alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-29-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1995
<CASH>                                          33,265
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   18,667
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,119
<INVENTORY>                                      8,629
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                63,789
<PP&E>                                          72,418
<DEPRECIATION>                                  50,698
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  90,825
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           12,603
<BONDS>                                            285
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        53,125
<OTHER-SE>                                     114,694
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    90,825
<SALES>                                        107,643
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               107,643
<CGS>                                           68,200
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   68,200
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                18,200
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  71
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 22,403
<INCOME-TAX>                                    8,432
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             13,971
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    13,971
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .85
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .85
        

</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-50232

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JOHN EDWARD MILLIGAN, also known as Johnny Yahoo, also known as John

Milligan,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 6:09-CR-191-8

Before REAVLEY, SMITH, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent John Edward Milligan has moved for

leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,

386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). 

Milligan has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the

relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s

assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. 

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

April 4, 2012

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 11-50232 Document: 00511811672 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/04/2012
No. 11-50232

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is

excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. 

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

2

Case: 11-50232 Document: 00511811672 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/04/2012
#### § 751.1 Scope.

This part prescribes procedures and substantive bases for administrative settlement of claims against the United States submitted by Department of Navy (DoN) personnel and civilian employees of the naval establishment.

[72 FR 53422, Sept. 19, 2007]
##### 



EMS Technologies, Inc.
1997 Stock Incentive Plan
 Restricted Stock Award
Restriction Agreement
With
 
 July 28, 2006
    1. Grant of Shares.
  2. Restriction.




---



##### 



3. Lapse of Restriction by Passage of Time.
 4. Lapse of Restriction by Death or Disability.
 . Forfeiture of Shares.
 6. Endorsement and Retention of Certificates.
    7. Withholding Taxes.




---



##### 



8. No Rights to Continued Employment.
 9. Succession.
 10. Dividends.
    EMS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.By:Paul B. DomorskiChairman of the Board




---



##### 



,     ,
 , 2006SignaturePrinted Name
Overview of Clothes Washer 

Rulemaking Status 

Clothes Washer Workshop 

(~ 

/ 
Clothes Washer Workshop 

Revisions to Analyses 

• NOPR Analyses 

• Life-Cycle-Cost - includes marginal energy and 

water rates 

• National Energy Savings - includes new shipment 

forecast 

• Consumer Survey - completed 

~I 

' Q 

I 
 

 

r;l ,,_-4-1- .-...-.. "'°' T - _ l_ - f--

vlU lllC~ vv asne 

Revi~ions to Analyses 

NOPR Analyses (cont'd) 

• Shipments Analysis - new spreadsheet developed 

• Manufacturer Impact Analysis - GRIM Spreadsheet 

• Net National Employment - new results 

• Environmental Assessment - new results 

~) 

' 

I
THE SECRETARY OF EDUCATION

WASHINGTON, DC 20202

 

TO: The Chief Operating Officer

Federal Student Aid 

FROM: The Secretary 

SUBJECT: Delegation of Authority to Reconsider or Reopen Borrower Defense 

Applications under 34 C.F.R. § 685.222(e) or any successor regulations 

I. DELEGATION

Under the authority vested in me by section 412 of the Department of Education 

Organization Act, 20 U.S.C. § 3472, I hereby delegate to you, your successor in 

function, and anyone serving for you in an acting capacity or delegated the 

authority to perform the functions and duties of your position as follows: 

A. The authority under 34 C.F.R. § 685.222(e)(5)(i) or any successor 

regulation to reconsider a borrower defense application at any time 

when a borrower identifies new evidence that was not considered in 

making the previous decision. 

B. The authority under 34 C.F.R. § 685.222(e)(5)(ii) or any successor 

regulation to reopen a borrower defense application at any time to 

consider evidence that was not considered in making the previous 

decision. 

C. The authority to reconsider a borrower defense application at any time

if a clear error of fact or law is discovered in a previous decision made 

by any official at the Department. 

