### 50504 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 162 / Tuesday, August 21, 2012 / Notices

6 The definition of yard truck is at section 2025 and two-engine sweeper is defined at 2025(d)(58). auxiliary engine used to power thebroom or vacuum functions on twoengine sweepers. 6

As stated above, EPA is offering the opportunity for a public hearing, and requesting written comments on issues relevant to a full waiver analysis. Specifically, please provide comment on: (a) Whether CARB’s determination that its standards, in the aggregate, are at least as protective of public health and welfare as applicable federal standards is arbitrary and capricious, (b) California needs separate standards to meet compelling and extraordinary conditions, and (c) California’s standards and accompanying enforcement procedures are consistent with section 209 of the Act.
II. Procedures for Public Participation

If a hearing is held, the Agency will make a verbatim record of the proceedings. Interested parties may arrange with the reporter at the hearing to obtain a copy of the transcript at their own expense. Regardless of whether a public hearing is held, EPA will keep the record open until October 22, 2012. Upon expiration of the comment period, the Administrator will render a decision on CARB’s request based on the record of the public hearing, if any, relevant written submissions, and other information that he deems pertinent.

Persons with comments containing proprietary information must distinguish such information from other comments to the great possible extent and label it as ‘‘Confidential Business Information’’ (CBI). If a person making comments want EPA to base its decision in part on a submission labeled CBI, then a non-confidential version of the document that summarizes the key data or information should be submitted for the public docket. To ensure that proprietary information in not inadvertently place in the docket, submissions containing such information should be sent directly to the contact person listed above and not to the pubic docket. Information covered by a claim of confidentiality will be disclosed by EPA only to the extent allowed and by the procedures set forth in 40 CFR Part 2. If no claim of confidentiality accompanies the submission when EPA receives it, EPA will make it available to the public without further notice to the person making comments. Dated: August 9, 2012. Margo Tsirigotis Oge, Director, Office of Transportation and Air Quality, Office of Air and Radiation.
[FR Doc. 2012–20499 Filed 8–20–12; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6560–50–P**

**ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY** 

**[Regional Docket Nos. V–2011–1, FRL9717– 8]** 

**Clean Air Act Operating Permit Program; Action on Petition for**  **Objection to State Operating Permit for Georgia-Pacific Consumer Products** 

**AGENCY :**  Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

**ACTION :**  Notice of final Order on petition to object to Clean Air Act (Act) Title V operating permit.

**SUMMARY :**  This document announces that the EPA Administrator has denied a petition from the Sierra Club, the Clean Water Action Council and the Midwest Environmental Defense Center asking EPA to object to a Title V operating permit issued by the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (WDNR) to Georgia-Pacific Consumer Products (Georgia-Pacific).

Sections 307(b) and 505(b)(2) of the Act provide that a petitioner may ask for judicial review of those portions of the petition which EPA denies in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit. Any petition for review shall be filed within 60 days from the date this notice appears in the Federal Register , pursuant to section 307 of the Act.

**ADDRESSES :**  You may review copies of the final Order, the petition, and other supporting information at the EPA Region 5 Office, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604. If you wish to examine these documents, you should make an appointment at least 24 hours before visiting day. Additionally, the final Order for the Georgia-Pacific petition is available electronically at: http://www.epa.gov/ region7/air/title5/petitiondb/ petitiondb.htm.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Genevieve Damico, Chief, Air Permits Section, Air Programs Branch, Air and Radiation Division, EPA, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604, telephone (312) 353–
4761.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  The Act affords EPA a 45-day period to review and object, as appropriate, to Title V operating permits proposed by state permitting authorities. Section 505(b)(2) of the Act authorizes any person to petition the EPA Administrator within 60 days after the expiration of the EPA review period to object to a Title V operating permit if EPA has not done so. A petition must be based only on objections to the permit that were raised with reasonable specificity during the public comment period provided by the state, unless the petitioner demonstrates that it was impracticable to raise issues during the comment period, or the grounds for the issues arose after this period.

On July 23, 2011, EPA received a petition from the Sierra Club, the Clean Water Action Council and the Midwest Environmental Defense Center (Petitioners) requesting that EPA object to the Title V operating permit for Georgia-Pacific. The Petitioners alleged that the permit is not in compliance with the requirements of the Act. Specifically, the Petitioners alleged that: (1) The permit lacks applicable prevention of significant deterioration (PSD) requirements because WDNR erroneously exempted as ‘‘routine maintenance, repair, and replacement’’ projects that resulted in a significant net emissions increase based on the applicable ‘‘actual to potential’’ emissions test; (2) the permit lacks applicable PSD and new source performance standard requirements that were triggered through non-exempt fuel switching and WDNR improperly deferred addressing this issue; and, (3) the permit lacks applicable requirements ensuring protection of air quality increments which apply pursuant to the Wisconsin state implementation plan and the PSD
programs.

On July 23, 2012, the Administrator issued an Order denying the petition. The Order explains the reasons behind EPA’s conclusion.

Dated: July 27, 2012. Susan Hedman, Regional Administrator, Region 5.
[FR Doc. 2012–20519 Filed 8–20–12; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6560–50–P**

**ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY** 

**[FRL–9719–3]**

**Good Neighbor Environmental Board Notification of Public Advisory**  **Committee Teleconference**

**AGENCY :**  Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

**ACTION :**  Notification of Public Advisory Committee Teleconference.