alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 282.5 Responsibilities. ( a ) The *General Counsel of the Department of Defense* (GC, DoD), or designee, shall: ( 1 ) Upon the request of the Director, Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals (DOHA), consult on, or render legal opinions concerning, questions of law that arise in the course of the performance of the Director's responsibilities under paragraph (b) of this section.
( 2 ) Render advance decisions under 31 U.S.C. 3529 and oversee the submission of requests for an advance decision arising from the activity of a DoD Component that are addressed to the Director of the Office of Personnel Management or the Administrator General Services in accordance with this part.
( b ) The *Director, Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals* (DOHA), or designee, under the GC, DoD (as the *Director, Defense Legal Services Agency*), shall: ( 1 ) Consider, and grant or deny, a request by the Secretary concerned under 31 U.S.C. 3702(e) to waive the time limit for submitting certain claims in accordance with 32 CFR part 281 and this part.
( 2 ) Consider appeals from an initial determination, and affirm, modify, reverse, or remand the initial determination in accordance with 32 CFR part 281, this part, and relevant DoD Office of General Counsel opinions.
( c ) The *Heads of the DoD Components*, or designees, shall: ( 1 ) Process claims under 31 U.S.C. 3702, 10 U.S.C. 2575, 10 U.S.C. 2771, 24 U.S.C. 420, 10 U.S.C. 4712, 10 U.S.C. 9712, 37 U.S.C. 554, and 32 U.S.C. 714 in accordance with this part.
( 2 ) Ensure that requests for an advance decision that originate in their organizations are prepared and submitted in accordance with this part.
( 3 ) Pay claims as provided in a final action in accordance with this part.
( d ) The *Heads of the Non-DoD Components*, or designees, shall: ( 1 ) Process claims under 31 U.S.C. 3702, 10 U.S.C. 2575, 10 U.S.C. 2771, or 37 U.S.C. 554 in accordance with this part.
( 2 ) Ensure that requests for an advance decision that originate in their organizations are prepared and submitted in accordance with this part.
( 3 ) Pay claims as provided in a final action in accordance with this part.
```

            PROVIDENT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

EXHIBIT 21 - SUBSIDIARIES OF PROVIDENT
--------------------------------------

The following table sets forth  Provident's  active  subsidiaries as of
the date of this report.

                                                            State of
                                                          Jurisdiction
                                            % of Voting  Under the Laws
                                             Securities     of which
                                               Owned        Organized
---------------------------------------------------------------------
The Provident Bank                               100           Ohio
 Provident Commercial Group, Inc.                100           Ohio
  Provident Auto Leasing Company                 100         Delaware
  Provident Auto Rental Company LLC 1998-1       100         Delaware
  Provident Auto Rental Company LLC 1998-2       100         Delaware
  Provident Auto Rental LLC 1999-1               100         Delaware
  Provident Auto Rental Company LLC (1999-PRU)   100         Delaware
  Provident Auto Rental Company LLC (2000-A)     100         Delaware
  Provident Auto Rental LLC (2000-1)             100         Delaware
  Provident Auto Rental LLC (2000-2)             100         Delaware
 Red Capital Markets, Inc.                       100           Ohio
  Provident Insurance Agency, Inc.               100           Ohio
 Red Mortgage Capital, Inc.                      100           Ohio
 Information Leasing Corporation                 100           Ohio
  Provident Lease Receivables Company LLC        100         Delaware
 Procurement Alternatives Corporation            100           Ohio
 Capstone Realty Advisors LLC                    100           Ohio
 PB Realty, Inc.                                 100           Ohio
 Provident Investment Management Corporation     100           Ohio
 Provident Community Development Company, LLC    100           Ohio
Provident Investment Advisers, Inc.              100           Ohio
Provident Capital Trust I                        100         Delaware
Provident Capital Trust II                       100         Delaware
Provident Capital Trust III                      100         Delaware
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 5.1.1

Eastern Division

Henry Espejo, et al.

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:11−cv−08987

Honorable Charles P. Kocoras

Santander Consumer USA, Inc.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Thursday, December 5, 2013:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Charles P. Kocoras: Pursuant to parties

stipulation (Doc [62]), the case is stayed pending mediation. Status hearing set for

2/20/2014 at 09:30 AM.Mailed notice(yp, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:11-cv-08987 Document #: 63 Filed: 12/05/13 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:596
EX-10.2



 






EXHIBIT 10.2




SIDE LETTER REGARDING VARIOUS MATTERS




Triple Crown Media, Inc.

