alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit (32)(b)**

 

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of The Empire District Electric Company(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2010 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),Gregory A. Knapp, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 
| **By**                                                       | /s/ Gregory A. Knapp |   |
|--------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------|--------|
| Name:  Gregory A. Knapp                                      |                 |
| Title:  Vice President - Finance and Chief Financial Officer |                 |

 

Date:       May 6, 2010

 

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 or otherdocument authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature thatappears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statementrequired by Section 906, has been provided to The Empire District ElectricCompany and will be retained by The Empire District Electric Company andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
**Exhibit
13**
  CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the Annual Report of Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. (the
"Company") on Form 20-F for the year ended January 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Form 20-F") I David
Wolfin, President (and acting Principal Executive and Financial Officer), of the
Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of our
knowledge and belief:
 
 (1)
    The
      Form 20-F fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78M or 78o(d)); and
 
 (2)
    The
      information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.
 
 
 
 Dated:
July 12 ,
2005      *_/s/
David Wolfin____________*
 David
Wolfin, President
 (Principal
      Executive and Financial Officer)
No. 770.

#### Carl H. Richardson, as Trustee, etc. *v.*Germania Bank of the City of New York.

March 22, *5831920.

*Mr. Carroll G. Walter*for petitioner.

*Mr. Bernard Hershkopf*for respondent.

Petition for a writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
ROBERT J. MARTINEAU, JR. 

COMMISSIONER 

October 23, 20 I 4 

STATE OF TENNESSEE 

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND CONSERVATION 

NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE 37243·0435 

Honorable Heather McTeer Toney 

United States Environmental Protection Agency 

Region IV 

Atlanta Federal Center 

6 I Forsyth Street, SW 

Atlanta, GA 30303-3 I 04 

Dear Administrator McTeer Toney, 

BILL HASLAM 

GOVERNOR 

This letter is in reply to EPA's letter to Tennessee Governor Bill Haslam of August I 9, 20 I 4. That letter 

outlined EPA's response to Tennessee's initial recommendations of attainment areas for the 20 I 2 PM25 

NAAQS, outlined in our letter of December 9, 20 I 3. 

After careful consideration of EPA's response, Tennessee rep! ies that Hami I ton, Marion and Sequatchie 

Counties in Tennessee should be designated as unclassifiable- attainment in that the most recent air 

monitoring data supports the designation recommendation. 

As for the remaining counties in Tennessee, we recommend that EPA exercise its deferral authority in 

making final designations as we should soon have a complete three year data set to support a final 

designation. 

Thank you for your favorable consideration of this recommendation. Technical questions should be 

addressed to our department's air pollution control director, Barry R. Stephens, P. E. at (615) 532-0525 or 

Ban-y.Stephens@tn.gov . 

Robert J. Martineau, Jr. 

Commissioner 

Copy to: 

Beverly Banister, EPA Region IV Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management Division Program Director 

Tennessee Air Pollution Control Board Members 

Tennessee Local Air Pollution Control Program Directors 

TDEC Division of Air Pollution Control
### §51a–1. Contracts with cooperatives furnishing classers; amount and type of payment

On and after July 5, 1952, the Secretary may contract with cooperatives furnishing classers and other facilities for classing cotton and may pay for such services an amount, some part of which may be in kind, not in excess of the value of the samples.

(July 5, 1952, ch. 574, title I, §101, 66 Stat. 349.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Department of Agriculture Appropriation Act, 1953, and not as part of the United States Cotton Standards Act which comprises this chapter.
#### Alathea Moon, Respondent, v. Ramon E. Moon, Appellant.

Order entered on September 29, 1960, granting plaintiff wife’s motion for temporary alimony and counsel fees in an action for annulment unanimously reversed, on the law, on the facts, and in the exercise of discretion, and the motion denied, with $20 costs and disbursements of the appeal to abide the event. On the present record there is an insufficient showing of probability of success on the cause of action seeking an annulment. Moreover, plaintiff wife has sufficient means and income of her own and she has not shown a substantial change in her circumstances as a result of the marriage to her financial detriment. In view of these facts plaintiff wife has not shown the necessity for either temporary alimony or counsel fees. Motion for a stay dismissed, having become academic by virtue of the decision of this court decided herein. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Stevens, Eager and Noonan, JJ.
No. 669.