D. The authority to reopen a borrower defense application at any time if a

clear error of fact or law is discovered in a previous decision made by 

any official at the Department. 

E. The authority under 34 C.F.R. § 685.222(e)(2) or any successor

regulation to carry out the procedures for granting forbearances and for 

defaulted loans associated with any borrower defense application

reconsidered or reopened under the authorities delegated above. 

F. For any borrower defense application reconsidered or reopened under 

the authorities delegated above, the authority to review any such

borrower defense application under the procedures delineated under 34 
C.F.R. § 685.222(e)(3) or any successor regulation, including the 

designation of a Department official to process the reconsidered or 

reopened borrower application. 

Unless otherwise noted in future delegations of authority, amendments to the 

authorities delegated herein are included in the scope of this delegation. 

II. RESERVATIONS

None. 

III. REDELEGATION

Subject to applicable provisions of law, you may redelegate any of the authorities 

delegated to you and may authorize further redelegation. All redelegations must 

be prepared in accordance with the Administrative Communications Systems 

directive, ACSD-OFO-015, Delegations of Authority. 

IV. CERTIFICATION AND EFFECTIVE DATE

This delegation is effective upon certification by the Department’s Principal 

Delegations Control Officer. 

I ratify actions within the scope of this delegation taken by you prior to the date of 

certification. 

 ______________/s__________ 

 Miguel A. Cardona 

OGC Clearance and Date: Michael Taylor; 2/16/2022 

Certified date: 2/16/2022 

Control #: EA/EN/99 

Delegations Control Officer: Jim Clemmens
### §561. Definitions

In this subchapter:

#### (1) Administration

The term "Administration" means the Transportation Security Administration.

#### (2) Administrator

The term "Administrator" means the Administrator of the Transportation Security Administration.

#### (3) Plan

The term "Plan" means the strategic 5-year technology investment plan developed by the Administrator under section 563 of this title.

#### (4) Security-related technology

The term "security-related technology" means any technology that assists the Administration in the prevention of, or defense against, threats to United States transportation systems, including threats to people, property, and information.

(Pub. L. 107–296, title XVI, §1601, as added Pub. L. 113–245, §3(a), Dec. 18, 2014, 128 Stat. 2871.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 1601 of Pub. L. 107–296, title XVI, Nov. 25, 2002, 116 Stat. 2312, amended sections 114 and 40119 of Title 49, Transportation, see section 3(c) of Pub. L. 113–245, set out as a note below.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Findings

Pub. L. 113–245, §2, Dec. 18, 2014, 128 Stat. 2871, provided that: "Congress finds the following:

"(1) The Transportation Security Administration has not consistently implemented Department of Homeland Security policies and Government best practices for acquisition and procurement.

"(2) The Transportation Security Administration has only recently developed a multiyear technology investment plan, and has underutilized innovation opportunities within the private sector, including from small businesses.

"(3) The Transportation Security Administration has faced challenges in meeting key performance requirements for several major acquisitions and procurements, resulting in reduced security effectiveness and wasted expenditures."

#### Prior Amendments Not Affected

Pub. L. 113–245, §3(c), Dec. 18, 2014, 128 Stat. 2877, provided that: "Nothing in this section [enacting this subchapter] may be construed to affect any amendment made by title XVI of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 [title XVI of Pub. L. 107–296, amending sections 114, 40119, 44935 and 46301 of Title 49, Transportation] as in effect before the date of enactment of this Act [Dec. 18, 2014]."
### §2113. Certification of cotton producer organizations

The eligibility of each cotton producer organization to represent cotton producers of a cotton producing State to request the issuance of an order under section 2103 of this title, and to participate in the making of nominations under section 2106(b) of this title shall be certified by the Secretary and shall be based in addition to other available information upon a factual report submitted by the organization which shall contain information deemed relevant and specified by the Secretary for the making of such determination, including the following:

(a) Geographic territory within the State covered by the organization's active membership;

