alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                                                  EXHIBIT 10.S.1



                             AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE
                              STRATEGIC STOCK PLAN

         Pursuant to Sections 5.2 and 14.1 of the El Paso Energy Corporation
Strategic Stock Plan (the "Plan"), the Plan is hereby amended as follows,
effective April 1, 1998:

         Section 5.1 is amended to read as follows:

                  "5.1 Subject to Section 5.2, the maximum number of shares that
         may be issued for which options, limited stock appreciation rights,
         stock appreciation rights and Restricted Stock may at any time be
         granted under the Plan is two million (2,000,000) shares of Common
         Stock, from shares held in the Company's treasury or out of authorized
         but unissued shares of the Company, or partly out of each, as shall be
         determined by the Plan Administrator, subject to, and reduced by (on a
         post-split basis), the number of shares of Common Stock awarded prior
         to the occurrence of a two-for-one stock split effected by the Company
         in the form of a 100% stock dividend on April 1, 1998. Any options,
         limited stock appreciation rights, stock appreciation rights and shares
         of Restricted Stock outstanding under the Plan on April 1, 1998, shall
         be adjusted on a two-for-one basis to reflect the stock dividend."

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this amendment to be duly
executed on this 1st day of April, 1998.


                                          EL PASO ENERGY CORPORATION


                                          By: /s/ JOEL RICHARDS III 
                                             -----------------------------------
Attest:                                       Joel Richards III
                                              Executive Vice President
                                              Plan Administrator
/s/ David L. Siddall
----------------------------
    David L. Siddall
    Corporate Secretary
Editorial Note on Part 724
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 724 appear at 65 FR 62616, Oct. 19, 2000.

§ 724.305 Functions of the CMC and CNO. In the case of Navy, CNMPC, under the CNP, shall discharge responsibilities of the CNO. ( a ) Provide and facilitate access by the NDRB to service/health records and other data associated with performance of duty of applicants.
( b ) Advise the NDRB of developments in personnel management which may have a bearing on discharge review judgments.
( c ) Implement the discharge review decisions of the NDRB and those of higher authority within respective areas of cognizance.
( d ) Include the record of NDRB proceedings as a permanent part of the service record of the applicant in each case.
( e ) Where appropriate, recommend cases for the NDRB to review on its own motion.
( f ) Provide qualified personnel as NDRB members, recorders and administrative staff.
( g ) Establish administrative procedures to ensure that if a member is separated from the Navy or the Marine Corps under other than fully honorable conditions, the member is advised of: ( 1 ) The right to a review of his or her discharge under provisions of 10 U.S.C. 1553, and
( 2 ) The procedures for applying for such a review.
( h ) Provide Navy and Marine Corps units and activities with information on the mission of the Naval Discharge Review Board through entries in appropriate personnel administration directives.
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk December 28, 2011

d1219 

# Order

December 28, 2011

142933 & (18)(24)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 142933 COA: 299462 Wayne CC: 93-001098-01-FC RANDALL MARK BRYANT, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

By order of September 26, 2011, the pros ecuting attorney was directed to answer the application for leave to appeal the March 18, 2011 order of the Court of Appeals. On order of the Court, the answer having been received, the appli cation for leave to appeal is again considered, and it is DENIED, becaus e we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. The moti on to remand is DENIED.
### IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 21 - 0483

_________________ ST ATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. JAMIE CAL FUSON,

Defendant and Appellant. O R D E R

_________________ Pursuant to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classified for submission on briefs to a five - justice panel of this Court. The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to all counsel of record and to the Honorable Robert G. Olson , District Judge . For the Court,

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 3 2022

08/03/2022
Case Number: DA 21-0483
#### McALLISTER v. HA

No. 298PA97

Case below: 126 N.C.App. 326

Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 allowed 4 September 1997.
§ 45.14 Final and conclusive resolution. ( a ) *Administrative adjudication final.* As provided in 10 U.S.C. 2735, the adjudication and settlement of a claim under this part is final and conclusive and not subject to review in any court. Unlike the FTCA, the Military Claims Act, 10 U.S.C. chapter 163, which provides the authority for this part, does not give Federal courts jurisdiction over claims. Further, no claim under this Part may be paid unless the amount tendered is accepted by the claimant in full satisfaction.
( b ) *Additional terms of settlement agreement.* ( 1 ) Settlement agreements under this part will incorporate the requirement of section 2733a(g)(1) that no attorney may charge, demand, receive, or collect for services rendered, fees in excess of 20 percent of any claim payment amount under this part.
( 2 ) Because settlement and payment of a claim under this part is under section 2733a(b)(5) conditional on the claim not being allowed to be settled and paid under any other provision of law, a settlement agreement under this part will include a provision that it bars any other claim against the United States or DoD health care providers arising from the same set of facts.
EXHIBIT 32(a)

                             CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In  connection  with the  Annual  Report  of Enzo  Biochem,  Inc.,  and
Subsidiaries  ("the  Company")  on Form 10-K for the fiscal  year ended July 31,
2004 as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof
(the  "Report"),  I,  Elazar  Rabbani,  Ph.D.,  Chief  Executive  Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

                  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

                  (2) The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,
in all material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations of
the Company.




