UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

REGION III

1650 Arch Street

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103

DATE: August 15, 2012

SUBJECT: Technical Support Document Regarding Monitoring Data –Delaware, New 

Jersey, and Pennsylvania; Determination of Attainment of the 2006 24-Hour Fine 

Particulate Standard for the Philadelphia-Wilmington Nonattainment Area

 

FROM: Emlyn Vélez-Rosa, Environmental Engineer /s/

Office of Air Program Planning 

Loretta Hyden, Environmental Engineer /s/

Office of Air Monitoring and Analysis

TO: File

 

THRU: Donna Mastro, Acting Associate Director /s/

Office of Air Program Planning 

This Technical Support Document (TSD) provides a technical review of the air quality 

monitoring data used to support the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA’s) proposed 

determination that the Philadelphia-Wilmington, Pennsylvania-New Jersey-Delaware area 

(hereafter “the Philadelphia Area” or “the Area”) has attained the 2006 24-hour fine particulate 

(PM2.5) National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS). 

I. BACKGROUND

On July 16, 1997, EPA established an annual PM2.5 NAAQS at 15.0 micrograms per cubic meter 

(μg/m3) (hereafter referred to as “the 1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS”), based on a 3-year average of 

annual mean PM2.5 concentrations (62 FR 38652, July 18, 1997). At that time, EPA also 

established a 24-hour standard of 65 μg/m3(hereafter referred to as “the 1997 24-hour PM2.5

NAAQS”). See 40 CFR 50.7. The 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS were based on significant evidence and 

numerous health studies demonstrating that serious health effects are associated with exposures 

to particulate matter.

The process for designating areas following promulgation of a new or revised NAAQS is 

contained in 107(d)(1) of the Clean Air Act (CAA). On January 5, 2005 (70 FR 944), EPA 

published its air quality designations and classifications for the 1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS based 

upon air quality monitoring data for calendar years 2001-2003. These designations, effective on 
2

April 5, 2005, included the Philadelphia Area as a nonattainment area for the 1997 annual and 

24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS. The Philadelphia Area is comprised of the New Castle County in 

Delaware; Burlington, Camden, and Gloucester Counties in New Jersey; and Bucks, Chester, 

Delaware, Montgomery, and Philadelphia Counties in Pennsylvania. See 40 CFR 81.339 

(Pennsylvania), 40 CFR 81.331 (New Jersey), and 40 CFR 81.308 (Delaware).

On September 21, 2006, EPA retained the 1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS at 15.0 micrograms per 

cubic meter (μg/m3) (hereby “the 2006 annual PM2.5 NAAQS”) based on a 3-year average of 

annual mean PM2.5 concentrations, and promulgated a new 24-hour standard of 35 μg/m3based 

on a 3-year average of the 98th percentile of 24-hour concentrations (71 FR 61144, October 17, 

2006). The revised 2006 24-hour PM2.5 standards (hereafter “the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS”)

became effective on December 18, 2006. See 40 CFR 50.13. The more stringent 2006 24-hour 

PM2.5 NAAQS is based on significant evidence and numerous health studies demonstrating that 

serious health effects are associated with short-term exposures to PM2.5 at this level.

Many petitioners challenged aspects of EPA's 2006 revisions to the PM2.5 NAAQS. See

American Farm Bureau Federation and National Pork Producers Council, et al. v. EPA, 559 

F.3d 512 (D.C. Cir. 2009). As a result of this challenge, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 

District of Columbia remanded the 2006 annual PM2.5 NAAQS to EPA for further proceedings. 

The 2006 24-hour primary and secondary PM2.5 NAAQS were not affected by the remand and 

remain in effect. On November 13, 2009, EPA published designations for the 2006 24-hour 

PM2.5 NAAQS (74 FR 58688), which became effective on December 14, 2009. In that action,

EPA designated the Philadelphia Area as nonattainment for the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS.

II. EPA REQUIREMENTS

A. PM2.5 Attainment Requirements

On March 29, 2007, EPA issued a detailed implementation rule, codified at 40 CFR part 51, 

subpart Z, to assist states and tribes with the development of state implementation plans (SIPs) to 

demonstrate attainment with the 1997 annual and 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS (the “2007 PM2.5

Implementation Rule”) (72 FR 20586, April 25, 2007). EPA believes that the overall framework 

and policy approach of the 2007 PM2.5 Implementation Rule provides effective and appropriate 

guidance on the EPA’s interpretation of the general statutory requirements that states should 

address in their SIPs, and that such interpretation is relevant to the statutory requirements for the 

2006 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS. However, in light of new information that has become available 

since the issuance of the 2007 PM2.5 Implementation Rule, EPA published on March 2, 2012, the 

memorandum “Implementation Guidance for the 2006 24-Hour Fine Particle (PM2.5) National 

Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS)” (the “2006 24-hour PM2.5 Memorandum”).

1

 This

memorandum provides additional guidance to assist states with development of their SIPs for the 

2006 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS. 

 

1 EPA’s implementation guidance for the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS is available at 

http://www.epa.gov/ttn/naaqs/pm/pdfs/20120302_implement_guidance_24-hr_pm2.5_naaqs.pdf
3

In general, areas violating the NAAQS should meet the basic CAA requirements set forth in 

section 172. The 2006 24-hour PM2.5 nonattainment designations triggered the CAA’s 

requirements under section172(c), which requires the submission of an attainment plan for each 

designated nonattainment area. The 2007 PM2.5 Implementation Rule specifies that states must 

submit attainment plans for their nonattainment areas to EPA by no later than three years from 

the effective date of designation. Attainment plans for the 2006 24-hour standard must be 

submitted by December 14, 2012. The 2007 PM2.5 Implementation Rule also outlines the SIP

requirements for the attainment plan, which include among other things, the submission of an 

attainment demonstration showing the air quality improvements expected to result from national 

and local control measures, an analysis of reasonably available control measures (RACM), 

including all reasonably available control technology (RACT), reasonable further progress (RFP)

plan, and contingency measures. In the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 Memorandum, EPA recommends

that states follow a similar approach for each one of these SIP requirements when demonstrating 

attainment of the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS.

Under section 172(a)(2)(A) of the CAA, an area's attainment date would be the date by which 

attainment can be achieved as expeditiously as practicable, but no later than 5 years from the 

date such area was designated nonattainment, except that the Administrator may extend the 

attainment date to the extent the Administrator determines appropriate, for a period no greater 

than 10 years from the date of designation as nonattainment. Because the designation of 

nonattainment areas for the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS became effective on December 14,

2009, the presumptive five-year attainment date for many areas would be no later than December 

14, 2014. The 2006 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS relies on evaluating three full calendar years of air 

quality data to calculate the 24-hour design value for the area. To determine attainment, the EPA 

commonly uses the three most recent calendar years of complete air quality data that are 

available for the nonattainment area.

B. Monitoring Network

An adequate monitoring network for PM2.5 should satisfy the specific minimum criteria for 

establishing state and local air monitoring stations for PM2.5 data collection, as described in 40 

CFR part 58, appendix D, section 4.7. Additionally, the monitoring network in place should be 

consistent with the most recent annual monitoring network plan submitted by the State or local 

agency and approved by EPA. See 40 CFR 58.10.

C. Monitoring Data 

Under EPA regulations at 40 CFR 50.13(c), the 2006 24-hour primary and secondary PM2.5

NAAQS are met when the 98th percentile 24-hour concentration, as determined in accordance 

with 40 CFR part 50, appendix N, is less than or equal to 35.0 ug/m3. Data handling conventions 

and computations necessary for determining whether areas have met the PM2.5 NAAQS, 

including requirements for data completeness, are also listed in 40 CFR part 50, appendix N. 
4

Specifically, the 24-hour PM2.5NAAQS is met when the “24-hour standard design value,” that is, 

the 3-year average of annual 98th percentile 24-hour average values, recorded at each monitoring 

site is less than or equal to 35 μg/m3. The 98

th percentile is defined as the daily value out of a 

year of PM2.5 monitoring data below which 98 percent of all daily values fall. The comparison 

of the 24-hour standard design value (hereafter “the 24-hour design value”) to the 2006 24-hour 

PM2.5 NAAQS shall be based on 3 consecutive, complete years of air quality data. A year meets 

data completeness requirements when at least 75 percent of the scheduled sampling days for each 

quarter have valid data. However, years shall be considered valid, notwithstanding quarters with 

less than complete data (even quarters with less than 11 samples), if the resulting annual 98th

percentile value or resulting 24-hour standard design value is greater than the level of the 

standard. The use of less than complete data is subject to the approval of EPA which may 

consider factors such as monitoring site closures/moves, monitoring diligence, and nearby 

concentrations in determining whether to use such data for comparisons to the 2006 24-hour 

PM2.5 NAAQS.

Only complete quality-assured, quality-controlled, and certified PM2.5 data from Federal 

Reference Method (FRM), Federal Equivalent Method (FEM), or Approved Regional Method 

(ARM) monitors submitted to EPA's Air Quality System (AQS) can be used in the 24-hour 

design value calculations for comparing to the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS. Additionally, the

PM2.5 data must be collected from monitoring sites that are eligible for making comparisons with 

the 24-hour form of the PM2.5 NAAQS, as set forth in 40 CFR 58.30. 

D. Determination of Attainment

Upon a determination by EPA that an area designated nonattainment for the 2006 24-hour PM2.5

NAAQS has attained the standard, the requirements for such area to submit attainment 

demonstrations and associated RACM, RFP plans, contingency measures, and other planning 

SIPs related to attainment of the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 standard shall be suspended until such time 

as: the area is redesignated to attainment, at which time the requirements no longer apply; or 

EPA determines that the area has violated the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS, at which time the 

area is again required to submit such plans. See 40 CFR 51.1004(c). A determination of 

attainment is not equivalent to a redesignation, and the state must still meet the statutory 

requirements for redesignation in order to be redesignated to attainment. Furthermore, a

determination of attainment does not shield an area from other required actions such as New 

Source Review (NSR), conformity and emission inventory requirements, and provisions to 

address pollution transport, which would require emission reductions at sources or other types of 

emission activities contributing significantly to nonattainment in other areas or states, or 

interfering with maintenance in those areas. 

Determinations as to whether individual areas have attained the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 standard,

and thus qualify for the application of a determination of attainment, are being made in the 

context of rulemakings for individual areas. This determination of attainment of the Philadelphia 

Area for the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS is not linked to any particular attainment deadline, and 
5

is not necessarily equivalent to a determination that the Area has attained the standard by its 

applicable attainment deadline. 

III. EPA’S EVALUATION OF AIR QUALITY MONITORING DATA

A. Monitoring Network 

EPA previously determined that the PM2.5 monitoring network for the Philadelphia Area is 

adequate. EPA found that the number of monitors in the Area meets the minimum regulatory 

requirements given in 40 CFR part 58, appendix D, section 4.7, and that the monitoring network 

in place is in accordance with the States’ most recent annual monitoring network plans approved 

by EPA, as required by 40 CFR 58.10.2 During the periods of 2008-2010 and 2009-2011, the 

Philadelphia Area had in place a total of 16 PM2.5 monitoring sites, whose data was eligible for 

comparison to the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS.

B. Air Quality Monitoring Data

In order to determine that the Philadelphia Area attained the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 standard, 

quality-assured, quality-controlled and state certified ambient air monitoring data for the 

monitoring periods of 2008-2010 and 2009-2011 for the Philadelphia Area was reviewed. 

Preliminary PM2.5 data for 2012, which is not yet quality-assured and quality-controlled, was also 

reviewed. The PM2.5 monitoring data was measured by FRM, FEM, or ARM monitors, in 

accordance with 40 CFR part 50, appendix N. The monitoring data for periods 2008-2010 and 

2009-2011 for the Philadelphia Area is provided in Table 1 and Table 2, respectively. 

Preliminary 2012 monitoring data is provided in Table 3. See Appendix A-1 and A-2 of this 

document for AQS Preliminary Design Value Reports (AMP480). The PM2.5 98th percentile 

values and 24-hour design values for the Philadelphia Area can also be found at 

http://www.epa.gov/airtrends/values.html.

 

2

Separate ambient monitoring network plans are submitted annually to EPA by each of the States in the 24-hour 

PM2.5 Philadelphia Area. The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania’s 2011 annual ambient monitoring network plan was 

approved by EPA in a December 6, 2011 letter from Shawn M. Garvin, Regional Administrator, EPA Region III, to 

Michael L. Krancer, Secretary of the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (PADEP). The State of 

Delaware’s 2011 annual ambient monitoring network plan was approved by EPA in a December 6, 2011 letter from 

Shawn M. Garvin, Regional Administrator, EPA Region III, to Collin P. O’Mara, Secretary of the Delaware 

Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control (DNREC). The State of New Jersey’s 2011 annual 

ambient monitoring network plan was approved by EPA in an October 27, 2011 letter from John Filippelli, Acting 

Director of the Division of Environmental Planning and Protection, EPA Region II, to Jane Kozinski, Assistant 

Commissioner of the New Jersey Department of Environment Protection (NJDEP).
6

Table 1. Philadelphia Area’s 2008-2010 PM2.5 Air Quality Data (in μg/m3)

State County AQS Site ID

98th Percentile Value2

2008-2010 

24-hour 

Design 

Value

Completeness 

Status3

2008 2009 2010

Delaware New Castle 10-003-1003 31.6* 23.2 24.3 26 Max quarter

Delaware New Castle 10-003-1007 28.1 20.6* 27.5 25 Max quarter

Delaware New Castle 10-003-1012 28.6 23.4 24.9* 26 Max quarter

Delaware New Castle 10-003-2004 34.8 28.4 27.9 30 Complete

New Jersey Camden 34-007-0003 136.6 - - 37 Incomplete

New Jersey Camden 34-007-1007 28.0 25.0 23.4 25 Complete

New Jersey Gloucester 34-015-0004 23.9 21.9 21.6* 22 Max Quarter

Pennsylvania Bucks 42-017-0012 30.9* 25.8 28.3 28 Collocated

Pennsylvania Chester 42-029-0100 32.0 * 31.1 35.1 33 Incomplete 

Pennsylvania Delaware 42-045-0002 28.6 27.9 32.8 30 Complete

Pennsylvania Montgomery 42-091-0013 23.7 27.2 25.9 26 Complete

Pennsylvania Philadelphia 42-101-0004 34.5 25.9 27.6 29 Complete

Pennsylvania Philadelphia 42-101-0024 30.5 25.5 25.2 27 Complete

Pennsylvania Philadelphia 42-101-0047 32.8 27.2 27.6 29 Complete

Pennsylvania Philadelphia 42-101-0055 34.5 28.6 28.9 31 Complete

Pennsylvania Philadelphia 42-101-0057 32.8 28.3 27.9 30 Complete

1

 The Camden monitor at site 34-007-0003 was shut down September 2008.

2 Annual 98th percentile values not meeting the completeness criteria are marked with an asterisk (*). The dash (-) 

indicates that no data was collected during this time.

3

 This column indicates whether the monitoring data from the monitor meet the completeness requirement 

(Complete) or not (Incomplete) for each quarter of the 3-year period. “Max quarter” denotes that the monitor has 

incomplete data, but it passed the maximum quarter substitution test. “Collocated” indicates that the collocated data 

was substituted for missing data. Guidance on EPA’s substitution tests can be found in EPA’s April 1999 document 

“Guideline on Data Handling Conventions for the PM NAAQS.”