(b) Nature and size of the organization's active membership in the State, proportion of total of such active membership accounted for by farmers, a map showing the cotton-producing counties in such State in which the organization has members, the volume of cotton produced in each such county, the number of cotton producers in each such county, and the size of the organization's active cotton producer membership in each such county;

(c) The extent to which the cotton producer membership of such organization is represented in setting the organization's policies;

(d) Evidence of stability and permanency of the organization;

(e) Sources from which the organization's operating funds are derived;

(f) Functions of the organization; and

(g) The organization's ability and willingness to further the aims and objectives of this chapter:

Provided, however, That the primary consideration in determining the eligibility of an organization shall be whether its cotton farmer membership consists of a sufficiently large number of the cotton producers who produce a relatively significant volume of cotton to reasonably warrant its participation in the nomination of members for the Cotton Board. The Secretary shall certify any cotton producer organization which he finds to be eligible under this section, and his determination as to eligibility shall be final.

(Pub. L. 89–502, §14, July 13, 1966, 80 Stat. 284.)
EXHIBIT 24

POWER OF ATTORNEY

Each person whose signature appears below hereby authorizes Peter B. Knepper, as attorney-in-fact and agent, with full powers of
substitution, to sign on his behalf, individually and in the capacities stated below, and to file any and all amendments to this Form 10-K, and other documents in connection
therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting to said attorney-in-fact and agent full power and authority to perform any other act on behalf of the
undersigned required to be done in the premises.

|Signatures                          |  | Title                                                              |  | Date          
|----------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | --------------
|                                    |  |                                                                    |  |               
|/s/RICHARD J. DAHLRichard J. Dahl   |  | Chairman of the Board                                              |  | August 1, 2008
|/s/JACK O. VANCEJack O. Vance       |  | Director                                                           |  | August 1, 2008
|/s/ROCHUS E. VOGTRochus E. Vogt     |  | Director                                                           |  | August 1, 2008
|/s/JAMES D. PLUMMERJames D. Plummer |  | Director                                                           |  | August 1, 2008
|/s/ROBERT ATTIYEHRobert Attiyeh     |  | Director                                                           |  | August 1, 2008
|/s/THOMAS A. LACEYThomas A. Lacey   |  | Director                                                           |  | August 1, 2008
|/s/MARY B. CRANSTONMary B. Cranston |  | Director                                                           |  | August 1, 2008
|/s/OLEG KHAYKINOleg Khaykin         |  | Director and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) |  | August 1, 2008

---



QuickLinks
EXHIBIT 32.2
         Certification of the Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 18
             U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
                        of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with this quarterly report of Espey Mfg. & Electronics  Corp. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the  date  hereof,  I,  David  O'Neil,
Treasurer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

      1.    The report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The  information  contained in this report fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

Date: May 08, 2006


                                               /s/ David O'Neil
                                               ---------------------------
                                               David O'Neil, Treasurer and
                                               Principal Financial Officer




                                       17
Order entered September 18, 2017.

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-17-00678-CR

THYREN CLENT JUSTUS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 363rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F-1653093-W

ORDER

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DIRECT the Clerk to issue the mandate in 

this appeal INSTANTER.

/s/ DAVID EVANS 

JUSTICE
### §2255a. Financial assistance to national and international conferences

On and after October 21, 1993, appropriations available to the Department of Agriculture can be used to provide financial assistance to the organizers of national and international conferences, if such conferences are in support of agency programs.

(Pub. L. 103–111, title I, Oct. 21, 1993, 107 Stat. 1050.)
**UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION**

TO:JoAnn Ryan, Executive Officer

Brenda Long, Administrative Officer

Office of the Secretary

FROM:The Assistant Secretary

 Office of Communications and Outreach

SUBJECT: Delegation of Authority to Certify Fund Availability

I.DELEGATION

Under the authority vested in me by a delegation from the Secretary delegating administrative authorities as delegated to all Principal Officers, EA/EO/2,  certified on November 17, 2005, I hereby delegate to you, and to anyone serving for you in an acting capacity, the authority to certify funds available for administering the functions and responsibilities of the Office of Communications and Outreach.  This authority is issued pursuant to Title 31 of the U.S. Code, which governs the money and finances of the Department.