Dated: October 14, 2004                          By: /s/ Elazar Rabbani, PH.D.
                                                     -------------------------
                                                         Elazar Rabbani, Ph.D.
                                                         Chief Executive Officer



         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other  document  authenticating,   acknowledging,   or  otherwise  adopting  the
signature  that  appears in typed form  within  the  electronic  version of this
written statement  required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Act
Commission or its staff upon request.xtxt
### §449. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 449 was editorially reclassified as section 667g–2 of Title 16, Conservation.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL

THE INSPECTOR GENERAL

MEMORANDUM

TO: Special Agent in Charge/Investigation, Boston/New York OIG Region

Special Agent in Charge/Investigation, Washington/Philadelphia OIG Region 

Special Agent in Charge/Investigation, Atlanta OIG Region 

Special Agent in Charge/Investigation, Chicago OIG Region 

Special Agent in Charge/Investigation, Long Beach OIG Office ◄▬▬

FROM: Assistant Inspector General for Investigation 

SUBJECT: Redelegation of Authority to Sign and Issue Inspector General's Subpoenas

I. DELEGATION

Under the authority vested in me by a delegation from the Inspector General, 

Delegation Control Number EF/EFI/148, certified July 23, 2004, I hereby delegate to 

you and to anyone serving for you in an acting capacity, the authority under Section 6 

(a) (4) of the Inspector General Act of 1978, as amended, to issue Inspector General's 

subpoenas in furtherance of the duties and functions of the Office of Inspector General.

Unless otherwise noted in future delegations of authority, amendments to the 

authorities delegated herein are included within the scope of this delegation.

II. RESERVATIONS

None.

III. REDELEGATION

This authority may not be redelegated.
Page 2 - Redelegation of Authority to Sign and Issue IG's Administrative Subpoenas 

IV. CERTIFICATION AND EFFECTIVE DATE

This delegation is effective upon certification by the Department's Delegation Control 

Officer and supersedes all previous delegations of this authority. I hereby ratify actions 

within the scope of this delegation taken by the addressees prior to certification of this 

delegation.

 ____________/s/__________

 William D. Hamel

OGC Clearance and Date: /s/ David Berthiaume, 12/22/08

Certified Date: 12/31/2008

Departmental Delegations Control Officer: /s/ Naty G. Beetle

Control Number: EFI/EFD9I/181
#### Alan F. McHenry, Individually and as Assignee, Respondent, v. Fifth Avenue Synagogue et al., Appellants.

Appeal by defendants from that part of an order of the Supreme Court at Special Term entered April 4,1962 in New York County, which granted a motion by plaintiff for an order eliminating paragraph *“*Twenty-fourth ” of the second amended complaint and substituting in place thereof a new paragraph “ Twenty-fourth ” and further provided that the allegations of the said new paragraph be deemed denied.

*Per Curiam.*

Defendants appeal from so much of an order entered April 4,

1962, as granted leave to plaintiff to amend his second amended complaint by deleting therefrom paragraph Twenty-fourth, and adding a new paragraph Twenty-fourth, and directed that same be deemed denied.

Plaintiff is the lessee of the entire premises 9 East 62nd Street, Manhattan. He sues individually and as assignee in this statutory action for damages to the building allegedly caused by defendants’ failure to underpin and support its foundation in connection with certain excavation work at 5-7 East 62nd Street. The action was begun November 3,1958.

The ease had been assigned for trial when plaintiff moved to amend the complaint with respect to the assignment and the *ad damnum*clause. A mistrial was directed upon a plea of surprise by defendants. Plaintiff moved thereafter at Special Term for the relief sought, and an order was obtained from which this appeal was taken.

