alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>      5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated financial statements for the year ended March 28, 1998, and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-28-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-28-1998
<CASH>                                              44,745
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       21,378
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                        128,370
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   209,280
<PP&E>                                             869,684
<DEPRECIATION>                                     480,047
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     892,231
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              798,551
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  102
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                        (466,635)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       892,231
<SALES>                                          2,266,770
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,266,770
<CGS>                                            1,627,233
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,627,233
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   778,357
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 113,770
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (252,590)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        51,393
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (303,983)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (303,983)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       (31.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0
        


</TABLE>
#### § 775.10 Relations with state, local and regional agencies.

Close and harmonious planning relations with local and regional agencies and planning commissions of adjacent cities, counties, and states, for cooperation and resolution of mutual land use and environment-related problems should be established. Additional coordination may be obtained from state and area-wide planning and development “clearinghouses”. These are agencies which have been established pursuant to Executive Order 12372 of July 14, 1982 (3 CFR, 1982 Comp., p. 197). The clearinghouses serve a review and coordination function for Federal activities and the proponent may gain insights on other agencies' approaches to environmental assessments, surveys, and studies in relation to any current proposal. The clearinghouses would also be able to assist in identifying possible participants in scoping procedures for projects requiring an EIS.
11.401 General. ( a ) The time of delivery or performance is an essential contract element and shall be clearly stated in solicitations. Contracting officers shall ensure that delivery or performance schedules are realistic and meet the requirements of the acquisition. Schedules that are unnecessarily short or difficult to attain— ( 1 ) Tend to restrict competition,
( 2 ) Are inconsistent with small business policies, and
( 3 ) May result in higher contract prices.
( b ) Solicitations shall, except when clearly unnecessary, inform bidders or offerors of the basis on which their bids or proposals will be evaluated with respect to time of delivery or performance.
( c ) If timely delivery or performance is unusually important to the Government, liquidated damages clauses may be used (see subpart 11.5).
[48 FR 42159, Sept. 19, 1983. Redesignated and amended at 60 FR 48241, Sept. 18, 1995]
1001.404 Class deviations. ( a ) The SPE is authorized to approve class FAR and DTAR deviations.
# 2019 Allocations

FY 2019 Title I Allocation
### SUBCHAPTER IV—COUNTRY OF ORIGIN LABELING
EXHIBIT 15








TXU Gas Company:

We have made a review, in accordance with standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants, of the unaudited condensed
consolidated interim financial information of TXU Gas Company and subsidiaries
(TXU Gas) for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2004 and 2003, as
indicated in our report dated May 14, 2004; because we did not perform an audit,
we expressed no opinion on that information.

We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included in TXU Gas'
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004, is
incorporated by reference in Registration Statements Nos. 333-85769,
333-85769-01, 333-85769-02 and 333-85769-03 on Form S-3.

We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under
the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration
Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or
certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.

Deloitte & Touche LLP

Dallas, Texas
May 14, 2004
Joseph /s

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 3, 2014

No. 04-12-00823-CV

Joel M. HAILEY,

Appellant

v.

Joseph PADUH III, Temporary Administrator of the Estate of Joe Perry Corzine, Deceased, and 

Stephen P. Takas Jr., Trustee of the Joe Perry Corzine Trust, and Successor Independent 

Executor of the Estate of James L. Corzine, Deceased,

Appellees

From the Probate Court No 2, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012-PC-0856A

Honorable Tom Rickhoff, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The Appellee’s Second Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Motion for 

Rehearing and En Banc Reconsideration is GRANTED. 

_________________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 3rd day of July, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Fiscal Year 2018 Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies - DELAWARE

FY 2018 Title I

LEA ID District Allocation*

1000080 Appoquinimink School District 1,029,469

1001240 Brandywine School District 3,520,175

1000180 Caesar Rodney School District 2,848,245

1000170 Cape Henlopen School District 1,732,480

1000190 Capital School District 4,411,627

1000200 Christina School District 9,893,625

1000230 Colonial School District 5,169,261

1000270 Delmar School District 332,203

1000680 Indian River School District 4,046,983

1000790 Lake Forest School District 1,859,483

1000810 Laurel School District 1,193,797

1001080 Milford School District 2,151,935

1001300 Red Clay Consolidated School District 7,950,875

1001530 Seaford School District 2,368,309

1001620 Smyrna School District 1,282,946

1001850 Woodbridge School District 1,408,121

1099999 PART D SUBPART 2 0

* Actual amounts received by LEAs will be smaller than shown here due to State-level adjustments to Federal Title I allocations. States adjust

 allocations, for example, to reflect LEA boundary changes or the creation of new LEAs, including charter school LEAs, that are not accounted

 for in the statutory calculations. States also are permitted to reserve, for administration, up to 1 percent of the allocations they would receive

 if $14 billion were appropriated and generally must reserve 7 percent of their allocations for school improvement. These 

 adjustments will reduce the actual amounts available.
### **CHAPTER 99—SHEEP PROMOTION, RESEARCH, AND INFORMATION**