Unless otherwise noted in future delegations of authority, amendments to the authority delegated herein are included in the scope of this delegation.

II.RESERVATIONS

None.

III. REDELEGATION

This authority may not be redelegated

IV.CERTIFICATION AND EFFECTIVE DATE

This delegation is effective upon certification by the Department's Principal Delegations Control Officer and supersedes all previous delegation of this authority.  I hereby ratify actions within the scope of this delegation taken by you prior to the date of certification.

__________/s/____________ 

            Kevin Sullivan 

OGC Clearance and Date:  /s/ David Berthiaume, 4/13/2006

Certified Date:  4/20/2006

Departmental Delegations Control Officer:  /s/ Naty G. Beetle

Control Number:  EO/EA1/155
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Three-Five
Systems, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, Jack L. Saltich, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
78m(a) or 78o(d)); and  (2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company. /s/ Jack L. SaltichJack L. SaltichPresident and Chief Executive Officer
 Date: November 9, 2004
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection
with the Quarterly Report of Escalade, Incorporated (the Company) on Form
10-Q for the period ending July 11, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Deborah Meinert,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,
as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)     The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)     The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

|                         | 
|------------------------ | 
|/s/ Deborah
 Meinert     | 
|                         | 
|Chief
 Financial Officer | 
|August 10,
 2009         | 

---
### §2259. Market-inspection certificates as prima facie evidence

Market-inspection certificates issued by authorized agents of the Department of Agriculture shall be received in all courts of the United States as prima facie evidence of the truth of the statements therein contained.

(Sept. 21, 1944, ch. 412, title IV, §401(c), 58 Stat. 738.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

This section was enacted as part of the Department of Agriculture Organic Act of 1944.

Section was formerly classified to section 575 of Title 5 prior to the general revision and enactment of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees, by Pub. L. 89–554, §1, Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 378.
UNITED STATESSECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSIONWashington, D.C. 20549

FORM 6-K

REPORT OF FOREIGN ISSUERPURSUANT TO RULE 13a-16 OR 15d-16 OFTHE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934For the month of March 2006(Commission File No. 1-14728)

Lan Airlines S.A.(Translation of registrant's name in English)Presidente Riesco 5711, piso 20Las Condes,Santiago, Chile(Address of Principal Executive Offices)

(Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual 
  reports under cover of Form 20-F or Form 40-F.)

Form 20-F **X**Form 40-F _____

(Indicate by check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the 
  information contained in this form is also thereby furnishing the
  information to the Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the
  Securities Exchange Act of 1934.)

Yes __ No **X**

---





March 28, 2006.

|On March 28, 2006, Lan Airlines, S.A. announced that its board of directors authorized the acquisition of three Boeing 767-300 airplanes to be delivered during 2007 and 2008. The total amount of this investment will be approximately U.S.$270 million. These acquisitions are in addition to the twelve other acquisitions disclosed in August 2005.
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



---





SIGNATURE



Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.



Date: March 30, 2006





| | Lan Airlines S.A.                                                                   
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | /s/Alejandro de la Fuente GoicBy: Alejandro de la Fuente GoicChief Financial Officer
### §7533. Effect on other statutes

This subchapter does not impair the powers vested in the Atomic Energy Commission by chapter 23 of title 42, or the requirement in section 2201(d) of title 42 that adequate provision be made for administrative review of a determination to dismiss an employee of the Atomic Energy Commission.

(Pub. L. 89–554, Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 529.)

| Derivation | U.S. Code | Revised Statutes and Statutes at Large |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | 5 U.S.C. 22–2. | Aug. 26, 1950, ch. 803, §2, 64 Stat. 477. |

Statutes at Large

Standard changes are made to conform with the definitions applicable and the style of this title as outlined in the preface to the report.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Transfer of Functions

Atomic Energy Commission abolished and functions transferred by sections 5814 and 5841 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare. See, also, Transfer of Functions notes set out under those sections.