alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §453. Use of appropriated funds

#### (a) Disposal of property

#### (1) Strict compliance

If specifically authorized to dispose of real property in this chapter or any other Act, the Secretary shall exercise this authority in strict compliance with subchapter IV of chapter 5 of title 40.

#### (2) Deposit of proceeds

The Secretary shall deposit the proceeds of any exercise of property disposal authority into the miscellaneous receipts of the Treasury in accordance with section 3302(b) of title 31.

#### (b) Gifts

Except as authorized by section 2601 of title 10, by section 93 1 of title 14, or by section 321n or 464 of this title, gifts or donations of services or property of or for the Department may not be accepted, used, or disposed of unless specifically permitted in advance in an appropriations Act and only under the conditions and for the purposes specified in such appropriations Act.

#### (c) Budget request

Under section 1105 of title 31, the President shall submit to Congress a detailed budget request for the Department for fiscal year 2004, and for each subsequent fiscal year.

(Pub. L. 107–296, title VIII, §873, Nov. 25, 2002, 116 Stat. 2243; Pub. L. 108–7, div. L, §103(3), Feb. 20, 2003, 117 Stat. 529; Pub. L. 111–245, §2(a)(2), Sept. 30, 2010, 124 Stat. 2621.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in subsec. (a)(1), was in the original a reference to this Act, meaning Pub. L. 107–296, Nov. 25, 2002, 116 Stat. 2135, known as the Homeland Security Act of 2002, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 101 of this title and Tables.

Section 93 of title 14, referred to in subsec. (b), was redesignated section 504 of title 14 by Pub. L. 115–282, title I, §105(b), Dec. 4, 2018, 132 Stat. 4200, and references to section 93 of title 14 deemed to refer to such redesignated section, see section 123(b)(1) of Pub. L. 115–282, set out as a References to Sections of Title 14 as Redesignated by Pub. L. 115–282 note preceding section 101 of Title 14, Coast Guard.

#### Codification

In subsec. (a)(1), "subchapter IV of chapter 5 of title 40" substituted for "section 204 of the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949 (40 U.S.C. 485)" on authority of Pub. L. 107–217, §5(c), Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1303, the first section of which enacted Title 40, Public Buildings, Property, and Works.

#### Amendments

2010—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 111–245 substituted "title 10, by section 93 of title 14, or by section 321n or 464 of this title, gifts or donations" for "title 10 and by section 93 of title 14, gifts or donations".

2003—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 108–7 substituted "Except as authorized by section 2601 of title 10 and by section 93 of title 14, gifts" for "Gifts".

1 See References in Text note below.
MEMORANDUM

TO: Assistant Inspector General for Audit

Assistant Inspector General for Evaluation, Inspection

and Management Services

Assistant Inspector General for Investigation

Assistant Inspector General for Information Technology Audit

and Computer Crime Investigations

Counsel to the Inspector General

FROM: Inspector General

SUBJECT: Redelegation of Authority to Request Disclosure of Records Maintained by 

Another Federal Agency

I. DELEGATION

Under the authority vested in me by a delegation from the Secretary, EA/EF/78, 

certified July 22, 1994, I hereby delegate to you and to anyone serving for you in 

an acting capacity, the authority to make written requests for the Office of 

Inspector General (OIG) to another agency or to any instrumentality of the U.S. 

Government for records for a legally authorized OIG civil or criminal law 

enforcement activity, pursuant to the Privacy Act of 1974, as amended, 5 U. S.C. 

§552a(b)(7).

Unless otherwise noted in future delegations of authority, future legislative 

amendments to the authority delegated herein are included within the scope of this 

delegation.

II. RESERVATIONS:

 None.

III. REDELEGATION

Upon the written approval of the Inspector General, you may redelegate this 

authority to Deputy Assistant Inspectors General in Headquarters, Regional 

Inspectors General for Audit, and Special Agents in Charge in the field (formerly 

Regional Inspectors General for Investigation).

