alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                          0000032284
<NAME>                                         Orion Diversified Technologies

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              APR-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 MAY-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUL-31-1997
<CASH>                                              0
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    0
<PP&E>                                              0
<DEPRECIATION>                                      0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         129,112
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                       18,469
<OTHER-SE>                                   (147,581)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        0
<SALES>                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    0
<CGS>                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              104,381
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                33,084
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 0
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                   33,084
<EPS-BASIC>                                       .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .02



</TABLE>
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23

- 7207

SHARON R. WAZNEY , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. ROBERT WILLIAM WAZNEY , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Columbia

. Joseph Dawson, III , District Judge. ( 3:23

- cv - 03497

- JD )

Submitted : March 2 8 , 2024 Decided: April 2, 2024

Before KING and RUSHING , Circuit Judges , and MOTZ, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Robert William Wazney , Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 23-7207 Doc: 11 Filed: 04/02/2024 Pg: 1 of 32 PER CURIAM: Robert William Wazney seeks to appeal the district court’s order adopting with
modification the recommendation of the magistrate judge, denying his motion to proceed in forma pauperis, and remanding the underlying proceeding back to state court after determining it lacked subject matter jurisdiction. We dismiss the appeal. Section 1447(d) of Title 28 of the United States Code places “broad restrictions,” Things Remembered, Inc. v. Petrarca , 516 U.S. 124 , 127 (1995), on the jurisdiction of courts of appeals to review remand orders. Generally, “[a]n order remanding a case to the State court from which it was removed is not reviewable on appeal or otherwise .”
28 U.S.C. § 1447(d). The Supreme Court has instructed that “§ 1447(d) must be read in pari materia with [28 U.S.C.] § 1447(c), so that only remands based on grounds spe cified in § 1447(c) are immune from review under § 1447(d).” Things Remembered , 516 U.S. at 127. Thus, § 1447(d) bars appellate court review of remand orders when they are based on “(1) a district court’s lack of subject matter jurisdiction or (2) a defect in removal other than lack of subject matter jurisdiction that was raised by the motion of a party within 30 days after the notice of removal was filed .” Ellenburg v. Spartan Motors Chassis, Inc. , 519 F.3d 192, 196 (4th Cir. 2008) (internal quotation m arks omitted). Taking the requisite “brief peek” at the district court’s reasoning, we are satisfied
that “ a lack of subject

- matter jurisdiction was a colorable or plausible explanation of the legal ground on which the [district] court actually relied for remand .” Protopapas v.
Travelers Cas. & Sur. Co. , ___ F.4th ___, No. 23

- 1339, 2024 WL 764144 , at *4 (4th Cir. USCA4 Appeal: 23-7207 Doc: 11 Filed: 04/02/2024 Pg: 2 of 33 Feb. 26, 2024). Accordingly, we lack jurisdiction to review the district court’s remand order under § 1447(d) and thus dismiss this appeal. Id. at *7. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED USCA4 Appeal: 23-7207 Doc: 11 Filed: 04/02/2024 Pg: 3 of 3
#### § 89.1 Purpose.

In accordance with the sense of Congress as set forth in section 539 of Public Law 111-84, this part establishes policy, assigns responsibilities, and provides procedures to implement the Interstate Compact on Educational Opportunity for Military Children (referred to in this part as the “Compact”) within the DoD.
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 251 (Thursday, December 31, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 86996-86997]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-28989]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS

[OMB Control No. 2900-0212]


Agency Information Collection Activity Under OMB Review: Veterans 
Mortgage Life Insurance Statement

AGENCY: Veterans Benefits Administration, Department of Veterans 
Affairs.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) of 1995, 
this notice announces that the Veterans Benefits Administration, 
Department of Veterans Affairs, will submit the collection of 
information abstracted below to the Office of Management and Budget 
(OMB) for review and comment. The PRA submission describes the nature 
of the information collection and its expected cost and burden and it 
includes the actual data collection instrument.

