alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ 96-20077 Summary Calender

___________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JESSE GALLEGO, Defendant-Appellant,

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

No. 96-20153 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus HERNANDO CHAVERRA, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. CR-H-95-87-11
- - - - - - - - - - November 21, 1996 Before GARWOOD, JOLLY, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges: PER CURIAM: *96-20077 -2-

47.5.4. Hernando Chaverra appeals his conviction for conspiracy to possess cocaine with the intent to distribute. As his sole issue on appeal, Chaverra challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support his conviction. Having reviewed the record and the briefs of the parties, we hold that the evidence was sufficient for a reasonable jury to find Chaverra guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. See United States v. Crain , 33 F.3d 480, 487-88 (5th Cir. 1994), cert. denied , 115 S. Ct. 1142 (1995). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Chaverra’s appeal, No. 96-20153, be SEVERED from that of his codefendant, Jesse Gallego, No. 96- 20077. AFFIRMED; APPEALS SEVERED.
### Triassic-Jurassic stratigraphy of the Culpeper and Barboursville basins, Virginia and Maryland

By: K. Y. LeeA. J. Froelich

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp1472

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

The presence of Late Triassic and Early Jurassic spores and pollen throughout an exposed stratigraphic section has enabled the systematic palynofloral zonation of the entire Culpeper Group, supported in places by characteristic fish zones. Strata of the Culpeper Group range in age from the Late Triassic to the Early Jurassic. The distribution of strata in the Culpeper Group is explained by accumulation of clastic sediments in a closed basin flanked by fault-block mountains that were episodically uplifted and eroded. Deposition within the basin was controlled by subsidence accompanying extensional tectonics during a dominantly semiarid climate punctuated by periods of abundant precipitation. During the late stages of Jurassic deposition of the Culpeper Group, tholeiitic diabase stocks, sills, and dikes (about 195 Ma) extensively intruded the sedimentary rocks and basalt flows and thermally metamorphosed them. The strata in the Culpeper and Barboursville basins were regionally tilted to the west, particularly along the western border faults, which produced steep dips, drag folds, gravity slumping, and slippage along bedding planes; broad, gently southwest plunging folds, and en echelon and strike-slip faults along the western basin margin; and folds and transverse faults within the basins. -from Authors

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
##### 



ENNIS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10Q
FOR THE PERIOD ENDED AUGUST 31, 2007
 EXHIBIT 32.2
 SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
  (1)
    
    The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended
August 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the
Report.
 /s/ Richard L. Travis, Jr.Richard L. Travis, Jr.Chief Financial Officer
Date: September 28, 2007 The foregoing Certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350; it is not
being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date
hereof, regardless of any general incorporation languages in such filing.
Appeal No. 76-447.

#### Antonio J. Souza, Jr. *et al. v.*Lera L. O’Hara.

Anthony DelGuidice Esq., attorney for defendant,

*Aram K. Berberian,*for plaintiffs.

*Anthony S. Del Guidice,*for defendant.

The plaintiffs’ motion to sustain their appeal for failure of the defendant to file a brief is denied.
§ 86.4 Policy. It is DoD policy that: ( a ) Individuals who have regular contact with children under 18 years of age in DoD-sanctioned child care services programs will undergo a criminal history background check in order to protect the health, safety and well-being of children in such programs.
( b ) All individuals who have regular contact with children under 18 years of age in DoD-sanctioned child care services programs and who also have a current or prior DoD affiliation must also undergo an IRC.
( c ) DoD Component heads are delegated the authority to make suitability determinations and take subsequent actions in cases involving applicants and appointees to covered positions as defined by 5 CFR 731.101, subject to the conditions in 5 CFR 731.103. This authority may be further delegated to authorized management officials, in writing, in accordance with volume 731 of DoD Instruction 1400.25. ( 1 ) The DoD Consolidated Adjudications Facility is responsible for making favorable suitability determinations for civilian personnel in accordance with Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Civilian Personnel and Policy Memorandum, “Responsibilities Under the Department of Defense Suitability and Fitness Adjudications for Civilians Employees Programs,” August 26, 2013.
( 2 ) Military members are not subject to suitability adjudication under Volume 731 of DoD Instruction 1400.25, “DoD Civilian Personnel Management System” (available at *http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/corres/pdf/140025v731.pdf*). Military members are subject to the background check requirements of DoD Instruction 5200.02, “Personnel Security Program” (available at *http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/corres/pdf/520002_2014.pdf*) and § 86.6.
( d ) Suitability and fitness determinations for individuals subject to this part will follow the guidance of Volume 731 of DoD Instruction 1400.25 for APF employees and Subchapter 1403 of DoD Instruction 1400.25 for NAF employees. Suitability and fitness are to be applied for the child care worker population in accordance with Volume 731 of DoD Instruction 1400.25 for appropriated fund employees in covered positions as defined by 5 CFR part 731.
( e ) Individuals who have received a favorable interim suitability or fitness determination based on the FBI criminal history background check are permitted to work under LOSS pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 13041(b)(3).
UNITED STATES ENVIRONY~AL P 