Table 2. Philadelphia Area’s 2009-2011 PM2.5 Air Quality Data (in μg/m3)

State County AQS Site ID

98th Percentile Value1 2009-2011 

24-hour 

Design 

Value

Completeness 

Status 2

2009 2010 2011

Delaware New Castle 10-003-1003 23.2 24.3 22.4* 23 Max quarter

Delaware New Castle 10-003-1007 20.6* 27.5 21.0 23 Max quarter

Delaware New Castle 10-003-1012 23.4 24.9 22.2* 24 Max quarter

Delaware New Castle 10-003-2004 28.4 27.9 24.7 27 Complete

New Jersey Camden 34-007-1007 25.0 23.4 24.3 24 Complete

New Jersey Gloucester 34-015-0004 21.9 21.6* 22.2 22 Max quarter
7

Pennsylvania Bucks 42-017-0012 25.8 28.3 29.7 28 Complete

Pennsylvania Chester 42-029-0100 31.1 35.1 33.8* 33 Incomplete

Pennsylvania Delaware 42-045-0002 27.9 32.8 28.6 30 Complete

Pennsylvania Montgomery 42-091-0013 27.2 25.9 27.6 27 Complete

Pennsylvania Philadelphia 42-101-0004 25.9 27.6 29.6 28 Complete

Pennsylvania Philadelphia 42-101-0024 25.5 25.2 - 25 Incomplete

Pennsylvania Philadelphia 42-101-0047 27.2 27.6 27.5 27 Complete

Pennsylvania Philadelphia 42-101-0055 28.6 28.9 30.6 29 Complete

Pennsylvania Philadelphia 42-101-0057 28.3 27.9 30.5 29 Complete

Pennsylvania Philadelphia 42-101-1002 - - 27.5 27 Incomplete

1

 Annual 98th percentile values not meeting the completeness criteria are marked with an asterisk (*). The dash (-) 

indicates that no data was collected during this time.

2

 This column indicates whether the monitoring data from the monitor meet the completeness requirement 

(Complete) or not (Incomplete) for each quarter of the 3-year period. “Max quarter” denotes that the monitor has 

incomplete data, but it has passed the maximum quarter substitution test. Guidance on EPA’s substitution tests can 

be found in EPA’s April 1999 document “Guideline on Data Handling Conventions for the PM NAAQS.”

Table 3. Philadelphia Area’s Preliminary 2012 PM2.5 Air Quality Data (in μg/m3)

State County AQS Site ID

2012 98th

Percentile 

Value 1

Delaware New Castle 10-003-1003 20.2

Delaware New Castle 10-003-1007 22.7

Delaware New Castle 10-003-1012 22.0

Delaware New Castle 10-003-2004 23.9

New Jersey Camden 34-007-1007 17.5

New Jersey Gloucester 34-015-0004 21.8

Pennsylvania Bucks 42-017-0012 34.9

Pennsylvania Chester 42-029-0100 21.0

Pennsylvania Delaware 42-045-0002 23.9

Pennsylvania Montgomery 42-091-0013 21.1

Pennsylvania Philadelphia 42-101-0004 27.9

Pennsylvania Philadelphia 42-101-0047 20.0

Pennsylvania Philadelphia 42-101-0055 19.6

Pennsylvania Philadelphia 42-101-0057 20.6

Pennsylvania Philadelphia 42-101-1002 23.4

1 Monitoring data available to date correspond to the first quarter of 2012, and have not been quality-assured, 

quality-controlled, or certified. 

EPA has reviewed the ambient air monitoring data for PM2.5 for monitoring periods 2008-2010 

and 2009-2011, consistent with the requirements contained in 40 CFR part 50. The 24-hour 

design value determined for the Philadelphia Area is the highest 3-year average of the annual 
8

98th percentile measured at all the monitors in the Area during this time, which meets the criteria 

to be used for comparison to the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS. During 2008-2010, the 

monitoring site 34-007-0003 in the Camden County was the highest reading monitor. However, 

the 24-hour design values at this site reflect incomplete data during most of the 2008-2010 

monitoring period due to the monitor’s shutdown in September 2008 (the monitor only collected 

data for 3 quarters out of 12). The last valid 24-hour design value at the site 34-007-0003 was 35 

μg/m3in 2006-2008, prior to its shut down. EPA has addressed the missing data during 2008-

2010 of monitoring site 34-007-0003 (Camden monitor) to determine a 24-hour design value had 

the monitor been operated during this time. For 2008-2010, the statistical procedure applied

results in an attaining 24-hour design value for the Camden monitor of 28 g/m3, which is below 

the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS of 35 μg/m3. (See section C- Data Completeness Issues of this 

document.) The remaining monitors in the Philadelphia area showed concentrations below the 

2006 24-hour PM2.5NAAQS during the 2008-2010 monitoring period.

For the 2009-2011 period, all monitors measured concentrations averaging below the 2006 24-

hour PM2.5 NAAQS of 35 ug/m3. The 24-hour design value for 2009-2011 for the Philadelphia 

Area is 33 ug/m3based on monitoring data collected at the Chester County monitor (New 

Garden monitor), site 42-029-0100. Because this monitor also shows incomplete monitoring 

data, EPA has computed a diagnostic 24-hour design value for the New Garden monitor after 

addressing the missing data. The statistical procedure applied results in an attaining 2009-2011 

diagnostic 24-hour design value for the Camden monitor of 33 g/m3, which is below the 2006 

24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS of 35 μg/m3. Therefore, ambient air monitoring data collected during 

2008-2010 and 2009-2011 in the Philadelphia Area indicates that the Area has attained the 2006 

24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS. Furthermore, preliminary 2012 PM2.5 data available to date, which has 

not yet been quality-assured or certified, shows that the 98th percentile values for the 1st quarter 

of 2012 are below the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS. 

C. Data Completeness Issues 

For the 2008-2010 and 2009-2011 periods, several monitors in the Philadelphia Area had

incomplete 24-hour design values, as indicated in the Completeness Status columns of Table 1 

and Table 2. In order to determine whether these monitors would have attained the 2006 24-hour 

PM2.5 NAAQS, EPA has addressed missing data from monitors not meeting the completeness 

requirement in accordance 40 CFR part 50 appendix N, by applying one of three different 

procedures: collocated substitution test, maximum quarter substitution test (“maximum quarter 

test”), and EPA’s statistical procedure. This section discusses the data completeness issues for

the PM2.5 monitors in the Philadelphia Area and how EPA has addressed the missing data during 

2008-2010 and 2009-2011 monitoring periods.

1. Monitoring Sites Shutdowns and Startups

Two monitors in the Philadelphia Area did not collect sufficient data during monitoring period

2009-2011. On January 1, 2011, the City of Philadelphia Air Management Services (AMS) 
9

began operating an NCore monitoring station, 42-101-1002. The NCore station is a multipollutant air monitoring station where the following is measured: carbon monoxide (CO), ozone, 

nitrogen oxides (NOx), sulfur dioxide (SO2), PM2.5, course particulate matter (PM10), and 

meteorological data. To alleviate the strain on resources caused by operating the NCore 

monitoring station, AMS discontinued their PM2.5 monitoring at site 42-101-0024 on January 1, 

2011. The last valid 24-hour design value of monitoring site 42-101-0024 was 27 ug/m3during 

2008-2010. EPA approved these changes to the monitoring network in the AMS 2010 Annual 

Network Plan. 

The abovementioned monitoring site 34-007-0003 (Camden monitor) in Camden County, New 

Jersey has an incomplete 24-hour design value for 2008-2010, since the monitor was shutdown 

permanently by New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP) in September 

2008. This was an unplanned shutdown due to vandalism at the site, but was reported to and 

approved by EPA. A new monitoring site, 34-007-0002, was installed in Camden County as a 

replacement on April 11, 2012.

2. Data Substitution Tests 

Several monitors in the Philadelphia Area were not meeting the completeness requirement for 

one or more year during 2008-2010 and 2009-2011 monitoring periods. EPA applied the 

maximum quarter data substitution test (maximum quarter test) to each of these monitors, as 

described in the EPA’s April 1999 guidance document “Guideline on Data Handling 

Conventions for the PM NAAQS.” In the maximum quarter test, maximum recorded values are 

substituted for the missing data, and the resulting 24-hour design value is compared to the 2006 

24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS. A monitor with incomplete data passes the test if the 24-hour design 

value with maximum values substituted meets the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS. Specifically, the

maximum quarter test requires replacing the missing data with the maximum concentration 

recorded at the site during the same quarter over the three-year period in question, provided that 

the following criteria are met. The site must have valid data for at least 50 percent of the 

scheduled number of samples for each quarter for all three years, and the emissions and 

meteorology for the quarters to be substituted must be comparable to the emissions and 

meteorology for the quarters in question. The “Completeness Status” columns of Table 1 and 

Table 2 indicate which incomplete monitors passed the maximum quarter test, and therefore 

attain the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS.

The collocated substitution test was applied to the incomplete primary monitor at site 42-017-

0012 to address missing data in 2008. In the collocated substitution test, data from a collocated 

monitor are substituted for the missing data of the primary monitor at the site. Data from a 

collocated monitor for the same year and quarter as the missing data may be used to replace the 

missing PM2.5 values. If collocated data do not correspond to the same day as the scheduled 

sampling, then collocated data from the nearest day (i.e. within a day or two) may be used to 

replace the missing data. The emissions and meteorology for the substituted day must be 

comparative to emissions and meteorology for the missing day. The collocated monitor must be 

a FRM or FEM, or must be a collocated quality-assured monitor. In order to determine if the 

monitor meets the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 standard, the 24-hour design value computed with the 
10

substituted 98th percentiles should remain under the standard. This is the case for monitoring site

42-017-0012. The values from the collocated monitor at site 42-017-0012 are reflected in the 

98% percentile value for 2008 in Table 1. For more information on this substitution techniques, 

see EPA’s April 1999 “Guideline on Data Handling Conventions for the PM NAAQS,” available 

at http://www.epa.gov/ttn/oarpg/t1/memoranda/pmfinal.pdf.

3. Data Completeness for Incomplete Monitors in the Philadelphia Area during 2008-2010 

and 2009-2011 

The Philadelphia Area has two additional monitoring sites without a valid attaining 24-hour 

design value for 2008-2010 and 2009-2011 monitoring periods due to incomplete data.

Monitoring site 42-029-0100 (New Garden monitor) in Chester County, Pennsylvania has an 

incomplete 24-hour design value for both monitoring periods 2008-2010 and 2009-2011, due to 

various mechanical issues in 2008 and power failures in 2011. Monitoring site 34-007-0003

(Camden monitor), had an incomplete design value for 2008-2010 due to the monitor being shut 

down in September 2008.

EPA addressed the missing data of these two monitors by applying a statistical procedure in 

order to determine a “diagnostic” 24-hour design value for the Camden monitor (site 34-007-

0003) for 2008-2010 and “diagnostic” 24-hour design values for the New Garden monitor (site 

42-029-0100) for both 2008-2010 and 2009-2011 periods. EPA’s statistical procedure is 

described in the following sections.

a. Method Description

The general concept of the statistical method used is to determine whether an incomplete monitor 

(target monitor) would have met the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 standard by replacing the missing data 

of the target monitor with data from another monitor (candidate monitor) located within or in the 

vicinity of the nonattainment area. The first step of the statistical method is to establish a linear 

regression relationship between the target monitor and the candidate monitor, and then to use the 

linear regression to fill in the missing data for the target monitor in any quarter of the three-year 

period that did not satisfy the 75 percent completeness requirements based on actual 

observations. A “diagnostic” 24-hour design value for the monitoring period is calculated with 

the imputed data and then checked with an additional statistical technique, referred as 

bootstrapping, to verify if the monitor has attained the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS. The 

diagnostic 24-hour design value is used to judge whether these locations would likely have 

monitored attainment of the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS had the monitors collected complete 

valid data during this time. 

The candidate monitor is selected based on 3 different aspects: correlation value, quarterly data 

captured, and site pairing. The correlation value (R2) from the linear regression should indicate a 

“strong” linear relationship of the PM2.5 data from the candidate monitor and the target monitor. 

Then, the mean of the quarterly data captured (expressed in percentage), which provides the 

average data collection rate at each site, should determine that the site has sufficient data during 
11

the missing period of the target monitor. Additionally, pairing the site data assists in establishing 

more precise comparisons with fewer observations.

The PM2.5 monitoring network within the Philadelphia Area has 16 PM2.5 monitoring locations, 

providing an ample number of monitors to compare to the target monitor. The target monitors in 

these analyses are the New Garden and Camden monitors. The methodology was used to 

appropriately fill in the missing data for these two monitors, to judge whether each monitoring 

location would likely have monitored attainment of the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS had each

monitor collected complete valid data during this time. For the 2008-2010 period, monitoring 

site 10-003-1012 (Newark monitor) in Delaware was selected as the candidate monitor for the 

New Garden monitor and site 34-007-1007 (Camden WTP monitor) in New Jersey was selected 

for the Camden monitor. For the 2009-2011 period, monitoring site 10-003-1003 (Bellefonte 

monitor) in Delaware was selected as the candidate monitor for the New Garden monitor.

b. Eligibility

EPA established criteria to assure that the diagnostic 24-hour design values of the Camden 

monitor for 2008-2010 and the New Garden monitor for 2008-2010 and 2009-2011 were robust 

enough to allow consideration of the results in a weight of evidence decision. EPA established 

criteria for both the operating period of the candidate monitor and for the number of days of 

samples that the candidate monitor and each of the target monitors have in common. EPA has 

not established bright lines or specific requirements for determining diagnostic 24-hour design 

values for monitors with less than complete data.

Operating Time

In order to establish a significant relationship between the monitors, the candidate monitor must 

have operated during the monitoring period with the missing data in the Philadelphia Area. The 

candidate monitor is not required to have complete data in all 12 quarters of each 3-year period, 

yet should have collected sufficient observations to fill in the missing days of the target monitor, 

for the target monitor to satisfy the 75 percent completeness in each quarter. 

Paired samples

Pairs of sample data for the target monitors and candidate monitors from the most recent 20-

quarter period of operation of the target monitor were used. The “period of operation” of the 

target monitor was based on the date of the last reported sample from the monitor. The candidate 

monitor had at least 100 historical sample pairs in common with the target monitor during this 

period. When there were more than 100 pairs in the 20-quarter period all available pairs were 

used. In addition to the 100 pairs over the 20 quarters, candidate monitors had at least 20 paired 

days of data in common with the target monitor for each calendar quarter (adding together the 

number of days in a given calendar quarter [Q1, Q2, Q3, or Q4] across the 20-quarter period). 

Several candidate sites met the eligibility criteria of 100 pairs over the 20-quarters, and at least 

20 paired days of data in common with the target monitors for each calendar quarter. 
12

c. Method for Determining 24-hour Design Values

The following includes a step-by-step explanation of the methodology used to determine the 

diagnostic 24-hour design values for the target monitors (New Garden and Camden). Results are 

discussed in detail in the following section.

Step 1 – Organize data and perform linear regression(s) between target monitor and possible 

candidate monitors.

All the available paired data within the period limit (see the Eligibility section) was used to 

develop a linear regression to predict target concentrations from candidate concentrations. A 

regression was performed for each possible pairing that met the criteria utilized for 100 data 

points and 20 data points per calendar quarter (across all years) in the most recent 20 quarters for 

each candidate monitor in the Philadelphia nonattainment area.

