alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Sheet1

Even Start

Impact Aid Basic Support Payments

Impact Aid Payments for Children with Disabilities

Impact Aid Construction

Indian Student Education Grants to Local Educational Agencies

Special Education Preschool Grants

Grants for Infants and Families

Career and Technical Education State Grants

Tech Prep Education State Grants

Federal Pell Grants

Federal Supplemental Educational Opportunity Grants

Federal Work Study

Leveraging Educational Assistance Partnership

Byrd Honors Scholarships

Assessing Achievement (State Assessments)

Small Rural School Achievement Program

Client Assistance State Grants

Protection and Advocacy of Individual Rights

Supported Employment State Grants

State Agency Program--Neglected and Delinquent Children and Youth Education

Mathematics and Science Partnerships

Educational Technology State Grants

21st Century Community Learning Centers

Services for Older Blind Individuals

Protection and Advocacy for Assistive Technology

Assistive Technology State Grants

Adult Basic and Literacy Education State Grants

English Literacy and Civics Education State Grants

State Grants for Incarcerated Youth Offenders

Grand Total

Federal Direct Student Loan Program

Federal Family Education Loan Program

College- and Career-Ready Students (Title I, Grants to LEAs)

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

Educational Technology State Grants

State or

Other Area

Arizona

Arkansas

California

State or

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

Compiled for posting on the WEB by the Budget Service on January 25, 2012.

College Access Challenge Grants

Rural and Low Income Schools Program

English Learner Education (English Language Acquisition)

Homeless Children and Youth Education

Independent Living State Grants

Improving Teacher Quality State Grants

Special Education -Grants to States

Vocational Rehabilitation State Grants

Education Jobs Fund

Striving Readers

School Turnaround Grants (School Improvement State Grants)

State Agency Program Migrant Student Education

Centers for Independent Living
### §450i. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 450i was editorially reclassified as section 3157 of this title.
<PAGE>

Exhibit 99.2


I, Fred C. Schulte, Chief Executive Officer of Elgin National Industries, Inc.,
certify that:


     1.   This quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Elgin National Industries, Inc.
          fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in this quarterly report fairly presents, in
          all material respects, the financial condition and results of
          operations of Elgin National Industries, Inc.



     Date: May 15, 2003                               /s/ Fred C. Schulte
                                                      -------------------
                                                      Wayne J. Conner
                                                      Chief Executive Officer
#### PRESCOTT, Respondent, v. VILLAGE OF TICONDEROGA, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

November 11, 1903.)

Action by Edwin A. Prescott against the village of Ticonderoga.

No opinion. Judgment and order "unanimously affirmed, with costs.
EXHIBIT 13.3




CONSENT OF EXPERT





I have reviewed the Annual Report of Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012, which includes information derived from my technical reports on the Property in the Durango Mining District of Mexico dated July 24, 2012 entitled "Technical Report on the Avino Property", and I concur that the information as set forth is an accurate summary of my reports. I further consent to the use in this Form 20-F of the reference to myself as an expert in the Annual Report.




TETRA TECH WARDROPDated: May 14, 2013
By:
/s/Hassan Ghaffari”Hassan Ghaffari, P.Eng.
Exhibit 10.1(b)


             Schedule of Secured Convertible Note (demand) Issued by
               NCT Group, Inc. to Carole Salkind on April 7, 2006



    Issue Date       Due Date           Principal         Conversion Price
    ----------       --------           ---------         ----------------
     04/07/06        Earlier of:         $750,000      Greater of:  (i) $0.0024;
                     (i) demand;                       or (ii) the par value of
                     or (ii) 10/07/06                  NCT Group, Inc.
                                                       common stock on the
                                                       date of conversion
#### SILVER, Respondent, v. WILLIAMS et al., Appellants.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

November 20, 1903.)

Action by Sam Silver against Thomas M. Williams and others.

