alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §5856. Improvements to United States Drought Monitor

#### (a) In general

The Secretary shall coordinate with the Director of the National Drought Mitigation Center and the Administrator of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration to enhance the collection of data to improve the accuracy of the United States Drought Monitor.

#### (b) Utilization

To the maximum extent practicable, the Secretary shall utilize a consistent source or sources of data for programs that are based on drought or precipitation indices, such as the livestock forage disaster program established under section 9081(c) of this title or policies or plans of insurance established under the Federal Crop Insurance Act (7 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.).

#### (c) Review

Not later than 1 year after December 20, 2018, the Secretary shall conduct a review of—

(1) the types of data currently utilized by the United States Drought Monitor;

(2) the geographic coverage and density of existing data collection sites; and

(3) other meteorological or climatological data that is being collected by other Federal agencies, State and local governments, and non-Federal entities that could be utilized by the United States Drought Monitor.

#### (d) Improvements

#### (1) In general

Upon the completion of the review prescribed in subsection (c), the Secretary shall—

(A) seek to expand the collection of relevant data in States or geographic areas where coverage is currently lacking as compared to other States or geographic areas; and

(B) to the maximum extent practicable, develop standards to allow the integration of meteorological or climatological data into the United States Drought Monitor derived from—

(i) in-situ soil moisture profile measuring devices;

(ii) citizen science (as defined in the Crowdsourcing and Citizen Science Act (15 U.S.C. 3724)), including data from the Cooperative Observer Program of the National Weather Service; and

(iii) other Federal agencies, State and local governments, and non-Federal entities.

#### (2) Authorization of appropriations

There is to be authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary to carry out this subsection $5,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2019 through 2023.

(Pub. L. 115–334, title XII, §12512, Dec. 20, 2018, 132 Stat. 4995.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Federal Crop Insurance Act, referred to in subsec. (b), is subtitle A of title V of act Feb. 16, 1938, ch. 30, 52 Stat. 72, which is classified generally to subchapter I (§1501 et seq.) of chapter 36 of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 1501 of this title and Tables.

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Agriculture Improvement Act of 2018, and not as part of subtitle C of title XVI of the Food, Agriculture, Conservation, and Trade Act of 1990 which comprises this subchapter.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Definition of "Secretary"

"Secretary" means the Secretary of Agriculture, see section 2 of Pub. L. 115–334, set out as a note under section 9001 of this title.
1

Hutson, Nick

From: Hutson, Nick

Sent: Friday, July 31, 2015 4:57 PM

To: Frey, Nathan J.

Cc: Fruh, Steve; Culligan, Kevin; 'Szabo, Aaron'

Subject: 111(b) preamble/rule and RIA

Attachments: 111b preamble_FINAL_DRAFT_073115_cleandocx.docx; 111b preamble_RLSO_compare_

073015_to_073115.docx; 111b preamble_RLSO_compare_050715_to_073115.docx; EO 

12866_111(b) New-Mods 2060-AQ91 RIA Final_07312015.docx

Nathan – 

Please find attached 4 files: 

1. A clean version of the current 111(b) preamble and rule that we believes is responsive to EO12866 interagency 

review 

2. A RLSO version that shows changes compared to the version that I sent you yesterday 

3. A RLSO version that shows all change compared to the original submission on 05/07/15 

4. The 111(b) RIA – there are no changes to the most recent version that was submitted 

Please let me know if there are any additional issues that we need to resolve. 

I am editing the 3 TSDs now and responding to comments. I will send you updated versions within the next hour. 

Regards, 

Nick 

Nick Hutson, PhD 

Energy Strategies Group 

Office of Air & Radiation 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 

tel: +1 919 541 2968 

email: hutson.nick@epa.gov
Appendix 

### I. Categories of Acute Toxicity In general, categories of acute toxicity ranging from "practically nontoxic" to "very highly toxic7' have been established for aquatic organisms (based on LCrovalues), for terrestrial mammals and avian species (based on LCsoand/or LDsO values), and for nontarget insects (based on LDrO values for honey bees) (EPA 2001). Categories of acute toxicity for aquatic organisms can be classified accordingto the toxicityreference value (LC5o)given by a study:

Categories of acute toxicity for mammalian and avian species can be classified according to the toxicity reference value (LC5o or LDro)given by a study:

The following toxicity category descriptionswere developedby Atkins (1981) and have been used by EFED to characterizehoney bee acute contact toxicity values (EPA, 2001):

Works Cited: Atkins, EL; Kellum, 

### D; and Atkins, 

### KW. 1981. Reducingpesticide hazards to honey bees: mortality prediction techniques and integrated management strategies. University of California, Division of Agricultural Sciences, Leaflet 2883,23 pp 

### U.S. EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 2001. Ecological Risk Assessor Orientation Package. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Ecological Fate and Effects Division. Draft Version, August 200 1.
### §2159. Authority to apply for injunctions

#### (a) Request

Whenever the Secretary has reason to believe that any dealer, carrier, exhibitor, or intermediate handler is dealing in stolen animals, or is placing the health of any animal in serious danger in violation of this chapter or the regulations or standards promulgated thereunder, the Secretary shall notify the Attorney General, who may apply to the United States district court in which such dealer, carrier, exhibitor, or intermediate handler resides or conducts business for a temporary restraining order or injunction to prevent any such person from operating in violation of this chapter or the regulations and standards prescribed under this chapter.

