alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 776.85 Effect of separate proceeding. ( a ) For purposes of this section, the term “separate proceeding” includes, but is not limited to, court-martial, non-judicial punishment, administrative board, or similar civilian or military proceeding.
( b ) In cases in which a covered attorney is determined, at a separate proceeding determined by the Rules Counsel to afford procedural protection equal to that provided by a preliminary inquiry under this part, to have committed misconduct that forms the basis for ethics charges under this part, the Rules Counsel may dispense with the preliminary inquiry and proceed directly with an ethics investigation.
( c ) In those cases in which a covered attorney is determined to have committed misconduct at a separate proceeding which the Rules Counsel determines has afforded procedural protection equal to that provided by an ethics investigation under this part, the previous determination regarding the underlying misconduct is res judicata with respect to that issue during an ethics investigation. A subsequent ethics investigation based on such misconduct shall afford the covered attorney a hearing into whether the underlying misconduct constitutes a violation of subpart B of this part, whether the violation affects his or her fitness to practice law, and what sanctions, if any, are appropriate.
( d ) Notwithstanding paragraphs (b) and (c) in this section, the Rules Counsel may dispense with the preliminary inquiry and ethics investigation and, after affording the covered attorney concerned written notice and an opportunity to be heard in writing, recommend to the JAG that the covered attorney concerned be disciplined under this part when the covered attorney has been: ( 1 ) Decertified or suspended from the practice of law or otherwise subjected to professional responsibility discipline by the JAG or Chief Counsel of another Military Department;
( 2 ) Disbarred or suspended from the practice of law or otherwise subjected to professional responsibility discipline by the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces or by any Federal, State, or local bar; or
( 3 ) Convicted of a felony (or any offense punishable by one year or more of imprisonment) in a civilian or military court that, in the opinion of the Rules Counsel, renders the attorney unqualified or incapable of properly or ethically representing the DoN or a client when the Rules Counsel has determined that the attorney was afforded procedural protection equal to that provided by an ethics investigation under this part.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 151 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 151

 Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Small Business 
                in the One Hundred Eighteenth Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 21, 2023

  Mr. Williams of Texas submitted the following resolution; which was 
           referred to the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Small Business 
                in the One Hundred Eighteenth Congress.

    Resolved,

SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES.

     For the expenses of the Committee on Small Business (hereafter in 
this resolution referred to as the ``Committee''), including the 
expenses of all staff salaries, there shall be paid, out of the 
applicable accounts of the House of Representatives for committee 
salaries and expenses, not more than $7,500,000 for the One Hundred 
Eighteenth Congress.

SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS.

     Of the amount specified in section 1--
            (1) not more than $3,750,000 shall be available for 
        expenses incurred during the period beginning at noon on 
        January 3, 2023, and ending immediately before noon on January 
        3, 2024; and
            (2) not more than $3,750,000 shall be available for 
        expenses incurred during the period beginning at noon on 
        January 3, 2024, and ending immediately before noon on January 
        3, 2025.

SEC. 3. VOUCHERS.

     Payments under this resolution shall be made on vouchers 
authorized by the Committee, signed by the chairman of the Committee, 
and approved in the manner directed by the Committee on House 
Administration.

SEC. 4. REGULATIONS.

