alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION**

TO:JoAnn Ryan, Executive Officer

Brenda Long, Administrative Officer

Office of the Secretary

FROM:The Assistant Secretary

 Office of Planning, Evaluation, and Policy Development

SUBJECT: Delegation of Authority to Certify Fund Availability

I.DELEGATION

Under the authority vested in me by a delegation from the Secretary delegating administrative authorities as delegated to all Principal Officers, EA/ED/2,  certified on November 17, 2005, I hereby delegate to you, and to anyone serving for you in an acting capacity, the authority to certify funds available for administering the functions and responsibilities of the Office of Planning, Evaluation, and Policy Development.  This authority is issued pursuant to Title 31 of the U.S. Code, which governs the money and finances of the Department.

Unless otherwise noted in future delegations of authority, amendments to the authority delegated herein are included in the scope of this delegation.

II.RESERVATIONS:  None.

III. REDELEGATION

This authority may not be redelegated

IV.CERTIFICATION AND EFFECTIVE DATE

This delegation is effective upon certification by the Department's Principal Delegations Control Officer and supersedes all previous delegation of this authority.  I hereby ratify actions within the scope of this delegation taken by you prior to the date of certification.

_________/s/_____________ 

            Tom Luce

OGC Clearance and Date:  /s/ David Berthiaume, 4/13/2006

Certified Date:  4/20/2006

Departmental Delegations Control Officer:  /s/ Naty G. Beetle

Control Number:  ED/EA1/156
#### Great Western Smelting & Refining Company, appellee, v. O’Malley-Beare Valve Company, appellant.

Gen. No. 29,598.

Action for breach of contract. Judgment for plaintiff. Appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Robert E. Gentzel, Judge, presiding. Heard in the first division of this court for the first district at the October term, 1924. *Certiorari*denied by Supreme Court (making opinion final).

Affirmed.

Opinion filed May 11, 1925.

Rehearing denied May 25, 1925.

Wegg & Wegg, Ernest A. Baughman and Benjamin Wham, for appellant.

Eastman, White & Hawxhurst, for appellee; Homer C. Dawson, of counsel.

Mr. Justice Johnston

delivered the opinion of the court.
###### Editorial Note on Part 724

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 724 appear at 65 FR 62616, Oct. 19, 2000.

#### § 724.102 Naval Discharge Review Board.

An administrative board, referred to as the “NDRB” established by the Secretary of the Navy pursuant to title 10 U.S.C., section 1553, for the review of discharges of former members of the Naval Service.
Meeting Summary:

 On March 26, 2014, Miles McEvoy (NOP Deputy Administrator) and Melissa Bailey (NOP 

Standards Division Director) had a phone call with Mr. Drew Norman of One Straw Farm. 

 Mr. Norman inquired about whether his farm could be certified organic before the final rule 

(NOP-13-01) addressing biodegradable biobased mulch films is published. In particular, he 

inquired whether stopping use of Biodegradable Mulch until it is allowed by this rulemaking 

action would affect his ability to receive organic certification. 

 Mr. McEvoy reiterated that this type of mulch is not currently allowed and advised Mr. Norman 

to hold off submitting his certification application until the final rule is published. Mr. McEvoy 

explained that after a final rule is published a certifying agent would need to review any his 

current use of this mulch to determine whether it complies with any allowance on National List. 

Mr. McEvoy advised that, as long as the materials used comply with the National List when 

certifying agent considers the application, the operation could be eligible for organic 

certification at that time.
#### Eleanor B. Nelson, complainant, v. Herman Urban, trading as Manor Maintenance Company et al., defendants, on appeal of Standard Sanitary Manufacturers Company, appellant-defendant, v. Miller Plumbing & Heating Supply Company, appellee-defendant.

Gen. No. 29,539.

Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Oscar Hebei, Judge, presiding. Heard in the first division of this court for the first district at the October term, 1924.

Affirmed on opinion in *Nelson v. Urban,*236 Ill. App. 447.

Opinion filed April 13, 1925.

Samuel J. Moran, for appellant.

Benson, Fitch & Heinemann, for appellee Eleanor B. Nelson.

Mr. Justice Matchett

delivered the opinion of the court.
MEMORANDUM

TO: Principal Officers

FROM: The Secretary

SUBJECT: Delegation of Authority

I. DELEGATION

Under the authority vested in me by section 412 of the Department of Education 

Organization Act (DEOA) (Public Law 96-88), 20 U.S.C. 3472, I hereby delegate to 

you for employees in your Principal Office the authority described in 34 C.F.R. Part 

8 regarding demands issued to Departmental employees for testifying or records in 

legal proceedings. This authority only applies to legal proceedings in which the 

United States is not a party.

