alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|   | · | The                Covered Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)                or                15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;                and                    |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                     |
|   | · | The                information contained in the Covered Report fairly presents, in all                material respects, the financial condition and results of operations                of                the Company. |

| Date:                February 28, 2007 | /s/ James                H.                Miller                                   James                H. MillerChairman,                President and Chief Executive OfficerPPL                Corporation |
|----------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Three-Five
Systems, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, Jeffrey D. Buchanan, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer,
Secretary, Treasurer, and Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
78m(a) or 78o(d)); and  
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

| |                                                      
| | -----------------------------------------------------
| | /s/ Jeffrey D. Buchanan                              
| |                                                      
| | Jeffrey D. Buchanan                                  
| | Chief Financial Officer,
Secretary, and Treasurer and
| | Director                                             

April 30, 2003



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Three-Five Systems, Inc. and will be retained by Three-Five
Systems, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
### §8713. Repealed. Pub. L. 113–79, title I, §1101, Feb. 7, 2014, 128 Stat. 658

Section, Pub. L. 110–234, title I, §1103, May 22, 2008, 122 Stat. 941; Pub. L. 110–246, §4(a), title I, §1103, June 18, 2008, 122 Stat. 1664, 1669, related to availability of direct payments for 2008 through 2012 crop years.
§ 635.3 Special requirements of the Privacy Act of 1974. ( a ) Certain PII is protected in accordance with the provisions of the Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. 552a, as implemented by 32 CFR part 310, DoD Privacy Program, 32 CFR part 505, The Army Privacy Program, and OMB guidance defining PII.
( b ) Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(e)(3), when an Army activity asks an individual for his or her PII that will be maintained in a system of records, the activity must provide the individual with a Privacy Act Statement (PAS). A PAS notifies individuals of the authority, purpose, and use of the collection, whether the information is mandatory or voluntary, and the effects of not providing all or any part of the requested information.
( c ) Army law enforcement personnel performing official duties often require an individual's PII, including SSN, for identification purposes. This PII can be used to complete law enforcement reports and records. In addition to Executive Order 9397, as amended by Executive Order 13478, the solicitation of the SSN is authorized by paragraph 2.c.(2) of DoD Instruction 1000.30, “Reduction of Social Security Number (SSN) Use Within DoD” (available at *http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/corres/pdf/100030p.pdf*). The purpose is to provide commanders and law enforcement officials with means by which information may accurately be identified. The SSN is used as an additional/alternate means of identification to facilitate filing and retrieval. The following procedures will be used for identification: ( 1 ) Retired military personnel are required to produce their Common Access Card or DD Form 2 (Ret) (U.S. Armed Forces of the United States General Convention Identification Card), or other government issued identification, as appropriate.
( 2 ) Family members of sponsors will be requested to produce their DD Form 1173 (Uniformed Services Identification and Privilege Card). Information contained thereon (for example, the sponsor's SSN) will be used to verify and complete applicable sections of law enforcement reports and related forms.
( 3 ) Non-Department of Defense (DoD) civilians, including military family members and those whose status is unknown, will be advised of the provisions of the Privacy Act Statement when requested to disclose their PII, including SSN, as required.
( d ) Notwithstanding the requirement to furnish an individual with a PAS when his or her PII will be maintained in a system of records, AR 340-21, The Army Privacy Program, *http://www.apd.army.mil/pdffiles/r340_21.pdf ,* provides that records contained in SORN A0190-45, Military Police Reporting Program Records (MRRP), *http://dpcld.defense.gov/Privacy/SORNsIndex/tabid/5915/Article/6066/a0190-45-opmg.aspx ,* that fall within 5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2) are exempt from the requirement in 5 U.S.C. 552a(e)(3) to provide a PAS.
[80 FR 28549, May 19, 2015, as amended at 81 FR 17386, Mar. 29, 2016]
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v John Torchia, Appellant.

[832 NYS2d 826]—

Mercure, J.E

Appeal from an order of the County Court of Columbia County (Leaman, J.), entered May 4, 2000, which classified defendant as a risk level III sex offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act.

