alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
        32.1
 
 **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF**
 **THE
        SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 In
        connection with the Composite Technology Corporation (the "Company") Annual
        Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the
        Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
        Benton
        H Wilcoxon, Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer of
        the
        Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
        to
 Section
        906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
        The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
 
 (2)
        The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material respects
        the
        financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 */s/
                  Benton H Wilcoxon*
                
                *Benton
                  H Wilcoxon*
                *Chief
                  Executive Officer*
                *(Principal
                  Executive Officer)*
                
                *Date:
                  December 14, 2007*
#### STATE v. FAIR

No. 534P97

Case below: 127 N.CApp. 562

Petition by defendant for writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 5 February 1998.
1309.406-3 Procedures. ( a ) *Investigation and referral.* DOC employees shall immediately refer any cause that might serve as the basis for debarment through the contracting officer to the debarring official.
( b ) *Decision-making process.* ( 1 ) Procedures shall afford the contractor, and any named affiliates, an opportunity to submit information and argument in opposition to the proposed debarment. This may be done in person, in writing or through a representative.
( 2 ) In actions not based upon a conviction or civil judgment, where the contractor's submission raises a genuine dispute over facts material to the proposed debarment, the following procedures will be followed: ( i ) Provide the contractor an opportunity to appear with counsel, submit documentary evidence, present witnesses and confront any person the agency presents;
( ii ) A transcribed record of the proceeding will be made, unless the agency and contractor mutually agree to waive the requirement for a transcript. This transcribed record is available to the contractor at cost.
( c ) *Notice of proposal to debar.* A notice of proposed debarment shall be issued by the debarring official in accordance with FAR 9.406-3(c)(1) through (7).
( d ) *Debarring official's decision.* ( 1 ) For actions based upon a conviction or civil judgment, or when there is no authentic dispute over material facts, the debarring official's decision shall be based on all of the information in the administrative record plus any contractor-submitted data. If there is no suspension in effect, the decision shall be rendered within 30 working days after receipt of any information and argument submitted by the contractor. The debarring official can extend this timeframe for good cause.
( 2 ) ( i ) When necessary, written findings of fact shall be prepared as to disputed material facts. The debarring official will utilize the information in the written findings of fact, the data submitted by the contractor plus any other information in the administrative record to develop the decision.
( ii ) While the debarring official may refer matters involving disputed material facts to another official for findings of fact, the debarring official can disregard any such findings in whole or in part upon a determination that they are clearly erroneous.
( iii ) After the conclusion of proceedings with respect to disputed facts, the debarring official will make a decision.
( 3 ) When the proposed debarment is not based upon a conviction or civil judgment, the reason for debarment must be based on a preponderance of the evidence.
( e ) *Notice of debarring official's decision.* FAR 9.406-3(e)(1) establishes the notification procedures when a debarment has been imposed, while FAR 9.406-3(e)(2) establishes the procedure when a debarment is not imposed.
( f ) Procurement counsel shall assist and advise the debarring official at each stage of the decision-making process.
Case: 1:12-cv-00276 Document #: 122 Filed: 03/17/14 Page 4 of 9 PageID #:2875
Case: 1:12-cv-00276 Document #: 122 Filed: 03/17/14 Page 5 of 9 PageID #:2876
Case: 1:12-cv-00276 Document #: 122 Filed: 03/17/14 Page 6 of 9 PageID #:2877
### §4610a. Investigations and power to subpoena

#### (a) In general

The Secretary may make such investigations as the Secretary determines necessary—

(1) for the effective administration of this chapter; or

(2) to determine whether a person has engaged or is engaging in any act or practice that constitutes a violation of any provision of this chapter, or of any order, rule, or regulation issued under this chapter.

#### (b) Power to subpoena

#### (1) Investigations

For the purpose of an investigation made under subsection (a), the Secretary is authorized to administer oaths and affirmations and to issue a subpoena to require the production of any records that are relevant to the inquiry. The production of any such records may be required from any place in the United States.

#### (2) Administrative hearings

For the purpose of an administrative hearing held under section 4609 or 4610 of this title, the presiding officer is authorized to administer oaths and affirmations, subpoena witnesses, compel their attendance, take evidence, and require the production of any records that are relevant to the inquiry. Such attendance of witnesses and the production of any such records may be required from any place in the United States.

