alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 12 (b)

**BNP U.S. FUNDING L.L.C.**

**COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES**

**AND PREFERRED SECURITIES DIVIDENDS**

(in thousands, except ratios)

|                                                                 | **For the Year Ended        December 31, 2005**                                           |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Net income                                                           | $ 47,494                                          |
| Fixed charges:                                                       |                                                                                      |
| Audit fees                                                           | 51                                                |
| Trustee fees                                                         | 119                                               |
| Administrative and consulting fees                                   |     1,195                     |
| Total fixed charges                                                  |   1,365                                 |
| Earnings before fixed charges                                        | $ 48,859                                          |
| Fixed charges, as above                                              |       1,365         |
| Preferred securities dividend                                        |    38,690                          |
| Fixed charges including preferred securities dividends               | $ 40,055                                          |
| Ratio of earnings to fixed charges and preferred securities dividend |     1.22                      |
|                                                                 |                                                                                      |
exv4w1



 






EXHIBIT 4.1




CERTIFICATE OF MEMBERSHIP UNITS






Number
 











Membership

Units

 





















	 	 	 
	Agassiz Energy, LLC
	A Limited Liability Company Organized Under the Laws of the State of Minnesota







THIS CERTIFIES THAT                                                                                is/are the owner(s)
of                                                            UNITS (                                        ) of the
Membership Units of Agassiz Energy, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company. Changes in the
actual Membership Units held by the Members are reflected in the Member Control Agreement as
amended of the Company.



The Membership Units represented by this Certificate may not be transferred or assigned except in
compliance with the Member Control Agreement of the Company, a copy of which is available at the
principal office of the Company.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Certificate to be signed by its duly authorized
Chairman and Secretary as of this                     day of                                         , 2006.




	 	 	 
	 
	 	 
	Donald Sargeant, Chairman
	 	Roger Dzingel, Secretary







 








 







THE TRANSFERABILITY OF THE UNITS REPRESENTED BY THIS CERTIFICATE IS RESTRICTED. SUCH UNITS
MAY NOT BE SOLD, ASSIGNED, OR TRANSFERRED, NOR WILL ANY ASSIGNEE, VENDEE, TRANSFEREE, OR ENDORSEE
THEREOF BE RECOGNIZED AS HAVING ACQUIRED ANY SUCH UNITS FOR ANY PURPOSE, UNLESS AND TO THE EXTENT
SUCH SALE, TRANSFER, HYPOTHETICATION OR ASSIGNMENT IS PERMITTED BY, AND IS COMPLETED IN STRICT
ACCORDANCE WITH, APPLICABLE STATE AND FEDERAL LAW AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS SET FORTH IN THE
MEMBER CONTROL AGREEMENT AND AGREED TO BY EACH MEMBER.



THE SECURITIES REPRESENTED BY THIS CERTIFICATE MAY NOT BE SOLD, OFFERED FOR SALE, OR TRANSFERRED IN
THE ABSENCE OF AN EFFECTIVE REGISTRATION UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED, AND UNDER
APPLICABLE STATE SECURITIES LAWS, OR AN OPINION OF COUNSEL SATISFACTORY TO THE COMPLAINT THAT SUCH
TRANSACTION IS EXEMPT FROM REGISTRATION UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED, AND UNDER
APPLICABLE STATE SECURITIES LAWS.
**EXHIBIT 21**

 

Subsidiaries of the Registrant 

 

S-K Item 601 (21) - Subsidiaries of the Registrant: 

 

Artist to Market Distribution LLC, a Michigan LLC 

 

Handleman Canada, Inc., a Canadian Corporation 

 

Handleman Category Management Company, a MichiganCorporation 

 

Handleman Company of Canada,Limited, an Ontario Corporation 

 

Handleman deArgentina S.R.L. 

 

Handleman de Mexico S.A. deC.V. 

 

Handleman do Brasil Commercial Ltda.

 

Handleman Distribution Company, a MichiganCorporation 

 

Handleman EntertainmentResources, L.L.C., a Michigan LLC 

 

HandlemanOntario Ltd., a British Virgin Islands Corporation 

 

Handleman Real Estate, LLC, a Michigan LLC 

 

Handleman UK Limited, a United Kingdom Corporation 

 

Hanley Advertising Company, a Michigan Corporation 

 

HCCL, LP, a Canadian Limited Partnership 

 

Lifetime Entertainment Limited, a United Kingdom Corporation 

 

Lifetime Holding, Inc., a Michigan Corporation 

 

Oasis Merchandisers Limited, a United Kingdom Corporation

 

Rackjobbing Services, S.A. de C.V.

 

The itsy bitsy Entertainment Company, aDelaware Corporation 

 

The itsy bitsyEntertainment Company (Canada) Ltd., a Canadian Corporation 

 

The itsy bitsy Entertainment Holding Company, a Michigan Corporation
#### Prudential Capital Corp., Respondent-Appellant, v. Royal Indemnity Company, Appellant-Respondent.

Order, entered on January 6, 1964, granting summary judgment, unanimously reversed, on the law, and the motion denied, with costs to abide the event. Plaintiff, a factor, sues an insurance company. It appears that plaintiff participated in the factoring of BojCraft Enterprises, Inc., by Whitehall Mercantile Corp., another factor. Bo-Craft Enterprises obtained advances from Whitehall on the strength of spurious invoices and documents of delivery, and losses were sustained as a result. Defendant resists payment on a broker’s blanket bond attached to an indemnity policy which it had issued to plaintiff, on several grounds. The policy provided against loss due to extending credit on any instruments “ which prove to have been counterfeited or forged as to the signature of any maker, drawer, issuer ... or as to the signature of any person signing in any other capacity ”, Defendant contends that this language docs not provide indemnity in regard to an instrument unless it contains a forged signature and that the coverage does not include such instruments as are entirely false, such as invoices purporting to be for sales when in fact no sale was ever made, or delivery documents when no goods were ever shipped. This conclusion is reached by interpreting the phrase to apply to instruments which are counterfeit by virtue of the fact that they are forged. This contention has received not inconsiderable support *(First Nat. Bank of South Carolina*v. *Glens Falls Ins. Co.,*304 F. 2d 866). The language has been interpreted, however, to include documents which are counterfeit in respects other than the forgery of signatures *(Fidelity Trust Co.*v. *American Sur. Co. of N. Y.,*174 F. Supp. 630, affd. 268 F. 2d 805). Whatever may be the true lexicographical interpretation, the test remains what the reasonable expectation of the ordinary businessman would be *(Harris*v. *Allstate Ins. Co.,*309 N. Y. 72, 75; Bird v. *St. Paul Fire & Mar. Ins. Co.,*224 N. Y. 47, 51). Applying this test we would agree with Special Term that losses incurred through reliance on entirely spurious documents are covered, even though no forged signature is involved. However, the ease presents other questions that are factual issues, which cannot be resolved on this record. Just what losses resulted from credit extension on the faith of counterfeit documents — including the question of whether the documents relied on were actually counterfeit — is not satisfactorily established. While in a sense this is a question of damage, it goes to the heart of the question of whether there is to be any recovery at all and, as such, should await trial. Furthermore, the record discloses the existence of other arguable issues. While these may possibly resolve into questions of law upon a full exploration of the facts, such an exploration is required for their proper resolution. Concur—Breitel, J. P., Rabin, McNally. Eager and Steuer, JJ.
#### § 634.18 Reinstatement of driving privileges.

