alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           2,094
<SECURITIES>                                       942
<RECEIVABLES>                                   16,110
<ALLOWANCES>                                       541
<INVENTORY>                                      6,289
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                25,552
<PP&E>                                           8,270
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,229
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  49,231
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           22,939
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         51
<COMMON>                                           240
<OTHER-SE>                                      25,858
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    49,231
<SALES>                                         37,777
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                37,777
<CGS>                                           23,526
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   31,893
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,227
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (2,863)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (19,869)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (126)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (19,743)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   (498)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (20,241)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.01)


</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
                            THREE-FIVE SYSTEMS, INC.
                 STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
                                   EXHIBIT 11
                                   (UNAUDITED)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                        THREE MONTHS ENDED                   SIX MONTHS ENDED
                                                              JUNE 30,                           JUNE 30,
                                                    ---------------------------       ---------------------------

                                                       1997             1996             1997             1996
                                                    ----------       ----------       ----------       ----------
<S>                                                 <C>              <C>              <C>              <C>
Common shares outstanding beginning of period        7,762,129        7,737,095        7,757,329        7,735,745

Effect of Weighting Shares:
  Employee stock options exercised                      92,856           37,699           50,018           19,952
  Employee stock options outstanding                   204,989          257,469          245,870          281,069
                                                    ----------       ----------       ----------       ----------

Primary                                              8,059,974        8,032,263        8,053,217        8,036,766
                                                    ==========       ==========       ==========       ==========

Common shares outstanding beginning of period        7,762,129        7,737,095        7,757,329        7,735,745

Effect of Weighting Shares:
  Employee stock options exercised                      92,856           37,699           50,018           19,952
  Employee stock options outstanding                   215,623          257,469          255,915          281,070
                                                    ----------       ----------       ----------       ----------

Fully diluted                                        8,070,608        8,032,263        8,063,262        8,036,767
                                                    ==========       ==========       ==========       ==========

Net income                                          $1,028,000       $  170,000       $1,829,000       $  892,000
                                                    ==========       ==========       ==========       ==========

NET INCOME PER COMMON AND
  COMMON EQUIVALENT SHARES:

Net income per share

  Primary                                           $     0.13       $     0.02       $     0.23       $     0.11
                                                    ==========       ==========       ==========       ==========
  Fully diluted                                     $     0.13       $     0.02       $     0.23       $     0.11
                                                    ==========       ==========       ==========       ==========
</TABLE>
### §252. Suspension or revocation of licenses

#### (a) In general

After providing notice and an opportunity for a hearing in accordance with this section, the Secretary may suspend or revoke any license issued, or approval for an activity provided, under this chapter—

(1) for a material violation of, or failure to comply, with any provision of this chapter (including regulations promulgated under this chapter); or

(2) on the ground that unreasonable or exorbitant charges have been imposed for services rendered.

#### (b) Temporary suspension

The Secretary may temporarily suspend a license or approval for an activity under this chapter prior to an opportunity for a hearing for any violation of, or failure to comply with, any provision of this chapter (including regulations promulgated under this chapter).

#### (c) Authority to conduct hearings

The agency within the Department that is responsible for administering regulations promulgated under this chapter shall have exclusive authority to conduct any hearing required under this section.

#### (d) Judicial review

#### (1) Jurisdiction

A final administrative determination issued subsequent to a hearing may be reviewable only in a district court of the United States.

#### (2) Procedure

The review shall be conducted in accordance with the standards set forth in section 706(2) of title 5.

(Aug. 11, 1916, ch. 313, pt. C, §13, as added Pub. L. 106–472, title II, §201, Nov. 9, 2000, 114 Stat. 2067.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 252, acts Aug. 11, 1916, ch. 313, pt. C, §11, 39 Stat. 487; Feb. 23, 1923, ch. 106, 42 Stat. 1283; Mar. 2, 1931, ch. 366, §6, 46 Stat. 1464, authorized license to classify, grade, or weigh agricultural products, prior to the general amendment of this chapter by Pub. L. 106–472. See section 242 of this title.

A prior section 13 of act Aug. 11, 1916, ch. 313, pt. C, was classified to section 254 of this title, prior to the general amendment of this chapter by Pub. L. 106–472.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

ORDER OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE

It appearing that 11 C 9143, Helferich Patent Licensing v. J.S. Penney, pending before the

Hon. Samuel Der-Yeghiayan, has been identified for transfer to the Patent Case Pilot Program in

which this Court is participating, therefore

It is hereby ordered that 11 C 9143, Helferich Patent Licensing v. J.S. Penney, is to be

reassigned by lot to one of the district judges participating in the pilot program.

