alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 236.7 DoD's DIB CS Program requirements. ( a ) To participate in the DIB CS Program, a contractor must own or operate a covered contractor information system and shall execute the standardized FA with the Government (available during the application process), which implements the requirements set forth in §§ 236.5 and 236.6.
( b ) In order for DIB CS Program participants to receive classified cyber threat information electronically, the company must be a cleared defense contractor and must: ( 1 ) Have an existing active facility clearance level (FCL) to at least the Secret level in accordance with 32 CFR part 117;
( 2 ) Have or acquire a Communication Security (COMSEC) account in accordance with 32 CFR part 117, which provides procedures and requirements for COMSEC activities;
( 3 ) Have or acquire approved safeguarding for at least Secret information, and continue to qualify under 32 CFR part 117 for retention of its FCL and approved safeguarding; and
( 4 ) Obtain access to DoD's secure voice and data transmission systems supporting the voluntary DIB CS Program.
[89 FR 17749, Mar. 12, 2024]
No. 230.

#### C. C. Taft Company *v.*State of Iowa.

Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Iowa.

Argued March 12, 1920.

Decided March 15, 1920.

*Mr. Fred P. Carr*and *Mr. Robert M. Haines*for plaintiff in error, submitted.

*Mr. F. C.*David*570
      *son,*with whom *Mr. H. M. Havner*was on the brief, for defendant in error.

*569
      *Per Curiam.*

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of the Act of September 6, 1916, c. 448, § 6, 39 Stat. 726, 727.
Appeal No. 75-12.

#### William Tripodi *et al. v.*Hospital Service Corporation of Rhode Island.

*Zimmerman, Roszkowski & Brenner, Joseph J. Roszkowski,*for plaintiffs. *Tillinghast, Collins & Graham, Peter J. McGinn, Robert W. Edwards, Jr.,*for defendant, Blue Cross of Rhode Island, Inc.

Motion of defendant to affirm the judgment of the Superior Court pursuant to Rule 16(g) is granted.
II 

Calendar No. 75 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 583 

To amend the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 to 

authorize COPS grantees to use grant funds to hire veterans as career 

law enforcement officers, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 8, 2017 

Mr. CORNYN (for himself, Ms. KLOBUCHAR, Mr. GRASSLEY, Mr. 

BLUMENTHAL, Mr. TILLIS, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, Mr. HATCH, Mr. HELLER, 

Mr. CRUZ, Mr. BLUNT, Mr. COONS, Mr. COTTON, Ms. HEITKAMP, Mr. 

MANCHIN, Mr. SULLIVAN, Mr. WHITEHOUSE, Mr. DONNELLY, Mr. 

YOUNG, Mr. DURBIN, Ms. HIRONO, Mrs. ERNST, and Mr. KENNEDY) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

MAY 11, 2017 

Reported by Mr. GRASSLEY, without amendment 

A BILL 

To amend the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets 

Act of 1968 to authorize COPS grantees to use grant 

funds to hire veterans as career law enforcement officers, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 583 RS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘American Law En3 forcement Heroes Act of 2017’’. 

4 SEC. 2. PRIORITIZING HIRING AND TRAINING OF VET5 ERANS. 

6 Section 1701(b)(2) of title I of the Omnibus Crime 

7 Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 

8 3796dd(b)(2)) is amended by inserting ‘‘, including by 

9 prioritizing the hiring and training of veterans (as defined 

10 in section 101 of title 38, United States Code)’’ after ‘‘Na11 tion’’. 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS

sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 75 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 583 

A BILL 

To amend the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe 

enforcement officers, and for other purposes. to use grant funds to hire veterans as career law Streets Act of 1968 to authorize COPS grantees 

MAY 11, 2017 

Reported without amendment 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
# Sheet1

Alabama

Alaska

American_Samoa

Arizona

Arkansas

California

Colorado

Connecticut

Delaware

District_of_Columbia

Florida

Georgia

GRAND_TOTAL

Guam

Hawaii

Idaho

Illinois

Indian_Tribes_Set_Aside

Indiana

Iowa

Kansas

Kentucky

Louisiana

Maine

Marshall_Islands

Maryland

Massachusetts

Michigan

Micronesia

Minnesota

Mississippi

Missouri

Montana

Nebraska

Nevada

New_Hampshire

New_Jersey

New_Mexico

New_York

North_Carolina

North_Dakota

North_Dakota

Northern_Marianas

Ohio

Oklahoma

Oregon

Other_Non_State_Allocations

Palau

Pennsylvania

Puerto_Rico

Rhode_Island

South_Carolina

South_Dakota

Tennessee

Texas

Utah

Vermont

Virgin_Islands

Virginia

Washington

West_Virginia

Wisconsin

Wyoming

# Sheet2

# Sheet3
###### Editorial Note on Part 842

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 842 appear at 81 FR 83688, Nov. 22, 2016.

