alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 776.81 Forwarding the complaint. ( a ) If the Rules Counsel determines there is probable cause to believe that a violation of subpart B of this part or of the Code of Judicial Conduct has occurred, and the violation is not of a minor or technical nature, the Rules Counsel shall notify the JAG. (In cases relating to Marine Corps judge advocates, including trial and appellate judges, in which the SJA to CMC is not the cognizant Rules Counsel, the SJA to CMC shall also be notified.) The Rules Counsel shall forward the complaint and any allied papers, as follows: ( 1 ) In cases involving a military trial judge, if practicable, to a covered attorney with experience as a military trial judge (normally senior to and of the same Service (Navy or Marine Corps) as the covered attorney complained of and not previously involved in the case) and assign the officer to conduct a preliminary inquiry into the matter;
( 2 ) In cases involving a military appellate judge, if practicable, to a covered attorney with experience as a military appellate judge (normally senior to and of the same Service (Navy or Marine Corps) as the covered attorney complained of and not previously involved in the case) and assign the officer to conduct a preliminary inquiry into the matter;
( 3 ) In all other cases, to such covered attorney as the cognizant Rules Counsel may designate (normally senior to the covered attorney complained of and not previously involved in the case), and assign the officer to conduct a preliminary inquiry into the matter.
( b ) The Rules Counsel shall provide notice of the complaint (if not previously informed) as well as notice of the preliminary inquiry: ( 1 ) To the covered attorney against whom the complaint is made as well as the supervisory attorney;
( 2 ) In cases involving a covered USG attorney on active duty or in civilian Federal service, to the commanding officer, or equivalent, of the covered USG attorney concerned;
( 3 ) In cases involving Navy or Marine Corps judge advocates serving in Naval Legal Service Command (NLSC) units, to Commander, NLSC;
( 4 ) In cases involving Navy attorneys serving in Marine Corps units, involving Marine Corps attorneys serving in Navy units, or involving Marine Corps trial and appellate judges, to the SJA to CMC (Attn: JAR);
( 5 ) In cases involving trial or appellate court judges, to either the Chief Judge, Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary or Chief Judge, Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals, as appropriate; and
( 6 ) In cases involving covered attorneys certified by the Judge Advocates General/Chief Counsel of the other uniformed services, to the appropriate military service attorney discipline section.
1 In The



### Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

____________________

NO

. 09

- 15

- 00518

- CR

____________________

JOHNATH A N L I V ING S TON GREER , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

_________________________________ ______________________

On A ppeal from the Criminal District Court

Jefferson County, Texas

Trial Cause No

. 13

- 16614

________________________________________ ____ ____________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Pursuant to a plea bargain agreement, Johnath a n L i ving s ton Greer 1 pleaded

guilty to burglary of a habitation. The trial court found the evidence sufficient to

substantiate Greer’s guilt, deferred further proceedings, and placed Greer on

community supervision for ten years and assess ed a fine of $500. The State later

filed a motion to revoke Greer’s community supervision, alleging five violations of

the conditions of his community supervision. Greer pleaded “true” to two

1 Johnath a n L i ving s ton Greer is also known as Johnath o n L evington Greer.2 violation s of his community supervision. After hearing evidence regarding the

State’s allegation that Greer committed the offense of robbery while on community

supervision , t he trial court found that Greer had violated the conditions of his

community supervision, adjudicated Greer’s guilt for burglary of a habitation,

revoked Greer’s community supervision, and sentenced Greer to twenty years in

prison.

Greer’s appellate counsel filed a brief that presents counsel’s professional

evaluation of the record and concludes the appeal is frivolous. See Anders v.

California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967); High v. State , 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App.

1978). On May 20, 2016, we granted an extension of time for Greer to file a pro se

brief. We received no response from Greer

. We have determined that Greer’s

appeal is wholly frivolous. W e have independently reviewed the clerk’s record and

the reporter’s record , and we agree with counsel’s conclusion that no arguable

issues support Greer’s appeal. Therefore, we find it unnecessary to order

appointment of new counsel to re

- brief the appeal

. Compare Stafford v. State , 813

S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). We affirm the trial court’s judgment. 2

2 Greer may challenge our decision in this case by filing a petition for discretionary review. See Tex. R. App. P. 68.3 AFFIRMED.

