alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §1362. Publication of marketing quota; mailing of allotment notice

All acreage allotments, and the farm marketing quotas established for farms in a county or other local administrative area shall, in accordance with regulations of the Secretary, be made and kept freely available for public inspection in such county or other local administrative area. An additional copy of this information shall be kept available in the office of the county agricultural extension agent or with the chairman of the local committee. Notice of the farm marketing quota of his farm shall be mailed to the farmer.

Notice of the farm acreage allotment established for each farm shown by the records of the county committee to be entitled to such allotment shall insofar as practicable be mailed to the farm operator in sufficient time to be received prior to the date of the referendum.

(Feb. 16, 1938, ch. 30, title III, §362, 52 Stat. 62; Aug. 29, 1949, ch. 518, §2(c), 63 Stat. 676.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1949—Act Aug. 29, 1949, inserted paragraph providing for mailing of notice of allotment.
Exhibit  23.01


                 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of our
reports dated  February 27, 1998 included in this Form 10-K,  into the Company's
previously  filed  Registration  Statements  on Form S-3,  File  Nos.  33-79794,
33-90734,  33-65333,  333-01595,  333-5185,  333-17433 and 333-34705 and on Form
S-8, File nos. 33-89144, 333-15369 and 333-40873.




                                                /s/ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP


Washington, D.C.,
April 20, 1998
#### In the Matter of Steven Herrera, Petitioner, v Ronald Hollie et al., Respondents.

[832 NYS2d 823]

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of prohibition, to prohibit the respondents from proceeding with the retrial of the petitioner, Steven Herrera, who is the defendant in a criminal action entitled *People v Herrera,*pending in the Supreme Court, Queens County, under indictment No. 2867/04.

Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

“Because of its extraordinary nature, prohibition is available only where there is a clear legal right, and then only when a court—in cases where judicial authority is challenged—acts or threatens to act either without jurisdiction or in excess of its authorized powers” *(Matter of Holtzman v Goldman,*71 NY2d 564, 569 [1988]; *see, Matter of Rush v Mordue,*68 NY2d 348, 352 [1986]). The petitioner has failed to demonstrate a clear legal right to the relief sought. Crane, J.P., Florio, Fisher and Dickerson, JJ., concur.
### §5664. Repealed. Pub. L. 104–127, title II, §248, Apr. 4, 1996, 110 Stat. 969

Section, Pub. L. 95–501, title IV, §404, as added Pub. L. 101–624, title XV, §1531, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 3682; amended Pub. L. 102–237, title III, §312, Dec. 13, 1991, 105 Stat. 1856, related to regulations to implement export promotion provisions.
§ 2102.13 Requirements for access to a record. ( a ) Individuals requesting access to a record or system of records in which there is information concerning them must address a request in writing to the Staff Secretary of the NSC (see § 2102.1). Due to restricted access to NSC offices in the Old Executive Office Building where the files are located, requests cannot be made in person.
( b ) All written requests should contain a concise description of the records to which access is requested. In addition, the requestor should include any other information which he or she feels would assist in the timely identification of the record. Verification of the requestor's identity will be determined under the same procedures used in requests for learning of the existence of a record.
( c ) To the extent possible, any request for access will be answered by the Staff Secretary or a designated alternate within ten working days (excluding Saturdays, Sundays, and legal Federal holidays) of the receipt of the request. In the event that a response cannot be made within this time, the requestor will be notified by mail of the reasons for the delay and the date upon which a reply can be expected.
( d ) The NSC response will forward a copy of the requested materials unless further identification or clarification of the request is required. In the event access is denied, the requestor shall be informed of the reasons therefore and the name and address of the individual to whom an appeal should be directed.
### §1627. Appointment of personnel; compensation; employment of specialists

The Secretary of Agriculture shall have the power to appoint, remove, and fix, in accordance with existing law, the compensation of such officers and employees, and to make such expenditures as he deems necessary, including expenditures for rent outside the District of Columbia, travel, supplies, books, equipment, and such other expenditures as may be necessary to the administration of this chapter: Provided, That the Secretary of Agriculture may appoint any technically qualified person, firm, or organization by contract or otherwise on a temporary basis and for a term not to exceed six months in any fiscal year to perform research, inspection, classification, technical, or other special services, without regard to the civil-service laws.

