alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ENCLOSURE 3

RECORD OF HEARING AND SUMMARY OF TESTIMONY

As required by 40 CFR 51.102(e), the complete record of the hearing, along with a list 

of witnesses and the text of the written presentations or summary of the oral 

presentations, is located at the Office of Air Regulatory Development of the Department 

of Environmental Quality. The Department contact to access this information is the 

Director, Office of Air Regulatory Development.

As required by Section 2.1(h) of Appendix V of 40 CFR Part 51, below is a summary of 

the testimony received and responses thereto. Included is a brief statement of the 

subject, the identification of the commenter, the summary of the comment and the 

response (analysis and action taken). Each issue is discussed in light of all of the 

comments received that affect that issue. All comments have been reviewed and 

responses developed based on an evaluation of the issues raised in consideration of 

the overall goals and objectives of the air quality program and the intended purpose of 

the document under review.

1. SUBJECT: Sulfur dioxide reductions

COMMENTER: USDA Forest Service

TEXT: The commenter reviewed the permit conditions and agrees with 

the department's recommendations. The sulfur dioxide emissions 

reductions, especially those from adding a scrubber to Boiler 4, will make 

a big difference at nearby James River Face Wilderness. Not only will 

visibility improve, but sulfur deposition will be reduced.

RESPONSE: Support for the proposal is appreciated.

TEMPLATES\SOURCE-SPECIFIC\PLN03

SRCESPEC\G-P BIG ISLAND\GPBI-SIP-3.DOC
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Shelter
Propertis I 1995 10-KSB and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
10-KSB.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000316220
<NAME> SHELTER PROPERTIES I
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                         529,053
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,612
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                      19,008,246
<DEPRECIATION>                              12,321,615
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,501,220
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                      9,359,041
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,415,001)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,501,220
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,604,515
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,362,306
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             960,193
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   242,209
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    15.99
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>The Partnership has an unclassifed balance sheet.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT
      32.A









**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED
      PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**


**OF
      THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with
      the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending September30, 2007, of El Paso
      Natural Gas Company (the “Company”) as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James J. Cleary, President,
      certify (i) that the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (ii)
      that
      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.











*/s/
              JAMES J. CLEARY*James
                J.
                ClearyPresident(Principal
                Executive Officer)November 6,
                2007
EXHIBIT 32.1
            Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to
           18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
                        of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with this quarterly report of Espey Mfg. & Electronics  Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "report"),  I, Howard
Pinsley, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to  18  U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

         1.       The report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       The information  contained in this report fairly presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

Date: February 12, 2009


                                                /s/Howard Pinsley
                                                -----------------------
                                                Howard Pinsley
                                                President and
                                                Chief Executive Officer

                                       17
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4493-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2020-0001]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (FEMA-4493-DR), dated March 27, 2020, and related determinations.

# DATES:

This change occurred on December 13, 2020.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dean Webster, Office of Response and Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) hereby gives notice that pursuant to the authority vested in the Administrator, under Executive Order 12148, as amended, David Maurstad, of FEMA is appointed to act as the Federal Coordinating Officer for this disaster.

This action terminates the appointment of Thomas Von Essen as Federal Coordinating Officer for this disaster.
      ( print page 555)    
The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Pete Gaynor,

                        Administrator,                         *Federal Emergency Management Agency.*

[FR Doc. 2020-29296 Filed 1-5-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
From: Thomas Finseth

To: Jordan, Ronald; Craig, Nathan D; joseph.potts@duke-energy.com

Cc: Stenger, Jennifer A; Kennedy, William; Delis, Brandon; Schroeder, Cuc; Flanders, Phillip; Dan-Tam Nguyen

Subject: RE: Topics for EPA-Duke Energy call about Miami Fort FGD data

Date: Thursday, May 15, 2014 1:13:03 PM

Attachments: Non-CBI_Miami Fort SER_Final.pdf

Joe/Nathan,

In follow up to the discussion this morning, attached please find a copy of the Non-CBI Miami Fort

Sampling Episode Report.  Page 3-4 of the report identifies which generating units were sampled

during the EPA sampling conducted July 12-16, 2010.  The specific language is included below.