Page 2 – Redelegation of Authority

IV. CERTIFICATION AND EFFECTIVE DATE

This delegation is effective upon certification by the Department’s Principal 

Delegations Control Officer and supersedes delegations EF/EFI/79 and 

EF/EFA/80.

I hereby ratify actions within the scope of this delegation taken by the addressees 

prior to the date of certification.

 _________/s/__________ 

John P. Higgins, Jr.

OGC Clearance and Date: /s/ David Berthiaume, 7/13/2004

Certified Date: 7/23/2004

Departmental Delegations Control Officer: /s/ Naty G. Beetle

Control Number: EF/EFI/153
EERE Information Center

Programs and Offices

Search Help More Search Options

Printable Version

Small Electric Motors Notice of Proposed Rulemaking

Technical Support Document

This page presents the chapters and appendices from the technical support

document, which provides the analyses and results supporting the notice of

proposed rulemaking for small electric motors.

The following documents are available as Adobe Acrobat PDFs. Download Adobe

Reader.

Title Page (PDF 68 KB)

Chapters

Chapter 1: Introduction (PDF 45 KB)

Chapter 2: Analytical Framework (PDF 171 KB)

Chapter 3: Market and Technology Assessment (PDF 274 KB)

Chapter 4: Screening Analysis (PDF 212 KB)

Chapter 5: Engineering Analysis (PDF 518 KB)

Chapter 6: Energy Use Characterization (PDF 182 KB)

Chapter 7: Markups for Equipment Price Determination (PDF 243 KB)

Chapter 8: Life-Cycle Cost and Payback Period Analysis (PDF 652 KB)

Chapter 9: Shipments Analysis (PDF 293 KB)

Chapter 10: National Impact Analysis (PDF 468 KB)

Chapter 11: Life-Cycle Cost Sub-Group Analysis (PDF 183 KB)

Chapter 12: Manufacturer Impact Analysis (PDF 913 KB)

Chapter 13: Utility Impact Analysis (PDF 86 KB)

Chapter 14: Employment Impact Analysis (PDF 85 KB)

Chapter 15: Environmental Assessment (PDF 139 KB)

Chapter 16: Regulatory Impact Analysis (PDF 253 KB)

Appendices

Appendix 5A: Construction and Performance Specifications of Small Electric

Motors Designed for the Engineering Analysis (PDF 704 KB)

Appendix 8A: User Instructions for Life-Cycle Cost and Payback Period

Analysis Spreadsheet (PDF 24 KB)

Appendix 8B: Life-Cycle Cost and Payback Period Analysis Results (PDF 368

KB)

Appendix 8C: Life-Cycle Cost Sensitivity Analyses (PDF 772 KB)

Appendix 8D: Life-Cycle Cost and Payback Period Results by Product Class

(PDF 527 KB)

Appendix 8E: Life-Cycle Cost and Payback Period Results at 3% and 7%

Discount Rates (PDF 645 KB)

Appendix 10A: User Instructions for National Impact Analysis Spreadsheet

(PDF 40 KB)

Appendix 10B: National Energy Savings and Net Present Value Results (PDF

54 KB)

Appendix 10C: National Energy Savings and Net Present Value Sensitivity

Analysis (PDF 427 KB)

Appendix 12A: Manufacturer Impact Analysis Interview Guide (PDF 484 KB)

Appendix 12B: Government Regulatory Impact Model Help Document (PDF 70

KB)

Appendix 16A: Regulatory Impact Analysis Supporting Material (PDF 65 KB)

Printable Version

Building Technologies Program Home | EERE Home | U.S. Department of Energy

Webmaster | Web Site Policies | Security & Privacy | USA.gov

Content Last Updated: 12/03/2009

Appliances and Commercial Equipment Standards: Small Electric Motor... http://www1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/appliance_standards/commercial...

