alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> UT
<CIK> 0000317187
<NAME> PP&L.INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                        4,310
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                        686
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                             694
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                         3,148
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   8,838
<COMMON>                                         1,476
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                           44
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                                210
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                   1,730
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              295
<PREFERRED>                                        171
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                             2,819
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                      80
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                        0
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                        109
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                    59
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                   3,575
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                    8,838
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                        3,643
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                               273
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                       2,842
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                       3,115
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                            528
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                  77
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                     605
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           196
<NET-INCOME>                                     (539)<F1>
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                         48
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                    (587)
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                             0
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                          188
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                             695
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>NET INCOME INCLUDES AN EXTRAORDINARY ITEM OF ($948) MILLION ($1,614 MILLION
NET OF $666 MILLION OF INCOME TAXES) REFLECTING THE EFFECTS OF A PENNSYLVANIA
PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION RESTRUCTURING ORDER AND DEREGULATION PP&L'S ELECTRIC
GENERATION OPERATIONS.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
### §926. Certain rural development investments by qualified telephone borrowers not treated as dividends or distributions

#### (a) In general

The Secretary shall not—

(1) treat any amount invested by any qualified telephone borrower for any purpose described in section 2204b(c)(2) of this title (including any investment in, or extension of credit, guarantee, or advance made to, an affiliated company of the borrower, that is used by such company for such a purpose) as a dividend or distribution of capital to the extent that, immediately after such investment, the aggregate of such investments does not exceed 1/3 of the net worth of the borrower; or

(2) require a qualified telephone borrower to obtain the approval of the Secretary in order to make an investment described in paragraph (1).

#### (b) "Qualified telephone borrower" defined

As used in subsection (a), the term "qualified telephone borrower" means a person—

(1) to whom a telephone loan has been made or guaranteed under this chapter; and

(2) whose net worth is at least 20 percent of the total assets of such person.

(May 20, 1936, ch. 432, title II, §205, as added Pub. L. 101–624, title XXIII, §2356, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 4039; amended Pub. L. 103–354, title II, §235(a)(13), Oct. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 3221; Pub. L. 115–334, title VI, §6602(b)(3), Dec. 20, 2018, 132 Stat. 4776.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 115–334, §6602(b)(3)(A), struck out "and the Governor of the telephone bank" after "The Secretary" in introductory provisions.

Subsec. (a)(2). Pub. L. 115–334, §6602(b)(3)(B), struck out "or the Governor of the telephone bank" after "the Secretary".

1994—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 103–354 substituted "Secretary" for "Administrator" in two places.
# EPA Registration Jacket 84229-7______________________________________________________________

Page 62 is not included in this copy.

Pages through are not included in this copy.

_______________________________________________________________

The material not included contains the following type of

information:

_____ Identity of product inert ingredients.

_____ Identity of product impurities.

_____ Description of the product manufacturing process.

_____ Description of quality control procedures.

_____ Identity of the source of product ingredients.

_____ Sales or other commercial/financial information.

_____ A draft product label.

__X__ The product confidential statement of formula.

_____ Information about a pending registration action.

_____ FIFRA registration data.

_____ The document is a duplicate of page(s) _______.

_____ The document is not responsive to the request.

_____ Proprietary information pertaining to the chemical

composition of an inert ingredient provided by the source

of the ingredient.

_____ Attorney-Client Privilege.

_____ Claimed Confidential by submitter upon submission to the

Agency.

_____ Internal Deliberative Information.

* The information not included is generally considered confidential by product

registrants. If you have any questions, please contact the individual who

prepared the response to your request.

_________________________________________________________________
Exhibit 23.4

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration
Statement on Form F-3 of our report dated April 24, 2002 relating to the
consolidated financial statements of Ben Nederland Holding B.V., which appears
in Deutsche Telekom AG's Annual Report on Form 20-F/A for the year ended
December 31, 2003. We also consent to the references to us under the headings
"Experts" in such Registration Statement.

September 6, 2004


PricewaterhouseCoopers Accountants N.V.
Amsterdam, The Netherlands
#### 1371.106 Delivery and shifting of the vessel.

Insert clause 1352.271-75, *Delivery and Shifting of the Vessel,* in all solicitations and contracts for ship repair to be performed at the contractor's facility.
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 9 (Thursday, January 14, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 3230]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-00683]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Highway Administration


Rescinding the Notice of Intent for a Supplemental Environmental 
Impact Statement: Lafourche Parish, LA

AGENCY: Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), DOT.

