alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §2112. Enforcement of orders; penalty for willful violation

(a) The several district courts of the United States are vested with jurisdiction specifically to enforce, and to prevent and restrain any person from violating any order or regulation made or issued pursuant to this chapter.

(b) Any handler who willfully violates any provision of any order issued by the Secretary under this chapter, or who willfully fails or refuses to collect or remit any assessment or fee duly required of him thereunder, shall be liable to a penalty of not more than $1,000 for each such offense which shall accrue to the United States and may be recovered in a civil suit brought by the United States.

(Pub. L. 89–502, §13, July 13, 1966, 80 Stat. 284.)
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT

TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 of Robert Half International
Inc. (the Form 10-K), I, M. Keith Waddell, Chief Financial Officer of Robert Half International Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.    The Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.    The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Robert Half International Inc.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Robert Half International Inc. and will be retained by Robert Half
International Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|                  |  |                                                                        
|----------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------
|February 22, 2007 |  | /s/ M. Keith Waddell                                                   
|                  |  | M. Keith Waddell Chief Financial Officer Robert Half International Inc.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATE OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
   (1)
    
    The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2006, which
this statement accompanies, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period
ended December 31, 2006 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of ElkCorp.
 Date:  February 8, 2007
    By
    /s/ Thomas D. KarolThomas D. KarolChief Executive Officer
### §185. Federally funded research and development centers

The Secretary, acting through the Under Secretary for Science and Technology, shall have the authority to establish or contract with 1 or more federally funded research and development centers to provide independent analysis of homeland security issues, or to carry out other responsibilities under this chapter, including coordinating and integrating both the extramural and intramural programs described in section 188 of this title.

(Pub. L. 107–296, title III, §305, Nov. 25, 2002, 116 Stat. 2168.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 107–296, Nov. 25, 2002, 116 Stat. 2135, known as the Homeland Security Act of 2002, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 101 of this title and Tables.
### **CHAPTER 115—AGRICULTURAL COMMODITY POLICY AND PROGRAMS**

Sec.
9001.
Definition of Secretary of Agriculture.

#### SUBCHAPTER I—COMMODITY POLICY

9011.
Definitions.
9012.
Base acres.
9013.
Payment yields.
9014.
Payment acres.
9015.
Producer election.
9016.
Price loss coverage.
9017.
Agriculture risk coverage.
9018.
Producer agreements.
9019.
Repealed.

#### SUBCHAPTER II—MARKETING LOANS

9031.
Availability of nonrecourse marketing assistance loans for loan commodities.
9032.
Loan rates for nonrecourse marketing assistance loans.
9033.
Term of loans.
9034.
Repayment of loans.
9035.
Loan deficiency payments.
9036.
Payments in lieu of loan deficiency payments for grazed acreage.
9037.
Special marketing loan provisions for upland cotton.
9038.
Special competitive provisions for extra long staple cotton.
9039.
Availability of recourse loans for high moisture feed grains and seed cotton.
9040.
Adjustments of loans.

#### SUBCHAPTER III—DAIRY

#### Part A—Dairy Margin Coverage

9051.
Definitions.
9052.
Calculation of average feed cost and actual dairy production margins.
9053.
Dairy margin coverage.
9054.
Participation of dairy operations in dairy margin coverage.
9055.
Production history of participating dairy operations.
9056.
Dairy margin coverage payments.
9057.
Premiums for dairy margin coverage.
9058.
Effect of failure to pay administrative fees or premiums.
9059.
Duration.
9060.
Administration and enforcement.

#### Part B—Milk Donation Program

9071.
Milk donation program.
9071a.
Dairy donation program.

#### SUBCHAPTER IV—SUPPLEMENTAL AGRICULTURAL DISASTER ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS

9081.
Supplemental agricultural disaster assistance.

#### SUBCHAPTER V—ADMINISTRATION

9091.
Administration generally.
9092.
Suspension of permanent price support authority.
9093.
Prevention of deceased individuals receiving payments under farm commodity programs.
9094.
Assignment of payments.
9095.
Tracking of benefits.
9096.
Signature authority.
9097.
Implementation.
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N

NO. 03-14-00799- CV

William Wiese , Appellan t

v. F adya AlBak ry, Appellee

F ROM TH E DISTRI CT COURT O F TRAVIS CO UNTY, 53RD J UDICIAL DI STRICT NO. D-1 -F M- 04- 0079 64, H ONO RAB LE LO RA J. LI VINGSTO N, JUDGE P RESIDING

