alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Fiscal Year 2002 Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies - HAWAII

Maximum Required

Expenditures For 

Choice-Related Maximum Per-Child

Transportation Expenditure For

FY 2002 Title I And Supplemental Supplemental

LEA ID District Allocation * Educational Services** Educational Services ***

1500001 Hawaii County 6,838,389 1,367,678 1,083.91

1500003 Honolulu County 22,067,446 4,413,489 1,135.51

1500005 Kalawao County 0 0 0.00

1500007 Kauai County 1,872,920 374,584 1,023.45

1500009 Maui County 2,892,778 578,556 879.26

1599999 PART D SUBPART 2 0 0 0.00

* Actual amounts received by LEAs will be smaller than shown here due to State-level adjustments to Federal Title I allocations. States adjust

 allocations, for example, to reflect LEA boundary changes or the creation of new LEAs, including charter school LEAs, that are not accounted

 for in the Department's calculations. States also are permitted to reserve up to 1 percent of allocations for administration and must reserve

 2 percent of allocations (rising to 4 percent in fiscal year 2004) for school improvement activities. These adjustments will reduce the actual

 amounts available under all three columns of the table.

** An LEA must use up to an amount equal to 20 percent of its Title I, Part A allocation (the “20-percent reservation”) received from the State 

 to cover choice-related transportation costs for students who exercise a choice option and to pay for supplemental educational services for

 students whose parents request such services. The 20-percent reservation may include Title I, Part A funds or funding from other Federal,

 State, local, and private sources. The amount shown in this column is the Department’s estimate of the amount that affected LEAs - those

 with schools identifed for improvement, corrective action, or restructuring - may have to spend to meet this requirement. Actual 

 expenditures will depend on such factors as the number of students exercising either a choice option or supplemental educuational services and

 the costs of satisfying these requests. An LEA has discretion to determine the allocation of these funds between choice-related transportation

 and supplemental educational services, except that it must spend at least one-quarter of the 20-percent reservation - or an amount equal to

 5 percent of its Title I, Part A allocation - on each activity if there is demand for both from students and their parents.

*** An LEA that must arrange for supplemental educational services is required to pay, for each child receiving services, the lesser of the actual cost

 of the services or an amount equal to the LEA’s Title I, Part A allocation received from the State divided by the number of poor students in the

 LEA, as determined by estimates produced by the US Bureau of the Census. Thus the amount shown in this column reflects the statutory “cap”

 on per-child expenditures for supplemental educational services.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Floyd Edward Matson, Appellant.

Order unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: This appeal is from an order of Onondaga County Court which denied defendant’s motion for writ of error *coram nobis.*On May 12, 1960 in granting defendant’s motion to prosecute this appeal on original papers and in denying his application for *1080counsel, we said: "Application for counsel denied. (See *People*v. *Breslin,*4 N Y 2d 73.) It appears from the papers that the defendant has a copy of the transcript of the proceedings of February 7, 1951 upon arraignment on the second felony information.” (11 A D 2d 635.) For the reasons then stated we have rendered our decision herein notwithstanding the fact that appellant is not represented by counsel on this appeal. (Appeal from final order of Onondaga County Court denying defendant’s motion to vacate judgment of conviction rendered February 9, 1951, convicting defendant of the crimes of robbery, first degree [2 counts].) Present — Bastow, J. P., Goldman, Halpern, McClusky and Henry, JJ.
## VECOLIA ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES

June 7, 2013

United States Environmental Protection Agency George T. Czerniak Region 5 77 West Jackson Blvd. (A-18J) Chicago Il, 60604-3509

Dear Mr. Czerniak: Let me express my appreciation for the opportunity to meet with you and your staff last week to address Veolia Environmental Services' concerns regarding the re-opening of our Title V permit and the tiining of our Comprehensive Performance Test (CPT). Regarding the re-opening of our permit, it was encouraging to hear that it was never USEPA's intent, should Veolia appeal to the 7 tl ' Circuit Court, to force Veolia to implement the draft reopened permit conditions prior to the ruling on the appeal. This commitment is very important to Veolia and greatly appreciated. However, we do remain concerned with many of the specific items contained within the draft re-opened permit. Our first concern is the manner in which the re-opening was conducted. Furthermore, the permit was reopened 4 1