Unless otherwise noted in future delegations of authority, amendments to the 

existing authorities delegated herein are included within the scope of this delegation.

II. RESERVATION

The authority should be exercised in consultation with the Office of the General 

Counsel.

III. REDELEGATION

This authority may be redelegated to Senior officials in your office who report 

directly to you. No other redelegation is permitted.

IV. CERTIFICATION AND EFFECTIVE DATE

This delegation is effective upon certification by the Department’s Principal 

Delegations Control Officer and supersedes all previous delegations of this 

authority.

_______/s/___________

 Richard W. Riley
Page 2 – Delegation of Authority

OGC Clearance and Date: /s/ R. Wexler, 9/2/92

Certified Date: 9/4/92

Control No. EA/EG/54

Certified by: /s/ Wilma J. Hodo______________

 Departmental Delegations Control Officer

Addressees:

Principal Officers and List and PO Control No.

EA/EB/132 – Deputy Secretary

EA/EC/150 – Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights

EA/EE/3 – Assistant Secretary for Policy and Planning

EA/EF/58 – Inspector General

EA/EG/54 – General Counsel

EA/EH/61 – Assistant Secretary for Special Education and Rehabilitative Services

EA/EJ/22 - Assistant Secretary for Legislation and Congressional Affairs

EA/EK/75 - Assistant Secretary for Intergovernmental and Interagency Affairs

EA/EL/43 – Assistant Secretary for Management and Budget/CFO

EA/EM/180 – Assistant Secretary for Human Resources and Administration

EA/EP/183 - Assistant Secretary for Postsecondary Education

EA/ES/42 - Assistant Secretary for Elementary and Secondary Education

EA/ET/34 - Director, OBEMLA

EA/EV/40 - Assistant Secretary for Vocational and Adult Education

EA/EI/2 – Chief Information Officer

EA/EN/2 – Chief Operating Officer, FSA

EA/EQ/2 – Deputy Under Secretary for Safe and Drug-Free Schools

EA/ER/1 – Director, Institute of Education Sciences

EA/EU/2 – Deputy Under Secretary for Innovation and Improvement
THE SECRETARY OF EDUCATION

WASHINGTON, DC 20202

TO: Executive Director, National Assessment Governing Board 

FROM: The Secretary

SUBJECT: Authority to Designate a Department Employee to Serve as the Designated Federal 

Officer for the National Assessment Governing Board

I. DELEGATION

By the authority vested in me by Section 412 of the Department of Education Organization Act, 20 

U.S.C. § 3472, I hereby delegate to you, or anyone serving for you in an acting capacity or 

delegated to perform the functions and duties of your position, the authority to designate a 

Department employee to serve as and carry out the duties of the Designated Federal Officer (DFO) 

for the National Assessment Governing Board (NAGB), as set forth in 41 C.F.R. §§ 102-3.25 

(definition of the term “Designated Federal Officer”), 102-3.105(i), and 102-3.120 and Sections 

1009(e) and (f) of 5 U.S.C. Chapter 10 (Federal Advisory Committees).

Unless otherwise noted in future delegations of authority, amendments to the existing authorities 

delegated herein are included within the scope of this delegation. 

II. RESERVATIONS

Unless otherwise noted in existing or future delegations of authority, the following is not 

delegated: 

The authority to appoint NAGB members.

III. REDELEGATION

Subject to the requirements of law, you may redelegate any of the authority delegated to you in 

this delegation and authorize further redelegation. Any redelegation must be done in accordance 

with the Administrative Communications System directive, ACSD-OFO-015, Delegation of 

Authority, dated August 26, 2016. 

IV. CERTIFICATION AND EFFECTIVE DATE 

This delegation is effective upon certification by the Department's Principal Delegations Control 

Officer. I ratify actions within the scope of this delegation taken by you prior to the date of 

certification.

____________/s__________ 

Miguel A. Cardona, Ed.D. 
OGC Clearance: /s/ Lauren Friedrich, 02/08/2023

Certified Date: 2/15/2023

Delegations Control Officer: Jim Clemmens

Control Number: EA/EZ/15
### §215. Failure to obey orders; punishment

(a) Any stockyard owner, market agency, or dealer who knowingly fails to obey any order made under the provisions of sections 211, 212, or 213 of this title shall forfeit to the United States the sum of $500 for each offense. Each distinct violation shall be a separate offense, and in case of a continuing violation each day shall be deemed a separate offense. Such forfeiture shall be recoverable in a civil suit in the name of the United States.

