alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 724
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 724 appear at 65 FR 62616, Oct. 19, 2000.

§ 724.303 Functions: President, Naval Discharge Review Board. ( a ) Exercise primary cognizance within the Department of the Navy for matters relating to discharge review.
( b ) Supervise and direct the activities of the NDRB.
( c ) Maintain appropriate liaison with discharge review activities in other services (use Army Discharge Review Board as focal point for service coordination).
( d ) Maintain coordination with the Commandant of the Marine Corps (Code M) and the Commander, Naval Military Personnel Command in matters associated with discharge review.
( e ) In conformance with SECNAVINST 5211.5 series, protect the privacy of individuals in connection with discharge review.
( f ) Assure that NDRB functions are administered in accordance with the appropriate Secretary of the Navy instructions dealing with privacy and access to information.
( g ) Convene the NDRB as authorized by the Secretary of the Navy.
( h ) Direct the movement of the NDRB Traveling Panel(s) on the basis of regional hearing requests.
( i ) Monitor the performance of the naval discharge review system. Make recommendations for changes and improvements. Take action to avoid delays in processing of individual discharge review actions.
( j ) Provide NDRB inputs for the maintenance of a public reading file and maintain associated NDRB indexes updated quarterly.
[50 FR 10943, Mar. 19, 1985, as amended at 75 FR 747, Jan. 6, 2010]
### The Honorab le Russell G. Clark, United States District Judge 1 

### for the Western District of Missouri. ___________ No. 96-1343

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the v. * Western District of Missouri. * [UNPUBLISHED] Beverly Day, * * Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: June 6, 1996 Filed: June 11, 1996

___________ Before McMILLIAN, WOLLMAN, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Beverly Day pleaded guilty to posses sing methamphetamine with intent to dis tribute, and criminal forfeiture, in violation of 21 U.S.C . §§ 841( a)(1) and 853. On appeal, counsel has filed a brief pursuant t o And ers v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), suggesting that the distric t cour t erred by denying Day a three-level reduction for acceptance o f responsibility. We affirm. Day's recommended Guidelines sentencing range was 78 to 97 months ' imprisonment. At sentencing, the dis trict court granted the government's 1 downwa rd-departure motion under U.S.S.G. § 5K1.1, p.s., and 18 U.S.C . § 3553(e), and senten cing Day to 30 months' imprisonment and three years' supervised release. Because Day's sentence represents a downward departur e fromthe Guidelines sentencing range that would result even if she wer e granted the

### In an y event, we note that Day's use of amphetamine an d 2 

### methamphetamine while on bond was a proper basis to deny th e acceptance-of-responsibility reduction. See United States v . Poplawski , 46 F.3d 42, 43 (8th Cir.), cert. denied , 115 S. C t. 2261 (1995). -2- acceptance-of-responsibility reduction, we conclude that her sentence is unr eviewable. See United States v. Baker , 64 F.3d 439, 441 (8th Cir . 1995); United States v. Wyatt , 26 F.3d 863, 864 (8th Cir. 1994) (pe r curiam). 2
In acc ordance with Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), we hav e revie wed the record to look for any nonfrivolous issues and have foun d none. The judgment is affirmed. A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
ARTICLES OF ORGANIZATION



 Exhibit 4.9 
 AMENDED AND RESTATED 
 ARTICLES OF ORGANIZATION 
 OF 
 ACCESS DIABETIC SUPPLY, L.L.C.

 (Document # L00000002430) 
 The Articles of Organization of Access Diabetic Supply, L.L.C. (the “Company”) were filed on March 2, 2000. In accordance with Section 608.411, these Amended and Restated Articles of Organization of Access Diabetic
Supply, L.L.C. have been duly executed and are being filed to amend and restate in their entirety all prior articles of organization filed on behalf of the Company. The Company’s Amended and Restated Articles of Organization are as follows:

 ARTICLE I 
 The name of
this limited liability company shall be: Access Diabetic Supply, L.L.C. 
 ARTICLE II 
 The mailing address and the street address of the principal office of the limited liability company shall be 2101 NW 33rd Street, Suite 2000, Pompano
Beach, Florida 33069, with the privilege of having its offices and branch offices at other places within or without the State of Florida. 
 ARTICLE III 
 The registered office of this limited liability company is 2101 NW 33rd Street, Suite 2000, Pompano Beach,
Florida 33069. The registered agent at that address is David A. Wallace. 
 ARTICLE IV 
 The Company is authorized to issue 50,000,000 shares of membership interest, which shares shall evidence the interests of the members of the Company, and
which shares shall be designated either “Member Shares” or “Units” (which terms may be used interchangeably). The interests of the members of the Company shall be evidenced by the Membership Certificate issued by the Company
setting forth the number of Member Shares or Units issued and outstanding in the name of such member. 







