alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-40032

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

MARTIN TEJEDA-SILVA,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:12-CR-1466-1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Martin Tejeda-Silva raises an

argument that he concedes is foreclosed by United States v. Rodriguez, 711 F.3d

541, 559-62 & n.28 (5th Cir. 2013) (en banc), petition for cert. filed (June 6, 2013)

(No. 12-10695), in which this court concluded that the generic, contemporary

definition of “sexual abuse of a minor” does not require that the age of consent

be lower than 17 years old and does not include an age-differential requirement. 

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

August 20, 2013

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

 Case: 13-40032 Document: 00512347210 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/20/2013
No. 13-40032

The appellant’s motion for summary dispositionisGRANTED, and the judgment

of the district court is AFFIRMED.

2

 Case: 13-40032 Document: 00512347210 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/20/2013
EXHIBIT 32.2
         Certification of the Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 18
             U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
                        of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with this quarterly report of Espey Mfg. & Electronics  Corp. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the  date  hereof,  I,  David  O'Neil,
Treasurer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

         1.       The report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       The information  contained in this report fairly presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

Date: May 10, 2007


                                             /s/ David O'Neil
                                             ---------------------------
                                             David O'Neil, Treasurer and
                                             Principal Financial Officer




                                       17
H. Res. 1602 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

December 4, 2024. 

Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall 

be in order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 5349) to 

develop and disseminate a civic education curriculum and oral 

history resources regarding certain political ideologies, and 

for other purposes. All points of order against consideration 

of the bill are waived. The amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on Education and the 

Workforce now printed in the bill shall be considered as 

adopted. The bill, as amended, shall be considered as read. 

All points of order against provisions in the bill, as amended, 

are waived. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill, as amended, and on any further amendment 

thereto, to final passage without intervening motion except: 

(1) one hour of debate equally divided and controlled by the 

chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on 

Education and the Workforce or their respective designees; 

(2) the further amendment printed in part A of the report 

of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution, if 
2 

•HRES 1602 EH 

offered by the Member designated in the report, which shall 

be in order without intervention of any point of order, shall 

be considered as read, shall be separately debatable for the 

time specified in the report equally divided and controlled by 

the proponent and an opponent, and shall not be subject to 

a demand for division of the question; and (3) one motion to 

recommit. 

SEC. 2. Upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in 

order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 7198) to amend 

title 5, United States Code, to require greater transparency 

for Federal regulatory decisions that impact small businesses, 

and for other purposes. All points of order against consideration of the bill are waived. The amendment in the nature 

of a substitute recommended by the Committee on the Judiciary now printed in the bill shall be considered as adopted. 

The bill, as amended, shall be considered as read. All points 

of order against provisions in the bill, as amended, are 

waived. The previous question shall be considered as ordered 

on the bill, as amended, and on any further amendment 

thereto, to final passage without intervening motion except: 

(1) one hour of debate equally divided and controlled by the 

chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on the 

Judiciary or their respective designees; (2) the further 

amendment printed in part B of the report of the Committee 

on Rules accompanying this resolution, if offered by the 
3 

•HRES 1602 EH 

Member designated in the report, which shall be in order 

without intervention of any point of order, shall be considered 

as read, shall be separately debatable for the time specified 

in the report equally divided and controlled by the proponent 

and an opponent, and shall not be subject to a demand for 

division of the question; and (3) one motion to recommit. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
Order entered March 31, 2020

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-01162-CR

STACY DAVIDSON, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 380th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 380-80297-2019

ORDER

Before the Court is the State’s March 30, 2020 motion for extension of time 

to file its brief. We GRANT the motion and ORDER the State’s brief received

that same day filed as of the date of this order.

/s/ BILL PEDERSEN, III 

JUSTICE
11.107 Solicitation provision. ( a ) Insert the provision at 52.211-6, Brand Name or Equal, when brand name or equal purchase descriptions are included in a solicitation.
( b ) Insert the provision at 52.211-7, Alternatives to Government-Unique Standards, in solicitations that use Government-unique standards when the agency uses the transaction-based reporting method to report its use of voluntary consensus standards to the National Institute of Standards and Technology (see OMB Circular A-119, “Federal Participation in the Development and Use of Voluntary Consensus Standards and in Conformity Assessment Activities”). Use of the provision is optional for agencies that report their use of voluntary consensus standards to the National Institute of Standards and Technology using the categorical reporting method. Agencies that manage their specifications on a contract-by-contract basis use the transaction-based method of reporting. Agencies that manage their specifications centrally use the categorical method of reporting. Agency regulations regarding specification management describe which method is used.
[64 FR 51835, Sept. 24, 1999]
NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS REPORT