/2 years into its 5 year duration. As we mentioned in our meeting, with the permit renewal application in process, the re-opening of the permit occurring at the same time is redundant, unnecessary, and costly for both the USEPA and Veolia. We appreciate your commitment to provide Veolia with an approved CPT test plan by the end of June 2013 so Veolia can meet its 60 day public notice period prior to commencing its testing. However, as we discussed in the meeting, Veolia believes that the changing of the CPT schedule deviates from earlier agreements with USEPA. With USEPA's changing of the CPT schedule, both Veolia and USEPA could be subjected to potential lawsuits by environmental groups.

#7 Mobile Avenue, Sauget, 1L 62201 (618) 271 -2804 www.veoliaes.com

## Q)VEOLIA ENVIRONMENTA!_ SERV(CES

Veolia would suggest that you please review the documents and discussions that we had with your predecessor in 2008 and the precedent set by subsequent testing schedules that were approved by the USEPA after the 2009 CPTs were performed. We believe a return to the original testing schedules would eliminate the potential for lawsuits by environmental groups and constitutes fair treatment to Veolia. Again, thank you for the opportunity to meet with you and your staff and we look forward to continuing to work with you.

Very truly yours,

f Doug Harris General Manager Veolia ES Technical Solutions, L.L.C.

#7 Mobile Avenue, Sauget, IL 62201 (618) 271-2804 www.veoliaes.com
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                      10,039,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                8,926,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   171,000
<INVENTORY>                                  4,612,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            24,588,000
<PP&E>                                      22,154,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               9,265,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              55,921,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        9,189,000
<BONDS>                                      4,847,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       147,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  41,172,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                55,921,000
<SALES>                                     24,452,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            24,452,000
<CGS>                                       13,699,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               13,699,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             7,865,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             103,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,186,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   956,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,230,000
<DISCONTINUED>                             (1,980,000)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   250,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .03
        

</TABLE>
<Page>

EXHIBIT 21

                  SUBSIDIARIES OF SECURITY CAPITAL CORPORATION

<Table>
<Caption>
                                                                 JURISDICTION OF
                      NAME                                        INCORPORATION
                      ----                                       ---------------
  <S>                                                                <C>
  Security Capital Insurance Group, Inc.                             Delaware

  Possible Dreams, Ltd.                                              Delaware

  P.D. Holdings, Inc.                                                Delaware

  Pumpkin Masters Holdings, Inc.                                     Delaware

  Pumpkin, Ltd.                                                      Delaware

  Primrose Holdings, Inc.                                            Delaware

  Primrose School Franchising Company                                Georgia

  The Jewel I, Inc.                                                  Georgia

  WC Holdings, Inc.                                                  Delaware

  Health Power, Inc.                                                 Delaware

  CompManagement, Inc.                                                 Ohio

  CompManagement Disability Services Company                         Virginia

  CompManagement Health Systems, Inc.                                  Ohio

  CompManagement of Virginia, Inc.                                   Virginia

  M & N Risk Management, Inc.                                          Ohio

  M & N Enterprises, Inc.                                              Ohio
</Table>
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL

400 MARYLAND AVENUE, S.W., WASHINGTON, DC 20202-1510

Promoting the efficiency, effectiveness, and integrity of the Department’s programs and operations.

TO: Deputy Inspector General

FROM: Inspector General (Acting)

SUBJECT: Redelegation of Authority for Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552, Requests 

for Records of the Office of Inspector General

I. DELEGATION 

Under the authority vested in me by delegation EA/EF/193 from the Secretary, certified 

on May 10, 2011, and in accordance with the Inspector General Act of 1978, as 

amended, 5 U.S.C. App., I hereby delegate to you, to anyone acting for you, or anyone 

delegated to perform the duties of your position the exclusive authority to administer 

the Department’s responsibilities under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 

§ 552, as amended, for documents maintained in the Office of Inspector General (OIG). 

