alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of Clara Y. Hildreth et al., as Executrices of Ada B. Storm, Deceased.

Motions for a stay, consolidation, enlargement of time and for other relief granted only insofar as to permit the appeals in all four proceedings to he heard in one appeal book, without duplication of printing. That branch of the motions seeking to dispense with the printing in the record on appeal of the minutes of the hearing before the Referee is granted on condition that six typewritten copies of the minutes are filed with this court on or before August 14, 1962. In all other respects, the motions are denied. Motions to dismiss appeal granted, with $10 costs, unless the appellant procures the record on appeal and appellant’s points to be served and filed on or before August 14, 1962, with notice of argument for the September 1962 Term of this court, said appeal to be argued or submitted when reached. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, Valente, McNally and Eager, JJ.
#### STATE v. STARKIE

No. 605P97

Case below: 127 N.C.App. 757

Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 5 February 1998.
### §415c. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act May 17, 1928, ch. 602, §2, 45 Stat. 593, related to dissemination of information relating to wool and to the grading of wool, and was omitted from the Code as obsolete.
#### STATE v. JONES

No. 395A91-4

Case below: Wake County Superior Court

Motion by defendant (Jones) to hold petition for writ of certiorari/supersedeas in abeyance allowed 4 September 1997.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-1651

MARQUEL ALI,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

RALEIGH COUNTY; STEVEN TANNER, individually and in his official capacity 

as Sheriff of Raleigh County; CITY OF BECKLEY; GARY EPLING, individually 

and in his official capacity as detective with the Raleigh County Sheriff’s 

Department; DAVID SNUFFER, individually and in his official capacity as officer 

with the Beckley Police Department; KENNETH L. PACK, individually and in his 

official capacity as Corporal with the West Virginia State Police; JASON REDDEN, 

individually and in his official capacity as officer with the West Virginia Division of 

Corrections and subsequently Raleigh County Sheriff’s Department,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

RALEIGH COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT; BECKLEY POLICE 

DEPARTMENT; WEST VIRGINIA STATE POLICE,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at 

Beckley. Irene C. Berger, District Judge. (5:17-cv-03386)

Submitted: May 11, 2020 Decided: July 31, 2020
2

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, RICHARDSON, Circuit Judge, and SHEDD, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Hoyt Glazer, LAW OFFICE OF HOYT GLAZER, PLLC, Huntington, West Virginia, for 

Appellant. Victor Flanagan, Kevin John Robinson, Jared Coy Underwood, Chip Edward 

Williams, PULLIN, FOWLER, FLANAGAN, BROWN & POE, PLLC, Beckley, West 

Virginia; Michael Deering Mullins, Robert L. Bailey, STEPTOE & JOHNSON PLLC, 

Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

Marquel Ali appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to 

Defendants on Ali’s claims that he was wrongfully arrested as a result of an improper 

investigation and prosecution, in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2018), and related state 

law claims of abuse of process, malicious prosecution, negligent infliction of emotional 

distress, and intentional infliction of emotional distress. Ali also appeals the court’s order

denying leave to file a second amended complaint. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs 

and the joint appendix and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons 

stated by the district court. Ali v. Raleigh Cty., No. 5:17-cv-03386 (S.D.W. Va. Sept. 14, 

2018 & May 15, 2019). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
§ 811.1 Exceptions. The regulations in this part do not apply to: ( a ) Visual information (VI) materials made for the Air Force Office of Special Investigations for use in an investigation or a counterintelligence report. (See Air Force Instruction (AFI) 90-301, The Inspector General Complaints, which describes who may use these materials.)
( b ) VI materials made during Air Force investigations of aircraft or missile mishaps according to AFI 91-204, Safety Investigations and Reports. (See AFI 90-301.)
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned, MichaelP. McGee, the Chief Financial Officer of International Rectifier Corporation(the “Company”), pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, hereby certifies that:

(i)                                     theannual report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended June 30,2006 (the “Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(ii)                                  theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and forthe periods presented in the Report.
| Dated: September 15, 2006 |                                     |   |
|---------------------------|------------------------------------------|--------|
|                      |                                     |   |
|                      |                                     |   |
|                      | /s/ MICHAEL P. MCGEE                     |   |
|                      | Michael P. McGee                         |
|                      | Executive Vice President and             |
|                      | Chief Financial Officer                  |
|                      | (Principal Financial Accounting Officer) |

 

A signed original of the written statement required bySection 906 has been provided to International Rectifier Corporation and willbe furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

----
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Calvin Moore, Appellant.