No opinion. Judgment of the Municipal Court affirmed, with costs.
<PAGE>
                                   EXHIBIT 10 (e)
                                      AGREEMENT

January 5, 1996

     Reference is made to that certain Surviving Stockholders Agreement (the
"Surviving Stockholders Agreement") dated April 12, 1995 by and among Quantic
Industries, Inc. (the "Company"), James S. Fetherston ("Fetherston"), Charles
G. Davis, Jr., individually and as trustee ("Davis"), Energy Absorption
Systems, Inc. ("Energy"), and certain other parties.  The parties hereto
hereby agree that the Surviving Stockholders Agreement is modified as
follows:

     1.  The date appearing in Section 5(a) of the Surviving Stockholders
Agreement is hereby changed from January 6, 1996 to February 29, 1996.

     2.  The date appearing in Section 5(b) of the Surviving Stockholders
Agreement is hereby changed from January 6, 1996 to February 29, 1996.

     3.  The date appearing in Section 6(b) of the Surviving Stockholders
Agreement is hereby changed from January 6, 1996 to February 29, 1996.

     4.  The date appearing in the first paragraph of Section 7 of the
Surviving Stockholders Agreement is hereby changed from January 6, 1996 to
February 29, 1996.

     Agreed to and accepted as of the date first written above.


Quantic Industries, Inc.

By:/s/ James S. Fetherston                     /s/  James S. Fetherston
   --------------------------------            ----------------------------
Its: Chairman                                  James S. Fetherston
   --------------------------------
                                               /s/  Charles G. Davis, Jr.
                                               ------------------------------
Energy Absorption Systems, Inc.                Charles G. Davis, Jr.,
                                               individually and as Trustee of
By:/s/ Philip E. Rollhaus, Jr.                 Charles G. Davis, Jr. 1990
   --------------------------------            Trust Agreement dated 1/27/90
Its: Chairman                      
   --------------------------------
### §2710. Applicability of provisions to amendments to orders

The provisions of this chapter applicable to orders shall be applicable to amendments to orders.

(Pub. L. 93–428, §11, Oct. 1, 1974, 88 Stat. 1176.)
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________ No. 20

- 10896 Non

- Argument Calendar

________________________ D.C. Docket No. 9:19

- cr
- 80161

- RKA

- 1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff

- Appellee, versus KASHUS DAVIS, Defendant

- Appellant.

________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida

________________________ ( October 30, 2020 )
Be fore NEWSOM , ANDERSON, and ED CARNES , Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Kashus Davi s pleaded guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm

. See 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)

. He appeals his sentence, contend ing that the district court erroneously ruled that he qualified for a sentence enhancement under the Armed

USCA11 Case: 20-10896 Date Filed: 10/30/2020 Page: 1 of 22 Career Criminal Act (ACCA) , 18 U.S.C. § 924(e) . Davis argues th at his prior convictions under Florida Statutes § 89 3 .13(1) are not predicate “serious drug
offense [s] ” for purposes of the ACCA b ecause the Florida statute “do es not require
an element of mens rea regarding the illicit nature of the controlled substance

. ”
P rior panel precedent forecloses Davis’ argument. W e held in Smith that
F lorida Stat utes § 893.13(1) is a “ serious drug offense ” for purposes of the ACCA

. United States v. Smith , 775 F.3d 1262 , 1268 (11th Cir. 2014)

. We also held that a “serious drug offense” need not include an element of mens rea regarding the illicit
nature of the controlled substance. Id. at 1267

– 68.
We remain bound by Smith unless and until it is overruled by either the Supreme Court or us en banc. See Smith v. GTE Corp. , 236 F.3d 1292, 1300 n.8 (11th Cir. 2001). Because t hat has not happened, we affirm Davis’ sentence.
AFFIRMED. USCA11 Case: 20-10896 Date Filed: 10/30/2020 Page: 2 of 2
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Estimating cumulative trafficloads [electronic resource].**
 
finalReport -Phase 1|Phase2| 
 
SuDoc Number:TD 2.30:03-094; TD 2.30:03-054

Item Number:0982-G-11 (online)
CGP systemNumber: 001060430

 
July 18, 2018
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

IN THE MA TIER OF AIR AMBULANCE BY AIR TREK, INC. 