The amendment granted permitted the alleging of an assignment to plaintiff on March 9, 1962 of certain rights to bring or maintain the present action. It substantially altered the pleadings so as to assert new rights and, in effect, pleaded a new cause of action, at least as to certain of the defendants. Under the circumstances shown a supplemental pleading is required (Civ. Prac. Act, §§ 245, 245-a, 245-b; *Christie Bros.*v. *Ayer,*12 A D 2d 753).

Accordingly the order appealed from should be modified on the law and in the exercise of discretion to the extent of requiring plaintiff to serve a supplemental complaint in place of the former pleading containing a separate cause of action as to the March 9, 1962 assignment, with leave to defendants to answer or otherwise move with respect to such complaint, with costs to the appellant.

Breitel, J. P., Yalente, Stevens, Eager and Steuer, JJ., concur.

Order, entered on April 4, 1962, so far as appealed from, unanimously modified, on the law and in the exercise of discretion, with $20 costs and disbursements to the appellants, to the extent of requiring plaintiff to serve a supplemental complaint in place of the former pleading containing a separate cause of action as to the March 9,1962 assignment, with leave to defendants to answer or otherwise move with respect to such complaint. As thus modified, order affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.1 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO            SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of CreditRiskMonitor.com, Inc. (“CRMZ”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jerome S. Flum, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,            that, to the best of my knowledge: 
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                 |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | (1)    | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                |
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                 |
|   | (2)    | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|           |    |                    |
|----------------|---------|-------------------------|
|           | By: /s/ | Jerome S. Flum          |
|           |    | Jerome S. Flum          |
|           |    | Chief Executive Officer |
|           |    |                    |
| March 23, 2009 |    |                    |

This certification is being furnished to the SEC with this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to liability of that section.

----
David M. Kies125 Broad StreetNew York, N.Y. 10004

 

October 9, 2006

Board of Directors  ImClone Systems Incorporated

Gentlemen:

              For personal and other reasons I have decided to resign as a director of ImClone Systems. My concerns have not been about my retention of a board seat or the chairmanship, but rather that there should be appropriate representation of all shareholders on the board. ImClone is and remains a great company with a great future and I will do everything I can as a shareholder to support its stewardship in the interests of all shareholders. Effective today, I hereby submit my resignation as a director.

 

|   |   | Sincerely yours, |
|--------|--------|------------------|
|   |        |
|   |   | David M. Kies    |
### §§150aa to 150jj. Repealed. Pub. L. 106–224, title IV, §438(a)(2), June 20, 2000, 114 Stat. 454

Section 150aa, Pub. L. 85–36, title I, §102, May 23, 1957, 71 Stat. 31, defined terms as used in this chapter.

Section 150bb, Pub. L. 85–36, title I, §103, May 23, 1957, 71 Stat. 32; Pub. L. 97–461, §1(a), Jan. 12, 1983, 96 Stat. 2523; Pub. L. 100–449, title III, §301(f)(1), Sept. 28, 1988, 102 Stat. 1868; Pub. L. 103–465, title IV, §431(c)(1), Dec. 8, 1994, 108 Stat. 4967, prohibited movement of plant pests into or through the United States or interstate.

Section 150cc, Pub. L. 85–36, title I, §104, May 23, 1957, 71 Stat. 32; Pub. L. 100–449, title III, §301(f)(2), Sept. 28, 1988, 102 Stat. 1869; Pub. L. 103–465, title IV, §431(c)(2), Dec. 8, 1994, 108 Stat. 4967, prohibited mailing of plant pests.

Section 150dd, Pub. L. 85–36, title I, §105, May 23, 1957, 71 Stat. 32; Pub. L. 97–98, title XI, §1119(1), Dec. 22, 1981, 95 Stat. 1272, authorized emergency measures to prevent dissemination of plant pests.

Section 150ee, Pub. L. 85–36, title I, §106, May 23, 1957, 71 Stat. 33, authorized promulgation of regulations requiring inspection of products and articles.

Section 150ff, Pub. L. 85–36, title I, §107, May 23, 1957, 71 Stat. 34; Pub. L. 90–578, title IV, §402(b)(2), Oct. 17, 1968, 82 Stat. 1118; Pub. L. 97–98, title XI, §1119(2), Dec. 22, 1981, 95 Stat. 1273; Pub. L. 101–650, title III, §321, Dec. 1, 1990, 104 Stat. 5117, authorized warrantless stops and inspections and entries with warrants for inspections and seizures.

Section 150gg, Pub. L. 85–36, title I, §108, May 23, 1957, 71 Stat. 34; Pub. L. 97–461, §1(b), Jan. 12, 1983, 96 Stat. 2523, set forth criminal and civil penalties.

