alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 755.5 Complaint by the injured party and investigation. ( a ) A claim shall contain a statement setting forth the amount of the claim, the facts and circumstances surrounding the claim and any other information that will assist in the investigation and resolution of the matter. When there is more than one complaint resulting from a single incident, each claimant must file a claim separately and individually. The claim shall be personally signed by the claimant or his duly authorized representative or agent.
( b ) Where the claim alleges misconduct by members of the command, a commanding officer to whom the claim is submitted shall convene an investigation under this Manual to inquire into the matter. Where a complaint is received by a commanding officer to whose command the alleged offenders do not report, he shall forward the claim and other pertinent information about the matter to the member's commanding officer who will convene an investigation into the incident. Where the command of the alleged offenders cannot be determined, the claim and supporting materials shall be forwarded to the Chief of Naval Personnel or the Commandant of the Marine Corps, as appropriate, for action.
( c ) The investigation shall inquire into the circumstances surrounding the claim, gather all relevant information about the matter (answering the who, what, where, when, why, and how questions) and make findings and opinions, as appropriate, about the validity of the claim under Article 139, UCMJ, and these regulations. The investigation shall determine the amount of damage suffered by the property owner.
( d ) The investigation shall make recommendations about the amount to be assessed against the pay of the responsible parties. If more than one person is found responsible, recommendations shall be made about the assessments against all individuals.
###### Editorial Note on Part 724

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 724 appear at 65 FR 62616, Oct. 19, 2000.

#### § 724.123 Complainant.

A former member of the Armed Forces (or the former member's counsel) who submits a complaint under 32 CFR part 70 with respect to the decisional document issued in the former member's own case; or a former member of the Armed Forces (or the former member's counsel) who submits a complaint under reference (b) stating that correction of the decisional document will assist the former member in preparing for an administrative or judicial proceeding in which the former member's own discharge will be at issue.
### RECEIVED EPA REGION Ill 

## OCT 03 2011 NPDES ENFORCEMENTBRANC I certify that Clairton Municipal Authority- Clairton Sewage Treat 

### fii 42) which operates under NPDES PermitNo. PA0026824 will not accept any oil and gas exploration and/or production wastewaters at this facility. Forthe purpose ofthis certification, oil and gas exploration and/orproduction wastewaters includes, but is not limited to: ground water produced from coal seams, shale formation ground water, well drilling fluids, fracturing fluids, shale gas produced water, waterproduced from conventional and unconventional wells, pit water, containment pond water, and storage pond water. IfClairton Municipal Authority - Clairton Sewage TreatmentPlant desires to accept oil and gas exploration and/orproduction wastewater after signingthis certification, Clairton Municipal Authority - Clairton Sewage Treatment Plant will, prior to acceptance: notify EPA Region III and PADEP ofits intent, take all actions necessary to comply with the Clean Water Act (CWA) and receive all necessary approvals from EPA and PADEP. As a company official, I certify that this statement is true and correct. I am aware that violations ofCW A are punishable under the civil and criminal provisions ofSection 309 ofthe CW A, which provide for the assessment ofpenalties, injunctive reliefand imprisonment. H

(Title)

(Date)
###### Editorial Note on Part 724

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 724 appear at 65 FR 62616, Oct. 19, 2000.

#### § 724.901 Objective of discharge review.

The objective of a discharge review is ot examine the propriety and equity of the applicant's discharge and to effect changes, if necessary. The standards of the review and the underlying factors which aid in determining whether the standards are met shall be consistent with historical criteria for determining honorable service. No factors shall be established that require automatic change or denial of a change in a discharge. Neither the NDRB nor the Secretary of the Navy shall be bound by any methodology of weighting of the factors in reaching a determination. In each case, the NDRB shall give full, fair, and impartial consideration to all applicable factors before reaching a decision. An applicant may not receive a less favorable discharge than that issued at the time of separation. This does not preclude correction of clerical errors.
### SUBCHAPTER II—ENVIRONMENTAL PESTICIDE CONTROL
§ 507.11 Possession and wear. ( a ) The wearing of any decoration, service medal, badge, service ribbon, lapel button, or insignia that the Army has prescribed or authorized by any person not properly authorized to wear such device or the use of any decoration, service medal, badge, service ribbon, lapel button, or insignia to misrepresent the identification or status of the person by whom such is worn is prohibited. Any person who violates this paragraph (a) is subject to punishment as prescribed in the statutes referred to in § 507.5.
( b ) Mere possession by a person of any of the articles prescribed in § 507.13 (except identification cards) is authorized, provided that such possession is not used to defraud or misrepresent the identification or status of the individual concerned.
( c ) Articles specified in § 507.13, or any distinctive parts (including suspension ribbons and service ribbons) or colorable imitations thereof, will not be used by any organization, society, or other group of persons without prior approval in writing by the Army Trademark Licensing Program as specified in § 507.10(b).
### SO2 **BART limit calculations for U BART limit calculations for U**  **BART limit calculations for U . S**  **. Steel facilities**  **Steel facilities Jiang,**  **Hongming Hongming**  **Hongming**

