alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 11


<PAGE>

                          FIRST COMMERCIAL CORPORATION
                        COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                  (Dollars in thousands, except per share data)



                                              For the Years Ended December 31, 
                                             ----------------------------------
                                                1996        1995        1994
                                             ----------  ----------  ----------

Net income                                   $   68,562  $   56,910  $   50,308
Less: Preferred stock dividend                        -           -         129
                                             ----------  ----------  ----------
Income applicable to common shares           $   68,562  $   56,910  $   50,179
                                             ==========  ==========  ==========

Weighted average number of common shares
   outstanding during the period             28,890,130  27,530,791  26,886,990

Earnings per common share                         $2.37       $2.07       $1.87
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A2 1 A1 03 9 . MARK C. BLOOMFI ELD v

. SUSAN BLOOMFI ELD.

Pl ai n t i ff Su s an Bl o o m fi el d an d d efen d an t M ark Bl o o m fi el d (“ Hu sb an d ”) were

d i v o rced i n 2 0 0 6

. In Decem b er 20 2 0

, th e t ri al co u rt i s su ed : (i ) an o rd er fi n d i n g

Hu s ban d i n co nt em

p t o f vari o u s p ro v i s io n s in th e p art i es ’ d i v orce d ecree; an d (i i ) an

o rd er reg ard i n g t h e s al e of cert ai n real p ro pert y co n t em p l at ed b y t h e d i v o rce d ecree.

Hu s ban d t h en fi led t h i s pro se d i rect ap p eal

, s eek i n g r e v i e w o f t h e D ecem b er 2 0 2 0

o rd ers . W e l ack ju ri s di ct i o n

.

“ Ap p eal s fro m j u d gm en t s o r o r d e r s i n d i v o rce, al i m o n y

, an d o t h er d o m es t i c

rel at i o n s cas es ” m

u s t be i n i t iat ed b y fi l i n g an ap pl i cat i o n fo r d is cret i o n ary rev i ew.

OCGA § 5 -6 -3 5 (a) (2 ), (b ). “ Co m p l i an ce wi t h t h e d is cret i o n ary ap p eal s p ro ced u re

i s ju ri s d ict i o n al

. ” S

mo a k v. Dep t

. o

f Hu ma n Res o u r ces

, 2 21 Ga. A p p

. 2 5 7, 2 5 7 (4 7 1

SE2 d 6 0 ) (1 9 9 6 ). Becau se th is i s a d o m es t i c rel at i o n s cas e, Hu s b an d was req u i red to

co m p l y w i t h t h e d i scret i o n ary ap p eal p ro ced u re to ob t ai n rev i ew o f t h e Decem b er March 03, 20212 0 2 0 ord ers

. 1 Hi s fai l u re t o d o s o d ep ri v es u s o f ju ri sd i ct i o n o v er t h i s di rect ap p eal

,

wh i ch i s h ereb y

DISM ISSED.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O f f i c e

, A t la n t a

,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r t if y t h a t th e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

.

1 Gi v en o u r ru l i ng in t h i s reg ard

, we ex p res s n o o p i n i o n o n w h et h er t h e

De c e m b e r 2 0 20 o rd ers were n on -fi n al

, i n wh i ch cas e co m pl ian ce wi t h t h e

i n t erl o cu t o ry ap p eal p ro ced ures al s o wo u l d b e req u i red t o s eek ap p el l at e rev i ew. See

OCGA § 5 -6 -3 4 (a), (b ); S cr u g g s v. Ga

. Dep t

. o

f H uma n Res o u r ces

, 2 61 Ga. 5 8 7,

5 8 8 -5 8 9 (1 ) (4 0 8 SE2 d 1 0 3 ) (1 9 9 1 ). 03/03/2021
**Exhibit
      32.1**




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Polydex Pharmaceuticals
      Limited (the “Company”) for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2007 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
      George G. Usher, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to 18
      U.S.C. 1350 as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002, that:




(1)
            the
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
            the
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                Company.




By /s/
      George G. Usher


George
      G.
      Usher,


Chief
      Executive Officer


April
      30,
      2007




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### (A) Gloria Lindell et al., Appellants, v. William Wertlieb, Respondent. (B) Theodore R. Malone, Appellant, v. Frederick H. Luneburg et al., Respondents.

[In each action] Motion by respondent [s] to dismiss appeal denied, on condition that appellant[s] perfect the appeal and be ready to argue or submit it at the April Term, beginning March 27,1961. The appeal is ordered on the calendar for said term. The record and appellant’s brief must be served and filed on or before March 1, 1961. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Ughetta, Kleinfeld and Pette, JJ., concur.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6,1

Eastern Division

Innovatio IP Ventures, LLC, Patent Litigation,

et al.

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:11−cv−09308

Honorable James F.

Holderman

JW Marriott Chicago, et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Tuesday, July 8, 2014:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable James F. Holderman: Status hearing held

and continued to 8/14/14 at 9:00 a.m. Notice mailed by judge's staff (ntf, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:11-cv-09308 Document #: 1155 Filed: 07/08/14 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:47958
HHT/Harman Exempt Pellet Heat Data

Model Heater Type Fuel Type EPA Weighted Test Method

Name/ Exempt Wood Pellets Ave. Emissions used by Lab Burn Rate Emissions Burn Rate Emissions Burn Rate Emissions Burn Rate Emissions Burn Rate Emissions

Number Pellet Other g/hour 5H-5G1-5G2-5G3 kg/hour g/hour kg/hour g/hour kg/hour g/hour kg/hour g/hour kg/hour g/hour

1 Exempt-Pellet Pellet/Pellet Corn (1) NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

2 Exempt-Pellet

Wood Pellets, 

Corn, Cherry Pits 1.42 5G3 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

3 Exempt-Pellet Pellet 2.40 5G3 NA NA 1.804 1.257 1.893 1.121 2.231 1.381 NA NA

XXV Exempt-Pellet Wood Pellets 0.90 5H 0.590 0.760 NA NA NA NA 1.960 0.990 NA NA

ACCENTRA Exempt-Pellet Wood Pellets 0.40 5H 0.640 0.290 NA NA NA NA 1.650 0.520 NA NA

PF100 Exempt-Pellet Wood Pellets 1.10 5H 0.640 0.660 NA NA NA NA 5.200 1.570 NA NA

P-68 Exempt-Pellet Wood Pellets 1.80 5H 0.750 1.300 NA NA NA NA 3.540 2.300 NA NA

P-61 Exempt-Pellet Wood Pellets 1.67 5G 0.480 0.610 0.830 0.580 1.440 1.440 3.040 4.400 NA NA

(1) Tested for exemption, not EPA, Intertek confirmed. + 75% efficiency hhv. +99% combustion efficiency.

Category 1 Category 2 Category 3 Category 4 Extra Run
Editorial Note on Part 842
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 842 appear at 81 FR 83688, Nov. 22, 2016.

§ 842.70 Reconsideration of final denial. ( a ) The statute does not provide for appeals. The original settlement authority may, however, reconsider any decision. There is no set format for a reconsideration but it should be submitted in writing within 60 days of the original decision.
( b ) The settlement authority may either grant all or any portion of the requested relief without referral to any other office, or forward the entire file with the reasons for the action and recommendations to the next higher claims settlement authority for independent review and final action.
[55 FR 2809, Jan. 29, 1990. Redesignated at 81 FR 83695, Nov. 22, 2016]
<PAGE>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 21

                                  Subsidiaries

                                 Name

-      Serologicals (Barbados), Inc. (FSC)

-      Serologicals Finance Company

-      Serologicals License Company

-      Serologicals, Inc.
       --)  Allegheny Biologicals, Inc.
       --)  Am Rho Laboratories, Inc.
       --)  Bioscot Limited
       --)  Serologicals Investment Company
            *  Serologicals Management Partnership, LP  (1)
       --)  Serologicals Royalty Company
       --)  Bio-Lab, Inc.
       --)  Med-Lab, Inc.

-      Seramed, Inc.
      --) Simi Biological Resources, Inc.
      --) Nations Biologics, Inc.

          *   Alameda Plasma Center, Inc.
          *   MBW Enterprises, Inc.
              +   American Biologics, Inc.
              +   National Biologicals, Inc.
      --) Bloomington Plasma, Inc.
      --) Seronat Plasma, Inc.
      --) Southeastern Biologics, Inc.
      --) Plasma Management, Inc.
      --) Reno Plasma, Inc.



   *  Unless otherwise indicated, all subsidiaries are wholly owned

   (1) Serologicals Investment Company is the 99% limited partner in
Serologicals Management Partnership. Serologicals, Inc. is the 1% general
partner.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    -    First tier subsidiary of Serologicals Corporation

      --)   Second tier subsidiary

          *     Third tier subsidiary

              +     Fourth tier subsidiary

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 4 (Thursday, January 7, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1122-1123]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-29311]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, & First-
Class Package Service Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: January 7, 2021.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

[[Page 1123]]


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
December 28, 2020, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, & First-Class 
Package Service Contract 73 to Competitive Product List. Documents are 
available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2021-59, CP2021-61.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2020-29311 Filed 1-6-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
1.404 Class deviations. Class deviations affect more than one contract action. When an agency knows that it will require a class deviation on a permanent basis, it should propose a FAR revision, if appropriate. Civilian agencies, other than NASA, must furnish a copy of each approved class deviation to the FAR Secretariat. ( a ) For civilian agencies except NASA, class deviations may be authorized by agency heads or their designees, unless 1.405(e) is applicable. Delegation of this authority shall not be made below the head of a contracting activity. Authorization of class deviations by agency officials is subject to the following limitations: ( 1 ) An agency official who may authorize a class deviation, before doing so, shall consult with the chairperson of the Civilian Agency Acquisition Council (CAA Council), unless that agency official determines that urgency precludes such consultation.
( 2 ) Recommended revisions to the FAR shall be transmitted to the FAR Secretariat by agency heads or their designees for authorizing class deviations.
( b ) For DOD, class deviations shall be controlled, processed, and approved in accordance with the Defense FAR Supplement.
( c ) For NASA, class deviations shall be controlled and approved by the Assistant Administrator for Procurement. Deviations shall be processed in accordance with agency regulations.
[48 FR 42103, Sept. 19, 1983, as amended at 56 FR 15148, Apr. 15, 1991; 59 FR 11387, Mar. 10, 1994; 61 FR 67411, Dec. 20, 1996; 67 FR 13053, 13068, Mar. 20, 2002]
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1582 

Honoring the lives of those who passed away in the tragic gangway collapse 

on Sapelo Island, Georgia. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 19, 2024 

Mr. CARTER of Georgia (for himself, Mr. MCCORMICK, Ms. WILLIAMS of 

Georgia, Mr. FERGUSON, Mr. JOHNSON of Georgia, Mr. AUSTIN SCOTT

of Georgia, Mr. BISHOP of Georgia, and Mrs. MCBATH) submitted the 

following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight 

and Accountability 

RESOLUTION 

Honoring the lives of those who passed away in the tragic 

gangway collapse on Sapelo Island, Georgia. 

Whereas, on October 19, 2024, 7 individuals passed away in 

a tragic gangway collapse on Sapelo Island, identified 

as— 

(1) Isaiah Thomas; 

(2) Carlotta McIntosh; 

(3) Jacqueline Crews Carter; 

(4) Cynthia Alynn Gibbs; 

(5) Queen Welch; 

(6) William Lee Johnson, Jr.; and 

(7) Charles League Houston; 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HRES 1582 IH 

Whereas numerous other victims were critically injured and 

hospitalized; 

Whereas the Sapelo Island community has been greatly 

harmed by this tragedy; and 

Whereas the Gullah Geechee community had gathered to celebrate Sapelo Island’s annual Cultural Day: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) honors the memory of the victims of this 

3 tragedy, identified as— 

4 (A) Isaiah Thomas; 

5 (B) Carlotta McIntosh; 

6 (C) Jacqueline Crews Carter; 

7 (D) Cynthia Alynn Gibbs; 

8 (E) Queen Welch; 

9 (F) William Lee Johnson, Jr.; and 

10 (G) Charles League Houston; 

11 (2) extends its condolences to the families and 

12 friends of the victims; 

13 (3) extends its condolences to the entire Gullah 

14 Geechee community; 

15 (4) expresses hope that those wounded make a 

16 full recovery; and 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HRES 1582 IH 

1 (5) expresses appreciation and thanks for law 

2 enforcement, and all first responders that helped 

3 render aid to victims. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
#### 1342.703-2 Certificate of indirect costs.

The designee authorized to waive the requirement for contractor certification of proposed final indirect cost rates is set forth in CAM 1301.70.
**IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS**

No. 05-0603

IN RE  LASANDRA MADDEN, INDIVIDUALLY, AND ON BEHALF OF LABREA WILLIAMS, A MINOR CHILD

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus

**ORDERED:**

1.Relators’ motion for temporary relief incident to petition for writ of mandamus, filed August 2, 2005, is granted.   The order dated June 23, 2005, in Cause No. 03-09218-D, styled *Lasandra Madden and Levell Madden, Individually, and on behalf of Labrea Williams, a minor child v. Columbia Hospital at Medical City Dallas Subsidiary, L.P. d/b/a Medical City Dallas Hospital; et al.*, in the 95th District Court of Dallas County, Texas, is stayed pending further order of this Court.

2.The real parties in interest are requested to respond to relators’ petition for writ of mandamus on or before 3:00 p.m., August 12, 2005.

Done at the City of Austin, this August 2, 2005.