#### § 842.110 Statute of limitations.

The United States or the injured party on behalf of the United States must file suit within 3 years after an action accrues. This is usually 3 years after the initial treatment is provided in a federal medical facility or after the initial payment is made by CHAMPUS, whichever is first.

[55 FR 2809, Jan. 29, 1990. Redesignated at 81 FR 83698, Nov. 22, 2016]
### **CHAPTER 73—FARMLAND PROTECTION POLICY**

Sec.
4201.
General provisions.
4202.
Identifying effects of Federal programs on conversion of farmland to nonagricultural uses.
4203.
Existing policies and procedures; review, etc.
4204.
Technical assistance.
4205.
Farmland resource information.
4206.
Grants, contracts, etc., authority.
4207.
Reporting requirement.
4208.
Limitations.
4209.
Prohibition on maintenance of actions.
#### BURHANS & BLACK CO., Respondent, v. COHEN, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

January 27, 1903.)

Action by the Burhans & Black Company against Levi Cohen.

No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs.
June 25, 2015

Joseph Adams

18702 Old Field Road

New Buffalo, MI 49117

Dear Mr. Adams:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from 

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can not process your 

request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We entered your June 19, 2015 exemption] into the public docket (No. FAA-2015-2398), but 

we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does not comply

with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, 

you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the 

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.
2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brenda Robeson

Program Analyst, Airmen and 

 Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
6/22/2015 Regulations.gov ­ Other Document

http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=FAA­2015­2398­0001 1/2

Adams Design & Print - Exemption/Rulemaking

This Other document was issued by the Federal Aviation

Administration (FAA)

For related information, Open Docket Folder

Content

Requesting to use my drone for my business­ Adams Design &

Print for aerial photography for custom homes and video for

commercial companies / internet business advertising. Also for

visual inspections for insurance companies, nurseries, etc...

Comment Now!

ID: FAA­2015­2398­0001

Document Information

Date Posted:

Jun 19, 2015

Show More Details

Submitter Information

Submitter Name:

Joseph Adams

Mailing Address:

18702 OldField Road

City:

New Buffalo

Country:

United States

State or Province:

MI

ZIP/Postal Code:

49117

Comments

0

Docket Information

This document is contained in

FAA­2015­2398

Related Dockets:

None

Related RINs:

Comments Received*
### §428a. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 428a was editorially reclassified as section 2268a of this title.
### **CHAPTER 7—INSECT PESTS GENERALLY**
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 2 (Tuesday, January 5, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 317-318]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-29118]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health & Human 
Development; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning

[[Page 318]]

individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of 
which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal 
privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Child Health and Human 
Development Initial Review Group; Biobehavioral and Behavioral 
Sciences Subcommittee.
    Date: February 25, 2021.
    Time: 10:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: NIH/NACHHD 6710B, 6710B Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 
20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Clay Mash, Ph.D., Scientific Review Branch, 
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human 
Development, NIH, 6710B Rockledge Drive, Rm. 2131A, Bethesda, MD 
20892, (301) 496-6866, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#3954584a515a795458505517575051175e564f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="711c10021912311c10181d5f1f18195f161e07">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, 
Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 
93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, 
Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: December 29, 2020.
Ronald J. Livingston, Jr.,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2020-29118 Filed 1-4-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Anna Stearns, Respondent, v. City of Poughkeepsie, Defendant, and Poughkeepsie Realty Company, Inc., Appellant.

In an action to recover damages for personal injury, defendant Poughkeepsie Realty Company, Inc., appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated June *9027, 1963, which, on reargument, adhered to the court’s original decision and denied said defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as to it. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. The record presents an issue of fact as to ownership and control of the area where the accident happened. Beldoek, P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. William Walker, Appellant.

In a *coram nobis*proceeding, the defendant appeals from an order of the County Court, Kings County, dated August 23, 1961, denying, without a hearing, his application to vacate a judgment of said court, rendered February 6,1953, after a jury trial, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, and sentencing him as a second felony offender to serve a term of 15 to 60 years. Order affirmed. This application is made on the ground that a confession made by the defendant to an Assistant District Attorney was coerced and that error was committed upon the trial by the admission of evidence relating to such confession. This identical issue was previously raised by the defendant and was adjudicated adversely to him on his appeal from the judgment of conviction *(People*v. *Walker,*284 App. Div. 1068). Hence, he is not now entitled to relitigate the same issue (cf. *People*v. *Caminito,*3 N Y 2d 596, 601; *People ex rel. Baumgart*v. *Martin,*9 N Y 2d 351, 354-355). Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Hill and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
§ 750.26 The administrative claim. ( a ) *Proper claimant.* See § 750.5 of this part.
( b ) *Claim presented by agent or legal representative.* A claim filed by an agent or legal representative will be filed in the name of the claimant; be signed by the agent or legal representative; show the title or legal capacity of the person signing; and be accompanied by evidence of the individual's authority to file a claim on behalf of the claimant.
( c ) *Proper claim.* A claim is a notice in writing to the appropriate Federal agency of an incident giving rise to Government liability under the FTCA. It must include a demand for money damages in a definite sum for property damage, personal injury, or death alleged to have occurred by reason of the incident. The Attorney General's regulations specify that the claim be filed on a Standard Form 95 or other written notification of the incident. If a letter or other written notification is used, it is essential that it set forth the same basic information required by Standard Form 95. Failure to do so may result in a determination that the administrative claim is incomplete. A suit may be dismissed on the ground of lack of subject matter jurisdiction based on claimant's failure to present a proper claim as required by 28 U.S.C. 2675(a).
( d ) *Presentment.* A claim is deemed presented when received by the Navy in proper form. A claim against another agency, mistakenly addressed to or filed with the Navy shall be transferred to the appropriate agency, if ascertainable, or returned to the claimant. A claimant presenting identical claims with more than one agency should identify every agency to which the claim is submitted on every claim form presented. Claims officers shall coordinate with all other affected agencies and ensure a lead agency is designated. 28 CFR 14.2.
<PAGE>


