Fiscal Year 2003 Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies - MARYLAND

Maximum Required

Expenditures For 

Choice-Related Maximum Per-Child

Transportation Expenditure For

FY 2003 Title I And Supplemental Supplemental

LEA ID District Allocation* Educational Services** Educational Services***

2400030 ALLEGANY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 3,052,983 610,597 1,675.62

2400060 ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 8,766,279 1,753,256 1,495.19

2400090 BALTIMORE CITY PUBLIC SCHOOL SYSTEM 52,356,464 10,471,293 1,973.85

2400120 BALTIMORE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 16,268,400 3,253,680 1,608.03

2400150 CALVERT COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1,332,385 266,477 1,219.02

2400180 CAROLINE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1,147,023 229,405 1,392.02

2400210 CARROLL COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1,818,953 363,791 1,148.33

2400240 CECIL COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2,018,320 403,664 1,248.96

2400270 CHARLES COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2,590,286 518,057 1,232.88

2400300 DORCHESTER COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1,356,847 271,369 1,422.27

2400330 FREDERICK COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2,747,510 549,502 1,246.60

2400360 GARRETT COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1,527,361 305,472 1,594.32

2400390 HARFORD COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 3,641,270 728,254 1,315.01

2400420 HOWARD COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1,996,925 399,385 874.69

2400450 KENT COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 546,283 109,257 1,250.08

2400480 MONTGOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 15,190,338 3,038,068 1,543.26

2400510 PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOL 22,325,812 4,465,162 1,588.69

2400540 QUEEN ANNES COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 719,250 143,850 1,150.80

2400570 SOMERSET COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1,105,703 221,141 1,417.57

2400600 ST. MARYS COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2,145,377 429,075 1,348.45

2400630 TALBOT COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 833,370 166,674 1,359.49

2400660 WASHINGTON COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2,955,539 591,108 1,210.29

2400690 WICOMICO COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 3,178,545 635,709 1,407.68

2400720 WORCESTER COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1,560,728 312,146 1,369.06

2499999 PART D SUBPART 2 1,019,554 203,911 0.00

* Actual amounts received by LEAs will be smaller than shown here due to State-level adjustments to Federal Title I allocations. States adjust

 allocations, for example, to reflect LEA boundary changes or the creation of new LEAs, including charter school LEAs, that are not accounted

 for in the Department's calculations. States also are permitted to reserve up to 1 percent of allocations for administration and must reserve

 2 percent of allocations (rising to 4 percent in fiscal year 2004) for school improvement activities. These adjustments will reduce the actual

 amounts available under all three columns of the table.

** An LEA must use up to an amount equal to 20 percent of its Title I, Part A allocation (the “20-percent reservation”) received from the State 

 to cover choice-related transportation costs for students who exercise a choice option and to pay for supplemental educational services for

 students whose parents request such services. The 20-percent reservation may include Title I, Part A funds or funding from other Federal,

 State, local, and private sources. The amount shown in this column is the Department’s estimate of the amount that affected LEAs - those

 with schools identifed for improvement, corrective action, or restructuring - may have to spend to meet this requirement. Actual 

 expenditures will depend on such factors as the number of students exercising either a choice option or supplemental educuational services and

 the costs of satisfying these requests. An LEA has discretion to determine the allocation of these funds between choice-related transportation

 and supplemental educational services, except that it must spend at least one-quarter of the 20-percent reservation - or an amount equal to

 5 percent of its Title I, Part A allocation - on each activity if there is demand for both from students and their parents.

*** An LEA that must arrange for supplemental educational services is required to pay, for each child receiving services, the lesser of the actual cost

 of the services or an amount equal to the LEA’s Title I, Part A allocation received from the State divided by the number of poor students in the

 LEA, as determined by estimates produced by the US Bureau of the Census. Thus the amount shown in this column reflects the statutory “cap”

 on per-child expenditures for supplemental educational services.