#### (b) Issuance

The court shall, upon a proper showing, issue a temporary restraining order or injunction under subsection (a) without bond. Such injunction or order shall remain in effect until a complaint pursuant to section 2149 of this title is issued and dismissed by the Secretary or until an order to cease and desist made thereon by the Secretary has become final and effective or is set aside on appellate review. Attorneys of the Department of Agriculture may, with the approval of the Attorney General, appear in the United States district court representing the Secretary in any action brought under this section.

(Pub. L. 89–544, §29, as added Pub. L. 101–624, title XXV, §2503(2), Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 4067.)
§ 635.2 Safeguarding official information. ( a ) Military police records are unclassified except when they contain national security information as defined in AR 380-5 (Available at *http://www.apd.army.mil/pdffiles/r380_5.pdf*), Department of the Army Information Security Program.
( b ) Military police records will also be released to Federal, state, local or foreign law enforcement agencies as prescribed by 32 CFR part 505, The Army Privacy Program. Expanded markings will be applied to these records.
#### § 989.25 Base closure and realignment.

Base closure or realignment may entail special requirements for environmental analysis. The permanent base closure and realignment law, 10 U.S.C. 2687, requires a report to the Congress when an installation where at least 300 DoD civilian personnel are authorized to be employed is closed, or when a realignment reduces such an installation by at least 50 percent or 1,000 of such personnel, whichever is less. In addition, other base closure laws may be in effect during particular periods. Such nonpermanent closure laws frequently contain provisions limiting the extent of environmental analysis required for actions taken under them. Such provisions may also add requirements for studies not necessarily required by NEPA.
#### BRADY v. N.C. BD. OF DENTAL EXAMINERS

No. 398A97

Case below: 126 N.C.App. 829

Petition by petitioner (Brady) for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 and Appellate Rule 16(b) as to issues in addition to those presented as the basis for the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals denied 2 October 1997.
### §511o. Separability

If any provision of this chapter or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the validity of the remainder of the chapter and of the application of such provision to other persons and circumstances shall not be affected thereby.

(Aug. 23, 1935, ch. 623, §16, 49 Stat. 735.)
#### Meridian Trading Corp., Appellant, v. Carlton Credit Corporation, Respondent.

Order, entered on July 9, 1963, denying plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, unanimously modified, on the law, the facts and in the exercise of discretion, and plaintiff’s motion granted to the extent of dismissing the defendant’s “third defense and first counterclaim”, and, as so modified, the order is affirmed, without costs. Triable issues of fact exist which require a denial of plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment except as to the “third defense and first counterclaim.” The defendant there alleges that the plaintiff received in excess of $17,000 in the course of a chapter XI proceeding involving the Denton Steamship Corp., and that by reason of a certificate of indebtedness executed in its favor, defendant is entitled to such funds. In the affidavits submitted by plaintiff in support of its motion, it is averred unequivocally that such funds were never received. In its reply affidavit, defendant’s president states that he was informed by plaintiff’s general manager and another that plaintiff had received the moneys in question. In the face of the clear and unequivocal denials by the plaintiff’s fiscal officer that such funds were ever received, the mere averment of defendant’s president that he had been informed to the contrary, completely unsupported by any evidentiary specification, is insufficient to withstand the attack of summary judgment. Concur — Rabin, J. P., McNally, Stevens, Eager and Staley, JJ.
# United States Court of Appeals **for the Fifth Circuit**

No. 22-50002 Summary Calendar

Thirplus Timo Moose,

Petitioner—Appellant ,

versus

FNU LNU, Warden of Bastrop and/or Title Holder , Respondent—Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 1:21-CV-891

Before Jones, Haynes, and Oldham, Circuit Judges

. Per Curiam: *
Thirplus Timo Moose, federal prison er # 21011-045, was convicted of conspiracy to commit bank robbery, armed bank robbery with forcible restraint, and use or discharge of a fi rearm during a crime of violence causing murder. He now appeals the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition, in which

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED September 27, 2022
Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 22-50002 Document: 00516486508 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/27/2022No. 22-50002

