This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in the rule making prior to the adoption of the final

rules. 

# Proposed Rules Federal Register 

### 12352

Vol. 80, No. 45

Monday, March 9, 2015

**DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY**

**10 CFR Part 951**

**[Docket Number DOE–HQ–2014–0021]**

**RIN 1990–AA39**

**Convention on Supplementary Compensation for Nuclear Damage**  **Contingent Cost Allocation**

**AGENCY :**  Office of the General Counsel, Department of Energy.

**ACTION :**  Extension of public comment period.

**SUMMARY :**  The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) has published a notice of proposed rulemaking (NOPR), which proposes regulations under section 934 of the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (EISA). The proposed regulations would establish a retrospective risk pooling program whereby nuclear suppliers would pay for any contribution made by the United States government to an international supplementary fund created under the Convention for Supplementary Compensation for Nuclear Damage (CSC) in the event of certain nuclearincidents not covered by the PriceAnderson Act. The NOPR provided a deadline of March 17, 2015 for comments. In response to requests for an extension, this document announces an extension of the comment period to April 17, 2015. This document also requests comment by April 17, 2015 on specific questions to inform a process
for DOE to obtain additional data and
information.

**DATES :**  DOE will accept comments and information regarding the NOPR and development of regulations under section 934 published on December 17, 2014 (79 FR 75076), and the specific questions identified in this document no later than April 17, 2015. DOE will consider any comments received by midnight of April 17, 2015, and deems any comments received by that time to be timely submitted.

**ADDRESSES :**  Interested persons may submit comments identified by RIN 1990–AA39 by any of the following
methods:

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.

• Email: Section934Rulemaking@ Hq.Doe.gov. Include Section 934 in the subject line of the message.

• Mail: Ms. Sophia Angelini, U.S. Department of Energy, Office of General Counsel, Mailstop GC–72, 1000 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20585. Please submit one signed original and three copies of
all comments.

• Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name, docket number [DOE–HQ–2014–0021], and the RIN for this rulemaking. Note
that all comments received will be posted, without change, including personal information.

• Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or comments received, go to the Federal eRulemaking Portal at http:// www.regulations.gov, or the Web site specifically established for this proceeding at http://www.energy.gov/gc/convention-supplementarycompensation-rulemaking

. **FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Sophia Angelini, Attorney-Advisor,
Office of the General Counsel for Civilian Nuclear Programs, GC–72, U.S. Department of Energy, 1000 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20585; telephone: (202)

586–0319.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  On December 17, 2014, DOE published a
NOPR in the Federal Register (79 FR 75076) in which it proposed regulations
under section 934 of EISA to establish a retrospective risk pooling program whereby, in the event of certain nuclear incidents, nuclear suppliers would pay for any contribution by the United States government to the international supplementary fund created by the CSC. The NOPR provided that written public comments were to be received by DOE no later than March 17, 2015. By letter dated January 28, 2015, DOE received a request from the Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) for an extension of the public comment period to May 19, 2015, stating that the complexity of the NOPR requires extensive analysis on a number of issues such as the proposed reporting requirements, the potential impact of
the two alternative methods of calculating the risk premium payment to a particular nuclear supplier and the nuclear industry as a whole, and clarification of key terms in the proposed rule.

On February 20, 2015, DOE held a public workshop on the proposed rulemaking (80 FR 4227). In advance of the public workshop, DOE solicited from the public questions or suggestions for topics to be addressed at the workshop in order to structure the discussion and enhance participation (80 FR 4228). DOE received extensive questions and topic suggestions from the Contractors International Group on Nuclear Liability (CIGNL) and NEI. The day-long workshop was attended by representatives of various nuclear industry organizations and other entities. The participants at the workshop raised a number of questions and expressed concerns regarding, among other things, the level of
information and data available to DOE on the cost and burden of reporting requirements under the proposed rule, the nature and quantity of nuclear exports and the nuclear suppliers that export, and the allocation of risk and premium payments across and among nuclear suppliers. Thereafter, DOE received written requests from other participants at the public workshop echoing the NEI request for an extension of time for public comment given the complexity of the issues raised in the proposed rule and further described at the public meeting. All these entities requested an extension of the comment period to May 19, 2015, to allow sufficient time to review the proposed
rule and formulate comments to the extent possible given available
information.

DOE has considered the written extension requests noted above, along
with the comments and information provided prior to and at the public meeting, and determined that the comment period on the NOPR should be extended to April 17, 2015, which provides, in total, a 120 day comment period.

DOE is especially interested in potential modifications to the proposals set forth in the NOPR, in light of the issues discussed at the workshop. These issues include: (1) The extent, if any, to which transactions prior to the effective
date of the rule should be considered in the allocation formula; (2) the


### 12353 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 45 / Monday, March 9, 2015 / Proposed Rules

justification for capping the allocation assigned to a single entity; (3) the possibility of different caps for different types of suppliers; (4) the criteria for classifying a supplier as a small entity exempt from the allocation formula; (5) goods and services that pose no or de minimis risk of triggering the international supplementary fund; (6) alternative methodologies for evaluating risk, including examples of existing risk
allocation mechanisms in the nuclear industry; and (7) potential modification to simplify, minimize and/or clarify the burden on industry.