Andrew Weber, Clerk

Supreme Court of Texas

By Claudia Jenks, Chief Deputy Clerk
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

July 7, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-60668

Summary Calendar

USMAN MALIK MANSOOR

Petitioner

v. 

ALBERTO R GONZALES, US ATTORNEY GENERAL

Respondent

--------------------

Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

BIA No. A95 319 915

--------------------

Before KING, WIENER and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Usman Malik Mansoor petitions for review of a May 11, 2005,

order of the Board of Immigration Appeals denying his motion to

reopen. On July 8, 2005, Mansoor filed in the United States

District Court for the Northern District of Texas a 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2241 petition seeking to enjoin his removal. The district

court transferred the action to this court under the authority of

the Real ID Act. See Real ID Act of 2005, Pub. L. 109-13, 119

Stat. 231, 302-11 (May 11, 2005). The Real ID Act instructs

district courts to transfer to the appropriate courts of appeals
No. 05-60668

-2-

all § 2241 petitions challenging final orders of removal,

deportation, or exclusion “pending in a district court on the

date of the enactment of the Act,” May 11, 2005. 119 Stat. 231,

311. Because Mansoor’s § 2241 petition was not pending in the

district court on May 11, 2005, the district court’s transfer of

the case to this court under the REAL ID Act was improper. 

We lack jurisdiction over the petition for review because it

was not filed within 30 days of the BIA’s order denying Mansoor’s

motion to reopen. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(1). Consequently,

Mansoor’s petition for review is DISMISSED FOR WANT OF

JURISDICTION.
#### (A) In the Matter of Stanley Charucki et al., v. Department of Investigation of New York City. In the Matter of Vic Construction Corp. et al. v. Department of Investigation of New York City. (B) Stereo Holding Corporation v. Ruth Eichel, as Executrix of Jacob Eichel, Deceased, et al. (C) Jack Davis v. Ruth Eichel, as Executrix of Jacob Eichel, Deceased. (D) Charles Lindner v. Ruth Eichel, as Executrix of Jacob Eichel, Deceased.

[In each appeal] Motion for a stay denied. Concur — Botein, P. J., Valente, Stevens, Eager and Bergan, JJ.
No. 785.

#### Shelley B. Hutchinson *v.*William M. Sperry et al.

April 19, 1920.

*Mr. William Mayo Atkinson*for petitioner.

*Mr. W. Benton Crisp*and *Mr. Frederick Getter*for respondents.

Petition for a writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1214 

Honoring the resiliency of America’s teachers during Teacher Appreciation 

Week of May 6, 2024, through May 13, 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 8, 2024 

Mr. TRONE (for himself, Mr. OWENS, Mr. CLEAVER, Mrs. CHAVEZ-DEREMER, 

Ms. WILLIAMS of Georgia, and Mr. MORELLE) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Education and the 

Workforce 

RESOLUTION 

Honoring the resiliency of America’s teachers during Teacher 

Appreciation Week of May 6, 2024, through May 13, 2024. 

Whereas teachers continue to work to overcome the learning 

deficits resulting from the COVID school closures; 

Whereas teachers are embracing new paradigms and pedagogies for teaching that reach diverse learners; 

Whereas teachers are overcoming the issues surrounding 

chronic absenteeism by creating welcoming school environments that partner with parents, families, and communities to support the learning of all children; 

Whereas teachers in public, private, charter, and homeschools 

provide a multitude of choices for all children to become 

successful, thriving members of society; 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HRES 1214 IH 

Whereas teachers continue to embrace rigorous expectations 

of their students to ensure they are college, career, and 

vocation ready; 

Whereas teachers constantly seek opportunities for professional development, such as National Board Certification, 

and more than half of all teachers possess a master’s degree; 

Whereas 84 percent of teachers are staying in the profession, 

and in the same school; 

Whereas the average teacher has 14.5 years of experience, 

and 46.5 percent have more than 15 years of experience; 

Whereas teachers spend an average of 52 hours each week 

on all teaching and other school-related activities; and 

Whereas it would be appropriate to honor teacher resilience: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) recognizes the ability of teachers to over3 come the most challenging of adverse events; 

4 (2) admires the efforts teachers make every day 

5 to enter the Nation’s classrooms and meet the 

6 unique needs of all children; 

7 (3) respects the hard work of teachers in con8 stantly improving their practice in search of effective 

9 strategies for their classes; 

10 (4) applauds the devotion and commitment 

11 teachers demonstrate for their profession and their 

12 students; and 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HRES 1214 IH 

1 (5) encourages all to demonstrate gratitude for 

2 the efforts of the teachers in our communities and 

3 for the unflinching resilience they demonstrate to 

4 benefit our country. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB