alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 770.46 Violations. ( a ) Any person entering or remaining on Naval Submarine Base New London, without the consent of the Commanding Officer, Naval Submarine Base New London or his authorized representative, shall be subject to the penalties prescribed in 18 U.S.C. 1382, which provides in pertinent part: Whoever, within the jurisdiction of the United States, goes upon any military, naval . . . reservation, post, fort, arsenal, yard, station, or installation, for any purpose prohibited by law or lawful regulation . . . shall be fined not more than $500 or imprisoned not more than six months or both.
( b ) Moreover, any person who willfully violates this subpart is subject to a fine not to exceed $5000 or imprisonment for not more than one (1) year or both as provided in 50 U.S.C. 797.
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N

NO. 03-10-00289- CR

Sam uel V. Harris, Appellant

v. The State of Texas, App ellee

F ROM TH E DISTRI CT COURT O F H AY S CO UNTY, 22ND J UDICIAL DI STRICT NO. CR-08 -89 8, H ONO RAB LE JACK H . RO B ISO N, JUDGE P RESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
Samuel V. Har

ris seeks to appea l a judgme nt of conviction for ag g ravated robber y . The trial court has cer

tified that: (1) this is a plea barg ain case and Har ris has no rig ht of appea l, and (2) Har ris waived the right of appea l. The appea l is dismiss ed. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a) (2), (d).

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ J an P. Patterson, J ustice Be fore J ustices Patterson, Waldrop and H enson Dismissed for Want of J urisdiction Filed: Jul y

13, 2010 Do Not Publish
###### Editorial Note on Part 724

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 724 appear at 65 FR 62616, Oct. 19, 2000.

#### § 724.121 Decisional document.

The written recordation of the applicant's summary of service, the issue or issues presented together with any evidence offered in support of the application, the NDRB's response to the issue or issues, the votes of the members of the panel, and any recommendations or responses by the President of the NDRB or the Secretarial Reviewing Authority (SRA). The decisional document is promulgated by the “en bloc letter”.
### §415a. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, from act June 16, 1938, ch. 464, title I, 52 Stat. 739, known as the Department of Agriculture Appropriation Act, 1939, related to sale of practical forms of grades of wool and mohair. See section 2247a of this title. Similar provisions were contained in the following prior appropriation acts:

June 29, 1937, ch. 404, title I, 50 Stat. 424.

June 4, 1936, ch. 489, title I, 49 Stat. 1450.

May 17, 1935, ch. 131, title I, 49 Stat. 275.

Mar. 26, 1934, ch. 89, 48 Stat. 493.

Mar. 3, 1933, ch. 203, 47 Stat. 1458.

July 7, 1932, ch. 443, 47 Stat. 636.

Feb. 23, 1931, ch. 278, 46 Stat. 1268.

May 27, 1930, ch. 341, 46 Stat. 418.

Feb. 16, 1929, ch. 227, 45 Stat. 1212.

May 16, 1928, ch. 572, 45 Stat. 561.

Jan. 18, 1927, ch. 39, 44 Stat. 997.
Exhibit 31.3
**CERTIFICATIONS**
I, David C. Swanson, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of R.H.Donnelley Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respectto the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations andcash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presentedin this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
a.)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls or procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared; b.)  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered bythis report based on such evaluation; c.)  disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred duringthe registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and
5 The registrant’s other certifying officers and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming equivalent functions):
a.)  all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses inthe design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and b.)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date: August 9, 2004 By:  /s/ David C. Swanson    David C. Swanson    President and Chief Executive Officer  
74
```

EXHIBIT 32.2
------------

                Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted
                 Pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Paul M. Joeckel, the Secretary/Vice President Operations of Eagle Exploration
Company, (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)  the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the fiscal  quarter
     ended June 30, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the  requirements of
     Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
     78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)  the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: August 14, 2003

                                          /s/  Paul M. Joeckel
                                          Name: Paul M. Joeckel
                                          Title: Secretary/Vice President Operations
```
ORGANIZATIONAL CHART: OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES

OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES

Executive Office Communications and 

Customer Services Team

Policy and Planning Staff

Special Institutions

Office of Special Education Programs Rehabilitation Services Administration
#### Edwin Maldonado, Plaintiff, v C.L.-M.I. Properties, Inc., et al., Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs-Appellants. Four of a Kind Contracting, Inc., et al., Third-Party Defendants; Sirius American Insurance Company, Defendant and Third-Party Defendant-Respondent.

