alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                    <C> 
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                  9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        DEC-31-1998            DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                           JUL-01-1998            JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                             SEP-30-1998            SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                        14,520                 14,520
<SECURITIES>                                       0                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 32,137                 32,137
<ALLOWANCES>                                     613                    613
<INVENTORY>                                   13,435                 13,435
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              62,799                 62,799
<PP&E>                                        25,132                 25,132
<DEPRECIATION>                                10,920                 10,920
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               112,045                112,045
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         38,245                 38,245
<BONDS>                                       85,194                 85,194
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         13,919<F2>             13,919<F2>
<PREFERRED>                                        0                      0
<COMMON>                                    (30,753)               (30,753)
<OTHER-SE>                                         0                      0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 112,045                112,045
<SALES>                                       42,740                119,174
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              42,740                119,174
<CGS>                                         33,244                 91,902
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 33,244                 91,902
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   0                      0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  22                     95
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             2,071                  6,111
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1,018                  2,435
<INCOME-TAX>                                     387                    915
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              631                  1,520
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0                      0
<CHANGES>                                          0                      0 
<NET-INCOME>                                     631                  1,520
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      0<F1>                  0<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      0<F1>                  0<F1>
<FN>

<F1> Earnings per share is not calculated in accordance with FAS No. 128.

<F2> Preferred stock-mandatory includes preferred stock units.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Stephen F. Smith, Chief Financial Officer of EXCO Resources, Inc.
certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 3 on Form 10-K/A to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of EXCO Resources, Inc.; and
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |  |  |  |  |                      |  |                        
|----------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | -------------------- |  | -----------------------
|                        |  |  | 
|Date: February 22, 2011 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ STEPHEN F. SMITH
|                        |  |  |  |  |  |                      |  | Stephen F. Smith       
|                        |  |  |  |  |  |                      |  | Chief Financial Officer
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 02-40273

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ALLISON NOEL BOWEN,

also known as Allison Noel Jenkins,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. B-01-CR-488-ALL

--------------------

December 12, 2002

Before JOLLY, JONES, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Allison Noel Bowen appeals the 46-month sentence imposed

following his guilty plea to a charge of illegal re-entry after

having been deported following an aggravated felony conviction in

violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Bowen argues that the sentencing

provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1) and (b)(2) are

unconstitutional in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466

(2000). He concedes that this argument is foreclosed by
No. 02-40273

-2-

Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224 (1998), but he

seeks to preserve the issue for Supreme Court review. Apprendi

did not overrule Almendarez-Torres. See Apprendi, 530 U.S. at

489-90; United States v. Dabeit, 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir.

2000), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1202 (2001). This court must

follow the precedent set in Almendarez-Torres "unless and until

the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule it." Dabeit, 231

F.3d at 984 (internal quotation and citation omitted). 

 AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of UQM Technologies,Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the annual period ended March31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the "Report"), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and 2) the information contained in thereport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in theReport.

| /s/  William G. Rankin 
William G. Rankin 
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
/s/  Donald A. French 
Donald A. French 
Treasurer, Secretary and Chief Financial Officer
Date:  March 10, 2009

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Proposed Organization Structure (Attachment B)

Office of Career, Technical and Adult Education

Office of Career, Technical, and Adult 

Education

EV

EV1 Executive Office

(Reports to DAS for Management and Planning)

EV2

Policy, Research & Evaluation Staff

Community Colleges, Correctional Education, 

Management & Communications Staff

(Reports to DAS for Management and Planning)

Division of Adult 

Education & Literacy 

EVA Division of Academic & 

Technical Education 

EVH

Accountability Branch

EVA4 College and Career 

Transition Branch

EVH5

Monitoring and 

Administration Branch

EVA5 Program Administration & 

Accountability Branch

Innovation and 

Improvement Branch
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 31.1


                                 CERTIFICATIONS


I, Alfred G. Hansen, certify that:

1.       I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of EMS
Technologies, Inc.;

2.       Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.       Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant
as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.       The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

         a)       designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

         b)       evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

         c)       disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting; and

5.       The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

         a)       all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

         b)       any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting.


By:  /s/ Alfred G. Hansen                                         Date: 8/12/03
     -------------------------------------
     Alfred G. Hansen
     President and Chief Executive Officer
     (Principal Executive Officer)
EXHIBIT 32.B

















CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002










In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2011, of El Paso Natural Gas Company (the “Company”) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John R. Sult, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, certify (i) that the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (ii) that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.










/s/ John R. SultJohn R. SultExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)El Paso Natural Gas CompanyMay 6, 2011




























A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to El Paso Natural Gas Company and will be retained by El Paso Natural Gas Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA 

JAQUAN GAMBOA, 

Petitioner, 

vs. 

THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT 

COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, 

IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF 

CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE 

ERIKA D. BALLOU, DISTRICT JUDGE, 

Respondents, 

and 

THE STATE OF NEVADA, 

Real Party in Interest. 

No. 84139 

FILE 

ORDER DENYING PETITION 

This petition for a writ of mandamus seeks an order directing 

the district court to set reasonable bail. We conclude that extraordinary 

relief is not warranted because petitioner has not met his substantial 

burden of demonstrating a clear legal right to the relief requested. NRS 

34.160; Walker v. Second Judicial Dist. Court, 136 Nev. 678, 680-81, 476 

P.3d 1194, 1196-97 (2020) (recognizing the petitioner's substantial burden 

to demonstrate a clear legal right to a particular course of action where the 

court is entrusted with discretion on the issue); Poulos v. Eighth Judicial 

Dist. Court, 98 Nev. 453, 455, 652 P.2d 1177, 1178 (1982) (recognizing that 

it is within this court's discretion whether to issue a writ of mandamus); 

Round Hill Gen. Improvement Dist. v. Newman, 97 Nev. 601, 603-04, 637 

P.2d 534, 536 (1981) (recognizing that a writ of mandamus is available to 

compel the performance of an action which the law requires as a duty 

resulting from an office, trust, or station or to control an arbitrary or 

capricious exercise of discretion). Here, the district court conducted a 

hearing on petitioner's motion to set reasonable bail and entered written 

Z2-osS-0.3 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEvADA 

(0) 1947A 446Plo 
findings addressing the relevant statutory factors. Valdez-Jimenez v. 

Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 136 Nev. 155, 164-66, 460 P.3d 976, 986-87 

(2020). Accordingly, we 

ORDER the petition DENIED.' 

Ai4G4i1 , J. 

Stiglich 

Sr.J. 

cc: Hon. Erika D. Ballou, District Judge 

The Law Firm of C. Benjamin Scroggins, Esq. 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Clark County District Attorney 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

'The Honorable Mark Gibbons, Senior Justice, participated in the 

decision of this matter under a general order of assignment. 

2
§ 766.13 Sale of aviation fuel, oil, services and supplies. ( a ) *General policy.* In accordance with sections 1107 and 1108 of the Federal Aviation Act of 1958 (72 Stat. 798 as amended, 49 U.S.C. 1507, 1508), Navy/Marine Corps Aviation fuel, oil, services, and supplies are not sold to civil aircraft in competition with private enterprise. Sections 1107 and 1108 of Federal Aviation Act of 1958 (72 Stat. 798 as amended, 49 U.S.C. 1507, 1508), however, does authorize the sales of fuel, oil, equipment, supplies, mechanical service, and other assistance by reason of an emergency. Such sales will be made only where there is no commercial source and only in the amount necessary for the aircraft to continue on its course to the nearest airport operated by private enterprise.
( b ) *Contract aircraft.* The sale of aviation fuel, oil, supplies, etc. to aircraft under U.S. Government contract or charter is permitted at, and limited to, points where passengers or cargo are loaded into or discharged from the aircraft under terms of the contract or charter. Sales are not authorized at naval aviation facilities where commercial supplies and service are available.
Editorial Note on Part 724
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 724 appear at 65 FR 62616, Oct. 19, 2000.