(b) It shall be the duty of the various United States attorneys, under the direction of the Attorney General, to prosecute for the recovery of forfeitures. The costs and expense of such prosecution shall be paid out of the appropriation for the expenses of the courts of the United States.

(Aug. 15, 1921, ch. 64, title III, §314, 42 Stat. 167; June 25, 1948, ch. 646, §1, 62 Stat. 909.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Act June 25, 1948, eff. Sept. 1, 1948, substituted "United States attorneys" for "district attorneys" in subsec. (a). See section 541 of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure, and Historical and Revision Notes thereunder.
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 4 (Thursday, January 7, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 1121]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-29310]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: January 7, 2021.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
December 28, 2020, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Contract 686 to Competitive Product 
List. Documents are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2021-58, 
CP2021-60.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2020-29310 Filed 1-6-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
### §138i. Effect of other laws

Nothing in this chapter shall alter the authority of the Secretary of Health and Human Services under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 301 et seq.).

(Pub. L. 101–624, title XIII, §1330, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 3565.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, referred to in text, is act June 25, 1938, ch. 675, 52 Stat. 1040, which is classified generally to chapter 9 (§301 et seq.) of Title 21, Food and Drugs. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 301 of Title 21 and Tables.
### §1472. Assistance for livestock producers

#### (a) Definition of livestock

In this section, the term "livestock" includes elk, reindeer, bison, horses, and deer.

#### (b) Availability of assistance

In such amounts as are provided in advance in appropriation Acts, the Secretary of Agriculture may provide assistance to dairy and other livestock producers to cover economic losses incurred by such producers in connection with the production of livestock.

#### (c) Types of assistance

The assistance provided to livestock producers may be in the following forms:

(1) Indemnity payments to livestock producers who incur livestock mortality losses.

(2) Livestock feed assistance to livestock producers affected by shortages of feed.

(3) Compensation for sudden increases in production costs.

(4) Such other assistance, and for such other economic losses, as the Secretary considers appropriate.

#### (d) Limitations

The Secretary may not use the funds of the Commodity Credit Corporation to provide assistance under this section.

#### (e) Authorization of appropriations

There is authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary such sums as may be necessary to carry out this section.

(Pub. L. 107–171, title X, §10104, May 13, 2002, 116 Stat. 488; Pub. L. 108–447, div. A, title VII, §785(b)(2), Dec. 8, 2004, 118 Stat. 2850; Pub. L. 109–97, title VII, §784(b)(3), Nov. 10, 2005, 119 Stat. 2162.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002, and not as part of the Emergency Livestock Feed Assistance Act of 1988 which comprises this subchapter or as part of the Agricultural Act of 1949 which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of the 1949 Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1421 of this title and Tables.

#### Amendments

2005—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 109–97 substituted "bison, horses, and deer" for "and bison".

2004—Pub. L. 108–447 added subsec. (a) and redesignated former subsecs. (a) to (d) as (b) to (e), respectively.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2005 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 109–97 applicable to losses resulting from a disaster that occurs on or after July 28, 2005, and inapplicable to losses resulting from a disaster that occurs before such date, see section 784(c) of Pub. L. 109–97, set out as a note under section 1471 of this title.
#### CAROL S. KELLY v. FOOD LION, INC.

No. 469A97

(Filed 6 March 1998)

Appeal by defendant pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from an unpublished decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 127 N.C. App. 395, 490 S.E.2d 254 (1997), reversing the superior court’s order entered by Spencer, J., on 29 July 1996, in Superior Court, Alamance County, granting summary judgment in favor of defendant. Heard in the Supreme Court 12 February 1998.

*David I. Smith for plaintiff-appellee.*

*Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice, RL.L.C., by Robert S. Pierce, for defendant-appellant.*

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


The Board of Directors
American Casino Enterprises, Inc.


We consent to incorporation by reference in registration statement No. 33-51340
on Form S-8 (and Amendment No. 1 thereto) and in registration statement No.
333-00905 on Form S-8 of American Casino Enterprises, Inc. of our report dated
October 9, 1996, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of American Casino
Enterprises, Inc. and subsidiaries as of July 31, 1996 and 1995, and the 
related consolidated statements of income, changes in shareholders' equity, and
cash flows for the years then ended, which report appears in the July 31, 1996 
annual report on Form 10-KSB of American Casino Enterprises, Inc.


Bradshaw, Smith & Co.

Las Vegas, Nevada
October 25, 1996
Exhibit 99.1


                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection with the Quarterly Report of Ennis Business Forms,
Inc.  (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending May  31,
2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on  the
date  hereof (the "Report"), I, Keith S. Walters, Chief Executive
Officer  of  the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.1350,  as
adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

  (1) The  Report fully complies with the requirements of section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

  (2) The  information contained in the Report  fairly  presents,
      in  all  material  respects, the  financial  condition  and
      result of operations of the Company.



/s/ Keith S. Walters

Keith S. Walters
Chief Executive Officer
June 27, 2003






















<PAGE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6769
DONALD LLOYD, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus D. SMITH-HARRIS, Corporal; ANGELA PICKNEY RUIZ, Hearing Officer; JOHN I. NICHOLS, Inmates' Representative; EDSELL T. TAYLOR, Warden of MacDougall Correctional Institution and the Department of Corrections, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Falcon B. Hawkins, Chief District Judge. (CA-95-3255-6-1AK) Submitted: July 23, 1996 Decided: August 6, 1996 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Donald Lloyd, Appellant Pro Se. Henry Dargan McMaster, TOMKINS & MCMASTER, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly,we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Lloyd v. SmithHarris , No. CA-95-3255-6-1AK (D.S.C. Apr. 18, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### § 937.827 Special performance standards—coal processing plants and support facilities not located at or near the minesite or not within the permit area for a mine.

Part 827 of this chapter, *Special Permanent Program Performance Standards—Coal Processing plants and Support Facilities Not Located at or Near the Minesite or Not Within the Permit Area for a Mine,* shall apply to any person who conducts surface coal mining and reclamation operations which include the operation of coal processing plants and support facilities not located at or near the minesite or not within the permit area for a mine.
#### 1001.104 Applicability.

The DTAR applies to all acquisitions of supplies and services, which obligate appropriated funds. For acquisitions made from non-appropriated funds, the Senior Procurement Executive will determine the rules and procedures that will apply. The DTAR does not apply to the acquisitions of the U.S. Mint.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 1 9 - 0 632 STATE OF MONTANA ,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. GREGORY M. SMITH ,

Defendant and Appellant.

**GRANT OF EXTENSION** Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 30 - day extension of time, and good cause appearing therefor, Appellee is gran ted an extension of time to and including August 2 , 2020 , within which to prepare, serve, and file its response brief.

**M P**  **D** Electronically signed by: Bowen Greenwood Clerk of the Supreme Court July 1 2020

07/01/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0632
---

# UNITED STATES
  SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION 
  WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549



---

# FORM 8-K

# CURRENT REPORT

---

Pursuant
  to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

March
  29, 2004 (Date of earliest event reported)

---

THE
  DIAL CORPORATION(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

---



|Delaware
        (State of Incorporation) | 51-0374887
        (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
|----------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------



15501
  North Dial Boulevard
  Scottsdale, Arizona 85260-1619(Address of principal executive offices)

(480) 754-3425(Registrants telephone number, including area code)

---

---

Item 5. Other
  Events and Required FD Disclosure.



Henkel Merger Corporation,
  a wholly-owned subsidiary of Henkel KGaA (Henkel), closed its merger
  with The Dial Corporation (Dial) on March 29, 2004, completing Henkels
  acquisition of Dial. A copy of the press release issued on March 29, 2004 announcing
  the closing of Henkels acquisition of Dial is attached hereto as Exhibit
  99.1and is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 7.    Financial
  Statements, Pro Forma Financial Information and Exhibits.

|Exhibit
      No. | Description                                              
|----------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------
|99.1              | Press
      release of Henkel KGaA, dated March 29, 2004.



---

# SIGNATURES



Pursuant
  to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the
  registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned
  hereunto duly authorized.

|                      | THE DIAL
      CORPORATION                                                                                                                                                   
|--------------------- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                      |                                                                                                                                                                              
|Dated: March 29, 2004 | By: /s/
        Conrad A. Conrad
                Name: Conrad A. Conrad
        
                Title:   Executive
        Vice Presidentand
        Chief Financial Officer

---

# INDEX TO EXHIBITS

|Exhibit
      No. | Description                                              
|----------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------
|99.1              | Press
      release of Henkel KGaA, dated March 29, 2004.