ACTION: Rescind notice of intent.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FHWA is issuing this notice to advise the public that 
effective immediately, we are rescinding a Notice of Intent (NOI) to 
prepare a Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (SEIS) for the 
2002 LA 1 Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) in Lafourche 
Parish, LA.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Charles Bolinger, Division 
Administrator, Louisiana Division, Federal Highway Administration, 5304 
Flanders Drive, Suite A, Baton Rouge, LA 70808 Telephone: 225.757.7600.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FHWA, in cooperation with the Louisiana 
Department of Transportation and Development (LADOTD), issued a NOI on 
March 15, 2017, to prepare a Supplemental Environmental Impact 
Statement (SEIS) to study local access modifications and right-of-way 
impacts to roadway approaches beyond the initial Final Environmental 
Impact Statement (FEIS) project limits.
    The FHWA has determined, in conjunction with LADOTD, the NOI for 
the SEIS shall be rescinded due to the numerous impacts to traffic and 
right-of-way beyond the initial project limits identified in the FEIS. 
The project layout as previously identified in the FEIS will remain as 
the selected alternative.

    Issued on: January 11, 2021.
Charles Bolinger,
Division Administrator, Louisiana Division, Baton Rouge, Louisiana.
[FR Doc. 2021-00683 Filed 1-13-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-22-P
#### § 1909.11 Notification of decision.

The Executive Secretary shall inform the requester of the final CIA decision and, if favorable, shall manage the access for such period of time as deemed required, but in no event for more than two years unless renewed by the Senior Agency Official, in accordance with the requirements of this part for waiving need-to-know and granting access in the first instance.
## U nit edSta tes C ou rt o f A pp eal s For t h e Firs t C ircu it

No. 07-1169 VLADIMIR KOZAK, Petitioner,
v . ALBERTO GONZÁLES, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Respondent.

ERRATA SHEET The opinion of this Court issued on September 14, 2007, is amended as follows: On page 2, line 6, "July 7" should read "July 5."
P. 1 

# OAR Box 1837 Prepped by Keeia Richards



### Document

Number: 

# 182 ) IV-E-1 6 Docket Number: 

# A-84-3 3

Printed 11/14/20083:48:12 PM

Sheet 182 of 238P. 2 

# -JA . A-!N-3 3 IV-E-lf c jf****- UNITE D STATE S ENVIRONMENTA LPROTECTIO N AGENC Y XPRO ^

WASHINGTON , D.C
. 2046 0
January13 , 198 9 MEMORANDU

M OFFIC E O F GENERA L COUNSE L SUBJECT : Meetin g wit hDepartmen t o f Interio r FROM : GregoryB . Foote* "

Attorney , Ai r an

d R"a"<iiatio

n Divisio n TO : Centra l Docke t Sectio n (LE-131 )

Docke t No . A-84-3 3 I n reviewing the docke t entrie s fo r thi s rulemaking , I realize d tha t I inadvertentl yneglecte d t o submi t t o yo u a memorializatio n o f a meetin g betwee n EPAan d th e Departmen t o f Interio r (DOI ) regarding EPA' s propose d surfac e coa l mine s (SCM ) rule . Th e purpos e o f thi s memorandu mi s t o correc t tha t oversight . Th e meetin g wa s hel d o n Septembe r 24 , 1987 . Alis t o f th e participant s i s attached . A t the meeting , DO I an d EPA representative s discusse d technica l an d polic yissue s regarding the likel yimpac t o f an EPAdecisio n t o adop t Alternativ e IV o r some variatio n o f i t (includin g visibilit yimpact s fro mSCMs) , an d regardin g th e exten t o f DOI' s regulatio n o f SCMs . N o ne w factua l informatio n wa s submitted . Attachmen tP. 3



# Sltr&ce- (2> a 

# {

M«Z? Afafa** 

# ftkh G^kerir- BM-osc?ez-76a6 (UlCfirr^A . Pou^O " IX*!/ ASLHttf 34 3 - J,-73<

/ (UHOL. 

# C.L.*tfcy£>oz/soLj&>M z<f 3 

# - YC 

# , 7/ 

# , Jo_l Yudjos tio//sol/[)Sn 3/3-<T3V 7

CU*'JtytLtrtrzu OOL/SOL/OCI^ 

### 3 7 3 ~ Y 90<$ f^dvuy &iykX^J

Pot

/ FTA- 3v*>-<?l/S'l 

# SX^^^Ta^r

^o-xy&u 3WW3
EXHIBIT 10.2

Offer letter for Thomas M. Rohrs

Tom, the Board of Directors of Electroglas is pleased to make for the following offer for the Chairman, CEO position.