 ARTICLE V 
 This limited liability company shall be a manager-managed company. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has
executed these Amended and Restated Articles of Organization this 30th day of July, 2003. 
  

	
	
	 /s/ David A. Wallace

	 David A. Wallace, Manager
EXHIBIT 21

ANDREW CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
List of Significant Subsidiaries

Significant subsidiaries of the registrant, all of which are wholly owned unless otherwise indicated, are as follows:

|Name of Subsidiary                        | Jurisdiction
of Incorporation
|----------------------------------------- | -----------------------------
|Andrew A.B                                | Sweden                       
|Andrew AG                                 | Switzerland                  
|Andrew AO                                 | Russia                       
|Andrew Canada, Inc                        | Canada                       
|Andrew Communications Oy                  | Finland                      
|Andrew Corporation (Mexico), S.A. de C.V  | Mexico                       
|Andrew Espana, S.A                        | Spain                        
|Andrew GmbH                               | Germany                      
|Andrew Industria e Comercio, Ltda.        | Brazil                       
|Andrew Kommunikationssysteme AG           | Switzerland                  
|Andrew Satcom Africa (Pty.) Ltd.          | South Africa                 
|Andrew S.A.R.L.                           | France                       
|Andrew S.R.L                              | Italy                        
|Andrew Telecommunications India Pvt. Ltd  | India                        
|Andrew Telecommunications (China) Co. Ltd | China                        
|Andrew International Corporation          | State of Illinois            
|Andrew Financial Services Corporation     | State of Delaware            
|Andrew Systems Inc.                       | State of Delaware            
|Andrew Passive Power Products Inc.        | State of Delaware            
|Andrew International Holding Corporation  | State of Delaware            
|Andrew International Corporation          | State of Delaware            
|Andrew New Zealand                        | State of Delaware            
|Micro Pulse Inc.                          | State of Delaware            

---

QuickLinks
Fiscal Year 2003 Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies - HAWAII

Maximum Required

Expenditures For 

Choice-Related Maximum Per-Child

Transportation Expenditure For

FY 2003 Title I And Supplemental Supplemental

LEA ID District Allocation* Educational Services** Educational Services***

1500001 Hawaii County 6,957,350 1,391,470 1,356.21

1500003 Honolulu County 24,446,171 4,889,234 1,399.96

1500005 Kalawao County 0 0 0.00

1500007 Kauai County 1,828,146 365,629 1,161.47

1500009 Maui County 2,862,837 572,567 1,035.38

1599999 PART D SUBPART 2 0 0 0.00

* Actual amounts received by LEAs will be smaller than shown here due to State-level adjustments to Federal Title I allocations. States adjust

 allocations, for example, to reflect LEA boundary changes or the creation of new LEAs, including charter school LEAs, that are not accounted

 for in the Department's calculations. States also are permitted to reserve up to 1 percent of allocations for administration and must reserve

 2 percent of allocations (rising to 4 percent in fiscal year 2004) for school improvement activities. These adjustments will reduce the actual

 amounts available under all three columns of the table.

** An LEA must use up to an amount equal to 20 percent of its Title I, Part A allocation (the “20-percent reservation”) received from the State 

 to cover choice-related transportation costs for students who exercise a choice option and to pay for supplemental educational services for

 students whose parents request such services. The 20-percent reservation may include Title I, Part A funds or funding from other Federal,

 State, local, and private sources. The amount shown in this column is the Department’s estimate of the amount that affected LEAs - those

 with schools identifed for improvement, corrective action, or restructuring - may have to spend to meet this requirement. Actual 

 expenditures will depend on such factors as the number of students exercising either a choice option or supplemental educuational services and

 the costs of satisfying these requests. An LEA has discretion to determine the allocation of these funds between choice-related transportation

 and supplemental educational services, except that it must spend at least one-quarter of the 20-percent reservation - or an amount equal to

 5 percent of its Title I, Part A allocation - on each activity if there is demand for both from students and their parents.

*** An LEA that must arrange for supplemental educational services is required to pay, for each child receiving services, the lesser of the actual cost

 of the services or an amount equal to the LEA’s Title I, Part A allocation received from the State divided by the number of poor students in the

 LEA, as determined by estimates produced by the US Bureau of the Census. Thus the amount shown in this column reflects the statutory “cap”

 on per-child expenditures for supplemental educational services.
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 17-630V
Filed: November 14, 2017

UNPUBLISHED

ELIZABETH HIEBERT,

Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent. Special Processing Unit (SPU); Ruling on Entitlement; Concession; Table Injury; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine; Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration (SIRVA)

John Robert Howie, Howie Law, PC, Dallas, TX, for petitioner. Lara Ann Englund, U.S. D epartment of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT 1

Dorsey , Chief Special Master:

On May 12, 2017, petitioner filed a petit ion for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.

, 2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffe red a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”) as a result of an influenza (“flu”) vaccination administered on October 8, 2014. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

On November 13, 2017, respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes that petitioner is entitled to compen sation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at 1. Specifically, respondent concluded that petitioner suffered a SIRVA.

1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reaso ned explanation for the action in this case, the undersigned intends to post it on the United States Cour t of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with

the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other inform ation, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, t he undersigned agrees that the identified material fits within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Ac t will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012).Id. at 4. Respondent further agrees that petitioner has sati sfied all legal prerequisites for compensation under the Vaccine Act. Id.

In view of respondent’s positio n and the evidence of record, the undersigned finds that petitioner is entitled to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Nora Beth Dorsey Nora Beth Dorsey Chief Special Master
Office of the Secretary – eff. 6/19/2022

Organization chart

Graphic Version 

(An accessible text version can be found on the following page.)
Accessible Text Version 

Office of the Secretary

Organization Chart

Effective 06/19/2022

• Secretary: Miguel Cardona

• Chief of Staff: Sheila Nix

• International Affairs Office: Maureen McLaughlin

• Deputy Chief of Staff for Strategy: Donna Harris-Aikens

• White House Liaison Office: Shannon Myricks

• Office of Management and Planning: Richard Smith

• Executive Office: LaVerne Chester

• Office of Events Management and Partnerships: Anya Hook

• Deputy Chief of Staff for Policy and Programs: Scott Sargrad 

• Executive Secretariat: Tracey St. Pierre

• Operations Team: Stephanie Williams

• Communications Teams: Sharon Cooke

• FOIA Service Center: Deborah Moore

• White House Initiatives
#### Kjellgren Realty Corporation, Appellant, v. Galop, Inc., et al., Respondents.

Motion to stay the execution of judgment pending determination of appeal, denied. Beldock, Acting P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld and Pette, JJ., concur; Christ, J., not voting.
### §5938. Repealed. Pub. L. 113–79, title VII, §7518, Feb. 7, 2014, 128 Stat. 904

Section, Pub. L. 110–234, title VII, §7529, May 22, 2008, 122 Stat. 1278; Pub. L. 110–246, §4(a), title VII, §7529, June 18, 2008, 122 Stat. 1664, 2040, related to agricultural and rural transportation research and education.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                     EXHIBIT 2.4


                             ACTION BY INCORPORATOR

                            POWER EXPLORATION, INC.

                       ---------------------------------

                              A Nevada Corporation


         The undersigned, being the Incorporator names in the Articles of
Incorporation of the above corporation, a Nevada corporation, does hereby adopt
the following resolutions:

          1. ADOPTION OF BY-LAWS.

         RESOLVED, that the By-Laws bearing the heading "By-Laws of POWER
EXPLORATION, INC." be and the same hereby are adopted as and for the By-Laws of
the corporation.

         RESOLVED FURTHER, that a copy of such By-Laws be inserted in the Book
of Minutes of the corporation.

          2. ELECTION OF OFFICERS.

         RESOLVED, that the following persons be and they hereby are elected as
officers of this corporation to hold the office or offices set forth opposite
their respective names until the first meeting of the Board of Directors
following the next annual meeting of shareholders of this corporation and until
their respective successors are elected and qualified or until their earlier
resignation or removal, such officers shall serve at the pleasure of the Board
of Directors of this corporation:

               OFFICE                       NAME
               ------                       ----

               President and CEO            Guy Pyron

               Vice-President and COO       Joe Bill Bennett

               Secretary and CFO            Mark S. Zouvas

               Treasurer                    Pattye Hill
<PAGE>   2
          3. ELECTION OF DIRECTORS.

