alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
                   

<MULTIPLIER>                    1,000

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               AUG-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                  SEP-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                    FEB-28-1999
<CASH>                            71  
<SECURITIES>                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                    653               
<ALLOWANCES>                    (219)              
<INVENTORY>                       971               
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                1,534               
<PP&E>                          5,262               
<DEPRECIATION>                 (4,668)               
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  2,245               
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           2,081               
<BONDS>                             0           
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>               0           
<PREFERRED>                         0           
<COMMON>                          639             
<OTHER-SE>                     (2,956)               
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    2,245             
<SALES>                         1,868              
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                1,868              
<CGS>                           1,504             
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   2,470              
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                 (353)         
<LOSS-PROVISION>                    0          
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>               (173)         
<INCOME-PRETAX>                (1,127)            
<INCOME-TAX>                        0         
<INCOME-CONTINUING>            (1,127)              
<DISCONTINUED>                      0          
<EXTRAORDINARY>                     0          
<CHANGES>                           0          
<NET-INCOME>                   (1,127)            
<EPS-PRIMARY>                   (0.18)            
<EPS-DILUTED>                   (0.18)             
        




</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of TeraForce Technology Corporation (the
"COMPANY") on Form 10-K for the annual period ended December 31, 2002, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "REPORT"),
I, Herman M. Frietsch, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/ Herman M. Frietsch
---------------------------
Herman M. Frietsch
Chief Executive Officer

Dated: April 15, 2003
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 566 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 566

To withdraw certain land in Okanogan County, Washington, to protect the 
                     land, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 8, 2017

  Ms. Cantwell (for herself and Mrs. Murray) introduced the following 
bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To withdraw certain land in Okanogan County, Washington, to protect the 
                     land, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Methow Headwaters Protection Act''.

SEC. 2. METHOW VALLEY, WASHINGTON, FEDERAL LAND WITHDRAWAL.

    (a) Definition of Map.--In this Act, the term ``Map'' means the 
Forest Service map entitled ``Methow Headwaters Withdrawal Proposal 
Legislative Map'' and dated May 24, 2016.
    (b) Withdrawal.--Subject to valid existing rights, the 
approximately 340,079 acres of Federal land and interests in the land 
located in the Okanogan-Wenatchee National Forest within the area 
depicted on the Map as ``Proposed Withdrawal'' is withdrawn from all 
forms of--
            (1) entry, appropriation, or disposal under the public land 
        laws;
            (2) location, entry, and patent under the mining laws; and
            (3) disposition under the mineral leasing and geothermal 
        leasing laws.
    (c) Acquired Land.--Any land or interest in land within the area 
depicted on the Map as ``Proposed Withdrawal'' that is acquired by the 
United States after the date of enactment of this Act shall, on 
acquisition, be immediately withdrawn in accordance with this section.
    (d) Availability of Map.--The Map shall be kept on file and made 
available for public inspection in the appropriate offices of the 
Forest Service and the Bureau of Land Management.
                                 <all>
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

_________________________________ )

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

)

v. ) Civil Action No. 13

- CR

- 0244 (KBJ)

)

WESLEY HAWKINS, )

)

Defendant

. )

_________________________________ )

ORDER

In a hea ring before Ma gistrate Judge John M. Facciola on September 5, 2013,

Defendant Wesley Hawkins entered a plea of guilty. On that date, the ma gistrate judge issued

a Report and Re com m endation advising the Court to accept D efendant ’ s plea. The Court has

received no objection to the Report and Recommendation. See L CrR 59.2(b) ( “ Any party may

file for con sideration by the district judge written obj ections to the magistrate judge ’ s proposed

findings and recommendations . . . within fourteen (14) days after being served with a copy

thereof. ” ) Accordingly, the Courts hereb y ADOPTS the recommendation of the magistrate

judge and accepts D efendant ’ s guilty plea.

In addition, a sentencing hearing for Defendant is currently scheduled for

November 21, 2013. The Court hereby ORDERS that any memoranda in aid of

sentencing shall be filed by November 7, 2013, and any responses by November 14,

2013.

SO ORDERED.



