alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §§3005, 3006. Repealed. Pub. L. 115–334, title X, §10102(c)(5)(B), Dec. 20, 2018, 132 Stat. 4898

Section 3005, Pub. L. 94–463, §6, as added Pub. L. 107–171, title X, §10605(a), May 13, 2002, 116 Stat. 513; amended Pub. L. 110–234, title X, §10106, May 22, 2008, 122 Stat. 1337; Pub. L. 110–246, §4(a), title X, §10106, June 18, 2008, 122 Stat. 1664, 2098; Pub. L. 112–240, title VII, §701(g)(1), Jan. 2, 2013, 126 Stat. 2366; Pub. L. 113–79, title X, §10003, Feb. 7, 2014, 128 Stat. 940, established the Farmers' Market and Local Food Promotion Program.

A prior section 3005, Pub. L. 94–463, §6, Oct. 8, 1976, 90 Stat. 1983; Pub. L. 103–437, §4(a)(8), Nov. 2, 1994, 108 Stat. 4582, related to review of activities by Secretary and annual report to Congress, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 105–362, title I, §101(d)(1), Nov. 10, 1998, 112 Stat. 3281.

Section 3006, Pub. L. 94–463, §7, Oct. 8, 1976, 90 Stat. 1983; Pub. L. 105–362, title I, §101(d)(2), Nov. 10, 1998, 112 Stat. 3281, related to authorization of appropriations.
### §361b. Congressional statement of policy; researches, investigations and experiments

It is further the policy of the Congress to promote the efficient production, marketing, distribution, and utilization of products of the farm as essential to the health and welfare of our peoples and to promote a sound and prosperous agriculture and rural life as indispensable to the maintenance of maximum employment and national prosperity and security. It is also the intent of Congress to assure agriculture a position in research equal to that of industry, which will aid in maintaining an equitable balance between agriculture and other segments of our economy. It shall be the object and duty of the State agricultural experiment stations through the expenditure of the appropriations hereinafter authorized to conduct original and other researches, investigations, and experiments bearing directly on and contributing to the establishment and maintenance of a permanent and effective agricultural industry of the United States, including researches basic to the problems of agriculture in its broadest aspects, and such investigations as have for their purpose the development and improvement of the rural home and rural life and the maximum contribution by agriculture to the welfare of the consumer, as may be deemed advisable, having due regard to the varying conditions and needs of the respective States.

(Mar. 2, 1887, ch. 314, §2, 24 Stat. 440; Aug. 11, 1955, ch. 790, §1, 69 Stat. 671.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 363 of this title.

#### Amendments

1955—Act Aug. 11, 1955, amended section generally to restate the policy of Congress.
### §1949. Graduation of borrowers with operating loans or guarantees to private commercial credit

The Secretary shall establish a plan, in coordination with activities under sections 2006a, 2006b, 2006c, and 2006d of this title, to encourage each borrower with an outstanding loan under this subchapter or with respect to whom there is an outstanding guarantee under this subchapter to graduate to private commercial or other sources of credit.

(Pub. L. 87–128, title III, §319, as added Pub. L. 102–554, §9, Oct. 28, 1992, 106 Stat. 4150; amended Pub. L. 104–127, title VI, §617, Apr. 4, 1996, 110 Stat. 1090; Pub. L. 113–79, title V, §5107, Feb. 7, 2014, 128 Stat. 838.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2014—Pub. L. 113–79 struck out subsec. (a) designation and heading before "The Secretary" and struck out subsec. (b) which related to limitation on period borrowers were eligible for guaranteed assistance under this subchapter and contained transition rule.

1996—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 104–127 added subsec. (b) and struck out former subsec. (b) which provided for limitation on period for which borrowers were eligible for assistance under this subchapter and contained transition rule.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Suspension of Limitation on Period for Which Borrowers Are Eligible for Guaranteed Assistance

Pub. L. 107–171, title V, §5102, May 13, 2002, 116 Stat. 343, as amended by Pub. L. 109–467, §1, Dec. 22, 2006, 120 Stat. 3485; Pub. L. 110–234, title V, §5103, May 22, 2008, 122 Stat. 1146; Pub. L. 110–246, §4(a), title V, §5103, June 18, 2008, 122 Stat. 1664, 1908, provided for the suspension of former 7 U.S.C. 1949(b) limitation on period borrowers were eligible for guaranteed assistance, beginning Jan. 1, 2002, and ending Dec. 31, 2010.
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

About EDOVERVIEW
#### Marshall O. Densby, appellee, v. Frederick H. Bartlett, appellant.

Gen. No. 29,045.

Action to recover damages for injuries sustained through the negligent operation of an automobile by the defendant. Judgment for the plaintiff. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. Lee W. Carrier, Judge, presiding. Heard in the third division of this court for the first district at the October term, 1923.

Affirmed.

Taylor, J., dissenting.

Opinion filed February 11, 1925.

*624Vail, Vail & Plamondon, for appellant.

Vincent G. Gallagher, for appellee.

Sir. Justice Thomson

delivered the opinion of the court.
### §2121. Cotton ginning investigations; publication of results; cooperation with Federal and State departments and agencies

The Secretary of Agriculture is authorized to investigate the ginning of cotton; to establish and maintain experimental ginning plants and laboratories; and to make such tests, demonstrations, and experiments, and such technical and scientific studies in relation to cotton ginning as he shall deem necessary and to publish the results thereof, with a view to developing improved ginning equipment and encouraging the use of improved methods, and he may cooperate with any department or agency of the Government, any State, Territory, District, or possession, or department, agency, or political subdivision thereof, or any person, as he shall find to be necessary.

(Apr. 19, 1930, ch. 203, §1, 46 Stat. 248.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 424 of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

Section was enacted as part of act Apr. 19, 1930, ch. 203, and not as part of the Cotton Research and Promotion Act which comprises this chapter.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>       5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED BALANCE SHEET AND CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENT OF
OPERATIONS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>    1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1994
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                    DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                             887
<SECURITIES>                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                    5,157
<ALLOWANCES>                         0
<INVENTORY>                      7,071
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                13,646
<PP&E>                          16,810
<DEPRECIATION>                  13,062
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  17,394
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>            2,767
<BONDS>                              0
<COMMON>                        13,942
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                0
<PREFERRED>                          0
<OTHER-SE>                         523
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    17,394
<SALES>                         30,660
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                30,660
<CGS>                           19,287
<TOTAL-COSTS>                    8,335
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                  71
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  2,967
<INCOME-TAX>                       181
<INCOME-CONTINUING>              2,786
<DISCONTINUED>                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                      0
<CHANGES>                            0
<NET-INCOME>                     2,786
<EPS-PRIMARY>                      .72
<EPS-DILUTED>                      .72
#### Magaly Ugarriza, Respondent, v Glenn R. Schmieder et al., Appellants.

In a negligence action by a passenger to recover damages for personal injuries sustained in a one-car collision, defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated August 9, 1977, which granted plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and an assessment of damages. Order reversed, on the law, with $50 costs and disbursements and motion denied. The uncontroverted facts permit conflicting inferences which may be resolved only by the trier of the facts. Latham, J. P., Cohalan and O’Connor, JJ., concur; Margett, J., dissents and votes to affirm the order with the following memorandum: Plaintiff was a passenger in a car driven by defendant Glenn R. Schmieder (hereafter referred to as defendant) which collided with a cement divider in a parking lot shortly after 4:00 O’clock on the morning of November 1, 1975. It is undisputed that defendant, plaintiff and two others were enroute from a discotheque to a diner; that defendant initially drove west *on*Jericho Turnpike for four or five miles and went past the diner before turning south into a shopping center parking lot; that once in the parking lot he turned east on a direct course toward the diner; and that he proceeded 150 to 200 feet east before the impact. The defendant further testified, at his examination before trial, that there were no vehicles or other objects in the parking lot which would have obstructed his view; that the cement divider was a foot or higher, about six feet thick, and an off-white ("cement”) color; and that the parking lot itself was blacktopped. The defendant wasn’t sure of the length of the divider, but it was longer than the "length” of his car. Upon impact both the plaintiff and the defendant hit, and broke, the windshield of the car. On the basis of these undisputed facts, summary judgment was properly granted to the plaintiff. It is clear that the defendant driver failed to keep his vehicle under control and failed to keep a proper lookout on the roadway ahead of him. The circumstances and conditions were such that, in the exercise of ordinary prudence, he ought to have seen the divider and was bound to use necessary care to avoid colliding with it (see *Axelrod v Armitstead,*36 AD2d 593). There is nothing to indicate that plaintiff was contributorily negligent; Special Term correctly held that there are no questions of fact which would require a trial on the issue of liability.
NUMBER 13-19-00387-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

