alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-7152

JOHN HENRY JOHNSON,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

JOSEPH M. BROOKS, B.O.P., Warden,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge.

(CA-01-292-3)

Submitted: October 4, 2001 Decided: October 12, 2001

Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John Henry Johnson, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* The claim under Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000),

lacks merit because Johnson’s 220-month sentence is less than the

maximum sentence authorized under 21 U.S.C.A. § 841(b)(1)(C) (West

Supp. 2001). See United States v. Promise, 255 F.3d 150, 156 (4th

Cir. 2001) (en banc).

2

PER CURIAM:

John Henry Johnson appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition. We have reviewed

the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially on the reasoning of

the district court. Johnson v. Brooks, No. CA-01-292-3 (E.D. Va.

July 3, 2001).* We grant the motion for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000033113
<NAME> ENVIRONMENTAL TECTONICS CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> US$

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-25-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-26-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-26-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           1,259
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,205
<ALLOWANCES>                                       365
<INVENTORY>                                      5,172
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                29,955
<PP&E>                                          11,597
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,135
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  35,427
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,679
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           354
<OTHER-SE>                                      17,377
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    35,427
<SALES>                                          7,157
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 7,157
<CGS>                                            3,802
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,522
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (21)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 192
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,351
<INCOME-TAX>                                       467
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                882
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       882
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.12





</TABLE>
#### STATE v. CONNELL

No. 551P97

Case below: 127 N.C.App. 685

Petition by Attorney General for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 5 February 1998.
EXHIBIT 13.7



CONSENT OF EXPERT



We hereby consent to the use of our name contained in the technical report on the Bralorne Project, BC, Canada with an effective date of October 20, 2016, and the reference as an expert contained in the Annual Report of Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 and incorporated by reference to the Company’s Registration Statements on Form S-8 (SEC File No.: 333-195120), Form F-3 (SEC File Nos.: 333-193471 and 333-195144) and Form F-10 (SEC File No.: 333-214396).





|                      |     |                     | 
|--------------------- | --- | ------------------- | 
|Dated: March 10, 2017 | By: | /s/ Jasman Yee      | 
|                      |     | Jasman Yee, P. Eng. |
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential. 

# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________ ACTIVE NETWORK, LLC, Plaintiff

- Appellant

v.

UNITED STATES, BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON, INC., Defendants

- Appellees

______________________

2017

- 2135

______________________ Appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims in No. 1:16

- cv

- 01071

- TCW, Judge Thomas C. Wheeler.

______________________
JUDGMENT

______________________

E RIC J. M ARCOTTE , Vedder Price PC, Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff

- appellant. Also represented by K ELLY E. B UROKER , T AMARA D ROUBI ; D ANIEL R UBEN F ORMAN , J AMES G. P EYSTER , Crowell & Moring, LLP, Washington, DC.

M OLLIE L ENORE F INNAN , Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, argued for defendant -appelleeUnited States. Also represented by C HAD A. R EADLER , R OBERT E. K IRSCHMAN , J R ., D OUGLAS K. M ICKLE

.

M ARK C OLLEY , Arnorld & Porter Kaye Scholer, LLP, Washington, DC, argued for defendant

- appellee Booz Allen Hamilton, Inc. Also represented by A MANDA J. S HERWOOD , S TUART T URNER

.

______________________

T HIS C AUSE having been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (R EYNA , B RYSON , and S TOLL , Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED

. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

April 9, 2018 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court
### §7753. Reimbursable agreements

#### (a) Authority to enter into agreements

The Secretary may enter into reimbursable fee agreements with persons for preclearance of plants, plant products, biological control organisms, and articles at locations outside the United States for movement into the United States.

#### (b) Funds collected for preclearance

Funds collected for preclearance shall be credited to accounts which may be established by the Secretary for this purpose and shall remain available until expended for the preclearance activities without fiscal year limitation.

#### (c) Payment of employees

#### (1) In general

Notwithstanding any other law, the Secretary may pay employees of the Department of Agriculture performing services relating to imports into and exports from the United States, for all overtime, night, or holiday work performed by them, at rates of pay established by the Secretary.