     Amounts made available under this resolution shall be expended in 
accordance with regulations prescribed by the Committee on House 
Administration.
                                 <all>
```
### §4208. Limitations

(a) This chapter does not authorize the Federal Government in any way to regulate the use of private or non-Federal land, or in any way affect the property rights of owners of such land.

(b) None of the provisions or other requirements of this chapter shall apply to the acquisition or use of farmland for national defense purposes during a national emergency.

(Pub. L. 97–98, title XV, §1547, Dec. 22, 1981, 95 Stat. 1344; Pub. L. 101–624, title XXV, §2502, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 4066.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1990—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 101–624 inserted before period at end "during a national emergency".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective six months after Dec. 22, 1981, see section 1549 of Pub. L. 97–98, set out as a note under section 4201 of this title.
### §2225d. Availability of Department of Agriculture funds for temporary employment

On and after November 10, 2005, funds appropriated by this or any other Appropriations Act to the Department of Agriculture (excluding the Forest Service) shall be available for employment pursuant to the second sentence of section 2225 of this title and section 3109 of title 5.

(Pub. L. 109–97, title VII, §703, Nov. 10, 2005, 119 Stat. 2149.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in the following prior appropriation acts:

Pub. L. 108–447, div. A, title VII, §703, Dec. 8, 2004, 118 Stat. 2838.

Pub. L. 108–199, div. A, title VII, §703, Jan. 23, 2004, 118 Stat. 31.

Pub. L. 108–7, div. A, title VII, §703, Feb. 20, 2003, 117 Stat. 38.
#### Laurie Grotta, an Infant, by Frank Grotta, Her Guardian ad Litem, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Duffy-Mott Company, Inc., et al., Defendants.

Motion by defendants for leave to appeal to this court from an order of the Appellate Term, denied. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Three-Five
Systems, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended June 30 2002 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Jeffrey D. Buchanan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(3)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

(4)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.

THREE-FIVE SYSTEMS, INC.


/s/ Jeffrey D. Buchanan
---------------------------------------
Jeffrey D. Buchanan
Chief Financial Officer

Date:   August 2, 2002
STAfE OF CONNECTICuT

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

State of Connecticut

and

Northeast Generation Compariy "

)

)

)

TRADrNG AGREEMENT AND ORDER NO. 8175

MODIFICATION NO. I

In the matter of a trading agreement and order between the Commissioner of Envirorunental

Protection ("Commissioner") and Northeast Generation Company ("NGC").

WHEREAS, the Commissioner and NGC, having agreed to the tenns and conditions set

forth in Trading Agreement and Order No. 8175 issued on February 1, 2000, do now, by mutual

agreement, modify said Trading Agreement and Order as follows:

1. Paragraph A 1. is deleted and the following is substituted in lieu thereof:

A.I. NGC is an exempt wholesale electric generating company with its

principal place of business in Berlin, Connecticut. On or before March

15, 2000 NGC will purchase from The Connecticut Light and Power

Company and then O'Wl1 one (1) piece offuel-buming equipment

("peaking unit") identified in Table I ofthis Trading Agreement and

Order. This peaking unit is a combustion turbine.

2. Paragraph A.2. is deleted and the followjng is substituted in lieu thereof:

A.2. On or before March 15, 2000 Northeast Generation Services Company

will operate the peaking unit identified in Table 1 of this Trading

Agreement and Order at NGC's facility.

3. Paragraph A.7. is deleted and the following is substituted in lieu thereof:

A.7.

lnitialS~

Pursuant to the Department of Environmental Protection's "Credit

Trading/or Sources with Irregular NOx Emissions" policy, with a

revised date of February 10, 2000, anached hereto and incorporated by

reference into this Trading Agreement and Order as Exhibit J. the

peaking unit has peak daily NOx emissions greater than three times the

average daily emissions during the ozone season and is therefore

considered a source with irregular NOx emissions.

Date: 3/13/2000

(Prillted 011 Recytled riper)

79 Elm Street • HUlford, CT 06106 - 5127

bap:/ld ep.51Ite. CI.1l5

A" Equa! Opportu,.i,y Employrr
Northeast Generation Company Trading Agreement and Order No. 8175

Modification No.1

All other tenns and conditions of Trading Agreement and Order No. 8175 issued by the

Commissioner acting under Chapter 446c, Sections 22a-6, 22a·171, 22a-174, 22a·176, and 22a- 177 of

the Connecticut General Statutes shall remain in effect.

Northeast Generation Company hereby consents to the entry ofthis modification to the Trading

Agreement and Order without further notice. ,

Northeast Generation Compa.Tly

Signature: ~"1!~

Type Name: Bruce D. Kenvon

Type Title: P_r_e_s_i_d_e_n_t _

Date: 3/13/2000

Entered as a modi~cation of3.]1.QJger ofthe Co /. . ioner of nvironmental Protection

numbered 8175 thIS .' a1day of_-,,-.--;r'"",c.crLt:.+---' 2000.

~~~ Arthur J. Rocque, Jr.

Commissioner

TOWN OF PRESTON

LAND RECORDS

MAILED CERTIFIED MAIL,

RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED

Certified Document No.

