alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 703 Reported in Senate (RS)]

<DOC>

                                                       Calendar No. 132
115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 703

                          [Report No. 115-102]

 To extend the authority of the Secretary of the Interior to carry out 
            the Equus Beds Division of the Wichita Project.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 22, 2017

Mr. Moran (for himself and Mr. Roberts) introduced the following bill; 
   which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

                              June 8, 2017

              Reported by Ms. Murkowski, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To extend the authority of the Secretary of the Interior to carry out 
            the Equus Beds Division of the Wichita Project.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Wichita Project Equus Beds Division 
Authorization Extension Act''.

SEC. 2. EQUUS BEDS DIVISION.

    Section 10(h) of Public Law 86-787 (74 Stat. 1026; 120 Stat. 1474) 
is amended by striking ``10 years'' and inserting ``20 years''.
                                                       Calendar No. 132

115th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                 S. 703

                          [Report No. 115-102]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 To extend the authority of the Secretary of the Interior to carry out 
            the Equus Beds Division of the Wichita Project.

_______________________________________________________________________

                              June 8, 2017

                       Reported without amendment
```
### §8758. Adjustments of loans

#### (a) Adjustment authority

The Secretary may make appropriate adjustments in the loan rates for peanuts for differences in grade, type, quality, location, and other factors.

#### (b) Manner of adjustment

The adjustments under subsection (a) shall, to the maximum extent practicable, be made in such a manner that the average loan level for peanuts will, on the basis of the anticipated incidence of the factors, be equal to the level of support determined in accordance with this subchapter and subtitles B, D, and E.

#### (c) Adjustment on county basis

#### (1) In general

Subject to paragraph (2), the Secretary may establish loan rates for a crop of peanuts for producers in individual counties in a manner that results in the lowest loan rate being 95 percent of the national average loan rate, if those loan rates do not result in an increase in outlays.

#### (2) Prohibition

Adjustments under this subsection shall not result in an increase in the national average loan rate for any year.

(Pub. L. 110–234, title I, §1308, May 22, 2008, 122 Stat. 977; Pub. L. 110–246, §4(a), title I, §1308, June 18, 2008, 122 Stat. 1664, 1705.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Subtitles B, D, and E, referred to in subsec. (b), are subtitles B (§1201 et seq.), D (§1401 et seq.), and E (§1501 et seq.), respectively, of title I of Pub. L. 110–246, June 18, 2008, 122 Stat. 1681. Subtitle B is classified generally to subchapter II (§8731 et seq.) of this chapter. Subtitle D enacted sections 1359kk, 1359ll, and 7287 of this title, amended sections 1359aa to 1359gg, 1359ii, 7272, and 7971 of this title, repealed former section 1359kk of this title, and enacted provisions set out as notes under sections 3602 and 7272 of this title. Subtitle E enacted subchapter IV (§8771 et seq.) of this chapter and amended sections 608c, 1637b, 4502, 4504, 4531, and 4553 of this title and section 713a–14 of Title 15, Commerce and Trade. For complete classification of subtitles B, D, and E to the Code, see Tables.

#### Codification

Pub. L. 110–234 and Pub. L. 110–246 enacted identical sections. Pub. L. 110–234 was repealed by section 4(a) of Pub. L. 110–246.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Enactment of this section and repeal of Pub. L. 110–234 by Pub. L. 110–246 effective May 22, 2008, the date of enactment of Pub. L. 110–234, see section 4 of Pub. L. 110–246, set out as a note under section 8701 of this title.
#### § 947.822 Special performance standards—operations on alluvial valley floors.

Part 822 of this chapter, *Special Performance Standards—Operations on Alluvial Valley Floors,* shall apply to any person who conducts surface coal mining and reclamation operations on alluvial valley floors, except in those coalfields in Washington west of the crest of the Cascade Mountain Range.

[48 FR 22292, May 18, 1983]
### §229. Repealed. Pub. L. 110–234, title XI, 11004(b), May 22, 2008, 122 Stat. 1356, and Pub. L. 110–246, §4(a), title XI, §11004(b), June 18, 2008, 122 Stat. 1664, 2118

Section, act Aug. 15, 1921, ch. 64, title IV, §416, as added Pub. L. 110–234, title XI, §11004(a)(2), May 22, 2008, 122 Stat. 1355, and Pub. L. 110–246, §4(a), title XI, §11004(a)(2), June 18, 2008, 122 Stat. 1664, 2117, related to annual reports about investigations and enforcement actions.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Pub. L. 110–234 and Pub. L. 110–246 repealed this section. Pub. L. 110–234 was repealed by section 4(a) of Pub. L. 110–246.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 416 of act Aug. 15, 1921, was renumbered section 417 and is classified to section 229c of this title.

Another prior section 416 of act Aug. 15, 1921, was classified to section 229a of this title, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 106–78.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Pub. L. 110–234, title XI, 11004(b), May 22, 2008, 122 Stat. 1356, and Pub. L. 110–246, §4(a), title XI, §11004(b), June 18, 2008, 122 Stat. 1664, 2118, provided that the repeal of this section is effective Sept. 30, 2012 [extended to Sept. 30, 2013, see section 701(a) of Pub. L. 112–240, set out in a 1-Year Extension of Agricultural Programs note under section 8701 of this title].

[Pub. L. 110–234 and Pub. L. 110–246 enacted identical provisions. Pub. L. 110–234 was repealed by section 4(a) of Pub. L. 110–246, set out as a note under section 8701 of this title.]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 5.0.3

Eastern Division

Rude Music Inc

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:12−cv−00640

Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly

Newt 2012, Inc., et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Monday, July 9, 2012:

 MINUTE entry before Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly:Status hearing pursuant to

Rule 16(b) held with attorneys for both sides. Settlement Conference set for 7/30/2012 at

02:00 PM. Mediation statements are to be served by 7/26/2012. (or, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:12-cv-00640 Document #: 47 Filed: 07/09/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:265
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                5


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                  JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                          844
<SECURITIES>                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                   0
<ALLOWANCES>                    0
<INVENTORY>                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                844
<PP&E>                          0
<DEPRECIATION>                  0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  844
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           10,350
<BONDS>                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     0
<COMMON>                        2,070
<OTHER-SE>                      (11,576)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    844
<SALES>                         0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                0
<CGS>                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   54,533
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 (54,533)
<INCOME-TAX>                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             (54,533)
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    (54,533)
<EPS-BASIC>                   (.0)
<EPS-DILUTED>                   (.0)



</TABLE>
No. 263.

#### B. T. Backus *v.*Norfolk Southern Railroad Company.

Error to the Supreme Court of Appeals of the State of Virginia.

Argued March 22, 1920.

Decided April 19, 1920.

*Mr. J. Edward Cole,*with whom *Mr. Edward R.-Baird, Jr.,*was on the briefs, for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. Jas. G. Martin*for defendant in error.

*Per Curiam.*

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of § 237 of the Judicial Code, as amended by the Act of September 6, 1916, c. 448, § 2, 39 Stat. 726.
Exhibit
      24




PPL
      CORPORATION





2006
      ANNUAL REPORT


TO
      THE
      SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


ON
      FORM
      10-K





POWER
      OF ATTORNEY




The
      undersigned directors of PPL Corporation, a Pennsylvania corporation, that
      is to
      file with the Securities and Exchange Commission, Washington, D.C., under the
      provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, its 2006 Annual
      Report on Form 10-K, do hereby appoint each of James H. Miller, John R. Biggar
      and Robert J. Grey their true and lawful attorney, with power to act without
      the
      other and with full power of substitution and resubstitution, to execute for
      them and in their names said Form 10-K Report and any and all amendments
      thereto, whether said amendments add to, delete from or otherwise alter said
      Form 10-K Report, or add or withdraw any exhibits or schedules to be filed
      therewith and any and all instruments in connection therewith. The undersigned
      hereby grant to each said attorney full power and authority to do and perform
      in
      the name of and on behalf of the undersigned, and in any and all capacities,
      any
      act and thing whatsoever required or necessary to be done in and about the
      premises, as fully and to all intents and purposes as the undersigned might
      do,
      hereby ratifying and approving the acts of each of the said
      attorneys.


IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have hereunto set their hands this 26th day
      of
      February, 2007.





/s/
                  Frederick M. Bernthal
                
                /s/
                  Craig A. RogersonFrederick
                    M. Bernthal
                
                Craig
                    A. Rogerson/s/
                  John W. Conway
                
                /s/
                  W. Keith SmithJohn
                    W. Conway
                
                W.
                    Keith Smith/s/
                  E. Allen Deaver
                
                /s/
                  Susan M. StalneckerE.
                    Allen Deaver
                
                Susan
                    M. Stalnecker/s/
