alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Press release



For Immediate Release



Arcelor Mittal Press Release on Dofasco



November 13, 2006Luxembourg / London- Arcelor Mittal* has been informed that the directors of the Strategic Steel Stichting, the Dutch foundation that holds the shares of Dofasco Inc., decided on November 10 not to dissolve the foundation, which would have permitted the sale of Dofasco.  The boards of both Mittal Steel Company NV and Arcelor SA had previously requested the directors of the foundation to dissolve the foundation in order to allow the sale of Dofasco.  Arcelor Mittal is reviewing the situation and will be in contact with the US Department of Justice.



*  Mittal Steel Company NV and Arcelor SA



About Arcelor Mittal



Arcelor Mittal is the worlds number one steel company, with 320,000 employees in more than 60 countries.  The company, which will be incorporated in 2007 following the successful tender offer, brings together the worlds number one and number two steel companies, Arcelor and Mittal Steel.



Arcelor Mittal is the leader in all major global markets, including automotive, construction, household appliances and packaging, with leading R&D and technology, as well as sizeable captive supplies of raw materials and outstanding distribution networks. An industrial presence in 27 European, Asian, African and American countries exposes the company to all the key steel markets, from emerging to mature, positions it will be looking to develop in the high-growth Chinese and Indian markets.



Arcelor Mittal key pro forma financials for the first six months of 2006 show combined revenues of 43,281 billion, with approximate production capacity of 130 million tonnes a year, representing around 10 per cent of world steel output. The company respects the highest standards in corporate social responsibility and intends to periodically publish significant sustainable development key performance indicators to live up to this ambition.





---







Contact at Arcelor Mittals Investor Relations

|Continental Europe |  | +352 4792 2414  
|------------------ |  | ----------------
|UK/Asia/Africa     |  | +44 207 543 1172
|Americas           |  | +1 312 899 3569 
|Retail             |  | +352 4792 2434  
|SRI                |  | +352 4792 2902  

|Nicola Davidson |  | +44 207 543 1162 / 1172
|--------------- |  | -----------------------
|Luc Scheer      |  | +352 4792 2360         
|               
|UK media:       |  | Maitland Consultancy   
|Philip Gawith   |  | +44 20 7379 5151       
|Lydia Pretzlik  |  | +44 20 7379 5151
Exhibit 32


                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


Pursuant  to  section  906  of  the Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002
(subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18,
United  States Code), each of the undersigned officers of  Ennis,
Inc.  (the  "Company"), does hereby certify,  to  such  officer's
knowledge, that:

The  Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended November
30,  2004 (the Form 10-Q) of the Company fully complies with  the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly
presents,  in all material respects, the financial condition  and
results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Keith S. Walters

Keith S. Walters
Chief Executive Officer
January 7, 2005





/s/ Harve Cathey

Harve Cathey
Chief Financial Officer
January 7, 2005




The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsection (a) and
(b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code)
and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate
disclosure document.


<PAGE>
### §1441a. Cost of production study and establishment of current national weighted average cost of production

The Secretary of Agriculture, in cooperation with the land grant colleges, commodity organizations, general farm organizations, and individual farmers, shall conduct a cost of production study of the wheat, feed grain, cotton, and dairy commodities under the various production practices and establish a current national weighted average cost of production. This study shall be updated annually and shall include all typical variable costs, including interest costs, a return on fixed costs, and a return for management.

(Pub. L. 91–524, title VIII, §808, as added Pub. L. 93–86, §1(27)(B), Aug. 10, 1973, 87 Stat. 237; amended Pub. L. 97–98, title XI, §1117, Dec. 22, 1981, 95 Stat. 1271.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Agricultural Act of 1970 as added by the Agriculture and Consumer Protection Act of 1973, and not as part of the Agricultural Act of 1949 which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of the 1949 Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1421 of this title and Tables.

