alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 693.

#### Benjamin Horowitz et al. *v.*United States.

Error to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.

April 19, 1920.

*Mr. John J. Fitzgerald*and *Mr. Elijah*A. *Zoline,*for plaintiffs in error, in support of the petition.

*Mr. Assistant Attorney General Stewart,*for the United States, in opposition to the petition.

Petition for a writ of certiorari herein denied.
No. 749.

#### J. W. Atkins *v.*L. G. Garrett.

March 8, 1920.

*Mr. Walter S. Penfield, Mr. W. B. Spencer*and *Mr. Charles Payne Fenner*for petitioner.

No appearance for respondent.

Petition for a writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
<PAGE>


                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

                                  Certification
            Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned officers of EDO Corporation, a New York corporation (the "Company"),
does hereby certify that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 26, 2005 (the
"Form 10-Q") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained
in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                                /s/ JAMES M. SMITH
Dated: April 29, 2005                           --------------------------------
                                                Name:   James M. Smith
                                                Title:  Chairman, President and
                                                        Chief Executive Officer

                                                /s/ FREDERIC B. BASSETT
Dated: April 29, 2005                           --------------------------------
                                                Name:   Frederic B. Bassett
                                                Title:  Vice President-Finance,
                                                        Treasurer and Chief
                                                        Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 37.1005 What are my general responsibilities concerning the award document? You are responsible for ensuring that the award document is complete and accurate. Your objective is to create a document that: ( a ) Addresses all issues;
( b ) States requirements directly. It is not helpful to readers to incorporate statutes or rules by reference, without sufficient explanation of the requirements. You generally should not incorporate clauses from the Federal Acquisition Regulation (48 CFR parts 1-53) or Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (48 CFR parts 201-253), because those provisions are designed for procurement contracts that are used to acquire goods and services, rather than for TIAs or other assistance instruments.
( c ) Is written in clear and concise language, to minimize potential ambiguity.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1409-G

U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Grid of the ground-water flow model—PLATE 1
‘Mason, J. L., Ground-water hydrology and simulated effects of
development in the Milford area, an arid basin in southwestern Utah

113°00"
COLUMNS
1 5 10 155320, 25
1 c\alcicie|a|a 2°50"
|
it iS
T.248.
LeyG|
G {| / e
P
5 cS LETT S | te
g
e ark oa
¥ =
la | Tl g
> | 5 c T258.
G A ‘ea c
1 | ! c
7 ee ee A 2 ee | ee
1 RB-COUNTY
6 -4—-—--=4-—— -44 444 -. b-- et-
‘= ; ; BAYER EOPNTY
S Ry IE
& G iS ¢ 268.
5
= 15 «|S iS c
m,
= G¢ ¢ G
i
any D) |
wo ¢ | ‘ ©} seen
G c
| c
2 G ICU | 1278.
2 a 2&7
r a MI = ray
2 ey Ly z E a —
G { c
25 Gt PEAK
c =
- a £ Fd 288.
30 Wi
¢ Ss
é =
38°20"
38°20' | f Al | V_ iC.
35 a 12°50!
rg
i
Cc
40 £ c
| ic s.
45|G c
e A FA ACH te
& SNC
| 7s Ka :
G S {+14
—— | 50|¢ | Po TTT | Ae a
| | c
we Roll p+ tt ‘ EXPLANATION
5 —
— «| | 4 4
A |S pestered Mn
= = = = po Daa ee a | a - 4 7 4 fe] ‘Constant-head cell (initial steady-state conditions)
or constant-flux cell (transient-state conditions)
G
[s] General-head cell at boundary having basin inflow or outflow
55 |G HE Callin which pumped well(s) located during 1950-83 simulation
ae |_| Inactive cell
13°10" ———— Boundary of study area
R13 W. Ri2W. RW. R.10W. ROW,
Fiction 1250000, ‘ 1 7 =
j a rrr
1953, revised 1972
5 oO 5 10 KILOMETERS

Map showing grid of the ground-water flow model of the basin-fill aquifer and active cells,

specified boundary cells, and cells having pumped wells, Milford area, southwestern Utah

By
James L. Mason
1998
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

ALS 88 DESIGN BUILD, LLC § §

v. § No. 04

- 15

- 00096

- CV § MOAB CONSTRUCTION §

APPELLANT’S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE REPLY BRIEF

TO THE HONORABLE JUSTICES OF THE COURT:

App ellant’s Reply Brief is due to be filed on Se ptember 30, 2015. Appellant requests a

7 day extension of time to file its Reply Brief. Appellant’s counsel needs additional time to
fully address the response brief and legal authorities raised therein for each of the issues
presented. Appellant requests an extension to and including Wednesday, October 7, 2015.
Respectfully submitted this the 30th day of September, 2015.