DATES: Written comments and recommendations for the proposed 
information collection should be sent within 30 days of the publication 
of this notice to www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain. Find this 
particular information collection by selecting

[[Page 86997]]

``Currently Under 30-day Review--Open for Public Comments'' or by using 
the search function. Refer to ``OMB Control No. 2900-0212''.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Danny S. Green, Enterprise Records 
Service (005R1B), Department of Veterans Affairs, 811 Vermont Avenue 
NW, Washington, DC 20420, (202) 421-1354 or email <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#492d28272730672e3b2c2c277b093f28672e263f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="dfbbbeb1b1a6f1b8adbabab1ed9fa9bef1b8b0a9">[email protected]</span></a>. 
Please refer to ``OMB Control No. 2900-0212'' in any correspondence.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Authority: Public Law 104-13; 44 U.S.C. 3501-3521.
    Title: Veterans Mortgage Life Insurance Statement, VA Form 29-8636.
    OMB Control Number: 2900-0212.
    Type of Review: Reinstatement of a previously approved collection.
    Abstract: This form is used by veterans who have Specially Adapted 
Housing Grants to decline VMLI. The information on the form is required 
by law, 38 U.S.C. Section 806. Federal Register Notice with a 60-day 
comment period soliciting comments on this collection of information 
was published at 85 FR 206 on October 23, 2020, page 67609.
    Affected Public: Individuals and Households.
    Estimated Annual Burden: 250 hrs.
    Estimated Average Burden per Respondent: 15 minutes.
    Frequency of Response: One time.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 1,000.

    By direction of the Secretary.
Danny S. Green,
VA PRA Clearance Officer, Office of Quality, Performance and Risk, 
Department of Veterans Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2020-28989 Filed 12-30-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
§ 634.26 Traffic law enforcement principles. ( a ) Traffic law enforcement should motivate drivers to operate vehicles safely within traffic laws and regulations and maintain an effective and efficient flow of traffic. Effective enforcement should emphasize voluntary compliance by drivers and can be achieved by the following actions: ( 1 ) Publishing a realistic traffic code well known by all personnel.
( 2 ) Adopting standard signs, markings, and signals in accordance with NHSPS and the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways.
( 3 ) Ensuring enforcement personnel establish courteous, personal contact with drivers and act promptly when driving behavior is improper or a defective vehicle is observed in operation.
( 4 ) Maintaining an aggressive program to detect and apprehend persons who drive while privileges are suspended or revoked.
( 5 ) Using sound discretion and judgment in deciding when to apprehend, issue citations, or warn the offender.
( b ) Selective enforcement will be used when practical. Selective enforcement deters traffic violations and reduces accidents by the presence or suggested presence of law enforcement personnel at places where violations, congestion, or accidents frequently occur. Selective enforcement applies proper enforcement measures to traffic congestion and focuses on selected time periods, conditions, and violations that cause accidents. Law enforcement personnel use selective enforcement because that practice is the most effective use of resources.
( c ) Enforcement activities against intoxicated driving will include— ( 1 ) Detecting, apprehending, and testing persons suspected of driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs.
( 2 ) Training law enforcement personnel in special enforcement techniques.
( 3 ) Enforcing blood-alcohol concentration standards. (See § 634.34).
( 4 ) Denying installation driving privileges to persons whose use of alcohol or other drugs prevents safe operation of a motor vehicle.
( d ) Installation officials will formally evaluate traffic enforcement on a regular basis. That evaluation will examine procedures to determine if the following elements of the program are effective in reducing traffic accidents and deaths: ( 1 ) Selective enforcement measures;
( 2 ) Suspension and revocation actions; and
( 3 ) Chemical breath-testing programs.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1
 ENNIS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10Q
FOR THE PERIOD ENDED AUGUST 31, 2006
 SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
  (1)
    
    The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended
August 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the
Report.
 /s/ Keith S. WaltersKeith S. WaltersChairman of the Board andChief Executive OfficerDate: September 29, 2006
 The foregoing Certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350; it is not
being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date
hereof, regardless of any general incorporation languages in such filing.
1001.105-2 Arrangement of regulations. ( a ) *References and citations.* The DTAR is divided into the same parts, subparts, sections, subsections, and paragraphs as the FAR except that 10 or 100 will precede the DTAR citation so that there are four numbers to the left of the first decimal. Reference to DTAR material must be made in a manner similar to that prescribed by FAR 1.105-2(c).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                          5
<MULTIPLIER>                       1,000

<S>                                <C>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  MAY-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                     JUN-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                       AUG-31-1999
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      3-MOS
<CASH>                                             444
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   46,500
<ALLOWANCES>                                     6,035
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    0
<PP&E>                                         503,939
<DEPRECIATION>                                 257,044
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 354,189
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               0
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                        10,587
<OTHER-SE>                                          0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   354,189
<SALES>                                         10,213
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                62,753
<CGS>                                            8,672
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   50,641
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,687
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 10,425
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,961
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,464
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,464
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.26
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.26


</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Raymond Nehru Ali, Appellant, v H. T. Sperbeck, as Acting Deputy Superintendent of the Green Haven Correctional Facility, Respondent.

In a habeas corpus proceeding, petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, dated November 3, 1976, which dismissed the proceeding. Appeal dismissed, without costs or disbursements. The petitioner’s liberty is no longer being restrained in view of his release on parole. Accordingly, he is not entitled to a writ of habeas corpus (see CPLR 7002, subd [a]; *People ex rel. Yacobellis v McKendrick,*28 NY2d 808; *People ex rel. Wilder v Markley,*26 NY2d 648; *People ex rel. Butts v McMann,*24 NY2d 772; *People ex rel. Jones v Ternullo,*52 AD2d 631; *People ex rel. Christian v Vincent,*49 AD2d 914). Hopkins, J. P., Damiani, Gulotta and Hawkins, JJ., concur.
#### W. C. LOFTUS & CO., Respondent, v. BENNETT, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

October 23, 1903.)

Action by W. C. Loftus & Co. against James G. Bennett.

R. W. Candler, for appellant.

D. McClure, for respondent.

No opinion. Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.
EX-4.2 STOCK OPTION PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2



 








Exhibit 4.2




MONRO MUFFLER BRAKE, INC.

1998 STOCK OPTION PLAN

AMENDMENT No. 2




dated as of August 9, 2005




     WHEREAS, Monro Muffler Brake, Inc. (the “Company”) maintains the Monro Muffler Brake, Inc.
1998 Stock Option Plan (the “Plan”) to encourage and enable all eligible employees of the Company
and its subsidiaries to acquire a proprietary interest in the Company through ownership of the
Company’s common stock;



     WHEREAS, pursuant to Article 9 of the Plan, the Board of Directors of Monro Muffler Brake,
Inc. (the “Board”) may amend the Plan provided that any amendment that would (i) materially
increase the aggregate number of shares which may be issued under the Plan, (ii) materially
increase the benefits accruing to employees under the Plan, or (iii) materially modify the
requirements as to eligibility for participation in the Plan, shall be subject to the approval of
the Company’s stockholders; and



     WHEREAS, the Board desires to amend the Plan to increase the aggregate number of shares of
Common Stock that may be issued under the Plan from 1,425,000
(formerly 950,000, retroactively adjusted for the three-for-two stock
split effective October 31, 2003) to 1,785,000.



     NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to and in exercise of the authority retained by the Board under
Article 9 of the Plan, subject to ratification by the stockholders of the Company, the Plan is
hereby amended, effective August 9, 2005, to provide as follows:


1. The first sentence of Section 2.2 of the Plan is hereby amended by deleting “950,000” and
inserting “1,785,000” in its place.



2. The Plan, except as otherwise set forth herein, shall remain in full force and effect in all
other respects.




Date approved by



Board of Directors — June 8, 2005

Shareholders — August 9, 2005




III-1
### §2139. Principal-agent relationship established

When construing or enforcing the provisions of this chapter, the act, omission, or failure of any person acting for or employed by a research facility, a dealer, or an exhibitor or a person licensed as a dealer or an exhibitor pursuant to the second sentence of section 2133 of this title, or an operator of an auction sale subject to section 2142 of this title, or an intermediate handler, or a carrier, within the scope of his employment or office, shall be deemed the act, omission, or failure of such research facility, dealer, exhibitor, licensee, operator of an auction sale, intermediate handler, or carrier, as well as of such person.

(Pub. L. 89–544, §9, Aug. 24, 1966, 80 Stat. 351; Pub. L. 91–579, §10, Dec. 24, 1970, 84 Stat. 1562; Pub. L. 94–279, §7, Apr. 22, 1976, 90 Stat. 418.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1976—Pub. L. 94–279 inserted "or an intermediate handler, or a carrier," after "section 2142 of this title," and substituted "operator of an auction sale, intermediate handler, or carrier, as well as of such person." for "or an operator of an auction sale as well as of such person." after "research facility, dealer, exhibitor, licensee,".

1970—Pub. L. 91–579 inserted references to persons acting for or employed by exhibitors, persons licensed as exhibitors, and operators of auction sales subject to section 2142 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1970 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 91–579 effective one year after Dec. 24, 1970, see section 23 of Pub. L. 91–579, set out as a note under section 2131 of this title.
§ 770.19 Entry procedures. ( a ) Any person or group of persons desiring the advance consent of the Commanding Officer, SUBASE Bangor or his authorized representative shall, in writing, submit a request to the Commanding Officer, Naval Submarine Base, Bangor, 1100 Hunley Road, Silverdale, WA 98315.
( b ) Each request for entry will be considered on an individual basis weighing the operational, security, and safety requirements of SUBASE Bangor with the purpose, size of party, duration of visit, destination, and military resources which would be required by the granting of the request.
[44 FR 32368, June 6, 1979, as amended at 65 FR 53592, Sept. 5, 2000]
Federal Aviation Administration – Regulations and Policies

Aviation Rulemaking Advisory Committee 

Transport Airplane and Engine Issue Area 

Cargo Standards Harmonization Working Group 

Task 1 – Main Deck Class B Cargo Compartments 
Task Assignment 

Recommendation Letter 

Acknowledgement Letter 

Recommendation
#### Martha Welliver, appellee, v. A. F. Cashmore, appellant.

Gen. No. 7,409.

Action for breach of contract. Judgment for plaintiff. Appeal from the Circuit Court of McHenry county; the Hon. E. D. Shurt*658lefE, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1924.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed March 27, 1925.

J. F. Oasey, for appellant. V. S. Lumley, for appellee.

Mr. Presiding Justice

Jett delivered the opinion of the court.
Exhibit 21

List of Subsidiaries

Subsidiaries of International Bancshares Corporation

|Name                       |  | Business              |  | % of Ownership
|-------------------------- |  | --------------------- |  | --------------
|IBC Subsidiary Corporation |  | Bank Holding Company  |  | 100%          
|IBC Life Insurance Company |  | Credit Life Insurance |  | 100%          
|IBC Trading Company        |  | Export Trading        |  | 100%          
|IBC Capital Corporation    |  | Investments           |  | 100%          

Subsidiaries
of IBC Subsidiary Corporation

|Name                                        |  | Business                        |  | % of Ownership
|------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------- |  | --------------
|International Bank of Commerce              |  | State Bank                      |  | 100%          
|Commerce Bank                               |  | State Bank                      |  | 100%          
|International Bank of Commerce, Zapata      |  | State Bank                      |  | 100%          
|International Bank of Commerce, Brownsville |  | State Bank                      |  | 100%          
|Gulfstar Group I, Ltd.                      |  | Investment and Merchant Banking |  | 70%           
|Gulfstar Group II, Ltd.                     |  | Investment Banking              |  | 70%           
|Gulfstar Merchant Banking II, Ltd.          |  | Merchant Banking                |  | 70%           

---



QuickLinks
### §4506. Requirement of referendum

(a) Within the sixty-day period immediately preceding September 30, 1985, the Secretary shall conduct a referendum among producers who, during a representative period (as determined by the Secretary), have been engaged in the production of milk for commercial use for the purpose of ascertaining whether the order then in effect shall be continued. Such order shall be continued only if the Secretary determines that it has been approved by not less than a majority of the producers voting in the referendum, who during a representative period (as determined by the Secretary) have been engaged in the production of milk for commercial use. If continuation of the order is not approved by a majority of the producers voting in the referendum, the Secretary shall terminate collection of assessments under the order within six months after the Secretary determines that such action is favored by a majority of the producers voting in the referendum and shall terminate the order in an orderly manner as soon as practicable after such determination.

(b) The Secretary shall be reimbursed from assessments collected by the Board for any expenses incurred by the Department in connection with the conduct of any referendum under this section and section 4507 of this title, except for the salaries of Government employees.

(Pub. L. 98–180, title I, §115, Nov. 29, 1983, 97 Stat. 1141.)