alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

WASHINGTON, DC 

Skydive Myrtle Beach, Inc. 

Complainant/ Appellant 

v. 

FAA Docket 16-14-05 

Horry County (South Carolina) Department of Airports 

Respondent 

NOTICE OF EXTENSION OF TIME 

This matter is before the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) based on the abovereferenced complaint, filed in accordance with FAA Rules of Practice for Federally-Assisted 

Airport Enforcement Proceedings, 14 CFR, Part 16. Pursuant to 14 CFR, Part 16, subpart B, 

the date by which the Final Agency Decision will be issued in this matter is hereby extended 

to on or about May 23, 2016. 

~ yQ_;{._ J~ Eduardo A. Angeles 

~ssociate Administrator 

for Airports 

v;{" '\- ~c. Date 1 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on -? L{ _.{ ~ , I caused to be placed in the United 

States mail (first class mail, postage paid) a true copy of the Notice of Extension of Time, 

addressed to: 

Counsel for Complainant 

Robert G. Eastman, Esq. 

Eastman & Associates, LLC 

P.O. Box 180 

Charleston, SC 29402 

robertgeastman@msn.com 

Counsel for Respondent 

David Y. Bannard, Esq. 

Foley & Lardner LLP 

111 Huntington A venue 

Boston, MA 02199 

dbannard@foley .com 

Jeffrey R. Blease, Esq. 

Foley & Lardner LLP 

111 Huntington A venue 

Boston, MA 02199 

jblease@foley .com 

Jaclyn V. Piltch, Esq. 

Foley & Lardner LLP 

111 Huntington A venue 

Boston, MA 02199 

jpi1tch@foley .com 

Hand/Electronically Delivered to: 

FAA Part 16 Airport Proceedings Docket 

FAA Airport Compliance and Management Analysis, AC0-1 00 

FAA New England Region, AEA-600 

Claudia Roberts 

Airport Compliance and Management 

Analysis
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 20 - 0 078 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. STANLEY JOSEPH OLIVER,

Defendant and Appellant.

**G RANT**  Pursuant to authority granted under Mont. R. App. P. 26(1), the Appellant is given an extension of time until March 30 , 2022 , to prepare, file, and serve the Appellant’s reply brief. No further extensions will be granted.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

February 25 2022

02/25/2022

Case Number: DA 20-0078
Exhibit 32.2
                Certification of the Principal Financial Officer
                       pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with this quarterly report of Espey Mfg. & Electronics Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, David A. O'Neil,
Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

1.   The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in this report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: October 29, 2003


                                       /s/David A. O'Neil
                                       ----------------------------------
                                       David A. O'Neil
                                       Treasurer and Principal Financial Officer


                                       14
§ 776.23 Communication. ( a ) A covered attorney shall keep a client reasonably informed about the status of a matter and promptly comply with reasonable requests for information.
( b ) A covered attorney shall explain a matter to the extent reasonably necessary to permit the client to make informed decisions regarding the representation.
( c ) [Reserved]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

**ELMER DAVENPORT,**

**Appellant**

**v.**

**PA. BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE,** 

**Appellee :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 25 EAP 2015** 

**Appeal from The order of Commonwealth Court dated May 14,** 

**2015 at No. 145 M.D. 2015.**

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, **this 18 th**  **day of November 2015, the Order of the Commonwealth**

**Court is hereby** AFFIRMED

**.**
### §2264. National Agricultural Library; acceptance of gifts, bequests, or devises; conditional gifts

The Secretary of Agriculture is hereby authorized to accept, receive, hold, and administer on behalf of the United States gifts, bequests, or devises of real and personal property made unconditionally for the benefit of the National Agricultural Library or for the carrying out of any of its functions. Conditional gifts may be accepted and used in accordance with their provisions provided that no gift may be accepted which is conditioned on any expenditure not to be met therefrom or from the income thereof unless such expenditure has been approved by Act of Congress.