Defendant was convicted in Tennessee of attempted aggravated sexual battery, a felony for which he was required to register as a sex offender, and sentenced to six years of probation. Upon transfer of his probation supervision to Columbia County, a hearing was conducted to determine defendant’s risk level classification. At the conclusion of the hearing, County Court designated him a risk level III sex offender in accordance with the Sex Offender Registration Act *(see*Correction Law art 6-C). Defendant appeals and we now reverse.

Although this issue is not raised by defendant, we note sua sponte that the Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders failed to complete the entire risk assessment instrument, as it was required to do notwithstanding the existence of an override factor, and the error cannot be deemed harmless inasmuch as there is no indication in the record that County Court considered “all relevant evidence and made ‘a final determination of the defendant’s risk level based on clear and convincing evidence thereof ” *(People v Sanchez,*20 AD3d 693, 694 [2005], quoting *People v Brown,*302 AD2d 919, 920 [2003]; *see People v Sass,*27 AD3d 968, 969 [2006]; *see also*Sex Offender Registration Act: *1138Risk Assessment Guidelines and Commentary, at 2 [Nov. 1997]; *cf. People v McClelland,*38 AD3d 1274, 1275 [2007]). In any event, County Court did not issue an order detailing the findings of fact and conclusions of law upon which its determination was premised *(see*Correction Law § 168-n [3]), thereby precluding meaningful appellate review of defendant’s designation as a risk level III sex offender *(see People v Sass, supra*at 969; *People v Miranda,*24 AD3d 909, 910-911 [2005]; *People v Sanchez, supra*at 694). Accordingly, we remit this matter to County Court for a disposition in compliance with the mandates of the statute *(see*Correction Law art 6-C) and in accordance with this decision.

The parties’ remaining arguments are rendered academic by our determination.

Spain, Carpinello, Lahtinen and Kane, JJ., concur. Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, without costs, and matter remitted to the County Court of Columbia County for further proceedings not inconsistent with this Court’s decision.
#### Erie County Board of Social Welfare, Respondent, v. Wallace Holiday, Appellant.

Motion granted to prosecute appeal on one certified copy of judgment roll, one copy of stenographic minutes and five typewritten copies of appellant’s brief.
### §2568. False marking; cease and desist orders

(a) Each of the following acts, if performed in connection with the sale, offering for sale, or advertising of sexually or asexually reproducible plant material or tubers or parts of tubers, is prohibited, and the Secretary may, if the Secretary determines after an opportunity for hearing that the act is being so performed, issue an order to cease and desist, said order being binding unless appealed under section 2461 of this title:

(1) Use of the words "U.S. Protected Variety" or any word or number importing that the material is a variety protected under certificate, when it is not.

(2) Use of any wording importing that the material is a variety for which an application for plant variety protection is pending, when it is not.

(3) Use of either the phrase "Unauthorized Propagation Prohibited" or "Unauthorized Seed Multiplication Prohibited" or similar phrase without reasonable basis. Any reasonable basis expires one year after the first sale of the variety except as justified thereafter by a pending application or a certificate still in force.

(4) Failure to use the name of a variety for which a certificate of protection has been issued under this chapter, even after the expiration of the certificate, except that lawn, turf, or forage grass seed, or alfalfa or clover seed may be sold without a variety name unless use of the name of a variety for which a certificate of protection has been issued under this chapter is required under State law.

(b) Anyone convicted of violating a binding cease and desist order, or of performing any act prohibited in subsection (a) of this section for the purpose of deceiving the public, shall be fined not more than $10,000 and not less than $500.

(c) Anyone whose business is damaged or is likely to be damaged by an act prohibited in subsection (a) of this section, or is subjected to competition in connection with which such act is performed, may have remedy by civil action.

(Pub. L. 91–577, title III, §128, Dec. 24, 1970, 84 Stat. 1557; Pub. L. 96–574, §19(c), Dec. 22, 1980, 94 Stat. 3352; Pub. L. 103–349, §§12, 13(v), Oct. 6, 1994, 108 Stat. 3142, 3144; Pub. L. 115–334, title X, §10108(d), Dec. 20, 2018, 132 Stat. 4906.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 115–334 inserted "or asexually" after "sexually" in introductory provisions.