#### (c) Aid of courts

In case of contumacy by, or refusal to obey a subpoena issued to, any person, the Secretary may invoke the aid of any court of the United States within the jurisdiction of which such investigation or proceeding is carried on, or where such person resides or carries on business, in order to enforce a subpoena issued by the Secretary under subsection (b). The court may issue an order requiring such person to comply with such a subpoena.

#### (d) Contempt

Any failure to obey such order of the court may be punished by such court as a contempt thereof.

#### (e) Process

Process in any such case may be served in the judicial district in which such person resides or conducts business or wherever such person may be found.

#### (f) Hearing site

The site of any hearings held under section 4609 or 4610 of this title shall be within the judicial district where such person resides or has a principal place of business.

(Pub. L. 98–590, §11A, as added Pub. L. 101–624, title XIX, §1986, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 3908; amended Pub. L. 102–237, title VIII, §807(2), Dec. 13, 1991, 105 Stat. 1883.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1991—Subsec. (b)(2). Pub. L. 102–237 struck out "section" after "4609 or".
Order entered December ,2012

In The

Court of [ppeat 

:Fifth e( gexa at allas

NO. 05-12-00218-CR

GAYLAND LAMONT EDWARDS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 7

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F10-55217-Y

ORDER

The Court REINSTATES the appeal.

On October 29, 2012, ordered the trial court to make findings regarding why

appellant’s brief had not been filed. On November 29, 2012, we received appellant’s brief

together with an extension motion. Therefore, we VACATE the October 29, 2012 order.

We GRANT the November 29, 2012 extension motion and ORDER appellant’s brief

filed as of the date of this order.

DAVID L. BRJDGL~

JUSTICE
#### 1252.228-71 Fair Market Value of Aircraft.

As prescribed in 1228.306-70(a), insert the following clause:

# Fair Market Value of Aircraft (NOV 2022)

For purposes of clause 1252.228-70, Loss of or Damage to Leased Aircraft, the fair market value of the aircraft to be used in the performance of this contract shall be the lesser of the two values set out in paragraphs (a) and (b) below—

(a) $___; [*Contracting Officer insert value*] or

(b) If the Contractor has insured the same aircraft against loss or destruction in connection with other operations, the amount of such insurance coverage on the date of the loss or damage for which the Government may be responsible under this contract.

(End of clause)
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Carmine Vitagliano and Alexander Wright, Appellants.

Appeals by defendants Vitagliano and Wright from a judgment of the former County Court, Queens County, rendered June 28, 1961 after a joint jury trial, which convicted them (and one Anfossi) of robbery in the first degree, of petit larceny and of assault in the second degree, while acting in concert, and which imposed sentence upon the defendant Vitagliano as a first felony offender, and upon the defendant Wright as a second felony offender. Judgment affirmed as to the defendant Vitagliano. Judgment reversed on the law as to the defendant Wright; and the action severed and a new trial granted as to him. The findings of fact implicit in the jury’s verdict are affirmed. In our opinion, the search without a warrant of defendant Wright’s apartment, and his subsequent arrest which occurred four blocks away from such apartment and some 47 days after the search, rendered inadmissible as evidence against him upon the trial the revolver found in the search. Such lapse of time and such divergence between the place of search and the *locus*of the arrest violate the rule that a search without a warrant is to be deemed incidental to an arrest and lawful “only if it is substantially contemporaneous with the arrest and is confined to the immediate vicinity of the arrest ” *(Stoner*v. *California,*376 U. S. 483, 486; *Preston*v. *United States,*376 U. S. 364). We have considered all the other points raised by both defendants, and have concluded that such points are without merit. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld, Brennan, Hill and Rabin, JJ., concur.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

LSS/Research

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JUMAH THOMAS MOORE-ALI,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

JEANNE WOODFORD; et al.,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 08-15425

D.C. No. 4:05-CV-02676-SBA

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of California

Saundra Brown Armstrong, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 16, 2010** 

Before: SCHROEDER, PREGERSON, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges.

California state prisoner Jumah Thomas Moore-Ali appeals pro se from the

district court’s order denying his application to pursue his civil rights action in

FILED

APR 05 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
LSS/Research 2 08-15425

forma pauperis (“IFP”). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review

for abuse of discretion. O’Loughlin v. Doe, 920 F.2d 614, 616 (9th Cir. 1990). We

affirm.

Moore-Ali does not contest on appeal that he is a three-strikes filer under 28

U.S.C. § 1915(g). Moreover, the district court correctly determined that he did not

show that he was “under imminent danger of serious physical injury.” 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(g). The harm Moore-Ali alleged occurred approximately one year before

he filed the action. Accordingly, the district court properly denied his IFP

application.

