alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §6206. Petition and review

#### (a) Petition

#### (1) In general

A person subject to an order may file with the Secretary a petition—

(A) stating that such order, a provision of such order, or an obligation imposed in connection with such order is not in accordance with law; and

(B) requesting a modification of the order or an exemption from the order.

#### (2) Hearings

A person submitting a petition under paragraph (1) shall be given an opportunity for a hearing on the petition, in accordance with regulations issued by the Secretary.

#### (3) Ruling

After the hearing, the Secretary shall make a ruling on the petition which shall be final if in accordance with law.

#### (b) Review

#### (1) Commencement of action

The district courts of the United States in any district in which such person who is a petitioner under subsection (a) resides or carries on business are hereby vested with jurisdiction to review the ruling on such person's petition, if a complaint for that purpose is filed within 20 days after the date of the entry of a ruling by the Secretary under subsection (a).

#### (2) Process

Service of process in such proceedings shall be conducted in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

#### (3) Remands

If the court determines that the ruling is not in accordance with law, the court shall remand the matter to the Secretary with directions either—

(A) to make such ruling as the court shall determine to be in accordance with law; or

(B) to take such further action as, in the opinion of the court, the law requires.

#### (4) Enforcement

The pendency of proceedings instituted pursuant to subsection (a) shall not impede, hinder, or delay the Attorney General or the Secretary from obtaining relief pursuant to section 6207 of this title.

(Pub. L. 101–624, title XIX, §1957, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 3876.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, referred to in subsec. (b)(2), are set out in the Appendix to Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 179 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
H. Res. 179

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                     February 28, 2023.
    Resolved, That the following named Members be, and are hereby, elected to 
the following standing committees of the House of Representatives:
    Committee on Agriculture: Mr. Bost (to rank immediately after Mr. Bacon).
    Committee on Science, Space, and Technology: Mr. Fleischmann (to rank 
immediately after Mr. Obernolte), Mr. Zinke (to rank immediately after Ms. 
Tenney).
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL

400 MARYLAND AVENUE, S.W., WASHINGTON, DC 20202-1510

Promoting the efficiency, effectiveness, and integrity of the Department’s programs and operations.

TO: Assistant Inspector General for Audit

 Assistant Inspector General for Investigations

FROM: Inspector General (Acting)

SUBJECT: Redelegation of Authority for Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Administrative 

Appeals On An As Needed Basis

I. DELEGATION 

Under the authority vested in me by delegation EA/EF/193 from the Secretary, certified 

on May 10, 2011, I hereby delegate to you, to anyone acting for you, or anyone 

delegated to perform the duties of your position, the authority to issue decisions on 

administrative appeals of denials of requests for records maintained in the Office of 

Inspector General under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), on an as needed basis,

to the extent that such decisions are consistent with the FOIA, Departmental regulations 

and Executive Orders. Specifically, this authority will apply to those administrative 

appeals for which there is an actual conflict of interest or an appearance of a conflict of 

interest that prevents the Inspector General and Deputy Inspector General (DIG) from 

issuing a decision on an administrative appeal. 

II. RESERVATIONS

Unless otherwise noted in existing or future delegations of authority, the following are 

not delegated:

A. Authority to waive or reduce all or part of any fee is reserved to the Headquarters 

Designated Denial Officer; and

B. Authority to submit reports to Congress or the President unless otherwise provided 

by law is reserved to the Secretary. 

III. REDELEGATION

No further delegation is authorized. 
Page 2 – Redelegation of Authority for Freedom of Information Act Administrative Appeals On An As Needed Basis

IV. CERTIFICATION AND EFFECTIVE DATE

This redelegation is effective upon certification by the Department’s Principal 

Delegations Control Officer. I hereby ratify actions within the scope of this delegation 

taken by the addressee prior to the date of certification. 

_____________/s_______________

_

Sandra Bruce

Date Certified: 6/3/2019

Departmental Delegations Control Officer:Jim Clemmens

Control Number: EF/EFA/202
DEVAL L. PATRICK 

Governor 

TIMOTHY P. MURRAY 

Lieutenant Governor 

April 4, 2008 

Mr. Robert Varney, Administrator 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency-Region I 

One Congress Street 

Boston, MA 

Dear Mr. Varney: 

IAN A. BOWLES 

Secretary 

LAURIE BURT 

Commissioner 

Enclosed please find the Massachusetts Certification of State Implementation Plan Adequacy Regarding 

Clean Air Act Sections 110(a)(1) and (2) for PM2. S. This certification reaffirms the ability and authority 

of the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (MassDEP) to implement, maintain and 

enforce the 1997 National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) for PM2 .5 . 

MassDEP prepared this certification pursuant to the October 2, 2007 U.S. Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) Guidance. According to the EPA Guidance, to the extent that existing SIPS for ozone and 

particulate matter already meet the requirements of Clean Air Act Sections 110(a)(1) and (2), states need 

only certify that fact to EPA. MassDEP submitted its certification with respect to the ozone NAAQS on 

December 14, 2007 . 

With respect to particulate matter, Massachusetts submitted its original SIP in 1971 and has revised the 

SIP numerous times since then to incorporate revised NAAQS and other EPA requirements. The existing 

Massachusetts SIP meets the Clean Air Act Section I 10(a)(1) and (2) requirements for the 1997 PM2.5 

NAAQS . 

If you have questions with respect to our certification of legal authority, please contact Margaret Stolfa, 

MassDEP's General Counsel, or with respect to the overall Massachusetts PM2.5 certification, contact 

Barbara Kwetz, BWP Planning & Evaluation Division Director . 

Enclosures. 

Cc: Carl Dierker, EPA-Region 1, OGC 

This information is available in alternate format. Call Donald M. Gomes, ADA Coordinator at 617-556-1057. TDD Service - 1-800-298-2207 . 

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS 

EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS 

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

ONE WINTER STREET, BOSTON, MA 02108 617-292-5500 

MassDEP on the World Wide Web: http ://www .mass.gov/dep 

£'a Printed on Recycled Paper
April 27, 2015

Mr. Scott Eveld

Aerial Information Technologies

27543 Ethan Allen Way

Menifee, CA 92585

Dear Mr. Eveld:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It 

explains why we cannot process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Cannot Process Your Request

We entered your January 23, 2015 exemption request on behalf of the Aerial Information 

Technologies into the public docket (No. FAA-2015-0153), but we are unable to process 

your request any further. The information you sent does not comply with the requirements of 

§ 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of 

the following:

• The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole.

• Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.
2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-4264.

Sincerely,

/s/

Dan Ngo

Program Analyst, Aircraft and 

 Airport Rules Division

Enclosure
#### 1232.7003 Payment system registration.
EXHIBIT 21.1

SUBSIDIARIES

ROHN
Industries, Inc.
6718 West Plank Road
Peoria, Illinois 61604

ROHN
Installation Services, Inc. (Delaware)
ROHN Enclosures, Inc. (Arizona)
ROHN, Inc. (Alabama)
ROHN Products, Inc. (Indiana)
ROHN Construction, Inc. (Texas)
ROHN de Mexico S.A. de C.V. (Mexico)
Folding Carrier Corp. (Delaware)
ROHN Foreign Sales Corp. (Barbados)
ROHN Foreign Holdings, Inc. (Delaware)
UNR Realty, Inc. (Illinois)
ROHN Servicios, S.A. de C.V. (Mexico)

---

QuickLinks
§ 553.4 Scope and applicability. ( a ) *Scope.* The development, maintenance, administration, and operation of the Army National Military Cemeteries are governed by this part, Army Regulation 290-5, and Department of the Army Pamphlet 290-5. The development, maintenance, administration, and operation of Army post cemeteries are not covered by this part.
( b ) *Applicability.* This part is applicable to all persons on, engaging in business with, or seeking access to or benefits from the Army National Military Cemeteries, unless otherwise specified.
### §5927. Repealed. Pub. L. 104–127, title VIII, §864, Apr. 4, 1996, 110 Stat. 1174