IN RE BRANSCOMB P.C., SHANNON WILDE, JAMES ROBICHAUX, 

MICHAEL W. STUKENBERG, JAMES CLANCY, OMAR LEAL, 

KEITH SIECZKOWSKI, JEFFREY S. DICKERSON,

RHONDA JOLLEY, AND GRADY JOLLEY

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

ORDER

Before Justices Benavides, Hinojosa and Perkes

Per Curiam Order

Relators Branscomb P.C., Shannon Wilde, James Robichaux, Michael W. 

Stukenberg, James Clancy, Omar Leal, Keith Sieczkowski, Jeffrey S. Dickerson, Rhonda 

Jolley, and Grady Jolley filed a petition for writ of mandamus and emergency motion for 

temporary relief and stay in the above cause on August 12, 2019. Through this original 

proceeding, relators seek to compel the trial court to vacate its July 30, 2019 discovery 
2

order. By their emergency motion for temporary relief and stay, relators seek to stay all 

trial court proceedings pending resolution of this original proceeding.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the emergency motion for 

temporary relief and stay, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. The motion 

is GRANTED and the trial court proceedings are ordered STAYED pending further order 

of this Court, or until the case is finally decided. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.10(b) (“Unless 

vacated or modified, an order granting temporary relief is effective until the case is finally 

decided.”). The Court requests that the real party in interest, Kenton McDonald, or any 

others whose interest would be directly affected by the relief sought, file a response to 

the petition for writ of mandamus on or before the expiration of ten days from the date of 

this order. See id. R. 52.2, 52.4, 52.8. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the

13th day of August, 2019.
Order entered April 8, 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas** No. 05 - 12 - 00825 - CV CARL BENSON , Appellant V. JPMORGAN CHASE, Appellee and No. 05 - 12 - 00 943 - CV CARL BENSON, Appellant V. EMC MORTGAGE CORPORATION, Appellee On Appeal from the 116th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No s . DC - 10 - 11135 - F and DC - 12 - 0677 

### O RDER Because a review of the clerk’s record s in th e s e appeal s reveals the two appeals are the same, we CONSOLIDATE , on our own mot ion, appellate cause number 05

- 12

- 00943

- CV into
cause 05

- 12

- 000825

- CV . The parties shall now use only cause number 05

- 12

- 00825

- CV when referencing the appeal.We note appellant’s amended brief is overdue. In light of this order, we extend appellant’s t ime for filing his amended brief and ORDER appellant’s brief be filed within thirty days of the date of this order. Appellant is cautioned that failure to comply ma y result in this appeal being dismissed without further notice.

/Elizabeth Lang

- Miers/ ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS JUSTICE
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

March 27, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

130011 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 130011 

 COA: 256061 

Oakland CC: 2003-190459-FH 

KALVIN LAMAR WASHINGTON, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 20, 2005 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

KELLY, J., would hold this case in abeyance for People v Drohan, lv gtd 472 Mich 

881 (2005). 

t0320 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

March 27, 2006 

Clerk
Respondent Burden

average of state submissions

June 2008

Page 1 of 2

123456789

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

ABCDEFGH I JKLMNOPQRSTUV

Information 

Collection Activity

Total Avg.

R3 R4 R5 R6 Avg. R3 R4 R5 R6 Avg. R3 R4 R5 R6 Avg. R3 R4 R5 R6 Avg.

1. Pre-review and Offsite 

metrics

Review elements and 

metrics and prepare data 

discrepency response

00000634 12 6.25 60 30 15 36 35.2500000

Train/brief state staff & 

managers on review 

substance and process

0000026 12 24 118 12 21 40 20.2500000

collect files, policies, data 

sets, reports, etc.

0000000884 20 12 21 24 19.2500000

2. Onsite Review

Participate in multi-media 

kick-off meeting

0003 0.7540083480 24900000

Assist/facilitate EPA 

review of files and data 

sets

00000 300 48 40 29.5 90 64 216 140 127.500000

Participate in discussion of 

program with EPA

000002046388 18 14 1200000

3. Report Review

Review and comment on 

draft report

00000 20 10 32 24 21.5 12 120 72 120 8100000

4. Coordination of Parts 

1, 2 & 3

Coordination of review 

within the state agency

00000 10808 2.8898 240 12 1100000

Coordination of review with 

EPA

0

0000 10308 2.333 24 320 12 1700000

Total hours 0.75 83.47 332.3

0 416

Legal: Manag.: Tech.: Clerical:
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 16

- 4134

_____________________________
L ENARD A NDERSON , Appellant,

v.

S TATE O F F LORIDA , Appellee.

___________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County

. Marianne L. Aho , Judge.

May 18, 2018

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. J AY , W INSOR , and M.K. T HOMAS , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Rick A. Sichta, Susanne K. Sichta, and Joseph Hamrick of t he Sichta Firm LLC, Jacksonville
, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Kaitlin Weiss, Assistant Attorney General
, for Appellee.
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1498 

Supporting the designation of ‘‘National Bourbon Heritage Month’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 24, 2024 

Mr. MCGARVEY (for himself, Mr. BARR, and Mr. COMER) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and 

Accountability 

RESOLUTION 

Supporting the designation of ‘‘National Bourbon Heritage 

Month’’. 

Whereas bourbon is the only spirit distinctive to the United 

States, and Congress declared bourbon as ‘‘America’s 

Native Spirit’’ in 1964; 

Whereas Kentucky is the birthplace of bourbon and the true 

home of America’s only native spirit; 

Whereas Kentucky produces 95 percent of the world’s supply 

of bourbon; 

Whereas Kentucky has 100 licensed distilleries operated by 

84 companies in 42 counties; 

Whereas bourbon contributes over $9 billion and 23,000 jobs 

to Kentucky’s economy every year; 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1498 IH 

Whereas Kentucky distilleries shipped over $500 million of 

products abroad in 2022, most of which was bourbon; 

Whereas bourbon production uses millions of bushels of corn 

and other grains grown by Kentucky farmers; 

Whereas bourbon is synonymous with Kentucky all over the 

world; 

Whereas Kentucky distillers play a critical role in promoting 

responsible consumption of their products and fighting 

against underage use, high-risk drinking, and impaired 

driving; 

Whereas the Kentucky Bourbon Trail is celebrating its 25th 

anniversary this year; and 

Whereas, during the month of September, the Federal Government, States, cities, and towns will celebrate ‘‘National Bourbon Heritage Month’’: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) supports the designation of ‘‘National Bour3 bon Heritage Month’’; 

4 (2) recognizes bourbon as ‘‘America’s Native 

5 Spirit’’ and celebrates its place in American history 

6 and culture; and 

7 (3) recognizes the contributions of the Com8 monwealth of Kentucky to the culture of the United 

9 States. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
### §§377 to 379. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 377, act Mar. 2, 1887, ch. 314, §6, 24 Stat. 441, as amended, was transferred to section 361f of this title. For provisions of section 377 which related to unexpended part of annual appropriations, see section 361g of this title.

Section 378, act Mar. 2, 1887, ch. 314, §8, 24 Stat. 441, as amended, was transferred to section 361h of this title.