Law Office of Regina Bacon Criswell Carriage Place 7803 Bent Briar San Antonio, Texas 78250 (210) 775-1155 (ofc) (210) 251-2071 (fax)

By: /S/Regina Bacon Criswell
SBN: 01496580

Attorney for Appellants

CERTIF ICATE OF SERVICE This is to certify that a true and correct copy of the above and forgoing w as served in accordance with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure on the persons listed below in the manner indicated.

Tom Hall Via e-file Attorney for MOAB Construction Company, Inc.

/S/Regina Bacon Criswell REGINA B. CRISWELL ACCEPTED 04-15-00096-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 9/30/2015 3:33:22 PM KEITH HOTTLE CLERK
§ 865.107 DRB composition and meeting location. ( a ) The DRB consists of five members, with the senior line officer acting as the presiding officer. The presiding officer convenes, recesses and adjourns the Board.
( b ) In addition to holding hearings in Washington, DC, the DRB, as a convenience to applicants, periodically conducts hearings at selected locations throughout the Continental United States. Reviews are conducted at locations central to those areas with the greatest number of applicants. A continuing review and appraisal is conducted to ensure the selected hearing locations are responsive to a majority of applicants. Administrative details and responsibilities for Regional Boards are outlined in § 865.124.
# FY15 PRESIDENT'S BUDGET
MEMORANDUM

TO: The Assistant Secretary for 

 Special Education and Rehabilitative Services

 The Assistant Secretary for

 Elementary and Secondary Education

 The Assistant Secretary for Career, Technical,

 And Adult Education

FROM: The Secretary 

SUBJECT: Delegation of Authority over Certain Appeals Pursuant to Section 432(b) of the 

General Education Provisions Act

I. DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY

Under the authority vested in me by section 412 of the Department of Education 

Organization Act, 20 U.S.C. §3472, I hereby delegate to you, your successor in function, or

to anyone serving for you in an acting capacity or officially performing the functions and 

duties of your position, the authority to take any appropriate action under section 432(b) of 

the General Education Provisions Act, 20 U.S.C. §1231b-2(b), including, but not limited to, 

determining whether the final action of a State educational agency taken under an 

applicable program for which your Principal Office has administrative responsibility as 

provided by law or by delegation of authority pursuant to law was contrary to Federal law 

or applicable rules, regulations or guidelines and, if so, issuing an order to the State 

educational agency prescribing appropriate action to be taken by such agency, as well as

issuing interim orders to State educational agencies pending appeal or review.

Unless otherwise noted in future delegations of authority, amendments to the authority 

cited herein are included within the scope of this delegation.

II. RESERVATIONS

None.

III. REDELEGATION

You may not redelegate this authority.

IV. CERTIFICATION AND EFFECTIVE DATE

This delegation is effective upon certification by the Department's Delegations Control 

Officer. I hereby ratify actions within the scope of this delegation taken by you, your 
predecessors in function, or anyone serving in an acting capacity or officially performing 

the functions and duties of your position, which involved the exercise of the authorities

delegated herein, prior to the date of the certification of this delegation.

_______-s-_ ________________

 Arne Duncan

OGC Clearance and Date: Deborah Friendly, May 1, 2014

Certified Date: June 13, 2014

Departmental Delegations Control Officer: Bruce Monblatt 

Control Number: EA/ES/92
§ 651.9 Introduction. ( a ) The NEPA process is the systematic examination of possible and probable environmental consequences of implementing a proposed action. Integration of the NEPA process with other Army projects and program planning must occur at the earliest possible time to ensure that: ( 1 ) Planning and decision-making reflect Army environmental values, such as compliance with environmental policy, laws, and regulations; and that these values are evident in Army decisions. In addition, Army decisions must reflect consideration of other requirements such as Executive Orders and other non-statutory requirements, examples of which are enumerated in § 651.14(e).
( 2 ) Army and DOD environmental policies and directives are implemented.
( 3 ) Delays and potential conflicts in the process are minimized. The public should be involved as early as possible to avoid potential delays.
( b ) All Army decision-making that may impact the human environment will use a systematic, interdisciplinary approach that ensures the integrated use of the natural and social sciences, planning, and the environmental design arts (section 102(2)(a), Public Law 91-190, 83 Stat. 852, National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA)). This approach allows timely identification of environmental effects and values in sufficient detail for concurrent evaluation with economic, technical, and mission-related analyses, early in the decision process.
( c ) The proponent of an action or project must identify and describe the range of reasonable alternatives to accomplish the purpose and need for the proposed action or project, taking a “hard look” at the magnitude of potential impacts of implementing the reasonable alternatives, and evaluating their significance. To assist in identifying reasonable alternatives, the proponent should consult with the installation environmental office and appropriate federal, tribal, state, and local agencies, and the general public.
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 6 (Monday, January 11, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2004-2005]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-00210]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT


OPM Guidance Documents Web Portal

AGENCY: Office of Personnel Management.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Office of Personnel Management (OPM) is announcing an 
online centralized portal that includes information about our guidance 
and a searchable, indexed listing of, and links to, our guidance 
documents. The portal, located on our website, does not displace other 
listings of or links to our guidance documents in topic-specific 
sections of our website.

DATES: The guidance portal is accessible by the public on the date of 
publication of this notice.

ADDRESSES: OPM's guidance Web Portal is available at www.opm.gov/guidance.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alexys Stanley, Regulatory Affairs 
Analyst, and <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a4d6c1c3d1c8c5d0cbd6dd8acdcac2cbd6c9c5d0cdcbcae4cbd4c98ac3cbd2"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="5b293e3c2e373a2f3429227532353d3429363a2f3234351b342b36753c342d">[email protected]</span></a> or via telephone at (202) 
606-1000.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Executive Order 13891, and OMB implementing 
guidance memorandum M-20-02, require Federal agencies to establish an 
online, centralized, searchable database of their guidance documents, 
to include certain identifying information, and to provide information 
on how to comment on open guidance and how to request revisions to the 
agency's guidance. They also require agencies to publish notice in the 
Federal Register of the new guidance portal.

[[Page 2005]]

    In compliance with the above, OPM is publishing this notice of the 
availability of a single, searchable, indexed database containing OPM 
guidance documents currently in effect, which may be accessed at 
www.opm.gov/guidance.

    Office of Personnel Management.
Alexys Stanley,
Regulatory Affairs Analyst.
[FR Doc. 2021-00210 Filed 1-8-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6325-46-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 3 (Wednesday, January 6, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 557-558]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-29292]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4461-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2020-0001]


Illinois; Amendment No. 3 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Illinois (FEMA-4461-DR), dated September 19, 2019, and 
related determinations.

DATES: This change occurred on December 28, 2020.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and 
Recovery, Federal Emergency

[[Page 558]]

Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-
2833.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Emergency Management Agency 
(FEMA) hereby gives notice that pursuant to the authority vested in the 
Administrator, under Executive Order 12148, as amended, Brian Schiller, 
of FEMA is appointed to act as the Federal Coordinating Officer for 
this disaster.
    This action terminates the appointment of Steven W. Johnson as 
Federal Coordinating Officer for this disaster.

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community 
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 
97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment 
Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, 
Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing Operations for 
Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster 
Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other Needs; 97.036, 
Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared 
Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Pete Gaynor,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2020-29292 Filed 1-5-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

##     Chief Operating Officer, FSA    

Top

##     Chief Administration Officer
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

In the

United States Court of Appeals

For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________

No. 22-12786

Non-Argument Calendar

____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOHNATHAN RANDALL TOWNSEND, 

Defendant-Appellant.

____________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Alabama

D.C. Docket No. 1:20-cr-00158-JB-B-1

____________________

USCA11 Case: 22-12786 Document: 23-1 Date Filed: 01/12/2023 Page: 1 of 2
2 Opinion of the Court 22-12786

Before ROSENBAUM, LAGOA, and BRASHER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The Government’s motion to dismiss this appeal pursuant 

to the appeal waiver in Appellant’s plea agreement is GRANTED. 

See United States v. Bushert, 997 F.2d 1343, 1350–51 (11th Cir. 