ENTER:

FOR THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE

 Chief Judge James F. Holderman

Dated at Chicago, Illinois this 11th day of January, 2012

Case: 1:11-cv-09143 Document #: 14 Filed: 01/11/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:51
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

					NO. 2-03-274-CR

LEERA K. CHU               				         		APPELLANT

	V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS	STATE

	----------

	FROM THE 297TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

	----------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

	----------

	We have considered appellant's “Motion To Dismiss Appeal.”  The motion complies with rule 42.2(a) of the rules of appellate procedure. Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a).  No decision of this court having been delivered before we received this motion, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal.  See id.; Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f).

								PER CURIAM

PANEL D:	MCCOY, J., CAYCE, C.J.; and LIVINGSTON, J.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: May 27, 2004.
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 213 (Tuesday, November 4, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 65474]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-26199]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 8936]

In the Matter of the Review of the Designation of National 
Liberation Army Also Known as ELN Also Known as Ejercito de Liberacion 
Nacional as a Foreign Terrorist Organization Pursuant to Section 219 of 
the Immigration and Nationality Act, as Amended

    Based upon a review of the Administrative Record assembled in these 
matter pursuant to Section 219(a)(4)(C) of the Immigration and 
Nationality Act, as amended (8 U.S.C. 1189(a)(4)(C)) (``INA''), and in 
consultation with the Attorney General and the Secretary of the 
Treasury, I conclude that the circumstances that were the basis for the 
2008 decision to maintain the designation of the aforementioned 
organization as a Foreign Terrorist Organization have not changed in 
such a manner as to warrant revocation of the designation and that the 
national security of the United States does not warrant a revocation of 
the designation.
    Therefore, I hereby determine that the designation of the 
aforementioned organization as a Foreign Terrorist Organization, 
pursuant to Section 219 of the INA (8 U.S.C. 1189), shall be 
maintained.
    This determination shall be published in the Federal Register.

