alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 542 

To amend title 9, United States Code, with respect to arbitration. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 7, 2017 

Mr. WHITEHOUSE (for himself, Mr. LEAHY, Mrs. MURRAY, Mr. DURBIN, Mr. 

FRANKEN, Ms. HIRONO, Mr. MARKEY, and Mr. MERKLEY) introduced 

the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee 

on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 9, United States Code, with respect to 

arbitration. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Safety Over Arbitra5 tion Act of 2017’’. 

6 SEC. 2. ARBITRATION OF DISPUTES INVOLVING HAZARDS 

7 TO PUBLIC HEALTH AND SAFETY. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Title 9, United States Code, is 

9 amended by adding at the end the following: 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 542 IS

1 ‘‘CHAPTER 4—ARBITRATION OF DISPUTES 

2 INVOLVING HAZARDS TO PUBLIC 

3 HEALTH AND SAFETY 

‘‘Sec. 

‘‘401. Definition. 

‘‘402. Election of arbitration. 

4 ‘‘SEC. 401. DEFINITION. 

5 ‘‘In this chapter, the term ‘hazard to public health 

6 or safety’ means an activity, substance, or condition that 

7 has a potential to cause harm to the health or safety of 

8 the public. 

9 ‘‘SEC. 402. ELECTION OF ARBITRATION. 

10 ‘‘(a) CONSENT REQUIRED.—Notwithstanding any 

11 other provision of law, whenever a contract between an 

12 individual and another party requires the use of arbitra13 tion to resolve a claim or controversy alleging facts rel14 evant to a hazard to public health or safety, arbitration 

15 may be used to resolve such claim or controversy only if, 

16 after such controversy arises, all parties to such con17 troversy consent in writing to use arbitration. 

18 ‘‘(b) EXPLANATION REQUIRED.—Notwithstanding 

19 any other provision of law, whenever arbitration is elected 

20 to resolve a claim or controversy pursuant to subsection 

21 (a), the arbitrator shall provide the parties to such con22 tract with a written explanation of the factual and legal 

23 basis for any award or other outcome, which shall not be 

24 made under seal by the arbitrator or a court. 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 542 IS

1 ‘‘(c) APPLICATION.—This section shall apply to any 

2 contract entered into after the date of enactment of this 

3 chapter.’’. 

4 (b) TECHNICAL AND CONFORMING AMENDMENT.— 

5 The table of chapters for title 9, United States Code, is 

6 amended by adding at the end the following: 

‘‘4. Arbitration of disputes involving hazards to public 

health and safety ................................................... 401’’. 

Æ 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
THE SECRETARY OF EDUCATION

WASHINGTON, DC 20202

TO: Director

Institute of Education Sciences 

FROM: The Secretary

SUBJECT: Amendment to the Primary Delegation of Programmatic Authority, Including 

Authority to Obligate Gift Funds Accepted by the Department 

I. DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY

Under the authority vested in me by section 412 of the Department of Education 

Organization Act, 20 U.S.C. § 3472, I hereby amend the delegation of programmatic 

authority to you, EA/ER/5, certified on January 18, 2006, to include the following 

programmatic and obligation of gift fund authorities:

to administer the Institute of Education Sciences’ (IES’) Digital Learning Platform 

(DLP) X-Prize Competition under the authority of sections 111(b)(1) and 112 of the 

Education Sciences Reform Act of 2002, 20 U.S.C. §§ 9511(b)(1) and 9512, and 

15 U.S.C. § 3719 and to obligate gift funds that the Department of Education has 

accepted in carrying out IES’ activities. 

The authority is delegated to you, your successor in function, or anyone serving for you 

in an acting capacity or delegated the authority to perform the functions and duties of 

your position. Unless otherwise noted in future delegations of authority, amendments to 

the authorities delegated herein are included within the scope of this delegation. 

II. RESERVATIONS

Unless otherwise noted in existing or future delegations of authority, the following are 

not delegated: 

A. The authority to sign documents for publication in the Federal Register other than 

those documents designated in the blanket delegation of authority to sign Federal 

Register documents issued to Principal Officers, EA/GEN/18, certified on 

December 12, 2019; 

B. The authority to appoint, and fix compensation of, members of advisory councils; 

and
Page 2 – Amendment No. 2 to the Primary Delegation of Programmatic Authority

C. Unless otherwise provided by law, the authority to submit reports to Congress or 

the President.

III. REDELEGATION

Subject to applicable provisions of law, and unless otherwise noted, you may redelegate 

the authority delegated to you and may authorize further redelegation. All redelegations 

must be prepared in accordance with the Administrative Communications System 

directive, OM:1-102: Delegations of Authority. 

IV. CERTIFICATION AND EFFECTIVE DATE

This delegation is effective upon certification by the Department's Principal Delegations 

Control Officer. 

 ___________/s_______________ 

 Miguel A. Cardona 

OGC Clearance and Date: Debbie Friendly, 4/12/2021 

Departmental Delegations Control Officer: Jim Clemmens

Date certified: 4/13/2021 

Control Number: EA/ER/116
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-29-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1999
<CASH>                                      13,801,000
<SECURITIES>                                 7,467,000
<RECEIVABLES>                               15,631,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,001,000
<INVENTORY>                                 68,344,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           105,542,000
<PP&E>                                     305,143,000
<DEPRECIATION>                             155,007,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             282,751,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      177,991,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       115,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  27,421,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               282,751,000
<SALES>                                    465,178,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           465,178,000
<CGS>                                      344,863,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              344,863,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           114,434,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           6,725,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (844,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (844,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (844,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.08)


</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of the Accounting of John T. Meehan, Public Administrator of Bronx County, as Administrator of the Estate of Clarke W. Mecum, Deceased, Respondent. Stackell & Stackell, Appellants; Rosalind Mecum, Respondent.

Decree, entered May 28, 1963, settling the final account of Public Administrator, unanimously affirmed, and appeal from order entered June 21, 1963, denying motion denominated as one for resettlement, unanimously dismissed, with costs to the Public Administrator payable out of the estate, and without costs to any other party. In view of the record of the proceedings in open court before the Surrogate there is no need to compel the formal execution of a general release by Mrs. Mecum. The record *824is itself ample evidence of the settlement and her voluntary agreement to release generally the attorneys. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, Stevens and Eager, JJ.
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1454 

Censuring Representatives Bennie Thompson, Troy Carter, Barbara Lee, 

Frederica Wilson, Yvette Clarke, Bonnie Watson Coleman, Jasmine 

Crockett, Joyce Beatty, and Steve Cohen for inciting violence, including 

two assassination attempts, against President Donald Trump. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 17, 2024 

Ms. GREENE of Georgia submitted the following resolution; which was referred 

to the Committee on Ethics 

RESOLUTION 

Censuring Representatives Bennie Thompson, Troy Carter, 

Barbara Lee, Frederica Wilson, Yvette Clarke, Bonnie 

Watson Coleman, Jasmine Crockett, Joyce Beatty, and 

Steve Cohen for inciting violence, including two assassination attempts, against President Donald Trump. 

Whereas Representative Bennie Thompson has introduced H. 

R. 8081, the DISGRACED Former Protectees Act, targeting President Donald J. Trump by attempting to remove his United States Secret Service protection, which 

is granted to all former presidents; 

Whereas Representatives Troy Carter, Barbara Lee, Frederica Wilson, Yvette Clarke, Bonnie Watson Coleman, 

Jasmine Crockett, Joyce Beatty, and Steve Cohen are cosponsors of the bill; 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1454 IH 

Whereas a staffer of Representative Bennie Thompson said 

after the first assassination attempt on President Trump, 

‘‘I don’t condone violence but please get you some shooting lessons so you don’t miss next time . . . oops that 

wasn’t me talking.’’; 

Whereas Representative Jasmine Crockett lashed out in a recent interview, just hours before the second assassination 

attempt on President Trump, saying, ‘‘MAGA in general—they are threats to us domestically.’’; 

Whereas Representative Steve Cohen said, ‘‘Trump is an 

enemy of the United States.’’; and 

Whereas Representative Joyce Beatty said President Trump 

‘‘stepped on our democracy. He defied the Constitution.’’: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That— 

2 (1) the House of Representatives censures Rep3 resentatives Bennie Thompson, Troy Carter, Bar4 bara Lee, Frederica Wilson, Yvette Clark, Bonnie 

5 Coleman, Jasmine Crockett, Joyce Beatty, and Steve 

6 Cohen, for inciting violence, including two assassina7 tion attempts, against President Donald Trump; 

8 (2) these Representatives will forthwith present 

9 themselves in the well of the House of Representa10 tives for the pronouncement of censure; and 

11 (3) these Representatives will be censured with 

12 the public reading of this resolution by the Speaker. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
CERTIFICATIONS

                                  EXHIBIT 31.2


I,  Irwin Pearl, the Registrant's Chief Financial Officer, certify that:

1. I have reviewed  this  quarterly  report on Form 10-QSB of Orion  Diversified
Technologies, Inc.;

2. Based on my  knowledge,  this  quarterly  report  does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made, not  misleading  with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included in this quarterly  report,  fairly present in all material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. I am responsible for  establishing  and maintaining  disclosure  controls and
procedures  (as  defined  in  Exchange  Act Rules  13a-14  and  15d-14)  for the
registrant  and I have: a) designed such  disclosure  controls and procedures to
ensure that  material  information  relating to the  Registrant,  including  its
consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to me by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
b) evaluated  the  effectiveness  of the  Registrant's  disclosure  controls and
procedures  as of a date  within  45  days  prior  to the  filing  date  of this
quarterly  report (the  "Evaluation  Date");  and c) presented in this quarterly
report our conclusions  about the  effectiveness of the disclosure  controls and
procedures based on my evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. I have disclosed,  based on my most recent  evaluation,  to the  Registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of Registrant's  board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent  function):  a) all  significant  deficiencies  in the
design or  operation  of  internal  controls  which could  adversely  affect the
Registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and
have  identified  for the  Registrant's  auditors  any  material  weaknesses  in
internal  controls;  and b) any fraud,  whether or not  material,  that involves
management or other  employees who have a significant  role in the  Registrant's
internal controls; and

6. I have  indicated  in  this  quarterly  report  whether  or  not  there  were
significant  changes  in  internal  controls  or in  other  factors  that  could
significantly  affect internal controls subsequent to the date of my most recent
evaluation,   including  any  corrective  actions  with  regard  to  significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: December 15, 2004

/s/  Irwin Pearl
-----------------------
Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

                       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             As Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and in connection with the annual report on Form
10-KSB of Provectus  Pharmaceuticals,  Inc. (the  "Company")  for the year ended
December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"),  the  undersigned,  H. Craig Dees,  Ph.D., the Chief
Executive  Officer  of the  Company,  and  Peter R.  Culpepper,  CPA,  the Chief
Financial  Officer of the  Company  hereby  certify  that (1) the  Report  fully
complies  with the  requirements  of  Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities
Exchange Act of 1934,  and (2) the  information  contained in the Report  fairly
presents,  in all material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of
operations of the Company.

     This Certification is signed on March 30, 2004.


                                                 /s/  H. Craig Dees, Ph.D.
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 H. Craig Dees, Ph.D.
                                                 Chief Executive Officer

                                                 /s/  Peter R. Culpepper, CPA
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 Peter R. Culpepper, CPA
                                                 Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT
32.1





Section
1350 Certification


By
Principal Executive Officer





I, Daniel
Greenberg, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the quarterly report
on Form 10-Q of Electro Rent Corporation (the “Company”) for the quarter ended
November 30, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in
such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.





A
signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission upon request.





Date:  December
      21, 2010/s/ Daniel GreenbergDaniel
      GreenbergChief
      Executive Officer
§ 776.35 Declining or terminating representation. ( a ) Except as stated in paragraph (c) of this section, a covered attorney shall not represent a client or, when representation has commenced, shall seek to withdraw from the representation of a client if: ( 1 ) The representation will result in violation of subpart B of this part or other law or regulation;
( 2 ) The covered attorney's physical or mental condition materially impairs his or her ability to represent the client; or
( 3 ) The covered attorney is dismissed by the client.
( b ) Except as stated in paragraph (c) of this section, a covered attorney may seek to withdraw from representing a client if withdrawal can be accomplished without material adverse effect on the interests of the client, or if: ( 1 ) The client persists in a course of action involving the covered attorney's services that the covered attorney reasonably believes is criminal or fraudulent;
( 2 ) The client has used the covered attorney's services to perpetrate a crime or fraud;
( 3 ) The client insists upon pursuing an objective that the covered attorney considers repugnant or imprudent;
( 4 ) In the case of covered non-USG attorneys, the representation will result in an unreasonable financial burden on the attorney or has been rendered unreasonably difficult by the client; or
( 5 ) Other good cause for withdrawal exists.
( c ) A covered attorney must comply with applicable law requiring notice to or permission of a tribunal when terminating a representation. When ordered to do so by a tribunal or other competent authority, a covered attorney shall continue representation notwithstanding good cause for terminating the representation.
( d ) Upon termination of representation, a covered attorney shall take steps to the extent reasonably practicable to protect a client's interests, such as giving reasonable notice to the client, allowing time for assignment or employment of other counsel, and surrendering papers and property to which the client is entitled and, where a non-USG attorney provided representation, refunding any advance payment of fee that has not been earned. The covered attorney may retain papers relating to the client to the extent permitted by law.
( e ) [Reserved]
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Esterline Technologies Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q
for the period ended April 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-Q), I, R. Bradley Lawrence, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)        The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)        The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





|                    |  |  |  |     |  |                                      
|------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------
|Dated: June 3, 2010 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ R. Bradley Lawrence              
|                    |  |  |  |     |  | R. Bradley Lawrence                  
|                    |  |  |  |     |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
§ 536.103 Statutory authority for claims cognizable under international claims agreements. The authority for claims presented or processed under this subpart is set forth in the following federal laws and bi- or multinational agreements: ( a ) 10 U.S.C. 2734a and 10 U.S.C. 2734b (the International Agreements Claims Act) as amended, for claims arising overseas under international agreements.
( b ) Various international agreements, such as the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA) and the Partnership for Peace (PFP) SOFA.
#### Intercontinental Planning, Limited, Respondent, v. Daystrom, Incorporated et al., Appellants.

Orders, entered on December 14, 1962 and February 4, 1963, unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondent. No opinion. Resettled order entered on April 25, 1963, denying defendant Schlumberger N. V. (Schlumberger, Limited) time to make motions addressed to the complaint and directing defendants to produce their officers and employees before a Special Referee to give testimony, unanimously modified, on the law, on the facts and in the exercise of discretion to the extent of limiting the scope of the examination to whether Schlumberger was the agent of Daystrom for the purpose of service of process, and, as so modified, affirmed, without costs. The resettled order as entered was too broad. Concur —■ Botein, P. J., Rabin, McNally, Stevens and Eager, JJ.
IV 

House Calendar No. 101 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1616 

[Report No. 118–886] 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 115) to amend chapter 8 of 

title 5, United States Code, to provide for en bloc consideration in 

resolutions of disapproval for ‘‘midnight rules’’, and for other purposes.’’ 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 16, 2024 

Mr. BURGESS, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 115) to amend 

chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, to provide 

for en bloc consideration in resolutions of disapproval 

for ‘‘midnight rules’’, and for other purposes.’’ 

1 Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it 

2 shall be in order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 

3 115) to amend chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, 

4 to provide for en bloc consideration in resolutions of dis5 approval for ‘‘midnight rules’’, and for other purposes. All 

6 points of order against consideration of the bill are waived. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HRES 1616 RH 

1 The amendment in the nature of a substitute rec2 ommended by the Committee on the Judiciary now printed 

3 in the bill shall be considered as adopted. The bill, as 

4 amended, shall be considered as read. All points of order 

5 against provisions in the bill, as amended, are waived. The 

6 previous question shall be considered as ordered on the 

7 bill, as amended, and on any further amendment thereto 

8 to final passage without intervening motion except: (1) one 

9 hour of debate equally divided and controlled by the chair 

10 and ranking minority member of the Committee on the 

11 Judiciary or their respective designees; and (2) one motion 

12 to recommit. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB

kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
House Calendar No. 101 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1616 

[Report No. 118–886] 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 115) 

for other purposes.’’ olutions of disapproval for ‘‘midnight rules’’, and Code, to provide for en bloc consideration in resto amend chapter 8 of title 5, United States 

DECEMBER 16, 2024 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB