alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CertificationPursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

asAdopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

 

Inconnection with the quarterly report of Educational Development Corporation(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending May 31, 2009, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),the undersigned certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:  | July 15,  2009 |   | By                                            | /s/  Randall W. White   |
|--------|---------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------|-------------------------|
|   |                |   | Randall  W. White                             |
|   |                |   | President  and Chief Executive Officer        |
|   |                |   |                                          |
| Date:  | July 15,  2009 |   | By                                            | /s/  Marilyn R. Welborn |
|   |                |   | Controller  and Corporate Secretary           |
|   |                |   | (Principal  Financial and Accounting Officer) |

 

----
Exhibit 4.25


 


STATE OF DELAWARE


CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION


 


Crdentia Corp., a corporation organized and existing under and by
virtue of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.


 


DOES HEREBY CERTIFY:


 


1. The name of the corporation is Crdentia Corp.


 


2. That a Certificate of Amendment to Amended and Restated Certificate
of Incorporation of the corporation was filed by the Secretary of State of
Delaware on March 20, 2006 and that said Certificate requires correction as
permitted by Section 103 of the General Corporation Law of the State of
Delaware.


 


3. The inaccuracy or defect of said Certificate to be corrected is as
follows:


 


The combination of the outstanding shares of the Common Stock effected
by said Certificate should be effective as of 5:00 p.m., Eastern Time, on April
3, 2006, not as of 5:00 p.m., Eastern Time, on March 30, 2006.


 


4. Article IV Paragraph (A) of the Certificate is corrected to read as
follows:


 


“(A)  Classes of Stock. This
corporation is authorized to issue two classes, denominated Common Stock and
Preferred Stock. The Common Stock shall have a par value of $0.0001 per share
and the Preferred Stock shall have a par value of $0.0001 per share. The total
number of shares of Common Stock which this corporation is authorized to issue
is one hundred fifty million (150,000,000), and the total number of shares of
Preferred Stock which this corporation is authorized to issue is ten million
(10,000,000). Effective as of 5:00 p.m., Eastern Time, on April 3, 2006, each
ten (10) shares of this corporation’s Common Stock, par value $0.0001 per
share, issued and outstanding shall, automatically and without any action on
the part of the respective holders thereof, be combined and converted into one
(1) share of Common Stock, par value $0.0001 per share, of this corporation. No
fractional shares shall be issued and, in lieu thereof, any holder of less than
one share of Common Stock shall be entitled to receive cash for such holder’s
fractional share based upon the fair market value of the Common Stock as of the
date this Certificate of Amendment is filed with the Secretary of State of the
State of Delaware as determined by this corporation’s Board of Directors.”


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Crdentia Corp. has caused this certificate to be
signed by its Chief Financial Officer as of March 30, 2006.


 


 


	
   

  	
  By:

  	
   /s/ James J. TerBeest

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  James J. TerBeest,

  
	
   

  	
  Chief Financial Officer
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

MEMORANDUM

TO: Deputy Assistant Secretary, Office of Acquisition, Grants, and 

Risk Management, Office of Finance and Operations 

THROUGH: Chief Acquisition Officer

FROM: The Secretary

SUBJECT: Designation as, and Delegation of Authority to, the Senior Procurement Executive 

I. DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY

Under the authority vested in me by section 412 of the Department of Education

Organization Act, 20 U.S.C. § 3472, and in accordance with Section 3 of Public Law 111- 

350 (41 U.S.C. §1702(c)), I hereby designate you as the Department of Education’s Senior

Procurement Executive, and delegate to you, and to anyone serving for you in an acting

capacity or officially performing the functions and duties of your position, the authority to

perform functions dealing with the management direction of the Department’s procurement

system, including implementation of its unique procurement policies, regulations and

standards. 

In carrying out the authority delegated to you, direction will be provided by the Chief

Acquisition Officer.

Unless otherwise noted in future delegations of authority, amendments to the authority

cited herein are included within the scope of this delegation.

II. RESERVATIONS

None. 

III. REDELEGATION

Subject to the requirements of law, you may redelegate any of the authority delegated to

you in this delegation and authorize further redelegation. 
IV. CERTIFICATION AND EFFECTIVE DATE

This delegation is effective upon certification by the Department's Delegations 

Control Officer, and it supersedes delegation EA/EKA/208, certified on November 7, 

2019. I hereby ratify actions within the scope of this delegation taken by you prior to

the date of certification.

 

Miguel Cardona 

OGC Clearance:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 21-0129

_________________

IN THE MATTER OF:

T.R.S.,

 Respondent and Appellant.

O R D E R

_________________

Pursuant to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classified for 

submission on briefs to a five-justice panel of this Court. 

The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to all counsel of record and to the 

Honorable Robert J. Whelan, District Judge.

For the Court,

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 1 2023

03/01/2023

Case Number: DA 21-0129
### §327. Repealed. May 29, 1928, ch. 901, §1(74), 45 Stat. 991

Section, act Aug. 30, 1890, ch. 841, §5, 26 Stat. 419, related to reports by Secretary of the Interior of disbursements and certificates withheld.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration [RTID 0648-XA800]
 AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
 ACTION: Notice; issuance of a permit.
 SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a permit has been issued to the following entity under the Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA).
 ADDRESSES: The permit and related documents are available for review 
                        ( print page 2386)
                        upon written request via email to 
                        *NMFS.Pr1Comments@noaa.gov.*
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sara Young (Permit No. 24356) at (301) 427-8401.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice was published in the 
                    **Federal Register**
                     on the date listed below that a request for a permit had been submitted by the below-named applicant. To locate the 
                    **Federal Register**
                     notice that announced our receipt of the application and a complete description of the activity, go to 
                    *www.federalregister.gov*
                     and search on the permit number provided in Table 1 below. Table 1—Issued Permit
Permit No.
RTID
Applicant
Previous 
                            **Federal**
                             
                                **Register**
                                 Notice
Issuance date24356
0648-XA614
Plimsoll Productions, Whiteladies House, 51-55 Whiteladies Road, Bristol BS8 2LY, United Kingdom (Responsible Party: James Manisty)
85 FR 70130; November 4, 2020
December 18, 2020.
 In compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 
                    *et seq.*), a final determination has been made that the activities proposed are categorically excluded from the requirement to prepare an environmental assessment or environmental impact statement. Authority:
                    The requested permit was issued under the MMPA of 1972, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1361 
                        *et seq.*) and the regulations governing the taking of marine mammals (50 CFR part 216). Dated: January 6, 2021. Julia Marie Harrison, Chief, Permits and Conservation Division, Office of Protected Resources, National Marine Fisheries Service.


[FR Doc. 2021-00352 Filed 1-11-21; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-22-P
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1533 

Reaffirming United States support of the State of Israel one year after 

the October 7, 2023, attacks. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 4, 2024 

Mr. FRY (for himself, Mr. ISSA, Mr. BIGGS, Mrs. HOUCHIN, Mr. DUARTE, 

Mrs. MILLER of West Virginia, Mr. BISHOP of North Carolina, Mr. 

KELLY of Pennsylvania, Mr. MORAN, Mr. BUCHANAN, Mr. GUTHRIE, Mr. 

NUNN of Iowa, Mr. GUEST, Mr. CRENSHAW, and Mr. CARL) submitted 

the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign 

Affairs 

RESOLUTION 

Reaffirming United States support of the State of Israel 

one year after the October 7, 2023, attacks. 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) reaffirms the United States strong and con3 tinued support of Israel one year following the Octo4 ber 7, 2023, surprise attacks on Israel; 

5 (2) condemns Hamas’ brutal war against Israel; 

6 and 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HRES 1533 IH 

1 (3) calls on Hamas to immediately cease these 

2 violent attacks and safely release all living hostages 

3 and return the bodies of deceased hostages. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-82,700-01

EX P ARTE TERRILL MIDDLETON, Appl icant

ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. W10-72351-S(A) IN THE 282 JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT N D F ROM DALLAS COUNTY

Per curiam . O R D E R Pursuant to the provisi o n s o f Ar t icle 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedur e, the cler k of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habea s corpus. Ex parte Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1 9 6 7 ). Applicant was convicted of the offense of ag g rava ted assault with a de adly

wea pon and sente nced to imprisonment for te n y ear s. The Applicant alleg es, among other things, that his plea was involuntary and that he rec eived ineffe ctive assistance of trial and appellate counsel in this case . The State responds to A pplicant’s alleg ations, in pertinent par t: The State contends that trial and appellate counsel for Applicant provided repr esenta tion that fell within the wide rang e of rea sonable assist ance [cite omitted]

