alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32b    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of International Bancshares Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Imelda Navarro, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| |  | By:   | /s/IMELDA NAVARROImelda Navarro Treasurer
| |  | ----- | -----------------------------------------
| |  | Date: | March 12, 2004                           

The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, and not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities
Exchange Act, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether on and before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in
such filing.

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---

QuickLinks
1.705 Supersession and modification. ( a ) If a D&F is superseded by another D&F, that action shall not render invalid any action taken under the original D&F prior to the date of its supersession.
( b ) The contracting officer need not cancel the solicitation if the D&F, as modified, supports the contract action.
[50 FR 1726, Jan. 11, 1985, and 50 FR 52429, Dec. 23, 1985, as amended at 67 FR 13053, Mar. 20, 2002]
### §5652. Relief from unfair trade practices

#### (a) Use of programs

#### (1) In general

The Secretary may, for each article described in paragraph (2), make available some or all of the commercial export promotion programs of the Department of Agriculture and the Commodity Credit Corporation to help mitigate or offset the effects of the unfair trade practice serving as the basis for the proceeding described in paragraph (2).

#### (2) Commodities specified

Paragraph (1) shall apply in the case of articles for which the United States has instituted, under any international trade agreement, any dispute settlement proceeding based on an unfair trade practice if such proceeding has been prevented from progressing to a decision by the refusal of the party maintaining the unfair trade practice to permit the proceeding to progress.

#### (b) Consultations required

For any article described in subsection (a)(2), the Secretary shall—

(1) promptly consult with representatives of the industry producing such articles and other allied groups or individuals regarding specific actions or the development of an integrated marketing strategy utilizing some or all of the commercial export programs of the Department of Agriculture and the Commodity Credit Corporation to help mitigate or offset the effects of the unfair trade practice identified in subsection (a)(2); and

(2) ascertain and take into account the industry preference for the practical use of available commercial export promotion programs in implementing subsection (a)(1).

(Pub. L. 95–501, title III, §301, formerly §302, as added Pub. L. 101–624, title XV, §1531, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 3680; renumbered §301, Pub. L. 110–246, title III, §3103(b)(2), June 18, 2008, 122 Stat. 1832.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 301 of Pub. L. 95–501 was classified to section 5651 of this title prior to repeal by Pub. L. 110–246.

Another prior section 301 of Pub. L. 95–501 amended sections 1761, 1762, 1764, and 1765 of this title prior to the complete revision of Pub. L. 95–501 by Pub. L. 101–624.
Exhibit 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Composite Technology Corporation (the "Company")
Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended September 30,
2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Benton H Wilcoxon, Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material
respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



                                /s/ Benton H Wilcoxon
                                -------------------------
                                Benton H Wilcoxon
                                Chief Executive Officer
                                (Principal Executive Officer)
                                Acting Chief Financial Officer
                                (Principal Financial Officer)

                                August 14, 2006
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

THE SECRETARY

MEMORANDUM

TO: Assistant Secretary for Planning, Evaluation, and

 Policy Development

FROM: The Secretary

SUBJECT: Delegation of Authority

I. DELEGATION

By the authority vested in me by section 412 of the Department of Education 

Organization Act, 20 U.S.C. § 3472, I hereby delegate to you, your successor in 

function, and anyone serving for you in an acting capacity, the following 

administrative authorities as delegated to all Principal Officers for their respective 

areas of responsibility, to be exercised with respect to the area of responsibility of 

the Office of Planning, Evaluation, and Policy Development. Copies of these 

delegations are accessible on ConnectED at: 

http://connected1.ed.gov/po/om/executive/doa/main.html

Certification Date Authority Delegated

A. 9/4/1992 Authority under 34 CFR Part 8 regarding demands for 

testimony

B. 11/7/1995 Authority under 20 U.S.C. §3481 to accept gifts of travel 

from ED employees

C. 7/31/1996 Authority under 5 U.S.C. §3595(b) (3) (B) to file written 

objections to OPM regarding SES qualifications

D. 9/29/1997 Authority to suspend or remove/terminate employees for 

reasons of suitability under 5 CFR Parts 315 and 731

E. 7/22/1998 Authority to assert a deliberative process privilege as a 

basis for withholding documents or testimony

F. 12/3/1998 Authority to certify fund availability
G. 2/18/1999 Authority under the Federal Advisory Committee Act, P.L. 