#### Amendments

1981—Pub. L. 97–98 inserted "including interest costs," after "variable costs,", substituted ", and a return for management" for "equal to the existing interest rates charged by the Federal Land Bank, and return for management comparable to the normal management fees charged by other comparable industries", and struck out provision that these studies be based upon the size unit that requires one man to farm on a full-time basis.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1981 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 97–98 effective Dec. 22, 1981, see section 1801 of Pub. L. 97–98, set out as an Effective Date note under section 4301 of this title.
#### § 1699.111 Notice.

The agency shall make available to employees, applicants, participants, beneficiaries, and other interested persons such information regarding the provisions of this part and its applicability to the programs or activities conducted by the agency, and make such information available to them in such manner as the agency head finds necessary to apprise such persons of the protections against discrimination assured them by section 504 and its regulation.
#### In the Matter of Innes & Gaenzler et al., Respondents, v. Village Assessor of the Incorporated Village of Hempstead et al., Appellants. (Proceeding No. 1.) Irving Pinsker et al., Respondents, v. William O. Gulde, as Mayor of the Incorporated Village of Hempstead, et al., Appellants. (Proceeding No. 2.) Franklin Shops, Inc., et al., Respondents, v. Village Assessor of the Incorporated Village of Hempstead et al., Appellants. (Proceeding No. 3.)

—In consolidated tax certiorari proceedings relating to property in the Incorporated Village of Hempstead, the village officials appeal from a final order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered June 8, 1961 upon the court’s decision (as amended) after a non jury trial, which *inter alla*(a) reduced certain assessments and (b) provided for a refund to the petitioners of the resulting tax overpayments, with interest at 6% per annum. Order modified on the law so as to provide that the interest on the refunds directed by the fourth decretal paragraph to be made to the petitioners shall be computed at the rate of 4% per annum to July 1, 1956, and at 3% thereafter. As so modified, the order is affirmed, with costs to the petitioners. The findings of fact are affirmed. Prior to July 1, 1956, section 3-a of the General Municipal Law provided for a maximum interest rate of 4% per annum on all accrued claims and judgments against municipal corporations. Effective July 1, 1956, that statute was amended so as to reduce such rate to 3%. The statute applies to tax refunds pursuant to a final order in a tax certiorari proceeding *(People ex rel. Emigrant Ind. Sav. Bank*v. *Sexton,*259 App. Div. 566, affd. 284, N. Y. 57). Ughetta, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Brennan and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



### February 27, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice


### 129627 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan 

### MONIQUE RIVERS, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices



### v SC: 129627 COA: 261547 Wayne CC: 02-251317-DS BEVERLY MOORE, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal th e July 14, 2005 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

p0221 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

February 27, 2006

Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated balance sheets and consolidated condensed statements of
income and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          27,551
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  406,620
<ALLOWANCES>                                    20,971
<INVENTORY>                                    401,029
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               942,500
<PP&E>                                         878,236
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0<F1>
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,600,046
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          739,033
<BONDS>                                        626,983
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       120,379
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,716,786
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,600,046
<SALES>                                        178,789
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               395,382
<CGS>                                          126,193
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  280,992
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,022
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 16,238
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,682
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              9,993
<DISCONTINUED>                                 (3,458)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,535
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.06


</TABLE>
§ 855.15 Detaining an aircraft. ( a ) An installation commander in the United States, its territories, or its possessions may choose to detain an aircraft for an intentional unauthorized landing until: ( 1 ) The unauthorized landing has been reported to the FAA, HQ USAF/XOOBC, and the appropriate US Attorney.
( 2 ) All applicable charges have been paid.
( b ) If the installation commander wishes to release the aircraft before the investigation is completed, he or she must obtain bond, promissory note, or other security for payment of the highest charge that may be assessed.
( c ) The pilot and passengers will not be detained longer than is necessary for identification, although they may be permitted to remain in a lounge or other waiting area on the base at their request for such period as the installation commander may determine (normally not to exceed close of business hours at the home office of the entity owning the aircraft, if the operator does not own the aircraft). No person, solely due to an intentional unauthorized landing, will be detained involuntarily after identification is complete without coordination from the appropriate US Attorney, the MAJCOM, FOA, or DRU, and HQ USAF/XOOBC.
#### § 21.610 Agreements officer.