1 of 1 12/17/2009 12:29 PM

EERE-2007-BT-STD-0007 COMMENT 19
THE SECRETARY OF EDUCATION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20202

MEMORANDUM

TO: Under Secretary

FROM: The Secretary

SUBJECT: Delegation of Authority

I. DELEGATION

Under the authority vested in me by Section 412 of the Department of Education 

Organization Act (the Act), 20 U.S.C. 3472, and in accordance with Section 

220(a) of the Act, I delegate to you and to anyone serving for you in an acting 

capacity, the authority to designate an office of the Department to coordinate the 

activities of the Department as they relate to the outlying areas as defined in 

Section 220(d) of the Act.

II. RESERVATIONS

None.

III. REDELEGATION

You may redelegate the authority delegated to you. 

IV. CERTIFICATION AND EFFECTIVE DATE

This delegation is effective upon certification of the Department's Delegations 

Control Officer. I ratify actions within the scope of this delegation taken by you 

prior to certification of this delegation.

_________/s/____________

 Rod Paige

OGC Concurrence and Date: /s/ Pamela Gault, 3/27/02

Certified Date: 4/5/2002

Departmental Delegations Control Officer: /s/ Naty G. Beetle

Control Number: EA/EE/27
#### POLACSEK v. MANHATTAN RY. CO.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.

June 22, 1903.)

1.' Railroads—Engine Setting Fire—Negligence—Sufficiency op Evidence.

Evidence in an action for damages from a fire caused by sparks from defendant’s engine, which burned an awning and some signs, *held*insufficient to show negligence in defendant.

Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan.

Action by Leo Polacselc against the Manhattan Railway Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals. Reversed.

Argued before FREEDMAN, P. J., and GILDERSLEEVE and MacLEAN, JJ.

Charles A. Gardiner (Merrill W. Gallaway and I. Townsend Burden, Jr., of counsel), for appellant.

Goldfogle, Cohn & Lind, for respondent.

FREEDMAN, P. J.

This action is one for damages to personal property, arising out of the following circumstances: The plaintiff’s son testified that a shower of sparks from the funnel of one of the defendant’s engines fell on the plaintiff’s awning, setting it on fire. This fire extended to. some signs over the awning, and to a wooden figure below it. Plaintiff claims $69.50 damages, and recovered a judgment.

The evidence does not disclose from which of the defendant’s engines the sparks fell, nor were any of the plaintiff’s witnesses able to identify the engine. We fail to see how or in what respect the defendant was shown to be negligent. The defendant proved that all of its engines were equipped with the most modern and best appliances known for averting sparks and cinders, and that on the morning in question all the engines used on the line where the awning was burned were carefully inspected, and found to be in good condition. Stress is laid by the respondent upon the testimony of an expert witness called by the defendant, to the effect that, if sparks-of the size shown by plaintiff’s witness to have been emitted from *141the engine were emitted, the engine could not have been in order; but the witness also testified that such emission of sparks would show not only that the engine could not have been in order, but that, under the system of inspection adopted and in force by the defendant, it would show that such engine got out of order in transit from the terminal to the point where the sparks came forth. The case of Flynn v. N. Y. C. R. Co., 142 N. Y. 11, 36 N. E. 1046, is decisive of this case.

Judgment reversed. New trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event. All concur.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

MEMORANDUM

TO: Addressees (See Below)

FROM: Director, Risk Management Service

Office of the Secretary

SUBJECT: Redelegation of Authority for Grants and Cooperative Agreements

I. DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY

Under the authority vested in me from the Secretary by delegation EA/EAR/165,

certified on March 26, 2008, and except as noted in section II below, I delegate to 

you, to your successor in function, and to anyone serving for you in an acting 

capacity, the authority to perform functions related to the award, management and 

oversight of formula and discretionary grants and cooperative agreements within your 

programmatic authority. This includes the authority to take any action as deemed 

appropriate and necessary to manage and mitigate risks associated with high risk or 

at-risk grants and grantees, within your programmatic authority.

Unless otherwise noted in future delegations of authority, amendments to the 

authority delegated in this document are included within the scope of this 

delegation.

II. RESERVATIONS

Unless otherwise noted in existing or future delegations of authority, the 

following are not delegated:

A. The authority to set administrative policy for formula and discretionary 

grants and cooperative agreements, including issuing Department 

directives, handbooks, and manuals relating to grants and cooperative 

agreements.

B. The authority to impose non-procurement debarments and suspensions and 

to manage enforcement of non-debarments and suspensions.
Page 2 - Redelegation of Authority for Grants and Cooperative Agreements

C. The authority to issue licenses to individuals to record obligations and 

award grant funds for discretionary grants and cooperative agreements.

D. The authority as final arbiter on cross-Department risk management 

strategies developed to manage and mitigate risks associated with 

Department high-risk or at-risk grants and grantees. 

 

III. REDELEGATION

You may redelegate the authority delegated to you.

IV. CERTIFICATION AND EFFECTIVE DATE

This delegation is effective upon certification by the Department's Principal 

Delegations Control Officer and supersedes all previous delegations of this 

authority. I ratify actions within the scope of this delegation taken by the 

addressees prior to the date of certification.

 

_________/s/____________

 Phil Maestri

OGC Clearance and Date: 3/28/2008

Certified Date: 4/11/2008

Departmental Delegations Control Officer: /s/ Naty G. Beetle

Control Number: EAR/EH/90

ADDRESSEE LIST:

Deputy Secretary 

Assistant Secretary for Special Education and Rehabilitative Services ◄▬▬

Assistant Secretary for Postsecondary Education

Assistant Deputy Secretary for Safe and Drug-Free Schools

Director, Institute of Education Sciences

Assistant Secretary for Elementary and Secondary Education

Assistant Deputy Secretary and Director for English Language Acquisition

Assistant Deputy Secretary for Innovation and Improvement

Assistant Secretary for Vocational and Adult Education
INL RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT

Science

Environmental & Waste Technologies

INL’s toolkit for energy

production waste

management technologies

INL has long been the site

where basic science is moved

from the laboratory to the real

world to address some of the

world’s most technologically

vexing energy and environmental challenges. With a

proven track record, INL is

recognized as the “Home of

Science and Engineering

Solutions”— especially with

regard to its toolkit of technologies related to the

following environmental

remediation and waste

management programs and

projects:

• Waste minimization

technologies

• Regulatory expertise and

support

• Spent nuclear fuel packaging and transportation

• Handling and shipping

hazardous and radioactive

wastes

• Low-level waste stabilization technologies

• Waste inventory tracking

and control management

systems

• Decontamination &

decommissioning

• Time- and non-time

critical removal actions

An invitation to our EPRI Partners...

Come and share science and engineering solutions to global challenges!

If you haven’t heard the latest on environmental cleanup or visited

the Idaho National Laboratory (INL)— this is a great opportunity to

learn about technical waste management, partnerships,

collaborations, technology transfer, joint R&D efforts, and specialized

technical services and support.

For more information

INL is a U.S. Department of Energy

national laboratory operated by

Battelle Energy Alliance

Jay Roach, Manager

(208) 526-4974

Jay.Roach@inl.gov

Mike Connolly, Director

(208) 533-0238

Michael.Connolly@inl.gov

We invite you to come and

see some of our hallmark

technologies – and share with

us your unique capabilities as

well. Our team can help plan

your visit and will accommodate individual and group

scheduling needs. We look

forward to hearing from you

soon!

05-GA50193-59
Office of the Chief Information Officer 

Effective 1/6/2019
#### In the Matter of John A. Foley et al., Appellants, v Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of Hastings-On-Hudson, Respondent.

Judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated May 15, 1978, affirmed, with costs, on the opinion of Mr. Justice Slifkin at Special Term. Hopkins, J. P., Damiani, Gulotta and Hawkins, JJ., concur.
### SUBCHAPTER II—OFFICE OF SPECIAL COUNSEL
### §136w–6. Environmental Protection Agency minor use program

(a) The Administrator shall assure coordination of minor use issues through the establishment of a minor use program within the Office of Pesticide Programs. Such office shall be responsible for coordinating the development of minor use programs and policies and consulting with growers regarding minor use issues and registrations and amendments which are submitted to the Environmental Protection Agency.

(b) The Office of Pesticide Programs shall prepare a public report concerning the progress made on the registration of minor uses, including implementation of the exclusive use as an incentive for registering new minor uses, within 3 years of the passage of the Food Quality Protection Act of 1996.

(June 25, 1947, ch. 125, §31, as added Pub. L. 104–170, title II, §210(i), Aug. 3, 1996, 110 Stat. 1500.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The passage of the Food Quality Protection Act of 1996, referred to in subsec. (b), probably means the date of enactment of Pub. L. 104–170, which was approved Aug. 3, 1996.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 31 of act June 25, 1947, ch. 125, was renumbered section 35 and is classified to section 136y of this title.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 565 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 565

 To amend title 31, United States Code, to provide for transparency of 
                 payments made from the Judgment Fund.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 8, 2017

 Mrs. Fischer (for herself, Mr. Gardner, Mr. Grassley, and Mr. Crapo) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 31, United States Code, to provide for transparency of 
                 payments made from the Judgment Fund.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Judgment Fund Transparency Act of 
2017''.

SEC. 2. JUDGMENT FUND TRANSPARENCY.

    (a) Transparency Requirement.--Section 1304 of title 31, United 
States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(d) Unless the disclosure of such information is otherwise 
prohibited by law or court order, the Secretary of the Treasury shall 
make available to the public on a Web site, as soon as practicable, but 
not later than 30 days after the date on which a payment under this 
section is tendered, the following information with regard to that 
payment:
            ``(1) The name of the specific agency or entity whose 
        actions gave rise to the claim or judgment.
            ``(2) The name of the plaintiff or claimant.
            ``(3) The name of counsel for the plaintiff or claimant.
            ``(4) The amount paid representing principal liability and 
        any amounts paid representing any ancillary liability, 
        including attorney fees, costs, and interest.
            ``(5) A brief description of the facts that gave rise to 
        the claim.
            ``(6) The name of the agency that submitted the claim.''.
    (b) Implementation.--The Secretary of the Treasury shall implement 
the amendment made by this section beginning not later than 60 days 
after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
§ 767.16 Civil penalties for violations of Act or permit conditions. ( a ) *In general.* Any person who violates the SMCA, or any regulation or permit issued thereunder, shall be liable to the United States for a civil penalty.
( b ) *Assessment and amount.* The Secretary may assess a civil penalty under this section of not more than $100,000 for each violation.
( c ) *Continuing violations.* Each day of a continuing violation of the SMCA or these regulations or any permit issued hereunder constitutes a separate violation.
( d ) *In rem liability.* A vessel used to violate the SMCA shall be liable in rem for a penalty for such violation.
### Part A—Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security
#### § 203.15 Method of payment.

The SAP set forth in FAR (48 CFR part 13) require purchase orders to be conducted on a firm-fixed-price basis, unless otherwise authorized by agency procedures. The Department of Defense anticipates all TAPP awards to be firm-fixed-price procurements.
i i i i i i



### MEM ORA ND UM OP INION No

. 04 -0 8- 00 77 6- CV L ouise V. KA NDAK

AI , Appellant

v . Ste ph e n M ic ha e l TEN NI SON ,

Appellee Fr om the 37th J udicial District Court, Be x ar County , Texas

Trial Court No. 2005-CI -18310 Honora ble David A. B erc helmann, Jr., J udg e Presiding PER C URI AM Sitt ing: Phy lis J . Speedlin, J ustice

Rebec ca Simmons, J ustice Steven C. Hilbig, Just ice Deliver ed and F iled: Febr uary 11, 2009 DI SMI SSED Appellant has f

iled a motion to dism iss this appea l. T h e m o t i o n contains a certific ate of service to appellee , and the a ppellee ha s not opposed t he mot ion. There fore , we g rant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 42 .1 (a )( 1) . Co sts of the a pp e a l a re ta xed

a g a ins t a pp e lla nt. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 42.1(d).

PER CU RI AM