alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §§2009ee to 2009ee–3. Repealed. Pub. L. 110–234, title VI, §6002(b), May 22, 2008, 122 Stat. 1162, and Pub. L. 110–246, §4(a), title VI, §6002(b), June 18, 2008, 122 Stat. 1664, 1923

Section 2009ee, Pub. L. 107–171, title VI, §6301, May 13, 2002, 116 Stat. 421, defined terms.

Section 2009ee–1, Pub. L. 107–171, title VI, §6302, May 13, 2002, 116 Stat. 422, related to SEARCH grant program. See section 1926 of this title.

Section 2009ee–2, Pub. L. 107–171, title VI, §6303, May 13, 2002, 116 Stat. 424, related to annual report on projects.

Section 2009ee–3, Pub. L. 107–171, title VI, §6304, May 13, 2002, 116 Stat. 424, related to funding.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Pub. L. 110–234 and Pub. L. 110–246 repealed this subchapter. Pub. L. 110–234 was repealed by section 4(a) of Pub. L. 110–246.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal of this subchapter and repeal of Pub. L. 110–234 by Pub. L. 110–246 effective May 22, 2008, the date of enactment of Pub. L. 110–234, see section 4 of Pub. L. 110–246, set out as an Effective Date note under section 8701 of this title.
#### § 935.93 Delivery of summons to plaintiff.

The Clerk of the Court shall promptly provide a copy of the summons to the plaintiff, together with notice that if the plaintiff fails to appear at the Court at the time set for the trial, the case will be dismissed. The trial shall be set at a date that will allow each party at least 7 days, after the pleadings are closed, to prepare.
### §5311a. Joint nutrition monitoring and related research activities

The Secretary and the Secretary of Health and Human Services shall continue to provide jointly for national nutrition monitoring and related research activities carried out as of the date of enactment of this Act—

(1) to collect continuous dietary, health, physical activity, and diet and health knowledge data on a nationally representative sample;

(2) to periodically collect data on special at-risk populations, as identified by the Secretaries;

(3) to distribute information on health, nutrition, the environment, and physical activity to the public in a timely fashion;

(4) to analyze new data that becomes available;

(5) to continuously update food composition tables; and

(6) to research and develop data collection methods and standards.

(Pub. L. 110–234, title IV, §4403, May 22, 2008, 122 Stat. 1137; Pub. L. 110–246, §4(a), title IV, §4403, June 18, 2008, 122 Stat. 1664, 1898.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The date of enactment of this Act, referred to in text, is the date of enactment of Pub. L. 110–246, which was approved June 18, 2008.

#### Codification

Pub. L. 110–234 and Pub. L. 110–246 enacted identical sections. Pub. L. 110–234 was repealed by section 4(a) of Pub. L. 110–246.

Section was enacted as part of the Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008, and not as part of the National Nutrition Monitoring and Related Research Act of 1990 which comprises this chapter.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Enactment of this section and repeal of Pub. L. 110–234 by Pub. L. 110–246 effective May 22, 2008, the date of enactment of Pub. L. 110–234, except as otherwise provided, see section 4 of Pub. L. 110–246, set out as a note under section 8701 of this title.

Section effective Oct. 1, 2008, see section 4407 of Pub. L. 110–246, set out as an Effective Date of 2008 Amendment note under section 1161 of Title 2, The Congress.

#### Definition of "Secretary"

"Secretary" as meaning the Secretary of Agriculture, see section 8701 of this title.
#### 1202.7000 General.

The following abbreviations or acronyms may be used throughout the TAR and the agency's associated internal policies and procedures in the TAM—

| CFO | Chief Financial Officer. |
| --- | --- |
| CIO | Chief Information Officer. |
| COCO | Chief of the Contracting Office. |
| COR | Contracting Officer's Representative. |
| D&F | Determination and Findings. |
| FOIA | Freedom of Information Act. |
| HCA | Head of the Contracting Activity. |
| HOA | Head of the Operating Administration. |
| J&A | Justification and Approval. |
| OA | Operating Administration. |
| OIG | Office of the Inspector General. |
| OSDBU | Office of Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization. |
| PCR | Procurement Center Representative. |
| RFP | Request for Proposal. |
| SBA | Small Business Administration. |
| SBS | Small Business Specialist. |
| SPE | Senior Procurement Executive. |

Table 1 to 1202.7000—Abbreviations and Acronyms
```

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 237 (Friday, December 10, 2010)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 76930]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: C1-2010-29994]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

17 CFR Part 43

RIN 3038-AD08

Real-Time Public Reporting of Swap Transaction Data

Correction

    In proposed rule document 2010-29994 beginning on page 76140 in the 
issue of Tuesday, December 7, 2010, make the following correction:

Appendix A to Part 43 [Corrected]

    On pages 76181 and 76182, in Appendix A to Part 43, in Table A2, 
the table heading should read ``Table A2--Additional Real-Time Public 
Reporting Data Fields for Options, Swaptions and Swaps with Embedded 
Options.''

[FR Doc. C1-2010-29994 Filed 12-9-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6.1.1

Eastern Division

Henry Espejo, et al.

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:11−cv−08987

Honorable Charles P. Kocoras

Santander Consumer USA, Inc.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Wednesday, June 8, 2016:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Charles P. Kocoras: Pursuant to Parties'

stipulation to extend briefing schedule [189]; Responses in opposition are due by

6/13/2016; Replies in support are due by 7/8/2016. Mailed notice(vcf, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:11-cv-08987 Document #: 190 Filed: 06/08/16 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:2524
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

April 28, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 131670(71) Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, TIMOTHY JORDAN, Personal Justices 

Representative of the Estate of

Sandra Jordan, Deceased,

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 131670 

 COA: 259224 

Monroe CC: 04-017775-NH 

MERCY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, 

DAVID EUGENE SZYMANSKI, 

M.D., and SYED HASSAN, M.D., 

 Defendants-Appellees. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s December 14, 

2007 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was 

entered erroneously. 

d0421 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

April 28, 2008 

 Clerk
§ 634.49 Standards for impoundment. ( a ) POVs should not be impounded unless the vehicles clearly interfere with ongoing operations or movement of traffic, threaten public safety or convenience, are involved in criminal activity, contain evidence of criminal activity, or are stolen or abandoned.
( b ) The impoundment of a POV would be inappropriate when reasonable alternatives to impoundment exist. ( 1 ) Attempts should be made to locate the owner of the POV and have the vehicle removed.
( 2 ) The vehicle may be moved a short distance to a legal parking area and temporarily secured until the owner is found.
( 3 ) Another responsible person may be allowed to drive or tow the POV with permission from the owner, operator, or person empowered to control the vehicle. In this case, the owner, operator, or person empowered to control the vehicle will be informed that law enforcement personnel are not responsible for safeguarding the POV.
( c ) Impounding of POVs is justified when any of the following conditions exist: ( 1 ) The POV is illegally parked— ( i ) On a street or bridge, in a tunnel, or is double parked, and interferes with the orderly flow of traffic.
( ii ) On a sidewalk, within an intersection, on a cross-walk, on a railroad track, in a fire lane, or is blocking a driveway, so that the vehicle interferes with operations or creates a safety hazard to other roadway users or the general public. An example would be a vehicle parked within 15 feet of a fire hydrant or blocking a properly marked driveway of a fire station or aircraft-alert crew facility.
( iii ) When blocking an emergency exit door of any public place (installation theater, club, dining hall, hospital, and other facility).
( iv ) In a “tow-away” zone that is so marked with proper signs.
( 2 ) The POV interferes with— ( i ) Street cleaning or snow removal operations and attempts to contact the owner have been unsuccessful.
( ii ) Emergency operations during a natural disaster or fire or must be removed from the disaster area during cleanup operations.
( 3 ) The POV has been used in a crime or contains evidence of criminal activity.
( 4 ) The owner or person in charge has been apprehended and is unable or unwilling to arrange for custody or removal.
( 5 ) The POV is mechanically defective and is a menace to others using the public roadways.
( 6 ) The POV is disabled by a traffic incident and the operator is either unavailable or physically incapable of having the vehicle towed to a place of safety for storage or safekeeping.
( 7 ) Law enforcement personnel reasonably believe the vehicle is abandoned.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Esterline Technologies Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended January 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-Q), I, Robert W. Cremin,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)      The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)      The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.





|                     |  |     |  |                                                
|-------------------- |  | --- |  | -----------------------------------------------
|Dated: March 5, 2009 |  | By: |  | /s/
Robert W. Cremin                           
|                     |  |     |  | Robert W. Cremin                               
|                     |  |     |  | Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
#### ERNESTINE RICHARDSON; MERLE RICHARDSON v. McCRACKEN ENTERPRISES, d/b/a McCRACKEN OIL COMPANY, A NORTH CAROLINA CORPORATION

No. 341A97

(Filed 6 March 1998)

Appeal by plaintiffs pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 126 N.C. App. 506, 485 S.E.2d 844 (1997), affirming an order entered by Stephens (Donald W.), J., on 16 May 1996 in Superior Court, Franklin County, granting summary judgment to defendant. Heard in the Supreme Court 11 February 1998.

*Steven E. Hight, Attorney, P.A., by Steven E. Hight and Steven H. McFarlane, for plaintiff-appellants.*

*Hatch, Little & Bunn, L.L.P., by A. Bartlett White, Harold W. Berry, and Tina L. Frazier, for defendant-appellee.*

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.
### §6013. Authorization of appropriations

#### (a) In general

There are authorized to be appropriated for each fiscal year such sums as are necessary to carry out this chapter.

#### (b) Administrative expenses

Funds appropriated to carry out this chapter shall not be available for payment of the expenses or expenditures of the Board in administering any provision of any plan issued under this chapter.

(Pub. L. 101–624, title XIX, §1918, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 3854.)
<PAGE>



                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.1


                               HCC INDUSTRIES INC.
                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                                 (IN THOUSANDS)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                                    FOR THE YEAR ENDED
                                                                     ------------------------------------------------
                                                                      APRIL 3,          MARCH 28,         MARCH 29,
                                                                       1999                1998              1997
                                                                     ---------        -----------        ----------
<S>                                                                    <C>               <C>                <C>
Earnings:

     Earnings before taxes and extraordinary item                    $   8,692        $     6,020        $     (821)
     Add:  Fixed charges(1)                                             11,190             10,327             2,946
                                                                     ---------        -----------        ----------

                                                                     $  19,882        $    16,347        $    2,125
                                                                     =========        ===========        ==========
Fixed Charges: (1)

     Interest expense                                                $  11,190        $    10,327        $    2,946
                                                                     =========        ===========        ==========
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges                                         1.8                1.6                --(2)
                                                                     =========        ===========        ==========
</TABLE>


(1)  The ratios of earnings to fixed charges were computed by adding earnings
     before income taxes and extraordinary item to fixed charges and dividing
     by fixed charges. Fixed charges consist of interest expense and
     amortization of debt issuance costs.

(2)  The Company's earnings were insufficient to cover fixed charges for the
     fiscal year ended March 29, 1997. The dollar amount of the deficiency was
     $821,000.



                                        52
#### In the Matter of Hyman Kahan, Appellant, v. Robert C. Weaver, as State Rent Administrator, Respondent.

Motion by appellant for reargument and for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals referred to the court that rendered the decision. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Kleinfeld, Christ and Pette, JJ., concur. Motion for reargument denied, with $10 costs. Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Ughetta, Kleinfeld and Christ, JJ., concur.
### §2204b–4. Institute for Rural Partnerships

For an additional amount for the Office of the Secretary, $30,000,000, to remain available until expended, to establish an Institute for Rural Partnerships: Provided, That the Secretary shall establish a grant program and distribute the funds to three geographically diverse established land-grant universities: Provided further, That the Institute for Rural Partnerships shall dedicate resources to researching the causes and conditions of challenges facing rural areas, and develop community partnerships to address such challenges: Provided further, That administrative or other fees shall not exceed one percent: Provided further, That such partnership shall coordinate and publish an annual report.

(Pub. L. 117–103, div. A, title VII, §778, Mar. 15, 2022, 136 Stat. 99.)
### §5338. Regulations

The Office of Personnel Management may prescribe regulations necessary for the administration of this subchapter.

(Pub. L. 89–554, Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 470; Pub. L. 95–454, title IX, §906(a)(2), Oct. 13, 1978, 92 Stat. 1224.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

The section is added on authority of former sections 1072 and 1072a, which are carried into section 5115.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1978—Pub. L. 95–454 substituted "Office of Personnel Management" for "Civil Service Commission".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1978 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 95–454 effective 90 days after Oct. 13, 1978, see section 907 of Pub. L. 95–454, set out as a note under section 1101 of this title.
**EXHIBIT
12.2**
 **CERTIFICATION**
  I, David
Wolfin, President of Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd., certify
that:
  
 1.  I have
reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd.;
 
 2.
    Based
      on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
      material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
      statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
      were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
      report;
 
 3.
    Based
      on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
      included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
      financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company
      as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
 
 4.
    The
      Company's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
      establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
      defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and
      have:
 
 (a)
    Designed
      such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
      controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
      that material information relating to the Company, including its
      consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
      prepared;
 
 (b)
    Omitted;
 
 (c)
    Evaluated
      the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures and
      presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
      disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by
      this report based on such evaluation; and
 
 (d)
    Disclosed
      in this report any change in the Company's internal control over financial
      reporting that occurred during the Company's most recent annual report
      that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
      affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting; and
 
 5.
    The
      Company's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our
      most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
      the Company's auditors and the audit committee of the Company's board of
      directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 
 (a)
    All
      significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
      operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
      reasonably likely to adversely affect the Company's ability to record,
      process, summarize and report financial information; and
 
 (b)
    Any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the Company's internal control
      over financial reporting.
 
 Dated:
August 12, 2005      */s/
David Wolfin* ________
 David
Wolfin, President
 (Principal
Financial Officer)
  63
§ 37.635 What cost principles do I require a nonprofit participant to use? So as not to force financial system changes for any nonprofit participant, your expenditure-based TIA will provide that costs to be charged to the research project by any nonprofit participant must be determined to be allowable in accordance with: ( a ) Subpart E of OMB guidance in 2 CFR part 200, if the participant is a State, local government, Indian tribe, institution of higher education, or nonprofit organization. In conformance with 2 CFR 200.401(c) of that OMB guidance, a nonprofit organization listed in appendix VIII to 2 CFR part 200 is subject to the cost principles in the Federal Acquisition Regulation (48 CFR subpart 31.2) and Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (48 CFR subpart 231.2).
( b ) The cost principles identified in appendix IX to the OMB guidance in 2 CFR part 200 (see 45 CFR part 75), if the participant is a hospital.
[85 FR 51245, Aug. 19, 2020]
Order entered January 29, 2020

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-01266-CV

LANCESHA NORMAN, Appellant

V.

NP COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT D/B/A HEROES HOUSE, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-19-05981-E

ORDER

By order dated January 3, 2020, we ordered appellant to provide, by January 21st, written 

verification that she has requested preparation of the reporter’s record and cautioned her that 

failure to comply may result in an order that the appeal be submitted without the reporter’s 

record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(c). As of today’s date, appellant has not responded. 

Accordingly, we order this appeal be submitted without the reporter’s record. See id.

Appellant shall file her brief on the merits WITHIN THIRTY DAYS of the date of this 

order.

/s/ BILL WHITEHILL

JUSTICE
Appeal No. 75-29.

#### Augusto Ambrosino *v.*Rhode Island Personnel Appeal Board *et al.*

Plaintiff is ordered to Show Cause why the appeal in the above-entitled matter should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. *Savings Bank of Newport*v. *Hawksley,*103 R. I. 741, 241 A.2d 806 (1968); *Clark*v. *Fascio*106 R. I. 751, 264 A.2d 317 (1970). Plaintiff has twenty days from the date'of this order to submit a memorandum in support *933of. his . appeal.

*Giovanni Folcarelli,*for plaintiff. *Julius C. Michaelson,*Attorney General, for defendants.
#### Kenneth O. Blair et al., Respondents-Appellants, v. State of New York, Appellant-Respondent.

(Claim No. 38538.)

—Cross appeal from a judgment entered on a decision rendered after trial in the Court of Claims. A substantial part of the award of $8,000 made in favor of the claimants by the Court of Claims in connection with this appropriation claim is for indirect damages. The question of land taken was very small, .006 of one acre. The claimants’ proof of value of the land taken with $1,500. State’s proof of value was $100. The part of the award for indirect damage, which is not segregated in the decision, therefore, was at least $6,500. We are of opinion an award for indirect damage is not warranted on this record. There was no change in grade in access to claimants’ property effected by the public improvement. Damages resulting from circuity of access are not recoverable. *(Selig*v. *State of New York,*10 H Y 2d 34.) Hor are the damages recoverable based on a difference in the view from the premises caused by the rearrangement in the nearby terrain in carrying out the public improvement. Judgment modified on the law and the facts by reducing the amount awarded to $1,500; and as thus modified, affirmed, without costs. Bergan, P. J., Gibson, Reynolds and Taylor, JJ., concur.