alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER>  1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           6,121
<SECURITIES>                                       155
<RECEIVABLES>                                   26,204
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,531
<INVENTORY>                                     23,917
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                58,194
<PP&E>                                           8,001
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,546
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  83,460
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           38,665
<BONDS>                                         20,750
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      9,000
<COMMON>                                           403
<OTHER-SE>                                      14,256
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    83,460
<SALES>                                        151,284
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               151,284
<CGS>                                          145,354
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  145,354
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                18,825
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   795
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,525
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (16,215)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       194
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (16,409)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (16,409)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.42)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.42)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                              MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         13,654
<SECURITIES>                                        0         
<RECEIVABLES>                                  24,489
<ALLOWANCES>                                      618
<INVENTORY>                                    14,785
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               56,152 
<PP&E>                                         26,725
<DEPRECIATION>                                 11,692
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                104,224
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          31,289
<BONDS>                                        82,546
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          14,384<F2>
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                            0
<OTHER-SE>                                   (28,214)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  104,224
<SALES>                                        34,588 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               34,588
<CGS>                                          24,669         
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  24,669 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   17
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              2,371
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 2,218
<INCOME-TAX>                                      869
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             1,349
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0 
<NET-INCOME>                                    1,349
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       0<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0<F1>
<FN>
<F1> In accordance with SFAS No. 128, earnings per share is not required to be
     calculated.
<F2> Preferred stock-mandatory includes preferred stock units.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
§ 286h.4 Responsibilities. ( a ) The Under Secretary of Defense (Acquisition) shall be responsible for establishing uniform policies and procedures for the release of acquisition-related information.
( b ) The Under Secretary of Defense (Policy), Assistant Secretary of Defense (Program Analysis and Evaluation) and Comptroller, DoD are responsible for adjudicating requests for access to Planning, Programming and Budgeting information pertaining to their respective phases of the PPB system.
( c ) The Head of each DoD Component shall assure that procedures for the release of acquisition-related information are consistent with the policy contained in this Directive and shall not impose any additional restrictions on release of such information. These procedures shall specifically identify the individuals authorized to release and transmit acquisition-related information.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This Schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the Form
10-KSB of Kent Financial Services, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 1995 and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000316028
<NAME>                        KENT FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                  1000          
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                         8,259
<SECURITIES>                                   5,620 
<RECEIVABLES>                                  601
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               14,480
<PP&E>                                         2,093
<DEPRECIATION>                                 668
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 16,333
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2,391
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       105
<OTHER-SE>                                     12,747
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   16,333
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               12,345
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               9,790
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             406
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                2,149
<INCOME-TAX>                                   308
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            1,841
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1,841
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  1.73
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  1.73
        


</TABLE>
State of New York

Supreme Court, Appellate Division

Third Judicial Department

Decided and Entered: November 10, 2016 522443 

________________________________

In the Matter of TERRY LAWS, 

Petitioner, 

v MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT

NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF 

CORRECTIONAL SERVICES AND 

COMMUNITY SUPERVISION, 

Respondent.

________________________________

Calendar Date: September 20, 2016

Before: McCarthy, J.P., Egan Jr., Rose, Devine and Aarons, JJ.

__________

Terry Laws, Beacon, petitioner pro se.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J.

Mastracco of counsel), for respondent.

__________

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this

Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to

review a determination of the Commissioner of Corrections and

Community Supervision finding petitioner guilty of violating

certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with

unauthorized exchange and possession of gang-related material

after a correction officer observed petitioner pass something to

a fellow inmate which, following a frisk of both inmates, proved

to be informational materials regarding membership in a specified

gang. At the conclusion of a tier III disciplinary hearing,

petitioner was found guilty of both charges and, other than a

modification of the penalty imposed, that determination was
-2- 522443 

affirmed upon administrative appeal. This CPLR article 78

proceeding ensued. 

We confirm. Contrary to petitioner's contention, the

misbehavior report, gang-related material and testimony at the

hearing provide substantial evidence to support the determination

of guilt (see Matter of Canty v Prack, 122 AD3d 1054, 1054

[2014]; Matter of Kimbrough v Fischer, 96 AD3d 1256, 1257 [2012];

Matter of James v Poole, 52 AD3d 1083, 1084 [2008], lv denied 11

NY3d 710 [2008]). Although petitioner and the other inmate

involved denied that petitioner passed anything when they shook

hands, the correction officer who authored the misbehavior report

testified that he saw the other inmate place something in his

right front pocket after the handshake, which is where the gangrelated material was found during the frisk. In any event, any

conflicts or inconsistencies in the testimony presented a

credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve (see Matter

of Canty v Prack, 122 AD3d at 1055; Matter of Gioe v Selsky, 269

AD2d 644, 645 [2000]). We have reviewed petitioner's remaining

contentions and find them to be without merit. 

McCarthy, J.P., Egan Jr., Rose, Devine and Aarons, JJ.,

concur.

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without

costs, and petition dismissed.

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger

Clerk of the Court
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 248 (Monday, December 28, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Page 84358]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-28530]



[[Page 84358]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Notice of Closed 
Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute 
Special Emphasis Panel; Improving Oxygen Delivery.
    Date: January 22, 2021.
    Time: 12:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate contract proposals.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6705 Rockledge Drive, 
Bethesda, MD 20817 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Giuseppe Pintucci, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Office of Scientific Review/DERA, National Heart, Lung, and 
Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, 6705 Rockledge 
Drive, Room 205-H, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 827-7969, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e7b78e89939284848e80a7898f8b858ec9898e8fc9808891"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c999a0a7bdbcaaaaa0ae89a7a1a5aba0e7a7a0a1e7aea6bf">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.233, 
National Center for Sleep Disorders Research; 93.837, Heart and 
Vascular Diseases Research; 93.838, Lung Diseases Research; 93.839, 
Blood Diseases and Resources Research, National Institutes of 
Health, HHS)

    Dated: December 18, 2020.
David W. Freeman,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2020-28530 Filed 12-23-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### 1252.217-72 Performance.

As prescribed at 1217.7001(b), insert the following clause:

# Performance (NOV 2022)

(a) Upon the award of the contract, the Contractor shall promptly start the work specified and shall diligently prosecute the work to completion. The Contractor shall not start work until the contract has been awarded except in the case of emergency work ordered by the Contracting Officer in writing.

(b) The Government shall deliver the vessel described in the contract at the time and location specified in the contract. Upon completion of the work, the Government shall accept delivery of the vessel at the time and location specified in the contract.

(c) The Contractor shall without charge—

(1) Make available to personnel of the vessel while in dry dock or on a marine railway, sanitary lavatory and similar facilities at the plant acceptable to the Contracting Officer;

(2) Supply and maintain suitable brows and gangways from the pier, dry dock, or marine railway to the vessel;

(3) Treat salvage, scrap or other ship's material of the Government resulting from performance of the work as items of Government-furnished property, in accordance with clause 52.245-1, Government Property;

(4) Perform, or pay the cost of, any repair, reconditioning or replacement made necessary as the result of the use by the Contractor of any of the vessel's machinery, equipment or fittings, including, but not limited to, winches, pumps, rigging, or pipe lines; and

(5) Furnish suitable offices, office equipment and telephones at or near the site of the work for the Government's use.

(d) The contract will state whether dock and sea trials are required to determine whether the Contractor has satisfactorily performed the work.

(1) If dock and sea trials are required, the vessel shall be under the control of the vessel's commander and crew.

(2) The Contractor shall not conduct dock and sea trials not specified in the contract without advance approval of the Contracting Officer. Dock and sea trials not specified in the contract shall be at the Contractor's expense and risk.

(3) The Contractor shall provide and install all fittings and appliances necessary for dock and sea trials. The Contractor shall be responsible for care, installation, and removal of instruments and apparatus furnished by the Government for use in the trials.

(End of clause)
INDEX OF LETTERS OF SUPPORT

SET 2 of 2

1. JTB Hawaii, Inc. 

2. Activities & Attractions Association of Hawaii 

3. Kintetsu International Hawaii Company 

4. Kyo-ya Hotels & Resorts, LP 

5. The Ritz-Carlton Club and Residences, Kapalua Bay 

6. The Ritz-Carlton, Kapalua 

7. Hilton Hawaii 

8. Hotel Wailea 

9. Trump International Hotel – Waikiki Beach Walk 

10. Marriott International, Inc. 

11. Waikoloa Beach Marriott Resort & Spa 

12. Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide, Inc. 