#### (2) Reimbursement of the Secretary

#### (A) In general

The Secretary may require persons for whom the services are performed to reimburse the Secretary for any sums of money paid by the Secretary for the services.

#### (B) Use of funds

All funds collected under this paragraph shall be credited to the account that incurs the costs and shall remain available until expended without fiscal year limitation.

#### (d) Late payment penalties

#### (1) Collection

Upon failure to reimburse the Secretary in accordance with this section, the Secretary may assess a late payment penalty, and the overdue funds shall accrue interest, as required by section 3717 of title 31.

#### (2) Use of funds

Any late payment penalty and any accrued interest shall be credited to the account that incurs the costs and shall remain available until expended without fiscal year limitation.

(Pub. L. 106–224, title IV, §433, June 20, 2000, 114 Stat. 452.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of functions of the Secretary of Agriculture relating to agricultural import and entry inspection activities under this chapter to the Secretary of Homeland Security, and for treatment of related references, see sections 231, 551(d), 552(d), and 557 of Title 6, Domestic Security, and the Department of Homeland Security Reorganization Plan of November 25, 2002, as modified, set out as a note under section 542 of Title 6.
### §401. Establishment of bureau

There is established in the Department of Agriculture a bureau to be known as the "Bureau of Dairy Industry."

(May 29, 1924, ch. 208, §1, 43 Stat. 243; May 11, 1926, ch. 286, 44 Stat. 499.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

"Bureau of Dairying" established by act May 29, 1924, designated "Bureau of Dairy Industry" by act May 11, 1926.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

Functions of Bureau of Dairy Industry transferred to Secretary of Agriculture by 1947 Reorg. Plan No. 1, §301, eff. July 1, 1947, 12 F.R. 4534, 61 Stat. 952. See note set out under section 391 of this title.

Bureau of Dairy Industry consolidated with other agencies into Agricultural Research Administration for duration of World War II by Ex. Ord. No. 9069, Feb. 23, 1942, 7 F.R. 1409.
EXHIBIT 10.4

Summary of Non-Employee Director Compensation

For Service on the Board of Directors of Esterline
Technologies Corporation



|                                                                              |  |   |       
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | - | ------
|Compensation Paid to Non-Employee Directors                                   |  |   |       
|                                                                              | 
|Annual retainer                                                               |  | $ | 30,000
|Attendance (in person) at Board meeting (per meeting fee)                     |  | $ | 1,500 
|Attendance (by phone) at Board meeting (per meeting fee)                      |  | $ | 750   
|Annual issuance of fully-paid Common Stock                                    |  | $ | 60,000
|                                                                              | 
|Compensation for Attendance at Committee Meetings (in person or by telephone) |  |   |       
|                                                                              | 
|Attendance (in person) at Committee meeting (per meeting fee)                 |  | $ | 1,500 
|Attendance (by phone) at Committee meeting (per meeting fee)                  |  | $ | 750   
|                                                                              | 
|Additional Compensation for Committee Chairpersons                            |  |   |       
|                                                                              | 
|Audit Committee                                                               |  | $ | 12,500
|Compensation Committee                                                        |  | $ | 7,500 
|All Other Committees                                                          |  | $ | 5,000 
|                                                                              | 
|Additional Compensation for the Lead Independent Director                     |  | $ | 25,000
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

Functional Statements > Office of Postsecondary Education

## OPE Functional Statements

                - OPE Introduction
                - OPE Immediate Office
                - Higher Education Programs
                - Policy, Planning and Innovation
                - International and Foreign Language Education

## OPE Organizational Structure

                - OPE Organization Chart    (168KB, PDF)

## OPE Delegations of Authority

OPE Delegations of  Authority may be found at http://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/or/delegations/ope.html

----

 

 Printable view

## How Do I Find...

          - Student loans, forgiveness
          - Higher Education Rulemaking
          - College accreditation
          - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
          - FERPA
          - FAFSA
          - 1098, tax forms

More >

## Information About...

          - Elevating Teaching
          - Early Learning
          - Engage Every Student
          - Unlocking Career Success
          - Cybersecurity

 

----

*Our mission*

Student Loans
Repaying LoansDefaulted LoansLoan ForgivenessLoan Servicers

Grants & Programs
Apply for Pell GrantsGrants ForecastApply for a Grant

Laws & Guidance
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)FERPACivil RightsNew IDEA Website

Data & Research
Education StatisticsPostsecondary Education DataED Data ExpressNation's Report CardWhat Works ClearinghouseOpen Data PlatformCOVID Relief Data

About Us
Contact UsED OfficesJobsPress ReleasesFAQsRecursos en españolBudget, PerformancePrivacy Program

----

          - Notices
          - FOIA
          - Privacy Policy
          - Accessibility
          - Security
          - Information quality
          - Inspector General
          - Whitehouse.gov
          - USA.gov
          - Benefits.gov
          - Regulations.gov
          - vote.gov
#### 1002.70 Abbreviations.

*BCPO* Bureau Chief Procurement Officer

*COR* Contracting Officer's Representative

*HCA* Head of the Contracting Activity

*IPP* Invoice Processing Platform

*OPE* Office of the Procurement Executive

*OSDBU* Office of Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization

*SPE* Senior Procurement Executive

[76 FR 42057, July 18, 2011, as amended at 77 FR 40304, July 9, 2012; 80 FR 11595, Mar. 3, 2015]
```

                                                                   EXHIBIT 99(i)

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report  of Eagle  Exploration  Company  and
subsidiaries  (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2002 as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"), I, Raymond N. Joeckel,  Director,  Principal Executive and Accounting
and Financial  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  section
1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that:  (1) The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                     /s/ Raymond N. Joeckel
                                     ----------------------
                                     Raymond N. Joeckel,
                                     Director, Principal Executive and
                                     Accounting and Financial Officer

Officer Dated: August 16, 2002
```
§ 855.20 Joint-use agreements. An agreement between the Air Force and a local Government agency is required before a community can establish a public airport on an Air Force airfield. ( a ) Joint use of an Air Force airfield will be considered only if there will be no cost to the Air Force and no compromise of mission capability, security, readiness, safety, or quality of life. Further, only proposals submitted by authorized representatives of local Government agencies eligible to sponsor a public airport will be given the comprehensive evaluation required to conclude a joint use agreement. All reviewing levels will consider and evaluate such requests on an individual basis.
( b ) Generally, the Air Force is willing to consider joint use at an airfield if it does not have pilot training, nuclear storage, or a primary mission that requires a high level of security. Civil operations must begin within 5 years of the effective date of an agreement. Operational considerations will be based on the premise that military aircraft will receive priority handling (except in emergencies), if traffic must be adjusted or resequenced. The Air Force normally will not consider personnel increases solely to support civil operations but, if accommodated, all costs must be fully reimbursed by the joint-use sponsor. The Air Force will not provide personnel to install, operate, maintain, alter, or relocate navigation equipment or aircraft arresting systems for the sole use of civil aviation. Changes in equipment or systems to support the civil operations must be funded by the joint-use sponsor. The Air Force must approve siting, design, and construction of the civil facilities.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated statement of income and the consolidated balance sheet and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         113,452
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  132,456
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,891
<INVENTORY>                                     86,913
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               344,880
<PP&E>                                         461,096
<DEPRECIATION>                                 302,378
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 612,437
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           77,630
<BONDS>                                         81,898
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        13,906
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,683,414)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   612,437
<SALES>                                        660,108
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               660,108
<CGS>                                          550,728
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  614,092
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,398
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                548,093
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,668
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            542,425
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   542,425
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    49.13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    49.13
        

</TABLE>
From: Higgins, Cortney [mailto:Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov]

Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2014 1:34 PM

To: Wayland, Robertj

Subject: RE: Wednesday Meeting with DOE

DOE has a meeting that can’t be moved from 2-5 to morrow. Are you all still available from 1-2 tomorrow? I am available at that time, and if we do a call we’ll just get who we get from the EOP.

From: Wayland, Robertj [mailto:Wayland.Robertj@epa.gov]

Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2014 1:27 PM

To: Higgins, Cortney

Subject: Re: Wednesday Meeting with DOE

Kevin asks if we can do 4:30-5:30 tomorrow on a call instead of 5-6?

thanx!

bob

Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone on the Verizon Wireless 4G LTE network.

