Subject: HCl Test Results

‐ Lehigh, Redding plant
From: Stringham, Kent R. (Redding) NAM
To: Keith Barnett
Date: 03/30/2010 06:00 PM
Cc: "Ellison, Jim", "Sterner, Richard", "Matz, Tim"

Keith,

Lehigh Southwest Cement Company accomplished HCl testing at their Redding, CA plant this month.

The completed M321 spreadsheet, the M321 emission test report used to populate
the M321 spreadsheet, and the site specific test plan are attached.

Kent Stringham
Environmental Engineer Lehigh Southwest Cement Company Redding, CA 96003
530.275.1581 ext 3317

(See attached file: M321 Spreadsheet

‐ Lehigh.xls)(See attached file:
10087 1 Lehigh Cement HCl Results.pdf)(See attached file: 10087 1 Test Plan
with Appendices.pdf)

## SOURCE TEST PROTOCOL 2010 EMISSIONS COMPLIANCE TESTS, RELATIVE ACCURACY TEST AUDIT & EPA ICR HCl TESTS LEHIGH SOUTHWEST CEMENT COMPANY REDDING, CALIFORNIA

Prepared For:



### LEHIGH SOUTHWEST CEMENT COMPANY Redding, California

For Submittal To:



### SHASTA COUNTY AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT Redding, California

Prepared By:

Mark L. Stanfield 

### THE AVOGADRO GROUP, LLC 401 Pech Road Medford, Oregon 97502 (541) 665-0170

February 17, 2010Lehigh Southwest Cement Company February 17, 2010 2010 Source Test Protocol

10087.1 ii 

### SUMMARY INFORMATION

Source Information

Source Location: Lehigh Southwest Cement Company

Address: 15390 Wonderland Blvd. Redding, CA 96003

Contact: Mr. Kent Stringham Telephone: (530) 275-1581, Ext. 3317 Facsimile: (530) 275-2525

Regulatory Agency: Shasta County Air Quality Management District

Unit: Cement kiln

Purposes: 1) Determination of particulate matter emissions and relative accuracy test audit (RATA) of the Continuous Emission Rate Monitoring System (CERMS) to satisfy SCAQMD permit requirements 2) Determination of HCl emissions to satisfy the EPA Information Collection Request (ICR).

Procedures: EPA Methods: 1, 2, 3A, 4, 5, 6C, 7E, 10 and 321

Permit to Operate: No. 85-PO-14k and EPA 40 CFR Part 60, Appendix B



### Testing Company Information

Testing Firm: The Avogadro Group, LLC 401 Pech Road Medford, Oregon 97502

Contacts: Mr. Mark Stanfield Mr. Erick Mirabella Project Manager General Manager

Telephone: (541) 665-0802 (925) 680-0935 Facsimile: (541) 665-0179 (925) 680-4416

Certification: ARB Independent Tester

Test Dates: March 23 & 24, 2010Lehigh Southwest Cement Company February 17, 2010 2010 Source Test Protocol

10087.1 iii 

### TABLE OF CONTENTS

SECTION PAGE

1.0 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................1

2.0 SOURCE LOCATION INFORMATION ...........................................................2

2.1 FACILITY DESCRIPTION ........................................................................2 2.2 SAMPLING LOCATION ............................................................................2

3.0 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION ................................................................................3

3.1 TESTING C ONTRACTOR .........................................................................3 3.2 PROGRAM OBJECTIVES .........................................................................3 3.3 TEST CONDITIONS ...................................................................................4 3.4 TEST SCHEDULE ......................................................................................5

4.0 SOURCE TESTING PROCEDURES ..................................................................6
4.1 TEST PROCEDURES .................................................................................6 4.1.1 Gaseous Emissions ...........................................................................7 4.1.2 Particulate Matter (PM) ...................................................................8 4.1.3 Relative Accuracy Test Audit (RATA) ...........................................9 4.1.4 Hydrogen Chloride (HCl) ................................................................9 4.1.5 Volumetric Flow Rates and Moisture Content ..............................11 4.1.6 Process Data ...................................................................................11

5.0 SOURCE TEST REPORT ..................................................................................12



### APPENDICES

A MEASUREMENT PROCEDURES .................................................................... A

B QUALITY ASSURANCE AND ARB CERTIFICATION ................................ B

C OPERATING PERMIT ....................................................................................... C

D FIELD WORK SAFETY PLAN .......................................................................... DLehigh Southwest Cement Company February 17, 2010 2010 Source Test Protocol

10087.1 1 

### SECTION 1.0

INTRODUCTION

The Avogadro Group, LLC (Avogadro) has b een contracted by Lehigh Southwest Cement Company (Lehigh) to perform a series of emission tests at their facility in Redding, California. The tests are scheduled for March 23-24, 2010 with start times of approximately 8:00 A.M. each day.

The purpose of the testing is two fold. Firs t, determine the compliance status of the source for particulate matter emissions and audit the performance of the CERMS in accordance with EPA 40 CFR, Part 60, Appendi x B and the Permit to Operate (PTO) 85- PO-14k issued by the Shasta County Air Qu ality Management District (SCAQMD). Second, determine HCl concentrations and emission rates to satisfy the EPA ICR. The following emission parameters will be determined:

 Compliance Tests
 PM - gr/dscf, gr/dscf @ 7% O 2 , lb/hr, lb/ton of feed

 Relative Accuracy Test Audit (RATA)
 O 2 - % volume dry  CO - lb/hr  NO X - lb/hr  SO 2 - lb/hr  Flow monitor - kdscfm

 EPA ICR Tests
 HCl – ppmvd @ 7% O 2

 Supporting Data
 CO 2 - % volume dry  Stack gas volumetric flow rate - dscfm  Moisture content - % by volume

Avogadro will provide the test personnel a nd all necessary equipment to measure emissions as required by the regulations and permit conditions. Lehigh personnel will provide the plant process data to be included in the final report. The results of the tests will be presented in a report and delivered to Lehigh within 30 days after completion of the field tests. This test protocol provides descriptions of the facility and test location, descriptions of the testing program, the test methods and procedures, the program schedule, and a summary of our quality assurance program.Lehigh Southwest Cement Company February 17, 2010 2010 Source Test Protocol

10087.1 2 

### SECTION 2.0

SOURCE LOCATION INFORMATION

2.1 FACILITY DESCRIPTION

Lehigh Cement is located in Redding, Califor nia and operates a cement kiln to provide raw cement to ready mix companies throughout the area. The kiln includes a baghouse to control particulate emissions and a CERMS to monitor O 2 , CO, NO X and SO 2 . The facility also monitors stack gas flow rate and flue gas opacity.



### 2.2 SAMPLING LOCATION

Emissions from the kiln exhaust through a ve rtical, cylindrical stack that measures 83.5 inches in diameter. There are four sampling ports, located 90 degrees from each other in the same horizontal plane, which provide access to traverse points for sampling. The ports are located approximately 100 feet (14 stack diameters) downstream and 80 feet (11 diameters) upstream from flow disturban ces. Access to the sampling location is by elevator to a permanent testing platform approximately 120 feet above ground level.

Avogadro personnel will verify the dimensiona l measurements of the stack prior to testing. A diagram of the sampling location a nd traverse point locations will be included in the final report. The estimated stack gas conditions are presented in Table 2-1.



### TABLE 2-1 ESTIMATED STACK GAS CONDITIONS CEMENT KILN LEHIGH SOUTHWEST CEMENT COMPANY

Stack Parameter Value
Temperature of flue gas, °F 230 - 260 Volumetric flow rate, kdscfm @ 70 °F 124 - 130 Moisture content, % volume 16 - 18 Oxygen, % volume dry 10 - 11 Carbon dioxide, % volume dry 16.5 - 17.5 Carbon monoxide, ppm volume dry 200 - 500 Nitrogen oxide, ppm volume dry 100 - 300 Sulfur dioxide, ppm volume dry 1 - 5Lehigh Southwest Cement Company February 17, 2010 2010 Source Test Protocol

10087.1 3 

### SECTION 3.0

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

A series of measurements will be made to determine emissions from the cement kiln at Lehigh Cement. The scope includes the perfor mance of three particulate matter and three HCl test runs at each of two operating conditions (mill on and mill off). In addition, at least nine O 2 , CO, NO X , SO 2 and stack flow test runs (mill on) will be performed to complete a RATA of the facility’s CERMS.