[831 NYS2d 908]

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated May 16, 2006 *(People v Moore,*29 AD3d 825 [2006]), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered March 15, 2004.

Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel *(see Jones v Barnes,*463 US 745 [1983]; *People v Stultz,*2 NY3d 277 [2004]). Schmidt, J.P., Skelos, Lunn and Dillon, JJ., concur.
### §§3334, 3335. Repealed. Pub. L. 104–127, title VIII, §857, Apr. 4, 1996, 110 Stat. 1173

Section 3334, Pub. L. 95–113, title XIV, §1481, as added Pub. L. 97–98, title XIV, §1440(a), Dec. 22, 1981, 95 Stat. 1319, required Secretary to submit annual report to President and congressional committees outlining progress of Department of Agriculture in meeting program requirements set forth in section 3332 of this title.

Section 3335, Pub. L. 95–113, title XIV, §1482, as added Pub. L. 97–98, title XIV, §1440(a), Dec. 22, 1981, 95 Stat. 1319; amended Pub. L. 99–198, title XIV, §1430(a), Dec. 23, 1985, 99 Stat. 1556; Pub. L. 101–624, title XVI, §1601(b)(6), Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 3703, related to establishment of Rangeland Research Advisory Board.
### §437. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Apr. 21, 1948, ch. 224, §2, 62 Stat. 197, authorized Secretary of Agriculture to receive the property transferred by former section 436 of this title and directed the Secretary to administer it to best advance the livestock and agricultural interests of the United States, and was omitted from the Code as obsolete.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Authorization of Appropriations; Abolition of Army Remount Program

Act Apr. 21, 1948, ch. 224, §4, 62 Stat. 198, authorized appropriations to carry out former sections 436 to 438 of this title and abolished authority of Department of the Army to conduct a remount breeding program.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                       2,752,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               12,306,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   476,000
<INVENTORY>                                  8,394,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            32,604,000
<PP&E>                                      26,073,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              10,793,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              74,209,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        8,772,000
<BONDS>                                     22,068,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       150,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  40,878,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                74,209,000
<SALES>                                     30,865,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            30,865,000
<CGS>                                       17,302,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               17,302,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             9,311,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             380,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,938,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,378,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,560,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,560,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .32
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .31
        

</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of Michael Browne, Respondent, v. New York State Board of Parole et al., Appellants.

Motion by appellants for reargument and for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals, and cross motion by respondent to enforce the order appealed from, referred to the court that rendered the decision. Beldock, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur. Motion by appellants for reargument denied. Motion by appellants for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied. Cross motion by respondent to enforce the order appealed from denied, without prejudice. Nolan, P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Pette, JJ., concur.
11 TH C OURT OF A PPEALS E ASTLAND , T EXAS J UDGMENT

Joyce Janette Riddle

, * From the 42nd District Court of Taylor County, Trial Court No. 48,519

- A

.

Vs. No. 11

- 14

- 00146

- CV * October 1 , 2015

City of Abilene, * Opinion by Willson, J

. (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J., Willson , J. , and Bailey, J. )

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that t here

is no error in the order below. Therefore, in accordance with this court ’ s opinion, the order of the trial court is in all things affirmed. The costs incurred by reason of this appeal are taxed against Joyce Janette Riddle

.
July 9, 2012
Ms. Aloha Ley Office ofAviation Analysis 1200 NewJerseyAve., SE, W86-310 Washington, DC 20590 

### ?1**~** ... &

Re: Small CommunityAir Service Development Program Docket DOT-OST-2012-0069 Sarasota Bradenton International Airport (SRQ)
Dear Ms. Ley: Branch Banking andTrust Company

Scott M. Greer, Regional President Southwest Florida Region 18002nd Street, Suite 101 Sarasota, FL 34236 Office (941) 225-4316

I am writing as Regional President, Southwest Florida Region of Branch Banking & Trust Co. to express our strong support for the above referenced grant application to the Small Community Air Service Development Program. The recent decision by Southwest Airlines to pull AirTran se.rvice from SRQ is a major blow to the air service and economic competitiveness ofthe entire region served by Sarasota Bradenton International Airport. AirTran accounted for over 360,000 passengers ornearly 30% ofall passengertraffic at SRQ in 2011.
Sarasota Bradenton also suffers from a lack of access to a westbound airline gateway. This forces local consumers to drive to other airports, thereby inflicting economic damage on the local economy.



## . ' ' A 1997 Econ·omic ImpactStudy completed as part of the SRQ Master Plan Update revealed that 57% ofall enplanements at SRQ were out ofarea visitors spending an average of $665.00 · per visit. ·Using the CY 2011 AirTran passenger traffic, this equates to 102,600 visitors to the SRQ area. When combined with.the 100,000 passengers lost due to no westbound service, this equates to a loss of over $105,000,000 of direct visitor expenditures annually. When the multiplier effect is factored in, itequates to a Joss of nearly $285,000,000 of economic impact and 2,600jobsto the area.**~:** · The community is partnering with the airport to match the grant funds dollar for dollar on this

. critical matter. We ask the Department consider the serious negative effects the recent

approval provided to Southwest Airlines to acquire AirTran Airways has had on our community**~ ~(\ilication**  

### forassistance. Thank you foryourconsideration.

/scott

### M. Greer,

# ;;:xz, President

SouthwestFlorida Region Branch Banking & Trust Co.
Cc: The Honorable Ray H. LaHood Secretary ofTransportation United States Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJerseyAvenue, S.E. Washington, DC 20590
Order entered September 18, 2017.

In The



## Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 17

- 00678

- CR

THYREN CLENT JUSTUS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 3 63rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F

- 1653093

- W



### O RDER

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DIRECT the Clerk to issue the mandate in

this appeal INSTANTER

.

/s/ DAVID EVANS

JUSTICE
### **CHAPTER 26—AGRICULTURAL ADJUSTMENT**

#### SUBCHAPTER I—DECLARATION OF CONDITIONS AND POLICY

Sec.
601.
Declaration of conditions.
602.
Declaration of policy; establishment of price basing period; marketing standards; orderly supply flow; circumstances for continued regulation.

#### SUBCHAPTER II—COTTON OPTION CONTRACTS

603.
Government owned cotton; transfer to Secretary of Agriculture; powers of Secretary.
604.
Borrowing money; expenditures; authority of Secretary.
605, 606.
Repealed.
607.
Sale by Secretary; additional options; validation of assignments; publication of information.

#### SUBCHAPTER III—COMMODITY BENEFITS

608.
Powers of Secretary.
608–1.
Omitted.
608a.
Enforcement of chapter.
608a–1.
Repealed.
608b.
Marketing agreements; exemption from antitrust laws; inspection requirements for handlers not subject to agreements.
608c.
Orders.
608c–1.
Repealed.
608d.
Books and records.
608e.
Repealed.
608e–1.
Import prohibitions on specified foreign produce.
608f.
Repealed.
609.
Processing tax; methods of computation; rate; what constitutes processing; publicity as to tax to avoid profiteering.
610.
Administration.
611.
"Basic agricultural commodity" defined; exclusion of commodities.
612.
Appropriation; use of revenues; administrative expenses.
612a, 612b. Omitted.
612c.
Appropriation to encourage exportation and domestic consumption of agricultural products.
612c–1.
Authorization for appropriations to increase domestic consumption of surplus farm commodities.
612c–2.
Technical support to exporters and importers of United States agricultural products; scope of support provided by Department of Agriculture.
612c–3.
Repealed.
612c–4.
Purchase of specialty crops.
612c–5.
Section 612c funds for purchase of fruits, vegetables, and nuts to support domestic nutrition assistance programs.
612c–6.
Domestic food assistance programs.
613.
Termination date; investigations and reports.
613a.
Repealed.
614.
Separability.
615.
Refunds of tax; exemptions from tax; compensating tax; compensating tax on foreign goods; covering into Treasury.
616.
Stock on hand when tax takes effect or terminates.
617.
Refund on goods exported; bond to suspend tax on commodity intended for export.
618.
Existing contracts; imposition of tax on vendee; collection.
619.
Collection of tax; provisions of internal revenue laws applicable; returns.
619a.
Cotton tax, time for payment.
620.
Falsely ascribing deductions or charges to taxes; penalty.
621.
Machinery belting processed from cotton; exemption from tax.
622.
Omitted.
623.
Actions relating to tax; legalization of prior taxes.
624.
Limitation on imports; authority of President.
625.
Repealed.
626.
Import inventory.
627.
Dairy forward pricing pilot program.

#### SUBCHAPTER IV—REFUNDS

641 to 659. Omitted.
### §2233. Funds available for expenses of advisory committees

Funds available for carrying out the activities of the Department of Agriculture shall be available for expenses of advisory committees, including travel expenses in accordance with the provisions of section 5703 of title 5.

(Aug. 3, 1956, ch. 950, §4, 70 Stat. 1033.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

"Section 5703 of title 5" substituted in text for "section 5 of the Administrative Expenses Act of 1946, as amended" on authority of Pub. L. 89–554, §7(b), Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 631, the first section of which enacted Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.

Section was formerly classified to section 541c of Title 5 prior to the general revision and enactment of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees, by Pub. L. 89–554, §1, Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 378.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsThe control of float zone interfaces by the use of selected boundary conditionsThe main goal of the float zone crystal growth project of NASA's Materials Processing in Space Program is to thoroughly understand the molten zone/freezing crystal system and all the mechanisms that govern this system. The surface boundary conditions required to give flat float zone solid melt interfaces were studied and computed. The results provide float zone furnace designers with better methods for controlling solid melt interface shapes and for computing thermal profiles and gradients. Documentation and a user's guide were provided for the computer software.Document ID19840008949Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsFoster, L. M.*(Science Applications, Inc. Huntsville, AL, United States)*Mcintosh, J.*(Science Applications, Inc. Huntsville, AL, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 4, 2013Publication DateDecember 1, 1983Subject CategorySolid-State PhysicsReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.26:170959JA64NASA-CR-170959Accession Number84N17017Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 179-80-70CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS8-35108Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19840008949.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
### §6102. Definitions

As used in this chapter—

#### (1) Commerce

The term "commerce" means interstate, foreign, or intrastate commerce.

#### (2) Consumer information

The term "consumer information" means information and programs that will assist consumers and other persons in making evaluations and decisions regarding the purchase, preparation, and use of mushrooms.

#### (3) Council

The term "Council" means the Mushroom Council established under section 6104(b) of this title.

#### (4) Department

The term "Department" means the Department of Agriculture.

#### (5) First handler

The term "first handler" means any person, as described in an order issued under this chapter, who receives or otherwise acquires mushrooms from a producer and prepares for marketing or markets such mushrooms, or who prepares for marketing or markets mushrooms of that person's own production.

#### (6) Importer

The term "importer" means any person who imports, on average, over 500,000 pounds of mushrooms annually from outside the United States.

#### (7) Industry information

The term "industry information" means information and programs that are designed to lead to the development of new markets and marketing strategies, increased efficiency, and activities to enhance the image of the mushroom industry.

#### (8) Marketing

The term "marketing" means the sale or other disposition of mushrooms in any channel of commerce.

#### (9) Mushrooms

The term "mushrooms" means all varieties of cultivated mushrooms grown within the United States for the fresh market, or imported into the United States for the fresh market, that are marketed, except that such term shall not include mushrooms that are commercially marinated, canned, frozen, cooked, blanched, dried, packaged in brine, or otherwise processed, as may be determined by the Secretary.

#### (10) Person

The term "person" means any individual, group of individuals, partnership, corporation, association, cooperative, or any other legal entity.

#### (11) Producer

The term "producer" means any person engaged in the production of mushrooms who owns or who shares the ownership and risk of loss of such mushrooms and who produces, on average, over 500,000 pounds of mushrooms per year.

#### (12) Promotion

The term "promotion" means any action determined by the Secretary to enhance the image or desirability of mushrooms, including paid advertising.

#### (13) Research

The term "research" means any type of study to advance the image, desirability, marketability, production, product development, quality, or nutritional value of mushrooms.

#### (14) Secretary

The term "Secretary" means the Secretary of Agriculture.

#### (15) State and United States

The terms "State" and "United States" include the 50 States of the United States, the District of Columbia, and the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico.

(Pub. L. 101–624, title XIX, §1923, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 3855.)
#### The People of the State of New York v. Habib Riad Hawa.

Motion for an assignment of counsel granted to the extent of appointing Myron J. Greene, Esq., of 259 Broadway, New York 7, New York, and Robert M. Dubow, Esq., of 60 East 42nd Street, New York 17, New York, as counsel for the appellant for the purposes of the appeal. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, Valente and McNally, JJ.
#### The People of the State of New York v. Robert Johnson and Stamford Webb.

Enlargement of time granted. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, McNally, Eager and Steuer, JJ.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

WILLIAM M. USCHOCK AND DAVID

USCHOCK, CO-EXECUTORS OF THE

IRENE G. USCHOCK ESTATE,

 Petitioners

 v.

KRIEBEL GAS COMPANY AND RANGE

RESOURCES - APPALACHIA, LLC,

 Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 429 WAL 2014

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 23rd day of December, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of

Appeal is DENIED.