(Aug. 14, 1946, ch. 966, title II, §208, 60 Stat. 1091.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Provisions that authorized the Secretary of Agriculture to "fix the compensation" of any technically qualified person, firm, or organization by contract or otherwise on a temporary basis and for a term not to exceed six months in any fiscal year to perform research, inspection, classification, technical or other special services, without regard to the "Classification Act of 1923, as amended" were omitted as obsolete. Sections 1202 and 1204 of the Classification Act of 1949, 63 Stat. 972, 973 repealed the 1923 Act and all laws or parts of laws inconsistent with the 1949 Act. While section 1106(a) of the 1949 Act provided that references in other laws to the 1923 Act should be held and considered to mean the 1949 Act, it did not have the effect of continuing the exceptions contained in this subsection because of section 1106(b) which provided that the application of the 1949 Act to any position, officer, or employee shall not be affected by section 1106(a). The Classification Act of 1949 was repealed by Pub. L. 89–554, §8(a), Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 632 (of which section 1 revised and enacted Title 5, U.S.C., into law). Section 5102 of Title 5, now contains the applicability provisions of the 1949 Act, and section 5103 of Title 5 authorizes the Office of Personnel Management to determine the applicability to specific positions and employees.
###### Editorial Note on Part 842

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 842 appear at 81 FR 83688, Nov. 22, 2016.

#### § 842.34 Advance payments.

Subpart P of this part sets forth procedures for advance payments.

[81 FR 83690, Nov. 22, 2016]
### §4304. Notice and hearing

Whenever the Secretary has reason to believe that the issuance of an order will tend to effectuate the declared policy of this chapter, the Secretary shall give due notice and opportunity for hearing upon a proposed order. Such hearing may be requested and a proposal for an order submitted by an organization certified pursuant to section 4315 of this chapter, or by any interested person affected by the provisions of this chapter, including the Secretary.

(Pub. L. 97–98, title XVII, §1705, Dec. 22, 1981, 95 Stat. 1350.)
### §228b–4. Violation of final order by live poultry dealer; penalty

Any live poultry dealer, or any officer, director, agent, or employee of a live poultry dealer, who fails to obey any order of the Secretary issued under the provisions of section 228b–2 of this title, or such order as modified—

(1) after the expiration of the time allowed for filing a petition in the court of appeals to set aside or modify such order, if no such petition has been filed within such time;

(2) after the expiration of the time allowed for applying for a writ of certiorari, if such order, or such order as modified, has been sustained by the court of appeals and no such writ has been applied for within such time; or

(3) after such order, or such order as modified, has been sustained by the courts as provided in section 228b–3 of this title;

shall on conviction be fined not less than $1,000 nor more than $20,000. Each day during which such failure continues shall be deemed a separate offense.

(Aug. 15, 1921, ch. 64, title IV, §413, as added Pub. L. 100–173, §9(2), Nov. 23, 1987, 101 Stat. 922.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective 90 days after Nov. 23, 1987, see section 12 of Pub. L. 100–173, set out as an Effective Date of 1987 Amendment note under section 182 of this title.
### §431. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 431 was editorially reclassified as section 626 of Title 21, Food and Drugs.
###### Editorial Note on Part 842

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 842 appear at 81 FR 83688, Nov. 22, 2016.

#### § 842.72 Scope of this subpart.

It sets forth the procedure for administrative settlement of admiralty and maritime claims in favor of and against the United States.

[55 FR 2809, Jan. 29, 1990. Redesignated at 81 FR 83695, Nov. 22, 2016]
Opinion issued September 8, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-16-00578-CR

———————————

IN RE SAMUEL ROY JACKSON, Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator, Samuel Roy Jackson, incarcerated and proceeding pro se, has filed a 

petition for a writ of mandamus, “seeking relief from [a] void court order” rendered 

in the underlying proceeding.

1

 We dismiss the petition for want of jurisdiction.

 

1 The underlying case is The State of Texas v. Samuel Roy Jackson, cause number 

913043, pending in the 183rd District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable 

Vanessa Velasquez presiding.
2

Relator seeks relief from a final felony conviction. See Jackson v. State, No. 

01–04–01137–CR, 2005 WL 3072018, at *4 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] Nov. 

17, 2005, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication) (affirming conviction). 

Because his petition involves a final post-conviction felony proceeding, article 11.07 

of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure governs and provides the exclusive means 

to challenge the conviction. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 11.07 (Vernon

2015); Padieu v. Court of Appeals of Tex., Fifth Dist., 392 S.W.3d 115, 117 (Tex. 

Crim. App. 2013); Bd. of Pardons & Paroles ex rel. Keene v. Court of Appeals for 

Eighth Dist., 910 S.W.2d 481, 482 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995). Only the Texas Court 

of Criminal Appeals has jurisdiction in final post-conviction felony proceedings. 