Step 2 – Select Candidate site

The following steps were used to select the candidate monitor, during each monitoring period: 

(1) All possible candidate monitors were placed in order of highest correlation (based on 

the highest R2of the linear regression) with the target monitor. 

(2) Using the regression equation relating concentrations at the target monitor and the 

candidate monitor, estimates of the 24-hour average concentrations were made at the target 

monitor for all missing scheduled days in the initially incomplete quarter, during the most recent 

three-year period at the target monitor. Estimates were only made for days on which a 

concentration is available at the candidate monitor. Estimates were not made for any days in the 

quarter for which the target monitor had 75 percent or more complete data initially. The 

estimates were combined with any reported data at the target monitor during the recent 3-year 

period, and the data capture rates were computed for the originally incomplete quarter. The 

computation of these data capture rates was based on the assumption that the required sampling 

frequency for the target monitor was recorded. If the candidate monitor had a lower sampling 

frequency than the target monitor, some missing scheduled days for the target were not 

substituted for the regression-based estimates. When the candidate monitor had a lower 

sampling frequency than the target monitor, the target monitor sampling schedule was assumed 

to be a combination of the target and candidate monitors schedules, weighted by the number of 

originally present and originally missing scheduled days at the target monitor. 

(3) If after performing the process in step 2, the results produced all 12 quarters at the 

target monitor having at least 75 percent of scheduled values, the candidate monitor was selected 

as the candidate for the remaining steps. If the 75 percent of the scheduled values for the target 

monitor were not obtained, then step 2 was repeated for the next best correlated site. This 

process was repeated until the target monitor had 75 percent of its scheduled values.

Step 3 – Diagnostic 24-hour Design Value Computed
13

The diagnostic three-year averaged 24-hour design values for 2008-2010 and 2009-2011 were 

calculated using the actual observations of the target monitor and the regression-based estimates 

of daily concentrations. The diagnostic 24-hour design values for 2008-2010 and 2009-2011 

computed for the New Garden and Camden monitors in the Philadelphia Area were below the 

2006 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS level of 35.0 ug/m3. 

Step 4 – Statistical confidence of a 24-hour design value below the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS

In order to show that there is, at most, a 10 percent probability that the actual 24-hour design 

values (had each one of these monitors operated more days) were above the 2006 24-hour PM2.5

NAAQS, further analysis was performed as follows:

(1) Residuals were calculated from the regression.

(2) A bootstrap analysis was performed, repeating the regression-based substitution in 

Step 2 but adding to each estimated 24-hour value that substitutes for a missing scheduled 

monitored value a plus or minus residual that has been randomly drawn (with 

replacement) from the pool of regression residuals. This step randomly applies real 

residuals from the linear regression to the imputed current-period target values.

(3) Repeat (2) for a total of 1000 runs. 

(4) For each of the 1000 bootstrap trials, the 3-year design value was calculated. This 

will provide a pseudo confidence interval for the partially imputed current-period design 

value for the target.

(5) Since none of the 1000 runs resulted in diagnostic 24-hour design values for 2008-

2010 were above the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS, the New Garden and Camden 

monitors were considered to have met the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS during the 2008-

2010 period. Similarly, since none of the 1000 runs resulted in diagnostic 24-hour design 

values for 2009-2011 above the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS, the New Garden monitor 

was considered to have met the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS during the 2009-2011 

period.

For determining the diagnostic 24-hour design values for the each incomplete monitor, Steps 1 

and 2 were performed separately for each of the monitors as the target monitor and for each 

monitoring period, as needed.

d. Statistical Results of Incomplete Monitors

This section provides a discussion of the statistical results obtained from filling the incomplete 

data of the New Garden (site 42-029-0100) and Camden (site 34-007-0003) monitors for 2008-

2010 and 2009-2011 monitoring periods. Results for each step are provided in figures of

Appendix B-1 “Statistical Results for Computation of 2008-2010 Diagnostic 24-hour PM2.5
14

Design Values of Monitoring Sites 42-029-0100 and 34-007-0003 in the PhiladelphiaWilmington Nonattainment Area” and Appendix B-2 “Statistical Results for Computation of

2009-2011 Diagnostic 24-hour PM2.5 Design Values for Monitoring Site 42-029-0100 in the 

Philadelphia-Wilmington Nonattainment Area” of this document. Table 4 below presents the

diagnostic 24-hour design values computed through this procedure for the target monitors for 

2008-2010 and 2009-2011 monitoring periods.

Table 4. Diagnostic 24-hour Design Values Computed through EPA’s Statistical Procedure 

for Incomplete Monitors in the Philadelphia Area (in μg/m3)

State County Monitor 

Name AQS Site ID Monitoring Period

Diagnostic 24-

hour Design 

Value

New Jersey Camden Camden 34-007-0003 2008-2010 28

Pennsylvania Chester New Garden 42-029-0100 2008-2010 33

Pennsylvania Chester New Garden 42-029-0100 2009-2010 33

2008-2010 24-hour Design Value for the New Garden Monitor (site 42-029-0100)

Figure 2 shows the 2008-2010 24-hour design values and data capture for each monitoring site in 

the Philadelphia Area. In Figure 2, the target monitor, New Garden (site 42-029-0100), is listed 

as Site A1 and the candidate site, Newark (site 10-003-1012), is listed as Site B1. The Newark 

monitor had the highest correlation with New Garden and met the operating period and paired 

data eligibility criteria for being a candidate site. The results of the linear regression between the 

New Garden and Newark monitors for the 2008-2010 24-hour design value are shown in Figure 

3. Estimates for all deficient quarterly data for 2008-2010 were made. As a result of filling in 

the missing data, the New Garden monitor now had all complete data for 2008-2010. A 2008-

2010 diagnostic 24-hour design value of 33 g/m3 was calculated for the New Garden monitor 

(see Figure 4). The statistical confidence of the design value was checked using the method 

outlined in Step 4. None of the 1000 bootstrapping trials resulted in a violating design value, 

which provides statistical confidence that the New Garden monitor is attaining the 2006 24-hour 

PM2.5 NAAQS. The results of the 1000 bootstrap trials are provided in Figure 5.

2008-2010 24-hour Design Value for the Camden Monitor (site 34-007-0103)

Figure 6 shows the 2008-2010 24-hour design values and data capture for each monitoring site in 

the Philadelphia nonattainment area. In Figure 6, the target monitor, Camden (site 34-007-0003) 

is listed as Site A2, and the candidate site, Camden Water Treatment Plant (site 34-007-1007), is 

listed as Site B2. The air monitor at the Municipal Maintenance Yard site in Gloucester County, 

New Jersey (site 34-015-0004) had the highest correlation with the Camden monitor but did not 

have sufficient paired data in all quarters. The Camden Water Treatment Plant monitor had the 

next highest correlation with the Camden monitor and met the operating period and paired data 

eligibility criteria for being a candidate site. The results of the linear regression between the 
15

Camden and Camden Water Treatment Plant monitors for determining the 2008-2010 24-hour 

design value are shown in Figure 7. Estimates for the missing data during the 2008-2010 period 

were made. As a result of filling in the missing data, the Camden monitor now had all complete 

data for 2008-2010. Then a 2008-2010 diagnostic 24-hour design value of 28 g/m3 was 

calculated for the Camden monitor (see Figure 8). The statistical confidence of the design value 

was checked using the method outlined in Step 4. None of the 1000 bootstrapping trials resulted 

in a violating design value, which provides statistical confidence that the Camden monitor is 

attaining the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS. The results of the 1000 bootstrap trials are provided 

in Figure 9. 

2009-2011 24-hour Design Value for the New Garden Monitor (site 42-029-0100)

Figure 11 shows the 2009-2011 24-hour design values and data capture for each monitoring site 

in the Philadelphia Area. In Figure 11, the target monitor, New Garden (site 42-029-0100), is 

listed as Site A3 and the candidate site, Bellefonte (site 10-003-1003), is listed as Site B3. The 

Newark monitor, site 10-003-1012, has the highest correlation with New Garden monitor and has 

sufficient paired data in all quarters to establish a good relationship with the New Garden

monitor. However, this site is incomplete in the same quarter as the New Garden monitor and 

thus cannot produce sufficient estimates for that quarter. For that reason, the Bellefonte monitor

(site 10-003-1003) has been chosen as the candidate site, since it has the next highest correlation 

with the New Garden monitor and met the operating period and paired data eligibility criteria. 

The results of the linear regression between the New Garden and Bellefonte monitors for 2009-

2011 24-hour design value are shown in Figure 12. Estimates for all deficient quarterly data for 

2009-2011 were made. As a result of filling in the missing data, the New Garden monitor now 

had all complete data for 2009-2011. A 2009-2011 diagnostic 24-hour design value of 33 g/m3

was calculated for the New Garden monitor (see Figure 13). The statistical confidence of the 

design value was checked using the method outlined in Step 4. None of the 1000 bootstrapping 

trials resulted in a violating design value, which provides statistical confidence that the New 

Garden monitor is attaining the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS. The results of the 1000 bootstrap 

trials are provided in Figure 14.

V. RECOMMENDED AGENCY ACTION

Based on the most recent quality-assured, quality-controlled, and state certified ambient air 

monitoring data of the Philadelphia Area for 2008-2010 and 2009-2011 monitoring periods, EPA 

proposes to determine that the Philadelphia Area has attained the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS. 

This determination of attainment will suspend the attainment-related SIP requirements for the 

2006 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS for the Area, pursuant to 40 CFR 51.1004(c). 

Attachments:

- Appendix A-1: EPA AQS Preliminary Design Value Report (AMP480) dated July 10, 2012, 

containing air quality data for 2008-2010, 2009-2011, and preliminary 2012 for the following 

portions of the Philadelphia Area: Delaware, New Jersey, and Bucks and Chester Counties in
16

Pennsylvania 

- Appendix A-2: EPA AQS Preliminary Design Value Report (AMP480) dated July 10, 2012, 

containing air quality data for 2008-2010, 2009-2011, and preliminary 2012 for the remaining 

Pennsylvania portion of the Philadelphia Area 

- Appendix B-1: Statistical Results for Computation of 2008-2010 Diagnostic 24-hour PM2.5

Design Values of Monitoring Sites 42-029-0100 and 34-007-0003 in the PhiladelphiaWilmington Nonattainment Area

- Appendix B-2: Statistical Results for Computation of 2009-2011 Diagnostic 24-hour PM2.5

Design Values of Monitoring Site 42-029-0100 in the Philadelphia-Wilmington 

Nonattainment Area

- Appendix C-1: EPA’s approval of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania’s 2011 Ambient Air 

Monitoring Network Plan.

- Appendix C-2: EPA’s approval of the State of Delaware’s 2011 Ambient Air Monitoring 

Network Plan.

- Appendix C-3: EPA’s approval of the State of New Jersey’s 2011 Ambient air Monitoring 

Network Plan.

- Appendix D: New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection’s request to EPA for the 

determination of attainment of the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 for the Philadelphia Area
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

DESIGN VALUE REPORT

Report Request ID: 1004162 Report Code: AMP480 Jul. 10, 2012

Selection Criteria Page 1

User ID: HXN

State County Site Parameter POC City AQCR UAR CBSA CSA

EPA

Region Method Duration Begin Date End Date

10

10

10

10

34

34

42

42

003

003

003

003

007

015

017

029

2004

1003

1007

1012

1007

0004

0012

0100

88101

88101

88101

88101

88101

88101

88101

88101

GEOGRAPHIC SELECTIONS

SELECTED OPTIONS

USER SITE METADATA

MERGE PDF FILES

QUARTERLY DATA IN WORKFILE

WORKFILE DELIMITER

SINGLE EVENT PROCESSING

Option Type Option Value

STREET ADDRESS

YES

NO

,

EXCLUDE REGIONALLY CONCURRED EVENTS

GLOBAL DATES

2010

Start Date End Date

2012

Tribal

Code

APPLICABLE STANDARDS

Standard Description

PM25 24-hour 2006

PM25 Annual 2006

Appendix A-1
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

PRELIMINARY DESIGN VALUE REPORT

Report Date: Jul. 10, 2012

Notes: 1. Computed design values are a snapshot of the data at the time the report was run (may not be all data for year). 

 2. Some PM2.5 24-hour DVs for incomplete data that are marked invalid here may be marked valid in the Official report due to additional analysis.

 3. Annual Values not meeting completeness criteria are marked with an asterisk ('*').

Page 1 of 10

Appendix A-1
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

PRELIMINARY DESIGN VALUE REPORT

Report Date: Jul. 10, 2012

Notes: 1. Computed design values are a snapshot of the data at the time the report was run (may not be all data for year). 

 2. Some PM2.5 24-hour DVs for incomplete data that are marked invalid here may be marked valid in the Official report due to additional analysis.

 3. Annual Values not meeting completeness criteria are marked with an asterisk ('*').

Page 2 of 10

Pollutant:

Standard Units:

NAAQS Standard:

Statistic:

Statistic:

Site-LevelPM2.5 - Local Conditions(88101)

Micrograms/cubic meter (LC)(105)

PM25 24-hour 2006 / PM25 Annual 2006

Annual Weighted Mean

Annual 98th Percentile

Level:

Level:

Design Value Year: 2010

REPORT EXCLUDES MEASUREMENTS WITH REGIONALLY CONCURRED EVENT FLAGS.

15

35 State Name: Delaware

Site_ID /

STREET ADDRESS

|

|

|

Cred.

Days

Comp.

Qrtrs

Wtd.

Mean 

98th

Perctil Cert.

|

|

|

Cred.

Days

Comp.

Qrtrs

98th

Perctil

Wtd.

Mean Cert.

|

|

|

Cred.

Days

Comp.

Qrtrs

98th

Perctil

Wtd.

Mean Cert.

|

|

|

Design

Value

Valid

Ind.

|

|

|

Design

Value

Valid

Ind.

24-Hour Annual 2010 2009 2008

10-003-1003

10-003-1007

10-003-1012

10-003-2004

RIVER ROAD PARK, BELLEFONTE

LUMS POND STATE PARK

UNIV. DE NORTH CAMPUS

MLK BLVD AND JUSTISON ST.

116

114

103

346

4

4

3

4

 24.3

 27.5

 24.9

 27.9

*

 10.2

 10.0

 10.4

 10.6

*

N

N

N

N

102

101

114

347

4

3

4

4

 23.2

 20.6

 23.4

 28.4

*

 10.2

 10.0

 10.6

 11.2

*

N

N

N

N

99

108

108

324

3

4

4

4

 31.6

 28.1

 28.6

 34.8

* 13.0

 11.5

 12.5

 13.5

* Y

Y

Y

Y

 26

 25

 26

 30

N

N

N

Y

 11.1

 10.5

 11.2

 11.7

N

N

N

Y

Appendix A-1
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

PRELIMINARY DESIGN VALUE REPORT

Report Date: Jul. 10, 2012

Notes: 1. Computed design values are a snapshot of the data at the time the report was run (may not be all data for year). 

 2. Some PM2.5 24-hour DVs for incomplete data that are marked invalid here may be marked valid in the Official report due to additional analysis.

