alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 565 

To amend title 31, United States Code, to provide for transparency of 

payments made from the Judgment Fund. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 8, 2017 

Mrs. FISCHER (for herself, Mr. GARDNER, Mr. GRASSLEY, and Mr. CRAPO) 

introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 31, United States Code, to provide for 

transparency of payments made from the Judgment Fund. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Judgment Fund 

5 Transparency Act of 2017’’. 

6 SEC. 2. JUDGMENT FUND TRANSPARENCY. 

7 (a) TRANSPARENCY REQUIREMENT.—Section 1304 

8 of title 31, United States Code, is amended by adding at 

9 the end the following: 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 565 IS

1 ‘‘(d) Unless the disclosure of such information is oth2 erwise prohibited by law or court order, the Secretary of 

3 the Treasury shall make available to the public on a Web 

4 site, as soon as practicable, but not later than 30 days 

5 after the date on which a payment under this section is 

6 tendered, the following information with regard to that 

7 payment: 

8 ‘‘(1) The name of the specific agency or entity 

9 whose actions gave rise to the claim or judgment. 

10 ‘‘(2) The name of the plaintiff or claimant. 

11 ‘‘(3) The name of counsel for the plaintiff or 

12 claimant. 

13 ‘‘(4) The amount paid representing principal li14 ability and any amounts paid representing any ancil15 lary liability, including attorney fees, costs, and in16 terest. 

17 ‘‘(5) A brief description of the facts that gave 

18 rise to the claim. 

19 ‘‘(6) The name of the agency that submitted 

20 the claim.’’. 

21 (b) IMPLEMENTATION.—The Secretary of the Treas22 ury shall implement the amendment made by this section 

23 beginning not later than 60 days after the date of enact24 ment of this Act. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
### §3603. Delegation of powers and duties

The President may exercise any power or duty conferred on him by this chapter through such agencies or offices of the United States as he shall designate. Such agencies or offices shall issue such regulations as they determine are necessary to implement this chapter.

(Pub. L. 96–236, §3, Apr. 22, 1980, 94 Stat. 336.)
Exhibit 23




                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
                               Arthur Andersen LLP



































<PAGE>


                                   Exhibit 23




                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


Hurco Companies, Inc.
Indianapolis, Indiana



As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of our
report dated December 1, 1995,  except with respect to the matters  discussed in
Notes 4 and 12 as to which the date is January 26,  1996,  included in this Form
10-K,  into the  Company's  previously  filed  Registration  Statement  File No.
2-71597.





                                                           ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP




Indianapolis, Indiana
January 26, 1996
#### The People of the State of New York v. Charles E. Trudeau, Also Known as Charles Truedell, Also Known as Charles Devereau, Also Known as Paul Denning, and Leroy Durham.

Motion for a change of venue denied. See decision in *People*v. *Trudeau,*motion for change of venue denied (16 AD 2d 887).
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Esterline Technologies Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q
for the period ended April 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-Q), I, Robert D. George, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)        The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)        The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





|                    |  |  |  |     |  |                                                                
|------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: June 3, 2010 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Robert D. George                                           
|                    |  |  |  |     |  | Robert D. George                                               
|                    |  |  |  |     |  | Vice President, Chief Financial Officer,Secretary and Treasurer
### §6012. Suspension or termination of plan

#### (a) Mandatory suspension or termination

The Secretary shall, whenever the Secretary finds that the plan or any provision of the plan obstructs or does not tend to effectuate the declared policy of this chapter, terminate or suspend the operation of such plan or provision.

#### (b) Suspension or termination

If, as a result of any referendum conducted under this chapter, the Secretary determines that suspension or termination of a plan is favored by a majority of the growers, grower-shellers, and importers voting in the referendum, the Secretary shall—

(1) within 6 months after making such determination, suspend or terminate, as the case may be, collection of assessments under the plan; and

(2) suspend or terminate, as the case may be, activities under the plan in an orderly manner as soon as practicable.

#### (c) Limitation

The termination or suspension of any plan, or any provision thereof, shall not be considered a plan within the meaning of this chapter.

(Pub. L. 101–624, title XIX, §1917, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 3854.)
### §2103. Notice and hearing upon proposed orders

Whenever the Secretary has reason to believe that the issuance of an order will tend to effectuate the declared policy of this chapter, he shall give due notice and opportunity for a hearing upon a proposed order. Such hearing may be requested and a proposal for an order submitted by any cotton producer organization certified pursuant to section 2113 of this title or by any other interested person or persons, including the Secretary.

(Pub. L. 89–502, §4, July 13, 1966, 80 Stat. 280.)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM SEROLOGICALS
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES' CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE FISCAL
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 28,1997, AS SET FORTH IN ITS FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-28-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-29-1997
<CASH>                                          31,812
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,522
<ALLOWANCES>                                       531
<INVENTORY>                                     10,154
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                52,822
<PP&E>                                          13,682
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 123,492
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,267
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           157
<OTHER-SE>                                     103,258
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   123,492
<SALES>                                         97,534
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                97,534
<CGS>                                           62,065
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   62,065
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                16,935
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (532)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 19,066
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,064
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             12,002
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    12,002
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .81
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .76
        

</TABLE>
### **CHAPTER 37—SEEDS**

Sec.
1551.
Short title.

#### SUBCHAPTER I—DEFINITIONS

1561.
Definition of terms.
1562.
False representations as certified seed; required provisions.

#### SUBCHAPTER II—INTERSTATE COMMERCE

1571.
Prohibitions relating to interstate commerce in certain seeds.
1572.
Records.
1573.
Exemptions.
1574.
Disclaimers, limited warranties and nonwarranties.
1575.
False advertising.

#### SUBCHAPTER III—FOREIGN COMMERCE

1581.
Prohibitions relating to importations.
1582.
Procedure relating to importations; disposal of refuse; exceptions.
1583, 1584. Repealed.
1585.
Certain seeds not adapted for general agricultural use.
1586.
Certain acts prohibited.

#### SUBCHAPTER IV—GENERAL PROVISIONS

1591.
Delegation of duties.
1592.
Rules and regulations.
1593.
Standards, tests, tolerances.
1593a.
Seed variety information and survey.
1594.
Prohibition against alterations.
1595.
Seizure.
1596.
Penalties.
1597.
Agent's acts as binding principal.
1598.
Notice of intention to prosecute.
1599.
Cease and desist proceedings.
1600.
Appeal to court of appeals.
1601.
Enforcement of order.
1602.
Separability.
1603.
Procedural powers; witness fees and mileage.
1604.
Publication.
1605.
Authorization of appropriations.
1606.
Authorization of expenditures.
1607.
Cooperation with other governmental agencies.
1608.
Separability.
1609.
Repeals.
1610.
Effective date.

#### SUBCHAPTER V—SALE OF UNCERTIFIED SEED OF PROTECTED VARIETY

1611.
Illegal sales of uncertified seed.
### §2009bb–8. Approval of development plans and projects

#### (a) In general

A State or regional development plan or any multistate subregional plan that is proposed for development under this subchapter shall be reviewed by the Authority.

#### (b) Evaluation by State member

An application for a grant or any other assistance for a project under this subchapter shall be made through and evaluated for approval by the State member of the Authority representing the applicant.

#### (c) Certification

An application for a grant or other assistance for a project shall be approved only on certification by the State member that the application for the project—

(1) describes ways in which the project complies with any applicable State development plan;

(2) meets applicable criteria under section 2009bb–7 of this title;

(3) provides adequate assurance that the proposed project will be properly administered, operated, and maintained; and

(4) otherwise meets the requirements of this subchapter.

#### (d) Votes for decisions

On certification by a State member of the Authority of an application for a grant or other assistance for a specific project under this section, an affirmative vote of the Authority under section 2009bb–1(c) of this title shall be required for approval of the application.

(Pub. L. 87–128, title III, §383J, formerly §383I, as added Pub. L. 107–171, title VI, §6028, May 13, 2002, 116 Stat. 386; renumbered §383J and amended Pub. L. 110–234, title VI, §6026(c)(1)(A), (2)(E), May 22, 2008, 122 Stat. 1178, 1179, and Pub. L. 110–246, §4(a), title VI, §6026(c)(1)(A), (2)(E), June 18, 2008, 122 Stat. 1664, 1940, 1941.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Pub. L. 110–234 and Pub. L. 110–246 made identical amendments to this section. The amendments by Pub. L. 110–234 were repealed by section 4(a) of Pub. L. 110–246.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 383J of Pub. L. 87–128, title III, was renumbered section 383K and is classified to section 2009bb–9 of this title.

#### Amendments

2008—Subsec. (c)(2). Pub. L. 110–246, §6026(c)(2)(E), made technical amendment to reference in original act which appears in text as reference to section 2009bb–7 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2008 Amendment

Amendment of this section and repeal of Pub. L. 110–234 by Pub. L. 110–246 effective May 22, 2008, the date of enactment of Pub. L. 110–234, see section 4 of Pub. L. 110–246, set out as an Effective Date note under section 8701 of this title.
Exhibit 10.1


 


THIRD
AMENDMENT TO AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


 


THIS THIRD AMENDMENT
(this “Amendment”) is made as of this 5th day of April, 2006 to that
certain AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT, dated as of May 15, 2002, as
amended (collectively, the “Employment Agreement”), by and between DAVID E.
ULLMAN (“Employee”) and JOS. A. BANK CLOTHIERS, INC. (“Employer”).


