alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §2207c. Annual report on work of agricultural experiment stations and of college extension work; publication and distribution

There shall be prepared by the Department of Agriculture an annual report on the work and expenditures of the agricultural experiment stations established under the Act of Congress of March second, eighteen hundred and eighty-seven [7 U.S.C. 361a et seq.], on the work and expenditures of the Department of Agriculture in connection therewith, and on the cooperative agricultural extension work and expenditures of the Department of Agriculture and of agricultural colleges under the Act of May eighth, nineteen hundred and fourteen [7 U.S.C. 341 et seq.], and there shall be printed annually eight thousand copies of said report, of which one thousand copies shall be for the use of the Senate, two thousand copies for the use of the House of Representatives, and five thousand copies for the use of the Department of Agriculture.

(Mar. 4, 1915, ch. 144, 38 Stat. 1110.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Act of Congress of March second, eighteen hundred and eighty-seven, referred to in text, is act Mar. 2, 1887, ch. 314, 24 Stat. 440, known as the Hatch Act, which is classified generally to sections 361a to 361i of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 361a of this title and Tables.

The Act of May eighth, nineteen hundred and fourteen, referred to in text, is act May 8, 1914, ch. 79, 38 Stat. 372, known as the "Smith-Lever Act", and also known as the "Agricultural Work Extension Act", which is classified generally to subchapter IV (§341 et seq.) of chapter 13 of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 341 of this title and Tables.

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 418 of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

Functions of all officers, agencies, and employees of Department of Agriculture transferred, with certain exceptions, to Secretary of Agriculture by 1953 Reorg. Plan No. 2, §1, eff. June 4, 1953, 18 F.R. 3219, 67 Stat. 633, set out as a note under section 2201 of this title.
§ 750.63 Definitions. ( a ) *Civilian official or employee.* Any civilian employee of the DON paid from appropriated funds at the time of the incident.
( b ) *Vehicle.* Includes every description of carriage or other artificial contrivance used, or capable of being used, as a means of transportation on land. See 1 U.S.C. 4.
( c ) *Government installation.* Any Federal facility having fixed boundaries and owned or controlled by the U.S. Government. It includes both military bases and nonmilitary installations.
### §2242b. Translation of publications into foreign languages

On and after October 28, 1991, funds appropriated to the Department of Agriculture by this Act may be used for translation of publications of the Department of Agriculture into foreign languages when determined by the Secretary to be in the public interest.

(Pub. L. 102–142, title VII, §721, Oct. 28, 1991, 105 Stat. 913.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This Act, referred to in text, is Pub. L. 102–142, Oct. 28, 1991, 105 Stat. 878, known as the Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 1992. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables.
### §2009k. Rural development interagency working group

#### (a) In general

The Secretary shall provide leadership within the Executive branch for, and assume responsibility for, establishing an interagency working group chaired by the Secretary.

#### (b) Duties

The working group shall establish policy for, coordinate, make recommendations with respect to, and evaluate the performance of, all Federal rural development efforts.

(Pub. L. 87–128, title III, §381L, as added Pub. L. 104–127, title VII, §761, Apr. 4, 1996, 110 Stat. 1146.)
From: "leslie.riegle@aia-aerospace.org" <leslie.riegle@aia-aerospace.org>

To: "Lourdes.Maurice@faa.gov" <Lourdes.Maurice@faa.gov>

Cc: Curtis Holsclaw <Curtis.Holsclaw@faa.gov>, "Ralph.Iovinelli@faa.gov" <Ralph.Iovinelli@faa.gov>, 

Margo Oge/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Christopher Grundler/AA/USEPA/US@EPA, Rich 

Wilcox/AA/USEPA/US@EPA, Glenn Passavant/AA/USEPA/US@EPA, "Kevin.Welsh@faa.gov" 

<Kevin.Welsh@faa.gov>, Dan Elwell <dan.elwell@aia-aerospace.org>

Date: 02/23/2012 04:59 PM

Subject: RE: NOx Emission Standards and Production Cut-Off

Lourdes, et al.,

Please see the attached letter urging the FAA, EPA and OMB to expedite the 

rulemaking for the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) Proposed Rule, 

“Control of Air Pollution From Aircraft and Aircraft Engines; Proposed 

Emission Standards and Test Procedures”.

