alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CIBO Startup Survey Summary

6/30/2014

Boiler Type Startup Fuel Primary Fuel Control

Responses 

Received (# 

units)

Avg hours to come 

online after first 

startup fuel ignition

Avg time to reach 

25% load after 

coming online

Avg time to reach 

stable operation 

after 25% load is 

reached

Total time 

to reach 

stable 

operation

Avg hours to come 

online after first 

startup fuel 

ignition

Avg time to 

reach 25% load 

after coming 

online

Avg time to 

reach stable 

operation after 

25% load is 

reached

Total time 

to reach 

stable 

operation

Avg hours to come 

online after first 

startup fuel 

ignition

Avg time to reach 

25% load after 

coming online

Avg time to 

reach stable 

operation after 

25% load is 

reached

Total time 

to reach 

stable 

operation

Circulating FBC Natural gas

Coal or 

coal/biomass Baghouse 20 4.5-31 0.1-4 1-26 6.5-45 4.4-18 0.1-4 2.1-24 6.6-34 0.6-4 0.4-4 1-13 2.5-20

Bubbling FBC Natural gas Coal Baghouse 3 6 1 1 8 4 1 1 6 2-4 1 1 4-6

Baghouse 2 1-6.5 0.1-4 1.4-4 8-9 no response no response no response

no 

response no response no response no response

no 

response

ESP 11 5.5-36 0-3 0-5 7-40 5.5-16 0.1-1 0-9 7-18 3.5-9 0.1-1 0-4.7 5.5-11

Coal Baghouse 7 1-8 0.025-5 0.5-8 2.2-15 1-6 0.039-6 0.5-6 2.4-17 0.5-5 0.017-5 0.5-4 2.8-15

Biomass Baghouse 1 24 1 1 26 24 1 1 26 8 1 1 10

Coal ESP 6 4.5-10 0-1 0-3 5.5-14 5-8 1 1 7-12 4-7 1 1 6-11

Biomass ESP 15 4-24 0.5-8 0.5-20 6-32 4-24 0.5-8 0.5-20 6-32 2-8 0.5-4 0.5-10 4-16

Biomass Scrubber 5 4.5-6.5 0.5-1 0.5-2 7-8 4.5-6.5 0.5-1 0.5-2 7-8 4.5-6.5 0.5-1 0.5-2 6.5-7.5

Fuel Cell

Kerosene / 

Diesel and 

dry wood Biomass ESP 2 3-20 2-4 2-26 22-36 3-20 2-4 2-26 22-36 1-8 1-4 1-10 6-16

Liquid gas Liquid Any 4 5.5-8 1-2 1-2 7.5-11 5.5-8 1-2 1-2 7.5-11 4.5-7 0.5-2 1-2 6.5-11

Pulverized Coal Gas or #2 oil Coal

Stoker or Hybrid 

Suspension Grate

oil, oil soaked 

rags, other 

solid fuel

Cold Startup Data Warm Start Data Hot Start Data

Offline for ≥120 hours prior to initial 

lightoff Offline for 25-119 hours prior to initial lightoff Offline for ≤24 hours prior to initial lightoff

EPA Proposed Time Periods for EGUs

Cold Startup Warm Start Hot Start
Fourth Department,

May, 1964

(May 14, 1964)

#### In the Matter of the Estate of Mary Polubatko, Deceased. Wolf, Popper, Ross, Wolf & Jones et al., Respondents; Arthur Levitt, as Comptroller of the State of New York, Appellant.

Decree unanimously reversed on the law and facts and matter remitted to the Surrogate’s Court for further proceedings in accordance with the memorandum, without costs of this appeal to any party. Memorandum: At the hearing before the Surrogate in November, 1961 the Assistant Attorney-General objected to the payment of the fund on deposit with appellant and in substance raised the issue that the distributees residing in Latvia “would not have the benefit or use or control of the money” (Surrogate’s Ct. Act, § 269-a) if it should be paid to them. The Surrogate without ruling on the objection or passing on the issue summarily directed payment to respondents, as attorneys in fact for the Latvia distributees. While the affidavit of one of these distributees contains the bald statement that they will have full control of the funds this is partially negated by a further statement from which it might be inferred that their foreign attorneys (Law Firm Iniureolleguia) would exercise some domination and control over the moneys. In any event there should have been a trial of the issue and a determination made as provided in section 269-a of Surrogate’s Court Act. Upon such hearing a further decision should be made as to the validity of the powers of attorney. Appellant alleges certain defects appearing on the face of the instruments. These claims should be passed upon by the Surrogate. (Personal Property Law, § 32-a.) Lastly, the validity of the powers of attorney should be determined in the light of *Matter of Luberg*(19 A D 2d 370) and other applicable decisions. (Appeal by Comptroller from decree of Monroe Surrogate’s Court directing him to pay certain distributive shares to people residing in Latvia.) Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Goldman, Henry and Noonan, JJ.
#### MURRAY v. WISTERIA BUILDER

