alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
exv10w18



 







Exhibit 10.18




Form Of

AMENDMENT OF MANAGEMENT SERVICES AGREEMENT




     This AMENDMENT OF MANAGEMENT SERVICES AGREEMENT (the “Agreement”), is entered
into as of ___, 2006, by and between Crosman Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the
“Company”) and Kilgore Consulting III LLC, a Connecticut limited liability company
(“Kilgore”).



RECITALS:




     WHEREAS, the Company and Kilgore entered into that certain Management Services Agreement dated
February 10, 2004 (the “MSA”);



     WHEREAS, the Company and Kilgore desire to amend certain provisions of the MSA in accordance
with the terms of this Agreement;



     NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual premises and the respective mutual agreements
contained herein, the Company and Kilgore agree as follows:



     Section 1. Termination by Company. Paragraph 1 of the MSA is amended by adding the
following language to the end of Paragraph 1:




“Notwithstanding any provision of this Agreement to the contrary, the Company may
terminate this Agreement upon 30 days’ prior written notice to Kilgore.”



     Section 2. Assignment. Paragraph 9 of the MSA is amended by adding the following
language to the end of Paragraph 9:




“Notwithstanding any provision of this Paragraph 9 to the contrary, Kilgore may
assign this Agreement to Compass Group Management LLC and shall upon such assignment
provide written notice thereof to the Company within 10 calendar days of such
assignment.”



     Section 3. Offsetting Management Services Agreement. The MSA, as amended by this
Agreement, shall be an “Offsetting Management Services Agreement” as defined in that certain
Management Services Agreement dated of even date hereof, by and between Compass Group Diversified
Holdings LLC and Compass Group Management LLC.



     Section 4. Effectiveness of MSA. Except as otherwise provided in this Agreement, the
terms and provisions of the MSA remain in full force and effect.



     Section 5. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be construed under and shall be
governed by the laws of the State of Connecticut.



     Section 6. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts,
each of which will be deemed to be an original copy of this Agreement and all of which, when taken
together, will be deemed to constitute one and the same agreement.



{remainder of page left intentionally blank; signature page follows}




 









 








     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed and delivered this Amendment to
Management Services Agreement as of the date first above written.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	COMPANY: 



Crosman Corporation, 

a Delaware corporation

 	 
	 	 	By:  	 	 
	 	 	Name:  	 	 
	 	 	Title:  	 	 
	 
	 	KILGORE:



Kilgore Consulting III LLC, 

a Connecticut limited liability company



By: The Compass Group International LLC,
its Managing Manager

 	 
	 	 	By:  	 	 
	 	 	Name:  	 	 
	 	 	Title:
#### Joyce Berry *v.*Ronald N. Jones

*Francis A. Smith, Jr.,*for the appellee (defendant).

*Donald W. Bicknell,*for the appellant (plaintiff).

Argued January 7

decided January 7, 1975

The defendant’s motion to dismiss the appeal from the Superior Court in Fairfield County is denied.
### §2008f. Crop insurance requirement

#### (a) In general

As a condition of obtaining any benefit (including a direct loan, loan guarantee, or payment) described in subsection (b), a borrower must obtain at least catastrophic risk protection insurance coverage under section 1508 of this title for the crop and crop year for which the benefit is sought, if the coverage is offered by the Corporation.

#### (b) Applicable benefits

Subsection (a) shall apply to—

(1) a farm ownership loan (FO) under section 1923 of this title;

(2) an operating loan (OL) under section 1942 of this title; and

(3) an emergency loan (EM) under section 1961 of this title.

(Pub. L. 87–128, title III, §371, as added Pub. L. 103–354, title I, §119(b), Oct. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 3208.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Oct. 13, 1994, and applicable to provision of crop insurance under Federal Crop Insurance Act (7 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.) beginning with 1995 crop year, with such Act, as in effect on the day before Oct. 13, 1994, to continue to apply with respect to 1994 crop year, see section 120 of Pub. L. 103–354, set out as an Effective Date of 1994 Amendment note under section 1502 of this title.
Exhibit 99-1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Equity Oil Company (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Paul M. Dougan, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,to the best of my knowledge and belief that:



| |  | /s/PAUL M. DOUGAN                                              |  | 
| |  | -------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
| |  | Paul M. Dougan,President Chief Executive OfficerAugust 6, 2002 |  | 
| |  |                                                                |  | 

---

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Equity Oil Company (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Russell V. Florence, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,to the best of my knowledge and belief that:



| |  | /s/RUSSELL V. FLORENCE                                              |  | 
| |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
| |  | Russell V. Florence Treasurer
Chief Financial OfficerAugust 6, 2002 |  | 
| |  |                                                                     |  | 

---

QuickLinks
#### § 770.9 Miscellaneous.