### 3.1 TESTING CONTRACTOR

The test program will be conducted by Avogadro. The contact persons for the project will be:

 The Avogadro Group: Mark Stanfield (541) 665-0802

 Lehigh Cement: Kent Stringham (530) 275-1581

 Shasta County AQMD: Ross Bell (530) 225-5674

Avogadro is a recognized independent contr actor that has been approved to conduct emission source testing on behalf of the California Air Resources Board (CARB), pursuant to Section 91200-21220, Title 17, of th e California Code of Regulations. Avogadro is a full service source testing a nd combustion engineering consulting firm with extensive experience in pollution cont rol. Avogadro will provide a professional source test team to conduct the testing as described in this test plan.

The test team members assigned to this proj ect are familiar with the testing of cement kilns and have successfully conducted these emi ssions tests at this facility in the past. Mark Stanfield has been assigned as project manager. Up to three experienced technicians will provide on-site support.



### 3.2 PROGRAM OBJECTIVES

The test program has two objectives. First, tests will be performed to determine the particulate matter emission compliance status of the unit as well as to audit the performance of the CERMS in accordance with the current permit to operate and EPA 40 CFR, Part 60, Appendices B and F. Second, tests will be performed to measure and report HCl concentrations to satisfy the EPA ICR dated February 3, 2010. The final report will present the results of the emi ssion tests and will compare them to the applicable standards outlined in Table 3-1.Lehigh Southwest Cement Company February 17, 2010 2010 Source Test Protocol

10087.1 4 

### TABLE 3-1 SUMMARY OF EMISSION AND PERFORMANCE STANDARDS CEMENT KILN LEHIGH SOUTHWEST CEMENT COMPANY

Parameter: Reference Standard

O 2 analyzer:

% relative accuracy, % volume dry 40 CFR, Part 60, App. B, PS 3, Section 13.2 1.00 a

CO analyzer:

% relative accuracy, lb/hr 40 CFR, Part 60, App. B, PS 6, Section 13.2 10.0 / 20.0 b

NO X analyzer:

% relative accuracy, lb/hr 40 CFR, Part 60, App. B, PS 6, Section 13.2 10 / 20.0 b

SO 2 analyzer:

% relative accuracy, lb/hr 40 CFR, Part 60, App. B, PS 6, Section 13.2 10 / 20.0 b

Flow monitor:

% relative accuracy, kdscfm 40 CFR, Part 60, App. B, PS 6, Section 13.2 20.0 c

Particulate matter:

lb/ton of feed PTO 85-PO-14K 0.3

HCl:

ppmvd @ 7% O 2 February 3, 2010 EPA ICR --

a No greater than 1% O 2 based on the absolute difference between the RM and CERMS data.

b No greater than 20% of the mean value of the RM’s test data in terms of the units of the emission standard, or 10%

of the applicable standard, whichever is greater.

c No greater than 20% of the mean value of the RM's test data.



### 3.3 TEST CONDITIONS

The tests will be conducted while the kiln is operating at a feed rate of approximately 135 to 145 tons/hr (or 95%-105% of maximum pr oduction). Lehigh personnel will establish the process conditions within the requirement s of the PTO. Unit operating data including CERMS data will be collected by Lehigh personnel, and will be provided to Avogadro for documentation of the process conditions and for comparison with the relative accuracy test audit results.Lehigh Southwest Cement Company February 17, 2010 2010 Source Test Protocol

10087.1 5 

### 3.4 TEST SCHEDULE

The test program will be performed over tw o days. Table 3-2 presents the sampling schedule.



### TABLE 3-2 TEST SCHEDULE

CEMENT KILN LEHIGH SOUTHWEST CEMENT COMPANY

Day Activity Sample Runs Run Duration
March 22, 2010 Mobilize and set-up -- ~ 4 hours

March 23, 2010 (Mill off) Emission Tests O 2 , CO 2 PM HCl Various 1, 2, 3 1, 2, 3 40 min. ea. 60 min. ea. 60 min. ea.

March 24, 2010 (Mill on) Emission Tests O 2 , CO 2 , CO, NO X , SO 2 , Flows
PM HCl 1-9 (up to 12) 1, 2, 3 1, 2, 3 21 min. ea. 60 min. ea. 60 min. ea.

April 22, 2010 Final report submittal -- --

Notes: A minimum of 9 test runs and a maximum of 12 te st runs will be performed. The relative accuracy of each monitor will be determined based on data collected during nine of the test runs.

.Lehigh Southwest Cement Company February 17, 2010 2010 Source Test Protocol

10087.1 6 

### SECTION 4.0

SOURCE TESTING PROCEDURES

4.1 TEST PROCEDURES

Descriptions of the test methods are incl uded in Appendix A. Brief descriptions, including any site-specific applications or m odifications, are included in the subsections, which follow here. Where any conflicts exist in the descriptions, the site-specific description here in Section 4.1 will take precedence. The EPA Method 29 pre-test calculations are presented in Appendix E. A list of sampling procedures is outlined in Table 4-1.



### TABLE 4-1 TEST PROCEDURES CEMENT KILN LEHIGH SOUTHWEST CEMENT COMPANY

Parameter Reference Method Measurement Principle Method Detection Limit

O 2 EPA 3A Paramagnetism 2% of instrument full scale

CO 2 EPA 3A Non-dispersive infrared 2% of instrument full scale

CO EPA 10 Gas filter correlation 2% of instrument full scale

NO X EPA 7E Chemiluminescence 2% of instrument full scale

SO 2 EPA 6C Ultraviolet absorption 2% of instrument full scale PM EPA 5 Gravimetry 0.0005 gr/dscf HCl EPA 321 Fourier transform infrared ~ 0.5 ppmv Stack flow rate EPA 1, 2 Pitot tube / temp. traverse --

Moisture cont. EPA 4 Gravimetry --Lehigh Southwest Cement Company February 17, 2010 2010 Source Test Protocol

10087.1 7 4.1.1 Gaseous Emissions

Concentrations of the gaseous constituents of the stack gas (CO, NO X , SO 2 , O 2 and CO 2 ) will be measured using Avogadro’s dry extractive continuous emissions monitor system (CEMS) described in Appendix A. This system meets the requirements of EPA and CARB methods for gaseous species. A heat ed Teflon line and chilled knockout system will be used to prevent loss of NO 2 and SO 2 in the sampling system. The NO X analyzer will be operated in the NO X mode to measure NO plus NO 2 . A molybdenum catalyst converter is used to convert NO 2 to NO for measurement of total NO X
.
The sample conditioning and delivery syst em includes components to extract a representative sample from the source, remove the moisture and particulate matter from the sample stream, and transport the sample to the analyzers. The primary components of this subsystem are:

1) A quartz, titanium, stainless steel or glass probe - heated or insulated as necessary to avoid condensation,
2) Sample filtration – filters located on the probe, pump, and prior to all of the analyzers for removal of particulate matter,
3) Teflon tubing - connecting the probe to the sample conditioner and the sample conditioner to the analyzer manifold - heated or insulated as necessary to avoid condensation,
4) Sample conditioner - glass or stainless steel flasks immersed in an ice bath to remove the moisture from the sample gas stream,
5) Vacuum pump - a leak-free pump with Teflon diaphragm to transport the sample gas through the system,
6) Sample manifold - a distribution syst em, constructed of stainless steel and Teflon tubing, to direct sample gas to the analyzers, and
7) Sample flow rate control - a seri es of rotameters, vacuum gauges and pressure gauges connected to the manifold used to maintain the appropriate sample flow rates.