Docket No. FAA-2011-1003 

(FAA Enforcement Docket 2009EA03003 7) 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

Ronnie A. Yoder, Chief Administrative Law Judge 

'I 

] 

For the purposes of the hearing in this matter, the parties hereby submit the stipulations they have 

reached, as follows: 

1. Air Trek selected the Garmin GNS 530 and 530 W AAS upgrade for installation in 

N744AT. 

2. The Cessna 550 Citation turbojet is a transport category airplane certificated under Part 

25 oftheFARs. 

3. N744A Tis a Cessna 550 Citation turbojet aircraft. 

1 
4. Wayne Carr is the president of Air Trek. 

inton, Esq. 

iatio w Experts 

Research Court, Suite 450 

Rockville, MD 20850 

2 

Alfred R. Johnson, Jr. 

Regional Counsel 

By: 

Step en W. Bri , Attorney 

Federal Aviation Administration 

1 Aviation Plaza 

Jamaica, NY 11434 
CERTIFICATE_Q.f SERYICE 

I hereby certifY that on this day copies of the foregoing Submission of Stipulations were served by 

first class mail and/or fax, as indicated, to the following: 

Federal Aviation Administration (Original and one copy) 

Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building- Room 2014 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington; D.C. 20591 

(mail only) 

The Honorable Ronnie A. Yoder 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Office of Hearings, M-20, Room El2-320 

1200 New Jersey Ave., S.E. 

Washington, DC 20590 

(mail and fax to: (202) 366-7536) 

Date: June 25, 2012 

3
### FOR PUBLICATION


### UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT



#  C RAIG C LIFFORD B USCH ,

Petitioner-Appellant, No. 06-16154

v. D.C. No. J EANNE S. W OODFORD , in her CV-04-04157-MJJ capacity as Director of the Northern District



#  California Department of of California, Corrections; J OSEPH L. M C G RATH , San Francisco Warden, in his capacity as ORDER Warden, Pelican Bay State Prison,

Respondents-Appellees. 

# 

Filed November 13, 2007

Before: J. Clifford Wallace, Richard D. Cudahy,* and M. Margaret McKeown, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

The opinion filed on August 29, 2007 is hereby withdrawn. Appellant’s Petition for Panel Rehearing and for Modification of Published Opinion is rendered moot. A modified opinion will be filed at a later date.

*The Honorable Richard D. Cudahy, Senior United States Circuit Judge for the Seventh Circuit, sitting by designation.

14791PRINTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS BY THOMSON/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO

The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted © 2007 Thomson/West.
#### § 755.1 Statutory authority.

Article 139, UCMJ, redress of injuries to property, is the basis for this chapter.
# MEMORANDUM

TO:          Addressees

FROM:    The Secretary

SUBJECT:  Delegation of Authority

## I. DELEGATION

Under the authority vested in me by section 412 of the Department of Education Organization Act, 20 U.S.C. §3472, I hereby delegated to you, and to anyone serving for you in an acting capacity, for your respective Principal Office, the authority under 5 U.S.C. Section 3595(b)(3)(B), to file written objections to the Office of Personnel Management, when appropriate, based on your determination that the career Senior Executive Service employees referred failed to meet the technical qualifications for applicable position vacancies.

Unless otherwise noted in future delegations of authority, legislative amendments to the authorities delegated herein are included in the scope of this delegation.

## II. RESERVATIONS

None.

## III. REDELEGATION

This authority may not be redelegated.

## IV. CERTIFICATION AND EFFECTIVE DATE

This delegation is effective upon certification by the Department’s Principal Delegations Control Officer and supersedes all previous delegation of this authority.

___________(Signed)___________ 

Richard W. Riley

**OGC Clearance****and Date:**/s/ R. Wexler, 7/12/96

**Certification Date**:  7/31/96

**Certified by Departmental Delegations Control Officer:**/s/ Naty Beetle****

**Control Number**:   EA/EP/244

Addressees and PO Control No.

