alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

Aaron Rivera,

 

 Appellant,

v.

The State of Texas,

 State.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-19-00136-CR

Appeal from the

409th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 20050D02112)

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the State’s third motion for extension of time within which to file the

brief until March 19, 2020. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE 

THE STATE’S BRIEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. Jaime E. Esparza, the State’s attorney, prepare the 

State’s brief and forward the same to this Court on or before March 19, 2020.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 19

th day of February, 2020.

PER CURIAM

Before Alley, C.J., Rodriguez and Palafox, JJ.
#### FRANTZ, Appellant, v. MAREE et al., Respondents.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.

November 18, 1903.)

Action by Charles B. Frantz against William Marbe and others, from a judgment for defendants, plaintiff appeals. Affirmed.

Kroyer & Austin, for appellant. J. Marks, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

Upon thoroughly credible evidence, the justice was well able to find that the agreement of sale upon whieli the plaintiff sues never existed, and that the admission of the existence of the contract sought to be spelled from the sending of a letter, was in fact no admission, in view of the acceptable testimony showing the circumstances under which the letter was sent. Judgment affirmed, with costs.
§ 2400.43 Heads of offices. The Head of each unit is responsible for the administration of this regulation within his area. These responsibilities include: ( a ) Insuring that national security information is properly classified and protected;
( b ) Exercising a continuing records review to reduce classified holdings through retirement, destruction, downgrading or declassification;
( c ) Insuring that reproduction of classified information is kept to the absolute minimum;
( d ) Issuing appropriate internal security instructions and maintaining the prescribed control and accountability records on classified information under their jurisdiction.
Fiscal Year 2005 Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies - PUERTO RICO

Maximum Required

Expenditures For 

Choice-Related Maximum Per-Child

Transportation Expenditure For

FY 2005 Title I And Supplemental Supplemental

LEA ID District Allocation* Educational Services** Educational Services***

4300030 PUERTO RICO 466,486,771 93,297,354 1,076.25

4399998 Undistributed 0 0 0.00

4399999 PART D SUBPART 2 0 0 0.00

* Actual amounts received by LEAs will be smaller than shown here due to State-level adjustments to Federal Title I allocations. States adjust

 allocations, for example, to reflect LEA boundary changes or the creation of new LEAs, including charter school LEAs, that are not accounted

 for in the statutory calculations. States also are permitted to reserve up to 1 percent of allocations for administration and generally must

 reserve 4 percent in fiscal year 2005 for school improvement activities. These adjustments will reduce the actual amounts available

 under all three columns of the table.

** An LEA must use up to an amount equal to 20 percent of its Title I, Part A allocation (the “20-percent reservation”) received from the State 

 to cover choice-related transportation costs for students who exercise a choice option and to pay for supplemental educational services for

 students whose parents request such services. The 20-percent reservation may include Title I, Part A funds or funding from other Federal,

 State, local, and private sources. The amount shown in this column is the Department’s estimate of the amount that affected LEAs - those

 with schools identified for improvement, corrective action, or restructuring - may have to spend to meet this requirement. Actual 

 expenditures will depend on such factors as the number of students exercising a choice option or receiving supplemental educational services and

 the costs of satisfying these requests. An LEA has discretion to determine the allocation of these funds between choice-related transportation

 and supplemental educational services, except that it must spend at least one-quarter of the 20-percent reservation - or an amount equal to

 5 percent of its Title I, Part A allocation - on each activity if there is demand for both from students and their parents.

*** An LEA that must arrange for supplemental educational services is required to pay, for each child receiving services, the lesser of the actual cost

 of the services or an amount equal to the LEA’s Title I, Part A allocation received from the State divided by the number of poor students in the

 LEA, as determined by estimates produced by the US Bureau of the Census. Thus the amount shown in this column reflects the statutory “cap”

 on per-child expenditures for supplemental educational services.
### §388. Station for southern Great Plains area; establishment

The Secretary of Agriculture is authorized and directed to cause such shade, ornamental, fruit, and shelter-belt trees, shrubs, and vines as are adapted to the conditions and needs of the southern Great Plains area, comprised of those parts of the States of Colorado, Nebraska, Kansas, Texas, Oklahoma, and New Mexico lying west of the ninety-eighth meridian and east of the five thousand-foot contour line, to be propagated at one of the existing field stations of the Department of Agriculture in such area, and seedlings and cuttings and seeds of such trees, shrubs, and vines to be distributed free of charge under such regulations as he may prescribe for experimental and demonstration purposes within such area.

(Apr. 16, 1928, ch. 377, §1, 45 Stat. 430.)

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

Functions of all officers, agencies, and employees of Department of Agriculture transferred, with certain exceptions, to Secretary of Agriculture by 1953 Reorg. Plan No. 2, §1, eff. June 4, 1953, 18 F.R. 3219, 67 Stat. 633, set out as a note under section 2201 of this title.
THREE-FIVE SYSTEMS, INC.
                 STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
                                   EXHIBIT 11

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                     THREE MONTHS ENDED              NINE MONTHS ENDED
                                                        SEPTEMBER 30,                   SEPTEMBER 30,
                                                 ---------------------------    ---------------------------

                                                     1996            1995           1996            1995
                                                 -----------     -----------    -----------     -----------
<S>                                              <C>             <C>            <C>             <C>
Common shares outstanding beginning of period      7,775,129       7,709,004      7,735,745       7,691,524

Effect of Weighting Shares:
  Employee stock options exercised                     4,363          12,273         27,942          17,976
  Employee stock options outstanding                    --           367,041           --           376,954
                                                 -----------     -----------    -----------     -----------

Primary                                            7,779,492       8,088,318      7,763,687       8,086,454
                                                 ===========     ===========    ===========     ===========



Common shares outstanding beginning of period      7,775,129       7,709,004      7,735,745       7,691,524

Effect of Weighting Shares:
  Employee stock options exercised                     4,363          12,273         27,942          17,976
  Employee stock options outstanding                    --           367,041           --           376,970
                                                 -----------     -----------    -----------     -----------

Fully diluted                                      7,779,492       8,088,318      7,763,687       8,086,470
                                                 ===========     ===========    ===========     ===========


Net income (loss)                                $(5,478,000)    $ 1,383,000    $(4,586,000)    $ 7,516,000
                                                 ===========     ===========    ===========     ===========



NET INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON AND
  COMMON EQUIVALENT SHARES:

Net income (loss) per share

  Primary                                        $     (0.70)    $      0.17    $     (0.59)    $      0.93
                                                 ===========     ===========    ===========     ===========
  Fully diluted                                  $     (0.70)    $      0.17    $     (0.59)    $      0.93
                                                 ===========     ===========    ===========     ===========
</TABLE>
#### § 935.91 Summons.

Upon the filing of a complaint, a Judge or Clerk of the Court shall issue a summons in the following form and deliver it for service to a peace officer or other person specifically designated by the Court to serve it:

# In the Wake Island Court

[Civil Action No. ___]

________ (*Plaintiff*), vs. ________ (*Defendant*)

### Summons

To the above-named defendant:

You are hereby directed to appear and answer the attached cause at ______ on ______ day of ___ 20—, at ______ -.M. and to have with you all books, papers, and witnesses needed by you to establish any defense you have to said claim.

You are further notified that in case you do not appear, judgment will be given against you, for the amount of said claim, together with cost of this suit and the service of this order.

Dated: ______, 20 ______. (Clerk, Wake Island Court) ________
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: GlenCanyon/Rainbow Bridge park guide**
 
2012 | 2013
 
SuDoc Number:I 29.21/2:G 48/
Item Number:0650-A-01 (online)
CGP systemNumber:001058838
 
May 30, 2018
EXHIBIT 15

ENSERCH Corporation:



We have made a review in accordance with standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants of the unaudited interim condensed
consolidated financial information of ENSERCH Corporation and subsidiary
companies for the periods ended September 30, 1996 and 1995, as indicated in
our report dated October 25, 1996; because we did not perform an audit, we
expressed no opinion on that information.


We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included in your
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 1996, is
incorporated by reference in Registration Statements No. 2-59259, No. 33-
40589, No. 33-47911 and No. 2-77572 on Form S-8, in Registration Statements
No. 33-15623, No. 33-52525 and No. 33-61635 on Form S-3, and in Registration
Statements No. 333-12391 and No. 333-13241 on Form S-4.

We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c)
under the Securities Act, is not considered a part of the Registration
Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or
certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that
Act.



DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Dallas, Texas
November 12, 1996
EXHIBIT 32 (a)

CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of Enzo Biochem, Inc., and Subsidiaries (the
Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2010 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Elazar Rabbani, Ph.D., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| |     |                                                                                                                                                       
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) | The Report
 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the
 Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                             
| |     |                                                                                                                                                       
| | (2) | The
 information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
 the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                         |     |                           
|------------------------ | --- | --------------------------
|Dated:
 October 14, 2010 |     |                           
|                         | By: | /s/ Elazar
 Rabbani, Ph.D.
|                         |     |                           
|                         |     | Elazar
 Rabbani, Ph.D.    
|                         |     | Chief
 Executive Officer  

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Act
Commission or its staff upon request.

---
TSD on Mercury Emissions from State Rules and Voluntary ACI

For purposes of the necessary finding, EPA does not include mercury reductions attributable to state 

mercury-specific regulations that result in the construction or operation of Activated Carbon Injection (ACI) 

mercury controls or voluntary mercury reduction programs, because such rules and programs are not required 

pursuant to the CAA. EPA does include mercury reductions from ACI at units that commenced operation after 

2007, because states are required under section 112(g) to require HAP limitations (including Hg) for new units. 

While EPA has not verified that those units installed ACI pursuant to section 112(g) limitations, we determined it 

was likely the controls were required pursuant to the CAA so we included them in our emissions estimates. 

Calculation of the mercury emission reductions excluded from the necessary finding required 

identification of the affected ACI controls and estimation of the incremental mercury removal in the base case 

modeling due to the operation of that ACI. This adjustment required calculation of revised mercury emissions 

based on each affected model plant’s technological configuration once the ACI was removed. Projected fuel use 

was assumed to remain unchanged. These adjustments are summarized at the state level in Table 1.