O R D E R
P ER CURIAM

Appellant and appellee , pare nts to J .W and C.W ., wer e divorce d in April 2005. On September 19, 2014, the trial court s i gn ed a final order modify ing the pare nt-child rela tionship, lifting the orig inal divorce decr ee’ s restric tions on international trave l with the children. Appellant, who curr ently has the exclusive rig ht to desig nate the children’ s primary residenc e, filed a notice of appea l. Appellant also filed an emer g ency motion to stay the Sept em b er 1 9 o rder to the extent it now per mits i nterna tional travel. Appe llee filed a response to the emer g ency motion. Ba sed on the arg uments prese nted by the parties and the record befor e us, we
co n cl u de that a st ay is war rante d pursuant to rule 24.2 of t he Tex as R ules of Appellate Procedur e and section 109.002(c) of the Texas Family Code. See Tex. R. App. P. 2 4
. 2 (a )( 4 ); see also Tex. Fam. Code § 109.002(c)
. Acc ording ly , in order to maintain the status quo of the parties during thependenc y

of this appea l, we gra

nt appellant’ s emer g ency motion. We here by stay the trial cour

t’s September 19 modification order to the extent it permits any international trave l w ith the children, pending final re solution of this appea l or furthe r orde r of this Court.

I t is so ordered Ma

rch 20, 2015.

Be fore J ustices Pury ear , Goodwin, and F ield

2
# A

Adult_Education_State_Grants

Chapter_2_State_and_Local_Programs

Consumer_and_Homemaking_Education

ESEA_Title_I__Grants_to_Local_Educational_Agencies

Federal_Pell_Grants

Federal_Perkins_Loans__Capital_Contributions

Federal_Supplemental_Educational_Opportunity_Grants

Federal_Work_Study

Grand_Total

Immigrant_Education

Impact_Aid__Basic_Support_Payments

Indian_Education__Grants_to_Local_Educational_Agencies

Leveraging_Educational_Assistance_Partnership

Special_Education__Grants_to_States

Special_Education__Preschool_Grants

Vocational_Education_State_Councils

Vocational_Education_State_Grants

Vocational_Rehabilitation_State_Grants
1032.770-4 Policy. ( a ) A fixed-price, time-and-materials or labor-hour contract or order for commercial or non-commercial supplies or severable or non-severable services may be incrementally funded when— ( 1 ) Funds are provided to a Treasury Departmental Office or Bureau under a CR. This includes funds appropriated to a bureau, funds appropriated to another entity that will be directly obligated on a Treasury contract, and funds in a revolving fund or similar account that will be reimbursed by a customer agency funded by a CR;
( 2 ) Sufficient funds are not being allocated from the responsible fiscal authority to fully fund the contract action that is otherwise authorized to be issued;
( 3 ) There is no statutory restriction that would preclude the proposed use of funds;
( 4 ) Funds are available and unexpired, as of the date the funds are obligated;
( 5 ) Assurance is provided by the responsible financial authority that full funding is anticipated once an Appropriation Act is enacted; and
( 6 ) The clause prescribed by 1032.770-7 is incorporated into the contract or order.
( b ) Incremental funding may be limited to individual line item(s) or a particular order(s).
### ENCLOSURE 1

State Authority

### ENCLOSURE 2

SIP Completeness Checklist

## STATE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN COMPLETENESS

CHECKLIST

ARIZONA REGIONAL HAZE STATE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN (SIP)

1. SUBMITTAL LETTER FROM GOVERNOR/DESIGNEE

See cover letter.

2. EVIDENCE OF ADOPTION

See cover letter.

3. STATE LEGAL AUTHORITY FOR ADOPTION/IMPLEMENTATION

See Enclosure 1.

4. COMPLETE COPY OF APPLICABLE REGULATION

Not Applicable.

5. EVIDENCE THAT ARIZONA ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE ACT

REQUIREMENTS (ARS '' 41-1021 through 1036) WERE MET FOR RULES

See Appendix A-5 and A-10.

6 EVIDENCE OF PUBLIC HEARING PER 40 CFR 51.102

See Appendix A-18.

7 PUBLIC COMMENTS AND AGENCY RESPONSE

See Appendix A-18.

8. IDENTIFICATION OF POLLUTANTS REGULATED BY RULE

Sulfur dioxide (SO 2 ), Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx), Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs),

and Particulate Matter (PM).

9. IDENTIFICATION OF SOURCES/ATTAINMENT STATUS

Not Applicable.10. WRITTEN SUMMARY OF RULE/RULE CHANGE

See Chapter 5 and Appendix A-5 (Reasonably Attributable Visibility Impairment Rule);

Chapter 7 and Appendix A-7 (Draft WEB Trading Program Rule); Chapter 10 and

Appendix A-10 (Fire Rules).

11. RULE CHANGES INDICATED BY UNDERLINING AND CROSS-OUTS

See Appendix A-5 and Appendix A-10.

12. RULES’ EFFECT ON EMISSIONS

See Technical Support Document, Chapter 2.

13 DEMONSTRATION THAT NAAQS, PSD INCREMENTS AND RFP ARE

PROTECTED

Not Applicable.

14. EVIDENCE THAT EMISSIONS LIMI TATIONS ARE BASED ON CONTINUOUS

EMISSIONS REDUCTION TECHNOLOGY

Not Applicable.

15. MODELING SUPPORT

See Technical Support Document, Chapter 1.

16. IDENTIFICATION OF RULE SECTIONS CONTAINING EMISSION LIMITS, WORK

PRACTICE STANDARDS, AND/OR RECORD KEEPING/REPORTING

REQUIREMENTS

See Appendix A-5, Appendix A-7, and Appendix A-10.

17. COMPLIANCE/ENFORCEMENT STRATEGIES

See Enclosure 3, Chapter 1.

18 ECONOMIC TECHNICAL JUSTIFICATION FOR DEVIATION FROM EPA

POLICIES

No known deviation from EPA policy.

### ENCLOSURE 3

Arizona Regional Haze State Implementation Plan (SIP)
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 153 

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

in the One Hundred Eighteenth Congress. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 24, 2023 

Mr. BOST (for himself and Mr. TAKANO) submitted the following resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on House Administration 

RESOLUTION 

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on 

Veterans’ Affairs in the One Hundred Eighteenth Congress. 

1 Resolved, 

2 SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES. 

3 For the expenses of the Committee on Veterans’ Af4 fairs (hereafter in this resolution referred to as the ‘‘Com5 mittee’’), including the expenses of all staff salaries, there 

6 shall be paid, out of the applicable accounts of the House 

7 of Representatives for committee salaries and expenses, 

8 not more than $10,753,197 for the One Hundred Eight9 eenth Congress. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 153 IH 

1 SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS. 

2 Of the amount specified in section 1— 

3 (1) not more than $5,271,175 shall be available 

4 for expenses incurred during the period beginning at 

5 noon on January 3, 2023, and ending immediately 

6 before noon on January 3, 2024; and 

7 (2) not more than $5,482,022 shall be available 

8 for expenses incurred during the period beginning at 

9 noon on January 3, 2024, and ending immediately 

10 before noon on January 3, 2025. 

11 SEC. 3. VOUCHERS. 

12 Payments under this resolution shall be made on 

13 vouchers authorized by the Committee, signed by the 

14 Chairman of the Committee, and approved in the manner 

15 directed by the Committee on House Administration. 

16 SEC. 4. REGULATIONS. 

17 Amounts made available under this resolution shall 

18 be expended in accordance with regulations prescribed by 

19 the Committee on House Administration. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
### §608c–1. Repealed. June 29, 1945, ch. 196, 59 Stat. 263

Section, acts Apr. 13, 1938, ch. 143, §3, 52 Stat. 215; May 26, 1939, ch. 150, 53 Stat. 782; Feb. 10, 1942, ch. 52, §1, 56 Stat. 85, related to orders applicable to hops. Section was not a part of the Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1933.
EXHIBIT 32 (b)

                             CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In  connection  with the  Annual  Report  of Enzo  Biochem,  Inc.,  and
Subsidiaries  ("the  Company")  on Form 10-K for the fiscal  year ended July 31,
2005 as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof
(the  "Report"),  I, Barry  Weiner.,  Chief  Financial  Officer of the  Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

               (1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section
13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


               (2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects,  the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



Date:  October 14, 2005                         By: /s/ Barry Weiner
                                                    ----------------

                                                        Barry Weiner
                                                        Chief Financial Officer





         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other  document  authenticating,   acknowledging,   or  otherwise  adopting  the
signature  that  appears in typed form  within  the  electronic  version of this
written statement  required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Act
Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.2

BULOVA TECHNOLOGIES GROUP, INC. AND CONSOLIDATED AFFILIATE

Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C.
Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection
with the Annual Report of Bulova Technologies Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John D. Stanton, Principal Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ John D. StantonJohn D. StantonPrincipal Financial OfficerMarch 31, 2010




30
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

 v.

WADE PATRICK WRIGHT,

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 16-30154

D.C. No. 9:15-cr-00025-DWM

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Montana

Donald W. Molloy, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 11, 2017** 

Before: GOULD, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges. 