The calibration gas system utilizes only EPA Protocol gases to verify the operation, linearity, and range settings of the electronic an alyzers. The sample gas system allows for the introduction of the protocol gases to the analyzers either directly through the manifold (calibration error check - performe d once daily) or through the sampling system (system bias check - performed with each run).

The electronic analyzers are rack-mounted and are maintained in the mobile lab. The data recording and acquisition system is base d on a digital system known as STRATA. ItLehigh Southwest Cement Company February 17, 2010 2010 Source Test Protocol

10087.1 8 includes software for controlling the collec tion of calibration and emission monitoring data, and hardware for connection of the analyzer outputs to the recording system.

Test results can be provided in three forms: on-site printouts of the digitized data, diskette recordings of the digitized data, and printouts of strip charts from the monitoring data. For this test program, on-site printout s of the one-minute averages will be provided in the final report.

4.1.2 Particulate Matter (PM)

Particulate matter emissions will be measured according to EPA Method 5.

A metered flue gas sample is collected isokinetically and particulates are collected on a heated filter followed by a series of water impingers.

The sample is drawn through a nozzle, a stainl ess steel or glass probe and a filter in a 250oF temperature-controlled oven. This is followed by two Greenburg-Smith impingers which contain 100 ml of distilled water, an empty impinger as a knock-out and an impinger containing silica gel to protect th e leak-free vacuum pump and calibrated dry gas meter from moisture. The impingers collect condensible particulate species while the filter collects any existing as particulate at 250oF.

EPA Method 4 (moisture) and Methods 1 and 2 (velocity) are performed in conjunction with the test. Stack velocity is measured during the test to maintain isokinetic sampling and to measure stack flow rate. Moisture concentration is determined by weighing the impingers before and after sampling to determine the amount of moisture collected.

Following testing, the impingers are weighe d for moisture determination and the following sample fractions are recovered:

1. Probe, nozzle and front-half gla ssware – acetone wash and brushing

2. Filter

The probe, nozzle and front-half glassware wa sh is evaporated at low temperatures, baked at 105oC then desiccated and weighed to a constant weight. The filter is baked at 105oC, desiccated and weighed to a constant weight.

Particulate concentration is determined by dividing the mass of particulate collected by the sample gas volume.Lehigh Southwest Cement Company February 17, 2010 2010 Source Test Protocol

10087.1 9 4.1.3 Relative Accuracy Test Audit (RATA)

The test results will be used to calculate re lative accuracy (RA) in units of lb/hr for the CO, NO X and SO 2 analyzers. The rela tive accuracy of the O 2 analyzer will be determined in percent by volume (dry basis) units. The relative accuracy of the flow monitor will be determined in units of thousand dry standard cubic feet per minute (kdscfm).

For each reference method (RM) determination, the flue gas will be sampled at three traverse points along the “measurement line” th at will be determined prior to testing using EPA Method 1 procedures . The differences between the RM sample and the pollutant monitor's readings will be evaluated from a minimum of nine sets of paired monitor and RM test data. From these di fferences, the 95% confidence coefficient will be calculated, and the relative accuracy determined. Any tests not included in the calculations for the determination of relativ e accuracy (maximum of three) will still be included in the final test report.

The relative accuracy of the O 2 analyzer will be determined in accordance with 40 CFR Part 60, Appendix B, Specifica tion 3. The RATA results are acceptable if the mean difference of the O 2 monitors’ measurements and the corresponding RM measurements are within ±1.0% O 2

.

In accordance with 40 CFR Part 60, A ppendix B (Specification 6), CO, NO X and SO 2 relative accuracy test results are acceptable if the CO, NO X and SO 2 relative accuracy does not exceed 20% of the mean value of the RM test data in terms of units of the emission standard or 10% of the applicable standard, whichever is greater.

In accordance with Performance Specification 6, Section 13.2, flow rate relative accuracy test results are acceptable if the results do not exceed 20% of the mean value of the RM test data, when expressed in the reporting units.

