alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 901.1 Scope.

This part contains all rules applicable only within Alabama that have been adopted under the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977.

[47 FR 22057, May 20, 1982]
### §6416. Independent evaluation of programs

#### (a) Review and evaluation

The Comptroller General of the United States shall review and evaluate the order to—

(1) determine the effectiveness of the promotion program conducted under this chapter on fluid milk sales;

(2) determine if the assessments for the program have been passed back to milk producers by fluid milk processors; and

(3) make recommendations for future funding and assessment levels for the program.

#### (b) Report to Congress

The Comptroller General shall submit a report to the Committee on Agriculture of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry of the Senate on the valuations made under this section no later than January 1, 1995.

(Pub. L. 101–624, title XIX, §1999Q, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 3926.)
EXHIBIT 32 (a)

                             CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In  connection  with the  Annual  Report  of Enzo  Biochem,  Inc.,  and
Subsidiaries  ("the  Company")  on Form 10-K for the fiscal  year ended July 31,
2005 as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof
(the  "Report"),  I,  Elazar  Rabbani,  Ph.D.,  Chief  Executive  Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

               (1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section
13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


               (2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects,  the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





Dated: October 14, 2005                         By:  /s/ Elazar Rabbani, Ph.D.
                                                     -------------------------

                                                         Elazar Rabbani, Ph.D.
                                                         Chief Executive Officer



         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other  document  authenticating,   acknowledging,   or  otherwise  adopting  the
signature  that  appears in typed form  within  the  electronic  version of this
written statement  required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Act
Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 15








TXU Gas Company:

We have made a review, in accordance with standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants, of the unaudited condensed
consolidated interim financial information of TXU Gas Company and subsidiaries
(TXU Gas) for the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2003 and
2002, as indicated in our report dated August 12, 2003; because we did not
perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on that information.

We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included in TXU Gas'
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003, is
incorporated by reference in Registration Statements Nos. 333-85769,
333-85769-01, 333-85769-02 and 333-85769-03 on Form S-3.

We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under
the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration
Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or
certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.



DELOITTE & TOUCHE  LLP
Dallas, Texas
August 12, 2003
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 553 

To provide that chapter 1 of title 9 of the United States Code, relating 

to the enforcement of arbitration agreements, shall not apply to enrollment agreements made between students and certain institutions of higher education, and to prohibit limitations on the ability of students to 

pursue claims against certain institutions of higher education. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 7, 2017 

Mr. DURBIN (for himself, Mr. FRANKEN, Mr. WHITEHOUSE, Ms. WARREN, 

Mr. REED, Mr. BROWN, Mr. BLUMENTHAL, and Ms. HIRONO) introduced 

the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee 

on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To provide that chapter 1 of title 9 of the United States 

Code, relating to the enforcement of arbitration agreements, shall not apply to enrollment agreements made 

between students and certain institutions of higher education, and to prohibit limitations on the ability of students to pursue claims against certain institutions of 

higher education. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 553 IS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Court Legal Access 

3 and Student Support (CLASS) Act of 2017’’. 

4 SEC. 2. INAPPLICABILITY OF CHAPTER 1 OF TITLE 9, 

5 UNITED STATES CODE, TO ENROLLMENT 

6 AGREEMENTS MADE BETWEEN STUDENTS 

7 AND CERTAIN INSTITUTIONS OF HIGHER 

8 EDUCATION. 

9 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 1 of title 9 of the United 

10 States Code (relating to the enforcement of arbitration 

11 agreements) shall not apply to an enrollment agreement 

12 made between a student and an institution of higher edu13 cation. 

14 (b) DEFINITION.—In this section, the term ‘‘institu15 tion of higher education’’ has the meaning given such term 

16 in section 102 of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 

17 U.S.C. 1002). 

18 SEC. 3. PROHIBITION ON LIMITATIONS ON ABILITY OF STU19 DENTS TO PURSUE CLAIMS AGAINST CER20 TAIN INSTITUTIONS OF HIGHER EDUCATION. 

21 Section 487(a) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 

22 (20 U.S.C. 1094(a)) is amended by adding at the end the 

23 following: 

24 ‘‘(30) The institution will not require any stu25 dent to agree to, and will not enforce, any limitation 

26 or restriction (including a limitation or restriction on 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 553 IS

1 any available choice of applicable law, a jury trial, 

2 or venue) on the ability of a student to pursue a 

3 claim, individually or with others, against an institu4 tion in court.’’. 

