alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
                              THIS   SCHEDULE    CONTAINS   SUMMARY    FINANCIAL
                              INFORMATION   EXTRACTED   FROM  THE   CONSOLIDATED
                              BALANCE  SHEET  AT  SEPTEMBER  30,  1996  AND  THE
                              RELATED  CONSOLIDATED  STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND OF
                              CASH FLOWS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,
                              1996  OF   THREE-FIVE   SYSTEMS,   INC.   AND  ITS
                              SUBSIDIARIES  AND IS  QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
                              REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 9-MOS  
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996  
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1996  
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1996  
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                          1  
<CASH>                                               9,878  
<SECURITIES>                                             0  
<RECEIVABLES>                                        4,686  
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0  
<INVENTORY>                                          6,215  
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    29,851  
<PP&E>                                              31,334  
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0  
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      61,522  
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                8,343  
<BONDS>                                                  0  
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0  
<PREFERRED>                                              0  
<COMMON>                                                78  
<OTHER-SE>                                               0  
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        61,522  
<SALES>                                             45,657  
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    45,657  
<CGS>                                               46,143  
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       53,293  
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       116  
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0  
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0  
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     (7,510) 
<INCOME-TAX>                                        (2,924) 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 (4,586) 
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0  
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0  
<CHANGES>                                                0  
<NET-INCOME>                                        (4,586) 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        (0.59) 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (0.59) 
                                               

</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein, Justices

Order 

February 24, 2015

150678-80(124)

SS as Next Friend of Minor LM, DS as Next,

Friend of Minor SD, MJ as Next Friend of 

Minor MS, DC as Next Friend of Minor LB,

TF as Next Friend of Minors DF, ID, and FC,

and LH as Next Friend of Minor CM,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

SC: 150678, 150679

v COA: 317071, 317072

Wayne CC: 12-009231-CZ

STATE OF MICHIGAN, STATE BOARD OF

EDUCATION, DEPARTMENT OF

EDUCATION, and STATE SUPERINTENDENT

OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION,

Defendants-Appellees,

and

HIGHLAND PARK SCHOOL DISTRICT,

HIGHLAND PARK SCHOOL DISTRICT

EMERGENCY MANAGER, HIGHLAND PARK

PUBLIC SCHOOL ACADEMY SYSTEM, and

LEONA GROUP, LLC,

Defendants.

________________________________________/

SS as Next Friend of Minor LM, DS as Next,

Friend of Minor SD, MJ as Next Friend of 

Minor MS, DC as Next Friend of Minor LB,

TF as Next Friend of Minors DF, ID, and FC,

and LH as Next Friend of Minor CM,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

SC: 150680

v COA: 317073

Wayne CC: 12-009231-CZ
2

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 February 24, 2015

STATE OF MICHIGAN, STATE BOARD OF

EDUCATION, DEPARTMENT OF

EDUCATION, STATE SUPERINTENDENT

OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION, HIGHLAND PARK

PUBLIC SCHOOL ACADEMY SYSTEM, and

LEONA GROUP, LLC,

Defendants,

and

HIGHLAND PARK SCHOOL DISTRICT and

HIGHLAND PARK SCHOOL DISTRICT

EMERGENCY MANAGER, 

Defendants-Appellees.

________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the Educators’ motion to participate as amicus 

curiae is GRANTED. The amicus brief submitted on February 13, 2015, in support of 

plaintiffs-appellants’ application for leave to appeal is accepted for filing.

Clerk
§ 935.13 Revocation or suspension of permits and registrations. ( a ) The Commander may revoke or suspend any island permit or registration for cause, with or without notice.
( b ) The holder of any revoked or suspended permit or registration may demand a personal hearing before the Commander within 30 days after the effective date of the revocation or suspension.
( c ) If a hearing is demanded, it shall be granted by the Commander within 30 days of the date of demand. The applicant may appear in person and present such documentary evidence as is pertinent. The Commander shall render a decision, in writing, setting forth his reasons, within 30 days thereafter.
( d ) If a hearing is not granted within 30 days, a written decision is not rendered within 30 days after a hearing, or the applicant desires to appeal a decision, he may, within 30 days after the latest of any of the foregoing dates appeal in writing to the General Counsel, whose decision shall be final.
#### § 2800.7 Designation of chairperson for Ad Hoc Committees.

The Counsel to the Vice President is designated as the responsible official to chair Ad Hoc Committees as necessary to act on all suggestions and complaints with respect to the administration of the information security program.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF POTOMAC ENERGY (BERMUDA) LTD. FOR
THE PERIOD APRIL 7 THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-07-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         102,782
<SECURITIES>                                    37,777
<RECEIVABLES>                                  150,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               290,559
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 312,902
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          121,701
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        47,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     144,201
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   312,902
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,443
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  697,242
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (695,799)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (695,799)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.19)
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Esterline Technologies Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 27, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-Q), I, Robert W. Cremin, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)    The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)    The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.





|                        |  |     |  |                                                
|----------------------- |  | --- |  | -----------------------------------------------
|Dated:  August 31, 2007 |  | By: |  | /s/ Robert W. Cremin                           
|                        |  |     |  | Robert W. Cremin                               
|                        |  |     |  | Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
#### 1216.603 Letter contracts.
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350)

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350),
the undersigned, Melissa Van Valkenburgh, Chief Financial Officer of ECC
International Corp., a Delaware corporation (the Company), does hereby
certify, to his knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2002 of
the Company (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| |  |                           
| |  | --------------------------
| |  | /s/Melissa Van Valkenburgh
| |  |                           
| |  |                           
| |  | Melissa Van Valkenburgh   
| |  | Chief Financial Officer   
| |  | February 14, 2003         

20
§ 2400.15 Classification guides. ( a ) OSTP shall issue and maintain classification guides to facilitate the proper and uniform derivative classification of information. These guides shall be used to direct derivative classification.
( b ) The classification guides shall be approved, in writing, by the Director or by officials having Top Secret original classification authority. Such approval constitutes an original classification decision.
( c ) Each classification guide shall specify the information subject to classification in sufficient detail to permit its ready and uniform identification and categorization and shall set forth the classification level and duration in each instance. Additionally, each classification guide shall prescribe declassification instructions for each element of information in terms of ( 1 ) a period of time,
( 2 ) the occurrence of an event, or
( 3 ) a notation that the information shall not be automatically declassified without the approval of OSTP.
( d ) The classification guides shall be kept current and shall be fully reviewed at least every two years. The Executive Director, OSTP shall maintain a list of all OSTP classification guides in current use.
( e ) The Executive Director, OSTP shall receive and maintain the record copy of all approved classification guides and changes thereto. He will assist the originator in determining the required distribution.
( f ) The Director may, for good cause, grant and revoke waivers of the requirement to prepare classification guides for specified classes of documents or information. The Director of the Information Security Oversight Office shall be notified of any waivers. The Director's decision to waive the requirement to issue classification guides for specific classes of documents or information will be based, at a minimum, on an evaluation of the following factors: ( 1 ) The ability to segregate and describe the elements of information;
( 2 ) The practicality of producing or disseminating the guide because of the nature of the information;
( 3 ) The anticipated usage of the guide as a basis for derivative classification; and
( 4 ) The availability of alternative sources for derivatively classifying the information in a uniform manner.
#### Nathaniel M. Gallin v. William F. Stafford, Jr.

Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted. Settle order. Concur — Botein, P. J., Rabin, Valente, McNally and Bergan, JJ.
**EXHIBIT 21**

 

ANDREW CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

List of Significant Subsidiaries

 

Significantsubsidiaries of the registrant, all of which are wholly owned are as follows:

 
| **Name of  Subsidiary**                     |   | **Jurisdiction of Incorporation** |
|---------------------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------|
| Andrew  AG                                  |   | Switzerland                       |
| Andrew  Canada Inc                          |   | Canada                            |
| Andrew  Corporation (Mexico), S.A. de C.V.  |   | Mexico                            |
| Andrew  GmbH                                |   | Germany                           |
| Andrew  do Brazil, Ltda.                    |   | Brazil                            |
| Andrew  Kommunikationssysteme AG            |   | Switzerland                       |
| Andrew  Limited                             |   | Scotland                          |
| Andrew  Satcom Africa (Pty.) Ltd.           |   | South  Africa                     |
| Andrew  S.A.R.L.                            |   | France                            |
| Andrew  Taiwan                              |   | Taiwan                            |
| Andrew  Telecommunications India Pvt. Ltd.  |   | India                             |
| Andrew  Telecommunications (China) Co. Ltd. |   | China                             |
| Andrew  Japan KK                            |   | Japan                             |
| Andrew  International Corporation           |   | State  of Illinois                |
| Andrew  Amplifiers Inc.                     |   | State  of Delaware                |
| Andrew  International Holding Corporation   |   | State  of Delaware                |
| Allen  Telecommunications LLC               |   | State  of Delaware                |
| ATI  International, Inc.                    |   | State  of Delaware                |
| Forem  Srl                                  |   | Italy                             |
| Forem  China (Shenzhen)                     |   | China                             |
| Mikom  GmbH                                 |   | Germany                           |
| Allen  Telecom Sweden, AB                   |   | Sweden                            |

 

1

----
MEMORANDUM

TO: Montserrat Garibay

FROM: The Secretary

SUBJECT: Delegation of Authority

I. DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY

By the authority vested in me by Section 412 of the Department of Education 

Organization Act, 20 U.S.C. § 3472, I hereby delegate to you the authority to perform the 

functions and duties vested by law and other delegations in the position of Assistant 

Deputy Secretary and Director of the Office of English Language Acquisition.

Unless otherwise noted in future delegations of authority, amendments to the authorities 

delegated herein are included in the scope of this delegation. 

II. RESERVATIONS

None. 

III. REDELEGATION 

This authority may not be redelegated. 

IV. CERTIFICATION AND EFFECTIVE DATE

This delegation is effective upon vacancy in the position of Assistant Deputy Secretary 

and Director of the Office of English Language Acquisition and certification by the 

Department’s Principal Delegations Control Officer. It remains in effect until an acting 

officer fills the position, or another individual is delegated the authority to perform the 

functions and duties of the position, whichever occurs first. 

I hereby ratify actions within the scope of this delegation taken by you prior to the date of 

certification. 

____________/s________________ 

 Miguel A. Cardona, Ed.D. 

OGC Clearance and Date: Michael Taylor

THE SECRETARY OF EDUCATION

WASHINGTON, DC 20202

www.ed.gov
Certified Date: 11/2/2022

Control Number: EA/ET/64

Delegation Control Office: Jim Clemmens
#### 1239.101 Policy.
### SUBCHAPTER X—FREEDOM TO E-FILE

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

This subchapter was enacted as part of the Freedom to E-File Act, and not as part of the Department of Agriculture Reorganization Act of 1994 which in part comprises this chapter.
|   | (i) | the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended June 27, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   | /s/ ILAN DASKAL |
|--------|--------|-----------------|

|   |   |  Ilan DaskalChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial andAccounting Officer) |
|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

_____________________

FORM 8-K ____________________
CURRENT REPORT

PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Date of report (Date of earliest event reported): March 9, 2007

MS Structured Asset Corp.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter)

 Delaware

001-16443, 333-64879

13-4026700
(State or Other Jurisdiction        of Incorporation) (Commission File        Numbers) (IRS Employer        Identification No.) 
 

1585 Broadway, Second Floor          New York, New York          Attention: Madhu Philips 

10036
                (Address of Principal Executive Offices)(Zip Code)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: 212-761-2520

Not Applicable
(Former Name or Former Address, if Changed Since Last Report)
 

 

Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions (see General Instruction A.2. below): 

 

o Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)

 

o Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)

 

o Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))

 

o Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c)) 

 

 

 

 

 

 

**Section 8**     **Other Events**

 

 

**Item 8.01**

**Other Events**

 

Structured Asset Trust Unit Repackagings (SATURNS), BellSouth Debenture Backed Series 2002-1 Trust (the “Trust”) (New York Stock Exchange Ticker Symbol “MJO”) has liquidated its assets and terminated.  Settlement of the securities held by the Trust occurred on March 9, 2007, and a liquidation distribution was made with respect to the Units of the Trust on March 9, 2007.  

 

In respect of the Class A Units, the amount of the distribution was $25.35 per Class A Unit, representing the full Unit Principal Balance of the Class A Units plus accrued interest in respect of the Class A Units through and excluding March 9, 2007.

 

In respect of the Class B Unit, the amount of the distribution was $44,809.96, representing the full Class B Present Value Amount as determined for value on March 9, 2007.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

**SIGNATURES**

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereto duly authorized.

 

Date: March 12, 2007

MS STRUCTURED ASSET CORP.

(Registrant)

By:      /s/ Madhu Philips             

Name:  Madhu Philips

Title:   Vice President
#### In the Matter of National Grange Mutual Insurance Company, Appellant, v Hing Wa Louie, Respondent, et al., Respondents.

[833 NYS2d 88]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Emily Jane Goodman, J.), entered March 14, 2006, which granted a temporary stay of arbitration pending a referee’s hearing and report on the insurance status of the alleged offending vehicle in the accident, and denied petitioner additional discovery, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The automobile driven by respondent, a Connecticut resident whose insurance policy was issued by petitioner in that state, was involved in an accident in the Bronx with an apparently uninsured vehicle registered to, owned and operated by a New Jersey resident. Since the accident occurred in New York State and petitioner does business here, respondent notified petitioner of his intention to pursue arbitration in connection with his uninsured motorist benefits *(see*Insurance Law § 5106 [b]). Petitioner thereupon commenced this proceeding to stay arbitration on the ground that respondent is not entitled to such arbitration under the relevant policy and Connecticut law.

Petitioner’s appeal from the temporary stay is based in part on the argument that Connecticut law governs Louie’s demand for arbitration. However, we have long held that where the obligation to arbitrate is not found in the policy but is instead imposed on that agreement by the New York State Insurance Law, it “is imposed not only upon New York policies but also upon policies written for nonresidents when their automobiles are operated in this State and the insurer is authorized to transact business here” *(Ohio Cas. Group v Avellini,*54 AD2d 632 [1976], *affd on our mem*43 NY2d 701 [1977]). To the extent the Second Department has more recently held otherwise *(Matter of State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v Torcivia,*277 AD2d 321 [2000]), we decline to follow that ruling.

The court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying the request for disclosure in aid of arbitration (CPLR *2943102 [c]), in view of petitioner’s failure to set forth the kind of information it expected to find through that discovery. Concur— Tom, J.P., Marlow, Nardelli, Gonzalez and Kavanagh, JJ.