 3. Annual Values not meeting completeness criteria are marked with an asterisk ('*').

Page 3 of 10

Pollutant:

Standard Units:

NAAQS Standard:

Statistic:

Statistic:

Site-LevelPM2.5 - Local Conditions(88101)

Micrograms/cubic meter (LC)(105)

PM25 24-hour 2006 / PM25 Annual 2006

Annual Weighted Mean

Annual 98th Percentile

Level:

Level:

Design Value Year: 2011

REPORT EXCLUDES MEASUREMENTS WITH REGIONALLY CONCURRED EVENT FLAGS.

15

35 State Name: Delaware

Site_ID /

STREET ADDRESS

|

|

|

Cred.

Days

Comp.

Qrtrs

Wtd.

Mean 

98th

Perctil Cert.

|

|

|

Cred.

Days

Comp.

Qrtrs

98th

Perctil

Wtd.

Mean Cert.

|

|

|

Cred.

Days

Comp.

Qrtrs

98th

Perctil

Wtd.

Mean Cert.

|

|

|

Design

Value

Valid

Ind.

|

|

|

Design

Value

Valid

Ind.

24-Hour Annual 2011 2010 2009

10-003-1003

10-003-1007

10-003-1012

10-003-2004

RIVER ROAD PARK, BELLEFONTE

LUMS POND STATE PARK

UNIV. DE NORTH CAMPUS

MLK BLVD AND JUSTISON ST.

108

104

106

329

3

4

3

4

 22.4

 21.0

 22.2

 24.7

*

*

 9.4

 8.8

 10.4

 10.3

*

*

N

N

N

N

116

114

103

346

4

4

3

4

 24.3

 27.5

 24.9

 27.9

*

 10.2

 10.0

 10.4

 10.6

*

N

N

N

N

102

101

114

347

4

3

4

4

 23.2

 20.6

 23.4

 28.4

*

 10.2

 10.0

 10.6

 11.2

*

N

N

N

N

 23

 23

 24

 27

N

N

N

Y

 9.9

 9.6

 10.5

 10.7

N

N

N

Y

Appendix A-1
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

PRELIMINARY DESIGN VALUE REPORT

Report Date: Jul. 10, 2012

Notes: 1. Computed design values are a snapshot of the data at the time the report was run (may not be all data for year). 

 2. Some PM2.5 24-hour DVs for incomplete data that are marked invalid here may be marked valid in the Official report due to additional analysis.

 3. Annual Values not meeting completeness criteria are marked with an asterisk ('*').

Page 4 of 10

Pollutant:

Standard Units:

NAAQS Standard:

Statistic:

Statistic:

Site-LevelPM2.5 - Local Conditions(88101)

Micrograms/cubic meter (LC)(105)

PM25 24-hour 2006 / PM25 Annual 2006

Annual Weighted Mean

Annual 98th Percentile

Level:

Level:

Design Value Year: 2012

REPORT EXCLUDES MEASUREMENTS WITH REGIONALLY CONCURRED EVENT FLAGS.

15

35 State Name: Delaware

Site_ID /

STREET ADDRESS

|

|

|

Cred.

Days

Comp.

Qrtrs

Wtd.

Mean 

98th

Perctil Cert.

|

|

|

Cred.

Days

Comp.

Qrtrs

98th

Perctil

Wtd.

Mean Cert.

|

|

|

Cred.

Days

Comp.

Qrtrs

98th

Perctil

Wtd.

Mean Cert.

|

|

|

Design

Value

Valid

Ind.

|

|

|

Design

Value

Valid

Ind.

24-Hour Annual 2012 2011 2010

10-003-1003

10-003-1007

10-003-1012

10-003-2004

RIVER ROAD PARK, BELLEFONTE

LUMS POND STATE PARK

UNIV. DE NORTH CAMPUS

MLK BLVD AND JUSTISON ST.

40

37

41

115

1

1

1

1

 20.2

 22.7

 22.0

 23.9

*

*

*

*

 8.2

 7.5

 8.4

 9.3

*

*

*

*

N

N

N

N

108

104

106

329

3

4

3

4

 22.4

 21.0

 22.2

 24.7

*

*

 9.4

 8.8

 10.4

 10.3

*

*

N

N

N

N

116

114

103

346

4

4

3

4

 24.3

 27.5

 24.9

 27.9

*

 10.2

 10.0

 10.4

 10.6

*

N

N

N

N

 22

 24

 23

 26

N

N

N

N

 9.2

 8.8

 9.7

 10.0

N

N

N

N

Appendix A-1
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

PRELIMINARY DESIGN VALUE REPORT

Report Date: Jul. 10, 2012

Notes: 1. Computed design values are a snapshot of the data at the time the report was run (may not be all data for year). 

 2. Some PM2.5 24-hour DVs for incomplete data that are marked invalid here may be marked valid in the Official report due to additional analysis.

 3. Annual Values not meeting completeness criteria are marked with an asterisk ('*').

Page 5 of 10

Pollutant:

Standard Units:

NAAQS Standard:

Statistic:

Statistic:

Site-LevelPM2.5 - Local Conditions(88101)

Micrograms/cubic meter (LC)(105)

PM25 24-hour 2006 / PM25 Annual 2006

Annual Weighted Mean

Annual 98th Percentile

Level:

Level:

Design Value Year: 2010

REPORT EXCLUDES MEASUREMENTS WITH REGIONALLY CONCURRED EVENT FLAGS.

15

35 State Name: New Jersey

Site_ID /

STREET ADDRESS

|

|

|

Cred.

Days

Comp.

Qrtrs

Wtd.

Mean 

98th

Perctil Cert.

|

|

|

Cred.

Days

Comp.

Qrtrs

98th

Perctil

Wtd.

Mean Cert.

|

|

|

Cred.

Days

Comp.

Qrtrs

98th

Perctil

Wtd.

Mean Cert.

|

|

|

Design

Value

Valid

Ind.

|

|

|

Design

Value

Valid

Ind.

24-Hour Annual 2010 2009 2008

34-007-1007

34-015-0004

Morris Delair Water Treatment Plant, off Griffith-Morgan Lane

Municipal Maintenance Yard, North School Street, North of Morse Avenue

117

107

4

3

 23.4

 21.6*

 9.5

 9.1*

N

N

115

116

4

4

 25.0

 21.9

 9.5

 9.3

N

N

107

109

4

4

 28.0

 23.9

 11.9

 11.5

N

N

 25

 22

Y

N

 10.3

 10.0

Y

N

Appendix A-1
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

PRELIMINARY DESIGN VALUE REPORT

Report Date: Jul. 10, 2012

Notes: 1. Computed design values are a snapshot of the data at the time the report was run (may not be all data for year). 

 2. Some PM2.5 24-hour DVs for incomplete data that are marked invalid here may be marked valid in the Official report due to additional analysis.

 3. Annual Values not meeting completeness criteria are marked with an asterisk ('*').

Page 6 of 10

Pollutant:

Standard Units:

NAAQS Standard:

Statistic:

Statistic:

Site-LevelPM2.5 - Local Conditions(88101)

Micrograms/cubic meter (LC)(105)

PM25 24-hour 2006 / PM25 Annual 2006

Annual Weighted Mean

Annual 98th Percentile

Level:

Level:

Design Value Year: 2011

REPORT EXCLUDES MEASUREMENTS WITH REGIONALLY CONCURRED EVENT FLAGS.

15

35 State Name: New Jersey

Site_ID /

STREET ADDRESS

|

|

|

Cred.

Days

Comp.

Qrtrs

Wtd.

Mean 

98th

Perctil Cert.

|

|

|

Cred.

Days

Comp.

Qrtrs

98th

Perctil

Wtd.

Mean Cert.

|

|

|

Cred.

Days

Comp.

Qrtrs

98th

Perctil

Wtd.

Mean Cert.

|

|

|

Design

Value

Valid

Ind.

|

|

|

Design

Value

Valid

Ind.

24-Hour Annual 2011 2010 2009

34-007-1007

34-015-0004

Morris Delair Water Treatment Plant, off Griffith-Morgan Lane

Municipal Maintenance Yard, North School Street, North of Morse Avenue

118

116

4

4

 24.3

 22.2

 10.1

 9.4

N

N

117

107

4

3

 23.4

 21.6*

 9.5

 9.1 *

N

N

115

116

4

4

 25.0

 21.9

 9.5

 9.3

N

N

 24

 22

Y

N

 9.7

 9.3

Y

N

Appendix A-1
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

PRELIMINARY DESIGN VALUE REPORT

Report Date: Jul. 10, 2012

Notes: 1. Computed design values are a snapshot of the data at the time the report was run (may not be all data for year). 

 2. Some PM2.5 24-hour DVs for incomplete data that are marked invalid here may be marked valid in the Official report due to additional analysis.

 3. Annual Values not meeting completeness criteria are marked with an asterisk ('*').

Page 7 of 10

Pollutant:

Standard Units:

NAAQS Standard:

Statistic:

Statistic:

Site-LevelPM2.5 - Local Conditions(88101)

Micrograms/cubic meter (LC)(105)

PM25 24-hour 2006 / PM25 Annual 2006

Annual Weighted Mean

Annual 98th Percentile

Level:

Level:

Design Value Year: 2012

REPORT EXCLUDES MEASUREMENTS WITH REGIONALLY CONCURRED EVENT FLAGS.

15

35 State Name: New Jersey

Site_ID /

STREET ADDRESS

|

|

|

Cred.

Days

Comp.

Qrtrs

Wtd.

Mean 

98th

Perctil Cert.

|

|

|

Cred.

Days

Comp.

Qrtrs

98th

Perctil

Wtd.

Mean Cert.

|

|

|

Cred.

Days

Comp.

Qrtrs

98th

Perctil

Wtd.

Mean Cert.

|

|

|

Design

Value

Valid

Ind.

|

|

|

Design

Value

Valid

Ind.

24-Hour Annual 2012 2011 2010

34-007-1007

34-015-0004

Morris Delair Water Treatment Plant, off Griffith-Morgan Lane

Municipal Maintenance Yard, North School Street, North of Morse Avenue

30

31

1

1

 17.5

 21.8

*

*

 8.6

 9.3

*

*

N

N

118

116

4

4

 24.3

 22.2

 10.1

 9.4

N

N

117

107

4

3

 23.4

 21.6*

 9.5

 9.1*

N

N

 22

 22

N

N

 9.4

 9.3

N

N

Appendix A-1
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

PRELIMINARY DESIGN VALUE REPORT

Report Date: Jul. 10, 2012

Notes: 1. Computed design values are a snapshot of the data at the time the report was run (may not be all data for year). 

 2. Some PM2.5 24-hour DVs for incomplete data that are marked invalid here may be marked valid in the Official report due to additional analysis.

 3. Annual Values not meeting completeness criteria are marked with an asterisk ('*').

Page 8 of 10

Pollutant:

Standard Units:

NAAQS Standard:

Statistic:

Statistic:

Site-LevelPM2.5 - Local Conditions(88101)

Micrograms/cubic meter (LC)(105)

PM25 24-hour 2006 / PM25 Annual 2006

Annual Weighted Mean

Annual 98th Percentile

Level:

Level:

Design Value Year: 2010

REPORT EXCLUDES MEASUREMENTS WITH REGIONALLY CONCURRED EVENT FLAGS.

15

35 State Name: Pennsylvania

Site_ID /

STREET ADDRESS

|

|

|

Cred.

Days

Comp.

Qrtrs

Wtd.

Mean 

98th

Perctil Cert.

|

|

|

Cred.

Days

Comp.

Qrtrs

98th

Perctil

Wtd.

Mean Cert.

|

|

|

Cred.

Days

Comp.

Qrtrs

98th

Perctil

Wtd.

Mean Cert.

|

|

|

Design

Value

Valid

Ind.

|

|

|

Design

Value

Valid

Ind.

24-Hour Annual 2010 2009 2008

42-017-0012

42-029-0100

ROCKVIEW LANE

NEW GARDEN AIRPORT - TOUGHKENAMON

354

341

4

4

 28.3

 35.1

 10.5

 13.8

N

N

319

332

4

4

 25.8

 31.1

 10.8

 14.1

N

N

103

102

3

3

 30.9

 32.0

*

*

 12.7

 13.7

*

*

Y

Y

 28

 33

N

N

 11.3

 13.8

N

N

Appendix A-1
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

PRELIMINARY DESIGN VALUE REPORT

Report Date: Jul. 10, 2012

Notes: 1. Computed design values are a snapshot of the data at the time the report was run (may not be all data for year). 

 2. Some PM2.5 24-hour DVs for incomplete data that are marked invalid here may be marked valid in the Official report due to additional analysis.

 3. Annual Values not meeting completeness criteria are marked with an asterisk ('*').

Page 9 of 10

Pollutant:

Standard Units:

NAAQS Standard:

Statistic:

Statistic:

Site-LevelPM2.5 - Local Conditions(88101)

Micrograms/cubic meter (LC)(105)

PM25 24-hour 2006 / PM25 Annual 2006

Annual Weighted Mean

Annual 98th Percentile

Level:

Level:

Design Value Year: 2011

REPORT EXCLUDES MEASUREMENTS WITH REGIONALLY CONCURRED EVENT FLAGS.

15

35 State Name: Pennsylvania

Site_ID /

STREET ADDRESS

|

|

|

Cred.

Days

Comp.

Qrtrs

Wtd.

Mean 

98th

Perctil Cert.

|

|

|

Cred.

Days

Comp.

Qrtrs

98th

Perctil

Wtd.

Mean Cert.

|

|

|

Cred.

Days

Comp.

Qrtrs

98th

Perctil

Wtd.

Mean Cert.

|

|

|

Design

Value

Valid

Ind.

|

|

|

Design

Value

Valid

Ind.

24-Hour Annual 2011 2010 2009

42-017-0012

42-029-0100

ROCKVIEW LANE

NEW GARDEN AIRPORT - TOUGHKENAMON

364

293

4

3

 29.7

 33.8*

 11.5

 13.3*

N

N

354

341

4

4

 28.3

 35.1

 10.5

 13.8

N

N

319

332

4

4

 25.8

 31.1

 10.8

 14.1

N

N

 28

 33

Y

N

 10.9

 13.7

Y

N

Appendix A-1
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

PRELIMINARY DESIGN VALUE REPORT

Report Date: Jul. 10, 2012

Notes: 1. Computed design values are a snapshot of the data at the time the report was run (may not be all data for year). 

 2. Some PM2.5 24-hour DVs for incomplete data that are marked invalid here may be marked valid in the Official report due to additional analysis.

 3. Annual Values not meeting completeness criteria are marked with an asterisk ('*').

Page 10 of 10

Pollutant:

Standard Units:

NAAQS Standard:

Statistic:

Statistic:

Site-LevelPM2.5 - Local Conditions(88101)

Micrograms/cubic meter (LC)(105)

PM25 24-hour 2006 / PM25 Annual 2006

Annual Weighted Mean

Annual 98th Percentile

Level:

Level:

Design Value Year: 2012

REPORT EXCLUDES MEASUREMENTS WITH REGIONALLY CONCURRED EVENT FLAGS.

15

35 State Name: Pennsylvania

Site_ID /

STREET ADDRESS

|

|

|

Cred.

Days

Comp.

Qrtrs

Wtd.

Mean 

98th

Perctil Cert.

|

|

|

Cred.

Days

Comp.

Qrtrs

98th

Perctil

Wtd.

Mean Cert.

|

|

|

Cred.

Days

Comp.

Qrtrs

98th

Perctil

Wtd.

