alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.33

                              UREA SUPPLY CONTRACT
                              --------------------

This contract is made and entered into by and between  Shandong  Feida  Chemical
Technology Co., Ltd (hereinafter  referred to as Party A) and Shandong Bangsheng
Chemical  Co.,  Ltd  (hereinafter   referred  to  as  Party  B)  after  friendly
negotiation  based on the  principle of equality  and mutual  benefit on May 26,
2005. The specific terms and conditions are stipulated as follow:

I.    Commodity Name: Feida Brand carbamide urea; Monthly supply quantity: 1,000
      tons (for the moment); Price (including transportation expenses): RMB1,698
      (one thousand six hundred and ninety eight) yuan per ton, and  value-added
      tax invoices will be produced and delivered. And the price shall fluctuate
      in line with market conditions.

II.   Method of Payment

In principle,  the mode of payment  shall be cash on delivery;  the longest term
for delaying payment shall not be more than 30 days.

III.  Place of Delivery: The Warehouse for Triamine of Party B
IV.   If Party B fails to pay the  payment  for goods on time,  and as a result,
      Party  A can't  supply  the  goods  on  time,  Party  A  shall  assume  no
      liabilities;  if Party A fails to supply  the goods on time due to reasons
      of its own,  Party A shall  assume  all  responsibilities  shall take full
      liabilities.
V.    Party A warrants  that the quality of its  products is up to the  National
      Standard of the production under this contract.

VI.   The  period of  validity  of this  contract  is one full year.  VII.  This
      contract shall become effective upon the signing of both parties.

PARTY A:                PARTY B:

Shandong Feida Chemical Technology              Shandong Bangsheng Chemical Co.,
Co., Ltd                                        Ltd

/s/ Li Gang                                      /s/ Wang Jiaofang
----------------------------------              --------------------------------
AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE:                           AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE:
Exhibit 15.2 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration statements (Form S-8, No. 333-111310) pertaining to the Employees’ Stock Option Plans of Elron Electronic Industries Ltd. of our report dated March 14, 2005,with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Elbit Systems Ltd. for the year ended December 31, 2004, included in this Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2006. 

 

 

 /s/ Kost Forer Gabbay & Kasierer A member of Ernst & Young Global 

 

 

 

Haifa, Israel, June 25, 2007 

----
MEMORANDUM

TO: The General Counsel

FROM: The Secretary

SUBJECT: Delegation of Authority

I. DELEGATION

Under the authority vested in me by section 412 of the Department of Education 

Organization Act (Pub. L. No. 96-88, 20 U.S.C. § 3472), I hereby delegate to you, to your 

successor in function, and to anyone serving for you in an acting capacity or delegated the 

authority to perform the functions and duties of your position the authority to request from 

the Secretary of the Treasury exemption of payments from administrative offset under 31 

U.S.C. § 3716(c)(3)(B). A written request for exemption needs to provide justification for 

the exemption under standards prescribed by the Secretary of the Treasury, which are 

currently set forth at 31 CFR § 285.5(e)(7) and under standards prescribed by the Secretary 

of the Treasury and published on the Fiscal Service Web site (www.fiscal.treasury.gov/debt).

Unless otherwise specified in future delegations of authority, amendments to the authority 

delegated herein are included within the scope of the delegation.

II. RESERVATIONS 

None.

III. REDELEGATION

This authority may be redelegated.

IV. CERTIFICATION AND EFFECTIVE DATE

This delegation is effective upon certification by the Department’s Principal Delegation 

Control Officer.

_____________/s____________

Betsy DeVos

OGC Concurrence and Date: Michael Taylor; 10/17/2019

DOA: EA/EG/129

Departmental Delegations Control Officer: Jim Clemmens

Date Certified: 10/17/2019
#### § 1807.102 Application.

This part applies to all programs or activities conducted by the NACIC.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JULY 17, 2024

NO. 03-24-00361-CV

M. B., Appellant

v.

Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 466TH DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE, JUSTICES TRIANA AND KELLY

DISMISSED ON APPELLANT’S MOTION -- OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE

This is an appeal from the order signed by the trial court on May 23, 2024. Appellant has filed a 

motion to dismiss the appeal, and having considered the motion, the Court agrees that the motion 

should be granted. Therefore, the Court grants the motion and dismisses the appeal. Because 

appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
1.102 Statement of guiding principles for the Federal Acquisition System. ( a ) The vision for the Federal Acquisition System is to deliver on a timely basis the best value product or service to the customer, while maintaining the public's trust and fulfilling public policy objectives. Participants in the acquisition process should work together as a team and should be empowered to make decisions within their area of responsibility.
( b ) The Federal Acquisition System will— ( 1 ) Satisfy the customer in terms of cost, quality, and timeliness of the delivered product or service by, for example— ( i ) Maximizing the use of commercial products and commercial services;
( ii ) Using contractors who have a track record of successful past performance or who demonstrate a current superior ability to perform; and
( iii ) Promoting competition;
( 2 ) Minimize administrative operating costs;
( 3 ) Conduct business with integrity, fairness, and openness; and
( 4 ) Fulfill public policy objectives.
( c ) The Acquisition Team consists of all participants in Government acquisition including not only representatives of the technical, supply, and procurement communities but also the customers they serve, and the contractors who provide the products and services.
( d ) The role of each member of the Acquisition Team is to exercise personal initiative and sound business judgment in providing the best value product or service to meet the customer's needs. In exercising initiative, Government members of the Acquisition Team may assume if a specific strategy, practice, policy or procedure is in the best interests of the Government and is not addressed in the FAR nor prohibited by law (statute or case law), Executive order or other regulation, that the strategy, practice, policy or procedure is a permissible exercise of authority.
[60 FR 34733, July 3, 1995, as amended at 86 FR 61019, Nov. 4, 2021]
Amendment to Equity Line of Credit Agreement



 Exhibit 10.83 
 FIRST AMENDMENT TO 
 EQUITY LINE OF CREDIT AGREEMENT 
 This FIRST AMENDMENT TO EQUITY LINE OF CREDIT AGREEMENT (this “Amendment”) is made and entered into as of the 30th of March 2006
by and between Hopkins Capital Group II, LLC (the “Investor”) and BioDelivery Sciences International, Inc. (the “Company”). 
 WHEREAS, the Investor and the Company are parties to that certain Equity Line of Credit Agreement (the “Agreement”), dated as of September 3, 2004 and effective for all purposes as of
August 23, 2004; and 
 WHEREAS, in accordance with Section 8.1 of the Agreement, the Investor and the Company desire to
amend the Agreement as provided for herein. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, in accordance with the terms and provisions of the Agreement, and
intending legally to be bound, the Members hereby amend the Agreement as follows: 
 1. Defined Terms. All capitalized terms used but
not defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the Agreement. 
 2. Extension of Commitment Period. The Investor
and the Company hereby amend the Agreement to extend the Commitment Period by deleting the defined term “Commitment Period” appearing in the Agreement in its entirety and replacing it with the following: 
 “Commitment Period” shall mean the period commencing on the Effective Date and expiring on the earliest to occur of: (i) the date on
which the Investor shall have made payment of Advances pursuant to this Agreement in the aggregate amount of Four Million Dollars ($4,000,000) and (ii) December 31, 2006. 
 3. No Other Change. The Investor and the Company agree that except as modified by this Amendment, the Agreement remains unchanged and unmodified
in all respects and in full force and effect. 
 [Signature Page Follows] 
  

 1 








 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be duly executed and
delivered on their behalf as of the date first above written. 
  

			
	INVESTOR:
	
	HOPKINS CAPITAL GROUP II, LLC
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Francis E. O’Donnell, Jr.

	Name:	 	Francis E. O’Donnell, Jr.
	Title:	 	Manager
	
	COMPANY:
	
	BIODELIVERY SCIENCES INTERNATIONAL, INC.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Mark A. Sirgo

	Name:	 	Mark A. Sirgo
	Title:	 	President and Chief Executive Officer


  

 2
### §429. Repealed. Pub. L. 107–171, title X, §10418(a)(2), May 13, 2002, 116 Stat. 507

Section, act Sept. 21, 1944, ch. 412, title I, §101(b), 58 Stat. 734; Aug. 4, 1950, ch. 579, 64 Stat. 413, related to improvement of poultry, poultry products, and hatcheries.
----

|   | 1. | The                Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the period ended                December                31, 2006, (the "Annual Report"), fully complies with the requirements                of                Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of                1934, as                amended; |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The                information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all                material respects, the financial condition and results of operations                of                the Company. |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:                March 30, 2007                 |   |
|------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                 |   |
|                                                 |   |
| /s/                Paul O. Koether                   |   |
| Paul                O. Koether                       |   |
| Chairman                and Chief Executive Officer  |   |
|                                                 |   |
|                                                 |   |
| /s/                Bryan P. Healey                   |   |
| Bryan                P. Healey                       |   |
| Chief                Financial Officer and Secretary |   |

----
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 99.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Edward A. Tomechko, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer,
Treasurer and Secretary of The Elder-Beerman Stores Corp., (the "Company"), do
hereby certify in accordance with 18. U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

         The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended
         May 3, 2003 (the "Periodic Report") fully complies with the requirement
         of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
         U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and

         The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in
         all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation
         of the Company.