An official with the authority to enter into, administer, and/or terminate technology investment agreements.
### §3292a. United States-Mexico joint agricultural research

#### (a) Research and development program

The Secretary may provide for an agricultural research and development program with the George E. Brown United States/Mexico Foundation for Science. The program shall focus on binational problems facing agricultural producers and consumers in the 2 countries, in particular pressing problems in the areas of food safety, plant and animal pest control, and the natural resources base on which agriculture depends.

#### (b) Administration

Grants under the research and development program shall be awarded competitively through the Foundation.

#### (c) Matching requirements

The provision of funds to the Foundation by the United States Government shall be subject to the condition that the Government of Mexico match, on at least a dollar-for-dollar basis, any funds provided by the United States Government.

#### (d) Limitation on use of funds

Funds provided under this section may not be used for the planning, repair, rehabilitation, acquisition, or construction of a building or facility.

(Pub. L. 95–113, title XIV, §1459, as added Pub. L. 105–185, title II, §228, June 23, 1998, 112 Stat. 545; amended Pub. L. 106–74, title IV, §423, Oct. 20, 1999, 113 Stat. 1095.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 1459 of Pub. L. 95–113 was classified to section 3301 of this title, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 99–198.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

"George E. Brown United States/Mexico Foundation for Science" substituted in subsec. (a) for "United States/Mexico Foundation for Science" pursuant to section 423 of Pub. L. 106–74, set out below.

Pub. L. 106–74, title IV, §423, Oct. 20, 1999, 113 Stat. 1095, provided in part: "That the United States/Mexico Foundation for Science is renamed the 'George E. Brown United States/Mexico Foundation for Science'."
#### Salvatore Esposito, Doing Business as Canal Lumber Co., Respondent, v. John Del Gais et al., Defendants, and Joe Greenberg, Appellant.

In an action to recover the agreed and reasonable value of goods sold and delivered, and to recover upon a written guarantee of payment for such goods, the defendant Greenberg, the alleged guarantor, appeals: (1) from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, dated April 6, 1959, as grants the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment striking out said defendant’s answer, pursuant to rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice; and (2) from so mu'eh of a judgment of said court, dated April 8, 1959, entered upon said order, as is against said defendant. Order and judgment insofar as appealed from reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion denied. The record presents triable issues of fact. Beldock, Acting P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur.
### §427d. Repealed. Aug. 11, 1955, ch. 790, §2, 69 Stat. 674

Section, acts June 29, 1935, ch. 338, title I, §5, 49 Stat. 437; Sept. 21, 1944, ch. 412, title I, §105, 58 Stat. 735, related to allocation of appropriations. See section 361c of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Existing Rights and Liabilities

Any rights or liabilities existing under this section unaffected by repeal, see section 2 of act Aug. 11, 1955, set out as a note under former section 361 of this title.
EXHIBIT 32.2


Certification of the Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with this quarterly report of Espey Mfg. & Electronics Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “report”), I, David O’Neil, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





1.
The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: November 12, 2010








/s/David O’NeilDavid O’NeilTreasurer and Principal Financial Officer








17
### §364. Repealed. Aug. 11, 1955, ch. 790, §2, 69 Stat. 675

Section, act Mar. 2, 1889, ch. 373, 25 Stat. 840, required all agricultural experiment stations to devote a portion of their work to the examination and classification of the soils of their respective States and Territories.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Existing Rights and Liabilities

Any rights or liabilities existing under this section as unaffected by repeal, see section 2 of act Aug. 11, 1955, set out as a note under former section 361 of this title.
#### PRIDGEN v. HUGHES

No. 427P97

Case below: 127 N.C.App.-(19 August 1997)