         RESOLVED, that the following persons are hereby elected the Directors
of this corporation, to serve until the first annual meeting of the Directors of
the corporation and until their successors are elected and qualified or until
their earlier resignation or removal or their office is declared vacant in the
manner provided in the By-Laws of the corporation: M.O. RIFE, III, GUY PYRON,
JOE BILL BENNETT, JACK GALLACHER and THOM SCHLIEM.

          4. APPROVAL OF PLAN OF REORGANIZATION.

         RESOLVED, that the plan of reorganization and the change of situs as of
May 31, is hereby approved and/or authorized and a copy of which is attached.

DATED: May 31, 1998


/s/ MARK S. ZOUVAS
-----------------------------------
Mark S. Zouvas
Incorporator


ATTEST:


/s/ M.O. RIFE III
-----------------------------------
M.O. Rife, III
Chairman of the Board
### §2274a. Firearm authority of employees conducting field work in remote locations

On and after December 8, 2004, the Secretary of Agriculture is authorized to permit employees of the United States Department of Agriculture to carry and use firearms for personal protection while conducting field work in remote locations in the performance of their official duties.

(Pub. L. 108–447, div. A, title VII, §742, Dec. 8, 2004, 118 Stat. 2844.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in the following prior appropriation acts:

Pub.L. 108–199, div. A, title VII, §745, Jan. 23, 2004, 118 Stat. 37.

Pub.L. 108–7, div. A, title VII, §753, Feb. 20, 2003, 117 Stat. 45.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-51098 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus VICTOR MENDEZ-VALERA, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. DR-00-CR-199-ALL-WWJ

-------------------- August 21, 2002 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Court-appointed counsel for Victor Mendez-Valera has requested leave to withdraw as counsel and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Mendez-Valera has filed a pro se response. Our independent review of the record, counsel’s brief, and Mendez-Valera’s response discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED. Counsel is excused from further responsibilities, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR .No. 00-51098 -2- R. 42.2. Mendez-Valera’s motion for appointment of counsel is
DENIED.
#### STATE v. CONNELL

No. 551P97

Case below: 127 N.C.App. 685

Petition by Attorney General for writ of supersedeas and motion for temporary stay denied 4 December 1997.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

Office of Inspector General

The Inspector General

MEMORANDUM

TO: Assistant Inspector General for Audit

Assistant Inspector General for Investigation

Assistant Inspector General for Information Technology

 Audits and Computer Crime Investigations

Assistant Inspector General for Evaluation, Inspection, and

 Management Services

FROM: Inspector General

SUBJECT: Delegation of Authority to Enter Into Contracts and Other Agreements for 

Audits

I. DELEGATION

Under the authority vested in me by Section 3(a) of the Inspector General Act of 

1978, as amended (the Act), 5 U.S.C. Appendix 3, I hereby delegate to you, your 

successor in function, and anyone serving for you in an acting capacity, the 

authority under Section 6(a)(9) of the Act to enter into contracts and other 

arrangements for audits, studies, analyses, and other services as necessary to carry 

out the Office of Inspector General’s responsibilities relating to Department of 

Education’s programs and operations.

II. RESERVATION

The authority for obligation of OIG funds for such agreements is reserved to the 

Assistant Inspector General for Evaluation, Inspection, and Management Services.

III. REDELEGATION

This authority may not be redelegated.
IV. CERTIFICATE AND EFFECTIVE DATE

This delegation is effective upon certification by the Department’s Principal 

Delegations Control Officer and supersedes all previous delegations of this 

authority.

___________/s/_______________ 

 John P. Higgins, Jr.

OGC Clearance and Date: /s/ David Berthiaume, 8/3/2004

Certified Date: 8/3/2004

Departmental Delegations Control Officer: /s/ Naty G. Beetle

Control No.: EF/EFI/160
#### 1252.242-72 Dissemination of Contract Information.

As prescribed in 1242.270(c), insert the following clause:

# Dissemination of Contract Information (NOV 2022)

The Contractor shall not publish, permit to be published, or distribute for public consumption, any information, oral or written, concerning the results or conclusions made pursuant to the performance of this contract, without the prior written consent of the Contracting Officer. Two copies of any material proposed to be published or distributed shall be submitted to the Contracting Officer.

(End of clause)