5 SEC. 4. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

6 This Act and the amendments made by this Act shall 

7 take effect 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Three-Five
Systems, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, Jack L. Saltich, President, Chief Executive Officer, and Director of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
78m(a) or 78o(d)); and  
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

| |                                                 
| | ------------------------------------------------
| | /s/ Jack L. Saltich                             
| |                                                 
| | Jack L. Saltich                                 
| | President, Chief Executive Officer, and Director

April 30, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Three-Five Systems, Inc. and will be retained by Three-Five
Systems, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
#### PEOPLE ex rel. DEEVY, Relator, v. GREENE et al., Appellants.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

November 6, 1903.)

Proceeding by the people, on the relation of Jefferson Deevy, against Francis V. Greene and others.

A. I. Elkus, for relator.

T. Farley, for appellants.

No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.
### §200510. Inapplicability of matching provisions

Amounts authorized for Guam, American Samoa, the Virgin Islands, and the Northern Mariana Islands are not subject to the matching provisions of this chapter, and may be subject only to such conditions, reports, plans, and agreements, if any, as the Secretary may determine.

(Pub. L. 113–287, §3, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3186.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 200510 | 16 U.S.C. 2512(a) (last paragraph). | Pub. L. 95–625, title X, §1013(a) (last paragraph), Nov. 10, 1978, 92 Stat. 3544; Pub. L. 98–454, title VI, §601(a), Oct. 5, 1984, 98 Stat. 1736; Pub. L. 103–322, title III, §31505(a), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 1889. |

Section

The text of 16 U.S.C. 2512(a) (last paragraph 1st sentence) is omitted as obsolete.
### §7471. Suspension or termination

#### (a) In general

If the Secretary finds that an order issued under section 7463 of this title, or a provision of the order, obstructs or does not tend to effectuate the purposes of this subchapter, the Secretary shall suspend or terminate the operation of the order or provision.

#### (b) Limitation

The suspension or termination of any order, or any provision of an order, shall not be considered an order under this subchapter.

(Pub. L. 104–127, title V, §562, Apr. 4, 1996, 110 Stat. 1074.)
### §7233. Term of loans

#### (a) Term of loan

In the case of each loan commodity (other than upland cotton or extra long staple cotton), a marketing assistance loan under section 7231 of this title shall have a term of 9 months beginning on the first day of the first month after the month in which the loan is made.

#### (b) Special rule for cotton

A marketing assistance loan for upland cotton or extra long staple cotton shall have a term of 10 months beginning on the first day of the month in which the loan is made.

#### (c) Extensions prohibited

The Secretary may not extend the term of a marketing assistance loan for any loan commodity.

(Pub. L. 104–127, title I, §133, Apr. 4, 1996, 110 Stat. 907.)
#### Henry Duplicki, Appellant, v. Melanie Duplicki, Respondent.

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. (Appeal from judgment of Erie Supreme Court dismissing the complaint on the merits, in an action for separation, and continuing the custody of the infant daughter of the parties.) Present —• Williams, P. J., Bastow, Goldman, McClusky and Henry, JJ.
#### Constantine Macricostas et al. *v.*Planning Commission of the City of Danbury et al.

*Lloyd Cutsumpas,*in support of the petition.

*Norman A. Buzaid*and *Robert H. Talarico,*in opposition.

Submitted September 16

decided October 2, 1974

The plaintiffs’ petition for certification for appeal from the Court of Common Pleas in Fairfield County is granted.
#### Eugene Weiss, Appellant, v. Lloyd M. Bauman et al., Defendants, and Simon M. Jaglom et al., Respondents.

Order entered on June 3, 1960, granting defendants-respondents’ motion, pursuant to subdivision 4 of rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice, to dismiss the complaint for insufficiency, *907unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondents. No opinion. Concur — Rabin, J. P., Valente, McNally, Steuer and Bastow, JJ.
### §4810. Permissive provisions

#### (a) Recordkeeping and reporting requirements; incidental and necessary terms and conditions

On the recommendation of the Board, and with the approval of the Secretary, an order may contain one or more of the following provisions:

(1) Each person purchasing a porcine animal from a producer for commercial use, and each importer, shall—

(A) maintain and make available for inspection such books and records as may be required by the order; and

(B) file reports at the time, in the manner, and having the content prescribed by the order,

including documentation of the State of origin of a purchased porcine animal or the place of origin of an imported porcine animal, pork, or pork product.

(2) A term or condition—

(A) incidental to, and not inconsistent with, the terms and conditions specified in this chapter; and

(B) necessary to effectuate the other provisions of such order.