(Pub. L. 91–591, §2, Dec. 28, 1970, 84 Stat. 1588.)
p. 1 

# OAR Box 

# 1828 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 70 ) ll-K - (B ) -5 8 Docket Number: 

# A-83-2 7

Printed 11/12/200811:12:50 AM Sheet 70 of 325P. 2 

### If
II-K-(B)-5 8
SUMMAR YTABLE S FO

RSEVENT H ROUNDO F IFCA M RUNS . Lette r fro

m E . Medine , EE

A t o A . Wehe , EPA:SASD . Octobe r 2 , 1980 . THI S INFORMATION

CA N B E FOUNDI

N DOCKE T A-79-02 , ITE

M II-K-(B)-5 8
Editorial Note on Part 842
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 842 appear at 81 FR 83688, Nov. 22, 2016.

§ 842.82 Assertable claims. A claim may be asserted in writing for loss of or damage to government property, against a tort-feasor when: ( a ) Damage results from negligence and the claim is for: ( 1 ) More than $100.
( 2 ) Less than $100 but collection is practicable and economical.
( b ) The claim is based on a contract and the contracting officer does not intend to assert a claim under the contract. The contracting officer's intention not to assert a claim should be recorded in a memorandum for the record and placed in the claim file.
( c ) The claim is for property damage arising from the same incident as a hospital recovery claim.
( d ) The Tort-feasor or his insurer presents a claim against the government arising from the same incident. (Both claims should be processed together.)
( e ) The claim is assertable as a counterclaim under an international agreement. (The claim should be processed under subpart G of this part).
( f ) The claim is based on product liability. AFLOA/JACC approval must be obtained before asserting the claim.
[55 FR 2809, Jan. 29, 1990. Redesignated and amended at 81 FR 83696, Nov. 22, 2016]
### §3222c. Repealed. Pub. L. 113–79, title VII, §7114, Feb. 7, 2014, 128 Stat. 875

Section, Pub. L. 95–113, title XIV, §1448, as added Pub. L. 101–624, title XVI, §1612(c), Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 3723; amended Pub. L. 104–127, title VIII, §814, Apr. 4, 1996, 110 Stat. 1166; Pub. L. 105–185, title III, §301(a)(10), June 23, 1998, 112 Stat. 562; Pub. L. 107–171, title VII, §7110, May 13, 2002, 116 Stat. 433; Pub. L. 110–234, title VII, §7126, May 22, 2008, 122 Stat. 1223; Pub. L. 110–246, §4(a), title VII, §7126, June 18, 2008, 122 Stat. 1664, 1984, related to national research and training virtual centers.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 1448 of Pub. L. 95–113, title XIV, Sept. 29, 1977, 91 Stat. 1011, amended sections 1923 and 1942 of this title, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 101–624, title XVI, §1601(f)(1)(D), Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 3704.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996                       
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996    
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996    
<CASH>                                     266,045    
<SECURITIES>                               0    
<RECEIVABLES>                              1,506,113    
<ALLOWANCES>                               100,000    
<INVENTORY>                                233,590    
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           1,942,142    
<PP&E>                                     785,051    
<DEPRECIATION>                             578,032    
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             2,161,092    
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      1,514,789    
<BONDS>                                    0    
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      0    
<PREFERRED>                                0    
<COMMON>                                   487,291   
<OTHER-SE>                                 146,959    
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               2,161,092    
<SALES>                                    5,013,023    
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           5,013,023    
<CGS>                                      2,609,901    
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              5,648,146    
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           20,128    
<LOSS-PROVISION>                           0    
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         0    
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (614,995)    
<INCOME-TAX>                               0   
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (614,995)    
<DISCONTINUED>                             0    
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            0    
<CHANGES>                                  0    
<NET-INCOME>                               (614,995)    
<EPS-PRIMARY>                              (.19)    
<EPS-DILUTED>                              (.19)   
        


</TABLE>
§ 776.46 Attorney as witness. ( a ) A covered attorney shall not act as advocate at a trial in which the covered attorney is likely to be a necessary witness except when: ( 1 ) The testimony relates to an uncontested issue;
( 2 ) The testimony relates to the nature and quality of legal services rendered in the case; or
( 3 ) Disqualification of the covered attorney would work substantial hardship on the client.
( b ) A covered attorney may act as advocate in a trial in which another attorney in the covered attorney's office is likely to be called as a witness, unless precluded from doing so by § 776.26 or § 776.28 of this part.
( c ) [Reserved]
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 5 (Friday, January 8, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 1501]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-00059]



[[Page 1501]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION

[Notice-MA-2020-15; Docket No. 2020-0002, Sequence No. 43]


2021 Privately Owned Vehicle (POV) Mileage Reimbursement Rates; 
2021 Standard Mileage Rate for Moving Purposes

AGENCY: Office of Government-wide Policy (OGP), General Services 
Administration (GSA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: GSA is updating the mileage reimbursement rate for privately 
owned automobiles (POA), airplanes, and motorcycles as required by 
statute. This information will be available in FTR Bulletin 21-03, 
which can be found on GSA's website at https://gsa.gov/ftrbulletins.

DATES: Applicability date: This notice applies to travel and relocation 
performed on or after January 1, 2021 through December 31, 2021.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For clarification of content, please 
contact Ms. Cheryl D. McClain-Barnes, Program Analyst, Office of 
Government-wide Policy, Office of Asset and Transportation Management, 
at 202-208-4334, or by email at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7105031007141d011e1d181208311602105f161e07"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="0f7b7d6e796a637f6063666c764f687c6e21686079">[email protected]</span></a>. Please cite 
Notice of FTR Bulletin 21-03.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: GSA is required by statute to set the 
mileage reimbursement rate for privately owned automobiles (POA) as the 
single standard mileage rate established by the Internal Revenue 
Service (IRS). The IRS mileage rate for medical or moving purposes is 
used to determine the POA rate when a Government-furnished automobile 
is authorized and also represents the privately owned vehicle (POV) 
standard mileage reimbursement rate for official relocation. Finally, 
GSA conducts independent reviews of the cost of travel and the 
operation of privately owned airplanes and motorcycles on an annual 
basis to determine their corresponding mileage reimbursement rates. 
These reviews evaluate various factors, such as the cost of fuel, 
depreciation of the original vehicle cost, maintenance and insurance, 
state and Federal taxes, and consumer price index data. FTR Bulletin 
21-03 establishes and announces the new CY 2021 POV mileage 
reimbursement rates for official temporary duty and relocation travel. 
This notice is the only notification to agencies of revisions to the 
POV mileage rates for official travel and relocation, other than the 
changes posted on GSA's website at https://gsa.gov/mileage.

    Authority: 5 U.S.C. 5707

Jessica Salmoiraghi,
Associate Administrator, Office of Government-Wide Policy.
[FR Doc. 2021-00059 Filed 1-7-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-14-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
   THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM SEC FORM
10-K AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                            YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                             JAN-31-1998
<CASH>                                         4,939
<SECURITIES>                                   1,496
<RECEIVABLES>                                  9,716
<ALLOWANCES>                                     527
<INVENTORY>                                        0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              16,695
<PP&E>                                         7,881
<DEPRECIATION>                                 5,614
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                20,045
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          6,947
<BONDS>                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                      271
<COMMON>                                         132
<OTHER-SE>                                    12,695
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  20,045
<SALES>                                       17,202
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              22,417
<CGS>                                          3,039
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 17,442
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               8,266
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 250
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 8
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (8,326)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (8,326)
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (8,326)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.64)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.64)
        


</TABLE>
THE SECRETARY OF EDUCATION

WASHINGTON, DC 20202

MEMORANDUM

TO: Designated Agency Ethics Official

FROM: The Secretary

SUBJECT: Delegation of Authority to Issue Waivers Under the Conflict-of-Interest Statute 

I. Delegation

Under the authority vested in me by section 412 of the Department of Education 

Organization Act (DEOA), 20 U.S.C. 3472, I hereby delegate to you the authority to 

issue an individual waiver of a conflict of interest in accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 208(b), 

and to serve as the agency designee for the purpose of issuing individual waivers under 

the following regulations:

A. 5 C.F.R. § 2635.402 – Disqualifying Financial Interest 

B. 5 C.F.R. § 2635.503 – Extraordinary Payments from Former Employers

This section of the Standard of Ethical Conduct for Employee of the Executive 

Branch provides that those individuals granted the authority to issue individual 

waivers under 18 U.S.C. § 208(b) may also be delegated the authority to issue a 

waiver permitting an employee to participate in a matter in which the employee’s 

former employer is, or represents, a party, even though the employer had paid an 

“extraordinary payment” to the employee prior to joining the Department. 