2 he asserted he should be released i mmediately on the basis of a purported novation agreement he sent the Government, which, among other things, deemed his term of imprisonment satisfied. According to Moose, the Government assented to the novation by failing to reject it. Additionally, Moose seeks leave to file a supplemental brief.
“In an appeal from the denial of habeas relief, this court reviews a district court’s findings of fact for clear error and issues of law de novo.” Jeffers v. Chandler , 253 F.3d 827, 830 (5th Cir. 2 001). This court “may affirm
the district court’s denial of relief on any ground supported by the record.”
Hunter v. Tamez , 622 F.3d 427, 430 (5th Cir. 2010). Here, Moose attempts to unilaterally change the terms of his plea agreement and sentence to obtain immediate release and asserts that the Government has agreed to this novation by its silence. This contention is without merit.
The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED . Moose’s motion for leave to file a supplemental brief in support is DENIED

. Case: 22-50002 Document: 00516486508 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/27/2022
§ 750.54 Payment of costs, settlements, and judgments related to certain medical or legal malpractice claims. ( a ) *General.* Requests for reimbursement/indemnification of costs, settlements, and judgments cognizable under 10 U.S.C. 1089(f) [for personal injury or death caused by any physician, dentist, nurse, pharmacist, paramedic, or other supporting personnel (including medical and dental technicians, nurse assistants, and therapists)] or 10 U.S.C. 1054(f) (for damages for injury or loss of property caused by any attorney, paralegal, or other member of a legal staff) while acting as DON personnel will be paid if: ( 1 ) The alleged negligent or wrongful actions or omissions arose in connection with either providing health care functions or legal services and within the scope of employment; and
( 2 ) Such personnel furnish prompt notification and delivery of all process served or received, and other documents, information, and assistance as requested; and cooperate in defending the action on the merits.
( b ) *Requests for Indemnification.* All requests for indemnification for personal liability of DON personnel for acts or omissions arising out of assigned duties shall be forwarded to the Judge Advocate General for action.
4 Attachments

Flare height - 25'

Flare tip - 3" or 4"

Enclosed Combustors - This is all the information t hat I have on them.

If you need anything else, please let me know.

Thanks,

John McMichael Environmental Engineer XTO Energy, Inc

810 Houston St.
Ft Worth, TX 76102

Office # 817.885.3782

Cell # 817.584.7588

Ft. Berthold Information Request

John_McMichael

to:

Eric Wortman

05/24/2012 12:29 PM

Hide Details From: John_McMichael@xtoenergy.com

To: Eric Wortman/R8/USEPA/US@EPA

History: This message has been forwarded.

ECD description.pdf APT CIM1067 Final Report.pdf APT Cert 24 48.pdf APT Cert 30.pdf 

### Page 1 of 1

7/13/2012 file://C:\Documents and Settings\ewortman\Local Set tings\Temp\notes0BDDB2\~web560

...
§ 34.3 Deviations. ( a ) *Individual deviations.* Individual deviations affecting only one award may be approved by DoD Components in accordance with procedures stated in 32 CFR 21.335(a) and 21.340.
( b ) *Small awards.* DoD Components may apply less restrictive requirements than the provisions of this part when awarding small awards, except for those requirements which are statutory.
( c ) *Other class deviations.* For classes of awards other than small awards, the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering, or his or her designee, may grant exceptions from the requirements of this part when exceptions are not prohibited by statute. DoD Components shall request approval for such deviations in accordance with 32 CFR 21.335 (b) and 21.340.
[63 FR 12204, Mar. 12, 1998, as amended at 68 FR 47160, Aug. 7, 2003; 85 FR 51244, Aug. 19, 2020]
#### JONES *vs.*HOLLAND.

[attachment to becover rent.]

*Attachment; error to render judgment before maturity of debt.*— -In a shit against a tenant to recover rent, commenced by attachment, it is error . to render judgment against the defendant before the rent is due.

Appeal Rom the Circuit Court of Henry.

Tried before Hon. J. McCaleb Wiley.

Appellee commenced suit by attachment on the 18th' day of September, 1869, to recover Rom his tenant the amount due for rent, which it is shown in the affidavit for attachment was payable on the 1st day of November, 1869. On the 21st day of October, 1869, a proper complaint having been filed before that time, judgment by default was rendered against defendant, the tenant of appellee. This appeal is taken on the record, and it is now assigned as error that the. judgment was rendered before the debt was due.

W. C. Oates, for appellant.

M. A. Bell, *contra.*

[Note by Reporter. — The opinion in this case Was delivered at the June term, 1871, and the report of it was omitted from the previous volume on account of a want of space.]

