N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential.



# United States **Court of Appeals** 
**for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

CREATIVE TECHNOLOGY LTD., CREATIVE LABS, INC., Appellants

v.

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION, Appellee

GOOGLE LLC , MOTOROLA MOBILITY LLC, LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC., LENOVO GROUP LTD., BLACKBER RY LTD., BLACKBERRY CORPORATION, HTC CORPORATION, HTC AMERICA, INC., LG ELECTRONICS, INC., LG ELECTRONICS U.S.A., INC., L G ELECTRONICS MOBILECOMM U.S.A., I NC., SAMSUNG

ELECTRONICS CO., LTD ., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., SONY CORPORATION, SONY MO BILE COMMUNICATIONS INC., SONY MOBILE

COMMUNICATIONS AB, S ONY MOBILE

COMMUNICATIONS (USA) INC., ZTE CORPORATION, ZTE (US A) INC

., Intervenors

______________________

2016

- 2715

______________________Appeal from the United States International Trade Commission in Investigation No. 337

- TA

- 994.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

J ONATHAN D ANIEL B AKER , Farney Daniels PC, San Mateo, CA, argued for appellants. Also represented by

M ICHAEL D. S AUNDERS

, G URTEJ S INGH

.

H OUDA M ORAD , Office of the General Counsel, United States International Trade Commission, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by W AYNE W.

H ERRINGTON

, S IDNEY A. R OSENZWEIG

, D OMINIC L.

B IANCHI

.

D AN L. B AGATELL , Perkins Coie LLP, Hanover, NH

, argued for all intervenors. Intervenor s Google LLC , and Motorola Mobility LLC, Lenovo (United States) Inc., Lenovo Group Ltd., Blackberry Ltd., and Blackberry Corporation also represented by V ERONICA S USANA A SCARRUNZ , Wilson, Sonsini, Goodrich & Rosati, PC, Washington, DC . Intervenors Blackberry Ltd. and Blac kberry Corporation also represented by D ANIEL P. M UINO

, Morrison & Foerster LLP, Washington, DC; V INCENT J OSEPH B ELUSKO , Los Angeles, CA.

F RED W ILLIAMS , Vinson & Elkins LLP, Austin, TX, for intervenors HTC Corporation and HTC America, Inc. Also represen ted by J ONATHAN L LOYD H ARDT

.

S COTT A NDREW E LENGOLD , Fish & Richard son, PC, Washington, DC, for intervenors LG Electronics, Inc., LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc., and LG Electronics Mobilecomm U.S.A., Inc. Also represented by C HRISTIAN A. C HU

, M ICHAEL J. M C K EON

.3

R ICHARD L. R AINEY , Covington & Burling LLP, Was hington, DC, for intervenor s Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.

and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. Also represented by A LEXANDER C HINOY ; G REGORY S COTT N IEBERG , New York, NY; A LICE J UWON A HN , San Francisc o, CA.

M ICHAEL N. R ADER , Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, PC, Boston, MA, for intervenors Sony Corporation, Sony Mobile Communications Inc., Sony Mobile Communic ations AB, and Sony Mobile Communications (USA) Inc. Also represented by C HRISTOPHER H ENRY

, G ERALD B.

H RYCYSZYN ; J AMES A LTMAN

, B ARBARA A. M URPHY , Foster, Murphy, Altman & Nickel, PC, Washington, DC.

L YLE B RENT V ANDER S CHAAF , Brinks Gilson & Lione, Washington, DC, for intervenors ZTE Corporation and ZTE (USA) Inc. Also represented by J EFFREY J.
C ATALA NO

, R ALPH J OSEPH G ABRIC , Chicago, IL.

______________________

T HIS C AUSE having been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (N EWMAN

, H UGHES

, and S TOLL

, Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED

. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

October 13, 2017 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Date Peter R. Marksteiner
Clerk of Court