alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §6410. Petition and review

#### (a) Petition

#### (1) In general

A person subject to an order issued under this chapter may file with the Secretary a petition—

(A) stating that the order, any provision of the order, or any obligation imposed in connection with the order is not established in accordance with law; and

(B) requesting a modification of the order or an exemption from the order.

#### (2) Hearings

The petitioner shall be given the opportunity for a hearing on the petition, in accordance with regulations issued by the Secretary.

#### (3) Ruling

After the hearing, the Secretary shall make a ruling on the petition, which shall be final if in accordance with law.

#### (b) Review

#### (1) Commencement of action

The district courts of the United States in any district in which the person who is a petitioner under subsection (a) resides or carries on business are hereby vested with jurisdiction to review the ruling on such person's petition, if a complaint for that purpose is filed within 20 days after the date of the entry of a ruling by the Secretary under subsection (a).

#### (2) Process

Service of process in such proceedings shall be conducted in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

#### (3) Remands

If the court determines that such ruling is not in accordance with law, the court shall remand the matter to the Secretary with directions either—

(A) to make such ruling as the court shall determine to be in accordance with law; or

(B) to take such further proceedings as, in the opinion of the court, the law requires.

(Pub. L. 101–624, title XIX, §1999K, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 3921.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, referred to in subsec. (b)(2), are set out in the Appendix to Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.
Connecticut Department of

ENERGY &

ENVIRONMENTAL

PROTECTION

March 5, 2012

David M. Webster

Chief, Industrial Permits Branch

Office of Ecosystem Protection

U.S. EPA, Region 1

5 Post Office Square, Suite 100

Boston, MA 02109-3912

Re: Vessel General Pe~anit (VGP) and Small Vessel General Permit (sVGP)

Coastal Zone Management Program (CZMA) Consistency Determination

Dear Mr. Webster:

The Office of Long Island Sound Programs has reviewed your request for federal consistency

concurrence with the proposed general NPDES permits for discharges incidental to the normal operation

of vessels pursuant to Section 307(c)(I) of the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972, as amended, and

Subpa~’t C of 15 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Pa~ 930.

As you have pointed out, we are concurrently reviewing these draft permits for compliance with

Connecticut’s water quality standards under Clean Water Act (CWA) Section 303, since they are subject

to State water quality certification under CWA Section 401. Therefore we have elected to waive our

consistency review under CZMA Section 307(c)(1), since any considerations pe~’taining to the

enforceable polices of the approved Connecticut Coastal Management Program would be subsumed

within our review of the draft permits under the applicable provisions of the Connecticut Water Quality

Standards, effective February 25, 201 i. We will be submitting to you our determination on the 401 Water

Quality Certification by the extended deadline of June 30, 2012.

Thank you for providing consistency determinations and supporting information for our revie~v. Should

you have any questions regarding these consistency determinations or any other coastal management

matter, please contact DeAva Lambert of my staff at (860) 424-3207.

Sincerely,

~. Thompson, Director

Office of Long Island Sound Programs

Bureau of Water Protection and Land Reuse

BPT/dkl

Enc.

cc: Fred Anders, NY DOS

Betsey Wingfield

79 Elm Street ° Hartford, CT 06106-5127

www.ct.gov/deep

Affirmative Acfion/Equal Opportunity Employer
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 7 (Tuesday, January 12, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 2458]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-00326]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration

[Docket No. DEA-762]


Importer of Controlled Substances Application: S&B Pharma LLC dba 
Norac Pharma

AGENCY: Drug Enforcement Administration, Justice.

ACTION: Notice of application.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: S&B Pharma LLC, dba: Norac Pharma has applied to be registered 
as an importer of basic class(es) of controlled substance(s). Refer to 
Supplemental Information listed below for further drug information.

DATES: Registered bulk manufacturers of the affected basic class(es), 
and applicants therefore, may file written comments on or objections to 
the issuance of the proposed registration on or before February 11, 
2021. Such persons may also file a written request for a hearing on the 
application on or before February 11, 2021.

ADDRESSES: Written comments should be sent to: Drug Enforcement 
Administration, Attention: DEA Federal Register Representative/DPW, 
8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152. All requests for a 
hearing must be sent to: Drug Enforcement Administration, Attn: 
Administrator, 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152. All 
requests for a hearing should also be sent to: (1) Drug Enforcement 
Administration, Attn: Hearing Clerk/OALJ, 8701 Morrissette Drive, 
Springfield, Virginia 22152; and (2) Drug Enforcement Administration, 
Attn: DEA Federal Register Representative/DPW, 8701 Morrissette Drive, 
Springfield, Virginia 22152.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with 21 CFR 1301.34(a), this 
is notice that on August 25, 2020, S&B Pharma LLC, dba: Norac Pharma, 
405 South Motor Avenue, Azusa, California 91702, applied to be 
registered as an importer of the following basic class(es) of 
controlled substance(s):

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                           Drug
          Controlled substance             code          Schedule
------------------------------------------------------------------------
4-Anilino-N-phenethyl-4-piperidine          8333  II
 (ANPP).
Tapentadol.............................     9780  II
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The company plans to import the listed controlled substances in 
bulk for the manufacture of controlled substances for distribution to 
its customers. No other activity for these drug codes is authorized for 
this registration.
    Approval of permit applications will occur only when the 
registrant's business activity is consistent with what is authorized 
under 21 U.S.C. 952(a)(2). Authorization will not extend to the import 
of Food and Drug Administration-approved or non-approved finished 
dosage forms for commercial sale.

William T. McDermott,
Assistant Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2021-00326 Filed 1-11-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed September 15, 2021.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D20-1712

Lower Tribunal No. 16-14544

________________

Azran Miami 2, LLC,

Appellant,

vs.

US Bank Trust, N.A., etc.,

Appellee.

An Appeal from non-final orders from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade 

County, Pedro P. Echarte, Jr., Judge.

Jacobs Legal PLLC, and Bruce Jacobs, for appellant.

Locke Lord LLP, and Steven J. Brotman (West Palm Beach), for 

appellee.

Before EMAS, MILLER and LOBREE, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.
2

Affirmed. See U.S. Bank Nat. Ass'n v. Paiz, 68 So. 3d 940, 944 

(Fla. 3d DCA 2011) (holding: “To entitle a movant to an evidentiary hearing 

on a motion for relief from judgment, a rule 1.540(b)(3) motion must specify 

the fraud with particularity and explain why the fraud, if it exists, would entitle 

the movant to have the judgment set aside. Flemenbaum v. Flemenbaum, 

636 So. 2d 579, 580 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994). ‘If a motion does not set forth a 

basis for relief on its face, then an evidentiary hearing is unnecessary, the 

time and expense of needless litigation is avoided, and the policy of 

preserving the finality of judgments is enhanced.’ Coleman (Parent) 

Holdings, Inc. v. Morgan Stanley & Co., 20 So. 3d 952, 955 (Fla. 4th DCA 

2009). The matter alleged must affect the outcome of the case and not 

merely be ‘de minimis.’ Thus, to obtain a hearing on a rule 1.540(b)(3) 

motion, the law requires a movant ‘to demonstrate a prima facie case of 

fraud, not just nibble at the edges of the concept.’ Hembd v. Dauria, 859 So. 

2d 1238, 1240 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003)”) (citations and quotations omitted). 

See also Rusniaczek v. Tableau Fine Art Grp., Inc., 139 So. 3d 355, 

357-58 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014) (explaining that the “purpose of this specificity 

requirement is to permit the court ‘to determine whether the movant has 

made a prima facie showing which would justify relief from judgment,’ and is 

not merely rehashing matters explored at trial”) (quotation omitted).
12.302 Tailoring of provisions and clauses for the acquisition of commercial products and commercial services. ( a ) *General.* The provisions and clauses established in this subpart are intended to address, to the maximum extent practicable, commercial market practices for a wide range of potential Government acquisitions of commercial products and commercial services. However, because of the broad range of commercial products and commercial services acquired by the Government, variations in commercial practices, and the relative volume of the Government's acquisitions in the specific market, contracting officers may, within the limitations of this subpart, and after conducting appropriate market research, tailor the provision at 52.212-1, Instructions to Offerors-Commercial Products and Commercial Services, and the clause at 52.212-4, Contract Terms and Conditions-Commercial Products and Commercial Services, to adapt to the market conditions for each acquisition.
( b ) *Tailoring 52.212-4, Contract Terms and Conditions—Commercial Products and Commercial Services* The following paragraphs of the clause at 52.212-4, Contract Terms and Conditions—Commercial Products and Commercial Services, implement statutory requirements and shall not be tailored— ( 1 ) Assignments;
( 2 ) Disputes;
( 3 ) Payment (except as provided in subpart 32.11);
( 4 ) Invoice;
( 5 ) Other compliances;
( 6 ) Compliance with laws unique to Government contracts; and
( 7 ) Unauthorized obligations.
( c ) *Tailoring inconsistent with customary commercial practice.* The contracting officer shall not tailor any clause or otherwise include any additional terms or conditions in a solicitation or contract for commercial products or commercial services in a manner that is inconsistent with customary commercial practice for the item being acquired unless a waiver is approved in accordance with agency procedures. The request for waiver must describe the customary commercial practice found in the marketplace, support the need to include a term or condition that is inconsistent with that practice and include a determination that use of the customary commercial practice is inconsistent with the needs of the Government. A waiver may be requested for an individual or class of contracts for that specific item.
( d ) Tailoring shall be by addenda to the solicitation and contract. The contracting officer shall indicate in Block 27a of the SF 1449 if addenda are attached. These addenda may include, for example, a continuation of the schedule of supplies/services to be acquired from blocks 18 through 21 of the SF 1449; a continuation of the description of the supplies/services being acquired; further elaboration of any other item(s) on the SF 1449; any other terms or conditions necessary for the performance of the proposed contract (such as options, ordering procedures for indefinite-delivery type contracts, warranties, contract financing arrangements, etc.).
[60 FR 48241, Sept. 18, 1995, as amended at 61 FR 45772, Aug. 29, 1996; 61 FR 67430, Dec. 20, 1996; 62 FR 264, Jan. 2, 1997; 78 FR 37688, June 21, 2013; 86 FR 61023, Nov. 4, 2021; 87 FR 24844, Apr. 26, 2022]
```

[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 5 (Friday, January 8, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1490-1491]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-00133]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EL21-23-000]

Startrans IO, L.L.C.; Notice of Institution of Section 206 
Proceeding and Refund Effective Date

    On December 30, 2020, the Commission issued an order in Docket No. 
EL21-23-000, pursuant to section 206 of the Federal Power Act (FPA), 16 
U.S.C. 824e, instituting an investigation into whether Startrans IO, 
L.L.C.'s proposed rate reduction to its transmission revenue 
requirement and proposed revisions to its transmission owner tariff are 
unjust, unreasonable, unduly discriminatory, or preferential, or 
otherwise unlawful. Startrans IO, L.L.C., 173 FERC ] 61,280 (2020).
    The refund effective date in Docket No. Docket No. EL21-23-000, 
established pursuant to section 206(b) of the FPA, will be the date of 
publication of this notice in the Federal Register.
    Any interested person desiring to be heard in Docket No. EL21-23-
000 must file a notice of intervention or motion to intervene, as 
appropriate, with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, in 
accordance with Rule 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and 
Procedure, 18 CFR 385.214 (2020), within 21 days of the date of 
issuance of the order.
    In addition to publishing the full text of this document in the 
Federal Register, the Commission provides all interested persons an 
opportunity to view and/or print the contents of this document via the 
internet through the Commission's Home Page (http://www.ferc.gov) using 
the ``eLibrary'' link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three 
digits in the docket number field to access the document. At this time, 
the Commission has suspended access to the Commission's Public 
Reference Room, due to the proclamation declaring a National Emergency 
concerning the Novel Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19), issued by the 
President on March 13, 2020. For assistance, contact FERC at 
[email protected] or call toll-free, (886) 208-3676 or TYY, 
(202) 502-8659.
    The Commission strongly encourages electronic filings of comments, 
protests and interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFile'' link at 
http://www.ferc.gov. In lieu of electronic filing, you may submit a 
paper copy. Submissions sent via the U.S. Postal Service must be 
addressed to: Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory

[[Page 1491]]

Commission, 888 First Street, NE, Room 1A, Washington, DC 20426. 
Submissions sent via any other carrier must be addressed to: Kimberly 
D. Bose, Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 12225 Wilkins 
Avenue, Rockville, Maryland 20852.

    Dated: January 4, 2021.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-00133 Filed 1-7-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
```
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Escalade, Incorporated (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending July 10, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert J. Keller, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:







(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/s/ Robert J. KellerChief Executive OfficerAugust 02, 2010
Case: 1:11-cv-08993 Document #: 1 Filed: 12/20/11 Page 1 of 14 PageID #:1
Case: 1:11-cv-08993 Document #: 1 Filed: 12/20/11 Page 2 of 14 PageID #:2
Case: 1:11-cv-08993 Document #: 1 Filed: 12/20/11 Page 3 of 14 PageID #:3
Case: 1:11-cv-08993 Document #: 1 Filed: 12/20/11 Page 4 of 14 PageID #:4
Case: 1:11-cv-08993 Document #: 1 Filed: 12/20/11 Page 5 of 14 PageID #:5
Case: 1:11-cv-08993 Document #: 1 Filed: 12/20/11 Page 6 of 14 PageID #:6
Case: 1:11-cv-08993 Document #: 1 Filed: 12/20/11 Page 7 of 14 PageID #:7
Case: 1:11-cv-08993 Document #: 1 Filed: 12/20/11 Page 8 of 14 PageID #:8
Case: 1:11-cv-08993 Document #: 1 Filed: 12/20/11 Page 9 of 14 PageID #:9
Case: 1:11-cv-08993 Document #: 1 Filed: 12/20/11 Page 10 of 14 PageID #:10
Case: 1:11-cv-08993 Document #: 1 Filed: 12/20/11 Page 11 of 14 PageID #:11
Case: 1:11-cv-08993 Document #: 1 Filed: 12/20/11 Page 12 of 14 PageID #:12
Case: 1:11-cv-08993 Document #: 1 Filed: 12/20/11 Page 13 of 14 PageID #:13
Case: 1:11-cv-08993 Document #: 1 Filed: 12/20/11 Page 14 of 14 PageID #:14
#### PEOPLE ex rel. COMMISSIONER OF PUBLIC CHARITIES, Repondent, v. THOMPSON, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

November 20, 1903.)

Proceeding by the people, on the relation of the commissioner of public charities, on complaint of Carrie E. Thompson, against Allan P. Thompson.

A. Rosenthal, for appellant.

H. Stiefel, for respondent.

No opinion. Order affirmed.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

60 

CAF 11-01770 

PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., PERADOTTO, CARNI, WHALEN, AND MARTOCHE, JJ. 

 

IN THE MATTER OF ANNASTASIA C. 

--------------------------------------- 

CATTARAUGUS COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL ORDER

SERVICES, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT; 

 

CAROL C., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. 

(APPEAL NO. 1.) 

D.J. & J.A. CIRANDO, ESQS., SYRACUSE (ELIZABETH deV. MOELLER OF

COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

STEPHEN J. RILEY, OLEAN, FOR PETITIONER-RESPONDENT. 

SCHAVON R. MORGAN, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD, MACHIAS, FOR ANNASTASIA C. 

 

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Cattaraugus County

(Larry M. Himelein, J.), entered July 7, 2011 in a proceeding pursuant

to Social Services Law § 384-b. The order, among other things,

adjudged that respondent had permanently neglected the subject child

and transferred guardianship and custody of the child to petitioner. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed without costs.

Entered: February 1, 2013 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-25-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-28-1999
<CASH>                                           6,689
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,689
<ALLOWANCES>                                       360
<INVENTORY>                                      4,570
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                30,013
<PP&E>                                          10,475
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,652
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  34,788
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,343
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,548
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    34,788
<SALES>                                          8,295
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,295
<CGS>                                            4,877
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,992
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    18
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 177
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,231
<INCOME-TAX>                                       431
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                835
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       835
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.10


</TABLE>
China

Mongolia

North

Korea

South

Korea

Japan

Sakhalin

Lake

Baikal

Sea of

Okhotsk

Sea of

Japan

Yellow

Sea

East China

Sea

Philippine

Sea

Kazakhstan

Boundary representation is

not necessarily authoritative.

Demarcation

Line

Russia

Sakhalin 

(Far East)

Amur

Kovykta

gasfield

East Siberia

West Siberia

DI Cartography Center/MPG 770588AI (G00132) 6-05

Selected Natural Gas Pipelines to China

0 250 500 Miles

0 250 500 Kilometers

Beijing

Nakhodka

Angarsk

Tayshet

Harbin

Daqing

Chita

Novosibirsk

Khabarovsk Khabarovsk habarovsk

Tynda

Omsk

Surgut

Karamay

Dushanzi

Urumqi

Yakutsk

Komsomol’sk

Okha

Skovorodino

Tomsk

Pavlodar

Gas pipeline

Proposed gas pipeline

Producing oil and gas region

Prospective oil and gas region
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth ___________________________

No. 02-19-00003-CR

___________________________

On Appeal from the 372nd District Court

Tarrant County, Texas

Trial Court No. 1510854D

Before Bassel, J.; Sudderth, C.J.; and Womack, J.

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

STEVEN DEAN PHAM, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT

Appellant has filed a voluntary motion to dismiss his appeal. Because we have 

not yet decided this case, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 42.2(a), 43.2(f).

Per Curiam

Do Not Publish

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

Delivered: June 6, 2019
#### In the Matter of Ella Wade et al., against Temporary State Housing Rent Commission.

Motion for a stay denied, with $10 costs. Concur — Botein, P .J., Breitel, McNally and Stevens, JJ.