#### (b) Availability of information to Secretary and Board; confidentiality; disclosure; issuance of general statement, statistical data, or name of violator of order

(1) Information referred to in subsection (a)(1) shall be made available to the Secretary and the Board as is appropriate or necessary for the effectuation, administration, or enforcement of this chapter or an order.

(2)(A) Except as provided in subparagraphs (B) and (C), information obtained under subsection (a)(1) shall be kept confidential by officers or employees of the Department of Agriculture or the Board.

(B) Such information may be disclosed only—

(i) in a suit or administrative hearing involving the order with respect to which the information was furnished or acquired—

(I) brought at the direction or on the request of the Secretary; or

(II) to which the Secretary or an officer of the United States is a party; and

(ii) if the Secretary considers such information to be relevant to such suit or hearing.

(C) Nothing in this section prohibits—

(i) the issuance of a general statement based on the reports of a number of persons subject to an order, or statistical data collected therefrom, if such statement or data does not identify the information furnished by any person; or

(ii) the publication, by direction of the Secretary, of the name of a person violating an order, together with a statement of the particular provisions of the order violated by such person.

#### (c) Penalty for willful violations

A person who willfully violates subsection (a)(1) or (b) shall, on conviction, be—

(1) subject to a fine of not more than $1,000 or imprisoned for not more than 1 year, or both; and

(2) if such person is an employee of the Department of Agriculture or the Board, removed from office.

(Pub. L. 99–198, title XVI, §1621, Dec. 23, 1985, 99 Stat. 1617.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Jan. 1, 1986, see section 1631 of Pub. L. 99–198, set out as a note under section 4801 of this title.
### §4511. Investigations; power to subpena and take oaths and affirmations; aid of courts

The Secretary may make such investigations as the Secretary deems necessary for the effective administration of this subchapter or to determine whether any person subject to the provisions of this subchapter has engaged or is about to engage in any act that constitutes or will constitute a violation of any provision of this subchapter or of any order, or rule or regulation issued under this subchapter. For the purpose of such investigation, the Secretary may administer oaths and affirmations, subpena witnesses, compel their attendance, take evidence, and require the production of any records that are relevant to the inquiry. Such attendance of witnesses and the production of any such records may be required from any place in the United States. In case of contumacy by, or refusal to obey a subpena to, any person, the Secretary may invoke the aid of any court of the United States within the jurisdiction of which such investigation or proceeding is carried on, or where such person resides or carries on business, in requiring the attendance and testimony of witnesses and the production of records. The court may issue an order requiring such person to appear before the Secretary to produce records or to give testimony touching the matter under investigation. Any failure to obey such order of the court may be punished by such court as a contempt thereof. Process in any such case may be served in the judicial district in which such person is an inhabitant or wherever such person may be found.

(Pub. L. 98–180, title I, §120, Nov. 29, 1983, 97 Stat. 1143.)
### §381. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was from act Mar. 2, 1901, ch. 805, 31 Stat. 935, the Agricultural Appropriation Act, 1902, and authorized the Secretary of Agriculture to employ personnel and to incur administrative expenses in carrying out the objects of the agricultural experiment station program. See section 361g of this title. Similar provisions were contained in several prior appropriation acts.
Docket no. FAA-2015-1462

Why granting the exemption would be in the public interest:

Regulated aviation activity is in the public interest. The exemption requested by KFG 

Enterprises, LLC would allow for aerial operations pursuant to existing FAA regulations. The 

rules, policies, and procedures contained in our petition for exemption, create a safe and highly 

structured process by which aerial operations may take place. Granting our requested 

exemptions will give the public safe and professional access to all aspects of the products and 

services provided by the UAS system. 

In the past, the public had access to aerial operations only through the use of conventional 

aircraft. Airplanes, helicopters, and other mechanical mechanisms which are larger and require 

liquid fuel create an inherently higher risk threat to the public, operators, and environment in 

the event of an accident or incident. 

All aspects of the UAS operations are covered in this document. In addition to all of KFG 

Enterprises, LLC pilots being rated pilots, our pilot qualifications far exceed the minimum 

currently required to operate the UAS. (i.e. Between our 4 pilots we have 2 dual rated airline 

transport pilots, 1 commercial pilot, 1 private pilot, 1 dual rated flight instructor, 2 certified A&P 

mechanics, and 1 hot air balloon operator) Our combined flight time exceeds 34,000 hours and 

all crew members understand and are thoroughly familiar with the National Airspace System, 

the Federal Aviation Administration Regulations, and are trained and qualified UAS operators. 