§ 724.807 Record of NDRB proceedings. ( a ) When the proceedings in any review have been concluded, a record thereof will be prepared. Records may include written records, electromagnetic records, audio and/or videotape recordings, or a combination.
( b ) At a minimum, the record will include the following: ( 1 ) The application for review;
( 2 ) A record of the testimony in either verbatim, summarized, or recorded form at the option of the NDRB;
( 3 ) Documentary evidence or copies, other than the military service record considered by the NDRB;
( 4 ) Briefs and arguments submitted by or on behalf of the applicant;
( 5 ) Advisory opinions considered by the NDRB, if any:
( 6 ) The findings, conclusions, and reasons developed by the NDRB;
( 7 ) Notification of the NDRB's decision to the cognizant custodian of the applicant's records, or reference to the notification document;
( 8 ) A copy of the decisional document.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA F OURTH D ISTRICT

ELIEZER DIAZ , Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA , Appellee.

No. 4D 20

- 331

[ April 30, 2020 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.8 5 0 motion from the Circuit Court for the Fift eenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; Rosemarie Scher

, Judge; L.T. Case No. 50

- 2016

- CF

- 003269

- AXXX

- MB

.

Eliezer Diaz

, Perry , pro se

.
No appearance required for appellee

.

P ER C URIAM

.
Affirmed.

G ROSS , D AMOORGIAN and C ONNER , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
C. A. No. 73-299.

#### State *v.*Robert Marquis.

*Richard J. Israel,*Attorney General, *Donald P. Ryan,*Asst. Attorney General, for plaintiff. *William F. Reilly,*Public Defender, *Allegra E. Munson,*Asst. Public Defender, for defendant.

Motion of defendant to remand is granted, and the matter is remanded to the Superior Court with direction that said court hold an evidentiary hearing on and decide the issues of adequacy and effectiveness of counsel.
# TYPHCCn**~fi#J•I•I ..aK**  The 

# Easiest Drone

# to Fly

SPECIFICATIONS

TYPHOON 

# 0 500 Multicopter

FLIGHTTIME: Up to 25 Minutes DIMENSIONS: 9.45 in (210mm) x 16.54 in (420mm) DIAGONAL MOTOR TO MOTOR DISTANCE: 20 in (510mm) PROPELLER/MAIN ROTOR DIAMETER: 13.0 in (330mm) WEIGHT WITHOUT BATTERY AND PAYLOAD: 40.0 oz (1130g) MAXIMUM TAKEOFF WEIGHT WITH CG03: 60.0 oz (1700g) BATTERY: 5400mAh 3S 11.1V LiPo (included) CHARGER: 3S 11.1V LiPo DC Balancing Smart Charger with AC Adapter (included) TRANSMITTER: 10-channel 2.4GHz with 5.8GHz video downlink (included) MAXIMUM FLYING ALTITUDE: Default 400 Feet Above Ground Level (Adjustable via the Q500 GUI) RADIO CONTROL FREQUENCY BAND: 2.4GHz


# ST1

# 0+ Personal Ground Station

NUMBER OF CHANNELS: 10 OPERATING SYSTEM: AndroidTM SCREEN SIZE: 5.5" SCREEN RESOLUTION: 854 x 480 RADIO CONTROL FREQUENCY BAND: 2.4GHz CONTROLTRANSMISSION DISTANCE/RANGE (OPTIMUM CONDITIONS): FCC Compliance: Up to BOOm (2624.67 ft) ICE Compliance: Up to 400m (1312.34 ft) ROBUST RADIO CONTROL MODULATION: Yuneec Protocol VIDEO LINK FREQUENCY BAND: 5.8GHz FLIGHT SYSTEMS TELEMETRY DATA ON SCREEN DISPLAY (OSD): Yes TACTILE AND AUDIBLE FEEDBACK: Yes BUILT-IN LIPO BATTERY VOLTAGE 