We would like to offer any assistance that is appropriate to achieve this 

end. As mentioned in the letter, we intend to get back with you in further 

detail regarding the 6-step process that was proposed.

I appreciate your patience, and hope this matter is resolved quickly and in a 

way that does not cause unnecessary complication.

Thank you,

Leslie

Leslie Riegle

Director, Civil Aviation Environment & Security

Aerospace Industries Association

1000 Wilson Blvd., Suite 1700

Arlington, VA 22209

(703) 358-1088

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

This communication, including any attachments, consists of non-public 

information that is intended solely for use of the individual or entity to 

which it is addressed. It is a Confidential communication that may contain 

information that is proprietary, privileged and exempt from disclosure under 

applicable law. If the reader is not the intended recipient, or agent 

responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, please 

notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete the communication, 

including any attachments, from your system without saving any information or 

making any physical copies. Unauthorized use, dissemination, distribution or 

copying of this communication, including any attachments, is strictly 
prohibited.

[attachment "Letter to FAA RE EPA's NOx NPRM 2_23_2012.pdf]
§ 776.19 Principles. Subpart B of this part is based on the following principles. Interpretation of subpart B of this part should flow from their common meaning. To the extent that any ambiguity or conflict exists, subpart B of this part should be interpreted consistent with these general principles. ( a ) Covered attorneys shall: ( 1 ) Obey the law and applicable military regulations, and counsel clients to do so.
( 2 ) Follow all applicable ethics rules.
( 3 ) Protect the legal rights and interests of clients, organizational and individual.
( 4 ) Be honest and truthful in all dealings.
( 5 ) Not derive personal gain, except as authorized, for the performance of legal services.
( 6 ) Maintain the integrity of the legal profession.
( b ) Ethical rules should be consistent with law. If law and ethics conflict, the law prevails unless an ethical rule is constitutionally based.
( c ) The military criminal justice system is a truth-finding process consistent with constitutional law.
#### Annette Kruglikov, Respondent, v. Samuel Kruglikov, Appellant.

- - Appeal unanimously dismissed, without costs. Memorandum: In view of the authority of *Brown*v. *Golden*(6 A D 2d 766) we must hold that the order-sought to be appealed from is not an appealable order. (Appeal from order of Queens Special Term, entered in Monroe County sustaining the objection of the witness Rabbi Ben Zion Bokser to a question upon an examination before trial on the ground of privilege.) Present — Bastow, J. P., Goldman, Halpern, McClusky and Henry, JJ. [29 Misc 2d 17.]
Order entered October 14, 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 15
- 00454
- CR
WILLIAM THOMAS NICHO LAS JR, Appellant
V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the County Criminal Court No. 10

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. MC15
- A0588
- L



### O RDER
T h e Court GRANTS the State’s second motion for extension of time to file the State’s
brief.
We ORDER the Clerk of the Court to file the State’s brief tendered as of the date of this
order.

/s/ DAVID L. BRIDGES P RESIDING JUSTICE
# U ni te d S ta te s Co ur t of A pp ea ls For the Eig hth Circu it

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ No. 1 6- 38 66

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ Ran da l M au de rer ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Pla in ti

ff - App el la nt

v. Io wa Att or ne y

Gene ral ’s Offic e, etal.
ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Defe nd

an ts - App el le es

__ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co ur t fo r th e So ut he rn Dis tri ctof I owa - Des M oi ne s

__ __ __ __ __ __ Subm it te d: Marc h 2 3, 2 01 7 Fi le d: Marc h 2 8, 2 01 7 [Un publ is he d]

__ __ __ __ __ __ Befo re WOL LMAN, BOW MAN, an d LOKEN, Circ ui t J ud ge s.

__ __ __ __ __ __ PER CURI AM.

Ran da l Mau de rer ap pe al s aft er th e di st ric t co ur t di sm is se d hi s pr o se 42 U.S.C. 1 § 19 83 act io n, in whi ch he al le ge d t h a t h is reco m m en de d pa rti ci pa ti on in a Sex

The Hon or ab le Reb ecca Ebi ng er, Uni te d St at es D ist ri ct Judg e fo r th e So ut he rn 1 Dis tri ctof I owa
.Offen de r Treat m en t Pr ogr am vio late d his co nst it ut io na l rig ht s; an d th at th e co nd it io ns

of hi s ex erci se pr iv il eg es whi le in se gr eg at io n vi ol at ed bo th hi s co ns ti tu ti on al rig ht s an d th e Am eri can s with Dis ab il it ie s Act. W e co nc lu de th at th e act io n was pro pe rly di sm is se d fo r th e reas on s st at ed by th e di st ric t co ur t. See Co op er v. Sch rir o, 18 9 F.3 d 78 1, 78 3 (8 th Ci r. 19 99 ) (p er cu ria m ) (§ 19 15 A(b ) d is m is sa l is rev ie wed de no vo ). Acco rd in gl y , we affi rm , see 8t h C ir. R . 47 B, an d we d en y th e ap pe ll at e m ot io ns
.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __

-2

-
Z: \ data \ SIP \ Connecticut \ 8 hour Ozone Redesignation \ MARMA 2007 Appendices

Name Size Type Last Modified

marama_2007_appendices.zip 2,034KB WinZip File 1/10/2013 10:57 AM

Appendix A CAMD to NIF Crosswalk Aug12_2010.xls 1,344KB Microsoft Office Excel 97-2003 Worksheet 2/8/2012 10:44 AM

Appendix B Technical Memorandum - EFs for CPM from EGUs.doc 302KB Microsoft Office Word 97 - 2003 Document 2/8/2012 10:44 AM

Appendix C SCC_Control_Device_PM_Ratios.xls 574KB Microsoft Office Excel 97-2003 Worksheet 2/8/2012 10:44 AM

Appendix D Stack_SCC_Defaults.xls 428KB Microsoft Office Excel 97-2003 Worksheet 2/8/2012 10:44 AM

Appendix E VDEQ Conceptual Description for DG draft March 15, 2010.doc 1,579KB Microsoft Office Word 97 - 2003 Document 2/8/2012 10:44 AM

Appendix F NESCAUM 2007 2020 MOVES modeling 20111209 PM.doc 924KB Microsoft Office Word 97 - 2003 Document 2/8/2012 10:44 AM

Appendix G Stage_II_Controls.xlsx 38KB Microsoft Office Excel Worksheet 2/8/2012 10:44 AM

Appendix H MANEVU_VA SMOKE QA Memo 17Dec2010.doc 1,041KB Microsoft Office Word 97 - 2003 Document 2/8/2012 10:44 AM
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

TIMOTHY D. REUBEN,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Defendant - Appellee.

No. 13-55240

D.C. No. 2:11-cv-09448-SJOPJW

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

S. James Otero, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted April 9, 2015

Pasadena, California

Before: REINHARDT, McKEOWN, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Timothy Reuben appeals the denial of a tax refund from the Internal

Revenue Service for the sale of stock received as part of a mutual life insurance

company’s demutualization. Reuben appeals the district court’s order granting the

government’s motion for summary judgment based on Reuben’s failure to

FILED

JAN 05 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
establish that his basis in the stock was other than zero. For the reasons set forth in

Dorrance v. United States, No. 13-16548, 2015 WL 8241954 (9th Cir. Dec. 9,

2015), we hold that the district court properly found that Reuben was not entitled

to a refund and affirm the judgment. 

AFFIRMED.
### Part B—Transfer of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms to the Department of Justice
Editorial Note on Part 842
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 842 appear at 81 FR 83688, Nov. 22, 2016.

§ 842.62 Filing a claim. ( a ) *Claims arising in a foreign country.* ( 1 ) If a third party claimant tries to file an international agreement claim with Air Force, direct that person to the appropriate receiving State office.
( 2 ) If the Air Force receives a claim, send it to the U.S. sending State office for delivery to the receiving State.
( b ) *Claims arising in the United States.* The claimant files tort claims arising from the act or omission of military or civilian personnel of another contracting party at any U.S. military installation. The Staff Judge Advocate for the installation where such military or civilian personnel is assigned or attached will promptly notify the Foreign Claims Branch of USAF/JACC as well as the Commander, U.S. Army Claims Service. If the claimant files said claim at an installation other than the location where said military or civilian personnel is assigned, the Staff Judge Advocate for that installation will promptly forward the claim to the appropriate installation Staff Judge Advocate.
[55 FR 2809, Jan. 29, 1990. Redesignated and amended at 81 FR 83694, 83695, Nov. 22, 2016]
#### § 1909.3 Contact for general information and requests.

For general information on this part, to inquire about access to CIA information under this part, or to make a formal request for such access, please direct your communication in writing to the Information and Privacy Coordinator, Central Intelligence Agency, Washington, DC 20505. Inquiries will also by accepted by facsimile at (703) 613-3007. For general information only, the telephone number is (703) 613-1287. Collect calls cannot be accepted.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
this schedule contains financial information extracted from Cash Plus I
financial statements for the year ended December 31, 1996 and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       4,043,066
<SECURITIES>                                 4,373,246
<RECEIVABLES>                                  417,867<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               198,512
<PP&E>                                      46,250,872
<DEPRECIATION>                            (17,342,753)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              37,940,810
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          916,358
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    37,024,452<F2>
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                37,940,810
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,333,585
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,964,396<F3>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,369,189<F4>
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0<F4>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0<F4>
<FN>
<F1>Includes all receivables included in "other assets" on the balance sheet.
<F2>Represents total deficit of the General Partners ($165,258) and equity of the
Limited Partners $37,189,710.
<F3>Includes operating expenses of $1,988,325, real estate taxes of $931,586 and
depreciation expense of $2,044,485.
<F4>Net income allocated to General Partners $1,341,806 for the year ended
December 31, 1996.  Average net income is $.34 per unit.
</FN>


</TABLE>
#### § 935.164 Boat operations.

The operator of each boat used at Wake Island shall conform to the limitations on its operations as the Commander may prescribe in the public interest.
### §8403. Relationship to the Social Security Act

Except as otherwise provided in this chapter, the benefits payable under the System are in addition to the benefits payable under the Social Security Act.

(Added Pub. L. 99–335, title I, §101(a), June 6, 1986, 100 Stat. 522.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Social Security Act, referred to in text, is act Aug. 14, 1935, ch. 531, 49 Stat. 620, which is classified generally to chapter 7 (§301 et seq.) of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 1305 of Title 42 and Tables.
1 The HONORABLE CAROL E. JACKSON, Chief Judge of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 02-2599

___________ Blake E. Anderson; Deborah Sue * Anderson, * * Appellants, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the v. * Eastern District of Missouri. * Madison County Commissioners; * [UNPUBLISHED] David L. Lewis, Sheriff; et al., * * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: March 7, 2003 Filed: March 17, 2003

___________ Before BOWMAN, WOLLMAN, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Missouri inmate Blake Anderson (Blake) and his non-inmate wife Deborah (Deborah), appeal the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment dismissing their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against various officials and employees of the Madison County Jail. Having carefully reviewed the record, we conclude that the evidence presented below failed to establish a trialworthy issue as to Blake’s or Deborah’s-2- inadequate-medical-care claims, or as to Deborah’s excessive-force claim. We do not address claims the Andersons abandoned or first raise on appeal. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
#### Belle Shapiro, Appellant, v. Herman Josephson et al., Respondents.

. Judgment unanimously affirmed, without costs to either party. No opinion. Order entered on May 10, 1960, denying plaintiff’s motion for a new trial unanimously affirmed, without costs to either party. No opinion. Order entered on April 1, 1959, denying plaintiff’s motion for a copy of the stenographic minutes of the trial unanimously affirmed, without costs to either party. No opinion. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Valente, Eager and Bergan, JJ.
### §§2211b to 2212c. Repealed. Pub. L. 103–354, title II, §§218(e)(2)–(6), 231(f)(1), Oct. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 3213, 3219

Section 2211b, Pub. L. 96–355, §3(a), Sept. 24, 1980, 94 Stat. 1173, authorized appointment of an Under Secretary of Agriculture for Small Community and Rural Development.