. The State, howeve r, rec og nizes that thisCourt may desire additional evidenc e reg arding t rial and appellate counsel’s repr esenta tion of Applicant. I f so, the State reque sts that this Court g ather evidenc e, as is customary , by way of aff idavit from both counsel or hold an evidentiar y hear i n g should the Court deem such to be ne cessa

ry . On J uly 7, 2014, a timely order desig nating issues was signe d by the trial court. The habea s

rec ord was then proper ly forwa rded to this Court pursuant to T E X . R. A P P . P. 73.4 (b)( 5), but without the desig nated issues bein g re s o l v ed by the trial court. We rema nd this application to the 282 1 n d J udicial District Court of Dallas County to allow the trial judge to complete an ev i d en t iary investiga tion and enter

finding s of fa ct and c onclusions of law. This application will be held in abey ance until the trial court has resolved the fac t issues. The issues shall be resolved within 90 day s of this order

. A s u p p l em en t al transcr ipt containing all aff idavits and int err og atories or the t ransc ription of t he court repor ter’s notes from any hear ing or deposition, along with the trial court’ s supplemental finding s of fa ct and c onclusions of law, shall be for war ded to this Court within 120 day s of t he date of t his order. A ny extensions of ti me shall be obtained f

rom this Court.

Filed: Mar ch 04, 2015 Do not publish

Under T E X . R. A P P . P. 73.5, a trial c ourt may reque st an extension of tim e to re solve 1 desig nated issues by

filing a motion before the expiration of 180 day s from the da te of the r ece ipt of the a pplication by

the State.
#### James Kohls, as Executor of Leon W. Kohls, Deceased, Respondent, v. Francis E. O’Neill, Appellant.

Order unanimously reversed, without costs of this appeal to either party and motion granted, without costs. See Memorandum filed in companion case of *O’Neill*v. *Kohls*(12 A D 2d 888). (Appeal from order of Monroe Special Term denying motion by defendant to change the place of trial from Monroe County to Genesee County.) Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Goldman, McClusky and Henry, JJ.
|  | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/ Michael Doar                                                  |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Michael      Doar                                                 |
| Chairman      of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President |
| January      12, 2011                                             |

----
**Exhibit
13**
  CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the Annual Report of Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. (the
"Company") on Form 20-F for the year ended January 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Form 20-F") I David
Wolfin, President (and acting Principal Executive and Financial Officer), of the
Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of our
knowledge and belief:
 
 (1)
    The
      Form 20-F fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78M or 78o(d)); and
 
 (2)
    The
      information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.
 
 
 
 Dated:
August 12,
2005     */s/
David Wolfin* ____________
 David
Wolfin, President
 (Principal Executive and Financial Officer)
 
         59
## Junctio n Cit yWir e l-larnes s Inc
.

>!l( ! ;-£ v•; Septembe r16 , 201 0 

### ^^! i TMyj , 4 ,,^3 3 PD
. Box4 5 1CX3 2 N
. Perr y Junctio n Gcy, Kansa s BB441-004 5 Phone : (785 } 7B2^40 0 Fax : (785 j 7B2-3B3 7 Susa n L
. tCurlan d Assistan t Secretar yfo rAviatio n an d Internationa l Affair s U S Departmen t o fTransportatio n 

### W86-33 4 120 0 Ne wJerse yAve , S E Washington , D C 2059 0 Re : Suppor t o fMonhiottan , Kansas , i n th e Smal l Communit yAi rServic e Developmen t Progra m Gran t Applicatio n Ms
. Kurland ; A s a busines s owne rwh o relie s heavil yo n ai rtrave l t o mak e th e necessar ypersona l connection s t o ou rcustomers , I a m i n ful l suppor t o fth e Manhatta n Regiona l Airport' s applicatio n fo rfundin g unde rth e SCAS D Program
. Thi s gran t woul d allo wou rregiona l airpor t t o expan d th e servic e i t offer s i n suppor t o floca l commerce . Whil e ou rloca l econom yha s bee n somewha t insulate d fro m th e effect s o fth e recen t notiona l recession , i n n o wa yha s I t bee n immun e t o th e overal l impact
. Regiona l je t servic e t o th e ManhoUa n Airpor t ha s playe d a significan t rol e i n creatin g an d stabilizin g ou rjo b marke t an d th e deman d fo rou rproduct s an d service s originatin g fro m withi n ou rregion
. W e hop e tha t throug h th e awar d o fthi s grant , th e continue d growt h o f reliabl e an d convenien t ai rservic e t o critica l destination s wil l furthe renhanc e ou r regiona l econom yb ybuildin g o n th e stron g connection s betwee n nationa l an d internationa l customers
. Than k yo u i n advanc e fo ryou rconsideration
.
Tod d Slisk

