alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §§3174, 3174a. Repealed. Pub. L. 113–79, title VII, §§7108, 7109, Feb. 7, 2014, 128 Stat. 870

Section 3174, Pub. L. 95–113, title XIV, §1424, as added Pub. L. 104–127, title VIII, §808, Apr. 4, 1996, 110 Stat. 1162; amended Pub. L. 105–185, title III, §301(a)(4), June 23, 1998, 112 Stat. 562; Pub. L. 107–171, title VII, §7104, May 13, 2002, 116 Stat. 432; Pub. L. 110–234, title VII, §§7113, 7114, May 22, 2008, 122 Stat. 1219; Pub. L. 110–246, §4(a), title VII, §§7113, 7114, June 18, 2008, 122 Stat. 1664, 1980, 1981, related to human nutrition intervention and health promotion research program.

Section 3174a, Pub. L. 95–113, title XIV, §1424A, as added Pub. L. 104–127, title VIII, §808, Apr. 4, 1996, 110 Stat. 1163; amended Pub. L. 105–185, title III, §301(a)(5), June 23, 1998, 112 Stat. 562; Pub. L. 107–171, title VII, §7105, May 13, 2002, 116 Stat. 432; Pub. L. 110–234, title VII, §§7115, 7511(c)(10)(A), May 22, 2008, 122 Stat. 1220, 1268; Pub. L. 110–246, §4(a), title VII, §§7115, 7511(c)(10)(A), June 18, 2008, 122 Stat. 1664, 1981, 2029, related to pilot research program to combine medical and agricultural research.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 3174, Pub. L. 95–113, title XIV, §1424, as added Pub. L. 101–624, title XVI, §1610(a), Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 3719, provided for establishment of food science and nutrition research center for Southeast region of United States prior to repeal by Pub. L. 104–127, title VIII, §808, Apr. 4, 1996, 110 Stat. 1162.

Another prior section 3174, Pub. L. 95–113, title XIV, §1424, Sept. 29, 1977, 91 Stat. 1000, provided for a study assessing potential value and cost of establishing regional food and human nutrition research centers and a report thereon, with findings and recommendations, to be submitted to the Congress not later than one year after Oct. 1, 1977, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 99–198, title XIV, §1413, Dec. 23, 1985, 99 Stat. 1549.
1 Filed 10/9/14 P. v. Hipes CA3 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT (Butte)

----

THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent,

v. CHARLES DEAN HIPES, JR., Defendant and Appellant. C075873 (Super. Ct. No. CM039935)

This case comes to us pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 ( Wende ). Having reviewed the r ecord as required by Wende , we affirm the judgment. We provide the following brief description of the facts and procedural history of the case. (See People v. Kelly (2006) 40 Cal.4th 106, 110, 124.)2 BACKGROUND Law officers received a report that two sets of keys and a cell phone were stolen from a park bench. Defendant Charles Dean Hipes, Jr., who officers knew had been
involved in a number of th efts, was nearby. Officers contacted him, conducted a probation search, and recovered the keys and cell phone. In addition, they found three hypodermic syringes in defendant’s pants pockets. A complaint charged defendant with receiv ing stolen property (Pen. Code, § 496, subd. (a)), 1 with an additional allegation that defe ndant had served two prior prison terms (§ 667.5, subd. (b)), and possession of an inje ction/ingestion device (Health & Saf. Code, § 11364.1, subd. (a)(1)). Defendant pleaded no contest to recei ving stolen property, with an agreed maximum sentence of three years. The remaining charges were dismissed. The trial court sentenced defendant to the upper term of three years and ordered defendant to pay a $280 restitution fund fine (§ 1202.4), a $3 0 conviction assessment (Gov. Code, § 70373), and a $40 court operations assessment (§ 1465. 8). The court awarded defendant 141 days of presentence custody credits. The trial cour t denied defendant’s request for a certificate of probable cause.
DISCUSSION We appointed counsel to represent defenda nt on appeal. Counsel filed an opening brief setting forth the facts of the case and, pursuant to Wende, supra , 25 Cal.3d 436, requesting the court to review the record and determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. Defendant was advised by counsel of the right to file a supplemental brief within 30 days of the da te of filing of the opening br ief. We have undertaken an

1 Undesignated statutory references are to the Penal Code.3 examination of the entir e record pursuant to Wende , and we find no arguable error that would result in a disposition more favorable to defendant.
DISPOSITION The judgment is affirmed.

RAYE , P. J.

We concur:

BLEASE , J.

HULL , J.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Charles A. Caruso, Appellant.