John F. Kerry,
Secretary of State.
[FR Doc. 2014-26199 Filed 11-3-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-10-P
```
p. 1 

# OAR Box 1830 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 91 ) IV-C-5

7 Docket Number: 

# A-87-1 1

Printed 11/13/20087:20:56

AM Sheet 91 of 232P. 2

I S95 Z? UNITE D STATE S ENVIRONMENTA LPROTECTIO NAGENC Y V*** £WASHINGTON , D.C . 2046 0 **y "W ^ -" • . FE B 2 !98 R

OFFIC E O F AI RAN D RADIATIO N Honorabl e Joh

n G . Rowlan

d Hous e o f Representative s Washington , D C 2051 5 Dea r Mr . Rowland : Thi s i n respons e t o you r January11 , 198 8 lette r relaying the concern s o f on e o f you r constituent s regarding EPA' s regulatoryproposa l t o requir e onboar d canister s o n ne w vehicle s t o contro l refueling emissions . Pe r you r request , I hav e enclose d a copyo f ou r proposa l fo r you r review . Sectio n E (page s 31177-31182 ) explain s EPA' s overal l rational e fo r proposing onboar d controls . I f yo u woul d lik e furthe r detail s o f ou r analysis , pleas e contac t Mr . Phili p Carlso n o f th * Standard s Developmen t an d Suppor t Branc h o f th e Emissidh Contro l Technolog

yDivision , 256 5 Plymout h Road , Ann Arbor , tiL 4810 5 (FTS 374-827 0 o r Commercia l (313 ) 668-4270) . Than k yo u fo r you r letter . W e wil l plac e you r lette r an d the lette r fro

mMr . Frederic k Blasiu s i n ou r publi c docke t an d full yconside r the comment s i n the nex t phas e o f ou r rulemaking process . Sincerel yyours , ORIGINA LSIGNE D B Y RICHAR D D . WILSO N RichardD . Wilson Director , Offic e o

f Mobile Source s Enclosur e cc : Docke t A-87-1 1
### §1520. Producer eligibility

Except as otherwise provided in this subchapter, a producer shall not be denied insurance under this subchapter if—

(1) for purposes of catastrophic risk protection coverage, the producer is a "person" (as defined by the Secretary); and

(2) for purposes of any other plan of insurance, the producer is 18 years of age and has a bona fide insurable interest in a crop as an owner-operator, landlord, tenant, or sharecropper.

(Feb. 16, 1938, ch. 30, title V, §520, as added Pub. L. 92–357, July 28, 1972, 86 Stat. 501; amended Pub. L. 103–354, title I, §113, Oct. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 3203; Pub. L. 110–234, title XII, §12033(c)(2)(B), May 22, 2008, 122 Stat. 1405; Pub. L. 110–246, §4(a), title XII, §12033(c)(2)(B), June 18, 2008, 122 Stat. 1664, 2167.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Pub. L. 110–234 and Pub. L. 110–246 made identical amendments to this section. The amendments by Pub. L. 110–234 were repealed by section 4(a) of Pub. L. 110–246.

#### Amendments

2008—Pub. L. 110–246, §12033(c)(2)(B), substituted "this subchapter" for "this chapter" in two places in introductory provisions.

1994—Pub. L. 103–354 substituted "Producer eligibility" for "Persons under twenty-one years of age" in section catchline and amended text generally. Prior to amendment, text read as follows: "Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be denied insurance under this chapter solely on the ground that he is under twenty-one years of age if such person is (1) over eighteen years of age, and (2) has a bona fide insurable interest in a crop as an owner-operator, landlord, tenant or sharecropper: Provided, That any such person who enters into a Federal Crop Insurance contract shall be subject to the same legal liability and have the same legal rights with respect to such contract as any person over the age of twenty-one years."

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2008 Amendment

Amendment of this section and repeal of Pub. L. 110–234 by Pub. L. 110–246 effective May 22, 2008, the date of enactment of Pub. L. 110–234, see section 4 of Pub. L. 110–246, set out as an Effective Date note under section 8701 of this title.

#### Effective Date of 1994 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 103–354 effective Oct. 13, 1994, and applicable to provision of crop insurance under Federal Crop Insurance Act (7 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.) beginning with 1995 crop year, with such Act, as in effect on the day before Oct. 13, 1994, to continue to apply with respect to 1994 crop year, see section 120 of Pub. L. 103–354, set out as a note under section 1502 of this title.
### §1433c. Advance recourse commodity loans

Notwithstanding any other provision of this Act, the Secretary may make advance recourse loans available to producers of the commodities of the 1986 through 1990 crops for which nonrecourse loans are made available under this Act if the Secretary finds that such action is necessary to ensure that adequate operating credit is available to producers. Such recourse loans may be made available under such reasonable terms and conditions as the Secretary may prescribe, except that the Secretary shall require that a producer obtain crop insurance for the crop as a condition of eligibility for a loan.

(Oct. 31, 1949, ch. 792, title IV, §424, as added Pub. L. 99–198, title X, §1003, Dec. 23, 1985, 99 Stat. 1447.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This Act, referred to in text, is act Oct. 31, 1949, ch. 792, 63 Stat. 1051, known as the Agricultural Act of 1949, which is classified principally to this chapter (§1421 et seq.). For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1421 of this title and Tables.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective and Termination Dates

Pub. L. 99–198, title X, §1003, Dec. 23, 1985, 99 Stat. 1447, provided that this section is effective for the 1986 through 1990 crops.

#### Inapplicability of Section

Section inapplicable to 2014 through 2018 crops of covered commodities, cotton, and sugar and inapplicable to milk during period beginning Feb. 7, 2014, through Dec. 31, 2018, see section 9092(b)(10) of this title.

Section inapplicable to 2008 through 2012 crops of covered commodities, peanuts, and sugar and inapplicable to milk during period beginning June 18, 2008, through Dec. 31, 2012, see section 8782(b)(10) of this title.

Section inapplicable to 2002 through 2007 crops of covered commodities, peanuts, and sugar and inapplicable to milk during period beginning May 13, 2002, through Dec. 31, 2007, see section 7992(b)(10) of this title.

Section inapplicable to 1996 through 2002 crops of loan commodities, peanuts, and sugar and inapplicable to milk during period beginning Apr. 4, 1996, and ending Dec. 31, 2002, see section 7301(b)(1)(J) of this title.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 4.2