                  Louise K. Goeser
                
                /s/
                  Keith H. WilliamsonLouise
                    K. Goeser
                
                Keith
                    H. Williamson/s/
                  Stuart HeydtStuart
                    Heydt
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 5.0.3

Eastern Division

Barry Bonazzi

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:12−cv−00664

Honorable Elaine E. Bucklo

Emeritus Corporation

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Thursday, August 2, 2012:

 MINUTE entry before Honorable Elaine E. Bucklo: Parties report settlement has

been reached. This case is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to settlement. All pending

dates and motions are terminated as moot. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice (jdh)

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:12-cv-00664 Document #: 18 Filed: 08/02/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:47
#### § 770.50 Entry restrictions.

Except for military personnel and civilian employees of the United States in the performance of their official duties, entry upon Puget Sound Naval Shipyard, or remaining thereon by any person for any purpose without advance consent of the Commander, Puget Sound Naval Shipyard or his/her authorized representative, is prohibited.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000032621
<NAME> EMERSON RADIO CORP.
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-02-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-01-1999
<CASH>                                           5,189
<SECURITIES>                                     1,146
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,502
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,726
<INVENTORY>                                     10,359
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                32,034
<PP&E>                                           4,375
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,100
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  55,443
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           23,300
<BONDS>                                         20,750
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      3,343
<COMMON>                                           513
<OTHER-SE>                                       7,338
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    55,443
<SALES>                                         30,588
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                31,588
<CGS>                                           26,949
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   26,949
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,698
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 (181)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 620
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    306
<INCOME-TAX>                                       (4)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                310
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       310
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01
        

</TABLE>
#### 1206.302 Circumstances permitting other than full and open competition.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

EARTHCOMBER, LLC,

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

REDFIN CORPORATION, 

 Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 12-cv-0392

Hon. Milton I. Shadur

Magistrate Judge Kim

PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL 

Plaintiff Earthcomber, LLC, by its undersigned counsel and pursuant to Rule 

41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, hereby voluntarily dismisses this action, 

without prejudice, against Defendant Redfin Corporation.

Dated: March 12, 2012 Respectfully submitted,

EARTHCOMBER, LLC

By: ______________________

 One of its Attorneys

Joseph J. Siprut 

jsiprut@siprut.com

Aleksandra M. S. Vold 

avold@siprut.com

SIPRUT PC

122 South Michigan Avenue

Suite 1850

Chicago, Illinois 60603

312.588.1440

Fax: 312.427.1850

4811-4172-3151, v. 1

Case: 1:12-cv-00392 Document #: 10 Filed: 03/12/12 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:65
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned, an attorney, hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the 

foregoing Plaintiff’s Notice of Voluntary Dismissal was filed this 12th day of March, 2012, via 

the electronic filing system of the Northern District of Illinois, which will automatically serve all 

counsel of record.

_________________________

Joseph J. Siprut

Case: 1:12-cv-00392 Document #: 10 Filed: 03/12/12 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:66
§ 67.6 Procedures. ( a ) An unaccredited educational institution may obtain designation as a qualifying educational institution for a specific Reserve component officer who graduated from that educational institution by providing certification from registrars at three accredited educational institutions that maintain ROTC programs that their educational institutions would accept at least 90 percent of the credit hours earned by that officer at the unaccredited educational institution, as of the year of graduation.