No. 317P97

Case below: 126 N.CApp. 437

Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 2 October 1997.
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NOS. 

WR-88,182-02

WR-88,182-03

EX PARTE COREY WEATHERALL, Applicant

ON APPLICATIONS FOR WRITS OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NOS. W10-52899-U (A) AND W10-71444-U (A)

IN THE 291ST DISTRICT COURT FROM DALLAS COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court these applications for writs of habeas corpus. Ex

parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of two offenses

of drug possession, and he was sentenced to eight years in prison in each case.

In several claims, Applicant alleges that trial counsel told him these two eight-yearsentences

would run concurrently with a federal sentence, so he agreed to plead guilty. He states that the

sentences are not running concurrently, however, so his guilty pleas were not voluntary. See Ex parte

Huerta, 692 S.W.2d 681 (Tex. Crim. App. 1985). The trial court entered an order designating issues,
-2-

but there are no findings resolving the factual issues. Additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex

parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate

forum for findings of fact. 

The trial court shall order trial counsel to respond to Applicant’s claims. To obtain the

response, the trial court may use any means set out in TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d). If

the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant

is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to

represent Applicant at the hearing. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 26.04. 

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law regarding Applicant’s

habeas claims. The trial court may also make any other findings of fact and conclusions of law it

deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant’s claim for habeas corpus relief.

This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The

issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all

affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or

deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall

be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall be

obtained from this Court.

Filed: September 26, 2018

Do not publish
#### M. Lapidus et al., trading as M. Lapidus & Sons, appellees, v. Western Warehousing Company, appellant.

Gen. No. 29,373.

Action to recover value of potatoes stored in defendant’s warehouse and frozen. Judgment for plaintiffs. Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Jacob H. Hopkins, Judge, presiding. Heard in the third division of this court for the first district at the March term, 1924.

Reversed and remanded.

Opinion filed April 29, 1925.

Rehearing denied May 13, 1925.

Loeseh, Scofield, Loeseh & Richards, for appellant.

Joseph M. Connery and Sinden & Hassell, for appellees.

Mr. Presiding Justice O ’Connor

delivered the opinion of the court.
### §427b. Repealed. Aug. 11, 1955, ch. 790, §2, 69 Stat. 674

Section, act June 29, 1935, ch. 338, title I, §3, 49 Stat. 437, authorized appropriations. See section 361b of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Existing Rights and Liabilities

Any rights or liabilities existing under this section unaffected by repeal, see section 2 of act Aug. 11, 1955, set out as a note under former section 361 of this title.
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 12

- 0033 7

- CV

Liberty Bank, F.S.B.

v.

Andrew B. Etter d/b/a Andrew B.

Etter Law Offices §

§

§

§ From County Court at Law No. 3

o f Tarrant County (2008

- 064375

- 3 )

September 19, 2013

Opinion by Justice Walker



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of

the trial court is affirmed.

It is further ordered that appellant Liberty Bank, F.S.B. shall pay all of the

costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By

_________________________________ Justice Sue Walker
##### 



Exhibit 10.3
 EMS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
 OFFICERS DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN
(As Amended And Restated May 19, 2006,
Effective as of January 1, 2005)
       Account
 Beneficiary
 Compensation
 Disability




---



##### 



Election Form
 Employer
 Officer
 Participant
 Plan Administrator
 Plan Year
 Section 409A
 Unforeseeable Emergency
   Eligibility to Participate
 Deferral Election
 Time and Manner of Election
 2




---



##### 



Accounting for Participants Interests
 Deferrals
 Account Interest
 Vesting of a Participants Account
 3




---



##### 



Distribution of a Participants Account
 Date Specified in Participants Election
 Retirement or Other Termination of Employment
  Death of Participant
 4




---



##### 



Change in Control
 Early Distributions
   Action
 5




---



##### 



Right and Duties
 i.
    