                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
on Form S-8 of Elron Electronic Industries Ltd. (File No. 333-10570) of our
report dated February 12, 2003, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets
of Given Imaging Ltd. as of December 31, 2002 and 2001, and the related
consolidated statements of operations, shareholder's equity and cash flows for
each of the years in the three year period ended December 31, 2002, which
are included in the Elron Electronic Industries Ltd. Annual Report on Form 20-F
for the year ended December 31, 2002.

/s/ Somekh Chaikin

Somekh Chaikin
Certified Public Accountants (Isr.)
A member of KPMG International

Tel Aviv, Israel
June 25, 2003
#### Ricarda Maizonet, Respondent, v. Lee Properties, Inc., et al., Appellants.

Order, denying motion to dismiss complaint for failure to prosecute, dated February 10, 1960, unanimously reversed, on the law and on the facts, and in the exercise of discretion, with $20 costs and disbursements to defendants-appellants, and the motion granted, with $10 costs. Neither the belated filing of the note of issue nor the vague allegations regarding settlement discussions excuses the 28-month delay *(Nigro*v. *City of New York,*3 A D 2d 987; cf. *Trapani*v. *Samuels,*3 A D 2d 861). Moreover, no affidavit of merit was submitted in opposition to the motion *(Gallagher*v. *Clafmgton, Inc.,*7 A D 2d 627). Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, Yalente and Bergan, JJ.
#### 1252.239-92 Information and Communication Technology Accessibility Notice.

As prescribed in 1239.203-70(a), insert the following provision:

# Information and Communication Technology Accessibility Notice (NOV 2022)

(a) Any offeror responding to this solicitation must comply with established DOT Information and Communication Technology (ICT) (formerly known as Electronic and Information (EIT)) accessibility standards. Information about Section 508 is available at *https://www.section508.gov/.*

(b) The Section 508 accessibility standards applicable to this solicitation are stated in the clause at 1252.239-93, Information and Communication Technology Accessibility. In order to facilitate the Government's determination whether proposed ICT supplies and services
meet applicable Section 508 accessibility standards, offerors must submit appropriate Section 508 Checklists, in accordance with the checklist completion instructions. The purpose of the checklists is to assist DOT acquisition and program officials in determining whether proposed ICT supplies or information, documentation and services support conform to applicable Section 508 accessibility standards. The checklists allow offerors or developers to self-evaluate their supplies and document—in detail—whether they conform to a specific Section 508 accessibility standard, and any underway remediation efforts addressing conformance issues.

(c) Respondents to this solicitation must identify any exception to Section 508 requirements. If an offeror claims its supplies or services meet applicable Section 508 accessibility standards, and it is later determined by the Government, *i.e.,* after award of a contract or order, that supplies or services delivered do not conform to the described accessibility standards, remediation of the supplies or services to the level of conformance specified in the contract will be the responsibility of the Contractor at its expense.

(End of provision)

[87 FR 61159, Oct. 7, 2022, as amended at 88 FR 88262, Dec. 21, 2023]
Exhibit 32.1


Certification of Principal Executive Officer


Pursuant to U.S.C. Section 1350


As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Digital Turbine, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:


The Annual Report on Form 10-K/A Amendment No. 1 for the period ending March 31, 2016 of the Company (the “Form 10-K/A”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Form 10-K/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: July 29, 2016By:/s/William StoneWilliam StoneChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
|Exhibit 32


Certification of
Chief Executive Officerand Chief Financial OfficerSecurities Exchange Act rules 13(a) and 15(d)
As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


In connection with the Quarterly
Report on Form 10-QSB of Metwood, Inc. (the Company) for the three months
ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company certifies, to the best knowledge and belief of the
signatory, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
               Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
               respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|Date: February 16, 2004 | /s/  Robert M. CallahanRobert M. CallahanChief Executive Officer
|----------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------

|Date: February 16, 2004 | /s/  Annette G. MarianoAnnette G. MarianoChief Financial Officer
|----------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------

|23
|--