Mean Cert.

|

|

|

Design

Value

Valid

Ind.

|

|

|

Design

Value

Valid

Ind.

24-Hour Annual 2012 2011 2010

42-017-0012

42-029-0100

ROCKVIEW LANE

NEW GARDEN AIRPORT - TOUGHKENAMON

118

112

1

1

 34.9

 21.0

*

*

 10.2

 8.8

*

*

N

N

364

293

4

3

 29.7

 33.8*

 11.5

 13.3 *

N

N

354

341

4

4

 28.3

 35.1

 10.5

 13.8

N

N

 31

 30

N

N

 10.7

 12.0

N

N

Appendix A-1
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

DESIGN VALUE REPORT

Report Request ID: 1004163 Report Code: AMP480 Jul. 10, 2012

Selection Criteria Page 1

User ID: HXN

State County Site Parameter POC City AQCR UAR CBSA CSA

EPA

Region Method Duration Begin Date End Date

42

42

42

42

42

42

42

42

045

091

101

101

101

101

101

101

0002

0013

0004

0024

0047

0055

0057

1002

88101

88101

88101

88101

88101

88101

88101

88101

GEOGRAPHIC SELECTIONS

SELECTED OPTIONS

USER SITE METADATA

MERGE PDF FILES

QUARTERLY DATA IN WORKFILE

WORKFILE DELIMITER

SINGLE EVENT PROCESSING

Option Type Option Value

STREET ADDRESS

YES

NO

,

EXCLUDE REGIONALLY CONCURRED EVENTS

GLOBAL DATES

2010

Start Date End Date

2012

Tribal

Code

APPLICABLE STANDARDS

Standard Description

PM25 24-hour 2006

PM25 Annual 2006

Appendix A-2
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

PRELIMINARY DESIGN VALUE REPORT

Report Date: Jul. 10, 2012

Notes: 1. Computed design values are a snapshot of the data at the time the report was run (may not be all data for year). 

 2. Some PM2.5 24-hour DVs for incomplete data that are marked invalid here may be marked valid in the Official report due to additional analysis.

 3. Annual Values not meeting completeness criteria are marked with an asterisk ('*').

Page 1 of 4

Appendix A-2
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

PRELIMINARY DESIGN VALUE REPORT

Report Date: Jul. 10, 2012

Notes: 1. Computed design values are a snapshot of the data at the time the report was run (may not be all data for year). 

 2. Some PM2.5 24-hour DVs for incomplete data that are marked invalid here may be marked valid in the Official report due to additional analysis.

 3. Annual Values not meeting completeness criteria are marked with an asterisk ('*').

Page 2 of 4

Pollutant:

Standard Units:

NAAQS Standard:

Statistic:

Statistic:

Site-LevelPM2.5 - Local Conditions(88101)

Micrograms/cubic meter (LC)(105)

PM25 24-hour 2006 / PM25 Annual 2006

Annual Weighted Mean

Annual 98th Percentile

Level:

Level:

Design Value Year: 2010

REPORT EXCLUDES MEASUREMENTS WITH REGIONALLY CONCURRED EVENT FLAGS.

15

35 State Name: Pennsylvania

Site_ID /

STREET ADDRESS

|

|

|

Cred.

Days

Comp.

Qrtrs

Wtd.

Mean 

98th

Perctil Cert.

|

|

|

Cred.

Days

Comp.

Qrtrs

98th

Perctil

Wtd.

Mean Cert.

|

|

|

Cred.

Days

Comp.

Qrtrs

98th

Perctil

Wtd.

Mean Cert.

|

|

|

Design

Value

Valid

Ind.

|

|

|

Design

Value

Valid

Ind.

24-Hour Annual 2010 2009 2008

42-045-0002

42-091-0013

42-101-0004

42-101-0024

42-101-0047

42-101-0055

42-101-0057

FRONT ST & NORRIS ST

STATE ARMORY - 1046 BELVOIR RD

1501 E LYCOMING AVE AMS LAB

GRANT-ASHTON ROADS PHILA NE AIRPORT

500 SOUTH BROAD STREET - PARKING LOT(CHS

24TH & RITNER STREETS

240 Spring Garden Street

349

330

330

352

357

336

323

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

 32.8

 25.9

 27.6

 25.2

 27.6

 28.9

 27.9

 13.5

 9.5

 10.7

 9.6

 11.0

 11.3

 10.9

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

347

330

346

359

363

351

338

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

 27.9

 27.2

 25.9

 25.5

 27.2

 28.6

 28.3

 12.4

 10.4

 10.8

 9.9

 11.1

 11.3

 11.1

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

112

109

356

356

366

331

366

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

 28.6

 23.7

 34.5

 30.5

 32.8

 34.5

 32.8

 13.9

 11.7

 13.0

 12.0

 13.5

 13.5

 13.3

Y

Y

N

N

N

N

N

 30

 26

 29

 27

 29

 31

 30

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

 13.3

 10.5

 11.5

 10.5

 11.9

 12.0

 11.7

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Appendix A-2
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

PRELIMINARY DESIGN VALUE REPORT

Report Date: Jul. 10, 2012

Notes: 1. Computed design values are a snapshot of the data at the time the report was run (may not be all data for year). 

 2. Some PM2.5 24-hour DVs for incomplete data that are marked invalid here may be marked valid in the Official report due to additional analysis.

 3. Annual Values not meeting completeness criteria are marked with an asterisk ('*').

Page 3 of 4

Pollutant:

Standard Units:

NAAQS Standard:

Statistic:

Statistic:

Site-LevelPM2.5 - Local Conditions(88101)

Micrograms/cubic meter (LC)(105)

PM25 24-hour 2006 / PM25 Annual 2006

Annual Weighted Mean

Annual 98th Percentile

Level:

Level:

Design Value Year: 2011

REPORT EXCLUDES MEASUREMENTS WITH REGIONALLY CONCURRED EVENT FLAGS.

15

35 State Name: Pennsylvania

Site_ID /

STREET ADDRESS

|

|

|

Cred.

Days

Comp.

Qrtrs

Wtd.

Mean 

98th

Perctil Cert.

|

|

|

Cred.

Days

Comp.

Qrtrs

98th

Perctil

Wtd.

Mean Cert.

|

|

|

Cred.

Days

Comp.

Qrtrs

98th

Perctil

Wtd.

Mean Cert.

|

|

|

Design

Value

Valid

Ind.

|

|

|

Design

Value

Valid

Ind.

24-Hour Annual 2011 2010 2009

42-045-0002

42-091-0013

42-101-0004

42-101-0024

42-101-0047

42-101-0055

42-101-0057

42-101-1002

FRONT ST & NORRIS ST

STATE ARMORY - 1046 BELVOIR RD

1501 E LYCOMING AVE AMS LAB

GRANT-ASHTON ROADS PHILA NE AIRPORT

500 SOUTH BROAD STREET - PARKING LOT(CHS

24TH & RITNER STREETS

240 Spring Garden Street

5200 PENNYPACK PARK PHILADELPHIA, PA. 19136

341

365

348

357

335

345

121

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

 28.6

 27.6

 29.6

 27.5

 30.6

 30.5

 27.5

 12.9

 10.3

 13.1

 11.4

 11.4

 11.4

 9.0

*

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

349

330

330

352

357

336

323

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

 32.8

 25.9

 27.6

 25.2

 27.6

 28.9

 27.9

 13.5

 9.5

 10.7

 9.6

 11.0

 11.3

 10.9

*

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

347

330

346

359

363

351

338

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

 27.9

 27.2

 25.9

 25.5

 27.2

 28.6

 28.3

 12.4

 10.4

 10.8

 9.9

 11.1

 11.3

 11.1

*

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

 30

 27

 28

 25

 27

 29

 29

 28

Y

Y

Y

N

Y

Y

Y

N

 12.9

 10.1

 11.5

 9.8

 11.2

 11.4

 11.1

 9.0

Y

Y

Y

N

Y

Y

Y

N

Appendix A-2
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

PRELIMINARY DESIGN VALUE REPORT

Report Date: Jul. 10, 2012

Notes: 1. Computed design values are a snapshot of the data at the time the report was run (may not be all data for year). 

 2. Some PM2.5 24-hour DVs for incomplete data that are marked invalid here may be marked valid in the Official report due to additional analysis.

 3. Annual Values not meeting completeness criteria are marked with an asterisk ('*').

Page 4 of 4

Pollutant:

Standard Units:

NAAQS Standard:

Statistic:

Statistic:

Site-LevelPM2.5 - Local Conditions(88101)

Micrograms/cubic meter (LC)(105)

PM25 24-hour 2006 / PM25 Annual 2006

Annual Weighted Mean

Annual 98th Percentile

Level:

Level:

Design Value Year: 2012

REPORT EXCLUDES MEASUREMENTS WITH REGIONALLY CONCURRED EVENT FLAGS.

15

35 State Name: Pennsylvania

Site_ID /

STREET ADDRESS

|

|

|

Cred.

Days

Comp.

Qrtrs

Wtd.

Mean 

98th

Perctil Cert.

|

|

|

Cred.

Days

Comp.

Qrtrs

98th

Perctil

Wtd.

Mean Cert.

|

|

|

Cred.

Days

Comp.

Qrtrs

98th

Perctil

Wtd.

Mean Cert.

|

|

|

Design

Value

Valid

Ind.

|

|

|

Design

Value

Valid

Ind.

24-Hour Annual 2012 2011 2010

42-045-0002

42-091-0013

42-101-0004

42-101-0024

42-101-0047

42-101-0055

42-101-0057

42-101-1002

FRONT ST & NORRIS ST

STATE ARMORY - 1046 BELVOIR RD

1501 E LYCOMING AVE AMS LAB

GRANT-ASHTON ROADS PHILA NE AIRPORT

500 SOUTH BROAD STREET - PARKING LOT(CHS

24TH & RITNER STREETS

240 Spring Garden Street

5200 PENNYPACK PARK PHILADELPHIA, PA. 19136

118

113

91

89

88

90

27

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

 23.9

 21.1

 27.9

 20.0

 19.6

 20.6

 23.4

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

 10.1

 8.0

 14.6

 9.9

 9.8

 10.0

 13.4

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

341

365

348

357

335

345

121

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

 28.6

 27.6

 29.6

 27.5

 30.6

 30.5

 27.5

 12.9

 10.3

 13.1

 11.4

 11.4

 11.4

 9.0

*

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

349

330

330

352

357

336

323

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

 32.8

 25.9

 27.6

 25.2

 27.6

 28.9

 27.9

 13.5

 9.5

 10.7

 9.6

 11.0

 11.3

 10.9

*

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

 28

 25

 28

 25

 25

 26

 26

 25

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

 12.2

 9.3

 12.8

 9.6

 10.8

 10.9

 10.7

 11.2

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

Appendix A-2
1

Appendix B-1

Statistical Results for Computation of 2008-2010 Diagnostic 24-hour PM2.5 Design Values of Monitoring Sites 42-029-0100 and 

34-007-0003 in the Philadelphia-Wilmington Nonattainment Area

Figure 1. Philadelphia 24-hour Design Value History
2

Figure 2. Philadelphia Sites: 2008-2010 24-hour Design Values, R2, & Data Capture Compared to Site A1
3

Figure 3: Linear Regression Results for Site A1
4

Figure 4: Imputation and Resulting Data Capture and 24-hour Design Value Recalculation for Site A1
5

Figure 5: Bootstrapping Residuals (and 24-hour Design Value Recalculations) for Site A1
6

Figure 6: Philadelphia Sites: 2008-2010 24-hour Design Values, R2, & Data Capture Compared to Site A2
7

Figure 7: Linear Regression Results for Site A2
8

Figure 8: Imputation and Resulting Data Capture and DV Recalculation for Site A2
9

Figure 9: Bootstrapping Residuals (and 24-hour Design Value Recalculations) for Site A2
1

Appendix B-2

Statistical Results for Computation of 2009-2011 Diagnostic 24-hour PM2.5 Design Values of Monitoring Site 42-029-0100 in 

the Philadelphia-Wilmington Nonattainment Area

Figure 10. Philadelphia 24-hour Design Value History
2

Figure 11. Philadelphia Sites: 2009-2011 24-hour Design Values, R2, & Data Capture Compared to Site A3
3

Figure 12: Linear Regression Results for Site A3
4

Figure 13: Imputation and Resulting Data Capture and 24-hour Design Value Recalculation for Site A3
5

Figure 14: Bootstrapping Residuals (and 24-hour Design Value Recalculations) for Site A3
The Honorable Michael L. Krancer, Secretary

Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection

Rachel Carson State Office BuildingP.O. Box 2063

Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17105-2063

Dear Secretary Krancer:

By letter and enclosures dated August 4, 2011, the Pennsylvania Department of

Environmental Protection (PADEP) submitted tO the U.S. Environmental Protection

Agency (EPA) an annual ambient air monitoring network plan in accordance with the regulatoryrequirements of 40 CFR Section 58 -Ambient Air Quality Surveillance. Based on our review,

EPA hereby approves PADEP’s August 4, 2011 annual ambient air monitoring network plan on

the basis that the plan meets the requirements of 40 CFR Part 58.10.

Additionally, 40 CFR Section 58.11(c) requires any changes to the air monitoring

network or design ofthe following air monitoring systems be approved by the EPAAdministrator:

a) Photochemical Assessment Monitoring Systems (PAMS)

b) Particulate Matter Speciation Trends Network (STN)c) The National Core Monitoring Network (NCore)

EPA determined that PADEP’s August 4, 2011 annual ambient air monitoring network plan does

not require approval from the EPA Administrator because there were no changes to any ofthe airmonitoring systems listed above.

Printed on 100% recycled/recyclablepaper with 100% post-consumerfiber andprocess chlorinefree.

Customer Service Hotline: 1-800-438-2474

0

1
Shawn M. Garvin

Regional Administrétor

cc: Ms. Joyce Epps, PADEP

Mr. Nick Lazor, PADEP

2
The Honorable Collin P. O’Mara, Secretary

Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control

89 Kings Highway

Dover, Delaware 19901

Dear Secretary O’Mara:

By letter and enclosures dated July 12, 2011, the Delaware Department of Natural

Resources and Environmental Control (DNREC) submitted to the U. S. EnvironmentalProtection Agency (EPA) an annual ambient air monitoring network plan in accordance with the

regulatory requirements of 40 CFR Part 58 -Ambient Air Quality Surveillance. Based on ourreview, EPA hereby approves DNREC’s July 12, 2011 annual ambient air monitoring network

plan on the basis that the plan meets the requirements of 40 CFR Part 58.10.

Additionally, 40 CFR Section 58.11(c) requires any changes to the air monitoring

network or design ofthe following air monitoring systems be approved by the EPAAdministrator:

a) Photochemical Assessment Monitoring Systems (PAMS)

b) Particulate Matter Speciation Trends Network (SIN)c) The National Core Monitoring Network (NCore)

EPA determined that DNREC’s July 12, 2011 annual ambient air monitoring network plan does

nOt require approval from the EPA Administrator because there were no changes to any ofthe airmonitoring systems listed above.

Printed on 100% recycled/recyclablepaper with 100% post-consumerfiber andprocess chlorinefree.