[835 NYS2d 335]—

*823In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, and a third-party action for a judgment declaring that the third-party defendant, Sirius American Insurance Company, is obligated to defend and indemnify the third-party plaintiffs in the main action, the defendants third-party plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Doyle, J.), dated February 9, 2006, which denied their motion for summary judgment declaring that Sirius American Insurance Company is obligated to defend and indemnify them in the main action.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

On their motion for summary judgment, the defendants and third-party plaintiffs (hereinafter the third-party plaintiffs) failed to establish that the disclaimer letter of their insurer, the defendant and third-party defendant (hereinafter the insurer), was ineffective. The letter apprised the third-party plaintiffs that coverage was being disclaimed on the ground of untimely notice of the occurrence by the insured, Home Magician, Inc. (hereinafter the insured), in violation of the policy terms and conditions. The third-party plaintiffs’ assertion that the letter incorrectly identified a witness to the accident as an employee of the insured does not change the basis for the disclaimer, which was clearly stated as late notice by the insured *(see Abreu v Huang,*300 AD2d 420 [2002]).

Moreover, the third-party plaintiffs failed to establish that the insurer improperly disclaimed as against the plaintiff in the main action. An injured person has an independent right to give notice to an insurer, and is not to be charged vicariously with an insured’s delay *(see Becker v Colonial Coop. Ins. Co.,*24 AD3d 702 [2005]; *Lauritano v American Fid. Fire Ins. Co.,*3 AD2d 564 [1957], *affd*4 NY2d 1028 [1958]). However, where an injured party fails to exercise the independent right to notify an insurer of the occurrence, a disclaimer issued to an insured for failure to satisfy the notice requirement of the policy will be effective as against the injured party as well *(see Viggiano v Encompass Ins. Company/Fireman’s Ins. Co. of Newark, N.J.,*6 AD3d 695 [2004]). In this case, there is no evidence that the plaintiff ever gave notice to the insurer, and the insurer’s disclaimer also specified the plaintiffs failure to provide timely notice as a separate ground for disclaiming coverage in the main action.

Thus, the third-party plaintiffs failed to establish their entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, and the Supreme Court properly denied their motion. Miller, J.P., Ritter, Covello and McCarthy, JJ., concur.
May 9, 1977.

M. P. No. 76-231.

#### In re Robert Bryant McKay.

*William F. Reilly,*Public Defender, *Barbara Hurst, John A. MacFadyen III,*Asst. Public Defenders, for petitioner.

Petitioner’s motion to withdraw his petition for habeas corpus is granted.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of FieldPoint Petroleum Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ray Reaves, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  _/s/Ray Reaves______ Ray Reaves Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer March 31, 2008
Exhibit 10.1
  
   Compensation Program
  Incentive Compensation:
   EMS Performance Bonus:
 st st
 Stock Options:




---



##### 



Sign On Bonus:
  Relocation:
  Benefits:
  Offer Conditions:
 eScreen ePassport
  Defense & Space (D&S) Employment:
  1.
    
    U.S. Birth Certificate2.
    
    Certificate of Naturalization3.
    
    A current or expired U.S. passport4.
    
    A record of military Processing-Armed forces of the United States (DD Form 1966)
indicating U.S. citizenship
 Security Clearance:
  Acceptance:
   2




---



##### 



EMS Technologies, Inc.
 /s/ Matthew Carlomagno
 
  Accepted By:

    
    /s/ Maion H. Van Fosson
    
    Date: August 3, 2010Start Date:

    
    
    August 23, 2010
  3




---



##### 



Schedule A
 Sign On Bonus:
    Schedule B:
 Relocation
     4
#### BRYANT v. HOGARTH

No. 435P97

Case below: 127 N.C.App. 79

Petition by plaintiffs for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 6 November 1997.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 Panhandle Royalty Company
5400 North Grand Blvd. Suite #210
Oklahoma City, OK 73112 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
REGARDING PERIODIC REPORT CONTAINING
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS I, H W Peace II, Chief Executive Officer of Panhandle Royalty
Company, (the Company), in compliance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, hereby certify in connection with the Companys Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the period that ended September 30, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) that:  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in this Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company. /s/ HW Peace IIHW Peace IIPresident &Chief Executive Officer
 December 17, 2004 (45)
EXHIBIT 31

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a))

