alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 651.39 Significance. ( a ) If the proposed action may or will result in significant impacts to the environment, an EIS is prepared to provide more comprehensive analyses and conclusions about the impacts. Significant impacts of socioeconomic consequence alone do not merit an EIS.
( b ) Significance of impacts is determined by examining both the context and intensity of the proposed action (40 CFR 1508.27). The analysis should establish, by resource category, the threshold at which significance is reached. For example, an action that would violate existing pollution standards; cause water, air, noise, soil, or underground pollution; impair visibility for substantial periods; or cause irreparable harm to animal or plant life could be determined significant. Significant beneficial effects also occur and must be addressed, if applicable.
( c ) The proponent should use appropriate methods to identify and ascertain the “significance” of impacts. The use of simple analytical tools, which are subject to independent peer review, fully documented, and available to the public, is encouraged.[4] In particular, where impacts are unknown or are suspected to be of public interest, public involvement should be initiated early in the EA (scoping) process.
Footnotes -
651.39
[4] EIFS is one such Army system for evaluating regional economic impacts under NEPA. This system is mandated, as Army policy, for use in NEPA analyses. Other similar tools may be mandated for use in the Army, and will be documented in guidance published pursuant to this part.
<PAGE>   1


                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2



                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the inclusion in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of National
Transaction Network, Inc. of our report dated February 12, 1999, included in the
1998 Annual Report to Stockholders of National Transaction Network, Inc.

Our audit also included the 1998 information in the financial statement schedule
of National Transaction Network, Inc. listed in Item 14(a). This schedule is the
responsibility of National Transaction Network, Inc.'s management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion based on our audit. In our opinion, the
financial statement schedule referred to above, when considered in relation to
the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material
respects the 1998 information set forth therein.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
33-66732 and 333-35893 on Form S-8 of National Transaction Network, Inc. of our
report dated February 12, 1999, with respect to the financial statements and
schedules of National Transaction Network, Inc. included in this Annual Report
(Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1998.

                                                      ERNST & YOUNG LLP


Atlanta, Georgia
March 30, 1999
#### STATE v. McHONE

No. 148A91-2

Case below: Surry County Superior Court

Motion by Attorney General to vacate certiorari review for defendant’s failure to timely file brief denied 4 September 1997.
MEMORANDUM 

TO : Deputy Commissioner of the Rehabilitation Services Administration

FROM : Michael Yudin, Acting Assistant Secretary 

SUBJECT: Delegation of Authority to Request Closure/Certification of Internal Audit Reports 

I. DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY 

In accordance with the policy and procedures set forth in the Department’s Handbook for the Post 

Audit Process and my responsibilities as Action Official for the Office of Special Education and 

Rehabilitative Services under the Department’s ACS Directive OCFO-01, I hereby delegate to 

you the authority to serve as the Action Official in issuing the Request for Closure/Certification 

Memorandum. This delegation of authority covers internal audits defined in this context as EDOIG and GAO issued audits as well as alternative products issued by ED0-OIG, and tracked by 

the Department’s automated tracking system. 

Unless otherwise noted in future delegations of authority, amendments to the authority cited 

herein are included within the scope of this delegation. 

II. RESERVATIONS 

None. 

III. REDELEGATION 

This authority may not be redelegated. 

IV. CERTIFICATION AND EFFECTIVE DATE 

This delegation is effective upon certification by the Department’s Delegation Control Officer.

 _________S_________ 

 Michael Yudin, 

 Acting Assistant Secretary 

Date Certified: February 19, 2015 

Departmental Delegations Control Officer: Jim Clemmens 

Control Number: EH/EHR/100
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1290 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1290

 Recognizing June 12, 2024, as this year's observance of ``Philippines 
 Independence Day'' to honor the 126th anniversary of the independence 
                          of the Philippines.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 11, 2024

 Mr. Moylan (for himself, Mr. Scott of Virginia, Mr. Bacon, Mr. Case, 
     Mr. Vargas, Mr. Sablan, and Mr. Issa) submitted the following 
   resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Recognizing June 12, 2024, as this year's observance of ``Philippines 
 Independence Day'' to honor the 126th anniversary of the independence 
                          of the Philippines.

Whereas Congress commends the people of the Philippines for enduring through 
        struggle and hardship;
Whereas Congress supports increased public awareness of the events surrounding 
        the Philippine Declaration of Independence, and the vibrant and 
        beautiful culture of the Philippines; and
Whereas Congress supports the continuing development of the Filipino American 
        community as an integral part of America's cultural fabric: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) recognizes the historic significance of the 126th 
        anniversary of the sovereign and independent country of the 
        Philippines on June 12, 1898;
            (2) reaffirms the bonds of friendship and cooperation which 
        have existed between the United States and the Philippines and 
        commits to strengthening those bonds;
            (3) reaffirms its support for the Philippines to defend its 
        internal security from terrorism;
            (4) reaffirms its enduring support for the Philippines;
            (5) recognizes the courage and bravery of the Filipino and 
        Filipino American servicemen and servicewomen who have fought 
        alongside and in the United States Armed Forces; and
            (6) supports the recognition of ``Philippines Independence 
        Day''.
                                 <all>
```
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-11-00192-CV

IN RE JEFFREY K. BROOKS RELATOR

------------

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

------------

Relator Jeffrey K. Brooks seeks a writ of mandamus to compel a district 

clerk to transmit copies of his two applications for writ of habeas corpus, any 

answers, the convicting court’s findings, and any related filings to the Texas 

Court of Criminal Appeals in accordance with article 11.07 of the Texas Code of 

Criminal Procedure. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 11.07, ' 3(c) (West 

Supp. 2010). An appellate court has no authority to issue a writ of mandamus 

against a district clerk unless the clerk is interfering with the court’s jurisdiction. 

See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. ' 22.221 (West 2004) (providing that court of appeals 

may only issue writ of mandamus against district and county judges or as 

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4, 52.8(d).
2

necessary to enforce jurisdiction of appellate court); In re Washington, 7 S.W.3d 

181, 182 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1999, orig. proceeding). An appellate 

court does not have jurisdiction over matters related to article 11.07 applications 

for writs of habeas corpus. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 11.07, '' 3, 5; In 

re McAfee, 53 S.W.3d 715, 718 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2001, orig. 

proceeding) (“Article 11.07 contains no role for the courts of appeals; the only 

courts referred to are the convicting court and the Court of Criminal Appeals.”). 

Thus, relator does not raise a complaint that the district clerk is interfering with 

this court’s jurisdiction, and we dismiss relator’s petition for writ of mandamus for 

want of jurisdiction. 

PER CURIAM

PANEL: GARDNER, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and DAUPHINOT, J.

DELIVERED: June 15, 2011
### SUBCHAPTER XIII—EMERGENCY COMMUNICATIONS

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

This subchapter is comprised of title XVIII of Pub. L. 107–296, as added by Pub. L. 109–295, title VI, §671(b), Oct. 4, 2006, 120 Stat. 1433. Another title XVIII of Pub. L. 107–296 was renumbered title XIX and is classified to subchapter XIV (§591 et seq.) of this chapter.
EXHIBIT 23.1



            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMS



We consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated April 16, 2004,
except with respect to the matters discussed in Note 28, the Basic and Diluted
Earnings per Share information of Note 30 D. and Note 30 E. to Note 30 L. as to
which the date is June 18, 2004, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements of Veolia Environnement and subsidiaries included in Veolia
Environnement Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2003,
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 28, 2004, in the
Registration Statement on Form S-8 pertaining to the Veolia Environnement Stock
Option Plan.



                          Paris and La Defense, France
                                  April 5, 2005

   Barbier Frinault & Cie                               RSM Salustro Reydel
       Ernst & Young



Jean Bouquot    Patrick Gounelle
#### TRIPP v. SEABOARD AIR LINE RY.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

February 10, 1905.)

Action by Alicia C. Tripp against the Seaboard Air Line Railway. No opinion. Motion denied, with $10 costs.
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-15-00215-CV

Rodolfo Rodriguez

v.

RG Options LLC

On Appeal from the

County Court at Law No 4 of Hidalgo County, Texas

Trial Cause No. CL-14-0133-D(2)

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the appeal should be DISMISSED. The Court orders the appeal 

DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion. Costs of the appeal are adjudged against 

appellant.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

October 8, 2015
### §2219a. Overtime and holiday pay

#### (a) In general

The Secretary of Agriculture may—

(1) pay employees of the Department of Agriculture employed in an establishment subject to the Federal Meat Inspection Act (21 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) or the Poultry Products Inspection Act (21 U.S.C. 451 et seq.) for all overtime and holiday work performed at the establishment at rates determined by the Secretary, subject to applicable law relating to minimum wages and maximum hours; and

(2) accept from the establishment reimbursement for any sums paid by the Secretary for the overtime and holiday work, at rates determined under paragraph (1).

#### (b) Availability

Sums received by the Secretary under this section shall remain available until expended without further appropriation and without fiscal year limitation, to carry out subsection (a).

(Pub. L. 107–171, title X, §10703(a), (b), May 13, 2002, 116 Stat. 517.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Federal Meat Inspection Act, referred to in subsec. (a)(1), is titles I to V of act Mar. 4, 1907, ch. 2907, as added Pub. L. 90–201, Dec. 15, 1967, 81 Stat. 584, and Pub. L. 110–246, title XI, §11015(a), June 18, 2008, 122 Stat. 2124, which are classified generally to subchapters I to IV–A (§601 et seq.) of chapter 12 of Title 21, Food and Drugs. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 601 of Title 21 and Tables.

The Poultry Products Inspection Act, referred to in subsec. (a)(1), is Pub. L. 85–172, Aug. 28, 1957, 71 Stat. 441, which is classified generally to chapter 10 (§451 et seq.) of Title 21, Food and Drugs. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 451 of Title 21 and Tables.
§ 935.95 Proceedings; record; judgment. ( a ) The presiding Judge is responsible for the making of an appropriate record of each civil action.
( b ) All persons shall give their testimony under oath or affirmation. The Chief Judge shall prescribe the oath and affirmation that may be administered by any Judge or the Clerk of the Court.
( c ) Each party may present witnesses and other forms of evidence. In addition, the presiding Judge may informally investigate any controversy, in or out of the Court, if the evidence obtained as a result is adequately disclosed to all parties. Witnesses, books, papers, documents, or other objects may be subpoenaed as provided for in § 935.80 for criminal cases.
( d ) The Court may issue its judgment in writing or orally from the bench. However, if an appeal is taken from the judgment, the presiding Judge shall, within 10 days after it is filed, file a memorandum of decision as a part of the record. The Judge shall place in the memorandum findings of fact, conclusions of law, and any comments that he considers will be helpful to a thorough understanding and just determination of the case on appeal.
### §1510. Deposit and investment of funds; Federal Reserve banks as fiscal agents

All money of the Corporation not otherwise employed may be deposited with the Treasurer of the United States or in any bank approved by the Secretary of the Treasury, subject to withdrawal by the Corporation at any time, or with the approval of the Secretary of the Treasury may be invested in obligations of the United States or in obligations guaranteed as to principal and interest by the United States. Subject to the approval of the Secretary of the Treasury, the Federal Reserve banks are hereby authorized and directed to act as depositories, custodians, and fiscal agents for the Corporation in the performance of its powers conferred by this subchapter.

(Feb. 16, 1938, ch. 30, title V, §510, 52 Stat. 75; Pub. L. 110–234, title XII, §12033(c)(2)(B), May 22, 2008, 122 Stat. 1405; Pub. L. 110–246, §4(a), title XII, §12033(c)(2)(B), June 18, 2008, 122 Stat. 1664, 2167.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Pub. L. 110–234 and Pub. L. 110–246 made identical amendments to this section. The amendments by Pub. L. 110–234 were repealed by section 4(a) of Pub. L. 110–246.

#### Amendments

2008—Pub. L. 110–246, §12033(c)(2)(B), substituted "this subchapter" for "this chapter".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2008 Amendment

Amendment of this section and repeal of Pub. L. 110–234 by Pub. L. 110–246 effective May 22, 2008, the date of enactment of Pub. L. 110–234, see section 4 of Pub. L. 110–246, set out as an Effective Date note under section 8701 of this title.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

Administration of program of Federal Crop Insurance Corporation transferred to Secretary of Agriculture by 1946 Reorg. Plan No. 3, §501, eff. July 16, 1946, 11 F.R. 7877, 60 Stat. 1100. See note set out under section 1503 of this title.

Wartime consolidation of Federal Crop Insurance Corporation into Agricultural Conservation and Adjustment Administration, see note set out under section 1503 of this title.
AVA 


NCDENR 


North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources 

Beverly Eaves Perdue, Govemor 	 Dee Freeman, Secretary 

November 9, 2010 

Gwendolyn Keyes Fleming 


Regional Administrator 


U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 


Region 4 


61 Forsyth Street, SW 


Atlanta, GA 30303-3104 


SUBJECT: 	 CTS ofAsheville, Inc.; NPL Listing 


Skyland, Buncombe County, NC 28776 


NCD 003 149556 


Dear Ms. Fleming, 

I am writing in response to your request for the state ofNorth Carolina's position 

regarding the proposed listing ofthe CTS of Asheville, Inc. site on the National Priorities List 

(NPL). 

The State of North Carolina supports the Environmental Protection Agency's efforts to 

propose this site for inclusion on the NPL. 

North Carolina appreciates the EPA's continued assistance to protect the state's public 

health and the environment. If you have any questions or require further assistance, please do 

not hesitate to contact Dexter Matthews, Director, Division of Waste Management at (919) 508­

8414. 

Sincerely, 

?~D(2e::fr~eR~ cc: 	 Dexter Matthews, NC DWM 


Jack Butler, NC DWM 


Jim Bateson, NC DWM 


ranklin Hi.lL US EPA Region 4 . 


Jennifer Wendel, US EPA Region 4 


1601 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1601 N~rthCarolina 

Phone: 919-733-4984 \ FAX: 919-715-3060 \ Internet: www,enr,state.nc.us/ENR/ )Vatllrallll An Eaual Opportunity I Affinnative Action Emolover - 50 % Recvcled \ 10 % Post Consumer Paper
### §1511. Tax exemption

The Corporation, including its franchise, its capital, reserves, and surplus, and its income and property, shall be exempt from all taxation on or after February 16, 1938, imposed by the United States or by any Territory, dependency, or possession thereof, or by any State, county, municipality, or local taxing authority. A contract of insurance of the Corporation, and a contract of insurance reinsured by the Corporation, shall be exempt from taxation imposed by any State, municipality, or local taxing authority.

(Feb. 16, 1938, ch. 30, title V, §511, 52 Stat. 75; Pub. L. 103–354, title I, §108, Oct. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 3197.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1994—Pub. L. 103–354 inserted at end "A contract of insurance of the Corporation, and a contract of insurance reinsured by the Corporation, shall be exempt from taxation imposed by any State, municipality, or local taxing authority."

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1994 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 103–354 effective Oct. 13, 1994, and applicable to provision of crop insurance under Federal Crop Insurance Act (7 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.) beginning with 1995 crop year, with such Act, as in effect on the day before Oct. 13, 1994, to continue to apply with respect to 1994 crop year, see section 120 of Pub. L. 103–354, set out as a note under section 1502 of this title.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

Administration of program of Federal Crop Insurance Corporation transferred to Secretary of Agriculture by 1946 Reorg. Plan No. 3, §501, eff. July 16, 1946, 11 F.R. 7877, 60 Stat. 1100. See note set out under section 1503 of this title.

Wartime consolidation of Federal Crop Insurance Corporation into Agricultural Conservation and Adjustment Administration, see note set out under section 1503 of this title.
AD Economic Evaluation

Docket No . FAA

- 20 15

- 3929 Directorate ID : 2015

- SW

- 031

- AD

Helicopter Model: Airbus Helicopters Model EC130B4, EC130T2, AS350B, AS350B1, AS350B2, AS350B3, AS350BA, AS350C, AS350D, AS350D1, AS3 55E, AS355F, AS355F1, AS355F2, AS355N, and AS355NP helicopters.

Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 1,132 Helicopters in the US Registry.

Reason : The proposed actions are intended to detect cracks in a cross

- bar and prevent failure of
the cross

- bar an d subsequent loss of control of the helicopter.

Costs :

• Visually inspecting the cross

- bar would require 16.5 work

- hours for a labor

cost of about $1,403. No parts would be needed so that the cost for the U.S. fleet would

total $1,588,196 per inspection cy cle.

• Replacing the cross

- bar would cost $1,630 for parts. No additional labor

costs would be needed.

Executive Order 12866 : Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No (  )

DOT Regulatory Policies and Pro cedures : Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No (  )

Regulatory Flexibility Act : Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Yes ( ) No (  )

Project Engineer : Robert Grant
§ 811.6 Visual information product/material loans. ( a ) You may request unclassified and classified copies of current Air Force productions and loans of DoD and other Federal productions from JVISDA, ATTN: ASQV-JVIA-T-AS, Bldg. 3, Bay 3, 11 Hap Arnold Blvd., Tobyhanna, PA 18466-5102. ( 1 ) For unclassified products, use your organization's letterhead, identify subject title, PIN, format, and quantity.
( 2 ) For classified products, use your organization's letterhead, identify subject title, personal identification number (PIN), format, and quantity. Also, indicate that either your organization commander or security officer, and MAJCOM VI manager approve the need.
( b ) You may request other VI materials, such as, still images and motion media stock footage, from DVIC/OM-PA, 1363 Z Street, Building 2730, March ARB, CA 92518-2703.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.

SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Fred C. Schulte, Chief Executive Officer of Elgin National Industries,
Inc., certify that:



| | 1. | This quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Elgin National Industries, Inc. fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in this quarterly report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Elgin National Industries, Inc.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/    FRED C. SCHULTEFred C. SchulteChief Executive Officer




Date: August 13, 2004
### §662. Clearances

The Secretary shall make available the process of application for security clearances under Executive Order 13549 (75 Fed. Reg. 162; 1 relating to a classified national security information program) or any successor Executive Order to appropriate representatives of sector coordinating councils, sector Information Sharing and Analysis Organizations, owners and operators of critical infrastructure, and any other person that the Secretary determines appropriate.

(Pub. L. 107–296, title XXII, §2212, formerly title II, §229, formerly §228, as added Pub. L. 113–282, §7(a), Dec. 18, 2014, 128 Stat. 3070; renumbered §229, Pub. L. 114–113, div. N, title II, §223(a)(1), Dec. 18, 2015, 129 Stat. 2963; renumbered title XXII, §2212, and amended Pub. L. 115–278, §2(g)(2)(I), (9)(A)(vi), Nov. 16, 2018, 132 Stat. 4178, 4181; Pub. L. 117–263, div. G, title LXXI, §7143(b)(2)(G), Dec. 23, 2022, 136 Stat. 3660.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Executive Order 13549, referred to in text, is Ex. Ord. No. 13549, Aug. 18, 2010, 75 F.R. 51609, which is set out as a note under section 3161 of Title 50, War and National Defense.

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 150 of this title prior to renumbering by Pub. L. 115–278.

#### Amendments

2022—Pub. L. 117–263 substituted "Information Sharing and Analysis Organizations" for "information sharing and analysis organizations (as defined in section 671(5) of this title)".

2018—Pub. L. 115–278, §2(g)(9)(A)(vi), substituted "section 671(5) of this title" for "section 131(5) of this title".

1 So in original. Probably should be "51609;".