13. Hyatt Regency Waikiki Beach Resort & Spa 

14. Destination Resorts Hawaii 

15. JW Marriott Ihilani Resort & Spa 

16. Wailea Beach Marriott Resort & Spa 

17. Sawayaka Hawaii, Inc. 

18. Tihati Productions, Ltd. 

19. USS Missouri Memorial Association 

20. Atlantis Adventures 

21. Panda Travel 

22. Sea Life Park Hawaii 

23. Pomare, Ltd. d/b/a Hilo Hattie – The Store of Hawaii 

24. Maui Divers of Hawaii, Ltd. 

25. Friends of Hawaii Charities, Inc. 

Docket OST-2010-0018 

Activities & Attractions Association of Hawaii 

PO Box 598, Makawao, Hawaii 96768 

(808)871-7947 Main (808)877-3104 Fax 

www.HawaiiFun.org www.Kamaaina.org www.BestGuidebookHawaii.com www.HawaiiThingstodo.com 

Secretary Ray LaHood 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

 February 22, 2010 

RE: DOT-OST-2010-0018; Application of Hawaiian Airlines -Haneda Combination Services 

Allocation Proceeding 

Aloha Honorable Secretary LaHood: 

Mahalo for this opportunity to communicate A3H͛s support of Hawaiian Airlines application for 

authority to serve Tokyo͛s Haneda Airport, my name is Toni Marie Davis. For the past 13 years it 

has been my honor to serve the activity & attraction industry of Hawaii through my position as 

the Executive Director of the Activities & Attractions Association of Hawaii, (A3H). A3H 

represents a collection of 179 premier ͞things to do͟ in the state. Our sector of the industry 

represents a conservative $2.4 billion in sales annually. 

Hawaii͛Ɛ activities & attractions are what make vacation memories. They are what visitors take 

pictures & tell stories of upon their return home. With the current Global economy maintaining 

a steady flow of visitors to our state is challenging. Achieving a visitor flows which includes high 

daily spending is becoming even more important as on average A3H members are experiencing 

30% downturn. 

Japanese travelers are among Hawaii͛ƐŵŽƐƚǀĂůƵĞĚƚƌĂǀĞůĞƌƐ due to their highest spending 

levels. ,ĂǁĂŝŝĂŶ͛ƐƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚŶĞǁĚĂŝůLJƐĞƌǀŝĐĞĨƌŽŵ,ĂŶĞĚĂǁŝůůŵĂŬĞ,ĂǁĂŝŝĂŶĞǀĞŶŵŽƌĞ

attractive destination for Japanese travelers͘LJĚĞƉĂƌƚŝŶŐĨƌŽŵdŽŬLJŽ͛ƐƉƌĞĨĞƌƌĞĚĂŝƌƉŽƌƚĂŶĚ

flying directly to Honolulu, travel to Hawaii will become more convenient and accessible. 

When Hawaii is a more attractive destination, all Hawaii businesses stand to benefit, including 

A3H members, their employees and vendors. Accordingly, we believe that the award of 

,ĂŶĞĚĂƐůŽƚƐƚŽ,ĂǁĂŝŝĂŶŝƌůŝŶĞƐŝƐŝŶƚŚĞƉƵďůŝĐŝŶƚĞƌĞƐƚĂŶĚƚŚĂƚ,ĂǁĂŝŝĂŶ͛ƐƉƉůŝĐĂƚŝŽŶ

should be granted without delay. 

