alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
11.204 Solicitation provisions. ( a ) The contracting officer shall insert the provision at 52.211-1, Availability of Specifications Listed in the GSA Index of Federal Specifications, Standards and Commercial Item Descriptions, FPMR Part 101-29, in solicitations that cite specifications listed in the Index that are not furnished with the solicitation.
( b ) The contracting officer shall insert the provision at 52.211-2, Availability of Defense Specifications, Standards, and Data Item Descriptions in the Acquisition Streamlining and Standardization Information System (ASSIST) website, in solicitations that cite specifications available in ASSIST that are not furnished with the solicitation.
( c ) The contracting officer shall insert a provision substantially the same as the provision at 52.211-3, Availability of Specifications Not Listed in the GSA Index of Federal Specifications, Standards and Commercial Item Descriptions, in solicitations that cite specifications that are not listed in the Index and are not furnished with the solicitation, but may be obtained from a designated source.
( d ) The contracting officer shall insert a provision substantially the same as the provision at 52.211-4, Availability for Examination of Specifications Not Listed in the GSA Index of Federal Specifications, Standards and Commercial Item Descriptions, in solicitations that cite specifications that are not listed in the Index and are available for examination at a specified location.
[60 FR 48238, Sept. 18, 1995, as amended at 63 FR 34063, June 22, 1998; 71 FR 228, Jan. 3, 2006; 88 FR 53755, Aug. 8, 2023]
#### Ayers Company *v.*Novelty Textile, Inc.

*John K. Harris,*for the appellee (plaintiff).

*John A. Spector,*for the appellant (defendant).

Argued November 5

decided November 5, 1974

The plaintiff’s motion to dismiss the appeal from the Court of Common Pleas in Windham County is denied.
EXHIBIT 32.2


Certification of the Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with this quarterly report of Espey Mfg. & Electronics Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “report”), I, David O’Neil, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





1.
The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: February 10, 2011








/s/David O’NeilDavid O’NeilTreasurer and Principal Financial Officer
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsModal forced vibration analysis of aerodynamically excited turbosystemsTheoretical aspects of a new capability to determine the vibratory response of turbosystems subjected to aerodynamic excitation are presented. Turbosystems such as advanced turbopropellers with highly swept blades, and axial-flow compressors and turbines can be analyzed using this capability. The capability has been developed and implemented in the April 1984 release of the general purpose finite element program NASTRAN. The dynamic response problem is addressed in terms of the normal modal coordinates of these tuned rotating cyclic structures. Both rigid and flexible hubs/disks are considered. Coriolis and centripetal accelerations, as well as differential stiffness effects are included. Generally non-uniform steady inflow fields and uniform flow fields arbitrarily inclined at small angles with respect to the axis of rotation of the turbosystem are considered sources of aerodynamic excitation. The spatial non-uniformities are considered to be small deviations from a principally uniform inflow. Subsonic and supersonic relative inflows are addressed, with provision for linearly interpolating transonic airloads.Document ID19890009325Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsElchuri, V.*(Aerostructures, Inc. Arlington, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateJuly 1, 1985Subject CategoryStructural MechanicsReport/Patent NumberNASA-CR-174966NAS 1.26:174966Accession Number89N18696Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS3-24387Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19890009325.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
###### Editorial Note on Part 724

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 724 appear at 65 FR 62616, Oct. 19, 2000.

#### § 724.815 Complaints.

A complaint is any correspondence in which it is alleged that a decisional document issued by the NDRB or the SRA contains a specifically indentified violation of 32 CFR part 70 or any references thereto. Complaints will be reviewed pursuant to 32 CFR part 70.
#### In the Matter of Anne B. Anderson, Appellant, v. H. Eliot Kaplan et al., Constituting the State Civil Service Commission, Respondents.

Appeal from an order of a Special Term, Supreme Court, Albany County. Respondents, after examination of petitioner, have found her disqualified on physical grounds. Without alleging that she meets the physical standards of eligibility for the civil service position here in issue, petitioner seeks an order directed to the respondents to place her on an eligible list. Her factual pleading to support this is merely that the details of the physical examination have not been disclosed to her. Whatever other relief petitioner may have to compel or require such disclosure, the mere absence of detailed disclosure does not entitle her on the face of this pleading to be placed on an eligible list. Order unanimously affirmed, without costs.
EXHIBIT 32 (a)

                             CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In  connection  with the  Annual  Report  of Enzo  Biochem,  Inc.,  and
Subsidiaries  ("the  Company")  on Form 10-K for the fiscal  year ended July 31,
2006 as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof
(the  "Report"),  I,  Elazar  Rabbani,  Ph.D.,  Chief  Executive  Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15
(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.




Dated: October 12, 2006                          By: /s/ Elazar Rabbani, Ph.D.
                                                     --------------------------
                                                         Elazar Rabbani, Ph.D.
                                                         Chief Executive Officer



     A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906, or
other  document  authenticating,   acknowledging,   or  otherwise  adopting  the
signature  that  appears in typed form  within  the  electronic  version of this
written statement  required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Act
Commission or its staff upon request.
### §3175b. Expansion of effective food, nutrition, and consumer education services

The purpose of the program provided for under sections 3175a through 3175e of this title is to expand effective food, nutrition, and consumer education services to the greatest practicable number of low-income individuals, including those participating in or eligible to participate in the programs under the Food Stamp Act of 1977 [7 U.S.C. 2011 et seq.], to assist them to—

(1) increase their ability to manage their food budgets, including food stamps and other food assistance;

(2) increase their ability to buy food that satisfies nutritional needs and promotes good health; and

(3) improve their food preparation, storage, safety, preservation, and sanitation practices.

(Pub. L. 99–198, title XV, §1585, Dec. 23, 1985, 99 Stat. 1596.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Food Stamp Act of 1977, referred to in text, subsequently renamed the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008, is Pub. L. 88–525, Aug. 31, 1964, 78 Stat. 703, which is classified generally to chapter 51 (§2011 et seq.) of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 2011 of this title and Tables.

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Food Security Act of 1985, and not as part of the National Agricultural Research, Extension, and Teaching Policy Act of 1977 which comprises this chapter.
#### T. V. Beckwith, trading as Snyder-Beckwith Company, appellee, v. David F. Curtin, appellant.

Gen. No. 29,380.

Action to recover commission on sale of real estate. Judgment for plaintiff. Appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Daniel P. Trude, Judge, presiding. Heard in the first division of this court for the first district at the March term, 1924.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed April 13, 1925.

James R. Glass and James M. Slattery, for appellant.

Mills *&*Howe, for appellee.

Mr. Justice Johnston

delivered the opinion of the court.
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 137 

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

in the One Hundred Eighteenth Congress. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 17, 2023 

Mr. MCCAUL submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on House Administration 

RESOLUTION 

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on 

Foreign Affairs in the One Hundred Eighteenth Congress. 

1 Resolved, 

2 SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES. 

3 For the expenses of the Committee on Foreign Af4 fairs (hereafter in this resolution referred to as the ‘‘Com5 mittee’’), including the expenses of all staff salaries, there 

6 shall be paid, out of the applicable accounts of the House 

7 of Representatives for committee salaries and expenses, 

8 not more than $21,653,516 for the One Hundred Eight9 eenth Congress. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HRES 137 IH 

1 SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS. 

2 Of the amount specified in section 1— 

3 (1) not more than $10,826,758 shall be avail4 able for expenses incurred during the period begin5 ning at noon on January 3, 2023, and ending imme6 diately before noon on January 3, 2024; and 

7 (2) not more than $10,826,758 shall be avail8 able for expenses incurred during the period begin9 ning at noon on January 3, 2024, and ending imme10 diately before noon on January 3, 2025. 

11 SEC. 3. VOUCHERS. 

12 Payments under this resolution shall be made on 

13 vouchers authorized by the Committee, signed by the 

14 Chairman of the Committee, and approved in the manner 

15 directed by the Committee on House Administration. 

16 SEC. 4. REGULATIONS. 

17 Amounts made available under this resolution shall 

18 be expended in accordance with regulations prescribed by 

19 the Committee on House Administration. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
### 12866 Review: Response to Interagency comments, 2012 CUE NPRM Jeremy Arling to: Frey, Nathan J. 08/18/2011 01:22 PM Cc: David Donaldson, Cindy Newberg
Nate Here is a draft incorporating suggestions from interagency review.

EO12866MethylBromideCUE2060-AQ83NPRM20110818.docx
Jeremy Arling U.S. EPA Stratospheric Protection Division Office of Atmospheric Programs Mail Code: 6205J 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, D.C. 20460-0001 202-343-9055 202-343-2338 (f) arling. jeremy @epa.gov
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > The Consumer Price Index : History and Techniques

              																	United States. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 						*The Consumer Price Index : History and Techniques : Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 1517*,										1966,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/169,			accessed on September 6, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
(July 6, 1960)

#### Margaret Boyle, Respondent, v. Judy Cab Corp., et al., Defendants, and Wendy Cab Corp., et al., Appellants.

Motion for a stay of examination before trial granted on condition that appellants be ready to argue or submit the appeal on October 3, 1960, for which day the appeal is ordered to be placed on the calendar. The record and appellants’ brief must be served and filed on or before September 1, 1960. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Ughetta, Christ and Pette, JJ., concur.
#### *Lawrence Sossna, as Executor of Morton M. Sossna, Deceased, Appellant, v Joseph E. Golonka, Respondent.*

*Judgment of the Supreme*Court, Westchester County, entered May 10, 1977, affirmed, without costs or disbursements. No opinion. (The plaintiff has withdrawn his appeal from an *order of the same court dated June 7, 1977.) Mollen, P. J., Hopkins, Martus*cello and Shapiro, JJ., concur.
§ 935.102 Information. ( a ) Any offense may be prosecuted by a written information signed by the Island Attorney. However, if the offense is one for which issue of a citation is authorized by this part and a citation for the offense has been issued, the citation serves as an information.
( b ) A copy of the information shall be delivered to the accused, or his counsel, as soon as practicable after it is filed.
( c ) Each count of an information may charge one offense only and must be particularized sufficiently to identify the place, the time, and the subject matter of the alleged offense. It shall refer to the provision of law under which the offense is charged, but any error in this reference or its omission may be corrected by leave of Court at any time before sentence and is not grounds for reversal of a conviction if the error or omission did not mislead the accused to his prejudice.
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>
          
<ARTICLE> UT
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      566,713
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                         80
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                          35,417
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                        47,610
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 649,820
<COMMON>                                        15,741
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      118,295
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                             53,648
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 187,684
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     12,000
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           231,945
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                              23,000
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                       30
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 195,161
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  649,820
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                       37,815
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                             4,220
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      21,669
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      25,889
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                         11,926
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                  59
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                  11,985
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         4,003
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,982
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        203
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                    7,779
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                         4,049
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                        3,671
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                          19,394
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0<F1>
<FN>
<F1>All amounts in thousands of dollars except per share amounts.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT(12)**

 

 

**COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES**

** **
| ** **                                                           | ** ** | **Twelve**                  | ** **     |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|-----------------------------|----------------|
| ** **                                                           | ** ** | **Months Ended**       | ** **     |
| ** **                                                           | ** ** | **June 30, 2008** | ** **     |
|                                                                 |       |                        |           |
| Income before  provision for income taxes and fixed charges (Note A) |       | $                           | 96,072,564     |   |
|                                                                 |       |                        |           |
| Fixed charges:                                                       |       |                        |           |
| Interest on  long-term debt                                          |       | $                           | 33,026,852     |   |
| Interest on  short-term debt                                         |       | 2,441,365                   |           |
| Interest on note  payable to securitization trust                    |       | 4,250,000                   |           |
| Other interest                                                       |       | 1,058,273                   |           |
| Rental expense  representative of an interest factor (Note B)        |       | 5,298,010                   |           |
| ** **                                                           | ** ** | ** **                  | ** **     |
| **Total  fixed charges**                                             | ** ** | **$**                       | **46,074,500** | ** ** |
| ** **                                                           | ** ** | ** **                  | ** **     |
| Ratio of  earnings to fixed charges                                  |       | 2.09x                       |           |

 

NOTE A:           For the purpose of determining earnings in thecalculation of the ratio, net income from continuing operations has beenincreased by the provision for income taxes, non-operating income taxes,minority interest and by the sum of fixed charges as shown above.

 

NOTE B:             One-third of rental expense (which approximates theinterest factor).

 

----