i Vice-Presiden t o fOperation s Junctio n Cit yWir e Harnes s
§ 1905.2 Definitions. For the purpose of this part: ( a ) CIA or Agency means the Central Intelligence Agency and includes all staff elements of the Director of Central Intelligence.
( b ) *Demand* means any subpoena, order, or other legal summons (except garnishment orders) that is issued by a federal, state, or local governmental entity of competent jurisdiction with the authority to require a response on a particular matter, or a request for appearance of an individual where a demand could issue.
( c ) *Employee* means any officer, any staff, contract, or other employee of CIA; any person including independent contractors associated with or acting on behalf of CIA; and any person formerly having such a relationship with CIA.
( d ) Production or produce means the disclosure of: ( 1 ) Any material contained in the files of CIA; or
( 2 ) Any information relating to material contained in the files of CIA, including but not limited to summaries of such information or material, or opinions based on such information or material; or
( 3 ) Any information acquired by persons while such persons were employees of CIA as a part of the performance of their official duties or because of their official status or association with CIA; in response to a demand upon an employee of CIA.
( e ) *General Counsel* includes the Deputy General Counsel or Acting General Counsel.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GEORGE E. JACOBS, IV,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

DIRECTOR OF THE CALIFORNIA

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; et

al.,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 11-15269

D.C. No. 1:09-cv-01369-LJOGBC

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

Lawrence J. O’Neill, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 21, 2012** 

Before: FERNANDEZ, McKEOWN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

George E. Jacobs, IV, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se from the

district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that

FILED

MAR 05 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 11-15269

unauthorized deductions from his inmate trust account for payment of his court

filing fees violated his due process rights. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1291. We review de novo, Nelson v. Heiss, 271 F.3d 891, 893 (9th Cir. 2001),

and we affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Jacobs’s action because Jacobs had an

adequate post-deprivation remedy under California law. See Hudson v. Palmer,

468 U.S. 517, 533 (1984) (“[A]n unauthorized intentional deprivation of property

by a state employee does not constitute a violation of the procedural requirements

of the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment if a meaningful

postdeprivation remedy for the loss is available.”); Barnett v. Centoni, 31 F.3d 813,

816-17 (9th Cir. 1994) (per curiam) (“California [l]aw provides an adequate

post-deprivation remedy for any property deprivations.” (citing Cal. Gov’t Code

§§ 810-895)).

Jacobs’s request for judicial notice is denied.

Jacobs’s remaining contentions are unpersuasive.

AFFIRMED.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED MA RCH 29, 2019

NO. 03

- 19

- 00018

- CV

Farida Moeen and Pulin Pandya, Appellant s

v.

Centrix Group, LLC, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 207TH DISTRICT COURT OF HAYS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUS TICE ROSE, JUSTICES KELLY AND SMITH

DISMISSED ON APPELLANTS ’ MOTION

-- OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the tr i a l court on December 4, 2018.

Farida Moeen and Pulin Pandya have filed a motion to dismiss the appeal, and having considered

the motion, the Court agrees that the motion should be granted. Therefore, the Court grants the

motion and dismisses the appeal

. The appellant s shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both

in this Court and in the court below.
§ 775.5 Classified actions. ( a ) The fact that a proposed action is of a classified nature does not relieve the proponent of the action from complying with NEPA and the CEQ regulations. Therefore, environmental documents shall be prepared, safeguarded and disseminated in accordance with the requirements applicable to classified information. When feasible, these documents shall be organized in such a manner that classified portions are included as appendices so that unclassified portions can be made available to the public. Review of classified NEPA documentation will be coordinated with the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to fulfill requirements of section 309 of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7609 *et seq.*).
( b ) It should be noted that a classified EA/EIS serves the same “informed decisionmaking” purpose as does a published unclassified EA/EIS. Even though the classified EA/EIS does not undergo general public review and comment, it must still be part of the information package to be considered by the decisionmaker for the proposed action. The content of a classified EA/EIS (or the classified portion of a public EA/EIS) will therefore meet the same content requirements applicable to a published unclassified EA/EIS.