92-463, to close advisory committee meetings or portions 

thereof to the public

H. 11/23/1999 Authority under 5 CFR Part 6301 and Executive Orders 

12674 and 12731 to make determinations with respect to 

requests for approval of outside activities

I. 4/7/2000 Authority to approve and sign certain Federal Register

documents

J. 7/30/2002 Authority under 5 U.S.C. §2903 to administer oaths of 

office to members of advisory and other committees

K. 5/25/2004 Authority to certify true copies of ED records in accordance 

with 20 U.S.C. §3485

L. 8/3/2005 Authority to approve travel within the Continental US and 

non-foreign travel areas

Unless otherwise noted in future delegations of authority, amendments to the 

authorities delegated herein are included within the scope of this delegation.

II. RESERVATIONS

Unless otherwise noted, the reservations contained in the actual delegation 

documents remain in effect.

III. REDELEGATIONS

The authority for redelegations and the restrictions on redelegations in the actual 

delegation documents remain in effect.

IV. CERTIFICATION AND EFFECTIVE DATE

This delegation is effective upon certification by the Department’s Principal 

Delegations Control Officer.

I hereby ratify actions within the scope of this delegation taken by you prior to the 

date of certification.

__________/s/__________ 

 Margaret Spellings
OGC Clearance and Date: /s/ David Berthiaume, 10/12/2005

Certified Date: 10/17/2005

Departmental Delegations Control Officer: /s/ Naty G. Beetle

Control Number: EA/ED/2
# Sheet1

X0A0T

X0A1T

X0A2T

X0A3T

X0A4T

X0A5T

X0A6T

X0A7T

X0A8T

X0A9T

X0A10T

X0A11T

X0A12T

X0A13T

X0A14T

X0A15T

X0A16T

X0A17T

X0A18T

X0A19T

X0A20T

X0A21T

X0A22T

X0A23T

X0A24T

X0A25T

X0A26T

X0A27T

X0A28T

X0A29T

X0A30T

X0A31T

X0A32T

X0A33T

X0A34T
http://invalid.urihttp://invalid.urihttp://invalid.urihttp://invalid.urihttp://invalid.urihttp://invalid.urihttp://invalid.urihttp://invalid.urihttp://invalid.urihttp://invalid.urihttp://invalid.urihttp://invalid.urihttp://invalid.urihttp://invalid.urihttp://invalid.urihttp://invalid.urihttp://invalid.urihttp://invalid.urihttp://invalid.urihttp://invalid.urihttp://invalid.urihttp://invalid.urihttp://invalid.urihttp://invalid.urihttp://invalid.urihttp://invalid.urihttp://invalid.urihttp://invalid.urihttp://invalid.urihttp://invalid.urihttp://invalid.urihttp://invalid.urihttp://invalid.urihttp://invalid.urihttp://invalid.urihttp://invalid.urihttp://invalid.urihttp://invalid.urihttp://invalid.urihttp://invalid.urihttp://invalid.urihttp://invalid.urihttp://invalid.urihttp://invalid.urihttp://invalid.urihttp://invalid.urihttp://invalid.urihttp://invalid.urihttp://invalid.urihttp://invalid.urihttp://invalid.urihttp://invalid.urihttp://invalid.urihttp://invalid.urihttp://invalid.urihttp://invalid.urihttp://invalid.urihttp://invalid.urihttp://invalid.urihttp://invalid.urihttp://invalid.urihttp://invalid.urihttp://invalid.urihttp://invalid.uri
Exhibit 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Composite  Technology  Corporation  Annual Report on Form
10-KSB for the year ended  September 30, 2004 as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, Benton H Wilcoxon,
Chief  Executive  Officer and Acting  Chief  Financial  Officer of the  Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

