alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 536.155 Claims payable involving tortfeasors other than nonappropriated fund employees. ( a ) Non-NAFI RIMP claims can arise from the activities of: ( 1 ) Members of NAFIs or authorized users of NAFI sports equipment or devices for recreational purposes, while using such property, except real property, in the manner and for the purposes authorized by DA regulations and the charter, constitution, and bylaws of the particular NAF activity.
( 2 ) Family child care providers, authorized members of the provider's household and approved substitute providers while care under the family child care program is being provided in the manner prescribed in AR 608-10, except as excluded below. Such claims are generally limited to injuries to, or death of, children receiving care under the family child care program that are caused by the negligence of authorized providers. Claims arising from the transportation of such children in motor vehicles and claims involving loss of or damage to property are not cognizable.
( b ) An ACO or a CPO will ask the Commander USARCS for an advisory opinion prior to settling any non-NAFI RIMP claim where the person whose conduct generated liability does not fall clearly within the categories listed above. Such authorities may also ask, through the Commander USARCS, for an advisory opinion from the U.S. Army Community and Family Support Center prior to settling any claim arising under paragraph (a)(2) of this section, where it is not clear that the injured or deceased child was receiving care within the scope of the family child care program.
( c ) Where liability has been determined to exist for both non-NAFI RIMP and APF activities, liability will be apportioned between the two activities.
( d ) The total payment for all claims (including derivative claims), arising as a result of injury to, or death of, any one person is limited to $500,000 for each incident. Continuous or repeated exposure to substantially the same or similar harmful activity or conditions is treated as one incident for purposes of determining the limits of liability.
For Real Estate Managers

The U.S. Department of Energy’s Building Energy Asset Score is a national 

standardized tool for evaluating the 

physical and structural energy efficiency of commercial and multifamily 

residential buildings. The Asset Score 

generates a simple energy efficiency 

rating that enables comparison among 

buildings, and identifies opportunities 

for users to invest in energy efficiency 

upgrades. It is web-based and free to 

use.

Overview

While the tenants and energy 

usage patterns within a building 

frequently change, its physical 

structure and major systems and 

equipment remain mostly constant. These underlying energy 

“assets” – such as the building 

envelope, windows, and major 

energy-related systems – have a 

significant impact on how efficiently energy is used regardless 

of how the building operates or the 

behavior of occupants.

The Asset Score assesses the 

energy efficiency of these assets 

and identifies opportunities for 

improvement. Using building 

information input by the user, the 

tool runs a building energy simulation and generates a report that includes the following information: 

• A 10-point score based on the 

energy efficiency of the building 

envelope and the mechanical, 

electrical, and service hot water 

systems.

• An energy efficiency assessment 

of the building’s individual 

systems.

• Estimated energy usage for the 

building and end uses under 

standard operating conditions.

• Opportunities to upgrade building efficiency, and a “potential” 

energy efficiency score based on 

identified upgrades.

The Asset Score can be used for 

new construction projects and 

existing buildings with commercial or multifamily residential 

use types, including office, retail, 

warehouse, education, lodging, police and fire stations, and 

residential apartments. For a full 

listing of use types and more 

information on the Asset Score, 

please visit: http://energy.gov/eere/

buildings/building-energy-assetscore. 

The Asset Score uses a 10-point scale to evaluate the energy efficiency of a building’s 

physical characteristics and major energy-related systems.

Value for Real Estate 

Managers

Use of the Asset Score is expanding 

nationwide in the public and private 

sectors. Real estate managers can use 

the Asset Score to:

•	 Strengthen your sustainability 

service offerings for building 

ownership clients

•	 Provide added value to clients by 

understanding their asset portfolios 

and opportunities for energy 

efficiency improvement

•	 Support building owners in 

communicating their sustainability 

leadership to the marketplace

•	 Demonstrate national sustainability 

leadership and corporate social 

responsibility

Contact us at 

asset.score@ee.doe.gov

BUILDING ENERGY ASSET SCORE

For more information, visit: buildings.energy.gov

DOE/EE-1177 • January 2015

BUILDING TECHNOLOGIES OFFICE
#### § 750.42 Statutory authority.

10 U.S.C. 2733, as amended, commonly referred to as the Military Claims Act (MCA).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>       5
<MULTIPLIER>    1,000

<S>                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                           MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                 15,425
<SECURITIES>                           15,912
<RECEIVABLES>                          36,974
<ALLOWANCES>                           0
<INVENTORY>                            12,373
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                       86,027
<PP&E>                                 37,977
<DEPRECIATION>                        (27,867)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        123,067
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                  40,927
<BONDS>                                33,267
<COMMON>                               8,454
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                  0
<PREFERRED>                            57
<OTHER-SE>                             33,964
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>          123,067
<SALES>                                29,002
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                       29,002
<CGS>                                  21,858
<TOTAL-COSTS>                          25,912
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                     628
<INCOME-PRETAX>                        3,045
<INCOME-TAX>                           915
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                    2,130
<DISCONTINUED>                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                        0
<CHANGES>                              0
<NET-INCOME>                           2,130
<EPS-BASIC>                          .28
<EPS-DILUTED>                          .24


</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of Daniel J. Spooner, an Attorney, Respondent. Departmental Disciplinary Committee for the First Judicial Department, Petitioner.