4.1.4 Hydrogen Chloride (HCl)

Hydrogen chloride (HCl) concentrations will be measured using a Fourier transform infrared spectrometer (FTIR).

A flue gas sample is extracted from the exhaust stack and delivered to the FTIR monitoring system. The FTIR scans approximately once per minute to measure concentrations of individual compounds based on the IR absorption spectra.

An exhaust gas sample will be collected con tinuously from a single point near the center of the exhaust stack. The gas sample will be drawn directly from the stack to the sample cell of the FTIR spectrometer through a probe of stainless steel t ubing and a length of heated Teflon tubing sample line, maintained at 250  F (120 o C) or greater. A diaphragm-Lehigh Southwest Cement Company February 17, 2010 2010 Source Test Protocol

10087.1 10 type pump will be used to induce sample flow of approximately 2 to 10 liters per minute. The FTIR cell will be heated and wrapped in an insulating blanket, and its temperature will be monitored with a digital Type K or J ther mocouple. All target compound concentrations will be adjusted for differences in temperatur e and pressure from the reference calibration spectra.

EPA Methods 1 through 4 will be performed in conjunction with the test to provide stack gas flow rate, molecular weight, and mois ture content data. The FTIR measures concentrations on a wet basis in units of ppm volume wet.

MIDAC Corporation developed the FTIR system , an extractive-type system. The system consists of a medium-resolution Michaelson interferometer; a heated infrared 10-meter folded “White” absorption cell design; and a liquid nitrogen-cooled mercury cadmium telluride (MCT) broadband infrared detector. The system is equipped with a dedicated computer for data collection, reduction, and storage.

The nominal spectral resolution of the system is one-half wave number (0.5 cm -1 ). The inside walls and mirror housing of the cell are po lished nickel to minimize interaction of the sample with the cell walls. The cell will be maintained at 120 o C or an adequate temperature to prevent condensation in the cell or polymerization of any of the target compounds while not degrading them. As described in EPA Method 320, the absorption path length of the cell will be checked before a nd after each test run to ensure that the path length between runs has not differed by more than 5% from their mean value.

An FTIR spectrum of the flue gas is obt ained by continuously flowing gas through the sample cell with sample gas and recording the spectrum. Averaging individual scans produces the spectrum. A minimum of 32 scans will be used for sample collection. Each sequential spectrum will be recorded continuousl y. A total of 12 sample readings will be taken per run as per EPA Method 320. The system will be checked for proper operation and path length. It will be calibrated with a calibration gas, referred to as a calibration transfer standard (CTS) gas, before and afte r each set of three test runs. In addition, calibration gases for one of the target com pounds will be used on-site to perform one dynamic matrix spike. A minimum of 10% of the stack gas matrix will be replaced with spike material at approximately 50% of th e target compound concentration found in the stack gas or 3 times the minimum detection lim it. Recovery must be between 70 and 130% of the spiked compound.

Prior to field mobilization, an analytical software quantification method, performed on MIDAC’s AutoquantPro 4.0 software, will be deve loped to provide on-site results for the majority of the target analytes. In add ition to the target compounds, this method will include spectra for water, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, and methane to account for any interference. The method will be optimi zed to minimize interferences by selecting regions that do not significantly overlap and are unique to the target analytes or by overlaying interfering species absorbance bands and allowing the software to discriminateLehigh Southwest Cement Company February 17, 2010 2010 Source Test Protocol

10087.1 11 by means of a Classical Least Squares (CLS) algorithm. After sample collection, this method may be modified, sometimes resulting in significantly different results than those presented on-site. All supporting data and documentation will be presented in the report.

Sample spectra collected at the test site w ill be compared manually and visually with the target compound reference spectra. This allo ws the analyst to determine instrumental differences, and to account for spectral differen ces that are not concentration related. The sample and calibration spectra will be analy zed using AutoquantPro 4.0 software for gas phase infrared spectral analysis. The output will consist of calculated concentrations (in parts per million by volume, wet basis) and e rror calculations for each of the target analytes.

4.1.5 Volumetric Flow Rates and Moisture Content

Stack gas volumetric flow rates and moisture content will be determined by using EPA Methods 2 and 4. Flow traverse s will be performed (one traverse per gaseous test run) to provide data for the flow monitor RATA de termination. The moisture content will be determined with the concurrent PM test runs.

4.1.6 Process Data

Lehigh personnel will establish the process conditions within the requirements of the PTO. Unit operating data, including CERMS data will be collected by Lehigh Cement personnel, and will be provided to Avogadro for documentation of the process conditions and for comparison with the relative accuracy test audit results.Lehigh Southwest Cement Company February 17, 2010 2010 Source Test Protocol

10087.1 12 

### SECTION 5.0

SOURCE TEST REPORT

Avogadro will prepare a thorough, clear report summarizing the test descriptions and results. Included in the appendices will be c opies of the field data sheets, equipment calibration data, and example calculations. Avogadro uses computer spreadsheets to calculate results from field data sheets and laboratory results. One run of every method performed is also hand calculated. The hand calculations are checked against the spreadsheet results and included in the exampl e calculation appendix of the final report. Avogadro understands the “Standard Condition(s) ” that are to be used in the SCAQMD are 29.92 inches of mercury and 70 oF.

Prior to release by Avogadro, the report will be reviewed and certified by Mark Stanfield and either his supervisor or a peer. The report will be issued within 30 days after completion of the field testing.alue in dryppmvd). Iction limitimit inEnclosure5cSpreadsheeEnclosure‐‐ERTSpreadsheetCCocetocopp@%RawmillonWorksheet Title:HCl Emission Test Results Template Using Method 321Who Should Complete this Spreadsheet?Facilities that use Method 321 to test for HClCompany Name:Lehigh Southwest Cement CompanyFacility Name:ReddingAddress:15390 Wonderland BlvdCity:ReddingState:CAKiln ID:1Kiln Type:PHIn-line Raw Mill:YesControl Device Configuration:In line Raw Mill/Kiln Baghouse (S260)Parameter Sample #1 Sample #2 Sample #3 Test AverageUnits Units Other DescriptionTest Method UsedTest LocationNoteEnter HCl concentration vparts per million volume (test results are below deteplease note the detection lbrackets(e.g., [< 0.010]).Select approprifrom list. If othselected pleaseunits in columnf the,ate uniter isdescribeH at right.Enter the name ofthe Test Method used.Indicate whether the testoccurred upstream ordownstream of a controldevice(s); list the controldevice(s)If kiln has an in-line raw mill,indicate raw mill status during tests(i.e., raw mill on or raw mill off).Provide any other informationsupporting information you think isnecessary about this test report.Sample Date (mm/dd/yyyy)3/16/20103/16/2010 3/16/2010HCl Concentration - as measured - dry3.001.67 1.60ppmvdOxygen Concentration - dry basis11.0710.72 11.60%CO2 Concentration - dry basis16.6217.18 15.92%HCl Concentration - corrected to 7%atectedto7%4.242.292.39 2.97ppmvd@7% O2Method 321Downstream; BaghouseRawmillon; gExhaust Stream %Moisture14.015.315.5%Raw mill onExhaust Flowrate133,025135,639 133,951dscfmRaw mill onExhaust Temperature228.4227.9 218.0degrees FRaw mill onSample Date(mm/dd/yyyy)3/17/20103/17/2010 3/17/2010HCl Concentration - as measured - dry35.2916.98 15.91ppmvdOxygen Concentration - drybasis9.2368.914 8.966%CO2 Concentration - drybasis19.7420.16 20.29%HCl Concentration42.0519.69 18.53 26.76ppmvd@7% O2Mthod 321Downstream; BaghouseRaw mill offExhaust Stream %Moisture14.814.55.5%Raw mill offExhaust Flowrate115,358111,530 108,519dscfmRaw mill offExhaust Temperature280.0281.7 284.3degrees FRaw mill offNotes:Peach shaded cells indicate areas where the user will enter a response