### I CAPACITY: 3.6V/5200mAh 18.72Wh 

# CG03 Gimbal Camera

DIMENSION: 4.5x1.4x2.9in (115x135x74mm) WEIGHT: 6.9oz (195g) SENSOR: 1/2.3" CMOS EFFECTIVE PIXELS: 12 Megapixels CAMERA LENS: 0.6in (14mm)/F2.8(1.4in/35mm)- No Distortion VIDEO FOV: 115 Degree ELECTRONIC SHUTTER: 1/30- 1/8000 WORKING TEMPERATURE: -1 0°C-40°C POWER CONSUMPTION: 10W VIDEO TRANSMISSION RANGE: Up to 500m (1640ft) TRANSMISSION SYSTEM: 5.2Ghz- 5.8Ghz VIDEO UHD: 4K at 30FPS, 2.7K at 30FPS, 2.5K at 30FPS FULL HD: 1080p at 24/25/30/48/50/60/120FPS HD: 720p at 24/25/30/48/50/60/120FPS MICROPHONE: Yes


# CGO SteadygripTM
DIMENSIONS: 8.78 in (223mm) x 2.95 in (75mm) x 7.13 in (181mm) WEIGHT (WITHOUT CAMERA/GIMBAL): 13.9oz (395g) COMPATIBLE CAMERA: CG02 Series 

### I GoPro Hero4 Black with GB203 Gimbal

# YUnc.c.~ ELECTRIC AVIATION 

### www.yuneec.com
#### James Connor *et al. v.*The Town of West Chicago.

*Filed at Ottawa June 13, 1896.*

The opinion in the case of *Farrell*v. *Town of West Chicago, (ante,*p. 280,) is decisive of this, the questions being the same.

Writ of Error to the County Court of Cook county; the Hon. Prank Scales, Judge, presiding.

George W. Wilbur, (N. A. Partridge, of counsel,) for plaintiffs in error.

Per Curiam :

The questions presented on this record are the same as those in *Farrell*v. *Town of West Chicago, (ante,*p. 280,) and the opinion in that case is decisive of this. The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

*Reversed and remanded.*
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20
- 1166

STARSHA M. SEWELL, a/k/a Adele T. , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. MARGARET WEICHERT, Acting Director, Office of Personnel Management Agency , Defendant

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Greenbelt

. Theodore D. Chu a ng , District Judge. ( 8:20

- cv
- 00163

- TDC )

Submitted : June 18, 2020 Decided: June 22, 2020

Before FLOYD, THACKER, and RUSHING , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Starsha M. Sewell, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Starsha M. Sewell appeals the district court’s orders dismissing her civil complaint, in which Sewell alleged that Defendant committed a civil RICO violation, and denying Sewell’s Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion to alter or amend judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm f or the reasons stated by the
district court. Sewell v. Weichert , No. 8:20

- cv
- 00163

- TDC (D. Md. Jan. 31, 2020 & Feb. 7, 2020). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this cou rt and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 191 (Wednesday, October 2, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 60994-60995]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-24111]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8492]

U.S. National Commission for UNESCO; Notice of Teleconference 
Meeting

    The U.S. National Commission for UNESCO will hold a conference call 
on Thursday, October 17, 2013, from 11:00 a.m. until 12:00 p.m. Eastern 
Time. The purpose of the teleconference meeting is to consider the 
recommendations of the Commission's National Committee for the 
International Hydrological Programme (IHP). The call will also be an 
opportunity to provide an update on

[[Page 60995]]

recent and upcoming Commission and UNESCO activities. The Commission 
will accept brief oral comments during a portion of this conference 
call. The public comment period will be limited to approximately 10 
minutes in total, with two minutes allowed per speaker. For more 
information or to arrange to participate in the conference call, 
individuals must make arrangements with the Executive Director of the 
National Commission by October 15.
    The National Commission, Washington, DC 20037 may be contacted via 
email DCUNESCO@state.gov or Telephone (202) 663-0026; Fax (202) 663-
0035. The Web site can be accessed at: http://www.state.gov/p/io/unesco/.

    Dated: September 24, 2013.
Allison Wright,
Executive Director, U.S. National Commission for UNESCO, Department of 
State.
[FR Doc. 2013-24111 Filed 10-1-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-19-P
```