EA/EB/137 – Deputy Secretary

EA/EC/185 – Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights

EA/EE/16 – Under Secretary

EA/EF/83 – Inspector General

EA/EG/79 – General Counsel

EA/EH/69 – Assistant Secretary for Special Education and Rehabilitative Services

EA/EJ/28 - Assistant Secretary for Legislation and Congressional Affairs

EA/EK/86 - Assistant Secretary for Intergovernmental and Interagency Affairs

EA/EL/62 – Chief Financial Officer

EA/EP/244 - Assistant Secretary for Postsecondary Education

EA/ES/54- Assistant Secretary for Elementary and Secondary Education

EA/EV/58 - Assistant Secretary for Vocational and Adult Education

EA/EI/2 - Chief Information Officer

EA/EN/2 - Chief Operating Officer, Federal Student Aid

EA/EQ/2 - Deputy Under Secretary for Safe and Drug-Free Schools

EA/ER/1 - Director, Institute of Education Sciences

EA/EU/2 - Deputy Under Secretary for Innovation and Improvement
CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT

                                     OF THE

                          CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

                                       OF

                       EXCALIBUR TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION

                   ----------------------------------------- 
                   Adopted in accordance with the provisions
                   of Section 242 of the General Corporation
                          Law of the State of Delaware
                   -----------------------------------------

          The undersigned, being the President of EXCALIBUR TECHNOLOGIES

CORPORATION (the "Corporation"), a corporation existing under the laws of the

State of Delaware, does hereby cerfify as follows:

          FIRST:    That the Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation

has been amended as follows by striking out the opening paragraph of ARTICLE

FOURTH thereof as it now exists and inserting in lieu and instead therof a 

new opening paragraph of Article FOURTH, reading as follows:

          "FOURTH:  The Corporation will have authority to issue 
     Forty-One Million (41,000,000) shares of Capital Stock of
     which Forty Million (40,000,000) shares are Common Stock,
     $.01 par value per share (the "Common Stock"), and One 
     Million (1,000,000) shares are Preferred Stock, par value
     $.01 per share (the "Preferred Stock"), of whick 49,587
     shares are designated as Cumulative Convertible Preferred
     Stock (the "Convertible Preferred Stock")."


          SECOND:   That such amendment has been duly adopted in accordance 

with the provisions of Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the 

State of Delaware.

          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have signed this Certificate this 28th day 

of June, 1996.

                                   EXCALIBUR TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION


                                   By: /s/Patrick C. Condo
                                       -----------------------------
                                       Patrick C. Condo, President
### §2274. Firearm authority of employees engaged in animal quarantine enforcement

Any employee of the United States Department of Agriculture designated by the Secretary of Agriculture and the Attorney General of the United States may carry a firearm and use a firearm when necessary for self-protection, in accordance with rules and regulations issued by the Secretary of Agriculture and the Attorney General of the United States, while such employee is engaged in the performance of the employee's official duties to (1) carry out any law or regulation related to the control, eradication, or prevention of the introduction or dissemination of communicable disease of livestock or poultry into the United States or (2) perform any duty related to such disease control, eradication, or prevention, subject to the direction of the Secretary.

(Pub. L. 97–312, §1, Oct. 14, 1982, 96 Stat. 1461.)
```

[Federal Register: March 12, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 48)]
[Notices]               
[Page 11873]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr12mr10-52]                         

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

 
Notice of Fuel Cell Pre-Solicitation Workshop

AGENCY: Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, DOE.

ACTION: Notice of Fuel Cell Pre-Solicitation Workshop.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Fuel Cell Technologies Program, under the DOE Office of 
Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, is inviting the fuel cell 
research community and other stakeholders to participate in a 
discussion of the most relevant research, development, and 
demonstration topics in fuel cells and fuel cell systems appropriate 
for government funding in stationary and transportation applications as 
well as cross-cutting stack and balance of plant component technology. 
Input from workshop participants will be used to assist in the 
development of a planned Fuel Cell Funding Opportunity Announcement 
(FOA) with awards anticipated in Fiscal Year (FY) 2011.

DATES: Pre-Solicitation Workshop to be held March 16, 2010, from 12:30 
p.m.-5:30 p.m. MST and March 17, 2010, from 8:30 a.m.-3:30 p.m. MST.

ADDRESSES: The Pre-Solicitation Workshop will be held at the Sheraton 
Denver West Hotel, 360 Union Blvd., Lakewood, CO 80229.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Greg Kleen, Project Officer, via e-
mail at greg.kleen@go.doe.gov. Further information on DOE's Fuel Cell 
Technologies Program can be viewed at http://www.hydrogen.energy.gov/.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: During the Pre-Solicitation Workshop, DOE 
will have several presentations about the status of technologies for 
fuel cells and fuel cell systems in transporation and stationary 
applications. Workshop attendees will participate in breakout sessions 
where questions and comments will be solicited for suggestions about 
the research, development, and demonstration areas that should be 
included in the FOA. DOE intends to release the FOA around June of 
2010, with awards to be made in FY2011.

    Issued in Golden, CO, on March 5, 2010.
Michael A. Schledorn,
Acting Division Director, Renewable Energy Financial Assistance, Golden 
Field Office.
[FR Doc. 2010-5422 Filed 3-11-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
```
#### Primo M. Ceccorulli *v.*Liquor Control Commission

House, C. J., Loiselle, MacDonald, Bogdanski and Longo, Js.

Argued December 5

decision released December 31, 1974

*Pasquale Young,*for the appellant (plaintiff).

*Richard M. Sheridan,*assistant attorney general, with whom on the brief, was *Robert K. Killian,*attorney general, for the appellee (defendant).

Per Curiam.

This is an appeal from a decision of the defendant commission which revoked the package store permit of the plaintiff on the ground that he had failed to comply with the terms of a stipulation which he had executed and filed with the commission. The plaintiff had received a variance from the New Haven zoning board of appeals which allowed him to conduct his package store business within 1500 feet of another off-premises liquor outlet. An appeal from the granting of this variance was taken to the Court of Common Pleas and, while the appeal was pending, the commission issued a permit to the plaintiff upon the express stipulation and agreement that in the event that that appeal was sustained by the Court of Common Pleas “the permit will be immediately surrendered to the liquor control commission for cancellation, unless an appeal is taken of said decision.” The appeal from the granting of the variance was sustained by *443the Court of Common Pleas. Thereafter the plaintiff did not appeal or seek to petition this court for the certification of an appeal but instead returned to the New Haven zoning board of appeals requesting a special exception which was subsequently granted on July 10, 1973. On August 17, 1973, the commission revoked the plaintiff’s permit because of his refusal to surrender it in accordance with the terms of the stipulation. The plaintiff then appealed to the Court of Common Pleas claiming that in revoking the permit the commission had acted illegally, arbitrarily and in abuse of its discretion. That court found the issues for the defendant and ordered the appeal dismissed. It is from that judgment that the present appeal has been taken.

The plaintiff has not attacked the court’s finding of facts as thus summarized. The appeal requires no extended discussion. The plaintiff clearly failed to comply with the express terms of his stipulation and agreement with the commission and, under the circumstances, the court properly concluded that the commission did not exceed its powers in revoking the permit.

The only other claim raised by the plaintiff on the appeal is totally without merit. The commission revoked his permit on August 17,1973. He filed the appeal to the Court of Common Pleas on August 23, 1973. On September 11, 1973, he applied for a renewal of his permit and tendered a fee by cheek in the amount of $425. The commission cashed the check and notified the plaintiff: “Your renewal permit is being held in this office because of an appeal pending. Under the provisions of Section 30-82 of the General Statutes, you have the privilege *444of continued operation pending further action by the Commission or Court.” The court did not err in concluding that the commission did not renew the plaintiff’s permit.

There is no error.