alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL

THE GENERAL COUNSEL

TO: Executive Officer 

Office of the General Counsel

FROM: The General Counsel

SUBJECT: Delegation of Authority to Certify Fund Availability

I. DELEGATION

Under the authority vested in me by a delegation to all Principal Officers from the Chief 

Financial Officer, EL/GEN/1, certified on December 3, 1998, I hereby delegate to you, 

and to anyone serving for you in an acting capacity, the authority to certify funds 

available for administering the functions and responsibilities of the Office of the General 

Counsel. This authority is issued pursuant to 31 U.S.C. §1108.

Unless otherwise noted in future delegations of authority, amendments to the authority 

delegated herein are included in the scope of this delegation.

II. RESERVATIONS: None.

III. REDELEGATION

This authority may not be redelegated

IV. CERTIFICATION AND EFFECTIVE DATE

This delegation is effective upon certification by the Department's Principal Delegations 

Control Officer and supersedes all previous delegations of this authority. I hereby ratify 

actions within the scope of this delegation taken by you prior to the date of certification.

________/s/____________

 Charles Rose

OGC Clearance and Date: /s/ David Berthiaume, 8/27/2009

Certified Date: 8/28/2009

Departmental Delegations Control Officer: /s/ Naty G. Beetle

Control Number: EG/EG1/120
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS, EASTERN DIVISION

PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, )

successor to National City Bank )

of the Midwest, )

) Case No. 12 CV 206

Plaintiff, )

) Assigned Judge:

v. ) Hon. Robert M. Dow, Jr.

)

HIMA-L JAIKRIT GILBERT CONVENIENCE,) Magistrate Judge:

INC. and AEKTA R. PATEL, ) Hon. Sheila M. Finnegan

)

Defendants. )

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR ENTRY OF A JUDGMENT

NOW COMES the Plaintiff, PNC Bank, National Association,

successor to National City Bank, successor to National City Bank of

the Midwest (“Plaintiff” or “PNC”), by and through its attorneys,

Thomas J. Dillon, Wendy Kaleta Skrobin, Timothy J. Somen and

McFadden & Dillon, P.C., and hereby moves this Court for entry of

a Judgment in favor of Plaintiff. In support thereof, Plaintiff

submits its Affidavit of Proof.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Wendy Kaleta Skrobin 

One of the attorneys for

plaintiff, PNC Bank, National

Association, successor to

National City Bank of the

Midwest

Thomas J. Dillon (ARDC#3124223)

t.dillon@mcdillaw.com

Wendy Kaleta Skrobin (ARDC#6226119)

w.skrobin@mcdillaw.com

Timothy J. Somen (ARDC#6279438)

t.somen@mcdillaw.com

McFadden & Dillon, P.C.

120 S. LaSalle Street

Suite 1335

Chicago, Illinois 60603

(312) 201-8300

Page 1 of 1
1246.705-70 Limitations—restrictions. The following restrictions are applicable to DOT contracts: ( a ) The contractor shall not be required to honor the warranty on any property furnished by the Government except for— ( 1 ) Defects in installation; and
( 2 ) Installation or modification in such a manner that invalidates a warranty provided by the manufacturer of the property.
( b ) Any warranty obtained shall specifically exclude coverage of damage in time of war (combat damage) or national emergency.
( c ) Contracting officers shall not include in a warranty clause any terms that require the contractor to incur liability for loss, damage, or injury to third parties.
"EXHIBIT 21"