546 East Main Street

Lexington, Kentucky 40508




Gray Publishing, LLC

546 East Main Street

Lexington, Kentucky 40508




Community First Holdings, Inc.

3500 Colonnade Parkway, Suite 600

Birmingham, Alabama 35243




	 	 	 
	Re:

	 	Asset Exchange Agreement dated as of April 1, 2006 (the “AEA”), among Triple Crown Media,
Inc. (“Triple”),

Gray Publishing, LLC (“Triple Sub”) and Community First Holdings, Inc.
(“Holdings”)






Gentlemen:



We refer to the AEA which is dated as of April 1, 2006, and otherwise agree as follows:



1.      The parties agree, for their mutual convenience, to close the exchange of assets as of the date
hereof, notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the AEA, with all of the documents used in
connection with the Closing to be effective as of April 1, 2006.



2.      The provisions of Section 2.4 of the AEA remain operative relating to the collection of cash
from accounts receivable (or otherwise) belonging to the other party.




 









 








     This side letter is effective as of the 7th day of April, 2006.



Community First Holdings, Inc.




By: /s/ DONNA BARRETT

Its: Authorized Representative




Triple Crown Media, Inc.




By: /s/ THOMAS J. STULTZ

Its: Authorized Representative




Gray Publishing, LLC




By: /s/ THOMAS J. STULTZ

Its: Authorized Representative
Amendment to Letter Agreement Dated 01/21/2006



 Exhibit 10.27 
 CONFIDENTIAL PORTIONS HAVE BEEN OMITTED BASED UPON A REQUEST 
 FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT PURSUANT
TO RULE 24b-2 OF THE 
 SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 AND HAVE BEEN SEPARATELY FILED 
 WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION. 
 January 21, 2006 
 Mr. Sidney Prince 
 Gold Kist Inc. 
 244 Perimeter Center Parkway, N.E. 
 Atlanta, GA 30346-2397 
 Dear Mr. Prince: 
 As discussed and agreed, Gold Kist will supply the EPL system with the following: 
 Fresh Marinated Breast Meat - *** of EPL
System needs for EPL Specification ***. Price *** per pound delivered to MBM/Rancho Cucamonga, CA and MBM/Pleasanton, CA. 
 Fresh Marinated Thigh meat - ***
of EPL System needs for EPL Specification ***. Price *** per pound delivered to MBM/Rancho Cucamonga, CA and MBM/Pleasanton, CA. 
 *** of the system volume
will be set aside for the development of an alternate(s) supplier. Additionally, in the event that EPL discontinues the use of the current specification for marinated fresh breast and/or marinated fresh thigh meat and transitions to a new
un-marinated fresh breast and/or fresh thigh meat specification, Goldkist will continue to supply fresh breast and/or fresh thigh meat at the volumes Goldkist had previously supplied as fresh marinated breast and/or fresh marinated thigh meat. The
new price for un-marinated fresh breast meat will be *** per pound delivered to MBM/Rancho Cucamonga, CA and MBM/Pleasanton, CA. The new price for un-marinated fresh thigh meat will be *** per pound delivered to MBM/Rancho Cucamonga, CA and
MBM/Pleasanton, CA. 
 As part of this Purchase Agreement, Supplier warrants that the prices for the items identified herein are not higher than those
currently extended to any other customer for the same or like items in equal or less quantities. If Supplier reduces its price for such items to any other customer during the term of this Purchase Agreement, Supplier agrees to reduce the price
quoted in this Purchase Agreement correspondingly. 
 Additionally, El Pollo Loco’s decision to enter into this Agreement is independent of any support
your firm may or may not choose to provide to the El Pollo Loco system. 
 This commercial agreement is subject to the General Terms and Conditions of Supply
executed by the parties hereto and currently on file with El Pollo Loco, Inc. 







 Terms: Net 10 Days 
 Pricing contract period: 03/01/06 through 03/01/07. 
 Please sign and return both copies of this letter. After I have received both signed copies, I will sign and return a copy for your files. Signing this letter acknowledges acceptance of the terms and conditions as presented above.

 Sidney, thank you for your help and support on this matter and please contact me with any questions. 
  

					
			
	/s/ Sidney Prince	 		 	/s/ Joe Stein
	 Sidney Prince
 Gold Kist Inc.
	 		 	 Joe Stein
 El Pollo Loco, Inc.


  

	cc:	Jennifer Benus, Shanae Brown/MBM
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A19A2045. WILLIE MAYS v. THE STATE.

 In 2015, Willie Mays pled guilty to theft by taking. He has filed numerous

applications and direct appeals in this Court stemming from his plea.1In this direct

appeal, Mays attempts to appeal the trial court’s October 17, 2017 order denying his

motion to set aside a void judgment. However, Mays did not file a notice of appeal

from this order until December 4, 2017. We lack jurisdiction for two reasons.

First, a notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days of entry of the order

sought to be appealed. OCGA § 5-6-38 (a). The proper and timely filing of a notice

of appeal is an absolute requirement to confer jurisdiction on this Court. Rowland v.

State, 264 Ga. 872, 872 (1) (452 SE2d 756) (1995). Mays’s notice of appeal is

untimely, as it was filed 48 days after entry of the order he seeks to appeal.

Moreover, as the Supreme Court has explained, a post-conviction motion to

vacate or set aside an allegedly void conviction is not an appropriate remedy in a

criminal case. See Roberts v. State, 286 Ga. 532, 532 (690 SE2d 150) (2010); Harper

v. State, 286 Ga. 216, 218 (1) (686 SE2d 786) (2009). Any appeal from an order

denying or dismissing such a motion must be dismissed. See Roberts, 286 Ga. at 532;

Harper, 286 Ga. at 218 (2).

1 See A19D0231 (dismissed Dec. 27, 2018); A19D0192 (dismissed Dec. 10,

2018); A19A0650 (dismissed Dec. 10, 2018); A19A0649 (dismissed Dec. 19, 2018);

A18A1715 (dismissed June 7, 2018); A18A1716 (dismissed June 7, 2018);

A17E0035 (denied Feb. 15, 2017); A04D0030 (dismissed Sep. 19, 2003).

July 01, 2019
 Because Mays’s notice of appeal is untimely and because his motion to set

aside a void judgment is not a valid remedy, this direct appeal from the trial court’s

denial of that motion is hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

07/01/2019
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

COMBINED PUBLIC MEETING ON:

TEST PROCEDURE NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULEMAKING (NOPR) – GENERAL 

SERVICE FLUORESCENT LAMPS, GENERAL SERVICE INCANDESCENT LAMPS, 

AND INCANDESCENT REFLECTOR LAMPS

AND

ENERGY CONSERVATION STANDARD

FRAMEWORK – GENERAL SERVICE FLUORESCENT LAMPS AND 

INCANDESCENT REFLECTOR LAMPS

U.S. Department of Energy

1000 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20585

Tuesday, October 4, 2011; Room 1E-245

Purpose

The Department of Energy (DOE) is holding this combined public meeting to discuss and invite 

comment on: 1) proposed test procedures for general service fluorescent lamps (GSFLs), general 

service incandescent lamps (GSILs), and incandescent reflector lamps (IRLs) and 2) proposed 

framework for GSFL and IRL energy conservation standards.

Agenda

9:00-9:30 am Welcome; Introductions; Overview; and Opening Statements

Tina Kaarsberg, PhD, DOE; Doug Brookman, Public Solutions

9:30-10:15 am NOPR Test Procedure

Maureen Kienle, Navigant

10:15 – 10:30 am Break

10:30 -11:00 am NOPR Test Procedure contd.

Maureen Kienle, Navigant

11:00-11:15 am Interested Party Statements 

NEMA; EEI, others 

11:15-12:15 am Framework Energy Conservation Standards: Overview; Scope 

of Coverage; Market & Technology; Screening Analysis

Aisha Husain, Navigant

12:15 pm-1:00 pm Lunch Break

1:00 pm-2:15 pm Engineering Analysis; Product Price Determination; Energy 

Use Aisha Husain, Navigant

2:15-2:30 pm Break

2:30-4:35 pm Life-Cycle Cost & Payback Period &Shipment Analyses; 

National Impact Analysis; NOPR Analyses; Next Steps

Aisha Husain, Navigant

4:35-5:10 pm Questions/Discussions; Closing Remarks

Tina Kaarsberg, PhD, DOE
The State



# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

July 29, 2014

N o. 04

- 13

- 00769

- CR

Juan Boaerge RIVERA

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the Cri minal District Court 4, Tarrant County, Texas

Trial Court No. 1197727D

The Honorable Michael Thomas, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Sandee Brian Marion, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

The panel has considered the Appellant ’ s Motion for Rehearing and the motion is

DENIED.



### PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:

______________________ Keith E. Hottle , Clerk

Clerk of Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE YEAR-
END CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         338,022
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               258,351
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                   196
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  1,033,278
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         342,131
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           342,065
<LOANS>                                      3,278,688
<ALLOWANCE>                                     52,575
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,530,783
<DEPOSITS>                                   4,815,141
<SHORT-TERM>                                   177,453
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             56,960
<LONG-TERM>                                      6,097
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        86,431
<OTHER-SE>                                     388,701
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               5,530,783
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                290,573
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               85,748
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    35
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               376,356
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             149,995
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             159,148
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          217,208
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    7,452
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                (37)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                207,940
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                105,345
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     105,345
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    68,562
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.37
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.34
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.66
<LOANS-NON>                                     15,630
<LOANS-PAST>                                     7,906
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   845
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                51,341
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    9,702
<RECOVERIES>                                     3,347
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               52,575
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            38,117
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                         14,458
        


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                  5


<S>                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>              12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                    DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                       JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                         DEC-31-2000
<CASH>                                 4,348,022
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                            142,295
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                       4,490,317
<PP&E>                                 4,241,129
<DEPRECIATION>                         1,208,212
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         7,524,234
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                  4,342,425
<BONDS>                                        0
<COMMON>                               1,417,087
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           7,524,234
<SALES>                                4,200,297
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                       4,502,830
<CGS>                                  2,432,114
<TOTAL-COSTS>                          2,432,114
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       161,839
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          328,316
<INCOME-TAX>                             159,749
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                             168,567
<EPS-BASIC>                                .12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                .12


</TABLE>
U.S. DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

ATTORNEY APPEARANCE FORM

NOTE: In order to appear before this Court an attorney must either be a member in good

standing of this Court’s general bar or be granted leave to appear pro hac vice as provided for

by Local Rules 83.12 through 83.14.

In the Matter of Case Number:

AN APPEARANCE IS HEREBY FILED BY THE UNDERSIGNED AS ATTORNEY FOR:

NAME (Type or print)

SIGNATURE (Use electronic signature if the appearance form is filed electronically)

 s/

FIRM

STREET ADDRESS

CITY/STATE/ZIP

ID NUMBER (SEE ITEM 3 IN INSTRUCTIONS) TELEPHONE NUMBER

ARE YOU ACTING AS LEAD COUNSEL IN THIS CASE? YES NO 

ARE YOU ACTING AS LOCAL COUNSEL IN THIS CASE? YES NO 

ARE YOU A MEMBER OF THIS COURT’S TRIAL BAR? YES NO 

IF THIS CASE REACHES TRIAL, WILL YOU ACT AS THE TRIAL ATTORNEY? YES NO 

IF THIS IS A CRIMINAL CASE, CHECK THE BOX BELOW THAT DESCRIBES YOUR STATUS.

RETAINED COUNSEL APPOINTED COUNSEL 

Case: 1:11-cv-08987 Document #: 5 Filed: 12/22/11 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:44
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 583 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 583

  To amend the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 to 
 authorize COPS grantees to use grant funds to hire veterans as career 
           law enforcement officers, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 8, 2017

 Mr. Cornyn (for himself, Ms. Klobuchar, Mr. Grassley, Mr. Blumenthal, 
   Mr. Tillis, Mrs. Feinstein, Mr. Hatch, Mr. Heller, and Mr. Cruz) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 to 
 authorize COPS grantees to use grant funds to hire veterans as career 
           law enforcement officers, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``American Law Enforcement Heroes Act 
of 2017''.

SEC. 2. PRIORITIZING HIRING AND TRAINING OF VETERANS.

    Section 1701(b)(2) of title I of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe 
Streets Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 3796dd(b)(2)) is amended by inserting 
``, including by prioritizing the hiring and training of veterans (as 
defined in section 101 of title 38, United States Code)'' after 
``Nation''.
                                 <all>
```