Fiscal Year 2004 Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies - MARYLAND

Maximum Required

Expenditures For 

Choice-Related Maximum Per-Child

Transportation Expenditure For

FY 2004 Title I And Supplemental Supplemental

LEA ID District Allocation* Educational Services** Educational Services***

2400030 ALLEGANY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2,923,225 584,645 1,744.17

2400060 ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 9,217,894 1,843,579 1,663.88

2400090 BALTIMORE CITY PUBLIC SCHOOL SYSTEM 55,111,609 11,022,322 2,127.37

2400120 BALTIMORE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 18,367,688 3,673,538 1,894.55

2400150 CALVERT COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1,279,936 255,987 1,330.49

2400180 CAROLINE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1,239,654 247,931 1,465.31

2400210 CARROLL COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1,314,245 262,849 973.51

2400240 CECIL COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2,194,049 438,810 1,344.39

2400270 CHARLES COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2,549,153 509,831 1,366.11

2400300 DORCHESTER COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1,382,568 276,514 1,512.66

2400330 FREDERICK COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1,894,735 378,947 986.84

2400360 GARRETT COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1,464,491 292,898 1,611.10

2400390 HARFORD COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 3,530,623 706,125 1,403.83

2400420 HOWARD COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2,023,094 404,619 968.91

2400450 KENT COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 562,233 112,447 1,412.65

2400480 MONTGOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 17,805,701 3,561,140 1,820.62

2400510 PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOL 26,576,714 5,315,343 1,880.47

2400540 QUEEN ANNES COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 737,721 147,544 1,248.26

2400570 SOMERSET COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1,181,755 236,351 1,599.13

2400600 ST. MARYS COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2,088,628 417,726 1,332.03

2400630 TALBOT COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 799,888 159,978 1,475.81

2400660 WASHINGTON COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 3,288,618 657,724 1,396.44

2400690 WICOMICO COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 3,645,730 729,146 1,598.30

2400720 WORCESTER COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1,565,565 313,113 1,499.58

2499999 PART D SUBPART 2 993,016 198,603 0.00

* Actual amounts received by LEAs will be smaller than shown here due to State-level adjustments to Federal Title I allocations. States adjust

 allocations, for example, to reflect LEA boundary changes or the creation of new LEAs, including charter school LEAs, that are not accounted

 for in the Department's calculations. States also are permitted to reserve up to 1 percent of allocations for administration and generally must

 reserve 4 percent in fiscal year 2004 (up from 2 percent in previous years) for school improvement activities. These adjustments will reduce the

 actual amounts available under all three columns of the table.

** An LEA must use up to an amount equal to 20 percent of its Title I, Part A allocation (the “20-percent reservation”) received from the State 

 to cover choice-related transportation costs for students who exercise a choice option and to pay for supplemental educational services for

 students whose parents request such services. The 20-percent reservation may include Title I, Part A funds or funding from other Federal,

 State, local, and private sources. The amount shown in this column is the Department’s estimate of the amount that affected LEAs - those

 with schools identified for improvement, corrective action, or restructuring - may have to spend to meet this requirement. Actual 

 expenditures will depend on such factors as the number of students exercising a choice option or receiving supplemental educational services and

 the costs of satisfying these requests. An LEA has discretion to determine the allocation of these funds between choice-related transportation

 and supplemental educational services, except that it must spend at least one-quarter of the 20-percent reservation - or an amount equal to

 5 percent of its Title I, Part A allocation - on each activity if there is demand for both from students and their parents.

*** An LEA that must arrange for supplemental educational services is required to pay, for each child receiving services, the lesser of the actual cost

 of the services or an amount equal to the LEA’s Title I, Part A allocation received from the State divided by the number of poor students in the

 LEA, as determined by estimates produced by the US Bureau of the Census. Thus the amount shown in this column reflects the statutory “cap”

 on per-child expenditures for supplemental educational services.