# Ketanji Brown Jackson

KETANJI BROWN JACKSON

United States District Judge

DATE: October 3 , 2013
**Z: \**  **data \**  **SIP \**  **Connecticut \**  **8 hour Ozone Redesignation \**  **MARMA 2007 Appendices**

Name Size Type Last Modified marama_2007_appendices.zip 2,034KB WinZip File 1/10/2013 10:57 AM Appendix A CAMD to NIF Crosswalk Aug12_2010.xls 1,344KB Microsoft Office Excel 97 -2003 Worksheet 2/8/2012 10:44 AM Appendix B Technical Memorandum - EFs for CPM from EGUs.doc 302KB Microsoft Office Word 97 - 2003 Document 2/8/2012 10:44 AM Appendix C SCC_Control_Device_PM_Ratios.xls 574KB Microsoft Office Excel 97 -2003 Worksheet 2/8/2012 10:44 AM Appendix D Stack_SCC_Defaults.xls 428KB Microsoft Office Excel 97 -2003 Worksheet 2/8/2012 10:44 AM Appendix E VDEQ Conceptual Description for DG draft March 15, 2010.doc 1,579KB Microsoft Office Word 97 - 2003 Document 2/8/2012 10: 44 AM Appendix F NESCAUM 2007 2020 MOVES modeling 20111209 PM.doc 924KB Microsoft Office Word 97 - 2003 Document 2/8/2012 10:44 AM Appendix G Stage_II_Controls.xlsx 38KB Microsoft Office Excel Worksheet 2/8/2012 10:44 AM Appendix H MANEVU_VA SMOKE QA Memo 17Dec2010.doc 1,041KB Microsoft Office Word 97 - 2003 Document 2/8/2012 10:44 AM
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 14

- 00893

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF M.C. and T.C.

From the 288th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014

- PA

- 00142

Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Associate Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ANGELINI

, JUSTICE MARTINEZ , AND JUSTICE ALVAREZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s order terminating

appellant’s parental rights is AFFIRMED. No costs of appeal are assessed against appellant

.

SIGNED June 10, 2015.

_____________________________ Karen Angelini, Justice
§ 770.58 Violations. ( a ) Any person entering or remaining on Portsmouth Naval Shipyard without the consent of the Commander, Portsmouth Naval Shipyard, or his authorized representative, shall be subject to the penalties prescribed in 18 U.S.C. 1382, which provides in pertinent part: Whoever, within the jurisdiction of the United States, goes upon any military, naval . . . reservation, post, fort, arsenal, yard, station, or installation, for any purpose prohibited by law or lawful regulation . . . Shall be fined not more than $500 or imprisoned not more than six months, or both.
( b ) Moreover, any person who willfully violates this instruction is subject to a fine not to exceed $5000 or imprisonment for not more than one (1) year, or both, as provided by 50 U.S.C. 797.
COVID-19 Guidance for Retail Workers

OSHA is committed to protecting the health and safety of America’s workers and workplaces during 

these unprecedented times. The agency will be issuing a series of industry-specific alerts designed to 

help employers keep workers safe.

If you are an employer in the retail industry (e.g., pharmacies, supermarkets, and big box stores), the 

following tips can help reduce your employees’ risk of exposure to the coronavirus:

 Encourage workers to stay home if they are sick. 

 Provide a place to wash hands or alcohol-based hand rubs containing at least 60% alcohol.

 Maintain regular housekeeping practices, including routine cleaning and disinfecting of surfaces 

and equipment with Environmental Protection Agency-approved cleaning chemicals from List N

or that have label claims against the coronavirus.

 Practice sensible social distancing, maintaining six feet between co-workers and customers, 

where possible. For example, some worksites have already begun to demarcate six-foot distances 

with floor tape in checkout lines. Workplaces where social distancing is a challenge should 

consider innovative approaches, such as opening only every other cash register, temporarily 

moving workstations to create more distance, and installing plexiglass partitions. 

 Use a drive-through window or curbside pick-up.

 Provide workers and customers with tissues and trash receptacles.

 Train workers in proper hygiene practices and the use of workplace controls.

 Allow workers to wear masks over their nose and mouth to prevent them from spreading the virus. 

 Encourage workers to report any safety and health concerns.

For more information, visit www.osha.gov/coronavirus or call 1-800-321-OSHA (6742).

OSHA issues alerts to draw attention to 

worker safety and health issues and solutions.

 • osha.gov/coronavirus • 1-800-321-OSHA (6742) • @OSHA_DOL

OSHA 3996-04 2020
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-2441

FABIAN CANSECO VASQUEZ,

Petitioner,

v.

JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.

Submitted: July 20, 2017 Decided: July 31, 2017

Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jonathan S. Greene, GREENE LAW FIRM, LLC, Columbia, Maryland, for Petitioner. 

Chad A. Readler, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Shelley R. Goad, Assistant 

Director, Julia J. Tyler, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Fabian Canseco Vasquez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of 

an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) dismissing his appeal from the IJ’s 

decision denying his applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection 

under the Convention Against Torture (CAT). For the reasons set forth below, we deny

the petition for review.

The agency’s decision regarding whether an applicant has complied with the oneyear time limit for filing an asylum application or established changed or extraordinary 

circumstances justifying waiver of that time limit is not reviewable by any court. 8 

U.S.C. § 1158(a)(3) (2012); see also Mulyani v. Holder, 771 F.3d 190, 196-97 (4th Cir. 

2014); Gomis v. Holder, 571 F.3d 353, 358-59 (4th Cir. 2009). Although 8 U.S.C. 

§ 1252(a)(2)(D) (2012) provides that any provision under the Immigration and 

Nationality Act which limits or eliminates judicial review shall not be construed as 

precluding review of constitutional claims or questions of law, we have held that the 

question of whether an asylum application is untimely or whether the changed or 

extraordinary circumstances exception applies “is a discretionary determination based on 

factual circumstances.” Gomis, 571 F.3d at 358. We have reviewed the record and 

Vasquez’s brief and conclude that he fails to raise a colorable constitutional claim or 

question of law. Thus, we lack jurisdiction to review the Board’s finding that Vasquez’s 

asylum application was untimely. We further conclude that the Board’s denial of 

Vasquez’s applications for withholding of removal and protection under the CAT is 
3

supported by substantial evidence and the record does not compel a different result. Id. 

at 359; Gandziami-Mickhou v. Gonzales, 445 F.3d 351, 354 (4th Cir. 2006). 

Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
### §10204. Rate of pay for original appointments

(a) In General.—Except as provided in subsection (b), all original appointments shall be made at the minimum rate of basic pay for the Officer rank set forth in the schedule in section 10203.

(b) Exception for Superior Qualifications or Special Need.—The Director of the United States Secret Service or the designee of the Director may appoint an individual at a rate above the minimum rate of basic pay for the Officer rank based on the individual's superior qualifications or a special need of the Government for the individual's services.

(Added Pub. L. 111–282, §2(a), Oct. 15, 2010, 124 Stat. 3036.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective on first day of first pay period which begins after Oct. 15, 2010, see section 5 of Pub. L. 111–282, set out as an Effective Date of 2010 Amendment note under section 5102 of this title.
### §1992. Loan limitations

No loan (other than one to a public body or nonprofit association (including Indian tribes on Federal and State reservations or other federally recognized Indian tribal groups) for community facilities or one of a type authorized by section 1926(a)(1) of this title prior to its amendment by the Rural Development Act of 1972) shall be made by the Secretary either for sale as an insured loan or otherwise under sections 1926(a)(1), 1932, or 1942(c) of this title unless the Secretary shall have determined that no other lender is willing to make such loan and assume 10 per centum of any loss sustained thereon. No contract guaranteeing any such loan by such other lender shall require the Secretary to guarantee more than 90 per centum of the principal and interest on such loan.

(Pub. L. 87–128, title III, §344, as added Pub. L. 92–419, title I, §129, Aug. 30, 1972, 86 Stat. 666; amended Pub. L. 94–35, §2, June 16, 1975, 89 Stat. 214; Pub. L. 104–127, title VI, §661(i), Apr. 4, 1996, 110 Stat. 1107.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

For statutory changes to section 1926(a)(1) of this title by the Rural Development Act of 1972, referred to in text, see 1972 Amendment note for section 104 of Pub. L. 92–419, set out under section 1926 of this title. For complete classification of Rural Development Act of 1972 to the Code, see Short Title of 1972 Amendment note set out under section 1921 of this title and Tables.

#### Amendments

1996—Pub. L. 104–127 substituted "1926(a)(1), 1932, or 1942(c) of this title" for "1924(b), 1926(a)(1), 1932, 1942(b), or 1942(c) of this title".

1975—Pub. L. 94–35 substituted "guaranteed more than 90 per centum of the principal and interest on such loan" for "participate in more than 90 per centum of any loss sustained thereon".
MEMORANDUM

TO: The General Counsel 

FROM: The Secretary 

SUBJECT: Delegation of Authority

I. DELEGATION

Under the authority vested in me by section 412 of the Department of Education

Organization Act (Pub. L. No. 86-99, 20 U.S.C. § 3472), I hereby delegate to you, to

your successor in function, and to anyone serving for you in an acting capacity or

delegated the authority to perform the functions and duties of your position, the authority

to request from the Federal Labor Relations Authority a General Statement of Policy or

Guidance pursuant to 5 C.F.R. § 2427.2(a).

Unless otherwise specified in future delegations of authority, amendments to the authority

delegated herein are included within the scope of the delegation.

II. RESERVATIONS

This delegation is not applicable to any other labor relations authority other than the

authority articulated in 5 C.F.R. Part 2427.

III. REDELEGATION

This authority may be redelegated.

IV. CERTIFICATION AND EFFECTIVE DATE

This delegation is effective upon certification by the Department’s Principal Delegation

Control Officer.

/s

Betsy DeVos

OGC Concurrence and Date:____Michael Taylor, 8/29/2019_______________________
### §2718. Authorization of appropriations

There is hereby authorized to be appropriated out of any money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated such funds as are necessary to carry out the provisions of this chapter. The funds so appropriated shall not be available for payment of the expenses or expenditures of the Egg Board in administering any provisions of any order issued pursuant to the terms of this chapter.

(Pub. L. 93–428, §20, Oct. 1, 1974, 88 Stat. 1179.)
#### (A) Max Kushner v. Martin Rarback, as Secretary-Treasurer, et al. (B) Julia Koi v. P. S. *&*M. Catering Corp.

Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, Eager, Steuer and Bergan, JJ. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Valente, McNally and Eager, JJ. [In each action] Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied, with $10 costs.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated condensed balance sheets and consolidated condensed statements of
income and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998 
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          48,542
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  482,642
<ALLOWANCES>                                    21,319
<INVENTORY>                                    552,609
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,177,276
<PP&E>                                         900,616
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0<F1>
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,924,220
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          635,018
<BONDS>                                        647,052
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       103,461
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,420,049
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,924,220
<SALES>                                        978,927
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,586,747
<CGS>                                          675,442
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,078,704
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              40,482
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                140,829
<INCOME-TAX>                                    51,823
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             89,006
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    89,006
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.92
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.91
<FN>
<F1>This amount is not disclosed in the financial statements and thus a value of
zero has been shown for purposes of this financial data schedule.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 168 

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Select Committee on the Strategic 

Competition Between the United States and the Chinese Communist 

Party in the One Hundred Eighteenth Congress. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 27, 2023 

Mr. GALLAGHER submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on House Administration 

RESOLUTION 

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Select Committee 

on the Strategic Competition Between the United States 

and the Chinese Communist Party in the One Hundred 

Eighteenth Congress. 

1 Resolved, 

2 SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES. 

3 For the expenses of the Select Committee on the 

4 Strategic Competition Between the United States and the 

5 Chinese Communist Party (hereafter in this resolution re6 ferred to as the ‘‘Committee’’), including the expenses of 

7 all staff salaries, there shall be paid, out of the applicable 

8 accounts of the House of Representatives for committee 


SSpencer on DSK126QN23PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 168 IH 

1 salaries and expenses, not more than $8,892,625 for the 

2 One Hundred Eighteenth Congress. 

3 SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS. 

4 Of the amount specified in section 1— 

5 (1) not more than $4,470,816 shall be available 

6 for expenses incurred during the period beginning at 

7 noon on January 3, 2023, and ending immediately 

8 before noon on January 3, 2024; and 

9 (2) not more than $4,421,809 shall be available 

10 for expenses incurred during the period beginning at 

11 noon on January 3, 2024, and ending immediately 

12 before noon on January 3, 2025. 

13 SEC. 3. VOUCHERS. 

14 Payments under this resolution shall be made on 

15 vouchers authorized by the Committee, signed by the 

16 Chairman of the Committee, and approved in the manner 

17 directed by the Committee on House Administration. 

18 SEC. 4. REGULATIONS. 

19 Amounts made available under this resolution shall 

20 be expended in accordance with regulations prescribed by 

21 the Committee on House Administration. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK126QN23PROD with BILLS