1994—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 103–349 inserted "or tubers or parts of tubers" after "plant material" and substituted "if the Secretary determines" for "if he determines" in introductory provisions, and added par. (4).

1980—Subsec. (a)(3). Pub. L. 96–574 substituted provisions respecting prohibitions for use of phrases "Unauthorized Propagation Prohibited" and "Unauthorized Seed Multiplication Prohibited" for provisions respecting prohibitions for use of phrase "propagation prohibited".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1994 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 103–349 effective 180 days after Oct. 6, 1994, see section 15 of Pub. L. 103–349, set out as a note under section 2401 of this title.
1.405 Deviations pertaining to treaties and executive agreements. ( a ) *Executive agreements,* as used in this section, means Government-to-Government agreements, including agreements with international organizations, to which the United States is a party.
( b ) Any deviation from the FAR required to comply with a treaty to which the United States is a party is authorized, unless the deviation would be inconsistent with FAR coverage based on a law enacted after the execution of the treaty.
( c ) Any deviation from the FAR required to comply with an executive agreement is authorized unless the deviation would be inconsistent with FAR coverage based on law.
( d ) For civilian agencies other than NASA, a copy of the text deviation authorized under paragraph (b) or (c) of this section shall be transmitted to the FAR Secretariat through a central agency control point.
( e ) For civilian agencies other than NASA, if a deviation required to comply with a treaty or an executive agreement is not authorized by paragraph (b) or (c) of this section, then the request for deviation shall be processed through the FAR Secretariat to the Civilian Agency Acquisition Council.
[48 FR 42103, Sept. 19, 1983, as amended at 61 FR 67411, Dec. 20, 1996]
EXHIBIT 13.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the twelve months ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”).  I, Lisa Sharp, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:





(1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date: July 7, 2011
By:
/s/ Lisa SharpLisa Sharp, Principal Financial Officer
exv10w198w1



 






Exhibit 10.198.1




AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO

LIMITED RECOURSE INTEREST INDUCEMENT AGREEMENT




     This Amendment No. 1 to Limited Recourse Interest Inducement Agreement (the “Amendment”) is
effective as of March 7, 2006, and amends the LIMITED RECOURSE INTEREST INDUCEMENT AGREEMENT, dated
as of February 22, 2006 (the “Agreement”), by and between The Immune Response Corporation, a
Delaware corporation, and Spencer Trask Intellectual Capital Company, LLC.



     1. In the first WHEREAS clause of the Agreement, the number “$5,000,000” is amended to instead
read “$8,000,000.”



     2. The third WHEREAS clause of the Agreement is amended and restated to read in its entirety
as follows:



     “WHEREAS, in the event that the assets of the Company subject to the Security Agreement are
insufficient to satisfy in full the obligations of the Company to the Investors upon an event of
default under the Investor Notes, STIC will provide an additional interest to support the
obligations of the Company to the designated Investors upon an event of default under up to
$6,000,000 original principal amount of the Investor Notes pursuant to a certain Limited Recourse
Interest Agreement, dated of even date herewith (the “Limited Recourse Interest Agreement”),
executed by STIC in favor of the Agent, acting in its capacity as agent for the designated
Investors.”



     3. Except as expressly amended hereby, the Agreement remains unchanged and in full force and
effect.



     4. This Amendment may be executed in counterparts and each of such counterparts
shall for all purposes be deemed to be an original, and such counterparts shall together constitute
one and the same instrument.



[Remainder of page intentionally left blank]



 









 








     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed, or have caused to be executed, this
Amendment as of the date first written above.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	THE IMMUNE RESPONSE CORPORATION
	 
	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	By:	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	Name:	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	Title:	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	SPENCER TRASK INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL COMPANY, LLC
	 
	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	By:	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	Name:	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	Title:
#### Louis Stone v. William Andacht, Inc.

Application granted. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Stevens and Eager, JJ.
#### Alice Frazier, Individually, and as Guardian ad Litem of Mary A. Frazier, an Infant, Respondent, v. City of Amsterdam, Appellant.

