alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

                                                                  

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1998
<CASH>                                          88,527
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  932,745
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,678,200
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,964,979
<PP&E>                                       3,800,379
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,233,763
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,740,947
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,412,179
<BONDS>                                        462,632
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     15,010
<COMMON>                                        47,283
<OTHER-SE>                                  21,826,025
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,740,947
<SALES>                                      9,842,365
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             9,900,628
<CGS>                                        6,850,139
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,050,139
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,491,601
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (449,062)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (936,042)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            488,162
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   488,162
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .17
        

</TABLE>
# State-by-State

X0A0T

X0A1T

X0A2T

X0A3T

X0A4T

X0A5T

X0A6T

X0A7T

X0A8T

X0A9T

X0A10T

X0A11T

X0A12T

X0A13T

X0A14T

X0A15T

X0A16T

X0A17T

X0A18T

X0A19T

X0A20T

X0A21T

X0A22T

X0A23T

X0A24T

X0A25T

X0A26T

X0A27T

X0A28T

X0A29T

X0A30T

X0A31T

X0A32T

X0A33T

X0A34T

X0A35T

X0A36T

X0A37T

X0A38T

X0A39T

X0A40T

X0A41T

X0A42T

X0A43T

X0A44T

X0A45T

X0A46T

X0A47T

X0A48T

X0A49T

X0A50T

X0A51T

X0A52T

X0A53T

X0A54T

X0A55T

X0A56T

X0A57T

X0A58T

X0A59T
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION IX 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, CA 94105-3901

May 13. 2009 Michael 

### H. Scheible Deputy Executive Officer California Air Resources Board Post Office Box 281 

### 5 Sacramento, .CA 958 12

/On April 6, 2009, CARB submitted revisionsto the California StateImplementation Plan (SIP). We have reviewed materials submittedwith the following rules and found that they fulfill the completeness criteria in 40 CFR Part 51, Appendix V.
Antelope Valley 

### ( 461 

## 1 Gasoline Transfer and Dispensing Placer County 

## 1 516 

## I Rice StrawEmission Reduction Credits APCDIAQMD San Joaquin Valley 4 103 

## / Open Burning South Coast 

## 1 1125 

## 1 Metal Container, Closure, and Coil Coating Rule #

Components at Petroleum Facilities and Chemical Plants Rule Title

South Coast South Coast South Coast -- South Coast

This addresses all revisions in this submittal. In the coming months we will review the complete revisions for action pursuant to Clean Air Act section 110(k). Questions regarding our completenessreview should be directed to Cynthia 

### G. Allen at (415) 947-4 120. 1149 1151 1162 

# w'
Deborah Jordan Operations StorageTank and Pipeline Cleaning and Degassing Motor Vehicle and Mobile Equipment NonAssembly Line Coating Operations Polyester Resin Operations

Director, Air Division 1173 ( Control of VOC Leaks and Releases from

Printed on Recycled Paper

### Cc: Mr. Eldon Heaston Executive Director Antelope Valley AQNlD Mr. Thomas J. Christofk, APCO Placer CountyAPCD Mr. Seyed Sadredin, APCO San Joaquin Valley Unified APCD Dr. BanyWallerstein Executive Officer South Coast AQMD Mr. Jorge 

### L. Fernandez, Chief Program Evaluation Branch, 

### CARB
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.

SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Wayne J. Conner, Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
of Elgin National Industries, Inc., certify that:



| | 3. | This quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Elgin National Industries, Inc. fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 4. | The information contained in this quarterly report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Elgin National Industries, Inc.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/    WAYNE J. CONNERWayne J. ConnerVice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer




Date: May 13, 2005
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-10879 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. LEWIS EDWARD MARTIN, a/k/a Robert North, a/k/a Mike Tomaz, Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:96-CR-017-A