Reinstatement of driving privileges shall be automatic, provided all revocations applicable have expired, proper proof of completion of remedial driving course and/or substance abuse counseling has been provided, and reinstatement requirements of individual's home state and/or state the individual may have been suspended in, have been met.
### §§1851, 1852. Repealed. Pub. L. 104–127, title II, §§274, 275, Apr. 4, 1996, 110 Stat. 976

Section 1851, acts May 28, 1956, ch. 327, title II, §201, 70 Stat. 198; Nov. 28, 1990, Pub. L. 101–624, title XV, §1576, 104 Stat. 3702, related to disposal of stocks by Commodity Credit Corporation.

Section 1852, acts May 28, 1956, ch. 327, title II, §202, 70 Stat. 199; Dec. 8, 1994, Pub. L. 103–465, title IV, §401(b)(1), 108 Stat. 4957, related to sale for export of domestically produced extra long staple cotton.
§ 775.2 Definitions. ( a ) *Action proponent.* The commander, commanding officer, or civilian director of a unit, activity, or organization who initiates a proposal for action, as defined in 40 CFR 1508.23, and who has command and control authority over the action once it is authorized. For some actions, the action proponent will also serve as the decision-making authority for that action. In specific circumstances, the action proponent and decision maker may be identified in Navy Regulations, other SECNAV Instructions, operational instructions and orders, acquisition instructions, and other sources which set out authority and responsibility within the DON.
( b ) *Environmental Impact Statement (EIS).* An environmental document prepared according to the requirements of Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) regulations (40 CFR parts 1500-1508) for a major action that will have a significant effect on the quality of the human environment.
( c ) *Environmental Assessment (EA).* A concise document prepared according to the requirements of 40 CFR parts 1500-1508 that briefly provides sufficient evidence and analysis for determining whether to prepare an EIS. An EA aids compliance with NEPA when no EIS is necessary and facilitates preparation of an EIS when one is necessary.
( d ) *Categorical Exclusion (CATEX).* A published category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a significant impact on the human environment under normal circumstances, and, therefore, do not require either an environmental assessment or an environmental impact statement.
( e ) *Record of Decision (ROD).* An environmental document signed by an appropriate official of the DON. A ROD sets out a concise summary of the final decision and selected measures for mitigation (if any) of adverse environmental impacts of the alternative chosen from those considered in an EIS.
( f ) *Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI).* A document that sets out the reasons why an action not otherwise categorically excluded will not have a significant impact on the human environment, and for which an EIS will not therefore be prepared. A FONSI will include the EA or a summary of it and shall note any other environmental documents related to it. A FONSI may be one result of review of an EA.
[69 FR 8109, Feb. 23, 2004]
**EXHIBIT 32.2****SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**I, Richard L. Travis, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of Ennis, Inc. (the “Company”), certify, thatpursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code:(1) The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period endedMay 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operationsof the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in theReport.       /s/ Richard L. Travis, Jr.         Richard L. Travis, Jr.    Chief Financial Officer    Date: July 10, 2006  *The foregoing Certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350; it is notbeing filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act, and is not to beincorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the datehereof, regardless of any general incorporation languages in such filing.*
**UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION**

# OFFICE OF THE  SECRETARY

         February 2, 2010

MEMORANDUM

TO:          Addressees (See Below)

FROM:Director, Risk Management Service

Office of the Secretary

SUBJECT: Amendment to the Redelegation of Authority for Grants and Cooperative Agreements 

I.DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY

Under the authority vested in me from the Secretary by delegation EA/EAR/165, certified on March 26, 2008, I hereby amend your respective redelegations of authority to perform the functions related to the award, management and oversight of formula and discretionary grants and cooperative agreements within your programmatic authority, certified on April 11, 2008, to include the authority to approve State applications, consolidated State applications, State plans, and consolidated State plans for formula grants.

II. RESERVATIONS

The provisions under the “Reservations” section in the original delegation apply to this amendment.

III.REDELEGATION

The provision under the “Redelegation” section in the original delegation applies to this amendment.