First Department,

February 27, 1979

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Michael A. Schwartz*for petitioner.

*John G. Bonomi*for respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

*Per Curiam.*

Respondent was admitted to the Bar on December 17, 1934 in the First Judicial Department.

On February 27, 1978, he was found guilty of two counts of embezzlement from a credit union in violation of section 657 of title 18 of the United States Code. On July 14, 1978, the sentence for this crime was suspended, and respondent was placed on probation for two years.

The Federal felony for which respondent was convicted is *496substantially similar to the New York felony described in sections 155.05 (subds 1, 2, par [a]) and 155.35 of the Penal Law.

Accordingly, pursuant to subdivision 4 of section 90 of the Judiciary Law, respondent upon such conviction ceased to be an attorney and counselor at law in the State of New York. *(Matter of Mitchell,*40 NY2d 153.)

The questions which arise under the decisions in *Matter of Chu*(42 NY2d 490) and *Matter of Thies*(45 NY2d 865) do not here apply. Respondent’s name should be stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors at law.

Kupferman, J. P., Evans, Fein, Markewich and Sandler, JJ., concur.

Respondent’s name stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors at law in the State of New York.
§ 536.150 Claims payable from appropriated funds. Claims payable from appropriated funds will be processed under the appropriate subpart. Appropriated fund payable claims include those resulting from: ( a ) Acts or omissions of military personnel while performing assigned military duties in connection with NAFI activities.
( b ) Acts or omissions of civilian employees paid from appropriated funds in connection with NAFI activities.
( c ) Negligent maintenance of an appropriated funds facility used by a NAFI activity but for which the Department of Defense or Department of the Army (DA) command concerned is responsible and has been notified of the deficiency by the NAF. Where liability is determined to exist for both a NAFI and an appropriated fund activity, liability will be apportioned between the two activities.
( d ) Temporary use of a NAFI facility by an appropriated fund activity.
( e ) Operation of government owned or rented vehicles on authorized missions for NAFI activities where the driver is a DA soldier or civilian employee and is paid from APFs.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Section 1350 Certificationof the**

**Chief Executive Officer**

 

I,James R. Bazet, the chief executive officer of Cobra Electronics Corporation,certify that (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of CobraElectronics Corporation for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010 (the“Form 10-Q”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the informationcontained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of Cobra Electronics Corporationand its subsidiaries.

 

 
|   | /s/  James R. Bazet |
|--------|---------------------|
|   | James  R. Bazet     |
|   | May 14,  2010  |

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 6 (Monday, January 11, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1976-1977]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-00282]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended, and the Determination of the Director, Strategic 
Business Initiatives Unit, Office of the Chief Operating Officer, CDC, 
pursuant to Public Law 92-463. The grant applications and the 
discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial 
property such as patentable material, and personal information 
concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the 
disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of 
personal privacy.
    Name of Committee: Disease, Disability, and Injury Prevention and 
Control Special Emphasis Panel (SEP)--RFA-IP-21-003, Collaborative 
Research on Influenza, Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), and Other 
Respiratory Pathogens in South Africa.
    Date: May 13, 2021.
    Time: 10:00 a.m.-5:00 p.m., EDT.

[[Page 1977]]

    Place: Teleconference, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 
Room 1080, 8 Corporate Square Boulevard, Atlanta, Georgia 30329-4027.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gregory Anderson, M.S., M.P.H., 
Scientific Review Officer, CDC, 1600 Clifton Road, NE, Mailstop US8-1, 
Atlanta, Georgia 30329-4027, (404) 718-8833, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#593e38373d3c2b2a3637193a3d3a773e362f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="096e68676d6c7b7a6667496a6d6a276e667f">[email protected]</span></a>.
    The Director, Strategic Business Initiatives Unit, Office of the 
Chief Operating Officer, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 
has been delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices 
pertaining to announcements of meetings and other committee management 
activities, for both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and 
the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.

Kalwant Smagh,
Director, Strategic Business Initiatives Unit, Office of the Chief 
Operating Officer, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2021-00282 Filed 1-8-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 99.2
    
 CERTIFICATE OF QUALIFICATION
  1.
    
    I am President of PGH, the engineering firm that prepared the above referenced report for
Fieldpoint Petroleum Corporation dated March 8, 2010.2.
    
    As President of PGH, I was responsible for the preparation of this report.3.
    
    I am a graduate of The University of Texas at Austin. I obtained a Bachelor of Science
degree in Petroleum Engineering in May 1980. I am a Licensed Professional Engineer in the
State of Texas. My license number is 56682. I am a member of the Society of Petroleum
Engineers, the Society of Petroleum Evaluation Engineers, the Society of Petrophysicists and
Well Log Analysts and the American Association of Petroleum Geologists. I have in excess of
29 years of experience as a petroleum engineer in the oil and gas industry performing
reservoir studies and oil and gas reserve evaluations.
 /s/ Wayman T. Gore, Jr.Wayman T. Gore, Jr., P.E.Texas Engineering License No. 56682
President
PGH Petroleum & Environmental Engineers, L.L.C.
#### § 989.23 Contractor prepared documents.

All Air Force EIAP documents belong to and are the responsibility of the Air Force. EIAP correspondence and documents distributed outside of the Air Force should generally be signed out by Air Force personnel and documents should reflect on the cover sheet they are an Air Force document. Contractor preparation information should be contained within the document's list of preparers.
Joseph Large

Large Joe Photo LLC

P.O. Box 6776

Breckenridge, CO 80424 

Phone: (215) 565 5317

Email: joe@josephlarge.com

Exemption: Section 333 

Extent & Reason: I am a professional photographer and filmmaker based in Breckenridge, CO.

(www.josephlarge.com) I have been operating since 2003 and I have become one of the most used

resource in Breckenridge and the surrounding areas. I have recently invested in several drones (DJI 

Inspire 1 & two DJI Phantom 2's) and would like to use the drone for aerial video and photography. Aerial

photography and video has become a vital part of marketing real estate as it shows homes and the 

environment in their entirety. 

Benefits: My use of drone video and photography would help the real estate agents and companies

market properties in the area. With our already booming real estate market in the Colorado mountains, 

the level of service I provide with the drones would take the appeal to a new level.

Reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety: I only fly the drones in the best possible

conditions (winds less than mph). I fly very low as most homes are not over 2 stories tall. Also, homes in

the mountains are usually very secluded and most people won't even me flying them.

Summary: Large Joe Photo LLC (Joseph Large) is seeking an exemption for Section 333 in order to fly a

drone (unmanned aircraft) commercially to help market real estate in Breckenridge, CO.
#### In the Matter of Philbern Realty Corp., Appellant, v. Robert E. Herman, as State Rent Administrator, Respondent.

Order entered on February 27, 1962 unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to respondent. No opinion. Concur — Rabin, J. P., Valente, Stevens, Eager and Steuer, JJ.
### §5107. Classification of positions

Except as otherwise provided by this chapter, each agency shall place each position under its jurisdiction in its appropriate class and grade in conformance with standards published by the Office of Personnel Management or, if no published standards apply directly, consistently with published standards. When facts warrant, an agency may change a position which it has placed in a class or grade under this section from that class or grade to another class or grade. Subject to subchapter VI of chapter 53 of this title, these actions of an agency are the basis for pay and personnel transactions until changed by certificate of the Office.

(Pub. L. 89–554, Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 453; Pub. L. 95–454, title VIII, §801(a)(3)(E), title IX, §906(a)(2), (3), Oct. 13, 1978, 92 Stat. 1222, 1224.)

| Derivation | U.S. Code | Revised Statutes and Statutes at Large |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | 5 U.S.C. 1102(a). | Oct. 28, 1949, ch. 782, §502(a), 63 Stat. 958. |

Statutes at Large

The words "to which this chapter applies" are omitted as unnecessary in view of section 5102. The words "Subject to section 5337 of this title" are added to reflect the qualification imposed by that section.

Standard changes are made to conform with the definitions applicable and the style of this title as outlined in the preface to the report.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1978—Pub. L. 95–454 substituted "Office of Personnel Management" for "Civil Service Commission", "Office" for "Commission", and "subchapter VI of chapter 53" for "section 5337".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1978 Amendment

Amendment by section 803(a)(3)(E) of Pub. L. 95–454, substituting reference to subchapter VI of chapter 53 for reference to section 5337, effective on first day of first applicable pay period beginning on or after 90th day after Oct. 13, 1978, see section 801(a)(4) of Pub. L. 95–454, set out as an Effective Date note under section 5361 of this title.

Amendment by section 906(a)(2), (3) of Pub. L. 95–454, substituting reference to Office of Personnel Management for reference to Civil Service Commission, effective 90 days after Oct. 13, 1978, see section 907 of Pub. L. 95–454, set out as a note under section 1101 of this title.
§ 196.205 Educational institutions and other entities controlled by religious organizations. ( a ) *Exemption.* These Title IX regulations do not apply to any operation of an educational institution or other entity that is controlled by a religious organization to the extent that application of these Title IX regulations would not be consistent with the religious tenets of such organization.
( b ) *Exemption claims.* An educational institution or other entity that wishes to claim the exemption set forth in paragraph (a) of this section shall do so by submitting in writing to the designated agency official a statement by the highest-ranking official of the institution, identifying the provisions of these Title IX regulations that conflict with a specific tenet of the religious organization.
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1561 

Condemning President Biden’s remarks referring to President Trump’s 

supporters as ‘‘garbage’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 1, 2024 

Mr. ROSE (for himself, Mr. SELF, Ms. HAGEMAN, Mr. BIGGS, Mr. SESSIONS, 

Mr. OGLES, Mr. BABIN, Mr. DUNCAN, Mr. DONALDS, Mr. MEUSER, and 

Mr. FLEISCHMANN) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Accountability 

RESOLUTION 

Condemning President Biden’s remarks referring to 

President Trump’s supporters as ‘‘garbage’’. 

Whereas, on October 29, 2024, President Biden stated, ‘‘The 

only garbage I see floating around there is his supporters’’, referring to supporters of President Trump: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives con2 demns President Biden’s remarks referring to President 

3 Trump’s supporters as ‘‘garbage’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
## Georgia Department of Natural Resources

Environmental Protection Division

2 Martin Luther King Jr., Dr., Suite 1152 Atlanta, Georgia 30334

Judson H. Turner, Director

(404)656

- 4713

December 9 , 201 5

Beverly Banister, Director

Air, Pesticides & Toxics Management Division

US EPA Region 4

61 Forsyth St ., SW

Atlanta, GA 30303

Dear M s

. Banister :

I have attached the 201 5 AMP Reports (AMP 600 a nd AMP450 NC ) for certification of the

201 5 Georgia ozone monitoring data through the 2015 Ozone Monitoring Season . The

ambient concentration data and the quality assurance data are submitted to AQS. The

ambient air data are accurate to the best of m y knowledge taking into consideration the

quality assurance findings.

If you should have any questions or comments, please let me know.

Sincerely,

DeAnna Oser

Program Manager

Ambient Monitoring Program

Cc: Darren Palmer, US EPA, Region IV

EPA Correspo ndence file
Program Partners Leverage Know-How 

and Market Pull 

Partners are key to the success of the L PrizeSM competition. 

Utilities and energy efficiency programs from coast to coast have 

joined the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) to promote superefficient, solid-state lighting products to replace today’s most 

common light bulbs. L Prize partners assist DOE in evaluating 

potential L Prize products through field assessments and provide 

ready-made markets for winning products. 

New technologies are almost always more expensive when first 

brought to market due to low volumes and high development 

costs. By joining together to represent significant demand, the 

U.S. government and L Prize partners drive sales volumes up and 

prices down far more quickly than would otherwise be possible. 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

L Prize Product Evaluation 

Products entering the L Prize competition are evaluated in a multistep process designed to provide a high 

level of confidence in their performance and energy efficiency. Photometric and electrical testing of 

proposed products is conducted by independent laboratories, such as those participating in the DOE 

CALiPER test program. 

Program partners play a critical role in the evaluation process by conducting field assessments of 

proposed products. Field assessments use criteria established by the DOE GATEWAY demonstration 

program and include: 

 Installation in host customer facilities, such as homes, commercial spaces, or outdoor locations. 

 Installation in utility technology demonstration facilities. 

 Focus group testing with retailers, builders, and/or consumers. 

L Prize field assessments: 

 Evaluate energy use of the products when installed in-situ. 

 Characterize the lighting system performance as compared to the
 

existing technology.
 

 Evaluate reliability and customer acceptance of the products during 

the test period.
 

 Evaluate criteria for cost-effective deployment through an energy 

efficiency program. 

Field assessment results provide valuable input for the ultimate selection of winners. 

L Prize Product Promotion 

Program partners play an important role in promoting and developing markets for the winning L Prize 

products. Up to three winners may be declared in each product category. A large amount of quantitative 

and qualitative data is available to support promotion of the winning products via: 

 Product incentives paid directly to manufacturers or to consumers. 

 Collaborative marketing and promotion. 

 Partnerships with local, regional, and/or national retailers. 

 Demonstrations and promotions with local homebuilders, commercial developers, hospitality 

chains, local governments, schools, universities, etc. 

Join Us 

For more information on becoming a program partner, contact lprize@pnl.gov. 

EERE Information Center 

1-877-EERE-INF (1-877-337-3463) 

www.eere.energy.gov 

For more information on L Prize, see www.lightingprize.org. 

Learn more about the DOE SSL CALiPER and GATEWAY 

programs at www.ssl.energy.gov. 

January 2010 |