I,
Bruce Reimer, certify that:

|      |  |                  |  |                                                      
|----- |  | ---------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------
|Date: |  | February 9, 2009 |  | /s/ BRUCE REIMER Bruce Reimer Chief Executive Officer

---



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a))

I,
Daniel P. Gorey, certify that:

|      |  |                  |  |                                                                                                    
|----- |  | ---------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: |  | February 9, 2009 |  | /s/ DANIEL P. GOREY Daniel P. Gorey Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

---



QuickLinks
**Exhibit(32)(b)**

Certification Pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As AdoptedPursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with theQuarterly Report of The Empire District Electric Company (the “Company”) onForm 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Gregory A. Knapp, asChief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

(1) The Reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| **By**                                                       | **/s/  Gregory A. Knapp** | ** ** |
|--------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------|------------|
| Name: Gregory A. Knapp                                       |
| Title: Vice President - Finance and Chief Financial  Officer |
|                                                         |                      |
| Date: May 9, 2007                                            |
|                                                              |                           |            |  |

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 or other document authenticating,acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed formwithin the electronic version of this written statement required by Section906, has been provided to The Empire District Electric Company and will beretained by The Empire District Electric Company and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

----
No. 761.

#### Pennsylvania Railroad Company *v.*Naam Looze Vennoot Schap, etc.

March 29, 1920.

*Mr. Frederic D. McKenney*and. *Mr. Shirley Carter*for petitioner.

*Mr. Charles R. Hickox*and *Mr. John M. Woolsey*for respondent.

Petition for a writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _
Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 5 A2 29 9 . J OHNNY MORGAN v . THE STATE.

Th e ab o ve ap p eal was d ock et ed i n t h i s Co u rt o n Au g u st 1 0, 20 1 5

. Pu rs u an t to

t h e Ru l es o f t h i s Co u rt , ap p el l an t ’ s en u m e r a t i o n o f erro rs an d b ri ef were d u e o n Au g u s t 3 0 , 2 0 1 5 . See Co u rt o f Ap peal s Ru l e 2 3

. Ap p el l an t was o rd ered t o fi l e o n Sep t em b er 2 4
, 20 1 5

. Th ereaft er, o n Oct o b er 5
, 20 1 5
, ap p el l an t was g ran ted an ex t en s i o n o f ti m e cau s i ng h i s b ri ef t o b e d u e o n o r b efo re Oct o b er 2 3 , 2 01 5

. It ap p eari n g ap p el lan t ’ s b ri ef an d en u m erat i o n o f erro rs h av e n o t been fi l ed as

o f t h e d at e o f t hi s o rd er, i t i s h ereb y o rd ered th is ap p eal b e DISM ISSED. See Co u rt

o f Ap peal s Ru les 7 an d 1 3.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia C le r k ’ s O f f i c e , A t la n t a ,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r t i f y t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t
h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 11/03/2015 November 03, 2015
# FORM 6-K

SECURITIES
  AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington,
  D.C. 20549

# Report of
  Foreign Issuer

# Pursuant
  to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16 of

# Securities
  Exchange Act of 1934

For the month
  of September 2004

ABBEY NATIONAL
  PLC 
  (Translation of registrants name into English)

Abbey National
  House, 2 Triton Square, Regent's Place
London NW1 3AN, England   
   (Address of principal executive offices)

|Indicate
      by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports under
      cover Form 20-F or Form 40-F.
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Form 20-F . . . .X. . . . Form 40-F . . . . . . . . Indicate
        by check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the information contained
        in this Form is also thereby furnishing the information to the Commission
        pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.


Yes
  . . . . . . . No . . .X. . . .

---

**Abbey National plc
13 September 2004**

Issued: 13 September 2004

**Rule 2.10 Announcement – Relevant Securities in Issue**

In accordance with Rule 2.10 of the City Code on Takeovers and Mergers, Abbey National plc (“Abbey”) confirms that, as at close of business on 10th September 2004, it had in issue 1,476,934,290 including those represented by ADSs) ordinary shares of 10 pence each (“Abbey Shares”).

The International Securities Identification Number for the Abbey Shares is GB0000044551 and for the American Depositary Shares of Abbey is US0029201060.

Each American Depositary Share of Abbey represents two Abbey Shares.

Gail McGrath
Secretariat Assistant
Tel: 0207 756 4772



The directors of Abbey National plc accept responsibility for the information contained in this announcement and confirm that, to the best of their knowledge and belief (having taken all reasonable care to ensure that such is the case), the information contained in this announcement is in accordance with the facts and does not omit anything likely to affect the import of such information.

---

# SIGNATURES

Pursuant
  to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has
  duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto
  duly authorized.

|                        |  | **ABBEY NATIONAL PLC**                
|----------------------- |  | --------------------------------------
|Date: 13 September 2004 |  | **By: /s/


Karen Carson**            
|                        |  | ****Karen Carson **Abbey Secretariat**
Letter Amendment to Loan and Security Agreement dated March 29, 2006



 Exhibit 10.61 
 

 
 Peter L. Davis 
 Senior Vice
President 
 Middle Market 
 March 29, 2006 
 Mark LeFever, CFO 
 Resorts International Hotel, Inc 
 1133 Boardwalk 
 Atlantic City, NJ 08401 
 Dear Mark, 
 I am pleased to inform you that the bank as consented to your
request for covenant changes for sections 6.8(a), 6.8(b), 6.8(c) under The Third Amendment to the Loan and Security Agreement for the net worth, interest coverage and trailing 12 month EBITDA tests for the 12/31/05, 3/31/06, and 6/30/06 covenant
test dates under the current Loan and Security Agreement. 
 Pursuant to your request we have agreed to amend and replace the existing financial covenants of
the above reference section of the Agreement as follow: 
  

									
	 Section
	 	 Test
	 	 12/31/05
	 	 3/31/06
	 	 6/30/06

	6.8(a)	 	Net Worth	 	$68,000,000	 	$65,000,000	 	$65,000,000
	6.8(b)	 	Interest Coverage	 	1.25:1	 	1.10:1	 	1.10:1
	6.8(c)	 	EBITDA	 	$30,000,000	 	$29,000,000	 	$28,000,000

 Please note that the net work requirements agreed to above are absolute and fixed dollar amounts and are not
subject to automatic adjustments as originally contemplated in section 6.8(a) of the Third Amendment to the Credit Agreement. 
 In consideration for
making the above changes to the Agreement, the bank is charging an Amendment Fee of $50,000. Please execute the attached copy of this letter and return to my attention with the Amendment Fee. 
  

							
	Sincerely,	 		 	Agreed and Accepted	 	 



			
	

	 		 	


	Peter L. Davis	 		 	Mark Lefever, CFO	 	

 One Commerce Square 
 2005 Market Street; 2nd Floor 
 Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103 
 215-282-4433 
 Fax: 215-282-4032 
 peter_davis@yesbank.com
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL

THE INSPECTOR GENERAL

MEMORANDUM

TO: Special Agent in Charge/Investigation, Boston/New York OIG Region

Special Agent in Charge/Investigation, Washington/Philadelphia OIG Region 

Special Agent in Charge/Investigation, Atlanta OIG Region ◄▬▬

Special Agent in Charge/Investigation, Chicago OIG Region 

Special Agent in Charge/Investigation, Long Beach OIG Office

FROM: Assistant Inspector General for Investigation 

SUBJECT: Redelegation of Authority to Sign and Issue Inspector General's Subpoenas

I. DELEGATION

Under the authority vested in me by a delegation from the Inspector General, 

Delegation Control Number EF/EFI/148, certified July 23, 2004, I hereby delegate to 

you and to anyone serving for you in an acting capacity, the authority under Section 6 

(a) (4) of the Inspector General Act of 1978, as amended, to issue Inspector General's 

subpoenas in furtherance of the duties and functions of the Office of Inspector General.

Unless otherwise noted in future delegations of authority, amendments to the 

authorities delegated herein are included within the scope of this delegation.

II. RESERVATIONS

None.

III. REDELEGATION

This authority may not be redelegated.
Page 2 - Redelegation of Authority to Sign and Issue IG's Administrative Subpoenas 

IV. CERTIFICATION AND EFFECTIVE DATE

This delegation is effective upon certification by the Department's Delegation Control 

Officer and supersedes all previous delegations of this authority. I hereby ratify actions 

within the scope of this delegation taken by the addressees prior to certification of this 

delegation.

 ____________/s/__________

 William D. Hamel

OGC Clearance and Date: /s/ David Berthiaume, 12/22/08

Certified Date: 12/31/2008

Departmental Delegations Control Officer: /s/ Naty G. Beetle

Control Number: EFI/EFD4I/179