Refer to the Annual Fishing and Hunting Bulletins that will cover any annual miscellaneous changes.

[65 FR 53592, Sept. 5, 2000]
### §5935. Repealed. Pub. L. 113–79, title VII, §7407, Feb. 7, 2014, 128 Stat. 898

Section, Pub. L. 104–127, title VIII, §892, Apr. 4, 1996, 110 Stat. 1183, related to use of remote sensing data and other data to anticipate potential food, feed, and fiber shortages or excesses and to provide timely information to assist farmers with planting decisions.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Remote Sensing for Agricultural and Resource Management

Pub. L. 106–391, title III, §316, Oct. 30, 2000, 114 Stat. 1596, directed the Administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration to determine data product types that are of use to farmers which can be remotely sensed from air or space; to consider certain useful commercial data products; to examine other data sources, which can provide domestic and international agricultural information; and to develop plan to inform farmers and other prospective users about use and availability of remote sensing products that may assist with agricultural and forestry applications.
No. 753.

#### Arthur Bain *v.*United States.

April 19, 1920.

*Mr. Abram M. Tillman*for petitioner.

*Mr. Assistant Attorney General Stewart*and *Mr. H. S. Ridgely*for the United States!

Petition for a writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
#### Jules Chopak, Appellant, v. Joseph Marcus, Defendant. Hayes Development Inc., Respondent.

In an action to recover money loaned and interest, in which the plaintiff recovered a judgment against the defendant Joseph Marcus in the Civil Court of the City of Flew York, and thereafter, as judgment creditor, issued and served a purported subpoena upon Hayes Development, Inc., calling for its examination as a- third party with respect to any property of the judgment debtor in its possession (cf. CPLR 5223, 5224), the plaintiff, pursuant to leave granted by this court, appeals from an order of the Appellate Term of the Supreme Court, dated April 27, 1964, which affirmed an order of the said Civil Court, entered FTovember 1, 1963, denying his motion to punish Hayes Development. Inc., for contempt by reason of *826its failure to obey said subpoena. Order of the Appellate Term affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. ‘The plaintiff, who is not an attorney and who appeared *in propria persona,*is not a person authorized to issue a subpoena without a court order (CPLR 2302, subd. [a]; cf. *Schwartz*v. *Shapiro,*91 N. Y. S. 2d 771). Ughetta, Acting P. J., Christ, Brennan, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
### §15a. Repealed. Pub. L. 95–405, §24, Sept. 30, 1978, 92 Stat. 877

Section, Pub. L. 93–463, title II, §217, Oct. 23, 1974, 88 Stat. 1405, related to leverage contracts for gold and silver. See section 23(b) of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Oct. 1, 1978, see section 28 of Pub. L. 95–405, set out as an Effective Date of 1978 Amendment note under section 2 of this title.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>

</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         457,857
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  825,597
<ALLOWANCES>                                   40,000
<INVENTORY>                                    754,919
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               2,048,855
<PP&E>                                         1,002,003
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (712,981)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2,638,768
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          893,688
<BONDS>                                        1,524,208
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       490,974
<OTHER-SE>                                     12,596,573
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2,638,768
<SALES>                                        5,318,371
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               5,318,371
<CGS>                                          3,039,907
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  2,689,930
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (37,297)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (448,763)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (448,763)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (448,763)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.14)
        


</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE: ATTORNEYS 

ADMINISTRATIVELY SUSPENDED

PURSUANT TO RULE 111(b), 

Pa.R.C.L.E. 

:

:

:

:

NO. 44 INC

 O R D E R

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 6

th day of August, 2014, it is hereby ORDERED that the 

attorneys named on the attached list are administratively suspended pursuant to Rule 

111(b), Pa.R.C.L.E.; and it is further ORDERED that the said suspension shall be 

effective thirty days after the date of this Order pursuant to Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.1

                   CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 USC SS.1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Composite Technology Corporation
(Company) on Form 10-KSB/A (Report) for the year ended September 30, 2002, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof. I, Benton
H Wilcoxon, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my
knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Benton H Wilcoxon
----------------------------
Benton H Wilcoxon
Chief Executive Officer

Dated: February 3, 2004

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In connection with the Annual Report of Composite Technology Corporation
(Company) on Form 10-KSB/A (Report) for the year ended September 30, 2002, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof. I, Benton
H Wilcoxon, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my
knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Benton H Wilcoxon
----------------------------
Benton H Wilcoxon
Chief Financial Officer

