alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                      12,578,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  202,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            13,014,000
<PP&E>                                         276,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                (62,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              13,636,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          347,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       144,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  13,145,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                13,636,000
<SALES>                                      9,641,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             9,641,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,650,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              6,593,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 2,797,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          3,796,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,796,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .23
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit (32)(b)**

 

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of The Empire District Electric Company(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2009 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),Gregory A. Knapp, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 
| By                                                           |   /s/  Gregory A. Knapp |   |
|--------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------|--------|
| Name:  Gregory A. Knapp                                      |                              |
| Title:  Vice President - Finance and Chief Financial Officer |                              |

 

Date:   May 7,2009

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 or otherdocument authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature thatappears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statementrequired by Section 906, has been provided to The Empire District ElectricCompany and will be retained by The Empire District Electric Company andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
#### In the Matter of Willard Wilcox.

Order of substitution of attorneys entered.
#### § 239.14 On-site inspections.

The HQUSACE and its major subordinate commands may conduct periodic on-site inspections of district offices and monitor program execution through HAPMIS and CEFMS reports.
### §3811. Issuance of regulations; maintenance of records

The Secretary is authorized to issue such regulations and to require the maintenance of such records as he deems necessary to carry out the provisions of this chapter.

(Pub. L. 96–468, §11, formerly §12, Oct. 17, 1980, 94 Stat. 2233; renumbered §11, Pub. L. 104–127, title IX, §914(b)(2), Apr. 4, 1996, 110 Stat. 1186.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 11 of Pub. L. 96–468 was classified to section 3810 of this title prior to repeal by Pub. L. 104–127.
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D17-4741

_____________________________

STANLEY GORDON WHEELER, JR.,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County.

Jan Shackelford, Judge.

June 5, 2018

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

MAKAR, WINOKUR, and WINSOR, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant 

Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
#### The People of the State of New York v. Nathan Miller.

Motion for leave to dispense with printing granted insofar as to permit the appeal to be heard on the original record, without printing the same, except that a certified copy of the information shall be substituted in place of the original information, and upon typewritten or mimeographed appellant’s points, on condition that the appellant serves one copy of the typewritten or mimeographed appellant’s points upon the District Attorney of New York County, and files • 6 typewritten or 19 mimeographed copies of appellant’s points, together with the original record with this court, and on the further condition that the appeal be perfected and noticed for argument for the March 1961 Term of this court. Concur — Botein, P. J., Valente, Stevens, Eager and Bergan, JJ.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

November 29, 2021

No. 04

- 21

- 00436

- CV

IN RE THOMAS TERAN AND RUIZ AND SONS, INC.

From the 166th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2020CI02455

Honorable Laura Salinas , Judge Presiding



### ORDER

On October 12, 2021, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. This court believes a

serious question concerning the mandamus relief sought requires further consideration. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52.8(b). The respondent and the real party in interest may file a response to the

petition in this court by December 14, 20 21

. Any such res ponse must conform to Texas Rule of

Appellate Procedure 52.4.

It is so ORDERED on November 29, 2021

.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: _____________________________

Michael A. Cruz

, Clerk of Court
### §1831. Repealed. Pub. L. 89–321, title VI, §601, Nov. 3, 1965, 79 Stat. 1206

Section, acts May 28, 1956, ch. 327, title I, §107, 70 Stat. 191; June 11, 1960, Pub. L. 86–507, §1(8), 74 Stat. 200; June 29, 1961, Pub. L. 87–62, §1(a), 75 Stat. 129; July 3, 1962, Pub. L. 87–521, 76 Stat. 135, set out terms to be included in producers' contracts under conservation reserve program and made provisions for use of advertising and bid procedures, termination of contracts, and notice, hearing, and judicial review of Secretary's action in terminating a contract.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Savings Provision

Pub. L. 89–321, title VI, §601, Nov. 3, 1965, 79 Stat. 1206, provided that the Soil Bank Act of 1956 [former subchapters I to III of this chapter] shall remain in effect with respect to contracts entered into thereunder prior to its repeal by section 601 of Pub. L. 89–321.
§ 2001.41 Responsibilities of holders. Authorized persons who have access to classified information are responsible for: ( a ) Protecting it from persons without authorized access to that information, to include securing it in approved equipment or facilities whenever it is not under the direct control of an authorized person;
( b ) Meeting safeguarding requirements prescribed by the agency head; and
( c ) Ensuring that classified information is not communicated over unsecured voice or data circuits, in public conveyances or places, or in any other manner that permits interception by unauthorized persons.
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

UNILOC 2017 LLC,

Appellant

v.

APPLE INC.,

Cross-Appellant

HTC CORP., HTC AMERICA, INC.,

Appellees

ANDREW HIRSHFELD, PERFORMING THE 

FUNCTIONS AND DUTIES OF THE UNDER 

SECRETARY OF COMMERCE FOR 

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND DIRECTOR OF 

THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK 

OFFICE,

Intervenor

______________________

2020-1306, 2020-1317, 2020-1326

______________________

Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark 

Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2018-

00424, IPR2018-01028, IPR2018-01631, IPR2018-01653.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

Case: 20-1306 Document: 93 Page: 1 Filed: 05/10/2021
JEFFREY A. STEPHENS, Etheridge Law Group, Southlake, TX, argued for appellant. Also represented by JAMES 

ETHERIDGE, RYAN S. LOVELESS, BRETT MANGRUM. 

 ELIZABETH MOULTON, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe 

LLP, Menlo Park, CA, argued for cross-appellant and appellees. Cross-appellant also represented by MELANIE L.

BOSTWICK, BENJAMIN PAUL CHAGNON, MARK S. DAVIES, 

Washington, DC. 

 FRED WILLIAMS, Williams Simons & Landis PLLC, 

Austin, TX, for appellees. Also represented by TODD ERIC 

LANDIS, Dallas, TX. 

 

 ROBERT MCBRIDE, Office of the Solicitor, United States 

Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, for intervenor. Also represented by THOMAS W. KRAUSE, FARHEENA 

YASMEEN RASHEED, MOLLY R. SILFEN.

 ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

 PER CURIAM (DYK, MAYER, and HUGHES, Circuit 

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT 

May 10, 2021 

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Case: 20-1306 Document: 93 Page: 2 Filed: 05/10/2021
### §1765d–1. Repealed. Pub. L. 107–228, div. A, title II, §213, Sept. 30, 2002, 116 Stat. 1365

Section, Pub. L. 106–387, §1(a) [title VII, §738], Oct. 28, 2000, 114 Stat. 1549, 1549A–34; Pub. L. 110–246, title III, §3001(b)(1)(A), (2)(BB), June 18, 2008, 122 Stat. 1820, 1821, related to sale or disposal of foreign residences purchased by the United States for housing agricultural attachés.
Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide, Inc.
 Calculation of Ratio of Earnings to Total Fixed Charges
 Year Ended December 31,2010
    
    
    2009
    
    
    2008
    
    
    2007
    
    
    2006(Dollars in millions, except ratio)Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes
    
    $
    335
    
    
    $
    (296
    )
    
    $
    321
    
    
    $
    716
    
    
    $
    663(Income) loss related to equity method investees
    
    
    (10
    )
    
    
    4
    
    
    
    (16
    )
    
    
    (66
    )
    
    
    (61
    )325
    
    
    
    (292
    )
    
    
    305
    
    
    
    650
    
    
    
    602Add/(deduct):Fixed Charges
    
    
    313
    
    
    
    312
    
    
    
    300
    
    
    
    265
    
    
    
    317Interest Capitalized
    
    
    (30
    )
    
    
    (34
    )
    
    
    (35
    )
    
    
    (47
    )
    
    
    (27
    )Distributed income of equity method investees
    
    
    59
    
    
    
    39
    
    
    
    48
    
    
    
    142
    
    
    
    84Noncontrolling interest in pre-tax loss (income)
    
    
    2
    
    
    
    2
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (1
    )
    
    
    (1
    )Earnings available for fixed charges
    
    $
    669
    
    
    $
    27
    
    
    $
    618
    
    
    $
    1,009
    
    
    $
    975Fixed Charges:Interest and other financial charges
    
    $
    255
    
    
    $
    249
    
    
    $
    233
    
    
    $
    188
    
    
    $
    262Interest factor attributable to rentals (a)
    
    
    28
    
    
    
    29
    
    
    
    32
    
    
    
    30
    
    
    
    28Interest capitalized
    
    
    30
    
    
    
    34
    
    
    
    35
    
    
    
    47
    
    
    
    27Total fixed charges
    
    $
    313
    
    
    $
    312
    
    
    $
    300
    
    
    $
    265
    
    
    $
    317Ratio of earnings to fixed charges
    
    
    2.14
    
    
    
    0.09
    
    
    
    2.06
    
    
    
    3.81
    
    
    
    3.08
 
 Notes:(a)
    
    The interest factor attributable to rentals consists of one-third of rental charges, which is deemed by Starwood to be
representative of the interest factor inherent in rents.
Editorial Note on Part 842
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 842 appear at 81 FR 83688, Nov. 22, 2016.

§ 842.53 Who are not proper claimants. Persons who are not proper claimants include: ( a ) Insurers and other subrogees.
( b ) Persons determined to be U.S. inhabitants. U.S. inhabitants include dependents of U.S. military personnel and U.S. Government civilian employees.
( c ) Foreign military personnel suffering personal injury, or death arising incident to service or pursuant to combined and/or joint military operations. Such operations include, but are not limited to, military exercises and United Nations, NATO, and other regional peacekeeping and humanitarian missions.
( d ) Civilian employees of the United States, including local inhabitants, injured in the scope of their employment.
( e ) National governments and their political subdivisions engaging in war or armed conflict with the United States or its allies. This includes factions that have not necessarily been recognized by the international community as a legitimate nation state.
( f ) A national or nationally controlled corporation of a country engaging in war or armed conflict with the United States or its allies, unless the FCC or local military commander determines the claimant is friendly with the United States.
[55 FR 2809, Jan. 29, 1990. Redesignated and amended at 81 FR 83692, 83693, Nov. 22, 2016]
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 161 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 161

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Science, Space, 
         and Technology in the One Hundred Eighteenth Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 24, 2023

    Mr. Lucas (for himself and Ms. Lofgren) submitted the following 
resolution; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Science, Space, 
         and Technology in the One Hundred Eighteenth Congress.

    Resolved,

SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES.

    For the expenses of the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology 
(hereafter in this resolution referred to as the ``Committee''), 
including the expenses of all staff salaries, there shall be paid, out 
of the applicable accounts of the House of Representatives for 
committee salaries and expenses, not more than $16,291,019 for the One 
Hundred Eighteenth Congress.

SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS.

    Of the amount specified in section 1--
            (1) not more than $7,902,914 shall be available for 
        expenses incurred during the period beginning at noon on 
        January 3, 2023, and ending immediately before noon on January 
        3, 2024; and
            (2) not more than $8,388,105 shall be available for 
        expenses incurred during the period beginning at noon on 
        January 3, 2024, and ending immediately before noon on January 
        3, 2025.

SEC. 3. VOUCHERS.

    Payments under this resolution shall be made on vouchers authorized 
by the Committee, signed by the Chairman of the Committee, and approved 
in the manner directed by the Committee on House Administration.

SEC. 4. REGULATIONS.

    Amounts made available under this resolution shall be expended in 
accordance with regulations prescribed by the Committee on House 
Administration.
                                 <all>
```
NUMBERS 13-21-00366-CR & 13-21-00367-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG

 

EMILIO VARGAS, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

On appeal from the 214th District Court

of Nueces County, Texas.

ORDER OF ABATEMENT

Before Justices Hinojosa, Tijerina, and Silva

Order Per Curiam

This cause is before the Court on its own motion. Appellant, Emilio Vargas, filed a 

notice of appeal with this Court from convictions in trial court cause numbers 21FC-1613F 

and 21FC-0220F. The trial court's certifications of the defendant's right to appeal show

that the defendant waived his right of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2).

On October 27, 2021, we ordered appellant's counsel to, within thirty days, review 
2

the record and advise this Court as to whether appellant has a right to appeal. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 44.3, 44.4. Counsel failed to respond to this Court’s order and did not file a 

response.

Therefore, we abate this appeal and remand this cause to the trial court for a 

hearing to determine (1) whether the trial court’s certification of appealability is correct 

and (2) whether the appellant has the right of appeal. We further direct the trial court to 

issue findings of fact and conclusions of law regarding these issues. The trial court's 

amended certification, if any, and any orders it enters shall be included in a supplemental 

clerk's record. The trial court is directed to cause the supplemental clerk's record to be 

filed with the Clerk of this Court within thirty days of the date of this order.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed on this

10th day of December, 2021.
#### Louis Melnick, Appellant, v. Charles Sable et al., Respondents, et al., Defendant.

Motion for leave to appeal as a poor person, denied. On the court’s own motion, appellant is granted leave to dispense with printing. The appeal will be heard on a typewritten record (including the typed minutes) and on a typewritten brief. Appellant is directed to file two copies of the record and five copies of his brief, and to serve one copy of the record and the brief on the attorneys for respondents. Nolan, P. J., Beldoek, Ughetta, Christ and Pette, JJ., concur.
### §286. Authorization of appropriations

There are hereby authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be necessary to carry out the provisions of this chapter.

(Aug. 31, 1922, ch. 301, §5, as added Pub. L. 94–319, §3, June 25, 1976, 90 Stat. 710.)
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.

SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Wayne J. Conner, Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
of Elgin National Industries, Inc., certify that:



| | 3. | This quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Elgin National Industries, Inc. fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 4. | The information contained in this quarterly report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Elgin National Industries, Inc.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/S/    WAYNE J. CONNERWayne J. ConnerVice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer




Date: May 13, 2004
### §3902. Research program on cancer in animals and birds

The Secretary of Agriculture shall conduct a program of basic research on cancer in animals and birds at appropriate facilities within the Department of Agriculture or by grants to other qualified research facilities.

(Pub. L. 96–469, §3, Oct. 17, 1980, 94 Stat. 2235.)
EXHIBIT 99.1

 

Structured Asset Trust Unit Repackagings (SATURNS) 

Series 2003-14 Trust 

To liquidate its assets and terminate

 

| CUSIP:  | 804106201 (Class A)        804106AA0 (Class B) |
|---------|------------------------------------------------|
|    |                                           |
| Symbol: | DKZ                                            |

 

 

 

 

**FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:**

February 2, 2006

 

 

NEW YORK, NEW YORK – Structured Asset Trust Unit Repackagings (SATURNS), AT&T Corp. Debenture Backed Series 2003-14 Trust (the “Trust”) (New York Stock Exchange Ticker Symbol “DKZ”), announced today that a “Trust Wind Up Event” has occurred under the terms of the Trust Agreement governing the Trust and that the Trust will liquidate its assets and terminate. Settlement of a sale of the securities held by the Trust is expected to occur on February 8, 2006, and a liquidation distribution is expected to be made with respect to the Class A and Class B Units of the Trust on February 8, 2006. 

 

The Trust Wind Up Event and requirement for termination of the Trust arose after the merger of AT&T Corp. with SBC Communications Inc. (now known as AT&T Inc.), following which AT&T Corp. became a subsidiary of AT&T Inc. Thereafter, AT&T Corp. withdrew from listing on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) certain outstanding NYSE listed bonds of AT&T Corp. which had previously given rise to reporting obligations for AT&T Corp. under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”). AT&T Corp. subsequently terminated its reporting obligations under the Exchange Act, and it is the stated intention of the parent of AT&T Corp., AT&T Inc., not to provide financial reporting information in relation to AT&T Corp. As a result, the Depositor of the Trust would be unable to meet its Exchange Act reporting obligations in relation to the Trust, which circumstance constitutes a Trust Wind Up Event.

 

Contact:

| LaSalle Bank National Association | Andy Streepey, ABS Trust Services, 312-904-9387 |
|-----------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------|