alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 609 

To amend the Department of Veterans Affairs Health Care Programs Enhancement Act of 2001 and title 38, United States Code, to require 

the provision of chiropractic care and services to veterans at all Department of Veterans Affairs medical centers and to expand access to such 

care and services, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 13, 2017 

Mr. MORAN (for himself, Mr. BLUMENTHAL, Mr. GRASSLEY, Ms. MURKOWSKI, Mr. WHITEHOUSE, Ms. BALDWIN, Mr. BROWN, Mr. TESTER, 

and Mr. KING) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend the Department of Veterans Affairs Health Care 

Programs Enhancement Act of 2001 and title 38, United 

States Code, to require the provision of chiropractic care 

and services to veterans at all Department of Veterans 

Affairs medical centers and to expand access to such 

care and services, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Chiropractic Care 

5 Available to All Veterans Act of 2017’’. 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 609 IS

1 SEC. 2. PROGRAM FOR PROVISION OF CHIROPRACTIC 

2 CARE AND SERVICES TO VETERANS. 

3 Section 204(c) of the Department of Veterans Affairs 

4 Health Care Programs Enhancement Act of 2001 (Public 

5 Law 107–135; 38 U.S.C. 1710 note) is amended— 

6 (1) by inserting ‘‘(1)’’ before ‘‘The program’’; 

7 and 

8 (2) by adding at the end the following new 

9 paragraph: 

10 ‘‘(2) The program shall be carried out at not fewer 

11 than 75 medical centers by not later than December 31, 

12 2018, and at all medical centers by not later than Decem13 ber 31, 2020.’’. 

14 SEC. 3. EXPANDED CHIROPRACTOR SERVICES AVAILABLE 

15 TO VETERANS. 

16 (a) MEDICAL SERVICES.—Paragraph (6) of section 

17 1701 of title 38, United States Code, is amended by add18 ing at the end the following new subparagraph: 

19 ‘‘(H) Chiropractic services.’’. 

20 (b) REHABILITATIVE SERVICES.—Paragraph (8) of 

21 such section is amended by inserting ‘‘chiropractic,’’ after 

22 ‘‘counseling,’’. 

23 (c) PREVENTIVE HEALTH SERVICES.—Paragraph 

24 (9) of such section is amended— 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 609 IS

1 (1) by redesignating subparagraphs (F) 

2 through (K) as subparagraphs (G) through (L), re3 spectively; and 

4 (2) by inserting after subparagraph (E) the fol5 lowing new subparagraph (F): 

6 ‘‘(F) periodic and preventive chiropractic 

7 examinations and services;’’. 

Æ 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### Burke Bronstein, Appellant, v. Dayton Peninsula Corp. et al., Respondents.

In an action for specific performance of an alleged contract for the sale of real property, plaintiff appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered November 16, 1959, as denies his motion to strike out the first defense (Statute of Frauds) and the fifth defense and counterclaim on the ground that they are insufficient in law. Order modified by striking out its ordering paragraph and by substituting therefor: (1) a paragraph directing that the fifth defense and counterclaim alleged in defendants’ answer be struck out; and (2) a paragraph directing that in all other respects the motion be denied, without costs. As so modified, order insofar as appealed from affirmed, without costs. The fifth defense and counterclaim alleges that the corporate defendant owned the real property which is the subject of the contract alleged in the complaint; that it entered into a written agreement for the sale of said property to Candía Realty Corp.; that on the day preceding the closing date of said contract, plaintiff caused to be filed a notice of pendency of this action, based on his verified complaint alleging a pre-existing oral agreement for the conveyance of the property by defendants to plaintiff; that the plaintiff knew that there was no legal justification on his part for instituting an action for specific performance against defendants; that plaintiff’s act in filing the notice of pendency was willful, malicious and not legally justifiable; that it was calculated to and did prevent the conveyance to Candía; that it was intended to prevent the defendants from realizing a just and fair profit from such sale; and that it was motivated by an unlawful intent to realize such profit for himself. The facts pleaded in the fifth defense and counterclaim are insufficient to constitute a defense or a cause of action in favor of defendants against plaintiff. If plaintiff did not commit an actionable tort in instituting and prosecuting this action, he may not be cast in damages for exercising his legal right to file a notice of the pendency of the action, unless the notice was used for some purpose other than that permitted by law *(Hauser*v. *Bartow,*2,73 N. Y. 370).' It is not alleged in defendants’ counterclaim that there was any such misuse of the notice. On the other hand, if this action was commenced and prosecuted by plaintiff maliciously and without probable cause, there may be no recovery against him therefor unless and until this action has terminated in a manner not unfavorable to defendants *(Sigl*v. *Bresnahan,*216 App. Div. 634; *Ametco, Ltd.,*v. *Beltehev,*5 A D 2d 631, affd. 7 N Y 2d 783). Nor may the pleading be sustained as one to recover damages for a prima facie tort (ef. *Burn*v. *Bum,*286 App. Div. 767; *Bono Sawdust Supply Go.*v. *Hahn*<£■ *Golin,*3 A D 2d 221; *Porterfield*v. *Saffan,*7 A D 2d 987, affd. 7 N Y 2d 816; *Brandt*v. *Winehell,*286 App. Div. 249, 250). The motion to strike out the first defense was properly denied. Nolan, P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur.
August 18, 2015