NBS PROJECT MBS REPORT

1002-30-4876 January 27, 195'B 5756

Fim tnsT of Royciii^AD

by

Ssi^mB V* Eyaa

Fire Pfotoetloia o^etioa

RuiXdlng Tochnology i)ivi3ioa

For

0« 3# Coast Guard

llut!iori£,atio!i llo. caBa3l4-24-58

IMPOKTANI NUIICE

NATIONAL BUREAU OE SEAf

intended fui use within the G

to additional evaluation and re' listing of this Report, either in the Office of the Director, Nati however, by the Government ai to reproduce additional copies

Approved for public release by the

Director of the National Institute of

Standards and Technology (NIST) on October 9, 2015.

ogress accounting documents

rally published it is subjected

.‘production, or open-literature

on is obtaiired in writirrg from

inch pei'inissioii is trot needed,

repared il that agency wishes

U. S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS
r^KEaes9Be«sss:BBB=sa: I III A A

J

, •.; '.'• . 'S’ U- ;*Mf''T'*,H

. . ...»7 <>• r" !

. , .. .

• >• I !

'. .'I (}>b6 ‘J

;• .1> I. Vj lit

. 'f^r ^m- ^ ^

w>% iw^ Iw?^' *-& .i#J^

^

-'^

#1. ,tii%

^

*&*lr'i#:i Mm $m^im ^ iS^ ^«s»"l 'msLi.t

aSii?''i5?4»'--*«'-->ti*’'f>fej»*

$-m^i 4^ M ife# t'

'5v h^mM^ a t #*

tu:M .t

4' t1$ '^:iii^.A i:|i -mk^>i;: *

>. )»# «^' ^.?i«':-'V' : .f '%«;; . bisd

'^> i ^^1

1

'vV.V’-f

'I

mt mi *A'5k ^'^is ,, ,^

tm $\X r4^tifiiif *^31.0; t\l «^, i2-^^ •*« tl ^;>fl

VSf ##•»»

% «JS I*il

^

i^. o:^ mi i^m>lm^m

Ht^* mW %> JiJJWAtH

til

^ M .tl^iiil^ : sj»UN?fii cs4f^4*i- i iN^-t ''\

:/'it«i fir *:^1 llr'^, »rif r?J?|V

^••Vi mvh^:4 tmys^ i*»5^ r LAiyf.''^-lsj ^!t' ^

oi sff? i^'

4i}. n*^ is»

*fri ^^a^»S3afaf ?i’i^' tsi^- li&s

X 1:t m%rJ^St

^

M. ^f^rnm m I

.^i\^ f mt^

f»*?U’ tis^ W? j&i^ |«i^)en<*^

^ ''•^ ‘ ’|i;:i&

%^3e^ Sfm>sn'4 tef ^^f^ifiwiw <sassNJ^ /it

tr«si^'44s^

^

^^lifiliy

iisf u% U'-?^m imm^ ^ ^ Wim «na| ' %M 'Smm % « ## -ms^ x-e^Mm

Jer3?fe:^ k^J dA.^

i«f Xm4^^ #S4 ## t*#

4W33^^ij»it y>^ mt0tt >h *JL 3# #ii^. s:<«»|!eK^ 4si"S^- l«is%lii«#f^

'f^'w

. mimm

%wkt mm^n 4-.#^ # d\ m^m Mmkmm

pn$m:m ml mi m

^

m0 '^mmm

.r • w; - -y.-..' ,' n a-#

- r«f V -

• y'
lllliilllllJilJiillillJlt
^

-m .>ivUA-'' X' ..t f . 4v 1^ifj^

XfMhM d

. ^mm: d^i^XSd': z: i

BSf«:P-> .-'fs^-rv ^

:

;

, , _ -^y£4^| ":?5 sfei; y4.'|^ ^

t^|;V %; tt ^

,V^. J.r.:' -'% -l'5%#--v yv^^^^^^,;y-«4’;^v«:4r

#i^f ,Ai - .y., yr.yy’,,'

^,>:.. y^»- '-^J^^.y! y-/vvsfe:<r , 4*..^

JtX '-^y ‘:-^M IC'^J '^V

^^:J<.^Xr ,yLr-^**V .i„„vy • C?^'"

?i-y-f^"-.^, t-*t^j'^«yyr^-5f

^ i--

r

: “i ^: ;. rj::. z iH ‘-‘tm --‘^cX ^:'m mX .H-

'

’

/i?i. t i;U.' V!;»? ;-- :-i,r- 'V’-'"€r "sy-f-':'

'vyi&C 'i,v'^-^ y^y."'vyi:“ ^ :/ m-,- ,^.
iII !I —i*- III

.<X

K a ¥ - m

mmmm

L O !