*Per Curiam.*

The order granting permission to file a late notice of claim (General Municipal Law, § 50-e, subd. 5) was proper under the decisions of this court. (See *Matter of Osborn*v. *Board of Educ.,*5 A D 2d 929; *Galerneau*v. *North Colonie Cent. School Dist.,*7 A D 2d 693; *Matter of Daigneault*v. *Board of Educ.,*7 A D 2d 695; and see, also, *Matter of Biancoviso*v. *City of New York,*285 App. Div. 320 [2d Dept., 1955].) Order affirmed, with $20 costs. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Taylor, Aulisi and Hamm, JJ„ concur.
EXHIBIT 10.4

LEASE EXTENSION AGREEMENT

BETWEEN

WEIR REDEVELOPMENT COMPANY

AND

KIRKHILL TA CORPORATION

Both Weir Redevelopment Company and Kirkhill TA Corporation agree to extend an original lease dated June 1, 1998, which
has been extended and amended by mutual agreement since its inception. The extended term will incorporate the following revised terms.



| | 1. | The term of the extended lease will be for one (1) year commencing on May 1, 2010 and terminating on April 30, 2011.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The annual base rent will be $224,016.00 payable monthly in advance in equal payments of $18,668.00.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 3. | Lessee may extend term for two (2) additional one (1) year terms with a six month notice to Lessor at the same annual base rent.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                   |  |                                                         |  |  |  | 
|---------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------- |  |  |  | 
|Agreed to this dayOctober 30, 2009 |  |                                                         |  | 
|                                   |  |                                                         | 
|By:                                |  | /s/ Leonard S. Jolles                                   |  |  |  | 
|                                   |  | Leonard S. Jolles        Weir Redevelopment Corporation |  |  |  | 
|                                   |  |                                                         | 
|By:                                |  | /s/ Jim Sweeney                                         |  |  |  | 
|                                   |  | Kirkhill TA Corporation                                 |  |  |  |
Exhibit 10.2
                                                                    ------------



                Summary of Compensation to Non-Employee Director
                ------------------------------------------------

     On March 29, 2006 (the "Grant Date"),  Ms. Vicky A. Bailey was elected as a
director of Cheniere  Energy,  Inc. (the "Company") and was granted 25,000 fully
vested stock options with a term of ten years.  The exercise  price of the stock
options is the closing  price of the  Company's  common stock as reported on the
American  Stock  Exchange on the Grant Date or $40.27.  In addition,  Ms. Bailey
received  compensation  for the term of service  from March 29, 2006 through May
2006 of $25,000.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           7,973
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,780
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    372,855
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               391,722
<PP&E>                                         231,530
<DEPRECIATION>                                 231,266
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 397,747
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          923,090
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        97,014
<OTHER-SE>                                   (622,357)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   397,747
<SALES>                                         51,935
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                51,935
<CGS>                                           47,176
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   47,176
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,257
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,498)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,498)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,498)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.01)
        

</TABLE>
#### Alwin Construction Company, Inc. *v.*Douglas M. Costle, Commissioner of Environmental Protection et al.

*Samuel M. Chambliss,*in support of the motion.

Submitted January 23

decided January 29, 1975

The “Application of Co-Defendant, CBET, Inc., to Join in the Motion for Review of Douglas M. Costle, Commissioner of Environmental Protection” in the appeal from the Court of Common Pleas in Fairfield County is denied.
DOCUMENT REMOVED DUE TO REASON[S ] CHECKED BELOW

9 DOCUMENT ENTERED IN ERROR

9 DOCUMENT WITHDRAWN/REMOVED PER COURT ORDER OF

__________________.

9 INCORRECT DOCUMENT LINKED
#### Bell Television, Inc., et al., Appellants, v. Cal-New Yorker, Inc., et al., Defendants, and New Yorker Towers, Ltd., Respondent.

Order entered on September 15, 1960, granting defendant-respondent’s motion, pursuant to rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice, to dismiss the amended complaint, *592unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondent. No opinion. Concur — Valente, J. P., McNally, Stevens, Eager and Noonan, JJ.