alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2



               Certification of Periodic Financial Report by
         Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



I, George R. Kirkland, Senior Vice-President and Treasurer of Southwest
Georgia Financial Corporation certify that:

  (1)  The Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the annual period
       ended December 31, 2009 (the "Report") fully complies with the
       requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
       Act of 1934; and

  (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly present, in all material
       respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
       Corporation.



                                 By:   /s/George R. Kirkland
                                       George R. Kirkland
                                       Senior Vice-President and Treasurer
                                       (Chief Financial Officer)
                                       Southwest Georgia Financial Corporation
March 31, 2010
CAREER READINESS FOR ALL

“An economy built to last demands that we keep doing everything we can to help students learn the 

skills that businesses are looking for.” 

- President Obama

President Obama has set the ambitious goal that all adult Americans commit to at least one year of 

higher education or career training and that America once again lead the world in college graduates 

by 2020. Reaching this goal is crucial if we are to maintain our economic competitiveness. Our 

economic competitors often outrank the United States in the rigor and relevance of the education 

provided to young people in their middle and high school years, with many nations offering the 

opportunity to enroll in educational programs that develop skills essential for college and career 

success. Meanwhile, the need for investing in programs that train students and adults for in-demand 

jobs in our technology-driven economy will address a persistent skills gap in the employment market 

and help increase the employment rate. 

The President’s 2014 budget request maintains a strong commitment to initiatives that link 

education to the career training and skills development needed for the United States to out-innovate 

and out-compete the rest of the world. 

• Reauthorized Perkins Career and Technical Education (CTE) program ($1.1 billion). 

The President’s budget would fund a reauthorized Carl D. Perkins Career and Technical 

Education Act. The reauthorization proposal would strengthen alignment among secondary and 

postsecondary CTE programs and business and industry; create a better accountability system 

for improving academic outcomes, technical skills, and employability outcomes; and provide 

competitive funding to promote innovation and reform in CTE.

• High School Redesign ($300 million). The budget request supports a new competition that 

would fund district partnerships with (i) postsecondary institutions and (ii) business, industry, 

non-profits, or community based organizations to redesign high schools. Redesigned high 

schools would ensure that students graduate from high school with college credit and careerrelated experience, putting them on a path to career and college success. Special consideration 

would be given to partnerships that focus on areas with limited access to quality career and 

college opportunities, such as high poverty and rural districts, as well as to partnerships with 

employers that can provide students with career-related experience or career-related credentials.

• Dual Enrollment Program ($42 million). This program would provide grants to establish or 

expand dual-enrollment programs for students in high school or adult education programs. The 

initiative would promote dual-enrollment programs that are aligned with career pathways and 

target local workforce needs. Research has shown that participation in dual-enrollment 

programs is linked to increased high school graduation, higher rates of college enrollment and 

persistence, and higher college credit accrual rates.
### §2266a. Century Farms program

The Secretary shall establish a program under which the Secretary recognizes any farm that—

(1) a State department of agriculture or similar statewide agricultural organization recognizes as a Century Farm; or

(2)(A) is defined as a farm or ranch under section 4284.902 of title 7, Code of Federal Regulations (as in effect on December 20, 2018);

(B) has been in continuous operation for at least 100 years; and

(C) has been owned by the same family for at least 100 consecutive years, as verified through deeds, wills, abstracts, tax statements, or other similar legal documents considered appropriate by the Secretary.

(Pub. L. 115–334, title XII, §12508, Dec. 20, 2018, 132 Stat. 4990.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Definition of "Secretary"

"Secretary" means the Secretary of Agriculture, see section 2 of Pub. L. 115–334, set out as a note under section 9001 of this title.
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 610 

To promote transparency by permitting the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board to allow its disciplinary proceedings to be open to the 

public, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 13, 2017 

Mr. REED (for himself and Mr. GRASSLEY) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs 

A BILL 

To promote transparency by permitting the Public Company 

Accounting Oversight Board to allow its disciplinary proceedings to be open to the public, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘PCAOB Enforcement 

5 Transparency Act of 2017’’. 

6 SEC. 2. OPEN MEETINGS AUTHORIZED. 

7 Section 105(c)(2) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 

8 (15 U.S.C. 7215(c)(2)) is amended to read as follows: 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 610 IS

1 ‘‘(2) PUBLIC HEARINGS.—Hearings under this 

2 section shall be open to the public, unless the Board, 

3 on its own motion or after considering the motion of 

4 a party, orders otherwise.’’. 

5 SEC. 3. PUBLICATION OF DETERMINATIONS. 

6 Section 105(d)(1)(C) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 

7 2002 (15 U.S.C. 7215(d)(1)(C)) is amended by striking 

8 ‘‘(once any stay on the imposition of such sanction has 

9 been lifted)’’. 