1993) (sentence appeal waiver will be enforced if it was made 

knowingly and voluntarily); United States v. Bascomb, 451 F.3d 

1292, 1297 (11th Cir. 2006) (holding that the defendant knowingly 

and voluntarily waived his right to appeal a sentence on the ground 

that its length, which was below the statutory maximum, was cruel 

and unusual under the Eighth Amendment); United States v. Boyd, 

975 F.3d 1185, 1192 (11th Cir. 2020) (sentence appeal waiver will be 

enforced where “it was clearly conveyed to the defendant that he 

was giving up his right to appeal most circumstances” (quotation 

marks and brackets omitted)); United States v. Grinard-Henry, 399 

F.3d 1294, 1296 (11th Cir. 2005) (waiver of the right to appeal includes waiver of the right to appeal difficult or debatable legal issues or even blatant error).

USCA11 Case: 22-12786 Document: 23-1 Date Filed: 01/12/2023 Page: 2 of 2
#### Sara Young et al., Respondents, v. Sovah Realty Corporation, Defendant; and Royal Elevator Company, Inc., Appellant.

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, defendant Royal Elevator Company, Inc., appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated June 20, 1962, which granted plaintiffs’ motion to vacate said defendant’s notice to take a physical medical examination of the plaintiff, Sara Young, and required plaintiffs to serve copies of all medical reports of physicians who will testify upon their behalf. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements (see *Juett*v. *Paesani,*19 A D 2d 726). Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-27-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-28-1998
<CASH>                                             396
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,051
<ALLOWANCES>                                       335
<INVENTORY>                                      2,689
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                24,565
<PP&E>                                           9,982
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,954
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  29,804
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,958
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      2,351
<COMMON>                                         3,518
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    29,804
<SALES>                                         13,456
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                13,456
<CGS>                                            8,424
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,204
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    77
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 598
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,153
<INCOME-TAX>                                       395
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                758
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                           61
<NET-INCOME>                                       697
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.16
        

</TABLE>
**MEMORANDUM**

TO:Principal Officers

FROM:The Secretary

SUBJECT:Delegation of Authority

I. DELEGATION

Under the authority vested in me by section 412 of the Department of Education Organization Act (DEOA) (Public Law 96-88), 20 U.S.C. 3472, I hereby delegate to you for employees in your Principal Office the authority described in 34 C.F.R. Part 8 regarding demands issued to Departmental employees for testifying or records in legal proceedings.  This authority only applies to legal proceedings in which the United States is not a party.

Unless otherwise noted in future delegations of authority, amendments to the existing authorities delegated herein are included within the scope of this delegation.

II. RESERVATION

The authority should be exercised in consultation with the Office of the General Counsel.

III. REDELEGATION

This authority may be redelegated to Senior officials in your office who report directly to you.  No other redelegation is permitted.

IV. CERTIFICATION AND EFFECTIVE DATE

This delegation is effective upon certification by the Department’s Principal Delegations Control Officer and supersedes all previous delegations of this authority.

_______/s/___________

        Richard W. Riley

Page 2 – Delegation of Authority

OGC Clearance and Date:/s/ R. Wexler, 9/2/92

Certified Date:   9/4/92

Control No.    EA/EV/40

Certified by:   /s/ Wilma J. Hodo______________

                       Departmental Delegations Control Officer

Addressees:

Principal Officers and List and PO Control No.

EA/EB/132 – Deputy Secretary

EA/EC/150 – Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights

EA/EE/3 – Assistant Secretary for Policy and Planning

EA/EF/58 – Inspector General

EA/EG/54 – General Counsel

EA/EH/61 – Assistant Secretary for Special Education and Rehabilitative Services

EA/EJ/22 - Assistant Secretary for Legislation and Congressional Affairs

EA/EK/75 - Assistant Secretary for Intergovernmental and Interagency Affairs

EA/EL/43 – Assistant Secretary for Management and Budget/CFO

EA/EM/180 – Assistant Secretary for Human Resources and Administration

EA/EP/183 - Assistant Secretary for Postsecondary Education

EA/ES/42 - Assistant Secretary for Elementary and Secondary Education

EA/ET/34 - Director, OBEMLA

EA/EV/40 - Assistant Secretary for Vocational and Adult Education

EA/EI/2 – Chief Information Officer

 EA/EN/2 – Chief Operating Officer, FSA

EA/EQ/2 – Deputy Under Secretary for Safe and Drug-Free Schools

EA/ER/1 – Director, Institute of Education Sciences

EA/EU/2 – Deputy Under Secretary for Innovation and Improvement