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

IN THE INTEREST OF T.E.A., A CHILD

NO. 14-15-00349-CV 

________________________________

Today the Court heard its own motion to dismiss the appeal from the 

judgment signed by the court below on March 6, 2015. Having considered the 

motion and found it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED.

We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by 

appellant, In the Interest of T.E.A., a Child.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 5 (Friday, January 8, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1525-1526]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-00103]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

JUDICIAL CONFERENCE OF THE UNITED STATES


Advisory Committee on Criminal Rules; Hearing of the Judicial 
Conference

AGENCY: Judicial Conference of the United States, Advisory Committee on

[[Page 1526]]

the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.

ACTION: Notice of cancellation of open hearing.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The following remote public hearing on proposed amendments to 
the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure has been canceled: Criminal 
Rules Hearing on January 25, 2021.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rebecca A. Womeldorf, Secretary, 
Committee on Rules of Practice and Procedure of the Judicial Conference 
of the United States, Thurgood Marshall Federal Judiciary Building, One 
Columbus Circle NE, Suite 7-300, Washington, DC 20544, Telephone (202) 
502-1820, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7b290e171e0838141616120f0f1e1e24281e18091e0f1a09023b1a14550e0818140e090f08551c140d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="97c5e2fbf2e4d4f8fafafee3e3f2f2c8c4f2f4e5f2e3f6e5eed7f6f8b9e2e4f4f8e2e5e3e4b9f0f8e1">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Announcements for this hearing were 
previously published in 85 FR 48562.

    Authority: 28 U.S.C. 2073.

    Dated: January 4, 2021.
Rebecca A. Womeldorf,
Chief Counsel, Rules Committee Staff.
[FR Doc. 2021-00103 Filed 1-7-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 2210-55-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 21



ANDREW CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

List of
Significant Subsidiaries



Significant subsidiaries of
the registrant, all of which are wholly-owned, are as follows:



|                                                      |  |                              
|----------------------------------------------------- |  | -----------------------------
|Name of Subsidiary                                    |  | Jurisdiction of Incorporation
|Andrew Australia Pty Ltd                              |  | Australia                    
|Andrew do Brazil, Ltda.                               |  | Brazil                       
|Andrew Canada Inc.                                    |  | Canada                       
|Andrew Broadband Telecommunications (Yantai) Co. Ltd. |  | China                        
|Andrew Telecommunications (China) Co. Ltd.            |  | China                        
|Forem China (Shenzhen) Co. Ltd.                       |  | China                        
|Andrew Telecommunications s.r.o.                      |  | Czech Republic               
|Andrew S.A.R.L.                                       |  | France                       
|Andrew GmbH                                           |  | Germany                      
|Mikom GmbH                                            |  | Germany                      
|Andrew Hong Kong Ltd.                                 |  | Hong Kong                    
|Andrew Telecommunications India Pvt. Ltd.             |  | India                        
|Andrew Telecommunication Products Srl                 |  | Italy                        
|Andrew Japan KK                                       |  | Japan                        
|Andrew Corporation S.A. de C.V.                       |  | Mexico                       
|Andrew Limited                                        |  | United Kingdom               
|Andrew Satcom Africa (Pty.) Ltd.                      |  | South Africa                 
|Andrew Amplifiers Inc.                                |  | State of Delaware            
|Andrew International Holding Corporation              |  | State of Delaware            
|Andrew Systems Inc.                                   |  | State of Delaware            
|Allen Telecom LLC                                     |  | State of Delaware            
|Andrew International Corporation                      |  | State of Illinois            
|Allen Telecom Sweden, AB                              |  | Sweden                       
|Andrew AG                                             |  | Switzerland                  
|Andrew Corporation Taiwan                             |  | Taiwan
### §§541 to 545. Repealed. Aug. 13, 1946, ch. 957, title XI, §1131(56), 60 Stat. 1039

Sections 541 to 545, act June 5, 1930, ch. 399, 46 Stat. 497–499, related to Foreign Agricultural Service.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective three months following Aug. 13, 1946, see section 1141 of act Aug. 13, 1946, ch. 957, title XI, 60 Stat. 1040.
#### AMMONS v. COUNTY OF WAKE

No. 493P97

Case below: 127 N.C.App. 426

Petition by plaintiffs for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 5 March 1998.
No.-, Original.