Æ 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AUGUST 28, 2015

NO. 03-15-00456-CR

Codus Clifton O’Neill, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 22ND DISTRICT COURT OF HAYS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, GOODWIN, AND BOURLAND

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION-- OPINION BY JUSTICE BOURLAND

This is an appeal from the order signed by the trial court. Having reviewed the record, it appears 

that the Court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal. Therefore, the Court dismisses the appeal for 

want of jurisdiction. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of 

costs is made.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

OFFICE OF FINANCE AND OPERATIONS 

MEMORANDUM 

TO: Departmental Delegations Control Officer

Human Capital Strategic Initiatives Division

Office of Human Resources

THROUGH: Deputy Assistant Secretary, Office of Human Resources 

(Chief Human Capital Officer) 

Director, Human Capital Strategic Initiatives Division, 

Office of Human Resources 

FROM: Assistant Secretary, Office of Finance and Operations

SUBJECT: Delegation of Authority

I. DELEGATION

Under the authority vested in me by a delegation from the Secretary, delegation control 

number EA/EK/203, certified on July 22, 2019, and subject to the reservations noted 

below, I hereby delegate to you, to your successor in function, and to anyone serving for 

you in an acting capacity or delegated to perform the functions and duties of your 

position, the authority to certify all delegations and redelegations of authority. 

II. RESERVATIONS

None. 

III. REDELEGATION

No further redelegation of this authority is authorized. 

IV. CERTIFICATION AND EFFECTIVE DATE

This delegation is effective upon certification of the Department's Delegations Control 

Officer and supersedes EM/EMH/403. I hereby ratify actions within the scope of this 

delegation taken by you prior to certification of this delegation.

 /s 

Denise Carter

OGC Concurrence: Michael Taylor, 11/19/2019 

Certified Date: 12/11/2019 

Departmental Delegations Control Officer: Jim Clemmens

Control Number: EK/EKHS/212
400 MARYLAND AVE. S.W., WASHINGTON, DC 20202-4500

www.ed.gov

The Department of Education’s mission is to promote student achievement and preparation for global competitiveness by 

fostering educational excellence and ensuring equal access.
#### § 845.11 Correspondence.

Judge advocates who advise officers responsible under § 845.3 are authorized to correspond directly with each other and with the Judge Advocate General of the service concerned for advice with regard to payment of counsel fees and other expenses.
§ 746.4 Definitions. ( a ) *Government invention* means an invention covered by a domestic patent or patent application that is vested in the United States and in the custody of the Department of the Navy, and is designated by the Chief of Naval Research as appropriate for the grant of an express non-exclusive or exclusive license.
( b ) *To the point of practical application* means to manufacture in the case of a composition or product, to practice in the case of a process, or to operate in the case of a machine, under such conditions as to establish that the invention is being worked and that its benefits are reasonably accessible to the public.
1001.304 Agency control and compliance procedures. ( a ) The DTAR is under the direct oversight and control of Treasury's Office of the Procurement Executive (OPE), which is responsible for the evaluation, review, and issuance of all Department-wide acquisition regulations and guidance.
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 Form 6-K
 REPORT OF FOREIGN PRIVATE ISSUER
    PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-16 OR 15d-16
    OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 For the month of March  2007 **Commission File Number: 001-16829**
 Bayer Aktiengesellschaft
 Bayer Corporation*
  
  þ o
 N/A
 N/A
  o þ
 N/A
 *
        
        Bayer Corporation is also the name of a wholly-owned subsidiary of the registrant in the United States.








---





|Bayer Logo**News Release** | Bayer AG
      Communications
      51368 Leverkusen
      Germany
      Phone +49 214 30 1
      www.news.bayer.com
|-------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



---





Bayer files 2006 annual report on Form 20-F

with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission



Leverkusen Bayer announced today that it has filed its 2006 annual report on Form 20-F with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and has posted this document on its website at http://www.investor.bayer.com/en/berichte/form-20-f/.  Bayers security holders (including holders of Bayers American Depositary Receipts) may receive a hard copy of this document, which contains Bayers complete audited financial statements, free of charge, upon request. For a copy of this report, requests should be directed to



Bayer AG

c/o Finger Marketing Services GmbH

Postfach 100538

41405 Neuss

Germany

Email: serviceline@bayer-ag.de





| | Leverkusen, | March 15, 2007
| | ----------- | --------------
| | ha          | (2007-0144-E) 



Media Contact:

Christian Hartel, phone +49 214 30 47686

Email: christian.hartel.ch@bayer-ag.de



Forward-looking statements

This news release contains forward-looking statements based on current assumptions and forecasts made by Bayer Group management. Various known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors could lead to material differences between the actual future results, financial situation, development or performance of the company and the estimates given here. These factors include those discussed in our annual and interim reports to the Frankfurt Stock Exchange and in our reports filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (including our Form 20-F). The company assumes no liability whatsoever to update these forward-looking statements or to conform them to future events or developments.