Section 2212, acts Feb. 9, 1889, ch. 122, §2, 25 Stat. 659; June 30, 1906, ch. 3913, 34 Stat. 670, authorized appointment of an Assistant Secretary of Agriculture.

Section 2212a, Pub. L. 92–419, title VI, §604(a), Aug. 30, 1972, 86 Stat. 676, authorized appointment of an additional Assistant Secretary of Agriculture.

Section 2212b, Pub. L. 94–561, §2, Oct. 19, 1976, 90 Stat. 2643, authorized appointment of an additional Assistant Secretary of Agriculture.

Section 2212c, Pub. L. 97–325, §8(a), Oct. 15, 1982, 96 Stat. 1605, authorized appointment of an additional Assistant Secretary of Agriculture.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 525 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 525

  To require the United States Postal Service to designate a single, 
              unique ZIP code for particular communities.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 2, 2017

Mrs. Gillibrand (for herself and Mr. Schumer) introduced the following 
 bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland 
                   Security and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To require the United States Postal Service to designate a single, 
              unique ZIP code for particular communities.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ZIP CODES.

    Not later than 270 days after the date of enactment of this Act, 
the United States Postal Service shall designate a single, unique ZIP 
code for, as nearly as practicable, the communities of Flanders, 
Northampton, and Riverside in the Town of Southampton, New York.
                                 <all>
```
§ 776.53 Responsibilities of the Judge Advocate General and supervisory attorneys. ( a ) The JAG and supervisory attorneys shall make reasonable efforts to ensure that all covered attorneys conform to subpart B of this part.
( b ) A covered attorney having direct supervisory authority over another covered attorney shall make reasonable efforts to ensure that the other attorney conforms to subpart B of this part.
( c ) A supervisory attorney shall be responsible for another subordinate covered attorney's violation of subpart B of this part if: ( 1 ) The supervisory attorney orders or, with knowledge of the specific conduct, ratifies the conduct involved; or
( 2 ) The supervisory attorney has direct supervisory authority over the other attorney and knows of the conduct at a time when its consequences can be avoided or mitigated but fails to take reasonable remedial action.
( d ) A supervisory attorney is responsible for ensuring that the subordinate covered attorney is properly trained and is competent to perform the duties to which the subordinate covered attorney is assigned.
( e ) [Reserved]
### §2208a. Loan levels provided to Department of Agriculture

On and after November 10, 2005, loan levels provided in this or any other Appropriations Act to the Department of Agriculture shall be considered estimates, not limitations.

(Pub. L. 109–97, title VII, §710, Nov. 10, 2005, 119 Stat. 2150.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in the following prior appropriation acts:

Pub. L. 108–447, div. A, title VII, §711, Dec. 8, 2004, 118 Stat. 2839.

Pub. L. 108–199, div. A, title VII, §711, Jan. 23, 2004, 118 Stat. 32.

Pub. L. 108–7, div. A, title VII, §711, Feb. 20, 2003, 117 Stat. 39.

Pub. L. 107—76, title VII, §711, Nov. 28, 2001, 115 Stat. 733.

Pub. L. 106—387, §1(a) [title VII, §711], Oct. 28, 2000, 114 Stat. 1549, 1549A–29.

Pub. L. 106–78, title VII, §712, Oct. 22, 1999, 113 Stat. 1162.

Pub. L. 105–277, div. A, §101(a) [title VII, §712], Oct. 21, 1998, 112 Stat. 2681–26.

Pub. L. 105–86, title VII, §713, Nov. 18, 1997, 111 Stat. 2106.

Pub. L. 104–180, title VII, §713, Aug. 6, 1996, 110 Stat. 1598.

Pub. L. 104–37, title VII, §713, Oct. 21, 1995, 109 Stat. 330.

Pub. L. 103–330, title VII, §713, Sept. 30, 1994, 108 Stat. 2468.

Pub. L. 103–111, title VII, §721, Oct. 21, 1993, 107 Stat. 1080.