We all understand the importance of safety in the airway system with safety being our focal 

point. Granting KFG Enterprises, LLC the request for exemption would guarantee a higher level 

of safety and expertise given the training and experience we have in the aviation environment. 

Since our primary focus is safety, we strive to maintain this culture through our risk assessment 

and safety management system. Our pilots are UAS qualified and pilot training is conducted in 

house by a certified flight instructor familiar with UAS systems and operations. Flight 

operations will be conducted within the scope of exemption 333 and the Federal Aviation 

Regulation. Mission planning, site evaluation, crew briefing, site security, and pre and post 

flight inspections will ensure a level of safety equivalent or higher than that provided in current 

rules. Not only will the public benefit from the high level of safety, but our pilots and observers 

will benefit as well. 

Moreover, the requested use presents a compelling case for the administration moving forward 

with efforts to integrate UAS into the National Airspace System as required by Section 333. In 

addition, the applicant’s operational experience resulting from the use of UAS operations 

combined with their extensive aviation background, may be valuable to the administration in 

developing rules governing UAS.
C. A. No. 75-54.

#### State *v.*Bruce Leonardo.

*Julius C. Michaelson,*Attorney General, *Judith Romney Wegner,*Special Asst. Attorney General, for plaintiff. *William F. Reilly,*Public Defender, for defendant.

Motion of defendant for appointment of special counsel is denied. The Public Defender is directed to represent defendant in the further prosecution of his appeal.
#### STATE v. BROWN

No. 65A85-2

Case below: Robeson County. Superior Court

Petition by Attorney General for writ of certiorari to review the order of Superior Court, Robeson County denied 6 November 1997.
.\LG 

expect more 

July 7, 2015 

VIA FED EX ONLY (TRACKING #8062 8187 2423} 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Management System 

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

L: 

Re: Amendment to Exemption No. 11756 Issued to Fenestermaker Inc., Pursuant to 

Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 

Dear Sir or Madam: 

C.H. Fenestermaker & Associates, LLC ("Fenestermaker") was issued Exemption No. 11756 on 

June 5, 2015 (hereinafter "the Exemption") authorizing commercial operations, with conditions and 

limitations, for a DJI Innovations S800 UAS for the purpose aerial data collection to include precision 

aerial surveying and mapping. 

Fenestermaker now requests an amendment to the Exemption allowing it to operate additional 

sUAS pursuant to the same conditions and limitations contained in the Exemption. The additional 

aircraft for which relief from 14 CFR Part 21, Certification procedures for Products and Parts, Subpart HAirworthiness Certificates and additional FAR's as contained in the original Exemption will be required 

and which Fenestermaker requests be included in its exemption are : 1) DJI Inspiration 1; 2) Phantom 2 

Vision, and 3) X-UAV Talon FPV. These additional aircraft fall within the limitations prescribed in the 

exemption for weight, size, and performance. Aircraft operating and maintenance manuals for these 

aircraft are attached to this amendment request. The FAA has previously granted exemptions for these 

aircraft. 

Fenestermaker has revised its sUAS Operators Handbook to include the additional aircraft 

requested to be added to the Exemption. A copy of the revised Operator's Handbook is attached. The 

Operator's Handbook and Operations Manuals contain confidential commercial and/or proprietary 

information to Fenestermaker and are not generally available to the public and are protected from 

release under the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. §552 et seq. 

Fenestermaker respectfully submits that this amendment qualifies for summary grant approval. 

The FAA has previously granted exemptions for the operation of the additional aircraft requested in this 

amendment. Similarly, as the proposed operations of these additional aircraft will be in full 

conformance with the other conditions and limitations of the Exemption, there is no need for the FAA to 

repeat the analysis performed for the original exemption on which this amendment is based. For the 

same reasons, good cause exists to preclude the requirement to publish the requested amendment in 

the Federal Register. 

ALGATTORNEYS. PLLC 

(720) 530 4600 

(720) 530 iHl01 ALGA TTORNEYS.COM 
Please feel free to contact me if there are any questions or any additional information needed to 

process this amendment to include these other aircraft on Exemption 11756. 

Sincerely, 

Encls:- Fenstermaker sUAS Operator's Handbook (CONFIDENTIAL- NOT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE) 

Fenstermaker sUAS Operator's Handbook (CONFIDENTIAL- NOT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE) 

Fenstermaker Fixed-wing sUAS Operator's Handbook (CONFIDENTIAL- NOT FOR PUBLIC 

RELEASE) 

LJ.S. ~ 8, 5 ···--------·-··· . 

?