List of Subsidiaries

Subsidiaries of International Bancshares Corporation

|Name                       |  | Business              |  | % of Ownership |  
|-------------------------- |  | --------------------- |  | -------------- | -
|IBC Subsidiary Corporation |  | Bank Holding Company  |  | 100            | %
|IBC Life Insurance Company |  | Credit Life Insurance |  | 100            | %
|IBC Trading Company        |  | Export Trading        |  | 100            | %
|IBC Capital Corporation    |  | Investments           |  | 100            | %
|IB Capital Trust I         |  | Capital Securities    |  | 100            | %
|IB Capital Trust II        |  | Capital Securities    |  | 100            | %
|IB Capital Trust III       |  | Capital Securities    |  | 100            | %
|IB Capital Trust IV        |  | Capital Securities    |  | 100            | %
|IB Capital Trust V         |  | Capital Securities    |  | 100            | %
|IB Capital Trust VI        |  | Capital Securities    |  | 100            | %

Subsidiaries of IBC Subsidiary Corporation

|Name                                        |  | Business                        |  | % of Ownership |  
|------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------- |  | -------------- | -
|International Bank of Commerce              |  | State Bank                      |  | 100            | %
|Commerce Bank                               |  | State Bank                      |  | 100            | %
|International Bank of Commerce, Zapata      |  | State Bank                      |  | 100            | %
|International Bank of Commerce, Brownsville |  | State Bank                      |  | 100            | %
|Gulfstar Group I, Ltd.                      |  | Investment and Merchant Banking |  | 70             | %
|Gulfstar Group II, Ltd.                     |  | Investment Banking              |  | 70             | %

---

QuickLinks
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 96-3676

___________

United States of America, *

 *

Appellant, *

 * Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

 * District of Minnesota.

Lee Otis Hall, *

 * [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellee. *

___________

 Submitted: March 17, 1997

 Filed: March 25, 1997

___________

Before HANSEN, MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

The government appeals the district court's sua sponte grant to Lee

Otis Hall of a downward departure below the statutory mandatory minimum,

after Hall pleaded guilty to possessing cocaine with intent to distribute,

in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). We reverse, and remand for

resentencing.

The government declined to move for a downward departure under 18

U.S.C. § 3553(e) because Hall had rebuffed its invitation to cooperate in

the prosecution of his co-conspirators, one of whom was his stepson. After

acknowledging the propriety of the government's decision, however, the

district court sua sponte granted a 19-month departure below the statutory

mandatory minimum. 
-2-

We conclude the district court had no authority to depart below the

mandatory minimum. Neither the court nor Hall suggest that Hall provided

substantial assistance warranting departure under section 3553(e). Cf.

United States v. Polanco, 53 F.3d 893, 897 (8th Cir. 1996) (reversing

district court's downward departure below five-year mandatory minimum where

government had not filed section 3553(e) motion and failure to do so was

neither arbitrary, in bad faith, nor unconstitutional). Likewise, as Hall

had at least two criminal history points, the district court had no

authority under section 18 U.S.C. § 3553(f) to grant a downward departure.

See 18 U.S.C. § 3553(f) (sentencing court may depart below mandatory

minimum if defendant does not have more than one criminal history point).

Accordingly, we reverse the district court and remand for

resentencing. 

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Chapter 2
§ 75.2 Applicability. This part applies to: ( a ) Service members who have family members with special needs as described in this part.
( b ) All DoD civilian employees in overseas locations and selectees for overseas positions who have family members with special needs as described in this part.
§ 77.701-3 Grounding wires; capacity. Where grounding wires are used to ground metallic sheaths, armors, conduits, frames, casings, and other metallic enclosures, such grounding wires will be approved if: ( a ) Where the power conductor used is No. 6 A.W.G., or larger, the cross-sectional area of the grounding wire is at least one-half the cross-sectional area of the power conductor.
( b ) Where the power conductor used is less than No. 6 A.W.G., the cross-sectional area of the grounding wire is equal to the cross-sectional area of the power conductor.
##### 



Exhibit 12.1
 
 Years ended December 31,2006
    
    
    2005
    
    
    2004
    
    
    2003
    
    
    2002Fixed charges:Interest
    
    $
    166,608
    
    
    $
    146,062
    
    
    $
    88,901
    
    
    $
    113,385
    
    
    $
    151,878Eliminate BankAtlantic Bancorp and
and Levitt
    
    
    (166,578
    )
    