Section 150hh, Pub. L. 85–36, title I, §109, May 23, 1957, 71 Stat. 34, related to separability of provisions.

Section 150ii, Pub. L. 85–36, title I, §111, May 23, 1957, 71 Stat. 34, provided that authority conferred by this chapter was to be in addition to that conferred by other statutes.

Section 150jj, Pub. L. 85–36, title I, §111, May 23, 1957, 71 Stat. 35, provided that nothing in this chapter was to amend or repeal provisions of the Plant Quarantine Act.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Short Title

Pub. L. 85–36, title I, §101, May 23, 1957, 71 Stat. 31, provided that title I of Pub. L. 85–36, which enacted this chapter and provisions set out as a note under section 147a of this title, amended section 149 of this title, and repealed sections 141 to 144 and 441 of this title, could be cited as the "Federal Plant Pest Act", prior to repeal by Pub. L. 106–224, title IV, §438(a)(2), June 20, 2000, 114 Stat. 454.
#### Jesus B. Rios v. Alfred L. Fernandez.

Motion to dismiss appeal granted, with $10 costs, unless the appellants procure the record on appeal and appellants’ points to be served and filed on or. before August 14, 1962, with notice of argument for the September 1962 Term of this court, said appeal to be argued or submitted when reached. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Valente, Stevens, Eager and Steuer, JJ.
#### The People of the State of New York v. Edward Grimes.

Motion to dismiss appeal granted. Motion for leave to appeal as a poor person dismissed, having become academic by virtue of the decision of this court in the motion, decided herein. Concur Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, Valente and McNally, JJ.
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-88,414-01

EX PARTE MARK CHRISTOPHER WALLACE, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. W15-70026-Q(A) IN THE 204th DISTRICT COURT

FROM DALLAS COUNTY 

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of the offense of

assault - family violence and sentenced to imprisonment for two years. 

On November 2, 2017, an order designating issues was signed by the trial court. The habeas

record has been properly forwarded to this Court by the district clerk pursuant to TEX. R. APP. P.

73.4(b)(5). However, the record has been forwarded without the trial court having resolved the

designated issues in this case. We remand this application to the 204th District Court of Dallas

County to allow the trial judge to complete an evidentiaryinvestigation and enterfindings of fact and
conclusions of law.

This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The

issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all

affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or

deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall

be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time must

be requested by the trial court and shall be obtained from this Court. 

Filed: June 13, 2018

Do not publish
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1582 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1582

   Honoring the lives of those who passed away in the tragic gangway 
                  collapse on Sapelo Island, Georgia.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 19, 2024

  Mr. Carter of Georgia (for himself, Mr. McCormick, Ms. Williams of 
  Georgia, Mr. Ferguson, Mr. Johnson of Georgia, Mr. Austin Scott of 
    Georgia, Mr. Bishop of Georgia, and Mrs. McBath) submitted the 
following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight 
                           and Accountability

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Honoring the lives of those who passed away in the tragic gangway 
                  collapse on Sapelo Island, Georgia.

Whereas, on October 19, 2024, 7 individuals passed away in a tragic gangway 
        collapse on Sapelo Island, identified as--

    (1) Isaiah Thomas;

    (2) Carlotta McIntosh;

    (3) Jacqueline Crews Carter;

    (4) Cynthia Alynn Gibbs;

    (5) Queen Welch;

    (6) William Lee Johnson, Jr.; and

    (7) Charles League Houston;

Whereas numerous other victims were critically injured and hospitalized;
Whereas the Sapelo Island community has been greatly harmed by this tragedy; and
Whereas the Gullah Geechee community had gathered to celebrate Sapelo Island's 
        annual Cultural Day: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) honors the memory of the victims of this tragedy, 
        identified as--
                    (A) Isaiah Thomas;
                    (B) Carlotta McIntosh;
                    (C) Jacqueline Crews Carter;
                    (D) Cynthia Alynn Gibbs;
                    (E) Queen Welch;
                    (F) William Lee Johnson, Jr.; and
                    (G) Charles League Houston;
            (2) extends its condolences to the families and friends of 
        the victims;
            (3) extends its condolences to the entire Gullah Geechee 
        community;
            (4) expresses hope that those wounded make a full recovery; 
        and
            (5) expresses appreciation and thanks for law enforcement, 
        and all first responders that helped render aid to victims.
                                 <all>
```
#### STATE v. RUFF

No. 550PA97

Case below: 127 N.C.App. 575

Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 and Appellate Rule 16(b) as to issues in addition to those presented as the basis for the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals denied 6 January 1998.