Customer Service Hatilne: 1-800-438-2474

1
Shawn M. Garvin 7

Regional AdministrIor

cc: Mr. Au Mirzakhalili, DNREC

Mr. Joseph Martini, DNRECMs. Betsy Frey, DNREC

2
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

REGION 2 

290 BROADWAY 

NEW YORK, NY 10007-1868 

OCT 2 7 2011 

Jane Kozinski 

Assistant Commissioner, Environmental Management 

State of New Jersey Department of Environment Protection 

PO Box 420 

Mail Code 401-0JB 

401 East State Street - 3rd floor 

Trenton. NJ 08625-0420 

Dear Ms. Kozinski; 

This is in response to the Annual Monitoring Network Review Plan (Plan) for New Jersey 

State's ambient air monitoring program which was submitted to the United States Environmental 

Protection Agency (EPA) on August 8, 2011. This is to inform you that EPA Region 2 has 

reviewed New Jersey's Plan for consistency with 40 CFR Part 58.10 and is approving that 

portion of the Plan related to the final network design. 

The portion of the Plan involving the National Core multi-pollutant monitoring station (NCore), 

PM2 5 Speciation Trends Network stations, and Photochemical Assessment Monitoring Stations 

(PAMS) nehvork design and changes are subject to approval by the EPA Administrator. 

Accordingly, we will forward that portion of New Jersey's Plan to EPA's Office of Air Quality 

Planning and Standards for review. My staff will be working closely with our Headquarters 

counterparts and keep your staff informed of the progress of the review of that portion of the 

Plan. 

New Jersey proposes to close 3 monitoring sites (Freehold, Morristown, and Perth Amboy) and 

shutdown 5 parameters ( 4 CO and I PM10 which was approved for shutdown in 20 l 0). EPA has 

evaluated and accepts these proposed closures. With respect to the site/parameter closures for 

CO in locations where there is a CO maintenance plan, we look forward to receiving New 

Jersey's request to revise the State Implementation Plan (SIP) associated with the CO closures, 

as discussed further in the attached docwnent. 

We look forward to working with you to establish the N02 near roadway monitors. We are also 

excited to hear that the new TSP-lead monitors and the Camden and Fort Lee sites should be 

fully operational by the end of 2011. Please let us know if there is any assistance we can provide 

to establish these sites. 

Internet Addreu (URL) • h!lpJ/www.epa.gov 

~IM'Rtq'CiaDiol• Pl1ntld wtlh v.-.. Olla...d lnU on ~ ~~M~ SO%~ eonwJt) 

Appendix C-3 1
If you have any questions. please have your staff contact Mr. Richard Ruvo at 212·637·40 14 or 

Ms. Mazeeda Khan at 212-637-3715. 

Sincerely,, 

/"'/~ / r 

~ 

~ {. 

John Fihppelh. Acting Direct -

Division of Environmental Planning and Protection 

cc: William O'Sullivan, NJDEP 

Charles Pietarinen, NJDEP 

Attachment 

Appendix C-3 2
ATTACHMENT 

SECTION 1: CHANGES THAT AFFECT CO MAINTENANCE PLANS 

The New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection lNJDEP) had previously requested a 

shutdown of the Freehold, Morristown, and Perth Amboy CO monitoring sites. EPA has been 

discussing the proposed CO monitor shutdowns with NJDEP and the ability to shut down 

monitors in maintenance areas. EPA and NJDEP have been working on the appropriate analysis 

for the past few months in order to satisfy the provisions of the CO maintenance plans. NJDEP 

will submit the analysis to EPA as part of a request to revise the SIP. 

AN CORA STATE HOSPITAL AOS lD 340071001 

~JDEP recommendation- shutdown CO parameter. 

Background- Ancora State Hospital, Camden County, is in the Philadelphia-CamdenWilmington CBSA. The site operates CO, 0 3, S02, and acid deposition parameters. The 

regulatory standard for 8 hour CO is 9 ppm. At Ancora State Hospital, for 2008, 2009, and 

2010, the CO first maximwn 8 hour data are 4.4 ppm. 0.4 ppm, and 0.4 ppm, respectively. Once 

the new Camden site is established, it will represent CO for the area. 

EPA response- EPA concurs. Sampling for CO at the new Camden monitoring site will be 

representative for air quality in the area. 

FREEHOLD AQS lD 340252001 

NJDEP recommendation- site closure. 

Background- Freehold, Morunouth County is in the New York·New Jersey·Connecticut CBSA. 

This site operates CO. The regulatory standard for 8 hour CO is 9 ppm. At Freehold, for 2008, 

2009, and 2010. the CO tirst maximum 8 hour data are 2.0 ppm. 2.4 ppm, and 2.1 ppm, 

respectively. The Elizabeth site, the closest site to Freehold, is 28 miles away. At Elizabeth, for 

2008.2009, and 2010. the CO first maximum 8 hour data are 2.4 ppm. 2.2 ppm. and 2.2 ppm. 

respectively. 

EPA response- EPA concurs. With respect to CO, this site operated consistent with an EPA 

approved CO maintenance plan. Since NJDEP wishes to shutdown the site to redirect resources 

to new regulatory requirements, NJDEP needs to provide additional analysis to EPA to address 

the CO maintenance plan. EPA will make a determination on NJDEP's analysis as a revision to 

the SIP. 

:110RRISTOWN AQS ID 340270003 

Appendix C-3 3
NJDEP recommendation- site closure. 

Background- Morristown, Morris County, is in the New York· New Jersey·Connecticut CBSA. 

This site operates CO. The regulatory standard for 8 hour CO is 9 ppm. At Morristo~n. for 

2008, 2009, and 201 0. the CO first maximwn 8 hour data are 1.5 ppm. 1.0 ppm. and 1.1 ppm. 

respectively. The Elizabeth site. the closest site to Morristo\\on, is 17 miles away. At Elizabeth. 

for 2008,2009. and 2010, the CO first maximum 8 hour data are 2.4 ppm. 2.2 ppm, and 2.2 ppm, 

respectively. 

EPA response- EPA concun. With respect to CO. this site operated consistent with an EPA 

approved CO maintenance plan. Since NJDEP wishes to shutdovm the site to redirect resources 

to new regulatory requirements. NJDEP needs to provide additional analysis to EPA to address 

the CO maintenance plan. EPA will make a determination on NJDEP's analysis as a revision to 

the SIP. 

PERTH AMBOY AQS ID 340232003 

NJDEP recommendation- site closure. 

Background- Perth Amboy. Middlesex County. is in the New York· New Jersey·Connecticut 

CBSA. The site operates CO. The regulatory standard for 8 hour CO is 9 ppm. At Perth 

Amboy. for 2008, 2009. and 2010, the CO first maximum 8 hour data are 1.2 ppm. 1.6 ppm, and 

1.5 ppm, respectively. The Elizabeth site is II miles away and generally has higher values than 

that in Perth Amboy. At Elizabeth. for 2008,2009, and 2010, the CO first maximum 8 hour data 

are 2.4 ppm. 2.2 ppm. and 2.2 ppm, respectively. 

EPA response -EPA concurs. With respect to CO, this site operated consistent with an EPA 

approved CO maintenance plan. Since NJDEP wishes to shutdovm the site to redirect resources 

to new regulatory requirements, NJDEP needs to provide additional analysis to EPA to address 

the CO maintenance plan. EPA will make a determination on NJDEP's analysis as a revision to 

the SIP. 

SECTION 2: MONITORING SITE CHANGES 

TRENTON AQS ID 340210008 

NJDEP recommendation- PM10 shutdo\\n. 

Background- Trenton, Mercer County, is in the Trenton CBSA. The site has a P~h 5 filter based 

sampler and a PM1o filter based sampler. The regulatory standard for PM1o arithmetic mean is 

50 ug/m3

. At Trenton, the PM10 arithmetic mean data for 2008, 2009 and 2010 are 24.4 ug/m3

• 

16.6 ug/m3

• and 20.6 ug/m3, respectively. The arithmetic mean data at the Camden RRF site. the 

closest PM1o filter based sampler, in 2008, 2009. and 2010, are 26.8 ug/m3

• 36.7 ug!m3• and 30.1 

ug/m3

• respectively In addition, the new Camden site will also be representative of the area. 

Appendix C-3 4
EPA response- EPA concurs. This parameter shutdown was previously approved in last 

year's 2010 annual plan. EPA agrees with shutting down the parameter because PM:: 5 is the 

pollutant of concern in the CBSA for particles. The data at Trenton is Jess than SO% of the 

current regulatory standard. The area will be represented by the PM10 filter based sampler at the 

Camden RRF and the new Camden sites. 

FORT LEE AQS ID 340030004 

NJDEP recommendation- CO, PM2 s, PM10 startup. 

Background- Fort Lee, Bergen County, is in the New York-New Jersey-Connecticut CBSA. 

This site operates CO. PM10 tilter based sampler, and PM2 5 continuous sampler. In November 

::!009. the site was shutdo'Nll because of major utility repairs. 

EPA response- EPA concurs with reestablishing this site. 

RIDER UNIVERSITY AQS 1D 340210005 

NJDEP recommendation- S02 startup. 

Background- Rider University, Mercer County, is in the Trenton CBSA. The site has NO, N02, 

NOy, 0 3, 03 precursors, and meteorological parameters. 

EPA response- EPA concurs with the S02 startup at this site. 

NEW ARK FIREHOUSE AQS ID 340130003 

NJDEP recommendation- NOz, NO\., PMcoarse, TSP-lead, and meteorological parameters startup. 

Background- Newark Firehouse, Essex County, is in the New York-New Jersey-Connecticut 

CBSA. The site currently operates CO, 03, SOz, PM2 s filter based sampler, PM2 s tilter based 

speciation, and PM:: 5 continuous sampler. 

EPA response- EPA concurs with additional parameters. This site will be NJDEP's NCore 

site. EPA looks fonvard to the continued improvements to the site to achieve that status. 

COLUMBIA LAKE WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT AREA {WMA) AQS ID 340410007 

NJDEP recommendation- new site with PM:: 5 tilter based and continuous, 0 3• NO::, and S02 

parameters. 

Appendix C-3 5
Background -Columbia, Warren County, is in the Allentown-Bethlehem-Easton CBSA. This 

site will measure impact of major point sources located in Pennsylvania side of the Delaware 

River. 

EPA response- EPA concurs with the additional parameters being added to the site. 

CAMDEN AQS ID 340070011 

NJDEP recommendation- CO. N02. 03, S02, PM2 s filter based and continuous, PM2 5 

speciation. PM 10• PAMS, VOC, carbonyls, and meteorological parameters startup. 

Background- Camden, Camden County, is in the Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington CBSA. 

The old Camden site was discontinued because of repeated acts of vandalism and theft. 

Accordingly, the site was closed and NJDEP. in conjunction with EPA Region 2. surveyed 

various locations for a secure, appropriate site. Possible locations included PSE&G, the Brimms 

School and Sacred Heart Church. The Brimms School is near the old Camden site and within the 

community; however, there will be similar security issues. As for Sacred Heart. there is no 

additional room to locate a new trailer with a comprehensive monitoring site. PSE&G was 

selected in consultation between New Jersey. EPA Region 2. as well as the local Environmental 

Justice Council in Camden. The new Camden site will have trace CO, N02, and S02, 0 3• Smoke 

Shade, PM2 s filter based, PM2 5 speciation, real time PM2.5, PM10 filter based, 0 3 precursors 

(PAMS parameters), VOCs. Carbonyls, Barometric pressure. Relative Humidity, Solar 

Radiation. Temperature, Wind Direction, and Wind Speed. 

EPA response- EPA concurs. Establishing a new site at the PSE&G offers security and 

adequate space. The site meets siting criteria. Accordingly, EPA concurs with the establishment 

of the site. In general. the new site will monitor for all parameters sampled at previous site 

including taxies. carbonyls, speciation. and other criteria pollutants. New Jersey is installing a 

more secure trailer at the site. 

Appendix C-3 6
~tnte of em J:h~rs£fJ

CI mls CIIRIST1[ 

1\1\1 Cli .. \DMiNO 

1.1. (;'}\'c'l'Jwr 

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONy!ENTAL PROTECflON 

OFFICE OF TIlE CO'\!y!lSSlONER 

P.O. Box ~01

TRENT01':, NJ OX615·0~01

Il013 ,\I,\RTIN 

Cu 111111 issiul/t'1' 

October 5, 20 II 

Honorable Judith A. Enck 

Regional Administrator 

US EPA, Region 2 

290 Broadway, 26th Floor 

New York, NY 10007- 1866 

Dear Regional Administrator Enck: 

'The State of New Jersey requests the United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) 

determine the air quality in New Jersey and its multi-state nonattainmenl areas is meeting the 

fine particle matter (PM::'.)) National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). This 

determination is referred to as a "clean data determination." 

This req uest is tor clean data detenninations for: 

I.	 The daily standard for the Northern New Jersey-New York-Long Island (NNJ-NY-CT) 

nonattainmellt area. All monitors in New Jersey and the other states in this multi-state 

nonattainment area have shown compliance with the daily standard for the 2007-2009 

monitoring period. 

')	 The annual fine particle stanclard for the Southern New Jersey-Philadelphia-Wilmington 

(SNJ-PA-DE) non attainment area. All monitors in New Jersey and the other states in this 

multi-state nonnttaimnent area have shown compliance with the annual standard Ic)r thc 

2007-200lJ monitoring period. 

3.	 The daily tine particle standard t()r the Southern New Jersey-Philadelphia-Wilmington 

nonattainment area. All monitors in New Jersey and the other states in this multi-state 

nonattailll11ent area have shown compliance with the daily standard for the 2008-20 I0 

monitoring period. 

The USEP;\ had previously detclmined that the NNJ-NY-CT PM2.5 nonattainment area had 

attained the 1997 annual PM2,5 NAAQS for the 2007-2009 monitoring period. The USEPA 

issued a clean data determination Ic)r the area on Nc)\cmber 15,2010 (75 FR 69589). The state 

of New Jersey is requesting that the USEPA pcrtc))"JTI an analysis fi:Jf the 24-hour tine particulate 

Appendix D 1
matter NAAQS f()r the NNJ-NY-CT nonattainment area and the 1997 annual and 24-hour line 

particle NAAQS for the SNJ-PA~DE nonattainmcnt area. The State believes that the US EPA 

can pertonn the same analysis as done for the tomler NNJ-NY-CT annual PM}.5 nonattainmenl 

area and find that the NNJ-NY-CT and SNJ-PA-DE nonattainmcnt areas are meeting the tine 

particle NAAQS. 

lnfomlation needed for the USEPA to make the c1can data detclmination (40 CPR 51.918) is 

summarized in the attachments to this letter. 

The State Implementation Plan contains a wide range of real, quanti fiable, enforceable and 

permanent, federal and stute control measures to reduce PM25, oxides of nitrogen and sulfur 

dioxide emissions. A summary of these measures is included in Attachment 5. 

We appreciate the assistance your staff provided New Jersey in preparing this request and their 

continued efforts to assist us in achieving clean air in New Jersey and the region. Achieving the 

annual and daily PM25 health standards is a significant accomplishment f()r our nir quality tenms. 

If you or your staff has any questions, please contact Ms. Sharon Davis, Air Quality Planning 

Section Chief: at (609) 292-6722. 

Attachments 

c:	 Jane Kozinski, Assistant Commissioner, NJDEP 

Ray Wcmer, USEPA 

Rick Ruvo, USEPA 

Ken Fradkin, USEPA 

Appendix D 2
Attachment 1 

Clean Data Determination Request Summary 

Northern New Jersey-New York-Long Island CNNJ-NY-CT) Nonattainment Area 

•	 New Jersey's fine particle matter (PM2.5) air quality data in the Air Quality System 

measured through 2010 is complete, quality-assured, certified ambient air quality 

monitoring data. See summary in Attachment 2. 