Dated: June 16, 2003
                                    /s/ Edward A. Tomechko
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                    Edward A. Tomechko
                                    Executive Vice President, Chief Financial
                                    Officer, Treasurer and Secretary

A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN
FURNISHED TO THE ELDER-BEERMAN STORES CORP. AND WILL BE RETAINED BY THE COMPANY
AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON
REQUEST.












                                       19
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsDevelopment of an autonomous video rendezvous and docking system, phase 3Field-of-view limitations proved troublesome. Higher resolution was required. Side thrusters were too weak. The strategy logic was improved and the Kalman filter was augmented to estimate target attitude and tumble rate. Two separate filters were used. The new filter estimates target attitude and angular momentum. The Newton-Raphson iteration improves image interpretation.Document ID19840009181Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsTietz, J. C.*(Martin Marietta Corp. Denver, CO, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 4, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1984Subject CategorySpacecraft Design, Testing And PerformanceReport/Patent NumberMCR-84-502NAS 1.26:170969NASA-CR-170969Accession Number84N17249Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS8-34679Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19840009181.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
AD Economic Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2011-0593 Directorate ID: 2011-SW-002-AD

Helicopter Model: Schweizer Model 269A, A-1, B, C, C-1, and TH-55 Helicopters

Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 585 Helicopters in the US Registry.

Reason: The actions of this AD are intended to prevent the strut and driveshaft separating from 

the helicopter and subsequent loss of control of the helicopter.

Costs:

Parts per Helicopter negligible

Labor per Helicopter

(0.5 work-hour x

$85/work-hour for the 

inspection)

(1.5 work-hour x 

$85/work-hour for the 

modification)

$43

$128

Other (Explain)

Total Cost per Helicopter $171

Total US Fleet Cost $100,035

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No ()

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No ()

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

Yes ( ) No ()

Project Engineer: Stephen Kowalski
### §§1707b to 1707d. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Sections were omitted as part of the complete revision of the Agricultural Trade Act of 1978 (Pub. L. 95–501) by Pub. L. 101–624, title XV, §1531, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 3668. See chapter 87 (§5601 et seq.) of this title.

Section 1707b, Pub. L. 95–501, title II, §201, Oct. 21, 1978, 92 Stat. 1686, provided for a program of deferred payment sales of agricultural commodities.

Section 1707c, Pub. L. 95–501, title II, §202, Oct. 21, 1978, 92 Stat. 1687, provided for a program of credit sales to People's Republic of China.

Section 1707d, Pub. L. 95–501, title II, §203, Oct. 21, 1978, 92 Stat. 1687, defined "agricultural commodity".
### §2009bb. Definitions

In this subchapter:

#### (1) Authority

The term "Authority" means the Northern Great Plains Regional Authority established by section 2009bb–1 of this title.

#### (2) Federal grant program

The term "Federal grant program" means a Federal grant program to provide assistance in—

(A) implementing the recommendations of the Northern Great Plains Rural Development Commission established by the Northern Great Plains Rural Development Act (7 U.S.C. 2661 note; Public Law 103–318);

(B) acquiring or developing land;

(C) constructing or equipping a highway, road, bridge, or facility;

(D) carrying out other economic development activities; or

(E) conducting research activities related to the activities described in subparagraphs (A) through (D).

#### (3) Indian tribe

The term "Indian tribe" has the meaning given the term in section 5304 of title 25.

#### (4) Region

The term "region" means the States of Iowa, Minnesota, Missouri (other than counties included in the Delta Regional Authority), Nebraska, North Dakota, and South Dakota.

(Pub. L. 87–128, title III, §383A, as added Pub. L. 107–171, title VI, §6028, May 13, 2002, 116 Stat. 375; amended Pub. L. 110–234, title VI, §6026(a), May 22, 2008, 122 Stat. 1177; Pub. L. 110–246, §4(a), title VI, §6026(a), June 18, 2008, 122 Stat. 1664, 1939.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Pub. L. 110–234 and Pub. L. 110–246 made identical amendments to this section. The amendments by Pub. L. 110–234 were repealed by section 4(a) of Pub. L. 110–246.

#### Amendments

2008—Par. (4). Pub. L. 110–246, §6026(a), inserted "Missouri (other than counties included in the Delta Regional Authority)," after "Minnesota,".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2008 Amendment

Amendment of this section and repeal of Pub. L. 110–234 by Pub. L. 110–246 effective May 22, 2008, the date of enactment of Pub. L. 110–234, see section 4 of Pub. L. 110–246, set out as an Effective Date note under section 8701 of this title.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Lorenzo Isaac, Appellant.

— Motion to dismiss appeal denied with leave to renew. Respondent is directed to serve moving papers on defendant.
### SUBCHAPTER V—SENIOR EXECUTIVE SERVICE
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

WASHINGTON DC 

SPA Rental, LLC, 

DBA MSI Aviation, 

Complainant, 

v. 

