alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S 1995 10-K AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          16,584
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   25,559
<ALLOWANCES>                                       577
<INVENTORY>                                     18,031
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                66,292
<PP&E>                                          21,204
<DEPRECIATION>                                  11,336
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  91,462
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           22,392
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           128
<OTHER-SE>                                      68,942
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    91,462
<SALES>                                         86,415
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               101,536
<CGS>                                           51,408
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   60,330
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                30,894
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  11
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 10,977
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (856)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             11,833
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    11,833
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .96<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .94
<FN>
<F1> For Purposes of This Exhibit, Primary means Basic.
</FN>


</TABLE>
### §3904. Authorization of appropriations; restriction

(a) There are hereby authorized to be appropriated to administer the program under this chapter $25,000,000 for fiscal year 1982, and $25,000,000 annually thereafter through the end of fiscal year 1986.

(b) Not more than 30 per centum of any of the amounts appropriated under this section in any fiscal year may be obligated for research under section 3902 of this title at facilities of the Department of Agriculture.

(Pub. L. 96–469, §5, Oct. 17, 1980, 94 Stat. 2235.)
§ 37.1100 What are my responsibilities generally as an administrative agreements officer for a TIA? As the administrative agreements officer for a TIA, you have the responsibilities that your office agreed to accept in the delegation from the office that made the award. Generally, you will have the same responsibilities as a post-award administrator of a grant or cooperative agreement, as described in 32 CFR 22.715. Responsibilities for TIAs include: ( a ) Advising agreements officers before they award TIAs on how to establish award terms and conditions that better meet research programmatic needs, facilitate effective post-award administration, and ensure good stewardship of Federal funds.
( b ) Participating as the business partner to the DoD program official to ensure the Government's substantial involvement in the research project. This may involve attendance with program officials at kickoff meetings or post-award conferences with recipients. It also may involve attendance at the consortium management's periodic meetings to review technical progress, financial status, and future program plans.
( c ) Tracking and processing of reports required by the award terms and conditions, including periodic business status reports, programmatic progress reports, and patent reports.
( d ) Handling payment requests and related matters. For a TIA using advance payments, that includes reviews of progress to verify that there is continued justification for advancing funds, as discussed in § 37.1105(b). For a TIA using milestone payments, it includes making any needed adjustments in future milestone payment amounts, as discussed in § 37.1105(c).
( e ) Coordinating audit requests and reviewing audit reports for both single audits of participants' systems and any award-specific audits that may be needed, as discussed in §§ 37.1115 and 37.1120.
( f ) Responding, after coordination with program officials, to recipient requests for permission to sell or exclusively license intellectual property to entities that do not agree to manufacture substantially in the United States, as described in § 37.875(b). Before you grant approval for any technology, you must secure assurance that the Government will be able to use the technology (*e.g.,* a reasonable license for Government use, if the recipient is selling the technology) or seek reimbursement of the Government's investments.
[68 FR 47160, Aug. 7, 2003, as amended at 85 FR 51246, Aug. 19, 2020]
Exhibit
31.1





SECTION
302 CERTIFICATION





I,
James Anderson, certify that:





1. I have
reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Matrix Energy Services Corp.,
Inc.;





2. Based
on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report.





3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual
report;





4.  I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange
Act Rules 12a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:








a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such controls and
procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared.





b)
      Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and
      procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the
      effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of
      the period covered by this quarterly report based on such evaluations;
      and





c)
      Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s
      internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
      business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter  that has
      materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
      registrant’s internal control over financial
  reporting.





5. I have
disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):





a)
      All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
      operation of internal controls over financial reporting which could
      adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize
      and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s
      auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls over financial
      reporting; and





b)
      Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal
      controls over financial reporting.








Date:
      November 3, 2008
            /s/James
      Anderson


James
Anderson


Chief
Executive Officer and


Principal
Accounting Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           1,444
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   61,559
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,012
<INVENTORY>                                     30,500
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 9,778
<PP&E>                                         206,304
<DEPRECIATION>                                  74,523
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 236,132
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           31,899
<BONDS>                                         57,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        13,326
<OTHER-SE>                                     116,909
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   236,132
<SALES>                                        227,802
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               227,802
<CGS>                                          169,506
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  198,488
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,468
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 27,846
<INCOME-TAX>                                    10,527
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             17,319
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                      (4,340)
<NET-INCOME>                                    12,979
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .98
        

</TABLE>
#### Maynard Allen JACOBSON, 13460-148, Petitioner, v. C. E. HARRIS, Warden, U. S. Penitentiary, Marion, Illinois, United States Board of Parole, and Donald W. Kostohryz, Chief United States Probation Officer, Respondents.