2
§ 811.8 Forms prescribed and availability of publications. ( a ) AF Form 833, Visual Information Request, AF Form 1340, Visual Information Support Center Workload Report, DD Form 1995, Visual Information (VI) Production Request and Report, DD Form 2054-1, Visual Information (VI) Annual Report, and DD Form 2537, Visual Information Caption Sheet are prescribed by this part.
( b ) Air Force publications and forms referenced in this part are available from NTIS, 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, VA 22161 or online at *http://www.afpubs.hq.af.mil .* DoD publications are available at *http://www.defenselink.mil/pubs .*
§ 1802.2 Definitions. For purposes of this part, the following terms have the meanings as indicated: *NACIC* means the United States National Counterintelligence Center acting through the NACIC Information and Privacy Coordinator;
*Authorized holders* means any member of any United States executive department, military department, the Congress, or the judiciary (Article III) who holds a security clearance from or has been specifically authorized by NACIC to possess and use on official business classified information, or otherwise has Constitutional authority pursuant to their office;
*Days* means calendar days when NACIC is operating and specifically excludes Saturdays, Sundays, and legal public holidays. Three (3) days may be added to any requirement of this part if responding by U.S. domestic mail; ten (10) days may be added if responding by international mail;
*Challenge* means a request in the individual's official, not personal, capacity and in furtherance of the interests of the United States;
*Control* means ownership or the authority of NACIC pursuant to federal statute or privilege to regulate official or public access to records;
*Coordinator* means the NACIC Information and Privacy Coordinator acting in the capacity of the Director of NACIC;
*Information* means any knowledge that can be communicated or documentary material, regardless of its physical form, that is: ( 1 ) Owned by, produced by or for, or under the control of the United States Government, and
( 2 ) Lawfully and actually in the possession of an authorized holder and for which ownership and control has not been relinquished by NACIC;
*Interested party* means any official in the executive, military, congressional, or judicial branches of government, United States or foreign, or U.S. Government contractor who, in the sole discretion of NACIC, has a subject matter or physical interest in the documents or information at issue;
*Originator* means the NACIC officer who originated the information at issue, or successor in office, or a NACIC officer who has been delegated declassification authority for the information at issue in accordance with the provisions of this Order;
*This Order* means Executive Order 12958 of April 17, 1995, or successor Orders.
### §1630. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act June 4, 1956, ch. 355, title V, §508, 70 Stat. 241, which provided for availability of appropriations for committee expenses in effectuating research and service work, was from the Department of Agriculture and Farm Credit Administration Appropriation Act, 1957, and was not repeated in subsequent appropriation acts. Similar provisions were contained in the following prior appropriation acts:

May 23, 1955, ch. 43, title V, §509, 69 Stat. 64.

June 29, 1954, ch. 409, title V, §509, 68 Stat. 319.
Exhibit
      32.2





CERTIFICATION
      OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY
      ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the quarterly report of Viskase Companies, Inc. (the "Company")
      on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gordon
      S. Donovan, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)
      the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      the
      information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date:
      November 14, 2006








/s/
                Gordon S. DonovanGordon
                S. DonovanVice
                President and Chief Financial Officer
**EXHIBIT 13.5**

 

**CONSENT OF EXPERT**

 

We hereby consent to the use of our name contained in the technical reports on the Property in Gold Bridge, British Columbia dated October 15, 2012 and amended on November 20, 2012 entitled “Preliminary Economic Assessment on the Bralorne Gold Mines Property, Gold Bridge, British Columbia, Canada”, and the reference as an expert contained in the Annual Report of Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014 and incorporated by reference to the Company’s Registration Statements on Form S-8 (SEC File No.: 333-195120) and Forms F-3 (SEC File Nos.: 333-193471 and 333-195144).

 

 

|                | **BEACON HILL CONSULTANTS (1988) LTD.** |                         |
|---------------------|-----------------------------------------|------------------------------|
|                |                                    |                         |   |
| Dated: May 11, 2015 | By:                                     |  */s/ W. P. Stokes***** |   |
|                |                                    | W. P. Stokes, P.Eng.         |   |
§ 516.48 Official information. ( a ) In instances involving § 516.47(a)(1), the matter will be referred to the SJA or legal adviser serving the organization of the individual whose testimony is requested, or to HQDA pursuant to § 516.47(a). The deciding official will determine whether to release the information sought under the principles established in § 516.44. If funding by the United States is requested, see § 516.55(d).
( b ) If the deciding official determines that the information may be released, the individual will be permitted to be interviewed, deposed, or to appear as a witness in court provided such interview or appearance is consistent with the requirements of §§ 516.49 and 516.50. (See, for example, figure G-2, appendix G, to this part). A JA or DA civilian attorney should be present during any interview or testimony to act as legal representative of the Army. If a question seeks information not previously authorized for release, the legal representative will advise the witness not to answer. If necessary to avoid release of the information, the legal representative will advise the witness to terminate the interview or deposition, or in the case of testimony in court, advise the judge that DOD directives and Army regulations preclude the witness from answering without HQDA approval. Every effort should be made, however, to substitute releasable information and to continue the interview or testimony.
#### § 37.1375 Technology investment agreements.

