alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §3319b. Joint requests for proposals

#### (a) In general

In carrying out any competitive agricultural research, education, or extension grant program authorized under this or any other Act, the Secretary may cooperate with 1 or more other Federal agencies (including the National Science Foundation) in issuing joint requests for proposals, awarding grants, and administering grants, for similar or related research, education, or extension projects or activities.

#### (b) Administration

#### (1) Secretary

The Secretary may delegate authority to issue requests for proposals, make grant awards, or administer grants, in whole or in part, to a cooperating Federal agency.

#### (2) Cooperating Federal agency

The cooperating Federal agency may delegate to the Secretary authority to issue requests for proposals, make grant awards, or administer grants, in whole or in part.

#### (c) Regulations

The Secretary and a cooperating Federal agency may agree to make applicable to recipients of grants—

(1) the post-award grant administration regulations applicable to recipients of grants from the Secretary; or

(2) the post-award grant administration regulations applicable to recipients of grants from the cooperating Federal agency.

#### (d) Joint peer review panels

Subject to section 3129a of this title, the Secretary and a cooperating Federal agency may establish joint peer review panels for the purpose of evaluating grant proposals.

(Pub. L. 95–113, title XIV, §1473B, as added Pub. L. 107–171, title VII, §7403(b), May 13, 2002, 116 Stat. 456.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 3319b, Pub. L. 95–113, title XIV, §1473B, as added Pub. L. 99–198, title XIV, §1427, Dec. 23, 1985, 99 Stat. 1553, provided for technology development for small- and medium-sized farming operations, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 101–624, title XVI, §1601(f)(1)(E), Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 3704.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Purposes

Pub. L. 107–171, title VII, §7403(a), May 13, 2002, 116 Stat. 456, provided that:

"The purposes of this section [enacting this section] are—

"(1) to reduce the duplication of administrative functions relating to grant awards and administration among Federal agencies conducting similar types of research, education, and extension programs;

"(2) to maximize the use of peer review resources in research, education, and extension programs; and

"(3) to reduce the burden on potential recipients that may offer similar proposals to receive competitive grants under different Federal programs in overlapping subject areas."

#### Definitions

Pub. L. 107–171, title VII, §7401, May 13, 2002, 116 Stat. 455, provided that: "In this subtitle [subtitle D (§7401–7412) of title VII of Pub. L. 107–171, enacting this section and sections [former] 3310a, [former] 3319f, 5925c, 5925d, and 7630 of this title and provisions set out as notes under this section and sections 3101, [former] 3319f, [former] 5925a, and 5925b of this title]:

"(1) Department.—The term 'Department' means the Department of Agriculture.

"(2) Secretary.—The term 'Secretary' means the Secretary of Agriculture."
# ACC CPI Safety & Health Tra ining Through April 12, 2011
**Job Description**  

## Fully **Complete In**  **Pr ogr** **ess To**  **tal**

**YTD March**  **YTD April**  **YTD March**  **YTD April**  **YTD April**  Applicator 179 258 107 136 394 Helper 30 43 12 22 65 Other 325 430 177 239 669 Supervisor 173 240 151 185 425 To tal 707 971 447 447 1553



## Te **st Scor** **es 90**  **- 100%**  **70 -**  **89% <70%**  Pe rcent achieving test scores 91.3% 7.0% 1.6%
# Materials Not Included in **Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket**

Docket Number: FAA- 2011 - 1090 Directorate Identifier: 2011NM138AD

84 - 52 -69, RB --- 5/9/11 84 - 52 -69, RA --- 4/26/11 84 - 52 -69 --- 1/28/11

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket 

### MA **Y BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate Rules Docket 1601 Lind Ave. SW., Renton, WA 98057 425.227.1221 **DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Form Date: 03/05/2008
MEMORANDUM

TO: Addressees

 

FROM: The Secretary

SUBJECT: Delegation of Authority

I. DELEGATION

Under the authority vested in me by section 412 of the Department of Education 

Organization Act, 20 U.S.C. §3472, I hereby delegated to you, and to anyone 

serving for you in an acting capacity, for your respective Principal Office, the 

authority under 5 U.S.C. Section 3595(b)(3)(B), to file written objections to the 

Office of Personnel Management, when appropriate, based on your determination 

that the career Senior Executive Service employees referred failed to meet the 

technical qualifications for applicable position vacancies.

Unless otherwise noted in future delegations of authority, legislative amendments to 

the authorities delegated herein are included in the scope of this delegation.

II. RESERVATIONS

None.

III. REDELEGATION

This authority may not be redelegated.

IV. CERTIFICATION AND EFFECTIVE DATE

This delegation is effective upon certification by the Department’s Principal 

Delegations Control Officer and supersedes all previous delegation of this authority.