______________________________ STEVE McKEITHEN

Chief Justice

Submitted on August 24, 2016 Opinion Delivered August 31, 2016

D o Not Publish

Before McKeithen, C.J., Horton and Johnson , JJ.
##### 



ENNIS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10Q
FOR THE PERIOD ENDED MAY 31, 2007
 EXHIBIT 32.1
 SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
  (1)
    
    The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended May 31, 2007, as filed
with the Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods
expressed in the Report.
 /s/ Keith S. WaltersKeith S. WaltersChairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer Date: July 3, 2007 The foregoing Certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350; it is not
being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date
hereof, regardless of any general incorporation languages in such filing.
EXHIBIT 32 (a)

CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of Enzo Biochem, Inc., and Subsidiaries (the
Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2007 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Elazar Rabbani, Ph.D., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                         |     |                           
|------------------------ | --- | --------------------------
|Dated:
 October 12, 2007 | By: | /s/ Elazar
 Rabbani, Ph.D.
|                         |     |                           
|                         |     |                           
|                         |     | Elazar Rabbani, Ph.D.     
|                         |     | Chief Executive Officer   

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Act
Commission or its staff upon request.

---
UNITED STATES NAVY–MARINE CORPS

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

_________________________

No. 201600405

_________________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Appellee

v.

EDWIN I. AGUINALDO, JR.

Sergeant (E-5), U.S. Marine Corps

Appellant

_________________________

Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary

Military Judge: Colonel James K. Carberry, USMC.

Convening Authority: Commanding General, 1st Marine Division 

(REIN), Camp Pendleton, CA.

Staff Judge Advocate’s Recommendation: Lieutenant Colonel 

Matthew J. Stewart, USMC.

For Appellant: Lieutenant Commander Derek C. Hampton, JAGC, 

USN.

For Appellee: Brian K. Keller, Esq.

_________________________

Decided 9 March 2017

_________________________

Before CAMPBELL, HUTCHISON, and ELLINGTON, Appellate Military 

Judges

_________________________

After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of 

error, we affirm the findings and sentence as approved by the convening 

authority. Art. 66(c), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c). 

For the Court

R.H. TROIDL

Clerk of Court
§ 634.8 Implied consent. ( a ) *Implied consent to blood, breath, or urine tests.* Persons who drive on the installation shall be deemed to have given their consent to evidential tests for alcohol or other drug content of their blood, breath, or urine when lawfully stopped, apprehended, or cited for any offense allegedly committed while driving or in physical control of a motor vehicle on military installations to determine the influence of intoxicants.
( b ) *Implied consent to impoundment.* Any person granted the privilege to operate or register a motor vehicle on a military installation shall be deemed to have given his or her consent for the removal and temporary impoundment of the POV when it is parked illegally, or for unreasonable periods, as determined by the installation commander or applicable authority, interfering with military operations, creating a safety hazard, disabled by accident, left unattended in a restricted or controlled area, or abandoned. Such persons further agree to reimburse the United States for the cost of towing and storage should their motor vehicle be removed or impounded. Existence of these conditions will be determined by the installation commander or designee.
( c ) Any person who operates, registers, or who is in control of a motor vehicle on a military installation involved in a motor vehicle or criminal infraction shall be informed that notice of the violation of law or regulation will be forwarded to the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) of the host state and/or home of record for the individual, and to the National Register, when applicable.
§ 746.9 Royalties. ( a ) *Nonexclusive license.* Normally, royalties shall not be changed under nonexclusive licenses granted to United States citizens and United States corporations on government inventions; however, the Chief of Naval Research may require other consideration.
( b ) *Limited exclusive license.* A limited exclusive license on a government invention shall contain a royalty provision and/or other consideration flowing to the Government.
From: McWilliams, Douglas A. [ mailto:douglas.mcwilliams@squirepb.com ]

Sent: Monday, May 18, 2015 3:07 PM

To: Greenberg, Alan (ENRD)

Cc: Franz, Katy M.; Kacenjar, Allen A.

Subject: Release of Confidential Business Information for BART FIP Settlement Rule Support

‐‐ Attachment BB United Taconite

SO2 Control Cost Analysis [I

‐ AMS.FID1382176]

Alan,

As we discussed during our telephone conference on Friday, Cliffs is transmitting documents requested by EPA for use in support

of the BART FIP settlement rulemaking. These are documents previously marked confidential business information. In this e

‐

mail, Cliffs is transmitting a redacted version of the United Taconite SO2 Control Cost Analysis submitted as Attachment BB to

Cliffs’ September 28, 2012 comments on the BART FIP proposed rule. Cliffs withdraws its claim of confidential business

information as to the redacted version of this document only.

Additional documents requested by EPA with redactions sufficient for Cliffs to release CBI claims will be sent today via separate

e

‐ mails to ensure that the size of the attachments does not interfere with transmission.

The linked image cannot be displayed. The file may have been moved, renamed, or deleted. Verify that the link points to the co rrect file and location. Douglas A. McWilliams

Partner

Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP

4900 Key Tower

127 Public Square

Cleveland, Ohio 44114

T +1 216 479 8332

O +1 216 479 8500

F +1 216 479 8780

M +1 216 407 4968

Douglas.McWilliams@squirepb.com | squirepattonboggs.com



### ------------------ ------------------ ----------------- ----------------

44 Offices in 21 Countries

This message is confidential and may be legally privileged or otherwise protect ed from disclosure. If you are not the

intended recipient, please te lephone or email the sender and delete this me ssage and any attachment from your system;

you must not copy or disclose the co ntents of this message or any attachment to any other person.

Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP is part of the intern ational legal practice Squire Patton Boggs, which operates

worldwide through a number of sepa rate legal entities. Please visit www.squirepattonboggs.com for more information.

#US

------------------ ------------------ ----------------- ----------------
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
balance sheet and statement of income found on pages F-2 and F-3 of the
Company's Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1997, and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       292,415
<OTHER-SE>                                    (292,415)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                742,484
<INCOME-TAX>                                   300,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 (58,555)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   383,929
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0

</TABLE>
#### Lillian Newman, Respondent, v. Field Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al., Appellants, et al., Defendant.

Order, dated April 12, 1960, granting plaintiff’s motion for a priority to examine the defendants before trial unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondent. No opinion. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, Valente and Bergan, JJ.
### **CHAPTER 100—AGRICULTURAL MARKET TRANSITION**

#### SUBCHAPTER I—SHORT TITLE, PURPOSE, AND DEFINITIONS

Sec.
7201.
Short title and purpose.
7202.
Definitions.

#### SUBCHAPTER II—PRODUCTION FLEXIBILITY CONTRACTS

7211.
Authorization for use of production flexibility contracts.
7212.
Elements of contracts.
7213.
Amounts available for contract payments.
7214.
Determination of contract payments under contracts.
7215.
Applicability of payment limitations.
7216.
Violations of contract.
7217.
Transfer or change of interest in lands subject to contract.
7218.
Planting flexibility.

#### SUBCHAPTER III—NONRECOURSE MARKETING ASSISTANCE LOANS AND LOAN DEFICIENCY PAYMENTS

7231.
Availability of nonrecourse marketing assistance loans.
7232.
Loan rates for marketing assistance loans.
7233.
Term of loans.
7234.
Repayment of loans.
7235.
Loan deficiency payments.
7236.
Special marketing loan provisions for upland cotton.
7236a.
Special competitive provisions for extra long staple cotton.
7237.
Availability of recourse loans for high moisture feed grains and seed cotton and other fibers.

#### SUBCHAPTER IV—OTHER COMMODITIES

#### Part A—Dairy

7251.
Milk price support program.
7252.
Repealed.
7253.
Consolidation and reform of Federal milk marketing orders.
7254.
Effect on fluid milk standards in State of California.
7255.
Milk manufacturing marketing adjustment.
7256.
Northeast Interstate Dairy Compact.
7257.
Authority to assist in establishment and maintenance of one or more export trading companies.
7258.
Standby authority to indicate entity best suited to provide international market development and export services.
7259.
Study and report regarding potential impact of Uruguay Round on prices, income, and government purchases.

#### Part B—Sugar

7271.
Repealed.
7272.
Sugar program.

#### SUBCHAPTER V—ADMINISTRATION

7281.
Administration.
7282.
Adjustments of loans.
7283.
Commodity Credit Corporation interest rate.
7284.
Personal liability of producers for deficiencies.
7285.
Commodity Credit Corporation sales price restrictions.
7286.
Commodity certificates.
7287.
Commodity Credit Corporation storage payments.