No. 4-70 Civ. 241.

United States District Court, D. Minnesota, Third Division.

June 15, 1970.

*1037ORDER

DEVITT, Chief Judge.

Petitioner, an inmate of the Federal Penitentiary at Marion, Illinois, is seeking release from confinement. He claims he was denied procedural rights under rules promulgated by the United States Board of Parole. He states he was denied a parole revocation hearing.

Petitioner was convicted in this District on April 1, 1965 of violating the Dyer Act and was sentenced to 4 years imprisonment under 4208(a) (2). He appealed to the Court of Appeals. The Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed. Jacobson v. United States, 356 F.2d 685 (8th Cir. 1966).

It appears that the Petitioner was paroled by the Parole Board and later violated the terms of his parole. The Board terminated his parole. Hence his present incarceration. He petitions for a writ of habeas corpus.

 Because he is incarcerated in a District other than the District of Minnesota this Court is without authority to issue a writ of habeas corpus, 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241; and because he does not complain of the sentence imposed, this Court is without authority to entertain the petition when viewed as one under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255. It is not claimed that—

> “ * * * the sentence was imposed in violation of the Constitution or laws of the United States, or that the court was without jurisdiction to impose such sentence, or that the sentence was in excess of the maximum authorized by law, or is otherwise subject to collateral attack * * 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255.

See Allen v. United States, 327 F.2d 58 (5th Cir. 1964); United States v. Hock, 275 F.2d 726 (3d Cir. 1960); United States v. Walker, 117 F.Supp. 503 (S.D.N.Y.1953). Federal Practice and Procedure (Wright) § 596.

The Clerk is directed to file the petition without the prepayment of the filing fee, and the petition is dismissed.
UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C.  20549



FORM 6-K

REPORT OF FOREIGN PRIVATE ISSUER

PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-16 OR 15d-16

UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934



Dated September 20, 2006



Commission File Number: 001-14666



MITTAL STEEL COMPANY N.V.

(Translation of registrants name into English)



15th Floor, Hofplein 20

3032 AC Rotterdam

The Netherlands

(Address of principal executive offices)



Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports under cover Form 20-F or Form 40-F.



Form 20-F x Form 40-F o




Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1): _____



Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7): _____



Indicate by check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the information contained in this Form is also thereby furnishing the information to the Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.



Yes o No x




If Yes marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the registrant in connection with Rule 12g3-2(b):  82-________







| |  | 
| |  | 





---







On September 20, 2006 Mittal Steel Company N.V. issued the press release attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1, which is incorporated herein by reference.



Exhibit List



|Exhibit No.  | Description                                                                                                            | 
|------------ | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|Exhibit 99.1 | Press release dated September 20, 2006, announcing Arcelor Mittals statement regarding a mine accident in Kazakhstan.

















| |  | 
| |  | 





---







SIGNATURES



Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.



Date: September 20, 2006





| | By: | /s/ Henk Scheffer       
| | --- | ------------------------
| |     | Name: Henk Scheffer     
| |     | Title: Company Secretary





| |  | 
| |  | 





---







Exhibit Index



|Exhibit No.  | Description                                                                                                            | 
|------------ | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|Exhibit 99.1 | Press release dated September 20, 2006, announcing Arcelor Mittals statement regarding a mine accident in Kazakhstan.









| |  | 
| |  |
Order filed June 23, 2015

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 15

- 00029

- CV

____________ ERIC BRANDON ROSENBE RG , Appellant

V.
SUSAN EVELYN ENGELKI NG, Appellee

On Appeal from the 201st District Court

Travis County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. D

- 1

- FM

- 11

- 000804



### O R D E R
Appellant’ s brief was due May 27, 2015

. No brief or motion for extension of
time has been filed.
Unless appellant files a brief with this court on or before July 8, 2015 , the court will dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).

PER CURIAM
1

Eric H. Holder, Jr. has been appointed to serve as Attorney General of the

United States, and is substituted as respondent pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate

Procedure 43(c).

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 08-2311

___________

Mudji Widarjono, *

*

Petitioner, *

* Petition for Review of

v. * an Order of the Board

* of Immigration Appeals.

Eric H. Holder, Jr.,1

 Attorney General *

of the United States, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Respondent. *

___________

Submitted: December 2, 2009

Filed: Decemer 7, 2009

___________

Before WOLLMAN, RILEY, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

An immigration judge previously found that Mudji Widarjono, a native and

citizen of Indonesia, was removable but should be granted asylum. In September

2006, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) reversed the grant of asylum and

remanded to the IJ for a determination of the country of removal. In December 2006,

the IJ designated the country of removal, and Widarjono appealed to the BIA,
-2-

challenging statements that the IJ had made on remand about relief under the

Convention Against Torture, and taking issue with the BIA’s reversal of the grant of

asylum. In May 2008 the BIA dismissed the appeal as being outside the scope of the

remand and untimely as to the September 2006 order. Widarjono now petitions for

review of the May 2008 order, and we dismiss the petition. 

Widarjono does not challenge the substance of the BIA’s May 2008 order, but

instead challenges its September 2006 order. It is too late for him to do so. The

September 2006 order was the final order of removal in this case, because the finding

of removability that the IJ made at the time that it granted asylum became effective

when the BIA reversed the grant of asylum. Accordingly, Widarjono’s June 2008

petition is untimely. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(1) (“petition for review must be filed not

later than 30 days after the date of the final order of removal”); 8 C.F.R. § 1241.1(a)

(order of removal by IJ becomes final upon dismissal of appeal by BIA); SolanoChicas v. Gonzalez, 440 F.3d 1050, 1053-54 (8th Cir. 2006) (once IJ has made finding

of removability, if BIA reverses IJ’s grant of discretionary relief from removal, BIA

is in essence giving effect to IJ’s order of removal); see also Lazo v. Gonzales, 462

F.3d 53, 54 (2d Cir. 2006) (per curiam) (statutory requirement of order of removal is

satisfied when IJ either orders removal or concludes alien is removable); Del Pilar v.

U.S. Attorney General, 326 F.3d 1154, 1156-57 (11th Cir. 2003) (per curiam) (BIA’s

order reversing IJ’s grant of discretionary relief from removal amounted to final

removal order even when BIA remanded case to IJ to designate country of removal,

because there was nothing left for alien to appeal). 

Accordingly, we dismiss the petition and deny the pending motion as moot.

______________________________
**Exhibit 32.2**

**Section 1350 Certification of the**

**Chief Financial Officer**

I, Robert J. Ben the Chief Financial Officer of CobraElectronics Corporation, certify that (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Cobra Electronics Corporation for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2011 (the “Form 10-Q”) fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of CobraElectronics Corporation and its subsidiaries.
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

Functional Statements > Office of the General Counsel

## Immediate Office of the General Counsel Functional Statement

The General Counsel performs the functions described in Section I and supervises the work of his or her own special assistants and the three subcomponent organization supervisors.  Staff in the General Counsel's Immediate Office handle special assignments for the General Counsel and provide support services for the Office.  Staff performing executive management functions provide support to the Office of the General Counsel and to the Office of Legislation and Congressional Affairs.  The staff is supervised by an Administrative Officer who is responsible for managing and coordinating personnel activities including employee recruitment, selection, and promotion; provides advice, information, and assistance to staff in assigned offices on employee relations matters including grievances, employee discipline and related matters; plans and develops the budget for assigned offices, including preparing fiscal operating plans, analyses, and reports; approves expenditures and obligations, and secures contracts for support services and equipment.  Staff develop, recommend, and implement policies and procedures in the areas of procurement, space management, and property controls; maintains and directs an automated tracking and logging system for OGC correspondence and other incoming and outgoing materials; directs the design, installation, and maintenance of information technology systems, maintains the OGC Law Library, and the renewal of subscriptions.

Top

----

 

 Printable view

## How Do I Find...

          - Student loans, forgiveness
          - Higher Education Rulemaking
          - College accreditation
          - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
          - FERPA
          - FAFSA
          - 1098, tax forms

More >

## Information About...

          - Elevating Teaching
          - Early Learning
          - Engage Every Student
          - Unlocking Career Success
          - Cybersecurity

 

----

*Our mission*

Student Loans
Repaying LoansDefaulted LoansLoan ForgivenessLoan Servicers

Grants & Programs
Apply for Pell GrantsGrants ForecastApply for a Grant

Laws & Guidance
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)FERPACivil RightsNew IDEA Website

Data & Research
Education StatisticsPostsecondary Education DataED Data ExpressNation's Report CardWhat Works ClearinghouseOpen Data PlatformCOVID Relief Data

About Us
Contact UsED OfficesJobsPress ReleasesFAQsRecursos en españolBudget, PerformancePrivacy Program

----

          - Notices
          - FOIA
          - Privacy Policy
          - Accessibility
          - Security
          - Information quality
          - Inspector General
          - Whitehouse.gov
          - USA.gov
          - Benefits.gov
          - Regulations.gov
          - vote.gov