Sec.
7101.
Findings and declaration of policy.
7102.
Definitions.
7103.
Issuance and amendment of orders.
7104.
Required terms in orders.
7105.
Referenda.
7106.
Petition and review.
7107.
Enforcement.
7108.
Investigations and power to subpoena.
7109.
Administrative provisions.
7110.
Regulations.
7111.
Authorization of appropriations.
#### § 2700.31 Declassification authority.

The Director, OMSN, is authorized to declassify OMSN originated documents after consultation with the appropriate OMSN staff members.
§ 865.104 Secretarial responsibilities. The Secretary of the Air Force is responsible for the overall operation of the Discharge Review program within the Department of the Air Force. The following delegation of authority have been made: ( a ) To the Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Air Force (Manpower, Reserve Affairs and Installations) to act for the Secretary of the Air Force in all discharge review actions subject to review by the Secretary as specified in § 865.113 of this subpart.
( b ) To the Director, Air Force Personnel Council, for operation of all phases of the discharge review function and authority to take action in the name of the Secretary of the Air Force in all discharge review actions except those specified in § 865.113 of this subpart.
#### § 775.8 Scoping.

As soon as practicable after the decision to prepare an EIS is made, an early and open process called “scoping” shall be used to determine the scope of issues to be addressed and to identify the significant issues to be analyzed in depth related to the proposed action (40 CFR 1501.7). This process also serves to deemphasize insignificant issues, narrowing the scope of the EIS process accordingly (40 CFR 1500.4(g)). Scoping results in the identification by the proponent of the range of actions, alternatives, and impacts to be considered in the EIS (40 CFR 1508.25). For any action, this scope may depend on the relationship of the proposed action to other existing environmental documentation.
### §2424. Death or incapacity of breeder

Legal representatives of deceased breeders and of those under legal incapacity may make application for plant variety protection upon compliance with the requirements and on the same terms and conditions applicable to the breeder or the successor in interest of the breeder.

(Pub. L. 91–577, title II, §54, Dec. 24, 1970, 84 Stat. 1548; Pub. L. 103–349, §13(h), Oct. 6, 1994, 108 Stat. 3143.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1994—Pub. L. 103–349 substituted "the successor in interest of the breeder" for "his successor in interest".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1994 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 103–349 effective 180 days after Oct. 6, 1994, see section 15 of Pub. L. 103–349, set out as a note under section 2401 of this title.
Exhibit 10.15


 


DESCRIPTIONS OF BASIC BONUS PLAN, INCENTIVE BONUS PLAN


AND CONTRACTUAL BONUS PLAN


(Compensatory Plans Applicable to Named Executive Officers)


 


BASIC BONUS PLAN


Certain
of the Company’s officers and key managers are included in a basic bonus plan.
Maximum potential awards under the basic bonus plan are determined as a
percentage of the participants’ base salaries. The basic bonus plan establishes
(a) two goals for Company earnings per share after payment of bonuses (the “Company’s
EPS”), which are uniform for all basic bonus plan participants (the “EPS Goals”);
and (b) goals for departmental/individual performance, which vary with each basic
bonus plan participant (the “Performance Goals”). No bonus is payable to any basic
bonus plan participant unless the Company’s EPS are at least equal to the first
EPS Goal (regardless of whether such participant satisfies his/her Performance
Goals). The maximum potential award is to be paid to any basic bonus plan
participant if the Company’s EPS are at least equal to the second (higher)  EPS Goal and such participant satisfies all
of his/her Performance Goals.


 


INCENTIVE BONUS PLAN


In
order to encourage and reward exceptional performance of the Company, the Company
also has an incentive bonus plan for certain of the Company’s senior
management. If an eligible participant receives a bonus under the incentive bonus
plan, no bonus is payable to such participant under the basic bonus plan.
Maximum potential awards under the incentive bonus plan are based on a higher
percentage of the participants’ base salaries than would otherwise be awarded
under the basic bonus plan. The incentive bonus plan establishes a third goal
for Company earnings per share (the “Incentive EPS Goal”), which is higher than
the second EPS Goal under the basic bonus plan. No bonus is payable under the incentive
bonus plan unless the Company’s EPS were at least equal to the Incentive EPS
Goal (regardless of whether any participant satisfied his/her Performance
Goals). The maximum potential award is to be paid to any incentive bonus plan
participant if the Company’s EPS were at least equal to the Incentive EPS Goal
and such participant satisfied all of his/her Performance Goals.