---



SIGNATURE



Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.





BAYER AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT(Registrant)By:
      /s/ DR. ROLAND HARTWIGName:
      Dr. Roland HartwigTitle:
      General CounselBy:
      /s/ DR. ALEXANDER ROSARName:
      Dr. Alexander RosarTitle:
      Head of Investor Relations










Date: March 15, 2007
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Charles Junior Metcalf, Appellant.

Order unanimously reversed and matter remitted to Allegany County Court for a hearing in accordance with the memorandum. Memorandum: Petitioner claims that upon arraignment the County Court Judge should have appointed counsel to defend him. He admits that he was advised as to his right to counsel and that he waived counsel and entered a plea of guilty, but he contends that he was not asked if he desired to have the court appoint counsel to represent him. Further, he contends that during an interview with the District Attorney this defendant was asked if he had money enough to engage the services of an attorney, to which he replied that he had not. He alleges that the District Attorney then said “ Well, it looks like you may have to defend yourself ”. Because of his lack of knowledge of court proceedings, he says, he therefore pleaded guilty to the crime of grand larceny, first degree. He also contends that the District Attorny stated to him that if he should plead guilty he would see that the defendant would serve but a short sentence. There are other contentions in this petition which may not properly be raised in *coram nobis.*Upon the hearing only those contentions that are outlined herein should be considered by the court. At the hearing he should be assigned counsel if he so desires. (Appeal from order of Allegany County Court denying, without a hearing, motion to vacate a judgment of conviction for burglary, third degree, and grand larceny, first degree, rendered July 28, 1950.) Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Henry, Noonan and Del Vecehio, JJ.
#### § 770.16 Definition.

For the purpose of this subpart, SUBASE Bangor shall include that area of land in Kitsap and Jefferson Counties, State of Washington which has been set aside for use of the Federal Government by an Act of the legislature of the State of Washington, approved March 15, 1939 (Session laws of 1939, chapter 126).
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limit ed circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-10109 (Summary Calendar)

LEON HARPER,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

GARY L. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY,

Respondent-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 3:96-CV-1940-X

January 20, 1998 Before JONES, SMITH, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Leo n Harper, Texas prisoner #640518, appeals from the district court’s dismissal without

prejudice of his habeas petition for failure to exhaust his state remedies as to three grounds. Harperargues that the district court erred in dismissing his complaint under the exhaustion doctrine.

Respondent concedes that Harper has exhausted his state court remedies and that the district

court’s judgment should be reversed and the case remanded to the district court for further

proceedings. A review of the state-court records confirms the parties’ position. Harper exhausted

state remedies on t he first three issues raised in his federal habeas petition by presenting them on

direct appeal to the court of appeals and on petition for discretionary review to the Texas Court of

Criminal Appeals. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is REVERSED and this case is

REMANDED to the district court for further proceedings.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.
MEMORANDUM

TO: Assistant Inspector General for Audit

Assistant Inspector General for Evaluation, Inspection

and Management Services

Assistant Inspector General for Investigation

Assistant Inspector General for Information Technology Audit

and Computer Crime Investigations

Counsel to the Inspector General

FROM: Inspector General

SUBJECT: Redelegation of Authority to Request Disclosure of Records Maintained by 

Another Federal Agency

I. DELEGATION

Under the authority vested in me by a delegation from the Secretary, EA/EF/78, 

certified July 22, 1994, I hereby delegate to you and to anyone serving for you in 

an acting capacity, the authority to make written requests for the Office of 

Inspector General (OIG) to another agency or to any instrumentality of the U.S. 

Government for records for a legally authorized OIG civil or criminal law 

enforcement activity, pursuant to the Privacy Act of 1974, as amended, 5 U. S.C. 

§552a(b)(7).

Unless otherwise noted in future delegations of authority, future legislative 

amendments to the authority delegated herein are included within the scope of this 

delegation.

II. RESERVATIONS:

 None.

III. REDELEGATION

Upon the written approval of the Inspector General, you may redelegate this 

authority to Deputy Assistant Inspectors General in Headquarters, Regional 

Inspectors General for Audit, and Special Agents in Charge in the field (formerly 

Regional Inspectors General for Investigation).

Page 2 – Redelegation of Authority

IV. CERTIFICATION AND EFFECTIVE DATE

This delegation is effective upon certification by the Department’s Principal 

Delegations Control Officer and supersedes delegations EF/EFI/79 and 

EF/EFA/80.

I hereby ratify actions within the scope of this delegation taken by the addressees 

prior to the date of certification.

 _________/s/__________ 

John P. Higgins, Jr.

