alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

OFFICE OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE ACQUISITION, LANGUAGE ENHANCEMENT

ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT FOR LIMITED INGLISH PROFICIENT STUDENTS

MEMORANDUM

TO: The Executive Officer

Office of Elementary and Secondary Education

FROM: The Assistant Deputy Secretary and Director

Off ice of English Language Acquisition

SUBJECT: Delegation of Authority

I. DELEGATION

While the position of Executive Officer in the Office of English Language Acquisition

(OELA) is vacant, I designate you as Acting Executive Officer of OELA and delegate to 

you the authority to perform the administrative and management functions and duties of 

the position. 

II. RESERVATIONS

None.

III. REDELEGATION

No further redelegation is authorized.

IV. CERTIFICATION AND EFFECTIVE DATE

This delegation is effective upon certification of the Department's Principal Delegations 

Control Officer. It remains in effect until further notice or the position is filled. 

I hereby ratify actions within the scope of this delegation taken by you prior to the date of 

certification.

_____________/s/____________ 

 Rosalinda Barrera

OGC Clearance and Date: /s/ Tracey Sasser, 10/22/2010

Certified Date: 11/2/2010

Departmental Delegations Control Officer: /s/ Naty G. Beetle

Control Number: ET/ES1/84
### Part M—Intent and Severability
**EXHIBIT 31.2****CERTIFICATION**I, Lonnie J. Lowry, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Panhandle Oil and Gas Inc.(the Company);  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleadingwith respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;  4. The Company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the Company and have: a).  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the Company, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b).  Designed such internal control over financial reporting, orcaused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under oursupervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability offinancial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for externalpurposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;  c).  Evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  d).  Disclosed in this report any change in the Company’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the Company’s fourthfiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The Company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Company’sauditors and the audit committee of the Company’s board of directors: a).  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the Company’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and  b).  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the Company’s internal controlover financial reporting.     /s/ Lonnie J. Lowry   Lonnie J. Lowry   Chief Financial Officer   Date: December 11, 2007
(60)
(May 27, 1964)

#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Gerald H. Rogers, Appellant.

At about 9:00 p.m. on August 28,1959, one Maude Judson, an aged lady, was allegedly robbed at gunpoint in her home in Horseheads, *721New York. Following her identification of defendant as the perpetrator of the act he was indicted by a Grand Jury for the crimes of robbery in the first degree, grand larceny in the first degree, carrying a concealed loaded pistol without a written license therefor and assault in the second degree. Under a waiver of his right to a jury trial (N. Y. Const., art. I, § 2) defendant was tried before the County Court of Chemung County and convicted of robbery and grand larceny as charged in the indictment and of the misdemeanor of carrying a concealed weapon. The trial court held that the charge of assault merged with the crime of robbery and accordingly dismissed this count of the indictment. Upon appeal defendant argues that the trial court erred in permitting two members of the State Police to testify that some days after the event the complaining witness had identified defendant while he was confined in .the Broome County jail and in defendant’s absence by means of photographs submitted for her inspection at a police substation. This testimony of prior identification was improperly received *(People*v. *Trowbridge,*305 N. Y. 471; *People*v. *Cioffi,*1 N Y 2d 70). Its erroneous reception, even if adequately objected to, does not, in our judgment, necessitate a new trial. Mrs. Judson unerringly and positively identified defendant as her assailant in the process of viewing a group of prisoners at the jail and without equivocation reidentified him at the trial. The evidence erroneously admitted added little if any weight to evidence, amply sufficient to establish defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. The errors therefore are disregarded. *(People*v. *Vanderborg,*301 N. Y. 750; Code Crim. Pro., § 542.) We have examined appellant’s other contentions and find them to be unsustainable. Judgment affirmed. Gibson, P. J., Reynolds, Taylor, Aulisi and Hamm, JJ., concur.
## Subpart C—Employee Performance
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

Office of Inspector General

The Inspector General

MEMORANDUM

TO: Assistant Inspector General for Audit

Assistant Inspector General for Investigation

Assistant Inspector General for Information Technology

 Audits and Computer Crime Investigations

Assistant Inspector General for Evaluation, Inspection, and

 Management Services

FROM: Inspector General

SUBJECT: Delegation of Authority to Enter Into Contracts and Other Agreements for 

Audits

I. DELEGATION

Under the authority vested in me by Section 3(a) of the Inspector General Act of 

1978, as amended (the Act), 5 U.S.C. Appendix 3, I hereby delegate to you, your 

successor in function, and anyone serving for you in an acting capacity, the 

authority under Section 6(a)(9) of the Act to enter into contracts and other 

arrangements for audits, studies, analyses, and other services as necessary to carry 

out the Office of Inspector General’s responsibilities relating to Department of 

Education’s programs and operations.

