alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Regulatory Evaluation

Complete when issuing a supplemental NPRM, revision, or supersedure.

 ⁭ No Change from existing AD action

Docket No. FAA-2008-0619 Directorate Identifier: 2007-NM-356-AD

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If 

they do not, click (or Tab) into and then out of the changed cell.

Estimated Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Do not include oncondition costs here

Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

propeller, appliance)

Work-hours

(include 

access, testing, 

and close-up)

Labor 

cost 

(@$85/h

our)

Parts Cost Total Costs 

(labor + 

parts)

Number of 

U.S. 

Registered

Products

Total Cost 

for U.S. Fleet

Operation check on 

all 4 engines 12.0

$1,020.0

0

$0 $1,020.00 166 $169,320

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

The known number of products in compliance:

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $169,320

Costs covered under warranty (if known) $0

Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table that 

was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs):

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? 

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No answer.

YES NO 

Explanation: 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES* NO 

*Explanation:
### §2209h. Reimbursement of Office of the General Counsel

On and after November 10, 2005, agencies and offices of the Department of Agriculture may utilize any unobligated salaries and expenses funds to reimburse the Office of the General Counsel for salaries and expenses of personnel, and for other related expenses, incurred in representing such agencies and offices in the resolution of complaints by employees or applicants for employment, and in cases and other matters pending before the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, the Federal Labor Relations Authority, or the Merit Systems Protection Board with the prior approval of the Committees on Appropriations of both Houses of Congress.

(Pub. L. 109–97, title VII, §732, Nov. 10, 2005, 119 Stat. 2154.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in the following prior appropriation acts:

Pub. L. 108–447, div. A, title VII, §736, Dec. 8, 2004, 118 Stat. 2844.

Pub. L. 108–199, div. A, title VII, §732, Jan. 23, 2004, 118 Stat. 35.

Pub. L. 108–7, div. A, title VII, §739, Feb. 20, 2003, 117 Stat. 43.
## In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth
No. 02

- 21

- 00143

- CR No

. 02

- 21

- 00144

- CR

On Appeal from the 396th District Court Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 1523899D, 1523904D

ABATEMENT ORDER We have considered “Adam L. Arrington’s Motion for Leave to Withdraw as Attorney of Record.”
The motion is GRANTED . The Hon. Ad am L. Arrington is permitted to withdraw as counsel for appellant. We abate this appeal and remand this case to the trial court to appoint substitute appellate counsel and take any other measures that the trial court deems necessary to ensure that appella nt does not forfeit his right to appeal.



### R ODRICK 

### D ESHION 

### S TEELE 

### J R


### . , Appellant

V


### . T HE 

### S TATE OF 

### T EXAS2

The trial court shall file a supplemental clerk’s record containing the order appointing substitute appellate counsel on or before May 31, 2022 . Upon our receipt of the supplemental clerk’s record, the appeal of th is cause shall be automatically reinstated without further order. We direct the clerk of this court to send a notice of this order to the appellant, the Hon. Adam L. Arrington, the State’s attorney of record, the trial court judge, the trial court clerk, and the court reporter. Dated April 28, 2022

.
Per Curiam
### §231. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act July 22, 1942, ch. 516, 56 Stat. 689, was from the Department of Agriculture Appropriation Act, 1943, and provided for fees for inspection of brands appearing upon livestock. See section 217a of this title. Similar provisions were contained in the following prior appropriation acts:

July 1, 1941, ch. 267, 55 Stat. 432.

June 25, 1940, ch. 421, 54 Stat. 557.

June 30, 1939, ch. 253, title I, 53 Stat. 970.

June 16, 1938, ch. 464, title I, 52 Stat. 721.

June 29, 1937, ch. 404, 50 Stat. 406.

June 4, 1936, ch. 489, 49 Stat. 1432.

May 17, 1935, ch. 131, title I, 49 Stat. 257.

Mar. 26, 1934, ch. 89, 48 Stat. 477.

Mar. 3, 1933, ch. 203, 47 Stat. 1441.

July 7, 1932, ch. 443, 47 Stat. 620.

Feb. 23, 1931, ch. 278, 46 Stat. 1252.

May 27, 1930, ch. 341, 46 Stat. 402.

Feb. 16, 1929, ch. 227, 45 Stat. 1198.
Appeal No. 75-82.

#### Abraham Badway *v.*Anthony Salvato.

*Joseph A. Bevilacqua, Anthony DeSimone,*for appellant. *Higgins, Cavanagh & Cooney, Kenneth P. Borden,*for -appellee.

Motion of the appellee to dismiss the appeal is granted unless appellant files his brief within 30 days from the date of this order.
#### Westchester Federal Savings and Loan Association *v.*Hyde Park Company et al.

*Melvin L.*Bloomenthal, for the appellantsappellees (defendants Singer et al.).

*William M. Ivler,*for the appellee-appellant (defendant Hyde Park Company).

Argued February 4

decided February 4, 1975

Upon stipulation of the parties, it is ordered that the appeal of the defendants Henry A. Singer et al. dated October 31, 1974, having been withdrawn, the defendant Hyde Park Company, on or before February 20, 1975, withdraw its appeal dated November 21, 1974, leaving as the record on appeal here only the appeal of the defendants Singer et al. dated November 29, 1974, and filed December 2, 1974, and the cross appeal of the defendant Hyde Park Company dated and filed December 11, 1974.
### §443. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 443 was editorially reclassified as section 667f–1 of Title 16, Conservation.
Case: 3:11-cv-50382 Document #: 82 Filed: 05/24/13 Page 1 of 7 PageID #:238
Case: 3:11-cv-50382 Document #: 82 Filed: 05/24/13 Page 2 of 7 PageID #:239
Case: 3:11-cv-50382 Document #: 82 Filed: 05/24/13 Page 3 of 7 PageID #:240
Case: 3:11-cv-50382 Document #: 82 Filed: 05/24/13 Page 4 of 7 PageID #:241
Case: 3:11-cv-50382 Document #: 82 Filed: 05/24/13 Page 5 of 7 PageID #:242
Case: 3:11-cv-50382 Document #: 82 Filed: 05/24/13 Page 6 of 7 PageID #:243
Case: 3:11-cv-50382 Document #: 82 Filed: 05/24/13 Page 7 of 7 PageID #:244
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>

     This Schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the
Form 10-KSB of Kent  Financial  Services,  Inc. for the year ended  December 31,
1997 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>


<CIK>                              0000316028
<NAME>                             KENT FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                       1000

<S>                                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                               JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                 DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                        6,768
<SECURITIES>                                  5,691
<RECEIVABLES>                                   216
<ALLOWANCES>                                      0
<INVENTORY>                                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             12,675
<PP&E>                                        1,677
<DEPRECIATION>                                  422
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               14,203
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         2,089
<BONDS>                                           0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<COMMON>                                        101
<OTHER-SE>                                   12,013
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 14,203
<SALES>                                           0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              3,187
<CGS>                                             0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              4,395
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               45
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (1,253)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (103)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (1,150)
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (1,150)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 (1.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (1.12)



</TABLE>
#### PEOPLE ex rel. LEHMAIER, Appellant, v. INTERURBAN ST. RY. CO., Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

November 6, 1903.)

Proceeding by the people, on the relation of James S. Lehmaier, against the Interurban Street Railway Company.

No opinion. Motion denied, with. $10 costs.
### §2504. Interfering plant variety protection

(a) The owner of a certificate of plant variety protection may have relief against another owner of a certificate of the same variety by civil action, and the court may adjudge the question of validity of the respective certificates, or the ownership of the certificate.

(b) Such suit may be instituted against the party in interest as shown by the record of the Plant Variety Protection Office at the time of the decision complained of, but any party in interest may become a party to the action. If there be adverse parties residing in a plurality of districts not embraced within the same State, or an adverse party residing in a foreign country, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, or any United States district court to which it may transfer the case, shall have jurisdiction and may issue summons against the adverse parties directed to the marshall of any district in which any adverse party resides. Summons against adverse parties residing in foreign countries may be served by publication or otherwise as the court directs. The Secretary shall not be made a party but the Secretary shall have the right to intervene. Judgment of the court in favor of the right of an applicant to plant variety protection shall authorize the Secretary to issue a certificate of plant variety protection on the filing in the Plant Variety Protection Office of a certified copy of the judgment and on compliance with the requirements of this chapter.