#### SUBCHAPTER VI—PERMANENT PRICE SUPPORT AUTHORITY

7301.
Suspension and repeal of permanent price support authority.
7302.
Effect of chapter.

#### SUBCHAPTER VII—COMMISSION ON 21st CENTURY PRODUCTION AGRICULTURE

7311.
Establishment.
7312.
Composition.
7313.
Comprehensive review of past and future of production agriculture.
7314.
Reports.
7315.
Powers.
7316.
Commission procedures.
7317.
Personnel matters.
7318.
Termination of Commission.

#### SUBCHAPTER VIII—MISCELLANEOUS COMMODITY PROVISIONS

7331.
Options pilot program.
7332.
Risk management education.
7333.
Administration and operation of noninsured crop assistance program.
7334.
Repealed.
### §101524. Special rule for service contract to provide transportation services

Notwithstanding any other provision of law, a service contract entered into by the Secretary for the provision solely of transportation services in a System unit shall be not more than 10 years in length, including a base period of 5 years and annual extensions for up to an additional 5 years based on satisfactory performance and approval by the Secretary.

(Pub. L. 113–287, §3, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3134.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 101524 | 16 U.S.C. 5961(a). | Pub. L. 105–391, title IV, §412(a), Nov. 13, 1998, 112 Stat. 3514; Pub. L. 106–113, div. B, §1000(a)(3) [title I, §143(1)], Nov. 29, 1999, 113 Stat. 1535, 1501A–171. |

Section
### §229c. Separability

If any provision of this chapter or the application thereof to any person or circumstances is held invalid, the validity of the remainder of the chapter and of the application of such provision to other persons and circumstances shall not be affected thereby.

(Aug. 15, 1921, ch. 64, title IV, §417, formerly §408, 42 Stat. 169; renumbered §411, Pub. L. 94–410, §5, Sept. 13, 1976, 90 Stat. 1250; renumbered §415, Pub. L. 100–173, §9(1), Nov. 23, 1987, 101 Stat. 919; renumbered §416, Pub. L. 106–472, title III, §312(e)(1), Nov. 9, 2000, 114 Stat. 2077; renumbered §417, Pub. L. 110–234, title XI, §11004(a)(1), May 22, 2008, 122 Stat. 1355, and Pub. L. 110–246, §4(a), title XI, §11004(a)(1), June 18, 2008, 122 Stat. 1664, 2117.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Pub. L. 110–234 and Pub. L. 110–246 both renumbered this section as section 417 of act Aug. 15, 1921. Pub. L. 110–234 was repealed by section 4(a) of Pub. L. 110–246 effective May 22, 2008, the date of enactment of Pub. L. 110–234.

Section was formerly classified to section 229 of this title.
#### § 723.1 General provisions.

This part sets up procedures for correction of naval and marine records by the Secretary of the Navy acting through the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR or the Board) to remedy error or injustice. It describes how to apply for correction of naval and marine records and how the BCNR considers applications. It defines the Board's authority to act on applications. It directs collecting and maintaining information subject to the Privacy Act of 1974 authorized by 10 U.S.C. 1034 and 1552.
FORM 6-K



SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION



Washington, D.C. 20549



Report of Foreign Issuer



Pursuant to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16 of



Securities Exchange Act of 1934



For the month of March 2007



ABBEY NATIONAL PLC

(Translation of registrant's name into English)



Abbey National House, 2 Triton Square, Regents

Place, London NW1 3AN, England

(Address of principal executive offices)





Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports under cover Form 20-F or Form 40-F.



Form 20-F . . . .X. . . . Form 40-F . . . . . . . .



Indicate by check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the information contained in this Form is also thereby furnishing the information to the Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.



Yes . . . . . . . No . . .X. . . .







---

Abbey National Sterling Capital plc



Abbey National Sterling Capital plc Annual Report and Accounts 2006



A copy of the above document has been submitted to the UK Listing Authority, and will shortly be available for Inspection at the UK Listing Authoritys Document Viewing Facility which is situated at:



Financial Services Authority

25 The North Colonnade

Canary Wharf

London

E14 5HS





---















SIGNATURES



Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.







| |                        | ABBEY NATIONAL PLC      
| | ---------------------- | ------------------------
| |                        |                         
| |                        |                         
| |                        |                         
| | Dated: 26 March 2007   | By  / s / Jessica Petrie
| | (Authorised Signatory) |