A special class of assistance instruments used to increase involvement of commercial firms in defense research programs and for other purposes (described in appendix A to this part) related to integrating the commercial and defense sectors of the nation's technology and industrial base. A technology investment agreement may be a cooperative agreement with provisions tailored for involving commercial firms (as distinct from a cooperative agreement subject to all of the requirements in 32 CFR part 34), or another kind of assistance transaction (*see* appendix B to this part).
### §1738i. Enterprise for the Americas Board

#### (a) Establishment

There is established a board to be known as the "Enterprise for the Americas Board" (hereafter referred to in this subchapter as the "Board").

#### (b) Membership and chairperson

#### (1) Membership

The Board shall be composed of—

(A) six representatives from the United States Government, at least one of whom shall be a representative of the Department of Agriculture; and

(B) five representatives from private nongovernmental environmental, child survival and child development, community development, scientific, and academic organizations with experience and expertise in Latin America and the Caribbean, at least one of whom shall be a representative from a child survival and child development organization;

to be appointed by the President.

#### (2) Chairperson

The Board shall be headed by a chairperson who shall be appointed by the President from among the representatives appointed under paragraph (1)(A).

#### (c) Responsibilities

The Board shall—

(1) advise the President on the negotiations for the environmental framework agreements described in subsections (a) and (b) of section 1738f of this title;

(2) ensure, in consultation with the government of the appropriate eligible country, with nongovernmental organizations of such eligible country, and if appropriate, of the region, and with environmental, scientific, and academic leaders of such eligible country and, as appropriate, of the region, that a suitable body referred to in section 1738f(c) of this title is identified; and

(3) review the programs, operations, and fiscal audits of the bodies referred to in section 1738f(c) of this title.

(July 10, 1954, ch. 469, title VI, §610, as added Pub. L. 101–624, title XV, §1512, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 3661; amended Pub. L. 102–237, title III, §339, Dec. 13, 1991, 105 Stat. 1861; Pub. L. 102–549, title VI, §603, Oct. 28, 1992, 106 Stat. 3669.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1992—Pub. L. 102–549, §603(1), substituted "Enterprise" for "Environment" in section catchline.

Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 102–549, §603(2), substituted "Enterprise" for "Environment".

Subsec. (b)(1)(B). Pub. L. 102–549, §603(3), inserted "child survival and child development," after "environmental," and ", at least one of whom shall be a representative from a child survival and child development organization".

1991—Subsec. (b)(1)(A). Pub. L. 102–237, §339(1), substituted "six" for "five" and inserted ", at least one of whom shall be a representative of the Department of Agriculture" after "Government".

Subsec. (b)(1)(B). Pub. L. 102–237, §339(2), substituted "five" for "four".
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6091

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

BILL W. CONARD,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Lacy H. Thornburg, District

Judge. (CR-86-A, CA-97-147-1)

Submitted: July 2, 1998 Decided: July 22, 1998

Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bill W. Conard, Appellant Pro Se. Jerry Wayne Miller, OFFICE OF THE

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying

relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998) motion

and his motion to reconsider under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60. We have

reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.

United States v. Conard, Nos. CR-86-A; CA-97-147-1 (W.D.N.C. Oct.

3, 1997, Nov. 14, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
### [§4302a. Repealed. Pub. L. 103–89, §3(b)(1)(B)(i), Sept. 30, 1993, 107 Stat. 981]

Section, added Pub. L. 98–615, title II, §202(a), Nov. 8, 1984, 98 Stat. 3214; amended Pub. L. 101–103, §5(a), Sept. 30, 1989, 103 Stat. 671; Pub. L. 102–22, §2(a), Mar. 28, 1991, 105 Stat. 71, related to the establishment of performance appraisal systems for performance management and recognition system employees.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Nov. 1, 1993, see section 3(c) of Pub. L. 103–89, set out as an Effective Date of 1993 Amendment note under section 3372 of this title.
### §2242. Repealed. Pub. L. 101–624, title XVI, §1606(b)(1), (2), Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 3715

Section, acts May 23, 1908, ch. 192, 35 Stat. 264, 266; Mar. 4, 1915, ch. 144, 38 Stat. 1109, provided for sale of copies of card index of publications. See section 3125a of this title.