See In re Briscoe, 230 S.W.3d 196, 196–97 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2006, 

orig. proceeding); In re McAfee, 53 S.W.3d 715, 717–18 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st 

Dist.] 2001, orig. proceeding). “Article 11.07 contains no role for the courts of 

appeals.” In re Briscoe, 230 S.W.3d at 196. Accordingly, we do not have 

jurisdiction over relator’s mandamus petition.

We dismiss the petition for want of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Keyes, and Brown.

Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
### §1736l. Consultation on grain marketing

Congress encourages the Secretary of Agriculture, in coordination with other appropriate Federal departments and agencies, to continue to consult with representatives of other major grain exporting nations toward the goal of establishing more orderly marketing of grain and achieving higher farm income for producers of grain.

(Pub. L. 97–98, title XII, §1206, Dec. 22, 1981, 95 Stat. 1278.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Agriculture and Food Act of 1981, and not as part of the Food for Peace Act which comprises this chapter.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Dec. 22, 1981, see section 1801 of Pub. L. 97–98, set out as a note under section 4301 of this title.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This Schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the
Form 10-KSB of Kent  financial  Services,  Inc. for the year ended  December 31,
1998 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<CIK>                                          0000316028              
<NAME>                                         Kent Financial Services, Inc. 
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                     8,217
<SECURITIES>                               5,064
<RECEIVABLES>                              1,269
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          14,550
<PP&E>                                     1,688
<DEPRECIATION>                               474
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            15,958
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      3,073
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                     199
<OTHER-SE>                                12,323
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              15,958
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           5,183
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           4,368
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           280
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              535
<INCOME-TAX>                                   3
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          532
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                 532
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                .27
<EPS-DILUTED>                                .27
        


</TABLE>
[ DO NOT PUBLISH] 

## In the 

# United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________
No. 24

- 12689

Non

- Argument Calendar

____________________

NICOLAS SAINT SURIN,
Petitioner,

versus U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Respondent.

____________________ Petition for Review of a Decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals Agency No. A200

- 456

- 785

____________________ USCA11 Case: 24-12689 Document: 13-1 Date Filed: 09/24/2024 Page: 1 of 22 Opinion of the Court 24

- 12689

Before R OSENBAUM , B RANCH , and L UCK , Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:Nicholas Saint Surin seeks review of the Board of Immigration Appeal’s (“BIA”) June 26, 2024 order finding that he withdrew his appeal from an Immigration Judge’s decision denying asylumand ordering removal. The government moves to dismiss the petition f or review for lack of jurisdiction. Surin has not filed a response to the motion, but he has filed a motion for stay of removal.

The 30

- day time limit required Surin to file a petition of review of the BIA’s June 26, 2024 order by July 26, 2024. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(1). Surin’s petition for review was not filed until August 12, 2024 at the earliest, which is the date that he signed it. See Fed. R. App. P. 25(a)(2)(A)(iii). Thus, the petition is untimely and cannot invoke this Court’s jurisdiction. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(1); Stone v. INS , 514 U.S. 386, 405 (1995); Chao Lin v. U.S. Att’y Gen.
, 677 F.3d 1043, 1045 (11th Cir. 2012 ). Accordingly, the government’s motion to dismiss is GRANTED and this appeal is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. All other pending motions are DENIED as moot. USCA11 Case: 24-12689 Document: 13-1 Date Filed: 09/24/2024 Page: 2 of 2
#### § 746.10 Reports.

A license shall require the licensee to submit periodic reports on his efforts to achieve practical application of the invention. The reports shall contain information within his knowledge, or which he may acquire under normal business practices, pertaining to the commercial use being made of the invention, and other information which the Chief of Naval Research may determine is pertinent to its licensing activities and is specified in the license.
Editorial Note on Part 724
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 724 appear at 65 FR 62616, Oct. 19, 2000.

§ 724.302 Functions: Director, Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards. ( a ) Make recommendations to the Secretary of the Navy regarding organization, tasking and resources of the NDRB and its associated administrative support.
( b ) Submit recommendations to the Secretary of the Navy regarding policy and procedures for discharge review.
( c ) Provide administrative and clerical support for NDRB.
( d ) Inform the Secretary of the Navy of matters of interest to him.
( e ) Maintain a system of records, including as a minimum: ( 1 ) Records specified for the NDRB as stipulated in the procedures prescribed in subpart H of this Manual.
( 2 ) Records required for the administration of military and civilian personnel.
( 3 ) Files of correspondence received and issued.
( f ) Establish billet/position assignment criteria for the NDRB.
( g ) Propose to the Secretary of the Navy, changes to this instruction.
( h ) Issue requisite precepts and remove or add members to the NDRB from personnel detailed to serve on the Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards, or from personnel otherwise made available.
[50 FR 10943, Mar. 19, 1985, as amended at 75 FR 747, Jan. 6, 2010]
### §2716. Regulations

The Secretary is authorized to make regulations with force and effect of law, as may be necessary to carry out the provisions of this chapter and the powers vested in him by this chapter.