( b ) For an unaccredited educational institution to be designated as a qualifying educational institution for a specific year, that educational institution must provide the Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Reserve Affairs certification from the registrars at three different accredited educational institutions that maintain ROTC programs listing the major field(s) of study in which that educational institution would accept at least 90 percent of the credit hours earned by a student who was awarded a baccalaureate degree in that major field of study at the unaccredited educational institution.
( c ) For an unaccredited educational institution to be considered for designation as a qualifying educational institution, the unaccredited educational institution must submit the required documentation no later than January 1 of the year for which the unaccredited educational institution seeks to be designated a qualifying educational institution.
( d ) The required documentation must be sent to the following address: Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Reserve Affairs, Attn: DASD (M&P), 1500 Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-1500.
( e ) Applications containing the required documentation may also be submitted at any time from unaccredited educational institutions requesting designation as a qualifying educational institution for prior school years.
#### In the Matter of Teddy Cab Corporation, Appellant. Martin P. Catherwood, as Industrial Commissioner, Respondent.

Decision affirmed, with $50 costs. No opinion. Bergan, P. J., Gibson, Herlihy and Reynolds, JJ., concur.
1242.102 Assignment of contract audit services. ( b ) In accordance with 1242.101, when the responsible audit agency declines a request for services, DOT contracting officers may utilize audit services from commercial CPA firms as authorized in 1242.101.
^ 13.- IS"- 00£PO-Cl/ O^^^eu^t^i^O^u^
^tlfiTJiriU^ |3. -ly-OC^P-Cf, 12th CourtofAppeals District U-^^fccfcvO _ . . SEP 28 20)5 

## *i to»^ij<Si^4&3^ i J^ ,TYLER TEXAS ESTES./CLERK



## TV;13^ ^ "^ &^ **-A.

Uu^D^^J^ ,sr.7 W^f-4-^4-^^ 

# ®£'^l^j ^^' y2< 

### W 

### %Wrn+J
§ 99.3 General definitions. For the purposes of §§ 99.1 through 99.9 of this part: *Criminal history record information:* information collected by criminal justice agencies on individuals consisting of identifiable descriptions and notations of arrests, indictments, information, or other formal criminal charges and any disposition arising therefrom, sentencing, correction supervision, and release. The term does not include identification information such as fingerprint records to the extent that such information does not indicate involvement of the individual in the criminal justice system. The term does not include those records of a State or locality sealed pursuant to law from access by State and local criminal justice agencies of that State or locality.
*Criminal justice agency:* Federal, State, and local agencies including ( a ) courts, or
( b ) a government agency or any subunit thereof which performs the administration of criminal justice pursuant to a statute or executive order, and which allocates a substantial part of its annual budget to the administration of criminal justice.
*Department of Defense:* the Defense Investigative Service, National Security Agency, Naval Investigative Service, Air Force Office of Special Investigations, and Army Intelligence and Security Command.
*Federal agency:* the Department of Defense, the Office of Personnel Management, or the Central Intelligence Agency, or any other Federal agency subsequently authorized by Congress to obtain access to criminal history records information.
*Locality:* any local government authority or agency or component thereof within a State having jurisdiction over matters at a county, municipal or other local government level.
*State:* any of the several States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Northern Mariana Islands, Guam, the Virgin Islands, American Samoa, the Trust Territory of Pacific Islands, and any other territory or possession of the United States.
#### In the Matter of the Accounting of Peter H. Harp, as Executor of Joseph I. Furman, Deceased, Respondent. Bertha M. Quimby, Appellant; Robert A. Decker et al., Respondents.

-Decree modified, on the law and the facts, by increasing the amount directed to be paid to the claimant-appellant, Quimby, by the executor to the sum of $2,500 and as so modified affirmed, with costs to appellant. In our opinion the value of the services rendered was in this amount. Bergan, P. J., Gibson, Herlihy and Taylor, JJ., concur.
#### A. Fajer Imp. E Exp. Ltda, Doing Business as Dialom Brasil, Appellant, v Schick Technologies, Inc., Respondent.

[832 NYS2d 814]

In an action to recover damages for breach of contract and libel, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Dollard, J.), dated August 8, 2005, which granted the defendant’s motion pursuant to CFLR 3103 for a protective order prohibiting the plaintiff from taking certain nonparty depositions and vacating those deposition notices.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

“ ‘While CFLR 3101 (a) provides for full disclosure of all evidence material and necessary to the prosecution or defense of an action, unlimited disclosure is not required, and supervision of disclosure is generally left to the trial court’s broad discretion’ ” *(Smith v Moore,*31 AD3d 628, 628 [2006], quoting *Blagrove v Cox,*294 AD2d 526, 526 [2002]). Here, the Supreme Court properly determined that the plaintiffs notices of certain nonparty depositions were untimely.

The plaintiff’s remaining contentions are without merit. Miller, J.P., Ritter, Covello and McCarthy, JJ., concur.