•	 The data shows that the highest design value in the NNJ-NY-CT nonattainrnent area for 

the three year period 2007-2009, 35 Jlg/m3 measured at PS 59 in New York, meets the 

24-hr PM2.5National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) of35 Jlg/m3

• The highest 

design value for the New Jersey portion ofthe nonattainrnent area is 33 Jlg/m3 measured 

at Union City. 

•	 The 24-hour PM2,5concentrations in New Jersey have shown a significant overall
 

decreasing trend over time as shown in the chart in Attachment 4.
 

Southern New Jersey-Philadelphia-Wilmington (SNJ-PA-DE) Nonattainment Area 

•	 Some data was incomplete for some monitors in the SNJ-PA-DE nonattainrnent area. 

The USEPA concluded that substitution could be used for monitoring sites with 

incomplete data. The USEPA's analysis ofthe SNJ-PA-DE nonattainrnent area's PM2.5 

air quality data was provided to the states by the USEPA in an email dated June 9, 2011. 

See summary in Attachment 3. 

•	 The data shows that the highest design value for the annual standard in the SNJ-PA-DE 

nonattainrnent area for the three year period 2007-2009, 13.9 Jlg/m3 measured at Chester, 

Pennsylvania meets the effective annual PM2.5 NAAQS of 15 Jlg/m3

• The highest design 

value for the New Jersey portion ofthe nonattainrnent area is 11.7 Jlg/m3 measured at 

Camden. 

•	 The data shows that the highest design value for the 24-hour standard in the SNJ-PA-DE 

nonattainrnent area for the three year period 2008-2010, 33 Jlg/m3 measured at Chester, 

Pennsylvania, meets the effective 24-hr PM2.5 NAAQS of35 Jlg/m3

. The highest design 

value for the New Jersey portion ofthe nonattainrnent area is 25 Jlg/m3 measured at 

Camden. 

•	 The annual and 24-hour PM2.5 concentrations in New Jersey have shown a significant 

overall decreasing trend over time as shown in the chart in Attachment 4. 

Appendix D 3
Control Measures 

•	 The New Jersey 1997 Annual PM2.5 Attainment Demonstration State Implementation 

Plan (SIP) was submitted to the USEPA on March 26, 2009. The New Jersey Regional 

Haze SIP was submitted to the USEPA on July 28,2009. The SIPs document a wide 

range ofreal, quantifiable, enforceable and pennanent, federal and state control measures 

adopted and/or implemented to reduce past and future PM2•S, oxides ofnitrogen and sulfur 

dioxide emissions. A summary of these measures is included in Attachment 5. 

Appendix D 4
Attachment 2 

Clean Data Determination Request - 2006 24-Hour PM2•5 NAAQS
 

Northern New Jersey-New York-Long Island (NNJ-NY-CT) Nonattainment Area
 

Air Quality Monitoring Data 

On November 13, 2009, the USEPA promulgated designations for the 2006 24-hour 

PM2.5 National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) (74 FR 58688) of35 Ilglm3. Under the 

24-hour NAAQS designations, New Jersey was included in two multi-state non-attainment areas. 

Air quality monitors in the New Jersey portion ofthe NNJ-NY-CT nonattainment area now 

monitor attainment ofthe 2006 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS. Furthermore, the Connecticut and New 

York State portions ofthe NNJ-NY-CT nonattainment area monitor attainment ofthe 2006 24­

hour PM2.5 NAAQS as well. 

The following table contains complete, quality assured 2007-2009 and 2008-201024­

hour PM2.

5 design values that have been certified by the New Jersey Department of 

Environmental Protection, the Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection, and the 

New York State Department of Environmental Conservation as accurate. 

Appendix D 5
24-hour PM2.5 Monitoring Summary 

2009 and 2010 Certified Design Values 

Northern New Jersey-New York-Connecticut Nonattalnment Area 

Last Updated 9/20/11 

Dally PM2.5 

Monitored Values 

24-Hour9St!I 

Percentile 

Dally 

PM2.5 

DV" 

Dally 

PM2.5 

DV" 

Notes 

State County Monitor Site AQS Monitor 

10 2007 200S 2009 2010 2007-9 2008-10 Year 

lua/m3

lua/m3 lun/m3 un/m3 ua/m3 ua/m3 Units 

35 35 35 35 35 35 NAAQS 

NJ Beroen Fort Lee 34 003 0003 35 32 27 25 31 28 

Shutdown 

Essex Newark Cultural Center 35 29 SO NA NA­ NA­ 7/24/2008, New 

Newark site up 

340130015 6/30/2009 

Essex Newark Firehouse 340130003 NA NA NA 24 NA­ NA- New Newark site 

up 6/30/2009 

Hudson Jersey City Primary 340171003 35 32 29 26 32 29 

Hudson Union City 340172002 39 33 27 27 33 29 

Mercer Trenton 340210008 33 31 23 28 29 27 

Mercer Washington Crossing 34 0218001 27 28 22 19 26 23 

Middlesex New Brunswick 34 023 0006 30 29 21 19 27 23 

Morris MorrIstown 340270004 32 24 22 23 26 23 

Morris Chester 340273001 31 24 21 23 26 23 

Passaic Paterson 34 0310005 37 29 26 24 30 26 

Union Elizabeth Turnpike 

Primary 34 039 0004 35 34 28 28 32 30 

Union Elizabeth Downtown 34 039 0006 36 31 26 25 31 27 

Union Rahway 340392003 33 30 25 24 30 26 

NY Bronx Morrlsanla 360050080 36 31 30 27 33 30 

Bronx 200th Street And 

Southern Blvd. 360050133 NA 30 27 25 29 27 

Bronx E. 156th SL 

360050110 

34 30 31 25 32 29 No data gathered 

after 6/16/10. 

Brooklyn JHS 126 360470122 34 29 27 25 30 27 

Nassau Cedarhurst 360590008 29 29 26 20 28 25 

New York PS 59 

360610056 

37 33 NA NA 35 NAShutdown mid· 

2008 (building 

demolished) 

New York JHS45 360610079 34 32 29 25 32 29 

New York PS 19 36061 0128 38 26 29 25 31 27 

New York PS 124 36061 0134 37 32 29 27 33 29 

Queens Newburgh. 55 Broadway 360710002 30 26 21 27 26 24 

Queens Queens College 360810124 32 30 27 26 30 28 

Staten Island Port Richmond 360850055 33 29 25 26 29 26 

Staten Island Susan Wagner HS 360850067 29 28 23 22 27 24 

Suffolk East 

FarmlnadaleiBabylon 36 1030001/2 29 27 22 26 26 24 

Westchester Mamaroneck 361191002 31 30 27 27 29 28 

Appendix D 6
AQS Monitor 

10 

DailyPM2.5 

Monitored Values 

24-Hour 98th 

Percentile 

Dally 

PM2.5 

DV* 

Dally 

PM2.5 

DV* 

Notes 

State County Monitor Site 2007 2008 2009 2010 2007-9 2008·10 Year 

IUQ/mJ lualmJ lualmJ lualmJ ualmJ ua/mJ Units 

35 35 35 35 35 35 NAAQS 

CT Fairfield Roosevelt School 09001 0010 30 32 29 23 31 28 

IFairfield Vl:I VV I"::" 3l 28 28 26 29 2i 

Fairfield Norwalk 090013005 32 26 29 23 29 26 

Fairfield Westport 090019003 29 31 26 24 29 27 

New Haven New Haven Woodward 

Av 090090026 30 31 29 NA 30 NA" Site shutdown 

2010 

New Haven New Haven James St 090090027 31 32 30 26 31 29 

New Haven New Haven State St 090091123 31 32 31 24 31 29 

New Haven New Haven Huntington 

St 090092008 29 25 27 NA 27 NA" Site shutdown 

2010 

New Haven Waterbury 090092123 33 28 28 26 30 27 

Notes 

• =Oeslgn Value=average of three year period.
 

"=Oata not available since 3 years of data are needed to calculate a design value at a monitor.
 

NA = Data Not Available
 

SO = Monitor Shutdown
 

Data sources are either from the State Agency or AirOata (EPA's public query system that accesses AQS)
 

Appendix D 7
PM2.

5 Concentration (pg/rn3

) 

-' N N w o (Jl o o (Jl o w 

CJ1 

Fort Lee, NJ .~.~••••••••••••-l_--r--' 1::: 

Jersey City Primary, NJ •••••••• 

Union City, NJ •••••••• 

Trenton, NJ 

Washington Crossing, NJ 

New Brunswick, NJ ••••••i!I•••~.

Morristown, NJ 

Chester, NJ •••••••••• 

Paterson, NJ ••••••••IIIi•••IIIi. 

Elizabeth Turnpike Primary, NJ II•••••

Elizabeth Downtown, NJ •••••••••••••• 

Rahway,NJ •••••••••••••• 

Morrisania, NY ••••••••e ••••~_

200th Street, NY 

E. 156th St., NY ••••••.-•• :5: 

o JHS 126, NY :;, 

;:;: 

o Cedarhurst, NY .., 

CIl 

;:;: JHS 45, NY lailll.III•••JJiij.JJiij.~ (1) 

•• PS 19, NY \Ul1II.1II~••E.iiI. PS 124, NY .iiiI.IIiI.IIiI.IB~iiI

Newburgh, 55 Broadway, NY lee.e••e~ee•• 

Queens College, NY •••e.D••ee•••~~

Port Richmond, NY 

Susan Wagner HS, NY 

East Farmingdale/Babylon, NY •••••••m•••• 

Mamaroneck, NY •••

Roosevelt School, CT •••••••••••••••• 

Danbury,CT •••••••••••••• 

Norwalk, CT . 

Westport, CT 

James Street, CT ••••••••••••••• 

Stale Street, CT ••••••••••••••• 

Waterbury, CT ". __"'__~._L_~.

<.f2.. 

:3 

w 

0 

[l) 

.;.: 

N 

0 

0 

Z 

0 

;:+ 

:::r 

(1) .., 

:::I 

Z 

(1) 

c... 

(1)

.., s:

-0 (II 

(1) 

'<I 0'1 

Z N (1) 0

...
 ::: 0 

-< 0 Cl .., OJ 

'"

• (") -<

0 0 

:::I (!)

:::I III (1)

-

(') (Q
 

::l
 

(') 

c:

,... <

OJ
 

Z
 c 0 <t> 

::l III tu 

tu
 

:::I
 

3 

(1) 

:;, 

1"+ 

).>

.., 

CD 

OJ 

Appendix D 8
Attachment 3 

Clean Data Determination Request1997 Annual PM2.5 NAAQS and 2006 24-Hour PM2.5 NAAQS
 

Southern New Jersey-Philadelphia-Wilmington (SNJ-PA-DE) Nonattainment Area
 

Air Oualitv Monitoring Data 

The SNJ-PA-DE nonattainment area was designated nonattainment for the 1997 annual 

fine particle matter (PM2.

S) National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) of 15 Ilglm3 on 

December 17,2004 (70 FR 944). Under the annual NAAQS, New Jersey was included in two 

multi-state non-attainment areas. 

On November 13, 2009, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) 

promulgated designations for the 2006 24-hour PM2.S NAAQS (74 FR 58688) of35 J,lglm3

. 

Under the 24-hour NAAQS designations, New Jersey was also included in two multi-state nonattainment areas. Air quality monitors in the New Jersey portion of the SNJ-PA-DE 

nonattainment area now monitor attainment ofthe 1997 Annual PM2.S NAAQS and the 200624­

hour PM2.SNAAQS. Furthermore, the Pennsylvania and Delaware State portions of the 

SNJ-PA-DE nonattainment area monitor attainment ofthe 1997 annual PM2.S NAAQS and the 

2006 24-hour PM2.S NAAQS as well. 

On June 9, 2011, the USEPA provided the states in the SNJ-PA-DE nonattainment area 

with an analysis of the PM2.Smonitoring data for this area. The USEPA concluded that for the 

years 2007-2009 data substitution could be used at monitoring sites with incomplete data for the 

annual standard, but not for the 24-hour standard at the Chester, PA monitoring site. However, 

the USEPA concluded that data substitution could be used for the years 2008-2010 at monitoring 

sites with incomplete data for the 24-hour standard. 

The following table contains 2008-2010 annual and daily PM2.S design values that were provided 

to the New Jersey Department ofEnvironmental Protection by the USEPA. 

Appendix D 9
Annual and 24-hour PM2.5 Monitoring Summary 

2009 and 2010 Certified Design Values 

Southern New Jersey-Philadelphia-Wilmington 

Last Updated 6/9/11 

State County Monitor Site AQS 

Monitor ID 

Annual Mean PM2.5 

Monitored Values Annual PM2.5 DV· Annual PM2.5 

DV* 

Daily PM2.5 

Monitored Values Daily PM2.5 DV* 

Year 2007 2008 2009 2010 2007-2009 2008-2010 2008 2009 2010 2008-10 

Units .ua/m3 ua/m3 ua/m3 ua/m3 un/m3 Notes ua/m3 Notes ua/m3 ua/m3 ua/m3 JJg/m3 Notes 

NAAQS 15 15 15 15 15 15 35 35 35 35 

NJ Camden Pennsauken 340071007 13.8 11.9 9.5 9.5 11.7 C 10.3 C 28.0 25.0 23.4 25.0 C 

Gloucester Gibbstown 340150004 13.3 11.5 9.3 9.1 11.4 Max a Sub. 10.0 C 23.9 21.9 21.6 22.0 C 

New Castle Bellefonte 100031003 13.4 13.0 10.2 10.2 12.2 Max Q Sub. 11.1 

MaxQ 

Sub. 31.6 23.2 24.3 26.0 

MaxQ 

Sub. 

DE New Castle Lums 100031007 12.5 11.5 10.0 10.0 11.3 Max Q Sub. 10.5 

MaxQ 

Sub. 28.1 20.6 27.5 25.0 MaxQ 

Sub. 

New Castle Nwrk-a 100031012 13.4 12.5 10.6 10.4 12.2 C 11.2 C 28.6 23.4 24.9 26.0 C 

New Castle MLK-a 100032004 14.4 13.5 11.2 10.6 13.0 C 11.7 C 34.8 28.4 27.9 30.0 C 

Bucks Bristol 420170012 13.0 12.7 10.8 10.5 12.2 C 11.3 C 30.9 25.8 28.3 28.0 C 

PA Chester New Garden 420290100 14.1 13.7 14.1 13.8 13.9 I 13.8 

MaxQ 

Sub. 32.0 31.1 35.1 33.0 I 

Delaware Chester 420450002 14.7 13.9 12.4 13.5 13.7 C 13.3 C 28.6 27.9 32.8 30.0 C 

Mont~omery Norristown 420910013 13.1 11.7 10.4 9.5 11.7 C 10.5 C 23.7 27.2 25.9 26.0 C 

Philadelphia LAB 421010004 13.7 13.0 10.8 10.7 12.5 C 11.5 C 34.5 25.9 27.6 29.0 C 

Philadelphia 

NEA 

421010024 12.9 12.0 9.9 9.6 11.6 Max a Sub. 10.5 C 30.5 25.5 25.2 27.0 C 

Philadelphia 

CHS, Broad Sf. 