B. F. SAFFOLD. J.

The suit was commenced by attachment, and was for the recovery of the rent of land due, as stated in the affidavit, on the 1st of November, 1869. The judgment by default was obtained October 21,1869.

An attachment may issue to enforce the collection of a debt not due, but the complaint is not required to be filed until the maturity of the debt. — Rev. Code, §§ 2927, 2999. There is no authority for rendering judgment against the defendant until the debt is due.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.
Exhibit 23.2




CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM




We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-134316, 333-117489, 33-53589, 2-94436, 333-57608, 333-57575, 333-46901, 333-41363, 333-65265, 333-41904, 333-37308, 333-70560 and 33-63958) of International Rectifier Corporation of our report dated September 15, 2008, except with respect to our opinion on the consolidated financial statements insofar as it relates to the effects of the change in accounting principle for patent-related costs discussed in Note 1 and the change in reportable segments discussed in Note 9 to the consolidated financial statements included in the 2009 Form 10-K filed on August 27, 2009 (not separately presented herein), as to which the date is August 26, 2009, and the change in reportable segments discussed in Note 9 and the revision discussed in Note 2 to these consolidated financial statements as to which the date is August 24, 2010, relating to the financial statements and financial statement schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K.








/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP


Los Angeles, California


August 26, 2010
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

March 5, 2019

t0225 

# Order

Clerk March 5, 2019

157834 & (18)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 157834

COA: 340881

Ottawa CC: 13

- 037693

- FC

JOSHUA LEE MOSHER,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 13, 2018 order

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). The

motion to amend is DENIED with respect to the defendant’s request to amend the motion

filed in the Ottawa Circuit Court, but is GRANTED with respect to the citation of

additional authority in the defendant’s application filed in this Court.
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

About EDOVERVIEW

*Note:  These Congressional Budget Justifications do not include State tables. For the latest State tables, please visit the Department's State Tables page*.Volume I- ESEA Overview  PDF (78KB) 
- Accelerating Achievement and Ensuring Equity  PDF (1.4MB) 
- School Readiness  PDF (1.4MB) 
- Impact Aid   PDF (1.2MB)
- Education Improvement Programs  PDF (2.0MB)
- Supporting Student Success  PDF (2.0MB)
- Indian Student Education  PDF (1.2MB)  ****)
- Innovation and Instructional Teams  PDF (1.9MB)
- English Learner Education  PDF (622KB)
- Special Education  PDF (1.6MB)
- Rehabilitation Services and Disability Research  PDF (1.9MB)
Volume II- American Printing House for the Blind  PDF (73KB)
- National Technical Institute for the Deaf  PDF (172KB)
- Gallaudet University  PDF (228KB)
- Career, Technical, and Adult Education  PDF (1.4MB)
- Student Aid Overview  PDF (232KB)
- Student Financial Assistance  PDF (1.8MB)
- Teacher Education Assistance Overview  PDF (1.0MB)
- Student Loans Overview  PDF (1.2MB)
- Higher Education  PDF (2.7MB)
- Howard University  PDF (222KB)
- College Housing and Academic Facilities Loans Program Account  PDF (162KB)
- Historically Black College and University Capital Financing Program Account  PDF (301KB)
- Institute of Education Sciences  PDF (675KB)
- Salaries and Expenses Overview  PDF (553KB)
- Program Administration  PDF (1.4MB)
- Student Aid Administration  PDF (1.4MB)
- Office for Civil Rights  PDF (474KB)
- Office of the Inspector General  PDF (343KB)
 Printable view
  Last Modified: 04/10/2013
How Do I Find...- Student loans, forgiveness
- College accreditation
- Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
- FERPA
- FAFSA
- 1098, tax forms

More >
Information About...- Transforming Teaching
- Family and Community Engagement
- Early Learning

 
President's Education Budget RequestBudget TablesBudget NewsED Budget Process and Calendar
*Our mission* is to promote student achievement and preparation for global competitiveness by fostering educational excellence and ensuring equal access.
Student Loans
Repaying LoansDefaulted LoansLoan ForgivenessLoan Servicers
Grants & Programs
Apply for Pell GrantsGrants ForecastApply for a GrantEligibility for Grants
Laws & Guidance
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)FERPACivil RightsNew IDEA Website
Data & Research
Education StatisticsPostsecondary Education DataED Data ExpressNation's Report CardWhat Works Clearinghouse
About Us
Contact UsED OfficesJobsPress ReleasesFAQsRecursos en españolBudget, PerformancePrivacy ProgramSubscribe to E-Mail Updates- Notices
- FOIA
- Privacy Policy
- Accessibility
- Security
- Information quality
- Inspector General
- Whitehouse.gov
- USA.gov
- Benefits.gov
- Regulations.gov