alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned,Alexander Lidow, the Chief Executive Officer of International RectifierCorporation (the “Company”), pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, hereby certifiesthat:

(i)            theannual report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended June 30,2006 (the “Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(ii)           theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and forthe periods presented in the Report.
| Dated: September 15, 2006 |                                 |   |
|---------------------------|--------------------------------------|--------|
|                      |                                 |   |
|                      |                                 |   |
|                      | /s/ ALEXANDER LIDOW                  |   |
|                      | Alexander Lidow                      |
|                      | Director and Chief Executive Officer |

 

A signed original of the written statement required bySection 906 has been provided to International Rectifier Corporation and willbe furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

----
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 2 (Tuesday, January 5, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 354]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-29137]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-90817; File No. SR-NYSEArca-2020-46]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Arca, Inc.; Notice of 
Withdrawal of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend NYSE Arca Rule 5.2-
E(j)(6) Relating to Options-Linked Securities

December 29, 2020.
    On June 10, 2020, NYSE Arca, Inc. (``Exchange'' or ``NYSE Arca'') 
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission''), 
pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a proposed rule change to 
amend NYSE Arca Rule 5.2-E(j)(6) to accommodate Exchange listing and 
trading of Options-Linked Securities. The proposed rule change was 
published for comment in the Federal Register on June 22, 2020.\3\ On 
July 28, 2020, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,\4\ the 
Commission designated a longer period within which to approve the 
proposed rule change, disapprove the proposed rule change, or institute 
proceedings to determine whether to disapprove the proposed rule 
change.\5\ On September 16, 2020, the Commission instituted proceedings 
under Section 19(b)(2)(B) of the Act \6\ to determine whether to 
approve or disapprove the proposed rule change.\7\ On December 7, 2020, 
the Commission designated a longer period within which to issue an 
order approving or disapproving the proposed rule change.\8\ The 
Commission received no comment letters on the proposed rule change. On 
December 29, 2020, the Exchange withdrew the proposed rule change (SR-
NYSEArca-2020-46).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 89073 (June 16, 
2020), 85 FR 37488.
    \4\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
    \5\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 89412, 85 FR 46744 
(August 3, 2020).
    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
    \7\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 89898, 85 FR 59572 
(September 22, 2020).
    \8\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 90575, 85 FR 80206 
(December 11, 2020). The Commission designated February 17, 2021, as 
the date by which the Commission shall either approve or disapprove 
the proposed rule change.
    \9\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\9\
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020-29137 Filed 1-4-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
MEMORANDUM

TO: Assistant Inspector General for Audit

Assistant Inspector General for Evaluation, Inspection

and Management Services

Assistant Inspector General for Investigation

Assistant Inspector General for Information Technology Audit

and Computer Crime Investigations

Counsel to the Inspector General

FROM: Inspector General

SUBJECT: Delegation of Authority to Sign and Issue Inspector General's Subpoenas

I. DELEGATION

Under the authority vested in me by Section 3(a) of the Inspector General Act of 

1978, as amended (the Act), 5 U.S.C. Appendix 3, I hereby delegate to you, your 

successor in function, and anyone serving for you in an acting capacity, the 

authority under Section 6(a)(4) of the Act to issue Inspector General's subpoenas

in furtherance of the duties and functions of the Office of Inspector General 

(OIG).

Unless otherwise noted in future delegations of authority, amendments to the 

authorities delegated herein are included within the scope of this delegation.

II. RESERVATIONS

None.

III. REDELEGATION

You may redelegate this authority to OIG supervisors. No further redelegation is 

authorized.
Page 2 – Delegation of Authority

IV. CERTIFICATION AND EFFECTIVE DATE

This delegation is effective upon certification by the Department's Principal 

Delegation Control Officer, and supersedes delegations EF/EFI/112, EF/EFA/126 

and EF/EFA/127. I hereby ratify actions within the scope of this delegation taken 

by you prior to certification of this delegation.

_________/s/_____________ 

 John P. Higgins, Jr.

OGC Clearance and Date: /s/ David Berthiaume, 7/13/2004

Certified Date: 7/23/2004

Departmental Delegations Control Officer: /s/ Naty G. Beetle

Control Number: EF/EFB/147
Motion Granted and Order filed July 2, 2015 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-14-00858-CV

____________

PHILLIPS DEVELOPMENT & REALTY, LLC, Appellant

V.