AFFIRMED.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0655

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

CHRISTOPHER PAUL MCKEEN,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including October 13, 2023, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 6 2023

09/06/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0655
1309.405 Effect of listing. ( a ) Contracting officers shall review the Excluded Parties List System (EPLS) listing for contractors after the opening of bids or receipt of proposals and, again, immediately prior to award.
( b ) The designee authorized to determine that a compelling reason exists to do business with a debarred/suspended contractor is set forth in CAM 1301.70. This designation does not apply to FAR 23.506(e).
### **CHAPTER 51—CLASSIFICATION**

Sec.
5101.
Purpose.
5102.
Definitions; application.
5103.
Determination of applicability.
5104.
Basis for grading positions.
5105.
Standards for classification of positions.
5106.
Basis for classifying positions.
5107.
Classification of positions.
5108.
Classification of positions above GS–15.
5109.
Positions classified by statute.
5110.
Review of classification of positions.
5111.
Revocation and restoration of authority to classify positions.
5112.
General authority of the Office of Personnel Management.
5113.
Classification records.
[5114.
Repealed.]
5115.
Regulations.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**1992**—Pub. L. 102–378, §2(22), Oct. 2, 1992, 106 Stat. 1348, substituted "above GS–15" for "at GS–16, 17, and 18" in item 5108.

**1986**—Pub. L. 99–386, title I, §110(b), Aug. 22, 1986, 100 Stat. 822, struck out item 5114 "Reports; positions in GS–16, 17, and 18".

**1978**—Pub. L. 95–454, title IX, §906(a)(17), Oct. 13, 1978, 92 Stat. 1226, substituted "Office of Personnel Management" for "Civil Service Commission" in item 5112.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                          5
<MULTIPLIER>                       1,000

<S>                                <C>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  MAY-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                     JUN-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                       FEB-29-2000
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      9-MOS
<CASH>                                             861
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   42,443
<ALLOWANCES>                                     6,392
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    0
<PP&E>                                         487,105
<DEPRECIATION>                                 263,333
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 326,464
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               0
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                        10,887
<OTHER-SE>                                          0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   326,464
<SALES>                                         31,141
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               183,307
<CGS>                                           26,844
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  149,832
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,512
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 28,963
<INCOME-TAX>                                    11,005
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             17,958
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                    17,958
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.73
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.72


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 7 (Tuesday, January 12, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2415-2416]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-00524]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

TIME AND DATE: Friday, January 15, 2021, 1:00 p.m. Eastern Time.

PLACE: Because of the COVID-19 pandemic, the meeting will be held as an 
audio-only conference. The public may listen to the audio-only 
conference by following the instructions that will be posted on 
www.eeoc.gov 24 hours before the meeting. Closed captioning services 
will be available.

STATUS: The meeting will be open to the public.

MATTER TO BE CONSIDERED: The following item will be considered:

[[Page 2416]]

Proposed Updated Compliance Manual on Religious Discrimination

    Note: In accordance with the Sunshine Act, the public will be 
able to listen to the Commission's deliberations and voting. (In 
addition to publishing notices on EEOC Commission meetings in the 
Federal Register, the Commission also provides information about 
Commission meetings on its website, www.eeoc.gov. and provides a 
recorded announcement a week in advance on future Commission 
meetings.)

    Please telephone (202) 663-7100 (voice) or (202) 921-2750, or email 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#3c5f535151554f4f5553525159594855525b5f5351515952484f7c5959535f125b534a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="94f7fbf9f9fde7e7fdfbfaf9f1f1e0fdfaf3f7fbf9f9f1fae0e7d4f1f1fbf7baf3fbe2">[email protected]</span></a> at any time for information on this 
meeting.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Rachel V. See, Acting Executive 
Officer, (202) 921-2545.

    Dated: January 8, 2021.
Rachel V. See,
Acting Executive Officer, Executive Secretariat.
[FR Doc. 2021-00524 Filed 1-8-21; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6570-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### 1252.239-71 Information Technology Security Plan and Accreditation.

As prescribed in 1239.106-70, insert the following provision:

# Information Technology Security Plan and Accreditation (NOV 2022)

All offers submitted in response to this solicitation shall address the approach for completing the security plan and accreditation requirements in clause 1252.239-70, Security Requirements for Unclassified and Sensitive Information Technology Resources.