II. RESERVATION

The authority for obligation of OIG funds for such agreements is reserved to the 

Assistant Inspector General for Evaluation, Inspection, and Management Services.

III. REDELEGATION

This authority may not be redelegated.
IV. CERTIFICATE AND EFFECTIVE DATE

This delegation is effective upon certification by the Department’s Principal 

Delegations Control Officer and supersedes all previous delegations of this 

authority.

___________/s/_______________ 

 John P. Higgins, Jr.

OGC Clearance and Date: /s/ David Berthiaume, 8/3/2004

Certified Date: 8/3/2004

Departmental Delegations Control Officer: /s/ Naty G. Beetle

Control No.: EF/EFA/159
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE 1ST
QUARTER 10-Q FILING AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                       7,124,183
<SECURITIES>                                 1,073,403
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,827,267
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  9,654,292
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            21,852,091
<PP&E>                                      11,923,814
<DEPRECIATION>                               8,538,999
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              25,280,826
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,573,126
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       504,979
<OTHER-SE>                                  23,707,700
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                25,280,826
<SALES>                                      4,586,892
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,586,892
<CGS>                                        3,888,874
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,888,874
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               447,335
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                375,719
<INCOME-TAX>                                   147,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            228,719
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   228,719
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### § 247.1 Purpose.

This part implements DoD Directive 5122.10[1] and implements policy, assigns responsibilities, and prescribes procedures concerning authorized DoD Appropriated Funded (APF) newspapers and magazines, and Civilian Enterprise (CE) newspapers, magazines, guides, and installation maps in support of the DoD Internal Information Program.

###### Footnotes -
  247.1

[1] Copies may be obtained, at cost, from the National Technical Information Service, 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, VA 22121.
### Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA

- Directorate Identifier:

- AD

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If

they do not, click (or Tab) into and then ou t of the changed cell

.

Estimated Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection,

replacement)

Do not include on

condition costs here Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine,

propeller, appliance)

Work

- hours

(include

access, testing,

and close

- up) Labor

cost

(@$8 5 / h

our) Parts Cost Total Costs

(labor +

parts) Number of

U.S.

Registered

Products Total Cost

for U.S. Fleet



### Inspection 8

. 

### 0 $ 680.00 $0 $ 680.00 

### 89 $ 60,520.00

0 $ 0.00 $ 0.0 0 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0 .00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00



### The known number of products in compliance:

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $ 60,520



### Costs covered under warranty ( if known ) $

On

- Condition Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection,

replacement) Work

- hours

(include access,

testing, and close

up) Labor cost

(@$85/hour) Parts Cost Cost per Product

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00



### Special considerations for Economic Analysis ( Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs) 

### :

### Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES * NO

* Explanation:

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES * NO

* Explanation:

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? E xplain for

either a Yes or No answer.

YES NO

Explanation:

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirement s for

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES * NO



### * Explanation 

### :
**Exhibit 13.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe Annual Report of Sasol Limited (the “Company”) on Form 20-F forthe period ending 30 June 2005, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned hereby certifythat to the best of our knowledge:

1.      TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.      Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:26 October 2005
|                             | By:    | /s/ LAWRENCE  PATRICK ADRIAN DAVIES |                                                 |
|-----------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------|
|                        |   |                                | Lawrence Patrick Adrian Davies                       |
|                        |   |                                | Chief  executive                                     |
| Date: 26  October 2005 |   |                                |
|                        | By:    | /s/ TREVOR  STEWART MUNDAY          |                                                 |
|                        |   |                                | Trevor Stewart Munday                                |
|                        |   |                                | Deputy  chief executive and chief financial  officer |
|                             |        |                                     |                                                      |  |  |

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to and will be retained by Sasol Limitedand furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

This certification will not be deemed “filed” forpurposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, orotherwise subject to the liability of that section. This certification will notbe deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the SecuritiesAct of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, even if the document withwhich it is submitted to the Securities and Exchange Commission is soincorporated by reference.

----
§ 989.5 Organizational relationships. ( a ) The host EPF manages the EIAP using an interdisciplinary team approach. This is especially important for tenant-proposed actions, because the host command is responsible for the EIAP for actions related to the host command's installations.
( b ) The host command prepares environmental documents internally or directs the host base to prepare the environmental documents. Environmental document preparation may be by contract (requiring the tenant to fund the EIAP), by the tenant unit, or by the host. Regardless of the preparation method, the host command will ensure the required environmental analysis is accomplished before a decision is made on the proposal and an action is undertaken. Support agreements should provide specific procedures to ensure host oversight of tenant compliance, tenant funding or reimbursement of host EIAP costs, and tenant compliance with the EIAP regardless of the tenant not being an Air Force organization.
( c ) For aircraft beddown and unit realignment actions, program elements are identified in the Program Objective Memorandum. Subsequent Program Change Requests must include AF Form 813.
( d ) To ensure timely initiation of the EIAP, SAF/AQ forwards information copies of all Mission Need Statements and System Operational Requirements Documents to SAF/IEI, HQ USAF/A7CI (or NGB/A7CV), the Air Force Medical Operations Agency, Aerospace Medicine Office (AFMOA/SG), and the affected MAJCOM EPFs.
( e ) The MAJCOM of the scheduling unit managing affected airspace is responsible for preparing and approving environmental analyses.
[64 FR 38129, July 15, 1999, as amended at 66 FR 16868, Mar. 28, 2001; 72 FR 37106, July 9, 2007; 79 FR 35286, June 20, 2014]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                              11
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     1236
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0<F1>
<INVENTORY>                                         28
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  1281
<PP&E>                                            1531
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0<F1>
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    2907
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              540
<BONDS>                                            975
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        350
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                         713
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      2907
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   118
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       62
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  26
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     42
<INCOME-TAX>                                        16
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 26
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        26
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Not separately identified in the Consolidated Financial Statements or
accompanying notes thereto.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
§ 720.31 Production of official records in the absence of court order. ( a ) *General.* Release of official records outside the Department of the Navy in the absence of a court order is governed by the Privacy Act (5 U.S.C. 552a) and the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552). The following sources pertain: SECNAVINST 5211.5 series (Privacy) and SECNAVINST 5720.42 series (Freedom of Information).
( b ) *Release of JAG Manual Investigations, Court-Martial Records, Articles 69 and 73 Petitions, and Article 138 Complaints of Wrongs.* Except as provided in this section, only the Assistant Judge Advocates General (Civil Law) and (Military Law) shall make determinations concerning the release of the records covered herein if less than a release of the complete requested record will result. In all other instances the Deputy Assistant Judge Advocates General, who have cognizance of the record(s) in issue, may release such records. Local record holders are reminded that the authority to release records does not necessarily include denial authority. ( 1 ) *JAG Manual Investigations (including enclosures).* Any request for release outside the Department of the Navy shall be forwarded to the Assistant Judge Advocate General (Military Law) for determination, except that Privacy Act requests for release shall be forwarded to the Assistant Judge Advocate General (Civil Law) for determination.
( 2 ) *Court-martial records and Articles 69 and 73 petitions.* These are matters of public record and may be released by any local holder. Court-martial records should be released only following proper authentication.
( 3 ) *Article 138 Complaints of Wrongs.* Forward as in paragraph (b)(1) of this section.
( c ) *Affirmative claims files.* Affirmative claims files (including Medical Care Recovery Act files), except to the extent that such files contain copies of reports of investigations prepared under the Manual of the Judge Advocate General, or classified or privileged information, may be released by local holders to insurance companies to support claims; to civilian attorneys representing the injured party's and the Government's interests; and to other components of the Department of Defense, without the prior approval of the Judge Advocate General, provided that the amount of the claim is within the monetary settlement authority of the releaser. When the request for production involves material related to claims in favor of the Government, notification should be made to the affirmative claims office at the naval legal service office having territorial responsibility for the area.
( d ) *Accounting for disclosures of records from systems of records.* When records located in a “system of records” are released, the official responsible for releasing the records shall consult SECNAVINST 5211.5 series regarding the requirement that accountings of the disclosures be maintained. Appendix A-3-a of the Manual of the Judge Advocate General is recommended for this purpose.
(1 CFR 18.14, and part 21, subpart B)
[45 FR 8599, Feb. 8, 1980, as amended at 48 FR 4466, Feb. 1, 1983]
E384 Maintenance Manual
Table of Contents....

H-King ESC

Tiger T-Motor 3515-9

Turnigy 5009 Metal Gear Servo

Skywalker 2014 AirFrame

Turnigy 5000mAh Batteries

3DR Power Module
H-King ESC

After each flight check the heat of the ESC. If it is too hot to touch wait until it has cooled down to begin 

your following flight.

The ESC should be replaced every 200 hours of use.
Tiger T-Motor 3515-9

The motor should be monitored before each flight to monitor the fluidity of the motor. If any binding is 

seen replace the motor.

The motor should be replaced every 200 hours of use.
Turnigy 5009 Metal Gear Servo

The servos should be tested before each flight to make sure they are still operational.

Replace the servos every 100 hours of use.
Skywalker 2014 AirFrame

After each flight observe the wear on the frame. Use CA glue on any small cracks or tares. If there are 

large tares replace the frame.

Replace the frame every 300 hours of use.
Turnigy 5000mAh Batteries

After each flight monitor the physical condition of the batteries. If a battery begins to expand, replace the 

battery.

Batteries should be replaced every 200 cycles.
3DR Power Module

No regular observations needed. 

Replace the 3DR Power Module every 2000 hours.