the $350 filing fee nor submitted an Application To

Proceed In Forma Pauperis together with a printout of his trust

fund account at the Cook County Jail, where he is now in custody

(in the latter respect, see 28 U.S.C. §1915). If he does not

cure the flaws referred to here on or before February 10, 2012,

 Because the Complaint was handprinted on a sheet longer 1

than a standard 8-1/2 x 11 inch page, the Clerk’s Office has

reduced it in size both for filing purposes and to provide a copy

for this Court.
this action will be dismissed.

________________________________________

Milton I. Shadur

Senior United States District Judge

Date: January 25, 2012

2
§ 865.5 Decision of the Secretary of the Air Force. ( a ) The Secretary may direct such action as he or she deems appropriate on each case, including returning the case to the Board for further consideration. Cases returned to the Board for further reconsideration will be accompanied by a brief statement of the reasons for such action. If the Secretary does not accept the Board's recommendation, the Secretary's decision will be in writing and will include a brief statement of the grounds for his/her final decision.
( b ) *Decisions in cases under the Military Whistleblowers Protection Act.* The Secretary will issue decisions on such cases within 180 days after receipt of the case and will, unless the full relief requested is granted, inform applicants of their right to request review of the decision by the Secretary of Defense (SecDef). Applicants will also be informed: ( 1 ) Of the name and address of the official to whom the request for review must be submitted.
( 2 ) That the request for review must be submitted within 90 days after receipt of the decision by the Secretary of the Air Force.
( 3 ) That the request for review must be in writing and include the applicant's name, address, and telephone number; a copy of the application to the AFBCMR and the final decision of the Secretary of the Air Force; and a statement of the specific reasons the applicant is not satisfied with the decision of the Secretary of the Air Force.
( 4 ) That the request must be based on the Board record; requests for review based on factual allegations or evidence not previously presented to the Board will not be considered under this paragraph but may be the basis for reconsideration by the Board under § 865.6.
( c ) In cases under § 865.5(b) of this part which involve additional issues not cognizable under that paragraph, the additional issues may be considered separately by the Board under § 865.3 and § 865.4 of this part. The special time limit in § 865.5 (b) does not apply to the decision concerning these additional issues.
( d ) *Decisions in high profile or sensitive cases.* Prior to taking final action on a BCMR application that has generated, or is likely to generate, significant public or Congressional interest, the Secretarial designee will provide the case record of proceedings through Secretarial channels to OSAF so that the Secretary can determine whether to decide the case personally or take other action the Secretary deems appropriate.