alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### William E. McReynolds and Frederick C. Hunter, appellees, v. Henry Meinshausen et al., on appeal of Henry Meinshausen and Mary S. W. Meinshausen, appellants.

Gen. No. 29,214.

Creditor’s bill. Judgment for complainants. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. Francis S. Wilson, Judge, presiding. Heard in the third division of this court for the first district at the March term, 1924. *Certiorari*denied by Supreme Court (making opinion final).

Affirmed.

Opinion filed April 29, 1925.

Rehearing denied May 13, 1925.

C. Oscar Carlson, for appellants.

Earl J. Walker, for appellees.

Mr. Justice Thomson

delivered the opinion of the court.
#### 1.501-1 Definition.

*Significant revisions,* as used in this subpart, means revisions that alter the substantive meaning of any coverage in the FAR System and which have a significant cost or administrative impact on contractors or offerors, or a significant effect beyond the internal operating procedures of the issuing agency. This expression, for example, does not include editorial, stylistic, or other revisions that have no impact on the basic meaning of the coverage being revised.

[50 FR 2269, Jan. 15, 1985, as amended at 79 FR 24195, Apr. 29, 2014]
§ 767.8 Credentials of principal investigator. The principal investigator shall be suitably qualified as evidenced by training, education, and/or experience, and possess demonstrable competence in archaeological theory and method, and in collecting, handling, analyzing, evaluating, and reporting archaeological data, relative to the type and scope of the work proposed. A resume or curriculum vitae detailing the professional qualifications of the principal investigator must be submitted with the permit application. Additionally, the principal investigator will be required to attest that all persons on the project team shall be qualified and have demonstrated competence appropriate to their roles in the proposed activity. The principal investigator must, at a minimum, meet the following requirements: ( a ) The minimum professional qualification standards for archaeology as determined by the Secretary of the Interior's Standards and Guidelines for Archeology and Historic Preservation.
( b ) At least one year of full-time professional supervisory experience in the archaeological study of historic maritime resources or historic aviation resources. This experience requirement may concurrently account for certain stipulations of paragraph (a) of this section.
( c ) The demonstrated ability to plan, equip, fund, staff, organize, and supervise the type and scope of activity proposed.
( d ) If applicable, the demonstrated ability to submit post-operational archaeological or other technical reports in a timely manner.
### §2241b. Purchase of seeds and plants for distribution

Purchase and distribution of vegetable, field, and flower seeds, plants, shrubs, vines, bulbs, and cuttings shall be of the freshest and best obtainable varieties and adapted to general cultivation.

(R.S. §527; Apr. 25, 1896, ch. 140, 29 Stat. 106.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 415 of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

#### Amendments

1896—Act Apr. 25, 1896, struck out "by the Department of Agriculture" and "trees", and inserted "vegetable, field, and flower seeds" and "bulbs".
### §1763. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act Aug. 28, 1954, ch. 1041, title VI, §603, 68 Stat. 909, which related to allowances and benefits, was renumbered section 606D of act Aug. 28, 1954, by Pub. L. 95–501, title IV, §401(3), Oct. 21, 1978, 92 Stat. 1691, and transferred to section 1766c of this title.
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Wartime Employment, Production, and Conditions of Work in Shipyards

              																	Belman, Albert A.					,	Fleckenstein, Edna					,	Gordon, Edward Marsh					,	Kennedy, Eleanor Virginia					 and 	United States. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 						*Wartime Employment, Production, and Conditions of Work in Shipyards : Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 824*,												Washington, D.C: 								U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 										1945,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/4297,			accessed on September 21, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 20-0451

_________________

MARY-ANN YOUNG and AUTUMN

ROSE a/k/a AUTUMN YOUNG,

 Petitioners and Appellants,

 v

HAMMER, HEWITT, JACOBS & FLOCH, 

PLLC; HAMMER, QUINN & SHAW, PLLC; and 

JOHN DOES 1-10,

 Respondents and Appellees.

O R D E R

_________________

Pursuant to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classified for 

submission on briefs to a five-justice panel of this Court. 

The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to all counsel of record and to the 

Honorable Dan Wilson, District Judge.

For the Court,

Electronically signed by:

Jim Rice

Justice, Montana Supreme Court

June 9 2021

06/09/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0451
###### Editorial Note on Part 724

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 724 appear at 65 FR 62616, Oct. 19, 2000.

#### § 724.110 Reason/basis for administrative discharge.

The terms “reason for discharge” and “basis for discharge” have the same meaning. The first is a Navy term and the second is a Marine Corps term. These terms identify why an administrative discharge was issued, e.g., Convenience of the Government, Misconduct. Reasons/basis for discharge are found in the Naval Military Personnel Manual and Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual as well as predecessor publications.
**EXHIBIT 8.1**

[Letterhead of Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP]

 

 

|   | August 2, 2006 |
|--------|----------------|

 

| Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated

1585 Broadway

New York, New York 10036

  | MS Structured Asset Corp.

1585 Broadway

New York, New York 10036 |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

Ladies and Gentlemen:

We have acted as special counsel to MS Structured Asset Corp., a Delaware corporation (the “Depositor”), in connection with the Depositor’s preparation and filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) of a registration statement on Form S-3 (the “Registration Statement”) and the related prospectus (the “Prospectus”), first filed on November 12, 2002, and amended by filings on January 22, 2003, February 20, 2003, March 4, 2003, October 4, 2005, November 30, 2005, February 15, 2006, March 13, 2006, April 13, 2006, May 16, 2006, May 26, 2006, and May 31, 2006 with respect to the offering of Structured Asset Trust Unit Repackagings (the “Units”), which the Depositor plans to offer in series.  Our advice forms the basis for the discussion of federal income tax consequences appearing under the heading “UnitedStates Federal Income Taxation” in the Prospectus and the Prospectus Supplement dated August 2, 2006 (the “Prospectus Supplement”) in which we are identified as counsel; such discussion represents our opinion with respect to the material federal income tax consequences of purchasing, owning and disposing of the Units.

We hereby consent to the filing of this letter as an exhibit to the Registration Statement and the reference to this firm in the Registration Statement and the related Prospectus and Prospectus Supplement under the captions  “United States Federal Income Taxation” and “Validity of Units.”  By giving such consent, we do not admit that we are “experts” within the meaning of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the rules and regulations of the Commission issued thereunder with respect to any part of the Registration Statement, including this exhibit.

 

|   | Very truly yours,                        |
|--------|------------------------------------------|
|   |                                     |
|   | CLEARY GOTTLIEB STEEN & HAMILTON LLP |
|   |                                     |   |
|   | By                                       | /s/  James M. Peaslee                                       |
|   |                                     |       James M. Peaslee, a Partner |

 

 

|   |   |   |
|--------|--------|--------|
#### § 756.5 Investigation.

Claims arising out of the operation of NAFIs, in and outside the United States, shall be investigated in accordance with the procedures for investigating similar claims against appropriated fund activities. The Manual of the Judge Advocate General (JAGMAN), Chapter II[2] provides guidance in conducting an investigation of an incident or event likely to result in claims or civil litigation against or for DoN or the United States.

[72 FR 53425, Sept. 19, 2007]

###### Footnotes -
  756.5

[2] JAGMAN Chapter II (JAG Instruction 5800.7E) is available at the Web site of the Navy Judge Advocate General's Corps at *http://www.jag.navy.mil.*
**Exhibit 99.1**

** **

**Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to**

**18 U.S.C. Section****1350,**

**as Adopted Pursuant to**

**Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

 

In connection with the Annual Report of HCCIndustries Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ending March 29, 2003as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), Richard L. Ferraid, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, andChristopher H. Bateman, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each herebycertifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:

 

                (1)           The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

                (2)           The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresult of operations of the Company.

 

 

 
|    /s/ Richard L. Ferraid |
|-------------------------------------|
| Richard L. Ferraid                  |
| Chief Executive Officer             |
| June 23, 2003                       |

 

 

 

 

 
|   /s/ Christopher H. Bateman |   |
|-----------------------------------|--------|
| **Christopher H. Bateman**        |   |
| Chief Financial Officer           |   |
| June 23, 2003                     |   |

 

 

 

This certification accompanies this Reportpursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except tothe extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by theCompany for purposes of § 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended.

 

A signed original of this written statementrequired by Section 906 has been provided by HCC Industries Inc. and will beretained by HCC Industries Inc. and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 

 

 

----
# Cityo f Dodg e Cit y RTMENTO F

^ •-^NoPORiATIO N CIT Y HAL L::'H r OPERATION S P.O . Box 88 0 Dodg e City , KS 67801-088 0 -•.,!:</-, . A n . - ^ r Phone : 620/225-810 0 ii i ''-^ J i l ^ A i

- U J FAX : 620/225-8144 TTY : 620/225-811 5 www.dodgecity.or

g Augus t

5 , 201 1 Denni s DeVan y Chief , Essentia l Ai r

Servic e Divisio n 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenu e S E Washington , D C 2059 0 Re : Essentia l Ai r

Servic e Dodg e City , Kansa s Docke t #OST-1998-350 2 I nrespons e t o th e Department' s Orde r Requestin g Proposal s regardin g Essentia l Ai r Servic e t o th e westernKansa s communities , pleas e b e advise dtha t th e City Commissio n o f th e City o f

Dodg e City , Kansa s ha s vote d3 t o 2 t o recommen dth e continuatio no f Essentia l Ai r

Servic e at

Dodg e City b y Great

Lake s Airline s i naccordanc e withit' s mos t recen t proposal . Sincerel) ; Ken'Strobe l Cit y Manage r 

# w
§ 97.6 Responsibilities—DoD Component heads. The DoD Component heads: ( a ) Implement the policy and procedures in this part and, through their chief legal advisors, provide guidance for their respective components.
( b ) Must issue or update, as appropriate, their respective components' implementing regulations within 180 days of October 24, 2022.
### §1446d. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act Oct. 31, 1949, ch. 792, title II, §203, as added May 28, 1956, ch. 327, title VI, §601(a), 70 Stat. 212; amended Nov. 28, 1990, Pub. L. 101–624, title V, §507, 104 Stat. 3441, related to cottonseed and cottonseed oil price support program for 1991 through 1995 crops of upland cotton.
#### In the Matter of Jack Tadeles, Appellant, v. Temporary State Housing Rent Commission, Respondent.

Order entered on August 24, 1960, denying appellant’s motion for renewal of his application to vacate an order of the respondent granting a certificate of eviction, unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondent. No opinion. Concur — Rabin, J. P., Valente, McNally, Steuer and Bastow, JJ.
INL CAPABILITY 

Trade Studies / Alternatives Analysis 

 dentifying what decisions need to be made to support system design is not always easy, and there is never enough time or money to consider all the myriad alternatives available to satisfy customer needs.  System design decisions should always be based on the System Requirements underlying the topic of the decision.  Trade studies provide the needed 

information for decision making and the documentation necessary to support the decision.  Trade studies and their associated documentation eliminate second guessing of the resulting system design.   

lternatives analysis is the process of assessing the different methods for accomplishing system functions, creating system scenarios consistent with system modes and performance requirements, and developing and documenting alternate system concepts based on scenario and functional definitions.  Alternatives analysis consists of any or 

all of the following activities. 

► Conducting design analyses, simulations, and tradeoff studies to provide desired performance measurement data. 

► Using modeling and decision analysis techniques, as applicable, to collect the data stipulated by established decision criteria. 

► Conducting life-cycle cost and schedule analyses for each alternative under consideration. 

► Comparing each alternative and selecting the best one or combining the best characteristics of several alternatives into an entirely new alternative to define the preferred system solution.  

► Establishing schedule and cost baselines for the preferred system solution. 

► Allocating system functions to actual physical components (hardware, software, and peopleware) of the preferred solution. 

► Finalizing the project’s Physical System Architecture. 

Systems engineers at the Idaho National Laboratory use a broad base of experience and expertise to affect these trade studies and alternative analysis efforts and to guide informed, defensible decisions. 

Technical Contacts  

Ron Klingler (208) 526-0183 ron.klingler@inl.gov  Lori Braase (208) 526-7763 lori.braase@inl.gov  Robert Caliva (208) 526-4653 robert.caliva@inl.gov  John Collins (208) 526-3372 john.collins@inl.gov  Web Page http://www.inl.gov/syseng  

I A 

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2023-07-14T02:21:46-0400
      - Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401
      - Government Publishing Office
      - Government Publishing Office attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by Government Publishing Office
### §1379a. Legislative findings

Wheat, in addition to being a basic food, is one of the great export crops of American agriculture and its production for domestic consumption and for export is necessary to the maintenance of a sound national economy and to the general welfare. The movement of wheat from producer to consumer, in the form of the commodity or any of the products thereof, is preponderantly in interstate and foreign commerce. Unreasonably low prices of wheat to producers impair their purchasing power for nonagriculture products and place them in a position of serious disparity with other industrial groups. The conditions affecting the production of wheat are such that without Federal assistance, producers cannot effectively prevent disastrously low prices for wheat. It is necessary, in order to assist wheat producers in obtaining fair prices, to regulate the price of wheat used for domestic food and for exports in the manner provided in this part.

(Feb. 16, 1938, ch. 30, title III, §379a, as added Pub. L. 87–703, title III, §324(2), Sept. 27, 1962, 76 Stat. 626.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Inapplicability of Section

Section inapplicable to 2014 through 2018 crops of covered commodities, cotton, and sugar and inapplicable to milk during period beginning Feb. 7, 2014, through Dec. 31, 2018, see section 9092(a)(3) of this title.

Section inapplicable to 2008 through 2012 crops of covered commodities, peanuts, and sugar and inapplicable to milk during period beginning June 18, 2008, through Dec. 31, 2012, see section 8782(a)(3) of this title.

Section inapplicable to 2002 through 2007 crops of covered commodities, peanuts, and sugar and inapplicable to milk during period beginning May 13, 2002, through Dec. 31, 2007, see section 7992(a)(3) of this title.

Section inapplicable to 1996 through 2001 crops of loan commodities, peanuts, and sugar and inapplicable to milk during period beginning Apr. 4, 1996, and ending Dec. 31, 2002, see section 7301(a)(1)(H) of this title.
§ 37.220 How involved should the Government program official be in the project? ( a ) TIAs are used to carry out cooperative relationships between the Federal Government and the recipient, which requires a greater level of involvement of the Government program official in the execution of the research than the usual oversight of a research grant or procurement contract. For example, program officials will participate in recipients' periodic reviews of research progress and will be substantially involved with the recipients in the resulting revisions of plans for future effort. That increased programmatic involvement before and during program execution with a TIA can reduce the need for some Federal financial requirements that are problematic for commercial firms.
( b ) Some aspects of their involvement require program officials to have greater knowledge about and participation in business matters that traditionally would be your exclusive responsibility as the agreements officer. TIAs therefore also require closer cooperation between program officials and you, as the one who decides business matters.
§ 631.8 Participation by civil agencies. ( a ) Civil agencies or individuals may be invited to board meetings as observers, witnesses or to provide assistance where they possess knowledge or information pertaining to problem areas within the board's jurisdiction.
( b ) Announcements and summaries of board results may be provided to appropriate civil agencies.
#### § 634.23 Specified consent to impoundment.

Personnel registering POVs on DOD installations must consent to the impoundment policy. POV registration forms will contain or have appended to them a certificate with the following statement: “I am aware that (insert number and title of separate Service or DLA directive) and the installation traffic code provide for the removal and temporary impoundment of privately owned motor vehicles that are either parked illegally, or for unreasonable periods, interfering with military operations, creating a safety hazard, disabled by accident, left unattended in a restricted or control area, or abandoned. I agree to reimburse the United States for the cost of towing and storage should my motor vehicle(s), because of such circumstances, be removed and impounded.”
1

The HONORABLE CAROL E. JACKSON, Chief Judge of the United States

District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri. 

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 02-2599

___________

Blake E. Anderson; Deborah Sue *

Anderson, *

*

Appellants, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the

v. * Eastern District of Missouri.

*

Madison County Commissioners; * [UNPUBLISHED]

David L. Lewis, Sheriff; et al., *

*

Appellees. *

___________

 Submitted: March 7, 2003

 Filed: March 17, 2003

___________

Before BOWMAN, WOLLMAN, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Missouri inmate Blake Anderson (Blake) and his non-inmate wife Deborah

(Deborah), appeal the district court’s1

 adverse grant of summary judgment dismissing

their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against various officials and employees of the Madison

County Jail. Having carefully reviewed the record, we conclude that the evidence

presented below failed to establish a trialworthy issue as to Blake’s or Deborah’s
-2-

inadequate-medical-care claims, or as to Deborah’s excessive-force claim. We do not

address claims the Andersons abandoned or first raise on appeal. Accordingly, the

judgment of the district court is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
No. 88-931.

No. 88-938.

#### Crandon et al. *v.*United States; and Boeing Co., Inc. *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. [Certiorari granted, 490 U. S. 1003.] Motion of petitioners for leave to file a supplemental brief after argument granted.
### §1446b. Policy with regard to dairy products

The production and use of abundant supplies of high quality milk and dairy products are essential to the health and general welfare of the Nation: a dependable domestic source of supply of these foods in the form of high grade dairy herds and modern, sanitary dairy equipment is important to the national defense; and an economically sound dairy industry affects beneficially the economy of the country as a whole. It is the policy of Congress to assure a stabilized annual production of adequate supplies of milk and dairy products; to promote the increased use of these essential foods; to improve the domestic source of supply of milk and butterfat by encouraging dairy farmers to develop efficient production units consisting of high-grade, disease-free cattle and modern sanitary equipment; and to stabilize the economy of dairy farmers at a level which will provide a fair return for their labor and investment when compared with the cost of things that farmers buy.

(Aug. 28, 1954, ch. 1041, title II, §204(a), 68 Stat. 899.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Agricultural Act of 1954, and not as part of the Agricultural Act of 1949 which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of the 1949 Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1421 of this title and Tables.