alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1


SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER




(1)
    
    The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended
August 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition, and results of operations
of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the
Report.


| |                                                   |  |  | 
| | ------------------------------------------------- |  |  | 
| |                                                   | 
| | /s/ Keith S. Walters                              | 
| | Keith S. Walters                                  | 
| | Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer | 
| | Date: September 25, 2009                          | 

The foregoing Certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350; it is not
being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date
hereof, regardless of any general incorporation languages in such filing.
#### Sol Vogel et al. v. Anna Medlin et al.

Motion for leave to dispense with printing granted only insofar as to dispense with the printing in the record on appeal of the exhibits on condition that the originals or photostats are filed with this court on or before the Wednesday preceding the first day of the term for which the appeal is noticed for argument, and to omit from the printed record on appeal substituted pleadings and duplicates of papers which appear in earlier parts of the record. In all other respects, the motion is denied. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Valente, Stevens, Eager and Steuer, JJ.
Case: 1:12-cr-00087 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/06/12 Page 1 of 11 PageID #:1
Case: 1:12-cr-00087 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/06/12 Page 2 of 11 PageID #:2
Case: 1:12-cr-00087 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/06/12 Page 3 of 11 PageID #:3
Case: 1:12-cr-00087 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/06/12 Page 4 of 11 PageID #:4
Case: 1:12-cr-00087 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/06/12 Page 5 of 11 PageID #:5
Case: 1:12-cr-00087 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/06/12 Page 6 of 11 PageID #:6
Case: 1:12-cr-00087 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/06/12 Page 7 of 11 PageID #:7
Case: 1:12-cr-00087 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/06/12 Page 8 of 11 PageID #:8
Case: 1:12-cr-00087 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/06/12 Page 9 of 11 PageID #:9
Case: 1:12-cr-00087 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/06/12 Page 10 of 11 PageID #:10
Case: 1:12-cr-00087 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/06/12 Page 11 of 11 PageID #:11
#### 1352.216-72 Determination of award fee.

As prescribed in 48 CFR 1316.405-2, insert the following clause:

# Determination of Award Fee (Date)

Based upon the quality of its performance and the results of the Government's performance evaluation, the contractor may earn an award fee.

(a) The total amount of award fee available under this contract is assigned according to the following:

[Insert appropriate information]

(b) A Performance Evaluation Plan shall be unilaterally established by the Government as part of the contract and used for the determination of award fees. This plan shall include the criteria that will be used to evaluate the contractor's performance and to determine the percentage of award fee (if any) available for each performance period.

(c) The criteria contained within the Performance Evaluation Plan may relate to:

(1) Quality of performance of the contract requirements;

(2) Effective management of the contract; and

(3) Cost controls.

(d) The Performance Evaluation Plan may be revised unilaterally by the Government at any time during the period of performance, however unless mutually-agreed to a revision shall not affect the current evaluation period. Notification of such changes shall be provided to the contractor [insert number] calendar days prior to the start of the evaluation period to which the change will apply.

(e) At the conclusion of each evaluation period, and in accordance with the performance evaluation plan, a determination of the amount of the award fee earned shall be made in writing to the contractor by the Government Fee Determination Official (FDO). The FDO's unilateral determination of the amount of award fee earned in any evaluation period or a determination that no fee was earned shall be conclusive.

(f) The contractor may submit a self-evaluation of its performance in an evaluation period. The FDO shall consider the self-evaluation, as the FDO deems appropriate.

(g) The contractor shall submit a voucher for payment of any earned award fee.

(End of clause)
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 668 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 668

 To nullify the effect of the recent Executive order regarding border 
                 security and immigration enforcement.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 15, 2017

 Mr. Carper (for himself, Mr. Bennet, Mr. Blumenthal, Mr. Booker, Mr. 
 Coons, Ms. Cortez Masto, Ms. Duckworth, Mr. Durbin, Mr. Franken, Mrs. 
Gillibrand, Ms. Hirono, Mr. Kaine, Mr. Leahy, Mr. Markey, Mr. Menendez, 
 Mr. Merkley, Mr. Murphy, Mrs. Murray, Mr. Reed, Mr. Sanders, Mr. Van 
Hollen, Ms. Warren, Mr. Wyden, and Ms. Harris) introduced the following 
    bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the 
                               Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To nullify the effect of the recent Executive order regarding border 
                 security and immigration enforcement.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RESCISSION.

    The provisions of Executive Order 13767 (82 Fed. Reg. 8793; January 
25, 2017), entitled ``Border Security and Immigration Enforcement 
Improvements'', are rescinded and shall not have any legal effect.

SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    This Act shall take effect as if enacted on January 25, 2017.
                                 <all>
```
### §2111. Administrative review of orders; petition; hearing; judicial review

(a) Any person subject to any order may file a written petition with the Secretary, stating that any such order or any provision of such order or any obligation imposed in connection therewith is not in accordance with law and praying for a modification thereof or to be exempted therefrom. He shall thereupon be given an opportunity for a hearing upon such petition, in accordance with regulations made by the Secretary. After such hearing, the Secretary shall make a ruling upon the prayer of such petition which shall be final, if in accordance with law.

(b) The district courts of the United States in any district in which such person is an inhabitant, or has his principal place of business, are hereby vested with jurisdiction to review such ruling, provided a complaint for that purpose is filed within twenty days from the date of the entry of such ruling. Service of process in such proceedings may be had upon the Secretary by delivering to him a copy of the complaint. If the court determines that such ruling is not in accordance with law, it shall remand such proceedings to the Secretary with directions either (1) to make such ruling as the court shall determine to be in accordance with law, or (2) to take such further proceedings as, in its opinion, the law requires. The pendency of proceedings instituted pursuant to subsection (a) of this section shall not impede, hinder, or delay the United States or the Secretary from obtaining relief pursuant to section 2112(a) of this title.

(Pub. L. 89–502, §12, July 13, 1966, 80 Stat. 284.)
Fiscal Year 2014 Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies - HAWAII

FY 2014 Title I

LEA ID District Allocation*

1500001 Hawaii County 11,142,139

1500003 Honolulu County 34,090,027

1500005 Kalawao County 0

1500007 Kauai County 2,164,584

1500009 Maui County 5,794,163

1599999 PART D SUBPART 2 0

* Actual amounts received by LEAs will be smaller than shown here due to State-level adjustments to Federal Title I allocations. States adjust

 allocations, for example, to reflect LEA boundary changes or the creation of new LEAs, including charter school LEAs, that are not accounted

 for in the statutory calculations. States also are permitted to reserve, for administration, up to 1 percent of the allocations they would receive

 if $14 billion were appropriated and generally must reserve 4 percent in fiscal year 2014 for school improvement activities. These 

 adjustments will reduce the actual amounts available.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

NEELAM UPPAL, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D16-2356

)

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed October 3, 2018.

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.130 

from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; 

Thomas H. Minkoff, Judge.

Neelum Uppal, pro se.

Kimberly S. Mello and Vitaliy Kats of 

Greenberg Traurig, P.A., Tampa; and 

Michele L. Stocker of Greenberg Traurig, 

P.A., Ft. Lauderdale, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

SILBERMAN, KELLY, and BLACK, JJ., Concur.
### §4403. Duties of Secretary of Agriculture

The Secretary of Agriculture of the United States shall be the competent authority to implement the agreement. To ensure compliance with the standards specified in the agreement, the Secretary of Agriculture may—

(1) designate appropriate organizations to inspect or test equipment, or both;

(2) issue certificates of compliance in accordance with annex 1, appendix 1, paragraph 4 of the agreement;

(3) prescribe such regulations as may be necessary to implement the agreement and administer this chapter, including, but not limited to, provision for suspending or denying the designation of any organization to inspect or test equipment and for denying the issuance of certificates of compliance as may be necessary to ensure compliance with the provisions of this chapter and the regulations issued thereunder;

(4) make periodic onsite inspections of facilities and procedures used by those seeking certificates of compliance and by organizations designated to test or inspect equipment under this chapter;

(5) require submission of reports by those seeking certificates of compliance and by organizations designated to test or inspect equipment under this chapter;

(6) require maintenance of records by those seeking certificates of compliance and by organizations designated to test or inspect equipment under this chapter, such records to be made available to the Secretary upon request;

(7) inform contracting parties, through the Secretary of State of the United States, of all general measures taken in connection with the implementation of the agreement; and

(8) take such other action as may be considered appropriate to implement the agreement and administer this chapter.

(Pub. L. 97–325, §4, Oct. 15, 1982, 96 Stat. 1604.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in pars. (3) to (6) and (8), was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 97–325, Oct. 15, 1982, 96 Stat. 1603, known as the International Carriage of Perishable Foodstuffs Act, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 4401 of this title and Tables.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Timothy Glass, Appellant.

[833 NYS2d 421]

Judgment of resentence, Supreme Court, New York County (Roger Hayes, J.), rendered on or about August 24, 2005, unanimously affirmed. No opinion. Order filed. Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P, Sullivan, Sweeny, Malone and Kavanagh, JJ.
### §7654. Food Safety Research Information Office

#### (a) Establishment

The Secretary of Agriculture shall establish a Food Safety Research Information Office at the National Agricultural Library.

#### (b) Purpose

The Office shall provide to the research community and the general public information on publicly funded, and to the maximum extent practicable, privately funded food safety research initiatives for the purpose of—

(1) preventing unintended duplication of food safety research; and

(2) assisting the executive and legislative branches of the Federal Government and private research entities to assess food safety research needs and priorities.

#### (c) Cooperation

The Office shall carry out this section in cooperation with the National Institutes of Health, the Food and Drug Administration, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, public institutions, and, on a voluntary basis, private research entities.

(Pub. L. 105–185, title VI, §615, June 23, 1998, 112 Stat. 606; Pub. L. 107–171, title VII, §7301(a), (b)(1), May 13, 2002, 116 Stat. 454.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2002—Pub. L. 107–171 struck out "and national conference" after "Information Office" in section catchline, struck out subsec. (a) designation and heading, redesignated pars. (1) to (3) of former subsec. (a) as subsecs. (a) to (c), respectively, and subpars. (A) and (B) of former par. (2) as pars. (1) and (2) of subsec. (b), respectively, realigned margins, substituted "this section" for "this subsection" in subsec. (c), and struck out former subsecs. (b) and (c) which related to national conference and annual workshops and food safety report, respectively.
(September 19, 1963)

#### Robert Ames v. Alfred Knobler.

Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted solely on the question as to the sufficiency of' the counterclaim. Settle order on notice. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, McNally, Eager and Bastow, JJ.
EXHIBIT (15)

ENSERCH Corporation:


We have made a review in accordance with standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants of the unaudited interim condensed
consolidated financial information of ENSERCH Corporation and subsidiary
companies for the period from the acquisition date through September 30, 1997
and for periods from January 1, and July 1, 1997 through the acquisition date
and the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 1996
(Predecessor Company) as indicated in our report dated November 12, 1997;
because we did not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on that
information.

We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included in your
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 1997, is
incorporated by reference in Registration Statement No. 33-52525 on Form S-3
for ENSERCH Corporation.

We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c)
under the Securities Act, is not considered a part of the Registration
Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or
certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that
Act.



DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Dallas, Texas
November 13, 1997
Exhibit 31(g)

|CERTIFICATION                                                                                            
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                         
|                                                                                                         
|I, JAMES H. MILLER, the principal executive officer of PPL Montana, LLC (the "registrant"), certify that:
|                                                                                                         
|1.                                                                                                       
|                                                                                                         
|2.                                                                                                       
|                                                                                                         
|3.                                                                                                       
|                                                                                                         
|4.                                                                                                       
|                                                                                                         
|                                                                                                         
|                                                                                                         
|                                                                                                         
|                                                                                                         
|                                                                                                         
|                                                                                                         
|5.                                                                                                       
|                                                                                                         
|                                                                                                         
|                                                                                                         
|                                                                                                         
|                                                                                                         
|                                                                                                         
|                                                                                                         
|Date:  March 1, 2004                                                                                     
|
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-80,123-01

EX PARTE JACK MANISCALCO JR., Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 11-DCR-56387HC1 IN THE 434 DISTRICT COURT TH

FROM FORT BEND COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N

This is a post-conviction application for a writ of habeas corpus forwarded to this Court

pursuant to TEX.CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07, § 3, et seq. Applicant was convicted of the state jail

felony offense of interference with an emergency call, and punishment was assessed at six months’

confinement. The Fourteenth Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. Manisculco v. State, No.

14-11-00594-CR (Tex. App.–Houston [14 ] March 19, 2013). th

The habeas application was filed in the trial court on June 25, 2013 and this Court received

it on August 22, 2013. On September 18, 2013, this Court issued an opinion granting relief. 

However, on September 4, 2013, while the application was still pending in this Court, Applicant was
released from custody pursuant to his motion for “shock probation”. This Court was not notified of

Applicant’s release until September 23, 2013.

This Court had jurisdiction to consider the 11.07 habeas application at the time it was filed,

but the order granting shock probation meant the conviction was no longer final. After

reconsideration on our own motion, the Court withdraws its previous opinion and substitutes this

opinion. Applicant’s application is hereby dismissed.

DO NOT PUBLISH

DELIVERED: October 23, 2013
EXHIBIT 32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the Annual Report of CreditRiskMonitor.com, Inc. (“CRMZ”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jerome S. Flum, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
 
 (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 By: /s/ Jerome S. FlumJerome S. FlumChief Executive Officer
 
 March 18, 2011
 
 This certification is being furnished to the SEC with this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to liability of that section.
#### 1352.228-72 Deductibles under required insurance coverage—fixed price.

As prescribed in 48 CFR 1328.310-70(d), insert the following clause:

# Deductibles Under Required Insurance Coverage—Fixed Price (APR 2010)

When the Government is injured, wholly or partially as a result of the contractor's actions and such actions are covered by the insurance required by *1352.228-70, Insurance Coverage,* the Government is entitled to recover from the contractor the full amount of any such injury attributable to the contractor regardless of a deductible. The Contracting Officer may offset the amount of recovery against any payment due to the contractor.

(End of clause)

[75 FR 10570, Mar. 8, 2010; 75 FR 14496, Mar. 26, 2010]