(2)   The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents in all material
      respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906,  another
document authenticating,  acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Composite  Technology  Corporation
and will be retained by Composite  Technology  Corporation  and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



                    /s/ Benton H Wilcoxon
                    ------------------------------------------------------------
                    Benton H Wilcoxon
                    Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
                    Acting Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
### §7719. Methyl bromide

#### (a) In general

The Secretary, upon request of State, local, or tribal authorities, shall determine whether methyl bromide treatments or applications required by State, local, or tribal authorities to prevent the introduction, establishment, or spread of plant pests (including diseases) or noxious weeds should be authorized as an official control or official requirement. The Secretary shall not authorize such treatments or applications unless the Secretary finds there is no other registered, effective, and economically feasible alternative available.

#### (b) Methyl bromide alternative

The Secretary, in consultation with State, local and tribal authorities, shall establish a program to identify alternatives to methyl bromide for treatment and control of plant pests and weeds. For uses where no registered, effective, economically feasible alternatives available can currently be identified, the Secretary shall initiate research programs to develop alternative methods of control and treatment.

#### (c) Registry

Not later than 180 days after May 13, 2002, the Secretary shall publish, and thereafter maintain, a registry of State, local, and tribal requirements authorized by the Secretary under this section.

#### (d) Administration

#### (1) Timeline for determination

Upon the promulgation of regulations to carry out this section, the Secretary shall make the determination required by subsection (a) not later than 90 days after receiving the request for such a determination.

#### (2) Construction

Nothing in this section shall be construed to alter or modify the authority of the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency or to provide any authority to the Secretary of Agriculture under the Clean Air Act [42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.] or regulations promulgated under the Clean Air Act.

(Pub. L. 106–224, title IV, §419, as added Pub. L. 107–171, title VII, §7504(c), May 13, 2002, 116 Stat. 466.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Clean Air Act, referred to in subsec. (d)(2), is act July 14, 1955, ch. 360, 69 Stat. 322, which is classified generally to chapter 85 (§7401 et seq.) of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 7401 of Title 42 and Tables.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.

SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Fred C. Schulte, Chief Executive Officer of Elgin National Industries,
Inc., certify that:



| | 1. | This quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Elgin National Industries, Inc. fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in this quarterly report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Elgin National Industries, Inc.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





/S/    FRED C.
SCHULTEFred C. Schulte Chief Executive Officer


Date: August 13, 2003
### **CHAPTER 17—MISCELLANEOUS MATTERS**

Sec.
411 to 450l. Repealed, Omitted, or Transferred.
December 15 , 2015 Docket Operations, M

- 30 U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Room W12

- 140, West Building Ground Floor Washington, D.C. 20590

- 0001

RE: Request to amend and allow for the University of North Dakota the ability to utilize additional sUAS platforms under the same direction as the proposed exemption under consideration , docket # FAA

- 2015

- 6119

- 0001, submitted August 31 , 2015.

Dear Sir or Madam , Since the original submission of a petition for exemption by the University of North Dakota in August 2015, a UAS platform selection change has been made for its proposed undergraduate flight training program. As such, the University is requestin g the addition of the Sensurion Magpie Trainer MP

- T be added to the petition for exemption (FAA

- 2015

- 6119

- 0001)

. If you have any questions, please feel free to cont act me via email: hastings@aero.und.edu or (701) 7 77

- 3380

. Sincerely,

Mark Hastings UND Aerospace UAS Chief Pilot
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-40466 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JOSE DE LA PAZ VILLALOBOS-ANDRADE, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. L-00-CR-1336-1

-------------------- February 21, 2002 Before JOLLY, JONES, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jose De La Paz Villalobos-Andrade (Villalobos) has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Villalobos, who pleaded guilty to violating 8 U.S.C. § 1326, has received a copy of counsel’s motion and brief but has filed no response. Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from furtherNo. 01-40466 -2- responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Morgan Stanley: 

 

We have made a review, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), of the unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial information of Morgan Stanley and subsidiaries (“Morgan Stanley”) as of May 31, 2006 and for the six-month periods ended May 31, 2006 and 2005, and have issued our report dated July 6, 2006 (which report included an explanatory paragraph regarding Morgan Stanley’s change in accounting policy for recognition of equity awards granted to retirement-eligible employees). As indicated in such report, because we did not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on that information. 