In addition, DOE intends to conduct
additional data and information gathering in response to and in
consideration of statements in the written comments and at the public workshop. These statements suggest
certain additional information should be obtained by DOE and is necessary for the public to comment on the NOPR. In response to these statements, DOE is requesting any entity that believes
additional information is needed to provide detailed comments as to the specific information it believes is
needed.

DOE is enumerating several general questions to assist DOE in its additional data gathering effort. The general questions for which DOE seeks comment are: (1) What data and information should be gathered on U.S. nuclear suppliers and their exports (for example, what entity should be considered the exporter (especially in situations where a supplier employs an entity to facilitate the export), should quantity, value and/or another factor be used to measure exports, and what time period should be used); (2) what data and information should be gathered on nuclear suppliers to inform reporting requirements (for example, what are the recordkeeping methods employed in the nuclear industry and what is currently reported to other government agencies); and (3) what data and information should be gathered on the allocation of risk across and among nuclear suppliers and nuclear supplier groups. Comments concerning additional information to be gathered will facilitate DOE’s effort to
obtain additional data and information to inform the proposed rulemaking and should be provided to DOE by April 17,
2015. DOE intends to make the
additional data and information it obtains available for public review and comment, the date and timing of which will be announced in a subsequent Federal Register notice.

DOE will consider any comments received by midnight of April 17, 2015, and deems any comments received by that time to be timely submitted. To the extent commenters provide confidential business information, pursuant to 10 CFR 1004.11, any person submitting
information he or she believes to be confidential and exempt by law from public disclosure should submit via email, postal mail, or hand delivery/ courier two well-marked copies: One copy of the document marked ‘‘confidential’’ including all the information believed to be confidential, and one copy of the document marked
‘‘non-confidential’’ with the information
believed to be confidential deleted.
Submit these documents via email or on a CD, if feasible. DOE will make its own
determination about the confidential
status of the information and treat it according to its determination. Factors of interest to DOE when evaluating requests to treat submitted information as confidential include: (1) A description of the items; (2) whether and why such items are customarily
treated as confidential within the industry; (3) whether the information is generally known by or available from other sources; (4) whether the information has previously been made available to others without obligation concerning its confidentiality; (5) an explanation of the competitive injury to the submitting person which would result from public disclosure; (6) when such information might lose its
confidential character due to the passage of time; and (7) why disclosure of the information would be contrary to the public interest.

Issued in Washington, DC, on March 4,

2015. Samuel T. Walsh, Deputy General Counsel for Energy Policy.

[FR Doc. 2015–05405 Filed 3–6–15; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6450–01–P**

**SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION**

**13 CFR Parts 121, 124, 125, 126 and**

**127**

**[Docket No. SBA–2014–0006]**

**RIN 3245–AG58**

**Small Business Government Contracting and National Defense** 
**Authorization Act of 2013 Amendments**

**AGENCY :**  U.S. Small Business
Administration.

**ACTION :**  Proposed rule; reopening of comment period.

**SUMMARY :**  The U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) is reopening the comment period for the proposed rule published in the Federal Register on December 29, 2014 at 79 FR 77955. In that rule SBA proposed to implement provisions of the National Defense Authorization Act of 2013, which pertain to performance requirements applicable to small business and socioeconomic program set aside
contracts and small business subcontracting. SBA also proposed to make changes to its regulations concerning the nonmanufacturer rule and affiliation rules. Further, SBA proposed to allow a joint venture to qualify as small for any government procurement as long as each partner to the joint venture qualifies individually
as small under the size standard corresponding to the NAICS code assigned in the solicitation. Finally, SBA requested comments on the timeline and procedures for North American Industry Classification System code appeals. The comment period closed on February 27, 2015.

SBA is reopening the comment period in response to the significant level of interest generated by the proposed rule and due to the request of multiple stakeholders. Given the scope of the proposed rule and the nature of the issues raised by the comments received to date, SBA believes that affected
businesses need more time to review the proposal and fully prepare their

comments.

**DATES :**  The comment period for the proposed rule published on December 29, 2014 (79 FR 77955) is extended through April 6, 2015.

**ADDRESSES :**  You may submit comments, identified by Docket Number: SBA– 2014–0006, by any of the following
methods:

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.

• For mail, paper, disk, or CD/ROM submissions: Brenda Fernandez, U.S. Small Business Administration, Office of Policy, Planning and Liaison, 409 Third Street SW., 8th Floor, Washington, DC 20416.

• Hand Delivery/Courier: Brenda Fernandez, U.S. Small Business Administration, Office of Policy, Planning and Liaison, 409 Third Street SW., 8th Floor, Washington, DC 20416.

SBA will post all comments on www.regulations.gov. If you wish to
submit confidential business information (CBI) as defined in the User

Notice at www.regulations.gov, please
submit the information to Brenda Fernandez, U.S. Small Business Administration, Office of Policy, Planning and Liaison, 409 Third Street SW., 8th Floor, Washington, DC 20416,
or send an email to brenda.fernandez@ sba.gov. Highlight the information that