alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 5 (Friday, January 8, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 1558]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-00168]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration #16832 and #16833; California Disaster Number CA-
00332]


Administrative Declaration of a Disaster for the State of 
California

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a notice of an Administrative declaration of a 
disaster for the State of California dated 12/30/2020.
    Incident: Mountain View Fire.
    Incident Period: 11/17/2020 through 11/23/2020.

DATES: Issued on 12/30/2020.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 03/01/2021.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 09/30/2021.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of 
the Administrator's disaster declaration, applications for disaster 
loans may be filed at the address listed above or other locally 
announced locations.
    The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected 
by the disaster:

Primary Counties: Mono.
Contiguous Counties:
    California: Alpine, Fresno, Inyo, Madera, Tuolumne.
    Nevada: Douglas, Esmeralda, Lyon, Mineral.
The Interest Rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Physical Damage:
  Homeowners With Credit Available Elsewhere.................      2.250
  Homeowners Without Credit Available Elsewhere..............      1.125
  Businesses With Credit Available Elsewhere.................      6.000
  Businesses Without Credit Available Elsewhere..............      3.000
  Non-Profit Organizations With Credit Available Elsewhere...      2.000
  Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere      2.000
For Economic Injury:
  Businesses & Small Agricultural Cooperatives Without Credit      3.000
   Available Elsewhere.......................................
  Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere      2.000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 16832 5 
and for economic injury is 16833 0.
    The States which received an EIDL Declaration # are California, 
Nevada.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

Jovita Carranza,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2021-00168 Filed 1-7-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8026-03-P
No. 295.

#### E. W. Blancett *v.*State of New Mexico.

Error to the Supreme Court of the State of New Mexico.

Submitted March 25, 1920.

Decided April 19, 1920.

*Mr. A. B. Renehan*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. O. O. Askren, Mr. Harry S. Bowman*and *Mr. N. D. Meyer*for defendant in error.

*Per Curiam.*

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of § 237 of the Judicial Code, as amended by the Act of September 6, 1916, c. 448, § 2, 39 Stat. 726.
EXHIBIT 11(a)
                                -------------

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
 
                               GROSSMAN'S INC.
 
                      COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                    (in thousands, except per share data)
 
 
                                THREE MONTHS ENDED       NINE MONTHS ENDED
                                  SEPTEMBER 30,            SEPTEMBER 30,  
                               --------------------    --------------------
                                 1997        1996        1997        1996
                                 ----        ----        ----        ----
 <S>                           <C>         <C>         <C>        <C>
 Net income (loss) for 
 primary and fully diluted
 earnings per share            $(5,538)    $ 1,570     $(25.125)  $(56,063)
                               ========    ========    =========  =========
 
 Weighted average number 
   of shares outstanding        28,080      27,159       27,988     26,571
 
 Net effect of convertible
   shares                           -        6,872           -          -
 
 Net effect of dilutive 
   stock options                    -           13           -          -
                               --------    --------    ---------  ---------
 
 Total weighted average 
   shares outstanding and 
   common stock equivalents 
   used in primary 
   calculation of earnings
   per share                    28,080      34,044       27,988     26,571
 
 Additional dilution from 
   stock options                    -           -           -           -   
                               --------    --------    ---------  ---------
 
 Total weighted average 
   shares outstanding and 
   common stock equivalents 
   used in fully diluted
   calculation of earnings
   per share                    28,080      34,044       27,988     26,571
                               ========    ========     ========  =========
 
 
 
 Primary earnings (loss) 
   per share                    $(0.20)      $0.05       $(0.90)    $(2.11)
                               ========    ========     ========  =========
 
 Fully diluted earnings 
   (loss) per share             $(0.20)      $0.05       $(0.90)    $(2.11)
                               ========    ========     ========  =========
</TABLE>
Prairie Wetlands are Important for Carbon Storage

atmospheric carbon can be stored in 

wetlands through restoration programs 

when compared with cropland, even 

though the acreage of wetlands 

is much smaller. These restored 

wetlands will also provide improved 

habitat for wildlife in the prairie 

pothole region. 

Why Should We Care? Evidence 

for global warming is increasing 

and there is growing public concern 

over the management of global 

greenhouse gases. The Kyoto Protocol 

represents an international effort by 

many industrialized nations to reduce 

greenhouse emissions. Although 

the United States has not signed the 

Kyoto Protocol, we share concerns 

over global climate change and are 

committed to seeking appropriate 

solutions. 

What Can We Do? The finding 

that prairie wetlands are important 

for carbon storage presents a new 

opportunity for industry to partner 

with private landowners to store 

carbon emitted into the atmosphere. 

A recent Joyce Foundation grant 

was used to create a market for 

trading greenhouse gas emissions 

(see www.chicagoclimatex.com) 

that initially targeted a 7-state 

area in the Midwest but will 

expand to international markets 

by 2004. Carbon storage is also 

being implemented directly between 

industry and private land owners. 

Entergy, a leading utility company, 

has committed to purchasing 30,000 

tons of carbon stored by zerotillage farmers over the next 10 

years. Further, storage of carbon in 

agricultural soil and marketing of 

U.S. Department of the Interior

U.S. Geological Survey

USGS Fact Sheet Number FS-067-02

July 2002

USGS’s Northern Prairie Wildlife 

Research Center and USDA’s 

Agricultural Research Service 

collaborated to study the potential 

of prairie pothole region wetlands 

to sequester carbon emitted into the 

atmosphere from the burning of fossil 

fuels. Results suggest that wetlands 

traditionally functioned as sinks for 

atmospheric carbon, but cultivation, 

the current principal land use, has 

shifted their function to be sources 

of atmospheric carbon. Data suggest 

that equal or greater amounts of 

carbon credits has been the subject 

of much debate by various state 

legislatures and during the drafting 

of the federal farm bill. Wetlands 

provide additional opportunities for 

carbon trading and storage. 

What Next? Our initial work on 

carbon storage in prairie wetlands 

focused on the two most common 

wetland types and land-use. 

Information on total greenhouse gas 

fluxes is needed for other wetland 

types and different agricultural landuses to identify cost-effective methods 

that maximize storage of atmospheric 

carbon in wetlands.

For more information:

Jay Hestbeck, Center Director

8711 37th St. Southeast

Jamestown, ND 58401-7317

701-253-5500

www.npwrc.usgs.gov

The prairie pothole region in North Dakota

Industrialization is causing an imbalance in 

the carbon cycle

Prairie Pothole Region covers much of the 

Dakotas and Minnesota
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

DARIN DAVIS, JR.,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 122 WAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 22nd day of August, 2018

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Gordon Stewart, Appellant, v. Walter H. Wilkins, as Warden of Attica Prison, Respondent.

— Order unanimously affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. Appellant specifically waived assignment of counsel upon this appeal. (Appeal from order of Wyoming County Court dismissing writ of habeas corpus, *749following a hearing, and remanding relator to custody of Warden.) Present — B as tow, J. P., Goldman, Henry, Noonan and Del Veechio, JJ.
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.1

Certification of Bradford A. Mills, Chief Executive Officer

In connection with the Annual Report of Rio Algom Limited (the Company) on
Form 40-F for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2002 (the Report), I, Bradford
A. Mills, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

Date: November 15, 2002



| | Bradford A. Mills
Bradford A. Mills
Chief Executive Officer
| | -------------------------------------------------------------
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                          5
<MULTIPLIER>                       1,000
       
<S>                                <C>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  MAY-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                     JUN-1-1997
<PERIOD-END>                       FEB-28-1998
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      9-MOS
<CASH>                                              48
<SECURITIES>                                        0 
<RECEIVABLES>                                   74,690
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,370
<INVENTORY>                                         0 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    0 
<PP&E>                                         518,312
<DEPRECIATION>                                 172,784
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 472,979
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               0 
<BONDS>                                             0 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0 
<PREFERRED>                                         0 
<COMMON>                                        10,114
<OTHER-SE>                                          0 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   472,979
<SALES>                                         24,486
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               174,585
<CGS>                                           21,805
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  127,143
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,320
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 42,122
<INCOME-TAX>                                    17,270
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             24,852
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0 
<CHANGES>                                           0 
<NET-INCOME>                                    24,852
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.99
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.99
        

</TABLE>
**REGULATORY EVALUATION**

**Directorate Identifier:**

___2013

_______ - NM -

_____ 2 38

_____ - AD **Executive Order 12866:** Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:** Is the AD significan t? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Regulatory Flexibility Act:** Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:** This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES ( ) explain NO (X)
Exhibit 10.1 Promissory Note - Maricopa


    Exhibit
      10.1

    Form
      10-KSB 

    Cardiff
      International, Inc.

    File
      No.
      000-49709

    PROMISSORY
      NOTE

    
      	
              $100,000

            	
              Minneapolis,
                Minnesota

              October
                27, 2005

            


    

    


    FOR
      VALUE RECEIVED,
      Legacy
      Card Company, Inc., a Nevada Corporation (the “Borrower”), promises to pay to
      the order of Maricopa Equity Management Corporation, a Minnesota Corporation
      (the “Lender”), the principal amount of $100,000 within 60 days or at the
      closing of the merger between Legacy and Cardiff, whichever comes first, plus
      interest at an annual rate of 8%. The proceeds are to be paid directly out
      of
      the escrow account at the closing of the merger between Legacy and Cardiff,
      and
      Legacy Card Company and Gary Teel agree to this.

    


    All
      such
      payments of principal and interest shall be made in lawful money of the United
      States pursuant to wire instructions provided by Lender, or to the Lender at
      the
      address set forth below.

    


    In
      consideration for Maricopa Equity Management Corporation making this loan,
      Legacy Card Company will issue to Maricopa, 100,000 shares of Legacy Card
      Company, Inc. Common stock (in addition to any stock they may own). This stock
      will be issued at the closing of the merger and a certificate will be Fed Ex’ed
      to Maricopa within two weeks of the closing. These 100,000 shares are the same
      as the $1.10 shares (post split).

    


    All
      payments, certificates and notices are to be sent to Maricopa Equity Management
      Corporation, 10125 Crosstown Circle, Suite 210, Eden Prairie, MN
      55344.

    


    This
      loan
      is also personally guaranteed by Gary Teel, and if for whatever reason, Legacy
      Card Company does not go public or is not public within 60 days of this note,
      this note is the due in full and if Legacy Card Company cannot pay, or does
      not
      pay the balance due, Gary Teel is personally liable for the amounts due and
      will
      pay the balance immediately.

    


    Governing
      Law. This Promissory Note and the Guaranty Agreement shall be construed in
      accordance with and governed by the substantive laws of the State of Minnesota,
      and shall be subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of and the
      United States federal courts sitting in the State of Minnesota

    


    The
      Borrower shall pay all costs of collection, including reasonable attorneys
      fees
      and expenses, incurred by holder in connection with the enforcement of this
      Note.

    


    Legacy
      Card Company, Inc.

    


    By:
      /s/
      Gary Teel

    Its:
      Chairman
### §5692. Administrator of Foreign Agricultural Service

#### (a) Establishment

There is hereby established in the Department of Agriculture the position of Administrator of the Foreign Agricultural Service.

#### (b) Duties

The Administrator of the Foreign Agricultural Service is authorized to exercise such functions and perform such duties related to foreign agriculture, and shall perform such other duties, as may be required by law or prescribed by the Secretary of Agriculture.

#### (c) Use of Service

In carrying out the duties under this section, the Administrator shall oversee the operations of the Foreign Agricultural Service, the General Sales Manager, and the Agricultural Attaché Service.

(Pub. L. 95–501, title V, §502, as added Pub. L. 101–624, title XV, §1531, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 3686.)
### §8354. Expenditures for cooperative agreements to lease aircraft

On and after November 10, 2005, notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Secretary of Agriculture may use appropriations available to the Secretary for activities authorized under sections 8351 to 8353 1 of this title, under this or any other Act, to enter into cooperative agreements, with a State, political subdivision, or agency thereof, a public or private agency, organization, or any other person, to lease aircraft if the Secretary determines that the objectives of the agreement will: (1) serve a mutual interest of the parties to the agreement in carrying out the programs administered by the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Wildlife Services; and (2) all parties will contribute resources to the accomplishment of these objectives; award of a cooperative agreement authorized by the Secretary may be made for an initial term not to exceed 5 years.

(Pub. L. 109–97, title VII, §749, Nov. 10, 2005, 119 Stat. 2156.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Sections 8351 to 8353 of this title, referred to in text, was in the original a reference to "sections 426–426c of title 7, United States Code" and was translated as meaning act Mar. 2, 1931, ch. 370, 46 Stat. 1468, and Pub. L. 100–202, §101(k) [title I], Dec. 22, 1987, 101 Stat. 1329–322, 1329–331, which were formerly classified to sections 426 to 426c of this title. Sections 1 and 3 of the act of Mar. 2, 1931, which were formerly classified to sections 426 and 426b of this title, were editorially reclassified as sections 8351 and 8352, respectively, of this title. Section 2 of the act of Mar. 2, 1931, which was formerly classified to section 426a of this title, was omitted from the Code as obsolete. Pub. L. 100–202, §101(k) [title I], Dec. 22, 1987, 101 Stat. 1329–322, 1329–331, which was formerly classified to section 426c of this title, was editorially reclassified as section 8353 of this title.

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 426d of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in the following prior appropriation acts:

Pub. L. 108–447, div. A, title VII, §758, Dec. 8, 2004, 118 Stat. 2846.

Pub. L. 108–199, div. A, title VII, §776, Jan. 23, 2004, 118 Stat. 41.

1 See Reference in Text note below.
## Proposed Rule: Revisions to Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements, and Proposed Confidentiality

Determinations under the Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program Meeting Documentation : Waste Sector Meeting with US EPA Date Staff Contact

Information (Name, ema il, phone #) Nam e of Organization (Attach list of all attendees names and emails if possible) Summary of Discussion (e.g., applicability, reporting requirements, etc.) Written Comments Provided? Did they also submit to Docket? Date sent to

EPA

- CCD

Novem ber 20 , 2013 Lisa Grogan

McCulloch Grogan

-grogan mcculloch.lisa@epa .gov 617

- 918

- 1481 

### Kerry Kelly , Waste Management (kkelly 5@wm.com) Dina Kruger, Kruger Environmental Strategies (dina@krugerstrategies.com) Niki Wuestenberg, Republic Services ( nwuestenberg@republicservices.c om ) Ray Huff, SCS Engineers ( rhuff@scsengineers.com ) Ann Germaine, National Solid Waste Management Association ( agermain@envasns.org ) A meeting was held where stakeholders from the waste sector provided comments regarding the pro posed rule. The key issue covered was the use of the inp uts verifi cation tool. No written comments were provided during meeting. Comments submitted to docket. N/A

(comments submitted to docket.)
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6242
MICHAEL LUCAS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus GEORGE JONES, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (CA-96-75-BO) Submitted: May 16, 1996 Decided: June 5, 1996 Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael Lucas, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Lucas v. Jones , No. CA-96-75-BO (E.D.N.C. Feb. 2, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED