alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §2910. Preemption of other Federal and State programs; applicability of provisions to amendments to orders

(a) Nothing in this chapter may be construed to preempt or supersede any other program relating to beef promotion organized and operated under the laws of the United States or any State.

(b) The provisions of this chapter applicable to the order shall be applicable to amendments to the order.

(Pub. L. 94–294, §11, May 28, 1976, 90 Stat. 535; Pub. L. 99–198, title XVI, §1601(b), Dec. 23, 1985, 99 Stat. 1606.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1985—Pub. L. 99–198 amended section generally, substituting administrative provisions for provisions relating to applicability of provisions to amendments to orders.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1985 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 99–198 effective Jan. 1, 1986, see section 1601(c) of Pub. L. 99–198, set out as a note under section 2901 of this title.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<CIK> 0000764403
<NAME> ETOWN CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      595,310
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                     74,726
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                          48,355
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                        39,508
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 757,899
<COMMON>                                       165,794
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      (3,763)
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                             50,819
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 212,850
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     12,227
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           274,295
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                              40,694
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                          216
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                   12,030
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 205,803
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  757,899
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                       43,907
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                             4,482
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      26,508
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      30,990
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                         12,917
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                 354
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                  13,271
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         4,513
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,758
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        203
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                    8,555
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                         4,276
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                        4,049
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                          27,857
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.00<F1>
<FN>
<F1>All amounts are in thousands of dollars except per share amounts.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
### §1636g. Suspension authority regarding specific terms of price reporting requirements

#### (a) In general

The Secretary may suspend any requirement of this subchapter if the Secretary determines that application of the requirement is inconsistent with the purposes of this subchapter.

#### (b) Suspension procedure

#### (1) Period

A suspension under subsection (a) shall be for a period of not more than 240 days.

#### (2) Action by Congress

If an Act of Congress concerning the requirement that is the subject of the suspension under subsection (a) is not enacted by the end of the period of the suspension established under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall implement the requirement.

(Aug. 14, 1946, ch. 966, title II, §258, as added Pub. L. 106–78, title IX, §911(2), Oct. 22, 1999, 113 Stat. 1205.)
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6352
VICTOR TYRONE BASS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus IREDELL COUNTY; CLYDE LLOYD; SERGEANT RICK, Defendants - Appellees.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Graham C. Mullen, District Judge. (CA-96-103-5-MU) Submitted: August 28, 1997 Decided: September 16, 1997 Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Victor Tyrone Bass, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant, a North Carolina inmate, appeals the districtcourt's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915(e)(2) (West Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Bass v. Iredell County , No. CA-96- 103-5-MU (W.D.N.C. Jan. 15, 1997; Feb. 6, 1997). We dispense withoral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
§ 516.32 Requests for indemnification. ( a ) *Policy.* An individual liable for a judgment rendered against him in his individual capacity has no right to reimbursement from DA. DA will consider, however, a request for indemnification from DA personnel where conduct within the scope of official duties has resulted in personal liability and indemnification is in the best interests of the United States. Indemnification is strictly contingent upon an appropriation to pay the judgment, as well as availability of such funds.
( b ) *Individual request procedures.* An individual against whom an adverse judgment has been rendered may request indemnification. The request must include, at a minimum, the following: how the employee was acting within the scope of his employment; whether the requestor has insurance or any other source of indemnification; and, how reimbursement is in the best interests of the United States. The request must also contain the following statements: “I understand that acceptance of this request for indemnification for processing by DA does not constitute an acceptance of any obligation to make such a payment. I also understand that payment is contingent on availability of funds and that it will only be made if such is determined to be in the best interests of the United States.” The individual should attach a copy of relevant documents, for example, court's opinion, judgment, and other allied papers.
( c ) *Supervisory and SJA procedures.* The request for indemnification will be submitted through supervisory channels to the local SJA or legal adviser. Each supervisor will make a recommendation on the propriety of reimbursement.
( d ) *Chief, Litigation Division, procedures.* Requests for indemnification will be forwarded to Chief, Litigation Division. The Chief, Litigation Division, will examine the submission and, after consultation with DOJ or other agencies, forward the packet with his recommendation to the Army General Counsel. The General Counsel will obtain a final decision by the Secretary of the Army or his designee on the matter. There is no administrative appeal of the Secretary's (or his designee's) decision.
Case: 3:11-cv-50373 Document #: 1 Filed: 12/20/11 Page 1 of 14 PageID #:1
Case: 3:11-cv-50373 Document #: 1 Filed: 12/20/11 Page 2 of 14 PageID #:2
Case: 3:11-cv-50373 Document #: 1 Filed: 12/20/11 Page 3 of 14 PageID #:3
Case: 3:11-cv-50373 Document #: 1 Filed: 12/20/11 Page 4 of 14 PageID #:4
Case: 3:11-cv-50373 Document #: 1 Filed: 12/20/11 Page 5 of 14 PageID #:5
Case: 3:11-cv-50373 Document #: 1 Filed: 12/20/11 Page 6 of 14 PageID #:6
Case: 3:11-cv-50373 Document #: 1 Filed: 12/20/11 Page 7 of 14 PageID #:7
Case: 3:11-cv-50373 Document #: 1 Filed: 12/20/11 Page 8 of 14 PageID #:8
Case: 3:11-cv-50373 Document #: 1 Filed: 12/20/11 Page 9 of 14 PageID #:9
Case: 3:11-cv-50373 Document #: 1 Filed: 12/20/11 Page 10 of 14 PageID #:10
Case: 3:11-cv-50373 Document #: 1 Filed: 12/20/11 Page 11 of 14 PageID #:11
Case: 3:11-cv-50373 Document #: 1 Filed: 12/20/11 Page 12 of 14 PageID #:12
Case: 3:11-cv-50373 Document #: 1 Filed: 12/20/11 Page 13 of 14 PageID #:13
Case: 3:11-cv-50373 Document #: 1 Filed: 12/20/11 Page 14 of 14 PageID #:14
November 5, 1998


Mr. Christopher J. Carey
1418 Jericho Road
Abington, PA  19001

Dear Chris:

I am pleased to  confirm  the  conditions  of our  employment  offer as
follows:

1.  Annualized Salary:  $250,000

2.  Target Bonus (for 1999 performance):  $150,000

3. Stock Option:  40,000,  with  5-year vesting schedule, 10-year term.
                  Immediate  vesting if  change of  control  (which  is
                  defined  as   the  dissolution  or   liquidation   of
                  Provident or any merger in which Provident is not the
                  surviving corporation).

4.  Title:  Executive Vice President & CFO of PFGI

5.  Change of Control:  If any change of control (see above definition)
                        over  the  next 2 years, base salary and target
                        bonus   guaranteed    for   the  2-year  period
                        following  the  effective  date  of  change  of
                        control.

6.  Termination of Employment:  If  for  other  than  acts  which  were
                                illegal, willfully negligent, dishonest,
                                fraudulent, or were  gross  misconduct,
                                the balance of base salary  and  target
                                bonus  payable  through  the  following
                                1-year period.

7.  Relocation:  Coverage  as  detailed  in comprehensive policy (being
                 mailed to your home).

8.  Benefits:  All  rights  and  privileges  as  provided  to  all Bank
               employees  (feel  free  to  contact Terry Henley, Senior
               Vice President, Human Resources, at (513) 579-2098.

9.  Deferred Compensation:  Eligible 1/1/99

10. Vacation:  4 weeks

11. Drug Test & Bondability:  Offer  contingent  upon  passing the drug
                              exam and bondability.

Chris,  I look forward to your  joining us as soon as possible.  If you
agree with the terms of this offer, please sign below and return a copy
to me.

Sincerely,


/s/ Robert L. Hoverson
Robert L. Hoverson
President & Chief Executive Officer

Agreed and accepted:


/s/  Christopher J. Carey
-------------------------
Christopher J. Carey

Date: November 16, 1998
      -----------------
MEMORANDUM

TO: Addressees

 

FROM: The Secretary

SUBJECT: Delegation of Authority

I. DELEGATION

Under the authority vested in me by section 412 of the Department of Education 

Organization Act, 20 U.S.C. §3472, I hereby delegated to you, and to anyone 

serving for you in an acting capacity, for your respective Principal Office, the 

authority under 5 U.S.C. Section 3595(b)(3)(B), to file written objections to the 

Office of Personnel Management, when appropriate, based on your determination 

that the career Senior Executive Service employees referred failed to meet the 

technical qualifications for applicable position vacancies.

Unless otherwise noted in future delegations of authority, legislative amendments to 

the authorities delegated herein are included in the scope of this delegation.

II. RESERVATIONS

None.

III. REDELEGATION

This authority may not be redelegated.

IV. CERTIFICATION AND EFFECTIVE DATE

This delegation is effective upon certification by the Department’s Principal 

Delegations Control Officer and supersedes all previous delegation of this authority.

___________(Signed)___________ 

Richard W. Riley

OGC Clearance and Date: /s/ R. Wexler, 7/12/96

Certification Date: 7/31/96

Certified by Departmental Delegations Control Officer: /s/ Naty Beetle 

 

Control Number: EA/EH/69
Addressees and PO Control No.

EA/EB/137 – Deputy Secretary

EA/EC/185 – Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights

EA/EE/16 – Under Secretary

EA/EF/83 – Inspector General

EA/EG/79 – General Counsel

EA/EH/69 – Assistant Secretary for Special Education and Rehabilitative Services

EA/EJ/28 - Assistant Secretary for Legislation and Congressional Affairs

EA/EK/86 - Assistant Secretary for Intergovernmental and Interagency Affairs

EA/EL/62 – Chief Financial Officer

EA/EP/244 - Assistant Secretary for Postsecondary Education

EA/ES/54- Assistant Secretary for Elementary and Secondary Education

EA/EV/58 - Assistant Secretary for Vocational and Adult Education

EA/EI/2 - Chief Information Officer

EA/EN/2 - Chief Operating Officer, Federal Student Aid

EA/EQ/2 - Deputy Under Secretary for Safe and Drug-Free Schools

EA/ER/1 - Director, Institute of Education Sciences

EA/EU/2 - Deputy Under Secretary for Innovation and Improvement
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 54 

To prohibit the creation of an immigration-related registry program that 

classifies people on the basis of religion, race, age, gender, ethnicity, 

national origin, nationality, or citizenship. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 5, 2017 

Mr. BOOKER (for himself, Ms. WARREN, Mr. SCHATZ, Mr. MARKEY, Mrs. 

MURRAY, Mr. SANDERS, Mr. LEAHY, Mr. MERKLEY, Ms. HIRONO, and 

Mr. WYDEN) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To prohibit the creation of an immigration-related registry 

program that classifies people on the basis of religion, 

race, age, gender, ethnicity, national origin, nationality, 

or citizenship. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLES. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protect American 

5 Families from Unnecessary Registration and Deportation 

6 Act of 2017’’ or the ‘‘Protect American Families Act’’. 


SSpencer on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 54 IS

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION OF CERTAIN IMMIGRATION-RELATED 

2 REGISTRY PROGRAMS. 

3 (a) PROHIBITION.—Subject to subsection (b) and 

4 notwithstanding any other provision of law, including sec5 tions 263, 265, and 266 of the Immigration and Nation6 ality Act (8 U.S.C. 1303, 1305, and 1306)— 

7 (1) the Department of Homeland Security, the 

8 Department of Justice, or any other Federal depart9 ment may not create or implement a law enforce10 ment or national security program that requires, or 

11 has the effect of causing, people to register or check 

12 in on the basis of religion, race, age, gender, eth13 nicity, national origin, nationality, or citizenship; 

14 and 

15 (2) consistent with the prohibition under para16 graph (1), no Federal funds may be used to create 

17 or implement an immigration registry or check-in 

18 program. 

19 (b) INAPPLICABILITY TO CERTAIN FEDERAL PRO20 GRAMS.—The prohibitions under subsection (a) shall not 

21 apply to any Federal program that— 

22 (1) merely collects and compiles data about 

23 aliens entering or exiting the United States; or 

24 (2) issues visas, grants United States citizen25 ship, confers an immigration benefit to nationals of 


SSpencer on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 54 IS

1 a foreign country, or temporarily or permanently 

2 protects noncitizens from removal. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
§ 516.44 Determination of release authorization. ( a ) *Policy.* DA policy is to make official information reasonably available for use in Federal and state courts and by other governmental bodies unless the information is classified, privileged, or otherwise protected from public disclosure.
( b ) *Releasability factors.* In deciding whether to authorize release of official information, the deciding official should consider the following: ( 1 ) Has the requester complied with DA policy governing the release of official documents in § 516.41(d) of this part.
( 2 ) Is the request unduly burdensome or otherwise inappropriate under the applicable court rules?
( 3 ) Is the disclosure appropriate under the rules of procedure governing the matter in which the request arose?
( 4 ) Would the disclosure violate a statute, executive order, regulation, or directive?
( 5 ) Is the disclosure appropriate under the relevant substantive law concerning privilege?
( 6 ) Would the disclosure reveal information properly classified pursuant to the DOD Information Security Program under AR 380-5, unclassified technical data withheld from public release pursuant to 32 CFR § 250, or other matters exempt from unrestricted disclosure?
( 7 ) Would disclosure interfere with ongoing enforcement proceedings, compromise constitutional rights, reveal the identity of an intelligence source or confidential informant, disclose trade secrets or confidential commercial or financial information, or, otherwise be inappropriate under the circumstances?
( 8 ) Would the disclosure violate any person's expectation of confidentiality or privacy?
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL

THE GENERAL COUNSEL

MEMORANDUM

TO: Deputy General Counsel, Departmental and Legislative Service

Deputy General Counsel, Postsecondary and Regulatory Service ◄▬▬

Deputy General Counsel, Program Service 

FROM: Kent D. Talbert

SUBJECT: Redelegation of Authority to Review and Approve Settlements

I. DELEGATION

Under the authority vested in me by a delegation from the Secretary EA/EG/109, 

certified April 17, 2008, I redelegate to you, and anyone serving for you in an 

acting capacity, the authority to review and concur in any agency settlement 

involving the final resolution of any litigation, involving but not limited to 

administrative or Federal court litigation, in which the Department shall make 

monetary payment for damages, fees, costs, or other relief. This redelegation 

authorizes each addressee to to review and concur in any above-described agency 

settlement within their respective areas of responsibility. 

Unless otherwise specified in future delegations of authority, amendments to the

authority delegated herein are included within the scope of this delegation.

II. RESERVATIONS

 

None.

III. REDELEGATION

You may redelegate this authority.

IV. CERTIFICATION AND EFFECTIVE DATE

This delegation is effective upon certification of the Department's Principal 

Delegations Control Officer and supersedes all previous delegations of this 

authority.
Page 2 – Redelegation of Authority to Review and Approve Settlements

I hereby ratify actions within the scope of this delegation taken by the addressees 

prior to certification of this delegation.

____________/s/___________

 Kent D. Talbert

OGC Concurrence and Date: /s/ David Berthiuame. 5/12/2008

Certified Date: 5/12/2008

Departmental Delegations Control Officer: /s/ Naty G. Beetle

Control Number: EG/EGP/111
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION 

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

MEMORANDUM

TO: Addressees (See Below)

FROM: Director, Risk Management Service

Office of the Secretary

SUBJECT: Redelegation of Authority for Grants and Cooperative Agreements 

I. DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY

Under the authority vested in me from the Secretary by delegation EA/EAR/165, 

certified on March 26, 2008, and except as noted in section II below, I delegate to 

you, to your successor in function, and to anyone serving for you in an acting 

capacity, the authority to perform functions related to the award, management and 

oversight of formula and discretionary grants and cooperative agreements within your 

programmatic authority. This includes the authority to take any action as deemed 

appropriate and necessary to manage and mitigate risks associated with high risk or 

at-risk grants and grantees, within your programmatic authority. 

Unless otherwise noted in future delegations of authority, amendments to the 

authority delegated in this document are included within the scope of this 

delegation.

II. RESERVATIONS

 Unless otherwise noted in existing or future delegations of authority, the 

following are not delegated: 

A. The authority to set administrative policy for formula and discretionary 

grants and cooperative agreements, including issuing Department 

directives, handbooks, and manuals relating to grants and cooperative 

agreements.

B. The authority to impose non-procurement debarments and suspensions and 

to manage enforcement of non-debarments and suspensions. 
Page 2 - Redelegation of Authority for Grants and Cooperative Agreements

C. The authority to issue licenses to individuals to record obligations and 

award grant funds for discretionary grants and cooperative agreements.

D. The authority as final arbiter on cross-Department risk management 

strategies developed to manage and mitigate risks associated with 

Department high-risk or at-risk grants and grantees. 

 

III. REDELEGATION

You may redelegate the authority delegated to you.

IV. CERTIFICATION AND EFFECTIVE DATE

This delegation is effective upon certification by the Department's Principal 

Delegations Control Officer and supersedes all previous delegations of this 

authority. I ratify actions within the scope of this delegation taken by the 

addressees prior to the date of certification.

 

_________/s/____________

 Phil Maestri

OGC Clearance and Date: 3/28/2008

Certified Date: 4/11/2008

Departmental Delegations Control Officer: /s/ Naty G. Beetle

Control Number: EAR/ER/6

ADDRESSEE LIST:

Deputy Secretary 

Assistant Secretary for Special Education and Rehabilitative Services 

Assistant Secretary for Postsecondary Education

Assistant Deputy Secretary for Safe and Drug-Free Schools 

Director, Institute of Education Sciences ◄▬▬

Assistant Secretary for Elementary and Secondary Education

Assistant Deputy Secretary and Director for English Language Acquisition

Assistant Deputy Secretary for Innovation and Improvement

Assistant Secretary for Vocational and Adult Education
Contact Us

#   Surf Your Watershed

***Surf Your Watershed** *(SYW) has provided simple access to a rich collection of watershed information since its release more than 20 years ago. SYW has recently been decommissioned because of technology migration and related security issues.

***Surf Your Watershed*** has been replaced by  ***How’s My Waterway, Version 2***, which incorporates much of SYW's content and expands relevant watershed information. 

          -  Home page 
          -  Integrated Water Analysis 
          -  Ambient Water Quality 
          -  Community Financing 
          -  Drinking Water 
          -  Water Restoration 
          -  Water Quality Models 

Contact Us
#### Terrace Court Realty, Inc., v. Fifth Avenue Realty Corp. et al.

Motion for an order reinstating the *Us pendens*denied, with $10 costs. Concur — Botein, P. J., Rabin, Stevens and Eager, JJ.
Order entered December ,2012

In The 

## Court of [ppeat 

## :Fifth e( gexa at allas

NO. 05-12-00218-CR GAYLAND LAMONT EDWARDS, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 7

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F10-55217-Y



### ORDER The Court REINSTATES the appeal. On October 29, 2012, ordered the trial court to make findings regarding why appellant’s brief had not been filed. On November 29, 2012, we received appellant’s brief together with an extension motion. Therefore, we VACATE the October 29, 2012 order. We GRANT the November 29, 2012 extension motion and ORDER appellant’s brief filed as of the date of this order.

DAVID L. BRJDGL~ 

### JUSTICE