Sincerely, 

Toni Marie Davis 

Toni Marie Davis
§ 776.26 Conflict of interest: General rule. ( a ) Except as provided by paragraph (b) of this section, a covered attorney shall not represent a client if the representation of that client involves a concurrent conflict of interest. A concurrent conflict of interest exists if: ( 1 ) The representation of one client will be directly adverse to another client; or
( 2 ) There is a significant risk that the representation of one or more clients will be materially limited by the covered attorney's responsibilities to another client, a former client or a third person or by a personal interest of the covered attorney.
( b ) Notwithstanding the existence of a concurrent conflict of interest under paragraph (a) of this section, a covered attorney may represent a client if: ( 1 ) The covered attorney reasonably believes that the covered attorney will be able to provide competent and diligent representation to each affected client;
( 2 ) The representation is not prohibited by law or regulation;
( 3 ) The representation does not involve the assertion of a claim by one client against another client represented by the covered attorney in the same litigation or other proceeding before a tribunal; and
( 4 ) Each affected client gives informed consent, confirmed in writing.
( c ) These conflict-of-interest rules apply to Reservists only while they are actually drilling or on active-duty-for-training, or, as is the case with Retirees, on extended active-duty or when performing other duties subject to JAG supervision. Therefore, unless otherwise prohibited by criminal conflict-of-interest statutes, Reserve or Retired attorneys providing legal services in their civilian capacity may represent clients, or work in firms whose attorneys represent clients, with interests adverse to the United States. Reserve judge advocates who, in their civilian capacities, represent persons whose interests are adverse to the DoN will provide written notification to their supervisory attorney and commanding officer, detailing their involvement in the matter. Reserve judge advocates shall refrain from undertaking any official action or representation of the DoN with respect to any particular matter in which they are providing representation or services to other clients.
#### 1201.105 Issuance.
#### Jean I. Rabinowitz, Respondent, v. Maurice S. Indursky, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously reversed, upon the law and upon the facts, the verdict vacated and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant. Defendant was entitled to a charge, as requested, that if the jury found that plaintiff was to give testimony in consideration for the percentage agreement, then such agreement was illegal and defendant was entitled to a verdict. Defendant was also entitled to a charge, as requested, that if the jury found that plaintiff had not made a disclosure to Harold Indursky of plaintiff’s financial interest in any settlement that then, too, the agreement would be an illegal one designed to exploit a confidential relationship and, in that event, defendant was entitled to a verdict. Apart from the failure to grant the requests to charge which requires a new trial, a new trial is also merited because the verdict is contrary to the weight of the credible evidence. There was insufficient to show that plaintiff caused or contributed to the settlement with Harold Indursky or that the agreement was as alleged and testified. On the contrary, the proof strongly suggests that plaintiff’s part in the family dispute was quite different from that which she testified. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, Stevens and Eager, JJ.
OFFICIAL NOTICE FROM COURT OFCRIMPWAL APPEALS OFTEXAS P.O. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711 

# OFFICIALBUSINESS,- % «rc»w»w o^*0^ STATE OF TP5f&«a z* 'B^ft;«'^^^^^ £(4 fTzSk-^^'^^^' FISUkSAIl "iPVIS/*=SltBl ' .V •>*&-' DSfirfvljisSS^ 3 ^V "^Ki±^' P1THEVBOWES

ISIftSALTY FOR /. t\ §xj^ fe$l||^§£ » lf»un) «*«»* 

## 1/7/2015 PRIVATE USE §-.,s %£:*|jgg|fi^ 0004279596 janosIois RARRFTD iQAAr tEL/^* 'fi*2** A^Pfellffii^ MAILED FROM ZIPCODE 78701 

### BAKKblO, ISAAC TK-Ct No^07918^A WR-82 606-01 

## The Court has dismissed yojfcaj^rajiDiftifdr writ of habeas corpus'without 

## written order for non-c^^^mMml Rules ofAppellate Procedure 

# art 11 07 Ca,ly' th^^^?\^°V^ "P^P^fescribedform per Abel Acosta, Clerk 

## The Court has dismissed youk^pfqajgjSfri$r writ of habeas corpus'without


# V^^PfARRETO 

# «gSSS»* .WTRAVIS CO. CORR. CEN

-TDC # 1431513 3614 BILL PRICE RD DEL VALUE, TX 78617 

### •E6N3B 7B£i7 ,lM,lMl,,,l,,ll'ill,l,,,l,,,,il,r,,llll,,l!,|,,,llll,l,lll,ll'
### §2279i. Cooperation with State and other agencies; expenditures

In carrying on the activities of the Department of Agriculture involving cooperation with State, county, and municipal agencies, associations of farmers, individual farmers, universities, colleges, boards of trade, chambers of commerce, or other local associations of business men, business organizations, and individuals within the State, Territory, district, or insular possession in which such activities are to be carried on, moneys contributed from such outside sources, except in the case of the authorized activities of the Forest Service, shall be paid only through the Secretary of Agriculture or through State, county, or municipal agencies, or local farm bureaus or like organizations, cooperating for the purpose with the Secretary of Agriculture.

(July 24, 1919, ch. 26, 41 Stat. 270.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 450b of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section, and to section 563 of Title 5 prior to the general revision and enactment of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees, by Pub. L. 89–554, §1, Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 378.