OGC Clearance and Date: /s/ David Berthiaume, 7/13/2004

Certified Date: 7/23/2004

Departmental Delegations Control Officer: /s/ Naty G. Beetle

Control Number: EF/EFB/152
Proposa l Unde rTh e Smal l Communit yAi rServic e Developmen t Progra m rfi44- 

## ANSPOfT i •;;£ TOPE f

••' i Smm r ,y^" ^ 

### •JIO GC T ! 3 A'^

J I 2 %ea ^ %MS W ^J?»ft ' CENTtltSIAT I Augus t 27 , 201 0 Th e Honorabl e RayLaHoo d Secretar y Unite d State s Departmen t o f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne wJerse yAvenue , S E Washington , D C 2059 0 Re : Gran t Applicatio n o f Syracus e Hancoc k Intematicna l Airport Unde r th e USDOT Smal l Communi b Ai rSeivic e Developmen t Proona m Dea rSecretar

yLaHood : Th e CenterSlat e Corporatio n fo rEconomi cOpportunit y(CEO) , representin g th e Syracus e region' s privat e secto rbusines s leadershi p i s please d t o co-sponso rthi s applicatio n wit h th e Cityo f Syracus e (City) for a gran t o f federa l fund s unde rth e Unite d State s O^iartmen t o f Transportation' s Smal l Commumt

yAi rServic e Developmen t Program . W e respectf u l yreques t you rapprova l o f a gran t i n th s amoun t o f $1,000,000
. Thes e fund s woul d b e combine d witt i $300,00 0 contribute d tj yCenterStat e CE O an d ou rmor e tha n 2,30 0 membe rbusinesses . Th e busines s communit yrecognize s tha t convenient , competitivel y price d ai rservic e i s a critica l piiont yfo rth e continue d econorri c developmen t o f Syracus e an d th e CenterStat e Ne wYod i region . CenterStat e CE O i s p'ou d t o b e a partne rwit h th e Cityi n thi s effort . A s w e note d durin g you rrecen t visi t t o Syracuse , w e ar

e confiden t that , wit h you rsupport , ou reffort s t o attrac t ne wlowcostflight s wi l b e successful . Oir rregion' s busires s leadershi p ha s a prove n trac k recor d o l supportin g effort s t o attract ne w servic e wrtt) privat e secto rfunding . I n a n earlie rprogram , w e wer e abl e t o succerafutl yutiliz e privat e funding , in-kin d service s fro m partner s throughou t th e region , an d incentive s fro m th e Cityt o leverag e maxknu m valu e i n conjunctio n wit h a previou s DO T grant , i n 2004 . Thi s resulte d i n increase d passenge rtrafti can d servic e enhancement s a t Syracus e Hancoc k Internationa l Airport , particularl yfo rleisur e travel . Whil e som e o f thes e gain s wer e los t du e t o th e recessk m an d a shar p increas e i n fue l price s i n 2008 , w e believ e ou rne weffor t wil l produc e ver

ypositiv e results . Ou r regiona l econom yi s o n th e rise , note d b yth e Brooking s Institutio n a s on e o f th e stronges t i n Hi e nation , an d ou rbusines s communityi s w ^ positione d t o sustai n new , kw-cos t flight s a t Syracus e Hancoc k Intematnna l Airpcrt . Than k yo u fo ryou rtim e arK

) thoughthJ l coisideratto n o f thi s application . I f yo u have an yquestion s at>out CenterStat e CE O o rou rrol e i n this^ort , pleas e d o no t hesitat e t o contact m e o rKevi n Schwab , vic e preskien t o f ai rservic e development , directl ya t (315 ) 422-8284 . Sincerely , »^ r y0^S>
- »y*/» ^ Rober t M . Simpso n Presiden t & CE O 57 2 S(HJTHSALIN ASTREE T | SYRACUSE , N Y 1320 2 j 315.1^22.818 ^ | WVVW.CENTER5TATECEO.CO M LEADIN G BUSINES S AN D ECONDMi C OEVEt-OPMEN T I N CENTERSTAT E NEWYOR K
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Robert Clayton, Appellant.

Motion by appellant to vacate order dated February 5, 1962, dismissing his appeal, granted; order vacated. Appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged to the November Term, beginning October 22, 1962; appeal ordered on the calendar for said term. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
§ 635.13 Accounting for military police record disclosure. ( a ) 32 CFR part 505 prescribes accounting policies and procedures concerning the disclosure of military police records.
( b ) PM/DES will develop local procedures to ensure that disclosure of military police records as described in 32 CFR part 505 are available on request.
( c ) In every instance where records are disclosed; individuals, agencies or components are reminded that use or further disclosure of any military police reports, Military Police Investigator (MPI) reports, or other information received must be in compliance with DoDI 5505.7 (available at *http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/corres/pdf/550507p.pdf*), paragraph 6.5.2. which states that “judicial or adverse administrative actions shall not be taken against individuals or entities based solely on the fact that they have been titled or indexed due to a criminal investigation.”