Dated: February 3, 2004
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Stephen F. Smith, Chief Financial Officer of EXCO
Resources, Inc., certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of EXCO Resources, Inc.; and
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |                                         
|------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------
|Date: March 3, 2010 |  | /s/ STEPHEN F. SMITH                    
|                    |  | Stephen F. Smith Chief
Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with
the Quarterly Report of Esterline Technologies Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended January 29, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Form 10-Q), I, Robert D. George, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)        The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)        The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                                         
|-------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ----------------------------------------
|Dated: March 4, 2010 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Robert D. George                    
|                     |  |  |  |     |  | Robert D. George                        
|                     |  |  |  |     |  | Vice President, Chief Financial Officer,
|                     |  |  |  |     |  | Secretary and Treasurer
3000’ **UA S Launch Ar** **ea #1** 

37.105199, - 122.2111113000’ **UA S Launch Ar** **ea #2**  37.109785, - 122.209566
<PAGE>   1
                                                                  EXHIBIT 10.D.1


                             AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO THE
                        1995 INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN

         Pursuant to Sections 3.2 and 9.12 of the El Paso Natural Gas Company
1995 Incentive Compensation Plan, Effective as of January 13, 1995 (the "Plan"),
the Plan is hereby amended as follows, effective April 1, 1998:

         Section 3.1 is amended to read as follows:

         "3.1  MAXIMUM NUMBER OF SHARES

                  Subject to Section 3.2, the maximum number of shares of common
         stock of the Company, $3 par value per share, (the "Common Stock")
         which may at any time be awarded under the Plan is two million five
         hundred thousand (2,500,000) shares of Common Stock, from shares held
         in the Company's treasury or out of authorized but unissued shares of
         the Company, or partly out of each, as shall be determined by the
         Management Committee, subject to, and reduced by (on a post-split
         basis), the number of shares of Common Stock awarded prior to the
         occurrence of a two-for-one stock split effected by the Company in the
         form of a 100% stock dividend on April 1, 1998. "Restricted Stock" is
         any share of Common Stock which is subject to the requirements of
         Section 8 and such other restrictions as the Plan Administrator may
         deem appropriate. Any shares of Restricted Stock outstanding under the
         Plan on April 1, 1998, shall be adjusted on a two-for-one basis to
         reflect the stock dividend."

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this amendment to be duly
executed on this 1st day of April, 1998.


                                      EL PASO NATURAL GAS COMPANY


                                      By:  /s/ JOEL RICHARDS III
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Joel Richards III
                                           Executive Vice President
                                           Member of the Management
                                                Committee
Attest:

/s/ David L. Siddall
----------------------------
    David L. Siddall 
    Corporate Secretary
#### 1237.7001 Certification of data.

Towards fulfilling DOT's policy at 1237.7000(a), contracting officers shall request information from prospective contractors for certification purposes. The type of information requested is dependent upon the criticality of the service and/or any unique or essential qualification requirements.
Notes from Telephone M eeting notes on RMP Proposed Rule between Jim Belke, OEM/USEPA

and Mark Dreux , Arent Fox PLLC, Washington, DC.

April 29, 2016

Mark Dreux: Why is EPA proposing to require that training requirements apply to supervisors?

Jim Belke: I d on ’ t have immediate access to the proposal and d o not recall the Agency's rationale in enough detail to discuss it now, but I w ill be able to discuss this on Monday when back in the office with the proposal at hand.

Mark Dreux: Concerning the requirement added to the PHA that facilities consider not only findings from incidents, but also other failure scenarios, why is EPA incorp orating this in to the PHA, which only requires it to be done once every five years? Why not require consideration of, for example, lessons learned from accidents at other facilities in the industry sector, in a more timely fashion?

Jim Belke: T his is an interesting idea and I recommend th at you submit a related comment to

EPA if you desire

.

Mark Dreux: Do the specified NAICS codes for the STAA provision refer to the overall NAICS for the facility, for the process, for any part of a process that falls in the NAICS, or what?

Jim Belke: T his is not an issue that I recall being considered by EPA and I encourage you to
submit a comment on it if you ha ve something to recommend.
**Exhibit 23**

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement (No. 333-193022) on Form S-8 and Registration Statement (No. 333-190943) on Form S-3 ofMandalay Digital Group, Inc. (the “Company”) of our report dated June 30, 2014, relating to our audit of the consolidated financial statements of the Company and Subsidiaries, which appear in this Amendment No. 2 to the Form 10-Kof the Company for the year ended March 31, 2014. 

/s/ SingerLewak LLP 

Los Angeles, California 

January 7, 2015
#### In the Matter of Joyce F. Tobin, Respondent, v. Security Trust Company of Rochester, New York, as Committee of the Property of Frederick M. Tobin, Jr., an Incompetent Person, Appellant.

Order of December 12, 1963 granting counsel fees in the amount of $150 unanimously affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. Appeal from order of December 12, 1963, denying reargument dismissed, without costs, as academic. (Appeal from order of Monroe Special Term denying motion of respondent to reargue and rehear the matter; also, appeal from order granting counsel fees.) Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Henry, Noonan and Del Veechio, JJ.