U

'"[

c<‘

I I I I I I I
1 .

;5 >•
T

TIME,

MIN.


i

IK, i

4> S|
### §3125c. Repealed. Pub. L. 104–127, title VIII, §859(a), Apr. 4, 1996, 110 Stat. 1173

Section, Pub. L. 101–624, title XIV, §1499A, as added Pub. L. 102–237, title II, §201(h)(1), Dec. 13, 1991, 105 Stat. 1847, related to education program regarding handling of agricultural chemicals and agricultural chemical containers.
### §7918. Period of effectiveness

This subchapter shall be effective beginning with the 2002 crop year of each covered commodity through the 2007 crop year.

(Pub. L. 107–171, title I, §1108, May 13, 2002, 116 Stat. 155.)
EXHIBIT 13.5



CONSENT OF EXPERT



We hereby consent to the use of our name contained in the technical report on the Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. Resource Estimate Update for the Avino Property Durango, Mexico with an effective date of October 27, 2016, and the reference as an expert contained in the Annual Report of Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 and incorporated by reference to the Company’s Registration Statements on Form S-8 (SEC File No.: 333-195120), Form F-3 (SEC File Nos.: 333-193471 and 333-195144) and Form F-10 (SEC File No.: 333-214396).





|                      | QG AUSTRALIA (PTY) LTD |                        
|--------------------- | ---------------------- | -----------------------
|                      |                        |                        
|Dated: March 10, 2017 | By:                    | */s/ Michael O’Brien*  
|                      |                        | Michael O’Brien, P. Geo
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
EASTERN DIVISION

DANIEL MEDINA and NIKITA GROSS,

Plaintiffs, Civil Action No.

Cook County Circuit Case No.

PUBLIC STORAGE, INC., a Maryland Real 2011-L-011664
Estate Investment Trust, WILLIS INSURANCE
SERVICES OF CALIFORNIAN, INC., a
California Corporation, and PS ILLINOIS

TRUST,
Defendants.
AFFIDAVIT OF DUNIA HAMDEN IN SUPPORT OF
DEFENDANT PUBLIC STORAGE’S NOTICE OF REMOVAL
1. I am over the age of 18 and am competent to make this declaration. I have

personal knowledge of the facts stated herein as a result of my employment with Public Storage
(“Public Storage”) and, if called to testify concerning them, could do so competently,

2. I am employed by Public Storage as Claims Manager in the Risk Management
Department. I have held this position for nearly eight years. In total, I have been with the
company for almost nine years. As Claims Manager, I am Public Storage’s liaison to the third
party claims administrator who handles the claims filed by Public Storage customers as part of
the Willis Storage Insurance Program.

3. Public Storage is a Maryland Real Estate Investment Trust organized under the
laws of the state of Maryland. Its principal place of business is in California and the
headquarters is located at 701 Western Avenue, Glendale, California, where most of the
company’s management, operational, and administrative personnel are located.

4, Based on the Complaint, it is my understanding that plaintiffs are seeking to sue
on behalf of all persons who, within the past four (4) years, have (i) rented a storage unit from
Public Storage in Illinois; (ii) purchased coverage for such storage unit as an insured under a

Willis Insurance Services of California Program; and (iii) submitted a claim for burglary loss that


was denied on the grounds that there was insufficient evidence to establish “forcible entry.” A
review of the information provided to Public Storage by the third party claims administrators of
the Willis Storage Insurance Program reveals that there are over 400 individuals who rented a
storage unit from Public Storage in Illinois, purchased insurance for such unit, and submitted a
claim for burglary loss that was denied on the grounds that there were no signs of forcible entry.
All of the individuals within this proposed class of individuals had a policy limit of at least
$2,000.

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California and the United

States of America that the foregoing is true and correct, and that this Declaration was executed

Dunia Hamden

on January 10, 2012, at Glendale, California.
#### Bristol-Myers Company, Respondent, v. Bargaintown U. S. A. No. 2 Corp., Appellant.