**( MPCA**  **) to:**  **Kathleen Dagostino 11/15/2012 11:59 AM**  **Cc: "Neuschler, Catherine (MPCA)"**  **History: This message has been forwarded.** 
**3 attachments**

**Assistance to FIP on USS SO2 data analysis.xlsx Assistance to FIP on USS SO2 data analysis.xlsx Minn**  **tac BART Supporting Data.xlsx tac BART Supporting Data.xlsx** 

**Keetac BART Supporting Data.xlsx**



### Kathleen:

As promised, attached are the three files, the last two of which may have been received at your end. Give me a call, if you need me to walk over these calculations. Thanks! - Hongming Jiang, Ph.D., P.E. Industrial Division Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 520 Lafayette Road North St. Paul, MN 55155-4194 (651)757-2467 (voice) (651)296-8717 (fax) hongming. jiang @state.mn.us For MPCA info, click at www.pca.state.mn.us
BayerMaterialSciencePUBLICGOPYSeptember9,2010BvCertifiedMaitTSCAConfidentialBusinesslnformationCenter(7407M)EPAEast-Room6428Attn:Section8(e)U.S.EnvironmentalProtectionAgency1200PennsylvaniaAvenue.N.W.Washington,DC20460Subject:TSCAgS(e)TestSubstance:CASRegistryNumber68650-79-3(amides,tall-oilfatty,N-13-gdimethylaminolpropyl)DearSirorMadam:BayerMaterialScienceLLC(the"Company")previouslysubmittedthefollowingstudysummariesfortheTestSubstance:l.SEHQ-O9-17540,submitredJunel,Z00g,2.submittedAugust10,2009,and3.submittedApril2g,2010(3srudies).TheCompanyisnowsubmittingthesummaryofanInherentBiodegradability:ModifiedMITITest(IfoftheTestSubstance,whichtheCompanyimports,processes,anddistributesintheUnitedStates.TheCompanyissubmittingthesedatainaccordancewithourunderstandingofEpA,sinterpretationoftherequirementsofTSCA$s(e)asexpressedinagencyguidance.However,theCompanyhasnotdeterminedwhetherthesedataactuallydiscloseu*u.täniiulriskofinjurytohealthortheenvironmentassociatedwiththechemicalsubstanceormixture.t7qzBProductSafety&RegulatoryAffairsandManagementSystemsBayerMaterialScienceLLCI00BayerRoadPittsburgh,PA15205-9741Phone:FAX:e-mail:llllllillIlllllllllllliliillilililll{l(ìCt000OI.lÈt,;gqrooooOoa8IsPleasecontactmeifyouhaveanyquestions.Sincerely,AttachmentPUBLICCOPYCOMPOUND:STUDYTITLE:PUBLICCOPYAstudywasperformedtoassesstheinherentbiodegradabilityoftheTestSubstance.ThestudywasconductedinaccordancewiththeOECDGuideline302C"InherentBiodegradability:ModifiedMITITest(ID"(1981)(basedonstandardoperatingproceduresforOECDGuideline30lF(L992)andtheCouncilRegulation(EC)No440/2008,methodC.4-D"ManometricRespirometryTest"(2008).AsolutionoftheTestSubstanceinamineralmediumwasinoculatedwith40%sludgeofeachoftwodifferentmunicipalsewagetreatmentplants(STP)and20%sludgeofanindustrialSTPandincubatedunderaerobicconditions.Duringthisperiod,degradationwasfollowedbycontinuousautomatedBODdeterminations.TestSubstanceshowed:47%odegradationafter7days70%odegradationafter14days90%odegradationafter21days97%odegradationafter28daysTherefore,theTestSubstanceisconsideredtobe"Inherentlybiodegradable"lWithinthetestperiodof28days,adegradationof97o/owasdetermined,andthissubstancewasclassifiedas"Inherentlybiodegradable".ThissubstanceisconsideredasmoderateforbiodegradationundertheEPA"ClassificationCriteriaforEnvironmentalFate".ThissubstanceishighlytoxictoDaphniaandalgaebasedonacutetoxicitytestingandmoderatelytoxictofishandbacteriabasedonacutetoxicitytesting(Daphnia-EC50:0.11mg/L-48hrs.;algae-IC50:0.53mglL-72hrs.;frsh-CL50-2.5mg/L-96hrs.;bacterial-EC50-2llmglL-3hrs.).Basedontypicaluses(additiveforuseintheproductionofpolyurethane;reactedinfinalproducts),wewouldnotexpectwidespreadexposure.Also,wearenotawareofpreviouslyunsuspecteddistributioninenvironmentalmediaorinformationthatwidespreadorsignificantexposuretohumansornonhumanorganismshasoccurredorthatthereisasubstantiallikelihoodthatsuchexposurewilloccur.CASRegistryNumber68650-79-3(amides,tall-oilfatty,.À/-[3-9dimethylaminolpropyl)InherentBiodegradability:ModifiedMITITest(IfComPanYSanft¡zed
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 15

- 00215

- CV
Rodolfo Rodriguez v. RG Options LLC
On Appeal from the County Court at Law No 4 of Hidalgo County , Texas

Trial Cause No. CL

- 14

- 0133

- D(2)

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered thi s cause on appeal, concludes the appeal should be DISMISSED . The Court orders the appeal DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion . Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appellant.
We further order this decision certified below for observance.
October 8, 2015
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

Functional Statements > Federal Student Aid

## Table of Contents

                - I. Mission and Responsibilities 
                - II. Organization
                - III. Order of Succession
                - IV. Functions and Responsibilities of FSA Components
                A. Immediate Office of the Chief Operating Officer
B. Office of Principal Deputy to the Chief Operating Officer
- B1. Acquisitions Directorate
- B2. Finance Directorate
- B3. Strategic Communications Directorate
- B4. Management Services Directorate
- B5. Enterprise Technology Directorate
C. NextGen FSA Program Office
D. Office of Student Experience and Aid Delivery (SEAD)
E. Office of Partner Participation and Oversight (PPO)
F. Office of Strategic Measures and Outcomes (SMO)
G. Office of Strategy, Innovation, and Transformation (SIT)

## Organizational Chart

FSA Org Chart (PDF, 112KB)

## Delegations of Authority

FSA Delegations of Authority may be found at https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/or/delegations/fsa.html

----

 

 Printable view

## How Do I Find...

          - Student loans, forgiveness
          - Higher Education Rulemaking
          - College accreditation
          - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
          - FERPA
          - FAFSA
          - 1098, tax forms

More >

## Information About...

          - Elevating Teaching
          - Early Learning
          - Engage Every Student
          - Unlocking Career Success
          - Cybersecurity

 

----

*Our mission*

Student Loans
Repaying LoansDefaulted LoansLoan ForgivenessLoan Servicers

Grants & Programs
Apply for Pell GrantsGrants ForecastApply for a Grant

Laws & Guidance
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)FERPACivil RightsNew IDEA Website

Data & Research
Education StatisticsPostsecondary Education DataED Data ExpressNation's Report CardWhat Works ClearinghouseOpen Data PlatformCOVID Relief Data

About Us
Contact UsED OfficesJobsPress ReleasesFAQsRecursos en españolBudget, PerformancePrivacy Program

----

          - Notices
          - FOIA
          - Privacy Policy
          - Accessibility
          - Security
          - Information quality
          - Inspector General
          - Whitehouse.gov
          - USA.gov
          - Benefits.gov
          - Regulations.gov
          - vote.gov
### §2704. Notice and hearing upon proposed orders

Whenever the Secretary has reason to believe that the issuance of an order will tend to effectuate the declared policy of this chapter, he shall give due notice and opportunity for hearing upon a proposed order. Such hearing may be requested and proposal for an order submitted by an organization certified pursuant to section 2715 of this title, or by any interested person affected by the provisions of this chapter, including the Secretary.

(Pub. L. 93–428, §5, Oct. 1, 1974, 88 Stat. 1173.)
Editorial Note on Part 842
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 842 appear at 81 FR 83688, Nov. 22, 2016.

§ 842.122 Claims not payable. A claim is not payable if it: ( a ) Is for use or depreciation of privately owned property, operated by CAP or its members on an Air Force noncombat mission, or other specified Air Force authorized mission.
( b ) Is for personal services or expenses incurred by CAP or its members while engaged in an Air Force noncombat mission, or other specified Air Force authorized mission.
( c ) Arises out of a CAP incident based solely on government ownership of property on loan to CAP.
( d ) Arises from a CAP activity not performed as a noncombat mission of the Air Force or as a specified Air Force authorized mission. These claims are sent to HQ CAP-USAF/JA for referral to CAP's private insurer, with a copy of the transmittal letter to AFLOA/JACC.
[55 FR 2809, Jan. 29, 1990. Redesignated at 81 FR 83700, 83701, Nov. 22, 2016]
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JULIO MONTES RAMIREZ,

Petitioner,

v.
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General,
Respondent. No. 15

- 72620

Agency No. A072

- 228

- 513

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

S ubmitted November 15, 2017 **

Before: CANBY, TROTT, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.
Julio Montes Ramirez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review

of the Department of H omeland Security’s (“DHS”) order reinstating his 2001

order of removal , and an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) determination that he did not

have a reasonable fear of persecution or torture

. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8

U.S.C. § 1252. Our review of DHS’ re instatement order is “limited to confirming

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 3 6

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

NOV 21 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 15

- 72620

the agency ’ s compliance wit h the reinstatement regulations
, ” and we review de

novo due process claims and questions of law. Garcia de Rincon v. DHS , 539 F.3d

1133, 11 36

- 3 7 (9th Cir. 2008) . We deny in part and dis miss in part the petition for

review.

Montes Ramirez has waived review of the IJ’s determination under 8 C.F.R.

§ 1208.31(a) that he did not have a reasonable fear of persecution or torture and

thus is not entitled to relief from his reinstated removal ord er. See Rizk v. Holder
, 629 F.3d 1083, 1091 n.3 (9th Cir. 2011) (issues not raised in an opening brief are

waived)

. The DHS did not err in issuing Montes Ramirez’s reinstatement order,

where the record shows, and Montes Ramirez does not contest, that he is an alien,

he was subject to a prior order of removal in 2001, and he illegally reentered the

United States subseque nt to that order. See Garcia de Rincon , 539 F.3d at 1137

(listing the three determinations underlying a reinstatement order that may be

reviewed) ; 8 U.S.C. § 1231(a)(5) (if the DHS “finds that an alien has reentered the

United States illegally after having been removed or having departed voluntarily,

under an order of removal, the prior order of removal is reinstated from its original
date”).3 15

- 72620

We lack jurisdiction to review Montes Ramirez’s collateral challenges to the

underlying 2001 removal order because t his petition for review is not timely as to

that decision, see 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(1), and Montes Ramirez has not established a

gross miscarriage of justice so as to permit review, see Garcia de Rincon , 539 F.3d

at 1138 ( while a petitioner is generally prev ented from collaterally attacking an

underlying removal order on constitutional due process grounds, § 1252(a)(2)(D)

permits some measure of review if t he petitioner can demonstrate a “ gross
miscarriage of justice” in the prior proceedings ).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part, DISMISSED in part

.
### §2542. Grandfather clause

Nothing in this chapter shall abridge the right of any person, or the successor in interest of the person, to reproduce or sell a variety developed and produced by such person more than one year prior to the effective filing date of an adverse application for a certificate of plant variety protection.

(Pub. L. 91–577, title III, §112, Dec. 24, 1970, 84 Stat. 1555; Pub. L. 103–349, §13(r), Oct. 6, 1994, 108 Stat. 3144.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1994—Pub. L. 103–349 substituted "the successor in interest of the person" for "his successor in interest".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1994 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 103–349 effective 180 days after Oct. 6, 1994, see section 15 of Pub. L. 103–349, set out as a note under section 2401 of this title.
Editorial Note on Part 842
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 842 appear at 81 FR 83688, Nov. 22, 2016.

§ 842.31 Definitions. ( a ) *Appeal.* A request by the claimant or claimant's authorized agent to reevaluate the final decision. A request for reconsideration and an appeal are the same for the purposes of this subpart.
( b ) *Final denial.* A letter mailed from the settlement authority to the claimant or authorized agent advising the claimant that the Air Force denies the claim. Final denial letters mailed from within the United States shall be sent by U.S. Mail, certified mail, return receipt requested.
( c ) *Noncombat activity.* Activity, other than combat, war or armed conflict, that is particularly military in character and has little parallel in the civilian community.
[55 FR 2809, Jan. 29, 1990. Redesignated and amended at 81 FR 83690, Nov. 22, 2016]
### §1966. Emergency Credit Revolving Fund utilization

The Secretary is authorized to utilize the revolving fund created by section 1148a 1 of title 12 (hereinafter in this subchapter referred to as the "Emergency Credit Revolving Fund") for carrying out the purposes of this subchapter.

(Pub. L. 87–128, title III, §326, Aug. 8, 1961, 75 Stat. 312.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 1148a of title 12, referred to in text, was repealed by Pub. L. 92–181, title V, §5.26(a), Dec. 10, 1971, 85 Stat. 624. See section 2252 of Title 12, Banks and Banking.

The Emergency Credit Revolving Fund, referred to in text, was abolished and its assets and liabilities transferred to the Agricultural Credit Insurance Fund by section 1929 of this title.

1 See References in Text note below.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

THE SECRETARY

MEMORANDUM

TO The Designated Agency Ethics Official 

Deputy Agency Ethics Officials

THROUGH: The General Counsel ←

FROM The Secretary

SUBJECT: Delegation of Authority

I. DELEGATION

Under the authority vested in me by Section 412 of the Department of Education 

Organization Act (DEOA), 20 U.S.C. Section 3472, Public Law 96-88, I hereby 

delegate to you the authority to serve as an "agency designee" under 5 CFR Section 

2635.204(g)(2),(3) and (6). 

Agency designees under this section of the Standards of Ethical Conduct make 

determinations regarding whether an employee's attendance at a widely attended 

event will further a Department interest, whether an employee may accept a gift to 

attend such an event if the sponsor of the event has interests that may be 

substantially affected by the performance or nonperformance of the employee's 

official duties (this determination must be made in writing), and whether the 

employee may accept an invitation permitting his or her spouse to accompany him 

or her to a widely attended event.

This delegation applies to determinations under these provisions regarding 

acceptance of free attendance for the Deputy Secretary, any other official serving in 

a position nominated by the President and confirmed by the Senate, the Chief of 

Staff, or any other employee whose first or second-line supervisor is the Deputy 

Secretary or the Secretary.

Unless otherwise noted in future delegations of authority, amendments to the 

authority delegated herein are included within the scope of this delegation.

II. RESERVATIONS

None.
Page 2 – Delegation of Authority

III. REDELEGATION

This authority may not be redelegated.

IV. CERTIFICATION AND EFFECTIVE DATE

This delegation is effective upon certification by the Department's Principal 

Delegation Control Officer.

 /s/ 

 Richard W. Riley

OGC Clearance and Date: /s/ R. Wexler, 4/27/93

Certified Date: 5/10/93

Departmental Delegations Control Officer: /s/ Wilma J. Hodo

Control No. EA/EG/63
#### § 200.2019 Post-hearing briefs.

The ALJ may require the parties to file post-hearing briefs. In any event, any party may file a post-hearing brief. The ALJ will fix the time for filing such briefs which are not to exceed 60 days from the date the parties receive the transcript of the hearing or, if applicable, the stipulated record. Such briefs may be accompanied by proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law. The ALJ may permit the parties to file reply briefs.
### §1738r. "Qualified debt" defined

As used in sections 1738o, 1738p, and 1738q of this title, the term "qualified debt" means any obligation, or portion of such obligation, of an eligible country to pay for purchases of United States agricultural commodities guaranteed by the Commodity Credit Corporation under export credit guarantee programs authorized pursuant to section 714c(f) of title 15 or section 1707a(b) 1 of this title—

(1) in which the Commodity Credit Corporation obtained a legal right or interest, as a result of assignment or subrogation, not later than September 1, 1992; and

(2) the payment of which obligation has been, not later than September 1, 1992, rescheduled in accordance with principles set forth in an Agreed Minute of the Paris Club.

Such term includes the obligation to pay any interest which was due or accrued not later than September 1, 1992, and unpaid as of the date of a debt sale pursuant to section 1738o of this title or a debt sale, reduction, or cancellation pursuant to section 1738p of this title (as the case may be).

(July 10, 1954, ch. 469, title VI, §619, as added Pub. L. 102–532, §2, Oct. 27, 1992, 106 Stat. 3511.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 1707a of this title, referred to in text, was repealed by Pub. L. 101–624, title XV, §1574, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 3702. See section 5621 et seq. of this title.

1 See References in Text note below.