#### *Ex parte:*In the Matter of James F. Bishop, Administrator, etc., Petitioner.

Motion for leave to file a petition for a writ of prohibition herein submitted March 1, 1920.

Denied March 8, 1920.

*Mr. Harry W. Standidge*for petitioner.
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 142 

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Agriculture in 

the One Hundred Eighteenth Congress. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 17, 2023 

Mr. THOMPSON of Pennsylvania submitted the following resolution; which was 

referred to the Committee on House Administration 

RESOLUTION 

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on 

Agriculture in the One Hundred Eighteenth Congress. 

1 Resolved, 

2 SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES. 

3 For the expenses of the Committee on Agriculture 

4 (hereafter in this resolution referred to as the ‘‘Com5 mittee’’), including the expenses of all staff salaries, there 

6 shall be paid, out of the applicable accounts of the House 

7 of Representatives for committee salaries and expenses, 

8 not more than $14,193,788 for the One Hundred Eight9 eenth Congress. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HRES 142 IH 

1 SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS. 

2 Of the amount specified in section 1— 

3 (1) not more than $7,096,894 shall be available 

4 for expenses incurred during the period beginning at 

5 noon on January 3, 2023, and ending immediately 

6 before noon on January 3, 2024; and 

7 (2) not more than $7,096,894 shall be available 

8 for expenses incurred during the period beginning at 

9 noon on January 3, 2024, and ending immediately 

10 before noon on January 3, 2025. 

11 SEC. 3. VOUCHERS. 

12 Payments under this resolution shall be made on 

13 vouchers authorized by the Committee, signed by the 

14 Chairman of the Committee, and approved in the manner 

15 directed by the Committee on House Administration. 

16 SEC. 4. REGULATIONS. 

17 Amounts made available under this resolution shall 

18 be expended in accordance with regulations prescribed by 

19 the Committee on House Administration. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. De Witt R. Lee, Appellant.

Appeal dismissed for failure to comply with previous order.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32

                             EMS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

                                CERTIFICATION OF
                             CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                       AND
                             CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

         Each of the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of EMS Technologies, Inc. hereby individually certifies that the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended July 3, 2004,
to which this Certification is attached, fully complies with the requirements of
Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the
information contained in such Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of EMS Technologies, Inc.

    In witness whereof, each of the undersigned has executed and delivered this
    Certification on this 12th day of August, 2004.

/s/ Alfred G. Hansen                                     /s/ Don T. Scartz
------------------------------                       ---------------------------
Alfred G. Hansen                                     Don T. Scartz
Chief Executive Officer                              Chief Financial Officer
EMS Technologies, Inc.                               EMS Technologies, Inc.
Need to return call by / at/between and

. Signature: Project No.: 

### 0 317.00.005. 522 Page 1 of 1

Project Name: 

### DMR20 11 

## CBI?

Yes

No TELEPHONE CALL RECOR D

Incoming

Outgoing Date: 

### 03/07/13 Time: 

### 11:00 am

pm

Company Name: 

### Elkem Metals Company ERG Staff Name: 

### Kimberly Bartell

Contact Name: 

### Roger Wagner Contact Phone Number: 

### ( 304)779

- 3379

General Subject: 

### 2011 DMR Concentration Values and Units



## TOPICS DISCUSSED AND ACTION TAKEN

On March 7, 2013 I called Roger Wagner and he stated that this facility was no longer owned by Elkem Metals.