421010047 14.3 13.5 11.1 11.0 13.0 Max Q Sub. 11.9 C 

32.8 27.2 27.6 29.0 

C 

Philadelphia RIT-F 421010055 NO 13.5 11.3 11.3 12.4 C 12.0 C 34.5 28.6 28.9 31.0 C 

Philadelphia FAB-FA 421010057 NO 13.3 11.1 10.9 12.1 C 11.7 G 32.8 28.3 27.9 30.0 G 

Notes: Source: USEPA email dated June 9, 2011 

NO indicates that a monitoring site was not operational 

"Max Q Sub." indicates that data was incomplete, but the annual mean of the "incomplete year" has deemed 

valid because it passed a data substitution test. 

"C" indicates complete data 

Appendix D 10
16 

PM2.5 2010 Annual Design Values 

Southern New Jersey-Philadelphia-Wilmington Nonattainment Area 

T"'--'-'--" 

14 I .~ __•• _ •••. _	 _._-----_..-..----~~_.,.,,--_ .._-_...- .,--",,- ~- _._---- ---'

ME ­

OJ 10 :2. 

C 

o 

"';; 

co 

1:; 8 c 

C1I 

u 

c 

o 

U 

c, 6 N 

2 

0... 

4 

2 

a 

12 .!-~~.-,---._.- ....---_...., -----.---..-. --..--------.-- I 

w w w w ....., ....., «	 « « « « « « « « 

0 0 0 0 z z n.. n.. n.. n..	 n.. CL n.. n.. n..

a) 'f) ro ro c c c ...: C cD lL 

C E 6 .Y Ui Ui -1

« llJ Ql "0 Ql Q)	 « «

;;	 if) u.. L.	 0 ::l -1 ';:: -e	 {1) z v S? ill :; -1	 CD	 \U Ui «l 0:: CD	 .c .2 z 2 rJ) 'C	 « .a <.9 U 2 LL Q c 0 CD CD	 (5 3: (lJ	 C) Z Q.. Z	 r.ri 

I 

U 

Monitor Site 

'i5pgim3 Annual (1997,2006) 

Appendix D 11
PM

2

.

S Concentration (~g/m3)

o 

Bellefonte, DE 

Lums, DE 

Nwrk-a, DE 

MLK-a, DE 

Gibbstown, NJ 

Pennsauken, NJ 

Bristol, PA 

o 

:J S., New Garden, PA 

en 

;:;: 

(1) 

Chesler, PA 

Norristown, PA 

LAB,PA 

NEA,PA 

CHS, Broad St., PA 

RIT-F, PA 

FAB-FA, PA 

...... N N c..v U1 o U1 0 U1 o 

i 

I 

I 

I I! 

t 

;

m 

UJ 

I	 0 

c: 	 c: 

-'

CD.., 

:::l 

J Z 

('l) 

I L.. 

CD.., 

CfJ iJ CD 

'<

S I tv I	 "'tl i.n 

:r N 

0 

to) 

c- o 

-~

CD 0 "0 

:r ~,

l1J '< I 0 

(\) 

I./J

:::l 

-' (Q 

::; ::l 

(Q 

..... QJ<

0 

:::J c:: 

CD Z CfJ 0 

::l 

llJ . ..... 

OJ 

:::l 

:::l 

..) 

CD 

::l 

~.

);.

.., 

CD 

OJ 

Appendix D 12
·Attachment 4 .
 

Monitoring Trend Charts
 

Appendix D 13
PM2.

5 Design Value Concentrations in New Jersey
 

Annual Design Values 1999-2010
 

20 

18 

16 ~~---~.~

........
 14 .. .......
 . .. . .. .. ....... p .... -- .. .. .... ... ....
 

... .. ..., ... .§ 12 

OJ 

3 

c: 

0 

'.;J 10 

-

ro

...

c: 

Q) 

u ...... Median c: 8 0 

(J 

--- Maximum Site 6 

-~- Minimum Site 4 

2 

o .1-1 ---,- --,-- ----- --,-- _ 

1999-2001 2000-2002 2001-2003 2002-2004 2003-2005 2004-2006 2005-2007 2006-2008 2007-2009 2008·2010 

Appendix D 14
PM 2.

5 Concentrations in New Jersey
 

Daily Design Values 1999·2010
 

70 

Former Daily PM2.

5 NAAQS =65.0 pg/m3 

60 

50 

M 

E 

01 /'~--~"~ .3 40 ._- - --- '-'-------­ c .'-..... g ..'_ .....It "'",";: - .... .- .- ... ~- -.-._..., ... ".,."- '-. .. .. - - - -~.- .... _. - .- ._ .. _. .... ,"". """"" ::"""..,.. .. .... .---~.-' .. - .... ­

..... 3 c Ne~ .Daily'Pfv12..s. ~AAas---"'-35-cQ~g/m 8 .. 30 . .. c '"' ........
 o 

u 

20 

10 

o -1'-----------..,--- -:- ..,- -'- ----,.. ...1 

1999-2001 2000-2002 2001-2003 2002-2004 2003-2005 2004-2006 2005-2007 2006-2008 2007-2009 2008·2010 

Median ---- Maximum Site Minimum Site 

Appendix D 15
Attachment 5
 

PM2.5 Control Measure Summary
 

Appendix D 16
New Jersey Control Strategies 

New Jersey has taken significant actions to reduce the emissions offine particle matter 

(PM2.5) and its precursors, as demonstrated in several recent State Implementation Plan revisions 

(8-hour ozone - October 2007, PM2.S - March 2009, Regional Haze - July 2009). 

This attachment includes a summary of federal and state control measures that have 

resulted in a reduction of emissions ofPM2.s and its precursors (oxides of nitrogen and sulfur 

dioxide). These emission reductions and other reductions resulting from actions by the other 

states in our multi-state nonattainment area have helped New Jersey and our multi-state 

nonattainment area to attain the annual and daily PM2.S standards. Additionally, the United 

States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) determined that the Northern New JerseyNew York-Long Island (NNJ-NY-CT) PM2.5 nonattainment area has attained the 1997 annual 

PM2.5 NAAQS for the 2007-2009 monitoring period. The USEPA issued a clean data 

determination for the area on November 15, 2010 (75 FR 69589). 

Appendix D 17
I I I 

PM2.5 Control Measure Summary, 2002 Base Year Inventory I I 

I 

Last Updated 7/29/11 j , 

I f 

I 

New Jersey I 

I Administrative 

Code (NJAC} 

Federal Energy Conservation Standards for New I N/A ! 

!Federal Commercial and Multi-Family High-Rise I I Residential Buildings and New Federal Low­ ; ! 

iRise Residential Buildings I , I I 

Federal I Residential Woodstove NSPS I N/A I N/A Area I PM, NOx, 

I ! I I CO, voe 

Federal lonroad Refueling Vapor Recovery (ORVR) I N/A 

I 

N/A ArealOnroad i VOC 

bevond Staae II I

Federal ;Diesel Marine Enclnes over 37 kW I 

I N/A I N/A Nonroad NOx, VOC 

Federal ILarge Industrial Spark-Ignition Engines over 19 I N/A ! 

,kW I i 

Federal Locomotive Engines and Marine Compression- N/A ! 

Ignition Engines Less Than 30 Liters per i 

Cylinder I 

Federal INew Nonroad Engine Standards I N/A I 

, 

i I 

I 

Federal INonroad Diesel Engines 

! 

N/A 

I 

N/A , Nonroad I PM, NOx, 

I 

I I , CO,VOC 

Federa! IPhase 2 Standards for New Nonroad SparkI 

N/A N/A 

I 

Nonroad I NOx, VOC, 

I,gnition Nonhandheld Engines at or below 19 I CO 

,kW I ..I 

Federal I~hase 2 Standards for Small Spark-Ignition 

I 

N/A 

I 

N/A I Nonroad : NOx, VOC, 

Handheld Engines at or below 19 kW I CO 

Federal IRecreational Vehicles (includes snowmobiles, I 

I N/A N/A Nonroad I NOx, CO,

ioff-highway motorcycles, and all-terrain , 

I ! HC, 

Ivehicles) i I 

Federal [Heavy Duty Diesel Vehicle (HDDV) Defeat I N/A I N/A Onroad 

! 

i NOx

IDevice Settlement I 

! 

Federal Heavy Duty Diesel Vehicle (HDDV) Engine N/A 

I 

N/A Onroad NOx, HC 

Standards I 

I 

Federal National Low Emission Vehicle Program N/A 

I 

N/A I Onroad I PM, NOx, 

(NLEV) CO,VOC 

Federal Tier 1 Vehicle Program I N/A I N/A Onroad PM, NOx, I 

: ! . CO, NMHC 

Federal iTier 2 Vehicle Program/Low Sulfur Fuels I N/A I N/A Onroad S02 

Federal Acid Rain N/A N/A Point S02 

Federal !Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR) I N/A N/A Point , I S02' NO. 

Federal IRefinery Consent Decrees (Sunoco, Valero) 

I 

N/A I N/A Point I PM, S02' I 

I , I NO. I , 

Federal IRefinery Consent Decrees (Sunoco, Valero, I N/A I N/A 

I 

Point I PM, S02. 

and ConocoPhillips) I i i NO. : 

Federal IUSEPA MACT Standards including Industrial I N/A I N/A I Point i VOC, HAP I 

Boiler/Process Heater MACT i 

New Jersey IArchitectural Coatings 2005 NJAC 7:27-23 11/30/2005 Area voe 

New Jersey Asphalt Pavina I NJAC 7:27-16.19 I 8/3/2010 Area VOC 

New Jerse~ Consumer Products 2005 I NJAC 7:27-24 1/25/2006 Area I voe 

New Jersev Consumer Products 2009 Amendments ! NJAC 7:27-24 I 7/22/2010 Area VOC 

New Jersey .Mobile Equipment Repair and RefinishinL-1 NJAe 7:27-16.12 I 7/2/2004 Area I voe 

New Jersev Smoke Management I 

, N/A I N/A I Area PM

I 

EPA .,	 I Sector Pollutants 

Approval 

N/A Area	 I NOx, S02 

I 

N/A	 i Nonroad I NOx. CO 

N/A PM, NOx, 

(CO, VOC) 

Nonroad 

N/A Nonroad VOC, NOx, 

:PM 

Appendix D 18
PM2.5 Control Measure Summary, 2002 Base Year Inventory I, I 

I I I

Last Updated 7129/11 I I 

r 

I 

New Jersey EPA I Sector Pollutants 

Administrative Approval I 

Code INJAC\ 

New Jersey IStage I and Stage II (Gasoline Transfer 

I 

NJAC 7:27-16.3 I 71212004 Lea 

\ 

VOC 

Operations) ! , 

New Jersey I Portable Fuel Containers 2005 I NJAC 7:27-24 11/25/2006 I Area and VOC 

Nonroad 

New Jersey Portable Fuel Containers 2009 Amendments I NJAC 7:27-24 I 7/2212010 I Area and VOC 

I Nonroad 

New Jersey Adhesives and Sealants 

I 

NJAC 7:27-26 I 7/2212010 I Area and 

II 

VOC 

'I 'I Point 

New Jersey IDiesel Risk Reduction Efforts at Ports I N/A N/A Nonroad PM 

New Jersey I Diesel Idling Rule Amendments I NJAC 7:27-14.1, I 4/14/2009 I Onroad I PM2.5, NO. I 

I I 14.3 I , 

New Jersey I Diesel Smoke (11M Cutpoint) Rule Amendments I NJAC 7:27-14 TBD I Onroad PM2.5, NO. 

I 

New Jersey INew Jersey Heavy Duty Diesel Rules InclUding NJAC 7:27-2612818127120071 Onroad PM, S02, 

,"Not-To-Exceed" (NTE) Requirements I I NOx 

i I 

New Jersey New Jersey Low Emission Vehicle (LEV) NJAC 7:27-29 

I 

2/13/2008 I Onroad I PM,802, 

Program I NO., VOC, 

-,

New Jersey On-Board Diagnostics (OBO) - (11M) Program I NJAC 7:27-15 I I 5/21/2004 Onroad [VOC, NOx, 

for Gasoline Vehicles I I I CO -' New Jersey IAsphalt Production Plants Rule I NJAC 7:27-19.9 I 8/3/2010 Point I NO. 

New Jersey Case by Case NO. Emission Limit 

I 

NJAC 7:27-19.13 8/3/2010 I Point I NOx 

Determinations (FSELs/AELs) 

New Jersey lEGU Consent Decrees (PSE&G Hudson NO.) I N/A N/A I Point PM, NOx 

! I 

New Jersey IEGU Consent Decrees (PSE&G Hudson S02) i N/A N/A 

I 

Point PM, S02 

'I i 

New Jersey !EGU Consent Decrees (PSE&G Mercer) I N/A I N/A Point 

I 

PM, S02, 

, , NO. I I 

I 

New Jersey EGU - BL England ACO 

i 

N/A 

I 

N/A II 

Point PM:S02, 

NO. 

New Jersey IEGUs - Coal-fired Boilers 

I NJAC 7:27-4.2, 8/3/2010 Point 

I 

PM,502, 

I 10.2,19.4 NO. 

New Jersey IEGU5. Oil and Gas Fired 

I 

NJAC 7:27-4.2, 8/3/2010 Point NO. 

10.2,19.4 

New Jersey !Glass Manufacturing NJAC 7:27-19.10 8/3/2010 Point NO. , 

New Jersey High Electric Demand Day (HEDD) Program NJAC 7:27-19.29 8/3/2010 I Point I S02' NO. I 

New Jersey 'ICI Boiler Rule 2009 NJAC 7:27-19.7 8/3/2010 I Point I NO. 

New Jersey Municipal Waste Combustors (Incinerators) NJAC 7:27-19.13 8/3/2010 1 Point NOx 

NO. portion I 

New Jersey [Municipal Waste Combustors (Incinerators) PM II NJAC 7:27-19.13 8/3/2010 Point PM 

]portion I 

New Jersey Nonattainment New Source Review (NNSR) N/A I N/A Point 

New Jersey NO. Budget Program (SIP Call) NJAC 7:27-27.31 5/22/2001 Point NO. 

New Jersey NO. RACT Rule (2006) I NJAC 7:27-27.19 7/31/2007 POln~

I .Il.re.:l , ' 

New Jersey~USEPA CTGs (4 categories) I NJAC 7:27-16.7 8/3/2010 Point I VOC 

New Jersey lVOC Stationary Storage Tank Measures I NJAC 7:27-16.2 I 8/3/2010 Point VOC 

Appendix D 19
PM2.5 Control Measure Summary, 2002 Base Year Inventory I ! 1 

L.ast Updated 7/29/11 I New Jersey 

Administrative 

I 

, 

I 

j 

EPA 

Approval 

i

I 

I 

Sector 

I 

I

IPollutant, 

I Code lNJAC\ I I 

New Jersey ILow Sulfur Distillate and Residual Fuel .NJAC 7:27-27.9 I TBD Point and S02, NOx 

IStrateoies i

, I 

I 1 Area \ 

New Jersey ISolvent Cleaning i NJAC 7:27-16.6 I 7/2/2004 Point and I voe I Area 

New Jersey ISewage and Sludge Incinerators I NJAC 7:27-19.28\ 8/3/2010 I Point I NOx 

..
 

Appendix D 20