IV. CERTIFICATION AND EFFECTIVE DATE

This amendment is effective upon certification by the Department's Principal Delegations Control Officer and supersedes all previous delegations of this 

Page 2 -  Amendment to the Redelegation of Authority for Grants and Cooperative Agreements

authority.  I ratify actions within the scope of this delegation taken by the addressees prior to the date of certification.

      _________/s/____________

                       Phil Maestri

OGC Clearance and Date:  /s/ David  Berthiaume, 1/15/2010

ADDRESSEE LIST:

Deputy Secretary   

Assistant Secretary for Special Education and Rehabilitative Services 

Assistant Secretary for Postsecondary Education    ◄▬▬▬

Assistant Deputy Secretary for Safe and Drug-Free Schools

Director, Institute of Education Sciences

Assistant Secretary for Elementary and Secondary Education

Assistant Deputy Secretary and Director for English Language Acquisition

Assistant Deputy Secretary for Innovation and Improvement

Assistant Secretary for Vocational and Adult Education

Certified Date:    2/2/2010

Departmental Delegations Control Officer:  /s/ Naty G. Beetle

Control Number:   EAR/EP/350-A
EXHIBIT 32.1
           Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to
                 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with this quarterly report of Espey Mfg. & Electronics  Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended  September 30, 2006 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof,  I, Howard  Pinsley,
President and Chief Executive  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

      1.    The report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The  information  contained in this report fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

Date: November 14, 2006


                                               /s/ Howard Pinsley
                                               -----------------------------
                                               Howard Pinsley, President and
                                               Chief Executive Officer


                                       16
Exhibit 23.3



|     |  | 
|---- |  | 
|LOGO

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS

As independent petroleum engineers, Haas Petroleum Engineering Services, Inc. hereby consents to all references to our firm included in or
made a part of the EXCO Resources, Inc. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 and further consents to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-159930,
333-156086, 333-132551, 333-133481, and 333-146376) and on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-142361 and 333-145885) of EXCO Resources, Inc. of information from our reserve report dated January 7, 2010 on the estimated proved oil and natural gas
reserve quantities of EXCO Resources, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries presented as of December 31, 2009.



|                                         
|-----------------------------------------
|                                         
|                                         
|/s/ Robert W. Haas                       
|Haas Petroleum Engineering Services, Inc.

Dallas, Texas

February 16, 2010
### §§369 to 376. Repealed. Aug. 11, 1955, ch. 790, §2, 69 Stat. 674

Section 369, act Mar. 16, 1906, ch. 951, §1, 34 Stat. 63, authorized annual appropriations for agricultural experiment stations. See section 361c of this title.

Section 369a, acts June 20, 1936, ch. 631, §§1, 2, 49 Stat. 1553, 1554; Aug. 29, 1950, ch. 820, 64 Stat. 563, extended provisions of former sections 343a, 343b, 361, 366, 369, 370, 371, 373 to 376, 380, and 382 of this title to Alaska. See section 361a of this title.

Section 370, act Feb. 24, 1925, ch. 308, §1, 43 Stat. 970, authorized an additional appropriation of $60,000 for each fiscal year. See section 361c of this title.

Section 371, acts Mar. 16, 1906, ch. 951, §2, 34 Stat. 63; Feb. 24, 1925, ch. 308, §2, 43 Stat. 971, made grants of money authorized for agricultural experiment stations subject to the legislative assent of the several States and Territories.

Section 372, act June 7, 1888, ch. 373, 25 Stat. 176, provided for assent to installments of appropriations when the legislature is not in session.

Section 373, acts Mar. 16, 1906, ch. 951, §2, 34 Stat. 63; Feb. 24, 1925, ch. 308, §2, 43 Stat. 971, prescribed the time and manner of payments to agricultural experiment stations and required a report of expenditures to the Secretary of Agriculture. See sections 361c and 361e of this title.

Section 374, acts Mar. 16, 1906, ch. 951, §3, 34 Stat. 63; Feb. 24, 1925, ch. 308, §3, 43 Stat. 971, required the State to replace moneys misapplied. See section 361e of this title.