Somerset- Pulaski County 

Airport Board, 

Respondent. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

ORDER 

FAA Docket No. 16-13-02 

On November 6, 2015, counsel for Respondent, Somerset- Pulaski County Airport 

Board, filed a motion pursuant to 14 CFR § 16.19, requesting an extension of time to 

December 18,2015, to respond to Complainant's appeal of the Director's 

Determination, FAA Docket No. 16-13-02, dated September 1, 2015. 

Counsel advised that Respondent needs additional time to respond due to other 

commitments. Complainant does not appear to oppose this motion. 

Part 16 is intended to expedite the handling and disposition of airport-related 

complaints. See Rules of Practice for Federally-Assisted Airport Enforcement 

Proceedings Final Rule, 61 Fed. Reg. 53998 (Oct. 16, 1996). Extensions of time may 

be granted where necessary or appropriate for a fair and complete consideration of 

matters before the agency. See 14 CFR § 16.11(a). 

An extension of time is reasonable under the circumstances. Accordingly, Respondent 

is hereby granted an extension of time in which to file a reply to the appeal pursuant to 

CFR § 16.33(d). Respondent's Reply to the Appeal is now due on December 18, 2015. 

ct Director Date 

Office of Airport Compliance 

and Management Analysis 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on November ~~~~015, I caused to be emailed and placed in the 

United States mail (first class, postage paid) a true copy of the foregoing Order addressed to: 

Counsel for Complainant 

Konrad Kuczak 

130 West Second Street Suite 1010 

Dayton, OH 45402 

your _lawyer@sbcglobal.net 

Counsel for Respondent 

Rachel Owsley 

Bethany A. Breetz 

Stites & Harbison, PLLC 

400 West Market Street Suite 1800 

Louisville, KY 40202 

rowsley@stites.com 

b breetz@stites. com 

Copies hand-delivered to: 

FAA Part 16 Airport Proceedings Docket 

FAA Airport Compliance and Management Analysis, AC0-1 00 

(vi . I L~~l1/1. /~_/ Claudia Roberts 

Office of Airport Compliance and 

Management Analysis
§ 536.149 Identification of persons whose actions may generate liability. Claims resulting from the acts or omissions of members of the classes of persons listed below may be processed under this section. An ACO or a CPO authority will ask the Commander USARCS, for an advisory opinion prior to settling any claim where the person whose conduct generated the claim does not clearly fall within one of the following categories: ( a ) Civilian employees of NAFI activities whose salaries are paid from NAFs.
( b ) Active duty military personnel while performing off-duty part-time work for which they are compensated from NAFIs, not to include members who are acting in their capacity as an officer or other official of the NAFI.
( c ) Volunteers serving in an official capacity in furtherance of the business of the United States, limited to those categories set forth in DA Pam 27-162, paragraph 2-45d.
MEMORANDUM

TO: Deputy Assistant Secretary, Office of Human Resources

 (Chief Human Capital Officer) 

FROM: Assistant Secretary, Office of Finance and Operations

SUBJECT: Redelegation of Authority for Human Capital and Human Resources 

Management

 

I. DELEGATION

Under the authority vested in me by a delegation from the Secretary, delegation 

control number EA/EK/203, certified on July 22, 2019, I hereby delegate to you, 

to your successor in function as the Chief Human Capital Officer (CHCO), and to

anyone serving for you in an acting capacity or delegated to perform the functions 

and duties of the position of CHCO, the authority to perform all functions related 

to human capital and human resources management for the Department including, 

but not limited to, labor and employee relations, and training and development, 

consistent with your organization's functional statement in the Department's 

Mission and Organization Manual. 

II. RESERVATIONS

Unless otherwise noted in existing or future delegations of authority, the 

following are not delegated: 

A. the authority to sign Federal Register notices;

B. the authority to award contracts and discretionary grants; 

C. the authority to appoint, and fix compensation of, members of advisory 

councils; and 

D. unless otherwise provided by law, the authority to submit reports to 

Congress or the President. 
Page 2 - Delegation of Authority 

III. REDELEGATION

Subject to the reservations imposed by the U.S. Office of Personnel Management 

and those contained herein, you may redelegate any of the authorities delegated to 

you, and may authorize further redelegations. 

IV. CERTIFICATION AND EFFECTIVE DATE

This delegation is effective upon certification of the Department's Delegations 

Control Officer and supersedes EM/EMH/392. 

 

 _______________/s______________ 

 Denise Carter

 

 

 

OGC Concurrence and Date: Michael Taylor, 11/18/2019 

Certified Date: 12/11/2019 

Departmental Delegations Control Officer: Jim Clemmens

Control Number: EK/EKH/210
#### STATE v. COOK

No. 475P97

Case below: 127 N.C.App. 395

Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 6 November 1997.