 


CONTRACTUAL BONUS PLAN


The
employment agreement between the Company and Chief Executive Officer Robert N.
Wildrick entitles Mr. Wildrick to a bonus of up to 250% of his base salary upon
achievement by the Company of certain specified earnings per share goals
established for each year of his employment agreement.
#### 1022.7000 Contract clause.

Insert the clause at 1052.222-70, Minority and Women Inclusion, in all solicitations and contracts in support of Departmental Offices for services that exceed the simplified acquisition threshold.
### §5680. Repealed. Pub. L. 115–334, title III, §3201(b)(4), Dec. 20, 2018, 132 Stat. 4617

Section, Pub. L. 107–171, title III, §3205, May 13, 2002, 116 Stat. 301; Pub. L. 110–246, title III, §3203, June 18, 2008, 122 Stat. 1837; Pub. L. 113–79, title III, §3205(a), (b), Feb. 7, 2014, 128 Stat. 780, related to program to provide direct and technical assistance to remove, resolve, or mitigate sanitary and phytosanitary and technical barriers that prohibit or threaten the export of United States specialty crops.
#### 1232.7001 Definition.

*Payment request,* as used in this subpart, means a bill, voucher, invoice, or request for contract financing payment with associated supporting documentation.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 7
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-1-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                            19,493
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                       5,794
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                  27,356
<CASH>                                             352
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                  78
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                             476
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  41,459
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                 13,441
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                              1,874
<POLICY-OTHER>                                     637
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                  1,720
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                3
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            51
<OTHER-SE>                                       8,110
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    41,459
<PREMIUMS>                                       6,607
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                              1,288
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                   4
<OTHER-INCOME>                                     352
<BENEFITS>                                       4,671
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                      1,414
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                               810
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,327
<INCOME-TAX>                                       302
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                968
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       968
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    12.04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    11.76
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                  13,405
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                              3,956
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                (168)
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                 773
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                 2,644
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                 13,441
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                          (168)
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

THE SECRETARY

MEMORANDUM

TO: Marcella Goodridge

FROM: The Secretary

SUBJECT: 

I. DELEGATION

This is to designate you as the Department of Education’s Alternate Agency Ethics 

Official. Pursuant to 5 C.F.R. § 2638.202(b) and under the authority vested in me by 

section 412 of the Department of Education Organization Act, 20 U.S.C. § 3472, I hereby 

delegate to you the authority to coordinate and manage the Department’s ethics program 

in the absence of the Designated Agency Ethics Official.

II. RESERVATIONS

None.

III. REDELEGATION

This authority may not be redelegated.

IV. CERTIFICATION AND EFFECTIVE DATE

This delegation is effective upon certification of the Department's Principal Delegations 

Control Officer. 

_________/s/______________ 

 Arne Duncan

OGC Clearance and Date: /s/ Debbie Friendly, 11/29/2010

Certified Date: 12/1/2010

Departmental Delegations Control Officer: /s/ Naty G. Beetle

Control Number: EA/EGR6/122
SINCLAIR 

COMMUNITY COLLEGE 

U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations 

West Building Ground Floor, Room W 12-140 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

July 10, 2015 

Subject: Sinclair Community College Petition to Amend Section 333 Exemption No. 11552, Regulatory 

Docket No. FAA-2015-0374 

Dear Sir or Madam, 

Sinclair Community College respectfully petitions to add the following small unmanned aircraft systems 

(UAS) to the referenced exemption granted May 12, 2015. The UAS in this request have been assigned 

and the following FAA registration numbers: 

UAS Aircraft Serial Number Re istration Number 

Inda o AP3522 N358SC 

Vireo 1002 N338SC 

Vireo 1003 N346SC 

This request does not impact the conditions and reasons relative to public interest and safety that support 

the original exemption. The following proprietary operating documents have been uploaded and 

previously mailed to: 

ATTN: The Office of Rulemaking 

FAA Headquarters, Building l0A 

800 Independence Avenue, S W 

Washington, DC 20591 

• Attachment #1: Indago User Guide, Lockheed Martin Procerus Technologies, Release 1.1 

(includes both operator and maintenance guidance) 

• Attachment #2: Operations Manual, Vireo Unmanned Aircraft System, Rosemount 

Aerospace, Inc. Document 11009-0001, Revision 05 

• Attachment #3: Maintenance Manual, Vireo Unmanned Aircraft System, Rosemount 

Aerospace, Inc. Document 11009-0002, Revision 02 

Please direct questions concerning this petition to Jeff Miller at jeff.miller, ,&sinclair.eduor 

Jeffr

/Cmr'mUmty

er 

Assi Presi ent, Wo rce Development 

Sincl Colle 

444 d Street

Davt 402
### §5106. Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated to carry out this chapter $7,500,000 for each of the fiscal years 1988 through 2023.

