alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>         5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the Form
10-Q for the period September 30, 1996 and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND> 
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                      29,806,065
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               11,365,083
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (25,000)
<INVENTORY>                                  3,702,049
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            45,504,582
<PP&E>                                      27,532,730
<DEPRECIATION>                            (21,471,094)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              52,352,574
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,999,034
<BONDS>                                      1,472,613
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       107,150
<OTHER-SE>                                  39,518,706
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                52,352,574
<SALES>                                      4,474,450
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,177,861
<CGS>                                        4,990,729
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  586,287
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             5,773,240
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             106,540
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,898,033)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,898,033)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,898,033)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.36)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.36)
        

</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

J.V.,

Petitioner

v.

C.K.,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 329 MAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 31st day of July, 2018

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
§ 2800.6 Delegation of classification and declassification authority. Pursuant to the provisions of sections 1-201 and 3-103 of E.O. 12065 of June 28, 1978, the following officials within the Office of the Vice President, are designated to originally classify and declassify information as “SECRET” and/or “CONFIDENTIAL”: ( a ) Chief of Staff to the Vice President.
( b ) Counsel to the Vice President.
( c ) Executive Assistant to the Vice President.
( d ) Assistant to the Vice President for National Security Affairs.
( e ) Assistant to the Vice President for Issues Development and Domestic Policy.
( f ) Additionally, the following individuals are designated to declassify “SECRET” and/or “CONFIDENTIAL” information in accordance with section 3-103 of E.O. 12065: ( i ) Staff Security Officer/Top Secret Control Officer.
( ii ) Assistant Staff Security Officer/Assistant Top Secret Control Officer.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Randy Downing, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered June 2, 1977, convicting him of sexual abuse in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Judgment affirmed (see *People v Jackson,*46 NY2d 721; *People v Iannone,*
      *86045 NY2d 589). We have considered the other contentions raised by defendant and find them to be without merit. Hopkins, J. P., Martuscello, Latham and Hawkins, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          61,658
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          20,000
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                47,752
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    141,764
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        984,456
<ALLOWANCE>                                     17,771
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,428,438
<DEPOSITS>                                   1,084,610
<SHORT-TERM>                                    56,926
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             21,526
<LONG-TERM>                                    133,004
<COMMON>                                         3,552
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     128,820
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,428,438
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 93,491
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               16,278
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 2,291
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               112,060
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              39,940
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              53,898
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           58,162
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    7,436
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               4,104
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 46,288
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 13,834
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      13,834
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,369
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.36
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.35
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.35
<LOANS-NON>                                     16,611
<LOANS-PAST>                                     2,832
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                11,149
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                16,365
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    7,124
<RECOVERIES>                                     1,094
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               17,771
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            17,771
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
Office of Communications and Outreach – eff. 6/19/2022

Organization chart

Graphic Version 

(An accessible text version can be found on the following page.)
Accessible Text Version 

Office of Communications and Outreach

Organization Chart

Effective 06/19/2022

• Rachel Thomas, Assistant Secretary

• Immediate Office of the Assistant Secretary

• Branden Cobb, DAS for Content Creation

• Daniel Miller, DAS for Management

• Management Support Unit: Jeanne Gilroy, Director

• Executive Office: Sheryl Adler, Director

• National Engagement: Kimberly Watkins-Foote, Director 

• State and Local Engagement: Adam Honeysett, Director

• Writing Melissa Apostolides, Director

• Digital Media and Creative Services: Sally Harris, Director

• Press and Customer Relations: Edward (Jim) Mould, Director
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Esterline Technologies Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-Q), I, Robert D. George,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)     The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)     The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.



|                         |  |  |  |     |  |                                         
|------------------------ |  |  |  | --- |  | ----------------------------------------
|Dated: September 4, 2009 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Robert D. George                    
|                         |  |  |  |     |  | Robert D. George                        
|                         |  |  |  |     |  | Vice President, Chief Financial Officer,
|                         |  |  |  |     |  | Secretary and Treasurer
### §2230. Employees in Alaska; subsistence, equipment, and supplies

The Secretary of Agriculture is authorized to furnish subsistence to employees of the United States Department of Agriculture in the Territory of Alaska, and to purchase personal equipment and supplies for them, and to make deductions to meet the cost thereof from any money appropriated for salary payments or otherwise due such employees.

(Feb. 16, 1931, ch. 200, 46 Stat. 1162.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 543a of Title 5 prior to the general revision and enactment of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees, by Pub. L. 89–554, §1, Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 378.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Repeal

Insofar as the provisions of this section relating to subsistence may conflict with those of sections 821 to 823, and 827 to 833 of former Title 5, which are now covered by sections 102, 105, 2105, 2106, 5701, 5705, 5707 and 5708 of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees, they were repealed by section 829 of former Title 5, which is now covered by section 5708 of Title 5.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Admission of Alaska as State

Admission of Alaska into the Union was accomplished Jan. 3, 1959, on issuance of Proc. No. 3269, Jan. 3, 1959, 24 F.R. 81, 73 Stat. c16, as required by sections 1 and 8(c) of Pub. L. 85–508, July 7, 1958, 72 Stat 339, set out as notes preceding section 21 of Title 48, Territories and Insular Possessions.
#### PEARSON v. C. P. BUCKNER STEEL ERECTION CO.

No. 452PA97

Case below: 126 N.C.App. 745

Petition by plaintiff and intervenors for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 allowed 6 November 1997.
### §442. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 442 was editorially reclassified as section 667f of Title 16, Conservation.
#### In the Matter of John Desimone, Respondent, v. New York State Liquor Autority, Appellant.

Order unanimously reversed, without costs of this appeal to either party, and proceeding remitted to Special Term for further proceedings in accordance with the memorandum. Memorandum: After this proceeding had been transferred to this court, Special Term had no jurisdiction to “decertify” the proceeding or to take any other action (in relation to the matter certified) without permission of this court. We agree with Special Term that the present answer is insufficient (Civ. Prac. Act, § 1291). The *proceeding*must be remitted to Special Term, with permission to the State Liquor Authority to move, within 15 days from the date of the order of this court, to amend the answer. If no such motion is made, Special Term shall so notify this court. If made, Special Term shall examine the proposed answer and if it is deemed sufficient to raise issues for determination by this court under section 1297 of the Civil Practice Act the answer shall be transmitted to this court to become a part of the record on appeal under Justice Fisher’s order of transfer. If Special Term should find such proposed answer insufficient or inadequate, then it shall remit the matter to the State Liquor Authority for appropriate proceedings. (Appeal from order of Brie Special Term decertifying to Special Term a proceeding which had been certified to the Appellate Division for determination, striking out the answer and return and annulling the determination of the Liquor Authority which revoked petitioner’s license.) Present-—Williams, P. J., Bastow, Goldman, McClusky and Henry, JJ.
### New Chemical Standard Review Exposure Report

Case No. P-07-0601 Date: EPA reviewer:

Name:

Use:



### Standard Review Summary Results:

Exposure Based Criteria

Parameter Exp Based Persistent Exceedance Value

Drinking (Surface) Water Dose

(mg/kg/day)

Fish Ingestion Dose (mg/kg/day)

Inhalation Dose (mg/kg/day)

Groundwater Dose (mg/kg/day)

Surface Water Release After Treatment

(kg/yr)

Total Release After Treatment (kg/yr)

Consumer exposure

Specific Exposure Scenarios: Po tential ingestion exposures e xpressed as mg/kg/day doses,

LADD-Potential Lifetime Average Daily Dose, ADR-Potential Acute Dose Rate

Potential inhalation exposures expressed as mg/m 3 concentrations.

INDUSTRIAL RELEASE SCENARIOS (modeled with E-FAST V 2.0)

Scenario: Manufacturing releases

Surface water exposures:

Inhalation exposures:

Incineration:

Fugitive:CONSUMER EXPOSURE SCENARIOS

Consumer exposure scenarios:

REFERENCES:
1

Schaffner, Karen S.

From: Bogany, Carolyn [Carolyn.Bogany@tpcgrp.com]

Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2011 2:42 PM

To: Schaffner, Karen S.; Textor, Marise L.

Cc: Shedd.Steve@epamail.epa.gov

Subject: RE: RTR MVL: facility centroid

Karen, the coordinates were verified and they do fall within the plant boundary. If you need any additional information, 

let us know. 

Thanks, 

Carolyn Coates Bogany 

Senior Environmental Engineer - HNO 

Carolyn.Bogany@tpcgrp.com 

TPC Group | www.tpcgrp.com 

Office: 713.475.7474 | Cell: 832.331.0572 | Fax: 713-475-7463 

8600 Park Place Blvd | Houston, Texas 77017 

From: Schaffner, Karen S. [mailto:ksschaffner@rti.org] 

Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2011 12:47 PM 

To: Textor, Marise L.; Bogany, Carolyn 

Cc: Shedd.Steve@epamail.epa.gov

Subject: RTR MVL: facility centroid 

Hi Marise: RTI’s GIS person suggested the following point as the facility centroid. Fyi. Have also attached the redrawn 

facility boundary map (still shows the emission point out to the left, but this point will be moved to the facility centroid). 

Thanks, Karen 

Lat: 29.698194 

Long: -95.255068
INL CAPABILITY 

Risk Mitigation and Management 

isk mitigation and management are fundamental steps in any efficient project 

execution. Systems Engineering in general, and Idaho National Laboratory (INL) 

Systems Engineering in particular, develops and employs advanced tools and 

techniques to maximize the efficiency of risk management efforts. 

Technical Risk Management 

Systems engineers at the INL follow a three-step approach to mitigating and managing risk: 

► Risk Assessment – Complex projects at the INL have a high degree of technical risk or 

uncertainty. Based on tools developed by the Department of Defense and NASA, along 

with some specific advances made at the INL, technical risks are identified in balance with 

the Technology Readiness Level (a way of measuring technical maturity) of the system in 

question to estimate project uncertainty in terms of cost or schedule. This ability is vital in 

accurately bounding total project costs or schedule. 

► Risk-Informed Decision Analysis – In addition to providing information needed for 

predicting cost and schedule, uncertainty is factored into selection criteria when evaluating 

two or more alternatives. Historically, decisions have been made based on the best guess 

of the performance of the given alternative with respect to a set of decision criteria that 

identify the goals or desires of the customer. That best guess may not be the best choice, 

especially if the decision needs to be made early in a project when the technologies are 

still maturing. The INL has developed special methods for analyzing and visualizing 

uncertainty as it relates not only to cost and schedule, but also to other performance 

criteria so that the range of performance possibility is understood and can be factored into 

the final decision. This may lead to the realization that the time is not right for a decision, 

and more information needs to be gathered. 

► Risk Response and Mitigation–The final piece to the technical risk management puzzle 

is the development of the plan to reduce the risk and uncertainty. By linking existing 

efforts to both known risk resolutions and technology maturity advancement, the overall 

uncertainty reduction 

rate of the plan can be 

predicted and 

accelerated. Such 

visualizations, called 

risk waterfall diagrams, 

serve to monitor and 

drive uncertainty 

reduction. 

All of these tools are combined 

to form a technical risk 

reduction strategy, sometimes 

referred to as a focused 

roadmap. The tools can be 

applied to technical or 

programmatic risk, including 

economic, stakeholder, and 

political risk. Additional details 

on this capability are available. 

Technical

Contacts 

Ron Klingler 

(208) 526-0183 

ron.klingler@inl.gov 

Lori Braase 

(208) 526-7763 

lori.braase@inl.gov 

Robert Caliva 

(208) 526-4653 

robert.caliva@inl.gov 

John Collins 

(208) 526-3372 

john.collins@inl.gov

Web Page 

http://www.inl.gov/syseng 

R
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1170 

Prohibiting Members of the House of Representatives from bringing or displaying a flag of a foreign nation on the floor of the House, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 26, 2024 

Mrs. CAMMACK (for herself, Mr. ALFORD, Mr. ALLEN, Mr. D’ESPOSITO, Mr. 

BILIRAKIS, Mr. TIMMONS, Mr. WENSTRUP, Mr. FINSTAD, Mr. VAN

DREW, Mr. VAN ORDEN, Mr. DONALDS, Mr. LUTTRELL, Mr. MILLS, 

Mrs. BICE, Ms. HAGEMAN, Mr. SMITH of Missouri, Mr. FRY, Mr. JACKSON of Texas, Mrs. LUNA, Mr. HARRIS, Mrs. HOUCHIN, Ms. 

MALLIOTAKIS, Mr. COLLINS, Mr. MILLER of Ohio, Mr. BABIN, Mrs. MILLER-MEEKS, Ms. MACE, Mrs. FISCHBACH, Ms. LEE of Florida, Mr. 

LANGWORTHY, Ms. MALOY, and Ms. TENNEY) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Rules 

RESOLUTION 

Prohibiting Members of the House of Representatives from 

bringing or displaying a flag of a foreign nation on 

the floor of the House, and for other purposes. 

1 Resolved, 

2 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION WITH RESPECT TO FLAG OF A 

3 FOREIGN NATION ON THE FLOOR OF THE 

4 HOUSE. 

5 (a) PROHIBITION.— 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HRES 1170 IH 

1 (1) IN GENERAL.—During a session of the 

2 House of Representatives, a Member, Delegate, or 

3 Resident Commissioner may not bring or display on 

4 the floor of the House any flag of a foreign nation. 

5 (2) APPLICATION.—Except as provided under 

6 subsection (b), the prohibition under subsection (a) 

7 shall apply to a flag of a foreign nation regardless 

8 of the size of the flag. 

9 (b) EXCEPTION.—The prohibition under subsection 

10 (a) shall not apply— 

11 (1) to a flag of a foreign nation worn as a lapel 

12 pin by a Member, Delegate, or Resident Commis13 sioner; or 

14 (2) to a depiction of a flag of a foreign nation 

15 used as part of an exhibit by a Member, Delegate, 

16 or Resident Commissioner during a speech or debate 

17 under the Rules of the House of Representatives. 

18 (c) ENFORCEMENT.—The Sergeant-at-Arms of the 

19 House of Representatives is charged with the enforcement 

20 of the prohibition under subsection (a). 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
<PAGE>   1




                                   EXHIBIT 11

                        COMPUTATION OF INCOME PER COMMON
                          AND COMMON EQUIVALENT SHARE







<PAGE>   2




                                  EXHIBIT (11)

                       Elcor Corporation and Subsidiaries
          Computation of Income Per Common and Common Equivalent Share

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(In thousands, except per share amounts)

1.       Three Months Ended March 31, 1997                       Three Months Ended
         and March 31, 1996                                       ---------------
                                                                  3-31-97 3-31-96
                                                                   ------  ------
<S>                                                                <C>     <C>   
         Net Income                                                $2,612  $2,321
                                                                   ======  ======

Shares:
  Weighted average common shares                                    8,801   8,764
    outstanding

Adjustments:
  (a)Assumed issuance of shares purchased
     under incentive stock option plan using
     the treasury stock method                                        107     111
                                                                   ------  ------

Total Common and Common Equivalent Shares                           8,908   8,875
                                                                   ======  ======

Income per Common and Common Equivalent Share                      $  .29  $  .26
                                                                   ======  ======
</TABLE>

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
2.       Nine Months Ended March 31, 1997                        Nine Months Ended
         and March 31, 1996                                      -----------------
                                                                 3-31-97    3-31-96
                                                                 -------    ------
<S>                                                              <C>        <C>   
         Net Income                                              $8,689     $8,108
                                                                 ======     ======

Shares:

    Total Common and Common Equivalent Shares

    Three months ended 9/30/96 and 9/30/95                        8,793      8,843
    Three months ended 12/31/96 and 12/31/95                      8,843      8,838
    Three months ended 3/31/97 and 3/31/96                        8,908      8,875
                                                                  ------     ------
    Average nine months ended 3/31/97 and 3/31/96                 8,848      8,852
                                                                  ======     ======

Income per Common and Common Equivalent Share                    $  .98     $  .92
                                                                 ======     ======
</TABLE>