C. 5 C.F.R. § 2635.605 – Waiver or Authorization Permitting Participation While

Seeking Employment

D. 5 C.F.R. § 2640.301 – Waivers Issued Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 208(b)(1) 

E. 5 C.F.R. § 2640.302 – Waivers Issued Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 208(b)(3)

II. Reservations

The authority to issue waivers pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 208(b) and the regulations 

referenced in paragraph I, for the Deputy Secretary, the Under Secretary, or the General 

Counsel of the U.S. Department of Education is reserved to the Secretary, with 

concurrence of the Designated Agency Ethics Official. The authority to issue waivers 

pursuant to theses authorities for the Designated Agency Ethics Official is reserved to the 

Secretary. 

III. Redelegations

This authority may not be further delegated.
Page 2 – Delegation of Authority

IV. Certification and Effective Date

This delegation is effective upon certification by the Department’s Principal Delegation 

Control Officer and supersedes all previous delegations of these authorities. I hereby 

ratify actions within the scope of this delegation taken by you, your predecessors in 

function, or anyone serving in an acting capacity or officially performing the functions 

and duties of your position, which involved the exercise of the authorities delegated 

herein, prior to the date of the certification of this delegation. 

Miguel A. Cardona, Ed.D. (signed) 

OGC Concurrence and Date: Michael Taylor, 1/5/2023 

Date Certified: 1/5/2023

Delegations Control Officer: Jim Clemmens

Control Number: EA/EGR3/131
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. John Francis McTiernan, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant: (1) from a judgment of the County Court,' Suffolk County, rendered June 30, 1959, convicting him of robbery in the second degree and grand larceny in the first degree, and imposing sentence; and (2) from every intermediate order made in the action, Judgment affirmed. No opinion. Appeal from intermediate orders dismissed, No separate appeal lies from the intermediate orders, which have been reviewed on the appeal from the judgment of conviction. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Ughetta, Kleinfeld and Christ, JJ., concur.
(May 14, 1964)

#### In the Matter of East 53rd Inc., Respondent, v. Hortense W. Gabel, as City Rent and Rehabilitation Administrator, Appellant.

Order, entered

on March 26, 1963, revoking an order of respondent City Rent Commissioner which denied petitioner’s application for a hardship rent increase reversed on the law and on the facts, and the petition dismissed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the appellant. Respondent rejected petitioner’s application for a hardship rent increase on several grounds. Primarily it appears that the property sold for $550,000, of which the buyer paid $100,000 in cash. *648This is less than 20%. Special Term was of the opinion that the variation from the ratio of 20% fixed by the respondent was so slight that reliance on this ratio amounts to an abuse of discretion. On the contrary, once the respondent has shown a reasonable basis for the ratio adopted by her, it becomes the burden of the landlord to show that the use of the ratio is so unreasonable as to be arbitrary. Here there was no such showing. The 20% ratio is firmly established by custom as a minimum norm, and its absence, no matter how slight, can rightly be taken by respondent as an indication of abnormal financing. This was only one factor in the picture. Other divergences confirm that the financing was abnormal. Concur — Botein, P. J., Rabin, McNally and Eager, JJ.; Stevens, J., dissents and votes to affirm.
December 15, 2015

Docket Operations, M-30

U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT)

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE

Room W12-140, West Building Ground Floor

Washington, D.C. 20590-0001

RE: Request to amend and allow for the University of North Dakota the ability to utilize 

additional sUAS platforms under the same direction as the proposed exemption under 

consideration, docket # FAA-2015-6119-0001, submitted August 31, 2015.

Dear Sir or Madam,

Since the original submission of a petition for exemption by the University of North Dakota in 

August 2015, a UAS platform selection change has been made for its proposed undergraduate 

flight training program. As such, the University is requesting the addition of the Sensurion 

Magpie Trainer MP-T be added to the petition for exemption (FAA-2015-6119-0001).

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me via email: hastings@aero.und.edu or 

(701) 777-3380.

Sincerely,

Mark Hastings

UND Aerospace

UAS Chief Pilot