Wade Patrick Wright appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges the 58-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for

possession with intent to distribute controlled substances, in violation of 21 U.S.C.

§ 841(a)(1). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We dismiss, but

FILED

APR 20 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
remand for the district court to correct the judgment.

Wright contends that the district court violated his due process rights by

relying on unreliable hearsay evidence in applying a two-level enhancement

pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1(b)(1). The government contends that this appeal is

barred by the appeal waiver contained in the parties’ plea agreement. Reviewing

de novo, see United States v. Bibler, 495 F.3d 621, 623 (9th Cir. 2007), we

dismiss. The district court did not abuse its discretion in finding that the hearsay

statements had sufficient indicia of reliability given the corroborating firearm and

drug evidence found in Wright’s apartment. See United States v. HernandezGuerrero, 633 F.3d 933, 935 (9th Cir. 2011) (reliability determination reviewed for

abuse of discretion); United States v. Vanderwerfhorst, 576 F.3d 929, 936 (9th Cir.

2009) (“Challenged information is deemed false or unreliable if it lacks some

minimal indicium of reliability beyond mere allegation.” (internal quotations

omitted)). In any event, the district court correctly determined that, independent of

the challenged hearsay, it was not “clearly improbable” that Wright possessed a

firearm in connection with his drug offense. See U.S.S.G § 2D1.1 cmt. n. 11(A). 

Because Wright’s due process rights were not violated, we dismiss pursuant to the

valid appeal waiver. See Bibler, 495 F.3d at 624.

We remand to the district court with instructions to correct Wright’s

2 16-30154
judgment to reflect the correct statute of conviction, 21 U.S.C. § 841.

DISMISSED; REMANDED to correct the judgment.

3 16-30154
### §415. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 415 was editorially reclassified as section 2241b of this title.
### §2006e. Prohibition on use of loans for certain purposes

The Secretary shall not approve any loan under this chapter to drain, dredge, fill, level, or otherwise manipulate a wetland (as defined in section 3801(a)(16) 1 of title 16), or to engage in any activity that results in impairing or reducing the flow, circulation, or reach of water, except in the case of activity related to the maintenance of previously converted wetlands, or in the case of such activity that is already commenced before November 28, 1990. This section shall not apply to a loan made or guaranteed under this chapter for a utility line.

(Pub. L. 87–128, title III, §363, as added Pub. L. 101–624, title XVIII, §1824, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 3831; amended Pub. L. 102–237, title V, §501(i), Dec. 13, 1991, 105 Stat. 1868; Pub. L. 104–127, title VII, §751, Apr. 4, 1996, 110 Stat. 1129.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this title", meaning title III of Pub. L. 87–128, Aug. 8, 1961, 75 Stat. 307, known as the Consolidated Farm and Rural Development Act, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of title III to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1921 of this title and Tables.

Section 3801(a) of title 16, referred to in text, was subsequently amended, and section 3801(a)(16) no longer defines the term "wetland". However, such term is defined elsewhere in that section.

#### Amendments

1996—Pub. L. 104–127 inserted at end "This section shall not apply to a loan made or guaranteed under this chapter for a utility line."

1991—Pub. L. 102–237 inserted a closing parenthesis after "3801(a)(16) of title 16" and substituted "before November 28, 1990" for "prior to the date of enactment of this section".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1991 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 102–237 effective as if included in the provision of the Food, Agriculture, Conservation, and Trade Act of 1990, Pub. L. 101–624, to which the amendment relates, see section 1101(b)(3) of Pub. L. 102–237, set out as a note under section 1421 of this title.

1 See References in Text note below.
#### Domizio & Everts, Inc., Respondent, v. A. E. Ottaviano, Inc., Appellant.

Motion by appellant for a stay, pending appeal, denied. Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Hill and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 21

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

                    THE WASHINGTON CORPORATION - SUBSIDIARIES
                             As of December 31, 2000

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                      STATE OF
                                                    FORMATION OR               DATE OF
            SUBSIDIARY                             INCORPORATION              FORMATION
            ----------                             -------------              ---------
<S>                                                <C>                        <C>
Arlington Square Limited Partnership                 Maryland                  09/17/85

Four Year Trail Limited Partnership                  Virginia                  09/16/87

Nanjemoy Associates Limited Partnership              Maryland                  01/11/88

TWC Development Corporation                          Maryland                  04/08/85

TWC Real Estate, Inc.                                Virginia                  04/15/85

Arlington Square, Inc.                               Virginia                  02/28/91

Four Year Trail, Inc.                                Virginia                  02/28/91
</TABLE>