CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD 

### AP **CD/ AQ**  **MD RULE EVA LUA** **TION FORM --**  **Page 1** 

(Electronic Format) **I. GENER**  **AL INFORM**  **AT ION**  District: Yolo
- Solano Air Quality Management District Rule No(s): 2.22 Date adopted/Amended/Rescinded: Januar y 14, 2015 Rule Title(s): Gasoline Dispensing Facilities Date Submitted to ARB: March 20, 2015 I f an Amended Rule, Date Last Amended (or Adopted): June 12, 2002 Is the Rule Intended to be Sent to the U.S. EPA as a SIP Revision? Yes No ( If No, do not complete remainder of form) District Contact: Frank DeMaris Phone Number: 530
- 757 - 3667 E
- ma il Address: fdemaris@ysaqmd.org Narrative Summary

of New Rule or Rule Changes: New Rule Am ended Rule The rule was amended to provide exemptions from Phase II EVR for E85 operations, ORVR
- equipped captive fleets, and non
- retail existing aboveground storage tanks. In addition, certain compliance notification requirements have been relaxed to be more realistic or because the original requirement is no longer applicable. Pollutant(s) Regulated by the Rule (Check): ROG (NOx ) SO2 (CO) PM TAC (name): **II. EFFECT ON EMISSIONS**  Complete this section ONLY for rules that, when implemented, will result in quantifiable changes in emissions. Attach refere nce(s) for emission factor(s) and other info rmation. Attach calculation sheet showing how the emission information provided below was determined
. Net Effect on Emissions: Increase Decrease N/A Em ission Reduction Commitment in SIP for this Source Categor y: Inventor y Year Used to Calculate Changes in Em issions: Area Affected: Future Year Control Profile Estimate (Provide information on as many years as possible) :CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD 

### AP **CD/ AQ**  **MD RULE EVA LUA** **TION FORM --**  **Page 2** 

(Electronic Format)

Baseline Inventor y in the SIP for the Control Measure: Em issions Reduction Commitment in the SIP for the Control Measure: Revised Baseline Inventor y (if any): Revised Emission Reduction Estimate (if developed): Note that the district’

s input to the Rule Evaluation Form will not be used as input to the ARB’ s emission forecasting and planning. **III. SOURCES/A** 

**TTA INMENT STA** 

**TUS** District is: Attainment Nonattainment Split Approximate Total Number of Small (<100 TPY) Sources Affected by this Amendment: 200 Percent in Nonattainment Area: 100 % Number of Large ( > 100 TPY) Sources Controlled: 0 Percent in Nonattainment Area: % Name(s) and Location(s) (city and county) of Large ( > 100 TPY) Sources Contro lled by Rule (Attach additional sheets as necessary) : **IV. EM**  **ISSION REDUCTION TECHNOLOGY** Does the Rule Include Emission Limits that are Continuous? Yes No If Yes, Those Limits are in Section(s) of the Rule. Other Methods in the Rule for Achieving Emission Reductions are: **V. OTHER REQUIREMENTS**  The Rule Contains: Em ission Limits in Section(s): Wo rk Practice Standards in Section(s): 300 Recordkeeping Requirements in Section(s): 500 Reporting Requirements in Section(s): 500CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD 

### AP **CD/ AQ**  **MD RULE EVA**  **LUA TION FORM**  **-- Page**  **3**

(Electronic Format)

5/1/2002 3

**VI. IMPA**  **CT ON A IR QUA**  **LITY PL AN**  No Impact Impacts RFP Impacts attainment Discussion: