alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §2356. Regulations for practice before the Office

The Secretary shall prescribe regulations governing the admission to practice and conduct of persons representing applicants or other parties before the Plant Variety Protection Office. The Secretary may, after notice and opportunity for a hearing, suspend or exclude, either generally or in any particular case, from further practice before the Office of Plant Variety Protection any person shown to be incompetent or disreputable or guilty of gross misconduct.

(Pub. L. 91–577, title I, §26, Dec. 24, 1970, 84 Stat. 1545.)
### §964. Tier 1 participants in C–TPAT

#### (a) Benefits

The Secretary, acting through the Commissioner, shall offer limited benefits to a Tier 1 participant who has been certified in accordance with the guidelines referred to in subsection (b). Such benefits may include a reduction in the score assigned pursuant to the Automated Targeting System of not greater than 20 percent of the high-risk threshold established by the Secretary.

#### (b) Guidelines

Not later than 180 days after October 13, 2006, the Secretary, acting through the Commissioner, shall update the guidelines for certifying a C–TPAT participant's security measures and supply chain security practices under this section. Such guidelines shall include a background investigation and extensive documentation review.

#### (c) Timeframe

To the extent practicable, the Secretary, acting through the Commissioner, shall complete the Tier 1 certification process within 90 days of receipt of an application for participation in C–TPAT.

(Pub. L. 109–347, title II, §214, Oct. 13, 2006, 120 Stat. 1910.)
From: Anderson, Wes [mailto:Wes.Anderson@ee.doe.gov] 

Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2008 5:57 PM 

To: Poston, Mona; Edwards, Brenda 

Subject: Email to file of conversation with Karim Amrane

Memo to file 

From: Wes Anderson 

Ref: Noting a conversation with Karim Amrane of AHRI 

Please place this email in the file that contains all communications with the Department 

of Energy and interested parties for the rulemaking of Residential Central Air 

Conditioners and Heat Pumps and note in the docket. 

This email is to inform all interested parties that the Residential Central Air Conditioners 

and Heat Pump Team had a teleconference with Karim Amrane of the Air-Conditioning, 

Heating, and Refrigeration Institute (AHRI) on September 11, 2008. We discussed past 

events that occurred during the last Residential Central AC/HP rulemaking. We also 

requested AHRI’s assistance in collecting and aggregating shipping data and/or other 

available information that would help DOE to validate its analyses. 

Wes Anderson

Mechanical Engineer

Building Technologies Program 

Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy 

U. S. Department of Energy 

202-586-7335

 EERE-2008-BT-STD-0006 COMMENT 43
<TABLE>


EXHIBIT 11 - COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
EDISON BROTHERS STORES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
  

<CAPTION>
                                                 13 Weeks Ended

                                            May 3,            May 4,
                                             1997             1996
                                     (In thousands, except per share data)
  
<S>                                     <C>                   <C>
Loss from continuing operations         $(17,028)             $(17,674)
Preferred stock dividends                   -                     -
Net Loss applicable to common stock     $(17,028)             $(17,674)

SIMPLE AND PRIMARY
  Weighted average shares outstanding     22,202                22,135
  Net effect of dilutive stock options -
       based on the treasury method         -                     -
     TOTAL                                22,202                22,135
  
Per common share amounts: Simple
  Net Loss applicable to common stock   $   (.77)             $   ( .80)
  
Per common share amounts: Primary
  Net Loss applicable to common stock   $   (.77)             $   ( .80)
  
FULLY DILUTED
  Weighted average shares outstanding     22,202                22,135
  Net effect of dilutive stock options -
    based on the treasury method
    TOTAL                                 22,202                22,135
  
Per common share amounts: Fully Diluted
Net Loss applicable to common stock     $   (.77)             $    (.80)


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-1067
ROBERT MYERS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus SHEILA F. WINDNALL, Secretary of the Air Force, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (CA-96-1195-A) Submitted: July 22, 1998 Decided: August 5, 1998 Before ERVIN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert Myers, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Dennis Hipple, AIR FORCE LEGAL SERVICES AGENCY, Arlington, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Appellant appeals the district court’s order dismissing Appellant’s claim of retaliation under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C.A. § 2000e (West 1994). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Myers v. Windnall , No. CA-96-1195-A (E.D. Va. Nov. 10 & 13, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
### §2009h. Local involvement

An application for assistance under this subchapter shall include evidence of significant community support for the project for which the assistance is requested. In the case of assistance for a community facilities or infrastructure project, the evidence shall be in the form of a certification of support for the project from each affected general purpose local government.

(Pub. L. 87–128, title III, §381I, as added Pub. L. 104–127, title VII, §761, Apr. 4, 1996, 110 Stat. 1146.)
### §5925a. Repealed. Pub. L. 113–79, title VII, §7210, Feb. 7, 2014, 128 Stat. 885

Section, Pub. L. 101–624, title XVI, §1672A, as added Pub. L. 105–185, title II, §243, June 23, 1998, 112 Stat. 554; amended Pub. L. 107–171, title VII, §7120, May 13, 2002, 116 Stat. 434; Pub. L. 110–234, title VII, §7205, May 22, 2008, 122 Stat. 1238; Pub. L. 110–246, §4(a), title VII, §7205, June 18, 2008, 122 Stat. 1664, 1999, related to nutrient management research and extension initiative.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Study of Nutrient Banking

Pub. L. 107–171, title VII, §7411, May 13, 2002, 116 Stat. 462, provided that the Secretary of Agriculture may conduct study to evaluate nutrient banking for purpose of enhancing health and viability of watersheds in areas with large concentrations of animal producing units, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 113–79, title VII, §7408(c), Feb. 7, 2014, 128 Stat. 898.
§ 861.1 References. The following references apply to this part: ( a ) 10 U.S.C. 2640, Charter Air Transportation of Members of the Armed Forces.
( b ) Department of Defense Directive 4500.53, *Department of Defense Commercial Air Transportation Quality and Safety Review Program.*
NIIKE ROGERS 

Sun Country Slot Exemption Docket* FAA-2012-0089 

COMMITTEES 

PERMANENT SELECT COMMITTEE ON 

BTH DJSTBiCr, Mn-fiif * INTELLIGENCE 

ENERGY AND COMMERCE 

"'-~S?"^^" Congregg of tlje Winittt ^mti '^z r 

.rZ^r'sTl?! l^msit of Jveprt£ftntatibej( '^'-"r.^HXT^^r.r"'^'' 

LAN^Si°«9i5 SffilajrtjinBton, 5IBC 20515-2208 

(5171702-8000 -^ " 

(S17)7D2-a642FA)i 

(fl77)333-MIKE TOLL Fntr 

.ffffft m)>«rog«n houw nov 

January 23,2012 

The Honorable Ray LaHood 

Secretary 

Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Michel Huerta "^ 

Acting Administrator 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, SW 

Washington, DC 20591 

Re: Sun Country Airline 

I write this Letter today regarding my concerns with the recent court decision to rescind 

the Washington-Regan National slot from Sun Coimtry Airlines. 

Last year I fully supported Sun Country's effort to obtain the first connection between 

Michigan's capital city and our nation's capitol. The Department of Transportation 

(DOT) approved their application which fulfilled the specific parameters DOT sought to 

fill the slot. 

Since that time, the Lansing Airport Authority has invested over $300,000 advertising the 

route as well as making updates to their &cility. The flight has carried over 48,000 

passengers to Washington, DC and has provided $1.2 million in added revenue to the 

airport authority. 

This court ruling goes beyond the Sun Country slot. The DOT should be able to make 

these decisions based on need without interference from the courts. 

1 look forward to your prompt response on how we rectify this situation. 

Sincerely, 

1 

—. 

U 

'•.-;(._)--/ ; 

''•'.•-.— ^ 

W J 

Mike J. Rogers 

Member of Congress 

PRINTED ON HECVCLED PAPER
### SUBCHAPTER VII—MISCELLANEOUS RESEARCH PROVISIONS
**EXHIBIT 23**

 

**CONSENTOF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We hereby consent to theincorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-48030)and Forms S-8 (No. 333-117489, No. 33-53589, No. 2-94436, No. 333-57608,No. 333-57575, No. 333-46901, No. 333-41363, No. 333-65265,No. 333-41904, No. 333-37308, No. 333-70560 and No. 33-63958)of International Rectifier Corporation of our report dated September 15,2005 relating to the financial statements, financial statement schedule, management’sassessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reportingand the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, whichappears in this Form 10-K.

 

 
| /s/  PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP |   |
|---------------------------------|--------|
| PricewaterhouseCoopers  LLP     |
| Los Angeles, California         |
| September 16, 2005         |

 

1

----
STEAM ELECTRIC CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE

EPA-HQ-OW-2009-0819

DCN: SE02089A2

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT 

CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION 

(CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.
1001.301 Policy. ( a ) ( 1 ) The DTAR (48 CFR Chapter 10) is issued for Treasury implementation in accordance with the authority cited in FAR 1.301(b). The DTAR supplements the Federal Acquisition Regulation by establishing uniform policies for all acquisition activities throughout the Department of the Treasury, except for the United States Mint.
### §3002. Definitions

For purposes of this chapter, the term "direct marketing from farmers to consumers" shall mean the marketing of agricultural commodities at any marketplace (including, but not limited to, roadside stands, city markets, and vehicles used for house-to-house marketing of agricultural commodities) established and maintained for the purpose of enabling farmers to sell (either individually or through a farmers' organization directly representing the farmers who produced the commodities being sold) their agricultural commodities directly to individual consumers, or organizations representing consumers, in a manner calculated to lower the cost and increase the quality of food to such consumers while providing increased financial returns to the farmers.

(Pub. L. 94–463, §3, Oct. 8, 1976, 90 Stat. 1982.)
### §3294. Center For North American Studies

#### (a) Establishment

The Secretary of Agriculture shall establish a center, to be known as the Center For North American Studies, whose primary purpose shall be to promote better agricultural relationships among Canada, Mexico, and the United States through cooperative study, training, and research.

#### (b) Location

The Institute shall be located at an institution of higher education or at a consortium of such institutions.

#### (c) Authorization of appropriations

To carry out this section, there are authorized to be appropriated $10,000,000 for fiscal year 1994 and such sums as may necessary 1 for each of fiscal years 1995 and 1996.

(Pub. L. 102–532, §4, Oct. 27, 1992, 106 Stat. 3512.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Enterprise for the Americas Initiative Act of 1992, and not as part of the National Agricultural Research, Extension, and Teaching Policy Act of 1977 which comprises this chapter.

1 So in original. Probably should be "may be necessary".
1 

### Ngo, Dan (FAA)

From: Ralph Apel <Ralph@ReeceNichols.com>

Sent: Thursday, October 08, 2015 3:32 PM

To: Ngo, Dan (FAA)

Subject: RE: Condition 16

Mr. Ngo:

I would like to withdraw my Request for Revision of Exemption 11410.

Thank you for all your help!



# Ralph J. Apel

11901 119th Street

Overland Park, KS 66213

(913) 402-2314 (office)

(913) 579-4529 (cell)



## Rewarding Lives

http://ralph.reeceandnichols.com

Get a free MyNeighborhood Report

Licensed in Kansas and Missouri

Download my new Home Search App by clicking the link below. This is a very cool new app that works on iPhones,

Androids and iPads and is GPS based with lots and lots of information on the homes. Good when used in Kansas and

Missouri in the Kansas City Metro area.

http://App.ReeceAndNichols.com/ralph

From: Dan.Ngo@faa.gov [ mailto:Dan.Ngo@faa.gov ]

Sent: Thursday, October 08, 2015 12:59 PM

To: Ralph Apel

Subject: RE: Condition 16

Mr. Apel,

Please see Condition 16 near the top of Page 5 of your exemption (attached).2 Dan Ngo

Office of Rulemaking, Aircraft and Airport Rules Division

Federal Aviation Administration

202.267.4264

From: Ralph Apel [ mailto:Ralph@ReeceNichols.com ]

Sent: Thursday, October 08, 2015 1:56 PM

To: Ngo, Dan (FAA)

Subject: Condition 16

Mr. Ngo:

I have been looking to condition #16 to see if it covers my concerns and petition for revision of exemption 11410 but I

cannot find it. Can you please tell me where to find it in FAR?

Thanks,



# Ralph J. Apel

11901 119th Street

Overland Park, KS 66213

(913) 402-2314 (office)

(913) 579-4529 (cell)



## Rewarding Lives

http://ralph.reeceandnichols.com

Get a free MyNeighborhood Report

Licensed in Kansas and Missouri

Download my new Home Search App by clicking the link below. This is a very cool new app that works on iPhones,

Androids and iPads and is GPS based with lots and lots of information on the homes. Good when used in Kansas and

Missouri in the Kansas City Metro area.

http://App.ReeceAndNichols.com/ralph
Editorial Note on Part 724
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 724 appear at 65 FR 62616, Oct. 19, 2000.

§ 724.205 Authority for review of naval discharges; jurisdictional limitations. ( a ) The Board shall have no authority to: ( 1 ) Review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial;
( 2 ) Alter the judgment of a court-martial, except the discharge or dismissal awarded may be changed for purposes of clemency;
( 3 ) Revoke any discharge or dismissal;
( 4 ) Reinstate a person in the naval service;
( 5 ) Recall a former member to active duty;
( 6 ) Change a reenlistment code;
( 7 ) Make recommendations for reenlistment to permit entry in the naval service or any other branch of the Armed Forces;
( 8 ) Cancel or void enlistment contracts; or
( 9 ) Change the reason for discharge from or to a physical disability
( b ) Review of naval discharges shall not be undertaken in instances where the elapsed time between the date of discharge and the date of receipt of application for review exceeds fifteen years.
### §3194. Repealed. Pub. L. 104–127, title VIII, §854, Apr. 4, 1996, 110 Stat. 1172

Section, Pub. L. 95–113, title XIV, §1432, Sept. 29, 1977, 91 Stat. 1002; Pub. L. 96–88, title V, §509(b), Oct. 17, 1979, 93 Stat. 695; Pub. L. 97–98, title XIV, §1428, Dec. 22, 1981, 95 Stat. 1309; Pub. L. 99–198, title XIV, §1414(a), Dec. 23, 1985, 99 Stat. 1549; Pub. L. 101–624, title XVI, §1611(b), Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 3721; Pub. L. 102–237, title IV, §402(8), Dec. 13, 1991, 105 Stat. 1863, related to establishment of Animal Health Science Research Advisory Board.
#### Jones *vs.*The State of Georgia.

1. The conviction of one charged with a crime as principal in the second degree is contrary to law where there is no evidence of the guilt of the principal in the first degree.

2. When the judge of the superior court has approved the brief of evidence and signed the bill of exceptions, he has exhausted his powers in respect to the testimony. He cannot, by a certificate subsequently made, alter the brief of evidence as approved.

*698Criminal law. Practice in the Superior Court. Practice in the Supreme Court. Before Judge Crisp. Lee Superior Court. March Term, 1879.

Reported in the decision.

Fred H. West ; Warren *&;*Freeman, for plaintiff in error.

0. B. Hudson, solicitor-general; L>. H. Pope ; Hawkins & Hawkins, for the state.

Warner, Chief Justice.

The defendant was indicted for the offense of murder, and charged in the indictment as principal in the second degree, Jackson Sellers being charged in the same indictment as principal in the first degree. The defendant, Jones, was tried separately, and was found guilty as principal in the second degree. A motion was made for a new trial on several grounds, which was overruled, and the defendant excepted.

One of the grounds of the motion was that the verdict was contrary to law and contrary to the evidence. Upon looking through the entire evidence in the record as approved by the court on the 26th of April, 1879, it does not appear therefrom that there was any evidence of the guilt of the principal in the first degree, either by the introduction of the record of his conviction in evidence, or otherwise, upon the trial of the defendant as principal in the second degree, nor does it appear .from the evidence in the record that the principal in the first degree was guilty of the offense as charged in the indictment. The counsel for the state discovering that defect in the brief of the evidence as contained in the record here, sought to remedy it by obtaining from Judge Crisp a supplementary certificate, dated the 5th of January, 1880, in which the judge certifies that the bill of indictment against Sellers, the principal in the first degree, *699with the verdict of guilty thereon, was in evidence before the jury on the tho trial of the defendant, Jones, the principal in the second degree. When the judge signed and certified the bill of exceptions, and approved the brief of the evidence, be had exhausted the power conferred on him by law over the same, and could not, eight or nine months afterwards, when the case was pending ¿1 this court, supplement his original certificate in the manner sought to be done in this case. It not appearing from the bill of exceptions, nor from the brief of the evidence as originally signed, certified and approved by the presiding judge, and duly transmitted to this court, that there was any evidence before the jury proving the guilt of the principal in the first degree, the verdict against the principal .in the second degree was contrary to law.

Let the judgment of the court below be reversed.
Exhibit 13.2  MANAGEMENTS REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING  Management of Sasol Limited (Sasol) is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, management is required to assess the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial reporting as of the end of each fiscal year and report, based on that assessment, whether the Companys internal control over financial reporting is effective.  Sasols internal control over financial reporting is a process designed under the supervision of the President and Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer to provide reasonable assurance as to the reliability of Sasols financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.  Internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorisations of our management and directors; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorised acquisition, use or disposition of assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.  Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation.  Management assessed the effectiveness of Sasols internal control over financial reporting as of  30 June 2017. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework (2013). Based on our assessment, we believe that, as of 30 June 2017, Sasols internal control over financial reporting was effective.  PricewaterhouseCoopers Inc., an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an opinion on the effectiveness of Sasols internal control over financial reporting as stated in their report which appears herein.   Date: 28   August 2017By:
/s/ BONGANI NQWABABABongani NqwababaJoint President and Chief   Executive OfficerBy:
/s/ STEPHEN CORNELLStephen CornellJoint President and Chief   Executive OfficerDate: 28 August 2017By:
/s/ PAUL VICTORPaul VictorChief Financial Officer
### §1766. Rules and regulations; advance payment for rent and other service; funds for courtesies to foreign representatives

The Secretary of Agriculture may make rules and regulations necessary to carry out the purposes of this chapter and may cooperate with any Department or agency of the United States Government, State, Territory, or possession or any organization or person. In any foreign country where custom or practice requires payment in advance for rent or other service, such payment may be authorized by the Secretary of Agriculture. Funds available for the purposes of this chapter may be used for extending courtesies to representatives of foreign countries, when so provided in appropriation or other law.

(Aug. 28, 1954, ch. 1041, title VI, §606A, formerly §606, 68 Stat. 909; amended Aug. 3, 1956, ch. 950, §8, 70 Stat. 1034; renumbered §606A, Pub. L. 95–501, title IV, §401(2), Oct. 21, 1978, 92 Stat. 1690.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1956—Act Aug. 3, 1956, inserted sentence relating to availability of funds for extending courtesies to representatives of foreign countries.
### SUBCHAPTER XI—AQUACULTURE
§ 776.48 Advocate in nonadjudicative proceedings. ( a ) A covered attorney representing a client before a legislative or administrative tribunal in a nonadjudicative proceeding shall disclose that the appearance is in a representative capacity and shall conform to the provisions of §§ 776.42 (a) through (d), 776.43, and 776.44 of this part.
( b ) [Reserved]
#### § 200.1530 Settlement.

The DHA has exclusive authority to settle any issues or case without consent of the ALJ.
§ 631.1 Purpose. This part prescribes uniform policies and procedures for the establishment, and operation of the following: ( a ) Armed Forces Disciplinary Control Boards (AFDCB).
( b ) Off-installation liaison and operations.