Section 379, act Mar. 2, 1887, ch. 314, §7, 24 Stat. 441, as amended, was transferred to section 361g of this title. For provisions of section 379 which provided that the relation of the college to the State was unaffected, see section 361h of this title.
### SUBCHAPTER V—EMERGENCY LIVESTOCK FEED ASSISTANCE ACT OF 1988
12.204 Solicitation/contract form. ( a ) ( 1 ) The contracting officer shall use the Standard Form 1449, Solicitation/Contract/Order for Commercial Products and Commercial Services, if— ( i ) The acquisition is expected to exceed the simplified acquisition threshold;
( ii ) A paper solicitation or contract is being issued; and
( iii ) Procedures at 12.603 are not being used.
( 2 ) Use of the SF 1449 is nonmandatory but encouraged for commercial acquisitions not exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold.
( b ) Consistent with the requirements at 5.203 (a) and (h), the contracting officer may allow fewer than 15 days before issuance of the solicitation.
[62 FR 264, Jan. 2, 1997, as amended at 86 FR 61022, Nov. 4, 2021]
### §2210. Deputy Secretary of Agriculture; appointment

There is established in the Department of Agriculture the position of Deputy Secretary of Agriculture, to be appointed by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate.

(Mar. 26, 1934, ch. 89, title I, 48 Stat. 467; Pub. L. 94–561, §1(c)(1), Oct. 19, 1976, 90 Stat. 2643.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Provisions of this section which prescribed the basic compensation of the Under Secretary were omitted to conform to the provisions of act July 31, 1956. See section 5314 of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.

Section was formerly classified to section 514a of Title 5 prior to the general revision and enactment of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees, by Pub. L. 89–554, §1, Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 378.

#### Amendments

1976—Pub. L. 94–561 substituted "Deputy Secretary of Agriculture" for "Under Secretary of Agriculture".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1976 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 94–561 effective Oct. 19, 1976, see section 5 of Pub. L. 94–561, set out as a note under section 5313 of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.

#### Status of Incumbent Under Secretary of Agriculture

Pub. L. 94–561, §1(d), Oct. 19, 1976, 90 Stat. 2643, provided that: "The officer occupying the position of Under Secretary of Agriculture, on the date of enactment of this Act [Oct. 19, 1976], may assume the duties of the Deputy Secretary of Agriculture. The individual assuming such duties shall not be required to be reappointed by reason of the enactment of this Act."

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

Functions of all officers, agencies, and employees of Department of Agriculture transferred, with certain exceptions, to Secretary of Agriculture by 1953, Reorg. Plan No. 2, §1, eff. June 4, 1953, 18 F.R. 3219, 67 Stat. 633, set out as a note under section 2201 of this title.
§ 536.137 Claims payable under the Foreign Claims Act. ( a ) A claim for death, personal injury, or loss of or damage to property may be allowed under this subpart if the alleged damage results from noncombat activity or a negligent or wrongful act or omission of soldiers or civilian employees of the U.S. armed forces, as enumerated in § 536.23(b), regardless of whether the act or omission was made within the scope of their employment. This includes non-U.S. citizen employees recruited elsewhere but employed in a country of which they are not a citizen. However, a claim generated by non-U.S. citizen employees in the country in which they were recruited and are employed will be payable only if the act or omission was made in the scope of employment. But claims arising from the operation of U.S. armed forces vehicles or other equipment by such employees may be paid, even though the employees are not acting within the scope of their employment, provided the employer or owner of the vehicle or other equipment would be liable under local law in the circumstances involved.
( b ) Claims generated by officers or civilian employees of the American Battle Monuments Commission (36 U.S.C. 2110), acting within the scope of employment, will be paid from American Battle Monuments Commission appropriations.
( c ) Claims for the loss of, or damage to, property that may be settled under this subpart include the following: ( 1 ) Real property used and occupied under lease, express, implied, or otherwise. See § 536.34(m) of this part and paragraph 2-15m of DA Pam 27-162.
( 2 ) Personal property bailed to the government under an agreement, express or implied, unless the owner has expressly assumed the risk of damage or loss.