From: Higgins, Cortney [mailto:Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov]

Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2014 1:20 PM

To: Wayland, Robertj

Subject: RE: Wednesday Meeting with DOE

Hi Bob,

What time(s) on Friday works on your end? Is it still the same as it was earlier this week?

Regards, CortneyFrom: Wayland, Robertj [mailto:Wayland.Robertj@epa.gov]

Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2014 1:16 PM

To: Higgins, Cortney

Subject: Re: Wednesday Meeting with DOE

Kevin doesn't want to do it at all tomorrow to focus on the redline that's coming back to you. I think we can get critical mass on the phone, it just likely will not include Kevin.

thanx!

bob

Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone on the Verizon Wireless 4G LTE network.

From: Higgins, Cortney [mailto:Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov]

Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2014 1:13 PM

To: Wayland, Robertj

Subject: RE: Wednesday Meeting with DOE

Hi Bob,

Some of the key folks from the EOP are out on Friday – so it’s best to have the discussion on Wednesday. Would it be better to do it as a call?

Thanks, Cortney

From: Wayland, Robertj [mailto:Wayland.Robertj@epa.gov]

Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2014 10:49 AM

To: Higgins, Cortney

Subject: Re: Wednesday Meeting with DOE

Kevin would like to move the Wed meeting to Friday. Do you or DOE have any concerns with that approach? Obviously those issues will NOT be dealt with in the redline version for tmrw/Thurs. Just let me know your wishes.thanx!

bob

Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone on the Verizon Wireless 4G LTE network.
Exhibit 10.1

                      LUNA TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL, INC.
                                61B Fawcett Road
                           Coquitlam, British Columbia
                                 Canada V3K 6V2

                                                        April 7, 2006

AJW Partners, LLC
AJW Offshore, Ltd.
AJW Qualified Partners, LLC
New Millennium Capital Partners II, LLC
1044 Northern Boulevard
Suite 302
Roslyn, New York 11576

         Re:      LUNA TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL, INC.

Ladies and Gentlemen:

         Reference is made to the Securities Purchase Agreement (the "Purchase
Agreement") dated as of December 16, 2005 by and among Luna Technologies
International, Inc. and each of AJW Partners, LLC, AJW Offshore, Ltd., AJW
Qualified Partners, LLC, and New Millennium Capital Partners II, LLC.

         1. The Purchase Agreement is hereby amended to delete therefrom
Sections 8(g) and 8(h) of the Purchase Agreement.

         2. All other provisions of the Purchase Agreement shall remain in full
force and effect.

         The parties shall do and perform, or cause to be done and performed,
all such further acts and things, and shall execute and deliver all such other
agreements, certificates, instruments and documents, as the other parties hereto
may reasonably request in order to carry out the intent and accomplish the
purposes of this letter agreement.

                                   Very truly yours,

                                   Luna Technologies International, Inc.

                                   By: /s/ Kimberly Landry
                                       Kimberly Landry

ACCEPTED AND AGREED:

AJW PARTNERS, LLC
By:  SMS GROUP, LLC


<PAGE>


/s/ Corey S. Ribotsky
-----------------------------------
Corey S. Ribotsky, Manager


NEW MILLENNIUM CAPITAL PARTNERS II, LLC
By: FIRST STREET MANAGER II, LLC,


/s/ Corey S. Ribotsky
-----------------------------------
Corey S. Ribotsky, Manager


AJW OFFSHORE, LTD.
By: FIRST STREET MANAGER II, LLC


/s/ Corey S. Ribotsky
-----------------------------------
Corey S. Ribotsky, Manager


AJW QUALIFIED PARTNERS, LLC
By: AJW MANAGER, LLC


/s/ Corey S. Ribotsky
-----------------------------------
Corey S. Ribotsky, Manager
No. 703.

#### Rome Lane, on Behalf of Himself and Others *v.*Equitable Trust Company of New York.

March 8, 1920.

*Mr. Wells H. Blodgett*and *Mr. Clifford B. Allen*for petitioner.

*Mr. G. W. Murray*and *Mr. Lawrence Greer*for respondent.

Petition for a writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.