 


FOR GOOD AND VALUABLE
CONSIDERATION, the receipt and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged,
Employer and Employee, being the sole parties to the Employment Agreement,
hereby amend the Employment Agreement as follows:


 


1. Subject to earlier
termination otherwise set forth in the Employment Agreement, the last day of
the Employment Period shall be January 31, 2008.


 


2. Effective February 26,
2006, Employee’s Base Salary shall be $375,000.00.


 


Except as specifically
amended hereby, the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect
according to its terms. To the extent of any conflict between the terms of this
Amendment and the terms of the remainder of the Employment Agreement, the terms
of this Amendment shall control and prevail. Capitalized terms used but not
defined herein shall have those respective meanings attributed to them in the
Employment Agreement. This Amendment shall hereafter be deemed a part of the
Employment Agreement for all purposes. The terms of employment set forth in
this Amendment have been approved by the Audit Committee of the Board of
Directors of the Employer.


 


IN WITNESS
WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of the date first
above written.


 


JOS. A. BANK CLOTHIERS,
INC.


 


	
  By:

  	
  /s/
  Robert N. Wildrick

  	
   

  	
  /s/ David E. Ullman

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Robert N. Wildrick,

  	
  DAVID E. ULLMAN

  
	
   

  	
  Chief Executive Officer
Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

Docket Number: FAA- 2012-1161

Directorate Identifier: 2011NM277AD

737-53A1255, R1 ---11/7/11

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED April 18, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-50501 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus NATHAN WELLS, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 5:05-CR-300-ALL

-------------------- Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BENAVIDES, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Counsel appointed to represent Nathan Wells on appeal has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Wells has not responded to counsel’s motion. Our independent review of counsel’s brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities, and the APPEAL
IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Francisco Hernandez, Appellant.

[832 NYS2d 205]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Renee A. White, J.), rendered May 13, 2003, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of assault in the second degree and unlawful imprisonment in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a second violent felony offender, to an aggregate term of six years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s general motion for a trial order of dismissal failed to preserve the legal sufficiency claims he asserts on appeal, and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. Were we to review these claims, we would reject them. The evidence satisfied the elements of second-degree assault under a theory of intent to prevent a police officer from performing a lawful duty (Penal Law § 120.05 [3]). The officer was performing the lawful duty of investigating a possible crime in progress, or at least a public disturbance, and of restraining defendant, who was behaving in a threatening and belligerent manner *(see Matter of Ismaila M.,*34 AD3d 373 [2006]). The evidence also supported the inference that defendant knew his victim was a police officer, and acted with the requisite intent.

Defendant’s arguments concerning his unlawful imprisonment conviction, and his challenges to the court’s charge, including his pro se claims, are likewise unpreserved and unavailing. Concur—Saxe, J.P, Williams, Buckley, Catterson and Malone, JJ.
Second Department,

February, 1960 *

(February 23, 1960)

#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Leonard Wolochen, Appellant.

Motion [No. 64] for reconsideration of motion for leave to appeal as a poor person from an order denying, without a hearing, an application in the nature of *comm nobis*and for assignment of counsel. Motion denied. In our opinion, after an examination of the affidavits submitted on this motion and of the original papers submitted on the application, no merit to the appeal has been shown. (See *People*v. *Wolochen,*Motion No. 152, decided herewith.) Present — Nolan, P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Pette and Brennan, JJ.
MEMORANDUM

TO: Addressees

 

FROM: The Secretary

SUBJECT: Delegation of Authority

I. DELEGATION

Under the authority vested in me by section 412 of the Department of Education 

Organization Act, 20 U.S.C. §3472, I hereby delegated to you, and to anyone 

serving for you in an acting capacity, for your respective Principal Office, the 

authority under 5 U.S.C. Section 3595(b)(3)(B), to file written objections to the 

Office of Personnel Management, when appropriate, based on your determination 

that the career Senior Executive Service employees referred failed to meet the 

technical qualifications for applicable position vacancies.

Unless otherwise noted in future delegations of authority, legislative amendments to 

the authorities delegated herein are included in the scope of this delegation.

II. RESERVATIONS

None.

III. REDELEGATION

This authority may not be redelegated.

IV. CERTIFICATION AND EFFECTIVE DATE

This delegation is effective upon certification by the Department’s Principal 

Delegations Control Officer and supersedes all previous delegation of this authority.

___________(Signed)___________ 

Richard W. Riley

OGC Clearance and Date: /s/ R. Wexler, 7/12/96

Certification Date: 7/31/96

Certified by Departmental Delegations Control Officer: /s/ Naty Beetle 

 

Control Number: EA/EE/16 – Under Secretary
Addressees and PO Control No.

EA/EB/137 – Deputy Secretary

EA/EC/185 – Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights

EA/EE/16 – Under Secretary

EA/EF/83 – Inspector General

EA/EG/79 – General Counsel

EA/EH/69 – Assistant Secretary for Special Education and Rehabilitative Services

EA/EJ/28 - Assistant Secretary for Legislation and Congressional Affairs

EA/EK/86 - Assistant Secretary for Intergovernmental and Interagency Affairs

EA/EL/62 – Chief Financial Officer

EA/EP/244 - Assistant Secretary for Postsecondary Education

EA/ES/54- Assistant Secretary for Elementary and Secondary Education

EA/EV/58 - Assistant Secretary for Vocational and Adult Education

EA/EI/2 - Chief Information Officer

EA/EN/2 - Chief Operating Officer, Federal Student Aid

EA/EQ/2 - Deputy Under Secretary for Safe and Drug-Free Schools

EA/ER/1 - Director, Institute of Education Sciences

EA/EU/2 - Deputy Under Secretary for Innovation and Improvement
No. 8065.

#### Reily, Widow, etc., *v.*Whiteman et al.

(Decided October 20, 1903.)

Error to Circuit Court of Hamilton county..

*Messrs. Johnson & Levy,*for plaintiff in error. ..

*Messrs. Coffey, Mallon, Mills & V or deni) erg,*for defendants in error. ""

Judgments of the circuit court and of the common pleas court reversed, and cause remanded on authority of *Yetzer*v. *Thoman,*17 Ohio St., 130, and *McAllister*v. *Hartzell,*60 Ohio St., 69.

Burket, C. J., Spear, Davis, Shauck, Price and Crew, JJ., concur.
RE: Changes to Section IV which we just discussed Lydia Wegman to: Laity, James A. 06/02/2010 03:20 PM

Cc: Bridgid Curry, Charlotte Bertrand, "Mancini, Dominic J.", James Hemby, Kevin McLean, Lewis Weinstock, Michael Stewart, Nealson Watkins, Padmini Singh, Richard Wayland, Sara Schneeberg, Tricia Crabtree

Thanks very much Jim for your quick response and for catching the typos. We'll correct them before folding this part of the preamble into the final rule.

"Laity, James A." 06/02/2010 03:16:55 PM Lydia, As you said, these are all editorial/clarifyin...

From: "Laity, James A." <James

_ A.

_ Laity@omb.eop.gov> To: Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, "Mancini, Dominic J." <Dominic

_ J.

_ Mancini@omb.eop.gov> Cc: James Hemby/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Richard Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Nealson Watkins/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Padmini Singh/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Kevin McLean/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Sara Schneeberg/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Tricia Crabtree/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Michael Stewart/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Lewis Weinstock/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Charlotte Bertrand/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Bridgid Curry/DC/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 06/02/2010 03:16 PM Subject: RE: Changes to Section IV which we just discussed

Lydia, As you said, these are all editorial/clarifying changes and they look fine to us. We note a few grammatical typos in the attached which you may want to correct.

From: Wegman.Lydia@epamail.epa.gov [ mailto:Wegman.Lydia@epamail.epa.gov] Sent: Wednesday, June 02, 2010 2:23 PM To: Laity, James A.; Mancini, Dominic J. Cc: Hemby.James@epamail.epa.gov; Wayland.Richard@epamail.epa.gov; Watkins.Nealson@epamail.epa.gov; Singh.Padmini@epamail .epa.gov; Mclean.Kevin@epamail.epa.gov; schneeberg.sara@epamail.epa.gov; Crabtree.Tricia@epamail.epa.gov; Stewart.Michael@epamail.epa.gov; Weinstock.Lewis@epamail.epa.gov; Bertrand.Charlotte@epamail.epa.gov; Curry.Bridgid@epamail.epa.gov Subject: Changes to Section IV which we just discussed

Jim (and Dom),

Please find attached a redline version of section IV of the SO2 preamble. Our monitoring team has made some clarifying and editorial changes to improve the transparency of the monitoring preamble and reg text. There are no substantive changes. Needless to say, I wanted you to have the redline version so you could see what has been changed. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thanks a lot.

Lydia



### [attachment "Primary SO2 Final Preamble - DRAFT - Monitoring 6-2-10 typos corrected.doc" deleted by Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US]