Base Salary:  $310,000 per year

At Risk Bonus:  $200K with upside to $230K if all milestones are met, the exact amount of such bonus to be determined by the Board based upon Mr. Rohrs achieving certain performance criteria and Electroglas achieving specific financial goals, including the satisfaction of certain Electroglas operating profit goals, and other corporate goals, in each case as determined by the Board.

Change of control/severance agreement of 24 months (salary plus bonus), triggered upon both a successful completion of a board and shareholder approved acquisition and a subsequent not for cause termination of your services as CEO, within 12 months after the change of control.  The terms of the severance agreement will comply with Internal Revenue Code Section 409A.

200,000 options, grant is effective 2 days after public announcement of the change in CEO, the exercise price will be determined in accordance with the plan on the effective grant date and vested on the normal Electroglas vesting schedule, and fully accelerated upon a change of control.

250,000 options, grant is effective 2 days after public announcement of the change in CEO, the exercise price will be determined in accordance with the plan on the effective grant date.  125,000 cliff vested after 2 consecutive quarter of positive operating income measured on a GAAP basis, and 125,000 cliff vested after the majority of the Board agrees that your performance as CEO of Electroglas has improved shareholder value.  This review of performance will be 6 months after your acceptance of this offer.  These options would be also fully accelerate vesting upon a change of control.

	
  John Osborne
  	
  Thomas M.   Rohrs
  
	
  Lead   Director
  	
   
  
	
   
  	
   
  
	
   
  	
   
  
	
  /s/ John   Osborne
  	
  /s/ Thomas   M. Rohrs
§ 750.44 Claims not payable. ( a ) Any claim for damage, loss, destruction, injury, or death which was proximately caused, in whole or in part, by any negligence or wrongful act on the part of the claimant, or his agent or employee, unless the law of the place where the act or omission complained of occurred would permit recovery from a private individual under like circumstances, and then only to the extent permitted by the law.
( b ) Any claim resulting from action by the enemy or resulting directly or indirectly from any act by armed forces engaged in combat.
( c ) Any claim for reimbursement of medical, hospital, or burial expenses to the extent already paid by the U.S. Government.
( d ) Any claim cognizable under: ( 1 ) Military Personnel and Civilian Employees' Claims Act, as amended. 31 U.S.C. 3721.
( 2 ) Foreign Claims Act. 10 U.S.C. 2734.
( 3 ) 10 U.S.C. 7622, relating to admiralty claims. See part 752 of this Chapter.
( 4 ) Federal Tort Claims Act. 28 U.S.C. 2671, 2672, and 2674-2680.
( 5 ) International Agreements Claims Act. 10 U.S.C. 2734a and 2734b.
( 6 ) Federal Employees' Compensation Act. 5 U.S.C. 8101-8150.
( 7 ) Longshore and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act. 33 U.S.C. 901-950.
( e ) Any claim for damage to or loss or destruction of real or personal property founded in written contract [except as provided in § 750.43(b) (2) and (3)].
( f ) Any claim for rent of real or personal property [except as provided in § 750.43(b) (2) and (3)].
( g ) Any claim involving infringement of patents.
( h ) Any claim for damage, loss, or destruction of mail prior to delivery by the Postal Service to authorized DON personnel or occurring due to the fault of, or while in the hands of, bonded personnel.
( i ) Any claim by a national, or corporation controlled by a national, of a country in armed conflict with the United States, or an ally of such country, unless the claimant is determined to be friendly to the United States.
( j ) Any claim for personal injury or death of a member of the Armed Forces or civilian employee incident to his service. 10 U.S.C. 2733(b)(3).
( k ) Any claim for damage to or loss of bailed property when bailor specifically assumes such risk.
( l ) Any claim for taking private real property by a continuing trespass or by technical trespass such as overflights of aircraft.
( m ) Any claim based solely on compassionate grounds.
( n ) Any claim to which the exceptions in 28 U.S.C. 2680 apply.
[57 FR 4722, Feb. 7, 1992, as amended at 72 FR 53420, Sept. 19, 2007]
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

EASTERN DIVISION

BUBBLE GUM PRODUCTIONS, LLC, ) 

 ) 

Plaintiff, ) Case Number: 1:12-cv-00595 

 ) 

v. ) Hon. Joan H. Lefkow 

 ) 

DOES 1 – 37, ) 

 ) 

Defendants. ) 

NOTICE OF MOTION

 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on the 12th day of April 2012 at 8:30 a.m., or as soon 

thereafter as counsel may be heard, the undersigned shall appear before the Honorable Judge 

Joan H. Lefkow, or any judge sitting in her stead, in Courtroom 1925 or the courtroom usually 

occupied by her in the Everett McKinley Dirksen Federal Courthouse, 219 South Dearborn 

Street, Chicago, Illinois, 60604, and then and there shall present JOHN DOE 3’S MOTION TO 

DISMISS, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, TO SEVER DEFENDANTS AND QUASH 

SUBPOENA, copies of which have been served upon you. 