___________(Signed)___________ 

Richard W. Riley

OGC Clearance and Date: /s/ R. Wexler, 7/12/96

Certification Date: 7/31/96

Certified by Departmental Delegations Control Officer: /s/ Naty Beetle 

 

Control Number: EA/EJ/28
#### (A) John E. Collins v. Carver Federal Savings & Loan Association. (B) In the Matter of Charles N. Taintor, Deceased. (C) Mideast Securities Corp. v. RKO General, Inc. (D) In the Matter of Henri Freudmann, Deceased. (E) In the Matter of Noxon Operating Corporation v. Robert E. Herman, as State Rent Administrator. (F) In the Matter of City Title Insurance Company, v. Superintendent of Insurance of the State of New York.

Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, Valente and McNally, JJ. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Valente, Stevens and Steuer, JJ. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, McNally and Eager, JJ. Concur — Valente, J. P., McNally, Stevens, Steuer and Bastow, JJ. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, McNally and Eager, JJ. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Valente, Stevens and Steuer, JJ.—• [In each action] Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied, with $10 costs.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7371

MELVIN ARNOLD PROPPS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

THE WEST VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS;

WILLIAM C. DUNCIL, Deputy Commissioner; GEORGE

TRENT, Warden, Mount Olive Correctional Center; HAINES, Warden, Huttonsville Correctional

Center; KEITH WEESE, Acting Warden, Huttonsville Correctional Center; WILLIAM DAVIS,

Commissioner,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern

District of West Virginia, at Elkins. Robert Earl Maxwell, Senior

District Judge. (CA-98-48-2)

Submitted: November 5, 1998 Decided: November 23, 1998

Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Melvin Arnold Propps, Appellant Pro Se. Leslie K. Kiser, WEST VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Charleston, West Virginia, for

Appellees.
2

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Melvin Arnold Propps appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1998) complaint.

Propps alleged that he was denied visitation with his wife; he

sought injunctive relief and monetary damages. We have reviewed the

record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially on the reasoning of the

district court. Propps v. West Virginia Dep’t of Corrections, No.

CA-98-48-2 (N.D.W. Va. Sept. 1, 1998). We find Propps’ claim for

money damages to be without merit because there is no constitutional right to visitation. See Kentucky Dep’t of Corrections v. Thompson, 490 U.S. 454, 460-61 (1989). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
### §1100. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act Aug. 8, 1947, ch. 519, §1, 61 Stat. 922, provided that this chapter may be cited as the Sugar Act of 1948, and expired on Dec. 31, 1974.

A prior section, act Sept. 1, 1937, ch. 898, §1, 50 Stat. 903, provided that this chapter may be cited as the Sugar Act of 1937, and expired on Dec. 31, 1947.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Termination Date

Section 412, formerly §411, of act Aug. 8, 1947, ch. 519, 61 Stat. 933, as amended by act Sept. 1, 1951, ch. 379, §5, 65 Stat. 320; renumbered §412 and amended by act May 29, 1956, ch. 342, §§17, 18, 70 Stat. 221; July 6, 1960, Pub. L. 86–592, §1, 74 Stat. 330; Mar. 31, 1961, Pub. L. 87–15, §1, 75 Stat. 40; July 13, 1962, Pub. L. 87–535, §16, 76 Stat. 166; Nov. 8, 1965, Pub. L. 89–331, §12(5), 79 Stat. 1280; Oct. 14, 1971, Pub. L. 92–138, §18(a), 85 Stat. 390; Oct. 22, 1986, Pub. L. 99–514, §2, 100 Stat. 2095, provided that: "The powers vested in the Secretary under this Act [this chapter] shall terminate on December 31, 1974, or on March 31 of the year of termination of the tax imposed by section 4501(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 [formerly IRC 1954] [section 4501(a) of Title 26] whichever is the earlier date, except that the Secretary shall have power to make payments under title III [subchapter III of this chapter]—

"(1) under programs applicable to the crop year 1974 and previous crop years, if the powers vested in the Secretary otherwise terminate on December 31, 1974, or

