alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### David R. Forgan et al., plaintiffs in error, v. William H. Leithner et al., defendants in error.

Gen. No. 7,400.

Suit on promissory notes. Judgment for defendants. Error to the Circuit Court of Rock Island county; the Hon. Charles J. Searle, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1924.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed March 27, 1925.

Connelly, Weld, Walker & Searle, for plaintiffs in error.

Joseph P. Kelly and Harry M. McCaskrin, for defendants in error.

Mr. Presiding Justice Jett

delivered the opinion of the court.
Subject: Conference Call with Portland Cement Association – Startup and Shutdown

Location: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC

Date: November 14, 2012

Participants:

Portland Cement Association

John Holmes

RTI International

Mike Laney

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)

Keith Barnett

Sharon Nizich

John Holmes of PCA was contacted for clarification of procedures associated with startup and 

shutdown.
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

**____________** No. 22

- 50545 Summary Calendar

**____________ United States of America,**  Plaintiff

— Appellee **,**
versus **Antonio Castaneda,** Defendant

— Appellant

**.**

**______________________________** Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 7:22

- CR

- 21

- 1

**______________________________** Before **Wiener, Elrod,** and **Engelhardt,** Circuit Judges

**. Per Curiam**  **:** ***** The attorney appointed to represent Defendant

- Appellant Antonio Castaneda has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Castaneda has not filed a response.

**_____________________**

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See **5th Cir . R.**  47.5. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED March 24, 2023 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 22-50545 Document: 00516688604 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/24/2023No. 22

- 50545

2 We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. C ounsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is **GRANTED** , counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is **DISMISSED**

. See **5th Cir. R.** 42.2
. Case: 22-50545 Document: 00516688604 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/24/2023
### §6006. Permissive terms in plans

#### (a) In general

A plan issued pursuant to this chapter may contain one or more of the terms and conditions contained in this section.

#### (b) Exemptions

The plan may provide authority to exempt from the plan pecans used for nonfood uses and authority for the Board to require satisfactory safeguards against improper uses of such exemptions.

#### (c) Different payment and reporting schedules

The plan may provide authority to designate different payment and reporting schedules for growers, grower-shellers, first handlers and importers to recognize differences in marketing practices and procedures utilized in different production areas.

#### (d) Promotion

The plan may provide for the establishment, issuance, effectuation, and administration of appropriate programs or projects for the promotion of pecans and for the disbursement of necessary funds for such purposes, except that—

(1) any such program or project shall be directed toward increasing the general demand for pecans; and

(2) such promotional activities shall comply with other restrictions on the use of funds that are established under this chapter.

#### (e) Research and information

The plan may provide for establishing and carrying on research, consumer information, and industry information projects and studies to the end that the marketing and utilization of pecans may be encouraged, expanded, improved, or made more efficient, and for the disbursement of necessary funds for such purposes.

#### (f) Reserve funds

The plan may provide authority to accumulate reserve funds from assessments collected pursuant to this chapter, to permit an effective and continuous coordinated program of research, consumer information, industry information and promotion in years when the production and assessment income may be reduced, except that the total reserve fund may not exceed the amount budgeted for the operation of the plan for 2 years.

#### (g) Foreign markets

The plan may provide authority to use funds collected under this chapter, with the approval of the Secretary, for the development and expansion of pecan sales in foreign markets.

(Pub. L. 101–624, title XIX, §1911, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 3847.)
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000030841
<NAME>                        DYNATECH CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                                 OCT-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1995
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1.000
<CASH>                                         34,427
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  85,705
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (3,965)
<INVENTORY>                                    55,612
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               19,658
<PP&E>                                         93,352
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (61,042)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 266,242
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          77,998
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       3,721
<OTHER-SE>                                     168,400
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   266,242
<SALES>                                        359,055
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               359,055
<CGS>                                          162,815
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  185,971
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (1,052)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (107)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                11,428
<INCOME-TAX>                                   4,636
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            6,792
<DISCONTINUED>                                 647
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   7,439
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.041
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.041
        


</TABLE>
### §7622. Repealed. Pub. L. 110–234, title VII, §7302, May 22, 2008, 122 Stat. 1242, and Pub. L. 110–246, §4(a), title VII, §7302, June 18, 2008, 122 Stat. 1664, 2003

Section, Pub. L. 105–185, title IV, §402, June 23, 1998, 112 Stat. 566; Pub. L. 107–171, title VII, §7123, May 13, 2002, 116 Stat. 434, related to partnerships for high-value agricultural product quality research.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Pub. L. 110–234 and Pub. L. 110–246 repealed this section. Pub. L. 110–234 was repealed by section 4(a) of Pub. L. 110–246.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal of this section and repeal of Pub. L. 110–234 by Pub. L. 110–246 effective May 22, 2008, the date of enactment of Pub. L. 110–234, except as otherwise provided, see section 4 of Pub. L. 110–246, set out as an Effective Date note under section 8701 of this title.
#### The People of the State of New York, Plaintiff, v. Gerald H. Rogers, Defendant.

Time within which to perfect appeal extended for 60 days. Motion to dismiss appeal granted, unless appellant perfects appeal, files note of issue, and files and serves record and brief on or before February 15, 1961 and is ready for argument at the March Term of this court, in which event the motion is denied.
# State-by-State

Undistributed (Non-State Allocations)

Indian Set-Aside

Freely Associated States

Virgin Islands

Puerto Rico

Northern Mariana Islands

Guam

American Samoa

Wyoming

Wisconsin

West Virginia

Washington

Virginia

Vermont

Texas

Tennessee

South Dakota

South Carolina

Rhode Island

Pennsylvania

Oregon

Oklahoma

Ohio

North Dakota

North Carolina

New York

New Mexico

New Jersey

New Hampshire

Nevada

Nebraska

Montana

Missouri

Mississippi

Minnesota

Michigan

Massachusetts

Maryland

Maine

Louisiana

Kentucky

Kansas

Iowa

Indiana

Illinois

Idaho

Hawaii

Georgia

Florida

District of Columbia

Delaware

Connecticut

Colorado

California

Arkansas

Arizona

Alaska

Alabama

Utah

GRAND TOTAL
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                            3731
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   177496
<ALLOWANCES>                                      1364
<INVENTORY>                                     179117
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                378317
<PP&E>                                          769091
<DEPRECIATION>                                  418690
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1009174
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           182961
<BONDS>                                         471761
<COMMON>                                         83465
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      113229
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1009174
<SALES>                                         411556
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                411556
<CGS>                                           319442
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   352072
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (2042)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               17626
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  43900
<INCOME-TAX>                                     15348
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              28552
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     28552
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .34
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .34


</TABLE>
§ 705.15 Employment of Navy personnel as correspondents or staff members of civilian news media. ( a ) A member of the naval service on active duty or Navy civilian may act as correspondent for a news periodical or service, radio or TV station or network, or may work part-time for such an organization. The Secretary of the Navy will, however, be immediately informed, via the Chief of Information. ( 1 ) See section 0307 (par. 5), section 0308 (par. 4), and section 0309 (par. 3) of the Navy Public Affairs Regulations for regulations referring to personnel assigned to public affairs staffs receiving compensation for such work.
( 2 ) In time of war, only personnel assigned to public affairs billets and such other personnel as the Secretary of the Navy may authorize can act as correspondents for civilian media.
( b ) Military personnel on active duty and Navy civilians may not serve on the staff of a “civilian enterprise” newspaper published for personnel of a Navy installation or activity.
#### Norman Zeiler v. Murray Ursaner et al.

Motion for an order enjoining the plaintiff from interfering with a title closing denied, with $10 costs. Concur—-Breitel, J. P., Rabin, Valente, McNally and Eager, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1994
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1995
<CASH>                                           3,535
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,829
<ALLOWANCES>                                        51
<INVENTORY>                                     10,035
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                63,864
<PP&E>                                          51,466
<DEPRECIATION>                                  27,459
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  89,739
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           22,881
<BONDS>                                         16,250
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           766
<OTHER-SE>                                      48,273
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    89,739
<SALES>                                         83,534
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                83,534
<CGS>                                           60,731
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   60,731
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   394
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,384
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 11,132
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,896
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,236
<DISCONTINUED>                                      82
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,318
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .96
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .93
        

</TABLE>
### §7997. Tracking of benefits

As soon as practicable after May 13, 2002, the Secretary shall establish procedures to track the benefits provided, directly or indirectly, to individuals and entities under titles I and II and the amendments made by those titles.