    
    (144,980
    )
    
    
    (87,730
    )
    
    
    (112,222
    )
    
    
    (150,725
    )Pre tax 5% Preferred stock dividends
    
    
    1,221
    
    
    
    1,221
    
    
    
    638
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    $
    1,251
    
    
    $
    2,303
    
    
    $
    1,809
    
    
    $
    1,163
    
    
    $
    1,153Earnings (loss):Income from continuing operations before income tax
    
    $
    12,179
    
    
    $
    146,553
    
    
    $
    173,326
    
    
    $
    84,724
    
    
    $
    54,956Eliminate BankAtlantic Bancorp and Levitt
    
    
    (19,043
    )
    
    
    (155,225
    )
    
    
    (174,890
    )
    
    
    (90,455
    )
    
    
    (59,311
    )Eliminate other partnerships
    
    
    67
    
    
    
    14
    
    
    
    (4,114
    )
    
    
    3,213
    
    
    
    1,427BankAtlantic
Bancorp/BankAtlantic and Levitt dividends
    
    
    2,350
    
    
    
    2,191
    
    
    
    1,925
    
    
    
    1,686
    
    
    
    1,581Fixed charges
    
    
    1,251
    
    
    
    2,303
    
    
    
    1,809
    
    
    
    1,163
    
    
    
    1,1535% Preferred stock dividends
    
    
    (750
    )
    
    
    (750
    )
    
    
    (392
    )
    
    
    
    
    
    
    $
    (3,946
    )
    
    $
    (4,914
    )
    
    $
    (2,336
    )
    
    $
    331
    
    
    $
    (194
    )Ratio
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    0.28
    
    
    
    Coverage deficiency
    
    $
    5,197
    
    
    $
    7,217
    
    
    $
    4,145
    
    
    $
    
    
    
    $
    1,347
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

October 25, 2019

No. 04-19-00539-CV

Cristina PADILLA,

Appellant

v.

RED LOBSTER HOSPITALITY, LLC,

Appellee

From the 57th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016-CI-21243

Honorable Antonia Arteaga, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellant filed a notice of appeal on August 9, 2019. On August 30, 2019, we issued an 

order questioning our jurisdiction over this appeal. We noted the clerk’s record did not contain a 

signed judgment disposing of all parties and claims. We suspended all appellate deadlines 

pending our determination of jurisdiction.

On October 23, 2019, the trial court clerk filed a supplemental clerk’s record that 

contains a judgment signed by the trial court on October 2, 2019. The judgment disposes of all 

parties and claims. Therefore, we conclude that we have jurisdiction over this appeal. 

Our previous order suspending appellate deadlines is lifted. The reporter’s record was 

filed on October 24, 2019. The appellant’s brief is due on or before November 25, 2019.

_________________________________

Irene Rios, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 25th day of October, 2019.

___________________________________

Luz Estrada,

Chief Deputy Clerk
### §2715. Certification of organizations; required contents of report as criteria

The eligibility of any organization to represent commercial egg producers of any egg producing area of the United States to request the issuance of an order under section 2704 of this title, and to participate in the making of nominations under section 2707(b) of this title shall be certified by the Secretary. Certification shall be based, in addition to other available information, upon a factual report submitted by the organization which shall contain information deemed relevant and specified by the Secretary for the making of such determination, including, but not limited to, the following:

(a) Geographic territory covered by the organization's active membership.

(b) Nature and size of the organization's active membership, proportion of total of such active membership accounted for by producers of commercial eggs, a chart showing the egg production by State in which the organization has members, and the volume of commercial eggs produced by the organization's active membership in each such State,

(c) The extent to which the commercial egg producer membership of such organization is represented in setting the organization's policies,

(d) Evidence of stability and permanency of the organization,

(e) Sources from which the organization's operating funds are derived,

(f) Functions of the organization, and

(g) The organization's ability and willingness to further the aims and objectives of this chapter: Provided, however, That the primary consideration in determining the eligibility of an organization shall be whether its commercial egg producer membership consists of a substantial number of egg producers who produce a substantial volume of commercial eggs. The Secretary shall certify any organization which he finds to be eligible under this section and his determination as to eligibility shall be final. Where more than one organization is certified in any geographic area, such organizations may caucus to determine the area's nominations under section 2707(b) of this title.