"(2) under programs applicable to the crop years preceding the calendar year in which the tax imposed under section 4501(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 [formerly I.R.C. 1954] terminates, if the powers vested in the Secretary otherwise terminate before December 31, 1974."
§ 202.9 Conducting RAB meetings. ( a ) *Public participation.* RAB meetings shall be open to the public. ( 1 ) The installation co-chair shall prepare and publish a timely public notice in a local newspaper of general circulation announcing each RAB meeting. If applicable, it is recommended that the meeting also be announced on the installation's Web site.
( 2 ) Each RAB meeting shall be held at a reasonable time and in a manner or place reasonably accessible to and usable by all participants, including persons with disabilities.
( 3 ) Presentation materials and readable maps should be provided to all meeting participants as appropriate.
( 4 ) Interested persons shall be permitted to attend, appear before, or file statements with any RAB, subject to such reasonable rules or regulations as may be prescribed. Open solicitation of public comments shall be permitted and members of the public will have a designated time on the agenda to speak to the RAB committee as a whole.
( b ) *Nature of discussions.* The installation shall give careful consideration to all comments provided by individual RAB members. Group consensus is not a prerequisite for RAB input. Each member of the RAB may provide advice as an individual; however, when a RAB decides to vote or poll for consensus, only community members should participate.
( c ) *Meeting minutes.* The installation co-chair, in coordination with the community co-chair, shall prepare the minutes of each RAB meeting. ( 1 ) The RAB meeting minutes shall contain a record of the persons present; a complete and accurate description of matters discussed and comments received; and copies of all reports received, issued, or approved by the RAB. The accuracy of all minutes shall be certified by the RAB co-chairs. RAB minutes should be kept in the information repository; however, if the RAB minutes reflect decision-making, copies should also be documented in the Administrative Record.
( 2 ) The records, reports, minutes, appendixes, working papers, drafts, studies, agenda, or other documents that were made available to or prepared for or by each RAB shall be available for public inspection and copying at a publicly accessible location, such as the information repositories established under the installation's Community Relations Plan, a public library, or in the offices of the installation to which the RAB reports, until the RAB ceases to exist.
[71 FR 27617, May 12, 2006; 71 FR 30719, May 30, 2006]
§ 99.5 Eligibility for indemnification. As provided for under 5 U.S.C. 9101(b)(3), a State or locality may request an indemnification agreement. ( a ) To be eligible for an indemnification agreement a State or locality must have had a law in effect on December 4, 1985 that prohibited or had the effect of prohibiting the disclosure of criminal history record information to the DoD, OPM, or CIA.
( b ) A State or locality is also eligible for an indemnification agreement if it meets the conditions of paragraph (a) of this section, but nevertheless provided criminal history record information to the DoD, OPM, or CIA on or before December 4, 1985.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>       5
<MULTIPLIER>    1,000

<S>                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                           SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                 3,789
<SECURITIES>                           15,175
<RECEIVABLES>                          66,267
<ALLOWANCES>                           0
<INVENTORY>                            24,213
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                       121,162
<PP&E>                                 99,476
<DEPRECIATION>                         (40,840)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         215,597
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                  65,281
<BONDS>                                25,756
<COMMON>                               15,007
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                  0
<PREFERRED>                            50
<OTHER-SE>                             47,118
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           215,597
<SALES>                                145,574
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                       145,574
<CGS>                                  110,291
<TOTAL-COSTS>                          142,672
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                     3,167
<INCOME-PRETAX>                        1,249
<INCOME-TAX>                           2,400
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                    (1,151)
<DISCONTINUED>                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                        0
<CHANGES>                              0
<NET-INCOME>                           (1,151)
<EPS-BASIC>                          (0.20)
<EPS-DILUTED>                          (0.20)

</TABLE>
§ 776.39 Evaluation for use by third persons. ( a ) A covered attorney may provide an evaluation of a matter affecting a client for the use of someone other than the client if: ( 1 ) The covered attorney reasonably believes that making the evaluation is compatible with other aspects of the covered attorney's relationship with the client; and
( 2 ) The client provides informed consent, confirmed in writing.
( b ) Except as disclosure is required in connection with a report of an evaluation, information relating to the evaluation is otherwise protected by § 776.25 of this part.
( c ) [Reserved]
### §6611. Findings and purposes

#### (a) Findings

The Congress finds that—

(1) the economic well-being of rural America is vital to our national growth and prosperity;

(2) the economic well-being of many rural communities depends upon the goods and services that are derived from National Forest System land;

(3) the economies of many of these communities suffer from a lack of industrial and business diversity;

(4) this lack of diversity is particularly serious in communities whose economies are predominantly dependent on timber and recreation resources and where management decisions made on National Forest System land by Federal and private organizations may disrupt the supply of those resources;

(5) the Forest Service has expertise and resources that could be directed to promote modernization and economic diversification of existing industries and services based on natural resources;

(6) the Forest Service has the technical expertise to provide leadership, in cooperation with other governmental agencies and the private sector, to assist rural communities dependent upon National Forest System land resources to upgrade existing industries and diversify by developing new economic activity in non-forest-related industries; and

(7) technical assistance, training, education, and other assistance provided by the Department of Agriculture can be targeted to provide immediate help to those rural communities in greatest need.

#### (b) Purposes

The purposes of this subchapter are—

(1) to provide assistance to rural communities that are located in or near National Forest System land and that are economically dependent upon natural resources or are likely to be economically disadvantaged by Federal or private sector land management practices;

(2) to aid in diversifying such communities' economic bases; and

(3) to improve the economic, social, and environmental well-being of rural America.

(Pub. L. 101–624, title XXIII, §2373, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 4046; Pub. L. 106–113, div. B, §1000(a)(3) [title III, §345(a)], Nov. 29, 1999, 113 Stat. 1535, 1501A–203.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1999—Subsec. (a)(2). Pub. L. 106–113, §1000(a)(3) [title III, §345(a)(1)(A)], substituted "National Forest System land;" for "national forests;".

Subsec. (a)(4). Pub. L. 106–113, §1000(a)(3) [title III, §345(a)(1)(B)], substituted "National Forest System land" for "the national forests".

Subsec. (a)(5). Pub. L. 106–113, §1000(a)(3) [title III, §345(a)(1)(C)], substituted "natural resources;" for "forest resources;".

Subsec. (a)(6). Pub. L. 106–113, §1000(a)(3) [title III, §345(a)(1)(D)], substituted "National Forest System land resources" for "national forest resources".

Subsec. (b)(1). Pub. L. 106–113, §1000(a)(3) [title III, §345(a)(2)], substituted "National Forest System land" for "national forests" and "natural resources" for "forest resources".
Judge Algenon L. Marbley, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Ohio, *

sitting by designation.

NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION

File Name: 08a0447n.06

Filed: July 30, 2008

No. 07-6146

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

TRACY MCDONALD,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

JOHN POTTER, Postmaster General,

Defendant-Appellee.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED

STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE

Before: COOK and GRIFFIN, Circuit Judges, and MARBLEY, District Judge.*

COOK, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff Tracy McDonald appeals the district court’s grant of

summary judgment for her employer, defendant John Potter, Postmaster General of the United States

Postal Service (the “Postal Service”) on her Rehabilitation Act claims. McDonald alleges that the

Postal Service failed to reasonably accommodate her two alleged disabilities: (1) migraines induced

by a sensitivity to fragrances (i.e. fragrances worn by her coworkers, cleaning chemicals); and (2)

a back condition. She further alleges that the Postal Service discriminated and retaliated against her

due to these disabilities. The Postal Service filed a motion for summary judgment, and the district
No. 07-6146

McDonald v. Potter

- 2 -

court granted the motion and dismissed with prejudice all of McDonald’s claims. Review of the

briefs and record counsels us to agree with the district court. Because a separate opinion would only

duplicate the district court’s thorough analysis, we AFFIRM the court’s judgment, adopting its

reasoning.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S 3RD QUARTER 10-Q 1997.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          15,190
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   40,295
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,064
<INVENTORY>                                     28,216
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                94,166
<PP&E>                                          28,737
<DEPRECIATION>                                  15,092
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 122,379
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           32,653
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           134
<OTHER-SE>                                      89,562
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   122,379
<SALES>                                         97,209
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               110,153
<CGS>                                           55,959
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   65,364
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                32,479
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 (240)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   6
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 12,981
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,492
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,489
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,489
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .68<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .65
<FN>
<F1> For Purposes of This Exhibit, Primary means Basic.
</FN>


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 608 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 608

   To nullify the effect of the March 6, 2017, Executive order that 
 temporarily restricts most nationals from six countries from entering 
                           the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 13, 2017

 Mrs. Feinstein (for herself, Mr. Schumer, Mr. Durbin, Ms. Klobuchar, 
 Ms. Cortez Masto, Mr. Booker, Mr. Leahy, Mrs. Shaheen, Mr. Coons, Mr. 
   Blumenthal, Ms. Hirono, Mr. Markey, Ms. Baldwin, Ms. Warren, Mr. 
Carper, Mr. Sanders, Mr. Bennet, Mrs. Murray, Mr. Udall, Mr. Kaine, Mr. 
   Franken, Mr. Schatz, Mr. Reed, Mrs. Gillibrand, Mr. Merkley, Ms. 
 Hassan, Mr. Murphy, Mr. Menendez, Mr. King, Mr. Wyden, Mr. Casey, Mr. 
  Heinrich, Mr. Cardin, Mr. Van Hollen, Ms. Duckworth, Mr. Brown, Ms. 
Stabenow, and Ms. Harris) introduced the following bill; which was read 
          twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To nullify the effect of the March 6, 2017, Executive order that 
 temporarily restricts most nationals from six countries from entering 
                           the United States.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RESCISSION.

    The provisions of Executive Order 13780 (82 Fed. Reg. 13209; March 
6, 2017), entitled ``Protecting the Nation From Foreign Terrorist Entry 
Into the United States'', are rescinded and shall not have any legal 
effect.
                                 <all>
```