It is called WVA Manufacturing LLC and is owned by Globe Metallurgical Inc. He stated that he realized that

there were many mistakes in the 2011 DMR data and that he was trying to get them corrected with the state. He

said that there was a convers ion error from mg to ug and that any concentrations that were huge needed to be

divided by 1,000,000. I revised the data and the TWPE is now around 19,349

.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-7336

RONNIE PERRY,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at 

Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:20-hc-02028-FL)

Submitted: February 18, 2021 Decided: February 23, 2021

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ronnie Perry, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Ronnie Perry seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice

his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition as an unauthorized, successive § 2254 petition. The order is 

not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial 

showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When, as here,

the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both 

that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable and that the petition states a debatable 

claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Gonzalez v. Thaler, 565 U.S. 134, 140-41 

(2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)). 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Perry has not made 

the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the 

appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

DISMISSED
Director Compensation



 Exhibit 10.46 
 Schedule of Compensation for Non-Employee Directors 
  

					
	 Annual Retainer
	  	$	10,000	 
	 Committee Chairman Annual Retainer:
	  			
	 Audit Committee
	  	$	12,500	 
	 Compensation Committee
	  	$	6,000	 
	 Committee Member Annual Retainer
	  			
	 Audit Committee
	  	$	7,500	 
	 Compensation Committee
	  	$	4,000	 
	 Regular Board Meeting Fee
	  	$	2,500	(1)
	 Special Board Meeting Fee
	  	$	1,000	(2)
	 Committee Meeting Fee
	  	$	1,000	(3)
	 New Member Restricted Stock/Stock Option Award Grant (#)
	  	 	  	(4)
	 Committee Chairman Restricted Stock Award
	  			
	 Audit Committee (#)
	  	 	  	(4)
	 Compensation Committee (#)
	  	 	  	(4)
	 Nominating Committee (#)
	  	 	  	(4)
	 Committee Member Restricted Stock Award
	  			
	 Audit Committee (#)
	  	 	  	(4)
	 Compensation Committee (#)
	  	 	  	(4)
	 Annual Director Stock Option Grant
	  	 	  	(4)
	 Annual Director Restricted Stock Grant
	  	 	  	(4)



	(1)	The fee is $1,000 if participation is by telephone. 


	(2)	The fee is $500 if participation is by telephone. 


	(3)	The fee is $500 if participation is by telephone. 


	(4)	Any award is at the discretion of the Compensation Committee or Board of Directors. 

  







 Schedule of Compensation for 
 Chairman of the Board of Directors 
  

					
	 Consulting Arrangement
	  	$	12,000/month	 
	 Annual Stock Option Grant
	  	 	(1	)
	 Annual Restricted Stock Grant
	  	 	(1	)



	(1)	Any award is at the discretion of the Compensation Committee or Board of Directors. 

  

 2
FY 24 ED EXECUTIVE FLEET

Acquisition Type VEHICLE MAKE VEHICLE MODEL VEHICLE 

YEAR COLOR FUEL TYPE LE STATUS POC/DIVISION ASSIGNMENT

GSA LEASED FORD TAURUS 2018 DARK BLACK GASOLINE N/A MOTORPOOL

GSA LEASED RAM PROMST25WC 2019 LIGHT WHITE GASOLINE N/A MOTORPOOL

GSA LEASED CHEVROLET BOLT EUV 2023 DARK BLACK DEDICATED ELECTRIC N/A MOTORPOOL

GSA LEASED CHEVROLET BOLT EUV 2023 DARK BLACK DEDICATED ELECTRIC N/A MOTORPOOL

GSA LEASED FORD MACH-E 2024 VAPOR BLUE DEDICATED ELECTRIC N/A MOTORPOOL

GSA LEASED FORD EXPLORER 2024 DARK BLACK ETHANOL/UNLEADED 

GASOLINE N/A PHYSICAL SECURITY & PREPAREDNESS DIVISION

GSA LEASED CHEVROLET 1500 SUBURBAN 2019 DARK BLACK ETHANOL/UNLEADED 

GASOLINE N/A PROTECTIVE SERVICES DIVISION

AGENCY OWNED DODGE DURANGO 2017 DARK BLACK ETHANOL/UNLEADED 

GASOLINE L3 PROTECTIVE SERVICES DIVISION

AGENCY OWNED DODGE DURANGO 2017 DARK BLACK ETHANOL/UNLEADED 

GASOLINE L3 PROTECTIVE SERVICES DIVISION

AGENCY OWNED DODGE DURANGO 2017 DARK BLACK ETHANOL/UNLEADED 

GASOLINE L3 PROTECTIVE SERVICES DIVISION

COMMERCIALLY 

LEASED FORD EXPEDITION XLT MAX 2021 DARK BLACK ETHANOL/UNLEADED GASOLINE L2 PROTECTIVE SERVICES DIVISION

COMMERCIALLY 

LEASED FORD EXPEDITION XLT 2021 DARK BLACK ETHANOL/UNLEADED GASOLINE N/A MOTORPOOL
1491Q-13-Pj

·14 CFR P'art 

### 39' DEPAR1'MFNr OF'f'RAc'iSPORTATIO" Fe-dc,tal ,~"iirnUon AdmiIfisti-ation



# ()Qs5' fDocJ:et N'o. FAi,,_20I'O-f**,**~; Dirt:dorat,ddeniifi'er 20tO-NM~OT3-Ajjl to:-t!_'.-:o. 

### ~Nli1- 

### Jib. Ti\ 

# i'5Jrt'1. r.~



# ,

FB,;'J;.....; 