(Pub. L. 107–171, title I, §1614, May 13, 2002, 116 Stat. 222.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Titles I and II, referred to in text, mean titles I and II of Pub. L. 107–171, May 13, 2002, 116 Stat. 143. For complete classification of titles I and II of Pub. L. 107–171 to the Code, see Tables.
§ 536.50 Determination of damages—applicable law. ( a ) *The Federal Tort Claims Act.* The whole law of the place where the incident giving rise to the claim occurred, including choice of law rules, is applicable. Therefore, the law of the place of injury or death does not necessarily apply. Where there is a conflict between local law and an express provision of the FTCA, the latter governs.
( b ) *The Military Claims Act or National Guard Claims Act.* See subparts C and F of this part. The law set forth in § 536.80 applies only to claims accruing on or after September 1, 1995. The law of the place of the incident giving rise to the claim will apply to claims arising in the United States, its commonwealths, territories and possessions prior to September 1, 1995. The general principles of U.S. tort law will apply to property damage or loss claims arising outside the United States prior to September 1, 1995. Established principles of general maritime law will apply to injury or death claims arising outside the United States prior to September 1, 1995. See *Moragne* v. *States Marine Lines, Inc.*, 398 U.S. 375 (1970) and federal case law. Where general maritime law provides no guidance, the general principles of U.S. tort law will apply.
( c ) *The Foreign Claims Act.* See subpart J of this part. The law of the place of occurrence applies to the resolution of claims. However, the law of damages set forth in § 536.139 will serve as a guide.
( d ) *The Army Maritime Claims Settlement Act.* Maritime law applies.
( e ) *Damages not payable.* Under all subparts, property loss or damage refers to actual tangible property. Accordingly, consequential damages, including, but not limited to bail, interest (prejudgment or otherwise), or court costs are not payable. Costs of preparing, filing, and pursuing a claim, including expert witness fees, are not payable. The payment of punitive damages, that is, damages in addition to general and special damages that are otherwise payable, is prohibited. See DA Pam 27-162, paragraphs 2-56 and 3-4b.
( f ) *Source of attorney's fees.* Attorney's fees are taken from the settlement amount and not added thereto. They may not exceed 20 percent of the settlement amount under any subpart.
Note to § 536.50 :
For further discussion see DA Pam 27-162, paragraph 2-51.
Exhibit 32(a)



                                TXU GAS COMPANY
                      Certificate Pursuant to Section 906
                        of Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002
                              CERTIFICATION OF CEO


    The undersigned, M.S. Greene, Vice Chairman and Chief Executive of TXU
Gas Company (the "Company"), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:

    1.   The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March
         31, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of section
         13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

    2.   Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
         respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
         Company.

    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this instrument to be
executed this 14th day of May, 2004.





                               /s/ M.S. Greene
                               ------------------------------------------------
                               Name:    M.S. Greene
                               Title:   Vice Chairman and Chief Executive




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to TXU Gas Company and will be retained by TXU Gas Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
U. S. Department ofTransportation Docket Management System 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE Washington, DC 20590
27 December 2015
Re: Amendment to Exemption 13924 issued pursuantto Section 333 ofthe FAA Reform Act and Part 11 ofthe Federal Aviation Regulations in Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2014-1699.
Dear Sir or Madam;
Peninsular Aerial Services, LLC (hereinafter Peninsular) was issued an Exemption numbered 13924 (hereinafter the Exemption) for the purpose ofaerial surveying, inspection, monitoring, education, research, photography, and videography for real estate and wildlife forestry. Peninsular herby requests an amendmentto the Exemption to allow for the operation ofadditional types ofsmall-Unmanned Aircraft Systems (sUAS). Peninsular wishes to operate the following sUAS under the same terms and conditions contained in the Exemption.