Motion granted to prosecute appeal upon single typewritten record and printed briefs; and time for argument of appeal enlarged to include September 1962 Term on condition record and appellant’s briefs are filed on or before July 2, 1962.
§ 90.100 Respirable dust standard. Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 28482 , Apr. 18, 2024.
The following is required until April 14, 2025. After the 20th calendar day following receipt of notification from MSHA that a part 90 miner is employed at the mine, the operator shall continuously maintain the average concentration of respirable dust in the mine atmosphere during each shift to which the part 90 miner in the active workings of the mine is exposed, as measured with an approved sampling device and expressed in terms of an equivalent concentration, at or below: ( a ) 1.0 milligrams of respirable dust per cubic meter of air (mg/m3).
( b ) 0.5 mg/m3 as of August 1, 2016.
[79 FR 24989, May 1, 2014, as amended at 89 FR 28482, Apr. 18, 2024]
### §2254b. Availability of funds appropriated for Agricultural Research Service for research related to tobacco or tobacco products; exception

On and after December 26, 2007, none of the funds appropriated under this heading shall be available to carry out research related to the production, processing, or marketing of tobacco or tobacco products: Provided further, That on and after December 26, 2007, this paragraph shall not apply to research on the medical, biotechnological, food, and industrial uses of tobacco.

(Pub. L. 110–161, div. A, title I, Dec. 26, 2007, 121 Stat. 1851.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This heading, referred to in text, refers to the headings "Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service" and "research and education activities" of title I of div. A of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2008, Pub. L. 110–161.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION 4 ATLANTA FEDERAL CENTER 61 FORSYTH STREET ATLANTA , GEORGIA 30303-8960

Justin Green , Di rector Divi s io n of Air R esource Management Florida Depart m

e nt of E nvironmental Protec ti o n 2600 Blair Stone Road Tallaha ssee, Flori da 32399-2400 Dear 

### Mr

. Gree n: 

# APR 

# 1 9 2016

E ncl osed is th e final e nd-of-year report for yo ur agency's FY 20 1 5 Air P o llu tion Contro l grant autho ri z ed by 

### § 105 of th e C lean Air Act. Thi s report outli nes you r age nc y's various grant commitments and their s tatu s. S in ce there were no issues and no adju s tments neces sary , your report i s now finalized. This letter docum e nt s the conclus ion of the joint eva l uation proce ss required by 40 Code of Federal R eg ulation s 35 .115 and identified as a commitment 

### in your FY 20 15 Ai r Planning Agreement under 

### Cross C ulling I ss ues . We appreciate th e progress you made in FY 2015 and lo ok forward to co ntinuing our joint efforts to protect and improve a ir quality. If you h ave any questions regard in g your grant, p lease contact Stuart P erry at (404 ) 562

- 8980 or Angela I som at (404) 562-9092.

Enclo s ure Caro l L. Kemker Acting Dir ector Air , Pe s ticide s and T ox ics Management Division

Internet Address (URL) • http :// www .epa.gov Recycled/Recyclable • Printed with Veg eta ble 011 Based Inks on Recycled Paper (Min i mum 30 % Postconsumer)
EXHIBIT 32.1
   Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
   1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with this quarterly report of Espey Mfg. & Electronics  Corp. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period ended  September  30, 2008 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "report"),  I,
Howard Pinsley,  President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

      1.    The report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The  information  contained in this report fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

Date: November 13, 2008

                                                        /s/Howard Pinsley
                                                        ------------------------
                                                        Howard Pinsley
                                                        President and
                                                        Chief Executive Officer


                                       16
<PAGE>
                PROVIDENT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

EXHIBIT 32.1

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

                       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

In connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the
Annual Report of Provident Financial Group, Inc. (Provident) on Form 10-K for
the period ending December 31, 2004 (the Report), I, Robert L. Hoverson, Chief
Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) of Provident, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Provident.


/s/ Robert L. Hoverson
----------------------
Robert L. Hoverson
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)


March 12, 2004


[A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Provident Financial Group, Inc. and will be retained by Provident
Financial Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.]
From: Riley, Marianne (MJ)

Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2012 10:37 AM

To: Alexander, Lillian (DEQ)

Subject: ADCOTE 76R36B/9L7 Diisocyanate Information (1

‐ 9QMS07)

Attachments: ADCOTE(TM) 76R36B MSDS

‐ US.PDF; COREACTANT 9L7 MSDS

‐ US.PDF; ADCOTETM

76R36B, rev 2012, CPDS.pdf; COREACTANT 9L7, rev 2012, CPDS.PDF

Subject: ADCOTETM 76R36B/COREACTANT 9L7 Adhesive System

Dear Ms. Alexander,

In response to your question of S eptember 18 2012, copied and pasted here:

Thank you for sending the CPDS for Coreactant 9L7. My interest is not how much Hexamethylene

Diisocyanate (H-D) is in Coreactant 9L7, but how much is emitted to the atmosphere. It is my

understanding that the purpose of the H-D in the coreactant is to facilitate a reaction and that all of the

H-D would not be expected to be emitted to the atmosphere. How much of the H-D wi ll react or bond in

the process and will not be emitted to the atmosphere?

As stated in the MSDS and CPDS (attached), ADCO TETM 76R36B does not contain isocyanates, while

COREACTANT 9L7 contains approximately 0.5% Hexa methylene Diisocyanate (HMDI), as supplied in

the original unopened container. At the recommended mix ratio of 100 parts ADCOTE 76R36B to 4

parts COREACTANT 9L7, the theoretical HMDI concentration in the wet adhesive blend is estimated to

be approximately 0.0192% by weight, or 192 ppm.

The diisocyanate is consumed (reacts with the polyester polymer) dur ing the drying and curing process.

The finished laminate structure is not expected to c ontain any residual diisocyanate. Our customers are

expected to use our Adhesive Systems in an industrial setting according to the guidelines stated in the

Material Safety Data Sheet, including proper ventilation and environmental controls.

Our information is based upon the theoretical compositi ons. We are disclosing this information, to the

best of our knowledge, based upon data from our raw material suppliers and knowledge of our

manufacturing processes. We believe our informat ion to be accurate and reliable as of this date.

Best Regards,

Marianne

Marianne Riley

Product Specialist – Performance Plastics

Customer Information Group

Dow Business Services LLC, Market & Sales Solutions

2007 Austin, Midland, MI 48674

E-mail: mjcikaloriley@dow.com

This information is considered accurate and reliable as of the date appearing above and is presented in good faith. Because us e conditions and

applicable laws may differ from one location to another and may change with time, recipient is responsible for determining whet her the information in

this document is appropriate for recipient's use. Since Dow has no control over how this information may ultimately be used, a ll liability is expressly

disclaimed and Dow assumes no obligation or liability therefore. No warranty, expressed or implied, is given nor is freedom fr om any patent owned by

The Dow Chemical Company or others to be inferred. 

### Pa g e 1 of 1

7/10/2013 file://D:\Adhesives\Technolo gy - Product Overview\CUR E\ADCOTE 76R36B w COREA

...
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1506 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1506

  Expressing profound sorrow over the death of Alexander Michel Odeh.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 25, 2024

    Mr. Correa (for himself and Ms. Tlaib) submitted the following 
   resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and 
                             Accountability

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Expressing profound sorrow over the death of Alexander Michel Odeh.

Whereas Alexander Michel Odeh was born in Jifna, Palestine, on April 4, 1944, 
        and resided in Orange County, California, for most of his adult life, 
        including Santa Ana;
Whereas Alex Odeh was a peace activist who worked to promote civil liberties for 
        Arab-Americans in the United States and for civil and human rights 
        around the world;
Whereas Alex Odeh was also a published poet and a lecturer of Arabic language at 
        Coastline College and California State University, Fullerton;
Whereas Alex Odeh was the Southern California Regional Director of the American-
        Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee (ADC) when, on October 11, 1985, he 
        was killed when a pipe bomb exploded as he entered the ADC office in 
        Santa Ana, California;
Whereas Alex Odeh is survived by his wife, Norma Odeh, and his three daughters, 
        Helena Odeh, Samya Odeh, and Susan Odeh; and
Whereas those responsible for the act of domestic terrorism which killed Alex 
        Odeh have yet to be brought to justice: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That--
            (1) the House of Representatives acknowledges with profound 
        sorrow the death of Alexander Michel Odeh, a victim of domestic 
        terrorism;
            (2) the House of Representatives tenders its deep sympathy 
        to the members of the family of the late Mr. Odeh and the 
        American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee in their 
        bereavement;
            (3) the Clerk of the House of Representatives will 
        communicate this resolution to the Senate and transmit a copy 
        thereof to the family of the deceased; and
            (4) when the House of Representatives adjourns today, it 
        adjourns as a further mark of respect to the memory of Mr. 
        Odeh.
                                 <all>
```
MEMORANDUM

TO: Addressees

 

FROM: The Secretary

SUBJECT: Delegation of Authority

I. DELEGATION

Under the authority vested in me by section 412 of the Department of Education 

Organization Act, 20 U.S.C. §3472, I hereby delegated to you, and to anyone 

serving for you in an acting capacity, for your respective Principal Office, the 

authority under 5 U.S.C. Section 3595(b)(3)(B), to file written objections to the 

Office of Personnel Management, when appropriate, based on your determination 

that the career Senior Executive Service employees referred failed to meet the 

technical qualifications for applicable position vacancies.

Unless otherwise noted in future delegations of authority, legislative amendments to 

the authorities delegated herein are included in the scope of this delegation.

II. RESERVATIONS

None.

III. REDELEGATION

This authority may not be redelegated.

IV. CERTIFICATION AND EFFECTIVE DATE

This delegation is effective upon certification by the Department’s Principal 

Delegations Control Officer and supersedes all previous delegation of this authority.

___________(Signed)___________ 

Richard W. Riley

OGC Clearance and Date: /s/ R. Wexler, 7/12/96

Certification Date: 7/31/96

Certified by Departmental Delegations Control Officer: /s/ Naty Beetle 

 

Control Number: EA/ES/54
Addressees and PO Control No.

EA/EB/137 – Deputy Secretary

EA/EC/185 – Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights

EA/EE/16 – Under Secretary

EA/EF/83 – Inspector General

EA/EG/79 – General Counsel

EA/EH/69 – Assistant Secretary for Special Education and Rehabilitative Services

EA/EJ/28 - Assistant Secretary for Legislation and Congressional Affairs

EA/EK/86 - Assistant Secretary for Intergovernmental and Interagency Affairs

EA/EL/62 – Chief Financial Officer

EA/EP/244 - Assistant Secretary for Postsecondary Education

EA/ES/54- Assistant Secretary for Elementary and Secondary Education

EA/EV/58 - Assistant Secretary for Vocational and Adult Education

EA/EI/2 - Chief Information Officer

EA/EN/2 - Chief Operating Officer, Federal Student Aid

EA/EQ/2 - Deputy Under Secretary for Safe and Drug-Free Schools

EA/ER/1 - Director, Institute of Education Sciences

EA/EU/2 - Deputy Under Secretary for Innovation and Improvement
EXHIBIT 32.1:

In connection with the annual report of Texas Vanguard oil Company, (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, William G. Watson, the Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.  The Report complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.  The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of the Company.


Date:  March 28, 2008

By/s/ William G. Watson
--------------------------
William G. Watson, President,
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
#### HALL et al. *vs.*GLOVER.

[APPEAL EEOM deceee in chancees: on settlement op tbtjst estate.]

1. *Trustee; when liable as for devastavit.*—Where a trustee applied the trust funds to the use of an estate of which he was administrator, and after-wards bought cotton of that estate, a portion of which he designed for the trust, but never set apart, and then sold the cotton for Confederate bonds, which he also sold, and made a partial settlement without any reference to these *transactions,*— Meld, that on his final settlement he was properly charged with the amount of the trust funds appropriated, with interest, in lawful money.

Appeal from tbe Chancery Court of Choctaw.

Heard before Hon. A. "W. Dillard.

The opinion states the facts.

Joshua Morse, for appellant.

Brooks, Haralson *&*Roy, and Glower *&*Coleman, *contra,*

cited 43 Ala. 371; ib. 460; ib. 489 ; 42 Ala. 656; ib. 410.

B. F. SAEEOLD, J.

The appeal is taken from the final settlement of the appellant’s accounts as trustee of Lavinia A. Hart, and the objection is to the refusal of the court to allow him a credit for $600.

From the testimony of the appellant- himself, it is shown that he used the funds of the trust estate for the benefit of the estate of Abney, of which he was the administrator* He afterwards sold some cotton belonging to that estate, and became the purchaser. Of this cotton, he considered that sis bales were paid for with the trust funds, but he had newer set thém apart. In 1863 he sold the cotton, including the six bales, to the Confederate government, and received payment in Confederate bonds. Afterwards he sold the bonds, but he never reported any of them as the *468property of the trust estate until after his partial settlement made in 1866.

From this statement, we think there is no error in the decree of the court. As the appellee, Glover, has died since the submission of this cause, the judgment of this court will be entered as of the term at which it was submitted for decision.

The decree is affirmed.
§ 935.90 General. ( a ) The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (28 U.S.C.) apply to civil actions in the Court to the extent the presiding Judge considers them applicable under the circumstances.
( b ) There is one form of action called the “Civil Action.”
( c ) Except as otherwise provided for in this part, there is no trial by jury.
( d ) A civil action begins with the filing of a complaint with the Court. The form of the complaint is as follows except as it may be modified to conform as appropriate to the particular action:
In the Wake Island Court [Civil Action No. ___] ______ (*Plaintiff*) vs. _______, (*Defendant*) Complaint ______ plaintiff alleges that the defendant is indebted to plaintiff in the sum of $___ that plaintiff has demanded payment of said sum; that defendant has refused to pay; that defendant resides at _____ on Wake Island; that plaintiff resides at ______.