Petition by plaintiffs for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 2 October 1997.
§ 552.129 Requirements for carrying and use. Persons legally authorized to possess firearms, ammunition, knives (with blades longer than 3 inches), bows and arrows, and crossbows, may carry or transport legally possessed and registered (if required) weapons under the following conditions: ( a ) For purposes of hunting: From quarters, on or off the installation, by the most direct route to hunting area and return. Stopping at other installation facilities while en route is prohibited (*i.e.*, post exchange, club, offices, etc.). Individual must have in his/her possession weapon registration (if applicable), valid state hunting license, valid Fort Gordon hunting permit and an area access pass (if applicable).
( b ) For purposes of target shooting, selling the weapon or having the weapon repaired: From quarters by the most direct route to approved range or to the location where the weapon is to be sold or repaired and returned. Stopping at other installation facilities while en route is prohibited. Individual must have in his/her possession at all times his/her registration (if applicable). ( 1 ) When carried, weapons will be carried in an open manner (not concealed). Firearms will be unloaded when carried (*i.e.*, projectiles physically separated from the firearms, not just removed from the chamber), except when actually engaged in hunting or shooting. Knives will be carried in a sheath or scabbard worn in a clearly visible manner. Commanders may authorize the carrying of a privately-owned, knife with a blade over 3 inches to field duty. The provost marshal may authorize the carrying of a privately-owned, sheathed, lock blade knife on military and DOD police officers' pistol belts.
( 2 ) When transported in a vehicle, weapons will be in plain view in the passenger area of the vehicle or secured (locked) in the trunk or other rear compartment of the vehicle, not readily accessible from the passenger area (*i.e.*, locked tool box secured to bed of a truck). Firearms will be unloaded and the ammunition physically separated from the firearms. THE GLOVE COMPARTMENT OF A VEHICLE IS NOT AN AUTHORIZED COMPARTMENT FOR STORING PISTOLS.
( 3 ) Firearms, bows and arrows, crossbows, pellet and BB guns will not be loaded, fired, or used within any housing area or cantonment area of the installation; within 50 yards of any public highway, street or Fort Gordon named street or numbered road, or across same; within 100 yards of any designated recreation area, managed waters, building or similar structures; any aircraft landing facility; any ammunition storage area (except on approved firing ranges when properly authorized); be discharged from vehicles.
C. A. No. 73-33.

#### State *v.*Leo Desroches.

*Julius C. Michael-son,*Attorney General, *Judith Romney Wegner,*Special Asst. Attorney General, for plaintiff.

*Leo Desroches,*pro se, for defendant.

The motion to

remand this case to Superior Court is denied.
### §1512. Corporation as fiscal agent of Government

When designated for that purpose by the Secretary of the Treasury, the Corporation shall be a depository of public money, except receipts from customs, under such regulations as may be prescribed by said Secretary; and it may also be employed as a financial agent of the Government; and it shall perform all such reasonable duties, as a depository of public money and financial agent of the Government, as may be required of it.

(Feb. 16, 1938, ch. 30, title V, §512, 52 Stat. 75.)

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

Administration of program of Federal Crop Insurance Corporation transferred to Secretary of Agriculture by 1946 Reorg. Plan No. 3, §501, eff. July 16, 1946, 11 F.R. 7877, 60 Stat. 1100. See note set out under section 1503 of this title.

Wartime consolidation of Federal Crop Insurance Corporation into Agricultural Conservation and Adjustment Administration, see note set out under section 1503 of this title.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Esterline Technologies Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 27, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-Q), I, Robert D. George,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)    The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)    The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.





|                        |  |     |  |                                                          
|----------------------- |  | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------
|Dated:  August 31, 2007 |  | By: |  | /s/ Robert D. George                                     
|                        |  |     |  | Robert D. George Vice President, Chief Financial Officer,
|                        |  |     |  | Secretary and Treasurer
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Annual Report of Matrix Energy Services Corp.,
on Form 10-KSB for the period ending September 30, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, James Anderson, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a)
or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.



Date: January 10, 2007     /s/James Anderson
                             James Anderson
                             Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting
                             Officer