(Pub. L. 93–428, §17, Oct. 1, 1974, 88 Stat. 1178.)
§ 915.20 Approval of Iowa abandoned mine land reclamation plan. The Secretary approved the Iowa abandoned mine land reclamation plan, as submitted on December 17, 1982, effective March 28, 1983. Copies of the approved plan are available at: ( a ) Iowa Department of Agriculture and Land Stewardship, Division of Soil Conservation, Henry A. Wallace Building, E. 9th and Grand Streets, Des Moines, IA 50319.
( b ) Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, Mid-Continent Regional Coordinating Center, Alton Federal Building, 501 Belle Street, Alton, IL 62002.
[64 FR 20167, Apr. 26, 1999]
#### SMITH, Respondent, v. BYRNES, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

January 23, 1903.)

Action by Harry W. Smith against Thomas F. Byrnes.

No opinion. Order modified by reducing the terms imposed from $80 to $30, and as modified affirmed, without costs.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1


                          SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY

Following is a list of the Company's subsidiaries:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                           Organized            Percent of
                                             Under          Voting Securities
Name                                      the Laws of      Owned by Registrant
----                                      -----------      -------------------
<S>                                       <C>              <C>
Intelect Network Technologies Company       Nevada                100%
Intelect Communications Systems Ltd.        Bermuda               100%
Intelect Network Systems Limited            England               100%
Intelect Visual Communications Corp.        Delaware              100%
DNA Enterprises, Inc.                       Texas                 100%
</TABLE>
### §1383a. Written consent for reconcentration of cotton

In the administration of section 1383(b) of this title the written consent of the producer or borrower to the reconcentration of any cotton held as security for any loan heretofore or hereafter made or arranged for by the Commodity Credit Corporation shall not be deemed to have been given unless such consent shall have been given in an instrument made solely for that purpose. Notwithstanding any provision of any loan agreement heretofore made, no cotton held under any such agreement as security for any such loan shall be moved from one warehouse to another unless the written consent of the producer or borrower shall have been obtained in a separate instrument given solely for that purpose, as required by this section. The giving of written consent for the reconcentration of cotton shall not be made a condition upon the making of any loan hereafter made or arranged for by the Commodity Credit Corporation: Provided, however, That in cases where there is congestion and lack of storage facilities, and the local warehouse certifies such fact and requests the Commodity Credit Corporation to move the cotton for reconcentration to some other point, or when the Commodity Credit Corporation determines such loan cotton is improperly warehoused and subject to damage, or if uninsured, or if any of the terms of the loan agreement are violated, or if carrying charges are substantially in excess of the average of carrying charges available elsewhere, and the local warehouse, after notice, declines to reduce such charges, such written consent as provided in this section need not be obtained; and consent to movement under any of the conditions of this proviso may be required in future loan agreements.

(June 16, 1938, ch. 480, 52 Stat. 762.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was not enacted as part of the Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1938 which comprises this chapter.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

Administration of program of Commodity Credit Corporation transferred to Secretary of Agriculture by 1946 Reorg. Plan No. 3, §501, eff. July 16, 1946, 11 F.R. 7877, 60 Stat. 1100, set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.

#### Exceptions From Transfer of Functions

Functions of Corporations of Department of Agriculture, boards of directors and officers of such corporations; Advisory Board of Commodity Credit Corporation; and Farm Credit Administration or any agency, officer, or entity of, under, or subject to supervision of said Administration excepted from functions of officers, agencies, and employees transferred to Secretary of Agriculture by 1953 Reorg. Plan No. 2, §1, effective June 4, 1953, 18 F.R. 3219, 67 Stat. 633, set out as a note under section 2201 of this title.
#### Jane Thiele, Respondent, v. Robert Thiele, Appellant.

Order entered on April 23, 1962 unanimously affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Concur — Rabin, J. P., Valente, Stevens, Eager and Steuer, JJ.
**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

 

       We consent to the reference to our firm under the heading "Experts" in the Registration Statement (Form F-3) dated July 16, 2007 and the related prospectus of EDAP TMS S.A. (the “Company”) for the registration of 200,000 ordinary shares of the Company's common stock and to the incorporation by reference therein of our report dated March 30, 2007, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of the Company and its subsidiaries included in the Company's Annual Report (Form 20-F) for the year ended December 31, 2006, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

 

 

ERNST & YOUNG Audit

/s/ LAURENT CHAPOULAUD         

Represented by   Laurent Chapoulaud

 

Lyon, France  July 16, 2007