Eastern Division

United State Of America

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:11−cv−05937

Unassigned

Aimee Krause

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Monday, August 29, 2011:

 MINUTE entry before Honorable Jeffrey T. Gilbert: Pro Se Defendant contacted

the Clerk's Office regarding her concern that certain confidential information is visible in

three of the attached exhibits in the Government's complaint [1] filed on 8/26/11.

Therefore, the Clerk's Office has temporarily restricted Exhibits A, C, and E of the

complaint [1] (attachments #1, #3 and #5). Plaintiff's counsel is directed to properly redact

and refile those exhibits via the CM/ECF system. Once the redacted exhibits have been

refiled, the Clerk shall replace the restricted exhibits with the redacted versions of those

exhibits. Mailed notice(ep, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:11-cv-05937 Document #: 5 Filed: 08/29/11 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:28
### §434. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 434 was editorially reclassified as a note under section 399 of this title.
January 23, 2012 Mr. Jim Downing Executive Director Human Studies Review Board Office of the Science Advisor U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Washington, D.C. 20460 Tim Boyle 103 West 6 th Street Ba yonne NJ 07002 Re: USEPA Docket ID No. EPA

- HQ
- ORD
- 2 011
- 0954

Comment to the Record Dear Mr. Downing: I am an emplo ye e of the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP). On January 9, 2012, I posted a comment to the referenced public docket from my work computer, using NJDEP’s “Groupwise ” email s ys tem and noting my official title and web address. Although I posted the comment on human studies from my NJDEP account, Idid not intend to speak on behalf of the Department, nor was I granted authority by m y supervisors to do so. Rather, th e comment was intended solely to express my

personal opinions and views. I submit this letter to y ou i n order to correct the public record and address any misperceptions that may have arisen as a result of my unauthorized use of NJDEP’s Groupwise email s ys tem and my official state title and address to express a personal opinion. Please consider m y J anuary 9, 2012 comment to be that from a private citizen. I understand that this public docket was established to accept comments in advance of a meeting of the USEPA Human Studies Review Board which is scheduled to be held on January 26, 2012. To the extent that the public docket remains open, please accept this clarification of my prior public comment. If you have an y questions regarding this matter, ple ase contact me directly at the personal address above. Thank yo u . Sincerel y,
Tim Boylec : Magdalena Padilla, NJDEP Chief of Staff

Wolfgang Skacel, NJDEP Assistant Commissioner John Castner, NJDEP Director Roy Mey er, NJDEP Chief Debra Ewalt, NJDEP Director Roseanne Rossi, NJDEP Manager
### §422. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act May 29, 1928, ch. 892, §1, 45 Stat. 981, directed Secretary of Agriculture to establish a dairying station in Lewisburg, Tennessee, and was omitted from the Code as obsolete.
### §1393. Allotment of appropriations

All funds for carrying out the provisions of this chapter shall be available for allotment to bureaus and offices of the Department, and for transfer to such other agencies of the Federal Government, and to such State agencies, as the Secretary may request to cooperate or assist in carrying out the provisions of this chapter.

(Feb. 16, 1938, ch. 30, title III, §393, 52 Stat. 70.)
§ 631.5 General. AFDCBs may be established by installation, base, or station commanders to advise and make recommendations to commanders on matters concerning eliminating conditions, which adversely affect the health, safety, welfare, morale, and discipline of the Armed Forces. ( a ) For the Army, routine off-limits actions must be processed by an AFDCB following the procedures in § 631.11.
( b ) Coast Guard commanders must have written authorization from the Commandant (G-WP) prior to establishing an AFDCB.
### §2204–3. Authority of designated employees; retroactive revocation of delegation

Whenever a delegation is made under section 2204–2 of this title, all provisions of law shall be construed as if the regulatory function or the part thereof delegated had (to the extent of the delegation) been vested by law in the individual to whom the delegation is made, instead of in the Secretary of Agriculture. A revocation of delegation shall not be retroactive, and each regulatory function or part thereof performed (within the scope of the delegation) by such individual prior to the revocation shall be considered as having been performed by the Secretary.

(Apr. 4, 1940, ch. 75, §3, 54 Stat. 82.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 450e of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section, and to section 516c of Title 5 prior to the general revision and enactment of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees, by Pub. L. 89–554, §1, Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 378.
EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8
(Nos. 333-134316, 333-117489, 33-53589, 2-94436, 333-57608, 333-57575, 333-46901, 333-41363,
333-65265, 333-41904, 333-37308, 333-70560 and 33-63958) of our reports dated August 27, 2009, with respect to the consolidated
financial statements and schedule of International Rectifier Corporation and Subsidiaries and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of International Rectifier Corporation and
Subsidiaries included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended June 28, 2009.

/s/
Ernst & Young LLP
Los Angeles, California
August 27, 2009

---



QuickLinks
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT 

ERRATA

 August 24, 2007 

Appeal No. 06-M830 

IN RE SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY, LLC

Precedential Opinion 

Decided: August 20, 2007 

In the opinion for the court, the following changes have been made: 

On page 8, lines 15-16, "Quantum Corp. v. Plus Development Corp., 940 F.2d 642, 643 

(Fed. Cir. 1991)" has been replaced with "Quantum Corp. v. Tandon Corp., 940 F.2d 

642, 643 (Fed. Cir. 1991)".

On page 21, line 9, “patentee” has been changed to “party”.