Table 1. Mercury Reductions Attributable to Mercury-Specific State Rules and Voluntary Mercury Controls in 

2015 Base Case Projections (tons)

State

State 

Rule

Voluntary 

ACI

AZ 0.058

CO 0.175

CT 0.003

DE 0.029

GA 0

IA 0.113

IL 1.628

IN 0.123

MA 0.083

MD 0.074

ME 0.01

MI 0.002

MN 0.39

MO 0.027

MT 0.244

NH 0.005

NM 0.027

NY 0.061

OR 0.064

TX 1.443

WI 0.143

Total 3.109 1.593
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

February 18, 2022

No. 04

- 21

- 00195

- CR

Guillermo MORALES III,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 451st Judicial District Court

, Kendall County, Texas

Trial Court No. 7388

Honorable Kirsten Cohoon , Judge Presiding



### ORDER

The State ’ s Motion for Exte nsion of Time to File Brief is GRANTED IN PART. The

state ’ s brief is due on March 16, 2022.

_________________________________ Liz a A. Rodriguez , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 18th day of February, 2022

.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court
### §6993. Transfer of functions

There are transferred to the Division all functions exercised and all administrative appeals pending before the effective date of this subchapter (including all related functions of any officer or employee) of or relating to—

(1) the National Appeals Division established by section 1433e(c) 1 of this title (as in effect on the day before October 13, 1994);

(2) the National Appeals Division established by subsections (d) through (g) of section 1983b 1 of this title (as in effect on the day before October 13, 1994);

(3) appeals of decisions made by the Federal Crop Insurance Corporation; and

(4) appeals of decisions made by the Soil Conservation Service (as in effect on the day before October 13, 1994).

(Pub. L. 103–354, title II, §273, Oct. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 3230.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The effective date of this subchapter, referred to in text, probably means the date of enactment of Pub. L. 103–354, which was approved Oct. 13, 1994.

Section 1433e of this title, referred to in par. (1), was repealed by Pub. L. 103–354, title II, §281(b), Oct. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 3233.

Section 1983b of this title, referred to in par. (2), was repealed by Pub. L. 103–354, title II, §281(c), Oct. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 3233.

1 See References in Text note below.
#### Gladys Espinoza, Respondent, v Concordia International Forwarding Corp., Defendant, and Professional Line Warehousing Inc., Doing Business as Pro Line Warehousing Inc., et al., Appellants.

[836 NYS2d 3]

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Alexander W Hunter, Jr., J), entered April 4, 2006, which denied defendants’ motion *259to change venue from Bronx County to Queens County, unanimously reversed, on the law, the facts and in the exercise of discretion and the motion granted, without costs.

The motion court improvidently exercised its discretion since Queens County is the site where plaintiffs personal injury claim arose, where plaintiff resides and was treated for her injuries, and where the corporate defendants conduct business *(see Ohrenstein v LaGuardia Racquet Club,*118 AD2d 515 [1986]; *John H. Dair Bldg. Constr. Co. v Mayer,*27 AD2d 535 [1966]). The sole connection to Bronx County is that it is the residence of the nominal, individual defendant, an employee of the corporate defendant who admittedly was acting within the scope of his duties at the time of the accident, such that if liability were adjudged against him, he would be indemnified by his employer. Concur—Andrias, J.E, Sullivan, Williams, Gonzalez and Malone, JJ.
### §415e. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 415e was editorially reclassified as section 2247a of this title.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

          - [Investment Company Act Release No. 34159]

# ADDRESSES:

                        The Commission:                         *Secretarys-Office@sec.gov*.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Shawn Davis, Assistant Director, at (202) 551-6413 or Chief Counsel's Office at (202) 551-6821; SEC, Division of Investment Management, Chief Counsel's Office, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-8010.

## Premier Multi-Series VIT [File No. 811-22712]

*Summary:*                         Applicant seeks an order declaring that it has ceased to be an investment company. On April 22, 2020, applicant made a liquidating distribution to its shareholders based on net asset value. Expenses of approximately $97,923 incurred in connection with the reorganization were paid by the applicant and the applicant's investment adviser.                    

*Filing Dates:*                         The application was filed on July 29, 2020, and amended on December 3, 2020.                    

*Applicant's Address:**Craig.Ruckman@allianzgi.com.*

## SEI Insurance Products Trust [File No. 811-22862]

*Summary:*                         Applicant seeks an order declaring that it has ceased to be an investment company. On September 28, 2020, applicant made a liquidating distribution to its shareholders based on net asset value. Expenses of approximately $21,512 incurred in connection with the liquidation were paid by the applicant.                    

*Filing Date:*                         The application was filed on October 1, 2020.                    

*Applicant's Address:**john.obrien@morganlewis.com.*

For the Commission, by the Division of Investment Management, pursuant to delegated authority.

J. Matthew DeLesDernier,

Assistant Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2020-29013 Filed 12-31-20; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P