#### Gulf & Ship Island Railroad Company et al. *v.*Carl Boone et al., etc.

Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Mississippi.

Motion to dismiss or affirm submitted March 1, 1920.

Decided March 8, 1920.

*Mr. T. J. Wills*and *Mr. B. E. Eaton*for plaintiffs in error.

*Mr. George Anderson*for defendants in erfor.

*Per Curiam.*

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of *McCorquodale*v. *Texas,*211 U. S. 432; *Consolidated Turnpike Co.*v. *Norfolk, etc., Ry. Co.,*228 U. S. 326, 334; *St. Louis & San Francisco R. R. Co.*v. *Shepherd,*240 U. S. 240, 241; *Bilby*v. *Stewart,*246 U. S. 255, 257.
Editorial Note on Part 842
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 842 appear at 81 FR 83688, Nov. 22, 2016.

§ 842.12 Claims not payable. Claims that are not payable are: ( a ) Claims resulting from simple negligence.
( b ) Claims for personal injury or death.
( c ) Claims resulting from acts or omissions of Air Force military personnel while acting within the scope of their duty.
( d ) Claims of subrogees.
( e ) Claims arising from private indebtedness.
( f ) Claims for reimbursement for bad checks.
( g ) Claims involving wrongful taking stemming from larceny, forgery or deceit, which are not accompanied by riotous or violent action.
( h ) Claims against Air National Guard members unless they are performing duty under Title 10 U.S.C.
( i ) Claims for indirect, consequential or remote damages.
[55 FR 2809, Jan. 29, 1990. Redesignated and amended at 81 FR 83688, Nov. 22, 2016]
#### In the Matter of the Accounting of John W. Evans, as Committee of the Person and Property of Earl F. Evans, an Incompetent Person, Now Deceased, Appellant. Grace A. Pokrandt et al., as Administrators of the Estate of Earl F. Evans, Deceased, Respondents.

— -Judgment unanimously modified in accordance with the memorandum and as modified affirmed, with a single bill of costs to be divided equally between the parties filing briefs and their respective disbursements to be paid out of the estate. Memorandum: In our opinion a proper allowance to the committee for services as committee of the person and property is the sum of $2,000 and the allowance made by Special Term should be reduced to that amount. We are of the further opinion that the allowances made to the attorneys were excessive and such allowances are reduced to the sum of $1,750 to Milton S. Weisberg and Robert W. Marshlow for their services for the committee and the sum of $1,000 to William J. Ostrowski for services to the objectors. (Cross appeals from judgment of Erie Supreme Court judicially settling- the accounts of the committee.) Present — -Bastow, J. P., Goldman, Halpern, MeClusky and Henry, JJ.
#### Jerseyville Motor Company, appellant, v. Jerseyville Nursery, appellee.

Gen. No. 7,815.

Assumpsit to recover value of motor truck. Judgment for defendant. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Jersey county; -the Hon. E. S. Smith, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1924.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed March 6, 1925.

Hamilton & Cross, for appellant.

Chapman & Du Hadway, for appellee.

Mr. Presiding Justice Shurtleff

delivered the opinion of the court.
### §969. Revalidation

The Secretary, acting through the Commissioner, shall develop and implement—

(1) a revalidation process for Tier 2 and Tier 3 participants;

(2) a framework based upon objective criteria for identifying participants for periodic revalidation not less frequently than once during each 4-year period following the initial validation; and

(3) an annual plan for revalidation that includes—

(A) performance measures;

(B) an assessment of the personnel needed to perform the revalidations; and

(C) the number of participants that will be revalidated during the following year.

(Pub. L. 109–347, title II, §219, Oct. 13, 2006, 120 Stat. 1913.)
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 616 

To amend section 721 of the Defense Production Act of 1950 to include 

the Secretary of Agriculture and the Secretary of Health and Human 

Services as members of the Committee on Foreign Investment in the 

United States and to require the Committee to consider the security 

of the food and agriculture systems of the United States as a factor 

to be considered when determining to take action with respect to foreign 

investment, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 14, 2017 

Mr. GRASSLEY (for himself, Ms. STABENOW, and Mrs. ERNST) introduced the 

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 

Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend section 721 of the Defense Production Act of 

1950 to include the Secretary of Agriculture and the 

Secretary of Health and Human Services as members 

of the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United 

States and to require the Committee to consider the 

security of the food and agriculture systems of the 

United States as a factor to be considered when determining to take action with respect to foreign investment, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 616 IS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Food Security is Na3 tional Security Act of 2017’’. 

4 SEC. 2. CONSIDERATION OF FOOD INSECURITY IN DETER5 MINATIONS OF THE COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN 

6 INVESTMENT IN THE UNITED STATES. 

7 Section 721(f) of the Defense Production Act of 1950 

8 (50 U.S.C. 4565(f)) is amended— 

9 (1) in paragraph (10), by striking ‘‘; and’’ and 

10 inserting a semicolon; 

11 (2) by redesignating paragraph (11) as para12 graph (12); and 

13 (3) by inserting after paragraph (10) the fol14 lowing: 

15 ‘‘(11) the potential effects of the proposed or 

16 pending transaction on the security of the food and 

17 agriculture systems of the United States, including 

18 any effects on the availability of, access to, or safety 

19 and quality of food; and’’. 

20 SEC. 3. INCLUSION OF SECRETARIES OF AGRICULTURE 

21 AND HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES ON THE 

22 COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN INVESTMENT IN 

23 THE UNITED STATES. 

24 Section 721(k)(2) of the Defense Production Act of 

25 1950 (50 U.S.C. 4565(k)(2)) is amended— 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 616 IS

1 (1) by redesignating subparagraphs (H), (I), 

2 and (J) as subparagraphs (J), (K), and (L), respec3 tively; and 

4 (2) by inserting after subparagraph (G) the fol5 lowing: 

6 ‘‘(H) The Secretary of Agriculture. 

7 ‘‘(I) The Secretary of Health and Human 

8 Services.’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
§ 757.17 Statute of limitations. ( a ) *Federal.* Claims asserted under the MCRA or against an automobile liability insurer through 10 U.S.C. 1095 are founded in tort and must be brought within 3 years after the action “first accrues” (28 U.S.C. 2415b). Normally, a medical care claim “first accrues” on the initial date of treatment.
( b ) *Claims asserted under 10 U.S.C. 1095 .* Although legal arguments can be made that claims asserted under 10 U.S.C. 1095 against a no-fault or personal injury protection insurer are founded in contract and can be brought within 6 years (28 U.S.C. 2415a), all claims should be asserted within 3 years of the date when the claim accrued. However, some states require notice of such claims to be filed within a shorter period of time.
[72 FR 53429, Sept. 19, 2007]
Editorial Note on Part 842
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 842 appear at 81 FR 83688, Nov. 22, 2016.

§ 842.73 Definitions. ( a ) *Admiralty contracts.* A contract covering maritime services or a maritime transaction such as vessel procurement and space for commercial ocean transportation of DOD cargo, mail, and personnel is an admiralty contract.
( b ) *General average.* General average is the admiralty rule that when someone's property is thrown overbaord to save a ship, the ship owner and all owners of the cargo must share the loss.
( c ) *Maritime torts.* A maritime tort is one committed in navigable waters or on land or in the air where a substantial element of the damage, personal injury, or death occurred in navigable waters. The activity causing the tortious act must bear some significant relationship to traditional maritime activity.
( d ) *Vessel.* Every description of watercraft used or usable as a means of transportation on water is a vessel. (1 U.S.C. 3)
[55 FR 2809, Jan. 29, 1990. Redesignated at 81 FR 83695, Nov. 22, 2016]
Exhibit 31.2


I, Harve Cathey, certify that:

1.I  have  reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of  Ennis,
  Inc.;

2.Based  on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not  contain
  any  untrue  statement of a material fact or omit  to  state  a
  material  fact necessary to make the statements made, in  light
  of  the  circumstances under which such statements  were  made,
  not  misleading  with  respect to the period  covered  by  this
  quarterly report;

3.Based  on  my  knowledge, the financial statements,  and  other
  financial  information  included  in  this  quarterly   report,
  fairly   present  in  all  material  respects   the   financial
  condition,  results  of  operations  and  cash  flows  of   the
  registrant  as  of,  and  for, the periods  presented  in  this
  quarterly report;

4.The   registrant's  other  certifying  officers   and   I   are
  responsible   for   establishing  and  maintaining   disclosure
  controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules  13a-
  15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

     a)    Designed  such disclosure controls and  procedures  to
     ensure that material information relating to the registrant,
     including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
     by  others  within those entities, particularly  during  the
     period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

     b)     Evaluated   the  effectiveness  of  the  registrant's
     disclosure  controls and procedures and  presented  in  this
     report  our  conclusions  about  the  effectiveness  of  the
     disclosure  controls and procedures, as of the  end  of  the
     period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     c)   Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's
     internal  control  over  financial reporting  that  occurred
     during  the  registrant's most recent  fiscal  quarter  (the
     registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of the annual
     report)  that  has  materially affected,  or  is  reasonably
     likely  to  materially  affect,  the  registrant's  internal
     control over financial reporting; and

5.The   registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and   I   have
  disclosed,  based  on  our  most  recent  evaluation,  to   the
  registrant's  auditors and the audit committee of  registrant's
  board  of  directors  (or  persons  performing  the  equivalent
  function):

     a)   All significant deficiencies in the design or operation
     of  internal  controls  over which  financial  reporting  is
     reasonably  likely  to  adversely  affect  the  registrant's
     ability  to record, process, summarize and report  financial
     data; and

     b)    Any  fraud,  whether  or not material,  that  involves
     management or other employees who have a significant role in
     the registrant's internal controls.



/s/ Harve Cathey

Harve Cathey
Chief Financial Officer
June 15, 2005
No. 722.

#### Alfred R. Swann *v.*W. W. Austell, Executor, etc., et al.

March 8, 1920.

*Mr. Daniel W. Rountree*and *Mr. Clifford L. Anderson*for petitioner.

*Mr. Jack J. Spalding*and *Mr. Charles T. Hopkins*for respondents.

Petition for a writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
### §4603. Honey research, promotion, and consumer information order

To effectuate the declared policy of this chapter, the Secretary shall, subject to the provisions of this chapter, issue and, from time to time, amend orders and regulations applicable to persons engaged in the production, sale, or handling of honey and honey products in the United States and the importation of honey and honey products into the United States.

(Pub. L. 98–590, §4, Oct. 30, 1984, 98 Stat. 3116; Pub. L. 105–185, title VI, §605(c), June 23, 1998, 112 Stat. 589.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1998—Pub. L. 105–185 inserted "and regulations" after "orders".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Conforming Amendment to Order

Pub. L. 101–624, title XIX, §1987, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 3908, provided that: "Notwithstanding any provision of the Honey Research, Promotion, and Consumer Information Act (7 U.S.C. 4601 et seq.), the Secretary of Agriculture, after notice and opportunity for public comment, shall issue an amendment to the order in effect under such Act on the date of the enactment of this Act [Nov. 28, 1990] to conform such order to the amendments made by this subtitle [subtitle F (§§1981–1989) of title XIX of Pub. L. 101–624, enacting section 4610a of this title and amending sections 1787, 4602, 4606, 4608, and 4612 of this title], which shall become effective on the date of the publication of such amendment to the order in the Federal Register without a referendum thereon (except for the referendum specifically provided for under section 1985 [amending section 4612 of this title]). The Secretary shall issue such amendment to the order in final form not later than 150 days after the date of the enactment of this Act."
#### § 21.565 Must DoD Components' electronic systems accept Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) numbers?

The DoD Components must comply with paragraph 5.e of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) policy directive entitled, “Requirement for a DUNS number in Applications for Federal Grants and Cooperative Agreements.”[2] Paragraph 5.e requires electronic systems that handle information about grants and cooperative agreements (which, for the DoD, include Technology Investment Agreements) to accept DUNS numbers. Each DoD Component that awards or administers grants or cooperative agreements must ensure that DUNS numbers are accepted by each such system for which the DoD Component controls the system specifications. If the specifications of such a system are subject to another organization's control and the system can not accept DUNS numbers, the DoD Component must alert that organization to the OMB policy directive's requirement for use of DUNS numbers with a copy to: Director for Basic Research, OASD(R&E), 3040 Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-3040.

[72 FR 34986, June 26, 2007, as amended at 85 FR 51241, Aug. 19, 2020]

###### Footnotes -
  21.565

[2] This OMB policy directive is available at the Internet site *http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/grants/grants_docs.html.*
FC DFGD & FFBudgetary Cost Estimate Breakdown (Class 4)WBS DescriptionNIDDFGDNIDFFNIDBy‐ProductHandlingACIBOPContingency&AllocationsTotal010 ExistingConditions1,259,054$1,259,054$110 SiteDevelopment19,026,474$19,026,474$140 RailImprovements 3,141,629$3,141,629$202 DFGDProcessIslandBuilding 10,684,509$10,684,509$204 LimeBuilding 2,833,885$2,833,885$215 ByproductExhausterBuilding 2,815,453$2,815,453$221 AirCompressorBuilding1,769,522$1,769,522$254 DFGDSwitchgear&Control(PDC)Building1,830,589$1,830,589$261 CEMSBuilding473,195$473,195$271 ACIEnclosure116,888$116,888$292 Warehouse3,963,889$3,963,889$315 BoilerModifications985,989$985,989$415 IDFan 8,411,734$8,411,734$416 FlueGasDuct 34,354,957$34,354,957$420 CEMS2,915,447$2,915,447$451 DFGDReagent(Lime)Receiving1,772,074$1,772,074$452 DFGDReagent(Lime)StorageandTransfer10,586,053$10,586,053$453 DFGDLimeFeedSystem 3,298,517$3,298,517$455 DFGDAbsorberSystem(JDuct) 26,102,350$26,102,350$456 FabricFilter60,615,891$60,615,891$444 ACIFeed&Injection8,753,372$8,753,372$484 FlyAshSystem2,397,861$2,397,861$492 ByproductHandlingSystem 13,487,405$13,487,405$494 ByproductSiloHandlingw/Enclosure 9,168,057$9,168,057$605 CommonUtilityRacks2,967,455$2,967,455$612 PlantAir1,089,727$1,089,727$614 InstrumentAir3,457,773$3,457,773$624 ServiceWater2,755,482$2,755,482$626 PotableWater566,156$566,156$632 ProcessWaterDrain1,490,651$1,490,651$634 StormSewer1,443,286$1,443,286$636 SanitarySewer368,014$368,014$692 FireWater94,624$94,624$720 HighVoltageElectric(15kV‐161kV) 4,868,744$4,868,744$770 DFGD‐NIDControls 6,704,531$6,704,531$730 MediumVoltageElectric(1000V‐15kV) 1,626,480$2,629,689$677,001$258,466$1,041,106$6,232,742$740 LowVoltage 2,927,363$4,732,955$1,218,476$465,192$1,873,799$11,217,784$760 DCandUPSSystems 352,353$569,684$146,662$55,993$225,541$1,350,233$770 ControlsModernization 933,409$1,509,134$388,519$148,329$597,473$3,576,864$780 PlantSecurity&Communications56,116$90,729$23,358$8,918$35,920$215,040$860 ConstructionIndirects 1,719,493$2,780,074$715,716$273,247$1,100,644$6,589,175$901 OutsideProfessionalServices2,072,972$3,351,577$862,847$329,419$1,326,905$7,943,720$912 ConceptualEngineering697,159$1,127,166$290,183$110,787$446,250$2,671,546$913 DetailedDesignEngineering 3,588,163$5,801,335$1,493,525$570,200$2,296,776$13,750,000$920 ProjectManagement&Controls2,847,044$4,603,096$1,185,045$452,428$1,822,388$10,910,000$970 AEPServices 9,423,658$15,236,154$3,922,473$1,497,528$6,032,066$36,111,879$980 Contingency32,606,902$32,606,902$93,198,347$150,682,917$38,792,582$14,810,289$59,656,085$32,606,902$389,747,122$‐$Allocations26,866,602$26,866,602$AFUDC28,646,279$28,646,279$93,198,347$150,682,917$38,792,582$14,810,289$59,656,085$88,119,783$445,260,003$PreparedbyJosephZupsic11/21/2012Page1