### RmmN D(



### Mr. Leroy Williams April 13.2007

Air

# oni it or in^ Project Leader Gila River Indian Community 

### Department of Environmental Quality 35 Pima Street Sacaton, Arizona 85247 

### SUBJECT; Rtiizour 

### ofthe 

### Pro* Plan 

### far the Ambient Air MonitoringProgram (USEPA QA 

### Office Document Control 

### Number AIRPOI2IQVl )
Dear Mr. Williams: 

### Thankyou for submittingthe Quality Assurance 

### Projact Plan (QAPP) for the 

### Gila River 

### Indian Community Ambient Air 

### Quality MonitoringProgram, 

### dated September 12, 2006. We have reviewed the plan and have approved it for collection of 

### environmental data. 

### One minor wmtion should 

### be made 

### to the PMlO @articulate

### mata 10

### microns or less in aerodynamic diameter) portion of the plan (Volume II). References to 40 CFR part 50, Appendix M should be 

### revised to read Apwx 

### J. 

### When EPA 

### revised the PMl 0 NAAQS 

### in 1997 we developed a new Appendix M detailingthe nfmce 

### method for measuring PMlO 

### in the atmosphere. 

### 'Ibis appendix was subsequently 

### rescinded by EPA as a result of a legal challenge to the revised PMlO NAAQS. The applicable appendix which details the reference

### method for PMlO 

### is 40 CFR 

### part 50, 

### Appendix 

### J. If pu have any questions 

### regardingEF'A quality 

### assurance

### requirementsplease contact Mathew Plate, USEPA Region 9 QA 

### Office at (415) 972-3799. 

### Questions rclgrrSt1gEfA amobht

### air III- roq.Pircmam&odd tmbctalto 

### Ech PYUIPjltO, USEPA Region 9 Air Division Technical Support 

### Office at (41

### 5) 947-4128. Again, we 

### appreciate your agency's efforts 

### in preparingthisplan. We 

### look forward to continuing to 

### work with 

### you 

### as this program progresses Sincerely,

Eugenia McNaughton, Manager Policy and Management Division Quality

### Assurance Ofiice Sean Hogan. Manager Air Division 

### TochnicaI Support Office
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED OCTOBER 16, 2014

NO. 03-14-00001-CV

Milton Lindsey, Appellant

v.

Kathryn Ramsey, Appellee

APPEAL FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, GOODWIN, AND FIELD

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION -- OPINION BY JUSTICE PURYEAR

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the trial court on October 3, 2013. Having 

reviewed the record, it appears that the Court lacks jurisdiction over the appeal. Therefore, the 

Court dismisses the appeal for want of jurisdiction. The appellant shall pay all costs relating to 

this appeal, both in this Court and the court below.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

MICHELLE AGRELLA COLEMAN, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-2066 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ___________________________________) Opinion filed December 21, 2018. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk County; Wayne M. Durden and J. Kevin Abdoney, Judges. Keith Peterson of the Law Offices of Peterson, P.A., Mulberry, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Elba Caridad Martin, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

SILBERMAN, KELLY, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                           5,168
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   26,569
<ALLOWANCES>                                       377
<INVENTORY>                                     17,097
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                51,886
<PP&E>                                         138,715
<DEPRECIATION>                                  55,274
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 153,726
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           24,706
<BONDS>                                         25,000
<COMMON>                                         8,802
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      89,923
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   153,726
<SALES>                                         93,890
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                93,890
<CGS>                                           70,379
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   84,484
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  44
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,362
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,575
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,787
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,787
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .65
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .65
        

</TABLE>
#### 1.202 Agency compliance with the FAR.

Agency compliance with the FAR (see 1.304) is the responsibility of the Secretary of Defense (for the military departments and defense agencies), the Administrator of General Services (for civilian agencies other than NASA), and the Administrator of NASA (for NASA activities).
### §3310a. Research equipment grants

#### (a) In general

The Secretary may make competitive grants for the acquisition of special purpose scientific research equipment for use in the food and agricultural sciences programs of eligible institutions.

#### (b) Maximum amount

The amount of a grant made to an eligible institution under this section may not exceed $500,000.

#### (c) Prohibition on charge or equipment as indirect costs

The cost of acquisition or depreciation of equipment purchased with a grant under this section shall not be—

(1) charged as an indirect cost against another Federal grant; or

(2) included as part of the indirect cost pool for purposes of calculating the indirect cost rate of an eligible institution.

#### (d) Eligible institutions defined

In this section, the term "eligible institution" means—

(1) a college or university; or

(2) a State cooperative institution.

#### (e) Authorization of appropriations

There is authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section $5,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2019 through 2023.

(Pub. L. 95–113, title XIV, §1462A, as added Pub. L. 115–334, title VII, §7126, Dec. 20, 2018, 132 Stat. 4794.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 3310a, Pub. L. 95–113, title XIV, §1462A, as added Pub. L. 107–171, title VII, §7402, May 13, 2002, 116 Stat. 456; amended Pub. L. 110–234, title VII, §7133, May 22, 2008, 122 Stat. 1228; Pub. L. 110–246, §4(a), title VII, §7133, June 18, 2008, 122 Stat. 1664, 1989, related to research equipment grants, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 113–79, title VII, §7118, Feb. 7, 2014, 128 Stat. 875.
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          22,315
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   20,878
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,621
<INVENTORY>                                      4,996
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                51,537
<PP&E>                                           7,685
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,195
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  68,088
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           18,294
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           117
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    68,088
<SALES>                                         18,102
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                18,102
<CGS>                                            7,054
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   16,754
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,679
<INCOME-TAX>                                       660
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,019
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,019
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.09
        



</TABLE>
### §2561. Remedy for infringement of plant variety protection

An owner shall have remedy by civil action for infringement of plant variety protection under section 2541 of this title. If a variety is sold under the name of a variety shown in a certificate, there is a prima facie presumption that it is the same variety.

(Pub. L. 91–577, title III, §121, Dec. 24, 1970, 84 Stat. 1556; Pub. L. 103–349, §13(t), Oct. 6, 1994, 108 Stat. 3144.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1994—Pub. L. 103–349 struck out "his" before "plant" in first sentence.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1994 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 103–349 effective 180 days after Oct. 6, 1994, see section 15 of Pub. L. 103–349, set out as a note under section 2401 of this title.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000032312
<NAME> EMCEE BROADCAST PRODUCTS, INC.
       
<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         398,339
<SECURITIES>                                 3,726,665
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,580,250
<ALLOWANCES>                                    45,000
<INVENTORY>                                  3,531,985
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             9,389,478
<PP&E>                                       2,881,601
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,068,456
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,490,936
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,011,672
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                        73,084
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                   8,675,120
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,490,936
<SALES>                                      2,198,765
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,198,765
<CGS>                                        1,542,337
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,228,390
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (51,549)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                11,711
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              17,507
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 21,974
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,500
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             16,474
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    16,474
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .00
        

</TABLE>
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, February 06, 2019.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, February 06, 2019

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A19D0294. FRED MILANI v. KATHLEEN IRWIN et al..

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of 

this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record 

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

LC NUMBERS:

17CV3176 17CV3115
TO:           Executive Officer

                Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services

FROM:       The Assistant Secretary

                Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services

SUBJECT:Delegation of Authority to Certify Fund Availability

I. DELEGATION

Under the authority from the Chief Financial Officer vested in my by delegation, EL/GEN/1, certified on December 3, 1998, I hereby delegate to you and to anyone serving for you in an acting capacity, the authority to certify funds available for administering the functions and responsibilities of the Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services.  This authority is issued pursuant to Title 31 of the U.S. Code, which governs the money and finances of the Department.

Unless otherwise noted in future delegations of authority, amendments to the authority delegated herein are included in the scope of this delegation. 

II. RESERVATIONS

None.

III. REDELEGATIONS

No further redelegation is authorized.  

IV. CERTIFICATION AND EFFECTIVE DATE

This delegation is effective upon certification by the Department’s Principal  Delegations Control Officer and supersedes all previous delegations of this authority.  I ratify actions within the scope of this delegation taken by addressees prior to the date of certification.

                                                       _________/s/_________

Troy R. Justesen, ED.D.

Delegated the authority

to perform the functions of

Assistant Secretary for Special

Education and Rehabilitative Services

**Certification Date:  4/9/2004**

**Departmental Delegations Control Officer:  /s/ Naty G. Beetle**

**Control Number:  EH/EH1/81**