DJI Phantom 3 DJI Inspire 1 Pro DJI S1000+ DJI S900

Attached is the Flight Operations Manual for each ofthe additional sUAS. All operations ofthese sUAS will be in full compliance with the terms and conditions of the Exemption.
As this is an amendment to an existing exemption requesting to operate additional yet similar sUAS, Peninsular respectfully submits that good cause exists sothat notice need not be published in the Federal Register for the requested amendment Please contactthe undersigned should you have any question concerning this request for an amendmentto the Exemption. Respectfully submitted,

# ~ Robert L. Buhrow COO, Peninsular Aerial Services LLC 2445 Pimlico Lane, Melbourne, FL 32934 peninsularaerial@gmail.com 321-426-8393 'l I**U.S.Depa~entofTransportation** Docket Management System 1200 New JerseyAve, SE Washington, DC 20590
22 December 2015
Re: Amendmentto Exemption 13924issued pursuantto Section 333 ofthe FAA Reform Act and Part 11 ofthe Federal Aviation Regulations in Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2014-1699.
Dear Sir or Madam;
PeninsularAerial Services, 

### LLC (hereinafter Peninsular

### l was issued an Exemption numbered 13924 (hereinafterthe Exemption) for the purpose ofaerial surveying, inspection, monitoring, education, research, photography, and videography for real estate and wildlife forestry. Peninsular herby requests an amendmentto the Exemption to allow for the operation ofadditional types ofsmall-Unmanned Aircraft Systems (sUAS). Peninsular wishes to operatethe following sUAS underthe same terms and conditions contained in the Exemption.

DJI Phantom 3 DJI Inspire 1 Pro DJI S1000+ DJI 5900

Attached is the Flight Operations Manual for each ofthe additional sUAS. All operations ofthese sUAS will be in 

### full compliance with the terms and conditions of the Exemption. As this is an amendmentto an existing exemption requesting to operate additional yet similar sUAS, Peninsular respectfully submitsthat good cause exists so that notice need not bepublished in the Federal Register for the requested amendment Please contactthe undersigned shouldyou have any question concerning this requestfor an amendmentto the Exemption.

Rob 

### L. u row COO, PeninsularAerial Services 

### LLC peninsularaerial@gmail.com 321-426-8393
Second Amendment to Letter Agreement



 Exhibit 10.1 
 SECOND AMENDMENT TO LETTER AGREEMENT 
 THIS SECOND AMENDMENT TO LETTER AGREEMENT (the
“Amendment”) is entered into effective the 1st day of April, 2006, by NOVT Corporation, a Florida
corporation (hereinafter referred to as the “Company”) and Subhash C. Sarda (hereinafter referred to as the “Executive”). The Company and Executive are hereinafter referred to collectively, as the “Parties.” 

W I T N E S S E T H: 
 WHEREAS, the Parties have entered into a Letter Agreement dated November 11, 2005, pursuant to which the date of Executive’s termination of employment with the Company was established as February 28, 2006 and pursuant
to which the Executive was entitled to receive certain payments and compensation from the Company; and 
 WHEREAS, the Letter
Agreement dated November 11, 2005 was amended effective March 1, 2006 (as amended, the “Letter Agreement”), to extend Executive’s termination date to March 31, 2006, and to specify Executive’s compensation and
benefits during such extended period of employment; and 
 WHEREAS, the Company desires to employ Executive during the period
beginning April 1, 2006 and ending May 31, 2006; 
 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises and mutual covenants
contained herein and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the Parties hereby agree as follows: 
 1. Termination of Employment: The terms of paragraph 1 of the Letter Agreement shall be altered and amended so that the Executive shall be employed by the Company during the period beginning April 1, 2006
and ending May 31, 2006, with all accompanying benefits of employment, including health insurance benefits, vacation and allowable personal time accrual for 2006, reimbursement of business expenses and base salary at an annual rate of $270,000,
to be paid on a bi-weekly basis through May 31, 2006. Nothing in the Letter Agreement shall preclude the Executive from pursuing other employment search activities, as long as such activity does not substantially interfere with the performance
of his duties as Chief Financial Officer of the Company. 
 2. All other and further terms and provisions of the Letter Agreement shall
remain in full force and effect. 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Second Amendment to Letter Agreement as of the date
indicated by their respective names. 
 Date: 
  

					
	 April 6, 2006
	 		 	 /s/ Subhash C. Sarda

		 		 	SUBHASH C. SARDA
		
		 	NOVT CORPORATION
	DATE:	 		 	
			
	 April 6, 2006
	 	By:	 	 /s/ John Quicke

		 	Name:	 	JOHN QUICKE
		 	Title:	 	PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER