alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION**

# THE  DEPUTY SECRETARY

MEMORANDUM

TO:**Director, Executive Management Staff**

Office of the Secretary

Mitchell Dedert

Office of the Secretary

FROM:The Deputy Secretary

SUBJECT: Delegation of Authority to Certify Fund Availability

I. DELEGATION

Under the authority from the Chief Financial Officer vested in me by delegation EL/GEN/1, certified on December 3, 1998, I hereby delegate to you and to anyone serving for the Director, Executive Management Staff, in an acting capacity the authority to certify funds available for administering the functions and responsibilities of the Office of the Secretary. This authority is issued pursuant to Title 31 of the U.S. Code, which governs the money and finances of the Department.

Unless otherwise noted in future delegations of authority, amendments to the authority delegated herein are included in the scope of this delegation.

II. RESERVATIONS

None.

III. REDELEGATIONS

No further redelegation is authorized.

IV. CERTIFICATION AND EFFECTIVE DATE

This delegation is effective upon certification by the Department's Principal Delegations Control Officer and supersedes delegation EB/EA-1/122.  I ratify actions within the scope of this delegation taken by addressees prior to the date of certification.

__________/s/___________

                          William D. Hansen

OGC Clearance and Date:  /s/ Barry W. Stevens, 6/20/2003

Certified on:  6/25/2003

Departmental Delegations Control Officer:  /s/ Naty G. Beetle

Control Number:  **EA/EA-1/147**
Exhibit 13.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Elron Electronic Industries, Ltd. (the "Company") for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Yaron Elad, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(i)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(ii) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: March 10, 2013
/s/ Yaron Elad

Yaron Elad

Vice - President & Chief Financial Officer

(principal financial officer)
###### Editorial Note on Part 724

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 724 appear at 65 FR 62616, Oct. 19, 2000.

#### § 724.301 Mission.

To administer and supervise assigned boards and councils within the Department of the Navy.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

TERELL K. TILLMAN,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D18-3044

[December 12, 2019]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; John S. Kastrenakes, Judge; L.T. Case No. 50-2017-CF006189-AXXX-MB.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Ian Seldin, Assistant Public 

Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jessenia J. 

Concepcion, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

LEVINE, C.J., MAY and FORST, JJ., concur. 

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 10.1

[CIT LOGO]

               EQUIPMENT RENTAL AND FINANCE - US
               1540 W. FOUNTAINHEAD PKWY.
               TEMPE, AZ 85282


April 4, 2006

Avondale Mills, Inc.
506 South Broad Street
Monroe, GA  30655-2172

Attention:     Jack R. Altherr, Jr.

Re: Waiver pertaining to the Financial Reports and Covenant Rider (the "Rider")
to Master Security Agreement (the "Agreement") dated July 30, 2002 between
Avondale Mills, Inc. as Debtor, and The CIT Group/Equipment Financing, Inc. as
Secured Party.

Mr. Altherr:

Debtor has notified Secured Party that Debtor failed to comply with the Fixed
Charge Coverage Ratio under the Rider to the Agreement, during the second fiscal
quarter ending February 24, 2006, which failure would result in an Event of
Default under Section 9(b) of the Agreement. Secured Party agrees to waive the
non-compliance for this period only.

Provided, however, (i) the waiver set forth in this letter shall not constitute
an amendment of any covenant, or of any other Event of Default or event which
with notice or the passage of time or both would be an Event of Default under
the Agreement, (ii) the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect, and
unchanged except as set forth in this letter waiver and (iii) notwithstanding
the waiver for the non-compliance of the Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio covenant in
this letter, Debtor is hereby advised that the Secured Party shall demand strict
compliance by the Debtor with the terms of the Agreement at all times and the
Secured Party reserves all rights and remedies with respect thereto.

The effectiveness of this waiver shall be subject to the Secured Party's receipt
of a $5,000.00 amendment fee.

Please indicate your agreement with the foregoing by executing this letter and
returning it to the undersigned with the amendment fee no later than April 7,
2006.

THE CIT GROUP/EQUIPMENT FINANCING, INC.


By:
   ------------------------------
Title:  Senior Credit Analyst


AGREED TO:

Debtor:  Avondale Mills, Inc.               Guarantor:  Avondale Incorporated


By                                          By
   ------------------------------               ------------------------------

Title                                       Title
      ---------------------------                 ----------------------------
#### Merritt Corporation v. Milton A. Bass.

Motion for an extension of time and for other relief granted to the extent of directing plaintiff-appellant to serve and file a supplemental record which shall include all of the papers *924that were before the court on the original motion which resulted in the order of December 4, 1961, together with its appellant’s points on or before August 30, 1962, with notice of argument for September 11,1962, said appeal to be argued or submitted when reached. Respondents’ points are to be served and filed on or before September 5, 1962. The order of this court, entered on May 1, 1962 is modified accordingly. Concur — Botein, P. J., Stevens, Eager, Steuer and Bergan, JJ.
#### George Grunig, Respondent, v New York City Transit Authority, Appellant, and City of New York, Respondent.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, entered January 31, 1978, unanimously reversed, on the law and on the facts, vacated, and a new trial ordered on the issue of damages only, without costs or disbursements, unless plaintiff, within 20 days after service upon him of a copy of the order herein, with notice of entry, serves and files in the office of the clerk of the trial court a written stipulation consenting to reduce the verdict in his favor to $125,000 and to the entry of an amended judgment in accordance therewith. If plaintiff so stipulates, the judgment as so amended and reduced, is affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The damages awarded by the jury were excessive to the extent indicated. Concur-Birns, J. P., Silverman, Evans, Fein and Markewich, JJ.
#### Seymour Lehman et al., Respondents, v. Gabriel Lichtenstein et al., Appellants.

In a negligence action, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated April 27, 1960, granting plaintiffs’ motion for a preference pursuant to subdivision 3 of rule 151 of the Rules of Civil Practice. Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with leave to plaintiffs, if so advised, to make a new application on competent medical proof based on a recent physical examination and a showing that there is a probability that one of the plaintiffs will not survive the period of time required for the action to be reached for trial in its regular order. Mere severity of injuries is insufficient to warrant the exercise of the court’s discretion in granting a preference under this rule (Rules Civ. Prac., rule 151, subd. 3.) However, if there is a probability that one of the plaintiffs here will not survive the period of time required for the action to be *503reached for trial in its regular order, a new application may be made, based upon appropriate proof, as indicated above. Nolan, P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur.
#### Claridge Food Co., Inc., Respondent, v. Excelsior Quick Frosted Meat Products, Inc., Appellant.

In an action to recover damages for breach of contract, defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated May 16, 1960, denying its motion to dismiss the complaint, as amplified and limited by bills of particulars, for insufficiency. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Beldoek, Ughetta, Kleinfeld and Christ, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT N

Case: 1:11-cv-08987 Document #: 178-14 Filed: 04/21/16 Page 1 of 16 PageID #:2414
Case: 1:11-cv-08987 Document #: 178-14 Filed: 04/21/16 Page 2 of 16 PageID #:2415
Case: 1:11-cv-08987 Document #: 178-14 Filed: 04/21/16 Page 3 of 16 PageID #:2416
Case: 1:11-cv-08987 Document #: 178-14 Filed: 04/21/16 Page 4 of 16 PageID #:2417
Case: 1:11-cv-08987 Document #: 178-14 Filed: 04/21/16 Page 5 of 16 PageID #:2418
Case: 1:11-cv-08987 Document #: 178-14 Filed: 04/21/16 Page 6 of 16 PageID #:2419
Case: 1:11-cv-08987 Document #: 178-14 Filed: 04/21/16 Page 7 of 16 PageID #:2420
Case: 1:11-cv-08987 Document #: 178-14 Filed: 04/21/16 Page 8 of 16 PageID #:2421
Case: 1:11-cv-08987 Document #: 178-14 Filed: 04/21/16 Page 9 of 16 PageID #:2422
Case: 1:11-cv-08987 Document #: 178-14 Filed: 04/21/16 Page 10 of 16 PageID #:2423
Case: 1:11-cv-08987 Document #: 178-14 Filed: 04/21/16 Page 11 of 16 PageID #:2424
Case: 1:11-cv-08987 Document #: 178-14 Filed: 04/21/16 Page 12 of 16 PageID #:2425
Case: 1:11-cv-08987 Document #: 178-14 Filed: 04/21/16 Page 13 of 16 PageID #:2426
Case: 1:11-cv-08987 Document #: 178-14 Filed: 04/21/16 Page 14 of 16 PageID #:2427
Case: 1:11-cv-08987 Document #: 178-14 Filed: 04/21/16 Page 15 of 16 PageID #:2428
Case: 1:11-cv-08987 Document #: 178-14 Filed: 04/21/16 Page 16 of 16 PageID #:2429
#### In the Matter of Richard M. Mancuso, an Attorney.

Resignation accepted and name stricken from roll of attorneys. Present—Marsh, P. J., Cardamone, Simons, Hancock, Jr., and Schnepp, JJ.
EXHIBIT 32.1
            Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to
           18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
                        of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with this quarterly report of Espey Mfg. & Electronics  Corp. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period ended  September  30, 2009 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "report"),  I,
Howard Pinsley, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

      1.    The report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The  information  contained in this report fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

Date: November 11, 2009


                                               /s/Howard Pinsley
                                               -----------------------
                                               Howard Pinsley
                                               Chief Executive Officer


                                       16
4 Attachments 

Flare height - 25' 

Flare tip - 3" or 4" 

Enclosed Combustors - This is all the information that I have on them. 

If you need anything else, please let me know. 

Thanks, 

John McMichael 

Environmental Engineer 

XTO Energy, Inc 

810 Houston St. 

Ft Worth, TX 76102 

Office # 817.885.3782 

Cell # 817.584.7588 

Ft. Berthold Information Request 

John_McMichael 

to: 

Eric Wortman 

05/24/2012 12:29 PM 

Hide Details 

From: John_McMichael@xtoenergy.com

To: Eric Wortman/R8/USEPA/US@EPA

History: This message has been forwarded.

ECD description.pdf APT CIM1067 Final Report.pdf APT Cert 24 48.pdf APT Cert 30.pdf

Page 1 of 1

file://C:\Documents and Settings\ewortman\Local Settings\Temp\notes0BDDB2\~web560... 7/13/2012
# OAR Box 1793 Prepped by Keeia Richards



## Document

Number: 

# 2 ) ll-F-44 Docket Number: 

# A-90-3 7

Printed 11/3/2008 11:31:54

AM 

### Sheet 2 of 45 p. 1P. 2 TRANSMISSIO NRESUL T REPOR T (OC T 0 2 '9 5 03:29PM) * ITPID-IIG/OP G
• ' (AUTO ) TH E FOLLOWING FILE(S ) ERASE D FIL E FIL E TYP E OPTIO NTE L NO . PAG E RESUL T 064 MEMOR Y T X . 91202395728 5 12/1 2 O K 

# /.-90-3 7 

# 3T-F - /V»po- W cl -P f •J l/n 

# 4 ^ ^H-fi s K^m^e-X

ERROR S 1 ) HANG U P O R LIN E FAI L 2 ) BUS Y 3 ) N O ANSWE R 4 ) N O FACSIMIL E CONNECTIO N



## «IA * 

# tot»«ritid Implementatio nGrou p (MD-12 )

Infonnatio nTransfer

an dProgramIntegratio nDi v Pffic e of Ai r Qualit y Plannin g ^ standard s • ' U . S . Environmenta

i Protectio nAgenc y Researc hTriangl e Park , N C 277 U FAX Number : (919)541.550 9

UWOFFICf

i HVhOEX


## FROM : M______

_ ____ " •_*-*-_—.'__. '
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> UT
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                        1,326
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                        851
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                           1,770
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                            69
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                     261
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   4,277
<COMMON>                                             0
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                        1,022
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                               (80)
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                     942
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              146
<PREFERRED>                                         75
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                               972
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   1
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                        0
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                   2,141
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                    4,277
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                        2,738
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                              (20)
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                       2,758
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                       2,758
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                           (20)
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                   9
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                    (11)
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            57
<NET-INCOME>                                      (47)
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                          3
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                     (50)
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                             0
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                            0
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                            (20)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Exhibit31.1          

> 
Certification

 

I, William G. Rankin, certify that:

1.
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of UQM      Technologies, Inc.:
2.
Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not      contain any untrue statement of material fact or omit to state a material      fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances      under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the      period covered by this annual report;
3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and      other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present      in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations      and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in      this annual report;
4.
The registrant's other certifying officers and I are      responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and      procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for      the registrant and we have:
a.
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or      caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our      supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the      registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us      by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which      this annual report is being prepared;
b.
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's      disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this annual report our      conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and      procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this annual report      based on such evaluation; and
c.
Disclosed in this annual report our conclusion about      the effectiveness of the internal controls based on our evaluation as well      as any change in the registrant's internal control over financial      reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal      quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual      report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to      materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial      reporting; and
5.
The registrant's other certifying officers and I have      disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over      financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit      committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing      the equivalent functions):
a.
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in      the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which      are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to      record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b.
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves      management or other employees who have a significant role in the      registrant's internal controls over financial reporting.
Date:  May 21, 2008
/s/  William G. Rankin  
William G. Rankin  
Chairman, President and
Chief Executive Officer
THREE-FIVE SYSTEMS, INC.
                 STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
                             EXHIBIT 11 (UNAUDITED)



                                                             THREE MONTHS
                                                            ENDED MARCH 31,
                                                       -------------------------

                                                          1997           1996
                                                       ----------     ----------

Common shares outstanding beginning of period           7,757,329      7,735,745

Effect of Weighting Shares:
  Employee stock options exercised                          1,850            855
  Employee stock options outstanding                      288,557        303,194
                                                       ----------     ----------

Primary                                                 8,047,736      8,039,794
                                                       ==========     ==========



Common shares outstanding beginning of period           7,757,329      7,735,745

Effect of Weighting Shares:
  Employee stock options exercised                          1,850            855
  Employee stock options outstanding                      288,557        303,195
                                                       ----------     ----------

Fully diluted                                           8,047,736      8,039,795
                                                       ==========     ==========


Net income                                             $  801,000     $  722,000
                                                       ==========     ==========


EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE AND
  COMMON SHARE EQUIVALENT:

Earnings per share

  Primary                                              $     0.10     $     0.09
                                                       ==========     ==========
  Fully diluted                                        $     0.10     $     0.09
                                                       ==========     ==========
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AU GUST 28, 2015

NO. 03

- 15

- 00456

- CR

Codus Clifton O’ Neill, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 22ND DISTRICT COURT OF HAYS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, GOODWIN, AND BOURLAN D
DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE BOURLAND

This is an appeal from the order signed by the tr i a l court. Having reviewed the record, it appears

that the Court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal. Therefore, th e Court dismisses the appeal for

want of jurisdiction

. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of

costs is made.
CAS Sanitized
The State 

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 29, 2014

No. 04-13-00769-CR

Juan Boaerge RIVERA,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the Criminal District Court 4, Tarrant County, Texas

Trial Court No. 1197727D

The Honorable Michael Thomas, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Sandee Brian Marion, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

The panel has considered the Appellant’s Motion for Rehearing and the motion is 

DENIED.

 PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: ______________________

 Keith E. Hottle, Clerk

 Clerk of Court
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. 

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit 

__________________________ 

INGENIADOR, LLC, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v. 

INTERWOVEN, INC., HEWLETT-PACKARD 

COMPANY, MICROSOFT CORPORATION, 

OBJECTIVE CORPORATION USA, INC., 

ORACLE CORPORATION, SAP AMERICA, INC., 

AND SPRINGCM, INC., 

Defendants, 

AND 

BRIDGELINE DIGITAL, INC., 

Defendant, 

AND

ALFRESCO SOFTWARE, INC., 

Defendant, 

AND

BLACKBOARD, INC., 

Defendant, 

AND

EMC CORPORATION, 

Defendant, 

AND

INFORMATICA CORPORATION, 

Case: 12-1497 Document: 94 Page: 1 Filed: 12/12/2012
INGENIADOR, LLC V. INTERWOVEN, INC. 2

Defendant, 

AND

COMPULINK MANAGEMENT CENTER, INC., 

Defendant-Appellee, 

AND

LEXMARK INTERNATIONAL, INC., 

Defendant, 

AND

NUXEO CORPORATION, 

Defendant, 

AND

SDL TRIDION, INC., 

Defendant. 

__________________________ 

2012-1497, -1515 

__________________________ 

Appeals from the United States District Court for the 

District of Puerto Rico in case no. 11-CV-1840, Judge 

Gustavo A. Gelpi. 

__________________________ 

ON MOTION 

__________________________ 

O R D E R 

Ingeniador, LLC moves to substitute Eugenio TorresOyola as principal counsel. Cristina Arenas-Solis will 

remain as of counsel for Ingeniador, LLC. 

Upon consideration thereof, 

Case: 12-1497 Document: 94 Page: 2 Filed: 12/12/2012
3 INGENIADOR, LLC V. INTERWOVEN, INC. 

IT IS ORDERED THAT: 

The motion is granted. Eugenio Torres-Oyola and 

Cristina Arenas-Solis should promptly file amended 

entries of appearance. 

 FOR THE COURT

 /s/ Jan Horbaly 

 Jan Horbaly 

 Clerk 

s21 

Case: 12-1497 Document: 94 Page: 3 Filed: 12/12/2012