This includes:

A. The authority to deny the release of documents, or portions of documents, to the 

extent that such denial is consistent with the FOIA, Departmental regulations, and 

Executive Orders;

B. The authority to issue decisions on administrative appeals of denials of requests for 

records to the extent that such decisions are consistent with the FOIA, Departmental 

regulations, and Executive Orders; and

C. The authority to charge fees to requesters of documents maintained in the OIG, 

consistent with the FOIA, Departmental regulations, and Executive Orders.

Unless otherwise noted in future delegations of authority, amendments to the existing 

authorities delegated herein are included within the scope of this delegation. 

II. RESERVATIONS

Unless otherwise noted in existing or future delegations of authority, the following are 

not delegated:

A. Authority to waive or reduce all or part of any fee is reserved to the Headquarters 

Designated Denial Officer; and
Page 2 – Redelegation of Authority for Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552, Requests for Records of the 

Office of Inspector General

B. Authority to submit reports to Congress or the President unless otherwise provided 

by law is reserved to the Secretary. 

III. REDELEGATION

You may redelegate the authority delegated to you. 

IV. CERTIFICATION AND EFFECTIVE DATE

This redelegation is effective upon certification by the Department’s Principal 

Delegations Control Officer. I hereby ratify actions within the scope of this delegation 

taken by the addressee prior to the date of certification.

______________/S______________

Sandra Bruce

Date Certified: 6/3/2019

Departmental Delegations Control Officer:Jim Clemmens

Control Number: EF/EF/200
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Esterline Technologies Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 28, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-Q), I, Robert D. George,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)        The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)        The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                         |  |     |  |                                                                
|------------------------ |  | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: September 1, 2006 |  | By: |  | /s/ Robert D. George                                           
|                         |  |     |  | Robert D. George                                               
|                         |  |     |  | Vice President, Chief Financial Officer,Secretary and Treasurer
### §7312. Composition

#### (a) Membership and appointment

The Commission shall be composed of 11 members, appointed as follows:

(1) Three members shall be appointed by the President.

(2) Four members shall be appointed by the Chairman of the Committee on Agriculture of the House of Representatives in consultation with the ranking minority member of the Committee.

(3) Four members shall be appointed by the Chairman of the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry of the Senate in consultation with the ranking minority member of the Committee.

#### (b) Qualifications

At least 1 of the members appointed under each of paragraphs (1), (2), and (3) of subsection (a) shall be an individual who is primarily involved in production agriculture. All other members of the Commission shall be appointed from among individuals having knowledge and experience in agricultural production, marketing, finance, or trade.

#### (c) Term of members; vacancies

A member of the Commission shall be appointed for the life of the Commission. A vacancy on the Commission shall not affect its powers, but shall be filled in the same manner as the original appointment was made.

#### (d) Time for appointment; first meeting

The members of the Commission shall be appointed not later than October 1, 1997. The Commission shall convene its first meeting to carry out its duties under this subchapter 30 days after 6 members of the Commission have been appointed.

#### (e) Chairperson

The chairperson of the Commission shall be designated jointly by the Chairman of the Committee on Agriculture of the House of Representatives and the Chairman of the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry of the Senate from among the members of the Commission.