    To construe, interpret,
and administer the Plan;ii.
    
    To make allocations and
determinations required by the Plan, and to maintain
records regarding Participants Accounts;iii.
    
    To compute and certify
to the Employer the amount and kinds of benefits payable to
Participants or their Beneficiary(ies), and to determine
the time and manner in which such benefits are to be paid;iv.
    
    To authorize all
disbursements by the Employer pursuant to the Plan;v.
    
    To maintain (or cause
to be maintained) all the necessary records of the
administration of the Plan;vi.
    
    To make and publish
such rules for the regulation of the Plan as are not
inconsistent with the terms hereof;vii.
    
    To delegate to other
individuals or entities from time to time the performance
of any duties or responsibilities hereunder; andviii.
    
    To hire agents,
accountants, actuaries, consultants and legal counsel to
assist in operating and administering the Plan.
  Compensation, Indemnity and Liability
 Taxes
 6




---



##### 



Claims for Benefits
 Appeals
   Amendments
 Termination of Plan
 7




---



##### 



Limitation on Participants Rights
 Benefits Unfunded
  Other Plans
 8




---



##### 



Receipt or Release
 Governing Law
 Employers
 Gender, Tense, and Headings
 Nonalienation of Benefits
 Conformance with Section 409A
 9
Editorial Note on Part 842
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 842 appear at 81 FR 83688, Nov. 22, 2016.

§ 842.22 Who are proper claimants. Proper claimants are: ( a ) Active duty Air Force military personnel.
( b ) Civilian employees of the Air Force who are paid from appropriated funds.
( c ) DOD school teachers and school administrative personnel who are provided logistic and administrative support by an Air Force installation commander.
( d ) Air Force Reserve (AFRES) and Air National Guard (ANG) personnel when performing active duty, full-time National Guard duty, or inactive duty training, ANG technicians under 32 U.S.C. 709.
( e ) Retired or separated Air Force military personnel who suffer damage or loss resulting from the last storage or movement of personal property, or for claims accruing before retirement or separation.
( f ) AFROTC cadets while on active duty for summer training.
( g ) United States Air Force Academy cadets.
[55 FR 2809, Jan. 29, 1990. Redesignated at 81 FR 83688, Nov. 22, 2016]
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

___________________________

No. 02

- 19

- 00175

- CV

___________________________

Original Proceeding

Trial Court No. 17

- 3810

- 431

Before Birdwell, J.; Sudderth, C.J.; and Ga briel

, J.

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion 

### I N RE 

### R.G. , Relator2 MEMORANDUM OPINION

The court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and is of the

opinion that relief should be denied. Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of

mandamus is denied.

Per Curiam

Delivered : August 19, 2019
§ 811.2 Release of visual information materials. ( a ) Only the Secretary of the Air Force for Public Affairs (SAF/PA) clears and releases Air Force materials for use outside Department of Defense (DoD), according to AFI 35-205, Air Force Security and Policy Review Program.
( b ) The Secretary of the Air Force for Legislative Liaison (SAF/LL) arranges the release of VI material through SAF/PA when a member of Congress asks for them for official use.
( c ) The International Affairs Division (HQ USAF/CVAII) or, in some cases, the major command (MAJCOM) Foreign Disclosure Office, must authorize release of classified and unclassified materials to foreign governments and international organizations or their representatives.
#### § 631.13 Applicability.

This subpart is not applicable to the U.S. Coast Guard.
§ 286.5 Description of records sought. ( a ) Requesters must reasonably describe the records sought and provide sufficient detail to enable personnel to locate those records with a reasonable amount of effort. To the extent possible, requesters should include specific information that may assist personnel in identifying the requested records, such as the date, title or name, author, recipient, subject matter of the record, case number, file designation, or reference number. Before submitting their requests, requesters may contact the DoD Component's FOIA RSC or FOIA Public Liaison to discuss the records they are seeking and to receive assistance in describing the records. If after receiving a request the DoD Component determines that it does not reasonably describe the records sought, the DoD Component shall inform the requester what additional information is needed or why the request is otherwise insufficient. Requesters who are attempting to reformulate or modify such a request may discuss their request with the DoD Component's FOIA contact or FOIA Public Liaison. Requesters are encouraged to make every effort to reasonably describe the requested records in order to avoid any delays in the processing of their requests.
( b ) Requesters may specify the preferred form or format (including electronic formats) for the requested records. DoD Components will accommodate the request if the record is readily reproducible in that form or format.
( c ) Requesters must provide contact information, such as a telephone number, email address, and/or mailing address, to assist the DoD Component in communicating and providing released records.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection
with the Quarterly Report of Escalade, Incorporated (the Company) on Form
10-Q for the period ending October 4, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Terry D. Frandsen,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,
as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15 (d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

|                        
|------------------------
|/s/ Terry D.
 Frandsen  
|                        
|Terry D.
 Frandsen      
|Chief
 Financial Officer
|October 23,
 2008       

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
Provident Bancorp, Inc.'s 10-K for December 31, 1995 and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                         213,594
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    959,904
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                      4,896,076
<ALLOWANCE>                                     60,235
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,205,351
<DEPOSITS>                                   4,178,551
<SHORT-TERM>                                   637,240
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            136,940
<LONG-TERM>                                    820,083
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      7,000
<COMMON>                                        11,703
<OTHER-SE>                                     413,834
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               6,205,351
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                411,336
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               50,015
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 1,045
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               462,396
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             192,397
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             259,747
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          202,649
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   14,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                (86)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                138,432
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                107,166
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      71,860
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    71,860
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     4.30
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     3.89
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.86
<LOANS-NON>                                     37,497
<LOANS-PAST>                                    26,578
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                 4,753
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                 27,904
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                51,979
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   14,196
<RECOVERIES>                                     8,452
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               60,235
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            60,235
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 842
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 842 appear at 81 FR 83688, Nov. 22, 2016.

§ 842.38 Who are not proper claimants. ( a ) Governments of foreign nations, their agencies, political subdivisions, or municipalities.
( b ) Agencies and nonappropriated fund instrumentalities (NAFIs) of the U.S. Government.
( c ) Subrogees of § 842.42(a) and (b).
( d ) Inhabitants of foreign countries.
[81 FR 83690, Nov. 22, 2016]
#### § 37.405 What must my announcement or solicitation include?

Your announcement, to be considered as part of a competitive procedure, must include the basic information described in 32 CFR 22.315(a). Additional elements for you to consider in the case of a program that may use TIAs are described in §§ 37.410 through 37.420.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                           UT
<LEGEND>
All amounts in thousands of dollars.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000032379
<NAME>                        Elizabethtown Water Company & Subsidiary

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-Mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-2000
<BOOK-VALUE>                                   PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      656,427
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                      7,456
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                          49,007
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                        34,698
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 747,588
<COMMON>                                        15,741
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      146,081
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                             63,298
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 225,120
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           12,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           231,989
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                              57,000
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                       12,634
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                      715
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 208,130
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  747,588
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                       35,379
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                             2,841
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      22,352
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      25,193
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                         10,186
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                 288
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                  10,474
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         4,820
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,654
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        203
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                    5,451
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                         8,974
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                        3,858
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                           9,886
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0



</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OFCHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

18 U.S.C. Certificationof Richard A. Mansfield

Vice President, ChiefFinancial Officer of

Duckwall-ALCOStores, Inc.

I, Michael S.Marcus, Vice President, Chief Financial Officer of Duckwall-ALCO Stores, Inc.,hereby certify, in  accordance with 18U.S.C. ss 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

(a)          The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qfor the quarter ended April 30, 2006, which accompanies thiscertification, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(b)         The information containedthe Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended May 1,2005, which accompanies this certification, fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operation of Duckwall-ALCOStores, Inc.

A signed originalof this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided toDuckwall-ALCO Stores, Inc. and will be retained by Duckwall-ALCO Stores, Inc.and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

Dated:  June 13, 2006
|        | By:                                     | */s/ Michael S, Marcus* |
|--------|-----------------------------------------|-------------------------|
|   | Michael S. Marcus                       |
|   | Vice President, Chief Financial Officer |

 

----