(Pub. L. 91–577, title II, §92, formerly §94, Dec. 24, 1970, 84 Stat. 1553; renumbered §92 and amended Pub. L. 103–349, §§8(b), (c)(1), 13(p), Oct. 6, 1994, 108 Stat. 3140, 3144.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

The text of subsec. (b) of section 2463 of this title, which was transferred to subsec. (b) of this section by Pub. L. 103–349, §8(c)(1), was based on section 73(b) of Pub. L. 91–577, title II, Dec. 24, 1970, 84 Stat. 1550.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 92 of Pub. L. 91–577 was classified to section 2502 of this title prior to repeal by Pub. L. 103–349.

#### Amendments

1994—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 103–349, §8(b)(2), designated existing provisions as subsec. (a) and struck out at end "The provisions of section 2463(b) of this title shall apply to actions brought under this section."

Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 103–349, §§8(c)(1), 13(p), transferred subsec. (b) of section 2463 of this title to subsec. (b) of this section, and substituted "the Secretary" for "he" before "shall have" in fourth sentence. See Codification note above.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1994 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 103–349 effective 180 days after Oct. 6, 1994, see section 15 of Pub. L. 103–349, set out as a note under section 2401 of this title.
#### 1.700 Scope of subpart.

This subpart prescribes general policies and procedures for the use of determinations and findings (D&F's). Requirements for specific types of D&F's can be found with the appropriate subject matter.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                          CONSENT OF GRANT THORNTON LLP


               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


We have issued our report dated March 23, 2001, accompanying the consolidated
financial statements included in the 2000 Annual Report of TeraForce Technology
Corporation on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000. We hereby consent
to the incorporation by reference of said report in the following registration
statements:

     Form S-3, File No. 333-34856, filed April 14, 2000;
     Form S-3, File No. 333-30212, filed February 11, 2000;
     Form S-8, File No. 333-86099, filed August 30, 1999;
     Form S-8, File No. 333-86097, filed August 30, 1999;
     Form S-3, File No. 333-86095, filed August 27, 1999;
     Form S-8, File No. 333-75651, filed April 2, 1999;
     Form S-8, File No. 333-61333, filed August 13, 1998;
     Form S-3, File No. 333-53451, filed May 22, 1998;
     Form S-3, File No. 333-49379, filed April 2, 1998;
     Form S-8, File No. 333-03246, filed January 2, 1998;
     Form S-3, File No. 333-35841, filed December 30, 1997; and
     Form S-8, File No. 333-05918, filed December 23, 1997.



/s/ Grant Thornton LLP

Dallas, Texas
March 23, 2001
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-6685
MARK ULYSSES KNIGHTNOR, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MR. BARTOS, Shift Supervisor; MR. DAVIS, Senior Officer; CCA, corporation providing services, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge. (CA-03-260-2) Submitted: July 24, 2003 Decided: July 31, 2003 Before MICHAEL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Mark Ulysses Knightnor, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Mark Ulysses Knightnor appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. SeeKnightnor v. Bartos , No. CA-03-260-2 (E.D. Va. Apr. 21, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
### §4318. Separability

If any provision of this chapter or the application thereof to any person or circumstances is held invalid, the validity of the remainder of this chapter and of the application of such provision to other persons and circumstances shall not be affected thereby.

(Pub. L. 97–98, title XVII, §1719, Dec. 22, 1981, 95 Stat. 1358.)
|   | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                      |   |                                      |
|---------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------|
|                      |   |                                      |   |
| Date: July 14, 2010  | By:    | /s/ David Wolfin                          |   |
|                      |   | David Wolfin, Principal Executive Officer |   |
|                      |   |                                      |   |
#### § 37.1250 Commercial firm.