Order granting plaintiff’s motion to examine defendant pursuant to section 293 of the Civil Practice Act, dated November 23, 1959, unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondent. No opinion. Settle order. Concur — Breitel, J. F., Rabin, Valente and Bergan, JJ.
Exhibit 32.2




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Escalade, Incorporated (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 20, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Deborah Meinert, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/s/ Deborah MeinertChief Financial OfficerApril 16, 2010
No. 7929.

#### Sullivan, Guardian, et al. *v.*Burger et al.

(Decided September 29, 1903.)

Error to Circuit Court of Hamilton county.

*Messrs. Shay & Gogan,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Messrs. Goebel & Bettinger,*for defendants in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Burket, C. J., Spear, Davis, Shauck, Price and Crew, JJ., concur.
### SUBCHAPTER I—GENERAL DEFINITIONS
EXHIBIT 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with
the Annual Report of CreditRiskMonitor.com, Inc. (CRMZ) on Form 10-KSB for
the year ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Lawrence Fensterstock, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
the best of my knowledge: (1)
The Report fully
  complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
  Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
The information
  contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
  financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  By: /s/
Lawrence
  FensterstockLawrence
  FensterstockChief Financial
  OfficerMarch 30, 2007
EXHIBIT 32.1

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Esterline Technologies Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
April 29, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Form 10-Q), I, Robert W.
Cremin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

(1)       
          The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or
          78o(d)); and

(2)       
          The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                     |  |     |                                                                
|-------------------- |  | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated:  June 3, 2005 |  | By: | /s/  Robert W. Cremin                                          
|                     |  |     | Robert W. CreminChairman,
President and Chief Executive Officer
|                     |  |     |                                                                



---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                          0000032284
<NAME>                                         Orion Diversified Technologies

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              APR-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 MAY-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   Jul-31-1998
<CASH>                                              0
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    0
<PP&E>                                              0
<DEPRECIATION>                                      0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         129,512
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                       18,469
<OTHER-SE>                                   (147,981)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        0
<SALES>                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    0
<CGS>                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  100
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (100)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 0
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (100)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .00



</TABLE>
**Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber) of 12 September 2007 – Nikolaou v Commission**

**(Case T-259/03)**

Non-contractual liability – Inquiry of the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) concerning a Member of the Court of Auditors – Divulging of information – Protection of personal information – Access to the inquiry file and to OLAF’s report – Sufficiently serious breach of the rules of law conferring rights on individuals – Causal link – Loss

1.                     *Non-contractual liability – Conditions – Illegality – Damage – Causal link (Art. 288, second para., EC) (see paras 37-38,
141-142)*

2.                     *Non-contractual liability – Conditions – Sufficiently serious breach of a rule conferring rights on individuals – Hearing
(Art. 288, second para., EC) (see paras 39-44)*

3.                     *Non-contractual liability – Compensation for damage caused by servants of the Community in the performance of their duties
(Art. 288, second para., EC; European Parliament and Council Regulations No 1073/1999, Art. 8(3), and No 45/2001, Arts 2(a)
and (b), 3, 4(1) and (5)) (see paras 193-199)*

4.                     *Non-contractual liability – Conditions – Sufficiently serious breach of a rule conferring rights on individuals (Art. 288,
second para., EC; European Parliament and Council Regulations No 1073/1999, Art. 8(3), and No 45/2001, Arts 2, 3, 4(1) and
5(a) and (e)) (see paras 200-216, 230-233)*

5.                     *European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) – Regulation No 1073/1999 concerning investigations conducted by OLAF (European Parliament
and Council Regulation No 1073/1999) (see paras 236-246, 250-251)*

6.                     *Non-contractual liability – Conditions – Damage – Causal link (Art. 288, second para., EC) (see paras 304, 320, 330, 333)*

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | ACTION for damages, pursuant to the second paragraph of Article 288 EC, for the loss suffered by the applicant following publication of information concerning an inquiry carried out concerning her by the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) and OLAF’s refusal to grant her access to the inquiry file and to supply her with a copy of its final report. |

**Operative part**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | Orders the Commission to pay the applicant compensation of EUR 3 000; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Dismisses the remainder of the action; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 3. | | Orders the applicant to bear three quarters of her own costs and three quarters of the costs incurred by the Commission, which is to bear a quarter of its own costs and pay a quarter of the costs incurred by the applicant. |