(Pub. L. 104–127, title I, §182, Apr. 4, 1996, 110 Stat. 938.)
### §2008n. Repealed. Pub. L. 115–334, title VI, §6601(a)(1)(C), Dec. 20, 2018, 132 Stat. 4775

Section, Pub. L. 87–128, title III, §379, as added Pub. L. 107–171, title VI, §6022, May 13, 2002, 116 Stat. 368, related to rural telework.
**Exhibit 32**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theaccompanying Quarterly Report of Equity Oil Company (the “Company”) on Form10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Paul M. Dougan,Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, hereby certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,to the best of my knowledge and belief that:

 

(1)                                  Thereport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   |   /s/  Paul M. Dougan |   |
|--------|---------------------------------|--------|
|   | Paul  M. Dougan, President |
|   | Chief  Executive Officer        |
|   | November 7,  2003          |
|        |                                 |        |  |

 

----

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002**

 

In connection with theaccompanying Quarterly Report of Equity Oil Company (the “Company”) on Form10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Russell V.Florence, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, hereby certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,to the best of my knowledgeand belief that:

 

(1)                                  Thereport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   |   /s/  Russell V. Florence |   |
|--------|--------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Russell V.  Florence                 |
|   | Treasurer                            |
|   | Chief  Financial Officer             |
|   | November 7,  2003               |
|        |                                      |        |  |

 

----
EXHIBIT 32.B

















CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002










In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2010, of El Paso Natural Gas Company (the “Company”) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John R. Sult, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, certify (i) that the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (ii) that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.










/s/ John R. SultJohn R. SultExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)El Paso Natural Gas CompanyNovember 5, 2010




























A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to El Paso Natural Gas Company and will be retained by El Paso Natural Gas Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
First Amendment to R&D Equipment Utilization Agreement



 Exhibit 10.26(a) 
 FIRST AMENDMENT TO R & D EQUIPMENT UTILIZATION AGREEMENT 
 This First Amendment to R & D Equipment
Utilization Agreement (this “Amendment”) is entered into as of December 30, 2005 by and between Hynix Semiconductor, Inc. (“Hynix”) and MagnaChip Semiconductor Ltd. (“NewCo”) (each a “Party”, and
collectively the “Parties”). 
 WHEREAS, the Parties are parties to that certain R & D Equipment Utilization Agreement dated as of
October 6, 2004 (the “Agreement”), and wish to amend the Agreement as set forth below. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties agree as follows:

  

	 	1.	Section 9.1 is hereby amended and restated in its entirety as follows: 

 “Hynix shall invoice NewCo on the last day of each calendar month for the fees for the use and/or services provided under Article 6 for such calendar month, which invoices shall specify the use and/or services
provided for the applicable month and the amount of fees for such use and/or services calculated in accordance with Article 6. By the twentieth-fifth (25th) day of the next calendar month following the invoice, NewCo shall pay the invoiced amount and value added tax thereto to Hynix’s designated account by means of a wire transfer in
immediately available funds. All payments hereunder shall be made in Korean Won.” 
  

	 	2.	Capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Agreement. 

  

	 	3.	Wherever necessary, all terms of the Agreement are hereby amended to be consistent with the terms of this Amendment. Except as set forth herein, the Agreement remains in full force
and effect according to its terms. 

  

	 	4.	This Amendment shall become effective from the 6th of October, 2004. 

  

	 	5.	This Amendment shall be governed by, and shall be construed in accordance with, the laws of Korea. 

  

 1 








 [Signature Page Follows] 
  

 2 








 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have caused their duly authorized representatives to execute this Amendment as of the
date first set forth above. 
  

			
	MagnaChip Semiconductor, Ltd.
		
	 By:
	 	  
	 Name:
	 	 Youm Huh

	 Title:
	 	 President & Chief Executive Officer

	
	 Hynix Semiconductor, Inc.

		
	 By:
	 	  
	 Name:
	 	
	 Title:
	 	

  

 3
----

|   | 1. | The      Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the period ended December      31, 2008, (the "Annual Report"), fully complies with the requirements of      Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as      amended; |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The      information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of      the Company. |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/ Paul O. Koether          |   |
|------------------------------|--------|
| Paul      O. Koether         |   |
| Chief      Executive Officer |   |
|                         |   |
|                         |   |
| /s/ Bryan P. Healey          |   |
| Bryan      P. Healey         |   |
| Chief      Financial Officer |   |

----