The samples of the influent to the FGD wastewater treatment system that were collected

represent the FGD scrubber purge from the specific unit that was purging at the time the

samples

were collected. The following identifies which units are represented by each day of sampling:

Day 1 – Unit 8;

Day 2 – Unit 7;

Day 3 – Unit 8; and

Day 4 – Unit 7.

Please let me know if you have any additional questions.

TJ Finseth

ERG

14555 Avion Parkway, Suite 200

Chantilly, VA 20151

(703) 633-1698 (phone)

(703) 263-7479 (fax)

thomas.finseth@erg.com

From: Jordan, Ronald [mailto:Jordan.Ronald@epa.gov] 

Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2014 2:32 PM

To: Craig, Nathan D

Cc: Stenger, Jennifer A; Kennedy, William; Delis, Brandon; Schroeder, Cuc; Flanders, Phillip; Thomas

Finseth; Dan-Tam Nguyen; Yan Zhuang

Subject: Topics for EPA-Duke Energy call about Miami Fort FGD data

Nathan,

Please see the attached file containing topics we’d like to discuss during our call next Thursday. 

Please let me know if you have any questions or need clarification in advance of the call.

Regards,

Ron
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Esterline Technologies Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-Q), I, Robert W. Cremin,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)     The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)     The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.



|                         |  |  |  |     |  |                                     
|------------------------ |  |  |  | --- |  | ------------------------------------
|Dated: September 4, 2009 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Robert W. Cremin                
|                         |  |  |  |     |  | Robert W. Cremin                    
|                         |  |  |  |     |  | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
H. Res. 1492 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

September 24, 2024. 

Resolved, That the following named Member be, and is 

hereby, elected to the following standing committees of the 

House of Representatives: 

COMMITTEE ON HOMELAND SECURITY: Mrs. McIver (to 

rank immediately after Mr. Kennedy). 

COMMITTEE ON SMALL BUSINESS: Mrs. McIver. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.73

                              CKE RESTAURANTS, INC.

                                 AMENDMENT NO. 1
                                       TO
                              EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

      This Amendment No. 1 (the "Amendment") to Employment Agreement is made
effective as of December 6, 2005, by and between CKE Restaurants, Inc. (the
"Company") and Theodore Abajian (the "Employee").

                                R E C I T A L S:

      A. The Company and the Employee entered into an Employment Agreement,
dated as of January 2004, as amended on February 1, 2005 (the "Agreement").

      B. The Company and Employee now desire to amend the Agreement as set forth
below.


                                    AGREEMENT

      1. Salary. Effective January 1, 2006, the minimum base annual salary shall
be $375,000.

      2. Term. Section 2 of the Agreement shall read in its entirety as follows:

            "2. Term. The term of this Agreement (the "Term") shall commence on
      the Effective Date and, subject to prior termination as set forth in
      Section 7 below, shall terminate three (3) years following the date on
      which notice of non-renewal or termination of this Agreement is given by
      either party to the other. Thus, the Term shall be renewed automatically
      on a daily basis so that the outstanding Term is always three (3) years
      following the date on which notice of non-renewal or termination is given
      by either party to the other. The Term may be extended at any time upon
      mutual written agreement of the parties."

      3. Definitions. Terms used but not defined in this Amendment shall have
the respective meanings assigned to them in the Agreement.

      4. Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed in multiple counterparts,
each of which shall be deemed an original, and all of which shall constitute one
Amendment.

      5. Terms and Conditions of Agreement. Except as specifically amended by
this Amendment, all terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full
force and effect.


                            [SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS]
<PAGE>
      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment is executed by the undersigned as of
the date first written above.

                                /s/ THEODORE ABAJIAN

                                ------------------------------------------------
                                Theodore Abajian

                                CKE Restaurants, Inc.

                                       /s/ PETER CHURM
                                By:
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Peter Churm
                                       Director and Chairman of the Compensation
                                       Committee of the Board of Directors

                                       2
Opinion issued October 18, 2012.

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-12-00685-CV

———————————

IN RE LANE-VALENTE INDUSTRIES (NATIONAL), INC., Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

By petition for writ of mandamus, relator, Lane-Valente Industries, 

challenges the trial court’s June 21, 2012 order denying its motion to rescind and 

replace the trial court’s April 27, 2012 order to enforce the parties’ settlement 

agreement.1 

 

1

The underlying case is Bovis Lend Lease, Inc. v. Lane-Valente Industries 

(National), Inc., Cause No. 2010-62701; In the 164th District Court of Harris 

County, The Honorable Alexandra Smoots-Hogan, presiding.
2

We deny the petition for writ of mandamus. 

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Bland, Massengale and Brown.
Fourth Department,

September, 1960

(September 15, 1960)

#### County of Erie, Respondent, v. Lafayette Hotel Company et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

Application by County of Erie to advance the return day of motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals from September 13, 1960 to July 12, 1960, granted. Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied, without costs. Application for a stay denied. (Order entered July 12, 1960.) Present — Bastow, J. P., Halpern, McClusky and Henry, JJ.
### Part C—Sustainable Agriculture Technology Development and Transfer Program
<PAGE>
Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of the Erie Family Life Insurance
Company (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Jeffrey A. Ludrof, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.

/s/ Jeffrey A. Ludrof
-----------------------
Jeffrey A. Ludrof
Chief Executive Officer

November 6, 2002
#### COLDWELL BANKER ALAMANCE REALTY v. HUFFMAN

No. 226P97

Case below: 125 N.C.App. 742

Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 4 September 1997.
### §§1506a, 1506b. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 1506a, act July 30, 1947, ch. 356, title II, §202, 61 Stat. 550, which related to authority of Federal Crop Insurance Corporation to make expenditures, was from the Department of Agriculture Appropriation Act, 1948, and was not repeated in subsequent appropriation acts.

Section 1506b, acts June 29, 1954, ch. 409, title II, §201, 68 Stat. 317; May 23, 1955, ch. 43, title II, §201, 69 Stat. 60; June 4, 1956, ch. 355, title II, §201, 70 Stat. 238, which provided that crop inspection costs and loss adjustments could be considered as nonadministrative or nonoperating expenses, was from the Department of Agriculture and Farm Credit Administration Appropriation Acts for fiscal years 1955–57, and was not repeated in subsequent appropriation acts.
§ 770.27 Background. ( a ) Naval installations in Hawaii constitute a significant element of the national defense establishment. It is vital to the national defense that the use of such areas be at all times under the positive control of the Department of the Navy. Strict control must be exercised over access to naval installations in order to preclude damage accidental and intentional to Government property, injury to military personnel, and interference in the orderly accomplishment of the mission of command.
( b ) There are several industrial areas within naval installations in Hawaii wherein construction activities and the use of heavy machinery pose grave risk of danger to visitors.
( c ) Various types of flammable or incendiary materials and ordnance are stored at a number of locations within naval installations in Hawaii.
( d ) Classified documents and equipment requiring protection from unauthorized disclosure by Executive order 12065 for reasons of national security are located at various locations within naval installations in Hawaii.
( e ) In order to effect the positive control of the Navy over its installations in Hawaii, it is essential that entry onto those installations be restricted to authorized persons only.
( f ) These entry regulations are being promulgated under the authority of Commander, Naval Base, Pearl Harbor, who has been assigned as immediate area coordinator for all naval installations in the State of Hawaii by Commander-in-Chief, U.S. Pacific Fleet.
**Exhibit 31.1**
**302 CERTIFICATION**
I, Herman M. Frietsch, certify that:
(1) I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of TeraForce TechnologyCorporation; (2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; (3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; (4) The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have:
 (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, asof the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter inthe case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
(5) The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reporting whichare reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.
Date: March 30, 2004     /s/ HERMAN M. FRIETSCH   Herman M. Frietsch Chief Executive Officer