_________________________________________________________________ March 19, 1997 Before KING, JOLLY, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Lewis Edward Martin has appealed the sentences imposed following entry of his guilty pleas to counts 1 and 3 of an indictment charging him with conspiracy to commit mail fraud and with mail fraud and aiding and abetting. The district court’s findings as to the amount of the intended loss were not clearly erroneous. United States v. Ismoila , 100 F.3d 380, 396 (5th Cir. 1996). “The court need only make a reasonable estimate of the loss, given the available2

information.” United States v. Chappell , 6 F.3d 1095, 1101 (5th Cir. 1993)(internal quotations omitted), cert. denied , 510 U.S. 1183 (1994), and cert. denied , 510 U.S. 1184 (1994). Martin introduced no evidence showing that he intended to limit the scope of the conspiracy. See United States v. Gray , ___ F.3d ____ (5th Cir. Jan. 29, 1997), 1997 WL 33622 at *11. The alleged impossibility of completion of the attempted offense does not, under the facts of this case, provide a basis for reversal. Ismoila , 100 F.3d at 396-97. Martin argues that the district court abused its discretion in failing to award him an adjustment in offense level for acceptance of responsibility. Although the district court characterized the issue as a close question, it held that Martin had failed to carry his burden of proof and adopted the probation officer’s recommendation. This conclusion was not clearly

erroneous. See United States v. Maldonado , 42 F.3d 906, 913 (5th Cir. 1995).
AFFIRMED.
**MEMORANDUM**

TO:Principal Officers

FROM:The Secretary

SUBJECT:Delegation of Authority

I. DELEGATION

Under the authority vested in me by section 412 of the Department of Education Organization Act (DEOA) (Public Law 96-88), 20 U.S.C. 3472, I hereby delegate to you for employees in your Principal Office the authority described in 34 C.F.R. Part 8 regarding demands issued to Departmental employees for testifying or records in legal proceedings.  This authority only applies to legal proceedings in which the United States is not a party.

Unless otherwise noted in future delegations of authority, amendments to the existing authorities delegated herein are included within the scope of this delegation.

II. RESERVATION

The authority should be exercised in consultation with the Office of the General Counsel.

III. REDELEGATION

This authority may be redelegated to Senior officials in your office who report directly to you.  No other redelegation is permitted.

IV. CERTIFICATION AND EFFECTIVE DATE

This delegation is effective upon certification by the Department’s Principal Delegations Control Officer and supersedes all previous delegations of this authority.

_______/s/___________

        Richard W. Riley

Page 2 – Delegation of Authority

OGC Clearance and Date:/s/ R. Wexler, 9/2/92

Certified Date:   9/4/92

Control No.    EA/EC/150

Certified by:   /s/ Wilma J. Hodo______________

                       Departmental Delegations Control Officer

Addressees:

Principal Officers and List and PO Control No.

EA/EB/132 – Deputy Secretary

EA/EC/150 – Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights

EA/EE/3 – Assistant Secretary for Policy and Planning

EA/EF/58 – Inspector General

EA/EG/54 – General Counsel

EA/EH/61 – Assistant Secretary for Special Education and Rehabilitative Services

EA/EJ/22 - Assistant Secretary for Legislation and Congressional Affairs

EA/EK/75 - Assistant Secretary for Intergovernmental and Interagency Affairs

EA/EL/43 – Assistant Secretary for Management and Budget/CFO

EA/EM/180 – Assistant Secretary for Human Resources and Administration

EA/EP/183 - Assistant Secretary for Postsecondary Education

EA/ES/42 - Assistant Secretary for Elementary and Secondary Education

EA/ET/34 - Director, OBEMLA

EA/EV/40 - Assistant Secretary for Vocational and Adult Education

EA/EI/2 – Chief Information Officer

 EA/EN/2 – Chief Operating Officer, FSA

EA/EQ/2 – Deputy Under Secretary for Safe and Drug-Free Schools

EA/ER/1 – Director, Institute of Education Sciences

EA/EU/2 – Deputy Under Secretary for Innovation and Improvement
#### Keel Manufacturing, Inc., Respondent, v Raleigh Records, Inc., et al., Appellants, and David I. Burstein et al., Respondents.

— Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on June 29, 1978, unanimously affirmed. Petitioner-respondent shall recover of the respondents-appellants $50 costs and disbursements of this appeal. Application at time of oral argument by Louis Savrin, Esq., for permission to have William A. Zucker, Esq., a Massachusetts attorney, to argue this appeal for the petitioner-respondent granted. No opinion. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Kupferman, Birns, Markewich and Lupiano, JJ.
1233.211 Contracting officer's decision. ( a ) ( 4 )
( v ) In accordance with FAR 33.211(a)(4)(i) through (vi), contracting officers shall include in a statement of the contracting officer's decision referenced at FAR 33.211(a)(4)(iv), paragraphs substantially as follows:
“This is the final decision of the Contracting Officer. You may appeal this decision to the Civilian Board of Contract Appeals. If you decide to appeal, you must, within 90 days from the date you receive this decision, mail or otherwise furnish written notice to the Civilian Board of Contract Appeals as set forth below and provide a copy to the Contracting Officer from whose decision this appeal is taken. The notice shall indicate that an appeal is intended, reference this decision, and identify the contract by number. *Where to File:* All filings must be submitted to the Clerk of the Board. Filings shall be to Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, 1800 F Street NW, Washington, DC 20405 in any of the ways as set forth at their website at *https://cbca.gov/howto/index.html .* With regard to appeals to the Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, you may, solely at your election, proceed under the board's— (1) Small claim procedure for claims of $50,000 or less or, in the case of a small business concern (as defined in the Small Business Act and regulations under that Act), $150,000 or less; or (2) Accelerated procedure for claims of $100,000 or less. Instead of appealing to the Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, you may bring an action directly in the United States Court of Federal Claims (except as provided in 41 U.S.C. 7102(d), regarding Maritime Contracts) within 12 months of the date you receive this decision.”
**EXHIBIT
12.1**
 **CERTIFICATIONS**
 
 I, David
Wolfin, President of Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd., certify that:
 
 1.
    I
      have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Avino Silver & Gold
      Mines Ltd.;
 
 2.
    Based
      on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
      material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
      statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
      were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
      report;
 
 3.
    Based
      on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
      included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
      financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company
      as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
 
 4.
    The
      Company's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
      establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
      defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and
      have:
 
 (a)
    Designed
      such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
      controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
      that material information relating to the Company, including its
      consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
      prepared;
 
 (b)
    Omitted;
 
 (c)
    Evaluated
      the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures and
      presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
      disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by
      this report based on such evaluation; and
 
 (d)
    Disclosed
      in this report any change in the Company's internal control over financial
      reporting that occurred during the Company's period covered by the annual
      report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
      affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting; and
 
 5.
    The
      Company's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our
      most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
      the Company's auditors and the audit committee of the Company's board of
      directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 
 (a)
    All
      significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
      operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
      reasonably likely to adversely affect the Company's ability to record,
      process, summarize and report financial information; and
 
 (b)
    Any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the Company's internal control
      over financial reporting.
 
 Dated:
August 12, 2005      */s/
David Wolfin* ___________
 David Wolfin, President
 (Principal Executive Officer)
   57
1219.401 General. ( a ) The OSDBU Director will be the primary point of contact with the U.S. Small Business Administration and facilitate the formulation of policies to ensure maximum practicable opportunities are available to small business concerns in prime and subcontracting opportunities.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED January 15, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-11296 Summary Calendar

GEORGE WEBBER, Petitioner-Appellant,

versus COLE JETER, Warden, Federal Medical Center, Fort Worth, Respondent-Appellee.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:05-CV-594

-------------------- Before DeMOSS, STEWART, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * George Webber, federal prisoner # 14047-045, appeals the dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition, in which he challenged his sentence of 192 months of imprisonment for his 2002 conviction for distribution of cocaine base. Webber contends that his sentence is unconstitutional in light of United States v. Booker , 543 U.S. 220 (2005), and Blakely v. Washington , 542 U.S. 296 (2004), because it was based on facts that were not set forth in his indictment or proven beyond a reasonable doubt.No. 05-11296 -2- Webber’s claims based on alleged errors that occurred at sentencing may not be asserted in this § 2241 petition because they fail to satisfy the requirements of the savings clause in 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The district court properly dismissed Webber’s § 2241 petition for lack of jurisdiction. See Padilla v. United
States , 416 F.3d 424, 426-27 (5th Cir. 2005).
AFFIRMED.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

 

MEMORANDUM

TO: The Assistant Secretary for Finance and Operations

FROM: The Secretary

SUBJECT: Primary Delegation of Authority 

I. DELEGATION

Under the authority vested in me by section 412 of the Department of Education 

Organization Act (P.L. 96-88), 20 U.S.C. 3472, I hereby delegate to you, to your 

successor in function, and to anyone serving for you in an acting capacity, the 

authority to perform Department administrative and management functions that 

have not otherwise been delegated, including but not limited to human capital and 

human resources management, labor relations, training and development, 

organizational approval, facilities management, engineering, security,

administrative services, health and safety, and informal dispute resolution. 

You are also responsible for the Office of Hearings and Appeals and for 

administering the Department’s responsibilities under section 550(c) of the 

Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949, as amended (40 

U.S.C. 550(c)).

Unless otherwise specified in future delegations of authority, legislative 

amendments to the authorities delegated herein are included within the scope of 

this delegation. 

II. RESERVATIONS 

 

Unless otherwise noted in existing or future delegations of authority, the 

following are not delegated. 

A. the authority to sign Federal Register notices; 

B. the authority to award contracts and discretionary grants;
Page 2 – Delegation of Authority

C. the authority to appoint, and fix compensation of, members of advisory 

councils; and

D. unless otherwise provided by law, the authority to submit reports to 

Congress or the President. 

III. REDELEGATION

You may redelegate the authorities delegated to you and may authorize further 

redelegations.

IV. CERTIFICATION AND EFFECTIVE DATE

This delegation is effective upon certification of the Department’s Delegations 

Control Officer and supersedes delegation EA/EM/310, dated May 9, 2006. I 

hereby ratify actions within the scope of this delegation taken by you prior to 

certification of this delegation.

 __________/s___________ 

 Betsy DeVos

OGC Concurrence and Date: Michael Taylor; 6/24/2019 

Certified Date: 7/22/2019

Departmental Delegations Control Officer; Jim Clemmens

Control Number: EA/EK/203
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 5.1.1

Eastern Division

Regina McPheeters

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.:

1:12−cv−00592

Honorable John F.

Grady

Northeast Illinois Regional Commuter Railroad

Corporation, et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Wednesday, March 13, 2013:

 MINUTE entry before Honorable John F. Grady: Status hearing held. On the oral

motion of the plaintiff, this action is dismissed with prejudice. Civil case terminated.

Mailed notice(cdh, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:12-cv-00592 Document #: 23 Filed: 03/13/13 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:41
### §6931. Under Secretary of Agriculture for Farm Production and Conservation

#### (a) Authorization

The Secretary is authorized to establish in the Department the position of Under Secretary of Agriculture for Farm Production and Conservation.

#### (b) Confirmation required

If the Secretary establishes the position of Under Secretary of Agriculture for Farm Production and Conservation authorized under subsection (a), the Under Secretary shall be appointed by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate.

#### (c) Functions of Undersecretary 1

The Under Secretary of Agriculture for Farm Production and Conservation shall perform such functions and duties as the Secretary shall prescribe.

#### (d) Succession

Any official who is serving as Under Secretary of Agriculture for Farm and Foreign Agricultural Services on March 23, 2018, and who was appointed by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, shall not be required to be reappointed under subsection (b) to the successor position authorized under subsection (a).

(Pub. L. 103–354, title II, §225, Oct. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 3213; Pub. L. 115–141, div. A, title VII, §772(a)(2), Mar. 23, 2018, 132 Stat. 397.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section is comprised of section 225 of Pub. L. 103–354. Subsec. (e) of section 225 of Pub. L. 103–354 amended section 5314 of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees, and repealed section 5691 of this title.

Another section 225 of Pub. L. 103–354 is classified to section 6925 of this title.

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–141 amended section generally. Prior to amendment, section related to Under Secretary of Agriculture for Farm and Foreign Agricultural Services.

1 So in original. Probably should be "Under Secretary".
### **CHAPTER 114—AGRICULTURAL SECURITY**

Sec.
8901.
Definitions.

#### SUBCHAPTER I—AGRICULTURAL SECURITY

8911.
Repealed.
8912.
Agricultural biosecurity communication center.
8913.
Assistance to build local capacity in agricultural biosecurity planning, preparedness, and response.
8914.
Agriculture and food defense.

#### SUBCHAPTER II—OTHER PROVISIONS

8921.
Research and development of agricultural countermeasures.
8922.
Agricultural biosecurity grant program.
**MEMORANDUM**

**DATE:** 09/ 11 /2014 **FROM:** Laura Farris/EPA Region 8 **TO:** Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR

– 2013

- 0602 **SUBJECT:** Montana 111d Call held on 09/11 /2014 **SUMMARY :**  EPA p articipated in a conference call with the State of Montan a on 09/11 /2014 to discuss their question s about a mass - based goal under the Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants , which was proposed on June 2, 2014. **ATTENDEES: EPA Headquarters**  Gabrielle Stevens Mikhail Adamantiades Ryan Sims **EPA Region 8**  Laura Farris **External Stakeholders** Dave Klemp and Craig Henrikson, Montana Department of Environmental Quality