 

We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included in Morgan Stanley’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended May 31, 2006,  is incorporated in the Prospectus Supplement of MS Structured TILES Series 2006-1 for the offering of Treasury Index LinkEd Securities (TILESSM) Series 2006-1 due February 15, 2034 (which Prospectus Supplement forms part of Registration Statement No. 333-101155 of MS Structured Asset Corp. on Form S-3 in relation to the TILES Series 2006-1 securities).

 

We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.

 

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

 

New York, New York 

July 6, 2006
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.0


                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY


Following is a list of the Company's subsidiaries:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                          Organized          Percent of
                                          Under              Voting Securities
Name                                      the Laws of        Owned by Registrant
----                                      -----------        -------------------
<S>                                       <C>                <C>
Intelect Finance Limited                  Bermuda            100%
Intelect Systems Corp.                    Delaware           100%
Intelect Network Systems Limited          England            100%

<CAPTION>
                                          Organized          Percent of Voting
                                          Under              Securities Owned by
Name                                      the Laws of        Intelect Systems Corp.
----                                      -----------        ----------------------
<S>                                       <C>                <C>
Intelect Network Technologies Company     Nevada             100%
Intelect Visual Communications Corp.      Delaware           100%
DNA Enterprises, Inc.                     Texas              100%
Intelect Europe Limited                   England            100%
</TABLE>
No. 783.

#### S. J. Lindsey *v.*United States.

March 22, 1920.

*Mr. A. Johnston Ackiss*for petitioner.

*Mr. Assistant Attorney General Frierson*for the United States.

Petition for a writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Fiscal Year 2013 Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies - DELAWARE

FY 2013 Title I

LEA ID District Allocation*

1000080 Appoquinimink School District 1,063,151

1001240 Brandywine School District 2,417,331

1000180 Caesar Rodney School District 2,243,177

1000170 Cape Henlopen School District 1,557,163

1000190 Capital School District 4,387,755

1000200 Christina School District 7,998,156

1000230 Colonial School District 4,749,191

1000270 Delmar School District 401,291

1000680 Indian River School District 3,089,604

1000790 Lake Forest School District 1,111,748

1000810 Laurel School District 907,093

1001080 Milford School District 1,229,883

1001300 Red Clay Consolidated School District 5,916,020

1001530 Seaford School District 3,215,096

1001620 Smyrna School District 994,400

1001850 Woodbridge School District 1,313,731

1099999 PART D SUBPART 2 0

* Actual amounts received by LEAs will be smaller than shown here due to State-level adjustments to Federal Title I allocations. States adjust

 allocations, for example, to reflect LEA boundary changes or the creation of new LEAs, including charter school LEAs, that are not accounted

 for in the statutory calculations. States also are permitted to reserve, for administration, up to 1 percent of the allocations they would receive

 if $14 billion were appropriated and generally must reserve 4 percent in fiscal year 2013 for school improvement activities. These 

 adjustments will reduce the actual amounts available.
**Exhibit (32)(b)**

 

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of The Empire District Electric Company(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2008 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),Gregory A. Knapp, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 
| **By**                                                       | **  /s/  Gregory A. Knapp** |   |
|--------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------|--------|
| Name:  Gregory A. Knapp                                      |
| Title:  Vice President - Finance and Chief Financial Officer |

 

Date:    May 8,2008

 

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 or otherdocument authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature thatappears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statementrequired by Section 906, has been provided to The Empire District ElectricCompany and will be retained by The Empire District Electric Company andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
#### The People *of*the State of New York, Respondent, v. Paul Swearengen, Appellant.

Motion by appellant to vacate order dated March 7, 1955, dismissing appeal, and for reconsideration of his motion to dispense with printing, which was denied by order dated November 22, 1954. Motion denied. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Ughetta, Kleinfeld and Christ, JJ., concur.