# ~q 23't'lo - ,-.j 

# ";~1.(}" 

# ..,.,....,.~,- ,At:[

!During:,ni.lljnll:nm;lCC, Qtl ;l:'-32J:l'~ I (Xi ;:ner9P.lalj'~, f.lc,r<lok ~i.':I~:JbtfllU 09' i1 frih,' 'tab fitting asseml:Hy: -l1re:causc of ,~h~ c'fa;ikjng~"vas i(leilti'l~ cd 'l:$"sn'e:;s 'corrosion'. . _ 

# j. . This condition. if not·oortt:dlcd, could lca~·t:oin-flight futlmc o'flhe [ab fining. possibly r~uffing in loS$of Q)nao~ of the-aeroplane . Held-by A".:Cr'aft :\.erospaccBmnH; f.airthihl'l90rnicr GrrlbH; Dohfi-cr Lullf:lbn GntO 

### Model12S--100 and -JOO AiiDl:io'Cs 

# I lAG 

### i:';'N~~:Federal,·A!\i:tl11tltl _~dminisfrtl.ri(m (EjA). DDr ..

. .\ CTlfi)\~: N.otlcc, of proposed. 

# -rolemakl Q!;' 

### (t-..'PRMj.

~

# .. Iisred 2b6"'e:. This pmpose:{i .~D-testilts from rn'<rntlatory contimring airwQl1.him .. 'S5" ~ inform.ation (MeAl) origioctetftry m1 :i"\'12tron 

## authonlY of aoother c-ounlry lO-jdL"nlify 

# i~o-., arid corr-ect :'in unMfe condition Oil-an aviation 

## predl.lt1. The- 

# ~1Cj,\~ d~'iC'.ribcs the un3.di,1 

# ~..,¥J!i'b j'V candition ,~:' RlN 112.o-:\A64



# • • 

## • • 

# .....,.-.-.- n.e p-~sed AD wouldrequire- actions ·that.are-rrftcndCd ro ~(ldn.'5S rhe unsafe conditi... 'I dC5Cflb-::d in the MGAI. - 

# I DA'TF:S: We must rece1\'c comments on·lhl~

# PtQrs~ 1\:D by rj~SERT



### DATE ,5 FAA Form1360:14.1 (6-89) OFFlCw...FllE COP •. u.s:G"Q '~7"-ol:m01O'
**UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION**

# THE  SECRETARY

MEMORANDUM

TO:       Director, Executive Secretariat

FROM:          The Secretary

SUBJECT: Delegation of Authority for Responsibilities Under the Federal Information Security Management Act of 2002 with Regard to Correspondence and Memoranda Tracking Software Under the Purview of the Office of the Secretary/Executive Secretariat

I. DELEGATION

Under the authority vested in me by Section 412 of the Department of Education Organization Act, 20 U.S.C. 3472, I hereby delegate to you, or to your successor in function, responsibilities under the Federal Information Security Management Act of 2002, with regard to oversight and accreditation of the correspondence and memoranda tracking software under the purview of the Office of the Secretary/Executive Secretariat, including the authority to serve as the senior agency official for the Office of the Secretary to accredit the system.

Unless otherwise noted in future delegations of authority, amendments to the authority cited herein are included within the scope of this delegation.

II.RESERVATIONS:   None.

III.REDELEGATION

The authority to serve as the senior agency official to accredit the system may be redelegated to an Executive Secretariat staff member that is not the system manager.  No other redelegation is authorized. 

IV.CERTIFICATION AND EFFECTIVE DATE

This delegation is effective upon certification by the Department’s Delegations Control Officer. 

               _________/s/______________ 

                Rod Paige

OGC Clearance and Date:  /s/ David Berthiaume, 1/12/2005

Certified Date:  1/19/2005

Departmental Delegations Control Officer:  /s/ Naty G. Beetle

Control Number:  EA/EAS/154