(Pub. L. 93–428, §16, Oct. 1, 1974, 88 Stat. 1178.)
### §5925d. International organic research collaboration

The Secretary, acting through the Agricultural Research Service (including the National Agricultural Library) and the Economic Research Service, shall facilitate access by research and extension professionals, farmers, and other interested persons in the United States to, and the use by those persons of, organic research conducted outside the United States.

(Pub. L. 107–171, title VII, §7408, May 13, 2002, 116 Stat. 461.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002, and not as part of subtitle H of title XVI of the Food, Agriculture, Conservation, and Trade Act of 1990 which comprises this subchapter.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Definitions

Secretary means the Secretary of Agriculture, see section 7401(1) of Pub. L. 107–171, set out as a note under section 3319b of this title.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-12-00630-CV

THE HUFF ENERGY FUND, L.P., WRH Energy Partners, LLC, William R. “Bill” Huff, 

Rick D’Angelo, and Riley-Huff Energy Group, LLC,

Appellants

v.

LONGVIEW ENERGY COMPANY,

Appellee

From the 365th Judicial District Court, Zavala County, Texas

Trial Court No. 11-09-12583-ZCVAJA

Honorable Amado J. Abascal III, Judge Presiding

BEFORE THE EN BANC COURT

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is 

REVERSED and judgment is RENDERED that Longview Energy Company take nothing.

It is ORDERED that appellants The Huff Energy Fund, L.P., WRH Energy Partners, LLC, 

William R. “Bill” Huff, Rick D’Angelo, and Riley-Huff Energy Group, LLC, recover their costs 

of this appeal from appellee Longview Energy Company. 

The surety(ies) on appellants’ supersedeas bond, if any, is/are released as a matter of law.

SIGNED November 25, 2015.

_____________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice
### §7334. Repealed. Pub. L. 115–334, title II, §2814, Dec. 20, 2018, 132 Stat. 4602

Section, Pub. L. 104–127, title III, §385, Apr. 4, 1996, 110 Stat. 1016, related to flood risk reduction contracts during fiscal years 1996 through 2002.
#### John H. Meier, appellee, v. John A. Eck Company, appellant.

Gen. No. 29,505.

Action on contract for the sale of merchandise. Judgment for plaintiff. Appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. George A. Curran, Judge, presiding. Heard in the second division *628of this court for the first district at the October term, 1924.

Reversed and remanded.

Opinion filed March 3, 1925.

Stewart Reed Brown, for appellant.

Hart E. Baker, for appellee.

Mr. Justice Gridley

delivered the opinion of the court.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

)

Deborah Jackson, et al )

)

Plaintiff(s), )

)

v. ) Case No. 11 C 9288

)

Payday Financial, LLC, et al )

) Hon. Charles P. Kocoras

)

Defendant(s). )

 ORDER

The Clerk of the Court is directed to supplement the record on appeal by 

transmitting to the Court of Appeals, this Court’s Finding of Fact (Doc [95]), Plaintiffs’

Statement of Relevant Facts, and on Further Discovery Required on Limited Remand by 

Court of Appeals (Doc [82]), and Defendants’ Position Regarding Proceedings Under the 

Seventh Circuit’s Remand Order (Doc [83]). 