LJA ENGINEERING, INC., F/K/A LJA ENGINEERING & SURVEYING, 

INC., Appellee

On Appeal from the 127th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2013-67390

ORDER

This is an appeal from a judgment signed October 7, 2014. On June 9, 2015, 

PDRH, L.L.C. filed a motion to withdraw its notice of appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 

42.1. The motion is GRANTED. 

Appellant PDRH, L.L.C. is ordered DISMISSED from the appeal.
PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Christopher, Brown and Wise.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS THEN
ENDED AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                             544
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,412
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   2,956
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,630
<BONDS>                                          3,396
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                1
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      (2,071)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     2,956
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   310
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       25
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                (1,515)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 422
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,378
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,378
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,378
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    1,378
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    1,378
        

</TABLE>
§ 755.3 Claims not cognizable. The following claims are not cognizable under this chapter. ( a ) Claims resulting from simple negligence.
( b ) Claims of subrogees.
( c ) Claims for personal injury or death.
( d ) Claims arising from acts or omissions within the scope of employment of the offender.
( e ) Claims for reimbursement for damage, loss, or destruction of Government property.
EXHIBIT 15.1

Board of Directors
Eckerd Corporation:


RE: Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 33-50223)

With respect to the subject registration statement, we acknowledge our awareness
of the use therein of our report dated June 15,  1998,  related to our review of
interim  financial  information,  which  report was included in the Form 10-Q of
Eckerd  Corporation and subsidiaries (a wholly-owned  subsidiary of J. C. Penney
Company, Inc.) for the thirteen weeks ended May 2, 1998.

Pursuant to Rule 436(c)  under the  Securities  Act of 1933,  such report is not
considered  a part of a  registration  statement  prepared  or  certified  by an
accountant or a report prepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning
of Sections 7 and 11 of the Act.


/s/ KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP

Tampa, Florida
June 15, 1998
#### In re ALBERT’S ESTATE.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

February 6, 1903.)

In the matter of John Albert, Jr., deceased. C. G. Moritz, for appellant. A. E. Pressinger, for respondent. No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs. See 76 N. Y. Supp. 965.
#### The People of the State of New York *ex*rel. Amelia Malave, by Her Guardian ad Litem, Elizabeth Carcich, Appellant, v. John Vasta et al., Respondents.

Motion to dispense with printing granted. The appeal will be heard on the original papers (including the typewritten minutes) and on a typewritten brief. The appellant is directed to file five copies of her brief and to serve one copy on the respondents. Nolan, P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur.
#### Clarence Dixon, Jr., an Infant, by His Father and Natural Guardian, Clarence Dixon, et al., Respondents, v Eastern State Construction Co., Appellant, et al., Defendants. (And a Third-Party Action.)

[831 NYS2d 705]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Milton A. Tingling, J.), entered July 24, 2006, which granted plaintiffs’ motion to reinstate the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff demonstrated a sufficient excuse for the delay, in that he was relying on his prior counsel’s misrepresentations that the matter was progressing *(see Pagan v Estate of Anglero,*
      *23122 AD3d 285 [2005]). Plaintiff demonstrated he had a sufficiently meritorious cause of action to warrant going forward. Concur—Andrias, J.E, Friedman, Marlow, Williams and Catterson, JJ.
#### § 770.1 Purpose.

This subpart provides regulations and related information governing hunting and fishing on the Marine Corps Base Reservation, Quantico, VA.
#### § 746.1 Purpose.

This part implements Department of Defense Directive 5535.3 of November 2, 1973 and 41 CFR subpart 101-4.1, and sets forth the policy, terms, conditions, and procedures for the licensing of rights in domestic patents and patent applications vested in the United States of America and in the custody of the Department of the Navy.
### §196. Statutory trust established; livestock

#### (a) Protection of public interest from inadequate financing arrangements

It is hereby found that a burden on and obstruction to commerce in livestock is caused by financing arrangements under which packers encumber, give lenders security interest in, or place liens on, livestock purchased by packers in cash sales, or on inventories of or receivables or proceeds from meat, meat food products, or livestock products therefrom, when payment is not made for the livestock and that such arrangements are contrary to the public interest. This section is intended to remedy such burden on and obstruction to commerce in livestock and protect the public interest.

#### (b) Livestock, inventories, receivables and proceeds held by packer in trust for benefit of unpaid cash sellers; time limitations; exempt packers; effect of dishonored instruments; preservation of trust benefits by seller

All livestock purchased by a packer in cash sales, and all inventories of, or receivables or proceeds from meat, meat food products, or livestock products derived therefrom, shall be held by such packer in trust for the benefit of all unpaid cash sellers of such livestock until full payment has been received by such unpaid sellers: Provided, That any packer whose average annual purchases do not exceed $500,000 will be exempt from the provisions of this section. Payment shall not be considered to have been made if the seller receives a payment instrument which is dishonored: Provided, That the unpaid seller shall lose the benefit of such trust if, in the event that a payment instrument has not been received, within thirty days of the final date for making a payment under section 228b of this title, or within fifteen business days after the seller has received notice that the payment instrument promptly presented for payment has been dishonored, the seller has not preserved his trust under this subsection. The trust shall be preserved by giving written notice to the packer and by filing such notice with the Secretary.

#### (c) Definition of cash sale

For the purpose of this section, a cash sale means a sale in which the seller does not expressly extend credit to the buyer.

(Aug. 15, 1921, ch. 64, title II, §206, as added Pub. L. 94–410, §8, Sept. 13, 1976, 90 Stat. 1251.)
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 49 (Friday, March 13, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13371-13372]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-05844]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OPP-2008-0850; FRL-9922-40]

Chlorpyrifos Registration Review; Revised Human Health Risk 
Assessment; Extension of Comment Period

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.

ACTION: Notice; Extension of comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA issued a notice in the Federal Register of January 14, 
2015, concerning the availability of the chlorpyrifos registration 
review; revised human health risk assessment. This document extends the 
comment period for 45 days, from March 16, 2015 to April 30, 2015.

DATES: Comments, identified by docket identification (ID) number EPA-
HQ-OPP-2008-0850, must be received on or before: April 30, 2015.

ADDRESSES: Follow the detailed instructions provided under ADDRESSES

[[Page 13372]]

in the Federal Register document of January 14, 2015 (80 FR 1909) (FRL-
9920-64).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joel Wolf, Pesticide Re-Evaluation 
Division (7508P), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental 
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460-
0001; telephone number: (703) 347-0228; email address: 
wolf.joel@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This document extends the public comment 
period established in the Federal Register document of January 14, 
2015. In that document, EPA announced the availability of the 
chlorpyrifos registration review; revised human health risk assessment. 
EPA received several requests to extend the comment period. EPA is 
hereby extending the comment period, which was set to end on March 16, 
2015 to April 30, 2015.
    To submit comments, or access the docket, please follow the 
detailed instructions provided under ADDRESSES in the Federal Register 
document of January 14, 2015. If you have questions, consult the person 
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.

    Authority:  7 U.S.C. 136 et seq.

    Dated: February 19, 2015.
Richard P. Keigwin, Jr.,
Director, Pesticide Re-Evaluation Division, Office of Pesticide 
Programs.
[FR Doc. 2015-05844 Filed 3-12-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
#### KRINTZMAN v. INTERURBAN ST. RY. CO.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.

June 22, 1903.)

1. Imputed Negligence—Fellow Servant.

The negligence of the driver of a wagon is chargeable to a fellow servant riding on the wagon with him.

2. Street Railways—Crossing Accident—Contributory Negligence.

Where one driving a wagon on approaching a street railway track saw a car 20 feet distant, approaching rapidly, but drove on the track, he was guilty of contributory negligence.

3. Same—Contributory Negligence.

Where one sitting on the tailboard of a wagon, which was going slowly toward a railroad track, saw a car approaching 20 feet away, at a rapid rate of speed, but continued to sit where he was until he was thrown off by a collision, he was guilty of contributory negligence. •.

¶ 1. See Negligence, vol. 37, Cent. Dig. § 147.

Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Fourth District.

Action by Samuel Krintzman against the Interurban Street Railway Company. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. Reversed.

Argued before FREEDMAN, P. J„ and GILDERSLEEVE and MacLEAN, JJ.

Henry A. Robinson, for appellant.

Michael B. Feeny, for respondent.

MacLEAN, J.

Plaintiff, in the employ of the Nassau News Company, on the 17th day of November, 1902, about 4:50 o’clock in the morning, was injured as a result of a collision between defendant’s street car and the wagon of the news company, which was driven by a fellow workman westerly through Warren street, with the plaintiff sitting on the tailboard of the wagon. On reaching West Broadway a north-bound car struck the front wheel of the wagon, turned it over, throwing off the plaintiff, and causing the injury. The -driver of the wagon testified:

> “I was driving through Warren street. The team of horses just crossed the track, and an American News Company wagon ahead of me. I followed that wagon. I got my horses past and half of the front wheel, and the car struck me, and turned the wagon clean over. There was no space at all hardly between the heads of the horses and the other wagon. I was right on top of him. I followed directly behind the other wagon. What did I do before I got on the track? I drove right straight on. The car came along—■ came so fast—and turned it right over. I didn’t think the car was coming so fast. I seen the car about twenty-five feet from the track. It was about forty feet away when I first saw it, I imagine. I was about twenty-five feet *244away from the track, and I see this American News Company wagon pass.. I didn’t think the car was coming fast, and I followed him right up.”

There were no lights on the wagon, as testified ,by the plaintiff. The negligence of Ms comrade, the driver, who was negligent, was chargeable to the plaintiff, who, moreover, says that sitting on the tailboard of the wagon, which was going slowly, he saw the coming car 20 feet away, and continued sitting there until he was thrown off by the collision. The judgment should be reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to abide the event.

Judgment reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event. All concur.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CHARLES A. HAMM, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

 v. 

VENTURA DEPARTMENT OF CHILD 

SUPPORT SERVICES; et al., 

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 17-55605 

D.C. No. 2:16-cv-08381-PSG-AJW 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Philip S. Gutierrez, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 15, 2017**

Before: CANBY, TROTT, and GRABER, Circuit Judges. 

Charles A. Hamm appeals pro se from the district court’s order dismissing 

his 42 U.S.C. §1983 action after denying his application for leave to proceed in 

forma pauperis (“IFP”). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review 

for an abuse of discretion, Tripati v. First Nat’l Bank & Trust, 821 F.2d 1368, 1369 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

NOV 21 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 17-55605 

(9th Cir. 1987), and we affirm.

The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Hamm’s IFP 

application because Hamm failed to make a sufficient showing of indigency. See 

28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) (IFP statute); Escobedo v. Applebees, 787 F.3d 1226, 1234 

(9th Cir. 2015) (a plaintiff seeking IFP status must allege poverty with some 

particularity, definiteness and certainty (citation and internal quotation omitted)). 

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 10.3 Form 8-K March 31, 2006


    Exhibit
      10.3

    


    EMPLOYMENT
      AGREEMENT EXTENSION

    


    THIS
      EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION (the “Agreement”) is made and entered into
      effective as of March 31, 2006 between FindEx.com, Inc., a Nevada corporation
      (the “Corporation”), and Kirk R. Rowland (“Officer”) as a term extension to the
      previous Employment Agreement originally entered into on July 25,
      2003.

    


    R E C I T A L S

    


    
      	A.  	
              Officer
                desires to remain employed by the Corporation as Chief Financial
                Officer
                pursuant to the terms and conditions set forth in the Employment
                Agreement
                dated July 25, 2003.

            


    

    


    
      	B.  	
              The
                Corporation desires to employ Officer in such capacity pursuant to
                the
                terms and conditions set forth in the Employment Agreement dated
                July 25,
                2003.

            


    

    


    THE
      PARTIES AGREE to extend the term of the Employment Agreement for a period of
      two
      years from this date. All terms and conditions set forth in the Employment
      Agreement dated July 25, 2003 shall remain in effect for the additional two-year
      term extension.

    


    WITNESS
      WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement effective as of the day and
      year first above written.

     

    OFFICER:

     

    /s/
      Kirk R. Rowland

    Kirk
      Rowland 

    


    


    COMPANY:

     

    /s/
      Steven Malone

           
      Steven Malone

    FindEx.com,
      Inc.
§ 746.8 Additional licenses. Subject to any outstanding licenses, nothing in this part shall preclude the Chief of Naval Research from granting additional nonexclusive or limited exclusive licenses for government inventions when he determines that to do so would provide for an equitable exchange of patent rights. The following exemplify circumstances wherein such licenses may be granted: ( a ) In consideration of the settlement of an interference;
( b ) In consideration of a release of a claim of infringement; or
( c ) In exchange for, or as part of, the consideration for a license under adversely held patents.