(Pub. L. 100–233, title V, §506, Jan. 6, 1988, 101 Stat. 1664; Pub. L. 101–624, title XVIII, §1853, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 3837; Pub. L. 103–354, title II, §282(e), Oct. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 3235; Pub. L. 106–472, title III, §306(c), Nov. 9, 2000, 114 Stat. 2073; Pub. L. 109–17, §1, June 29, 2005, 119 Stat. 339; Pub. L. 111–233, §2, Aug. 16, 2010, 124 Stat. 2493; Pub. L. 113–79, title V, §5401, Feb. 7, 2014, 128 Stat. 840; Pub. L. 115–334, title V, §5402(c), Dec. 20, 2018, 132 Stat. 4675.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–334 substituted "2023" for "2018".

2014—Pub. L. 113–79 substituted "2018" for "2015".

2010—Pub. L. 111–233 substituted "2015" for "2010".

2005—Pub. L. 109–17 substituted "2010" for "2005".

2000—Pub. L. 106–472 substituted "2005" for "2000".

1994—Pub. L. 103–354 substituted "2000" for "1995".

1990—Pub. L. 101–624 substituted "1995" for "1991".
§ 750.49 Delegations of adjudicating authority. ( a ) *Settlement authority.* ( 1 ) The Secretary of the Navy may settle or deny claims in any amount. The Secretary may pay the first $100,000.00 and report the excess to the Comptroller General for payment under 31 U.S.C. 1304. *See* 10 U.S.C. 2733(d).
( 2 ) The Judge Advocate General has delegated authority to settle claims for $100,000.00 or less.
( 3 ) The Deputy Judge Advocate General, the Assistant Judge Advocate General (General Law), the Deputy Assistant Judge Advocate General (Claims and Tort Litigation), and Head, Tort Claims Branch (Claims and Tort Litigation), have delegated authority to settle claims for $25,000.00 or less, and have denial authority in any amount.
( 4 ) Individuals with settlement authority under paragraph (a)(3) of this section may delegate all or part of their settlement authority. Such delegation must be in writing.
( b ) *Appellate authority.* Adjudicating authorities have the same authority as delegated in paragraph (a) of this section to act upon appeals. No appellate authority below the Secretary of the Navy may deny an appeal of a claim it had previously denied.
[57 FR 4722, Feb. 7, 1992, as amended at 72 FR 53420, Sept. 19, 2007]
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS

Appeals of

- )

)

Dragados USA, Inc. )

)

) ASBCA Nos. 62217, 62252, 62253

62443, 62480, 62481

62532

)

Under Contract No. N40085

- 12

- C

- 7714 )

APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT : Gregory H. Koger, Esq.

Stephen B. Shapiro

, Esq.

Holland & Knight LLP

Washington, DC

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Craig D. Jensen, Esq.

Navy Chief Trial Attorney

Rachel J. Goldstein, Esq.

Trial Attorney

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The dispute s have been settled. The appeal s are dismissed with prejudice.

Dated: September 1 , 202 1

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA Nos. 62217, 62252, 62253, 62443,

62480, 62481, 62532

, Appeals of Dragados USA, Inc. , rendered in conformance with the

Board’s Charter.

Dated: September 2, 2021 JOHN J. THRASHER

Administrative Judge

Chairman

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals

PAULLA K. GATES

- LEWIS

Recorder, Armed Services

Board of Contract Appeals
### §3316. Rules and regulations

The Secretary is authorized to issue such rules and regulations as the Secretary deems necessary to carry out the provisions of this chapter.

(Pub. L. 95–113, title XIV, §1470, Sept. 29, 1977, 91 Stat. 1019.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

For definition of "this chapter", referred to in text, see note set out under section 3102 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Oct. 1, 1977, see section 1901 of Pub. L. 95–113, set out as an Effective Date of 1977 Amendment note under section 1307 of this title.
<PAGE>
                                       
                        INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


Gamma Biologicals, Inc.

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement 
No. 33-44950 on Form S-8, Registration Statement No. 333-01147 on Form S-8 
and Registration Statement No. 333-40367 on Form S-8 of Gamma Biologicals, 
Inc. of our report dated May 22, 1998, incorporated by reference in the 
Annual Report on Form 10-K of Gamma Biologicals, Inc. for the year ended 
March 31, 1998.






/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
-------------------------
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Houston, Texas
June 26, 1998