Section, Pub. L. 101–624, title XVI, §1674, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 3775; Pub. L. 102–237, title IV, §407(13), Dec. 13, 1991, 105 Stat. 1865, provided for establishment of Agriculture Research Facilities Planning and Closure Study Commission.
EAST\47812785.2 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

MARTIN, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) Case No. 1:12-cv-00215

)

DUN & BRADSTREET, INC. and ) Judge Der-Yeghiayan

CONVERGYS CUSTOMER MANAGEMENT )

GROUP INC., ) Magistrate Judge Denlow

)

Defendants. )

UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER 

OR OTHERWISE PLEAD IN RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT

Defendants, Convergys Customer Management Group Inc. (“Convergys”) and Dun & 

Bradstreet, Inc. (“Dun & Bradstreet”), by their counsel, hereby move this Court, under Fed. R. 

Civ. P. 6(b), for an extension of time to answer or otherwise plead in response to Plaintiff’s Class 

Action Complaint, and in support thereof states as follows:

1. Pursuant to service of summons, Defendant Convergys is required to answer or 

otherwise plead to the Complaint in this case by February 3, 2012. (ECF #8.)

2. Pursuant to service of summons, Defendant Dun & Bradstreet is required to 

answer or otherwise plead to the Complaint in this case by February 3, 2012. (ECF #7.)

3. The allegations of the Class Action Complaint relate to alleged violations of the 

Telephone Consumer Protection Act, 47 U.S.C. § 227.

4. Defendants are in the process of gathering records concerning the allegations 

contained in the Class Action Complaint so that they may fully address, and defend themselves

against, the claims asserted in the Class Action Complaint.

5. Defendants respectfully request that this Court extend their time to answer or 

otherwise plead to March 3, 2012.

Case: 1:12-cv-00215 Document #: 13 Filed: 01/27/12 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:38
EAST\47812785.2 2

6. Counsel for the Plaintiff does not oppose the proposed extension.

7. Defendants’ motion is not brought for purposes of needlessly delaying the 

proceedings and will not prejudice any party.

WHEREFORE, Defendants respectfully request that this Court grant their motion for an 

extension of time to answer or otherwise plead in response to the Class Action Complaint up to 

and including March 3, 2012.

Date: January 27, 2012 Respectfully submitted,

CONVERGYS CUSTOMER 

MANAGEMENT GROUP INC.

By: /s/ Albert E. Hartmann

One of Its Attorneys

Albert E. Hartmann (ARDC #06256064)

DLA PIPER US LLP

203 North LaSalle Street, Suite 1900

Chicago, Illinois 60601

T: 312-368-2142

F: 312-630-7317

Email: albert.hartmann@dlapiper.com

Respectfully submitted,

DUN & BRADSTREET, INC. 

By: /s/ Bart T. Murphy (by permission)

One of Its Attorneys

Bart T. Murphy

ICE MILLER LLP

2300 Cabot Drive, Suite 455

Lisle, Illinois 60532 

T: 630-955-6392

F: 630-955-4271

Email: bart.murphy@icemiller.com 

Case: 1:12-cv-00215 Document #: 13 Filed: 01/27/12 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:39
EAST\47812785.2 3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, Albert E. Hartmann, an attorney, depose and state that on January 27, 2012, I 

electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system, which 

will serve electronic notice to all counsel of record.

s/ Albert E. Hartmann

Albert E. Hartmann

Case: 1:12-cv-00215 Document #: 13 Filed: 01/27/12 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:40
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 23 - CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS




We  consent  to the incorporation by reference (1) in the Registration
Statements (Form S-8 No. 33-34906, Form S-8 No. 33-43102 and Form  S-8
No.  33-84094)  pertaining to the Provident Bancorp, Inc.  1988  Stock
Option Plan, (2) in Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to the Registration
Statement  (Form  S-8 No. 33-34904) pertaining to the  1990  Provident
Bancorp,  Inc.  Employee Stock Purchase Plan, (3) in the  Registration
Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-90792) pertaining to the Provident Bancorp,
Inc. Retirement Plan, (4) in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 No.
33-51230  and No. 33-62707) pertaining to the 1992 Outside  Directors'
Stock  Option Plan and the 1992 Advisory Directors' Stock Option  Plan
and  (5)  in  the  Registration  Statement  (Form  S-8  No.  33-61576)
pertaining  to the Provident Bancorp, Inc. Deferred Compensation  Plan
of our report dated January 13, 1997, with respect to the consolidated
financial statements of Provident Bancorp, Inc. included in the Annual
Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1996.





                                                     ERNST & YOUNG LLP






Cincinnati, Ohio
March 21, 1997
#### Mitchell B. Stock *v.*John W. Cobb et al.

*Jack Stock,*for the appellee (plaintiff).

*Allan M. Cane*and *Richard A. Shaffer,*for the appellants (defendants Whitehead et al.)

Argued February 4

decided February 4, 1975

The plaintiff’s motion to dismiss the appeal by the . defendants William and Constance Whitehead from the Superior Court in Fairfield County at Stamford is denied.
#### 1252.217-80 Department of Labor Safety and Health Regulations for Ship Repair.

As prescribed at 1217.7001(b), insert the following clause:

# Department of Labor Safety and Health Regulations for Ship Repair (NOV 2022)

Nothing contained in this contract shall relieve the Contractor of any obligations it may have to comply with—

(a) The Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 (29 U.S.C. 651, *et seq.*);

(b) The Occupational Safety and Health Standards for Shipyard Employment (29 CFR part 1915); or

(c) Any other applicable Federal, State, and local laws, codes, ordinances, and regulations.

(End of clause)
DISMISS; and Opinion Filed November 16, 2018.

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 18

- 01145

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF J .A.K. AND J.W.K., CH ILDREN

On Appeal from the 302nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF

- 17

- 11304



### MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Bridges, Brown, and Whitehill

Opinion by Justice Brown

Before the Court is appellant s ’ motion to dismiss the appeal. Pursuan t to Texas Rule of

Appellate Procedure 42.1(a)(1), we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P.

42.1(a)(1).

181145F.P05 /Ada Brown/
ADA BROWN JUSTICE– 2

– 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

IN THE INTEREST OF J.A.K. AND J.W.K., CHILDREN

No. 05

- 18

- 01145

- CV On Appeal from the 302nd Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. DF

- 17

- 11304. Opinion delivered by Justice Brown, Justices Bridges and Whitehill
part icipating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal.

We ORDER appellees Jennifer Kirtland, JEK Lending, LLC, and JEK Sep/Property, L.P. recover their costs, if any, of this appeal from appellants John Kirtland, Kirtland Realty Group, L.P., 1907 Elm GP Corp., 1900 Pacific GP Corp., PetroCorrigan GP, LLC, PetroCorrigan Development GP Corp., KRG GenPar, LLC, T.W. Duke Capital, LP, and TWDC GenPar, LLC.

Judgment entered this 16th day of November, 2018.
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE
F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Bryan Buchanan v. Matthew Mc E neny and Ken Black

Appellate case number: 01

- 1 8

- 0 0 5 30

- CV

Trial court case number: 201 6

- 873 1 1

Trial court: 55 th District Court of Harris County

Appellant, Bryan B u chanan

, ha s filed a notice of appeal of the trial court’s final judgment signed on May 15, 2018

. A reporter’s record was due to be filed by July 1 6

, 201 8. On November 8, 2018

, the court reporter responsible for preparing the reporter’s

record requested an extension of time to file the reporters’ record, stating that “[t]he deposit is in the mail to [her]

. ” W e granted the request and extended the time to December 10, 2018. When no reporter’s record was filed, we ordered the court reporter, or substitute court reporter, to file the reporter’s record no later than January 11, 2019. No reporter’s record has been filed, and the court repor ter has not otherwise responded to this
Court’s order.

Accordingly, appellant shall pay, or make arrangements to pay, for preparation of the reporter’s record, and shall provide written proof to the Clerk of this Court that he has paid, or made arrangement s to pay, for the reporter’s record no later than 30 days from the date of this order. Further, Gina Jackson, the official court reporter, or substitute court
reporter

, no later than 30 days from the date of this order, shall file a reporter’s record in

th is appeal or notify the Clerk of this Court of the status of the arrangements for preparation of the reporter’s record.

Absent a timely response, the Court may require appellant to file his brief and will
consider and decide the appeal on those issues or p oints that do not require a reporter’s

record for a decision. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 37.3(c).

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s Russell Lloyd

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: ___ February 21, 2019

___
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Foreign-Trade Zones Board

          - [S-03-2021]

An application has been submitted to the Foreign-Trade Zones (FTZ) Board by Dane County, Wisconsin, grantee of FTZ 266, requesting subzone status for the facility of Coating Place, Inc. (Coating Place), located in Verona, Wisconsin. The application was submitted pursuant to the provisions of the Foreign-Trade Zones Act, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), and the regulations of the FTZ Board (15 CFR part 400). It was formally docketed on January 6, 2021.

A notification of proposed production activity has been submitted and is being processed under 15 CFR 400.37 (Doc. B-62-2020). The proposed subzone would be subject to the existing activation limit of FTZ 266.

In accordance with the FTZ Board's regulations, Elizabeth Whiteman and Juanita Chen of the FTZ Staff are designated examiners to review the application and make recommendations to the Executive Secretary.

                    Public comment is invited from interested parties. Submissions shall be addressed to the FTZ Board's Executive Secretary and sent to:                     *ftz@trade.gov.*                     The closing period for their receipt is February 22, 2021. Rebuttal comments in response to material submitted during the foregoing period may be submitted during the subsequent 15-day period to March 8, 2021.                

                    A copy of the application will be available for public inspection in the “Reading Room” section of the FTZ Board's website, which is accessible via                     *www.trade.gov/​ftz.*

                    For further information, contact Elizabeth Whiteman at                     *Elizabeth.Whiteman@trade.gov*                     or Juanita Chen at                     *Juanita.Chen@trade.gov.*

Dated: January 7, 2021.

Andrew McGilvray,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2021-00436 Filed 1-11-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
EXHIBIT 21

ANDREW CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
List of Significant Subsidiaries

Significant subsidiaries of the registrant, all of which are wholly owned unless otherwise indicated, are as follows:

|Name of Subsidiary                             |  | Jurisdiction of Incorporation
|---------------------------------------------- |  | -----------------------------
|Andrew A.B.                                    |  | Sweden                       
|Andrew AG                                      |  | Switzerland                  
|Andrew AO                                      |  | Russia                       
|Andrew Canada, Inc                             |  | Canada                       
|Andrew Communications Oy                       |  | Finland                      
|Andrew Corporation (Mexico), S.A. de C.V       |  | Mexico                       
|Andrew Espana, S.A                             |  | Spain                        
|Andrew Financial Services Corporation          |  | State of Delaware            
|Andrew GmbH                                    |  | Germany                      
|Andrew Industria e Comercio, Ltda. (owned 70%) |  | Brazil                       
|Andrew International Corporation               |  | State of Illinois            
|Andrew Kommunikationssysteme AG                |  | Switzerland                  
|Andrew Satcom Africa (Pty.) Ltd.               |  | South Africa                 
|Andrew SciComm Inc.                            |  | State of Texas               
|Andrew S.A.R.L.                                |  | France                       
|Andrew S.R.L.                                  |  | Italy                        
|Andrew Systems Inc.                            |  | State of Delaware            
|Andrew Telecom, Inc.                           |  | State of Delaware            
|Andrew Telecommunications India Pvt. Ltd.      |  | India                        
|Andrew Telecommunications (Suzhou) Co. Ltd.    |  | China