Date: August 28, 2013

CHARLES P. KOCORAS

United States District Judge

Case: 1:11-cv-09288 Document #: 96 Filed: 08/28/13 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:1812
EXHIBIT 10.33b


                        SECOND AMENDMENT TO 8% TERM NOTE

      SECOND AMENDMENT, dated as of December 19, 2005, TO 8% TERM NOTE, dated
April 5, 2005, as amended on September 30, 2005, made by and between Delta
Mutual, Inc., a Delaware corporation, with its principal offices located at 111
North Branch Street, Sellersville, PA 18960 (the "Borrower") and ______________
(the "Holder"). Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined herein
shall have the meaning assigned to such term in the Original Note.

      WHEREAS, the Borrower and the Holder are parties to that certain 8% Term
Note, dated April 5, 2005, as amended on September 30, 2005, (the "Original
Note") pursuant to which the Borrower has borrowed the amount of $___________
from the Holder;

      WHEREAS, the Original Note provides that the Maturity Date shall be
January 3, 2006; and

      WHEREAS, the Borrower and the Holder have agreed to extend the Maturity
Date and to amend Section 1.4 of the Original Note in order to provide the
Borrower with additional time to secure financing; and

      WHEREAS, in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Original Note,
the Borrower and the Holder hereby approve the amendment of the Original Note as
set forth herein.

      NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the mutual covenants
contained herein, the parties agree as follows:

      3. By their respective execution of this Agreement, the Borrower and the
Holder agree that Section 1.4 of the Original Note is hereby amended to read in
its entirety as follows: "Maturity Date" shall mean April 3, 2006.

      4. Except as expressly provided herein, the Original Note shall continue
in full force and effect.


      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Borrower and the Holder have executed this Second
Amendment as of the date first written above.

                  DELTA MUTUAL INC.                 __________________________




            By: _______________________        By: ___________________________
                  Peter F. Russo
                   President & CEO


                                       55
```

[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 8 (Wednesday, January 13, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2697-2698]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-00567]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 332-579]

Lobsters: Effects of the Canada-EU Trade Agreement on the U.S. 
Industry Termination of Investigation

AGENCY: United States International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice of termination of investigation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to a letter from the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR) 
received on December 23, 2020, withdrawing his request of July 29, 2020 
that the Commission conduct an investigation and prepare a report that 
details any negative effects of the Comprehensive Economic and Trade 
Agreement between Canada and the European Union on the United States 
lobster industry, the Commission has terminated Investigation No. 332-
579: Lobsters: Effects of the Canada-EU Trade Agreement on the U.S. 
Industry, and will not release a report.
    The USTR requested the investigation and report under authority 
delegated by the President and pursuant to section 332(g) of the Tariff 
Act of 1930. In his letter withdrawing the request, the USTR stated 
that the European Union's recent removal of tariffs on imported 
lobsters eliminated the need for a report analyzing any disadvantages 
to the U.S. lobster industry caused by the prior agreement between 
Canada and the European Union.

DATES: 
    July 29, 2020: Receipt of request for the investigation.
    October 1, 2020: Public hearing.
    December 23, 2020: Receipt of request to terminate the 
investigation.
    [Publication in Federal Register]: Termination of investigation.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Project Leader Christopher Robinson 
(202-205-2602 or [email protected]) or Deputy Project 
Leader Amelia Shister (202-205-2047 or [email protected]) for 
information specific to this investigation. For information on the 
legal aspects of these investigations,

[[Page 2698]]

contact William Gearhart of the Commission's Office of the General 
Counsel (202-205-3091 or [email protected]). The media should 
contact Margaret O'Laughlin, Office of External Relations (202-205-1819 
or [email protected]). Hearing-impaired individuals may 
obtain information on this matter by contacting the Commission's TDD 
terminal at 202-205-1810. General information concerning the Commission 
may also be obtained by accessing its internet server (http://www.usitc.gov). Persons with mobility impairments who will need special 
assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the 
Office of the Secretary at 202-205-2000.

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: January 8, 2021.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2021-00567 Filed 1-12-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
```
### §448. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 448 was editorially reclassified as section 667g–1 of Title 16, Conservation.