(End of provision)
### §2222. Details of law clerks

Law clerks may be detailed by the Secretary of Agriculture for service in or out of Washington.

(Mar. 4, 1911, ch. 238, 36 Stat. 1236.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 531 of Title 5 prior to the general revision and enactment of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees, by Pub. L. 89–554, §1, Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 378.
### §2569. Nonresident proprietors; service and notice

Every owner not residing in the United States may file in the Plant Variety Protection Office a written designation stating the name and address of a person residing within the United States on whom may be served process or notice of proceedings affecting the plant variety protection or rights thereunder. If the person designated cannot be found at the address given in the last designation, or if no person has been designated, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia shall have jurisdiction and summons shall be served by publication or otherwise as the court directs. The court shall have the same jurisdiction to take any action respecting the plant variety protection, or rights thereunder that it would have if the owner were personally within the jurisdiction of the court.

(Pub. L. 91–577, title III, §129, Dec. 24, 1970, 84 Stat. 1557.)
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 608 

To nullify the effect of the March 6, 2017, Executive order that temporarily 

restricts most nationals from six countries from entering the United States. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 13, 2017 

Mrs. FEINSTEIN (for herself, Mr. SCHUMER, Mr. DURBIN, Ms. KLOBUCHAR, 

Ms. CORTEZ MASTO, Mr. BOOKER, Mr. LEAHY, Mrs. SHAHEEN, Mr. 

COONS, Mr. BLUMENTHAL, Ms. HIRONO, Mr. MARKEY, Ms. BALDWIN, 

Ms. WARREN, Mr. CARPER, Mr. SANDERS, Mr. BENNET, Mrs. MURRAY, 

Mr. UDALL, Mr. KAINE, Mr. FRANKEN, Mr. SCHATZ, Mr. REED, Mrs. 

GILLIBRAND, Mr. MERKLEY, Ms. HASSAN, Mr. MURPHY, Mr. MENENDEZ, Mr. KING, Mr. WYDEN, Mr. CASEY, Mr. HEINRICH, Mr. CARDIN, 

Mr. VAN HOLLEN, Ms. DUCKWORTH, Mr. BROWN, Ms. STABENOW, and 

Ms. HARRIS) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To nullify the effect of the March 6, 2017, Executive order 

that temporarily restricts most nationals from six countries from entering the United States. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. RESCISSION. 

4 The provisions of Executive Order 13780 (82 Fed. 

5 Reg. 13209; March 6, 2017), entitled ‘‘Protecting the Namstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with BILLS

2 

•S 608 IS

1 tion From Foreign Terrorist Entry Into the United 

2 States’’, are rescinded and shall not have any legal effect. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 10.9

                          SUPPLEMENTAL LEASE AGREEMENT

Part A (hereinafter referred to as the "Group"): Tianjin Tianshi Group Co., Ltd.

Part B (hereinafter referred to as the "Biological"): Tianjin Tianshi Biological
Development Co., Ltd.

Group and Biological sign the hereinafter agreement that Group provides Oracle
software system services to Biological on the basis of equality, mutual benefit,
honesty and friendly negotiations. Both parties shall observe this agreement.

1.   Group shall provide the Oracle software system related services to
Biological and guarantee that the system in Biological runs properly.

2.   Term of Services: perpetuity

3.   The services fee of the system shall be included in the management fee that
Biological pays to Group, which is 1% of Biological's annual sales revenue.
Biological shall not pay any extra fee.

4.   This agreement shall act as a supplemental agreement of the original lease
agreement. Payment manners and obligations of both parties in this agreement
shall be strictly observed upon the original lease agreement, no further
regulations shall be made.

5.   This agreement has two originals, and each party keeps one of them.

6.   This agreement shall be effective from the date on which both parties sign
on it.

Party A (Signature):                                 Party B (Signature):
Tianjin Tianshi Group Co., Ltd.                      Tianjin Tianshi Biological
                                                     Development Co., Ltd.
[COMPANY SEAL AFFIXED]
                                                     [COMPANY SEAL AFFIXED]

Address:                                             Address:
No.6 YuanQuan Rd, WuQing                             No.6 YuanQuan Rd, WuQing
New-Tech Industrial Park,                            New-Tech Industrial Park,
Tianjin                                              Tianjin

Legal Representative                                 Legal Representative
(Or Consigner)                                       (Or Consigner)

June 30, 2005                                        June 30, 2005