 Respectfully submitted, 

JOHN DOE 3 

Dated: April 9, 2012 By: s/ Scott R. Kaspar 

Scott R. Kaspar (ARDC #6284921) 

TOLPIN & PARTNERS, PC 

11 South LaSalle Street, Suite 2900 

Chicago, Illinois 60603 

Phone: (312) 698-8971 

Fax: (312) 803-9602 

Case: 1:12-cv-00595 Document #: 20 Filed: 04/09/12 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:135
2

Email: Scott@tolpinlaw.com 

Attorneys for Defendant 

JOHN DOE 3 

Case: 1:12-cv-00595 Document #: 20 Filed: 04/09/12 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:136
3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

 I, Scott R. Kaspar, an attorney, hereby certify that on April 9, 2012, I caused to be filed 

electronically NOTICE OF MOTION with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system, 

which will send an electronic copy of the foregoing to all counsel of record and constitutes 

proper service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(b)(2)(D) pursuant to L.R. 5.9 of the Northern District of 

Illinois.

 

 /s/ Scott R. Kaspar 

 

Case: 1:12-cv-00595 Document #: 20 Filed: 04/09/12 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:137
#### Eugene Di Lorenzo, Respondent, v. Cimmaron Ranch, Inc., Appellant.

Judgment in favor of plaintiff upon a verdict of a jury, unanimously reversed, on the law and the facts, the verdict vacated, and the complaint dismissed, on the law, with costs to appellant. On August 8, 1954, plaintiff was injured when he was thrown to the ground by a steer he was riding in a rodeo show produced by defendant at a dude ranch in Putnam Valley, New York. While on the ground, it is claimed that the steer hooked plaintiff in his right side with his horns. Plaintiff had engaged in rodeo contests for about five years before 1954; and in July of 1954 — one month before the contest in which plaintiff was injured — he had been in a contest at defendant’s dude ranch. In our opinion, plaintiff failed to show by any competent evidence that defendant had failed to exercise that standard of care which it owed to plaintiff as a professional rodeo rider competing for prize money. Plaintiff attempted to show negligence in that the horns of the steer had not been altered, shortened or tipped and by the absence of *“*clowns ” in the arena to divert or distract the steer after a rider had been thrown. The evidence as to custom and usage to establish the standard of care to be observed by defendant was inadequate, as a matter of law, to prove negligence. Moreover, under the facts of this ease, *631we conclude that, as a matter of law, plaintiff, as a professional rodeo contestant, assumed the risks of the sport and was guilty of contributory negligence. But even were we not to dismiss the complaint, we would nevertheless reverse the judgment and grant a new trial because the verdict on the question of negligence and assumption of risk is against the weight of the credible evidence. Moreover, we hold it was error to admit into evidence the Rules of the Rodeo Cowboys’ Association since there was no evidence that defendant or any of its employees belonged to the association or that the rules generally governed the production or operation of rodeos such as were conducted by defendant at its dude ranch. Settle order on notice. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Valente, McNally, Stevens and Steuer, JJ.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of R.H. Donnelley
Inc. for the period ending September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned
officers hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to such
officers knowledge:  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of R.H. Donnelley Corporation as of the
dates and for the periods expressed in the Report. /s/ David C. Swanson
    
    /s/ Steven M. BlondyDavid C. Swanson
    
    Steven M. BlondyPresident and Chief Executive Officer
    
    SVP and Chief Financial OfficerNovember 9, 2004
    
    November 9, 2004
 The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate
disclosure document. 83
#### § 241.7 Termination.

An assignment may, at any time and for any reason be terminated by the DoD or the private sector organization concerned.
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

___________________________

No. 02

- 18

- 00133

- CV

___________________________

On Appeal from the 43rd District Court

Parker County, Texas

Trial Court No. CV17

- 1353

Before Kerr, Pittman, and Birdwell, JJ.

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion 

### E STATE OF 

### F LOELLA 

### F LORENCE 

### W ILLIAMS



### , D ECEASED2 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT

We have considered appellant s’ “Unopposed Motion for V oluntary Dismissal

of Appeal.” We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P.

42. 1(a)(1), 43.2(f).

Appellant s must pay all costs of this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d), 43.4.

Per Curiam

Delivered: October 1 8 , 2018