Section 375, acts Mar. 16, 1906, ch. 951, §3, 34 Stat. 63; Feb. 24, 1925, ch. 308, §3, 43 Stat. 971, permitted use of funds for purchase, repairs, etc., of buildings, or for purchase or rental of lands. See section 361d of this title.

Section 376, acts Mar. 16, 1906, ch. 951, §4, 34 Stat. 64; Feb. 24, 1925, ch. 308, §4, 43 Stat. 971, provided for certification of amounts due States for agricultural experiment stations, for withholding certificate, and for redress by Congress. See section 361g of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Existing Rights and Liabilities

Any rights or liabilities existing under sections 369 to 376 as unaffected by repeal, see section 2 of act Aug. 11, 1955, set out as a note under former section 361 of this title.
### §244. Quality and value standards

If standards for the evaluation or determination of the quality or value of an agricultural product are not established under another Federal law, the Secretary may establish standards for the evaluation or determination of the quality or value of the agricultural product under this chapter.

(Aug. 11, 1916, ch. 313, pt. C, §5, as added Pub. L. 106–472, title II, §201, Nov. 9, 2000, 114 Stat. 2064.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 244, acts Aug. 11, 1916, ch. 313, pt. C, §4, 39 Stat. 486; Mar. 2, 1931, ch. 366, §1, 46 Stat. 1463, authorized licensing of warehousemen, prior to the general amendment of this chapter by Pub. L. 106–472. See section 242 of this title.

A prior section 5 of act Aug. 11, 1916, ch. 313, pt. C, was classified to section 245 of this title, prior to the general amendment of this chapter by Pub. L. 106–472.
§ 720.4 Persons stationed outside the United States. ( a ) *Persons desired by local U.S. authorities.* When delivery of any member in the Navy or Marine Corps, or any civilian employee or dependent, is desired for trial by state authorities and the individual whose presence is sought is stationed outside the United States, the provisions of subpart D of this part will be followed. In all such cases, the nearest judge advocate of the Navy or Marine Corps shall be consulted before any action is taken.
( b ) *Members desired by U.S. Federal authorities.* When delivery of any member of the Navy or Marine Corps is desired for trial in a Federal district court, upon appropriate representation by the Department of Justice to the Secretary of the Navy (Judge Advocate General), the member will be returned to the United States at the expense of the Department of the Navy and held at a military facility convenient to the Department of the Navy and to the Department of Justice. Delivery may be accomplished as set forth in § 720.7, subject to the exceptions in § 720.9.
# Overview ofClothes Washer Rulemaking Status Clothes Washer Workshop**(~**

/

# Clothes Washer Workshop 

# Revisions to Analyses • NOPR Analyses • Life-Cycle-Cost - includes marginal energy and water rates • National Energy Savings - includes new shipment forecast • Consumer Survey - completed**~I** ' Q

II I r;l ,,_-4-1- .-...-.. 

## "'°' T- _ l_ - f-- vlU**lllC~** 

## vv 

## asne**Revi~ions** 

# to Analyses NOPR Analyses (cont'd) • Shipments Analysis - new spreadsheet developed • Manufacturer Impact Analysis - GRIM Spreadsheet • Net National Employment - new results • Environmental Assessment - new results**~)** '

I
EXHIBIT
32.1
 Certification
of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
 as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 In
connection with this quarterly report of Espey Mfg. & Electronics Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “report”), I, Mark
St. Pierre, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:
 
 1.
              The
      report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
 
 2.
              The
      information contained in this report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.
 
 Date: May
12, 2010
 
 /s/Mark
      St.PierreMark
      St. PierrePresident
      andChief
      Executive Officer
 
 
 16
#### § 228.15 Restriction regarding animals.

No animals except guide dogs for the blind or hearing impaired, or guard or search dogs used by authorized state or federal officials, shall be brought upon protected property, except as authorized by the NSA Director of Security or his designee at each Agency facility.