A for-profit firm or segment of a for-profit firm (*e.g.,* a division or other business unit) that does a substantial portion of its business in the commercial marketplace.
Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The
Board of Directors
EXCO Resources, Inc.:

We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-132551, No. 333-133481, and
333-146376) and on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-142361 and 333-145885) of EXCO Resources, Inc. and subsidiaries of our reports dated
February 27, 2008, with respect to the consolidated balance sheet of EXCO Resources, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, shareholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2007, and the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2007, which reports appear in the December 31, 2007 annual report on Form 10-K of EXCO Resources, Inc.

| |  | /s/ KPMG LLP
| |  | ------------

Dallas,
Texas
February 27, 2008

---



QuickLinks
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

THE SECRETARY

MEMORANDUM

TO: The Assistant Secretary for Special Education

 and Rehabilitative Services

FROM: The Secretary

SUBJECT: Delegation of Authority

I. DELEGATION

Under the authority vested in me by Section 412 of the Department of Education 

Organization Act, 20 U.S.C. § 3472, and in accordance with Part (a) of Section 501 of the 

Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended (P.L. 105-220), I hereby designate you and delegate 

to you, and to anyone serving for you in an acting capacity, the authority to represent the 

Secretary of the Department of Education as a member of the Interagency Committee on 

Employees who are Individuals with Disabilities. In this capacity, the Assistant Secretary for 

Special Education and Rehabilitative Services is authorized to exercise such authorities as are 

formally set forth in Part (a) of Section 501 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended.

Unless otherwise noted in future delegations of authority, amendments to the authority 

delegated herein are included within the scope of this delegation.

II. RESERVATIONS

None.

III. REDELEGATION

This authority may not be redelegated.

IV. CERTIFICATION AND EFFECTIVE DATE

This delegation is effective upon certification by the Department’s Principal Delegation 

Control Officer and it supersedes delegation control EA/EH/37.

____________/s/______________ 

 Margaret Spellings

OGC Clearance and Date: /s/ David Berthiaume, 5/11/2007

Certified Date: 5/22/2007

Departmental Delegations Control Officer: /s/ Naty G. Beetle

Control Number: EA/EH/89
### §6303. Issuance and amendment of orders

#### (a) In general

To effectuate the declared policy of section 6301(b) of this title, the Secretary, subject to the procedures provided in subsection (b), shall issue orders under this chapter applicable to producers and first purchasers of soybeans. Any such order shall be national in scope, and not more than one order shall be in effect under this chapter at any one time.

#### (b) Procedure

#### (1) Proposal or request for issuance

The Secretary may propose the issuance of an order under this chapter, or an association of soybean producers or any other person that would be affected by an order issued pursuant to this chapter may request the issuance of, and submit a proposal for, such an order.

#### (2) Notice and comment concerning proposed order

Not later than 30 days after the receipt of a request and proposal for an order pursuant to paragraph (1), or whenever the Secretary determines to propose an order, the Secretary shall publish a proposed order and give due notice and opportunity for public comment on the proposed order.

#### (3) Issuance of order

After notice and opportunity for public comment are given as provided in paragraph (2), the Secretary shall issue an order, taking into consideration the comments received and including in the order provisions necessary to ensure that the order is in conformity with the requirements under this chapter. Such order shall be issued and become effective not later than 180 days following publication of the proposed order.

#### (c) Amendments

The Secretary, from time to time, may amend any order issued under this section. The provisions of this chapter applicable to orders shall be applicable to amendments to orders.

(Pub. L. 101–624, title XIX, §1968, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 3883.)
#### 1.402 Policy.

Unless precluded by law, executive order, or regulation, deviations from the FAR may be granted as specified in this subpart when necessary to meet the specific needs and requirements of each agency. The development and testing of new techniques and methods of acquisition should not be stifled simply because such action would require a FAR deviation. The fact that deviation authority is required should not, of itself, deter agencies in their development and testing of new techniques and acquisition methods. Refer to 31.101 for instructions concerning deviations pertaining to the subject matter of part 31, Contract Cost Principles and Procedures. Deviations are not authorized with respect to 30.201-3 and 30.201-4, or the requirements of the Cost Accounting Standards Board (CASB) rules and regulations (48 CFR chapter 99). Refer to 30.201-5 for instructions concerning waivers pertaining to Cost Accounting Standards.

[48 FR 42103, Sept. 19, 1983, as amended at 52 FR 35612, Sept. 22, 1987; 62 FR 64914, Dec. 9, 1997; 85 FR 67614, Oct. 23, 2020]