50504 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 162 / Tuesday, August 21, 2012 / Notices 

6The definition of yard truck is at section 2025 

and two-engine sweeper is defined at 2025(d)(58). 

auxiliary engine used to power the 

broom or vacuum functions on twoengine sweepers.6

As stated above, EPA is offering the 

opportunity for a public hearing, and 

requesting written comments on issues 

relevant to a full waiver analysis. 

Specifically, please provide comment 

on: (a) Whether CARB’s determination 

that its standards, in the aggregate, are 

at least as protective of public health 

and welfare as applicable federal 

standards is arbitrary and capricious, (b) 

California needs separate standards to 

meet compelling and extraordinary 

conditions, and (c) California’s 

standards and accompanying 

enforcement procedures are consistent 

with section 209 of the Act. 

II. Procedures for Public Participation 

If a hearing is held, the Agency will 

make a verbatim record of the 

proceedings. Interested parties may 

arrange with the reporter at the hearing 

to obtain a copy of the transcript at their 

own expense. Regardless of whether a 

public hearing is held, EPA will keep 

the record open until October 22, 2012. 

Upon expiration of the comment period, 

the Administrator will render a decision 

on CARB’s request based on the record 

of the public hearing, if any, relevant 

written submissions, and other 

information that he deems pertinent. 

Persons with comments containing 

proprietary information must 

distinguish such information from other 

comments to the great possible extent 

and label it as ‘‘Confidential Business 

Information’’ (CBI). If a person making 

comments want EPA to base its decision 

in part on a submission labeled CBI, 

then a non-confidential version of the 

document that summarizes the key data 

or information should be submitted for 

the public docket. To ensure that 

proprietary information in not 

inadvertently place in the docket, 

submissions containing such 

information should be sent directly to 

the contact person listed above and not 

to the pubic docket. Information 

covered by a claim of confidentiality 

will be disclosed by EPA only to the 

extent allowed and by the procedures 

set forth in 40 CFR Part 2. If no claim 

of confidentiality accompanies the 

submission when EPA receives it, EPA 

will make it available to the public 

without further notice to the person 

making comments. 

Dated: August 9, 2012. 

Margo Tsirigotis Oge, 

Director, Office of Transportation and Air 

Quality, Office of Air and Radiation. 

[FR Doc. 2012–20499 Filed 8–20–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

[Regional Docket Nos. V–2011–1, FRL9717– 

8] 

Clean Air Act Operating Permit 

Program; Action on Petition for 

Objection to State Operating Permit for 

Georgia-Pacific Consumer Products 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Notice of final Order on petition 

to object to Clean Air Act (Act) Title V 

operating permit. 

SUMMARY: This document announces 

that the EPA Administrator has denied 

a petition from the Sierra Club, the 

Clean Water Action Council and the 

Midwest Environmental Defense Center 

asking EPA to object to a Title V 

operating permit issued by the 

Wisconsin Department of Natural 

Resources (WDNR) to Georgia-Pacific 

Consumer Products (Georgia-Pacific). 

Sections 307(b) and 505(b)(2) of the 

Act provide that a petitioner may ask for 

judicial review of those portions of the 

petition which EPA denies in the 

United States Court of Appeals for the 

appropriate circuit. Any petition for 

review shall be filed within 60 days 

from the date this notice appears in the 

Federal Register, pursuant to section 

307 of the Act. 

ADDRESSES: You may review copies of 

the final Order, the petition, and other 

supporting information at the EPA 

Region 5 Office, 77 West Jackson 

Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604. If 

you wish to examine these documents, 

you should make an appointment at 

least 24 hours before visiting day. 

Additionally, the final Order for the 

Georgia-Pacific petition is available 

electronically at: http://www.epa.gov/ 

region7/air/title5/petitiondb/ 

petitiondb.htm. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Genevieve Damico, Chief, Air Permits 

Section, Air Programs Branch, Air and 

Radiation Division, EPA, Region 5, 77 

West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, 

Illinois 60604, telephone (312) 353– 

4761. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Act 

affords EPA a 45-day period to review 

and object, as appropriate, to Title V 

operating permits proposed by state 

permitting authorities. Section 505(b)(2) 

of the Act authorizes any person to 

petition the EPA Administrator within 

60 days after the expiration of the EPA 

review period to object to a Title V 

operating permit if EPA has not done so. 

A petition must be based only on 

objections to the permit that were raised 

with reasonable specificity during the 

public comment period provided by the 

state, unless the petitioner demonstrates 

that it was impracticable to raise issues 

during the comment period, or the 

grounds for the issues arose after this 

period. 

On July 23, 2011, EPA received a 

petition from the Sierra Club, the Clean 

Water Action Council and the Midwest 

Environmental Defense Center 

(Petitioners) requesting that EPA object 

to the Title V operating permit for 

Georgia-Pacific. The Petitioners alleged 

that the permit is not in compliance 

with the requirements of the Act. 

Specifically, the Petitioners alleged that: 

(1) The permit lacks applicable 

prevention of significant deterioration 

(PSD) requirements because WDNR 

erroneously exempted as ‘‘routine 

maintenance, repair, and replacement’’ 

projects that resulted in a significant net 

emissions increase based on the 

applicable ‘‘actual to potential’’ 

emissions test; (2) the permit lacks 

applicable PSD and new source 

performance standard requirements that 

were triggered through non-exempt fuel 

switching and WDNR improperly 

deferred addressing this issue; and, (3) 

the permit lacks applicable 

requirements ensuring protection of air 

quality increments which apply 

pursuant to the Wisconsin state 

implementation plan and the PSD 

programs. 

On July 23, 2012, the Administrator 

issued an Order denying the petition. 

The Order explains the reasons behind 

EPA’s conclusion. 

Dated: July 27, 2012. 

Susan Hedman, 

Regional Administrator, Region 5. 

[FR Doc. 2012–20519 Filed 8–20–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

[FRL–9719–3] 

Good Neighbor Environmental Board 

Notification of Public Advisory 

Committee Teleconference 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Notification of Public Advisory 

Committee Teleconference. 


pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES